Patent Publication Number: US-2022238044-A1

Title: Theft deterrent label and packaging incorporating the same

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/597,472 filed on Oct. 9, 2019, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/743,415 filed on Oct. 9, 2018, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 63/140,594 filed on Jan. 22, 2021, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. 
    
    
     FIELD 
     The subject disclosure relates to theft prevention and in particular, to a theft deterrent label and packaging incorporating the same 
     BACKGROUND 
     Shoplifting is a problem faced by almost all retailers. Not surprisingly therefore, antishoplifting systems such as electronic article surveillance (EAS) systems have become commonplace in retail establishments. The most commonly used EAS systems rely on Radio Frequency (RF) or Acousto-Magnetic (AM) technology. Nevertheless, all EAS systems work on the same underlying principle i.e., electronic communication between a detector that sends electromagnetic signals and anti-theft sensors which respond to the electromagnetic signals. In a typical EAS system within a retail establishment, anti-theft sensors are attached to merchandise of value and a detector is deployed at each entrance/exit of the retail establishment. When merchandise is purchased, the anti-theft sensor is either removed or deactivated at checkout from each piece of purchased merchandise allowing the purchased merchandise to pass through a detector without triggering an alarm. On the other hand, when merchandise carrying an active anti-theft sensor passes through a detector, an alarm is triggered to warn of the shoplifting attempt. While EAS systems have proven effective for the most part, shoplifters have devised clever ways to beat the technology. 
     In particular, in the case of EAS systems that rely on AM technology, because typical AM anti-theft sensors take the form of three-dimensional rigid packages, any appreciable bend in the packages (of more than a few degrees) may adversely affect the integrity of the AM anti-theft sensors and thus, degrade AM anti-theft sensor performance significantly. Also, typical AM anti-theft sensors have one surface with a pressure sensitive adhesive thereon to permit affixing of the AM anti-theft sensors to the merchandise to be protected. Affixing AM anti-theft sensors to merchandise in this manner does suffer drawbacks. Because the AM anti-theft sensors are exposed, an individual may insert a fingernail or suitable tool under the AM anti-theft sensors to break the adhesive bonds between the AM anti-theft sensors and the merchandise to be protected and pry the AM anti-theft sensors from the merchandise thus defeating the security feature. In the case of EAS systems that rely on RF technology, typical RF anti-theft sensors are flexible and comprise multiple layers of material and so do not suffer the bend problem associated with AM anti-theft sensors described above. That said however, like the AM anti-theft sensors, RF anti-theft sensors have an adhesive side to permit affixing of the RF anti-theft sensors to the merchandise to be protected. As a result, RF anti-theft sensors suffer drawbacks in that an individual may insert a fingernail or other suitable tool under the RF anti-theft sensors to break the adhesive bonds between the RF anti-theft sensors and the merchandise to be protected and pry the RF anti-theft sensors from the merchandise. 
     To make unauthorized removal of anti-theft sensors from merchandise more difficult, a sensor cover label made of destructible film and with a strong adhesive has been developed by Custom Security Industries Inc. of Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada and sold under the name AMProtect™ for Acousto-Magnetic anti-theft sensors and RFProtect™ for Radio Frequency anti-theft sensors. The sensor cover label, with an AM/RF anti-theft sensor thereunder, is configured to be affixed to merchandise to be protected so that the AM/RF anti-theft sensor is not exposed. When the sensor cover label and AM/RF anti-theft sensor combination is properly applied to a surface of the merchandise, the edges of the sensor cover label seal tightly to the surface of the merchandise, making it difficult to peel the edges of the sensor cover label up and away from the merchandise. Also, the destructible film of the sensor cover label readily fractures when attempts are made to peel the edges of the sensor cover label. As a result, it becomes a slow and laborious task to pick the sensor cover label off the merchandise to expose the underlying AM/RF anti-theft sensor and as a result, the sensor cover label acts as a good theft deterrent. 
     In some situations, the anti-theft sensors are deployed on packaging containing merchandise rather than on the merchandise itself or in addition to the anti-theft sensors on the merchandise. In such cases, rather than attempting to remove the anti-theft sensors from the packaging, a shoplifter may attempt to transfer contents of packaging containing high-priced merchandise to packaging containing low-priced merchandise, thereby allowing the shoplifter to purchase high-priced merchandise (now contained in the packaging for low-priced merchandise) for the price of the low-priced merchandise. Although reinforcing tape or other suitable seals may be applied to the openings or seams of the packaging to prevent access to the interior of the packaging and the transferring of contents therein, in many cases, the tape or seals are easy to defeat. 
     Improvements in theft deterrence are continually being sought. It is therefore an object to provide a novel theft deterrent label and packaging incorporating the same. 
     This background serves only to set a scene to allow a person skilled in the art to better appreciate the following description. Therefore, none of the above discussion should necessarily be taken as an acknowledgement that this discussion is part of the state of the art or is common general knowledge. 
     SUMMARY 
     It should be appreciated that this summary is provided to introduce a selection of concepts in a simplified form that are further described below in the detailed description. This summary is not intended to be used to limit the scope of the claimed subject matter. 
     Accordingly, in one aspect there is provided a theft deterrent label comprising: a flexible body portion, the body portion comprising: a first destructible section; a second destructible section, the first destructible section and the second destructible section each having at least one weakness pattern provided therein; and a non-destructible section interposed between the first destructible section and the second destructible section and substantially devoid of any weakness pattern. 
     In one or more embodiments, the first destructible section is intended to overlie an anti-theft sensor, tag, other label or the like. In one form, the first destructible section has a weakness pattern provided therein that is different than or the same as the weakness pattern provided in the second destructible section. 
     In one or more embodiments, the first destructible section and second destructible section are fracturable in multiple directions. 
     In one or more embodiments, the non-destructible section is fracture-resistant in substantially all directions. 
     In one or more embodiments, the first destructible section, the second destructible section and the non-destructible section are formed of the same material or wherein at least some of the sections are formed of different materials. 
     In one or more embodiments, the theft deterrent label further comprises an adhesive layer on a bottom surface of the body portion. 
