Patent Publication Number: US-5527564-A

Title: Method and apparatus for repelling overspray in spray paint booths

Description:
This invention relates to panels used in booths and, more particularly, to panels used within or about booths having electrically charged, airborne coating particles entrained in air. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     An electrostatic paint system consists of a paint booth or enclosure in which a coating such as paint is applied to parts, a conveyor for carrying parts into and out of the booth and an electrostatic paint applying system. The paint applying system includes an atomizing device which receives a fluid column of paint and atomizes it into finely divided paint particles, places an electrical charge on the particles, creates an electrical field between the device and ground, imparts a velocity to the paint particles which directs them toward the grounded part to be coated and meters the paint. Electrically charged paint particles are attracted to and have an affinity for the grounded object to be painted since the grounded object assumes a polarity opposite that of the atomizing device. The charged particle, acted upon by the electrical field, can be deflected from its original trajectory in the direction of the grounded object. 
     In an automatic electrostatic system, the atomizing device may be mounted in a fixed position, attached to a gun mover device that provides reciprocating motion, attached to a robot that imparts a predetermined complex motion or manipulated manually. An electrostatic atomizer greatly increases paint transfer efficiency from the gun to the surface to be coated as compared to a non-electrostatic device. Electrostatic systems apply paint at transfer efficiencies in the 50%-80% range. Transfer efficiency rarely approaches 100%. 
     The atomized paint that is not applied to the part is generally referred to as overspray. Overspray consists of paint that misses the part due to rebound from the part surface and paint particles electrostatically deflected to other grounded surfaces such as the spray booth metal components and article conveyors. Most overspray is entrained in the spray booth exhaust air. A significant amount is deposited on the spray booth ceiling, conveyor protection and conveyor. Paint accumulating on these surfaces causes rejects when it drops off on freshly painted parts. This results in downtime for cleaning purposes. This invention relates to a means of greatly reducing paint accumulation on these surfaces. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     Among its several aspects and features, the present invention provides an electrically charged panel which repels electrically charged dry or wet coating particles inside an electrostatic spray painting booth, or other booths having charged paint or powder particles therein. The booths include an electrostatic paint sprayer which is charged to a potential of 60,000 to 135,000 volts D.C. negative with respect to ground. It produces a spray of dry or wet paint particles which is negatively charged. An object or article to be painted is at ground potential. The system comprises one or more panels or walls which are charged to a potential between the typical -100,000 volt D.C. potential with respect to ground to which a spray gun is charged and the ground potential of the target to be painted. In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the panels are charged to a potential of 30,000 volts D.C. negative with respect to ground by a power supply with current limitation. The resulting electrostatic field emanating from the panels repels the oversprayed paint particles and reduces the accumulation of paint on surfaces near the target. It may be appreciated that the panels or walls are charged to a voltage of the same sign as the electrically charged particles. The present invention provides a system for repelling negatively charged particles which overspray their intended target. 
     By reducing the accumulation of oversprayed paint on surfaces near the target, the present invention reduces the frequency with which dripping or flaking paint falls on a target during the painting process and ruins the paint job. Also, paint repelled by the charged panels is redirected back toward the target to be attracted to the same. In this way, the present invention increases the efficiency of the use of paint by reducing the amount of paint wasted on surfaces other than the target and on scrapped paint jobs. By reducing the frequency of ruined paint jobs, the present invention also increases the efficiency of the use of a painting booth by reducing the amount of time when the booth is out of service for cleaning. 
