Patent Publication Number: US-6911589-B2

Title: Rice cultivar M-206

Description:
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates to a new and distinctive rice cultivar, designated M-206. Rice is an ancient agricultural crop and is today one of the principal food crops of the world. There are two cultivated species of rice:  Oryza sativa  L., the Asian rice, and  O. glaberrima  Steud., the African rice.  O. sativa  L. constitutes virtually all of the world&#39;s cultivated rice and is the species grown in the United States. Three major rice producing regions exist in the United States: the Mississippi Delta (Arkansas, Mississippi, northeast Louisiana, southeast Missouri), the Gulf Coast (southwest Louisiana, southeast Texas), and the Central Valleys of California. 
     Rice is a semiaquatic crop that benefits from flooded soil conditions during part or all of the growing season. In the United States, rice is grown on flooded soils to optimize grain yields. Heavy clay soils or silt loam soils with hard pan layers about 30 cm below the surface are typical rice-producing soils because they minimize water losses from soil percolation. Rice production in the United States can be broadly categorized as either dry-seeded or water-seeded. In the dry-seeded system, rice is sown into a well-prepared seed bed with a grain drill or by broadcasting the seed and incorporating it with a disk or harrow. Moisture for seed germination is from irrigation or rainfall. Another method of planting by the dry-seeded system is to broadcast the seed by airplane into a flooded field, then promptly drain the water from the field. For the dry-seeded system, when the plants have reached sufficient size (four- to five-leaf stage), a shallow permanent flood of water 5 to 16 cm deep is applied to the field for the remainder of the crop season. 
     In the water-seeded system, rice seed is soaked for 12 to 36 hours to initiate germination, and the seed is broadcast by airplane into a flooded field. The seedlings emerge through a shallow flood, or the water may be drained from the field for a short period of time to enhance seedling establishment. A shallow flood is maintained until the rice approaches maturity. For both the dry-seeded and water-seeded production systems, the fields are drained when the crop is mature, and the rice is harvested 2 to 3 weeks later with large combines. In rice breeding programs, breeders try to employ the production systems predominant in their respective region. Thus, a drill-seeded breeding nursery is used by breeders in a region where rice is drill-seeded and a water-seeded nursery is used in regions where water-seeding is important. 
     Rice in the United States is classified into three primary market types by grain size, shape, and chemical composition of the endosperm: long-grain, medium grain and short-grain. Typical U.S. long-grain cultivars cook dry and fluffy when steamed or boiled, whereas medium- and short-grain cultivars cook moist and sticky. Long-grain cultivars have been traditionally grown in the southern states and generally receive higher market prices. 
     Although specific breeding objectives vary somewhat in the different regions, increasing yield is a primary objective in all programs. Grain yield of rice is determined by the number of panicles per unit area, the number of fertile florets per panicle, and grain weight per floret. Increases in any or all of these yield components may provide a mechanism to obtain higher yields. Heritable variation exists for all of these components, and breeders may directly or indirectly select for increases in any of them. 
     There are numerous steps in the development of any novel, desirable plant germplasm. Plant breeding begins with the analysis and definition of problems and weaknesses of the current germplasm, the establishment of program goals, and the definition of specific breeding objectives. The next step is selection of germplasm that possess the traits to meet the program goals. The goal is to combine in a single variety an improved combination of desirable traits from the parental germplasm. These important traits may include higher seed yield, resistance to diseases and insects, better stems and roots, tolerance to low temperatures, and better agronomic characteristics on grain quality. 
     Choice of breeding or selection methods depends on the mode of plant reproduction, the heritability of the trait(s) being improved, and the type of cultivar used commercially (e.g., F 1  hybrid cultivar, pureline cultivar, etc.). For highly heritable traits, a choice of superior individual plants evaluated at a single location will be effective, whereas for traits with low heritability, selection should be based on mean values obtained from replicated evaluations of families of related plants. Popular selection methods commonly include pedigree selection, modified pedigree selection, mass selection, and recurrent selection, or a combination of these methods. 
     The complexity of inheritance influences choice of the breeding method. Backcross breeding is used to transfer one or a few favorable genes for a highly heritable trait into a desirable cultivar. This approach has been used extensively for breeding disease-resistant cultivars. Various recurrent selection techniques are used to improve quantitatively inherited traits controlled by numerous genes. The use of recurrent selection in self-pollinating crops depends on the ease of pollination, the frequency of successful hybrids from each pollination, and the number of hybrid offspring from each successful cross. 
     Each breeding program should include a periodic, objective evaluation of the efficiency of the breeding procedure. Evaluation criteria vary depending on the goal and objectives, but should include gain from selection per year based on comparisons to an appropriate standard, overall value of the advanced breeding lines, and number of successful cultivars produced per unit of input (e.g., per year, per dollar expended, etc.). 
     Promising advanced breeding lines are thoroughly tested and compared to appropriate standards in environments representative of the commercial target area(s) for three or more years. The best lines are candidates for new commercial cultivars; those still deficient in a few traits may be used as parents to produce new populations for further selection. 
     These processes, which lead to the final step of marketing and distribution, usually take from eight to 12 years from the time the first cross is made and may rely on the development of improved breeding lines as precursors. Therefore, development of new cultivars is a time-consuming process that requires precise forward planning, efficient use of resources, and a minimum of changes in direction. 
     A most difficult task is the identification of individuals that are genetically superior, because for most traits the true genotypic value is masked by other confounding plant traits or environmental factors. One method of identifying a superior plant is to observe its performance relative to other experimental plants and to a widely grown standard cultivar. If a single observation is inconclusive, replicated observations provide a better estimate of its genetic worth. 
     The goal of plant breeding is to develop new, unique and superior rice cultivars and hybrids. The breeder initially selects and crosses two or more parental lines, followed by self pollination and selection, producing many new genetic combinations. The breeder can theoretically generate billions of different genetic combinations via crossing, selfing and mutations. The breeder has no direct control at the cellular level. Therefore, two breeders will never develop the same line, or even very similar lines, having the same rice traits. 
     Each year, the plant breeder selects the germplasm to advance to the next generation. This germplasm is grown under unique and different geographical, climatic and soil conditions, and further selections are then made, during and at the end of the growing season. The cultivars which are developed are unpredictable. This unpredictability is because the breeder&#39;s selection occurs in unique environments, with no control at the DNA level (using conventional breeding procedures), and with millions of different possible genetic combinations being generated. A breeder of ordinary skill in the art cannot predict the final resulting lines he develops, except possibly in a very gross and general fashion. The same breeder cannot produce the same cultivar twice by using the exact same original parents and the same selection techniques. This unpredictability results in the expenditure of large amounts of research monies to develop superior new rice cultivars. 
     The development of new rice cultivars requires the development and selection of rice varieties, the crossing of these varieties and selection of superior hybrid crosses. The hybrid seed is produced by manual crosses between selected male-fertile parents or by using male sterility systems. These hybrids are selected for certain single gene traits such as semidwarf plant type, pubescence, awns, and apiculus color which indicate that the seed is truly a hybrid. Additional data on parental lines, as well as the phenotype of the hybrid, influence the breeder&#39;s decision whether to continue with the specific hybrid cross. 
     Pedigree breeding and recurrent selection breeding methods are used to develop cultivars from breeding populations. Breeding programs combine desirable traits from two or more cultivars or various broad-based sources into breeding pools from which cultivars are developed by selfing and selection of desired phenotypes. The new cultivars are evaluated to determine which have commercial potential. 
     Pedigree breeding is used commonly for the improvement of self-pollinating crops. Two parents which possess favorable, complementary traits are crossed to produce an F 1 . An F 2  population is produced by selfing one or several F 1 &#39;s. Selection of the best individuals may begin in the F 2  population; then, beginning in the F 3 , the best individuals in the best families are selected. Replicated testing of families can begin in the F 4  generation to improve the effectiveness of selection for traits with low heritability. At an advanced stage of inbreeding (i.e., F 6  and F 7 ), the best lines or mixtures of phenotypically similar lines are tested for potential release as new cultivars. 
     Mass and recurrent selections can be used to improve populations of either self- or cross-pollinating crops. A genetically variable population of heterozygous individuals is either identified or created by intercrossing several different parents. The best plants are selected based on individual superiority, outstanding progeny, or excellent combining ability. The selected plants are intercrossed to produce a new population in which further cycles of selection are continued. 
     Backcross breeding has been used to transfer genes for a simply inherited, highly heritable trait into a desirable homozygous cultivar or inbred line which is the recurrent parent. The source of the trait to be transferred is called the donor parent. The resulting plant is expected to have the attributes of the recurrent parent (e.g., cultivar) and the desirable trait transferred from the donor parent. After the initial cross, individuals possessing the phenotype of the donor parent are selected and repeatedly crossed (backcrossed) to the recurrent parent. The resulting plant is expected to have the attributes of the recurrent parent (e.g., cultivar) and the desirable trait transferred from the donor parent. 
     The single-seed descent procedure in the strict sense refers to planting a segregating population, harvesting a sample of one seed per plant, and using the one-seed sample to plant the next generation. When the population has been advanced from the F 2  to the desired level of inbreeding, the plants from which lines are derived will each trace to different F 2  individuals. The number of plants in a population declines each generation due to failure of some seeds to germinate or some plants to produce at least one seed. As a result, not all of the F 2  plants originally sampled in the population will be represented by a progeny when generation advance is completed. 
     In a multiple-seed procedure, rice breeders commonly harvest one or more seeds from each plant in a population and thresh them together to form a bulk. Part of the bulk is used to plant the next generation and part is put in reserve. The procedure has been referred to as modified single-seed descent or the pod-bulk technique. 
     The multiple-seed procedure has been used to save labor at harvest. It is considerably faster to thresh panicles with a machine than to remove one seed from each by hand for the single-seed procedure. The multiple-seed procedure also makes it possible to plant the same number of seeds of a population each generation of inbreeding. Enough seeds are harvested to make up for those plants that did not germinate or produce seed. 
