Patent Publication Number: US-7906198-B2

Title: Document containing security images

Description:
This application is the U.S. National Phase under 35 U.S.C. §371 of International Application No. PCT/JP2004/014517, filed May 10, 2004, which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. application Ser. No. 60/473,951, filed May 29, 2003, the disclosures of which Applications are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. 
     This application is a continuation in part of PCT Application US2004/001360 which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/443,288 filed Jan. 29, 2003, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/443,289 filed Jan. 29, 2003, and U.S. Provisional Application (unknown) filed January (unknown), and also is a continuation in part of PCT Application US03/32159 filed on Oct. 9, 2003 which claims the benefit of each of the following U.S. provisional applications filed Oct. 10, 2002; 60/417,750; 60/417,751; 60/417,752; 60/417,753; 60/417,754; 60/417,755; 60/417,756; 60/417,757; 60/417,758. This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/473,951 filed May 29, 2003 titled PRISMATIC HOLOGRAPH. Each of the above applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety. 
    
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     This invention relates generally to document protection methods and products, and more particularly to methods and products for printing and obtaining original documents that can be readily differentiated from copies made of those documents. The document protection methods and products also allow detection of an original document by a document reader. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Many methods and products have been developed, for example, to deter counterfeiting of valuable documents including art work, identification documents or financial instruments such as currency, so that unauthorized copies attempted to be made from those documents can be readily distinguished from the originals. Most of these methods and products involve preparing an original document by printing or lithography on high quality media such as silk, rice paper, and high contact rag paper. The printing of original documents may be done either in black-and-white (B&amp;W) or in color, and if in color, either in spot color, colored backgrounds and/or multicolor printing. In the case of color, the tendency has been in the direction of using multiple colors for original documents for aesthetic value, for ease of recognition, and originally for protection from copying by conventional means. The common printing processes of valuable originals, whether in B&amp;W or in color, are intaglio and gravure, among others. These and the other processes mentioned in this application are very well known in the art and will not be discussed in great detail. 
     Most of the useful examples in the prior art to deter counterfeiting and the like are intended to ensure that copies are produced either with a clear moiré pattern or with a “latent image” indicia which is invisible or nearly invisible to the naked eye on the original document. The term “latent image” is used here not in the photographic sense of an unseen image to be developed after processing by chemical reaction, but to indicate indicia that are printed on originals so as to be nearly invisible to the naked eye. 
     These and other developments in the prior art for purposes of providing document protection are disclosed in the patent literature, as for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,018,767 issued May 28, 1991; U.S. Pat. No. 5,193,853 issued Mar. 16, 1993; and U.S. Pat. No. 3,675,948 issued Jul. 11, 1972; and U.S. Pat. No. 4,143,967 issued Mar. 13, 1979, all to Ralph C. Wicker; in U.S. Pat. No. 4,227,720 issued Oct. 14, 1980 and U.S. Pat. No. 4,310,180 issued Jan. 12, 1982 both to William H. Mowry, et al, as well as U.S. Pat. No. 5,149,140 issued Sep. 22, 1992 to Mowry et al; and in U.S. Pat. No. 5,487,567 issued Jan. 30, 1996 to John R. Volpe. All of these patents disclose various means for providing methods and products to enable copies of documents to be distinguished from the originals, as for example, by a “large dot-small dot pattern”, a “close line-spaced pattern”, and images or indicia which are screen printed at minutely varied spaces and/or angles on the originals and are intended to produce a highly visible moiré pattern effect on the unauthorized copies. In this specification, the words “print”, “printed” and “printing” are used to refer to the making of an original document regardless of the techniques used, and the words “copy” and “copying” to refer to making copies from an original. 
     It is well known, however, that copier and computer scanner-printer technology has become even more sophisticated since the development of the prior art in document protection. The goal of copier technology, if not already achieved, has been, especially in desktop publishing and the like, to obtain copies as good as an original. “What you see is what you get” in color documents has become very achievable in copier and duplicator equipment including scanning input devices. Even desk-top computers have become sufficiently sophisticated in color reproduction, including color matching of copies to color standards such as the PANTONE.RTM. Color Matching System. 
