Patent Publication Number: US-2006006880-A1

Title: Condom testing apparatus

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
      This invention relates generally to the field of machines, equipment or apparatuses used to test condoms for holes, excessively thin walls or other imperfections prior to packaging and distribution. More particularly, the invention relates to such machines, equipment or apparatuses that utilize electrical current to determine the presence of such imperfections.  
      Minute holes, tears, or excessively thin wall areas subject to failure during use are unacceptable and render a condom defective. By virtue of their intended use, it is absolutely essential that condoms provide a complete and impermeable barrier. Minute holes undetectable under visual inspection and excessively thin spots in the condom wall likely to fail in use must be discovered. Because the manufacturing process produces huge numbers of condoms at a high rate and because the material of construction, typically a latex or similar plastic, is purposely very thin and elastic, there is always likely to be a relatively small number of defective products in any production run. Because of this, every condom must be tested prior to packaging and distribution for sale to insure that no defective condoms are supplied to consumers.  
      One method to detect defective condoms is to utilize air or a vacuum, wherein the passage of any air or gas through the condom wall is detected and indicates a defect. A second method utilizes water to test for defects. Typically this involves placing the condom on an electrically conductive mandrel, immersing the condom in water containing an electrical lead and then attempting to pass a current through the water to the mandrel. The condom material acts as an insulating barrier between the water and the mandrel to prevent completion of the electrical circuit, but any hole in the condom will allow the circuit to be completed, indicating that the condom is defective. Advantages of this technique are that low electrical voltages are required and the use of water as a conductive medium provides full contact to all portions of the condom. The major drawback to this technique is that the condoms must be dried prior to packaging. Another drawback is that the technique does not provide an indication of excessively thin spots in the condom wall which may tear in use, since the thin material is still sufficient to prevent passage of current from the water to the mandrel.  
      A third method, and the method utilized in this invention, also takes advantage of the fact that the condom is an electrical insulator. The condom is placed onto a metal, i.e., electrically conductive, mandrel and the outer surface of the condom is then brought into contact with another electrically conductive member, such as a metal mesh, a pad or bristles. In some instances, the condoms are wetted prior to testing, although this is not preferred for the reasons set forth above. The condom prevents completion of a closed circuit to ground, unless there is a defect, in which case the current will arc through the hole, tear or thin-walled area and complete the circuit. This completed circuit indicates a defective condom, which is then discarded. When a conductive mesh material is utilized, the mesh is constructed so as to be very non-rigid so that it closely drapes against the condom on the conductive mandrel. The mandrel and condom are rotated while contacting the electrified mesh, and any defects will allow the current to pass through the condom to the mandrel. A problem with this technique is that because the mesh must have a large amount of open area to achieve the desired flexibility, direct contact against every portion of the condom is not achieved, so a relatively high and thus dangerous amount of electrical current must be used—typically greater than 50 watts—to try to insure that the current will arc from the mandrel through a defect to the nearest piece of mesh. The variation in distance from the condom to particular points on the mesh as the condom is moved past the mesh also makes proper calibration of the electrical current difficult. Another problem is presented by the nipple portion of the condom. Because of this change in configuration from the generally cylindrical main body portion of the condom, providing sufficient contact between the mesh and the nipple material is problematic and defects can be missed. Examples of testing equipment that utilizes this methodology are shown in U.S. Pat. No. 2,221,323 to Gammeter, U.S. Pat. No. 2,609,094 to Fry, and U.S. Pat. No. 2,649,960 to Gammeter.  
