Patent Publication Number: US-9405296-B2

Title: Collision targeting for hazard handling

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     The present application is related to and/or claims the benefit of the earliest available effective filing date(s) from the following listed application(s) (the “Priority Applications”), if any, listed below (e.g., claims earliest available priority dates for other than provisional patent applications or claims benefits under 35 USC §119(e) for provisional patent applications, for any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, etc. applications of the Priority Application(s)). In addition, the present application is related to the “Related Applications,” if any, listed below. 
     PRIORITY APPLICATIONS 
     
         
         
           
             (1) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/720,694, entitled “Inter-Vehicle Communication for Hazard Handling for an Unoccupied Flying Vehicle (UFV)”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 19 Dec. 2012, which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date. 
             (2) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/722,874, entitled “Unoccupied Flying Vehicle (UFV) Inter-Vehicle Communication for Hazard Handling”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 20 Dec. 2012, which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date. 
             (3) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/728,642, entitled “Inter-Vehicle Flight Attribute Communication for an Unoccupied Flying Vehicle (UFV)”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 27 Dec. 2012, which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date. 
             (4) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/730,202, entitled “Base Station Control for an Unoccupied Flying Vehicle (UFV)”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 28 Dec. 2012, which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date. 
             (5) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/731,363, entitled “Automated Hazard Handling Routine Engagement”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 31 Dec. 2012 (on same date herewith), which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date. 
             (6) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/731,407, entitled “Automated Hazard Handling Routine Activation”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 31 Dec. 2012 (on same date herewith), which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date. 
             (7) For purposes of the USPTO extra-statutory requirements, the present application constitutes a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/731,450, entitled “Collision Targeting for an Unoccupied Flying Vehicle (UFV)”, naming Royce A. Levien, Richard T. Lord, Robert W. Lord, Mark A. Malamud, John D. Rinaldo, Jr., and Lowell L. Wood, Jr. as inventors, filed 31 Dec. 2012 (on same date herewith), which is currently co-pending or is an application of which a currently co-pending application is entitled to the benefit of the filing date. 
           
         
       
    
     If an Application Data Sheet (ADS) has been filed on the filing date of this application, it is incorporated by reference herein. Any applications claimed on the ADS for priority under 35 U.S.C. §§119, 120, 121, or 365(c), and any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, etc. applications of such applications, are also incorporated by reference, including any priority claims made in those applications and any material incorporated by reference, to the extent such subject matter is not inconsistent herewith. 
    
    
     RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     None 
     The United States Patent Office (USPTO) has published a notice to the effect that the USPTO&#39;s computer programs require that patent applicants reference both a serial number and indicate whether an application is a continuation, continuation-in-part, or divisional of a parent application. Stephen G. Kunin, Benefit of Prior-Filed Application, USPTO Official Gazette Mar. 18, 2003. The USPTO further has provided forms for the Application Data Sheet which allow automatic loading of bibliographic data but which require identification of each application as a continuation, continuation-in-part, or divisional of a parent application. The present Applicant Entity (hereinafter “Applicant”) has provided above a specific reference to the application(s) from which priority is being claimed as recited by statute. Applicant understands that the statute is unambiguous in its specific reference language and does not require either a serial number or any characterization, such as “continuation” or “continuation-in-part,”for claiming priority to U.S. patent applications. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Applicant understands that the USPTO&#39;s computer programs have certain data entry requirements, and hence Applicant has provided designation(s) of a relationship between the present application and its parent application(s) as set forth above and in any ADS filed in this application, but expressly points out that such designation(s) are not to be construed in any way as any type of commentary and/or admission as to whether or not the present application contains any new matter in addition to the matter of its parent application(s). If the listings of applications provided above are inconsistent with the listings provided via an ADS, it is the intent of the Applicant to claim priority to each application that appears in the Priority Applications section of the ADS and to each application that appears in the Priority Applications section of this application. 
     All subject matter of the Priority Applications and the Related Applications and of any and all parent, grandparent, great-grandparent, etc. applications of the Priority Applications and the Related Applications, including any priority claims, is incorporated herein by reference to the extent such subject matter is not inconsistent herewith. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES 
         FIG. 1  is a schematic diagram of at least one unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIG. 2  is a schematic diagram of example realizations for at least one UFV in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIGS. 3A-3C  are schematic diagrams of example UFV hazard handling scenarios or environments in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIG. 4  is a schematic diagram of an example unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) including one or more example components in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIG. 5  is a schematic diagram of an example base station, which may be in communication with at least one UFV, including one or more example components for a base station in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIG. 6A  is a schematic diagram of an example UFV that has one or more functional modules or one or more operational components in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIG. 6B  is a schematic diagram of an example base station that has one or more functional modules or one or more operational components in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIG. 7A  is a schematic diagram that includes at least one example machine, such as base station, that is capable of handling scenarios for collision targeting for hazard handling in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIGS. 7B-7E  are schematic diagrams that include at least one example machine and that depict example scenarios for implementing collision targeting for hazard handling in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIG. 8A  is a flow diagram illustrating an example method for at least one machine with regard to collision targeting for hazard handling in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIGS. 8B-8E  depict example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of  FIG. 8A  in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIG. 9A  depicts example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of  FIG. 8A  in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
         FIGS. 10A-10B  depict example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of  FIG. 8A  in accordance with certain example embodiments. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     In the following detailed description, reference is made to the accompanying drawings, which form a part hereof. In the drawings, similar symbols typically identify similar components, unless context dictates otherwise. The illustrative embodiments described in the detailed description, drawings, and claims are not meant to be limiting. Other embodiments may be utilized, and other changes may be made, without departing from the spirit or scope of the subject matter presented here. 
       FIG. 1  is a schematic diagram  100  of at least one unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIG. 1 , by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram  100  may include at least one unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV)  102  or at least one remote UFV  102 R. For certain example implementations, any particular UFV: may be, comprise, or include a UFV  102 , such as a local UFV, or may be, comprise, or include a remote UFV  102 R. A given UFV scenario may be considered, analyzed, operated, viewed, or a combination thereof, etc. from a perspective of at least one local UFV  102  with regard to one or more remote UFVs  102 R. Disclosure herein or in the accompany drawings, which form a part hereof, that is directed to a UFV  102  may additionally or alternatively be applicable to a remote UFV  102 R, unless context dictates otherwise. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, a UFV  102  may comprise or include a vehicle that is not capable of being occupied by a human pilot (e.g., due to size, shape, power, atmospheric pressure, or a combination thereof, etc. constraints), a vehicle that is not designed to seat or otherwise safely support a person, a vehicle that is not controllable by an onboard human pilot, a vehicle that is being autonomously controlled at least partially by at least one onboard module, a vehicle that is being autonomously controlled at least partially by at least one off-board module, a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a UFV  102  may be at least comparable to or may comprise or include at least a portion of any one or more of: an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), a remotely piloted vehicle (RPV), an unmanned combat air vehicle (UCAV), an unmanned aircraft (UA), a drone, an optionally-piloted vehicle (OPV) that is not currently being controlled by an on-board pilot, a remotely piloted aircraft (RPA), a remotely operated aircraft (ROA), a radio-controlled aircraft (R/C aircraft), an unmanned-aircraft vehicle system (UAVS), an unmanned aircraft system (UAS), a small unmanned air system (sUAS), a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a UFV  102  may fly through a fluid (e.g., the earth&#39;s atmosphere or the air), through at least a partial vacuum (e.g., space or near-earth orbit), a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 2  is a schematic diagram  200  of example realizations for at least one UFV in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIG. 2 , by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram  200  may include at least one unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV)  102 , at least one fixed wing UFV  102   a , at least one rotary wing UFV  102   b , at least one ornithopter UFV  102   c , at least one lighter-than-air (LTA) UFV  102   d , at least one tilt-wing UFV  102   e , at least one hybrid UFV  102   f , or at least one other type of UFV  102   g . However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, a UFV  102  may be realized as described by any one or more of the examples in this paragraph. First, a UFV  102  may be realized as a fixed wing UFV  102   a , such as a propeller-driven biplane or a jet plane. Second, a UFV  102  may be realized as a rotary wing UFV  102   b , such as a helicopter or a gyrodyne. Third, a UFV  102  may be realized as an ornithopter UFV  102   c , such as small craft that has flapping wings like an animal (e.g., like a dragonfly, bee, bird, or bat, etc.). Fourth, a UFV  102  may be realized as an LTA UFV  102   d , such as a blimp, a balloon, or a dirigible. Fifth, a UFV  102  may be realized as a tilt-wing UFV  102   e , such as a propeller-driven airplane with wings that rotate at least during vertical takeoff or landing. Sixth, a UFV  102  may be realized as a hybrid UFV  102   f  that combines one or more capabilities or structural characteristics of at least one fixed wing UFV  102   a , at least one rotary wing UFV  102   b , at least one ornithopter UFV  102   c , at least one LTA UFV  102   d , at least one tilt-wing UFV  102   e , or at least one other UFV  102   g . Seventh, a UFV  102  may be realized as an other type of UFV  102   g , such as a tilt-rotor craft, a submarine, a rocket, a spaceship, a satellite, a vertical take-off and landing (VTOL) craft, a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, a UFV  102  may additionally or alternatively be realized so as to have one or more features, capabilities, structural characteristics, or a combination thereof, etc. as described by any one or more of the examples in this paragraph. First, a UFV  102  may include one rotor, two rotors (e.g., in a tandem, transverse, coaxial, or intermeshing, etc. configuration), three rotors, four rotors (e.g., a quadcopter, or a quadrotor, etc.), a combination thereof, or so forth. Second, a UFV  102  may include a propeller engine, a jet engine, an electric engine, a rocket engine, a ramjet or scramjet engine, a combination thereof, or so forth. Third, a UFV  102  may have at least one wing (e.g., a monoplane, a biplane, or a triplane, etc. in a stacked or tandem wing configuration), which may include a straight wing, a swept wing, a delta wing, a variable sweep wing, a combination thereof, or so forth. Fourth, a UFV  102  may be realized as having a fuselage, as having a flying wing structure, as having a blended-wing body, a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIGS. 3A-3C  are schematic diagrams  300 A- 300 C, respectively, of example UFV hazard handling scenarios or environments in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIGS. 3A-3C , by way of example but not limitation, each of schematic diagrams  300 A- 300 C may include at least one unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV)  102 , at least one remote UFV  102 R, or ground  304 . In each scenario or environment of schematic diagrams  300 A- 300 C, at least one UFV  102  may be flying above ground  304  and endeavoring to detect, sense, avoid, manage, mitigate, communicate about, coordinate over, eliminate, predict, remove, account for, remedy aftermath caused by, cooperate to address, or a combination thereof, etc. at least one hazard. For certain example embodiments, hazards may include, but are not limited to, other unoccupied flying vehicles, occupied flying vehicles, ground  304 , buildings or other structures (not shown) on ground  304 , moving objects, weather conditions, stationary objects, some combination thereof, or so forth. A UFV  102  may be attempting to accomplish a mission, an objective, a task, a combination thereof, or so forth. In operation, a UFV may be in communication with at least one remote UFV, at least one pilot-occupied flying vehicle (POFV), at least one base station (not shown in  FIG. 3A ), at least one other entity, a combination thereof, or so forth. Although scenarios or environments of schematic diagrams  300 A- 300 C may be shown in the drawings or described herein individually or separately, at least portions or aspects of such scenarios or environments may be implemented or may otherwise occur at least partially jointly, simultaneously in time, overlapping in space, as part of a single or extended operational theater, a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 3A  is a schematic diagram  300 A of an example UFV hazard handling scenario or environment in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIG. 3A , by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram  300 A may include at least one UFV  102 , at least one remote UFV  102 R, at least one pilot-occupied flying vehicle (POFV)  302 , or ground  304 . More specifically, schematic diagram  300 A may include a POFV  302 , a first POFV  302 ( 1 ), or a second POFV  302 ( 2 ). For certain example embodiments, a POFV  302  may comprise or include a vehicle that is currently being controlled by an onboard human pilot. For certain example embodiments, ground  304  may include or comprise at least a portion of the earth, a landscape, a cityscape, a prairie, a hill, a mountain, a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 3B  is a schematic diagram  300 B of another example UFV hazard handling scenario or environment in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIG. 3B , by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram  300 B may include at least one UFV  102 , at least one remote UFV  102 R, ground  304 , or at least one base station  306 . More specifically, schematic diagram  300 B may include a remote UFV  102 R, a first remote UFV  102 R( 1 ), or a second remote UFV  102 R( 2 ). For certain example embodiments, a base station  306  may comprise or include a machine that is adapted to at least partially control or is capable of controlling a UFV  102  from a distance via at least one wireless communication (not explicitly shown in  FIG. 3B ). For certain example implementations, a base station  306  may be fixed within a building or on a mobile ground vehicle, may be capable of being hand-held, may be incorporated into or as part of another flying vehicle, a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example implementations, a base station  306  may include or comprise a handheld controller (e.g., as may be used with an R/C model plane) for actual or near line-of-sight control, a workstation-sized or brief-case-sized controller that is mobile for operation out in the field (e.g., for police or corporate purposes), a larger apparatus that is typically stationary or may be housed in a secret or private building miles from an operational theater (e.g., for military or governmental purposes), a server-sized or distributed apparatus that provides control for a swarm of UFVs (e.g., for careful monitoring of a construction, agricultural, or warehouse site), some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a base station  306  may be controlling at least one UFV, such as first remote UFV  102 R( 1 ) or second remote UFV  102 R( 2 ), while not controlling at least one other UFV, such as UFV  102  or remote UFV  102 R (although it may be monitoring a UFV without controlling it). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 3C  is a schematic diagram  300 C of another example UFV hazard handling scenario or environment in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIG. 3C , by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram  300 C may include at least one UFV  102 , at least one remote UFV  102 R, at least one POFV  302 , ground  304 , at least one base station  306 , at least one communication  308 , or at least one flight path  312 . More specifically, UFV  102  may include at least one UFV hazard handling module  310 , or communication  308  may include at least one transmission  308 T or at least one reception  308 R. For certain example embodiments, a UFV  102  may transmit at least one transmission  308 T to or receive at least one reception  308 R from at least one of a remote UFV  102 R, a POFV  302 , a base station  306 , a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a UFV hazard handling module  310  may affect or at least partially control a flight path of a UFV  102  at least partially based on at least one of a transmission  308 T or a reception  308 R. For certain example embodiments, a flight path  312  may comprise or include any one or more of: a flight trajectory, a heading, a speed, a direction, a velocity, an acceleration, a position, an altitude, a stability level, a destination, a two-dimensional course or a three-dimensional course through air or space, a course through a spherical geometrical space, a time or times at which a course is to be traversed, a time or times at which one or more positions or one or more altitudes are to be attained, a time or times at which other flight characteristic(s) are to be attained, extrapolated position-time stamp pairs based on current flight characteristic(s), extrapolated altitude-time stamp pairs based on current flight characteristic(s), a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, a remote UFV  102 R, a POFV  302 , or a base station  306  may participate in at least one communication  308 , such as a transmission  308 T or a reception  308 R, with at least one UFV  102 . Although not explicitly shown in schematic diagram  300 C, for certain example embodiments, each of remote UFV  102 R, POFV  302 , or base station  306  may additionally or alternatively exchange at least one communication  308  with at least one other of remote UFV  102 R, POFV  302 , or base station  306 . For certain example implementations, a remote UFV  102 R may transmit at least one transmission  308 T to or receive at least one reception  308 R from at least one of a UFV  102 , another remote UFV  102 R, a POFV  302 , a base station  306 , a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example implementations, a POFV  302  may transmit at least one transmission  308 T to or receive at least one reception  308 R from at least one of a UFV  102 , a remote UFV  102 R, another POFV  302 , a base station  306 , a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example implementations, a base station  306  may transmit at least one transmission  308 T to or receive at least one reception  308 R from at least one of a UFV  102 , a remote UFV  102 R, a POFV  302 , another base station  306 , a combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 4  is a schematic diagram  400  of an example unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) including one or more example components in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIG. 4 , a UFV  102  may include one or more components such as: at least one processor  402 , one or more media  404 , logic  406 , circuitry  408 , at least one communication interface  410 , at least one interconnect  412 , at least one power source  414 , at least one motility mechanism  416 , one or more sensors  418 , some combination thereof, or so forth. Furthermore, as shown in schematic diagram  400 , one or more media  404  may include one or more instructions  420 , at least one hazard handling  422  routine, one or more flight attributes  424 , some combination thereof, or so forth; a communication interface  410  may include at least one wireless communication interface  410   a , at least one wired communication interface  410   b , some combination thereof, or so forth; or a motility mechanism  416  may include at least one power train  416   a , at least one steering assembly  416   b , some combination thereof, or so forth. However, a UFV  102  may alternatively include more, fewer, or different component(s) from those that are illustrated without departing from claimed subject matter. 
     For certain example embodiments, a UFV  102  may include or comprise at least one machine that is capable of flight, flight control processing, (local) flight control, some combination thereof, or so forth. UFV  102  may include, for example, a computing platform or any electronic device having at least one processor or memory. Processor  402  may include, by way of example but not limitation, any one or more of a general-purpose processor, a specific-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), a processing unit, some combination thereof, or so forth. A processing unit may be implemented, for example, with one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), DSPs, digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors generally, processing cores, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, some combination thereof, or so forth. Media  404  may bear, store, contain, include, provide access to, or a combination thereof, etc. instructions  420 , which may be executable by a processor  402 ; at least one hazard handling  422  routine, which may at least partially form at least a portion of instructions  420 ; one or more flight attributes  424 ; some combination thereof; or so forth. Instructions  420  may include or comprise, by way of example but not limitation, a program, a module, an application or app (e.g., that is native, that runs in a browser, that runs within a virtual machine, or a combination thereof, etc.), an operating system, or a combination thereof, etc. or portion thereof; operational data structures; source code, object code, just-in-time (JIT) compiled code, or a combination thereof, etc.; processor-executable instructions; other code; some combination thereof; or so forth. Media  404  may include, by way of example but not limitation, processor-accessible or non-transitory media (e.g., memory, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), flash memory, hard drives, disk-based media, disc-based media, magnetic storage, optical storage, volatile memory, nonvolatile memory, or a combination thereof, etc.) that is capable of bearing instructions, one or more hazard handling routines, one or more flight attributes, some combination thereof, or so forth. 
     For certain example embodiments, execution of instructions  420  by one or more processors  402  may transform at least a portion of UFV  102  into a special-purpose computing device, apparatus, platform, some combination thereof, or so forth. Instructions  420  may include, for example, instructions that are capable of realizing at least a portion of one or more flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. A hazard handling  422  routine may include, for example, instructions that are capable of realizing at least a portion of one or more flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings or that are directed toward detecting, sensing, avoiding, managing, mitigating, communicating about, coordinating over, eliminating, predicting, removing, accounting for, remedying aftermath caused by, cooperating to address, or a combination thereof, etc. at least one hazard. A flight attribute  424  may include, for example, data describing or representing at least one flight attribute of a UFV, such as one or more flight characteristics, one or more flight capabilities, a combination thereof, or so forth. Additionally or alternatively, at least a portion of flight attributes  424  may be at least partially accessible to or integrated with hazard handling  422 . 
     For certain example embodiments, logic  406  may include hardware, software, firmware, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, or a combination thereof, etc. that is capable of performing or facilitating performance of flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Circuitry  408  may include hardware, software, firmware, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, or a combination thereof, etc. that is capable of performing or facilitating performance of flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein circuitry  408  includes at least one physical or hardware component or aspect. 
     For certain example embodiments, one or more communication interfaces  410  may provide one or more interfaces between UFV  102  and another machine or a person/operator. With respect to a person/operator, a communication interface  410  may include, by way of example but not limitation, a screen, a speaker, keys/buttons, a microphone, or other person-device input/output apparatuses. A wireless communication interface  410   a  or a wired communication interface  410   b  may also or alternatively include, by way of example but not limitation, a transceiver (e.g., a transmitter or a receiver), a radio, an antenna, a wired interface connector or other similar apparatus (e.g., a network connector, a universal serial bus (USB) connector, a proprietary connector, a Thunderbolt® or Light Peak® connector, or a combination thereof, etc.), a physical or logical network adapter or port, a frequency converter, a baseband processor, a photoreceptor, or a combination thereof, etc. to communicate wireless signals or wired signals via one or more wireless communication links or wired communication links, respectively. Communications with at least one communication interface  410  may enable transmitting, receiving, or initiating of transmissions, just to name a few examples. 
     For certain example embodiments, at least one interconnect  412  may enable signal communication between or among components of UFV  102 . Interconnect  412  may include, by way of example but not limitation, one or more buses, channels, switching fabrics, some combination thereof, or so forth. Although not explicitly illustrated in  FIG. 4 , one or more components of UFV  102  may be coupled to interconnect  412  via a discrete or integrated interface. By way of example only, one or more interfaces may couple a communication interface  410  or a processor  402  to at least one interconnect  412 . For certain example embodiments, at least one power source  414  may provide power to one or more components of UFV  102 . Power source  414  may include, by way of example but not limitation, a battery, a power connector, a solar power source or charger, a mechanical power source or charger, a fuel source, a generator, an engine, some combination thereof, or so forth. 
     For certain example embodiments, at least one sensor  418  may sense, produce, or otherwise provide at least one sensor value. Sensors  418  may include, by way of example only, a camera, a microphone, an accelerometer, a thermometer, a satellite positioning system (SPS) sensor, a barometer, a humidity sensor, a compass, an altimeter, an airspeed detector, a gyroscope, a magnetometer, a pressure sensor, an oscillation detector, a light sensor, an inertial measurement unit (IMU), a tactile sensor, a touch sensor, a flexibility sensor, a microelectromechanical system (MEMS), some combination thereof, or so forth. Values provided by at least one sensor  418  may include, by way of example but not limitation, an image/video, a sound recording, an acceleration value, a temperature, one or more SPS coordinates, a barometric pressure, a humidity level, a compass direction, an altitude, an airspeed, a gyroscopic value, a magnetic reading, a pressure value, an oscillation value, an ambient light reading, inertial readings, touch detections, proximate object location, flex detections, some combination thereof, or so forth. 
     For certain example embodiments, a motility mechanism  416  may enable UFV  102  to fly, overcome gravitational forces, overcome wind resistance or drag, accelerate, avoid a hazard, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a power train  416   a  of a motility mechanism  416  may include one or more components that work separately or at least partially together to transform or convert stored energy into kinetic energy in order to propel UFV  102 . For certain example implementations, a power train  416   a  may include at least one engine, at least one transmission, one or more blades or propellers, at least one motor, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, a steering assembly  416   b  of a motility mechanism  416  may include one or more components that work separately or at least partially together to transform propulsive kinetic energy into forward, backward, up, down, right, left, a combination thereof, etc. movement or some other directionality change for a UFV. For certain example implementations, a steering assembly  416   b  may include at least one aileron, at least one rudder, at least one elevator, one or more blades or propellers, at least one transmission that routes power to different motors or other propulsive components, at least one rotor disk tilter, at least one blade pitch angle changer, or a combination thereof, or so forth. Although illustrated separately in schematic diagram  400 , power train  416   a  and steering assembly  416   b  may be implemented at least partially jointly to realize motility mechanism  416 . 
     However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, or so forth. For instance, it should be understood that for certain example implementations components that are illustrated separately in  FIG. 4  may not necessarily be separate or mutually exclusive. For example, a given component may provide multiple functionalities. By way of example only, a single component such as a photodetector may function as a wireless communication interface  410   a  or a sensor  418 . Additionally or alternatively, one or more instructions  420  may function to realize or embody at least part of hazard handling  422  or flight attributes  424 . 
