Patent Publication Number: US-2009221206-A1

Title: Spinning apparatus for producing fine threads by splicing

Description:
The invention relates to a spinning device for producing fine threads by splitting according to the preamble of the main claim. 
     Fine threads into the range below 1 micrometre (μm) can be produced by splitting a thread-forming fluid flow as a melt, solution or in general as liquids which are subsequently made to solidify, as has been described in DE 199 29 709 and DE 100 65 859. The mechanism of thread formation is fundamentally different from all the spinning methods which have become known to date where the spinning material is withdrawn by winding-up devices from the spinning nozzles to form threads or, in the case of spunbond methods, by accompanying airflows which exert a force on them and, in a special embodiment, in the so-called meltblown methods, where the air drawing the thread emerges right beside the spinning nozzle openings heated to approx. spinning material temperature. The thread speed thereby achieves that of the winding or is below that of the air- or gas flows drawing it. This applies to the average of thread diameters, however individual “mavericks” are discovered during the meltblown method where also finer diameters can arise than that from throughput and maximum possible withdrawal speed, the greatest air speed, but still not in a targeted manner as happens in the mentioned new method, also termed Nanoval method. Here the following effect is used according to a new mechanism, only explained recently from hydrodynamic basic rules, see L. Gerking in Chemical Fibers International 54 (2004) pp. 261-262 and 56 (2006), pp. 57-59: if a melt—or in general fluid thread or—film is impinged upon by shear stresses externally, then the result in the interior thereof is a pressure build-up if the speed on the outer skin of the fluid jet is greater than that in the interior thereof and this is even more the case the greater is the acceleration thereof that can be achieved after emergence from the spinning opening. This is, one can say, the reverse of flow in pipes or channels (Hagen-Poiseuille) where the pressure energy is used to overcome the friction on the channel walls whilst, in the case of the new spinning method, energy is transmitted to the thread by the shear stresses acting thereon from the exterior. Said thread attempts to counteract this by a pressure increase in the interior. If not only the outer skin is cooled by the gas flow surrounding it then the result can be solidification of the thread. 
     In the case of polymers and polymer solutions with their basically low heat conductivity, firstly however only an outer skin of increasing viscosity is formed and the hydrodynamic effects can act in the interior of the thread. The result then is, with good regularity and reproducibility, a bursting which is comparable with the bursting of pipe on its longitudinal join with astonishingly essentially continuous threads and, in view of the stochastic character of the splitting, of a low distribution width in the thread diameter. The number of individual threads produced in this way exceeds, in the production of particularly fine threads, in the range around and below 1 μm, up to several hundreds from one liquid jet. 
     The Nanoval method is carried out in lines of nozzles in its industrial applications, a series of spinning orifices being located above a gap. The gas, in general air, without particular conditioning after its production in fans or compressors (the energy requirement is fundamentally low compared with the meltblown methods) flows at both sides of the line of nozzles in constant acceleration towards the narrowest cross-section of the gap which then again generally rapidly widens, basically however has the configuration of a Laval nozzle. Also individual round nozzles were described surrounded by an annular gap which constantly reduces towards the narrowest cross-section. 
     It has been shown that the shear forces acting on the thread on all sides by a rotationally symmetrical gas flow lead to a smaller average diameter of the essentially continuous threads which are produced by splitting, which can be attributed to the more uniform impingement of the thread, irrespective of whether the air is also heated additionally or not. Also the cooling which, in interplay, causes the bursting effect with the hydrodynamic forces is distributed more uniformly around the thread than happens in the case of merely lateral impingement in the lines of nozzles with a linear Laval nozzle configuration and less air is consumed. In the case of the lines of nozzles, a part of the air is used more poorly in the intermediate spaces from thread to thread. 
