Patent Publication Number: US-2022237296-A1

Title: Authentication and notification heuristics

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application is a Divisional of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/488,356, filed on Jun. 4, 2012, entitled “Authentication And Notification Heuristics,” the content of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND 
     1. Technical Field 
     The present technology relates generally to network-based application distribution systems and more specifically to enhanced heuristics for scheduling updates and for batching notifications and authorization requests involving updates. 
     2. Introduction 
     Online commerce using is quickly becoming a ubiquitous part of the modern economy. Additionally, computing devices have become much more compact, mobile, and streamlined. Along with these advances, consumers have grown accustomed to media and software applications that are intelligently designed, easily accessible, and hassle-free to use. Likewise, consumers have come to expect that the online marketplace will be streamlined and user-friendly as well. 
     An example of an online marketplace is a network-based application distribution system. Such a market offers software application from software developers as free and paid downloads. Downloaded applications can also be updated by software developers from time to time to fix bugs, update settings, add additional content and features, etc. However, many known application updating and authorization protocols are non-intuitive, tedious, or otherwise not user-friendly. Indeed, system operators must balance practical requirements with the level of hassle-free design and user-friendliness that consumers expect. 
     For example, in an application distribution system, system operators must ensure that users are who they claim to be before making a purchase or updating an application; otherwise, a fraudulent user or a careless user (i.e. an infant mashing buttons) can make purchases, change settings, or otherwise wreak havoc to a user&#39;s account or device. Therefore, system administrators must put authorization checks in place; however, these requests for authorization should not be so frequent or burdensome so as to discourage use of an application distribution system. 
     Also, when operating an application distribution system, it is ideal that users apply software updates in a timely manner. For example, a quick application update with a patch to fix a minor problem can prevent the old software from crashing a device. Indeed, outdated applications on client devices having software bugs can impart very large maintenance costs to an application distribution system that supports those applications and their updates. Consequently, it is in the best interest of the administrators of the application distribution system that users of the applications update them as soon as updates and bug fixes become available to them. On the other hand, the same administrators do not want to pester their users fearing the negative consequences of overwhelming the user or seemingly monitoring user activity. 
     Likewise, while keeping the general preference for users to update applications when updates become available, it is in the best interest of the application distribution system to keep users&#39; cellular carrier costs low so as not to discourage their use of the system. 
     Many users do not bother to check their device for available updates and must be prompted; however, the users are oftentimes prompted to initiate updates at times which may cause them to either incur massive cellular charges, wait a very long time over a slow connection, or shift their attention away from a dangerous or business-sensitive task, i.e. while driving or while drafting an important email. Additionally, once a user is prompted to download and install updates and the user accepts, it is oftentimes the case that many of the updates require a user to accept the terms of a notification, chose update features, and authorize the installation of the updates. When a large number of updates are being installed at one time, these notifications and requests for authorization can become tedious. 
     SUMMARY 
     Additional features and advantages of the disclosure will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or can be learned by practice of the herein disclosed principles. The features and advantages of the disclosure can be realized and obtained by means of the instruments and combinations particularly pointed out in the appended claims. These and other features of the disclosure will become more fully apparent from the following description and appended claims, or can be learned by practice of the principles set forth herein. 
     The present technology provides systems, computer-readable media, devices and methods for server-based user authentication, scheduling when a user receives update notifications, and batching notifications together. These and other features of the present technology provide users with a less tedious application update experience by streamlining the process and delivering the update notifications and prompts at a time when the users can easily dispatch the updates. 
     Some embodiments of the present technology involve server-side authentication of user accounts by using multiple authentication tokens. Some embodiments of the present technology involve a server sending users updates for applications installed on their devices when those updates become available. Some other embodiments involve sending the user an update statement that an update is available for download. Some embodiments of the present technology involve batching and sending notifications or requests for authentications that are required for each application update that is currently ready for download. 
     Some embodiments of the present technology involve only prompting users that updates are available upon determining that a threshold amount of updates are available or by determining that a requisite amount of time has passed with an update pending. Some embodiments of the present technology involve prompting a user when the threshold is reached. Some embodiments involve waiting to prompt users that updates are available until the client device becomes connected to an adequately efficient network, or a network whose use does not result in financial obligations to the user. 