     Descriptions of other breeding methods that are commonly used for different traits and crops can be found in one of several reference books (e.g., Allard, 1960; Simmonds, 1979; Sneep et al., 1979; Fehr, 1987). 
     Proper testing should detect any major faults and establish the level of superiority or improvement over current cultivars. In addition to showing superior performance, there must be a demand for a new cultivar that is compatible with industry standards or which creates a new market. The introduction of a new cultivar will incur additional costs to the seed producer, the grower, processor and consumer; for special advertising and marketing, altered seed and commercial production practices, and new product utilization. The testing preceding release of a new cultivar should take into consideration research and development costs as well as technical superiority of the final cultivar. For seed-propagated cultivars, it must be feasible to produce seed easily and economically. 
     Rice,  Oryza sativa  L., is an important and valuable field crop. Thus, a continuing goal of plant breeders is to develop stable, high yielding rice cultivars that are agronomically sound. The reasons for this goal are obviously to maximize the amount of grain produced on the land used and to supply food for both animals and humans. To accomplish this goal, the rice breeder must select and develop rice plants that have the traits that result in superior cultivars. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     According to the invention, there is provided a novel rice cultivar, designated M-206. This invention thus relates to the seeds of rice cultivar M-206, to the plants of rice M-206 and to methods for producing a rice plant produced by crossing the rice M-206 with itself or another rice line. 
     Thus, any such methods using the rice variety M-206 are part of this invention: selfing, backcrosses, hybrid production, crosses to populations, and the like. All plants produced using rice variety M-206 as a parent are within the scope of this invention. Advantageously, the rice variety could be used in crosses with other, different, rice plants to produce first generation (F 1 ) rice hybrid seeds and plants with superior characteristics. 
     In another aspect, the present invention provides for single gene converted plants of M-206. The single transferred gene may preferably be a dominant or recessive allele. Preferably, the single transferred gene will confer such traits as herbicide resistance, insect resistance, resistance for bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, male fertility, male sterility, enhanced nutritional quality, and industrial usage. The single gene may be a naturally occurring rice gene or a transgene introduced through genetic engineering techniques. 
     In another aspect, the present invention provides regenerable cells for use in tissue culture of rice plant M-206. The tissue culture will preferably be capable of regenerating plants having the physiological and morphological characteristics of the foregoing rice plant, and of regenerating plants having substantially the same genotype as the foregoing rice plant. Preferably, the regenerable cells in such tissue cultures will be embryos, protoplasts, meristematic cells, callus, pollen, leaves, anthers, root tips, flowers, seeds, panicles or stems. Still further, the present invention provides rice plants regenerated from the tissue cultures of the invention. 
     DEFINITIONS 
     In the description and tables which follow, a number of terms are used. In order to provide a clear and consistent understanding of the specification and claims, including the scope to be given such terms, the following definitions are provided: 
     Days to 50% heading. Average number of days from seeding to the day when 50% of all panicles are exerted at least partially through the leaf sheath. A measure of maturity. 
     Grain Yield. Grain yield is measured in pounds per acre and at 14.0% moisture. Grain yield of rice is determined by the number of panicles per unit area, the number of fertile florets per panicle, and grain weight per floret. 
     Lodging Percent. Lodging is measured as a subjective rating and is percentage of the plant stems leaning or fallen completely to the ground before harvest. 
     Grain Length (L). Length of a rice grain is measured in millimeters. 
     Grain Width (W). Width of a rice grain is measured in millimeters. 
     Length/Width (L/W) Ratio. This ratio is determined by dividing the average length (L) by the average width (W). 
     1000 Grain Wt. The weight of 1000 rice grains as measured in grams. 
     Harvest Moisture. The percent of moisture of the grain when harvested. 
     Plant Height. Plant height in centimeters is taken from soil surface to the tip of the extended panicle at harvest. 
     Apparent Amylose Percent. The most important grain characteristic that describes cooking behavior in each grain class, or type, i.e., long, medium, and short grain. The percentage of the endosperm starch of milled rice that is amylose. Standard long grains contain 20 to 23% amylose. Rexmont type long grains contain 24 to 25% amylose. Short and medium grains contain 16 to 19% amylose. Waxy rice contains 0% amylose. Amylose values will vary over environments. 
     Alkali Spreading Value Indicator of gelatinization temperature and an index that measures the extent of disintegration of milled rice kernel in contact with dilute alkali solution. Standard medium grains have 6 to 7 Alkali Spreading Value (intermediate gelatinization temperature). 
     RVA Viscosity. Rapid Visco Analyzer is a new and widely used laboratory instrument to examine paste viscosity, or thickening ability of milled rice during the cooking process. 
     Hot Paste Viscosity. Viscosity measure of rice flour/water slurry after being heated to 95° C. Lower values indicate softer and more sticky cooking types of rice. 
     Cool Paste Viscosity. Viscosity measure of rice flour/water slurry after being heated to 95° C. and uniformly cooled to 50° C. (American Association of Cereal Chemist). Values less than 200 for cool paste indicate softer cooking types of rice. 
     Allele. Allele is any of one or more alternative forms of a gene, all of which alleles relate to one trait or characteristic. In a diploid cell or organism, the two alleles of a given gene occupy corresponding loci on a pair of homologous chromosomes. 
     Backcrossing. Backcrossing is a process in which a breeder repeatedly crosses hybrid progeny back to one of the parents, for example, a first generation hybrid F 1  with one of the parental genotypes of the F 1  hybrid. 
     Essentially all the physiological and morphological characteristics. A plant having essentially all the physiological and morphological characteristics means a plant having the physiological and morphological characteristics, except for the characteristics derived from the converted gene. 
     Quantitative Trait Loci (QTL). Quantitative trait loci (QTL) refer to genetic loci that control to some degree numerically representable traits that are usually continuously distributed. 
     Regeneration. Regeneration refers to the development of a plant from tissue culture. 
     Single Gene Converted (Conversion). Single gene converted (conversion) plant refers to plants which are developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of a variety are recovered in addition to the single gene transferred into the variety via the backcrossing technique or via genetic engineering. 
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     M-206 is a very early to early, semidwarf, medium-grain experimental line that has been evaluated in large plot yield tests since 1998. It was tested under the experimental designation 98-Y-242. It is an early selection from the 1991-1992 winter greenhouse cross R18087 and has the pedigree S-301/M204. M-206 was developed by the California Cooperative Rice Research Foundation (CCRRF) at the Rice Experiment Station (RES), Biggs, Calif. Both cultivars used in the pedigree were developed by the California Cooperative Rice Research Foundation, (CCRRF) at the Rice Experiment Station (RES), Biggs, Calif. S-301 is an intermediate maturity short-grain semidwarf that is no longer in production. M-204 is an early maturing Calrose medium-grain with semidwarf height. M-206 is the product of modified pedigree breeding. Early spray painted panicle selections from the 1993 F 2  nursery selected for medium grain shape were bulked 6 panicles per row in the 1993-94 Hawaiian nursery. Panicle selections grouped from the R18087 Hawaii rows were planted in 1994 individual rows. The line of descent from was 94 row 63811 via individual panicle selection to 95 row 6309 to 96 row 5136 which was bulked for 97 small plot 351 that was the seed source for entry 98-Y-242 in the RES Preliminary Yield T est. It has been tested in the University of California Cooperative Extension (UCCE) Statewide Yield Tests (99-Y-84, 00-Y-63, 01-Y-12, 01-Y-72, 02-Y-11, 02-Y-73) 1999 to 2002. 
     Panicle selections were first taken for headrow production in 1999 and continued through 2002. The 1999 panicles were initially purified in the 2000 headrow nursery. Year 2000 selected headrows were generation advanced in 2000-01 Hawaiian nursery. Year 2001 breeder headrows totaled 300 rows from 2000 selected headrows and their descendents from 2001-02 Hawaii nursery. The year 2001 breeder increase consisted of two components. One component was derived from bulked year 2000 headrows while the other came from the 2000-01 Hawaii nursery. These bulks were harvested separately and planted in different foundation field locations in 2002 for a total of 7.7 acres. Previous experience revealed that in certain years more outcrossing occurs in the Hawaii nursery resulting in more offtypes in either the breeder and/or foundation production fields. Two years of observations and plant counts demonstrated that 2000-01 outcrossing in Hawaii was near non-existent resulting in the two components being combined for the planting and production of 2002 Foundation seed. The 2001 headrow panicle selections were used to plant 400 headrows in 2002. 
     During the headrow production any putative segregating or variant rows were removed from the field. Visual inspection (seedling vigor, heading date, plant height, grain shape and size, etc.) of headrows were used as criteria to confirm cultivar purity. This is standard procedure at RES to monitor and maintain breeder seed of the 13 currently grown California rice varieties. M-206 was approved for certification by the California Crop Improvement Association in 2003. Classes of seed will be breeder, foundation, registered, and certified seed produced in California. Foundation seed can be used to produce foundation seed if necessary and headrow and breeder seed will be produced in foundation fields as necessary to maintain cultivar purity. 
     M-206 has been observed in seed increase and production fields for five generations (1999 to 2002) and found to be uniform and stable, as described in the following variety description information. It has been increased with continued observation for uniformity. 
     Rice cultivar M-206 has the following morphologic and other characteristics (based primarily on data collected at Biggs, Calif.). 
     Variety Description Information 
     Maturity (Biggs, Calif. at 135 kg N/ha) 
     Days to maturity: 79 
     5 days earlier than M-202 
     Culm (Degrees from Perpendicular After Flowering) 
     Angle: Erect (less than 30°) 
     Length: 96.6 cm (Soil level to top of extended panicle on main stem) 
     Shorter than M-202 by 3.0 cm 
     Height Class: Semi-dwarf 
     Internode Color (After flowering): Green 
     Strength (Lodging resistance): Moderately strong (most plants leaning) 
     Flag Leaf (After Heading) 
     Length: 39.4 cm 
     Width: 12.2 mm 
     Pubescence: Glabrous 
     Leaf Angle (after heading): Erect 
     Blade Color: Green 
     Basal Leaf Sheath Color: Green 
     Ligule 
     Color (Late vegetative state): White 
     Shape: Acute to acuminate 
     Collar Color (Late vegetative stage) : Pale green 
     Auricle Color (Late vegetative stage) : Pale green 
     Panicle 
     Length: 19.8 cm 
     Type: Intermediate 
     Secondary Branching: Light 
     Exsertion (near maturity) : 100% 
     Axis: Droopy 
     Shattering: Very low (1%) 
     Threshability: Easy 
     Grain (Spikelet) 
     Awns (After full heading) : Short and partly awned 
     Apiculus Color (At maturity) : Straw 
     Stigma Color: White 
     Lemma and Palea Color (At maturity) : Straw 
     Lemma and Palea Pubescence: Glabrous, with hair on lemma keel 
     Spikelet Sterility (At maturity) : Highly fertile (&gt;90%) 
     Grain (Seed) 
     Seed Coat Color: Light brown 
     Endosperm Type: Nonglutinous (nonwaxy) 
     Endosperm Translucency: Clear 
     Endosperm Chalkiness: Small (less than 10% of sample) 
     Scent: Nonscented 
     Shape Class (Length/width ratio):
         Paddy—Medium (2.3:1 to 3.3:1)   Brown—Medium (2.1:1 to 3.0:1)   Milled—Medium (2.0:1 to 2.9:1)       