     In one or more embodiments, the weakness pattern provided in the first destructible section surrounds an interior region devoid of any weakness pattern, the interior region having a dimensional footprint larger than a dimensional footprint of the anti-theft sensor, tag, other label or the like to be overlaid. 
     In one or more embodiments, the theft deterrent label further comprises printed messaging and/or indicia on an upper surface of the body portion. In one form, the printed messaging and/or indicia is at least on the upper surface of the body portion within the first destructible section. In another form, an alignment feature is provided on the upper surface of the body portion within the non-destructible section. 
     In one or more embodiments, each weakness pattern comprises lines of perforations, holes and/or cuts provided in the body portion. 
     According to another aspect there is provided a theft deterrent label for affixing to merchandise package, comprising a fracture-resistant thin film layer having an adhesive layer on one major surface thereof, the thin film layer comprising a first destructible section and a second destructible section that are each fracturable in one or more of directions, and a non-destructible section separating the first and second destructible sections, the non-destructible section being fracture-resistant in substantially all directions. 
     In one or more embodiments, the first and second destructible sections have weakness patterns provided therein. In one form, the weakness patterns provided in the first and second destructible sections are one of (i) the same or (ii) different. In another form, the non-destructible section is substantially devoid of any weakness pattern. 
     In one or more embodiments, the theft deterrent label is generally rectangular in top plan and wherein the first and second destructible sections are longitudinally spaced apart and separated by the non-destructible section. In another form, the theft deterrent label is generally rectangular in top plan and wherein the first and second destructible sections extend longitudinally along the length of the theft deterrent label and are separated by the non-destructible section. 
     In one or more embodiments, the theft deterrent label further comprises printed messaging and/or indicia on an opposite major surface of the thin film layer. In one form, the printed messaging and/or indicia is at least on the opposite major surface within the first destructible section. 
     In one or more embodiments, the theft deterrent label further comprises an alignment feature on an opposite major surface of the thin film layer within the non-destructible section. 
     In one or more embodiments, each weakness pattern comprises lines of weakness provided in the thin film layer. In one form, the lines of weakness comprise zig-zag lines inwardly spaced from outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label. In another form, the lines of weakness further comprise spaced lines extending between the zig-zag lines and the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label. 
     According to another aspect there is provided a theft deterrent label for affixing to merchandise packaging, comprising: a flexible body portion, the body portion comprising: a first destructible section intended to be affixed to a first surface of the merchandise packaging and overlie an anti-theft sensor thereby to trap the anti-theft sensor between the theft deterrent label and the first surface, the first destructible section having a dimensional footprint larger than a dimensional footprint of the anti-theft sensor; a second destructible section intended to be affixed to a second surface of the merchandise packaging, the first destructible section and the second destructible section each having at least one weakness pattern provided therein; and a first non-destructible section interposed between the first destructible section and the second destructible section and substantially devoid of any weakness pattern, the first non-destructible section intended to extend over an opening or seam in the merchandise packaging. 
     In one or more embodiments, the body portion further comprises a third destructible section having at least one weakness pattern provided therein and a second non-destructible section interposed between the first destructible section and the third destructible section, the second non-destructible section substantially devoid of any weakness pattern. In one form, the second destructible section is longitudinally separated from the first destructible section by the first non-destructible section and wherein the third destructible section extends longitudinally in parallel with the first destructible section. In another form, the second non-destructible section is intended to extend over the opening or seam in the merchandise packaging. In another form, each weakness pattern comprises lines of weakness provided in the body portion. In another form, the lines of weakness comprise zig-zag lines inwardly spaced from outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label. 
     In one or more embodiments, the weakness pattern provided in the first destructible section surrounds at least a portion of an interior region devoid of any weakness pattern, the interior region having a dimensional footprint larger than a dimensional footprint of the anti-theft sensor. 
     In one or more embodiments, the theft deterrent label of any one of paragraphs [0010] to [0026] is provided in combination with an anti-theft sensor. 
     In one or more embodiments, the theft deterrent label of any one of paragraphs [0010] to [0026] is provided in combination with an anti-theft sensor or the like and merchandise packaging. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       Embodiments will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters are used to indicate like components and in which: 
         FIG. 1 a    is a top plan view of a theft deterrent label; 
         FIG. 1 b    is a side view of the theft deterrent label of  FIG. 1   a;    
         FIG. 2  is a top plan view of an anti-theft sensor; 
         FIG. 3  is a perspective view of packaging in the form of a box in a partially open condition; 
         FIG. 4  is another perspective view of the box of  FIG. 3  in a closed condition with the theft deterrent label of  FIG. 1 a    affixed thereto; 
         FIG. 5  is a top plan view of the box and theft deterrent label of  FIG. 4 ; 
         FIG. 6  is a cross-sectional view of the lid of the box of  FIG. 5  taken along line  6 - 6 ; 
         FIG. 7  is a perspective view of packaging in the form of an alternative box in a partially open condition; 
         FIG. 8  is another perspective view of the box of  FIG. 8  with the theft deterrent label of  FIG. 1 a    partially affixed thereto; 
         FIG. 9  is another perspective view of the box of  FIG. 8  with the theft deterrent label fully affixed thereto; 
         FIG. 10  is a top plan view of an alternative theft deterrent label; 
         FIG. 11  is a perspective view of packaging in the form of yet another box in a partially open condition and with the theft deterrent label of  FIG. 10  partially affixed thereto; 
         FIG. 12  is a perspective view of the box of  FIG. 11  in a closed condition and with the theft deterrent label of  FIG. 10  fully affixed thereto; 
         FIG. 13  is a top plan view of yet another theft deterrent label; 
         FIG. 14  is a top plan view of yet another theft deterrent label; 
         FIGS. 15 a  to 15 d    are perspective views of packaging in the form of a box with the theft deterrent label of  FIG. 14  fully affixed thereto at different locations on the box; and 
         FIGS. 16 a  to 16 f    show different weakness patterns for use in theft deterrent labels. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of certain examples, will be better understood when read with the accompanying drawings. As used herein, an element or feature introduced in the singular and preceded by the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not necessarily excluding the plural of the elements or features. Further, references to “one example” or “one embodiment” are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional examples or embodiments that also incorporate the described elements or features. Moreover, unless explicitly stated to the contrary, examples or embodiments “comprising” or “having” or “including” an element or feature or a plurality of elements or features having a particular property may include additional elements or features not having that property. Also, it will be appreciated that the terms “comprises”, “has”, “includes” means “including by not limited to” and the terms “comprising”, “having” and “including” have equivalent meanings. 
