Patent Publication Number: US-10788840-B2

Title: Information processing apparatus, information processing method, and recording medium

Description:
BACKGROUND 
     1. Technical Field 
     The present disclosure relates to an information processing apparatus, an information processing method, and a recording medium. 
     2. Description of the Related Art 
     At places such as intersections where the view from a driver of a vehicle is obstructed or restricted, traffic accidents such as minor and major collisions with another vehicle or a pedestrian, for example, are likely to occur. Therefore, there are expectations for the development of a technology for predicting a potential hazard that can result in traffic accidents at places such as intersections to successfully prevent the traffic accidents from occurring. 
     For example, Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2007-193577 discloses a technique that helps drivers drive vehicles more safely by using data recorded by driving recorders. According to Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2007-193577, a driving recorder records data representing a driving situation of a vehicle when an unusual event occurs. If it is predicted that the same driving situation as that indicated by the data recorded by the driving recorder is likely to occur, a warning is given to the driver. Since the technique can increase the safety in this way, the technique allows vehicles to travel more safely. 
     In such a method for predicting a potential hazard by directly using data recorded by driving recorders, however, it is sometimes difficult to record a sufficient amount of data indicating the driving situation of an unusual event because such an unusual event that can result in a “hiyari-hatto” (hazardous) situation occurs in a short period of time. Consequently, it is difficult to predict the occurrence of the same driving situation and, by extension, a potential hazard that can result in a traffic accident. In other words, with the technique according to the related art, it is difficult to predict a potential hazard that can result in a traffic accident and to provide driving assist such as controlling a vehicle or warning a driver. Since the recording conditions become worse, for example, the recordable area becomes narrower, especially at places where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted, data recorded by driving recorders is apt to be insufficient. 
     SUMMARY 
     One non-limiting and exemplary embodiment provides an information processing apparatus and the like capable of assisting safe driving of vehicles at places such as intersections where the view from the vehicles is obstructed or restricted. 
     In one general aspect, the techniques disclosed here feature an apparatus including a processor and a memory storing thereon a computer program, which when executed by the processor, causes the processor to perform operations including: detecting, by using an image captured by an image capturing apparatus mounted in a vehicle, a traffic mirror in the image and an object in the traffic mirror; calculating a position of the object in the traffic mirror; generating driving assist information by using the position of the object in the traffic mirror; and outputting the driving assist information. 
     According to aspects of the present disclosure, an information processing apparatus and the like capable of assisting safe driving of vehicles at places such as intersections where the view from the vehicles is obstructed or restricted are successfully implemented. 
     It should be noted that general or specific embodiments may be implemented as a system, a method, an integrated circuit, a computer program, a computer-readable recording medium such as a Compact Disc-Read Only Memory (CD-ROM), or any selective combination thereof. 
     Additional benefits and advantages of the disclosed embodiments will become apparent from the specification and drawings. The benefits and/or advantages may be individually obtained by the various embodiments and features of the specification and drawings, which need not all be provided in order to obtain one or more of such benefits and/or advantages. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         FIG. 1  is a block diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a system in accordance with a first embodiment; 
         FIG. 2  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of an image obtaining unit in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 3  is a diagram illustrating an example of how the image obtaining unit is mounted in a vehicle in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 4  is an explanatory diagram of an example of an image obtained by the image obtaining unit in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 5  is an explanatory diagram of traffic mirror detection based on simple circle or quadrangle detection; 
         FIG. 6  is an explanatory diagram of traffic mirror detection based on statistical image recognition; 
         FIG. 7  is an explanatory diagram of a deep-learning-based recognition method of a moving object reflected in the traffic mirror; 
         FIG. 8  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of a calculating unit in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 9  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a calculation process performed by the calculating unit in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 10  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a blind spot determination process performed by a blind spot determining unit in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 11  is an explanatory diagram of blind spots of traffic mirrors; 
         FIG. 12  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of an output processing unit in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 13  is a conceptual diagram illustrating an amount of change in size of an object illustrated in  FIG. 9( b ) ; 
         FIG. 14  is a diagram illustrating an example of a circular-curve road assumed in the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 15  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of an output process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 16  is a diagram illustrating an example of a T-intersection assumed in the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 17  is an explanatory diagram illustrating another example of the output process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 18  is a flowchart illustrating an outline of an information processing method performed by the system in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 19  is a flowchart illustrating details of the information processing method performed by the system in accordance with the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 20  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with a first modification of the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 21  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with the first modification of the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 22  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with a second modification of the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 23  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with the second modification of the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 24  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with a third modification of the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 25  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with the third modification of the first embodiment; 
         FIG. 26  is a block diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a system in accordance with a second embodiment; 
         FIG. 27A  is a diagram illustrating an example of an object reflected in a traffic mirror visually recognized by a driver of a vehicle that is temporarily stationary at an intersection; 
         FIG. 27B  is an explanatory diagram of characteristics of a traffic mirror  FIG. 27C  is an explanatory diagram of characteristics of a traffic mirror; 
         FIG. 28  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of a calculating unit in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 29A  is a diagram illustrating an example of a position of an object calculated by an object position calculating unit illustrated in  FIG. 28 ; 
         FIG. 29B  is a diagram illustrating an example of a road area calculated by a road area calculating unit illustrated in  FIG. 28 ; 
         FIG. 30  is an explanatory diagram of a central axis calculation method used by a central axis calculating unit illustrated in  FIG. 28 ; 
         FIG. 31  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of an output processing unit in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 32  is a diagram illustrating an example of a position of an object in a traffic mirror in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 33  is an explanatory diagram describing the significance of a potential hazard in the case where an object is located on the distal side in a traffic mirror in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 34  is an explanatory diagram describing the significance of a potential hazard in the case where the object is located on the distal side in the traffic mirror in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 35  is an explanatory diagram describing the significance of a potential hazard in the case where the object is located on the distal side in the traffic mirror in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 36  is an explanatory diagram describing the significance of a potential hazard in the case where the object is located on the proximal side in the traffic mirror in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 37  is an explanatory diagram describing the significance of a potential hazard in the case where the object is located on the proximal side in the traffic mirror in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 38  is an explanatory diagram describing the significance of a potential hazard in the case where the object is located on the proximal side in the traffic mirror in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 39  is a diagram illustrating an example of a T-intersection assumed in the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 40  is an explanatory diagram illustrating another example of an output process performed by an output processing unit in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 41  is a flowchart illustrating an outline of an information processing method performed by the system in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 42  is a flowchart illustrating details of the information processing method performed by the system in accordance with the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 43  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with a first modification of the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 44  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with a second modification of the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 45  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with a third modification of the second embodiment; 
         FIG. 46  is a block diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a system in accordance with a third embodiment; 
         FIG. 47  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of a determining unit in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 48  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a dynamic map; 
         FIG. 49A  illustrates an example of an environment near a traffic mirror contained in an image in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 49B  illustrates an example of an environment near the traffic mirror contained in an image in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 49C  illustrates an example of an environment near the traffic mirror contained in an image in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 49D  illustrates an example of an environment near the traffic mirror contained in an image in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 49E  illustrates an example of an environment near the traffic mirror contained in an image in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 50  is a diagram illustrating an example of a map used by an installed position obtaining unit in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 51  is a diagram illustrating an example of a local dynamic map used by a first hazard significance determining unit in determination in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 52  is a diagram illustrating an example of a local dynamic map used by the first hazard significance determining unit in determination in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 53  is a diagram illustrating an example of a local dynamic map used by the first hazard significance determining unit in determination in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 54  is a diagram illustrating an example of a local dynamic map used by the first hazard significance determining unit in determination in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 55  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of an output processing unit in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 56  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of an output process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 57  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the output process performed by the output processing unit in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 58  is a flowchart illustrating an outline of an information processing method performed by a system in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 59  is a flowchart illustrating details of the information processing method performed by the system in accordance with the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 60  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a second hazard significance determination process performed by a second hazard significance determining unit in accordance with a first modification of the third embodiment; 
         FIG. 61  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the second hazard significance determination process performed by the second hazard significance determining unit in accordance with a second modification of the third embodiment; and 
         FIG. 62  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the second hazard significance determination process performed by the second hazard significance determining unit in accordance with a third modification of the third embodiment. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
     An apparatus according to an aspect of the present disclosure includes a processor and a memory storing thereon a computer program, which when executed by the processor, causes the processor to perform operations including detecting, by using an image captured by an image capturing apparatus mounted in a vehicle, a traffic mirror in the image and an object in the traffic mirror; calculating a position of the object in the traffic mirror; generating driving assist information by using the position of the object in the traffic mirror; and outputting the driving assist information. 
     With such a configuration, driving assist information for a vehicle is successfully output by using a traffic mirror at places such as intersections where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted. Thus, the apparatus can assist safe driving of the vehicle. 
     For example, in the generating, the driving assist information may be generated by using a positional relationship between the position of the object and an area in the traffic mirror determined from a road contained in the image. 
     In addition, for example, the calculating may include calculating the position of the object in the traffic mirror, calculating a road area in the traffic mirror, and calculating a central axis of the calculated road area, and, in the generating, the driving assist information may be generated by using a positional relationship between the position of the object and the central axis. 
     In addition, for example, in the generating, the driving assist information for causing the vehicle to avoid the object may be generated if the object is located above the central axis in the image. 
     Such a configuration enables a vehicle to avoid an object when the object is located near the vehicle and successfully ensures the safety of the object and the vehicle. 
     In addition, for example, in the generating, the driving assist information may be generated by using a positional relationship between the position of the object and a central line of the traffic mirror. 
     In addition, for example, in the generating, the driving assist information for causing the vehicle to avoid the object may be generated (i) if the object is located on a right side of the central line in the image in a case where the traffic mirror is directed toward left when viewed from the vehicle or (ii) if the object is located on a left side of the central line in the image in a case where the traffic mirror is directed toward right when viewed from the vehicle. 
     Such a configuration enables a vehicle to avoid an object when the object is located near the vehicle and successfully ensures the safety of the object and the vehicle. In addition, since complex processing such as identifying the central axis of the road can be omitted, the processing speed is successfully increased. 
     In addition, for example, the driving assist information may be output in accordance with a potential hazard predicted, from the position of the object in the traffic mirror, if the vehicle travels in a direction to be closer to the traffic mirror. 
     In addition, for example, the calculating may further include calculating a size of the object relative to the traffic mirror, and in the generating, the driving assist information may be generated by using the position of the object in the traffic mirror and the size of the object. 
     For example, in the generating, the driving assist information may be generated by using change information regarding a change in the size of the object in at least two consecutive time-series images and the position of the object in the traffic mirror. 
     In addition, for example, the driving assist information may include control command information regarding a behavior of the vehicle. 
     In addition, for example, the driving assist information may include indication information to be provided to an occupant of the vehicle. 
     In addition, for example, the operations may further include recognizing the object reflected in the traffic mirror. 
     In addition, for example, in the generating, the driving assist information may be generated by using an attribute of the object. 
     In addition, for example, in the generating, if the attribute of the object indicates a person, the driving assist information may be generated depending on information regarding an age of the object. 
     In addition, for example, in the generating, if the attribute of the object indicates a person, the driving assist information may be generated depending on whether or not the object is behaving carelessly. 
     In addition, for example, in the generating, the driving assist information may be generated if the object recognized in at least one image among a plurality of consecutive time-series images is not recognized in an image subsequent to the at least one image in time series. 
     In addition, for example, in the generating, the driving assist information may be generated based on the position of the object in the at least one image and non-recognition of the object in the subsequent image. 
     A method according to an aspect of the present disclosure includes detecting, based on an image captured by an image capturing apparatus mounted in a vehicle, a traffic mirror in the image and an object in the traffic mirror; calculating a position of the object in the detected traffic mirror; generating driving assist information by using the calculated position of the object in the traffic mirror; and outputting the generated driving assist information. 
     A non-transitory recording medium, according to an aspect of the present disclosure, stores thereon a computer program, which when executed by a processor, causes the processor to perform operations including detecting, by using an image captured by an image capturing apparatus mounted in a vehicle, a traffic mirror in the image and an object in the traffic mirror; calculating a position of the object in the detected traffic mirror; generating driving assist information by using the calculated position of the object in the traffic mirror; and outputting the generated driving assist information. 
     Embodiments of the present disclosure will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings. 
     Each embodiment described below merely provides a specific example of the present disclosure. The values, shapes, components, steps, the order of steps, etc., described in the following embodiments are merely illustrative and are not intended to limit the present disclosure. Among the components in the following embodiments, a component not recited in any of the independent claims indicating the most generic concept is described as an optional component. In addition, a configuration of each embodiment may be combined with configuration(s) of other embodiments. 
     First Embodiment 
     Configuration of System  1   
       FIG. 1  is a block diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a system  1  in accordance with a first embodiment. 
     The system  1  illustrated in  FIG. 1  is mounted in a vehicle, for example, an automobile and outputs driving assist information for the vehicle. The system  1  includes an information processing apparatus  10 , an image obtaining unit  11 , and a detection processing unit  12   a . Details of configurations of these components will be described below. Note that the configuration of the system  1  is not limited to the one illustrated in  FIG. 1 , and the image obtaining unit  11  and the detection processing unit  12   a  may be included in the information processing apparatus  10 . 
     Traffic mirrors are often installed at places where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted. For example, traffic mirrors are convex mirrors that are installed, as safety confirmation aids, on the road so that drivers can see the scenery that is directly invisible to the drivers at intersections where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted or blind corners where the view ahead is difficult to see. The information processing apparatus  10  assists safer driving of the vehicle by using traffic mirrors. Note that traffic mirrors used in the following description include circular or quadrangular physical mirrors. Traffic mirrors may include circular or quadrangular electronic mirrors that display an image of the directly invisible scenery. 
     Image Obtaining Unit  11   
       FIG. 2  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of the image obtaining unit  11  according to the first embodiment.  FIG. 3  is a diagram illustrating an example of how the image obtaining unit  11  is mounted in a vehicle in accordance with the first embodiment.  FIG. 4  is an explanatory diagram of an example of an image obtained by the image obtaining unit  11  in accordance with the first embodiment. 
     The image obtaining unit  11  obtains image information representing an image captured by an image capturing apparatus mounted in the vehicle. In the first embodiment, the image obtaining unit  11  includes a sensing unit  111  and an image storage unit  112  as illustrated in  FIG. 2 . The image obtaining unit  11  is, for example, an on-board camera as illustrated in  FIG. 3  and is mounted in a vehicle. 
     The sensing unit  111  captures consecutive time-series images of the scenery ahead of the traveling vehicle and stores the images in the image storage unit  112 . In the first embodiment, the sensing unit  111  is a video image recording apparatus, such as a camera. The sensing unit  111  may include a visible-light camera that captures images based on visible light and an indium gallium arsenide (InGaAs) camera that captures images based on infrared radiation. In this case, the sensing unit  111  may capture images based on visible light at daytime and capture images based on infrared radiation at nighttime. 
     The image storage unit  112  includes a hard disk drive (HDD) or a memory, for example. The image storage unit  112  stores images captured by the sensing unit  111 . 
     A case where an image of the scenery ahead of the traveling vehicle that is captured by the sensing unit  111  at a place such as an intersection where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or limited contains an image of a traffic mirror  51  as in an image  50  illustrated in  FIG. 4 , for example, will be described as an example. 
     Detection Processing Unit  12   a    
     The detection processing unit  12   a  detects, on the basis of image information representing an image captured by the image capturing apparatus mounted in the vehicle, a traffic mirror contained in the image and an object reflected in the traffic mirror. The detection processing unit  12   a  may further recognize an attribute of the object reflected in the traffic mirror. In the first embodiment, the detection processing unit  12   a  includes a detecting unit  12  and a recognizing unit  13 . 
     Detecting Unit  12   
     On the basis of image information representing an image captured by the image capturing apparatus mounted in the vehicle, the detecting unit  12  detects a traffic mirror contained in the image. More specifically, the detecting unit  12  detects a traffic mirror contained in an image that is obtained as a result of continuously capturing images of the scenery ahead of the traveling vehicle in time series. Note that the scenery subjected to image capturing may be other than the scenery ahead of the vehicle. For example, when the vehicle travels backward, the scenery subjected to image capturing may be the scenery behind the vehicle. 