     Many if not all of the document protection methods and products were developed before this very significant improvement in copier and computer reproduction technology, and have been found not be as effective in the newer color reproduction technology. This is especially the case on color copiers with a “photo” setting that intentionally copies a document in an “unsharp” focus so as to give the effect of a continuous tone image, the effect of which is to defeat the precise line variation between the copier scanner and the security pattern on the document original. These prior art techniques for document protection may not work as reliably against the many forms of copier/duplicator and computer scanner/output equipment now or soon to be available. 
     Thus it has become imperative for purposes of document security and safety that further improvements in the area of document protection be found, especially where there is a need to prevent copying or duplicating of valuable originals and readily distinguishing the copies from the originals. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     It is an object of the invention to overcome the above problems and provide enhanced security for documents. 
     A document carrying an image may comprise a background portion printed at a first line frequency and at a first color; a first image portion printed at a second line frequency and a second color; and a second image portion printed at the second line frequency and a third color, wherein a combined image the first image portion and the second image portion appear to be substantially the same color as the first color. In the document, the first image portion may include printed lines, dots or spots, and the second image portion may include printed lines dots or spots placed between adjacent printed lines dot or spots of the first image portion. In the document, the first image portion may be printed at a density between 5 percent and 95 percent of the combined image of the first and second image portions. When the document is reproduced by a copying or scanning device, a solid tonal color may be reproduced in the area of the first image portion and the second image portion in substantially the same color at the first color, thereby not reproducing the first image portion and the second image portion. 
     A document carrying an image may comprise: a background portion having printed lines dots or spots at a first angle and at a first color; an image portion having printed lines dots or spots at substantially the same color as the first color and at a different angle than the first angle, wherein when the document is reproduced by a copying or scanning device, a solid tonal color may be reproduced in the area of the image portion in substantially the same color at the first color, thereby not reproducing the first image portion. In the document, at least one of the background portion and the image portion may be printed at a line frequency greater than about 175 lines per inch. 
     A document carrying an image may comprise: a background portion having printed lines dots or spots at a first angle and at a first line frequency; an image portion have printed lines dots or spots at a second angle and at a second line frequency, wherein the first line frequency is at least two times greater than the second line frequency. In the document, the first line frequency may be greater than about 175 lines per inch. In the document, an image formed by the image portion may be substantially hidden, and when the document is reproduced by a copying or scanning device, the image formed by the image portion is not substantially hidden in the reproduced document. 
     A document carrying a latent image may comprise: a first image portion formed at a first color; a first latent image portion printed at a first line frequency at a first angle and a second color; and a second latent image portion printed at the second line frequency lower than the first line frequency at substantially the first angle and a third color, wherein a combined image the first latent image portion and the second latent image portion may form substantially the same color as the first color. In the document the first latent image portion may include printed lines, dots or spots, and the second latent image portion may include printed lines dots or spots placed between adjacent printed lines dot or spots of the first image portion. When the document is reproduced by a copying or scanning device, a composite image of the first latent image portion and the second latent image portion may be formed as a visible image in a copy of the document. In the document, the first image portion may be a holographic image. In the document, the first image portion may be art work, and the first latent image portion and the second latent image portions may be formed after the creation of the art work or at the same time as the art work. In the document, the first image portion may be a photograph, and the first latent image portion and the second latent image portions may be formed after the creation of the photograph or at the same time as the photograph. A copy of the document may contain distortions. 
     An apparatus for authenticating a document as an original document may comprise: a magnification unit capable of magnifying images contained on the document; a scanning unit capable of scanning images magnified by the magnification unit and creating an electronic format of the images contained on the document; a microprocessor which receives the electronic format and determines if the document contains predetermined security images which are not reproduced when the a reproduction of the document is made by a copying or scanning device. In the apparatus, the microprocessor may compare a layout of the document to a layout of the original document, and the microprocessor may determine the document to be an original document if the layout of the document corresponds to the layout of an original document. The apparatus may further comprise a display which displays a message indicative of whether the document has been determined to be an original document. 