     
       
         
           
               
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Measurements: (2001-2002 average) 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                   
                 Length 
                 Width 
                 L/W 
                 1000 Grains 
               
               
                   
                   
                 (mm) 
                 (mm) 
                 Ratio 
                 (grams) 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Paddy 
                 8.46 
                 3.15 
                 2.7 
                 29.4 
               
               
                   
                 Brown 
                 6.20 
                 2.78 
                 2.3 
                 24.0 
               
               
                   
                 Milled 
                 5.84 
                 2.71 
                 2.2 
                 20.7 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Milling Yield (% whole kernel (head) rice to rough rice) : 66.0 
     Brown Rice Protein (Leco): 6.9% 
     Apparent Amylose: 18.0% 
     Alkali Spreading value: 6.0 ( 1.5% KOH Solution) 6.4% (1.7% KOH Solution) 
     Gelatinization Temperature (Differential Scanning Calorimetry) 68.4° C. 
     Gelatinization Temperature Type: Low 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                   
               
               
                 Amylographic Paste Viscosity 
               
               
                 (Rapid Visco Amylograph AACC Method - RVU) 
               
               
                   
               
             
            
               
                   
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Peak 
                 288 
               
               
                   
                 Hot Paste 
                 150 
               
               
                   
                 Cooled Paste 
                 253 
               
               
                   
                 Consistency 
                 104 
               
               
                   
                 Breakdown 
                 139 
               
               
                   
                 Pasting Temperature: 
                  71.5° C. 
               
               
                   
                   
               
            
           
         
       
     
     Resistance to Low Temperature 
     Germination and Seedling Vigor: High 
     Flowering (Spikelet fertility) : High 
     Seedling Vigor Not Related to Low Temperature 
     Vigor: High 
     Disease Resistance 
     Aggregate Sheath Spot  Rhizoctonia oryzae - sativae : Mod. Susceptible 
     Stem Rot  Sclerotium oryzae : Mod. Susceptible 
     Blast Resistance  Pyrisclaria oryzae  race IG1: Susceptible 
     Insect Resistance 
     Rice Water Weevil  Lissorhoptrus oryzophilus : Susceptible 
     This invention is also directed to methods for producing a rice plant by crossing a first parent rice plant with a second parent rice plant, wherein the first or second rice plant is the rice plant from the line M-206. Further, both first and second parent rice plants may be from the cultivar M-206. Therefore, any methods using the cultivar M-206 are part of this invention: selfing, backcrosses, hybrid breeding, and crosses to populations. Any plants produced using cultivar M-206 as a parent are within the scope of this invention. 
     As used herein, the term “plant” includes plant cells, plant protoplasts, plant cells of tissue culture from which rice plants can be regenerated, plant calli, plant clumps, and plant cells that are intact in plants or parts of plants, such as pollen, flowers, embryos, ovules, seeds, pods, leaves, stems, anthers and the like. Thus, another aspect of this invention is to provide for cells which upon growth and differentiation produce a cultivar having essentially all of the physiological and morphological characteristics of M-104. 
     Culture for expressing desired structural genes and cultured cells are known in the art. Also as known in the art, rices are transformable and regenerable such that whole plants containing and expressing desired genes under regulatory control may be obtained. General descriptions of plant expression vectors and reporter genes and transformation protocols can be found in Gruber, et al., “Vectors for Plant Transformation, in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology &amp; Biotechnology” in Glich, et al., (Eds. pp. 89-119, CRC Press, 1993). Moreover GUS expression vectors and GUS gene cassettes a re available from Clone Tech Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, Calif. while luciferase expression vectors and luciferase gene cassettes are available from Pro Mega Corp. (Madison, Wis.). General methods of culturing plant tissues are provided for example by Maki, et al., “Procedures for Introducing Foreign DNA into Plants” in Methods in Plant Molecular Biology &amp; Biotechnology, Glich, et al., (Eds. pp. 67-88 CRC Press, 1993); and by Phillips, et al., “Cell-Tissue Culture and In-Vitro Manipulation” in Corn &amp; Corn Improvement, 3rd Edition; Sprague, et al., (Eds. pp. 345-387) American Society of Agronomy Inc., 1988. Methods of introducing expression vectors into plant tissue include the direct infection or co-cultivation of plant cells with  Agrobacterium tumefaciens , Horsch et al., Science, 227:1229 (1985). Descriptions of  Agrobacterium  vectors systems and methods for  Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer provided by Gruber, et al., supra. 
     Useful methods include but are not limited to expression vectors introduced into plant tissues using a direct gene transfer method such as microprojectile-mediated delivery, DNA injection, electroporation and the like. More preferably expression vectors are introduced into plant tissues using the microprojectile media delivery with the biolistic device  Agrobacterium -medicated transformation. Transformant plants obtained with the protoplasm of the invention are intended to be within the scope of this invention. 
     The present invention contemplates a rice plant regenerated from a tissue culture of a variety (e.g., M-206) or hybrid plant of the present invention. As is well known in the art, tissue culture of rice can be used for the in vitro regeneration of a rice plant. Tissue culture of various tissues of rices and regeneration of plants therefrom is well known and widely published. For example, reference may be had to Chu, Q. R., et al., (1999) “Use of bridging parents with high anther culturability to improve plant regeneration and breeding value in rice”, Rice Biotechnology Quarterly 38:25-26; Chu, Q. R., et al., (1998), “A novel plant regeneration medium for rice anther culture of Southern U.S. crosses”, Rice Biotechnology Quarterly 35:15-16; Chu, Q. R., et al., (1997), “A novel basal medium for embryogenic callus induction of Souther US crosses”, Rice Biotechnology Quarterly 32:19-20; and Oono, K., “Broadening the Genetic Variability By Tissue Culture Methods”, Jap. J. Breed. 33 (Suppl.2), 306-307, illus. 1983, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated herein in their entirety by reference. Thus, another aspect of this invention is to provide cells which upon growth and differentiation produce rice plants having the physiological and morphological characteristics of variety M-206. 
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 1 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Agronomic characteristics and performance of M-206 and 
               
