Patent Publication Number: US-7589246-B2

Title: Production of aromatics from methane

Description:
PRIORITY CLAIM 
     This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/921,724, filed Apr. 4, 2007, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference. 
    
    
     FIELD 
     This invention relates to a process for producing aromatic hydrocarbons from methane and, in particular, from natural gas. 
     BACKGROUND 
     Aromatic hydrocarbons, particularly benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and xylenes, are important commodity chemicals in the petrochemical industry. Currently, aromatics are most frequently produced from petroleum-based feedstocks by a variety of processes, including catalytic reforming and catalytic cracking. However, as the world supplies of petroleum feedstocks decrease, there is a growing need to find alternative sources of aromatic hydrocarbons. 
     One possible alternative source of aromatic hydrocarbons is methane, which is the major constituent of natural gas and biogas. World reserves of natural gas are constantly being upgraded and more natural gas is currently being discovered than oil. Because of the problems associated with transportation of large volumes of natural gas, most of the natural gas produced along with oil, particularly at remote places, is flared and wasted. Hence the conversion of alkanes contained in natural gas directly to higher hydrocarbons, such as aromatics, is an attractive method of upgrading natural gas, providing the attendant technical difficulties can be overcome. 
     A large majority of the processes currently proposed for converting methane to liquid hydrocarbons involve initial conversion of the methane to synthesis gas, a blend of H 2  and CO. However, production of synthesis gas is capital and energy intensive and hence routes that do not require synthesis gas generation are preferred. 
     A number of alternative processes have been proposed for directly converting methane to higher hydrocarbons. One such process involves catalytic oxidative coupling of methane to olefins followed by the catalytic conversion of the olefins to liquid hydrocarbons, including aromatic hydrocarbons. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,336,825 discloses a two-step process for the oxidative conversion of methane to gasoline range hydrocarbons comprising aromatic hydrocarbons. In the first step, methane is converted to ethylene and minor amounts of C 3  and C 4  olefins in the presence of free oxygen using a rare earth metal promoted alkaline earth metal oxide catalyst at a temperature between 500° C. and 1000° C. The ethylene and higher olefins formed in the first step are then converted to gasoline range liquid hydrocarbons over an acidic solid catalyst containing a high silica pentasil zeolite. 
     However, oxidative coupling methods suffer from the problems that they involve highly exothermic and potentially hazardous methane combustion reactions and they generate large quantities of environmentally sensitive carbon oxides. 
     A potentially attractive route for upgrading methane directly into higher hydrocarbons, particularly ethylene, benzene and naphthalene, is dehydroaromatization or reductive coupling. This process typically involves contacting the methane with a catalyst comprising a metal, such as rhenium, tungsten or molybdenum, supported on a zeolite, such as ZSM-5, at high temperature, such as 600° C. to 1000° C. Frequently, the catalytically active species of the metal is the zero valent elemental form or a carbide or oxycarbide. 
     For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,727,206 discloses a process for producing liquids rich in aromatic hydrocarbons by contacting methane at a temperature between 600° C. and 800° C. in the absence of oxygen with a catalyst composition comprising an aluminosilicate having a silica to alumina molar ratio of at least 5:1, said aluminosilicate being loaded with (i) gallium or a compound thereof and (ii) a metal or a compound thereof from Group VIIB of the Periodic Table. 
     In addition, U.S. Pat. No. 5,026,937 discloses a process for the aromatization of methane which comprises the steps of passing a feed stream, which comprises over 0.5 mole % hydrogen and 50 mole % methane, into a reaction zone having at least one bed of solid catalyst comprising ZSM-5, gallium and phosphorus-containing alumina at conversion conditions which include a temperature of 550° C. to 750° C., a pressure less than 10 atmospheres absolute (1000 kPaa) and a gas hourly space velocity of 400 to 7,500 hr −1 . 
     Moreover, U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,239,057 and 6,426,442 disclose a process for producing higher carbon number hydrocarbons, e.g., benzene, from low carbon number hydrocarbons, such as methane, by contacting the latter with a catalyst comprising a porous support, such as ZSM-5, which has dispersed thereon rhenium and a promoter metal such as iron, cobalt, vanadium, manganese, molybdenum, tungsten or a mixture thereof. After impregnation of the support with the rhenium and promoter metal, the catalyst is activated by treatment with hydrogen and/or methane at a temperature of about 100° C. to about 800° C. for a time of about 0.5 hr. to about 100 hr. The addition of CO or CO 2  to the methane feed is said to increase the yield of benzene and the stability of the catalyst. 
     However, the successful application of reductive coupling to produce aromatics on a commercial scale requires the solution of a number of serious technical challenges. For example, the reductive coupling process is both endothermic and thermodynamically limited. Thus the cooling effect caused by the reaction lowers the reaction temperature sufficiently to greatly reduce the reaction rate and total thermodynamic conversion if significant make-up heat is not provided to the process. 
     Moreover, the process tends to produce carbon and other non-volatile materials that accumulate on the catalyst resulting in reduced activity and potentially undesirable selectivity shifts. In addition, at the high temperatures involved in the process, the active metal species (MoC x , WC x , etc) on the catalyst may migrate, agglomerate or change phase, again resulting in undesirable declines in conversion and selectivity. The catalyst is therefore subjected to frequent oxidative regeneration to remove the carbon and other non-volatile materials that have accumulated on the catalyst and possibly to redistribute the active metal species. However, depending on the composition of the catalyst, regeneration in an oxidative environment may have certain unwanted ancillary effects. For example, the metal on the catalyst may be converted from a catalytically active elemental or carburized state to a less active oxidized state. Also, following regeneration, the catalyst may exhibit enhanced activity for coke deposition and related hydrogen generation. Thus there is interest in developing reductive coupling processes in which catalyst regeneration is effected under non-oxidative conditions. 
     For example, Japanese Kokai Patent Publication No. 2003-26613, published Jan. 29, 2003, describes a method of making aromatic hydrocarbons and hydrogen from lower hydrocarbon containing at least 60 mol % of methane, in the presence of a catalyst, such as ZSM-5 supporting molybdenum, tungsten or rhenium, in which the catalyst periodically and alternately switched between a production cycle, in which the catalyst is contacted with the lower hydrocarbon, and regeneration cycle, in which the catalyst is contacted with hydrogen. Typically, the production cycle is 1 to 20 minutes, preferably about 1 to 10 minutes and the regeneration cycle is 1 to 30 minutes, preferably about 5 to 20 minutes. 
     In addition, International Patent Publication No. WO2006/011568, published Feb. 2, 2006, describes a method of manufacturing aromatic hydrocarbons and hydrogen from a raw material gas containing a lower hydrocarbon, in which the a mixture of the raw material gas and hydrogen gas is brought into contact with a catalyst, such as a molybdenum- and/or rhodium-supported metallosilicate, at a high temperature, such as 750° C., and periodically, during regeneration cycles, the supply of the aforementioned raw material gas is stopped while the supply of hydrogen gas is maintained. The constant supply of hydrogen during both production and regeneration cycles is alleged to decrease the ratio of the regeneration time to the production cycle time. 
     U.S. Patent Application Publication No 2003/0083535 discloses a process for aromatization of a methane-containing feed, in which a dehydroaromatization catalyst is circulated between a reactor system and a regenerator system, where the catalyst is contacted with different regeneration gases, including O 2 , H 2 , and H 2 O, at different times to regenerate different portions of catalyst. The percentage of catalyst contacting each regeneration gas is controlled to maintain the reactor system and regeneration system under a heat balance regime. The reactor system includes a fluidized bed of catalyst in a riser reactor, and the regeneration system includes a second fluidized bed of catalyst maintained in a bubbling bed reactor. After passage through the regeneration system, the hot regenerated catalyst is returned to the reactor system by way of a transfer system, which may include a reduction vessel for increasing the activity of the regenerated catalyst by contacting the catalyst in a fluidized bed with a reducing gas stream including hydrogen and/or methane. 
     The invention described herein seeks to provide an improved methane aromatization process in which catalyst regeneration is effected with a hydrogen-containing gas. 
     SUMMARY 
     In one aspect, the present invention resides in a process for converting methane to higher hydrocarbons including aromatic hydrocarbons, the process comprising: 
     (a) supplying a feedstock comprising methane and a particulate catalytic material to a reaction zone; 
     (b) operating said reaction zone under reaction conditions effective to convert at least a portion of said methane to said higher hydrocarbon(s) and to deposit carbonaceous material on the particulate catalytic material causing catalyst deactivation; 
     (c) removing at least a portion of said deactivated particulate catalytic material from said reaction zone; 
     (d) heating at least a portion of the removed particulate catalytic material to a temperature of about 700° C. to about 1200° C. by direct and/or indirect contact with combustion gases produced by combustion of a supplemental fuel; 
     (e) regenerating said heated portion of said particulate catalytic material with a hydrogen-containing gas in a regeneration zone under conditions effective to convert at least a portion of the carbonaceous material thereon to methane; and 
     (f) recycling at least a portion of said catalytic particulate material from (e) to said reaction zone. 
     In a further aspect, the present invention resides in a process for converting methane to higher hydrocarbons including aromatic hydrocarbons, the process comprising: 
     (a) supplying a feedstock containing methane and a catalytic particulate material to a reaction zone; 
     (b) operating said reaction zone under reaction conditions effective to convert at least a portion of said methane to said higher hydrocarbon(s) and to deposit carbonaceous materials on the catalyst causing catalyst deactivation; 
     (c) removing at least part of said deactivated catalytic particulate material from said reaction zone; 
     (d) heating a first portion of the removed catalytic particulate material to a temperature of about 700° C. to about 1200° C. by direct and/or indirect contact with combustion gases produced by combustion of a supplemental fuel; 
     (e) regenerating said heated first portion of the catalytic particulate material with a hydrogen containing gas in a first regeneration zone under conditions, including a first pressure, effective to convert at least part of the carbonaceous materials on the catalytic particulate material to methane; 
     (f) transferring a second portion of the removed catalytic particulate material from (c) or (e) to a second regeneration zone; 
     (g) regenerating said second portion of the catalytic particulate material with a hydrogen containing gas in said second regeneration zone under conditions, including a second pressure different from said first pressure, effective to convert at least part of the carbonaceous materials on the catalytic particulate material to methane; and 
     (h) recycling at least a portion of said regenerated catalytic particulate material from 
     (e) and at least a portion of said catalytic particulate material from (g) to said reaction zone. 
     In one embodiment, said reaction zone is a moving bed reaction zone and conveniently is operated with an inverse temperature profile. Conveniently, said feedstock further comprises at least one of CO, CO 2 , H 2 , H 2 O, and/or O 2 . Conveniently, said removed particulate catalytic material is heated to a temperature of about 800° C. to about 1000° C., such as about 850° C. to about 950° C., in (d). Conveniently, said conditions in said regenerating (e) include a pressure of at least 100 kPaa, such between about 150 kPaa and about 700 kPaa. Conveniently, said conditions in said regenerating (g) include a pressure of at least 500 kPaa, such between about 1000 kPaa and about 5000 kPaa. Conveniently, said regenerating (e) and said regenerating (g) are conducted in separate regeneration zones. 
     In one embodiment, said reaction conditions in said reaction zone in (b) are non-oxidizing conditions. Conveniently, said reaction conditions in said reaction zone in (b) include a temperature of about 400° C. to about 1200° C., a pressure of about 1 kPa-a to about 1000 kPa-a, and a weight hourly space velocity of about 0.01 hr −1  to about 1000 hr −1 . 
     In one embodiment, said catalytic particulate material is a dehydrocyclization catalyst comprising a metal or compound thereof on an inorganic support. Conveniently, said catalytic particulate material comprises at least one of molybdenum, tungsten, rhenium, a molybdenum compound, a tungsten compound, a zinc compound, and a rhenium compound on ZSM-5, silica or an aluminum oxide. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  is a diagram of a process for converting methane to higher hydrocarbons according to a first embodiment of the invention. 
         FIG. 2  is a diagram of a process for converting methane to higher hydrocarbons according to a second embodiment of the invention. 
         FIG. 3  is graph of methane production against temperature in the temperature programmed hydrogen treatment of the coked Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst of Example 6 in a plug flow reactor at a temperature ramp rate of 5° C./min. 
         FIG. 4  is a graph plotting coke concentration (wt %) as a function of regeneration time in the hydrogen regeneration of the coked Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst of Example 7 at 850° C. and various hydrogen partial pressures. 
         FIGS. 5   a  and  5   b  show methane conversion (%) and benzene+toluene selectivity while the regeneration temperatures were increased from 875° C. to 925° C. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS 
     As used herein the term “higher hydrocarbon(s)” means hydrocarbon(s) having more than one carbon atom per molecule, oxygenate having at least one carbon atom per molecule, e.g., ethane, ethylene, propane, propylene, benzene, toluene, xylenes, naphthalene, and/or methyl naphthalene; and/or organic compound(s) comprising at least one carbon atom and at least one non-hydrogen atom, e.g., methanol, ethanol, methylamine, and/or ethylamine. 
     As used herein the term “aromatic hydrocarbon(s)” means molecules containing one or more aromatic rings. Examples of aromatic hydrocarbons are benzene, toluene, xylenes, naphthalene, and methylnaphthalenes. 
     The terms “coke” and “carbonaceous material” are used herein interchangeably to mean carbon containing materials, which are essentially non-volatile solids at the reaction conditions, with a low hydrogen content relative to carbon content (such as a H/C molar ration of less than 0.8; most probably less than 0.5). These may include crystalline graphite, graphitic sheets, graphitic fragments, amorphous carbon, or other carbon containing structures which are essentially non-volatile solids at the reaction conditions. When reference is made to hard coke, harder coke, or refractory coke; this is meant to be the types of coke either due to structure or location that are harder to remove with the reactant (typically oxygen or hydrogen) being utilized to convert the coke to a gaseous species. 
     As used herein the term “deactivation” of a catalyst means the loss of catalytic activity and/or selectivity over time. A catalyst is deactivated if its catalytic activity or selectivity is at least 1% lower, alternatively, at least 5% lower, alternatively, at least 10% lower, alternatively, at least 15% lower, alternatively, at least 20% lower, alternatively, at least 25% lower, alternatively, at least 30% lower, alternatively, at least 35% lower, alternatively, at least 40% lower, alternatively, at least 45% lower, alternatively, at least 50% lower, alternatively, at least 55% lower, alternatively, at least 60% lower, alternatively, at least 65% lower, alternatively, at least 70% lower, alternatively, at least 75% lower, alternatively, at least 80% lower, alternatively, at least 85% lower, alternatively, at least 90% lower, alternatively, at least 95% lower, or alternatively, at least 100% lower, than the catalyst activity of the fresh catalyst or the regenerated catalyst. Not intended to be limited by any theory, we believe that catalyst deactivation may be a phenomenon in which the structure and/or state of the catalyst change, leading to the loss of active sites on the catalyst&#39;s surface and thus causing a decrease in the catalyst&#39;s performance. For example, catalyst deactivation may due to coke formation, active site blockage, or dealumination of an aluminosilicate molecular sieve due to steaming. 
     As used herein the term “moving bed” reactor means a zone or vessel with contacting of solids and gas flows such that the superficial gas velocity (U) is below the velocity required for dilute-phase pneumatic conveying of solid particles in order to maintain a solids bed with void fraction below 95%. A moving-bed reactor may operate under several flow regimes including settling- or moving packed-bed regime (U&lt;U mf ), bubbling regime (U mf &lt;U&lt;U mb ), slugging regime (U mb &lt;U&lt;U c ), transition to and turbulent fluidization regime (U c &lt;U&lt;U tr ), and fast-fluidization regime (U&gt;U tr ). These different fluidization regimes have been described in, for example, Kunii, D., Levenspiel, O., Chapter 3 of  Fluidization Engineering,  2 nd  Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1991 and Walas, S. M., Chapter 6 of  Chemical Process Equipment , Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1990. 
     As used herein the term “settling bed” means a zone or vessel wherein particulates contact with gas flows such that the superficial gas velocity (U) is below the minimum velocity required to fluidize the solid particles, the minimum fluidization velocity (U mf ), U&lt;U mf , in at least a portion of the reaction zone, and/or operating at a velocity higher than the minimum fluidization velocity while maintaining a gradient in gas and/or solid property (such as, temperature, gas or solid composition, etc.) axially up the reactor bed by using reactor internals to minimize gas-solid back-mixing. Description of the minimum fluidization velocity is given in, for example Chapter 3 of “Fluidization Engineering,” D. Kunii and O. Levenspiel, 2 nd  Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1991 and Chapter 6 of “Chemical Process Equipment,” S. M. Walas, Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, 1990, the entirety of which are incorporated by reference. 
     As used herein the term “fluidized bed” reactor means a zone or vessel with contacting of solids and gas flows such that the superficial gas velocity (U) is sufficient to fluidize solid particles (i.e., above the minimum fluidization velocity U mf ) and is below the velocity required for dilute-phase pneumatic conveying of solid particles in order to maintain a solids bed with void fraction below 95%. As used herein the term “cascaded fluid-beds” means a series arrangement of individual fluid-beds such that there can be a gradient in gas and/or solid property (such as, temperature, gas or solid composition, pressure etc.) as the solid or gas cascades from one fluid-bed to another. Locus of minimum fluidization velocity is given in, for example, the Kunii and Walas publications noted above. 
     As used herein the term “riser” reactor means a zone or vessel (such as, vertical cylindrical pipe) used for net upwards transport of solids in fast-fluidization or pneumatic conveying fluidization regimes. Fast fluidization and pneumatic conveying fluidization regimes are characterized by superficial gas velocities (U) greater than the transport velocity (U tr ). Fast fluidization and pneumatic conveying fluidization regimes are also described in the Kunii and Walas publications noted above. 
     As used herein, references to heating by “indirect contact” with combustion gases are meant to include heat transfer across a heat transfer surface and/or use of a heat transfer medium (gas, liquid, or solid) that is heated by the combustion gases and gives up its heat to the catalytic particulate material. 
     The present invention provides a process for producing aromatic hydrocarbons by contacting a feedstock containing methane, typically together with H 2 , H 2 O, O 2 , CO and/or CO 2 , with a particulate dehydrocyclization catalyst in a reaction zone under conditions effective to convert the methane to aromatic hydrocarbons and hydrogen. As the reaction proceeds, coke builds up on the catalyst thereby reducing the activity or selectivity of the catalyst or selectivity and hence a portion of the coked catalyst is continuously or intermittently withdrawn from the reaction zone and passed to a separate regeneration zone, where the coked catalyst is contacted with a hydrogen-containing regeneration gas. Since the dehydrocyclization reaction is endothermic, heat is supplied to the coked catalyst withdrawn from the reaction zone to raise its temperature to the desired regeneration temperature, typically about 700° C. to about 1200° C., by direct and/or indirect contact with combustion gases produced by combustion of a supplemental fuel. Part of the heated coked catalyst may then be returned to the reaction zone to provide heat to the dehydrocyclization reaction, while the remainder of the heated catalyst is contacted with the hydrogen-containing regeneration gas in the regeneration zone under conditions such that at least part of the coke on the catalyst is converted to methane. The regenerated catalyst is then returned to the reaction zone. 
     In one embodiment, the regeneration is conducted by withdrawing two or more portions of the coked catalyst from the reaction zone, supplying heat to the catalyst portions and contacting the heated catalyst portions with a hydrogen-containing gas in separate regeneration zones operated under conditions such that the hydrogen partial pressure in at least two of the regeneration zones are different. 
     In addition, the invention provides a process for utilizing the hydrogen generated as a by-product of the dehydrocyclization reaction and in particular to a process for converting at least part of the hydrogen to higher value products. 
     Feedstock 
     Any methane-containing feedstock can be used in the process of the invention but in general the present process is intended for use with a natural gas feedstock. Other suitable methane-containing feedstocks include those obtained from sources such as coal beds, landfills, agricultural or municipal waste fermentation, and/or refinery gas streams. 
     Methane-containing feedstocks, such as natural gas, typically contain carbon dioxide and ethane in addition to methane. Ethane and other aliphatic hydrocarbons that may be present in the feed can of course be converted to desired aromatics products in the dehydrocyclization step. In addition, as will be discussed below, carbon dioxide can also be converted to useful aromatics products either directly in the dehydrocyclization step or indirectly through conversion to methane and/or ethane in the hydrogen rejection step. 
     Nitrogen and/or sulfur impurities are also typically present in methane-containing streams may be removed, or reduced to low levels, prior to use of the streams in the process of the invention. In an embodiment, the feed to the dehydrocyclization step contains less than 100 ppm, for example less than 10 ppm, such as less than 1 ppm each of nitrogen and sulfur compounds. 
     In addition to methane, the feed to the dehydrocyclization step may contain at least one of hydrogen, water, oxygen, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide in order to assist in coke mitigation. These additives can be introduced as separate co-feeds or can be present in the methane stream, such as, for example, where the methane stream is derived from natural gas containing carbon dioxide. Other sources of carbon dioxide may include flue gases, LNG plants, hydrogen plants, ammonia plants, glycol plants and phthalic anhydride plants. 
     In one embodiment, the feed to the dehydrocyclization step contains carbon dioxide and comprises about 90 to about 99.9 mol %, such as about 97 to about 99 mol %, methane and about 0.1 to about 10 mol %, such as about 1 to about 3 mol %, CO 2 . In another embodiment, the feed to the dehydrocyclization step contains carbon monoxide and comprises about 80 to about 99.9 mol %, such as about 94 to about 99 mol %, methane and about 0.1 to about 20 mol %, such as about 1 to about 6 mol %, CO. In a further embodiment, the feed to the dehydrocyclization step contains steam and comprises about 90 to about 99.9 mol %, such as about 97 to about 99 mol %, methane and about 0.1 to about 10 mol %, such as about 1 to about 5 mol %, steam. In yet a further embodiment, the feed to the dehydrocyclization step contains hydrogen and comprises about 80 to about 99.9 mol %, such as about 95 to about 99 mol %, methane and about 0.1 to about 20 mol %, such as about 1 to about 5 mol %, hydrogen. 
     The feed to the dehydrocyclization step can also contain higher hydrocarbons than methane, including aromatic hydrocarbons. Such higher hydrocarbons can be recycled from the hydrogen rejection step, added as separate co-feeds or can be present in the methane stream, such as, for example, when ethane is present in a natural gas feed. Higher hydrocarbons recycled from the hydrogen rejection step typically include one-ring aromatics and/or paraffins and olefins having predominately 6 or less, such as 5 or less, for example 4 or less, typically 3 or less carbon atoms. In general, the feed to the dehydrocyclization step contains less than 5 wt %, such as less than 3 wt %, of C 3 + hydrocarbons. 
     Dehydrocyclization 
     In the dehydrocyclization step of the present process, the methane containing feedstock is contacted with a particulate dehydrocyclization catalyst under conditions, normally non-oxidizing conditions and typically reducing conditions, effective to convert the methane to higher hydrocarbons, including benzene and naphthalene. The principal net reactions involved are as follows:
 
