Patent Publication Number: US-2005136531-A1

Title: Folded substrate with applied chemistry

Description:
BACKGROUND  
      Often chemicals are applied to substrates to enhance their functionality. A wide variety of chemicals or lotions can be applied to a substrate, which is then folded and packaged for sale. For example, a surfactant can be applied to a nonwoven substrate and then the substrate dried of any moisture. The resulting wipe is suitable for cleaning surfaces, human skin, or hair, and eliminates the need to separately apply cleansers to the wipe prior to using, since the wipe is ready for use after wetting with water.  
      However, the chemical applied to the surface of the substrate may leave a residue on a person&#39;s skin or hands when handling the wipe. For example, removing a wipe from a larger package to take along for future use can leave an undesirable residue on hands. Furthermore, the chemical can leave a residue on other objects such as diaper bags or purses where an individual wipe may be placed after being removed from a larger package for future use. Therefore, a need exists for a substrate having an applied chemical that does not leave a residue during handling or contact with other objects and surfaces.  
      Additionally, the chemical applied to the substrate may interfere with proper dispensing of the substrate. For example, the chemicals applied to the wipe may have a slippery or oily feel that can make grabbing and removing an individual wipe difficult since the chemical can interfere with obtaining a good grip on the substrate. Other chemicals may have a tacky or sticky effect that can cause blocking where the individual wipes become stuck together interfering with proper dispensing. Therefore, a need exists for a substrate having an applied chemical that does not interfere with proper dispensing of the substrate.  
      Additionally, the chemical applied to the substrate may degrade the substrate in an unacceptable manner. For example, many substrates are laminates of two or more layers held together by an appropriate fastening means such as thermal bonding, adhesive/chemical, or other physical bonding, ultrasonic bonding or combinations thereof. The chemical applied to the wipe may degrade the adhesive weakening the bond strength or causing the substrate&#39;s layers to delaminate. Additionally, the applied chemical may change the surface texture of the substrate. For example, the chemical when coated onto the substrate may reduce or eliminate a desirable texture of the substrate. Therefore, a need exists for a substrate having an applied chemical that minimizes degradation of the substrate.  
     SUMMARY  
      The inventors have discovered that if the chemical is applied to the substrate in discrete areas and then the substrate is folded in such a manner as to cause the discrete chemical areas to become interior surfaces after folding, chemical residues from the substrate can be minimized or eliminated. Furthermore, the inventors have discovered that by applying the chemical to discrete areas of the substrate, degradation of the substrate can be minimized or reduced. Additionally, the inventors have discovered that by including either a chemical free edge strip or a chemical free fold strip, or both, further improvements in dispensing, preventing delamination, or residue reduction are possible.  
      Hence, in one aspect, the invention resides in a product comprising: a substrate having a first and a second opposing sides; a discrete chemical area applied onto, adjacent to, or impregnated into either the first or the second opposing side; a chemical free edge strip on either the first or the second opposing sides; and wherein the substrate is folded such that after folding the discrete chemical area becomes an interior surface.  
      In another aspect, the invention resides in a product comprising: a substrate having a first and a second opposing sides; a discrete chemical area applied onto, adjacent to, or impregnated into either the first or the second opposing side; a chemical free fold strip; and wherein the substrate is folded along the chemical free fold strip forming a folded edge.  
      In yet another aspect, the invention resides in a product comprising: a plurality of individual folded substrates having a first side, a second side, and at least one interior surface created by folding; a discrete chemical area applied onto, adjacent to, or impregnated into the interior surface; and wherein the exterior surfaces of the folded substrate are free of the applied chemical. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
      The above aspects and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings in which:  
       FIG. 1  illustrates one embodiment of the invention.  
       FIG. 2  illustrates the substrate of  FIG. 1  partially folded.  
       FIG. 3  illustrates the embodiment of  FIG. 1  completely folded.  
       FIG. 4  illustrates another embodiment of the invention.  
       FIG. 5  illustrates the substrate of  FIG. 4  partially folded.  
       FIG. 6  illustrates a package containing a plurality of folded substrates.  
       FIG. 7  illustrates another embodiment of the invention partially folded.  
       FIG. 8  illustrates another embodiment of the invention partially folded.  
       FIG. 9  illustrates another embodiment of the invention. 
    
    
      Repeated use of reference characters in the specification and drawings is intended to represent the same or analogous features or elements of the invention.  
