Patent Publication Number: US-6667645-B1

Title: Pulsed clock signal transfer circuits with dynamic latching

Description:
FIELD 
     The present invention relates, generally, to the field of signal transfer clocking circuits and, more particularly, to logic signal transfer circuits employing phase/pulse clocking methodology, including, although not limited thereto, pulsed clock gated logic circuits in processors (e.g., microprocessors). 
     BACKGROUND 
     Recently, there has been realized significant achievements in scaling down of the sizes so of active elements in semiconductor integrated circuits (ICs), in the level of integration of an IC chip and, also, in the scaling down of the supply voltages of IC chips, as well as in the voltage/current levels assigned to logic levels of integrated circuits. Such developments have been particularly noticeable in CMOS (Complementary Metal-Oxide Semiconductor) technology, which has led to the development of single-chip processors (i.e., microprocessors) with ever increasing clocking speeds. However, as the channel length Leff (effective channel length) is lowered below 0.2 microns, it becomes more and more difficult to reduce gate delay, due to mobility reduction and series resistance limitations. Therefore, with increasing clock frequency in microprocessors, the clock inaccuracy becomes a significant percentage of the clock period. It is critical, therefore, that we account for the clock inaccuracy in connection with the transfer of data (e.g., logic signals) in the die (processor chip). For example, you may have a global clock tree distribution in which similar generated clocks may not arrive at the end of the distribution clock tree at exactly the same time for a number of reasons, including that the component elements are not perfectly matched throughout the chip. There may be faster components at one location of the chip than at another, or you may have a drop in the power supply at one location of the chip and not at another, which would cause a difference in delay in signal propagation. 
     Basically, the clock inaccuracy consists of two components, namely, clock skew and clock jitter. Clock jitter can be noticed when monitored on an oscilloscope in which the thickness of the rising edges (bands) represents the extent of excursion of the clock edges from the nominal timings and is referred to as the peak-to-peak jitter. There is also clock skew which represents the spacial separation effect of the clock inaccuracy. An example of this is shown in FIGS. 19A and 19B in which two clocks, namely, ClkA and ClkB, are generated by the same source and are designed for equal delay T 0 . However, the two paths which include equal numbers of series-connected logic inverters (e.g., CMOS inverters) are disposed over two different locations on the die. For example, assume that path B is laid out next to large bus drivers (with a high activity factor) in which case the supply voltage may be lower than that for the devices in path A, which neighbors only small gates with very low activity factor. Further, assume that the channel lengths of the MOSFETs (Metal-Oxide Semiconductor Field-Effect Transistors) in path B came out to be longer than nominal because of some optical distortion from defects in the lens, while devices in path A were unaffected. Obviously, the delay T B  through path B will be longer than the designed nominal delay T 0 , while the delay T A , through path A, will be shorter than delay T 0 . The skew between the two clocks is then the difference T B −T A , as is clearly seen from the timing diagram in FIG.  19 B. In general, skew can also be between two paths of designed unequal delays. Using CMOS technology as an example, there are a number of reasons contributing to clock skew, including but not limited to (1) threshold voltage variation of MOS transistors across the die; (2) interlayer dielectric thickness variation; (3) design errors; (4) supply voltage variation across the die; (5) temperature difference across the die; (6) signal coupling to neighboring lines; and (7) variation in the effective channel length of MOS devices across the die. 
     With regard to the phenomena of clock skews, the potential for realizing a race condition resulting from min-delay (minimum delay) becomes even more pronounced with attempts at achieving higher and higher processor clocking speeds. For example, assume you have a generator block including a first logic circuit with plural signal paths and a receiver block including a second logic circuit and that each of those blocks is controlled by clock signals generated by different local clock generators. Assume also the presence of clock skew as a result of any one or more of the number of reasons discussed above. Thus, if the local clock generators associated with the first logic circuit generate clock signals faster than that of the local clock generators associated with the second logic circuit, in the receiving block, the signals may arrive at their destination faster than desirable and potentially may race through the receiving block. This can cause inaccurate operation (e.g., glitches or spurous transitions, etc.) of the individual logic circuits and, therefore, of the overall circuitry in the die. In fact, such, min-delay race conditions can adversely affect the development of higher and higher processor clocking speeds. 
