Patent Publication Number: US-2019170725-A1

Title: Method for estimating sediment content of a hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Technical Field 
     The present invention generally relates to a method for estimating sediment content of a hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     Presently, the petroleum industry relies more heavily on relatively high boiling feedstocks derived from materials such as coal, tar sands, oil-shale, and heavy crudes. These feedstocks generally contain significantly more undesirable components, especially from an environmental point of view. For example, such undesirable components include halides, metals and heteroatoms such as sulfur, nitrogen, and oxygen. Furthermore, specifications for fuels, lubricants, and chemical products, with respect to such undesirable components, are continually becoming stricter. Consequently, such feedstocks and product streams require more severe upgrading in order to reduce the content of such undesirable components. More severe upgrading, of course, adds considerably to the expense of processing these petroleum streams. 
     Hydroprocessing, which includes by way of example, hydroconversion, hydrocracking, hydrotreating, hydrogenation, hydrofinishing and hydroisomerization, plays an important role in upgrading petroleum feedstocks to meet the more stringent quality requirements. For example, there is an increasing demand for improved hetero-atom removal, aromatic saturation, and boiling point reduction as well as removal of metal contaminants such as vanadium and nickel. Much work is presently being done in hydrotreating because of greater demands for the removal of undesirable components such as heteroatoms, most notably sulfur, from transportation and heating fuel streams. Hydrotreating is well known in the art and usually involves treating the petroleum streams with hydrogen in the presence of a supported catalyst at hydrotreating conditions. 
     Hydrocarbon feedstocks likewise generally contain polar core materials, such as asphaltenes, dispersed in lower polarity solvent(s). Intermediate polarity material(s), usually referred to as resin(s), can associate with the polar core materials to maintain a homogeneous mixture of the components. 
     Asphaltenes are organic heterocyclic macromolecules which occur in crude oils. Under normal reservoir conditions, asphaltenes are usually stabilized in the crude oil by maltenes and resins that are chemically compatible with asphaltenes, but that have lower molecular weight. Polar regions of the maltenes and resins surround the asphaltene while non-polar regions are attracted to the oil phase. However, changes in pressure, temperature or concentration of the crude oil can alter the stability of the dispersion and increase the tendency of the asphaltenes to agglomerate into larger particles. As these asphaltene agglomerates grow, so does their tendency to precipitate out of solution. The formation of sediments is related to the asphaltene content in the residue. 
     Presently, there are only a few ways to determine sediment, and they are time-consuming and have a low repeatability. For example, ASTM test method 4870 is used for the determination of total sediment in residual fuels. This test method is time consuming, has several sources of errors and requires constant operator&#39;s attention. It also has a limited application to those residues that can be filtered under the conditions of the method. However, the data obtained from this test method is used for making decisions about operation conditions, activity and life of the catalyst, use of additive, etc. 
     Accordingly, it would be advantageous to provide an improved method for estimating sediment content of a hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock that can be carried out in a simple, cost efficient and repeatable manner. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method comprising the steps of: 
     (a) precipitating an amount of asphaltenes from a liquid sample of a first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock having solvated asphaltenes therein with one or more first solvents in a column; 
     (b) determining one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (c) analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (d) determining asphaltene content of the liquid sample from the results of analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (e) determining one or more asphaltene stability parameters of the liquid sample from the results of analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; and 
     (f) correlating the asphaltene content and one of the asphaltene stability parameters of the liquid sample to estimate sediment content of the liquid sample. 
     In accordance with a second embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method comprising the steps of: 
     (a) precipitating an amount of asphaltenes from a liquid sample of a first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock having solvated asphaltenes therein with one or more first solvents in a column; 
     (b) determining one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (c) analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (d) determining asphaltene content of the liquid sample from the results of analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (e) determining one or more asphaltene stability parameters of the liquid sample from the results of analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (f) correlating the asphaltene content and one of the asphaltene stability parameters of the liquid sample to estimate sediment content of the liquid sample; and 
     (g) selecting a second hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample; repeating steps (a)-(f); and comparing the estimated sediment content of the second hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample with the estimated sediment content of the first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample to predict a leading candidate hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock. 
     In accordance with a third embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method comprising the steps of: 
     (a) precipitating an amount of asphaltenes from a liquid sample of a first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock having solvated asphaltenes therein with one or more first solvents in a column; 
     (b) determining one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (c) analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (d) determining asphaltene content of the liquid sample from the results of analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (e) determining one or more asphaltene stability parameters of the liquid sample from the results of analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; 
     (f) correlating the asphaltene content and one of the asphaltene stability parameters of the liquid sample to estimate sediment content of the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock; and 
     (g) selecting a different sample of the same first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample; repeating steps (a)-(f); and comparing the estimated sediment content of the different sample of the same first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample with the estimated sediment content of the first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample. 
     The methods of the present invention advantageously estimate the sediment content of a hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock in a simple, cost efficient and repeatable manner. In this manner, quality control of a hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock can be achieved to determine a leading candidate hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  shows a comparison between the sediment content calculated by equation (1) and the sediment content determined by ASTM 4870 for samples in Example 1. 