     In the first embodiment, the detecting unit  12  detects the traffic mirror  51  contained in the image  50  illustrated in  FIG. 4  obtained by the image obtaining unit  11 , for example. Examples of a method for detecting a traffic mirror in an image include a method based on simple circle or quadrangle detection and a method based on statistical image recognition. The method for detecting a traffic mirror in an image will be described below with reference to the drawings. 
       FIG. 5  is an explanatory diagram of traffic mirror detection based on simple circle or quadrangle detection. Note that components that are the same or substantially the same as those illustrated in  FIG. 4  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof. 
     The detecting unit  12  first performs edge detection on the image  50  obtained by the image obtaining unit  11  and illustrated in  FIG. 5 , for example. Consequently, the detecting unit  12  detects an edge  51   a  corresponding to the shape of a traffic mirror as indicated in an image  50   a.    
     Then, the detecting unit  12  performs an edge similarity search in the image  50   a  in which the edge  51   a  has been detected. More specifically, the detecting unit  12  performs a scan using a filter (mirror shape filter  52 ) for detecting a shape such as a circle or a quadrangle in the image  50   a  to search for an edge that is similar to the mirror shape filter  52 . Note that the mirror shape filter  52  is a filter for detecting the outline of a traffic mirror. For example, a Sobel filter or a Canny filter can be used as the mirror shape filter  52 . 
     The detecting unit  12  then creates a similarity map  54 , for example, and detects, as the traffic mirror  51 , a circle at a position  53  having the high similarity in the similarity map  54 . 
     If the position, in the similarity map, of the subject contained in the image obtained by the image obtaining unit  11  is known, a filter for detecting a shape such as a circle or a quadrangle may be selectively used on the basis of information regarding the shape of the traffic mirror that can be estimated from the position. 
       FIG. 6  is an explanatory diagram of traffic mirror detection based on statistical image recognition. Note that the components that are the same or substantially the same as those illustrated in  FIG. 4  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof. 
     For example, the detecting unit  12  performs a scan using a matching area  52   a  containing circles of different sizes in the image  50  obtained by the image obtaining unit  11  and illustrated in  FIG. 6( a ) , for example. 
     As a result, the detecting unit  12  creates a similarity map  54   a  representing, based on each position in the image  50  and the size of each circle at the position, a similarity with the circle as illustrated in  FIG. 6( b ) . 
     Then, the detecting unit  12  detects, as the traffic mirror  51 , a circle at a position  53   a  having the high similarity in the similarity map  54   a.    
     Note that statistical image recognition is not limited to the case described with reference to  FIG. 6 . The detecting unit  12  may include a classifier (based on deep learning, support vector machine, or the like) that has performed learning by using numeral traffic-mirror images and non-traffic-mirror images. In this case, the detecting unit  12  may determine, at each position in the image  50 , whether an image at the position is a traffic-mirror image by using this classifier to detect the traffic mirror  51 . 
     Recognizing Unit  13   
     The recognizing unit  13  recognizes an object reflected in the traffic mirror on the basis of image information representing an image captured by the image capturing apparatus mounted in the vehicle. More specifically, the recognizing unit  13  recognizes an object reflected in the traffic mirror contained in the image obtained by the image obtaining unit  11 . The recognizing unit  13  may recognize an attribute of the object reflected in the traffic mirror. 
     In the first embodiment, the recognizing unit  13  recognizes a position and a size of an object such as a person, a bicycle, or an automobile that moves (hereinafter, referred to as a moving object) in the traffic mirror detected by the detecting unit  12  in an image. Examples of a method for recognizing a moving object in a traffic mirror contained in an image include a method based on machine learning, such as deep learning, for example. A method for recognizing a moving object in a traffic mirror contained in an image will be described below with reference to  FIG. 7 . 
       FIG. 7  is an explanatory diagram of a deep-learning-based recognition method for recognizing a moving object reflected in a traffic mirror.  FIGS. 7( a ) and 7( b )  illustrate an example case where a person  60  is reflected in the traffic mirror  51 , that is, the person  60  is in the traffic mirror  51 . Note that the components that are the same or substantially the same as those illustrated in  FIG. 4  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof. 
     The recognizing unit  13  performs a recognition process to recognize the person  60  while changing the position and the size of the area of the traffic mirror  51  detected by the detecting unit  12  in the image  50  illustrated in  FIG. 7( a ) , for example, in a manner as illustrated in  FIG. 7( b ) , for example. 
     The recognizing unit  13  performs in advance learning for recognizing moving objects (i.e., a person, a bicycle, and an automobile) and other objects so that the recognizing unit  13  is able to perform the recognition process above. With such learning, the recognizing unit  13  successfully recognizes that a moving object is reflected in a traffic mirror if the reliability of an object recognized to be in the traffic mirror exceeds a threshold and the object has the largest size. In addition, upon recognizing that a moving object is reflected in a traffic mirror, the recognizing unit  13  outputs the position and the size of the moving object. The term “reliability” refers to a value indicating the likelihood of the recognition result being a shape or outline of a moving object such as a person, a bicycle, or an automobile. The recognizing unit  13  recognizes that no moving object is reflected in the traffic mirror if the reliability of the object recognized to be in the traffic mirror does not exceed the threshold. 
     Information Processing Apparatus  10   
     The information processing apparatus  10  according to the first embodiment will be described next. 
     The information processing apparatus  10  according to the first embodiment outputs driving assist information for the vehicle by using a traffic mirror. In the first embodiment, the information processing apparatus  10  includes a calculating unit  101 , an output processing unit  102 , and a blind spot determining unit  103  as illustrated in  FIG. 1 . Details of these components will be described below. 
     Calculating Unit  101   
     The calculating unit  101  calculates a difference between the size of the traffic mirror detected by the detection processing unit  12   a  and a reference size and calculates the size of the object by using the calculated difference. The difference includes a scaling ratio of the traffic mirror relative to the reference size. The size of the object is calculated by enlarging or reducing the object reflected in the traffic mirror in accordance with the difference. 
       FIG. 8  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of the calculating unit  101  according to the first embodiment. 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 8 , the calculating unit  101  according to the first embodiment includes a difference calculating unit  1011  and an object size calculating unit  1012 . 
     The difference calculating unit  1011  calculates a difference between the size of the traffic mirror detected by the detecting unit  12  and a reference size. More specifically, the difference calculating unit  1011  calculates a difference between the reference size and the size of the traffic mirror that is detected by the detecting unit  12  in an image obtained by continuously capturing images of the scenery ahead of a traveling vehicle in time series. In the first embodiment, the difference calculating unit  1011  calculates, for example, a scaling ratio of the size of the traffic mirror contained in the image obtained by image capturing relative to the reference size. The reference size is a size indicated by a height and a width of a predetermined traffic mirror. 
     Note that the reference size may be set to the largest size of the traffic mirror contained in a plurality of images captured in a predetermined period of time or the size of the traffic mirror contained in an image that is the immediately preceding frame of the frame of interest. In addition, the difference calculating unit  1011  may calculate, as the difference, an amount of change in size of the object, which is determined by enlarging or reducing the object reflected in the traffic mirror in accordance with the scaling ratio calculated from at least two consecutive time-series images. 
     In addition, the difference calculating unit  1011  may calculate the difference from a single image. Specifically, the reference size is a pre-stored value, and the difference calculating unit  1011  calculates the scaling ratio on the basis of the size of the traffic mirror contained in a single image and the stored reference size. Note that the reference size may be associated with a distance to the subject and may be corrected in accordance with a distance between the vehicle and the traffic mirror contained in the image. 
     The object size calculating unit  1012  calculates the size of an object by using the difference calculated by the difference calculating unit  1011 . More specifically, the object size calculating unit  1012  calculates the size of the object by using the object reflected in the traffic mirror recognized by the recognizing unit  13  and the difference calculated by the difference calculating unit  1011 . In the first embodiment, the object size calculating unit  1012  calculates the size of the object reflected in the traffic mirror by enlarging or reducing the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  in accordance with the difference calculated by the difference calculating unit  1011 . 
     An example of a calculation process performed by the calculating unit  101  thus configured is now described with reference to the accompanying drawing. 
       FIG. 9  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the calculation process performed by the calculating unit  101  according to the first embodiment. Note that components that are the same or substantially the same as those illustrated in  FIG. 4  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof. 
     Images  50   n ,  50   n+1 , and  50   n+2  illustrated in  FIG. 9( a )  are consecutive time-series images of the scenery ahead of a traveling vehicle that are captured at time points t n , t n+1 , and t n+2 , respectively. The images  50   n ,  50   n+1 , and  50   n+2  respectively contain traffic mirrors  51 ,  51   n+1 , and  51   n+2 , and persons  60 ,  60   n+1 , and  60   n+2  are reflected respectively in the traffic mirrors  51 ,  51   n+1 , and  51   n+2 . Sizes of the traffic mirrors  51 ,  51   n+1 , and  51   n+2  are represented by the width and the height and are, for example, (w a , h 1a ), (w 1b , h 1b ), and (w 1c , h 1c ), respectively. The detecting unit  12  detects the sizes of the traffic mirrors  51 ,  51   n+1 , and  51   n+2 .  FIG. 9( b )  illustrates traffic mirrors  51 ′,  51 ′ n+1 , and  51 ′ n+2 , which are enlarged to the reference size. 
     In this case, the difference calculating unit  1011  of the calculating unit  101  calculates scaling ratios in the cases where the traffic mirrors  51 ,  51   n+1 , and  51   n+2  contained in the images  50   n ,  50   n+1 , and  50   n+2  are enlarged or reduced to the reference size, respectively. In the case where the reference size is set to (w s , h s ), for example, the difference calculating unit  1011  calculates scaling ratios to be w s /w 1a , w s /w 1b , and w s /w 1c  when the traffic mirrors  51 ,  51   n+1 , and  51   n+2  are enlarged or reduced to the reference size, respectively. Alternatively, the difference calculating unit  1011  may calculate the scaling ratios to be h s /h 1a , h s /h 1b , and h s /h 1c . 
     Then, the calculating unit  101 , specifically, the object size calculating unit  1012 , calculates the sizes of persons  60 ′,  60 ′ n+1 , and  60 ′ n+2  in the case where the traffic mirrors  51 ,  51   n+1 , and  51   n+2  and the persons  60 ,  60   n+1 , and  60   n+2  are enlarged in accordance with the scaling ratios w s /w 1a , w s /w 1b , and w s /w 1c  calculated by the difference calculating unit  1011  as illustrated in  FIG. 9( b ) . 
     Blind Spot Determining Unit  103   
     In the case where an object that is detected (recognized) by the detection processing unit  12   a  in at least one image among a plurality of consecutive time-series images is not detected (recognized) by the detection processing unit  12   a  in an image subsequent to the at least one image, the blind spot determining unit  103  determines that the subsequent image is a blind spot image in which the object may be present at a blind spot of the traffic mirror. In other words, the blind spot determining unit  103  determines whether a moving object that has been seen in the traffic mirror is no longer seen therein in the consecutive time-series images and determines that the image in which the moving object is no longer seen is a blind spot image. 
     An example of a blind spot determination process performed by the blind spot determining unit  103  thus configured will be described with reference to a drawing. 
       FIG. 10  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the blind spot determination process performed by the blind spot determining unit  103  in accordance with the first embodiment. Note that components that are the same or substantially the same as those illustrated in  FIG. 4  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof. 
     Images  50   m ,  50   m+1 , and  50   m+2  illustrated in  FIG. 10  are obtained by continuously capturing images of the scenery ahead of the traveling vehicle in time series at time points t m , t m+1 , and t m+2 , respectively. The images  50   m ,  50   m+1 , and  50   m+2  respectively contain traffic mirrors  51   m ,  51   m+1 , and  51   m+2 , and persons  60   m  and  60   m+1  are reflected respectively in the traffic mirrors  51   m  and  51   m+1 . 
     In this case, the persons  60   m  and  60   m+1  recognized by the recognizing unit  13  are reflected in the traffic mirrors  51   m  and  51   m+1  contained in the consecutive time-series images  50   m  and  50   m+1 , respectively. In contrast, no person is reflected in the traffic mirror  51   m+2  contained in the image  50   m+2  following the image  50   m+1 , and thus no person is recognized. Therefore, the blind spot determining unit  103  determines that the image  50   m+2  is a blind spot image. A reason why the blind spot determining unit  103  is able to determine a blind spot image in this way will be described with reference to  FIG. 11 . 
       FIG. 11  is an explanatory diagram of blind spots of traffic mirrors. 
     Traffic mirrors have angles of view and thus have blind spots, that is, blind spot areas. For example,  FIG. 11  illustrates an example case where a moving object  61   m+1 , which is a person riding a bicycle, moves to a position of a moving object  61   m+2  and enters the blind spot area of a traffic mirror  72  while a vehicle  2  is temporarily stationary at an intersection. In this case, the driver of the vehicle  2  that is temporarily stationary is able to recognize the moving object  61   m+1  reflected in the traffic mirror  72  but is not able to recognize the moving object  61   m+2  in the traffic mirror  72 . The moving object  61   m+2  is present even though the moving object  61   m+2  is not reflected in the traffic mirror  72 . Thus, the blind spot determining unit  103  performs a determination process as described above and determines that the image  50   m+2  is a blind spot image in which a moving object which is a person may be present at a blind spot of the traffic mirror  51   m+2 . 
     If the blind spot determining unit  103  determines a blind spot image, the output processing unit  102  generates and outputs vehicle control information for causing the vehicle to be temporarily stationary until the person becomes visible directly from the vehicle or is seen in the traffic mirror. In addition, in the case where the person is not seen in the traffic mirror even after a predetermined period passes since the blind spot determining unit  103  has determined the blind spot image, the blind spot determining unit  103  may determine that timeout has occurred and may perform the blind spot determination process from the start. In the case where a moving object such as a person does not become visible in the traffic mirror even after a predetermined period of time, the moving object such as a person present in a blind spot area of the traffic mirror may have entered a house or a store and, as a result, the moving object such as a person does not become visible even if the driver waited for a long time. Thus, it is determined that timeout has occurred in such a case. 
     Further, in the case where an object having different sizes are detected (recognized) by the detection processing unit  12   a  in at least two consecutive time-series images among a plurality of images and the object is not detected (recognized) by the detection processing unit  12   a  in an image subsequent to the at least two consecutive time-series images, the blind spot determining unit  103  may determine that the subsequent image is a blind spot image. A description about this case will be given with reference to  FIG. 10 , for example. The size of the person  60   m+1  reflected in the traffic mirror  51   m+1  contained in the image  50   m+1  is larger than the size of the person  60   m  reflected in the traffic mirror  51   m  contained in the image  50   m  that precedes the image  50   m+1  in time series. This indicates that the person  60  is approaching the intersection. The person is no longer in the traffic mirror  51   m+2  contained in the image  50   m+2  subsequent to the image  50   m+1  in time series. This indicates that the person  60  has entered the blind spot near the intersection. Thus, the blind spot determining unit  103  is able to determine that the image  50   m+2  is a blind spot image on the basis of the result of comparison between the size of the person  60   m+1  in the traffic mirror  51   m+1  contained in the image  50   m+1  and the size of the person  60   m  in the traffic mirror  51   m  contained in the preceding image  50   m  in time series and the presence or absence of the person  60  in the image  50   m+2 . With such a configuration, in the case where the person  60  moves away from the intersection to enter a blind spot, an image in which the person  60  is no longer reflected in the traffic mirror  51  is not determined to be a blind spot image. Thus, a circumstance in which the vehicle is caused to be stationary unnecessarily in a safe situation is successfully avoided. 
     Output Processing Unit  102   
     The output processing unit  102  generates driving assist information for a vehicle on the basis of the size of the object calculated by the calculating unit  101  and outputs the generated driving assist information. The driving assist information is generated in accordance with change information regarding a change in size of the object in at least two consecutive time-series images and is output. If the change information indicates an increase in the size, the driving assist information includes at least one of information for causing the vehicle to decelerate and information for causing the vehicle to move in a direction to be away from the object. In addition, if the change information indicates an increase in the size, the driving assist information includes information for causing the vehicle to start traveling after the object moves away from the vehicle. The driving assist information may be control command information regarding a behavior of the vehicle or indication information to be provided to an occupant of the vehicle. 
