Patent Publication Number: US-2021186948-A1

Title: Methods for the administration of iloperidone

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a continuation of co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/818,113 filed Mar. 13, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/286,878 filed Feb. 27, 2019, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/835,872 filed Dec. 8, 2017, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/710,817, filed May 13, 2015, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/150,575, filed Jan. 8, 2014 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,138,432, issued Sep. 22, 2015), which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/060,978, filed Oct. 23, 2013, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/576,178, filed Mar. 28, 2007 (now U.S. Pat. No. 8,586,610, issued Nov. 19, 2013), which is a 35 U.S.C. § 371 national stage entry of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2005/035526, filed Sep. 30, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/614,798, filed Sep. 30, 2004. Each of the foregoing patent applications is incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth. 
    
    
     SEQUENCE LISTING 
     The sequence listing contained in the electronic file titled “VAND-0002-US-CON7_SequenceListing_ST25_2021-03-02.txt,” created Mar. 2, 2021, comprising 2 KB, is hereby incorporated herein by reference. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Several genes associated with drug metabolism have been found to be polymorphic. As a result, the abilities of individual patients to metabolize a particular drug may vary greatly. This can prove problematic or dangerous where an increased concentration of a non-metabolized drug or its metabolites is capable of producing unwanted physiological effects. 
     The cytochrome P450 2D6 gene (CYP2D6), located on chromosome 22, encodes the Phase I drug metabolizing enzyme debrisoquine hydroxylase. A large number of drugs are known to be metabolized by debrisoquine hydroxylase, including many common central nervous system and cardiovascular drugs. One such drug is iloperidone (1-[4-[3-[4-(6-fluoro-1,2-benzisoxazol-3-yl)-1-piperidinyl]propoxy]-3-methoxyphenyl]ethanone). Iloperidone and methods for its production and use as an antipsychotic and analgesic are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,866 to Strupczewski et al. The diseases and disorders that can be treated by administration of iloperidone include all forms of schizophrenia (i.e., paranoid, catatonic, disorganized, undifferentiated, and residual), schizoaffective disorders, bipolar mania/depression, cardiac arrhythmias, Tourette&#39;s Syndrome, brief psychotic disorder, delusional disorder, psychotic disorder NOS (not otherwise specified), psychotic disorder due to a general medical condition, schizophreniform disorder, and substance-induced psychotic disorder. P88 is an active metabolite of iloperidone. See, e.g., PCT WO2003020707, which is incorporated herein by reference. 
     Among the unwanted physiological effects associated with an increased concentration of iloperidone or its metabolites is prolongation of the electrocardiographic QT interval. Mutations in the CYP2D6 gene have been associated with a number of drug metabolism-related phenotypes. These include the ultra rapid metabolizer (UM), extensive metabolizer (EM), intermediate metabolizer (IM), and poor metabolizer (PM) phenotypes. Where a particular drug is capable of producing unwanted physiological effects in its metabolized or non-metabolized forms, it is desirable to determine whether a patient is a poor metabolizer of the drug prior to its administration. 
     A number of references are directed toward the identification of CYP2D6 mutations and their corresponding phenotypes. For example, United States Patent Application Publication No. 2003/0083485 to Milos et al. describes a novel CYP2D6 variant associated with the PM phenotype and methods for assessing whether an individual possesses the variant prior to the administration of a drug. United States Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0072235 to Dawson describes a primer set useful in identifying variants of the CYP2D6 gene. Similarly, United States Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0091909 to Huang describes methods for screening an individual for variants in the CYP2D6 gene and other cytochrome P450 genes and tailoring the individual&#39;s drug therapy according to his or her phenotypic profile. Finally, United States Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0096874 to Neville et al. describes methods for identifying cytochrome P450 variants. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention comprises the discovery that treatment of a patient, who has lower CYP2D6 activity than a normal person, with a drug that is pre-disposed to cause QT prolongation and is metabolized by the CYP2D6 enzyme, can be accomplishing more safely by administering a lower dose of the drug than would be administered to a person who has normal CYP2D6 enzyme activity. Such drugs include, for example, dolasetron, paroxetine, venlafaxin, and iloperidone. Patients who have lower than normal CYP2D6 activity are herein referred to as CYP2D6 Poor Metabolizers. 
     This invention also relates to methods for the identification of genetic polymorphisms that may be associated with a risk for QT prolongation after treatment with compounds metabolized by the CYP2D6 enzyme, particularly iloperidone or an active metabolite thereof or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of either (including, e.g., solvates, polymorphs, hydrates, and stereoisomers thereof), and related methods of administering these compounds to individuals with such polymorphisms. 
     The present invention describes an association between genetic polymorphisms in the CYP2D6 locus, corresponding increases in the concentrations of iloperidone or its metabolites, and the effect of such increases in concentrations on corrected QT (QTc) duration relative to baseline. Any number of formulas may be employed to calculate the QTc, including, for example, the Fridericia formula (QTcF) and the Bazett formula (QTcB), among others. The present invention includes any such formula or method for calculating a QTc. 
     A first aspect of the invention provides a method for treating a patient with iloperidone or an active metabolite thereof or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of either, comprising the steps of determining the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 genotype and administering to the patient an effective amount of iloperidone or an active metabolite thereof or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of either based on the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 genotype, such that patients who are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers receive a lower dose than patients who are CYP2D6 normal metabolizers. 
     Another aspect of the invention provides a method for treating a patient who is a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer with iloperidone or an active metabolite thereof or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of either, wherein the patient is administered a lower dosage than would be given to an individual who is not a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer. 
     Another aspect of the invention provides a method of treating a patient with iloperidone or an active metabolite thereof or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of either comprising the steps of determining whether the patient is being administered a CYP2D6 inhibitor and reducing the dosage of drug if the patient is being administered a CYP2D6 inhibitor. 
     Another aspect of the invention provides a method for determining a patient&#39;s CYP2D6 phenotype comprising the steps of administering to the patient a quantity of iloperidone or an active metabolite thereof or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of either, determining a first concentration of at least one of iloperidone and an iloperidone metabolite in the patient&#39;s blood, administering to the patient at least one CYP2D6 inhibitor, determining a second concentration of at least one of iloperidone and an iloperidone metabolite in the patient&#39;s blood, and comparing the first and second concentrations. 
     Another aspect of the invention provides a method for determining whether a patient is at risk for prolongation of his or her QTc interval due to iloperidone administration comprising the step of: determining a patient&#39;s CYP2D6 metabolizer status by either determining the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 genotype or CYP2D6 phenotype. In the case that a patient is determined to be at risk for prolongation of his or her QTc interval, the dose of iloperidone administered to the patient may be reduced. 