         FIG. 2  a comparison between the sediment content calculated by equation (2) and the sediment content determined by ASTM 4870 for samples in Example 2. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     In one embodiment, a method involves the steps of: (a) precipitating an amount of asphaltenes from a liquid sample of a first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock having solvated asphaltenes therein with one or more first solvents in a column; (b) determining one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; (c) analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; (d) determining asphaltene content of the liquid sample from the results of analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; (e) determining one or more asphaltene stability parameters of the liquid sample from the results of analyzing the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes; and (f) correlating the asphaltene content and one of the asphaltene stability parameters of the liquid sample to estimate sediment content of the liquid sample. 
     Generally, the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock is derived from any hydrocarbon-containing feedstock having solvated asphaltenes therein which has been hydroprocessed according to any known or later discovered hydroprocessing techniques. The source of the hydrocarbon-containing feedstock may be any source where such a hydrocarbon crude may be obtained, produced, or the like. The source may be one or more producing wells in fluid communication with a subterranean oil reservoir. The producing well(s) may be under thermal recovery conditions, or the producing well(s) may be in a heavy oil field where the hydrocarbon crude or oil is being produced from a reservoir having a strong water-drive. 
     In one embodiment, the hydrocarbon-containing feedstock includes any heavy hydrocarbons such as heavy crude oil, heavy hydrocarbons extracted from tar sands, commonly called tar sand bitumen, such as Athabasca tar sand bitumen obtained from Canada, heavy petroleum crude oils such as Venezuelan Orinoco heavy oil belt crudes, Boscan heavy oil, Hamaca crude oil, heavy hydrocarbon fractions obtained from crude petroleum oils, particularly heavy vacuum gas oils, atmospheric residue, vacuum residuum as well as petroleum tar, tar sands and coal tar. Other examples of heavy hydrocarbon feedstocks which can be used are oil shale, shale, coal liquefaction products and the like. 
     In another embodiment, the hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample includes any solid hydrocarbon-containing deposit such as asphaltene solids from, e.g., refinery production preparation or an oil facility. 
     In another embodiment, the hydrocarbon-containing feedstock includes any processed sample such as heavy cycle gas oil (HCGO), LC Fining ebullated bed hydrocracked products, fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) products and the like. 
     In general, the hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks are used as a refinery feedstock in one or more crude hydrocarbon refining components within a refinery and subjected to one or more conventional hydroprocessing techniques such as hydrotreating, hydrocracking, hydrogenation, hydrofinishing and hydroisomerization and the like. Alternatively, one or more of the selected hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks can be blended with one or more of the same or different hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks and then hydroprocessed. The refinery hydroprocesses that the one or more of the selected hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks can be used in are well known in the art. 
     The term “crude hydrocarbon refinery component” generally refers to an apparatus or instrumentality of a process to refine crude hydrocarbons, such as an oil refinery process. Crude hydrocarbon refinery components include, but are not limited to, heat transfer components such as a heat exchanger, a furnace, a crude preheater, a coker preheater, or any other heaters, a FCC slurry bottom, a debutanizer exchanger/tower, other feed/effluent exchangers and furnace air preheaters in refinery facilities, flare compressor components in refinery facilities and steam cracker/reformer tubes in petrochemical facilities. Crude hydrocarbon refinery components can also include other instrumentalities in which heat transfer may take place, such as a fractionation or distillation column, a scrubber, a reactor, a liquid-jacketed tank, a pipestill, a coker and a visbreaker. It is understood that “crude hydrocarbon refinery components,” as used herein, encompass tubes, piping, baffles and other process transport mechanisms that are internal to, at least partially constitute, and/or are in direct fluid communication with, any one of the above-mentioned crude hydrocarbon refinery components. 
     In one embodiment, representative examples of such crude hydrocarbon refinery components include a heat exchanger, a furnace, a crude preheater, a coker preheater, a FCC slurry bottom, a debutanizer exchanger, a debutanizer tower, a feed/effluent exchanger, a furnace air preheater, a flare compressor component, a steam cracker, a steam reformer, a distillation column, a fractionation column, a scrubber, a reactor, a liquid-jacketed tank, a pipestill, a coker, a storage tank, a visbreaker and the like. 
     Once the hydrocarbon-containing feedstock has been hydroprocessed, the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock is then used in the methods of the present invention. Accordingly, a liquid sample of a first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock having solvated asphaltenes therein is first provided. As one skilled in the art will readily understand, it may be necessary to add a solvent to the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock in order for the sample to be sufficiently fluid enough to be passed through the column. Useful solvents include any solvent in which the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample is soluble or which is capable of allowing the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample to be sufficiently fluid to be passed through the column. Representative examples of such solvents include one or more chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents, one or more aromatic hydrocarbon solvents, one or more ether solvents, one or more alcohol solvents and the like and mixtures thereof. 
     Suitable chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents include, but are not limited to, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, chloroform, carbon tetrachloride and the like and mixtures thereof. Suitable aromatic hydrocarbon solvents include, but are not limited to, benzene, toluene, xylene and the like and mixtures thereof. Suitable ether solvents include tetrahydrofuran, diethylether, dioxane and the like and mixtures of thereof. Suitable alcohol solvents include low molecular weight aliphatic alcohols such as methanol, ethanol, isopropanol and the like and mixtures thereof. 
     In one embodiment, the sample solution can be prepared from about 10 to about 50 wt. % solution of the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample in the solvent(s). 
     Initially, at least a portion of the sample solution is injected into a column. Generally, the column will have an inlet and an outlet and can be any type of column which is hollow and permits the flow of an aqueous-type material through the interior of the column. The column can be any size and cross sectional shape, e.g., the column can be cylindrical, square, rectangular, triangular, or any other geometrical shape as long as it is hollow and permits the passing of aqueous-type material. In one embodiment, the column is cylindrical. Furthermore, the column can be of any suitable length and any inner diameter or inner cross-sectional area. In one embodiment, the column can have a diameter of from about 0.25 inches (0.63 cm) to about 1 inch (2.5 cm) and a length of from about 50 mm to about 500 mm. One skilled the art could envisage that the column can generally be any inert filtration device for use in the methods of the present invention. 
     Any suitable material may be selected for use as the column. For example, the column can be formed of a relatively inert or chemically unreactive material such as glass, stainless steel, polyethylene, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyaryletheretherketone, (PEEK), silicon carbide or mixtures of thereof, for example, a PEEK-lined stainless steel column. 