     SUMMARY 
     A signal transfer clocking circuit has a first stage including a first latch and a first, non-clocking circuit in series therewith. The first latch has a data input and is opened in response to a first level of a pulse clock signal applied thereto to effect transfer of incoming data through the first stage in a first phase of operation of the signal transfer clocking circuit. The signal transfer clocking circuit further has a second stage including a second, dynamic latch and at least a second circuit in series therewith. The dynamic latch has a data input, coupled to an output of the first circuit, and is opened in response to a second level of a same or different pulse clock signal applied thereto as that applied to the first latch to effect a transfer of data generated by the first stage, through the second stage, to at least one succeeding circuit in a second, successive phase of operation of the signal transfer clocking circuit. The succeeding circuit is opened and closed by a clock signal having phase and frequency characteristics linked to that applied to the dynamic latch. (An opened latch refers to a latch in an ON-state, namely, a conducting state; a closed latch refers to a latch in an OFF-state, namely, a non-conducting state.) 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING(S) 
     The foregoing and a better understanding of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description of the illustrated embodiments and the claims when read in connection with the accompanying drawings, all forming a part of the disclosure of this invention. While the foregoing and following written and illustrated disclosure focuses on disclosing example embodiments of the invention, it should be clearly understood that the same is by way of illustration and example only and is not limited thereto. The spirit and scope of the present invention are limited only by the terms of the appended claims. 
     The following represents brief descriptions of the drawings, wherein: 
     FIG. 1 is a logic circuit having pulse clocked dynamic latching according to a first embodiment of a signal transfer clocking circuit of the present invention; 
     FIG. 2 is an example illustration showing the operation of the circuit in FIG. 1 using examples for the applied clock pulse signals and data at various points (nodes) along the circuit; 
     FIG. 3 is a logic circuit having pulse clocked dynamic latching according to a modification of the first embodiment of a signal transfer clock circuit of the present invention; 
     FIG. 4 is a logic circuit having pulse clocked dynamic latching according to another modification of the first embodiment of a signal transfer clocking circuit of the present invention; 
     FIGS.  5 (A) and  5 (B) show examples of a p-first static latch and an n-first static latch, respectively, as applied to signal transfer clocking circuits of FIGS. 1,  3  and  4 , as well as in all other examples disclosed in the present application; 
     FIGS.  6 (A) and  6 (B) are examples of a p-first dynamic latch and an n-first dynamic latch, respectively, applied to the various examples disclosed of the signal transfer clocking circuit according to the present invention; 
     FIG. 7 is a conceptual block diagram of a clocking mechanism in a single-chip processor (microprocessor) such as for advanced clocking speeds even up to the GHz range to which the present invention is applicable; 
     FIG. 8 shows an example of the binary tree for the global clock distribution in a processor chip of the global clocking mechanism conceptualized in FIG. 7; 
     FIG. 9 shows an example of the general principle of the global clock distribution network and its relation to unit/fub clocks which are used as examples only of clock generators providing the pulse clock signals applicable to the present invention; 
     FIG. 10 shows examples of the different types of clocks that are associated with the unit/fub clock generators in a global clocking scheme for a high-speed processor to which the present invention is applicable; 
     FIG. 11 shows an example of waveforms corresponding to the clocks shown in FIG. 10, which relate to the global clock distribution scheme in FIG. 7 of the drawings; 
     FIG. 12 is an explanatory waveform diagram showing the distinguishing differences between a normal clock signal and a pulse clock signal such as it relates to the various core clocks associated with the clocking scheme to which the present invention is applied to, as one example; 
     FIG. 13 is an example of a logic circuit having pulse clocked dynamic latching according to a second embodiment of a signal transfer clocking circuit of the present invention; 
     FIG. 14 is an example of a logic circuit having pulse clocked dynamic latching according to a third embodiment of a signal transfer clocking circuit of the present invention; 
     FIG. 15 is an example of a logic circuit having pulse clocked dynamic latching according to a fourth embodiment of a signal transfer clocking circuit of the present invention; 
     FIG. 16 is an example of a logic circuit having pulse clocked dynamic latching according to a fifth embodiment of the signal transfer clocking circuit of the present invention; 
     FIG.  17 ( a )- 17 ( b ) are an example of a logic circuit having pulse clocked dynamic latching according to a sixth embodiment of a signal transfer clocking circuit of the present invention; 
     FIGS.  18 (A),  18 (B) and  18 (C) show examples of a CMOS inverter, a CMOS NAND logic gate and a CMOS NOR logic gate, respectively; and 
     FIGS. 19A and 19B are an example of a schematic circuit diagram and a corresponding waveform diagram, respectively, of a two path clock signal generator with clock skew therebetween. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     In the detailed description of the disclosed embodiments, in terms of relating the same to the present invention, it should be noted that like reference numerals/characters in different drawing illustrations are used to designate identical, corresponding or similar components. Further, the drawing illustrations are not drawn to scale and, also, well-known power connections, as well as other circuit components, which are connectable to the embodiments illustrated, are not all shown within the various examples of the invention illustrated for simplicity of illustration and discussion, and so as not to obscure the invention. It should also be noted, the examples disclosed (described and illustrated in this application) are not limited to the clock signals or circuits employed herein nor to a processor (microprocessor) which employ such a global clock distribution scheme as that mentioned herein. Also, although the examples used herein feature CMOS type construction, namely, CMOS static/dynamic latching, CMOS logic gates (CMOS gates), etc., which typifies that in Intel processors, it should not be considered as being limited thereto. 
