Patent Publication Number: US-2010120970-A1

Title: Reversible micelles and applications for their use

Description:
The present invention relates to novel compositions for producing reversible micelles in solution and to applications for their use. 
     The controlled wetting of surfaces has many potential applications such as waterproofing of clothes and fabrics, concrete or paints, windows and windshields. In addition, controlled solid-liquid interfacial properties can have benefits in producing low friction surfaces for use in areas such as swimsuits, diving gear, boats and ships, as well as micro-fluidic devices. 
     Further applications in the area of “easy-to-clean” or “self-cleaning” surface coatings are also possible (1, 2). Such surfaces are usually designed to facilitate cleaning by minimising the adhesion of dirt and promoting water repellency such that as water “rolls off” the surface it collects the poorly adhered dirt particles (3). Often, “self-cleaning surfaces” such as are described as in WO 96/04123 are termed “Lotus-effect” surfaces or coatings, and the technology is termed “Lotus-Effect” technology. Such “self-cleaning surfaces” can be produced either by creating the surface structures directly from hydrophobic polymers during the manufacture, or creating the surface structures subsequently, and specifically either by subsequent imprinting or etching or by adhesion of a polymer made of the hydrophobic polymers. 
     A variety of methods for controlling the wetting of surfaces have been reported, (4,5) based both on the control of the surface chemistry as well as the surface morphology (6). More recently, combinations of these two approaches have been used (3, 7). It is known for example from basic surface wetting theory that a low energy surface (with a concomitant large contact angle, greater than 100°) will tend to repel water. The result will be the formation of drops that roll off the surface easily. 
     U.S. Patent Application Publication number 2002/0048679 (and related European Patent Application number EP 1018531) describe surfaces from which water runs off easily as having to be either very hydrophilic or hydrophobic. Hydrophilic surfaces have low contact angles with water, and this brings about rapid distribution of the water on the surface and finally rapid run-off of the resultant film of water from the surface. In contrast, hydrophobic surfaces form droplets through large contact angles with water. These droplets can roll off rapidly from inclined surfaces. 
     Many chemical materials are known to be capable of producing such water repellence; in general the materials possess a very low dielectric constant and are uncharged organics. Amongst these are materials such as halogenated organic polymers such as polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) and derivatives (8). One approach for manufacturing such surfaces is often to apply a thin layer of some new material with appropriate characteristics of for example appearance, durability, adhesion, and application requirements, directly onto the surface of interest. Such surface coatings should be easily and uniformly applied; established within a reasonable amount of time and process constraints; have a minimal environmental impact in their synthesis and application; resist the effects of environmental assault; and provide good economic value. 
     The main problems with such materials to date include; 
     (a) How to deposit the materials onto a surface of interest since the materials are often soluble in only a limited number of organic solvents? The result is for example spin casting methods, that usually require the liberal use of solvents with the associated cost and environment concerns. 
     (b) The durability of the coatings when applied and used in ‘the real world’. Damage of the coatings by abrasion and impact when in real world use can lead to a compromise in their efficiency. Re-coating can be difficult and expensive and will still have the same issues of environmental concern. 
     (c) Photodegradation effects caused by sunlight can also compromise the surface integrity and lead to re-application needs. 
     Random fluorinated copolymers prepared by radical copolymerisation of monomers in solution in a water-miscible organic solvent using peroxides or azo compounds as initiators have been described (see, for example, EP 542598, U.S. Pat. No. 1,106,630 and US 2004026053), together with their hydrophobic and oleophobic properties on various substrates. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 5,324,566 describes the use of hydrophobic fluorinated siloxane polymers for producing water repellent surfaces. It is disclosed in this patent that the water repelling properties of the fluorinated siloxane polymer surface film can be improved by forming surface irregularities on the surface and/or the surface film. In one form, the surface is provided with irregularities of a height from about 0.1 micrometers up to the wavelength of visible light. Likewise, U.S. Pat. No. 5,599,489 and EP 0 933 388 A2 describe how the structured surface includes fluorine containing polymers or has been treated using alkylfluorosilanes. 
     U.S. 2002/0048679 describes surfaces having a smooth, extremely hydrophobic polymer (for example, polytetrafluoroethylene) film and surfaces having a smooth extremely hydrophilic polymer film as examples of surfaces on which water and dirt can run off without forming droplets. U.S. 2002/0048679 further describes how a long-term hydrophobic coating may be formed by applying certain silane derivatives underneath a hydrophobic coating on a surface. Other self-cleaning surfaces are described in U.S. Patent Application numbers US 2002/0150723, US 2002/0150724, US 2002/0150725, US 2002/0150726, US 2003/0013795 and US 2003/0147932. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 3,354,022 discloses water repellent surfaces having a micro rough structure with elevations and depressions and a hydrophobic material based on a fluorine containing polymer. According to one embodiment, a surface with a self-cleaning effect can be applied to ceramic brick or glass by coating the substrate with a suspension comprising glass beads (diameter of 3 to 12 micrometres) and a fluorocarbon wax which is a fluoroalkyl ethoxymethacrylate polymer. Unfortunately, such coatings have a disadvantage in that they posses a low abrasion resistance and only a moderate self-cleaning effect. 
     Further developments of surface coatings that are designed to produce strongly hydrophobic surfaces include the use of copolymers, polymer blends and mixtures of polymers and nanoparticles (such as titanium dioxide, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,800,354, U.S. Pat. No. 7,112,621B2, U.S. Pat. No. 7,196,043 and DE 10016485.4). For example, coated surfaces have been produced using fluorocarbon polymers that can give contact angles of up to 120°. Titanium dioxide (TiO 2 ) has also been used in surface coatings; under UV irradiation the TiO 2  is photocatalytically active and can produce super-wetting effects as a result of water hydrolysis effects (9). Hence, if mixed with a very hydrophobic polymer, the wetting can be switched after activation using UV light. 
     The preparation of such surfaces using nanoparticles suffers from several key drawbacks including the use of organic solvents (U.S. Pat. No. 3,354,022) and the use of a subsequent heat treatment (U.S. Pat. No. 6,800,354). Thus there is a need for a simple process including an aqueous system for producing surfaces that are “easy-to-clean” or “self-cleaning” by water and transparent (such surfaces are not necessary hydrophobic, but can also be hydrophilic as illustrated in US 2002/0048679). 
     It has also been demonstrated recently that control over surface wetting can be improved by producing surfaces with a well-controlled micron-sized roughness (10). Such rough surface features assist in producing ‘ultrahydrophobic’ substrates by physical methods that include trapping air and reducing contact areas between the water drops and the surface. The basic underlying surface should itself be hydrophobic and when combined with the roughness effects this produces surfaces with contact angles greater than 150° which are extremely hydrophobic. However, such surfaces are difficult to manufacture, are usually very fragile and easily damaged and the micron-scale features can cause diffraction effects with light and will therefore be problematic for use in applications involving glass. 
     Despite these difficulties, products based upon these technologies (or derivatives thereof) are beginning to appear in the market place. This is especially true for self-cleaning glass surfaces where random roughness is used to overcome the diffraction problems. It is still unclear however, how effective these surfaces will be over time. 