2CH 4     C 2 H 4 +2H 2    (Reaction 1)
 
6CH 4     C 6 H 6 +9H 2    (Reaction 2)
 
10CH 4     C 10 H 8 +16H 2    (Reaction 3)
 
     Carbon monoxide and/or dioxide that may be present in the feed improves catalyst activity and stability by facilitating reactions such as:
 
CO 2 +coke→2CO   (Reaction 4)
 
but negatively impacts equilibrium by allowing competing net reactions, such as;
 
CO 2 +CH 4     2CO+2H 2    (Reaction 5).
 
     Any dehydrocyclization catalyst effective to convert methane to aromatics can be used in the present process, although generally the catalyst will include a metal component, particularly a transition metal or compound thereof, on an inorganic support. Conveniently, the metal component is present in an amount between about 0.1% and about 20%, such as between about 1% and about 10%, by weight of the total catalyst. Generally, the metal will be present in the catalyst in elemental form or as a carbide species. 
     Suitable metal components for the catalyst include calcium, magnesium, barium, yttrium, lanthanum, scandium, cerium, titanium, zirconium, hafnium, vanadium, niobium, tantalum, chromium, molybdenum, tungsten, manganese, rhenium, iron, ruthenium, cobalt, rhodium, iridium, nickel, palladium, copper, silver, gold, zinc, aluminum, gallium, silicon, germanium, indium, tin, lead, bismuth and transuranium metals. Such metal components may be present in elemental form or as metal compounds, such as oxides, carbides, nitrides and/or phosphides, and may be employed alone or in combination. Platinum and osmium can also be used as one of the metal component but, in general, are not preferred. 
     The inorganic support may be either amorphous or crystalline and in particular may be an oxide, carbide or nitride of boron, aluminum, silicon, phosphorous, titanium, scandium, chromium, vanadium, magnesium, manganese, iron, zinc, gallium, germanium, yttrium, zirconium, niobium, molybdenum, indium, tin, barium, lanthanum, hafnium, cerium, tantalum, tungsten, or other transuranium elements. In addition, the support may be a porous material, such as a microporous crystalline material or a mesoporous material. As used herein the term “microporous” refers to pores having a diameter of less than 2 nanometers, whereas the term “mesoporous” refers to pores having a diameter of from 2 to 50 nanometers. 
     Suitable microporous crystalline materials include silicates, aluminosilicates, titanosilicates, aluminophosphates, metallophosphates, silicoaluminophosphates or their mixtures. Such microporous crystalline materials include materials having the framework types MFI (e.g., ZSM-5 and silicalite), MEL (e.g., ZSM-11), MTW (e.g., ZSM-12), TON (e.g., ZSM-22), MTT (e.g., ZSM-23), FER (e.g., ZSM-35), MFS (e.g., ZSM-57), MWW (e.g., MCM-22, PSH-3, SSZ-25, ERB-1, ITQ-1, ITQ-2, MCM-36, MCM-49 and MCM-56), IWR (e.g., ITQ-24), KFI (e.g., ZK-5), BEA (e.g., zeolite beta), ITH (e.g., ITQ-13), MOR (e.g., mordenite), FAU (e.g., zeolites X, Y, ultrastabilized Y and dealuminized Y), LTL (e.g., zeolite L), IWW (e.g., ITQ-22), VFI (e.g., VPI-5), AEL (e.g., SAPO-11), AFI (e.g., ALPO-5) and AFO (SAPO-41), as well as materials such as MCM-68, EMM-1, EMM-2, ITQ-23, ITQ-24, ITQ-25, ITQ-26, ETS-2, ETS-10, SAPO-17, SAPO-34 and SAPO-35. Suitable mesoporous materials include MCM-41, MCM-48, MCM-50, FSM-16 and SBA-15. 
     Examples of preferred catalysts include molybdenum, tungsten, zinc, rhenium and compounds and combinations thereof on ZSM-5, silica or alumina. 
     The metal component can be dispersed on the inorganic support by any means well known in the art such as co-precipitation, incipient wetness, evaporation, impregnation, spray-drying, sol-gel, ion-exchange, chemical vapor deposition, diffusion and physical mixing. In addition, the inorganic support can be modified by known methods, such as, for example, steaming, acid washing, caustic washing and/or treatment with silicon-containing compounds, phosphorus-containing compounds, and/or elements or compounds of Groups 1, 2, 3 and 13 of the Periodic Table of Elements. Such modifications can be used to alter the surface activity of the support and hinder or enhance access to any internal pore structure of the support. 
     In some embodiments, a non-catalytic particulate material may be supplied to the dehydrocyclization reaction in addition to the catalytic particulate material. The non-catalytic particulate material may be used as a material to transport energy (heat) into the system and/or to fill space as required providing the required hydrodynamic environment. The non-catalytic particulate material may form particulates without a binder or may be bound with an inorganic binder such as clay, silica, alumina, zirconia, or other metal oxide used to help maintain the physical integrity of the particles. Preferably the particles are of a substantially spherical shape. Examples of suitable non-catalytic particulate material are low surface area silica, alumina, ceramics, and silicon carbide. 
     The dehydrocyclization step is conducted by contacting the methane-containing feedstock with the particulate dehydrocyclization catalyst in one or more fixed bed, moving bed or fluidized bed reaction zones. Generally, the feedstock is contacted in the or each reaction zone with a moving bed of dehydrocyclization catalyst, wherein the feedstock flows countercurrent to the direction of movement of the dehydrocyclization catalyst. In one embodiment, the or each reaction zone comprises a settling bed reactor, by which is meant a vertically disposed reactor in which particulate catalyst enters at or near the top of the reactor and flows under gravity to form a catalyst bed, while the feed enters the reactor at or near the base of the reactor and flows upwardly through the catalyst bed. 
     The movement of the dehydrocyclization catalyst in the reaction zone is substantially free of fluidization in the settling bed embodiment. The term “substantially free of fluidization” as used herein means that the average gas flowing velocity in the reactor is lower than the minimum fluidizing velocity. The term “substantially free of fluidization” as used herein also means that the average gas flowing velocity in the reactor is less than 99%, such as less than 95%, typically less than 90%, even less than 80% of the minimum fluidization velocity. Where the or each reaction zone is operated as a settling bed, the particulate catalytic material and/or any particulate non-catalytic material has an average particle size from about 0.1 mm to about 100 mm, such as from about 1 mm to about 5 mm, and for example from about 2 mm to about 4 mm. In some embodiments, at least 90 wt. % of the particulate catalytic material and/or at least 90 wt. % of the particulate non-catalytic material has an particle size from about 0.1 mm to about 100 mm, such as from about 1 mm to about 5 mm, for example from about 2 mm to about 4 mm. 
     In an alternative embodiment, the dehydrocyclization reaction is conducted in a plurality of series-connected fluidized bed reactors in which particulate catalyst is cascaded in one direction from one reactor to the next adjacent reactor in the series, while the feed is passed through and between the reactors in the opposite direction. Wherein each reaction zone is operated as a fluidizing bed, the catalytic particulate material and/or any non-catalytic particulate material has an average particle size from about 0.01 mm to about 10 mm, such as from about 0.05 mm to about 1 mm, and for example from about 0.1 mm to about 0.6 mm. In some embodiments, at least 90 wt. % of the catalytic particulate material and/or at least 90 wt. % of the non-catalytic particulate material have particle size from about 0.01 mm to about 10 mm, such as from about 0.05 to about 1 mm, and for example from about 0.1 to about 0.6 mm. 
     Typically, the mass ratio of the flowrate of the catalytic particulate material plus any non-catalytic particulate material over the flowrate of the hydrocarbon feedstock in the or each dehydrocyclization reaction zone is from about 1:1 to about 100:1, such as from about 1:1 to about 40:1, for example from about 5:1 to 20:1. 
     The dehydrocyclization reaction is endothermic and hence the temperature in each dehydrocyclization reaction zone will tend to decrease from a maximum temperature to a minimum temperature as the reaction proceeds. Suitable conditions for the dehydrocyclization step include a maximum temperature of about 700° C. to about 1200° C., such as about 800° C. to about 950° C. and a minimum temperature of about 400° C. to about 800° C., such as about 500° C. to about 700° C. However, as will be discussed below, heat is supplied to the dehydrocyclization reaction to reduce the temperature drop during the reaction and hence in some configurations it is possible to reduce the difference between the maximum and minimum temperatures to essentially zero. Alternatively, by supplying heated catalyst to the dehydrocyclization reaction, it is possible to produce an inverse temperature profile; that is with the process gas outlet reaction temperature being greater than the process gas inlet reaction temperature. 
     In one embodiment, the countercurrent flow of the feedstock and the particulate dehydrocyclization catalyst is arranged to produce an inverse temperature profile across dehydrocyclization reaction system, such that, despite the endothermic nature of the dehydrocyclization reaction, the difference between the reaction temperature of the gaseous effluent at the outlet from the dehydrocyclization reaction system and the reaction temperature of the methane-containing feed at the inlet to the dehydrocyclization reaction system is at least +10° C., such as at least +50° C., for example at least +100° C., and even at least +150° C. 
     In any event, since the dehydrocyclization reaction is endothermic, the catalytic particulate material enters the dehydrocyclization reaction system at a first, high temperature, typically about 800° C. to about 1200° C., such as about 900° C. to about 1100° C., and exits the reaction system at a second lower temperature, typically about 500° C. to about 800° C., such as about 600° C. to about 700° C. The total temperature difference of the catalytic particulate material across the reaction zones is at least 100° C. 
     Other conditions used in the dehydrocyclization reaction generally include a pressure of about 1 kPa to about 1000 kPa, such as about 10 to about 500 kPa, for example about 50 kPa to about 200 kPa and a weight hourly space velocity of about 0.01 to about 1000 hr −1 , such as about 0.1 to about 500 hr −1 , for example about 1 to about 20 hr −1 . Conveniently, the dehydrocyclization step is conducted in the absence of O 2 . 
     The major components of the effluent from the dehydrocyclization step are hydrogen, benzene, naphthalene, carbon monoxide, ethylene, and unreacted methane. Typically, the effluent contains at least 5 wt. %, such as at least 10 wt. %, for example at least 20 wt. %, conveniently at least 30 wt. %, more aromatic rings than the feed. 
     The benzene and naphthalene are separated from the dehydrocyclization effluent, for example, by solvent extraction followed by fractionation, and can be recovered as a product stream. However, as will be discussed below, at least part of these aromatic components can be submitted to an alkylation step, before or after product recovery, to produce higher value materials, such as xylenes. Moreover, as will be discussed below, the present process utilizes the hydrogen generated as a by-product of the dehydrocyclization reaction and in particular converts at least part of the hydrogen to higher value products. 
     Catalyst Regeneration 
     The dehydrocyclization reaction tends to deposit coke on the catalyst and hence, to maintain the activity of the dehydrocyclization catalyst, at least part of the catalyst must be continuously or intermittently regenerated. This is typically achieved by withdrawing a portion of the catalyst from the or each reaction zone, either on an intermittent, or a continuous basis, and is transferred to a separate regeneration zone. In the regeneration zone, the coked dehydrocyclization catalyst is contacted with a hydrogen-containing gas under conditions effective to convert at least a portion of the carbonaceous material thereon to methane. Generally, the hydrogen-containing gas does not contain significant quantities of methane or other hydrocarbons; typically with the hydrocarbon content being less than 20 mol %, less than 18 mol %, less than 15 mol %, less than 10 mol %, less than 8 mol %, less than 6 mol %, less than 4 mol %, or less than 2 mol %. In one embodiment, the hydrogen required for the regeneration is obtained at least in part from the hydrogen-containing effluent from the dehydrocyclization reaction. 
     Conveniently, the regeneration conditions comprise a temperature from about 700° C. to about 1200° C., such as from about 800° C. to about 1000° C., such as about 850° C. to about 950° C. and a pressure of at least 100 kPaa, such between about 150 kPaa and about 5000 kPaa. Generally, however, the coked dehydrocyclization catalyst removed from the or each reaction zone will be at a lower temperature than the optimum for regeneration and hence the removed catalyst is initially heated to a desired regeneration temperature by direct and/or indirect contact with combustion gases produced by combustion of a supplemental fuel. The heating is conducted in a heating zone which may be in the same vessel as the regeneration zone or which may be in a separate vessel from the regeneration zone. 
     By “supplemental source of fuel” is meant that the source fuel is physically separate from the catalyst and hence is not, for example, coke generated on the catalyst as a by-product of the dehydrocyclization reaction. Typically, the supplemental source of fuel comprises a hydrocarbon, such as methane, and in particular a suitable fuel source is the natural gas used as the feedstock to the process. Conveniently, an oxygen-lean atmosphere is maintained in the heating zone so that burning the hydrocarbon fuel to heat the first catalyst portion produces synthesis gas, which can then be used to generate additional hydrocarbon product and/or fuel. In addition, in the case of direct heat transfer to the dehydrocyclization catalyst, the use of an oxygen-lean atmosphere inhibits oxidation of metal carbides present in the catalyst and minimizes the average steam partial pressure thereby reducing catalyst hydrothermal aging. 
