Patent Publication Number: US-6210769-B1

Title: Plastic strapping with modified surface characteristics

Description:
This is a continuation-in-part application based on U.S. Ser. No. 09/106,811, filed Jun. 29, 1998 now abandoned, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 08/629,162 filed Apr. 8, 1996 issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,772,944, which was a divisional application based on U.S. Ser. No. 08/148,301 filed Nov. 8, 1993 issued as U.S. Pat. No. 5,525,391. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND AND SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to polymer strap and methods of producing the same. Steel and plastic strapping are used for a wide variety of applications, often to secure very large coils of steel, synthetic fiber bales and heavy palletized boxes. Steel strapping has advantages in that it has high strength and temperature resistance and outstanding creep resistance. Steel strapping is typically used on heavy loads where high strap strengths and low creep properties are required. However, steel strapping, although very useful in maintaining the quality of the packaging, may be more difficult to dispose of and the strap can have sharp edges. 
     Plastic strap has found particular application to lower strength packaging requirements and represents a less expensive alternative to steel strap. Plastic strap typically has an elastic behavior within limits which allows the strap to remain tight on a package even if the package collapses or somewhat consolidates. The plastic strap is easily disposed of and is safer to use than steel strap because it does not have the dangerous sharp edges of steel strap. Plastic strap is made initially from an extruded strand or sheet, and the polymeric material comprising the extrusion is then oriented, a process which increases the strength of the plastic material to approximately 10 times the unorientated strength of the material. 
     Plastic strap in the market place has generally been limited to applications where a tensile strength of no greater than 65,000 psi is required. Some strap manufacturers have claimed to achieve plastic strap strengths in excess of 75,000 psi using PET after a two-stage stretching technique. See U.S. Pat. No. 4,022,863 to Karass et al. However, the workability and operability of the Karass process is questionable, particularly at the moisture levels discussed in the Karass patent. 
     The creep properties of plastic strapping and the difficulty of securing plastic strap have limited the applications of plastic strapping. The ability to provide a weld with plastic strap is also a limitation which prevents plastic strapping from being used in higher break strength applications. It should be noted that high strength plastic fibers are known, but strapping which combines these fibers with an appropriate support substrate has limited applications. 
     One method of manufacturing plastic strap according to the present invention includes initially forming a molecularly oriented crystalline polyester or polyester copolymer of uniform cross-section which is many times wider than the thickness thereof. The material is oriented by longitudinal stretching at a ratio of at least 5.0 to 1.0. The longitudinal stretching may be carried out at raised temperatures with the material being maintained at this stressed condition until sufficient cooling has taken place. However, for strap with a combination of high strength and low brittleness, the third stretching stage should be conducted at temperatures at or below about 200° F. It has been found that the tensile strength of the strap can be significantly increased to at least 70,000 psi. 
     In one embodiment of the invention, an outer layer of amorphous material is formed on at least one and preferably both sides of the material. The outer layer may be imparted after the material has been extruded and oriented by stretching. This is done by heating the outside surface of the material by, for example, exposing the material to heated rolls. Heating the oriented material causes the molecular structure to lose its orientation, at least in part, to a depth which depends upon the extent to which the temperature of the material is raised. To control brittleness of the core, the material may be chilled just prior to the surface treatment, and may be chilled again just after the surface treatment. The outer layer is preferably unitary and integral with the underlying high strength layer, and preferably has a thickness of at least about 0.0005 inches. Strap made from material formed by the process of the present invention includes a high strength underlying layer which is highly oriented. The strap, when fused to itself via the outer layers, has a joint whose break strength is a function of the break strength of the high strength layer. The outer layer has been found to provide the strap with substantially improved corner strength. The outer layer has been found to resist crack initiation and propagation in the welded strap sections. It has been found with the strap of the present invention that the conventional hot knife welding or fusing techniques can be used to provide a weld between strap sections resulting in a connection having an overall break strength approaching the break strength of at least about 80% of the underlying high strength layer. 
     The formation of an outer amorphous surface by melting the extruded material may have substantial benefit even on strap of moderate strength. The melting of the outer surface improves the weldability of the strap to such an extent that it may be economically feasible to use the surface treatment aspects of the present invention without taking particular advantage of any potentially high strength of the core material. 
     The objects and advantages of the present invention will be better understood upon a reading of the following specification read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     FIG. 1 is a schematic of the apparatus and method for carrying out the present invention; 
     FIG. 2 is an enlarged schematic view of the formation of an outer layer of the strap of the present invention; 
     FIG. 3 is a creep strain versus time graph showing high tensile strength steel, high strength polyethylene terephthalate according to the present invention and conventional polyethylene terephthalate strap; 
     FIG. 4 is a stress relaxation graph of various strap products; 
     FIG. 5 is a plot of strap strength versus joint efficiency; and 
     FIG. 6 is a graph showing strap brittleness versus drawing temperatures. 
     FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of a coextrusion die useable to make strap in accordance with the present invention. 
     FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of strapping made in accordance with the present invention. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The manufacture of the high strength strap of the present invention generally entails the use of a combination of equipment long known for its use in the manufacture of plastic strap. 