      An improved method and apparatus that utilizes completion of an electrical current to indicate defects in a condom, but which does not utilize a mesh material as one of the electrodes, is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 6,160,406 to Underwood et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference. The exterior condom-contacting members comprise in combination an electrically conductive fabric member and an electrically conductive brush member, and may also comprise only fabric members or only brush members. For the combination fabric and brush assembly, the fabric member is positioned to contact the generally cylindrical main body portion of the condom as it is brought across the fabric member. The fabric member is sufficiently long in the mandrel direction of travel such that the condom is tested over its full circumference of 360 degrees, and preferably is provided excessively long such that more than one revolution of the condom is achieved during the test pass. The fabric member is not positioned to contact the far end of the nipple portion, as the friction from the rotational movement would twist and damage the condom. The brush member is positioned along the nipple portion, preferably at an angle to the central axis of the rotating mandrel, in order to contact the extreme end of the nipple portion. In this manner every point of the condom is in direct contact with either the conductive fabric member or the conductive brush member, such that the electrical current will complete the circuit through any minute hole in the condom to indicate a defective condom. Furthermore, because the contact between the condom and both the fabric member and brush member is so extensive, and because the fabric member and brush member are positioned relatively close to the mandrel and at a relatively constant distance, the current strength can be adjusted such that the circuit will be completed even through excessively thin-walled areas of the condom, thus indicating a defective condom even where a hole is not present initially. Alternatively, the fabric member may be omitted and the condom-contacting means formed entirely of one or more conductive brush members appropriately arranged to contact the full extent of the exposed condom on the mandrel. In this construction means such as a geared or friction mechanism are required to rotate the mandrel as it is passed across the brush member, since the coefficient of friction between the brush members and the mandrel would be insufficient to rotate the mandrel unaided.  
      It is common in testing equipment of the various types described above to mount a plurality of mandrels onto a rotating table, track or platform in a circular pattern. With this construction, it is possible to provide a loading station, a testing station and a removal station, each spaced along the travel pathway of the mandrels, such that the table can be rotated continuously in a single direction. The condoms are individually loaded onto empty mandrels, which then travel through the testing zone to identify any defective condoms. The condoms are then removed from the mandrels, with the defective condoms being separated and discarded. Loading of the condoms onto the mandrels may be accomplished manually or by automated equipment. Likewise, removal of the condoms may be accomplished manually or by automatic equipment, although the use of automatic removal and separating equipment in communication with the testing equipment is typical. Loading, removal and separating equipment of various types are well known in the art.  
      In this type of condom defect testing equipment, the minimum distance between adjacent mandrels on the platform, table or track is determined by the circumference of the test mandrels themselves. A typical mandrel may be approximately 5.81 inches in circumference, as it is necessary to provide a uniform stretch on the condom during testing. Since the known condom testing equipment utilizes a single electrically conductive mesh, pad or brush to test each individual condom, with the condom and mandrel being rotated in excess of 360 degrees as it travels across the electrically conductive mesh, pad or brush, the length of the mesh, pad or brush in the mandrel travel direction must be of a distance in excess of the circumference of the loaded mandrel. In practice, this length dimension must also include an additional distance beyond the mandrel circumference as a safety factor to insure that the complete circumference of each condom is tested, so that typically at least 125 percent of the circumference is tested. Since more than one condom cannot be in contact with the mesh, pad or brush during a given test procedure, the mandrels must also be separated a distance greater than the length of the testing mesh, pad or brush. This separation requirement limits the number of mandrels that can be positioned on the rotating table, which in turns limits the testing rate for the condoms. In a typical automatic loading test apparatus, for example, the mandrels are typically separated a distance of approximately 10 inches and the maximum travel rate or rate of rotation is about 12 inches per second.  
      Because the maximum travel rate is limited, especially with regard to manual loading, an apparatus that enables the mandrels to be more closely spaced will increase the number of condoms that can be tested over a given time period. Condom testing equipment with automatic condom loading typically test about 100 condoms per minute, while manually loaded testing equipment typically test about 50 to 60 condoms per minute. While increasing the testing rate of either type is desirable, the manual loading test equipment is much cheaper and occupies significantly less floor space than automatic loading test equipment, and thus it is especially desirable to increase the testing rate on the manual loading apparatuses.  
      It is an object of this invention to provide an improved condom testing apparatus and methodology which address the problems described above in terms of increasing the testing rate of condoms, especially with regard to manual loading condom testing apparatuses, in that the distance between condom-containing mandrels is minimized. It is an object to provide such an apparatus wherein the defects in a condom are detected upon passage of an electrical current between an electrically conductive mandrel and multiple external condom-contacting electrode members through any defect in the condom such that a closed circuit is formed. It is an object to provide such an apparatus wherein the length of any of the condom-contacting electrode members in the direction of travel of the mandrel is less than the circumference of the mandrel, such that at least two sets of condom-contacting electrode members are required to test the entire circumference of the condom, in that neither set of condom-contacting electrode members individually tests the full circumference of the condom. It is an object to provide such an apparatus wherein a second condom-containing mandrel is tested on the first set of condom-contacting electrode members simultaneously with a first condom-containing mandrel being tested on the second set of condom-contacting electrode members, the first condom-contacting mandrel having been already tested on the first set of condom-contacting electrode members and advanced to the second set of condom-contacting electrode members. These objects, as well as objects not expressly set forth, will be apparent upon examination of the disclosure that follows.  
