Patent Publication Number: US-2022232867-A1

Title: Confectionery composition

Description:
The invention relates to a confectionery product and to a process for making a confectionery product. 
     Chocolate is a high sugar and calorie food, and is associated with indulgent treats and snacks. Current food trends are emphasizing healthier snacking options, and there is a growing trend for snack products which are lower in sugar, fat and/or calories, as well as providing additional nutrients. Healthier snacks such as nuts and fruit provide far better nutritional options for consumers, but are rarely seen as indulgent by consumers and are often less enjoyable. As such, it is difficult to motivate consumers to choose products which are better for their health, rather than selecting indulgent but unhealthy products. 
     As such, there is significant demand for a product which satisfies both criteria. However, a significant problem is that consumer expectation and experience puts both of these characteristics in conflict. 
     An object of the present invention is to provide a product which is both seen as indulgent by a consumer, but which also provides improved nutritional properties. 
     SUMMARY OF INVENTION 
     According to a first aspect of the invention, there is provided a confectionery product comprising:
         a first portion comprising a fruit and/or nut composition and a binder;   a second portion comprising a confectionery composition;   and a third portion comprising a chocolate composition.       

     The confectionery composition may comprise one or more of: icing, fondant, ganache, dairy or non-dairy cream product, mousse, emulsion, foam, caramel, fudge, and toffee. The confectionery composition may comprise chocolate and/or be chocolate-flavoured. In some embodiments, the confectionery composition is a chocolate-flavoured icing, fondant, dairy or non-dairy cream product, mousse, emulsion or foam. 
     In some embodiments, the confectionery composition is a ganache. The ganache may be a chocolate-flavoured ganache, optionally a dark chocolate-flavoured ganache. The confectionery composition of the second portion may enhance the consumer perception of indulgence of the confectionery product. 
     The ganache may advantageously function to deliver high cacao intensity which can reinforce the overall chocolate taste of the product. Thus, the use of ganache as the second portion helps to provide a product which is perceived as being indulgent by a consumer. As the skilled person will appreciate, ganache is typically a soft substance having strong chocolate/cacao notes which may be used as a glaze, icing or filling. Traditionally ganache is prepared by mixing chocolate and cream, but it may also be made using syrup instead of cream. Methods of preparing ganache will be known to those skilled in the art. 
     For the purposes of this disclosure, the term % is used to mean percentage by weight. 
     The confectionery product may comprise from 45 to 85% of the first portion. Optionally, the confectionery product comprises 50 to 80% of the first portion, 55 to 75% of the first portion, 60 to 70% of the first portion, or 62 to 68% of the first portion, 64 to 66% of the first portion or 65% of the first portion. 
     The confectionery product may comprise 1 to 35% of the second portion. Optionally, the confectionery product may comprise 1 to 30% of the second portion, 5 to 25% of the second portion, 10 to 20% of the second portion, 12 to 18% of the second portion, 14 to 16% of the second portion or 15% of the second portion. 
     The confectionery product may comprise 1 to 40% of the third portion. Optionally, the confectionery product may comprise 5 to 35% of the third portion, 10 to 30% of the third portion, 15 to 25% of the second portion, 17 to 23% of the second portion, 19 to 21% of the second portion or 20% of the second portion. 
     The first portion may comprise 50 to 100% of a fruit and/or nut composition. Optionally, the first portion may comprise 60 to 90%, 70 to 80%, 75 to 80%, 77 to 79% or 78% of the fruit and/or nut composition. Fruit and/or nut compositions enhance the consumer perception of healthiness of the confectionery product. 
     The fruit and/or nut composition may comprise one or more of: whole and/or partial nuts, nut pastes, whole and/or partial fruits, whole and/or partial dried fruits, and fruit pastes. The fruit and/or nut composition may further comprise one or more of: seeds, legumes, baked and/or unbaked cereals and grains, herbs and spices. For the purposes of this disclosure, peanuts and coconut are considered a nut. 
     Examples of suitable nuts include: almonds, peanuts, macadamia nuts, hazelnuts, coconut, pecans, walnuts, pistachios, cashews, and brazil nuts. In some embodiments the nuts are roasted. The fruit and/or nut composition may comprise a single type of nut, or a mixture of two, three or more types of nuts. For example, the fruit and/or nut composition may comprise almonds, hazelnuts, peanuts, or any combination thereof. 
     Examples of suitable legumes include: chickpeas, peas (e.g. pea crisps), lentils, carob, soybeans and tamarind. 
     Examples of suitable seeds include: sunflower seeds, poppy seeds, pumpkin seeds, chia seeds, coffee beans and cocoa beans. 
     Examples of suitable cereals and grains include: oats, barley, corn, wheat, buckwheat, quinoa and puffed rice. 
     Examples of suitable fruits and dried fruits includes: raisins, sultanas, currants, prunes, dates, grapes, berries including strawberries, cranberries, raspberries, and blueberries, stone fruits including peach, nectarine, plum, lychee, mango, apricot and cherries, apple, pear, banana or any other suitable fruit. The fruits may be whole or in pieces. The fruits may be fresh, dried and/or in paste form. For example, some fruits/fruit pieces may be dried while others may be fresh or in the form of a paste. 