     FIG. 1 shows a schematic diagram of an arrangement of equipment which could be used to make strap in accordance with the present invention. Polyester material having intrinsic viscosity of between about 0.6 and about 0.8 is preferred for making strap in accordance with the present invention, although material with other intrinsic viscosity may be usable. The material is processed by conventional drying system and the material is dried at approximately 320° F. for at least 4 hours to produce a moisture level of less than 0.005%. The dried pellets are then fed to a conventional plastic extruder  2 . The pellets are rendered flowable in the extruder by melting at approximately 490° F. and then forced through a gear pump which maintains uniform output of the molten plastic material which is forced through a die  4 . The die produces a continuous rectangular cross section of extruded material  1  which may be a single strand, multiple strands or a sheet intended to be subsequently slit into individual straps. After exiting the die  4 , the extruded material immediately enters a water bath  6  at about 80° F. to solidify the molten polyester material into a continuous amorphous state. 
     Referring again to FIG. 1, air in the oven  8  is maintained at a temperature of approximately 175° F., and the rolls in the heating oven  8  are arranged such that the material is not elongated in the oven but is merely heated to the desired temperature. A first series of godet rolls  9  controls the speed of the material through the heating oven  8 . The material, as it exits from engagement with the first godet rolls  9 , passes into a first orientation oven  10 . This oven is maintained at a temperature of about 175° F. A second series of godet rolls  11  operate at a speed approximately 370% of the speed of the first series godet rolls  9 . The material then passes through a second orientation oven  12  which is at a temperature of about 250° F. Uniform temperature is important to control the stretch point. A third series of godet rolls  13  have a speed of approximately 135% of the speed of the second series of godet rolls  11 . This results in a stretch ratio of about 5.0 to 1.0 after the first two stretch stages. 
     A further orientation oven  14  is maintained at a temperature of approximately 75° F., or higher, depending upon the desired break strength and brittleness, as discussed below. A fourth series of godet rolls  15  may operate at various speeds, but in one example operated at a speed of 120% of the third series of godet rolls  13 . This is followed by an annealing oven  16 , and the speed of the material through the annealing oven  16  is controlled by the fifth series of godet rolls  17 . The speed of the fifth series of godet rolls  17 , with respect to the fourth series of godet rolls  13  is 97%, i.e. the material is allowed to relax slightly. 
     When the material exits from the fifth series of godet rolls  17 , it is passed through a cooling bath  18  which cools the strap to about room temperature while maintaining the tension in the material  1 . The material  1  is then chilled by chill rolls  19  to bring the temperature of the material well below room temperature. The refrigerated fluid is circulated in the chill roll  19 . Then, a first side of the material  1  is exposed to a heated roll  20 . A second chill roll  22  immediately contacts the treated amorphous outer layer. Basically, these surface treating rolls  20  and  21  provide sufficient heat to both sides of the material to melt its surface, rendering it amorphous. It is preferred that the outer layer be on both sides of the material, and that the thickness of the outer layer on each side be approximately 0.0005 of an inch. The surface treating also serves to flatten the material, rendering it uniformly shaped on the surfaces to be welded, which makes the material superior for purposes of welding a joint. 
     FIG. 2 shows a detail in schematic form of the process by which the material  1  is surface treated by a heated roller. The untreated surface material  25  of the material  1  comes into contact with the outer surface  26  of the heated roller  20  (which is at about 1000° F.) when the material  1  has just come off the chill roller  19  and is substantially below room temperature, for example, at about 0° F. As the material  1  continues its contact with the heated roller  20 , the depth of surface melting increases and, because the core has been chilled, the temperature gradient across the thickness of the material  1  is steep. If it is desired to manufacture a strap having high strength, it is important to keep as much of the core as possible from reaching temperatures which would cause the core to lose its crystalline, oriented and high strength structure and cause the core to become brittle. 
     A number of straps may be simultaneously extruded and passed through the same equipment in a side-by-side relationship. This arrangement is generally shown in FIG. 1 as evidenced by the separate winders  28  at the winding station  24 . However, it is also possible to extrude a sheet and cut or slit the sheet into appropriate strap widths at the end of the manufacturing process just before the material is wound. 
     The sheet method and the individual strand method of extruding and treating the material each have their advantages and disadvantages. For example, extruding a sheet may give more consistency from strap to strap with respect to strap profile. However, individual strand extrusion may provide the manufacturer with more flexibility in the manufacturing process. Further, one of the methods may require more set-up time, labor or capital investment than the other. 
     The surface treatment which results in the formation of the outer layer of the strap of the present invention is shown in FIG. 1 to be accomplished with heated rolls, but it should be noted that the heating could also be achieved by exposing the material to flame, heated air, or other techniques for raising the temperature of a surface. Similarly, the chilling of the material, while shown in FIG. 1 as being done with chill rolls, could be accomplished in other ways. For example, the material could be run through a chamber containing cool gas such as CO 2  at 0° F. 
     As used in this specification, the term “amorphous” is intended to include materials which are completely unoriented, substantially unoriented, and partially unoriented. 
     It has been found that a total stretch ratio of at least 5 to 1 can significantly increase the amount of orientation in the strap and the break strength can be significantly increased as a result. When using polyethylene terephthalate (PET), it has been found that a break strength of at least 70,000 psi can be accomplished, while the strap has improved properties with respect to creep resistance and stress relaxation. Further improvements in these properties can be obtained by using a stretch rate of at least 6 to 1. How-ever, as shown in FIG.  6  and Table 1 below, such increased strength may result in increased brittleness as measured by crack length. 
     It has also been possible to obtain strap of high break strength and good creep and stress relaxation properties by using a process where the strap undergoes an initial stretching of approximately 3.7 to 1 followed by a further stretching of about 1.35 to 1 for a stretch ratio after two stretching stages of about 5.0 to 1.0. The first and second stretching occur at a temperature preferably in the range of about 175° F. to 250° F., respectively. When stretched a third time at a stretch ratio of 1.2, significant improvements are obtained in tensile strength. See the following Table 1. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 EXAMPLES OF DIFFERENT PROCESSING CONDITIONS 
               
