Solar Cell QA Datasets
Collection
First-turn, second-turn, and zero-index QA pairs for solar cells
•
3 items
•
Updated
answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"0.932 V"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.05.032 | There is an increase in the open-circuit voltage (VOC) from 0.932 V to 0.979 V due to the increased work function of the PEDOT:PSS thin films obtained by increasing the spin rate from 3000 rpm to 5000 rpm. | What is the value of VOC? | 4683 |
{
"text": [
"75%"
],
"answer_start": [
56
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.08.041 | The best η of 5.0% (Jsc= 8.6 mA cm−2, Voc= 778 mV, FF = 75%) was obtained with partially dyed-TiO2 (dye-loading of 9.0 × 10−11mol cm−2) photoanodes, which were pressurized to a thickness of 6.1 μm. | What is the value of FF? | 34823 |
{
"text": [
"58"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA03731J | These bi-functional devices achieved a maximal solar energy conversion efficiency of 6.58% and a specific length capacitance of 85.03 mF cm−1, respectively. | What is ? | 23169 |
{
"text": [
"0.36 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
28
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.09.138 | Prepared solar cells with a 0.36 cm2 active area were characterized by J-V measurements and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). | What is the value of active area? | 49584 |
{
"text": [
"14.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.11.047 | Interestingly, an even higher PCE of 14.04% was obtained in the device using 1:1 C60: C70 with a Voc of 0.946V, a Jsc of 21.01mAcm−2, and an FF of 70.64%, which is slightly higher than that of PC61BM device prepared by the same procedure. | What is the value of PCE? | 2940 |
{
"text": [
"c-TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
371
]
} | 10.1016/j.joule.2018.06.012 | Both devices were subjected to maximum power-point tracking for a period of time and no noticeable changes were observed (To further probe whether the absorption of oxidized Spiro in the visible region at 520nm affects the perovskite absorption and this in turn influences the short-circuit current, we measured UV-vis absorption of perovskite samples with structure FTO/c-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/HTL using integrating sphere in transmission mode. | What is FTO? | 10282 |
{
"text": [
"0.48V"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.01.004 | YC-2-based DSSCs exhibited a Jsc of 4.84mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.48V, and an FF of 63.4%, achieving η of 1.46%. | What is the value of Voc? | 30757 |
{
"text": [
"CoS"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA14051J | Thus, the DSSC based on the optimized rGO–CoS composite CEs showed marked enhancement in PCE compared with the previously reported works involved with other fabrication approaches. | What is CEs? | 64652 |
{
"text": [
"650"
],
"answer_start": [
205
]
} | 10.1039/B703750C | 9 shows the decay for the spiro-OMeTAD cation upon excitation of the MSqb/TiO2/spiro-OMeTAD film.As can be seen, a long-lived positive signal is observed when we probe at λ = 570 nm upon excitation at λ = 650 nm. | What is TiO2? | 68755 |
{
"text": [
"11.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA00486H | This result is comparable to that obtained from spiro-OMeTAD based solar cells (11.4%) for the same amount of doping.IPCE spectra of these devices with new HTMs revealed that the increased optical absorption between 500 nm and 750 nm within the KTM3 layers due to doping did not affect the photoconversion efficiency. | What is the value of PCE? | 14348 |
{
"text": [
"6.9mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
180
]
} | 10.1016/j.jmst.2013.02.004 | The η of the CA-ZnO DSSCs reached 3.17% with Jsc of 11.7mA/cm2, Voc of 661mV, and FF of 0.384, which was much higher than the rate of 1.51% calculated for MA-ZnO DSSCs with Jsc of 6.9mA/cm2 and that of 0.61% for NA-ZnO DSSCs with Jsc of 4.2mA/cm2. | What is the value of Jsc? | 25172 |
{
"text": [
"73.80%"
],
"answer_start": [
269
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA13799C | The optimized concentration of 0.6 wt% graphene in N-TNTs NC based DSSCs exhibited η of 6.33% with Jsc of 12.86 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.715 V, and FF of 65.13% as compared to that of pure N-TNTs based DSSC has η of 4.29% with a Jsc of 8.34 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.696 V, and FF of 73.80%. | What is the value of FF? | 63442 |
{
"text": [
"737.43mV"
],
"answer_start": [