     Among its several aspects and features, the present invention also provides the aforementioned electrically charged panel which includes a conductor sheet completely enclosed in a dielectric such as plastic. The electrical field created by the charged conductor panel is not impeded by the insulation of the plastic. Used to line surfaces inside an electrostatic spray painting booth and charged to a voltage of the same sign as the electrically charged paint, the present invention repels oversprayed paint as described above, which allows painting closer to a conveyor protector or a booth ceiling. Shorter article hangers can be used and longer or larger articles to be painted can be run in the same booth. Also, the present invention reduces the capital expenditure required to build a new painting booth and other process equipment by decreasing the size of the system necessary for painting targets of a particular maximum size. The plastic surface of the panels also makes it easier to clean paint from the panels than from a surface other than plastic. Being easier to clean than other surfaces, the present invention decreases the amount of labor necessary to clean accumulated overspray from the surfaces of a painting booth. This reduction of labor increases the efficiency of the painting booth by decreasing the time when it is out of service for cleaning. 
     Briefly, the paint repelling device of the present invention includes an electrically conducting sheet having a planar surface. The device also includes an electric power source capable of placing an electric potential on the surface of the electrically conducting sheet. The device further includes means for connecting the electric power source to the electrically conducting sheet such that there is generated a repelling field of electric potential of the same sign as and of sufficient strength to repel the electrically charged paint. In the preferred embodiment, the electrically conducting plate is composed of aluminum laminated in plastic. 
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
     Referring now to the drawings: 
     FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a painting booth containing electrostatic spray painting apparatus and constructed in accordance with the invention. 
     FIGS. 2 and 3 are sectional, fragmentary views showing a paint repelling panel having a dielectric such as plastic useful as a conveyor protection device. 
     FIG. 3A is a cross sectional view of a paint repelling panel having a conductor laminated in plastic. 
     FIG. 4 is a graph showing accumulation of oversprayed paint on a paint repelling panel as a function of voltage, with respect to ground, on the panel. 
     FIG. 5 is an isometric view of a metal plate having a charge which creates an electric field to repel paint particles. 
     FIG. 6 is a side elevational view of a pair of panels embodying the instant invention suspended from a plurality of insulating stringers. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT 
     As shown in the drawings for the purposes of illustration, the invention is embodied in a booth 10 having an electrostatic paint spraying, paint applying or spray gun apparatus 11 for generating a paint spray 12 comprising a plurality of paint particles or paint droplets. The electrostatic paint applying apparatus 11 is charged to -100,000 volts D.C. by a high voltage power supply 8 having a grounded lead 8a and a lead 8b connected to the electrostatic paint applying apparatus 11. The power supply 8 and lead 8b comprise means for charging the spray gun apparatus to a first potential. The paint spray 12 is electrostatically attracted to an object, article or target 14 to be painted, having a top edge 14a. Herein, the object 14 is conveyed through the booth 10 by an overhead conveyor 16 which is enclosed by a conveyor protection housing 18 in which is pressurized air, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,749,229 and 4,207,833. The objects 14 to be spray painted are suspended on electrically conductive hangers 20. Typically, the overhead conveyor 16, the ceiling 22 and the walls 24 are grounded. The target 14 is grounded, as are the ceiling 22 and the side walls 24 of the booth 10. Thus an electrostatic field is established by the polarity and potential difference between the electrostatic paint applying apparatus 11 on the one hand and the target 14, and the other grounded members of the booth 10. The paint particles of the paint spray 12 are electrically charged, usually with a negative charge, and the grounded target 14 attracts the charged paint particles. 
     Prior to this invention, some of the paint particles 12 were not conveyed to the target 14 and became overspray particles that were electrostatically attracted to the grounded ceiling 22 or to the grounded conveyor protection housing 18. When paint adhered to the conveyer housing 18 or the ceiling 22 and did not dry, it tended to drip from those overhead structures. Other types of paint adhering to the conveyor housing 18 and the ceiling 22 tended to dry after which they would flake or chip off. The loose flakes would fall and adhere to the freshly painted surface on the target 14, causing a paint defect. Manifestly, the paint that is collected on the booth surfaces rather than on the object to be painted is wasted and the paint accumulated on the booth surfaces must be removed. This is a costly maintenance problem and the downtime of a spray booth for such maintenance detracts from the production efficiency for the booth 10. 