     In response to users accepting the terms of the batched notifications and adequately authenticating themselves, some embodiments of the present technology involve downloading updates only when network conditions meet system or user requirements. Some embodiments of the present technology involve only downloading updates upon a device being connected to a Wi-Fi network. Some embodiments of the present technology involve a tiered scheme of network checks that attempts to optimize update download efficiency. 
     Some embodiments of the present technology involve enforcing situational settings that avoid update prompts from interrupting user&#39;s current tasks or from distracting a user while performing certain tasks, i.e. driving. Some embodiments of the present technology involve a user profile and an interface for setting user preferences and situational settings. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       In order to describe the manner in which the above-recited and other advantages and features of the disclosure can be obtained, a more particular description of the principles briefly described above will be rendered by reference to specific embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. Understanding that these drawings depict only exemplary embodiments of the disclosure and are not therefore to be considered to be limiting of its scope, the principles herein are described and explained with additional specificity and detail through the use of the accompanying drawings in which: 
         FIG. 1  is a front view of an electronic device in accordance with some embodiments of present technology; 
         FIG. 2  illustrates an exemplary application distribution system according to some embodiments of present technology; 
         FIG. 3  illustrates an exemplary method of server-side processing of client requests in an application distribution system according to some embodiments of the present technology; 
         FIG. 4  illustrates an exemplary method of determining how and when to prompt a user that application updates are pending and how to carry out the update process according to some embodiments of the present technology; 
         FIG. 5  illustrates a spec method for checking network conditions and enforcing network preferences according to some embodiments of the present technology; and 
         FIG. 6  illustrates an exemplary method for batching notifications relating to application updates and requests for authorizations to download and install application updates according to some embodiments of the present technology. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     Various embodiments of the disclosure are discussed in detail below. While specific implementations are discussed, it should be understood that this is done for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other components and configurations may be used without parting from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. The present disclosure addresses the need in the art for a system for improving the efficiency and convenience of updating software onto a computing device by using improved notification, prompting and authorization heuristics. 
     A brief introductory description of a basic general purpose system or computing device, which can be employed to practice the concepts is illustrated in  FIG. 1 . A more detailed description of how the pre-installed software is associated with a user account will follow, including several variations as the various embodiments are set forth. The disclosure now turns to  FIG. 1 . 
     With reference to  FIG. 1 , an exemplary system  100  includes a general-purpose computing device  100 , including a processing unit (CPU or processor)  120  and a system bus  110  that couples various system components including the system memory  130  such as read only memory (ROM)  140  and random access memory (RAM)  150  to the processor  120 . The system  100  can include a cache  122  of high speed memory connected directly with, in close proximity to, or integrated as part of the processor  120 . The system  100  copies data from the memory  130  and/or the storage device  160  to the cache  122  for quick access by the processor  120 . In this way, the cache provides a performance boost that avoids processor  120  delays while waiting for data. These and other modules can control or be configured to control the processor  120  to perform various actions. Other system memory  130  may be available for use as well. The memory  130  can include multiple different types of memory with different performance characteristics. It can be appreciated that the disclosure may operate on a computing device  100  with more than one processor  120  or on a group or cluster of computing devices networked together to provide greater processing capability. The processor  120  can include any general purpose processor and a hardware module or software module, such as module  1   162 , module  2   164 , and module  3   166  stored in storage device  160 , configured to control the processor  120  as well as a special-purpose processor where software instructions are incorporated into the actual processor design. The processor  120  may essentially be a completely self-contained computing system, containing multiple cores or processors, a bus, memory controller, cache, etc. A multi-core processor may be symmetric or asymmetric. 
