Patent Publication Number: US-8995086-B2

Title: Write head with floating side shields and enhanced magnetic potential

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED PATENT APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/510,349, filed Jul. 28, 2009, now allowed, which is a divisional application claiming the benefit under 35 USC 121 from U.S. application Ser. No. 11/483,408 the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein, which application is an application claiming the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/697,582, filed Jul. 8, 2005, entitled “Floating Side Shields for Write Heads”, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein and this application is also an application claiming the benefit under 35 USC 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/709,578, filed Aug. 19, 2005, entitled “Floating Side Shields for Write Heads”, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates generally to media write heads having at least one floating side shield and, in particular embodiments, to disk drive write heads with floating side shields that reduce fringe field effects on neighboring tracks during the performance of a write operation, and methods to manufacture such write heads. 
     2. Related Art 
     Disk drives are used in a variety of electronic devices, ranging from personal computers to portable media players, for the storage and retrieval of data. In a disk drive, data is typically written to and read from magnetic storage media called disks. A disk drive typically comprises a plurality of disks for the storage of data and one or more read/write heads for the reading and writing of data. There is a constant market demand to increase the data storage density of disks. Increasing the storage density of the disks can decrease the price to storage-capacity ratio of the disk drives, increase performance, and decrease the physical dimensions of the disk drive. 
     The write head typically comprises a pole tip, a yoke supporting the write pole tip, and conductive coils around the yoke for electrically magnetizing the write pole tip. During a write operation where the disk drive changes the storage state of a bit of data on the disk, the write head is moved to the location of the bit of data such that the pole tip is positioned directly above the bit, an electric current is passed through the coils to magnetize the pole tip, which in turn causes the magnetization of the bit to change. 
     In recent years, perpendicular recording has been introduced to achieve greater data storage density for disk drives. In perpendicular recording, the magnetization of each bit is aligned vertically, perpendicular to the disk surface. Compared to longitudinal recording, a perpendicular recording system allows more data bits per unit of disk surface area, which in turn enables greater data storage density for the disk drives. 
     On the surface of a disk, the data bits are arranged in concentric circles called tracks. As the area needed for each bit decreases, the track width also decreases, thus increasing the number of tracks per inch and the storage density of the disk. However, as the tracks become more closely spaced, a problem arises when the fringe magnetic field emitted by the write pole tip during a write operation affects the magnetic storage state of bits on a neighboring track. The fringe field can cause inadvertent erasures on neighboring tracks, or enhance thermal decay of adjacent tracks. These effects could cause data loss, a decrease in data storage reliability, or catastrophic failures to the disk drive. 
     In light of the problem discussed above, it is therefore preferable to have a write head design that reduces the fringe fields emitted by the write pole tip. One method of producing such a write head is proposed by U.S. Pat. No. 4,935,832, which discloses side shields connected to a downstream pole of the write head for the reduction of fringe fields emitted from the write pole tip. 
     The side shield design disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,935,832 is difficult to manufacture due to the difficulty in controlling the gap distance between the side shields and the write pole tip, in addition to the need to define the gap distance between the write pole tip and the write shield (return shield). Since the write pole tip and the write shield (to which the side shields are attached to) are manufactured in separate steps, it is impractical to accurately define the gap distances between the write pole tip, write shield, and side shields using the current manufacturing techniques. 
     In addition, the structure disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,935,832 has another disadvantage of creating magnetic flux leakage from the write pole tip. During a write operation, the write pole tip is highly magnetized and thus have a relatively high magnetic potential (V_WP). The magnetic potential of the write shield (return shield) is usually at a very low value creating a return path for the magnetic flux. Since the side shields and the write shield are connected, the side shields have substantially similar magnetic potentials as the very low magnetic potential of the write shield. Hence, there is likely a leakage of magnetic flux from the write pole tip to the side shields. This side-shield leakage is proportional to the difference between the potential of the write pole tip (V_WP) and the potential of the side shields (V_SS). During a write operation, this potential difference between V_WP and V_SS can be large, causing a large amount of magnetic flux leakage from the write pole tip to the side shields. This flux leakage decreases the overall efficiency of the write head because more current is needed to induce sufficient magnetic field to achieve the write operation. The side-shield leakage is also inversely proportional to the gap distance between the side shield and the write pole tip. Thus, increasing the gap distance between the side shield and the write pole tip can reduce side-shield leakage. However, if this gap distance is larger than the track-to-track pitch of the disk, the side shield will cease to protect adjacent tracks from fringe field effects. Therefore, using a design in which the side shields are connected to and magnetically coupled with the write shield, magnetic flux leakage from the write pole tip to the side shields is likely unavoidable. 
     Therefore, embodiments of the present invention relate to creating a write pole tip with side shields which reduces fringe field effects on adjacent tracks but also reduces side-shield leakage, utilizing a manufacturing process easily controllable with the current manufacturing techniques. 
     SUMMARY OF THE DISCLOSURE 
     Embodiments of the present invention relate generally to disk drive write heads with one or more floating side shields that shield adjacent tracks of the disk from fringe field effects, and methods to manufacture such write heads. 
     A write head according to a general embodiment of the present invention is suited for perpendicularly recording data in adjacent magnetic recording media, said media comprising a magnetic recording layer and a soft underlayer (SUL). The write head comprises a pole tip, a write yoke connected to the pole tip, a write return yoke, a write shield, one or more conductive coils surrounding the write yoke, and one or more side shields disposed in close proximity to the pole tip. The write return yoke connects to the write yoke on one end and the write shield on a different end. The one or more side shields are separated from the pole tip and write shields by a non-magnetic material. Hence, in this general embodiment, the side shields are “floating” and not directly magnetically coupled with the write shield or pole tip. 
