Patent Publication Number: US-2009237508-A1

Title: Method and apparatus for providing immersive surveillance

Description:
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS 
     This application claims benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/339,726, filed Nov. 2, 2001 which is herein incorporated by reference. 
    
    
     GOVERNMENT RIGHTS IN THIS INVENTION 
     This invention was made with U.S. government support under contract number F30602-00-C-0143. The U.S. government has certain rights in this invention. 
    
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     1. Field of the Invention 
     The present invention generally relates to surveillance systems and, more particularly, relates to a method and apparatus for providing immersive surveillance. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     The objective of a surveillance or visualization display is typically to allow a user to monitor or observe a scene with full awareness of the situation within the scene. Typical surveillance or visualization systems present video to a user from more than one camera on a single display. Such a display allows the user to observe different parts of the scene, or to observe the same part of the scene from different viewpoints. A typical surveillance display, for example, has 16 videos of a scene shown in a 4 by 4 grid on a monitor. Each video is usually labeled by a fixed textual annotation displayed under the video segment to identify the image. For example, the text “lobby” or “front entrance” may be shown. If an event deserving attention is observed in one particular video, then the label can be used to locate the activity in the scene. 
     This approach for surveillance and visualization has been used widely for many years. However, there are some fundamental problems with this approach. 
     First, if an event deserving attention occurs in one particular video, then the user does not know how the activity relates to other locations in the scene without referring to or remembering a map or 3D model of the scene. For example, if activity is observed near “elevator 1” and the user knows that a guard is currently at “stairwell 5”, then without a map or 3D model, the user will not know if the guard is very close or very far from the activity in order to intervene. The process of referring to a map or 3D model either on paper or on a computer is typically time-consuming and error-prone since a human is involved in the association of the camera view to the map or model. The process of remembering a map or 3D model is also error-prone, and typically impossible when large numbers of cameras are used or if the site is large. 
     Second, if an event deserving attention occurs in a video and then the activity moves out of the field of view of the video in one particular direction, then there are only two ways that the user can predict the new location of the activity. First, the user can remember the orientation (pointing direction) of the camera with respect to a fixed coordinate system (for example, the compass directions). Second, the user can recognize landmarks in the video and can use the landmarks to determine the approximate orientation of the camera with respect to a fixed coordinate system by remembering or referring to a map or 3D model of the scene. These two methods of predicting the new location of activity are error-prone, since typically the views from cameras are shown with respect to many different arbitrary coordinate systems that vary widely from camera to camera depending on how each camera was mounted during installation. As more cameras are added to the system, the more difficult it is for the user to remember their orientations or to recognize the landmarks in the scene. In addition, some parts of the scenes may contain no distinguishing landmarks at all. 
     Third, as more videos are displayed on a screen, then the resolution of each video has to be reduced in order to fit them into a display. This makes it difficult to observe the details of any event deserving attention in the video. The current solution to this problem is either to have an additional display that shows one selected video at high resolution, or to switch a single display between the view showing multiple reduced resolution videos and a view showing a single video at high resolution. However, the problem with this approach is that the user will miss any activity that may be occurring in other videos while they are focusing on the single high-resolution video. 
     Therefore, there is a need in the art for a method and apparatus for providing an immersive surveillance system that provides a user with a three-dimensional contextual view of a scene. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention is a method and apparatus for providing immersive surveillance wherein a remote user may monitor a scene using a variety of imagery sources that are rendered upon a three-dimensional model to provide a three-dimensional contextual view of the scene. The surveillance system comprises a plurality of cameras supplying video and an image processor for applying the videos to a three dimensional (3D) model of the scene. The rendered model/video combination provides a 3D contextual view of the scene in which the user can be immersed. Using a view selector, the user may dynamically select a specific view to be displayed from the contextual model, perform a virtual walk through of the scene, identify moving objects and select the best view of those moving objects, and so on. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       So that the manner in which the above recited features of the present invention are attained and can be understood in detail, a more particular description of the invention, briefly summarized above, may be had by reference to the embodiments thereof which are illustrated in the appended drawings. 
