Patent Publication Number: US-11646186-B2

Title: System and method for optimizing peak shapes

Description:
TECHNICAL FIELD 
     The embodiments herein generally relate to a system for optimizing peak shapes for a spectrometer, and, more particularly, to a system and a method for automatically optimizing peak shapes for a spectrometer such as a mass spectrometer for estimating gas mixtures. 
     BACKGROUND ART 
     The standard mass spectrometer produces a signature appearing at multiple mass to charge ratios (m/z ratios) associated with its ions and their fragments. The mass spectrometer may ionize different gases at different relative rates. Ions of the different gases may be fragmented and may appear at various mass to charge ratios (i.e. m/zs). The fragmented ions at various mass to charge ratios are transmitted to a detector. The fragmentation of the ion may be constant for one gas. 
     Mass spectrometer data typically shows “peaks” corresponding to individual ions with different mass to charge (m/z) ratios. The fragmentation of the ions may be obtained from a standard reference database or by experiment. Each peak of the fragmented ions typically includes a non-zero width, and possibly asymmetric shape which depends on the mass to charge ratio. The peak of the fragmented ions is varied between different classes of mass spectrometer instruments as the peak of the fragmented ions is specified based on the mass spectrometer. A perfectly ideal mass spectrometer has peaks of zero width (impulses), while every actual mass spectrometer shows peaks of non-zero width, and shapes varying from neat Gaussian or Lorentzian curves to combinations of multiple peaks curves overlapping each other. 
     In conventional mass spectrometers, each mass spectrometer employs an estimation algorithm for adapting to the peak shapes produced by the mass spectrometers. These mass spectrometers need an algorithm tuning steps where the algorithms implemented in each mass spectrometer is tuned to the specific peak shapes that a mass spectrometer produces. One of the approaches for shaping the overlapping peaks involves de-convoluting the shape of the overlapping peaks using a de-convolution process. 
     However, the de-convolution process fails to extract information from the minor peaks that are hidden under larger adjacent peaks. Moreover, this approach is an instrument specific calibration with a limited set of scaling factors. Further the above said approach has limited estimation accuracy, variations from unit to unit and limited sensitivity at higher mass to charge ratios. Said approach has been also adapted to other spectroscopic type sensors such as a Raman spectrometer, an absorption spectrometer or a vibrational spectrometer. 
     Accordingly, there remains a need for a system and a method that automatically optimizes any peak shapes for a mass spectrometer and other spectroscopic type sensors for estimating gas and other mixtures by automatically optimizing parameters of the sensors. 
     SUMMARY OF INVENTION 
     One of aspect of this invention is a system for estimating compositions of a target mixture using a first type sensor. The first type sensor generates a scan output for the target mixture. The scan output including spectra of detected compositions as a function of a first variable such as mass-to-charge ratio, wave number and others. The system comprises a data base and a set of modules. The data base stores characterization data of known mixtures, a set of constraints that includes accuracy, sensitivity and resolution required for an application to that the system applies, and an analytical model of a standard mixture. The set of modules comprises a peak shape identification module, a synthetic data pre-generation module, a cost function defining module, an actual peak shape generation module, a calibration module and an estimation module. The peak shape identification module is configured to identify a best peak shape for estimation of the compositions of the known mixtures such as know gas mixtures by analyzing the characterization data across the known mixtures, with added noise as a background of the application, wherein the best peak shape is referred as a peak shape meets the set of constraints of the application best. The synthetic data pre-generation module is configured to pre-generate synthetic data with a desired peak shape that is corresponding to the best peak shape from the analytical model with the standard mixture as input. The desired peak shape may be a peak shape of a part of spectra that has the same range of the best peak shape. The cost function defining module is configured to define a cost function to determine a peak shape that is suitable for estimation of the compositions of the target mixture from the best peak shape. The actual peak shape generation module is configured to generate a plurality of actual peak shapes, in the first type of sensor, for several different instances using the standard mixture to provide that an actual peak shape among the plurality of actual peak shapes as a calibrating input to calibrate the first type of sensor. The calibration module is configured to calibrate the first type of sensor by automatically adjusting parameters of the first type of sensor to find selected parameters for optimizing the actual peak shape to match with the desired peak shape. The estimation module is configured to estimate the compositions of the target mixture using the cost function from a peak shape of a scan output of first type sensor generating with the selected parameters. 