     Definitions  
      As used herein forms of the words “comprise”, “have”, and “include” are legally equivalent and open-ended. Therefore, additional non-recited elements, functions, steps or limitations may be present in addition to the recited elements, functions, steps, or limitations.  
      As used herein “substrate” is a flexible sheet or web material, which is useful for household chores, personal care, health care, food wrapping, and cosmetic application or removal. Non-limiting examples of suitable substrates of the present invention include nonwoven substrates, woven substrates, hydro-entangled substrates, air-entangled substrates, paper substrates such as tissue, toilet paper, or paper towels, waxed paper substrates, coform substrates, wet wipes, film or plastic substrates such as those used to wrap food, and metal substrates such as aluminum foil. Furthermore, laminated or plied together multi-layer substrates of two or more layers of any of the preceding substrates are suitable.  
      Further examples of suitable substrates include a substantially dry substrate (less than 10% by weight of water) containing lathering surfactants and conditioning agents either impregnated into or applied to the substrate such that wetting of the substrate with water prior to use yields a cleansing product. Such substrates are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,980,931 entitled  Cleansing Products Having A Substantially Dry Substrate  issued to Fowler et al. on Nov. 9, 1999, and herein incorporated by reference in a manner consistent with the present disclosure.  
      Other suitable substrates may have encapsulated ingredients such that the capsules rupture during dispensing or use. Examples of encapsulated materials include those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,215,757 entitled  Encapsulated Materials  issued to E1-Nokaly on Jun. 1, 1993, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,599,555 entitled  Encapsulated Cometic Compositions  issued to E1-Nokaly on Feb. 4, 1997, and herein incorporated by reference in a manner consistent with the present disclosure.  
      Other suitable substrates include dry substrates that deliver liquid when subjected to in-use shear and compressive forces. Such substrates are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,121,165 entitled  Wet - Like Cleaning Articles  issued to Mackey et al. on Sep. 19, 2000, and herein incorporated by reference in a manner consistent with the present disclosure.  
      As used herein “substantially dry” means that the substrate contains less than about 25 percent water as tested under ASTM D1 744-92 entitled “Standard Test Method for Determination of Water in Liquid Petroleum Products by Karl Fischer Reagent” modified as follows: A 500 milligram±100 milligram sample is cut from the substrate and weighed on an analytical balance to the nearest 0.1 milligram. Adjust the size of the sample as needed to obtain the specified sample weight. Introduce the sample to the titration vessel and stir approximately 5 minutes to extract the water from the sample. After stirring the sample, titrate as described in the above test procedure and calculate the percent water as described in the above test procedure. In other embodiments of the invention, the substantially dry substrate can contain less than about 20 percent water, less than about 15 percent water, or less than about 10 percent water as tested above.  
      If the substrate is coated with a chemical or has variations in moisture content depending upon the sample location, a sufficient number of samples from all areas of the substrate should be tested and averaged together to establish within±1 percent the average moisture content for the entire substrate. For example, if the chemical coating comprises 30 percent of the surface area of the substrate, numerous samples should be taken from the substrate in both the coated and non-coated areas and tested. To establish the average moisture content of the entire substrate,  30  percent of the samples used in the final average should be from the coated area and the remaining 70 percent of the samples used in the final average should be from the uncoated area.  
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
      It is to be understood by one of ordinary skill in the art that the present discussion is a description of exemplary embodiments only, and is not intended as limiting the broader aspects of the present invention, which broader aspects are embodied in the exemplary construction.  
      Referring now to  FIG. 1 , one embodiment of a substrate  20  having a first  22  and a second  24  opposing surface with a chemical  26  either applied onto, adjacent to, or impregnated into the substrate is illustrated. The chemical is applied non-uniformly to the substrate such that it resides only in discrete areas with other discrete areas of the substrate free of the chemical. The chemical may be applied in a zoned application to the substrate that includes without limitation, strips; stripes; geometric figures such as squares, rectangles, circles, or dots; lines; wavy lines; or patches. In the illustrated embodiment, the chemical is applied in a first chemical strip  28  located on the first surface  22  and in a second chemical strip  30  located on the second surface  24  as illustrated by the dashed lines. One means of achieving a non-uniform chemical application is to slot coat the chemical onto the first and second sides of the substrate.  