       It is to be noted, however, that the appended drawings illustrate only typical embodiments of this invention and are therefore not to be considered limiting of its scope, for the invention may admit to other equally effective embodiments. 
         FIG. 1  depicts a high level block diagram of the present invention; 
         FIG. 2  depicts a detailed block diagram of the surveillance system in accordance with the present invention; 
         FIG. 3  depicts a flow chart of the operation of the present invention; 
         FIG. 4  depicts a process for identifying moving objects in accordance with the present invention; 
         FIG. 5  depicts a process for assigning icons to moving objects in accordance with the present invention; 
         FIG. 6  depicts a “birds eye” view of an illustrative hallway structure within a scene that can be monitored with the present invention; 
         FIG. 7  depicts examples of a display used for modeling moving objects within the hallway structure of  FIG. 6 ; 
         FIG. 8  depicts a display of a synthetic view of a moving object identified by the present invention; 
         FIG. 9  depicts a block diagram of an alternative embodiment of the invention; 
         FIG. 10  depicts a flow diagram of a method of the embodiment of  FIG. 9 ; and 
         FIG. 11A ,  11 B,  11 C and  11 D depicts an example of the operation of the embodiment of  FIG. 9 . 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
       FIG. 1  depicts a block diagram of a surveillance system  102  as applied to monitor activity in a simple hallway scene  100 . The hallway scene  100  comprises a first hallway  104  and a second hallway  106  that intersect and form a “T” shape. The hallway structure  100  is monitored by four cameras  108 ,  110 ,  112  and  114 . These cameras are coupled to an image processor  116 . The image processor processes the imagery from the cameras  108 ,  110 ,  112  and  114  to produce an image for display on an image display  118  (e.g., a video monitor). The particular view rendered from the various cameras is selectable using view selector  120 . Generally, a user, e.g., a security guard  122 , may be located either at the facility containing the scene  100  or may be remotely located from the scene  100 . As shall be described below, the scene is modeled as a three-dimensional computer model and the imagery from the cameras  108 ,  110 ,  112 ,  114  is overlaid upon the model to provide a three-dimensional contextual view of the hallway scene  100  to the security guard  122 . The security guard, by manipulating the view selector, can take a virtual tour of the scene, can identify and isolate moving objects within the scene, can view the scene from either the camera locations or from locations between the cameras from a virtual viewpoint, can view the scene from a “bird&#39;s eye” view to identify moving objects or other locations to be viewed within the scene. 
       FIG. 6  depicts a “bird&#39;s eye” view of the scene  100  of  FIG. 1 . The cameras are place such that the scene, and especially the hallway junction, is covered by multiple views of the cameras. Each camera  108 ,  110 ,  112  and  114  has a particular viewing area respectively  602 ,  604 ,  606  and  608 . As shall be discussed below, the three-dimensional model of the structure  100  will be “draped” with the imagery collected from each of the cameras  108 ,  110 ,  112  and  114  such that the security guard will view a contextual model of the scene that immerses the security guard in the surveillance situation. The cameras  108 ,  110 ,  112 ,  114  are generally located to cover as much of the scene as possible and slightly overlap between the camera views to enable the model to align the various images with one another. However, the surveillance system of the present invention uses the model of the scene as the coordinate system for aligning all of the imagery of the scene such that overlapping of the camera views is not necessary. 
       FIG. 2  depicts a block diagram of the surveillance system  102  of the present invention. System  102  comprises a camera assembly  212 , an image processor  116 , a model update source  200 , a view selector  120  and an image display  118 . The camera assembly comprises a plurality of cameras  108 ,  110 ,  112  and  114  coupled to a multiplexer  202 . Any number of cameras may be used and coupled to a plurality of multiplexers such that the camera assembly  212  may cover entire buildings or regions that are to be surveilled. The multiplexer  202  combines the video streams from the, for example, four cameras by splitting the screen into four quadrants and inserting one stream in each quadrant. The stream of video frames is coupled to the image processor  116 . The image processor  116  comprises a frame capture circuit  204 , a frame splitter  206 , an image rendering processor  208  and a 3D model generator  210 . One example of a computer system that can be used as the image processor in accordance with the invention is a dual processor, dual PCI bus, general purpose computer comprising two Pentium 4 processors, an INVIDIA GeForce3 GPU-based video card and four frame capture circuits. 
