answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"5.74%"
],
"answer_start": [
227
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.07.117 | When irradiated from the front side, the device exhibits a short circuit current density (Jsc) of 12.19mAcm−2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 725mV, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.52, resulting in a conversion efficiency (η) of 5.74%, which approaches 80% of the device with Pt electrode (6.76%).It is found that the Jsc of the device with PPy CE (12.19mAcm−2) is higher than that of Pt CE (10.45mAcm−2). | What is the value of η? | 57441 |
{
"text": [
"8.88%"
],
"answer_start": [
177
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2015.03.233 | Under simulated solar light irradiation with intensity of 100 mW cm−2 (AM 1.5), the DSSC based on the Ni0.85Se counter electrode achieves a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 8.88%, which is higher than the solar cell based on the Pt CE (8.13%). | What is the value of PCE? | 30711 |
{
"text": [
"11.02%"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1039/C4EE01983K | As can be seen from the results, the average PCE is located at about 9.63%, while the lowest efficiency is 8.60% and the highest efficiency is 11.02%. | What is the value of PCE? | 14743 |
{
"text": [
"10.40%"
],
"answer_start": [
151
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.05.071 | As a result, for the bifacial semitransparent PSCs with an improved structure of ITO/PEDOT: PSS/CH3NH3PbI3/PCBM/Ag/MoOx(10 nm), the high PCE values of 10.40% and 6.54% are obtained from different illumination directions.To further understanding the effect of MoOx optical coupling layer, the optical transmittance, reflectance, and absorption spectra of different samples are discussed as following. | What is the value of PCE? | 5533 |
{
"text": [
"11.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
244
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA07008B | We demonstrated that the insertion of C3-SAM enhanced the photovoltaic performance of fabricated devices due to the improved perovskite film morphology and the increased coverage of perovskite crystals, which promoted the best PCE from 9.7% to 11.6%. | What is the value of PCE? | 17376 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
79
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.12.047 | The HOMO values of dyes were in the range −4.98 eV to −5.22 eV (below than the I−/I3− redox couple; −4.6 eV vs vacuum) () which indicate that the oxidized dyes formed by electrons injection into the conduction band of TiO2 will favorably accept electrons from I− ions (dye regeneration).The molecular geometries and electron distributions in the frontier orbitals of synthesized dyes were obtained using density functional theory (DFT) calculations with the B3LYP exchange–correlation functional and the d-polarized 6-31G (d) basis set implemented in Gaussian 09 program (. | What is redox couple? | 47309 |
{
"text": [
"Pt"
],
"answer_start": [
212
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.055 | The CV and EIS tests exhibited that the Ni-Co-Se-180 CE achieved the highest catalytic activity and lowest charge transfer resistance at the CE/electrolyte interface for I3− reduction than other Ni-Co-Se CEs and Pt CE, the result agreed with that of the photovoltaic performance tests. | What is CE? | 46827 |
{
"text": [
"0.3 V"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.07.079 | Solar cells employing E3, E2 and E1 dyes yielded power conversion efficiency (%h) of 4.12 (Voc= 0.62 V and FF = 0.71), (%h) of 0.05 (Voc= 0.3 V and FF = 0.53), (%h) of 1.48 (Voc= 0.52 V and FF = 0.63), respectively compared to (%h) of 7.64 for N719 (Jsc= 15.9 mA cm−2, Voc= 0.73 and FF = 0.66). | What is the value of Voc? | 57162 |
{
"text": [
"0.75 V"
],
"answer_start": [
149
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2009.05.028 | 1.5 solar condition, the JK-89 sensitized cell gave a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 13.02 mA cm−2, as an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.75 V, and a fill factor of 0.70, corresponding to η of 6.83% (). | What is the value of Voc? | 45254 |
{
"text": [
"0.96 V"
],
"answer_start": [
200
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR08797G | The devices with the PEDOT:PSS-only layer exhibited an overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 9.38% with a short-circuit current density (JSC) of 15.82 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.96 V, and a fill factor (FF) of 62%. | What is the value of VOC? | 20333 |
{
"text": [
"1.03 V"
],
"answer_start": [
89