     Another aspect of the invention provides a method of administering iloperidone or an active metabolite thereof, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of either, for the treatment of a disease or disorder in a human patient comprising the steps of determining the activity of the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 enzyme on at least one of iloperidone and its metabolites relative to the activity of a wild type CYP2D6 enzyme and reducing the dose of at least one of iloperidone and its pharmaceutically acceptable salts if the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 enzyme activity is less than that of the wild type CYP2D6. 
     Another aspect of the invention relates to modifying the dose and/or frequency of dosing with iloperidone or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof based on the P88:P95 ratio and/or the (P88+iloperidone):P95 ratio in a blood sample of a patient being treated with iloperidone or P88, especially patients susceptible to QT prolongation or to harmful effects associated with QT prolongation. 
     Another aspect of the invention provides a kit for use in determining a CYP2D6 genotype of an individual, comprising a detection device, a sampling device, and instructions for use of the kit. 
     Another aspect of the invention provides a kit for use in determining a CYP2D6 phenotype of an individual, comprising a detection device, a collection device, and instructions for use of the kit. 
     Another aspect of the invention provides a kit for use in determining at least one of a P88 to P95 ratio and a P88 and iloperidone to P95 ratio in an individual, comprising a detection device, a collection device, and instructions for use of the kit. 
     Yet another aspect of the invention provides a method for commercializing a pharmaceutical composition comprising at least one of iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone, said method comprising: obtaining regulatory approval of the composition by providing data to a regulatory agency demonstrating that the composition is effective in treating humans when administered in accordance with instructions to determine whether or not a patient is a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer prior to determining what dose to administer to the patient; and disseminating information concerning the use of such composition in such manner to prescribers or patients or both. 
     The foregoing and other features of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of embodiments of the invention. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     Iloperidone is a benzisoxazole-piperidinyl derivative, currently in development for the treatment of CNS disorders. Data from placebo-controlled Phase III studies of iloperidone showed a Fridericia correction of QT duration (QTcF) increase of 0.1 to 8.5 msec at doses of 4-24 mg, when comparing a single ECG at baseline to a single ECG at endpoint. At lower doses of iloperidone (4 mg-16 mg) QTcF prolongation was minimal (0.1-5 msec). In the most recent study, a greater prolongation was observed when higher doses of iloperidone (20-24 mg/day) were studied. The mean change in the QTcF at doses 20-24 mg/day was 8.5 msec, and 4.6 msec in the 12-16 mg/day dose range in this study. These data suggest that treatment with iloperidone can be associated with prolongation of the QT interval similar to other drugs in this class, and that the effect may be dose sensitive in the clinical dose range. 
     The research leading to the present invention was designed to examine the effect of different doses of iloperidone relative to the effect of ziprasidone and quetiapine on QTc duration under carefully controlled conditions. To further evaluate the possible relationship between exposure to iloperidone and the comparators to QTc duration, reassessment after pharmacological inhibition of the principle metabolic pathways for each drug, under steady-state conditions, was also planned. 
     Blood samples for pharmacogenetic analysis were collected at screening. Two polymorphisms previously associated with poor metabolizing status were genotyped in the CYP2D6 locus and 251 genotypes were collected. The individual genotypes were studied for detection of association between genotype class and concentrations of iloperidone and its metabolites P88 and P95. The functional effect of the polymorphisms was also evaluated by analyzing the effect of the addition of the CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine on the concentrations of the parent drug and its metabolites. 
     The research leading to the present invention identified a significant association between CYP2D6 genotype and concentrations of P88 before the addition of inhibitors as well as the effect of this association on QTc prolongation. 
     Iloperidone is a substrate for two P450 enzymes; CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Most metabolic clearance of iloperidone depends on these two enzymes. CYP2D6 catalyzes hydroxylation of the pendant acetyl group to form metabolite P94, which is converted to P95 after some additional reactions. Addition of the CYP2D6 inhibitor fluoxetine, along with iloperidone resulted in increases of the area under the curve (AUC) for iloperidone and P88 of 131% and 119% respectively. Addition of the CYP3A4 inhibitor ketoconazole in interaction studies resulted in a 38-58% increase in the concentrations of iloperidone and its main metabolites P88 and P95. P88 has a pharmacological profile including affinity for the HERG channel similar to that of iloperidone. P95 is less lipophilic and is dissimilar in its binding profile compared to iloperidone, including having very low affinity for the HERG channel. For these reasons P95 is regarded as being pharmacologically inactive. 
     The addition of metabolic inhibitors in this study therefore allowed for an evaluation of the effect of increasing blood-concentration of iloperidone and/or its metabolites on QT duration. More specifically, this study allowed for an evaluation of the effect of iloperidone on QTc before and after the addition of the CYP2D6 inhibitor, paroxetine, as well as before and after the addition of the CYP3A4 inhibitor, ketoconazole. 
     The CYP2D6 gene is highly polymorphic, with more than 70 allelic variants described so far. See, e.g., www.imm.ki.se/CYPalleles/cyp2d6.htm. Most embodiments of the present invention concern the two most common polymorphisms within the CYP2D6 gene in Caucasian populations, CYP2D6G1846A and CYP2D6P34S (also referred to as CYP2D6C100T). These polymorphisms correspond to nucleotides 3465 and 1719, respectively, in GenBank sequence M33388.1 (GI:181303). The CYP2D6P34S/CYP2D6C100T polymorphism also corresponds to nucleotide 100 in GenBank mRNA sequence M20403.1 (GI:181349). 
     The CYP2D6G1846A polymorphism (known as the CYP2D6*4 alleles, encompassing *4A, *4B, *4C, *4D, *4E, *4F, *4G, *4H, *4J, *4K, and *4L) represents a G to A transition at the junction between intron 3 and exon 4, shifting the splice junction by one base pair, resulting in frameshift and premature termination of the protein (Kagimoto 1990, Gough 1990, Hanioka 1990). The CYP2D6P34S/CYP2D6C100T polymorphism (known as the CYP2D6*10 and CYP2D6*14 alleles) represents a C to T change that results in the substitution of a Proline at position 34 by Serine (Yokota 1993, Johansson 1994). Both of these polymorphisms have been associated with reduced enzymatic activity for different substrates (Johansson 1994, Dahl 1995, Jaanson 2002, see also review by Bertilsson 2002) 
     Methods 
     A. Samples 
     128 individuals consented to the pharmacogenetic study. Blood samples were collected according to the pharmacogenetics protocol and after the consent of patients. The DNA was extracted from whole blood by Covance using the PUREGENE DNA isolation kit (D-50K). 
     The 128 individuals that participated were a good representation of the total sample of 165 individuals that participated in the trial. 22 of 29 total were from the iloperidone 8 mg bid group, 30 of 34 were from the iloperidone 12 mg bid group, 22 of 31 from the 24 mg qd group, 3 of 5 of the risperidone group, 28 of 33 of the ziprazidone group, and 23 of 33 of the quetiapine group. 
     B. Genotyping 
     Genotypes for the CYP2D6G1846A polymorphism were ascertained for 123 of the 128 consenting individuals, while genotypes for the CYP2D6C100T polymorphism were identified for all 128 participants. Genotyping was performed on amplified DNA fragments. The CYP2D6 genomic region was amplified using a triplex PCR strategy (Neville 2002). In brief, primers used were: 
     Exons 1, 2 
       
