Patent Publication Number: US-2021169808-A1

Title: Tablet Dosage Form For Buccal Absorption Of Active Ingredients

Description:
FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention relates to a tablet dosage form for buccal absorption of active ingredients. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Oral tablets for delivery of active pharmaceutical ingredients for buccal absorption are well-known in the art. A challenge in relation to such tablets is that many of such tablets are less than attractive to the user of the tablet. This challenge is significant as users are more and more focused on taste or oral displeasure and it affects the effectiveness and the options available for such oral tablets. This challenge is in particular relevant in relation to oral tablets designed for delivery of active pharmaceuticals. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention relates to a tablet dosage form for buccal absorption of active ingredients comprising a population of particles and an active ingredient to be released in the oral cavity for absorption through the oral mucosa, the population of particles comprising directly compressible (DC) and non-directly compressible (non-DC) sugar alcohol particles, the non-DC particles providing the tablet with a plurality of discrete non-DC areas. 
     According to the present invention, non-DC sugar alcohol is applied for the purpose of releasing active agent in the oral cavity of a user. A benefit of non-DC sugar alcohol is beside its attractive mouthfeel compared to DC-sugar alcohols, that the active ingredients may be made fast available for absorption in the oral cavity. 
     One advantage of the present invention may be that the active ingredient is made available for buccal uptake very fast. The plurality of discrete non-DC areas may result in induced saliva generation, which helps to disintegrate and dissolve the sugar alcohol-based matrix of the tablet, while at the same time providing a chewable structure which easily breaks down when masticated. This facilitates the immediate release of active ingredients upon mastication, such that e.g. a large part of the active ingredients may be released within the first 20 seconds from onset of mastication, or faster. The immediate release of active ingredients facilitates fast availability for buccal absorption of the active ingredients, which is further increased by the induced salivation generation causing distribution of the released active ingredients over a large part of the oral mucosa for buccal absorption over the oral mucosa. 
     As a means for increasing the absorption, the tablet dosage form may be supplemented with e.g. enhancers such as pH controlling agents to increase the absorption through mucosa. A further way of increasing the absorption in the present context is to apply e.g. a biofilm or an immobilizer to make the active ingredient stick to the mucosa for subsequent absorption instead of being swallowed. 
     A further means for increasing the absorption may be inclusion of gum base in the tablet dosage form, thereby delaying the release from the tablet dosage form. 
     Applicable active ingredients for buccal absorption within the scope of the invention may e.g. include Aripiprazole, fentanyl, caffeine, amphetamine, loratadine, fexofenadine, donepezil, diphenhydramine, paracetamol, desloratadine, loratadine, desmopressin, zolpidem, etizolam, clozapine, N-acetylcysteine, acetaminophen, baclofen, clonazepam, lamotrigine, rizatriptan, meloxicam, alprazolam, desmopressin, hyoscyamine, ibuprofen, prednisolone, carbidopa/levodopa, famotidine, lansoprazole, cisapride, metoclopramide, mirtazapine, risperidone, tramadol, asenapine, vardenafil, testosterone, Buprenorphine/Naloxone, phentermine, tramadol, diphenhydramine, domperidone, selegiline, ondansetron, zolmitriptan, olanzapine, and cetirizine. 
     In the present context, the non-DC sugar alcohol particles are understood and defined by the skilled person with reference to their typical commercial trade grade. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the non-DC sugar alcohol particles have not been granulated prior to tableting. 
     Thus, the non-DC sugar alcohol particles are provided as non-granulated particles. 
     These are typically available in a non-DC form of the relevant sugar alcohol as particles which have not been preprocessed by granulation with other sugar alcohols or binders for the purpose of obtaining so-called direct compressible particles (DC) on the basis of sugar alcohol particles which are by themselves not suitable for direct compression. Such non-DC particles of sugar alcohol may typically consist of the sugar alcohol. Therefore, non-DC sugar alcohol particles may typically be particles consisting of sugar alcohol, which is non-directly compressible in its pure form. Examples of sugar alcohols which are non-directly compressible when provided as particles consisting of the sugar alcohol in question include erythritol, xylitol, maltitol, mannitol, lactitol, isomalt, etc. 
     Therefore, preferred non-DC grades of sugar alcohol may include pure sugar alcohol particles. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is selected from atenolol, baclofen, caffeine, carvedilol, chlorpheniramine, chlorpheniramine maleate, fluticasone propionate, maleate, desmopressin, diltiazem hydrochloride, doxylamine succinate, mycostatin, nicotine, nifedipine, nitroglycerin, omeprazole, ondansetron, oxymetazoline HCl, oxytocin, phenylephrine, piroxicam, prednisone, propranolol, salbutamol sulphate, scopoloamine butyl hydroxide, sumatriptan, triamcinolonacetonid, and any combination thereof. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention at least 10% by weight of the active ingredient is absorbed through the oral mucosa. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention at least 25% by weight of the active ingredient is absorbed through the oral mucosa. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention at least 50% by weight of the active ingredient is absorbed through the oral mucosa. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet is designed to deliver a part of the active ingredient to the gastrointestinal tract as part of saliva generated upon mastication of the tablet. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is an analgesic. 
     Examples of analgesics include e.g. ibuprofen, paracetamol (acetaminophen), ketoprofen, aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), and naproxen. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is an anesthetic. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is an anti-inflammation agent. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is a disinfectant. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is a stimulant. 
     Examples of active ingredients include e.g. caffeine and nicotine. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is an antihistamine. 
     Examples of antihistamines include e.g. doxylamine succinate and chlorpheniramine maleate. 
     Antihistamines are drugs to treat allergic rhinitis and other allergies. Antihistamines can give release to a person with nasal congestion, sneezing or hives caused by e.g. pollen, dust mites or animal allergy. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is a hormone. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is melatonin. 
     Hormones include synthetic hormones. Examples of hormones include e.g. fluticasone propionate, desmopressin, and oxytocin. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is a beta blocker. 
     Examples of beta blockers include e.g. carvedilol and propranolol. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is a triptan. 
     Examples of triptans include e.g. sumatriptan. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is a xerostomia mitigation agent, such as a xerostomia mitigation agent for cancer patients. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is an antibiotic. 
     Examples of antibiotics include e.g. ampicillin, erythromycin, tetracycline, clarithromycin, penicillin, and metronidazole. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is an allergy medication for buccal absorption. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment is that immediate action may be obtained by bypassing the digestive system thereby bypassing the liver. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is a migraine treatment agent. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is an enzyme. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is a probiotic ingredient. 
     One advantage of enzymes may be that digestion may be accelerated and/or that intestinal balance is restored or improved. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is a gastrointestinal medication. 
     In this context a gastrointestinal medication is understood as an active ingredient acting in the gastrointestinal tract. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is an opioid. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet is a medical device for alleviating or treating dysphagia by inducing saliva generation. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is nicotine. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is caffeine. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is chlorpheniramine. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is oxytocin. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is desmopressin. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is prednisone. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is diphenhydramine. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is loratadine. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is benzydaminhydrochlorid. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet comprises an effervescence agent for promoting faster buccal absorption of the active ingredient. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is penicillin. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet is designed to release at least 50% by weight of the active ingredient within 20 seconds from onset of mastication. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet is designed to provide fast onset action of the active ingredient. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet further comprises a saliva production inhibiting agent for controlling saliva production. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet is designed to release the active ingredient in the oral cavity for absorption through the oral mucosa of a part of the active ingredient, wherein the tablet is designed to deliver a part of the active ingredient to the throat as part of saliva generated upon mastication of the tablet, and wherein the tablet is designed to deliver a part of the active ingredient to the gastrointestinal tract. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet comprises means for sustained release. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is at least partly encapsulated. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is a prodrug. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the part of the active ingredient absorbed through the oral mucosa results in fast onset action of the active ingredient. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the part of the active ingredient delivered to the gastrointestinal tract results in sustained action of the active ingredient. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet is designed to release the active ingredient in the oral cavity for absorption through the oral mucosa of a part of the active ingredient, and wherein the tablet is designed to deliver another part of the active ingredient to the throat as part of saliva generated upon mastication of the tablet. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet is designed to release the active ingredient in the oral cavity for absorption through the oral mucosa of a part of the active ingredient, and wherein the tablet is designed to deliver another part of the active ingredient to the gastrointestinal tract as part of saliva generated upon mastication of the tablet. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the part of the active ingredient absorbed through the oral mucosa results in fast onset action of the active ingredient. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the part of the active ingredient delivered to the gastrointestinal tract results in sustained action of the active ingredient. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is an active pharmaceutical ingredient. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention said population of particles is tableted into a first module and combined with a second population of particles that is tableted into a second module. 
     Thus, a synergy between utilization of non-DC sugar alcohol particles as a disintegration promoter due to the lower mechanical strength and also as a salivation promoter in combination with a second module, which can provide additional mechanical strength, thereby acting as a carrier module. This is especially advantageous when the second population of particles contributes to an attractive mouthfeel by a high content of DC sugar alcohols, which also provides mechanical strength to the tablet. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that the second module may have a higher mechanical strength, e.g. by means of a different composition comprising e.g. a very large amount of direct compressible ingredients, such as DC sugar alcohols. 
     A further advantage of the above embodiment may be that the second module may have a higher loading capacity for e.g. active ingredients, partly due to the higher obtainable mechanical strength achievable by large amounts of direct compressible ingredients, such as DC sugar alcohols. 
     Thus, in the above embodiment said population of particles is tableted into a first module, and wherein the tablet further comprises a second population of particles that is tableted into a second module. The first module may be tableted before the second module, or vice versa. In some embodiments, the tablet may comprise one or more further modules. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the oral tablet comprises at least two modules. A tablet comprising two or more modules will thus have module sizes which each are comparable to the volume of the complete tablet. Comparable in the present context means that the modules are not understood as small particles and a module should at least be greater than 1/20 of the complete tablet volume, preferably greater than 1/10 of the complete tablet volume. 
     The module may typically be gathered from a plurality of compressed particles and have a weight which is greater than 0.2 gram and less than 10 grams. 
     In an embodiment of the invention a module is defined as a plurality of particles being compressed together to form a gathered module of particles. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the oral tablet comprises a plurality of oral tablet modules. In the present context the application of e.g. two modules are in particular advantageous as the use of non-DC sugar alcohols by nature may result in a more fragile tablet or at least the module in which the non-DC sugar alcohols are. In other words, non-DC sugar alcohols may be present primarily in one module thereby optimizing the desired salivation and sensory experience from the module and the tablet as such whereas another module may serve as a support ensuring that the desired stability and friability of the complete tablet is obtained. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the plurality of modules are slice-like layers. The term “slice-like” layer is a plain but very precise way of to the skilled person how a module may be provided, as such a layer is a standard structure obtained through conventional tableting procedures. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the tablet has two modules. Optionally, a coating may be applied around the two modules to form the final tablet. 
     An advantage of using two modules is described above, but it should also be noted that this effect may also be obtained when applying layers of very different nature. Such application may e.g. include the use of a gum module and a non-gum module, where the non-gum modules are containing the non-DC sugar alcohol particles. In this way, the non-gum layer may release the advantageous non-DC sugar alcohols and the gum layer may both stabilize the tablet as described above but also interact with the non-DC sugar alcohols during in particular the initial release for establishment of a very pleasant an impressing initial chew phase. This includes an increased saliva and moisture experience. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is included in the population of particles. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is included in the second population of particles. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention the active pharmaceutical ingredient is included in the population of particles. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention the active pharmaceutical ingredient is included in the second population of particles. 
     In an embodiment of the invention said population of particles is tableted into a first module and combined with a second population of particles that is tableted into a second module, where the second population of particles is different from the first population of particles. 
     In an embodiment of the invention said population of particles is tableted into a first module and combined with a second population of particles that is tableted into a second module, and wherein the second module is different in composition than the first module. 
     In an embodiment of the invention said population of particles is tableted into a first module and combined with a second population of particles that is tableted into a second module, where the second population of particles is different from the first population of particles, where the second population of particles is free of non-DC sugar alcohols. 
     In an embodiment of the invention said population of particles is tableted into a first module and combined with a second population of particles that is tableted into a second module, and wherein the second module does not comprise non-DC sugar alcohol particles. 
     In one embodiment, the second population of particles comprises a large amount of DC sugar alcohols, such as larger amounts than the first population of particles. For example, the second population of particles may comprise at least at least 30% by weight of DC sugar alcohols, such as 50% by weight of DC sugar alcohols, such as at least 70% by weight of sugar alcohols. In an example embodiment, the second population of particles may comprise between 50 and 99.9% by weight of sugar alcohols, such as between 70 and 99% by weight of sugar alcohols. 
     The amount of DC sugar alcohol may depend on the type and amount of active ingredient applied in the tablet. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the second module is tableted before the first module. 
     In an embodiment of the invention said population of particles is tableted into a first module and combined with a second population of particles that is tableted into a second module, and wherein the second module is a an orally disintegrating tablet (ODT). 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the non-DC areas are evenly distributed in the tablet or at least one module of the tablet. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that the even distribution of the non-DC areas promotes an effective disintegration of the module upon mastication, e.g. due to lower mechanical strength contribution from the non-DC particles, thereby facilitating effective contacting of the resulting mastication fragments formed by the mastication with saliva, again increasing dissolving of the tablet. Also, the even distribution of the non-DC areas promotes a high number of mastication fragments with non-DC sugar alcohols, which again effectively promotes salivation. Thus, a synergy between utilization of non-DC sugar alcohol particles as a disintegration promoter due to the lower mechanical strength and also as a salivation promoter in combination with the even distribution to facilitate effect dispersion of mastication fragments in the oral cavity upon mastication. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention a series of at least 10 of said tablets comprises said non-DC particles in an amount varying with a relative standard deviation (RSD) below 10%. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that uniform product may be obtained having low variation in the amount of non-DC sugar alcohol between tablets. Consequently, the functionality provided by non-DC areas in the tablet may provide low variation between tablets. 
     It is noted that the reference to RSD and a sequence of tablets typically refers to a tablet series of a production line. 
     Furthermore, the RSD of the non-DC sugar alcohol between tablets is a measure of the degree of even distribution of the non-DC areas. Therefore, having an RSD below 10% in a series of at least 10 tablets indicates an even distribution of the non-DC areas. Having evenly distributed non-DC areas facilitates a high salivation since the non-DC areas are effectively distributed in the mouth upon mastication and a resulting disintegration of the tablet. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the amount of non-DC particles between a series of at least 10 of the tablets holds a relative standard deviation (RSD) below 5%. 
