Patent Publication Number: US-2022213327-A1

Title: Waterless planographic printing plate dyeing method and planographic printing dye

Description:
TECHNICAL FIELD 
     The present invention relates to a dyeing method for a waterless offset lithographic printing plate and a dyeing solution for a lithographic printing plate. 
     BACKGROUND ART 
     For a lithographic printing plate, the image area is normally dyed during or after development perform by using an automatic developing machine or the like in order to determine the end point of development for the purpose of improving plate inspection characteristics. In a general method used for such dyeing, only the image area is dyed by spraying a dyeing solution containing a dye or immersing the plate in a dyeing solution. 
     A normal dyeing solution uses at least one selected from basic dyes, disperse dyes, and acidic dyes dissolved or dispersed in a single-component solvent or a mixed solvent containing one or a plurality selected from water, alcohols, ketones, and ethers. Furthermore, organic acids, inorganic acids, amines, surface active agents, dyeing aids, or the like may be added in order to improve the dyeability. 
     However, many of such dyeing solutions have the disadvantage that, when used for bulk processing using an automatic developing machine etc., the dyeing density in the image area may deteriorate due to a decrease in dye concentration in the dyeing solution caused by sludge mainly composed of the dye and due to a lowered efficiency in pumping of the dyeing solution caused by foaming in the tank. 
     To solve this problem, Patent document 1 proposes to dye the image area in a waterless offset lithographic printing plate by using a dyeing solution that contains an anionic surface active agent of a branched structure having 3 to 30 carbon atoms in order to control the generation of sludge and the occurrence of foaming to prevent a decrease in dye concentration (see Patent document 1). 
     Furthermore, Patent document 2 proposes the inclusion of one or more of dipropylene glycol monoalkyl ethers and tripropylene glycol monoalkyl ethers in addition to the anionic surface active agent of a branched structure having 3 to 30 carbon atoms in an attempt to further improve the foaming prevention effect while suppressing the generation of sludge (see Patent document 2). 
     PRIOR ART DOCUMENTS 
     Patent Documents 
     Patent document 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No. HEI 9-34132 
     Patent document 2: Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No. 2004-233610 
     SUMMARY OF INVENTION 
     Problems to be Solved by the Invention 
     However, such a dyeing solution containing an anionic surface active agent containing a branched structure having 3 to 30 carbon atoms as described in Patent Document 1 has the disadvantage that, although the lithographic printing plate as a whole does not suffer a significant decrease in dye concentration, imperfect dyeing can occur in some parts of the lithographic printing plate, leading to the problem of so-called “dyeing unevenness”, i.e., failure in displaying correct image area ratios in some portions. In addition, sludge composed mainly of the dye may occur if a water-insoluble organic solvent is contained. 
     Besides, the problem of dyeing unevenness is still likely to occur even when using a dyeing solution containing one or more of dipropylene glycol monoalkyl ethers and tripropylene glycol monoalkyl ethers in addition to an anionic surface active agent of a branched structure having 3 to 30 carbon atoms as described in Patent document 2. 
     When a waterless offset lithographic printing plate is dyed with a dyeing solution as described in Patent Document 1 or 2, furthermore, there can occur the disadvantage that the dyeing solution does not sufficiently permeate the waterless offset lithographic printing plate, resulting in poor plate inspection characteristics. 
     Under such circumstances, there is increased demand for a dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates and a dyeing method for waterless offset lithographic printing plates that show stable plate inspection characteristics with little decrease in dye concentration and less dyeing unevenness even when used for bulk plate processing. 
     Means of Solving the Problems 
     Thus, a first embodiment of the present invention provides a dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates for use to dye an image area formed on a lithographic printing plate precursor, comprising (a) a dye, (b) an anionic surface active agent as represented by the general formula (1) given below, and (c) an organic solvent containing at least one selected from ethers and alcohols (hereinafter occasionally referred to as (c) an organic solvent). 
       R 1 —X  (1)
 
     (In the formula, R 1  represents a linear alkyl group having 3 to 30 carbon atoms or a linear alkenyl group having 3 to 30 carbon atoms, and X represents SO 3 Na, SO 3 K, COONa, COONH 4 , or COOK.) 
     In addition, a second embodiment of the present invention provides a dyeing method for a waterless offset lithographic printing plate designed to dye an image area formed on the waterless offset lithographic printing plate with a dyeing solution containing an organic solvent, the image area containing a polymer compound and the SP value of the organic solvent, denoted by α, and the SP value of the polymer compound, denoted by β, holding the following relation: |β−α|&lt;5. 
     Advantageous Effects of the Invention 
     The first embodiment of the present invention can provide a dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates that shows stable plate inspection characteristics with little decrease in dye concentration and less dyeing unevenness even when used for bulk plate processing. Furthermore, the second embodiment of the present invention can provide a dyeing method for waterless offset lithographic printing plates that shows stable plate inspection characteristics with little decrease in dye concentration and less dyeing unevenness even when used for bulk plate processing. 
    
    
     DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution for Lithographic Printing Plates According to the First Embodiment&gt; 
     The dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates according to the first embodiment of the present invention is described below. 
     The dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates according to the first embodiment of the present invention is designed to dye an image area formed on a lithographic printing plate precursor by light exposure and development and it serves to allow the lithographic printing plate to have improved plate inspection characteristics realized by virtue of a difference between the reflection density of the non-image area and the reflection density of the image area (i.e., dye concentration). 
     The dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates according to the present invention contains (a) a dye. Examples of (a) the dye include basic dyes, acidic dyes, direct dyes, disperse dyes, and reactive dyes, which may be used singly or as a combination of two or more thereof. 
     Of these examples of (a) the dye, basic dyes are preferred because they can be adsorbed strongly to the image area to achieve a high dye concentration. Examples of the basic dyes include triphenyl methane based basic dyes such as Methyl Violet, Ethyl Violet, Basic Fuchsin, Basic Red 9, Malachite Green Oxalate, Brilliant Green, Victoria Blue B, Crystal Violet, Basic Green 1, Basic Blue 1, Basic Blue 7, and Basic Blue 20; xanthene based basic dyes such as Rhodamine 6G, Rhodamine B, Rhodamine 123, and Rhodamine 19; diphenyl methane based basic dyes such as auramine; azine based basic dyes such as safranine; oxazine based basic dyes such as Basic Blue 3; methine based basic dyes such as Basic Yellow 28, Basic Red 13, and Basic Violet 7; azo based basic dyes such as Basic Orange 2 and Basic Brown 1; and thiazine based dyes such as Basic Blue 17, Basic Blue 24, and Methylene Blue. Of these, particularly preferred are triphenyl methane based basic dyes such as Methyl Violet, Ethyl Violet, Basic Fuchsin, Basic Red 9, Victoria Blue B, Crystal Violet, Basic Blue 1, Basic Blue 7, and Basic Blue 20. 
     In particular, it is preferable for (a) the dye in use to have a maximum absorption wavelength (λ max ) in the wavelength range of 400 to 600 nm. Since many lithographic printing plates have greenish colors, the use of such a dye serves effectively to allow the image area to have a higher dye concentration by virtue of complementary color relations. Thus, this is preferable because it is possible to efficiently increase the dye concentration of the image area and achieve better plate inspection characteristics. 
     In addition, it is preferable for such (a) a dye to account for 0.05 mass % or more of the dye solution. If the content of the dye is 0.05 mass % or more, it is preferable because it serves to achieve a sufficiently large difference between the reflection density of the non-image area and the reflection density of the image area to ensure improved plate inspection characteristics. It is more preferable for the dye to account for 0.10 mass % or more of the dyeing solution. On the other hand, it is preferable for the dye to account for 5.00 mass % or less of the dyeing solution because it serves for easy control of the generation of sludge and ensures little decrease in dye concentration. It is more preferable for the dye to account for 1.00 mass % or less of the dyeing solution. 
     The dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates according to the first embodiment of the present invention contains (b) an anionic surface active agent as represented by the general formula (1) given below. 
       R 1 —X  (1)
 
