Patent Publication Number: US-5294581-A

Title: Process and catalyst for producing mildly elastomeric primarily isotactic polymers

Description:
This is a division of application Ser. No. 484,724, filed Feb. 26, 1990 and now U.S. Pat. No. 5,118,767. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention relates to a catalyst which is useful in the production of mildly elastomeric, primarily isotactic polymers and a process for producing such polymers using said catalyst. Such polymers are generally characterized in that they are non-sticky, flexible and spring back when deformed to a small degree but not when deformed to a large degree, i.e., generally have an elasticity of less than 50%. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,335,225, issued Jun. 15, 1982, discloses a fractionable elastic polypropylene which is said to have an isotactic content of 55% or less and also to contain some syndiotactic and atactic polypropylene. This patent, and its companions on the catalyst system for making this elastic polypropylene, contain much information about elastic-type polypropylene compositions, although the researchers at Montecatini, especially including Giulio Natta, produced some polypropylene compositions which exhibited some of the characteristics of elastomeric compositions. Specifically, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,175,999; 3,257,370 and 3,258,455 disclose polypropylene compositions which have some elastic-type properties. 
     Mildly elastomeric polypropylene is different from the &#34;normal&#34; or more well known polypropylenes. These more well known types are crystalline and amorphous polypropylenes. It is normally accepted that crystalline polypropylene generally has the isotactic or syndiotactic structure and that amorphous polypropylene generally has considerable atactic structure. Giulio Natta&#39;s U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,112,300 and 3,112,301 describe isotactic polypropylene and give structural formulae for isotactic and syndiotactic polypropylene. The former is a straight chain of propylene units wherein the methyl groups are all aligned on one side of the polymer chain. In the latter, the methyl groups alternate from one side of the chain to the other. In atactic polypropylene, the methyl groups are arranged randomly on the two sides of the chain. 
     Almost all of the polypropylene which is used commercially is crystalline isotactic polypropylene. These products are well known and have been the subject of many patents and articles. Amorphous polypropylenes, which have very little strength, are used commercially primarily in adhesives and asphalt additives. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to a process for producing mildly elastomeric, priamarily isotactic polymers of olefins and a catalyst component which is useful in such production. The catalyst comprises the reaction product of a magnesium alkoxide compound, which may be of the formula MgR 1  R 2 , where R 1  is an alkoxide or aryl oxide group and R 2  is an alkoxide or aryl oxide group or halogen, and a tetravalent titanium halide wherein the reaction takes place in the presence of an electron donor. The catalyst is completed by using an organoaluminum compound and a selectivity control agent which is an effectively unhindered heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen compound. 
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The &#34;normal&#34; well known polypropylenes discussed above are generally high molecular weight materials which consist of blocks of monomer units of relatively or extremely long average isotactic block length (&lt;Liso&gt;), for example, 50 to 200 monomers units. The prior art isotactic polymers (prepared via a MgCl 2  supported catalyst) of short average isotactic block length (about 6 to 15 monomer units) normally contain a wide distribution of polymer blocks of varying lengths and are characterized by having relatively low tensile strength and being tacky to the touch. 
