Patent Publication Number: US-2009226474-A1

Title: Antibodies as T cell receptor mimics, methods of production and uses thereof

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. Ser. No. 60/936,050, filed Jun. 18, 2007. This application is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 11/809,895, filed Jun. 1, 2007; which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of U.S. Ser. No. 60/810,079, filed Jun. 1, 2006. Said application U.S. Ser. No. 11/809,895 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 11/517,516, filed Sep. 7, 2006; which claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) of provisional applications U.S. Ser. No. 60/714,621, filed Sep. 7, 2005; U.S. Ser. No. 60/751,542, filed Dec. 19, 2005; U.S. Ser. No. 60/752,737, filed Dec. 20, 2005; and U.S. Ser. No. 60/838,276, filed Aug. 17, 2006. Said application U.S. Ser. No. 11/517,516 is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 11/140,644, filed May 27, 2005; which claims benefit under 35U.S.C. 119(e) of provisional applications U.S. Ser. No. 60/374,857, filed May 27, 2004; U.S. Ser. No. 60/640,020, filed Dec. 28, 2004; U.S. Ser. No. 60/646,338, filed Jan. 24, 2005; and U.S. Ser. No. 60/673,296, filed Apr. 20, 2005. The entire contents of each of the above-referenced patents and patent applications are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference. 
    
    
     STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT 
     The government owns certain rights in the present invention pursuant to a grant from the Advanced Technology Program of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (Grant #70NANB4H3048). 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention relates generally to a methodology of producing antibodies that recognize peptides associated with a tumorigenic or disease state, wherein the peptides are displayed in the context of HLA molecules. These antibodies will mimic the specificity of a T cell receptor (TCR) such that the molecules may be used as therapeutic, diagnostic and research reagents. 
     2. Description of the Background Art 
     Class I major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules, designated HLA class I in humans, bind and display peptide antigen ligands upon the cell surface. The peptide antigen ligands presented by the class I MHC molecule are derived from either normal endogenous proteins (“self”) or foreign proteins (“nonself”) introduced into the cell. Nonself proteins may be products of malignant transformation or intracellular pathogens such as viruses. In this manner, class I MHC molecules convey information regarding the internal milieu of a cell to immune effector cells including but not limited to, CD8 +  cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), which are activated upon interaction with “nonself” peptides, thereby lysing or killing the cell presenting such “nonself” peptides. 
     Class II MHC molecules, designated HLA class II in humans, also bind and display peptide antigen ligands upon the cell surface. Unlike class I MHC molecules which are expressed on virtually all nucleated cells, class II MHC molecules are normally confined to specialized cells, such as B lymphocytes, macrophages, dendritic cells, and other antigen presenting cells which take up foreign antigens from the extracellular fluid via an endocytic pathway. The peptides they bind and present are derived from extracellular foreign antigens, such as products of bacteria that multiply outside of cells, wherein such products include protein toxins secreted by the bacteria that often have deleterious and even lethal effects on the host (e.g., human). In this manner, class II molecules convey information regarding the fitness of the extracellular space in the vicinity of the cell displaying the class II molecule to immune effector cells, including but not limited to, CD4 +  helper T cells, thereby helping to eliminate such pathogens. The extermination of such pathogens is accomplished by both helping B cells make antibodies against microbes, as well as toxins produced by such microbes, and by activating macrophages to destroy ingested microbes. 
     Class I and class II HLA molecules exhibit extensive polymorphism generated by systematic recombinatorial and point mutation events during cell differentiation and maturation resulting from allelic diversity of the parents; as such, hundreds of different HLA types exist throughout the world&#39;s population, resulting in a large immunological diversity. Such extensive HLA diversity throughout the population is the root cause of tissue or organ transplant rejection between individuals as well as of differing individual susceptibility and/or resistance to infectious diseases. HLA molecules also contribute significantly to autoimmunity and cancer. 
     Class I MHC molecules alert the immune response to disorders within host cells. Peptides which are derived from viral- and tumor-specific proteins within the cell are loaded into the class I molecule&#39;s antigen binding groove in the endoplasmic reticulum of the cell and subsequently carried to the cell surface. Once the class I MHC molecule and its loaded peptide ligand are on the cell surface, the class I molecule and its peptide ligand are accessible to cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). CTLs survey the peptides presented by the class I molecule and destroy those cells harboring ligands derived from infectious or neoplastic agents within that cell. 
     While specific CTL targets have been identified, little is known about the breadth and nature of ligands presented on the surface of a diseased cell. From a basic scientific perspective, many outstanding questions remain in the art regarding peptide presentation. For instance, it has been demonstrated that a virus can preferentially block expression of HLA class I molecules from a given locus while leaving expression at other loci intact. Similarly, there are numerous reports of cancerous cells that downregulate the expression of class I HLA at particular loci. However, there is no data describing how (or if) the classical HLA class I loci differ in the peptides they bind. It is therefore unclear how class I molecules from the different loci vary in their interaction with viral- and tumor-derived ligands and the number of peptides each will present. 
     Discerning virus- and tumor-specific ligands for CTL recognition is an important component of vaccine design. Ligands unique to tumorigenic or infected cells can be tested and incorporated into vaccines designed to evoke a protective CTL response. Several methodologies are currently employed to identify potentially protective peptide ligands. One approach uses T cell lines or clones to screen for biologically active ligands among chromatographic fractions of eluted peptides (Cox et al., 1994). This approach has been employed to identify peptide ligands specific to cancerous cells. A second technique utilizes predictive algorithms to identify peptides capable of binding to a particular class I molecule based upon previously determined motif and/or individual ligand sequences (De Groot et al., 2001); however, there have been reports describing discrepancies between these algorithms and empirical data. Peptides having high predicted probability of binding from a pathogen of interest can then be synthesized and tested for T cell reactivity in various assays, such as but not limited to, precursor, tetramer and ELISpot assays. 
     Many cancer cells display tumor-specific peptide-HLA complexes derived from processing of inappropriately expressed or overexpressed proteins, called tumor associated antigens (TAAs) (Bernhard et al., 1996; Baxevanis et al., 2006; and Andersen et al., 2003). With the discovery of mAb technology, it was believed that “magic bullets” could be developed which specifically target malignant cells for destruction. Current strategies for the development of tumor specific antibodies rely on creating monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to TAAs displayed as intact proteins on the surface of malignant cells. Though targeting surface tumor antigens has resulted in the development of several successful anti-tumor antibodies (Herceptin and Rituxan), a significant number of patients (up to 70%) are refractory to treatment with these antibody molecules. This has raised several questions regarding the rationale for targeting whole molecules displayed on the tumor cell surface for developing cancer therapeutic reagents. First, antibody-based therapies directed at surface antigens are often associated with lower than expected killing efficiency of tumor cells. Free tumor antigens shed from the surface of the tumor occupy the binding sites of the anti-tumor specific antibody, thereby reducing the number of active molecules and resulting in decreased tumor cell death. Second, current mAb molecules do not recognize many potential cancer antigens because these antigens are not expressed as an intact protein on the surface of tumor cells. The tumor suppressor protein p53 is a good example. p53 and similar intracellular tumor associated proteins are normally processed within the cell into peptides which are then presented in the context of either HLA class I or class II molecules on the surface of the tumor cell. Native antibodies are not generated against peptide-HLA complexes. Third, many of the antigens recognized by antibodies are heterogenic by nature, which limits the effectiveness of an antibody to a single tumor histology. For these reasons it is apparent that antibodies generated against surface expressed tumor antigens may not be optimal therapeutic targets for cancer immunotherapy. 
     The majority of proteins produced by a cell reside within intracellular compartments, thus preventing their direct recognition by antibody molecules. The abundance of intracellular proteins that is available for degradation by proteasome-dependent and independent mechanisms yields an enormous source of peptides for surface presentation in the context of the MHC class I system (Rock et al., 2004). A new class of antibodies that specifically recognizes HLA-restricted peptide targets (epitopes) on the surface of cancer cells would significantly expand the therapeutic repertoire if it could be shown that they have anti-tumor properties which could lead to tumor cell death. 
     Many T cell epitopes (specific peptide-HLA complexes) are common to a broad range of tumors which have originated from several distinct tissues. The primary goal of epitope discovery has been to identify peptide (tumor antigens) for use in the construction of vaccines that activate a clinically relevant cellular immune response against the tumor cells. The goal of vaccination in cancer immunotherapy is to elicit a cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) response and activate T helper responses to eliminate the tumor. Although many of the epitopes discovered by current methods are immunogenic, shown by studies that generate peptide-specific CTL in vitro and in vivo, the application of vaccination protocols to cancer treatment has not been highly successful. This is especially true for cancer vaccines that target self-antigens (“normal” proteins that are overexpressed in the malignant cells). Although this class of antigens may not be ideal for vaccine formulation due to an individual “tolerance” of self antigens, they still represent good targets for eliciting antibodies ex vivo. 
     The value of monoclonal antibodies which recognize peptide-MHC complexes has been recognized by others (see for example Reiter, US Publication No. US 2004/0191260 A1, filed Mar. 26, 2003; Andersen et al., US Publication No. US 2002/0150914 A1, filed Sep. 19, 2001; Hoogenboom et al., US Publication No. US 2003/0223994 A1, filed Feb. 20, 2003; and Reiter et al., PCT Publication No. WO 03/068201 A2, filed Feb. 11, 2003). However, these processes employ the use of phage display libraries that do not produce a whole, ready-to-use antibody product. The majority of these antibodies were isolated from bacteriophage libraries as Fab fragments (Cohen et al., 2003; Held et al., 2004; and Chames et al., 2000) and have not been examined for anti-tumor activity since they do not activate innate immune mechanisms (e.g., complement-dependent cytotoxicity [CDC]) or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC). Demonstration of anti-tumor activity is critical as therapeutic mAbs are thought to act through several mechanisms which engage the innate response, including antibody or complement-mediated phagocytosis by macrophage, CDC and ADCC (Liu et al., 2004; Prang et al., 2005; Akewanlop et al., 2001; Clynes et al., 2000; and Masui et al., 1986). These prior art methods also have not demonstrated production of antibodies capable of staining tumor cells in a robust manner, implying that they are of low affinity or specificity. The immunogen employed in the prior art methods uses MHC which has been “enriched” for one particular peptide, and therefore such immunogen contains a pool of peptide-MHC complexes and is not loaded solely with the peptide of interest. In addition, there has not been a concerted effort in these prior art methods to maintain the structure of the three dimensional epitope formed by the peptide/HLA complex, which is essential for generation of the appropriate antibody response. For these reasons, immunization protocols presented in these prior art references had to be carried out over long periods of time (i.e., approximately 5 months or longer). 
     Therefore, there exists a need in the art for diagnostic and therapeutic antibodies with novel recognition specificity for peptide-HLA domain in complexes present on the surface of tumor or diseased/infected cells. The presently claimed and disclosed invention provides innovative processes for creating antibody molecules endowed with unique antigen recognition specificities for peptide-HLA complexes, and the present invention recognizes that these peptide-HLA molecules are unique sources of tumor/disease/infection specific antigens available as therapeutic targets. In addition, the development of this technology will provide new tools to detect, visualize, quantify, and study antigen (peptide-HLA) presentation in tumors or diseased/infected cells. Antibodies with T cell receptor-like specificity of the present invention enable the measurement of antigen presentation on tumors or diseased/infected cells by direct visualization. Previous studies attempting to visualize peptide-HLA complexes using a soluble TCR found that the poor affinity of the TCR made it difficult to consistently detect low levels of target on tumor cells (Weidanz, 2000). Therefore, in addition to being used as targeting agents, TCRm of the present invention serve as valuable tools to obtain information regarding the presence, expression pattern, and distribution of the target peptide-HLA complex antigens on the tumor surface and in tumor metastasis. 
    
    
     
       DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawing(s) will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee. 
         FIG. 1  illustrates size exclusion chromatography on a Sephadex S-75 column of a mixture of refolded heavy and light (β2m) chains of HLA-A2 with synthetic peptide (LLGRNSFEV; SEQ ID NO:1). Peptide-HLA-A2 folded monomers were prepared and purified using S-75 size exclusion chromatography. Monomers consisting of peptide-HLA-A2 were prepared by mixing heavy chain (1 μM) together with beta-2 microglobulin (2 μM) and 10 mg of the desired peptide in buffer (1 L) optimized to facilitate folding of conformationally correct peptide loaded HLA complexes. After 3 days of folding, the sample is concentrated 100-fold to 10 mL using an Amicon concentrator. The concentrated sample was filtered through a 0.2 μm filter (Millipore) and purified by FPLC (Pharmacia) chromatography using an S-75 size exclusion column (Pharmacia). The sample was applied to the column and washed at 2 mL/min with buffer (PBS pH 7.4).  FIG. 1  shows the typical chromatogram profile for the purification of refolded peptide-HLA-A2 monomer. In this  FIG. 5  peaks are seen, which are marked as aggregates, refolded monomer, HLA-A2 heavy chain, beta2-microglobulin, and peptide alone. A typical purification will yield 8 to 12 mg of peptide-HLA-A2 monomer. After collecting the desired fractions (generally in 50 mL) the sample is concentrated to approximately 5 mL using an Amicon concentrator and biotinylated with biotin ligase following standard procedures (Avidity, Colo.). The biotin labeled monomer was isolated using the same approach as described above (data not shown). The biotin labeled material may then be used for making tetramers as described in  FIG. 2 . 
         FIG. 2  illustrates preparation and purification of peptide-HLA tetramer using size exclusion chromatography on a Sephadex S-200 column of the multimerized refolded monomer peak of  FIG. 1 . To form tetramers of peptide-HLA-A2, biotin labeled monomer was mixed with streptavidin at either 4:1 or 8:1 molar ratios. The precise ratio was determined for each peptide-HLA preparation and was based on the ratio of the two proteins which generates the largest amount of tetramer band as determined by gel shift assays by SDS-PAGE. Generally, 8 mg of biotin labeled monomer was used, and after mixing with the appropriate amount of streptavidin, the sample (usually in 5 to 10 mL) was applied to the S-200 column for purification by FPLC.  FIG. 2  shows the chromatogram profile for a typical tetramer purification run on an S-200 column, and as shown, 4 peaks are present which represent tetramer, trimer, dimer and monomer forms of the peptide-HLA-A2 complex. 3 and 4 mg of purified tetramer was routinely produced. 
         FIG. 3  illustrates the stability of the 264 peptide-HLA-A2 tetramers. Tetramer stability was assessed in mouse serum at 4° C. and 37° C. 25 μg of 264 peptide-tetramer complex was added to 5 mL of 100% mouse serum and incubated at 4° C. and 37° C. for 75 hr. At designated times, 50 μL aliquots of sample were removed and stored at −20° C. and remained frozen until completion of the experiment. To determine the integrity of the peptide-HLA tetramer, samples were evaluated using a sandwich ELISA and two antibodies, BB7.2 and W6/32 that bind only conformationally intact peptide-HLA tetramers. An ELISA protocol was developed using 96-well plates (Nunc maxisorb plates) that were coated overnight (O/N) at 4° C. with 0.5 μg of BB7.2, washed with buffer (PBS/0.05% Tween-20) and then blocked with 200 μl of 5% milk for 1 hr at room temperature. Sample (50 μL) from each time point was assayed in duplicate wells, incubated for 1 hr at room temperature and washed; then, 50 μL of a 1:1000 dilution of biotin conjugated W6/32 antibody was added to each well and incubated for 1 hr at room temperature. To detect bound antibody, the streptavidin-HRP (horseradish peroxidase) conjugate was added to wells at 1:500 dilution, incubated for 15 minutes and washed; the assay was then developed using ABTS substrate. All sample signals were plotted as % of control. Control tetramer was added to serum, mixed, and immediately removed for assaying by ELISA. The stability half-life for the 264-peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer at 4° C. was greater than 72 hrs, while at 37° C. the stability half-life was approximately 10 hrs. 
         FIG. 4  illustrates the complete structure of the peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer immunogen, as obtained from the tetramer peak of  FIG. 2 , and recognition of the peptide-HLA epitope by a TCR mimic. 
         FIG. 5  illustrates the development of an ELISA assay to screen mouse bleeds to determine if there are antibodies specific to the peptide-of-interest-HLA-molecule complex present. The schematic illustrates two newly developed screening assays for detection of anti-peptide-HLA specific antibodies from immunized mouse serum. Assay #2 evolved from Assay #1. 
         FIG. 6  illustrates the results from an ELISA of 6 individual bleeds from Balb/c mice immunized with tetramers of 264 peptide-HLA-A2, using assay format #2 as described in  FIG. 5 . Mice (male and female Balb/c; 13 and 12 groups, respectively) were immunized 4 times every 2 weeks by subcutaneous injection in the region behind the head or in the side flanks with 100 μl containing 50 μg of 264 peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer and 25 μg of QuilA (adjuvant). Bleeds were taken at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and just prior to sacrificing the mice.  FIG. 6  shows screening results from mice sera after 3 immunizations (week 5). Detection of polyclonal antibodies reactive for 264 peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer was carried out by ELISA (assay #2 described in  FIG. 5 ). The ELISA results demonstrate that a 264 peptide-HLA-A2 antibody response can be elicited in both male (13M1-M3) and female (12M1-M3) mice using the immunization protocol and screening assay of the presently disclosed and claimed invention. 
         FIG. 7  illustrates development of cell-based direct and competitive binding assays for screening mouse bleeds for antibodies specific to the peptide-of-interest-HLA-molecule complex. The schematic illustrates two newly developed cell-based screening assays for detection of anti-peptide-HLA specific antibodies from immunized mouse serum. Two cell based assays were developed: Assay #3 is a Cell-based direct binding approach and Assay #4 is a Cell-based competitive binding approach which uses soluble monomer or tetramer peptide-HLA-A2 complexes as competitors and non-competitors. The sensitivity of Assay # 4 is much greater than Assay #3. 
         FIG. 8  illustrates peptide loading of T2 cells. T2 cells (HLA-A2 + , TAP deficient) were stained with BB7 antibody (specific for properly folded HLA-A2, ATCC #HB-82) to demonstrate that addition of exogenous peptide increased the surface expression of the HLA-A2 molecule. 5×10 5  T2 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μg of either 264 or eIF4G peptide for 6 hours at 37° C., washed and stained with 0.5 μg BB7.2 for 20 min. Negative control cells were not pulsed with peptide. After staining, the reaction was washed once with 3-4 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences). Peptide pulsed T2 cells (open traces) shifted significantly to the right when stained, indicating the presence of HLA-A2 molecules on the surface, while unpulsed cells did not. 
         FIG. 9  illustrates an example of the cell-based direct binding assay of  FIG. 7 , and contains the results of staining of 264 peptide-loaded T2 cells with the 13M2 mouse bleed. T2 cells (HLA-A2 + , TAP deficient) were stained with preabsorbed, diluted serum from mouse 13M2 (immunized with 264 tetramers) to demonstrate that antibodies exist in the serum which are specific for the 264p-HLA-A2 complex. 5×10 5  T2 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μg of either 264 or eIF4G peptide for 6 hours at 37° C., washed and stained with 100 μl of a 1:200 dilution of preabsorbed sera for 20 min. After staining, the reaction was washed once with 3-4 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences). 264 peptide-pulsed T2 cells (open trace) shifted significantly to the right of the eIF4G peptide pulsed T2s when stained, indicating the presence of 264p-HLA-A2 specific antibodies from immunized mice. 
         FIG. 10  illustrates that pre-bleed samples (mice bleeds taken prior to immunization) show no sign of reactivity to T2 cells pulsed with either the 264- or eIF4G peptides. T2 cells (HLA-A2 + , TAP deficient) were stained with diluted serum from mouse C3M4 (unimmunized) to demonstrate that antibodies do not preexist in the serum which are specific for the 264p-HLA-A2 complex. 5×10 5 T2 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μg of either 264 or eIF4G peptide for 6 hours at 37° C., washed and stained with 100 μl of a 1:200 dilution of sera for 20 min. After staining the reaction was washed once with 3-4 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences). 264 peptide-pulsed T2 cells (filled trace) and eIF4G peptide pulsed T2s (open trace) did not shift significantly from the origin when stained, indicating the absence of any HLA-A2 specific antibodies in the mouse&#39;s serum. 
         FIG. 11  depicts development of assays to screen hybridomas to determine if they are producing anti-HLA-peptide specific antibodies. The schematic illustrates two ELISA-based screening assays for detection of anti-peptide-HLA specific monoclonal antibodies from culture supernatant. Assay #1 is an ELISA-based direct binding approach that coats wells of a 96-well plate with 0.5 μg of either specific or irrelevant tetramer. Hybridoma cell culture supernatant (50 μL) was assayed in duplicate by addition to an antibody coated plate blocked with 5% milk for 1 hr at room temperature. Plates were incubated for 1 hr at room temperature, washed, and probed with goat anti-mouse-HRP for 30 minutes. The assay was developed by adding 50 μL of either TMB or ABTS and read at 450 or 405 nm, respectively. Assay #2 is an ELISA that uses a competitive binding approach in which cell culture supernatant is incubated in the presence of either 300 ng of competitor or non-competitor (soluble monomer or tetramer peptide-HLA-A2 complexes) in wells on 96-well plates that have been coated with 100 ng of specific peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer and blocked with 5% milk. After 1 hr incubation, the plate is washed, probed with goat anti-mouse HRP and developed using TMB or ABTS. 
         FIG. 12  illustrates a competitive ELISA assay for evaluation of individual hybridomas (13M1) reactive against 264p-HLA-A2 complexes. Light grey bar=addition of 264p-HLA-A2 tetramer (competitor, 0.3 μg); Dark grey bar=addition of eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramer (non-competitor, 0.3 μg). Hybridoma cell culture supernatant (50 μL) was incubated in the presence of 300 ng of competitor (264 peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer) or non-competitor (eIF4G peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer) in wells on a 96-well plate coated previously with 100 ng of 264 peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer. After 1 hr incubation, the plate was washed, probed with goat anti-mouse HRP, developed using TMB or ABTS and read at 450 or 405 nm, respectively. Results were calculated by dividing the absorbance read in the presence of non-competitor by the absorbance read in the presence of competitor [eIF4G/264]. Ratios of 2 or greater were considered to be positive, and hybridoma clones with this desired ratio were selected for further analysis.  FIG. 12  shows 4 different hybridoma supernatants (M1/3-A5, M1/3-F11, M1/4-G3, and M1/6-A12) with a specific binding ratio [eIF4G/264] of 2 or greater. 
         FIG. 13  illustrates the results of a competitive ELISA assay for evaluation of individual hybridomas to determine if the hybridoma produced from mouse bleed 13M1 expresses anti-264-HLA-A2 antibodies. Hybridoma cell culture supernatant (50 μL) was incubated without any tetramer addition or in the presence of 300 ng of competitor (264 peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer) or non-competitor (eIF4G peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer) in wells on a 96-well plate coated previously with 100 ng of 264 peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer. After 1 hr incubation, the plate was washed, probed with goat anti-mouse HRP, developed using TMB or ABTS and read at 450 or 405 nm, respectively.  FIG. 13  illustrates three different hybridoma supernatants with favorable eIF4G/264 ratios. These include M1-1F8, M1-2G5, M1-6C7 and M3-2A6, which were selected for further analysis. 
         FIG. 14  illustrates the characterization of monoclonal antibody I3.M3-2A6 by the cell-based competitive binding assay. T2 cells (HLA-A2 + , TAP deficient) were stained with cell supernatant from hybridoma I3.M3-2A6 (immunogen=264 tetramers) in the presence of (1) tetramer complex that would compete with specific binding to 264p-HLA-A2; (2) tetramer complex that would not compete with specific binding (eIF4 Gp); or (3) no tetramer, to demonstrate that the antibody specifically recognizes the 264p-HLA-A2 complex on the cell surface. Cell supernatant was pre-absorbed against 20 μg of soluble Her2/neu-peptide-HLA-A2 complexes, diluted 1:200 and added (100 μl) to a tube containing 1 μg of either 264p-HLA-A2 tetramer (competitor) or eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramer (non competitor) for 15 minutes at room temperature. 5×10 5  T2 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μg of 264 peptide for 6 hours at 37° C., washed, resuspended in 100 μl, and added to the preabsorbed/tetramer treated supernatant for 20 minutes at room temperature. After staining, the reaction was washed once with 3-4 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences). 264 peptide-competition resulted in a significant shift of the T2 cell trace (thick line, open trace) to the left (towards the origin) while the eIF4G peptide competition (thin line, open trace) resulted in a much smaller shift away from T2s stained in the absence of tetramer, indicating the presence of a monoclonal antibody with a high degree of specificity for the 264p-HLA-A2 complex. 
         FIG. 15  illustrates a broad outline of the epitope discovery technology described in detail in Hildebrand et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. US 2002/0197672A1, published Dec. 26, 2002, previously incorporated herein by reference). Soluble HLA-secreting transfectants are created in a cancerous or diseased cell line of interest. In a separate experiment, a normal (i.e., noncancerous or non-diseased) cell line also transfected with a construct encoding the soluble HLA is grown and cultured. Soluble HLA molecules are collected from both cell lines, and the peptides are eluted. Mass spectrometric maps are generated comparing cancerous (or diseased) peptides to normal peptides. Differences in the maps are sequenced to identify their precise amino acid sequence, and such sequence is utilized to determine the protein from which the peptide was derived (i.e., its “source protein”). This method was utilized to identify the peptide eIF4G, which has a higher frequency of peptide binding to soluble HLA-A2 in HIV infected cells compared to uninfected cells. This protein is known to be degraded in HIV infected T cells, and elevated levels of the eIF4G peptide presented by HLA-A2 molecules was determined using this technology. 
         FIG. 16  illustrates the stability of the eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramers. Tetramer stability was assessed in mouse serum at 37° C. () and at 4° C. (▴) using the conformational antibodies BB7.2 and W6/32. 25 μg of eIF4G peptide-tetramer complex was added to 5 mL of 100% mouse serum and incubated at 4° C. and 37° C. for 75 hr. At designated times, 50 μL aliquots of sample were removed and stored at −20° C. and remained frozen until completion of the experiment. To determine the integrity of the peptide-HLA tetramer, samples were evaluated using a sandwich ELISA and two antibodies, BB7.2 and W6/32, that bind only conformationally intact peptide-HLA tetramers. An ELISA protocol was developed using 96-well plates (Nunc maxisorb plates) that were coated O/N at 4° C. with 0.5 μg of BB7.2, washed with buffer (PBS/0.05% Tween-20) and then blocked with 200 μl of 5% milk for 1 hr at room temperature. Sample (50 μL) from each time point was added in duplicate wells, incubated for 1 hr at room temperature, washed, and then 50 μL of at 1:1000 dilution of biotin conjugated W6/32 antibody was added to each well and incubated for 1 hr at room temperature. To detect bound antibody the streptavidin-HRP (horseradish peroxidase) conjugate was added to wells at 1:500 dilution, incubated for 15 minutes, washed, and then the assay was developed using ABTS substrate. All sample signals were plotted as % of control. Control tetramer was added to serum, mixed, and immediately removed for assaying by ELISA. The half-life of stability for the eIF4G-peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer at 4° C. was greater than 72 hrs while at 37° C. the half-life was approximately 40 hrs. 
         FIG. 17  illustrates the results from an ELISA of bleeds from 6 individual Balb/c mice immunized with tetramers of eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2. Mouse samples from left to right are I8.M1, I8.M2, I8.M3, I8.M4, I8.M5, I8.M6. P53-264=264p-HLA-A2 monomer (0.5 μg/well), eIF4G=eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 monomer (0.5 μg/well), and Her2/neu=Her2/neu peptide-HLA-A2 monomer (0.5 μg/well). The dilutions of sample bleeds start at 1:200 (blue bar) and titrate down to 1:3600 (light blue bar). Mice (female Balb/c) were immunized 4 times every 2 weeks by subcutaneous injection in the region behind the head or in the side flanks with 100 μl containing 50 μg of eIF4G peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer and 25 μg of QuilA (adjuvant). Bleeds were taken at 3 weeks, 5 weeks and just prior to sacrificing mice.  FIG. 17  shows results from mice sera after 3 immunizations (week 5). Detection of polyclonal antibodies reactive for eIF4G peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer was carried out by ELISA (assay #2 described in  FIG. 5 ). The ELISA results demonstrate that a 264 peptide-HLA-A2 antibody response can be elicited in female Balb/c (I8.M1-M6) mice using the immunization protocol and screening assay of the presently disclosed and claimed invention. 
         FIG. 18  illustrates T2 cell direct binding assay performed according to the method of  FIG. 7 . T2 cells (HLA-A2 + , TAP deficient) were stained with BB7.2 antibody (specific for HLA-A2) to demonstrate that HLA-A2 was present on the surface on these cells. T2 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μg of either 264 or eIF4G peptide for 6 hours at 37° C., washed and stained with 0.5 μg BB7.2 for 20 min. Negative control cells were not pulsed with peptide. After staining, the reaction was washed once with 34 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences). BB7.2 binding was slightly stronger with T2 cells loaded with 264 peptide as indicated by the slightly greater rightward shift with 264 pulsed-T2 cells compared to eIF4G pulsed cells. 
         FIG. 19  illustrates the results of staining of eIF4 Gp-loaded T2 cells with a bleed from an eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 immunized mouse. T2 cells (HLA-A2 + , TAP deficient) were stained with preabsorbed, diluted serum from mouse 18M2 (immunized with eIF4G tetramers) to demonstrate that antibodies exist in the serum which are specific for the eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complex. 5×10 5  T2 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μg of either eIF4G or 264 peptide for 6 hours at 37° C., washed and stained with 100 μl of a 1:200 dilution of preabsorbed sera for 20 min. After staining, the reaction was washed once with 34 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences). eIF4G peptide-pulsed T2 cells (open trace) shifted significantly to the right of the 264 peptide pulsed T2s when stained, indicating the presence of eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 specific antibodies from immunized mice. 
         FIG. 20  illustrates the results of a T2 cell-competitive binding assay, the method of which is outlined in  FIG. 7 . T2 cells (HLA-A2 + , TAP deficient) were stained with pre-absorbed, diluted serum from mouse I8M2 (immunized with eIF4 Gp tetramers) in the presence of (1) monomer complex that would compete with specific binding to eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2; (2) monomer complex that would not compete with specific binding (264p); or (3) no monomer, to demonstrate that the antibody specifically recognizes the eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complex on the cell surface. Cell supernatant was pre-absorbed against 20 μg of soluble Her2/neu-peptide-HLA-A2 complexes, diluted 1:200 and added (100 μl) to tube containing 1 μg of either eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 monomer (competitor) or 264p-HLA-A2 monomer (non competitor) for 15 minutes at room temperature. 5×10 5  T2 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μg of eIF4G peptide for 6 hours at 37° C., washed, resuspended in 100 μl, and added to the preabsorbed/monomer treated supernatant for 20 minutes at room temperature. After staining, the reaction was washed once with 3-4 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences). eIF4G peptide-competition resulted in a significant shift of the T2 cell trace (thick line, open trace) to the left (towards the origin) while the 264 peptide competition (thin line, open trace) resulted in a much smaller shift away from T2s stained in the absence of monomer, indicating the presence of polyclonal antibodies with a high degree of specificity for the eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complex. 
         FIG. 21  illustrates the results of another T2 cell-competitive binding assay similar to the one described in  FIG. 20 , except that the competitor mixed with the mouse bleed prior to reacting with the T2 cells was in the form of a tetramer rather than a monomer. T2 cells (HLA-A2 + , TAP deficient) were stained with pre-absorbed, diluted serum from mouse 18M2 (immunized with eIF4 Gp tetramers) in the presence of (1) tetramer complex that would compete with specific binding to eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2; (2) tetramer complex that would not compete with specific binding (264p); or (3) no tetramer, to demonstrate that the antibody specifically recognizes the eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complex on the cell surface. Cell supernatant was pre-absorbed against 20 μg of soluble Her2/neu-peptide-HLA-A2 complexes, diluted 1:200 and added (100 μl) to tube containing 1 μg of either eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramer (competitor) or 264p-HLA-A2 tetramer (non competitor) for 15 minutes at room temperature. 5×10 5  T2 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μg of eIF4G peptide for 6 hours at 37° C., washed, resuspended in 100 μl, and added to the preabsorbed/tetramer treated supernatant for 20 minutes at room temperature. After staining, the reaction was washed once with 3-4 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences). eIF4G peptide-competition resulted in a significant shift of the T2 cell trace (thick line, open trace) to the left (towards the origin), while the 264 peptide competition (thin line, open trace) resulted in a much smaller shift away from T2s stained in the absence of tetramer, indicating the presence of polyclonal antibodies with a high degree of specificity for the eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complex. 
         FIG. 22  illustrates the binding specificity of mAb 4F7, as determined by ELISA. To assess the binding specificity of 4F7 TCR mimic, a 96-well plate was coated with 0.5 μg of specific monomer (eIF4G-peptide-HLA-A2) and non-specific monomers (264, VLQ and TMT peptide-HLA-A2 monomers). The VLQ and TMT peptides are derived from the human beta-chorionic gonadotropin protein, as described in detail herein after. After blocking wells with 5% milk, 100 ng of 4F7 antibody was added to each well and incubated for 1 hr at room temperature. Plates were washed, probed with 500 ng/well of goat anti-mouse IgG-HRP and developed using ABTS. These results show specific binding of 4F7 to eIF4G peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer coated wells but no binding to wells coated with non-relevant peptide-loaded HLA-A2 complexes. 
         FIG. 23  illustrates 4F7 TCR mimic binding affinity and specificity evaluated by surface plasmon resonance (BIACore). SPR (BIACore) was used to determine the binding affinity constant for 4F7 TCR mimic. Various concentrations of soluble monomer peptide-HLA-A2 (10, 20, 50, and 100 nM) were run over a 4F7 coated chip (4F7 coupled to a biosensor chip via amine chemistry), and then BIACore software was used to best fit the binding curves generated. The affinity constant of 4F7 mAb for its specific ligand was determined at 2×10 −9 M. 
         FIG. 24  illustrates the specific binding of purified 4F7 mAb to eIF4G peptide pulsed cells. T2 cells (HLA-A2 + , TAP deficient) were stained with cell supernatant from hybridoma 4F7 (immunogen=eIF4 Gp tetramers) to demonstrate binding specificity for this monoclonal antibody for the eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complex. 5×10 5  T2 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μg of eIF4G, 264, or TMT peptide for 6 hours at 37° C., washed and stained with 100 μl of 4F7 culture supernatant for 20 min. In addition, cells that were not peptide pulsed were stained in an identical manner with 4F7 to determine the level of background or endogenous eIF4 Gp presented by HLA-A2 on T2 cells. After staining, the reactions were washed once with 34 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. As shown in  FIG. 24-A , samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences). eIF4G peptide-pulsed T2 cells shifted most significantly to the right of the IgG1 isotype stain. Both 264 and TMT peptide pulsed cells overlaid exactly with the 4F7 monoclonal stain of T2 cells that were not peptide pulsed, indicating that 4F7 recognizes a low level of endogenous eIF4G peptide on T2 cells. These data also demonstrate specific binding of the 4F7 monoclonal antibody for eIF4G peptide-pulsed T2 cells. Because peptide pulsed T2 cells showed a greater staining intensity with BB7.2 monoclonal antibody compared to cells that were not pulsed ( FIG. 24-B ), it is concluded that the 4F7 monoclonal antibody does not react non-specifically against HLA-A2. 
         FIG. 25  illustrates that 4F7 TCRm detects endogenous eIF4G (720)  peptide-HLA-A2 complexes on an HLA-A2 positive tumor cell line but not on a normal mammary epithelial cell line. (A) A human mammary epithelial cell line (NHMEC) and (B) a human breast carcinoma cell line (MDA-MB-231) were grown in medium specified by the ATCC and were detached using 1× trypsin/EDTA (0.25% trypsin/2.21 mM EDTA in HBSS without sodium bicarbonate, calcium and magnesium) (Mediatech, Herndon, Va.). Cells were washed and then stained with 5 μg/ml of isotype control mAb or 4F7 TCRm-FITC in PBS/0.5% FBS/2 mM EDTA (staining/wash buffer). FACS analysis was performed on a FACScan (BD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif.). The results from flow cytometric studies are expressed as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in histogram plots. 
         FIG. 26  illustrates that purified 4F7 mAb binds eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complexes on human breast carcinoma cell line MCF-7. MCF-7 cells (HLA-A2 + ) were stained with cell supernatant from hybridoma 4F7 (immunogen=eIF4 Gp tetramers) in the presence of (1) tetramer complex that would compete with specific binding to eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2; (2) tetramer complex that would not compete with specific binding (264p); or (3) no tetramer, to demonstrate that the antibody specifically recognizes the endogenous eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complex on the cell surface. 5×10 5  MCF-7 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μl of 4F7 culture supernatant plus 1 μg of either eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramer (competitor) or 264p-HLA-A2 tetramer (non competitor) or no addition for 15 minutes at room temperature. After staining, the reactions were washed once with 3-4 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of PE-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences). The data shown in  FIG. 26-A  demonstrate 4F7 binding specificity for endogenous peptide eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complexes on MCF-7 tumor cells. In panel B, it is shown that 4F7 and BB7.2 do not bind to HLA-A2 negative BT-20 breast cancer cells, further supporting the claim for 4F7 monoclonal antibody binding specificity for eIF4G peptide presented in the context of HLA-A2. 
         FIG. 27  illustrates staining of MDA-MB-231 cells with 4F7 mAb (50 ng) in the absence or presence of soluble peptide-HLA-A2 monomers including eIF4 Gp (competitor; 25 nM), 264p (non-competitor; 25 nM) or Her2/neu peptide (non-competitor; 25 nM). MDA-MB-231 cells (HLA-A2 + ) were stained with cell supernatant from hybridoma 4F7 (immunogen=eIF4 Gp tetramers) in the presence of (1) monomer complex that would compete with specific binding to eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2; (2) monomer complex that would not compete with specific binding to eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 (264p and Her-2/neu); or (3) no monomer, to demonstrate that the antibody specifically recognizes endogenous eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complex on the cell surface. 5×10 5  MDA-MB-231 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μl of 4F7 culture supernatant plus 25 nM of eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramer (competitor), 264p-HLA-A2 tetramer or Her-2/neu-HLA-A2 (non competitors) or no addition for 15 minutes at room temperature. After staining, the reactions were washed once with 3-4 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of PE-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences).  FIG. 27-A  demonstrates 4F7 binding specificity for endogenous eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complexes on MDA-231 tumor cells. Binding of the 4F7 TCR mimic to MDA-MB-231 cells was significantly reduced (see leftward shift with peak) in the presence of 25 nM of competitor (eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 monomer). In panels B and C, it is shown that 4F7 binding was not blocked when non-relevant (264 and Her-2/neu) peptide-HLA-A2 monomers were used to compete with 4F7 binding to MDA-231 cells. These findings support previous binding specificity data and indicate eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 as a novel tumor antigen. 
         FIG. 28  illustrates endogenous eIF4G peptide presented by HLA-A2 molecules on the surface of HIV-1 infected and non-infected human CD4+ T cells. Mock infected (A-C; upper panels) or HIV-1 infected (D-F and G-1) human CD4+ T cells were stained on day 5 post infection (PI) with IgG 1  (isotype control), 1B8 TCRm (anti-Her2 (369) -HLA-A*0201; specificity and isotype control) or with 4F7 TCRm. HIV-1 exposed CD4+ T cells were gated based on p24 expression and analyzed separately as (D-F) infected-p24 positive (middle panels) or (G-I) non-infected-p24 negative (bottom panels). 
         FIG. 29  illustrates time-dependent expression of eIF4G (720)  peptide-HLA-A2 complexes on HIV-infected cells. Human CD4+ T cells were infected with HIV-1 (strain Ba-L) at an MOI of 1.0 and stained with (A) 4F7 TCRm or (B) isotype control on days 3 thru 9 post-infection. Non-infected cells (p24 negative) are represented by gray bars. HIV-1 infected cells (p24 positive) are represented by black bars. 
         FIG. 30  illustrates HLA-peptide tetramer inhibition of 4F7 staining of HIV-1 infected cells. Human CD4+ T cells were infected with HIV-1 (strain Ba-L) at an MOI of 1.0 and stained with mAb 4F7 TCRm on (A) day 4 PI and (B) day 5 PI in the presence of eIF4G( 720 )-HLA-A*0201-tetramer (competitor), p53( 264 )—HLA-A*0201-tetramer (non-competitor) or VLQ( 44 )-HLA-A*0201 tetramer (non-competitor) or without tetramer addition. Results are from staining p24 positive CD4 +  T cells and are presented as % eIF4G( 720 ) expression. 
         FIG. 31  illustrates the characterization of 1B8 TCRm binding specificity. HLA-A2 tetramer complexes were loaded with 0.1 μg of each of the following peptides: Her2 (369-377; KIFGSLAFL (SEQ ID NO:3)), VLQ (44-52; VLQGVLPAL (SEQ ID NO:5)), eIF4G (720-748; VLMTEDIKL (SEQ ID NO:2)) and TMT (40-48; TMTRVLQGC (SEQ ID NO:4)). Recombinant proteins were detected by staining with 1B8 TCR mAb specific for Her-2 369 -A2 complex (A), 3F9 TCRm mAb specific for TMT 40 -A2 complex (B) and BB7.2 mAb specific for HLA-A2.1 (C) followed by ELISA as described herein. Data are representative of three independent experiments. 
         FIG. 32  illustrates the characterization of 1B8 TCRm binding detection sensitivity. (A) T2 cells (5×10 5 ) were incubated in AIM-V medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.) and loaded with 10 mM Her2 369 , eIF4G 720 , TMT 40  peptide or no peptide. After 4 hr, the cells were washed to remove excess peptide and stained with 0.5 μg/ml of 1B8 TCRm mAb antibody. Bound mAb was detected using the PE-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG heavy chain specific polyclonal Ab. Filled area represents T2 cells stained with IgG 1  isotype control. Data are representative of three independent staining procedures. (B) T2 cells were treated with acid to remove endogenous peptide bound to HLA-A2, pulsed with 20 irrelevant peptides or 20 irrelevant peptides plus the Her2 (369)  peptide and then stained with 1B8 TCRm mAb. T2 cells (5×10 6 /mL) were acid stripped (0.131 M citric acid, 0.067M Na 2 HPO 4 , pH 3.3) for 45 seconds, washed twice with 50 ml of RPMI supplemented with 2 mM Hepes and resuspended at 3.3×10 6 /ml in 30 μg/mL of β2-microglobulin (Fitzgerald Industries, Concord, Mass.) (23, 24). Cells were then incubated for 3.5 hrs in a 20° C. water bath with 2 μM of each peptide, washed, stained with antibodies and evaluated on a BD FACScan. Subsequent analysis was performed using CellQuest software version 3.3 (BD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif.). As a control, T2 cells pulsed with 20 peptides plus p369 peptides were stained with IgG1 isotype-control. (C) HLA-A2 + /Her2 −  normal human mammary epithelial cells were stained with 0.5 μg of IgG 1  isotype control, 1B8 TCRm or BB7.2 mAb. (D) HLA-A2 + /Her2 −  human PBMCs were stained with 0.5 μg of anti-Her2 (TA-1) antibody, 3F9 TCRm, 1B8 TCRm or BB7.2 antibody. (E) T2 cells were incubated with decreasing concentrations (2500-0.08 nM as indicated by the arrows) of p369 peptide and stained with 1B8 TCRm mAb. In all experiments bound antibody was detected using goat anti-mouse PE conjugate. 
         FIG. 33  illustrates that 1B8 detects endogenous Her2/neu peptide-HLA-A2 complexes on HLA-A2 positive tumor cells. All adherent tumor cell lines were grown in medium specified by the ATCC and were detached using 1× trypsin/EDTA (0.25% trypsin/2.21 mM EDTA in HBSS without sodium bicarbonate, calcium and magnesium (Mediatech, Herndon, Va.). Cells were washed and then stained with 5 mg/ml of 1B8 TCRm in PBS/0.5% FBS/2 mM EDTA (staining/wash buffer), and the bound TCRm was detected by subsequent incubation with PE-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG. FACS analysis was performed on a FACScan (BD Biosciences, San Diego, Calif.). The results from flow cytometric studies are expressed either as mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) in histogram plots or as the mean fluorescence intensity ratio (MFIR), the ratio between the MFI of cells stained with the selected mAb and the MFI of cells stained with the isotype-matched mouse Ig. Generation of MFRI values normalizes background staining between the cell lines. (A) Human tumor cell lines were stained with 0.5 μg of isotype control mAb (thin dark gray line), 3F9 TCRm mAb (thick black line) and 1B8 TCRm mAb (thick gray line). (B) Human tumor cells pre-treated with IFN-γ (20 ng/ml) plus TNF-α (3 ng/ml) for 24 hr and then stained with the same three antibodies. Isotype control mAb (thin gray line), 3F9 TCRm mAb (thick black line) and 1B8 TCRm (thick gray line). 
         FIG. 34  illustrates HLA-peptide specific inhibition of human tumor cell staining and CTL killing. (A) MDA-MB-231 cells (5×10 5 ) were incubated for 1 h with 0.5 μg/ml of 1B8 TCRm mAb in the presence of 0.1 or 1.0 μg/ml of Her2/neu peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer, 1.0 μg/ml TMT peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer or no tetramer. After staining, the reactions were washed once and resuspended in 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of PE-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG. Cells were washed as described previously and resuspended in 0.5 ml of wash buffer for characterization on a FACScan. Following incubation, cells were analyzed by flow cytometry as described herein. (B) Confirmation that the CTL line generated in the HLA-A2-Kb transgenic mice was specific for the Her2 (369) -A2 epitope. The CTL line was generated as described by Lustgarten et al (1997). The Her2 369 -specific CTL line was maintained in vitro by weekly restimulation. Briefly, CTLs (1×10 6 ) were restimulated in 2 ml cultures with 0.2×10 6  irradiated Jurkat-A2.1 cells (20,000 rad) that were preincubated with Her-2/neu peptide (15 μM). Irradiated (3000 rad) C57BL/6 spleen cells (5×10 5 ) were added as fillers. Restimulation medium was complete RPMI containing 2% (v/v) supernatant from concanavalin-A stimulated rat spleen cells. T2 cells pulsed with Her2 (369)  peptide or not pulsed were incubated with CTL in a 6 h  51 Cr release assay at an E:T ratio of 10:1. (C) MDA-231 cells were either not treated (white bars) or pre-treated for 24 h with rIFN-γ (20 ng/ml) and TNF-α (3 ng/ml) (black bars). Anti-Her2 (369) -A2 CTL activity was then evaluated in the absence or presence of 0.5 μg of 1B8 TCRm or BB7.2 mAbs in a 6 h  51 Cr release assay at an E:T ratio of 10:1. All CTL assays were done in triplicate from 3 independent experiments. T2 cells pulsed with peptides and tumor cells (MDA-MB-231, Saos-2, MCF-7, SW620 and COLO205) were incubated with 150 μCi of  51 Cr-sodium chromate for 1 hour at 37° C. Cells were washed three times and resuspended in complete RPMI medium. For the cytotoxicity assay,  51 Cr-labeled target cells (10 4 ) were incubated at a 10:1 CTL:target ratio in a final volume of 200 μl in U-bottomed 96-well microtiter plates. Previous studies have shown optimal killing at a 10:1 CTL:tumor cell ratio (Lustgarten et al., 1997). Supernatants were recovered after 4-7 hours of incubation. The percent specific lysis was determined by the formula: percent specific lysis=100×[(experimental release−spontaneous release)/(maximum release−spontaneous release)]. Anti-Her2( 369 )-A2 (1B8) and anti-A2.1 mAb (BB7.2) were added to the assay to determine that the CTL lysis was specific for the Her2/neu/369-peptide-A2.1 complex and A2.1 restricted, respectively. Prior to the addition of the effector cells, tumor cells were incubated in the presence or absence of 0.5 μg/ml of 1B8, BB7.2, or murine IgG 1  and IgG 2 b isotype control antibodies. 
         FIG. 35  illustrates that 1B8 mAb does not bind to soluble Her2/neu peptide. MDA-MB-231 cells (HLA-A2 + ) were stained with cell supernatant from hybridoma 1B8 (immunogen=Her-2/neu tetramers) in the presence or absence of 100 μM of exogenously added Her-2/neu peptide. 5×10 5  MDA-MB-231 cells were incubated in 100 μl of buffer containing 100 μl of 1B8 culture supernatant for 15 minutes at room temperature. After staining the reactions were washed once with 34 ml wash buffer and resuspended in approximately 100 μl of wash buffer containing 0.5 μg of PE-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Caltag, Burlingame, Calif.). Cells were washed as above and resuspended in 0.5 ml wash buffer for analysis. Samples were collected on a FACScan (BD biosciences, San Diego, Calif.) and analyzed using Cell Quest software (version 3.3, BD Biosciences).  FIG. 35  demonstrates that 1B8 TCR mimic has dual specificity and does not bind to Her-2/neu peptide alone. 
         FIG. 36  illustrates the expression of Her2/neu protein in human tumor cell lines. Tumor cell lines were evaluated for the expression of Her2/neu protein by ELISA and flow cytometry. Cellular levels of Her2/neu were determined by preparing tumor cell lysates and quantifying Her2/neu with the c-erbB2/c-neu Rapid Format ELISA (CalBiochem) according to the manufacturer&#39;s instructions. Her2/neu protein was detected in a sandwich ELISA using two mouse monoclonal antibodies. The detector antibody was bound to horseradish peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin and color was developed by incubation with TMT substrate (Pierce). The concentration of Her2/neu in the samples was quantified by generating a standard curve using known concentrations of Her2/neu provided in the kit. (A) Tumor cell lysate was prepared from each line and analyzed for Her2/neu levels (ng/10 6  cells) by ELISA. (B) Surface expression of Her2/neu on tumor cells was determined by staining cells with 0.5 μg of anti-Her2/neu mAb (TA-1) and bound antibody was detected using Goat anti-mouse-PE conjugate. Results are plotted as mean fluorescence intensity ratio (MFIR) with standard deviation from three different experiments. Regression analysis was used to compare the relationship between measuring total Her2/neu antigen in cell lysates with Her2/neu expressed on the cell&#39;s surface. (R 2 =0.82; p&lt;0.05) 
         FIG. 37  illustrates expression of HLA-A*0201 and HLA-Her2 (369)  peptide complexes on human tumor cell lines and CTL lysis of human tumor cell lines. Tumor cell lines were evaluated for the expression of HLA-A2 and Her2 (369) -A2 complex expression. Tumor cells were stained with (A) anti-HLA-A2.1 mAb (BB7.2) and (B) 1B8 TCRm. Results are plotted as mean fluorescence intensity ratio (MFIR) with standard deviation from three different experiments. (C) The specificity of the Her2 (369)-A 2 reactive CTL line was evaluated against human tumor cell lines not treated. CTL cytotoxic activity was evaluated in a 6 h  51 Cr release assay at an E:T ratio of 10:1 as described herein above. Regression analysis was determined from flow cytometric and cytotoxic data for MDA-MB-231, Saos-2, MCF-7, SW620 and Colo205 tumor cell lines. The analyses did not reach significance for peptide-A2 vs. total Her2, tumor lysis vs. total Her2, peptide-A2 vs. HLA-A2, tumor lysis vs. HLA-A2 and peptide-A2 vs. tumor lysis. 
         FIG. 38  illustrates expression of HLA-A*0201 molecules and HLA-Her2 (369) peptide complexes after cytokine treatment of human tumor cell lines. Human tumor cell lines were pre-treated for 24 h with rIFN-γ (20 ng/ml) and TNF-α (3 ng/ml) and stained with (A) anti-A2.1 BB7.2 or (B) 1B8 TCRm mAbs. Results are plotted as mean fluorescence intensity ratio (MFIR) with standard deviation from three different experiments. (C) The specificity of the Her2 (369)-A 2 reactive CTL line was evaluated against human tumor cell lines pre-treated for 24 h with rIFN-γ (20 ng/ml) and TNF-α (3 ng/ml). CTL cytotoxic activity was evaluated in a 6 h  51 Cr release assay at an E:T ratio of 10:1 as described herein above. (D) Data plotted from regression analysis reveals a significant (p≦0.05) relationship between tumor specific lysis and only Her2 (369) -A2 complex level (R 2 =0.75). The analyses did not reach significance for peptide-A2 vs. total Her2, tumor lysis vs. total Her2, peptide-A2 vs. HLA-A2, and tumor lysis vs. HLA-A2. 
         FIG. 39  illustrates the characterization of binding specificity for 3.2G1 TCRm. (A) Supernatant from hybridoma 3.2G1 was used to probe wells coated with HLA-A2 tetramer refolded with the different peptides indicated. Bound antibody was detected with a goat anti-mouse peroxidase conjugate and developed using ABTS. (B) Hybridoma supernatant was used to stain 5×10 5  T2 cells pulsed with the peptides indicated or no peptide. After washing, cells were probed with a goat anti-mouse secondary antibody, washed and analyzed by flow cytometry. (C) T2 cells pulsed with 20 μg/ml of GVL peptide for four hours were stained with serially-diluted 3.2G1 TCRm. The net (pulsed-non-pulsed) mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) was calculated for each antibody concentration and plotted. (D) T2 cells were pulsed with varying levels of GVL peptide and stained with 1 μg/ml 3.2G1 TCRm or BB7.2 mAb followed by a secondary goat anti-mouse antibody. MFI values are shown for the various peptide concentrations. (E) T2 cells were pulsed with 20 μg/ml GVL peptide and then stained with a preincubated mixture of 1 μg/100 μl 3.2G1 TCRm and either GVL tetramer or VLQ tetramer. The tetramer and antibody were preincubated for 40 min before addition to the pulsed cells. Tetramer concentrations (μg/stain) ranged from 1 to 0.01 for GVL and 1 to 0.1 for VLQ. 
         FIG. 40  illustrates CDC of peptide-pulsed T2 cells. T2 cells were pulsed with the various peptide mixes for 4 hours, washed and dispensed into wells in 96 well plates at 3×10 5  cells/well. Antibody and rabbit complement were added and the reactions allowed to proceed for 4 hours, and then cytotoxicity was analyzed using the LDH assay from Promega. (A) T2 cells were pulsed with mixes of GVL:TMT peptide at the concentrations in mg/ml shown in the legend at the top of the figure for 4 hours before incubating with 2.5 μg/ml 3.2G1 TCRm or BB7.2 antibody and rabbit complement. (B) T2 cells were pulsed with varying levels of peptide diluted 1:2 from 50 μg/ml to 0.1 μg/ml before incubating with 10 μg/ml 3.2G1 TCRm or BB7.2 antibody. (C) T2 cells were pulsed with 20 μg/ml peptide before addition of a mix containing varying amounts of antibody and either GVL or VLQ tetramer at a final concentration of 2 μg/ml tetramer. Final antibody concentration was varied from 9 to 0.1 μg/ml and corresponds to color coding shown in the legend for (C). Bars representing standard error are shown for (A), (B) and (C). 
         FIG. 41  illustrates that 3.2G1 detects endogenous GVL-HLA-A2 complexes on human tumor lines. Immunofluorescent staining was carried out using 3.2G1, BB7.2, and isotype control antibodies on four human tumor lines. 3.2G1 detects various levels of GVL/A2 on the cells&#39; surface and does not stain the HLA-A2 negative cell line BT20. 
         FIG. 42  illustrates CDC and ADCC of MDA-MB-231 cells by 3.2G1 TCRm. (A) Complement-dependent cytolysis was carried out using 2×10 5  MDA-MB-231 cells well in a 96 well plate. The final concentration of the antibodies in the wells was varied from 25 to 1 μg/ml and corresponds to color coding shown above the figure. Tetramer concentration in each well was 6 μg/ml. Reactions were incubated for 4 hours and analyzed using the LDH assay. (B) ADCC reactions included 2×10 5  MDA-MB-231 cells/well and IL-2 stimulated human PBMC preparations at an E:T ratio of 30:1 with 10 μg/ml 3.2G1. Lysis was determined using the LDH assay. (C) DCC reactions using IL-2-stimulated human PBMC at an E:T ratio of 20:1 with either 10 μg/ml 3.2G1 (black bars) or 10 μg/ml W6/32 (grey bars). Bars indicate standard error for each reaction. Data from CDC assays are representative of 4 independent experiments. 