               
                 WITH RESULTANT PROPERTIES 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Example No. 3 3a 
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Example No. 1 
                 Example No. 2 
                   
                   
                   
                 With 
                 Example No. 4 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Stage 
                 Stage 
                 Stage 
                 Stage 
                 Stage 
                 Stage 
                 Stage 
                 Stage 
                 Stage 
                 surface 
                 Stage 
                 Stage 
                 Stage 
               
               
                   
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
                 treatment 
                 1 
                 2 
                 3 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Temperature (° F.) 
                 175 
                 250 
                 75 
                 175 
                 250 
                 190 
                 175 
                 250 
                 270 
                 — 
                 175 
                 250 
                 330 
               
               
                 Draw Ratio 
                 3.7 
                 1.35 
                 1.2 
                 3.7 
                 1.35 
                 1.2 
                 3.7 
                 1.35 
                 1.35 
                 — 
                 3.7 
                 1.35 
                 1.4 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 
                   
                     
                       
                         
                           
                             Resultant Properties 
                           
                         
                         
                           Total Draw Ratio 
                         
                       
                     
                     
                     
                         
                     
                   
                 
                 3.7 
                 5.0 
                 6.0 
                 3.7 
                 5.0 
                 6.0 
                 3.7 
                 5.0 
                 6.75 
                 — 
                 3.7 
                 5.0 
                 7 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Surface Treat Depth (mils) 
                 0 
                 0 
                 0 
                 0 
                 0 
                 0 
                 0 
                 0 
                 0 
                 1.0 
                 0 
                 0 
                 0 
               
               
                 Tensile Strength 
                 — 
                 58 
                 73 
                 — 
                 58 
                 105 
                 — 
                 58 
                 140 
                 125 
                 — 
                 58 
                 150 
               
               
                 Elongation 
                 — 
                 28 
                 — 
                 — 
                 28 
                 — 
                 — 
                 28 
                 10 
                 10 
                 — 
                 28 
                 7 
               
               
                 Crack Length 
                 — 
                 0 
                 0 
                 — 
                 0 
                 0.1 
                 — 
                 0 
                 1.1 
                 0.25 
                 — 
                 0 
                 2.1 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     When the material is PET, this results in highly orientated strap which has high break strength and also demonstrates improved properties with respect to brittleness, one manifestation of which is the tendency for the strap to split along its length when under tension. It has also been found that the temperature range of the third stretching stage is particularly important with respect to controlling the amount of brittleness. By stretching at higher temperatures, the high strength strap tends to be more brittle and more likely to separate along its length, whereas improved ductility can be obtained at a lower temperature. Table 1 also shows, in Example 3a, a substantial benefit in the form of reduced crack length (brittleness) which results from the surface treatment of the Example 3 product. 
     Creep 
     FIG. 3 shows creep strain versus time for various strapping materials. It can be seen that the high tensile strength steel  100  essentially had no creep strain increase from its initial point for 1,000 hours. Similarly, the high strength PET strap  102  has the same flat line characteristic as conventional steel strap. Conventional PET strap loaded to a creep stress of 45,000 psi has a substantial creep strain over the 1,000 hour time period and high strength polypropylene strap has a high creep strain (even at half the creep stress used to test the high strength PET) which increases with time. 
     Stress Relaxation 
     FIG. 4 shows the stress relaxation properties of a) high tensile steel strap; b) a high strength PET strap made in accordance with the present invention; c) a conventional PET strap; and d) a high strength polypropylene strap. The initial stress applied to each of the straps is shown in the legend associated with the graph of FIG.  4 . As can be seen, the high tensile strength steel had essentially no stress relaxation—remaining at 100% of its initial tension over the 1,000 hour time period. The high strength PET strap having an applied stress of 75,000 psi initially started at 95% and fell to approximately 88% after 1,000 hours. In contrast, the conventional PET strap indicated as  104  initially started at about 88% and dropped to approximately 60% after the 1,000 hours, even though the initial tension is only 60% of the tension on the high strength PET strap. The high strength polypropylene strap indicated as  106  had a much more severe drop—which is what might be expected with this type of material. 
     Joint Strength 
     According to one aspect of the invention, it has been found that the PET strap can be manufactured with an a amorphous layer on both sides, which improves the ease with which the strap may be effectively joined. When conventional hot knife fusing techniques are used, the amorphous layer of the present invention has been found to improve the strap&#39;s ability to resist progressive separation between the joined layers of the strap at the weld. When a joint in the strap of the present invention is formed by welding a sufficiently large area of the amorphous layer on one side of the strap to the amorphous layer on the opposite side of the strap, the high strength underlying layer of the strap then effectively determines the maximum break strength of the strap/joint combination. Preferably, the outer layer is of a depth of at least 0.0005 inch, and is amorphous. It has been found that a joint having a break strength of at least 75% of the break strength of the high strength layer is easily accomplished. This percentage is referred to as joint efficiency. The outer layer of the strap of the present invention enables the increased break strength obtained by using the proposed orientation methods to be utilized. 
     Table 2 below shows various straps and their joint strengths. The joints with the plastic straps are based on hot knife welds, whereas the strength based on the high tensile steel strap is based on a sealess joint. As can be seen from Table 2, the high strength PET strap, surface treated on both sides, has a high joint efficiency and high break load due to the high ultimate strength of the underlying layer. In this case, a break strength of 1660 lbs. was achieved. Therefore, the high efficiency weld in combination with the high strength of the plastic strap gives a very high maximum load and properties which can greatly increase the applications for plastic strap. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 JOINT STRENGTH 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                   
                 Joint 
                   