     In various embodiments, the one or more side shields comprises two side shields disposed in parallel to the write shield, and on opposite sides of the pole tip. In some embodiments, the two side shields are separated from the pole tip by an equal gap distance. 
     In various embodiments, the one or more side shields are encased in non-magnetic material. 
     In various embodiments, the magnetic potential of each of the one or more side shields is higher than the magnetic potential of the write shield during a write operation. 
     In various embodiments, the one or more side shields are dimensioned and spaced such that each of the one or more side shields has a magnetic potential higher than a magnetic potential of the write shield but an induced field in the media from each of the one or more side shields is lower than the nucleation field of the magnetic recording layer during a write operation. 
     In various embodiments, the height of each side shield is longer than the neck length of the pole tip. The height of the side shield is measured along the edge of the side shield substantially parallel to and in closest proximity to the pole tip. 
     In various embodiments, the gap distance between the pole tip and side shields is between 10% to 40% of a track pitch of the magnetic recording layer, and the gap distance is also larger than 50% of the pole tip to soft underlayer (SUL) distance during a write operation. The track pitch is measured by the distance from the middle of one track to the middle of its immediate neighboring track. 
     In various embodiments, the side shields are dimensioned and spaced such that the magnetic flux leakage from the pole tip to the side shields account for less than 20% of the total magnetic flux flowing through the pole tip, during a write operation. 
     In various embodiments, each side shield is connected to the write shield by a magnetic connector, wherein the cross-sectional width of each magnetic connector is less than the width of the side shield. The width of the side shield is measured by the edge of the side shield substantially parallel to and closest to the write shield. 
     In various alternate embodiments, instead of a non-magnetic material separating each of the one or more side shields from the write shield, the material separating each side shield from the write shield may be magnetic with low saturation magnetization or low permeability. In such embodiments, a potential of each side shield may still be higher than a potential of the write shield. Also, in some alternate embodiments, the material separating each of the one or more side shields from the write shield may be magnetic with low saturation magnetization or low permeability such that a drop of magnetic potential from the write shield to each side shield is at least 25% of a potential difference from the write shield to the SUL of the magnetic recording media. 
     Moreover, in various alternate embodiments, instead of a non-magnetic material separating each of the one or more side shields from the pole tip, the material separating each side shield from the pole tip may be magnetic with low saturation magnetization or low permeability. In some alternate embodiments, a material separating each side shield from the pole tip may be magnetic with low saturation magnetization or low permeability and a particular material separating each side shield from the write shield may be magnetic with low saturation magnetization or low permeability. For various such alternate embodiments, low saturation magnetization and low permeability limits for a suitable magnetic material to separate the one or more side shields from the pole tip may be different than low saturation magnetization and low permeability limits for a suitable particular magnetic material to separate the one or more side shields from the write shield. 
     A disk drive device according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises one or more recording medium and one or more magnetic head supported for perpendicular recording on the one or more recording medium. Each recording medium comprising a soft underlayer (SUL) supporting a magnetic recording layer. Each magnetic head comprises a pole tip, a write yoke connected to the pole tip, a write return yoke, a write shield, one or more electrically conductive coils surrounding the write yoke, and one or more side shields disposed in close proximity to the pole tip. The write return yoke connects to the write yoke on one end and the write shield on a different end. Each side shield is separated from the pole tip and write shield by a non-magnetic material. In various alternate embodiments, instead of a non-magnetic material separating each side shield from the write shield, the material separating each side shield from the write shield may be magnetic with low saturation magnetization or low permeability. 
     A method for manufacturing a magnetic head for a disk drive according to an embodiment of the present invention comprises the steps of depositing a first non-magnetic spacer layer, depositing a plating seed layer, plating at least one side shield and a pole tip layer on the first non-magnetic spacer layer, depositing a layer of a first non-magnetic material using ion-beam assisted deposition, and planarizing using a chemical-mechanical polishing step. The side shields and the pole tip layer are defined by a common mask, and are separated by a trench. 
     In various embodiments, the ion-beam assisted deposition is a normal incident ion-beam assisted deposition, and the trench between the side shields and the pole tip is completely filled by said deposition. 
     In various other embodiments, the ion-beam assisted deposition is an angled-incident ion-beam assisted deposition, and the method of manufacturing the magnetic head further comprises the step of filling trench between the side shields and the pole tip using an electro-plating process. In one embodiment, the angled-incident ion-beam assisted deposition is processed using a +/−20 degree angle. In another embodiment, the method of manufacturing the magnetic head further comprises a step of a normal-incident ion milling to expose the plating seed layer on the bottom of the trench between the at least one side shield and the pole tip, said step of the ion milling occurring subsequent to the step of the angled-incident ion-beam assisted deposition and before the step of electro-plating. 