     It should also be understood that for certain example implementations components that are illustrated in schematic diagram  400  or described herein may or may not be integral with or integrated into or onto a UFV  102 . For example, a component may be removably connected to a UFV  102 , a component may be wirelessly coupled to a UFV  102 , some combination thereof, or so forth. By way of example only, instructions  420  may be stored on a removable card having at least one medium  404 . Additionally or alternatively, at least a portion of a motility mechanism  416 , such as an engine or a fuel source, may be detachable from or replaceable with a UFV  102 . However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 5  is a schematic diagram  500  of an example base station, which may be in communication with at least one UFV (not shown in  FIG. 5 ), including one or more example components for a base station in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIG. 5 , a base station  306  may include one or more components such as: at least one processor  502 , one or more media  504 , logic  506 , circuitry  508 , at least one communication interface  510 , at least one interconnect  512 , at least one power source  514 , at least one entity interface  516 , some combination thereof, or so forth. Furthermore, as shown in schematic diagram  500 , one or more media  504  may include one or more instructions  518 , at least one hazard handling  520  routine, at least one flight attribute  522 , some combination thereof, or so forth; or communication interface  510  may include at least one wireless communication interface  510   a , at least one wired communication interface  510   b , some combination thereof, or so forth. However, a base station  306  may alternatively include more, fewer, or different component(s) from those that are illustrated without departing from claimed subject matter. 
     For certain example embodiments, a base station  306  may include or comprise at least one machine that is capable of flight control processing, (distant) flight control, some combination thereof, or so forth. Base station  306  may include, for example, a computing platform or any electronic device or devices having at least one processor or memory. Processor  502  may include, by way of example but not limitation, any one or more of a general-purpose processor, a specific-purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), a processing unit, some combination thereof, or so forth. A processing unit may be implemented, for example, with one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), DSPs, digital signal processing devices (DSPDs), programmable logic devices (PLDs), field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), processors generally, processing cores, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, controllers, micro-controllers, microprocessors, some combination thereof, or so forth. Media  504  may bear, store, contain, include, provide access to, or a combination thereof, etc. instructions  518 , which may be executable by a processor  502 ; at least one hazard handling  520  routine, which may at least partially form at least a portion of instructions  518 ; one or more flight attributes  522 ; some combination thereof; or so forth. Instructions  518  may include or comprise, by way of example but not limitation, a program, a module, an application or app (e.g., that is native, that runs in a browser, that runs within a virtual machine or server, or a combination thereof, etc.), an operating system, or a combination thereof, etc. or portion thereof; operational data structures; source code, object code, just-in-time (JIT) compiled code, or a combination thereof, etc.; processor-executable instructions; other code; some combination thereof; or so forth. Media  504  may include, by way of example but not limitation, processor-accessible or non-transitory media (e.g., memory, random access memory (RAM), read only memory (ROM), flash memory, hard drives, disk-based media, disc-based media, magnetic storage, optical storage, volatile memory, nonvolatile memory, or a combination thereof, etc.) that is capable of bearing instructions, one or more hazard handling routines, one or more flight attributes, some combination thereof, or so forth. 
     For certain example embodiments, execution of instructions  518  by one or more processors  502  may transform at least a portion of base station  306  into a special-purpose computing device, apparatus, platform, some combination thereof, or so forth. Instructions  518  may include, for example, instructions that are capable of realizing at least a portion of one or more flow diagrams methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. A hazard handling  520  routine may include, for example, instructions that are capable of realizing at least a portion of one or more flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings and that are directed toward interacting with at least one UFV to facilitate detecting, seeing, avoiding, managing, mitigating, communicating about, coordinating over, eliminating, predicting, removing, accounting for, remedying aftermath caused by, cooperating to address, or a combination thereof, etc. at least one hazard. A flight attribute  522  may include, for example, data describing or representing at least one flight attribute, such as one or more flight characteristics, one or more flight capabilities, a combination thereof, etc. of at least one UFV that base station  306  is communicating with, is at least partially controlling, is monitoring, some combination thereof, or so forth. Additionally or alternatively, at least a portion of flight attributes  522  may be at least partially accessible to or integrated with hazard handling  520 . 
     For certain example embodiments, logic  506  may include hardware, software, firmware, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, or a combination thereof, etc. that is capable of performing or facilitating performance of flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings. Circuitry  508  may include hardware, software, firmware, discrete/fixed logic circuitry, or a combination thereof, etc. that is capable of performing or facilitating performance of flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein circuitry  508  includes at least one physical or hardware component or aspect. 
     For certain example embodiments, one or more communication interfaces  510  may provide one or more interfaces between base station  306  and another machine or a person/operator/entity directly or indirectly. A wireless communication interface  510   a  or a wired communication interface  510   b  may also or alternatively include, by way of example but not limitation, a transceiver (e.g., a transmitter or a receiver), a radio, an antenna, a wired interface connector or other similar apparatus (e.g., a network connector, a universal serial bus (USB) connector, a proprietary connector, a Thunderbolt® or Light Peak® connector, a gateway, or a combination thereof, etc.), a physical or logical network adapter or port, a frequency converter, a baseband processor, an internet or telecommunications backbone connector, a fiber optic connector, a storage area network (SAN) connector, or a combination thereof, etc. to communicate wireless signals or wired signals via one or more wireless communication links or wired communication links, respectively. Communications with at least one communication interface  510  may enable transmitting, receiving, or initiating of transmissions, just to name a few examples. 
     For certain example embodiments, at least one interconnect  512  may enable signal communication between or among components of base station  306 . Interconnect  512  may include, by way of example but not limitation, one or more buses, channels, switching fabrics, local area networks (LANs), storage area networks (SANs), some combination thereof, or so forth. Although not explicitly illustrated in  FIG. 5 , one or more components of base station  306  may be coupled to interconnect  512  via a discrete or integrated interface. By way of example only, one or more interfaces may couple a processor  502  or a medium  504  to at least one interconnect  512 . For certain example embodiments, at least one power source  514  may provide power to one or more components of base station  306 . Power source  514  may include, by way of example but not limitation, a power connector for accessing an electrical grid, a fuel cell, a solar power source, one or more batteries, some combination thereof, or so forth. 
     For certain example embodiments, an entity interface  516  may enable one or more entities (e.g., a person, a group, an electronic agent, a robotic entity, or a combination thereof, etc.) to provide input to or receive output from base station  306 . Interactions between an entity and a base station may relate, by way of example but not limitation, to inputting or outputting instructions, commands, settings, flight characteristics, flight capabilities, some combination thereof, or so forth. Certain entity interfaces  516  may enable both entity input and entity output at base station  306  or over at least one network link. 
     However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, or so forth. For instance, it should be understood that for certain example implementations components that are illustrated separately in  FIG. 5  need not necessarily be separate or mutually exclusive. For example, a given component may provide multiple functionalities. By way of example only, hard-wired logic  506  may form circuitry  508 . Additionally or alternatively, a single component such as a connector may function as a communication interface  510  or as an entity interface  516 . Additionally or alternatively, one or more instructions  518  may function to realize or embody at least part of hazard handling  520  or flight attributes  522 . 
     It should also be understood that for certain example implementations components that are illustrated in schematic diagram  500  or described herein may not be integral or integrated with a base station  306 . For example, a component may be removably connected to a base station  306 , a component may be wirelessly coupled to a base station  306 , one or more components of a base station  306  may be geographically distributed or separated from one another, some combination thereof, or so forth. By way of example only, instructions  518  may be stored on one medium  504 , and flight attributes  522  (or another portion of instructions  518 ) may be stored on a different medium  504 , which may be part or a same server or a part of a different server of, e.g., a server farm. Additionally or alternatively, respective processor-media pairs, if any, may be physically realized on different or respective server blades or server containers for a base station  306  that is implemented on server hardware. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 6A  is a schematic diagram  600 A of an example UFV that has one or more functional modules or one or more operational components in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIG. 6A , example UFV  102  of schematic diagram  600 A may include, by way of example but not limitation, at least one UFV hazard handling module  310 , at least one communication interface  410 , at least one interconnect  412 , at least one motility mechanism  416 , one or more sensors  418 , or at least one UFV flight control module  602 . More specifically, communication interface  410  may include at least one radio  604 , or so forth; or motility mechanism  416  may include at least one power train  416   a , at least one steering assembly  416   b , some combination thereof, or so forth. However, a UFV  102  may alternatively include more, fewer, or different module(s) or component(s) from those that are illustrated without departing from claimed subject matter. 
     For certain example embodiments, a UFV hazard handling module  310  or a UFV flight control module  602  may operate to implement, perform, facilitate performance of, or a combination thereof, etc. one or more flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, modules, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings or that relate to handling an actual or a potential hazard. Example aspects related to hazard handling in a UFV context are described further herein above and below. Although UFV hazard handling module  310  and UFV flight control module  602  are illustrated separately in schematic diagram  600 A, they may additionally or alternatively be implemented at least partially in combination, jointly, with an overlapping functionality, some combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, a module of a UFV  102  may include or be comprised of at least one processor (e.g., a processor  402  of  FIG. 4 , etc.), one or more media (e.g., a medium  404  of  FIG. 4 , etc.), executable instructions (e.g., processor-executable instructions, instructions  420  of  FIG. 4 , computer-implementable instructions, etc.) incorporated into one or more media, logic (e.g., logic  406  of  FIG. 4 , etc.), circuitry (e.g., circuitry  408  of  FIG. 4 , etc.), other described or illustrated component(s), may be comprised as otherwise described herein, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example implementations, one or more modules (e.g., a UFV hazard handling module  310 , a UFV flight control module  602 , or a combination thereof, etc.) of at least one UFV  102  may function or interoperate with one or more modules of at least one remote UFV  102 R, at least one POFV  302 , at least one base station  306  (e.g., each of  FIGS. 3A-3C  or  FIG. 6B ), or a combination thereof, etc. via at least one radio  604  of UFV  102 . However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, UFV  102  may be in constant, infrequent, regular, irregular, intermittent, occasional, scheduled, unscheduled, a combination thereof, etc. communication with at least one remote UFV  102 R, at least one POFV  302 , at least one base station  306 , or a combination thereof, etc. via at least one radio  604 . One or more sensors  418  or at least one radio  604  may feed sensor readings, telemetry, flight attributes, weather conditions, topographical maps, coordination parameters, one or more automated hazard handling routines, a combination thereof, etc. to UFV hazard handling module  310 , UFV flight control module  602 , a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example implementations, UFV hazard handling module  310  may at least make hazard-related flight control decisions or provide flight control input to UFV flight control module  602  with regard to handling actual or potential hazards. For certain example implementations, UFV flight control module  602  may at least partially make flight control decisions or provide flight control commands to motility mechanism  416  so as to implement flight control decisions, including, by way of example but not limitation, based at least partly on flight control input provided by UFV hazard handling module  310 . Additionally or alternatively, a UFV hazard handling module  310  may supply flight control input, including by way of example but not limitation with at least one flight control command, directly (e.g., without routing it first through UFV flight control module  602 ) to motility mechanism  416 . To implement flight control decisions, including flight control commands, motility mechanism  416  may employ power train  416   a  to provide at least one propulsive force or may employ steering assembly  416   b  to provide at least one directional change. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 6B  is a schematic diagram  600 B of an example base station that has one or more functional modules or one or more operational components in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIG. 6B , example base station  306  of schematic diagram  600 B may include, by way of example but not limitation, at least one communication interface  510 , at least one interconnect  512 , at least one UFV flight control module  652 , at least one sensor  656 , at least one UFV flight coordination module  658 , or at least one UFV hazard handling module  660 . More specifically, communication interface  510  may include at least one radio  654 , or so forth. However, a base station  306  may alternatively include more, fewer, or different module(s) or component(s) from those that are illustrated without departing from claimed subject matter. Moreover, module(s) or component(s) that are illustrated in schematic diagram  600 B may alternatively or additionally be separate from or non-integrated with a base station  306 , such as being external to a housing of or remotely-accessible to a base station  306 , for certain example implementations. 