     The system bus  110  may be any of several types of bus structures including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, and a local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. A basic input/output (BIOS) stored in ROM  140  or the like, may provide the basic routine that helps to transfer information between elements within the computing device  100 , such as during start-up. The computing device  100  further includes storage devices  160  such as a hard disk drive, a magnetic disk drive, an optical disk drive, tape drive or the like. The storage device  160  can include software modules  162 ,  164 ,  166  for controlling the processor  120 . Other hardware or software modules are contemplated. The storage device  160  is connected to the system bus  110  by a drive interface. The drives and the associated computer readable storage media provide nonvolatile storage of computer readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for the computing device  100 . In one aspect, a hardware module that performs a particular function includes the software component stored in a non-transitory computer-readable medium in connection with the necessary hardware components, such as the processor  120 , bus  110 , display  170 , and so forth, to carry out the function. The basic components are known to those of skill in the art and appropriate variations are contemplated depending on the type of device, such as whether the device  100  is a small, handheld computing device, a desktop computer, or a computer server. 
     Although the exemplary embodiment described herein employs the hard disk  160 , it should be appreciated by those skilled in the art that other types of computer readable media which can store data that are accessible by a computer, such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital versatile disks, cartridges, random access memories (RAMs)  150 , read only memory (ROM)  140 , a cable or wireless signal containing a bit stream and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment. Non-transitory computer-readable storage media expressly exclude media such as energy, carrier signals, electromagnetic waves, and signals per se. 
     To enable user interaction with the computing device  100 , an input device  190  represents any number of input mechanisms, such as a microphone for speech, a touch-sensitive screen for gesture or graphical input, keyboard, mouse, motion input, speech and so forth. An output device  170  can also be one or more of a number of output mechanisms known to those of skill in the art. In some instances, multimodal systems enable a user to provide multiple types of input to communicate with the computing device  100 . The communications interface  180  generally governs and manages the user input and system output. There is no restriction on operating on any particular hardware arrangement and therefore the basic features here may easily be substituted for improved hardware or firmware arrangements as they are developed. 
     For clarity of explanation, the illustrative system embodiment is presented as including individual functional blocks including functional blocks labeled as a “processor” or processor  120 . The functions these blocks represent may be provided through the use of either shared or dedicated hardware, including, but not limited to, hardware capable of executing software and hardware, such as a processor  120 , that is purpose-built to operate as an equivalent to software executing on a general purpose processor. For example, the functions of one or more processors presented in  FIG. 1  may be provided by a single shared processor or multiple processors. (Use of the term “processor” should not be construed to refer exclusively to hardware capable of executing software.) Illustrative embodiments may include microprocessor and/or digital signal processor (DSP) hardware, read-only memory (ROM)  140  for storing software performing the operations discussed below, and random access memory (RAM)  150  for storing results. Very large scale integration (VLSI) hardware embodiments, as well as custom VLSI circuitry in combination with a general purpose DSP circuit, may also be provided. 
     The logical operations of the various embodiments are implemented as: (1) a sequence of computer implemented steps, operations, or procedures running on a programmable circuit within a general use computer, (2) a sequence of computer implemented steps, operations, or procedures running on a specific-use programmable circuit; and/or (3) interconnected machine modules or program engines within the programmable circuits. The system  100  shown in  FIG. 1  can practice all or part of the recited methods, can be a part of the recited systems, and/or can operate according to instructions in the recited non-transitory computer-readable storage media. Such logical operations can be implemented as modules configured to control the processor  120  to perform particular functions according to the programming of the module. For example,  FIG. 1  illustrates three modules Mod 1   162 , Mod 2   164  and Mod 3   166  which are modules configured to control the processor  120 . These modules may be stored on the storage device  160  and loaded into RAM  150  or memory  130  at runtime or may be stored as would be known in the art in other computer-readable memory locations. 
     Having disclosed some components of a computing system, the disclosure now returns to a discussion of improving users&#39; experiences with authenticating identity and receiving notifications and prompts for updating applications that are offered to a user account in an online application distribution store or market for installation on a computing device such as a personal computer, laptop, game console, smart phone, mobile phone, or tablet PC. The approaches set forth herein can improve the efficiency and convenience of updating software onto a computing device by using improved notification, prompting and authorization heuristics. First, a description of an exemplary application distribution system is given. 