       FIG. 12  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the first embodiment. 
     In the first embodiment, the output processing unit  102  includes a hazard predicting unit  1031 , an information generating unit  1032 , and an information output unit  1033  as illustrated in  FIG. 12 . 
     The hazard predicting unit  1031  predicts a potential hazard anticipated if a vehicle travels without any precautions, on the basis of the size of the object calculated by the calculating unit  101 . The potential hazard may be the significance of a potential hazard or the type of a potential hazard (e.g., minor collision, major collision, or collision with a pedestrian or bicyclist when making a turn). The hazard predicting unit  1031  determines the significance of a potential hazard in accordance with an amount of change in the size of the object in at least two consecutive time-series images. The significance of a potential hazard is successfully predicted in accordance with, for example, an amount of change in the size of the object, which will be described. 
       FIG. 13  is a conceptual diagram illustrating an amount of change in the size of the object illustrated in  FIG. 9( b ) . Components that are the same or substantially the same as those illustrated in  FIG. 9( b )  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof.  FIG. 13  conceptually illustrates the persons  60 ′,  60 ′ n+1 , and  60 ′ n+2  which are objects reflected in the respective traffic mirrors enlarged or reduced to the reference size and which have the sizes calculated by the object size calculating unit  1012 . 
     The size of the person  60  that increases in an order of the person  60 ′, the person  60 ′ n+1 , and the person  60 ′ n+2  as illustrated in  FIG. 13  indicates that the person  60  is approaching the traffic mirror  51 , that is, the intersection. When the amount of change in the size between the persons  60 ′,  60 ′ n+1 , and  60 ′ n+2  is large, the speed at which the person  60  is approaching the traffic mirror  51  and an amount of change in the speed are large. Thus, the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is high. That is, when the amount of change in the size between the persons  60 ′,  60 ′ n+1 , and  60 ′ n+2  is large, it can be determined that the person  60  is rapidly approaching the intersection where the traffic mirror  51  is installed and the likelihood of the person  60  hitting or colliding with a vehicle having the information processing apparatus  10  mounted therein is high. In this way, the hazard predicting unit  1031  is able to predict the significance of a potential hazard in accordance with an amount of change in the size of an object. 
     The information generating unit  1032  generates driving assist information for the vehicle on the basis of the size of the object calculated by the calculating unit  101 . The information generating unit  1032  may generate driving assist information for the vehicle in accordance with the size of the object. For example, the information generating unit  1032  may generate driving assist information in accordance with change information regarding a change in the size of the object in at least two consecutive time-series images. In addition, the information generating unit  1032  may generate driving assist information for a vehicle on the basis of the state of the vehicle in addition to the size of the object. 
     In addition, the information generating unit  1032  may generate driving assist information in accordance with a potential hazard predicted from the change information regarding a change if the vehicle travels in a direction to be closer to the traffic mirror. The information generating unit  1032  may generate vehicle control information in accordance with a potential hazard predicted by the hazard predicting unit  1031 . 
     The information generating unit  1032  may generate, as driving assist information, information representing the significance of a potential hazard predicted by the hazard predicting unit  1031 . For example, the information generating unit  1032  may generate, as driving assist information, information representing the significance of a potential hazard determined by the hazard predicting unit  1031  in accordance with an amount of change in the size of an object in at least two consecutive time-series images. 
     In addition, the information generating unit  1032  may generate vehicle control information for causing a vehicle to temporarily stop on the basis of the determination result of a blind spot image obtained by the blind spot determining unit  103 . Specifically, the information generating unit  1032  may generate vehicle control information when an object detected (recognized) by the detection processing unit  12   a  in at least one image among a plurality of consecutive time-series images is not detected (recognized) by the detection processing unit  12   a  in an image subsequent to the at least one image in time series. In addition, the information generating unit  1032  may generate vehicle control information (driving assist information) when an object detected (recognized) in different sizes by the detection processing unit  12   a  in at least two consecutive time-series images among a plurality of images is not detected (recognized) by the detection processing unit  12   a  in an image subsequent to the at least two consecutive time-series images in time series. 
     The information output unit  1033  outputs the driving assist information generated by the information generating unit  1032 . 
     An example of an output process performed by the output processing unit  102  thus configured will be described below with reference to the drawings. 
       FIG. 14  is a diagram illustrating an example of a circular-curve road in accordance with the first embodiment.  FIG. 15  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of an output process performed by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the first embodiment. 
     The circular-curve road illustrated in  FIG. 14  is an example of a place where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted.  FIG. 14  illustrates a circumstance where the vehicle  2  having the information processing apparatus  10  or the system  1  according to the first embodiment mounted therein travels along the circular-curve road.  FIG. 14  also illustrates a vehicle  3 , which is an example of object, and the vehicle  3  in a traffic mirror  73  is visible from the vehicle  2 . 
     In this case, the output processing unit  102 , specifically, the hazard predicting unit  1031 , determines the significance of a potential hazard in accordance with a change in the size of the object reflected in the traffic mirror that is enlarged or reduced to (i.e., normalized based on) the reference size by the calculating unit  101 . 
     More specifically, the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is low when the size of the object reflected in the traffic mirror having the normalized size decreases or does not substantially change as illustrated in  FIG. 15 . In this case, the output processing unit  102 , specifically, the information generating unit  1032 , may generate information indicating that the significance of a potential hazard determined by the hazard predicting unit  1031  is low. In addition, the information generating unit  1032  may generate vehicle control information indicating that there is no change in control in terms of the speed of the vehicle  2  or the like in accordance with the low significance of a potential hazard as illustrated in  FIG. 15 . Since it can be determined that the vehicle  3  is traveling in a direction to be away from the vehicle  2  or is stationary when the size of the vehicle  3  in the traffic mirror  73  having the normalized size decreases or does not substantially change in the example illustrated in  FIG. 14 , the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is low. The information generating unit  1032  may generate information indicating that the determined significance of a potential hazard is low or vehicle control information indicating that there is no change in control in terms of the speed of the vehicle  2  or the like. 
     The hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is intermediate when the size of the object reflected in the traffic mirror having the normalized size gradually increases as illustrated in  FIG. 15 . In this case, the information generating unit  1032  may generate information indicating that the determined significance of a potential hazard is intermediate or may generate vehicle control information for causing the vehicle to decelerate on the basis of the intermediate significance of a potential hazard as illustrated in  FIG. 15 . Since it can be determined that the vehicle  3  is traveling in a direction to be closer to the vehicle  2  when the a change in the size of the vehicle  3  in the traffic mirror  72  having the normalized size is greater than a threshold a and the size of the vehicle  3  gradually increases in the example illustrated in  FIG. 14 , the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is intermediate. The information generating unit  1032  may generate information indicating that the determined significance of a potential hazard is intermediate or vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2  to decelerate. 
     The hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is high when the size of the object reflected in the traffic mirror having the normalized size suddenly increases as illustrated in  FIG. 15 . In this case, the information generating unit  1032  may generate information indicating that the determined significance of a potential hazard is high. The information generating unit  1032  may also generate vehicle control information for causing the vehicle to decelerate or for causing the vehicle to travel in a direction to be away from the object on the basis of the high significance of a potential hazard as illustrated in  FIG. 15 . Since it can be determined that the vehicle  3  is traveling at a high speed in a direction to be closer to the vehicle  2  when the change in the size of the vehicle  3  in the traffic mirror  73  having the normalized size is greater than a threshold b that is larger than the threshold a in the example illustrated in  FIG. 14 , the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is high. The information generating unit  1032  may generate information indicating that the determined significance of a potential hazard is high or vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2  to decelerate and for causing the vehicle  2  to travel in a direction to be away from the vehicle  3  so that the vehicle  2  is located at a position where no collision occurs even if the vehicle  3  deviates from the lane at the circular-curve road. 
     The case where the vehicle  2  is traveling (i.e., running) along the circular-curve road has been described with reference to  FIGS. 14 and 15 ; however, the case is not limited to this one. The same applies to the case where the vehicle  2  travels into an intersection of roads. 
       FIG. 16  is a diagram illustrating an example of a T-intersection assumed in the first embodiment.  FIG. 17  is an explanatory diagram illustrating another example of the output process performed by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the first embodiment. 
     The T-intersection illustrated in  FIG. 16  is an example of a place where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted.  FIG. 16  illustrates a circumstance where the vehicle  2  having the information processing apparatus  10  or the system  1  according to the first embodiment mounted therein is to enter a T-intersection.  FIG. 16  also illustrates the vehicle  3 , which is an example of an object, and the vehicle  3  reflected in a traffic mirror  74  is visible from the vehicle  2 . 
     In this case, the output processing unit  102 , specifically, the hazard predicting unit  1031 , determines that the significance of a potential hazard is low when the size of the object reflected in a traffic mirror having the normalized size decreases or substantially remains unchanged as illustrated in  FIG. 17 . In this case, the output processing unit  102 , specifically, the information generating unit  1032 , may generate information indicating that the significance of a potential hazard determined by the hazard predicting unit  1031  is low. In addition, the information generating unit  1032  may generate vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2  to be temporarily stationary and then start traveling on the basis of the low significance of a potential hazard as illustrated in  FIG. 17 . Since it can be determined that the vehicle  3  is traveling in a direction to be away from the vehicle  2  or is stationary when the size of the vehicle  3  reflected in the traffic mirror  74  having the normalized size decreases or substantially remains unchanged in the example illustrated in  FIG. 16 , the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is low. The information generating unit  1032  may generate information indicating that the determined significance of a potential hazard is low or vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2  to be temporarily stationary and then start traveling. 
     The hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is high when the size of the object reflected in the traffic mirror having the normalized size increases as illustrated in  FIG. 17 . In this case, the information generating unit  1032  may generate information indicating that the significance of a potential hazard determined by the hazard predicting unit  1031  is high. The information generating unit  1032  may generate vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2  to temporarily stop and then start traveling after passage of the vehicle  2 , which is the target, is confirmed using a sensor or the like, on the basis of the high significance of a potential hazard as illustrated in  FIG. 17 . Since it can be determined that the vehicle  3  is traveling in a direction to be closer to the vehicle  2  when the size of the vehicle  3  in the traffic mirror  74  having the normalized size increases in the example illustrated in  FIG. 16 , the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is high. The information generating unit  1032  may generate information indicating that the determined significance of a potential hazard is high or vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2  to be temporarily stationary and then start traveling after passage of the vehicle  2  is confirmed using a sensor or the like. 
     The example where the change information regarding a change in size is an amount of change in size has been described above; however, the change information regarding a change in size may be information indicating the type of the change. For example, the type of the change in the size may be an increase (or decrease) in the size or the size becoming greater than or equal to a predetermined size (or becoming less than the predetermined size). 
     In addition, the example where driving assist information is control command information has been described above; however, the driving assist information may be indication information. For example, the indication information may be information indicating a potential hazard (described later) or information indicating a recommended operation for the driver. 
     Operation of System  1   
     An information processing method performed by the system  1  thus configured will be described next.  FIG. 18  is a flowchart illustrating an outline of the information processing method performed by the system  1  in accordance with the first embodiment.  FIG. 19  is a flowchart illustrating details of the information processing method performed by the system  1  in accordance with the first embodiment. The same or substantially the same steps in  FIGS. 18 and 19  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof. 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 18 , the system  1  detects a traffic mirror contained in an image and an object reflected in the traffic mirror on the basis of image information (S 10 ). Then, the system  1  calculates a difference between the size of the traffic mirror contained in the image and a reference size and calculates the size of the object reflected in the traffic mirror by using the difference (S 11 ). Then, the system  1  generates driving assist information for a vehicle on the basis of the size of the object calculated in S 11  (S 12 ). Then, the system  1  outputs the driving assist information generated in S 12  (S 13 ). 
     More specifically, as illustrated in  FIG. 19 , the image obtaining unit  11  of the system  1  performs an image obtaining process to obtain image information representing images captured by an image capturing apparatus mounted in a traveling vehicle (S 101 ). 
     Then, the system  1  performs the process of S 10  described in  FIG. 18 . More specifically, in S 10 , the system  1  performs a detection process to detect a traffic mirror contained in each image represented by the image information obtained in S 101  (S 102 ). Then, the system  1  performs a recognition process to recognize (detect) an object reflected in the traffic mirror contained in the image represented by the image information obtained in S 101  (S 103 ). 
     Then, the system  1  performs the process of S 11  described in  FIG. 18 . More specifically, in S 11 , the system  1  performs a difference calculation process to calculate a difference between the size of the traffic mirror detected in S 102  and the reference size (S 104 ). Then, the system  1  performs an object size calculation process for the object recognized in the traffic mirror in S 103  to calculate the size of the object by using the difference calculated in S 104  (S 105 ). Since details of the processes performed in S 104  and S 105  are as described above, a detailed description thereof is omitted. 
     Then, the system  1  performs a blind spot determination process to determine, when an object recognized in S 103  in two consecutive time-series images among three consecutive time-series images is not recognized in S 103  in an image subsequent to the two consecutive time-series images, that the subsequent image is a blind spot image in which the object is possibly present in a blind spot of the traffic mirror (S 106 ). 
     Then, the system  1  determines whether the object is recognized in S 103  after the blind spot image is determined in S 106  or whether a predetermined period has passed from the determination of the blind spot image (S 106 ). When the object reappears in S 103  after the blind spot image is determined in S 106  or when timeout occurs, that is, when no object is recognized in S 103  over the predetermined period from the determination of the blind spot image in S 106  (Yes in S 107 ), the process proceeds to the subsequent step (S 12 ); otherwise (No in S 107 ), the determination process of S 107  is repeated. 
     Then, the system  1  performs the process of S 12  described in  FIG. 18 . More specifically, in S 12 , the system  1  performs a hazard prediction process to predict the significance of a potential hazard anticipated if the vehicle travels without any precautions, on the basis of the size of the object calculated in S 105  (S 108 ). Then, the system  1  performs an information generation process to generate, as driving assist information, information indicating the significance of a potential hazard determined in S 108  or generate vehicle control information for controlling the vehicle on the basis of the significance of a potential hazard determined in S 108  (S 109 ). Since details of the processes performed in S 108  and S 109  are described above, a detailed description thereof is omitted. 
     Then, the system  1  performs the process of S 13  described in  FIG. 18 . More specifically, in S 13 , the system  1  performs an information output process to output the driving assist information or the like generated in S 109  (S 110 ). 
     Note that the order in which the processes of S 103 , S 104 , and S 105  are performed is not limited to the order illustrated in  FIG. 19 . That is, the process of S 103  may be performed after the process of S 104 , and then the process of S 105  may be performed. In addition, the processes of S 106  and S 107  may be performed prior to the calculation process of S 11 . 
     Advantageous Effects of First Embodiment 
     As described above, the information processing apparatus  10  or the system  1  according to the first embodiment is able to determine the significance of a potential hazard by using a traffic mirror at a place such as an intersection where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted and is able to generate driving assist information for a vehicle on the basis of the determined significance of a potential hazard and output the driving assist information. Consequently, the information processing apparatus  10  or the system  1  according to the first embodiment is able to assist safe driving of a vehicle having the information processing apparatus  10  or the system  1  mounted therein. 
     Specifically, when an amount of movement of an object, such as a person, reflected in a traffic mirror is large at a place such as an intersection where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted, it is highly probable that the object suddenly comes out to the place. In such a case, the vehicle needs to be decelerated quickly to avoid a potential hazard. 
     Since the size of the traffic mirror contained in images captured from a traveling vehicle changes, normalization is performed to make the sizes of the traffic mirror uniform to a predetermined reference size in the first embodiment. Consequently, an amount of movement of an object, such as a person, reflected in the traffic mirror is successfully converted into an amount of change in the size of the object reflected in the traffic mirror. Thus, the significance of a potential hazard is successfully determined in accordance with the amount of change in the size. In this way, the information processing apparatus  10  according to the first embodiment is able to determine the significance of a possible hazard by using a traffic mirror. 