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
      The invention is in general a condom defect testing apparatus that utilizes electrical current to detect holes, tears or excessively thin-walled areas in a condom, wherein the non-defective condom acts as an insulator to prevent current flow between external condom-contacting electrode members and a conductive mandrel electrode member. If the electrical circuit containing any one of the condom-contacting electrode members and the conductive mandrel is closed due to the arcing of current through a defect, this state is detected and the condom is deemed defective and is subsequently discarded. The mandrels are mounted onto a rotating platform, track or table, typically such that the travel path is circular, whereby the condoms are loaded onto the mandrels at a loading station, the loaded mandrels are passed through a testing zone in which the condoms are identified as being defective or non-defective, the condoms are removed from the mandrels in a stripping station, with the defective condoms being separated from the non-defective condoms, and the empty mandrels are returned to the loading station. The rotation of the platform, track or table is preferably a continuous rotation, although an indexed rotation would also be possible.  
      In order to minimize spacing of the test mandrels for the purpose of increasing the testing rate, at least two sets of condom-contacting electrode members are provided, wherein each individual set of condom-contacting electrode members tests less than the full 360 degree circumference of the condom mounted on the mandrel. Each condom is passed through a testing zone containing the at least two sets of condom-contacting electrode members, and the mandrel is rotated as it passes through the testing zone. In an embodiment wherein there are two sets of condom-contacting electrode members, each set tests between 360 and 180 degrees of the condom circumference, and the sets are spaced along the mandrel travel direction such that sufficient rotation of the mandrel occurs during travel from the first set to the second set to insure that the tested portions of the condom circumference overlap. Because the sets of condom-contacting electrode members are spaced, a second condom loaded mandrel is tested on the first set of condom-contacting electrode members simultaneously with a first condom loaded mandrel being tested on the second set of condom-contacting electrode members, thereby allowing the mandrels to be more closely spaced.  
      The sets of condom-contacting electrode members each comprise at least a condom body contacting member and a condom nipple contacting member, wherein preferably the condom body contacting member comprises an electrically conductive fabric or pad member and the condom nipple contacting member comprises an electrically conductive brush member. Most preferably three condom body contacting members are provided, a pair of such condom body contacting members, preferably conductive pads or fabric members, being separated perpendicularly relative to the mandrel axis of rotation, with an additional condom body contacting member, preferably a conductive brush member, being disposed on the opposing side of the mandrel along with the condom nipple contacting member in order to test the area of the condom corresponding to the gap between the two condom opposing condom body contacting members. With this construction, different amounts of current may be passed through the independent condom body contacting members to account for variations in wall thickness in the condom body.  
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       FIG. 1  is a vertical view of an embodiment of the condom testing apparatus, showing a portion of the rotating platform, wherein a tested condom-loaded mandrel has exited the testing zone, a first condom-loaded mandrel is being tested on the second set of condom-contacting electrode members, a second condom-loaded mandrel is being tested on the first set of condom-contacting electrode members, and a pre-testing condom-loaded mandrel is being advanced into the testing zone.  
       FIG. 2  is a side view of the invention showing one set of the condom-contacting electrode members and the mandrel-contacting electrode member.  
       FIG. 3  is a side view of the invention similar to  FIG. 2  but showing an alternative embodiment having one set of the condom-contacting electrode members comprising a pair of conductive pad members and an additional brush member.  
       FIG. 4  is a side view similar to  FIG. 3 , showing a second set of condom-contacting electrodes  FIG. 5  is a schematic diagram illustrating rotation of the condom-loaded mandrel through the testing zone, showing the overlapping regions of contact with the condom-contacting electrode members such that greater than 360 degrees of condom circumference are tested.  
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION  
      With reference to the drawings, the invention will now be described in detail with regard for the best mode and the preferred embodiment. For purposes of this disclosure, the invention will be arbitrarily described such that the central axes of the mandrels are oriented vertically with the nipple end of the mandrel and condom on top, and such that the mandrels are positioned on a platform that rotates or moves horizontally, such that any references to relative direction are based on this construct. Furthermore, in this disclosure the individual mandrels are described as rotating clockwise and the platform as rotating clockwise. It is understood, however, that the orientation and rotation directions of the condom defect testing apparatus may be varied without departing from the scope of the claimed invention.  