     In addition to possessing an “easy-to-clean” or “self-cleaning” surface, it is often desirable for the surface to possess an aesthetically pleasing finish for example, spot-free or shiny that lasts for a reasonable period of time (for example between weeks and months). There are a number of waxes and other products currently in the market for attempting to give a spot-free finish. Typically, these products are designed to hydrophobically modify these surfaces so that that rain water and tap water will ‘bead up’ on such surfaces. Nonetheless, it is believed that the beading of water on such surfaces may actually increase the formation of water spots since the beads of water will leave deposits on the surface when they dry. Furthermore, products available on the market often require rinsing with water after use. Typically when the water dries from the surface water-marks, smears or spots are left behind. These water-marks, it is believed may be due to the evaporation of water from the surface leaving behind deposits of minerals which were present as dissolved solids in the water (for example calcium, magnesium, sodium ions and salts thereof) or may be deposits of water carried soils, or even remnants from a cleaning product (for example soap scum). This problem is often exacerbated by some cleaning compositions which modify the surface during the cleaning process in such a way that after rinsing, water forms discrete droplets or beads on the surface instead of draining off. These droplets or beads dry to leave consumer noticeable spots or marks known as water-marks. A means of solving this problem, known in the art is to dry the water from the surface using a cloth or chamois before the water-marks form. However this drying process (wiping washed and rinsed surfaces) is time consuming and requires considerable physical effort to the overall washing/cleaning process. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 5,759,980 (Blue Coral) describes a composition to eliminate the problem of water-marks on a car. The cleaning composition described therein comprises a surfactant package comprising a fluorosurfactant or a silicone surfactant and mixtures thereof; and a substantive polymer which is capable of bonding to a surface to make it hydrophilic. 
     DE-A-21 61 591 also describes a composition for cleaning cars wherein the surface is made hydrophilic by the application of amino-group containing copolymers such as polymeric ethyleneimines, polymeric dimethylaminoethylacrylate or methacrylate or mixed polymerisates. 
     However, it is believed that the polymers described in these two patents may tend to be removed from the surface during rinsing of the product from the surface. Hence the surface hydrophilicity is allegedly provided by the composition described. These compositions may be removed from the surface after the first rinse; consequently the alleged hydrophilicity is also removed. The benefit provided by these compositions is however lost when the surface is rinsed. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 6,846,512 B2 (Procter and Gamble) also describes a system and method for cleaning and/or treating a surface and in particular the exterior surface of a vehicle. However, the method requires the application of a non-photoactive nanoparticle coating composition to a surface. Such non photoactive nanoparticles can be inorganic nanoparticles (oxides, silicates, carbonates, hydroxides, layered clay minerals and inorganic metal oxides). 
     Thus there is a need for surfaces which have “easy-to-clean” or “self-cleaning” properties and which also prevent water-spotting from occurring, even if the rinsed surface is not physically wiped to remove residual water, that is a surface without the appearance of water-marks, even after the treated surface is later contacted with water. 
     Whilst most commercial surface coatings are produced by casting and or spin coating, using solutions of polymers in organic solvents, alternatives that are based on chemical grafting of polymer films have recently been discussed as possible alternatives. In this approach, coatings that consist of dense brush-like films of polymers chemically attached to a surface are produced. The attached polymers can have controlled chemistry that produces the desired wettability characteristics. Furthermore, the inherent chemical variety available to the synthetic polymer chemist means that such layers can be produced with a wide variety of physical properties, including the opportunity for including a stimulus responsive surface. 
     Stimuli-responsive polymers (11) are polymers that can respond to small changes in their environment with a large change in some physical property. Typical stimuli include: temperature, pH, ionic strength, light-, electric- and magnetic fields. Some polymers respond to a combination of two or more of these stimuli. For coatings, stimulus responsive polymers may have interest for a wide variety of possible uses where controlled changes in properties such as adhesion, lubrication, and wetting are required. 
     To manufacture such polymers, a controlled process is required in which a polymer or copolymer synthesis is used to achieve a product with properties such as a desired molecular weight and a narrow weight distribution or polydispersity. Polymers with a narrow molecular weight distribution can exhibit substantially different behaviour and properties to polymers prepared by conventional means. Living radical polymerizations (sometimes referred to as controlled free radical polymerizations) provide a maximum degree of control for the synthesis of polymers with predictable and well-defined structures. Recently, living radical polymerization has been shown to be viable technique to prepare a large diversity of block copolymers. 
     Recent advances in controlled/living radical polymerization (CLRP) techniques offer unprecedented opportunities for synthesis of such materials with precisely tailored nano- and micro-scale features. Atom transfer radical polymerization (ATRP), nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP), reversible addition fragmentation transfer polymerization (RAFT), are part of these recent techniques and even more recently, ‘activated regenerated by electron transfer’ (ARGET). These methods emerged during the mid-1990s, and have been lately extensively studied since they possess the unique advantage of combining the experimental simplicity of radical polymerization and the living character of anionic polymerization. CLRP techniques were evidenced to be unprecedented tools for macromolecular engineering (that is, for controlling the molecular structure of synthetic polymers), which allow the synthesis of a large variety of polymeric architectures such as block copolymers, graft copolymers, stars, star-blocks, miktoarm stars or macromolecular brushes. 
     The characteristics of a living polymerization include: polymerization proceeding until all monomer is consumed; number average molecular weight as a linear function of conversion; molecular weight control by the stoechiometry of the reaction; and block copolymer preparation by sequential monomer addition. 
     It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide novel compositions comprising variable wettable properties that can be deposited onto a surface without the need for organic solvents. 
     It is a further aim of the present invention is to provide a novel surface coating that promotes variable wettable properties on the surface or in other words provides an “easy-to-clean”surface meaning that an identifiable cleaning benefit (“easier-to-clean”, “cleaner-longer”, etc.) to a surface will be observed by the end-user. 
     Therefore, according to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a novel AB block copolymer comprising: 
     (i) a first hydrophobic block A, comprising a polymer selected from the group consisting of:
         a homopolymer of a fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate monomer A1;   a random, alternating, gradient or block copolymer, A1A2 comprising: a fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate monomer A1; and a non-fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate monomer A2;   a random, alternating, gradient or block copolymer, A1A2 comprising:   a fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate monomer A1 and a silyl acrylate or methacrylate monomer A3; and   a random, alternating, gradient or block copolymer, A1A2A3 comprising:   a silyl acrylate or methacrylate monomer A1, a fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate monomer A2 and a non-fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate monomer A3; and
 
(ii) a second hydrophilic block B comprising a non-fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate monomer.
       

     The ratio of the monomers making up each polymer of the block copolymer A-B is such that the volume fraction of the hydrophobic block A and hydrophilic block B agents leads to the formation of organised aggregates, such as micelles. Preferably, the ratio of the monomers comprising the block copolymer AB comprises: 
     10-80 units of A and 30 to 200 units of B, more preferably 20-40 units of A and 80 to 110 units of B. Most preferably the ratio of the monomers comprising the block copolymer AB comprises: 25 to 35 units of A and 85 to 100 units of B. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, block A comprises a random copolymer A1 A2 of a fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate monomer A1 and a non-fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate monomer A2 or a homopolymer of a fluorinated acrylate or methacrylate monomer A1. 
     Preferred fluorinated monomers A1 for block A have the general formula: 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     where R comprises hydrogen or an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, preferably methyl, and X comprises a fluorinated alkyl group, preferably comprising 1 to 6 carbon atoms, especially 1 to 4 carbon atoms. It is preferred however that R is hydrogen or methyl. 
     Preferably, the fluorinated monomer A1 is selected from the group consisting of trifluoroethyl methacrylate (TFEMA), trifluoroethyl acrylate (TFEA), pentafluoropropyl methacrylate (PFPMA), pentafluoropropyl acrylate (PFPA), heptafluorobutyl methacrylate (HFBMA) and heptafluorobutyl acrylate (HFBA). More preferably, the fluorinated monomer is TFEMA. 
     Preferred non-fluorinated acrylate monomers A2 for block A have the general formula: 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     where R comprises hydrogen or an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, preferably hydrogen or methyl. It is preferred that Y comprises an alkylaminoalkyl group, more preferably an alkylaminoethyl group and especially a diethylaminoethyl group. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, block A (A1×A2y) comprises a random copolymer of a fluorinated acrylate monomer A1 and a non-fluorinated acrylate monomer A2, preferably where the repeating number of units of the fluorinated monomer A1 is x where x is the range of 0-80 and the repeating number of units of the non-fluorinated monomer is y where y is in the range 0 to (80-x). 
     More preferably, block A comprises a random copolymer of the repeating units trifluoroethylmethacrylate and diethylaminoethyl methacrylate, preferably in the following numbers: 
     P(TFEMA x -r-DEAEMA y ) where x=0 to 30′ and y=0 to (30-x). 
     Preferred silyl acrylate monomers A3 for block A have the general formula: 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     wherein R comprises hydrogen or an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbons, preferably methyl, and Z comprises a silyl alkyl group, the alkyl group having 1 to 10, preferably 1 to 4 carbon atoms. 
     Preferably, the silyl group is a trialkoxysilyl group, more preferably, a trimethoxysilyl group. Preferred silyl monomers for block A are (trimethoxysilyl)propyl methacrylate (TMSPMA) and (trimethoxysilyl)propyl acrylate (TMSPA). 
     The second block B is preferably water soluble and has the preferred general formula: 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     where R is hydrogen or an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, preferably methyl and R1 is hydrogen, an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, preferably methyl or an aminofunctional group, preferably being an alkylaminoalkyl group. 
     Other suitable hydrophilic block B is quaternized dialkylaminoalkyl acrylate or methacrylate monomers having the following formula: 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     wherein R is hydrogen or an alkyl group having 1 to 4 carbon atoms, preferably methyl; z denotes 0 or 1; R2 is CH 2 —CHOH—CH 2  or C x H 2x , in which x is 2 to 18, preferably x is 2; R3 represents a lower alkyl group from 1 to 4 carbon atoms, preferably methyl, ethyl. R4 denotes a lower alkyl group from 1 to 4 carbon atoms; preferably methyl, ethyl. 
     X −  is chosen from the group of Cl, Br, I, ½SO 4 , HSO 4  and CH 3 SO 3 . 
     More preferably, the second block B comprises the monomers selected from the group consisting of 2-(dimethyl amino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), 2-(diethyl amino)ethyl methacrylate (DEAEMA), 2-(diisopropyl amino)ethyl methacrylate (DPAEMA), 2-(N-morpholino)ethyl methacrylate (MEMA), or a derivative thereof, methacrylic acid (MAA) or derivative thereof and acrylic acid or a derivative thereof. Most preferably the second block comprises monomers selected from DMAEMA or MAA. 
     In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, novel copolymers comprise P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-DMAEMA] and P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-MAA] in the proportions defined above. 
     Preferably, the block copolymers according to the first aspect of the present invention are prepared by means of controlled living radical polymerisation to obtain narrow molecular weight distribution copolymers. Suitable synthetic routes include but are not limited to: Reversible Addition—fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT), Group transfer polymerisation (GTP) and Atomic transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP), Activated regenerated by electron transfer (ARGET), nitroxide-mediated polymerization (NMP). 
     The copolymers according to the present invention have been found to form reversible micelles in aqueous solution. 
     The block copolymers of the present invention may be available in solid or substantially solid form as for example a powder or alternatively may be available as a compostion. 
     Therefore according to a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a composition comprising: 
     (a) a block copolymer according to a first aspect of the present invention and 
     (b) a liquid medium comprising (I) or (ii); wherein 
     (i) comprises a mixture of water and an organic solvent; and 
     (ii) comprises an organic solvent substantially free from water. 
     In the composition according to the second aspect of the present invention the liquid medium preferably comprises a mixture of water and an organic solvent, or an organic solvent free from water, the block copolymer is preferably completely dissolved in the liquid medium. 
     Organic solvents suitable for use in the composition of the present invention preferably comprise water-miscible organic solvents selected from: C 1-6  alcohol, preferably, methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, iso-propanol, n-butanol, and sec-butanol; linear amides; ketones and ketone-alcohols, preferably acetone, methyl ethyl ketone; water miscible ethers; diols, preferably diols having 2 to 12 carbon atoms for example acetone or ethylene glycol. 
     Organic solvents substantially free from water the organic solvents for use in the composition of the present invention preferably comprise organic solvents selected from the group comprising: tetrahydrofuran, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, chloroform, lower alcohols, ketones or dimethyl sulphoxide 
     In addition, when the liquid medium comprises an organic solvent substantially free from water the composition preferably further comprises a suitable polar solvent. 
     Furthermore, it will be appreciated by one skilled in the art that in the composition of the present invention the organic solvent free from water may comprises a single organic solvent or a mixture of two or more organic solvents. 
     The relative proportions of components (a) and component (b) in the composition of the present invention preferably comprises between 100:1 to 1:100, more preferably from 10:1 to 1 to 10, and especially from 2:1 to 1:2. 
     Most preferably the relative proportions of component (a) and component (b) in the composition comprises 1:1. 
     It will also be appreciated that the composition according to the second aspect of the present invention may preferably further comprise additional components selected from for example but not limited to dispersants, perfumes, biocides, colourants and stabilisers. 
     The compositions of the present invention have many potential uses. The compositions are pH-responsive and accordingly have potential for a wide variety of possible uses where controlled changes in surface properties, such as adhesion, lubrication and wetting are required. 
     The novel compositions according to the present invention are particularly suitable for use in the coating of a surface to form an “easy-to-clean” surface/a “self-cleaning” surface. To this end, a third aspect of the present invention provides a surface coating comprising a block copolymer according to the first aspect of the present invention or a composition according to a second aspect of the present invention. 
     A fourth aspect of the present invention provides a method of coating a substrate comprising the steps of: 
     preparing a solution, preferably an aqueous solution of a copolymer according to a first aspect or second aspect of the present invention in for example an aqueous solution and exposing the substrate to the aqueous solution. 
     Preferably, the method includes gentle agitation of the copolymer molecules to fully dissolve the molecules in solution. Preferably, the solution is left to equilibrate for up to 24 hours, prior to application. 
     Methods of exposing the substrate to the solution include any known technique for forming a coating from a solution, such as spin coating, dip coating, roller coating, brush coating, curtain flow or spraying. 
     Surfaces that can be treated with the coatings of the present invention include, but are not limited to, glass, plastics, metals, ceramics, concrete, paper, wood, minerals, painted and/or coated substrates. Optionally, the substrate may be rinsed with a pure solvent, such as water, to remove any loosely held copolymer molecules. 
     It is an advantage of the present invention to provide a process and a composition for producing surfaces that are “easy-to-clean”/“self-cleaning” by water:
         wherein the composition is a stable aqueous-based system,   wherein a consumer may apply a coating with identifiable cleaning benefit (“easier-to-clean”, “cleaner-longer”, etc.) to a surface,   wherein a spot-free finish will be observed on the treated surface (surface without the appearance of water-marks, even after the treated is later contacted with water),   wherein a transparent coating without significant loss of gloss is formed by the process and composition.       

     The block copolymers according to the first aspect of the present invention may also be used as uptake-release materials due to their open-close character and enhanced solubilisation capacity. 
     Accordingly, a fifth aspect of the present invention provides a substance-delivery carrier comprising a block copolymer according to the first aspect of the present invention or a composition according to the second aspect of the present invention in combination with a substance to be delivered to a site, such as for example organic actives, for example but not limited to medicaments. 
     A sixth aspect of the present invention provides an uptake/release method for a substance comprising the steps of mixing an aqueous solution of the substance with a copolymer according to the first or second aspects of the present invention, coating a substrate with the aqueous solution and rinsing the coated substrate with a buffer solution at a reduced pH to release the substance. 
     Preferably, the buffer solution has a pH of less than 5, preferably being 4. 
     The present invention will now be illustrated by reference to the following examples in which: 
     Example 1—describes the preparation of a TFEMA homopolymer, a DEAEMA homopolymer, a poly[TFEMA-r-DEAMA] copolymer and poly [TFEMA-r-DEAMA)-block-DMAEMA] copolymer by RAFT, ATRP and GTP process;
 
Example 2—investigates the coating of a substrate with the block copolymer of Example 1;
 
Example 3—investigates the “easy-to-clean” properties of a substrate coated with the block copolymer of Example 1; and
 
Examples 4 and 5—investigate the use of the block copolymer of Example 1 as responsive uptake/release materials.
 
    
    
     
       The present invention will now also be described and illustrated further with reference to the accompanying drawings in which: 
       FIG.  1 —is graph to demonstrate PTFEMA and PDEAEMA polymerization kinetics, polymerised at 80° C. in toluene (25%) in mass, [monomer]/[CPDB]/[AIBN]:30/1/0.4. 
       FIG.  2 —is a graph of evolution number average molar masses (Mn) versus conversion obtained by size exclusion chromatography with THF as eluent for 2-cyanoprop-2-yl dithiobenzoate mediated RAFT polymerization of TFEMA and DEAEMA at 80° C. in toluene (25% in mass), [monome]/[CPDB]/[AIBN]: 30/1/0.4. 
       FIG.  3 —is a graph of polydispersity indices versus conversion for 2-cyanoprop-2-yl dithiobenzoate mediated RAFT polymerization of TFEMA and DEAEMA at 80° C. in toluene (25% in mass), [monomer]/[CPDB]/[AIBN]:30/1/0.4. SEC measurements using PMMA standard and THF as eluent. 
       FIG.  4 —is an example of evolution of size exclusion chromatograms with time for 2-cyanoprop-2-yl dithiobenzoate mediated RAFT polymerization of TFEMA and DEAEMA at 80° C. in toluene (25% in mass), [monomer]/[CPDB]/[AIBN]: 30/1/0.4. SEC measurements using PMMA standards and THF as eluent. 
       FIG.  5 —is a SEC chromatogram of several poly [TFEMA-random-DEAEMA] copolymers for 2-cyanoprop-2-yl dithiobenzoate mediated RAFT random copolymerization at 80° C. in toluene. SEC measurements using PMMA standards and THF as eluent. 
       FIG.  6 —is a SEC chromatogram of P(TFEMA 9 -r-DEAEMA 19 ) copolymer used as macroRAFT agent and P[(TFEMA 9 -r-DEAEMA 19 )-b-DMAEMA 90 ]. 
       FIG.  7 —is a 1 μm×1 μm in-situ AFM image of adsorbed copolymer micelles at the mica-water interface. Copolymer sample was P[(TFEMA 5 -r-DEAMEA 25 )-b-DMAEMA 89 ] at 500 ppm concentration. Background electrolyte is 0.01 M KNO 3  and solution pH=9. 
       FIG.  8 —is a 1 μm×1 μm in situ AFM image of adsorbed copolymer micelles at the mica-water interface. The copolymer sample was P[(TFEMA 5 -r-DEAEMA 25 )-b-DMAEMA 89 ] at 500 ppm concentration. The background electrolytes is, 0.01M KNO 3  and solution pH=4. 
       FIG.  9 —is a graph illustrating optical reflectometry data of the relative adsorbed mass as a function of time. The data relates to the adsorption of p[(TFEMA 14 -r-DEAEMA 14 )-b-DMAEMA 90 ] at the silica water interface. The concentration of copolymer is 500 ppm. The background electrolyte is 0.025M borax and solution pH=9. 
       FIG.  10 —is in situ AFM images of the surface adsorbed layer formed at the mica-water interface of P[(TFEMA 9 -r-DEAEMA 19 )-b-DMAEMA 90 ] copolymer sample. The background electrolyte is 0.01M KNO 3 . The data is for a pH9-pH4-pH9 rinse cycle. 
       FIG.  11 —is a graph illustrating force curve data collected at the mica-water interface. 
       FIG.  12 —is Zeta sizer data for various copolymer samples where () is P(DEAEMA 30 -b-DMAEMA 95 ), (▪) is P[(TFEMA 5 -r-DEAEMA 25 )-b-DMAEMA 89 ]; (▴) is P[(TFEMA 9 -r-DEAEMA 19 )-b-DMAEMA 90 ]. The concentration of copolymer is 500 ppm. The background electrolyte is 0.01 M KNO 3 . The was data collected using static light scattering. 
       FIGS.  13 A to  13 E—are images of water droplets at an uncoated solid surface and coated solid surface provided with different copolymer samples. 
       FIG.  14 —illustrates the roughness of the surface adsorbed layer formed at the mica-water interface of P[(TFEMA 23 -r-DEAEMA 11 )-b-DMAEMA 94 ] copolymer sample. 
       FIG.  15 —illustrates s a bar chart showing a comparison of the percentage of soiling removed after rinsing a coated and an uncoated surface. 
       FIG.  16 —illustrates a comparison of the total colour difference ΔE, of soiled panels, panels after rinsing (10 ml water) and panels after a second rinse (100 ml water); 
       FIG.  17 —is the relative adsorbed mass of the polymer layer onto a silica-crystal. The data was obtained by Quartz Crystal Microbalance at different pH. 
       FIGS.  18 A to  18 D—illustrates the “easy-to-clean” properties of a substrate applied with a coating according to the present invention.  FIG. 18A  illustrates the substrate after application of dirt solution,  FIG. 18B  illustrates the substrate after one week,  FIG. 18C  illustrates the substrate after 3 months and  FIG. 18D  illustrates the substrate after 14 months in outside conditions in a natural environment. 
       FIGS.  19 A and  19 B—illustrate the “spot-free finish” properties of a substrate applied with a coating according to the present invention. 
       FIG.  20 —is a photographic image of (A) uncoated silica particles, (B) silica particles coated with micelle-copolymer according to the present invention preloaded with Orange OT dye and (C) silica particles after rinsing at pH 4. 
       FIG.  21 —is a photographic image of (A) uncoated silica particles, (B) silica particles coated with micelle-copolymer according to the present invention preloaded with chrysoidine dye, (C) silica particles after 30 minutes rinsing at pH 4 and (D) silica particles after 3 hours rinsing at pH 4. 
     
    
    
     Most existing approaches to produce surfaces with controlled and/or variable wetting require either complex micro-machining of surfaces or complex and expensive chemical methods, often with inherent environmental concerns related to the use of organic solvents. The compositions of the present invention produce surfaces with inherent micro(nano)-scale structure (with the possible wetting benefits that infers) that are also stimulus responsive and have associated ‘tunable’ properties using a simple aqueous based self-assembly route having minimal processing requirements. The surface coatings form spontaneously when a water-based solution of the polymers is applied to the surface of interest, thus removing the need for organic solvents for their deposition on the surface. The surface coatings also provide a higher contact angle than an uncoated substrate that tends to repel water and provide a better washing off of the substrate. 
     In particular, the present invention, provides a new family of pH-responsive AB block copolymers wherein the first block A is a random copolymer of a non-fluorinated acrylate monomer and fluorinated acrylate monomer or a homopolymer of a fluorinated acrylate monomer. The second block B is water-soluble and comprises an acrylate or acrylic acid derivative monomer. These novel copolymers have been found to provide superior variable wettable surfaces when applied to a substrate that could not be predicted from the prior art. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     Preparation of Polymers and Block Copolymers According to the Invention 
     The new AB block copolymers according to the present invention were prepared from 2-(dimethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DMAEMA), 2-(diethylamino)ethyl methacrylate (DEAEMA) mixed with a fluorinated monomer:trifluoroethylmethacrylate (TFEMA): poly(TFEMA)-random-poly(DEAEMA)-block-poly(DMAEMA) were produced by Reversible Addition-Fragmentation Chain Transfer (RAFT) polymerization which is a controlled/living polymerization that can synthesize well-defined homopolymers and block copolymers using the RAFT agent, 2-cyanoisopropyl dithiobenzoate (CPDB). 
     Since the kinetics of each monomer is unique, knowledge of polymerization kinetics of PTFEMA and PDEAEMA facilitates the synthesis of polymers with desirable characteristics. The synthesis of diblock copolymers of poly(TFEMA)-random-poly(DEAEMA) copolymers, and copolymers poly(TFEMA)-random-poly(DEAEMA)-block-poly(DMAEMA) is also demonstrated for the first time. 
     Whilst the current example prepares the block copolymer using the RAFT agent, CPDB, it is to be appreciated that other RAFT agents may be used. Similarly, the block copolymers may be prepared by means of other controlled living polymerisation techniques, such as group transfer polymerisation (GTP), atomic transfer radical polymerisation (ATRP) and Activated regenerated by electron transfer (ARGET) or Activated generated by electron transfer (AGET). 
     RAFT Synthesis of TFEMA Homopolymer. 
     The following conditions were used for the synthesis of PTFEMA with a targeted polymerization degree of 30. TFEMA (2.53 g, 15.05 mmol), CPDB (0.119 g, 0.537 mmol), AIBN (34 mg, 0.207 mmol) and toluene (solvent, 0.675 g, 25% in mass) were introduced into a schlenk tube containing a magnetic stirrer. The mixture was separated into several samples. All of the samples were degassed by nitrogen bubbling and heated at 80° C. in a thermostated oil bath under nitrogen atmosphere. After x hours of polymerization, the vial was immersed into ice to stop the polymerisation (refer to  FIG. 1  for value of “x”, corresponding to the reaction time). The conversion was determined by  1 H NMR spectroscopy at 400 MHz, integrating one vinylic proton (6.11 ppm) in comparison with triplet peak (at 4.2 ppm, from the monomer CH 2 )+large peak (at 4.1 ppm, from CH 2  polymer). The molar masses and polydispersity indices were determined by SEC using PMMA standard calibration and THF as eluent, (see  FIGS. 2  and 3). The experimental molar masses were compared to theoretical values calculated according to the following equation (1): 
     
       
         
           
             
               
                 
                   
                     Mn 
                     
                       th 
                       , 
                       NMR 
                     
                   
                   = 
                   
                     
                       M 
                       CPDB 
                     
                     + 
                     
                       
                         M 
                         TFEMA 
                       
                       × 
                       
                         
                           
                             
                               [ 
                               TFEMA 
                               ] 
                             
                             0 
                           
                           × 
                           
                             C 
                             TFEMA 
                           
                         
                         
                           
                             [ 
                             CPDB 
                             ] 
                           
                           0 
                         
                       
                     
                   
                 
               
               
                 
                   ( 
                   1 
                   ) 
                 
               
             
           
         
       
     
     where: 
     M CPDB  and M TFEMA  are the molar masses of CPDB and TFEMA, respectively [CPDB] 0  and [TFEMA] 0 , the initial concentration of CPDB and TFEMA and C TFEMA , the fraction conversion. The contribution of the molar mass of the chains initiated by AIBN was neglected. 
     RAFT Synthesis of DEAEMA Homopolymer. 
     A procedure similar to PTFEMA polymerization was used for PDEAEMA synthesis. DEAEMA (2.78 g, 15.05 mmol), CPDB (0.113 g, 0.51 mmol), AIBN (34 mg, 0.207 mmol) and toluene (solvent, 0.73 g, 25% in mass) were mixed together. After degassing by nitrogen bubbling, polymerization was conducted under nitrogen at 80° C.  FIG. 1  of the accompanying drawings illustrates the RAFT polymerization kinetics for TFEMA and DEAEMA homopolymerization. The resultant samples were analysed by SEC and NMR spectroscopy (see  FIGS. 2 and 3 ). 
     RAFT Synthesis of Poly[TFEMA-random-DEAEMA] Copolymer: P(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA). 
     A series of poly[TFEMA x -random-DEAEMA y ] copolymers were prepared by RAFT polymerization using CPDB as chain transfer agent and AIBN as initiator, as shown in Table 1 below. For the ratio [CPDB]/[AIBN]: 1/0.4, several ratio of monomers were used: [TFEMA]=x=0 to 30 and [DEAEMA]=y=30-x. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Reaction conditions used for RAFT random copolymerisation of 
               
               
                 TFEMA and DEAEMA at 80° C. over 3 hours under nitrogen. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Monomer 1 
                 Monomer 2 
                 RAFT agent 
                 Initiator 
                 Solvent 
               
               
                   
                 DEAEMA 
                 TFEMA 
                 CPDB 
                 AIBN 
                 Toluen 
               
               
                 Trial 
                 (mmol) 
                 (mmol) 
                 (mmol) 
                 (mmol) 
                 (mmol) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 1 
                 29.994 
                 — 
                 1.007 
                 0.402 
                 15.954 
               
               
                 2 
                 25.072 
                 5.014 
                 1.003 
                 0.396 
                 15.628 
               
               
                 3 
                 20.041 
                 10.011 
                 1.039 
                 0.414 
                 15.346 
               
               
                 4 
                 14.989 
                 14.995 
                 1.007 
                 0.414 
                 15.422 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Polymerizations were carried out at 80° C. in toluene (25% in mass) over 3 hours. Samples were withdrawn after 3 hours and the obtained polymers were analysed by SEC in THF and NMR, see  FIG. 4 . 
     The formula of P(TFEMA x -r-DEAEMA y ) copolymer with x=0 to 30 and y=30-x is shown below. 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     Table 2 below illustrates the characterization results of Poly[TFEMA-random-DEAEMA] copolymers. 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
            
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Ratio 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 M1/M2 
                   
                   
                 Mn 
                 Mn 
               
               
                   
                 determined by 
                   
                 Mn 
                 calculated 
                 calculated 
               
               
                   
                 NMR 
                 Conversion (%) 
                 theory 
                 NMR 
                 SEC 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Trial 
                 DEAEMA 
                 TFEMA 
                 DEAEMA 
                 TFEMA 
                 (g/mol) 
                 (g/mol) 
                 (g/mol) 
                 PDI 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 1 
                 29 
                 — 
                 97.6 
                 — 
                 5600 
                 5600 
                 5990 
                 1.16 
               
               
                 2 
                 25 
                 5 
                 97.54 
                 97.45 
                 5560 
                 5700 
                 6600 
                 1.14 
               
               
                 3 
                 19 
                 9 
                 95.8 
                 96.6 
                 5210 
                 5250 
                 6710 
                 1.17 
               
               
                 4 
                 14 
                 14 
                 96.22 
                 96.23 
                 5280 
                 5170 
                 7190 
                 1.13 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     RAFT Synthesis of Poly[(TFEMA-random-DEAEMA)-block-DMAEMA] Copolymer: P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-DMAEMA]. 
     For the synthesis of the diblock P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-DMAEMA] copolymers, RAFT synthesized P(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA) was used as macroRAFT agent. Chain extension experiments were carried out to obtiain P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-DMAEMA] copolymers. This allowed appreciation of the degree of ‘livingness’ of P(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA) chains obtained by CPDB-mediated RAFT polymerization. 
     The formula of P[(TFEMAx-r-DEAEMAy)-b-DMAEMAz] copolymer with x=0 to 30; y=30-x; z=90 is as follows: 
     
       
         
         
             
             
         
       
     
     Typically, the general conditions for polymerization is 80° C. in toluene (25% in mass), using the following ratios: [DMAEMA]/[macro RAFT agent]/[AIBN]: 100/1/0.4. Samples were withdraw after 3 hours (conversion of DMAEMA of 90%), and the obtained polymers were analysed by SEC in THF and NMR (see  FIG. 5 ). The observed shift of the chromatogram is consistent with an extension of chains. 
     ATRP Synthesis of Poly[TFEMA-random-DEAEMA]-Cl Copolymer: P(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-Cl as macroinitiator. 
     All monomers of DEAEMA, TFEMA and DMAEMA were purified by passing through an alumina column prior to use in order to remove inhibitor. 
     To a dry 25-mL Schlenk flask with a magnetic stirring bar, copper chloride, CuCl (0.0336 g, 0.3 mmol) was added, and the Schlenk flask was evacuated and flushed with nitrogen. DEAEMA (0.77 g, 4.26 mmol), TFEMA (3.46 g, 20.6 mmol), 1,1,4,7,10,10-hexamethyl-triethylenetetramine (HMTETA) (0.088 g, 0.4 mmol), and degassed methanol (2.5 mL) and distilled water (0.5 mL) were added to the Schlenk flask using degassed syringes. The mixture was stirred for 10 minutes. The flask was then placed in a water bath maintained at 25±0.2° C. Finally, p-Toluenesulfonyl chloride (p-TsCl) (0.0636 g, 0.3 mmol) was added. The reaction was allowed to proceed with constant stirring for 3 hours. The polymerization was terminated by exposing the reaction vessel to air, and cooling down in a ice bath. Then 10 ml of CH 2 Cl 2  was added. The solution was passed through a basic alumina column and eluted with additional 100 ml of CH 2 Cl 2 . After being concentrated in a rotary evaporator, the solution was poured into cold hexane to precipitate the polymer. The recovered polymer was dried in a vacuum oven overnight at 40° C. The polymer P(TFEMA 24 -r-DEAEMA 5 )-Cl was obtained and characterized by NMR and SEC. 
     ATRP Synthesis of Poly[(TFEMA-random-DEAEMA)-block-DMAEMA] Copolymer: P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-DMAEMA]. 
     P(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-Cl was synthesized using the p-TsCl/CuCl initiator system as previously described. A representative experimental procedure for the synthesis of the block copolymer P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-DMAEMA] is described as follows: 
     To a 25-ml Schlenk flask equipped with a magnetic stirring bar, P(TFEMA 24 -r-DEAEMA 5 )-Cl (Mn,SEC=9200; Mw/Mn=1.09) (0.36 g) and CuCl (0.007 g, 0.07 mmol) were added. DMAEMA (1.38 g, 8.79 mmol) and degassed methanol/water mixed solvent (methanol 4.0 ml, water 0.4 ml) were then added via nitrogen-purged syringes. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 10 minutes, after which it was degassed by flushing nitrogen. Finally, HMTETA (0.019 ml, 0.08 mmol) was added via an nitrogen-purged syringe. The flask was then placed in a water bath maintained at 25° C., and the reaction time was 3 hours. After precipitation in a cold hexane, the recovered polymer P(TFEMA 24 -r-DEAEMA 5 )-b-DMAEMA 30  was dried in a vacuum oven overnight at 40° C. and analyzed by NMR and SEC. 
     GTP Synthesis of Poly[(TFEMA-random-DEAEMA)-Block-DMAEMA] Copolymer: P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-DMAEMA] 
     To synthetize the polymer by GTP, it is first necessary to prepare a catalyst such as tetra-n-butyl ammonium bibenzoate (TBABB) by the method of Dicker et al described in the literature [Dicker 1B, Cohen G M, Farnham W B, Hertler W R, Laganis E D, Sogah D Y, Macromolecules, 23, 4034-4041 (1990)] and incorporated herein by reference. The catalyst TBABB (23.6 mg, 0.065 mmol) was added from a side arm under a nitrogen purge in a 250 ml three-necked round bottom flask. Anhydrous tetrahydrofuran (100 ml) was then transferred into the flask via cannula before the addition of 1-methoxy-1-trimethylsiloxy-2-methyl-1-propane (MTS, 0.6 ml, 2.96 mmol). This solution was stirred for 20 minutes and then monomer DMAEMA (15.68, 99 mmol) was added dropwise via cannula. In the meantime, a thermometer was fitted to the side of the reaction vessel to monitor the exotherm during the addition of monomer. It was observed that the reaction temperature increased by 7 to 18° C. The reaction mixture was stirred until the solution temperature returned to room temperature (approximately 60 minutes). Then an aliquot of the reaction mixture was extracted via syringe for NMR and SEC analyses. Subsequently, a mixture of monomers TFEMA (2.51 g, 14.9 mmol) and DEAEMA (2.77 g, 14.9 mmol) was added dropwise via a cannula and a second exotherm was recorded. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature until the exotherm abated (approximately 60 minutes). After a further aliquot was extracted for NMR and SEC analyses, the block copolymer was terminated with methanol (3 ml). The solvent was then removed using a rotary evaporator. Finally, the polymer was precipitated in cold hexane, recovered by filtration and then dried in a vacuum oven at 50° C. overnight. 
     RAFT Synthesis of Poly[(TFEMA-random-DEAEMA)-block-MAA] Copolymer: P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-MAA] 
     For the synthesis of the diblock P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-MAA] copolymers, RAFT synthesized P(TFEMA 14 -r-DEAEMA 14 ), as described in Table 2, was used as macro RAFT agent. Chain extension experiments were carried out to obtain P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-MAA] copolymers at 60° C. in propan-2-ol with AIBN as initiator, using the following ratio ([MAA]/[macro RAFT agent]/[initiator]=90/1/0.5). The polymerisation was allowed to proceed for 3 hours, and a conversion of 87% obtained by  1 H NMR in DMSO. The resultant product, P[(TFEMAx-r-DEAEMAy)-b-MAAz] copolymer with x=14; y=14; z=78 determined by NMR. 
     RAFT Synthesis of Poly(TFEMA-random-DEAEMA-random-TMSPMS) Copolymer: P[(TFEMA-r-DEAEMA-r-TMSPMS) as macroRAFT Agent. 
     TFEMA (0.619 g, 3.68 mmol), DEAEMA (3 g, 16.5 mmol), TMSPMS (0.36 g, 1.47 mmol), CPDB (0.111 g, 0.5 mmol), AIBN (35 mg, 0.2 mmol) and toluene (solvent, 1 g) were introduced in a schlenk tube containing a magnetic stirrer. The mixture was degassed by nitrogen bubbling and heated at 80° C. in a thermostated oil bath under nitrogen atmosphere. After 70 minutes, the reaction was cooled to 0° C. to stop the polymerization. After precipitation in a cold hexane, the recovered polymer was dried in a vacuum oven overnight at 40° C. The polymer obtained P(TFEMA 6 -r-DEAEMA 26 -r-TMSPMS 2 ), was analysed by NMR and SEC. 
     RAFT Synthesis of Poly[(TFEMA-random-DEAEMA-random-TMSPMS)-block-DMAEMAT Copolymer: PUTFEMA-r-DEAEMA-r-TMSPMS)-b-DMAEMA]. 
     The previous macroRAFT agent P(TFEMA 6 -r-DEAEMA 26 -r-TMSPMS 2 ) (2.76 g), DMAEMA (8.69 g, 55 mmol), AIBN (36 mg, 0.22 mmol) and toluene (2.85 g) were introduced in a schlenk tube containing a magnetic stirrer. The mixture was degassed by nitrogen bubbling and heated at 80° C. in a thermostated oil bath under nitrogen atmosphere. After 2 hours, the reaction was cooled to 0° C. to stop the polymerization. After precipitation in a cold hexane, the recovered polymer was dried in a vacuum oven overnight at 40° C. The polymer obtained P(TFEMA 6 -r-DEAEMA 26 -r-TMSPMS 2 )-b-DMAEMA 100  was analysed by NMR and SEC. 
     EXAMPLE 2 
     Coating of Substrate with Copolymer of the Present Invention 
     The copolymer molecules were dissolved in water at the desired pH and salt conditions under gentle agitation. Typically the system was left to equilibrate for 24 hours to be certain that it was fully equilibrated but it is to be appreciated by one skilled in the art that equilibrium may well be achieved within shorter timescales. Agitation is not critical and simple slow stirring is sufficient. 
     The substrate of interest was then exposed to the solution. Adsorption was found to be complete after a few minutes. Suitable application methods include for example but are not limited to: dipping, spraying, spin coating, roller coating, brush coating and rinsing of the surface. 
     The substrate was then rinsed with pure solvent (water) to remove loosely held copolymer molecules at the surface. However, it is also to be appreciated that this step is not essential for the application under real conditions. 
       FIGS. 7 and 8  of the accompanying drawings demonstrate that adsorbed micellar aggregates are visible at the solid liquid interface. These surface adsorbed films form spontaneously and provide a continuous surface covering. The adsorbed films also provide local micro(nano)-scale structure at the solid surface and the structure is pH-dependant.  FIG. 7  illustrates the aggregates at pH 9 and  FIG. 8  illustrates the aggregates at pH4. Adsorption kinetic data indicates that adsorption occurs rapidly (a few seconds to minutes) from aqueous dispersion, see  FIG. 9  of the accompanying drawings. Wash-on and wash-off data indicated that the adsorbed film is robust after an initial rinse phase that removes loosely bound material. The stimulus response of the layers can also be seen in these data; the reversible nature of this response is also seen. 
     AFM images of the surfaces under different pH conditions indicate structure changes are visible (and reversible) as seen in  FIG. 10 . Reversible surface behaviour is related to bulk behaviour that shows a reversible micelle formation as a function of pH in bulk solution. 
       FIG. 11  illustrates force curve data collected at the mica-water interface (background electrolyte is KNO 3  0.01M) and  FIG. 12  illustrates Zeta sizer data for copolymer samples. Additionally, images of a sessile droplet on a dried film of copolymer micelles prepared by deposition from a pH 9 solution onto silica and subsequent washing and drying were taken and the contact angle measured, as seen in  FIG. 14 . 
       FIG. 13A  is an image of a water droplet on an uncoated silica surface having a measured contact angle of 27°. 
       FIGS. 13B to 13E  are images of water droplets at a coated solid surface with different copolymer samples as follows: 
       13 B—coated silica with P(DEAEMA 30 -b-DMAEMA 95 ) copolymer. Measured contact angle is 42°.
   13 C—coated silica with P[(TFEMA 5 -r-DEAEMA 25 )-b-DMAEMA 89 ] copolymer. Measured contact angle is 66°.
   13 D—coated silica with P[(TFEMA 14 -r-DEAEMA 14 )-b-DMAEMA 89 ] copolymer. Measured contact angle is 79°.
   13 E—coated aluminium sheet with P[(TFEMA 14 -r-DEAEMA 14 )-b-DMAEMA 89 ] copolymer. Measured contact angle is 89°.
 
     The roughness of a coated glass slide was calculated using Nanoscope software from AFM images monitored in tapping mode in air. The glass slide was coated with the polymer P[(TFEMA 25 -r-DEAEMA 11 )-b-DMAEMA 94 ]. AFM images and roughness calculations were monitored before water rinsing, after a first rinse with 10 ml of water, after a second and third rinse (each with 10 ml of water) and after a last subsequent rinse (500 ml of water). After each rinsing, the glass slide was dried in nitrogen. It has been observed that the roughness is approximately constant after each rinse, corresponding to no loss of material after rinsing, as shown in  FIG. 14 . The profile of a scratch in the layer was also measured and after rinsing the thickness remained constant. 
     EXAMPLE 3 
     “Easy-to-Clean” or “Self-Cleaning” Properties of Coating According to the Present Invention 
       FIG. 15  illustrates a comparison of the percentage of soiling removed after rinsing. This percentage was calculated from the reflectivity (R) of white light from 16 panels. 8 panels were coated in polymer P[(TFEMA 37 -b-MAA 105 ] and 8 were uncoated. 
     
       
         
           
             
               
                 
                   
                     % 
                      
                     
                         
                     
                      
                     soiling 
                      
                     
                         
                     
                      
                     removed 
                   
                   = 
                   
                     
                       
                         
                           R 
                           r 
                         
                         - 
                         
                           R 
                           s 
                         
                       
                       
                         
                           R 
                           p 
                         
                         - 
                         
                           R 
                           s 
                         
                       
                     
                     × 
                     100 
                   
                 
               
               
                 
                   Equation 
                    
                   
                       
                   
                    
                   
                     ( 
                     2 
                     ) 
                   
                 
               
             
           
         
       
     
     where:
 
R r =R of rinsed panel, R s =R of soiled panel and R p  is the R of the panel before soiling.
 
     After the first rinse (20 ml water), 95.4% of the soil was removed from the coated panels compared with just 78.5% removed from uncoated panels. After the second rinse (100 ml water) the percentage removed increased to 96.8% for coated panels and 81.1% for uncoated panels. Most soil is removed during the first rinse and more soil is removed from coated panels than uncoated panels. Accordingly, it is clear that the novel copolymers according to the present invention provide superior “easy-to-clean” or “self-cleaning” results. 
     Further spectrophotometry tests have been carried to evaluate the colour difference between treated and untreated painted aluminium surface.  FIG. 16  illustrate a comparison of the total colour difference ΔE, of soiled panels, panels after rinsing (10 ml water) and panels after a second rinse (100 ml water). Eight panels were coated in polymer P[(TFEMA 37 -b-MAA 105 ] and eight were uncoated. The colour difference was calculated from the CIE 1964 colour system. The system considers the lightness L*, the red-green value a* and the yellow-blue value, b*. 
       Δ E =(Δ L   2   +Δa   2   +Δb   2 ) 1/2   Equation (3) 
       where: 
       Δ L=L   1   −L   2   , Δa=a   1   −a   2   , Δb×b   1   −b   2    
     and 
     ΔL, Δa, Δb are the colour differences in CIE L*a*b* colour space 
     L 1 , a 1 , b 1  are the L*a*b* values for sample 1 (clean panel before soiling) 
     L 2 , a 2 , b 2  are the L*a*b* values for sample 2 (panel after soiling or rinsing) 
     After soiling, the colour difference ΔE is less for coated panels (13.7) than for uncoated panels (16.6). This corresponds to less initial soil adhesion on the coated panels. After the first rinse, ΔE decreases to 0.6 for coated panels and 3.4 for uncoated panels. Therefore, more soiling has been removed from the coated panels. After the second rinse, ΔE decreases again to 0.5 for coated panels and 3.0 for uncoated panels. Although more soil is removed after the second rinse, it is apparent that most soil is removed after the first rinse and only excessive rinsing will promote further removal. This demonstrates clearly that the novel copolymer of the present invention once coated onto a surface provide an easier soil removal compared with uncoated surface. The coated panels also perform better due to less initial soil adhesion. 
     Self-cleaning tests were carried out on aluminium sheet that had been powder coated with a polyester based resin. A yellow dye was used as an indicator as to how much and where the copolymer was applied during application. Test pictures clearly showed a change from hydrophilic surface to hydrophobic surface after application of copolymer, as illustrated by  FIGS. 13A and 13E  of the accompanying drawings referred to above. 
       FIG. 18A to 18D  of the accompanying drawings illustrate the “easy-to-clean” or “self-cleaning” properties of sheets A, coated with a copolymer according to the present invention. After rinsing with water, dirt is washed from the coated sheets A, but remains on the uncoated sheets B, even after 14 months, as seen in  FIG. 18D . 
     Whilst not wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it appears that dirt initially sticks to the coating and when it rains, water flows down the surface in a sheet-like manner which washes away the dirt. In contrast, for the uncoated sheet, it appears that water trickles along the surface of the sheet. The effect of the hydrophobic inner core of the micelles on the drying process was also surprising. The inner core is very hydrophobic which appears to make any remaining water roll into a ball and run off the surface causing it to dry very quickly. It also appeared to eliminate the dirty “streaking” seen on uncoated panels. Accordingly, it is clear that the novel copolymers according to the present invention provide superior “easy-to-clean or self-cleaning” results. 
     Furthermore, the novel copolymer coating according to the present invention allows a fast drying with the result that no drops remain on the surface. Indeed, it has been observed that due to the hydrophilic nature of the treated surface, any water present form a thin, continuous or semi-continuous layer rather than discreet droplets on a treated surface. When water in this form evaporates, the minerals therein are not concentrated enough in terms of location to be visible. Accordingly, no spots are formed. Much of the water film or sheet slides off the washed surfaces by the action of gravity without forming rivulets, streaking or tracking. In other words, water slides off as a sheet rather than discrete droplets or rivulets conglomerated along a particular path on the washed surface. Rinse water that does not slide off remains on the washed surfaces still in the form of a thin sheet or film. When the sheet or film evaporates, water spots do not form as is clearly illustrated in  FIGS. 19A and 19B . 
     EXAMPLE 4 
     Use of Coating According to the Present Invention as Responsive Uptake/Release Materials 
     Water soluble block copolymers are of interest because copolymer micelles can provide a suitable local environment for the loading of hydrophobic actives such as drugs and dyes. Stimulus-responsive copolymers according to the present invention (in particular P[TFEMA-r-DEAEMA)-b-DMAEMA]) undergo reversible micellar self assembly in aqueous solution, thus offering opportunities for use as responsive uptake/release materials. 
     A series of experiments were performed using micelles preloaded with a hydrophobic organic dye, (Orange OT). Copolymer micelle layer was prepared on silica colloid (AngstromSphere) via the following procedure. An aqueous solution of P[(TFEMA 14 -r-DEAEMA 14 )-b-DMAEMA 90 ] at pH 9 (10 ml, 500 ppm in KNO 3  (10 mM) was mixed with the Orange OT at pH 9. Then this mixture was added to a dispersion of the silica sol (white, 0.1 g) and tumbled 12 hours to ensure full equilibration. The sample was then centrifuged (4000 rpm, 20 minutes) to separate the colloidal particles from the nonadsorbed copolymer. Approximatively all of the supernatant was removed and orange coated silica particles were recovered (see picture B,  FIG. 20 ). The sedimented particles were redispersed in an electrolyte solution (KNO 3 ) at pH 4 for 12 hours. The sample was then centrifuged to isolate the colloidal particles (see picture C,  FIG. 20 ) and the supernatant removed. 
     The pictures A and B clearly show a colour change before and after coating the silica particles. It is obvious that micelle-copolymer can capture the dye. In this respect because of its low water solubility, this dye is adsorbed into the hydrophobic cores of the copolymer micelles. After initial preparation of dye-loaded copolymer micelle solution, a silica colloid was coated by this solution. After deposition of one layer, the silica colloid becomes colourful, indicating the capture of the dye. Then, by rinsing the coated silica particles with a buffer solution at low pH, the dye colour was removed showing the release mechanism of this system. 
     EXAMPLE 5 
     Use of Coating According to Present Invention as Responsive Uptake/Release Materials 
     A series of experiments were performed using micelles preloaded with chrysoidine, a yellow dye. 
     Copolymer micelle layer was prepared on silica colloid (AngstromSphere) via the following procedure. An aqueous solution of P[(TFEMA 5 -r-DEAEMA 25 )-b-DMAEMA 89 ] at pH 9 (10 ml, 500 ppm in KNO 3  (10 mM) was mixed with the Chrysoidine (yellow dye less hydrophobic than Orange OT) at pH 9. This mixture was then added to a dispersion of the silica sol (white, 0.1 g) and tumbled for 12 hours to ensure full equilibration. The sample was then centrifuged (4000 rpm, 20 minutes) to separate the colloidal particles from the nonadsorbed copolymer. Approximatively all supernatant was removed and yellow coated silica particles were recovered (see picture B,  FIG. 21 ). The sedimented particles were redispersed in an electrolyte solution (KNO 3 ) at pH 4 for 30 minutes. Then, after centrifugation (4000 rpm, 10 min) the supernatant was removed and slightly yellow colloidal particles were isolated (see picture C,  FIG. 21 ). After a longer period of rinsing at pH 4 (3 hours), and centrifugation, white colloidal particles were obtained, proving a total release of the dye (see picture D,  FIG. 21 ). 
     REFERENCES 
     
         
         1. Emma Dorey, Chemistry &amp; industry, issue 18, 5 (September 2006), “ No more need to clean”   
         2. Ralf Blossey, Nature Materials, vol 2, 301-306, (2003), “ Self - cleaning surfaces - virtual realities”   
         3. Jon Evans, Chemistry&amp; industry, issue 18, 16-17 (September 2006), “ Go with the flow”   
         4. Mathilde Callies, David Quéré, Soft matter, vol 1, 55-61, (2005), “ On water repellency”   
         5. Taolei Sun, Wenlong Song, Lei Jiang, Chem. Comm., 1723-1725, (2005), “ Control over the responsive wettability of poly ( NIPAAm )  film in a large extent by introducing an irresponsive molecule”   
         6. a/ S. Herminghaus, Europhys. Lett., 52, 165, (2000), “ Roughness - induced non - wetting”. b/ J. Bico, U. Thiele, D. Quéré Colloids Surf., A,  206, 41, (2002), “ Wetting of textured surfaces ”. c/ H. Li, X. Wang, Y. Song, Y. Liu, Q. Li, L. Jiang, D. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 40, 1743,(2001), “ Super -“ Amphiphobic” Aligned Carbon Nanotube Films ”. d/ L. Feng, S. Li, H. Li, J. Zhai, Y. Song, L. Jiang, D. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 41, 1221, (2002), “ Super - Hydrophobic Surface of Aligned Polyacrylonitrile Nanofibers ”. e/ L. Feng, Y. Song, J. Zhai, B. Liu, J. Xu, L. Jiang, D. Zhu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 42, 800, (2003), “ Creation of a Superhydrophobic Surface from an Amphiphilic Polymer ”. f/ T. Onda, S. Shibuichi, N. Satoh, K. Tsujii, Langmuir, 12, 2125, (1996), “ Super - Water - Repellent Fractal Surfaces”.    
         7. Igor Luzinov, Sergiy Minky, Vladimir V. Tsukruk, Prog. Polym. Sci., vol 29, 635-698, (2004), “ Adaptative and responsive surfaces through controlled reorganization of interfacial polymer layers”   
         8. a/ Anthony M. Granville, William J. Brittain, Macromol. Rapid. Comm., vol 25, 1298-1302, (2004) “ Stimuli responsive semi fluorinated polymer brushes on porous silica substrates ”. b/ Lei That, Fevzi C. Cebeci, Robert E. Cohen, Michael F. Rubner, NanoLetters, vol 4, 7, 1349-1353, (2004), “ Stable superhydrophobic coating from polyelectrolyte multilayers ”. c/ Motoshi Yamanaka, Kazuki Sada, Mikiji Miyata, Knji Hanabusa, Kazunori Nakano, Chem Comm, 2248-2250, (2006), “ Construction of superhydrophobic surfaces by fibrous aggregation of perfluoroalkyl chain - containing organogelators”   
         9. Akira Nakajima, Kazuhito Hashimoto, and Toshiya Watanabe, Langmuir, 16 (17), 7044-7047, (2000), “ Transparent Superhydrophobic Thin Films with Self - Cleaning Properties”   
         10. a/ Eiji Hosono, Shinobu Fujihara, Itaru Honma, Haoshen Zhou; JACS, vol 127, 13458-13459, (2005), “ Superhydrophobicity perpendicular nanopin film by the bottom up process ”. b/ Xi Yu, Zhiqiang Wang, Yugui Jiang, Feng Shi, Xi Zhang, Adv. Mater. Vol 17, 1289-1293, (2005), “ Reversible pH - responsive surface from superhydrophobicity to superhydrophilicity ”. c/ A. A. Abramzon, Khimia i Zhizu (1982), no. 11, 38 40. 
         11. J. Rodriguez-Hernandez, F. Checot, Y. Gnanou, S. Lecommandoux, Prog. Polym. Sci., 30, 691-724, (2005), “ Toward smart nano - objects by self assembly of block copolymers in solution”