     The polypropylene compositions of the present invention are specifically characterized in that they have a narrow distribution of relatively short block lengths and may be characterized as exhibiting higher tensile strength than polymers of the same block length (about 15 to 35) prepared according to known methods. By &#34;block lengths&#34; it is meant the number of recurring monomer, in this case propylene, units which, on the average, occur before there is a defect in the polymer chain. By &#34;defect&#34; it is meant that the symmetry of the recurring units is ended and there may begin a different structure (i.e. a change from isotactic to syndiotactic) or units of another monomer may be placed therein. It is theorized that the average block length, as determined by a numerical integration of the penteds which occur in the  13  C NMR spectrum, may have a great effect on the properties of the polymer in most, but not necessarily all, cases. For instance, relatively short block lengths, i.e. about 15 to 35, tend to occur in a polymer which exhibits low tensile strength such as that produced in U.S. Pat. No. 3,278,512. On the other hand, block lengths of greater than about 50 are characteristic of commercial, very stiff, highly crystalline isotactic polypropylene. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 4,335,225, discussed above, discloses how to make an elastomeric polypropylene composition which contains up to 55%, and preferably much less, isotactic polypropylene. This polypropylene has an inherent viscosity of 1.5 to 8, a major melting point between 135° and 155° C., exhibits no yield point, has a tensile set not exceeding 150% and contains 10 to 80% by weight of a diethyl ether-soluble fraction which has an inherent viscosity exceeding 1.5 wherein said fraction has an isotactic crystalline content of about 0.5% to about 5% by weight. A special catalyst, which is the subject of several other related patents, is said to be required to make this material. These catalysts are homogeneous zirconium or hafnium catalysts supported upon partially hydrated alumina. Such catalyst systems are difficult to work with, have extremely low productivities (on the order of 1-2% of the productivities of the catalysts of this invention) and are not used commercially to any appreciable extent. 
     The polyolefins of the present invention are made with a well known type of catalyst for which there is a wealth of commercial experience and knowledge. The catalyst is comprised of the reaction product of a magnesium alkoxide compound, which may be of the formula MgR 1  R 2 , where R 1  is an alkoxy or aryl oxide group and R 2  is an alkoxide or an aryl oxide group or halogen, and a tetravalent titanium halide wherein the reaction takes place in the presence of an electron donor and, preferably, a halogenated hydrocarbon. Such procatalysts are well known and have been used for several years commercially. The catalyst is completed by the addition of an organoaluminum compound and a selectivity control agent which is an effectively unhindered heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen compound. 
     Examples of halogen containing magnesium compounds that can be used as starting materials for the halogenating reaction are alkoxy and aryloxy magnesium halides, such as isbutoxy magnesium chloride, ethoxy magnesium bromide, phenoxy magnesium iodide, cumyloxy magnesium bromide, naphthenoxy magnesium chloride and Mg 4  (OMe) 6  (MEOH) 10  Cl 2 . 
     Preferred magnesium compounds to be halogenated are selected from magnesium dialkoxides and magnesium diaryloxides. In such compounds the alkoxide groups suitable have from 1 to 8 carbon atoms, and preferably from 2 to 8 carbon atoms. Examples of these preferred groups of compounds are magnesium di-isopropoxide, magnesium diethoxide, magnesium dibutoxide, magnesium diphenoxide, magnesium dinaphthenoxide and ethoxy magnesium isobutoxide. Magnesium alkoxides disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,710,482, issued Dec. 1, 1987 to Robert C. Job, are also preferred for use herein. These magnesium alkoxides have the formula [Mg 4  (OR 3 ) 6  (R 4  OH) 10  ]X where X is a counterion or ions having a total charge of -2 and R 3  and R 4 , which may be the same or different, are selected from alkyl groups of 1 to 4 carbon atoms. Especially preferred is Mg 4  (OCH 3 ) 6  (CH 3  OH) 10  X 2  where X is resorcinol or a substituted resorcinol monoanion. 
     Magnesium compounds comprising one alkyl group and one alkoxide or aryloxide group can be employed, as well as compounds comprising one aryl group and one alkoxide or aryloxide group. Examples of such compounds are phenyl magnesium phenoxide, ethyl magnesium butoxide, ethyl magnesium phenoxide and naphthyl magnesium isoamyloxide. 