         FIG. 43  illustrates that the 3.2G1TCRm prevents tumor growth in athymic nude mice. Female athymic mice were subcutaneously injected between the shoulders with 5×10 6  MDA-MB-231 cells in 0.2 ml containing 1:1 mixture of medium and Matrigel. Mice were given tumor cells and treated i.p. with 100 μg of either murine IgG 2a  isotype control antibody or with GVL/A2 specific 3.2G1 TCRm antibody. After the initial antibody injection, mice received one injection a week (50 μg/injection) for three weeks. Tumor growth was initially seen in mice treated with IgG 2 , control antibody at week 6 and by week 10 the tumor volume had increased &gt;30-fold (⋄). In contrast, no tumor growth was seen in mice treated with the 3.2G1 antibody (▪). Tumors were monitored and final scoring was tabulated at 69 days after implant at which time all tumors were at least 6 mm in diameter and no new tumors had appeared for 21 days. Tumor volumes were calculated by assuming a spherical shape and using the formula, volume=4r 3 /3, where r=½ of the mean tumor diameter measured in two dimensions. Points, median; bars, SEM. Significance P=0.0007, was determined by the Fisher Exact Test. 
         FIG. 44  illustrates that the 3.2G1 TCRm can be used therapeutically to treat athymic nude mice with established tumors. Female athymic mice were subcutaneously injected in the right flank with 1×10 7  MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells containing 1:1 mixture of medium and Matrigel. After 10 days of growth, tumors were measured using calipers with the mean tumor volume (mm 3 ) ranging between 62 and 105 mm 3 . At day 10, mice were injected (100 μg/injection) with either the 3.2G1 TCRm antibody or an IgG 2a  isotype control antibody. Mice then received 3 more injections (50 μg/injection) at weekly intervals. 24 days after initial injection, tumor growth was measured and plotted as tumor volume. Tumor growth in the IgG 2 , isotype control group increased almost three-fold from an initial pre-treatment mean of 105 mm 3  to a mean of 295 mm 3 . In contrast, the 3.2G1 treated group had a mean tumor volume of 62 mm 3  that was reduced to a tumor volume of 8 mm 3  after treatment. Even more impressive was that 3 out of 4 mice in the 3.2G1 treated group had no tumors. Tumor volumes were calculated by assuming a spherical shape and using the formula, volume=4r3/3, where r=1/2 of the mean tumor diameter measured in two dimension. 
         FIG. 45  illustrates the binding specificity of μL3A, as determined by competitive ELISA. Hybridoma cell culture supernatant (50 μL) was incubated in the presence of competitor (TMT peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer) or non-competitor (264 peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer) in wells on a 96-well plate coated previously with 100 ng of TMT peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer. After 1 hr incubation, the plate was washed, probed with goat anti-mouse HRP, developed using ABTS and read on a plate reader. 
         FIG. 46  illustrates flow cytometry analysis of T2 cells pulsed with irrelevant peptide (Her2) or a decreasing amount of relevant peptide (TMT) and stained with μL3A. 
         FIG. 47  illustrates staining of tumor cell line COLO205 (colorectal tumor cell line) with μL3A, demonstrating expression of TMT-A2 complex on the tumor cell surface. 
         FIG. 48  illustrates staining of the tumor cell line MDA-MB-231 with μL3A. A smaller shift is seen in  FIG. 48  when compared to staining of COLO205 cells with μL3A in  FIG. 47 , but this is still a positive signal for TMT peptide expression on the cell surface of the MDA-MB-231 cell line. 
         FIG. 49  illustrates the binding specificity of RL4A-G, as determined by competitive ELISA. The plates were coated with GVL tetramer at a concentration of 100 ng/well (in 50 μL of 1×PBS). The plates coated overnight at 4° C. The plates were blocked for one hour with 5% milk. After washing, 50 μL of sample was added and 300 μg (in 50 μL of 0.5% milk) of the appropriate tetramer (GVL or VLQ) for competition was also added to each well. After letting the plates incubate at RT for two hours, they were washed again and 100 μL of the secondary antibody was added at a 1:4000 dilution. The plates were incubated for one hour at RT, washed, developed with TMB substrate, and finally read on the plate reader.  FIG. 49A  illustrates RL4A-D, whereas  FIG. 49B  illustrates RL4E-G. 
         FIG. 50  illustrates flow cytometric analyses of T2 cells pulsed with relevant (GVL) or irrelevant (Her2) peptides, or unpulsed T2 cells, and stained with RL4A ( FIG. 50A ), RL4B ( FIG. 50B ), RL4C ( FIG. 50C ), RL4D ( FIG. 50D ), RL4E ( FIG. 50E ), RL4F ( FIG. 50F ), and RL4G ( FIG. 50G ), and an isotype control. 
         FIG. 51  illustrates staining of the tumor cell line MDA-468 (breast cancer) with RL4B. 
         FIG. 52  illustrates staining of the tumor cell line MDA-231 (breast cancer) with RL4B. 
         FIG. 53  illustrates staining of the tumor cell line MCF-7 (breast cancer) with RL4D. 
         FIG. 54  illustrates staining of the tumor cell line MDA-231 (breast cancer) with RL4D. 
         FIG. 55  illustrates the binding specificity of RL5A-C, as determined by competitive ELISA. 
         FIG. 55A : Competition ELISA data for RL5A-B, screened against irrelevant (GVL) and antigen (VLQ) peptide. The plate was coated with VLQ tetramer at a concentration of 100 ng/well (in 50 μL of 1×PBS). The plate coated overnight at 4° C. The plate was blocked for one hour with 5% milk. After washing, 50 μL of sample was added and 300 μg (in 50 μL of 0.5% milk) of the appropriate tetramer (VLQ or GVL) for competition was also added to each well. After letting the plate incubate at RT for two hours, it was washed again and 100 μL of the secondary antibody was added at a 1:4000 dilution. The plate was incubated for one hour, washed, developed with ABTS substrate, and finally read on the plate reader.  FIG. 55B : Sandwich ELISA data for RL5C and two non-specific mAb&#39;s (IV1-1.5H7 and IV1-1.6A6), screened against irrelevant (eIF4G, TMT and GVL) and antigen (VLQ) peptides. The plate was coated with appropriate tetramer (eIF4G, TMT, GVL or VLQ) at a concentration of 100 ng/well (in 50 μL of 1×PBS). The plate was coated overnight at 4° C. The plate was blocked for one hour with 5% milk. After washing, 50 μL of sample was added to each well. After letting the plate incubate at RT for two hours, it was washed again and 100 μL of the secondary antibody was added at a 1:4000 dilution. The plate was incubated for one hour, washed, developed with ABTS substrate, and finally read on the plate reader. 
         FIG. 56  illustrates flow cytometric analyses of T2 cells peptide pulsed with relevant (VLQ) or irrelevant (TMT) peptides, or unpulsed T2 cells, and stained with RL5A ( FIG. 56A ), RL5B ( FIG. 56B ), and RL5C ( FIG. 56C ) and an isotype control. 
         FIG. 57  illustrates the binding specificity of RL6A-E, as determined by sandwich ELISA (no competition). The plates were coated with appropriate tetramer (relevant—YLL, or irrelevant—GVL) at a concentration of 100 ng/well (in 50 μl of 1×PBS). The plates were coated overnight at 4° C. The plates were blocked for one hour with 5% milk. After washing, 50 μl of sample was added to each well. After letting the plates incubate at room temperature for two hours, they were washed again, and 100 μl of secondary antibody was added at a 1:4000 dilution. The plates were incubated for one hour, washed and developed with ABTS substrate, followed by reading on the plate reader. 
         FIG. 58  illustrates flow cytometric analyses of T2 cells pulsed with relevant (YLL) or irrelevant (TMT) peptides, or unpulsed T2 cells, stained with RL6A ( FIG. 58A ), RL6B ( FIG. 58B ), RL6C ( FIG. 58C ), RL6D ( FIG. 58D ), and RL6E ( FIG. 58E ) and an isotype control. 
         FIG. 59  illustrates staining of tumor cell line SKOV3.A2 (ovarian cancer cell line) with RL6A ( FIG. 59A ), RL6B ( FIG. 59B ), RL6C ( FIG. 59C ), RL6D ( FIG. 59D ), and RL6E ( FIG. 59E ). 
         FIG. 60  illustrates the binding specificity of RL7A, RL7C and RL7D, as determined by sandwich ELISA (no competition). The plates were coated with appropriate tetramer (relevant—TLA, or irrelevant—KLM) at a concentration of 100 ng/well (in 50 μl of 1×PBS). The plates were coated overnight at 4° C. The plates were blocked for one hour with 5% milk. After washing, 50 μl of sample was added to each well. After letting the plates incubate at room temperature for two hours, they were washed again, and 100 μl of secondary antibody was added at a 1:4000 dilution. The plates were incubated for one hour, washed and developed with ABTS substrate, followed by reading on the plate reader. 
         FIG. 61  illustrates flow cytometric analyses of T2 cells pulsed with relevant (TLA) or irrelevant (KLM) peptides, or unpulsed T2 cells, stained with RL7A ( FIG. 61A ), RL7C ( FIG. 61B ) and RL7D ( FIG. 61C ) and an isotype control. 
         FIG. 62  illustrates the binding specificity of RL8, as determined by sandwich ELISA (no competition). The plates were coated with appropriate tetramer (relevant—YLEV, or irrelevant—KLM) at a concentration of 100 ng/well (in 50 μl of 1×PBS). The plates were coated overnight at 4° C. The plates were blocked for one hour with 5% milk. After washing, 50 μl of sample was added to each well. After letting the plates incubate at room temperature for two hours, they were washed again, and 100 μl of secondary antibody was added at a 1:4000 dilution. The plates were incubated for one hour, washed and developed with ABTS substrate, followed by reading on the plate reader. 
         FIG. 63  illustrates flow cytometric analysis of T2 cells peptide pulsed with relevant (YLEV) or irrelevant (KLM) peptides, or unpulsed T2 cells, stained with RL8A and an isotype control. 
         FIG. 64  illustrates the binding specificity of RL9A-E, as determined by sandwich ELISA (no competition). The plates were coated with appropriate tetramer (relevant—SLLV, or irrelevant—eIF4G or GIL) at a concentration of 100 ng/well (in 50 μl of 1×PBS). The plates were coated overnight at 4° C. The plates were blocked for one hour with 5% milk. After washing, 50 μl of sample was added to each well. After letting the plates incubate at room temperature for two hours, they were washed again, and 100 μl of secondary antibody was added at a 1:4000 dilution. The plates were incubated for one hour, washed and developed with ABTS substrate, followed by reading on the plate reader. 
         FIG. 65  illustrates flow cytometric analyses of T2 cells peptide pulsed with relevant (SLLV) or irrelevant (ILA, TLA, YLEV, YLL) peptides, or unpulsed T2 cells, stained with RL9A ( FIG. 65A ), RL9B ( FIG. 65B ), RL9C ( FIG. 65C ), RL9D ( FIG. 65D ), RL9D ( FIG. 65D ), RL9E ( FIG. 65E ), RL9F ( FIG. 65F ) and RL9G ( FIG. 65G ) and an isotype control. 
         FIG. 66  illustrates staining of tumor cell line ST486 (Burkitt&#39;s Lymphoma) with RL9A. 
         FIG. 67  illustrates staining of tumor cell line U266 (multiple myeloma) with RL9A. 
         FIG. 68  illustrates the binding specificity of RL10A, as determined by sandwich ELISA (no competition). The plates were coated with appropriate tetramer (relevant—ILA, or irrelevant—VLQV) at a concentration of 100 ng/well (in 50 μl of 1×PBS). The plates were coated overnight at 4° C. The plates were blocked for one hour with 5% milk. After washing, 50 μl of sample was added to each well. After letting the plates incubate at room temperature for two hours, they were washed again, and 100 μl of secondary antibody was added at a 1:4000 dilution. The plates were incubated for one hour, washed and developed with ABTS substrate, followed by reading on the plate reader. 
         FIG. 69  illustrates flow cytometric analysis of T2 cells peptide pulsed with relevant (ILA) or irrelevant (SLLV, TLA, YLEV, YLL) peptides, or unpulsed T2 cells, stained with RL10A and an isotype control. 
         FIG. 70  illustrates staining of tumor cell line MDA-MB-231 (breast cancer) with RL10A. 
         FIG. 71  illustrates the binding specificity of RL11A, as determined by sandwich ELISA (no competition). The plates were coated with appropriate tetramer (relevant—GPR (B7A1), or irrelevant—RPY (B7B2)) at a concentration of 100 ng/well (in 50 μl of 1×PBS). The plates were coated overnight at 4° C. The plates were blocked for one hour with 5% milk. After washing, 50 μl of sample was added to each well. After letting the plates incubate at room temperature for two hours, they were washed again, and 100 μl of secondary antibody was added at a 1:4000 dilution. The plates were incubated for one hour, washed and developed with ABTS substrate, followed by reading on the plate reader. 
         FIG. 72  illustrates flow cytometric analysis of T2 cells peptide pulsed with relevant (GPR) or irrelevant (RPY, TPQ) peptides, or unpulsed T2 cells, stained with RL11A and an isotype control. 
         FIG. 73  illustrates the binding specificity of RL12A-D, as determined by sandwich ELISA (no competition). The plates were coated with appropriate tetramer (relevant—EVD, or irrelevant—EAD) at a concentration of 100 ng/well (in 50 μl of 1×PBS). The plates were coated overnight at 4° C. The plates were blocked for one hour with 5% milk. After washing, 50 μl of sample was added to each well. After letting the plates incubate at room temperature for two hours, they were washed again, and 100 μl of secondary antibody was added at a 1:4000 dilution. The plates were incubated for one hour, washed and developed with ABTS substrate, followed by reading on the plate reader. 
         FIG. 74  illustrates a protocol for the generation of peptide-MHC Class I specific TCR mimics of the present invention. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     Before explaining at least one embodiment of the invention in detail by way of exemplary drawings, experimentation, results, and laboratory procedures, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings, experimentation and/or results. The invention is capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. As such, the language used herein is intended to be given the broadest possible scope and meaning; and the embodiments are meant to be exemplary—not exhaustive. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. 
     Unless otherwise defined herein, scientific and technical terms used in connection with the present invention shall have the meanings that are commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. Further, unless otherwise required by context, singular terms shall include pluralities and plural terms shall include the singular. Generally, nomenclatures utilized in connection with, and techniques of, cell and tissue culture, molecular biology, and protein and oligo- or polynucleotide chemistry and hybridization described herein are those well known and commonly used in the art. Standard techniques are used for recombinant DNA, oligonucleotide synthesis, and tissue culture and transformation (e.g., electroporation, lipofection). Enzymatic reactions and purification techniques are performed according to manufacturer&#39;s specifications or as commonly accomplished in the art or as described herein. The foregoing techniques and procedures are generally performed according to conventional methods well known in the art and as described in various general and more specific references that are cited and discussed throughout the present specification. See e.g., Sambrook et al. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual (2 nd  ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y. (1989) and Coligan et al. Current Protocols in Immunology (Current Protocols, Wiley Interscience (1994)), which are incorporated herein by reference. The nomenclatures utilized in connection with, and the laboratory procedures and techniques of, analytical chemistry, synthetic organic chemistry, and medicinal and pharmaceutical chemistry described herein are those well known and commonly used in the art. Standard techniques are used for chemical syntheses, chemical analyses, pharmaceutical preparation, formulation, and delivery, and treatment of patients. 
     As utilized in accordance with the present disclosure, the following terms, unless otherwise indicated, shall be understood to have the following meanings: 
     The terms “isolated polynucleotide” and “isolated nucleic acid segment” as used herein shall mean a polynucleotide of genomic, cDNA, or synthetic origin or some combination thereof, which by virtue of its origin the “isolated polynucleotide” or “isolated nucleic acid segment” (1) is not associated with all or a portion of a polynucleotide in which the “isolated polynucleotide” or “isolated nucleic acid segment” is found in nature, (2) is operably linked to a polynucleotide which it is not linked to in nature, or (3) does not occur in nature as part of a larger sequence. 
     The term “isolated protein” referred to herein means a protein of cDNA, recombinant RNA, or synthetic origin or some combination thereof, which by virtue of its origin, or source of derivation, the “isolated protein” (1) is not associated with proteins found in nature, (2) is free of other proteins from the same source, e.g., free of murine proteins, (3) is expressed by a cell from a different species, or, (4) does not occur in nature. 
     The term “polypeptide” as used herein is a generic term to refer to native protein, fragments, or analogs of a polypeptide sequence. Hence, native protein, fragments, and analogs are species of the polypeptide genus. 
     The term “naturally-occurring” as used herein as applied to an object refers to the fact that an object can be found in nature. For example, a polypeptide or polynucleotide sequence that is present in an organism (including viruses) that can be isolated from a source in nature and which has not been intentionally modified by man in the laboratory or otherwise is naturally-occurring. 
     The term “operably linked” as used herein refers to positions of components so described are in a relationship permitting them to function in their intended manner. A control sequence “operably linked” to a coding sequence is ligated in such a way that expression of the coding sequence is achieved under conditions compatible with the control sequences. 
     The term “control sequence” as used herein refers to polynucleotide sequences which are necessary to effect the expression and processing of coding sequences to which they are ligated. The nature of such control sequences differs depending upon the host organism; in prokaryotes, such control sequences generally include promoter, ribosomal binding site, and transcription termination sequence; in eukaryotes, generally, such control sequences include promoters and transcription termination sequence. The term “control sequences” is intended to include, at a minimum, all components whose presence is essential for expression and processing, and can also include additional components whose presence is advantageous, for example, leader sequences and fusion partner sequences. 
     The term “polynucleotide” as referred to herein means a polymeric form of nucleotides of at least 10 bases in length, either ribonucleotides or deoxynucleotides or a modified form of either type of nucleotide. The term includes single and double stranded forms of DNA. 
     The term “oligonucleotide” referred to herein includes naturally occurring, and modified nucleotides linked together by naturally occurring, and non-naturally occurring oligonucleotide linkages. Oligonucleotides are a polynucleotide subset generally comprising a length of 200 bases or fewer. In one embodiment, oligonucleotides are 10 to 60 bases in length, such as but not limited to, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, or 20 to 40 bases in length. Oligonucleotides are usually single stranded, e.g., for probes; although oligonucleotides may be double stranded, e.g., for use in the construction of a gene mutant. Oligonucleotides of the invention can be either sense or antisense oligonucleotides. 
     The term “naturally occurring nucleotides” referred to herein includes deoxyribonucleotides and ribonucleotides. The term “modified nucleotides” referred to herein includes nucleotides with modified or substituted sugar groups and the like. The term “oligonucleotide linkages” referred to herein includes oligonucleotides linkages such as phosphorothioate, phosphorodithioate, phosphoroselenoate, phosphorodiselenoate, phosphoroanilothioate, phoshoraniladate, phosphoroamidate, and the like. See e.g., LaPlanche et al. Nucl. Acids Res. 14:9081 (1986); Stec et al. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 106:6077 (1984); Stein et al. Nucl. Acids Res. 16:3209 (1988); Zon et al. Anti-Cancer Drug Design 6:539 (1991); Zon et al. Oligonucleotides and Analogues: A Practical Approach, pp. 87-108 (F. Eckstein, Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford England (1991)); Stec et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,151,510; Uhlmann and Peyman Chemical Reviews 90:543 (1990), the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference. An oligonucleotide can include a label for detection, if desired. 
     The term “selectively hybridize” referred to herein means to detectably and specifically bind. Polynucleotides, oligonucleotides and fragments thereof in accordance with the invention selectively hybridize to nucleic acid strands under hybridization and wash conditions that minimize appreciable amounts of detectable binding to nonspecific nucleic acids. High stringency conditions can be used to achieve selective hybridization conditions as known in the art and discussed herein. Generally, the nucleic acid sequence homology between the polynucleotides, oligonucleotides, and fragments of the invention and a nucleic acid sequence of interest will be at least 80%, and more typically with increasing homologies of at least 85%, 90%, 95%, 99%, and 100%. Two amino acid sequences are homologous if there is a partial or complete identity between their sequences. For example, 85% homology means that 85% of the amino acids are identical when the two sequences are aligned for maximum matching. Gaps (in either of the two sequences being matched) are allowed in maximizing matching; gap lengths of 5 or less are preferred with 2 or less being more preferred. Alternatively and preferably, two protein sequences (or polypeptide sequences derived from them of at least 30 amino acids in length) are homologous, as this term is used herein, if they have an alignment score of at more than 5 (in standard deviation units) using the program ALIGN with the mutation data matrix and a gap penalty of 6 or greater. See Dayhoff, M. O., in Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, pp. 101-110 (Volume 5, National Biomedical Research Foundation (1972)) and Supplement 2 to this volume, pp. 1-10. The two sequences or parts thereof are more preferably homologous if their amino acids are greater than or equal to 50% identical when optimally aligned using the ALIGN program. The term “corresponds to” is used herein to mean that a polynucleotide sequence is homologous (i.e., is identical, not strictly evolutionarily related) to all or a portion of a reference polynucleotide sequence, or that a polypeptide sequence is identical to a reference polypeptide sequence. In contradistinction, the term “complementary to” is used herein to mean that the complementary sequence is homologous to all or a portion of a reference polynucleotide sequence. For illustration, the nucleotide sequence “TATAC” corresponds to a reference sequence “TATAC” and is complementary to a reference sequence “GTATA”. 
     The following terms are used to describe the sequence relationships between two or more polynucleotide or amino acid sequences: “reference sequence”, “comparison window”, “sequence identity”, “percentage of sequence identity”, and “substantial identity”. A “reference sequence” is a defined sequence used as a basis for a sequence comparison; a reference sequence may be a subset of a larger sequence, for example, as a segment of a full-length cDNA or gene sequence given in a sequence listing or may comprise a complete cDNA or gene sequence. Generally, a reference sequence is at least 18 nucleotides or 6 amino acids in length, frequently at least 24 nucleotides or 8 amino acids in length, and often at least 48 nucleotides or 16 amino acids in length. Since two polynucleotides or amino acid sequences may each (1) comprise a sequence (i.e., a portion of the complete polynucleotide or amino acid sequence) that is similar between the two molecules, and (2) may further comprise a sequence that is divergent between the two polynucleotides or amino acid sequences, sequence comparisons between two (or more) molecules are typically performed by comparing sequences of the two molecules over a “comparison window” to identify and compare local regions of sequence similarity. A “comparison window”, as used herein, refers to a conceptual segment of at least 18 contiguous nucleotide positions or 6 amino acids wherein a polynucleotide sequence or amino acid sequence may be compared to a reference sequence of at least 18 contiguous nucleotides or 6 amino acid sequences and wherein the portion of the polynucleotide sequence in the comparison window may comprise additions, deletions, substitutions, and the like (i.e., gaps) of 20 percent or less as compared to the reference sequence (which does not comprise additions or deletions) for optimal alignment of the two sequences. Optimal alignment of sequences for aligning a comparison window may be conducted by the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman Adv. Appl. Math. 2:482 (1981), by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch J. Mol. Biol. 48:443 (1970), by the search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.) 85:2444 (1988), by computerized implementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT, FASTA, and TFASTA in the Wisconsin Genetics Software Package Release 7.0, (Genetics Computer Group, 575 Science Dr., Madison, Wis.), Geneworks, or MacVector software packages), or by inspection, and the best alignment (i.e., resulting in the highest percentage of homology over the comparison window) generated by the various methods is selected. 
     The term “sequence identity” means that two polynucleotide or amino acid sequences are identical (i.e., on a nucleotide-by-nucleotide or residue-by-residue basis) over the comparison window. The term “percentage of sequence identity” is calculated by comparing two optimally aligned sequences over the window of comparison, determining the number of positions at which the identical nucleic acid base (e.g., A, T, C, G, U, or I) or residue occurs in both sequences to yield the number of matched positions, dividing the number of matched positions by the total number of positions in the comparison window (i.e., the window size), and multiplying the result by 100 to yield the percentage of sequence identity. The terms “substantial identity” as used herein denotes a characteristic of a polynucleotide or amino acid sequence, wherein the polynucleotide or amino acid comprises a sequence that has at least 85 percent sequence identity, such as at least 90 to 95 percent sequence identity, or at least 99 percent sequence identity as compared to a reference sequence over a comparison window of at least 18 nucleotide (6 amino acid) positions, frequently over a window of at least 24-48 nucleotide (8-16 amino acid) positions, wherein the percentage of sequence identity is calculated by comparing the reference sequence to the sequence which may include deletions or additions which total 20 percent or less of the reference sequence over the comparison window. The reference sequence may be a subset of a larger sequence. 
     As used herein, the twenty conventional amino acids and their abbreviations follow conventional usage. See Immunology—A Synthesis (2 nd  Edition, E. S. Golub and D. R. Gren, Eds., Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Mass. (1991)), which is incorporated herein by reference. Stereoisomers (e.g., D-amino acids) of the twenty conventional amino acids, unnatural amino acids such as α-,α-disubstituted amino acids, N-alkyl amino acids, lactic acid, and other unconventional amino acids may also be suitable components for polypeptides of the present invention. Examples of unconventional amino acids include: 4-hydroxyproline, γ-carboxyglutamate, ε-N,N,N-trimethyllysine, ε-N-acetyllysine, O-phosphoserine, N-acetylserine, N-formylmethionine, 3-methylhistidine, 5-hydroxylysine, σ-N-methylarginine, and other similar amino acids and imino acids (e.g., 4-hydroxyproline). In the polypeptide notation used herein, the lefthand direction is the amino terminal direction and the righthand direction is the carboxy-terminal direction, in accordance with standard usage and convention. 
     Similarly, unless specified otherwise, the lefthand end of single-stranded polynucleotide sequences is the 5′ end; the lefthand direction of double-stranded polynucleotide sequences is referred to as the 5′ direction. The direction of 5′ to 3′ addition of nascent RNA transcripts is referred to as the transcription direction; sequence regions on the DNA strand having the same sequence as the RNA and which are 5′ to the 5′ end of the RNA transcript are referred to as “upstream sequences”; sequence regions on the DNA strand having the same sequence as the RNA and which are 3′ to the 3′ end of the RNA transcript are referred to as “downstream sequences”. 
     As applied to polypeptides, the term “substantial identity” means that two peptide sequences, when optimally aligned, such as by the programs GAP or BESTFIT using default gap weights, share at least 80 percent sequence identity, such as at least 90 percent sequence identity, or at least 95 percent sequence identity, or at least 99 percent sequence identity. Preferably, residue positions which are not identical differ by conservative amino acid substitutions. Conservative amino acid substitutions refer to the interchangeability of residues having similar side chains. For example, a group of amino acids having aliphatic side chains is glycine, alanine, valine, leucine, and isoleucine; a group of amino acids having aliphatic-hydroxyl side chains is serine and threonine; a group of amino acids having amide-containing side chains is asparagine and glutamine; a group of amino acids having aromatic side chains is phenylalanine, tyrosine, and tryptophan; a group of amino acids having basic side chains is lysine, arginine, and histidine; and a group of amino acids having sulfur-containing side chains is cysteine and methionine. Preferred conservative amino acids substitution groups are: valine-leucine-isoleucine, phenylalanine-tyrosine, lysine-arginine, alanine-valine, glutamic-aspartic, and asparagine-glutamine. 
     As discussed herein, minor variations in the amino acid sequences of antibodies or immunoglobulin molecules are contemplated as being encompassed by the present invention, providing that the variations in the amino acid sequence maintain at least 75%, such as at least 80%, 90%, 95%, and 99%. In particular, conservative amino acid replacements are contemplated. Conservative replacements are those that take place within a family of amino acids that are related in their side chains. Genetically encoded amino acids are generally divided into families: (1) acidic=aspartate, glutamate; (2) basic=lysine, arginine, histidine; (3) nonpolar=alanine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, proline, phenylalanine, methionine, tryptophan; and (4) uncharged polar=glycine, asparagine, glutamine, cysteine, serine, threonine, tyrosine. More preferred families are: serine and threonine are aliphatic-hydroxy family; asparagine and glutamine are an amide-containing family; alanine, valine, leucine and isoleucine are an aliphatic family; and phenylalanine, tryptophan, and tyrosine are an aromatic family. For example, it is reasonable to expect that an isolated replacement of a leucine with an isoleucine or valine, an aspartate with a glutamate, a threonine with a serine, or a similar replacement of an amino acid with a structurally related amino acid will not have a major effect on the binding or properties of the resulting molecule, especially if the replacement does not involve an amino acid within a framework site. Whether an amino acid change results in a functional peptide can readily be determined by assaying the specific activity of the polypeptide derivative. Fragments or analogs of antibodies or immunoglobulin molecules can be readily prepared by those of ordinary skill in the art. Preferred amino- and carboxy-termini of fragments or analogs occur near boundaries of functional domains. Structural and functional domains can be identified by comparison of the nucleotide and/or amino acid sequence data to public or proprietary sequence databases. Preferably, computerized comparison methods are used to identify sequence motifs or predicted protein conformation domains that occur in other proteins of known structure and/or function. Methods to identify protein sequences that fold into a known three-dimensional structure are known. Bowie et al. Science 253:164 (1991). Thus, the foregoing examples demonstrate that those of skill in the art can recognize sequence motifs and structural conformations that may be used to define structural and functional domains in accordance with the invention. 
     Preferred amino acid substitutions are those which: (1) reduce susceptibility to proteolysis, (2) reduce susceptibility to oxidation, (3) alter binding affinity for forming protein complexes, (4) alter binding affinities, and (5) confer or modify other physicochemical or functional properties of such analogs. Analogs can include various mutations of a sequence other than the naturally-occurring peptide sequence. For example, single or multiple amino acid substitutions (preferably conservative amino acid substitutions) may be made in the naturally-occurring sequence (preferably in the portion of the polypeptide outside the domain(s) forming intermolecular contacts. A conservative amino acid substitution should not substantially change the structural characteristics of the parent sequence (e.g., a replacement amino acid should not tend to break a helix that occurs in the parent sequence, or disrupt other types of secondary structure that characterizes the parent sequence). Examples of art-recognized polypeptide secondary and tertiary structures are described in Proteins, Structures and Molecular Principles (Creighton, Ed., W. H. Freeman and Company, New York (1984)); Introduction to Protein Structure ©. Branden and J. Tooze, eds., Garland Publishing, New York, N.Y. (1991)); and Thornton et al. Nature 354:105 (1991), which are each incorporated herein by reference. 
     The term “polypeptide fragment” as used herein refers to a polypeptide that has an amino-terminal and/or carboxy-terminal deletion, but where the remaining amino acid sequence is identical to the corresponding positions in the naturally-occurring sequence deduced, for example, from a full-length cDNA sequence. Fragments typically are at least 5, 6, 8 or 10 amino acids long, such as at least 14 amino acids long or at least 20 amino acids long, usually at least 50 amino acids long or at least 70 amino acids long. 
     “Antibody” or “antibody peptide(s)” refer to an intact antibody, or a binding fragment thereof that competes with the intact antibody for specific binding. Binding fragments are produced by recombinant DNA techniques, or by enzymatic or chemical cleavage of intact antibodies. Binding fragments include Fab, Fab′, F(ab′) 2 , Fv, and single-chain antibodies. An antibody other than a “bispecific” or “bifunctional” antibody is understood to have each of its binding sites identical. An antibody substantially inhibits adhesion of a receptor to a counterreceptor when an excess of antibody reduces the quantity of receptor bound to counterreceptor by at least about 20%, 40%, 60% or 80%, and more usually greater than about 85% (as measured in an in vitro competitive binding assay). 
     The term “MHC” as used herein will be understood to refer to the Major Histocompability Complex, which is defined as a set of gene loci specifying major histocompatibility antigens. The term “HLA” as used herein will be understood to refer to Human Leukocyte Antigens, which is defined as the histocompatibility antigens found in humans. As used herein, “HLA” is the human form of “MHC”. 
     The terms “MHC light chain” and “MHC heavy chain” as used herein will be understood to refer to portions of the MHC molecule. Structurally, class I molecules are heterodimers comprised of two noncovalently bound polypeptide chains, a larger “heavy” chain (α) and a smaller “light” chain (β-2-microglobulin or β2m). The polymorphic, polygenic heavy chain (45 kDa), encoded within the MHC on chromosome six, is subdivided into three extracellular domains (designated 1, 2, and 3), one intracellular domain, and one transmembrane domain. The two outermost extracellular domains, 1 and 2, together form the groove that binds antigenic peptide. Thus, interaction with the TCR occurs at this region of the protein. The 3 domain of the molecule contains the recognition site for the CD8 protein on the CTL; this interaction serves to stabilize the contact between the T cell and the APC. The invariant light chain (12 kDa), encoded outside the MHC on chromosome 15, consists of a single, extracellular polypeptide. The terms “MHC light chain”, “β-2-microglobulin”, and “β2m” may be used interchangeably herein. 
     The term “epitope” includes any protein determinant capable of specific binding to an immunoglobulin or T-cell receptor. Epitopic determinants usually consist of chemically active surface groupings of molecules such as amino acids or sugar side chains and usually have specific three dimensional structural characteristics, as well as specific charge characteristics. An antibody is said to specifically bind an antigen when the dissociation constant is &lt;1 μM, or &lt;100 nM, or &lt;10 nM. 
     The term “antibody” is used in the broadest sense, and specifically covers monoclonal antibodies (including full length monoclonal antibodies), polyclonal antibodies, multispecific antibodies (e.g., bispecific antibodies), and antibody fragments (e.g., Fab, F(ab′) 2  and Fv) so long as they exhibit the desired biological activity. Antibodies (Abs) and immunoglobulins (Igs) are glycoproteins having the same structural characteristics. While antibodies exhibit binding specificity to a specific antigen, immunoglobulins include both antibodies and other antibody-like molecules which lack antigen specificity. Polypeptides of the latter kind are, for example, produced at low levels by the lymph system and at increased levels by myelomas. 
     Native antibodies and immunoglobulins are usually heterotetrameric glycoproteins of about 150,000 daltons, composed of two identical light (L) chains and two identical heavy (H) chains. Each light chain is linked to a heavy chain by one covalent disulfide bond. While the number of disulfide linkages varies between the heavy chains of different immunoglobulin isotypes. Each heavy and light chain also has regularly spaced intrachain disulfide bridges. Each heavy chain has at one end a variable domain (VH) followed by a number of constant domains. Each light chain has a variable domain at one end (VL) and a constant domain at its other end. The constant domain of the light chain is aligned with the first constant domain of the heavy chain, and the light chain variable domain is aligned with the variable domain of the heavy chain. Particular amino acid residues are believed to form an interface between the light and heavy chain variable domains (Clothia et al., J. Mol. Biol. 186, 651-66, 1985); Novotny and Haber, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82 4592-4596 (1985). 
     An “isolated” antibody is one which has been identified and separated and/or recovered from a component of the environment in which is was produced. Contaminant components of its production environment are materials which would interfere with diagnostic or therapeutic uses for the antibody, and may include enzymes, hormones, and other proteinaceous or nonproteinaceous solutes. In certain embodiments, the antibody will be purified as measurable by at least three different methods: 1) to greater than 50% by weight of antibody as determined by the Lowry method, such as more than 75% by weight, or more than 85% by weight, or more than 95% by weight, or more than 99% by weight; 2) to a degree sufficient to obtain at least 10 residues of N-terminal or internal amino acid sequence by use of a spinning cup sequentator, such as at least 15 residues of sequence; or 3) to homogeneity by SDS-PAGE under reducing or non-reducing conditions using Coomasie blue or, preferably, silver stain. Isolated antibody includes the antibody in situ within recombinant cells since at least one component of the antibody&#39;s natural environment will not be present. Ordinarily, however, isolated antibody will be prepared by at least one purification step. 
     The term “antibody mutant” refers to an amino acid sequence variant of an antibody wherein one or more of the amino acid residues have been modified. Such mutants necessarily have less than 100% sequence identity or similarity with the amino acid sequence having at least 75% amino acid sequence identity or similarity with the amino acid sequence of either the heavy or light chain variable domain of the antibody, such as at least 80%, or at least 85%, or at least 90%, or at least 95%. 
     The term “variable” in the context of variable domain of antibodies, refers to the fact that certain portions of the variable domains differ extensively in sequence among antibodies and are used in the binding and specificity of each particular antibody for its particular antigen. However, the variability is not evenly distributed through the variable domains of antibodies. It is concentrated in three segments called complementarity determining regions (CDRs) also known as hypervariable regions both in the light chain and the heavy chain variable domains. There are at least two techniques for determining CDRs: (1) an approach based on cross-species sequence variability (i.e., Kabat et al., Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Md. 1987); and (2) an approach based on crystallographic studies of antigen-antibody complexes (Chothia, C. et al. (1989), Nature 342: 877). The more highly conserved portions of variable domains are called the framework (FR). The variable domains of native heavy and light chains each comprise four FR regions, largely adopting a β-sheet configuration, connected by three CDRs, which form loops connecting, and in some cases forming part of, the β-sheet structure. The CDRs in each chain are held together in close proximity by the FR regions and, with the CDRs from the other chain, contribute to the formation of the antigen binding site of antibodies (see Kabat et al.) The constant domains are not involved directly in binding an antibody to an antigen, but exhibit various effector function, such as participation of the antibody in antibody-dependent cellular toxicity. 
     The term “antibody fragment” refers to a portion of a full-length antibody, generally the antigen binding or variable region. Examples of antibody fragments include Fab, Fab′, F(ab′) 2  and Fv fragments. Papain digestion of antibodies produces two identical antigen binding fragments, called the Fab fragment, each with a single antigen binding site, and a residual “Fc” fragment, so-called for its ability to crystallize readily. Pepsin treatment yields an F(ab′) 2  fragment that has two antigen binding fragments which are capable of cross-linking antigen, and a residual other fragment (which is termed pFc′). As used herein, “functional fragment” with respect to antibodies, refers to Fv, F(ab) and F(ab′) 2  fragments. 
     An “Fv” fragment is the minimum antibody fragment which contains a complete antigen recognition and binding site. This region consists of a dimer of one heavy and one light chain variable domain in a tight, non-covalent association (V H -V L  dimer). It is in this configuration that the three CDRs of each variable domain interact to define an antigen binding site on the surface of the V H -V L  dimer. Collectively, the six CDRs confer antigen binding specificity to the antibody. However, even a single variable domain (or half of an Fv comprising only three CDRs specific for an antigen) has the ability to recognize and bind antigen, although at a lower affinity than the entire binding site. 
     The Fab fragment [also designated as F(ab)] also contains the constant domain of the light chain and the first constant domain (CH1) of the heavy chain. Fab′ fragments differ from Fab fragments by the addition of a few residues at the carboxyl terminus of the heavy chain CH1 domain including one or more cysteines from the antibody hinge region. Fab′-SH is the designation herein for Fab′ in which the cysteine residue(s) of the constant domains have a free thiol group. F(ab′) fragments are produced by cleavage of the disulfide bond at the hinge cysteines of the F(ab′) 2  pepsin digestion product. Additional chemical couplings of antibody fragments are known to those of ordinary skill in the art. 
     The light chains of antibodies (immunoglobulin) from any vertebrate species can be assigned to one of two clearly distinct types, called kappa (.kappa.) and lambda (.lambda.), based on the amino sequences of their constant domain. 
     Depending on the amino acid sequences of the constant domain of their heavy chains, “immunoglobulins” can be assigned to different classes. There are at least five (5) major classes of immunoglobulins: IgA, IgD, IgE, IgG and IgM, and several of these may be further divided into subclasses (isotypes), e.g., IgG-1, IgG-2, IgG-3 and IgG4; IgA-1 and IgA-2. The heavy chains constant domains that correspond to the different classes of immunoglobulins are called α, Δ, ε, γ and μ, respectively. The subunit structures and three-dimensional configurations of different classes of immunoglobulins are well known. 
     The term “monoclonal antibody” as used herein refers to an antibody obtained from a population of substantially homogeneous antibodies, i.e., the individual antibodies comprising the population are identical except for possible naturally occurring mutations that may be present in minor amounts. Monoclonal antibodies are highly specific, being directed against a single antigenic site. Furthermore, in contrast to conventional (polyclonal) antibody preparations which typically include different antibodies directed against different determinants (epitopes), each monoclonal antibody is directed against a single determinant on the antigen. In additional to their specificity, the monoclonal antibodies are advantageous in that they are synthesized by the hybridoma culture, uncontaminated by other immunoglobulins. The modifier “monoclonal” indicates the character of the antibody as being obtained from a substantially homogeneous population of antibodies, and is not to be construed as requiring production of the antibody by any particular method. For example, the monoclonal antibodies to be used in accordance with the present invention may be made by the hybridoma method first described by Kohler and Milstein, Nature 256, 495 (1975), or may be made by recombinant methods, e.g., as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,816,567. The monoclonal antibodies for use with the present invention may also be isolated from phage antibody libraries using the techniques described in Clackson et al. Nature 352: 624-628 (1991), as well as in Marks et al., J. Mol. Biol. 222: 581-597 (1991). 
