Patent Publication Number: US-2015079997-A1

Title: Automated triggers for application of cell association bias and/or interference mitigation techniques

Description:
BACKGROUND 
     This application is a divisional application of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/210,148, filed Aug. 15, 2011, the contents of which are fully incorporated herein by reference. 
    
    
     The present inventive subject matter relates generally to the art of mobile telecommunications systems. Particular but not exclusive relevance is found in connection with heterogeneous LTE (Long Term Evolution) networks, e.g., as proposed by 3GPP (the 3 rd  Generation Partnership Project), and accordingly the present specification makes specific reference thereto. It is to be appreciated however that aspects of the present inventive subject matter are also equally amenable to other like applications. 
     Heterogeneous LTE networks are generally known in the art of cellular and/or mobile telecommunications. In one deployment strategy, some cells can be located in or near the coverage area of other cells. Neighboring cells will at times operate in the same frequency spectrum, at least partially. This can lead to interference problems which are typically desirable to mitigate. Additionally, there is generally a desire to load balance traffic among the cells, optimize throughput and improve network performance. 
     Accordingly, new and/or improved processes and/or network elements are disclosed herein which address one or more of the above-referenced concerns(s) and/or others. 
     SUMMARY 
     This summary is provided to introduce concepts related to the present inventive subject matter. This summary is not intended to identify essential features of the claimed subject matter nor is it intended for use in determining or limiting the scope of the claimed subject matter. 
     In accordance with one embodiment, a wireless telecommunications network is provided. The network includes: a macro cell having a first coverage area; and at least one metro cell having a second coverage area, the metro cell being located within the first coverage area of the macro cell. Suitably, the macro cell is configured to: determine whether or not the macro cell is congested; determine whether or not the metro cell is uncongested; and, if it is determined the macro cell is congested and that the metro cell is uncongested, then the macro cell determines that an attempted application of Cell Association Bias (CAB) for the metro cell is warranted. 
     In accordance with another embodiment, a first base station is provided in a wireless telecommunications network. The first base station defines a first cell having a coverage area and the network includes at least one second base station defining a second cell at least partially within the coverage area of the first cell. The first base station is suitably provisioned to execute a method including: determining whether or not the first cell is congested; determining whether or not the second cell is uncongested; and, if it is determined the first cell is congested and that the second cell is uncongested, then determining that an attempted application of CAB for the second cell is warranted. 
     In accordance with another embodiment, in a wireless telecommunications network comprising a first base station defining a first cell having a coverage area, a second base station is provided. Suitably, the second base station defines a second cell located at least partially within the coverage area of the first cell, and the second base station is provisioned to execute a method including: determining that a portion of a load being carried by the second base station is coming from one or more mobile UEs located proximate to an outer edge of the second cell, such that not all the UEs so located can be scheduled in available subframes during which the first base station may be blanking; in response to the determining, sending a request to the first base station for increasing the number of subframes during which the first base station blanks; and receiving a response from the first base station to the request, the response indicating a grant of the request and identifying in which subframes the first base station will blank. 
     Numerous advantages and benefits of the inventive subject matter disclosed herein will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading and understanding the present specification. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING(S) 
       The following detailed description makes reference to the figures in the accompanying drawings. However, the inventive subject matter disclosed herein may take form in various components and arrangements of components, and in various steps and arrangements of steps. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating exemplary and/or preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting. Further, it is to be appreciated that the drawings may not be to scale. 
         FIG. 1  is a diagrammatic illustration showing at least a portion of an exemplary telecommunications network suitable for practicing aspect of the present inventive subject matter. 
         FIG. 2  is a flow chart illustrating an exemplary process executed by a macro cell and/or its base station in accordance with aspect of the present inventive subject matter. 
         FIG. 3  is a flow chart illustrating another exemplary process executed by a macro cell and/or its base station in accordance with aspects of the present inventive subject matter. 