     FIG. 1 is a first embodiment which features a signal transfer clocking circuit  10  as one example, namely, a logic circuit having a pulse clocked dynamic latch which provides a skew-tolerant operation. According to this circuit, min-delay (minimum delay) race violations are prevented through employing a dynamic latch such as a p-first dynamic latch  13  which is, in this example, a simple CMOS clock transmission gate, although not limited thereto. The dynamic latch is referred to as a p-first dynamic latch because the pulse clock ck 0 m 1 p 38  is asserted on the P-side of the dynamic latch, that is, pulse clock ck 0 m 1 p 38  is directly applied to the P-channel MOSFET while the complement thereof is applied to the N-channel MOSFET of the CMOS transmission gate. This is depicted in FIG. 6A of the drawings in which the do CMOS transmission gate (or simply CMOS gate) is represented by reference numeral  60  and a CMOS inverter is represented by reference numeral  61 . According to this example, when pulse clock ck 0 m 1 p 38  is at a logic high level (or level H), the p-first dynamic latch  13  is closed, i.e., it is in a closed mode, namely, a non-conducting (OFF) state. That is, data signals are prevented from propagating through the p-first dynamic latch  13 . Only when the p-first dynamic latch is opened, i.e., it is in an open mode, namely, a conducting (ON) state, can any of the signals from the first phase of the logic operation propagate through the second stage (which is inclusive of the p-first dynamic latch  13  and the logic circuitry in block  14 ) to a succeeding stage which is inclusive of static latch  15  and any logic circuitry associated therewith. It is important that the circuit is provided with a p-first dynamic latch from the standpoint of not wanting to have signals propagating too fast to the circuitry at logic block  14  and, therefore, also, through static latch  15 , to any other receiving stage. This p-first dynamic latch blocks logic signals from propagating through the rest of the logic circuitry too quickly. 
     According to the invention, only when the dynamic latch (e.g., CMOS gate) is opened will any of the signals from the preceding gates including the first stage thereof, which is inclusive of the static latch  11  and logic block  12 , propagate to the second stage and any further succeeding stage. Said differently, the p-first dynamic latch  13  delays transmission of the fastest arriving signals until the relatively slower signals have also arrived. You want to make sure that the slowest propagating logic signals will have reached their destination in a timely manner. Therefore, through employing a scheme such as that illustrated in FIG. 1 of the drawings, min-delay race violation can be minimized or, practically speaking, substantially prevented. Typically, in a die there exist both fast and slow paths running through logic circuitry and in the case of a max-delay (maximum delay) race you are concerned about the slowest paths and in the case of min-delay (minimum delay) racing of signals, you are concerned about the fastest propagation path. The purpose of the dynamic latches, according to the present invention, which are, for example, clocked CMOS gates (or clocked CMOS transmission gates), is to minimize racing violations, namely, minimize min-delay race violations. In this connection, you do not want the signals (i.e., fast signals) changing state too quickly since this would lead to propagation errors (e.g. glitches, etc.) of the data being transmitted to subsequent stages as well as undesired excess consumption of power. 
     In FIG. 1, you will note a vertical line FB, which refers to a fub boundary. This is an imaginary line and is simply a representation that the left side and right side portions thereof represent separate blocks of circuitry or separate functional units in the die, in which each such separate circuit or functional unit has its own phase/frequency clock requirements. Accordingly, each such block of circuitry or functional unit has its own separate clock generated by a local clock generator, namely, a unit or fub clock generator. Such need for a fub clock can arise in semiconductor chips having large numbers of circuits with specific clocking requirements, especially, in microprocessors. Typically, a main timing generator is employed in semiconductor chips through which a number of different clock signals are produced, either at the same or at different locations on the die. In microprocessors, global clock distribution schemes are employed with regard to the implementation of large numbers of clocks for operating the processor. In order to see this more clearly including in terms of the example given in FIG. 1 of the drawings, as well as with regard to the examples in the other embodiments disclosed in this application, the following discussion directed to a clock distribution scheme of microprocessors is being provided. 