      In one embodiment, the chemical is applied in such a manner as to leave a chemical free edge strip  31  present on the first and second surfaces. It is not necessary for the chemical free edge strip to run the entire length of the edge. For example, the chemical free edge strip could be intermittent along the edge with portions of the substrate adjacent the edge having the applied chemical and other portions free of the applied chemical.  
      One function or advantage of the chemical free edge strip is to provide a finger tab for grasping the substrate in order to open or remove the substrate from its packaging. By leaving at least a portion of the edge chemical free, it can be easier to grasp or open the substrate, especially when the applied chemical causes the substrate to become slippery, wet, or oily to the touch. Additionally, if the applied chemical is prone to blocking or sticking to the other surface when folded, the chemical free edge strip provides a free surface to grab that is not stuck, adhered, or held down. Another function or advantage of the chemical free edge strip is to prevent or minimize delamination, also known as ply separation, of a multi-layer substrate. As mentioned, the applied chemical can sometimes interfere with the bonding between layers of a multi-layer substrate. By leaving at least a portion of the edges of the substrate chemical free, the individual layers are less likely to delaminate. Ensuring a strong bond between the layers of the multi-layer substrate at the edges lessens or eliminates complete delamination of the layers even when other portions of the substrate become delaminated.  
      In various embodiments of the invention, the width of the chemical free edge strip  31  can be about 1 mm wide or greater, about 5 mm wide or greater, about 10 mm wide or greater, between about 1 mm to about 50 mm wide, between about 5 mm to about 25 mm wide, or between about 10 mm to about 20 mm wide  
      In various embodiments of the invention, the width of the chemical strip can be about 1 mm wide or greater, about 5 mm wide or greater, about 10 mm wide or greater, about 20 mm wide or greater, between about 1 mm to about 150 mm wide, between about 5 mm to about 100 mm wide, or between about 10 mm to about 50 mm wide.  
      Illustrated in  FIG. 1  is a plurality of fold axes  32  that mark where the substrate is folded upon itself after applying the chemical strips. Referring now to  FIGS. 2 and 3 , the substrate of  FIG. 1  is illustrated in a sequence of folding steps. As seen in  FIG. 2 , the substrate is first folded into a Z fold such that the first and second chemical strips become interior surfaces  34  after folding the substrate. As such, the chemical is no longer exposed on either the first or second surfaces of the substrate after folding. By folding the substrate such that the chemical is hidden from the exterior surfaces of the folded substrate, the possibility of the chemical leaving a residue on surfaces, or hands is minimized or eliminated when handling or storing the substrate. Thus, an individual wipe can be removed from a package and placed directly into a purse or diaper bag without worrying about the chemical leaving a residue or having to place the wipe into a plastic bag for storage.  
      Although not needed to hide the applied chemical, the substrate is then folded in half after Z folding as illustrated in  FIG. 3 . The resulting folded substrate is approximately one-quarter the size of the original substrate before folding. The quarter fold, Z-folded substrate illustrated in  FIG. 3  is a convenient size for packaging and transport. Furthermore, the folded substrate is easily opened by simply grasping the chemical free edge strip  31  on an exterior folded panel  36  and shaking or allowing the weight of the substrate to open the other folds.  
      Referring now to  FIGS. 4 and 5 , an alternative embodiment of the invention is illustrated. Instead of two chemical strips, the substrate  20  has four chemical strips (two on the first side and two on the second side) where the chemical is applied. Similar to the embodiment of  FIG. 1 , the substrate has an edge strip  31  on each side that is left chemical free. Additionally, the substrate has at least one chemical free fold strip  38  that is left chemical free. The fold strip coincides with one or more of the substrate&#39;s fold axes  32 . After folding as illustrated in  FIG. 5 , the chemical free fold strip becomes a folded edge  40 . As illustrated, the substrate can be folded along the chemical free fold strip such that the applied chemical becomes an interior surface after folding. The chemical free fold strip can help reduce chemical residue on surfaces that come into contact with the folded edge.  
      Referring now to  FIG. 6 , a package  42  having a cover  44  and a body  46  is illustrated. In one embodiment, the package comprised a carton made from a paperboard or cardboard material. The package contains a plurality of folded substrates  20  having an applied chemical. The cover  44  includes a top  48  and a cover sidewall  50 . The cover sidewall  50  in one embodiment includes four generally rectangular panels that intersect at approximately 90 degree angles. The body  46  includes a bottom  52 , a body sidewall  54 , and a clear window  56 . The body sidewall  54  in one embodiment includes four generally rectangular panels that intersect at approximately 90 degree angles. The clear window  56  can be located anywhere in the package. In one embodiment, the clear window  56  spanned a corner of the body sidewall  54  such that a portion of the clear window was present on each of two intersecting panels of the body sidewall.  