         FIG. 4  is a flow chart illustrating yet another exemplary process executed within the network illustrated in  FIG. 1 , in accordance with aspects of the present inventive subject matter. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENT(S) 
     For clarity and simplicity, the present specification shall refer to structural and/or functional elements, relevant standards and/or protocols, and other components that are commonly known in the art without further detailed explanation as to their configuration or operation except to the extent they have been modified or altered in accordance with and/or to accommodate the preferred embodiment(s) presented herein. 
     With reference now to  FIG. 1 , there is shown a portion of a cellular telecommunications network, e.g., a heterogeneous LTE network. In particular, as shown, the network includes a first larger or macro cell  10  and a plurality of smaller or metro cells deployed within the coverage area of the macro cell  10 . As shown, there are three metro cells  20   a,    20   b  and  20   c  deployed within the coverage area of the macro cell  10 . However, in practice, there may be more or fewer similarly situated metro cells. Likewise, the overall network may include a greater number of similarly arranged macro cells. 
     Generally, each cell is supported by a base station (BS), e.g., an eNB (eNodeB or evolved Node B), that selectively communicates with one or more mobile stations or UEs (user equipment) which are generally within a coverage area of the cell, e.g., via a wireless RF (radio frequency) interface or other like over-the-air (OTA) interface. Suitably, the macro cell and the metro cells operate at least partially within the same frequency spectrum. The nominal coverage area or RF footprint of each cell is generally determined in part by the transmission power of the associated BS. As shown, the macro cell  10  is supported by a BS  12 , and the metro cells  20   a,    20   b  and  20   c  are supported by BS  22   a,    22   b  and  22   c,  respectively. Suitably, the metro cells may be, e.g., microcells, picocells, femtocells or the like or some combination thereof. In any event, the transmission power of each metro cell&#39;s BS is generally less than the transmission power of the macro cell&#39;s BS, and hence the relative sizes or nominal coverage areas of the cells are thusly reflected in  FIG. 1 . 
     As can be appreciated, the deployment strategy illustrated in  FIG. 1  allows UEs close to or within a metro cell&#39;s coverage area to connect to and/or access the network through the metro cell and thereby experience greater throughput and/or signal strength than they might otherwise enjoy from the surrounding macro cell  10 . One technique for increasing total network throughput, load balancing and/or improving network performance is to artificially extend the perceived range of a metro cell from the perspective of UEs and hence encourage the UEs to access the network through the metro cell when they would otherwise normally choose to access the network through the macro cell. This technique is referred to as range extension, achieved through the application of cell association bias (CAB), and CAB can be selectively implemented, i.e., turned on and/or off as desired by a network operator. When CAB is turned on, it can result in the effective offloading of UEs (and their respective traffic) from the macro cell onto particular metro cells. 
     To select which cell it will use to access the network, a UE will normally measure the strength of a received signal from one or more BS and select the cell which has the strongest signal. However, when CAB is applied, the macro cell  10  (or more specifically the BS  12 ) signals or otherwise instructs the UEs to add a delta value (or bias amount) to the measured signal strength, e.g., of one of the metro cells. In this way, the UEs will perceive the signal strength of the metro cell as being greater than its actual measured value. In turn, this will cause some UEs at or near an outer edge of the metro cell&#39;s coverage area to favor selection of the metro cell over the macro cell. To illustrate, consider a UE  30  just outside an outer edge of the nominal coverage area of the metro cell  20   a  where the actual measured signal strength from the macro cell  10  is somewhat greater than the actual measured signal strength from the metro cell  20   a.  Nevertheless, when CAB is turned on in this example, provided the measured signal strength from the metro cell  20   a  plus the delta value is greater than the measured signal strength from the macro cell  10 , then the UE  30  will select the metro cell  20   a  as opposed to the macro cell  10  which it would have otherwise selected absent the application of CAB. In this way, from at least the perspective of the UE  30 , the range of the metro cell  20   a  is artificially extended (i.e., without actually increasing the transmission strength of its BS  22   a ). Of course, depending on the bias amount or delta value, the perceived effective range of the metro cell  20   a  can be artificially extended more or less. As illustrated, the artificially expanded coverage area  20   a ′ in this example encompasses the UE  30  and hence the UE&#39;s preference for connecting to the network through the metro cell  20   a  over the macro cell  10 . 
