Patent Publication Number: US-2009239760-A1

Title: Method for the Identification of New Leads for Drug Candidates

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE SECTION TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application 60/782,104, filed Mar. 14, 2006 which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. 
    
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention is directed at a combinatorial approach for identifying high affinity ligands or new leads for drug candidates. The target may be unknown and/or may include one or more unknown binding sites. The present invention is also directed at kits for the method described herein. 
     BACKGROUND 
     Next to high-throughput screening (HTS), fragment-based drug design or fragment based screening (FBS) has established itself as a powerful tool for drug discovery. In FBS small chemical structures (“fragments”) are identified that often only exhibit weak binding affinity to a target. The concept was introduced as early as 1981 by Jencks (Jencks, 1981). At the time, Jencks&#39; concept did not have an immediate impact on drug design, since two principal problems remained: (a) identifying suitable fragments that bind a target in proximity to each other and (b) linking the fragments without distorting the binding of the individual fragments. Only in 1996 with the introduction of a method called SAR-by-NMR (SAR=“structure activity relationship”), fragment-based drug design took its course. SAR-by-NMR relies on the combination of serendipity screening and knowledge of the three dimensional structure of the target (WO97/18471; WO97/18469; U.S. Pat. No. 5,804,390; U.S. Pat. No. 5,698,401). 
     The term target-guided synthesis (TGS) is used to describe the fact that a target is involved in the modular build up of molecules. Generally, the goal is that the so assembled molecules have a higher binding affinity to the target than their individual parts (here “fragments”) and are able to exert a desired effect on the target. Sharpless and Kolb developed a strategy which relies on irreversible TGS to produce high affinity inhibitors from small fragments. They worked with acetylcholine esterase (AChE), a key player in neurotransmitter hydrolysis in the central and peripheral nervous system. Using their knowledge of the structure of the active site of AChE, fragments were designed to bind either the peripheral anionic site or the active center. The fragments carried azide and acetylene groups at the end of flexible spacers. While 52 fragment combinations were possible, the AChE “selected” four pairs of fragments that reacted via the azide and acetylene groups thus forming composite compounds. 
     These compounds were more potent than any other non-covalent organic AChE inhibitor and had dissociation constants (Kd) of up to 99 fM. Sharpless and Kolb&#39;s approach could even be used for the discovery of inhibitors from reagents that were not previously known to interact with AChE peripheral sites. (Röper &amp; Kolb, 2006). 
     Sharpless and Kolb worked with a well defined target which allowed a rational design of a fragment pool for testing. There remains a need for designing drug lead molecules (leads for drug candidates) for less well defined targets. 
     The publications and other materials, including patents, used herein to illustrate the invention and, in particular, to provide additional details respecting the practice are incorporated herein by reference. For convenience, the publications are referenced in the following text by author and year and are listed in the appended bibliography in alphabetical order. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES 
         FIG. 1  shows a micromolar MAG antagonist 1 (initial lead). 
         FIG. 2  shows the synthesis of the spin-labeled analogue 2 of the initial lead 1: i) HO(CH 2 ) 3 NHZ, NIS, TfOH, ACN, −40° C. to −30° C., 14 h; ii) PhCOCl, PPh 3 , DCE, r.t. 14 h, 95%; iii) a) NaOMe, MeOH, r.t. 2 h; b) H 2 O, 2 h, 52%; iv) [H] 2 , Pd/C, MeOH, 2 h, 95%; v) a) Dhbt, DIC, THF, 0° C., 2 h; b) 4-carboxy-TEMPO, DMF, r.t. 2 h, 57%. 
         FIG. 3  shows a hit from a second-site library. 
         FIG. 4  shows the reaction in which the initial lead was substituted with linkers of varying length resulting in compounds 14a to 14d: i) AgOTf, ACN, MS 3 Å, r.t. alkinol; ii) 1M NaOMe, MeOH, Amberlyst 15H + , r.t. 2 h; iii) pTsCl, pyr, 0° C.; iv) a. NaN 3 , DMF, 60° C., 24 h; b. Ac 2 O, pyr, DMAP; v) PhCOCl, PPh 3 , DCE, r.t. 16 h; vi) 10% NaOH, MeOH, Dowex 50×8 (Na + ). 
         FIGS. 5 and 6  show the reactions in which the second-site ligand was substituted with linkers of varying length resulting in compounds 22 and 26. Reactions leading to compounds 22 ( FIG. 5 ): i) POCl 3 , DMF, 92%; ii) NaBH 4 , MeOH, 93%; iii) Boc 2 O, DMAP, DCM, 14 h, 62%; iv) 19, CHCl 3 , r.t. 6 h, 62%; v) NaN 3 , 15-C-5, DMF, r.t. 16 h, 95%; iv) TFA, DCM, 70%. Reactions leading to compounds 26 ( FIG. 6 ): i) a. meldrum&#39;s acid, HCHO, proline, ACN, r.t. 20 h; b. Cu, pyr, EtOH, reflux, 2 h; ii) LAH, THF, 82%; iii) 19, CHCl 3 , r.t. 6 h; iv) NaN 3 , 15-C-5, DMF, r.t. 16 h, 96%. 
         FIG. 7  shows the reaction product (hit) resulting from incubating MAG with a mixture of the four compounds 14a to 14d (“substituted initial lead”) with the two substituted second-site ligands 22 and 26. MAG selected 14a and 26 to produce compound 27. 
     
    
    
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention is, in one embodiment, directed at a method for producing a new lead for a drug candidate comprising providing a target and at least one second-site ligand. An initial lead binds to a first site at the target and the ligand binds to a second site at the target. A second-site ligand affected by the initial lead is identified. A homogenous pool of the initial lead, in which each initial lead is substituted with a first linker comprising a first functional group is combined with a homogenous pool of the identified second-site ligand, in which each identified second-site ligand is substituted with a second linker comprising a second functional group. The first and second linker form a covalent linkage between the initial lead and said second-site ligand to produce a new lead for a drug candidate if
         (1) the initial lead and the second-site ligand are bound to the target, and   (2) the first and second functional groups are oriented so that they react with each other.       

     The first and second linker may vary in length or type and, optionally, functional group between initial leads/identified second-site ligands in the respective homogenous pool. 
     The target may have a structure that is unknown. 
     The initial lead may be substituted with a spin label, such as a TEMPO-derivate, to quench a NMR signal of the second-site ligand, when said second-site ligand is bound to the target. 
     The second-site ligand may bind to the target proximate of the initial lead, such as in a distance of less than 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 36, 27, 28, 29 or 30 Å. The first and second functional group may react with each other in a chemical reaction, such as a cycloaddition reaction, to form a covalent linkage. 
     The first functional group may be an azide, the second functional group may be an acetylene or vice versa. 