      For an embodiment where the applied chemical after folding is not on the interior surfaces but instead resides on the exterior surfaces (not illustrated), it is still possible to have the edges of the substrate chemical free by use of the chemical free fold strip. Such an embodiment would help minimize any residue from the folded edges on the inside of a package containing a stack of several individual folded substrates. For example, if the package has a clear window for seeing into the interior of the package, the chemical free fold strip can prevent or minimize chemical residue being transferred onto the window that could reduce visibility through the window. Alternatively, the substrate can be folded with the applied chemical placed on an interior surface and placed into the package. If the applied chemical is prone to wicking through the substrate, the chemical free fold strip can prevent or minimize chemical residue on the window.  
      One of the functions or advantages of the chemical free fold strip is to further minimize or reduce the chances of the chemical leaving any residue on surfaces. For example, after folding, the individual substrates may be assembled into a stack, and the stack may be placed into a package such as a cardboard carton. During the folding process, the compressive forces exerted on the substrate can squeeze or transfer the chemical  26  from the interior surface  34  through the substrate to either the folded edge  40  or another portion of the exterior surface. When the folded substrate is placed into the carton, the folded edge can come into contact with the carton&#39;s interior surfaces. If the applied chemical is prone to wicking or migration, the chemical can leach from the folded edge of the substrate into the cardboard and become visible on the carton&#39;s interior surface, exterior surface, or clear window reducing the attractiveness of the packaging. A consumer may be hesitant to buy and/or use the packaged product with a stained interior, exterior, or window thinking the product is somehow damaged. By utilizing one or more chemical free fold strips  38  the problem is eliminated or reduced.  
      Another advantage of the chemical free fold strip is to minimize or reduce degradation of the substrate. For example, a plurality of chemical free fold strips can help prevent delamination of a multi-layer substrate by providing additional areas that are free of the applied chemical, which could interfere with bonding between the layers. Additionally, leaving areas of the substrate free of the applied chemical can allow for a different texture or physical surface feel between the chemical free areas and the areas where the chemical has been applied. Depending on the nature of the applied chemical, it can be desirable to leave uncoated areas of the substrate adjacent or near coated areas of the substrate.  
      In various embodiments of the invention, the width of the chemical free fold strip can be about 1 mm wide or greater, about 5 mm wide or greater, about 10 mm wide or greater, between about 1 mm to about 50 mm wide, between about 5 mm to about 25 mm wide, or between about 10 mm to about 20 mm wide.  
      Referring now to  FIG. 7 , an additional embodiment of the invention is illustrated. Rather than a Z-folded substrate, the substrate can be C-folded as illustrated to position the applied chemical to the interior surfaces  34 . Thereafter, the substrate may be optionally folded in half to become approximately one-quarter the size of the original substrate.  
      Referring now to  FIG. 8 , an additional embodiment of the invention is illustrated. Rather than a Z-folded substrate, the substrate can be V-folded, as illustrated, to position the applied chemical to the interior surfaces  34 . Thereafter, the substrate may be optionally folded in half to become approximately one-quarter the size of the original substrate.  
      While the invention has been illustrated with C-, V-, and Z-folding and then optionally quarter-folding by folding the substrate in half, any manner of folding the substrate to hide the applied chemical from the exterior surfaces of the substrate after folding is possible. For example, after C-, V-, or Z-folding, the substrate could be folded three, four, or more times instead of just once in half as illustrated. Variations of C-, V-, or Z-folds are possible such that the folded portions of the substrate are not symmetrical after folding. For example, J- or S-folds are possible by changing the location of the fold axis.  
      Referring now to  FIG. 9 , another embodiment of the invention is illustrated. In this embodiment, the applied chemical residing on the second side  24  and the fold axes  32  are not illustrated for clarity. In the illustrated embodiment, the chemical  26  is sprayed, coated, or printed in a discrete pattern onto both sides of the substrate  20  by using a mask, a grating, a printing roll, or other means to form four generally rectangular areas on each side of the substrate having the applied chemical. Instead of rectangles, other geometric shapes can be used or simply irregularly shaped patches.  