     One condition that can arise when the macro cell and metro cells operate in the same frequency spectrum, particularly for UEs located at or near the outer edge of a metro cell&#39;s coverage area, is that UEs otherwise connected to the metro call may experience problematic interference from the macro cell. Employing CAB can further aggravate this condition by urging more UEs at or near the outer edge of the metro cell&#39;s coverage area to connect to the network through the metro cell as opposed to through the macro cell. 
     To mitigate the aforementioned interference problem, a feature referred to as enhanced inter cell interference coordination (eICIC) has been defined in 3GPP standards that enables two neighboring BS or cells to coordinate their transmissions during specific slices of time, referred to as subframes. In this context, “neighboring” BS or cells refers to BS or cells that handover UE from one to another. To provide eICIC, a technique referred to as almost blank subframes (ABS) can be employed. When ABS is employed, the macro cell  10  (or more specifically its BS  12 ) will intermittently or periodically blank during given subframes. That is to say, when blanking, the macro cell or its BS will essentially send no information or data (although some pilot and broadcast signals may be transmitted). Conversely, a neighboring metro cell which is synchronized with the macro cell can use those same subframes when the macro cell is blanked to serve UEs that are in high interference conditions, e.g., those UEs at or near an outer edge of the metro cell&#39;s coverage area. Suitably, as a greater number of UEs connecting to the network through a metro cell experience high interference conditions, a greater amount of ABS is applied. That is to say, the macro cell blanks at a greater frequency to allow more time or more blank subframes for the metro cell to serve the increased number of UEs experiencing high interference conditions. Conversely, as fewer UEs connecting to the network through the metro cell experience high interference conditions, less ABS is applied, i.e., the macro cell blanks at a lower frequency or less often, thereby maximizing the number of subframes during which the macro cell may transmit. 
     As with CAB, the use of ABS to achieve eICIC is selectively implemented, i.e., turned on and/or off as desired by a network operator. Conventionally, both CAB and eICIC via ABS were implemented manually by the network operator. That is to say, conventionally, the features had to be either turned on or turned off by specific intervention of the network operator. The manual implementation of these features can be a considerable burden to network operators. Moreover, there has been conventionally no automated mechanism for calculating or otherwise determining how much bias (i.e., how large a delta value) to apply in connection with the CAB technique to achieve the desired load balancing and/or beneficial network performance, nor was there a mechanism for notifying other metro cells when and/or where CAB was being implemented. Furthermore, while generally effective for their intended purposes, the continual use of these features can be undesirable. For example, it may be undesirable to utilize CAB with respect to a given metro cell when that metro cell is already heavily congested with UEs and/or the macro cell has plenty of available bandwidth. In another example, it may be undesirable to continually employ ABS insomuch as blanking subframes can reduce the overall throughput of the macro cell which has substantially limited or no transmission rights during the blanked subframes. In short, there have been previously no suitable mechanisms for determining if and/or when to implement either CAB or eICIC via ABS, nor has there been previously a suitable mechanism for determining how much CAB to apply or how much ABS to apply. Moreover, there have not been previously suitable mechanisms for communicating among the respectively cells if, when, where and/or how much ABS and/or CAB were being applied, nor has there previously been a suitable mechanism for a metro cell to trigger a request to the macro cell that ABS be implemented or inform the macro cell how much ABS is desired by the metro cell. 