     (In the formula, R 1  represents a linear alkyl group having 3 to 30 carbon atoms or a linear alkenyl group having 3 to 30 carbon atoms, and X represents SO 3 Na, SO 3 K, COONa, COONH 4 , or COOK.) 
     R 1  in the general formula (1) is a linear alkyl group having 3 to 30 carbon atoms or a linear alkenyl group having 3 to 30 carbon atoms. It is more preferable for R 1  to be a linear alkyl group having 3 to 20 carbon atoms or a linear alkenyl group having 3 to 20 carbon atoms. Being linear, they can serve more effectively in controlling the dyeing unevenness than branched ones. If R 1  has 3 or more carbon atoms, it is preferable because it serves to allow the surface active agent to have high cleaning capability and also serves to suppress the generation of sludge to ensure a high dye concentration when used for bulk processing of lithographic printing plates. It preferably has 4 or more, more preferably 6 or more, carbon atoms from the viewpoint of obtaining a dyeing solution that serves to achieve a high dye concentration while ensuring little decrease in dye concentration when used for bulk processing of plates. On the other hand, if R 1  has 30 or less carbon atoms, it is preferable because it serves to achieve a moderate hydrophobicity and ensure easy dissolution in the dyeing solution. It preferably has 20 or less, more preferably 12 or less, carbon atoms from the viewpoint of allowing the surface active agent to have high cleaning capability and also serves to suppress dyeing unevenness. 
     X in the general formula (1) represents a hydrophilic group in the anionic surface active agent and it is at least one selected from the group consisting of SO 3 Na, SO 3 K, COONa, COONH 4 , and COOK. Selection of an appropriate hydrophilic group serves to efficiently depress dyeing unevenness. In particular, X is preferably SO 3 Na or COONa, of which SO 3 Na is more preferable. 
     Specific examples of (b) the anionic surface active agent represented by the general formula (1) include sodium octadecane sulphonate, sodium hexadecane sulphonate, sodium pentadecane sulfonate, sodium tetradecane sulfonate, sodium dodecane sulfonate, potassium dodecane sulfonate, sodium decane sulfonate, sodium nonane sulfonate, sodium octane sulfonate, sodium heptane sulfonate, sodium hexane sulfonate, sodium pentane sulfonate, sodium behenate, potassium behenate, sodium stearate, ammonium stearate, potassium stearate, sodium oleate, ammonium oleate, potassium oleate, sodium linoleate, ammonium linoleate, potassium linoleate, sodium palmitate, ammonium palmitate, potassium palmitate, sodium myristate, potassium myristate, sodium laurate, ammonium laurate, potassium laurate, sodium decanoate, ammonium decanoate, potassium decanoate, sodium nonanoate, potassium nonanoate, sodium octanoate, potassium octanoate, sodium heptanoate, ammonium heptanoate, potassium heptanoate, sodium hexanoate, ammonium hexanoate, potassium hexanoate, sodium pentanoate, ammonium pentanoate, potassium pentanoate, sodium butyrate, ammonium butyrate, and potassium butyrate. Of these anionic surface active agents, preferable ones include sodium dodecane sulfonate, potassium dodecane sulfonate, sodium decane sulfonate, sodium nonane sulfonate, sodium octane sulfonate, sodium heptane sulfonate, sodium hexane sulfonate, sodium laurate, ammonium laurate, potassium laurate, sodium decanoate, ammonium decanoate, potassium decanoate, sodium nonanoate, potassium nonanoate, sodium octanoate, potassium octanoate, sodium heptanoate, ammonium heptanoate, potassium heptanoate, sodium hexanoate, ammonium hexanoate, and potassium hexanoate. Two or more thereof may be contained together. 
     It is preferable for these anionic surface active agents to accounts for 0.010 mass % or more in the dyeing solution in order to prevent the generation of sludge in the dyeing solution and ensure little decrease in dye concentration and smaller dyeing unevenness. It is more preferable for the anionic surface active agents to account for 0.020 mass % or more in the dyeing solution. On the other hand, their contents in the dyeing solution are preferably 2.0 mass % or less, more preferably 1.0 mass % or less, in the dyeing solution in order to suppress foaming in the dyeing solution and prevent a decrease in dye concentration. 
     The dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates according to the first embodiment of the present invention contains (c) an organic solvent containing at least one selected from ethers and alcohols. Examples of (c) the ethers and alcohols include ethers such as cyclic ethers, monoethers, and polyethers, and alcohols such as monovalent alcohols, divalent alcohols, and trivalent alcohols, which may be used singly or as a combination of two or more thereof. 
     From the viewpoint of ensuring little decrease in dye concentration and suppressed dyeing unevenness, preferred ethers for use in a dyeing solution for the lithographic printing plates according to the first embodiment of the present invention include alkylene glycol alkyl ethers such as ethylene glycol monoethyl ether, ethylene glycol monopropyl ether, ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, ethylene glycol monohexyl ether, ethylene glycol monoheptyl ether, ethylene glycol monooctyl ether, ethylene glycol dibutyl ether, diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, diethylene glycol dimethyl ether, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether, diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, diethylene glycol dibutyl ether, diethylene glycol monohexyl ether, diethylene glycol monoheptyl ether, diethylene glycol monooctyl ether, triethylene glycol monomethyl ether, triethylene glycol dimethyl ether, triethylene glycol monobutyl ether, triethylene glycol monopentyl ether, triethylene glycol monohexyl ether, tetraethylene glycol dimethyl ether, propylene glycol monomethyl ether, propylene glycol monopropyl ether, propylene glycol monobutyl ether, propylene glycol monopentyl ether, propylene glycol monohexyl ether, propylene glycol monoheptyl ether, propylene glycol monooctyl ether, dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether, dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether, dipropylene glycol monopentyl ether, dipropylene glycol monohexyl ether, dipropylene glycol monooctyl ether, and tripropylene glycol dimethyl ether. 
     Of these, dipropylene glycol monoalkyl ethers and tripropylene glycol monoalkyl ethers as represented by the general formula (2) are preferred from the viewpoint of being more effective in suppressing dyeing unevenness. 
       R 2 —(OC 3 H 6 ) n —OH  (2)
 