     In accordance with the present invention, the electrostatic paint spray particles 12 that coat the conveyer protection housing 18, the ceilings 22 and/or the walls 24 in the spray booth 10 are substantially reduced from collecting on such walls or ceilings, allowing more of the paint spray generated to be deposited on the articles 14 being painted. This is achieved by providing a plurality of panels or walls 30, each having large conductor sheets or surfaces 32, which may be aluminum sheet or foil, electrically charged to create a repelling field of the same polarity to that of the charged paint particles. The large sheet panels 30 may be positioned at areas which typically become coated with paint in a booth. The panels 30 are charged to -30,000 D.C. volts with respect to ground, which then generates a large repelling field of the same polarity as the paint particles. Typically, such charged panels may be used on the ceilings above the articles, on the exposed sides of the conveyor housing, sidewalls of the booth, or floors of the booth. Better painting efficiency is achieved because the repelled paint particles 12 will become available to adhere to the articles 14 being painted. The amount of downtime used for cleaning the booth 10 is reduced very substantially. With less paint applied to the booth ceilings 22 and the conveyor protection housings 18, there is less likelihood that overspray will accumulate and drip or flake off onto an article 14 being painted and cause a defect in the paint coating. 
     In the preferred embodiment of the invention, the electrically conductive sheets 32 of the panels 30 are protected or covered by a dielectric comprising an outer plastic layer 19 that prevents any exposure of the charged conductor to atmosphere or physical contact. New booth construction having the plastic covered, repelling panels may be made smaller, particularly in height, thereby reducing very substantially the cost of the booth. As will be explained in connection with FIG. 5, alternatively, panels or walls having thin aluminum sheets 32a which are not embedded in plastic and mounted on insulator, standoffs may be charged to a -30,000 volt D.C. potential and generate the paint repelling field. The outer dielectric layer 19 may be made of glass or porcelain rather than plastic. 
     Turning now to a more detailed description of the invention, the booth 10 is provided with the paint repelling panels 30 at the locations where the paint particles 12 are most likely to accumulate on the booth walls 24 and/or on the overhead conveyor protection housing 18, which is immediately above the article 14 being painted. Typically, the spray gun apparatus 11 is moved vertically or horizontally by automatic equipment, which is not shown, to an upper position close to the conveyor protection housing 18 at the top of the upward stroke of the spray gun 11. 
     The electrostatic paint applying apparatus 11 may be a commercially available device. In Tables I and II, the results of varying the pressure of the pattern air on a rotary atomizer from 10 psig to 30 psig to impart different velocities to the paint particles 12 are set forth. A spinning disk 11a is driven by an air-driven turbine and the turbine air pressure is variable, e.g., from 50 psig in Table I to 30 psig in Table II. Various types of electrostatic spray guns may be employed as well. 
     FIG. 1 generally shows the painting booth 10 having the paint repelling panels 30 attached to surfaces in the upper portion of the painting booth 10, including the exterior of surfaces of the conveyer protection housing 18, the ceiling 22 of painting booth 10 and the walls 24 of painting booth 10. The panels 30 are electrically connected by means of a plurality of electrical leads 25 (shown schematically) each extending from a panel to a common splitter box 28 which is connected by a cable 25, which is within a protective duct or conduit 27 partially broken away, which extends to a transformer 29, which comprises means for charging the panels 30 to a potential of -30,000 volts D.C. with respect to ground. The potential on the panels 30 is of the same sign as the charge on the electrically charged paint 12. The transformer 29 is connected by electrical conductors 25a to a limiter 28 (shown schematically) which limits the current level to the panels 30. A person skilled in the art can adapt the shape of these panels to line surfaces of diverse geometrical descriptions, whether flat, curved, bent at an angle or some combination thereof, as necessary to repel electrically charged paint. 
