Patent Publication Number: US-2021162615-A1

Title: Razor blade coating

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO A RELATED APPLICATION 
     This application claims benefit of European Patent Application No. EP19212307.3, filed on Nov. 28, 2019, which is incorporated herein in by reference in its entirety. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE DISCLOSURE 
     1. Field of the Present Disclosure 
     The present concept relates to razor blades and more particularly to razor blade edges and razor blade coatings. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     From the prior art, razor blades have been provided. Suitably placed in a razor cartridge, they offer the ultimate function of cutting hair or shaving. A shape of the razor blade and a coating of the razor blade play an important role in the quality of the shaving. 
     Razor blades are typically described by describing aspects of the cutting edge of the blade. The blade&#39;s cutting edge is often described as terminating in an edge portion which, in turn, terminates in the blade&#39;s ultimate edge (or simply blade edge). The blade&#39;s edge portion typically has a continuously tapering geometry with two sides converging towards and forming the blade edge. Considering the cross-section of the blade&#39;s edge portion, the blade edge is also called the blade tip. If the edge portion and blade edge are shaped robust, the razor blade will be subject to less wear and show a longer service life. However, such a blade profile will also result in larger cutting forces which adversely affect the shaving comfort. A thinner profile will lead to less cutting forces but will also increase the risk of breakage or damage and, thus, result in a shorter service life. Therefore, the profile of the razor blade&#39;s edge and edge portion is based on a trade-off between the cutting forces, the shaving comfort, and the service life that is desired. 
     The blade&#39;s edge and edge portion may be a multilayered structure in that the corresponding parts of the blade&#39;s substrate, typically a stainless steel substrate that has undergone grinding to form a continuously tapering geometry with two substrate sides converging towards a substrate edge, may be coated with various coatings to improve the cutting performance and shaving experience. In particular, the blade&#39;s edge may be coated to provide enhanced hardness which, in turn, enhances the blade&#39;s life expectancy. 
     However, providing a coating on a razor blade edge is a challenge for a number of reasons. First, because the substrate edge has a very peculiar geometry, depositing a coating on it which would operate as a suitable coating by enhancing the cutting properties and durability of the razor blade edge is very difficult. Second, razor blades are a mass consumption good, so the coatings must be consistently applied from product to product, and at a high throughput, which requires a coating compatible with a very reliable process. Third, and perhaps most importantly, razor blade edges have to be very thin and are often only a few micrometers in thickness at the blade edge. This lack in material thickness has a number of consequences when designing blade coatings: First of all, experiences of conventional tooling coatings cannot be readily transferred to razor blades. Conventional industrial tooling coatings are typically several micrometers (often up to 15 μm) in thickness and such bulky coatings cannot be readily applied to filigree razor blade edges. However, the bulkiness of industrial tooling coatings provides resistance against compressive stress and, thus, avoids fracture initiation and propagation in the coating. The bulkiness also intrinsically provides a certain degree of inherent fracture toughness since more bulk also means more sites in the coating material which can act as points of absorption of energy which would otherwise result in lattice dislocation movements and crack propagation. Finally, in comparison to conventional industrial tooling coatings, razor blades edges are so thin that distortions of the razor blade edge during the blade&#39;s cutting action are not negligible and induce stresses in the hard coating which exceed comparable stresses in conventional industrial tooling coatings. To summarize, the design of razor blade coatings is subject to a unique set of design considerations not shared with other coating applications. Therefore, it is unfortunately not a straight-forward exercise to apply conventional industrial tooling coatings to razor blades. Rather, it is necessary to thoroughly investigate potential coating candidates for their suitability as razor blade coatings. 
     There have been attempts to coat razor blades or to improve such coatings in the prior art. For example, WO 2006/027016 A1 discloses a razor blade coating comprising chromium and carbon. More recently, WO 2016/015771 A1 discloses a razor blade comprising a strengthening coating comprising titanium and boron. This application reports that razor blades with a TiB x -containing coating preserve their cutting ability, shape and integrity in a more effective manner during cutting action than comparable blades coated with chromium and carbon. 
     However, despite the progress made in improving the hard coating of razor blades, there remains a need for further improvement of blade durability, in particular for blade designs which have particularly thin blade edges and low cutting forces. 
     SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE 
     The present inventors have conducted diligent investigations to identify a coating which is suitable for application in razor blades and which is endowed with sufficient hardness but also elasticity and fracture toughness to provide the razor blade with improved wear resistance and resistance against degradation during use. 