     
       
         
           
               
               
            
               
                   
                 SEQ. ID NO. 1, 2D6L1F1: 
               
               
                   
                 CTGGGCTGGGAGCAGCCTC 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 SEQ. ID NO. 2, 2D6L1R1: 
               
               
                   
                 CACTCGCTGGCCTGTTTCATGTC 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Exons 3, 4, 5, 6 
       
     
       
         
           
               
               
            
               
                   
                 SEQ. ID NO. 3, 2D6L2F: 
               
               
                   
                 CTGGAATCCGGTGTCGAAGTGG 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 SEQ. ID NO. 4, 2D6L2R2: 
               
               
                   
                 CTCGGCCCCTGCACTGTTTC 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Exons 7, 8, 9 
       
     
       
         
           
               
               
            
               
                   
                 SEQ. ID NO. 5, 2D6L3F: 
               
               
                   
                 GAGGCAAGAAGGAGTGTCAGGG 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 SEQ. ID NO. 6, 2D6L3R5B: 
               
               
                   
                 AGTCCTGTGGTGAGGTGACGAGG 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Amplification was performed on 40-100 ng of genomic DNA using a GC-rich PCR kit (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) according to the manufacturer&#39;s recommendations. Thermocycling conditions were as follows: initial denaturation (3 min 95° C.), 10 cycles of 30 s of denaturation (30 s at 95° C.), annealing (30 s at 66° C.), and extension, (60 s at 72° C.) followed by 22 cycles: 30 s at 95° C., 30 s at 66° C., 60 s+5 s/cycle at 72° C. A final extension followed (7 min at 72° C.). 
     Third Wave Technologies, Inc (Madison, Wis.) developed the probe sets for genotyping. Genotyping was performed on PCR products using the Invader® assay (Lyamichev 1999) (Third Wave Technologies, Inc) according to the manufacturer&#39;s recommendations. 
     The genotypes of individuals distributed among the three iloperidone groups were not significantly different (Table 1A and 1B). 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1A 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Genotype frequencies by iloperidone dose class for CYP2D6C100T 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Iloperidone 
                 Genotype 
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 dose group 
                 CC 
                 CT 
                 TT 
                 Total 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Ilo 8 mg bid 
                     19 a   
                 2 
                 1 
                 22 
               
               
                   
                 Ilo 12 mg bid 
                 23 
                 6 
                 1 
                 30 
               
               
                   
                 Ilo 24 mg qd 
                 15 
                 6 
                 1 
                 22 
               
               
                   
                 Total 
                 57 
                 14 
                 3 
                 74 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   a number of individuals 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1B 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Genotype frequencies by iloperidone 
               
               
                 dose class for CYP2D6G1846A 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Iloperidone 
                 Genotype 
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 dose group 
                 AA 
                 AG 
                 GG 
                 Total 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Ilo 8 mg bid 
                 0 
                 3 
                 17 
                 20 
               
               
                   
                 Ilo 12 mg bid 
                 1 
                 6 
                 23 
                 30 
               
               
                   
                 Ilo 24 mg qd 
                 1 
                 5 
                 15 
                 21 
               
               
                   
                 Total 
                 2 
                 14 
                 55 
                 71 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     C. Statistical Analysis 
     The genotype effect of the two CYP2D6 polymorphisms on period 1 concentrations was evaluated using the following ANOVA model. Concentrations of iloperidone, P88, and P95 at Period 1, without inhibitor, at the time at which maximum blood concentration of the parent compound or metabolite was reached (T max) were used as the dependent variable, the genotypes of each polymorphism as classes and the treatment as a covariate. In order to adjust for treatment effects after the single dose of iloperidone, the 8 mg bid was coded as 8, the 12 mg bid as 12 and the 24 mg qd as 24. 
     The function of these polymorphisms on the degree of inhibition of the CYP2D6 enzyme was calculated from the ratio of concentrations of P88 and P95 in period 2, after the addition of the inhibitor of CYP2D6. The concentrations of iloperidone and/or its metabolites (e.g., P88 and P95) may be determined in period 1 and/or period 2 by any known or later-developed method or device, including titration. 
     D. Results and Discussion 
     In order to understand the functional significance of the two CYP2D6 polymorphisms on the activity of the enzyme, we examined the association of the various genotypes with the relative concentrations of the metabolites P88 and P95. It is known that P88 is degraded by CYP2D6 and that CYP2D6 is involved in the synthesis of P95. The relative amounts of P88 and P95 would therefore be controlled by the activity of the CYP2D6 enzyme. We calculated the ratio of P88/P95 before inhibition in Period 1 and at the T max of the two metabolites, as well as the ratio of P88/P95 in Period 2 after the addition of the CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine. In individuals with the wild type enzyme the concentration of P88 is expected to increase in Period 2, while in the same period the concentration of P95 is expected to decline. 
     For Period 1 the mean P88/P95 ratio among the 91 iloperidone treated patients was equal to 1.0 with a range from 0.14 to 8.19. Among the same individuals for Period 2 the mean ratio was 2.4 with a range from 0.5 to 8.49. The mean ratio of the ratios Period 1/Period 2 was equal to 0.37 with a range from 0.11 to 2.75. 
     Among the genotyped individuals the values were similar with means of 1, 2.45 and 0.37 for Period 1, Period 2 and Period 1/Period 2 respectively, indicating no sample bias. For polymorphism CYP2D6G1846A the means were significantly different between the three-genotype classes AA, AG and GG. For AA the respective values were 6.1, 3.41, and 1.89, for AG they were 2.4, 4.2, and 0.52 and for GG 0.57, 1.94 and 0.28 (Table 2). 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Ratios of P88, P95 concentrations according to genotype 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                   
                 P88/P95 
               