177
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.02.040 | For the DSSC fabricated with graphene/Si-MCP-300°C counter electrode, the open circuit voltage (Voc), current density (Jsc), fill factor (FF), and conversion efficiency (η) are 737.43mV, 15.18mA-cm−2, 0.64, and 7.16%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 58110 |
{
"text": [
"8.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1039/C6EE00424E | The result is that we are able to attain DSCs that display power conversion efficiencies (PCE) of 8.55%, when TCO glass is used as the counter-electrode, and a short circuit photocurrent (JSC) of 16.11 mA cm−2 under 1 Sun illumination, which is, to the best of our knowledge, the highest achieved on plastic substrates to date. | What is the value of PCE? | 61422 |
{
"text": [
"0.158 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1039/C0EE00218F | The devices were masked to attain an illuminated active area of 0.158 cm2.The PIA spectra of the various cells were recorded over a wavelength range of approximately 500–1500 nm following a (on/off) photo-modulation using a 9 Hz square wave emanating from a blue LED (470 nm). | What is the value of active area? | 70394 |
{
"text": [
"4.14%"
],
"answer_start": [
107
]
} | 10.1039/C3CC00060E | L102 had a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.20%, which is better than for L101, which shows a PCE of 4.14%. | What is the value of PCE? | 61763 |
{
"text": [
"22.841mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
127
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.07.047 | The co-sensitizer devices had the best performance at a PbS concentration of 2% with a VOC, JSC, FF, and efficiency of 0.557V, 22.841mAcm−2, 0.55, and 6.99%, respectively. | What is the value of JSC? | 4162 |
{
"text": [
"1.08V"
],
"answer_start": [
99
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.08.039 | As a result, for PSCs based on the C60-SAM modified TiO2, a high efficiency of 17.8% with a Voc of 1.08V, a short circuit current density (Jsc) of 22.91mA/cm2, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.72 was achieved, and it is much higher than those of devices based on bare TiO2 and PC61BM modified TiO2. | What is the value of Voc? | 11251 |
{
"text": [
"13.51mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
29
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.04.124 | A maximum η of 4.10%, Jsc of 13.51mA/cm2 and Voc of 0.605V were achieved for DSSC based on 0.15at.% Bi2Te3 NSs mixed, and the η and Jsc increased by 46.95% and 44.7% compared with pure ones. | What is the value of Jsc? | 31585 |
{
"text": [
"20.2Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
39
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.04.002 | However, the Rs value for Sb2S3@CNP-T (20.2Ω) is obviously higher than Sb2S3@CNP-S, which can be ascribed to the increased intrinsic resistance of FTO glass after thermal evaporation. | What is the value of Rs? | 27404 |
{
"text": [
"17.43%"
],
"answer_start": [
116
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA00303C | The PSC cell based on the G-TiO2 ETL (from low temperature (<150 °C) processed G-TiO2 NPs) achieves the best PCE of 17.43% for small area cells and 14.19% for the submodule (designated area: 25.2 cm2). | What is the value of PCE? | 22769 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
113
]
} | 10.1007/s11434-016-1050-x | shows the J–V curves of the corresponding perovskite solar cells under a solar simulator with a power density of 100 mW/cm2. | What is the value of solar? | 6692 |
{
"text": [
"6.23%"
],
"answer_start": [
204
]
} | 10.1039/C2JM30594A | The porous PANI–CSA nanostructures with increased BET surface area exhibited an equivalent incident photon-to-electron conversion efficiency (IPCE) of 68.86% and a power-conversion efficiency (PCE, η) of 6.23% compared to DSSCs containing Pt-coated ITO CE (IPCE of 68.70% and η = 6.17%). | What is the value of η? | 69508 |
{
"text": [
"7.80mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.01.002 | A fresh reference devices without bias treatment show performance with Voc of 0.66V, Jsc of 7.80mAcm−2, FF of 48.09%, and PCE of 2.47%, which is similar to the device performance shown in . | What is the value of Jsc? | 53856 |
{
"text": [
"10.26 ± 0.07%"
],
"answer_start": [
275
]
} | 10.1039/C3EE44168G | Although the organic sensitizer AN-4 alone gave a modest PCE of 4.4%, co-sensitization of LD31 with AN-4 in a molar ratio of 2/1 further enhanced the DSSC performance to achieve JSC/mA cm−2 = 20.27 ± 0.33, VOC/mV = 704 ± 4, FF = 0.718 ± 0.004, and the overall efficiency η = 10.26 ± 0.07%. | What is the value of η? | 76185 |