     A method of authenticating a document as an original document may comprise the steps of: reviewing the document for the presence of predetermined security images which are not reproduced when a reproduction of the document is made by a copying or scanning device; and determining the document not to be an original if the predetermined security images are not present in the document. The method may further comprise the steps of comparing a layout of the document to a layout of the original document, and determining the document to be an original document if the layout of the document corresponds to the layout of an original document. The method may further comprise the step of displaying a message indicative of whether the document has been determined to be an original document. 
     A computer readable medium may carry instructions to cause a computer to perform a method of authenticating a document as an original document comprising the steps of: reviewing the document for the presence of predetermined security images which are not reproduced when a reproduction of the document is made by a copying or scanning device; and determining the document not to be an original if the predetermined security images are not present in the document. In the computer readable medium, the method may further comprise the steps of comparing a layout of the document to a layout of the original document, and determining the document to be an original document if the layout of the document corresponds to the layout of an original document. In the computer readable medium, the method may further comprise the step of displaying a message indicative of whether the document has been determined to be an original document. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and form a part of the specification, together with the description serve to explain the principles of the invention. In the drawings: 
         FIG. 1  illustrates a document having a latent security image; 
         FIG. 2  illustrates another embodiment of a document having a latent security image which is hidden to the human eye; 
         FIG. 3  illustrates another embodiment of a document with a latent image; 
         FIG. 4  illustrates a document which contains a dedicated security image; 
         FIG. 5  illustrates a document which contains a latent image in the form of a bar code; 
         FIG. 6  illustrates a document which contains an image which contains distortion or moiré inducing patterns; 
         FIGS. 7A and 7B  illustrate an exemplary safety medium which prohibits reproduction of the information contained on the medium; 
         FIG. 8  illustrates a document having a latent security image; 
         FIGS. 9A and 9B  illustrate documents containing a plurality of security images; 
         FIG. 10  illustrates an exemplary reading device for detecting security images in a document; 
         FIG. 11  illustrates an exemplary method of authenticating a document to be an original using the exemplary reading device of  FIG. 10 ; 
         FIG. 12  illustrates an exemplary bar code reader capable of detecting a bar code as a latent image; 
         FIG. 13  illustrates a document which contains an exemplary conductive image; 
         FIG. 14  illustrates a an exemplary verification device for verifying a document with a conductive image. 
         FIG. 15  illustrates an exemplary apparatus for detecting illegal publishing of documents; and 
         FIG. 16  illustrate an exemplary method for detecting illegal publishing of documents. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
       FIG. 1  illustrates a document  1  having a latent security image  2  which is generally hidden to the human eye. In  FIG. 1 , a background area  3  is preferably printed at a high line frequency. An image  2  is printed with a first color  4  at a predetermined density and printed with a second color  5  also at a predetermined density. The result is that image  2  appears as a third color to the human eye. Preferably, background area  3  is printed in the third color or a color similar to the third color, causing image  2  to be obscure to the eye. 
     The image  2  may be formed by printing the first color  4 , such as by printing lines  6  having a first color at predetermined pitch and thickness. Then the second color  5  may be printed such as by printing lines  7  having a second color between lines  5  at a predetermined pitch and thickness, such as by using a negative image of image  2 . Those of skill in the art will appreciate that lines  6  and  7  may be printed in a single print operation as well, such as by using a laser printer or the like. Also, although only two colors are discussed for purposes of illustration, those of skill in the art will appreciate that more than two colors may be used, including six or more colors. 
     Preferably, the density of lines  6  and  7  are controlled by controlling the pitch (distance between lines), thickness of the lines  6  and  7 , or by controlling the density of the medium, such as ink, used to print lines  6  and  7 . The density of lines  6  and  7  may range from 5% to 95% depending on the colors selected for lines  6  and  7 , the density of the medium, the thickness of the lines, and the desired appearance of image  2 . In an exemplary embodiment, a density of 50% for each of lines  6  and  7  may be used, with a red color for line  6  and a green color for line  7 . Also in an exemplary embodiment, lines  6  and  7  may be printed at a different angle than used to print background  3 . 