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.05.028 | At the precursor ratio of 1:0.6, the average PCE, Jsc and Voc are 0.75%, 1.04 mA/cm2 and 1.03 V respectively; while at the precursor ratio of 1:0.8, they are 3.25%, 4.88 mA/cm2 and 0.86 V, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 6514 |
{
"text": [
"0.50 V"
],
"answer_start": [
199
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA00929A | However, the most notable feature of this study was that the efficiency improved after 5 months of storage under nitrogen, reaching record values of 3.6% (average at 3.4%), accompanied with a Voc of 0.50 V and a FF close to 0.7 (average at 0.68). | What is the value of Voc? | 21529 |
{
"text": [
"17.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA09824C | The best perovskite solar cell based on embedded 1D TiO2 NRs was achieved with MgO coating and at 0.4 M TBT, which displays a PCE of 17.03% with JSC = 22.01 mA cm−2, VOC = 1.06 V, and FF = 0.73. | What is the value of PCE? | 20606 |
{
"text": [
"0.68 V"
],
"answer_start": [
171
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2006.12.082 | Under standard global AM 1.5 solar condition, the JK-25 sensitized cell gave a short circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 11.50 mA cm−2, an open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.68 V, a fill factor of 0.66, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency η of 5.15%, and the maximum incident monochromatic photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) of 77% at 430 nm.Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have attracted great attention over the last 15 years owing to their prospect of high energy conversion efficiency and low production cost. | What is the value of Voc? | 45778 |
{
"text": [
"7.39%"
],
"answer_start": [
180
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA10677G | Under the same fabrication conditions, the best devices based on pristine Spiro-MeOTAD showed a dramatic decrease of the Jsc and FF, resulted in a considerably lower PCE of merely 7.39%, which could be caused largely by the lower hole mobility of pristine Spiro-MeOTAD compared with that of PTZ-TPA. | What is the value of PCE? | 21980 |
{
"text": [
"69.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
208
]
} | 10.1016/j.saa.2015.09.015 | The DSSC device based on P2 which contains benzodithiophene derivative as donor and Cd(II) as coordination ion, exhibited the highest power conversion efficiency of 2.43% (Jsc= 4.95 mA/cm2, Voc= 0.71 V, FF = 69.3%) under AM 1.5 G solar irradiation. | What is the value of FF? | 47338 |
{
"text": [
"41%"
],
"answer_start": [
72
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA09452G | The best TCO-free flexible PSC exhibited a 0.75 V Voc, 15.8 mA cm−2Jsc, 41% FF, and 4.9% PCE. | What is the value of FF? | 16266 |
{
"text": [
"0.815 V"
],
"answer_start": [
324
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2015.01.065 | This finding implies that the lowest rate of electron recombination from TiO2-based anode to electron acceptors in the electrolyte at the TiO2/dye/electrolyte interface is corresponding to N, GO-incorporated nanofibers due to increase the surface resistance of TiO2 photoelectrodes ); the obtained Voc were 0.635, 0.784 and 0.815 V for the devices containing pristine, GO (0.5 wt%), and N, GO (0.5 wt%)-incorporated TiO2 nanofibers photoanodes, respectively.The electron lifetimes of different photoelectrodes derived from the bode plots are observed in . | What is the value of Voc? | 38349 |
{
"text": [
"6.55±0.23mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.05.087 | By modifying CsPbBr3/carbon interface with PQDs to set an intermediate energy, the PCE, Voc and Jsc are enhanced to 6.71±0.19%, 1.31±0.03V and 6.55±0.23mAcm−2, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 6808 |
{
"text": [
"R5"
],
"answer_start": [
59
]
} | 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.07.003 | However, the Rs of Pt CE was 4.82 Ω, smaller than that of ‘R5’ SnS2 CE (9.93 Ω), which would cause the fill factor (FF) of ‘R5’ SnS2 CE to be relatively low compared with Pt CE In summary, we have demonstrated that hexagonal SnS2 nanoparticles with perfect crystallinity were prospective material for enhancing the photovoltaic performance of CEs in DSSCs. | What is CEs? | 43011 |
{
"text": [
"0.50%"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.02.050 | The efficiencies (η) of these DSSCs are 1.06%, 0.76% and 0.50%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 38975 |
{
"text": [
"9.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
44
]
} | 10.1039/C7TC04649A | Both PSC devices demonstrated PCE values of 9.0% and 9.2%, respectively, which were comparable to the leading nanoparticle-based device of the time. | What is the value of PCE? | 16789 |