     For example, in the case where a vehicle in which automated driving is enabled includes the information processing apparatus  10 , since the vehicle is able to determine the significance of a potential hazard by using a traffic mirror in a manner as described above, the vehicle is able to perform control in accordance with the determined significance of a potential hazard. 
     In addition, the driving assist information may be generated in accordance with change information regarding a change in the size of the object in at least two consecutive time-series images, and the change information may indicate an increase in the size, as described above. In this case, the driving assist information may include at least one of information for causing the vehicle to decelerate and information for causing the vehicle to travel in a direction to be away from the object or may include information for causing the vehicle to start traveling after the object is away from the vehicle because of the following reason. With these pieces of information, the safety of the object and the vehicle that are approaching the intersection can be guaranteed. 
     In addition, the driving assist information may be generated on the basis of a state of the vehicle in addition to the size of the object because appropriate control can be implemented in accordance with the state of the vehicle (such as a traveling state or a stationary state). 
     In addition, the driving assist information may be generated in accordance with the size of the object because a potential hazard is successfully predicted without performing a process using the change information regarding a change in the size. 
     As described above, the information processing apparatus  10  or the system  1  according to the first embodiment is able to assist safe driving of a vehicle by using a traffic mirror at a place such as an intersection where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted. 
     First Modification 
     In the first embodiment, the description has been given of the case where the significance of a potential hazard is determined in accordance with an amount of change in the size of an object reflected in a traffic mirror having a normalized size; however, the criterion used is not limited to this one. The recognizing unit  13  may recognize an attribute of an object reflected in a traffic mirror, and the calculating unit  101  may determine the significance of a potential hazard by taking into account the attribute. In a first modification, a description will be given of the case where the significance of a potential hazard is determined by further taking into account an attribute regarding the moving speed of an object reflected in a traffic mirror. 
       FIGS. 20 and 21  are explanatory diagrams each illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the first modification of the first embodiment. In  FIGS. 20 and 21 , content that is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIGS. 15 and 17  is denoted by the same expression to omit a detailed description thereof. 
       FIG. 20  illustrates an example of the hazard prediction process performed for a circular-curve road by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the first modification.  FIG. 21  illustrates an example of the hazard prediction process performed for a T-intersection by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the first modification. Since the vehicle control information based on the low, intermediate, or high significance of a potential hazard may be the same as that illustrated in  FIGS. 15 and 17 , an illustration thereof is omitted in  FIGS. 20 and 21 . 
     As illustrated in  FIGS. 20 and 21 , in the case where an object is a person, the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines the significance of a potential hazard in the same manner as that in the cases illustrated in  FIGS. 15 and 17 , respectively. On the other hand, in the case where the object is a bicycle, a motor cycle, or an automobile having a higher moving speed than a person, the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is higher than that in the case where the object is a person in accordance with the moving speed. 
     As described above, in the first modification, the output processing unit  102  generates driving assist information in accordance with an attribute of an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  and outputs the generated driving assist information. 
     Second Modification 
     In the first modification, the description has been given of the case where the significance of a potential hazard is determined by further taking into account an attribute regarding the moving speed of an object reflected in a traffic mirror; however, the attribute used in determination is not limited to the attribute regarding the moving speed. In the case where an object reflected in a traffic mirror is a person, the hazard predicting unit  1031  may determine the significance of a potential hazard by further taking into an attribute regarding the age of the person. This case will be described below as a second modification. 
       FIGS. 22 and 23  are explanatory diagrams each illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the second modification of the first embodiment. In  FIGS. 22 and 23 , content that is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIGS. 15 and 17  is denoted by the same expression to omit a detailed description thereof. 
       FIG. 22  illustrates an example of the hazard prediction process performed for a circular-curve road by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the second modification.  FIG. 23  illustrates an example of the hazard prediction process performed for a T-intersection by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the second modification. Since the vehicle control information based on the low, intermediate, or high significance of a potential hazard may be the same as that illustrated in  FIGS. 15 and 17 , an illustration thereof is omitted also in  FIGS. 22 and 23 . 
     As illustrated in  FIGS. 22 and 23 , in the case where an object is a person and the person is a child or an elderly person, the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines the significance of a potential hazard in the same or substantially same manner as that in  FIGS. 15 and 17 , respectively. On the other hand, if the object is a person and the person is neither a child nor an elderly person, the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is higher than that in the case where the person is a child or an elderly person. 
     As described above, in the second modification, in the case where an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  is a person, the output processing unit  102  outputs driving assist information that changes depending on information regarding the age of the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13 . The example where the information regarding the age represents a generation of the person has been described above; however, the information regarding the age may represent the age or the age range of the person. 
     Third Modification 
     In the second modification, the description has been given of the case where, in the case where an object reflected in a traffic mirror is a person, the significance of a potential hazard is determined by further taking into account an attribute regarding the age of the person; however, the attribute used in determination is not limited to the attribute regarding the age. In the case where an object reflected in a traffic mirror is a person, the hazard predicting unit  1031  may determine the significance of a potential hazard by further taking into account whether or not the person is behaving carelessly. Specifically, a careless behavior indicates a behavior without looking ahead. Examples of a behavior without looking ahead include looking at a mobile terminal such as a smartphone or a book while moving. This case will be described below as a third modification. 
       FIGS. 24 and 25  are explanatory diagrams each illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the third modification of the first embodiment. In  FIGS. 24 and 25 , content that is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIGS. 15 and 17  is denoted by the same expression to omit a detailed description thereof. 
       FIG. 24  illustrates an example of the hazard prediction process performed for a circular-curve road by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the third modification.  FIG. 25  illustrates an example of the hazard prediction process performed for a T-intersection by the output processing unit  102  in accordance with the third modification. Since the vehicle control information based on the low, intermediate, or high significance of a potential hazard may be the same as that illustrated in  FIGS. 15 and 17 , an illustration thereof is omitted also in  FIGS. 24 and 25 . 
     As illustrated in  FIGS. 24 and 25 , in the case where an object is a person and the person does not take a behavior without looking ahead, which involves the person looking at a mobile terminal while moving, that is, the person is not looking at a mobile terminal while walking, the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines the significance of a potential hazard in the same manner as that in  FIGS. 15 and 17 . On the other hand, in the case where the object is a person and the person is taking a behavior without looking ahead, that is, the person is looking at a mobile terminal while walking, the hazard predicting unit  1031  determines that the significance of a potential hazard is higher than that in the case where the person is not taking a behavior without looking ahead. The example where the careless behavior is a behavior without looking ahead has been described above; however, the careless behavior may indicate the case where the person is looking ahead but looking above or below while moving or the case where the person is looking at a specific object, such as a baby buggy or a ball, located in front of the person while moving. 
     As described above, in the third modification, in the case where an attribute of an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  indicates a person, the output processing unit  102  generates and outputs driving assist information depending on whether the person recognized by the recognizing unit  13  is behaving carelessly. 
     Second Embodiment 
     In the first embodiment, the description has been given of the information processing apparatus  10  and the system  1  capable of assisting safe driving of a traveling vehicle by using a traffic mirror at a place such as an intersection where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted; however, the situation is not limited to this case. Safe driving of a vehicle that is temporarily stationary can be assisted by using a traffic mirror. This case will be described below as a second embodiment. 
     Configuration of System  1 A 
       FIG. 26  is a block diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a system  1 A in accordance with the second embodiment. Components that are the same or substantially the same as those illustrated in  FIG. 1  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof. 
     The system  1 A illustrated in  FIG. 26  differs from the system  1  according to the first embodiment in a configuration of an information processing apparatus  10 A. The system  1 A is mounted in a vehicle, for example, an automobile and is able to output driving assist information for the vehicle by using a traffic mirror, just like the system  1 . 
     In the second embodiment, the information processing apparatus  10 A takes into account the position of an object in a traffic mirror in order to assist safe driving of a vehicle that is temporarily stationary. As in the first embodiment, the image obtaining unit  11  and the detection processing unit  12   a  may be included in the information processing apparatus  10 A. 
     Information Processing Apparatus  10 A 
     The information processing apparatus  10 A according to the second embodiment outputs driving assist information for a vehicle that is temporarily stationary by using a traffic mirror. In the second embodiment, the information processing apparatus  10 A also takes into account the position of an object in a traffic mirror in order to assist safe driving of a vehicle that is temporarily stationary. The reason for this will be described with reference to  FIGS. 27A to 27C .  FIG. 27A  is diagram illustrating an example of an object  63  reflected in a traffic mirror  75  visually recognized by a driver of a vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary at an intersection.  FIGS. 27B and 27C  are explanatory diagrams describing characteristics of a traffic mirror. 
     For example,  FIG. 27A  illustrates an example case where, when the driver of the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary at an intersection looks at the traffic mirror  75  installed at the intersection, the driver can confirm a person riding a bicycle as the object  63  reflected in the traffic mirror  75 . In  FIG. 27A , since the object  63 , which is a person, is at a distal side in the traffic mirror, that is, in an upper portion of the traffic mirror  75 , it appears to the driver of the vehicle  2   a  that the object  63  is located on a distal side of the road distal to the vehicle  2   a  as illustrated in  FIG. 27B . However, due to the characteristics of traffic mirrors in which the left and the right are reversed, the object  63  is actually located at a position illustrated in  FIG. 27C , that is, at a proximal side of the road proximal to the vehicle  2   a.    
     Thus, the information processing apparatus  10 A according to the second embodiment also takes into account the position of the object in the traffic mirror and outputs driving assist information for the vehicle  2   a.    
     More specifically, the information processing apparatus  10 A according to the second embodiment includes a calculating unit  101 A, an output processing unit  102 A, and the blind spot determining unit  103  as illustrated in  FIG. 26 . The information processing apparatus  10 A illustrated in  FIG. 26  differs from the information processing apparatus  10  according to the first embodiment in the configurations of the calculating unit  101 A and the output processing unit  102 A. Details of the configurations of the calculating unit  101 A and the output processing unit  102 A will be described below. 
     Calculating Unit  101 A 
       FIG. 28  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of the calculating unit  101 A according to the second embodiment.  FIG. 29A  is a diagram illustrating an example of a position of an object calculated by an object position calculating unit  1013  illustrated in  FIG. 28 .  FIG. 29B  is a diagram illustrating an example of a road area calculated by a road area calculating unit  1015  illustrated in  FIG. 28 .  FIG. 30  is an explanatory diagram describing a central axis calculation method used by a central axis calculating unit  1016  illustrated in  FIG. 28 . 
     The calculating unit  101 A according to the second embodiment calculates the position of an object in a traffic mirror detected by the detection processing unit  12   a . More specifically, the calculating unit  101 A calculates the position, in a traffic mirror, of an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  in the traffic mirror detected by the detecting unit  12  in an image captured by an image capturing apparatus mounted in a vehicle. 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 28 , for example, the calculating unit  101 A includes the object position calculating unit  1013 , an object size calculating unit  1014 , the road area calculating unit  1015 , and the central axis calculating unit  1016 . Note that the calculating unit  101 A may include only the object position calculating unit  1013  or may include only the object position calculating unit  1013  and the object size calculating unit  1014 . 
     The object position calculating unit  1013  calculates the position of an object in a traffic mirror. More specifically, the object position calculating unit  1013  calculates the position, in a traffic mirror, of an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  in the traffic mirror detected by the detecting unit  12  in each image obtained by continuously capturing images of the scenery ahead of a temporarily stationary vehicle in time series. For example, the object position calculating unit  1013  calculates the position of the object  63 , which is a person riding a bicycle, in a area of the traffic mirror  75  as illustrated in  FIG. 29A . In the case where the calculating unit  101 A includes only the object position calculating unit  1013 , the object position calculating unit  1013  may determine whether the position of the object in the traffic mirror is on the right or on the left with respect to a threshold indicating a predetermined position in the traffic mirror. Alternatively, the object position calculating unit  1013  may determine whether the position of the object in the traffic mirror is above or below a threshold indicating a predetermined position in the traffic mirror. 
     The object size calculating unit  1014  calculates the size of the object relative to the traffic mirror. More specifically, the object size calculating unit  1014  calculates the size of the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  in the traffic mirror detected by the detecting unit  12  in an image obtained by continuously capturing images of the scenery ahead of a temporarily stationary vehicle in time series. 
     The road area calculating unit  1015  calculates a road area in the traffic mirror. More specifically, the road area calculating unit  1015  calculates a road area which is an area representing the road reflected in the traffic mirror detected by the detecting unit  12 . For example, the road area calculating unit  1015  calculates a road area  80  representing the road that is present in the area of the traffic mirror  75  as illustrated in  FIG. 29B . The road area calculating unit  1015  is able to calculate such a road area by performing in advance learning, for example, convolutional deep learning, by using numerous images of traffic mirrors that show roads therein. 
     The central axis calculating unit  1016  calculates a central axis of the road area calculated by the road area calculating unit  1015 . More specifically, the central axis calculating unit  1016  first calculates, by using Hough transform, a straight line (referred to as a road-shoulder line) that is equivalent to the shoulder of the road in the road area  80  calculated by the road area calculating unit  1015  as illustrated in  FIG. 30 , for example. Then, the central axis calculating unit  1016  calculates lines L 1  and L 2  that have an equal distance d from the end of the calculated road-shoulder line, pass a position on the road-shoulder line, and are perpendicular to the road-shoulder line. Likewise, the central axis calculating unit  1016  calculates lines L 3  and L 4  that have an equal distance from the end of the calculated road-shoulder line, pass a position on the road-shoulder line, and are perpendicular to the road-shoulder line and lines L 5  and L 6  that have an equal distance from the end of the calculated road-shoulder line, pass a position on the road-shoulder line, and are perpendicular to the road-shoulder line. Then, the central axis calculating unit  1016  calculates, as a central axis  82  of the road area, a line obtained by linking an intersection point of the lines L 1  and L 2 , an intersection point of the lines L 3  and L 4 , and an intersection point of the lines L 5  and L 6 . 
     The description has been given of the case where the central axis calculating unit  1016  calculates the central axis  82  by calculating the three sets of lines L 1  and L 2 , L 3  and L 4 , and L 5  and L 6  above; however, the calculation method is not limited to this one. Since the central axis  82  can be determined from an intersection point of at least two lines, the central axis calculating unit  1016  can calculate the central axis  82  from the intersection point of the calculated lines L 1  and L 2  and the end of the road-shoulder line. Alternatively, the central axis calculating unit  1016  may calculate four or more sets of lines and calculate, by using the least squares method, a line that minimizes the squared errors between the intersection points of the four or more sets of lines and the line, as the central axis  82 . 
     Output Processing Unit  102 A 
     The output processing unit  102 A generates driving assist information on the basis of the position of the object in the traffic mirror calculated by the calculating unit  101 A and outputs the generated driving assist information. The driving assist information may include control command information regarding a behavior of a vehicle or indication information to be provided to an occupant of the vehicle. 
       FIG. 31  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of the output processing unit  102 A in accordance with the second embodiment.  FIG. 32  is a diagram illustrating an example of the position of an object in a traffic mirror in accordance with the second embodiment. 
     In the second embodiment, the output processing unit  102 A includes a hazard predicting unit  1031 A, an information generating unit  1032 A, and an information output unit  1033 A as illustrated in  FIG. 31 . 
     Hazard Predicting Unit  1031 A 
     The hazard predicting unit  1031 A predicts a potential hazard on the basis of the position of the object in the traffic mirror calculated by the calculating unit  101 A. For example, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may predict a potential hazard from the position of the object in the traffic mirror in the case where a vehicle travels in a direction to be closer to the traffic mirror or may predict a potential hazard in accordance with a relationship between the position of the object and the area in the traffic mirror determined from the road contained in an image. 
     In the second embodiment, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A predicts a potential hazard on the basis of the position calculated by the object position calculating unit  1013  and the central axis calculated by the central axis calculating unit  1016 . Specifically, a potential hazard may be the significance of a potential hazard or the type of a potential hazard (e.g., minor collision, major collision, or collision with a pedestrian or bicyclist when making a turn). 