{
"text": [
"7.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
188
]
} | 10.1039/C3EE44174A | To our knowledge, this is the first successful demonstration of a conjugated polymer-based solar cell with a PCE exceeding the maximum value obtained from a spiro-MeOTAD-based solar cell (7.6%). | What is the value of PCE? | 15443 |
{
"text": [
"0.89 V"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA03370E | The highest photovoltaic parameters in perovskite cells with 80 nm-thick c-TiO2 films were as follows: JSC of 21.0 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.89 V, FF of 62%, and efficiency of 11.5%. | What is the value of VOC? | 14932 |
{
"text": [
"23.2mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.128 | In contrast, the performance of PSCs based on TT-TiO2 ETL are significantly improved, achieving the best PCE of 17.4% with enhanced Jsc of 23.2mAcm−2, Voc of 1.1V and FF of 68%, indicating that Ti precursors have important impact on the ETL and the performance of the resulted PSCs.a and b show the top-view FESEM images of TDB-TiO2 and TT-TiO2 films spin-coated on FTO substrate, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 8744 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.050 | Current-voltage characteristics were measured using a solar simulator (Newport, Class 3A, 94023A) under simulated AM 1.5G sunlight (100mWcm−2) with a Keithley 2420 source meter. | What is the value of solar? | 6235 |
{
"text": [
"1.29%"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
} | 10.1016/j.jmst.2020.01.024 | Efficiency (η) of the DSSCs is 2.52 for Pt, 1.61% for M-MoS2 and 1.29% for S-MoS2, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 31846 |
{
"text": [
"10"
],
"answer_start": [
95
]
} | 10.1007/s11434-016-1120-0 | It was particularly notable that, when the thickness of the TiO2 photoanode was decreased from 10 to 2 μm, the short circuit current density and efficiency of a DSSC using CZTS–graphene as the CE changed from a lower value to a higher value, relative to those of a DSSC using a Pt CE. | What is TiO2? | 26224 |
{
"text": [
"1000 s"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA04246B | KCl, and the resulting layer is homogeneous.Three electrodeposition times (tED) were used, 1000 s, 2000 s and 3600 s, respectively. | What is the value of time? | 15952 |
{
"text": [
"9.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | Owing to the improved electrocatalytic activity, reduced charge-transfer resistance, and increased diffusion, the PCE was further increased to 9.04%. | What is the value of PCE? | 66732 |
{
"text": [
"5.07%"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.116 | The photoelectric conversion efficiency (η) of 5.07% for 10 wt% STS@SiO2 doped TiO2–based DSSC was higher than that of 3.72% for pure TiO2–based DSSC and 4.29% for 10 wt% STS doped TiO2–based DSSC. | What is the value of η? | 53228 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
61
]
} | 10.1039/C4NJ01459F | The adsorption concentration of the N719 dye adsorbed on the TiO2 film was analysed by using UV/vis spectrometry (UV-160A, Shimadzu Co.). | What is ? | 75567 |
{
"text": [
"6.10%"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.09.279 | The optimized device reached an η of 8.34%, which is 37% higher than that of the pure TiO2 based device (6.10%). | What is the value of η? | 49673 |
{
"text": [
"0.74%"
],
"answer_start": [
187
]
} | 10.1016/j.cap.2011.03.038 | From UV–Vis spectra, transmittance of bare FTO andGOFI−V coated on FTO substrate are 68.1, 61.6, 56.4, 43.5, 29.9,and 6.6%, respectively ((c)) as the χ axis, the values of η are plotted: 0.74% for DSSCFTO, 2.30% for DSSCI, 2.16% for DSSCII, 1.81% for DSSCIII, 1.63% for DSSCIV, and 1.56% for DSSCV. | What is the value of η? | 46120 |
{
"text": [
"10.20%"
],
"answer_start": [
220
]
} | 10.1039/C8EE00580J | 3a and Table 1, the J–V responses show a significant increase in photovoltaic parameters (Jsc: from 22.97 mA cm−2 to 23.43 mA cm−2; Voc: from 1.01 V to 1.07 V; FF: from 44.0% to 74.8%) and the overall PCE increases from 10.20% to 18.75% by PDL treatment. | What is the value of PCE? | 22999 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
166
]
} | 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.07.037 | Standard J–V measurements were carried out using a solar simulator (Yamashita Denso YSS-200A) equipped with a 1600 W xenon lamp and an AM 1.5 G filter; the power was 100 mW/cm2. | What is the value of solar? | 34754 |