     FIG. 2 is a cross sectional view of the paint repelling panel 30 which shows that the paint repelling panel 30 comprises an aluminum sheet 32 sandwiched between two sheets of polypropylene 19 and 34. Aluminum sheet 32 is connected by means of electrical conductors 25 and 37 of FIG. 1 (shown schematically) to the transformer. Polypropylene surface 34 of panel 30 is contiguous with a wall within painting booth 10. The opposite polypropylene surface 19 of panel 30 faces away from surface 17 to which panel 30 is attached. By means of electric conductors 25 and 37, transformer 29 places an electric potential on aluminum sheet 32 such that the voltage on sheet 30 has the same sign as electrically charged paint to be repelled. 
     The paint repelling panel 30 operates as follows: Assuming that spray gun apparatus 11 is charged to a potential of -100,000 volts D.C. with respect to ground at its nozzle 11a, that the spray apparatus 11 is spaced from the articles and that hook 20 of overhead conveyor 16 is one foot long, then transformer 29 charges the aluminum sheets 32 of the panels to -30,000 volts D.C. with respect to ground and the spray gun 11 can operate at any height at least one foot from grounded surfaces such as articles 14. 
     The spray gun apparatus 11 sprays negatively charged paint droplets 12 at target 14. Some negatively charged paint droplets miss target and approach the panels 30. FIG. 3 generally depicts a cross sectional view of panels 30 against ceiling 22 and conveyor housing 17 repelling stray paint 60. Charged to -30,000 volts D.C. on aluminum sheet 32, panels 30 produce an electric field which repels negative charges and therefore repels negatively charged stray paint 60 which misses target 14. Repelled, paint particles 60 fall. Some of the falling, repelled, stray paint particles 60 adheres to target 14, and other portions of it may be carried off to the air filters, not shown. 
     As best seen in FIG. 1, an electrical power means 35 is provided preferably in the form of the electric transformer 29, having a rectifier for direct current output, which is connected to an A.C. power source 36 and is capable of generating the desired voltage which is preferably about -30,000 volts D.C., as shown in FIG. 4, and for the reasons given hereinafter. The voltage may be varied to suit the individual needs of the system. The current is kept very low, e.g., in a range of 10 to 50 microamperes. It is preferred to provide the transformer with a limiter 28 which detects a current rise and shuts off the transformer before an arc can occur. The limiter may be set at 10 microamperes above operating current draw, for instance, so that when the current begins to rise to signify incipient arcing the transformer may be shut off and the voltage extinguished on the panels 30. 
     The electrical power means 35 also includes the electrical conductor means 25 which is preferably in the form of an electrical cable carried in the duct 27 or other protected area so that it will not be damaged. The conductor means also includes an electrical lead 37 from each separate panel to the cable, and the cable extends from the transformer and a control panel (not shown) through the booth to each of the panels. Because the transformer has a high power generation, it may be coupled to a plurality of adjacent booths. 
     The panels 30 for the walls and ceiling may be large panels e.g., four feet by eight feet or three feet by six feet. In the panel 30 shown in FIG. 3A, the interior metal sheet 32 of aluminum which may be as thin as an aluminum foil is sandwiched between a paint repelling outer plastic layer 19 and an inner plastic layer 34. The preferred plastic layer material is polypropylene which can be easily cleaned of paint. At edges 19a and 34a of the sheets, a weld 51 of polypropylene provides a thick bead to encase the edges 32a of the metal sheet 32. Thus, the metal sheet 34 is surrounded on all sides and edges by plastic. If desired, the metal sheet could have plastic molded about it to completely embed the sheet without welding. Extending the edges of the plastic panel to double the arcing distance of the 30,000 volts D.C. will also effectively isolate the metal conductor from ground. Herein, the plastic layer 19 facing the paint is only about 1/16 inch thick and the protectoral plastic layer 34 against the metal housing wall 58 is about 1/4 inch thick. 
     In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5, thin metal foil sheet panels 30a are mounted by insulator standoffs 74 on the metal sheet wall 58 of the booth or on the metal wall of the protective conveyor device. An electrical lead 37 is connected to the metal panel 30a to provide the voltage potential desired, e.g., -30,000 volts D.C. at the panel 30a. The standoffs isolate electrically the metal booth wall 58, which will be grounded, from the -30,000 volts D.C. at the panel. 