     In the halogenation with a halide of tetravalent titanium, the magnesium compounds are preferably reacted to form a magnesium halide in which the atomic ratio of halogen to magnesium is at least 1.2. Better results are obtained when the halogenation proceeds more completely, i.e. yielding magnesium halides in which the atomic ratio of halogen to magnesium is at least 1.5. Except in cases where resorcinols are used, the most preferred reactions are those leading to fully halogenated reaction products. Such halogenation reactions are suitably effected by employing a molar ratio of magnesium compound to titanium compound of 0.005:1 to 2:1, preferably 0.01:1 to 1:1. These halogenation reactions may be conducted in the additional presence of an halohydrocarbon and an electron donor. An inert hydrocarbon diluent or solvent may be used as a partial substitute for the halohydrocarbon. 
     Suitable electron donors are ethers, esters, ketones, phenols, amines, amides, imines, nitriles, phosphines, silanes, phosphites, stibines, arsines, phosphoramides and alcoholates. Examples of suitable donors are those referred to in U.S. Pat. No. 4,442,276. Preferred donors are esters. Preferred esters are esters of aliphatic and aromatic dicarboxylic acids, such as dimethyl carbonate, dimethyl adipate, dihexyl fumarate, dibutyl maleate, ethylisopropyl oxalate, diethyl phthalate and diisobutyl phthalate. Preferred electron donors for use in preparing the titanium constituent are the dialkylphthalates. 
     Suitable halides of tetravalent titanium include aryloxy- or alkoxy-di and -trihalides, such as dihexanoxy-titanium dichloride, diethoxy-titanium dibromide, isopropoxy-titanium tri-iodide and phenoxytitanium trichloride. Titanium tetrahalides are preferred. Most preferred is titanium tetrachloride. 
     Suitable halohydrocarbons are compounds such as butyl chloride, amyl chloride and the following more preferred compounds. Preferred aliphatic halohydrocarbons are halogen-substituted hydrocarbons with 1 to 12, particularly less than 9, carbon atoms per molecule, comprising at least two halogen atoms, such as dibromomethane, trichloromethane, 1,2-dichloroethane, dichlorobutane, 1,1,3-trichloroethane, trichlorocyclohexane, dichlorofluoroethane, trichloropropane, trichlorofluorooctane, dibromodifluorodecane, hexachloroethane and tetrachloroisooctane. Carbon tetrachloride and 1,1,3-trichloroethane are preferred aliphatic halohydrocarbons. Aromatic halohydrocarbons may also be employed, e.g., chlorobenzene, bromobenzene, dichlorobenzene, dichlorodibromobenzene, naphthyl chloride, chlorotoluene, dichlorotoluenes, and the like; chlorobenzene and dichlorobenzene are preferred aromatic halohydrocarbons. Chlorobenzene is the most preferred halohydrocarbon. 
     The halogenation normally proceeds under formation of a solid reaction product which may be isolated from the liquid reaction medium by filtration, decantation or another suitable method. It may be subsequently washed with an inert hydrocarbon diluent, such as n-hexane, isooctane or toluene, to remove any unreacted material, including physically absorbed halohydrocarbon. 
     The product is also contacted with a tetravalent titanium compound such as a dialkoxy-titanium dihalide, alkoxy-titanium trihalide, phenoxy-titanium trihalide or titanium tetrahalide. The most preferred titanium compounds are titanium tetrahalides and especially titanium tetrachloride. This treatment increases the chloride content in the solid catalyst component. This increase should preferably be sufficient to achieve a final chlorine atomic ratio of greater than 90% of the ionic equivalents of magnesium plus titanium present in the solid catalyst component. To this purpose the contacting with the tetravalent titanium compound is most suitably carried out at a temperature of from 60° to 136° C. during 0.1-6 hours, optionally in the presence of an inert hydrocarbon diluent. Particularly preferred contacting temperatures are from 70° to 120° C. and the most preferred contacting periods are in between 0.5 to 3.5 hours. The treatment may be carried out in successive contacts of the solid with separate portions of TiCl 4 . 