{
"text": [
"12"
],
"answer_start": [
198
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.067 | Then the resultant solution was deposited directly onto a cleaned fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) glass using an e-spray technique according to our previous work In the fabrication of DSSC device, a 12μm thick film consisting of 20nm-sized TiO2 particles (Kunshan Sunlaite New Energy Technology Co., Ltd, China) was first screen-printed on the FTO electrode and further screen-printed by a 2μm thick second layer of 300nm light-scattering TiO2 particles. | What is TiO2? | 45582 |
{
"text": [
"0.74V"
],
"answer_start": [
129
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.09.063 | When NSGPCS electrode is used as the counter electrode, the assembled DSC shows a η of 8.21% with a Jsc of 16.82mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.74V, and a FF of 0.66. | What is the value of Voc? | 54324 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
130
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.215 | Impedance spectra of C2 device ( was recorded at applied voltage Vapp= 300 mV over the frequency range of 0.1 Hz to 100 kHz under 100 mW/cm2 AM 1.5G illumination. | What is the value of illumination? | 9408 |
{
"text": [
"254"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.05.058 | Then the TiO2 nanorods grown on FTO substrate were floated in the petri dish and exposed under UV light (254 nm) from a UVP company, EL series (8 W, UVLMS-38 EL, 376 mm × 96 mm × 64 mm). | What is TiO2? | 54599 |
{
"text": [
"17.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
69
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.11.237 | As a result, CH3NH3PbI3 PSCs based on 4.5% Zn-doped ETL has obtained 17.6% power conversion efficiency (PCE), nearly 27.5% more efficient than control device (13.8%). | What is the value of PCE? | 1063 |
{
"text": [
"7.0%"
],
"answer_start": [
284
]
} | 10.1039/C7EE01526G | To the best of our knowledge, this is a record demonstration of photovoltage in a dye-sensitized solar cell system from a single illuminated area.Intriguingly, the SSM-DSC system maintains high photovoltages even under low light conditions at 3.99 V at 10% Sun intensity for a PCE of 7.0% (Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 69626 |
{
"text": [
"75"
],
"answer_start": [
524
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA09452G | In addition, to pass the damp heat test for commercialization, in which there must be less than 10% degradation of the initial efficiency after storing the PSC at 85 °C/85% relative humidity for 1000 h, additional barrier layers and encapsulation processes are required because moisture and oxygen molecules can penetrate through the polymer substrate and/or cracked polymer/TCO substrate.On the other hand, metal substrate based flexible PSCs such as Ti-foil/ZnO/perovskite/spiro-OMeTAD exhibit a material cost of 50.30–51.75 $ per m2 + α (top-counter electrode and sealant), comparable to that of polymer/TCO substrate-based PSCs. | What is substrate? | 16222 |
{
"text": [
"67%"
],
"answer_start": [
161
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA05057J | Finally, Device C where C-PCBSD (FPI, 50%) was adopted as the interlayer delivered a higher PCE of 3.9% with a Voc of 0.57 V, a Jsc of 10.1 mA cm−2, and a FF of 67%. | What is the value of FF? | 21106 |
{
"text": [
"4.64%"
],
"answer_start": [
189
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2010.05.004 | It can be seen that the solar cells with electrolyte A showed Jsc of 11.7 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.63 V, fill factor (FF) of 0.63 and energy conversion efficiency (η) of 4.64%. | What is the value of η? | 40126 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
200
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2003.12.020 | Photocurrent density and voltage characteristics of the solar cells were measured using an I–V curve tracer (MP-160, Eiko Seiki) by irradiating them with simulated solar light at AM 1.5 illumination (100 mW/cm2, ESS-150A, Eiko Seiki).SEM images of the nanoparticles dispersed into the ionic liquid electrolytes to prepare the ionic nanocomposite gel electrolytes are shown in . | What is the value of illumination? | 52322 |
{
"text": [
"780mV"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2017.10.043 | Remarkably, the NiCo0.2@C demonstrates the best photovoltaic performance with a Voc of 780mV, a Jsc of 17.80mAcm−2, and a FF of 0.67, while the increase of the Co doping concentration results in the degeneration of the photovoltaic performance. | What is the value of Voc? | 23351 |
{
"text": [
"8.24 Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