     As used herein, the term “and/or” can include any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed elements or features. 
     It will be understood that when an element or feature is referred to as being, for example, “on”, “attached” to, “connected” to, “coupled” with, “contacting”, “affixed” to, etc. another element or feature, that element or feature can be directly on, attached to, connected to, coupled with, contacting or affixed to the other element or feature or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element or feature is referred to as being, for example, “directly on”, “directly attached” to, “directly connected” to, “directly coupled” with, “directly contacting”, “directly affixed” to, etc. another element or feature, there are no intervening elements or features present. 
     Reference herein to “example” means that one or more feature, structure, element, component, characteristic and/or operational step described in connection with the example is included in at least one embodiment and/or implementation of the subject matter according to the subject disclosure. Thus, the phrases “an example,” “another example,” and similar language throughout the subject disclosure may, but do not necessarily, refer to the same example. Further, the subject matter characterizing any one example may, but does not necessarily, include the subject matter characterizing any other example. 
     It will be understood that spatially relative terms, such as “under”, “below”, “lower”, “over”, “above”, “upper”, “front”, “back”, “top”, “bottom” and the like, may be used herein for ease of description to describe the relationship of an element or feature to another element or feature as illustrated in the figures. The spatially relative terms can however, encompass different orientations in use or operation in addition to the orientations depicted in the figures. 
     As used herein, the term “configured” means that the element, component, or other subject matter is designed and/or intended to perform a given function. Thus, the use of the term “configured” should not be construed to mean that a given element, component, or other subject matter is simply “capable of” performing a given function but that the element, component, and/or other subject matter is specifically selected, created, implemented, utilized, and/or designed for the purpose of performing the function. Subject matter that is described as being configured to perform a particular function may additionally or alternatively be described as being operative or adapted to perform that function. 
     Unless otherwise indicated, the terms “first,” “second,” “third,” etc. are used herein merely as labels, and are not intended to impose ordinal, positional, or hierarchical requirements on the items to which these terms refer. Moreover, reference to a “second” item does not require or preclude the existence of a lower-numbered item (e.g., a “first” item) and/or a higher-numbered item (e.g., a “third” item). 
     As used herein, the terms “approximately”, “about”, “substantially”, “generally”, etc. represent an amount or condition close to the stated amount or condition (i.e. a permissible variation) that still results in the desired function being performed or the desired result being achieved. For example, the terms “approximately”, “about”, “substantially”, “generally” etc. may refer to an amount or condition that is within engineering tolerances to the precise value or condition specified that would be readily appreciated by a person skilled in the art. 
     In general, a theft deterrent label is described and comprises a flexible body portion that at least comprises first and second destructible sections separated by a non-destructible section. The first and second destructible sections have weakness patterns provided therein which allow the first and second destructible sections to fracture in one or more directions. The non-destructible section is substantially devoid of any weakness pattern and as a result is fracture-resistant in substantially all directions. The first and second destructible sections are difficult to peel from packaging when adhered thereto due to their propensity to fracture. The non-destructible section is difficult to cut due its fracture resistance. Exemplary theft deterrent labels will now be further described with reference to the figures. 
     Turning now to  FIGS. 1 a  and 1 b   , a theft deterrent label is shown and is generally identified by reference number  100 . In this embodiment, the theft deterrent label  100  is configured to be used in conjunction with an anti-theft sensor, such as an Acousto-Magnetic (AM) sensor or Radio Frequency (RF) anti-theft sensor. In use, the theft deterrent label  100  is configured to overlie and trap the anti-theft sensor between the theft deterrent label  100  and merchandise packaging thereby to inhibit direct access to the anti-theft sensor as well as to extend across and seal an opening or seam of the merchandize packaging to inhibit opening of the merchandise packaging as will be described. For example, the merchandise packaging may be a box, carton, container, parcel, folder, etc. 
     As can be seen, the theft deterrent label  100  in this embodiment is generally rectangular in plan and comprises a flexible body formed of a thin film layer  102  having a major upper surface  104  and an opposite major bottom surface  106 . The thin film layer  102  is formed of plastic material, such as polyester, generally having a resistance to fracturing in all directions. In this embodiment, the thin film layer  102  has a thickness in the range of from about 0.0005 inches to about 0.002 inches. As will be appreciated, gaining access to edges of the theft deterrent label  100  becomes more difficult as label thickness decreases. That said, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the thin film layer may have a thickness greater than or less than the above stated range. 
     A thin or ultra-thin layer of aggressive, high tack adhesive  108  is provided on the major bottom surface  106  to allow the theft deterrent label  100  to be firmly affixed to the merchandise packaging with the anti-theft sensor trapped between the theft deterrent label  100  and the merchandise packaging. The adhesive layer  108  is common to the label industry and works well both at room temperatures and at low (i.e., freezer) temperatures. 
     The theft deterrent label  100  has a relatively small footprint to minimize its impact on aesthetics and/or printed areas of the merchandise packaging to which it is affixed. In this embodiment, the dimensions of the theft deterrent label are 3½ inches by 1⅜ inches. Those of skill in the art will however appreciate that the geometric shape and dimensions of the theft deterrent label  100  can be varied as needed to suit the environment in which the theft deterrent label  100  is deployed. 
     The thin film layer  102  comprises a plurality of sections or regions. In this embodiment, the thin film layer  102  comprises three (3) sections, namely a first destructible section  110 , a second destructible section  112 , and a non-destructible section  114  interposed between the first and second destructible sections  110  and  112 . The resistance to fracturing of the thin film layer  102  in the first and second destructible sections  110  and  112  is deliberately compromised while the resistance to fracturing of the thin film layer  102  in the non-destructible section  114  is maintained substantially fully intact. 