               
                 M-202 - 1998 to 2002 UCCE Statewide Yield Tests 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Character 
                 M-206 
                 M-202 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Seedling vigor (score)† 
                   4.5 
                   4.6 
               
               
                   
                 Days 50% heading 
                  85* 
                  89 
               
               
                   
                 Plant height (cm) 
                  95 
                  97 
               
               
                   
                 Lodging (%) 
                  31 
                  38 
               
               
                   
                 Blanking - Greenhouse (%) 
                  12 
                  25 
               
               
                   
                 Blanking - Davis (%) 
                  12 
                  16 
               
               
                   
                 Blanking - San Joaquin (%) 
                   7 
                  27 
               
               
                   
                 Overall blanking mean (%) 
                  10 
                  23 
               
               
                   
                 Stem rot (score) 
                   5.4 
                   5.5 
               
               
                   
                 Harvest moisture (%) 
                  19.8 
                  19.7 
               
               
                   
                 Yield (lb/acre @ 14%) 
                 9350* 
                 9060 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 †Seedling vigor visual score where 1 = poor and 5 = excellent.  
               
               
                   
                 *Significantly different at the 0.05 probability level.  
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 2 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Milling yields of M-202 and M-206 - 1998 to 2002 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Character 
                 M-206 
                 M-202 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Total milled rice (%) 
                 69.0 
                 68.7 
               
               
                   
                 Whole kernel milled rice (%) 
                 66.0 
                 64.2 
               
               
                   
                 Number of samples† 
                 51 
                 30 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 †Moisture samples outside the 17-25% range were removed from the calculation.  
               
            
           
         
       
     
     
       
         
           
               
             
               
                 TABLE 3 
               
             
            
               
                   
               
               
                 Agronomic Characteristics for M-206 and M-202 
               
               
                 at cold location (UCCE @ San Joaquin County) 
               
               
                 2001-2002 
               
            
           
           
               
               
               
               
            
               
                   
                 Character 
                 M-206 
                 M-202 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 Seedling vigor (score) 
                   4.6 
                   4.7 
               
               
                   
                 Days 50% heading 
                  97 
                  98 
               
               
                   
                 Plant height (cm) 
                  86 
                  83 
               
               
                   
                 Lodging (%) 
                   1 
                   1 
               
               
                   
                 Harvest moisture (%) 
                  23.9 
                  24.0 
               
               
                   
                 Yield (lb/acre @ 14%) 
                 8590* 
                 7880 
               
               
                   
                   
               
               
                   
                 †Seedling vigor visual score where 1 = poor and 5 = excellent.  
               
               
                   
                 *Significantly different at the 0.05 probability level.  
               
            
           
         
       