     In some embodiments, the fruit and/or nut composition comprises almonds and peanuts. In a further embodiment, the fruit and/or nut composition comprises almonds, peanuts and a dried fruit, such as dried cranberries. 
     The fruit and/or nut composition may further comprise one or more additional ingredients, such as protein-based products (e.g. whey crisps), cereal crisps, one or more vegetables, and any combination thereof. 
     The fruit and/or nut composition may comprise up to 50%, up to 60%, up to 70, up to 80%, up to 90%, or up to 90% or up to 95% nuts and/or fruit. The remainder of the composition may be binder and, optionally, other ingredients such as cereals, seeds, legumes and/or grains. 
     The fruit and/or nut composition may comprise 1% to 90% whole nuts and/or fruits. Optionally, the fruit and/or nut composition may comprise 5% to 60%, 10% to 50%, 15% to 35% or 20% to 30% whole nuts or fruits. The inventors have found that having whole nuts or fruits, and especially when visible, improves the perception of healthiness of the confectionery product. 
     In some embodiments, the fruit and/or nut composition comprises 10 to 30% whole nuts. 
     The fruit and/or nut composition may comprise 60 to 90% partial nuts (e.g. chopped nuts). 
     In some embodiments, the fruit and/or nut composition comprises a mixture of whole nuts and partial nuts. 
     The fruit and/or nut composition may comprise 0 to 10% cereals and grains (e.g. 2 to 8% or 3 to 5%). 
     In some embodiments, the fruit and/or nut composition comprises almonds and peanuts. The fruit and/or nut composition may comprise 16 to 26% roasted whole almonds, 30 to 40% roasted chopped almonds, 33 to 43% roasted peanuts, and 1 to 11% whey crisps. For example, the fruit and/or nut composition may comprise 21% roasted whole almonds, 35% roasted chopped almonds, 38% roasted peanuts, and 6% whey crisps. 
     In some embodiments, the fruit and/or nut composition comprises 10 to 30% whole nuts, 40 to 80% partial nuts (e.g. chopped nuts), 1 to 20% fruits and dried fruits (e.g. whole, partial and/or pastes), and 0 to 10% cereals and grains. 
     In some embodiments, the fruit and/or nut composition comprises 16 to 26% roasted whole almonds, 38 to 48% roasted chopped almonds, 15 to 25% roasted peanuts, 5 to 15% dried cranberries and 1 to 11% whey crisps. For example, the fruit and/or nut composition may comprise 21% roasted whole almonds, 43% roasted chopped almonds, 20% roasted peanuts, 10% dried cranberries and 6% whey crisps. 
     The confectionery product may comprise at least 20 to 90% of the fruit and/or nut composition. The confectionery product may comprise 30 to 80%, at least 40 to 70% or 50 to 60% of the fruit and/or nut composition. 
     It will be appreciated that the amount of binder must be sufficient to hold the ingredients of the first portion together, and can be adjusted by the skilled person as needed. The first portion may comprise 5 to 50% of the binder. Optionally, the first portion may comprise 10 to 40%, 20 to 30%, 20 to 25%, 21 to 23% or 22% of the binder. The binder may comprise a syrup (such as sugar syrup), toffee or caramel. The binder may comprise one or more of: sugars, honey, sugar alcohols, intense sweeteners, and combinations thereof. 
     Suitable binders will be known to those skilled in the art. A typical binder may comprise about 70% syrup (e.g. glucose syrup), about 24% honey, about 5% sugar and about 1% emulsifier. 
     Examples of suitable sugars include glucose, dextrose, glucose syrup solids, fructose, lactose, maltose, invert sugar syrup and any combination thereof. The sugar alcohols for example may include erythritol, maltitol, isomalt, mannitol, xylitol, sorbitol and other polyols. Intense sweeteners may include aspartame, acesulfame-k, cyclamates, saccharin, sucralose, neohesperidin, dihydrochalone, alitame, stena sweeteners, glycyrrhizin or combinations thereof. 
     In some embodiments, the binder comprises oligofructose, honey, glucose syrup and invert sugar syrup. 
     The binder may further comprise one or more of: flavourings, flavour enhancers, salt, preservatives, stabilisers, and emulsifiers. 
     Examples of suitable flavourings include: cocoa powder; cocoa liquor, vanilla extract, mint flavouring, fruit flavouring (e.g. orange flavouring), and chocolate. 
     Examples of suitable emulsifiers include: lecithin (e.g. soy lecithin). 
     The confectionery product may comprise at least 5 wt % of the binder. The confectionery product may comprise at least 10 wt %, 12 wt % or at least 14 wt % of the binder. 
     The confectionery composition of the second portion may comprise one or more of: white, milk or dark chocolate, cocoa powder or cocoa liquor. The confectionery composition of the second portion may comprise a chocolate flavoured ganache, and optionally, a dark chocolate flavoured ganache. The confectionery composition of the second portion may comprise dark chocolate mass and cocoa liquor. The confectionery composition of the second portion can enhance the consumer perception of indulgence of the confectionery product. Further beneficially, strong or richly flavoured confectionery compositions can strongly enhance the perception of indulgence. Furthermore, this can be achieved with fewer calories or reduced sugar compared with the required amount of chocolate composition to achieve the same level of indulgence. 