     In this system, the estimation module can estimate the compositions of the target mixture using the cost function from a peak shape of a scan output calibrated by the standard mixture without using de-convoluting the shape of the peaks included in the scan output. 
     The set of modules may further include a parameters validation module that is configured to validate the selected parameters by generating a scan output of a known mixture to estimate accuracy and peak shape quality. The best peak shape identification module identifies the best peak shape with added noise using machine learning. 
     The first type of sensor may generate a scan output for a target gas mixture, the scan output comprising the spectra of detected ions as a function of the mass-to-charge ratio corresponding to the target gas mixture. The calibration module calibrates the first type of sensor by adjusting the parameter comprises at least one of a Radio Frequency voltage to Direct Current voltage ratio, an Emission Current, voltage gradients and a bias voltage. 
     The calibration modules may include: (a) an optimizing module that is configured to optimize the parameters for a mass to charge ratio of interest once the parameters to be adjusted are selected; and (b) a determining module that is configured to determine each of the selected parameters is in a predefined range by constraining (i) optimization of the actual peak shape and (ii) optimization of each of the selected parameters to respective predefined range. The first type of sensor may include a mass spectrometer including a quadrupole mass filter. The selected parameter may include the voltage gradients and individual bias voltage comprising (i) box bias, (ii) Filament bias, (iii) Lens bias, (iv) Exit lens bias and (v) quadrupole bias. 
     The system may further comprise a memory that stores the database and the set of modules, and a processor that executes the set of modules. The system may further comprise a first type of sensor. 
     Another aspect of this invention is a method implemented on a computer that includes estimating compositions of a target mixture using a first type sensor. The first type sensor generates a scan output for the target mixture and the scan output includes spectra of detected compositions as a function of a first variable. The estimating composition includes: (a) identifying a best peak shape for estimation of the compositions of known mixtures by analyzing characterization data across the known mixtures, with added noise as a background of an application, wherein the best peak shape is referred as for a given set of constraints that includes accuracy, sensitivity and resolution in the application, a peak shape meets the set of constraints best; (b) pre-generating synthetic data with a desired peak shape that is corresponding to the best peak shape from an analytical model with standard mixture as input; (c) defining a cost function to determine a peak shape that is suitable for estimation of the compositions of the target mixture from the best peak shape; (e) generating a plurality of actual peak shapes, in the first type of sensor, for several different instances using the standard mixture to provide that an actual peak shape among the plurality of actual peak shapes as a calibrating input to calibrate the first type of sensor; (f) calibrating the first type of sensor by automatically adjusting parameters of the first type of sensor to find selected parameters for optimizing the actual peak shape to match with the desired peak shape; and (g) generating a scan output of the target mixture of the first type sensor with the selected parameters to estimate the compositions of the target mixture using the cost function from a peak shape in the scan output. 
     The estimating composition may further include validating the selected parameters by generating a scan output of a known mixture to estimate accuracy and peak shape quality. The step of identifying the best peak shape may include identifying the best peak shape with added noise using machine learning. 
     The first type of sensor may generate a scan output for a target gas mixture. The scan output may include the spectra of detected ions as a function of the mass-to-charge ratio corresponding to the target gas mixture. The step of calibrating may include calibrating the first type of sensor by adjusting the parameter comprising at least one of a Radio Frequency voltage to Direct Current voltage ratio, an Emission Current, voltage gradients and a bias voltage. The step of calibrating may include: (a) optimizing the parameters for a mass to charge ratio of interest once the parameters to be adjusted are selected; and (b) determining each of the selected parameters is in a predefined range by constraining (i) optimization of the actual peak shape and (ii) optimization of each of the selected parameters to respective predefined range. 