     If the position calculated by the object position calculating unit  1013  is on the right of the central axis calculated by the central axis calculating unit  1016 , the hazard predicting unit  1031 A determines that the significance of a potential hazard is higher than that in the case where the position is on the left of the central axis. For example, when the lower end of the object  63  is located on the right of or above the central axis  82  of the road area as illustrated in  FIG. 32 , it can be defined that the object  63  is present in the distal side in the area of the traffic mirror  75 . If the object  63  is present in the distal side in the area of the traffic mirror  75 , the object  63  is located on the proximal side of the road when viewed from the vehicle. Thus, when the vehicle that is temporarily stationary starts traveling, the vehicle may collide with the object  63 . For this reason, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A determines that the significance of a potential hazard is high when the object  63  is present on the distal side in the area of the traffic mirror  75 . On the other hand, if the object  63  is located on the left of or below the central axis  82 , it can be defined that the object is present in the proximal side in the area of the traffic mirror  75 . If the object  63  is present on the proximal side in the area of the traffic mirror  75 , the object  63  is located on the distal side of the road when viewed from the vehicle. Thus, even if the vehicle that is temporarily stationary starts traveling, the likelihood of the vehicle colliding with the object  63  is low. For this reason, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A can determine that the significance of a potential hazard is low when the object  63  is present on the proximal side in the area of the traffic mirror  75 . 
     These cases will be described more specifically below with reference to the drawings. 
       FIGS. 33, 34, and 35  are explanatory diagrams each describing the significance of a potential hazard in the case where an object  64  is present on the distal side in the traffic mirror  75  in accordance with the second embodiment.  FIG. 33  illustrates a circumstance where images of the traffic mirror  75  having the object  64  on the distal side are captured from the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary.  FIG. 34( a )  illustrates the position and the size of the object  64  in the traffic mirror  75 , and  FIG. 34( b )  corresponds to an enlarged view of the traffic mirror  75  and illustrates a relationship between the object  64  and the road.  FIG. 35  illustrates a positional relationship among the object  64 , the vehicle  2   a , and the traffic mirror  75  illustrated in  FIG. 34 . 
     It is assumed that the object  64 , which is a person, walks in a direction of the intersection on the proximal side of the road when viewed from the vehicle  2   a  as illustrated in  FIG. 35 . The system  1 A mounted in the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary captures images  50   j ,  50   j+1 , and  50   j+2  at time points t j , t j+1 , and t j+2 , respectively, as illustrated in  FIG. 34 . In this case, the system  1 A, specifically, the information processing apparatus  10 A calculates the positions of objects  64   j ,  64   j+1 , and  64   j+2  in the traffic mirror  75 . Since the objects  64   j ,  64   j+1 , and  64   j+2  are present on the distal side in the images  50   j ,  50   j+1 , and  50   j+2 , respectively, the objects  64   j ,  64   j+1 , and  64   j+2  are actually located on the proximal side of the road when viewed from the vehicle  2   a . That is, if the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary starts traveling, the vehicle  2   a  may collide with the object  64 . Thus, the significance of a potential hazard is determined to be high. 
     The system  1 A mounted in the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary may capture the images  50   j ,  50   j+1 , and  50   j+2  and may calculate the positions and the sizes of the object  64   j ,  64   j+1 , and  64   j+2 . In this case, the continuously increasing sizes of the objects  64   j ,  64   j+1 , and  64   j+2  indicates that the object  64  is approaching the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary at the intersection. Thus, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine that the significance of a potential hazard for the object  64   j+2  is higher than that for the object  64   j+1 . As described above, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine the significance of a potential hazard in accordance with an amount of change in the size of the object in at least two consecutive time-series images. That is, when the size of the object is calculated by the object size calculating unit  1014  with reference to the traffic mirror, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may predict the significance of a potential hazard on the basis of the position of the object in the traffic mirror calculated by the object position calculating unit  1013  and the size of the object calculated by the object size calculating unit  1014 . 
     In the case where the system  1 A mounted in the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary captures the images  50   j+2  and  50   j+3 , the object  64  is not in the traffic mirror  75  contained in the image  50   j+3 . However, because of the continuity which means that the object  64   j+2  is in the traffic mirror  75  contained in the image  50   j+2  captured at the time point t j+2  which is immediately before, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine that the image  50   j+3  is a blind spot image in which the object  64  may be present in a blind spot of the traffic mirror  75  and determine that the significance of a potential hazard for the image  50   j+3  is higher than that for the object  64   j+2 . 
       FIGS. 36, 37, and 38  are explanatory diagrams describing the significance of a potential hazard in the case where the object  64  is located in the proximal side in the traffic mirror  75  in accordance with the second embodiment.  FIG. 36  illustrates a circumstance where images of the traffic mirror  75  in which the object  64  is reflected on the proximal side are captured from the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary.  FIG. 37( a )  illustrates the position and the size of the object  64  in the traffic mirror  75 , and  FIG. 37( b )  corresponds to an enlarged view of the traffic mirror  75  and illustrates a relationship between the object  64  and a road.  FIG. 38  illustrates a positional relationship among the object  64 , the vehicle  2   a , and the traffic mirror  75  illustrated in  FIG. 37 . 
     It is assumed that the object  64 , which is a person, is walking in a direction of an intersection on the distal side of the road when viewed from the vehicle  2   a  as illustrated in  FIG. 38 . It is also assumed that the system  1 A mounted in the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary captures images  50   k ,  50   k+1 , and  50   k+2  at time points t k , t k+1 , and t k+2 , respectively, as illustrated in  FIG. 37( a ) . In this case, the system  1 A, specifically, the information processing apparatus  10 A calculates the positions of the objects  64   k ,  64   k+1 , and  64   k+2  in the traffic mirror  75 . Since the objects  64   k ,  64   k+1 , and  64   k+2  are present on the proximal side in the images  50   k ,  50   k+1 , and  50   k+2 , respectively, the objects  64   k ,  64   k+1 , and  64   k+2  are located on the distal side of the road when viewed from the vehicle  2   a . That is, when the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary starts traveling, the likelihood of the vehicle  2   a  colliding with the object  64  is low. Thus, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A determines that the significance of a potential hazard is low. 
     The system  1 A mounted in the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary may capture the images  50   k ,  50   k+1 , and  50   k+2  and calculate the positions and the sizes of the objects  64   k ,  64   k+1 , and  64   k+2 , respectively. In this case, the continuity which means that the size of the object  64  increases in the order of the objects  64   k ,  64   k+1 , and  64   k+2  indicates that the object  64  is approaching the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary at the intersection. Thus, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine that the significance of a potential hazard for the object  64   k+2  is higher than that for the object  64   k+1 . As described above, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may predict the significance of a potential hazard in accordance with change information regarding a change in the size of an object in at least two consecutive time-series images and the position of the object in the traffic mirror. That is, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may predict the significance of a potential hazard on the basis of the position of the object in the traffic mirror calculated by the calculating unit  101 A and the calculated size of the object. 
     The example where the change information regarding a change in the size is an amount of change in the size has been described above; however, the change information regarding a change in the size may be information indicating a type of the change. For example, the type of the change in the size may be an increase (or decrease) in the size or the size becoming greater than or equal to a predetermined size (or becoming less than the predetermined size). 
     In addition, in the case where the system  1 A mounted in the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary captures the images  50   k+2  and  50   k+3 , the object  64  is not in the traffic mirror  75  contained in the image  50   k+3 . However, because of the continuity which means that the object  64   j+2  is in the traffic mirror  75  contained in the image  50   j+2  captured at the time point t j+2  that is immediately before, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine that the image  50   j+3  is a blind spot image in which the object  64  may be present in a blind spot of the traffic mirror  75  and determine that the significance of a potential hazard for the object  64   j+3  is higher than that for the object  64   j+2 . 
     The hazard predicting unit  1031 A may also determine the significance of a potential hazard predicted if the vehicle  2   a  starts traveling without any precautions, on the basis of the position of the object in the traffic mirror calculated by the calculating unit  101 A. For example, in the case where the position of the objet calculated by the calculating unit  101 A is below the central line of the traffic mirror, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine that the significance of a potential hazard is higher than that in the case where the position is above the central line of the traffic mirror. In addition, in the case where the position of the object calculated by the calculating unit  101 A is on the right of a predetermined position in the traffic mirror, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine that the significance of a potential hazard is higher than that in the case where the position is on the left of the predetermined position in the traffic mirror. The predetermined position may be a position of the central axis or a predetermined position near the center. In addition, the central line is, for example, a line passing through the center of the traffic mirror and may be a horizontal line, a vertical line, an oblique line, or a curve. If the central line is a horizontal line, the significance of a potential hazard may be determined depending on whether the position of the object is above or below the central line. If the central line is a vertical line, the significance of a potential hazard may be determined depending on whether the position of the object is on the right side or on the left side. If the central line is an oblique line or a curve, the significance of a potential hazard may be determined depending on whether the position of the object is on one side or on the other side. 
     Information Generating Unit  1032 A 
     The information generating unit  1032 A generates driving assist information on the basis of the position of the object in the traffic mirror calculated by the calculating unit  101 A. For example, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate driving assist information in accordance with a positional relationship between the object and an area in the traffic mirror determined from the road contained in the image. The information generating unit  1032 A may generate driving assist information on the basis of the position of the object in the traffic mirror calculated in the calculating unit  101 A and the size of the object calculated by the calculating unit  101 A. For example, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate driving assist information in accordance with change information regarding a change in the size of the object in at least two consecutive time-series images and the position of the object in the traffic mirror. 
     More specifically, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate driving assist information in accordance with a positional relationship between the position of the object calculated in the object position calculating unit  1013  and the central axis calculated by the central axis calculating unit  1016 . For example, in the case where the object is located above the central axis in an image, the information generating unit  1032 A generates driving assist information for causing the vehicle to avoid the object. 
     In addition, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate driving assist information on the basis of a positional relationship between the position of the object calculated by the calculating unit  101 A and the central line of the traffic mirror. For example, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate driving assist information for causing the vehicle to avoid the object (i) if the object is located on the right of the central line in the image in the case where the traffic mirror is directed toward left when viewed from the vehicle or (ii) if the object is located on the left of the central line in the image in the case where the traffic mirror is directed toward the right when viewed from the vehicle. 
     In the second embodiment, the information generating unit  1032 A generates driving assist information in accordance with the significance of a potential hazard predicted by the hazard predicting unit  1031 A. For example, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate vehicle control information on the basis of a potential hazard predicted by the hazard predicting unit  1031 A. In addition, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate driving assist information in accordance with a potential hazard predicted from the position of the object in the traffic mirror in the case where the vehicle travels in a direction to be closer to the traffic mirror. 
     Note that the information generating unit  1032 A may output, as the driving assist information, information indicating the significance of a potential hazard predicted by the hazard predicting unit  1031 A. For example, the information generating unit  1032 A outputs, as driving assist information, information indicating the significance of a potential hazard determined by the hazard predicting unit  1031 A in accordance with an amount of change in the size of the object in at least two consecutive time-series images. 
     Further, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate driving assist information including vehicle control information for causing the vehicle to temporarily stop on the basis of the position of the object calculated by the object position calculating unit  1013  and the determination of a blind spot image by the blind spot determining unit  103 . Specifically, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate driving assist information in the case where an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  in at least one image among a plurality of consecutive time-series images is not recognized by the recognizing unit  13  in an image subsequent to the at least one image in the time series. In addition, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate driving assist information on the basis of the position of the object in the at least one image and non-detection of the object in a subsequent image by the recognizing unit  13 . 
     Information Output Unit  1033 A 
     The information output unit  1033 A outputs the driving assist information generated by the information generating unit  1032 A. 
     The description has been given of the example where the driving assist information is control command information above; however, the driving assist information may be indication information. For example, the indication information may be information indicating a potential hazard (described later) or information indicating a recommended operation for the driver. 
     Now, an example of an output process performed by the output processing unit  102 A thus configured is described with reference to the drawings. 
       FIG. 39  is a diagram illustrating an example of a T-intersection assumed in the second embodiment.  FIG. 40  is an explanatory diagram illustrating another example of the output process performed by the output processing unit  102 A in accordance with the second embodiment.  FIG. 39  illustrates a circumstance where the vehicle  2   a  having the information processing apparatus  10 A or the system  1 A according to the second embodiment mounted therein is temporarily stationary at a T-intersection. 
     In this case, when the size of the object per period decreases or remains substantially unchanged, the output processing unit  102 A, specifically, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A, determines the significance of a potential hazard is low regardless of whether the position of the object in the traffic mirror  75  is on the distal side or on the proximal side as illustrated in  FIG. 40 . In this case, the output processing unit  102 A, specifically, the information generating unit  1032 A, may output information indicating that the significance of a potential hazard predicted by the hazard predicting unit  1031 A is low. In addition, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary to start traveling on the basis of the low significance of a potential hazard as illustrated in  FIG. 40 . In the example illustrated in  FIG. 39 , when the size of the vehicle  3  in the traffic mirror  75  decreases or remains substantially unchanged, it can be determined that the vehicle  3  is traveling in a direction to be away from the vehicle  2   a . Thus, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A determines that the significance of a potential hazard is low. The information generating unit  1032 A may generate information indicating that the determined significance of a potential hazard is low or vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary to start traveling. 
     When the position of the object in the traffic mirror  75  is on the proximal side and the size of the object in the traffic mirror  75  increases, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A determines that the significance of a potential hazard is intermediate as illustrated in  FIG. 40 . In this case, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate information indicating that the significance of a potential hazard determined by the hazard predicting unit  1031 A is intermediate. In addition, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary to start traveling slowly on the basis of the intermediate significance of a potential hazard as illustrated in  FIG. 40 . In the example illustrated in  FIG. 39 , when the position of the vehicle  3  in the traffic mirror  75  is on the proximal side and the size of the vehicle  3  in the traffic mirror  75  increases, it can be determined that the vehicle  3  is traveling in a direction to be closer to the vehicle  2   a  on the distal side of the road from the vehicle  2   a . Thus, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A determines that the significance of a potential hazard is intermediate. The information generating unit  1032 A may generate information indicating that the determined significance of a potential hazard is intermediate or vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary to start traveling slowly. 
     When the position of the object in the traffic mirror  75  is on the distal side and the size of the object in the traffic mirror  75  increases, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A determines that the significance of a potential hazard is high as illustrated in  FIG. 40 . In this case, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate information indicating that the significance of a potential hazard determined by the hazard predicting unit  1031 A is high. In addition, the information generating unit  1032 A may generate, on the basis of the high significance of a potential hazard, vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary to start traveling after passage of the vehicle  3 , which is a target, is confirmed using a sensor or the like as illustrated in  FIG. 40 . In the example illustrated in  FIG. 39 , when the size of the vehicle  3  in the traffic mirror  75  increases, it can be determined that the vehicle  3  is traveling in a direction to be closer to the vehicle  2   a  on the proximal side of the road. Thus, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A determines that the significance of a potential hazard is high. The information generating unit  1032 A may generate information indicating that the determined significance of a potential hazard is high or vehicle control information for causing the vehicle  2   a  that is temporarily stationary to start traveling after passage of the vehicle  3  is confirmed using a sensor or the like. 
     Operation of System  1 A 
     An information processing method performed by the system  1 A thus configured will be described next.  FIG. 41  is a flowchart illustrating an outline of the information processing method performed by the system  1 A in accordance with the second embodiment.  FIG. 42  is a flowchart illustrating details of the information processing method performed by the system  1 A in accordance with the second embodiment. In  FIG. 42 , steps that are the same or substantially the same as those of  FIG. 19  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof. 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 41 , the system  1 A first detects a traffic mirror contained in an image and an object reflected in the traffic mirror on the basis of image information (S 20 ). Then, the system  1 A calculates the position of the object in the traffic mirror detected in S 20  (S 21 ). Then, the system  1 A generates driving assist information on the basis of the position calculated in S 21  (S 22 ). Then, the system  1 A outputs driving assist information generated in S 22  (S 23 ). 