     An advantageous method of dosing non-DC sugar alcohols into a composition for a large number of tablets has been established, which facilitates an exact dosing of the non-DC sugar alcohols in a series of tablets. This means that large-scale production of tablets comprising non-DC sugar alcohols is made possible with improved results concerning distribution of the non-DC areas in the tablets and thereby an improved RSD between the tablets of a series. 
     The term RSD as used herein is short for the relative standard deviation, which within this present field is used to indicate the uniformity in content of non-DC sugar alcohols in a series of tablets. An analysis may be carried out on an array of 10 tablets of a series, wherein the content of the non-DC sugar alcohols in question is measured. From these values the RSD may be calculated through the standard formula of RSD=(standard deviation of array X)*100%/(average of array X). 
     In some cases, it may be most convenient to measure RSD of the amount of non-DC sugar alcohol particles indirectly. For example, the RSD of another ingredient may be used as an indicator for the amount of non-DC sugar alcohol particles, as segregation affects the whole composition of the tablet or module in question. 
     When attempting to obtain a high degree of even distribution of the non-DC areas, insufficient mixing may lead to uneven distribution, such as undesirable agglomeration of particles within certain parts of the tablet. Also, even if mixing very thoroughly the ingredients, an undesirable handling of the mixture from the mixing to a tableting machine may lead to segregation. For example, smaller particles may typically segregate to the bottom part of a container, thereby leading to different particle distributions for different tablets. Particularly when the different ingredients have different particle sizes, e.g. if non-DC particles have a larger particle size compared to other ingredients, segregation may lead to different contents of non-DC sugar alcohols in different tablets. Yet, another aspect is that even storing a thoroughly mixed composition for too long may lead to segregation. 
     On the other hand, a measure of having obtained even distribution of non-DC areas in at least one module of the tablet may be that a series of at least 10 of the tablets holds a relative standard deviation (RSD) below 10% with respect to the non-DC sugar alcohol content. 
     In is noted that the term segregation as used herein would be known to the skilled person to mean the separation of a mixture according to similarity, typically size. This may in the present context be a problem when handling a mixture comprising very different sizes of particles, e.g. in a hopper for holding and feeding the composition via a feeding mechanism to a die cavity. 
     Particularly, when including an active ingredient in the tablet, having a low RSD on the content of such active ingredients is highly desirable. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the non-DC areas are homogenously distributed in the tablet or at least one module of the tablet. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that the homogenous distribution of the non-DC areas promotes an effective disintegration of the module upon mastication, e.g. due to lower mechanical strength contribution from the non-DC particles, thereby facilitating effective contacting of the resulting mastication fragments formed by the mastication with saliva, again increasing dissolving of the tablet. Also, the homogenous distribution of the non-DC areas promotes a high number of mastication fragments with non-DC sugar alcohols, which again effectively promotes salivation. Thus, a synergy between utilization of non-DC sugar alcohol particles as a disintegration promoter due to the lower mechanical strength and also as a salivation promoter in combination with the homogenous distribution to facilitate effect dispersion of mastication fragments in the oral cavity upon mastication. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is included in the second population of particles. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the active ingredient is included in the first population of particles. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the active ingredient is present in the first population of particles and in the second population of particles. Thus, in that embodiment the total amount of active ingredient may be obtained by combining the first and the second populations of particles. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the first and the second modules each comprise an amount of the active ingredient, where the amount of active ingredient in the second module is higher than in the first module. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the active ingredient is comprised in the second module. Thus, in that embodiment the first module is free of the active ingredient. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the active ingredient with off-note taste is present in an amount of 0.05 to 12% by weight of the tablet, such as 0.05 to 1.2% by weight, such as 1.2 to 12% by weight. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the active ingredient with off-note taste is present in an amount of 12 to 40% by weight of the tablet. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet further comprising a water-soluble fiber, such as inulin. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet further comprising a plant extract, such as red clover or willow extract. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet comprises a mucoadhesive agent. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that the mucoadhesive agent facilitates the adherence to the oral mucosa. 
     When using an active ingredient for absorption through the oral mucosa, the presence of a mucoadhesive agent facilitates a more effective uptake of the active ingredient by immobilizing the active ingredient on the oral mucosa. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the oral tablet further comprises at least one mucoadhesive ingredient selected from the group consisting of acacia gum, agar, alginic acid or a salt thereof, sodium alginate, carbomer, carboxymethylcellulose or a salt thereof, gelatin, guar gum, hydroxyethyl cellulose, hydroxyethyl methylcellulose, hydroxypropyl cellulose, hypromellose, methylcellulose, pectin, sodium hyaluronate, polycarbophil or a salt thereof, xanthan gum and mixtures thereof. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the mucoadhesive agent comprises one or more selected from pectin, chitosan, alginates such as sodium alginate or potassium alginate, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyacrylic acid (PAA), methyl cellulose (MC), sodium carboxy methylcellulose (SCMC), hydroxy propyl cellulose 
     (HPC), preferably selected from the group consisting of pectin, PVA, PAA, and combinations thereof. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet is a chewable tablet. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, at least 20% by weight of the non-DC sugar alcohol particles have a particle size above 500 μm. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, at least 30% by weight of the non-DC sugar alcohol particles have a particle size above 500 μm. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, at least 40% by weight of the non-DC sugar alcohol particles have a particle size above 500 μm. 
     To the surprise of the inventor, it was seen that larger non-DC sugar alcohol particles were particularly beneficial according to the invention. In particular, larger non-DC sugar alcohol particles were seen to result in induced saliva generation, e.g. a higher total weight of saliva generated compared to smaller non-DC particles. Also, the perceived watering effect may be increased compared to smaller non-DC particles. These findings were not expected by the inventor. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention at least 10% by weight of said population of particles have a particle size below 250 μm, and wherein at least 30% by weight of said population of particles have a particle size above 500 μm. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, at least 10% by weight of the non-DC sugar alcohol particles have a particle size below 250 μm. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, at least 5% by weight of the non-DC sugar alcohol particles have a particle size below 250 μm. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the population of particles have a particle size distribution with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of at least 100 μm. 
     Particularly when having a broad particle size distribution of the population of particles, it was surprising to the inventor that even distribution of the non-DC areas could be accomplished. Typically, when having a broad particle size distribution, such as when having a width from the 10% quantile to the 90% quantile greater than 30% of the mean value, associated compositions are considered vulnerable to segregation. However, according to an embodiment of the invention, the non-DC areas are evenly distributed in at least one module of the tablet and may have amounts of non-DC particles between a series of at least 10 of the tablets holding a relative standard deviation (RSD) below 10%. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the non-DC particles have an average non-DC particle size at least 50 μm larger than an average DC particle size of the DC particles. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the non-DC sugar alcohol particles are selected from non-DC particles of erythritol, maltitol, xylitol, isomalt, lactitol, mannitol, and combinations thereof. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that a desirable induced saliva generation is obtained. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the non-DC sugar alcohol particles consist of sugar alcohols selected from erythritol, maltitol, xylitol, isomalt, lactitol, mannitol, and combinations thereof. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the non-DC sugar alcohol particles are selected from non-DC particles of erythritol, maltitol, xylitol, isomalt, and combinations thereof. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that a desirable induced saliva generation is obtained. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the non-DC sugar alcohol particles are selected from non-DC particles of erythritol, maltitol, xylitol, and combinations thereof. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that a desirable induced saliva generation is obtained. Also, when a cooling sensation is desirable, having non-DC sugar alcohol particles comprising or consisting of erythritol, xylitol, or combinations thereof advantageous. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the non-DC sugar alcohol particles are non-DC erythritol particles. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that a desirable induced saliva generation is obtained, together with a cooling sensation. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the non-DC sugar alcohol particles are non-DC xylitol particles. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that a desirable induced saliva generation is obtained, together with a cooling sensation. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the non-DC sugar alcohol particles are non-DC isomalt particles. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that a desirable induced saliva generation is obtained. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet comprises said non-DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 10% by weight of the tablet. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises said non-DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 20% by weight of the tablet. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises said non-DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 30% by weight of the tablet. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the first module comprises said non-DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 30% by weight of the first module. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the first module comprises said non-DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 40% by weight of the first module. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention said DC sugar alcohol particles comprises sugar alcohols selected from DC particles of sorbitol, erythritol, xylitol, lactitol, maltitol, mannitol, isomalt, and combinations thereof. 
     Sorbitol is an example of a sugar alcohol, which is considered DC grade, when provided as particles consisting of sorbitol, i.e. in its pure form. On the other hand, several other sugar alcohols are considered non-DC grade if providing them as particles consisting of the specific sugar alcohol. Therefore, such non-DC sugar alcohols are conventionally processed into DC grade sugar alcohols, e.g. by granulating them with e.g. a binder. 
     Examples of trade grades of DC sugar alcohols include sorbitol particles provided as e.g. Neosorb® P 300 DC from Roquette, mannitol particles provided as e.g. Pearlitol® 300DC or Pearlitol 200 SD from Roquette, maltitol provided as e.g. SweetPearl® P 300 DC, xylitol provided as e.g. Xylisorb® 200 DC or Xylitab 200 from Dupont. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet comprises said DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 10% by weight of the tablet. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises said DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 20% by weight of the tablet. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises said DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 30% by weight of the tablet. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, said population of particles comprises DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 10% by weight. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the first module comprises DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 10% by weight. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the first module comprises said DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 10% by weight of the first module. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the first module comprises said DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 30% by weight of the first module. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the second module comprises DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 30% by weight of the second module. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the second module comprises DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 50% by weight of the second module. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the second module comprises DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 70% by weight of the second module. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the second module comprises DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of at least 90% by weight of the second module. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the DC sugar alcohol particles in the second module are selected from DC particles of sorbitol, erythritol, xylitol, lactitol, maltitol, mannitol, isomalt, and combinations thereof. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention friability of the tablet is less than 3%, such as less than 2%, such as less than 1.5%, wherein friability is measured according to European Pharmacopoeia 9.1, test method 2.9.7. by using a pharmaceutical friability-tester PTF 10E from Pharma Test. 
     One advantage of the above embodiment may be that a tablet with a relatively high mechanical stability is obtained, while at the same time having the desirable mouthfeel of the invention. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, friability of the tablet is between 0.2% and 3%, such as between 0.2% and 2%, wherein friability is measured according to European Pharmacopoeia 9.1, test method 2.9.7. by using a pharmaceutical friability-tester PTF 10E from Pharma Test. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet comprises one or more binders other than binders forming part of the DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of 0.1 to 6% by weight of the tablet. 
     Suitable binders include Gum Arabic, Methyl Cellulose, Liquid glucose, Tragacanth, Ethyl Cellulose, Gelatin, Hydroxy Propyl Methyl Cellulose (HPMC), Starches, Hydroxy Propyl Cellulose (HPC), Pregelatinized Starch, Sodium Carboxy Methyl Cellulose (NaCMC), Alginic Acid, Polyvinyl Pyrrolidone (PVP), Maltodextrine (MD); Cellulose, Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), Polyvinyl Alcohols, Polymethacrylates, Copovidone or Microcrystalline Cellulose (MCC), alone or in combination. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the one or more binders comprises one or more cellulose binders. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the one or more binders comprises microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) or hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose (HPMC) or any combination thereof. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the oral tablet comprises hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC) binder in the amount of 0.1 to 6% by weight of the tablet, such as 0.1 to 5%, such as 0.1 to 4%, such as 0.1 to 3%, such as 0.1 to 2% by weight of the tablet. 
     HPC may be applied as a particular attractive binder. Thus, this binder, when used with non-DC sugar alcohols such as erythritol, exhibits an advantageous sensory experience when compared to other well-known binders, such as carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC). In particular, the user of HPC lower than 4% by weight of the tablet is advantageous, such as 0.1 to 3%, such as 0.1 to 2% by weight of the tablet. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the non-DC sugar alcohol particles are particles that are not granulated, and the one or more binders are present as separate components in the tablet. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the non-DC sugar alcohol particles are particles consisting of the sugar alcohol and the particles are not pre-granulated together with the one or more binders that are present in the tablet as separate components. 
     It is noted that the use of binders as particles separate from the non-DC particles does not compromise the advantageous sensory properties even when applying a firm pressure tableting force, whereas the granulation with the binder to the sugar alcohol clearly reduces the desired sensory properties. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the resistance to crunching of the tablet is greater than 60N, such as greater than 70N, such as greater than 80N, such as greater than 90N, such as greater than 100 N, such as greater than 110, such as greater than 130N such as greater than 150N, wherein the resistance to crunching of the tablet is less than 300N, such as less than 250N, such as less than 200N, wherein the resistance to crunching is determined according to European Pharmacopoeia 9.1, test method 2.9.8. by using a pharmaceutical resistance to crunching tester model Pharma Test type PTB 311. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises at least one module, 
     the module comprising more than 10% by weight of compressed non-DC sugar alcohol particles, the resistance to crunching of the module being greater than 60N, such as greater than 70N, such as greater than 80N, such as greater than 90N such as greater than 100 N, where the resistance to crunching is determined according to the European Pharmacopoeia 9.1, test method 2.9.8. by using a pharmaceutical resistance to crunching tester model Pharma Test type PTB 311. 
     High intensity artificial sweetening agents can also be used alone or in combination with the above sweeteners. Preferred high intensity sweeteners include, but are not limited to sucralose, aspartame, salts of acesulfame, alitame, saccharin and its salts, cyclamic acid and its salts, glycyrrhizin, dihydrochalcones, thaumatin, monellin, stevioside (natural intensity sweetener) and the like, alone or in combination. In order to provide longer lasting sweetness and flavor perception, it may be desirable to encapsulate or otherwise control the release of at least a portion of the artificial sweeteners. Techniques such as wet granulation, wax granulation, spray drying, spray chilling, fluid bed coating, conservation, encapsulation in yeast cells and fiber extrusion may be used to achieve desired release characteristics. Encapsulation of sweetening agents can also be provided using another tablet component such as a resinous compound. 
     Usage level of the artificial sweetener will vary considerably and will depend on factors such as potency of the sweetener, rate of release, desired sweetness of the product, level and type of flavor used and cost considerations. Thus, the active level of artificial sweetener may vary from about 0.001 to about 8% by weight (preferably from about 0.02 to about 8% by weight). When carriers used for encapsulation are included, the usage level of the encapsulated sweetener will be proportionately higher. Combinations of sugar and/or non-sugar sweeteners may be used in the formulation. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet comprises an enhancer further to the active ingredient. 
     An enhancer in the present context is provided for the purpose of promoting buccal absorption or absorption in the upper throat of an active ingredient contained in the oral tablet when released from the oral tablet during mastication. 
