Supreme Court Audio Transcript

Transcript:
give them to the Nodal Counsel and make them a part of the compilation. I'm sorry to keep all of you waiting. Actually, both Justice Khanna and I were in a meeting with the members of the Bar. Senior advocates designation. So, this is something very important to the Bar. Just the preliminary groundwork which has to be done. This point one must ask for a trade-off, as I mentioned earlier. But I'm very fearful of that. Because, when we were arguing 370, they gave me water and I said "whiskey", and I got calls from Singapore and all over India, was there whiskey in the glass or not. Now, I want to take Your Lordships to the Statement of Objects and Reasons. I'm still on the purpose point, which is in Volume 4(a). So, submission we'll look at. Please have a seat. Please have a seat Dr. Dhavan. Look at the, look at the antecedent history of the institution, one, the purpose of this statute and place the provisions of the statute in the backdrop of the antecedent history and its purpose, and the mere fact that the statutory provision somehow restricts what a minority institution could otherwise do in the absence of the statute, would not be a ground to deny its status as an Article 30 institution. And that's the point about recognition also. And recognition and affiliation, you have to apply according to you for recognition. Otherwise, your degrees will never be recognised. Even for schools, where they depend on aid. That's the submission, really. Even there, My Lord. Colleges too. Colleges. In fact, the whole part of Inamdar relates to aided and unaided. But provided, aided don't lose their minority character. May I sit down? I am very sorry. Yes, Dr. Dhavan. Please have a seat. Volume 4(a), page 88. You were reading