     The confectionery composition of the second portion may comprise a sweetener. The sweetener may comprise one or more of: sugars, sugar alcohols, intense sweeteners, and combinations thereof. For example, the sugars may comprise glucose, dextrose, glucose syrup solids, fructose, lactose, maltose, invert sugar syrup and any combination thereof. The sugar alcohols for example may include erythritol, maltitol, isomalt, mannitol, xylitol, sorbitol and other polyols. Intense sweeteners may include aspartame, acesulfame-k, cyclamates, saccharin, sucralose, neohesperidin, dihydrochalone, alitame, stena sweeteners, glycyrrhizin or combinations thereof. 
     In some embodiments, the sweetener may comprise glucose syrup and invert sugar syrup. 
     The confectionery composition of the second portion may comprise a lipid. Suitable lipids include cocoa butter, cocoa butter substitute or cocoa butter equivalent, or a milk fat. 
     The confectionery composition of the second portion may comprise an additional ingredient such as an emulsifier and/or a stabiliser. The emulsifier may comprise lecithin, such as soy lecithin. 
     The chocolate composition may comprise one or more of white, milk or dark chocolate, couverture or compound chocolate. In some embodiments the chocolate composition is a milk chocolate. Chocolate compositions enhance the perception of indulgence of the confectionery product. 
     In some embodiments, the chocolate composition comprises a Cocoa Butter Equivalent (CBE). CBEs are defined in Directive 2000/36/EC. Suitable CBEs include illipe, Borneo tallow, tengkawang, palm oil, sal, shea, kokum gurgi and mango kernel. 
     In some embodiments, the composition comprises a Cocoa Butter Substitute (CBS). Suitable CBSs include CBS laurics and CBS non-laurics. CBS laurics are short-chain fatty acid glycerides. Their physical properties vary within the group but they all have triglyceride configurations that make them compatible with cocoa butter. Suitable CBS laurics include those based on palm kernel oil and coconut oil. CBS non-laurics consist of fractions obtained from hydrogenated oils. The oils are selectively hydrogenated with the formation of trans acids, which increases the solid phase of the fat. Suitable sources for CBS non-laurics include soya, cottonseed, peanut, rapeseed and corn (maize) oil. 
     In some embodiments, each of the first and second portions forms a discrete region or a layer of the confectionery product. Preferably the portions are approximately planar. In some embodiments, the third portion forms a discrete region or a layer of the confectionery product. 
     Optionally, the third portion forms a full or partial coating of the first and/or second portions. The coating may be formed by enrobing. In embodiments with a partial coating, the coating may cover the second portion. In some embodiments, the third portion forms a half-shoulder enrobing of the product. For example, in an embodiment wherein the first and second portions form layers, the third portion may form a base of the confectionery product and may extend at least partially up the sides of the first and/or second portions. Embodiments wherein the third portion forms a base are desirable, since the chocolate composition of the third portion may provide a consumer&#39;s initial taste of the product. This may enhance the perception of indulgence of the product. 
     In some embodiments, each of the first, second, and third portions form a layer, such that the product comprises three layers. The second portion may be located between the first and third portions. The third portion may be formed by the partial coating or enrobing of the first and second layers. Preferably, the second portion is not visible through the first or third layers and/or the second portion is obscured by the first and third portions. For example, a consumer is unable to view the second portion from the outside until the confectionery product has been cut up or a bite taken thereof. 
     In some embodiments, the first portion forms an upper layer of the confectionery product. The first portion may be uncoated, or may comprise an uncoated region. In such embodiments, at least a part of the fruit and/or nut composition is visible to a consumer. This is desirable since it enhances the perception of ‘healthiness’ of the confectionery product. 
     The confectionery product may comprise at least 20 wt % of nuts. In some embodiments, the confectionery product comprises at least 25%, 30%, 35%, 45% or 50% nuts. In some embodiments, the confectionery product comprises no more than 70%, no more than 60% or no more than 50% nuts. 
     The confectionery product may comprise from 1 to 10 wt % fruit or dried fruit. In some embodiments, the confectionery product comprises from 2 to 8 wt %, from 4 to 6 wt % or 5 wt % fruit or dried fruit. 
     The confectionery product may comprise less than 40 g sugar per 100 g of product. In some embodiments, the confectionery product comprises less than 35 g, 30 g, 28 g, 26 g, 24 g, 22 g or 20 g of sugar per 100 g. In some embodiments, the confectionery product comprises no more than 15 g, no more than 12 g or no more than 10 g sugar over 100 g of product. Low sugar products may be achieved by, for example, substituting some or all of the glucose with a sugar replacer such as inuline or polyol. 
     The confectionery product may comprise less than 20 g of saturated fat per 100 g. In some embodiments, the confectionery product comprises less than 15 g, 12 g, 10 g, 9 g, or 8 g of saturated fat per 100 g. 
     According to a second aspect of the invention, there is provided a process for making a confectionery product, the process comprising:
         forming a first portion comprising a fruit and/or nut composition, and a binder;   forming a second portion comprising a confectionery composition; and   combining the first and second portions to form an intermediate;   applying a chocolate composition to the intermediate to form a third portion.       