     The column may be vertical or horizontal or arranged in any suitable way, provided that it can be loaded with the sample solution and that the appropriate solvent(s) can be passed through it. As will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, a pump may also be used to increase the flow rate through the column. 
     In another embodiment, an inert packing material is included within the column. The amount of the inert packing material should not exceed an amount which will prevent the passing of any liquid containing material through the column. The packed column advantageously allows for the use of a relatively small volume of sample solution and solvent(s). Suitable inert packing material includes any material that is inert to asphaltene irreversible adsorption. Examples of such materials include fluorinated polymers such as, for example, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF), fluorinated ethylene propylene (FEP), polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), silicon carbide, polydivinylbenzene (PDVB) and the like and mixtures thereof. 
     Once the sample solution has been passed into the column, one or more first solvents are then passed through the column. Useful one or more first solvents are typically alkane mobile phase solvent(s) and can be determined by one skilled in the art. In one embodiment, the alkane mobile phase solvent is n-heptane. However, other alkane mobile phase solvents such as, for example, iso-octane, n-pentane or n-hexane may be used. 
     The one or more first solvents should be passed into the column for a time period sufficient to elute the alkane soluble fraction, commonly known as maltenes or petrolenes, and induce precipitation of the alkane insoluble fraction, i.e., the precipitated asphaltenes, from the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample. Generally, once the alkane mobile phase solvent (i.e., one or more first solvents) enters the column, the alkane mobile phase solvent dilutes and displaces the solvent in the sample solution, thereby allowing the asphaltenes to substantially precipitate therefrom. The alkane soluble fraction then elutes from the column. 
     In accordance with the present invention, one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes are determined once substantially all of the alkane soluble fraction has eluted. The one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes to be determined include, by way of example, solubility parameters, miscibility numbers, kauri-butanol numbers, dipole moments, relative permitivities, polarity indexes, refractive indexes and specific types of intermolecular interaction in liquid media such as acid and base numbers. Various ways to determine the one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes are within the purview of one skilled in the art. For example, solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes can be determined according to the following methods: (1) Solubility Fraction Method; and (2) Solubility Profile Method. 
     Solubility Fraction Method 
     The solubility fraction method involves the step of determining one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes by (1) dissolving at least part of the amount of the precipitated asphaltenes in one or more second solvents having a solubility parameter at least 0.7 MPa 0.5  higher than the one or more first solvents; and (2) dissolving a second amount of the precipitated asphaltenes in one or more third solvents having a solubility parameter higher than the one or more second solvents, wherein the solubility parameter of the one or more third solvents is at least about 21 MPa 0.5  but no greater than about 30 MPa 0.5 . A solubility parameter as described herein is determined by the Hansen&#39;s methodology described in Barton, A. F. M.  Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters ; CRC Press Inc.: Boca Raton, Fla., p. 95 (1983). 
     Suitable one or more second solvents having a solubility parameter at least 0.7 MPa 0.5  higher than the one or more first solvents can be determined by one skilled in the art. Useful solvents include, but are not limited to, one or more alkane solvents, one or more chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents, one or more aromatic solvents, one or more ether solvents, one or more alcohol solvents and the like and mixtures thereof. Representative examples of such solvents can be any of those disclosed above. It is also contemplated that blends of such solvents can be used. In one embodiment, a blend can contain from about 0.5 wt. % to about 99.5 wt. % chlorinated solvent and from about 99.5 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % alkane solvent. In another embodiment, a blend can contain from about 10 wt. % to about 25 wt. % chlorinated solvent and from about 90 wt. % to about 75 wt. % alkane solvent. 
     Suitable one or more third solvents having a solubility parameter higher than the one or more second solvents, wherein the solubility parameter of the one or more third solvents is at least about 21 MPa 0.5  but no greater than about 30 MPa 0.5 , can be determined by one skilled in the art. Generally, the one or more third solvents will dissolve any remaining precipitated asphaltenes in the column. Useful solvents include, but are not limited to, one or more alcohol solvents, one or more chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents, one or more aromatic solvents, one or more ether second solvents and the like and mixtures thereof. Representative examples of such solvents can be any of those disclosed above. It is also contemplated that blends of such solvents can be used. In one embodiment, a blend can contain from about 0.5 wt. % to about 99.5 wt. % chlorinated solvent and from about 99.5 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % alcohol solvent. In another embodiment, a blend can contain from about 80 wt. % to about 95 wt. % chlorinated solvent and from about 20 wt. % to about 5 wt. % alcohol solvent. 
     If desired, one or more additional solvents or solvent blends can be added to dissolve at least part of the amount of the precipitated asphaltenes after the addition of the one or more second solvents and before the addition of the one or more third solvents. In general, the one or more additional solvents or solvent blends will have a solubility parameter greater than the previously added one or more solvents or solvent blends and less than the solubility parameter of the one or more third solvents. For example, one or more fourth solvents having a solubility parameter between the solubility parameter of the one or more second solvents and the solubility parameter of the one or more third solvents can be added to dissolve at least part of the amount of the precipitated asphaltenes. In another embodiment, one or more fifth solvents having a solubility parameter between the solubility parameter of the one or more fourth solvents and the solubility parameter of the one or more third solvents can be added to dissolve at least part of the amount of the precipitated asphaltenes. In yet another embodiment, one or more sixth solvents having a solubility parameter between the solubility parameter of the one or more fifth solvents and the solubility parameter of the one or more third solvents can be added to the dissolve at least part of the amount of the precipitated asphaltenes. 
     Suitable additional solvents include, but are not limited to, one or more alkane solvents, one or more chlorinated hydrocarbon solvents, one or more alcohol solvents, one or more aromatic solvents and the like and mixtures thereof. Representative examples of such solvents can be any of those disclosed above. 
     The asphaltene concentration in the eluted fractions from the column is continuously monitored using, for example, a liquid chromatography detector which generates a signal proportional to the amount of each eluted fraction and is recorded in a manner well known in the art. There are a number of commercially available liquid chromatography detectors that can be used including, e.g., refractive index detectors, mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry, NMR spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, fluorescence spectroscopy, UV-Vis spectroscopy, diode array detector, Charged Aerosol, evaporative light scattering detectors (ELSD) and the like; all of which can be used in the methods described herein. Other online detectors are known to those skilled in the art. Quantification can then be performed using methods known in the art, e.g., using commercially-available computer programs. 