               
                 Population 
                 P88/P95 Period1 
                 P88/P95 Period 2 
                 (Period1/Period2) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 All 
                 1.0 (0.14-8.19) 
                 2.45 (0.50-8.49) 
                 0.37 (0.11-2.75) 
               
            
           
           
               
            
               
                 CYP2D6G1846A 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 AA 
                 6.1 (3.96-8.19) 
                 3.41 (2.96-3.87) 
                 1.89 (1.0-2.75)  
               
               
                 AG 
                 2.4 (0.44-7.0)  
                 4.20 (2.2-7.57)  
                 0.52 (0.14-1.28) 
               
               
                 GG 
                 0.57 (0.14-2.2)  
                 1.94 (0.52-4.71) 
                 0.28 (0.11-0.61) 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The differences between genotype classes were significant at the p&lt;0.0001 level in ANOVA test. These data suggest that the AA class represent a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer as indicated by the high ratio of P88/P95 in period 1 and the relatively small effect of the addition of the inhibitor in Period 2. The AG class seems to exhibit an intermediate phenotype between the poor metabolizer and the wild type with an approximately 2-fold reduction of the CYP2D6 activity after the addition of the inhibitor, as indicated by the ratio of the ratios (Table 2). This analysis provides a phenotypic characterization of the CYP2D6G1846A polymorphism as it relates to the metabolism of iloperidone. 
     Having established a functional role of this polymorphism, we calculated the concentrations of P88 at Period 1 at the T max of P88 for each genotype class. P88 concentrations were significantly (p&lt;0.005) higher for the AA and AG classes as compared to the GG class for each of the three iloperidone dose groups (Table 3). 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 P88 concentrations in Period 1 according to CYP2D6 genotype 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Genotype 
                 N obs 
                 LSMeans 
                 P value 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 AA 
                 2 
                 62.70 
                 &lt;0.0001 
               
               
                   
                 AG 
                 14 
                 31.40 
               
               
                   
                 GG 
                 55 
                 21.03 
               
            
           
           
               
               
            
               
                 TRT dose 
                 0.0015 
               
               
                 CYP2D6G1846A *TRT dose 
                 0.0058 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Although the number of individuals carrying the A allele is limited, the results obtained in the study consistently suggest that individuals of the AA and AG class are expected to experience higher concentrations of P88 at T max as compared with GG individuals. Similar results were obtained with polymorphism CYP2D6C100T (Table 4 and 5). 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Ratios of P88, P95 concentrations according to genotype 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                   
                 P88/P95 
               
               
                 Population 
                 P88/P95 Period1 
                 P88/P95 Period 2 
                 (Period1/Period2) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 All 
                  1.0 (0.14-8.19) 
                 2.45 (0.50-8.49) 
                 0.37 (0.11-2.75) 
               
            
           
           
               
            
               
                 CYP2D6C100T 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 CC 
                  0.6 (0.14-2.28) 
                 1.93 (0.52-4.71) 
                 0.27 (0.11-0.61) 
               
               
                 CT 
                 2.2 (0.44-7.0) 
                 4.14 (2.2-7.57)  
                 0.49 (0.14-1.28) 
               
               
                 TT 
                 5.24 (3.56-8.19) 
                 4.19 (2.96-5.74) 
                 1.46 (0.62-2.75) 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 P88 concentrations in Period 1 according to CYP2D6 genotype 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Genotype 
                 N obs 
                 LSMeans 
                 P value 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 CC 
                 57 
                 21.03 
                   
               
               
                   
                 CT 
                 14 
                 33.16 
                 &lt;0.0001 
               
               
                   
                 TT 
                 3 
                 51.00 
               
            
           
           
               
               
            
               
                 TRT dose 
                 &lt;0.0001 
               
               
                 CYP2D6C100T *TRT dose 
                 0.0015 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     This result is expected given the fact that this polymorphism is in almost complete linkage disequilibrium with the CYP2D6G1846A polymorphism. 
     In order to understand whether the difference in concentration of P88 at Period 1 T max was relevant to the increases in QTc after the addition of the inhibitors, we used the observed mean of P88 for the CYP2D6G1846A AG group to divide all individuals into two classes. The first includes individuals with P88 concentrations at Period 3, after the addition of both inhibitors, of equal to or less than 34 ng/mL and the second class includes individuals with P88 concentration greater than 34 ng/mL. We then compared the two classes in regards to the QTc change from baseline at Period 3. Using an ANOVA statistic for the first class P88&gt;34 (n=55) the QTc mean change from baseline in Period 3 was 22.7 msec and that for P88&lt;34 (n=12) the mean QTc for the same period was 7.7 msec. The QTc changes from baseline for Period 1 and Period 2 according to genotype and iloperidone dose are given in Table 6 and 7. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 6 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 QTc change at Period 1 according to 
               
               
                 CYP2D6 genotype and iloperidone dose 
               
            
           
           
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Iloperidone Dose 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Genotype 
                 8 mg bid 
                 12 mg bid 
                 24 mg qd 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
            
               
                 CYP2D6G1846A 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 AA 
                   
                 17.7 (1) a    
                 38.4 (1) 
               
               
                   
                 AG 
                 −0.8 (3)  
                 5.8 (6) 
                 19.0 (5) 
               
               
                   
                 GG 
                 7.8 (17) 
                 11.8 (23) 
                  14.0 (14) 
               
            
           
           
               
            
               
                 CYP2D6C100T 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 TT 
                 −8.4 (1)  
                 17.7 (1)  
                 38.4 (1) 
               
               
                   
                 CT 
                 2.9 (2)  
                 5.8 (6) 
                 19.0 (5) 
               
               
                   
                 CC 
                 7.8 (17) 
                 11.8 (23) 
                  9.5 (14) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   a number of individuals 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 7 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 QTc change at Period 2 according to 
               
               
                 CYP2D6 genotype and iloperidone dose 
               
            
           
           
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Iloperidone dose 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Genotype 
                 8 mg bid 
                 12 mg bid 
                 24 mg qd 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
            
               
                 CYP2D6G1846A 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 AA 
                   
                 25.0 (1)  
                 28.4 (1) 
               
               
                   
                 AG 
                 8.1 (3) 
                 8.7 (6) 
                 20.6 (5) 
               
               
                   
                 GG 
                 11.7 (18) 
                 14.5 (21) 
                  16.4 (15) 
               
            
           
           
               
            
               
                 CYP2D6C100T 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 TT 
                 −0.7 (1)  
                 25.0 (1)  
                 28.4 (1) 
               