     The first type of sensor may include a mass spectrometer including a quadrupole mass filter and the selected parameter may include the voltage gradients and individual bias voltage comprising (i) box bias, (ii) Filament bias, (iii) Lens bias, (iv) Exit lens bias and (v) quadrupole bias. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS 
       The embodiments herein will be better understood from the following detailed description with reference to the drawings, in which: 
         FIG.  1    illustrates a system for optimizing a peak shape for estimating a composition of a target gas mixture using an estimation system according to an embodiment herein; 
         FIG.  2    illustrates an exploded view of the estimation system of  FIG.  1    according to an embodiment herein; 
         FIG.  3    is a flow diagram that illustrates a calibration control loop for the estimation system of  FIG.  1    according to an embodiment herein; 
         FIG.  4 A  is a flow diagram that illustrates a method for optimizing a peak shape for estimating a composition of the target gas mixture using the estimation system of  FIG.  1    according to an embodiment herein; 
         FIG.  4 B  is a flow diagram following  FIG.  4 A ; 
         FIG.  5    illustrates a perspective view of a first type of sensor (a mass spectrometer) of  FIG.  1    according to an embodiment herein; and 
         FIG.  6    illustrates a schematic diagram of computer architecture of the estimation system in accordance with the embodiments herein. 
     
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS 
     The embodiments herein and the various features and advantageous details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the non-limiting embodiments that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description. Descriptions of well-known components and processing techniques are omitted so as to not unnecessarily obscure the embodiments herein. The examples used herein are intended merely to facilitate an understanding of ways in which the embodiments herein may be practiced and to further enable those of skill in the art to practice the embodiments herein. Accordingly, the examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments herein. 
     As mentioned, there remains a need for a system and a method that automatically optimizing peak shapes (i.e. Gaussian or Lorentzian curves or combinations of multiple peaks curves overlapping) for estimating a composition of a target mixture. The embodiments herein achieve this by providing an estimation system that generates an actual peak shape using standard mixtures to provide that actual peak shape as a calibrating input to calibrate the first type of sensor. Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to  FIGS.  1  through  6   , where similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the figures, preferred embodiments are shown. 
       FIG.  1    illustrates a system  110  for optimizing a peak shape for estimating a composition of a target gas mixture using an estimation system  106  according to an embodiment herein. The system  110  includes a source  102 , a first type of sensor  104  and the estimation system  106 . The source  102  includes a target gas mixture  102   a,  and a standard gas mixture or mixtures  102   b.  The source  102  may include one or more known gas mixtures  102   c  for validating the selected parameter for the first type of sensor  104 . The standard gas mixture  102   b  is one whose composition is known and is commonly available for an application to which the estimation system  106  applies. For example, the hydrocarbon industry uses a set of standard gas mixtures to evaluate the accuracy of sensors. 
     The estimation system  106  may be electrically connected to the first type of sensor  104 . In an embodiment, the first type of sensor  104  includes a mass spectrometer sensor and/or spectroscopic type sensors (e.g. a mass spectrometer, a Raman spectrometer, an absorption spectrometer or a vibrational spectrometer). In an embodiment, one example of the first type of sensor  104  is disclosed in the U.S. Pat. No. 9,666,422. The first type of sensor  104  generates a scan output for a set of gases in the target gas mixture. The scan output includes spectra of detected ions as a function of the mass-to-charge ratio (a first variable) corresponding to the target gas mixture. 
     The target mixture  102   a  and the standard mixture  102   b  may be liquid mixtures, mixed solutions, mixed solids and others. The first type of sensor  104  may be other type of sensor such as a Raman spectrometer that generates a scan output includes spectra of detected compositions as a function of the wave number that is the first variable. 
     The estimation system  106  identifies a best peak shape for estimation accuracy of known gas mixtures by analyzing characterization data across the known gas mixtures, with added noise, using machine learning techniques. The best peak shape is referred as, for a given set of accuracy, sensitivity (i.e. minimum incremental concentration detectable) and resolution (i.e. distinguishing between similar ions (similar compositions)) constraints in the application to which the system  106  applies, a peak shape that can meet the constraints best. In an embodiment, the best peak shape is determined from the characterization data. The identification of the best peak shape includes obtaining the best peak shape for the estimation accuracy from the scan output of the first type of sensor  104  for the known gas mixtures. The characterization data refers scan outputs of the first type of sensor  104  from the same known gas mixtures at various parameters settings of the first type of sensor  104 . In an embodiment, the parameter to an output shape relationship is varied from sensor to sensor. 