     In various other embodiments, the method of manufacturing the magnetic head further comprises the steps of depositing a write yoke layer on the pole tip layer, said write yoke layer covering the pole tip layer except in a pole tip region; depositing a second non-magnetic spacer layer uniformly over the pole tip layer and write yoke layer; depositing a non-magnetic ramp on the second non-magnetic spacer layer encasing conductive coils; and, depositing a magnetic layer on the nonmagnetic ramp and second non-magnetic spacer layer to form a write shield and write return yoke. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  illustrates a simplified top view of a disk drive; 
         FIG. 2  illustrates a typical read/write head; 
         FIG. 3  illustrates the pole tip region of a typical write head,  FIG. 3(   a ) illustrates a frontal view, and  FIG. 3(   b ) illustrates a bottom (ABS) view; 
         FIG. 4  illustrates the pole tip region of a write head with side shields connected to the write shield,  FIG. 4(   a ) illustrates a frontal view, and  FIG. 4(   b ) illustrates a bottom (ABS) view; 
         FIG. 5  illustrates the pole tip region of a write head with floating side shields according to one embodiment of the present invention,  FIG. 5(   a ) illustrates a frontal view, and  FIG. 5(   b ) illustrates a bottom (ABS) view; 
         FIG. 6  illustrates the pole tip region of a write head according to another embodiment of the present invention,  FIG. 6(   a ) illustrates a frontal view, and  FIG. 6(   b ) illustrates a bottom (ABS) view; 
         FIG. 7  illustrates the pole tip region of a write head according to yet another embodiment of the present invention,  FIG. 7(   a ) illustrates a frontal view, and  FIG. 7(   b ) illustrates a bottom (ABS) view; 
         FIGS. 8(   a ) and  8 ( b ) illustrate the processing steps for one method of depositing non-magnetic material between the side shields and the pole-tip; 
         FIGS. 9(   a ),  9 ( b ), and  9 ( c ) illustrate a method of depositing non-magnetic material between the side shields and the pole-tip according to an embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIGS. 10(   a )-( e ) illustrate another method of depositing non-magnetic material between the side shields and the pole-tip according to another embodiment of the present invention; 
         FIG. 11  illustrates a process layers near the pole tip region of a pole tip according to an embodiment of the present invention. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     Reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which assist in illustrating the various pertinent features of the present invention. Although the present invention will now be described primarily in conjunction with disk drives, it should be expressly understood that the present invention may be applicable to other applications where magnetic recording of data is required/desired. In this regard, the following description of a disk drive is presented for purposes of illustration and description. Furthermore, the description is not intended to limit the invention to the form disclosed herein. Consequently, variations and modifications commensurate with the following teachings, and skill and knowledge of the relevant art, are within the scope of the present invention. The embodiments described herein are further intended to explain best modes known of practicing the invention and to enable others skilled in the art to utilize the invention in such, or other embodiments and with various modifications required by the particular application(s) or use(s) of the present invention. 
     Embodiments of the present invention relates to write head designs which utilizes a floating side shield to reduce or eliminate magnetic fringe fields emitted by the pole tip. Such a write head is used in the read/write head of a disk drive  10 . 
       FIG. 1  illustrates one embodiment of a disk drive  10 . The disk drive  10  generally includes a base plate  12  and a cover (not shown) that may be disposed on the base plate  12  to define an enclosed housing or space for the various disk drive components. The disk drive  10  includes one or more data storage disks  14  of any appropriate computer-readable data storage media. Typically, both of the major surfaces of each data storage disk  14  include a plurality of concentrically disposed tracks for data storage purposes. Each disk  14  is mounted on a hub or spindle  16 , which in turn is rotatably interconnected with the disk drive base plate  12  and/or cover. Multiple data storage disks  14  are typically mounted in vertically spaced and parallel relation on the spindle  16 . Rotation of the disk(s)  14  is provided by a spindle motor  18  that is coupled to the spindle  16  to simultaneously spin the data storage disk(s)  14  at an appropriate rate. 
     The disk drive  10  also includes an actuator arm assembly  20  that pivots about a pivot bearing  22 , which in turn is rotatably supported by the base plate  12  and/or cover. The actuator arm assembly  20  includes one or more individual rigid actuator arms  24  that extend out from near the pivot bearing  22 . Multiple actuator arms  24  are typically disposed in vertically spaced relation, with one actuator arm  24  being provided for each major data storage surface of each data storage disk  14  of the disk drive  10 . Other types of actuator arm assembly configurations could be utilized as well, such as an “E” block having one or more rigid actuator arm tips or the like that cantilever from a common structure. In any case, movement of the actuator arm assembly  20  is provided by an actuator arm drive assembly, such as a voice coil motor  26  or the like. The voice coil motor  26  is a magnetic assembly that controls the operation of the actuator arm assembly  20  under the direction of control electronics  28 . Any appropriate actuator arm assembly drive type may be utilized by the disk drive  10 , including a linear drive (for the case where the actuator arm assembly  20  is interconnected with the base plate  12  and/or cover for linear movement versus the illustrated pivoting movement about the pivot bearing  22 ) and other types of rotational drives. 
     A load beam or suspension  30  is attached to the free end of each actuator arm  24  and cantilevers therefrom. Typically, the suspension  30  is biased generally toward its corresponding disk  14  by a spring-like force. A slider  32  is disposed at or near the free end of each suspension  30 . What is commonly referred to as the “head” (e.g., transducer) is appropriately mounted on the slider  32  and is used in disk drive read/write operations. 