       FIG. 2  illustrates an exemplary application distribution system. In this example, distribution system  200  includes distribution center  210 , applications database  220 , the Internet  250 , and computing devices  260 ,  270 , and  280 . It will be appreciated that these devices can be any computing device known in the art, whether a desktop computer, laptop, smart phone, tablet, etc. Further, these devices may be portable or in a fixed location. Together, distribution center  210 , applications database  220 , and configurations server can represent server side  240  of a client-server model. Similarly, computing devices  260 ,  270 , and  280  can represent client side  290  of the client-server model. It should be appreciated that references to a method being performed either server-side or client-side refers to devices on the server-side and client-side, respectively, that substantially perform these methods. 
     The broad overview of distribution system  200  includes server side  240  communicating with client side  290  via the Internet  250 . As an example, the server side  240  can be represented to the user as an online store for the sale and distribution of applications. A device from client side  290  can communicate with the online store using an application management computer program stored on the device. In other examples, the Internet  250  can be replaced with other communication networks such as computer networks, telephone networks, Ethernet, local area networks, wired networks, wireless networks, and others. 
     Computing device  260  includes applications  261 . Applications  261  can include applications that were purchased from distribution center  210  by a user of computing device  260 . To purchase desired applications from distribution center  210 , a user logs into user account. Logging into a user account can involve one or more requests for user authentication. Once logged in, the user may select a desired application to purchase. When the user agrees to pay the price of the application, the user&#39;s payment information is used to complete the transaction. Once the transaction is completed, the desired application is associated with user account, thus allowing the user to download the desired application and also updates of the desired application. Applications associated with user account can also be updated or re-downloaded onto other devices that are associated with user account. In this example, computing device  260 , computing device  270 , and computing device  280  are all associated with user account and thus, are configured to receive updates and re-downloads of all applications  281  that have been associated with user account. Moreover, computing device  280  can communicate with computing device  270  to transfer digital data and applications between the two devices. In one example, computing device  280  may be configured to be a central repository containing all applications  281  associated with user account that transfers selected applications to computing device  280 , In this specification, the term “application” refers to a copy of a software program or application provided by a software provider. In other examples, other digital products besides software applications and software programs (such as system software, enterprise software, multimedia files, video files, audio files, and image files) on a computing device can also be associated with user account and distributed/re-distributed by distribution center  210 . 
     Distribution center  210 , which is coupled to applications database  220 , is configured to sell, deliver, and maintain applications from applications database  220 . Applications database  220  can be configured to store some or all of the applications available for distribution from server side  240 . The applications can be sold, updated, and delivered, i.e. transmitted, to a device in client side  290  through the Internet  250 . As such, distribution center  210  represents an online store for applications. For example, applications database  220  can receive a request from distribution center  210  for an application and in response to the request, transmits the requested application to distribution center  210 , which subsequently transmits the application to the requesting device. The applications requested may be applications available for purchase or applications previously associated with a user account, i.e. previously purchased or pre-installed applications that have been adopted. In other examples, applications database  220  can directly transmit the requested application to the requesting device. 
     Users are sometimes prompted with request for authentication before gaining the ability to purchase new media items or applications, change account information, or update existing applications. Accordingly, some embodiments of the present technology involve improved heuristics for authenticating users. 
     Server-Based Authentication Enforcement 
     Some embodiments of the present technology involve a server-based approach for authenticating users. Referring again to  FIG. 2 , some embodiments of the present technology involve an authentication module  299  on the server-side  240  for authenticating users. Authentication on the server side of a distribution system  200  can be preferred in some cases. For example, in some embodiments of the present technology, server-side authentication is preferred over client-side authentication when the client device is a mobile device because a mobile device is open to increased security risks. Additionally, server-driven authorization is preferred due to its flexibility as the server&#39;s policies can be changed any time and modulated on a per country or per account basis. For example, server policy can be changed to adapt to emerging fraud patterns. 
     In some embodiments, when a user makes a purchase request from the distribution center  210 , the authentication module  299  requires that the user enter identification information as well as a password. Upon the receipt of the appropriate authentication information, the distribution center  210  obtains access to the requested item from the applications database  220  and delivers the item to the user. Additionally, the authentication module  299  delivers one or more security tokens to the user, wherein the security tokens serve to provide authentication for future transactions with the distribution center  210 . 