     In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed towards a razor blade for a hand-held razor comprising a stainless steel razor blade substrate terminating in a substrate edge portion. The substrate edge portion may have a continuously tapering geometry with two substrate sides converging towards a substrate edge. At least the substrate edge may be provided with a hard coating comprising the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. 
     In some embodiments, the hard coating is directly provided on the substrate edge. Alternatively, the substrate edge may be indirectly provided with the hard coating comprising the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. In particular, in some embodiments, an adhesion-promoting coating is deposited at least onto the substrate edge to provide a first coated substrate edge and the hard coating comprising the elements titanium, boron, and carbon is deposited at least onto the first coated substrate edge. 
     In some embodiments, the hard coating may comprise titanium carbides and titanium borides. In some embodiments, the hard coating may further comprise boron carbides. 
     In some embodiments, the hard coating may comprise at least about 70 at %, more specifically at least about 80 at %, and in particular at least about 90 at %, of the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. In particular, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may comprise between 90 at % and 100 at % of the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. More specifically, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may comprise at least 95 at % of the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. Therefore, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may comprise between 95 at % and 100 at % of the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. More specifically, in some embodiments, the hard coating may consist of essentially the elements titanium, boron and carbon. In other embodiments, other elements may be present as impurities and in particular, they may be present as traces. 
     In some embodiments, the atomic ratio between boron and titanium may be between about 2.3:1 and about 1.2:1, more specifically between about 2.1:1 and about 1.4:1, and in particular between about 2.0 and about 1.5:1. 
     In some embodiments, the hard coating may comprise between about 2 and about 25 at % carbon, more specifically between about 4 and about 18 at % carbon, and in particular between about 5 and about 9 at % carbon. 
     In some embodiments, the hard coating may be composed of a single layer comprising titanium, boron and carbon. 
     In some embodiments, the hard coating may be composed of a plurality of sublayers, wherein a first set of sublayers comprises titanium and boron and a second set of sublayers comprises titanium and carbon. In some embodiments, the plurality of sublayers may form an alternating arrangement of layers comprising titanium carbide and layers comprising titanium boride. In some embodiments, the plurality of sublayers may comprise between about 3 and about 20 sublayers, more specifically between about 4 and about 15 sublayers, and in particular between about 6 and about 12 sublayers. 
     In some embodiments, the thickness of the hard coating may be between about 10 and about 500 nm, more specifically between about 50 and about 300 nm, and in particular between about 80 and about 250 nm. The thickness of the coating may be determined by measuring the thickness of the hard coating on the coated substrate edge. 
     In some embodiments, the adhesion-promoting first coating may comprise at least about 70 at %, more specifically at least about 80 at %, and in particular at least about 90 at %, of Ti, Cr, or TiC. 
     In some embodiments, the thickness of the adhesion-promoting coating may be between about 10 and about 100 nm, more specifically between about 10 and about 50 nm, and in particular between about 10 and about 35 nm. The thickness of the adhesion-promoting coating may be determined by measuring the thickness of the adhesion-promoting coating on first coated substrate edge. 
     In some embodiments, the ratio of thickness between the hard coating and the adhesion-promoting coating may be between about 20:1 to about 5:1, more specifically between about 14:1 to about 6:1, and in particular between about 12:1 to about 8:1. The thickness of the coating may be determined by measuring the thickness of the hard coating on the coated substrate edge. The thickness of the adhesion-promoting coating may be determined by measuring the thickness of the adhesion-promoting coating on first coated substrate edge. 
     In some embodiments, the cross-section of a blade&#39;s edge portion may have a substantially symmetrical tapering geometry terminating in a blade tip and the cross-section may have a central longitudinal axis originating from the blade tip. The blade&#39;s edge portion may have a thickness of between about 1.5 μm and about 2.4 μm measured at a distance of about 5 μm along the central longitudinal axis from the blade tip. 
     In a further aspect, the present disclosure is directed towards a razor cartridge comprising one or more razor blades as described in the above aspect. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS 
       Embodiments of the present disclosure are described herein with reference to the following figures. 
         FIG. 1  is a schematic drawing of a razor blade&#39;s edge portion in cross-sectional view. 
         FIGS. 2 a , 2 b , and 2 c    show representative XPS measurements of a hard coating containing titanium, boron and carbon. 
         FIG. 3  is a schematic drawing of a razor blade&#39;s edge portion in cross-sectional view which comprises an adhesion-promoting coating. 
     