      In general, the invention is a condom defect testing apparatus for testing individual condoms  50  for defects, such as holes, tears or thin-walled regions susceptible to failure during use, such that any defective condoms  50  are identified and destroyed prior to packaging and distribution. The testing apparatus is utilized in conjunction with condom loading means for mounting individual condoms  50  onto test mandrels  40  and condom removal and sorting means for removing the condoms  50  from the mandrels  40  and separating the defective condoms from the non-defective condoms. The condom loading means may comprise mechanical apparatuses for automatically mounting the condoms  50  on the mandrels  40 , or the condoms  50  may be loaded onto the mandrels  40  manually. The condom removal and sorting means may also be automatic or manual, but automatic systems in communication with the defect testing apparatus are most common. In a representative removal and sorting system, a roller is used to roll up the condom  50  and a pair of brushes are used to knock the condom  50  off the mandrel  40 , one brush being activated for a defective condom  50  and a different brush being activated for a non-defective condom  50 , such that the defective condoms  50  are expelled into separate conveyors or bins. Thus, the condom defect testing apparatus as contemplated may be incorporated into existing systems or the apparatus may comprise a complete system comprising the condom loading means, the testing means as described in detail herein, and the removal and sorting means.  
      Electrically conductive mandrels  40  are known in the condom testing art, and a typical mandrel  40  comprises a base  41 , a cylindrical extended body  42  and a nipple end  43 , the nipple end  43  comprising a transitional shoulder reducing the diameter of the mandrel  40  down to a smaller tip. The shape of the mandrel  40  is chosen such that a condom  50  comprising a body  51  and a nipple end  52  is uniformly stretched when loaded onto the mandrel  50 . Mandrel mounting means  42  join the mandrels  40  to a moving platform, track or table member  45 , wherein the mandrel mounting means  42  allows each mandrel  40  to rotate about its central axis, and wherein the platform member  45  is typically rotated by a motor such that the travel pathway  99  of the mandrels  40  is circular. Mandrel mounting means  42  may comprise for example a cylindrical pin member mounted below the base  41  that is received by a bore disposed in the rotating platform member  45 . Mandrel rotating means  46  is provided to rotate the individual mandrels  40  about their central axes, and may comprise a curved member that interacts frictionally or mechanically interfaces with the base  41  of the mandrel  40  as it is brought through the testing zone, such that controlled rotation of each mandrel  40  is achieved as it proceeds along the mandrel travel pathway  99 .  
      Mandrel contacting electrode means  47  are provided such that each mandrel  40  is a component in the electrical testing circuitry of the condom defect testing apparatus, the particular electrical conductors and pathways for the testing circuitry being a matter of engineering choice well within the scope of those skilled in the art. A suitable design for the testing circuitry involves connecting the test mandrels  40  to ground via the mandrel contacting electrode means  47 , such that any current passing through a defect in a condom  50  closes the circuit, which state is then detected in known manner. As shown in  FIGS. 2 through 4 , a suitable embodiment for the mandrel contacting electrode means  47  comprises an electrically conductive grounding brush member  33  or  63  mounted by brush mounting means  34  or  64  to a framework  32  or  62  connected to a base  31 , respectively. As the mandrel  40  is brought through the testing zone, the conductive brush member  33  or  63  remains in contact with the mandrel base  41 , the brush member  33  or  63  extending longitudinally in the mandrel travel direction approximately the same distance as the condom body contacting means  11  or  21  and the condom nipple contacting means  12  or  22 , respectively. For a circular pathway  99  as illustrated, it is preferred that the contact surface of the grounding brush member  33  or  63  be curved equivalent to the circular arc of the mandrel travel pathway  99 .  
      The condom defect testing apparatus comprises a first set of condom-contacting electrode members  10  and at least a second set of condom-contacting electrode members  20 , with the condom body contacting means  21  and condom nipple contacting means  22  of the second set  20  being physically separated from the condom body contacting means  11  and condom nipple contacting means  12  of the second set  10 , such that a gap is defined along the travel pathway  99  during which a mandrel  40  and condom  50  are in contact with neither the first set  10  nor the second set  20  in the middle of the testing zone, thereby defining a first testing stage and a second testing stage. The first set of condom-contacting electrode members  10  comprises condom body contacting means  111  and condom nipple contacting means  12  that are components in the electrical testing circuitry whereby a current may independently pass from either the condom body contacting means  11  or the condom nipple contacting means  12  through a defect in the condom  50  and into the mandrel  40  to ground, thereby closing or completing the electrical circuit, which status is then detected by electrical circuit status sensing means as indication that the condom  50  being tested is defective, the status sensing means then operatively determining the sorting of the condom  50  upon removal from the mandrel  40 . The design of the particular electrical conductors, pathways and status sensing means for the testing circuitry are a matter of engineering choice well within the scope of those skilled in the art.  