     In some embodiments of the present technology, the authentication module  299  can issue both a strong token to the user and a weak token to the user. In some embodiments of the present technology, a strong token allows a user to make sensitive changes, i.e. financial purchases with the distribution center  210  or changes to user buffing information in a user account without the user needing to provide authentication details again. Also, the strong token has a short expiration period, i.e. fifteen minutes. Verification of the weak token allows the user to perform tasks without the user needing to provide authentication details again, but does not allow the user to make any additional requests that would expose the user to financial liability or that would after his profile. The weak token can provide authorization to perform some interaction with the distribution system when the interaction only requires general, non-sensitive data. For example, in some embodiments of the present technology, a weak token can provide authorization to update an application—assuming the update is free and does not otherwise involve sensitive information or additional user prerequisites, i.e. age requirement. In some embodiments, the weak token can have a longer expiration period, i.e. six months; can be used for any non-financial action with the distribution center  210 ; and can be renewed upon each new, strong token-authenticated financial transaction. Accordingly, in these embodiments, the authentication module  299  requests validation of either the strong token or weak token from the client side  290  depending on the type of transaction that is subsequently requested. Likewise, in some embodiments, an administrator can change the types of events that require a strong or weak token. 
       FIG. 3  illustrates an exemplary method  300  of server-based processing of client requests in an application distribution system according to some embodiments of the present technology. The method  300  of  FIG. 3  begins with receiving a purchase request  301 , or a free download request, from a user&#39;s computing device. A purchase request  301  results in a prompt from the server-side, prompting the user with a request to enter authentication information  302 . A decision block  303  decides if the authentication information is correctly entered and if so, sending  399  the user the requested application along with two security tokens: a weak token and a strong token. In some embodiments, if the authentication information is entered incorrectly, the method  300  begins over as though a request is being made again. 
     Next, a request is made by the user through their computing device that involves sensitive information  304 , such as financial information or private user data. In the method  300  of  FIG. 3 , the server-side processes the request  308  only if the strong token has not expired  306 . Otherwise, the user must re-authenticate. Similarly, a request is made on a user&#39;s computing device that involves general information  305 , such as merely confirming an update. In the method  300  of  FIG. 3 , the server-side processes this request  307  if the weak token has not expired  309 . Otherwise, the user must re-authenticate. 
     According to the method  300  of  FIG. 3 , the server in the application distribution system can enforce purchase requests, update authentications, etc. 
     Additionally, a number of heuristics are available for making the purchase and update of applications more user-friendly while maintaining a threshold level of security. For example, in some embodiments of the present technology, the authentication module  299  can relax authentication requirements for those users who utilize a self-imposed passcode for deterring unauthorized use of a device. In some aspects of this embodiment, the computing device or server-side device can be programmed by default to utilize relaxed authentication requirements for users that have a passcode needed before operating the device. In one example, the computing device might not prompt a user for a password before making a purchase, or update of an application or editing a user account. In some aspects, a user can proactively change security settings in a computing device to indicate that he is satisfied with a passkey entry replacing the more secure authentication verifications to result in relaxed authentication requirements. 
     In some embodiments of the present technology, a mobile device equipped with geo-location capabilities can inform the authentication module  299  that the user is located in a safe environment, i.e. the user&#39;s home. Likewise, a client device can sense that a user is at home by detecting a home Wi-Fi address. In these examples, the client device can inform the authentication module  299  that the user is willing to relax authentication requirements while in that, relatively, secure location. 
     Notification Scheduling 
     As explained above, applications on a client device having software bugs can impart very large maintenance costs to an application distribution system that supports those applications and their updates. Consequently, it is in the best interest of the administrators of the application distribution system that users of the applications update them as soon as bug fixes become available to them. On the other hand, the same administrators do not want to pester their users fearing the negative consequences of seeming like Big Brother. Accordingly, the present technology provides solutions for informing users that updates and new content is available for their applications in a way that is not intrusive, that will not waste resources, and that will not require a user to interact with a device when they are busy with other important tasks or while performing actions that require the users&#39; steadfast attention. 