     In some embodiments, the first and second portions are layers. Optionally, applying the chocolate composition may comprise fully or partially coating the intermediate. The intermediate may be fully or partially coated by enrobing. In some embodiments, partially enrobing or coating the intermediate comprises forming a half-shoulder enrobing, wherein the chocolate composition extends (completely) across one face and at least partially up some or all of the sides of the intermediate. 
     The confectionery product may be a confectionery product as described previously. 
     In some embodiments, the step of forming the first portion comprises using a first sheeter or roller to form a first layer. As will be known to those skilled in the art, a “sheeter” is a piece of equipment composed of one or two motorised rollers, with guides and/or knives configured to layer a sheet of material on a belt. 
     The first layer may have a thickness in the range of from 5 mm to 25 mm. In some embodiments, the first layer has a thickness of from 9 to 19 mm, from 11 to 17 mm, from 13 to 15 mm, or 14 mm. 
     In some embodiments, the step of forming the second portion comprises using a second sheeter and/or roller to form a second layer. 
     The second layer may have a thickness in the range of from 0.5 to 1.5 mm. In some embodiments the second layer has a thickness of from 0.7 to 1.2 mm, or from 0.8 to 1.0 mm. 
     In one series of embodiments, the process comprises forming the second portion first. Combining the first and second portions may comprise forming the first portion directly on the second portion. In such embodiments, it is thus important that the second portion is suitably viscous that it is not damaged by the formation of the first portion thereon. In such embodiments, the first and second sheeters and/or rollers may be configured in series. 
     In one series of embodiments, the first and second portions are formed separately. Combining the first and second portions may thus comprise positioning one of the first and second portions on top of the other of the first and second portions. In such embodiments, the first and second sheeters and/or rollers may be configured in parallel. 
     Optionally, the process may comprise cutting or dividing the layered intermediate into product portions prior to applying the chocolate composition. 
     As used herein, upper and lower limits from these ranges may be combinable. The first and second aspects of the invention, and their features may be combinable in any manner. 
     It will be appreciated that any of the embodiments described herein may be combined with each other and with the first or second aspects of the invention, unless otherwise stated. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES 
       Embodiments of the invention will now be described by way of example and with reference to the accompanying figures in which: 
         FIG. 1  shows a series of confectionery products; 
         FIG. 2  is a graph showing the results of a consumer test; and 
         FIG. 3  shows a further series of confectionery products. 
     