     After the treatment with tetravalent titanium compound the catalyst component is suitably isolated from the liquid reaction medium and washed to removed unreacted titanium compound. The titanium content of the final, washed catalyst constituent is suitably between about 1.5 to 3.6 percent by weight or up to about 4.5 percent. The preferred halogen atom, possibly contained in the magnesium compound to be halogenated, and contained in the titanium compound which serves as halogenating agent and in the tetravalent titanium compound with which the halogenated product is contacted, is chlorine. 
     The material used to wash the catalyst component is an inert, light hydrocarbon liquid. Preferred light hydrocarbon liquids are aliphatic, alicyclic and aromatic hydrocarbons. Examples of such liquids include isopentane, n-hexane, iso-octane and toluene, with iso-pentane being most preferred. The amount of light hydrocarbon liquid employed is 5 to 100 cc/gm of procatalyst in each of 2 to 6 separate washes, preferably about 25 cc/gm. The resulting solid component is the procatalyst, which is used with cocatalyst and selectivity control agent in the polymerization process. 
     The primary organoaluminum compound to be employed as cocatalyst may be chosen from any of the known activators in olefin polymerization catalyst systems comprising a titanium halide but is most suitably free of halogens. While aluminum trialkyl compounds, dialkylaluminum halides and dialkylaluminum alkoxides may be used, aluminumtrialkyl compounds are preferred, particularly those wherein each of the alkyl groups has 1 to 6 carbon atoms, e.g., aluminumtrimethyl, aluminumtriethyl, aluminumtri-n-propyl, aluminumtri-isobutyl, aluminumtriisopropyl and aluminumdibutyl-n-amyl. Preferred proportions of selectivity control agent, employed separately, in combination with, or reacted with an organoaluminum compound, calculated as mol per mol aluminum compound, are in the range from 1 to 100 particularly from 10 to 80. 
     The selectivity control agents which are necessary to achieve the advantages of the present invention are effectively unhindered heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen compounds. By &#34;effectively&#34; hindered it is meant that these compounds must be sterically or electronically hindered to a sufficient extent so that they will produce elastomeric, primarily syndiotactic polypropylene but it is important to note that when the selectivity control agents are not hindered to too great an extent mildly elastomeric isotactic polypropylene will be produced. 
     Generally, sufficient or &#34;effective&#34; hindrance is provided by a constituent group or groups which are attached to the carbon atoms located on either side of the nitrogen compound in the aromatic ring. Chloride or methyl groups, as in 2,6-lutidine, are of sufficient size to provide effective hindrance. For instance, I have found that, generally, hydrogen atoms, as in pyridine, and benzo groups, as in acridine, are insufficiently bulky so that they allow the production of such mildly elastomeric isotactic polymers (although benzo groups in combination with methyl groups, as in quinaldine, give syndiotactic polymer) and that tertiary butyl groups, as in 2,6-ditertbutylpyridine, are very bulky and thus allow the production of such mildly elastomeric isotactic polymers. It is theorized that if the substituent group is insufficiently bulky, the SCA acts as a severe poison and leads to the production of predominantly isotactic polymer. It is theorized that if the substituent group is too bulky, the electron donor will not undergo efficient binding to the catalytic system and thus will not provide any stereochemical control. 
     Among the compounds which are effective herein are the following: pyrazine, 2-picoline, 2,3,5-trimethylpyrazine, acridine, 3,4,5-trichloropyridazine, 1,3,5-triazine, phenazine, pyridine, ditertiarybutylpyridine, 2,6-dimethylpyrazine, quinazoline, 4,6-dichloropyrimidine, 2-methylpyrazine, 2,5-dimethylpyrazine, 2,3-dimethylpyrazine, 2,3-dichloroquinoxaline, quinoline, pyridazine, 1,10-phenantholine, 2,4-dichloropyrimidine and 2,6-diphenylpyridine. 