     FIG. 7 of the drawings is a block diagram conceptualizing a clocking mechanism in a single-chip processor (microprocessor) such as for advanced clocking speeds (in present as well as the next and future generation processors) even up to the multiple GHz range to which the present invention is applicable. This processor clock network  70  consists, essentially, of three major blocks: (a) the PLL (phase-locked loop) block  71  which synthesizes the chip clock from an OFF-chip system clock, (b) the global clock distribution block  72  which distributes the clock generated in the PLL block to all of the units and fubs and (c) a unit and fub clock generator  73  which generates the appropriate style, frequency and phase of clocks for the fub. The global clock distribution network  72  is part of the global clock unit, whereas the unit/fub clock generators are part of the individual units which may be remotely situated therefrom, on the die. According to such a scheme, the global clock signal (gclk#signal) is partitioned into a large number of domain clocks, although only a small number are shown for purposes of illustration in FIG. 7 of the drawings. Each unit (fub) receives one or more domain clocks for generating local fub clocks, in which one or more units can be associated with the same domain clock. In fact, each domain clock can be considered as a global clock (gclk) within that domain since it can be associated with a plurality of unit/fub clock generators. This can be seen with regard to the binary tree  81  for the global clock distribution of a microprocessor  80  in FIG. 8 of the drawings, in which  82  represents a unit/fub clock generator and gclk represents a local global clock signal, and from FIG. 9 of the drawings, the latter showing, through a simplified clock network diagram, the concept of using a domain clock to generate a plurality of fub clocks. 
     From these general diagrams, which are to be considered as an example showing of the concept of global clock distribution for a large number of domains in an advanced generation processor chip, applicable to the present invention, delay path balancing can be maximized therefor, although up to a point. That is, propagation delay path imbalances throughout the entirety of the clocking network can be minimized through using balanced tree topologies, such as shown in FIG. 8, rather than simply cascaded or chains of topologies. However, as the demand for greater and greater clocking speeds of ordinary memory chips and the like and, in particular, of microprocessors increases, any such slight differences in the formation of different signal lines carrying logic signals or clock signals, including with regard to the environmental condition at the portion of the chip or die associated with those signal lines, can lead to min-delay race conditions which must be treated in order to avoid problems such as glitches, which is a spurious transition resulting from an imbalance in the paths of the input signals of, for example, a single CMOS gate or any CMOS combinatorial logic block, in general. With regard to the FIG. 9 diagram, clock ck 1 m 1 n 10  is one representative example describing a domain clock. Such domain clock can be associated with one or a group of unit/fub clocks including, for example, pulse clocks ck 0 m 1 p 38  and ck 1 m 1 p 38  of FIG. 1, the latter two having the same phase and frequency characteristics but are associated with separate fub clock generators. However, because of possible slight differences in propagation delays between the signal lines associated therewith, the pulse clock signals of these fub clocks may not start at exactly coincident times. In fact, even relative delays in the single-digit picosecond (ps) range become noticeable as processor clocking speeds become higher and higher. The alphanumeric convention used in describing the domain clocks as well as the fub clocks, such as those being used with regard to the example embodiments disclosed herein, will be described with regard to FIGS. 10 and 11 of the drawings. 
     FIG. 10 is an example illustration of the core clocks associated with an advanced microprocessor clocking scheme to which the present invention is applicable, although not limited thereto. Examples of the noted fub clock signals and their relationship to a reference clock and a corresponding domain clock ck 0 m 1 n 10  of such a clocking scheme are shown in the waveform diagram in FIG. 11 of the drawings. Take for example the domain clock signal ck 0 m 1 n 10 . The ck 0  identifies which domain or group of unit/fub clock generators it relates to; the letter m refers to a medium frequency clock signal in that processor, the numeral  1  following the letter m is indicative of a phase  1  clock, the letter n identifies that it is a normal clock, the numeral  1  in number  10  identifies the number of inverted gate delays of the leading edge of that domain clock from the leading edge of the 50% duty cycle reference clock while the  0  in the number  10  is indicative of the number of inverted gate delays of the falling edge of this domain clock from the falling edge of the reference clock. Similarly, pulse clock signal ck 0 m 1 p 38 , which is used in the example in FIGS. 1,  3 ,  4 , etc., in the drawings, is explained as follows. ck 0  is a uniquely identified clock signal of a unit/fub clock generator associated with a domain having the just-described clock ck 0 m 1 n 10 . The letter m represents a medium clock frequency, numeral  1  indicates that it is a phase  1  type signal, the letter p identifies this clock signal as a pulse clock signal, numeral  3  represents the number of inverted gate delays of the rising (leading) edge from the rising (leading) edge of the reference clock and the number  8  represents the number of inverted gate delays of the trailing edge of this clock from rising (leading) edge of the reference clock. In terms of understanding this more clearly, FIG. 12 is provided as a showing of the differences in meaning between that of a normal clock, pulse clock, phase  1  clock and the phase  2  clock. As one can clearly see, a normal clock is one in which the rising (leading) and falling (trailing) edges of that clock are generated off of the leading and trailing edges of a corresponding reference clock, respectively. The pulse width of the normal clock, therefore, is a function of the pulse width of the reference clock. On the other hand, a pulse clock is one in which the rising and falling edges of that clock are generated off the same edge of the reference clock. Therefore, the pulse width of the pulse clock is not a function of the pulse width nor of the frequency of the reference clock. That is, a pulse clock can be considered as being a one-shot clock reference from one of the leading and trailing edges of a reference clock. The above-referred-to domain clock can be considered as one of a number of global clocks of that processor. Incidentally, normal clock signal ck 0 m 1 n 33  is a 50% duty cycle clock used in SRTL (Structural Register Transfer Logic), i.e., it is specific to the logic architecture. 