               
                   
                 CT 
                 12.5 (2)  
                 8.7 (6) 
                 20.6 (5) 
               
               
                   
                 CC 
                 11.7 (16) 
                 14.5 (21) 
                  16.4 (15) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     These results however should be viewed with caution since the number of observations is small. If one was, however, to focus on the iloperidone 24 mg qd, there is a trend for higher QTc among AA, and AG individuals for CYP2D6G1846A as compared to GG. This difference disappears after the addition of the CYP2D6 inhibitor in Period 2. 
     These observations suggest that the differences in P88 concentrations during Period 1 between the different classes of genotypes may be relevant to QTc changes from baseline. Given the small number of observations and the unbalanced in regards to genotype design of the study, a confirmatory prospectively designed study may be required before any further interpretation of this data is warranted. Notwithstanding these caveats, the results discussed above show that patients can be more safely treated with iloperidone if the dose of iloperidone is adjusted based on the CYP2D6 genotype of each patient. For example, if a patient has a genotype which results in decreased activity of the CYP2D6 protein relative to the wild type CYP2D6, then the dose of iloperidone administered to such patient would be reduced to, for example, 75% or less, 50% or less, or 25% or less of the dose typically administered to a patient having a CYP2D6 genotype that results in a CYP2D6 protein that has the same or substantially the same enzymatic activity on P88 as the wild type CYP2D6 genotype/protein. For example, where the normal dosage of iloperidone or other CYP2D6-metabolized compound administered to an individual is 24 mg per day, an individual with a genotype associated with decreased CYP2D6 activity may receive a reduced dosage of 18, 12, or 6 mg per day. 
     Decreased CYP2D6 activity may be the result of other mutations, including those described at www.imm.ki.se/CYPalleles/cyp2d6.htm, which is incorporated herein by reference. In particular, it is noted that the CYP2D6*2A mutation includes a CYP2D7 gene conversion in intron 1. In some cases, the lower CYP2D6 activity in a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer may be due to factors other than genotype. For example, a patient may be undergoing treatment with an agent, e.g., a drug that reduces CYP2D6 activity. 
     QTc prolongation is correlated to the ratios of P88/P95 and (iloperidone+P88)/P95. The mean ratios among CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers were 0.57 and 1.00, respectively. As shown above in Tables 3 and 5, CYP2D6 poor metabolizers have elevated P88 levels compared to CYP2D6 extensive metabolizers. 
     As CYP2D6 poor metabolizers comprise approximately 15% of the population, it was found that approximately 15% of those studied exhibited a P88/P95 ratio greater than 2.0 while the remaining 85% exhibited P88/P95 ratios less than 2.0. Table 8 below shows the least squares mean change in QTc for each dosage group. While the results for some groups are not statistically significant, they do indicate a trend supporting the hypothesis that QTc prolongation is correlated to P88/P95 ratio. Similar results were obtained when cutoff ratios of 3.0 and 4.0 were analyzed, providing further support to the hypothesis that the extent of QTc prolongation a patient may experience after treatment can be predicted by measuring P88 and P95 blood levels. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 8 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Mean QTc Prolongation According to P88/P95 Ratio 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 LSMean QTc change 
                 LSMean QTc change 
                 LSMean QTc change 
                 LSMean QTc change 
                 LSMean QTc change 
               
               
                 P88/P95 
                 from Baseline 
                 from Baseline 
                 from Baseline 
                 from Baseline 
                 from Baseline 
               
               
                 Ratio 
                 8 mg bid 
                 12 mg bid 
                 8 + 12 mg bid 
                 24 qd 
                 All Treatment Groups 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 &lt;2 
                 7.2 
                 8.7 
                 8.3 
                 13.9 
                 10.244 
               
               
                   
                 (n = 23) 
                 (n = 31) 
                 (n = 54) 
                 (n = 24) 
                 (n = 78) 
               
               
                 &gt;2 
                 21.3 
                 17.4 
                 18.3 
                 29.4 
                 21.111 
               
               
                   
                 (n = 5) 
                 (n = 3) 
                 (n = 8) 
                 (n = 5) 
                 (n = 13) 
               
               
                 P value 
                 0.0725 
                 0.392 
                 0.0815 
                 0.0329 
                 0.0131 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Similar results were observed when considering QTc correlation to the (iloperidone+P88)/P95 ratio. Again, as approximately 15% of the population are CYP2D6 poor metabolizers, it was found that approximately 15% of those studied exhibited (iloperidone+P88)/P95 ratios greater than 3.0 while the remaining 85% exhibited ratios less than 3.0. Table 9 below shows the least squares mean change in QTc for each dosage group. While the results for some groups are not statistically significant, they do indicate a trend supporting the hypothesis that QTc prolongation is correlated to (iloperidone+P88)/P95 ratio. Indeed, when cutoff ratios of 4 and higher were analyzed, similar results were obtained providing further support to the hypothesis that the extent of QTc prolongation a patient may experience after treatment can be predicted by measuring iloperidone, P88 and P95 blood levels. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 9 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Mean QTc Prolongation According to (iloperidone + P88)/P95 Ratio 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 LSMean QTc change 
                 LSMean QTc change 
                 LSMean QTc change 
                 LSMean QTc change 
                 LSMean QTc change 
               
               
                 (ILO + P88)/P95 
                 from Baseline 
                 from Baseline 
                 from Baseline 
                 from Baseline 
                 from Baseline 
               
               
                 Ratio 
                 8 mg bid 
                 12 mg bid 
                 8 + 12 mg bid 
                 24 qd 
                 All Treatment Groups 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 &lt;3 
                 7.2 
                 8.7 
                 8.3 
                 14.4 
                 10.424 
               
               
                   
                 (n = 23) 
                 (n = 31) 
                 (n = 54) 
                 (n = 24) 
                 (n = 78) 
               
               
                 &gt;3 
                 21.3 
                 15.2 
                 17.3 
                 30.5 
                 20.031 
               
               
                   
                 (n = 5) 
                 (n = 3) 
                 (n = 8) 
                 (n = 5) 
                 (n = 13) 
               