     To prepare the final polymerization catalyst composition, procatalyst, cocatalyst and selectivity control agent may be simply combined, most suitably employing a molar ratio to produce in the final catalyst an atomic ratio of aluminum to titanium of from 1 to 150, and suitably from about 10 to about 150. Increasing the Al:Ti ratio tends to slightly increase catalyst activity at the expense of increased catalyst residue in the unextracted product. These factors will be considered in selecting the Al:Ti ratio for any given process and desired product. In general, Al:Ti ratios in the range of 30:1 to 100:1 and especially of about 50:1 to 80:1 will be found advantageous. An SCA:Ti ratio of about 10:1 to 100:1 may be used. 
     Polymerization of propylene may be conducted with the catalysts of the invention in a liquid system with an inert diluent such as a paraffinic liquid of 3 to 15 carbon atoms per molecule, or in a liquid system containing propylene as sole diluent or together with a small amount of propane, or in vapor phase. Propylene polymerization in liquid phase is conducted at a temperature of 50° to 80° C. and at a pressure sufficient to maintain liquid conditions. In a continuous reaction system, the liquid in the reaction zone is maintained at reaction conditions, monomer is continuously charged to the reaction zone, catalyst components are also charged continuously or at frequent intervals to the reaction zone, and reaction mixture containing polymer is withdrawn from the reaction zone continuously or at frequent intervals. 
     In propylene polymerization, the reaction mixture is typically maintained at conditions at which the polymer is produced as a slurry in the reaction mixture. The catalyst systems of this invention are extremely active and highly specific in propylene polymerization, so that no removal of catalyst components or of atactic polymer from the polymer product is required. 
     While the catalysts of this invention are particularly adapted for use in continuous polymerization systems, they may, of course, also be employed in batch polymerization. This may be of advantage in a multi-stage polymerization in which propylene polymers and propyleneethylene polymers are produced in separate reaction zones arranged in sequence. 
     It is well known that supported coordination procatalysts and catalyst systems of the type used herein are highly sensitive, in varying degrees, to catalyst poisons such as moisture, oxygen, carbon oxides, polyolefins, acetylenic compounds and sulfur compounds. It will be understood that in the practice of this invention, as well as in the following examples, both the equipment and the reagents and diluents are carefully dried and free of potential catalyst poisons. 
     The productivity of the procatalyst is determined as kg polymer/g procatalyst in a standard one hour batch reaction; it may also be expressed as kg polymer/g Ti. Catalyst activity is sometimes reported as kg polymer/g procatalyst or Ti/hr. 
     The specificity towards production of isotactic polymer and towards average block length is determined by measurements involving the penteds observed in the  13  C NMR spectrum. A relationship has been determined such that the average block length may be estimated by measuring the amount of xylene soluble polymer (XS) in accordance with regulations of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. The XS test is carried out as follows: The sample is completely dissolved in xylene in a stirred flask by heating at 120° C. The flask is then immersed in a water bath at 25° C. without stirring for one hour, during which the insoluble portion precipitates. The precipitate is filtered off and the Solubles present in the filtrate are determined by evaporating a 20 ml aliquot of the filtrate, drying the residue under vacuum, and weighing the residue. The xylene-solubles increases for short block length material and may include some amorphous and low molecular weight crystalline material. (FDA regulations 121.2501 and 121.2510, 1971). The desirable numerical value of XS for the propylene homopolymers of this invention is typically between about 35% and about 85%. 
     PREPARATION OF PROCATALYSTS USED IN THIS INVENTION 
     Magnesium methoxide solution (12%) was prepared by dissolving magnesium metal in methanol containing 0.125 equivalent of tetraethoxy silane (TEOS) and then filtering through a medium porosity fritted glass filter to remove the slight amount of grey suspension. 