     The enhancer may include solubilization agents; charge modifying agents; pH control agents; degradative enzyme inhibitors; modulatory agents of epithelial junction physiology; selective transport-enhancing agents; and small hydrophobic penetration enhancer. Further enhancers may of course be included in the oral tablet and enhancers may be mixed with other to promote a buccal absorption of an active pharmaceutical contained and released from the oral tablet. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the enhancer increases release of the active ingredient. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the enhancer increases uptake of the active ingredient into the body. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet comprises a pH controlling agent 
     An advantageous pH controlling agent may e.g. include added base or acid to the tablet to promote the absorption via mucosa of an active pharmaceutical ingredient contained in the tablet. A further attractive pH controlling includes a buffer added to the oral tablet. Some pharmaceutical agents are sensitive to pH in the mucosa and a buffer may facilitate an increasing of absorption via mucosa if this is desired over a gastrointestinal absorption. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet has a weight ratio between said non-DC sugar alcohol particles and said DC sugar alcohol particles, which is between 0.2 and 1.2. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet has a weight ratio between said non-DC sugar alcohol particles and said DC sugar alcohol particles, which is between 0.3 and 1.0. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet has a weight ratio between said non-DC sugar alcohol particles and said DC sugar alcohol particles, which is between 0.3 and 0.7. 
     The weight ratio between non-DC sugar alcohol particles and DC sugar alcohol particles have proven significant according to an embodiment of the invention in the sense that a relatively high amount of non-DC sugar alcohol particles must be present in order to obtain the mouthfeel and taste obtained through the invention. However, this taste and mouthfeel also resides in the DC sugar alcohol particles. An example of such DC sugar alcohol particle is DC grade xylitol, which, together with the non-DC sugar alcohol particles may provide a mouthfeel which is unique and very attractive to test panels. 
     The weight ratio between non-DC sugar alcohol particles and DC sugar alcohol particles have proven significant as mentioned above in relation to the direct sensation and mouthfeel experienced by the user but is has moreover addressed the challenge in relation to mouthfeel when DC sugar alcohol particles crumbles during the initial chew. The mechanical stability of the tablet is much desired when the tablet is in its non-chewed form, but a fast disintegration and dissolving is desirable when the tablet is chewed due to the fact that user of the tablet dislike a sandy mouthfeel induced through small hard-pressed crumbles of DC sugar alcohol. The use of a very high amount of non-DC sugar alcohol particles will facilitate a perceived fast dissolving and disintegration of the tablet after the initial chews. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention the tablet has a weight ratio between said non-DC sugar alcohol particles and said DC sugar alcohol particles, which is greater than 0.3, such as greater than 0.4, such as greater than 0.5. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention the tablet has a weight ratio between said non-DC sugar alcohol particles and said DC sugar alcohol particles, which is smaller than 0.7, such as smaller than 0.6, such as smaller than 0.55. 
     The weight ratio between non-DC sugar alcohol particles and DC sugar alcohol particles is important for the purpose of obtaining an advantageous taste and mouthfeel. By having an upper limit of this weight ratio, the chewer will moreover also experience a desirable crunch sensation when starting masticating the tablet, the crunch being obtained through the use of substantial amounts of DC sugar alcohol particles and the non-DC sugar alcohol particles. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises the non-DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of greater than 0.3 gram. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the weight of non-DC sugar alcohol particles contained in the tablet is greater than greater than 0.4 gram, such as greater than 0.5 gram, such as greater than 0.6 gram, such as greater than 0.7 gram, such as greater than 0.8 gram, such as greater than 0.9 gram, such as greater than 1.0 gram. 
     According to a further embodiment of the invention, the amount of non-DC sugar alcohol particles is relatively high. It is in particular high when considering that the non-DC sugar alcohol in conventional sense is not regarded attractive for compression, but the mouthfeel and salivation perceived by the user is there improved significantly, when compared to low amounts or the same amounts of DC sugar alcohol. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises the non-DC sugar alcohol particles in an amount of less than 3.0 gram, such as less than 2.0 gram, such as less than 1.5 gram. 
     In an embodiment of the invention wherein the tablet has a weight of between 0.5 and 4.0 grams. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the non-DC areas results in induced saliva generation. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention saliva generation upon mastication of the tablet is induced compared to a tablet without non-DC sugar alcohol particles. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention saliva generation upon mastication of the tablet is induced compared to a tablet where the discrete areas are based on DC sugar alcohol particles. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet generates more than 1.5 mL saliva within 30 seconds from onset of mastication. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention the discrete non-DC areas induces saliva generation of more than 2.0 mL saliva within 30 seconds from onset of mastication. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention the discrete non-DC areas induces saliva generation of more than 3.0 mL saliva within 30 seconds from onset of mastication. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet generates more than 1.5 mL saliva within a period from 30 to 90 seconds from onset of mastication. 
     According to an embodiment of the invention the discrete non-DC areas induces saliva generation of more than 2.0 mL saliva within a period from 30 to 90 seconds from onset of mastication. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet generates more than 1.5 mL saliva within a period from 90 to 180 seconds from onset of mastication. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet generates more than 1.5 mL saliva within a period from 180 to 300 seconds from onset of mastication. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet further comprising at least one viscosity modifier. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the at least one viscosity modifier is selected from the group consisting of sodium alginate, pectin, carrageenan, xanthan gum, acacia gum and mixtures thereof. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet further comprising at least one viscolising agent that when hydrated forms a gel having positive surface electrical charge and at least one viscolising agent that when hydrated forms a gel having negative surface electrical charge. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises flavor. 
     The amount of flavor may e.g. be from 0.1 to about 10% by weight of the tablet, such as 0.1 to about 6% by weight of the tablet. 
     Usable flavors include almond, almond amaretto, apple, Bavarian cream, black cherry, black sesame seed, blueberry, brown sugar, bubblegum, butterscotch, cappuccino, caramel, caramel cappuccino, cheesecake (graham crust), chili, cinnamon redhots, cotton candy, circus cotton candy, clove, coconut, coffee, clear coffee, double chocolate, energy cow, ginger, glutamate, graham cracker, grape juice, green apple, Hawaiian punch, honey, Jamaican rum, Kentucky bourbon, kiwi, koolada, lemon, lemon lime, tobacco, maple syrup, maraschino cherry, marshmallow, menthol, milk chocolate, mocha, Mountain Dew, peanut butter, pecan, peppermint, raspberry, banana, ripe banana, root beer, RY  4 , spearmint, strawberry, sweet cream, sweet tarts, sweetener, toasted almond, tobacco, tobacco blend, vanilla bean ice cream, vanilla cupcake, vanilla swirl, vanillin, waffle, Belgian waffle, watermelon, whipped cream, white chocolate, wintergreen, amaretto, banana cream, black walnut, blackberry, butter, butter rum, cherry, chocolate hazelnut, cinnamon roll, cola, creme de menthe, eggnog, English toffee, guava, lemonade, licorice, maple, mint chocolate chip, orange cream, peach, pina colada, pineapple, plum, pomegranate, pralines and cream, red licorice, salt water taffy, strawberry banana, strawberry kiwi, tropical punch, tutti frutti, vanilla, or any combination thereof. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises a lipophilic association between an active ingredient and a fatty acid, such as oleic acid. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises a self-emulsifying system that when hydrated with saliva upon oral administration forms an emulsion. 
     Due to the poor solubility of certain active ingredients in physiological fluids, it is an unmet need to have a high dose of certain active ingredients in a form, that solubilize the active ingredient upon mixture with the body physiological fluids to facilitate bio-absorption. To overcome low oral bioavailability, various lipid-based drug delivery systems and self-emulsifying systems have been developed. Lipid-based delivery systems and particularly self-emulsifying drug delivery systems (SEDDS) have been demonstrated to increase the solubility, dissolution and bioavailability of many insoluble active ingredients. However, lipid-based and SEDDS delivery systems are very limited by the amount of active ingredient loading that has to be dissolved in the vehicle composition. Higher concentration of active ingredients are obtained using co-solvents, which enable loads of up to 30% in specific cases. 
     Particular challenges are considered to arise in formulating oral tablets with SEDDS. For instance, challenges may arise with obtaining a homogenous mixture where variations are avoided and a safe and convenient delivery may be obtained. Also, the general formulation of the oral tablets offering convenience to the user need not be compromised which is often the case if precaution is not taken, such as in cases where a high load of active ingredients is needed. 
     Particularly with respect to SEDDS, the formulation of the present invention may provide some clear benefits, both allowing a higher load of active ingredients and at the same time offer improved sensorics properties of the formulation during use. Other advantages are also present. 
     Importantly, the presence of SEDDS or at least a self-emulsifying agent was seen to act in synergy with increased saliva generation. While increased saliva generation was seen to distribute certain active ingredients and allocate a higher load of active ingredients to for instance mucosal surfaces, the presence of SEDDS or at least a self-emulsifying agent was seen to further increase the uptake of these active ingredients through oral surfaces. Accordingly, the synergy between the presence of SEDDS or at least a self-emulsifying agent and increased saliva generation according to the invention was a surprise to the inventors. In some embodiments, increased saliva generation may result in a higher exposure of the active ingredients to mucosal surfaces. The presence of SEDDS may work to increase the affinity of the active ingredients from this saliva to the mucosa. Particularly, the potential of SEDDS to have a high load of active ingredients further contributes to the synergy of the tablet according to the invention in combination with improved saliva generation. 
     In the present context, SEDDS is a solid or liquid dosage form comprising an oil phase, a surfactant and optionally a co-surfactant, characterized primarily in that said dosage form can form oil-in-water emulsion spontaneously in the oral cavity or at ambient temperature (referring generally to body temperature, namely 37° C.). When a SEDDS enters the oral cavity, it is initially self-emulsified as emulsion droplets and rapidly dispersed throughout the oral cavity, and thus reducing the irritation caused by the direct contact of the active ingredient with the mucous membrane of the oral cavity, and hence helping on taste-masking active ingredients. In the oral cavity, the structure of the emulsion microparticulate will be changed or destroyed. The resulting microparticulate of micrometer or nanometer level can penetrate into the mucous membrane of for instance the oral cavity, and the absorbed oil droplets enter the blood circulation, thereby significantly improving the bioavailability of the active ingredient. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the self-emulsifying system comprises one or more emulsifiers and one or more oil carriers. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the self-emulsifying system comprises one or more emulsifiers, one or more oil carriers and one or more solubilizers. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the self-emulsifying system comprises one or more emulsifiers, one or more oil carriers, one or more solubilizers and one or more solvents. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the self-emulsifying system comprises one or more emulsifiers and one or more solvents. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the self-emulsifying system comprises one or more emulsifiers that have both emulsifying and solubilizing properties. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the self-emulsifying system comprises one or more emulsifiers that act as both an emulsifier and a carrier. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the self-emulsifying system comprises one or more emulsifiers that act as both an emulsifier, a carrier and a solubilizer. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the self-emulsifying system comprises one or more fatty acids, one or more glycerols, one or more waxes, one or more flavonoids and one or more terpenes. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the self-emulsifying system comprises one or more emulsifiers that have an HLB-value of more than 6, preferably of 8-18. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the one or more emulsifiers are selected from the group consisting of PEG-35 castor oil, PEG-6 oleoyl glycerides, PEG-6 linoleoyl glycerides, PEG-8 caprylic/capric glyceride, sorbitan monolaurate, sorbitan monooleate, polyoxyethylene (20) sorbitan monolaurate, polyoxyethylene (60) sorbitan monostearate, polyoxyethylene (80) sorbitan monooleate, lauroylpoloxyl-32 glycerides, stearoyl polyoxyl-32 glycerides, polyoxyl-32 stearate, propylene glycol mono laurate, propylene glycol di laurate, and mixtures and combinations thereof. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the one or more emulsifiers comprise PEG-35 castor oil. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the oil carrier is selected from the group consisting of natural fatty acids; medium-chain triglycerides of caprylic (C8) and capric (C10) acids; propylene glycol esters of caprylic (C8) and capric (C10) acids; mono-, di- and triglycerides of mainly linoleic (C18:2) and oleic (C18:1) acids; fatty acid 18:1 cis-9; natural fatty acids; mono-, di- and triglycerides of oleic (C18:1) acid, and mixtures and combinations thereof. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the one or more solvents are selected from the group consisting of polyglyceryl-3 dioleate, 1,2-propandiol, polyethylene glycol 300, polyethylene glycol 400, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether, and mixtures and combinations thereof. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the oil carrier is selected from the group consisting of corn oil, Labrafac lipophile WL1349, Labrafac PG, Maisine CC, oleic acid, olive oil, Peceol, and mixtures and combinations thereof. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the one or more solvents are selected from the group consisting of polyglyceryl-3 dioleate, 1,2-propandiol, polyethylene glycol 300, polyethylene glycol 400, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether, and mixtures and combinations thereof. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the one or more solubilizers are selected from the group consisting of lauroylpoloxyl-32 glycerides; stearoyl polyoxyl-32 glycerides; Polyoxyl-32 stearate; synthetic copolymer of ethylene oxide (80) and propylene oxide (27); polyvinyl caprolactam-polyvinyl acetate-polyethylene glycol graft copolymer; alpha-, beta- or gamma cyclodextrins and derivatives thereof pea proteins (globulins, albumins, glutelins proteins); and mixtures and combinations thereof. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises an active pharmaceutical ingredient and a self-emulsifying system that when hydrated with saliva upon oral administration forms an emulsion. 
     In an embodiment of the invention, the tablet comprises nicotine and a self-emulsifying system that when hydrated with saliva upon oral administration forms an emulsion. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet comprises particles comprising gum base, and wherein the tablet is designed to be masticated into a coherent residual containing water-insoluble components. 
     The application of gum may in the present context may invoke a delay of release for active ingredients and this may again promote the buccal and upper throat absorption of active pharmaceutical ingredient when this is released from the oral tablet during mastication. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the oral tablet contains particles comprising gum base, and wherein the gum base comprises at least 5% by weight of elastomer. 
     The specific use of a relatively high proportion of elastomer in the gum base may effectively be used for modification of the release of active ingredients in terms of time and amount and the elastomer may also provide robust structure of the tablet facilitating that it is chewed into a coherent residual containing water-insoluble components. Some active ingredient may risk invoking disintegration of the residual whereas an elastomer may increase the coherence and compensate for the aggressive active ingredients. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the gum base comprises at least 10% by weight of elastomer. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the gum base comprises at least 15% by weight of elastomer. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the gum base comprises between 15% and 25% by weight of elastomer. 
     In an embodiment of the invention the gum base comprises between 17% and 23% by weight of elastomer. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet is free of gum base. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet dosage form is for use in buccal absorption of active ingredients. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the oral tablet is essentially consisting of ingredients that are present in nature. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the oral tablet comprises a natural high intensity sweetener, such as stevioside. 
     The invention further relates to a tablet dosage form for buccal absorption of active ingredients comprising a population of particles and an active ingredient to be released in the oral cavity for absorption through the oral mucosa, the population of particles comprising directly compressible (DC) and non-directly compressible (non-DC) sugar alcohol particles, the tablet being designed to turn into liquid within 20 seconds of mastication. 
     The invention further relates to a tablet dosage form for buccal absorption of active ingredients comprising a population of particles and an active ingredient to be released in the oral cavity for absorption through the oral mucosa, the population of particles comprising directly compressible (DC) and non-directly compressible (non-DC) sugar alcohol particles, the tablet being designed to dissolve within 20 seconds of mastication. 
     According to an advantageous embodiment of the invention the tablet dosage form according to any of the two aforementioned embodiments is composed according to the invention or any of its embodiments. 
     The invention further relates to a method of providing buccal absorption of active ingredients, the method comprising the steps of: 
     i) providing a tablet dosage form comprising a population of particles and an active ingredient to be released in the oral cavity for absorption through the oral mucosa, the population of particles comprising directly compressible (DC) and non-directly compressible (non-DC) sugar alcohol particles, and 
     ii) masticating the tablet and thereby releasing the active ingredient in the oral cavity for absorption through the oral mucosa induced by a plurality of discrete non-DC areas in the tablet. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention step ii) of masticating the tablet involves releasing at least 50% by weight of the active ingredient within 20 seconds from onset of mastication. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the method of the invention or any of its embodiments involves providing the tablet of the invention or any of its embodiments. 
    