               
                 P value 
                 0.0725 
                 0.4223 
                 0.0857 
                 0.0522 
                 0.0278 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The starting point for determining the optimum dose of iloperidone is, as discussed above, a dose that has been shown to be acceptably safe and effective in patients having a CYP2D6 genotype that results in a protein having the same activity on iloperidone and P88 as the wild type CYP2D6 protein. Such doses are known in the art and are disclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,364,866 discussed above. 
     Generally, the dose of iloperidone administered to a patient will be decreased, as discussed above, if the enzymatic activity of the CYP2D6 enzyme on iloperidone and P88 is less than about 75% of that of the wild type CYP2D6. Enzymatic activity may be determined by any number of methods, including, for example, measuring the levels of iloperidone and/or P88 in an individual&#39;s blood. In such a case, the iloperidone dose can be lowered such that measured levels of iloperidone and/or P88 are substantially the same as levels measured in the blood of individuals having normal CYP2D6 enzymatic activity. For example, if the CYP2D6 enzymatic activity of a patient is estimated by one or more methods (e.g., genotyping, determination of dextromorphan blood levels) to be 50% of the enzymatic activity normally observed in an individual having normal CYP2D6 enzymatic activity, the dose for the patient may need to be adjusted to one-half of the dose given to an individual having normal CYP2D6 enzymatic activity. Similarly, for ultrarapid metabolizers, an analogous calculation will lead to the conclusion that a dose adjustment of twice that given an individual having normal CYP2D6 enzymatic activity may be needed in order to achieve similar blood levels for the parent compound and active metabolites. 
     Alternatively, the dose of iloperidone administered to a patient may be decreased based upon the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 genotype alone, or upon the patient&#39;s P88:P95 or (iloperidone+P88):P95 ratios. For example, if a patient has a “poor metabolizer” genotype, or has a high P88:P95 or (iloperidone+P88):P95 ratio, the patient&#39;s dose of iloperidone may be reduced by, for example, 25%, 50%, or 75%. A patient&#39;s genotype can be readily determined using standard techniques on samples of body fluids or tissue. Such techniques are disclosed, e.g., in PCT Application Publication Number WO03054226. 
     While the CYP2D6G1846A (AA or AG) genotype and the CYP2D6C100T (CT or TT) genotype are illustrated herein, the method of the invention can employ other genotypes that result in decreased activity of the CYP2D6 protein on iloperidone and P88. It is within the skill of the art, based on the disclosure herein, to identify additional CYP2D6 genotypes that result in decreased enzymatic activity on iloperidone and P88. 
     Furthermore, while the disclosure herein focuses on genotype, it is apparent to one of skill in the art that phenotype can also be used as an indicator of decreased activity of the CYP2D6 protein on iloperidone and P88. For example, McElroy et al. describe a correlation between CYP2D6 phenotype and genotyping as determined by dextromethorphan/dextrorphan ratios. Therefore, although it is more convenient given the state of the art to look at genotype, if one were to determine that a given patient expressed a mutant CYP2D6 with lower activity on iloperidone and P88 than the wild type, or expressed abnormally low amounts of CYP2D6, then that patient would be given a lower dose of iloperidone than a patient with wild type CYP2D6, as discussed above. Alternative methods for determining the relative activity of a patient&#39;s CYP2D6 gene include biochemical assays to directly measure enzymatic activity, protein sequencing to examine the amino acid sequence of a patient&#39;s CYP2D6, monitoring transcription and translation levels, and sequencing the CYP2D6 gene mRNA transcript. For example, Chainuvati et al. describe assessment of the CYP2D6 phenotype using a multi-drug phenotyping cocktail (the Cooperstown 5+1 cocktail). 
     Iloperidone can be formulated into dosage units and administered to patients using techniques known in the art. See, e.g., PCT Application Publication Number WO03054226, US Patent Application Publication Number 20030091645, PCT Application Serial Number PCT EP03/07619, and PCT Application Publication Number WO02064141, all of which are incorporated herein by reference as though fully set forth. 
     In addition, the present invention provides a kit for determining a patient&#39;s CYP2D6 genotype and/or phenotype. Such a kit may include, for example, a detection means, a collection device, containers, and instructions, and may be used in determining a treatment strategy for a patient having one or more diseases or disorders for which iloperidone treatment is indicated. 
     Detection means may detect a CYP2D6 polymorphism directly or may detect the characteristic mRNA of the polymorphic gene or its polypeptide expression product. In addition, as will be recognized by one of skill in the art, detection means may also detect polymorphisms in linkage disequilibrium with a CYP2D6 polymorphism. Accordingly, any polymorphism in linkage disequilibrium with the CYP2D6 polymorphisms disclosed in this application may be used to indirectly detect such a CYP2D6 polymorphism, and is within the scope of the present invention. 
     Detection means suitable for use in the methods and devices of the present invention include those known in the art, such as polynucleotides used in amplification, sequencing, and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) detection techniques, Invader® assays (Third Wave Technologies, Inc.), Taqman® assays (Applied Biosystems, Inc.), gene chip assays (such as those available from Affymetrix, Inc. and Roche Diagnostics), pyrosequencing, fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET)-based cleavage assays, fluorescent polarization, denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), mass spectrometry, and polynucleotides having fluorescent or radiological tags used in amplification and sequencing. 
     A preferred embodiment of a kit of the present invention includes an Invader® assay, wherein a specific upstream “invader” oligonucleotide and a partially overlapping downstream probe together form a specific structure when bound to a complementary DNA sequence. This structure is recognized and cut at a specific site by the Cleavase enzyme, releasing the 5′ flap of the probe oligonucleotide. This fragment then serves as the “invader” oligonucleotide with respect to synthetic secondary targets and secondary fluorescently-labeled signal probes contained in a reaction mixture. This results in the specific cleavage of the secondary signal probes by the Cleavase enzyme. Fluorescence signal is generated when this secondary probe, labeled with dye molecules capable of fluorescence resonance energy transfer, is cleaved. Cleavases have stringent requirements relative to the structure formed by the overlapping DNA sequences or flaps and can, therefore, be used to specifically detect single base pair mismatches immediately upstream of the cleavage site on the downstream DNA strand. See, e.g., Ryan et al., Molecular Diagnosis, 4; 2:135-144 (1999); Lyamichev et al., Nature Biotechnology, 17:292-296 (1999); and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,846,717 and 6,001,567, both to Brow et al., all of which are hereby incorporated herein by reference. 
     Another preferred embodiment of a kit of the present invention includes a detection means comprising at least one CYP2D6 genotyping oligonucleotide specific to alleles known to predict a patient&#39;s metabolizer phenotype. More particularly, the means comprises an oligonucleotide specific for the CYP2D6G1846A or CYP2D6C100T polymorphism. The means may similarly comprise oligonucleotides specific for each polymorphism as well as the wild type sequence. 
     Detection methods, means, and kits suitable for use in the present invention are described in International Publication Nos. WO 03/0544266 and WO 03/038123, each of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference. It should also be understood that the methods of the present invention described herein generally may further comprise the use of a kit according to the present invention. 
