Supreme Court Audio Transcript

Transcript:
consider the decisions and then whatever the outcome is, let the outcome be. But a shortcut of this nature will lead us nowhere. <<LUNCH BREAK>> So My Lords as I was on the list of dates, let me finish that first. So I was on item 47. Now 48 - as the delinquent MLAs of SSLP voted against the party whip on 2nd July, issued regarding the election office of the Speaker, election of the Office of the Speaker. Fresh disqualification proceedings were initiated against the delinquent MLAs as per the provisions of 2(1)(b) of the 10th Schedule. Because whether they voted against the party Whip so all 39 were involved in there. So 16 earlier, then on the 27th My Lords the balance 22, for which My Lords notice has not yet been issued, and all 39 now. This is 2(1)(b). That is 2(1)(a) and even for this notice has not been issued. transcription@teres.ai So this 3rd July, issued against how many you said? 39, 39 for two under 2(1)(b) for violating the Whip. I'm