    
    
     EXAMPLE 1 
     A confectionery product was prepared according to the following method. 
     A chocolate flavoured filling, in particular a dark chocolate ganache, was prepared according to the following recipe: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Ingredient 
                 Wt % 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Dark chocolate mass 
                 19.9% 
               
               
                   
                 Cocoa Liquor 
                 14.9% 
               
               
                   
                 Glucose Syrup 
                 44.7% 
               
               
                   
                 Invert Sugar Syrup 
                 14.9% 
               
               
                   
                 Anhydrous Milk Fat 
                 5.0% 
               
               
                   
                 Salt 
                 0.4% 
               
               
                   
                 Soy lecithin 
                 0.3% 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The ingredients were gently mixed in a Hobart-type mixer at about 40° C. The fat was added first, followed by the emulsifier (lecithin), and then the syrups, chocolate and cocoa were progressively added. 
     Separately, two fruit and/or nut compositions (Ex 1. and Ex. 2) were formed by mixing 78 wt % of the dry ingredients with 22 wt % of the binder according to the two following recipes: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Dry Ingredient (wt %) 
                 Ex 1 
                 Ex 2 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                 Nuts-Almonds-Medium Roasted 
                 21.0% 
                 21.0% 
               
               
                 Chopped roasted almonds 6-9 mm 
                 35.0% 
                 43.0% 
               
               
                 Nuts-Peanuts-blanched-Roasted Medium-Halves 
                 38.0% 
                 20.0% 
               