     More specifically, as illustrated in  FIG. 42 , in the process of S 21 , the system  1 A performs an object position calculation process to calculate the position of the object recognized in S 103  in the traffic mirror detected in S 102  (S 204 ). Then, the system  1 A performs an object size calculation process to calculate the size of the object recognized in S 103  relative to the traffic mirror detected in S 102  (S 205 ). Then, the system  1 A performs a road area calculation process to calculate a road area in the traffic mirror detected in S 102  (S 206 ). Then, the system  1 A performs a central axis calculation process to calculate the central axis of the road area calculated in S 206  (S 207 ). Since details of the processes performed in S 204  to S 207  are as described above, a detailed description thereof is omitted here. 
     In the process of S 22  described in  FIG. 41 , the system  1 A performs a hazard prediction process to determine the significance of a potential hazard predicted if the vehicle starts traveling without any precautions, on the basis of the position of the object in the traffic mirror calculated in S 21  (S 221 ). Then, the system  1 A performs an information generation process to generate, as driving assist information, information indicating the significance of a potential hazard determined in S 221  or vehicle control information for controlling the vehicle on the basis of the significance of a potential hazard determined in S 221  (S 222 ). Since details of the processes performed in S 221  and S 222  are as described above, a detailed description thereof is omitted here. 
     Then, the system  1 A performs the process of S 23  described in  FIG. 41 . More specifically, in S 23 , the system  1 A performs an information output process to output the driving assist information or the like generated in S 222  (S 223 ). 
     Advantageous Effects of Second Embodiment 
     As described above, the information processing apparatus  10 A or the system  1 A according to the second embodiment is able to determine the significance of a potential hazard by using a traffic mirror at a place such as an intersection where the view from a vehicle is obstructed or restricted and to generate and output driving assist information for the vehicle on the basis of the determined significance of a potential hazard. Consequently, the information processing apparatus  10 A or the system  1 A according to the second embodiment is able to assist safe driving of a vehicle having the information processing apparatus  10 A or the system  1 A mounted therein. 
     Specifically, when an object such as a person is in a traffic mirror at a place such as an intersection where the view from a vehicle is obstructed or restricted, the object may abruptly come out to the place. In such a case, if the vehicle that is temporarily stationary starts traveling soon, the vehicle may collide with the object. In addition, traffic mirrors have characteristics that the left and the right are reversed therein. 
     Thus, in the case where an object, such as a person, is reflected to be on the distal side in a traffic mirror, the object is moving in the vicinity of a road shoulder closer to the vehicle that is temporarily stationary at a place, compared with the case where an object, such as a person, is reflected to be on the proximal side in the traffic mirror. That is, in the case where an object, such as a person, is reflected to be on the distal side in the traffic mirror, if the vehicle that is temporarily stationary starts traveling soon, the likelihood of the vehicle colliding with the object is higher than in the case where an object, such as a person, is reflected to be on the proximal side in the traffic mirror. 
     For this reason, in the second embodiment, the significance of a potential hazard is determined in accordance with the position of an object in a traffic mirror contained in images that can be captured from a vehicle that is temporarily stationary and, if necessary, a change in the size of the object. In this way, the information processing apparatus  10 A according to the second embodiment is able to determine the significance of a potential hazard by using a traffic mirror. 
     In the case where a vehicle in which automated driving is enabled includes the information processing apparatus  10 A, for example, the vehicle is able to determine the significance of a potential hazard by using a traffic mirror in a manner as described above. Thus, the vehicle is able to perform control in accordance with the determined significance of a potential hazard. 
     In addition, as described above, the information processing apparatus  10 A according to the second embodiment may generate driving assist information for causing the vehicle to avoid the object if the object is located above the central axis in the image, for example. With such information, the vehicle successfully avoids the object when the object is located closely to the vehicle, and the safety of the object and the vehicle can be guaranteed. 
     In addition, the information processing apparatus  10 A according to the second embodiment may generate driving assist information for causing the vehicle to avoid the object (i) if the object is located on the right side of the central line in the image in the case where the traffic mirror is directed toward the left when viewed from the vehicle or (ii) if the object is located on the left side of the central line in the image in the case where the traffic mirror is directed toward the right when viewed from the vehicle, for example. With such information, the vehicle successfully avoids the object when the object is located closely to the vehicle, and the safety of the object and the vehicle can be guaranteed. In addition, complex processing such as determination of the central axis of the road can be omitted, and consequently the processing speed can be increased. 
     As described above, the information processing apparatus  10 A or the system  1 A according to the second embodiment is able to assist safe driving of a vehicle by using a traffic mirror at a place such as an intersection where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted. 
     The description has been given of the example where the vehicle is temporarily stationary above; however, the second embodiment may be applied to a vehicle that is moving at a low speed (speed lower than a predetermined speed). 
     First Modification 
     In the second embodiment, the description has been given of the case where the significance of a potential hazard is determined in accordance with the position of the object in the traffic mirror and, if necessary, the size of the object; however, the criteria to be used in the determination of the significance of a potential hazard are not limited to these ones. The recognizing unit  13  may recognize an attribute of an object reflected in a traffic mirror, and the calculating unit  101 A may determine the significance of a potential hazard by taking into account the attribute. In a first modification, a description will be given of the case where the significance of a potential hazard is determined by further taking into account an attribute regarding the moving speed of the object reflected in the traffic mirror. 
       FIG. 43  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit  102 A in accordance with the first modification of the second embodiment. In  FIG. 43 , content that is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIG. 40  is denoted by the same expression to omit a detailed description thereof. In addition,  FIG. 43  illustrates an example of the hazard prediction process performed for a T-intersection by the output processing unit  102 A in accordance with the first modification. Since the vehicle control information based on the low, intermediate, or high significance of a potential hazard may be the same as that illustrated in  FIG. 40 , an illustration thereof is omitted in  FIG. 43 . 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 43 , in the case where an object is a person, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine the significance of a potential hazard in the same or substantially the same manner as that illustrated in  FIG. 40 . On the other hand, in the case where the object is a bicycle, a motor cycle, or an automobile that has a higher moving speed than a person, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine a higher significance of a potential hazard than in the case where the object is a person in accordance with the moving speed. 
     As described above, in the first modification, the output processing unit  102 A generates driving assist information in accordance with an attribute of an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  and outputs the generated driving assist information. 
     Second Modification 
     In the first modification, the description has been given of the case where the significance of a potential hazard is determined by further taking into account an attribute regarding the moving speed of an object reflected in a traffic mirror; however, the attribute used in the determination is not limited to the one regarding the moving speed. In the case where an object reflected in a traffic mirror is a person, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine the significance of a potential hazard by further taking into account an attribute regarding the age of the person. This case will be described below as a second modification. 
       FIG. 44  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit  102 A in accordance with the second modification of the second embodiment. In  FIG. 44 , content that is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIG. 40  is denoted by the same expression to omit a detailed description thereof. In addition,  FIG. 44  illustrates an example of the hazard prediction process performed for a T-intersection by the output processing unit  102 A in the second modification. Since the vehicle control information based on the low, intermediate, or high significance of a potential hazard may be the same as that illustrated in  FIG. 40 , an illustration thereof is omitted in  FIG. 44 . 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 44 , in the case where an object is a person and the person is a child or an elderly person, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine the significance of a potential hazard in the same or substantially same manner as that illustrated in  FIG. 40 . On the other hand, if the object is a person and the person is neither a child nor an elderly person, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine a higher significance of a potential hazard than in the case where the person is a child or an elderly person. 
     As described above, in the second modification, in the case where an attribute of an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  indicates a person, the output processing unit  102 A generates driving assist information that changes depending on information regarding the age of the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  and outputs the generated driving assist information. The example where the information regarding the age represents a generation of the person has been described above; however, the information regarding the age may represent the age or the age range of the person. 
     Third Modification 
     In the second modification, the description has been given of the case where, if an object reflected in a traffic mirror is a person, the significance of a potential hazard is determined by further taking into account an attribute regarding the age of the person; however, the attribute used in the determination is not limited to the attribute regarding the age. In the case where an object reflected in a traffic mirror is a person, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine the significance of a potential hazard by further taking into account an attribute regarding whether or not the person is behaving carelessly. Specifically, a careless behavior indicates a behavior without looking ahead. Examples of a behavior without looking ahead include looking at a mobile terminal, such as a smartphone, or a book while moving. This case will be described below as a third modification. 
       FIG. 45  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a hazard prediction process performed by the output processing unit  102 A in accordance with the third modification of the second embodiment. In  FIG. 45 , content that is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIG. 40  is denoted by the same expression to omit a detailed description thereof. In addition,  FIG. 45  illustrates an example of the hazard prediction process performed for a T-intersection by the output processing unit  102 A in accordance with the third modification. Since the vehicle control information based on the low, intermediate, or high significance of a potential hazard may be the same as that illustrated in  FIG. 40 , an illustration thereof is omitted in  FIG. 45 . 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 45 , in the case where an object is a person and the person does not take a behavior without looking ahead, which involves the person looking at a mobile terminal while moving, that is, the person is not looking at a mobile terminal while walking, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine the significance of a potential hazard in the same or substantially the same manner as that illustrated in  FIG. 40 . On the other hand, in the case where the object is a person and the person is taking a behavior without looking ahead, that is, the person is looking at a mobile terminal while walking, the hazard predicting unit  1031 A may determine a higher significance of a potential hazard than in the case where the person is not taking a behavior without looking ahead. The example where the careless behavior is a behavior without looking ahead has been described above; however, the careless behavior may indicate a behavior, such as the person looking ahead but looking above or below while moving or the person looking at a specific object, such as a baby buggy or a ball, located in front of the person while moving. 
     As described above, in the third modification, in the case where an attribute of an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  indicates a person, the output processing unit  102 A generates driving assist information that changes depending on whether the person recognized by the recognizing unit  13  is behaving carelessly and outputs the generated driving assist information. 
     Third Embodiment 
     Traffic mirrors are installed at places where the view from a vehicle is obstructed or restricted other than T-intersections or circular-curve roads mentioned in the first and second embodiments. 
     For example, it is highly likely that a vehicle comes out fast without slowing down at places near the exit of a limited-access road. It is also highly likely that a person or a vehicle abruptly comes out at an entrance/exit of a parking lot of a shopping mall. In addition, it is highly likely that a person abruptly comes out at an entrance/exit of a shopping mall since many people go into and come out from the shopping mall. It is also likely that a vehicle that does not slow down departs from the lane, that is, veers at places where bends follow the straight road where the speed of a vehicle often becomes high, for example. The likelihood of a traffic accident is high at such places where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted and where traffic mirrors are installed. However, the significance of a potential hazard changes depending on the position of a vehicle of interest or the installed place of a traffic mirror because conditions, such as whether the place of interest is a place where many people are present or a place where vehicles travel at high speed, change. 
     Accordingly, in the third embodiment, a description will be given of an information processing apparatus and the like capable of assisting safe driving of a vehicle that is temporarily stationary or is traveling by taking into account characteristics of an installed place of a traffic mirror. Hereinafter, a vehicle having a system or an information processing apparatus according to the third embodiment mounted therein is referred to as a vehicle of interest. 
     Configuration of System  1 B 
       FIG. 46  is a block diagram illustrating an example of a configuration of a system  1 B according to the third embodiment. Components that are the same or substantially the same as the components illustrated in  FIGS. 1 and 26  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof. 
     The system  1 B illustrated in  FIG. 46  differs from the system  1  according to the first embodiment in configurations of an obtaining unit  11 B, a detection processing unit  12   b , and an information processing apparatus  10 B. Like the system  1 , the system  1 B is mounted in a vehicle, for example, an automobile and is able to output driving assist information for the vehicle, that is, the vehicle of interest, by using a traffic mirror. 
     In the third embodiment, the information processing apparatus  10 B also takes into account characteristics of an installed place of a traffic mirror, in order to assist safe driving of the vehicle of interest that is temporary stationary or is traveling. 
     Obtaining Unit  11 B 
     Like the image obtaining unit  11 , the obtaining unit  11 B obtains image information representing images captured by an image capturing apparatus mounted in the vehicle of interest. The obtaining unit  11 B may obtain map information. Map information is information representing a dynamically changing state at a geographical position or static geographical information. Map information includes additional map information representing at least one of a traffic accident, a traffic jam, a road construction, a road surface condition, and weather on a map. 
     Note that the obtaining unit  11 B differs from the image obtaining unit  11  according to the first embodiment in that the obtaining unit  11 B is capable of obtaining map information; however, the rest is the same. In the obtaining unit  11 B, the sensing unit  111  may obtain map information via communication, and the obtained map information may be stored in the image storage unit  112 . 
     Detection Processing Unit  12   b    
     The detection processing unit  12   b  detects a traffic mirror and an object reflected in the traffic mirror. In the third embodiment, the detection processing unit  12   b  detects a traffic mirror located near the vehicle of interest on the basis of the map information or image information representing images captured by the image capturing apparatus mounted in the vehicle. 
     The detection processing unit  12   b  includes a detecting unit  12 B and a recognizing unit  13 B as illustrated in  FIG. 46 . 
     Detecting Unit  12 B 
     The detecting unit  12 B detects a traffic mirror. More specifically, the detecting unit  12 B detects a traffic mirror located near the vehicle of the interest on the basis of the image information. For example, the detecting unit  12 B detects a traffic mirror located near the vehicle of interest on the basis of the image information by using traffic mirror identification information or a traffic mirror classifier. Note that a method for detecting a traffic mirror located near the vehicle of interest on the basis of the image information is substantially the same as the method for detecting a traffic mirror in an image described in the first embodiment. 
     The detecting unit  12 B may also detect a traffic mirror located near the vehicle of interest on the basis of map information. For example, the detecting unit  12 B detects a traffic mirror located near the vehicle of interest on the basis of the position of the vehicle and an installed place of the traffic mirror indicated by the map information. 
     Recognizing Unit  13 B 
     The recognizing unit  13 B recognizes an object reflected in a traffic mirror on the basis of image information representing images captured by the image capturing apparatus mounted in the vehicle of interest. The recognizing unit  13 B also recognizes an environment near the traffic mirror on the basis of the image information by using traffic mirror identification information or a traffic mirror classifier. In this way, the recognizing unit  13 B recognizes an object in a traffic mirror contained in an image obtained by the obtaining unit  11 B and an environment near the traffic mirror. 
     Note that the obtaining unit  11 B and the detection processing unit  12   b  may be included the information processing apparatus  10 B, as in the first and second embodiments. 
     Information Processing Apparatus  10 B 
     The information processing apparatus  10 B according to the third embodiment outputs driving assist information for the vehicle of interest that is temporarily stationary or is traveling by using a traffic mirror. In the third embodiment, the information processing apparatus  10 B also takes into account characteristics of an installed place of the traffic mirror, in order to assist safe driving of the vehicle of interest that is temporarily stationary or is traveling. In this case, the significance of a potential hazard that changes depending on the position of the vehicle of interest or the installed place of the traffic mirror can be taken into account as described above. 
     More specifically, the information processing apparatus  10 B includes an output processing unit  102 B, the blind spot determining unit  103 , and a determining unit  104  as illustrated in  FIG. 46 . The information processing apparatus  10 B illustrated in  FIG. 46  differs from the information processing apparatus  10  according to the first embodiment in that the determining unit  104  is added and the output processing unit  102 B has a different configuration. Details of the configurations of the determining unit  104  and the output processing unit  102 B will be described below. 
     Determining Unit  104   
       FIG. 47  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of the determining unit  104  in accordance with the third embodiment. 
     The determining unit  104  includes a characteristics determining unit  1041 , a first hazard significance determining unit  1042 , and a second hazard significance determining unit  1043  as illustrated in  FIG. 47 . 
     Characteristics Determining Unit  1041   
     The characteristics determining unit  1041  determines characteristics of an installed place of a traffic mirror. The characteristics include a state of the road at the installed place of the traffic mirror and a passage state of an object at the installed place of the traffic mirror. 
     More specifically, the characteristics determining unit  1041  determines characteristics of an installed place of a traffic mirror on the basis of map information. For example, the characteristics determining unit  1041  determines the characteristics on the basis of map information for an area near the traffic mirror. The characteristics determining unit  1041  may determine a state of the road and a passage state of an object from additional map information. 