     A further influential factor for the production of fine and ever finer threads, as can be produced otherwise for example only by electrospinning methods, however in very small throughputs and with a high spatial and safety expenditure because of the required high voltage, is the throughput per spinning nozzle opening, irrespective of whether with round or slot-shaped openings for the spinning material. The gas speed in the narrowest cross-section of the Laval nozzle can achieve the speed of sound, thereafter in the widened section even into ultrasound, which then, in the case of this flow laden with threads, generally leads rapidly to subsonic sound by means of compression shocks. However, only a specific shape changing operation can be performed by the shear stress forces in the case of a given running surface of the still deformable thread material. The throughputs are consequently fundamentally lower when producing very fine threads in the range around and below 1 μm. This leads to the fact that, for a specific total throughput when producing nonwovens according to the Nanoval method for finer threads, more spinning nozzles are used over the width. This applies correspondingly in the production of yarns. 
     The object underlying the invention is to produce a device for producing fine threads which is compact and constructionally simple, a good start to spinning being intended to be possible. 
     This object is achieved according to the invention by the characterising features of the main claim in conjunction with the features of the preamble. 
     As a result of the features represented in the sub-claims, advantageous developments and improvements are possible. 
     As a result of the fact that the device for producing fine threads has at least one spinning nozzle part which is equipped with spinning nozzles and at least one partially plate-shaped gas nozzle part with at least one gas supply chamber, the at least partially plate-shaped gas nozzle part having a plurality of funnel-shaped depressions as acceleration nozzles into which the spinning nozzles engage in such a manner that combinations of spinning nozzles/acceleration nozzles, in particular Laval nozzles, with rotationally symmetrical gas flow channels are formed, the device can be constructed compactly with a large number of closely adjacent combinations, gas nozzle part and spinning nozzle part being displaceable relative to each other so that the gas flow channels which are formed between gas nozzle part and spinning nozzles of the spinning nozzle part can have different flow cross-sections, as a result of which the height of the spinning openings can be adjusted to the narrowest cross-section of the acceleration nozzles, in particular Laval nozzles. As a result, the start of spinning is facilitated and made possible for the first time ever with a plurality of nozzles which are adjacent and in succession in that the gas nozzle part is withdrawn relative to the spinning nozzle part towards the latter in order not to impair the arriving thread run. At the same time, maintenance and cleaning of the spinning nozzles is facilitated as a result of the displaceability. 
     A particularly simple construction is provided if the gas chamber is formed between the underside of the spinning nozzle part, out of which the spinning nozzles or spinning nipples protrude, and the upper side of the plate-shaped region of the gas nozzle part, the gas, usually air, being supplied to the acceleration nozzles via said gas chamber. 
     It is particularly advantageous to provide a self-adjusting seal between the spinning nozzle part and gas nozzle part, which is compressed when introducing the gas during spinning by the then resulting pressure. 
     An advantageous embodiment, although somewhat more complex and in particular when supplying “cold” air, resides in configuring the gas nozzle part as a hollow body which is engaged by the depressions and the cavity of which between the depressions forms the gas chamber, the hollow body having openings which are directed towards the spinning nozzle part, preferably rotationally symmetrically about the depressions, via which the air or the gas passes towards the acceleration nozzles. 
     A plurality of nozzle parts and gas nozzle parts can be disposed adjacently, different spinning materials also being able to be spun. 
     Advantageously, a further plate with openings can be disposed below the plate-shaped region of the gas nozzle part, forming a distributor chamber for a further fluid. This fluid can be water for coagulating dissolved fibre materials, coolant for freezing the molecular orientation achieved during the splitting, means for heating, e.g. steam, for a second stretching or the like. 
    