     
     When the term rice plant is used in the context of the present invention, this also includes any single gene conversions of that variety. The term single gene converted plant as used herein refers to those rice plants which are developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing or via genetic engineering techniques wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of a variety are recovered in addition to the single gene transferred into the variety via the backcrossing technique or via genetic engineering. Backcrossing methods can be used with the present invention to improve or introduce a characteristic into the variety. The term backcrossing as used herein refers to the repeated crossing of a hybrid progeny back to the recurrent parent. The parental rice plant which contributes the gene for the desired characteristic is termed the nonrecurrent or donor parent. This terminology refers to the fact that the nonrecurrent parent is used one time in the backcross protocol and therefore does not recur. The parental rice plant to which the gene or genes from the nonrecurrent parent are transferred is known as the recurrent parent as it is used for several rounds in the backcrossing protocol (Poehlman &amp; Sleper, 1994; Fehr, 1987). In a typical backcross protocol, the original variety of interest (recurrent parent) is crossed to a second variety (nonrecurrent parent) that carries the single gene of interest to be transferred. The resulting progeny from this cross are then crossed again to the recurrent parent and the process is repeated until a rice plant is obtained wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of the recurrent parent are recovered in the converted plant, in addition to the single transferred gene from the nonrecurrent parent. 
     The selection of a suitable recurrent parent is an important step for a successful backcrossing procedure. The goal of a backcross protocol is to alter or substitute a single trait or characteristic in the original variety. To accomplish this, a single gene of the recurrent variety is modified or substituted with the desired gene from the nonrecurrent parent, while retaining essentially all of the rest of the desired genetic, and therefore the desired physiological and morphological, constitution of the original variety. The choice of the particular nonrecurrent parent will depend on the purpose of the backcross, one of the major purposes is to add some commercially desirable, agronomically important trait to the plant. The exact backcrossing protocol will depend on the characteristic or trait being altered to determine an appropriate testing protocol. Although backcrossing methods are simplified when the characteristic being transferred is a dominant allele, a recessive allele may also be transferred. In this instance it may be necessary to introduce a test of the progeny to determine if the desired characteristic has been successfully transferred. 
     Many single gene traits have been identified that are not regularly selected for in the development of a new variety but that can be improved by backcrossing techniques. Single gene traits may or may not be transgenic, examples of these traits include but are not limited to, male sterility, herbicide resistance, resistance for bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, insect resistance, male fertility, enhanced nutritional quality, industrial usage, yield stability and yield enhancement. These genes are generally inherited through the nucleus. 
     Further Embodiments of the Invention 
     This invention also is directed to methods for producing a rice plant by crossing a first parent rice plant with a second parent rice plant wherein either the first or second parent rice plant is a hybrid rice plant M-206. Further, both first and second parent rice plants can come from the hybrid rice M-206. Still further, this invention also is directed to methods for producing a hybrid rice line M-206-derived rice plant by crossing hybrid rice line M-206 with a second rice plant and growing the progeny seed, and repeating the crossing and growing steps with the hybrid rice line M-206-derived plant from 0 to 7 times. Thus, any such methods using the hybrid rice line M-206 are part of this invention: selfing, backcrosses, hybrid production, crosses to populations, and the like. All plants produced using hybrid rice line M-206 as a parent are within the scope of this invention, including plants derived from hybrid rice line M-206. 
     It should be understood that the parents of hybrid M-206 can, through routine manipulation of cytoplasmic or other factors, be produced in a male-sterile form. Such embodiments are also contemplated within the scope of the present claims. 
     As used herein, the term plant includes plant cells, plant protoplasts, plant cell tissue cultures from which rice plants can be regenerated, plant calli, plant clumps and plant cells that are intact in plants or parts of plants, such as embryos, pollen, ovules, flowers, kernels, panicles, hulls, leaves, glumes, stems, roots, root tips, anthers, pistils, styles and the like. 
     Duncan, et al.,  Planta  165:322-332 (1985) reflects that 97% of the plants cultured that produced callus were capable of plant regeneration. Subsequent experiments with both inbreds and hybrids produced 91% regenerable callus that produced plants. In a further study in 1988, Songstad, et al.,  Plant Cell Reports  7:262-265 (1988), reports several media additions that enhance regenerability of callus of two inbred lines. Other published reports also indicated that “nontraditional” tissues are capable of producing somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration. K. P. Rao et al.,  Maize Genetics Cooperation Newsletter , 60:64-65 (1986), refers to somatic embryogenesis from glume callus cultures and B. V. Conger, et al.,  Plant Cell Reports , 6:345-347 (1987) indicates somatic embryogenesis from the tissue cultures of corn leaf segments. Thus, it is clear from the literature that the state of the art is such that these methods of obtaining plants are, and were, “conventional” in the sense that they are routinely used and have a very high rate of success. 
     Tissue culture of corn is described in European Patent Application, publication 160,390, incorporated herein by reference. Corn tissue culture procedures are also described in Green and Rhodes, “Plant Regeneration in Tissue Culture of Maize,”  Maize for Biological Research  (Plant Molecular Biology Association, Charlottesville, Va. 367-372, (1982)) and in Duncan et al., “The Production of Callus Capable of Plant Regeneration from Immature Embryos of Numerous  Zea Mays  Genotypes,” 165  Planta  322:332 (1985). Thus, another aspect of this invention is to provide cells which upon growth and differentiation produce rice plants having the physiological and morphological characteristics of hybrid rice line M-206. 
     The utility of hybrid rice line M-206 also extends to crosses with other species. Commonly, suitable species will be of the family Graminaceae, and especially of the genera Zea, Tripsacum, Croix, Schlerachne, Polytoca, Chionachne, and Trilobachne, of the tribe Maydeae. Potentially suitable for crosses with M-206 may be the various varieties of grain sorghum,  Sorghum bicolor  (L.) Moench. 
     With the advent of molecular biological techniques that have allowed the isolation and characterization of genes that encode specific protein products, scientists in the field of plant biology developed a strong interest in engineering the genome of plants to contain and express foreign genes, or additional, or modified versions of native, or endogenous, genes (perhaps driven by different promoters) in order to alter the traits of a plant in a specific manner. Such foreign additional and/or modified genes are referred to herein collectively as “transgenes”. Over the last fifteen to twenty years several methods for producing transgenic plants have been developed, and the present invention, in particular embodiments, also relates to transformed versions of the claimed hybrid. 
     Plant transformation involves the construction of an expression vector which will function in plant cells. Such a vector comprises DNA comprising a gene under control of or operatively linked to a regulatory element (for example, a promoter). The expression vector may contain one or more such operably linked gene/regulatory element combinations. The vector(s) may be in the form of a plasmid, and can be used alone or in combination with other plasmids, to provide transformed rice plants, using transformation methods as described below to incorporate transgenes into the genetic material of the rice plant(s). 
     Expression Vectors for Corn Transformation 
     Marker Genes—Expression vectors include at least one genetic marker, operably linked to a regulatory element (a promoter, for example) that allows transformed cells containing the marker to be either recovered by negative selection, i.e., inhibiting growth of cells that do not contain the selectable marker gene, or by positive selection, i.e., screening for the product encoded by the genetic marker. Many commonly used selectable marker genes for plant transformation are well known in the transformation arts, and include, for example, genes that code for enzymes that metabolically detoxify a selective chemical agent which may be an antibiotic or a herbicide, or genes that encode an altered target which is insensitive to the inhibitor. A few positive selection methods are also known in the art. 
     One commonly used selectable marker gene for plant transformation is the neomycin phosphotransferase II (nptII) gene, isolated from transposon Tn5, which when placed under the control of plant regulatory signals confers resistance to kanamycin. Fraley et al.,  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A ., 80:4803 (1983). Another commonly used selectable marker gene is the hygromycin phosphotransferase gene which confers resistance to the antibiotic hygromycin. Vanden Elzen et al.,  Plant Mol. Biol ., 5:299 (1985). 
     Additional selectable marker genes of bacterial origin that confer resistance to antibiotics include gentamycin acetyl transferase, streptomycin phosphotransferase, aminoglycoside-3′-adenyl transferase, the bleomycin resistance determinant. Hayford et al.,  Plant Physiol . 86:1216 (1988), Jones et al.,  Mol. Gen. Genet ., 210:86 (1987), Svab et al.,  Plant Mol. Biol . 14:197 (1990&lt;Hille et al.,  Plant Mol. Biol . 7:171 (1986). Other selectable marker genes confer resistance to herbicides such as glyphosate, glufosinate or broxynil. Comai et al.,  Nature  317:741-744 (1985), Gordon-Kamm et al.,  Plant Cell  2:603-618 (1990) and Stalker et al.,  Science  242:419-423 (1988). 
     Other selectable marker genes for plant transformation are not of bacterial origin. These genes include, for example, mouse dihydrofolate reductase, plant 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase and plant acetolactate synthase. Eichholtz et al.,  Somatic Cell Mol. Genet . 13:67 (1987), Shah et al.,  Science  233:478 (1986), Charest et al.,  Plant Cell Rep . 8:643 (1990). 