     Utilization of the monoclonal antibodies of the present invention may require administration of such or similar monoclonal antibody to a subject, such as a human. However, when the monoclonal antibodies are produced in a non-human animal, such as a rodent, administration of such antibodies to a human patient will normally elicit an immune response, wherein the immune response is directed towards the antibodies themselves. Such reactions limit the duration and effectiveness of such a therapy. In order to overcome such problem, the monoclonal antibodies of the present invention can be “humanized”, that is, the antibodies are engineered such that antigenic portions thereof are removed and like portions of a human antibody are substituted therefor, while the antibodies&#39; affinity for specific peptide/MHC complexes is retained. This engineering may only involve a few amino acids, or may include entire framework regions of the antibody, leaving only the complementarity determining regions of the antibody intact. Several methods of humanizing antibodies are known in the art and are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,180,370, issued to Queen et al on Jan. 30, 2001; 6,054,927, issued to Brickell on Apr. 25, 2000; 5,869,619, issued to Studnicka on Feb. 9, 1999; 5,861,155, issued to Lin on Jan. 19, 1999; 5,712,120, issued to Rodriquez et al on Jan. 27, 1998; and 4,816,567, issued to Cabilly et al on Mar. 28, 1989, the Specifications of which are all hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. 
     Humanized forms of antibodies are chimeric immunoglobulins, immunoglobulin chains or fragments thereof (such as Fv, Fab, Fab′, F(ab′)2 or other antigen-binding subsequences of antibodies) that are principally comprised of the sequence of a human immunoglobulin, and contain minimal sequence derived from a non-human immunoglobulin. Humanization can be performed following the method of Winter and co-workers (Jones et al., 1986; Riechmann et al., 1988; Verhoeyen et al., 1988), by substituting rodent CDRs or CDR sequences for the corresponding sequences of a human antibody. (See also U.S. Pat. No. 5,225,539.) In some instances, F v  framework residues of the human immunoglobulin are replaced by corresponding non-human residues. Humanized antibodies can also comprise residues which are found neither in the recipient antibody nor in the imported CDR or framework sequences. In general, the humanized antibody will comprise substantially all of at least one, and typically two, variable domains, in which all or substantially all of the CDR regions correspond to those of a non-human immunoglobulin and all or substantially all of the framework regions are those of a human immunoglobulin consensus sequence. The humanized antibody optimally also will comprise at least a portion of an immunoglobulin constant region (Fc), typically that of a human immunoglobulin (Jones et al., 1986; Riechmann et al., 1988; and Presta, 1992). 
     97 published articles relating to the generation or use of humanized antibodies were identified by a PubMed search of the database as of Apr. 25, 2002. Many of these studies teach useful examples of protocols that can be utilized with the present invention, such as Sandborn et al., Gatroenterology, 120:1330 (2001); Mihara et al., Clin. Immunol. 98:319 (2001); Yenari et al., Neurol. Res. 23:72 (2001); Morales et al., Nucl. Med. Biol. 27:199 (2000); Richards et al., Cancer Res. 59:2096 (1999); Yenari et al., Exp. Neurol. 153:223 (1998); and Shinkura et al., Anticancer Res. 18:1217 (1998), all of which are expressly incorporated in their entirety by reference. For example, a treatment protocol that can be utilized in such a method includes a single dose, generally administered intravenously, of 10-20 mg of humanized mAb per kg (Sandborn, et al. 2001). In some cases, alternative dosing patterns may be appropriate, such as the use of three infusions, administered once every two weeks, of 800 to 1600 mg or even higher amounts of humanized mAb (Richards et al., 1999). However, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited to the treatment protocols described above, and other treatment protocols which are known to a person of ordinary skill in the art may be utilized in the methods of the present invention. 
     The presently disclosed and claimed invention further includes fully human monoclonal antibodies against specific peptide/MHC complexes. Fully human antibodies essentially relate to antibody molecules in which the entire sequence of both the light chain and the heavy chain, including the CDRs, arise from human genes. Such antibodies are termed “human antibodies”, or “fully human antibodies” herein. Human monoclonal antibodies can be prepared by the trioma technique; the human B-cell hybridoma technique (see Kozbor, et al., Hybridoma, 2:7 (1983)) and the EBV hybridoma technique to produce human monoclonal antibodies (see Cole, et al., PNAS 82:859 (1985)). Human monoclonal antibodies may be utilized in the practice of the present invention and may be produced by using human hybridomas (see Cote, et al., PNAS 80:2026 (1983)) or by transforming human B-cells with Epstein Barr Virus in vitro (see Cole, et al., 1985). 
     In addition, human antibodies can also be produced using additional techniques, including phage display libraries (Hoogenboom et al., Nucleic Acids Res. 19:4133 (1991); Marks et al., J Mol. Biol. 222:581 (1991)). Similarly, human antibodies can be made by introducing human immunoglobulin loci into transgenic animals, e.g., mice in which the endogenous immunoglobulin genes have been partially or completely inactivated. Upon challenge, human antibody production is observed, which closely resembles that seen in humans in all respects, including gene rearrangement, assembly, and antibody repertoire. This approach is described, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,545,807; 5,545,806; 5,569,825; 5,625,126; 5,633,425; 5,661,016, and in Marks et al., J. Biol. Chem. 267:16007 (1992); Lonberg et al., Nature, 368:856 (1994); Morrison, 1994; Fishwild et al., Nature Biotechnol. 14:845 (1996); Neuberger, Nat. Biotechnol. 14:826 (1996); and Lonberg and Huszar, Int Rev Immunol. 13:65 (1995). 
     Human antibodies may additionally be produced using transgenic nonhuman animals which are modified so as to produce fully human antibodies rather than the animal&#39;s endogenous antibodies in response to challenge by an antigen. (See PCT publication WO 94/02602). The endogenous genes encoding the heavy and light immunoglobulin chains in the nonhuman host have been incapacitated, and active loci encoding human heavy and light chain immunoglobulins are inserted into the host&#39;s genome. The human genes are incorporated, for example, using yeast artificial chromosomes containing the requisite human DNA segments. An animal which provides all the desired modifications is then obtained as progeny by crossbreeding intermediate transgenic animals containing fewer than the full complement of the modifications. One embodiment of such a nonhuman animal is a mouse, and is termed the XENOMOUSE™ as disclosed in PCT publications WO 96/33735 and WO 96/34096. This animal produces B cells which secrete fully human immunoglobulins. The antibodies can be obtained directly from the animal after immunization with an immunogen of interest, as, for example, a preparation of a polyclonal antibody, or alternatively from immortalized B cells derived from the animal, such as hybridomas producing monoclonal antibodies. Additionally, the genes encoding the immunoglobulins with human variable regions can be recovered and expressed to obtain the antibodies directly, or can be further modified to obtain analogs of antibodies such as, for example, single chain Fv molecules. 
     An example of a method of producing a nonhuman host, exemplified as a mouse, lacking expression of an endogenous immunoglobulin heavy chain is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,939,598, issued to Kucherlapati et al. on Aug. 17, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference. It can be obtained by a method including deleting the J segment genes from at least one endogenous heavy chain locus in an embryonic stem cell to prevent rearrangement of the locus and to prevent formation of a transcript of a rearranged immunoglobulin heavy chain locus, the deletion being effected by a targeting vector containing a gene encoding a selectable marker; and producing from the embryonic stem cell a transgenic mouse whose somatic and germ cells contain the gene encoding the selectable marker. 
     A method for producing an antibody of interest, such as a human antibody, is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,916,771, issued to Hori et al. on Jun. 29, 1999, and incorporated herein by reference. It includes introducing an expression vector that contains a nucleotide sequence encoding a heavy chain into one mammalian host cell in culture, introducing an expression vector containing a nucleotide sequence encoding a light chain into another mammalian host cell, and fusing the two cells to form a hybrid cell. The hybrid cell expresses an antibody containing the heavy chain and the light chain. 
     The term “agent” is used herein to denote a chemical compound, a mixture of chemical compounds, a biological macromolecule, or an extract made from biological materials. 
     As used herein, the terms “label” or “labeled” refers to incorporation of a detectable marker, e.g., by incorporation of a radiolabeled amino acid or attachment to a polypeptide of biotinyl moieties that can be detected by marked avidin (e.g., streptavidin containing a fluorescent marker or enzymatic activity that can be detected by optical or calorimetric methods). In certain situations, the label or marker can also be therapeutic. Various methods of labeling polypeptides and glycoproteins are known in the art and may be used. Examples of labels for polypeptides include, but are not limited to, the following: radioisotopes or radionuclides (e.g.,  3 H,  14 C,  15 N,  35 S,  90 Y,  99 Tc,  111 In,  125 I,  131 I), fluorescent labels (e.g., FITC, rhodamine, lanthanide phosphors), enzymatic labels (e.g., horseradish peroxidase, β-galactosidase, luciferase, alkaline phosphatase), chemiluminescent, biotinyl groups, predetermined polypeptide epitopes recognized by a secondary reporter (e.g., leucine zipper pair sequences, binding sites for secondary antibodies, metal binding domains, epitope tags). In some embodiments, labels are attached by spacer arms of various lengths to reduce potential steric hindrance. 
     The term “pharmaceutical agent or drug” as used herein refers to a chemical compound or composition capable of inducing a desired therapeutic effect when properly administered to a patient. Other chemistry terms herein are used according to conventional usage in the art, as exemplified by The McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Chemical Terms (Parker, S., Ed., McGraw-Hill, San Francisco (1985)), incorporated herein by reference). 
     The term “antineoplastic agent” is used herein to refer to agents that have the functional property of inhibiting a development or progression of a neoplasm in a human, particularly a malignant (cancerous) lesion, such as a carcinoma, sarcoma, lymphoma, or leukemia. Inhibition of metastasis is frequently a property of antineoplastic agents. 
     As used herein, “substantially pure” means an object species is the predominant species present (i.e., on a molar basis it is more abundant than any other individual species in the composition), and preferably a substantially purified fraction is a composition wherein the object species comprises at least about 50 percent (on a molar basis) of all macromolecular species present. Generally, a substantially pure composition will comprise more than about 80 percent of all macromolecular species present in the composition, such as more than about 85%, 90%, 95%, and 99%. In one embodiment, the object species is purified to essential homogeneity (contaminant species cannot be detected in the composition by conventional detection methods) wherein the composition consists essentially of a single macromolecular species. 
     The term patient includes human and veterinary subjects. 
     A “liposome” is a small vesicle composed of various types of lipids, phospholipids and/or surfactant. The components of the liposome are commonly arranged in a bilayer formation, similar to the lipid arrangement of biological membranes. 
     “Treatment” refers to both therapeutic treatment and prophylactic or preventative measures. Those in need of treatment include those already with the disorder as well as those in which the disorder is to be prevented. 
     A “disorder” is any condition that would benefit from treatment with the polypeptide. This includes chronic and acute disorders or diseases including those pathological conditions which predispose the mammal to the disorder in question. 
     The terms “cancer” and “cancerous” refer to or describe the physiological condition in mammals that is typically characterized by unregulated cell growth. Examples of cancer include but are not limited to, carcinoma, lymphoma, blastoma, sarcoma, and leukemia. More particular examples of such cancers include squamous cell cancer, small-cell lung cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, pancreatic cancer, glioblastoma, cervical cancer, ovarian cancer, liver cancer, bladder cancer, hopatoma, breast cancer, colon cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial carcinoma, salivary gland carcinoma, kidney cancer, renal cancer, prostate cancer, vulval cancer, thyroid cancer, hepatic carcinoma and various types of head and neck cancer. 
     “Mammal” for purposes of treatment refers to any animal classified as a mammal, including human, domestic and farm animals, nonhuman primates, and zoo, sports, or pet animals, such as dogs, horses, cats, cows, etc. 
     As mentioned hereinabove, depending on the application and purpose, the T cell receptor mimic of the presently disclosed and claimed invention may be attached to any of various functional moieties. A T cell receptor mimic of the present invention attached to a functional moiety may be referred to herein as an “immunoconjugate”. In one embodiment, the functional moiety is a detectable moiety or a therapeutic moiety. 
     As is described and demonstrated in further detail hereinbelow, a detectable moiety or a therapeutic moiety may be particularly employed in applications of the present invention involving use of the T cell receptor mimic to detect the specific peptide/MHC complex, or to kill target cells and/or damage target tissues. 
     The present invention include the T cell receptor mimics described herein attached to any of numerous types of detectable moieties, depending on the application and purpose. For applications involving detection of the specific peptide/MHC complex, the detectable moiety attached to the T cell receptor mimic may be a reporter moiety that enables specific detection of the specific peptide/MHC complex bound by the T cell receptor mimic of the presently disclosed and claimed invention. 
     While various types of reporter moieties may be utilized to detect the specific peptide/MHC complex, depending on the application and purpose, the reporter moiety may be a fluorophore, an enzyme or a radioisotope. Specific reporter moieties that may utilized in accordance with the present invention include, but are not limited to, green fluorescent protein (GFP), alkaline phosphatase (AP), peroxidase, orange fluorescent protein (OFP), β-galactosidase, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), phycoerythrin, Cy-chrome, rhodamine, blue fluorescent protein (BFP), Texas red, horseradish peroxidase (HPR), and the like. 
     A fluorophore may be employed as a detection moiety enabling detection of the specific peptide/MHC complex via any of numerous fluorescence detection methods. Depending on the application and purpose, such fluorescence detection methods include, but are not limited to, fluorescence activated flow cytometry (FACS), immunofluorescence confocal microscopy, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH), fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET), and the like. 
     Various types of fluorophores, depending on the application and purpose, may be employed to detect the specific peptide/MHC complex. Examples of suitable fluorophores include, but are not limited to, phycoerythrin, fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), Cy-chrome, rhodamine, green fluorescent protein (GFP), blue fluorescent protein (BFP), Texas red, and the like. 
     Ample guidance regarding fluorophore selection, methods of linking fluorophores to various types of molecules, such as a T cell receptor mimic of the present invention, and methods of using such conjugates to detect molecules which are capable of being specifically bound by antibodies or antibody fragments comprised in such immunoconjugates is available in the literature of the art [for example, refer to: Richard P. Haugland, “Molecular Probes: Handbook of Fluorescent Probes and Research Chemicals 1992-1994”, 5th ed., Molecular Probes, Inc. (1994); U.S. Pat. No. 6,037,137 to Oncoimmunin Inc.; Hermanson, “Bioconjugate Techniques”, Academic Press New York, N.Y. (1995); Kay M. et al., 1995. Biochemistry 34:293; Stubbs et al., 1996. Biochemistry 35:937; Gakamsky D. et al., “Evaluating Receptor Stoichiometry by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer,” in “Receptors: A Practical Approach,” 2nd ed., Stanford C. and Horton R. (eds.), Oxford University Press, UK. (2001); U.S. Pat. No. 6,350,466 to Targesome, Inc.]. Therefore, no further description is considered necessary. 
     Alternately, an enzyme may be utilized as the detectable moiety to enable detection of the specific peptide/MHC complex via any of various enzyme-based detection methods. Examples of such methods include, but are not limited to, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA; for example, to detect the specific peptide/MHC complex in a solution), enzyme-linked chemiluminescence assay (for example, to detect the complex on solubilized cells), and enzyme-linked immunohistochemical assay (for example, to detect the complex in a fixed tissue). 
     Numerous types of enzymes may be employed to detect the specific peptide/MHC complex, depending on the application and purpose. Examples of suitable enzymes include, but are not limited to, horseradish peroxidase (HPR), β-galactosidase, and alkaline phosphatase (AP). Ample guidance for practicing such enzyme-based detection methods is provided in the literature of the art (for example, refer to: Khatkhatay M I. and Desai M., 1999. J Immunoassay 20:151-83; Wisdom G B., 1994. Methods Mol. Biol. 32:43340; Ishikawa E. et al., 1983. J Immunoassay 4:209-327; Oellerich M., 1980. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 18:197-208; Schuurs A H. and van Weemen B K., 1980. J Immunoassay 1:22949). 
     The present invention includes the T cell receptor mimics described herein attached to any of numerous types of therapeutic moieties, depending on the application and purpose. Various types of therapeutic moieties that may be utilized in accordance with the present invention include, but are not limited to, a cytotoxic moiety, a toxic moiety, a cytokine moiety, a bi-specific antibody moiety, and the like. Specific examples of therapeutic moieties that may be utilized in accordance with the present invention include, but are not limited to,  Pseudomonas  exotoxin, Diptheria toxin, interleukin 2, CD3, CD16, interleukin 4, interleukin 10, Ricin A toxin, and the like. 
     The functional moiety may be attached to the T cell receptor mimic of the present invention in various ways, depending on the context, application and purpose. A polypeptidic functional moiety, in particular a polypeptidic toxin, may be attached to the antibody or antibody fragment via standard recombinant techniques broadly practiced in the art (for Example, refer to Sambrook et al., infra, and associated references, listed in the Examples section which follows). A functional moiety may also be attached to the T cell receptor mimic of the presently disclosed and claimed invention using standard chemical synthesis techniques widely practiced in the art [for example, refer to the extensive guidelines provided by The American Chemical Society (for example at: http://www.chemistry.org/portal/Chemistry)]. One of ordinary skill in the art, such as a chemist, will possess the required expertise for suitably practicing such chemical synthesis techniques. 
     Alternatively, a functional moiety may be attached to the T cell receptor mimic by attaching an affinity tag-coupled T cell receptor mimic of the present invention to the functional moiety conjugated to a specific ligand of the affinity tag. Various types of affinity tags may be employed to attach the T cell receptor mimic to the functional moiety. In one embodiment, the affinity tag is a biotin molecule or a streptavidin molecule. A biotin or streptavidin affinity tag can be used to optimally enable attachment of a streptavidin-conjugated or a biotin-conjugated functional moiety, respectively, to the T cell receptor mimic due to the capability of streptavidin and biotin to bind to each other with the highest non covalent binding affinity known to man (i.e., with a Kd of about 10 −14  to 10 −15 ). 
     A pharmaceutical composition of the present invention includes a T cell receptor mimic of the present invention and a therapeutic moiety conjugated thereto. The pharmaceutical composition of the present invention may be an antineoplastic agent. A diagnostic composition of the present invention includes a T cell receptor mimic of the present invention and a detectable moiety conjugated thereto. 
     The present invention relates to methodologies for producing antibodies that function as T-cell receptor mimics (TCR m s) and recognize peptides displayed in the context of HLA molecules, wherein the peptide is associated with a tumorigenic, infectious or disease state. These antibodies will mimic the specificity of a T cell receptor (TCR) such that the molecules may be used as therapeutic, diagnostic and research reagents. In one embodiment, the T cell receptor mimics of the presently disclosed and claimed invention will have a higher binding affinity than a T cell receptor. In one embodiment, the T cell receptor mimic produced by the method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention has a binding affinity of about 10 nanomolar or greater. 
     The present invention is directed to a method of producing a T-cell receptor mimic. The method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention includes identifying a peptide of interest, wherein the peptide of interest is capable of being presented by an MHC molecule. Then, an immunogen comprising at least one peptide/MHC complex is formed, wherein the peptide of the peptide/MHC complex is the peptide of interest. An effective amount of the immunogen is then administered to a host for eliciting an immune response, and the immunogen retains a three-dimensional form thereof for a period of time sufficient to elicit an immune response against the three-dimensional presentation of the peptide in the binding groove of the MHC molecule. Serum collected from the host is assayed to determine if desired antibodies that recognize a three-dimensional presentation of the peptide in the binding groove of the MHC molecule are being produced. The desired antibodies can differentiate the peptide/MHC complex from the MHC molecule alone, the peptide alone, and a complex of MHC and irrelevant peptide. Finally, the desired antibodies are isolated. 
     The methods of the presently claimed and disclosed invention begin with the production of an immunogen. The immunogen comprises a peptide/MHC complex, wherein the 3-dimensional presentation of the peptide in the binding groove is the epitope recognized with high specificity by the antibody. The immunogen may be any form of a stable peptide/MHC complex that may be utilized for immunization of a host capable of producing antibodies to the immunogen, and the immunogen may be produced by any methods known to those skilled in the art. The immunogen is used in the construction of an agent that will activate a clinically relevant cellular immune response against the tumor cell which displays the particular peptide/MHC complex. 
     The peptide of interest may be associated with at least one of a tumorigenic state, an infectious state and a disease state, or the peptide of interest may be specific to a particular organ or tissue. The presentation of the peptide in context of an MHC molecule may be novel to cancer cells, or it may be greatly increased in cancer cells when compared to normal cells. 
     The peptide epitopes of the peptide/MHC complex of the immunogen may be antigens that have been discovered as being novel to cancer cells, and such peptide epitopes are present on the surface of cells associated with a tumorigenic, infectious or disease state, such as but not limited to cancer cells, and displayed in the context of MHC molecules. The peptide may be a known tumor antigen, or a peptide identified in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2002/0197672 A1, filed by Hildebrand et al. on Oct. 10, 2001 and published on Dec. 26, 2002; or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2005/0003483.A1, filed by Hildebrand et al. on May 13, 2004 and published on Jan. 6, 2005; or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2007/0099183 A1, filed by Hildebrand et al. on Nov. 17, 2006 and published on May 3, 2007; or U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2007/0099182 A1, filed by Hildebrand et al. on Nov. 1, 2006 and published on May 3, 2007; the contents of each of which are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entirety. Alternatively, the peptide may be a previously unidentified peptide that is identified by methods such as those described in the four Hildebrand et al. published applications incorporated immediately hereinabove by reference. 
     The immunogen may be produced in a manner so that it is stable, or it may be modified by various means to make it more stable. Two different methods of producing a stable form of an immunogen of the present invention will be described in more detail hereinbelow. However, it is to be understood that other methods, or variations of the below described methods, are within the ordinary skill of a person in the art and therefore fall within the scope of the present invention. 
     In one embodiment, the immunogen is produced by a cell-based approach through genetic engineering and recombinant expression, thus significantly increasing the half-life of the complex. The genetically-engineered and recombinantly expressed peptide/MHC complex may be chemically cross-linked to aid in stabilization of the complex. Alternatively or in addition to chemical cross-linking, the peptide/MHC complex may be genetically engineered such that the complex is produced in the form of a single-chain trimer. In this method, the MHC heavy chain, β-2 microglobulin and peptide are all produced as a single-chain trimer that is linked together. Methods of producing single-chain trimers are known in the art and are disclosed particularly in Yu et al. (2002). Other methods involve forming a single-chain dimer in which the peptide-β2m molecules are linked together, and in the single-chain dimer, the β2m molecule may or may not be membrane bound. 
     Therefore, in one embodiment, the step of forming an immunogen in the method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention may include recombinantly expressing the peptide/MHC complex in the form of a single chain trimer. In another embodiment, the step of forming an immunogen in the method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention may include recombinantly expressing the peptide/MHC complex and chemically cross-linking the peptide/MHC complex to aid in stabilization of the immunogen. In another embodiment, the step of forming the immunogen of the present invention includes recombinantly expressing the MHC heavy chain and the MHC light chain separately in  E. coli , and then refolding the MHC heavy and light chains with peptide in vitro. 
     In a second embodiment, the immunogen of the presently claimed and disclosed invention is produced by multimerizing two or more peptide/MHC complexes. The term “multimer” as used herein will be understood to include two or more copies of the peptide/MHC complex which are covalently or non-covalently attached together, either directly or indirectly. The MHC molecules of the complexes may be produced by any methods known in the art. Examples of MHC production include but are not limited to endogenous production and purification, or recombinant production and expression in host cells. In one embodiment, the MHC heavy chain and β2m molecules are expressed in  E. coli  and folded together with a synthesized peptide. In another embodiment, the peptide/MHC complex may be produced as the genetically-engineered single-chain trimer (or the single-chain dimer plus MHC heavy chain) described hereinabove. 
     For multimerizing the two or more copies of the peptide/MHC complex to form the immunogen, each of the peptide/MHC complexes may be modified in some manner known in the art to enable attachment of the peptide/MHC complexes to each other, or the multimer may be formed around a substrate to which each copy of the peptide/MHC complex is attached. When the peptide/MHC complexes are attached to a substrate, the desired antibodies should not recognize the substrate utilized in multimerization of the peptide/MHC complexes. A tail may be attached to the two or more peptide/MHC complexes to aid in multimerization, wherein the tail may be selected from the group including but not limited to, a biotinylation signal peptide tail, an immunoglobulin heavy chain tail, a TNF tail, an IgM tail, a Fos/Jun tail, and combinations thereof. The multimer can contain any desired number of peptide/MHC complexes and thus form any multimer desired, such as but not limited to, a dimer, a trimer, a tetramer, a pentamer, a hexamer, and the like. Specific examples of multimers which may be utilized in accordance with the present invention are described hereinbelow; however, these examples are not to be regarded as limiting, and other methods of multimerization known to those of skill in the art are also within the scope of the present invention. Streptavidin has four binding sites for biotin, so a BSP (biotinylation signal peptide) tail may be attached to the MHC molecule during production thereof, and a tetramer of the desired peptide/MHC complex could be formed by combining the peptide/MHC complexes with the BSP tails with biotin added enzymatically in vitro. An immunoglobulin heavy chain tail may be utilized as a substrate for forming a dimer, while a TNF tail may be utilized as a substrate for forming a trimer. An IgM tail could be utilized as a substrate for forming various combinations, such as tetramers, hexamers and pentamers. In addition, the peptide/MHC complexes may be multimerized through liposome encapsulation or artificial antigen presenting cell technology (see U.S. Ser. No. 10/050,231, filed by Hildebrand et al. on Jan. 16, 2002, the contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference). Further, the peptide/MHC complexes may be multimerized through the use of polymerized streptavidin and would produce what is termed a “streptamer” (see http://www.streptamer.com/streptamer/, which is hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference in its entirety). 
     The immunogen of the present invention may further be modified for providing better performance or for aiding in stabilization of the immunogen. Examples of modifications which may be utilized in accordance with the present invention include but are not limited to, modifying an anchor and/or tail in the peptide/MHC complex, modifying one or more amino acids in the peptide/MHC complex, PEGalation, chemical cross-linking, changes in pH or salt depending on the specific peptide of the peptide/MHC complex, addition of one or more chaperone proteins that stabilize certain peptide/MHC complexes, addition of one or more adjuvants that enhance immunogenicity (such as but not limited to the addition of a T cell epitope on a multimer), combinations thereof, and the like. 
     Once the immunogen is produced and stabilized, it is delivered to a host for eliciting an immune response. The host may be any animal known in the art that is useful in biotechnological screening assays and is capable of producing recoverable antibodies when administered an immunogen, such as but not limited to, rabbits, mice, rats, hamsters, monkeys, baboons and humans. In one embodiment, the host is a mouse, such as a Balb/c mouse or a transgenic mouse. In another embodiment, the mouse is transgenic for the particular MHC molecule of the immunogen so as to minimize the antigenicity of the immunogen, thereby ensuring that the 3-dimensional domain of the peptide sitting in the binding pocket of the MHC molecule is the focus of the antibodies generated thereto and thus is preferentially recognized with high specificity. In yet another embodiment, the mouse is transgenic and produces human antibodies, thereby greatly easing the development work for creating a human therapeutic. 
     After the host is immunized and allowed to elicit an immune response to the immunogen, a screening assay is performed to determine if the desired antibodies are being produced. In one embodiment, the assay requires four components plus the sera of the mouse to be screened. The four components include: (A) a binding/capture material (such as but not limited to, streptavidin, avidin, biotin, etc.) coated on wells of a solid support, such as a microtiter plate; (B) properly folded HLA trimer (HLA heavy chain plus β2m plus peptide) molecule containing an irrelevant peptide; (C) properly folded HLA tetramer or trimer containing the peptide of interest; and (D) at least one antibody which recognizes mouse IgG and IgA constant regions and is covalently linked to a disclosing agent, such as but not limited to, peroxidase or alkaline phosphatase. 
     The solid support of (A) must be able to bind the HLA molecule of interest in such a way as to present the peptide and the HLA to an antibody without stearic or other hindrance. One configuration of the properly folded HLA trimers in (B) and (C) above is a single-site biotinylation. If single-site biotinylation cannot be achieved, then other methods of capture, such as antibody may be used. If antibody is used to capture the HLA molecule onto the solid support, it cannot cross-react with the anti-mouse IgG and IgA in (D) above. 
     Prior to assaying the serum from immunized mice, it is preferred that the bleeds from the immunized mice be preabsorbed to remove antibodies that are not peptide specific. The preabsorption step should remove antibodies that are reactive to epitopes present on any component of the immunogen other than the peptide, including but not limited to, β2m, HLA heavy chain, a substrate utilized for multimerization, an immunogen stabilizer, and the like. 
     One embodiment of methods of assaying serum from immunized mice is described in the attached figures (see for example  FIG. 5 ), as well as in the Examples provided hereinafter. Once it is determined that the desired antibodies are being produced, a standard hybridoma fusion protocol can be employed to generate cells producing monoclonal antibodies. These cells are plated such that individual clones can be identified, selected as individuals, and grown up in individual wells in plates. The supernatants from these cells can then be screened for production of antibodies of the desired specificity. These hybridoma cells can also be grown as individual clones and mixed and sorted or grown in bulk and sorted as described below for cells expressing surface immunoglobulin of the desired reactivity. 
     In another embodiment of the present invention, cell sorting is utilized to isolate desired B cells, such as B memory cells, prior to hybridoma formation. One method of sorting which may be utilized in accordance with the present invention is FACS sorting, as B memory cells have immunoglobulin on their surface, and this specificity may be utilized to identify and capture these cells. FACS sorting is a preferred method as it involves two color staining. Optionally, beads can be coated with peptide/HLA complex (with FITC or PE) and attached to a column, and B cells with immunoglobulin on their surface can be identified by FACS as well as by binding to the complex. In yet another alternative, a sorting method using magnetic beads, such as those produced by Dynal or Miltenyi, may be utilized. 
     In another embodiment of the present invention, the sorted B cells may further be differentiated and expanded into plasma cells, which secrete antibodies, screened for specificity and then used to create hybridomas or have their antibody genes cloned for expression in recombinant form. 
     Therefore, the step of isolating the desired antibodies of the presently disclosed and claimed invention may further include a method for isolating at least one of B cells expressing surface immunoglobulin, B memory cells, hybridoma cells and plasma cells producing the desired antibodies. The step of isolating the B memory cells may include sorting the B memory cells using at least one of FACS sorting, beads coated with peptide/MHC complex, magnetic beads, and intracellular staining. The method may further include the step of differentiating and expanding the B memory cells into plasma cells. 
     The method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention may further include the step of assaying the isolated desired antibodies to confirm their specificity and to determine if the isolated desired antibodies cross-react with other MHC molecules. 
     Once the antibodies are sorted, they are assayed to confirm that they are specific for one peptide/MHC complex and to determine if they exhibit any cross reactivity with other HLA molecules. One method of conducting such assays is a sera screen assay as described in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. US 2004/0126829 A1, filed by Hildebrand et al. on Sep. 24, 2003 and published on Jul. 1, 2004, the contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated herein by reference. However, other methods of assaying for quality control are within the skill of a person of ordinary skill in the art and therefore are also within the scope of the present invention. 
     The present invention is also directed to a T cell receptor mimic that includes an antibody or antibody fragment reactive against a specific peptide/MHC complex, wherein the antibody or antibody fragment can differentiate the specific peptide/MHC complex from the MHC molecule alone, the peptide alone, and a complex of MHC and an irrelevant peptide. The T cell receptor mimic is produced by immunizing a host with an effective amount of an immunogen comprising a multimer of two or more specific peptide/MHC complexes. The immunogen may be in the form of a tetramer. The peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may be associated with at least one of a tumorigenic state, an infectious state and a disease state, or the peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may be specific to a particular organ or tissue. Alternatively, the presentation of the peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex in the context of an MHC molecule may be novel to cancer cells, or may be greatly increased in cancer cells when compared to normal cells. The peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may comprise any of SEQ ID NOS:1-13. 
     In one embodiment, the T cell receptor mimic may have at least one functional moiety, such as but not limited to, a detectable moiety or a therapeutic moiety, bound thereto. For example but not by way of limitation, the detectable moiety may be selected from the group consisting of a fluorophore, an enzyme, a radioisotope and combinations thereof, while the therapeutic moiety may be selected from the group consisting of a cytotoxic moiety, a toxic moiety, a cytokine moiety, a bi-specific antibody moiety, and combinations thereof. 
     The present invention is also directed to a hybridoma cell or a B cell producing a T cell receptor mimic comprising an antibody or antibody fragment reactive against a specific peptide/MHC complex, wherein the antibody or antibody fragment can differentiate the specific peptide/MHC complex from the MHC molecule alone, the peptide alone, and a complex of MHC and an irrelevant peptide. The peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may be associated with at least one of a tumorigenic state, an infectious state and a disease state, or the peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may be specific to a particular organ or tissue. Alternatively, the presentation of the peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex in the context of an MHC molecule may be novel to cancer cells, or may be greatly increased in cancer cells when compared to normal cells. The peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may comprise any of SEQ ID NOS:1-13. 
     The present invention is further directed to an isolated nucleic acid segment encoding a T cell receptor mimic comprising an antibody or antibody fragment reactive against a specific peptide/MHC complex, wherein the antibody or antibody fragment can differentiate the specific peptide/MHC complex from the MHC molecule alone, the peptide alone, and a complex of MHC and an irrelevant peptide. The peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may be associated with at least one of a tumorigenic state, an infectious state and a disease state, or the peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may be specific to a particular organ or tissue. Alternatively, the presentation of the peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex in the context of an MHC molecule may be novel to cancer cells, or may be greatly increased in cancer cells when compared to normal cells. The peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may comprise any of SEQ ID NOS:1-13. 
     The present invention is also related to an immunogen used in production of a T cell receptor mimic. The immunogen includes a multimer of two or more identical peptide/MHC complexes, such as a tetramer, wherein the peptide/MHC complexes are capable of retaining their 3-dimensional form for a period of time sufficient to elicit an immune response in a host such that antibodies that recognize a three-dimensional presentation of the peptide in the binding groove of the MHC molecule are produced. The antibodies so produced are capable of differentiating the peptide/MHC complex from the MHC molecule alone, the peptide alone, and a complex of MHC and irrelevant peptide. The peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may be associated with at least one of a tumorigenic state, an infectious state and a disease state, or the peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may be specific to a particular organ or tissue. Alternatively, the presentation of the peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex in the context of an MHC molecule may be novel to cancer cells, or may be greatly increased in cancer cells when compared to normal cells. The peptide of the specific peptide/MHC complex may comprise any of SEQ ID NOS:1-13. 
     The present invention also includes a predictive screen to determine if a particular peptide can be utilized in an immunogen of the present invention for producing the desired antibodies which act as T-cell receptor mimics. These screens include but are not limited to, stability, refolding, IC 50 , K d , and the like. The present invention may provide a threshold of binding affinity of peptide so that a predictive threshold can be created for examining entire proteins of interest for potential peptides. This threshold can also be used as a predictor of yield that can be obtained in the refolding process of producing the peptide/MHC complex. In addition, if a potential peptide is shown to be low to medium in the predictive screens, methods of modifying the immunogen can be attempted at the onset of the production of immunogen. 
     The TCR mimics of the present invention have a variety of uses. The TCR mimic reagents could be utilized in a variety of vaccine-related uses. In one embodiment, the TCR mimics could be utilized as direct therapeutic agents, either as an antibody or bispecific molecule. In another embodiment, the TCR mimics of the present invention could be utilized for carcinogenic profiling, to provide an individualized approach to cancer detection and treatment. The term “carcinogenic profiling” as used herein refers to the screening of cancer cells with TCRm&#39;s of various specificities to define a set of peptide/MHC complexes on the tumor. In another embodiment, the TCR mimics of the present invention could be utilized for vaccine validation, as a useful tool to determine whether desired T cell epitopes are displayed on cells such as but not limited to, tumor cells, viral infected cells, parasite infected cells, and the like. The TCR mimics of the present invention could also be used as research reagents to understand the fate of antigen processing and presentation in vivo and in vitro, and these processes could be evaluated between solid tumor cells, metastatic tumor cells, cells exposed to chemo-agents, tumor cells after exposure to a vaccine, and the like. The TCR mimics of the present invention could also be utilized as vehicles for drug transport to transport payloads of toxic substances to tumor cells or viral infected cells. Further, the TCR mimics of the present invention could also be utilized as diagnostic reagents for identifying tumor cells, viral infected cells, and the like. In addition, the TCR mimic reagents of the present invention could also be utilized in metabolic typing, such as but not limited to, to identify disease-induced modifications to antigen processing and presentation as well as peptide-HLA presentation and tumor sensitivity to drugs. 
     The present invention is also directed to a method of mediating lysis of cells expressing at least one specific peptide/MHC complex on a surface thereof. The method includes providing a T cell receptor mimic described herein (wherein the T cell receptor mimic is reactive against a specific peptide/MHC complex), and contacting the cells expressing at least one specific peptide/MHC complex on a surface thereof with the T cell receptor mimic, such that the T cell receptor mimic mediates lysis of the cells expressing the at least one specific peptide/MHC complex on a surface thereof. 
     The present invention is also directed to a method of detecting at least one cell expressing at least one specific peptide/MHC complex on a surface thereof. The method includes providing a T cell receptor mimic as described herein (wherein the T cell receptor mimic is reactive against a specific peptide/MHC complex), and contacting a population of cells with the T cell receptor mimic, such that the T cell receptor mimic binds to the surface of any cells present expressing the at least one specific peptide/MHC complex thereon and is detectable in said bound state. 
     The present invention is also directed to a method of validating an epitope as being associated with an infectious or tumorigenic state. The method includes providing a peptide of interest that is potentially an epitope associated with an infectious state and producing a T cell receptor mimic against a complex of the peptide of interest/MHC, wherein the T cell receptor mimic is produced as described herein above. Infected or tumor cells are then contacted with the T cell receptor mimic to determine if the T cell receptor mimic binds to a surface of at least one infected/tumor cell, wherein the binding of the T cell receptor mimic to an infected/tumor cell confirms the presence of the peptide of interest/MHC complex on the surface of the at least one infected/tumor cell, thereby validating the peptide of interest as an epitope associated with the infectious or tumorigenic state. 
     Examples are provided hereinbelow. However, the present invention is to be understood to not be limited in its application to the specific experimentation, results and laboratory procedures. Rather, the Examples are simply provided as one of various embodiments and is meant to be exemplary, not exhaustive. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE I 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Peptides Utilized in the Methods of the Present Invention (Examples 1-4) 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                 SEQ 
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 ID 
                   