     The frame capture circuit  204  captures, in a known manner, each frame of video and temporarily stores that information in a memory. The frame splitter  206  is used to demux the video streams so that the video signal from each camera will be processed and stored independently. The 3D model generator  210  and the image rendering processor  208  work together to generate the contextual view of the scene. The 3D model of scene  100  is apriori generated as a wire frame or planar computer model. The model update source  200  provides the 3D model. The view of the model that is to be rendered is identified by the view selector  120 . Typically, the view selector comprises a joy stick, a mouse pointer, and a zoom control such that the security guard may move about the scene as well as zoom in or out on particular objects within the scene. and select various views of the scene, as needed. Once the view of the model is generated, the model is coupled to the image rendering processor where the various video images from the cameras are warped into alignment with the model and rendered upon or draped upon the model. The particular view of the model containing the view is displayed. 
     The coordinate system of the model is used for aligning the video imagery. The video images are closely aligned to the common coordinate system so that the user is easily able to determine how activity in one video relates to activity in other videos without referring to or remembering a map or 3D model of the scene. For instance, if an event deserving attention occurs in a video from one camera view and the activity then moves out of the field of view of that camera in a particular direction, the user can easily predict the new location of the activity within the view of another camera. The user is able to do this without having to remember the orientation of the camera since all video from the cameras is now aligned. For example, if activity moves out of one camera view to the right, then the user can expect to see the activity being recaptured from cameras with views that are displayed to the right of the first view. By using a common coordinate system from the 3D model, multiple, non overlapping portions of the video imagery from the cameras can be aligned to the model. One particular process for rendering imagery to a 3D model that can be used by the surveillance system of the present invention is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/800,550, filed Mar. 7, 2001 (Attorney docket SAR 13825) and incorporated herein by reference. Other processes for rendering images to a 3D model can be used. 
       FIG. 3  depicts a flow diagram  300  of a process  300  by which the surveillance system  102  of the present invention operates. At step  302 , input imagery from the cameras is coupled to the image processor. At step  304 , the user selects a view of the scene and that view information is coupled to step  306  where the model is generated that depicts the model as viewed from the location selected in the view selection step  304 . The overall model of the scene is apriori rendered using various well-known modeling techniques. The model generation step  306  is used to produce the model from the selected viewpoint. To produce a model, an outline of the location or building is encoded in a 3D digital format. The outline model comprises the perimeter of the location or building and also the outline of key areas such as corridors, streets, buildings, and so on. The outline model may also contain simple attributes of the location such as room numbers. The source for the outline model can be from simple measurements recorded manually, followed by encoding into one of the 3D formats known in the art such as Alias/Wavefront OBJ, Open Inventor, VRML and the like. 
     A technician marks the location of each camera on the outline model of the scene. The technician performs this process using information from the surrounding regions such as a room number, building shape or other distinguishing landmarks and by corresponding the camera locations manually to the outline model. The technician also defines the camera parameters such as height and orientation. The camera orientation comprise the pan, tilt and roll of the cameras with respect to a global coordinate system defined by the scene. There are many methods known in the art for measuring the pan, tilt and roll of a camera, any of which are useful in building the model of the scene. The result of the process for defining the camera parameters is a set of parameters that define location, height, pan, tilt and roll for each camera with respect to a global outline model of the scene. 
     Subsequently, the planar surfaces of the outline model of the scene are then modeled using well known 3D shape modeling techniques. For example, one method for recovering polygons within a scene is for the installation technician to perform simple model building using captured imagery and knowledge of the 3D shape of the scene. The technician loads a single image from each camera view into a display. The technician then selects a set of points in the image that define the boundaries of a single planar surface in the scene, such as a wall. The surface need not be entirely planar, objects that are attached to the surface such as heaters may be defined as belonging to a single plane. The technician then records whether the plane is approximately vertical or horizontal, or any other predetermined orientation. The technician then repeats the process for other planar surfaces in the scene and for each camera view. In addition, the technician records the floor upon which each camera is located in a multi-floor building. The result of the process is a set of points in the coordinate system of the images, a set of flags defining the orientation of the surfaces in 3D and a set of numbers defining the floor upon which each camera is located. 