      The condom body contacting means  11  preferably comprises a single or plural electrically conductive pad member  13 , typically formed of an electrically conductive fabric material backed by a compressible internal member. The conductive pad member  13  is mounted to a framework  32  such that the condom body contacting means  11  remains stationary as the loaded mandrel  40  is passed through the first testing stage. The pad contact surface  15  is curved so as to correspond to the travel pathway  99 , such that the pressure applied to the condom  50  remains generally uniform as it passes. The rotational rate of the mandrel  40  is set to match the travel speed of the mandrel along the pathway  99  such that the frictional contact between the pad contact surface  15  and the condom body  51  does not shift the condom  50  on the mandrel  40  nor stretch the condom body  51 . The height of the conductive pad member  13  must be sufficient to contact the majority of the condom body  51 .  
      In the preferred embodiment, as shown in  FIG. 3 , conductive pad member  13  comprises an upper pad member  17  and a lower pad member  18 , physically separated by a horizontally oriented gap. This allows the current passing through the upper pad member  17  to be set at a different level from the current passing through the lower pad member  18 , which provides better results for condoms  50  wherein the upper portion of the condom body  51  has a different shape or wall thickness than the lower portion of the condom body  51 . When multiple pad members  17  and  18  are present, the condom body contacting means  11  further comprises an electrically conductive body brush member  19  located opposite from the pad members  17  and  18 , with the body brush member  19  being vertically positioned to cover and exceed the gap area between the pad members  17  and  18 . In this manner the full longitudinal length of the condom body  51  is tested by the combination of the condom body contacting pad members  17  and  18  and the body brush member  19 .  
      The nipple end  52  of the condom  40 , which includes the transitional shoulder portion, is tested for defects by condom nipple contacting means  12 , which preferably comprises an electrically conductive brush member  14  mounted on the framework  32  on the opposite side from the body contacting means  11 . The brush contact surface  16  extends from the top of the nipple end  52 , past the transition shoulder and overlaps a portion of the upper end of the condom body  51  so that a portion of the condom body  51  is tested by both the condom nipple contacting means  12  and by the condom body contacting means  11 . Preferably the brush contact surface  16  is curved to correspond to the arc of the mandrel travel pathway  99 .  
      The horizontal or longitudinal dimension of the condom body contacting means  11 , i.e., the contact surface  15  the pad member  13  or the combined pad members  17  and  18 , and the horizontal or longitudinal dimension of the condom nipple contacting means  12 , i.e., the contact surface  16  of the brush member  14 , in the direction along the mandrel travel pathway  99 , is less than the distance around the circumference of the mandrel  40 . In this manner, the condom nipple contacting means  12  and by the condom body contacting means  11  of the first set of condom-contacting electrode members  10  will test less than 100 percent of the surface of the condom  50  as the mandrel  40  passes through the first test stage. For example, for a mandrel having a diameter of approximately 1.85 inches and therefore a circumference of approximately 5.81 inches, the longitudinal dimensions of the contact surface  16  of the condom nipple contacting means  12  and the contact surface  15  of the condom body contacting means  11  cannot exceed 5.81 inches.  
      The condom defect testing apparatus further comprises a second set of condom-contacting electrode members  20  that are physically separated from the first set  10  and which define a second testing stage in the testing zone. The second set  20  comprises condom body contacting means  21  and condom nipple contacting means  22  which perform the functions equivalent to the corresponding means of the first set  10 . Preferably, the components of the second set  20  correspond directly to the components of the first set  10 , such that the second set  20  comprises a conductive pad member  23 , or a pair of upper and lower conductive pad members  27  and  28 , a conductive brush member  24 , pad contact surface  25 , brush contact surface  26 , frame  62 , brush mounting means  64  and pad mounting means  65 , which are structurally and functionally equal or substantially similar to first set  10  components conductive pad member  13 , or a pair of upper and lower conductive pad members  17  and  18 , a conductive brush member  14 , pad contact surface  15 , brush contact surface  16 , frame  32 , brush mounting means  34  and pad mounting means  63 . Such similarities are illustrated by comparing  FIGS. 3 and 4 . As with first set  10 , the horizontal or longitudinal dimension of the condom body contacting means  21 , i.e., the contact surface  25  the pad member  23  or the combined pad members  27  and  28 , and the horizontal or longitudinal dimension of the condom nipple contacting means  22 , i.e., the contact surface  26  of the brush member  24 , in the direction along the mandrel travel pathway  99 , must be less than the distance around the circumference of the mandrel  40 .  