               
                 Protein-Whey-Crisps 
                 6.0% 
                 10.0% 
               
               
                 Crunchy Cranberries 
                 — 
                 6.0% 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The ganache portion was transported to a first sheeter, having a 30-60 cm diameter roller which was cooled to below 0° C., and formed into a planar sheet of approximately 1 mm thickness. The fruit and/or nut compositions were transported to a second sheeter arranged in series and downstream of the first. The fruit and/or nut compositions were formed into a second layer directly on top of the ganache portion to provide two different intermediate products of approximately 14 mm thickness. The intermediate products were cooled for 15-25 minutes as they travelled through a temperature gradient from about 9 to about −5° C., and then cut into strips approximately 29 mm wide. Lastly, the intermediate products were enrobed with a conventional milk chocolate composition to provide a half-shoulder enrobing and thus form a third layer which extended across a face and up the sides of the intermediate products. The ganache portion was thus obscured between the fruit and/or nut composition and the chocolate enrobing. The chocolate composition was allowed to cool and the strips were cut to a length of approximately 100-110 mm to form the finished products with a weight of approximately 40 g. 
     Two final confectionery products were produced comprising fruit and/or nut compositions according to either Ex 1 or Ex 2, thereby forming Example Product 1 (EP1) and Example Product 2 (EP2) respectively. EP1 and EP2 had the following proportions: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
             
               
                   
               
               
                   
                 Proportion of final product 
               
               
                 Portion 
                 (wt %) 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                 Fruit and/or nut composition (Ex 1 or Ex 2) 
                 65% 
               
               
                 Chocolate flavoured filling 
                 15% 
               
               
                 Chocolate composition enrobing 
                 20% 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The final confectionery products had the following nutritional properties per 100 g: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 EP 1 
                 EP 2 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Kcal 
                 507 
                 491 
               
               
                   
                 KJoules 
                 2047 
                 1977 
               
               
                   
                 Fat 
                 33 
                 31 
               
               
                   
                 Saturated 
                 8 
                 8 
               
               
                   
                 Carbs 
                 31 
                 35 
               
               
                   
                 Sugar 
                 23 
                 26 
               
               
                   
                 Sodium 
                 0 
                 0 
               
               
                   
                 Protein 
                 16 
                 14 
               
               
                   
                 Fibre 
                 12 
                 12 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     EXAMPLE 2 
     The example products EP 1 and EP 2 were compared against existing confectionery products. Comparative products 1 to 3 are commercially available confectionery products. These products are typically perceived as indulgent treats by consumers. The nutritional data is set out in the table below: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Comp 1 
                 Comp 2 
                 Comp 3 
                 EP 1 
                 EP 2 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Energy, kcal per 
                 430 
                 445 
                 479 
                 507 
                 491 
               
               
                 100 g 
               
               
                 Fat, g 
                 15.5 
                 17 
                 23 
                 33 
                 31 
               
               
                 of with sat fat, g 
                 8.1 
                 8.9 
                 9.8 
                 8 
                 8 
               
               
                 Carbohydrates, g 
                 65 
                 64.5 
                 60 
                 31 
                 35 
               
               
                 of which sugar, g 
                 41.5 
                 37.5 
                 45 
                 23 
                 26 
               
               
                 Fibre, g 
                 4.5 
                 4.8 
                 2.5 
                 12 
                 12 
               
               
                 Protein, g 
                 5.4 
                 6.1 
                 7.3 
                 16 
                 14 
               
               
                 Salt, g 
                 0.57 
                 0.63 
                 0.45 
                 0 
                 0 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     EP1 and EP2 were found to provide similar consumer enjoyment to the comparative products 1 to 3. It was also noted that both EP 1 and EP2 had similar calorific characteristics as the comparative products, but had significantly lower levels of sugar. Similarly, EP 1 and EP2 both had higher levels of unsaturated ‘healthy’ fats, due to the increased nut content of the confectionery products. 
     EP1 and EP 2 were then compared with other commercially available products that are perceived as “healthy living” snacking products. Comparative products 4 and 5 are commercially available snack bar products. 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Comp 4 
                 Comp 5 
                 EP 1 
                 EP 2 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Energy, kcal per 
                 493 
                 464 
                 507 
                 491 
               
               
                   
                 100 g 
               
               
                   
                 Fat, g 
                 37 
                 24 
                 33 
                 31 
               
               
                   
                 of with sat fat, g 
                 8.1 
                 9.5 
                 8 
                 8 
               
               
                   