{
"text": [
"7.31%"
],
"answer_start": [
251
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.023 | The PV37 composite electrode delivers short circuit current density (Jsc), open circuit voltage (Voc), and fill factor (FF) of 16.22 mA/cm2, 0.76 V, and 0.63, respectively, generating its power-conversion efficiency (η) of 7.77%, which is superior to 7.31% for the bared PtNP electrode with Jsc, Voc, and FF of 15.63 mA/cm2, 0.82 V, and 0.57, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 37765 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
295
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC02603J | The above results perfectly show that the stability of devices and tolerance to UV-light can be enhanced by interface modification and filtering ultraviolet light.We demonstrated that silane coupling agents (e.g., KH570) could be effectively introduced into the interface between the c-TiO2 and CH3NH3PbI3 films, as a modifier, in planar perovskite solar cells. | What is perovskite? | 16406 |
{
"text": [
"8.70%"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
} | 10.1039/C6TC01715K | While the Mo2C-Ms CE yields a high catalytic activity and the PCE of the device reaches 8.70% with Voc = 853 mV, Jsc = 15.23 mA cm−2, and FF = 0.67. | What is the value of PCE? | 60298 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcrysgro.2016.11.004 | The photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) characteristics of DSSCs were measured by a Keithley 2400 source meter under the standard illumination (100 mW/cm2) coming from a solar simulator (UHE-16 equipped with a 150 W Xenon Arc lamp and an AM 1.5 filter, Science Tech, Canada). | What is the value of illumination? | 47839 |
{
"text": [
"0.76 V"
],
"answer_start": [
77
]
} | 10.1039/C0EE00474J | The conventional back-illuminated NT-DSSC exhibits JSC = 9.56 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.76 V and FF = 0.64, giving total efficiency 4.61% of power conversion at tube length 20 μm. | What is the value of VOC? | 76527 |
{
"text": [
"0.48 V"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2017.10.173 | Undoped TiO2 based DSSC exhibits a Voc of 0.48 V, Jsc of 5.0 mAcm−2, FF of 0.362 with an efficiency of 0.87%. | What is the value of Voc? | 36209 |
{
"text": [
"0.528 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
347
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2010.08.003 | Under standard global AM 1.5 (50 mW/cm2) solar condition, the POT sensitized solar cell gave a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 0.363 mA/cm2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.350 V and fill factor (FF) of 0.338, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 0.086%; the POT/TiO2 sensitized solar cell gave a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 0.528 mA/cm2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.376 V and fill factor (FF) of 0.507, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 0.202%; the POT/TiO2/Fe2O3 sensitized solar cell gave a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 0.698 mA/cm2, open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.542 V and fill factor (FF) of 0.659, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 0.499%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 39593 |
{
"text": [
"5.91±0.18%"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.06.015 | It was notable to observe that the power conversion efficiency (η) was increased from 5.91±0.18% to 6.38±0.13% when the Pt-FTO CE is replaced by a Fe3C/C CE. | What is the value of η? | 57418 |
{
"text": [
"6.7%"
],
"answer_start": [
96
]
} | 10.1039/C7CP06703H | A range of PCE's were observed for devices prepared with YZ11, YZ13, YZ16 and YZ17 from 4.2% to 6.7% using the I−/I3− redox couple (Table 2 and Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 71451 |
{
"text": [
"0.98%"
],
"answer_start": [
166
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.08.077 | As a result, a remarkable efficiency of 1.30% is achieved for D205 modified ZnO NAR/NR-P3HT HSC, which is 32.7% higher than that of D205 modified ZnO NR-P3HT HSC (η= 0.98%), and far larger than that of unmodified ZnO NR-P3HT cell (η= 0.22%).Zinc acetate dihydrate ((CH3COO)2Zn), Zinc nitrate hexahydrate (Zn(NO3)2·6H2O), hexamethylenetetramine ((CH2)6N4), monoethanolamine, 2-methoxyethanol, Poly(3-hexylthiophene) (P3HT), 1,2-dichlorobenzene and chenodeoxycholic acid were purchased from Sigma. | What is the value of η? | 51022 |
{
"text": [