     As may best be seen in FIG. 6, the panels 30 also may be suspended from a structure 100, which may be a booth 10 or other adjacent the booth 10, by a plurality of threaded, metal rod-type hangars 102. Each of the stringers 102 comprises a nut or threaded block 104 which engages the structure 100. An elongated threaded metal rod 106 threadedly engages the nut or block 104. The elongated rods 106 extend to the panels 30 and are threadedly connected to polypropylene blocks 108 welded to the panels, which also engage and support the panels 30. It may be appreciated that the stringers 102 allow the panels 30 to be positioned at a variety of distances from the structure 100 and in a variety of orientations with respect to it, thereby providing the booth operator with ability to tailor the electrostatic paint repelling effects of the panels to many different booths. 
     The panels need not be solid panels of metal as above-described but also may be made of metal mesh. Alternately, a good electrical conductive material other than metal could be used in or with the panels 30 or 30a such as conductive coatings or salts. 
     The following experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the present invention at protecting ceilings and conveyors in an electrostatic paint spraying booth by repelling electrically charged paint particles: 
     Experiment I: Ceiling Protection Test 
     This experiment compared the amount of stray paint which accumulated on a grounded foil panel 30a above the rotary atomizer to the amount of paint which accumulated on a sheet of aluminum 30a in the same location charged to voltages of -20 and -30 kilovolts D.C. The data shows that less paint accumulated on the charged aluminum panel than on the grounded foil panel. 
     For each set of conditions, a baseline was established by setting the positions of a sheet metal part (target) 14 and the atomizer 14 with respect to the ceiling 22 of the painting booth, attaching a weighed, foil sheet 30a to the plastic isolating panel, grounding the foil sheet and painting the target for 60 seconds. The foil sheet 30a was then removed from the plastic panel, dried and weighed. The amount of accumulated, stray paint was calculated by subtracting the weight of the panel before painting from its dry weight after painting. New, weighed foil sheets 30a were used for each test. 
     After establishing the baseline, aluminum panels were substituted for the foil panels, run at -20 and -30 kilovolts D.C. negative and isolated from ground. Tests were run with the rotary atomizer at 12, 18 and 24 inches from the ceiling panel. (The vertical position of the target was also varied for some tests.) Each set of panels was dried and weighed, and the percent reduction in paint deposited compared to the grounded panel was calculated. Table I shows the results: 
     
                                           TABLE I                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
ATOMIZER                                                                  
        PATTERN                                                           
              VOLTAGE                                                     
                     TURBINE                                              
                           WT. GAIN                                       
                                  %                                       
TO CEILING                                                                
        AIR   ON FOIL                                                     
                     AIR   ON PANEL                                       
                                  REDUCTION                               
__________________________________________________________________________
18&#34;     20 psig                                                           
              Ground 30 psig                                              
                           16.76  --                                      
18&#34;     20 psig                                                           
              -30 KV 30 psig                                              
                           4.39   74%                                     
24&#34;     20 psig                                                           
              Ground 50 psig                                              
                           4.38   --                                      
24&#34;     20 psig                                                           
              -30 KV 50 psig                                              
                           0.09   98%                                     
18&#34;     30 psig                                                           
              Ground 50 psig                                              
                           13.85  --                                      
18&#34;     30 psig                                                           
              -30 KV 50 psig                                              
                           1.55   89%                                     
18&#34;     20 psig                                                           
              Ground 50 psig                                              
                           18.93  --                                      
18&#34;     20 psig                                                           
              -30 KV 50 psig                                              
                           5.36   72%                                     
18&#34;     30 psig                                                           
              Ground 50 psig                                              
                           13.85                                          
18&#34;     30 psig                                                           
              -30 KV 50 psig                                              
                           7.32   47%                                     
18&#34;     30 psig                                                           
              Isolated                                                    
                     50 psig                                              
                           5.94   57%                                     
24&#34;     30 psig                                                           
              Ground 50 psig                                              
                           4.22                                           
24&#34;     30 psig                                                           
              -30 KV 50 psig                                              
                           0.05     98.8%                                 
__________________________________________________________________________
 
    
     In Table I, where the foil was at &#34;Ground&#34; without any repelling charge, the paint weight gain on the panel was much greater than when 20 or 30 KV D.C. was applied to the foil to cause it to repel paint particles. This difference in weight gain is reflected as the &#34;% Reduction&#34; which range from 74% to 98% in these tests. 