      The first set of condom-contacting electrode members  10  defining the first testing stage of the testing zone are separated from the second set of condom-contacting electrode members  20  defining the second testing stage of the testing zone a distance such that the rotation of the mandrel  40  about its central axis caused by the mandrel rotating means  46  will result in the area of the condom  50  not tested by the first set  10  to be tested by the second set  20 , along with a region of overlap that is tested by both the first set  10  and second set  20 , as shown in  FIG. 5 . For example, it has been found suitable to test approximately 260 degrees of the condom circumference on the first set of condom-contacting electrode members  10 , provide a separation sufficient to allow for approximately 253 degrees of mandrel rotation between the first set  10  and the second set  20 , and then test approximately 260 degrees on the second set of condom-contacting electrode members  20 . Because the two testing stages overlap, more than 100 percent of the condom circumference is tested, with approximately 200 degrees of the condom circumference being tested once and approximately 160 degrees of the condom circumference being tested twice in the overlapping regions. It is of course possible to structure the first and second sets of condom-contacting electrodes  10  and  20  such that the amount of overlap is smaller, or wherein one of the sets  10  or  20  is longer than the other in the horizontal testing direction.  
       FIG. 1  shows a portion of the rotating platform member  45  having condoms  50   a ,  50   b ,  50   c  and  50   d  mounted on mandrels  50  rotatably mounted extended arms. Condom  50   a  has already passed through the testing zone and is ready to be removed and sorted. Condom  50   d  is about to enter the testing zone. Condom  50   b  is passing through the second set of condom-contacting electrode members  20 , having already passed through the first set of condom-contacting electrode members  10 . Under the example given above, approximately 260 degrees of the circumference of the condom  50   b  was tested in the first set  10 , the mandrel  40  was rotated approximately 253 degrees prior to reaching the second set, and an overlapping 260 degrees is being tested in the second set  20 . Condom  50   c  is passing through the first set of condom-contacting electrode members  10  and approximately 260 degrees of circumference is being tested. Because the first set  10  and second set  20  are separated, condom  50   c  can be tested at the same time as condom  50   b , thereby allowing the distance between the mandrels  40  to be reduced, such that more condoms  40  will be tested in a given time period at the same rate of rotation of platform member  45 .  
      As a representative example, a platform member  45  approximately 3.75 feet in diameter having mandrels  40  each with a circumference of approximately 5.81 inches may utilize a first set of condom-contacting electrode members  10  approximately 4.2 inches in longitudinal dimension along the mandrel travel pathway  99  and a second set of condom-contacting electrode members  10  approximately 4.2 inches in longitudinal dimension along the mandrel travel pathway  99 , the first set  10  and second set  20  being separated approximately 4.1 inches along the mandrel travel pathway  99 . With this construction, the mandrels  40  may be spaced approximately every 7.8 inches, which is a significant decrease over known testing apparatuses. On a manual loading machine, this increases the testing rate from about 50 to 60 condoms per minute to about 105 to 110 condoms per minute, while still allowing enough separation for manual loading and maintaining a platform rotational speed of about 12 inches per second.  
      While the invention has been described with reference to a first set  10  and a second set  20  of condom-contacting electrode members defining a first and second stage in the testing zone, it is understood that more than two sets of condom-contacting electrode members may be utilized in succession, with the dimensions in the longitudinal direction along the travel pathway  99  and the separation distance between sets being reduced for each as required to insure that multiple condoms  40  do not contact any given set simultaneously and that sufficient rotation occurs to insure the full circumference of each condom  50  is tested.  
      It is understood that equivalents to certain elements set forth above may be obvious to those skilled in the art, and therefore the full scope and definition of the invention is to be as set forth in the following claims.