     The estimation system  106  pre-generates synthetic data with a desired peak shape from an analytical model with standard gas mixture  102   b  as input. The estimation system  106  further defines a cost function to determine a peak shape that is suitable for estimation of the target gas mixture  102   a  from the best peak shape. The estimation system  106  then generates a plurality of actual peak shapes in the first type of sensor  104  for several different instances using standard gas mixtures  102   b  to provide that an actual peak shape among the plurality of actual peak shapes as a calibrating input to calibrate the first type of sensor  104 . In an embodiment, for each instance, the actual peak shape is generated based on different parameters of the first type of sensor  104 . The estimation system  106  further calibrates the first type of sensor  104  by automatically adjusting the parameters of the first type of sensor  104  for optimizing the actual peak shape to match with the desired peak shape. In an embodiment, the parameter of the first type of sensor  104  includes at least one of a Radio Frequency voltage to Direct Current voltage ratio, Emission Current, voltage gradients and bias voltage. The voltage gradients and individual bias voltage parameter may include (i) box bias, (ii) Filament bias, (iii) Lens bias, (iv) Exit lens bias and (v) quadrupole bias. In an embodiment, the parameters of the first type sensor  104  are adjusted to effectively estimate desired peak shape of a particular gas in the target gas mixture. The estimation system  106  further validates the selected parameters including parameters that are specific to the mass to charge ratio of interest by generating a scan output of a known gas mixture  102   c  to estimate accuracy and peak shape quality. The estimation system  106  may be a computer, a mobile phone, a PDA (Personal Digital Assistant), a tablet, an electronic notebook or a Smartphone. In an embodiment, the first type of sensor  104  is embedded in the estimation system  106 . 
       FIG.  2    illustrates an exploded view of the estimation system  106  of  FIG.  1    according to an embodiment herein. The estimation system  106  includes a database  202 , a peak shape identification module  204 , a synthetic data pre-generation module  206 , a cost function defining module  208 , an actual peak shape generation module  210 , a calibration module  212 , a parameters validation module  218  and an estimation module  220 . The calibration module  212  includes a parameters optimization module  214  and a range determination module  216 . The database  202  stores the characterization data  202   a  of known gas mixtures, a set of constraints  202   b  required for the application to that the system  106  applies, and an analytical model  202   c  of the standard mixtures to generate synthetic data of peak shapes related to the standard gas mixtures  102   b.  The set of constraints  202   b  includes accuracy, sensitivity and resolution required for the application. 
     The peak shape identification module  204  identifies a best peak shape  204   a  for estimation of known gas mixtures by analyzing characterization data  202   a  across the known gas mixtures that are already analyzed by the first type of sensor  104 . The peak shape identification module  204  identifies the best peak shape  204   a  with added noise, using machine learning techniques. The noise to be added is usually a background of spectral component of the application such as a spectral of an air, a carrier gas and others, e.g. noise of circuitries and amplifiers. In the peak shape identification module  204 , the best peak shape  204   a  is referred as a peak shape meets the set of constraints  202   b  best. 
     The synthetic data pre-generation module  206  pre-generates synthetic data with a desired peak shape  206   a  from an analytical model  202   c  with the standard gas mixture  102   b  as input. The desired peak shape  206   a  corresponds to the part or the range of the best peak shape  204   a  in the spectral component of the pre-generated synthetic data of the standard gas mixture  102   b.  The cost function defining module  208  defines a cost function  208   a  to determine a peak shape that is suitable for estimation of the target gas mixture  102   a  from the best peak shape  204   a.  The actual peak shape generation module  210  generates a plurality of actual peak shapes, in the first type of sensor  104 , for several different instances using standard gas mixtures  102   b  to provide that an actual peak shape  210   a  among the plurality of actual peak shapes as a calibrating input to calibrate the first type of sensor  104 . 
     The calibration module  212  calibrates the first type of sensor  104  by automatically adjusting parameters of the first type of sensor  104  to find selected parameters  212   a  for optimizing the actual peak shape  210   a  to match with the desired peak shape  206   a.  In an embodiment, the parameters  212   a  to adjusted of the first type of sensor  104  includes at least one of a Radio Frequency voltage to Direct Current voltage ratio, Emission Current, voltage gradients and bias voltage. In another embodiment, the voltage gradients and individual bias voltage parameter includes (i) box bias, (ii) Filament bias, (iii) Lens bias, (iv) Exit lens bias and (v) quadrupole bias. The calibration module  212  includes a parameters optimization module  214  that optimizes the parameters for a mass to charge ratio of interest once the parameters  212   a  to be adjusted are selected. The calibration module  212  also includes a range determination module  216  that determines each of the selected parameters  212   a  is in a predefined range by constraining (i) optimization of the actual peak shape  210   a  and (ii) optimization of each of the selected parameters  212   a  to respective predefined range. The parameters optimization module  214  identifies the optimal parameters by the following equation.