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS 
     Hereinafter, a detailed description will be given of the present disclosure. The terms or words used in the description and the claims of the present disclosure are not to be construed limitedly as only having common-language or dictionary meanings and should, unless specifically defined otherwise in the following description, be interpreted as having their ordinary technical meaning as established in the relevant technical field. The detailed description will refer to specific embodiments and figures to better illustrate the present disclosure, however, it should be understood that the presented disclosure is not limited to these specific embodiments and the figures. The characteristics and advantages of the disclosure will readily appear from the following description of some of its embodiments, provided as non-limitative examples, and of the accompanying drawings. 
     In one aspect, the present disclosure is directed towards a razor blade for a hand-held razor. A razor blade is primarily composed of a stainless steel substrate which has undergone grinding to form an edge in the substrate. More specifically, the substrate is shaped such that it terminates in a substrate edge portion having substrate sides which converge towards a substrate edge. 
       FIG. 1  shows an exemplary representation of a substrate edge portion  10 . The substrate edge portion  10  has a continuously tapering geometry with two substrate sides  10   a ,  10   b  converging towards a substrate edge  10   c . The continuously tapering geometry of the cross-sectional shape of the substrate edge portion  10  can be straight, angular, arched or any combination thereof. Moreover, the cross-sectional shape may be symmetrical or asymmetrical with respect a central longitudinal axis.  FIG. 1  shows an exemplary cross-sectional shape of the substrate edge portion  10  which is symmetrical to the central longitudinal axis (not shown) and continuously tapering towards substrate edge  10   c  in a linear manner. 
     According to the present disclosure, at least the substrate edge  10   c  is provided with a hard coating  11  comprising the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. When referring to a substrate edge  10   c  which is provided with a hard coating  11 , it should be understood that such reference does not merely refer to the strict geometrical edge of the substrate body but rather to the edge in view of the cutting action it performs. Accordingly, the term substrate edge  10   c  is also meant to encompasses those parts of the substrate sides  10   a ,  10   b  which are immediately adjacent to the strict geometrical edge of the substrate edge portion  10 . In exemplary embodiments, the region forming the substrate edge  10   c  extends away from the strict geometric edge of the substrate edge portion along a central longitudinal axis of the substrate edge portion  10  for a distance of: 5 μm or less, 10 μm or less, 15 μm or less, 25 μm or less, 50 μm or less, 75 μm or less, 100 μm or less, 125 μm or less, 150 μm or less, 175 μm or less, or 200 μm or less. 
     As schematically shown in  FIG. 1 , the hard coating  11  may not only be provided on the substrate edge  10   c  but additionally also be provided on the substrate sides  10   a ,  10   b  of the substrate edge portion  10 . Extending the hard coating  11  to substrate sides  10   a ,  10   b  (or beyond) can be done on purpose to improve performance of the razor blade or it can be a by-product of the employed coating technology. The hard coating  11  may generally follow the surface and contour of the underlying substrate edge portion  10 . Accordingly, the hard coating  11  may form the blades edge  11   c , as shown in  FIG. 1 . However, it is not required that the hard coating  11  is in itself homogeneous, e.g. of homogeneous thickness and/or composition. The hard coating  11  comprises the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. When referring to the elements titanium, boron, and carbon, it should be understood that these elements can be present in any form, for instance in their elemental form or chemically bound in intermetallic phases, in particular in borides or carbides. When referring to hard coating, it should be understood that the coating as such may be harder than the coated substrate portion and/or that the coated substrate portion may be hardened in its entirety in comparison to an uncoated substrate portion. For the purposes of the present disclosure, any coating comprising the elements titanium, boron, and carbon may be considered as a hard coating  11 . However, it is also possible to determine the hardness of the hard coating  11  or hard coated substrate by using a nanoindenter as described in more detail in the Examples. 