                   
                   
                 Tetramer 
               
               
                 Name 
                 Sequence 
                 NO: 
                 Origin 
                 Position 
                 IC 50 * 
                 Yield (mg) 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 p53 (264) 
                 LLGRNSFEV 
                 1 
                 Tumor suppressor p53 
                 (264-272) 
                 1273 
                 1.99 +/− 0.76 
               
               
                 eIF4G 
                 VLMTEDIKL 
                 2 
                 eukaryotic transcription 
                 (720-728) 
                 690.3 
                 2.77 +/− 1.09 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 initiation factor 4 gamma 
               
               
                 Her2/neu 
                 KIFGSLAFL 
                 3 
                 tyrosine kinase-type cell 
                 (369-377) 
                 881.9 
                 0.89 +/− 0.69 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 surface receptor Her2 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 (EC 2.7.1.112) (C-erbB- 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 2) 
               
               
                 TMT 
                 TMTRVLQGV 
                 4 
                 human chorionic 
                 (40-48) 
                 1862 
                 2-3 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 gonadotropin-β 
               
               
                 VLQ 
                 VLQGVLPAL 
                 5 
                 human chorionic 
                 (44-53) 
                 914.1 
                 2-3 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 gonadotropin-β 
               
               
                 GVL 
                 GVLPALPQV 
                 6 
                 human chorionic 
                 (47-55) 
                 926.8 
                 2-3 
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 gonadotropin-β 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 *Peptide IC 50  values less than 5000 are considered high affinity binders. 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Example 1 
     The human p53 protein is an intracellular tumor suppressor protein. Point mutations in the p53 gene inactivate or reduce the effectiveness of the p53 protein and leave cells vulnerable to transformation during progression towards malignancy. As cells attempt to compensate for a lack of active p53, over production of the p53 protein is common to many human cancers including breast cancer, resulting in cytoplasmic increases in p53 peptide fragments such as the peptide 264-272. There are many reports demonstrating that surface HLA-A2 presents the 264-peptide epitope from wild-type p53 (Theobald et al., 1995; and Theobald et al., 1998). Cytotoxic T lymphocytes have been generated against the 264-peptide-HLA-A2 complexes (referred to herein as 264p-HLA-A2) on breast cancer cells from peripheral blood monolayer cells (PBMC) of healthy donors and individuals with breast cancer (Nikitina et al., 2001; Barfoed et al., 2000; and Gnjatic et al., 1998). Further, several studies have reported successful immunization with the 264 peptide in HLA-A2 transgenic mice (Yu et al., 1997; and Hoffmann et al., 2005). The studies were successful in generated murine CTL lines reactive against the 264p-HLA-A2 complex and showed that these murine CTL lines could detect and destroy human breast cancer cells. Because the 264-peptide presented by HLA-A2 on the surface of malignant cells is recognized by the immune system and it has relatively high affinity (IC 50 &lt;1 nM) (Chikamatsu et al., 1999), the 264 peptide was utilized in Example 1 to construct 264p-HLA-A2 tetramers for use in immunizing mice for production of T cell receptor mimics in accordance with the present invention. 
     Preparation of 264p-HLA-A2 peptide tetramers: The heavy and light (β2m) chains of the HLA-A2 Class I molecule were expressed and prepared separately in  E. coli  as insoluble inclusion bodies according to established protocols. The inclusion bodies were dissolved in 10 M urea, and the heavy and light chains were mixed at a molar ratio of 1:2 at a concentration of 1 and 2 mM respectively with 10 mg of a synthetic peptide (LLGRNSFEV; SEQ ID NO:1) from the human p53 tumor suppressor protein (amino acids 264-272) in a protein refolding buffer and were allowed to refold over 60 hr at 4° C. with stirring. The filtrate of this mix was concentrated, and the buffer was exchanged with 10 mM Tris pH 8.0. The mix was biotinylated using a recombinant birA ligase for two hours at room temperature and then subjected to size exclusion chromatography on a Sephadex S-75 column (Superdex S-75, Amersham GE Health Sciences) ( FIG. 1 ). Alternatively, a monomer HLA-A2-peptide can be purified from a Sephadex S-75 column, concentrated and then biotinylated using birA ligase for 2 hours at room temperature. The refolded biotinylated monomer peak was reisolated on the S-75 column and then multimerized with streptavidin (SA) at a 4:1 molar ratio. The multimerized sample was subjected to size exclusion chromatography on a Sephadex S-200 column ( FIG. 2 ). 
     The stability of the 264p-HLA-A2 tetramers was assessed in mouse serum at different temperatures using the conformational antibodies BB7.2 and W6/32 ( FIG. 3 ). The results suggest that 50% of the 264p-HLA-A2 tetramers maintain a conformational integrity after 10 h incubation at 37° C. Only 10% of tetramers remain stable after 40 h incubation. However, the multimerization of 264p-HLA-A2 greatly increased the half life of the molecules; normally monomers only have a few hours half life in mouse serum. It was not clear a priori that these tetramers would be stable long enough to elicit a robust immune response in mouse, but recent results indicated that at least a fraction of the injected tetramers were stable long enough in mice to elicit a specific antibody response. 
     Immunization of Balb/c mice (female and male) with peptide-HLA-A2: The complete structure of the peptide-HLA-A2 tetramer immunogen is shown in  FIG. 4 . Balb/c mice (female and male) were immunized with the 264p-HLA-A2 tetramers. Each mouse was injected subcutaneously every 2 weeks (up to 5 times) with immunogen (50 μg) in PBS which also contained 25 μg of Quil A (adjuvant) in 100 μl. 
     Blood samples from mice were collected into 1.5 ml eppendorf microcentrifuge tubes containing heparin, and plasma was clarified by centrifugation at 6,000×g for 10 minutes. The recovered plasma samples were then frozen at −20° C. and later used in screening assays. Samples were diluted 1:200 into 0.5% milk in Phosphate Buffered Saline solution (PBS) and pre-absorbed with refolded monomer HLA-A2 containing an irrelevant peptide (Her2/neu) before screening. 
     Effective assays were needed to analyze anti-peptide-HLA antibodies in the serum of immunized mice, and several factors complicate this analysis. One of these factors is predicated on the fact that a specific antibody response against a complex epitope represented by both the peptide and the binding site of the HLA molecule is being sought, and this epitope may represent only a minor target to B cells. A significant portion of the antibodies raised against peptide-HLA tetramers are generated against HLA as well as streptavidin (SA) utilized to tetramerize the peptide-HLA complexes; consequently, an assay protocol had to be developed that allowed for detection of a low concentration of specific antibodies in a milieu of non-specific ones. To resolve this problem, a pre-absorption step was incorporated into an ELISA assay format. This step was designed to remove antibodies against HLA and β2-microglobulin from the reaction. In a variation of this assay, biotinylated non-relevant monomers were used to pre-absorb and then remove the formed complexes from the reaction on a sold surface-bound SA. In the ELISA format, sera from immunized mice are first reacted with HLA-A2 monomers containing another irrelevant peptide before reacting them with HLA-A2 complexes of the relevant peptide. The specifics of these assays are described in more detail herein below. 
     Pre-Absorption assay: Serum from the immunized mice was used in an ELISA format to identify “peptide-specific” antibody responses. Remember that TCR mimics are antibodies having dual specificity for both peptide and HLA. In addition, the immunized mice will produce antibody specificities against HLA epitopes. It is these antibodies that the pre-absorption protocol substantially removes from the serum samples. In order to substantially remove antibodies that were not peptide specific, a pre-absorption step was included in the protocol. It was assumed that 12 μg of IgG is present in 1 ml of mouse serum, and that 10% of the IgG in immunized mouse serum is specific for an epitope on the peptide-HLA-A2 immunogen. Based on these assumptions, 1.2 μg of IgG in 1 ml of serum from an immunized mouse is potentially specific for some position on the peptide-A2 molecules and is not “peptide specific”. In order to remove these non-specific antibodies, 20 μg of biotinylated Her2/neu-peptide-HLA-A2 (which differs from 264p-HLA-A2 only in the peptide) was added to 1 ml of a 1:200 dilution of each mouse bleed. Samples were incubated overnight at 4° C. with agitation. The next morning 0.5 ml of sample was added to a well in a 12 well plate (which had been coated the previous night with 10 mg of streptavidin and blocked in 5% milk protein) and incubated for 1 hour. The pre-absorbed samples were then transferred to a second streptavidin coated well on the plate. This process was repeated one more time (a total of 3) to ensure efficient removal of antibody-HLA complexes and antibodies reactive to streptavidin and/or biotin. After completing the pre-absorption steps, samples were ready for use in the screening ELISA. 
     Screening ELISA:  FIG. 5  demonstrates the development of an ELISA assay for screening mouse bleeds to determine if there are antibodies specific to the peptide-of-interest-HLA-molecule complex present. Pre-absorbed serum samples from six Balb/c mice were individually tested in the ELISA screening assay of  FIG. 5  (see  FIG. 6 ). Briefly, 96 well plates (maxisorb; Nunc) were coated the night before with 0.5 μg of either biotinylated 264p-HLA-A2 monomer or biotinylated eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 monomer at 4° C. (Subsequence interactions used non-biotinylated forms of the relevant and irrelevant HLAs.) The following day, wells were blocked with 1% milk for 1 h at room temperature and rinsed 1× in PBS. The pre-absorbed serum samples (50 μl/well) were then added to wells starting at 1:200 dilution and titrating down to a final dilution equivalent to either 1:1600 or 1:3200. After 2 hr incubation at room temperature, the plate was washed 2× in PBS followed by the addition of antibody conjugate (goat anti-mouse-HRP, 1:500 dilution) and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. The plate was then washed 3× in PBS and developed after addition of 50 μl of tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) substrate. Development time was 5 to 10 minutes, and the reaction was stopped with the addition of 50 μl quench buffer (2 M sulfuric acid). The results were read at 450 nm absorbance ( FIG. 6 ). 
     For a positive control in the assay, BB7.2 mAb was used at 50 to 200 ng/well. This mAb recognizes only conformationally correct forms of the refolded peptide-HLA-A2 molecule. For a negative control in the assay, a peptide-HLA-A2 complex containing an irrelevant peptide was coated on the plate. In this particular assay, the negative control was eIF4G peptide-loaded HLA-A2 monomer. 
     In addition, the mice used for the production of the antibodies were pre-bled in order to ensure that Balb/c mice do not harbor antibodies specific for the desired antigens before immunization. Assay background was determined using pre-bleed samples at 1:200 and 1:400 dilution. The highest absorbance reading recorded for pre-bleeds was less than OD 0.06 at 450 nm. 
       FIG. 6  shows the results from an ELISA of six individual bleeds from Balb/c mice immunized with tetramers of 264p-HLA-A2. The data shown in  FIG. 6  demonstrates that both male and female mice immunized with 264p-HLA-A2 tetramers make specific antibody to 264p-HLA-A2 monomers. Bleeds incubated in wells containing eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 monomers (irrelevant peptide) were used to evaluate non-specific reactivity of bleeds. The findings shown in  FIG. 6  demonstrate minimal reactivity to eIF4 Gp/A2 with signal to noise ratios ranging from 3 to 6 fold, indicating that immunization of mice with peptide-A2 tetramers leads to the generation of specific antibody responses to the immunogen. 
     The results presented in  FIG. 6  demonstrate that antibodies in the serum reacted twice as strongly or stronger with 264p-HLA-A2 as compared to eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2, suggesting that some specific antibodies against the p53-264p epitope are present. The larger the difference in the response between reactivity with HLA-A2 complexes with a relevant or irrelevant peptide, the higher the titer for specific antibodies in the sera. The results in  FIG. 6  clearly demonstrate that serially diluted sera from all six mice generated a signal with 264p-HLA-A2 monomers that was 2-5 times stronger than the signal with eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 monomers, clearly demonstrating the effectiveness of the methods of the present invention. 
     T2 binding assay: To confirm the ELISA findings, the binding of the different mouse bleed samples to T2 cells pulsed with either the 264 peptide (peptide of interest) or the eIF4G peptide (irrelevant peptide) was investigated, as shown in  FIG. 7 . T2 cells are a human B lymphoblastoid cell line (ATCC CRL-1999) that has been well characterized by Peter Creswell (Wei et al., 1992). T2 cells are useful for studying recognition of HLA-A2 antigens because they are deficient in peptide loading. These cells have been found to be deficient in TAP1/2 proteins, which are necessary proteins for transporting peptides from the cytosol into the endoplasmic reticulum for loading HLA class I molecules. Because of the TAP1/2 deficiency, these cells express a low level of empty HLA-A2 molecules on the surface. Thus, these cells can be primed (loaded) with peptides of choice, and the cells will display them appropriately in the context of HLA-A2 molecules on their surface. Addition of peptide to these cells leads to peptide binding to the HLA-A2 molecules which are constantly cycling to the surface and stabilization of the HLA-A2 structure. The more stable structure increases the density of surface displayed HLA-A2 molecules that are loaded with the particular peptide of interest. T2 cells can be loaded with relevant or irrelevant peptide, and the reactivity of immune sera from immunized mice against them can be measured. The larger the difference in the response between T2 cells loaded with relevant or irrelevant peptide, the higher the titer for specific antibodies in the sera. 
     T2 cells were loaded with either the 264 or the eIF4G peptide, and then the cells were stained with the BB7.2 antibody to detect the level of HLA-A2 molecules present on the surface of T2 cells.  FIG. 8  shows that both 264 and eIF4G peptides have been successfully loaded by comparing the BB7.2 staining profile of cells that received peptide versus the cells that did not receive peptide (negative controls). These findings demonstrate that eIF4G peptide may be more efficient at loading and stabilizing HLA-A2 on T2 cells than the 264 peptide. 
       FIG. 9  illustrates the results of staining of 264 peptide-loaded T2 cells with the 13M2 mouse bleed. The pre-absorbed mouse sample preferentially binds cells pulsed with 264 peptide. In contrast,  FIG. 10  demonstrates that the pre-bleed samples (mice bleeds taken prior to immunization) show no sign of reactivity to T2 cells pulsed with either the 264- or eIF4G peptide. In combination, these results clearly demonstrate that a polyclonal peptide-HLA specific antibody response can be generated to the specific three-dimensional, and that these antibodies are specific for the immunogen that was used. They confirm that the antibodies produced also recognize a “native” or natural form of the peptide-HLA-A2 complex and are not restricted in reactivity to the refolded form used to prepare the immunogen. 
     Hybridomas were generated by submitting 12 mice immunized with 264p-HLA-A2 to the Hybridoma Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, Okla., for hybridoma generation using standard technology. In total, the center returned 1440 supernatants from p53-264 hybridoma isolates for screening.  FIG. 11  depicts development of assays to screen hybridomas to determine if they are producing anti-peptide-HLA specific antibodies. In a primary ELISA screen, 40 positives were identified, and in a secondary screen, 7 positives against 264p-HLA-A2 were identified. The results from screening hybridoma supernatants by a competitive binding ELISA are shown in  FIG. 12 . Supernatants that had ratios of eIF4G/264 greater than 1.7 were considered positive, and after expanding hybridoma numbers, the supernatant was re-screened. Approximately 1500 wells were screened, and approximately 50 positives were identified after the primary screen. 
     Hybridomas determined positive after a first screening were expanded, and the supernatant was diluted and rescreened by competitive ELISA two weeks after cell growth.  FIG. 13  represents data obtained from a competitive ELISA of these positive hybridoma clones. TCRm&#39;s specific for 264p-HLA-A2 were determined by showing a reduction in absorbance (read at 450 nm) after addition of competitor (no tetramer versus 264p tetramer), while no change in absorbance was observed after addition of non-competitor (no tetramer versus eIF4 Gp tetramer). These findings confirm anti-264p-HLA-A2 specificity of TCRm&#39;s and validate the protocols of the presently disclosed and claimed invention for generating monoclonal antibodies specific for peptide-HLA complexes. 
     Supernatant from I3.M3-2A6 was characterized further by a cell-based competitive binding assay, as shown in  FIG. 14 . These findings demonstrate that I3.M3.2A6 TCRm has specificity for the authentic 264p-HLA-A2 epitope. This is illustrated by the significant reduction of TCRm binding to 264p pulsed T2 cells in the presence of the competitor versus the non-competitor. The competitor reduces binding by greater than 3.5 fold (as measured by mean channel fluorescence) compared to the effect of an equivalent amount of non-competitor. 
     Therefore, the results presented herein in Example 1 clearly demonstrate that the immunogen of the present invention is capable of eliciting an immune response in a host that is specific for an epitope formed by a desired peptide presented in the context of an HLA molecule. 
     These results also indicate there is a significant component of the antibody reactivity in most of the immunized mice that recognizes epitopes that are not specific to the peptide in the context of the HLA binding groove. Rather, these antibodies probably recognize other epitopes common to properly folded HLA-A2 molecules (independent of the peptide region) or epitopes which form as the immunogen is processed, unfolded and denatured in the body. 
     Appropriate measures must be taken to remove these “non-peptide-specific” antibodies from the serum prior to evaluating it for the presence of a true TCR mimic antibody. The ability to discover an antibody which recognizes the peptide of interest in its authentic three-dimensional configuration when the HLA-binding groove is dependent upon (1) the creation of an immunogen capable of presenting the peptide in this context, and (2) the ability to prepare the serum from the immunized animal in such a way that the peptide specific reactivity is revealed. 
     Example 2 
     The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma (eIF4G) is a protein which is part of a complex of molecules that are critical in regulating translation. When breast carcinoma cell lines (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) were stressed with serum starvation, the eIF4G protein degrades into smaller peptide fragments (Morley et al., 2000; Morley et al., 2005; Bushell et al., 2000; and Clemens, 2004). A peptide of eIF4G has been identified as being presented by HLA molecules on HIV infected cells at a higher frequency than in uninfected cells by the epitope discovery method of Hildebrand et al. (US Patent Application Publication No. US 2002/0197672 A1, which has previously been incorporated herein by reference). The epitope discovery methodology is shown in  FIG. 15 . Briefly, an expression construct encoding a secreted HLA molecule is transfected into a normal cell line and an infected, diseased or cancerous cell line (in this case, an HIV infected cell line), and the cell lines are cultured at high density in hollow-fiber bioreactors. Then, the secreted HLA molecules are harvested and affinity purified, and the peptides bound therein are eluted. The peptides from the uninfected cell line and the HIV infected cell line are then comparatively mapped using mass spectroscopy to identify peptides that are presented by HLA at a higher frequency in the HIV infected than in the uninfected cells. Using this method, the peptide VLMTEDIKL (SEQ ID NO:2), was identified, and determined to be a peptide fragment of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4 gamma (eIF4G). The peptide of SEQ ID NO:2 is referred to herein as the “eIF4G peptide”, or “eIF4 Gp”. 
     Monomers and tetramers of eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complexes were produced in a similar manner as described in Example 1 for the 264p-HLA-A2 complexes. Briefly, 10 mg (10 μM) of peptide were refolded with 46 mg (1 μM) of HLA-A2 heavy chain and 28 mg (2 μM) of HLA light chain under appropriate redox conditions over approximately 60 hours at 4° C. The monomers were biotinylated and multimerized with streptavidin to form tetramers, and the tetramers were purified on a Superdex S200 column. Under the abovementioned conditions, typically 10-20 mg properly folded monomer, 8-12 mg of biotinylated monomer, and 2-3 mg of tetramers were produced. 
     Tetramer stability was assessed as described in Example 1 for the 264p-HLA-A2 tetramers. In contrast to the 264p-HLA-A2 tetramers, which have a half life of 10 hours at 37° C., eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramers have a half life of 20 hours, and 40% of tetramers remain stable after 40 hours of incubation. 
     The eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramers were utilized to immunize Balb/c mice as described in Example 1, and the mice were bled and sera assayed using the ELISA method described above in Example 1 and in  FIG. 5 . Sera from a mouse immunized with eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramers was pre-absorbed with biotinylated 264p-HLA-A2 monomers. The serum was reacted with SA on a solid surface and then used in an ELISA format. Serum was reacted with solid surface bound (1) 264p-HLA-A2 monomers; (2) eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 monomers; or (3) Her2/neu-peptide-HLA-A2 monomers, and the bound antibody was detected with a goat anti mouse (GAM)-HRP conjugate antibody. The ELISA reactions were then developed with TMB (an HRP chromogenic substrate), and the absorbance read at 450 nm. The results shown in  FIG. 17  illustrate that antibodies in the serum generated a signal that was twice as strong or stronger with eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 than with either 264p-HLA-A2 or Her2/neu-peptide-HLA-A2, suggesting that some specific antibodies against the eIF4 Gp epitope are present. 
     To confirm the ELISA findings, cell based assays were performed. T2 cell direct binding assays, as described in Example 1 and in  FIG. 7 , were performed, and the results shown in  FIGS. 18 and 19 . In these assays, T2 cells were loaded with a relevant (eIF4 Gp) or irrelevant (264p) peptide, and the reactivity of immune sera from immunized mice against them were measured.  FIG. 18  demonstrates the detection of HLA-A2 levels on peptide-pulsed T2 cells using BB7.2 mAb. This figure demonstrates the successful and relatively equivalent loading of both the 264 and eIF4G peptides on the surface of HLA-A2 T2 cells. 
       FIG. 19  demonstrates the results of staining eIF4G and 264 peptide-loaded T2 cells with a bleed from a mouse immunized with eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2. 264 peptide loaded cells are shown in the solid peak. The pre-absorbed serum sample was used at a dilution of 1:400 for staining and preferentially binds cells pulsed with the eIF4G peptide (as shown by the rightward shift). The pre-bleed sample shows no sign of reactivity to T2 cells pulsed with either peptide (not shown). 
     Next, T2 cell-based competitive assays, as described in Example 1 and in  FIG. 7 , were used to further evaluate the specificity of the polyclonal antibody to eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2, and the results are shown in  FIGS. 20 and 21 . In these assays, sera from mice immunized with eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramers were diluted 1:200 in PBS and pre-absorbed against Her2/neu-peptide-HLA-A2. The sera was then mixed with eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 or with 264p-HLA-A2, either in the form of monomers ( FIG. 20 ) or tetramers ( FIG. 21 ) and before being reacted with T2 cells loaded with eIF4G peptide (100 μg/ml). 
     In the Figures, the maximum staining signal (filled peak) is shown for the anti-serum. To assess the specificity of antibody binding, a competitor (eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2) or a non-competitor (264p-HLA-A2) was included in the cell staining reaction mix at three different concentrations (0.1, 1.0 and 10 μg). The results shown in  FIGS. 20 and 21  reveal that the addition of the 264p-HLA-A2 monomer or tetramer had little inhibitory activity on anti-serum binding to eIF4G peptide-loaded T2 cells. In contrast, a dose-response effect of specific binding to T2 cells was observed in the presence of the competitor eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 monomer or tetramer. These findings provide additional evidence that the immunization strategy of the presently disclosed and claimed invention can elicit a specific anti-peptide-HLA-A2 IgG antibody response. 
     Mouse hybridomas were generated as described in Example 1 using standard technology, and immunogen specific monoclonals were identified using a competitive binding ELISA (as described herein before). From over 800 clones, 27 mAb candidates were identified, and 4F7 mAb (IgG1 isotype) was selected for further characterization. After expanding the 4F7 hybridoma cell line by known methods in the art, the mAb was purified from 300 ml of culture supernatant on a Protein-A column that yielded 30 mg of 4F7 mAb. The specificity of antibody binding to relevant peptide-HLA-A2 tetramers and 3 irrelevant peptide-HLA-A2 tetramers was determined by ELISA, as shown in  FIG. 22 . The 4F7 mAb showed specific binding only to eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramers; no signal was detected using irrelevant peptide-A2 controls, which included peptide VLQ and TMT, both derived from the human beta chorionic gonadotropin protein, and 264 peptide derived from the human p53 tumor suppressor protein. 
     Next, the binding affinity and specificity of the 4F7 mAb was determined by plasmon surface resonance (BIACore). 4F7 mAb was coupled to a biosensor chip via amine chemistry, and soluble monomers of HLA-A2 loaded with 264 or eIF4G peptide were passed over the antibody coated chip. In  FIG. 23 , specific binding of soluble eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 monomer to 4F7 mAb was observed, while no binding to 264p-HLA-A2 complexes containing the irrelevant peptide p53-264 was observed. The affinity constant of 4F7 mAb for its specific ligand was determined at 2×10 −9 M. 
     In  FIGS. 22 and 23 , 4F7 binding to recombinant eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 molecules was demonstrated. In  FIG. 24 , 4F7 binding to eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complexes on the surface of T2 cells was demonstrated. In this experiment cells were pulsed at 10 μg/ml with the following peptides: eIF4G, 264, and TMT. Unpulsed T2 cells were also used as a control. In  FIG. 24A , T2 cells pulsed with irrelevant peptides or no peptide and stained with 4F7 (50 ng) displayed minimal signal. In contrast, 4F7 staining of eIF4G peptide loaded T2 cells resulted in a significant rightward shift, indicating specific binding of 4F7. In Panel B, T2 cells were stained with BB7.2 mAb (specific for HLA-A2). T2 cells loaded with any of the peptides resulted in a rightward shift of the peak, indicating that each of the peptides efficiently loads the HLA on the cell surface. These data also indicate that the 4F7 binding to T2 cells is dependent on the antibody recognizing both peptide and HLA-A2. 
     Characterization of 4F7 TCRm binding specificity using human epithelial cell lines. It was observed that the 4F7 TCRm mAb recognizes recombinant HLA-A2 protein or T2 cells pulsed with eIF4G( 720 ) peptide. Next, it was evaluated whether this antibody would recognize the eIF4G( 720 ) peptide-A2 complex on a tumor cell line expressing HLA-A2. Several groups have reported on the overexpression of eIF4G protein in malignant cells (Bauer et al., 2001 and 2002; and Fukuchi-Shimogori et al., 1997). However, there are no reports describing the presentation of the eIF4G( 720 ) peptide by MHC class I molecules on cancer cells. To address whether the self peptide was presented on cancer cells, the 4F7 TCRm mAb was used to stain a normal human mammary epithelial cell line and a human breast carcinoma cell line (MDA-MB-231). Although both cell lines expressed similar levels of HLA-A2 on their surface, the 4F7 TCRm mAb stained only the breast carcinoma cell line ( FIG. 25 ), indicating that cancer cells express this peptide-HLA-A2 epitope. In addition, these results support the binding specificity of 4F7 TCRm mAb for the eIF4G( 720 ) peptide-HLA-A2 complex. 
     In  FIG. 26A , MCF-7 cells were stained with 100 ng of 4F7 mAb and showed a significant rightward shift compared to the isotype control. To determine if binding was indeed specific for the eIF4G peptide, soluble tetramers (competitor and non-competitor) were used to block 4F7 binding. As expected, eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramer completely blocked 4F7 staining, while the non-competitor, 264p-HLA-A2, failed to block 4F7 mAb from binding to cells. In  FIG. 26B , the HLA-A2 negative breast carcinoma cell line BT-20 was not stained with 4F7 mAb. These findings support the specific binding of 4F7 antibody to eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 complex. 
     In  FIG. 27 , three panels are shown in which MDA-231 cells were stained with 4F7 mAb (50 ng) in the absence or presence of soluble peptide-HLA-A2 monomers. The three peptide-HLA-A2 monomers selected were eIF4 Gp (competitor) and 264p and Her2/neu peptide (non-competitors). As shown in  FIG. 27A , 4F7 binds to MDA-231 cells, and its binding is significantly inhibited using competitor. In contrast, no reduction in binding signal strength was seen with either non-competitor, indicating that 4F7 binds to tumor cells in a specific manner. 
     These data confirm the isolation of a novel TCRm monoclonal antibody with specificity for a peptide derived from the eIF4G protein that is presented by HLA-A2 on the surface of breast cancer cells. 
     Direct detection of endogenously presented eIF4G(720)-HLA-A*0201 complexes on HIV-1 infected CD4 +  T cells. Elevated eIF4G( 720 ) peptide bound to soluble HLA-A*0201 molecules as well as eIF4G peptide presented by HLA-B*0702, was revealed using HIV-1 infected Sup-T1 cells. Development of the 4F7 TCRm mAb facilitated a more physiologically relevant analysis of the eIF4G( 720 )-HLA-A*0201 epitope through characterization of these complexes on HIV-1 infected and non-infected CD4+ T cells. The staining profiles for 4F7 TCRm, 1B8 TCRm, and IgG 1  isotype control using mock infected HLA-A*0201 positive PBMCs are shown in  FIG. 28A . The 4F7 TCRm mAb showed modest staining of mock infected PBMCs, thus validating our Sup-T1 cell findings in which eIF4G( 720 ) peptide is constitutively expressed at low levels. In contrast, no cell staining was observed with the two control mAbs. Moreover, no cell staining with 4F7 TCRm mAb was detected in HIV-1 infected, HLA-A*0201 negative CD4 +  T cells (data not shown), indicating that eIF4G( 720 ) must be presented in the context of HLA-A*0201. 
     Next, eIF4G( 720 ) expression was examined in HLA-A*0201 positive CD4+ T cells infected with the HIV-1 strain IIIb and stained with the 4F7 TCRm five days post-infection (PI). HIV-1 infected CD4+ T cells were identified by HIV-1 p24 expression ( FIGS. 28D-F  and 28G-1) by staining with the anti-p24-PE conjugate. On day 5 PI, 30.1% of the cells were p24 positive. At this time the population of cells was stained with the 4F7 TCRm, 1B8 TCRm or IgG1 isotype control mAbs. As shown in  FIGS. 28A-C  and 28G-I, in both mock infected cells and in p24 negative cells, little if any difference was observed between 4F7 TCRm and control antibody staining. In contrast, 4F7 TCRm staining of the infected cell population ( FIG. 28F ; p24 positive cells) revealed a marked rightward shift in mean fluorescence intensity (MFI=30.1) compared to the p24 negative cell population ( FIG. 281 ; MFI=8.2). Interestingly, the identical 4F7 TCRm staining profile was observed using HIV-1 strains Ba-L and NL4.3 (data not shown). This same 4F7 TCRm staining pattern was not observed on HIV-1 infected HLA-A*0201 negative CD4+ T cells, supporting MHC-restriction for the TCRm (data not shown). To determine whether the increase in eIF4G( 720 )-A2 complexes was specific for HIV-1 infected cells, the effect of influenza virus infection on eIF4G( 720 )-A2 expression was examined. After staining cells with the 4F7 TCRm mAb, no increase was detected suggesting that the elevated levels observed for eIF4G( 720 )peptide expression may be specific for HIV-1 infected cells (data not shown). These findings validate the presence of elevated eIF4G( 720 ) peptide in HIV-1 infected cells, and demonstrate that a TCRm to eIF4G( 720 )-HLA-A*0201 can discriminate HIV-1 infected cells from non-infected cells. 
     Next, the 4F7 TCRm mAb was used to directly examine the kinetics of eIF4G( 720 ) peptide-HLA-A*0201 complex presentation on HIV-1 infected CD4+ T cells for 9 days post-infection (PI). As shown in  FIG. 29A , the p24 positive CD4+ T cells had a two-fold increase in 4F7 TCRm staining signal compared to the p24 negative cells by the third day PI. By days 7 and 8 PI, the 4F7 TCRm staining differential had increased by almost 4-fold between the p24 negative and positive groups ( FIG. 29A ). In contrast, there were no significant changes in cell staining using the isotype control Ab ( FIG. 29B ). This finding directly validates the expression of the eIF4G( 720 )-HLA-A*0201 epitope and reveals the dynamic nature of host-peptide epitope presentation on HIV infected cells. 