     The head on the slider  32  may utilize various types of read sensor technologies such as anisotropic magnetoresistive (AMR), giant magnetoresistive (GMR), tunneling magnetoresistive (TuMR), other magnetoresistive technologies, or other suitable technologies. AMR is due to the anisotropic magnetoresistive effect with a normalized change in resistance (AR/R) of 2-4%. GMR results from spin-dependent scattering mechanisms between two (or more) magnetic layers. The typical use in recording heads is the spin valve device that uses a pinned magnetic layer and a free layer to detect external fields. The normalized change in resistance is typically 8-12%, but can be as large as 15-20% when used with specular capping layers and spin-filter layers. TuMR is similar to GMR, but is due to spin dependent tunneling currents across an isolation layer. The typical embodiment includes a free layer and a pinned layer separated by a insulating layer of Al 2 O 3  with the current flowing perpendicular to the film plane, producing normalized change in resistance of 12-25%. The term magnetoresistive is used in this application to refer to all these types of magnetoresistive sensors and any others in which a variation in resistance of the sensor due to the application of an external magnetic field is detected. The write transducer technology of the head of the present invention is discussed in further detail below. 
     The biasing forces exerted by the suspension  30  on its corresponding slider  32  thereby attempt to move the slider  32  in the direction of its corresponding disk  14 . Typically, this biasing force is such that if the slider  32  were positioned over its corresponding disk  14 , without the disk  14  being rotated at a sufficient velocity, the slider  32  would be in contact with the disk  14 . 
     The head on the slider  32  is interconnected with the control electronics  28  of the disk drive  10  by a flex cable  34  that is typically mounted on the actuator arm assembly  20 . Signals are exchanged between the head and its corresponding data storage disk  14  for disk drive read/write operations. In this regard, the voice coil motor  26  is utilized to pivot the actuator arm assembly  20  to simultaneously move the slider  32  along a path  36  and “across” the corresponding data storage disk  14  to position the head at the desired/required radial position on the disk  14  (i.e., at the approximate location of the correct track on the data storage disk  14 ) for disk drive read/write operations. 
     When the disk drive  10  is not in operation, the actuator arm assembly  20  is pivoted to a “parked position” to dispose each slider  32  generally at or beyond a perimeter of its corresponding data storage disk  14 , but in any case in vertically spaced relation to its corresponding disk  14 . This is commonly referred to in the art as being a dynamic load/unload disk drive configuration. In this regard, the disk drive  10  includes a ramp assembly  38  that is disposed beyond a perimeter of the data storage disk  14  to typically both move the corresponding slider  32  vertically away from its corresponding data storage disk  14  and to also exert somewhat of a retaining force on the actuator arm assembly  20 . Any configuration for the ramp assembly  38  that provides the desired “parking” function may be utilized. The disk drive  10  could also be configured to be of the contact start/stop type, where the actuator arm assembly  20  would pivot in a direction to dispose the slider(s)  32  typically toward an inner, non-data storage region of the corresponding data storage disk  14 . Terminating the rotation of the data storage disk(s)  14  in this type of disk drive configuration would then result in the slider(s)  32  actually establishing contact with or “landing” on its corresponding data storage disk  14 , and the slider  32  would remain on the disk  14  until disk drive operations are re-initiated. 
     The slider  32  of the disk drive  10  may be configured to “fly” on an air bearing during rotation of its corresponding data storage disk(s)  14  at a sufficient velocity. The slider  32  may be disposed at a pitch angle such that its leading edge is disposed further from its corresponding data storage disk  14  than its trailing edge. The head would typically be incorporated on the slider  32  generally toward its trailing edge since this is positioned closest to its corresponding disk  14 . Other pitch angles/orientations could also be utilized for flying the slider  32 . 
       FIG. 2  illustrates a head  33  that is mounted on the slider  32 . The head  33  comprises a read head  40  and a write head  50 . The read head  40  comprises a read sensor  41 , and read shields  44  and  45 . The write head  50  comprises a pole tip  51  connected to a write yoke  56 , a write return yoke  55  connected to the write yoke  56  on one end, and the write return yoke  55  connected to a write shield (return shield) on a second end. Furthermore, the write head  50  comprises conductive coils  58  surrounding the write yoke  56  for the generation of a magnetic field. When an electric current is passed through the conductive coils  58 , the current induces a magnetic field in the write yoke  56 , which causes the pole tip  51  to become magnetized.  FIG. 2  illustrates the state of the head  33  while the disk drive  10  is in operation. During a write or a read operation, the head  33  is positioned in close proximity to the disk  14 , separated by an air-bearing-surface (ABS)  60 . The disk  14  comprises a soft underlayer (SUL)  141  supporting a magnetic storage layer  143 . 
     During a write operation of the disk drive, the slider  32  moves to a position where the head  33  is positioned directly above the region of the disk  14  corresponding to a bit of data, where the write head  50  and the disk  14  is separated by an air-bearing-surface (ABS)  60 . A current flows through the conductive coils  58  of the write head  50  generating a magnetic field in the write yoke  56 . The magnetization in the write yoke  56  causes the pole tip  51  to become magnetized. The SUL  141  is typically composed of a magnetically soft material with higher magnetic permeability compared to the material of the magnetic storage layer  143 . As a result of the higher permeability of the SUL  141 , the magnetic flux  80  from the pole tip  51  passes vertically through the magnetic storage layer  143  to the SUL  141 . The magnetic flux  80  then passes through the SUL  141  and returns to the write return yoke  55  (return path). Because the tip area of the pole tip  51  is small, the magnetic flux  80  density is high in the region of the magnetic storage layer  143  positioned immediately under the pole tip  51 ; hence, the magnetic flux  80  is capable of causing a change of the storage state of a bit of data. By comparison, because the return path is wider in surface area, the magnetic flux density on the return path is lower since it is distributed over a wide area. Therefore, the storage state of the magnetic storage layer  143  on the return path remains unchanged. 