     In one preferred embodiment, an evaporative light scattering detector is used as a liquid chromatography detector to monitor each eluting sample&#39;s concentration to determine the solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes. The operating principle of an evaporative light scattering detector is as follows: the compounds to be analyzed are transported by a mobile phase or a more volatile carrier liquid which is then nebulized and evaporated at a relatively low temperature (being able to be in the order of from about 30 to about 150° C.) so that residual micro-particles alone remain—ideally the compounds to be analyzed—which can be detected by light scattering. In this manner, it is possible to analyze directly effluents which originate from the column under the condition of selecting a mobile phase which is volatile enough to be directly used as a carrier liquid for the evaporative light scattering detector. For example, in the case of the asphaltenes for the asphaltene fraction method, the result is a single peak for each eluted solvent fraction with each peak representing a solubility characteristic of the asphaltenes. 
     Solubility Profile Method 
     The solubility profile method involves the step of determining one or more solubility characteristics of the precipitated asphaltenes by dissolving a first amount and a second amount of the precipitated asphaltenes by gradually and continuously changing the alkane mobile phase solvent to a final mobile phase solvent having a solubility parameter at least 1 MPa 0.5  higher than the alkane mobile phase solvent. Generally, the first amount of the precipitated asphaltenes (also referred to as “easy to dissolve asphaltenes”) will have a lower solubility parameter than the second amount of asphaltenes (also referred to as “hard to dissolve asphaltenes”). The term “gradually” as used herein shall be understood to mean that the alkane mobile phase solvent is incrementally removed from the column over a period of time by continuously adding a final mobile phase solvent having a solubility parameter at least 1 MPa 0.5  higher than the alkane mobile phase solvent to the column. Generally, gradually and continuously changing from essentially the alkane mobile phase solvent to the final mobile phase solvent can occur during a period of about 5 minutes to about 120 minutes at a flow rate of about 1 mL/min. to about 4 mL/min. In one embodiment, gradually and continuously changing from the alkane mobile phase solvent to the final mobile phase solvent can occur during a period of about 15 minutes to about 30 minutes at a flow rate of about 1 mL/min. to about 4 mL/min. 
     The first amount of the precipitated asphaltenes are dissolved by gradually and continuously changing the alkane mobile phase solvent to a first final mobile phase solvent having a solubility parameter at least 1 MPa 0.5  higher than the alkane mobile phase solvent. As one skilled in the art will readily appreciate, the selection of the first final mobile phase solvent will depend on such factors as moving from a low solubility parameter solvent (low solvent power) to a high solubility parameter solvent (high solvent power) using solvents that have the right combination of dispersion, polar and hydrogen bonding forces. For example, a first final mobile phase solvent such as a chlorinated hydrocarbon solvent, e.g., dichloromethane, an ether solvent, an aromatic hydrocarbon solvent or mixtures thereof is gradually and continuously added to the column to sequentially change the alkane mobile phase solvent from 100% alkane mobile phase solvent to 100% first final mobile phase solvent, i.e., the alkane mobile phase solvent is changed to 1% dichloromethane in 99% alkane mobile phase solvent, then to 2% dichloromethane in 98% alkane mobile phase solvent, until the mobile phase solvent in the column is 100% dichloromethane and 0% alkane mobile phase solvent. In this manner, a first amount of the precipitated asphaltenes (i.e., easy to dissolve asphaltenes) will be gradually dissolved and a characteristic elution pattern generated, which is referred to as the asphaltene solubility profile, as discussed hereinbelow. 
     After the first amount of precipitated asphaltenes has been gradually dissolved, a second or remaining amount of the precipitated asphaltenes (which are not capable of being redissolved in the one or more first final mobile phase solvents) is left in the column. Thus, in order to redissolve the second amount of precipitated asphaltenes, also referred to as hard to dissolve asphaltenes (i.e., higher solubility parameter asphaltenes), it is may be necessary to add one or more second final mobile phase solvents having a solubility parameter at least 1 MPa 0.5  higher than the first final mobile phase solvent to the column in order to substantially dissolve the remaining amount of the precipitated asphaltenes in the column and generate a characteristic elution pattern of the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock. This can advantageously allow for a more accurate determination of the solubility profile of the various asphaltene components in the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock. 
     The selection of the second final mobile phase solvent will depend on such factors as moving from a lower solubility parameter solvent (the first final mobile phase solvent) to a higher solubility parameter solvent (the second final mobile phase solvent) using solvents that have the right combination of dispersion, polar and hydrogen bonding forces. A suitable one or more second final mobile phase solvent can readily be determined by one skilled in the art, e.g., a C 1  to C 6  alcohol such as methanol. Accordingly, in one embodiment, methanol is gradually and continuously added to the column to sequentially change the first final mobile phase solvent, e.g., dichloromethane, from 100% dichloromethane to 100% methanol, i.e., dichloromethane is first changed to 1% methanol in 99% dichloromethane, then to 2% methanol in 98% dichloromethane, until the second final mobile phase solvent in the column is 100% methanol and 0% dichloromethane. 
     The flow rate and time period for gradually and continuously adding the one or more second final mobile phase solvents are substantially the same as for the first final mobile phase solvents. 
     The asphaltene concentration in the eluted fractions from the column is continuously monitored using, for example, a liquid chromatography detector as discussed hereinabove. In one preferred embodiment, an evaporative light scattering detector is used as a liquid chromatography detector to monitor each eluting sample&#39;s concentration. The operating principle of an evaporative light scattering detector is as follows: the compounds to be analyzed are transported by a mobile phase or a more volatile carrier liquid which is then nebulized and evaporated at a relatively low temperature (being able to be in the order of from about 30 to about 150° C.) so that residual micro-particles alone remain—ideally the compounds to be analyzed—which can be detected by light scattering. In this manner, it is possible to analyze directly effluents which originate from the column under the condition of selecting a mobile phase which is volatile enough to be directly used as a carrier liquid for the evaporative light scattering detector. For example, in the case of the asphaltenes, the result is a curve that represents the solubility parameter distribution of the asphaltenes. 
     Next, a solubility profile of the asphaltenes in the liquid sample can be created by techniques known in the art. For example, when asphaltenes are quantified using an evaporative light scattering detector, the result is a curve that represents the solubility parameter distribution of the asphaltene in the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock. Since the solubility parameter of a mixture of solvents is given by the volumetric average of the components, it is possible to convert the time scale of the elution to a solubility parameter scale using the following equation: 
     