     The method of determining the presence of the elements titanium, boron, and carbon in the hard coating  11  is not particularly limited. For instance, it is possible to detect these elements by chemical analysis of the blade edge using various common surface analysis methods such X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES) which can provide quantitative and qualitative information on these elements, respectively.  FIGS. 2 a  to 2 c    show exemplary results of an XPS measurement of a hard coating  11  containing titanium, boron, and carbon. As shown in  FIG. 2 a   , the presence of titanium may be determined by measuring for the presence of a titanium  2   p  XPS peak at about 454 eV. As shown in  FIG. 2 b   , the presence of boron may be determined by measuring for the presence of a boron  1   s  XPS peak at about 188 eV. As shown in  FIG. 2 c   , the presence of carbon may be determined by measuring for the presence of a carbon  1   s  XPS peak at about 283 eV. Of course, other characteristic XPS peaks may be used as well. 
     The substrate of the razor blade may comprise a stainless steel. The choice of stainless steel is not particularly limited. A particularly suitable stainless steel may comprise iron as main alloying element, and, in weight, about 0.3 to about 0.9% carbon, in particular about 0.49 to about 0.75% of carbon, about 10 to about 18% of chromium, in particular about 12.7 to about 14.5% of chromium, about 0.3 to about 1.4% of manganese, in particular about 0.45 to about 1.05% of manganese, about 0.1 to about 0.8% of silicon, in particular about 0.20 to about 0.65% of silicon, and about 0.6% to about 2.0% molybdenum, in particular about 0.85% to about 1.50% molybdenum. In some embodiments, the stainless steel may substantially consist of the above-cited elements and, in particular, may not contain more than about 3% by weight, in particular about 2% by weight, other elements. 
     In some embodiments, for instance as shown in  FIG. 1 , the hard coating  11  may be provided directly on the substrate edge portion  10 . In some embodiments, the hard coating  11  may be deposited onto the substrate edge portion  10 . 
     In some embodiments, it may be advantageous that the razor blade further comprises an adhesion-promoting coating to facilitate secure attachment of hard coating  11  to the substrate edge portion. In particular, in some embodiments, an adhesion-promoting coating is deposited at least onto the substrate edge  10   c  to provide a first coated substrate edge and the hard coating  11  comprising the elements titanium, boron, and carbon is deposited at least onto the first coated substrate edge. 
     An exemplary embodiment comprising an adhesion-promoting coating is shown in  FIG. 3 .  FIG. 3  shows an exemplary representation of substrate edge portion  20 . The substrate edge portion  20 , including the substrate edge itself, is coated with an adhesion-promoting coating  22 . The adhesion-promoting coating  22  is then coated with hard coating  21 . The adhesion-promoting coating  22  may not only be provided on the substrate edge  10   c  but additionally also be provided on the substrate sides  10   a ,  10   b  of the substrate edge portion  10 . 
     The type of adhesion-promoting coating  22  is not particularly limited. In some embodiments, the adhesion-promoting first coating  22  may comprise at least about 70 at %, more specifically at least about 80 at %, and in particular at least about 90 at %, of Ti, Cr, or TiC. 
     In some embodiments, the thickness of the adhesion-promoting coating  22  may be between about 10 and about 100 nm, more specifically between about 10 and about 50 nm, and in particular between about 10 and about 35 nm. 
     In some embodiments, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may comprise titanium carbides and titanium borides. In some embodiments, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may further comprise boron carbides. Such carbides and borides will typically form when depositing the elements titanium, boron, and carbon by thin-film deposition techniques such as Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD), Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD), and related techniques. In some embodiments, hard coating  11 ,  21  may comprise a TiB 2 -based matrix and carbon is dispersed within the matrix. In some embodiments, the dispersed carbon may form local bonds with titanium and boron, respectively. In some embodiments, the dispersed carbon may not form local bonds with titanium and boron, respectively. 