               
               
                   
                 Break 
                 Break 
                 Strength 
                 Joint 
               
               
                   
                 Strength 
                 Load 
                 as % of 
                 Strength 
               
               
                 STRAP 
                 (KSPI) 
                 (Lbs.) 
                 Break Load 
                 (Lbs.) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 High Tensile Steel 
                 140 
                 2100 
                 76% 
                 1600*  
               
               
                 (¾″ × .020″) 
               
               
                 High Strength PET 
                 145 
                 2175 
                 32% 
                  700**  
               
               
                 (w/o Surface Treatment) 
               
               
                 (½″ × 0.030″) 
               
               
                 High Strength PET 
                 130 
                 1950 
                 85% 
                 1660** 
               
               
                 Surface Treated 
               
               
                 (½″ × 0.30″) 
               
               
                 Conventional PET 
                  65 
                 1300 
                 80% 
                 1040** 
               
               
                 (⅝″ × .032″) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 *SEALESS JOINT  
               
               
                 **HOT KNIFE WELDS  
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Both surfaces of the strap are treated to obtain a thin surface layer. Treating a PET strap with the surface treatment of the present invention results in a lowering of the strength of the strap by about 11%, i.e. from an initial (without surface treatment) strength of 147 kpsi to a treated strength of about 130 kpsi. FIG. 5 shows the effect of surface treating on the maximum joint efficiency of high strength PET strap. The surface treating depth, as determined by optical microscopy, was 0.0015″ per side on a strap 0.021″ thick. The 130 kpsi, double surface treated PET strap was welded by hot knife welding. With a surface treatment of the present invention, the strap had a joint efficiency of 0.85. Also tested were 115 kpsi and 101 kpsi strength, double surface treated PET strap samples with single surface melting depths of 0.0015″ and 0.0017″, respectively. Their maximum joint efficiencies were 0.79 and 0.75, respectively. 
     Observation of weak and strong welds of double surface treated, high strength PET strap indicates that the weak welds were those where the welding process destroyed the surface layer, thus exposing the oriented material that is susceptible to crack initiation. The strong welds were those in which the surface melted layer adjacent to the ends of the welds was intact, thus protecting the core oriented material from crack initiation. 
     The surface fracture energy in the machine direction of oriented polyester, as determined by standard tear and cleavage tests, is usually a small percentage of the fracture energy of the unoriented material. The surface fracture energy of a material is a measure of the ability of the material to withstand formation of new fracture surfaces. A material with high surface fracture energy is much more resistant to crack initiation and/or propagation. 
     The amorphous layers at the ends of the welds are believe to resist crack initiation as a lap joint is loaded. This resistance allows the joint to carry more load before failure, thus resulting in a higher joint strength and efficiency. 
     Brittleness 
     Although high strength PET strap made in accordance with the present invention can be produced by using a third stretching stage temperature from about 75° F. up to 330° F., the preferred range for producing high strength PET strap is below about 200° F., unless brittleness is not a concern. Although it is believed 200° F. is the maximum temperature in the third stage of drawing, for applications where brittleness is not an important factor, higher temperatures may be used to obtain higher strength strap. FIG. 6 is a graph showing the effect of drawing temperature on brittleness. The line on the graph shows points of maximum attainable strength of various drawing temperatures. The data in the graph is for strap treated with three drawing stages, and the drawing temperatures along the horizontal axes of the graph are for the temperatures of the third drawing stage only. The first two drawing steps were conducted at temperatures corresponding to those used to make conventional PET strap. It should also be noted that the data in the graph of FIG. 6 is for strap which had no outer surface of amorphous material. 
     As shown below, there is a significant relationship between strap brittleness and increased depth of surface treatment. Table 3 illustrates the percentage improvement in crack length with surface treating depth. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Effect of Surface Treating Depth on Strap Brittleness 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Surface Treating 
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Depth* (mils) 
                 Crack Length (in) XX   
                 % Improvement 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   0 (128 kpsi) 
                 1.82 
                 N/A 
               
               
                   
                 0.8 (121 kpsi) 
                 1.39 
                 24 
               
               
                   
                 1.2 (113 kpsi) 
                 0.87 
                 52 
               
               
                   
                 2.0 (96 kpsi) 
                 0.32 
                 82 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 *Single surface treat depth  
               
               
                   