    
     
       The invention is represented in the drawing and is explained in more detail in the subsequent description. There are shown: 
         FIG. 1  a longitudinal section through a first embodiment of the spinning device according to the invention corresponding to the section lines D-D according to  FIG. 2 , 
         FIG. 2  a section of the device according to the invention according to the section lines C-C of  FIG. 1 , 
         FIG. 3  a section through a part of the device according to the invention according to a second embodiment corresponding to the section line A-A in  FIG. 4 , and 
         FIG. 4  a section through the device corresponding to the section line B-B in  FIG. 3 . 
     
    
    
     The spinning device represented in  FIGS. 1 and 2  has a spinning nozzle part  28  in which a plurality of melt channels  14  is provided, said melt channels being provided via a filter  25  and a perforated plate  26  for cleaning supplied melt or solution with melt or solution. The melt channels continue into spinning nozzles or spinning nipples  23 , only three rows of spinning nipples  23  being shown here. A plurality of spinning nipples can perfectly well be provided in succession in the direction of travel according to arrow  50 . 
     The lower plate-shaped region of the spinning nozzle part is received in a gas nozzle part  27  which comprises a frame-like edging  34  and a plate-like part  35 , in the latter three respectively offset rows of Laval nozzles  36  being provided corresponding to the rows of spinning nipples  23 . The edging  34  is provided with an upright edge, a seal  33  being disposed between this upright edge and a surface  32 , which is situated opposite said upright edge, of the lower region of the spinning nozzle part  28 . 
     The spinning- and the gas nozzle part  28 ,  27  are aligned relative to each other such that the tip of the spinning nipples  23  protrudes into the Laval nozzles  36 , a gas chamber  22  being formed between the lower surface of the spinning nozzle part  28  and the upper surface of the plate-shaped region  35  of the gas nozzle part, through which gas chamber the spinning nipples  23  engage and which is connected to gas or air supply lines  20  provided in the edging. 
     In particular if the supplied air is cold, the spinning nipples  23  are preferably provided with a heating means  24 , advantageously with a belt heating means, as is known from injection moulding tools in plastic material machine construction. 
     The device according to the invention has means for displacement of the spinning- and gas nozzle part  28 ,  27  relative to each other, a screw  29  being guided, in the present embodiment, in a split nut  30  which is securely connected to the spinning nozzle part and is connected in an anchor  31  in the frame  34  of the gas nozzle part  27  to the latter, the anchor  31  being able to exert a pressure or tension force according to the direction of rotation of the screw  29 , as a result of which the gas nozzle part is displaced. Of course, other types of displacement means are possible. 
     For the start of spinning, the gas nozzle part  27  is raised, i.e. displaced upwards in  FIG. 1 , as result of which the seal  33  is relieved of pressure. If, after arrival, the gas  21  is supplied via the supply line  20 , a pressure force on the seal  33  is increased by the pressure in the gas chamber  22  in addition to a displacement of the gas nozzle part  27  downwards. Hence a specific self-adjustment of the seal is produced upon arrival of the melt or solution and release of the Laval nozzle cross-section towards the individual spinning nipples. 
     In order to clean the spinning nipples  23 , the gas supply  21  is switched off, the gas nozzle part  27  is raised until the plate part  35  abuts against the spinning nipples  23  with the wall of the Laval nozzles  35 . The air present in the region of the seal  33  and the surface  32  is thereby blown out. The nipples  23  protrude out of the Laval nozzles and can be cleaned. 
     The device represented in  FIG. 3  has a spinning nozzle part  1  with a series of raised portions or projections, preferably in conical form, which receive or form the spinning nozzles  13 . For example, the spinning nozzle part can be configured as a plate into which the spinning nozzles  13  (similarly to  FIG. 1 ) are inserted. The spinning nozzles have melt or solution channels  14  which end in a spinning nozzle opening  3 . 
     Furthermore, a gas nozzle part  2  is provided which is configured for example as a hollow body which is formed by two plates provided with funnel-shaped depressions. Between the plates, a cavity  9  is formed which is interrupted by the funnel-shaped depressions. The cavity  9  serves as gas chamber which is in turn connected to a gas supply source. Around each funnel-shaped depression, an annular opening  4  is incorporated, the openings  4  represented in section in  FIG. 3  being intended corresponding to  FIG. 4  in common for adjacent funnel-shaped depressions, i.e. in the embodiment, the funnel-shaped depressions are disposed closely adjacently. 