     In FIGS. 10 and 11 you will note clock signals with the letters s, m and f. They represent the frequency identifiers of those clocks. For example, the letter s corresponds to a slow clock which can mean 450 MHz clock associated with an advanced generation processor developed by Intel or 300 MHz clock with regard to a relatively lower speed processor. The letter m is indicative of a medium frequency clock such as 900 MHz clock, with regard to the advanced generation processor, or a 600 MHz clock, with regard to the relatively lower speed processor. The letter f is indicative of a fast clocking speed such as 1.8 GHz clock with regard to the advanced processor or 1.2 GHz clock with the less advanced speed processor. Examples of these are depicted in FIG. 11 of the drawings, in which the pitch associated with the vertical markings at the top end of the diagram corresponds to two inverter (of the CMOS type) gate delays, as one example. It should be noted, each new generation of processors changes the ranges of frequencies associated with slow, medium and fast clocks. The values given herein are strictly examples only and are not to be considered as being limited thereto. 
     There are a number of reasons for having separate domain clocks. For one, it may be desirable for different parts of the processor, for example, different portions of a pipeline of stages, to be enabled at different times. That is, you may want to sequentially turn clocks on and off in order to save power, i.e., using clocks only when they are actually doing work and not just running all the time. Also, it may be difficult to maintain the same clock to have the same characteristics in view of distances between fubs. That is a basic reason why global distribution of clocks is in the form of a clock tree, as described earlier. For example, clocks arriving at near the ends of that distribution clock tree may not arrive at exactly the same time as that of similarly corresponding clocks because of, for example, a mismatch of devices (e.g., faster/slower devices on different sides of the chip) or droops in power supply at one side of the chip and not in the other side of the chip, etc. Such undesirable influences result in clock skews which are reflective of delays in signal propagation times. When clock skews occur, there is a greater propensity for occurrence in a race condition (e.g., minimum delay race violation). If a first clock generator which controls an upstream pipestage is generating the clock faster than a second clock generator which controls a downstream pipestage, it means that the signals are going to arrive at the downstream pipestage faster than desired. This can potentially result in racing through the receiving latch of the downstream pipestage. Therefore, margins are needed in order to protect the circuit operation against those kinds of races. This is where use of a dynamic latch, such as a basic CMOS transmission gate (or, simply, a CMOS gate), can guarantee the necessary delay up to that point in time to prevent racing through subsequent stages along the pipeline of logic signal/data transmission. That is, nothing can be transmitted faster than the cycle time of the pulse clock signal of the strategically placed dynamic latch. Incidentally, the benefits of using a CMOS type dynamic latch are also considerable. For one, the number of components employed is relatively low when compared to other types of latches. Secondly, by using a CMOS gate, in which the P-and N-channel MOSFETs are connected in channel-to-channel parallel, the ON-resistance is minimal. Thirdly, a CMOS gate can pass both a logic high and a logic low data signal without any threshold voltage drop. That is, effectively, there is no loss of signal during the open mode of a CMOS gate. 
     Turning again to the example of the invention featured in FIG. 1 of the drawings, the p-first dynamic latch  13  is employed to lock off any signal transmission from propagating to the logic block  14  and to the succeeding, receiving fub which, in this example, is opened using a static latch  15 . According to the present invention, application of a dynamic latch such as a p-first dynamic latch  13 , which is typified by a clock CMOS transmission gate, although it is not to be considered as being limited thereto, for performing a fully latching function is quite advantageous in terms of component transistor elements needed, as noted above, and the fact that it is amenable to pulse clocking. That is, a fully latching function can be achieved through using a dynamic latch such as a CMOS gate because of the availability of pulse clocking. On the other hand, employing a latching scheme responding to a symmetric phase  1  and phase  2  normal clock, the closing/opening of a latching gate would be limited only to either the first or the second phase of the normal clock. Through using pulse clocks, however, the clock could be stopped during either the phase  1  or the phase  2 . Clock signal ck 0 m 1 p 38  is a pulse clock associated with the generating fub (corresponding to the left portion of the fub boundary FB) and clock signal ck 1 m 1 p 38  is applied to the receiving fub (corresponding to the right portion of the fub boundary FB) in FIG.  1 . From the earlier explanation, these clock signals are medium frequency pulse clock signals and have the same phase and frequency but which are associated with different domain clocks. 