     Image  2  may be detected using a reading device which magnifies the image to reveal the two colors, or selectively screens one of the two colors. Latent image  2  preferably may also be detected using an appropriately configured magnification device, such as a document verifying device as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,735,547, herein incorporated by reference. When document  1  is copied or scanned by conventional copying or scanning devices, such as a color photocopier, image  2  is substantially not reproduced in the copy. Particularly, the copy of document  1 , even if in the same color tone as the original document  1 , will contain background area  3  across the entire document, and will not contain image  2 . The presence or absence of image  2  may be used to determine if a document is an original or a copy, respectively. 
       FIG. 2  illustrates a document  10  having a latent security image  14  which appears hidden to the human eye. As illustrated in  FIG. 2 , document  10  preferably has a background area  11  which contains lines  12  of a high frequency, such as about 175 lines per inch or more. Lines  12  preferably have a color. Image  14  preferably contains lines at about the same frequency but at a different angle from lines  12 . Lines  12  and or  15  may be lines, dots or spots. 
     In an exemplary implementation of the concepts of  FIG. 2 , lines  12  may be printed in blue at an angle of 30 degrees with a frequency of 280 lines per inch, and lines  14  may be printed at 45 degrees in blue and also with a frequency of 280 lines per inch. 
     Image  14  may be detected using a reading device which magnifies the image to reveal lines  15  or selectively screens lines  12  to reveal lines  15 . When document  10  is copied or scanned by conventional copying or scanning devices, such as a color photocopier, image  14  is substantially not reproduced in the copy. Particularly, the copy of document  10 , even if in the same color tone as the original document  10 , will contain background area  11  across the entire document, and will not contain image  14 . The presence or absence of image  14  may be used to determine if a document is an original or a copy, respectively. 
       FIG. 3  illustrates a document  20  with a latent image  22 . Document  20  contains a background area  21  which is preferably printed at a first frequency, such as 175 lines per inch or greater, and at a predetermined angle. Image  22  is preferably printed at lower frequency than the frequency of background area  21 . Preferably, the frequency of lines  24  in area  21  is greater than two times the screen frequency of lines  23  in image  22 . More preferably, the line frequency in area  21  is at least three times greater than the line frequency of lines  23  in image  22 . The angle of the lines  22  is preferably at a different angle than the angle of lines  24  by at least 5 degrees. The width of lines  24  and  23  may be selected to provide a continuous aesthetically pleasing appearance of the document. Both lines  24  and  23  preferably have the same color. 
     In an exemplary implementation of a security document using the principles illustrated in  FIG. 3 , lines  24  in background area  21  may have a frequency of at least 175 lines per inch and preferably of 300 lines per inch, and a line width of 0.0025 inches at a 45 degree angle, and lines  23  in image  14  may have a frequency between 100-133 lines per inch and preferably a frequency of 95 lines per inch at a 30 degree angle. 
       FIG. 4  illustrates a document  30  which contains a dedicated security image  33  having a plurality of high and low frequency portions. As illustrated in  FIG. 4 , document  30  preferably has a background area  31 . Image  33  preferably contains first segments  34  which contains lines  35  which range from a high frequency to a low frequency and second segments  36  which contain lines  37  which range from a low frequency to a high frequency. Although two segments are shown for each of the first and second segments  34  and  36 , respectively, any number of segments may be used, including one segment for either segment  34  and  36 . The line frequency in each of segments  34  and  36  may change continuously in a linear or non-linear manner or stepwise from one terminal end of each of segments  34  and  36  to the opposite terminal end, respectively. Each of lines  35  and  37  may be printed in black or in any color. 
     If image  33  is reproduced by conventional copying or scanning devices, the reproduced image will preferably show significant distortions, such as moiré patterns. 