       
         
           
             δ 
             = 
             
               
                 ∑ 
                 
                   i 
                   = 
                   1 
                 
                 n 
               
                
               
                 
                   φ 
                   i 
                 
                  
                 
                   δ 
                   i 
                 
               
             
           
         
       
     
     wherein δ is the solubility profile of the mixture, ϕ i  is the volume fraction and δ i  is the solubility parameter of each of the components, respectively. The volume fraction is the volume fraction of the blend of each solvent and readily determined by the chromatography apparatus. The solubility parameter of a component is either known in the art, e.g., Barton, A. F. M.  Handbook of Solubility Parameters and Other Cohesion Parameters ; CRC Press Inc.: Boca Raton, Fla., 1983, or can be determined by techniques within the purview of one skilled in the art. 
     Determining Asphaltene Content 
     Once the one or more solubility characteristics have been analyzed for a given hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample, the asphaltene content can be determined as follows. 
     Solubility Fraction Method 
     In the solubility fraction method, the result is one peak for each eluted solvent fraction with each peak representing a solubility characteristic of the asphaltenes. The area under the separate peaks can be determined using commercially available software packages for qualitative and quantitative analysis that include quantification of peak area and height. Commercially available software packages include, by way of example, GRAMS/AI package provided by Thermo Galactic (Salem, N.H.) and Chemstation® by Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, Calif.). Then, each area is correlated to an asphaltene mass according to a calibration curve that depends on the type of detector used as within the purview of one skilled in the art. The calibration may or may not be the same for all the peaks. The total asphaltene mass (TAM) for the sample would therefore be the addition of all the asphaltene masses (M) determined for each peak: 
     
       
         
           
             TAM 
             = 
             
               
                 ∑ 
                 
                   i 
                   = 
                   1 
                 
                 n 
               
                
               
                 M 
                 i 
               
             
           
         
       
     
     Solubility Profile Method 
     In the solubility profile method, the amount of asphaltenes is determined by calculating the area of the second peak of the solubility profile. An asphaltene solubility profile normally shows either two peaks or one peak and one shoulder from the evaporative light scattering detector. The two peaks or peak/shoulder can be separated by numerical methods well known in the art such as, for example, peak deconvolution or peak fitting. The area under the peaks, e.g., the second peak, can be determined using commercially available software packages for qualitative and quantitative analysis that include quantification of peak area and height. Commercially available software packages include, by way of example, GRAMS/AI package provided by Thermo Galactic (Salem, N.H.) and Chemstation® by Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, Calif.). Then, this area is correlated to an asphaltene mass according to a calibration curve. A calibration procedure was developed that relates the measured peak area (A) to the total asphaltene mass in the sample (TAM). The following equation is an example of such correlation that allows the calculation of the asphaltene mass: 
       Log TAM=0.5336 log  A −6.097
 