     As you can see from FIG. 2 of the drawings, the pulse clock ck 1 m 1 p 38  applied to the receiving fub may be somewhat delayed such as by one inverted gate, as one example, although not limited thereto, as a result of the presence of a clock skew associated with the global clock/domain clock signal network thereof. Assuming a data signal d 0  arrives at the input side of the n-first static latch about two CMOS inverter gate delays subsequently to the leading edge of pulse clock ck 0 m 1 p 38 , as shown in FIG. 2, examples of arrival times as it relates to signals d 2 , d 4  and d 5  in FIG. 1 are shown in FIG. 2, although not limited thereto. From FIG. 2, it is noted that p-first dynamic latch  13  does not become open (set in an ON-state) until the logic signals have arrived to logic block  12 . Also, the pulse width associated with the ON-state of p-first dynamic latch is sufficiently wide to cover any inverted gate delay associated with logic block  12 , for example, up to  6  gate delays, when using a clocking scheme of a medium speed and pulse width as that shown and as explained earlier, although not limited thereto. From FIG. 2, the data d 5  does not arrive until the next pulsing of clock pulse ck 1 m 1 p 38 , which is slightly delayed from the ck 0 m 1 p 38  clock pulse. From FIG. 2 of the drawings, one can clearly see that p-first dynamic latch  13  minimizes any racing between the generating portion and the receiving portion of logic circuits and the like in the die. 
     As explained earlier, FIGS. 5B and 6A are examples of n-first static latch and p-first dynamic latch of the CMOS variety employed in the embodiment of FIG. 1, although not necessarily limited thereto. Similar results can also be achieved through using a p-first static latch and an n-first dynamic latch of the CMOS variety, such as illustrated in FIGS. 5A and 6B in place of the n-first static and p-first dynamic latches of FIG. 1, respectively. Such a modified example is illustrated in FIG. 3, in which blocks  11 ′- 15 ′ of signal transfer clocking circuit  10 ′ correspond to the similarly numbered blocks in FIG.  1 . As a further modification of FIG. 1, both the static latch as well as the dynamic latch can be of the N-type in which case a logic inverter such as of the CMOS type, although not limited thereto, would separate the incoming clock signal applied to the gate of the N-channel MOSFET of the dynamic latch with that applied directly to the N-channel MOSFET of the static latch. This can be seen with regard to FIG. 4 of the drawings in which blocks  11 ″- 15 ″ of signal transfer clocking circuit  10 ″ correspond to the similarly numbered blocks in FIG.  1 . Likewise, rather than both the static as well as the dynamic latches being of the n-first type, they can both be of the p-first type with an inverter separating the application of the clock pulse to the respective P-channel MOSFETs thereof. Similarly as with regard to the embodiment in FIG. 1 of the drawings, the modified versions thereof in FIGS. 2 and 3 operate in a similar such manner as that shown by the waveforms in FIG. 2 of drawings, although not limited thereto. 
     With the dynamic latch clocking methodology employed herein, the logic circuitry of the generating portion, for example, logic block  12 , can consist of static logic gates such as of the CMOS variety, although not limited thereto. Logic block  12  can also be in the form of any CMOS combinatorial logic circuit and in the case of frequencies such as that discussed above, as one example, there can be up to  6  gate delays, covering propagation through the static latch  11  in conjunction with the logic block  12 . Also, rather than having a static latch  15  which is similar to that of static latch  11 , dynamic logic circuits such as of the domino logic circuit variety can also be used. In fact, a domino logic circuit can be used in place of static latch  15  and any combinatorial static logic circuits of that receiving fub. 
     It should also be emphasized, according to the present invention and consistent with FIGS. 1,  3  and  4  as well as with regard to the further embodiments to be subsequently discussed, a phase  2  clock is not required because the dynamic latch is driven from the phase  1  pulse clock. Also, dynamic latch  13  can be driven either by the generating clock ck 0 m 1 p 38  or, for that matter, by the pulse clock ck 1 m 1 p 38  of the receiving fub. This is depicted in FIG. 13 of the drawings in which, it is noted, the fub boundary between the generating and receiving portions is at the input side of the p-first dynamic latch. FIG. 13 similarly shows first and second stages in which a first stage is inclusive of static latch  131  and logic block  132  and the second stage is inclusive of p-first dynamic latch  133 , logic block  134  and static latch  135 . With regard to this embodiment, the dynamic latch has its clock coming from the receiver side clock generator, which is actually a safer solution for minimizing min-delay race violations. In fact, it is actually a more preferred solution in that you are guaranteed, for all practical purposes, to prevent any racing. This is because the local clock generator or fub clock generator as well as wiring connections at the receiver side (i.e., to the right of fub boundary) including that pertaining to the clock input of the CMOS transmission gate of the dynamic latch  133  are localized within the receiver side. In this connection, it is noted that the fub clock ck 1 m 1 p 38  of the static latch  135  is also directly applied to the P-channel MOSFET of the p-first dynamic latch  133 , which is also located on the receiver side. 
