Patent Publication Number: US-2013236933-A1

Title: Methods for Producing a Fermentation Product from Lignocellulose-Containing Material

Description:
FIELD 
     Methods for producing a fermentation product from lignocellulose-containing material, are disclosed. 
     BACKGROUND 
     Lignocellulose-containing material, or biomass, may be used to produce fermentable sugars, which in turn may be used to produce fermentation products such as renewable fuels and chemicals. Lignocellulose-containing material is a complex structure of cellulose fibers wrapped in a lignin and hemicellulose sheath. Production of fermentation products from lignocellulose-containing material includes pre-treating, hydrolyzing, and fermenting the lignocellulose-containing material. 
     The structure of lignocellulose is not directly accessible to enzymatic hydrolysis. Therefore, the lignocellulose is pre-treated in order to break the lignin seal and disrupt the crystalline structure of cellulose. This may cause solubilization and saccharification of the hemicellulose fraction. The cellulose fraction is then hydrolyzed enzymatically, e.g., by cellulolytic enzymes, which degrades the carbohydrate polymers into fermentable sugars. These fermentable sugars are then converted into the desired fermentation product by a fermenting organism, which product may optionally be recovered, e.g., by distillation. 
     Producing a fermentation product from lignocellulose-containing material is currently very expensive. Consequently, there is a need for providing further processes for producing a fermentation product from lignocellulose-containing materials. 
     SUMMARY 
     The present invention relates to a method for producing a fermentation product from lignocellulose-containing material, comprising mixing of an acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and an alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material, hydrolysis (saccharification) and fermentation; to a method for degrading or converting lignocellulose-containing material into a hydrolyzate comprising mono- and oligo-saccharides, comprising mixing of an acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and an alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material, and hydrolysis; to a method for treating lignocellulose-containing material, comprising mixing of an acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. The present invention further relates to a fermentation product made according to the method for producing a fermentation product of the present invention. 
     In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method for producing a fermentation product from lignocellulose-containing material, comprising: 
     (a) pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent to obtain an acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent to obtain an alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; 
     (b) mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material with the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; 
     (c) hydrolyzing the mixed lignocellulose-containing material with an enzyme composition; and 
     (d) adding a fermenting organism to produce a fermentation product. 
     In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method for degrading or converting lignocellulose-containing material into a hydrolyzate comprising mono- and oligo-saccharides, comprising: 
     (a) pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent to obtain an acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent to obtain an alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; 
     (b) mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material with the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; and 
     (c) subjecting the mixed lignocellulose-containing material to at least partial hydrolysis to obtain a hydrolyzate comprising mono- and/or oligo-saccharides. 
     In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method for treating lignocellulose-containing material, comprising: 
     (a) pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent to obtain an acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent to obtain an alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; and 
     (b) mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material with the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. 
     In one aspect the present invention relates to a fermentation product made according to the method for producing a fermentation product of the present invention. 
     In conventional methods with acid pre-treatment, an alkaline agent, such as sodium hydroxide, is added to neutralize the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material before hydrolysis; and in conventional methods with alkaline pre-treatment, acid, such as sulfuric acid, is added to neutralize the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material before hydrolysis. But in the present invention, by mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material, there is no need to add additional chemicals to the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and/or alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material before hydrolysis. 
     By the method of the present invention, hydrolysis and/or fermentation are improved. The glucose conversion of mixed pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is comparable to acidic pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and much better than alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. Xylose conversion of mixed pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is the best among all tested pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. Final ethanol yield of mixed pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is also better than that of acidic pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. The glucose conversion of mixed pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is even better than that of NREL pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and that of lignocellulose-containing material pre-treated by acid at an optimal condition. Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that the content of the by-products produced by pre-treatment and neutralization, for example sulphate, in mixed pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is decreased, compared to that in acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material or alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. 
     By the method of the present invention, the cost of treating waste water can be saved. In the conventional methods, washing, such as by water, is used after acid pre-treatment or alkaline pre-treatment to adjust the pH or reduce the inhibitors for the hydrolysis and/or fermentation. As a lot of waste water is produced, there is a need to treat the waste water. But in a preferred method of the present invention by mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material, there is no need to wash the pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. 
     DEFINITION 
     Cellulolytic Enzyme or Cellulase 
     The term “cellulolytic enzyme” or “cellulase” means one or more (several) enzymes that hydrolyze a cellulosic material. Such enzymes include endoglucanase(s), cellobiohydrolase(s), beta-glucosidase(s), or combinations thereof. The two basic approaches for measuring cellulolytic activity include: (1) measuring the total cellulolytic activity, and (2) measuring the individual cellulolytic activities (endoglucanases, cellobiohydrolases, and beta-glucosidases) as reviewed in Zhang et al., Outlook for cellulase improvement: Screening and selection strategies, 2006 , Biotechnology Advances  24: 452-481. Total cellulolytic activity is usually measured using insoluble substrates, including Whatman No 1 filter paper, microcrystalline cellulose, bacterial cellulose, algal cellulose, cotton, pretreated lignocellulose, etc. The most common total cellulolytic activity assay is the filter paper assay using Whatman No 1 filter paper as the substrate. The assay was established by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) (Ghose, 1987, Measurement of cellulase activities,  Pure Appl. Chem.  59: 257-68). 
     For purposes of the present invention, cellulolytic enzyme activity is determined by measuring the increase in hydrolysis of a cellulosic material by cellulolytic enzyme(s) under the following conditions: 1-20 mg of cellulolytic enzyme protein/g of cellulose in pretreated corn stover (PCS) for 3-7 days at 50° C. compared to a control hydrolysis without addition of cellulolytic enzyme protein. Typical conditions are 1 ml reactions, washed or unwashed PCS, 5% insoluble solids, 50 mM sodium acetate pH 5, 1 mM MnSO 4 , 50° C., 72 hours, sugar analysis by AMINEX® HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, Calif., USA). 
     Endoglucanase 
     The term “endoglucanase” means an endo-1,4-(1,3;1,4)-beta-D-glucan 4-glucanohydrolase (E.C. 3.2.1.4), which catalyses endohydrolysis of 1,4-beta-D-glycosidic linkages in cellulose, cellulose derivatives (such as carboxymethyl cellulose and hydroxyethyl cellulose), lichenin, beta-1,4 bonds in mixed beta-1,3 glucans such as cereal beta-D-glucans or xyloglucans, and other plant material containing cellulosic components. Endoglucanase activity can be determined by measuring reduction in substrate viscosity or increase in reducing ends determined by a reducing sugar assay (Zhang et al., 2006 , Biotechnology Advances  24: 452-481). For purposes of the present invention, endoglucanase activity is determined using carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) as substrate according to the procedure of Ghose, 1987 , Pure and Appl. Chem.  59: 257-268, at pH 5, 40° C. 
     Cellobiohydrolase 
     The term “cellobiohydrolase” means a 1,4-beta-D-glucan cellobiohydrolase (E.C. 3.2.1.91 or E.C. 3.2.1.176), which catalyzes the hydrolysis of 1,4-beta-D-glucosidic linkages in cellulose, cellooligosaccharides, or any beta-1,4-linked glucose containing polymer, releasing cellobiose from the reducing or non-reducing ends of the chain (Teeri, 1997, Crystalline cellulose degradation: New insight into the function of cellobiohydrolases,  Trends in Biotechnology  15: 160-167; Teeri et al., 1998,  Trichoderma reesei  cellobiohydrolases: why so efficient on crystalline cellulose?,  Biochem. Soc. Trans.  26: 173-178). For purposes of the present invention, cellobiohydrolase activity is determined according to the procedures described by Lever et al., 1972 , Anal. Biochem.  47: 273-279; van Tilbeurgh et al., 1982 , FEBS Letters,  149: 152-156; van Tilbeurgh and Claeyssens, 1985 , FEBS Letters,  187: 283-288; and Tomme et al., 1988 , Eur. J. Biochem.  170: 575-581. In the present invention, the Lever et al. method can be employed to assess hydrolysis of cellulose in corn stover, while the methods of van Tilbeurgh et al. and Tomme et al. can be used to determine the cellobiohydrolase activity on a fluorescent disaccharide derivative, 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-lactoside. 
     Beta-Glucosidase 
     The term “beta-glucosidase” means a beta-D-glucoside glucohydrolase (E.C. 3.2.1.21), which catalyzes the hydrolysis of terminal non-reducing beta-D-glucose residues with the release of beta-D-glucose. For purposes of the present invention, beta-glucosidase activity is determined according to the basic procedure described by Venturi et al., 2002, Extracellular beta-D-glucosidase from  Chaetomium thermophilum  var.  coprophilum : production, purification and some biochemical properties,  J. Basic Microbiol.  42: 55-66. One unit of beta-glucosidase is defined as 1.0 μmole of p-nitrophenolate anion produced per minute at 25° C., pH 4.8 from 1 mM p-nitrophenyl-beta-D-glucopyranoside as substrate in 50 mM sodium citrate containing 0.01% TWEEN® 20. 
     Polypeptide Having Cellulolytic Enhancing Activity 
     The term “polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity” means a GH61 polypeptide that catalyzes the enhancement of the hydrolysis of a cellulosic material by enzyme having cellulolytic activity. For purposes of the present invention, cellulolytic enhancing activity is determined by measuring the increase in reducing sugars or the increase of the total of cellobiose and glucose from the hydrolysis of a cellulosic material by cellulolytic enzyme under the following conditions: 1-50 mg of total protein/g of cellulose in PCS, wherein total protein is comprised of 50-99.5% w/w cellulolytic enzyme protein and 0.5-50% w/w protein of a GH61 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity for 1-7 days at 50° C. compared to a control hydrolysis with equal total protein loading without cellulolytic enhancing activity (1-50 mg of cellulolytic protein/g of cellulose in PCS). In a preferred aspect, a mixture of CELLUCLAST® 1.5 L (Novozymes A/S, Bagsvæd, Denmark) in the presence of 2-3% of total protein weight  Aspergillus oryzae  beta-glucosidase (recombinantly produced in  Aspergillus oryzae  according to WO 02/095014) or 2-3% of total protein weight  Aspergillus fumigatus  beta-glucosidase (recombinantly produced in  Aspergillus oryzae  as described in WO 2002/095014) of cellulase protein loading is used as the source of the cellulolytic activity. 
     The GH61 polypeptides having cellulolytic enhancing activity enhance the hydrolysis of a cellulosic material catalyzed by enzyme having cellulolytic activity by reducing the amount of cellulolytic enzyme required to reach the same degree of hydrolysis preferably at least 1.01-fold, more preferably at least 1.05-fold, more preferably at least 1.10-fold, more preferably at least 1.25-fold, more preferably at least 1.5-fold, more preferably at least 2-fold, more preferably at least 3-fold, more preferably at least 4-fold, more preferably at least 5-fold, even more preferably at least 10-fold, and most preferably at least 20-fold. 
     Family 61 Glycoside Hydrolase 
     The term “Family 61 glycoside hydrolase” or “Family GH61” or “GH61” means a polypeptide falling into the glycoside hydrolase Family 61 according to Henrissat B., 1991, A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino-acid sequence similarities,  Biochem. J.  280: 309-316, and Henrissat B., and Bairoch A., 1996, Updating the sequence-based classification of glycosyl hydrolases,  Biochem. J.  316: 695-696. 
     Hemicellulolytic Enzyme or Hemicellulase 
     The term “hemicellulolytic enzyme” or “hemicellulase” means one or more (several) enzymes that hydrolyze a hemicellulosic material. See, for example, Shallom, D. and Shoham, Y. Microbial hemicellulases.  Current Opinion In Microbiology,  2003, 6(3): 219-228). Hemicellulases are key components in the degradation of plant biomass. Examples of hemicellulases include, but are not limited to, an acetylmannan esterase, an acetyxylan esterase, an arabinanase, an arabinofuranosidase, a coumaric acid esterase, a feruloyl esterase, a galactosidase, a glucuronidase, a glucuronoyl esterase, a mannanase, a mannosidase, a xylanase, and a xylosidase. The substrates of these enzymes, the hemicelluloses, are a heterogeneous group of branched and linear polysaccharides that are bound via hydrogen bonds to the cellulose microfibrils in the plant cell wall, crosslinking them into a robust network. Hemicelluloses are also covalently attached to lignin, forming together with cellulose a highly complex structure. The variable structure and organization of hemicelluloses require the concerted action of many enzymes for its complete degradation. The catalytic modules of hemicellulases are either glycoside hydrolases (GHs) that hydrolyze glycosidic bonds, or carbohydrate esterases (CEs), which hydrolyze ester linkages of acetate or ferulic acid side groups. These catalytic modules, based on homology of their primary sequence, can be assigned into GH and CE families marked by numbers. Some families, with overall similar fold, can be further grouped into clans, marked alphabetically (e.g., GH-A). A most informative and updated classification of these and other carbohydrate active enzymes is available on the Carbohydrate-Active Enzymes (CAZy) database. Hemicellulolytic enzyme activities can be measured according to Ghose and Bisaria, 1987 , Pure  &amp;  Appl. Chem.  59: 1739-1752. 
     Xylan Degrading Activity or Xylanolytic Activity 
     The term “xylan degrading activity” or “xylanolytic activity” means a biological activity that hydrolyzes xylan-containing material. The two basic approaches for measuring xylanolytic activity include: (1) measuring the total xylanolytic activity, and (2) measuring the individual xylanolytic activities (e.g., endoxylanases, beta-xylosidases, arabinofuranosidases, alpha-glucuronidases, acetylxylan esterases, feruloyl esterases, and alpha-glucuronyl esterases). Recent progress in assays of xylanolytic enzymes was summarized in several publications including Biely and Puchard, Recent progress in the assays of xylanolytic enzymes, 2006 , Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture  86(11): 1636-1647; Spanikova and Biely, 2006, Glucuronoyl esterase-Novel carbohydrate esterase produced by  Schizophyllum  commune,  FEBS Letters  580(19): 4597-4601; Herrmann, Vrsanska, Jurickova, Hirsch, Biely, and Kubicek, 1997, The beta-D-xylosidase of  Trichoderma reesei  is a multifunctional beta-D-xylan xylohydrolase,  Biochemical Journal  321: 375-381. 
     Total xylan degrading activity can be measured by determining the reducing sugars formed from various types of xylan, including, for example, oat spelt, beechwood, and larchwood xylans, or by photometric determination of dyed xylan fragments released from various covalently dyed xylans. The most common total xylanolytic activity assay is based on production of reducing sugars from polymeric 4-O-methyl glucuronoxylan as described in Bailey, Biely, Poutanen, 1992, Interlaboratory testing of methods for assay of xylanase activity,  Journal of Biotechnology  23(3): 257-270. Xylanase activity can also be determined with 0.2% AZCL-arabinoxylan as substrate in 0.01% Triton X-100 and 200 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6 at 37° C. One unit of xylanase activity is defined as 1.0 μmole of azurine produced per minute at 37° C., pH 6 from 0.2% AZCL-arabinoxylan as substrate in 200 mM sodium phosphate pH 6 buffer. 
     For purposes of the present invention, xylan degrading activity is determined by measuring the increase in hydrolysis of birchwood xylan (Sigma Chemical Co., Inc., St. Louis, Mo., USA) by xylan-degrading enzyme(s) under the following typical conditions: 1 ml reactions, 5 mg/ml substrate (total solids), 5 mg of xylanolytic protein/g of substrate, 50 mM sodium acetate pH 5, 50° C., 24 hours, sugar analysis using p-hydroxybenzoic acid hydrazide (PHBAH) assay as described by Lever, 1972, A new reaction for colorimetric determination of carbohydrates,  Anal. Biochem  47: 273-279. 