     where TAM is the total mass in the sample and A is the area of the second deconvoluted peak respectively. 
     Determining Asphaltene Stability 
     In one embodiment, an asphaltene stability parameter can be determined from the solubility characteristics of the asphaltenes in the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample from the solubility fraction method discussed above. The asphaltene fraction method normally shows a single peak for each eluted solvent fraction from the evaporative light scattering detector which represents the solubility characteristics of the asphaltenes. In one embodiment, the asphaltene stability can be determined from a ratio of the area under the single peaks for each eluted solvent fraction, i.e., once the peaks are known, the areas for each of the peaks are calculated and a ratio between the areas determined. The area under the peaks can be calculated using commercially available software packages for qualitative and quantitative analysis that include quantification of peak area and height. Commercially available software packages include, by way of example, GRAMS/AI package provided by Thermo Galactic (Salem, N.H.) and Chemstation® by Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, Calif.). Accordingly, one such way to calculate the ratio is as follows: 
       Ratio=(area peak 3+area peak 4)/(area peak 1+area peak 2) 
     wherein peak 1 is the first peak characterizing the first asphaltene fraction eluted from the column (i.e., easy to dissolve asphaltenes); peak 2 is the second peak characterizing the second asphaltene fraction eluted from the column; peak 3 is the third peak characterizing the third asphaltene fraction eluted from the column and peak 4 is the fourth peak characterizing the fourth asphaltene fraction eluted from the column. In this ratio, the first two peaks (peak 1 and 2) represent “easy to dissolve asphaltenes” that help in the solubilization of the rest of asphaltenes (last two peaks: 3 and 4) also known as “difficult to dissolve asphaltenes”. The larger the ratio, the lower the stability since there are less easy to dissolve asphaltenes that help in the solubilization of the difficult to dissolve asphaltenes. 
     In another embodiment, asphaltene stability can be determined from the solubility profile of the asphaltenes in the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample created by the solubility profile method discussed above. For example, one or more parameters can be mathematically calculated based on the solubility profile of the asphaltenes. An asphaltene solubility profile normally shows either two peaks or one peak and one shoulder from the evaporative light scattering detector. The two peaks or peak/shoulder can be separated by numerical methods well known in the art such as, for example, peak deconvolution or peak fitting. The first resolved peak is generally known as an “easy to dissolve asphaltene” peak and is derived from step (i) which gradually and continuously changes the one or more first solvents to a first final mobile phase solvent having a solubility parameter at least about 1 MPa 0.5  higher than the one or more first solvents to dissolve a first amount of the precipitated asphaltenes. The second resolved peak or shoulder is generally known as a “hard to dissolve asphaltene” peak and is derived from step (ii) which gradually and continuously changes the first final mobile phase solvent to a second final mobile phase solvent having a solubility parameter at least about 1 MPa 0.5  higher than the first final mobile phase solvent to dissolve a second, or remaining amount of precipitated asphaltenes. 
     Examples of parameters related to asphaltene stability that can be calculated include the following. 
     1. Average solubility parameter of the hard to dissolve asphaltenes (SPA). This is a measurement of how difficult it is to dissolve the material eluted in the second peak or shoulder of the solubility profile (i.e., the hard to dissolve asphaltenes). It is calculated as the mean of the distribution corresponding to the second peak or shoulder obtained by the solubility parameter scale calculation discussed above. The higher the value, the more difficult it is to dissolve the hard to dissolve asphaltenes thereby indicating lower stability. 
     2. Ratio of hard-to-dissolve asphaltenes/easy to dissolve asphaltenes (i.e., second peak area/first peak area ratio wherein the second peak area and first peak area are derived from the solubility profile). After the separation of the peaks discussed hereinabove with respect to the asphaltene solubility profile, the areas for both peaks are calculated and the ratio between both areas determined. The area under the peaks can be determined using commercially available software packages for qualitative and quantitative analysis that include quantification of peak area and height. Commercially available software packages include, by way of example, GRAMS/AI package provided by Thermo Galactic (Salem, N.H.) and Chemstation® by Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, Calif.). This ratio indicates whether there is enough transitional material or easy to dissolve asphaltenes (first peak) to keep the hard to dissolve (i.e., highly insoluble) asphaltenes (second peak) in solution. Accordingly, a larger ratio indicates a lower amount of transitional material or easy to dissolve asphaltenes present in the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks in comparison with the more polar asphaltenes and hence a higher tendency of the latter to precipitate. 
     3. Overlapping of hard-to-dissolve asphaltenes to the easy to dissolve asphaltenes. This is a measurement of the compatibility between both species and, therefore, can be used to evaluate stability. After the separation of the peaks discussed hereinabove with respect to the asphaltene solubility profile, the area of both peaks are calculated as well as the overlapping area which corresponds with the area that both peaks share and lie in the same region. Accordingly, a higher value indicates greater stability and, therefore, the asphaltenes are less prone to precipitate. 
     4. ΔPS measures the broadness of the solubility profile and it is also related to the stability of the asphaltenes in the hydrocarbon-containing feedstock. This parameter is calculated according to the following equation: 
       Δ PS=t (75%)− t (25%)
 
     wherein t(75%) and t(25%) represent the time at which 75% and 25% of the asphaltenes in the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock (in terms of area) have eluted, respectively. The ΔPS is calculated based on the cumulative areas of the whole distribution of times or solubility parameters that represent the solubility profile of the asphaltenes in the sample. Accordingly, a higher value indicates that a higher solubility parameter solvent is required to redissolved them and hence they present a lower stability and are more prone to precipitate. 
     In another embodiment, asphaltene stability can be determined from the solubility characteristics of the asphaltenes in the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample according to ASTM D6703 or similar titration techniques well known by those skilled in the art, e.g., ASTM D7060, ASTM D4740, ASTM D7061, ASTM D7112 and ASTM D7157. These techniques provide the overall compatibility of the system. For example, ASTM D 6703 shows how to calculate P-value, which represent the stability. The larger this value, the more stable is the sample. 
     Estimating Sediment Content 
     Once the asphaltene content and one of the parameters related to asphaltene stability have been determined for a given hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample, the sediment content of the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample can be estimated by correlating the asphaltene content and one of the asphaltene stability parameters of the liquid sample. In one embodiment, the sediment content of the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock can be estimated according to the following formulae I and II: 
       Sediment Content= K (asphaltene content) a (asphaltene stability) b   (I)
 
       Sediment Content= K+a *asphaltene content+ b *asphaltene stability  (II)
 