     The conical raised portions which form the spinning nozzles  13  engage in the depressions of the gas nozzle part  2  such that rotationally symmetrical gas flow channels  5  are produced. In the represented embodiment, respectively in the intermediate space between the spinning nozzles  13  which are represented in  FIG. 3  as depressions, yet another insulating formed part  11  is introduced which forms an air gap  12  and extends up to the spinning opening  3  so that the gas flow channel  5  between the surface of the formed part  11  and surface of the depression in part  2  is formed around the space  9 . The respective gas flow channel  5  is thereby configured such that it tapers in the direction of the respective spinning opening  3  around which the respective depression engages rotationally symmetrically. Hence respectively a Laval nozzle is produced, the cross-section of which widens abruptly at the edge between depression and outer surface of the lower plate in  FIG. 3 , which however can also take place gradually. 
     The spinning nozzle part  1  and the gas nozzle part  2  are displaceable relative to each other, viewed according to  FIG. 3 , in the perpendicular direction, which can be achieved by sliding rods, not shown. Consequently, the height of the narrowest position  6  of the Laval nozzle can be adjusted relative to the spinning opening  3 , as a result of which the start of spinning can also be facilitated. 
     These sliding rods can absorb force produced at the same time with different expansions of the spinning nozzle- 1  and of the gas nozzle part  2 , as a result of which the positioning of both parts relative to each other is maintained. 
     In  FIG. 4 , two rows of combinations of spinning nozzles  13  and Laval nozzles, ending at the narrowest cross-section  6  are represented, the spinning nozzles  13  of one row being offset relative to those of the other rows. It is possible in particular with greater spinning beam widths that special gas distribution channels are also provided between adjacent rows in order to supply the required gas quantities to the Laval nozzles. 
     The mode of operation is dealt with in the following. 
     In  FIG. 3 , the melt is supplied in part  1  and emerges in the spinning nozzle openings  3 , whilst the gas, subsequently termed air, flows out of the space  9  in part  2  after emergence via the annular opening  4  towards the channel  5 , which is rotationally symmetrical relative to the spinning nozzle opening  3 , between part  1  and  2  towards the narrowest cross-section  6  and in advance grips the emerging thread  7  at the spinning opening  3 , accelerates it, i.e. reduces it in diameter and, according to the Nanoval effect, causes it already in the Laval nozzle or shortly thereafter to burst into a thread bundle  8  like a brush. 
     Whilst the start of spinning with a line of nozzles takes place simply by pushing together two channel halves which form the Laval nozzles, this is not possible in the case of nozzle combinations in a plurality of rows. The part  2  can however be displaced in the direction of the thread emergence axis. As a result, it can be entirely drawn back when starting spinning towards the formed part  11 , an expulsion of spinning air via the openings  4  can initially be stopped or permitted to a small extent. Then the part  2  is lowered, spinning of the thread is started, it is drawn and made to burst according to the setting data known from the method for the air speed from the applied pressure in the space  9  of part  2 , for the flowing spinning material from the openings  3  and at the temperature of the spinning material required for splitting. Said material is advantageously heated in addition just before emergence from the spinning openings  3 , indicated by heating means  10 , the introduction and mounting of which has been dispensed with for the sake of clarity of the drawing. In order that the flowing air does not cool impermissibly at lower temperatures than the spinning material temperature, the formed part  11  is configured such that it, on the one hand, forms the inner wall of the rotationally symmetrical channel  5  for constant acceleration of the air until close to the spinning nozzle opening  3  but, via an air gap  12 , also insulates the spinning nozzle  13  with respect to heat against the airflow in the flow channel  5 . The formed part  11  can however also contain heating means of the spinning nozzles instead of the spinning nozzle part  1 . 
     The two basic positions of the movable part  2  are indicated in  FIG. 3 , in dotted lines for the start of the spinning process. 
       FIG. 4  shows a horizontal section B-B (in  FIG. 3 ) as section through a multirow nozzle device for two rows of nozzles in order to illustrate the air supply from the exterior to the individual spinning nozzles  13  for supply from the space  9  via the openings  4  into the channels  5  which end respectively at the smallest cross-section  6 . 
     In the case of a greater air requirement, i.e. in the case of larger nonwoven and hence spinning beam widths, main distributor channels can be fitted between the nozzle openings, only the rows of individual nozzles moving apart slightly in the nonwoven running direction because the spinning nozzle device according to the invention has the advantage as spinning beam at the same time that it forms a plurality of spinning beams in succession viewed in the nonwoven running direction. Each has its specific irregularities, even from hole to hole, as in the case shown here with spinning nozzle and Laval nozzle beyond the nonwoven width. A statistical compensation for greater nonwoven uniformity can take place between the individual rows because the threads of the following rows increasingly cover the sparse positions of the preceding ones. 