     Other modeling techniques may be used to develop a full 3D model of the scene. Additionally texture may be mapped onto the 3D model such that the walls and floors and other objects within the scene that are not draped with video during the rendering process have apparent texture to the user. 
     At step  308 , the model from the selected viewpoint and the input imagery are combined to render a view of the scene as directed by the security guard. In the example described herein, it is assumed that the camera locations are static, but from the following description it will be clear that the cameras may pan and tilt dynamically and the imagery updated dynamically to reflect the pan and tilt motion. The rendered view of the scene does not, at this point, contain moving objects. The rendering process is performed as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/800,550, filed Mar. 7, 2001 (Attorney Docket No. SAR 13825) or a similar rendering process. In summary, the video from each camera is aligned to the model and warped into position. The warped video from each camera is applied to the model and merged to form the contextual view of the scene. In this manner, the hallway structure of scene  100  will contain walls represented with video imagery from the cameras. The user is presented with a “real” 3D view of the scene  100 . 
     Moving objects within the scene are processed at step  310 . Where the input imagery is processed to identify moving objects and then produce icons that are inserted into the rendered view such that the security guard may identify movement within the scene. The process for identifying movement is described with respect to  FIG. 4  and the process for generating icons to represent the motion is described with respect to  FIG. 5  below. At step  314 , the icons are inserted into the rendered imagery. At step  316 , the process  300  queries whether the rendered imagery should be stored. If the query at step  316  is answered affirmatively, the imagery is stored either on video tape or in digital memory at step  318 . Such storage allows the model and its constituent video to be “rewound” and “replayed” by the security guard, if desired. At step  320 , a rendered image and icons are displayed for the security guard. At step  322 , the process  300  queries whether a new view is selected by the security guard. If a new view is not selected, the process returns to step  302  and processes more of the video streams from the cameras. If a new view has been selected, then the process returns to both steps  302  and  304  to generate a new model of the new view as well as apply the new imagery to the new view of the model. 
     If the cameras used to produce the video have pan/tilt/zoom (PTZ) features, this camera motion must be accommodated when rendering views of a scene. If the PTZ orientation of a camera is captured by encoders on the camera, the system can read this information directly from the camera. Then, the system accesses a look-up table to find the pose of the camera within the geometry of the scene given the PTZ values. The pose is used to render a display. 
     To create the pose look-up table, a calibration process must be performed. The camera is pointed at a particular location in the scene and a user identifies (typically by pointing and clicking a mouse pointer) points in the image and corresponding points in the 3D model. The system then computes the rotation portion of the pose for that particular set of PTZ values. This procedure is repeated for several images having the camera pointed in various directions. The captured PTZ values and the computed pose for each direction are stored in the pose look-up table. An interpolation algorithm then computes PTZ and pose values between the measured values to fully populate the pose look-up table. 
     If the foregoing encoder-based approach is not accurate enough to enable alignment of the video and the model, or encoders are not available to produce camera PTZ values, then image information can be used to match against the model and achieve alignment without PTZ values or with inaccurate PTZ values. 
     One procedure aligns the video directly with the 3D model. This procedure is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/800,550, filed Mar. 7, 2001 (Attorney Docket No. SAR 13825). This alignment procedure can be augmented with the teachings of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/075,462, filed May 8, 1998 (Attorney Docket No. SAR 12426) to utilize texture maps and image filtering to improve image alignment when scene illumination varies. 
     A second technique aligns the video to a spherical image mosaic that itself has been aligned (possibly manually) to the 3D model. This is a robust technique because image-to-image alignment is performed rather than image-to-model alignment. Spherical image mosaics are a priori produced in a conventional manner for each camera having PTZ features. These mosaics are aligned to the 3D model and stored. Subsequent images from the cameras are aligned to the mosaics to provide accurate alignment of current images to the 3D model. To ensure alignment errors will not occur during changes in scene illumination, either multiple mosaics for each camera can be produced at various light levels or techniques disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/075,462, filed May 8, 1998 (Attorney Docket No. SAR 12426), incorporated herein by reference, can be used to align images over broad variations in illumination. 