    
     
       THE FIGURES 
       The invention will now be described with reference to the drawings where 
         FIGS. 1 a  and 1 b    shows an embodiment of the invention, 
         FIGS. 2 a  and 2 b    shows a two-module version of an embodiment of the invention, 
         FIGS. 3 a  and 3 b    shows a three-module version of an embodiment of the invention, 
         FIGS. 4 and 5  illustrates embodiments of the invention 
         FIG. 6  illustrates a two-module version of an embodiment of the invention and where 
         FIG. 7  illustrates the short and long-term effect of salivation obtained through different types of non-DC sugar alcohols. 
         FIG. 8  illustrates a light microscope picture of a cross-section of a two-module version of an embodiment of the invention. The right side of the tablet indicated with slightly darker color constitutes a first module of the tablet, and the left side of the tablet indicated with lighter color constitutes a second module of the tablet. In the first module, non-DC sugar alcohol particles may be seen as dark, discrete areas evenly distributed in the tablet. 
         FIG. 9  illustrates a light microscope picture of a cross-section of a two-module version of a tablet as in  FIG. 8 , but without non-DC sugar alcohol particles in the tablet. 
         FIG. 10  illustrates a light microscope picture of a cross-section of a one-module version of an embodiment of the invention. Non-DC sugar alcohol particles may be seen as dark, discrete areas evenly distributed in the tablet. 
         FIG. 11  illustrates a light microscope picture of a cross-section of a one-module version of a tablet as in  FIG. 10 , but without non-DC sugar alcohol particles in the tablet. 
         FIG. 12  illustrates a scanning electron microscope (SEM) close up picture of a cross-section of the first module of the tablet in  FIG. 8 . The morphology of non-DC sugar alcohol particles with a size of more than 500 μm may be seen in detail together with other particles as large irregular particles. 
         FIG. 13  illustrates a scanning electron microscope (SEM) close up picture of a cross-section of the second module of the tablet in  FIG. 8  where non-DC sugar alcohol particles are not present. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     As used herein the term “tablet dosage form” is considered as a tablet as a dosage form. Particularly, the tablet dosage form is considered as a tablet formed by tableting, i.e. compression of a particle composition, comprising the mentioned population of particles. Typically, the tablet dosage form may also be referred to as a tablet. Thus, the tablet dosage form is considered a compressed tablet formed by a plurality of particles. 
     The term “weight of the oral tablet” or similar wording meaning the same is defined in the present context as weight of the oral tablet, not including the weight of an outer coating, such as a hard coating, soft coating, and the like. 
     By the phrase “texture” is meant a qualitative measure of the properties of the oral tablet and of the overall mouth-feel experienced by the user during use. Thus, the term “texture” encompasses measurable quantities such as hardness as well as more subjective parameters related to the feel experienced by a user. 
     The term “sustained release” or “extended release” is herein intended to mean prolonged release over time. The term “rapid release” or “quick release” or “high release” is herein intended to mean a higher content released for a given period of time. The term “controlled release” is intended to mean a release of a substance from an oral tablet by the aid of active use of the oral tablet in the oral cavity of the subject, whereby the active use is controlling the amount of substance released. 
     The verb “to comprise” as is used in this description and in the claims and its conjugations are used in its non-limiting sense to mean that items following the word are included, but items not specifically mentioned are not excluded. In addition, reference to an element by the indefinite article “a” or “an” does not exclude the possibility that more than one of the elements are present, unless the context clearly requires that there is one and only one of the elements. The indefinite article “a” or “an” thus usually means “at least one”. Additionally, the words “a” and “an” when used in the present document in connection with the word comprising or containing denote “one or more.” The expression “one or more” is intended to mean one, two, three or more. 
     As used herein, the term “approximately” or “about” in reference to a number are generally taken to include numbers that fall within a range of 5%, 10%, 15%, or 20% in either direction (greater than or less than) of the number unless otherwise stated or otherwise evident from the context (except where such number would be less than 0% or exceed 100% of a possible value). 
     In the present context the phrase “population of particles” refers to a statistical population of particles. The population of particles may be characterized by a number of different parameters, e.g. statistical parameters such as distribution of particles, average particle size, particle size distribution width, etc. The population of particles may have subpopulations, such as DC sugar alcohol particles, non-DC sugar alcohol particles, or in some embodiments particles comprising gum base. The phrasing “population of particles” may in an embodiment of the invention be provided as a plurality of tableted particles and where the population of particles are tableted in one module or it may refer to a population of particles where some of the particles are tableted into one module and other particles are tableted into another module. 
     In the present context, the term “non-DC areas” refers to small volumes or spaces formed during tableting from the non-DC particles of non-DC sugar alcohol. Moreover, each of the non-DC areas may be composed of a single non-DC sugar alcohol particle, or may comprise several non-DC sugar alcohol particles. When the non-DC areas are distinct, i.e. not diffuse, the non-DC areas may be evenly distributed in the tablet, or at least one module thereof when the tablet comprises two or more modules. In such embodiments, where the non-DC areas are evenly distributed in in the tablet, or at least one module thereof, the non-DC areas may thus facilitate an even saliva generation in the mouth upon mastication. 
     The term “non-DC sugar alcohol particles” refer to particles of non-directly compressible (non-DC) sugar alcohol. It is noted that the terms “non-DC sugar alcohol particles” and “non-DC particles” are used interchangeably. In the present context, the non-DC sugar alcohol particles refer to particles which have not been preprocessed by granulation with e.g. other sugar alcohols or binders for the purpose of obtaining so-called direct compressible particles (DC). In the present context, non-DC sugar alcohol particles include particles obtained by crystallization followed by milling which does not involve other sugar alcohols or binders. Thus, non-DC sugar alcohol particles are considered as particles consisting of non-DC sugar alcohol. 
     The term “DC sugar alcohol particles” refer to particles of direct compressible (DC) sugar alcohol. It is noted that the terms “DC sugar alcohol particles” and “DC particles” are used interchangeably. DC sugar alcohol particles may be obtained e.g. as particles of sugar alcohols having DC grade by nature, e.g. sorbitol, or by granulating non-DC sugar alcohol with e.g. other sugar alcohols or binders for the purpose of obtaining so-called direct compressible particles (DC). Also, granulation of non-DC sugar alcohol with water as binder is considered to result in “DC sugar alcohol particles” in the present context. 
     In the present context when the non-DC areas are referred to as “discrete” this signifies that the non-DC sugar alcohols are not continuously distributed, but present in the discrete areas corresponding to the discrete nature of the non-DC sugar alcohol particles. 
     When referring to induced saliva generation, it is noted that this induced saliva generation exceeds any saliva generation without the use of the tablet of the invention. Particularly, in an embodiment the induced saliva generation exceeds saliva generation when using conventional tablets without non-DC areas. Then, induced saliva generation is increased over any saliva generation associated with conventional products, e.g. by comparing with a tablet without non-DC sugar alcohol particles, or with a tablet where the discrete areas are based on DC sugar alcohol particles. 
     When referring to induced saliva generation, the saliva generation is tested using the following method, unless stated otherwise. 
     Test subject abstain from eating and drinking at least 30 minutes before initiation of any test. Immediately before introducing of the tablet into the oral cavity, the test subject swallows. The test subject refrains from swallowing during the test. Immediately after introducing of the tablet into the oral cavity, the test subject starts masticating the tablet at a frequency of 1 chew per second for 20 seconds. Then, saliva and any remains of the tablet is kept in the mouth within chewing for 10 second. 30 seconds after starting the test, the test subject discards saliva including any tablet fragments into a plastic cup, which is weighted. Saliva discarded also at 90 seconds after onset of mastication, at 180 seconds after onset of mastication, at 300 seconds after onset of mastication, at 420 seconds after onset of mastication, and at 600 seconds after onset of mastication. At all times, the test subject makes as little movement as possible, and refrains from swallowing. 
     As used herein, the term “orally disintegrating tablet” or “ODT” is intended to mean a tablet as understood by a skilled person within the art of ODT tablets, i.e. a solid dosage form that disintegrates rapidly (within seconds) without water when placed on the tongue. 
     As used herein, the term “particle size” refers to the average particle size as determined according to European Pharmacopoeia 9.1 when using test method 2.9.38 particle size distribution estimation by analytical sieving, unless otherwise specifically is mentioned. 
     The term “particle” or similar wording is intended to denote a single, discrete composition of solid matter, such as a granule or individual elements in powder, having a certain size that may deviate considerable. 
     As used herein the term “active ingredient” refers to a substance that is biologically active and has a physiological effect on the human body for the benefit of the human body or part thereof. Active ingredients include active pharmaceutical ingredients, but also other active substances such as nutraceuticals. 
     A “self-emulsifying agent” is an agent which will form an emulsion when presented with an alternate phase with a minimum energy requirement. In contrast, an emulsifying agent, as opposed to a self-emulsifying agent, is one requiring additional energy to form an emulsion. 
     In the present context the term “release” refers to the released substance being liberated from the water-soluble matrix. In some embodiments, the process of releasing a substance corresponds to the substance being dissolved in saliva. The term “release” in the present context is intended to mean tested under “in vivo” conditions, if not stated otherwise. In the present context, when the tablet is masticated, “in vivo” conditions is intended to mean that a samples is masticated with a chewing frequency of 60 chews pr. minute for a certain period of time in a test panel of 8 test persons, if not stated otherwise. These test persons abstain from eating and drinking at least 30 minutes before initiation of any test. The test persons are healthy persons appointed on an objective basis according to specified requirements. 
     In the present context the term “turn into liquid” is intended to mean that the tablet disintegrates and the fragments or particles of the tablet are either suspended or dissolved in saliva, perceived as liquid by a test person in accordance with the test procedure of induced saliva generation. 
     In the present context, “crunchiness”, “crunch”, “crunching” or similar expressions, when used in connection with testing of maximum resistance of a tablet, is intended to have the same meaning. 
     By the terms “water-insoluble gum base” or “gum base” or “gum base matrix” or similar wording is meant the mainly water-insoluble ingredients and hydrophobic gum base ingredients. The “gum base” may contain gum base polymers and plasticizers, waxes, emulsifiers, fats and/or fillers. 
     As used herein the term “buccal absorption” refers to a substance diffusing across the oral mucosa from the oral cavity to enter the bloodstream. 
     As used herein the term “oral mucosa” refers to the mucous membrane in the oral cavity, i.e. in the mouth. 
     In the following raw materials will refer to the mixed particles to be compressed into a tablet according to embodiments of the invention unless otherwise stated. 
     The following description outlines explanations of how the tablet of the invention may be produced and further details of what may be added to the inventive composition. 
     Typically, the process of manufacture of the inventive tablet may be performed in a single tablet press, such as a rotary tablet press. But it may be a benefit under some circumstances to apply a separate tablet press. 
     Preferably, the upper punch is convex which gives the upper face of the pressed tablet a concave form. 
     It should of course be noted that the shape of the punches may vary depending of the desired tablet shape. 
     In some embodiments of the invention, pressing of the tablets are performed at a force of 20 to 50 kN. 
     Important raw materials of the inventive tablet are non-DC sugar alcohol particles in combination with DC sugar alcohol particles. 
     The DC sugar alcohol particles refer to sugar alcohols known within the art as being direct compressible (DC). 
     The non-DC sugar alcohol particles refer to sugar alcohols known within the art as being non-directly compressible (DC). 
     According to a further embodiment of the invention, the applied non-DC sugar alcohol particles are best characterized as being non-directly compressible (non-DC). The use of non-DC sugar alcohols when compared to conventionally applied direct compressible sugar alcohol (DC) has shown remarkable effects to the user&#39;s perception of the delivery vehicle when chewed. This may partly be due to the somewhat larger size of non-DC sugar alcohol, when compared to DC sugar alcohol, but is may also be a result of a high content of sugar alcohol in the individual particles applied for compression. DC sugar alcohols, which for obvious reasons are marketed and applied for compression purposes, does not result in such improved salivation effect and mouthfeel. 
     It should be noted that the terminology non-DC is easily understood within the field of technology. Suppliers or sugar alcohol provides clear guidance to the user as for the ability for use in relation to compression of tablets. A non-DC particle in this connection is referred to as a particle which is not expressly recommended by the supplier for compression. Examples of a non-DC grade of erythritol includes Zerose™ erythritol 16952F supplied by Cargill. Further examples of non-DC sugar alcohol particles include non-DC xylitol as Xivia C from Dupont, non-DC isomalt as Isomalt GS from Beneo Paltinit, non-DC mannitol as Pearlitol from Roquette, non DC maltitol as Maltisorb. P200 from Roquette. Examples of a direct compressible (DC) grade of erythritol include Zerose™ DC 16966 also supplied by Cargill. Further examples of DC sugar alcohols include sorbitol particles provided as e.g. Neosorb® P 300 DC from Roquette, mannitol particles provided as e.g. Pearlitol® 300DC or Pearlitol 200 SD from Roquette, maltitol provided as e.g. SweetPearl® P 300 DC, xylitol provided as e.g. Xylisorb® 200 DC or Xylitab from Dupont. 
     Non-direct compressible (non-DC) sugar alcohols may include non-DC grades of Xylitol, non-DC grades of Erythritol, non-DC grades of Mannitol, non-DC grades of maltitol, non-DC grades of Lactitol, non-DC grades of Isomalt, or other suitable non-DC grades of sugar alcohols. 
     Direct compressible (DC) sugar alcohols may include sorbitol which is DC by nature, DC grades of Xylitol, DC grades of Erythritol, DC grades of Mannitol, DC grades of maltitol, DC grades of Lactitol, Isomalt or other suitable DC grades of sugar alcohols. 
     The present invention benefits from a synergy between the non-DC sugar alcohol particles and the DC sugar alcohol particles. The DC sugar alcohols may be e.g. sorbitol which is direct compressible by nature or it may be other sugar alcohols which has been preprocessed, e.g. by granulation with a suitable binder, to obtain particles which when compressed may encapsulate the non-DC sugar alcohol particles into a mechanically stable tablet. At the same time the non-DC sugar alcohol particles serves as a means for salivation which is both attractive to the user and also serves for the purpose of dissolving the DC sugar alcohol particles when the tablet is chewed as fast as possible. 
     According to embodiments of the invention, encapsulated flavors or active ingredients may be added to the final blend of raw materials prior to compression. 
     Different methods of encapsulating flavors or active ingredients, which may both refer to flavors or active ingredients mixed into the raw materials to be compressed into the chewing gum may e.g. include spray drying, spray cooling, film coating, coascervation, Double emulsion method (Extrusion technology) or prilling. 
     Materials to be used for the above-mentioned encapsulation methods may e.g. include Gelatine, Wheat protein, Soya protein, Sodium caseinate, Caseine, Gum arabic, Mod. starch, Hydrolyzed starches (maltodextrines), Alginates, Pectin, Carregeenan, Xanthan gum, Locus bean gum, Chitosan, Bees wax, Candelilla wax, Carnauba wax, Hydrogenated vegetable oils, Zein and/or Sucrose. 
     Preferably, these ingredients should be added subsequent to any significant heating or mixing. In other words, the active ingredients should preferably be added immediately prior to the compression of the final tablet. 
     If applying the present invention in relation to chewing gum, the adding of active ingredients may be cautiously blended with pre-mixed gum base granulates and further ingredients such as the ingredients stipulated by the present claims, immediately prior to the final compression of the tablet. 
     For those active ingredients listed below, it should be noted that any active ingredient not suitable for absorption through the oral mucosa are considered as a further, optional active ingredient. 
     In one embodiment the tablet according to the invention comprises a pharmaceutically, cosmetically or biologically active substance. Examples of such active substances, a comprehensive list of which is found e.g. in WO 00/25598, which is incorporated herein by reference, include drugs, dietary supplements, antiseptic agents, pH adjusting agents, anti-smoking agents and substances for the care or treatment of the oral cavity and the teeth such as hydrogen peroxide and compounds capable of releasing urea during chewing. Examples of useful active substances in the form of antiseptics include salts and derivatives of guanidine and biguanidine (for instance chlorhexidine diacetate) and the following types of substances with limited water-solubility: quaternary ammonium compounds (e.g. ceramine, chloroxylenol, crystal violet, chloramine), aldehydes (e.g. paraformaldehyde), derivatives of dequaline, polynoxyline, phenols (e.g. thymol, p-chlorophenol, cresol), hexachlorophene, salicylic anilide compounds, triclosan, halogenes (iodine, iodophores, chloroamine, dichlorocyanuric acid salts), alcohols (3,4 dichlorobenzyl alcohol, benzyl alcohol, phenoxyethanol, phenylethanol), cf. also Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 28th edition, pages 547-578; metal salts, complexes and compounds with limited water-solubility, such as aluminum salts, (for instance aluminum potassium sulphate AlK(SO4)2, 12H2O) and salts, complexes and compounds of boron, barium, strontium, iron, calcium, zinc, (zinc acetate, zinc chloride, zinc gluconate), copper (copper chloride, copper sulphate), lead, silver, magnesium, sodium, potassium, lithium, molybdenum, vanadium should be included; other compositions for the care of mouth and teeth: for instance; salts, complexes and compounds containing fluorine (such as sodium fluoride, sodium monofluorophosphate, aminofluorides, stannous fluoride), phosphates, carbonates and selenium. Further active substances can be found in J. Dent. Res. Vol. 28 No. 2, pages 160-171, 1949. 
     Examples of active substances in the form of agents adjusting the pH in the oral cavity include: acids, such as adipic acid, succinic acid, fumaric acid, or salts thereof or salts of citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, phosphoric acid and glutaric acid and acceptable bases, such as carbonates, hydrogen carbonates, phosphates, sulphates or oxides of sodium, potassium, ammonium, magnesium or calcium, especially magnesium and calcium. 
     Active ingredients may comprise the below mentioned compounds or derivates thereof but are not limited thereto: Acetaminophen, Acetylsalicylic acid, Buprenorphine, Bromhexin, Celcoxib, Codeine, Diphenhydramin, Diclofenac, Etoricoxib, Ibuprofen, Indometacin, Ketoprofen, Lumiracoxib, Morphine, Naproxen, Oxycodon, Parecoxib, Piroxicam, Pseudoefedrin, Rofecoxib, Tenoxicam, Tramadol, Valdecoxib, Calciumcarbonat, Magaldrate, Disulfiram, Bupropion, Nicotine, Azithromycin, Clarithromycin, Clotrimazole, Erythromycin, Tetracycline, Granisetron, Ondansetron, Prometazin, Tropisetron, Brompheniramine, Ceterizin, leco-Ceterizin, Chlorcyclizine, Chlorpheniramin, Chlorpheniramin, Difenhydramine, Doxylamine, Fenofenadin, Guaifenesin, Loratidin, des-Loratidin, Phenyltoloxamine, Promethazin, Pyridamine, Terfenadin, Troxerutin, Methyldopa, Methylphenidate, Benzalcon. Chloride, Benzeth. Chloride, Cetylpyrid. Chloride, Chlorhexidine, Ecabet-sodium, Haloperidol, Allopurinol, Colchinine, Theophylline, Propanolol, Prednisolone, Prednisone, Fluoride, Urea, Actot, Glibenclamide, Glipizide, Metformin, Miglitol, Repaglinide, Rosiglitazone, Apomorfin, Cialis, Sildenafil, Vardenafil, Diphenoxylate, Simethicone, Cimetidine, Famotidine, Ranitidine, Ratinidine, cetrizin, Loratadine, Aspirin, Benzocaine, Dextrometorphan, Phenylpropanolamine, Pseudoephedrine, Cisapride, Domperidone, Metoclopramide, Acyclovir, Dioctylsulfosucc., Phenolphtalein, Almotriptan, Eletriptan, Ergotamine, Migea, Naratriptan, Rizatriptan, Sumatriptan, Zolmitriptan, Aluminum salts, Calcium salts, Ferro salts, Ag-salts, Zinc-salts, Amphotericin B, Chlorhexidine, Miconazole, Triamcinolonacetonid, Melatonine, Phenobarbitol, Caffeine, Benzodiazepiner, Hydroxyzine, Meprobamate, Phenothiazine, Buclizine, Brometazine, Cinnarizine, Cyclizine, Difenhydramine, Dimenhydrinate, Buflomedil, Amphetamine, Caffeine, Ephedrine, Orlistat, Phenyl ephedrine, Phenylpropanolamin, Pseudoephedrine, Sibutramin, Ketoconazole, Nitroglycerin, Nystatin, Progesterone, Testosterone, Vitamin B12, Vitamin C, Vitamin A, Vitamin D, Vitamin E, Pilocarpin, Aluminumaminoacetat, Cimetidine, Esomeprazole, Famotidine, Lansoprazole, Magnesiumoxide, Nizatide and or Ratinidine. 
     The invention is suitable for increased or accelerated release of active agents selected among the group of dietary supplements, oral and dental compositions, antiseptic agents, pH adjusting agents, anti-smoking agents, sweeteners, flavorings, aroma agents or drugs. Some of those will be described below. 
     The active agents to be used in connection with the present invention may be any substance desired to be released from the tablet. The active agents, for which a controlled and/or accelerated rate of release is desired, are primarily substances with a limited water-solubility, typically below 10 g/100 mL inclusive of substances which are totally water-insoluble. Examples are medicines, dietary supplements, oral compositions, anti-smoking agents, highly potent sweeteners, pH adjusting agents, flavorings etc. 