     Collection devices suitable for use in the present invention include devices known in the art for collecting and/or storing a biological sample of an individual from which nucleic acids and/or polypeptides can be isolated. Such biological samples include, for example, whole blood, semen, saliva, tears, urine, fecal material, sweat, buccal smears, skin, hair, and biopsy samples of organs and muscle. Accordingly, suitable collection devices include, for example, specimen cups, swabs, glass slides, test tubes, lancets, and Vacutainer® tubes and kits. 
     The present invention encompasses treatment of a patient for any disease or condition that is ameliorated by administration of iloperidone. As discussed above, such diseases or conditions include, for example, schizoaffective disorders including schizophrenia, depression including bipolar depression, as well as other conditions such as cardiac arrhythmias, Tourette&#39;s syndrome, psychotic disorders and delusional disorders. 
     A related aspect of the invention is a method for obtaining regulatory approval for a pharmaceutical composition comprising iloperidone or an active metabolite thereof, or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of either, which comprises including in proposed prescribing information instructions to determine whether or not a patient is a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer prior to determining what dose to administer to the patient. In another related aspect, the invention is a method for commercializing (i.e., selling and promoting) pharmaceutical compositions comprising such compounds said method comprising obtaining regulatory approval of the composition by providing data to a regulatory agency demonstrating that the composition is effective in treating humans when administered in accordance with instructions to determine whether or not a patient is a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer prior to determining what dose to administer to the patient and then disseminating information concerning the use of such composition in such manner to prescribers (e.g., physicians) or patients or both. 
     Another aspect of the invention is a method for obtaining regulatory approval for the administration of iloperidone based, in part, on labeling that instructs the administration of a lower dose if the patient is already being administered a CYP2D6 inhibitor, e.g., paroxetine, etc. 
     EMBODIMENTS 
     In addition to other illustrative embodiments, this invention can be seen to comprise one or more of the following illustrative embodiments: 
     1. A method for treating a patient with an active pharmaceutical ingredient including at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone, comprising the steps of: 
     determining the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 genotype; and 
     administering to the patient an effective amount of the active pharmaceutical ingredient, whereby the amount of the active pharmaceutical ingredient is determined based on the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 genotype. 
     2. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the amount of the active pharmaceutical ingredient is decreased if the genotype indicates decreased enzymatic activity of the CYP2D6 enzyme relative to the wild type. 
     3. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the amount of the active pharmaceutical ingredient is decreased if the patient&#39;s CYP2D6G1846A genotype is AA. 
     4. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the amount of the active pharmaceutical ingredient is decreased if the patient&#39;s CYP2D6G1846A genotype is GA. 
     5. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the amount of the active pharmaceutical ingredient is decreased if the patient&#39;s CYP2D6C100T genotype is TT. 
     6. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the amount of the active pharmaceutical ingredient is decreased if the patient&#39;s CYP2D6C100T genotype is CT. 
     7. The method of embodiment 1, wherein the patient is suffering from at least one of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, depression, bipolar mania/depression, cardiac arrhythmia, Tourette&#39;s Syndrome, a psychotic disorder, a delusional disorder, and schizophreniform disorder. 
     8. The method of embodiment 7, wherein the patient is at risk for a prolonged QT interval. 
     9. A method for treating a patient who is a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer with a pharmaceutically active ingredient including at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone, wherein the patient is administered a lower dosage than would be given to an individual who is not a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer. 
     10. The method of embodiment 9, wherein the patient is determined to be a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer based on at least one of the patient&#39;s genotype, the patient&#39;s phenotype, and the fact that the patient is being treated with an agent that reduces CYP2D6 activity. 
     11. The method of embodiment 9, wherein the patient&#39;s genotype includes at least one CYP2D6 allele selected from a group consisting of 2549 A deletion, 1846 G&gt;A, 1707 T deletion, 2935 A&gt;C, 1758 G&gt;T, 2613−2615 AGA deletion, 1023 C&gt;T, 2850 C&gt;T, 4180G&gt;C, 1659 G&gt;A, 1661 G&gt;C, 2850 C&gt;T, 3183 G&gt;A, −1584 C, −1235 A&gt;G, −740C&gt;T, and −678 G&gt;A. 
     12. The method of embodiment 10, wherein the patient&#39;s genotype includes at least one deletion of the CYP2D6 gene. 
     13. The method of embodiment 11, wherein the patient&#39;s genotype includes a CYP2D7 gene conversion in intron 1. 
     14. The method of embodiment 9, wherein the patient is suffering from at least one of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, depression, bipolar mania/depression, cardiac arrhythmia, Tourette&#39;s Syndrome, a psychotic disorder, a delusional disorder, and schizophreniform disorder. 
     15. A method of treating a patient with a pharmaceutically active ingredient including at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone comprising the steps of: determining whether the patient is being administered a CYP2D6 inhibitor; and reducing the dosage of drug if the patient is being administered a CYP2D6 inhibitor. 
     16. The method of embodiment 15, wherein the CYP2D6 inhibitor includes at least one of paroxetine, dolasetron, venlafaxin, and fluoxetine. 
     17. The method of embodiment 15, wherein the patient is suffering from at least one of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, depression, bipolar mania/depression, cardiac arrhythmia, Tourette&#39;s Syndrome, a psychotic disorder, a delusional disorder, and schizophreniform disorder. 
     18. A method for determining a patient&#39;s CYP2D6 phenotype comprising the steps of: administering to the patient a quantity of at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone; and determining a first concentration of at least one of iloperidone and an iloperidone metabolite in the patient&#39;s blood. 
     19. The method of embodiment 18, wherein the iloperidone metabolite is selected from a group consisting of P88 and P95. 
     20. The method of embodiment 19, wherein a first concentration is determined for each of P88 and P95. 
     21. The method of embodiment 20, wherein the patient is designated a poor metabolizer if the ratio of first concentrations of P88 to P95 is greater than or equal to about 2.0. 
     22. The method of embodiment 20, wherein the patient is designated a poor metabolizer if the ratio of first concentrations of iloperidone and P88 to P95 is greater than or equal to about 3.0. 
     23. The method of embodiment 18, further comprising the steps of: administering to the patient at least one CYP2D6 inhibitor; determining a second concentration of at least one of iloperidone and an iloperidone metabolite in the patient&#39;s blood; and comparing the first and second concentrations. 
     24. The method of embodiment 23, wherein the CYP2D6 inhibitor is selected from a group consisting of paroxetine, ketoconazole, and fluoxetine. 
     25. The method of embodiment 23, wherein a second concentration is determined for each of P88 and P95. 
     26. The method of embodiment 25, wherein the patient is designated a poor metabolizer if the ratio of second concentrations of P88 to P95 is greater than or equal to about 2.0. 