     As the pole tip  51  emits the magnetic flux  80  during a write operation, the pole tip  51  also emits magnetic flux onto neighboring tracks (fringe field), which could potentially cause inadvertent erasure on the neighboring tracks, or enhance thermal decay of adjacent tracks. 
       FIGS. 3-7  illustrates details of the tip region within the dashed oval area labeled “Tip Region” of  FIG. 2 . Each of  FIGS. 3(   a )- 7 ( a ) illustrates a frontal view of the tip region, as viewed from the left edge of  FIG. 2  towards the right edge. Each of  FIGS. 3(   b )- 7 ( b ) illustrates a bottom view, as viewed from the perspective of the ABS  60 , or as viewed from the bottom edge of  FIG. 2  towards the top edge. 
       FIG. 3  illustrates the structures of the tip region in a design without side shields.  FIG. 3(   a ) is a frontal view of the pole tip  1 - 51 . The pole tip  1 - 51  connects to the write yoke  1 - 56 , but is smaller in dimension. The write yoke  1 - 56  narrows down in a trapezoidal-shaped neck region to connect to the write pole tip  1 - 51 . The height of the pole tip  1 - 51  is called the pole tip neck length (PL). The pole tip  1 - 51  is separated from the disk  14  by an air-bearing-surface (ABS)  60 . The disk  14  comprises a magnetic storage layer  143  supported by a SUL  141 , as previously discussed in reference to  FIG. 2 .  FIG. 3(   b ) illustrates a bottom view (ABS view). The pole tip  1 - 51  is closed spaced from the write shield (return shield)  1 - 53 , separated by a write pole tip gap (WP). 
       FIG. 4  illustrates the region around the pole tip in a design with side shields  2 - 59  connected to the write shield  2 - 53 .  FIG. 4(   a ) is a frontal view of the pole tip  2 - 51 . On both the left and right sides of the pole tip  2 - 51 , two side shields  2 - 59  are disposed in close proximity to the pole tip  2 - 51 , each separated by a side shield to pole tip gap (SG) distance.  FIG. 4(   b ) illustrates the bottom (ABS) view of  FIG. 4(   a ). As shown in  FIG. 4(   b ), the side shields  2 - 59  extends from and are connected to the write shield  2 - 53 . 
     In a manufacturing process, the pole tip  2 - 51  and write shield  2 - 53  are manufactured in two separate steps. Since the side shields  2 - 59  and write shield  2 - 53  are connected as one structure, they must be manufactured together. Therefore, the manufacturing of the structure shown in  FIG. 4  is extremely difficult because the SG dimension (side shield to pole tip gap) is difficult to control when the side shields  2 - 59  and pole tip  2 - 51  are manufactured in separate process steps. 
     Furthermore, as shown in  FIG. 4(   b ), the side shields  2 - 59  and write shield  2 - 53  are connected together throughout the width of the side shields  2 - 59 , hence they are coupled together magnetically and have substantially the same magnetic potential. Because the side shields  2 - 59  are disposed in close proximity to the pole tip  2 - 51 , and have substantially similar magnetic potential as the write shield  2 - 53 , it is likely that magnetic flux from the pole tip  2 - 51  would be leaked to the side shields  2 - 59  in the design shown in  FIG. 4 . This decreases the efficiency of the write head  50 . 
       FIG. 5  illustrates one embodiment of the invention where the side shields  3 - 59  are “floating” and not connected to the write shield  3 - 53 .  FIG. 5(   a ) illustrates a frontal view and  FIG. 5(   b ) illustrates an ABS view. Each side shield  3 - 59  has a height of SH, and is separated from the pole tip  3 - 51  by a gap distance of SG. As illustrated in  FIG. 5(   b ), each side shields  3 - 59  also has a width of SW that is less than the overall width of the write shield  3 - 53 . Each side shield  3 - 59  is also separated from the write shield  3 - 53  by the same gap distance as the pole tip to write shield gap (WG). 
     The embodiment illustrated in  FIG. 5  has the advantage that since the side shields  3 - 59  are not connected to the write shield  3 - 53 , the side shields  3 - 59  can be manufactured in the same process step and defined by the same photolithography mask as the pole tip  3 - 51 . Since the side shields  3 - 59  and the pole tip  3 - 51  are defined in the same mask step, the gap distance (SG) between the side shields  3 - 59  and the pole tip  3 - 51  can be controlled precisely. 
     Furthermore, the embodiment illustrated in  FIG. 5  has the advantage that the magnetic potential of the side shields  3 - 59  can be controlled by adjusting the dimensions of the side shields (SH and SW), the gap distances SG and WG. When the write head  50  is performing a write operation, the pole tip  3 - 51  becomes highly magnetized and hence has a high magnetic potential. The write shield  3 - 53  has a low magnetic potential (close to  0 ). As previously discussed, when the side shields  3 - 59  have a lower magnetic potential than the pole tip  3 - 51 , some amount of magnetic flux will be leaked from the pole tip  3 - 51  to the side shields  3 - 53 . The amount of magnetic flux leakage is directly proportional to the magnetic potential difference between the pole tip  3 - 51  and the side shields  3 - 53 . Therefore, it is desirable to have the side shields  3 - 59  with a magnetic potential at a higher level than that of the write shield  3 - 53  and relatively close to the potential of the pole tip  3 - 51  to minimize the amount of magnetic flux leakage while still protecting adjacent tracks from fringe field effects. However, it is desirable that an induced field in the magnetic storage layer  143  due to the magnetic potential of the side shields  3 - 59  not exceed the nucleation field of the magnetic storage layer  143 . Otherwise, the side shields  3 - 59  would cause undesired erasures on adjacent tracks. Therefore, an optimum magnetic potential for the side shields  3 - 59  is a magnetic potential higher than that of the write shield  3 - 53  and that induces a field in the magnetic storage layer  143  close to but lower than the nucleation field of the magnetic storage layer  143 . 