     According to some embodiments of the present technology and referring again to  FIG. 2 , whenever a user on the client side  290  interacts with the distribution center  210 , the distribution center  210  sends back parameters that determine an expiration date to the client device, i.e. the computing device  280 . When the duration of the object expires, the client device automatically sends a request to the distribution center  210  requesting a status relating to whether one or more applications installed on the client device have available updates. In some other embodiments of the present technology, each time an application from the applications database  220  receives an update, the distribution center  210  pushes a notification to the client device on the client side. In any event, as explained above, many users do not bother to check their device for available updates. Accordingly, some embodiments of the present technology involve heuristics for prompting a user that updates are available and for executing the updates to completion. 
       FIG. 4  illustrates an exemplary method  400  of determining how and when to prompt a user that application updates are pending and how to carry out the update process according to some embodiments of the present technology. 
     The method  400  shown in  FIG. 4  begins with a client device receiving one or more update statements  401  from the server-side noting that an update is available on the server-side of an application distribution system. In some embodiments, a user is not notified of a newly received statement, but can proactively seek out a statement by querying the application distribution system as to whether a statement has been received for any applications on the client&#39;s computing device. 
     The client device receives update statements by pulling from an application distribution system, an application distribution system pushing the statements to the client device, or in a hybrid push-pull scenario. In some embodiments of the present technology, an icon receives a badge when an update statement is available. One example of this badge can be found on various mobile and tablet devices made by Apple Inc. For example, an iPhone™ having substantially square icons representing applications can include a small circular badge place in one corner. One example of this badge of this type being used for a different purpose can be seen on the phone application wherein a small badge lists a number that corresponds to a number of notifications from that application to a user. Also, the badge can take the shape of a sash that spans across the corner of an application icon and can have text located therein to convey the status of the update. 
     In some embodiments, the badge can be displayed over each application that has an update available. In some embodiments, a cumulative badge can be displayed over an application specific for managing app updates such as the App Store App SM  on Apple Inc&#39;s iPhone®. 
     When a new update statement is received, the method  400  checks to see whether the update has been blacklisted  402 . Various reasons might cause an update to be blacklisted that will be apparent to those with ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure; however, in some embodiments, as explained below, an update is blacklisted if a user proactively tells the device never to apply the update, or to not apply an update for this version, or for a period of time. 
     As explained above, a developer of an application distribution system does not want to pester the clients of the application distribution system. Accordingly, in some embodiments of the present technology, the application distribution system only prompts clients when a certain threshold of applications available for update is reached. In some embodiments, prompts from the application distribution system comprise a dialog box or other menu that requires a user&#39;s reply before proceeding. Therefore, the method  400  continues by checking whether or not a threshold of update statements has been reached  403 . 
     In some embodiments of the present technology, the threshold is reached when requisite number of updates is available. In some other embodiments, the threshold is reached when a requisite percentage of the total number of applications currently installed on the computing device has an update available. In some other embodiments, the threshold is reached when a requisite amount of time has passed, i.e. a certain number of days, from when the update notification was received. In some embodiments, the threshold is reached when a combination of these circumstances is present. For example, in some embodiments, a user is notified when at least five update notifications have been available for over thirty days. Although specific example embodiments are disclosed herein, it will be readily apparent to those with ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that any update percentages, amounts, number of days, etc. can be used as thresholds, as well as various other metrics. 
     Additionally, as explained above, the application distribution system has an interest in keeping the cellular carrier costs associated with data usage by the client devices to a minimum to prevent users avoiding updates due to incurred costs. Accordingly, some embodiments of the present technology involve making a decision of whether or not to prompt a user about updates depending on whether the client device is presently connected to a Wi-Fi network. Similarly, the application distribution system has an interest in keeping update download time short to prevent users from skipping updates so they can enjoy other device features without having to wait. Consequently, some embodiments of the present technology involve making a decision whether or not to prompt a user about the presence of updates depending on network speed—whether it is Wi-Fi vs. cellular or X-generation cellular vs. Y-generation cellular. Accordingly, if a threshold has been reached in step  402 , the method  400  continues with checking network conditions and network preference settings  404 . 
     It will be apparent to those with ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that a wide variety of methods exist for checking network conditions and enforcing network preferences.  FIG. 5  illustrates a specific method  500  for checking network conditions and enforcing network preferences according to some embodiments of the present technology. The method  500  involves a tiered system of network checks that attempts to optimize update download efficiency. Indeed, the settings and preferences relating to the network checks can be programmed by a system administrator, a user, or combinations thereof. In some embodiments of the present technology, the server learns of the network state by querying the client&#39;s computing device. 