     Accordingly, in a suitable embodiment, the macro cell  10  (or more specifically its BS  12 ) is configured and/or otherwise provisioned to calculate and/or otherwise determine if and/or when to apply CAB for one or more of the metro cells in order to benefit network performance. Suitably, this mechanism and/or process takes into consideration not only the conditions being experienced at and/or the state of the macro cell, but also the conditions being experienced at and/or the state of the metro cell at issue. 
     With reference now to  FIG. 2 , there is shown an exemplary process  100  carried out by the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  which determines if and/or when to apply CAB to a given metro cell. 
     In step  102 , the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  discovers which of its neighboring cells are metro cells. In one embodiment, the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  may be configured or otherwise provisioned with this information, e.g., in a suitable memory or database or the like. Alternately, the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  may learn this information otherwise. For example, when a request to handover a UE from a neighboring cell is received by the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12 , the handover request will generally report to the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  the transmission power or the like of the corresponding neighboring cell. Accordingly, from an examination of reported transmission power it can be determined if the neighboring cell is a metro cell. More specifically, a relatively small reported transmission power would indicate that the neighboring cell from which the corresponding handover was being requested is a metro cell. 
     At decision step  104 , it is then determined if the macro cell  10  is in a congested state. For example, the macro cell  10  may be deemed to be in a congested state if the offered traffic at the macro cell  10  is more than or within some threshold range of the maximum air interface capacity of the macro cell  10 , or if the macro cell is operating with or sufficiently near the maximum number of UEs that the macro cell  10  can support to access the network therethrough. If the macro cell  10  is not in a congested state, then no action may be taken and the process  100  can end, e.g., at step  106 . Otherwise, if the macro is in a congested state, then it may be desirable to offload one or more UEs to one or more of the overlapping metro cells, e.g., metro cells  20   a,    20   b  and/or  20   c.  Accordingly, the process  100  may continue to decision step  108  where it is determined if one or more of the metro cells is in an uncongested state and hence has sufficient capacity to receive additional UEs and/or the traffic associated therewith. For example, a given metro cell may be deemed to be in an uncongested state if the offered traffic at the metro cell is sufficiently less than or below some threshold amount of the maximum air interface capacity of the metro cell, or if the metro cell is operating with sufficiently less than the maximum number of UEs that the metro cell can support to access the network therethrough. Again, if no metro cell is deemed to be uncongested, then no action may be taken and the process  100  can end, e.g., at step  106 . Otherwise, if one or more metro cells are in an uncongested state, then it may remain desirable to offload one or more UEs to one or more of the uncongested metro cells, e.g., metro cells  20   a,    20   b  and/or  20   c.  Accordingly, the process  100  may continue to step  110  insomuch as it has been decided that the application of CAB to one or more of the uncongested metro cells will potentially benefit network throughput and/or performance, that is provided a suitable amount of bias can be applied to result in actually offloading one or more UEs from the macro cell to one or more of the metro cells having the capacity to receive the UEs. 
     With reference now to  FIG. 3 , having concluded that an attempt to apply CAB to one or more of the metro cells may benefit network throughput and/or performance, the macro cell  10  may be further configured and/or provisioned to carry out the process  200  wherein, among other things, the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  calculates and/or otherwise determines if in fact a feasible application of CAB to one or more of the metro cells will suitably achieve the desired objective (i.e., the offloading of UEs from the macro cell to one or more of the metro cells) and if so what is the desired amount of bias to apply. As will be appreciated from a further reading of the present specification, determining the amount of bias to apply can be achieved with an iterative approach in which the bias is gradually increased until a desired steady state is ready. 
     As shown in  FIG. 3 , the process  200  begins at step  210  with the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  determining whether or not there are UEs in a border condition with respect to the metro cells (i.e., whether or not there are UEs at or near an outer edge of a metro cell&#39;s coverage area). For example, to do this, a number of sub-steps may be executed or otherwise carried out by the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12 . 