     If in addition gas or air or a liquid medium for accompaniment of solutions is desired for cooling or keeping warm during spinning of said solutions also for coagulation of the threads, then this medium can easily be introduced as third fluid flow between the spinning and Laval nozzles and be made to flow out. This is illustrated in  FIG. 1  by a plate  37  which is provided with openings  38  respectively below the spinning nipples  23  and the Laval nozzle-like openings  36 . Similarly as with the air supply to the space  22 , the third fluid flow, at  39  according to arrow  40 , can be introduced into the space  41  formed between the plates  35  and  37 . It passes from there via the upper edges of the openings  38  into the thread air flow. This can take place for example by introducing the coagulation of pulp from lyocell solution threads, as described in DE 100 65 859 in more detail. The size of the openings  38  and their position relative to the spinning nipples  23  can be easily coordinated to the main flow of the thread with the surrounding gas. All three fluids thereby flow downwards (in the drawing). 
     The device is also fundamentally suitable for spinning different spinning materials in the individual spinning nozzles, for which purpose the melt- or spinning solution distribution must be correspondingly arranged, i.e. alternating transversely relative to the direction of travel or also differently from row to row. It is hence possible to produce mixed nonwovens in order to achieve special effects, such as the spinning of binding threads in matrix threads, e.g. polypropylene as binding threads and polyester as the matrix which provides strength or by means of a portion of more greatly shrinking threads in order, after the nonwoven deposition, to achieve higher volumes and softness as a result of shrinkage of the entire thread web and also other nonwoven properties by means of two or more different components. Also bicomponent or multicomponent threads can be produced without difficulty by supplying two or more spinning materials into the spinning nozzle part and into the channels  14 . With different throughputs, adjusted by opening cross-sections of the spinning nozzle openings of different sizes or by controlled melt supply to the latter, a different type of mixed nonwoven can be produced. 
     The present device has in addition the advantage that it connects the melt-guiding spinning nozzle parts  1  or  28  to the colder gas nozzle parts  2  or  27 , in fact in a mutually displaceable manner but securely transversely relative thereto. After heating part  1  with heating means, not shown here, part  1  will expand more relative to  2  if no particularly heated air is supplied from part  2  so that respectively spinning boring  3  and narrowest cross-section  6  show deviations over the width and length, the same is true for parts  28  and  27 . The connection can take place by means of sliding rods, not shown, which prevent this deviation with respect to the forces, said sliding rods being able to be disposed in the plates of the spinning nozzle part  1  and of the gas nozzle part between the combinations of spinning nozzle/Laval nozzle. In order to prevent the different expansion, heating of the air flow in the flow channel  5  can however also be undertaken intentionally. 
     Guiding part  1 , which is initially set back relative to the spinning boring opening  3 , and later is displaced in the running direction of the thread  7  in order to produce the splitting effect, must take place by means of guides or sliding rods which are known in tool construction. The introduction of air, likewise not shown here, takes place from the exterior to the front, rear or side on the spinning beam, a seal requiring to be present between spinning nozzle part  1  and gas nozzle part  2  or because a few millimetres of guidance length between  1  and  2  suffice, the chambers  9  shown in  FIG. 4  can also be fed via corrugated bellows around the spinning beam and an outer distribution chamber. 
     It is now also possible in a simple manner to divide spinning beam of a larger width into a plurality of nozzle fields, these in turn comprising numerous individual spinning nozzle/Laval nozzle combinations so that individual ones of these packets (spinning packs) can be exchanged in the case of blockages of the spinning openings or other disruptions. The separating gaps are then arranged diagonally relative to the running direction, the spinning nozzle openings, as shown in  FIG. 4 , being disposed respectively on the gap of the previous one. 
     The following example shows the use of the device in the splitting spinning method according to Nanoval and the thread values achieved for example. A polypropylene melt was distributed to nineteen spinning nozzles  13 , disposed in a row, with inlet borings for the melt  14  and spinning nozzle openings with a diameter of 0.3 mm. In the thread running direction, there was situated thereafter for each of these openings a Laval nozzle with the narrowest cross-section of 3 mm diameter which was guided back to the spinning opening after the start of spinning. The polymer throughput was changed in regions as reproduced in Table 1, likewise the air pressure and hence the flowing air speed in the region of the shear stresses on the thread leading to splitting. The temperature of the polypropylene melt could be heated in the spinning nozzles  13  by approx. a further 20° C. shortly before emergence thereof from the spinning opening via electrical heating elements. 
     For a device according to  FIGS. 1 ,  2 , no substantially different results are produced with the same method data. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Thread results polypropylene (PP) MFI 28 
               