     Xylanase 
     The term “xylanase” means a 1,4-beta-D-xylan-xylohydrolase (E.C. 3.2.1.8) that catalyzes the endohydrolysis of 1,4-beta-D-xylosidic linkages in xylans. For purposes of the present invention, xylanase activity is determined with 0.2% AZCL-arabinoxylan as substrate in 0.01% Triton X-100 and 200 mM sodium phosphate buffer pH 6 at 37° C. One unit of xylanase activity is defined as 1.0 μmole of azurine produced per minute at 37° C., pH 6 from 0.2% AZCL-arabinoxylan as substrate in 200 mM sodium phosphate pH 6 buffer. 
     Beta-Xylosidase 
     The term “beta-xylosidase” means a beta-D-xyloside xylohydrolase (E.C. 3.2.1.37) that catalyzes the exo-hydrolysis of short beta (1→4)-xylooligosaccharides, to remove successive D-xylose residues from the non-reducing termini. For purposes of the present invention, one unit of beta-xylosidase is defined as 1.0 μmole of p-nitrophenolate anion produced per minute at 40° C., pH 5 from 1 mM p-nitrophenyl-beta-D-xyloside as substrate in 100 mM sodium citrate containing 0.01% TWEEN® 20. 
     Acetylxylan Esterase 
     The term “acetylxylan esterase” means a carboxylesterase (EC 3.1.1.72) that catalyses the hydrolysis of acetyl groups from polymeric xylan, acetylated xylose, acetylated glucose, alpha-napthyl acetate, and p-nitrophenyl acetate. For purposes of the present invention, acetylxylan esterase activity is determined using 0.5 mM p-nitrophenylacetate as substrate in 50 mM sodium acetate pH 5.0 containing 0.01% TWEEN™ 20. One unit of acetylxylan esterase is defined as the amount of enzyme capable of releasing 1 μmole of p-nitrophenolate anion per minute at pH 5, 25° C. 
     Feruloyl Esterase 
     The term “feruloyl esterase” means a 4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamoyl-sugar hydrolase (EC 3.1.1.73) that catalyzes the hydrolysis of the 4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamoyl (feruloyl) group from an esterified sugar, which is usually arabinose in “natural” substrates, to produce ferulate (4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamate). Feruloyl esterase is also known as ferulic acid esterase, hydroxycinnamoyl esterase, FAE-III, cinnamoyl ester hydrolase, FAEA, cinnAE, FAE-I, or FAE-II. For purposes of the present invention, feruloyl esterase activity is determined using 0.5 mM p-nitrophenylferulate as substrate in 50 mM sodium acetate pH 5.0. One unit of feruloyl esterase equals the amount of enzyme capable of releasing 1 μmole of p-nitrophenolate anion per minute at pH 5, 25° C. 
     Alpha-Glucuronidase 
     The term “alpha-glucuronidase” means an alpha-D-glucosiduronate glucuronohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.139) that catalyzes the hydrolysis of an alpha-D-glucuronoside to D-glucuronate and an alcohol. For purposes of the present invention, alpha-glucuronidase activity is determined according to de Vries, 1998 , J. Bacteriol.  180: 243-249. One unit of alpha-glucuronidase equals the amount of enzyme capable of releasing 1 μmole of glucuronic or 4-O-methylglucuronic acid per minute at pH 5, 40° C. 
     Alpha-L-Arabinofuranosidase 
     The term “alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase” means an alpha-L-arabinofuranoside arabinofuranohydrolase (EC 3.2.1.55) that catalyzes the hydrolysis of terminal non-reducing alpha-L-arabinofuranoside residues in alpha-L-arabinosides. The enzyme acts on alpha-L-arabinofuranosides, alpha-L-arabinans containing (1,3)- and/or (1,5)-linkages, arabinoxylans, and arabinogalactans. Alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase is also known as arabinosidase, alpha-arabinosidase, alpha-L-arabinosidase, alpha-arabinofuranosidase, polysaccharide alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase, alpha-L-arabinofuranoside hydrolase, L-arabinosidase, or alpha-L-arabinanase. For purposes of the present invention, alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase activity is determined using 5 mg of medium viscosity wheat arabinoxylan (Megazyme International Ireland, Ltd., Bray, Co. Wicklow, Ireland) per ml of 100 mM sodium acetate pH 5 in a total volume of 200 μl for 30 minutes at 40° C. followed by arabinose analysis by AMINEX® HPX-87H column chromatography (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, Calif., USA). 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     In one aspect the present invention relates to a method for producing a fermentation product from lignocellulose-containing material, comprising: 
     (a) pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent to obtain an acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent to obtain an alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; 
     (b) mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material with the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; 
     (c) hydrolyzing the mixed lignocellulose-containing material with an enzyme composition; and 
     (d) adding a fermenting organism to produce a fermentation product. 
     In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method for degrading or converting lignocellulose-containing material into a hydrolyzate comprising mono- and oligo-saccharides, comprising: 
     (a) pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent to obtain an acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent to obtain an alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; 
     (b) mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material with the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; and 
     (c) subjecting the mixed lignocellulose-containing material to at least partial hydrolysis to obtain a hydrolyzate comprising mono- and/or oligo-saccharides. 
     In one aspect, the present invention relates to a method for treating lignocellulose-containing material, comprising: 
     (a) pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent to obtain an acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent to obtain an alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; and 
     (b) mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material with the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. 
     In one aspect the present invention relates to a fermentation product made according to the method for producing a fermentation product of the present invention. 
     Lignocellulose-Containing Material 
     The term “lignocellulose” or “lignocellulose-containing material” or “lignocellulosic material” or “cellulosic material” means any material containing cellulose. The predominant polysaccharide in the primary cell wall of biomass is cellulose, the second most abundant is hemicellulose, and the third is pectin. The secondary cell wall, produced after the cell has stopped growing, also contains polysaccharides and is strengthened by polymeric lignin covalently cross-linked to hemicellulose. Cellulose is a homopolymer of anhydrocellobiose and thus a linear beta-(1-4)-D-glucan, while hemicelluloses include a variety of compounds, such as xylans, xyloglucans, arabinoxylans, and mannans in complex branched structures with a spectrum of substituents. Although generally polymorphous, cellulose is found in plant tissue primarily as an insoluble crystalline matrix of parallel glucan chains. Hemicelluloses usually hydrogen bond to cellulose, as well as to other hemicelluloses, which help stabilize the cell wall matrix. 
     Cellulose is generally found, for example, in the stems, leaves, hulls, husks, and cobs of plants or leaves, branches, and wood of trees. The cellulosic material can be, but is not limited to, agricultural residue, herbaceous material (including energy crops), municipal solid waste, pulp and paper mill residue, waste paper, and wood (including forestry residue) (see, for example, Wiselogel et al., 1995, in Handbook on Bioethanol (Charles E. Wyman, editor), pp. 105-118, Taylor &amp; Francis, Washington D.C.; Wyman, 1994, Bioresource Technology 50: 3-16; Lynd, 1990 , Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology  24/25: 695-719; Mosier et al., 1999, Recent Progress in Bioconversion of Lignocellulosics, in  Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology , T. Scheper, managing editor, Volume 65, pp. 23-40, Springer-Verlag, New York). It is understood herein that the cellulose may be in the form of lignocellulose, a plant cell wall material containing lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose in a mixed matrix. In a preferred aspect, the cellulosic material is any biomass material. In another preferred aspect, the cellulosic material is lignocellulose, which comprises cellulose, hemicelluloses, and lignin. 
     In one aspect, the cellulosic material is agricultural residue. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is herbaceous material (including energy crops). In another aspect, the cellulosic material is municipal solid waste. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is pulp and paper mill residue. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is waste paper. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is wood (including forestry residue). 
     In another aspect, the cellulosic material is arundo. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is bagasse. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is bamboo. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is corn cob. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is corn fiber. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is corn stover. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is miscanthus. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is orange peel. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is rice straw. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is switchgrass. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is wheat straw. 
     In another aspect, the cellulosic material is aspen. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is eucalyptus. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is fir. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is pine. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is poplar. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is spruce. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is willow. 
     In another aspect, the cellulosic material is algal cellulose. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is bacterial cellulose. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is cotton linter. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is filter paper. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is microcrystalline cellulose. In another aspect, the cellulosic material is phosphoric-acid treated cellulose. 
     In another aspect, the cellulosic material is an aquatic biomass. As used herein the term “aquatic biomass” means biomass produced in an aquatic environment by a photosynthesis process. The aquatic biomass can be algae, emergent plants, floating-leaf plants, or submerged plants. 
     The cellulosic material may be used as is or may be subjected to pretreatment, using conventional methods known in the art, as described herein. In a preferred aspect, the cellulosic material is pretreated. 
     In a preferred embodiment, the lignocellulose-containing material is selected from corn stover, corn cobs, corn fiber, switch grass, wheat straw, rice straw, bagasse, and algae, and the combination thereof. 
     Corn stover is one of the major lignocellulosic materials for advanced bioethanol production. In a preferred embodiment, corn stover is used as the biomass. 
     Different fractions of corn stover are comprised of a different arrangement of cell types. Their chemical and physical structures imply that the pre-treatment method required may vary considerably among different fractions. In a preferred embodiment, pre-treating a corn stover which stands more than 3 feet above ground with an acidic agent; and/or pre-treating a corn stover which stands 1-3 feet above ground with an alkaline agent. 
     Pre-Treatment 
     In combination with the method of the present invention, any pretreatment process known in the art can be used to disrupt plant cell wall components of the cellulosic material (Chandra et al., 2007, Substrate pretreatment: The key to effective enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics?,  Adv. Biochem. Engin./Biotechnol.  108: 67-93; Galbe and Zacchi, 2007, Pretreatment of lignocellulosic materials for efficient bioethanol production,  Adv. Biochem. Engin./Biotechnol.  108: 41-65; Hendriks and Zeeman, 2009, Pretreatments to enhance the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass,  Bioresource Technol.  100: 10-18; Mosier et al., 2005, Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass,  Bioresource Technol.  96: 673-686; Taherzadeh and Karimi, 2008, Pretreatment of lignocellulosic wastes to improve ethanol and biogas production: A review,  Int. J. of Mol. Sci.  9: 1621-1651; Yang and Wyman, 2008, Pretreatment: the key to unlocking low-cost cellulosic ethanol,  Biofuels Bioproducts and Biorefining - Biofpr.  2: 26-40). 
     The cellulosic material can also be subjected to particle size reduction, sieving, pre-soaking, wetting, washing, and/or conditioning prior to pretreatment using methods known in the art. 
     Conventional pretreatments include, but are not limited to, steam pretreatment (with or without explosion), dilute acid pretreatment, hot water pretreatment, alkaline pretreatment, lime pretreatment, wet oxidation, wet explosion, ammonia fiber explosion, organosolv pretreatment, and biological pretreatment. Additional pretreatments include ammonia percolation, ultrasound, electroporation, microwave, supercritical CO 2 , supercritical H 2 O, ozone, ionic liquid, and gamma irradiation pretreatments. 
     The cellulosic material can be pretreated before hydrolysis and/or fermentation. Pretreatment is preferably performed prior to the hydrolysis. Alternatively, the pretreatment can be carried out simultaneously with enzyme hydrolysis to release fermentable sugars, such as glucose, xylose, and/or cellobiose. In most cases the pretreatment step itself results in some conversion of biomass to fermentable sugars (even in absence of enzymes). 
     Steam Pretreatment. In steam pretreatment, the cellulosic material is heated to disrupt the plant cell wall components, including lignin, hemicellulose, and cellulose to make the cellulose and other fractions, e.g., hemicellulose, accessible to enzymes. The cellulosic material is passed to or through a reaction vessel where steam is injected to increase the temperature to the required temperature and pressure and is retained therein for the desired reaction time. Steam pretreatment is preferably performed at 140-250° C., e.g., 160-200° C. or 170-190° C., where the optimal temperature range depends on addition of a chemical catalyst. Residence time for the steam pretreatment is preferably 1-60 minutes, e.g., 1-30 minutes, 1-20 minutes, 3-12 minutes, or 4-10 minutes, where the optimal residence time depends on temperature range and addition of a chemical catalyst. Steam pretreatment allows for relatively high solids loadings, so that the cellulosic material is generally only moist during the pretreatment. The steam pretreatment is often combined with an explosive discharge of the material after the pretreatment, which is known as steam explosion, that is, rapid flashing to atmospheric pressure and turbulent flow of the material to increase the accessible surface area by fragmentation (Duff and Murray, 1996 , Bioresource Technology  855: 1-33; Galbe and Zacchi, 2002 , Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.  59: 618-628; U.S. Patent Application No. 20020164730). During steam pretreatment, hemicellulose acetyl groups are cleaved and the resulting acid autocatalyzes partial hydrolysis of the hemicellulose to monosaccharides and oligosaccharides. Lignin is removed to only a limited extent. 
     Chemical Pretreatment: The term “chemical treatment” refers to any chemical pretreatment that promotes the separation and/or release of cellulose, hemicellulose, and/or lignin. Such a pretreatment can convert crystalline cellulose to amorphous cellulose. Examples of suitable chemical pretreatment processes include, for example, dilute acid pretreatment, lime pretreatment, wet oxidation, ammonia fiber/freeze explosion (AFEX), ammonia percolation (APR), ionic liquid, and organosolv pretreatments. 
     A catalyst such as H 2 SO 4  or SO 2  (typically 0.3 to 5% w/w) is often added prior to steam pretreatment, which decreases the time and temperature, increases the recovery, and improves enzymatic hydrolysis (Ballesteros et al., 2006 , Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.  129-132: 496-508; Varga et al., 2004 , Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.  113-116: 509-523; Sassner et al., 2006 , Enzyme Microb. Technol.  39: 756-762). In dilute acid pretreatment, the cellulosic material is mixed with dilute acid, typically H 2 SO 4 , and water to form a slurry, heated by steam to the desired temperature, and after a residence time flashed to atmospheric pressure. The dilute acid pretreatment can be performed with a number of reactor designs, e.g., plug-flow reactors, counter-current reactors, or continuous counter-current shrinking bed reactors (Duff and Murray, 1996, supra; Schell et al., 2004 , Bioresource Technol.  91: 179-188; Lee et al., 1999 , Adv. Biochem. Eng. Biotechnol.  65: 93-115). 
     Several methods of pretreatment under alkaline conditions can also be used. These alkaline pretreatments include, but are not limited to, sodium hydroxide, lime, wet oxidation, ammonia percolation (APR), and ammonia fiber/freeze explosion (AFEX). 
     Lime pretreatment is performed with calcium oxide or calcium hydroxide at temperatures of 85-150° C. and residence times from 1 hour to several days (Wyman et al., 2005 , Bioresource Technol.  96: 1959-1966; Mosier et al., 2005 , Bioresource Technol.  96: 673-686). WO 2006/110891, WO 2006/110899, WO 2006/110900, and WO 2006/110901 disclose pretreatment methods using ammonia. 
     Wet oxidation is a thermal pretreatment performed typically at 180-200° C. for 5-15 minutes with addition of an oxidative agent such as hydrogen peroxide or over-pressure of oxygen (Schmidt and Thomsen, 1998 , Bioresource Technol.  64: 139-151; Palonen et al., 2004 , Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.  117: 1-17; Varga et al., 2004 , Biotechnol. Bioeng.  88: 567-574; Martin et al., 2006 , J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol.  81: 1669-1677). The pretreatment is performed preferably at 1-40% dry matter, e.g., 2-30% dry matter or 5-20% dry matter, and often the initial pH is increased by the addition of alkali such as sodium carbonate. 