     In the embodiment illustrated in  FIG. 5 , since the side shields  3 - 59  are “floating” and not directly coupled to any structure with a predetermined magnetic potential, the magnetic potential of the side shields  3 - 59  are influenced by the magnetic potentials of nearby structures. The magnetic potential of each side shield  3 - 59  is proportional to the magnetic potential of a nearby structure, proportional to the surface area of the side shield  3 - 59  facing that nearby structure, and inversely proportional to the gap distance between the side shield  3 - 59  and that nearby structure. Therefore, for example, if it is more desirable to have the side shields  3 - 59  have a magnetic potential closer to the write shield  3 - 53  (which has a magnetic potential close to 0), the area of the side shields  3 - 59  facing the write shield  3 - 53  can be increased by increasing the width of the side shields (SW). On the other hand, if it is more desirable to increase the magnetic potential of the side shields  3 - 59 , the area of the side shields  3 - 59  facing the pole tip  3 - 51  can be increased by increasing the side shield height (SH), or decreasing the gap (SG) between the side shields and the pole tip  3 - 51 . 
     By a method of finite element analysis or SPICE simulation (in which the magnetic impedances of the gaps are simulated as resistances), it is possible to design the dimensions of the side shields  3 - 59  illustrated in  FIG. 5  such that the magnetic potential of the side shields  3 - 59  is any desired value above 0 and below the magnetic potential of the pole tip  3 - 51 . In some embodiments of the present invention, the desired value can be set at an optimum magnetic potential just below the nucleation field of the magnetic storage layer  143 . 
     Since the magnetic flux leakage from the pole tip  3 - 51  to the side shields  3 - 59  is proportional to their magnetic potential difference, it is therefore also possible to adjust the dimensions of the side shields  3 - 59  and the gap distances (WG and SG) such that the magnetic flux leakage is less than 20%. 
     In some embodiments, the width of the pole tip  3 - 51  is approximately 80% of the track pitch (track-to-track distance on the disk  14 ). The side shield to pole tip gap (SG) is approximately 10-40% of the track pitch to protect fringe field effects on neighboring tracks. The side shield to pole tip gap (SG) should also be larger than 50% of the pole tip  3 - 51  to SUL  141  distance, to ensure that the magnetic flux emitted from the pole tip  3 - 51  goes to the SUL  141  rather than the side shields  3 - 59 . Within these dimensional constraints, it is possible to adjust the height (SH) and width (SW) of the side shields  3 - 59  to achieve the desired magnetic potential for the side shields to be at a level near the optimum level. 
       FIG. 6  illustrates another embodiment of the present invention comprising a magnetic connector  4 - 52  connecting each side shield  4 - 53  to the write shield  4 - 53 .  FIG. 6(   a ) illustrates a frontal view and  FIG. 6(   b ) illustrates a bottom (ABS) view. The cross-sectional width of each magnetic connector  4 - 52  is less than the width of the side shield (SW) to which it is connected. In this embodiment, since the magnetic connection area between each side shield  4 - 53  and the write shield  4 - 53  is relatively small, the magnetic coupling between the side shields  4 - 53  and the write shield  4 - 53  is relatively weak. Since each side shield  4 - 53  is disposed in close proximity to the pole tip  4 - 51 , the magnetic potential of each side shield will be a value above the magnetic potential of the write shield but below the magnetic potential of the pole tip  4 - 51 . Thus, in this embodiment, the magnetic potential of the side shields  4 - 59  can be adjusted by adjusting the cross-sectional width of the magnetic connectors  4 - 52 , which determines the amount of magnetic coupling between the side shields  4 - 52  and the write shield  4 - 53 . 
     In some embodiments, each magnetic connector  4 - 52  is composed of a magnetic thin film. In some embodiments, each magnetic connector  4 - 52  is a magnetic via. 
       FIG. 7  illustrates yet another embodiment of the present invention.  FIG. 7(   a ) illustrates a frontal view and  FIG. 7(   b ) illustrates a bottom (ABS) view. In this embodiment, the width (SW) of each side shield  5 - 59  is made relatively small. However, the height of each side shield  5 - 59  is made longer than the pole tip neck length (PL). In this embodiment, the magnetic coupling between the side shields  5 - 59  and the write shield  5 - 53  is small since only a small amount of surface area of each side shield  5 - 59  directly faces the write shield  5 - 53 . However, there is a large amount of magnetic coupling between the side shields  5 - 59  and the pole-tip/yoke structure (elements  5 - 56  and  5 - 51 ) due to the large amount of side shield  3 - 59  surface area facing it. In this embodiment, the magnetic potential of the side shields can be maintained at a relatively high value. 
       FIGS. 8-11  illustrate methods of manufacturing a write pole tip with floating side shields according to various embodiments of the present invention.  FIGS. 8-10  illustrate various manufacturing methods for the structure of the pole tip, while  FIG. 11  illustrate the overall structure of the pole tip region. 