     The initial lead and/or said second-site ligand may have micromolar (μM) or millimolar (mM) binding affinities to the target, while the new lead for a drug candidate formed may have a binding affinity to the target exceeding the sum of the binding affinities of the initial lead and the second-site ligand, such as a micromolar (μM) or nanomolar (nM) binding affinity. The second-site ligand may be part of a pool of compounds having a framework found in known drugs or having a set of properties found in drugs. The initial lead may be substituted with a spin label and may quench a NMR signal of the second-site ligand when said second-site ligand is bound to the target. This pool of compounds may be subdivided into sub-pools, wherein the sub-pool may be selected so that, in an NMR spectrum of the sub-pool, at least one signal of each second-site ligand in said sub-pool remains distinguishable. 
     The initial lead may also be identified as part of the above method. This initial lead may, in such an embodiment, be selected from a pool of compounds having a framework found in known drugs or having a set of properties found in drugs. 
     The invention is also directed towards a kit for producing new leads for drug candidates comprising: a homogenous pool of compounds having a framework found in known drugs or having a set of properties found in drugs, wherein each of said compounds in said pool has at least one linker arm attached to it; and instructions for selecting from said compounds a second-site ligand for producing a new lead for drug candidates according to the methods described herein. The compounds of the homogenous pool may comprise linker that vary in length or type and, optionally, functional group. 
     The invention is also directed at new leads for drug candidates produced via the above method, including a drug candidate or drug comprising or being based on the following compound, which may be further optimized: 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF VARIOUS AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION 
     A ligand such as a second-site ligand and an initial lead is, in the context of the present invention, any molecule that may bind to a target. Preferably, the ligand is a relatively small molecule (“fragment”), particularly a small organic molecule of less than about 2000 Da. Especially preferred are “drug-like” molecules. Ligands may be naturally derived ligands, e.g. obtainable by isolation from a natural organism, preferably from plants, animals or human beings or obtainable by genetic engineering. Such ligands may further be modified, e.g. by treating them with enzymes or chemical compounds. 
     A new lead for drug candidates, in the context of the present invention, is a modular molecule that may serve as a base structure for the design of a new drug or may itself constitute a new drug. A drug candidate may comprise or be based on such a new lead, usually, but not always, the new lead for drug candidates is further optimized, e.g., by chemical modification aimed at, among others, improvement of potency, selectivity vs. related targets, reduction of toxicity, metabolic susceptibility, solubility, stability and, last but not least in vivo efficacy. 
     The term second-site ligand, in the context of the present invention, is used broadly and means any ligand that binds the target in addition to a first ligand or first-site ligand. Such a second-site ligand may be a “true” second-site ligand, that is a ligand that binds to the target simultaneously with and in the proximity of the first ligand. A first ligand that binds to a target and has characteristics, such as certain inhibitory or blocking effects, that make it a potential module for a drug lead candidate can be called an initial lead. 
     A homogenous pool of a ligand (“homogenous library” of a ligand), e.g. of a second-site ligand or an initial lead according to the present invention means that the ligands in the pool are the same but may vary in the nature of their linker, such as length, type and/or functional group, including how and where the linker is attached to the ligand. 
     A second-site ligand is said to be affected by the initial lead if the initial lead exerts, with or without prior modification, an influence on the second-site ligand which can be measured and is, in certain embodiments, quantifiable. 
     Second-site ligands that are affected by the initial lead can be detected in different ways, including NMR based methods that involve, e.g. spin labeling the initial lead. Spin labels according to the present invention include radicals such TEMPO radicals. In a preferred embodiment, the second-site ligand is detected via the method described by Jahnke et al. (Jahnke, 2000). In a preferred embodiment, the reaction solution for identifying second-site ligands comprises not more than about 200 μM, not more than about 100 μM, not more than about 75 μM, not more than about 50 μM, not more than about 25 μM, not more than about 10 μM, not more than about 9 μM, not more than about 8 μM, not more than about 7 μM, not more than about 6 μM, not more than about 5 μM, not more than about 4 μM, not more than about 3 μM, not more than about 2 μM or not more than about 1 μM of target. Preferably the reaction solution comprises between about 25 μM and about 5 μM, between about 10 μM and about 1 μM and more preferably between about 10 μM and about 5 μM of target. Jahnke&#39;s method detects the paramagnetic relaxation enhancement on a second ligand caused by a spin-labeled first ligand. The method allows for the detection of “true” second-site ligands, which are ligands that bind to the target (1) simultaneously with and (2) in the proximity of the first ligand (“second-site screening”). 
     In one preferred embodiment of the present invention, the synthesis requirements associated with the method and kit of the present invention will be limited. For example, starting with a library that is commercially or otherwise available, the number of compounds that need synthesis, such as the attachment of a spin label, may be equal or less than 15, 14, 13, 12, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, or 3. If a kit according to the present invention is used, the number may be even less, namely 2 or even only 1. 
     However, as the person skilled in the art will appreciate that other methods can be employed to determine whether a second-site ligand is affected by the initial lead. These methods include, but are not limited to, mass spectroscopical methods including “SAR by MS”, X-ray crystallography as well as target-based assays. In the latter approach, a second-site ligand that is situated in the proximity of, e.g. an initial lead, can be identified by observing changes in its properties, such as binding properties, due to the proximity of a bound initial lead. 
     The second-site ligand is, in certain embodiments of the present invention, part of a pool of compounds having a framework found in known drugs and having a set of properties found in drugs (“drug-like compounds”). These pools, which are sometimes also referred to as “libraries,” may be established following a wide array of parameters and/or filtering methods. For example, it has been suggested to avoid compounds that contain atoms other than C, O, H, N, S, P, F, Cl, Br, I or larger molecules. Especially predictive for good oral bioavailability is the “Lipinski rule of five” (Sen, 2006). Other criteria for library design are: diversity, drug-like character, solubility and synthetic accessibility. Information on frameworks may also be used to design a fragment library for, e.g., NMR screening by choosing actual ring/substructures that match the most frequently occurring frameworks. The SHAPES NMR fragment library describes common frameworks for molecules that are often found in drugs. 
     The second-site ligand is said to bind proximate to (“in the proximity”) the initial lead if, subsequent to binding to the target, the second-site ligand is affected by the initial lead or vice versa. As the person skilled in the art will appreciate, what is considered proximate will generally depend on the structure of the target. A second-site ligand is typically, but not exclusively, said to bind “proximate” to the initial lead when it binds at a distance of less than about 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 36, 27, 28, 29 or 30 Å, preferably at a distance of less than about 25 Å, even more preferably at a distance of less than about 20 Å. 