     The magnesium methoxide solution (791 g, 1.10 mol) was added slowly, at 60° C., to a solution of resorcinol (60.5 g, 0.55 mol) in methanol (175 g) while stirring at 450 rpm with a 3 inch wide, curved teflon paddle of 1.5 in 2  surface area. By the time 1/3 of the methoxide had been added the flocculant precipitate had gotten quite viscous so another 155 g of methanol was added. After addition was complete the reaction was stirred for an hour then filtered. The solids were washed with methanol then isooctane then dried under moving nitrogen to yield crystalline cylindrical rods of formula: Mg 4  (OCH 3 ) 6  (CH 3  OH) 10  (resorcinolate) 2 . Partial desolvation of this precursor was carried out by boiling 40 g of solids in 300 g of cyclohexane, containing 120 g of tetraethoxysilane, until the volume had decreased by 20-30%. 
     The procatalyst was prepared by stirring 7.8 g of the partially desolvated precursor in 200 ml of a 50/50 (vol/vol) mixture of TiCl  4  /chlorobenzene. After adding isobutylphthalate (2.5 ml, 8.7 mmol) the mixture was heated in an oil bath and stirred at 115° C. for 60 minutes. The mixture was filtered hot and the solids slurried in 200 ml of fresh TiCl 4  /chlorobenzene mixture. Phthaloyl chloride (0.5 ml, 3.4 mmol) and p-toluoyl chloride (0.5 ml, 3.7 mmol) were added and the mixture stirred at 115° C. After 60 minutes the mixture was filtered hot and the solids slurried again into 200 ml of fresh TiCl 4  /chlorobenzene mixture, heated at 115° C. for 30 min and filtered hot. The solids were then slurried into 100 ml of fresh TiCl 4  /chlorobenzene mixture, heated at 115° C. for 10 minutes and filtered hot. The solids were allowed to cool then washed with six 150 ml portions of isopentane and dried for 100 minutes under moving nitrogen at 40° C. Ti=2.54%. 
    
    
     EXAMPLES 1-13 
     The triethylaluminum cocatalyst was used as a 0.28 molar solution in isooctane. 0.20 millimoles of the selectivity control agent, 0.01 mmol of the procatalyst and 0.7 mmol of the cocatalyst were mixed together and after 20 minutes were injected into 2700 milliliters of liquid propylene in a reactor where the polymerizations were carried out for 90 minutes at 60° C. 
       13  C Magnetic Resonance 
     Spectra were obtained at 135° C. on samples dissolved in 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene. The spectrum reference was the mmmm methyl group assigned at 21.68 ppm. The calculated results of % syndiotactic, % isotactic, % defective and the respective average block lengths, for the boiling isooctane fractionated polymer are shown in Tables 1 and 2. 
     Pentad Analysis 
     The pented analyses for the examples were carried out utilizing the following formulae: ##EQU1## 
     Tensile Properties 
     In order to prepare samples for tensile measurements, about 60 g of the polymer was blended in a Brabender mixer at 190° C. with 0.3 g of Irganox 1010 antioxidant. After cooling, a 6&#34;×6&#34;×2mm plate was compression molded at 204° C. under 5 tons pressure. Tensile bars were then cut from the plate using a `C` die. The measurement conditions are as described in ASTM D 412-83. Roughly: Tensile set is the residual elongation imparted to a sample after stretching to an increase of 300% over its original length at a rate of 20 inches/minute and then allowing it to recover to zero load at that same rate. Tensile yield is the stress required to induce a permanent deformation in the sample. Tensile at break is the stress required to break the sample at an elongation rate of 20 inches/minute. Elongation at break is the measured elongation at the break condition. 
     Melt flow index was determined under condition L (2160 g, 230° C.) on a Tinius Olsen Plastometer. The strands, which were formed by extrusion through the 3 mm die of the melt flow device, were stretched to an equilibrated length by hand pulling to nearly the break point several times. The diameter of the stretched strand is reported as the average of several measurements along the length of the strand. The elasticity of the polymer is reported as the percentage elongation obtained upon applying a force nearly enough to break the strand (after which, of course, the strand returns to its equilibrated length). This measurement is essentially equivalent to the reversible elastic elongation described by G. Natta and G. Crespi in U.S. Pat. No. 3,175,999. 