       FIG. 5  illustrates a document  40  which contains a latent image  43  in the form of a bar code. As illustrated in  FIG. 5 , document  40  contains a background area  41  which contains lines  42  at a predetermined frequency and predetermined angle. Image  43  preferably contains a plurality of bars  44  which may form a bar code which may contain information readable by a bar code reader. Bars  44  preferably contain lines  45  at a predetermined frequency, which may be the same frequency as lines  42 . Lines  45  may preferably be printed at a different angle than lines  42  as discussed in the construction of  FIG. 3 , or lines  45  and  42  may be printed in similar colors as discussed in the construction of  FIG. 2  and  FIG. 1 . Any suitable technique for providing a latent bar code image that may not be reproduced may be used. In an exemplary construction in accordance with the concepts of  FIG. 5 , lines  42  and  45  may each be printed at the same frequency, which is a frequency between 150 to 400 lines per inch. 
     Image  43  may be detected using a reading device which magnifies the image to reveal lines  45  or selectively screens lines  42  to reveal lines  45 . A bar code reader may then detect the bar code and read information from the bar code. The information provided by the bar code may include document identifying information or other security information. 
     When document  40  is copied or scanned by conventional copying or scanning devices, such as a color photocopier, image  43  is substantially not reproduced in the copy. Particularly, the copy of document  40 , even if in the same color tone as the original document  40 , will contain background area  41  across the entire document, and will not contain image  43 . The presence or absence of image  43  may be used to determine if a document is an original or a copy, respectively. 
       FIG. 6  illustrates a document  50  which contains an image  52  which contains distortion or moiré inducing patterns. As illustrated in  FIG. 6 , document  50  contains a background portion  51 . Image  52  preferably contains a background portion  53  containing lines  57  at a predetermined frequency and multiple portions  54 ,  55  and  56  which have various line frequencies which may be higher than or lower than the predetermined frequency of lines  57 . For example, the line frequencies in portions  54 ,  55  and  56  may be printed in one or more high frequencies, such as greater than about 175 lines per inch while, background portion  53  may be printed at a low frequency, such as about 100-135 lines per inch. Alternatively, the multi-frequency portions may range from a high frequency in an area to a low frequency in an area next to a high frequency area. 
       FIGS. 7A and 7B  illustrate an image printed on a medium that substantially stops reproduction of information contained on the medium. As illustrated in  FIG. 7A , medium  701 , such as paper, contains printed images  702  and  703  that preferably interfere with scanners, facsimile machines and laser copiers. A first set of printed images, represented by printed image  702  may be printed in a dark color such as black in negative form. Then a second set of printed images, represented by printed image  703  preferably is a contact positive of the first printed image  702  and may be printed in reflective ink, such as silver ink. Alternatively, as illustrated in  FIG. 7B , one of the colors may be printed over all of medium  705  as a solid image  706 . Then the second color in a negative form or a positive form image, depending on the form of the first image, respectively, may be printed on top of image  706 . In both  FIGS. 7A and 7B , reproduction of medium  702  and  705 , respectively, will result in a black copy, making the information on medium  702  and  705 , respectively, unreadable. 
       FIG. 8  illustrates a document  60  which bears an image  63  containing a latent image  68 . Image  63  may be formed of one more colors and latent image  68  may be formed on document  63 , each may be formed by being be printed, embossed, dembossed, foil hot stamped, perfing, holographic processes or any other way to transfer an image to a media. Document  60  may be a newly formed document or may be an existing art work or photograph. Accordingly, latent image  68  may be added to existing art work and photographs. 
     Latent image  68  may be formed from two or more images  65  and  66 , each of which may be formed of lines, dots, swirls, spots, real art work or type. The first image  65  is preferably formed at a high line frequency, such as greater than about 175 lines per inch, and at a first angle in one or more colors. The second image  66  is preferably formed at a low line frequency, such as about 50-135 lines per inch, at the same angle as first image  65  and in one or more colors. The second image  66  is preferably formed between the lines, dot, swirls, or spots of the first image  65  and may be printed either in register or out of register. The colors in the first image  65  and the second image  66  are preferably chosen so that latent image  68  has substantially the same color as image  63 . If the document  60  is reproduced, the reproduced copy is preferably very distorted, such as containing moiré patterns, and the composite image of the first image  65  and the second image  66  preferably appears in the reproduced copy. Accordingly, the latent image  68  protects an original document from copying, for example, by using the visible presence or absence of latent image  68 , an original document can be readily discriminated from a copy. 