     For certain example embodiments, a UFV hazard handling module  660 , a UFV flight coordination module  658 , or a UFV flight control module  652  may operate to implement, perform, facilitate performance of, or a combination thereof, etc. one or more flow diagrams, methods, processes, procedures, operations, functionality, technology, modules, mechanisms, or a combination thereof, etc. that are described herein or illustrated in the accompanying drawings or that relate to handling of an actual or a potential hazard. Example aspects related to hazard handling in a UFV context with at least one base station are described further herein above and below. Although UFV hazard handling module  660 , UFV flight control module  652 , and UFV flight coordination module  658  are illustrated separately in schematic diagram  600 B, they may additionally or alternatively be implemented at least partially in combination, jointly, with an overlapping functionality, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, and by way of example but not limitation, at least a portion of one or more modules (e.g., module  702 , module  704 , or a combination thereof, etc.) that are described herein below with particular reference to  FIG. 7A  may be implemented as at least part of UFV hazard handling module  660 , as at least part of UFV flight control module  652 , as at least part of UFV flight coordination module  658 , some combination thereof, or so forth. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, a module of a base station  306  may include or be comprised of at least one processor (e.g., a processor  502  of  FIG. 5 , etc.), one or more media (e.g., a medium  504  of  FIG. 5 , etc.), executable instructions (e.g., processor-executable instructions, instructions  518  of  FIG. 5 , computer-implementable instructions, etc.) incorporated into one or more media, logic (e.g., logic  506  of  FIG. 5 , etc.), circuitry (e.g., circuitry  508  of  FIG. 5 , etc.), other described or illustrated component(s), may be comprised as otherwise described herein, some combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, one or more modules (e.g., a UFV hazard handling module  660 , a UFV flight control module  652 , a UFV flight coordination module  658 , or a combination thereof, etc.) of at least one base station  306  may function or interoperate with one or more modules of at least one UFV  102 , at least one remote UFV  102 R, at least one POFV  302 , at least one other base station  306  (e.g., each of  FIG. 3A-3C or 6A ), or a combination thereof, etc. via at least one radio  654  (or via a wired connection (not explicitly shown in  FIG. 6B ) of a communication interface  510 ) of base station  306 , such as by sending one or more commands to a UFV  102 . However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, a base station  306  may be in constant, infrequent, regular, irregular, intermittent, occasional, scheduled, unscheduled, a combination thereof, etc. communication with at least one UFV  102 , at least one remote UFV  102 R, at least one POFV  302 , at least one first UFV, at least one second UFV, at least one other base station  306 , or a combination thereof, etc. via at least one radio  654 . For certain example implementations, one or more sensors  656  (e.g., such as one or more of example sensor types described herein above with particular reference to sensor  418  (e.g., for a UFV  102  of  FIG. 4 )) or at least one radio  654  may feed sensor readings, telemetry, flight attributes, weather conditions, topographical maps, coordination parameters, at least one automated hazard handling routine, a combination thereof, etc. to UFV hazard handling module  660 , UFV flight control module  652 , UFV flight coordination module  658 , a combination thereof, or so forth. For certain example embodiments, UFV hazard handling module  660  may at least make hazard-related flight control decisions or provide flight control input to UFV flight control module  652  or UFV flight coordination module  658  with regard to handling actual or potential hazards. For certain example embodiments, UFV flight coordination module  658  may at least make multi-UFV coordination flight control decisions or provide flight control input to UFV flight control module  652  or UFV hazard handling module  660  with regard to coordinating two or more UFVs, with or without involvement by another base station. For certain example embodiments, UFV flight control module  652  may at least partially make flight control decisions or formulate flight control commands (e.g., for transmission via radio  654  to a UFV  102  and possible application to a motility mechanism  416  (e.g., of  FIG. 6A ) thereof) so as to realize flight control decisions, including, by way of example but not limitation, based at least partly on flight control input provided by at least UFV hazard handling module  660  or UFV flight coordination module  658 . However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 7A  is a schematic diagram  700 A that includes at least one example machine, such as a base station, that is capable of handling scenarios for collision targeting for hazard handling in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIG. 7A , by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram  700 A includes at least one machine that may include a collision target ascertainment module  702  or a diversion maneuver execution command transmission module  704 . More specifically, schematic diagram  700 A may include a machine that includes or comprises at least one base station  306 . By way of example but not limitation, a collision target ascertainment module  702  or a diversion maneuver execution command transmission module  704  may include or comprise or be realized with at least one processor that executes instructions (e.g., sequentially, in parallel, at least partially overlapping in a time-multiplexed fashion, at least partially across multiple cores, or a combination thereof, etc.) as at least one special-purpose computing component, or otherwise as described herein. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, a collision target ascertainment module  702  or a diversion maneuver execution command transmission module  704  may be implemented separately or at least partially jointly or in combination. For certain example implementations, a collision target ascertainment module  702  may be configured to ascertain at least one target for at least one collision to include a UFV. For certain example implementations, a diversion maneuver execution command transmission module  704  may be configured to transmit at least one command to execute at least one maneuver to divert a UFV at least toward at least one target to induce at least one collision to include the UFV and the at least one target. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIGS. 7B-7E  are schematic diagrams  700 B- 700 E that include at least one example machine and that depict example scenarios for implementing collision targeting for hazard handling in accordance with certain example embodiments. As shown in  FIGS. 7B-7E , by way of example but not limitation, one or more of schematic diagrams  700 B- 700 E may include at least one UFV  102 , at least one base station  306 , at least one transmission  706 , at least one target  708 , at least one collision  710 , at least one ascertainment  712 , at least one execution  714 , at least one maneuver  716 , at least one diversion  718 , or at least one command  720 . Each of schematic diagrams  700 B- 700 E may include alternative or additional depictions, which may relate to collision targeting for hazard handling, as described herein. In addition to or in alternative to description herein below with specific reference to  FIGS. 7B-7E , illustrated aspects of schematic diagrams  700 B- 700 E may be relevant to example description with reference to  FIG. 8A-8E, 9A , or  10 A- 10 B. However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     As shown in  FIG. 7B , by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram  700 B may include at least one UFV  102 , at least one base station  306 , at least one transmission  706 , at least one target  708 , at least one collision  710 , at least one ascertainment  712 , at least one execution  714 , at least one maneuver  716 , at least one diversion  718 , or at least one command  720 . For certain example embodiments, at least one collision target ascertainment module  702  (e.g., of  FIG. 7A ) of a base station  306  may effectuate at least one ascertainment  712  of at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  to include a UFV  102 . For certain example embodiments, at least one diversion maneuver execution command transmission module  704  (e.g., of  FIG. 7A ) of a base station  306  may effectuate at least one transmission  706  of at least one command  720  to a UFV  102  to execute  714  at least one maneuver  716  to divert  718  UFV  102  at least toward at least one target  708  to induce at least one collision  710  to include UFV  102  and at least one target  708 . However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. Additional or alternative description that may be relevant to schematic diagram  700 B is provided herein below with particular reference to one or more of any of  FIGS. 8A-8E ,  FIGS. 9A-9B , or  FIG. 10A . 
     As shown in  FIG. 7C , by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram  700 C may include at least one UFV  102 , at least one other UFV  102 O, at least one base station  306 , at least one transmission  706 , at least one target  708 , at least one collision  710 , at least one ascertainment  712 , at least one execution  714 , at least one maneuver  716 , at least one diversion  718 , at least one command  720 , at least one selection  722 , at least one value  724 , recoverability likelihood  726 , at least one related ownership  728   a , at least one related operator  728   b , at least one pilot-occupied flying vehicle (POFV)  302 , at least one harm amount  730 , at least one monetary harm  732 , at least one humanity harm  734 , at least one school  736 , at least one danger risk  738 , at least one potential collision target  740 , at least one incendiary location  742 , at least one man-made object  744 , at least one substantially stationary object  746 , at least one indication  748 , at least one map  750 , at least one population level  752 , at least one designated crashing zone  754 , at least one danger level  756 , or at least one prioritization  758 . However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. Additional or alternative description that may be relevant to schematic diagram  700 C is provided herein below with particular reference to one or more of any of  FIGS. 8A-8E ,  FIG. 9A , or  FIGS. 10A-10B . 
     As shown in  FIG. 7D , by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram  700 D may include at least one UFV  102 , at least one base station  306 , at least one transmission  706 , at least one target  708 , at least one collision  710 , at least one ascertainment  712 , at least one execution  714 , at least one maneuver  716 , at least one diversion  718 , at least one command  720 , at least one flight path  762 , at least one object  764 , at least one adjusted flight path  766 , at least one broadcast  768 , or at least one message  770 . However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. Additional or alternative description that may be relevant to schematic diagram  700 D is provided herein below with particular reference to one or more of any of  FIGS. 8A-8E ,  FIG. 9A , or  FIGS. 10A-10B . 
     As shown in  FIG. 7E , by way of example but not limitation, schematic diagram  700 E may include at least one UFV  102 , at least one base station  306 , at least one transmission  706 , at least one target  708 , at least one collision  710 , at least one ascertainment  712 , at least one execution  714 , at least one maneuver  716 , at least one diversion  718 , at least one command  720 , at least one object  764 , at least one determination  774 , at least one potential collision  776 , at least one likelihood  778 , at least one threshold likelihood  780 , at least one reporting  782 , at least one collision report  784 , at least one identification  786 , at least one identifying characteristic  788   a , at least one identifying characteristic  788   b , at least one identifying characteristic  788   c , or at least one potential target  790 . However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. Additional or alternative description that may be relevant to schematic diagram  700 E is provided herein below with particular reference to one or more of any of  FIGS. 8A-8E ,  FIG. 9A , or  FIGS. 10A-10B . 
     Following are a series of flowcharts depicting implementations. For ease of understanding, the flowcharts are organized such that the initial flowcharts present implementations via an example implementation and thereafter the following flowcharts present alternate implementations and/or expansions of the initial flowchart(s) as either sub-component operations or additional component operations building on one or more earlier-presented flowcharts. Those having skill in the art will appreciate that the style of presentation utilized herein (e.g., beginning with a presentation of a flowchart(s) presenting an example implementation and thereafter providing additions to and/or further details in subsequent flowcharts) generally allows for a rapid and easy understanding of the various process implementations. In addition, those skilled in the art will further appreciate that the style of presentation used herein also lends itself well to modular and/or object-oriented program design paradigms. 
       FIG. 8A  is a flow diagram  800 A illustrating an example method for at least one machine with regard to collision targeting for hazard handling in accordance with certain example embodiments. As illustrated, flow diagram  800 A may include any of operations  802 - 804 . Although operations  802 - 804  are shown or described in a particular order, it should be understood that methods may be performed in alternative manners without departing from claimed subject matter, including, but not limited to, with a different order or number of operations or with a different relationship between or among operations. Also, at least some operation(s) of flow diagram  800 A may be performed so as to be fully or partially overlapping with other operation(s). For certain example embodiments, one or more operations of flow diagram  800 A may be performed by at least one machine (e.g., a base station  306  or at least a portion thereof). 