     As the person skilled in the art will appreciate the initial lead can be identified in a wide variety of ways. For example, a physiological ligand that is detected or known can serve as an initial lead. The initial lead can also be detected using classical screening techniques including an array of high-throughput screening approaches. A wide variety of NMR based techniques are also available and include, but are not limited to, nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) (Meyer, 1997; Chen, 1998; Chen, 2000; Fejzo, 1999), chemical shift perturbation (Shuker, 1996), diffusion (Lin, 1996; Lin 1997-a; Lin, 1997-b), relaxation (Hadjuk, 1997) and saturation transfer (Mayer, 1999; Klein, 1999; Dalvit, 2000). 
     A target can be any kind of biomolecule that is amenable to influence by the binding of another molecule. Such a target may be a nucleic acid, e.g. a DNA or RNA molecule, or may be a peptide or polypeptide such as a protein (including a glyco- or lipoprotein). Typical categories of targets include, but are not limited to, enzymes, receptors, transporters and channels. In certain embodiments, the target is known to have a function in disease onset, development or establishment. In many, but not all embodiments, the target is naturally derived. 
     The structure of a target is said to be unknown if structural parameters of the target that characterize a second binding site have not sufficiently been characterized to allow a rational design of a limited pool of second-site ligands for this binding site and/or of linkages between first and second-site ligands. This is often the case when the crystal structure of the target has not been established. The pool of compounds that is selected for testing such a unknown target may comprise about 0.5 million molecules or more, about 0.4, about 0.3, about 0.2, or about 0.1 million molecules or more. In certain embodiments, the pool may include about 50.000 or more, about 10.000 or more, about 5.000 or more, 1.000 or more fragments. These numbers assume that the pool has not been reduced in size by selecting “drug-like compounds.” As the person skilled in the art will appreciate, not all of the molecules in such a pool need to be tested to find a second-site ligand. Also, the pool may be subdivided in smaller sub-pools without deviating from the spirit of this invention. Even if the target is known, the method of the present invention can be performed without structural information about the target. 
     The ligand binding site(s), in particular the “second site” on the target may be a flat (unstructured) binding site that might be as large as 1000 Å or more. However, the area of such a binding site is typically less than about 1000 Å, less than about 900 Å, less than about 800 Å, but more than about 100 Å, more than about 200 Å, more than about 300 Å, more than about 400 Å or more than about 500 Å, preferably it is between about 200 Å and about 1000 Å. These binding sites comprise, but are not limited to, those involving carbohydrate-lectin interactions but also those involving protein-protein interactions. In one embodiment of the present invention, the method and kit of the present invention are employed, when optimization via approaches more suitable for structured binding sites, such as mimetic approaches, as in the context of, e.g. SLe X -E-selectin, are unsuccessful. 
     A linker (“linker arm”) according to the present invention usually comprises an arm section and a functional group. This functional group may react with another functional group to form a covalent linkage between two fragments such as an initial lead (“first ligand”/“first-site ligand”) and a second-site ligand of a target. In certain embodiments one of the linkers comprises only a functional group. However, typically, the covalent linkage is formed by two linkers each comprising an arm section and a functional group. Each of the linkers is attached to the initial lead and the second-site ligand, respectively. In one preferred embodiment, the functional groups, located at the distal ends of the arm section of the linker, are able to react with each other under a certain set of conditions. For example, the functional groups can react with each other when the distance between them is small enough for them to react. This distance will also be referred to as “reaction distance”. The ability to react might be influenced by a variety of factors such a temperature, presence and absence of co-factors and similar. These factors, as the person skilled in the art will appreciate, depend on the nature of the functional groups involved. As the person skilled in the art will also appreciate, the type of linker might vary widely. Two or more linker are said to vary in type, if, as will be explained in the next section, the arm section of one linker differs in composition from the arm section of the other linker. For example, one type of linker comprises a simple hydrocarbon chain as an arm section, while the other type comprises a sulfur containing aliphatic arm section and yet another type comprises a heteroaromatic arm section. Varying the length of the linker is often accomplished by varying the length of the arm section of the linker. Thus, a linker having an arm section of the formula (CH 2 ) 3  will vary in length from a linker having an arm section of the formula (CH 2 ) 4 . 
     The arm section of a linker can comprise a wide variety of atoms. In one preferred embodiment, the arm section will comprise a simple hydrocarbon chain and can be described by the structural formula (CH 2 ) n  wherein n can be any number, but is preferably 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, more preferably between 2 and 6. However, other arm section designs are also within the scope of the present invention. For example, the arm section might contain heteroatoms such as oxygen, sulfur or nitrogen. In a preferred embodiment, these heteroatoms alternate with at least two consecutive C atoms to form a chain of atoms. The arm section can also comprise ring structures such as aliphatic, heteroaliphatic, aromatic or heteroaromatic rings. While these are some examples, the person skilled in the art will appreciate that arm section design can vary widely. However, arm sections that result in few or no conformational restrictions will, in most embodiments, be preferred over arm sections that cause a variety of conformational restrictions. In certain embodiments, the arm sections are attached to an atom at the target that is accessible to such attachment. In certain preferred embodiments such an atom is proximal to the other ligand. Depending on the attachment point, the reactions involved in such an attachment, which often result in covalent bonds, will vary. However, a stable attachment is in many embodiments of the invention preferred over a non-stable attachment. 
     The functional groups at the initial lead and the second-site ligand are able to react with each other. In a preferred embodiment, these functional groups engage in “click chemistry” reactions, which include, but are not limited to, cycloaddition reactions, such as hetero-Diels-Adler and 1,3 dipolar cycloaddition reactions; reactions of carbonyls, e.g. the formation of hydrazones, oxime ethers and heteroaromatic synthesis; addition to carbon-carbon multiple bonds or nucleophilic substitution on strained compounds and intermediates (Röper &amp; Kolb, 2006). In a particularly preferred embodiment one of the functional groups is an azide group and the other is an acetylene group. 
     Whether the first and second functional group attached to the initial lead and the second-site ligand respectively, are oriented so that they react with each other will, in many embodiments of the present invention, depend on the length of the arm section of the linker of the initial lead and/or second-site ligand. In certain embodiments it will also depend, alternatively or additionally, on the composition of the arm section. 
     The invention will now be described by a non-limiting example. In particular, the search of a new lead for a drug candidate acting on myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG) (McKerracher, 1994; Mukhopadhyay, 1994; Vinson, 2001) will be described. The person skilled in the art will readily be able to apply the principles used in the approach described herein for MAG to other biomolecules, in particular molecules, such as proteins, whose characterization is somewhere at the level described below for MAG. 