     First, before downloading and installing application updates on a client device, the system determines whether the client device is currently connected to a Wi-Fi network  501 . If so, the system optionally checks if the device is currently connected to a power source  502 . For example, some updates and system backup procedures can be very lengthy and can be disrupted if not allowed to completely finish. Accordingly, in some embodiments, the client device may need to be plugged in to ensure that the battery life is not depleted during an update or backup. In some other embodiments, a user can indicate that downloads only occur when the client&#39;s computing device is deemed idle for a requisite time. In some embodiments, system settings are configured such that a device will consider itself idle under certain conditions, i.e. when the device is plugged in at nighttime and is not interacted with for over one hour. The method  500  then proceeds  503  to initiate the update. 
     Again, the system determines whether the client device is currently connected to a Wi-Fi network  501 . If the client device is not connected to Wi-Fi, the method waits  504  and iteratively checks whether a threshold period of ti has passed  505 . Upon reaching a threshold period of time, the system determines whether the download size of an update (or other network activity) would involve requiring a client device to expend cellular network time that would bring the user&#39;s plan over a carrier-imposed data limit  506 . Indeed, exceeding data limits would result in financial liability and, most likely, reduced performance. In some embodiments of the present technology, if the download system settings require that a data limit is not exceeded, the method  500  then waits until Wi-Fi is detected before initiating a download. 
     In some embodiments of the present technology, updates can be determined to be important by a server administrator or if the metadata associated with the update indicates it is important for security reasons. In these embodiments, the server can push the update through, despite the client&#39;s computing device not being connected to Wi-Fi, based on an administrator assuming that users would rather expend some data airtime in order to install an important update. Likewise, the heuristic that determines when to forego the Wi-Fi requirement can allow for dynamic time and context thresholds based on another factor such as how many applications have updates pending. 
     If a data limit ill not be exceeded (or if system settings permit exceeded limits), the system determines whether a first network type, i.e. a 4 th    Generation Cellular  network, is detected  507 . If so, the method  500  proceeds to optional step  502  and goes forward with the update process. If not, the method  500  performs a process of successive network checks  510 ,  513 ,  516 ; waiting periods  508 ,  511 ,  514 ; and waiting period threshold checks  509 ,  512 ,  515  until a network is detected that can perform the update process consistent with the system settings. 
     Referring again to  FIG. 4 , the method  400  also optionally determines whether or not one or more situational conditions are present which conflict with a user&#39;s situational settings  499 . In some embodiments, situational settings can include not prompting a user to update one or more applications while driving. In some embodiments, the client&#39;s computing device infers that a user is driving by triangulating position information supplied by a geo-location module or OPS device. In some embodiments of the present technology, a client device infers that a user is driving if it rapidly detects a series of Wi-Fi networks. In some embodiments of the present technology, a client device infers that a user is driving if it is connected to a car Bluetooth™ speaker or plugged in to a car kit with an recognized connector type. In some embodiments, situational settings can include not prompting a user to update one or more applications while composing an email. In some embodiments, situational settings can include not prompting a user to update one or more applications while playing a game. If a user has not imposed situational settings or f a prohibited situation does not occur, the method  400  continues with prompting a user  405  to update his applications. 
     In some embodiments of the present technology, prompting a user  406  involves presenting a dialog box with three options for responding to the question of whether to update the applications now: “Yes,” “Not Now,” or “Never.” 
     If a user responds to the dialog box with “Never,” the method  400  checks  407  whether or not one or more of the updates are critical. An example of a critical update is an update to the operating system or an essential security patch. If an update is critical, the method  400  continues with presenting  408  the user with another dialog box informing the user why the update cannot be ignored. If the updates are not critical, the updates are blacklisted  409  and the method ends  490 . 
     If, in response to the method  400  prompting a user  406 , the user responds with “Wait,” the method  400  waits  410  a certain amount of time before re-checking network conditions, situational setting, and re-prompting the user. Finally, if the user responds with “Yes,” the method  400  proceeds. Optionally, the method  400  involves determining whether a device is plugged in  498  before proceeding with an update. 