     For certain example embodiments, a method for hazard handling for an unoccupied flying vehicle (UFV) (e.g., that includes, involves, addresses, reacts to, or a combination thereof, etc. or other otherwise handles at least one remote UFV  102 R, at least one first remote UFV  102 R( 1 ), at least one second remote UFV  102 R( 2 ), at least one POFV  302 , at least one other object that may present a collision risk, at least one weather-related condition, at least one obstacle to a mission objective, at least one hindrance to accomplishing a task, at least one delay to achieving a goal, or a combination thereof, etc.), which method may be at least partially implemented using hardware (e.g., circuitry, at least one processor, processor-accessible memory, at least one module, or a combination thereof, etc.) of a machine such as a base station, may include an operation  802  or an operation  804 . An operation  802  may be directed at least partially to ascertaining at least one target for at least one collision to include a UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may ascertain (e.g., acquire, determine, select, receive, obtain, compute, identify, spot, or a combination thereof, etc., such as via at least one ascertainment  712 ) at least one target  708  (e.g., a vehicle, a building, an object, a location, a spatial position, a goal to be reached, a tower, a wall, a portion of any of the previous, any of the previous in conjunction with a time, or a combination thereof, etc.) for at least one collision  710  (e.g., an impact, a touching, a grazing, a crash, a physical contact, a bump, a graze, a hit, a sideswipe, a scrape, or a combination thereof, etc.) to include a UFV  102  (e.g., a UAV, an RPV, a UCAV, a UA, an RPA, an ROA, an R/C aircraft, a UAVS, a UAS, an sUAS, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may ascertain at least one target for at least one collision to include a UFV (e.g., a base station control unit may determine at least one object to which it intends to cause physical contact with a UFV under its control, such as to prevent the UFV from impacting some other object). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  804  may be directed at least partially to transmitting at least one command to execute at least one maneuver to divert the UFV at least toward the at least one target to induce the at least one collision to include the UFV and the at least one target. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may transmit (e.g., send, communicate by wire, communicate wirelessly, frequency up-convert, modulate, encode, propagate, emanate from an emitter or antenna, or a combination thereof, etc., such as via at least one transmission  706  to a UFV  102 ) at least one command  720  (e.g., an instruction, an order with authority, a signal indicating to take an action, a directive with specificity, or a combination thereof, etc.) to execute (e.g., perform, carry out, accomplish, achieve, or a combination thereof, etc., such as via at least one execution  714 ) at least one maneuver  716  (e.g., a movement, a directional change, a speed change, a manipulation, a tactic, a procedure, or a combination thereof, etc.) to divert (e.g., to turn aside, to deflect, to change course, to veer, to direct or redirect, to swerve, to bank, to pivot, to rotate, to turn a different direction, or a combination thereof, etc., such as via at least one diversion  718 ) a UFV  102  at least toward (e.g., in a general direction of, in a precise direction of, vectoring where an expected location is or will be, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one target  708  to induce (e.g., to bring about, to cause, to produce, to effort to make happen, to take action that results in, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one collision  710  to include UFV  102  and at least one target  708 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may transmit at least one command to execute at least one maneuver to divert the UFV at least toward the at least one target to induce the at least one collision to include the UFV and the at least one target (e.g., a base station control unit may send a message to a UAV that instructs the UAV to alter its flight trajectory using propulsion or steering to change course toward a determined object with an intention to cause or in an attempt to cause an impact with the determined object). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIGS. 8B-8E  depict example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of  FIG. 8A  in accordance with certain example embodiments. As illustrated, flow diagrams of  FIGS. 8B-8E  may include any of the illustrated or described operations. Although operations are shown or described in a particular order or with a particular relationship to one or more other operations, it should be understood that methods may be performed in alternative manners without departing from claimed subject matter, including, but not limited to, with a different order or number of operations or with a different relationship between or among operations (e.g., operations that are illustrated as nested blocks are not necessarily subsidiary operations and may instead be performed independently). Also, at least some operation(s) of flow diagrams of  FIGS. 8B-8E  may be performed so as to be fully or partially overlapping with other operation(s). For certain example embodiments, one or more operations of flow diagrams  800 B- 800 E (of  FIGS. 8B-8E ) may be performed by at least one machine (e.g., a base station  306  or at least a portion thereof). 
       FIG. 8B  illustrates a flow diagram  800 B having example operations  810 ,  812 ,  814 ,  816 , or  818 . For certain example embodiments, an operation  810  may be directed at least partially to wherein the ascertaining at least one target for at least one collision to include a UFV (of operation  802 ) includes selecting at least one other UFV as the at least one target for the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one other UFV  102 O as at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select at least one other UFV as the at least one target for the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may select a different UAV as a collision target). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  812  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting at least one other UFV as the at least one target for the at least one collision (of operation  810 ) includes selecting the at least one other UFV as the at least one target based at least partially on at least one value of the at least one other UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one other UFV  102 O as at least one target  708  based at least partially on at least one value  724  of at least one other UFV  102 O. By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one other UFV as the at least one target based at least partially on at least one value of the at least one other UFV (e.g., a base station control unit may select another UAV as a collision target based at least partly on a monetary value or a strategic value of the other UAV, such as by selecting a less expensive UAV from between two potential UAV collision targets). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  814  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting at least one other UFV as the at least one target for the at least one collision (of operation  810 ) includes selecting the at least one other UFV as the at least one target based at least partially on a likelihood of recoverability from the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one other UFV  102 O as at least one target  708  based at least partially on a likelihood of recoverability  726  from at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one other UFV as the at least one target based at least partially on a likelihood of recoverability from the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may select another UAV as a collision target based at least partly on a belief or an indication that the other UAV is capable of surviving a collision and being able to continue flying). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  816  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting at least one other UFV as the at least one target for the at least one collision (of operation  810 ) includes selecting the at least one other UFV as the at least one target based at least partially on the at least one other UFV having at least one of a related ownership or a related operator as that of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one other UFV  102 O as at least one target  708  based at least partially on at least one other UFV  102 O having at least one of a related ownership  728   a  or a related operator  728   b  as that of UFV  102 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one other UFV as the at least one target based at least partially on the at least one other UFV having at least one of a related ownership or a related operator as that of the UFV (e.g., a base station control unit may select another UAV as a collision target based at least partly on knowledge or belief that the UAV and the other UAV share a common ownership or operators that have an ongoing business relationship to avoid damaging another entity&#39;s UAV). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  818  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting at least one other UFV as the at least one target for the at least one collision (of operation  810 ) includes selecting the at least one other UFV as the at least one target in lieu of a pilot-occupied flying vehicle (POFV). For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one other UFV  102 O as at least one target  708  in lieu of a pilot-occupied flying vehicle (POFV)  302 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one other UFV as the at least one target in lieu of a pilot-occupied flying vehicle (POFV) (e.g., a base station control unit may select another UAV as a collision target based at least partly on an intention to collide with an “unmanned” craft instead of a craft having at least one human onboard). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 8C  illustrates a flow diagram  800 C having example operations  830 ,  832 ,  834 ,  836 ,  838 , or  840 . For certain example embodiments, an operation  830  may be directed at least partially to wherein the ascertaining at least one target for at least one collision to include a UFV (of operation  802 ) includes selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on an amount of harm likely to result from the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  based at least partially on an amount of harm  730  likely (e.g., probably, predicted, possibly, estimated, or a combination thereof, etc.) to result from (e.g., flow from, occur as a consequence of, happen but for, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on an amount of harm likely to result from the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may select an object from among multiple objects with the selected object the one that is likely to cause a least amount of direct harm to the selected object or a least amount of indirect harm via collateral damage to surroundings). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  832  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on an amount of harm likely to result from the at least one collision (of operation  830 ) includes selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on an amount of monetary harm likely to result from the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  based at least partially on an amount of monetary harm  732  likely to result from at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on an amount of monetary harm likely to result from the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may select an object from among multiple objects that is likely to cause a lowest amount of financial harm, such as selecting a moped over two cars). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  834  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on an amount of harm likely to result from the at least one collision (of operation  830 ) includes selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on an amount of harm to one or more humans likely to result from the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  based at least partially on an amount of harm to one or more humans  734  likely to result from at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on an amount of harm to one or more humans likely to result from the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may select an object from between two objects that is likely to cause a lesser amount of human casualties, such as selecting an automobile over a city bus). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  836  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on an amount of harm to one or more humans likely to result from the at least one collision (of operation  834 ) includes selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision so as to avoid crashing into a school. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  so as to avoid crashing into a school  736 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one target for the at least one collision so as to avoid crashing into a school (e.g., a base station control unit may select a warehouse building for a collision target in lieu of a school house building). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  838  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on an amount of harm likely to result from the at least one collision (of operation  830 ) includes selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on a risk of danger associated with one or more potential collision targets. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  based at least partially on a risk of danger  738  associated with one or more potential (e.g., possible, available, options for, or a combination thereof, etc.) collision targets  740 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on a risk of danger associated with one or more potential collision targets (e.g., a base station control unit may select to crash into a roof of a building where the craft portions may scatter around the roof instead of a side of another building where the craft portions may rain down on passersby below). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  840  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision based at least partially on a risk of danger associated with one or more potential collision targets (of operation  838 ) includes selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision so as to avoid an incendiary location. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  so as to avoid an incendiary location  742 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one target for the at least one collision so as to avoid an incendiary location (e.g., a base station control unit may select a target location for a crash site from among multiple potential target locations so as to avoid a chemical factory). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 8D  illustrates a flow diagram  800 D having example operations  850 ,  852 ,  854 ,  856 , or  858 . For certain example embodiments, an operation  850  may be directed at least partially to wherein the ascertaining at least one target for at least one collision to include a UFV (of operation  802 ) includes selecting at least one man-made object as the at least one target. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one man-made object  744  (e.g., a building, a house, a vehicle, a bicycle, a sculpture, or a combination thereof, etc.) as at least one target  708 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select at least one man-made object as the at least one target (e.g., a base station control unit may select a water tower as a collision target). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  852  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting at least one man-made object as the at least one target (of operation  850 ) includes selecting a man-made object that is unlikely to be materially damaged by the at least one collision to include the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) a man-made object  744  that is unlikely to be materially damaged (e.g., unlikely to be destroyed, likely to receive no damage or only cosmetic or surface damage, probably going to retain substantial level of value—such as greater than 90%, likely to continue to function for its intended purpose—such as still be able to fly in air or shelter people, or a combination thereof, etc.) by at least one collision  710  to include UFV  102 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select a man-made object that is unlikely to be materially damaged by the at least one collision to include the UFV (e.g., a base station control unit may decide to target a concrete wall of a side of a building, which may survive a collision with only scrapes and abrasive markings, instead of a glass window of the side of the building, which may be shattered). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  854  may be directed at least partially to wherein the ascertaining at least one target for at least one collision to include a UFV (of operation  802 ) includes selecting a substantially stationary object as the at least one target. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) a substantially stationary object  746  (e.g., a non-moving-vehicle, a parked vehicle, a building, a tower that sways slightly, a mailbox, or a combination thereof, etc.) as at least one target  708 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select a substantially stationary object as the at least one target (e.g., a base station control unit may select for an intended collision an object that is secured to the earth, such as a shed or a power pole, over an object that is self-motile such as a tractor or another UAV, so as to increase a level of control regarding achieving a collision or so as to increase a level of certainty regarding consequences of a collision). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  856  may be directed at least partially to wherein the ascertaining at least one target for at least one collision to include a UFV (of operation  802 ) includes receiving from the UFV at least one indication of the at least one target for the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may receive (e.g., accept, decode, demodulate, down-convert, detect, obtain from or via a communication, route from an antenna, or a combination thereof, etc.) from a UFV  102  at least one indication  748  of (e.g., a reference to, a name of, a description of, a location of, an identification of, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may receive from the UFV at least one indication of the at least one target for the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may receive from an associated UFV GPS coordinates for a location of an object that may be or is that is to be selected as a collision target). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  858  may be directed at least partially to wherein the ascertaining at least one target for at least one collision to include a UFV (of operation  802 ) includes receiving from another UFV at least one indication of the at least one target for the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may receive (e.g., accept, decode, demodulate, down-convert, detect, obtain from or via a communication, route from an antenna, or a combination thereof, etc.) from another UFV  102 O at least one indication  748  of (e.g., a reference to, a name of, a description of, a location of, an identification of, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may receive from another UFV at least one indication of the at least one target for the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may receive from another UFV that is flying in a same theater of operations a heading toward or a description of a particular UFV or of a physical item that is to be selected as a collision target). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 8E  illustrates a flow diagram  800 E having example operations  870 ,  872 ,  874 ,  876 , or  878 . For certain example embodiments, an operation  870  may be directed at least partially to wherein the ascertaining at least one target for at least one collision to include a UFV (of operation  802 ) includes selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision using at least one map. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  using at least one map  750  (e.g., terrain description, visual or symbolic representation of an area, a navigational aid depicting geography—such as natural attributes of land or man-made structures, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one target for the at least one collision using at least one map (e.g., a base station control unit may select an object to be targeted for impact, such as a building or an area of land, with reference to at least one electronically-organized two-dimensional or three-dimensional or spherical representation of at least a portion of the earth or man-made improvements established thereon). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  872  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision using at least one map (of operation  870 ) includes selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision using the at least one map that is indicative of at least relative population levels. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  using at least one map  750  that is indicative of at least relative population levels  752 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one target for the at least one collision using the at least one map that is indicative of at least relative population levels (e.g., a base station control unit may select a crash target based at least partly on at least one indication that potential crash target A has a relatively higher population density than potential crash target B). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  874  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision using at least one map (of operation  870 ) includes selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision using the at least one map that is indicative of one or more designated crashing zones. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  using at least one map  750  that is indicative of one or more designated crashing zones  754 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one target for the at least one collision using the at least one map that is indicative of one or more designated crashing zones (e.g., a base station control unit may select a crash target based at least partly on at least one indication that an area, which is proximate to a current position at least given a current altitude, has been demarcated as an official crash-acceptable area by a governmental entity). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  876  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision using at least one map (of operation  870 ) includes selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision using the at least one map that is indicative of at least relative danger levels. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may select (e.g., via at least one selection  722 ) at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  using at least one map  750  that is indicative of at least relative danger levels  756 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may select the at least one target for the at least one collision using the at least one map that is indicative of at least relative danger levels (e.g., a base station control unit may select a crash target based at least partly on data in a layer of an electronic map that marks different areas as: not dangerous—such as vacant land, slightly dangerous—such as a populated urban areas, or very dangerous—such as places with electrical transformer stations or volatile manufacturing facilities). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  878  may be directed at least partially to wherein the selecting the at least one target for the at least one collision using at least one map (of operation  870 ) includes prioritizing one or more indications related to target collision selection that are associated with the at least one map. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may prioritize  758  (e.g., rank, ascertain relative importance, select for consideration, or a combination thereof, etc.) one or more indications related to target collision selection (e.g., indicators of danger level, indicators of population density, indicators of sturdiness/ability to withstand contact, indications of ownership, or a combination thereof, etc.) that are associated with (e.g., included as part of, tagged in, incorporated as a layer of, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one map  750 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may prioritize one or more indications related to target collision selection that are associated with the at least one map (e.g., a base station control unit may rank indicated population levels, indicated danger levels, indicated designated crash zones, or a combination thereof, etc. in relative importance to select a crash target from among multiple potential crash targets that are associated with different levels of population or danger or with a crash zone designation—such as a high population density level may be prioritized more strongly or more highly than a mid-level danger level). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 9A  depicts example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of  FIG. 8A  in accordance with certain example embodiments. As illustrated, a flow diagram of  FIG. 9A  may include any of the illustrated or described operations. Although operations are shown or described in a particular order or with a particular relationship to one or more other operations, it should be understood that methods may be performed in alternative manners without departing from claimed subject matter, including, but not limited to, with a different order or number of operations or with a different relationship between or among operations (e.g., operations that are illustrated as nested blocks are not necessarily subsidiary operations and may instead be performed independently). Also, at least some operation(s) of a flow diagram of  FIG. 9A  may be performed so as to be fully or partially overlapping with other operation(s). For certain example embodiments, one or more operations of flow diagram  900 A (of  FIG. 9A ) may be performed by at least one machine (e.g., a base station  306  or at least a portion thereof). 
       FIG. 9A  illustrates a flow diagram  900 A having example operations  910 ,  912 ,  914 , or  916 . For certain example embodiments, an operation  910  may be directed at least partially to wherein the transmitting at least one command to execute at least one maneuver to divert the UFV at least toward the at least one target to induce the at least one collision to include the UFV and the at least one target (of operation  804 ) includes transmitting the at least one command to accelerate toward the at least one target. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may transmit (e.g., via at least one transmission  706 ) at least one command  720  to accelerate (e.g., change a velocity, change a speed, change a direction, or a combination thereof, etc.) toward at least one target  708 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may transmit the least one command to accelerate toward the at least one target (e.g., a base station control unit may send a signal to a UAV to change a speed or a direction to alter its course heading so as to accelerate toward or to veer toward a targeted object or so as to otherwise increase a probability that the UAV will impact a targeted object). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  912  may be directed at least partially to wherein the transmitting at least one command to execute at least one maneuver to divert the UFV at least toward the at least one target to induce the at least one collision to include the UFV and the at least one target (of operation  804 ) includes transmitting the at least one command to adjust a flight path of the UFV to reduce a probability that the UFV will collide with an object that is not the at least one target. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may transmit (e.g., via at least one transmission  706 ) at least one command  720  to adjust (e.g., change, decrease speed or altitude of, increase speed or altitude of, change direction for, replace, cause a deviation in, adapt, modify, alter, deviate from, add something to, take something away from, or a combination thereof, etc.) a flight path  762  (e.g., a heading, a flight trajectory, a position, an altitude, a speed, a direction a velocity, an acceleration, a stability level, a destination, a course through air or space or a time at which the course is to be traversed, or a combination thereof, etc.) of a UFV  102  to reduce a probability that UFV  102  will collide with an object  764  that is not at least one target  708 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may transmit the at least one command to adjust a flight path of the UFV to reduce a probability that the UFV will collide with an object that is not the at least one target (e.g., a base station control unit may order a UAV via a wireless transmission to change a direction of its flight trajectory to avoid impacting a cellular antenna tower that it appears/appeared to be heading towards absent a change to the flight trajectory of the UAV). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  914  may be directed at least partially to wherein the transmitting at least one command to execute at least one maneuver to divert the UFV at least toward the at least one target to induce the at least one collision to include the UFV and the at least one target (of operation  804 ) includes transmitting the at least one command to adjust a flight path of the UFV so that the at least one target is substantially along at least a spatial aspect of an adjusted flight path of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may transmit (e.g., via at least one transmission  706 ) at least one command  720  to adjust (e.g., change, decrease speed or altitude of, increase speed or altitude of, change direction for, replace, cause a deviation in, adapt, modify, alter, deviate from, add something to, take something away from, or a combination thereof, etc.) a flight path  762  (e.g., a heading, a flight trajectory, a position, an altitude, a speed, a direction a velocity, an acceleration, a stability level, a destination, a course through air or space or a time at which the course is to be traversed, or a combination thereof, etc.) of a UFV  102  so that at least one target  708  is substantially along at least a spatial aspect (e.g., physical course, geographical path, altitude, or a combination thereof, etc.) of an adjusted flight path  766  of UFV  102 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may transmit the at least one command to adjust a flight path of the UFV so that the at least one target is substantially along at least a spatial aspect of an adjusted flight path of the UFV (e.g., a base station control unit may send a coordination command to a first UAV via a second UAV with instructions for the first UAV to change a direction and decrease a speed to affect its flight path having a spatial component, such as a set of points in space over the earth, so that the spatial component is anticipated to cross a flight trajectory of a targeted object such that the first UAV and the targeted object will attempt to occupy a single position at a same time, which is intended to result in a collision between the first UAV and the targeted object). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  916  may be directed at least partially to wherein the transmitting at least one command to execute at least one maneuver to divert the UFV at least toward the at least one target to induce the at least one collision to include the UFV and the at least one target (of operation  804 ) includes broadcasting at least one message indicative of an identity of the at least one target of the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may broadcast  768  (e.g., transmit in the open, send without encryption, communicate to multiple recipients, transmit for possible unknown potential recipients, communicate without knowing if all relevant receivers are known a priori, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one message  770  indicative of (e.g., including, referencing, providing a link to, or a combination thereof, etc.) an identity (e.g., a name, a description, a location, a code representing, or a combination thereof, etc.) of at least one target  708  of at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may broadcast at least one message indicative of an identity of the at least one target of the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may transmit on a broadcast channel an unencrypted message that includes (i) a description of a location—such as a position or a name—or (ii) call letters of a UAV that is being targeted for a collision). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIGS. 10A-10B  depict example additions or alternatives for a flow diagram of  FIG. 8A  in accordance with certain example embodiments. As illustrated, flow diagrams of  FIGS. 10A-10B  may include any of the illustrated or described operations. Although operations are shown or described in a particular order or with a particular relationship to one or more other operations, it should be understood that methods may be performed in alternative manners without departing from claimed subject matter, including, but not limited to, with a different order or number of operations or with a different relationship between or among operations (e.g., operations that are illustrated as nested blocks are not necessarily subsidiary operations and may instead be performed independently). Also, at least some operation(s) of flow diagrams of  FIGS. 10A-10B  may be performed so as to be fully or partially overlapping with other operation(s). For certain example embodiments, one or more operations of flow diagrams  1000 A- 1000 B (of  FIGS. 10A-10B ) may be performed by at least one machine (e.g., a base station  306  or at least a portion thereof). 
       FIGS. 10A-10B  each illustrate a flow diagram  1000 A- 1000 B, respectively, having an example operation  806 . For certain example embodiments, an operation  806  may be directed at least partially to wherein a method further includes implementing one or more additional operations. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may implement one or more operations in addition to ascertaining (of operation  802 ) or executing (of operation  804 ). Example additional operations may include, by way of example but not limitation, any one or more of operations  1010 ,  1012 ,  1014 ,  1020 ,  1022 ,  1024 ,  1026 ,  1028 ,  1030 , or  1032  (of  FIGS. 10A-10B ). 