     MAG is a sialic acid-binding immunoglobulin-like lectin and a member of the Siglec family. Its role (Kelm, 1994; Crocker, 1998) as one of several myelin components inhibiting axonal regrowth after injury has drawn a lot of attention (McKerracher, 2002). Although the exact mechanism is still unclear, it is believed that blocking the inhibitory activity of MAG could support the regeneration after injury to the central nervous system (CNS). Schnaar (Yang, 1996) reported that GQ1bα, GD1a and GT1b, known to be expressed on myelinated neurons in vivo, are functional ligands of MAG. These gangliosides have been synthesized in preparative amounts (Hotta, 1995; Ito, 1999; Ito, 2001), and were therefore used to establish a structure affinity relationship (SAR). Thereafter, the SAR profile was refined by numerous synthetic contributions based on ganglioside fragments (Kelm, 1998; Strenge, 1998; Sawada, 1999; Schwizer, 2006; International Patent Publication WO03/000709; U.S. Patent Publication 2004176309), mimics thereof (Gao, 2007) and neuraminic acid derivatives (Schwizer, 2006). The recently reported ability to reverse MAG inhibition with monovalent glycosides (Vyas, 2005) encourages further exploration of glycans and glycan mimics as inhibitors of MAG-mediated axonal outgrowth inhibition. 
     A first generation of MAG blockers with micromolar affinity was obtained when ganglioside GQ1bα could successfully be reduced to a low molecular weight ligand consisting only of a modified N-acetyl-neuraminic acid moiety (Kelm, 1998; Strenge, 1998; Sawada, 1999; Schwizer, 2006; Collins, 1999; International Patent Publication WO03/000709; U.S. Patent Publication 2004176309). However, a broad optimization effort did not result in nanomolar MAG antagonist (Gao, 2007; Schwizer, 2006). Since the crystal structure of MAG is not yet available, no rational design approach was possible. In addition, a homology model (Bhunia, 2007) based on the crystal structure of the N-terminal V-set domain of sialoadhesin (May 1998), revealed a flat, unstructured binding site and no obvious possibility for additional intruding interactions with the protein surface. Inspection of the homology models did not allow the identification of proximate second sites on the MAG surface. 
     Therefore, a two-stage combinatorial approach for the design of low molecular weight antagonists was explored. The starting point was the micromolar MAG antagonist 1 shown in  FIG. 1 , a sialic acid derivative, which has been shown to exhibit affinity in the low micromolar range (Kelm, 1998; International Patent Publication WO03/000709; U.S. Patent Publication 2004176309; Shelke, 2007). 1 was selected as ligand for the first binding site (“initial lead”). In the first step, second-sites located in the proximity of the sialic acid binding site were identified applying the elegant approach described by Jahnke et al. (Jahnke, 2000). Members of a library composed of 60 divers or sub-libraries thereof, which are drug-like, soluble and synthetically easily available fragments (“second-site ligands”) binding to the target protein were identified based on their shorter relaxation time in H-NMR. Then, in the presence of the spin-labeled analogue 2 of the first ligand 1 that is shown in the scheme depicted in  FIG. 2  neighboring second-site ligands were identified according to their paramagnetic relaxation enhancement caused by the spin-labeled first-site ligand 2. Since, in a target-based inhibition assay (Crocker, 1996), 1 and 2 exhibited comparable affinities (approx 20 μmolar), it was unlikely that the modification with the spin label would induce a drastic change in the binding mode. For the fragment 15 shown in  FIG. 3 , enhanced relaxation was observed indicating binding proximate to (radius of 15 to 20 Å) the unpaired electron of the Tempo spin label in 2. The affinity of this fragment 15 in a surface plasmon resonance experiment was determined to be in the low millimolar range. 
     In the second step, the first and second-site ligands were linked using the in situ click chemistry approach (Lewis, 2002; Bourne, 2004; Manetsch, 2004; Mocharla, 2005), which allows the irreversible target-guided synthesis of high affinity ligands from small fragments. For that purpose, a small homogenous library of the first-site ligand, the sialic acid derivatives 14a-d shown in scheme depicted in  FIG. 4 , was synthesized. To avoid large entropic costs originating from numerous rotatable bonds (Mammen, 1998) present in extended linkers, only short chains allowing the connection of spatially close (“proximate”) binding sites were considered. 
     As a second-site ligand, 5-nitro-1H-indole (15), was selected as the nitro group which allows for further exploration of the MAG surface. Therefore, the two azido compounds, 3-azidomethyl-5-nitro-1H-indole 22 shown in the scheme depicted in  FIGS. 5  and 3-azidopropyl-5-nitro-1H-indole 26 shown in the scheme depicted in  FIG. 6 , were synthesized by standard procedures. 
     For the in situ click chemistry experiment (Lewis, 2002; Bourne, 2004; Manetsch, 2004; Mocharla, 2005), Fc-MAG(d1-3) (Crocker, 1996) (8.77 μM) was incubated with a mixture of the four substituted first-site ligands 14a-d (each 40 μM) and the two substituted second-site ligands 22, 26 (each 800 μM) in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) at 37° C. for 24 h. The different concentrations of the first- and second-site ligands reflect their affinities in the low micro- and millimolar range. LC-MS analysis indicated according to the MW that only one new compound, namely the trizole 27 shown in  FIG. 7  was formed. 27 was independently synthesized and its affinity determined in a SPR experiment where Fc-MAG(d1-3) (Crocker, 1996) was immobilized by protein A interaction giving a K D  of 190 nM. To exclude that false positives are formed during incubation, two control experiments were performed. In the first, MAG was replaced by bovine serum albumin. In the second, no protein was added. In both experiments, no triazole formation could be observed. 
     In sum, a nanomolar MAG antagonist could be surprisingly identified with the method of the present invention. The synthetic effort was, compared to other methods, minimal. Starting with the library composed of 60 divers, merely 6 compounds needed to be synthesized (including substituted first and second-site ligands) to successfully identify a high affinity antagonist for MAG. No structural information of the target protein was required. 
     Materials and Methods 
     Synthesis of the Sialic Acid Derivatives 14a-d 
     Methyl (5-acetamido-4,7,8,9-tetra-O-acetyl-2-chloro-3,5-dideoxy- D -glycero- D -galacto-2-nonulopyranosid)onate (8). To a stirred solution (−20° C.) of NeuNAc (800 mg, 1.50 mmol) and AcCl (1.8 ml) in DCM (5 ml) was added 32% HCl (213 ml). After stirring for 16 h at r.t., the mixture was diluted with cold DCM and subsequently washed with H 2 O, 5% NaHCO 3  and brine. The organic layer was dried over Na 2 SO 4  and evaporated to give 8 (700 mg, 91%) as a fluffy solid. 