     Experiment II: Conveyor Protection Test 
     This experiment compared the amount of paint which accumulated on a grounded foil sheet which was placed around the conveyor housing to the percent of paint which accumulated on an aluminum panel in the same location charged to -30,000 volts D.C. 
     Table II shows the results: 
     
                                           TABLE II                                
__________________________________________________________________________
ATOMIZER                                %                                 
&amp;       TURBINE                                                           
              PATTERN                                                     
                    VOLTAGE                                               
                           TURBINE                                        
                                 WT. GAIN                                 
                                        REDUC-                            
PROTECTOR                                                                 
        V     AIR-PSI                                                     
                    FOIL   AIR   ON PANEL                                 
                                        TION                              
__________________________________________________________________________
18&#34;      -85 KV                                                           
              10    Ground 30    0.30*  --                                
12&#34;      -85 KV                                                           
              10    Ground 30    12.85                                    
12&#34;      -85 KV                                                           
              10    -30 KV 30    0.52   96%                               
12&#34;      -85 KV                                                           
              10    Ground 50    15.83                                    
12&#34;      -85 KV                                                           
              10    -30 KV 50    1.58   90%                               
12&#34;     -115 KV                                                           
              30    Ground 50    19.80                                    
12&#34;     -115 KV                                                           
              30    -30 KV 50    0.35   98%                               
18&#34;     -115 KV                                                           
              30    Ground 50    9.91                                     
18&#34;     -115 KV                                                           
              30    -30 KV 50    0.07    99+%                             
__________________________________________________________________________
 *SINCE WEIGHT GAIN WAS SMALL, DISCONTINUED TEST AT THIS DISTANCE AND     
 VOLTAGE                                                                  
 
    
     Table II demonstrates that a 90% to 99% reduction in paint accumulation on the conveyor housing 18 may be achieved by having protective, repelling panels 30 added to the conveyor housing 18. 
     Experiment III: Ceiling Protection Test 
     This experiment compared the amount of stray paint which accumulated on a grounded foil sheet 30a which was placed on the booth ceiling to the amount of stray paint which accumulated on an aluminum panel in the same location charged to -30,000 volts D.C. The data shows that considerably less paint accumulated on the charged aluminum panel than on the grounded foil panel. 
     For each set of test conditions, a baseline was established by setting the positions of a sheet metal part (target) and the atomizer (spray gun) with respect to the ceiling conveyor housing, attaching a weighed, foil sheet to the plastic protector (around the ceiling conveyor housing), grounding the foil sheet and painting the target for 60 seconds. The foil sheet was then removed from the plastic protector, dried and weighed. The amount of accumulated, stray paint was calculated by subtracting the weight of the panel before painting from its dry weight after painting. New, weighed foil sheets were used for each test. 