78
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.051 | The Rct of the carbon/Ni3S2 (5.00 Ω) was lower than those of Ni3S2 composite (8.24 Ω) and Pt (11.19 Ω). | What is the value of Rct? | 52785 |
{
"text": [
"1.03 V"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA00287K | 6c and Table 2, the PSCs with ITO as the cathode showed the best PCE of 12.06% (Jsc: 19.15 mA cm−2, Voc: 1.03 V, and FF: 0.61), which corresponds with the literature report. | What is the value of Voc? | 18198 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1039/C9SC01184F | Fabricated p–i–n inverse type planar PSCs with the configuration ITO/TPAC3M/CH3NH3PbI3/PCBM/ZnO/Al exhibited 17.54% PCE.Donor–π-bridge–acceptor (D–π–A) type dopant-free HTMs have great potential to show high charge carrier mobility due to strong dipolar intermolecular interactions, minimizing ohmic losses of the contact. | What is ITO? | 21382 |
{
"text": [
"4.38 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1016/j.cclet.2013.01.010 | The DSC gave a power conversion efficiency (η) of 1.78%, with a short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 4.38 mA/cm2, open-circuit photovoltage (VOC) of 0.57 V, and fill factor (FF) of 0.71. | What is the value of JSC? | 49123 |
{
"text": [
"0.746V"
],
"answer_start": [
220
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2020.135631 | The examined values of the photovoltaic parameters are represented in , the open-circuit photovoltage (VOC) of a cell gradually decreases with the anodizing oxidation process from 10V to 80V (0.754V, 0.754V, 0.749V, and 0.746V corresponding to 10V, 40V, 60V, and 80V, respectively), which results in a potential difference compared to the cell (0.765V) constructed with untreated Ti foil (without using anodizing oxidation and H2O2 etching processes). | What is the value of VOC? | 53998 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
189
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.138 | The photocurrent-voltage (J-V) curves were recorded under AM 1.5G simulated solar irradiation from a Solar 3A simulator (Oriel), and the active area of the solar cells was determined to be 0.25 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 25773 |
{
"text": [
"2.70%"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.04.028 | The highest short-circuit current densities (JSC=7.85 and 7.60mAcm−2) and photoconversion efficiencies (η=2.64 and 2.70% relative to 6.56 and 6.11% for two N719 references) were observed for DSSCs with an electrolyte comprising I2 (0.03M), BMII (0.6M), 4-tert-butylpyridine (TBP, 0.4M) and guanidinium thiocyanate (GNCS, 0.1M) in MPN solvent; no LiI was added. | What is the value of η? | 30678 |
{
"text": [
"18.01%"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.041 | After doping 0.25% BQ into MAPbI3, device B affords a higher PCE of 18.01% (a). | What is the value of PCE? | 9719 |
{
"text": [
"12.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
119
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA03741C | By optimizing the FAI/MAI mole ratio to 3:2, the Jsc was enhanced to 20.9 mA cm−2, which caused the PCE to increase to 12.9%. | What is the value of PCE? | 15308 |
{
"text": [
"6.68mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2010.12.014 | The parameters in show the better performance of the thicker graphene films CE-based DSSCs, for example, short-circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 6.68mAcm−2 with an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.69V, calculated filling factor (FF) of 0.11, and overall power conversion efficiency (η) of 0.51% for the thick graphene film (i) (obtained from the graphene dispersion with the CGO of 0.2mgmL−1) -based DSSC, which is due to their high conductivity compared with the thin films, and independent of the light transmittance. | What is the value of JSC? | 43397 |
{
"text": [
"8.00%"
],
"answer_start": [
201
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA13147B | The DSCs based on FeS2 CE exhibited a short-circuit photocurrent (JSC) of 15.55 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 753 mV, a fill factor (FF) of 0.68, and a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 8.00%. | What is the value of PCE? | 68624 |
{
"text": [
"4.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA02509A | The bay-linked porphyrins WW-7 and WW-8 exhibited moderate power conversion efficiency (PCE = 4.4% and 4.8%, respectively), while the peri-linked porphyrin dye WW-9 showed a PCE up to 9.2% which is slightly lower than that of our reference dye WW-6. | What is the value of PCE? | 66372 |
{
"text": [
"17.2mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
45