     Alternatively, a suitable supplemental fuel source is hydrogen and, in particular, part of the hydrogen generated as a by-product of the aromatization reaction. 
     Where the dehydrocyclization catalyst is heated directly, the coked catalyst withdrawn from the reaction zone is conveniently contacted directly with the burning source of fuel in the heating zone. Alternatively, the source of fuel is burned in a separate combustion zone and the combustion gases generated in the combustion zone are fed to the heating zone to heat the catalyst. Alternatively, the dehydrocyclization catalyst can be heated by indirect heat exchange such as, for example, by using the combustion gases to heat an inert medium (gas, liquid, or solid) or a heat transfer surface and then contacting the coked catalyst with the heated inert medium or heat transfer surface. 
     In one practical embodiment, the heating zone is elongated and the coked catalyst is passed through the heating zone from an inlet at or adjacent one end of the heating zone to an outlet at or adjacent the other end of the heating zone, with heat being applied to first catalyst portion at a plurality of locations spaced along the length of the heating zone. In this way, the heat input to the catalyst can be distributed along the length of the heating zone thereby minimizing catalyst surface temperatures and internal gradients. 
     Where the first catalyst portion is heated by direct contact with the burning source of fuel in the heating zone, gradual heating of the catalyst can be achieved by supplying substantially all of the supplemental fuel to the inlet end of the heating zone and then supplying the oxygen-containing gas incrementally to said heating zone at said plurality of spaced locations along the length of heating zone. Alternatively, substantially all of the oxygen-containing gas required to burn said supplemental fuel can be supplied to the inlet end of the heating zone and the supplemental fuel supplied incrementally to the heating zone at said plurality of spaced locations. 
     Where the first catalyst portion is heated by direct contact with hot combustion gases generated in a separate combustion zone, gradual heating of the catalyst can be achieved by supplying the hot combustion gases to said plurality of spaced locations along the length of heating zone. 
     In one embodiment, the heating zone is a riser and said first catalyst portion is passed upwardly through the riser during the reheating step. In practice, the heating zone may include a plurality of risers connected in parallel. Alternatively, said heating zone can include a moving bed of said catalyst. 
     In one embodiment, the coked dehydrocyclization catalyst removed from the reaction zone is divided into at least two portions, which are heated as described above and then fed to separate regeneration zones operated at different pressures. For example, one regeneration zone is operated at a pressure of at least 100 kPaa, such between about 150 kPaa and about 700 kPaa, as described above, whereas the other regeneration zone is operated at a pressure of at least 500 kPaa, such between about 1000 kPaa and about 5000 kPaa. Thus, it has been found, as shown in the Examples, that higher pressure regeneration provides faster removal of coke as well as removal of more refractory coke. However it has also been determined that it will require more expensive hardware to enable removal of coke at higher pressures. For this reason, there may be advantage in removing a portion of the coke at a lower hydrogen partial pressure in less expensive equipment and removing a further portion of the coke at higher hydrogen partial pressure in more expensive equipment. 
     The or each regeneration zone may be a reactor operated as a fluidized bed, an ebulating bed, a settling bed, a riser reactor or a combination thereof. In practice, each regeneration zone may include a plurality of reactors, such as a plurality of riser reactors connected in parallel or a plurality of reactors connected in series such as a riser reactor followed by a settling bed. After regeneration the catalyst is returned to reaction zone. 
     In an alternative embodiment, and particularly where the dehydrocyclization reaction is conducted in a fixed bed reactor, the regeneration can be conducted without removal of the catalyst from the reaction zone, by temporarily discontinuing the supply of methane-containing feedstock to the reaction zone, heating the reaction zone to a regeneration temperature of about 700° C. to about 1200° C. by direct and/or indirect contact with combustion gases produced by combustion of a supplemental fuel, regenerating the particulate catalytic material with a hydrogen-containing gas, and then re-establishing the supply of methane-containing feedstock to the reaction zone. It is to be appreciated that heating the reaction zone to the regeneration temperature can be affected before the supply of methane-containing feedstock is discontinued. 
     Catalyst Reheating 
     Since the dehydrocyclization reaction is endothermic, it is necessary to supply heat to the reaction. In the present process, this is conveniently achieved by withdrawing part of the catalyst from the reaction zone, either on an intermittent or a continuous basis, supplying heat to the catalyst and then returning the heated catalyst back to the reaction zone. Since the hydrogen regeneration step described above also involves heating the catalyst and then recycling the heated regenerated catalyst back to the reaction zone, one possible route for supplying heat to the dehydrocyclization reaction is by means of the regeneration process. 
     Alternatively, some or all of the heat required to maintain the dehydrocyclization reaction can be supplied by a separate catalyst reheating step. In this embodiment, part of the catalyst withdrawn for the reaction zone is transferred to a separate heating zone, where again the catalyst is heated by direct or indirect contact with hot combustion gases generated by burning a supplemental source of fuel. The heated catalyst is then returned to the reaction zone with or without undergoing hydrogen regeneration. 
     Catalyst Recarburizing 
     It will be appreciated that heating the dehydrocyclization catalyst for the purposes of regeneration and/or for heat transfer back the dehydrocyclization reaction may subject the catalyst to high temperature oxidizing conditions, especially where catalyst heating involves direct contact with hot combustion gases. As a result, metals, such as rhenium, tungsten or molybdenum, present in the dehydrocyclization catalyst may be converted during the heating step from their catalytically active elemental or carbide form to an oxide species. Thus, before being returned to the reaction zone, the regenerated and/or reheated catalyst may be transferred to a catalyst treatment zone separate from the regeneration zone, the heating zone and the reaction zone, where the catalyst is contacted with a carburizing gas containing at least one hydrocarbon selected from methane, ethane, propane, butane, isobutene, hexane, benzene and naphthalene. In some cases, the carburizing gas may also contain at least one of CO 2 , CO, H 2 , H 2 O and inert diluents. Alternatively, the carburizing gas may be a mixture of hydrogen and at least one of CO and CO 2 . Moreover, it may be desirable to contact the catalyst sequentially with a plurality of different carburizing gases, each comprising a hydrocarbon selected from methane, ethane, propane, butane, isobutene, hexane, benzene and naphthalene or a mixture of hydrogen and at least one of CO and CO 2 . 
     Generally the maximum temperature in the catalyst treatment zone is from about 400° C. to about 1100° C., such as from about 500° C. to about 900° C., with the minimum temperature being between 300° C. and 500° C. Typically, the catalyst treatment zone is operated at pressures between 10 and 100 psia (69 and 690 kPa), such as between 15 and 60 psia (103 and 414 kPa). Generally, the average residence time of catalyst particles in the catalyst treatment zone will be between 0.1 and 100 minutes, for example between 1 and 20 minutes. Under these conditions, the carburizing gas reacts with metal oxide species on the catalyst to return the metal to its catalytically active elemental or carbidic form. In addition, the carburizing gas can react with active surface sites on the catalyst support to decrease their tendency to generate coke in the dehydroaromatization reaction zone. 
     To maintain the temperature required for carburization of the regenerated catalyst, heat can supplied to the catalyst and/or the carburizing gas prior to or during the carburization step. For example heat can be supplied to the catalyst by indirect heating, by contacting with hot flue gas from the reaction zone or the heating zone, by contacting with the hot gaseous effluent from the carburization process, or by mixing with heated catalyst from the heating zone. Heat is conveniently supplied to the carburization gas by means of an external furnace or heat exchanger or by with heated catalyst from the heating zone. 
     The catalyst treatment zone may be operated as a fluidized bed reactor, ebulating bed reactor, settling bed reactor, riser reactor or circulating riser reactor. In one embodiment, the catalyst treatment zone comprises a settling bed reactor. Alternatively, the catalyst treatment zone comprises a single fluidized bed reactor with internal baffles to prevent back-mixing or a plurality of fluidized bed reactors in series with the regenerated catalyst being cascaded between adjacent reactors. In any event, contact in the catalyst treatment zone is facilitated by arranging that the regenerated catalyst and the carburizing gas flow in opposite directions in said catalyst treatment zone. Employing such a countercurrent flow, a temperature profile may be developed in the catalyst treatment zone such that carburization of the regenerated catalyst initially occurs at a low temperature but the carburization temperature increases as the catalyst flows through the bed. 
     In some cases, it may be desirable that the heated unregenerated catalyst is initially contacted with a H 2 -rich stream to partially or fully reduce the metal component of the catalyst prior to the carburization step. It may also be desirable to subject the carburized catalyst to post treatment with H 2  and/or CO 2  to strip off any excess carbon that may have been deposited on the catalyst by the carburization step. 
     In practice, as the dehydrocyclization reaction proceeds, fresh dehydrocyclization catalyst will be added to the process either to make up for catalyst lost by mechanical attrition or deactivation and, although there are multiple means of addition of fresh catalyst, to avoid damage to the catalyst, it is generally desirable to add fresh catalyst to a region of the process that is operating at a temperature below the maximum temperature in each dehydrocyclization reaction zone. In one embodiment, fresh dehydrocyclization catalyst is added to the process by introduction into the catalyst treatment zone, whereby the fresh catalyst is contacted with the carburizing gas prior to transfer to the reaction zone for contact with the methane-containing feed. In another, embodiment the catalyst may be added to the lower temperature regions of a reactor system with an inverse temperature profile. 
     Hydrogen Management 
     Since hydrogen is a major component of the dehydrocyclization effluent, after recovery of the aromatic products, the effluent is subjected to a hydrogen rejection step to reduce the hydrogen content of the effluent before the unreacted methane is recycled to the dehydrocyclization step and to maximize feed utilization. Typically the hydrogen rejection step comprises reacting at least part of the hydrogen in the dehydrocyclization effluent with an oxygen-containing species, such as CO and/or CO 2 , to produce water and a second effluent stream having a reduced hydrogen content compared with the first (dehydrocyclization) effluent stream. Suitable hydrogen rejection processes are described below and in our copending PCT Application Serial No. PCT/US2005/044042, filed on Dec. 2, 2005. 
     Conveniently, the hydrogen rejection step includes (i) methanation and/or ethanation, (ii) a Fischer-Tropsch process, (iii) synthesis of C 1  to C 3  alcohols, particularly methanol, and other oxygenates, (iv) synthesis of light olefins, paraffins and/or aromatics by way of a methanol or dimethyl ether intermediate and/or (v) selective hydrogen combustion. These steps may be employed sequentially to gain the greatest benefit; for example Fischer-Tropsch may first be employed to yield a C 2 +enriched stream followed by methanation to achieve high conversion of the H 2 . 
     Typically, as described below, the hydrogen rejection step will generate hydrocarbons, in which case, after separation of the co-produced water, at least portion of the hydrocarbons are conveniently recycled to the dehydrocyclization step. For example, where the hydrocarbons produced in the hydrogen rejection step comprise paraffins and olefins, the portion recycled to the dehydrocyclization step conveniently comprises, paraffins or olefins with 6 or less carbon atoms, such as 5 or less carbon atoms, for example 4 or less carbon atoms or 3 or less carbon atoms. Where, the hydrocarbons produced in the hydrogen rejection step comprise aromatics, the portion recycled to the dehydrocyclization step conveniently comprises single ring aromatic species. 
     Methanation/Ethanation 
     In one embodiment the hydrogen rejection step comprises reaction of at least part of the hydrogen in the dehydrocyclization effluent with carbon dioxide to produce methane and/or ethane according to the following net reactions:
 