     A modification of the wet oxidation pretreatment method, known as wet explosion (combination of wet oxidation and steam explosion) can handle dry matter up to 30%. In wet explosion, the oxidizing agent is introduced during pretreatment after a certain residence time. The pretreatment is then ended by flashing to atmospheric pressure (WO 2006/032282). 
     Ammonia fiber explosion (AFEX) involves treating the cellulosic material with liquid or gaseous ammonia at moderate temperatures such as 90-150° C. and high pressure such as 17-20 bar for 5-10 minutes, where the dry matter content can be as high as 60% (Gollapalli et al., 2002,  Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.  98: 23-35; Chundawat et al., 2007 , Biotechnol. Bioeng.  96: 219-231; Alizadeh et al., 2005 , Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.  121: 1133-1141; Teymouri et al., 2005 , Bioresource Technol.  96: 2014-2018). During AFEX pretreatment cellulose and hemicelluloses remain relatively intact. Lignin-carbohydrate complexes are cleaved. 
     Mechanical Pretreatment or Physical Pretreatment: The term “mechanical pretreatment” or “physical pretreatment” refers to any pretreatment that promotes size reduction of particles. For example, such pretreatment can involve various types of grinding or milling (e.g., dry milling, wet milling, or vibratory ball milling). 
     The cellulosic material can be pretreated both physically (mechanically) and chemically. Mechanical or physical pretreatment can be coupled with steaming/steam explosion, hydrothermolysis, dilute or mild acid treatment, high temperature, high pressure treatment, irradiation (e.g., microwave irradiation), or combinations thereof. In one aspect, high pressure means pressure in the range of preferably about 100 to about 400 psi, e.g., about 150 to about 250 psi. In another aspect, high temperature means temperatures in the range of about 100 to about 300° C., e.g., about 140 to about 200° C. In a preferred aspect, mechanical or physical pretreatment is performed in a batch-process using a steam gun hydrolyzer system that uses high pressure and high temperature as defined above, e.g., a Sunds Hydrolyzer available from Sunds Defibrator AB, Sweden. The physical and chemical pretreatments can be carried out sequentially or simultaneously, as desired. 
     Accordingly, in a preferred aspect, the cellulosic material is subjected to physical (mechanical) or chemical pretreatment, or any combination thereof, to promote the separation and/or release of cellulose, hemicellulose, and/or lignin. 
     Biological Pretreatment: The term “biological pretreatment” refers to any biological pretreatment that promotes the separation and/or release of cellulose, hemicellulose, and/or lignin from the cellulosic material. Biological pretreatment techniques can involve applying lignin-solubilizing microorganisms and/or enzymes (see, for example, Hsu, T.-A., 1996, Pretreatment of biomass, in  Handbook on Bioethanol: Production and Utilization , Wyman, C. E., ed., Taylor &amp; Francis, Washington, D.C., 179-212; Ghosh and Singh, 1993, Physicochemical and biological treatments for enzymatic/microbial conversion of cellulosic biomass,  Adv. Appl. Microbiol.  39: 295-333; McMillan, J. D., 1994, Pretreating lignocellulosic biomass: a review, in  Enzymatic Conversion of Biomass for Fuels Production , Himmel, M. E., Baker, J. O., and Overend, R. P., eds., ACS Symposium Series 566, American Chemical Society, Washington, D.C., chapter 15; Gong, C. S., Cao, N.J., Du, J., and Tsao, G. T., 1999, Ethanol production from renewable resources, in  Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology , Scheper, T., ed., Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 65: 207-241; Olsson and Hahn-Hagerdal, 1996, Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates for ethanol production,  Enz. Microb. Tech.  18: 312-331; and Vallander and Eriksson, 1990, Production of ethanol from lignocellulosic materials: State of the art,  Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol.  42: 63-95). 
     In accordance with the present invention, the lignocellulose-containing material is pre-treated by pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent to obtain an acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent to obtain an alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. 
     The pre-treating of the lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent used in the present invention can be any acid pre-treatment known in the art. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent comprises soaking the lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent comprises soaking the lignocellulose-containing material with the acidic agent and steam-exploding the lignocellulose-containing material. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the acid pre-treatment is carried out using hydrochloric acid, phosphoric acid, sulphuric acid, sulphurous acid, carbonic acid, formic acid, acetic acid, citric acid, tartaric acid, glucuronic acid, galacturonic acid, succinic acid, and/or chemicals that can be converted into acids, such as hydrogen chloride, phosphoric anhydride, sulfur dioxide, carbon dioxide; or mixtures thereof. In a more preferred embodiment of the present invention, the acid is sulphuric acid. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the concentration of the acidic agent in aqueous solution is 0.05-10% (w/w), preferably 0.1-5% (w/w), more preferably 0.3-2.5% (w/w). 
     The acid may be contacted with the biomass and the mixture for periods ranging from minutes to seconds. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the acid pre-treatment is carried out for a period of between 1 minute and 300 minutes, preferably between 30 minutes and 250 minutes, more preferably between 60 minutes and 150 minutes. 
     The acid may be contacted with the biomass and the mixture at a temperature known in the art. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the acid pre-treatment is carried out at a temperature of between 130° C. and 270° C.; preferably between 150° C. and 230° C., more preferably between 160° C. and 200° C. 
     Preferably the acid pre-treatment is a continuous dilute or mild acid treatment with organic and/or inorganic acid. Mild acid treatment means that the treatment pH lies in the range from about pH 1-5, preferably about pH 1-3. Nevertheless, even this mild acid pre-treatment is still at a relatively low pH value which is not attractive to hydrolysis and/or fermentation. The activity of common cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes and/or common fermenting organisms is low at this pH range. Therefore, raising the pH is essential in order to achieve an efficient enzymatic hydrolysis and/or fermentation. One approach to raise the pH is by washing the acid pre-treated biomass prior to enzymatic hydrolysis and/or fermentation. However, this leads to the use of high amounts of water. As a costly additional process step, washing is not economical and sustainable on an industrial scale. Another way to raise the pH of the pre-treated material is by neutralizing the acid with alkaline, such as sodium hydroxide (NaOH). Yet this results in the formation of low value salts as by-products. The problem of the low pH value of the lignocellulosic material after pre-treatment with an acidic agent is properly solved by the method of the present invention. 
     The pre-treating of the lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent used in the present invention can be any alkaline pre-treatment known in the art. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent comprises soaking the lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the alkaline agent is selected from the group consisting of calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH) 2 ), calcium oxide (CaO), ammonia (NH 3 ), sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sodium carbonate (NaCO 3 ), potassium hydroxide (KOH), urea, and/or combinations thereof. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the concentration of the alkaline agent in aqueous solution is 0.1-50% (w/w), preferably 0.5-40% (w/w), more preferably 5-25% (w/w), especially sulphuric acid. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, for the pre-treatment with an alkaline agent, the total solid of the lignocellulose-containing material is 1-80% (w/w), preferably 5-50% (w/w), more preferably 8-30% (w/w). 
     The alkaline agent may be contacted with the biomass and the mixture for periods ranging from minutes to seconds. In a preferred embodiment, pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent is carried out for a period between 1 minute and 300 minutes, preferably between 30 minutes and 250 minutes, and more preferably between 60 minutes and 150 minutes. 
     Preferably the alkaline pre-treatment is an alkaline pre-treatment at mild temperature, for example, in the range from about 50° C. and 120° C., preferably between about 70° C. and about 100° C. 
     Preferably the pH of the alkaline-pre-treatment lies in the range from about pH 8.0-14.0, preferably about pH 10.0-12.0. Nevertheless, the alkaline pre-treatment at relatively high pH value is not attractive to hydrolysis and/or fermentation. The activity of common cellulolytic and hemicellulolytic enzymes and/or common fermenting organisms is low at this pH range. Therefore, lowering the pH is essential in order to achieve an efficient enzymatic hydrolysis and/or fermentation. One approach to lower the pH is by washing the pre-treated biomass prior to enzymatic hydrolysis. However, this leads to the use of high amounts of water. As a costly additional process step, washing is not economical and sustainable on an industrial scale. Another way to lower the pH of the pre-treated material is by neutralizing the alkaline agent with acids, such as sulphuric acid and acetic acid, or with CO 2 . Yet this results in the formation of low value salts as by-products. The problem of the high pH value of the lignocellulosic material after pre-treatment with an alkaline agent is properly solved by the method of the present invention. 
     Alternatively or in combination with preferred embodiments of the present invention, in further preferred embodiments, the acid pre-treatment and/or alkaline pre-treatment is preceded by, followed by, combined with and/or integrated with other chemical pre-treatment, mechanical pre-treatment and/or biological pre-treatment. 
     In a preferred embodiment, the biomass is pre-treated both chemically and mechanically. The chemical and mechanical pre-treatments may be carried out sequentially or simultaneously, as desired. In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent comprises soaking the lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent and steam-exploding the lignocellulose-containing material. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, pre-treating lignocellulose-containing material with an alkaline agent comprises soaking the lignocellulose-containing material with an acidic agent at a temperature in the range from about 50° C. to about 150° C., preferably between about 70° C. and about 120° C. 
     According to the present invention, the cellulosic material may be pre-treated before or during hydrolysis. Preferably the pre-treatment is carried out prior to the hydrolysis. In such circumstances, pre-treatment is sometimes called pre-hydrolysis. Alternatively, pre-treatment may be carried out simultaneously with hydrolysis, such as simultaneously with addition of one or more cellulolytic enzymes, or other enzyme activities, to release, e.g., fermentable sugars, such as glucose or maltose. 
     Mixing 
     In a method of the present invention, after acid pre-treatment and alkaline pre-treatment, the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is mixed with the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. In a preferred embodiment, the mixed lignocellulose-containing material is adjusted to pH 3-8, preferably pH 4-6, especially around pH 5. 
     It is unexpected that by mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material with the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material, the hydrolysis and/or fermentation are improved compared to the hydrolysis and/or fermentation for acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material or alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. The glucose conversion of mixed pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is comparable to acidic pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and much better than alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. Xylose conversion of mixed pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is the best among all tested pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. Final ethanol yield of mixed pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is also better than that of acidic pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. The glucose conversion of mixed pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is even better than that of NREL pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material and that of the lignocellulose-containing material pre-treated with acid at the optimal conditions. Without being bound by any particular theory, it is believed that the content of the by-products produced by pre-treatment and neutralization, for example sulphate, in mixed pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material is decreased, compared to acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material or alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material, so that hydrolysis and/or fermentation are improved. 
     By mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material with the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material, there is no need to add large amount of chemicals, including alkaline, and acid for pH neutralization before hydrolysis, and therefore the chemicals can be saved. In the conventional methods with acid pre-treatment, alkaline such as sodium hydroxide, is added to neutralize the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material; and in the conventional methods with alkaline pre-treatment, acid such as sulfuric acid is added to neutralize the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material. 
     In one embodiment of the present invention, the pre-treated biomass may be washed. However, washing is not obligatory required. In a preferred embodiment, the pre-treated biomass is not washed. By mixing the acid pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material with the alkaline pre-treated lignocellulose-containing material, there is no need to treat waste water and therefore the cost of treating waste water is saved. In the conventional methods, washing, such as by water, is used after acid pre-treatment or alkaline pre-treatment to adjust the pH and/or reduce inhibitors for the hydrolysis and/or fermentation. Washing is not economical and sustainable on an industrial scale. 
     Hydrolysis (Saccharification) 
     In the hydrolysis step, also known as saccharification, the cellulosic material, e.g., pretreated, is hydrolyzed to break down cellulose and/or hemicellulose to fermentable sugars, such as glucose, cellobiose, xylose, xylulose, arabinose, mannose, galactose, and/or soluble oligosaccharides. The hydrolysis is performed enzymatically by an enzyme composition in the presence of a polypeptide having cellobiohydrolase activity of the present invention. The enzymes of the compositions can be added simultaneously or sequentially. 
     Enzymatic hydrolysis is preferably carried out in a suitable aqueous environment under conditions that can be readily determined by one skilled in the art. In one aspect, hydrolysis is performed under conditions suitable for the activity of the enzymes, i.e., optimal for the enzymes. The hydrolysis can be carried out as a fed batch or continuous process where the cellulosic material is fed gradually to, for example, an enzyme containing hydrolysis solution. 
     The saccharification is generally performed in stirred-tank reactors or fermentors under controlled pH, temperature, and mixing conditions. Suitable process time, temperature and pH conditions can readily be determined by one skilled in the art. For example, the saccharification can last up to 200 hours, but is typically performed for preferably about 12 to about 120 hours, e.g., about 16 to about 72 hours or about 24 to about 48 hours. The temperature is in the range of preferably about 25° C. to about 70° C., e.g., about 30° C. to about 65° C., about 40° C. to about 60° C., or about 50° C. to about 55° C. The pH is in the range of preferably about 3 to about 8, e.g., about 3.5 to about 7, about 4 to about 6, or about 5.0 to about 5.5. The dry solids content is in the range of preferably about 5 to about 50 wt %, e.g., about 10 to about 40 wt % or about 20 to about 30 wt %. 
     The enzyme compositions can comprise any protein useful in degrading or converting the cellulosic material. 
     In one aspect, the enzyme composition comprises or further comprises one or more (e.g., several) proteins/polypeptides selected from the group consisting of a cellulase, a GH61 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity, a hemicellulase, an esterase, an expansin, a laccase, a ligninolytic enzyme, a pectinase, a peroxidase, a protease, and a swollenin. In another aspect, the cellulase is preferably one or more (e.g., several) enzymes selected from the group consisting of an endoglucanase, a cellobiohydrolase, and a beta-glucosidase. In another aspect, the hemicellulase is preferably one or more (e.g., several) enzymes selected from the group consisting of an acetylmannan esterase, an acetylxylan esterase, an arabinanase, an arabinofuranosidase, a coumaric acid esterase, a feruloyl esterase, a galactosidase, a glucuronidase, a glucuronoyl esterase, a mannanase, a mannosidase, a xylanase, and a xylosidase. 