     Other active ingredients are, for instance, paracetamol, benzocaine, cinnarizine, menthol, carvone, caffeine, chlorhexidine-di-acetate, cyclizine hydrochloride, 1,8-cineol, nandrolone, miconazole, mystatine, sodium fluoride, nicotine, cetylpyridinium chloride, other quaternary ammonium compounds, vitamin E, vitamin A, vitamin D, glibenclamide or derivatives thereof, progesterone, acetylsalicylic acid, dimenhydrinate, cyclizine, metronidazole, sodium hydrogen carbonate, the active components from ginkgo, the active components from propolis, the active components from ginseng, methadone, oil of peppermint, salicylamide, hydrocortisone or astemizole. 
     Examples of active agents in the form of dietary supplements are for instance salts and compounds having the nutritive effect of vitamin B2 (riboflavin), B12, folinic acid, folic acid, niacine, biotine, poorly soluble glycerophosphates, amino acids, the vitamins A, D, E and K, minerals in the form of salts, complexes and compounds containing calcium, phosphorus, magnesium, iron, zinc, copper, iodine, manganese, chromium, selenium, molybdenum, potassium, sodium or cobalt. 
     Furthermore, reference is made to lists of nutritionists accepted by the authorities in different countries such as for instance US code of Federal Regulations, Title 21, Section 182.5013.182 5997 and 182.8013-182.8997. 
     Examples of active agents in the form of antiseptics are for instance salts and compounds of guanidine and biguanidine (for instance chlorhexidine diacetate) and the following types of substances with limited water-solubility: quaternary ammonium compounds (for instance ceramine, chloroxylenol, crystal violet, chloramine), aldehydes (for instance paraformaldehyde), compounds of dequaline, polynoxyline, phenols (for instance thymol, para chlorophenol, cresol) hexachlorophene, salicylic anilide compounds, triclosan, halogenes (iodine, iodophores, chloroamine, dichlorocyanuric acid salts), alcohols (3,4 dichlorobenzyl alcohol, benzyl alcohol, phenoxyethanol, phenylethanol), cf. furthermore Martindale, The Extra Pharmacopoeia, 28th edition, pages 547-578; metal salts, complexes and compounds with limited water-solubility, such as aluminum salts, (for instance aluminum potassium sulphate AlK(SO4)2,12H2O) and furthermore salts, complexes and compounds of boron, barium, strontium, iron, calcium, zinc, (zinc acetate, zinc chloride, zinc gluconate), copper (copper chloride, copper sulfate), lead, silver, magnesium, sodium, potassium, lithium, molybdenum, vanadium should be included; other compositions for the care of mouth and teeth: for instance; salts, complexes and compounds containing fluorine (such as sodium fluoride, sodiummonofluorophosphate, amino fluorides, stannous fluoride), phosphates, carbonates and selenium. 
     Cf. furthermore J. Dent.Res. Vol. 28 No. 2, pages 160-171, 1949, wherein a wide range of tested compounds is mentioned. 
     Examples of active agents in the form of agents adjusting the pH in the oral cavity include for instance: acceptable acids, such as adipic acid, succinic acid, fumaric acid, or salts thereof or salts of citric acid, tartaric acid, malic acid, acetic acid, lactic acid, phosphoric acid and glutaric acid and acceptable bases, such as carbonates, hydrogen carbonates, phosphates, sulfates or oxides of sodium, potassium, ammonium, magnesium or calcium, especially magnesium and calcium. 
     Examples of active agents in the form of anti-smoking agents include for instance: nicotine, tobacco powder or silver salts, for instance silver acetate, silver carbonate and silver nitrate. 
     Further examples of active agents are medicines of any type. 
     Examples of active agents in the form of medicines include caffeine, salicylic acid, salicyl amide and related substances (acetylsalicylic acid, choline salicylate, magnesium salicylate, sodium salicylate), paracetamol, salts of pentazocine (pentazocine hydrochloride and pentazocinelactate), buprenorphine hydrochloride, codeine hydrochloride and codeine phosphate, morphine and morphine salts (hydrochloride, sulfate, tartrate), methadone hydrochloride, ketobemidone and salts of ketobemidone (hydrochloride), beta-blockers, (propranolol), calcium antagonists, verapamil hydrochloride, nifedinpine as well as suitable substances and salts thereof mentioned in Pharm. Int., Nov. 85, pages 267-271, Barney H. Hunter and Robert L. Talbert, nitroglycerine, erythrityl tetranitrate, strychnine and salts thereof, lidocaine, tetracaine hydrochloride, etorphine hydrochloride, atropine, insulin, enzymes (for instance papain, trypsin, amyloglucosidase, glucoseoxidase, streptokinase, streptodornase, dextranase, alpha amylase), polypeptides (oxytocin, gonadorelin, (LH.RH), desmopressin acetate (DDAVP), isoxsuprine hydrochloride, ergotamine compounds, chloroquine (phosphate, sulfate), isosorbide, demoxytocin, heparin. 
     Other active ingredients include beta-lupeol, Letigen®, Sildenafil citrate and derivatives thereof. 
     Further examples of active ingredients include dental products including Carbamide, CPP Caseine Phospho Peptide; Chlorhexidine, Chlorhexidine di acetate, Chlorhexidine Chloride, Chlorhexidine di gluconate, Hexetedine, Strontium chloride, Potassium Chloride, Sodium bicarbonate, Sodium carbonate, Fluor containing ingredients, Fluorides, Sodium fluoride, Aluminum fluoride. 
     Further examples of active ingredients include Ammonium fluoride, Calcium fluoride, Stannous fluoride, Other fluor containing ingredients Ammonium fluorosilicate, Potassium fluorosilicate, Sodium fluorosilicate, Ammonium monofluorphosphate, Calcium monofluorphosphate, Potassium monofluorphosphate, Sodium monofluorphosphate, Octadecentyl Ammonium fluoride, Stearyl Trihydroxyethyl Propylenediamine Dihydrofluoride 
     Further examples of active ingredients include vitamins. Vitamins include A, B1, B2, B6, B12, Folinic acid, Folic acid, niacin, Pantothenic acid, biotine, C, D, E, K. Minerals include Calcium, phosphor, magnesium, iron, Zinc, Copper, Iod, Mangan, Crom, Selene, Molybden. Other active ingredients include: Q10®, enzymes. Natural drugs including  Ginkgo biloba , ginger, and fish oil. 
     Further examples of active ingredients include migraine drugs such as Serotonin antagonists: Sumatriptan, Zolmitriptan, Naratriptan, Rizatriptan, Eletriptan; nausea drugs such as Cyclizin, Cinnarizin, Dimenhydramin, Difenhydrinat; hay fever drugs such as Cetrizin, Loratidin, pain relief drugs such as Buprenorfin, Tramadol, oral disease drugs such as Miconazol, Amphotericin B, Triamcinolonaceton; and the drugs Cisaprid, Domperidon, Metoclopramid. In a preferred embodiment the invention relates to the release of Nicotine and its salts. 
     In an advantageous embodiment of the invention the active ingredient is selected from active ingredients for the throat selected from acetylcysteine, ambroxol, amylmetacresol, benzocaine, bisacodyl, bismuth sub salicylate, bromhexine, cetirizine, cetylpyridinium, chlorhexidine, dextromethorphan hydrobromide, 2,4-dichlorobenzyl alcohol, doxylamine succinate, eucalyptus oil, flurbiprofen, glycerin, hexylresorcinol, lidocaine, menthol, myrrh, paracetamol, pectin, peppermint oil, phenol, phenylephrine, povidone-iodine, pseudoephedrine, ranitidine, simethicone, sodium docusate, spearmint, zinc, or any combination thereof; active ingredients for the gastrointestinal tract selected from alginate, atenolol, aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), ampicillin, aminosalicylates, anhydrous citric acid, aspirin, bisacodyl, bismuth subsalicylate, bupropion, caffeine, calcium, calcium carbonate, cetirizine, cimetidine, cisapride, clarithromycin, desloratadine, dexlansoprazole, diphenhydramine HCl, diphenhydramine citrate, dimenhydrinate, docusate erythromycin, dopamine, esomeprazole, famotidine, fexofenadine HCl, guaifenesin, hydrotalcite, ibuprofen, ketoprofen, lactase enzyme, lansoprazole, loratadine, lorcaserin, loperamide, loperamide HCl, magnesium, magnesium carbonate, magnesium hydroxide, melatonin, methamphetamine HCl, metoclopramide, metronidazole, montelukast, mycostatin, naltrexone, naproxen, naproxen sodium, nizatidine, omeprazole, ondansetron, orlistat, pantoprazole, paracetamol (acetaminophen), pectin, phentermine HCl, polypodium leucotomos, prednisolone, prednisone, progesterone, propranolol, propantheline bromide, pseudoephedrine HCl, phentermine, rabeprazole, ranitidine, roflumilast, scopoloamine butyl hydroxide, simethicone, sodium, sodium bicarbonate, sodium docusate, sumatriptan, testosterone, tetracycline, topiramate, vitamin A, vitamin B, vitamin B12, vitamin C (ascorbic acid), vitamin D, and vitamin E, vitamin K, or any combination thereof, and active ingredients for buccal absorption selected from atenolol, baclofen, caffeine, carvedilol, chlorpheniramine, chlorpheniramine maleate, fluticasone propionate, maleate, desmopressin, diltiazem hydrochloride, doxylamine succinate, mycostatin, nicotine, nifedipine, nitroglycerin, omeprazole, ondansetron, oxymetazoline HCl, oxytocin, phenylephrine, piroxicam, prednisone, propranolol, salbutamol sulphate, scopoloamine butyl hydroxide, sumatriptan, triamcinolonacetonid, and any combination thereof. 
     In a further embodiment, the sucrose fatty acid esters may also be utilized for increased release of sweeteners including for instance the so-called highly potent sweeteners, such as for instance saccharin, cyclamate, aspartame, thaumatin, dihydrocalcones, stevioside, glycyrrhizin or salts or compounds thereof. For increased released of sweetener, the sucrose fatty acids preferable have a content of palmitate of at least 40% such as at least 50%. 
     When including gum base in the formulation sugar alcohols typically constitute from about 5 to about 95% by weight of the tablet, more typically about 20 to about 80% by weight such as 30 to 70% or 30 to 60% by weight of the tablet. 
     In such an embodiment of the invention, the tablet further comprises, beside the already described sugar alcohols, materials selected from the group consisting of bulk sweeteners, flavors, dry-binders, tableting aids, anti-caking agents, emulsifiers, antioxidants, enhancers, absorption enhancers, buffers, high intensity sweeteners, softeners, colors, or any combination thereof. 
     Suitable sugar alcohols typically constitute from about 40 to about 99.9% by weight of the tablet, such as about 80 to about 99% by weight of the tablet. 
     High intensity artificial sweetening agents can also be used alone or in combination with the above sweeteners. Preferred high intensity sweeteners include, but are not limited to sucralose, aspartame, salts of acesulfame, alitame, saccharin and its salts, cyclamic acid and its salts, glycyrrhizin, dihydrochalcones, thaumatin, monellin, stevioside (natural intensity sweetener) and the like, alone or in combination. In order to provide longer lasting sweetness and flavor perception, it may be desirable to encapsulate or otherwise control the release of at least a portion of the artificial sweeteners. Techniques such as wet granulation, wax granulation, spray drying, spray chilling, fluid bed coating, conservation, encapsulation in yeast cells and fiber extrusion may be used to achieve desired release characteristics. Encapsulation of sweetening agents can also be provided using another tablet component such as a resinous compound. 
     Usage level of the artificial sweetener will vary considerably and will depend on factors such as potency of the sweetener, rate of release, desired sweetness of the product, level and type of flavor used and cost considerations. Thus, the active level of artificial sweetener may vary from about 0.001 to about 8% by weight (preferably from about 0.02 to about 8% by weight). When carriers used for encapsulation are included, the usage level of the encapsulated sweetener will be proportionately higher. Combinations of sugar and/or non-sugar sweeteners may be used in the tablet formulation. 
     A tablet according to the invention may, if desired, include one or more fillers/texturisers including as examples, magnesium and calcium carbonate, sodium sulphate, ground limestone, silicate compounds such as magnesium and aluminum silicate, kaolin and clay, aluminum oxide, silicium oxide, talc, titanium oxide, mono-, di- and tri-calcium phosphates, cellulose polymers and combinations thereof. 
       FIGS. 1 a  and 1 b    illustrates an embodiment of an oral tablet  10  according to an embodiment of the invention.  FIG. 1 a    shows the oral tablet from the side and  FIG. 1 b    shows the tablet from above. 
     The composition and the way the tablet is or can be made is described elsewhere in the application and details regarding the structure and functioning of this tablet  10  is also indicated and explained further with reference to  FIG. 4  and  FIG. 5 . 
       FIGS. 2 a  and 2 b    illustrates a two-module version of an oral tablet according to an embodiment of the invention.  FIG. 2 a    shows the oral tablet from the side and  FIG. 2 b    shows the tablet from above. 
     The composition and the way the tablet is made is described elsewhere in the application. 
     Details regarding the structure and functioning of this tablet  10  is also indicated and explained further with reference to  FIGS. 4, 5 and 6 . 
     The intention with this illustration is to give an example of a physical form, which may be applicable within the scope of the invention. The intention is also to illustrate how the term “a module” is understood and applied throughout the description, i.e. that a module is referring to a population of a plurality particles and the particles have been tableted together to form a module. The term module is applied to indicate that one module comprises one population of tableted particles and another module comprises another population of tabled particles. A population of particles in the present context is thus understood to refer to a plurality of particles. A singular particle is thus of course not understood as a module. 
     Modules are typically, but not necessarily, distinguishable by the human eye, in particular if the applied compounds in the different modules are formed by differently colored population of particles or mixtures of particles. 
     The oral tablet  20  comprises an upper module  21  and a lower module  22 . The modules, here in the shapes of layers, are thus physically distinct and each comprises a population of particles which has been tableted. The population of the different modules,  21  and  22 , may typically be different for many purposes. Examples include use for visual conception, for mechanical purposes e.g. providing strength, for medical purposes, and of course also for maximizing the desired effect of non-DC sugar alcohol contained in the tablet. 
     In a preferred embodiment, most of the applied non-DC sugar alcohol(s) is comprised in the upper module  21  and the lower module  22  is mostly comprised of DC-components, i.e. components such as sugar alcohols, fillers, flavors, colors etc. conventionally used for direct compression. In embodiments of the invention, a first module, here the lower module  22  may be regarded and applied as a support module supporting another module, here the upper module  21 . The benefit of this division in the designing of properties is that the module containing the non-DC sugar alcohol particles may comprises substantial amounts of non-DC sugar alcohol particles even in spite of the fact that the modules own mechanical strength is substantially weakened, as the supporting modules structural strength may be designed to ensure that the overall structural strength of the tablet is sufficient to obtain the desired friability and tablet appearance. This multi-modular design approach is of even more interest as the tablets designed according to this principle benefits, in terms of disintegration and dissolving of the tablet matrix during mastication of the tablet, from the increased salivation effect obtained from the applied high content of non-DC sugar alcohol particles in the relatively weak module. 
       FIGS. 3 a  and 3 b    illustrates a three-module version of an oral tablet  30  according to an embodiment of the invention.  FIG. 3 a    shows the oral tablet  30  from the side and  FIG. 3 b    shows the tablet from above. 
     The illustrated tablet  30  comprises an upper module  31 , and intermediate module  33  and a lower module  32 . 
     The upper module  31  may, as explained in relation to the upper module of  FIGS. 2 a  and 2 b   , be formed by a population of particles comprising an effective amount of non-DC sugar alcohol particles. The intermediate layer may comprise further non-DC sugar alcohol particles and or a desired active ingredient. 
     The lower module  32  may comprise substantial amounts of DC-particles such as sugar alcohol(s), fillers, some binder and other relevant ingredients enabling the lower module  32  to form a structural support for at least the upper module  31 . 
       FIG. 4  illustrates a part  40  of a cross-section of one of the oral tablets in  FIG. 1-3 . The part of the oral tablet, illustrated in  FIG. 4  may thus correspond to a view of a part of the upper layers  21  or  31  or a part of the tablet  1 . 
     Such part  40  of a tablet may within the scope of the invention comprise at least two different types of particles, namely non-DC sugar alcohol particles  41  and DC-particles  42 . Preferred but non-limiting non-DC sugar alcohols are non-DC erythritol and non-DC xylitol as these non-DC sugar alcohols have shown effective to obtain the desired effect. The illustrated non-DC particles  41 , although indicated on the figures with the same graphical expression may of course comprise non-DC sugar alcohol particles of the same type, but also comprise a mixture of two or more non-DC sugar alcohol particles. 
     The particles are evenly distributed amongst a plurality of DC particles  42  within the specified module. The DC particles  42 , although indicated in the figure as same type particles may include different types of DC sugar alcohol particles, flavor particles, binders, etc. The intention with the figure is to illustrate that the non-DC sugar alcohol particles  41  in practice have to be homogenously distributed amongst the DC particles  42  in the final oral tablet  40 . It may not be enough that the non-DC particles and DC particles are mixed homogenously at some stage during the preparation of the tableting process. The homogenous mix should preferably be maintained in the final oral tablet  40  in order to promote the desired effect and to obtain a mechanically stable tablet. A further advantageous effect of the evenly distributed non-DC sugar alcohol particles may be obtained through an advantageous and increased salivation during mastication of a tablet. 
     The understanding and conception of the evenly distribution of the non-DC sugar alcohol particles in the relevant tablet module may in practical terms be very difficult to define as such definitions are very difficult to monitor and control during the processing of the tablet but it has been possible to establish an industrial scale process, where the mixture containing the substantial amounts of non-DC sugar alcohol(s) may be established all the way through the process into the final tablet. Such process may e.g. be validated by test manufacturing of a sequence of tablets where the variation of the non-DC sugar alcohol content of the manufactured tablets are determined. 
     It is noted that the non-DC particles  41  forms small sub-areas or sub spaces in the final oral tablet or the relevant module of the final tablet, e.g. the upper modules  21  and  31 . These sub-areas are elsewhere in the present application referred to as discrete non-DC areas and may be formed by single non-DC particles or very small groups of these non-DC particles. These discrete non-DC areas are thus intended to be contained within a matrix formed by DC-sugar alcohol particles or other DC-particles. 
     The non-DC areas, in the present embodiment, the non-DC sugar alcohol particles  41  are thus included in substantial amounts in the tablet and from a mechanical perspective supported and contained by the DC-particles  42  and together forming a matrix which, when chewed, may bring the non-DC sugar alcohol particles  41  into contact with the oral cavity and promote salivation. The promoted salivation, together with relatively weak mechanical structure of the module or tablet comprising the non-DC sugar alcohol particles induces a fast breakup of the tablet and thereby pushes the non-DC particles into contact with the oral cavity in a way which is completely different from compressed tablets made from DC-sugar alcohol particles, such as granulated erythritol or xylitol. 
     The non-DC areas may thus result in induced saliva generation upon mastication of the tablet and also induce and promote a very fast and pleasant dissolving of the tablet matrix when compared to conventional compressed tablets. 
     Active ingredients may be present as both DC and non-DC particles as long as the active ingredient as such does not interfere significant with other compounds. If the active ingredients are non-DC particles, the amount should be kept low enough to ensure the mechanical stability of the tablet or modules or alternatively compensated by relevant DC-particles or binders. It should be noted that such a compensation should be carefully considered as this compensation may both compromise salivation effect and texture/mouthfeel during mastication. 
       FIG. 5  illustrates a part of a cross-section of one of the oral tablets in  FIG. 1-3 . The part of the oral tablet, illustrated in  FIG. 5  may thus correspond a view of a part of the upper modules  21  or  31  or the tablet  1 . 
     In terms of components applied, the tablet part illustrated in  FIG. 5  may largely correspond to the above-described embodiment of  FIG. 4 , but now the tablet part comprises larger sized non-DC particles  51  containing in a compression of particles of DC particles  52 . 
     The intention with the present  FIG. 5  is merely to indicate that in particular the non-DC sugar alcohol particles may be larger in size than the DC particles and it is also noted in this context that the use of larger sized non-DC sugar alcohol particles may indeed increase the obtained salivation or the desired effect. 
       FIG. 6  illustrates a particular transition in a tablet  60  with two adjacent modules according to an embodiment of the invention. The presently illustrated part of such tablet may e.g. refer to the transition between the modules  21  and  22  of the tablet  20  as seen in  FIG. 2 a   . The tablet  60  comprises non-DC sugar alcohol particles  61  and DC particles  62  in one module and another module comprising DC particles  63 . The understanding of a module is here easily conceivable as the population of non-DC sugar alcohol particles  61  and DC particles  62  forms one module and the population of DC particles  63  forms another module. Often, the compositions of the DC sugar alcohol particles  62  and the DC sugar alcohol particles  63  may be different, depending on the specific circumstances. 
     Again, in relation to  FIG. 5  and  FIG. 6 , active ingredients may be present as both DC and non-DC particles as long as the active ingredient as such does not interfere significant with other compounds. If the active ingredients are non-DC particles, the amount should be kept low enough to ensure the mechanical stability of the tablet or modules or alternatively compensated by relevant DC-particles or binders. It should be noted that such a compensation should be carefully considered as this may compensation may both compromise salivation effect and texture/mouthfeel during mastication. 
     Particles comprising gum base, may also be present both as non-DC and DC particles, although DC-particles comprising gum base are highly preferred over non-DC gum base-containing particles. When applying particles comprising gum base, these particles are preferably but not necessarily included in a supporting module as DC particles  63  e.g. with mixed with sugar alcohol particles  63  as illustrated in  FIG. 6 . 
     The above illustrated modules are all designed as layers. It is stressed that other shapes of modules may be applicable within the scope of the invention. Non-limiting examples are modules having a sphere shape, diamond shape, oval shape, cone shape, etc. All the relevant shapes must of course be adapted to fit the tableting process according to known measures within the art. 
     EXAMPLES 
     Part A: Examples 1-21x. Preparation of Two-Layer Tablets 
       