       FIG. 4  depicts a process  401  (performed at step  310  of  FIG. 3 ) for identifying moving objects within the scene. At step  400 , the image sequence is input to the process. The image sequence is processed by both a two-dimensional (2D) module  418  and a three-dimensional (3D) module  420 . The 2D module  418  separates foreground objects from the static background scene. The 3D module  420  performs depth and shape recovery to enable the process  401  to identify the form of object that is moving in the scene. At step  402 , the static background information (a reference image) within the scene is extracted from the image sequence using a well known filtering technique that remove foreground motion from a video sequence. One such method is disclosed in European Patent Publication Number EP 1045591. The reference image is then subtracted from the original image sequence at step  404  to produce a two dimensional (2D) object silhouette for each moving object in the scene. All moving objects will be appear as a silhouette in step  406 . 
     To accurately identify objects moving in a 3D scene, three dimensional information is necessary to identify and isolate moving objects versus objects that apparently move because of camera movement, shadows, and the like. Such three dimensional processing is performed in the 3D module comprising steps  408 ,  410 ,  412  and  414 . At step  408 , depth information is computed from the image sequence. At step  410 , background depth information is computed or determined and, at step  412 , the background depth information is subtracted from the depth information gleaned from the image sequence to produce foreground object depth information only. The foreground depth information is combined with the object silhouette information at step  414  to produce three dimensional object silhouettes at step  416 . By combining the 2D and 3D object silhouette information, foreground objects that apparently moved due to camera movement or shadows are now identifiable as non-moving objects. As such, the object silhouettes produced at step  416  accurately depict the foreground objects that are moving within a scene. 
     Once the foreground objects have been segmented and their depth and shapes have been recovered, then it is possible to model these objects in three dimensions. If each object silhouette is rendered into a three dimensional model then when the model is inserted as an icon into the rendered imagery of the scene that foreground object can be visualized from different viewpoints and appear geometrically correct within the scene. 
       FIG. 5  depicts a flow diagram of a process  501  (performed at step  312  of  FIG. 3 ) for generating icons that are three dimensional models of moving objects within a scene. At step  500 , the 2D and/or 3D object silhouettes from process  401  of  FIG. 4  are input into the process  501 . The object silhouettes generally comprise both depth and/or shape information from the depth estimation module as well as textural information such as color and brightness. For example, significant textural discontinuities that are also close to the significant depth discontinuities can be classified to be part of the outline or silhouette of the object. At step  502 , the object silhouette is classified. The purpose of this classification step is to identify the model type that should be fit to the foreground object. Classification can be performed by analyzing attributes of the object. Examples of attributes include size and shape of the silhouette. An example of a method that can recover the attributes of an object is a moment analysis. The first and second order moments computed on the foreground object can be used to determine whether or not an object is slender. A slender object may be classified as a human, and non-slender object may be classified as another type of object such as a vehicle. Depending on the classification, different models for the object can be invoked. For example, at step  504 , a human may be modeled by a set of spheres and, at step  506 , a vehicle can be modeled as a box. Other object would be modeled as various types in steps  508  and  510 . These icons (object models) are inserted into the rendered imagery as described above. 