     In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises one or more (e.g., several) cellulolytic enzymes. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises or further comprises one or more (e.g., several) hemicellulolytic enzymes. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises one or more (e.g., several) cellulolytic enzymes and one or more (e.g., several) hemicellulolytic enzymes. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises one or more (e.g., several) enzymes selected from the group of cellulolytic enzymes and hemicellulolytic enzymes. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an endoglucanase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a cellobiohydrolase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a beta-glucosidase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an endoglucanase and a polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a cellobiohydrolase and a polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a beta-glucosidase and a polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an endoglucanase and a cellobiohydrolase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an endoglucanase and a beta-glucosidase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a cellobiohydrolase and a beta-glucosidase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an endoglucanase, a cellobiohydrolase, and a polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an endoglucanase, a beta-glucosidase, and a polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a cellobiohydrolase, a beta-glucosidase, and a polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an endoglucanase, a cellobiohydrolase, and a beta-glucosidase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an endoglucanase, a cellobiohydrolase, a beta-glucosidase, and a polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity. 
     In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an acetylmannan esterase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an acetylxylan esterase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an arabinanase (e.g., alpha-L-arabinanase). In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an arabinofuranosidase (e.g., alpha-L-arabinofuranosidase). In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a coumaric acid esterase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a feruloyl esterase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a galactosidase (e.g., alpha-galactosidase and/or beta-galactosidase). In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a glucuronidase (e.g., alpha-D-glucuronidase). In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a glucuronoyl esterase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a mannanase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a mannosidase (e.g., beta-mannosidase). In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a xylanase. In a preferred aspect, the xylanase is a Family 10 xylanase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a xylosidase (e.g., beta-xylosidase). 
     In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an esterase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises an expansin. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a laccase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a ligninolytic enzyme. In a preferred aspect, the ligninolytic enzyme is a manganese peroxidase. In another preferred aspect, the ligninolytic enzyme is a lignin peroxidase. In another preferred aspect, the ligninolytic enzyme is a H 2 O 2 -producing enzyme. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a pectinase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a peroxidase. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a protease. In another aspect, the enzyme composition comprises a swollenin. 
     In the processes of the present invention, the enzyme(s) can be added prior to or during saccharification, saccharification and fermentation, or fermentation. 
     One or more (e.g., several) components of the enzyme composition may be wild-type proteins, recombinant proteins, or a combination of wild-type proteins and recombinant proteins. For example, one or more (e.g., several) components may be native proteins of a cell, which is used as a host cell to express recombinantly one or more (e.g., several) other components of the enzyme composition. One or more (e.g., several) components of the enzyme composition may be produced as monocomponents, which are then combined to form the enzyme composition. The enzyme composition may be a combination of multicomponent and monocomponent protein preparations. 
     The enzymes used in the processes of the present invention may be in any form suitable for use, such as, for example, a fermentation broth formulation or a cell composition, a cell lysate with or without cellular debris, a semi-purified or purified enzyme preparation, or a host cell as a source of the enzymes. The enzyme composition may be a dry powder or granulate, a non-dusting granulate, a liquid, a stabilized liquid, or a stabilized protected enzyme. Liquid enzyme preparations may, for instance, be stabilized by adding stabilizers such as a sugar, a sugar alcohol or another polyol, and/or lactic acid or another organic acid according to established processes. 
     The optimum amounts of the enzymes and a polypeptide having cellobiohydrolase activity depend on several factors including, but not limited to, the mixture of component cellulolytic enzymes and/or hemicellulolytic enzymes, the cellulosic material, the concentration of cellulosic material, the pretreatment(s) of the cellulosic material, temperature, time, pH, and inclusion of fermenting organism (e.g., yeast for Simultaneous Saccharification and Fermentation). 
     In one aspect, an effective amount of cellulolytic or hemicellulolytic enzyme to the cellulosic material is about 0.1 to about 50 mg, e.g., about 0.1 to about 40 mg, about 0.5 to about 25 mg, about 0.75 to about 20 mg, about 0.75 to about 15 mg, about 0.5 to about 10 mg, or about 2.5 to about 10 mg per g of the cellulosic material. 
     In another aspect, an effective amount of a polypeptide having cellobiohydrolase activity to the cellulosic material is about 0.01 to about 50.0 mg, e.g., about 0.01 to about 40 mg, about 0.01 to about 30 mg, about 0.01 to about 20 mg, about 0.01 to about 10 mg, about 0.01 to about 5 mg, about 0.025 to about 1.5 mg, about 0.05 to about 1.25 mg, about 0.075 to about 1.25 mg, about 0.1 to about 1.25 mg, about 0.15 to about 1.25 mg, or about 0.25 to about 1.0 mg per g of the cellulosic material. 
     In another aspect, an effective amount of a polypeptide having cellobiohydrolase activity to cellulolytic or hemicellulolytic enzyme is about 0.005 to about 1.0 g, e.g., about 0.01 to about 1.0 g, about 0.15 to about 0.75 g, about 0.15 to about 0.5 g, about 0.1 to about 0.5 g, about 0.1 to about 0.25 g, or about 0.05 to about 0.2 g per g of cellulolytic or hemicellulolytic enzyme. 
     The polypeptides having cellulolytic enzyme activity or hemicellulolytic enzyme activity as well as other proteins/polypeptides useful in the degradation of the cellulosic material, e.g., GH61 polypeptides having cellulolytic enhancing activity (collectively hereinafter “polypeptides having enzyme activity”) can be derived or obtained from any suitable origin, including, bacterial, fungal, yeast, plant, or mammalian origin. The term “obtained” also means herein that the enzyme may have been produced recombinantly in a host organism employing methods described herein, wherein the recombinantly produced enzyme is either native or foreign to the host organism or has a modified amino acid sequence, e.g., having one or more (e.g., several) amino acids that are deleted, inserted and/or substituted, i.e., a recombinantly produced enzyme that is a mutant and/or a fragment of a native amino acid sequence or an enzyme produced by nucleic acid shuffling processes known in the art. Encompassed within the meaning of a native enzyme are natural variants and within the meaning of a foreign enzyme are variants obtained recombinantly, such as by site-directed mutagenesis or shuffling. 
     A polypeptide having enzyme activity may be a bacterial polypeptide. For example, the polypeptide may be a Gram-positive bacterial polypeptide such as a  Bacillus, Streptococcus, Streptomyces, Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Clostridium, Geobacillus, Caldicellulosiruptor, Acidothermus, Thermobifidia , or  Oceanobacillus polypeptide  having enzyme activity, or a Gram negative bacterial polypeptide such as an  E. coli, Pseudomonas, Salmonella, Campylobacter, Helicobacter, Flavobacterium, Fusobacterium, Ilyobacter, Neisseria , or  Ureaplasma  polypeptide having enzyme activity. 
     In one aspect, the polypeptide is a  Bacillus alkalophilus, Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, Bacillus brevis, Bacillus circulans, Bacillus clausii, Bacillus coagulans, Bacillus firmus, Bacillus lautus, Bacillus lentus, Bacillus licheniformnis, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus stearothermophilus, Bacillus subtilis , or  Bacillus thuringiensis  polypeptide having enzyme activity. 
     In another aspect, the polypeptide is a  Streptococcus equisimilis, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus uberis , or  Streptococcus equi  subsp.  Zooepidemicus  polypeptide having enzyme activity. 
     In another aspect, the polypeptide is a  Streptomyces achromogenes, Streptomyces avermitilis, Streptomyces coelicolor, Streptomyces griseus , or  Streptomyces lividans  polypeptide having enzyme activity. 
     The polypeptide having enzyme activity may also be a fungal polypeptide, and more preferably a yeast polypeptide such as a  Candida, Kluyveromyces, Pichia, Saccharomyces, Schizosaccharomyces , or  Yarrowia  polypeptide having enzyme activity; or more preferably a filamentous fungal polypeptide such as an  Acremonium, Agaricus, Alternaria, Aspergillus, Aureobasidium, Botryospaeria, Ceriporiopsis, Chaetomidium, Chrysosporium, Claviceps, Cochliobolus, Coprinopsis, Coptotermes, Corynascus, Cryphonectria, Cryptococcus, Diplodia, Exidia, Filibasidium, Fusarium, Gibberella, Holomastigotoides, Humicola, Irpex, Lentinula, Leptospaeria, Magnaporthe, Melanocarpus, Meripilus, Mucor, Myceliophthora, Neocallimastix, Neurospora, Paecilomyces, Penicillium, Phanerochaete, Piromyces, Poitrasia, Pseudoplectania, Pseudotrichonympha, Rhizomucor, Schizophyllum, Scytalidium, Talaromyces, Thermoascus, Thielavia, Tolypocladium, Trichoderma, Trichophaea, Verticillium, Volvariella , or  Xylaria  polypeptide having enzyme activity. 
     In one aspect, the polypeptide is a  Saccharomyces carlsbergensis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Saccharomyces diastaticus, Saccharomyces douglasii, Saccharomyces kluyveri, Saccharomyces norbensis , or  Saccharomyces oviformis  polypeptide having enzyme activity. 
     In another aspect, the polypeptide is an  Acremonium cellulolyticus, Aspergillus aculeatus, Aspergillus awamori, Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus foetidus, Aspergillus japonicus, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus oryzae, Chrysosporium keratinophilum, Chrysosporium lucknowense, Chrysosporium tropicum, Chrysosporium merdarium, Chrysosporium inops, Chrysosporium pannicola, Chrysosporium queenslandicum, Chrysosporium zonatum, Fusarium bactridioides, Fusarium cerealis, Fusarium crookwellense, Fusarium culmorum, Fusarium graminearum, Fusarium graminum, Fusarium heterosporum, Fusarium negundi, Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium reticulatum, Fusarium roseum, Fusarium sambucinum, Fusarium sarcochroum, Fusarium sporotrichioides, Fusarium sulphureum, Fusarium torulosum, Fusarium trichothecioides, Fusarium venenatum, Humicola grisea, Humicola insolens, Humicola lanuginosa, Irpex lacteus, Mucor miehei, Myceliophthora thermophila, Neurospora crassa, Penicillium funiculosum, Penicillium purpurogenum, Phanerochaete chrysosporium, Thielavia achromatica, Thielavia albomyces, Thielavia albopilosa, Thielavia australeinsis, Thielavia fimeti, Thielavia microspora, Thielavia ovispora, Thielavia peruviana, Thielavia spededonium, Thielavia setosa, Thielavia subthermophila, Thielavia terrestris, Trichoderma harzianum, Trichoderma koningii, Trichoderma longibrachiatum, Trichoderma reesei, Trichoderma viride , or  Trichophaea saccata  polypeptide having enzyme activity. 
     Chemically modified or protein engineered mutants of polypeptides having enzyme activity may also be used. 
     One or more (e.g., several) components of the enzyme composition may be a recombinant component, i.e., produced by cloning of a DNA sequence encoding the single component and subsequent cell transformed with the DNA sequence and expressed in a host (see, for example, WO 91/17243 and WO 91/17244). The host is preferably a heterologous host (enzyme is foreign to host), but the host may under certain conditions also be a homologous host (enzyme is native to host). Monocomponent cellulolytic proteins may also be prepared by purifying such a protein from a fermentation broth. 
     In one aspect, the one or more (e.g., several) cellulolytic enzymes comprise a commercial cellulolytic enzyme preparation. Examples of commercial cellulolytic enzyme preparations suitable for use in the present invention include, for example, CELLIC® CTec (Novozymes A/S), CELLIC® CTec2 (Novozymes A/S), CELLUCLAST™ (Novozymes A/S), NOVOZYM™ 188 (Novozymes A/S), CELLUZYME™ (Novozymes A/S), CEREFLO™ (Novozymes A/S), and ULTRAFLO™ (Novozymes A/S), ACCELERASE™ (Genencor Int.), LAMINEX™ (Genencor Int.), SPEZYME™ CP (Genencor Int.), FILTRASE® NL (DSM); METHAPLUS® S/L 100 (DSM), ROHAMENT™ 7069 W (Rohm GmbH), FIBREZYME® LDI (Dyadic International, Inc.), FIBREZYME® LBR (Dyadic International, Inc.), or VISCOSTAR® 150 L (Dyadic International, Inc.). The cellulase enzymes are added in amounts effective from about 0.001 to about 5.0 wt % of solids, e.g., about 0.025 to about 4.0 wt % of solids or about 0.005 to about 2.0 wt % of solids. 
     Examples of bacterial endoglucanases that can be used in the processes of the present invention, include, but are not limited to, an  Acidothermus cellulolyticus  endoglucanase (WO 91/05039; WO 93/15186; U.S. Pat. No. 5,275,944; WO 96/02551; U.S. Pat. No. 5,536,655, WO 00/70031, WO 05/093050);  Thermobifida fusca  endoglucanase III (WO 05/093050); and  Thermobifida fusca  endoglucanase V (WO 05/093050). 
     Examples of fungal endoglucanases that can be used in the present invention, include, but are not limited to, a  Trichoderma reesei  endoglucanase I (Penttila et al., 1986 , Gene  45: 253-263,  Trichoderma reesei  Cel7B endoglucanase I (GENBANK™ accession no. M15665),  Trichoderma reesei  endoglucanase II (Saloheimo, et al., 1988, Gene 63:11-22),  Trichoderma reesei  Cel5A endoglucanase II (GENBANK™ accession no. M19373),  Trichoderma reesei  endoglucanase III (Okada et al., 1988 , Appl. Environ. Microbiol.  64: 555-563, GENBANK™ accession no. AB003694),  Trichoderma reesei  endoglucanase V (Saloheimo et al., 1994,  Molecular Microbiology  13: 219-228, GENBANK™ accession no. Z33381),  Aspergillus aculeatus  endoglucanase (Ooi et al., 1990 , Nucleic Acids Research  18: 5884),  Aspergillus kawachii  endoglucanase (Sakamoto et al., 1995 , Current Genetics  27: 435-439),  Erwinia carotovara  endoglucanase (Saarilahti et al., 1990 , Gene  90: 9-14),  Fusarium oxysporum  endoglucanase (GENBANK™ accession no. L29381),  Humicola grisea  var.  thermoidea  endoglucanase (GENBANK™ accession no. AB003107),  Melanocarpus albomyces  endoglucanase (GENBANK™ accession no. MAL515703),  Neurospora crassa  endoglucanase (GENBANK™ accession no. XM — 324477),  Humicola insolens  endoglucanase V,  Myceliophthora thermophila  CBS 117.65 endoglucanase, basidiomycete CBS 495.95 endoglucanase, basidiomycete CBS 494.95 endoglucanase,  Thielavia terrestris  NRRL 8126 CEL6B endoglucanase,  Thielavia terrestris  NRRL 8126 CEL6C endoglucanase,  Thielavia terrestris  NRRL 8126 CEL7C endoglucanase,  Thielavia terrestris  NRRL 8126 CEL7E endoglucanase,  Thielavia terrestris  NRRL 8126 CEL7F endoglucanase,  Cladorrhinum foecundissimum  ATCC 62373 CEL7A endoglucanase, and  Trichoderma reesei  strain No. VTT-D-80133 endoglucanase (GENBANK™ accession no. M15665). 
     Examples of cellobiohydrolases useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to,  Aspergillus aculeatus  cellobiohydrolase II (WO 2011/059740),  Chaetomium thermophilum  cellobiohydrolase I,  Chaetomium  thermophilum cellobiohydrolase II,  Humicola insolens  cellobiohydrolase I,  Myceliophthora thermophila  cellobiohydrolase II (WO 2009/042871),  Thielavia hyrcanie  cellobiohydrolase II (WO 2010/141325),  Thielavia terrestris  cellobiohydrolase II (CEL6A, WO 2006/074435),  Trichoderma reesei  cellobiohydrolase I,  Trichoderma reesei  cellobiohydrolase II, and  Trichophaea saccata  cellobiohydrolase II (WO 2010/057086). 
     Examples of beta-glucosidases useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to, beta-glucosidases from  Aspergillus aculeatus  (Kawaguchi et al., 1996 , Gene  173: 287-288),  Aspergillus fumigatus  (WO 2005/047499),  Aspergillus niger  (Dan et al., 2000 , J. Biol. Chem.  275: 4973-4980),  Aspergillus oryzae  (WO 2002/095014),  Penicillium brasilianum  IBT 20888 (WO 2007/019442 and WO 2010/088387),  Thielavia terrestris  (WO 2011/035029), and  Trichophaea saccata  (WO 2007/019442). 
     The beta-glucosidase may be a fusion protein. In one aspect, the beta-glucosidase is an  Aspergillus oryzae  beta-glucosidase variant BG fusion protein (WO 2008/057637) or an  Aspergillus oryzae  beta-glucosidase fusion protein (WO 2008/057637. 
     Other useful endoglucanases, cellobiohydrolases, and beta-glucosidases are disclosed in numerous Glycosyl Hydrolase families using the classification according to Henrissat B., 1991, A classification of glycosyl hydrolases based on amino-acid sequence similarities,  Biochem. J.  280: 309-316, and Henrissat B., and Bairoch A., 1996, Updating the sequence-based classification of glycosyl hydrolases,  Biochem. J.  316: 695-696. 
     Other cellulolytic enzymes that may be used in the present invention are described in WO 98/13465, WO 98/015619, WO 98/015633, WO 99/06574, WO 99/10481, WO 99/025847, WO 99/031255, WO 2002/101078, WO 2003/027306, WO 2003/052054, WO 2003/052055, WO 2003/052056, WO 2003/052057, WO 2003/052118, WO 2004/016760, WO 2004/043980, WO 2004/048592, WO 2005/001065, WO 2005/028636, WO 2005/093050, WO 2005/093073, WO 2006/074005, WO 2006/117432, WO 2007/071818, WO 2007/071820, WO 2008/008070, WO 2008/008793, U.S. Pat. No. 5,457,046, U.S. Pat. No. 5,648,263, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,686,593. 
     In the methods of the present invention, any GH61 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity can be used. 
     In a first aspect, the GH61 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity comprises the following motifs:
         [ILMV]-P-X(4,5)-G-X-Y-[ILMV]-X-R-X-[EQ]-X(4)-[HNQ] and [FW]-[TF]-K-[AIV],
 