                 Carbohydrates, g 
                 40 
                 45.5 
                 31 
                 35 
               
               
                   
                 of which sugar, g 
                 14 
                 22 
                 23 
                 26 
               
               
                   
                 Fibre, g 
                 18 
                 13 
                 12 
                 12 
               
               
                   
                 Protein, g 
                 14 
                 10.1 
                 16 
                 14 
               
               
                   
                 Salt, g 
                 0.87 
                 0.79 
                 0 
                 0 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     EP 1 and EP 2 were shown to have comparable sugar and saturated fat content as the commercially available products, and had a similar perception of healthiness with consumers. 
     EXAMPLE 3 
     During the development process, the inventors tested 6 different prototype products, A to E, as shown in  FIG. 1 . The compositions are set out in the table below in percentage by weight (wt %) of the final prototype product: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
             
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                 A 
                 Milk chocolate 36.4%; 
               
               
                   
                 Nut mix and decoration comprising whole roasted almonds 21.7%, peanuts 
               
               
                   
                 19.7%, binder 11.9% (comprising inuline, honey, glucose syrup, flavourings and 
               
               
                   
                 additives), rice/corn crisp 2.7%; and 
               
               
                   
                 Praline comprising chocolate mass 6.4%, roasted hazelnut 5.3%, whole roasted 
               
               
                   
                 almond 2.3%. 
               
               
                 B 
                 Milk chocolate 25%; 
               
               
                   
                 Nut mix and decoration comprising whole roasted almonds 35.8%, chopped 
               
               
                   
                 hazelnuts 10.7%, binder 11% (comprising inuline, honey, glucose syrup, 
               
               
                   
                 flavourings and additives), rice/corn crisp 2.5%; and 
               
               
                   
                 Ganache comprising dark chocolate (70% cacao) 6.9%, Invert sugar syrup 6.0%, 
               
               
                   
                 milk fat &lt;1%, water &lt;1%. 
               
               
                 C 
                 Milk chocolate 25%; 
               
               
                   
                 Nut mix and decoration comprising whole roasted almonds 35.8%, chopped 
               
               
                   
                 hazelnuts 10.7%, binder 11% (comprising inuline, honey, glucose syrup, 
               
               
                   
                 flavourings and additives), rice/corn crisp 2.5%; and 
               
               
                   
                 Milk chocolate caramel comprising invert sugar syrup 7.1%, white chocolate 
               
               
                   
                 mass 6%, milk chocolate &lt;1%, milk fat &lt;1%, water &lt;1%. 
               
               
                 D 
                 Milk chocolate 35%; 
               
               
                   
                 Nut mix and decoration comprising whole roasted almonds 38.4%, chopped 
               
               
                   
                 hazelnuts 11.8%, binder 12.1% (comprising inuline, honey, glucose syrup, 
               
               
                   
                 flavourings and additives), rice/corn crisp 2.8%. 
               
               
                 E 
                 Milk chocolate 20%; 
               
               
                   
                 Nuts mix comprising whole roasted almonds 23.7%, peanuts 23.7%, binder 
               
               
                   
                 14.3% (comprising inuline, honey, glucose syrup, flavourings and additives), 
               
               
                   
                 rice/corn crisp 3.3%; and 
               
               
                   
                 Ganache comprising dark chocolate (70% cacao) 6.9%, Invert sugar syrup 6.0%, 
               
               
                   
                 milk fat &lt;1%, water &lt;1%. 
               
               
                 F 
                 Milk chocolate 32%; 
               
               
                   
                 Nuts mix comprising whole roasted almonds 14%, peanuts 14%, binder 8.8% 
               
               
                   
                 (comprising inuline, honey, glucose syrup, flavourings and additives), rice/corn 
               
               
                   
                 crisp 1.9%; and 
               
               
                   