       FIG. 7  depicts an illustrative display screen that may be viewed by a security guard. The view screen  700  depicts a “birds eye” view of the monitored scene in region  710  and depicts, in region  712  four of the live camera views from each of the four cameras  108 ,  110 ,  112  and  114 . Within region  710  is a rendering of the hallway structure  100  of  FIG. 1  containing the moving objects that were identified by the moving object detection process  401  and rendered as icons by the moving object icon generator  501 . The icons are  702 ,  704  and  706  are generally shown as different color “dots” depending on the camera that is capturing the movement of the object. For example, icon  702  may be shown in red and the icon  716  for the camera (camera  110 ) that is capturing that movement would also be shown in red. Similarly, camera icon  714  may be shown in blue and object  704  would also be in blue. To enhance the identity and movement of the object, the trailing shadow  708  may be used to show prior positions of the moving object as it moves through the scene. Object icon  706  contains shadow trail  708  to show movement of the object along hallway  104 . As such, the security guard may receive additional information from erratic or abnormal movement of an object through a scene. Upon identifying an object that the security guard desires to view more closely the security guard may place the mouse pointer upon the object and click or double click to select that object. After selection, the surveillance system generates a view of that object from either a particular camera location or a synthetic camera location that is rendered from the multiple cameras viewing a scene. 
       FIG. 8  depicts a synthetic view from a location in hallway  106  of object  702 . This synthetic view can be manipulated using a zoom control to zoom in/out on the object, or use a joy stick to move within the scene to get a better view of the object and its destination. Additionally, the security guard can always select a live view of the scene as taken from a camera that is currently imaging the object. The rendered view  702  shows a sphere based model of a person walking along the hallway  106 . As the camera angle is panned or tilted for the synthetic view generated from a different location, the three dimensional spherical model will render a person walking down the hallway. The walls and floors of the rendered image are textured from the video that is produced by the cameras such that the synthetic view is as accurate as an actual camera view of the scene. The identification of the moving object and then rendering a specific image of a portion of the entire scene with that object within the scene is known as a “flashlight mode” of operation. The process used for rendering flashlight mode imagery is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/800,550, filed Mar. 7, 2001. 
     The present system involves substantial flexibility in the view point and video rendering of a scene. For example, the view selector may include specific go to points for the operator to check on a regular basis. The view may contain camera icons so that the security guard may know exactly what views are available from the live feeds. A top view of the motion as depicted in  FIG. 7  is available. The security guard may fly through the image imagery to take a virtual walk through of the scene from a remote location and, at any time, full resolution video is available from the feeds of each of the cameras such that the security guard may elect a full resolution view of the imagery in the scene. 
     Furthermore, the imagery may be annotated when the mouse pointer is pointed to certain locations within a scene to show the location information regarding that scene or object identification. For example, if a person has entered through a secure check point that person&#39;s name and ID number may appear on the screen when that person&#39;s icon is identified within the scene. As such, the person could be tracked as they moved through a secure area. Alternatively, a person could be observed in a particular location, the user could request identification, and the full resolution video could be sampled by a face recognition system to identify the person. An annotation of the person&#39;s identification could then appear on the three dimensional contextual view of the scene. The user could then track the person as they moved through the facility. If the person could not be identified, security personnel could be dispatched to intercept the unidentified person. 
     Another embodiment of the present invention is depicted in  FIG. 9  where an implicit 3D model is used to provide an intuitive map that interconnects image sequences. The system  900  comprises a plurality of video cameras, or other sources of imagery,  902 ,  904 ,  906  and  908  that produce a plurality of video sequences. The video sequences are coupled to an image processor  912  that contains an implicit 3D model  918 . The model  918  can be created using the model update source  914 . A view selector  910  is coupled to the image processor  912 . The view selector  910  is manipulated by a user such that views of the imagery taken by the cameras  902 ,  904 ,  906  and  908  are displayed on the image display  916 . 
     The model update source  914  is used to create an implicit 3D model in an apriori manner by a user. In essence, the implicit 3D model creates a map that interconnects the views of the various cameras such that, as an object moves through a scene that is imaged by the cameras, a simple selection of a view using a mouse pointer on the screen will automatically display the best view of the selected image area. 
     The map (the implicit model) identifies interconnections between video sequences. In one embodiment, the map is a look-up table that comprises, for each video sequence, a transition region and a video sequence associated with the transition region. The transition region may be a single pixel or a region of pixels. Each video sequence is given a unique identification number. The unique identification numbers may be associated with one or more transition regions. Once the relationship is made, the user may select a transition region in a displayed video sequence and the video sequence associated with the region will be displayed. 