     (In the general formula (2), R 2  is any of CH 3 , C 2 H 5 , C 3 H 7 , C 4 H 9 , C 5 H 11 , and C 6 H 13 ; n is 2 or 3; and the (OC 3 H 6 ) chains may be independently branched or linear.) 
     Specific examples of such dipropylene glycol monoalkyl ethers and tripropylene glycol monoalkyl ethers include dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether, dipropylene glycol monoethyl ether, dipropylene glycol monopropyl ether, dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether, dipropylene glycol monohexyl ether, tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether, tripropylene glycol monoethyl ether, tripropylene glycol monopropyl ether, and tripropylene glycol monobutyl ether, of which tripropylene glycol monoalkyl ethers having an n of 3 in the general formula (2) such as tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether, tripropylene glycol monoethyl ether, tripropylene glycol monopropyl ether, and tripropylene glycol monobutyl ether are preferred. 
     Alcohols and ethers to be used as the (c) organic solvent in the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates according to the first embodiment of the present invention preferably has a solubility parameter (SP value) of 9.0 to 13.0 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (18.45 to 26.65 (MPa) 1/2 ) to allow easy penetration of the dyeing solution into the image area in the lithographic printing plate and achieve a higher dye concentration to ensure better plate inspection characteristics. The SP value can be calculated by the Fedors estimation method. Specific examples of such an alcohol include ethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, 2-butanol, tert-butanol, n-hexanol, 3-methoxy butanol, 3-methyl-3-methoxy butanol, tetraethylene glycol, and tripropylene glycol. Specific examples of such an ether include ethylene glycol monoethyl ether, ethylene glycol monopropyl ether, ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, ethylene glycol monohexyl ether, ethylene glycol monoheptyl ether, ethylene glycol monooctyl ether, diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether, diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, diethylene glycol monohexyl ether, diethylene glycol monoheptyl ether, diethylene glycol monooctyl ether, triethylene glycol monomethyl ether, triethylene glycol monobutyl ether, triethylene glycol monopentyl ether, triethylene glycol monohexyl ether, propylene glycol monomethyl ether, propylene glycol monopropyl ether, propylene glycol monobutyl ether, propylene glycol monopentyl ether, propylene glycol monohexyl ether, propylene glycol monoheptyl ether, propylene glycol monooctyl ether, dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether, dipropylene glycol monoethyl ether, dipropylene glycol monopropyl ether, dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether, dipropylene glycol monopentyl ether, dipropylene glycol monohexyl ether, dipropylene glycol monooctyl ether, tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether, tripropylene glycol monoethyl ether, tripropylene glycol monopropyl ether, and tripropylene glycol monobutyl ether. In particular, tripropylene glycol and 3-methyl-3-methoxy butanol are preferred in terms of dyeability, safety, and cost. For alcohols and ethers, the SP value is more preferably 9.5 to 12.5 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (19.48 to 25.63 (MPa) 1/2 ). 
     Furthermore, alcohols and ethers to be used as (c) the organic solvent in the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates according to the first embodiment of the present invention preferably has a vapor pressure of 2,000 Pa or less at 20° C. under 1 atm. This is because when an alcohol or an ether is combined with water to provide a mixed solvent to be used as solvent for a dyeing solution, the generation of sludge can be controlled and the decrease in dye concentration can be further suppressed if the alcohol or ether has a vapor pressure of 2,000 Pa or less at 20° C. This is thought to be because when water, which has a vapor pressure of 2,330 Pa at 20° C., is combined with an alcohol or ether having a vapor pressure of 2,000 Pa or less at 20° C., the amount of the alcohol or ether evaporated from the dyeing solution during bulk processing is smaller than that of water, which allows the dye to have higher dissolution stability in the dyeing solution to suppress the generation of sludge. Examples of such an alcohol include n-propanol, n-butanol, 2-butanol, tert-butanol, n-hexanol, 3-methyl-3-methoxy butanol, tetraethylene glycol, and tripropylene glycol, of which 3-methyl-3-methoxy butanol is preferred. Furthermore, specific examples of such an ether include ethylene glycol monoethyl ether, ethylene glycol monopropyl ether, ethylene glycol monobutyl ether, ethylene glycol monohexyl ether, ethylene glycol monoheptyl ether, ethylene glycol monooctyl ether, diethylene glycol monomethyl ether, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether, diethylene glycol monobutyl ether, diethylene glycol monohexyl ether, diethylene glycol monoheptyl ether, diethylene glycol monooctyl ether, triethylene glycol monomethyl ether, triethylene glycol monobutyl ether, triethylene glycol monopentyl ether, triethylene glycol monohexyl ether, propylene glycol monomethyl ether, propylene glycol monopropyl ether, propylene glycol monobutyl ether, propylene glycol monopentyl ether, propylene glycol monohexyl ether, propylene glycol monoheptyl ether, propylene glycol monooctyl ether, dipropylene glycol monomethyl ether, dipropylene glycol monoethyl ether, dipropylene glycol monopropyl ether, dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether, dipropylene glycol monopentyl ether, dipropylene glycol monohexyl ether, dipropylene glycol monooctyl ether, tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether, tripropylene glycol monoethyl ether, tripropylene glycol monopropyl ether, and tripropylene glycol monobutyl ether. 
     In the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates according to the first embodiment of the present invention, the organic solvent containing at least one of (c) the ethers and alcohols preferably accounts for 3.0 mass % to 30.0 mass %, more preferably 5.0 mass % to 25.0 mass %, and still more preferably 7.5 mass % to 20.0 mass %, of the dyeing solution. If (c) the ethers and alcohols account for 3.0 mass % or more, it ensures easy penetration of the dyeing solution into the image area in the lithographic printing plate and serves to maintain a high dye concentration state. On the other hand, if their content is 30.0 mass % or less, it is not disadvantageous from an economic point of view, but serves to prevent the removal of the non-image area from the lithographic printing plate. 
     &lt;Dyeing Method for Lithographic Printing Plates Containing the Dyeing Solution for Lithographic Printing Plates According to the First Embodiment&gt; 
     The dyeing method for lithographic printing plates containing the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates according to the first embodiment includes a step for dyeing the image area with the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates according to the first embodiment of the present invention during or after development of a lithographic printing plate precursor. The lithographic printing plate precursor, the production method for lithographic printing plates, and the dyeing method are identical to the &lt;lithographic printing plate precursor used for the second embodiment&gt;, the &lt;production method for the lithographic printing plates used for the second embodiment&gt;, and the &lt;dyeing method for lithographic printing plates according to the second embodiment&gt; described later. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution Used for the Second Embodiment&gt; 
     The dyeing solution used for the second embodiment of the present invention contains an organic solvent and, in order to dye the image area formed on the lithographic printing plate, it holds the relation |β−α|&lt;5 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (|β−α|&lt;10.25 (MPa) 1/2 ) wherein β is the solubility parameter (SP value) of the polymer compound contained in the image area while α is the SP value of the organic solvent. 
     The organic solvent contained in the dyeing solution used for the second embodiment of the present invention serves to slightly dissolve the image area formed on the lithographic printing plate and allows the dye to penetrate into the image area, thereby improving the dyeability. Therefore, the SP value β of the polymer compound contained in the image area and the SP value α of the organic solvent are preferably close to each other and preferably holds the relation |β−α|&lt;5 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (|β−α|&lt;10.25 (MPa) 1/2 ). The SP value can be calculated by the Fedors estimation method. 
     Here, in the case where the image area contains a plurality of polymer compounds or where the dyeing solution used for the second embodiment according to the present invention contains a plurality of organic solvents, the SP value of each component is multiplied by its content ratio and summed up to provide the SP value to be used above. For example, in the case where the dyeing solution used for the second embodiment according to the present invention contains an organic solvent 1 (having a SP value of α 1 ) and an organic solvent 2 (having a SP value of α 2 ) in the ratio of 6:4 by mass, the SP value α of the organic solvent is calculated as a 1 ×0.6+a 2 ×0.4. 
     Furthermore, in order to achieve an increased dye concentration while preventing the fixation of the dye due to excessive dissolution of the image area, it is preferable that the relation 1&lt;β−α&lt;5 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (2.05&lt;β−α&lt;10.25 (M Pa) 1/2 ) be held. 
     It is more preferable for any polymer compound contained in the image area to have a SP value of 10 to 17 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (20.5 to 34.85 (MPa) 1/2 ), more preferably 12 to 17 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (24.6 to 34.85 (MPa) 1/2 ). Examples of such polymer compounds include phenol resins such as phenol novolac resin (SP value: 16.4 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (33.62 (MPa) 1/2 )) and cresol novolac resin (SP value: 15.2 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (31.16 (MPa) 1/2 )); melamine resins such as imino type methylated melamine resin (SP value: 13.8 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (28.29 (MPa) 1/2 )), methylol type methylated melamine resin (SP value: 11.5 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (23.58 (MPa) 1/2 )), and alkyl type methylated melamine resin (SP value: 10.5 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (21.53 (MPa) 1/2 )); and others such as epoxy resin (SP value: 10.9 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (22.35 (MPa) 1/2 )), cellulose nitrate (SP value: 10.1 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (20.7 (MPa) 1/2 )), and polyurethane (SP value: 10.0 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (20.5 (MPa) 1/2 )). In particular, the use of a phenol resin and/or a melamine resin is preferable because it is not dissolved excessively in the organic solvent and does not cause significant dyeing unevenness. 
     For the combination of an organic solvent (SP value α) and a polymer compound (SP value β), any organic solvent and polymer compound cited herein can be used and, for example, a combination of an alcohol and a novolac resin or a combination of an alcohol and a melamine resin may be adopted. In particular, it is preferable to use a combination of a tripropylene glycol and a phenol novolac resin, a combination of a tripropylene glycol and an imino type methylated melamine resin, a combination of a dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether and an imino type methylated melamine resin, or a combination of a 3-methyl-3-methoxy butanol and an imino type methylated melamine resin. 
     It is preferable for the organic solvent contained in the dyeing solution used for the second embodiment according to the present invention to have a SP value of 9.0 to 13.0 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  (18.45 to 26.65 (MPa) 1/2 ) because it serves to realize easy penetration of the dyeing solution into the image area in the lithographic printing plate to ensure a higher dye concentration, thereby leading to better plate inspection characteristics. Furthermore, the organic solvent is preferably an ether and/or an alcohol, and it is more preferable to be (c) an organic solvent containing at least one of ethers and alcohols as defined for the first embodiment. 
     The dyeing solution used for the second embodiment according to the present invention may contain (a) a dye as defined for the first embodiment. 
     The dyeing solution used for the second embodiment according to the present invention may contain an anionic surface active agent as defined for the first embodiment. More preferably, it contains an anionic surface active agent as represented by the general formula (3) given below. 
       R 1 —X  (3)
 