       FIG. 10A  illustrates a flow diagram  1000 A having example operations  1010 ,  1012 , or  1014 . For certain example embodiments, an operation  1010  may be directed at least partially to wherein a method of ascertaining (of operation  802 ) or executing (of operation  804 ) further includes (at additional operation  806 ) determining that a potential collision to include the UFV and at least one object is likely imminent. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may determine  774  (e.g., calculate, predict, estimate, ascertain, or a combination thereof, etc.) that a potential collision  776  to include a UFV  102  and at least one object  764  is likely imminent (e.g., going to happen if no course is adjusted, probably occurring sufficiently soon that it is capable of being predicted, more likely to transpire than a given threshold, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may determine that a potential collision to include the UFV and at least one object is likely imminent (e.g., a base station control unit may determine that a possible collision with a pilot-occupied flying vehicle or a particular patch of the earth is likely to occur unless a flight maneuver is undertaken to avoid the collision—which determination may prompt ascertainment of a more suitable target for collision). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  1012  may be directed at least partially to wherein the determining that a potential collision to include the UFV and at least one object is likely imminent (of operation  1010 ) includes determining that the potential collision is to occur absent action by the UFV to avoid the potential collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may determine  774  that a potential collision  776  is to occur absent action (e.g., a flight path adjustment, a change in course, a warning to another self-motile object, or a combination thereof, etc.) by a UFV  102  to avoid potential collision  776 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may determine that the potential collision is to occur absent action by the UFV to avoid the potential collision (e.g., a base station control unit may determine that unless a UAV deviates from a present course and speed, a collision will occur with a plate glass window of a 32 nd  floor of a skyscraper). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  1014  may be directed at least partially to wherein the determining that a potential collision to include the UFV and at least one object is likely imminent (of operation  1010 ) includes determining that a likelihood associated with the potential collision meets at least one threshold likelihood. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may determine  774  that a likelihood  778  (e.g., a probability, a possibility, a calculated value, an ascertained category or level, or a combination thereof, etc.) associated with a potential collision  776  meets (e.g., is equal to, is greater than, is less than, compares favorably with, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one threshold likelihood  780 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may determine that a likelihood associated with the potential collision meets at least one threshold likelihood (e.g., a base station control unit may determine that a calculated probability that a collision with a UAV and another UAV is to happen meets or exceeds a predetermined evasive maneuver or impact-selection probability threshold). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
       FIG. 10B  illustrates a flow diagram  1000 B having example operations  1020 ,  1022 ,  1024 ,  1026 ,  1028 ,  1030 , or  1032 . For certain example embodiments, an operation  1020  may be directed at least partially to wherein a method of ascertaining (of operation  802 ) or executing (of operation  804 ) further includes (at additional operation  806 ) reporting the at least one collision automatically. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may report  782  (e.g., submit data or information pertaining to, make a transmission, provide a signal, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one collision  710  automatically (e.g., as a response to, without contemporaneous manual human direction, as part of predetermined coding or circuitry, or a combination thereof, etc.). By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may report the at least one collision automatically (e.g., a base station control unit may send to a collision reporting authority a description of a collision without contemporaneous human instruction and as a consequence of the collision&#39;s occurrence or impending occurrence). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  1022  may be directed at least partially to wherein the reporting the at least one collision automatically (of operation  1020 ) includes transmitting at least one collision report prior to occurrence of the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may transmit (e.g., send, communicate by wire, communicate wirelessly, frequency up-convert, modulate, encode, propagate, emanate from an emitter or antenna, or a combination thereof, etc.) at least one collision report  784  (e.g., message or communication that imparts one or more facts, characteristics, parameters, telemetry, or a combination thereof, etc. regarding an impact including a UFV and something else) prior to occurrence of at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may transmit at least one collision report prior to occurrence of the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may transmit to a base station a report indicative of an impending impact that includes an indication of a targeted object, a position, one or more flight characteristics, etc.). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  1024  may be directed at least partially to wherein the reporting the at least one collision automatically (of operation  1020 ) includes transmitting at least one collision report after occurrence of the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may transmit (e.g., send, communicate by wire, communicate wirelessly, frequency up-convert, modulate, encode, propagate, emanate from an emitter or antenna, or a combination thereof, etc. via) at least one collision report  784  (e.g., message or communication that imparts one or more facts, characteristics, parameters, telemetry, or a combination thereof, etc. regarding an impact including a UFV and something else) after occurrence of at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may transmit at least one collision report after occurrence of the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may repeatedly send a wireless signal out that indicates an existence of an impact and a best known location of record, such as from a most recent GPS fix). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  1026  may be directed at least partially to wherein the reporting the at least one collision automatically (of operation  1020 ) includes reporting an identification of the UFV. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may report  782  an identification  786  (e.g., a name, a serial number, FAA-issued alphanumeric designation, an owner or operator name, a make or model number, a description, a location, or a combination thereof, etc.) of a UFV  102 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may report an identification of the UFV (e.g., a base station control unit may report a serial number of a UAV, a make or model number of the UAV, an operator of the UAV, or an owner of the UAV, etc. before, during, or after a collision is experienced). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  1028  may be directed at least partially to wherein the reporting the at least one collision automatically (of operation  1020 ) includes reporting at least one identifying characteristic of the at least one target. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may report  782  at least one identifying characteristic  788   a  (e.g., a name, a serial number, FAA-issued alphanumeric designation, an owner or operator name, a make or model number, a description, a location—such as one or more coordinates, an address, a code representative, or a combination thereof, etc.) of at least one target  708 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may report at least one identifying characteristic of the at least one target (e.g., a base station control unit may report a description, a location, a name of, a code assigned to, call letters for, or a combination thereof, etc. for an object—such as a building or other UAV—that the UAV is intending to impact or for an object that the UAV has impacted). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  1030  may be directed at least partially to wherein the reporting the at least one collision automatically (of operation  1020 ) includes reporting at least one identifying characteristic of an object for which impact was avoided by execution of the at least one maneuver to induce the at least one collision. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may report  782  at least one identifying characteristic  788   b  (e.g., a name, a serial number, FAA-issued alphanumeric designation, an owner or operator name, a make or model number, a description, a location—such as one or more coordinates, an address, a code representative, a number of people affiliated with, or a combination thereof, etc.) of an object  764  for which impact was avoided by execution  714  of at least one maneuver  716  to induce at least one collision  710 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may report at least one identifying characteristic of an object for which impact was avoided by execution of the at least one maneuver to induce the at least one collision (e.g., a base station control unit may report a description, a location, a name of, a code assigned to, call letters for, or a combination thereof, etc. for an object—such as a school or a power line—that the UAV avoided impacting by virtue of colliding with a selected target—such as a parking lot or a tree). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     For certain example embodiments, an operation  1032  may be directed at least partially to wherein the reporting the at least one collision automatically (of operation  1020 ) includes reporting at least one identifying characteristic for one or more potential targets that are not selected as the at least one target for the at least one collision to include the UFV and the at least one target. For certain example implementations, at least one machine may report  782  at least one identifying characteristic  788   c  (e.g., a name, a serial number, FAA-issued alphanumeric designation, an owner or operator name, a make or model number, a description, a location—such as one or more coordinates, an address, a code representative of, a number of people affiliated with, or a combination thereof, etc.) for one or more potential targets  790  (e.g., that are considered, analyzed, inspected, or a combination thereof, etc. but) that are not selected as at least one target  708  for at least one collision  710  to include a UFV  102  and at least one target  708 . By way of example but not limitation, at least one base station may report at least one identifying characteristic for one or more potential targets that are not selected as the at least one target for the at least one collision to include the UFV and the at least one target (e.g., a base station control unit may report a description, a location, a name of, a code assigned to, call letters for, or a combination thereof, etc. for one or more potential impact targets—such as a school or a power line or a group of people—that were considered for, but were not selected as, a target for a collision—with such selection may ultimately instead be a parked car near a school). However, claimed subject matter is not limited to any particular described embodiments, implementations, examples, etc. 
     Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the foregoing specific exemplary processes and/or machines and/or technologies are representative of more general processes and/or machines and/or technologies taught elsewhere herein, such as in the claims filed herewith and/or elsewhere in the present application. 
     Those having skill in the art will recognize that the state of the art has progressed to the point where there is little distinction left between hardware, software, and/or firmware implementations of aspects of systems; the use of hardware, software, and/or firmware is generally (but not always, in that in certain contexts the choice between hardware and software can become significant) a design choice representing cost vs. efficiency tradeoffs. Those having skill in the art will appreciate that there are various vehicles by which processes and/or systems and/or other technologies described herein can be effected (e.g., hardware, software, and/or firmware), and that the preferred vehicle will vary with the context in which the processes and/or systems and/or other technologies are deployed. For example, if an implementer determines that speed and accuracy are paramount, the implementer may opt for a mainly hardware and/or firmware vehicle; alternatively, if flexibility is paramount, the implementer may opt for a mainly software implementation; or, yet again alternatively, the implementer may opt for some combination of hardware, software, and/or firmware. Hence, there are several possible vehicles by which the processes and/or devices and/or other technologies described herein may be effected, none of which is inherently superior to the other in that any vehicle to be utilized is a choice dependent upon the context in which the vehicle will be deployed and the specific concerns (e.g., speed, flexibility, or predictability) of the implementer, any of which may vary. Those skilled in the art will recognize that optical aspects of implementations will typically employ optically-oriented hardware, software, and or firmware. 
     In some implementations described herein, logic and similar implementations may include software or other control structures. Electronic circuitry, for example, may have one or more paths of electrical current constructed and arranged to implement various functions as described herein. In some implementations, one or more media may be configured to bear a device-detectable implementation when such media hold or transmit device detectable instructions operable to perform as described herein. In some variants, for example, implementations may include an update or modification of existing software or firmware, or of gate arrays or programmable hardware, such as by performing a reception of or a transmission of one or more instructions in relation to one or more operations described herein. Alternatively or additionally, in some variants, an implementation may include special-purpose hardware, software, firmware components, and/or general-purpose components executing or otherwise invoking special-purpose components. Specifications or other implementations may be transmitted by one or more instances of tangible transmission media as described herein, optionally by packet transmission or otherwise by passing through distributed media at various times. 
     Alternatively or additionally, implementations may include executing a special-purpose instruction sequence or invoking circuitry for enabling, triggering, coordinating, requesting, or otherwise causing one or more occurrences of virtually any functional operations described herein. In some variants, operational or other logical descriptions herein may be expressed as source code and compiled or otherwise invoked as an executable instruction sequence. In some contexts, for example, implementations may be provided, in whole or in part, by source code, such as C++, or other code sequences. In other implementations, source or other code implementation, using commercially available and/or techniques in the art, may be compiled//implemented/translated/converted into a high-level descriptor language (e.g., initially implementing described technologies in C or C++ programming language and thereafter converting the programming language implementation into a logic-synthesizable language implementation, a hardware description language implementation, a hardware design simulation implementation, and/or other such similar mode(s) of expression). For example, some or all of a logical expression (e.g., computer programming language implementation) may be manifested as a Verilog-type hardware description (e.g., via Hardware Description Language (HDL) and/or Very High Speed Integrated Circuit Hardware Descriptor Language (VHDL)) or other circuitry model which may then be used to create a physical implementation having hardware (e.g., an Application Specific Integrated Circuit). Those skilled in the art will recognize how to obtain, configure, and optimize suitable transmission or computational elements, material supplies, actuators, or other structures in light of these teachings. 
     The foregoing detailed description has set forth various embodiments of the devices and/or processes via the use of block diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples. Insofar as such block diagrams, flowcharts, and/or examples contain one or more functions and/or operations, it will be understood by those within the art that each function and/or operation within such block diagrams, flowcharts, or examples can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, or virtually any combination thereof. In one embodiment, several portions of the subject matter described herein may be implemented via Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), Field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs), digital signal processors (DSPs), or other integrated formats. However, those skilled in the art will recognize that some aspects of the embodiments disclosed herein, in whole or in part, can be equivalently implemented in integrated circuits, as one or more computer programs running on one or more computers (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more computer systems), as one or more programs running on one or more processors (e.g., as one or more programs running on one or more microprocessors), as firmware, or as virtually any combination thereof, and that designing the circuitry and/or writing the code for the software and or firmware would be well within the skill of one of skill in the art in light of this disclosure. In addition, those skilled in the art will appreciate that the mechanisms of the subject matter described herein are capable of being distributed as a program product in a variety of forms, and that an illustrative embodiment of the subject matter described herein applies regardless of the particular type of signal bearing medium used to actually carry out the distribution. Examples of a signal bearing medium include, but are not limited to, the following: a recordable type medium such as a floppy disk, a hard disk drive, a Compact Disc (CD), a Digital Video Disk (DVD), a digital tape, a computer memory, etc.; and a transmission type medium such as a digital and/or an analog communication medium (e.g., a fiber optic cable, a waveguide, a wired communications link, a wireless communication link (e.g., transmitter, receiver, transmission logic, reception logic, etc.), etc.). 
     In a general sense, those skilled in the art will recognize that the various aspects described herein which can be implemented, individually and/or collectively, by a wide range of hardware, software, firmware, and/or any combination thereof can be viewed as being composed of various types of “electrical circuitry.” Consequently, as used herein “electrical circuitry” includes, but is not limited to, electrical circuitry having at least one discrete electrical circuit, electrical circuitry having at least one integrated circuit, electrical circuitry having at least one application specific integrated circuit, electrical circuitry forming a general purpose computing device configured by a computer program (e.g., a general purpose computer configured by a computer program which at least partially carries out processes and/or devices described herein, or a microprocessor configured by a computer program which at least partially carries out processes and/or devices described herein), electrical circuitry forming a memory device (e.g., forms of memory (e.g., random access, flash, read only, etc.)), and/or electrical circuitry forming a communications device (e.g., a modem, communications switch, optical-electrical equipment, etc.). Those having skill in the art will recognize that the subject matter described herein may be implemented in an analog or digital fashion or some combination thereof. 