     In one example, each sequence has a transition region at 0, 90, 180 and 270 degrees with the coordinate system of an image. These regions are located at the top, bottom, right and left edges of an image. Other locations may be used. Using the four locations, a user can select a transition region into which an object moves such that a more appropriate view of the object is displayed. 
     If the cameras are in fixed locations, the implicit map only needs to be created once. To produce the map, the user needs to have knowledge of only the overlaps of the video produced by the cameras then the map can be created having the user identify which cameras overlap with each other camera or closely overlap each other. Note that there does not need to be an explicit overlap between the images. The user need only identify which camera view is desired to be shown next if a target happens to be moving in a particular direction. For each camera that overlaps or nearly overlaps, a user draws a rectangle or other shaped region of interest in the image and keys in which camera should be displayed if an object is moving in a particular direction within that region. 
       FIG. 11D  shows an example scene having three cameras  1104 ,  1106  and  1108 . The coordinate system for each image is shown at scale  1150 . Each camera covers a particular region  1114 ,  1112  and  1110  that is imaged by each of the cameras. Table 1 identifies the implicit three dimensional model (map) for the camera arrangement in  FIG. 11D . 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                 TABLE 1 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Camera 1 
                 Camera 2 
                 Camera 3 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
                 2, 270° 
                 1, 90° 
                 2, 0° 
               
               
                   
                   
                 3, 0° 
                 2, 180° 
               
               
                   
                   
                 3, 180° 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     In the first column, camera  1  has only one available transition to camera  2  when an object moves in the region at 270 degrees. Camera  2  transitions to camera  1  at 90 degrees, camera  3  at 0 degrees and camera  3  also 180 degrees and, lastly, camera  3  transitions to camera  2  at 0 degrees and again at camera  2  at 180 degrees. 
       FIG. 11A ,  11 B and  11 C depict the three views from cameras  1104 ,  1106  and  1108  as an object follows path  1102  shown in  FIG. 11D . The object begins at position  1116  and transitions from right to left in  FIG. 11A  in the view of camera  1104 . When the object reaches the left hand side into region  1118 , the cursor  1120  may be placed on the object or in the region  1118  to select a new view. At that point, the transitions as defined in table  1  will identify camera  2  at the 270 degree region as the next camera to use to best view the object.  FIG. 11B  shows the object moving in the view of camera  2  from left to the 0 degree region  1128 . As the object moves into region  1128 , cursor  1120  may be placed upon the region and selected, the table is then used again to identify the next view of the scene to best image the moving object. The third camera  1108  is now selected as the object begins at position  1130  and moves to position  1132 . The object then moves from position  1130  to position  1132 . The object then transitions out of the scene. In this manner an implicit 3D model can easily be created to enable a user to quickly follow a moving object through the scene through any number of cameras that have been used to establish the implicit 3 dimensional model. 
       FIG. 10  is a method of the alternative embodiment of the invention. The method  1000  begins at step  1002  with an input of a plurality of video sequences from the cameras. At step  1004 , the video sequences are registered to an implicit relationship model as defined by the user selecting regions to identify cameras to which to transition. At step  1010 , a view of the scene is selected using an input device such as a mouse, track pad, track ball and the like. At step  1006 , a sequence is selected for display as identified in step  1010 , based on the placement of the cursor as discussed above. The selected video sequence is then displayed at step  1008 . This system provides and intuitive and simple manner for a user to follow an object through a scene. An operator can easily navigate around the scene by placing the cursor in a transition region within a particular video frame and selecting that region. If the operator wishes to see around a building corner, the operator can select the region of the corner and the best view around the corner would be displayed. 
     In the foregoing embodiments of the invention, the view selector was described as being manipulated by a user to select a view of the scene. However, the view selector may be automated. For example, when motion is detected in the scene (or a particular type of motion is detected), the view selector may automatically select a view that best displays the region of the scene containing the motion. Those skilled in the art will understand that many other criteria can be used to automate view selection. 
     While foregoing is directed to the preferred embodiment of the present invention, other and further embodiments of the invention may be devised without departing from the basic scope thereof, and the scope thereof is determined by the claims that follow.