       1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ1.95 (s, 3H, NHAc), 2.08, 2.09, 2.11, 2.16 (4s, 12H, OAc), 2.32 (t, J=13.9 Hz, 1H, H-3a), 2.82 (dd, J=4.8, 13.9 Hz, 1H, H-3e), 3.91 (s, 3H, COOCH 3 ), 4.10 (dd, J=5.7, 12.5 Hz, 1H, H-9a), 4.24 (q, J=10.5, 1H, H-5), 4.38 (dd, J=2.4, 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-6), 4.45 (dd, J=2.7, 12.6 Hz, 1H, H-9b), 5.21 (m, 1H, H-8), 5.36 (d, J=10.2 Hz, 1H, NH-5), 5.45 (m, 1H, H-4), 5.51 (dd, J=2.4, 7.1 Hz, 1H, H-7). (See, e.g., Claridge, 1999). 
     Methyl [(2-propinyl) 5-acetamido-4,7,8,9-tetra-O-acetyl-3,5-dideoxy- D -glycero-α- and β- D -galacto-2-nonulopyranosid]onate (9a). Compound 8 (1.40 g, 2.75 mmol) was dissolved in dry MeCN (30 ml) containing propargyl alcohol (308 mg, 5.50 mmol) and molecular sieves 3 Å (4.0 g). The mixture was stirred at r.t. for 1 h with light exclusion. Then AgOTf (1.41 g, 5.50 mmol) was added in one portion and stirring continued at r.t. for 16 h. The mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite and the Celite was washed thoroughly with DCM. The filtrate was subsequently washed with 10% NaHCO 3 , sat. Na 2 S 2 O 3  and water. The organic layer was dried with Na 2 SO 4  and the DCM evaporated. The residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography (PE:DCM:iPrOH 8:4:1). 25a (1.150 g, 79%) was obtained as anomeric mixture (α:β1:1). 
     Methyl [(2-propinyl) 5-acetamido-3,5-dideoxy- D -glycero-α- D -galacto-2-nonulopyranosid]onate (10a). A solution of 9a (1.15 g, 2.20 mmol) in dry MeOH (30 mL) was treated with 1 M NaOMe/MeOH (5 mL) at r.t. for 2 h. The reaction mixture was neutralized with Amberlyst 15 (H + ) ion-exchange resin and filtered through a pad of Celite. The Celite was washed thoroughly with methanol (3×10 mL), and the combined filtrates were evaporated to dryness and purified by silica gel column chromatography (DCM/MeOH 7:3). The initial fractions collected gave 10a (263 mg, 62%). 
       1 H NMR (500 MHz, CD 3 OD): δ 1.71 (t, J=12.6 Hz, 1H, H-3a), 1.97 (s, 3H, NHAc), 2.67 (dd, J=4.6, 12.8 Hz, 1H, H-3e), 2.83 (X of ABX, J=2.4 Hz, 1H, C≡C H ), 3.47 (dd, J=1.3, 9.0 Hz, 1H, H-7), 3.56 (dd, J=1.3, 10.5 Hz, 1H, H-6), 3.60-3.65 (m, 2H, H-4, H-9a), 3.73-3.83 (m, 3H, H-5, H-8, H-9b), 3.81 (s, 3H, CO 2 C H   3 ), 4.32 (AB of ABX, J=2.4, 15.9 Hz, 2H, H-1′);  13 C NMR (125 MHz, D 2 O): δ 23.2 (NHCO C H 3 ), 41.9 (C-3), 53.3 (C-1′), 53.9 (CO 2 CH 3 ), 54.1 (C-5), 65.1 (C-9), 68.9 (C-4), 70.5 (C-7), 72.6 (C-8), 75.3 (C≡CH), 75.3 (C-6), 80.7 ( C ≡CH), 99.9 (C-2), 170.9, 175.6 (2CO). 
     Methyl [(2-propinyl) 5-acetamido-3,5-dideoxy-9-O-(4-toluenesulfonyl)- D -glycero-α- D -galacto-2-nonulopyranosid]onate (11a). To a solution of 10a (263 mg, 0.728 mmol) in pyridine (15 ml) was added p-TsCl (138 mg, 0.728 mmol) at 0° C. After 2 h, additional p-TsCl (69 mg, 0.364 mmol) was added and stirring continued for 16 h at 5° C. The reaction mixture was warmed to r.t. and then diluted with methanol (20 mL) and stirring continued for 30 min. After removal of the solvents the remaining syrup was purified by chromatography on silica gel (DCM/MeOH 19:1) to yield 11a as a foamy solid (223 mg, 60%). 
       1 H NMR (500 MHz, CD 3 OD): δ 1.69 (t, J=12.8 Hz, 1H, H-3a), 1.99 (s, 3H, NHAc), 2.46 (s, 3H, Ph-C H   3 ), 2.67 (dd, J=4.6, 12.8 Hz, 1H, H-3e), 2.84 (X of ABX, J=2.5 Hz, 1H, C≡C H ) 3.44 (dd, J=1.4, 8.8 Hz, 1H, H-7), 3.55 (dd, J=1.4, 10.5 Hz, 1H, H-6), 3.63 (m, 1H, H-4), 3.71 (m, 1H, H-5), 3.81 (s, 3H, CO 2 CH 3 ), 3.97 (m 1H, H-8), 4.08 (m, 1H, H-9a), 4.23-4.32 (m, 3H, H-9b, H-1′), 7.45 (AA′ of AA′BB′, 2H, J=8.0 Hz, Ar—H), 7.80 (BB′ of AA′BB′, 2H, J=8.3 Hz, Ar—H);  13 C NMR (125 MHz, CD 3 OD): δ 22.0 (Ph- C H 3 ), 23.1 (NHCO C H 3 ), 41.9 (C-3), 53.4 (C-1′), 53.7 (CO 2 CH 3 ), 54.0 (C-5), 68.7 (C-4), 70.1 (C-8), 70.4 (C-7), 74.1 (C-9), 75.0 (C-6), 76.1 (C≡ C H), 80.8 ( C ≡CH), 100.0 (C-2), 129.5, 131.4, 134.7, 146.8 (6C, C 6 H 5 ), 170.5, 175.5 (2CO). 
     Methyl [(2-propinyl) 5-acetamido-4,7,8-tri-O-acetyl-9-azido-3,5,9-trideoxy- D -glycero-α- D -galacto-2-nonulopyranosid]onate (12a). A mixture of 11a (223 mg, 0.18 mmol), crown ether 18-C-6 (44.8 mg, 0.17 mmol) and NaN 3  (139.7 mg, 2.15 mmol) was stirred in DMF (4 mL) at 60° C. for 24 h. The mixture was filtered through a pad of Celite and the filtrate was evaporated to dryness. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel in DCM:MeOH (7:3) yielded a white solid (110 mg, 66%), which was dissolved in dry pyridine (1.17 ml, 14.8 mmol) and stirred at 0° C. for 15 min under argon before DMAP (4.90 mg, 0.04 mmol) and Ac 2 O (1.28 ml, 12.6 mmol) were added simultaneously at 0° C. After stirring at r.t. for 14 h, TLC analysis showed completion of the reaction. After evaporation of the solvents and chromatography on silica gel (DCM/MeOH 9:1) 12a was obtained as a white foam (90 mg, 62%). 