     In a suitable embodiment, at sub-step  212  the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  may: (i) request RRC (Radio Resource Control) measurements from the UEs being served by the macro cell  10 , including the RSRP (Reference Signal Receive Power) of the strongest neighboring metro cell (i.e., the metro cell having the strongest RSRP for a given UE) and the RSRP of the serving macro cell  10 ; and, (ii) then calculate or otherwise determine the difference between the obtained RSRPs in each case. 
     At sub-step  214 , the process  200  continues with the metro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  selecting a metro cell. To start, the selected metro cell may be the one having the highest number of UEs reporting it as the strongest neighbor. At sub-step  216 , an initial bias amount is set or otherwise selected for application of CAB to the selected metro cell, e.g., by the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12 . The initially selected bias amount is generally the amount that will induce one or more of the UEs being served by the macro cell  10 , but otherwise in a border condition with respect to the selected metro cell, to be handed over to the selected metro cell. For example, the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  may select or otherwise set the initial bias amount to be slightly larger than the smallest RSRP difference calculated or otherwise determined from the RRC measurements reported to the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  from all the UEs in a border condition with respect to the selected metro cell. 
     At decision sub-step  218 , the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  decides whether to actually apply CAB to the selected metro call based on the determined initial bias from sub-step  216 . If the initial bias amount is larger than a maximum which can be supported, then no action may be taken and the process  200  may end at step  220  since in this case the artificial extension of the metro cell&#39;s coverage area will not help capture any UEs—i.e., no UEs will be induced to hand over from the macro cell to the metro cell, e.g., because all the UEs still reside outside even the artificially extended coverage area of the metro cell. Suitably, the maximum bias amount which can be supported is taken as the difference between the transmission power of the macro cell&#39;s BS  12  (e.g., in dBm) and the transmission power of the selected metro cell&#39;s BS (e.g., in dBm). Otherwise, if the initial bias amount is substantially equal to or smaller than the maximum which can be supported, then at step  222  CAB is applied for the selected metro cell by the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  using the initial bias determined in sub-step  216  as the delta value. Additionally, at step  222  eICIC may be applied using ABS with an initial number of blanked subframes at the macro cell  10  sufficient to allow the metro cell to serve the additional handed over UEs during those subframes that are blanked for the macro cell  10 . 
     Suitably, at step  224 , the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  signals or otherwise informs one or more of its neighboring metro cells and/or their respective BS about the application of CAB and/or implementation of eICIC using ABS. In one exemplary embodiment, all the neighboring metro cells are provided the eICIC and/or ABS information from the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12 . Suitably, the macro cell informs all of the neighboring metro cells that ABS has been turned on, and in what subframes the macro cell will blank. For example, this may be done by sending a “Load Information” X2 message from the macro cell to all the metro cells. Suitably, this message can contain the ABS Information IE (information element). 
     When CAB has been applied by the macro cell  10  for a particular metro cell, suitably the macro cell will inform the metro cell, via signaling, sending a message or otherwise, that the bias is in effect so that the metro cell will update its mobility parameters in response. In this way, futile attempts to handover UEs from the metro call back to the macro cell can be avoided. For example, there are two ways the metro cell can be made aware of the application of CAB. In one way, the macro cell can directly inform the metro cell, e.g., using an X2 interface and a message such as the “Mobility Change Request” message or the “Load Information” message. In another way, the metro cell can observe that based on rejected handover requests from the metro cell to the macro cell that a certain amount of bias is being added to the handover thresholds on the macro cell side. In particular, based on the measurement levels that had been reported by the UE in advance of the failed handover attempt, the metro cell determines how much bias has been set by the macro cell, and this value is optionally refined as more measurements and failed handovers are reported. 
     Suitably, at step  226 , the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  may re-evaluate and can iteratively carry out further of the above described process steps as may be desired to make additional network performance improvements. 