     The first destructible section  110  is the primary or largest of the three sections and is generally rectangular in plan. Formations of weakness in the form of small discrete perforations (e.g. punctures, holes etc.) are provided through the thin film layer  102  in the first destructible section  110  and are arranged to form a weakness pattern. In this embodiment, the weakness pattern is in the form of a substantially continuous, generally rectangular ring  120  having an outer periphery that is inwardly spaced from the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  100 . The generally rectangular ring  120  surrounds an interior region  122  that is devoid of any formations of weakness. The sides of the generally rectangular ring  120  are defined by lines of discrete perforations that zig-zag. The configurations of the zig-zag or saw-tooth lines defining the long sides of the generally rectangular ring  120  are substantially the same. The configurations of the zig-zag lines defining the short sides of the generally rectangular ring  120  are different from each other and are different from the zig-zag lines defining the long sides of the generally rectangular ring  120 . In particular, the pattern of the zig-zag line adjacent the free end of the theft deterrent label  100  has a smaller amplitude and higher frequency than the pattern of the zig-zag line adjacent the non-destructive section  114 . 
     The interior region  122  is configured to overlie and may obscure an anti-theft sensor  126  (see  FIG. 2 ) when the theft deterrent label  100  is affixed to merchandise packaging as will be described. To achieve this, the interior region  122  has dimensions larger than the dimensions of the anti-theft sensor  126  (i.e. the interior region  122  has a larger dimensional footprint than the dimensional footprint of the anti-theft sensor  126 ). 
     Printed messaging and/or indicia designated by the dotted lines  128  may be provided on the upper major surface  102  of the thin film layer  102  within the interior region  122 . The printed messaging and/or indicia make take a variety of forms. For example, the printed messaging and/or indicia may provide a warning to shoplifters of the existence of the anti-theft sensor  126 . Alternatively or in addition to, the printed messaging and/or indicia may include logos, advertising, or other information. As will be appreciated, the printed messaging and/or indicia aids in camouflaging the anti-theft sensor  126  over which the theft deterrent label  100  rests. 
     The second destructible section  112  is secondary or smaller and is generally rectangular in plan. The second destructible section  112  is positioned adjacent one end of the first destructible region  110  and acts as a foldable tab or wing. Formations of weakness in the form of small discrete perforations (e.g. punctures, holes etc.) are provided through the thin film layer  102  in the second destructible section  112 . In this embodiment, the discrete perforations are arranged to form a weakness pattern in the form of a shallow “U”  130  having an outer periphery that is inwardly spaced from the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  100 . The arms and bight of the shallow “U” are defined by lines of discrete perforations that zig-zag. The zig-zag lines are generally consistent over the shallow “U”  130 . Printed messaging and/or indicia (e.g. a logo, advertising, etc.) may also be provided on the upper major surface  102  of the thin film layer  102  within the second destructible section  112 . 
     The non-destructible section  114  is positioned between and longitudinally separates the first destructible section  110  and the second destructible section  112 . The non-destructible section  114  is constituted by a region of the thin film layer  102  substantially devoid of any formations of weakness. The non-destructible section  114  comprises a printed alignment mark  136  in the form of a dashed line that extends substantially across the width of the theft deterrent label  100 . 
     As mentioned above, the theft deterrent label  100  is configured to overlie and trap the anti-theft sensor  126 , such as an Acousto-Magnetic (AM) sensor or Radio Frequency (RF) anti-theft sensor, between the theft deterrent label  100  and merchandise packaging as well as to extend across and seal an opening or seam of the merchandise packaging. 
     For example, turning now to  FIGS. 3 to 6 , merchandise packaging in the form of a box  150  is shown. The box  150  in this embodiment is rectangular in plan and has a box body  152  comprising a base  154 , upstanding front, rear and side walls  156   a ,  156   b  and  156   c , respectively, upper closure flaps  158  hingedly connected to the side walls  156   c  and a lid  160  hingedly connected to the rear wall  156   b . A flange  162  depends from the forward peripheral edge of the lid  160 . The lid  160  can be pivoted upwardly relative to the box body  152  to expose the interior of the box  150  and any contents therein as shown in  FIG. 3  and can be pivoted downwardly towards the box body  152  to close the box  150  with the flange  162  tucked into the box  150  behind the front wall  156   a  as shown in  FIGS. 4 and 5 . 
     To make access to the interior of the box  150  difficult and time consuming and thereby provide theft deterrence, the theft deterrent label  100  can be affixed to the box  150  via the adhesive layer  108  as shown in  FIGS. 4 to 6 . In this embodiment, the theft deterrent label  100  is positioned so the first destructible section  110  is affixed to the lid  160  of the box  150  with the interior region  122  overlying the anti-theft sensor  126 . Because the interior region  122  has larger dimensions than the anti-theft sensor  126 , the interior region  122  completely surrounds the anti-theft sensor  126  and adheres to the lid  160  about the entire periphery of the anti-theft sensor  126 . As a result, direct access to the anti-theft sensor  126  is inhibited. The alignment mark  136  facilitates alignment of the non-destructible section  114  with the opening or seam of the box  150  between the lid  160  and the box body  152 . The second destructible section  112 , which is oriented generally at a 90 degree angle with respect to the first destructible section  110 , is affixed to the front wall  156   a  of the box  150 . 
     During application of the theft deterrent label  100  to the box  150 , the first destructible section  110  may be initially affixed to the lid  160  of the box  150  with the anti-theft sensor  126  trapped between the first destructible section  110  and the lid  160  and then the theft deterrent label  100  may be folded downwardly to affix the second destructible section  112  to the front wall  156   a  of the box  150 . Those of skill in the art will however appreciate that the theft deterrent label  100  may be affixed to the box  150  in the reverse order; that is the second destructible section  112  may be initially affixed to the front wall  156   a  of the box  150  and then the theft deterrent label  100  may be folded over to affix the first destructible section  110  to the lid  160  of the box  150 . Of course, both the first and second destructible sections  110  and  112 , respectively, can be affixed to the lid  160  and front wall  156   a  basically simultaneously. 
     Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the theft deterrent label  100  may alternatively be affixed to the lid  160  and one of the side walls  156   c  of the box  150 . Also, the orientation of the theft deterrent label  100  may be reversed so that the first destructible section  110  is affixed to the front wall  156   a  or to one of the side walls  156   c  of the box  150  and the second destructible section  112  is affixed to the lid  160  of the box  150 . 
     Because the theft deterrent label  100  comprises a thin film layer  102 , it is difficult to grab or gain a fingerhold on any of the edges of the theft deterrent label  100  making the theft deterrent label  100  difficult to remove from the box  150 . If an edge fingerhold is obtained on any edge of the theft deterrent label  150  in either the first or second destructible sections  110  and  112 , respectively, and an attempt is made to peel the theft deterrent label  100  from the box  150 , the weakness patterns defined by the formations of weakness cause the theft deterrent label to fracture in one or more directions making the exercise of peeling the theft deterrent label  100  from the box  150  time consuming as multiple attempts are required. The non-destructible section  114  which extends across the opening or seam between the lid  160  and the box body  152  retains its inherent strength due to the absence of any formations of weakness making the theft deterrent label  100  difficult to cut at the opening or seam. 
     As will be appreciated, the theft deterrent label  100  combines the inherent strength and thickness of the film layer  102 , the weakness patterns, and the bonding strength of the adhesive layer  108  to combat shoplifting attempts while providing robust sealing capabilities. In particular, the inherent strength and thickness of the film layer  102  and the bonding strength of the adhesive layer  108  ensure that it will be difficult to grab an edge of the theft deterrent label  100  in an attempt to peel the theft deterrent label  100  from merchandise packaging. Should an attempt to peel the theft deterrent label  100  from merchandise packaging be successful, the weakness patterns defined by the formations of weakness ensure that the theft deterrent label  100  fractures in one or more directions thereby to thwart peeling of the theft deterrent label  100  from the merchandise packaging. 
     As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, the theft deterrent label  100  is suitable for use on other forms of merchandise packaging. For example, turning now to  FIGS. 7 to 9 , merchandise packaging in the form of an alternative box  170  is shown. The box  170  in this embodiment is rectangular in plan and has a box body  172  and a lid (not visible) hingedly connected to the box body  172 . A panel  182  depends from the forward peripheral edge of the lid and has a pair of wings  184  at opposite ends thereof that are received in openings between the front wall  176   a  of the box  170  and the side walls  176   c  of the box. The panel  182  can be pivoted relative to the lid of the box  170  to remove the wings  184  from the openings (as partially shown in  FIG. 7 ) thereby to allow the lid to be pivoted upwardly relative to the box body  172  to expose the interior of the box  170  and any contents therein. In the closed position as shown in  FIGS. 8 and 9 , the panel  182  overlies the front wall  176   a  of the box  170  and the wings  184  are fully received in the openings between the front wall  176   a  and the side walls  176   c  of the box. 
     To make access to the interior of the box  170  difficult and time consuming and thereby provide theft deterrence, the theft deterrent label  100  can be affixed to the box  170  via the adhesive layer  108  as shown in  FIGS. 8 and 9 . In this embodiment, the theft deterrent label  100  is positioned so the first destructible section  110  is affixed to the base  174  of the box  170  with the interior region  122  overlying the anti-theft sensor  126 . The alignment mark  136  facilitates alignment of the non-destructible section  114  with the opening or seam between the panel  182  and the front wall  176   a  of box body  152 . The second destructible section  112 , which is oriented generally at a 90 degree angle with respect to the first destructible section  110 , is affixed to the panel  182  that overlies the front wall  176   a  of the box  150 . 
     As shown in  FIG. 8 , during application of the theft deterrent label  100  to the box  170 , the first destructible section  110  is initially affixed to the base  174  of the box  170  with the anti-theft sensor  126  trapped between the first destructible section  110  and the base  174  and then the theft deterrent label  100  is folded over to affix the second destructible section  112  to the panel  182  thereby to fully affix the theft deterrent label  100  to the box  170 . Those of skill in the art will however appreciate that the theft deterrent label  100  may be affixed to the box  170  in the reverse order; that is the second destructible section  112  may be initially affixed to the panel  182  and then the theft deterrent label  100  may be folded to affix the first destructible section  110  to the base  174  thereby to fully affix the theft deterrent label  100  to the box  170 . Of course, both the first and second destructible sections  110  and  112 , respectively, can be affixed to the base  174  and panel  182  basically simultaneously. Also, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the theft deterrent label  100  may be affixed to the box  170  at other locations. 
     Turning now to  FIG. 10 , an alternative theft deterrent label is shown and is generally identified by reference numeral  200 . Similar to the previous embodiment, the theft deterrent label  200  comprises a thin film layer formed of plastic material, such as polyester. A thin or ultra-thin layer of aggressive, high tack adhesive is provided on the bottom major surface of the thin film layer to allow the theft deterrent label  200  to be firmly affixed to merchandise packaging with the anti-theft sensor trapped between the theft deterrent label  200  and the merchandise packaging. 
     As will be appreciated, the theft deterrent label  200  is very similar to the theft deterrent label  100  shown in  FIGS. 1 a  and 1 b   ; the differences being the weakness patterns defined by the formations of weakness in the first and second destructible sections  210  and  212 , respectively, and the footprint of the printed messaging and/or indicia designated by the dotted lines  228 . 
     In this embodiment, the discrete perforations provided in the first destructible section  210  are similarly arranged to form a weakness pattern in the form a substantially continuous, generally rectangular ring  220  having an outer periphery that is inwardly spaced from the peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  200 . The generally rectangular ring  220  surrounds an interior region  222  that is devoid of any formations of weakness. The sides of the generally rectangular ring  120  are defined by lines of discrete perforations that zig-zag. The configurations of the zig-zag lines defining the long sides of the generally rectangular ring  220  and the short side of the generally rectangular ring adjacent one end of the theft deterrent label  200  are substantially the same. The configuration of the zig-zag line defining the other short side of the generally rectangular ring  120  is different. In particular, the pattern of the zig-zag line adjacent the non-destructive section  214  has a smaller amplitude and higher frequency than the pattern of the other zig-zag lines. In addition to the zig-zag lines that form the generally rectangular ring  220 , discrete perforations are also arranged to form a series of spaced, straight lines  240  that extend inwardly from the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  200  towards the generally rectangular ring  220 . In this embodiment, the lines  240  do not intersect the generally rectangular ring  220 . 