       1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 1.84 (s, 3H, NHAc), 1.95 (t, J=12.5 Hz, 1H, H-3a), 2.00, 2.12, 2.14 (3s, 9H, 30Ac), 2.43 (X of ABX, J=2.4 Hz, 1H, C≡C H ), 2.60 (dd, J=4.7, 12.9 Hz, 1H, H-3e), 3.25 (dd, J=2.9, 5.2 Hz, 1H, H-9a), 3.55 (dd, J=2.5, 14.7 Hz, 1H, H-9b), 3.78 (s, 3H, CO 2 CH 3 ), 4.06 (m, 2H, H-5, H-6), 4.12, 4.35 (AB of ABX, J=2.4, 15.7 Hz, 2H, H-1′), 4.83 (m, 1H, H-4), 5.28 (m, 2H, H-7, H-8), 5.48 (d, J=9.3 Hz, 1H, NH);  13 C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 21.2, 21.2, 21.4 (3OCO C H 3 ), 23.5 (NHCO C H 3 ), 38.1 (C-3), 49.5 (C-5), 51.2 (C-9), 53.1 (CO 2   C H 3 ), 53.3 (C-1′), 68.2 (C-8), 69.1 (C-4), 70.2 (C-7), 73.3 (C-6), 75.0 (C≡ C H), 79.2 ( C ≡CH), 98.5 (C-2), 168.1, 170.6, 170.6 170.7, 171.3 (5CO). 
     Methyl [(2-propinyl) 5-acetamido-4,7,8-tri-O-acetyl-9-benzamido-3,5,9-trideoxy- D -glycero-α- D -galacto-2-nonulopyranosid]onate (13a). Compound 12a (90 mg, 0.17 mmol) was reacted with benzoyl chloride (95.2 mg, 0.68 mmol) and triphenyl phosphine (96.9 mg, 0.37 mmol) in DCE (4 mL) for 1 h. After stirring at r.t. for 16 h, the solvent was evaporated. Purification by column chromatography on silica gel (DCM:MeOH 97:3) yielded 13a as a solid (54 mg, 52%). 
       1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 1.88 (s, 3H, NHAc), 1.98 (t, J=12.6 Hz, 1H, H-3a), 2.03, 2.09, 2.24 (3s, 9H, 30Ac), 2.43 (X of ABX, J=2.4 Hz, 1H, C≡C H ), 2.64 (dd, J=4.6, 12.7 Hz, 1H, H-3e), 2.97 (m, 1H, H-9a), 3.73 (s, 3H, CO 2 CH 3 ), 3.99 (dd, J=2.1, 10.8 Hz, 1H, H-6), 4.16 (m, 2H, H-5, H-1′a), 4.32 (m, 1H, H-9b), 4.39 (dd, J=2.5, 15.6 Hz, 1H, H-1′a), 4.85 (m, 1H, H-4), 5.16 (dd, J=2.0, 9.8 Hz, 1H, H-7), 5.27 (m, 1H, H-8), 5.60 (d, J=10.1 Hz, 1H, NH-5), 7.11 (m, 1H, NH-9), 7.44, 7.58, 7.81 (m, 5H, C 6 H 5 );  13 C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 21.2, 21.4, 21.5 (3OCO C H 3 ), 23.4 (NHCO C H 3 ), 38.1 (C-3), 38.8 (C-9), 49.7 (C-5), 53.2 (2C, CO 2   C H 3 , C-1′), 68.2 (C-7), 68.7 (C-8), 69.3 (C-4), 72.6 (C-6), 74.9 (C≡ C H), 79.2 ( C ≡CH), 98.4 (C-2), 127.3, 128.8, 130.4, 133.8 (6C, C 6 H 5 ), 167.9, 167.9, 170.8 171.1, 171.6, 172.7 (6CO). 
     Sodium [(2-propinyl) 5-acetamido-9-benzamido-3,5,9-trideoxy- D -glycero-α- D -galacto-2-nonulopyranosid]onate (14a). To a solution of compound 13a (54 mg) in methanol (2 mL) was added 10% aq. NaOH (0.2 mL). The mixture was stirred at r.t. for 3 h. After neutralization with 10% HCl (0.2 ml), the solution was concentrated and the residue was purified by reversed-phase chromatography (RP-18 column, 5% gradient MeOH in water), Dowex 50×8 ion-exchange chromatography (Na +  type), and P2 size exclusion chromatography to afford 14a (41 mg, 95%) as a colorless solid after final lyophilization from water. 
     [α] D  −0.5 (c 0.10, H 2 O);  1 H NMR (500 MHz, D 2 O): δ1.67 (t, J=12.2 Hz, 1H, H-3a), 1.98 (s, 3H, NHAc), 2.73 (dd, J=4.7, 12.5 Hz, 1H, H-3e), 3.54 (m, 2H, H 7, H-9a), 3.67 (m, 1H, H-4), 3.75 (m, 2H, H-6, H-9b), 3.83 (m, 1H, H-5), 4.06 (m 1H, H-8), 4.35, 4.21 (A, B, of AB, J=15.6 Hz, 2H, H-1′), 7.50, 7.58, 7.74 (m, 5H, C 6 H 5 );  13 C NMR (125 MHz, D 2 C): δ 22.3 (NHCO C H 3 ), 40.6 (C-3), 43.0 (C-9), 52.1 (C-5), 52.9 (C-1′), 68.4 (C-4), 70.1 (C-7), 70.4 (2C, C-8, C≡ C H), 73.1 (C-6), 79.8 ( C ≡CH), 101.0 (C-2), 127.4, 129.1, 132.4, 133.9 (C 6 H 5 ), 171.6, 173.1, 175.3 (3CO). 
     The sialic acid derivatives 14b, 14c and 14d were synthesized by the same sequence of reaction. 
     5-Nitro-1H-indole derivatives were synthesized by established procedures 
     3-(1-Azidomethyl)-5-nitro-1H-indole (22).  1 H NMR (500 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 4.50 (s, 2H, CH 2 ), 7.39 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar—H), 7.55 (d, J=2.4 Hz, 1H, 1H, Ar—H), 7.84 (dd, J=2.3, 9.0 Hz, 1H, Ar—H), 8.45 (d, J=2.3 Hz, 1H, Ar—H), 11.69 (bs, 1H, NH);  13 C NMR (125 MHz, DMSO-d 6 ): δ45.9 (CH 2 ), 112.4, 113.2, 116.6, 117.9, 126.7, 130.3, 140.3, 141.7 (Ar—C). 