CO 2 +4H 2     CH 4 +2H 2 O   (Reaction 6)
 
2CO 2 +7H 2     C 2 H 6 +4H 2 O   (Reaction 7)
 
     The carbon dioxide employed is conveniently part of a natural gas stream and typically the same natural gas stream used as the feed to the dehydrocyclization step. Where the carbon dioxide is part of a methane-containing stream, the CO 2 :CH 4  of the stream is conveniently maintained between about 1:1 and about 0.1:1. Mixing of the carbon dioxide-containing stream and the dehydrocyclization effluent is conveniently achieved by supplying the gaseous feeds to the inlet of a jet ejector. 
     The hydrogen rejection step to produce methane or ethane normally employs a H 2 :CO 2  molar ratio close to the stoichiometric proportions required for the desired Reaction 6 or Reaction 7, although small variations can be made in the stoichiometric ratio if it is desired to produce a CO 2 -containing or H 2 -containing second effluent stream. The hydrogen rejection step to produce methane or ethane is conveniently effected in the presence of a bifunctional catalyst comprising a metal component, particularly a transition metal or compound thereof, on an inorganic support. Suitable metal components comprise copper, iron, vanadium, chromium, zinc, gallium, nickel, cobalt, molybdenum, ruthenium, rhodium, palladium, silver, rhenium, tungsten, iridium, platinum, gold, gallium and combinations and compounds thereof. The inorganic support may be an amorphous material, such as silica, alumina or silica-alumina, or like those listed for the dehydroaromatization catalyst. In addition, the inorganic support may be a crystalline material, such as a microporous or mesoporous crystalline material. Suitable porous crystalline materials include the aluminosilicates, aluminophosphates and silicoaluminophosphates listed above for the dehydrocyclization catalyst. 
     The hydrogen rejection step to produce methane and/or ethane can be conducted over a wide range of conditions including a temperature of about 100° C. to about 900° C., such as about 150° C. to about 500° C., for example about 200° C. to about 400° C., a pressure of about 200 kPa to about 20,000 kPa, such as about 500 to about 5000 kPa and a weight hourly space velocity of about 0.1 to about 10,000 hr −1 , such as about 1 to about 1,000 hr −1 . CO 2  conversion levels are typically between 20 and 100% and conveniently greater than 90%, such as greater than 99%. This exothermic reaction may be carried out in multiple catalyst beds with heat removal between beds. In addition, the lead bed(s) may be operated at higher temperatures to maximize kinetic rates and the tail beds(s) may be operated at lower temperatures to maximize thermodynamic conversion. 
     The main products of the reaction are water and, depending on the H 2 :CO 2  molar ratio, methane, ethane and higher alkanes, together with some unsaturated C 2  and higher hydrocarbons. In addition, some partial hydrogenation of the carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide is preferred. After removal of the water, the methane, carbon monoxide, any unreacted carbon dioxide and higher hydrocarbons can be fed directly to the dehydrocyclization step to generate additional aromatic products. 
     Fischer-Tropsch Process 
     In another embodiment the hydrogen rejection step comprises reaction of at least part of the hydrogen in the dehydrocyclization effluent with carbon monoxide according to the Fischer-Tropsch process to produce C 2  to C 5  paraffins and olefins. 
     The Fischer-Tropsch process is well known in the art, see for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,348,982 and 5,545,674 incorporated herein by reference. The process typically involves the reaction of hydrogen and carbon monoxide in a molar ratio of about 0.5:1 to about 4:1, such as about 1.5:1 to about 2.5:1, at a temperature of about 175° C. to about 400° C., such as about 180° C. to about 240° C. and a pressure of about 1 to about 100 bar (100 to 10,000 kPa), such as about 10 to about 40 bar (1,000 to 4,000 kPa), in the presence of a Fischer-Tropsch catalyst, generally a supported or unsupported Group VIII, non-noble metal, e.g., Fe, Ni, Ru, Co, with or without a promoter, e.g. ruthenium, rhenium, hafnium, zirconium, titanium. Supports, when used, can be refractory metal oxides such as Group IVB, i.e., titania, zirconia, or silica, alumina, or silica-alumina. In one embodiment, the catalyst comprises a non-shifting catalyst, e.g., cobalt or ruthenium, especially cobalt, with rhenium or zirconium as a promoter, especially cobalt and rhenium supported on silica or titania, generally titania. 
     In another embodiment, the hydrocarbon synthesis catalyst comprises a metal, such as Cu, Cu/Zn or Cr/Zn, on the ZSM-5 and the process is operated to generate significant quantities of single-ring aromatic hydrocarbons. An example of such a process is described in  Study of Physical Mixtures of Cr   2 O 3   —ZnO and ZSM -5  Catalysts for the Transformation of Syngas into Liquid Hydrocarbons  by Jose Erena; Ind. Eng. Chem Res. 1998, 37, 1211-1219, incorporated herein by reference. 
     The Fischer-Tropsch liquids, i.e., C 5 +, are recovered and light gases, e.g., unreacted hydrogen and CO, C 1  to C 3  or C 4  and water are separated from the heavier hydrocarbons. The heavier hydrocarbons can then be recovered as products or fed to the dehydrocyclization step to generate additional aromatic products. 
     The carbon monoxide required for the Fischer-Tropsch reaction can be provided wholly or partly by the carbon monoxide present in or cofed with the methane-containing feed and generated as a by-product in the dehydrocyclization step. If required, additional carbon monoxide can be generated by feeding carbon dioxide contained, for example, in natural gas, to a shift catalyst whereby carbon monoxide is produced by the reverse water gas shift reaction:
 
CO 2 +H 2     CO+H 2 O   (Reaction 8)
 
and by the following reaction:
 
CH 4 +H 2 O   CO+3H 2  
 
Alcohol Synthesis
 
     In a further embodiment the hydrogen rejection step comprises reaction of at least part of the hydrogen in the dehydrocyclization effluent with carbon monoxide to produce C 1  to C 3  alcohols, and particularly methanol. The production of methanol and other oxygenates from synthesis gas is also well-known and is described in, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,114,279; 6,054,497; 5,767,039; 5,045,520; 5,254,520; 5,610,202; 4,666,945; 4,455,394; 4,565,803; 5,385,949, the descriptions of which are incorporated herein by reference. Typically, the synthesis gas employed has a molar ratio of hydrogen (H 2 ) to carbon oxides (CO+CO 2 ) in the range of from about 0.5:1 to about 20:1, such as in the range of from about 2:1 to about 10:1, with carbon dioxide optionally being present in an amount of not greater than 50% by weight, based on total weight of the syngas. 
     The catalyst used in the methanol synthesis process generally includes an oxide of at least one element selected from the group consisting of copper, silver, zinc, boron, magnesium, aluminum, vanadium, chromium, manganese, gallium, palladium, osmium and zirconium. Conveniently, the catalyst is a copper based catalyst, such as in the form of copper oxide, optionally in the presence of an oxide of at least one element selected from silver, zinc, boron, magnesium, aluminum, vanadium, chromium, manganese, gallium, palladium, osmium and zirconium. Conveniently, the catalyst contains copper oxide and an oxide of at least one element selected from zinc, magnesium, aluminum, chromium, and zirconium. In one embodiment, the methanol synthesis catalyst is selected from the group consisting of: copper oxides, zinc oxides and aluminum oxides. More preferably, the catalyst contains oxides of copper and zinc. 
     The methanol synthesis process can be conducted over a wide range of temperatures and pressures. Suitable temperatures are in the range of from about 150° C. to about 450° C., such as from about 175° C. to about 350° C., for example from about 200° C. to about 300° C. Suitable pressures are in the range of from about 1,500 kPa to about 12,500 kPa, such as from about 2,000 kPa to about 10,000 kPa, for example 2,500 kPa to about 7,500 kPa. Gas hourly space velocities vary depending upon the type of process that is used, but generally the gas hourly space velocity of flow of gas through the catalyst bed is in the range of from about 50 hr −1  to about 50,000 hr −1 , such as from about 250 hr −1  to about 25,000 hr −1 , for example from about 500 hr −1  to about 10,000 hr −1 . This exothermic reaction may be carried out in either fixed or fluidized beds, including multiple catalyst beds with heat removal between beds. In addition, the lead bed(s) may be operated at higher temperatures to maximize kinetic rates and the tail beds(s) may be operated at lower temperatures to maximize thermodynamic conversion. 
     The resultant methanol and/or other oxygenates can be sold as a separate product, can be used to alkylate the aromatics generated in the dehydrocyclization step to higher value products, such as xylenes, or can be used as a feedstock for the production of lower olefins, particularly ethylene and propylene. The conversion of methanol to olefins is a well-known process and is, for example, described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,499,327, incorporated herein by reference. 
     Selective Hydrogen Combustion 
     In yet another embodiment, the hydrogen rejection step comprises selective hydrogen combustion, which is a process in which hydrogen in a mixed stream is reacted with oxygen to form water or steam without substantially reacting hydrocarbons in the stream with oxygen to form carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, and/or oxygenated hydrocarbons. Generally, selective hydrogen combustion is carried out in the presence of an oxygen-containing solid material, such as a mixed metal oxide, that will release a portion of the bound oxygen to the hydrogen. 
     One suitable selective hydrogen combustion process is described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,430,210, incorporated herein by reference, and comprises contacting at reactive conditions a first stream comprising hydrocarbon and hydrogen and a second stream comprising oxygen with separate surfaces of a membrane impervious to non-oxygen containing gases, wherein said membrane comprises a metal oxide selective for hydrogen combustion, and recovering selective hydrogen combustion product. The metal oxide is typically a mixed metal oxide of bismuth, indium, antimony, thallium and/or zinc. 
     U.S. Pat. No. 5,527,979, incorporated herein by reference, describes a process for the net catalytic oxidative dehydrogenation of alkanes to produce alkenes. The process involves simultaneous equilibrium dehydrogenation of alkanes to alkenes and the selective combustion of the hydrogen formed to drive the equilibrium dehydrogenation reaction further to the product alkenes. In particular, the alkane feed is dehydrogenated over an equilibrium dehydrogenation catalyst in a first reactor, and the effluent from the first reactor, along with oxygen, is then passed into a second reactor containing a metal oxide catalyst which serves to selectively catalyze the combustion of hydrogen. The equilibrium dehydrogenation catalyst may comprise platinum and the selective metal oxide combustion catalyst may contain bismuth, antimony, indium, zinc, thallium, lead and tellurium or a mixture thereof. 
     U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2004/0152586, published Aug. 5, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference, describes a process for reducing the hydrogen content of the effluent from a cracking reactor. The process employs a catalyst system comprising (1) at least one solid acid cracking component and (2) at least one metal-based selective hydrogen combustion component consisting essentially of (a) a metal combination selected from the group consisting of: i) at least one metal from Group 3 and at least one metal from Groups 4-15 of the Periodic Table of the Elements; ii) at least one metal from Groups 5-15 of the Periodic Table of the Elements, and at least one metal from at least one of Groups 1, 2, and 4 of the Periodic Table of the Elements; iii) at least one metal from Groups 1-2, at least one metal from Group 3, and at least one metal from Groups 4-15 of the Periodic Table of the Elements; and iv) two or more metals from Groups 4-15 of the Periodic Table of the Elements; and (b) at least one of oxygen and sulfur, wherein the at least one of oxygen and sulfur is chemically bound both within and between the metals. 
     The selective hydrogen combustion reaction of the present invention is generally conducted at a temperature in the range of from about 300° C. to about 850° C. and a pressure in the range of from about 1 atm to about 20 atm (100 to 2000 kPa). 
     Aromatic Product Recovery/Treatment 
     In addition to hydrogen, the other major products of the dehydrocyclization step are benzene and naphthalene. These products can be separated from the dehydrocyclization effluent, typically by solvent extraction followed by fractionation, and then sold directly as commodity chemicals. Alternatively, some or all of the benzene and/or naphthalene can be alkylated to produce, for example, toluene, xylenes and alkyl naphthalenes and/or can be subjected to hydrogenation to produce, for example, cyclohexane, cyclohexene, dihydronaphthalene (benzylcyclohexene), tetrahydronaphthalene (tetralin), hexahydronaphthalene (dicyclohexene), octahydronaphthalene and/or decahydronaphthalene (decalin). Suitable alkylation and hydrogenation processes are described below and in more detail in our copending PCT Application Serial Nos. PCT/US2005/043523, filed on Dec. 2, 2005 and PCT/US2005/044038, filed on Dec. 2, 2005. 
     Aromatics Alkylation 
     Alkylation of aromatic compounds such as benzene and naphthalene is well known in the art and typically involves reaction of an olefin, alcohol or alkyl halide with the aromatic species in the gas or liquid phase in the presence of an acid catalyst. Suitable acid catalysts include medium pore zeolites (i.e., those having a Constraint Index of 2-12 as defined in U.S. Pat. No. 4,016,218), including materials having the framework types MFI (e.g., ZSM-5 and silicalite), MEL (e.g., ZSM-11), MTW (e.g., ZSM-12), TON (e.g., ZSM-22), MTT (e.g., ZSM-23), MFS (e.g., ZSM-57) and FER (e.g., ZSM-35) and ZSM-48, as well as large pore zeolites (i.e., those having a Constraint Index of less than 2) such as materials having the framework types BEA (e.g., zeolite beta), FAU (e.g., ZSM-3, ZSM-20, zeolites X, Y, ultrastabilized Y and dealuminized Y), MOR (e.g., mordenite), MAZ (e.g., ZSM-4), MEI (e.g., ZSM-18) and MWW (e.g., MCM-22, PSH-3, SSZ-25, ERB-1, ITQ-1, ITQ-2, MCM-36, MCM-49 and MCM-56). 
     In one embodiment of the present process, benzene is recovered from the dehydrocyclization effluent and then alkylated with an olefin, such as ethylene produced as a by-product of a hydrogen rejection step employing ethanation/methanation. Typical conditions for carrying out the vapor phase alkylation of benzene with ethylene include a temperature of from about 650 to 900° F. (343 to 482° C.), a pressure of about atmospheric to about 3000 psig (100 to 20,800 kPa), a WHSV based on ethylene of from about 0.5 to about 2.0 hr −1  and a mole ratio of benzene to ethylene of from 1:1 to 30:1. Liquid phase alkylation of benzene with ethylene may be carried out at a temperature between 300 and 650° F. (150 to 340° C.), a pressure up to about 3000 psig (20,800 kPa), a WHSV based on ethylene of from about 0.1 to about 20 hr −1  and a mole ratio of benzene to ethylene of from 1:1 to 30:1. 
     Conveniently, the benzene ethylation is conducted under at least partial liquid phase conditions using a catalyst comprising at least one of zeolite beta, zeolite Y, MCM-22, PSH-3, SSZ-25, ERB-1, ITQ-1, ITQ-2, ITQ-13, ZSM-5 MCM-36, MCM-49 and MCM-56. 
     The benzene ethylation can be conducted at the site of the dehydrocyclization/hydrogen rejection process or the benzene can be shipped to another location for conversion to ethylbenzene. The resultant ethylbenzene can then be sold, used as a precursor in, for example, the production of styrene or isomerized by methods well known in the art to mixed xylenes. 
     In another embodiment of the present process, the alkylating agent is methanol or dimethylether (DME) and is used to alkylate benzene and/or naphthalene recovered from the dehydrocyclization effluent to produce toluene, xylenes, methylnaphthalenes and/or dimethylnaphthalenes. Where the methanol or DME is used to alkylate benzene, this is conveniently effected in presence of catalyst comprising a zeolite, such as ZSM-5, zeolite beta, ITQ-13, MCM-22, MCM-49, ZSM-11, ZSM-12, ZSM-22, ZSM-23, ZSM-35, and ZSM-48, which has been modified by steaming so as to have a Diffusion Parameter for 2,2 dimethylbutane of about 0.1-15 sec −1  when measured at a temperature of 120° C. and a 2,2 dimethylbutane pressure of 60 torr (8 kPa). Such a process is selective to the production of para-xylene and is described in, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,504,272, incorporated herein by reference. Where the methanol is used to alkylate naphthalene, this is conveniently effected in the presence of a catalyst comprising ZSM-5, MCM-22, PSH-3, SSZ-25, ERB-1, ITQ-1, ITQ-2, ITQ-13, MCM-36, MCM-49 or MCM-56. Such a process can be used to selectively produce 2,6-dimethylnaphthalene and is described in, for example, U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,795,847 and 5,001,295, incorporated herein by reference. 
     Where methanol or DME is used as an alkylating agent in the process of the invention, it can be provided as a separate feed to the process or can at least partly be generated in situ by adding a carbon dioxide-containing feed gas, such as a natural gas stream, to part or all of the effluent from the dehydrocyclization step. In particular, the dehydrocyclization effluent, prior to any separation of the aromatic components, can be fed to a reverse shift reactor and reacted with the carbon dioxide-containing feed under conditions to increase the carbon monoxide content of the effluent by reactions, such as Reactions 5 and 8 above. 
     In addition, methane and CO 2  and/or steam may be fed to a reverse shift reactor to generate syngas which can then be mixed with a portion of the dehydrocyclization effluent to adjust the H 2 /CO/CO 2  ratios as required for the alkylation step. 
     Typically, the reverse shift reactor contains a catalyst comprising a transition metal on a support, such as Fe, Ni, Cr, Zn on alumina, silica or titania, and is operated under conditions including a temperature of about 500° C. to about 1200° C., such as about 600° C. to about 1000° C., for example about 700° C. to about 950° C. and a pressure of about 1 kPa to about 10,000 kPa, such as about 2,000 kPa to about 10,000 kPa, for example about 3000 kPa to about 5,000 kPa. Gas hourly space velocities may vary depending upon the type of process used, but generally the gas hourly space velocity of flow of gas through the catalyst bed is in the range of about 50 hr −1  to about 50,000 hr −1 , such as about 250 hr −1  to about 25,000 hr −1 , more for example about 500 hr −1  to about 10,000 hr −1 . 
     The effluent from the reverse shift reactor can then be fed to an alkylation reactor operating under conditions to cause reactions such as the following to occur:
 