     While the hard coating  11 ,  21  may primarily comprise the elements titanium, boron, and carbide, it should be understood that the hard coating  11 ,  21  may contain other elements as well. Other elements may be present as impurities, may stem from ingress of elements from the blade substrate, or may be purposively added to fine-tune certain properties. In some embodiments, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may comprise at least about 70 at %, more specifically at least about 80 at %, and in particular at least about 90 at %, of the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. In particular, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may comprise between 90 at % and 100 at % of the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. More specifically, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may comprise at least 95 at % of the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. Therefore, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may comprise between 95 at % and 100 at % of the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. More specifically, in some embodiments the hard coating may consist of essentially the elements titanium, boron and carbon. In other embodiments, other elements may be present as impurities and in particular, they may be present as traces. 
     In some embodiments, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may further comprise a lubricating phase, such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ). These coating additives may provide a lower friction coefficient and may be co-sputtered with the hard coating  11 ,  21 . This way, the lubricating phase may be provided to the entire coating volume, reducing the friction coefficient and maintaining the hardness of the razor blade in high level even after initial surface abrasion. In addition, the cutting forces incurred by a razor blade bearing a multi-phase coating may be reduced during shaving, compared to the cutting forces incurred by a razor blade bearing the same coating but absent the lubricating phase. 
     While hard coatings  11 ,  21  comprising titanium, boron and carbon generally have improved wear resistance due to a very suitable combination of hardness, fracture toughness to inhibit fracture initiation and propagation and resistance against compressive stresses to inhibit fracture propagation, the present inventors have surprisingly also found that suitably adjusting the atomic ratio of titanium, boron and carbon further improves the wear resistance of the razor blade. 
     Accordingly, in some embodiments, the atomic ratio between boron and titanium may be between about 2.3:1 and about 1.2:1. The method of determining said atomic ratio is not particularly limited and can, for instance, be done by Energy Dispersive X-rays (EDX), X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS), Auger Electron Spectroscopy (AES), X-ray Fluorescence (XRF), and Secondary-ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). In some embodiments, it may be advantageous that the atomic ratio between boron and titanium is between about 2.3 and about 1.2:1, more specifically between about 2.1 and about 1.4:1, and in particular between about 2.0 and about 1.5:1. 
     In some embodiments, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may comprise between about 2 and about 25 at % carbon. The method of determining the amount of carbon in the coating is not particularly limited and can be done by the same methods as outlined above for the atomic ratio between boron and titanium. In some embodiments, it may be advantageous that the hard coating  11 ,  21  comprises between about 4 and about 18 at % carbon, more specifically between about 4.5 and about 14 at % carbon, and in particular between about 5 and about 9 at % carbon. 
     In some embodiments, it may be advantageous that the atomic ratio between boron and titanium in the hard coating  11 ,  21  is between about 2.1 and about 1.4:1 and that hard coating  11 ,  21  comprises between about 4 and about 18 at % carbon. 
     In some embodiments, it may be advantageous that the atomic ratio between boron and titanium in the hard coating  11 ,  21  is between about 2.1 and about 1.4:1 and that hard coating  11 ,  21  comprises about 4.5 and about 14 at % carbon, and in particular between about 5 and about 9 at % carbon. 
     In some embodiments, it may be advantageous that the atomic ratio between boron and titanium in the hard coating  11 ,  21  is between about 1.9 and about 1.4:1, and in particular between about 2.0 and about 1.5:1 and that hard coating  11 ,  21  comprises between about 4 and about 18 at % carbon. 
     In some embodiments, it may be advantageous that the atomic ratio between boron and titanium in the hard coating  11 ,  21  is between about 1.9 and about 1.4:1, and in particular between about 2.0 and about 1.5:1; that hard coating  11 ,  21  comprises about 4.5 and about 14 at % carbon, and in particular between about 5 and about 9 at % carbon; and that the hard coating  11 ,  21  comprises at least about 70 at %, more specifically at least about 80 at %, and in particular at least about 90 at %, of the elements titanium, boron, and carbon. 