     To firmly establish that the 4F7 TCRm specifically recognized the eIF4G( 720 ) peptide in the context of HLA-A*0201, CD4+ T cells were infected with HIV-1 strain Ba-L and evaluated 4F7 TCRm staining on days 3 through 5 PI in a tetramer competition assay. HLA-A*0201 tetramer complexes loaded with eIF4G( 720 ) peptide or irrelevant p53( 264 ) and VLQ( 44 ) peptides were included in the staining reactions. The infected CD4+ T cells were stained with 0.5 μg of 4F7 TCRm in the presence of either (1) eIF4G( 720 )-HLA-A*0201 tetramer complex that would compete with specific binding to eIF4G( 720 )-HLA-A*0201; (2) p53( 264 )-HLA-A*0201 tetramer complexes; or (3) VLQ( 44 )-HLA-A*0201 tetramer complexes, wherein (2) and (3) would not compete with specific binding to eIF4G( 720 )-HLA-A*0201. The results shown in  FIG. 30  reveal that 4F7 TCRm mAb binding to the p24 positive cell population was significantly reduced in the presence of 0.5 μg of eIF4G( 720 )-HLA-A*0201-tetramer at days 4 and 5 ( FIGS. 30A  &amp; B). In contrast, when tetramers p53( 264 )-HLA-A*0201 and VLQ( 44 )-HLA-A*0201 were added (0.5 μg), there was little to no inhibition of 4F7 TCRm mAb staining. The 1B8 TCRm mAb did not stain the infected or non-infected CD4+ T cells (data not shown), further supporting the claim that the 4F7 TCRm specifically recognizes the eIF4G( 720 )-HLA-A*0201 complex. To conclude, these findings indicate that HIV-1 infection of primary cells leads to the enhancement of host peptide eIF4G( 720 ) through which immune receptors (TCRm here) can distinguish the virally infected from non-infected cells. 
     Example 3 
     Her-2(9 369 ) represents a common epitope expressed by various tumor types including breast carcinomas (Brossart et al., 1999). Approximately 20-30% of primary breast cancers express Her-2. The Her-2/neu receptor protein is a member of the tyrosine kinase family of growth factor receptors (Coussens et al., 1985) that is frequently amplified and overexpressed in breast cancer (Slamon et al., 2001). The Her-2/neu protein is generally displayed on the surface of cells and, during malignancy, is detected at high levels on tumor cells. Although its precise anti-tumor mechanism(s) remain unknown, Herceptin, an anti-Her-2/neu antibody, is used in breast cancer treatment to target the receptor on the surface of tumor cells. In addition to using antibodies to attack tumors expressing Her-2/neu receptor on their surface, Her-2/neu oncoprotein contains several HLA-A2-restricted epitopes that are recognized by CTL on autologous tumors. The most extensively studied Her-2 epitope (and the one utilized herein in Example 3) spans amino acids 369-377 (Her-2(9 369 )) (KIFGSLAFL; SEQ ID NO:3) (Fisk et al., 1995) and is recognized by tumor associated lymphocytes as well as reactive T cell clones as an immunodominant HLA-A2-restricted epitope. The peptide has been shown to bind with high affinity to HLA-A2 alleles (Fisk et al., 1995; and Seliger et al., 2000). The Her-2(9 369 ) epitope binds to HLA-A2 with intermediate affinity (IC 50 ˜50 nM) (Rongcun et al., 1999), and because it is grossly overexpressed on malignant cells, it has been used as a vaccine candidate in several clinical trials. For instance, Knutson et al. (2002) demonstrated that patients immunized with Her-2(9 369 ) could develop interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) responses to the peptide and exhibited increased Her-2(9 369 )-specific precursor frequencies. 
     Her2/neu-peptide-HLA-A2 monomers and tetramers were generated as described above in Example 1. However, Her2/neu-peptide-HLA-A2 tetramers were generated at a lower efficiency than for either 264p-HLA-A2 tetramers (Example 1) or eIF4 Gp-HLA-A2 tetramers (Example 2), as shown in Table I. The relatively low tetramer yields with Her2/neu peptide do not correlate well with the high affinity of this peptide to HLA-A2. The IC 50  of Her2/neu peptide is lower than p53-264, yet tetramer yield with Her2/neu peptide is two to three fold less than tetramer yield with p53-264. 
     To solve this yield problem, it was determined that the peptide needed to be solubilized in a solvent, such as but not limited to, DMSO or DMF, prior to refolding with the heavy and light chains. Once the Her2/neu peptide was solubilized in DMSO, sufficient amounts of Her2/neu peptide monomer and tetramer were produced. 
     The Her2/neu-peptide-HLA-A2 tetramers were utilized for immunization of Balb/c mice and generation of monoclonal antibodies as described in detail in Examples 1 and 2. Briefly, the 1B8 TCRm mAb was generated by immunizing mice with soluble recombinant HLA-A*0201 loaded with the Her2/neu 369  peptide epitope. The soluble heavy chains of HLA-A*0201 (hereafter designated A2+) and the β2-microglobulin (β2m) were produced in the form of inclusion bodies in  E. coli , purified and then refolded in the presence of the Her2 KIFGSLAFL peptide. The conformation of the refolded protein was assessed using anti-HLA Class I antibody (W6/32) and the anti-HLA-A2 specific mAb BB7.2 (data not shown). The refolded protein served as the immunogen and as the positive control in screening assays of hybridoma supernatants. The eIF4G 720 , TMT 40  and VLQ 44  peptide loaded A2+ molecules served as negative controls. Over 2000 hybridomas were screened and the 1B8 TCRm hybridoma was selected because it specifically recognized the recombinant HLA-A2 protein loaded with the p369 peptide but did not bind recombinant HLA-A2 proteins loaded with irrelevant peptides ( FIG. 31A ). As a control for specificity, the 3F9 TCRm mAb was used, which is specific for the TMT 40  peptide-HLA-A2 complex. As shown in  FIG. 31B , the 3F9 TCRm mAb binds specifically to the TMT( 40 )-A2 complex without binding to the Her2( 369 )-A2 complex. To demonstrate that recombinant HLA-A2 proteins were properly folded after being loaded with the peptide, they were stained with the BB7.2 anti-A2.1 mAb ( FIG. 31C ). These data demonstrate that the TCRm antibodies recognize a specific MHC-peptide complex and they do not have detectable cross-reactivity with either A2+ molecules or HLA complexes loaded with irrelevant peptides. 
     Although 1B8 TCRm recognizes the recombinant Her2( 369 )-A2 complex target in coated wells, it was unclear whether this mAb would recognize the specific peptide when loaded into HLA-A*0201 complexes expressed on a cell surface. In order to ensure that 1B8 recognized the Her2 369  peptide in the context of the native HLA-A2, its binding to T2 cells pulsed with 10 μM of p369 peptide, irrelevant peptides (TMT and eIF4G) or no peptide was analyzed. As shown in FIG.  32 A, 1B8 TCRm only stains T2 cells pulsed with the Her2/neu peptide but does not bind T2 cells not pulsed or pulsed with irrelevant peptides. These results confirm the fine and unique specificity of the 1B8 TCRm for the Her2/neu 369  peptide present in the binding pocket of the HLA-A2 complex. 
     The specificity and sensitivity of the 1B8 TCRm mAb for the Her2( 369 )-A2 complex was further evaluated using three different methods. In the first series of experiments, T2 cells were pulsed with a cocktail consisting of 20 different irrelevant peptides in the presence or absence of the p369 peptide. The results indicate that 1B8 TCRm mAb was able to bind to cells only when the specific Her2/neu peptide was included in the peptide cocktail ( FIG. 32B ). In these experiments, Her2/neu peptide represented less than 5% of the total peptide sample in the pulsing cocktail. In the second series of experiments, HLA-A2+/neu-human PBMCs were stained with the 1B8 TCRm mAb. As shown in  FIG. 32C , the 1B8 TCRm failed to stain HLA-A2 positive cells that lacked Her2/neu expression (TA-1 mAb). These findings further support the fine binding specificity of 1B8 for the Her2 (369) -A2 complex. In the third series of experiments, T2 cells were pulsed with decreasing concentrations of the p369 peptide (2500-0.08 nM). As shown in  FIG. 32D , the 1B8 TCRm mAb was able to recognize T2 cells pulsed with the peptide at concentrations at least as low as 0.08 nM. Taken together, these results indicate that 1B8 TCRm mAb is capable of detecting low concentrations of MHC-peptide complexes. 
     It was observed that the 1B8 TCRm mAb recognizes recombinant HLA-A2 protein or T2 cells pulsed with the p369 peptide. Next, it was evaluated whether this antibody would recognize the Her2( 369 )-A2 complex presented by tumor cells using five HLA-A2+/neu+ cell lines, MDA-MB-231, Saos-2, MCF-7, SW620 and COLO205. It has previously been demonstrated herein that the p369 epitope is processed and presented in MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast carcinoma cells. HLA-A2−/neu+ cell lines, BT-20 and SKOV3 were used as negative controls. In the first series of experiments, cells were stained with 0.5 μg of IgG1 isotype control mAb, 3F9 or 1B8 TCRm mAbs, and all tumor cells except the BT-20 and SKOV3 cells ( FIG. 33A ) were stained with the 1B8 TCRm mAb (thick gray line). In contrast, only human chorionic gonadotropin expressing cells, COLO205, were weakly positive when stained with 3F9 TCRm mAb (solid black line). In the second series of experiments, the cell lines were pre-treated overnight with interferon-γ and TNF-α and then stained with the same panel of antibodies used in  FIG. 33A . As shown in  FIG. 33B , the same five cell lines were stained with 1B8 TCR mAb. In addition, with the exception of Saos-2, four cell lines showed enhanced staining with 1B8, suggesting an increase in levels of Her2( 369 )-A2 complex. No staining was detected on SKOV3 cells, and low background signal was detected on BT-20 cells ( FIG. 33B ). These results indicate that TCRm mAb can be used in the validation of epitopes which are endogenously processed and presented on the surface of tumor cells. 
     To further demonstrate that the 1B8 TCRm mAb binds specifically to endogenously processed Her2( 369 )-A2 complex on human tumor cells, the antibody was evaluated in two different competition assays. In the first system, HLA-A2 tetramer complexes were loaded with either (1) Her-2/neu peptide that would compete with specific binding to Her2( 369 )-A2; or (2) irrelevant TMT peptide that would not compete for binding sites, and then added to the staining reactions. MDA-MB-231 tumor cells were stained with 0.5 μg of 1B8 in the presence of Her2( 369 )-A2 tetramer or TMT( 40 )-A2 tetramer complex. The results, shown in  FIG. 34A , reveal that 1B8 TCRm mAb binding was reduced by more than 50% in the presence of 0.1 μg of the Her2( 369 )-A2-tetramer and was completely blocked by 1.0 μg of the Her2( 369 )-A2-tetramer. In contrast, when TMT( 40 )-A2 tetramer was added (1.0 μg), there was no inhibition of 1B8 TCRm mAb staining. 
     In the second system, the target specificity of the CTL line generated in the HLA-A2-Kb transgenic mice for the Her2( 369 )-A2 epitope was first confirmed by showing lysis of p369 pulsed T2 cells but not with unpulsed cells ( FIG. 34B ). CTL activity against untreated MDA-MB-231 cells or cells pretreated with interferon-γ (IFN-γ, 20 ng/ml) plus tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α, 3 ng/ml) was then blocked by adding 1B8 TCRm (anti-Her2( 369 )-A2) or BB7.2 (anti-HLA 2.1) mAb ( FIG. 34C ). In contrast, isotype control antibodies (IgG1 and IgG2b), did not inhibit the CTL activity ( FIG. 34C ). Collectively, these data illustrate that the 1B8 TCRm mAb can specifically recognize the Her2( 369 )-A2 immunodominant epitope on the surface of tumor cells. 
       FIG. 35  illustrates that 1B8 mAb does not bind to soluble Her2/neu peptide. MDA-MB-231 cells were stained with 1B8 in the presence or absence of exogenously added Her-2/neu peptide.  FIG. 35  demonstrates that 1B8 TCR mimic has dual specificity and does not bind to Her-2/neu peptide alone. 
     Expression of peptide-HLA class I on the cell surface depends on multiple parameters including the quantity and quality of the peptide supplied. The supply of peptide is also dependent on the availability of protein and the rate at which the protein is processed. It is not clear, however, whether tumor antigen expression and MHC expression are directly linked with the level of expression of MHC-peptide complexes. The expression of Her-2/neu molecules, HLA-A2.1 molecules and Her2(369)-A2 complexes on the surface of different tumor cell lines was assessed. Tumor cell lines were stained for Her-2/neu and the expression of this antigen was variable among the cell lines ( FIG. 36 ). For example, the COLO205 cell line revealed noticeably higher levels of Her2/neu protein than MDA-MB-231, Saos-2, MCF-7 and SW620 tumor cell lines. The BT-20 (HLA-A2 negative) cell line had an intermediate level of Her2/neu protein expression. Detection of Her2/neu protein expression by two different methods revealed that the level of cell surface expression directly correlates (p&lt;0.05) with the cellular level of Her2 protein expression (R 2 =0.82) as evaluated by ELISA ( FIGS. 36A  &amp; B). 
     Next, different tumor cell lines were evaluated for cell surface expression of HLA-A2 molecules. As expected, the cell lines displayed different levels of HLA-A2 molecules ( FIG. 37A ), showing only modest changes in levels at different stages of the growth cycle, thus suggesting that HLA-A2 and TAA expression is stable (data not shown). To evaluate whether there was a correlation between HLA-A2 and Her-2/neu expression with the levels of Her2( 369 )-A2 complexes present on the cell surface, tumor cell lines were stained with the 1B8 TCRm mAb. It was observed that Her2( 369 )-A2 expression levels (MFIR) of COLO205 were similar to those of Saos-2, SW620 and MCF-7 cell lines and roughly 3-fold lower than MDA-MB-231 cells, even though COLO205 demonstrated significantly higher expression of the Her2/neu antigen ( FIG. 36 ). Taken together, these results indicate the absence of a direct correlation (p&gt;0.05) between the level of Her-2/neu or HLA-A2.1 molecules and the number of Her2( 369 )-A2 complexes on the surface of these tumor cell lines. 
     To determine whether there is a relationship between CTL recognition and the level of expression of MHC-peptide complexes, we took advantage of the Her-2/neu/A2-p369 specific CTL line. The p369-CTLs were evaluated for cytotoxic activity against untreated human tumor cell lines ( FIG. 37C ). The level of Her2( 369 )-A2 complex was found to be a better indicator of cell lysis by the CTL line than was cell surface expression of either Her2/neu antigen or HLA-A2 molecule expression. In fact, poor or no lysis of the cell lines expressing low levels of Her2( 369 )-A2 complex was observed, as identified using the 1B8 TCRm mAb (e.g., SW620 and COLO205) ( FIG. 37C ). Also noted was the minimal lysis of BT-20 cells observed. The fact that these cells are HLA-A2 −  is something at this time that can not be explained. 
     To further examine the relationship between levels of MHC-peptide complexes present on the cell surface and the levels of antigen and MHC molecules expressed, the cell lines were pretreated with interferon-γ (IFN-γ, 20 ng/ml) plus tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α, 3 ng/ml). Treating tumor cells in this way is known to increase the expression of adhesion molecules (e.g., ICAM) and MHC class I heavy chain. These cytokines also enhance protein processing and peptide presentation by HLA class I through the activation of the immunoproteasome, which has been hypothesized to cause an increase in the expression of specific MHC-peptide complexes, especially in cells with greater availability of antigen. This hypothesis was tested by treating the tumor cell lines for 24 hrs with cytokines and then staining with the BB7.2 mAb ( FIG. 38A ) and the 1B8 TCR mimic ( FIG. 38B ). It was observed that, after cytokine treatment, all tumor cell lines, except Saos-2, displayed greater 1B8 TCRm staining intensity (see also  FIG. 33B ), indicating that more of the specific complex was expressed on the cell surface. When comparing cell surface levels of the Her2( 369 )-A2 complexes between the different treated cell lines, it was found that the 1B8 staining intensity for COLO205 (MFIR=9.5) was markedly lower than that of MDA-MB-231 (MFIR=38) and MCF-7 (MFIR=27). This observation suggests that stimulation of cellular machinery for antigen processing and presentation did not favor higher levels of specific HLA-peptide complex in cells that, as demonstrated previously ( FIG. 36A ), expressed significantly more of the tumor antigen. Validation of cytokine-induced effects on the MHC class I system was demonstrated by the increase observed in HLA-A2 expression ( FIG. 38A ). Interestingly, in this group of cell lines, surface levels of HLA-A2 were equivalent in all but MCF-7 cells, which had noticeably lower HLA-A2 expression. It was thus concluded from these data that TAA expression does not correlate with levels of specific MHC-peptide complexes. 
     Following treatment with cytokines, which increases the levels of Her2( 369 )-A2 complexes, it was found that lysis was augmented in all HLA-A2 positive cell lines ( FIG. 38C ). The enhancement of cytotoxic activity for the cytokine treated tumor cells significantly (p=0.05) correlated with an increase in specific HLA-peptide levels on the surface of the cells (R 2 =0.75) suggesting that the susceptibility of tumor cells to lysis is largely linked to the density of specific Her2( 369 )-A2 complexes present ( FIG. 38D ). Taken together, these data indicate that protein antigen expression, which can be high or low on different tumor cells, does not predict the level of CTL epitope presentation nor tumor susceptibility to CTL killing. 
     Thus, a new angle of attack on a proven anti-cancer target has been reported herein. The reported levels of Her2/neu peptide on the surface of MDA cells, which are reported as being low or non-existent, contrasts sharply to the staining reaction seen with the antibody of the present invention, which recognizes peptides from the protein. This may indicate that a much higher percentage of cancer cells express the receptor, but that the receptor does not traffic effectively to the surface of the cell; however, it is still a good target based on the expression level of the Her2/neu peptide associated with HLA-A2. 
     Example 4 
     Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is a member of the glycoprotein hormone family that shares homology with luteinizing hormone, follicle stimulating hormone and thyroid stimulating hormone. Each of these is a heterodimer with a variable β chain and a common a chain. hCG is most commonly associated with pregnancy assessment but is also a marker for tumors resulting from tissues associated with placenta or germ cells. In a comprehensive review of hCG in cancer, Stenman et al. (2004) reported that β chain (hCGβ) is found in the serum of 45-60% of patients with biliary and pancreatic cancers, and 10-30% of other cancers. Immunohistochemical analysis and urinalysis have been used to demonstrate the presence of hCGβ in lung, gynecological and head and neck cancers. The aggressiveness and resistance to therapy of bladder cell carcinoma expressing hCGβ has been associated with an autocrine anti-apoptotic effect elicited by the free β chain (Butler et al., 2000). A series of antibodies which bind hCG were developed for use as diagnostic reagents, and hCGβ-specific antibodies which have application in pregnancy testing as well as monitoring for hCG positive tumors continue to be developed (Charrel-Dennis et al., 2004). An anti-hCGβ vaccine (for use in treatment of human cancer) that targets hCGβ to dendritic cells has been shown to elicit both cytotoxic and helper T cell responses to peptide pulsed target cells and tumor cell lines (He et al., 2004). Recently, several MHC class I epitopes from hCGβ have been identified which bind with high affinity to HLA-A*0201 molecules (Dangles et al., 2002). 
     A first step in evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic antibodies is in vitro assessment of their specificity and ability to induce tumor cell lysis via the activation of complement and ADCC. The therapeutic successes of the monoclonal antibodies trastuzumab and rituxamab are thought to be due, at least in part, to their ability to promote ADCC and CDC (Clynes et al., 2000; Spiridon et al., 2004; Harjunpaa et al., 2000; and Golay et al., 2000). In the present invention, the antigen binding specificity, in vitro lytic abilities and in vivo tumor growth inhibition of a TCRm mAb, 3.2G1, which is specific for the GVL peptide (residues 47-55 from hCGβ) presented in the context of HLA-A2, are demonstrated. 
     Generation of monoclonal antibodies and experimental methods were performed as described in detail in Examples 1 and 2, except as described herein below. 
     Cell Culture: Cell culture medium included IMDM and RPMI from Cambrex (Walkerville, Md.), L-15 from Mediatech (Herndon, Va.), and Hybridoma SFM and AIM-V from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, Calif.). Media supplements included heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum (FBS) and penicillin/streptomycin from Sigma (St. Louis, Mo.) and L-glutamine from HyClone (Logan, Utah). Recombinant human IL-2 was obtained from Peprotech (Rockyhill, N.J.). All tumor lines were maintained in culture medium containing glutamine, pen/strep and 10% FBS. Cell cultures were maintained at 37° C. in 5% CO 2  atmosphere with the exception of MDA and SW620 which were cultured without CO 2 . MDA and SW620 cells were cultured in L-15, SKOV3.A2 and T2 in IMDM, and BT20 in RPMI. When necessary, attached cells were released from flasks using TrypLE Express (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, Calif.). 
     Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from anonymous donors were obtained from separation cones of discarded apheresis units from the Coffee Memorial Blood Bank, Amarillo, Tex., after platelet harvest. Cells were separated on a ficoll gradient, then washed, counted and resuspended in AIM-V medium containing 200 units of IL-2 per ml at a concentration of 2−2.5×10 6  cells/ml. PBMC were maintained at this concentration with media changes and addition of IL-2 every 2 to 3 days for a maximum of seven days. These conditions have been shown to maintain and activate resident NK cells within the PBMC population (Liu et al., 2002). 
     Murine hybridoma cells were initially grown in RPMI supplemented with 10% FBS, glutamine and pen/strep (RPMI/10) as described below. After selection for binding specificity, clones were grown in RPMI/10 to provide supernatant containing the antibodies of interest or in SFM to provide supernatant for isolation of purified antibodies from protein G columns (GE Healthcare BioSciences, Piscataway, N.J.). 
     Peptides and HLA-A2 complexes: The following peptides were synthesized at the Molecular Biology Resource Facility, University of Oklahoma (Oklahoma City, Okla.): KIFGSLAFL (residues 369-377, designated Her-2; SEQ ID NO:3), eukaryotic initiation translation factor 4 gamma VLMTEDIKL (residues 720-728, designated eIF4G; SEQ ID NO:2), human chorionic gonadotropin-β TMTRVLQGV (residues 40-48, designated TMT; SEQ ID NO:4), VLQGVLPAL (residues 44-53, designated VLQ; SEQ ID NO:5), and GVLPALPQV (residues 47-55, designated GVL; SEQ ID NO:6). HLA-A2 extracellular domain and β2 microglobulin were produced as inclusion bodies in  E. coli  and refolded essentially as described previously. After refolding, the peptide-HLA-A2 mixture was concentrated, and properly folded complex was isolated from contaminants on a Superdex 75 sizing column (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences AB). This complex, designated the monomer, was biotinylated using the BirA biotin ligase enzyme (Avidity, Denver, Colo.) and purified on the S75 column. Purified, biotinylated monomer was mixed with streptavidin at an empirically determined ratio to yield higher order complexes. Complexes were then separated on a Superdex 200 column, and the peak corresponding to a streptavidin plus four monomers (the tetramer) was isolated. Tetramer concentration was determined by BCA protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, Ill.). 
     ELISA assays were performed using Maxisorb 96-well plates (Nunc, Rochester, N.Y.). Assays to evaluate binding specificity of the TCRm antibodies were done on plates coated with either 500 ng/well HLA monomer or 100 ng/well HLA tetramer. Bound antibodies were detected with peroxidase-labeled goat anti-mouse IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch) followed by ABTS (Pierce). Reactions were quenched with 1% SDS. Absorbance was measured at 405 nm on a Victor II plate reader (PerkinElmer, Wellesley, Mass.). The SBA Clonotyping System/HRP and mouse immunoglobulin panel from Southern Biotech were used to estimate the concentration of 3.2G1 (isotype IgG 2a ) in the supernatant of FBS-containing medium. The assay was run according to manufacturer&#39;s directions, and 3.2G1 signal was compared with that of an IgG 2a  standard supplied by the manufacturer. Development, quenching and analysis of the plate were performed as described above for the other TCRms. 
     Cell staining: T2 is a mutant cell line that lacks transporter-associated proteins (TAP) 1 and 2 which allows for efficient loading of exogenous peptides (Wei et al., 1992). The T2 cells were pulsed with the peptides at 20 μg/ml for 4 hours in growth medium, with the exception of the peptide-titration experiments, in which the peptide concentration was varied as indicated. Cells were washed and resuspended in staining buffer (SB; PBS+0.5% BSA+2 mM EDTA) and then stained with 1 μg of 3.2G1, BB7.2 or isotype control antibody for 15 to 30 minutes in 100 μl SB. Cells were then washed with 3 ml SB, and the pellet was resuspended in 100 μl of SB containing 2 μl of either of two goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (FITC or PE labeled). After incubating for 15-30 minutes at room temperature, the wash was repeated, and cells were resuspended in 0.5 ml SB, analyzed on a FACScan instrument and evaluated using Cell Quest Software (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, N.J.). 
     In  FIG. 41 , tumor cell lines were stained and evaluated in the same manner as the T2 cells, after being released from plates and washed in SB. Tetramer competition stains were carried out in the same order described above except that tetramer at the appropriate concentration was mixed with the antibody and allowed to stand for 40 minutes before the mix was added to the cells. 
     Cytotoxicity Analysis: Specific cell lysis in the complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC), natural killer cell (NK) and antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC) assays was evaluated using the CytoTox 96 non-radioactive cytotoxicity Lactate Dehydrogenase Assay (LDH assay) from Promega (Madison, Wis.), following the instructions provided by the manufacturer. This assay measures the release of cellular LDH into the culture supernatant after cell lysis. All cells were grown or pulsed with peptide in their appropriate growth medium, but final incubations of cells in the presence of complement (CDC) or human PBMCs (NK and ADCC) was carried out in AIM-V medium for 4 hours at 37° C. CDC analysis of T2 cells took place under three different conditions: (1) the antibody concentration was varied and competing or non-competing tetramer added, (2) peptide mixes were used to pulse cells, or (3) GVL peptide was titrated for use in cell pulsing. CDC analysis of MDA-MB-231 cells using antibody dilutions and tetramer competition was carried out on adherent cells. Exact conditions are described in the figure legends and/or results section. LoTox complement was obtained from Cedarlane (Burlington, N.C.) All cells used as targets for cytotoxicity assays were pulsed for 4 hrs with peptide. Specific lysis in the CDC assays was calculated as follows: ([experimental release-spontaneous release]/[maximum release-spontaneous release])×100=specific release. ADCC reactions using human PBMC effector cells (E) were carried out on MDA-MB-231 target cells (T) using 3.2G1 or W6/32 antibodies at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml. Effector:target ratios (E:T) were varied as indicated in the figures. NK analysis was performed by mixing human effector cells with K562 cells and incubating as above. Specific lysis in ADCC analysis was calculated as follows: ([E+T+Ab release−E+T-Ab release]/[maximum release−spontaneous release])×100=specific release. Specific lysis in NK analysis was calculated: ([E+T release−spontaneous release]/[maximum release-spontaneous release])×100=specific release. Spontaneous and maximum release was measured before and after, respectively, lysis of target cells with 0.9% Triton X 100. 
     In vivo studies: Six week-old female athymic nude mice (CByJ.Cg-Foxn1{nu}/j) were obtained from Jackson Laboratories and housed under sterile conditions in barrier cages. Each of nineteen mice was implanted with 5×10 6  freshly harvested (97% viable) MDA-MB-231 cells in 0.2 ml containing 1:1 mixture of medium and Matrigel (Sigma, St. Louis, Mo.) (Ferguson et al., 2005; and Hermann et al., 2005). Mice received an i.p. injection of either 100 μg of an isotype IgG 2a  control antibody (n=10) or 100 μg of 3.2G1 (n=9) at the same time that the tumor cells were implanted s.c. between the shoulders. Either 3.2G1 or isotype control antibody (50 μg) was administered (i.p.) weekly for the following 3 weeks. Animals were held for at least one week after the appearance of the last tumor in the isotype control group (a total of 70 days) before totaling frequency of occurrence. All tumors reached at least 6 mm in diameter before being scored as positive. Tumor volumes were measured once a week using a slide caliper. Tumor volumes were calculated by assuming a spherical shape and using the formula: volume=4r 3 /3, where r=½ of the mean tumor diameter measured in two dimensions. 
     Statistics: Significance values for GVL peptide concentration and the amount of CDC lysis were calculated using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the significance value for the tumor implantation studies was calculated using the Fisher Exact Test in the program Sigma Stat (SSPS Inc, Chicago, Ill.). 
     Results 
     Characterization of the TCRm antibody 3.2G1: To establish that the 3.2G1 TCRm mAb isolated in the initial screening was HLA-A2 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize its binding specificity were performed. The first assessment utilized refolded peptide/HLA-A2 molecules as targets for testing the 3.2G1 TCRm in an ELISA.  FIG. 39A  shows the results of ELISA analysis of supernatant from hybridoma 3.2G1 versus HLA-A2/β 2 m complex refolded with its cognate peptide GVL or with one of three other irrelevant peptides. Significant reactivity was seen only in wells containing the GVL tetramer, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the antibody. Coating of each well was confirmed by ELISA using the HLA-A2 conformation specific antibody BB7.2 (data not shown). 
     To confirm the specificity of 3.2G1 TCRm for the GVL/A2 complex on the surface of T2 cells, the cells were pulsed with the specific peptide GVL, with irrelevant peptides VLQ or TMT, or with no peptide, and then stained with 3.2G1 ( FIG. 39B ). The concentration of 3.2G1 in supernatant was determined by isotype-specific ELISA, and the antibody was used at 1 μg per stain. Binding to the surface of the cells was detected with goat anti-mouse FITC labeled secondary antibody and the cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. The GVL pulsed cells shifted significantly (mean fluorescence intensity [MFI] of 141) compared to cells pulsed with the irrelevant peptides containing closely related sequences VLQ and TMT or no peptide (MFI of 7.3, 7.5 and 9.0 respectively). 
     A correlation between antibody concentration and level of staining of peptide-pulsed cells was established by titration of the antibody ( FIG. 39C ). 3.2G1 antibody was diluted over a range of 0.01 to 3 μg and then used to stain T2 cells that had been either pulsed with 20 μg/ml of GVL or not pulsed with peptide. Staining was carried out and the net MFI was determined by subtracting the no peptide MFI value from the MFI of GVL pulsed cells. The staining reactions appeared to saturate with 3.2G1 at approximately 1 μg/100 μl and retained the ability to differentiate GVL-pulsed cells from those that were not pulsed down to 0.01 μg. The MFI at 0.01 μg of antibody was 14.3 as compared to 388 for 1 μg of antibody. There is a clear relationship between antibody concentration and staining intensity of the pulsed cells. 
     To assess the effect of peptide-HLA density on the cell surface on 3.2G1 TCRm staining, T2 cells were next pulsed with varying levels of GVL peptide. The peptide was serially diluted and added to cells at concentrations ranging from 50 μg/ml to 0.1 μg/ml. The net MFI was determined by subtracting the VLQ peptide pulsed T2 cell MFI value from the MFI of GVL pulsed cells. After pulsing and addition of antibody, cells were stained and analyzed. MFI of cells stained with the 3.2G1 antibody titrated over a range of 10-150 MFI; there was much less variation with BB7.2 staining, which ranged from 250-350 MFI ( FIG. 39D ). It was concluded from these findings that 3.2G1 staining intensity is dependent on the density of the specific epitope on the surface of cells. 
     Competition studies using tetramer constructs containing either the GVL or VLQ peptide were conducted to evaluate the fine specificity of binding of antibody 3.2G1 ( FIG. 39E ). Preincubation of 3.2G1 with the GVL tetramer inhibited the final staining of GVL pulsed T2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner with 50% inhibition occurring at roughly 0.07 mg tetramer/μg of antibody. There was essentially no inhibition of staining by the VLQ tetramer at any of the concentrations tested which were up to 40-fold higher than the concentration of GVL tetramer required for 50% inhibition, suggesting that the 3.2G1 TCRm mAb specifically binds to its cognate epitope GVL/A2 on the surface of T2 cells. 
     Complement-Dependent Cytolysis using 3.2G1 antibody: Murine IgG 2a  antibodies have been found to efficiently direct complement dependent cytolysis (CDC) while the IgG1 isotype does not (Dangl et al., 1988). This fact and the corresponding ability of the IgG 2 , isotope to bind human Fc receptors (see below) led to selection of the 3.2G1 TCRm mAb. T2 cells pulsed with various peptides were used as targets for the initial 3.2G1-directed CDC analysis because they could easily be loaded to a high density with any of a number of peptides. The effect of the relative density of the appropriate peptide/A2 complex on the surface of T2 cells was probed by pulsing with GVL, TMT, a mixture of the two or no peptide while holding the antibody concentration constant at 2.5 μg/ml.  FIG. 40A  illustrates the CDC results of cells pulsed with various ratios of peptide (GVC:TMT) for both the HLA-A2 specific BB7.2 antibody and 3.2G1. BB7.2 is a murine IgG2b antibody, and this isotype also efficiently fixes complement. BB7.2-driven lysis demonstrates that there is little difference between cells pulsed with peptides at the various concentrations. The addition of 3.2G1 antibody to the cells resulted in CDC which titrated with the ratio of GVL:TMT. Lysis was not seen for non-pulsed cells (the value was below the spontaneous release in the absence of antibody) or those pulsed with TMT (CDC=2%). This experiment implies that the degree of lysis reflects the antigen density on the cell. 