     Another class of marker genes for plant transformation require screening of presumptively transformed plant cells rather than direct genetic selection of transformed cells for resistance to a toxic substance such as an antibiotic. These genes are particularly useful to quantify or visualize the spatial pattern of expression of a gene in specific tissues and are frequently referred to as reporter genes because they can be fused to a gene or gene regulatory sequence for the investigation of gene expression. Commonly used genes for screening presumptively transformed cells include -glucuronidase (GUS, -galactosidase, luciferase and chloramphenicol, acetyltransferase. Jefferson, R. A.,  Plant Mol. Biol. Rep . 5:387 (1987), Teeri et al.,  EMBO J . 8:343 (1989), Koncz et al.,  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci U.S.A . 84:131 (1987), DeBlock et al.,  EMBO J . 3:1681 (1984). Another approach to the identification of relatively rare transformation events has been use of a gene that encodes a dominant constitutive regulator of the  Zea mays  anthocyanin pigmentation pathway. Ludwig et al.,  Science  247:449 (1990). 
     Recently, in vivo methods for visualizing GUS activity that do not require destruction of plant tissue have been made available. Molecular Probes publication 2908, Imagene Green™, p. 1-4 (1993) and Naleway et al.,  J. Cell Biol . 115:151a (1991). However, these in vivo methods for visualizing GUS activity have not proven useful for recovery of transformed cells because of low sensitivity, high fluorescent backgrounds and limitations associated with the use of luciferase genes as selectable markers. 
     More recently, a gene encoding Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) has been utilized as a marker for gene expression in prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Chalfie et al.,  Science  263:802 (1994). GFP and mutants of GFP may be used as screenable markers. 
     Promoters—Genes included in expression vectors must be driven by nucleotide sequence comprising a regulatory element, for example, a promoter. Several types of promoters are now well known in the transformation arts, as are other regulatory elements that can be used alone or in combination with promoters. 
     As used herein, “promoter” includes reference to a region of DNA upstream from the start of transcription and involved in recognition and binding of RNA polymerase and other proteins to initiate transcription. A “plant promoter” is a promoter capable of initiating transcription in plant cells. Examples of promoters under developmental control include promoters that preferentially initiate transcription in certain tissues, such as leaves, roots, seeds, fibers, xylem vessels, tracheids, or sclerenchyma. Such promoters are referred to as “tissue-preferred”. Promoters which initiate transcription only in certain tissue are referred to as “tissue-specific”. A “cell type” specific promoter primarily drives expression in certain cell types in one or more organs, for example, vascular cells in roots or leaves. An “inducible” promoter is a promoter which is under environmental control. Examples of environmental conditions that may effect transcription by inducible promoters include anaerobic conditions or the presence of light. Tissue-specific, tissue-preferred, cell type specific, and inducible promoters constitute the class of “non-constitutive” promoters. A “constitutive” promoter is a promoter which is active under most environmental conditions. 
     A. Inducible Promoters 
     An inducible promoter is operably linked to a gene for expression in rice. Optionally, the inducible promoter is operably linked to a nucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence which is operably linked to a gene for expression in rice. With an inducible promoter the rate of transcription increases in response to an inducing agent. 
     Any inducible promoter can be used in the instant invention. See Ward et al.,  Plant Mol. Biol . 22:361-366 (1993). Exemplary inducible promoters include, but are not limited to, that from the ACEI system which responds to copper (Meft et al.,  PNAS  90:4567-4571 (1993)); In2 gene from maize which responds to benzenesulfonamide herbicide safeners (Hershey et al.,  Mol. Gen Genetics  227:229-237 (1991) and Gatz et al.,  Mol. Gen. Genetics  243:32-38 (1994)) or Tet repressor from Tn10 (Gatz et al.,  Mol. Gen. Genetics  227:229-237 (1991). A particularly preferred inducible promoter is a promoter that responds to an inducing agent to which plants do not normally respond. An exemplary inducible promoter is the inducible promoter from a steroid hormone gene, the transcriptional activity of which is induced by a glucocorticosteroid hormone. Schena et al.,  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A . 88:0421 (1991). 
     B. Constitutive Promoters 
     A constitutive promoter is operably linked to a gene for expression in rice or the constitutive promoter is operably linked to a nucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence which is operably linked to a gene for expression in rice. 
     Many different constitutive promoters can be utilized in the instant invention. Exemplary constitutive promoters include, but are not limited to, the promoters from plant viruses such as the 35S promoter from CaMV (Odell et al.,  Nature  313:810-812 (1985) and the promoters from such genes as rice actin (McElroy et al.,  Plant Cell  2:163-171 (1990)); ubiquitin (Christensen et al.,  Plant Mol. Biol . 12:619-632 (1989) and Christensen et al.,  Plant Mol. Biol . 18:675-689 (1992)); pEMU (Last et al.,  Theor. Appl. Genet . 81:581-588 (1991)); MAS (Velten et al.,  EMBO J . 3:2723-2730 (1984)) and maize H3 histone (Lepetit et al.,  Mol. Gen. Genetics  231:276-285 (1992) and Atanassova et al.,  Plant Journal  2 (3): 291-300 (1992)). 
     The ALS promoter, Xba1/NcoI fragment 5′ to the  Brassica napus  ALS3 structural gene (or a nucleotide sequence similarity to said Xba1/NcoI fragment), represents a particularly useful constitutive promoter. See PCT application WO96/30530. 
     C. Tissue-specific or Tissue-preferred Promoters 
     A tissue-specific promoter is operably linked to a gene for expression in rice. Optionally, the tissue-specific promoter is operably linked to a nucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence which is operably linked to a gene for expression in rice. Plants transformed with a gene of interest operably linked to a tissue-specific promoter produce the protein product of the transgene exclusively, or preferentially, in a specific tissue. 
     Any tissue-specific or tissue-preferred promoter can be utilized in the instant invention. Exemplary tissue-specific or tissue-preferred promoters include, but are not limited to, a root-preferred promoter, such as that from the phaseolin gene (Murai et al.,  Science  23:476-482 (1983) and Sengupta-Gopalan et al.,  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A . 82:3320-3324 (1985)); a leaf-specific and light-induced promoter such as that from cab or rubisco (Simpson et al.,  EMBO J . 4(11):2723-2729 (1985) and Timko et al.,  Nature  318:579-582 (1985)); an anther-specific promoter such as that from LAT52 (Twell et al.,  Mol. Gen. Genetics  217:240-245 (1989)); a pollen-specific promoter such as that from Zm13 (Guerrero et al.,  Mol. Gen. Genetics  244:161-168 (1993)) or a microspore-preferred promoter such as that from apg (Twell et al.,  Sex. Plant Reprod . 6:217-224 (1993). 
     Signal Sequences for Targeting Proteins to Subcellular Compartments 
     Transport of protein produced by transgenes to a subcellular compartment such as the chloroplast, vacuole, peroxisome, glyoxysome, cell wall or mitochondroin or for secretion into the apoplast, is accomplished by means of operably linking the nucleotide sequence encoding a signal sequence to the 5′ and/or 3′ region of a gene encoding the protein of interest. Targeting sequences at the 5′ and/or 3′ end of the structural gene may determine, during protein synthesis and processing, where the encoded protein is ultimately compartmentalized. 
     The presence of a signal sequence directs a polypeptide to either an intracellular organelle or subcellular compartment or for secretion to the apoplast. Many signal sequences are known in the art. See, for example Becker et al.,  Plant Mol. Biol . 20:49 (1992), Close, P. S., Master&#39;s Thesis, Iowa State University (1993), Knox, C., et al., “Structure and Organization of Two Divergent Alpha-Amylase Genes from Barley”,  Plant Mol. Biol . 9:3-17 (1987), Lerner et al.,  Plant Physiol . 91:124-129 (1989), Fontes et al.,  Plant Cell  3:483-496 (1991), Matsuoka et al.,  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci . 88:834 (1991), Gould et al.,  J. Cell. Biol . 108:1657 (1989), Creissen et al.,  Plant J . 2:129 (1991), Kalderon, et al., A short amino acid sequence able to specify nuclear location,  Cell  39:499-509 (1984), Steifel, et al., Expression of a maize cell wall hydroxyproline-rich glycoprotein gene in early leaf and root vascular differentiation,  Plant Cell  2:785-793 (1990). 
     Foreign Protein Genes and Agronomic Genes 
     With transgenic plants according to the present invention, a foreign protein can be produced in commercial quantities. Thus, techniques for the selection and propagation of transformed plants, which are well understood in the art, yield a plurality of transgenic plants which are harvested in a conventional manner, and a foreign protein then can be extracted from a tissue of interest or from total biomass. Protein extraction from plant biomass can be accomplished by known methods which are discussed, for example, by Heney and Orr,  Anal. Biochem . 114:92-6 (1981). 
     According to a preferred embodiment, the transgenic plant provided for commercial production of foreign protein is rice. In another preferred embodiment, the biomass of interest is seed. For the relatively small number of transgenic plants that show higher levels of expression, a genetic map can be generated, primarily via conventional RFLP, PCR and SSR analysis, which identifies the approximate chromosomal location of the integrated DNA molecule. For exemplary methodologies in this regard, see Glick and Thompson, Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology CRC Press, Boca Raton 269:284 (1993). Map information concerning chromosomal location is useful for proprietary protection of a subject transgenic plant. If unauthorized propagation is undertaken and crosses made with other germplasm, the map of the integration region can be compared to similar maps for suspect plants, to determine if the latter have a common parentage with the subject plant. Map comparisons would involve hybridizations, RFLP, PCR, SSR and sequencing, all of which are conventional techniques. 
     Likewise, by means of the present invention, agronomic genes can be expressed in transformed plants. More particularly, plants can be genetically engineered to express various phenotypes of agronomic interest. Exemplary genes implicated in this regard include, but are not limited to, those categorized below: 