     The analytical results of these experiments are shown in Table 1 set forth below. The table gives the percentage of isotactic and syndiotactic content as determined by  13  C NMR analysis as well as the xylene soluble percentage in the polymer produced. Since each of these polymers contains significant amounts of both isotactic and syndiotactic blocks, I have included the average isotactic block length (L iso ), the average syndiotactic block length (L syn ) and an average crystalline block length (L ave ) which is the weighted average of the other two. In each case (Examples 2-7), the polymer made according to the present invention contains a larger percentage of isotactic material than syndiotactic material and the residual stretch values (a measure of elasticity) are less than 50%, indicating polymers which are relatively stiff and only mildly elastomeric, and the xylene solubles contents are less than 50%. 
     Comparative examples 8-13 show the results of identical catalyst preparations and polymerizations which were performed with heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen compounds which were effectively hindered within the meaning of this invention. In other words, aromatic nitrogen compounds in which there is substitution adjacent to the nitrogen atom in the ring in which the substituent group was bulky enough to provide effective hindrance but not too bulky. Table 2 gives the results of the polymerizations which were performed under the same conditions as specified in examples 8-13. 
     Example 2 shows that by removing a methyl group from the position adjacent the nitrogen and replacing it with a hydrogen atom, one greatly increases the percent of isotactic material versus the results of examples 8 and 11. The same thing is true of example 3 when compared to examples 9 and 13 and also example 4 when compared to example 10. In example 5, a methyl group was removed and replaced by a benzo group and the percent isotactic greatly increased over examples 10 and 12. The same is true of example 6 as compared to examples 8 and 13. In example 7, a methyl group was replaced by a bulky tertiary butyl group and the amount of isotactic material greatly increased as compared to examples 8, 11 and 13. The polymer made in example 1 was sticky. 
     It can be seen in each case that the xylene solubles content of the polymer produced in Examples 2-7 is much lower than the xylene solubles content of the polymers produced according to examples 8-14 and also that in each case the isotactic content of the polymer produced is higher than the syndiotactic content. Also, the average block lengths are longer in the polymers produced herein in Examples 2-7 than those produced in Examples 8-13. The residual stretch numbers are all 30% or lower indicating that these polymers are only mildly elastomeric. 
     Table 3 shows the tensile properties for some of the polymers produced with the above heterocyclic aromatic nitrogen compounds both effectively and non-effectively hindered. It can be seen that the significantly higher tensile set values (Tset) distinguish the polymers produced via mediation of the above described effectively unhindered nitrogen heterocycles as definitely less elastomeric in nature than the polymers of the comparative examples. 
     
                                           TABLE 1                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
(Less Hindered Heterocycles)                                              
                                    X.S.                                  
Example                                                                   
     Compare to                                                           
           SCA     % Syn                                                  
                       Lsyn                                               
                          % iso                                           
                              Liso                                        
                                 Lave                                     
                                    (%)                                   
                                       Stretch                            
__________________________________________________________________________
1    All   None    22  6.7                                                
                          60  14 12.0                                     
                                    42.4                                  
                                       20%                                
2    6,9   2-picoline                                                     
                   19  6.3                                                
                          62  14 12.2                                     
                                    49.4                                  
                                        9%                                
3    7,11  quinoline                                                      
                   21  6.7                                                
                          61  15 12.9                                     
                                    44.4                                  
                                       14%                                
4    8     2,3,5-trimethyl                                                
                   12  6.9                                                
                          77  25 22.6                                     
                                    23.1                                  
                                       10%                                
           pyrazine                                                       
5    10,8  phenazine                                                      
                   21  7.0                                                
                          62.5                                            
                              17 14.5                                     
                                    36.4                                  
                                       14%                                
6    11,6  acridine                                                       
                   18  6.8                                                
                          64  17 14.8                                     
                                    31.0                                  
                                       21%                                
7    6,9,13                                                               
           di-tertbutyl-                                                  
                   28  7.5                                                
                          56  15 12.5                                     
                                    44.7                                  
                                       30%                                
           pyridine                                                       
__________________________________________________________________________
 
    
     
                                           TABLE 2                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
(Hindered heterocycles)                                                   
Example                                                                   
     SCA       % Syn                                                      
                   Lsyn                                                   
                      % Iso                                               
                          Liso                                            
                             Lave                                         
                                X.S.                                      