                 Confectionery rope comprising binder 8.8%, rice/corn crisp 3.2%. 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     A panel of 32 consumers was then asked to compare the 6 prototypes A to F and score them from 1 to 5 according to their liking of the product and their perception of its healthiness. The results are plotted in the graph in  FIG. 2 . The results showed that prototype E, comprising a ganache layer, was the preferred option with the consumers and had the second highest score for healthiness. Products E and F had the highest scores for perceived healthiness, due in part to a high proportion of visible whole nuts. Prototype E was then referred for further development. 
     EXAMPLE 4 
     The inventors then carried out a further series of tests with the compositions as set out in the table below: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
             
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                 G 
                 Ganache 1: Hidden ganache layer with visible nut layer of chopped 
               
               
                   
                 almonds, chopped hazelnuts and crispies 
               
               
                 H 
                 Praline 1 - praline upper layer (50% nut butter; 50% milk chocolate) 
               
               
                   
                 of approx. 1-2 mm thick on top of a nut layer comprising almonds 
               
               
                   
                 and 10% crispies (milder nut taste) 
               
               
                 I 
                 Base of mixed nuts (chopped almonds and chopped hazelnuts) with 
               
               
                   
                 caramel rope in the centre 
               
               
                 J 
                 Ganache 2 - Hidden ganache layer with visible nut layer of almonds 
               
               
                   
                 (50% whole; 50% chopped), chopped hazelnuts and crispies 
               
               
                 K 
                 Praline 2 - praline upper layer (50% nut butter; 50% milk 
               
               
                   
                 chocolate) of approx. 1-2 mm thick on top of a nut layer comprising 
               
               
                   
                 almonds, hazelnuts and 6% crispies (stronger nut taste) 
               
               
                 L 
                 G or J nut layer with no Ganache 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     This trial was devised in order to identify the drivers of consumer liking. For example: L was compared against G to determine the effect of ganache on consumer perception; G was compared against J to determine the impact of almond size on the eating experience (i.e. how hard is it to chew); and H was compared against K to determine the flavour profile preference between almond and a mix of almond and hazelnuts. 
     Prototypes G and J comprised a chocolate ganache layer positioned between a first layer of a fruit and nut composition and a chocolate composition. 
     A panel of 50 consumers was then asked to compare the 6 prototypes G to L and score them from 1 to 9 on a range of criteria. Prototypes G and J comprising the ganache layer performed the best with the highest scores for being liked as well as having a healthy perception. Products containing a praline performed the least well. Prototype I was polarising—while it was largely popular with the consumers it was not perceived as healthy or being “better for you” than the alternative products, which was also supported by the nutritional data for this product which comprises 30% sugar. Prototype L was substantially the same as prototypes G and J, but without the ganache layer. Prototype L was found to perform more weakly than either G or J. The panel were then asked to score the prototypes on their appeal. 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Appearance 
                 Flavour 
                 Texture 
               
               
                   
                 appeal 
                 appeal 
                 appeal 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 G 
                 7.1 
                 6.6 
                 6.5 
               
               
                   
                 H 
                 5.0 
                 6.1 
                 5.5 
               
               
                   
                 I 
                 6.4 
                 6.8 
                 6.2 
               
               
                   
                 J 
                 7.0 
                 6.2 
                 6.1 
               
               
                   
                 K 
                 5.2 
                 5.7 
                 5.5 
               
               
                   
                 L 
                 6.2 
                 6.0 
                 5.6 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The results show that prototypes G and J, with high proportions of visible nuts and low proportions of visible chocolate had the highest visual appeal. In comparison, prototype H, comprising a layer of chocolate praline on the upper surface, had the lowest score for appearance. G and J, with the ganache layer, scored better than L, without ganache, for flavour. Both G and J scored highly for texture, with G (chopped nuts) being slightly preferred over J (chopped and whole nuts). The praline-containing products (H and K) again scored the lowest for texture. 
     The examples show that the inclusion of a ganache layer improves the flavour and overall appeal of the product, while an upper, visible layer of nuts provides an appearance which appeals to consumers and contributes to the product being perceived as healthy. Furthermore, a product that combines a visible nut layer, a ganache layer and chocolate enrobing has been found to have comparable levels of sugar and saturated fat as existing snack bars which are associated with healthy living.