     Another example which can be considered as somewhat closely related to that of FIG. 13 is illustrated in FIG. 14 of the drawings. According to the embodiment in FIG. 14,  141  represents a static latch,  142  and  144  can be considered as logic blocks each consisting of five CMOS static gates (e.g.,  142   1 ,. . . ,  142   5 ). Alternatively, each CMOS static gate can constitute a separate logic block. This embodiment also includes a p-first dynamic latch  143  (associated with the second phase of operation of the clocking circuit but which is clocked by a phase  1  clock pulse) and static latch  145 , similarly as that depicted in FIG. 13 of the drawings. In FIG. 14, however, the p-first dynamic latch  143  is opened/closed by a fub pulse clock tied to either the sender or receiver phase  1  clock pulse, the sender phase  1  clock pulse opening/closing static latch  141  while the receiver phase  1  clock pulse opens/closes static latch  145 . As you can see from this illustration, the first phase is limited to a gate delay of six CMOS static inverting circuits, five of which correspond to logic portion  142  and the sixth of which is included in the static latch  141 , such as shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B, although not limited thereto. That is, the six inverter gate delays associated with the sender phase  1  operation is about one phase worth of logic, i.e., the six inverter gate delays are the number of gate delays that can be combined into one phase worth of logic signal flow. This is consistent with that permitted by medium frequency type clock domains such as that corresponding to the present examples. With regard to FIG. 14, the latch is a p-first dynamic latch (i.e., a pass gate such as a CMOS transmission gate only [without the keeper], with the P-channel MOSFET of the pass gate connected directly to the input clock). As to the fub boundaries, in terms of effecting a proper allocation of clocks to individual fubs, the determination is often made on the basis of how the logic circuitry is divided along the fub boundary. With regard to FIGS. 1,  3  and  4 , noting that the dynamic latch  13  is associated with the generating fub, which may be considerably distant from the receiving fub clock generator, it would be impractical to route the receiving pulse clock ck 1 m 1 p 38  to the dynamic latch  13  of the generating fub. On the other hand, the dynamic latch  133  in FIG. 13 can be clocked by the pulse clock of the receiving fub noting that its proximity is more in line with the receiving fub. That is, the boundary is naturally occurring before the p-first dynamic latch; therefore, an effective practical connection can be made from the receiving pulse clock generator to the p-first dynamic latch. Generally, the boundary (fub boundary FB) is defined by where the circuit components separate in terms of clock signal requirements. Therefore, noting that a different clock generator (local clock generator or fub clock generator) is employed on the receiving side, the natural boundary is at the dynamic latch. 
     FIGS. 15 and 16 are other examples featuring the present invention. With regard to FIG. 15 which contains static latch  151 , logic block  152 , p-first dynamic latch  153  and logic block  154  as well as static latch  155 , associated with the succeeding circuit, you have a situation where the dynamic latch, namely, p-first dynamic latch  153 , does not appear to belong to either the generating (or sending) fub or the receiving fub. In fact, it may correspond to a totally separate fub, for example, an intermediately positioned fub, on the die. For example, let us assume that the generating clock is associated with one fub and the receiving clock is over in another fub which can be at an intervening position. In other words, the second stage (inclusive of p-first dynamic latch and logic block  154 ) is dependent, on the one hand, on the clock tied to the first or generator fub while, on the other hand, is also dependent on a second and/or third fub pulse clock. In FIG. 16, however, the invention is featured somewhat differently. Namely, the output logic signals from the generating fub are spread into plural-channel logic circuits (in the present instance, the single logic transmission path is split into two paths on the receiver side). As is clearly shown, this scheme employs two pulse clocks on the receiver side. The question that is then posed is which of these two clocks, namely, pulse clock ck 1 m 1 p 38  and pulse clock ck 2 m 1 p 38 , which may be linked to the same or different domain clocks, is used to open the p-first dynamic latch  163 . According to this methodology, however, either of these receiver phase  1  pulse clocks can be used to open the dynamic latch  163 . That is, the presence of the double gate delay Oring circuit  168  increases, i.e., it widens, the setup time at the input side of the dynamic latch  163 . The amount of delay associated with the Oring circuit  168  is determined by how much logic is associated with one phase versus the other phase. Therefore, if the amount of logic operations to be performed with regard to the phase  1  side is substantially greater than that over on the phase  2  side, it would be advantageous to delay the pulse clock supplied to the gate of the P-channel MOSFET of the p-first dynamic latch  163  by a couple of gate inversions so that the logic signals being transmitted through the phase  1  side have more time to propagate through the p-first dynamic latch before it is closed (set in an OFF-state). Said differently, this delayed Oring also has the effect of increasing the duty cycle associated with the receiver side clock and this, of course, would keep the p-first dynamic latch open for a longer period thereby permitting more time for the logic signals to be propagated therethrough to the phase  2  side. Herein, also, it is noted that all clock signals are phase  1  pulse clock signals. 