                                   Stretch                                
__________________________________________________________________________
 8   2,6-Lutidine                                                         
               54.5                                                       
                   8.7                                                    
                      25  10 9.1                                          
                                67.6                                      
                                   68%                                    
 9   Quinaldine                                                           
               52  8.9                                                    
                      27  12 10.0                                         
                                62.4                                      
                                   110%                                   
10   2,3,5,6-Tetramethyl-                                                 
               50  7.7                                                    
                      25   9 8.1                                          
                                79.1                                      
                                   80%                                    
     pyrazine                                                             
11   2,4,6-Collidine                                                      
               49  8.8                                                    
                      30  10 9.3                                          
                                69.1                                      
                                   113%                                   
12   2,3-dimethyl-                                                        
               45  8.0                                                    
                      34  13 10.2                                         
                                61.4                                      
                                   58%                                    
     quinoxaline                                                          
13   2,4-dimethyl-                                                        
               42  8.4                                                    
                      37  13 10.6                                         
                                61.3                                      
                                   78%                                    
     quinoline                                                            
__________________________________________________________________________
 
    
     
                       TABLE 3                                                     
______________________________________                                    
Tensile Properties                                                        
                        Tyield                                            
                              Tbreak                                      
                                    Elong @ break                         
Ex.            Tset*    (psi) (psi) (%)                                   
______________________________________                                    
2     Iso      171%     1289  2402  843                                   
6     Iso      204%     1529  2893  785                                   
8     Compar    65%     730   1554  750                                   
9     Compar    73%     822   1845  769                                   
10    Compar    52%     587   1114  908                                   
11    Compar   110%     980   1651  764                                   
______________________________________                                    
 *Stretch to 400% of original length.                                     
 
    
     Using two different less hindered heterocyclic SCAs, which are the subject of this invention, and one hindered heterocycle as a comparative example, 1.8 liters of 1-butene was polymerized under the same conditions used above for propylene polymerizations. The NMR results presented in Table 4 show that the less hindered SCAs (Ex. 14 and Ex. 15) produce predominantly isotactic polybutylene while the methyl hindered SCA (Ex. 16) produces primarily syndiotactactic polybutylene. 
     
                       TABLE 4                                                     
______________________________________                                    
Polybutylene                                                              
                     %            %                                       
Example SCA          Iso   &lt;Liso&gt; Syn  &lt;Lsyn&gt;                             
______________________________________                                    
14      2,3,5-trimethyl-                                                  
                     51    12     19   5.9                                
        pyrazine                                                          
15      cyanuric chloride                                                 
                     68    18     12   5.6                                
Compara-                                                                  
        2,6-lutidine 27    10     38   6.9                                
tive: 16                                                                  
______________________________________                                    
 
    
     The tensile properties of these examples are shown in Table 5. As with the polypropylene case the polybutenes of the present invention exhibit higher tensile strength and higher tensile set values than the polymer of the more hindered nitrogen heterocycle (i.e. they are only mildly elastomeric). 
     
                       TABLE 5                                                     
______________________________________                                    
Polybutene Tensiles                                                       
Example  Tensile set                                                      
                   Tensile at break                                       
                               Elongation at break                        
______________________________________                                    
14       100%      974     psi   590%                                     
15       158%      2852    psi   480%                                     
Comparative:                                                              
          30%      &gt;230    psi*  &gt;1000%                                   
16                                                                        
______________________________________                                    
 *Sample did not break at 1000% elongation.