                   XX Crack length was measured by using a Split Test. This test comprises the application of a steel pointed penetrator into a strap sample at a controlled rate and depth of penetration. This sequence is automated on a pneumatically driven, solenoid activated apparatus for rapid and repetitive penetrator applications. After 20-30 cracks have been produced, they are individually measured and the average is obtained.  
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The surface of the high strength PET strap of one embodiment of the present invention is treated to produce a thin melted skin on the strap surface. Melting the skin on the strap results in some strength loss, which loss is dependent on the surface treating depth. When a strap with a thin amorphous layer is welded, it is believed that the amorphous layer provides the joint with a high crack initiation resistant (fracture energy) material which suppresses crack initiation at the ends of the lap joint under load. 
     Effect of Surface Treating on Corner Strength 
     The purpose of strapping is to hold packages or products in place during shipment. The initial application of strapping involves the tensioning of the strap around the product or package. Items requiring strapping have various ranges of corner radii for a strap to follow. In cases where the radius is very small (e.g. when strapping bricks), the strap can experience very high bending and tensile strains on the outer surface side of the strap around a corner. High strength PET strap has a much lower tensile failure strain (10-12%) as compared to conventional PET strap (20-30%). Thus, the ability of high strength PET strap to perform in applications where radii are sharp is an important consideration. 
     Strap having an initial strength of 147 kpsi was surface treated to produce an amorphous surface layer of 0.0015 ″ on each side, and the resulting strap had 130 kpsi strength. Strap with surface treatment showed an increase in corner strength by a factor of about 4 as compared to untreated high strength strap. In another test, it was found that high strength PET strap which was not surface treated had a 22,000 psi corner strength, whereas the same strap which had been surface treated on either side thereof to produce an amorphous layer of about 0.0012 of an inch had a corner strength of 63,000 psi. Therefore, surface treating high strength PET strap produces improved corner strength over the untreated, high strength PET strap. This is believed to be due to the creation of a surface layer capable of a high degree of elongation which can stretch to higher strains without failure. 
     Effect of Surface Treating on Strap Thickness Profile 
     The manufacture of conventional plastic strapping via the individual strand process results in a strap which is thicker on the edges of the strap than in the center. This is a result of the way in which the strand exits the extrusion die before being drawn, and also of the drawing process itself. Slit strap is produced from rolled sheets and therefore dimensions can be more accurately maintained. A flat profile allows for the formation of efficient friction welded joints. Welding techniques are not known to be as efficient for strap produced by a strand process due to the curved profile of such strap. The presence of peaks can result in welds that possess voids and other interface variations which result in lower joint strength relative to comparable strap made via a sheet slitting process where the strap is much more uniform. 
     The surface treating of the present invention produces improved uniformity in the thickness profile across the strap width. Typically, strap produced at 0.023″ thickness has a profile that possesses a maximum thickness variation across the width of plus or minus 0.0001″, and strap produced via a conventional individual strand process typically has a thickness variation across the width of plus or minus 0.0005 ″. Melting of the surface in accordance with the present invention smoothes out the peaks in the strap thickness, producing, in effect, a flat strap. This results in improved weld strengths and allows use of the strap made by the individual strand technique in strapping machines that normally require strap made by the sheet-slit technique. Preferably, the surface layers are produced by passing the strap over heated rollers, but may also be done with hot air, flame or other melting techniques. This allows strap made as single strand to effectively compete with sheet slit strap. This is of significant commercial importance for manufacturers of individual strand strap. It has also been discovered that heat treating the edges of the strap of the present invention at various stages facilitates the stretching of the strap which is helpful to obtain the high degree of orientation and resulting high strength. Stretching polyester strap often results in the edges of the strap becoming more highly oriented than the center area of the strap. It is also understood that orienting the strap material tends to reduce the elongation of the material, i.e. it reduces the ability of the material to s The use of direct flame (i.e. a natural gas burner) applied to the edges of the strap with enough heat to disorient the, preferably, and the timing of such heat treatment is preferably done at least prior to the first stretching prevents premature breakage of the strap during a drawing operation. It is also beneficial to treat the strap with heat (preferably, but not limited to flame treatment) between drawing steps, and after drawing is completed. Edge melting of polypropylene strap is know, but is done for purposes of eliminating or reducing the adverse effects of loose fibers which form on the surface of polypropylene. See U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,394,045 and 4,090,008. However, fibers do not form on PET strapping. Nevertheless, heat treatment of the edges of PET strap, as discussed above, at various times during the creation of high strength strap in accordance with this invention, both the surface treated embodiment and the coextruded embodiment (discussed below) is beneficial. 
     Mechanical Properties 
     The creation of an amorphous skin on the surface of high strength PET strap reduces its load bearing capacity because of the low strength amorphous layer making up some of the strap cross-sectional area. As the depth of the surface treating layer increases, the strength of the overall strap will decrease (see Table 4 below). The upper limit of the melt depth range is determined by the strength required in the final strap. For practical purposes, the total strength drop should probably not exceed 25% of the original strap strength, otherwise the benefit of the strengthening which results from orientation is significantly diminished. The lower limit of the surface treatment is about 0.0005″, which is the lowest practical value reproducible on conventional equipment. Conventional PET strap is manufactured in the 0.20″-0.040″ range. Thus, the practical range of melt depth is about 0.0005″ to about 0.005″. The preferred range is about 0.0005″ to about 0.003″, depending on the strap thickness. In terms of percent, the range is from about 0.6% to about 12.5%, with the preferred range being from about 1% to about 7.5%. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Effect of Surface Treating on Mechanical Properties 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Total Melt Depth 
                 Strap Strength 
                 Strap Modulus 
                 Strap Elongation 
               
               
                 (mils) 
                 (kpsi) 
                 (kpsi) 
                 (%) 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 0 
                 128.7 
                 1666 
                 11.0 
               