     The deposition methods which are suitable for depositing hard coatings  11 ,  21  allow numerous designs of the hard coating  11 ,  21 . Accordingly, in some embodiments, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may be composed of a single layer comprising titanium, boron and carbon. In some embodiments, the hard coating  11 ,  21  may be composed of a plurality of sublayers, wherein a first set of sublayers comprises titanium and boron and a second set of sublayers comprises titanium and carbon. In some embodiments, the plurality of sublayers may form an alternating arrangement of layers comprising titanium carbide and layers comprising titanium boride. In some embodiments, the plurality of sublayers may comprise between about 3 and about 20 sublayers, more specifically between about 4 and about 15 sublayers, and in particular between about 6 and about 12 sublayers. In some embodiments, sublayers comprising titanium carbide may have a thickness of about 1 to about 4 nm, in particular about 2 to about 3 nm, and sublayers comprising titanium boride may have a thickness of about 0.5 to about 2 nm, in particular about 0.8 to about 1.3 nm. 
     In some embodiments, the thickness of the hard coating  11 ,  21  may be between about 10 and about 500 nm, more specifically between about 50 and about 300 nm, and in particular between about 80 and about 250 nm. 
     In some embodiments, the ratio of thickness between the hard coating  11 ,  21  and the adhesion-promoting coating  22  may be between about 20:1 to about 5:1, more specifically between about 14:1 to about 6:1, and in particular between about 12:1 to about 8:1. 
     The razor blade may further comprise additional coatings. In one embodiment, the razor blade further comprises an outer layer which is provided on the hard coating  11 ,  21 . The outer layer may be a lubricating layer, which may comprise a fluoropolymer, in particular polytetrafluoro ethylene (PTFE). The lubricating layer serves to reduce friction during shaving. In other embodiments, other hydrophilic coatings such as silicon-based lubricants, e.g. polydimethyl siloxane (PDMS) or lubricating coatings comprising polyethylene glycol (PEG) may also be applied to provide a lubricating effect. In another embodiment, the razor blade further comprises a chromium-containing top coating that is provided on the hard coating  16 . In case that both a chromium-containing top coating and a lubricating layer is used, the lubricating layer is provided over the chromium-containing top coating whereas the chromium-containing top coating is provided over the hard coating  11 ,  21 . 
     As explained above, the improved wear resistance due to a very suitable combination of hardness, fracture toughness and resistance against compressive stresses makes hard coatings  11 ,  21  particularly suitable for relatively thin blade edge designs. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the cross-section of the razor blade&#39;s edge portion may have a substantially symmetrical tapering geometry terminating in a blade tip, wherein the cross-section has a central longitudinal axis originating from the blade tip, and wherein the blade&#39;s edge portion has a thickness of between about 1.5 μm and about 2.4 μm, in particular about 1.57 to about 2.35 μm, measured at a distance of about 5 μm along the central longitudinal axis from the blade tip. In some embodiments, the blade&#39;s edge portion has a thickness of between about 4.6 μm and about 6.8 μm, in particular about 4.62 to about 6.74 μm, measured at a distance of about 20 μm along the central longitudinal axis from the blade tip. In some embodiments, the blade&#39;s edge portion has a thickness of between about 10.3 μm and 14.4 μm, in particular about 10.32 to about 14.35 μm, measured at a distance of about 50 μm along the central longitudinal axis from the blade tip. In some embodiments, the blade&#39;s edge portion has a thickness of between about 19.8 μm and 27.6 μm, in particular about 19.82 to about 27.52 Linn, measured at a distance of about 100 μm along the central longitudinal axis from the blade tip. 
     The above-described razor blades can be manufactured by any suitable means. More specifically, the preparation and grinding of the blade substrate can be performed by any suitable means, for instance as disclosed in US 2017/136641 A1 which is incorporated by reference in its entirety. 