     As described in connection with  FIGS. 10-11 , the latent image  68  may be detected in an original document by an appropriately configured reading device. Latent image  68  preferably may also be detected using an appropriately configured magnification device, such as a document verifying device as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,735,547. 
     Those of skill in the art will appreciate that any number of the security images described in  FIGS. 1-8  may be presented separately or in combination on a single document.  FIG. 9A  illustrates a document  100  containing a plurality of security images  1 ,  10 ,  20 ,  30 ,  40 , and  52 , which are discussed in connection with  FIGS. 1-7B .  FIG. 9B  illustrates an identification card  200  containing a plurality of security images  1 ,  10 ,  20 ,  30 ,  40 , and  52 , which are discussed in connection with  FIGS. 1-7B . Although not illustrated, document  60  may also be included on document  100  and/or identification card  200 . 
     Art work may be protected by applying a security image to a part of the work to enable an original work to be distinguished from a copy. 
       FIG. 10  illustrate an exemplary construction of a reading device which may be used to detect security images in document  100  or card  200 . As illustrated in  FIG. 10 , document  1001  containing security image  1007  may be magnified by magnifying unit  1002  which provides a magnified image to scanning unit  1003 . Security image  1007  may formed in accordance with one or more of the techniques illustrated in  FIGS. 1-8 . Magnifying unit  1002  may be any conventional magnification device as known to those of skill in the art and may be integrally formed with scanning unit  1003  or may be independent of scanning unit  1003 . Magnification unit  1002  may enable an optical and/or a digitally enhanced magnification as known to those of skill in the art. A preferred magnification device is capable of providing a magnification of less than 100% of the document image up to 1000% of the document image. 
     The scanning unit  1003  may be any conventional type of scanning unit, including scanning units capable of providing a digital image of a photograph or of providing an electronic word processor document from a text scan. Scanning unit  1003  may be of the type suitable for use with photographic and text scanners, photocopiers, facsimiles. Scanning unit  1003  preferably generates a scanned representation of a scan of document  1001  and security image  1007 , such as a digital representation, and provides this information to a microprocessor  1004 . Scanning unit  1003  may contain one or more storage devices (not shown), such as a RAM, floppy disk drive, writeable CD drive, or the like, which may be used to store the scanned representation prior to being sent to the microprocessor. 
     Microprocessor  1004  processes the scanned representation of document  1001  and particularly of security image  1007 . Preferably, microprocessor contains verification software that compares the scanned representation of the document against a representation of the original document previously stored in a memory associated with microprocessor  1004 . Alternatively, microprocessor  1004  may retrieve the representation of the original document from a remote location, such as through a website or a secure communication link. Microprocessor  1005  may provide results of the comparison to a display  1005 . 
     Microprocessor  1004  may also instruct an access device to provide access to a user when a valid document or ID card is detected. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that an access device may include access to a room or building through a security door and access to information contained on a data base through a secure access port or a firewall, or may simply include access to complete a financial transaction. Preferably, access is denied when microprocessor  1004  determines that scanned document  1004  is not an original document. 
       FIG. 11  illustrates an exemplary method of detecting valid original documents using the reading device depicted in  FIG. 10 . As illustrated in  FIG. 11 , the scanned representation of document  1001  and a representation of a corresponding original document are retrieved by the microprocessor in step S 1 . As illustrated in step S 2 , the microprocessor  1004  reviews the scanned representation of document  1001  to determine if predetermined security images are present in the scanned document, the predetermined security images are preferably images which are latent security images which are not expected to be reproduced in a copy of the document, such as images constructed in accordance with the principles of  FIG. 3 . If the predetermined security images are not present in document  1001 , NO in step S 2 , then microprocessor  1004  determines that scanned document  1001  is not an original document, and may instruct display  1005  to display “COPY”, or “INVALID” or the like instructions. 