               
                 1.63 
                 121.3 
                 1462 
                 11.7 
               
               
                 2.4 
                 112.8 
                 1413 
                 10.8 
               
               
                 3.9 
                 103.8 
                 1373 
                 11.0 
               
               
                 4.1 
                 96.3 
                 1249 
                 11.8 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     In addition to improvements in tensile strength obtained by the strap of the present invention, tensile modulus, or stiffness, of the strap is also improved. The term stiffness is more commonly used in the strapping field. Increased stiffness is important in strapping because strap must be stiff enough to be fed through chutes in strapping machines. This is particularly important in large strapping machines because the chutes are longer. Longer chutes means that buckling and jamming in the machine are more likely. Low stiffness limits the use of certain sizes of polypropylene (PP) strapping. 
     Table 5 below indicates typical tensile moduli values of conventional PP and PET strap, along with various strength and high strength PET strap. Most strapping applications in large strapping machines require a strap with substantial stiffness, which may be achieved by a combination of high tensile modulus and increased strap thickness. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Typical Moduli of Plastic Strapping 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Strap 
                 Modulus (kpsi)*** 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 PP (54 kpsi) 
                  319 
               
               
                   
                 Conventional PET (65 kpsi) 
                  967 
               
               
                   
                  75 kpsi H.S. PET* 
                 1052 
               
               
                   
                  85 kpsi H.S. PET* 
                 1071 
               
               
                   
                  97 kpsi H.S. PET* 
                 1152 
               
               
                   
                 101 kpsi H.S. PET* 
                 1205 
               
               
                   
                 110 kpsi H.S. PET* 
                 1239 
               
               
                   
                 126 kpsi H.S. PET* 
                 1358 
               
               
                   
                 133 kpsi H.S. PET* 
                 1596 
               
               
                   
                 147 kpsi H.S. PET* 
                 1799 
               
               
                   
                  143 kpsi H.S. PET** 
                 1921 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 *Strap made at 320° F.  
               
               
                   
                 **Strap made at 500° F.  
               
               
                   