     The coatings may also be applied by any suitable means. Both the hard coating  16  and the adhesion promoting coating  18  may be deposited by using thin film deposition technologies such as Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD) and Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD), respectively. In particular, in the family of PVD technologies, DC Sputtering, RF Sputtering, Closed Field Unbalanced Magnetron Sputtering (CFUMS), Ion Beam Sputtering, Cathodic Arc Deposition, and High-Power Impulse Magnetron Sputtering (HiPIMS) may be utilized using sintered TiBC targets in an Ar atmosphere. It is also possible to provide the hard coating  16  by co-sputtering of TiB 2  and TiC sintered targets in an Ar atmosphere or TiB 2  and C targets in an Ar atmosphere. Hard coatings  16  can also be deposited using a TiB 2  coating in Ar/CH 4  atmosphere. Examples of a CVD technology for producing hard coating  16  include Low Pressure CVD (LPCVD), Atmospheric Pressure CVD (APCVD), Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD), and Metalorganic CVD (MOCVD) using precursors. An exemplary deposition process is described in US 2018/215056 A1 and U.S. Pat. No. 10,442,098 B2, both of which are incorporated by reference in their entirety. In some cases, it may be that the method selected for depositing the hard coating  11 ,  21  may introduce some statistical variability to the chemical composition of the hard coating  11 ,  21  in an industrial mass-production setting. Therefore, in some embodiments, it may be advantageous that the atomic percentages and ratios indicated elsewhere in this specification are referring to the average determined from multiple measurements, for instance the average of 5 measurements. 
     The outer coating such as a lubricating coating may also be applied by any suitable means. Manufacturing methods are well-known to the skilled person. 
     In a further aspect, the present disclosure is directed towards a razor cartridge comprising one or more razor blades as described in the above aspect. 
     In the following, an exemplary method of preparing a razor blade coating according to the first aspect of the disclosure will be described in more detail: 
     After loading the blade bayonets on the rotating fixture of a depositing chamber, the chamber is evacuated up to a base pressure of 10 −5  Torr. Then Ar gas is inserted into the chamber up to a pressure of 8 mTorr (8×10 −3  Torr). Rotation of the blade bayonets begins at a constant speed of 6 rpm and the targets are operated under DC current control at 0.2 Amps. A DC voltage of 200-600 V is applied on the stainless steel blades for 4 minutes in order to perform a sputter etching step. In another embodiment, a Pulsed DC voltage of 100-600 V may be applied on the stainless steel blades for 4 minutes to perform a sputter etching step. 
     Next, the deposition of an adhesion-promoting interlayer takes place after the end of sputter etching step, with the chamber pressure being adjusted to 3 mTorr. The interlayer target is operated under DC current control at 3-10 Amps while a DC voltage of 0-100 V is applied on the rotating blades. Adjusting the deposition time, an interlayer of 5-50 nm is deposited prior to depositing the hard coating layer. In another embodiment, a Pulsed DC voltage of 0-100V may be applied during the deposition of the interlayer. 
     After deposition of the interlayer, a TiBC compound film is deposited on top of it forming the hard coating. TiB 2  and C targets are operated simultaneously. The relative amount of deposited C can be controlled by varying the C target current from e.g. 1 Amp to 7 Amps while keeping the TiB 2  target(s) current constant. During the deposition a DC bias voltage of 0 to −600 V is applied on the rotating blades. 
     Finally, on top of the hard coating layer, a Cr top layer may be deposited with the current on the Cr target(s) at 3 Amps and a bias voltage of 0-450 V. 
     As explained above, in some embodiments any of the hard coating  11 ,  21  or the adhesion-promoting coating  22  may not only be provided on the substrate edge  10   c  but additionally also be provided on the substrate sides  10   a ,  10   b  of the substrate edge portion  10 . 
     The disclosure is further illustrated herein by the following non-limiting examples. 
     Examples 
     Following the above-outlined manufacturing procedure, TiBC hard coatings of varying compositions (Examples 1 to 5) were deposited on stainless steel blade substrates. The relative composition of the TiBC hard coating was changed by varying the C target current while the TiB 2  target(s) current was kept constant. All other parameters and conditions remained unchanged. During the deposition a DC bias voltage of 0 to −600 V is applied on the rotating blades. The obtained chemical compositions of the obtained hard coatings were analyzed by XPS. The results are shown in below table 1: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Example 
                 [Ti] in at % 
                 [B] in at % 
                 [B]/[Ti] 
                 [C] in at % 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                 Comparative 
                 not tested 
                 not tested 
                 — 
                 not tested 
               