     (In the formula, R 1  represents a linear alkyl group having 6 to 10 carbon atoms, and X represents SO 3 Na, SO 3 K, COONa, COONH 4 , or COOK.) 
     Specific examples of such an anionic surface active agent include those anionic surface active agents as represented by the general formula (1) given above. 
     &lt;Lithographic Printing Plate Precursor Used for the Second Embodiment&gt; 
     Next, the lithographic printing plate precursor used for the second embodiment of the present invention is described below. The lithographic printing plate precursor used for the second embodiment of the present invention can be applied to either normal wet offset printing plates or waterless offset printing plates, but from the viewpoint of dyeability, it is preferably applied to waterless offset printing plates. A waterless offset printing plate used for the second embodiment of the present invention has a substrate. In addition, it also has at least a heat-sensitive layer and an ink repellent layer on or above the substrate. Either of the heat-sensitive layer and ink repellent layer may be located nearer to the substrate, but it is preferable for the substrate, the heat-sensitive layer, and the ink repellent layer to be disposed in this order. 
     The heat-sensitive layer of a waterless offset printing plate contains a polymer compound. The polymer compound is identical to the polymer compound contained in the image area described in the above section &lt;Dyeing solution used for the second embodiment&gt;. The polymer compound preferably accounts for 50 mass % or more, more preferably 70 mass % or more, in the heat-sensitive layer of a waterless offset lithographic printing plate. If the polymer compound accounts for 50 mass % or more, it is preferable because it ensures a small dyeing unevenness and stable plate inspection characteristics. Furthermore, the polymer compound preferably accounts for 95 mass % or less, more preferably 90 mass % or less, in the heat-sensitive layer of a waterless offset lithographic printing plate. If the polymer compound accounts for 95 mass % or less, it is preferable because it serves to suppress excessive dissolution of the image area by the dyeing solution and prevent a decrease in dye concentration. 
     &lt;Production Method for Lithographic Printing Plate Used for the Second Embodiment&gt; 
     To produce a lithographic printing plate used for the second embodiment, the lithographic printing plate precursor described above is processed by a method including whether the step (a) or the step (2) described below: 
     step (1) including a step (A) for performing light exposure according to an image (light exposure step), and 
     step (2) performed after the step (A) for performing light exposure and including a step (B) for applying physical friction to the light-exposed lithographic printing plate precursor to remove the ink repellent layer in the light-exposed region (development step). 
     The resulting lithographic printing plate is the remainder of the lithographic printing plate precursor left after removing a part of the ink repellent layer that corresponds to the light-exposed region of the surface. 
     First, the light exposure step (A) is described below. In the light exposure step (A), the lithographic printing plate precursor is exposed to light according to an image. In the case of a lithographic printing plate precursor having a protective film, light may be applied through the protective film or after removing the protective film. For the light exposure step (A), it is preferable to use a light source in the emission wavelength range of 300 nm to 1,500 nm. In particular, the use of a semiconductor laser or a YAG laser having an emission wavelength range near the near infrared region is preferred because wavelengths in this range are widely adopted as absorption wavelengths of heat-sensitive layers. Specifically, laser beams having wavelengths of 780 nm, 808 nm, 830 nm, or 1,064 nm are used suitably for light exposure from the viewpoint of the efficiency of conversion into heat. The light exposure is preferably 150 mJ/cm 2  or more in order to cause heat decompose of the image area to ensure easy penetration of the dyeing solution and an increase in dye concentration. 
     Next, the development step (B) is described below. In the development step (B), physical friction is applied to the light-exposed lithographic printing plate precursor to remove the ink repellent layer in the light-exposed region. Useful methods for applying physical friction include (i) a method of wiping the plate surface with nonwoven fabric, absorbent cotton, cloth, sponge, or the like, containing a developer, (ii) a method of pre-treating the plate surface with a developer and subsequently rubbing it with a rotating brush in a shower of tap water or the like, and (iii) a method of applying a jet of high pressure water, warm water, or water vapor onto the plate surface. 
     Prior to development, the lithographic printing plate precursor may be pre-treated by immersing it in a pre-treatment liquid for a certain period of time. Examples of the pre-treatment liquid include water, water containing a polar solvent such as alcohol, ketone, ester, or carboxylic acid, a solution prepared by adding a polar solvent to a solvent containing at least one of aliphatic hydrocarbons, aromatic hydrocarbons, and the like, and polar solvents. 
     Another example of the pre-treatment liquid is one that contains a polyethylene ether diol and a diamine compound having two or more primary amino groups as described in Japanese Patent No. 4839987. More specific examples of the pre-treatment liquid include PP-1, PP-3, PP-F, PP-FII, PTS-1, CP-1, CP-Y, NP-1, and DP-1 (all manufactured by Toray Industries, Inc.). 
     Useful developers include, for example, water, an aqueous solution in which water accounts for 50 mass % or more of the entire solution, alcohol, and paraffin based hydrocarbon. Other examples include mixtures of water and propylene glycol derivatives such as propylene glycol, dipropylene glycol, triethylene glycol, polypropylene glycol, and alkylene oxide adducts to polypropylene glycol. More specific examples of the developer include HP-N and WH-3 (both manufactured by Toray Industries, Inc.). A conventional surface active agent may also be added as a component of the developer. From the viewpoint of safety, disposal cost, and the like, it is preferable to use a surface active agent that forms an aqueous solution having a pH of 5 to 8. The surface active agent preferably accounts for 10 mass % or less of the developer. Such a developer is very safe and also preferred in terms of economical features such as disposal cost. On the other hand, the developer in use is preferably free of organic solvents in order to prevent dyeing unevenness from being caused by excessive dissolution of the light-exposed region (image area). 
     &lt;Dyeing Method for Lithographic Printing Plates According to the Second Embodiment&gt; 
     Then, the exposed region (image area) deprived of the ink repellent layer is dyed with the dyeing solution used for the second embodiment according to the present invention. Here, dyeing of the image area with a dyeing solution may be performed simultaneously with development or dyeing may be performed after development. In the dyeing step, furthermore, rubbing with a brush etc. may be performed while dyeing in order to enhance the degree of level dyeing and achieve supplementary development of portions left incompletely light-exposed in the development step. A step for drying the dyeing solution on the image area may be included in order to increase the dye concentration by fixing the dye after the contact of the dyeing solution with the image area. Useful drying methods include heating and air-blowing, although there are no specific limitations thereon. 
     A part or the entirety of the above development step can be automated using an automatic developing machine. Useful automatic developing machines include the following: an apparatus containing only a developing unit, an apparatus containing a pre-treatment unit and a developing unit in this order, an apparatus containing a pre-treatment unit, a developing unit, and a post-treatment unit in this order, and an apparatus containing a pre-treatment unit, a developing unit, a post-treatment unit, and a rinsing unit in this order. Specific examples of such automatic developing machines include the TWL-650 series, TWL-860 series, and TWL-1160 series (all manufactured by Toray Industries, Inc.), and an automatic developing machine equipped with a bearer having a curved dent to reduce scratches on the back of the plate as described in Japanese Unexamined Patent Publication (Kokai) No. HEI 5-6000. These may be used in combination. When using such an automatic development machine, the dyeing solution according to the present invention is preferably introduced into the post-treatment unit. 
     In preparation for storing the developed lithographic printing plates stacked in a pile, it is preferable to provide interleaving paper sheets between the plates in order to protect the plate surfaces. 
     The present invention will now be illustrated with reference to Examples, but the present invention should not be construed as being limited thereto. 
     EXAMPLES 
     (1) Evaluation of Dye Concentration 
     (1) Plate Preparation in Examples 1 to 10 and Comparative Examples 1 to 5 
     Toray waterless offset lithographic printing plate IMPRIMA™ MC (manufactured by Toray Industries, Inc., image area containing a polymer compound consisting of phenol novolac resin and polyurethane at 70.6:29.4, the polymer compound having a SP value β of 14.5 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2 ) was exposed to light using a light exposure machine for CTP (PlateRite HD 8900N-E, manufactured by Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd.) under the condition of an exposure energy of 180 mJ/cm 2  (drum rotating speed: 140 rpm). Then, a solid image and 50% halftone dot image were formed at 2,400 dpi and 175 Ipi on a lithographic printing plate precursor having a size of 560 mm in length and 330 mm in width. After feeding tap water to the pre-treatment tank and development tank, feeding a dyeing solution prepared in each Example or Comparative example (dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates to dyeing solution 15 for lithographic printing plates) to the post-treatment tank, and feeing tap water to the rinsing tank in an automatic development machine (TWL-1160F, manufactured by Toray Industries, Inc.), light-exposed precursors were passed through at a speed of 40 cm/min, thereby preparing a total of 1,000 lithographic printing plates. 
     (1-2) Plate Preparation in Examples 11 to 20 and Comparative Example 6 
     Any of waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 1 to waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 4, which had an image layer containing a specified polymer compound as described in each Example or Comparative example, was exposed to light using a light exposure machine for CTP (PlateRite HD 8900N-E, manufactured by Dainippon Screen Mfg. Co., Ltd.) under the conditions of an exposure energy of 125 mJ/cm 2  (Examples 11 to 17 and Comparative example 6) or 150 mJ/cm 2  (Examples 18 to 20). Then, a solid image and 50% halftone dot image were formed at 2,400 dpi and 175 lpi on a lithographic printing plate precursor having a size of 560 mm in length and 330 mm in width. After feeding tap water to the pre-treatment tank, feeding a 10% aqueous triethylene glycol solution (Examples 11 to 18 and Comparative example 6) or tap water (Examples 19 and 20) to the development tank, feeding a dyeing solution as described in each Example or Comparative example (dyeing solution 16 for lithographic printing plates to dyeing solution 21 for lithographic printing plates) to the post-treatment tank, and feeding tap water to the rinsing tank in an automatic development machine (TWL-1160F, manufactured by Toray Industries, Inc.), light-exposed precursors were passed through at a speed of 40 cm/min, thereby preparing a total of 1,000 lithographic printing plates. In Example 20, furthermore, the light-exposed precursor, after passing though the post-treatment tank, was dried in hot air to remove the post-treatment solution from the image area using a hot air generator (HAP3051, manufactured by Hakko Electric Co., Ltd.) under the conditions of an air supply rate of 2 m 3 /min, outlet air temperature of 100° C., and outlet-to-image area distance of 10 cm. 
     From among the lithographic printing plates prepared in (1-1) and (1-2), the first lithographic printing plate was taken and its solid image was examined using a reflection density measuring instrument (Spectro Eye, manufactured by X-rite). Then the resulting reflection density measurement was adopted to represent the reflection density of the image area. Subsequently, the non-image area was examined using a reflection density measuring instrument (Spectro Eye, manufactured by X-rite), and the resulting measurement was adopted to represent the reflection density of the non-image area. Reflection density measurements were taken using a cyan, yellow, or magenta filter to determine the difference between the reflection density of the non-image area and that of the image area with each filter installed. Among the absolute values of the differences, which are denoted by ΔD C , ΔD Y , and ΔD M , the largest one was adopted to represent the dye concentration. Then, the 1,000th lithographic printing plate was examined to determine its dye concentration by the same procedure. A plate is is judged to be practically acceptable if it has a dye concentration of 0.25 or more, preferably 0.40 or more, more preferably 0.50 or more, still more preferably 0.60 or more, and still more preferably 0.70 or more. 
     The reflection density measurement instrument (Spectro Eye, manufactured by X-rite) was set up as follows: built-in filter “No”, white base “Auto”, light source “D50”, observation field of view “2°”, and concentration standard “ISO T”. Then, after selecting the “cyan filter” in the concentration measurement mode setting, the reflection density of the light-exposed portion and that of the non-exposed portion were measured. Subsequently, the same measurement procedure was carried out after replacing the filter with the yellow one and with the magenta one. 
     (2) Evaluation of Dye Concentration Retention Rate 
     The dye concentration retention rate was calculated by the equation (I) given below where (A) is the dye concentration of the first lithographic printing plate and (B) is the dye concentration of the 1,000th lithographic printing plate. A plate is judged to be practically acceptable if it has a dye concentration retention rate of 75.0% or more, preferably 80.0% or more, more preferably 90.0% or more, still more preferably 95.0% or more, and still more preferably 98.0% or more. 
       Dye concentration retention rate (%)=( B )/( A )×100  (I)
 