     1. Genes that Confer Resistance to Pests or Disease and that Encode: 
     A. Plant disease resistance genes. Plant defenses are often activated by specific interaction between the product of a disease resistance gene (R) in the plant and the product of a corresponding avirulence (Avr) gene in the pathogen. A plant inbred line can be transformed with cloned resistance gene to engineer plants that are resistant to specific pathogen strains. See, for example Jones et al.,  Science  266:789 (1994) (cloning of the tomato Cf-9 gene for resistance to  Cladosporium fulvum ); Martin et al.,  Science  262:1432 (1993) (tomato Pto gene for resistance to  Pseudomonas syringae  pv. Tomato encodes a protein kinase); Mindrinos et al.,  Cell  78:1089 (1994) ( Arabidopsis  RSP2 gene for resistance to  Pseudomonas syringae ). 
     B. A  Bacillus thuringiensis  protein, a derivative thereof or a synthetic polypeptide modeled thereon. See, for example, Geiser et al.,  Gene  48:109 (1986), who disclose the cloning and nucleotide sequence of a Bt-endotoxin gene. Moreover, DNA molecules encoding -endotoxin genes can be purchased from American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va., for example, under ATCC Accession Nos. 40098, 67136, 31995 and 31998. 
     C. A lectin. See, for example, the disclose by Van Damme et al.,  Plant Molec. Biol . 24:25 (1994), who disclose the nucleotide sequences of several  Clivia miniata  mannose-binding lectin genes. 
     D. A vitamin-binding protein such as avidin. See PCT application US93/06487, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. The application teaches the use of avidin and avidin homologues as larvicides against insect pests. 
     E. An enzyme inhibitor, for example, a protease or proteinase inhibitor or an amylase inhibitor. See, for example, Abe et al.,  J. Biol. Chem . 262:16793 (1987) (nucleotide sequence of rice cysteine proteinase inhibitor), Huub et al.,  Plant Molec. Biol . 21:985 (1993) (nucleotide sequence of cDNA encoding tobacco proteinase inhibitor 1), Sumitani et al.,  Biosci. Biotech. Biochem . 57:1243 (1993) (nucleotide sequence of  Streptomyces nitrosporeus -amylase inhibitor). 
     F. An insect-specific hormone or pheromone such as an ecdysteroid and juvenile hormone, a variant thereof, a mimetic based thereon, or an antagonist or agonist thereof. See, for example, the disclosure by Hammock et al.,  Nature  344:458 (1990), of baculovirus expression of cloned juvenile hormone esterase, an inactivator of juvenile hormone. 
     G. An insect-specific peptide or neuropeptide which, upon expression, disrupts the physiology of the affected pest. For example, see the disclosures of Regan,  J. Biol. Chem . 269:9 (1994) (expression cloning yields DNA coding for insect diuretic hormone receptor), and Pratt et al.,  Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm . 163:1243 (1989) (an allostatin is identified in  Diploptera puntata ). See also U.S. Pat. No. 5,266,317 to Tomalski et al., who disclose genes encoding insect-specific, paralytic neurotoxins. 
     H. An insect-specific venom produced in nature by a snake, a wasp, etc. For example, see Pang et al.,  Gene  116:165 (1992), for disclosure of heterologous expression in plants of a gene coding for a scorpion insectotoxic peptide. 
     I. An enzyme responsible for a hyper accumulation of a monterpene, a sesquiterpene, a steroid, hydroxamic acid, a phenylpropanoid derivative or another non-protein molecule with insecticidal activity. 
     J. An enzyme involved in the modification, including the post-translational modification, of a biologically active molecule; for example, a glycolytic enzyme, a proteolytic enzyme, a lipolytic enzyme, a nuclease, a cyclase, a transaminase, an esterase, a hydrolase, a phosphatase, a kinase, a phosphorylase, a polymerase, an elastase, a chitinase and a glucanase, whether natural or synthetic. See PCT application WO 93/02197 in the name of Scott et al., which discloses the nucleotide sequence of a callase gene. DNA molecules which contain chitinase-encoding sequences can be obtained, for example, from the ATCC under Accession Nos. 39637 and 67152. See also Kramer et al., Insect  Biochem. Molec. Biol . 23:691 (1993), who teach the nucleotide sequence of a cDNA encoding tobacco hookworm chitinase, and Kawalleck et al.,  Plant Molec. Biol . 21:673 (1993), who provide the nucleotide sequence of the parsley ubi4-2 polyubiquitin gene. 
     K. A molecule that stimulates signal transduction. For example, see the disclosure by Botella et al.,  Plant Molec. Biol . 24:757 (1994), of nucleotide sequences for mung bean calmodulin cDNA clones, and Griess et al.,  Plant Physiol . 104:1467 (1994), who provide the nucleotide sequence of a maize calmodulin cDNA clone. 
     L. A hydrophobic moment peptide. See PCT application WO95/16776 (disclosure of peptide derivatives of Tachyplesin which inhibit fungal plant pathogens) and PCT application WO95/18855 (teaches synthetic antimicrobial peptides that confer disease resistance), the respective contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference. 
     M. A membrane permease, a channel former or a channel blocker. For example, see the disclosure of Jaynes et al.,  Plant Sci  89:43 (1993), of heterologous expression of a cecropin-, lytic peptide analog to render transgenic tobacco plants resistant to  Pseudomonas solanacearum.    
     N. A viral-invasive protein or a complex toxin derived therefrom. For example, the accumulation of viral coat proteins in transformed plant cells imparts resistance to viral infection and/or disease development effected by the virus from which the coat protein gene is derived, as well as by related viruses. See Beachy et al.,  Ann. rev. Phytopathol . 28:451 (1990). Coat protein-mediated resistance has been conferred upon transformed plants against alfalfa mosaic virus, cucumber mosaic virus, tobacco streak virus, potato virus X, potato virus Y, tobacco etch virus, tobacco rattle virus and tobacco mosaic virus. Id. 
     O. An insect-specific antibody or an immunotoxin derived therefrom. Thus, an antibody targeted to a critical metabolic function in the insect gut would inactivate an affected enzyme, killing the insect. Cf. Taylor et al., Abstract #497, Seventh Int&#39;l Symposium on Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions (Edinburgh, Scotland) (1994) (enzymatic inactivation in transgenic tobacco via production of single-chain antibody fragments). 
     P. A virus-specific antibody. See, for example, Tavladoraki et al.,  Nature  366:469 (1993), who show that transgenic plants expressing recombinant antibody genes are protected from virus attack. 
     Q. A developmental-arrestive protein produced in nature by a pathogen or a parasite. Thus, fungal endo-1,4-D-polygalacturonases facilitate fungal colonization and plant nutrient release by solubilizing plant cell wall homo- -1,4-D-galacturonase. See Lamb et al.,  Bio/Technology  10:1436 (1992). The cloning and characterization of a gene which encodes a bean endopolygalacturonase-inhibiting protein is described by Toubart et al.,  Plant J . 2:367 (1992). 
     R. A development-arrestive protein produced in nature by a plant. For example, Logemann et al.,  Bioi/Technology  10:305 (1992), have shown that transgenic plants expressing the barley ribosome-inactivating gene have an increased resistance to fungal disease. 
     2. Genes that Confer Resistance to a Herbicide, for Example: 
     A. A herbicide that inhibits the growing point or meristem, such as an imidazalinone or a sulfonylurea. Exemplary genes in this category code for mutant ALS and AHAS enzyme as described, for example, by Lee et al.,  EMBO J . 7:1241 (1988), and Miki et al.,  Theor. Appl. Genet . 80:449 (1990), respectively. 
     B. Glyphosate (resistance impaired by mutant 5-enolpyruvl-3-phosphikimate synthase (EPSP) and aroA genes, respectively) and other phosphono compounds such as glufosinate (phosphinothricin acetyl transferase, PAT and  Streptomyces hygroscopicus  phosphinothricin-acetyl transferase, bar, genes), and pyridinoxy or phenoxy propionic acids and cycloshexones (ACCase inhibitor-encoding genes). See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,940,835 to Shah, et al., which discloses the nucleotide sequence of a form of EPSP which can confer glyphosate resistance. A DNA molecule encoding a mutant aroA gene can be obtained under ATCC accession number 39256, and the nucleotide sequence of the mutant gene is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,769,061 to Comai. European patent application No. 0 333 033 to Kumada et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 4,975,374 to Goodman et al., disclose nucleotide sequences of glutamine synthetase genes which confer resistance to herbicides such as L-phosphinothricin. The nucleotide sequence of a phosphinothricin-acetyl-transferase gene is provided in European application No. 0 242 246 to Leemans et al., DeGreef et al.,  Bio/Technology  7:61 (1989), describe the production of transgenic plants that express chimeric bar genes coding for phosphinothricin acetyl transferase activity. Exemplary of genes conferring resistance to phenoxy propionic acids and cycloshexones, such as sethoxydim and haloxyfop are the Acc1-S1, Acc1-S2 and Acc1-S3 genes described by Marshall et al.,  Theor. Appl. Genet . 83:435 (1992). 
     C. A herbicide that inhibits photosynthesis, such as a triazine (psbA and gs+ genes) and a benzonitrile (nitrilase gene). Przibilla et al.,  Plant Cell  3:169 (1991), describe the transformation of  Chlamydomonas  with plasmids encoding mutant psbA genes. Nucleotide sequences for nitrilase genes are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,810,648 to Stalker, and DNA molecules containing these genes are available under ATCC Accession Nos. 53435, 67441, and 67442. Cloning and expression of DNA coding for a glutathione S-transferase is described by Hayes et al.,  Biochem. J . 285:173 (1992). 
     3. Genes that Confer or Contribute to a Value-added Trait, Such as: 
     A. Modified fatty acid metabolism, for example, by transforming a plant with an antisense gene of stearyl-ACP desaturase to increase stearic acid content of the plant. See Knultzon et al.,  Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A . 89:2624 (1992). 
     B. Decreased Phytate Content
         1) Introduction of a phytase-encoding gene would enhance breakdown of phytate, adding more free phosphate to the transformed plant. For example, see Van Hartingsveldt et al.,  Gene  127:87 (1993), for a disclosure of the nucleotide sequence of an  Aspergillus niger  phytase gene.   2) A gene could be introduced that reduced phytate content. In maize, this, for example, could be accomplished, by cloning and then reintroducing DNA associated with the single allele which is responsible for maize mutants characterized by low levels of phytic acid. See Raboy et al.,  Maydica  35:383 (1990).       