"16.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06143E | 2b.It is also noticeable that the overall PCE increased more than one-fold from 8.12% to 16.41%, mainly assigned to the slightly increased Voc and the greatly enhanced Jsc and FF. | What is the value of PCE? | 22293 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
129
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.11.132 | The photocurrent-voltage (J−V) characteristics of the DSSCs were measured by Keithley 2400 source meter under simulated AM 1.5G (100mW/cm2) illumination with a solar light simulator (Pecell-L15, Japan). | What is the value of illumination? | 56529 |
{
"text": [
"0.679 V"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1039/C4CP04120H | For HD-15, Voc increased from 0.557 V to 0.679 V, upon increasing η% from 7.27 to 9.17. | What is the value of Voc? | 71298 |
{
"text": [
"14.87mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.09.001 | The TLEP-1 and TLEP-2 sensitized cells gave a η of 6.44% and 7.33% (Jsc=12.61 and 14.87mAcm−2, Voc=816 and 777mV, FF=0.63 and 0.63, respectively) under standard global AM 1.5G one sun illumination (100mWcm−2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 32093 |
{
"text": [
"14.64%"
],
"answer_start": [
127
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.12.017 | The applicability of the p-(F)-PO-TAZ CIL in flexible IOSCs and PSCs was further demonstrated by the maximum PCEs of 7.68% and 14.64%, respectively, which mainly originates from the increased values of FF, VOC and JSC. | What is the value of PCE? | 7781 |
{
"text": [
"4.30%"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.11.059 | As a result, the power conversion efficiency of DSSCs based on ∼18.5 μm single layered SnO2 @TiO2 is 4.30%, while an increased DSSC η of 5.55% has been witnessed for Cell II. | What is the value of η? | 57769 |
{
"text": [
"468 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1039/B302552G | According to our analysis from the action spectrum, dye2 generated a similar value of 4.0%(with Isc of 11.1 mA cm−2, Voc of 468 mV, and 0.615 for fill factor). | What is the value of Voc? | 76986 |
{
"text": [
"1.02 V"
],
"answer_start": [
84
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.091 | Therefore, Ba-2% device shows the best performance of 17.4% (Jsc = 23 mAcm−2, Voc = 1.02 V and FF = 0.74). | What is the value of Voc? | 1311 |
{
"text": [
"7.69%"
],
"answer_start": [
107
]
} | 10.1039/C6CS00752J | The DSSC with HACNF CE achieved a PCE of 7.21%, which was comparable to that of the device based on Pt CE (7.69%). | What is the value of PCE? | 66729 |
{
"text": [
"3.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
88
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | Devices with this electrodeposited NiO film and CuSCN film exhibited a PCE of 7.26% and 3.8%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 13396 |
{
"text": [
"7.79%"
],
"answer_start": [
252
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06115J | Impressively, the performance is considerably improved by using the 25-IPA/CYHEX device and all photovoltaic parameters (Voc, Jsc, FF and PCE are 1.34 V, 8.08 mA cm−2, 68% and 7.41% for the forward scan, respectively, and 1.35 V, 8.22 mA cm−2, 70% and 7.79% for the reverse scan, respectively) are largely increased in comparison with the former two devices, with much less hysteresis (HI = 5%). | What is the value of PCE? | 12872 |
{
"text": [
"14.59%"
],
"answer_start": [
225
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.01.009 | As shown in d, the PCE of the pristine perovskite device prepared by two-step method is seen to decay from ∼12% to 1% over the first week, whereas that of the hot-casting-based device remains at more than 91% (from 16.01% to 14.59%) after 10 days later. | What is the value of PCE? | 5741 |
{
"text": [
"7.78 %"
],
"answer_start": [
224
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.041 | The one with larger TiO2 aggregates calcined at a fast heating rate possessed excellent light scattering ability, and exhibited a short-circuit current density (Jsc) and energy conversion efficiency (η) of 15.21 mA cm−2 and 7.78 %. | What is the value of η? | 59888 |
{
"text": [
"0.69 V"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2009.11.030 | These results are summarized in (a), Voc and Jsc were observed as 0.68 V and 9.51 mA/cm2 for the SWCNT-counter electrode DSSC, and 0.69 V and 10.55 mA/cm2 for the MWCNT-counter electrode DSSC. | What is the value of Voc? | 26969 |
{
"text": [