                 ***Tested at 0.2% offset  
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Table 5 shows that high strength PET strap made in accordance with the present invention shows a marked improvement in tensile modulus, as compared with conventional PET strap, and is far superior to polypropylene strap in tensile modulus. 
     The Coextruded Embodiment 
     The outer layer of the strap of the present invention may also be imparted to the oriented core of the material by a co-extrusion process in which two or more materials are initially extruded. Coextrusion may be performed by the use of any of various prior art techniques such as the one shown and described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,247,591. The core or innermost layer should be a polyester or polyester copolymer, preferably a polyethylene terephthalate or copolymer thereof. However, the outer layer should be a material such as PETG (1,4-cyclohexanediamethanol), PCTG (1,4-cyclohexylene-dimethylene-ethylene terephthalate), or blends of PET and additives sold by Rohm and Haas under the trademark PARALOID. The outer co-extruded layer must be compatible with polyester so that it will fuse to the core. Alternatively, an intermediate co-extruded layer may be used to make the outer layer unitary with the core. If the coextrusion technique is used, it may be unnecessary to heat the material in order to create an outer layer with a suitably amorphous character to provide the strap with non-brittleness, weldability and corner strength. In addition, a multi-layer extrusion technique could be used if an outer layer is desired which does not bond, by itself, to the PET core. It may be desirable to extrude an intermediate layer between the core and the outer layer. 
     Coextruding a strap having a PET core and a skin made of an impact modified PET-based material is a way of producing a strap of high tensile strength of greater than about 70 kpsi and commercially required properties of low brittleness, high weldability, high corner strength at economically viable costs. Coextrusion is a widely applied technology used in a vast number of industries and products. It is a way of effecting site specific and desired properties. Coextruded materials are comprised of a multilayer structure. This technique allows the formation of a structure having the properties of two or more materials otherwise unattainable by physically blending two components. 
     A cross-section of a triple layer coextrusion die useable to coextrude strapping is shown in FIG.  7 . The skin material is introduced into the die through both the upper channel  55  and the lower channel  57 , while the core material is formed by feeding material through center channel  56 . The coextruded strap exits the die at port  58 . The ratio of the amount of material used to form the skin to amount of material use to form the core is generally set by a mass flowrate controller typically found on extrusion machines. Depending upon the volume of the core, the volume of the skin will be about 3 to about 10 percent of the volume of the core, and will preferably be about 5 to about 10 percent. The thickness of the skin will generally not vary with the thickness of the overall strap, and the thickness of the skin after stretching should be about 0.5 to about 2 mils, and should preferably be about 1 mil to about 2 mils in thickness, generally without regard to the overall size of the strap. Thus, in larger sizes of strap, the skin of the strap will generally be less in percentage of the overall volume of the strap as compared to smaller sizes of strap. The pivoting guides  52  and  53  are also used to control the thickness of the skin. The skin thickness will vary depending upon the is overall size of the strap, but is generally about 1 to 3 mils (i.e. 0.001 inch to about 0.003 inch) per side. 
     FIG. 8 shows cross-sections of two embodiments of a coextruded strap made in accordance with the present invention. The strap  1  core  60 , an upper skin portion  64  and a lower skin portion  65 . The left lateral edge  61  of the core is only exposed, i.e. it is not covered with skin material, and the right lateral edge  62  is more exposed. It is possible that the edges be covered with skin material, depending upon the extrusion process, the configuration of the extrusion dies and the rates at which the core and skin materials are fed through the extruder. Instead of leaving a portion of the core exposed, it may be desirable to completely encase the core with skin material. Complete enclosure of the core may be beneficial if the skin material has higher notch resistance, or if covering the core with skin material makes the strap feed through strapping machinery more easily. On the other hand, leaving the edges of the core exposed may allow use of less skin material, which is likely to be more expensive than the core. To compensate for the lack of skin material at the edge of the strap, the core may be softened and rendered amorphous (such as by heating) to eliminate or reduce notch sensitivity of the edge of the strap. 
     In the context of the manufacture of high-strength strapping, the properties which are believed to control weldability, brittleness and corner strength are skin toughness and/or high failure elongation. Peel resistance, notched izod strength, tear strength and dart impact are not commonly measured in standard strapping materials, i.e. materials made of a single type of material where the chemical structure of the skin and core are essentially the same, but are useful measures of toughness, which is an important property in achieving weldability in accordance with this invention. A skin which has been surface melted and/or coextruded, as per the present invention, may not by itself have high toughness and/or high elongation and/or high shear strength when compared to typical impact modified materials. However, what is important for purposes of this invention is that the skin possess higher elongation and/or increased toughness as compared to the core material which carries the skin. For example, one could coextrude a skin on the strap, but if the skin oriented in such a way so as to not produce high elongation and or toughness, then a beneficial strap would not result. Therefore, there are certain criteria for the skin material that are important to achieve in the final product in order to produce the desired results. 
     Surface melting produces high weldability and good corner strength, but can result in a strap with increased brittleness. A melted skin of a non-coextruded PET strap would have higher elongation than as compared to its core, because it has been rendered amorphous, but would not have high toughness as compared to typical impact modified plastics. Adding impact modifiers to the material comprising the skin of the strap is an alternative way to increase the elongation of the strap, even when oriented material is included in the skin. The use of impact modifiers in the skin of a strap where the skin is coextruded may be used in conjunction with a surface melting. This combination may be useful where it is desired to use heat (or other softening means) to remove peaks and valleys thereby obtaining a very smooth surface on the strap (to facilitate the formation of a good weld), and to do so on a strap which has been coextruded with a toughened skin, as discussed herein. 
     Orientation of polymers into films generally reduces the tear or peel resistance as compared to the original unoriented material. This reduction is believed to reduce the weldability or joint strength of the strapping, since a weld usually fails in peel. Therefore, use of a highly oriented PET strapping, to obtain high tensile strength, aggravates the problems associated with welding. Although the mechanics of peel strength in a lap joint are quite complicated, the underlying material property of peel resistance is strongly related the joint carrying capability of a joint. Thus, the properties engineered into the skin via coextrusion and/or surface melting are important for joint strength enhancement in a highly oriented PET strapping. As discussed herein, surface melting produces commercially attractive high strength PET properties. However, it can also result in increased brittleness in the strap. Thus, coextrusion of a core and a skin, although more complex from a manufacturing standpoint, may be a viable alternative to achieving desired properties economically. 
     Problems of compatibility of the materials to be coextruded are significant. For example, a PET core must have a skin which will have sufficient interfacial adhesion. It is possible to overcome this problem with a third interlayer (or tie layer), but use of this solution adds complexity and cost, because coextrusion of three separate materials is much more difficult than extruding one or two materials. 