     wherein K, a and b are constants determined using regression analysis tools widely available in different commercially available software packages such as SigmaPlot and Excel. 
     If desired, the selection of the one or more hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks can further employ one or more additional steps as discussed above, such as step (vii) selecting one or more second hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock samples; repeating steps (i)-(vi); and comparing the results of the one or more second hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock samples with the results of the first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample to predict one or more leading candidate hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks. 
     In one embodiment, after correlating the asphaltene content of the liquid sample with the one or more asphaltene stability parameters to estimate the sediment content of the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock, one or more additional hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock samples can be selected and subjected to substantially the same steps as the first sample. The results for these additional one or more hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock samples can be compared with the results derived from the first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock sample to select which of the samples are a leading candidate. For example, after using the asphaltene content and one of the many asphaltene stability parameters of the liquid sample to estimate the sediment content of the sample, a sample of a different hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock can be characterized in accordance with substantially the same steps as the first sample and then these results can be compared against the first hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock to select which of the samples are a leading candidate. The selection process can use as many different samples as the user desires. 
     In one embodiment, after using the asphaltene content of the liquid sample and one of the many asphaltene stability parameters to estimate the sediment content of the liquid sample, a different sample of the same hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock can be characterized in accordance with substantially the same steps as the first sample and then these results can be compared against the original hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock for the purpose of, for example, quality control. In one embodiment, a different sample can be from the same batch of the hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock or can be from a different hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock. The various ways to compare the two hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks include comparing their API gravity, sulfur content, vanadium and nickel contents, distillable material contents, viscosity, asphaltene content, “easy-to-react” to “hard-to-process” asphaltenes, H/C ratio, molecular weight, SARA (Saturates, Aromatics, Resins, and Asphaltenes), Total Acid Number etc. 
     In one embodiment, once one or more of the leading hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock have been selected, one or more of the selected hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstock can then be used as a component for blending with one or more other selected hydroprocessed hydrocarbon-containing feedstocks. 
     The information obtained from the methods of the present invention can then be stored in a relational database. For example, a relational database can be electrically connected to a signal data collector comprising a computer microprocessor for system operation and control to collect the data from the various tests over an extended period of time to compile a library therefrom. The database can be used to find optimum combinations for a desired product stream, and can be particularly useful when the desired product stream varies depending on market factors. When the product requirements change, appropriate combinations can be selected to prepare the desired product. 
     The following non-limiting examples are illustrative of the present invention. 
     Example 1 
     Fifteen hydroprocessed feedstocks were obtained from two different pilot plants. Solutions of each of these hydroprocessed feedstocks were prepared by dissolving 0.1000 g of the material in 10 mL of methylene chloride. Then, the solutions were injected into a stainless steel column packed with poly(tetrafluoroethylene) using a heptane mobile phase at a flow rate of 4 mL/min. The maltenes (heptane solubles) eluted from the column as the first peak around 2 minutes after the injection. After 10 minutes, the solvent was changed from heptane to the methylene chloride/methanol blend gradually to redissolve a portion of the asphaltenes which started to elute around 12 minutes. After a 90/10 methylene chloride/methanol mobile phase was reached, the blends were gradually switched to methanol. After 20 minutes, a final mobile phase of 100% methanol was passed into the column. All the solvents and blends were injected into the column at a flow rate of 4 mL/min. After reaching 100% methanol, the solvent phase was switched again to n-heptane for 5 minutes. 
     The concentration of maltenes and asphaltenes were quantified using an Evaporative Light Scattering Detector (Alltech ELSD 2000), which was equipped with a light-scattering photometer by evaporating the solvent and passing the stream containing non-volatile particles (asphaltenes or maltenes) through the light-scattering photometer. The light scattered by the non-volatile particles was collected and is a measure of the concentration of the solute in the column effluent. An asphaltene solubility profile normally shows either two peaks or one peak and one shoulder from the evaporative light scattering detector. The two peaks or peak/shoulder can be separated by numerical methods well known in the art such as, for example, peak deconvolution or peak fitting using commercial software such as Grams/AI by Thermo Galactic (Salem, N.H.). The area under the obtained second peak was calculated using Excel Software by Microsoft Co. by applying the trapezoidal rule. Then, this area was correlated to an asphaltene mass according to a calibration curve. A calibration procedure was developed that relates the measured peak area (A) to the total asphaltene mass in the sample (TAM). The following equation is an example of such correlation that allows the calculation of the asphaltene mass: 
       Log TAM= C  log  A+B    
     where TAM and A are the total asphaltenee mass in the sample and the area of the second peak, respectively. C and B are constants determined by regression analysis performed using Excel Software by Microsoft Co. 
     The resulting asphaltene solubility profiles were also mathematically processed to obtain ΔPS which is an asphaltene stability parameter. The ΔPS was calculated based on the cumulative areas of the whole distribution that represented the solubility profile of the asphaltenes in the sample. The cumulative areas were calculated using Excel by Microsoft Co. by applying the trapezoidal rule. Then, the ΔPS was determined by subtracting the time that corresponds to 25% of the area from the time that corresponds to 75% of the area. 
     At the same time, sediment content for the samples was determined using ASTM 4870. 
     A summary of all the data collected for the studied samples in this example is shown in Table 1. 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                 TABLE 1 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 Sediment 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Asphaltene 
                 Asphaltene 
                 Content 
               
               
                   
                 Sample 
                 Content (wt %) 
                 Stability (□PS) 
                 (ppm) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 1 
                 0.96 
                 2.78 
                 4716 
               
               
                   
                 2 
                 0.96 
                 2.93 
                 4590 
               
               
                   
                 3 
                 0.93 
                 2.89 
                 4334 
               
               
                   
                 4 
                 0.98 
                 2.88 
                 3838 
               
               
                   
                 5 
                 0.93 
                 2.83 
                 3112 
               
               
                   
                 6 
                 0.98 
                 2.86 
                 3604 
               
               
                   
                 7 
                 0.90 
                 2.85 
                 3167 
               
               
                   
                 8 
                 0.32 
                 3.43 
                 1983 
               
               
                   
                 9 
                 0.25 
                 4.03 
                 2407 
               
               
                   
                 10 
                 0.30 
                 4.22 
                 3264 
               
               
                   
                 11 
                 0.38 
                 3.86 
                 899 
               
               
                   
                 12 
                 0.43 
                 4.94 
                 4969 
               
               
                   
                 13 
                 0.21 
                 3.86 
                 1466 
               
               
                   
                 14 
                 0.23 
                 3.58 
                 1307 
               
               
                   
                 15 
                 0.54 
                 3.01 
                 100 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     It was found that the sediment content was related to the asphaltene content and the asphaltene stability of the sample by the following equation (1): 
         S=− 8513.9+2220.106×Δ PS+ 6298.67×Δ sp   (1)
 