     (3) Evaluation of Dyeing Unevenness 
     For the 1,000 lithographic printing plates prepared in the section “(1) Evaluation of dye concentration”, 50% halftone areas were examined using Spectro Eye (manufactured by X-rite) to measure the image area rate, followed by counting the number of plates that suffered dyeing unevenness, that is, those containing regions in which the image area rate was 40% or less. A group of plates is judged to be practically acceptable if the number of plates suffering dyeing unevenness is 20 or less, preferably 15 or less, more preferably 12 or less, still more preferably 8 or less, and still more preferably 4 or less. 
     Example 1 
     The dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates was prepared by stirring and mixing the following components at room temperature. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 1 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Rhodamine 6G (xanthene based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium behenate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 21 carbon atoms and X is COONa): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: methanol (alcohol having a SP value α of 13.8 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 12,300 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.45; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.35; the dye concentration retention rate was 77.8%; and 18 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 2 
     The dyeing solution 2 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing solution 2 for lithographic printing plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium behenate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 21 carbon atoms and X is COONa): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: methanol (alcohol having a SP value α of 13.8 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 12,300 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 2 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.61; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.47; the dye concentration retention rate was 77.0%; and 18 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 3 
     The dyeing solution 3 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 3 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium stearate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 17 carbon atoms and X is COONa) (manufactured by Showa Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: methanol (alcohol having a SP value α of 13.8 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 12,300 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 3 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.55; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.42; the dye concentration retention rate was 76.4%; and 14 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 4 
     The dyeing solution 4 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 4 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium octane sulfonate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 8 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: methanol (alcohol having a SP value α of 13.8 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 12,300 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 4 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.52; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.40; the dye concentration retention rate was 76.9%; and 10 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 5 
     The dyeing solution 5 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 5 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium hexane sulfonate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 6 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: methanol (alcohol having a SP value α of 13.8 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 12,300 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 5 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.52; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.40; the dye concentration retention rate was 76.9%; and 10 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 6 
     The dyeing solution 6 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 6 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium hexane sulfonate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 6 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether (ether represented by the general formula (2) where n is 2; R 2  is C 4 H 9 ; SP value α is 10.2 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2 ; and vapor pressure is 5.3 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 6 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.66; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.63; the dye concentration retention rate was 95.5%; and 4 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 7 
     The dyeing solution 7 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 7 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium hexane sulfonate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 6 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether (ether represented by the general formula (2) where n is 3; R 2  is CH 3 ; SP value α is 10.3 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2 ; and vapor pressure is 4 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 7 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and very good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.70; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.68; the dye concentration retention rate was 97.1%; and 2 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 8 
     The dyeing solution 8 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 8 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.500 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium hexane sulfonate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 6 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.050 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: tripropylene glycol monomethyl ether (ether represented by the general formula (2) where n is 3; R 2  is CH 3 ; SP value α is 10.3 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2 ; and vapor pressure is 4 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.5 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 8 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and very good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 1.16; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 1.11; the dye concentration retention rate was 95.7%; and 2 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 9 
     The dyeing solution 9 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 9 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium hexane sulfonate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 6 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: tripropylene glycol (alcohol having a SP value α of 12.4 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 140 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 9 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and very good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.66; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.65; the dye concentration retention rate was 98.5%; and 4 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 10 
     The dyeing solution 10 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. &lt;Dyeing Solution 10 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium hexane sulfonate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 6 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: 3-methyl-3-methoxy butanol (alcohol having a SP value α of 10.5 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 67 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 10 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and very good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.75; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.74; the dye concentration retention rate was 98.7%; and 2 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Comparative Example 1 
     The dyeing solution 11 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 11 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium hexane sulfonate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 6 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: butyl acetate (ester having a SP value α of 9.1 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 1,200 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Showa Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 11 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and results showed that the first plate and the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.19 and a dye concentration of 0.00, respectively, indicating that the plates were practically unacceptable in terms of dye concentration. This is considered to be because the dissolution stability of the dye in the dyeing solution was low to cause a decrease in dye concentration. 
     Comparative Example 2 
     The dyeing solution 12 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 12 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Nonionic surface active agent: polyoxyethylene lauryl ether (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: tetrahydrofuran (ether having a SP value α of 9.1 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 18,900 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 12 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and results showed that the first plate and the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.20 and a dye concentration of 0.14, respectively, that the dye concentration retention rate was 70.0%, and that 30 plates suffered dyeing unevenness, indicating that the plates were practically unacceptable in terms of dye concentration and dyeing unevenness. 
     Comparative Example 3 
     The dyeing solution 13 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 13 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium butylnaphthalene sulfonate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a naphthyl group having a linear alkyl group having 4 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: tetrahydrofuran (ether having a SP value α of 9.1 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 18,900 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 13 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and results showed that the first plate and the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.24 and a dye concentration of 0.20, respectively, that the dye concentration retention rate was 83.3%, and that 32 plates suffered dyeing unevenness, indicating that the plates were practically unacceptable in terms of dye concentration and dyeing unevenness. 
     Comparative Example 4 
     The dyeing solution 14 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 14 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium 2-methyl-2-propene-1-sulfonate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a branched alkyl group having 4 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: tetrahydrofuran (ether having a SP value α of 9.1 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 18,900 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 14 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and results showed that the first plate and the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.50 and a dye concentration of 0.38, respectively, that the dye concentration retention rate was 76.0%, and that 24 plates suffered dyeing unevenness, indicating that the plates were practically unacceptable in terms of dyeing unevenness. 
     Comparative Example 5 
     The dyeing solution 15 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 1 for lithographic printing plates, was evaluated by the same methods as used for Example 1. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 15 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Ethyl Violet (triphenyl methane based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.250 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium hexylsulfate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 6 carbon atoms and X is SO 4 Na) (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 0.025 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: tetrahydrofuran (ether having a SP value α of 9.1 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 18,900 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Mitsubishi Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.7 parts by mass 
     Here, the total quantity of the above components (a) to (d) of the dyeing solution for lithographic printing plates accounts for 100 parts by mass. 
     The dyeing solution 15 for lithographic printing plates was evaluated by the methods described above and results showed that the first plate and the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.49 and a dye concentration of 0.37, respectively, that the dye concentration retention rate was 75.5%, and that 25 plates suffered dyeing unevenness, indicating that the plates were practically unacceptable in terms of dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 11 
     (A) Preparation of Waterless Offset Lithographic Printing Plate Precursor 1 
     A solution of an organic layer composition as described below was spread over a degreased aluminum substrate with a thickness of 0.24 mm (manufactured by Mitsubishi Aluminum Co., Ltd.) and dried at 200° C. for 90 seconds to form an organic layer with a thickness of 6.0 μm. The solution of an organic layer composition was prepared by stirring and mixing the following components at room temperature (20° C. to 28° C.). 
     &lt;Solution of Organic Layer Composition&gt; 
     (a) Polymer having active hydrogen: epoxy resin: EPIKOTE® 1010 (manufactured by Japan Epoxy Resin Co., Ltd.): 35 parts by mass 
     (b) Polymer having active hydrogen: polyurethane: Sanprene® LQ-T1331D (manufactured by Sanyo Chemical Industries Ltd., solid content 20 mass %): 375 parts by mass 
     (c) Aluminum chelate: aluminum chelate ALCH-TR (manufactured by Kawaken Fine Chemicals Co., Ltd.): 10 parts by mass 
     (d) Leveling agent: Disparlon® LC951 (manufactured by Kusumoto Chemicals Co., Ltd., solid content 10 mass %): 1 part by mass 
     (e) Titanium oxide: N,N-dimethyl formamide dispersion liquid of Tipaque® CR-50 (manufactured by Ishihara Sangyo Kaisha, Ltd.) (titanium oxide 50 mass %): 60 parts by mass 
     (f) N—N dimethyl formamide: 730 parts by mass 
     (g) Methyl ethyl ketone: 250 parts by mass 
     Subsequently, an image composition solution 1 was spread over the above organic layer with a wire bar coater and heated for drying at 140° C. for 90 seconds to form a heat-sensitive layer with a thickness of 2.0 μm. Here, the image layer composition solution 1 was prepared by stirring and mixing the following components at room temperature (20° C. to 28° C.). 