CO+2H 2     CH 3 OH   (Reaction 9)
 
CH 3 OH+C 6 H 6 →toluene+H 2 O   (Reaction 10)
 
2CH 3 OH+C 6 H 6 →xylenes+2H 2 O   (Reaction 11)
 
     Suitable conditions for such an alkylation reactor would include a temperature of about 100 to about 700° C., a pressure of about 1 to about 300 atmospheres (100 to 30,000 kPa), and a WHSV for the aromatic hydrocarbon of about 0.01 to about 100 hr −1 . A suitable catalyst would comprise a molecular sieve having a constraint index of 1 to 12, such as ZSM-5, typically together with one or metals or metal oxides, such as copper, chromium and/or zinc oxide. 
     Conveniently, where the alkylation catalyst includes a molecular sieve, the latter is modified to change its diffusion characteristics such that the predominant xylene isomer produced by Reaction 11 is paraxylene. Suitable means of diffusion modification include steaming and ex-situ or in-situ deposition of silicon compounds, coke, metal oxides, such as MgO, and/or P on the surface or in the pore mouths of the molecular sieve. Also preferred is that an active metal be incorporated into the molecular sieve so as to saturate more highly reactive species, such as olefins, which may be generated as by-products and which could otherwise cause catalyst deactivation. 
     The effluent from the alkylation reactor could then be fed to a separation section in which the aromatic products would initially be separated from the hydrogen and other low molecular weight materials, conveniently by solvent extraction. The aromatics products could then be fractionated into a benzene fraction, a toluene fraction, a C 8  fraction and a heavy fraction containing naphthalene and alkylated naphthalenes. The C 8  aromatic fraction could then be fed to a crystallization or sorption process to separate the valuable p-xylene component and the remaining mixed xylenes either sold as product or fed to an isomerization loop to generate more p-xylene. The toluene fraction could either be removed as saleable product, recycled to the alkylation reactor or fed to a toluene disproportionation unit, such as a selective toluene disproportionation unit for the preparation of additional p-xylene. 
     Aromatics Hydrogenation 
     In addition to or instead of the alkylation step, at least part of the aromatic components in the dehydrocyclization effluent can be hydrogenated to generate useful products such as cyclohexane, cyclohexene, dihydronaphthalene (benzylcyclohexene), tetrahydronaphthalene (tetralin), hexahydronaphthalene (dicyclohexene), octahydronaphthalene and/or decahydronaphthalene (decalin). These products can be employed as fuels and chemical intermediates and, in the case of tetralin and decalin, can be used as the solvent for extracting the aromatic components from the dehydrocyclization effluent. 
     The hydrogenation is conveniently, but not necessarily, conducted after separation of the aromatic components from the dehydrocyclization effluent and conveniently employs part of the hydrogen generated by the dehydrocyclization reaction. Suitable aromatic hydrogenation processes are well known in the art and typically employ a catalyst comprising Ni, Pd, Pt, Ni/Mo or sulfided Ni/Mo supported on alumina or silica support. Suitable operating conditions for the hydrogenation process include a temperature of about 300 to about 1,000° F. (150 to 540° C.), such as about 500 to about 700° F. (260 to 370° C.), a pressure of about 50 to about 2,000 psig (445 to 13890 kPa), such as about 100 to about 500 psig (790 to 3550 kPa) and a WHSV of about 0.5 to about 50 hr −1 , such as about 2 to about 10 hr −1 . 
     Partial hydrogenation to leave one or more olefinic carbon-carbon bonds in the product may also be desirable so as to produce materials suitable for polymerization or other downstream chemical conversion. Suitable partial hydrogenation processes are well known in the art and typically employ a catalyst comprising noble metals with ruthenium being preferred supported on metallic oxides, such as La 2 O 3 —ZnO. Homogeneous noble metal catalyst systems can also be used. Examples of partial hydrogenation processes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,678,861; 4,734,536; 5,457,251; 5,656,761; 5,969,202; and 5,973,218, the entire contents of which are incorporated herein by reference. 
     An alternative hydrogenation process involves low pressure hydrocracking of the naphthalene component to produce alkylbenzenes over a catalyst such as sulfided Ni/W or sulfided Ni supported on an amorphous aluminosilicate or a zeolite, such as zeolite X, zeolite Y or zeolite beta. Suitable operating conditions for low pressure hydrocracking include a temperature of about 300 to about 1,000° F. (150 to 540° C.), such as about 500 to about 700° F. (260 to 370° C.), a pressure of about 50 to about 2,000 psig (445 to 13890 kPa), such as about 100 to about 500 psig (790 to 3550 kPa) and a WHSV of about 0.5 to about 50 hr −1 , such as about 2 to about 10 hr −1 . 
     The invention will now be more particularly described with reference to the accompanying drawings and the following non-limiting Examples. 
     Referring to  FIG. 1 , the drawing illustrates a simplified design of a dehydrocyclization reactor, with a catalyst reheater and a single catalyst regenerator, for converting methane to aromatics according to a first embodiment of the invention. In this embodiment, the dehydrocyclization reactor includes a vertically disposed settling bed reactor  11 , into which heated and regenerated particulate catalyst flows through an inlet  12  located adjacent the top of the reactor  11  and from which cooled, coked catalyst flows by way of an outlet  13  located adjacent the base of the reactor  11 . Methane feed  15  is introduced into the reactor  11  adjacent the base thereof. Typically, the heated catalyst enters the reactor  11  at a temperature of about 850° C. and the cooled, coked catalyst leaves the reactor at a temperature of about 650° C. 
     The cooled, coked catalyst flows under gravity from the outlet  13  to the base of a riser reheater  16 , where the catalyst is entrained in a mixture of air and methane fuel passed into the riser through a manifold  17 . The catalyst is transported up the riser reheater  16  by the air/methane mixture and is heated during its passage through the riser reheater  16  by combustion of the methane. The mixture entering the riser  16  reheater through the manifold  17  contains all the fuel required to heat the catalyst to the required reaction temperature, but is deficient in oxygen. Additional air is therefore introduced into the riser reheater  16  through a plurality of inlets  18  spaced along the length of the riser (for simplicity only one inlet  18  is indicated in  FIG. 1  but in reality the number may be far greater), whereby heating of the catalyst occurs gradually as the catalyst flows up through the riser reheater  16 . Typically, on reaching the top of the riser reheater  16 , the catalyst temperature is again at about 850° C. 
     On exiting the top of the riser reheater  16 , the heated catalyst passes into a separator  19  where the solid particulate catalyst is separated from the combustion gases and is directed into a hopper  20  and then into the upper end of a vertically disposed catalyst standpipe  21 . The combustion gases are vented from the separator through an outlet  22  and are then fed to cyclones (not shown) for removal of catalyst fines before being subjected to heat recovery. Using air as the combustion medium in the reheater  16 , the exiting combustion gases typically comprise 40-70 wt % N 2 , &lt;1 wt % O 2 , 1-30 wt % H 2 , 2-20 wt % CO, 1-20 wt % CO 2 , and 5-25 wt % H 2 O. 
     The rate of catalyst flow through the system and the internal diameter of the standpipe  21  are such that the heated catalyst builds up in the standpipe  21  to form a densely packed bed which flows under gravity through the standpipe  21  and into a regenerator  23  connected to the lower end of the standpipe  21 . Depending on the height of the standpipe  21  the pressure in the regenerator can be maintained at the required value for effective hydrogen regeneration of the catalyst. For example, to achieve a regenerator pressure of about 700 to 1000 kPaa using a Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst circulating such that the pressure in the separator  19  is about 140 kPaa, it has been calculated that the standpipe should have a height of between about 100 and 300 feet (30 to 91 m). 
     The catalyst from the standpipe  21  enters the regenerator  23  through an inlet  24  located adjacent the top of the regenerator  23  and flows down through the regenerator  23  countercurrent to a stream of hydrogen  25  which is injected into the regenerator  23  adjacent the base thereof. The regenerated catalyst exits the regenerator  23  though an outlet  26  also located adjacent the base of the regenerator  23  and then flows through a further riser  28  into a disengaging vessel  31  before reentering the reactor  11  through inlet  12 . The further riser  28  and disengaging vessel  31  serve to separate hydrogen entrained in the catalyst and, if necessary, methane can be injected into the base of the riser  28  to assist in the flow of the catalyst through the riser  28 . 
       FIG. 2  illustrates a process for converting methane to aromatics according to a second embodiment of the invention, in which a dehydrocyclization reactor is provided with a catalyst reheater and first and second catalyst regenerators connected in series and operating at different pressures. In this embodiment, the dehydrocyclization reactor again includes a vertically disposed settling bed reactor  111 , into which heated and regenerated particulate catalyst flows through inlets  112 ,  113  located adjacent the top of the reactor  111  and from which cooled, coked catalyst flows by way of an outlet  114  located adjacent the base of the reactor  111 . Methane feed  115  is introduced into the reactor  111  adjacent the base thereof. Typically, the heated catalyst enters the reactor  111  at a temperature of about 850° C. and the cooled, coked catalyst leaves the reactor at a temperature of about 650° C. 
     The cooled, coked catalyst flows under gravity from the outlet  113  to the base of a riser reheater  116 , where the catalyst is entrained in a mixture of air and methane fuel passed into the riser through a manifold  117 . The catalyst is transported up the riser reheater  116  by the air/methane mixture and is heated during its passage through the riser reheater  116  by combustion of the methane. The mixture entering the riser  116  reheater through the manifold  117  contains all the fuel required to heat the catalyst to the required reaction temperature, but is deficient in oxygen. Additional air is therefore introduced into the riser reheater  116  through a plurality of inlets  118  spaced along the length of the riser (for simplicity only one inlet  118  is indicated in  FIG. 2  but in reality the number may be far greater), whereby heating of the catalyst occurs gradually as the catalyst flows up through the riser reheater  116 . Typically, on reaching the top of the riser reheater  16 , the catalyst temperature is again at about 850° C. 
     On exiting the top of the riser reheater  116 , the heated catalyst passes into a cyclone separator  119  where the solid particulate catalyst is separated from the combustion gases and then fed into the top of a first, relatively low pressure regenerator  121 . The first regenerator  121  is located vertically above a second, relatively high pressure regenerator  122  and is connected to the second regenerator  122  by means of a vertically disposed catalyst standpipe  123 . A hydrogen stream  125  is injected into the first regenerator  121  adjacent the base thereof and flows upwardly through the first regenerator  121 . The height of the standpipe  123  determines the pressure difference between the first and second regenerators  121 ,  122 . 
     A hydrogen stream  124  is injected into the second regenerator  122  adjacent the base thereof and flows upwardly through the second regenerator  122 , the catalyst standpipe  123 , and the first regenerator  121  countercurrent to the catalyst flowing under gravity from the first regenerator  121  to the second regenerator  122 . The hydrogen regenerates the coked catalyst as it flows through the regenerators and part of the regenerated catalyst is returned to reactor  111  from the first regenerator  121  through inlet  112  and the remainder of the regenerated catalyst is returned to reactor  111  from the second regenerator  122  through inlet  113 . 
     The invention will now be more particularly described with reference to the following non-limiting Examples. 
     EXAMPLE 1 
     Example 1 demonstrates the use of co-feeds (such as H 2 , CO 2  and H 2 O) in order to achieve reduced coking rate of Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst during dehydrocyclization of methane to form primarily benzene. Example 2 will demonstrate that by reducing the amount of coke that is deposited on the catalyst during the on-oil period, it is possible to maintain high performance after multiple on-oil and regeneration cycles and that the lower single-cycle coking rate translates to a lower net coke deposition rate over multiple cycles. 
     Mo/ZSM-5 catalysts were prepared using two methods: (1) via impregnation of the required amount of ammonium heptamolybdate solution onto a NH 4   + -ZSM-5 support (having a Si/Al 2  ratio of 25) via incipient wetness, followed by drying at 120° C. for 2 hours and final calcination at 500° C. for 6 hours in flowing air, and (2) ball-milling molybdenum oxide with NH 4   + -ZSM-5 support (having a Si/Al 2  ratio of 25) for 2 hours, followed by calcination at 500° C. for 5 hours in flowing air. The molybdenum loading (wt % metal basis) was varied by changing the ammonium heptamolybdate concentration in the impregnating solution or the amount of molybdenum oxide added to milling mixture. 
     Catalytic testing of the resultant Mo/ZSM-5 catalysts was performed using a Tapered-Element Oscillating Microbalance (TEOM), allowing accurate determination of catalyst mass changes during reaction with fast response times. The catalyst (after calcination) was pelletized, crushed and sieved to 20-40 mesh particle size. Approximately 0.10 grams of sieved catalyst particles were loaded into the TEOM sample holder (0.20 cc total sample volume), and packed to form a fixed-bed using quartz wool supports. Catalyst performance for methane dehydrocyclization to benzene was performed at 800° C. and 20 psia (138 kPaa) for Runs A-B or 14.7 psia (101 kpaa) for Runs C-E in Table 1 using a feed containing specified co-feeds (CO 2 , H 2 O, H 2 ), Ar (where Ar is used as internal standard) and balance CH 4  at a weight-hourly space velocity (based on methane) as specified. The reaction effluent was analyzed using a mass spectrometer to determine the methane, benzene, naphthalene, hydrogen and argon concentrations. The rate of coke deposition on the catalyst (i.e., heavy carbonaceous deposit which does not volatize from catalyst surface) was determined directly via mass changes observed using the microbalance. The reported values for catalyst performance (e.g., benzene productivity, methane converted, benzene selectivity) are cumulative or average values for the time period beginning at methane injection and ending when the instantaneous benzene yield declines to &lt;2%. The results are shown in Table 1. 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
               