wherein X is any amino acid, X(4,5) is any amino acid at 4 or 5 contiguous positions, and X(4) is any amino acid at 4 contiguous positions.
       

     The isolated polypeptide comprising the above-noted motifs may further comprise:
         H-X(1,2)-G-P-X(3)-[YW]-[AILMV],   [EQ]-X-Y-X(2)-C-X-[EHQN]-[FILV]-X-[ILV], or   H-X(1,2)-G-P-X(3)-[YW]-[AILMV] and [EQ]X-Y-X(2)-C-X-[EHQN]-[FILV]-X-[ILV],
 
wherein X is any amino acid, X(1,2) is any amino acid at 1 position or 2 contiguous positions, X(3) is any amino acid at 3 contiguous positions, and X(2) is any amino acid at 2 contiguous positions. In the above motifs, the accepted IUPAC single letter amino acid abbreviation is employed.
       

     In a preferred embodiment, the isolated GH61 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity further comprises H-X(1,2)-G-P-X(3)-[YW]-[AILMV]. In another preferred embodiment, the isolated GH61 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity further comprises [EQ]-X-Y-X(2)-C-X-[EHQN]-[FILV]-X-[ILV]. In another preferred embodiment, the isolated GH61 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity further comprises H-X(1,2)-G-P-X(3)-[YW]-[AILMV] and [EQ]-X-Y-X(2)-C-X-[EHQN]-[FILV]-X-[ILV]. 
     In a second aspect, isolated polypeptides having cellulolytic enhancing activity, comprise the following motif:
         [ILMV]-P-X(4,5)-G-X-Y-[ILMV]-X-R-X-[EQ]-X(3)-A-[HNQ],       