     C. Modified carbohydrate composition effected, for example, by transforming plants with a gene coding for an enzyme that alters the branching pattern of starch. See Shiroza et al.,  J. Bacteol . 170:810 (1988) (nucleotide sequence of  Streptococcus mutants  fructosyltransferase gene), Steinmetz et al.,  Mol. Gen. Genet.  20:220 (1985) (nucleotide sequence of  Bacillus subtilis  levansucrase gene), Pen et al.,  Bio/Technology  10:292 (1992) (production of transgenic plants that express  Bacillus lichenifonnis -amylase), Elliot et al.,  Plant Molec. Biol . 21:515 (1993) (nucleotide sequences of tomato invertase genes), Søgaard et al.,  J. Biol. Chem . 268:22480 (1993) (site-directed mutagenesis of barley-amylase gene), and Fisher et al.,  Plant Physiol . 102:1045 (1993) (maize endosperm starch branching enzyme 11). 
     Methods for Corn Transformation 
     Numerous methods for plant transformation have been developed, including biological and physical, plant transformation protocols. See, for example, Miki et al., “Procedures for Introducing Foreign DNA into Plants” in  Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology , Glick B. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages 67-88. In addition, expression vectors and in vitro culture methods for plant cell or tissue transformation and regeneration of plants are available. See, for example, Gruber et al., “Vectors for Plant Transformation” in  Methods in Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology , Glick B. R. and Thompson, J. E. Eds. (CRC Press, Inc., Boca Raton, 1993) pages 89-119. 
     A.  Agrobacterium -Mediated Transformation 
     One method for introducing an expression vector into plants is based on the natural transformation system of  Agrobacterium . See, for example, Horsch et al.,  Science  227:1229 (1985).  A. tumefaciens  and  A. rhizogenes  are plant pathogenic soil bacteria which genetically transform plant cells. The Ti and Ri plasmids of  A. tumefaciens  and  A. rhizogenes , respectively, carry genes responsible for genetic transformation of the plant. See, for example, Kado, C. I.,  Crit. Rev. Plant Sci . 10:1 (1991). Descriptions of  Agrobacterium  vector systems and methods for  Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer are provided by Gruber et al., supra, Miki et al., supra, and Moloney et al.,  Plant Cell Reports  8:238 (1989). See also, U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616 issued Jan. 7, 1997. 
     B. Direct Gene Transfer 
     Despite the fact the host range for  Agrobacterium -mediated transformation is broad, some major cereal crop species and gymnosperms have generally been recalcitrant to this mode of gene transfer, even though some success has recently been achieved in rice and corn. Hiei et al.,  The Plant Journal  6:271-282 (1994) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,591,616 issued Jan. 7, 1997. Several methods of plant transformation, collectively referred to as direct gene transfer, have been developed as an alternative to  Agrobacterium -mediated transformation. 
     A generally applicable method of plant transformation is microprojectile-mediated transformation wherein DNA is carried on the surface of microprojectiles measuring 1 to 4 μm. The expression vector is introduced into plant tissues with a biolistic device that accelerates the microprojectiles to speeds of 300 to 600 m/s which is sufficient to penetrate plant cell walls and membranes. Sanford et al.,  Part. Sci. Technol . 5:27 (1987), Sanford, J. C.,  Trends Biotech . 6:299 (1988), Klein et al.,  Bio/Technology  6:559-563 (1988), Sanford, J. C.,  Physiol Plant  7:206 (1990), Klein et al.,  Biotechnology  10:268 (1992). In corn, several target tissues can be bombarded with DNA-coated microprojectiles in order to produce transgenic plants, including, for example, callus (Type I or Type II), immature embryos, and meristematic tissue. 
     Another method for physical delivery of DNA to plants is sonication of target cells. Zhang et al.,  Bio/Technology  9:996 (1991). Alternatively, liposome or spheroplast fusion have been used to introduce expression vectors into plants. Deshayes et al.,  EMBO J ., 4:2731 (1985), Christou et al.,  Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A . 84:3962 (1987). Direct uptake of DNA into protoplasts using CaCl 2  precipitation, polyvinyl alcohol or poly-L-omithine have also been reported. Hain et al.,  Mol. Gen. Genet . 199:161 (1985) and Draper et al.,  Plant Cell Physiol . 23:451 (1982). Electroporation of protoplasts and whole cells and tissues have also been described. Donn et al., In Abstracts of VIIth International Congress on Plant Cell and Tissue Culture IAPTC, A2-38, p 53 (1990); D&#39;Halluin et al.,  Plant Cell  4:1495-1505 (1992) and Spencer et al.,  Plant Mol. Biol . 24:51-61 (1994). 
     Following transformation of rice target tissues, expression of the above-described selectable marker genes allows for preferential selection of transformed cells, tissues and/or plants, using regeneration and selection methods now well known in the art. 
     The foregoing methods for transformation would typically be used for producing a transgenic inbred line. The transgenic inbred line could then be crossed, with another (non-transformed or transformed) inbred line, in order to produce a new transgenic inbred line. Alternatively, a genetic trait which has been engineered into a particular rice line using the foregoing transformation techniques could be moved into another line using traditional backcrossing techniques that are well known in the plant breeding arts. For example, a backcrossing approach could be used to move an engineered trait from a public, non-elite inbred line into an elite inbred line, or from an inbred line containing a foreign gene in its genome into an inbred line or lines which do not contain that gene. As used herein, “crossing” can refer to a simple X by Y cross, or the process of backcrossing, depending on the context. 
     When the term inbred rice plant is used in the context of the present invention, this also includes any single gene conversions of that inbred. The term single gene converted plant as used herein refers to those rice plants which are developed by a plant breeding technique called backcrossing wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of an inbred are recovered in addition to the single gene transferred into the inbred via the backcrossing technique. Backcrossing methods can be used with the present invention to improve or introduce a characteristic into the inbred. The term backcrossing as used herein refers to the repeated crossing of a hybrid progeny back to one of the parental rice plants for that inbred. The parental rice plant which contributes the gene for the desired characteristic is termed the nonrecurrent or donor parent. This terminology refers to the fact that the nonrecurrent parent is used one time in the backcross protocol and therefore does not recur. The parental rice plant to which the gene or genes from the nonrecurrent parent are transferred is known as the recurrent parent as it is used for several rounds in the backcrossing protocol (Poehlman &amp; Sleper, 1994; Fehr, 1987). In a typical backcross protocol, the original inbred of interest (recurrent parent) is crossed to a second inbred (nonrecurrent parent) that carries the single gene of interest to be transferred. The resulting progeny from this cross are then crossed again to the recurrent parent and the process is repeated until a rice plant is obtained wherein essentially all of the desired morphological and physiological characteristics of the recurrent parent are recovered in the converted plant, in addition to the single transferred gene from the nonrecurrent parent. 
     The selection of a suitable recurrent parent is an important step for a successful backcrossing procedure. The goal of a backcross protocol is to alter or substitute a single trait or characteristic in the original inbred. To accomplish this, a single gene of the recurrent inbred is modified or substituted with the desired gene from the nonrecurrent parent, while retaining essentially all of the rest of the desired genetic, and therefore the desired physiological and morphological, constitution of the original inbred. The choice of the particular nonrecurrent parent will depend on the purpose of the backcross, one of the major purposes is to add some commercially desirable, agronomically important trait to the plant. The exact backcrossing protocol will depend on the characteristic or trait being altered to determine an appropriate testing protocol. Although backcrossing methods are simplified when the characteristic being transferred is a dominant allele, a recessive allele may also be transferred. In this instance it may be necessary to introduce a test of the progeny to determine if the desired characteristic has been successfully transferred. 
     Many single gene traits have been identified that are not regularly selected for in the development of a new inbred but that can be improved by backcrossing techniques. Single gene traits may or may not be transgenic, examples of these traits include but are not limited to, male sterility, waxy starch, herbicide resistance, resistance for bacterial, fungal, or viral disease, insect resistance, male fertility, enhanced nutritional quality, industrial usage, yield stability and yield enhancement. These genes are generally inherited through the nucleus. Some known exceptions to this are the genes for male sterility, some of which are inherited cytoplasmically, but still act as single gene traits. Several of these single gene traits are described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,777,196; 5,948,957 and 5,969,212, the disclosures of which are specifically hereby incorporated by reference. 
     Deposit Information 
     A deposit of the California Cooperative Rice Research Foundation proprietary rice cultivar M-206 disclosed above and recited in the appended claims has been made with the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC), 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va. 20110. The date of deposit was Jun. 18, 2003. The deposit of 2,500 seeds were taken from the same deposit maintained by the California Cooperative Rice Research Foundation since prior to the filing date of this application. All restrictions upon the deposit have been removed, and the deposit is intended to meet all of the requirements of 37 C.F.R. §1.801-1.809. The ATCC accession number is PTA-5274. The deposit will be maintained in the depository for a period of 30 years, or 5 years after the last request, or for the effective life of the patent, whichever is longer, and will be replaced as necessary during that period. 
     Although the foregoing invention has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes of clarity and understanding, it will be obvious that certain changes and modifications may be practiced within the scope of the invention, as limited only by the scope of the appended claims.