 
 Xn+ 1= Xn−K·Jcf ( Xn ),
 
     Xn=nth set of parameters 
     K=constant 
     cf(X)=cost function 
     Jcf(X)=gradient vector of the cost function 
     The parameters optimization module  214  runs the gradient descent optimization over the selected parameters  212   a  to identify the optimal parameter. The parameters validation module  218  validates the selected parameters  212   a  including parameter that are specific to the mass to charge ratio of interest by generating a scan output of a known gas mixture  102   c  to estimate accuracy and peak shape quality. The estimation module  220  generates a scan output  220   a  of the target gas mixture  102   a  of the first type sensor  104  with the selected parameters  212   a  to estimate the compositions of the target gas mixture  102   a  using the cost function  208   a  from a peak shape in the scan output  220   a.    
       FIG.  3    is a flow diagram that illustrates a calibration control loop performed by the calibration module  212  for mass spectrometers that is the first type of sensor  104  of  FIG.  1    according to an embodiment herein. At step  302 , the calibration module  212  allows to select the parameters (i.e. the global parameters and local parameters) of the first type of sensor  104 . At step  304 , the calibration module  212  gathers desired peak shape data  206   a  and the actual peak shape data  210   a  for the given standard gas mixture  102   b  from the characterization data  202   a  across various known gas mixtures. At step  306 , the calibration module  212  runs gradient descent optimization over the selected parameters  212   a.  At step  308 , the calibration module  212  determines whether the actual peak shape  210   a  matches with the desired peak shape  206   a.  If not, the calibration module  212  adds the new parameter and calculates the gradient to determine if the actual peak shape  210   a  matches with the desired peak shape  206   a.  At step  310 , the parameters validation module  218  validates the selected parameters  212   a.    
       FIGS.  4 A- 4 B  are flow diagrams that illustrate a method for optimizing a peak shape for estimating a composition of a target gas mixture  102   a  using the estimation system  106  of  FIG.  1    according to an embodiment herein. At step  402 , by the estimation module  220 , a scan output  220   a  for the target gas mixture  102   a  is generated using the first type of sensor  104 . The scan output  220   a  includes spectra of detected ions as a function of the mass-to-charge ratio corresponding to the target gas mixture  102   a.  This step  402  is performed by using the selected parameters at step  412 , that is for generating the scan output  220   a  for the target mixture to estimate the compositions of the target gas mixture  102   a,  following steps are performed. 
     At step  404 , by the peak shape identification module  204 , a best peak shape  204   a  for estimation of known gas mixtures is identified by analyzing characterization data  202   a  across the known gas mixtures, with added noise, using machine learning techniques. At step  406 , by the synthetic data pre-generation module  206 , synthetic data with a desired peak shape  206   a  is pre-generated from an analytical model  202   c  with the standard gas mixture  102   b  as input. At step  408 , by the cost function defining module  208 , a cost function  208   a  is defined to determine a peak shape whether that is suitable for estimation of the target gas mixture  102   a  from the best peak shape  204   a.  At step  410 , by the actual peak shape generation module  210 , a plurality of actual peak shapes are generated for several different instances in the first type of sensor  104  using standard gas mixtures  102   b  to provide that an actual peak shape  210   a  among the plurality of actual peak shapes as a calibrating input to calibrate the first type of sensor  104 . 