     In addition, the characteristics determining unit  1041  may determine characteristics of an installed place of a traffic mirror on the basis of image information. For example, the characteristics determining unit  1041  may determine characteristics on the basis of an environment near the traffic mirror. The characteristics determining unit  1041  may determine a state of the road or a passage state of an object from the environment near the traffic mirror. 
     Further, the characteristics determining unit  1041  may determine the characteristics on the basis of an object reflected in a traffic mirror. In this case, the characteristics determining unit  1041  may determine the characteristics on the basis of whether an object is reflected in the traffic mirror or whether many objects are reflected in the traffic mirror. 
     Note that the characteristics determining unit  1041  may further include an installed place obtaining unit that obtains information regarding characteristics of the installed place of a traffic mirror contained in an image obtained by continuously capturing images of the scenery ahead of the vehicle of interest in time series. The installed place obtaining unit is not necessarily included in the characteristics determining unit  1041  and may be included in the detection processing unit  12   b  or the obtaining unit  11 B. 
     For example, the installed place obtaining unit is capable of determining an installed place of a traffic mirror contained in an image obtained by continuously capturing images of the scenery ahead of the vehicle of interest in time series, from Global Positioning System (GPS) information indicating the position of the vehicle of interest. In this case, the installed place obtaining unit obtains information regarding characteristics of the installed place of a traffic mirror from the obtained installed place and a local dynamic map containing accident blackspot information, traffic jam information, road construction information, traffic accident site information, and road surface information. 
     Characteristics of the installed place of a traffic mirror are the aforementioned road conditions. Specifically, the road conditions include accident blackspots where accidents often occur or actually occurred, a road congestion degree such as the number of vehicles or whether a traffic jam is present, a road surface condition such as the road being covered with fallen leaves, fallen rocks, or snow or the road being frozen, and the presence or absence of a road construction. Examples of the accident blackspots include a place near the exit of a limited-access road, an entrance/exit of a parking lot of a shopping mall or an entrance/exit of a shopping mall, or a corner that follows a straight road where vehicles often travel at high speed. 
       FIG. 48  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a dynamic map. A local dynamic map is a partial dynamic map near a predetermined place and is enhanced map information obtained by superimposing dynamic information that instantly changes near the position of the vehicle of interest onto high-definition map data of the roads and features, which is static information. In the local dynamic map, semi-static data, semi-dynamic data, and dynamic data are superimposed on lowest-layer base data, which is static information including road surface information, lane information, and three-dimensional structure information as illustrated in  FIG. 48 , for example. Examples of the semi-static data include traffic restrictions information, road construction information, and wide-area weather information. Examples of the semi-dynamic data include traffic accident information, traffic jam information, and narrow-area weather information. Examples of the dynamic data include anticipated information obtained by intelligent transport systems (ITS), such as near vehicle information, pedestrian information, and traffic signal information. 
     In addition, the installed place obtaining unit may obtain the information regarding characteristics of an installed place of a traffic mirror from the installed position obtained by using GPS information and an environment near the traffic mirror contained in an image captured by an onboard camera mounted in the vehicle of interest. Further, the characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror may be a passage state of an object at the installed place. Specifically, the passage state of an object at the installed place indicates whether people or vehicles enter or exit or a degree at which people or vehicles enter or exit. 
     In the third embodiment, the information regarding characteristics of an installed place of a traffic mirror is information that is obtained by using map information or a captured image described above and that indicates whether the installed place is a place where a traffic accident is likely to occur. 
     Each of  FIGS. 49A to 49E  illustrates an example of an environment near a traffic mirror assumed in the third embodiment. Examples of the environment near the traffic mirror include an entrance/exit of a commercial facility, such as a shopping mall, illustrated in  FIGS. 49A to 49E . Since the entrances/exits of commercial facilities have variations as illustrated in  FIGS. 49A to 49E , the installed place obtaining unit may include a commercial-facility-entrance/exit classifier obtained by performing learning (such as deep learning) in which images of entrances/exists of commercial facilities are used as the input. In this way, the installed place obtaining unit is able to obtain information representing places where a traffic accident is likely to occur, such as an entrance/exit of a parking lot of a shopping mall or an entrance/exit of a shopping mall, from images of an environment near the traffic mirror. 
       FIG. 50  is a diagram illustrating an example of a map  86  used by the installed place obtaining unit in accordance with the third embodiment. 
     The installed place obtaining unit may obtain information regarding characteristics of the installed place of a traffic mirror from an environment near the traffic mirror contained in an image after the map  86  illustrated in  FIG. 50  indicating the current position of the vehicle of interest is acquired because of the following reason. In the case where the vehicle of interest is currently located near a commercial facility  860 , such as a shopping mall, on the map  86  illustrated in  FIG. 50  and the vehicle of interest is then located in an indoor parking lot of the commercial facility  860 , where GPS information is not obtainable, it can be determined that the current location of the vehicle of interest is at the commercial facility  860 . In this way, the installed place obtaining unit is able to more accurately obtain information representing a place where a traffic accident is likely to occur, such as an entrance/exit of a parking lot of the commercial facility  860 , from an environment near a traffic mirror contained in an image. 
     In the case where the vehicle of interest is currently located at an outdoor parking lot of a shopping mall, where GPS information is obtainable, the installed place obtaining unit may obtain information regarding characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror from geographic information. 
     First Hazard Significance Determining Unit  1042   
     The first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines the first significance of a potential hazard, which indicates how high a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest is likely to occur on the basis of the information regarding the characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror obtained by the installed place obtaining unit. The first hazard significance determining unit  1042  may determine the first significance of a potential hazard on the basis of the information regarding the characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror which is determined (obtained) on the basis of the current position of the vehicle of interest and the map information, or may determine the first significance of a potential hazard on the basis of the information regarding the characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror which is determined (obtained) on the basis of an environment near the traffic mirror contained in an image. 
     First, an example of how the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines the first significance of a potential hazard on the basis of geographical information will be described with reference to  FIGS. 51 to 54 .  FIGS. 51 to 54  are diagrams each illustrating an example of a local dynamic map used by the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  for the determination in accordance with the third embodiment. The same or substantially the same components are denoted by the same reference signs in  FIGS. 51 to 54 . 
       FIG. 51  illustrates an example of a local dynamic map  86   t  obtained based on the current position of the vehicle of interest during commuting hours. It is assumed in  FIG. 51  that roads  861 ,  862 , and  864  and an expressway  863  are roads along which the vehicle of interest possibly travels. It is also assumed that the local dynamic map  86   t  contains traffic accident information and traffic jam information that dynamically change and information indicating that there are many commuters who use the road  861 . 
     In this case, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is the highest for the road  861  that is hatched and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard of the road  861  is high. In addition, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is the next highest for the road  862  that is hatched, links to the road  861 , and extends near a commercial facility  865 , and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard of the road  862  is intermediate. The first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is low for the expressway  863  and the road  864 , other than the roads  861  and  862 , and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard of the expressway  863  and the road  864  is low. 
       FIG. 52  illustrates an example of a local dynamic map  86   t   1  obtained based on the current position of the vehicle of interest during long consecutive holidays. It is assumed that the local dynamic map  86   t   1  contains, as traffic accident information and traffic jam information that dynamically change, information indicating that a traffic jam and a traffic accident are likely to occur at the expressway  863 . In this case, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is the highest for the expressway  863  that is hatched and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard of the expressway  863  is high. In addition, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is the next highest for the roads  862  and  864  that are hatched and link to the expressway  863  and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard of the roads  862  and  864  is intermediate. The first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is low for the road  862  other than the expressway  863  and the roads  862  and  864  and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard is low. 
       FIG. 53  illustrates an example of a local dynamic map  86   t   2  obtained on the basis of the current position of the vehicle of interest on Saturday or Sunday afternoon. It is assumed that the local dynamic map  86   t   2  contains, as traffic accident information and traffic jam information that dynamically change, a graph indicating hours in which the commercial facility  865  such as a shopping mall is crowded and information indicating that a traffic jam and a traffic accident often occur at the road  862  that links to the commercial facility  865 . 
     In this case, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is the highest for the road  862  that is hatched and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard of the road  862  is high. In addition, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is the next highest for the road  861  that is hatched and links to the road  862  and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard is intermediate. The first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is low for the expressway  863  and the road  864  other than the roads  861  and  862  and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard is low. 
       FIG. 54  illustrates a local dynamic map  86   t   3  obtained based on the current position of the vehicle of interest when an event is held. In addition, it is assumed that the local dynamic map  86   t   3  contains, as traffic accident information and traffic jam information that dynamically change, information indicating that a traffic jam and a traffic accident often occur at the road  862  that links to a concert hall  866  where an event such as a concert is held. 
     In this case, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is the highest for the road  862  that is hatched and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard of the road  862  is high. In addition, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is the next highest for the road  861  that is hatched and links to the road  862  and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard of the road  861  is intermediate. The first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is low for the expressway  863  and the road  864  other than the roads  861  and  862  and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard is low. 
     As described above, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  is able to determine the first significance of a potential hazard on the basis of geographical information representing traffic accident information and traffic jam information that dynamically change depending on the current position of the vehicle of interest, the current time or the season, and whether or not an event or the like is currently held. 
     An example of how the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines the first significance of a potential hazard on the basis of an environment near a traffic mirror contained in an image will be described next. It is assumed that the installed place obtaining unit has obtained information regarding characteristics of the installed place of a traffic mirror, such as the entrance/exit of a shopping mall or a parking lot, from the environment near the traffic mirror contained in an image. 
     When it is deduced that the vehicle of interest is currently located at a parking lot of a commercial facility such as a shopping mall on the basis of the information regarding the characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is intermediate and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard is intermediate because of the following reason. Since many cars are parked at the parking lot, the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted in the parking lot when the vehicle of interest moves around. When the information regarding the characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror indicates that the vehicle of interest is currently located at an entrance/exit of a commercial facility such as a shopping mall or of a parking lot, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring is high and determines that the first significance of a potential hazard is high because of the following reason. Since many people are moving around at the entrance/exit of the commercial facility, the likelihood of the vehicle of interest colliding with a person is high. In addition, since the road is usually sloped at the entrance/exist of the parking lot of a shopping mall, an automobile or a motor cycle may accelerate or suddenly comes out after stopping temporarily. Thus, the likelihood of the vehicle of interest colliding with an automobile or a motor cycle is high. 
     Second Hazard Significance Determining Unit  1043   
     The second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines the second significance of a potential hazard, which is the significant of a potential hazard predicted if the vehicle of interest starts traveling, on the basis of the first significance of a potential hazard determined by the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  and the presence or absence of an object in a traffic mirror. 
     When there is an object reflected in a mirror, the likelihood of the vehicle of interest colliding with the object increases if the vehicle of interest starts traveling. Thus, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines the second significance of a potential hazard by taking into account such a likelihood. More specifically, in the case where the first significance of a potential hazard determined by the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  is low, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines that the second significance of a potential hazard is intermediate if an object is in a traffic mirror and determines that the second significance of a potential hazard is low if no object is in a traffic mirror. In the case where the first significance of a potential hazard determined by the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  is intermediate, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines that the second significance of a potential hazard is intermediate if an object is in a traffic mirror and determines that the second significance of a potential hazard is low if no object is in a traffic mirror. In addition, in the case where the first significance of a potential hazard determined by the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  is high, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines that the second significance of a potential hazard is high if an object is in a traffic mirror and determines the second significance of a potential hazard is intermediate if no object is in a traffic mirror. 
     For example, when the vehicle of interest is located at an entrance/exit of a parking lot of a shopping mall, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the first significance of a potential hazard is intermediate as described above since an automobile or a motor cycle may accelerate or suddenly come out after stopping temporarily at the entrance/exit. When an automobile is in a traffic mirror, the likelihood of the vehicle of interest located near the entrance/exit colliding with the automobile is high. Thus, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines that the second significance of a potential hazard is intermediate. On the other hand, when no automobile is in the traffic mirror, the likelihood of the vehicle of interest colliding with an automobile is low. Thus, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines that the second significance of a potential hazard is low. 
     In addition, when the vehicle of interest is located near an entrance/exit of a shopping mall, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  determines that the first significance of a potential hazard is high as described above since many people go into or come out from the shopping mall at the entrance/exit and the likelihood of a traffic accident occurring increases. When a person is in a traffic mirror, the likelihood of the vehicle of interest located near the entrance/exit colliding with the person is high. Thus, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines that the second significance of a potential hazard is high. On the other hand, when no person is in a traffic mirror, the likelihood of the vehicle of interest colliding with a person is low. Thus, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines that the second significance of a potential hazard is intermediate. 
     The second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine the second significance of a potential hazard on the basis of only the first significance of a potential hazard determined by the first hazard significance determining unit  1042 . In this case, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine that the second significance of a potential hazard is high if the first significance of a potential hazard determined by the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  is high. Similarly, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine that the second significance of a potential hazard is intermediate or low if the first significance of a potential hazard determined by the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  is intermediate or low. 
     In this way, the determining unit  104  determines the second significance of a potential hazard, as the characteristics of an installed place of a traffic mirror contained in an image obtained by continuously capturing images of the scenery ahead of the vehicle of interest in time series. 
     When the vehicle of interest is located in an area near an exit of a limited-access road or the like, for example, it is probable that an automobile exits from the limited-access road or an expressway without slowing down and the likelihood of a traffic accident occurring increases in the area. Thus, the first hazard significance determining unit  1042  may determine that the first significance of a potential hazard is high. Then, if an automobile is in a traffic mirror, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine that the second significance of a potential hazard is high since the likelihood of the vehicle of interest colliding with the automobile is high. On the other hand, no automobile is in a traffic mirror, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine that the second significance of a potential hazard is intermediate since the likelihood of the vehicle of interest colliding with an automobile is low. 
     The description has been given of the example where the presence or absence of an object reflected in a traffic mirror is used to determine the second significance of a potential hazard above; however, the kind of an object reflected in a traffic mirror, the number of objects reflected in the traffic mirror, or a density of objects reflected in the traffic mirror may be used to determine the second significance of a potential hazard. 
     Output Processing Unit  102 B 
     The output processing unit  102 B generates driving assist information on the basis of the characteristics determined by the determining unit  104  and outputs the generated driving assist information. The driving assist information may include control command information regarding a behavior of the vehicle or indication information to be provided to an occupant of the vehicle. The indication information may include information indicating a potential hazard predicted from the characteristics of the installed place of a traffic mirror. 
       FIG. 55  is a diagram illustrating an example of a functional configuration of the output processing unit  102 B in accordance with the third embodiment. 
     In the third embodiment, the output processing unit  102 B includes an information generating unit  1032 B and an information output unit  1033 B as illustrated in  FIG. 55 . 
     Information Generating Unit  1032 B 
     The information generating unit  1032 B generates driving assist information on the basis of the characteristics determined by the determining unit  104 . The information generating unit  1032 B may generate driving assist information in accordance with the determined state of the road or the determined passage state of an object. For example, if the determined state of the road or the determined passage state of an object indicates that the vehicle of interest is hindered from traveling safely, the information generating unit  1032 B generates driving assist information for causing the vehicle to decelerate, stop, or detour. In addition, for example, the information generating unit  1032 B may generate driving assist information for causing the vehicle to decelerate, stop, or detour when it is determined by the determining unit  104  that an object is in a traffic mirror or many objects are in the traffic mirror. 
     The information generating unit  1032 B may generate driving assist information in accordance with a potential hazard predicted from the characteristics. 
     The output processing unit  102 B may generate driving assist information also when a blind spot image described above is determined as in the second embodiment. For example, when the blind spot determining unit  103  determines a blind spot image, the output processing unit  102 B may generate, as driving assist information, information for causing the vehicle to temporarily stop for a predetermined period. 
     Information Output Unit  1033 B 
     The information output unit  1033 B outputs the driving assist information generated by the information generating unit  1032 B. 