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1x 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for bi-layer tablets containing active 
               
               
                 ingredients. Amount are given in wt-% of the respective layer of tablet. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Ex1x 
                 Ex2x 
                 Ex3x 
                 Ex4x 
                 Ex5x 
                 Ex6x 
                 Ex7x 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 First layer (wt %) 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
               
               
                 DC Isomalt 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium Stearate 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Binder HPC 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Second layer (wt %) 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 including ACT 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 DC Maltitol 
                 93.75 
                 94.55 
                 94.749 
                 89.75 
                 94.74 
                 94.25 
                 94.25 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium Stearate 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
            
           
           
               
            
               
                 ACT 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Chlorpheniramine 
                 1 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Nicotine 
                 — 
                 0.2 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Oxytocin 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.001 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Prednisone 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 5 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Desmopressin 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.01 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Diphenhydramine 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.5 
                 — 
               
               
                 Benzydaminhydrochlorid 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.5 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 2x 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for bi-layer tablets containing active 
               
               
                 ingredients. Amount are given in wt-% of the respective layer of tablet. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Ex8x 
                 Ex9x 
                 Ex10x 
                 Ex11x 
                 Ex12x 
                 Ex13x 
                 Ex14x 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 First layer (wt %) 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
               
               
                 DC Isomalt 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium Stearate 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Binder HPC 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Second layer (wt %) 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 including ACT 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 DC Xylitol 
                 93.75 
                 94.55 
                 94.749 
                 89.75 
                 94.74 
                 94.25 
                 94.25 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium Stearate 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
            
           
           
               
            
               
                 ACT 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Chlorpheniramine 
                 1 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Nicotine 
                 — 
                 0.2 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Oxytocin 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.001 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Prednisone 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 5 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Desmopressin 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.01 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Diphenhydramine 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.5 
                 — 
               
               
                 Benzydaminhydro 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.5 
               
               
                 chlorid 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 3x 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for bi-layer tablets containing active 
               
               
                 ingredients. Amount are given in wt-% of the respective layer of tablet. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
               
               
                   
                 15x 
                 16x 
                 17x 
                 18x 
                 19x 
                 20x 
                 21x 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 First layer (wt %) 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Non-DC 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
               
               
                 Erythritol 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 DC Isomalt 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Stearate 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Binder HPC 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Second layer (wt %) 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 including ACT 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 DC Isomalt 
                 93.75 
                 94.55 
                 94.749 
                 89.75 
                 94.74 
                 94.25 
                 94.25 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Stearate 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
            
               
                 ACT 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Chlorpheniramine 
                 1 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Nicotine 
                 — 
                 0.2 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Oxytocin 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.001 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Prednisone 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 5 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Desmopressin 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.01 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Diphen- 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.5 
                 — 
               
               
                 hydramine 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Benzydamin- 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 0.5 
               
               
                 hydrochlorid 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The compositions indicated in the above Tables 1-3x are each processed into corresponding two-layer tablets with compositions as outlined in examples 1-21x. 
     For each example 1-21x the raw materials are sieved with a 1600 micron sieve and then weighed into the proper amount according to the exampled compositions of Tables 1-3x. 
     For each layer the weighed amounts are then added to a Turbula mixer in a stainless steel container and blended at 50 rpm for 5 minutes. MgSt was added after 4 minutes of blending. 
     It is noted that the active ingredient ACT is present in the second layer in all examples. It should be noted that the seven exemplified buccal active ingredients are in no way limiting and it is also noted that it is possible to administer the active ingredients via the first layer. The shown way of administering the active ingredient via the second layer, i.e. the layer not containing the non-DC sugar alcohol, represents a very advantageous design in terms of the desired technical effect. It is also noted that each tablet may also contain more than one active ingredient and it is also noted that different active ingredients in that case may be distributed in different layers. It is also noted that more than two layers may also be applied within the scope of the invention, and one advantageous design e.g. may include two layers, a first and a second layer as specified herein but now added with an intermediate layer comprising one of the applied active ingredients. It should also be noted that the term layer in relation to the present embodiment may elsewhere in this application be referred to as a module. In terms of active ingredients, it is noted that some active ingredients may advantageously be applied on a tablet which is not multi-modular. 
     The mixtures are then tableted by means of a Piccola RIVA DC-SC-041-2 or a Fette 3090i. 
     The applied molds have circular cross sections with diameters of 16 mm and are hollowed to produce tablets, which are concave and/or curved. Evidently, other mold size and shapes may be applied within the scope of the invention. 
     The resulting tablets according to Examples 1-21x are then obtained by tableting with a suitable pressure force. 
     For each tablet of examples 1-21x, the second layer as outlined in the above table is pressed initially at a first relatively low pressure. The blended composition of the so-called first layer is then fed to the mold and a final two-layer tablet is then compressed at higher pressure than the pressure applied on the first layer, thereby producing final two-layer tablets according to Examples 1-21x. It is noted that the final two-layer tablets of examples 1-21x are 1.8 gram tablets and that the first layer of the tablets weighs 0.9 and the second layer of the tablets weighs 0.9 gram. 
     A specification of relevant compounds applied in the examples explained above are listed below. 
     HPC: Hydroxy propyl cellulose. Klucel Nutra D from Ashland 
     Non DC Erythritol: Zerose 16952 from Cargill 
     DC Xylitol—Xylitab 200 from Dupont 
     DC Isomalt—Isomalt DC 101 from Beneo Paltinit 
     DC Maltitol—Sweetpearl 300 DC from Roquette 
     The above two-layer Examples 1-21x were evaluated according to mechanical strength and the important salivation was evaluated as explained with reference to  FIG. 7 . 
     It was noted that the use of DC maltitol, DC Xylitol and DC Isomalt in the second layer was regarded sufficient and an attractive mean for carrying the respective active ingredients from a mechanical perspective, which is important due to the fact that the high load of non-DC-sugar alcohol in the first layer will weaken the first layer. 
     In terms of the salivation effect, it is noted that the swallowability is promoted through the use of the non-DC sugar alcohols. To many users swallowing of an oral tablet containing an active ingredient is difficult or impossible and the intended administration of the active ingredient in question is considered extremely difficult. It is also noted that fast melting tablets are often equally difficult and unpleasant for a user. The present chewable tablets are increasing the ability of a user to get the benefit of the active ingredient as the inventive oral tablet promotes salivation to a degree that makes the user able to accept swallowing the active ingredient when the tablet is masticated and the active ingredient is in the mouth. The motivation for swallowing the masticated oral tablet is greatly increased by the use of the non-DC sugar alcohol. As the presently chosen active ingredients are directed to an intended buccal absorption, the chewable tablets may thus promote salivation and the buccal absorption. 
     More important than the above is that storage time in the mucosa may be prolonged due to the obtained increased salivation and also the improved mouthfeel/taste masking without annoying the user. A prolonged storage time in the mouth increases the uptake, in particular if the tablet matrix dissolves fast. 
     A fast dissolving of the tablet matrix containing the active ingredients furthermore makes the active ingredients available faster for uptake, while at the same time obtaining improved taste masking from conventional sweeteners and flavors. 
     It is furthermore believed that the HPC binder applied in the present embodiments also interacts as a mucoadhesive and thereby promotes the buccal uptake 
       FIG. 7  illustrates a measuring of the salivation effect related to the above-mentioned Example 7x in different variants, where different non-DC sugar alcohols have been applied in a tablet according to Example 7x without an active ingredient and where the non-DC sugar alcohol has been exchanged with alternatives to the non-DC erythritol applied in Example 7x. Sorbitol is applied as a reference, representative DC sugar alcohol. 
     ISX1 refers to a non-DC xylitol variant of Example 7x with same amount of non-DC sugar alcohol, 
     ISX2 refers to a non-granulated sorbitol variant of Example 7x with same amount of non-DC sugar alcohol, 
     ISX3 refers to a non-DC isomalt variant of Example 7x with same amount of non-DC sugar alcohol, 
     ISX4 refers to a non-DC erythritol corresponding to Example 7x, 
     ISX5 refers to a non-DC mannitol variant of Example 7x with same amount of non-DC sugar alcohol and 
     ISX6 refers to a non-DC maltitol variant of Example 7x with same amount of non-DC sugar alcohol. 
     The saliva generation as measured with reference to  FIG. 7  and the associated examples is defined in the description as a definition with reference to the measuring method. 
     The results of the measured saliva generation are illustrated in  FIG. 7 , where saliva generation in measured in grams as a function of time (minutes). 
     It is noted that the saliva generation from all non-DC sugar alcohols are impressive in the beginning, but it is also noted that saliva generation over time is no less than astonishing in relation to ISX4, i.e. the non-DC erythritol example 7x. It is thus noted that the salivation effect is increased a very long time after the major part of non-DC erythritol based tablet has been swallowed or collected during the measurement. 
     Part B: Examples 1-38. Preparation of Two-Layer Tablets 
       
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1A 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for first layer of bi-layer tablets containing 
               
               
                 variants of non-DC sugar alcohols. Amounts are given in wt-%  
               
               
                 of the respective layer of the tablet. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Raw material 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 (wt %) First layer 
                 Ex1 
                 Ex2 
                 Ex3 
                 Ex4 
                 Ex5 
                 Ex6 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Non-DC Xylitol 
                 50 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Sorbitol** 
                 — 
                 50 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Non-DC Isomalt 
                 — 
                 — 
                 50 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 50 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Non-DC Mannitol 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 50 
                 — 
               
               
                 Non-DC 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 50 
               
               
                 Maltitol 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 DC Isomalt 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Stearate 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Binder HPC 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Resistance to 
                 160 
                 &gt;350 
                 190 
                 142 
                 90 
                 174 
               
               
                 crunch [N]* 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Friability 
                 0.74 
                 0.25 
                 0.63 
                 1.30 
                 1.45 
                 1.00 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 *Method limitation means maximum resistance to crunch which can be measured up to 350N. 
               
               
                 **non-granulated sorbitol. 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1B 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for first layer of bi-layer tablets containing 
               
               
                 variants of non-DC sugar alcohols. Amounts are given in wt-% 
               
               
                 of the respective layer of the tablet. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Raw material 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 (wt %) First 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 layer 
                 Ex7 
                 Ex8 
                 Ex9 
                 Ex10 
                 Ex11 
                 Ex12 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Non-DC Xylitol 
                 50 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Sorbitol** 
                 — 
                 50 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Non-DC Isomalt 
                 — 
                 — 
                 50 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Non-DC 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 50 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 Erythritol 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Non-DC Mannitol 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 50 
                 — 
               
               
                 Non-DC 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 — 
                 50 
               
               
                 Maltitol 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Sorbitol 
                 44.25 
                 44.25 
                 44.25 
                 44.25 
                 44.25 
                 44.25 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Stearate 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Binder HPC 
                 0.5 
                 0.5 
                 0.5 
                 0.5 
                 0.5 
                 0.5 
               
               
                 Resistance to 
                 190 
                 &gt;350 
                 270 
                 170 
                 120 
                 210 
               
               
                 crunch [N]* 
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 Friability 
                 0.65 
                 0.12 
                 0.87 
                 1.13 
                 1.25 
                 0.88 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 *Method limitation means maximum resistance to crunch which can be measured up to 350N. 
               
               
                 **non-granulated sorbitol. 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for the second layer of bi-layered tablets. 
               
               
                 Amounts are given in wt-% of the respective layer of the tablet. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Rw material 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 (wt %) Second layer 
                 Ex1-12 
                 Ex13-24 
                 Ex25-36 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 DC Maltitol 
                 94.75 
                 — 
                 — 
               
               
                 DC Xylitol 
                 — 
                 94.75 
                 — 
               
               
                 DC Isomalt 
                 — 
                 — 
                 94.75 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium Stearate 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for bi-layered tablets containing  
               
               
                 variants of DC-sugar alcohols. Amounts are given in wt-%  
               
               
                 of the respective layer of the tablet. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                 Raw material (wt %) 
                   
                   
               
               
                 First layer 
                 Ex37 
                 Ex38 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 50 
                 50 
               
               
                 DC Isomalt 
                 43.75 
                 43.75 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium Stearate 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Binder HPC 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 DC Erythritol 
                 94.75 
                 — 
               
               
                 DC Mannitol 
                 — 
                 94.75 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium Stearate 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 Resistance to crunch [N]* 
                 140 
                 182 
               
               
                 Friability 
                 1.25 
                 1.68 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 *Method limitation means maximum resistance to crunch which can be measured up to 350N. 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Process Flow 
     The compositions indicated in the above Tables 1A and 1B and 2 are each processed into two-layer tablets with compositions as outlined in examples 1-12, 13-24 and 25-36. In other words, the examples 1-12 are bi-layer tablet with a first layer according to Table 1A and 1B and the second layer is based primarily on DC maltitol. In examples 13-24, the second layer is primarily based on DC Xylitol. In examples 25-36, the second layer is primarily based on DC isomalt as shown in Table 2. 
     The composition of Table 3 is likewise processed into corresponding two-layer tablets of each of the compositions as indicated examples 37 and 38. 
     For each example 1-38 the raw materials are sieved with a 1600 micron sieve and then weighed into the proper amount according to the exampled compositions of Tables 1A to 3. 
     The weighed amounts are then added to a Turbula mixer in a stainless-steel container and blended at 50 rpm for 5 minutes. MgSt was added after 4 minutes of blending. 
     The mixtures are then tableted by means of a Piccola RIVA DC-SC-041-2 or a Fette 3090i. 
     The applied molds have circular cross sections with diameters of 16 mm and are hollowed to produce tablets, which are concave and/or curved. Evidently, other mold size and shapes may be applied within the scope of the invention. 
     The resulting tablets according to Examples 1-38 are then obtained by tableting with a suitable pressure force. 
     For each tablet of examples 1-38, the second layer as outlined in Table 2 and referred to as the second layer in Table 3 is pressed initially at a first relatively low pressure. The blended composition of the so-called first layer, i.e. compositions of Tables 1A and 1B and the first layer of Table 3 is then fed to the mold and a final two-layer tablet is then compressed at higher pressure than the pressure applied on the first layers, thereby producing final two-layer tablets according to Examples 1-38. It is noted that the final two-layer tablets of examples 1-38 are 1.8 grams tablets and that the first layer of the tablets weighs 0.9 and the second layer of the tablets weighs 0.9 gram. 
     A specification of relevant compounds applied in the examples explained above are listed below. 
     HPC: Hydroxy propyl cellulose. Klucel Nutra D from Ashland 
     Non-DC Xylitol: Xivia C from Dupont 
     Non-granulated Sorbitol from PharmSorbidex from Cargill 
     Non-DC Isomalt: Isomalt GS from Beneo Paltinit 
     Non-DC Mannitol: Pearlitol from Roquette 
     Non-DC Maltitol: Maltisorb. P200 from Roquette 
     Non-DC Erythritol: Zerose 16952 from Cargill 
     DC Erythritol—Zerose 16966 from Cargill 
     DC Xylitol—Xylitab 200 from Dupont 
     DC Isomalt—Isomalt DC 101 from Beneo Paltinit 
     DC Mannitol—Pearlitol SD200 from Roquette 
     DC Maltitol—Sweetpearl 300 DC from Roquette 
     Examples 39-41 
       
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 3B 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Compositions for 1.8 gram oral tablets.  
               