     After the baseline had been established, aluminum panels were charged to -30,000 volts D.C. with respect to ground with the spray gun centerline at 3, 6 and 9 inches from the plastic protector around the conveyor housing. Table III shows the results: 
     
                                           TABLE III                               
__________________________________________________________________________
USING 115 KV GRACO AIR SPRAY GUN                                          
                            WEIGHT                                        
          PROTECTOR PROTECTOR                                             
                            GAIN  %                                       
GUN VOLTAGE                                                               
          VOLTAGE   TO GUN CL                                             
                            (GRAINS)                                      
                                  REDUCTION                               
__________________________________________________________________________
-115 KV   Ground    3&#34;      4.54  --                                      
-115 KV   -30 KV (Graco)                                                  
                    3&#34;      2.24  51%                                     
-115 KV   -40 KV (Graco)                                                  
                    3&#34;      2.44  46%                                     
-115 KV   -30 KV (Spellman)                                               
                    3&#34;      2.25    50.5%                                 
-115 KV   Ground    6&#34;      2.05  --                                      
-115 KV   -30 KV (Graco)                                                  
                    6&#34;      0.92  55%                                     
-115 KV   -30 KV (Graco)                                                  
                    6&#34;      0.72  65%                                     
-115 KV   -40 KV (Graco)                                                  
                    6&#34;      0.54  74%                                     
-115 KV   -50 KV (Graco)                                                  
                    6&#34;      0.32  84%                                     
-115 KV   -30 KV (Spellman)                                               
                    6&#34;      0.59    71.5%                                 
-115 KV   -30 KV (Spellman)                                               
                    9&#34;      *1.72  98%+                                   
-115 KV   Ground            *84.94                                        
-115 KV   Ground            3.11                                          
-115 KV   -30 KV (Spellman) 0.18  94%                                     
__________________________________________________________________________
 *30 MINUTE TESTPAINT DRIPPED FROM GROUNDED PANEL 50 WT. IS LESS THAN     
 ACTUAL.                                                                  
 
    
     When the spray gun 11 is very close to the &#34;Protector&#34; panel 30, e.g., three inches, the velocity of the particles overcome the repelling force from the panel, and the paint reduction ranges from 46% to 51%. When the gun pattern centerline is at nine inches from the bottom edge of the protector panel, the reduction of paint accumulation ranged from 94% to 98%. 
     Experiment IV: Conveyor Protection Test 
     In this experiment the gun centerline was run at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 inches from the bottom of the plastic protector around the conveyor housing. Table IV shows the results: 
     
                                           TABLE IV                                
__________________________________________________________________________
                       WEIGHT                                             
GUN    PROTECTOR                                                          
               PROTECTOR                                                  
                       GAIN  %                                            
VOLTAGE                                                                   
       VOLTAGE TO GUN CL                                                  
                       (GRAINS)                                           
                             REDUCTION                                    
__________________________________________________________________________
-60    Ground  0&#34;      3.42                                               
-60    -30 KV  0&#34;      0.84    75.5%                                      
-60    Ground  3&#34;      1.04  --                                           
-60    -30 KV  3&#34;      0.08  92%                                          
-60    Ground  6&#34;      0.54  --                                           
-60    -30 KV  6&#34;      0.12  78%                                          
-60    Ground  9&#34;      0.05                                               
-60    -30 KV  9&#34;      --    100%                                         
-60    Ground  12&#34;     0.05                                               
-60    -30 KV  12&#34;     --    100%                                         
__________________________________________________________________________
 
    
     FIG. 4 depicts a graph having a curve 70 which shows how accumulation of stray paint varies according to the voltage on the panel 30 when the spray gun 11 is charged to -100,000 volts D.C. at a distance of at least ten inches from the target and no closer than 6 inches from the paint repelling panel. Curve 70 shows that the paint repelling panel minimizes accumulation of stray paint when it is charged to -30,000 volts D.C. 
     Those skilled in the art can calibrate the paint repelling panel with the appropriate amount of voltage necessary to repel electrically charged, oversprayed paint according to the mass, volume and charge of the paint droplets, the velocity of the paint droplets as they leave the spray gun, the voltage on the spray gun and the distance of the spray gun from the target and panel. 
     The foregoing shows that the invention achieves several objectives and attains other advantageous results. 
     Because one could change the above constructions in various ways without departing from the scope of the invention, the applicant herein intends that all matter contained in the above description or shown in the accompanying drawings shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.