     &lt;Image Layer Composition Solution 1&gt; 
     (a) Infrared ray absorbing dye (cyanine pigment): NK5559 (manufactured by Hayashibara Co., Ltd., maximum absorption wavelength 774 nm): 16.0 parts by mass 
     (b) Polymer compound: methacrylic resin PARAPET™ (having a SP value β of 9.1 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2 ) (manufactured by KURARAY Co., Ltd.): 84 parts by mass 
     (c) Methyl ethyl ketone: 900 parts by mass 
     Subsequently, a solution of a silicone rubber layer composition, which had been prepared immediately before application, was applied over the above image layer with a wire bar coater and heated at 140° C. for 80 seconds to form a silicone rubber layer with an average thickness of 2.0 μm, thereby providing a waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 1. Here, the solution of a silicone rubber layer composition was prepared by stirring and mixing the following components at room temperature (20° C. to 28° C.). 
     &lt;Solution of Silicone Rubber Layer Composition&gt; 
     (a) α,ω-divinylpolydimethyl siloxane: DMS-V35 (weight average molecular weight 49,500, manufactured by GELEST Inc.): 86.26 parts by mass 
     (b) Methyl hydrogen siloxane-dimethylsiloxane copolymer RD-1 (manufactured by Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd.): 4.93 parts by mass 
     (c) Vinyl tris(methyl ethyl ketoximino) silane: 2.64 parts by mass 
     (d) Platinum catalyst SRX212 (manufactured by Dow Corning Toray Co., Ltd., platinum catalyst 6.0 mass %): 6.17 parts by mass 
     (e) Isopar® E (manufactured by Exxon Mobile Corporation): 900 parts by mass 
     (B) Preparation of Dyeing Solution 16 for Lithographic Printing Plates 
     The dyeing solution 16 for lithographic printing plates was prepared by stirring and mixing the following components at room temperature. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 16 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Rhodamine 6G (xanthene based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.50 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: xylene (having a SP value α of 8.8 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2 ) (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 99.50 parts by mass 
     For the resulting waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 1 and the dyeing solution 16 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the methods described above and the results obtained were as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.33; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.25; the dye concentration retention rate was 75.8%; and 20 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 12 
     Except for replacing the waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 1 prepared from the image layer composition solution 1 with a waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 2 prepared from an image layer composition solution 2 as described below and replacing the dyeing solution 16 for lithographic printing plates with the undermentioned dyeing solution 17 for lithographic printing plates, the same procedure as in Example 11 was carried out to make an evaluation. 
     &lt;Image Layer Composition Solution 2&gt; 
     (a) Infrared ray absorbing dye (cyanine pigment): NK5559 (manufactured by Hayashibara Co., Ltd., maximum absorption wavelength 774 nm): 16.0 parts by mass 
     (b) Polymer compound: phenol novolac resin Sumilite Resin® PR53195 (having a SP value β of 16.4 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2 ) (manufactured by Sumitomo Bakelite Co., Ltd.): 73.05 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic complex compound: titanium-n-butoxide bis(acetylacetonate): Nācem® Titanium (manufactured by Nihon Kagaku Sangyo Co., Ltd., concentration 73 mass %, containing 27 mass % n-butanol as solvent): 15.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Tetrahydrofuran: 895.95 parts by mass. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 17 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Rhodamine 6G (xanthene based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.50 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium behenate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 21 carbon atoms and X is COONa): 0.05 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: methanol (alcohol having a SP value α of 13.8 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 12,300 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 9.00 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.45 parts by mass 
     For the resulting waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 2 and the dyeing solution 17 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the methods described above and the results obtained were as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.70; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.64; the dye concentration retention rate was 91.4%; and 14 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 13 
     Except for replacing the waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 1 prepared from the image layer composition solution 1 with a waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 3 prepared from an image layer composition solution 3 as described below and replacing the dyeing solution 16 for lithographic printing plates with the undermentioned dyeing solution 18 for lithographic printing plates, the same procedure as in Example 11 was carried out to make an evaluation. 
     &lt;Image Layer Composition Solution 3&gt; 
     (a) Infrared ray absorbing dye (cyanine pigment): NK5559 (manufactured by Hayashibara Co., Ltd., maximum absorption wavelength 774 nm): 16.0 parts by mass 
     (b) Polymer compound: imino type methylated melamine resin Cymel 327 (having a SP value β of 13.8 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2 )) (manufactured by ALLNEX): 83.0 parts by mass 
     (c) P-toluene sulfonic acid: 1.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Methyl ethyl ketone: 900 parts by mass 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 18 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Rhodamine 6G (xanthene based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.50 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium behenate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 21 carbon atoms and X is COONa): 0.05 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: dipropylene glycol monobutyl ether (ether represented by the general formula (2) where n is 2; R 2  is C 4 H 9 ; the SP value α is 10.2 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2 ; and the vapor pressure is 5.3 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Wako Pure Chemical Corporation): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.45 parts by mass 
     For the resulting waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 3 and the dyeing solution 18 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the methods described above and good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.92; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.88; the dye concentration retention rate was 95.7%; and 9 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 14 
     Except for using the undermentioned dyeing solution 19 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 18 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the same methods as used for Example 13. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 19 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Rhodamine 6G (xanthene based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.50 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium behenate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 21 carbon atoms and X is COONa): 0.05 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: 3-methyl-3-methoxy butanol (alcohol having a SP value α of 10.5 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 67 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.45 parts by mass 
     For the resulting dyeing solution 19 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the methods described above and good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 1.01; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.96; the dye concentration retention rate was 95.0%; and 7 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 15 
     Except for using the undermentioned dyeing solution 20 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 18 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the same methods as used for Example 13. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 20 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Rhodamine 6G (xanthene based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.50 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium behenate (represented by the general formula (1) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 21 carbon atoms and X is COONa): 0.05 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: tripropylene glycol (alcohol having a SP value α of 12.4 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 140 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.45 parts by mass 
     For the resulting dyeing solution 20 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the methods described above and good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 1.02; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.97; the dye concentration retention rate was 95.1%; and 7 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 16 
     For the waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 2 and the dyeing solution 20 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the methods described above and results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 1.00; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.95; the dye concentration retention rate was 95.0%; and 6 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 17 
     Except for using the undermentioned dyeing solution 21 for lithographic printing plates, instead of the dyeing solution 20 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the same methods as used for Example 16. 
     &lt;Dyeing Solution 21 for Lithographic Printing Plates&gt; 
     (a) Dye: Rhodamine 6G (xanthene based basic dye) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.50 parts by mass 
     (b) Anionic surface active agent: sodium hexane sulfonate (represented by the general formula (3) where R 1  is a linear alkyl group having 6 carbon atoms and X is SO 3 Na) (manufactured by Tokyo Chemical Industry Co., Ltd.): 0.05 parts by mass 
     (c) Organic solvent: tripropylene glycol (alcohol having a SP value α of 12.4 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2  and a vapor pressure of 140 Pa (20° C.)) (manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich): 9.0 parts by mass 
     (d) Water: 90.45 parts by mass 
     For the resulting dyeing solution 21 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the methods described above and very good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 1.06; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 1.01; the dye concentration retention rate was 95.3%; and 3 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 18 
     Except that a light exposure of 150 mJ/cm 2 , instead of 125 mJ/cm 2 , was applied to the waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 2, an evaluation was made by the same methods as used for Example 17. 
     An evaluation was made by the methods described above and very good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 1.20; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 1.18; the dye concentration retention rate was 98.3%; and 3 plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 19 
     Except that the waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 2 was developed in a development tank that contained tap water instead of a 10% aqueous triethylene glycol solution, an evaluation was made by the same methods as used for Example 18. 
     An evaluation was made by the methods described above and very good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 1.20; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 1.18; the dye concentration retention rate was 98.3%; and a plate suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Example 20 
     Except for drying the image area in hot air to remove the post-treatment solution after the light-exposed waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 2 had passed through the post-treatment tank, an evaluation was made by the same methods as used for Example 19. An evaluation was made by the methods described above and very good results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 1.30; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 1.29; the dye concentration retention rate was 99.2%; and no plates suffered dyeing unevenness. 
     Comparative Example 6 
     Except for replacing the waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 1 prepared from the image layer composition solution 1 with a waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 4 prepared from an image layer composition solution 4 as described below, the same procedure as in Example 11 was carried out to make an evaluation. 
     &lt;Image Layer Composition Solution 4&gt; 
     (a) Infrared ray absorbing dye (cyanine pigment): NK5559 (manufactured by Hayashibara Co., Ltd., maximum absorption wavelength 774 nm): 16.0 parts by mass 
     (b) Polymer compound: carboxymethyl cellulose (having a SP value β of 19.5 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2 )) (manufactured by Daicel FineChem Ltd.): 84 parts by mass 
     (c) Methyl ethyl ketone: 900 parts by mass 
     For the resulting waterless offset lithographic printing plate precursor 4 and the dyeing solution 19 for lithographic printing plates, an evaluation was made by the methods described above and results were obtained as follows: the first plate had a dye concentration of 0.18; the 1,000th plate had a dye concentration of 0.10; the dye concentration retention rate was 55.6%, and 52 plates suffered dyeing unevenness, indicating that the plates were practically unacceptable in terms of dye concentration and dyeing unevenness. The above evaluation results are summarized in Table 1, Table 2, Table 3, and Table 4. 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 Components of dyeing solution 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                 (a) dye 
                 (b) surface active agent 
                 (c) organic solvent 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                   
                 Content 
                   