     If the predetermined security images are present in document  1001 , microprocessor  1004  may indicate that the document is an original document, or as an increased security measure, microprocessor  1004  may analyze the layout of the scanned document  1001 , as illustrated in step S 3 . The analysis of the layout may include analysis of the location of printed images, both visible images and latent images, analysis of the color, including black and white areas, and/or analysis of the frequency, pitch and/or angles of lines of an image. The layout of scanned document  1001  is compared to the expected layout of an original document, as illustrated in step S 4 . If the layout of scanned document  1001  does not match the expected layout of an original, NO in step S 4 , then the microprocessor  1004  determines that scanned document  1001  is not an original document, and may instruct display  1005  to display “COPY” or “INVALID” or the like instructions. If the layout does match the expected layout, YES in step S 4 , microprocessor  1004  determines that scanned document  1001  is an original or valid document and may instruct display  1005  to display “ORIGINAL” or “VALID”, or the like instructions. 
       FIG. 12  illustrates an exemplary device for reading a bar code image formed on a document. As illustrated in  FIG. 12 , document  2001  preferably contains a bar code image  2007  which is hidden to the human eye. Magnifying unit  1002  preferably magnifies bar code image  2007  and provides the magnified image to bar code reader  2003 . Bar code reader  2003  is preferably a conventional bar code reader capable of reading a plurality of substantially parallel lines and detecting at least one of the pitch, frequency and thickness of the plurality of the substantially parallel lines. Bar code reader  2003  provides the detected information to a microprocessor  2004 , which uses the detected information to determine the content of recorded information in the bar code image  2007 . The recorded information may preferably include information of the authenticity and identity of document  2007 , such as the name of a person using an identification card as document  2001 . 
     Microprocessor may authenticate document  2001  carrying bar code  2007  in the same manner as illustrated in  FIG. 11 , in which case bar code  2007 , and the corresponding information recorded by bar code  2007 , would preferably be one of the detected security images in step S 2 . For example, as an increased security measure, bar code  2007  may be used with other security images and with the layout of document  2007  to determine if document  2007  is an original or valid document. In this manner, a counterfeit document or a copied document in which bar code  2007  may have been successfully reproduced would result in the denial of access. 
     The architecture illustrated in each of  FIGS. 10 and 12 , may be entirely contained in a single device or multiple devices, and the functions associated with the architecture in  FIGS. 10 and 12  may be performed by programmable software. Moreover, the operations illustrated in  FIG. 11  may be performed by programmable software on an internal or external memory (not shown) associated with microprocessor  1004  or  2004 , respectively, such as a ROM or a RAM or any other memory. The software that performs the operations illustrated in  FIG. 11  may be embodied in the form of data in a computer readable medium. A computer readable medium within the scope of this disclosure includes any medium, physical or metaphysical, which is capable of carrying information in a form which can be read by an appropriately configured computer or mobile communication device and associated peripheral devices of the computer or station, including, but not limited to: an optical readable/writeable disc, a magnetic disk, a readable/writeable card, a magnetic tape, an electrical transmission signal for wireline or wireless transmission or optical transmission of data using electrical and/or electromagnetic signals. The data associated with the programmable software may be in the form of packetized digital data. 
       FIG. 13  illustrates an exemplary conductive image  1200  on document  100 , also containing a plurality of security images  1 ,  10 ,  20 ,  30 ,  40 , and  52 , which are discussed in connection with  FIGS. 1-8 . Exemplary conductive image  1200  preferably contains at least two contact areas  1201  which are connected by a conductive trace  1202 . In a preferred construction, contact areas  1201  and conductive trace  1202  may be hidden or obscured from view by being elements of an image and/or being imbedded. The conductive image  1200  may be used to verify the validity of the document. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that contact areas  1201  and conductive trace  1202  may be made of any suitable conductive medium, such as metallic pads or strips, conductive ink, or suitable conductive materials. 