     The discrete perforations provided in the second destructible section  212  are arranged to form a weakness pattern in the form a shallow “U”  230  having an outer periphery that is inwardly spaced from the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  200 . The arms and the bight of the shallow “U” are defined by zig-zag lines of discrete perforations that are generally consistent over the shallow ‘U”  230  and similar to the zig-zag lines forming the generally rectangular ring  220 . In addition to the zig-zag lines that form the shallow “U”, discrete perforations are also arranged to form a series of spaced, straight lines  242  that extend inwardly from the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  200  towards the shallow “U”  230 . In this embodiment, the lines  242  do not intersect the shallow “U”  230 . 
     The printed messaging and/or indicia  228  on the upper surface of the first destructible section  210  in this embodiment has a larger footprint than in the previous embodiment and extends over part of the generally rectangular ring  220 . 
       FIGS. 11 and 12  show the theft deterrent label  200  affixed to merchandise packaging in the form of a box  250  that is similar to box  150  shown in  FIGS. 3 to 5 . As shown in  FIG. 11 , during application of the theft deterrent label  200  to the box  250 , the first destructible section  210  is initially affixed to the front wall  256   a  of the box  250  with the anti-theft sensor trapped between the first destructible section  210  and the front wall  256   a  and then the theft deterrent label  200  is folded over to affix the second destructible section  212  to the lid  260  of the box thereby to fully affix the theft deterrent label  200  to the box  250  with the non-destructible section  214  extending over an opening or seam of the box  250 . Those of skill in the art will however appreciate that the first and second destructible sections  210  and  212  of the theft deterrent label  200  may be affixed to the box  170  in the reverse order or basically simultaneously. Also, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the theft deterrent label  200  may be affixed to the box  250  at other locations. 
     Similar to the previous embodiment, the theft deterrent label  200  makes access to the interior of the box  250  difficult and time consuming thereby to provide theft deterrence. The weakness patterns comprising the zig-zag lines in conjunction with the spaced lines  240  and  242  enhances fracturing of the first and second destructible sections  210  and  212  when attempts are made to peel these sections of the theft deterrent label  200  from merchandise packaging. Like the previous embodiment, the non-destructible section  214 , which extends across an opening or seam of the merchandise packaging when the theft deterrent label  200  is deployed, is difficult to cut thereby to inhibit opening of the merchandise packaging. 
     Turning now to  FIG. 13 , yet another theft deterrent label is shown and is generally identified by reference numeral  300 . Similar to the previous embodiments, the theft deterrent label  300  comprises a thin film layer formed of plastic material, such as polyester. A thin or ultra-thin layer of aggressive, high tack adhesive is provided on the bottom major surface of the thin film layer to allow the theft deterrent label  300  to be firmly affixed to merchandise packaging with the anti-theft sensor trapped between the theft deterrent label  400  and the merchandise packaging. 
     As will be appreciated, the theft deterrent label  300  is also similar to theft deterrent label  100  shown in  FIGS. 1 a  and 1 b   . In this embodiment, the second destructible section  312  extends longitudinally along one side of (i.e. in parallel with) the first destructible section  310 . The non-desctructible section  314  is interposed between and separates the first and second non-destructible sections  310  and  312 . The non-destructible section  314  comprises a printed alignment mark  336  in the form of a dashed line that extends substantially across the length of the theft deterrent label  300 . 
     The discrete perforations provided in the first destructible section  310  are arranged to form a weakness pattern in the form a discontinuous, generally rectangular ring  320  having an outer periphery that is inwardly spaced from the peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  300 . The generally rectangular ring  320  surrounds an interior region  322  that is devoid of any formations of weakness. The sides of the generally rectangular ring  320  are defined by lines of discrete perforations that zig-zag. The configurations of the zig-zag lines defining the short sides of the generally rectangular ring  320  and the long side of the generally rectangular ring  320  adjacent one side of the theft deterrent label  300  are substantially the same. The configuration of the zig-zag line defining the other long side of the generally rectangular ring  320  is different. In particular, the pattern of the zig-zag line adjacent the non-destructive section  314  has a smaller amplitude and higher frequency than the pattern of the other zig-zag lines. In addition to the zig-zag lines that form the generally rectangular ring  320 , discrete perforations are also arranged to form a series of spaced, straight lines  340  that extend inwardly from the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  300  towards the generally rectangular ring  320 . In this embodiment, the lines  340  do not intersect the generally rectangular ring  320  and do not extend to the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  300 . 
     The discrete perforations provided in the second destructible section  312  are arranged to form a weakness pattern in the form a very shallow “U”  330  having an outer periphery that is inwardly spaced from the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  300 . The arms and the bight of the shallow “U” are defined by zig-zag lines of discrete perforations that are generally consistent over the shallow ‘U”  330 . In addition to the zig-zag lines that form the shallow “U”, discrete perforations are also arranged to form a series of spaced, straight lines  342  that extend inwardly from the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  300  towards the shallow “U”  330 . In this embodiment, the lines  342  do not intersect the shallow “U”  330  and do not extend to the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  300 . 
     In the above-embodiments, the weakness patterns provided in the first destructible sections  110  and  210  form substantially continuous, generally rectangular rings. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the discrete perforations need not be arranged to from continuous rings. The rings may be discontinuous. Also, the rings need not be rectangular in shape. The rings may take other suitable geometric or complex shapes. Similarly, the weakness patterns provided in the second destructible sections  112  and  212  need not be arranged to form shallow “U”s. The discrete perforations can be arranged to take other suitable shapes or forms. 