     Simply selecting a skin material on the basis of its toughness properties can be problematic, because such materials have glass transition temperatures (T g ) which can differ from T g  of the core. This difference in glass transition temperature may cause difficulties in optimizing all of the properties needed to obtain a high strength strap having good weldability. For example, orientation and crystallization of the skin at PET core temperatures may be very different, and this difference may cause processing limitations, such as stretchability, tensile strength, brittleness and delamination. Choices for the skin are Kodar PET and copolymers that are tougher than PET, such as PETG, Eastar PCTG (From Eastman Chemical Company—See Publication MBS-94A, August 1997). PETG and PCTG have glass transition temperatures of about 81° C. and about 87° C., respectively, which differ from the glass transition temperature for PET, which is about 71° C. Strap made of a PET core and a PETG skin exhibit low joint strengths not significantly higher than strap made solely of PET after such strap has been stretched sufficiently to obtain the degree of core orientation necessary for high tensile strength. The low joint strength is believed to be due to the delamination at the skin/core interface. 
     Similarly, strap coextruded with a PET core and a skin of PCTG (with its T g  substantially higher than that of PET) results in a strap in which it is difficult to obtain core orientation required for high tensile strength. Welds with this strap have even greater delamination as compared to PET with a skin of PETG. Skins with blends of PET and PETG and blends of PET and PCTG are problematic in a coextruded strap with a PET core from the standpoint of adhesion. Another key problem in using PETG or PCTG relates to the difficulties of recycling these materials, based upon their relatively low glass transition temperatures. The ability to recycle strap is important, and drying steps associated with recycling require that the plastics in the material to be recycled have glass transition temperatures which are high enough so that the material does not bind to itself during a drying step. 
     To overcome such problems, a solution is to use PET as the base for a skin matrix, but to engineer high elongation and toughness into the skin. This is beneficial from the standpoints of obtaining good adhesion, reducing cost, achieving high core orientation and reduced brittleness. By engineering only the PET-based skin, instead of the entire PET strap, the amount of materials used to engineer, modify and toughen the skin (which materials are generally expensive) can be minimized and the PET core (without the materials needed to modify the skin) can be oriented to obtain high strength. 
     Toughening of polymers can be accomplished by a variety of means. Most methods involve utilizing a secondary material, i.e. an impact modifier, dispersed within the main material to be toughened, such that under impact loading, the dispersed material results in crazing and other energy absorbing mechanisms not found in the original material. The mechanism of weldability enhancement is not fully understood. Thus, there may me materials which are not typically considered impact modifiers, but which if added to PET will nevertheless result in a strap with higher elongation, toughness and therefore weldability. 
     Given that the load carrying core material is preferably a PET based material which can be made to have high strength by orientation, the skin material should preferably also be comprised of a PET based material to facilitate adhesion to the core material, otherwise load bearing transfer across the joint may be reduced. In addition, PET only or slight copolymers of PET are economically preferred host materials, since the materials used to modify polymers such as PET are generally expensive. 
     There are various ways to toughen PET or PET copolymer based materials. A summary of these can be found in the following sources: 1) L. A. Utracki, Polymer  Alloys &amp; Blends , Hanser Publishers, 1989; 2) S. Datta and David Lohse,  Polymeric Compatibilizers , Hanser Publishers, 1996: 3) I. Miles and S. Rostami,  Multicoponent Polymer Systems , Longman Scientific &amp; Technical, 1992. The toughening techniques generally involve dispersing an elastomeric, rubber or other inherently tough thermoplastic (such as polycarbonate) material into a PET host matrix by extrusion. Important requirements for the impact modifiers are: cost, compatibility with the host matrix, a glass transition temperature low enough not to disturb the orientation of the PET core, and ability to be extrusion blended, i.e. the ability to become dispersed in PET in an extrusion process. 
     It has been found that unless the impact (i.e. toughness) modifier is compatible with the matrix material and dispersed to sufficient fineness of particle size, toughening and elongation enhancement does not occur as might be expected from simple volume ratio calculations. Typically, these blends are produced in twin screw extruders, because of the high pressures required to extrude them. Under certain conditions of temperature, screw design, shear rate, resin and impact modifier type, a conventional single screw extruder may he utilized to effect the desired results. Economics require that the simplest extrusion configuration, the most readily available PET, the least expensive compatible impact modifier, and least amount of impact modifier be used to achieve the desired properties in order to compete with existing PET strapping and other strapping materials, such as steel. 
     PCTG, certain PBT grades and PET containing Paraloids (a proprietary butyl-acrylate based product sold by Rohm and Haas—See brochure of Rohm and Haas, Inc. Key: 889751-7 for PARALOID EXL-3330) are examples of potentially suitable impact modifiers. For example, a blend of 80 parts PET and 20 parts Paraloid EXL 3330, by weight (an “80/20 blend”), was produced by twin screw extrusion. This blended material was oriented and annealed to produce a strap-like material at PET core temperatures and stretch ratios and exhibited high toughness and elongation, and low brittleness as compared to a PET only control strap. The incorporation of tougheners, such as rubber (i.e. elastomer) in the PET results in greatly increased elongation, toughness, and lowered brittleness. 
     The above mentioned an 80/20 blend of PET and Paraloid EXL 3330 blend was coextruded onto a PET core and high strength PET strap (Example 1) was produced. A control coextrusion without rubber was also produced. These materials exhibited similar strength and elongation. Thus, the relatively small amount of rubber in the overall strap did not disrupted or adversely affect the base PET orientation properties. The rubber-containing coextruded strap exhibited significantly higher weldability and lower brittleness as compared to the control strap. 
     This high strength, coextruded PET/rubber skin strap was welded and compared to the control. The results showed weld efficiencies of 50% for the control, and 80-90% for the coextruded blend. It should be noted that weldability (or weld efficiency) is expressed in terms of a percentage, i.e. the tensile strength of a section with a weld as a percentage of the tensile strength of the same strap without a weld. This clearly illustrates that the use of a skin comprised of an amorphous polymer such as a rubber in a PET matrix can enhance toughness and/or elongation, and that the result is a strap with high strength and improved weldability. 
     A similar strap (Example 2) was produced with a coextruded skin comprised of a 70/30 blend of PET and ROYALTUF 330, a proprietary modified EPDM (ethylene/propylene/non-conjugated diene) elastomer sold by Uniroyal Chemical Company, Inc. The resulting strap showed good weldability (80% to 90%) compared to the control strap. 
     Another strap (Example 3) was produced with a coextruded skin comprised of a 80/20 blend of PET and LOTADER AX8900, an elastomer sold by Elf Atochem North America, Inc. This strap also showed good weldability as compared to the control strap. 
     Yet another strap (Example 4) was produced using a 70/30 blend (single screw blended) of PET and CRASTIN PBT (i.e. CRASTIN ST820) thermoplastic polyester resin, an impact modified resin sold by E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company. This strap also showed good weldability as compared to the control strap. 
     The skin is a PET or PET copolymer (or a blend thereof) containing between 1% to 90% (preferably 1% to 30%) of a high (compared to base PET) room temperature notch izod strength material as measured by ASTM D256 in its neat, unoriented form. The blended skin also preferably does not have a T g  more than 10 degrees C higher than the core material, and has an elongation of at least 30 percent. It is important for the skin material to inhibit as little as possible the orientation of the core material, so that the increased strength of the core which results from orientation can be maximized. 
     Although various preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described herein in detail, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that variations may be made thereto without departing from the spirit of the invention or the scope of the appended claims.