     At step  412 , by the calibration module  212 , the first type of sensor  104  is calibrated by automatically adjusting parameters of the first type of sensor  104  to find selected parameters  212   a  for optimizing the actual peak shape  210   a  to match with the desired peak shape  206   a.  The parameter of the first type of sensor  104  to be adjusted includes at least one of a Radio Frequency voltage to Direct Current voltage ratio, Emission Current, voltage gradients and bias voltage. In an embodiment, the voltage gradients and individual bias voltage parameter includes (i) box bias, (ii) Filament bias, (iii) Lens bias, (iv) Exit lens bias and (v) quadrupole bias. In an embodiment, a stability of the system  106  is detected by determining whether the selected parameters  212   a  are within the allowable limits. The calibration  412  of the first type of sensor  104  may include steps of (a) optimizing the parameters for a mass to charge ratio of interest once the parameters to be adjusted are selected and (b) determining that each of the selected parameters is in a predefined range by constraining (i) optimization of the actual peak shape and (ii) optimization of each of the selected parameters to respective predefined range. At step  414 , by the parameters validation module  218 , the selected parameters  212   a  including parameters that are specific to the mass to charge ratio of interest are validated by generating a scan output of a known gas mixture  102   c  to estimate accuracy and peak shape quality. 
       FIG.  5    illustrates a perspective view of a first type of sensor  104  (a mass spectrometer) according to an embodiment herein. The first type of sensor  104  includes a target gas mixture  102   a,  an electron gun  504 , an electric magnet  506 , an ion beam  508  and an ion detector  510 . The target gas mixture  102   a  to be ionized is obtained from the source  102 . Also, the sample gas mixture  102   b  is obtained from the source  102  and ionized when the actual peak shape  210   a  is generated for calibration. The electron gun  504  ionizes particles in the target sample  102   a  by adding or removing electrons from the ionized particles. The electron gun  504  ionizes vaporized or gaseous particles using electron ionization process. The electric magnet  506  in the first type of sensor  104  produces electric or magnetic fields to measure the mass (i.e. weight) of charged particles. The magnetic field separates the ions according to their momentum (i.e. how the force exerted by the magnetic field can be used to separate ions according to their mass). One of examples of the magnetic fields to filter the ions is a quadruple magnetic field. The separated ion is targeted through a mass analyzer and onto the ion detector  510 . In an embodiment, differences in masses of the fragments allow the mass analyzer to sort the ions using their mass-to-charge ratio. The ion detector  510  measures a value of an indicator quantity and thus provides data for calculating the abundances of each ion present in the target sample  102   a.  The ion detector  510  records either the charge induced or the current produced when the ion passes by or hits a surface. In an embodiment, the mass spectrum is displayed in the estimation system  106 . 
     A representative hardware environment for practicing the embodiments herein is depicted in  FIG.  6   . This schematic drawing illustrates a hardware configuration of the estimation system  106  in accordance with the embodiments herein. The estimation system  106  comprises at least one processor or central processing unit (CPU)  10 . The CPUs  10  are interconnected via system bus  12  to various devices such as a random access memory (RAM)  14 , read-only memory (ROM)  16 , and an input/output (I/O) adapter  18 . The I/O adapter  18  can connect to peripheral devices, such as disk units  11  and tape drives  13 , or other program storage devices that are readable by the estimation system  106 . The first type of sensor  104  may connect with the system  106  via the I/O adapter  18 . The estimation system  106  can read the inventive instructions on the program storage devices and follow these instructions to execute the methodology of the embodiments herein. 
     The estimation system  106  further includes a user interface adapter  19  that connects a keyboard  15 , mouse  17 , speaker  24 , microphone  22 , and/or other user interface devices such as a touch screen device (not shown) or a remote control to the bus  12  to gather user input. Additionally, a communication adapter  20  connects the bus  12  to a data processing network  25 , and a display adapter  21  connects the bus  12  to a display device  23  which may be embodied as an output device such as a monitor, printer, or transmitter, for example. 
     The estimation system  106  is used to obtain better estimation accuracy from tall and thin peaks which are as close to Gaussian (normal) as possible. The estimation system  106  is used to minimize unit-to-unit (e.g. various mass spectrometers) variation. The estimation system  106  is used to tune the mass spectrometer  104  to various different applications (i.e. an ideal shape for each application is likely to be different and allow the mass spectrometer to be adapted). 