     where S represents sediment content, ΔPS is a measurement of asphaltene stability of the sample and Asp is the asphaltene content (wt. %) of the sample. The constants in the equation were obtained using a regression analysis methodology available using Excel Software by Microsoft Co. 
       FIG. 1  shows a comparison between the sediment content calculated using equation (1) and the sediment content determined by ASTM 4870 for each of the samples. As can be seen in  FIG. 4 , the correlation coefficient was R 2 =0.7537, thereby indicating that it is possible to estimate sediment content in hydroprocessed feedstocks by determining the asphaltene content and the asphaltene stability measured using the solubility profile method. 
     Example 2 
     Twenty three hydroprocessed feedstocks were obtained from two different pilot plants and one commercial operation. Solutions of these materials were prepared by dissolving 0.1000 g of the material in 10 mL of methylene chloride. Then, the solutions were injected into a separate stainless steel column packed with poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (PTFE) using n-heptane as a mobile phase. The flow rate during the process was 4 mL/min. The maltenes (heptane solubles) eluted from the column as the first peak around 2 minutes after the injection. The asphaltenes remained precipitated in the column and were fractionated according to their respective solubilities by switching the mobile phase in successive steps to solvents of increasing solubility parameters: (1) 10 minutes after the injection of the sample, the mobile phase was switched to a blend of 15% methylene chloride/85% n-heptane (Solubility Parameter of 16.05 MPa 0.5 ) (2) 20 minutes after the injection of the sample, the mobile phase was switched to a blend of 30% methylene chloride/70% n-heptane (Solubility Parameter of 18.8 MPa 0.5 ) (3) 30 minutes after the mobile phase was switched to 100% methylene chloride (Solubility Parameter of 20.3 MPa 0.5 ); and (4) 40 minutes after the injection of the sample, the mobile phase was switched to a blend of 10% methanol/90% methylene chloride (Solubility Parameter of 21.23 MPa 0.5 ). After 10 additional minutes, the solvent was switched again to n-heptane to prepare the column for the next sample. 
     Four asphaltene fractions were obtained: (1) asphaltenes soluble in 85/15 heptane/methylene chloride (peak 1), (2) 70/30 heptane/methylene chloride (peak 2), (3) 100% methylene chloride (peak 3) and (4) 90/10 methylene chloride/methanol (peak 4). The eluted fractions were quantified using an Evaporative Light Scanning Detector (ELSD) as described in Example 1. The light scattered by the non-volatile particles was collected and is a measure of the concentration of the solute in the column effluent. As a result, one peak for each eluted solvent fraction was obtained. The area under each peak was calculated using the commercial software Chemstation® by Agilent Technologies (Santa Clara, Calif.). These areas represent the solubility characteristics of the asphaltenes present in the sample and the asphaltene stability of the samples were determined according to the following equation: 
         R =(Area peak 3+Area peak 4)/(Area peak 1+Area peak 2) 
     The areas were also used to determine the asphaltene content as follows: each area was correlated to an asphaltene mass according to a calibration curve that for the ELSD is as follows 
       Log  M   i   =C  log  A   i   +B    
     where M i  and A i  are the mass and the area corresponding to the peak i with I varying from 1 to 4, and C and B are constants determined using the regression analysis tool available in Excel Software by Microsoft Co. 
     Next, the total asphaltene mass (TAM) for the sample would be the addition of all the asphaltene masses (M i ) determined for each peak: 
     
       
         
           
             TAM 
             = 
             
               
                 ∑ 
                 
                   i 
                   = 
                   1 
                 
                 4 
               
                
               
                 M 
                 i 
               
             
           
         
       
     
     At the same time, the sediment content for the samples was determined using ASTM 4870. The asphaltene content, asphaltene stability and sediment content for each of the samples are set forth below in Table 2: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                 TABLE 2 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 Asphaltene 
                 Asphaltene 
                 Sediment 
               
               
                   
                 Sample 
                 Content (wt %) 
                 Stability 
                 Content (ppm) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 1 
                 1.12 
                 1.82 
                 1983 
               
               
                   
                 2 
                 0.79 
                 3.09 
                 2407 
               
               
                   
                 3 
                 0.96 
                 2.45 
                 3264 
               
               
                   
                 4 
                 1.00 
                 4.53 
                 4969 
               
               
                   
                 5 
                 0.53 
                 1.89 
                 1466 
               
               
                   
                 6 
                 0.78 
                 1.73 
                 1307 
               
               
                   
                 7 
                 1.31 
                 1.01 
                 0 
               
               
                   
                 8 
                 0.74 
                 3.62 
                 4812 
               
               
                   
                 9 
                 1.14 
                 1.83 
                 2369 
               
               
                   
                 10 
                 0.56 
                 1.45 
                 1520 
               
               
                   
                 11 
                 0.68 
                 2.04 
                 3013 
               
               
                   
                 12 
                 1.18 
                 1.48 
                 1640 
               
               
                   
                 13 
                 1.11 
                 1.25 
                 813 
               
               
                   
                 14 
                 1.12 
                 1.24 
                 1998 
               
               
                   
                 15 
                 1.08 
                 0.92 
                 223 
               
               
                   
                 16 
                 0.69 
                 2.08 
                 2001 
               
               
                   
                 17 
                 3.45 
                 4.25 
                 3519 
               
               
                   
                 18 
                 3.41 
                 3.30 
                 3458 
               
               
                   
                 19 
                 3.73 
                 3.36 
                 4716 
               
               
                   
                 20 
                 3.75 
                 3.41 
                 4832 
               
               
                   
                 21 
                 3.77 
                 3.37 
                 3794 
               
               
                   
                 22 
                 3.89 
                 3.42 
                 4040 
               
               
                   
                 23 
                 3.50 
                 3.03 
                 4816 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     It was found that the sediment content was related to the asphaltene stability and the asphaltene content of the sample by the following equation (2): 
         S=− 398.229+1172.387× R+ 143.7398× A   (2)
 
     where S represents sediment content, R is a measurement of asphaltene stability of the sample and A is the asphaltene content (wt. %) of the sample. The constants in the equation were obtained using a regression analysis methodology available using Excel Software by Microsoft Co. 
       FIG. 2  shows a comparison between the sediment content calculated using equation (2) and the experimental sediment content determined by ASTM 4870. As can be seen, the correlation coefficient was R 2 =0.7949, thereby indicating that it is possible to estimate sediment content in hydroprocessed feedstocks by determining the asphaltene content and the asphaltene stability measured using the solubility fraction method. 
     It will be understood that various modifications may be made to the embodiments disclosed herein. Therefore the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as exemplifications of preferred embodiments. For example, the functions described above and implemented as the best mode for operating the present invention are for illustration purposes only. Other arrangements and methods may be implemented by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of this invention. Moreover, those skilled in the art will envision other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.