                   
               
               
                   
                   
                   
                 Average Coking Rate 
                 Benzene Productivity 
                 Methane Converted 
                 wt % Benzene 
               
               
                 Run 
                 wt % Mo 
                 Co-Feeds 
                 (wt %/h) 
                 (g Bz/g Cat) 
                 (g CH4/g Cat) 
                 Selectivity 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                 A 
                 4.6 
                 No Co-Feeds 
                 5.2 
                 0.50 
                 0.93 
                 54 
               
               
                 B 
                 4.6 
                 2% CO2. 10% H2 
                 2.2 
                 1.31 
                 2.21 
                 59 
               
               
                 C 
                 2.7 
                 No Co-Feed 
                 8.6 
                 0.23 
                 0.61 
                 38 
               
               
                 D 
                 2.7 
                 3% H2O 
                 6.0 
                 0.34 
                 0.85 
                 40 
               
               
                 E 
                 2.7 
                 20% H2 
                 3.8 
                 0.26 
                 0.49 
                 53 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     As shown in Table 1, at a Mo loading of 4.6% for Run A &amp; B, the average coke deposition rate decreased from 5.2 wt % per hour for the case with no co-feeds (i.e., feed composition of 95% CH 4 -5% Ar) to 2.2 wt % per hour for the case with 2% CO 2  and 10% H 2  co-feed (i.e., feed composition of 2% CO 2 , 10% H 2 , 83.6% CH 4  and 4.4% Ar). The benzene productivity increased from 0.5 g benzene formed per g of catalyst for no co-feed case to 1.3 g benzene per g catalyst. This demonstrates that the presence of CO 2  and H 2  co-feeds can significantly improve benzene productivity of Mo/ZSM-5 catalysts by decreasing coking rates. Run C, D and E demonstrate the effect of H 2 O and H 2  co-feeds on a catalyst comprising 2.7% Mo on ZSM-5. The average coking rate was found to decrease from 8.6 wt %/h without co-feed to 6.0 wt %/h with 3% steam co-feed, and to 3.8 wt %/h with 20% H 2  co-feed. In both cases, the benzene productivity and selectivity were found to increase with the addition of co-feed. 
     EXAMPLE 2 
     Mo/ZSM-5 catalysts were prepared using methods described earlier in Example 1. The as-synthesized catalysts were subjected to cyclic aging which consisted of (1) an on-oil period where the catalyst was exposed to CH 4  feed at 800° C. C and 14.7 psia (101 kpaa) with specified co-feeds for 5 min at specified WHSV based on CH 4  followed by (2) a regeneration period where the catalyst was heated to 850° C. and 14.7 psia (101 kpaa) under H 2  gas at 10C/min and held at 850° C. for a specified time at a GHSV of 9000 cc [STP]/g-catalyst/hr. After completion of the regeneration step, the catalyst was cooled to 800° C. before reinjection of methane feed. Prior to cyclic aging, the as-synthesized catalyst was pre-carburized by heating the catalyst in a 15% CH 4 —H 2  gas mixture from 150° C. to 800° C. at 5C/min and held at 800° C. for 1 hour. After the catalysts were subjected to a specified number of on-oil and regeneration cycles, the spent catalysts were removed and tested for performance in the TEOM. 
     Approximately 0.10 grams of the spent catalyst were loaded into the TEOM sample holder, and packed to form a fixed-bed using quartz wool supports. Catalyst performance for methane dehydrocyclization to benzene was performed at 800° C. and 14.7 psia (101 kpaa) for Runs A-D and 20 psia (138 kpaa) for Runs E-G in Table 2 using a 95% CH 4 -5% Ar feed (where Ar is used as internal standard) and at a weight-hourly space velocity of 4 g CH 4  fed per g catalyst per hour. The reaction effluent was analyzed using a mass spectrometer to determine the methane, benzene, naphthalene, hydrogen and argon concentrations. Determination of coke on catalyst was performed using temperature-programmed oxidation of spent catalyst in a Thermal Gravimetric Analyzer (TGA). 
     Table 2 compares the accumulated coke on catalyst after multiple on-oil and regeneration cycles and the residual benzene productivity of the spent catalysts. Run A-C shows the performance of 2.7% Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst after 0, 20 and 40 cycles. Run D shows the performance of 2.7% Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst after 40 cycles. Run E-G shows the performance of 4.6% Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst after 0, 50 and 389 cycles. Comparing Run C and D, it will be seen that the addition of 20% H 2  co-feed reduced the net coke deposited on the catalyst by about 55% from 2.0 wt % (for the no co-feed case) to 0.9 wt % (for 20% H 2  co-feed). In addition to decreasing coke, the benzene productivity after 40 cycles was found to be significantly higher by about 25% 
     with 20% H 2  co-feed (0.25 g benzene/g catalyst) versus no co-feed case (0.20 g benzene/g catalyst). Runs E-G demonstrate that the net accumulation of coke on catalyst can be further minimized via the addition of 2% CO 2  co-feed. After 50 cycles, the net coke on catalyst was found to be only 0.15 wt %, which is significantly lower (by about 93%) than the coke on catalyst observed after 40 cycles for the no co-feed case (i.e., 2.0 wt %), even though the feed WHSV during the on-oil period was increased from 1 to 4. After 50 cycles, no deterioration in benzene productivity was observed. After 389 cycles, the coke on catalyst was measured to be about 0.5 wt %, indicating that the net accumulation of coke on catalyst can be minimized over long-term cyclic aging. 
     EXAMPLE 3 
     Examples 3 and 4 are intended to show the effect of regeneration temperature on benzene yield in the dehydrocyclization of methane over multiple cycles. 
     A catalyst comprising about 4 wt % Mo on ZSM-5 was used to aromatize a feed comprising CH 4  86.65 mol %, C 2 H 6  1.8%, CO 2  0.9%, H 2  0.45% and Ar 10 mol %. The effluent was monitored by gas chromatography to calculate benzene yields. The catalyst was run with alternating feed for reaction, and hydrogen for regeneration, with the ratio of reaction time to regeneration time being 1:1. The reaction and regeneration conditions each included a temperature of 800° C. and a pressure of about 7 psig (149 kPaa). Benzene yields after approximately 15 minutes into the reaction period, and at several points in time after the start of the experiment, are listed below: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Time, hours 
                 Benzene yield, % of feed (carbon basis) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 4.75 
                 10.05 
               
               
                   
                 10.75 
                 7.78 
               
               
                   
                 14.75 
                 6.39 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     EXAMPLE 4 
     The process of Example 3 was repeated but with each regeneration cycle being conducted at a temperature 850° C. and a pressure of about 7 psig (149 kPaa). The reaction conditions and the ratio of reaction time to regeneration time remained as in Example 3. Benzene yields after approximately 15 minutes into the reaction period, and at several points in time after the start of the experiment, are listed below: 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Time, hours 
                 Benzene yield, % of feed (carbon basis) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 4.62 
                 11.82 
               
               
                   
                 10.30 
                 9.91 
               
               
                   
                 14.95 
                 7.98 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
            
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Cyclic Aging Conditions 
                   
                 Benzene 
                 % Change 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                 # of 
                   
                   
                   
                 Coke on Aged 
                 % Change in 
                 Productivity 
                 in Benzene 
               
               
                 Run 
                 % Mo 
                 Cycles 
                 Co-Feeds 
                 On-Oil Conditions 
                 Regen Conditions 
                 Catalyst (wt %) 
                 wt % Coke 
                 (g CH4/g Cat) 
                 Productivity 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 A 
                 2.7 
                 0 
                 n/a 
                 n/a 
                 n/a 
                 0.0 
                   
                 0.21 
                 Basis for B-D 
               
               
                 B 
                 2.7 
                 20 
                 None 
                 5 min, 1 WHSV 
                 40 min; 860 C. 
                 1.6 
                   
                 0.28 
                 33 
               
               
                 C 
                 2.7 
                 40 
                 None 
                 5 min, 1 WHSV 
                 40 min; 850 C. 
                 2.0 
                 Basis 
                 0.20 
                 −5 
               
               
                 D 
                 2.7 
                 40 
                 20% H2 
                 5 min. 1 WHSV 
                 40 min; 860 C. 
                 0.9 
                 −55 
                 0.25 
                 19 
               
               
                 E 
                 4.6 
                 0 
                 n/a 
                 n/a 
                 n/a 
                 0.00 
                   
                 0.50 
                 Basis for F 
               
               
                 F 
                 4.6 
                 50 
                 2% CO2, 25% H2 
                 5 min, 4 WHSV 
                  5 min; 850 C. 
                 0.15 
                 −93 
                 0.59 
                 18 
               
               
                 G 
                 4.6 
                 389 
                 2% CO2. 25% H2 
                 5 min. 4 WHSV 
                  5 min; 860 C. 
                 0.50 
                 −75 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     It will be seen that benzene yields in Example 4 (using a regeneration temperature of 850° C.) were higher than in Example 3 (using a regeneration temperature of 800° C.). 
     EXAMPLE 5 
     This example is intended to show that higher pressure regeneration has the benefit of improving the catalyst selectivity; that is, by increasing the selectivity to benzene and reducing the selectivity to coke production. 
     A catalyst comprising about 4 wt % Mo on ZSM-5 was used to aromatize a feed comprising CH 4  86.65 mol %, C 2 H 6  1.8%, CO 2  0.9%, H 2  0.45% and Ar 10 mol %. The effluent was monitored by gas chromatography to calculate benzene yields. The catalyst was run with alternating reaction and regeneration cycles, with the methane-containing feed being supplied to the catalyst during each 20 minute reaction cycle, and hydrogen being supplied to the catalyst during each 40 minute regeneration cycle. For the first 90% of each reaction cycle, a 20% H 2  co-feed was added to the methane-containing feed but terminated during the final 10% of each reaction cycle. The reaction pressure was about 7 psig (149 kpaa), whereas the reaction temperature was increased during each reaction cycle from an initial value of about 700° C. to a final value of about 800° C. The average temperature during each regeneration cycle was about 850° C., with the maximum temperature being 860° C. At the start of the test run, the pressure during each regeneration cycle was 34 psig (335 kpaa), and the stabilized selectivities and benzene yields are listed below. After a predetermined time, the pressure during each regeneration cycle was reduced to about 7 psig (149 kpaa) and, about 11 hours after the change in regeneration pressure, the selectivities and benzene yields were again measured and are reported below. It will be seen that the benzene selectivity and yield are higher, and coke selectivity is lower, at the higher regeneration pressure. 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 34 psig 
                 7 psig 
               
               
                   
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Benzene yield, % feed carbon 
                 10.7 
                 8.9 
               
               
                   
                 Selectivities, % feed carbon converted: 
               
               
                   
                 Benzene 
                 65.0 
                 57.1 
               
               
                   
                 Coke 
                 13.1 
                 19.5 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     EXAMPLE 6 
     This example is intended to show that, with a coke-containing Mo/HZSM-5 methane dehydrocyclization catalyst, that more coke is removable at high H 2  pressure than is removable at low H 2  pressure. 
     A 5 wt % Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst was prepared by ball-milling molybdenum oxide with NH 4   + -ZSM-5 support (having a Si/Al 2  ratio of 25) for 2 hours, followed by calcination at 500° C. for 5 hours in flowing air. The resultant catalyst was pre-carburized in 15% CH 4 /85% H 2  at 800 C and 1.2 WHSV for 1 hr in a plug flow quartz reactor. Methane conversion was performed at 800° C., 1.2 WHSV and 20 psia (138 kpaa) for methane dehydrocyclization to benzene using a 95 vol % CH 4 -5 vol % Ar feed (argon was used as an internal standard). The methane reaction was stopped after 1 hr on oil. The catalyst sample was then discharged from the reactor after cooling down to ambient temperature, and the amount of coke on the catalyst sample was measured to be about 8.9 wt % [(mass of coke)/(total mass of coke plus Mo/ZSM-5)]. 
     Approximately 100 mg of the coke-containing catalyst sample was packed into a ¼″ (6.35 mm) diameter tubular reactor. The reactor temperature was increased from ambient to about 1000° C. at a rate of 5° C./min in H 2  flowing at 50 ml/min. The methane and hydrogen concentrations in the effluent from the reactor were analyzed by an on-line GC/MS. The amount of coke gasified by hydrogen was calculated based on the concentration of methane in the effluent and the flow rate of hydrogen; no carbon species other than methane were observed. 
       FIG. 3  shows the amount of methane (mmol) evolved from the reactor while reactor temperature was ramped from ambient temperature at two different hydrogen partial pressures. It will be seen that at 20 psia (138 kpaa) hydrogen partial pressure, peak methane appeared at about 850° C. At higher hydrogen partial pressure (75 psia [517 kPaa]), the peak temperature was reduced to about 750° C. The peak intensity for methane released is much higher at 75 psia than at 20 psia, suggesting that the rate of coke removal is much faster at high pressures. More importantly, the significant reduction in peak temperature at high pressure as compared with low pressure suggests that not all the coke removed at high pressure is removable at low pressure at a given hydrogen regeneration temperature. 
     Table 3 summarizes the amount of coke (wt %) on the catalyst sample as a function of reactor temperature during the temperature programmed H 2  (TPH2) treatment. It will be seen that the amount of coke removed at higher pressure is much higher than that at low pressures at any given temperature. For example, roughly 2.6 wt % coke remained after the TPH2 at 20 psia while only 0.3 wt % coke remained at 75 psia. 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
             
               
                   
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
            
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Coke, wt % 
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                 Temp, C. 
                 20 psia 
                 75 psia 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                 297 
                 8.9 
                 8.9 
               