     wherein X is any amino acid, X(4,5) is any amino acid at 4 or 5 contiguous positions, and X(3) is any amino acid at 3 contiguous positions. In the above motif, the accepted IUPAC single letter amino acid abbreviation is employed. 
     Examples of GH61 polypeptides having cellulolytic enhancing activity useful in the methods of the present invention include, but are not limited to, GH61 polypeptides from  Thielavia terrestris  (WO 2005/074647, WO 2008/148131, and WO 2011/035027),  Thermoascus aurantiacus  (WO 2005/074656 and WO 2010/065830),  Trichoderma reesei  (WO 2007/089290),  Myceliophthora thermophila  (WO 2009/085935, WO 2009/085859, WO 2009/085864, WO 2009/085868),  Aspergillus fumigatus  (WO 2010/138754), GH61 polypeptides from  Penicillium pinophilum  (WO 2011/005867),  Thermoascus  sp. (WO 2011/039319),  Penicillium  sp. (WO 2011/041397), and  Thermoascus crustaceous  (WO 2011/041504). 
     In one aspect, the GH61 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity is used in the presence of a soluble activating divalent metal cation according to WO 2008/151043, e.g., manganese sulfate. 
     In another aspect, the GH61 polypeptide having cellulolytic enhancing activity is used in the presence of a dioxy compound, a bicylic compound, a heterocyclic compound, a nitrogen-containing compound, a quinone compound, a sulfur-containing compound, or a liquor obtained from a pretreated cellulosic material such as pretreated corn stover (PCS). 
     The dioxy compound may include any suitable compound containing two or more oxygen atoms. In some aspects, the dioxy compounds contain a substituted aryl moiety as described herein. The dioxy compounds may comprise one or more (e.g., several) hydroxyl and/or hydroxyl derivatives, but also include substituted aryl moieties lacking hydroxyl and hydroxyl derivatives. Non-limiting examples of the dioxy compounds include pyrocatechol or catechol; caffeic acid; 3,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid; 4-tert-butyl-5-methoxy-1,2-benzenediol; pyrogallol; gallic acid; methyl-3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate; 2,3,4-trihydroxybenzophenone; 2,6-dimethoxyphenol; sinapinic acid; 3,5-dihydroxybenzoic acid; 4-chloro-1,2-benzenediol; 4-nitro-1,2-benzenediol; tannic acid; ethyl gallate; methyl glycolate; dihydroxyfumaric acid; 2-butyne-1,4-diol; (croconic acid; 1,3-propanediol; tartaric acid; 2,4-pentanediol; 3-ethyoxy-1,2-propanediol; 2,4,4′-trihydroxybenzophenone; cis-2-butene-1,4-diol; 3,4-dihydroxy-3-cyclobutene-1,2-dione; dihydroxyacetone; acrolein acetal; methyl-4-hydroxybenzoate; 4-hydroxybenzoic acid; and methyl-3,5-dimethoxy-4-hydroxybenzoate; or a salt or solvate thereof. 
     The bicyclic compound may include any suitable substituted fused ring system as described herein. The compounds may comprise one or more (e.g., several) additional rings, and are not limited to a specific number of rings unless otherwise stated. In one aspect, the bicyclic compound is a flavonoid. In another aspect, the bicyclic compound is an optionally substituted isoflavonoid. In another aspect, the bicyclic compound is an optionally substituted flavylium ion, such as an optionally substituted anthocyanidin or optionally substituted anthocyanin, or derivative thereof. Non-limiting examples of the bicyclic compounds include epicatechin; quercetin; myricetin; taxifolin; kaempferol; morin; acacetin; naringenin; isorhamnetin; apigenin; cyanidin; cyanin; kuromanin; keracyanin; or a salt or solvate thereof. 
     The heterocyclic compound may be any suitable compound, such as an optionally substituted aromatic or non-aromatic ring comprising a heteroatom, as described herein. In one aspect, the heterocyclic is a compound comprising an optionally substituted heterocycloalkyl moiety or an optionally substituted heteroaryl moiety. In another aspect, the optionally substituted heterocycloalkyl moiety or optionally substituted heteroaryl moiety is an optionally substituted 5-membered heterocycloalkyl or an optionally substituted 5-membered heteroaryl moiety. In another aspect, the optionally substituted heterocycloalkyl or optionally substituted heteroaryl moiety is an optionally substituted moiety selected from pyrazolyl, furanyl, imidazolyl, isoxazolyl, oxadiazolyl, oxazolyl, pyrrolyl, pyridyl, pyrimidyl, pyridazinyl, thiazolyl, triazolyl, thienyl, dihydrothieno-pyrazolyl, thianaphthenyl, carbazolyl, benzimidazolyl, benzothienyl, benzofuranyl, indolyl, quinolinyl, benzotriazolyl, benzothiazolyl, benzooxazolyl, benzimidazolyl, isoquinolinyl, isoindolyl, acridinyl, benzoisazolyl, dimethylhydantoin, pyrazinyl, tetrahydrofuranyl, pyrrolinyl, pyrrolidinyl, morpholinyl, indolyl, diazepinyl, azepinyl, thiepinyl, piperidinyl, and oxepinyl. In another aspect, the optionally substituted heterocycloalkyl moiety or optionally substituted heteroaryl moiety is an optionally substituted furanyl. Non-limiting examples of the heterocyclic compounds include (1,2-dihydroxyethyl)-3,4-dihydroxyfuran-2(5H)-one; 4-hydroxy-5-methyl-3-furanone; 5-hydroxy-2(5H)-furanone; [1,2-dihydroxyethyl]furan-2,3,4(5H)-trione; α-hydroxy-γ-butyrolactone; ribonic γ-lactone; aldohexuronicaldohexuronic acid γ-lactone; gluconic acid 5-lactone; 4-hydroxycoumarin; dihydrobenzofuran; 5-(hydroxymethyl)furfural; furoin; 2(5H)-furanone; 5,6-dihydro-2H-pyran-2-one; and 5,6-dihydro-4-hydroxy-6-methyl-2H-pyran-2-one; or a salt or solvate thereof. 
     The nitrogen-containing compound may be any suitable compound with one or more nitrogen atoms. In one aspect, the nitrogen-containing compound comprises an amine, imine, hydroxylamine, or nitroxide moiety. Non-limiting examples of thenitrogen-containing compounds include acetone oxime; violuric acid; pyridine-2-aldoxime; 2-aminophenol; 1,2-benzenediamine; 2,2,6,6-tetramethyl-1-piperidinyloxy; 5,6,7,8-tetrahydrobiopterin; 6,7-dimethyl-5,6,7,8-tetrahydropterine; and maleamic acid; or a salt or solvate thereof. 
     The quinone compound may be any suitable compound comprising a quinone moiety as described herein. Non-limiting examples of the quinone compounds include 1,4-benzoquinone; 1,4-naphthoquinone; 2-hydroxy-1,4-naphthoquinone; 2,3-dimethoxy-5-methyl-1,4-benzoquinone or coenzyme Q 0 ; 2,3,5,6-tetramethyl-1,4-benzoquinone or duroquinone; 1,4-dihydroxyanthraquinone; 3-hydroxy-1-methyl-5,6-indolinedione or adrenochrome; 4-tert-butyl-5-methoxy-1,2-benzoquinone; pyrroloquinoline quinone; or a salt or solvate thereof. 
     The sulfur-containing compound may be any suitable compound comprising one or more sulfur atoms. In one aspect, the sulfur-containing comprises a moiety selected from thionyl, thioether, sulfinyl, sulfonyl, sulfamide, sulfonamide, sulfonic acid, and sulfonic ester. Non-limiting examples of the sulfur-containing compounds include ethanethiol; 2-propanethiol; 2-propene-1-thiol; 2-mercaptoethanesulfonic acid; benzenethiol; benzene-1,2-dithiol; cysteine; methionine; glutathione; cystine; or a salt or solvate thereof. 
     In one aspect, an effective amount of such a compound described above to cellulosic material as a molar ratio to glucosyl units of cellulose is about 10 −6  to about 10, e.g., about 10 −6  to about 7.5, about 10 −6  to about 5, about 10 −6  to about 2.5, about 10 −6  to about 1, about 10 −5  to about 1, about 10 −5  to about 10 −1 , about 10 −4  to about 10 −1 , about 10 −3  to about 10 −1 , or about 10 −3  to about 10 −2 . In another aspect, an effective amount of such a compound described above is about 0.1 μM to about 1 M, e.g., about 0.5 μM to about 0.75 M, about 0.75 μM to about 0.5 M, about 1 μM to about 0.25 M, about 1 μM to about 0.1 M, about 5 μM to about 50 mM, about 10 μM to about 25 mM, about 50 μM to about 25 mM, about 10 μM to about 10 mM, about 5 μM to about 5 mM, or about 0.1 mM to about 1 mM. 
     The term “liquor” means the solution phase, either aqueous, organic, or a combination thereof, arising from treatment of a lignocellulose and/or hemicellulose material in a slurry, or monosaccharides thereof, e.g., xylose, arabinose, mannose, etc., under conditions as described herein, and the soluble contents thereof. A liquor for cellulolytic enhancement of a GH61 polypeptide can be produced by treating a lignocellulose or hemicellulose material (or feedstock) by applying heat and/or pressure, optionally in the presence of a catalyst, e.g., acid, optionally in the presence of an organic solvent, and optionally in combination with physical disruption of the material, and then separating the solution from the residual solids. Such conditions determine the degree of cellulolytic enhancement obtainable through the combination of liquor and a GH61 polypeptide during hydrolysis of a cellulosic substrate by a cellulase preparation. The liquor can be separated from the treated material using a method standard in the art, such as filtration, sedimentation, or centrifugation. 
     In one aspect, an effective amount of the liquor to cellulose is about 10 −6  to about 10 g per g of cellulose, e.g., about 10 −6  to about 7.5 g, about 10 −6  to about 5, about 10 −6  to about 2.5 g, about 10 −6  to about 1 g, about 10 −5  to about 1 g, about 10 −5  to about 10 −1  g, about 10 −4  to about 10 −1  g, about 10 −3  to about 10 −1  g, or about 10 −3  to about 10 −2  g per g of cellulose. 
     In one aspect, the one or more (e.g., several) hemicellulolytic enzymes comprise a commercial hemicellulolytic enzyme preparation. Examples of commercial hemicellulolytic enzyme preparations suitable for use in the present invention include, for example, SHEARZYME™ (Novozymes A/S), CELLIC® HTec (Novozymes A/S), CELLIC® HTec2 (Novozymes A/S), VISCOZYME® (Novozymes A/S), ULTRAFLO® (Novozymes A/S), PULPZYME® HC (Novozymes A/S), MULTIFECT® Xylanase (Genencor), ACCELLERASE®XY (Genencor), ACCELLERASE® XC (Genencor), ECOPULP® TX-200A (AB Enzymes), HSP 6000 Xylanase (DSM), DEPOL™ 333P (Biocatalysts Limit, Wales, UK), DEPOL™ 740L. (Biocatalysts Limit, Wales, UK), and DEPOL™ 762P (Biocatalysts Limit, Wales, UK). 
     Examples of xylanases useful in the processes of the present invention include, but are not limited to, xylanases from  Aspergillus aculeatus  (GeneSeqP:AAR63790; WO 94/21785),  Aspergillus fumigatus  (WO 2006/078256),  Penicillium pinophilum  (WO 2011/041405),  Penicillium  sp. (WO 2010/126772),  Thielavia terrestris  NRRL 8126 (WO 2009/079210), and  Trichophaea saccata  GH10 (WO 2011/057083). 
     Examples of beta-xylosidases useful in the processes of the present invention include, but are not limited to, beta-xylosidases from  Neurospora crassa  (SwissProt accession number Q7SOW4),  Trichoderma reesei  (UniProtKB/TrEMBL accession number Q92458), and  Talaromyces emersonii  (SwissProt accession number Q8×212). 
     Examples of acetylxylan esterases useful in the processes of the present invention include, but are not limited to, acetylxylan esterases from  Aspergillus aculeatus  (WO 2010/108918),  Chaetomium globosum  (Uniprot accession number Q2GWX4),  Chaetomium gracile  (GeneSeqP accession number AAB82124),  Humicola insolens  DSM 1800 (WO 2009/073709),  Hypocrea jecorina  (WO 2005/001036),  Myceliophtera thermophila  (WO 2010/014880),  Neurospora crassa  (UniProt accession number q7s259),  Phaeosphaeria nodorum  (Uniprot accession number QOUHJ1), and  Thielavia terrestris  NRRL 8126 (WO 2009/042846). 
     Examples of feruloyl esterases (ferulic acid esterases) useful in the processes of the present invention include, but are not limited to, feruloyl esterases form  Humicola insolens  DSM 1800 (WO 2009/076122),  Neosartorya fischeri  (UniProt Accession number A1D9T4),  Neurospora crassa  (UniProt accession number Q9HGR3),  Penicillium aurantiogriseum  (WO 2009/127729), and  Thielavia terrestris  (WO 2010/053838 and WO 2010/065448). 
     Examples of arabinofuranosidases useful in the processes of the present invention include, but are not limited to, arabinofuranosidases from  Aspergillus niger  (GeneSeqP accession number AAR94170),  Humicola insolens  DSM 1800 (WO 2006/114094 and WO 2009/073383), and  M. giganteus  (WO 2006/114094). 
     Examples of alpha-glucuronidases useful in the processes of the present invention include, but are not limited to, alpha-glucuronidases from  Aspergillus clavatus  (UniProt accession number alccl2),  Aspergillus fumigatus  (SwissProt accession number Q4WW45),  Aspergillus niger  (Uniprot accession number Q96WX9),  Aspergillus terreus  (SwissProt accession number QOCJP9),  Humicola insolens  (WO 2010/014706),  Penicillium aurantiogriseum  (WO 2009/068565),  Talaromyces emersonii  (UniProt accession number Q8×211), and  Trichoderma reesei  (Uniprot accession number Q99024). 
     The polypeptides having enzyme activity used in the processes of the present invention may be produced by fermentation of the above-noted microbial strains on a nutrient medium containing suitable carbon and nitrogen sources and inorganic salts, using procedures known in the art (see, e.g., Bennett, J. W. and LaSure, L. (eds.),  More Gene Manipulations in Fungi , Academic Press, CA, 1991). Suitable media are available from commercial suppliers or may be prepared according to published compositions (e.g., in catalogues of the American Type Culture Collection). Temperature ranges and other conditions suitable for growth and enzyme production are known in the art (see, e.g., Bailey, J. E., and 011 is, D. F.,  Biochemical Engineering Fundamentals , McGraw-Hill Book Company, NY, 1986). 
     The fermentation can be any method of cultivation of a cell resulting in the expression or isolation of an enzyme or protein. Fermentation may, therefore, be understood as comprising shake flask cultivation, or small- or large-scale fermentation (including continuous, batch, fed-batch, or solid state fermentations) in laboratory or industrial fermentors performed in a suitable medium and under conditions allowing the enzyme to be expressed or isolated. The resulting enzymes produced by the methods described above may be recovered from the fermentation medium and purified by conventional procedures. 
     Fermentation 
     The fermentable sugars obtained from the hydrolyzed cellulosic material can be fermented by one or more (e.g., several) fermenting microorganisms capable of fermenting the sugars directly or indirectly into a desired fermentation product. “Fermentation” or “fermentation process” refers to any fermentation process or any process comprising a fermentation step. Fermentation processes also include fermentation processes used in the consumable alcohol industry (e.g., beer and wine), dairy industry (e.g., fermented dairy products), leather industry, and tobacco industry. The fermentation conditions depend on the desired fermentation product and fermenting organism and can easily be determined by one skilled in the art. 
     In the fermentation step, sugars, released from the cellulosic material as a result of the pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis steps, are fermented to a product, e.g., ethanol, by a fermenting organism, such as yeast. Hydrolysis (saccharification) and fermentation can be separate or simultaneous, as described herein. 
     Any suitable hydrolyzed cellulosic material can be used in the fermentation step in practicing the present invention. The material is generally selected based on the desired fermentation product, i.e., the substance to be obtained from the fermentation, and the process employed, as is well known in the art. 
     The term “fermentation medium” is understood herein to refer to a medium before the fermenting microorganism(s) is(are) added, such as, a medium resulting from a saccharification process, as well as a medium used in a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation process (SSF). 
     “Fermenting microorganism” refers to any microorganism, including bacterial and fungal organisms, suitable for use in a desired fermentation process to produce a fermentation product. The fermenting organism can be hexose and/or pentose fermenting organisms, or a combination thereof. Both hexose and pentose fermenting organisms are well known in the art. Suitable fermenting microorganisms are able to ferment, i.e., convert, sugars, such as glucose, xylose, xylulose, arabinose, maltose, mannose, galactose, and/or oligosaccharides, directly or indirectly into the desired fermentation product. Examples of bacterial and fungal fermenting organisms producing ethanol are described by Lin et al., 2006 , Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.  69: 627-642. 
     Examples of fermenting microorganisms that can ferment hexose sugars include bacterial and fungal organisms, such as yeast. Preferred yeast includes strains of  Candida, Kluyveromyces , and  Saccharomyces , e.g.,  Candida sonorensis, Kluyveromyces marxianus , and  Saccharomyces cerevisiae.    
     Examples of fermenting organisms that can ferment pentose sugars in their native state include bacterial and fungal organisms, such as some yeast. Preferred xylose fermenting yeast include strains of  Candida , preferably  C. sheatae  or  C. sonorensis ; and strains of  Pichia , preferably  P. stipitis , such as  P. stipitis  CBS 5773. Preferred pentose fermenting yeast include strains of  Pachysolen , preferably  P. tannophilus . Organisms not capable of fermenting pentose sugars, such as xylose and arabinose, may be genetically modified to do so by methods known in the art. 
     Examples of bacteria that can efficiently ferment hexose and pentose to ethanol include, for example,  Bacillus coagulans, Clostridium acetobutylicum, Clostridium thermocellum, Clostridium phytofermentans, Geobacillus  sp.,  Thermoanaerobacter saccharolyticum , and  Zymomonas mobilis  (Philippidis, 1996, supra). 
     Other fermenting organisms include strains of  Bacillus , such as  Bacillus coagulans; Candida , such as  C. sonorensis, C. methanosorbosa, C. diddensiae, C. parapsilosis, C. naedodendra, C. blankii, C. entomophilia, C. brassicae, C. pseudotropicalis, C. boidinii, C. utilis , and  C. scehatae; Clostridium , such as  C. acetobutylicum, C. thermocellum , and  C. phytofermentans; E. coli , especially  E. coli  strains that have been genetically modified to improve the yield of ethanol;  Geobacillus  sp.;  Hansenula , such as  Hansenula anomala; Klebsiella , such as  K. oxytoca; Kluyveromyces , such as  K. marxianus, K. lactis, K. thermotolerans , and  K. fragilis; Schizosaccharomyces , such as  S. pombe; Thermoanaerobacter , such as  Thermoanaerobacter saccharolyticum ; and  Zymomonas , such as  Zymomonas mobilis.    
     In a preferred aspect, the yeast is a  Bretannomyces . In a more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Bretannomyces clausenii . In another preferred aspect, the yeast is a  Candida . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Candida sonorensis . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Candida boidinii . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Candida blankii . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Candida brassicae . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Candida diddensii . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Candida entomophiliia . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Candida pseudotropicalis . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Candida scehatae . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Candida utilis . In another preferred aspect, the yeast is a  Clavispora . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Clavispora lusitaniae . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Clavispora opuntiae . In another preferred aspect, the yeast is a  Kluyveromyces . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Kluyveromyces fragilis . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Kluyveromyces marxianus . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Kluyveromyces thermotolerans . In another preferred aspect, the yeast is a  Pachysolen.  In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Pachysolen tannophilus.  In another preferred aspect, the yeast is a  Pichia . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is a  Pichia stipitis . In another preferred aspect, the yeast is a  Saccharomyces  spp. In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Saccharomyces cerevisiae . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Saccharomyces distaticus . In another more preferred aspect, the yeast is  Saccharomyces uvarum.    
     In a preferred aspect, the bacterium is a  Bacillus . In a more preferred aspect, the bacterium is  Bacillus coagulans . In another preferred aspect, the bacterium is a  Clostridium . In another more preferred aspect, the bacterium is  Clostridium acetobutylicum . In another more preferred aspect, the bacterium is  Clostridium phytofermentans . In another more preferred aspect, the bacterium is  Clostridium thermocellum . In another more preferred aspect, the bacterium is  Geobacilus  sp. In another more preferred aspect, the bacterium is a Thermoanaerobacter. In another more preferred aspect, the bacterium is  Thermoanaerobacter saccharolyticum . In another preferred aspect, the bacterium is a  Zymomonas . In another more preferred aspect, the bacterium is  Zymomonas mobilis.    
     Commercially available yeast suitable for ethanol production include, e.g., BIOFERM™ AFT and XR (NABC—North American Bioproducts Corporation, GA, USA), ETHANOL RED™ yeast (Fermentis/Lesaffre, USA), FALI™ (Fleischmann&#39;s Yeast, USA), FERMIOL™ (DSM Specialties), GERT STRAND™ (Gert Strand AB, Sweden), and SUPERSTART™ and THERMOSACC™ fresh yeast (Ethanol Technology, WI, USA). 
     In a preferred aspect, the fermenting microorganism has been genetically modified to provide the ability to ferment pentose sugars, such as xylose utilizing, arabinose utilizing, and xylose and arabinose co-utilizing microorganisms. 