     In a second experiment, an examination of the relationship between target density and cell lysis was carried out using T2 cells that were pulsed with varying levels of GVL peptide alone ( FIG. 40B ). The peptide was serially diluted and added to cells at concentrations ranging from 50 μg/ml to 0.1 μg/ml. VLQ peptide and non-pulsed cells were used as a zero-point control. After pulsing and addition of antibody at 10 μg/ml, cells were subjected to CDC analysis. The HLA-A2 specific lysis in the presence of BB7.2 varied from 53 to 70% while that driven by 3.2G1 varied from 6 to 73% ( FIG. 40B ), titrating with the dose of peptide used to pulse cells. While there was no indication of any decrease in cell lysis for BB7.2 (p=0.29), the 3.2G1 TCRm revealed a clear relationship between target density and cell lysis, with half-maximal lysis occurring at a peptide concentration around 6 μg/ml as determined by one-way ANOVA (p&lt;0.001). 
     In the final CDC experiment involving T2 cells, the specificity of lysis by the antibody using HLA-A2-peptide tetramers to compete for 3.2G1 binding was examined. 3.2G1 TCRm was serially diluted and preincubated with tetramer such that the final concentrations of TCRm varied from 9 to 0.1 μg/ml and the tetramer concentration was 2 μg/ml after addition to the CDC reaction. Tetramers refolded with the GVL peptide (competitor) substantially inhibited CDC while those refolded in the presence of VLQ peptide (non-competitor) resulted in an antibody lysis profile almost identical to that seen with no tetramer ( FIG. 40C ). Taken together, these findings support the fine recognition specificity of the 3.2G1 TCRm mAb for targeting the GVL-A2 epitope on T2 cells for cell lysis by CDC. 
     3.2G1 detects endogenous GVL peptide-HLA-A2 presented on human tumor cell lines: The ability of the 3.2G1 antibody to detect endogenously processed peptide in the context of the HLA-A2 molecule was evaluated by immunofluorescent staining of a series of tumor cell lines ( FIG. 41 ). BB7.2 mAb indicated the level of HLA-A2 expression on cells. SKOV3.A2 and SW620 are ovarian and colon cancer cell lines, respectively, while MDA-MB-231 and BT20 are breast cancer cell lines. Additional analysis of the SKOV3.A2, SW620 and MDA-MB-231 cell lines by ELISA indicated that hCGβ was present in these lines (data not shown). BT20 cells were not evaluated for the presence of hCGβ but were included as an HLA-A2 negative control. The three HLA-A2 positive tumor cell lines displayed different levels of GVL/A2 when stained with the 3.2G1 TCRm and, as might be anticipated, the staining intensity varied in accordance with the level of HLA-A2 on the surface. The HLA-A2 negative cell line, BT-20 was not stained with either 3.2G1 or BB7.2. Because of its consistently high level of expression of GVL/A2 and in order to maximize the target density, the MDA-MB-231 cell line was selected as the target for the following in vitro and in vivo assays. 
     The 3.2G1 TCRm mAb directs killing of a human tumor cell line in vitro: The breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 was subjected to competition analysis via tetramer blockade of CDC in the same manner in which the T2 cells were evaluated (described above). Cells were plated and allowed to adhere overnight before antibody or antibody plus tetramer was applied. Antibody concentration was varied from 25 to 1 μg/ml, and tetramer concentration was held constant at 6 μg/ml. CDC of cells incubated with antibody in the absence of tetramer showed an antibody concentration-dependent lysis which was paralleled by cells incubated with antibody in the presence of VLQ tetramer. This indicated that there was essentially no competition provided by the tetramer ( FIG. 42A ). In contrast, cells incubated in the presence of antibody plus GVL tetramer were almost completely protected from lysis even at the highest concentration of antibody used. These findings further demonstrate the specificity of the 3.2G1 TCRm and indicate that use of this class of antibody as a full length molecule offers a novel approach for targeting and killing tumor cells. 
     A second mechanism which plays an important role in the ability of a therapeutic antibody to control or eliminate tumors is antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) (Liu et al., 2004; Prang et al., 2005; and Clynes et al., 2000). In order to investigate the ability of the 3.2G1 TCRm mAb to direct ADCC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated from the platelet chambers of aphaeresis collection devices from anonymous donors. The cells were held in serum-free medium (AIM-V) containing 200 units/ml rhiL-2 for 2 to 7 days with media changes every 2 to 3 days in order to maintain and activate the NK population (Liu et al., 2002). To determine the level of NK activity present in the different donor samples, each preparation was evaluated using the NK-sensitive cell line K 562  at the same time the ADCC assays were carried out. All PBMC isolates were shown to exhibit lysis levels of 60% or more with one exception (35%) (data not shown). 
     MDA-MB-231 cells were first evaluated for sensitivity to ADCC as adherent cultures using five different human PBMC preparations to control for variation among the individual donors.  FIG. 42B  shows the results of these assays, which contained 10 μg/ml of 3.2G1 TCRm and were run at an E:T ratio of 30:1. The PBMC preparations varied in their ability to lyse MDA cells as might be anticipated due to differences in receptor expression by NK cells. The overall ADCC ranged from 6.8 to 9.6% with an average value of 8.7%. 
     To determine the effect epitope density had on overall lysis, 3.2G1 TCRm or the pan-HLA antibody W6/32, which is also a murine isotype IgG 2a , were used as targeting agents.  FIG. 42C  shows the results from an ADCC analysis of MDA-231 cells using two different human donor preparations at an E:T ratio of 20:1 with 3.2G1 and W6/32. The lysis values achieved for W6/32 (14.6-22.6%) were greater than those of 3.2G1 (6.4-13.4%) suggesting that lysis was at least in part dependent on epitope density. Overall, these results show a modest but consistent level of tumor-specific ADCC mediated by the 3.2G1 TCRm. 
     In vivo Analysis of 3.2G1 TCRm in Nude Mice Implanted with MDA-MB-231: To establish the ability of the 3.2G1 TCRm to inhibit tumor growth in vivo, nude mice were implanted with MDA-MB-231 tumor cells. Antibody treatment was initiated at the time of implantation with an i.p. injection of either 3.2G1 TCRm or an isotype control antibody. Tumors began to appear in the isotype control-treated mice between 36 and 43 days (week 6) after implantation while none were evident in any of the mice treated with 3.2G1. Tumors continued to appear and expand in the control mice until day 69 (week 6 tumor volume=4.5 mm 3 ; week 10, tumor volume=156 mm 3 ). Final scoring was tabulated on day 69, 21 days after the appearance of the last tumor in the control mice. At day 69, eight of ten mice in the isotype treated group had developed tumors that were 6 mm in diameter or larger while none of the nine mice in the group treated with the 3.2G1 TCRm showed evidence of tumor growth ( FIG. 43 ). The experiment was terminated at 71 days. 
       FIG. 44  illustrates that the 3.2G1 TCRm can be used therapeutically to treat athymic nude mice with established tumors. Female athymic mice were subcutaneously injected with MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and after 10 days of growth, the mice were injected with either the 3.2G1 TCRm antibody or an IgG 2a  isotype control antibody. Mice then received 3 more injections at weekly intervals. 24 days after initial injection, tumor growth was measured and plotted as tumor volume. Tumor growth in the IgG 2a  isotype control group increased almost three-fold from an initial pre-treatment mean of 105 mm 3  to a mean of 295 mm 3 . In contrast, the 3.2G1 treated group had a mean tumor volume of 62 mm 3  that was reduced to a tumor volume of 8 mm 3  after treatment. Even more impressive was that 3 out of 4 mice in the 3.2G1 treated group had no tumors. 
     These findings demonstrate that TCRm mAbs can be used therapeutically to eradicate established tumors in mice, thus demonstrating the therapeutic effectiveness of using TCRm to kill tumors via binding to a specific peptide-MHC complex on the surface of cancer cells. 
     The current study characterizes the functional properties of an antibody with the type of HLA-restricted peptide specificity associated with T cell receptors. The similarity in epitope recognition to a TCR has led us to designate this antibody a TCR mimic (TCRm) and to investigate its potential as a therapeutic agent. The 3.2G1 TCRm is a murine IgG 2a  monoclonal antibody that (1) binds to and mediates both CDC and ADCC lysis of cells bearing the GVL peptide-HLA complex on their surface and (2) inhibits the growth of a human breast cancer cell line when it is implanted into mice. 3.2G1 TCRm immunofluorescent staining intensity was proportional to the antibody concentration and to the amount of peptide present on the surface of the T2 cells. Staining was also blocked in a dose-dependent manner by GVL/A2 tetramers added to the staining buffer. Titration of the peptide used to pulse T2 cells resulted in demonstration of a direct correlation between the staining intensity and the extent of specific cell lysis by CDC. 
     In the present invention, the potential efficacy of the 3.2G1 TCRm as a therapeutic agent has been demonstrated by examining its ability to trigger CDC and ADCC of tumor cells in vitro and to prevent tumor growth in vivo as well as to eradicate tumors in vivo. Elimination of tumors in vivo by antibody therapy is thought to be the result of any or all of a number of mechanisms including but not limited to blockade of growth factor receptors, induction of apoptosis, CDC and ADCC. 
     The results obtained with our novel TCRm indicate that (1) the peptide/MHC complex is a legitimate target for cancer therapy by a naked antibody, (2) the level of expression of specific complex is high enough on at least one tumor line to lead to efficient lysis, and (3) there appears to be a threshold level of expression of the complex above which the antibody is effective. A large number of peptide antigens from tumors that are recognized by T cells have been previously characterized (Novellino et al., 2005) and now offer new targets available on the tumor surface for antibody therapy. These antibodies open access to a new range of targets available on the cell surface which are independent of the ultimate location of the original protein to which they are directed. The ability to create effective TCRm recognizing such peptides in the context of MHC antigens presents the opportunity to significantly expand the current repertoire of therapeutic antibodies. 
     Example 5 
     An antibody has been made to the peptide sequence TMTRVLQGV (SEQ ID NO:4), peptides 40-48 in the human chorionic gonadotropin β (HCGβ) protein, which is described herein above in Example 4. This TCRm was generated as described in detail herein above in Examples 1-4 and have been designated RL3A. Previous designations utilized for this antibody are IT01-2.3F9, and 3F9. 
     To establish that the TCRm mAB isolated was HLA-A2 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize its binding specificity were performed.  FIG. 45  illustrates the results of a sandwich ELISA analysis (no competition) of a supernatant from a hybridoma versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (TMT) or an irrelevant peptide (264). It is evident from  FIG. 45  that significant reactivity was seen only in wells containing the relevant TMT peptide, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the antibody. 
     To confirm the specificity of RL3A for the TMT/A2 complex on the surface of T2 cells, the cells were pulsed with decreasing amounts of the specific peptide TMT, with irrelevant peptide Her2, or with no peptide, and then stained with RL3A ( FIG. 46 ). The TMT pulsed cells shifted significantly compared to cells pulsed with irrelevant peptide or no peptide. In addition, the T2 cells pulsed with a decreasing amount of TMT peptide showed specificity of decreasing signal for staining with RL3A. 
     Next, it was determined whether the TCRm RL3A could detect endogenous TMT peptide-HLA-A2 presented on human tumor cell lines. This ability was evaluated by immunofluorescent staining of the colorectal tumor cell line COLO205 ( FIG. 46 ) and the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 ( FIG. 47 ).  FIG. 46  illustrates that RL3A was able to stain the colorectal tumor cell line, demonstrating that there is some expression of the peptide on the cell surface. Staining of the breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 with RL3A in  FIG. 48  shows a smaller shift, but there is still a positive signal for TMT peptide expression on the cell surface. 
     Example 6 
     Seven antibodies have been raised against the peptide sequence GVLPALPQV (SEQ ID NO:6), peptides 47-55 in the HCGβ protein (discussed herein above in Example 4). These TCRm&#39;s were generated as described in detail herein above in Examples 14 and have been designated RL4A-RL4G. Alternative designations for these antibodies (based on initial designations) are as follows: 
     RL4A: IG1-3.1H10 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL4B: IG1-3.2G1 (IgG2a isotype) 
     RL4C: IG1-3.3B7 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL4D: IG1-5.1B10 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL4E: IG1-5.2C12 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL4F: IG1-5.2D12 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL4G: IG1-5.4A3 (IgG1 isotype). 
     To establish that the TCRm mAB&#39;s isolated were HLA-A2 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize their binding specificity were performed.  FIG. 49  illustrates the results of competition ELISA analysis of supernatants from hybridomas versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (GVL) or an irrelevant peptide (VLQ) at various dilutions. It is evident from  FIG. 49A-B  that significant reactivity was seen only in wells containing the relevant GVL peptide, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the antibodies (RL4A-D shown in  FIG. 49A  and RL4E-G shown in  FIG. 49B ). 
     To confirm the specificities of RL4A-G for the GVL/A2 complex on the surface of T2 cells, the cells were pulsed with the specific peptide YGVL, with irrelevant peptide Her2, or with no peptide, and then stained with one of RL4A-G ( FIG. 50A-G ). The GVL pulsed cells shifted significantly compared to cells pulsed with irrelevant peptide or no peptide. 
     Next, it was determined whether the TCRm&#39;s RL4A-G could detect endogenous GVL peptide-HLA-A2 presented on human tumor cell lines. This ability was evaluated by immunofluorescent staining of the breast cancer cell lines MDA-468, MDA-231 and MCF-7.  FIG. 51  illustrates that RL4B did not stain the tumor cell line MDA-468, as expected since this cancer cell line is HLA-A2 negative. However,  FIG. 52  illustrates that RL4B was able to stain the HLA-A2 positive tumor cell line MDA-231, therefore demonstrating the specificity of the TCRm.  FIG. 53  illustrates a small shift when MCF-7 was stained with RL4D, whereas  FIG. 54  illustrates a strong shift in staining of MDA-231 with RL4D. The differences in the staining intensities are attributable to differences in peptide/MHC complex concentration on the surface of the cells; that is, more peptide/MHC complexes are present on the surface of MDA-231 cells when compared to the number of peptide/MHC complexes present on the surface of MCF-7. 
     Example 7 
     RL5 comprises a series of three antibodies that have been raised against the peptide sequence VLQGVLPAL (SEQ ID NO:5), residues 44-54 in the HCGβ protein (as discussed in detail above in Example 4). These TCRm&#39;s were generated as described in detail herein above in Examples 1-4 and have been designated RL5A-RL5C. Alternative designations for these antibodies (based on initial designations) are as follows: 
     RL5A: IV1-1.5D8 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL5B: IV1-1.5E12 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL5C: IV1-1.1 D3 (IgG1 isotype). 
     To establish that the TCRm mAB&#39;s isolated were HLA-A2 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize their binding specificity were performed.  FIG. 55A  illustrates the results of competition ELISA analysis of supernatants from hybridomas from RL5A and RL5B versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (VLQ) or irrelevant peptide (GVL), whereas  FIG. 55B  illustrates the results of sandwich ELISA analysis (no competition) of supernatants from hybridomas from RL5C versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (VLQ) or irrelevant peptides (eIF4G, TMT and GVL). It is evident from  FIG. 55A-B  that significant reactivity was seen only in wells containing the relevant VLQ peptide, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the antibodies. In contrast, IV1-1.5H7 and IV1-1.6A6 are provided as examples of mAB&#39;s that were isolated by were non-reactive to the specific target. 
     To confirm the specificities of RL5A-C for the VLQ/A2 complex on the surface of T2 cells, the cells were pulsed with the specific peptide VLQ, with irrelevant peptide TMT, or with no peptide, and then stained with one of RL5A-C ( FIG. 56A-C ). The VLQ pulsed cells shifted significantly compared to cells pulsed with irrelevant peptide or no peptide. 
     Example 8 
     The p68 protein is a member of the Dead box family of RNA helicases. These proteins are found in all organisms from bacteria to humans and have been shown to be involved in virtually all cellular processes that require manipulation of RNA structure, including transcription, pre-mRNA processing, RNA degradation, RNA export, ribosome assembly and translation (Bates, G J et al. 2005). Moreover, the p68 protein is overexpressed in colorectal tumors (Causevic, M. et al. 2001). The peptide sequence YLLPAIVHI (SEQ ID NO:7) from p68 has recently been found to be presented by the HLA-A*0201 class I complex in breast carcinoma cell lines (US published patent application US 2005/0003483, published by Hildebrand et al. on Jan. 6, 2005, which has previously been incorporated herein by reference). Therefore, the methods of the present invention were utilized to produce TCRm antibodies against the YLLPAIVHI (SEQ ID NO:7) peptide-HLA-A2 complexes. 
     Five antibodies have been raised against the peptide sequence YLLPAIVHI (SEQ ID NO:7), from the p68 protein. These TCRm&#39;s were generated as described in detail herein above in Examples 1-4 and have been designated RL6A-RL6E. Alternative designations for these antibodies (based on initial designations) are as follows: 
     RL6A: IY01-1.1D4 (IgG2a isotype) 
     RL6B: IY01-3.1C2 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL6C: IY01-3.1A5 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL6D: IY01-3.1F5 (IgG2a isotype) 
     RL6E: IY01-3.1A12 (IgG2a isotype). 
     To establish that the TCRm mAB&#39;s isolated were HLA-A2 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize their binding specificity were performed.  FIG. 57  illustrates the results of ELISA analysis of supernatants from hybridomas versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (YLL) or an irrelevant peptide (GVL). It is evident from  FIG. 57A-B  that significant reactivity was seen only in wells containing the relevant YLL peptide, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the antibodies (RL6A-C shown in  FIG. 57A  and RL6D-E shown in  FIG. 57B ). 
     To confirm the specificities of RL6A-E for the YLL/A2 complex on the surface of T2 cells, the cells were pulsed with the specific peptide YLL, with irrelevant peptide TMT, or with no peptide, and then stained with one of RL6A-E ( FIG. 58A-E ). The YLL pulsed cells shifted significantly compared to cells pulsed with irrelevant peptide or no peptide. 
     Next, it was determined whether the TCRm&#39;s RL6A-E could detect endogenous YLL peptide-HLA-A2 presented on human tumor cell lines. This ability was evaluated by immunofluorescent staining of the tumor cell line SKOV3.A2, an ovarian cancer cell line.  FIG. 59A-E  illustrates that all of the TCRm&#39;s RL6A-E were able to stain the tumor cell line, thus demonstrating the ability of these TCRm&#39;s to recognize peptide-HLA-A2 complexes present on the tumor cell surface. 
     Example 9 
     The CD19 protein is expressed on the surface of B cells. Recent studies have identified several immunogenic peptides derived from CD19 antigen that were capable of inducing antigen-specific CTLs against B cell malignancies (Bae et al., 2005). As a follow-up to these studies, a TCRm antibody was developed against the TLAYLIFCL (SEQ ID NO:8; amino acids 296-304 of the CD 19 protein)-HLA-A*0201 complex with the goal of using the TCRm for validation of this epitope on B cell malignancies. 
     Three antibodies have been raised against the peptide sequence TLAYLIFCL (SEQ ID NO:8), residues 296-304 of the CD19 protein. These TCRm&#39;s were generated as described in detail herein above in Examples 14 and have been designated RL7A, RL7C and RL7D. Alternative designations for these antibodies (based on initial designations) are as follows: 
     RL7A: ITL01-1.4E4 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL7C: ITL01-3.4E11 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL7D: ITL01-5.2C4 (IgG2a isotype). 
     To establish that the TCRm mAB&#39;s isolated were HLA-A2 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize their binding specificity were performed.  FIG. 60  illustrates the results of ELISA analysis of supernatants from hybridomas versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (TLA) or an irrelevant peptide (KLM). It is evident from  FIG. 60  that significant reactivity was seen only in wells containing the relevant TLA peptide, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the antibodies. 
     To confirm the specificities of RL7A, RL7C and RL7D for the TLA/A2 complex on the surface of T2 cells, the cells were pulsed with the specific peptide TLA, with irrelevant peptide KLM, or with no peptide, and then stained with an isotype control and RL7A ( FIG. 61A ), RL7C ( FIG. 61B ), or RL7D ( FIG. 61C ). The TLA pulsed cells shifted significantly compared to cells pulsed with irrelevant peptide or no peptide. 
     Example 10 
     The Gp100 protein is a differentiation antigen widely expressed in melanomas and is a target under consideration for cellular immunotherapy. Studies have identified the immunogenic peptide YLEPGPVT (SEQ ID NO:9; amino acids 280-288 of Gp100)-HLA-A2 complex as a potential candidate for vaccine development and T cell therapy (Yang et al., 2002; Morgan et al., 2003). Therefore, a TCRm reactive against this epitope was desired to validate its expression on cancer cells. 
     An antibody was raised against the peptide sequence YLEPGPVTV (SEQ ID NO:9), residues 280-288 of the Gp100 protein. This TCRm was generated as described in detail herein above in Examples 1-4 and has been designated RL8A. It is an IgG1 isotype antibody. 
     To establish that the TCRm mAB RL8A was HLA-A2 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize their binding specificity were performed.  FIG. 62  illustrates the results of ELISA analysis of supernatant from a hybridoma versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (YLEV) or an irrelevant peptide (KLM), tested at several dilutions of supernatant. It is evident from  FIG. 62  that significant reactivity was seen only in wells containing the relevant YLEV peptide, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the RL8A antibody. 
     To confirm the specificity of RL8A for the YLEV/A2 complex on the surface of T2 cells, the cells were pulsed with the specific peptide YLEV, with irrelevant peptide KLM, or with no peptide, and then stained with RL8A ( FIG. 63 ). The YLEV pulsed cells shifted significantly compared to cells pulsed with irrelevant peptide or no peptide. 
     Example 11 
     The NY-ESO-1 protein is a cancer/testis antigen expressed in normal adult tissues solely in the testicular germ cells of normal adults and in various cancers (Sugita et al., 2004). NY-ESO-1 antigen induces potent humoral and cellular immune responses. It was initially discovered by serological screening of cDNA expression libraries (SEREX). Recent studies have identified several immunogenic peptides derived from NY-ESO-1 presented by HLA-A*0201 that were capable of inducing strong antigen-specific CTLs against tumor cells (Jager et al., 1998). As a follow-up to these studies, TCRm antibodies were developed against the modified SLLMWITQV peptide (SEQ ID NO:10; amino acids 157-165)-HLA-A*0201 complex with the goal of using these TCRm&#39;s for validation of this epitope on cancer cells. In addition to recognizing the modified peptide, all anti-NY-ESO-1 peptide-HLA-A*0201 reactive TCRm antibodies specifically reacted with the wild-type peptide from NY-ESO-1 (SLLMWITQC; SEQ ID NO:15; amino acids 157-165). 
     A group of seven antibodies has been raised against the modified peptide sequence SLLMWITQV (SEQ ID NO: 10), residues 157-165 from the NY-ESO-1 protein. These TCRm&#39;s were generated as described in detail herein above in Examples 14 and have been designated RL9A-RL9G. Alternative designations for these antibodies (based on initial designations) are as follows: 
     RL9A: ISLLV01-5.2G5 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL9B: ISLLV01-3.2A3 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL9C: ISLLV01-3.2D9 (IgG2a isotype) 
     RL9D: ISLLV01-3.2G2 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL9E: ISLLV01-3.3D3 (IgG2a isotype) 
     RL9F: ISLLV01-4.2B11 (IgG2a isotype) 
     RL9G: ISLLV01-1.1G2 (IgG1 isotype). 
     To establish that the TCRm mAB&#39;s isolated were HLA-A2 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize their binding specificity were performed.  FIG. 64A-B  illustrates the results of ELISA analysis of supernatants from hybridomas versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (SLLV) or irrelevant peptide (eIF4G in  FIG. 64A  and GIL in  FIG. 64B ). It is evident from  FIG. 64A-B  that significant reactivities were seen only in wells containing the relevant SLLV peptide, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the antibodies. 
     To confirm the specificities of RL9A-G for the SLLV/A2 complex on the surface of T2 cells, the cells were pulsed with the specific peptide SLLV, with irrelevant peptides (ILA, TLA, YLEV, and YLL), or with no peptide, and then stained with one of RL9A-G ( FIG. 65A-G , respectively). The SLLV pulsed cells shifted significantly compared to cells pulsed with irrelevant peptide or no peptide. 
     Next, it was determined whether the TCRm RL9A could detect endogenous or wild-type SLLV peptide-HLA-A2 presented on human tumor cell lines. This ability was evaluated by immunofluorescent staining of the tumor cell lines ST486 (Burkift&#39;s Lymphoma cell line;  FIG. 66 ) and U266 (multiple myeloma cell line;  FIG. 67 ).  FIGS. 66-67  illustrate that the TCRm RL9A was able to stain the tumor cell line for multiple myeloma, which is HLA-A2 positive and NY-ESO-1 positive, but not Burkitt&#39;s lymphoma, which is HLA-A2 positive but NY-ESO-1 negative; such results clearly demonstrate the ability of this TCRm to recognize peptide-HLA-A2 complexes present on the tumor cell surface. 
     Example 12 
     Human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT) is a widely expressed tumor-associated antigen (TAA) recognized by CTLs (Vonderheide et al., 2004). A nine amino acid peptide sequence ILAKFLHWL (SEQ ID NO:11) from hTERT was recently identified and found to tightly bind HLA-A*0201. Therefore, the methods of the present invention were utilized to produce TCRm antibodies against this peptide-HLA-A2 complex. 
     An antibody has been raised against the peptide sequence ILAKFLHWL (SEQ ID NO:11), residues 540-548 of the hTERT protein. This TCRm was generated as described in detail herein above in Examples 1-4 and has been designated RL10A. A previous designation utilized for this antibody is ILA01-4.1H2; this is an IgG1 antibody. 
     To establish that the isolated TCRm RL10A was HLA-A2 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize its binding specificity were performed.  FIG. 68  illustrates the results of ELISA analysis of a supernatant from a hybridoma versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (ILA) or an irrelevant peptide (VLQV). It is evident from  FIG. 68  that significant reactivity was seen only in wells containing the relevant ILA peptide, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the antibody. 
     To confirm the specificity of RL10A for the ILA/A2 complex on the surface of T2 cells, the cells were pulsed with the specific peptide ILA, with irrelevant peptides (SLLV, TLA, YLEV, or YLL), or with no peptide, and then stained with RL10A and an isotype control ( FIG. 69 ). The ILA pulsed cells shifted significantly compared to cells pulsed with irrelevant peptide or no peptide. 
     Next, it was determined whether the TCRm RL10A could detect endogenous ILA peptide-HLA-A2 presented on human tumor cell lines. This ability was evaluated by immunofluorescent staining of the tumor cell lines MDA-MB-231, a breast cancer cell line ( FIG. 70 ).  FIG. 70  illustrates that the TCRm RL10A was able to stain the tumor cell line for breast cancer, thus demonstrating the ability of this TCRm to recognize peptide-HLA-A2 complexes present on the tumor cell surface. 
     Example 13 
     The reticulocalbin protein is expressed in highly invasive breast cancer cell lines but not expressed in poorly invasive ones. Although its function is still unknown, reticulcalbin is implicated in tumor cell invasiveness because of its differential expression in breast tumor cell lines (Liu et al., 1997). However, little is known regarding its processing and peptide presentation or its ability to activate CTL responses. The reticulocalbin peptide GPRTAALGLL (SEQ ID NO:12) has been identified by the methods of Hildebrand et al. (US Published Application No. 2002/0197672, published Dec. 26, 2002, such application being previously incorporated herein by reference) as binding to HLA-B*0702. Therefore, the GPRTAALGLL-HLA-B*0702 complex was utilized for immunization of mice, and an antibody raised against this epitope has been characterized and used in validation studies, as described in detail herein below. 
     An antibody has been raised against the peptide sequence GPRTAALGLL (SEQ ID NO:12), from the reticulocalbin protein, in the context of HLA-B*0702. This TCRm was generated using a modified protocol from that described in detail herein above in Examples 14. The modified protocol used secreted HLA-B*0702 isolated from Cell Pharm cultures and loaded with the GPR peptide (such HLA-peptide complex being provided by Pure Protein, LLC, Oklahoma City, Okla.). Peptide-loaded monomer (50 mg/injection) in Quil A adjuvant was then used to immunize Balb/c mice (3 female mice 6-8 weeks of age) as described in detail herein above in Examples 14. Therefore, the major differences in this Example are that (1) the immunogen was produced in mammalian cells, and (2) the immunogen was in a monomeric form. This TCRm antibody has been designated RL11A. A previous designation utilized for this antibody is IB702-1.1D3; this is an IgG1 antibody. 
     To establish that the isolated TCRm RL11A was HLA-B7 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize its binding specificity were performed.  FIG. 71  illustrates the results of ELISA analysis of a supernatant from a hybridoma versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (GPR) or an irrelevant peptide (RPYSNVSNL (SEQ ID NO:14); another peptide restricted by HLA-B*0702). It is evident from  FIG. 71  that significant reactivity was seen only in wells containing the relevant GPR peptide, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the antibody RL11A. 
     To confirm the specificity of RL11A for the GPR/B7 complex on the surface of T2 cells, the cells were pulsed with the specific peptide GPR, with irrelevant peptides (RPY or TPQ), or with no peptide, and then stained with RL11A and an isotype control ( FIG. 72 ). The GPR pulsed cells shifted significantly compared to cells pulsed with irrelevant peptide or no peptide. 
     Example 14 
     The Mage-3 protein is a cancer/testis antign that is expressed in several malignant tumors but not in normal tissues except for testicular germ cells (Dhodapkar et al., 2003). In this example, an immunodominant peptide (EVDPIGHLY, SEQ ID NO:13) from MAG-3A antigen has been selected for preparation of peptide-HLA-A*0101 tetramers. The tetramers were used for immunizing Balb/c mice in order to raise TCRm antibodies against this epitope for validation of epitope expression in cancer cells. 
     A group of four antibodies has been raised against the peptide sequence EVDPIGHLY (SEQ ID NO:13), from the Mage-3 protein, expressed in HLA-A*0101. These TCRm&#39;s were generated as described in detail herein above in Examples 1-4 and have been designated RL12A-RL12D. Alternative designations for these antibodies (based on initial designations) are as follows: 
     RL12A: EVD01-1.1E1 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL12B: EVD01-1.1H1 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL12C: EVD01-1.2B81 (IgG1 isotype) 
     RL12D: EVD01-1.3C9 (IgG1 isotype). 
     To establish that the TCRm mAB&#39;s isolated were HLA-A1 restricted and peptide-specific, a series of assays to characterize their binding specificity were performed.  FIG. 73  illustrates the results of ELISA analysis of supernatants from hybridomas versus HLA-peptide complexes refolded with cognate peptide (EVD) or irrelevant peptide (EAD). It is evident from  FIG. 73  that significant reactivities were seen only in wells containing the relevant EVD peptide, indicating the TCR-like specificity of the antibodies. 
     Example 15 
     In parent provisional application U.S. Ser. No. 60/810,079 and related utility application Atty Dkt No. 66802.103, five peptides were identified by the methods of Hildebrand et al. (previously described and incorporated herein by reference) as being unique on breast cancer cells in comparison to the control cell line (Table II). In addition, six peptides were identified as upregulated on breast cancer cells (Table III). 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE II 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Peptide Epitopes Unique to Breast Cancer 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                   
                 SEQ ID NO: 
                   