     One of the aspects of the above is a computer implemented system for optimizing a peak shape for estimating a composition of a target gas mixture, comprising: a first type of sensor  104  that generates a scan output for the target gas mixture, wherein the scan output comprises spectra of detected ions as a function of the mass-to-charge ratio corresponding to the target gas mixture; and an estimation system  106  that is connected to the first type of sensor  104  for estimating the composition of the target gas mixture. The estimation system comprises a memory that stores a database and a set of instructions, and a specialized processor that executes said set of instructions to (a) identify a best peak shape for estimation of known gas mixtures by analyzing characterization data across the known gas mixtures, with added noise, using machine learning, wherein said best peak shape is referred as, for a given set of accuracy, sensitivity and resolution constraints in an application, a peak shape meets the constraints best; (b) pre-generate synthetic data with a desired peak shape from an analytical model with standard gas mixture as input; (c) define a cost function to determine a peak shape that is suitable for estimation of the target gas mixture from the best peak shape; (d) generate a plurality of actual peak shapes, in the first type of sensor  104 , for several different instances using standard gas mixtures to provide that an actual peak shape among the plurality of actual peak shapes as a calibrating input to calibrate the first type of sensor  104 ; (e) calibrate the first type of sensor  104  by automatically adjusting parameters of the first type of sensor  104  for optimizing the actual peak shape to match with the desired peak shape, wherein the parameter of the first type of sensor  104  comprises at least one of a Radio Frequency voltage to Direct Current voltage ratio, Emission Current, voltage gradients and bias voltage; and (f) validate the selected parameters comprising parameters that are specific to the mass to charge ratio of interest by generating a scan output of a known gas mixture to estimate accuracy and peak shape quality. Said calibrate comprises optimizing the parameters for a mass to charge ratio of interest once the parameters to be adjusted are selected; and determining that each of the selected parameters is in a predefined range by constraining (i) optimization of the actual peak shape and (ii) optimization of each of the selected parameters to respective predefined range. 
     The first type of sensor  104  may include a mass spectrometer. The voltage gradients and individual bias voltage parameter may comprise (i) box bias, (ii) Filament bias, (iii) Lens bias, (iv) Exit lens bias and (v) quadrupole bias. 
     In another aspect of the above, a computer implemented method for optimizing a peak shape for estimating a composition of a target gas mixture is provided. The method comprising: (a) generating  402 , using a first type of sensor  104  a scan output for the target gas mixture, wherein the scan output comprises spectra of detected ions as a function of the mass-to-charge ratio corresponding to the target gas mixture; (b) identifying  404  a best peak shape for estimation of known gas mixtures by analyzing characterization data across the known gas mixtures, with added noise, using machine learning, wherein said best peak shape is referred as, for a given set of accuracy, sensitivity and resolution constraints in an application, a peak shape meets the constraints best; (c) pre-generating  406  synthetic data with a desired peak shape from an analytical model with standard gas mixture as input; (d) defining  408  a cost function to determine a peak shape that is suitable for estimation of the target gas mixture from the best peak shape; (e) generating  410  a plurality of actual peak shapes, in the first type of sensor  104 , for several different instances using standard gas mixtures to provide that an actual peak shape among the plurality of actual peak shapes as a calibrating input to calibrate the first type of sensor  104 ; (f) calibrating  412  the first type of sensor  104  by automatically adjusting parameters of the first type of sensor  104  for optimizing the actual peak shape to match with the desired peak shape; and (g) validating  414  the selected parameters comprising parameters that are specific to the mass to charge ratio of interest by generating a scan output of a known gas mixture to estimate accuracy and peak shape quality. The parameter of the first type of sensor  104  comprises at least one of a Radio Frequency voltage to Direct Current voltage ratio, Emission Current, voltage gradients and bias voltage. Said calibrating comprises optimizing the parameters for a mass to charge ratio of interest once the parameters to be adjusted are selected; and determining that each of the selected parameters is in a predefined range by constraining (i) optimization of the actual peak shape and (ii) optimization of each of the selected parameters to respective predefined range. 
     In the above computer implemented method, the first type of sensor  104  may include a mass spectrometer. In the above computer implemented method, the voltage gradients and individual bias voltage parameter may comprise (i) box bias, (ii) Filament bias, (iii) Lens bias, (iv) Exit lens bias and (v) quadrupole bias. The above computer implemented method may further include the step of detecting a stability of the system by determining whether the selected parameters are within the allowable limits. 
     The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the embodiments herein that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Therefore, while the embodiments herein have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments herein can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope.