Patent Publication Number: US-2022238262-A1

Title: Modified La-Fe-Si magnetocaloric alloys

Description:
RELATED APPLICATION 
     This application claims benefit and priority of provisional application Ser. No. 62/710,968 filed Mar. 5, 2018, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. 
    
    
     CONTRACTUAL ORIGIN OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention was made with government support under Grant No. DE-AC02-07CH11358 awarded by the U.S. Department of Energy. The government has certain rights in the invention. 
    
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to magnetocaloric materials based on the La—Fe—Si alloy system compositionally modified to improve mechanical stability, such as substantially reduced brittleness, improve thermal conductivity, and preserve analogous or even higher magnetocaloric effects compared to other known and commercially available La—Fe—Si based magnetocaloric materials for use as working bodies in magnetocaloric heat pumping applications, including as magnetic refrigerant materials. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The ability of magnetic materials to change their temperature due to variation of applied magnetic field (magnetocaloric effect, MCE) is a physical phenomenon that could lead to the realization of clean, highly energy efficient refrigeration and heat pumping systems. 
     However, for this to be realized, magnetic materials should possess (i) large MCE, both magnetic entropy change, ΔS M , and adiabatic temperature change, ΔT ad , in magnetic field less than 2 Tesla, which is the current limit for permanent magnets, and (ii) Curie temperature near about 300 K for room temperature application. In addition the materials should be reasonably inexpensive, mechanically and chemically stable, and contain no toxic elements. 
     Various alloy systems have been proposed as potential magnetocaloric materials including La(Fe,Si) 13  [1], Fe 2 P-type compounds [2], MnAs [3], Heusler alloys (MnCoGe-based alloys) [4], Fe 49 Rh 51  [5], rare earth based materials (Gd and Gd 5 Si 2-x Ge x ) [6,7] among other. However, all of them have one or more of the following disadvantages: contain toxic, critical, or expensive elements, exhibit small magnetocaloric effect at desired magnetic field of 2 Tesla or lower, have low Curie temperature, or poor mechanical properties, such as excessive brittleness for the La(Fe,Si) 13  materials, which readily suffer from decrepitation or disintegration upon handling and, especially, upon thermal and magnetic cycling during operation of a magnetocaloric heat pump. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to magnetocaloric materials based on the La—Fe—Si alloy system, such as for example the LaFe 13-z Si z  system, where 1.1≤z≤1.9 modified by inclusion of a small but effective amount of at least one of Al, Ga, and In to improve the inherent mechanical stability of the alloy in terms of substantially reducing its brittleness and increasing its handle-ability and mechanical stability during processing and use operations, while preserving similar or providing even higher magnetocaloric effects compared to other known and commercially available La—Fe—Si based magnetocaloric materials. To this end, certain illustrative embodiments include at least one of Al, Ga, and In in an amount of 0.07 atomic % to 3.5 atomic %, individually or collectively. 
     A further illustrative embodiment of the present invention involves a first-order phase-transition magnetocaloric alloy represented by LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y  where 1.1≤z≤1.9, and X is at least one of Al, Ga and/or In present in an amount 0.01≤y≤0.5 (i.e., from 0.07 atomic % to 3.5 atomic %) which is effective to substantially reduce alloy brittleness, enabling the alloy to be handled in one&#39;s hand and/or to serve as a working body in a magnetocaloric heat pumping device without decrepitation or disintegration. Another illustrative embodiment of the present invention involves the above first-order phase-transition magnetocaloric alloy that further includes M which is at least one of Co, Mn, Cr, and V substituted for Fe in the modified La—Fe—Si based alloy composition. Still another illustrative of the present invention involves including interstitial hydrogen in the modified La—Fe—Si based alloy composition. 
     The present invention envisions in certain embodiments magnetocaloric alloys, both as bulk arc-melt/drop-cast, as heat treated, and/or as rapidly solidified (using melt spinning, any method of atomization, splat cooling, or any other rapid solidification technique) having one of the following compositions:
         a. LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═Al, Ga, In with 1.1≤z≤1.9 and 0.01≤y≤0.5   b. La(Fe 1-w M w ) 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═Al, Ga, In, and M=Co, Mn, Cr, V with 0.05≤w≤0.1, and 1.1≤z≤1.9, and 0.01≤y≤0.5   c. LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y H v , where X═Al, Ga, In with 1.1≤z≤1.9, 0.01≤y≤0.5, 0≤v≤2.3   d. La(Fe 1-w M w ) 1-z Si z-y X y H v , where X═Al, Ga, In, and M=Co, Mn, Cr, V with 0.05≤w≤0.1, and 1.1≤z≤1.9, and 0.01≤y≤0.5, and 0&lt;v≤2.3
 
and exhibiting large magnetocaloric effect tunable between about 170 K and about 350 K as well as having improved mechanical stability and even some machinability.
       

     The present invention provides a magnetic regenerator prepared from alloy compositions set forth above. The regenerator may be used in any form such as including, but not limited to, packed alloy particles, such as for example packed spheres or irregularly-shaped particles, or stacked parallel alloy plates. The regenerator can comprise 3D-printed spherical alloy particles and/or 3D-printed irregularly shaped alloy particles. The present invention also provides a magnetic refrigerator or heat pump using such regenerators. 
     Additional details and advantages of the present invention will become readily apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description, wherein only the illustrative embodiments of the invention are shown and described. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments, and its several details are capable of modifications in various obvious respects, all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature, and not as restrictive. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  shows Rietveld refinement of x-ray powder diffraction (XRD) pattern of LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═In, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample after arc-melting, drop casting and heat treatment. Vertical bars underneath the main panel mark calculated positions of Bragg peaks of the phases present in the sample: LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  (labeled as LaM 13 ) and Fe. The bottom panel shows the difference between the observed and calculated intensities. 
         FIG. 2  shows hydrogen absorption kinetics of LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═In, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample during the second activation cycle. 
         FIG. 3  shows hydrogen absorption kinetics of LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═In, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample during the third activation cycle. 
         FIG. 4  shows hydrogen absorption kinetics of LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═In, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample during the fourth activation. 
         FIG. 5  shows hydrogen absorption kinetics of LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═In, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample during the final hydrogenation-homogenization step a)—pressure change; b)—hydrogen content change. The negative values in (b) are meaningless and unphysical. 
         FIG. 6  shows Rietveld refinement of XRD pattern of the fully hydrogenated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y H v , where X═In, z=1.2, y=0.1 and v=2.3, i.e., LaFe 11.85 Si 1.1 In 0.1 H 2.3  sample. Vertical bars underneath the main panel mark calculated positions of Bragg peaks of the phases present in the sample: LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 H 2.3  (labeled as LaM 13 H 2.3 ) and Fe. The bottom panel shows the difference between the observed and calculated intensities. 
         FIG. 7  shows magnetization as a function of temperature for drop cast and heat treated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═In, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample in magnetic fields up to 5 Tesla. 
         FIG. 8  shows magnetization as a function of temperature for drop cast and heat treated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═Al, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Al 0.1  sample with in magnetic fields up to 5 Tesla. 
         FIG. 9  shows magnetization as a function of temperature for drop cast and heat treated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═Ga, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Ga 0.1  sample in magnetic fields up to 2 Tesla. 
         FIG. 10  shows magnetization as a function of temperature for drop cast and heat treated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═In, z=1.5 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 1.5 Si 1.4 In 0.1  sample in a magnetic field of 0.1 Tesla. 
         FIG. 11  shows magnetization as a function of temperature for drop cast, heat treated, and then hydrogenated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y H v , where X═In, z=1.2, y=0.1 and v=2.3, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 H 2.3  sample in magnetic fields up to 2 Tesla. 
         FIG. 12  shows magnetization as a function of temperature for drop cast, heat treated, and then hydrogenated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y H v , where X═Al, z=1.2, y=0.1 and v=2.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Al 0.1 H 2.1  sample in magnetic fields up to 2 Tesla. 
         FIG. 13  shows entropy change, ΔS M , as a function of temperature for drop cast and heat treated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═In, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample in magnetic fields up to 5 Tesla. 
         FIG. 14  shows entropy change, ΔS M , as a function of temperature for drop cast and heat treated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═Al, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Al 0.1  sample in magnetic fields up to 5 Tesla. 
         FIG. 15  shows entropy change, ΔS M , as a function of temperature for drop cast and heat treated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═Ga, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Ga 0.1  sample in magnetic fields up to 2 Tesla. 
         FIG. 16  shows entropy change, ΔS M , as a function of temperature for drop cast, heat treated, and then hydrogenated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y H v , where X═In, z=1.2, y=0.1 and v=2.3, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 H 2.3  sample in magnetic fields up to 2 Tesla. 
         FIG. 17  shows entropy change, ΔS M , as a function of temperature for drop cast, heat treated, and then hydrogenated LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y H v , where X═Al, z=1.2, y=0.1 and v=2.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Al 0.1 H 2.1  sample in magnetic fields up to 2 Tesla. 
         FIG. 18  shows magnetization as a function of temperature for melt spun ribbons of LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═In, z=1.2 and y=0.1, i.e., LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  measured in 0.1 Tesla magnetic field after different heat treatments as marked. 
         FIG. 19  shows heat capacity, Cp, of drop cast and heat treated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  measured as a function of temperature in zero magnetic field, H=0. 
         FIG. 20  shows heat capacity, Cp, of drop cast and heat treated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  measured as a function of temperature in 1 Tesla magnetic field, H=1 T. 
         FIG. 21  shows heat capacity, Cp, of drop cast and heat treated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  measured as a function of temperature in 2 Tesla magnetic field, H=2 T. 
         FIG. 22  shows heat capacity, Cp, of drop cast and heat treated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  measured as a function of temperature in 5 Tesla magnetic field, H=5 T. 
         FIG. 23  shows heat capacity, Cp, of drop cast and heat treated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  measured as a function of temperature in 2 Tesla magnetic field, H=2 T, after the sample went through five heating and cooling cycles in magnetic fields H=0, 1, 2, 5, and 2 T. 
         FIG. 24  shows the magnetic entropy change, ΔS m , as a function of temperature calculated from heat capacity data of drop cast and heat treated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  measured in magnetic fields of 0 and 2 Tesla, i.e. for magnetic field change, ΔH=2 T. 
         FIG. 25  shows thermal conductivity of drop cast and heat treated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  samples measured using two different rectangular bars (#1 and #2) as a function of temperature. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     Embodiments of the present invention relate to certain magnetocaloric materials that exhibit the so-called magnetocaloric effect, which is a thermal response of the material when subject to an external applied magnetic field change. The magnetocaloric effect is more prominent closer to large magnetization changes in respect to the temperature, i.e., at magnetic transitions. Different magnetic transitions may present large magnetocaloric effect: ferromagnetic (FM) to paramagnetic (PM); antiferromagnetic (AFM) to FM; spin glass to FM; etc. 
     The present invention embodies new chemical compositions that lead to improvements of La—Fe—Si based magnetocaloric alloys, such as the first-order phase-transition LaFe 13-z Si z  system, where 1.1≤z≤1.9, which are achieved by inclusion of a small but effective amount of at least one of Group 13 elements; Al, Ga, and/or In, to improve mechanical stability of the solid alloys by significantly reducing their brittleness, enabling the solid alloys to be manually handled and serve as working bodies in magnetic regenerators without decrepitation (breaking apart) or disintegration from the handling or during operation. Moreover, this improvement is achieved while preserving the NaZn 13 -type crystal structure and preserving similar or providing even higher magnetocaloric effects as compared to other known and commercially available La—Fe—Si based magnetocaloric materials. Certain illustrative embodiments include at least one of Al, Ga, and/or In in the alloys in an amount of 0.07 atomic % to 3.5 atomic % to this end. These improvements are achieved in bulk arc-melt/drop-cast condition, and/or in heat treated condition, and/or in rapidly solidified condition (after melt spinning, atomization, or after any other rapid solidification technique). Moreover, the materials do not disintegrate or decrepitate after hydrogenation. 
     Certain illustrative embodiments of the present invention involve substituting at least one of Al, Ga, and/or In for at least some Si in the La—Fe—Si based alloy composition. Optionally, at least one of Co, Mn, Cr, and V can be substituted for Fe in the modified La—Fe—Si based alloy composition (i.e. modified with at least one of Al, Ga, In), and interstitial hydrogen optionally can be included in the modified La—Fe—Si based alloy composition. Another illustrative embodiment of the present invention involves the above first-order phase-transition magnetocaloric alloy that further includes M which is at least one of Co, Mn, Cr, and V substituted for Fe in the modified La—Fe—Si based alloy composition. Such alloy compositions are formulated by cheap and easily processed elements with large mechanical integrity. 
     The modified La—Fe—Si alloy compositions can be chemically tailored as just described in a manner to tune the magneto-structural transition temperatures of the materials; for example, to provide a large magnetocaloric effect that is tunable between about 170 K and about 350 K. Such alloys exhibit metamagnetic transitions from the paramagnetic states in zero or low magnetic fields (generally less than 0.1 Tesla) into ferromagnetic states when induced by the magnetic field of 0.5 Tesla or higher applied at or near the respective Curie temperature. The metamagnetic transitions proceed with phase volume change but without crystal symmetry change. A reverse metamagnetic transition occurs when the high magnetic field is reduced back to less than 0.1 Tesla. The magneto-structural transition temperatures of the modified alloy compositions also may be controlled by alloy chemistries and/or finely tuned by heat-treatments. 
     Illustrative embodiments of chemically modified alloy compositions pursuant to embodiments of the invention include, but are not limited to, the following compositions:
         a. LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═Al, Ga, In with 1.1≤z≤1.9 and 0.01≤y≤0.5   b. La(Fe 1-w M w ) 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═Al, Ga, In, and M=Co, Mn, Cr, V with 0.05:5≤w≤0.1, and 1.1≤z≤1.9, and 0.01≤y≤0.5   c. LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y H v , where X═Al, Ga, In with 1.1≤z≤1.9, 0.01≤y≤0.5, 0≤v≤2.3   d. La(Fe 1-w M w ) 13-z Si z-y X y H v , where X═Al, Ga, In, and M=Co, Mn, Cr, V with 0.05≤w≤0.1, and 1.1≤z≤1.9, and 0.01≤y≤0.5, and 0≤v≤2.3
 
and exhibiting large magnetocaloric effect tunable between about 170 K and about 350 K as well as having improved mechanical stability and even some machinability.
       

     The magnetocaloric alloys can be made with improved properties both in bulk arc-melt/drop-cast condition with subsequent heat treatment and in rapidly solidified condition (melt spinning, any atomization method, e.g., gas atomization, or any other rapid solidification technique). An illustrative processing method involves arc-melting the elemental components of the alloy composition in the correct stoichiometry, or with an excess of 3.5 wt. % Mn, if used, to account for its loss due to evaporation. The solidified material is then (optional step) drop-cast from a high temperature molten state to form a more chemically homogeneous casting. The casting can be then re-melted and re-solidified, and subjected to a homogenizing heat treatment. Alternately, the casting can be rapidly solidified; for example, using melt-spinning, splat cooling or atomization. For example, the melt-spun ribbons are prepared using induction melting of ingots in a quartz crucible at ⅓ atmosphere pressure of high purity He gas at the temperature of approximately 1570 K, and then ejected at approximately 0.1 atmosphere overpressure of helium at onto a copper chill wheel rotating at a tangential speed of about 25 to 50 m/s, which are common parameters of the melt-spinning technique. The parent phase is easily formed and stable. Other methods of rapid solidification of molten alloy composition can be utilized including, but not limited to atomization, selective laser melting, and 3D printing. A regenerator can be custom designed and fabricated using spherical and/or irregular particles of the modified La—Fe—Si alloy pursuant to embodiments of the invention (without or with appropriate binder) using 3D printing technology using direct metal laser sintering, selective laser sintering, and/or powder bed and inkjet head 3D printing. 
     Following drop casting or rapid solidification, the solidified alloy material may then be heat-treated at a temperature and for a time to crystallize any possible remains of amorphous material, and/or to complete solid state reactions, and/or to release internal stress after the rapid quenching. 
     The rapidly solidified alloy material, or the heat treated alloy material from the preceding paragraphs, may be subjected to optional annealing heat treatment at different temperatures and times to closely control the magneto-structural transition temperature of the material and thus the operation temperature of magnetic refrigeration material. 
     The following examples are offered to further illustrate but not limit embodiments of the present invention: 
     EXAMPLES 
     Example 1 
     Alloy Preparation 
     Approximately 10 gm of a stoichiometric LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═Al, Ga and/or In, and 1.1≤z≤1.9 and 0.01≤y≤0.5 alloys were prepared by arc melting process. Alloy compositions were prepared with high purity elements Fe, Si, and X being weighed stoichiometrically and arc melted three to five times under argon atmosphere followed by addition of high purity La and arc melting three to five times under high purity argon atmosphere. The arc melted buttons were then drop-cast into an about 1 cm diameter ingot for a finer grain size and homogeneous solidification structure throughout the ingot. 
     The alloy compositions so made are represented by:
     LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1      LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Al 0.1      LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Ga 0.1      LaFe 11.5 Si 1.4 In 0.1      

     The as-prepared, drop-cast alloys were heat treated at 1050′C for two weeks followed by slow cooling to room temperature. Room temperature x-ray diffraction (XRD) confirmed formation of the major phase with NaZn 13 -type crystal structure containing about 10-20% by volume of α-iron as an impurity phase, the presence of which did not deteriorate the value of the magnetic entropy change, yet the alloys demonstrated much improved mechanical stability. 
     In particular, improvement in mechanical stability of the heat treated solid alloys was evidenced by their being able to be manually handled and tested as described below without decrepitation, disintegrating, or shattering if dropped as a result of their substantially reduced alloy brittleness. In contrast, the parent heat treated solid alloys (i.e. the same alloys without inclusion of Al, Ga, and/or In) are excessively brittle and disintegrate in one&#39;s hand with the slightest of manipulation, and they also decrepitate on their own upon hydrogenation due to an intrinsic volume expansion. 
     Example 2 
     Hydrogenation 
     The Curie temperature of the alloy samples of Example 1 can be increased to and above room temperature by proper hydrogenation of the alloys, which preserves the strong metamagnetic transition thereby keeping the large magnetocaloric effect of the alloys. In order to bring the Curie temperature close to room temperature, several drop cast alloys were hydrogenated. Hydrogenation can be effected by annealing the heat treated solid alloy in a high purity hydrogen or hydrogen-containing atmosphere for a time sufficient for the alloy to absorb interstitial hydrogen. For example, the following procedure was used to introduce interstitial hydrogen into each of certain alloy samples, as illustrated below for LaFe 13-z Si z-y X y , where X═In, z=1.2, and y=0.1, i.e., for the alloy with LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  composition. Each sample received multiple activations set forth below. 
     First Activation: 
     Each LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample was loaded in an autoclave.
         The sample was heated to 300° C. for about 6 h in vacuum. After this the sample was cooled to 230° C. and kept at this temperature overnight (about 17 hours) under vacuum.   While keeping sample at 230° C., the reservoir was pressurized to about 5 bar hydrogen pressure (V (reservoir) =12.26 ml, V (autoclave) =16.704 ml) and kept at the hydrogen atmosphere for 24 hours.   After that the sample was evacuated, and while keeping sample in vacuum, heated to 360° C., held at this temperature for 1 hour. After full dehydrogenation the sample was cooled down to room temperature with a cooling rate of 1° C./min.       

     Second Activation (FIG.  2 ) of the Sample: 
     
         
         
           
             At room temperature the same sample was pressurized to about 5 bar hydrogen pressure. When the measurement was started, the sample was heated to 360° C. at a rate 1° C./min. 
             After the temperature reached 360° C., the sample was kept for 10 hours at this temperature in hydrogen atmosphere. 
             Then the sample was cooled down to room temperature in a cooling rate of 1° C./min. 
             After this the sample was evacuated at room temperature. 
             Keeping the sample under vacuum the autoclave was heated to 360° C., kept at this temperature for 5 hours and cooled to room temperature. 
           
         
       
    
     Third Activation (FIG.  3 ): 
     
         
         
           
             At room temperature the same sample then was pressurized to about 5 bar hydrogen pressure. When kinetic measurement was started, the sample was heated to 200° C. at a rate 1° C./min. 
             The temperature of 200° C. was kept for 5 hours. 
             After this temperature of the sample was increased to 370° C. with a rate of 1° C./min and kept at this temperature for 10 hours 
             Then the sample was cooled down to room temperature in a cooling rate of 1° C./min. 
             After this the sample was evacuated at room temperature. 
             Keeping the sample under vacuum the autoclave was heated from room temperature to 360° C., kept at this temperature for 2 hours and cooled to room temperature. 
           
         
       
    
     Fourth Activation (FIG.  4 ): 
     
         
         
           
             At room temperature the same sample then was pressurized to about 5 bar hydrogen pressure. When kinetic measurement was started, the sample was heated to 200° C. at a rate 1° C./min. 
             The temperature of 200° C. was kept for 5 hours. 
             After this temperature of the sample was increased to 370° C. with a rate of 1° C./min and kept at this temperature for 10 hours 
             Then the sample was cooled down to room temperature in a cooling rate of 1° C./min. 
             After this the sample was evacuated at room temperature. 
             Keeping the sample under vacuum the autoclave was heated from room temperature to 360° C., kept at this temperature for 2 hours and cooled to room temperature. 
           
         
       
    
     Final Hydrogenation and Homogenization of the Same Sample (FIG.  5 ): 
     
         
         
           
             At room temperature the same sample then was pressurized to about 5 bar hydrogen pressure. When kinetic measurement was started, the sample was heated to 200° C. at a rate 1° C./min. 
             The temperature of 200° C. was kept for 5 hours. 
             After this temperature of the sample was increased to 370° C. in a rate of 1° C./min and kept at this temperature for 10 hours. 
             Then the sample was cooled down to 100° C. with a cooling rate of 1° C./min and held at this temperature for 12 hours. This step ensures homogenous distribution of hydrogen in the sample. 
             After the homogenization the sample was cooled down to room temperature with a cooling rate of 1° C./min. 
             According to data presented in  FIG. 5 , part b, the activated sample shows total absorption of about 2.3 H/f.u. after the above multiple activations. 
             After this, the sample was evacuated at room temperature and removed from the autoclave for further analysis.
 
Interstitial hydrides so made are represented by:
 
           
         
         LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 H 2.3    
         LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Al 0.1 H 2.1    
       
    
     Room temperature x-ray diffraction,  FIG. 6 , confirmed that the NaZn 13  crystal structure is preserved after the hydrogenation, and the material still contains about 10-20% by volume of α-iron as an impurity phase. The presence of α-iron does not deteriorate the value of the magnetic entropy change, yet the hydride also demonstrates much improved mechanical stability. The unit cell dimension, a, as expected, increases as the result of hydrogen being inserted into the lattice as summarized in the Table below. Insertion of hydrogen does not change the coordinates of atoms in a statistically significant way, as also shown in the table below, thus the crystal structure of the hydride remains the same but with additional interstitial atoms of hydrogen present. In both examples shown here, the amount of hydrogen absorbed is higher compared to that reported (1.58 H/f.u.) in similar systems [reference 11]. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Crystallographic data of LaFen 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 H 2.3  (before hydrogenation) and 
               
               
                 LaFen 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 H 2.3  (after hydrogenation) obtained as a result of 
               
               
                 Rietveld refinement. Space group Fm-3c. La occupies the 8a (¼, ¼, ¼) 
               
               
                 position, Fe1 occupies the 8b position (0, 0, 0), and a mixture of 
               
               
                 (Fe 10.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 ) occupies the 96i position (0, y/b, z/c). Only y and z 
               
               
                 coordinates of this position are listed in the table with the numbers in 
               
               
                 parentheses representing estimatederrors in the last significant digit 
               
            
           
           
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Coordinates of (Fe 10.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 ) 
               
               
                   
                 in the unit cell 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Material 
                 a (Å) 
                 y/b 
                 z/c 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 LaFe 11.8 8Si 1.1 In 0.1   
                 11.4754(3), 
                 0.1170(2) 
                 0.1793(2) 
               
               
                 LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 H 2.3   
                 11.6210(4) 
                 0.1152(2) 
                 0.1783(2) 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Example 3 
     Curie Temperatures 
     Isofield magnetization (M) measurements were carried out on samples of Example 1 in a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (QD-PPMS) with a vibrating sample magnetometer insert. 
     The Curie temperature, T C , of the LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample was determined from magnetization vs temperature data, M(T), measured in several constant magnetic field shown in  FIG. 7 . T C  is 184K while heating in H=0.1 Tesla. On cooling in 0.1 Tesla field, the transition occurs at T C =181K (not shown in  FIG. 7 ) resulting in thermal hysteresis of 3K. 
     Similarly, the Curie temperature, T C , of the LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Al 0.1  sample was determined to be 173K while heating, see  FIG. 8  and 168 K while cooling (not shown in  FIG. 8 ) at H=0.1 Tesla. 
     Similarly, the Curie temperature, T C , of the LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Ga 0.1  sample was determined to be 187K while heating, see  FIG. 9  at H=0.5 Tesla. 
     Similarly, the Curie temperature, T C , of the LaFe 11.5 Si 1.4 In 0.1  sample was determined to be 207 K while heating, see  FIG. 10  at H=0.1 Tesla. 
     Similarly, the Curie temperature, T C , of the hydrogenated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 H 2.3  sample was determined to be 345 K while heating, see  FIG. 11  at H=0.5 Tesla. 
     Similarly, the Curie temperature, T C , of the hydrogenated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Al 0.1 H 2.1  sample was determined to be 355 K while heating, see  FIG. 12  at H=0.5 Tesla. 
     In all of these samples, the shift of the Curie temperature with magnetic field is greater than 4K/Tesla,  FIGS. 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 . 
     Example 4 
     Magnetocaloric Effect (Magnetic Entropy Change, ΔS M ) 
     All materials described in Examples 1, 2, and 3 exhibit strong metamagnetic transitions in isothermal M(H) measurements. The calculations of the magnetic entropy change, ΔS m , were performed employing Maxwell equation using isofield magnetization measurements carried with 1 K-min-1 temperature sweeps. Isofield magnetization, M(T), measurements were performed in a Quantum Design Physical Property Measurement System (QD-PPMS) with a vibrating sample magnetometer. 
     The corresponding values of the magnetic entropy change for LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  are shown in  FIG. 13 ; for LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Al 0.1  are shown in  FIG. 14 ; for LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Ga 0.1  are shown in  FIG. 15 ; for LaFe 1.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1 H 2.3  are shown in  FIG. 16 ; and for LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 Al 0.1 H 2.1  are shown in  FIG. 17 . All materials of Example 1 demonstrate similar or even higher ΔS M  when compared to the parent materials without adding Al, Ga, and/or In. 
     Example 5 
     Rapidly Solidified Materials 
     The rapidly solidified melt-spun ribbons were prepared using induction melting of drop-cast La(FeSiX) 13  alloys (where X is at least one of Al, Ga, and In as indicated above) in a quartz crucible at ⅓ atmosphere of high purity He gas and then ejected at 0.1 atmosphere overpressure of helium at the melt temperature of 1570 K onto a copper chill wheel rotating at a tangential speed of about 25 m/s. The rapidly solidified ribbons then were optionally heat-treated in order to crystallize possible remains of amorphous material and/or release internal stress after the rapid quenching. Moreover, annealing of the ribbons at different temperatures allows control of the transition temperature and thus operation temperature of magnetic refrigeration material.  FIG. 18  shows magnetization as a function of temperature for LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  measured in magnetic field 0.1 Tesla. The T C  of melt spun ribbons of LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  is ˜10 K higher compare to same composition of drop cast alloy. 
     Example 6 
     Heat Capacity and Thermal Conductivity of Drop-Cast/Heat-Treated Materials 
     The heat capacity of drop cast and heat treated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample of Example 1 was measured in magnetic fields up to 5 Tesla ( FIGS. 19 to 23 ). The magnetic entropy and maximum adiabatic temperature changes were calculated from the heat capacity data, and the magnetic entropy change, ΔS m , for magnetic field change from 0 to 2 Tesla, i.e., for ΔH=2 Tesla is shown in  FIG. 24 . Unlike in earlier known, unsubstituted materials (Lyubina et al., Adv. Mater. 22, 3735, 2010) the indium-substituted alloy composition or compound, as well as other compositions described in this invention, show reversible magnetocaloric effect (both ΔS m  and the maximum adiabatic temperature change, ΔT max ) even after undergoing numerous temperature-field cycles; the materials do not crack or decrepitate, indicating good mechanical stability. For example Lyubina et al., Adv. Mater. 22, 3735, (2010) reported that ΔT max  of bulk LaFe 11.6 Si 1.4  alloy decreases with every cycle, starting from ˜7.3 K at ΔH=2 Tesla during the first cycle, and the sample broke during the fourth cycle. In contrast, in this example, the maximum magnetic entropy and adiabatic temperature changes of the drop cast and heat treated sample remained practically identical: ΔS m =21.7, J kg −1  K −1  and ΔT max =8.2 K for ΔH=2 T during the first cooling-heating cycle, remaining ΔS m =20.3 and ΔT max =8 K for ΔH=2 T during the fifth cooling-heating cycle. No cracking was observed after a total of 20 cycles. 
     Thermal conductivity of drop cast and heat treated LaFe 11.8 Si 1.1 In 0.1  sample of Example 1 was found to be 14 W/K-m at 300 K ( FIG. 25 ), which is significantly higher compared to the reported values for unsubstituted materials (i.e. same alloy without In, Al, and Ga) at the same temperature [˜9 W/K-m, Matsumoto et. al. Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 897, 012011 (2017), Fujieda et. al., J. App. Phys. 95, 2429 (2004)]. 
     Alloys pursuant to the present invention thus show much improved inherent mechanical stability, higher thermal conductivity, and preserve equivalent or even higher magnetocaloric effects compared to other known and commercially available La—Fe—Si based magnetocaloric materials. Moreover, the alloys contain no toxic or hazardous elements and do not contain expensive elements. Curie temperature (operating temperature) T C  can be properly tuned to room temperature, with an extremely large magnetocaloric effect (here evaluated as entropy change, ΔS). The expected commercial applications include, but are not limited to, magnetic refrigeration and magnetic heat pumping. 
     Although the present invention is described above with respect to certain illustrative embodiments, the invention is not limited to these embodiments and changes and modifications can be made therein within the scope of the appended claims. 
     References which are incorporated herein by reference:
     1. S. Fujieda, A. Fujita, and K. Fukamichi,  Appl. Phys. Lett.  81, 1276 (2002).   2. N. H. Dung, Z. Q. Ou, L. Caron, L. Zhang, D. T. Cam Thanh, G. A. de Wijs, R. A. de Groot, K. H. Jirgen Buschow and E. BrUck, Adv. Ener. Mat., V-1, 1215 (2011).   3. H. Wada, and Y. Tanabe, Appl. Phys. Lett., 79, 3302 (2001).   4. Y. K. Fang, C. C. Yeh, C. W. Chang, W. C. Chang, M. G. Zhuband W. Li, Scripta Materialia 57 453 (2007).   5. S. Dankov, A. M. Tishin, V. K. Pecharsky, K. A. Gschneidner Jr., Phys. Rev. B, V-57, 3478 (1998).   6. K. A. Gschneidner, V. K. Pecharsky, A. O. Tsokol, Rep. Prog. Physics, V-68, 1479 (2005).   7. V. K. Pecharsky, K. A. Gschneidner Jr, Phys. Rev. Lett., V-78, 4494 (1997).   8. Chen et al, United States Patent: US 2014/0166159 A1   9. Hu et al, U.S. Pat. No. 9,657,971 B2   10. Kogure et al, U.S. Pat. No. 7,186,303 B2   11. A. Fujita, S. Fujieda, Y. Hasegawa, and K. Fukamichi, Phys. Rev.B, V-67, 104416 (2003).