     The cloning of heterologous genes into various fermenting microorganisms has led to the construction of organisms capable of converting hexoses and pentoses to ethanol (co-fermentation) (Chen and Ho, 1993, Cloning and improving the expression of  Pichia stipitis  xylose reductase gene in  Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.  39-40: 135-147; Ho et al., 1998, Genetically engineered  Saccharomyces  yeast capable of effectively cofermenting glucose and xylose,  Appl. Environ. Microbiol.  64: 1852-1859; Kotter and Ciriacy, 1993, Xylose fermentation by  Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.  38: 776-783; Walfridsson et al., 1995, Xylose-metabolizing  Saccharomyces cerevisiae  strains overexpressing the TKL1 and TALI genes encoding the pentose phosphate pathway enzymes transketolase and transaldolase,  Appl. Environ. Microbiol.  61: 4184-4190; Kuyper et al., 2004, Minimal metabolic engineering of  Saccharomyces cerevisiae  for efficient anaerobic xylose fermentation: a proof of principle,  FEMS Yeast Research  4: 655-664; Beall et al., 1991, Parametric studies of ethanol production from xylose and other sugars by recombinant  Escherichia coli, Biotech. Bioeng.  38: 296-303; Ingram et al., 1998, Metabolic engineering of bacteria for ethanol production,  Biotechnol. Bioeng.  58: 204-214; Zhang et al., 1995, Metabolic engineering of a pentose metabolism pathway in ethanologenic  Zymomonas mobilis, Science  267: 240-243; Deanda et al., 1996, Development of an arabinose-fermenting  Zymomonas mobilis  strain by metabolic pathway engineering,  Appl. Environ. Microbiol.  62: 4465-4470; WO 2003/062430, xylose isomerase). 
     In a preferred aspect, the genetically modified fermenting microorganism is  Candida sonorensis . In another preferred aspect, the genetically modified fermenting microorganism is  Escherichia coli . In another preferred aspect, the genetically modified fermenting microorganism is  Klebsiella oxytoca . In another preferred aspect, the genetically modified fermenting microorganism is  Kluyveromyces marxianus . In another preferred aspect, the genetically modified fermenting microorganism is  Saccharomyces cerevisiae . In another preferred aspect, the genetically modified fermenting microorganism is  Zymomonas mobilis.    
     It is well known in the art that the organisms described above can also be used to produce other substances, as described herein. 
     The fermenting microorganism is typically added to the degraded cellulosic material or hydrolysate and the fermentation is performed for about 8 to about 96 hours, e.g., about 24 to about 60 hours. The temperature is typically between about 26° C. to about 60° C., e.g., about 32° C. or 50° C., and about pH 3 to about pH 8, e.g., pH 4-5, 6, or 7. 
     In one aspect, the yeast and/or another microorganism are applied to the degraded cellulosic material and the fermentation is performed for about 12 to about 96 hours, such as typically 24-60 hours. In another aspect, the temperature is preferably between about 20° C. to about 60° C., e.g., about 25° C. to about 50° C., about 32° C. to about 50° C., or about 32° C. to about 50° C., and the pH is generally from about pH 3 to about pH 7, e.g., about pH 4 to about pH 7. However, some fermenting organisms, e.g., bacteria, have higher fermentation temperature optima. Yeast or another microorganism is preferably applied in amounts of approximately 10 5  to 10 12 , preferably from approximately 10 7  to 10 10 , especially approximately 2×10 8  viable cell count per ml of fermentation broth. Further guidance in respect of using yeast for fermentation can be found in, e.g., “The Alcohol Textbook” (Editors K. Jacques, T. P. Lyons and D. R. Kelsall, Nottingham University Press, United Kingdom 1999), which is hereby incorporated by reference. 
     For ethanol production, following the fermentation the fermented slurry is distilled to extract the ethanol. The ethanol obtained according to the processes of the invention can be used as, e.g., fuel ethanol, drinking ethanol, i.e., potable neutral spirits, or industrial ethanol. 
     A fermentation stimulator can be used in combination with any of the processes described herein to further improve the fermentation process, and in particular, the performance of the fermenting microorganism, such as, rate enhancement and ethanol yield. A “fermentation stimulator” refers to stimulators for growth of the fermenting microorganisms, in particular, yeast. Preferred fermentation stimulators for growth include vitamins and minerals. Examples of vitamins include multivitamins, biotin, pantothenate, nicotinic acid, meso-inositol, thiamine, pyridoxine, para-aminobenzoic acid, folic acid, riboflavin, and Vitamins A, B, C, D, and E. See, for example, Alfenore et al., Improving ethanol production and viability of  Saccharomyces cerevisiae  by a vitamin feeding strategy during fed-batch process, Springer-Verlag (2002), which is hereby incorporated by reference. Examples of minerals include minerals and mineral salts that can supply nutrients comprising P, K, Mg, S, Ca, Fe, Zn, Mn, and Cu. 
     Fermentation Products 
     A fermentation product can be any substance derived from the fermentation. The fermentation product can be, without limitation, an alcohol (e.g., arabinitol, n-butanol, isobutanol, ethanol, glycerol, methanol, ethylene glycol, 1,3-propanediol [propylene glycol], butanediol, glycerin, sorbitol, and xylitol); an alkane (e.g., pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, nonane, decane, undecane, and dodecane), a cycloalkane (e.g., cyclopentane, cyclohexane, cycloheptane, and cyclooctane), an alkene (e.g. pentene, hexene, heptene, and octene); an amino acid (e.g., aspartic acid, glutamic acid, glycine, lysine, serine, and threonine); a gas (e.g., methane, hydrogen (H 2 ), carbon dioxide (CO 2 ), and carbon monoxide (CO)); isoprene; a ketone (e.g., acetone); an organic acid (e.g., acetic acid, acetonic acid, adipic acid, ascorbic acid, citric acid, 2,5-diketo-D-gluconic acid, formic acid, fumaric acid, glucaric acid, gluconic acid, glucuronic acid, glutaric acid, 3-hydroxypropionic acid, itaconic acid, lactic acid, malic acid, malonic acid, oxalic acid, oxaloacetic acid, propionic acid, succinic acid, and xylonic acid); and polyketide. The fermentation product can also be protein as a high value product. 
     In a preferred aspect, the fermentation product is an alcohol. It will be understood that the term “alcohol” encompasses a substance that contains one or more hydroxyl moieties. In a more preferred aspect, the alcohol is n-butanol. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is isobutanol. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is ethanol. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is methanol. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is arabinitol. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is butanediol. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is ethylene glycol. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is glycerin. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is glycerol. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is 1,3-propanediol. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is sorbitol. In another more preferred aspect, the alcohol is xylitol. See, for example, Gong, C. S., Cao, N. J., Du, J., and Tsao, G. T., 1999, Ethanol production from renewable resources, in  Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology , Scheper, T., ed., Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, Germany, 65: 207-241; Silveira, M. M., and Jonas, R., 2002, The biotechnological production of sorbitol,  Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.  59: 400-408; Nigam, P., and Singh, D., 1995, Processes for fermentative production of xylitol—a sugar substitute,  Process Biochemistry  30 (2): 117-124; Ezeji, T. C., Qureshi, N. and Blaschek, H. P., 2003, Production of acetone, butanol and ethanol by  Clostridium beijerinckii  BA101 and in situ recovery by gas stripping,  World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology  19 (6): 595-603. 
     In another preferred aspect, the fermentation product is an alkane. The alkane can be an unbranched or a branched alkane. In another more preferred aspect, the alkane is pentane. In another more preferred aspect, the alkane is hexane. In another more preferred aspect, the alkane is heptane. In another more preferred aspect, the alkane is octane. In another more preferred aspect, the alkane is nonane. In another more preferred aspect, the alkane is decane. In another more preferred aspect, the alkane is undecane. In another more preferred aspect, the alkane is dodecane. 
     In another preferred aspect, the fermentation product is a cycloalkane. In another more preferred aspect, the cycloalkane is cyclopentane. In another more preferred aspect, the cycloalkane is cyclohexane. In another more preferred aspect, the cycloalkane is cycloheptane. In another more preferred aspect, the cycloalkane is cyclooctane. 
     In another preferred aspect, the fermentation product is an alkene. The alkene can be an unbranched or a branched alkene. In another more preferred aspect, the alkene is pentene. In another more preferred aspect, the alkene is hexene. In another more preferred aspect, the alkene is heptene. In another more preferred aspect, the alkene is octene. 
     In another preferred aspect, the fermentation product is an amino acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is aspartic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the amino acid is glutamic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the amino acid is glycine. In another more preferred aspect, the amino acid is lysine. In another more preferred aspect, the amino acid is serine. In another more preferred aspect, the amino acid is threonine. See, for example, Richard, A., and Margaritis, A., 2004, Empirical modeling of batch fermentation kinetics for poly(glutamic acid) production and other microbial biopolymers,  Biotechnology and Bioengineering  87 (4): 501-515. 
     In another preferred aspect, the fermentation product is a gas. In another more preferred aspect, the gas is methane. In another more preferred aspect, the gas is H 2 . In another more preferred aspect, the gas is CO 2 . In another more preferred aspect, the gas is CO. See, for example, Kataoka, N., A. Miya, and K. Kiriyama, 1997, Studies on hydrogen production by continuous culture system of hydrogen-producing anaerobic bacteria, Water  Science and Technology  36 (6-7): 41-47; and Gunaseelan V. N. in  Biomass and Bioenergy , Vol. 13 (1-2), pp. 83-114, 1997, Anaerobic digestion of biomass for methane production: A review. 
     In another preferred aspect, the fermentation product is isoprene. 
     In another preferred aspect, the fermentation product is a ketone. It will be understood that the term “ketone” encompasses a substance that contains one or more ketone moieties. In another more preferred aspect, the ketone is acetone. See, for example, Qureshi and Blaschek, 2003, supra. 
     In another preferred aspect, the fermentation product is an organic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is acetic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is acetonic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is adipic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is ascorbic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is citric acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is 2,5-diketo-D-gluconic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is formic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is fumaric acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is glucaric acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is gluconic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is glucuronic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is glutaric acid. In another preferred aspect, the organic acid is 3-hydroxypropionic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is itaconic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is lactic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is malic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is malonic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is oxalic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is propionic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is succinic acid. In another more preferred aspect, the organic acid is xylonic acid. See, for example, Chen, R., and Lee, Y. Y., 1997, Membrane-mediated extractive fermentation for lactic acid production from cellulosic biomass,  Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.  63-65: 435-448. 
     In another preferred aspect, the fermentation product is polyketide. SHF, SSF, SSCF, HHF, SHCF, HHCF, DMC, and CBP: Hydrolysis (saccharification) and fermentation, separate or simultaneous, include, but are not limited to, separate hydrolysis and fermentation (SHF); simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF); simultaneous saccharification and co-fermentation (SSCF); hybrid hydrolysis and fermentation (HHF); separate hydrolysis and co-fermentation (SHCF); hybrid hydrolysis and co-fermentation (HHCF); and direct microbial conversion (DMC), also sometimes called consolidated bioprocessing (CBP). SHF uses separate process steps to first enzymatically hydrolyze the cellulosic material to fermentable sugars, e.g., glucose, cellobiose, and pentose monomers, and then ferment the fermentable sugars to ethanol. In SSF, the enzymatic hydrolysis of the cellulosic material and the fermentation of sugars to ethanol are combined in one step (Philippidis, G. P., 1996, Cellulose bioconversion technology, in  Handbook on Bioethanol: Production and Utilization , Wyman, C. E., ed., Taylor &amp; Francis, Washington, D.C., 179-212). SSCF involves the co-fermentation of multiple sugars (Sheehan, J., and Himmel, M., 1999, Enzymes, energy and the environment: A strategic perspective on the U.S. Department of Energy&#39;s research and development activities for bioethanol,  Biotechnol. Prog.  15: 817-827). HHF involves a separate hydrolysis step, and in addition a simultaneous saccharification and hydrolysis step, which can be carried out in the same reactor. The steps in an HHF process can be carried out at different temperatures, i.e., high temperature enzymatic saccharification followed by SSF at a lower temperature that the fermentation strain can tolerate. DMC combines all three processes (enzyme production, hydrolysis, and fermentation) in one or more (e.g., several) steps where the same organism is used to produce the enzymes for conversion of the cellulosic material to fermentable sugars and to convert the fermentable sugars into a final product (Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., and Pretorius, I. S., 2002, Microbial cellulose utilization: Fundamentals and biotechnology,  Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Reviews  66: 506-577). It is understood herein that any method known in the art comprising pretreatment, enzymatic hydrolysis (saccharification), fermentation, or a combination thereof, can be used in the practicing the processes of the present invention. 
     A conventional apparatus can include a fed-batch stirred reactor, a batch stirred reactor, a continuous flow stirred reactor with ultrafiltration, and/or a continuous plug-flow column reactor (Fernanda de Castilhos Corazza, Flàvio Faria de Moraes, Gisella Maria Zanin and Ivo Neitzel, 2003, Optimal control in fed-batch reactor for the cellobiose hydrolysis,  Acta Scientiarum. Technology  25: 33-38; Gusakov, A. V., and Sinitsyn, A. P., 1985, Kinetics of the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: 1. A mathematical model for a batch reactor process,  Enz. Microb. Technol.  7: 346-352), an attrition reactor (Ryu, S. K., and Lee, J. M., 1983, Bioconversion of waste cellulose by using an attrition bioreactor,  Biotechnol. Bioeng.  25: 53-65), or a reactor with intensive stirring induced by an electromagnetic field (Gusakov, A. V., Sinitsyn, A. P., Davydkin, I. Y., Davydkin, V. Y., Protas, O. V., 1996, Enhancement of enzymatic cellulose hydrolysis using a novel type of bioreactor with intensive stirring induced by electromagnetic field,  Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol.  56: 141-153). Additional reactor types include fluidized bed, upflow blanket, immobilized, and extruder type reactors for hydrolysis and/or fermentation. 
     Recovery 
     The fermentation product(s) can be optionally recovered from the fermentation medium using any method known in the art including, but not limited to, chromatography, electrophoretic procedures, differential solubility, distillation, or extraction. For example, alcohol is separated from the fermented cellulosic material and purified by conventional methods of distillation. Ethanol with a purity of up to about 96 vol. % can be obtained, which can be used as, for example, fuel ethanol, drinking ethanol, i.e., potable neutral spirits, or industrial ethanol. 
     The invention described and claimed herein is not to be limited in scope by the specific embodiments herein disclosed, since these embodiments are intended as illustrations of several aspects of the invention. Any equivalent embodiments are intended to be within the scope of this invention as well as combinations of one or more of the embodiments. Various modifications of the invention in addition to those shown and described herein will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the foregoing description. Such modifications are also intended to fall within the scope of the appended claims. 
     Various references are cited herein, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. The present invention is further described by the following examples which should not be construed as limiting the scope of the invention. 
     EXAMPLES 
     Example 1 
     Mixed Pre-Treated Corn Stover (Mixed PCS) Performed Better than Corn Stover Pre-Treated with Acid (Acidic PCS) and Corn Stover Pre-Treated with Alkaline (Alkaline PCS) 
     Unwashed acidic PCS: corn stover was milled to about 1 cm and soaked in sulfuric acid solution of 1.0% (w/w) at 50° C., 10% total solid (TS) for 2 hours. The feedstock was then dewatered to about 40% TS and treated using steam explosion at 170° C. for 5.5 minutes. 
     Unwashed alkaline PCS: corn stover was milled to about 1 cm and soaked in sodium hydroxide solution of 1.5% (w/w), 15% TS, 90° C. for 2 hours. 
     Mixed PCS: Unwashed acidic pre-treated corn stover (PCS) 44.95 g with TS of 39.10% was mixed with unwashed alkaline PCS 100 g with TS of 15.28% to make the pH of mixture PCS pH 5.0. The final TS for the mixed PCS was 22.67%. 
     Acidic PCS: unwashed acidic PCS was adjusted to pH 5.0 with 50% sodium hydroxide. 
     Alkaline PCS: unwashed alkaline PCS was adjusted to pH 5.0 with 10 mol sulfuric acid. 
     Mixed PCS, acidic PCS and alkaline PCS were hydrolyzed with an initial TS of 12.6% and total weight of 20 g, respectively.  Trichoderma reesei  cellulase composition (CELLIC™ CTec2 available from Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) was utilized for enzymatic hydrolysis with a ratio of  Trichoderma reesei  cellulase composition to cellulose of 5.3% (w/w). The hydrolysis process was performed at 50° C. and pH 5.0. Unless specified otherwise, the total hydrolysis time was 72 hours. After hydrolysis was finished, the sugar was analyzed by High Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC). 
     Fermentation was carried on with a yeast loading of 1.5 g/l at 32° C., pH 6.5, 150 rpm in 8 ml hydrolysate. Samples were taken right after inoculation (0 hr) and 3 days to measure the ethanol and residual sugar levels by HPLC. 
     For HPLC measure, the collected samples were filtered using 0.22 μm syringe filters (Millipore, Bedford, Mass., USA) and the filtrates were analyzed for sugar content as described below. The sugar concentrations of samples diluted in 0.005 M H 2 SO 4  were measured using a 7.8×300 mm AMINEX® HPX-87H column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, Calif., USA) by elution with 0.005 M H 2 SO 4  at 65° C. at a flow rate of 0.7 ml per minute, and quantization by integration of the glucose (or alternatively xylose) signal from refractive index detection (CHEMSTATION®, AGILENT® 1100 HPLC, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, Calif., USA) calibrated by pure sugar samples. The resultant glucose (or alternatively xylose) was used to calculate the percentage of glucose (or alternatively xylose) yield from glucans (or alternatively xylans) for each reaction. Measured sugar concentrations were adjusted for the appropriate dilution factor. The net concentrations of enzymatically-produced sugars were determined by adjusting the measured sugar concentrations for corresponding background sugar concentrations in unwashed biomass at zero time point. All HPLC data processing was performed using MICROSOFT EXCEL™ software (Microsoft, Richland, Wash., USA). 
     The degree of cellulose conversion to glucose (or alternatively the degree of xylan conversion to xylose) was calculated according to the following publication: Zhu, Y., et al. Calculating sugar yields in high solids hydrolysis of biomass.  Bioresource Technology  (2010), 102(3): 2897-2903. 
     Ethanol concentration was analyzed similarly as sugar content, and the yield of ethanol was calculated according to the following equation: 
       % ethanol yield=ethanol concentration/(sugar(glucose+xylose)concentration×0.5114).
 