     27. The method of embodiment 23, wherein a first and second concentration is determined for each of iloperidone, P88, and P95. 
     28. The method of embodiment 27, wherein the patient is designated a poor metabolizer if the ratio of second concentrations of iloperidone and P88 to P95 is greater than or equal to about 3.0. 
     29. A method for determining whether a patient is at risk for prolongation of his or her QTc interval due to administration of at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone comprising the steps of: measuring a first QTc interval; administering to the patient a quantity of at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone; measuring a second QTc interval; and comparing the first and second QTc interval. 
     30. The method of embodiment 29, wherein the dose of iloperidone administered to the patient is about 24 milligrams per day. 
     31. The method of embodiment 29, further comprising the step of administering to the patient at least one CYP2D6 inhibitor after the administering step. 
     32. The method of embodiment 31, wherein the CYP2D6 inhibitor is selected from a group consisting of paroxetine, ketoconazole, and fluoxetine. 
     33. A method of administering a pharmaceutically active ingredient including at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone for the treatment of at least one of a disease and a disorder in a human patient comprising the steps of: determining at least one of the activity of the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 enzyme on the pharmaceutically active ingredient relative to the activity of a wild type CYP2D6 enzyme and the expression of the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 enzyme relative to expression in an individual having normal CYP2D6 enzyme expression; and reducing the dose of the pharmaceutically active ingredient where at least one of the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 enzyme activity is less than that of the wild type CYP2D6 and the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 enzyme expression is less than that of an individual having normal CYP2D6 enzyme expression. 
     34. The method of embodiment 33, wherein the patient is suffering from at least one of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, depression, bipolar mania/depression, cardiac arrhythmia, Tourette&#39;s Syndrome, a psychotic disorder, a delusional disorder, and schizophreniform disorder. 
     35. The method of embodiment 33, wherein the determining step comprises: administering to the patient a quantity of at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone; determining a first concentration of at least one of iloperidone and an iloperidone metabolite in the patient&#39;s blood; administering to the patient at least one CYP2D6 inhibitor; determining a second concentration of at least one of iloperidone and an iloperidone metabolite in the patient&#39;s blood; and comparing the first and second concentrations. 
     36. The method of embodiment 35, wherein the CYP2D6 inhibitor is selected from a group consisting of paroxetine, ketoconazole, and fluoxetine. 
     37. The method of embodiment 35, wherein the iloperidone metabolite is selected from a group consisting of P88 and P95. 
     38. The method of embodiment 37, wherein a first and second concentration is determined for each of P88 and P95. 
     39. The method of embodiment 35, wherein the patient is designated a poor metabolizer if the ratio of second concentrations of P88 to P95 is greater than or equal to about 2.0. 
     40. The method of embodiment 37, wherein a first and second concentration is determined for each of iloperidone, P88, and P95. 
     41. The method of embodiment 40, wherein the patient is designated a poor metabolizer if the ratio of second concentrations of iloperidone and P88 to P95 is greater than ore equal to about 3.0. 
     42. The method of embodiment 33, wherein the determining step is based on the individual&#39;s phenotype. 
     43. A kit for determining a CYP2D6 genotype of an individual, comprising: a detection device; a sampling device; and instructions for use of the kit. 
     44. The kit of embodiment 43, wherein the detection device includes a polynucleotide for binding to a portion of the CYP2D6 gene, the polynucleotide including at least one of a fluorescent tag and a radiological tag. 
     45. The kit of embodiment 44, wherein the polynucleotide will bind to only one of a CYP2D6 wild-type sequence and a polymorphic CYP2D6 sequence. 
     46. The kit of embodiment 43, wherein the sampling device includes an apparatus for at least one of collecting and storing a biological sample of the individual. 
     47. A method for determining a dosage of at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone to be administered to an individual, comprising the steps of: obtaining a biological sample of the individual; and determining a CYP2D6 phenotype of the individual using the kit of embodiment 43, wherein the dosage is reduced if the CYP2D6 phenotype is consistent with that of a poor metabolizer. 
     48. The method of embodiment 47, wherein the individual is suffering from at least one of a disorder and a disease. 
     49. The method of embodiment 47, wherein the individual is suffering from at least one of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, depression, bipolar mania/depression, cardiac arrhythmia, Tourette&#39;s Syndrome, a psychotic disorder, a delusional disorder, and schizophreniform disorder. 
     50. The method of embodiment 49, wherein the patient is suffering from at least one of paranoid schizophrenia, catatonic schizophrenia, disorganized schizophrenia, undifferentiated schizophrenia, and residual schizophrenia. 
     51. The method of embodiment 49, wherein the patient is suffering from at least one of brief psychotic disorder, a psychotic disorder NOS, a psychotic disorder due to a general medical condition, and a substance-induced psychotic disorder. 
     52. A method for obtaining regulatory approval for a pharmaceutical composition including at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone, comprising: including in proposed prescribing information instructions to determine whether a patient is a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer prior to determining a dosage to administer to the patient. 
     53. The method of embodiment 52, wherein the patient is determined to be a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer based on at least one of the patient&#39;s genotype, the patient&#39;s phenotype, and the fact that the patient is being treated with an agent that reduces CYP2D6 activity. 
     54. The method of embodiment 52, wherein the instructions describe a method for determining the patient&#39;s CYP2D6 genotype, the method comprising: administering to the patient a quantity of at least one of iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone; determining a first concentration of at least one of iloperidone and an iloperidone metabolite in the patient&#39;s blood; administering to the patient at least one CYP2D6 inhibitor; determining a second concentration of at least one of iloperidone and an iloperidone metabolite in the patient&#39;s blood; and comparing the first and second concentrations. 
     55. A method for commercializing a pharmaceutical composition comprising at least one of: iloperidone, a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of iloperidone, an active metabolite of iloperidone, and a pharmaceutically acceptable salt of an active metabolite of iloperidone, said method comprising: obtaining regulatory approval of the composition by providing data to a regulatory agency demonstrating that the composition is effective in treating humans when administered in accordance with instructions to determine whether or not a patient is a CYP2D6 poor metabolizer prior to determining what dose to administer to the patient; and disseminating information concerning the use of such composition in such manner to prescribers or patients or both. 
     While this invention has been described in conjunction with the specific embodiments outlined above, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the embodiments of the invention as set forth above are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the following claims.