               
                 350 
                 8.9 
                 8.9 
               
               
                 391 
                 8.9 
                 8.9 
               
               
                 433 
                 8.9 
                 8.8 
               
               
                 475 
                 8.8 
                 8.8 
               
               
                 517 
                 8.7 
                 8.7 
               
               
                 559 
                 8.6 
                 8.5 
               
               
                 601 
                 8.5 
                 8.2 
               
               
                 643 
                 8.3 
                 7.8 
               
               
                 684 
                 8.0 
                 7.1 
               
               
                 726 
                 7.6 
                 6.0 
               
               
                 768 
                 6.9 
                 4.8 
               
               
                 810 
                 6.0 
                 3.7 
               
               
                 852 
                 5.1 
                 2.8 
               
               
                 894 
                 4.2 
                 2.1 
               
               
                 936 
                 3.5 
                 1.6 
               
               
                 977 
                 3.0 
                 1.1 
               
               
                 1019 
                 2.7 
                 0.5 
               
               
                 1030 
                 2.6 
                 0.3 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     EXAMPLE 7 
     A 2.7 wt % Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst was prepared via impregnation of ammonium heptamolybdate solution onto a NH 4   + -ZSM-5 support (having a Si/Al 2  ratio of 25) via incipient wetness, followed by drying at 120° C. for 2 hours and final calcination at 500° C. for 6 hours in flowing air. The resultant catalyst was packed into a fixed bed reactor. The temperature of the reactor was increased to 800° C. Methane was introduced at 800° C., and was allowed to contact the catalyst for 20 min at 1.2 WHSV and about 15 psia (103 kpaa) methane partial pressure. Following the 20 min contact with methane, the methane feed was switched off and hydrogen was turned on to gasify the coke on the catalyst. The duration for hydrogen gasification was 40 min at 800° C. The two steps were repeated 39 more times before the sample was discharged from the reactor following a hydrogen gasification step. The amount of coke on the catalyst sample was measured to be ˜8.7 wt % [(mass of coke)/(total mass of coke plus Mo/ZSM-5)]. 
     Approximately 100 mg of the coke-containing catalyst sample was packed into a ¼″ (6.35 mm) diameter tubular reactor. The reactor temperature was increased from ambient to about 850° C. at a rate of 5° C./min in He flowing at 50 ml/min. Hydrogen was allowed to flow through the reactor at 50 ml/min after the reactor temperature stabilized at 850° C. The methane and hydrogen concentration in the effluent from the reactor was analyzed by an on-line GC/MS. The amount of coke gasified by hydrogen was calculated based on the concentration of methane in the effluent and the flow rate of hydrogen. 
       FIG. 4  shows the concentration of coke on catalyst (wt %) as a function of hydrogen regeneration time at 850° C. at various hydrogen partial pressures. It will be seen that the initial (prior to 40 min) rate of coke gasification was much faster at higher pressures, consistent with the results shown in Example 6. In commercial applications, it is desirable to keep hydrogen regeneration time as short as possible. As a result, the significantly faster coke regeneration rate at high pressures is extremely beneficial. 
     Table 4 shows the coke concentration (wt %) at various regeneration times. It will be seen that the amount of coke remaining on the catalyst after 36 min of hydrogen regeneration at 21 psia (145 kpaa) hydrogen partial pressure and a temperature of 850° C. was 7.7 wt %, which is about 31% higher than the amount of coke remaining on catalyst (5.9 wt %) after 36 min of hydrogen regeneration at the same temperature and a hydrogen partial pressure of 105 psia (724 kPaa). 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
             
               
                 TABLE 4 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Time 
                 Pressure, psia 
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 min 
                 21 
                 45 
                 75 
                 105 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 0 
                 8.7 
                 8.7 
                 8.7 
                 8.7 
               
               
                 9 
                 8.3 
                 8.0 
                 7.7 
                 7.3 
               
               
                 18 
                 8.1 
                 7.6 
                 7.0 
                 6.6 
               
               
                 27 
                 7.9 
                 7.2 
                 6.6 
                 6.2 
               
               
                 36 
                 7.7 
                 6.9 
                 6.4 
                 5.9 
               
               
                 46 
                 7.5 
                 6.7 
                 6.2 
                 5.7 
               
               
                 55 
                 7.4 
                 6.5 
                 6.0 
                 5.6 
               
               
                 64 
                 7.2 
                 6.4 
                 5.9 
                 5.4 
               
               
                 73 
                 7.1 
                 6.3 
                 5.7 
                 5.3 
               
               
                 82 
                 7.0 
                 6.1 
                 5.6 
                 5.2 
               
               
                 91 
                 6.9 
                 6.0 
                 5.6 
                 5.1 
               
               
                 100 
                 6.8 
                 6.0 
                 5.5 
                 5.1 
               
               
                 109 
                 6.7 
                 5.9 
                 5.4 
                 5.0 
               
               
                 118 
                 6.6 
                 5.8 
                 5.3 
                 4.9 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     It is also important to note that the gasification of coke is very slow after the initial faster reduction at constant temperature (850° C.). The coke concentration curves began to level off after roughly 100 min in hydrogen. Note that there are significant differences between the amount of coke remaining on catalyst at various regeneration pressures at the end of 2 hr hydrogen regeneration. For example, the amount of coke remaining at 21 psia (145 kpaa) hydrogen partial pressure was 6.6 wt % after roughly 2 hrs regeneration in hydrogen, 35% higher than the amount coke remaining at 105 psia (724 kpaa) hydrogen partial pressure. It may take many hours of additional regeneration time at 21 psia in order to get down to the similar coke level as that at 105 psia. In practice, the results suggest that not all the coke removed at high pressures is removable at low pressures under equal temperature hydrogen regeneration conditions. 
     EXAMPLE 8 
     Mo/ZSM-5 catalysts were prepared via impregnation of required amount of ammonium heptamolybdate solution onto NH 4 ZSM-5 support (having a Si/Al 2  ratio of 28) via incipient wetness, followed by drying at 120° C. for 2 hours and final calcination at 500° C. for 6 hours in flowing air. A nominal molybdenum loading (wt. % of metal based on the total weight of the catalyst) was targeted of 2.7 wt. %; minor variations in molybdenum loadings do not affect the conclusions obtained. Each Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst sample (after calcination) was pelletized, crushed and sieved to 30-60 mesh particle size. Catalytic testing of the Mo/ZSM-5 catalysts was performed in a quartz reactor packed to form a fixed-bed using quartz wool supports. 
     Catalyst performance for methane dehydrocyclization to benzene was performed at various temperatures using a 95 wt. % CH 4 -5 wt. % argon feed (argon is used as internal standard) at a weight-hourly space velocity (based on methane) of 1.2 hr −1 . All experimental data was obtained at 138 kPa-a (20 psia) and all modeling was also performed at the same pressure. The reaction effluent was analyzed using a mass spectrometer and gas chromatograph to determine the methane, benzene, toluene, ethylene, naphthalene, hydrogen, and argon concentrations. The rate of coke deposition on the catalyst (i.e., heavy carbonaceous deposit which does not volatize from catalyst surface) was determined via carbon balance. Additional data was obtained at two temperatures (750° C. and 800° C.) with H 2  added to the feed at 6 mol % and 20 mol % respectively. 
     For the purposes of Example 8 the experimental data were consolidated to two values Sel BTN  and Sel Coke . The Sel BTN  is the average selectivity on a carbon molar basis as defined by the sum of the moles of carbon in the product present in benzene, toluene, and naphthalene divided by the moles of carbon contained in methane that reacted. The Sel Coke  is the average selectivity on a carbon molar basis as defined by the sum of the moles of carbon that remains in the reactor divided by the moles of carbon contained in methane that reacted. The sum of Sel BTN  and Sel Coke  does not equal to 100% due to the formation of other minor products, predominately ethylene. As it is often difficult to obtain accurate experimental thermodynamic conversion data, commercially available simulation software (PROII/6.0 Copyright 2003 Invensys Systems Inc.) was utilized to establish the value Conv BL . The Conv BL  is defined as the maximum thermodynamically obtainable conversion of methane to benzene and hydrogen (i.e., no model constrained so that no other products such as coke, naphthalene, ethylene, etc) at a given temperature and 138 kPa-a (20 psia) pressure. The experimental and modeling results are shown in Table 5. 
     
       
         
           
               
               
               
               
               
             
               
                 TABLE 5 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Temp 
                 H 2  Co-Feed 
                 Sel BTN   
                 Sel Coke   
                 Conv BL   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                 ° C. 
                 Mol % 
                 % C on Feed 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 600 
                 0% 
                 99% 
                 0.01%   
                 5% 
               
               
                 650 
                 0% 
                 98% 
                 0.1%  
                 8% 
               
               
                 700 
                 0% 
                 96% 
                  1% 
                 12% 
               
               
                 750 
                 0% 
                 85% 
                  9% 
                 17% 
               
               
                 750 
                 6% 
                 89% 
                  5% 
               
               
                 800 
                 0% 
                 68% 
                 24% 
                 23% 
               
               
                 800 
                 20% 
                 84% 
                  8% 
               
               
                 850 
                 0% 
                 45% 
                 46% 
                 29% 
               
               
                 900 
                 0% 
                 20% 
                 71% 
                 37% 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     It is understood that different catalyst compositions, the use of co-feeds (CO 2 , CO, H 2 O, H 2 , O 2 , ethane, propane, etc), different operating pressures, and/or different space velocities may change the selectivity and conversion numbers but that, while the exact level of improvement demonstrated by this disclosure may change, the directional improvements obtained by this disclosure will still be achieved. In addition, it is to be appreciated that, as a basis for the modeling calculations discussed below, it is assumed that the methane feed to the reactor was always preheated to the same temperature (600° C.) and in all cases a nominal feed rate of methane of 100 kilograms per hour was used. It was also used as a basis that the catalyst supplied to the moving bed reactor systems was maintained at the same temperature (850° C.). The quantity of catalyst required to maintain this temperature was calculated for each reactor configuration. For simplicity, it is assumed that the catalyst thermal conductivity, thermal diffusivity and surface emissivity remain constant. The following Table 6 lists the physical constants and catalyst properties used in the calculations. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 6 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 Model Parameters 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Catalyst Particle Density 
                 1400 
                 kg/m 3   
               
               
                   
                 Catalyst Heat Capacity 
                 1262 
                 J/kg-K 
               
               
                   
                 Catalyst Thermal Conductivity 
                 0.4 
                 W/m-K 
               
               
                   
                 Catalyst Thermal Diffusivity 
                 2.26 × 10 −7   
                 m 2 /s 
               
               
                   
                 Catalyst Surface Emissivity 
                 0.85 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     To allow modeling of various reactor configurations, equations were obtained for Sel BTN , Sel Coke , and Conv BL  by obtaining best fit polynomial equations for the above set of data points; the data points where H 2  was included in the feed were not included in the calculations of the equations. The equations obtained and the R 2  values are shown below:
 
 Sel   BTN =(1.81818181818345 E −10) T   4 −(5.41010101010501 E −07) T   3 +(5.88000000000377 E −04) T   2 −(2.78591414141575 E −01) T+ 4.97583333333585 E +01
 
 R   2   BTN =9.99810335105254 E− 01
 
 Sel   Coke =(−1.85878787878687 E −10) T   4 +(5.62280808080511 E −07) T   3 −(6.21721666666349 E −04) T   2 +(2.99664027416883 E −01) T− 5.33408809523590 E +01
 
 R   2   Coke =9.99958406639717 E− 01
 
 Conv   BL =(1.91428571428569 E −06) T   2 −(1.81714285714283 E −03) T+ 4.53357142857135 E −01
 
 R   2   BL =9.99955208049633 E −01
         where T is temperature in degrees C,   In all examples R 2  is the coefficient of determination which compares estimated and actual y-values, and ranges in value from 0 to 1. If it is 1, there is a perfect correlation in the sample—there is no difference between the estimated y-value and the actual y-value. At the other extreme, if the coefficient of determination is 0, the regression equation is not helpful in predicting a y-value. The version used here is based on an analysis of variance decomposition as follows:       

     
       
         
           
             
               R 
               2 
             
             = 
             
               
                 
                   SS 
                   R 
                 
                 
                   SS 
                   T 
                 
               
               = 
               
                 1 
                 - 
                 
                   
                     
                       SS 
                       E 
                     
                     
                       SS 
                       T 
                     
                   
                   . 
                 
               
             
           
         
       
         
         
           
             In the above definition, 
           
         
       
    
     
       
         
           
             
               
                 SS 
                 T 
               
               = 
               
                 
                   ∑ 
                   i 
                 
                 ⁢ 
                 
                   
                     ( 
                     
                       
                         y 
                         i 
                       
                       - 
                       
                         y 
                         _ 
                       
                     
                     ) 
                   
                   2 
                 
               
             
             , 
             
               
                 SS 
                 R 
               
               = 
               
                 
                   ∑ 
                   i 
                 
                 ⁢ 
                 
                   
                     ( 
                     
                       
                         
                           y 
                           ^ 
                         
                         i 
                       
                       - 
                       
                         y 
                         _ 
                       
                     
                     ) 
                   
                   2 
                 
               
             
             , 
             
               
                 SS 
                 E 
               
               = 
               
                 
                   ∑ 
                   i 
                 
                 ⁢ 
                 
                   
                     
                       ( 
                       
                         
                           y 
                           i 
                         
                         - 
                         
                           
                             y 
                             ^ 
                           
                           i 
                         
                       
                       ) 
                     
                     2 
                   
                   . 
                 
               
             
           
         
       
         
         
           
             That is, SS T  is the total sum of squares, SS R  is the regression sum of squares, and SS E  is the sum of squared errors. 
             R 2   BTN  is coefficient of determination for the Sel BTN  correlation, 
             R 2   Coke  is coefficient of determination for the Sel Coke  correlation, and 
             R 2   BL  is coefficient of determination for the Conv BL  correlation. 
           
         
       
    
     These set of equations was used to calculate the yields that would be obtained for various reactor configurations where Yield BTN  was defined as Sel BTN ×Conv BL  integrated over the temperature profile in the reactor system and Yield Coke  was defined as Sel Coke ×Conv BL  integrated over the temperature profile in the reactor system. While it is recognized and shown in the Table 5, that the byproduct H 2  improved the reaction selectivity, these equations omitted the selectivity improvement so that they provided a conservative estimate as to the level of improvement that the present process would provide. 
     Transport or Riser Reactor 
     Utilizing the above equations for a transport or riser reactor with adiabatic declining temperature with an inlet temperature of 850° C. the required catalyst circulation rate to maintain an outlet temperature of 800° C. was 3211 kilograms per hour (kg/hr) based on the nominal feed rate of methane of 100 kg/hr at 600° C. The following yields and selectivities were calculated: 
     Sel BTN =51% 
     Sel Coke =40% 
     Yield BTN =12% 
     Yield Coke =8.9% 
     ΔT Reaction =−50° C. (negative 50° C.); 
     wherein ΔT Reaction  is defined as the product outlet reaction temperature (i.e., the last temperature at which catalytic reaction occurs before the hydrocarbon product leaves the reactor system) minus the hydrocarbon feed inlet reaction temperature (i.e., the first temperature at which catalytic reaction occurs when the hydrocarbon feed enters the reactor system).
 