     3-(3-Azidopropyl)-5-nitro-1H-indole (26).  1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 2.02 (m, 2H, H-2′), 2.90 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H, H-1′), 3.36 (t, J=6.7 Hz, 2H, H-3′), 7.18 (s, 1H, Ar—C), 7.40 (d, J=9.0 Hz, 1H, Ar—C), 8.11 (dd, J=2.1, 9.0 Hz, 1H, Ar—C), 8.48 (s, 1H, NH), 8.57 (d, J=1.8 Hz, 1H, Ar—C).  13 C NMR (125 MHz, MeOD): δ 22.2 (C-1′), 29.5 (C-2′), 51.1 (C-3′), 111.5, 116.6, 118.1, 118.2, 124.9, 127.2, 139.7, 141.9 (Ar—C). 
     General Procedure for In-Situ Click Chemistry Experiments 
     The protein included the Fc portion of human immunoglobulin IgG1 and the three N-terminal domains of murine MAG (for its preparation, see Crocker &amp; Kelm (1996)). The protein used for in-situ click chemistry experiments and K D  determination was in PBS buffer at a concentration of 1 mg/ml and pH 7.4. The K D  analyses were performed at 25° C. on a BIACORE 3000 surface plasmon resonance-based optical biosensor (Biacore AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Protein A (Sigma, Basel) was immobilized onto a CM5 sensor chip (Biacore AB, research grade) using standard amine coupling. All data processing and equilibrium binding constant determinations were accomplished with Scrubber© (BioLogic Software, Campbell, Australia, Version 1.1g). Kinetic data were simultaneously fit using the non-linear regression program Clamp©. The equilibrium binding constants K D  were calculated using a 1:1 binding model. Double referencing was applied to correct for bulk effects and other systematic artifacts. 
     The stock solutions of alkynes 14a-14d (10 mM in H 2 O) and azides (40 mM in DMSO) were prepared. The alkynes (each 4 μl) were added to the stock solution of MAG (94 μl of 1 mg/ml solution, in PBS buffer) in an Eppendorff tube. After 2 min the azide compounds 22 and 26 (each 2 μl) were added. Then the Eppendorff tube was shaken at 37° C. for 24 h. 
     To exclude that the triazoles obtained were false positives, two control experiments were also performed in parallel, one with BSA (94 μl of 1 mg/ml in PBS buffer) and the other in absence of a protein. In the case of ‘absence of protein’ only PBS buffer with pH 7.4 was used. 
     Samples from the above experiment were analyzed by LC-MS (reversed-phase chromatography with ESI mode spectroscopic detection in the negative ion mode with selected ion monitoring of only the expected m/z). Samples of the reactions were directly injected (10 μl). The products were identified by their retention times and molecular weights. The only newly formed product was 27. 
     Independent synthesis of 1-(5-nitro-1H-indol-3-yl-propyl)-4-{sodium [5-acetamido-9-benzamido-3,5,9-trideoxy- D -glycero-α- D -galacto-2-nonulopyranosynate-2-O-yl}-methyl-1,2,3]-triazole (27). To solution of 14a (10 mg, 21.0 μmol) and 26 (5.14 mg, 21.0 mmol) in  t BuOH/H 2 O (1:1) (0.5 ml) was added Na-ascorbate (1.2 mg, 6.00 μmol, 6 μl of a freshly prepared 1 M aqueous solution), followed by CuSO 4 .5H 2 O (0.15 mg, 0.60 μmol) in H 2 O. This heterogeneous mixture was stirred for 36 h. Then the reaction mixture was evaporated to dryness and the residue purified by reversed-phase chromatography (LiCroPrep® RP-8, 5% gradient MeOH in H 2 O). After P2 size-exclusion chromatography and lyophilization from H 2 O, 27 (9 mg, 60%) was obtained as white solid. 
     [α] D  −1.4 (c 0.1, H 2 O);  1 H NMR (500 MHz, D 2 O): δ1.66 (t, J=12.1 Hz, 1H, H-3a), 1.87 (m, 1H, H-2″), 2.02 (s, 3H, NHAc), 2.16 (m, 2H, H-3″), 2.73 (dd, J=4.6, 12.3 Hz, 1H, H-3e), 3.33 (dd, J=4.0, 8.8 Hz, 1H, H-9a), 3.54 (dd, J=1.4, 8.8 Hz, 1H, H-7), 3.69 (dddd, J=1.9, 4.6, 7.1, 9.8 Hz, 1H, H-4), 3.77-3.87 (m, 3H, H-5, H-6, H-9b), 3.91 (dt, J=2.7, 8.8 Hz, 1H, H-8), 4.14 (t, J=6.3 Hz, 1H, H-1″), 4.38, 4.65 (A, B of AB, J=12.0 Hz, 2H, H-1′b), 6.80 (s, 1H, Ar—H), 6.98 (d, J=8.9 Hz, 1H, Ar—H), 7.16 (t, J=7.6 Hz, 2H, Ar—H), 7.26 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H, Ar—H), 7.45-7.51 (m, 4H, Ar—H), 7.54 (s, 1H, Ar—H);  13 C NMR (125 MHz, D 2 O): δ 21.1 (C-3″) 22.4 (NHCO C H 3 ), 29.4 (C-2″), 40.6 (C-3), 43.3 (C-9), 50.1 (C-1″), 52.1 (C-5), 57.4 (C-1′), 68.6 (C-4), 70.6 (C-7), 70.9 (C-8), 73.0 (C-6), 101.0 (C-2), 111.2, 115.7, 116.2, 116.9, 125.2, 125.7, 125.9, 127.1, 128.7, 131.7, 132.9, 139.5, 139.7 (Ar—C), 170.4, 173.4, 175.3 (3CO). 
     It will be appreciated that the methods and kits of the instant invention can be incorporated in the form of a variety of embodiments, only a few of which are disclosed herein. It will be apparent to the artisan that other embodiments exist and do not depart from the spirit of the invention. Thus, the described embodiments are illustrative and should not be construed to limited the invention who is defined only by the appended claims. 
     BIBLIOGRAPHY 
     
         
         Bhunia, A.; Gäthje, H.; Schwardt, O.; Gao, G.-P.; Kelm, S.; Benie, A. J.; Hricovini, M.; Peters, T.; Ernst, B. in preparation. 
         Bourne, Y.; Kolb, H. C.; Radic, Z.; Sharpless, K. B.; Taylor, P.; Marchot, P.  Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA  2004, 101, 1449. 
         Chen, A. S., M J  J Am Chem Soc  1998, 120, 10258-10259. 
         Chen, A. S., M. J.  J Am Chem Soc  2000, 122, 414-415. 
         Claridge, T. D. W. 1999 , High - Resolution NMR Techniques in Organic Chemistry , Elsevier Ltd, Oxford, U. K., ISBN 0-08-042799-5. 