"10.07%"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA02755E | 5A(c), with Jsc, Voc, FF and PCE increasing to 18.55 mA cm−2, 0.763 V, 72.24% and 10.07%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 73963 |
{
"text": [
"9.02%"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.01.153 | The DSSC with CoTe2@NCNTs CE manifests overwhelming photovoltaic performance (PCE of 9.02%), which exceeds that of Pt CEs (8.03%). | What is the value of PCE? | 59588 |
{
"text": [
"3 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
32
]
} | 10.1039/B913168J | The best device (active area of 3 cm2) had an open-circuit voltage of 0.43 V, a short-circuit current of 0.19 mA cm−2, a fill factor of 27.4%, and a power conversion efficiency of 0.02% (0.1–0.4% for P3CT:[60]PCBM). | What is the value of active area? | 77211 |
{
"text": [
"5.94mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
376
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2018.05.021 | The detailed photovoltaic parameters, such as short-circuit current density (Jsc, mA/cm2), open-circuit voltage (Voc, V), fill factor (ff, %) and efficiency (η, %) of DSSC devices, are shown in TEMPO-I (device A)- and TEMPO-III (device B)-based cells (without BIMI electrolyte) exhibited efficiencies of approximately 2.17% (Jsc=5.69mA/cm2, Voc=0.622V, FF=61%) and 2.38% (Jsc=5.94mA/cm2, Voc=0.647V, FF=61%), respectively, under 1 sunlight illumination. | What is the value of Jsc? | 25880 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1039/C8EE01500G | To finalize the preparation of devices, a 80 nm-thick Au electrode was further deposited on the FTO/cp-TiO2/mp-TiO2/perovskite/spiro-MeOTAD films.The current (J)–voltage (V) property of the hole-only device (FTO/spiro-MeOTAD/Au) was measured in the dark to obtain the space charge limited current (SCLC). | What is FTO? | 21316 |
{
"text": [
"NF 6 h"
],
"answer_start": [
48
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.02.025 | The sequence of Rct of the four CEs is NF 3 h > NF 6 h > NF 9 h > NF 12 h, indicating that with the size increasing of nanoflowers, the unique 3-dimensional spatial structure possesses better diffusion velocity for the reduction of I3− in the electrolyte.a shows the PCE curves of the DSSCs fabricated with the four CEs. | What is CEs? | 49792 |
{
"text": [
"871 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA02325D | The device with 30% content of carbon black showed a Voc of 871 mV, a Jsc of 14.34 mA cm−2, a FF of 0.52 and a PCE of 6.44%. | What is the value of Voc? | 15330 |
{
"text": [
"983.54 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.11.132 | The average PCE, JSC, VOC and FF of this single organic cation perovskite device are 8.64%, 17.32 mA/cm2, 983.54 mV and 50.78% respectively. | What is the value of VOC? | 4129 |
{
"text": [
"0.526 V"
],
"answer_start": [
165
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00362E | Upon deposition on a transparent TiO2 electrode, TP2A dye showed a wide absorption spectrum in the 500–650 nm region and showed a high open circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.526 V in a DSSC. | What is the value of VOC? | 62642 |
{
"text": [
"56"
],
"answer_start": [
113
]
} | 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.11.054 | The IPCE values for commercial, hollow sphere and pomegranate like hierarchical ZnO structures were 26%, 50% and 56%, respectively.In our study we demonstrate that architecture of the semiconductor material is important for the achievement of high power conversion efficiency. | What is IPCE? | 40253 |
{
"text": [
"2.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
232
]
} | 10.1039/B918282A | Under the same conditions, the P1-sensitized cell gave a Jsc value of 5.95 mA cm−2, a Voc of 544 mV and an ff of 0.66, corresponding to the η value of 2.13% and P3 gave a Jsc of 5.45 mA cm−2, a Voc of 536 mV, an ff of 0.70 and η of 2.04%.Fig. | What is the value of η? | 75479 |
{
"text": [
"7.16%"
],
"answer_start": [
225
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.12.023 | Their energy-conversion efficiency (η) was ranked in the order FTO/Pt>FTO/MoS2 (40min)>FTO/MoS2 (20min)>FTO/MoS2 (60 min).In particular, the D-SSC with the FTO/MoS2 (40min) CE exhibited remarkable cell efficiency (as high as 7.16%), which is 95.7% of the level of a conventional Pt CE. | What is the value of η? | 46095 |
{
"text": [
"titania"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA03909B | A typical DSSC consists of dye-sensitized titania as a photoanode, iodide/triiodide as a redox shuttle, and platinum as a counter electrode. | What is photoanode? | 72452 |
{
"text": [