               
                 Example 
               
               
                 Example 1 
                 32.5 
                 59.6 
                 1.84 
                 2.4 
               
               
                 Example 2 
                 30.6 
                 58.7 
                 1.92 
                 5.5 
               
               
                 Example 3 
                 30.2 
                 56.3 
                 1.86 
                 8.1 
               
               
                 Example 4 
                 28.9 
                 48.5 
                 1.67 
                 17.2 
               
               
                 Example 5 
                 27.8 
                 42.9 
                 1.54 
                 21.2 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Thus, modulating the C target current yielded co-sputtered TiB 2 /C-hard coatings comprising the concentrations of C: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
             
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
               
                   
               
               
                   
                 Carbon target current 
                 C concentration 
               
               
                 Example 
                 (Amps) 
                 (at %) 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                 Comparative Example 
                 0 
                 0 
               
               
                 Example 1 
                 0.3 
                 2.4 
               
               
                 Example 2 
                 1 
                 5.5 
               
               
                 Example 3 
                 2 
                 8.1 
               
               
                 Example 4 
                 5 
                 17.2 
               
               
                 Example 5 
                 7 
                 21.2 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Nanoindentation tests were performed on representative samples of TiBC hard coatings which were obtained using the above-specified process parameters. Briefly summarized, the nanoindentation test was performed as follows: During the nanoindentation process, a hard tip whose properties (mechanical properties, geometry, tip radius etc.) are known, penetrates the hard coating sample to be analyzed. In the present case a Berkovich tip was used for the indentation tests. The load enforced on the indenter tip was increased as the tip penetrated further into the specimen until penetration depth of 50-100 nm was reached. At this point, the load was held constant for a period of time and then the indenter was removed. The area of the residual indentation in the sample was measured. The hardness H is defined as the maximum load P max  divided by the residual indentation area A: 
     
       
         
           
             H 
             = 
             
               
                 P 
                  
                 
                     
                 
                  
                 max 
               
               A 
             
           
         
       
     
     The following results were obtained: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                 TABLE 3 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 C concentration 
                 Hardness 
               
               
                   
                 Example 
                 (at %) 
                 (GPa) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Comparative Example 
                 0 
                 15.13 
               
               
                   
                 Example 1 
                 2.4 
                 15.69 
               
               
                   
                 Example 2 
                 5.5 
                 17.14 
               
               
                   
                 Example 3 
                 8.1 
                 17.75 
               
               
                   
                 Example 4 
                 17.2 
                 17.15 
               
               
                   
                 Example 5 
                 21.2 
                 16.94 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     As can be seen from above table 3, a hard coating comprising Ti and B provides a hardness of 15.13 GPa (Comparative Example). If carbon is dispersed in the TiB 2  matrix, the hardness is improved in all cases (Comparative Example vs. Examples 1 to 5). Moreover, it was surprisingly found that the hardness does not vary linearly with the amount of carbon dispersed in the TiB 2  matrix but, rather, has an optimum at specific C concentrations (Examples 2, 3, and 4). Furthermore, the blade edge degradation of razor blades coated with TiBC hard coatings was evaluated. In particular, razor blades prepared as described for the Comparative Example having a conventional TiB 2  hard coating where compared to razor blades prepared as described for the best-performing Example 3 and Example 4 having TiBC hard coatings. The evaluation was carried out as follows: 
     10 blades per sample lot were subjected to 20 consecutive cuts on a moving felt using a load cell for measuring the load on the blade in the cutting action. It was found that the load ranges for the last 20 th  cuts of the TiBC-coated blades were at least equal with the load of blades having the comparative TiB 2  hard coating. This indicated that the blades with the TiBC coating preserve their cutting ability (i.e. shape and integrity) during the cutting action. Additionally, the damage imposed on the blade edge after 20 cuts during the above-described test was evaluated with the aid of an optical microscope. The damage on the blade edge was quantified in terms of area of missing material, i.e. material that has been broken and removed from the edge. The results are reported in the below table 4. 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
             
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
               
                   
               
               
                   
                 Force at 20th 
                 Missing Area 
                 Missing Length 
               
               
                 Example 
                 cut (Kg) 
                 (μm 2 ) 
                 (μm) 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Comparative Example 
                 2.65 
                 3265 
                 1333 
               
               
                 Example 3 
                 2.67 
                 2826 
                 1202 
               
               
                 Example 4 
                 2.59 
                 1700 
                 745 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The TiBC coated blades of Examples 3 and 4 demonstrated an up to about 50% decrease of the missing material area as compared to blades with the TiB 2  coating of the Comparative Example. Likewise, the missing lengths of the blade edge was substantially improved. The above shows that coating razor edges with TiBC coatings improves the wear resistance and resistance against degradation during use. 
     Although the embodiments of the present disclosure have been disclosed for illustrative purposes, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications and alterations are possible, without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure. It is also to be understood that such modifications and alterations are incorporated in the scope of the present disclosure and the accompanying claims.