      The applied chemical does not extend to the edges of the substrate, such that the chemical free edge strip  31  runs around the entire perimeter of both sides of the substrate. The quadrant placement of the discrete chemical areas also ensures that for each of the three fold axes, there is a chemical free fold strip  38  present. Thus, after folding, all of the substrate&#39;s folded edges are unlikely to have any of the applied chemical present, reducing any chance of the chemical leaving a residue from contact with the folded edge. After applying the chemical to both the first and the second sides, the substrate can be folded as illustrated in  FIGS. 2 and 3 .  
      The chemical applied to the substrate can be any useful chemical or mixture of various chemicals that enhances the functionality of the substrate for its intended purpose. Possible chemical additives include, without limitation, strength additives, absorbency additives, softener additives, surfactant additives, conditioning additives, aesthetic additives such as fragrances or dyes. Other additives include, without limitation, anti-acne additives, antimicrobial additives, antifungal additives, antiseptic additives, antioxidants, cosmetic astringents, drug astringents, deodorants, detergents, emollients, external analgesics, binders, film formers, skin moisturizing ingredients as known in the art, opacifiers, skin conditioning agents, skin exfoliating agents, skin protectants, sunscreens, vapor rubs and the like. Suitable chemicals are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,400,403 issued to Troken et al. on Nov. 24, 1998, entitled  Multi - Elevational Tissue Paper Containing Selectively Disposed Papermaking Additive,  and herein incorporated by reference in a consistent manner. Additional suitable chemicals are disclosed in the previous incorporated references.  
      In one embodiment, the chemical applied to the substrate was a surfactant formulation comprising a concentrated (60 percent active ingredients) detergent system of a nonionic alkylpolyglucoside and zwitterionic amido betaine. High levels of a polyol, such as glycerin, allow the surfactant formulation to remain at a low viscosity for improved slot-coating capability during manufacturing. The lathering surfactants utilized in the surfactant formulation are Decyl Glucoside and Cocamidopropyl Betaine. Decyl Glucoside, from about 5 percent to about 40 percent of the total active ingredients of the surfactant formulation, is a mild, nonionic alkylpolyglucoside used for detergency and foam volume properties. Cocamidopropyl Betaine, from about 0.5 percent to about 25 percent of the total active ingredients of the surfactant formulation, is a high-foaming amphoteric detergent to deliver “quick” flash foam with minimal agitation upon dilution. Glycerin (a polyol), from about 0.5 percent to about 40 percent of the total active ingredients of the surfactant formulation, and PEG-7 Glyceryl Cocoate (a glyceryl ester), from about 0.5 percent to about 25 percent of the total active ingredients of the surfactant formulation, are both water-soluble conditioning agents or humectants/emollients designed to deliver moisture to the skin. Glycerin has a secondary function in the surfactant formulation as a diluent to lower the surfactant formulation&#39;s viscosity for improved slot-coating capability when applying the surfactant formulation to the substrate manufacturing. DMDM Hydantoin as a bactericide, about 0.4 percent of the total active ingredients of the surfactant formulation, and Iodopropynyl Butylcarbamate as a fungicide, about 0.03 percent of the total active ingredients of the surfactant formulation, act together as a preservative system for the surfactant formulation. A fragrance (Shaw Mudge 62526M) containing lavender and chamomile extracts, from about 0.1 percent to about 1 percent of the total active ingredients of the surfactant formulation, provides a lavender and chamomile baby scent. The remaining component was approximately 40 percent water, which serves as a diluent or solvent to keep the surfactant formulation in a pourable/pumpable, fluid state. Other formulations can comprise from about 30 percent to about 90 percent active ingredients with the balance water.  
      The chemical may be applied onto, adjacent to, or impregnated into the substrate by any means known in the art. The chemical may also be placed between or adjacent to any of the layers within a multi-layer substrate, or applied to or impregnated into any of the layers. The chemical may be applied to the substrate, the substrate folded, and then the substrate allowed to dry after being packaged. Since the chemical can be placed onto an interior surface after folding, it is not necessary to dry the substrate prior to either folding or packaging, saving a processing step. Alternatively, the substrate can be dried after the chemical is applied, folded, and then packaged.  
      Suitable chemical application methods include, but are not limited to, flexographic printing, rotogravure printing, offset printing, letterpress, direct gravure coating, offset gravure coating, reverse roll coating, flexographic coating, slot coating, dip coating, rod coating, knife coating, air knife coating, blade coating, slide coating, curtain coating, spraying, hot melt spraying, foam application, and extrusion. Further information on coating methods is disclosed in  Modern Coating and Drying,  Edward Cohen and Edgar Gutoff, 1992 VCH Publishers, Inc.  