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.08.010 | 1h of perovskite growth time (Voc=920mV, Jsc=17.2mAcm−2, FF=63.5%, PCE=10%) was much better than 2h (Voc=830mV, Jsc=11.3mAcm−2, FF=60%, PCE=5.6%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 5320 |
{
"text": [
"5.5"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1016/j.reactfunctpolym.2020.104483 | The resulting TiO2 films (thickness is around 5.5μm, measured by a profiler, Sloan, Dektak3) were cut into pieces. | What is TiO2? | 38829 |
{
"text": [
"GC-750-DPR"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2014.06.015 | PtNPs hybridized on the surface of the PtNPs/GNP-DPR CE can facilitate the electron conductivity in the PtNPs/GC-750-DPR structure by providing a conductive metallic network in the sp3 phase for charge carriers delocalized in the sp2 matrix. | What is CE? | 58257 |
{
"text": [
"58.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA12126H | On the contrary, a relative low PCE of 9.97% is achieved by the unpassivated sample due to its poor performance on Voc of 0.86 V, and on FF of 58.9%. | What is the value of FF? | 21254 |
{
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
],
"answer_start": [
96
]
} | 10.1039/C3DT50852H | This is more particularly blatant if one considers the redox couple I2˙−/I−, more relevant than I3−/I− for describing the actual regeneration process (cf. | What is redox couple? | 63639 |
{
"text": [
"1.00 V"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA06177F | The VOC of the brookite-based cells, 0.97–1.00 V, is approximately 100 mV larger than that of conventional anatase mp TiO2-based cells with an equivalent structure and grain size. | What is the value of VOC? | 19762 |
{
"text": [
"8.12%"
],
"answer_start": [
93
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.11.053 | As a consequence, the champion PCE of the as-prepared CsPbBr3 PSCs is promoted from 7.05% to 8.12%, getting an increase by 15.2%. | What is the value of PCE? | 3054 |
{
"text": [
"19.98mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
732
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.045 | And the average PCE of ∼20cells is up to 16.8% () and very slightly PCE decrease at a constant 1 sun illumination for 60min (), indicating that PCBM and m-PYBrZnPor CBLs play important roles for the good device performance [In order to evaluate the modification effects of m-PYBrZnPor, we also fabricated fullerene/perovskite planar heterojunction solar cells with BCP CBLs because BCP has been widely used as an interfacial material in organic solar cells and its functions have been thoroughly investigated including hole blocking, electron transporting and the damage reducing of the fullerene layer by the followed deposition of metal cathode [, the devices with BCP CBLs show a PCE of 15.6 with a VOC, a JSC and a FF of 1.02V, 19.98mA/cm2 and 76.0%, respectively. | What is the value of JSC? | 3245 |
{
"text": [
"20.41 Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
64
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.10.019 | Among the coal-based carbon CEs, PCP-G exhibits the lowest Rct (20.41 Ω) suggesting the highest catalytic activation toward I3- reduction.Pt was the most commonly used noble metal catalyst for CEs. | What is the value of Rct? | 30166 |
{
"text": [
"1 Sun"
],
"answer_start": [
247
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.020 | The spot cells were tested with air mass index 1.5 using a solar simulator (LCS-100 Oriel 94011A, Newport); the light intensity was adjusted with a reference cell in silicon (Oriel 91150V, Newport) in order to have a light intensity of 1000 W/m2 (1 Sun). | What is the value of solar? | 49043 |
{
"text": [
"5.57%"
],
"answer_start": [
227
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.05.060 | When D149 dye-sensitized nanocrystalline TiO2 film is used as the photoanode, DSSC based on PANI CE electropolymerized under the optimized H2SO4 concentration of 0.35M can achieve a solar-to-energy conversion efficiency (η) of 5.57%, which is competitive to the number of 6.00% for a Pt CE-based solar cell. | What is the value of η? | 53394 |
{
"text": [
"71.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
146
]
} | 10.1016/j.tetlet.2011.09.116 | An overall photon-to-electron conversion efficiency of 1.8% was achieved with the DSSC based on the dye TCT-1(Jsc= 3.33 mA/cm2, Voc= 757 mV, FF = 71.8%) under AM 1.5G illumination (100 mW/cm2).Dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) have been intensively investigated in the past decades as the third generation solar cell due to their simple fabrication process and low production cost. | What is the value of FF? | 29220 |
{
"text": [
"0.27%"
],
"answer_start": [
331