       FIG. 14  illustrates an exemplary reading device  1300  which may be used to with conductive image  1200  to verify the document. The reading device may preferably be in the shape of a pen. Exemplary reading device  1300  preferably contains a controller  1301  which provides a voltage across wires  1303  to cause a current to flow through probes  1304  when they are applied to a valid document  100  having a conductive trace  1200 . When probes are placed on contact areas  1201 , one probe on each area, the current provided preferably flows through one of probes  1304 , one of contact areas  1201 , conductive trace  1202  to the other probe through the other contact area and back to controller  1301  through wire  1303 , i.e. completing an electrical circuit. An indicator light  1302  is preferably provided which lights up when the current is passed through the conductive trace  1202  from one probe  1304  to the other, denoting a valid document. Those of skill in the art will appreciate that indicator light  1302  may consist of one or more single color LEDs, or LEDs of multiple colors, which light up when a sufficient amount of current or voltage is received. For example, when an activation switch (not shown) is pressed on reading device  1300 , indicator light  1302  may light up green if the circuit has been completed (a valid document is detected), or may light up red, or not at all, if the circuit has not been completed (the document is not valid). 
     Those of skill in the art will also appreciate that indicator light  1302  may be replaced with an indicator display, such as a conventional voltmeter, which may display various attributes based on the received current, such as the amplitude of the current or voltage or the measured resistance of the conductive trace, and any of these values may be used to determine if a document is valid. 
       FIGS. 15 and 16  illustrate an exemplary embodiment for detecting and inhibiting illegal desk top publishing of documents. As illustrated in  FIG. 15  a document  1401  being scanned by scanning unit  1403  may contain a security image  1407 . Security image may preferably be an image made in accordance with the principles discussed in connection with  FIGS. 1-8  of this application. Microprocessor  1404  preferably contains a list of prohibited images in memory  1412 , such as U.S. currency (e.g. a U.S. $100 bill), and preferably stores a plurality of attributes of the prohibited images, such as at least one of a predetermined hidden or non-hidden security image, the layout of the prohibited image or selected portions of the prohibited image, hidden or non-hidden artwork or bar codes on the prohibited image, the line characteristics such as line density, line style (e.g. lines, dots, spots) line patterns, and line color of a predetermined part or all of the prohibited image. 
     Microprocessor may receive images through the Internet from a web based server  1420  or from any other internal or external source, such as a hard drive, a CD, DVD or floppy disk drives, a memory card/stick or wireline and/or wireless communications, as illustrated in step S 151  in  FIG. 16 . A received image is evaluated to determine if it contains a predetermined security image which designates the image a prohibited image, as illustrated in step S 152 . If the image does not contain a predetermined security image, NO in step S 152 , then the document is evaluated by detecting for the presence of one or more predetermined attributes which are preferably uniquely associated with a prohibited document as discussed above, as illustrated in step S 153 . If the image is not determined to be a prohibited image to reproduce, microprocessor  1404  provides instruction to printer  1414  to print the image. 
     When a prohibited image is detected, YES in steps S 152  and S 154 , microprocessor  1404  preferably inhibits printer  1414  from reproducing the document and stores illegal activity documentation information documenting the attempted illegal activity into a log on memory  1412 . The illegal activity documentation is preferably held in memory  1412  so that law enforcement authorities may open up the database and review the illegal activity. The stored illegal activity documentation information may include an identification of the document attempted to be reproduced, such as an image of the document, identification of the source of the image of the document (e.g. from a web server, scanner, etc.), user identification such as the computer identification and user address, and date and time of attempted illegal activity. The illegal activity documentation may also include the path of the illegal document from emails and the Internet, such as web addresses, and the length of time the user spent on particular websites, the screen name and what servers the document came from. Servers that host the websites would preferably contain a similarly programmed microprocessor, such as having the same program or as having a specially designated guard chip. If the user is logged on the internet, microprocessor  1404  may also initiate a silent communication with law enforcement authorities by using communication software or device  1410  to connect to the authority&#39;s server  1421  without the user&#39;s knowledge or initiation and send the illegal activity documentation information. If the user is not logged onto the Internet, microprocessor  1404  will preferably cause the communication to be sent upon the next or later logon operations. Microprocessor  1404  may also cause a computer in which it resides (not shown) to be shut down, and/or to also shut down an email system if the document was received from another computer when an illegal operation is detected. 
     The invention may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or essential characteristics thereof. The present embodiments are therefore to be considered in all respects as illustrative and not restrictive, the scope of the invention being indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoing description and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalency of the claims are therefore intended to be embraced therein.