                 Content 
                   
                 Content 
               
               
                   
                   
                 name 
                 (parts by mass) 
                 name 
                 (parts by mass) 
                 name 
                 (parts by mass) 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Examples 
                 (1) 
                 Rhodamine 6G 
                 0.250 
                 sodium behenate 
                 0.025 
                 methanol 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                 (2) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium behenate 
                 0.025 
                 methanol 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                 (3) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium stearate 
                 0.025 
                 methanol 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                 (4) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium octane sulfonate 
                 0.025 
                 methanol 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                 (5) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium hexane sulfonate 
                 0.025 
                 methanol 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                 (6) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium hexane sulfonate 
                 0.025 
                 dipropylene glycol 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 monobutyl ether 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (7) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium hexane sulfonate 
                 0.025 
                 tripropylene glycol 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 monomethyl ether 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (8) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.500 
                 sodium hexane sulfonate 
                 0.050 
                 tripropylene glycol 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 monomethyl ether 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (9) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium hexane sulfonate 
                 0.025 
                 tripropylene glycol 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                 (10) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium hexane sulfonate 
                 0.025 
                 3-methyl-3-methoxy 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 butanol 
                   
               
               
                 Comparative 
                 (1) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium hexane sulfonate 
                 0.025 
                 butyl acetate 
                 9.0 
               