     Once the update is initiated  411 , the method  400  monitors the update progress and determines if the update experiences an interruption  412 . If the update does not, the update finishes and the method  400  ends. If the update experiences an interruption, the update process is paused  413  and network conditions are re-checked, situational setting are re-checked, and the user is again prompted. 
       FIG. 4  illustrates an exemplary method  400  for the purpose of illustration only. In some other embodiments, methods automatically download and install all free updates and only perform a process of notification scheduling for paid updates. 
     In some embodiments of the present technology, a user pre-pays for a series of updates and the updates are then automatically downloaded and installed. According to these embodiments, new episodes that become available for subscriptions to periodicals, i.e. magazines, newspapers, podcasts, etc, will not cause a user prompt. 
     In some embodiments, the various threshold, network, and situational concerns vary depending on how often a user uses a particular application or how often an entire user base uses a particular application. In some embodiments of the present technology, a user sets preferences on a first device and then all devices tied to that user&#39;s account enforces those settings. Likewise, if multiple accounts use a single device, the device can enforce multiple settings. In some other embodiments, a different set of preferences are required for a system backup than those required for an application update. Those with ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure will readily appreciate that many other methods are contemplated for scheduling notifications and carrying out update downloads and installations. 
     Also as explained above, once a user is prompted to download and install updates and the user accepts it is oftentimes the case that many of the updates require a user to accept the terms of a notification, chose update features, and authorize the installation of the updates. When a large number of updates are being installed at one time, these notifications and requests for authorization can become tedious. Accordingly, some embodiments of the present technology involve batching notifications and requests for authorization, and avoiding duplicates thereof. 
     Batching Notification and Authorization Requests 
     As discussed above, it is in the best interest of the application distribution system to avoid annoying its users with tedious request for feedback. Additionally, the present technology avoids a first download ending without a user noticing and a subsequent download sitting idle while the system waits for a user&#39;s acquiescence to a notification. 
     Consequently, some embodiments of the present technology involve batching notifications relating to application updates and requests for authorizations to download and install application updates. Examples of notifications and requests for authorization include notifications relating to an application using a lot of data, requests for a user to verify that he is above a certain age, requests for a system password, requests for an application password, requests for verification that an application will not be used while driving, etc. 
       FIG. 6  illustrates an exemplary method  600  for batching notifications relating to application updates and requests for authorizations to download and install application updates according to some embodiments of the present technology. First, as explained above, some embodiments of the present technology involve prompting a user when a plurality of updates are available  601 . Upon receiving permission from the user to initiate the update process  602 , the server locates all of the uploads from an application database and extracts all of the dialog prompts, notifications, authorization requests, password requests, etc. from the group of updates  603 . Next, the system batches the prompts together  604  serially and avoids duplicative requests. Duplicative requests can be fairly common. For example, an application distribution system might require that some applications obtain positive affirmation from the user that the user is of an age of majority, i.e. 17+. If the plurality of updates contains multiple updates for application requiring a user to be of an age of majority, the method truncates duplicative dialog boxes, thereby saving the user time and annoyance. 
     Next, the batch of requests for user feedback is serially presented to the user  605  and the user responds in turn. In some embodiments, the answers to the requests for feedback are recorded on a server side of an application distribution system  606  and the download process proceeds  607  according to the user&#39;s answers. Finally, the updates are installed  608 . 
     This method  600  avoids a fragmented update process as follows: Suppose the requests for feedback are presented periodically after each individual application update finishes, rather than serially before a group of updates begin. If a user is distracted from the update process after the first individual application update finishes, he might return to find that the entire process has been stalled while the system waits for him to answer a request for feedback. On the other hand, since the method  600  asks for all user input serially in the beginning of the process  605 , the system does not wait for additional feedback and the update process can complete without further user interaction being required. 
     Some other embodiments of the present technology involve, batching notifications relating to application updates and requests for authorizations to download and install application updates across multiple devices and across multiple accounts. 
     Accordingly, although the invention has been described in detail with reference to particular preferred embodiments, persons possessing ordinary skill in the art to which this invention pertains will appreciate that various modifications and enhancements may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claims that follow.