               
                 Amounts are given in wt-% of the tablet. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Rw material 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (wt %) 1 layer 
                 Ex39 
                 Ex40 
                 Ex41 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 DC Isomalt 
                 45 
                 35 
                 — 
               
               
                   
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 48.75 
                 43.75 
                 48.75 
               
               
                   
                 DC CaCO3 
                 — 
                 15 
                 45 
               
               
                   
                 Flavor 
                 4 
                 4 
                 4 
               
               
                   
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                   
                 Magnesium 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                   
                 Stearate 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Binder HPC 
                 1 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     All ingredients were received in powder form. 
     DC Isomalt—Isomalt DC 101 from Beneo Paltinit 
     Non-DC Erythritol: Zerose 16952 from Cargill 
     HPC: Hydroxy propyl cellulose. Klucel Nutra D from Ashland 
     DC CaCO3: Scoralite 97 PVP from Scora 
     Process Flow 
     For each of the examples 39-41 the raw materials are sieved with a 1600 micron sieve and then weighed into the proper amount according to the exampled compositions of Table 3B. 
     For each example the weighed amounts are then added to a Turbula mixer in a stainless-steel container and blended at 50 rpm for 4 minutes and then adding magnesium stearate and blending one additional minute. 
     The resulting tablets according to Examples 39-41 are then obtained by tableting the mixtures by means of a Piccola RIVA DC-SC-041-2. A Fette 3090i may also applied. 
     Evaluation 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 3C 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Sensory evaluation of Examples 13-18. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Total  
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 sensory 
                   
                 Initial 
               
               
                   
                 experience 
                   
                 Watering 
               
               
                   
                 Good/ 
                   
                 effect 
               
               
                   
                 Accept- 
                 Suitable 
                 1-5 
               
               
                   
                 able(Acc)/ 
                 Fast dissolving 
                 1 low 
               
               
                 Ex 
                 Poor 
                 Chewable tablet 
                 5 high 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 13 
                 Acc 
                 A bit hard initial chew, disintegrate with 
                 4 
               
               
                   
                   
                 crunchy feeling, many big particles for a 
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 long time 
                   
               
               
                 14 
                 Poor 
                 Unacceptable hard chew—not chewable 
                 2 
               
               
                   
                   
                 or complete dissolvable within the first 
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 30 seconds. 
                   
               
               
                 15 
                 Poor 
                 Very hard and difficult to disintegrate. 
                 3 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Saliva increases but with many big non- 
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 dissolved particles though the first 30 sec. 
                   
               
               
                 16 
                 Good 
                 Nice crunchy fast dissolving tablet 
                 5 
               
               
                 17 
                 Poor 
                 Soft initial chew, different mouth feel. 
                 2 
               
               
                   
                   
                 Sticky feeling. Does not dissolve fast 
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 enough or provide pleasant watering 
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 effect 
                   
               
               
                 18 
                 Poor 
                 Hard initial chew. Very crumble and 
                 4 
               
               
                   
                   
                 sandy feeling. Salivation generation but 
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                 sandy liquid feeling 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The above two-layer Examples 13-18 were evaluated according to three parameters by a test panel. 
     Two of the parameters were suitability as a chewable tablet and one parameter was the perceived watering effect. Due to the more complex nature of a two-layer tablet two further parameters were evaluated, namely resistance to crunch and friability. 
     It was first of all noted that the watering effect was considered relatively high for examples 13, 15, 16 and 18, i.e. the examples based on non-DC Xylitol, non-DC Isomalt, non-DC Erythritol and non-DC Maltitol. The watering effect is considered to be representative or equal to the elsewhere described salivation effect. 
     The test panel clearly indicated that the overall chewing process and the mouthfeel was no less than impressive in relation to Example 16 based on non-DC Erythritol. It was also noted that the test panel identified non-DC Xylitol of example 13 and non-DC Maltitol of example 18 as having an impressive watering effect when compared to e.g. the sorbitol-based example. 
     As a supplement to the sensory evaluation, the resistance to crunch and friability was measured and indicated in the Examples 13-24, i.e. with reference to a bi-layer tablet with a first layer as indicated in Table 1A and Table 1B and a second layer based primarily on DC xylitol as indicated in Table 2. 
     The resistance to crunch is determined according to European Pharmacopoeia 9.1, test method 2.9.8. by using a pharmaceutical resistance to crunch tester model Pharma Test type PTB 311. 
     Friability is measured according to European Pharmacopoeia 9.1, test method 2.9.7. by using a pharmaceutical friability-tester PTF 10E from Pharma Test. 
       FIG. 7  illustrates a measuring of the salivation effect related to the above-mentioned Examples 13-18, where different non-DC sugar alcohols have been applied. Sorbitol is applied as a reference as a representative DC sugar alcohol. 
     ISX1 refers to the non-DC xylitol example 13, 
     ISX2 refers to the sorbitol example 14, 
     ISX3 refers to the non-DC isomalt example 15, 
     ISX4 refers to the non-DC erythritol example 16, 
     ISX5 refers to the non-DC mannitol example 17 and 
     ISX6 refers to the non-DC maltitol example 18. 
     The saliva generation as measured with reference to  FIG. 7  and the associated examples is defined in the description as a definition with reference to the measuring method. 
     The results of the measured saliva generation are illustrated in  FIG. 7 , where saliva generation in measured in grams as a function of time (minutes). 
     It is noted that the saliva generation from all non-DC sugar alcohols are impressive in the beginning, but it is also noted that saliva generation over time is no less than astonishing in relation to ISX4, i.e. the non-DC erythritol example 16. It is thus noted that the salivation effect is increased a very long time after the major part of non-DC erythritol based tablet has been swallowed or collected during the measurement. It is also observed that the relatively low initial perceived salivation effect of example 14, i.e. the sorbitol-based example is confirming the sensory evaluation as mentioned above. 
     Examples 42-43. Preparation of Two-Layer Tablets with an ODT Tablet 
       
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for bi-layered tablets where the  
               
               
                 layer comprising Pearlitol Flash is an ODT layer. The  
               
               
                 ratio of layer 1 to layer 2 is 55:45. The tablet weight is  
               
               
                 1.5 g. Hence the weight of layer 1 is 0.825 g whereas  
               
               
                 the weight of layer 2 is 0.675 g. Amounts are  
               
               
                 given in wt-% of the respective layer of the tablet. 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                 Raw material 
                   
                   
               
               
                 (wt %) 
                   
                   
               
               
                 First layer 
                 Ex42 
                 Ex43 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 50 
                 50 
               
               
                 DC Isomalt 
                 — 
                 44.75 
               
               
                 Pearlitol Flash** 
                 44.75 
                 — 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 2 
                 2 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
                 0.25 
               
               
                 Magnesium Stearate 
                 2 
                 2 
               
               
                 Binder HPC 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Raw material 
                   
                   
               
               
                 (wt %)  
                   
                   
               
               
                 Second layer 
                 Ex42 
                 Ex43 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Pearlitol Flash** 
                 — 
                 98.8 
               
               
                 DC Xylitol 
                 98.8 
                 — 
               
               
                 Flavor 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                 HIS 
                 0.2 
                 0.2 
               
               
                 Magnesium Stearate 
                 1 
                 1 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 **Pearlitol Flash is a trademark of Roquette and is a compound that allies robustness with rapid disintegration and consists of mannitol and starch, specifically developed for disintegrating properties, melting instantaneously in the mouth into a creamy, slightly sweet texture. 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 4B 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet composition for bi-layered tablets where layer 2  
               
               
                 is an ODT layer. The ratio of layer 1 to layer 2 is 75:25. The  
               
               
                 tablet weight is 1.2 g. Hence the weight of layer 1 is 0.90 g  
               
               
                 whereas the weight of layer 2 is 0.30 g. Amounts are given 
               
               
                 in wt-% of the respective layer of the tablet. The ODT layer  
               
               
                 was seen to disintegrate within 60 seconds. 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Raw material 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (wt %) First layer 
                 Ex43B 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 55 
               
               
                   
                 DC Isomalt 
                 34.75 
               
               
                   
                 Flavor 
                 4 
               
               
                   
                 HIS 
                 0.25 
               
               
                   
                 Magnesium Stearate 
                 1 
               
               
                   
                 Binder HPC 
                 5 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Raw material 
                   
               
               
                   
                 (wt %) Second layer 
                 Ex43B 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 DC Mannitol 
                 85 
               
               
                   
                 Micro Crystalline 
                 5 
               
               
                   
                 Cellulose (MCC) 
                   
               
               
                   
                 Binder CrosPovidone 
                 8 
               
               
                   
                 Flavor 
                 1 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 HIS 
                 1 
                 5 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Examples 44-46 Preparation with Different Levels of Non-DC Sugar Alcohol 
       
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for bi-layered tablets.  
               
               
                 The ratio of layer 1 to layer 2 is 55:45. The tablet w 
               
               
                 eight is 1.5 g. Hence the weight of layer 1 is 0.825 g 
               
               
                 whereas the weight of layer 2 is 0.675 g. Amounts  
               
               
                 are given in wt-% of the respective layer of the tablet. 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Rw material 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (wt %) 1 layer 
                 Ex44 
                 Ex45 
                 Ex46 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 5 
                 50 
                 82 
               
               
                   
                 DC Isomalt 
                 90.8 
                 43.8 
                 9.8 
               
               
                   
                 Flavor 
                 3 
                 3 
                 3 
               
               
                   
                 HIS 
                 0.2 
                 0.2 
                 0.2 
               
               
                   
                 Binder HPC 
                 1 
                 3 
                 5 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Raw material 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (wt %) Second 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 layer 
                 Ex44 
                 Ex45 
                 Ex46 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 DC Xylitol 
                 91.9 
                 91.9 
                 91.9 
               
               
                   
                 DC CaCO3 
                 5 
                 5 
                 5 
               
               
                   
                 Flavor 
                 3 
                 3 
                 3 
               
               
                   
                 HIS 
                 0.1 
                 0.1 
                 0.1 
               
               
                   
                 Resistance to 
                 140 
                 100 
                 55 
               
               
                   
                 crunch [N]* 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Friability 
                 0.70 
                 1.98 
                 5.8 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 *Method limitation means maximum resistance to crunch which can be measured up to 350N. 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Examples 47-50 Preparation with Different Levels of Non-DC Sugar Alcohol 
       
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 6 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for bi-layered tablets. The  
               
               
                 ratio of layer 1 to layer 2 is 55:45. The tablet weight  
               
               
                 is 1.5 g. Hence the weight of layer 1 is 0.825 g 
               
               
                 whereas the weight of layer 2 is 0.675 g. Amounts 
               
               
                 are given in wt-% of the respectivel ayer of the tablet. 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Rw material 
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (wt %) 1 layer 
                 Ex47 
                 Ex48 
                 Ex49 
                 Ex50 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 DC Erythritol 
                 0 
                 20 
                 30 
                 50 
               
               
                   
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 50 
                 30 
                 20 
                 0 
               
               
                   
                 DC Isomalt 
                 43.8 
                 43.8 
                 43.8 
                 43.8 
               
               
                   
                 Flavor 
                 3 
                 3 
                 3 
                 3 
               
               
                   
                 HIS 
                 0.2 
                 0.2 
                 0.2 
                 0.2 
               
               
                   
                 Binder HPC 
                 3 
                 3 
                 3 
                 3 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Raw material 
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (wt %) Second 
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 layer 
                 Ex47 
                 Ex48 
                 Ex49 
                 Ex50 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 DC Xylitol 
                 91.9 
                 91.9 
                 91.9 
                 91.9 
               
               
                   
                 DC CaCO3 
                 5 
                 5 
                 5 
                 5 
               
               
                   
                 Flavor 
                 3 
                 3 
                 3 
                 3 
               
               
                   
                 HIS 
                 0.1 
                 0.1 
                 0.1 
                 0.1 
               
               
                   
                 Resistance to 
                 77 
                 97 
                 109 
                 133 
               
               
                   
                 crunch [N]* 
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Friability 
                 2.01 
                 0.73 
                 0.53 
                 0.45 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 *Method limitation means maximum resistance to crunch which can be measured up to 350N. 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Process Flow 
     The compositions indicated in the above Tables 4, 4B, 5 and 6 are each processed into two-layer tablets with compositions as outlined in examples 42-50 and 43B. 
     For each example 42-50 and 43B, the raw materials are sieved with a 1600-micron sieve and then weighed into the proper amount according to the exampled compositions. 
     The weighed amounts are then added to a Turbula mixer in a stainless-steel container and blended at 50 rpm for 5 minutes. If applicable, Magnesium stearate was added after 4 minutes of blending. 
     The mixtures are then tableted by means of a Piccola RIVA DC-SC-041-2 or a Fette 3090i. 
     The applied molds have circular cross sections with diameters of 16 mm and are hollowed to produce tablets, which are concave and/or curved. Evidently, other mold size and shapes may be applied within the scope of the invention. 
     The resulting tablets according to Examples 42-50 and 43B are then obtained by tableting with a suitable pressure force. 
     For each tablet of examples 44-50, the second layer is pressed initially at a first relatively low pressure. The blended composition of the so-called first layer is then fed to the mold and a final two-layer tablet is then compressed at higher pressure than the pressure applied on the first layers, thereby producing final two-layer tablets according to Examples 44-50. For examples 42-43 and 43B, the first layer is pressed initially at a first relatively low pressure The blended composition of the so-called second layer is then fed to the mold and a final two-layer tablet is then compressed at higher pressure than the pressure applied on the first layers, thereby producing final two-layer tablets according to Examples 42-43 and 43B. 
     It is noted that the final two-layer tablets of examples 42-43 are 1.5 grams tablets and the ratio of layer 1 to layer 2 is 55:45. The tablet weight is 1.5 g. Hence the weight of layer 1 is 0.825 g whereas the weight of layer 2 is 0.675 g. 
     It is noted that the final two-layer tablets of example 43B are 1.2 grams tablets and the ratio of layer 1 to layer 2 is 75:25. The tablet weight is 1.2 g. Hence the weight of layer 1 is 0.90 g whereas the weight of layer 2 is 0.30 g. 
     It is noted that the final two-layer tablets of examples 44-50 are 1.5 grams tablets and the ratio of layer 1 to layer 2 is 55:45. The tablet weight is 1.5 g. Hence the weight of layer 1 is 0.825 g whereas the weight of layer 2 is 0.675 g. 
     A specification of relevant compounds applied in the examples explained above are listed below. 
     HPC: Hydroxy propyl cellulose. Klucel Nutra D from Ashland 
     Non-DC Xylitol: Xivia C from Dupont 
     Non-granulated Sorbitol from PharmSorbidex from Cargill 
     Non-DC Isomalt: Isomalt GS from Beneo Paltinit 
     Non-DC Mannitol: Pearlitol from Roquette 
     Non-DC Maltitol: Maltisorb. P200 from Roquette 
     Non-DC Erythritol: Zerose 16952 from Cargill 
     DC Erythritol—Zerose 16966 from Cargill 
     DC Xylitol—Xylitab 200 from Dupont 
     DC Isomalt—Isomalt DC 101 from Beneo Paltinit 
     DC Mannitol—Pearlitol SD200 from Roquette 
     DC Maltitol—Sweetpearl 300 DC from Roquette 
     DC CaCO3: Scoralite 97 PVP from Scora 
     Pearlitol Flash is a trademark from Roquette 
     Micro Crystalline Cellulose (MCC): Avicel PH-105 from FMC 
     CrosPovidone: Kollidon CL-SF from BASF 
     Test Set-Up 
     The above two-layer Examples 42-50 and 43B were evaluated with respect to watering effect by a test panel in a time-intensity evaluation set-up. The watering effect is the perceived watering effect by the test panel, i.e. the overall impression of watering effect upon oral administration and commencement of the test. 
     The test set-up was composed of 8 test persons in a test panel with 2 repetitions of each variant. Each of the test persons were healthy individuals appointed on an objective basis according to specified requirements. The sensory analysis was performed according to ISO 4121-2003 in testing conditions following ISO 8589. The result is an average of the results of the 8 individuals for 2 repetitions, giving a total of 16 measurements for each variant. 
     The 8 test individuals were instructed to swallow saliva before the test was commenced and was not allowed to swallow during testing. The test individuals chewed the samples with a frequency of about 60 chews pr. minute. After 30 seconds, the saliva generated was collected and the weight of the saliva was noted. Before a new test was conducted, the oral cavity was rinsed with water and a time gap of 4 minutes before next test was complied with. Each sample was tested twice by each individual in the test. Hence a total of 16 test results were generated for each sample. Each test individual was allowed to test 6 samples in a test series. At least 30 minutes gap between each test series was complied with. 
     The test individuals indicated watering effect intensity on a scale from 0 to 10 where 10 indicates the highest watering effect. The watering effect is measured as a function of time in seconds. 
     The ODT layers of Examples 42, 43 and 43B were seen to disintegrate within seconds, such as within 90 seconds and lower. 
     Due to the more complex nature of a two-layer tablet two further parameters were evaluated, namely resistance to crunch and friability. The resistance to crunch and friability was measured and indicated in the Examples 44-50. 
     The resistance to crunch is determined according to European Pharmacopoeia 9.1, test method 2.9.8. by using a pharmaceutical resistance to crunch tester model Pharma Test type PTB 311. 
     Friability is measured according to European Pharmacopoeia 9.1, test method 2.9.7. by using a pharmaceutical friability-tester PTF 10E from Pharma Test. 
     Watering Effect 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 7 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Results of watering effect based on Examples 44-46.  
               