               
                 Melt index at 230° C. and 2.16 kg 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 Melt 
                   
                 Air 
                   
                 Thread result 
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 m o   
                 T S   
                 Δp k   
                 T L   
                 d 50   
                 CV 
                 d min   
                 d max   
               
               
                 g/min 
                 ° C. 
                 mbar 
                 ° C. 
                 μm 
                 % 
                 μm 
                 μm 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 1.5 
                 330 
                 403 
                 43 
                 3.9 
                 38 
                 1.72 
                 8.2 
               
               
                   
                 330 
                 600 
                 47 
                 2.2 
                 23 
                 1.22 
                 3.6 
               
               
                   
                 330 
                 800 
                 56 
                 2.2 
                 45 
                 0.87 
                 4.4 
               
               
                   
                 334 
                 400 
                 230 
                 1.5 
                 47 
                 0.87 
                 3.5 
               
               
                   
                 335 
                 600 
                 230 
                 2.0 
                 40 
                 0.67 
                 3.8 
               
               
                   
                 336 
                 800 
                 233 
                 1.5 
                 40 
                 0.78 
                 3.1 
               
               
                 3.0 
                 344 
                 400 
                 230 
                 2.4 
                 33 
                 0.61 
                 3.9 
               
               
                   
                 344 
                 600 
                 230 
                 2.1 
                 33 
                 1.12 
                 3.4 
               
               
                   
                 344 
                 800 
                 230 
                 1.5 
                 47 
                 0.44 
                 3.4 
               
               
                   
                 352 
                 400 
                 46 
                 2.1 
                 48 
                 0.77 
                 4.9 
               
               
                   
                 352 
                 600 
                 46 
                 1.2 
                 42 
                 0.31 
                 2.2 
               
               
                   
                 352 
                 800 
                 46 
                 1.3 
                 31 
                 0.48 
                 2.3 
               
               
                   
                 351 
                 600 
                 180 
                 1.2 
                 33 
                 0.63 
                 2.3 
               
               
                   
                 351 
                 600 
                 220 
                 1.0 
                 40 
                 0.44 
                 1.8 
               
               
                   
                 351 
                 600 
                 220 
                 1.1 
                 27 
                 0.49 
                 1.8 
               
               
                   
               
               
                 m o  polymer throughput per spinning boring 
               
               
                 T S  melt temperature 
               
               
                 Δp k  air pressure before acceleration in the Laval nozzle 
               
               
                 T L  air temperature at the same place 
               
               
                 d 50  average thread diameter from 20 individual measurements on the microscope screen 
               
               
                 CV statistical scatter/d 50  · 100% variation coefficient of the produced thread diameters 
               
               
                 d min  smallest measured thread diameter respectively 
               
            
           
         
       
     
     It is obvious that, not necessarily only at higher air pressures, i.e. higher air speeds, higher air temperatures and lower throughputs, the fine threads could be produced down to approx. 0.5 μm=500 nanometres (nm) but that this was also achieved at greater throughputs of 3 g/min and hole, for which purpose the temperature of the melt was however increased before emergence thereof from 335 to 352° C., the air temperature remained initially, at the higher throughput of 3.0 g/min, still in the range of that produced by the compression and the increase at otherwise constant values to 180° C. produced no measurable influence in the direction of higher fineness. Only an air temperature increased to 220° C. then produced the value d 50 =1 μm with minimum diameters of 0.44 measured in the microscope. A thread measurement as here with the microscope can however no longer claim high precision since the range is already that of lightwave length. In any case, unequivocal dependencies are there which initially are surprising from the point of view of conventional spinning. If it is recalled however that here threads are produced by bursting, i.e. fragmentation, then rules other than those of pure length drawing, are in operation as described above, which lead to the fact that individual parameters can be changed, such as for example the melt temperature relative to the gas speed, with the same effect on the resulting average thread diameter and even its scatter. 
     Although the device according to the invention is intended primarily for the production of fine threads, also coarser ones can be spun with it, as a result of which the versatility thereof is displayed. Thus, threads made of polyester and polylactide were produced, as reproduced in Tables 2 and 3. The diameter of the spinning nozzle openings was 1.0 mm. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Thread results polyester (PET) i.v. = 0.64 
               
               
                 intrinsic viscosity (textile type) 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 m o   
                 T S   
                 Δp k   
                 T L   
                 d 50   
                 CV 
                 d min   
                 d max   
               