"50"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1016/j.micromeso.2015.11.054 | The IPCE values for commercial, hollow sphere and pomegranate like hierarchical ZnO structures were 26%, 50% and 56%, respectively.In our study we demonstrate that architecture of the semiconductor material is important for the achievement of high power conversion efficiency. | What is IPCE? | 40248 |
{
"text": [
"5.57%"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.05.037 | The DSSC device based on pCPPR reaches significantly higher PCE of 5.57%, with dominating contribution from higher JSC. | What is the value of PCE? | 27506 |
{
"text": [
"17.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
95
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.02.026 | Consistent with the morphologies, the PCEs obtained using CF, CB, and DCB were 11.0, 16.7, and 17.5%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 8214 |
{
"text": [
"11.31 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2012.08.039 | The high concentration of I3- ions at PPy surface clearly implies the low Voc.On a positive note, the short circuit current density, Jsc (11.31 mA/cm2), of PPy based DSSC is slightly higher than that of Pt based DSSC (11.01 mA/cm2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 50616 |
{
"text": [
"73.40%"
],
"answer_start": [
189
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.051 | When the Y/Ti molar ratios in the hydrothermal grown solutions increased from 3% to 5%, the Jsc, Voc, FF and PCE decreased from 22.50mAcm−2, 1.06V, 76.16% and 18.11% to 22.32mAcm−2, 1.05V, 73.40% and 17.09%. | What is the value of FF? | 1571 |
{
"text": [
"8.47mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
58
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.050 | The Cl-doped cubic CsPbBr3(Cl) exhibits a champion Jsc of 8.47mAcm−2 and a PCE of 6.21%, superior to that of pure orthorhombic CsPbBr3 (6.22mAcm−2 and 3.78%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 6241 |
{
"text": [
"5.21 mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
220
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2015.06.007 | In detail, at 20 nm the PCE increase is mainly ascribed to Voc (from 0.65 V to 0.79 V) and FF (from 55% to 66%) improvements, while at 68 nm the PCE increase is mainly contributed by Jsc improvement (from 3.71 mAcm−2 to 5.21 mAcm−2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 51625 |
{
"text": [
"0.16 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
20
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP03851D | A black metal mask (0.16 cm2) was used over the square solar cell active area (0.5 cm2) to reduce the influence of scattered light.Photovoltaic parameters including Jsc, Voc, fill factor (FF), and power conversion efficiency (PCE) were extracted from the photocurrent–voltage (J–V) curves of the solar cells and are listed in Table 1. | What is the value of active area? | 19351 |
{
"text": [
"6.23%"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.03.173 | For iodide electrolyte system tested, the DSCs using CMS CE gave a relative low PCE of 6.23% compared to that using a Pt CE. | What is the value of PCE? | 48477 |
{
"text": [
"22.98mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
131
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.182 | The average open circuit voltage (VOC), fill factor (FF), and short circuit current density (JSC) of triple cation PSCs are 1.09V, 22.98mA/cm2, and 67.1%, respectively. | What is the value of JSC? | 1845 |
{
"text": [
"Pb(CH3CO2)2·3H2O"
],
"answer_start": [
177
]
} | 10.1016/j.joule.2018.05.011 | showed that using a combination of non-hazardous solvent/alcohol/acid solution systems (e.g., γ-butyrolactone/ethanol/acetic acid) can dissolve perovskite precursor (containing Pb(CH3CO2)2·3H2O, PbCl2 andMAI) to form high-quality perovskite thin films. | What is perovskite? | 10312 |
{
"text": [
"7.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
136
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.06.082 | It can be clearly seen that after incorporation of Ni ions into MoS2, the PCE enhances to 5.9% (Jsc=12.3mA/cm2; Voc=0.726V; FF=66%) and 7.0% (Jsc=15mA/cm2; Voc=0.726V; FF=64%) for FSG/NM1 and FSG/NM2 respectively and it is tabulated in . | What is the value of PCE? | 30837 |
{
"text": [
"4.67%"
],
"answer_start": [
20
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.08.034 | A higher η value of 4.67% was obtained for the co-sensitized cell, as compared with those of the cells sensitized with individual J1 dye (3.26%) or the N719 dye (3.27%). | What is the value of η? | 50562 |