     An example of an output process performed by the output processing unit  102 B thus configured will be described below with reference to the drawings.  FIGS. 56 and 57  are explanatory diagrams illustrating an example of the output process performed by the output processing unit  102 B in accordance with the third embodiment.  FIG. 56  illustrates an example of vehicle control information for the vehicle of interest output for a circular-curve road by the output processing unit  102 B in accordance with the third embodiment.  FIG. 57  illustrates an example of vehicle control information for the vehicle of interest output for a T-intersection by the output processing unit  102 B in accordance with the third embodiment.  FIGS. 56 and 57  also illustrate the first significance of a potential hazard based on the installed place of a traffic mirror and the presence or absence of an object reflected in a traffic mirror in addition to the second significance of a potential hazard and the vehicle control information. 
     When the vehicle of interest is located at a circular-curve road, the output processing unit  102 B may generate and output vehicle control information for controlling the vehicle as illustrated in  FIG. 56  on the basis of the second significance of a potential hazard determined by the second hazard significance determining unit  1043 . On the other hand, when the vehicle of interest is located at a T-intersection, the output processing unit  102 B may generate and output vehicle control information for controlling the vehicle as illustrated in  FIG. 57  on the basis of the second significance of a potential hazard determined by the second hazard significance determining unit  1043 . 
     Since a relationship between the second significance of a potential hazard and the vehicle control information is substantially the same as the relationship between the significance of a potential hazard and the vehicle control information described in  FIGS. 16 and 17 , a detailed description thereof is omitted. 
     Operation of System  1 B 
     An information processing method performed by the system  1 B thus configured will be described next.  FIG. 58  is a flowchart illustrating an outline of the information processing method performed by the system  1 B in accordance with the third embodiment.  FIG. 59  is a flowchart illustrating details of the information processing method performed by the system  1 B in accordance with the third embodiment. In  FIG. 59 , steps that are the same or substantially the same as those of  FIG. 19  are denoted by the same reference signs to omit a detailed description thereof. 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 58 , the system  1 B first obtains map information or image information representing an image captured by an image capturing apparatus mounted in a vehicle (S 30 ). Then, the system  1 B detects a traffic mirror located near the vehicle on the basis of the map information or image information obtained in S 30  (S 31 ). Then, the system  1 B determines characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror on the basis of the map information or the image information (S 32 ). Then, the system  1 B generates driving assist information on the basis of the characteristics determined in S 32  (S 33 ). Then, the system  1 B outputs the driving assist information generated in S 33  (S 34 ). 
     More specifically, the system  1 B first performs the process of S 30  described in  FIG. 58 , as illustrated in  FIG. 59 . Specifically, in the process of S 30 , the system  1 B performs an obtaining process to obtain map information or image information representing an image captured by an image capturing apparatus mounted in the vehicle (S 301 ). 
     Then, the system  1 B performs the process of S 31  described in  FIG. 58 . More specifically, in the process of S 31 , the system  1 B performs a detection process to detect a traffic mirror located near the vehicle on the basis of the map information or image information obtained in S 301  (S 302 ). The system  1 B also performs a recognition process to recognize an object in the traffic mirror on the basis of the image information obtained in S 301  (S 303 ). 
     Then, the system  1 B performs the process of S 32  described in  FIG. 58 . More specifically, in the process of S 32 , the system  1 B performs a characteristics determination process to determine characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror on the basis of the map information or the image information (S 304 ). Then, the system  1 B performs a first hazard significance determination process to determine the first significance of a potential hazard, which indicates the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest occurring, on the basis of information regarding the characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror (S 305 ). Then, the system  1 B performs a second hazard significance determination process to determine the second significance of a potential hazard, which is the significance of a potential hazard predicted if the vehicle of interest starts traveling, on the basis of whether there is an object reflected in the traffic mirror and the first significance of a potential hazard determined in S 305  (S 306 ). Since details of the processes performed in S 304  to S 306  are as described above, a detailed description thereof is omitted. 
     In addition, in the process of S 33 , the system  1 B performs an information generation process to generate driving assist information in accordance with the second significance of a potential hazard determined in S 306  (S 307 ). Since details of the process performed in S 307  is as described above, a description thereof is omitted. 
     Then, the system  1 B performs the process of S 34  described in  FIG. 57 . More specifically, in S 34 , the system  1 B performs an information output process to output the driving assist information or the like generated in S 307  (S 308 ). 
     Advantageous Effects of Third Embodiment 
     As described above, the information processing apparatus  10 B or the system  1 B according to the third embodiment is able to determine, by using a traffic mirror, the significance of a potential hazard (i.e., the second significance of a potential hazard) predicted if the vehicle starts traveling at places, such as an entrance/exit of a parking lot or a commercial facility in addition to an intersection, where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted. The information processing apparatus  10 B or the system  1 B according to the third embodiment is also able to generate and output driving assist information for the vehicle on the basis of the determined second significance of a potential hazard. Consequently, the information processing apparatus  10  or the system  1 A according to the third embodiment is able to assist safe driving of the vehicle having the information processing apparatus  10 A or the system  1 A mounted therein. 
     Specifically, if characteristics of the installed place of a traffic mirror indicate, that is, the installed place of the traffic mirror is a place where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted and a traffic accident is likely to occur, such as an intersection, an entrance/exit of a parking lot or a commercial facility, or an area near an exit of a limited-access road, a traffic accident involving the vehicle of interest may occur. That is, if the vehicle located at or near such a place starts traveling, a traffic accident involving the vehicle may occur. Further, in the case where the installed place of the traffic mirror is a place where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted and a traffic accident is likely to occur, the likelihood of a traffic accident involving the vehicle occurring increases if an object is in the traffic mirror. 
     Accordingly, in the third embodiment, the second significance of a potential hazard, which is the significance of a potential hazard predicted if the vehicle starts traveling, is determined on the basis of the characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror contained in an image obtained from the vehicle that is temporarily stationary or is traveling and the presence or absence of an object reflected in the traffic mirror. 
     In this way, the information processing apparatus  10 B according to the third embodiment is able to determine, by using a traffic mirror, the second significance of a potential hazard, which is the significance of a potential hazard predicted if the vehicle travels. 
     As described above, the second significance of a potential hazard, which is the significance of a potential hazard predicted if the vehicle travels, may be determined only from the characteristics of the installed place of the traffic mirror contained in an image that can be obtained from the vehicle that is temporarily stationary or is traveling. 
     In addition, in the case where a vehicle in which automated driving is enabled includes the information processing apparatus  10 B mounted therein, for example, the vehicle is able to determine the second significance of a potential hazard by using a traffic mirror in a manner as described above. Thus, the vehicle is able to perform control in accordance with the determined second significance of a potential hazard. 
     As described above, the information processing apparatus  10 B or the system  1 B according to the third embodiment is able to assist safe driving of a vehicle by using a traffic mirror at a place where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted. 
     First Modification 
     In the third embodiment, the description has been given of the case where the second significance of a potential hazard, which is the significance of a potential hazard predicted if the vehicle travels, is determined on the basis of the characteristics of the installed place of a traffic mirror and the presence or absence of an object reflected in the traffic mirror; however, the criteria used in the determination are not limited to these ones. The recognizing unit  13 B may recognize an attribute of an object reflected in a traffic mirror, and the determining unit  104  may determine the significance of a potential hazard by taking into account the attribute. In a first modification, a description will be given of the case where the significance of a potential hazard is determined by further taking into account an attribute regarding the moving speed of an object reflected in a traffic mirror. 
       FIG. 60  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of the second hazard significance determination process performed by the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  in accordance with the first modification of the third embodiment. In  FIG. 60 , content that is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIGS. 56 and 57  is denoted by the same expression to omit a detailed description thereof. In addition, since vehicle control information based on the low, intermediate, or high second significance of a potential hazard is the same as that illustrated in  FIG. 56 or 57 , an illustration thereof is omitted in  FIG. 60 . 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 60 , in the case where an object is a person, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine the second significance of a potential hazard in the same or substantially the same manner as in the case illustrated in  FIGS. 56 and 57 . On the other hand, in the case where the object is a bicycle, a motor cycle, or an automobile having a higher moving speed than a person, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine a higher second significance of a potential hazard than in the case where the object is a person in accordance with the moving speed. 
     As described above, in the first modification, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines the second significance of a potential hazard that changes depending on an attribute of an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13 B. As a result, the output processing unit  102 B is able to generate driving assist information in accordance with the attribute of the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13 B and output the generated driving assist information. 
     Second Modification 
     In the first modification, the description has been given of the case where the second significance of a potential hazard is determined by further taking into account an attribute regarding the moving speed of an object reflected in a traffic mirror; however, the attribute used in the determination is not limited to the attribute regarding the moving speed. In the case where an object reflected in a traffic mirror is a person, the second significance of a potential hazard may be determined by further taking into an attribute regarding the age of the person. This case will be described below as a second modification. 
       FIG. 61  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a second hazard significance determination process performed by the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  in accordance with the second modification of the third embodiment. In  FIG. 61 , content that is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIGS. 56 and 57  is denoted by the same expression to omit a detailed description thereof. Since vehicle control information based on the low, intermediate, or high second significance of a potential hazard is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIG. 56 or 57 , an illustration thereof is omitted in  FIG. 61 . 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 61 , if an object is a person and the person is a child or an elderly person, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine the second significance of a potential hazard in the same or substantially same manner as in  FIGS. 56 and 57 . On the other hand, if the object is a person and the person is neither a child nor an elderly person, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine a higher second significance of a potential hazard than in the case where the person is a child or an elderly person. 
     As described above, in the second modification, if an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13 B is a person, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines the second significance of a potential hazard that changes depending on the age of the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13 B. As a result, if the attribute of the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13 B indicates a person, the output processing unit  102 B is able to generate driving assist information that changes depending on the age of the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13  and output the generated driving assist information. The example where the information regarding the age represents a generation of the person has been described above; however, the information regarding the age may represent the age or the age range of the person. 
     Third Modification 
     In the second modification, the description has been given of the case where, if an object reflected in a traffic mirror is a person, the second significance of a potential hazard is determined by further taking into account an attribute regarding the age of the person; however, the attribute used in the determination is not limited to the attribute regarding the age. In the case where an object reflected in a traffic mirror is a person, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine the second significance of a potential hazard by further taking into account an attribute regarding whether or not the person is behaving carelessly. Specifically, a careless behavior indicates a behavior without looking ahead. Examples of a behavior without looking ahead include looking at a mobile terminal, such as a smartphone, or a book while moving. This case will be described below as a third modification. 
       FIG. 62  is an explanatory diagram illustrating an example of a second hazard significance determination process performed by the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  in accordance with the third modification of the third embodiment. In  FIG. 62 , content that is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIGS. 56 and 57  is denoted by the same expression to omit a detailed description thereof. In addition, since vehicle control information based on the low, intermediate, or high second significance of a potential hazard is the same or substantially the same as that illustrated in  FIG. 56 or 57 , an illustration thereof is omitted in  FIG. 62 . 
     As illustrated in  FIG. 62 , if an object is a person and the person does not take a behavior without looking ahead, which involves the person looking at a mobile terminal while moving, that is, the person is not looking at a mobile terminal while walking, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine the second significance of a potential hazard in the same manner as that in  FIGS. 56 and 57 . On the other hand, if the object is a person and the person is taking a behavior without looking ahead, that is, the person is looking at a mobile terminal while walking, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  may determine a higher second significance of a potential hazard than in the case where the person is not taking a behavior without looking ahead. The example where the careless behavior is a behavior without looking ahead has been described above; however, the careless behavior may indicate a behavior such as the person looking ahead but looking above or below while moving or the person looking at a specific object, such as a baby buggy or a ball, located in front of the person while moving. 
     As described above, in the third modification, in the case where an attribute of an object recognized by the recognizing unit  13 B indicates a person, the second hazard significance determining unit  1043  determines the second significance of a potential hazard that changes depending on whether the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13 B is behaving carelessly. As a result, in the case where the attribute of the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13 B indicates a person, the output processing unit  102 B is able to generate and output driving assist information that changes depending on whether the object recognized by the recognizing unit  13 B is behaving carelessly. 
     As described above, the information processing apparatuses, the information processing methods, and the like according to the embodiments of the present disclosure successfully assist the safe driving of a vehicle by using a traffic mirror installed at a place such as an intersection where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted. Traffic mirrors may be not installed everywhere in some of counties other than Japan; however, some kinds of equipment for preventing traffic accidents may be installed in the future at places where the view from the vehicle is obstructed or restricted to prevent traffic accidents. The use of the information processing apparatuses and the like according to the embodiments of the present disclosure can eliminate the necessity of installing costly equipment (radars, for example) and can increase transportation safety by using traffic mirrors which are less costly. 
     The description has been given using traffic mirrors having a circular or quadrangular shape in the embodiments above; however, the shapes of the traffic mirrors are not limited to these shapes. The scope of the present disclosure includes the case where the shape of the installed traffic mirror has deformed somehow and the mirror consequently has an uneven surface or the case where the surface of the traffic mirror is fogged. In such a case, the reliability may be introduced for recognition of an object reflected in a traffic mirror. If the reliability is lower than or equal to a threshold, it may be determined that information regarding an object reflected in the traffic mirror is unreliable, and the information processing methods according to the embodiments of the present disclosure may be unused. 
     While the information processing apparatuses, the information processing methods, and the like according to the present disclosure have been described above on the basis of the embodiments, the present disclosure is not limited to these embodiments. Embodiments obtained by making various modifications conceivable by a person skilled in the art and embodiments obtained by combining elements of different embodiments together may be within the scope of one or a plurality of aspects of the present disclosure as long as such embodiments do not depart from the essence of the present disclosure. For example, the following cases are included in the present disclosure. 
     (1) Each of the apparatuses described above is specifically a computer system including a microprocessor, a read-only memory (ROM), a random access memory (RAM), a hard disk unit, a display unit, a keyboard, a mouse, etc. The RAM or the hard disk unit stores a computer program. The microprocessor operates in accordance with the computer program, and consequently the apparatus implements functions thereof. The computer program is constituted by a combination of a plurality of instruction codes representing commands to the computer system in order to implement predetermined functions. 
     (2) Some or all of components of each of the apparatuses described above may be configured as a single system large scale integration (LSI) chip. A system LSI chip is an advanced multi-function LSI chip fabricated by integrating multiple components onto a single chip, and specifically is a computer system including a microprocessor, a ROM, a RAM, etc. The RAM stores a computer program. The microprocessor operates in accordance with the computer program, and consequently the system LSI chip implements functions thereof. 
     (3) Some or all of the components of each of the apparatuses described above may also be configured as an IC card or a separate module that may be removably inserted into each apparatus. The IC card or module is a computer system including a microprocessor, a ROM, a RAM, etc. The IC card or module may also include the aforementioned advanced multi-function LSI. The microprocessor operates in accordance with a computer program, and consequently the IC card or module implements functions thereof. The IC card or the module may also be tamper-resistant. 
     (4) The present disclosure may be regarded as the methods described above. In addition, these methods may be regarded as computer programs that implement the methods by using a computer, or a digital signal representing the computer program. 
     (5) In addition, the present disclosure may also be realized by storing the computer program or the digital signal onto a computer-readable recording medium, such as a flexible disk, a hard disk, a Compact Disc-Read Only Memory (CD-ROM), an MO, a Digital Versatile Disc (DVD), a DVD-ROM, a DVD-RAM, a Blu-ray (registered trademark) Disc (BD), or a semiconductor memory, for example. In addition, the present disclosure may also be regarded as the digital signal stored on these recording media. 
     (6) In addition, the present disclosure may also be realized by transmitting the computer program or the digital signal over an electrical communication network, a wired or wireless communication network, a network such as the Internet, data broadcasting, or the like. 
     (7) In addition, the present disclosure may also be realized by a computer system including a microprocessor and a memory. The memory stores the computer program, and the microprocessor operates in accordance with the computer program. 
     (8) In addition, the present disclosure may also be carried out by another independent computer system by storing and transporting a program or a digital signal on a recording medium, or transporting the program or the digital signal over a network or the like. 
     The embodiments of the present disclosure can be used in systems of onboard cameras that are mounted in vehicles for automated driving, Controller Area Network (CAN), and the like and in information processing apparatuses or systems for assisting driving.