     Modules, logic, circuitry, hardware and software combinations, firmware, or so forth may be realized or implemented as one or more general-purpose processors, one or more processing cores, one or more special-purpose processors, one or more microprocessors, at least one Application-Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC), at least one Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA), at least one digital signal processor (DSP), some combination thereof, or so forth that is executing or is configured to execute instructions, a special-purpose program, an application, software, code, some combination thereof, or so forth as at least one special-purpose computing apparatus or specific computing component. One or more modules, logic, or circuitry, etc. may, by way of example but not limitation, be implemented using one processor or multiple processors that are configured to execute instructions (e.g., sequentially, in parallel, at least partially overlapping in a time-multiplexed fashion, at least partially overlapping across multiple cores, or a combination thereof, etc.) to perform a method or realize a particular computing machine. For example, a first module may be embodied by a given processor executing a first set of instructions at or during a first time, and a second module may be embodied by the same given processor executing a second set of instructions at or during a second time. Moreover, the first and second times may be at least partially interleaved or overlapping, such as in a multi-threading, pipelined, or predictive processing environment. As an alternative example, a first module may be embodied by a first processor executing a first set of instructions, and a second module may be embodied by a second processor executing a second set of instructions. As another alternative example, a particular module may be embodied partially by a first processor executing at least a portion of a particular set of instructions and embodied partially by a second processor executing at least a portion of the particular set of instructions. Other combinations of instructions, a program, an application, software, or code, etc. in conjunction with at least one processor or other execution machinery may be utilized to realize one or more modules, logic, or circuitry, etc. to implement any of the processing algorithms described herein. 
     Those skilled in the art will recognize that at least a portion of the devices and/or processes described herein can be integrated into a data processing system. Those having skill in the art will recognize that a data processing system generally includes one or more of a system unit housing, a video display device, memory such as volatile or non-volatile memory, processors such as microprocessors or digital signal processors, computational entities such as operating systems, drivers, graphical user interfaces, and applications programs, one or more interaction devices (e.g., a touch pad, a touch screen, an antenna, etc.), and/or control systems including feedback loops and control motors (e.g., feedback for sensing position and/or velocity; control motors for moving and/or adjusting components and/or quantities). A data processing system may be implemented utilizing suitable commercially available components, such as those typically found in data computing/communication and/or network computing/communication systems. 
     For the purposes of this application, “cloud” computing may be understood as described in the cloud computing literature. For example, cloud computing may be methods and/or systems for the delivery of computational capacity and/or storage capacity as a service. The “cloud” may refer to one or more hardware and/or software components that deliver or assist in the delivery of computational and/or storage capacity, including, but not limited to, one or more of a client, an application, a platform, an infrastructure, and/or a server The cloud may refer to any of the hardware and/or software associated with a client, an application, a platform, an infrastructure, and/or a server. For example, cloud and cloud computing may refer to one or more of a computer, a processor, a storage medium, a router, a switch, a modem, a virtual machine (e.g., a virtual server), a data center, an operating system, a middleware, a firmware, a hardware back-end, a software back-end, and/or a software application. A cloud may refer to a private cloud, a public cloud, a hybrid cloud, and/or a community cloud. A cloud may be a shared pool of configurable computing resources, which may be public, private, semi-private, distributable, scaleable, flexible, temporary, virtual, and/or physical. A cloud or cloud service may be delivered over one or more types of network, e.g., a mobile communication network, and the Internet. 
     As used in this application, a cloud or a cloud service may include one or more of infrastructure-as-a-service (“IaaS”), platform-as-a-service (“PaaS”), software-as-a-service (“SaaS”), and/or desktop-as-a-service (“DaaS”). As a non-exclusive example, IaaS may include, e.g., one or more virtual server instantiations that may start, stop, access, and/or configure virtual servers and/or storage centers (e.g., providing one or more processors, storage space, and/or network resources on-demand, e.g., EMC and Rackspace). PaaS may include, e.g., one or more software and/or development tools hosted on an infrastructure (e.g., a computing platform and/or a solution stack from which the client can create software interfaces and applications, e.g., Microsoft Azure). SaaS may include, e.g., software hosted by a service provider and accessible over a network (e.g., the software for the application and/or the data associated with that software application may be kept on the network, e.g., Google Apps, SalesForce). DaaS may include, e.g., providing desktop, applications, data, and/or services for the user over a network (e.g., providing a multi-application framework, the applications in the framework, the data associated with the applications, and/or services related to the applications and/or the data over the network, e.g., Citrix). The foregoing is intended to be exemplary of the types of systems and/or methods referred to in this application as “cloud” or “cloud computing” and should not be considered complete or exhaustive. 
     Those skilled in the art will recognize that it is common within the art to implement devices and/or processes and/or systems, and thereafter use engineering and/or other practices to integrate such implemented devices and/or processes and/or systems into more comprehensive devices and/or processes and/or systems. That is, at least a portion of the devices and/or processes and/or systems described herein can be integrated into other devices and/or processes and/or systems via a reasonable amount of experimentation. Those having skill in the art will recognize that examples of such other devices and/or processes and/or systems might include—as appropriate to context and application—all or part of devices and/or processes and/or systems of (a) an air conveyance (e.g., an airplane, rocket, helicopter, etc.), (b) a ground conveyance (e.g., a car, truck, locomotive, tank, armored personnel carrier, etc.), (c) a building (e.g., a home, warehouse, office, etc.), (d) an appliance (e.g., a refrigerator, a washing machine, a dryer, etc.), (e) a communications system (e.g., a networked system, a telephone system, a Voice over IP system, etc.), (f) a business entity (e.g., an Internet Service Provider (ISP) entity such as Comcast Cable, Qwest, Southwestern Bell, etc.), or (g) a wired/wireless services entity (e.g., Sprint, Cingular, Nextel, etc.), etc. 
     In certain cases, use of a system or method may occur in a territory even if components are located outside the territory. For example, in a distributed computing context, use of a distributed computing system may occur in a territory even though parts of the system may be located outside of the territory (e.g., relay, server, processor, signal-bearing medium, transmitting computer, receiving computer, etc. located outside the territory). A sale of a system or method may likewise occur in a territory even if components of the system or method are located and/or used outside the territory. Further, implementation of at least part of a system for performing a method in one territory does not preclude use of the system in another territory. 
     One skilled in the art will recognize that the herein described components (e.g., operations), devices, objects, and the discussion accompanying them are used as examples for the sake of conceptual clarity and that various configuration modifications are contemplated. Consequently, as used herein, the specific exemplars set forth and the accompanying discussion are intended to be representative of their more general classes. In general, use of any specific exemplar is intended to be representative of its class, and the non-inclusion of specific components (e.g., operations), devices, and objects should not be taken limiting. 
     With respect to the use of substantially any plural and/or singular terms herein, those having skill in the art can translate from the plural to the singular and/or from the singular to the plural as is appropriate to the context and/or application. The various singular/plural permutations are not expressly set forth herein for sake of clarity. 
     The herein described subject matter sometimes illustrates different components contained within, or connected with, different other components. It is to be understood that such depicted architectures are merely exemplary, and that in fact many other architectures may be implemented which achieve the same functionality. In a conceptual sense, any arrangement of components to achieve the same functionality is effectively “associated” such that the desired functionality is achieved. Hence, any two components herein combined to achieve a particular functionality can be seen as “associated with” each other such that the desired functionality is achieved, irrespective of architectures or intermedial components. Likewise, any two components so associated can also be viewed as being “operably connected”, or “operably coupled,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality, and any two components capable of being so associated can also be viewed as being “operably couplable,” to each other to achieve the desired functionality. Specific examples of operably couplable include but are not limited to physically mateable and/or physically interacting components, and/or wirelessly interactable, and/or wirelessly interacting components, and/or logically interacting, and/or logically interactable components. 
     In some instances, one or more components may be referred to herein as “configured to,” “configured by,” “configurable to,” “operable/operative to,” “adapted/adaptable,” “able to,” “conformable/conformed to,” etc. Those skilled in the art will recognize that such terms (e.g. “configured to”) can generally encompass active-state components and/or inactive-state components and/or standby-state components, unless context requires otherwise. 
     This application may make reference to one or more trademarks, e.g., a word, letter, symbol, or device adopted by one manufacturer or merchant and used to identify and distinguish his or her product from those of others. Trademark names used herein are set forth in such language that makes clear their identity, that distinguishes them from common descriptive nouns, that have fixed and definite meanings, and, in many if not all cases, are accompanied by other specific identification using terms not covered by trademark. In addition, trademark names used herein have meanings that are well-known and defined in the literature, and do not refer to products or compounds protected by trade secrets in order to divine their meaning. All trademarks referenced in this application are the property of their respective owners, and the appearance of one or more trademarks in this application does not diminish or otherwise adversely affect the validity of the one or more trademarks. All trademarks, registered or unregistered, that appear in this application are assumed to include a proper trademark symbol, e.g., the circle R or [trade], even when such trademark symbol does not explicitly appear next to the trademark. To the extent a trademark is used in a descriptive manner to refer to a product or process, that trademark should be interpreted to represent the corresponding product or process as of the date of the filing of this patent application. 
     While particular aspects of the present subject matter described herein have been shown and described, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that, based upon the teachings herein, changes and modifications may be made without departing from the subject matter described herein and its broader aspects and, therefore, the appended claims are to encompass within their scope all such changes and modifications as are within the true spirit and scope of the subject matter described herein. It will be understood by those within the art that, in general, terms used herein, and especially in the appended claims (e.g., bodies of the appended claims) are generally intended as “open” terms (e.g., the term “including” should be interpreted as “including but not limited to,” the term “having” should be interpreted as “having at least,” the term “includes” should be interpreted as “includes but is not limited to,” etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is intended, such an intent will be explicitly recited in the claim, and in the absence of such recitation no such intent is present. For example, as an aid to understanding, the following appended claims may contain usage of the introductory phrases “at least one” and “one or more” to introduce claim recitations. However, the use of such phrases should not be construed to imply that the introduction of a claim recitation by the indefinite articles “a” or “an” limits any particular claim containing such introduced claim recitation to claims containing only one such recitation, even when the same claim includes the introductory phrases “one or more” or “at least one” and indefinite articles such as “a” or “an” (e.g., “a” and/or “an” should typically be interpreted to mean “at least one” or “one or more”); the same holds true for the use of definite articles used to introduce claim recitations. In addition, even if a specific number of an introduced claim recitation is explicitly recited, those skilled in the art will recognize that such recitation should typically be interpreted to mean at least the recited number (e.g., the bare recitation of “two recitations,” without other modifiers, typically means at least two recitations, or two or more recitations). Furthermore, in those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, and C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, and C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). In those instances where a convention analogous to “at least one of A, B, or C, etc.” is used, in general such a construction is intended in the sense one having skill in the art would understand the convention (e.g., “a system having at least one of A, B, or C” would include but not be limited to systems that have A alone, B alone, C alone, A and B together, A and C together, B and C together, and/or A, B, and C together, etc.). It will be further understood by those within the art that typically a disjunctive word and/or phrase presenting two or more alternative terms, whether in the description, claims, or drawings, should be understood to contemplate the possibilities of including one of the terms, either of the terms, or both terms unless context dictates otherwise. For example, the phrase “A or B” will be typically understood to include the possibilities of “A” or “B” or “A and B.” 
     With respect to the appended claims, those skilled in the art will appreciate that recited operations therein may generally be performed in any order. Also, although various operational flows are presented in a sequence(s), it should be understood that the various operations may be performed in other orders than those which are illustrated, or may be performed concurrently. Examples of such alternate orderings may include overlapping, interleaved, interrupted, reordered, incremental, preparatory, supplemental, simultaneous, reverse, or other variant orderings, unless context dictates otherwise. Furthermore, terms like “responsive to,” “related to,” or other past-tense adjectives are generally not intended to exclude such variants, unless context dictates otherwise. 
     While various aspects and embodiments have been disclosed herein, other aspects and embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art. The various aspects and embodiments disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and are not intended to be limiting, the true scope and spirit being indicated by the following claims.