               
               
                   
                 SEQ ID 
                   
                 FOR SOURCE 
               
               
                 SEQUENCE 
                 NO: 
                 SOURCE PROTEIN 
                 PROTEIN 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 KIGEGTYGV 
                 16 
                 Cyclin Dependent 
                 27 
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 Kinase 2 (CDK2) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 ILDQKINEV 
                 17 
                 Ornithine Decarbox- 
                 28 
               
               
                   
                   
                 ylase (ODC1) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 GLNEEIARV 
                 18 
                 Kinetochore Associ- 
                 29 
               
               
                   
                   
                 ated 2 (KNTC2 or HEC1) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 FLSELTQQL 
                 19 
                 Macrophage Migration 
                 30 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Inhibitory Factor 
               
               
                   
                   
                 (MIF) 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 ALMPVLNQV 
                 20 
                 Human mRNA Transport 
                 31 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Regulator (hMtr3p) 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE III 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Peptide Epitopes Upregulated in Breast Cancer 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                   
                 SEQ ID NO: 
                   
               
               
                   
                 SEQ 
                   
                 FOR SOURCE 
               
               
                 SEQUENCE 
                 ID NO: 
                 SOURCE PROTEIN 
                 PROTEIN 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 KILDLETQL 
                 21 
                 ODF2/Cenexin 
                 32 
                   
               
               
                   
               
               
                 AQYEHDLEVA 
                 22 
                 Ran GTPase 
                 33 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 TLYEAVREV 
                 23 
                 RPL10a 
                 34 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 SLLEKSLGL 
                 24 
                 P18 
                 35 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 SLFGGSVKL 
                 25 
                 PDCD6IP 
                 36 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 SLFPGKLEV 
                 26 
                 Flightless Homolog 
                 37 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     In this Example, these nine peptides were selected for preparation of peptide HLA-A*0201 tetramers. The tetramers are used for immunizing mice in order to raise TCRm antibodies against each epitope. The TCRm&#39;s are generated as described in detail herein above in Examples 1-4. It is then established that the TCRm mAb&#39;s so produced are HLA-A2 restricted and peptide-specific. Next, it is determined that these TCRm&#39;s recognize peptide-HLA-A2 complexes present on the tumor cell surface. 
     SUMMARY 
     Shown in  FIG. 74  is a timeline of the protocol of generating peptide-MHC specific monoclonal antibodies of the presently disclosed and claimed invention. As evidenced by the figure and the examples provided herein above, a rapid method of generating peptide-MHC specific monoclonal antibodies has been demonstrated, wherein the peptide-MHC specific monoclonal antibodies can be generated in 8-12 weeks. 
     The value of monoclonal antibodies which recognized peptide-MHC complexes has been recognized for some time, as described in the Background of the Prior Art section, and several groups have generated antibodies of this type for use in investigating the characteristics of the complexes (Murphy et al., 1992; Eastman et al., 1996; Dadaglio et al., 1997; Messaoudi et al., 1999; Porgador et al., 1997; Rognan et al., 2000; Polakova et al., 2000; Denkberg et al., 2003; Denkberg et al., 2002; Biddison et al., 2003; Cohen et al., 2003; and Steenbakkers et al., 2003). There are several aspects of the presently disclosed and claimed invention that are novel over the prior art methods, and which overcome the disadvantages and defects of the prior art. First, the method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention results in hybridoma cells producing high affinity, full-length antibodies to specific peptide-HLA complexes. An example of the affinity range achieved is shown by the 4F7 monoclonal antibody (see for example,  FIG. 23  and Example 2), which has a K D  of approximately 1 nM. Affinity measurements for the 1B8 monoclonal antibody indicate that it is in the same affinity range. The affinity of these two antibodies is high enough that they can distinctly stain breast cancer cell lines, and this aspect of the presently disclosed and claimed invention contrasts sharply with the weak staining reported for antibodies from a phage display library (Denkberg et al., 2003). 
     Second, in contrast to the prior art methods that utilize phage display libraries, the product produced by the method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention is “ready to use”; it is a whole antibody which is easy to purify and characterize, and does not require any further manipulation to achieve expression of significant quantities of material. 
     Third, the method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention requires significantly less time to product when compared to the prior art methods. The method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention can complete the cycle from immunization to identification of candidate hybridomas in as few as eight weeks, as shown in  FIG. 74  and as achieved as described herein for monoclonal antibody 1B8. The method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention is both rapid and reproducible. 
     Fourth, the immunogen employed in the method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention is novel. The immunogen consists of peptide-HLA complexes that are loaded solely with the peptide of interest. The immunogens are made in a form which allows production and characterization of milligram quantities of highly purified material which correctly presents the three dimensional structure of the peptide-HLA complex. This complex can be easily manipulated to form higher order multimers. Preliminary data indicates that the use of tetrameric forms of the peptide-HLA immunogen is more efficient at generating a specific response than are monomeric or mixed multimeric forms of the immunogen. 
     Fifth, the screening processes described in the presently claimed and disclosed invention are unique and completely describe methods to discern the presence of anti-peptide/HLA antibodies in the serum of immunized mice, even in the presence of antibodies which react with other epitopes present on the complex. The screening processes also produce methods to identify and characterize monoclonal antibodies produced after hybridoma fusion. 
     The presently disclosed and claimed invention overcomes obstacles encountered in prior art methods, which reported low yields of specific monoclonal responses (Eastman et al., 1996; Dadaglio et al., 1997; and Andersen et al., 1996). The antibodies generated by the method of the presently disclosed and claimed invention are also clearly distinct from those reported from phage libraries. As an example, a phage-derived Fab which recognized hTERT-HLA-A2 complex would stain hTERT-peptide pulsed HLA-A2 positive cells (Lev et al., 2002), but would not stain tumor cells (Parkhurst et al., 2004), indicating that this prior art antibody had either low specificity, or low affinity, or both. Such an antibody would not be useful in applications described herein for the presently disclosed and claimed invention, such as but not limited to, epitope validation in vaccine development and other clinical applications. 
     Thus, in accordance with the present invention, there has been provided a method of producing antibodies that recognize peptides associated with a tumorigenic or disease state, wherein the antibodies will mimic the specificity of a T cell receptor, that fully satisfies the objectives and advantages set forth hereinabove. Although the invention has been described in conjunction with the specific drawings, experimentation, results and language set forth hereinabove, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications, and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, it is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications and variations that fall within the spirit and broad scope of the invention. 
     REFERENCES 
     The following references, to the extent that they provide exemplary procedural or other details supplementary to those set forth herein, are specifically incorporated herein by reference.
     Altman, J. D. et al. Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes. Science, 274:94-96 (1996).   Andersen, P. S. et al. A recombinant antibody with the antigen-specific, major histocompatibility complex-restricted specificity of T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 93:1820-1824 (1996).   Apostolopoulos, V., Haurum, J. S. &amp; McKenzie, I. F. MUC1 peptide epitopes associated with five different H-2 class I molecules. Eur J Immunol, 27:2579-2587 (1997).   Bae, J., Martinson, J. A., and Klingemann, H. G. Identification of CD19 and CD20 peptides for induction of antigen-specific CTLs against B-cell malignancies. Clinical Cancer Research, 11(4):1629-38 (2005).   Barfoed, A. M., et al. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte clones, established by stimulation with the HLA-A2 binding p5365-73 wild type peptide loaded on dendritic cells in vitro, specifically recognize and lyse HLA-A2 tumour cells overexpressing the p53 protein. Scand J Immunol, 51(2): 128-33 (2000).   Bates G J, Nicol S M, Wilson B J, Jacobs A M F, Bourdon J C, Lane D P, Perkins N D, Fuller-Pace F V. The DEAD box protein p68: a novel transcriptional coactivator of the p53 tumor suppressor. The EMBO Journal. 24: 543-553 (2005).   Biddison, W. E., et al. Tax and M1 peptide/HLA-A2-specific Fabs and T cell receptors recognize nonidentical structural features on peptide/HLA-A2 complexes. J Immunol, 171:3064-3074 (2003).   Bohm, C. M. et al. Identification of HLA-A2-restricted epitopes of the tumor-associated antigen MUC2 recognized by human cytotoxic T cells. Int J Cancer, 75:688493 (1998).   Brooks, S. C., Locke, E. R. &amp; Soule, H. D. Estrogen receptor in a human cell line (MCF-7) from breast carcinoma. J Biol Chem, 248:6251-6253 (1973).   Brossart, P. et al. Identification of HLA-A2-restricted T-cell epitopes derived from the MUC1 tumor antigen for broadly applicable vaccine therapies. Blood, 93:4309-4317 (1999).   Bushell, M., et al. Cleavage of polypeptide chain initiation factor eIF4G1 during apoptosis in lymphoma cells: characterisation of an internal fragment generated by caspase-3-mediated cleavage.” Cell Death Differ, 7(7): 628-36 (2003).   Causevic M, Hislop R G, Kernohan N M, Carey F A, Kay R A, Steele R J C and Fuller-Pace FV. Overexpression and poly-ubiquitylation of the DEAD-box RNA helicase p68 in colorectal tumors. Oncogene 20: 7734-7743 (2001).   Chames, P. et al. TCR-like human antibodies expressed on human CTLs mediate antibody affinity-dependent cytolytic activity. J Immunol, 169:1110-1118 (2002).   Chikamatsu, K. et al. Generation of anti-p53 cytotoxic T lymphocytes from human peripheral blood using autologous dendritic cells. Clin Cancer Res, 5:1281-1288 (1999).   Clemens, M. J. Targets and mechanisms for the regulation of translation in malignant transformation.” Oncogene, 23(18): 3180-8 (2004).   Clinchy, B. et al. The growth and metastasis of human, HER-2/neu-overexpressing tumor cell lines in male SCID mice. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 61:217-228 (2000).   Cohen, C. J., Denkberg, G., Lev, A., Epel, M. &amp; Reiter, Y. Recombinant antibodies with MHC-restricted, peptide-specific, T-cell receptor-like specificity: new tools to study antigen presentation and TCR-peptide-MHC interactions. J Mol Recognit, 16:324-332 (2003).   Coussens, L. et al. Tyrosine kinase receptor with extensive homology to EGF receptor shares chromosomal location with neu oncogene. Science, 230:1132-1139 (1985).   Cox et al. Identification of a peptide recognized by five melanoma-specific human cytotoxic T cell lines. Science, 264:716-719 (1994).   Dadaglio, G., et al., Characterization and quantitation of peptide-MHC complexes produced from hen egg lysozyme using a monoclonal antibody. Immunity, 6(6):727-38 (1997).   DeGroot et al. Rapid determination of HLA B*07 ligands from the West Nile virus NY99 genome. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 7:4 (2001).   DeLeo, A. B. p53-based immunotherapy of cancer. Crit. Rev Immunol, 18:29-35 (1998).   Denkberg, G., E. Klechevsky, and Y. Reiter, Modification of a tumor-derived peptide at an HLA-A2 anchor residue can alter the conformation of the MHC-peptide complex: probing with TCR-like recombinant antibodies. J Immunol, 169(8):4399407 (2002).   Denkberg, G. et al. Direct visualization of distinct T cell epitopes derived from a melanoma tumor-associated antigen by using human recombinant antibodies with MHC-restricted T cell receptor-like specificity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 99:9421-9426 (2002).   Denkberg, G. et al. Selective targeting of melanoma and APCs using a recombinant antibody with TCR-like specificity directed toward a melanoma differentiation antigen. J. Immunol. 171:2197-2207 (2003).   Dhodapkar M V, Osman K, Teruya-Feldstein J, Filippa D, Hedvat C V, Iversen K, Kolb D, Geller M D, Hassoun H, Kewalramani T, Comenzo R L, Coplan K, Chen Y T, Jungbluth A A. Expression of cancer/testis (CT) antigens MAGE-AL, MAGE-A3, MAGE-A4, CT-7, and NY-ESO-1 in malignant gammopathies is heterogeneous and correlates with site, stage and risk status of disease. Cancer Immunity, 3:9-17 (2003).   Disis, M. L. et al. Existent T-cell and antibody immunity to HER-2/neu protein in patients with breast cancer. Cancer Res, 54:16-20 (1994).   Diwan, M. &amp; Park, T. G. Stabilization of recombinant interferon-alpha by pegylation for encapsulation in PLGA microspheres. Int J Pharm, 252:111-122 (2003).   Dols, A. et al. Identification of tumor-specific antibodies in patients with breast cancer vaccinated with gene-modified allogeneic tumor cells. J Immunother, 26:163-170 (2003).   Eastman, S., et al., A study of complexes of class II invariant chain peptide: major histocompatibility complex class II molecules using a new complex-specific monoclonal antibody. Eur J Immunol, 26(2):385-93 (1996).   Fingeroth, J. D. et al. Epstein-Barr virus receptor of human B lymphocytes is the C3d receptor CR2. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 81:4510-4514 (1984).   Fisk, B., Blevins, T. L., Wharton, J. T. &amp; Ioannides, C. G. Identification of an immunodominant peptide of HER-2/neu protooncogene recognized by ovarian tumor-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte lines. J Exp Med, 181:2109-2117 (1995).   Glennie, M. J. &amp; van de Winkel, J. G. Renaissance of cancer therapeutic antibodies. Drug Discov Today, 8:503-510 (2003).   Gnjatic, S. et al. Accumulation of the p53 protein allows recognition by human CTL of a wild-type p53 epitope presented by breast carcinomas and melanomas. J Immunol, 160:328-333 (1998).   Hickman, H. D. et al. C-terminal epitope tagging facilitates comparative ligand mapping from MHC class I positive cells. Hum Immunol, 61:1339-1346 (2000).   Hickman, H. D. et al. Cutting Edge: Class I presentation of host peptides following HIV infection. J Immunol, 171:22-26 (2003).   Hickman, H. D. et al. Toward a definition of self: proteomic evaluation of the class I peptide repertoire. Immunol, 172:2944-2952 (2004).   Hoffmann, T. K., H. Bier, et al. p53 as an immunotherapeutic target in head and neck cancer. Adv Otorhinolaryngol, 62:15140 (2005).   Irsch, J. et al. Isolation and characterization of allergen-binding cells from normal and allergic donors. Immunotechnology, 1:115-125 (1995).   Jager, E., Chen, Y T, Drijfhout, J W, Karbach, J, Ringhoffer, M, Jager, D, Arand, M. et al. Simultaneous humoral and cellular immune response against cancer-testis antigen NY-ESO-1: definition of human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-binding peptide epitopes. J Exp Med, 187:265-270 (1998).   Jager, E., Jager, D. &amp; Knuth, A. Antigen-specific immunotherapy and cancer vaccines. Int J Cancer, 106:817-820 (2003).   Joseph, A. M., Babcock, G. J. &amp; Thorley-Lawson, D. A. Cells expressing the Epstein-Barr virus growth program are present in and restricted to the naive B-cell subset of healthy tonsils. J Virol, 74:9964-9971 (2000).   Kearns-Jonker, M. et al. EBV binds to lymphocytes of transgenic mice that express the human CR2 gene. Virus Res, 50:85-94 (1997).   Knutson, K. L., Schiffman, K., Cheever, M. A. &amp; Disis, M. L. Immunization of cancer patients with a HER-2/neu, HLA-A2 peptide, p369-377, results in short-lived peptide-specific immunity. Clin Cancer Res, 8:1014-1018 (2002).   Kodituwakku, A. P., Jessup, C., Zola, H. &amp; Roberton, D. M. Isolation of antigen-specific B cells. Immunol Cell Biol, 81:163-170 (2003).   Kohler, G. &amp; Milstein, C. Continuous cultures of fused cells secreting antibody of predefined specificity. Nature, 256:495-497 (1975).   Lev, A. et al. Isolation and characterization of human recombinant antibodies endowed with the antigen-specific, major histocompatibility complex-restricted specificity of T cells directed toward the widely expressed tumor T-cell epitopes of the telomerase catalytic subunit. Cancer Res, 62:3184-3194 (2002).   Liu, A. H., Creadon, G. &amp; Wysocki, L. J. Sequencing heavy- and light-chain variable genes of single B-hybridoma cells by total enzymatic amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 89:7610-7614 (1992).   Liu Z, Brattain M G, and Appert H. Links Differential display of reticulocalbin in the highly invasive cell line, MDA-MB-435, versus the poorly invasive cell line, MCF-7. Biochem Biophys Res Commun., 231(2):283-9 (1997).   Luescher, I. F. et al. HLA photoaffinity labeling reveals overlapping binding of homologous melanoma-associated gene peptides by HLA-A1, HLA-A29, and HLA-B44. J Biol Chem, 271:12463-12471 (1996).   Maeurer, M. J., Martin, D., Elder, E., Storkus, W. J. &amp; Lotze, M. T. Detection of naturally processed and HLA-A1-presented melanoma T-cell epitopes defined by CD8(+) T-cells&#39; release of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor but not by cytolysis. Clin Cancer Res, 2:87-95 (1996).   Menendez, J. A., R. Lupu, et al. Inhibition of tumor-associated fatty acid synthase hyperactivity induces synergistic chemosensitization of HER-2/neu-overexpressing human breast cancer cells to docetaxel (taxotere). Breast Cancer Res Treat, 84(2): 183-95 (2004a).   Menendez, J. A., S. Ropero, et al. Omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid gamma-linolenic acid (18:3n6) enhances docetaxel (Taxotere) cytotoxicity in human breast carcinoma cells: Relationship to lipid peroxidation and HER-2/neu expression. Oncol Rep, 11(6): 1241-52 (2004b).   Messaoudi, I., J. LeMaoult, and J. Nikolic-Zugic, The mode of ligand recognition by two peptide:MHC class I-specific monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol, 163(6):3286-94 (1999).   Miki, T., Yano, S., Hanibuchi, M. &amp; Sone, S. Bone metastasis model with multiorgan dissemination of human small-cell lung cancer (SBC-5) cells in natural killer cell-depleted SCID mice. Oncol Res, 12:209-217 (2000).   Morgan, R A, Dudley, M E, Yu, Y Y L, Zheng, Z, Robbins, R F, Theoret, M R, Wunderlich, J R, Hughes, M S, Restifo, N P, and Rosenberg, S A. J. Immunol., 171:3287-3295 (2003).   Morley, S. J., et al. Differential requirements for caspase-8 activity in the mechanism of phosphorylation of eIF2a, cleavage of eIF4G1 and signaling events associated with the inhibition of protein synthesis in apoptotic Jurkat T cells. FEBS Lett, 477(3): 229-36 (2000).   Morley, S. J., et al. Initiation factor modifications in the preapoptotic phase. Cell Death Differ, 12(6): 571-84 (2005).   Murphy, D. B., et al., Monoclonal antibody detection of a major self peptide. MHC class II complex. Immunol, 148(11): 3483-91 (1992).   Nahta, R., Hung, M. C. &amp; Esteva, F. J. The HER-2-targeting antibodies trastuzumab and pertuzumab synergistically inhibit the survival of breast cancer cells. Cancer Res, 64:2343-2346 (2004).   Nikitina, E. Y., et al. Dendritic cells transduced with full-length wild-type p53 generate antitumor cytotoxic T lymphocytes from peripheral blood of cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res, 7(1): 127-35 (2001).   Oshiba, A., Renz, H., Yata, J. &amp; Gelfand, E. W. Isolation and characterization of human antigen-specific B lymphocytes. Clin Immunol Immunopathol, 72:342-349 (1994).   Parkhurst, M. R., et al., Immunization of patients with the hTERT:540-548 peptide induces peptide-reactive T lymphocytes that do not recognize tumors endogenously expressing telomerase. Clin Cancer Res, 10(14): 4688-98 (2004).   Polakova, K., et al., Antibodies directed against the MHC-1 molecule H-2Dd complexed with an antigenic peptide: similarities to a T cell receptor with the same specificity. J Immunol, 165(10): 5703-12 (2000).   Porgador, A., Yewdell, J. W., Deng, Y., Bennink, J. R. &amp; Germain, R. N. Localization, quantitation, and in situ detection of specific peptide-MHC class I complexes using a monoclonal antibody. Immunity, 6:715-726 (1997).   Reisbach, G., Gebhart, E. &amp; Cailleau, R. Sister chromatid exchanges and proliferation kinetics of human metastatic breast tumor cells lines. Anticancer Res, 2:257-260 (1982).   Rognan, D., et al., Modeling the interactions of a peptide-major histocompatibility class I ligand with its receptors. I. Recognition by two alpha beta T cell receptors. J Comput Aided Mol Des, 14(1): 53-69 (2000).   Rongcun, Y. et al. Identification of new HER2/neu-derived peptide epitopes that can elicit specific CTL against autologous and allogeneic carcinomas and melanomas. J Immunol, 163:1037-1044 (1999).   Schlichtholz, B. et al. The immune response to p53 in breast cancer patients is directed against immunodominant epitopes unrelated to the mutational hot spot. Cancer Res, 52:6380-6384 (1992).   Seliger, B., et al. HER-2/neu is expressed in human renal cell carcinoma at heterogeneous levels independently of tumor grading and staging and can be recognized by HLA-A2.1-restricted cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Int J Cancer, 87(3): 349-59 (2000).   Shastri, N., Schwab, S. &amp; Serwold, T. Producing nature&#39;s gene-chips: the generation of peptides for display by MHC class I molecules. Annu Rev Immunol, 20:463-493 (2002).   Slamon, D. J. et al. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med, 344:783-792 (2001).   Steenbakkers, P. G., et al., Localization of MHC class 11/human cartilage glycoprotein-39 complexes in synovia of rheumatoid arthritis patients using complex-specific monoclonal antibodies. J Immunol, 170(11): 5719-27 (2003).   Sugita, Y, Wada, H, Fujita, S, Nakata, T, Sato, S, Noguchi, Y, et al. NY-ESO-1 expression and immunogeneity in malignant and benign breast tumors. Cancer Research, 64:2199-2204 (2004).   Sun, Y. et al. [Result of phase II clinical trial of herceptin in advanced Chinese breast cancer patients]. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi, 25:581-583 (2003).   Theobald, M., et al. Targeting p53 as a general tumor antigen. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 92(26): 11993-7 (1995).   Theobald, M., et al. The sequence alteration associated with a mutational hotspot in p53 protects cells from lysis by cytotoxic T lymphocytes specific for a flanking peptide epitope. J Exp Med, 188(6): 1017-28 (1998).   Townsend, S. E., Goodnow, C. C. &amp; Cornall, R. J. Single epitope multiple staining to detect ultralow frequency B cells. J Immunol Methods, 249:137-146 (2001).   van der Burg, S. H., Visseren, M. J., Brandt, R. M., Kast, W. M. &amp; Melief, C. J. Immunogenicity of peptides bound to MHC class I molecules depends on the MHC-peptide complex stability. J Immunol, 156: 3308-3314 (1996).   Vonderheide R H, Domchek S M, Schultze J L, George D J, Hoar K M, Chen D Y, Stephans K F, Masutomi K, Loda M, Xia Z, Anderson K S, Hahn W C, Nadler L M. Vaccination of cancer patients against telomerase induces functional antitumor CD8+ T lymphocytes. Clin Cancer Res., February 1; 10(3):828-39 (2004).   Wei, M. L. and P. Cresswell. HLA-A2 molecules in an antigen-processing mutant cell contain signal sequence-derived peptides. Nature, 356(6368): 443-6 (1992).   Weidanz, J. A., Nguyen, T., Woodburn, T., Neethling, F. A., Chiriva-Internati, M., Hildebrand, W. H. and Lustgarten, J. Levels of specific peptide-HLA Class I complex predicts tumor cell susceptibility to CTL killing. J Immunol, 177:5088-97 (2006).   Welch, W. R. et al. Antigenic heterogeneity in human ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol, 38:12-16 (1990).   Wilkinson, K. A., Hudecz, F., Vordermeier, H. M., Ivanyi, J. &amp; Wilkinson, R. J. Enhancement of the T cell response to a mycobacterial peptide by conjugation to synthetic branched polypeptide. Eur J Immunol, 29: 2788-2796 (1999).   Wittman, V. P., Woodburn, D., Nguyen, T., Neethling, F. A., Wright, S., and Weidanz, J. A. Antibody Targeting a Class I MHC-Peptide Epitope Promotes Tumor Cell Death. J Immunol, 177:4187-95 (2006).   Yang, S., Linette, G. P., Longerich, S, and Haluska, F G. Antimelanoma activity of CTL generated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells after stimulation with autologous dendritic cells pulsed with melanoma gp100 peptide G209-2M is correlated to TCR avidity. J Immunol, 169:531-539 (2002).   Yu, Z., et al. The use of transgenic mice to generate high affinity p53 specific cytolytic T cells. J Surg Res, 69(2): 337-43 (1997).   Yu, Y. Y., Netuschil, N., Lybarger, L., Connolly, J. M. &amp; Hansen, T. H. Cutting edge: single-chain trimers of MHC class I molecules form stable structures that potently stimulate antigen-specific T cells and B cells. Immunol, 168: 3145-3149 (2002).