      The chemical may be added or applied to the substrate in any effective amount. The addition rate will depend to some degree on the chemical being applied and the type of substrate that the chemical is applied to. In various embodiments of the invention, the chemical addition rate can be between about 1 percent to about 400 percent based on the substrate&#39;s weight or between about 10 percent to about 200 percent based on the substrate&#39;s weight.  
     EXAMPLE 1  
      A 115 gsm (grams per square meter) multi-layer substrate comprising three layers with an applied chemical was manufactured. Each of the substrate&#39;s two outer surface layers comprised a 34.5 gsm coform material having 60 percent pulp fiber identified as CF405 fiberized southern softwood pulp available from Weyerhauser and 40 percent polymeric fibers identified as PF-015 polypropylene meltblown available from Basell. The substrate&#39;s inner layer comprised a 23 gsm elastomeric material comprised of a mixture of polyethylene materials that are sold by Dow Chemical. Seventy percent (70%) of the inner layer comprised Dow Affinity XUS59400.03L, a metallocene-catalyzed polyethylene. Thirty percent (30%) of the inner layer comprised a mixture of 80 percent Dow Affinity XUS59400.03L, 15 percent Regalrez 1126 Tackifier, and 5 percent Dow DNDN 1077, a linear low density polyethylene.  
      The substrate&#39;s outer surface layers and inner layer were laminated together. The inner layer is stretched by approximately 2.2 times its original length and then laminated to the outer layers using an embossing pattern. The multi-layer substrate is then allowed to retract approximately 30 percent to achieve a final basis weight of approximately 115 gsm. U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/751,329 entitled  Composite Material With Cloth-Like Feel  filed on Dec. 29, 2000, and herein incorporated by reference, provides more details on the process used to make the multi-layer substrate. Another multi-layer substrate is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,720,415 entitled  Composite Elastomeric Material and Processing for Making the Same  issued to Vander Wielen et al. on Jan. 19, 1988, and herein incorporated by reference.  
      After the substrate was made, the substrate was slot coated with four chemical strips (two on each side of the substrate) as shown in  FIG. 4 . The substrate measured approximately 216 mm in width by 216 mm in length. The chemical free edge strips on the first and second opposing surfaces were approximately 12 mm wide. The four chemical strip widths measured approximately 36 mm wide. The chemical free fold strips between the chemical strips measured approximately 12 mm wide. The chemical free strip between the inner two chemical strips on opposite sides of the substrate was approximately 24 mm wide.  
      The above recited surfactant formulation was applied at a rate of about 4 grams per sheet. After slot coating, the substrate was folded as illustrated in  FIG. 5  and then quarter-folded as illustrated in  FIG. 3 . The folded substrate was stacked with other identically prepared folded substrates. A stack of approximately fourteen (14) individually folded substrates was then packaged into a paperboard carton as illustrated in  FIG. 6 . The folded substrates were allowed to dry due to evaporation occurring during manufacturing and from the carton after packaging. Due to either evaporation or by applying a reduced moisture content formulation, the coated substrate can be a substantially dry substrate for certain applications. If desired, the interior of the carton can be coated with a coating to make the carton more impervious to liquids during the drying phase or to provide increased resistance to the chemicals contained in the formulation.  
      The substrate produced by the above process is useful for a disposable washcloth. By placing the washcloth in water, the surfactant formulation is activated. The chemical free edge strip enabled ready dispensing by providing a chemical free edge to grab when removing the wipe. The folding method ensured that the applied chemical became interior surfaces, thereby reducing any chemical residue on hands or surfaces in contact with the wipe prior to activating the applied chemical. The chemical free fold strip further reduced any chemical residue on surfaces such as the interior surfaces, the exterior surfaces, or the clear window of the paperboard carton used as a package. By folding the substrate with the applied chemical towards the interior surfaces, the chances of the individual folded substrates sticking together within the packaging were also minimized.  