{
"text": [
"H-3"
],
"answer_start": [
21
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA02976C | Thus, a ternary HTL, H-3, afforded 12.4% PCE—the highest PCE reported for the P3HT-based HTL in perovskite solar cells with its high reproducibility.We thank Dr Nai-Ti Lin for helpful discussion on perovskite precursor synthesis. | What is HTL? | 12396 |
{
"text": [
"1.22%"
],
"answer_start": [
149
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.12.005 | The optimum concentration of DCA differed for each anthocyanin: 40 mM for both Cy3G (2) and Dp3G (3) and 80 mM for Pt3G (4) with η% values of 1.09%, 1.22% and 1.42%, respectively (). | What is the value of η? | 54935 |
{
"text": [
"64%"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.03.041 | The devices exhibited a reverse scan performance with PCE of 11.84%, a Jsc of 16.83mAcm−2, a Voc of 1.10V and an FF of 64%. | What is the value of FF? | 8062 |
{
"text": [
"0.63V"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.12.024 | The DSSC based on CD-4 has obtained the η value of 4.11% (Jsc=8.60mAcm−2, Voc=0.63V, ff=0.75) while that of CD-6 has obtained only 1.51%, (Jsc=5.33mAcm−2, Voc=0.51V, ff=0.55). | What is the value of Voc? | 56982 |
{
"text": [
"14.64%"
],
"answer_start": [
201
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA09836C | Furthermore, the parallel-connected tandem device with an SGT-137-based top cell and SGT-021-based bottom cell showed a significantly improved current density (22.06 mA cm−2) and exhibited a high PCE (14.64%). | What is the value of PCE? | 64594 |
{
"text": [
"7.0 ± 0.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
230
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA04051E | Taking advantage of these high-quality pinhole-free perovskite films, efficient hybrid perovskite solar cells on mesoporous TiO2 demonstrated an average PCE of 11.3 ± 0.4% and a steady state efficiency of 11.7% in comparison with 7.0 ± 0.4% of the cells from the conventional method. | What is the value of PCE? | 22970 |
{
"text": [
"1.07 V"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | Finally, using the SDP method, a PCE of 10.8% was achieved from this mp-ZrO2/MAPbI3-based device, with a high Voc up to 1.07 V. | What is the value of Voc? | 13185 |
{
"text": [
"15.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
61
]
} | 10.1039/C5CC01939G | The film based on the Dyesol paste leads to the PCE of about 15.5%, mainly due to its high VOC of about 1031 mV. | What is the value of PCE? | 15940 |
{
"text": [
"13.10mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
435
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.03.181 | where JSC is the short-circuit current density (mAcm−2), VOC is the open-circuit voltage (V), Pin is light intensity of the incident light, and Jmax (mAcm−2) and Vmax (V) are the current density and voltage at the point of maximum power output in the J-V curves, respectively [The cell prepared using carbon coated on FTO substrate as counter electrode displayed open circuit voltage VOC of 0.65V, short circuit current density JSC of 13.10mAcm−2, fill factor (FF) of 0.61 and conversion efficiency (η) of 5.24% respectively . | What is the value of JSC? | 26524 |
{
"text": [
"4%"
],
"answer_start": [
329
]
} | 10.1016/j.ccr.2016.05.008 | The study brought to the synthesis of the “kiss-lock” complex couple bis(2-mesityl-4,7-dimethyl-1,10-phenanthroline)CuII/I, 80/81, able to significantly outperform the relative efficiency of the benchmark 70/78-based electrolyte in combination with both a tris-bipyridyl Ru(II) and an organic dye (ηrel,70/78 > 200%; up to η = 4.4% and a ηrel, I3-/I- ≈ 100% with the organic G3 dye).The work summarized in this review shows the potentiality of copper complexes as novel electron shuttles for iodine-free electrolytes, opening the way to electroactive couples with even more positive redox potentials and smaller size with respect to the more common direct rivals cobalt-based complexes, resulting in DSSCs with both potentially higher Voc and higher diffusion limited photocurrents. | What is the value of η? | 26653 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.067 | Simultaneously, DL-TiO2 film-based cell displayed high incident photo-to-current conversion efficiency. | What is ? | 40862 |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
README.md exists but content is empty.
Use the Edit dataset card button to edit it.
- Downloads last month
- 3
Size of downloaded dataset files:
6.7 MB
Size of the auto-converted Parquet files:
6.7 MB
Number of rows:
42,882