       FIG. 8  illustrates one conventional method of manufacturing the pole tip  6 - 51  and side shields  6 - 59 . A layer of seeding layer  6 - 71  is first deposited on a non-magnetic spacer layer  6 - 70 . Various other structures for the head  33  are positioned below the non-magnetic spacer layer  6 - 70 , some of which will be discussed later in reference to  FIG. 11 . After the deposition of the seeding layer  6 - 71 , the side shields  6 - 59  and pole tip  6 - 51  are plated onto the seeding layer  6 - 71 . The region where the side shields  6 - 59  and pole tip  6 - 51  are plated is defined by a photolithography mask (not shown). The seeding layer  6 - 71  outside of the region where the side shields  6 - 59  and pole tip  6 - 51  are deposited is then removed. As previously discussed, because the side shields  6 - 59  and the pole tip  6 - 51  are defined using the same photolithography mask, this enables precise control of the dimensions of the side shields  6 - 59  as well as the gap distance between the side shields  6 - 59  and pole tip  6 - 51 . 
     In one specific embodiment, the spacer layer  6 - 70  is composed of Al 2 O 3 , the side shields  6 - 59  and pole tip  6 - 59  are composed of NiFe, and the seeding layer  6 - 71  is a copper layer. However, in other embodiments, various other suitable materials can be used. For example, the seeding layer  6 - 71  could be composed of a Copper-Tin alloy or a Copper-Zinc alloy. 
     As shown in  FIG. 8(   b ), after the formation of the side shields  6 - 59  and pole tip  6 - 51 , a non-magnetic encapsulation layer is deposited onto the structure using a sputter deposition process. A sputter deposition process is a relatively fast process where a thick layer can be deposited in a relatively short period of time. However, due to the high aspect ratio (depth/width) of the trench between each side shield  6 - 59  and the pole tip  6 - 51 , a sputter deposition may not be able to completely fill these trenches. As illustrated in  FIG. 8(   b ), voids  6 - 74  could potentially form on the bottom of the trenches. The likelihood of the formation of the voids  6 - 74  depends on the sputter deposition process as well as the aspect ratio of the trenches between each side shield  6 - 59  and pole tip  6 - 51 . However, the formation of voids  6 - 74  is highly undesirable because it could lead to reliability degradation and failures. 
       FIG. 9  illustrates a method to manufacture the pole tip structure eliminating the formation of voids according to one embodiment of the present invention. The process steps that are identical to the process discussed while referring to  FIG. 8  is omitted here. As shown in  FIG. 9(   a ), after the plating of the side shields  7 - 59  and pole tip  7 - 51 , the structure is subject to a normal incident ion-beam deposition process of a non-magnetic material, such as Al 2 O 3 . Since the incident angle of the ion-beam deposition process is normal (90 degrees) to the substrate, the trenches between each side shield  7 - 59  and pole tip  7 - 51  is filled with the non-magnetic material without the risk of void formation. 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 9(   b ), the non-magnetic layer  7 - 76  is deposited at a normal angle over the entire structure, including on top of the side shields  7 - 59  and pole tip  7 - 51 . The structure is then subjected to a chemical-mechanical polishing step for planarization, resulting in a structure shown in  FIG. 9(   c ). 
     As compared to the method described in  FIG. 8 , the current method has the advantage that it eliminates the risk of void-formation on the bottom of the trenches between the side shields  7 - 59  and pole tip  7 - 51 . However, the ion-beam deposition process is a slower process compared to the sputtering process. It takes a relatively long time to form the thick non-magnetic layer  7 - 76  using ion-beam deposition as required by this method. Hence, the current method increases processing time and possibly the processing cost compared to the method described in  FIG. 8 . 
       FIG. 10  illustrates a method according to another embodiment of the present invention where the formation of voids can be avoided without the need for a lengthy ion-beam deposition process. As shown in  FIG. 10(   a ), after the formation of the side shields  7 - 59  and pole tip  7 - 51 , the seeding layer  8 - 71  is not removed and remains even in the exposed regions. The structure is then subjected to an angled incident ion-beam assisted deposition of a non-magnetic material, such as Al 2 O 3 , for a short period of time. In this embodiment, the angle is set at +/−20° from the normal angle. However, in other embodiments, other angles which meets the objective of the present invention can also be used. 
     As shown in  FIG. 10(   b ), a thin layer of non-magnetic material  8 - 76  can be quickly formed over the structure through the angled-incident ion-beam assisted deposition. However, because the ion-beam assisted deposition is at an angle, the bottom of the trenches between the side shields  7 - 59  and pole tip  7 - 51  is not covered by the non-magnetic layer  8 - 76  because the angled ion beams are blocked by nearby structures. Hence, the seeding layer  8 - 71  on the bottom of the trenches between the side shields  7 - 59  and pole tip  7 - 51  remain exposed. 
     In various embodiments, due to scattering effects of angled ion-beam deposition, a very thin layer of magnetic material  8 - 76  may also be formed on the bottom of the trenches between the side shields  7 - 59  and pole tip  7 - 51 . Such a problem can be resolved by subjecting the structure to a light ion-beam milling process, with the ion beam at a normal incident angle to the substrate. Because the layer on the bottom of the trenches is much thinner than in other regions, the seeding layer  8 - 71  on the bottom of the trenches can be exposed without exposing other regions of the seeding layer  8 - 71 . 
     As shown in  FIG. 10(   c ), the structure is then subject to a electro-plating process of a non-magnetic material. Since only the regions of the seeding layer  8 - 71  on the bottom of the trenches between the side shields  7 - 59  and pole tip  7 - 51  are exposed, only the trenches  8 - 78  will be filled by the electro-plating process. The material filling the trenches  8 - 78  must be a non-magnetic material, such as Ni—P alloy (with P&gt;80%), a Copper-Zinc alloy, or a Copper-Tin alloy. 