     In the embodiments described above, the theft deterrent labels comprise two destructible sections  110  and  112  allowing the theft deterrent labels to overlie anti-theft sensors as well as bridge openings or seams of merchandise packaging to act as seals. Theft deterrent labels with additional destructible sections are of course possible. 
     For example, turning now to  FIG. 14 , another embodiment of a theft deterrent label is shown and is generally identified by reference numeral  400 . In this embodiment, the theft deterrent label  400  is configured to overlie an anti-theft sensor and trap the anti-theft sensor between the theft deterrent label  400  and merchandise packaging thereby to inhibit direct access to the anti-theft sensor as well as to extend across and seal an opening or seam of the merchandise packaging at multiple locations as will be described. 
     Similar to the previous embodiments, the theft deterrent label  400  comprises a thin film layer formed of plastic material, such as polyester. A thin or ultra-thin layer of aggressive, high tack adhesive is provided on the bottom major surface of the thin film layer to allow the theft deterrent label  400  to be firmly affixed to merchandise packaging with the anti-theft sensor trapped between the theft deterrent label  400  and the merchandise packaging. 
     The thin film layer of the theft deterrent label  400  comprises a plurality of section or regions. In this embodiment, the thin film layer comprises a first or primary destructible section  410 , a second destructible section  412  that acts as a foldable tab or wing adjacent one end of the first destructible region  410 , a first non-destructible section  414  interposed between the first and second destructible sections  410  and  412 , a third destructible section  416  extending longitudinally along one side of the first destructible region  410  that acts as a tab or wing, and a second non-destructible section  418  interposed between the first and third destructible sections  410  and  416 . The resistance to fracturing of the theft deterrent label  400  in the first, second and third destructible sections  410 ,  412 , and  416 , respectively, is deliberately compromised while the resistance to fracturing of the theft deterrent label  400  in the first and second non-destructible sections  414  and  418  is maintained substantially fully intact. 
     In this embodiment, discrete perforations arranged to form a weakness pattern  420  in the shape of an “L” are provided in the first destructible section  410 . The weakness pattern  420  partially surrounds an interior region  422  that is substantially devoid of any formations of weakness. The arms of the weakness pattern  420  are defined by similar lines of discrete perforations that zig-zag. In addition to the zig-zag lines, discrete perforations are also arranged to form a series of spaced, straight lines  440  that extend inwardly from the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  400  towards the zig-zag lines. In this embodiment, the lines  440  do not intersect the zig-zag lines and do not extend to the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  400 . 
     Printed messaging and/or indicia may be provided on the upper major surface of the thin film layer within the interior region  422 . The printed messaging and/or indicia make take a variety of forms. For example, the printed messaging and/or indicia may provide a warning to shoplifters of the existence of the anti-theft sensor. Alternatively or in addition to, the printed messaging and/or indicia may include logos, advertising, or other information. 
     Discrete perforations arranged to form a weakness pattern  430  in the shape of a “U” are provided in the second destructible section  412 . The arms and bight of the weakness pattern  430  are defined by similar lines of discrete perforations that zig-zag. In addition to the zig-zag lines, discrete perforations are also arranged to form a series of spaced, straight lines  442  that extend inwardly from the outer peripheral of the theft deterrent label  400  towards the zig-zag lines. In this embodiment, the lines  442  do not intersect the zig-zag lines and do not extend to the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  400 . 
     Discrete perforations arranged to form a linear weakness pattern  450  are provided in the third destructible section  416 . The linear weakness pattern  450  is defined by a line of discrete perforations that zig-zags. In addition to the zig-zag line, discrete perforations are also arranged to form a series of spaced, straight lines  452  that extend inwardly from the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  400  towards the zig-zag line. In this embodiment, the lines  452  do not intersect the zig-zag line and do not extend to the outer peripheral edges of the theft deterrent label  400 . 
     The non-destructible section  414  comprises a printed alignment mark  436  in the form of a dashed line that extends substantially across the width of the non-destructible section  414 . The non-destructible section  418  comprises a printed alignment mark  438  in the form of a dashed line that extends substantially along the length of the third destructible section  418 . The alignment marks  446  and  448  are configured to be aligned with an opening or seam in merchandise packaging when the theft deterrent label  400  is adhered to the merchandise packaging at multiple locations and therefore, facilitate placement of the theft deterrent label  400  in use. 
       FIGS. 15 a  to 15 d    show the theft deterrent label  400  affixed to merchandise packaging in the form of a box  450  that is similar to box  150  shown in  FIGS. 3 to 5 . As shown in  FIG. 15 a   , the theft deterrent label  400  is affixed to the box  450 , adjacent its front left hand corner. As illustrated, the first destructible section  410  is affixed to the lid  460  of the box  450  with the anti-theft sensor trapped between the first destructible section  410  and the lid of the box  450 . The second destructible section  412  is folded over and affixed to the front  456   c  of the box  450  and the third destructible section  416  is folded over and affixed to the left side  456   a  of the box  450 . The non-destructible sections  414  and  418  extend across the opening or seam, between the lid  460  and front  456   c  of the box  450  and between the lid  460  and left side  456   c . In  FIG. 15 b   , the theft deterrent label  400  is affixed to the box  450  adjacent its front right hand corner. As illustrated, the first destructible section  410  is affixed to the right side  456   c  of the box  450  with the anti-theft sensor trapped between the first destructible section  410  and the right side. The second destructible section  412  is folded over and affixed to the front  456   a  of the box and the third destructible section  416  is folded over and affixed to the lid  460  of the box  450 . As will be appreciated, the configuration of the theft deterrent label  400  makes it particularly suitable for affixing adjacent corners of merchandise packaging as the second and third destructible sections are able to bridge merchandise packaging openings or seams at multiple locations. 
     The theft deterrent label  400  however does not need to be positioned adjacent a corner of the box. For example, in  FIG. 15 c   , the first and second destructible sections  410  and  412  are affixed to the lid  460  of the box  450  with the anti-theft sensor trapped between the first destructible section  410  and the lid. The third destructible section  416  is folded over and affixed to the front wall  456   a  of the box  450 . In  FIG. 15 d   , the first and third destructible sections  410  and  416  are affixed to the lid  460  of the box  450  with the anti-theft sensor trapped between the first destructible section  410  and the lid. The second destructible section  412  is folded over and affixed to the front wall  456   a  of the box  450 . 