               
                 The values indicate watering effect intensity on a  
               
               
                 scale from 0 to 10 where 10 is the highest score on 
               
               
                 watering effect. The watering effect is measured as  
               
               
                 a function of time in seconds. Samples were  
               
               
                 chewed for 30 seconds without swallowing. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Watering effect 
                 Ex44 
                 Ex45 
                 Ex46 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 15 s 
                 6.33 
                 7.36 
                 7.66 
               
               
                   
                 20 s 
                 7.38 
                 8.37 
                 8.53 
               
               
                   
                 25 s 
                 8.36 
                 8.93 
                 9.38 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The results clearly indicate that a high amount of non-DC erythritol (Ex46) is beneficial with respect to watering effect. A low value of non-DC erythritol (Ex44) is less beneficial with respect to watering effect. It is noted that even a slight difference in these values are perceptible. The result also clearly indicates that the watering effect for all samples was higher as a function of time. The value of 9.38 obtained after only 25 seconds for Ex46 was close to the highest perceptible level. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 8 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Results of watering effect based on Examples 47-50.  
               
               
                 The values indicate watering effect intensity on a  
               
               
                 scale from 0 to 10 where 10 is the highest score on  
               
               
                 watering effect. The watering effect is measured as  
               
               
                 a function of time in seconds. Samples chewed for  
               
               
                 30 seconds without swallowing. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Watering effect 
                 Ex47 
                 Ex48 
                 Ex49 
                 Ex50 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                  5 s 
                 1.85 
                 1.98 
                 1.95 
                 1.82 
               
               
                   
                 10 s 
                 3.67 
                 3.99 
                 3.52 
                 3.43 
               
               
                   
                 20 s 
                 6.74 
                 6.16 
                 6.18 
                 5.73 
               
               
                   
                 25 s 
                 8.03 
                 7.42 
                 7.61 
                 7.64 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The results indicate that a high amount of non-DC erythritol (Ex47) is beneficial with respect to watering effect. A low value of non-DC erythritol (Ex50) is less beneficial with respect to watering effect, but still acceptable. It is noted that even a slight difference in these values are perceptible. The result also clearly indicates that the watering effect for all samples was higher as a function of time. It was a surprise that the values increased as much as it did with time. 
     Examples 51-59 Preparation of Powders with Different Particle Size Distribution 
       
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 9 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Test comparing different particle size distributions  
               
               
                 of selected non-DC sugar alcohols. The particles  
               
               
                 were sieved through a sieve of a mess diameter 
               
               
                 allowing particles of less than 500 microns to pass  
               
               
                 and particles of more than 500 microns to be collected.  
               
               
                 The two fractions were used for further analysis. “non- 
               
               
                 DC” without particles size indications was the same  
               
               
                 raw material that was not subject of sieving. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                 Raw material powder 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Ex51 
                 Isomalt non-DC &lt;500 microns 
               
               
                   
                 Ex52 
                 Isomalt non-DC &gt;500 microns 
               
               
                   
                 Ex53 
                 Isomalt non-DC 
               
               
                   
                 Ex54 
                 Xylitol non-DC &lt;500 microns 
               
               
                   
                 Ex55 
                 Xylitol non-DC &gt;500 microns 
               
               
                   
                 Ex56 
                 Xylitol non-DC 
               
               
                   
                 Ex57 
                 Erythritol non-DC &lt;500 microns 
               
               
                   
                 Ex58 
                 Erythritol non-DC &gt;500 microns 
               
               
                   
                 Ex59 
                 Erythritol non-DC 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     In this example, powders were tested with respect to total weight of saliva generated upon oral administration. 
     Non-DC Xylitol: Xivia C from Dupont 
     Non-DC Isomalt: Isomalt GS from Beneo Paltinit 
     Non-DC Erythritol: Zerose 16952 from Cargill 
     The particles was sieved through a sieve of a mess diameter allowing particles of less than 500 microns to pass and particles of more than 500 microns to be collected. The two fractions were used for further analysis. “non-DC” without particles size indications was the same raw material as indicated above that was not subject of sieving. 
     Test Set-Up 
     The above powder Examples 51-59 were evaluated with respect to total weight of saliva generated upon oral administration by a test panel. 
     The test set-up was composed of 8 test persons with 2 repetitions. The test persons were healthy individuals appointed on an objective basis according to specified requirements. The sensory analysis was performed according to ISO 4121-2003 in testing conditions following ISO 8589. 
     The various fractions were tested for total weight of saliva generated according to the following procedure: 
     The fractions were tested in a continuous procedure without interruptions in order to obtain reproducible values. A fraction of 1.0 g powder was weighted in a container. In this test, the test individuals were instructed to swallow saliva before the test was commenced and it was not allowed to swallow during the test. The powder was placed in the first ⅓ of the tongue, the head was held forward and it was not allowed to swallow during the test. The test individuals chewed the powder with a frequency of about 60 chews pr. minute. After 60 seconds, the saliva generated was collected and the weight of the saliva was noted. Before a new test was conducted, the oral cavity was rinsed with water and a time gap of 4 minutes before next test was complied with. A series of 2 tests were conducted for the test individual. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 10 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Results of the total weight of saliva generated based  
               
               
                 on the preparations in Examples 51-59. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Weight of 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
                 Ex 
               
               
                 saliva gram 
                 51 
                 52 
                 53 
                 54 
                 55 
                 56 
                 57 
                 58 
                 59 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Average 
                 3.9 
                 4.0 
                 3.9 
                 4.1 
                 4.5 
                 4.3 
                 4.4 
                 5.1 
                 4.5 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The results can be divided into two major findings: 
     Firstly, the results clearly show that non-DC erythritol provided the best result on saliva generation (Ex59), compared to non-DC xylitol (Ex56) and even better than non-DC isomalt (Ex53). It is noted that although non-DC erythritol showed the best result on the total generation of saliva during the test period, both the result of xylitol and isomalt was on a very advantageous level. 
     Secondly, the results also very beneficially show that for all three non-DC sugar alcohols, a particle size of more than 500 microns was especially beneficial on saliva generation compared to less than 500 microns. The best results were obtained for non-DC erythritol (Ex58) with a particles size distribution of more than 500 microns, with xylitol of a lower value (Ex55) and isomalt with the lowest (Ex52), but still very advantageous value. 
     Examples 60-62 Preparation of Powders with Different Sugar Alcohols 
       
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 11 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Test comparing selected non-DC sugar alcohols. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                 Raw material powder 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Ex60 
                 Isomalt non-DC 
               
               
                   
                 Ex61 
                 Xylitol non-DC 
               
               
                   
                 Ex62 
                 Erythritol non-DC 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     In this example, different sugar alcohols powders were tested with respect to total weight of saliva generated upon oral administration. 
     Non-DC Xylitol: Xivia C from Dupont 
     Non-DC Isomalt: Isomalt GS from Beneo Paltinit 
     Non-DC Erythritol: Zerose 16952 from Cargill 
     Test Set-Up 
     The above powder Examples 60-62 were evaluated with respect to total weight of saliva generated upon oral administration by a test panel. 
     The test set-up was composed of 8 test persons in a test panel with 2 repetitions of each variant. Each of the test persons were healthy individuals appointed on an objective basis according to specified requirements. The sensory analysis was performed according to ISO 4121-2003 in testing conditions following ISO 8589. The result is an average of the results of the 8 individuals for 2 repetitions, giving a total of 164 measurements of each variant. 
     The different samples were tested for total weight of saliva generated according to the following procedure: 
     A fraction of 1.0 g powder was weighted in a container. In this test, 8 test individual was instructed to swallow saliva before the test was commenced. The powder was placed in the first ⅓ of the tongue, the head was held forward and it was not allowed to swallow during the test. The test individuals chewed the powder with a frequency of about 60 chews pr. minute. After 60 seconds, the saliva generated was collected and the weight of the saliva was noted. Before a new test was conducted, the oral cavity was rinsed with water and a time gap of 4 minutes before next test was complied with. A series of 2 tests were conducted for the test individual. Hence a total of 16 test samples were generated for each raw material powder. Each test individual was allowed to test 6 samples in a test series. At least 30 minutes gap between each test series was required. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 12 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Results of the total weight of saliva generated 
               
               
                 based on the preparations in Examples 60-62. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Weight of 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 saliva gram 
                 Ex60 
                 Ex61 
                 Ex62 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Average 
                 4.1 
                 4.2 
                 4.4 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The results clearly show that non-DC erythritol provided the best result (Ex62), compared to non-DC xylitol (Ex61) and even better than non-DC isomalt (Ex60). It is noted that although non-DC erythritol showed the best result on the total generation of saliva during the test period, both the result of xylitol and isomalt was on a very advantageous level. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 13 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Test comparing different particle size distributions  
               
               
                 of selected non-DCsugar alcohols. The particles  
               
               
                 from a commercial grade non-DC sugar alcohol was 
               
               
                 sieved through a sieve of a mess diameter allowing  
               
               
                 particles of less than 500 microns to pass and particles  
               
               
                 of more than 500 microns to be collected. The two  
               
               
                 fractions were used for further analysis. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                 Raw material powder 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Ex63 
                 Isomalt non-DC &lt;500 microns 
               
               
                   
                 Ex64 
                 Isomalt non-DC &gt;500 micron 
               
               
                   
                 Ex65 
                 Erythritol non-DC &lt;500 microns 
               
               
                   
                 Ex66 
                 Erythritol non-DC &gt;500 microns 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     In this example, powders were tested with respect to total weight of saliva generated upon oral administration by different particle sizes of sugar alcohols. 
     Non-DC Isomalt: Isomalt GS from Beneo Paltinit 
     Non-DC Erythritol: Zerose 16952 from Cargill 
     The particles was sieved through a sieve of a mess diameter allowing particles of less than 500 microns to pass and particles of more than 500 microns to be collected. The two fractions were used for further analysis. “non-DC” without particles size indications was the same raw material as indicated above that was not subject of sieving. 
     Test Set-Up 
     The above powder Examples 63-66 were evaluated with respect to total weight of saliva generated upon oral administration by a test panel. 
     The test set-up was composed of 8 test persons in a test panel with 2 repetitions for each variant. Each of the test persons were healthy individuals appointed on an objective basis according to specified requirements. The sensory analysis was performed according to ISO 4121-2003 in testing conditions following ISO 8589. The result is an average of the results of the 8 individuals for 2 repetitions, giving a total of 16 measurements of each variant. 
     The different samples were tested for total weight of saliva generated according to the following procedure: 
     A fraction of 1.0 g powder was weighted in a container. In this test, 8 test individual was instructed to swallow saliva before the test was commenced. The powder was placed in the first ⅓ of the tongue, the head was held forward and it was not allowed to swallow during the test. The test individuals chewed the powder with a frequency of about 60 chews pr. minute. After 60 seconds, the saliva generated was collected and the weight of the saliva was noted. Before a new test was conducted, the oral cavity was rinsed with water and a time gap of 4 minutes before next test was complied with. A series of 2 tests were conducted for the test individual. Hence a total of 16 test samples were generated for each raw material powder. Each test individual was allowed to test 6 samples in a test series. At least 30 minutes gap between each test series was required. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 14 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Results of the total weight of saliva generated based  
               
               
                 on the preparations in Examples 63-66. 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Weight of 
                   
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 saliva gram 
                 Ex63 
                 Ex64 
                 Ex65 
                 Ex66 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Average 
                 4.0 
                 4.3 
                 4.2 
                 4.6 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The results can be divided into two major findings: 
     Firstly, the results very beneficially showed that for the two non-DC sugar alcohols, a particle size of more than 500 microns was especially beneficial compared to less than 500 microns. The best results were obtained for non-DC erythritol (Ex66) with a particles size distribution of more than 500 microns and isomalt with the lowest value (Ex64), but still acceptable value. 
     Secondly, the result showed that the generation of saliva was highest for non-DC erythritol compared to non-DC isomalt. 
     Examples 67-69. Preparation of Two-Layer Tablets with CaCO3 
       
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 15 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for bi-layered tablets with 
               
               
                 different levels of CaCO3. The ratio of layer 1 to  
               
               
                 layer 2 is 55:45. The tablet weight is 1.5 g. Hence the 
               
               
                 weight of layer 1 is 0.825 g whereas the weight of layer  
               
               
                 2 is 0.675 g. Amounts are given in wt-% of the  
               
               
                 respective layer of the tablet. 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Raw material 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (wt %) 1 layer 
                 Ex67 
                 Ex68 
                 Ex69 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
               
               
                   
                 Sorbitol** 
                 37.4 
                 32.4 
                 27.4 
               
               
                   
                 Flavor 
                 2.5 
                 2.5 
                 2.5 
               
               
                   
                 HIS 
                 0.1 
                 0.1 
                 0.1 
               
               
                   
                 Binder Gum Arabic 
                 5 
                 5 
                 5 
               
               
                   
                 DC CaCO3 
                 5 
                 10 
                 15 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Raw material 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 (wt %) Second layer 
                 Ex67 
                 Ex68 
                 Ex69 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 DC Xylitol 
                 50 
                 50 
                 50 
               
               
                   
                 Sorbitol** 
                 42.9 
                 37.9 
                 32.9 
               
               
                   
                 Flavor 
                 2 
                 2 
                 2 
               
               
                   
                 HIS 
                 0.1 
                 0.1 
                 0,1 
               
               
                   
                 DC CaCO3 
                 5 
                 10 
                 15 
               
               
                   
                 Resistance to crunch [N]* 
                 145 
                 115 
                 107 
               
               
                   
                 Friability 
                 1.08 
                 1.45 
                 1.87 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 *Method limitation means maximum resistance to crunch which can be measured up to 350N. 
               
               
                   
                 **non-granulated sorbitol. 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The compositions indicated in the above Table 15 are each processed into two-layer tablets with compositions as outlined in examples 67-69 and processed according to the process flow of examples 42-50. The compositions of examples 67-69 were further evaluated with respect to watering effect by a test panel in a time-intensity evaluation set-up according to the test set-up of examples 42-50. The compositions are particularly suitable for whitening effects. 
     Examples 70-72. Preparation of Two-Layer Tablets with Clean Label/Natural Ingredients 
       
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 16 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Oral tablet compositions for bi-layered tablets with natural  
               
               
                 ingredients. The ratio of layer 1 to layer 2 is 55:45. The tablet  
               
               
                 weight is 1.5 g. Hence the weight of layer 1 is 0.825 g whereas 
               
               
                 the weight of layer 2 is 0.675 g. Amounts are given in 
               
               
                 wt-% of the respective layer of the tablet. 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Raw material 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 (wt %) 1 layer 
                 Ex70 
                 Ex71 
                 Ex72 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Non-DC Erythritol 
                 50 
                 0 
                 0 
               
               
                 DC Erythritol 
                 37.35 
                 0 
                 0 
               
               
                 Non-DC Xylitol 
                 0 
                 50 
                 0 
               
               
                 DC Xylitol 
                 0 
                 37.35 
                 0 
               
               
                 Non-DC Organic cane sugar 
                 0 
                 0 
                 50 
               
               
                 DC Organic Tapioca Dextrose 
                 0 
                 0 
                 37.35 
               
               
                 Natural Flavors 
                 2.5 
                 2.5 
                 2.5 
               
               
                 Stevia Glycosid 
                 0.15 
                 0.15 
                 0.15 
               
               
                 Binder acacia gum 
                 5 
                 5 
                 0 
               
               
                 DC CaCO3 
                 5 
                 5 
                 5 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Raw material 
                   
                   
                   
               
               
                 (wt %) Second layer 
                 Ex70 
                 Ex71 
                 Ex72 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 DC Erythritol 
                 92.5 
                 0 
                 0 
               
               
                 DC Xylitol 
                 0 
                 92.5 
                 0 
               
               
                 DC Organic Tapioca Dextrose 
                 0 
                 0 
                 92.5 
               
               
                 Natural Flavors 
                 2.5 
                 2.5 
                 2.5 
               
               
                 DC CaCO3 
                 5 
                 5 
                 5 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     The compositions indicated in the above Table 16 are each processed into two-layer tablets with compositions as outlined in examples 70-72 and processed according to the process flow of examples 42-50. The compositions of examples 70-72 were further evaluated with respect to watering effect by a test panel in a time-intensity evaluation set-up according to the test set-up of examples 42-50.