               
                 examples 
                 (2) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 polyoxyethylene lauryl ether 
                 0.025 
                 tetrahydrofuran 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                 (3) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium butylnaphthalene 
                 0.025 
                 tetrahydrofuran 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 sulfonate 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (4) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium 2-methyl-2-propene- 
                 0.025 
                 tetrahydrofuran 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 1-sulfonate 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (5) 
                 Ethyl Violet 
                 0.250 
                 sodium hexylsulfate 
                 0.025 
                 tetrahydrofuran 
                 9.0 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
               
             
               
                   
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
            
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Evaluation 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 dye concen- 
                   
               
               
                   
                 tration 
               
               
                   
                 retention 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 dye concentration 
                 rate (%) 
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 (A) first 
                 (B) 1,000th 
                 (B)/(A) × 
                 dyeing 
               
               
                   
                 plate 
                 plate 
                 100 
                 unevenness 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Examples 
                 (1) 
                 0.45 
                 0.35 
                 77.8 
                 18 
               
               
                   
                 (2) 
                 0.61 
                 0.47 
                 77.0 
                 18 
               
               
                   
                 (3) 
                 0.55 
                 0.42 
                 76.4 
                 14 
               
               
                   
                 (4) 
                 0.52 
                 0.40 
                 76.9 
                 10 
               
               
                   
                 (5) 
                 0.52 
                 0.40 
                 76.9 
                 10 
               
               
                   
                 (6) 
                 0.66 
                 0.63 
                 95.5 
                 4 
               
               
                   
                 (7) 
                 0.70 
                 0.68 
                 97.1 
                 2 
               
               
                   
                 (8) 
                 1.16 
                 1.11 
                 95.7 
                 2 
               
               
                   
                 (9) 
                 0.66 
                 0.65 
                 98.5 
                 4 
               
               
                   
                 (10) 
                 0.75 
                 0.74 
                 98.7 
                 2 
               
               
                 Comparative 
                 (1) 
                 0.19 
                 0.00 
                 0.0 
                 — 
               
               
                 examples 
                 (2) 
                 0.20 
                 0.14 
                 70.0 
                 30 
               
               
                   
                 (3) 
                 0.24 
                 0.20 
                 83.3 
                 32 
               
               
                   
                 (4) 
                 0.50 
                 0.38 
                 76.0 
                 24 
               
               
                   
                 (5) 
                 0.49 
                 0.37 
                 75.5 
                 25 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 preparation steps for lithographic  
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 printing plate 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                 dyeing solution composition 
                 image layer composition 
                   
                 light exposure 
                   
                 dyeing 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                 organic solvent 
                 anionic surface 
                 polymer compound 
                 difference 
                 step 
                 development 
                 step 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                   
                 SP value α 
                 active agent 
                   
                 SP value β 
                 in SP value 
                 light exposure 
                 step 
                 drying 
               
               
                   
                   
                 name 
                 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2   
                 name 
                 name 
                 (cal/cm 3 ) 1/2   
                 (β−α) 
                 (mJ/cm 2 ) 
                 developer 
                 method 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Examples 
                 (11) 
                 xylene 
                 8.8 
                 none 
                 methacrylic  
                 9.1 
                 0.3 
                 125 
                 10% aqueous  
                 not  
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 resin 
                   
                   
                   
                 triethylene 
                 performed 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 glycol solution 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (12) 
                 methanol 
                 13.8 
                 sodium  
                 phenol novolac  
                 16.4 
                 1.8 
                 125 
                 10% aqueous  
                 not 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 behenate 
                 resin 
                   
                   
                   
                 triethylene 
                 performed 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 glycol solution 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (13) 
                 dipropylene  
                 10.2 
                 sodium 
                 imino type  
                 13.8 
                 3.3 
                 125 
                 10% aqueous  
                 not 
               
               
                   
                   
                 glycol 
                   
                 behenate 
                 methylated 
                   
                   
                   
                 triethylene 
                 performed 
               
               
                   
                   
                 monobutyl  
                   
                   
                 melamine resin 
                   
                   
                   
                 glycol solution 
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 ether 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (14) 
                 3-methyl- 
                 10.5 
                 sodium 
                 imino type  
                 13.8 
                 4.0 
                 125 
                 10% aqueous  
                 not 
               
               
                   
                   
                 3-methoxy 
                   
                 behenate 
                 methylated 
                   
                   
                   
                 triethylene 
                 performed 
               
               
                   
                   
                 butanol 
                   
                   
                 melamine resin 
                   
                   
                   
                 glycol solution 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (15) 
                 tripropylene  
                 12.4 
                 sodium 
                 imino type  
                 13.8 
                 1.4 
                 125 
                 10% aqueous  
                 not 
               
               
                   
                   
                 glycol 
                   
                 behenate 
                 methylated 
                   
                   
                   
                 triethylene 
                 performed 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 melamine resin 
                   
                   
                   
                 glycol solution 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (16) 
                 tripropylene  
                 12.4 
                 sodium 
                 phenol  
                 16.4 
                 4.0 
                 125 
                 10% aqueous  
                 not 
               
               
                   
                   
                 glycol 
                   
                 behenate 
                 novolac resin 
                   
                   
                   
                 triethylene 
                 performed 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 glycol solution 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (17) 
                 tripropylene  
                 12.4 
                 sodium hexane 
                 phenol  
                 16.4 
                 4.0 
                 125 
                 10% aqueous  
                 not 
               
               
                   
                   
                 glycol 
                   
                 sulfonate 
                 novolac resin 
                   
                   
                   
                 triethylene 
                 performed 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 glycol solution 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (18) 
                 tripropylene  
                 12.4 
                 sodium hexane 
                 phenol  
                 16.4 
                 4.0 
                 150 
                 10% aqueous  
                 not 
               
               
                   
                   
                 glycol 
                   
                 sulfonate 
                 novolac resin 
                   
                   
                   
                 triethylene 
                 performed 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 glycol solution 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (19) 
                 tripropylene  
                 12.4 
                 sodium hexane 
                 phenol  
                 16.4 
                 4.0 
                 150 
                 water 
                 not 
               
               
                   
                   
                 glycol 
                   
                 sulfonate 
                 novolac resin 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 performed 
               
               
                   
                 (20) 
                 tripropylene  
                 12.4 
                 sodium hexane 
                 phenol  
                 16.4 
                 4.0 
                 150 
                 water 
                 hot-air 
               
               
                   
                   
                 glycol 
                   
                 sulfonate 
                 novolac resin 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 drying 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Comparative 
                 xylene 
                 8.8 
                 none 
                 carboxymethyl 
                 19.5 
                 10.7 
                 125 
                 10% aqueous  
                 not 
               
               
                 example (6) 
                   
                   
                   
                 cellulose 
                   
                   
                   
                 triethylene 
                 performed 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                 glycol solution 
                   
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
               
             
               
                   
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
            
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Evaluation 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 dye concen- 
                   
               
               
                   
                 tration 
               
               
                   
                 retention 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 dye concentration 
                 rate (%) 
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 (A) first 
                 (B) 1,000th 
                 (B)/(A) × 
                 dyeing 
               
               
                   
                 plate 
                 plate 
                 100 
                 unevenness 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Examples 
                 (11) 
                 0.33 
                 0.25 
                 75.8 
                 20 
               
               
                   
                 (12) 
                 0.70 
                 0.64 
                 91.4 
                 14 
               
               
                   
                 (13) 
                 0.92 
                 0.88 
                 95.7 
                 9 
               
               
                   
                 (14) 
                 1.01 
                 0.96 
                 95.0 
                 7 
               
               
                   
                 (15) 
                 1.02 
                 0.97 
                 95.1 
                 7 
               
               
                   
                 (16) 
                 1.00 
                 0.95 
                 95.0 
                 6 
               
               
                   
                 (17) 
                 1.06 
                 1.01 
                 95.3 
                 3 
               
               
                   
                 (18) 
                 1.20 
                 1.18 
                 98.3 
                 3 
               
               
                   
                 (19) 
                 1.20 
                 1.18 
                 98.3 
                 1 
               
               
                   
                 (20) 
                 1.30 
                 1.29 
                 99.2 
                 0 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Comparative 
                 0.18 
                 0.10 
                 55.6 
                 52 
               
               
                 example (6)