     In any event, it is to be appreciated that in connection with the particular exemplary embodiment(s) presented herein certain structural and/or function features are described as being incorporated in defined elements and/or components. However, it is contemplated that these features may, to the same or similar benefit, also likewise be incorporated in other elements and/or components where appropriate. It is also to be appreciated that different aspects of the exemplary embodiments may be selectively employed as appropriate to achieve other alternate embodiments suited for desired applications, the other alternate embodiments thereby realizing the respective advantages of the aspects incorporated therein. For example, after a first iteration of the foregoing processes and/or steps, some UEs will be re-associated and/or handed over from the macro cell to one or more of the metro cells. However, the macro cell may still be congested and there may still be one or more metro cells that are uncongested, e.g., as determined from re-executing the process  100 . In this case, the macro may decide to apply CAB to all its neighboring metro cells with the previously determined bias, or it may consider each metro cell on a case by case basis. In the latter situation, the process may return to step  214  where the macro cell will choose the next metro cell, e.g., metro cell having the next largest number of UEs reporting it as the strongest neighbor. The process  200  may then be carried out from there with respect to the newly chosen metro cell. This cycle is optionally repeated until all the metro cells have been addressed and CAB has been applied as appropriate. Notably, additional blanking may not be applied in each instance as the metro cells may share the same subframes in which the macro cell is blanked for serving the UEs in high interference conditions insomuch as generally the metro cells will not interfere with each other. 
     Once CAB has been applied for all applicable metro cells at the initial bias level, then if the macro cell is still congested, the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  may iteratively increase the bias amount in stepwise fashion, and re-evaluate if additional blanking by the macro cell is to be implemented in order to serve the additional UEs being re-associated and/or otherwise handed over to the metro cells. Suitably, these iterative procedures are continued until either (i) the macro cell is no longer congested, or (ii) there is no suitably uncongested metro cell left, or (iii) the maximum supportable bias amount is being used. 
     With reference now to  FIG. 4 , there is shown a process  300  optionally carried out or otherwise executed by a metro cell and/or the macro cell as appropriate. In this case, the metro cell is configured and/or otherwise provisioned to request additional blanking by the macro cell  10 , and the macro cell is configured and/or otherwise provisioned to respond to that request as well as inform other neighboring metro cells of the outcome if additional blanking is granted. Suitably, the process  330  may be executed when the metro cell is already subjected to CAB, and the macro cell may already be employing ABS with some number of blank subframes. 
     As shown, the process begins at step  302  with the metro cell or its BS determining that a high percentage (e.g., above some set threshold) of its load is coming from an outer edge of its coverage area, and that not all the corresponding UEs can be scheduled in whatever subframes are already blanked by the macro cell  10 . Accordingly, at step  304 , the metro cell sends a request to the macro cell, along with an indication of the number of blank subframes requested based on how many UEs are in the border condition. 
     At step  306 , the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  evaluates capacity tradeoff, considering also its other neighboring metro cells, and allocates additional ABS as appropriate, i.e., increase the number of subframes during which the macro cell  10  blanks. Accordingly, at step  308 , the macro cell  10  responds to the request, e.g., with a message indicating the request has been granted. Suitably, the message may also inform the requesting metro cell which subframes will be blanked by the macro cell. The metro cell may then at step  308  schedule UEs at its border or in high interference conditions during those subframes when the macro cell  10  is blanking. Moreover, at step  310 , the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  will also inform all of its other neighboring metro cells of the ABS grant, so that they may utilize the additional subframes during which the macro cell is blanking to schedule their own UEs in high interference conditions. 
     The foregoing descriptions and/or processes generally deal with situations where there is a desire offload UEs from the macro to the metro cells and hence implement and/or increase CAB and/or ABS accordingly. Additionally, there may be similar processes and/or the macro and/or metro cells may likewise be configured and/or otherwise provisioned to handle essentially the opposite conditions. 