Fixed Bed Reactor
 
     Performing modeling of the potential fixed bed comparatives resulted in even poorer performance than with the transport or riser reactor because in the fixed bed configuration the entire heat of reaction had to be supplied by the methane containing stream (since no moving catalyst was used to supply heat to the reaction zone). Therefore the fixed bed reactor required that the methane containing stream had to be heated to a temperature much greater than the desired outlet temperature of 800° C., thereby resulting in a larger magnitude ΔT Reaction ; that is a ΔT Reaction  of −60° C. or more negative. 
     Settling Bed Reactor 
     In the case simulated for a settling bed of catalyst with an inverse temperature profile and a 50° C. approach temperature between the supplied catalyst and the process outlet temperature, the inlet was operated at 620° C. and the outlet was operated at 800° C., the catalyst circulation rate was reduced to 717 kg/hr and the reaction results were improved: 
     Sel BTN =89% 
     Sel Coke =7% 
     Yield BTN =20% 
     Yield Coke =1.5% 
     ΔT Reaction =+180° C. 
     EXAMPLE 9 
     Based on the model predicted advantages for an inverse temperature profile, a laboratory scale unit was constructed to validate the model results. While the model was oriented toward operation of the reaction system as a settling bed, the laboratory reactor was a fixed bed of catalyst with an inverse temperature profile imposed by use of external heaters. In all cases the experimentally observed conversions fell below the model predicted conversions. This may be due to laboratory scale experimental artifacts such as bed bypassing and or/back mixing due to the hydrodynamic regime in which the lab scale reactors operate. 
     Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst was prepared via ball milling of 7.5 wt % Mo (wt % of metal based on the total weight of the catalyst) as MoO 3  with NH 4 ZSM-5 support (having a Si/Al 2  ratio of 25) for 2 hr, followed by calcination at 500° C. for 5 hr in air. The catalyst was pelletized, crushed, and sieved to 20-40 mesh particle size. Catalytic testing of the Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst was performed in a fixed bed quartz reactor with an inner diameter of 7 mm and a bed length of about 18 cm. Inert quartz particles (20-50 mesh) were used as a bed diluent so that all beds were the same length. 
     Catalyst performance for methane dehydrocyclization to benzene was performed using a 95 vol % CH 4 /5 vol % Ar feed (argon was used as an internal standard). All experimental reaction data was obtained at 20 psia (138 kPa-a). The reaction effluent was analyzed using a mass spectrometer to determine product concentrations. 
     Ten separate catalyst performance experiments were conducted for comparison. In all experiments the catalyst was activated by heating in 15 vol % CH 4 /80 vol % H 2 /5 vol % Ar at 5° C./min to 800° C. and holding for 30 min. This was followed by aging the catalyst with 5 cycles of reaction and regeneration (also identical for all ten experiments). Each reaction segment lasted 20 minutes at 800° C. in 95 vol % CH 4 /5 vol % Ar feed at 1.4 hr −1  weight-hourly space velocity (WHSV) based on CH 4 . Each regeneration segment consisted of switching to H 2 , heating to 850° C. with a 10 min. hold time, then cooling back to 800° C. (total time on H 2  of 14 min.). The ten experiments differed only on their sixth reaction cycle which was run in 95 vol % CH 4 /5 vol % Ar feed for 4 hours. Conditions for the sixth cycle were selected to compare the effects of catalyst bed temperature profile at different space velocities. In particular, experiments 1 to 5 were run at WHSV values varying between 0.25 and 8 hr −1  with bed being held at isothermal conditions at 800° C. In contrast, experiments 6 to 10 were run over the same range of WHSV values but with a linear gradient in bed temperature of 650° C. at the feed inlet to 800° C. at the product outlet (inverse temperature profile). Table 7 summarizes the catalyst performance results for the ten experiments during reaction cycle #6. 
     The results in Table 7 show that there was a clear advantage for operating with an inverse temperature profile which improved instantaneous selectivity at most space velocities for shorter operation times and consistently acted to prolong selectivity to benzene over longer operation times. This allowed for greater cumulative production in comparison to an isothermal bed at all space velocities 
     While Examples 8 and 9 are directed to settling bed reactors, similar improvement in selectivity would be exhibited for other reactor systems with an equivalent inverse temperature profile. 
     As demonstrated in the simulation, the yields, selectivities, and catalyst circulation rates were improved. In addition, the entire reaction may be accomplished in a single reaction zone thereby minimizing required equipment. Optionally, two or more reaction zones may be used. 
     As illustrated by Examples 8 and 9; the settling bed configuration, or other reactor systems with a similar inverse temperature profile, enables the conversion of methane to higher hydrocarbons, e.g., aromatic compounds, at reduced aging/mechanical-attrition catalyst losses, improved operability, and higher selectivity; i.e., lower coke make; than the fixed bed, and/or transport or riser configurations. 
     EXAMPLE 10 
     This example is intended to show the effect of regeneration temperature on the stability of methane conversion and benzene+toluene selectivity in the dehydrocyclization of methane over multiple cycles. 
     A 7.5 wt % Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst was prepared by ball-milling molybdenum oxide with NH 4   + -ZSM-5 support (having a Si/Al 2  ratio of 25) for 2 hours, followed by calcination at 500° C. for 5 hours in flowing air. The catalyst was pelletized, crushed, and sieved to 20-40 mesh particle size. Catalytic testing of the Mo/ZSM-5 catalyst was performed in a fixed bed quartz reactor. Approximately 300 mg of catalyst sample was packed into a ¼″ (6.35 mm) diameter tubular reactor. Inert quartz particles (20-40 mesh) were used as bed diluent. 
     The as-synthesized catalyst was pre-carburized by heating the catalyst in a 15% CH 4 —H 2  gas mixture from 150° C. to 800° C. at 5° C./min and held at 800° C. for 0.5 hour. The catalyst was then subjected to cyclic aging which consisted of (1) an on-oil period where the catalyst was exposed to hydrocarbon feed (13.4% H 2 , 78.2% CH 4 , 1.8% CO, 1.5% C 6 H 6 , 0.2% C 2 H 4 , and 4.9% Ar; all as molar percentages) at 785° C. and 23 psia (159 kpaa) at 5 hr −1  WHSV based on CH 4  followed by (2) a regeneration period where the catalyst was heated to 850˜925° C. and 100 psia (689 kpaa) under H 2  gas for a specified time at a GHSV of 34000 cc [STP]/g-catalyst/hr. After completion of the regeneration step, the catalyst was cooled to 785° C. before re-injection of hydrocarbon feed. The effluent from the reactor was analyzed by an on-line GC and MS. 
     During the first 3670 cycles, the catalyst was exposed to hydrocarbon feed for 4 to 6 minutes at 785° C. and was regenerated under H 2  for 6 to 12 minutes at 850° C. or 875° C. for each cycle. AS the number of cycles increased, the catalyst showed increasingly rapid deterioration in methane conversion and benzene+toluene selectivity. To bring back catalyst activity, catalyst was regenerated for 12 to 23 hours 8 times during these cycles. Long regenerations were capable of temporarily reviving the catalyst but performance would quickly fall off. 
       FIGS. 5   a  and  5   b  show methane conversion (%) and benzene+toluene selectivity while the regeneration temperatures were increased from 875° C. to 925° C. After cycle 3610 the catalyst was regenerated under H 2  at 900° C. for 20 hours, then the catalyst was put back into cyclic operation and exposed to hydrocarbon feed for 4 minutes at 785° C. and was regenerated under H 2  for 12 minutes at 875° C. for each cycle from cycle 3610 to 3670. Catalysts showed rapid deterioration in methane conversion and benzene+toluene selectivity. After cycle 3670, the catalyst was regenerated under H 2  at 925° C. for 20 hours, the catalyst was then put back into cyclic operation and exposed to hydrocarbon feed for 4 minutes at 785° C. and was regenerated under H 2  for 12 minutes at 925° C. for each cycle from cycle 3680 to 3800. The catalyst showed stable methane conversion and benzene+toluene selectivity with the 925° C. regeneration temperature, demonstrating the superiority of the higher regen temperature for a more aged catalyst. 
                                                         TABLE 7                                                   Increase in           WHSV   Methane   Benzene   Benzene   Methane   Benzene   Benzene   Total Benzene   Total           (hr −1 ) for   conversion   yield (%)   selectivity   conversion   yield (%)   selectivity   Produced (g   Benzene       Exp. #   cycle 6   (%) at 1 hr   at 1 hr   (%) at 1 hr   (%) at 4 hr   at 4 hr   (%) at 4 hr   C 6 H 6 /g Catalyst)   Produced                                                                        1   0.25   17.4   10.3   60   12.5   4.5   36   0.06   Base       2   0.5   17.9   12.1   68   5.6   0.6   11   0.15   Base       3   1   17.4   11.9   68   1.1   0.0   0   0.24   Base       4   2   15.1   9.6   64   0.0   0.0   0   0.36   Base       5   8   2.0   0.4   20   0.0   0.0   0   0.38   Base       6   0.25   16.2   10.0   62   13.2   8.4   64   0.09   50%       7   0.5   16.5   11.0   67   12.6   8.3   65   0.20   33%       8   1   15.5   11.0   71   9.8   6.4   65   0.35   46%       9   2   12.2   8.2   67   3.8   2.3   60   0.44   33%       10   8   3.9   2.6   67   0.5   0.4   67   0.72   90%                    
then subjected to cyclic aging which consisted of (1) an on-oil period where the catalyst was exposed to hydrocarbon feed (13.4% H 2 , 78.2% CH 4 , 1.8% CO, 1.5% C 6 H 6 , 0.2% C 2 H 4 , and 4.9% Ar; all as molar percentages) at 785° C. and 23 psia (159 kpaa) at 5 hr −1  WHSV based on CH 4  followed by (2) a regeneration period where the catalyst was heated to 850˜925° C. and 100 psia (689 kpaa) under H 2  gas for a specified time at a GHSV of 34000 cc [STP]/g-catalyst/hr. After completion of the regeneration step, the catalyst was cooled to 785° C. before re-injection of hydrocarbon feed. The effluent from the reactor was analyzed by an on-line GC and MS.
 
     During the first 3670 cycles, the catalyst was exposed to hydrocarbon feed for 4 to 6 minutes at 785° C. and was regenerated under H 2  for 6 to 12 minutes at 850° C. or 875° C. for each cycle. AS the number of cycles increased, the catalyst showed increasingly rapid deterioration in methane conversion and benzene+toluene selectivity. To bring back catalyst activity, catalyst was regenerated for 12 to 23 hours 8 times during these cycles. Long regenerations were capable of temporarily reviving the catalyst but performance would quickly fall off. 
       FIGS. 5   a  and  5   b  show methane conversion (%) and benzene+toluene selectivity while the regeneration temperatures were increased from 875° C. to 925° C. After cycle 3610 the catalyst was regenerated under H 2  at 900° C. for 20 hours, then the catalyst was put back into cyclic operation and exposed to hydrocarbon feed for 4 minutes at 785° C. and was regenerated under H 2  for 12 minutes at 875° C. for each cycle from cycle 3610 to 3670. Catalysts showed rapid deterioration in methane conversion and benzene+toluene selectivity. After cycle 3670, the catalyst was regenerated under H 2  at 925° C. for 20 hours, the catalyst was then put back into cyclic operation and exposed to hydrocarbon feed for 4 minutes at 785° C. and was regenerated under H 2  for 12 minutes at 925° C. for each cycle from cycle 3680 to 3800. The catalyst showed stable methane conversion and benzene+toluene selectivity with the 925° C. regeneration temperature, demonstrating the superiority of the higher regeneration temperature for a more aged catalyst. 
     Alternative Embodiments 
     
         
         1. A process for converting methane to higher hydrocarbons including aromatic hydrocarbons, the process comprising:
       (a) supplying a feedstock comprising methane and a particulate catalytic material to a reaction zone;   (b) operating said reaction zone under reaction conditions effective to convert at least a portion of said methane to said higher hydrocarbon(s) and to deposit carbonaceous material on the particulate catalytic material causing catalyst deactivation;   (c) removing at least a portion of said deactivated particulate catalytic material from said reaction zone;   (d) heating at least a portion of the removed particulate catalytic material to a temperature of about 700° C. to about 1200° C. by direct and/or indirect contact with combustion gases produced by combustion of a supplemental fuel;   (e) regenerating said heated portion of said particulate catalytic material with a hydrogen-containing gas in a first regeneration zone under conditions effective to convert at least a portion of the carbonaceous material thereon to methane; and   (f) recycling at least a portion of said catalytic particulate material from (e) to said reaction zone.   
     
         2. The process of paragraph 1, wherein said reaction zone is a moving bed reaction zone. 
         3. The process of paragraph 2, wherein said moving bed reaction zone is operated with an inverse temperature profile. 
         4. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said feedstock further comprises at least one of CO, CO 2 , H 2 , H 2 O, and/or O 2 . 
         5. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said removed particulate catalytic material is heated to a temperature of about 800° C. to about 1000° C., preferably about 850° C. to about 950° C., in (d). 
         6. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said catalyst portion is contacted directly with said supplemental source of fuel or said combustion gases in said heating (d). 
         7. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said catalyst portion is heated by direct contact with an inert medium or a heat exchange surface heated by said combustion gases. 
         8. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said supplemental source of fuel comprises a hydrocarbon and/or hydrogen. 
         9. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said supplemental source of fuel comprises methane. 
         10. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said supplemental source of fuel comprises a hydrocarbon and said hydrocarbon is burned in an oxygen-lean atmosphere to produce synthesis gas. 
         11. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said supplemental source of fuel comprises hydrogen. 
         12. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said supplemental source of fuel comprises hydrogen generated as a by-product of the process. 
         13. The process of any preceding paragraph, and further comprising:
       (g) removing a further portion of said particulate catalytic material from said reaction zone;   (h) heating said further portion of the particulate catalytic material by direct and/or indirect contact with combustion gases produced by combustion of a supplemental fuel; and   (i) at least part of said catalytic particulate material from (h) to said reaction zone.   
     
         14. The process of any preceding paragraph, and further comprising:
       (i) transferring a second portion of the removed catalytic particulate material from (c) or (e) to a second regeneration zone;   (ii) regenerating said second portion of the catalytic particulate material with a hydrogen containing gas in said second regeneration zone under conditions, including a pressure different from the pressure in the first regeneration zone, effective to convert at least part of the carbonaceous materials on the catalytic particulate material to methane; and   (iii) recycling at least a portion of said regenerated catalytic particulate material from (g) to said reaction zone.   
     
         15. The process of paragraph 14, wherein said conditions in said regenerating (ii) include a pressure of at least 500 kPaa, preferably between about 1000 kPaa and about 5000 kPaa. 
         16. The process of paragraph 14 or paragraph 15, wherein the pressure in the second regeneration zone is achieved by means of a vertical column of said particulate catalytic material. 
         17. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said conditions in said regenerating (e) include a pressure of at least 100 kPaa, preferably between about 150 kPaa and about 5000 kPaa. 
         18. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein the pressure in the first regeneration zone is achieved by means of a vertical column of said particulate catalytic material. 
         19. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said reaction conditions in said reaction zone in (b) include a temperature of about 400° C. to about 1200° C., a pressure of about 1 kPa-a to about 1000 kPa-a, and a weight hourly space velocity of about 0.01 hr −1  to about 1000 hr −1 . 
         20. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said catalytic particulate material is a dehydrocyclization catalyst comprising a metal or compound thereof on an inorganic support. 
         21. The process of any preceding paragraph, wherein said catalytic particulate material comprises at least one of molybdenum, tungsten, rhenium, a molybdenum compound, a tungsten compound, a zinc compound, and a rhenium compound on ZSM-5, silica or an aluminum oxide. 
         22. A process for converting methane to higher hydrocarbons including aromatic hydrocarbons, the process comprising:
       (a) supplying a feedstock comprising methane to a reaction zone containing a particulate catalytic material;   (b) operating said reaction zone under reaction conditions effective to convert at least a portion of said methane to said higher hydrocarbon(s) and to deposit carbonaceous material on the particulate catalytic material causing catalyst deactivation;   (c) discontinuing the supply of methane containing feedstock to said reaction zone;   (d) heating said reaction zone to a regeneration temperature of 700° C. to 1200° C. by direct and/or indirect contact with combustion gases produced by combustion of a supplemental fuel;   (e) regenerating said particulate catalytic material in said heated reaction zone with a hydrogen-containing gas under conditions effective to convert at least a portion of the carbonaceous material thereon to methane; and   (f) re-establishing supply of methane containing feedstock to said reaction zone.   
     
         23. The process of paragraph 22, wherein the supply of methane containing feedstock is discontinued after said heating (d). 
         24. The process of paragraph 22 or paragraph 23, wherein said heating (d) is conducted in the presence of a hydrogen-containing gas. 
         25. The process of any one of paragraphs 22 to 24, wherein said reaction zone is a fixed bed reaction zone. 
         26. The process of any one of paragraphs 22 to 25, wherein said conditions in said regenerating (e) include a pressure of at least 100 kPaa. 
       
    
     While the present invention has been described and illustrated by reference to particular embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the invention lends itself to variations not necessarily illustrated herein. For this reason, then, reference should be made solely to the appended claims for purposes of determining the true scope of the present invention.