     The results are shown in Table 1. It can be seen that the glucose conversion of mixed PCS was comparable to acidic PCS and much better than alkaline PCS. Xylose conversion of mixed PCS was the best among all tested PCS. Final ethanol yield of mixed PCS was also a little bit better than that of acidic PCS. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Glucose, xylose conversion and ethanol 
               
               
                 yield (%) of unwashed PCS 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Glucose 
                 Xylose 
                 Ethanol 
               
               
                   
                 conversion(%) 
                 conversion(%) 
                 yield(%) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Alkaline PCS 
                 53.98 
                 40.69 
                 45.86 
               
               
                 Acidic PCS 
                 88.06 
                 75.16 
                 64.92 
               
               
                 Mixed PCS 
                 85.24 
                 83.80 
                 68.71 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     To produce 1 ton ethanol, the amount of corn stover, sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide is shown in Table 2. It was observed that less chemical and feedstock was used for mixed PCS compared with alkaline PCS and acidic PCS. The mixed PCS had a lower total cost for corn stover, sulfuric acid and sodium hydroxide compared with alkaline PCS and acidic PCS. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Usage amount of feedstock &amp; chemical in 
               
               
                 the whole process (ton)/1 ton ethanol 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Corn 
                 Sulfuric 
                 Sodium 
                 Calculated 
               
               
                   
                 stover 
                 acid 
                 hydroxide 
                 total cost 
               
               
                   
                 (ton) 
                 (ton) 
                 (ton) 
                 (RMB) * 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Alkaline PCS 
                 6.69 
                 0.2 
                 0.67 
                 4287.5 
               
               
                 Acidic PCS 
                 5.25 
                 0.47 
                 0.3 
                 2842 
               
               
                 Mixed PCS 
                 5.18 
                 0.26 
                 0.23 
                 2548 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 * Based on the unit price (NaOH for 2800 RMB/ton, H 2 SO 4  for 350 RMB/ton, Corn stover for 350 RMB/ton) 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Example 2 
     Mixed Fractioned PCS Performed Better than NREL PCS 
     Raw corn stover was cut into 1 feet long sections based on height. 0-1 feet above ground was left unharvested in the field. Corn stover which stood 1-2, 2-3, 3-4, 4-5, 5-6, 6-7 feet above ground was denoted F2, F3, F4, F5, F6. Corn stover that was higher than 7 feet was labeled&gt;F7. Fractionated corn stover was ground with a Thomas Wiley mill (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, N.J., USA) to 2 mm, washed with tap water, and dried before pre-treatment. 
     F4, F5, F6, &gt;F7 were combined and pre-treated with dilute sulfuric acid (0.5% (w/w) solution) at a total solid (TS) of about 18% (w/w) in an Accelerated Solvent Extractor (ASE) (DIONEX, Sunnyvale, Calif., USA) at 170° C. for 15 minutes. F2 and F3 were mixed and pre-treated with NaOH under the following conditions: 11% (w/w) pre-treatment total solid (TS), 1% (w/w) NaOH solution, 90° C. for 60 minutes. After pre-treatment, alkaline PCS was squeezed to a total solid (TS) level of 39% to remove soluble lignin. Acid pre-treated F4, F5, F6, &gt;F7 were then mixed with squeezed alkaline pre-treated F2 and F3 until pH reached 5. 
     National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) whole corn stover was pre-treated with 1.1% (w/w) H 2 SO 4  solution, which was equivalent to 5% (w/w biomass) H 2 SO 4 , at 190° C. for 60 seconds. 
     Hydrolysis was conducted at 12.07% TS for mixed PCS which had a similar cellulose loading as 20% TS unwashed NREL PCS.  Trichoderma reesei  cellulase composition (CELLIC™ CTec2 available from Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) in the mixed PCS or NREL PCS was maintained at a ratio of  Trichoderma reesei  cellulase composition to cellulose of 2.82% (w/w). After 120 hours of hydrolysis, the hydrolysate was sampled, and analyzed by HPLC as mentioned in Example 1. 
     Compositions of the mixed PCS and NREL PCS were shown in Table 3. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Composition of PCS substrate (%) 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 fraction of 
                   
                   
                 Acid 
               
               
                   
                 insoluble 
                   
                   
                 insoluble 
               
               
                   
                 solids (FIS) 
                 glucan 
                 xylan 
                 lignin 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Mixed PCS 
                 83.47 
                 59.18 
                 22.07 
                 15.80 
               
               
                   
                 NREL PCS 
                 56.30 
                 52.93 
                 2.43 
                 31.77 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Hydrolysis of the mixed PCS is shown in Table 4. The results demonstrated that mixed PCS performed better than NREL PCS. The glucose conversion was calculated as mentioned in Example 1. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Comparison of glucose conversion of 
               
               
                 acid-alkaline mixed PCS and NREL PCS 
               
            
           
           
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Glucose conversion (%) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Mixed PCS 
                 65.59 
               
               
                   
                 NREL PCS 
                 49.61 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Example 3 
     Mixed PCS Performed Better than Corn Stover Pre-Treated Under Optimal Acid Pre-Treatment Conditions (Optimal Acidic PCS) 
     Screening of the optimal pre-treatment conditions for corn stover was conducted. It was identified that corn stover pre-treated with 0.5% (w/w) sulfuric acid at 170° C. for 15 minutes had the best glucose conversion using a  Trichoderma reesei  cellulase composition (CELLIC™ CTec2 available from Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark). To compare the hydrolysis of mixed PCS with that of corn stover pre-treated under optimal acid pre-treatment conditions, the following dilute acid pre-treatment was conducted. Hydrolysis of the PCS was evaluated. 
     Whole corn stover was ground with Thomas Wiley mill (Thomas Scientific, Swedesboro, N.J., USA) to 2 mm, washed with tap water, and dried before pre-treatment. 
     Ground corn stover was pre-treated with dilute sulfuric acid (0.5% (w/w) solution) at a total solid (TS) of about 18% (w/w) in an Accelerated Solvent Extractor (ASE) (DIONEX, Sunnyvale, Calif., USA) at 170° C. for 15 minutes. 
     Ground corn stover was pre-treated with dilute sulfuric acid (0.5% (w/w) solution) at a total solid (TS) of about 20% (w/w) in a sand bath reactor (Techne Inc. Burlington, N.J., USA) at 170° C. for 15 minutes. 
     Hydrolysis was conducted at 15% TS.  Trichoderma reesei  cellulase composition (CELLIC™ CTec2 available from Novozymes A/S, Bagsvaerd, Denmark) in mixed PCS or optimal acidic PCS was maintained at a ratio of  Trichoderma reesei  cellulase composition to cellulose of 2.82% (w/w) for ASE PCS or 4.24% (w/w) for sand bath PCS. After 120 hours hydrolysis, the hydrolysate was sampled, and analyzed by HPLC as mentioned in Example 1. 
     Result 
     The results showed that mixed PCS (see Example 2, glucose conversion of 65.59%) performed better than optimal acidic PCS. The glucose conversion was calculated as mentioned in Example 1. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 hydrolysis performance of optimal acidic PCS 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 optimal acidic PCS 
                 Glucose conversion (%) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 ASE acidic PCS 
                 59.92 
               
               
                   
                 Sand bath acidic PCS 
                 47.65