     After the trenches  8 - 78  are filled with a non-magnetic material, the structure is then subject to a sputtering deposition of a non-magnetic layer  8 - 72 , such as Al 2 O 3 .  FIG. 10(   d ) illustrates the profile of the structure after the deposition of the non-magnetic layer  8 - 72 . The structure is then subject to a chemical-mechanical polishing step for planarization.  FIG. 10(   e ) illustrates the profile of the structure after the chemical-mechanical polishing step. 
     In this embodiment, there is an advantage that only a short ion-beam assisted deposition is required. Hence, as compared to the method described while referring to  FIG. 9 , the process time and expense are reduced. However, because the trenches between the side shields  7 - 59  and pole tip  7 - 51  are filled using a plating process, the risk of void-formation is also eliminated. 
       FIG. 11  illustrates the main processing steps of the layers surrounding the tip region according to an embodiment of the present invention. This discussion focuses on the main process steps relevant to the present invention, and certain conventional steps such as the formation of seed layers, certain photolithography layers, chemical-mechanical polishing, layers for electrical connections, and other process steps are omitted. The perspective of  FIG. 11  is rotated 90 degrees from the perspective shown in  FIGS. 8-10 , viewing the structures in  FIG. 8-10  from the right edge of the figure towards the left edge.  FIG. 11  only illustrates the region near the pole tip, and other structures that are commonly found in a head  33  is omitted. The structure is formed on a substrate (not shown). Typically, the read head  40  is formed in the space between the non-magnetic spacer layer  70  and the underlying substrate (not shown). The left edge of  FIG. 11  illustrates the bottom edge of the write head  50  as shown in  FIG. 5 . The space beyond the left edge of  FIG. 11  is the air-bearing-surface (ABS)  60 . 
     As shown in  FIG. 11 , a non-magnetic spacer layer  70  is deposited, encasing a set of conductive coils  58 . The coils  58  can be a pan-cake type coil (wrapping horizontally with respect to  FIG. 11 ) or a solenoidal-type coil (wrapping vertically with respect to  FIG. 11 ). Next, the pole tip layer  51  and side shields  59  are deposited on the non-magnetic spacer layer  70 . 
     The formation of the pole tip  51  and side shields  59  are accomplished using one of the methods discussed in detail while referring to  FIG. 8 ,  9 , or  10 . In  FIG. 11 , the side shield  59  is obscuring the view of the bottom of the pole tip  51 . It is noted that both the side shield  59  and pole tip  51  extends to the left edge of  FIG. 11 . There is another side shield  59  (not shown) behind the pole tip layer  51 , obscured by both the first side shield  59  and pole tip layer  51 . 
     Next, a thick write yoke layer  56  is deposited over the entire pole tip layer  51  except the region near the tip. The write yoke layer  56  increases the thickness and magnetic flux conductance of the pole tip layer  51 . After the deposition of the write yoke layer  56 , another non-magnetic spacer layer  82  composing Al 2 O 3  is deposited. The thickness of this non-magnetic spacer layer  82  determines the gap distance (WG) between the pole tip  51  and the write shield  53 . On top of non-magnetic spacer layer  82 , a non-magnetic ramp  84  is deposited, covering the region above the write yoke layer  58  and ramping down towards the pole tip (left edge of the figure). The non-magnetic ramp  84  is composed of hard-baked photoresist, and encases a second set of coils  58 . Together, the non-magnetic spacer layer  82  and the non-magnetic ramp  84  separates the pole tip  51  and write yoke  56  from the write shield  53 . Next, a thick layer of magnetic material is deposited over the entire structure, forming the write shield  53  and write return yoke  55 . It is noted that the write yoke  56  ultimately connects to the write return yoke  55 , in the region beyond the right edge of  FIG. 11  (not shown). (See  FIG. 2 ). 
     In various embodiments, each side shield  59  is separated from the write shield  53  by a non-magnetic material. In various alternate embodiments, each side shield  59  is separated from the write shield  53  by a magnetic material having low saturation magnetization or low permeability. Also, in various alternate embodiments, each side shield  59  is separated from the write shield  53  by a magnetic material having low saturation magnetization or low permeability such that, during a write operation, a drop of magnetic potential from the write shield  53  to each side shield  59  is at least 25% of a potential difference from the write shield  53  to a SUL of an adjacent magnetic recording medium. 
     In various embodiments, each side shield  59  is separated from the pole tip  51  by a non-magnetic material. In various alternate embodiments, each side shield  59  is separated from the pole tip  51  by a magnetic material having low saturation magnetization or low permeability. Also, in various alternate embodiments, each side shield  59  is separated from the pole tip  51  by a magnetic material having low saturation magnetization or low permeability and each side shield  59  is separated from the write shield  53  by a magnetic material having low saturation magnetization or low permeability. For various such alternate embodiments, low saturation magnetization and low permeability limits for a suitable magnetic material to separate each side shield  59  from the pole tip  51  may be different than low saturation magnetization and low permeability limits for a suitable particular magnetic material to separate each side shield  59  from the write shield  53 . 
     The embodiments disclosed herein are to be considered in all respects as illustrative, and not restrictive of the invention. The present invention is in no way limited to the embodiments described above. Various modifications and changes may be made to the embodiments without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. The scope of the invention is indicated by the attached claims, rather than the embodiments. Various modifications and changes that come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are intended to be within the scope of the invention.