         Collins, B. E.; Ito, H.; Sawada, N.; Ishida, H.; Kiso, M.; Schnarr, R. L.  J. Biol. Chem.  1999, 274, 37637. 
         Crocker, P. R. and Kelm, S. (1996): Methods for studying the cellular binding properties of lectin-like receptors. In Weir&#39;s Handbook of Experimental Immunology, 5. edition, vol. 4, L. A. Herzenberg, D. M. Weir, L. A. (eds.). Herzenberg, C. (Hrsg.), Blackwell Science, Boston, 166.1-166.11. 
         Crocker, P. R.; Clark, E. A.; Filbin, M. T.; Gordon, S.; Jones, Y.; Kehrl, J. H.; Kelm, S.; Le Douarin, N. M.; Powell, L.; Roder, J.; Schnaar, R. L.; Sgroi, D.; Stamenkovic, I.; Schauer, R.; Schachner, M.; Tedder, T.; van den Berg, T. K.; van der Merwe, P. A.; Watt, S. M.; Varki, A. (1998)  Glycobiology  8, Glycoforum 2 v-vi. 
         Dalvit, C., Fogliatto, G. P, Stewart, A, Veronesi, M, Stockman, B.  J Biomol NMR  2000, 18, 65-68. 
         Fejzo, J.; Lepre, C. A.; Peng, J. W.; Bemis, G. W.; Ajay; Murcko, M. A.; Moore, J. M.  Chem Biol  1999, 6, 755-769. 
         Gao, G.-P.; Smiesko, M.; Schwardt, O.; Gäthje, H.; Kelm, S.; Vedani, A.; Beat Ernst, B.  Bioorg. Med. Chem. Submitted.    
         Hajduk, P. J., Olejniczak, E. T, Fesik, S. W.  J Am Chem Soc  1997, 119, 12257-12261. 
         Hotta, K.; Ishida, H.; Hasegawa, A.  J. Carbohydr. Chem.  1995, 14, 491. 
         Ito, H.; Ishida, H.; Ando, S.; Kiso, M.  Glycoconjugate J.  1999, 16, 585. 
         Ito, H.; Ishida H.; Kiso, M.  J. Carbohydr. Chem.  2001, 20, 207. 
         Jahnke, W.; Perez, L. B.; Paris, C. G.; Strauss, A.; Fendrich, G.; Nalin, C. N.  J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2000, 122, 7394. 
         Jencks, W. P.  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.  1981, 78, 4046. 
         Kelm, S.; Pelz, A.; Schauer, R.; Filbin, M. T.; Tang, S.; de Bellard, M. E.; Schnaar, R. L.; Mahoney, J. A.; Hartnell, A.; Bradfield, P.; Crocker, P. R.  Curr. Biol.  1994, 4, 965. 
         Kelm. S.; Brossmer, R.; Isecke, R.; Gross, H.-J.; Strenge, K.; Schauer, R.  Eur. J. Biochem.  1998, 255, 663. 
         Klein, J., Meinecke, R, Mayer, M, Meyer, B.  J Am Chem Soc  1999, 121, 5336-5337. 
         Lewis, W. G.; Green, L. G.; Grynszpan, F.; Radic, Z.; Carlier, P. R.; Taylor, P.; Finn, M. G.; Sharpless, K. B.  Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2002, 41, 1053. 
         Lin, M., Shapiro, M. J.  J Org Chem  1996, 62, 7617-7619. 
         Lin, M. F., Shapiro, M. J, Wareing, J. R.  J Am Chem Soc  1997, 119, 5249-5250. 
         Lin, M., Shapiro, M. J., Wareing, J. R.  J Org Chem  1997, 62, 8930-8931. 
         Mammen, F.; Shakhnovich, E. I.; Whitesides, G. M. J. Org. Chem. 1998, 63, 3168. 
         Manetsch, R.; Krasinski, A.; Radic, Z.; Raushel, J.; Taylor, P.; Sharpless, K. B.; Kolb, H. C.  J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2004, 126, 12809. 
         A. P. May, R. C. Robinson, M. Vinson, P. R. Crocker, E. Y. Jones,  Mol. Cell.  1998, 1, 719-728; Brookhaven protein data bank acquisition code 1QFO. 
         Mayer, M., Meyer, B.  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl  1999, 38. 
         McKerracher, L.; David, S.; Jackson, D. L.; Kottis, V.; Dunn, R. J.; Braun, P. E.  Neuron  1994, 13, 805. 
         McKerracher, L.  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA  2002, 99, 7811. 
         Meyer, B., Weimar, T, Peters. T.  European Journal of Biochemistry  1997, 246, 705-709. 
         Mocharla, V. P.; Colasson, B.; Lee, L. V.; Röper, S.; Sharpless, B. K.; Wong C.-H.; Kolb, H. C.  Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2005, 44, 116. 
         Mukhopadhyay, G.; Doherty, P.; Walsh, F. S.; Crocker, P. R.; Filbin, M. T.  Neuron,  1994, 13, 757. 
         Röper, S.; Kolb, H. C.;  Fragment - based Approaches in Drug Discovery,  2006, 15, 313. 
         Sawada, N.; Ishida, H.; Collins, B. E.; Schnaar, R. L.; Kiso, M.  Carbohydr. Res.  1999, 316, 1. 
         Schwizer, D.; Gäthje, H.; Kelm, S.; Porro, M.; Schwardt, O.; Ernst, B.  Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2006, 14, 4944. 
         Shelke, S. V.; Gan-Pan Gao, G.-P.; Mesch, S.; Gäthje, H.; Kelm, S.; Oliver Schwardt, O.; Ernst, B.  Bioorg. Med. Chem.  2007, in press. 
         Sem, D. S.;  Fragment - based Approaches in Drug Discovery,  2006, 8, 149. 
         Shuker, S. B., Hajduk, P. J., Meadows, R. P., Fesik, S V  Science  1996, 274, 1531-1534. 
         Strenge, K.; Schauer, R.; Bovin, N.; Hasegawa, A.; Ishida, H.; Kiso, M.; Kelm, S.  Eur. J. Biochem.  1998, 258, 677. 
         Vyas, A. A.; Blixt, O.; Paulson, J. C.; Schnaar, R. L.  J. Biol. Chem.  2005, 280, 16305. 
         Vinson, M.; Strijbos, P. J. L. M.; Rowles, A.; Facci, L.; Moore, S. E.; Simmons, D. L.; Walsh, F. S.  J. Biol. Chem.  2001, 276, 20280. 
         Yang, L. J.-S.; Zeller, C. B.; Shaper, N. L.; Kiso, M.; Hasegawa, A.; Shapiro, R. E.; Schnaar, R. L.  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA  1996, 93, 814.