     A good application for circuits such as that disclosed herein in microprocessors, for example, would be in connection with decoder circuitry providing select signals for a MUX (multiplexer). For example, let us say, you have a data path and there is a certain multiplexer which controls the flow of data through selection of either signal path A or signal path B. You would therefore have a decoder which sends out control signals for latching the selection of the data path by steering them to the appropriate MUXs (multiplexers). Such latching is effected over multiple pipestages, for example, distributed around the chip to effect control of different portions of the chip. This is known as UOP (micro operation or microop). This is associated with providing control signals which are used to control the data path or, in effect, to control a data path itself. As another example, let us assume you have an ADDER circuit and this ADDER circuit is effected using static logic. Using the advantages of the present invention, you would want to insert some of the p-first dynamic latches (or n-first dynamic latches) to prevent min-delay races. Any traditional static latch circuits such as CMOS static latch circuitry (although not limited thereto) employed in processors (microprocessors) or in any highly integrated chip could use this type of latching mechanism to minimize racing violations. It can also be used in input/output (I/O) circuitry as well as in a multitude of other applications in IC chips, per se, including processor chips, where static latching is effected, thereby also preventing race violations therein. 
     FIG. 17 of the drawings shows another example of the present invention in which an array of static latches are used in a micro operation involving CMOS static latches  171 , static CMOS logic block  172 , n-first dynamic latches  173 , and phase  1  domino logic circuits  174 , which are used in place of the static latches (either alone or in combination with other CMOS to static logic gates). In this example, the static CMOS logic block  172  contains various assortments of combinatorial CMOS logic gates including, for example, CMOS inverters, NAND gates and NOR gates. Examples of CMOS inverters, CMOS NAND and CMOS NOR gates are typified in FIGS. 18A,  18 B and  18 C, respectively. Also, it is noted that at most, the number of inverter gate delays associated with the first phase operation, which is inclusive of the phase  1  CMOS static latches  171  and the static CMOS logic block  172  is limited to six when considering one such inverter gate delay is associated with each of the phase  1  static latches  171 . Examples of static latches are shown in FIGS. 5A and 5B in which a CMOS gate is followed by a CMOS inverter which may include a non-clocked P-channel regeneratively connected MOSFET (keeper) T K . It should also be noted, like the modifications associated with FIG. 1 of the drawings, which are depicted in FIGS. 3 and 4 and described herein, similar as well as other modifications are applicable with respect to the examples given in the embodiments shown in FIGS. 13,  14 ,  15 ,  16  and  17 . 
     For example, instead of logic circuits including combinatorial CMOS logic circuits, although not limited thereto, the application of the dynamic logic methodology employed herein could be in connection with the transmission of data through a number of inverters or repeaters in a column. It should be noted, any time there is a limitation on the number of inversions that can be employed within a clock cycle or a phase of a cycle, you have the potential for creating a race condition there. In that case, the dynamic latch methodology employed in connection with the present invention could be applied to assure race-free conditions. Also, in place of static latch  15  in FIG. 1, static latch  15 ′ in FIG.  3  and static latch  15 ″ in FIG. 4 and, likewise, with regard to the other embodiments, dynamic logic could be substituted therefor such as domino logic and the like, although not limited thereto. 
     This concludes the description of the example embodiments. Although the present invention has been described with reference to a number of illustrative embodiments thereof, it should be understood that numerous other modifications and embodiments can be devised by those skilled in the art that will fall within the spirit and scope of the principles of this invention. More particularly, reasonable variations and modifications are possible in the component parts and/or arrangements of the subject combination arrangement within the scope of the foregoing disclosure, the drawings and the appended claims without departing from the spirit of the invention. In addition to variations and modifications in the component parts and/or arrangements, alternative uses will also be apparent to those skilled in the art.