      After slot coating with the applied surfactant formulation, the multi-layer substrate was tested for its delamination force as tested by the Small Angle Peel Test. In areas of the substrate having the applied chemical, the delamination force as tested below was determined to be approximately 2.5 g/cm. In areas of the substrate free of the applied surfactant formulation, the delamination force was determined to be approximately 45.4 g/cm. Even though the delamination force was found to be relatively low due to the applied surfactant formulation, the multi-layer substrate did not delaminate in use. The inventive chemical application pattern and utilization of the chemical free edge strips and fold strips helped to ensure that the multi-layer substrate remained intact during use.  
     Test Methods  
      Small Angle Peel Test  
      All testing is done in a standard laboratory atmosphere of 23±1° C. and 50±2% relative humidity. All test specimens must be conditioned for at least 4 hours prior to testing.  
      The Small Angle Peel Test measures the amount of force required to delaminate one layer from another layer in a multi-layer substrate. The test is conducted by delaminating a portion of the substrate by hand, inserting a peel arm test fixture between the delaminated layers, and then measuring the peak force needed to further delaminate the substrate using a tensile tester. To determine the small angle peel force, a tensile tester is utilized such as a Sintech tensile tester manufactured by Sintech Inc., Research Triangle Park, N.C. 27709.  
      The peel arm test fixture is a C-shaped test fixture having an upper delaminating arm and a lower base leg that is constructed from 0.25″ (6.35 mm) thick stainless steel. The base leg of the test fixture is 0.75″ high (19.0 mm) by 3.5″ long (88.9 mm). A small plate can be T welded to the top of the base leg to ensure that the test fixture is aligned parallel to the lower jaws of the tensile tester by resting the plate against the top of the jaws and then clamping the jaws together. The upper delaminating arm is 0.38″ high (9.65 mm) by 4.25″ long (108 mm). The upper delaminating arm is beveled for a length of 3.25″ (82.6 mm) from its free end to a symmetric V shape with the point of the V facing the base leg. The overall height of the test fixture is 4.84″ (122.9 mm) and the width of the vertical support bracket supporting the upper delaminating arm above and parallel to the base leg is 0.75″ (19.05 mm).  
      Insert the peel arm test fixture into the lower jaws of the tensile tester ensuring that the upper delaminating arm is parallel to the upper jaw. The gage length between the upper arm and the upper jaws of the tensile tester is set to 1.0 inches (25.4 mm).  
      The test specimen is cut to 1.0 cm (0.4″) in width along the machine direction. After cutting the test specimen, delaminate the test specimen by hand for about 1.5″ (38.1 mm). If necessary to ensure that a test strip having the applied chemical and a chemical free test strip can be tested, a narrower test strip can be utilized. Ensure that the layer having the applied chemical is delaminated from the rest of the multi-layer substrate. In the event that multiple chemicals are applied to multiple layers, the force required to separate each layer from an adjacent layer is separately tested.  
      Place the test specimen into the tensile tester by clamping the delaminated portion in the upper jaws after inserting the upper delaminating arm of the test fixture between the separated layers. Calibrate the tensile tester and load cell according to the manufacturer&#39;s directions. The maximum capacity of the load cell should be chosen such that the majority of the measured peak tensile values fall between 10% and 90% of the load cell&#39;s capacity. Ensure that the crosshead speed of the tensile tester is set to 0.25 inch per minute (6.35 mm/min), the break sensitivity is set to 95%, and the extension limit high is set to 3.5 inches (88.9 mm).  
      During the test, the upper jaws of the tensile tester pull the test specimen upwards causing further delamination of the test specimen as it is split in two by the upper delaminating arm of the test fixture. The upper jaw moves a total of 3.5 inches (88.9 mm) while the force data from the load cell is measured. The maximum load for each specimen at the test speed during the 3.5 inches of delamination is determined using a data acquisition program having a sufficient sampling rate to accurately record the maximum load. At least five (5) or more samples are tested to obtain a reliable average for the maximum load. The delamination force is calculated by dividing the average maximum load in grams by the test specimen width in centimeters to obtain the average delamination force expressed in g/cm.  
      Other modifications and variations to the present invention may be practiced by those of ordinary skill in the art, without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention, which is more particularly set forth in the appended claims. It is understood that aspects of the various embodiments may be interchanged in whole or part. All cited references, patents, or patent applications in the above application for letters patent are herein incorporated by reference in a consistent manner. In the event of inconsistencies or contradictions between the incorporated references and this application, the information present in this application shall prevail. The preceding description, given by way of example in order to enable one of ordinary skill in the art to practice the claimed invention, is not to be construed as limiting the scope of the invention, which is defined by the claims and all equivalents thereto.