     In the above embodiments, in the first, second and third destructible sections, the discrete perforations are arranged to form zig-zag lines. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that the discrete perforations may be arranged to form different shaped lines or different shapes and/or patterns. In fact, discrete perforations may be arranged to define short, straight, curved or angled lines, circles or half or quarter circles, triangles, “Y” shapes, etc. or combinations thereof that can be arranged in the desired patterns in first and second destructible sections. 
     For example,  FIGS. 16 a  to 16 f    show alternative discrete perforation arrangements that may be used to form weakness patterns in the first and second destructible sections. In  FIG. 16 a   , the discrete perforations are arranged in a manner similar to those in the theft deterrent label  200  and define a combination of saw-toothed (zig-zag) and straight lines. In  FIG. 16 b   , the discrete perforations are arranged to define discrete, spaced, straight and curved lines and special characters. In  FIG. 16 c   , the discrete perforations are arranged to define discrete, spaced, crisscrossed lines separated by parallel dashed lines. In  FIG. 16 d   , the discrete perforations are arranged to define discrete, spaced, “U”s separated by dashes. In  FIG. 16 e   , the discrete perforations are arranged to define discrete, spaced, circles or ovals. In  FIG. 16 f   , the discrete perforations are arranged to define discontinuous, spaced slanted lines. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that other line configurations and shapes may be employed. Also combinations of different line configurations and shapes may be used. 
     Although the interior regions within the first destructible sections are devoid of any weakness pattern, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the weakness patterns may extend further inwardly within the first destructible sections. Also, while the weakness patterns are described as being formed by arranging small discrete perforations such as punctures or holes in the desired patterns, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the weakness patterns may be defined by cuts formed in the destructible sections or by a combination of perforations and cuts. 
     The weakness patterns may be configured to allow the theft deterrent labels to tear into unidirectional strips when an attempt is made to peel the theft deterrent labels from the merchandise packaging thereby making it difficult and time consuming to peel off the theft deterrent label from the merchandise. 
     Although the thin film layer is described as being formed of polyester, in one or more embodiments, the theft deterrent labels may be formed of a material whose strength properties are orientation dependent. For instance, the material may be fracture-resistant in one direction and fracturable in another direction. Alternatively, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the theft deterrent labels may be formed of other suitable material. For example, other plastic films such as Tyvek may be employed. Alternatively, papers, coextruded composites and composites of paper, plastic film and woven fabric may be used. Similarly, although theft deterrent labels have been described as comprising a thin film layer formed of a single material, those of skill in the art will appreciate that different materials may be employed. For example, some sections of the theft deterrent labels may be formed of one type of material and other sections may be formed of another material or each section may be formed of a different material. In this case, different materials such as polystyrene, polypropylene, and acetate in addition to the materials previously described above, having the appropriate theft deterrent characteristics may be employed. The different materials may be adhered together adjacent their borders or laminated. 
     Although the theft deterrent labels have been described as carrying printed messages and/or indicia, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the theft deterrent labels may be devoid of printed messages and/or indicia. Likewise, the theft deterrent labels may be devoid of alignment marks. 
     The theft deterrent labels as described function as anti-theft devices by deterring unauthorized removal of anti-theft sensors. Furthermore, the theft deterrent labels inhibit unauthorized interchanging of the content of merchandise packaging. As will be appreciated, the theft deterrent labels may include other anti-theft deterrent components including visible warning messaging and/or indicia. 
     The theft deterrent labels are ideal for in-store labelling on products that are not well suited to source tagging. Although the theft deterrent labels have been described for use with anti-theft sensors, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the theft deterrent labels may be used in other applications. In essence, the theft deterrent labels can used in combination with any label, sensor or other device to be affixed to merchandise packaging. For example, the theft deterrent labels can be used to overlie RFID labels, authentication labels, or other structure etc. 
     As will be appreciated, the theft deterrent labels described above offer several advantages. The theft deterrent labels provide an excellent seal around their peripheral edges making them difficult to peel away from the merchandise packaging to which they are adhered. The theft deterrent labels fracture easily when a fingernail or other tool is used to attack their edges making removal of the theft deterrent labels time consuming as well as providing noticeable visual evidence of a tampering attempt. The theft deterrent labels serve as seals for merchandise packaging to prevent unauthorized product switching. Furthermore, the theft deterrent labels can be manufactured cost effectively and applied to merchandise packaging easily and safely. A benefit of the theft deterrent labels is that they impede shoplifting attempts by making the process of unauthorized access or removal difficult and time consuming. Consequently, the risk to a shoplifter of getting caught is increased, hence deterring the shoplifter from perpetuating the act of shoplifting. 
     In the examples above, the theft deterrent labels have been shown in use as being affixed to merchandise packaging in the form of boxes. The theft deterrent labels can of course be used with other packaging (e.g. cartons, parcels, folders, etc.) where it is desired to secure an anti-theft sensor or other structure and seal an opening or seam to the packaging. Depending on the nature of the packaging, the theft deterrent labels may be folded about an edge of the packaging or may simply extend across an opening to the packaging such as a flap, and lie in a horizontal plane. As will be appreciated by those of skill in the art, the theft deterrent labels may be used in virtually any environment where it is desired to protect a sensor, tag or label applied to an article. 
     Although the theft deterrent labels have been described as overlying anti-theft sensors, tags, labels or other structure, those of skill in the art will appreciate that the anti-theft sensors, tags, labels etc. may be incorporated into the theft deterrent labels. Thus, the theft deterrent labels may be sold stand-alone to overlie existing anti-theft sensors, tags, labels etc. or may be sold as a package with the anti-theft sensors, tags, labels etc. 
     Although embodiments have been described above and are shown in the accompanying drawings, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that variations and modifications may be made without departing from the scope defined by the appended claims, and the scope of the claims should be given the broadest interpretation consistent with the specification as a whole.