               
                 g/min 
                 ° C. 
                 Mbar 
                 ° C. 
                 μm 
                 % 
                 μm 
                 μm 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 5.2 
                 288 
                 550 
                 108 
                 10.1 
                 47 
                 4.1 
                 20.0 
               
               
                   
                 332 
                 1000 
                 271 
                 4.2 
                 43 
                 1.5 
                 9.9 
               
               
                 10.0 
                 299 
                 500 
                 270 
                 15.3 
                 23 
                 7.4 
                 19.8 
               
               
                   
                 271 
                 1000 
                 106 
                 19.0 
                 35 
                 8.0 
                 26.9 
               
               
                 15.0 
                 325 
                 500 
                 167 
                 23.2 
                 25 
                 9.8 
                 36.6 
               
               
                   
                 330 
                 1000 
                 165 
                 11.3 
                 65 
                 4.2 
                 33.2 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     When spinning polyester threads, it proved to be of advantage to withdraw the threads after they had burst through an injector channel which was situated a good 1 metre lower, as described in L. Gerking, Change in Filament Properties of Polymer and in the Spinning Line, Chemical Fibres/Textile Industry 43/95 (1993) on pages 874/875. By repeated heating in between, as described in DE 19 65 054 column 4, lines 44 to 57, the tensile strength of the threads could be increased with both measures but primarily the shrinkage was able to be significantly reduced. 
     The polymer polylactide produced from natural raw materials showed in splitting spinning for coarser threads the values reproduced in table 3. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Thread results polylactide (PLA) 
               
               
                 MF (melt flow index) 22 at 210° C. and 2.16 kg 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 m o   
                 T S   
                 Δp k   
                 T L   
                 d 50   
                 CV 
                 d min   
                 d max   
               
               
                 g/min 
                 ° C. 
                 mbar 
                 ° C. 
                 μm 
                 % 
                 μm 
                 μm 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                 5.2 
                 253 
                 352 
                 35 
                 26.6 
                 19 
                 13.5 
                 33.9 
               
               
                   
                 254 
                 352 
                 35 
                 14.4 
                 37 
                 4.4 
                 27.7 
               
               
                   
                 254 
                 780 
                 44 
                 16.4 
                 56 
                 5.0 
                 48.3 
               
               
                 7.6 
                 284 
                 507 
                 52 
                  6.5 
                 43 
                 2.0 
                 11.1 
               
               
                 9.0 
                 255 
                 807 
                 56 
                 14.2 
                 46 
                 5.0 
                 28.7 
               
               
                   
                 254 
                 831 
                 60 
                   40.5 (1) 
                 18 
                 26.8 
                 50.1 
               
               
                   
                 245 
                 348 
                 60 
                 14.4 
                 75 
                 3.9 
                 44.3 
               
               
                 9.7 
                 277 
                 889 
                 64 
                  9.9 
                 59 
                 3.7 
                 29.3 
               
               
                 10.1 
                 253 
                 915 
                 90 
                   24.1 (2) 
                 45 
                 5.4 
                 42.8 
               
               
                 13.3 
                 285 
                 185 
                 47 
                  7.8 
                 40 
                 1.22 
                 15.0 
               
               
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     In Table 3, the value characterised with (1) emerges from the otherwise detectable dependencies, also as the greatest value. In this adjustment, the aerodynamic ratios were changed by changing the Laval nozzle geometry, likewise with the value characterised with (2). In the case of (1), absolutely no splitting of the melt thread took place, at (2) now and again. 
     The device according to the invention can be used for thread-forming melts or solutions but also in general for liquids if it is a question for example of applying thin layers, such as colours, paints, finishers. It then serves for atomising the liquids into as fine as possible droplets with as uniform as possible a distribution on the surface to be coated. The conditions can be found easily respectively by the given geometric adjustment possibilities of the device. 
     The devices (according to  FIG. 1 ,  2  or  3 ,  4 ) have in addition the advantage that a melt or a solution can be distributed more easily uniformly to individual outflow openings—here spinning nipples  23 —than if this takes place from a film, as normally with lines of nozzles. The nonwoven which is produced is more uniform stripes and in particular does not have the lines, also termed “lanes”, of a different weight in the direction of travel.