     For example, the metro cells may be configured and/or otherwise provisioned to determine that they may not demand as much ABS and so inform the macro cell. In particular, a suitable process may be executed when the metro cell is already subjected to CAB, and the macro cell may already be employing ABS with some number of blank subframes. For example, the metro cell or it BS may determine that a relatively low percentage (e.g., below some set threshold) of its load is coming from an outer edge of its coverage area, and that all the corresponding UEs can be scheduled in fewer subframes than are presently being blanked by the macro cell  10 . Accordingly, the metro cell sends a request to the macro cell indicating that fewer subframes can accommodate its border UEs (or those UEs in high interference conditions), along with an indication of the number of blank subframes the metro cell will still want to utilize or how many blanked subframes can be now be unblanked from the perspective of the requesting metro cell. 
     The macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  in response evaluates capacity tradeoff, considering also its other neighboring metro cells, and adjusts the number of blanked subframes as appropriate, i.e., decreasing the number of subframes during which the macro cell  10  blanks. Accordingly, the macro cell  10  responds to the request, e.g., with a message indicating the request has been granted. Suitably, the message may also inform the requesting metro cell which subframes will continued to be blanked by the macro cell (if any). The metro cell may then schedule UEs at its border or in high interference conditions during those subframes when the macro cell  10  is blanking. Moreover, the macro cell  10  and/or its BS  12  will also inform all of its other neighboring metro cells of the new ABS configuration, so that they may utilize the information in connection with scheduling their own UEs in high interference conditions. 
     In alternate embodiments, there may be other automatic triggers for selectively implementing CAB and/or ABS. In one embodiment, time of day, day of the week and/or other like temporal measurements can be used as semi-static triggers which automatically turn on and/or off either or both CAB and ABS as appropriate. This can be particularly useful, e.g., when a metro cell is deployed in a location where traffic patterns follow predictable usage, e.g., at lunch hour, rush hour, etc. In addition, other embodiments may simply determine automatically when to trigger the use or cessation of CAB and/or ABS, without actually changing the configuration of network elements in accordance therewith. Rather, when a given trigger is activated or otherwise tripped, a report or notification may be sent or provided to the network operator, e.g., in the form of an alarm or the like. The network operator could then act accordingly on the provided information to either turn on or turn off either or both CAB and ABS. 
     In another example, the macro cell and/or metro cells may be configured and/or otherwise provisioned to carry out and/or otherwise execute processes to address conditions where the macro cell is uncongested and one or more of the metro cells is congested and has had CAB applied. In this case, the macro cell may first determine that there are UEs in the border area of a metro cell, e.g., in the artificially extend coverage area. Suitably, this determination can be made based on RSRP measurements of the neighboring cells reported by the UEs. Accordingly, the macro cell may respond by decreasing the amount of bias being applied in for such a metro cell. This will generally result in the handover of the border area UEs from the metro cell to the macro cell. Again, the macro cell will then inform the affected metro that it has changed the bias amount, e.g., so that the metro cell can adjust its mobility parameters accordingly. Now the macro cell will re-evaluate whether the amount of ABS currently being implemented is still appropriate, and may adjust that as well. Suitably, any changes to the ABS configuration will in turn be reported from the macro cell to all its neighboring metro cells so they can adjust their scheduling accordingly. 
     It is also to be appreciated that particular elements or components described herein may have their functionality suitably implemented via hardware, software, firmware or a combination thereof. Additionally, it is to be appreciated that certain elements described herein as incorporated together may under suitable circumstances be stand-alone elements or otherwise divided. Similarly, a plurality of particular functions described as being carried out by one particular element may be carried out by a plurality of distinct elements acting independently to carry out individual functions, or certain individual functions may be split-up and carried out by a plurality of distinct elements acting in concert. Alternately, some elements or components otherwise described and/or shown herein as distinct from one another may be physically or functionally combined where appropriate. 
     In short, the present specification has been set forth with reference to preferred embodiments. Obviously, modifications and alterations will occur to others upon reading and understanding the present specification. It is intended that the invention be construed as including all such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.