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2005.04.008 | A N-octadecylindolium derivative showed the best performance: the incident photon-to-current efficiency (IPCE) 38.0% at absorption maximum (λmax) 423 nm, short circuit photocurrent density (Isc) 1.116 mA cm−2, open circuit photovoltage (Voc) 0.421 V, fill factor (ff) 0.57, and solar-light-to-electricity conversion efficiency (η) 0.27%, respectively.Survey of sensitizers for dye-sensitized solar cell is of significance to prepare solar battery Melting points were measured with a Yanagimoto MP-52 micro-melting-point apparatus. | What is the value of η? | 57566 |
{
"text": [
"3.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
137
]
} | 10.1039/C2TA00719C | As a result of the introduction of the CB counter electrode, the M−/T2-based cell achieved an efficiency (η) of 4.1% compared to an η of 3.1% for the T−/T2-based cell. | What is the value of η? | 64636 |
{
"text": [
"8.77%"
],
"answer_start": [
163
]
} | 10.1016/j.cplett.2016.12.036 | The best device based on TBABF4-doped PCBM delivered a power conversion efficiency (PCE) up to 13.41%, which was superior to the one with undoped PCBM layer (PCE= 8.77%).Hybrid organic–inorganic lead halide perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have drawn a great deal of attention due to several advantages, such as solution-process, large area production, and high power conversion efficiency (PCE). | What is the value of PCE? | 10443 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
134
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.09.138 | shows the AFM images of the surface of CuSCN, CuSCN/CH3NH3PbI3, CuSCN/CH3NH3PbI3/PCBM, and CuSCN/CH3NH3PbI3/PCBM/PDINO spin-coated on ITO substrate, as measured in air. | What is ? | 8374 |
{
"text": [
"1.87%"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA13128C | This result agrees with both UV-visible analysis and DSSC test results, which show higher optical absorption (0.37) and higher PCE (1.87%) when higher citrate concentrations were used in the growth solution. | What is the value of PCE? | 63788 |
{
"text": [
"8.02%"
],
"answer_start": [
21
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.103860 | Finally, PCEs up to 18.02% on rigid substrates with an active area of 1cm2 and 17.26% on flexible devices with an area of 0.08cm2 were achieved (e). | What is the value of PCE? | 8758 |
{
"text": [
"EA"
],
"answer_start": [
23
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.154 | Electrolytes E00, E01, EA and EM were not plotted being quite far from the linearity.Finally, the long-term stability test performed on a cell containing the electrolyte composition E08 that gave the highest conversion efficiency is reported in . | What is Electrolyte? | 54447 |
{
"text": [
"5.53%"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1016/j.flatc.2018.02.002 | A clear enhancement in the FF value was observed after the SOCl2 treatment and thus resulted in an improved PCE (now 5.53%). | What is the value of PCE? | 35113 |
{
"text": [
"29 ± 1%"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.09.024 | Interestingly, the NiO based p-type DSSC fabricated with C2 carrying electron withdrawing N,N-diethyl thiobarbituric acid displayed VOC as 59 ± 4 mV and FF as 29 ± 1%, which are higher than that of benchmark reference P1. | What is the value of FF? | 26001 |
{
"text": [
"1.06 V"
],
"answer_start": [
113
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA11361K | 3a, the PSC device based on an undoped ACE-QA-ACE HTM achieved a record PCE of 18.2% (Jsc = 22.41 mA cm−2, Voc = 1.06 V and FF = 77%), whereas lower PCEs were achieved by the devices that used TPA-QA-TPA and DPA-QA-DPA HTMs under similar conditions. | What is the value of Voc? | 13546 |
{
"text": [
"15.73%"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.09.052 | With perovskite bandgap ranging from 1.65 eV~1.69 eV, the corresponding PCE increased from 15.73% to 19.84%, mainly due to the increases of Jsc from 13.88 to 15.08 mA/cm2, FF from 70.45% to 76.98%, and Voc increasing from 1.609 to 1.709 V. | What is the value of PCE? | 4780 |
{
"text": [
"9.88mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.12.143 | The quasi-solid-state DSSCs based on FNE57 produced a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 9.88mAcm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 689mV, and a fill factor (FF) of 0.72, corresponding to a PCE of 4.90%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 54564 |
{
"text": [
"silver"
],
"answer_start": [
13
]
} | 10.1039/C6TC01781A | Finally, the silver electrode was thermally evaporated at 10−6 bar. | What is electrode? | 21348 |
{
"text": [
"17.24±0.87%"
],
"answer_start": [
227
]
} | 10.1016/j.spmi.2018.03.051 | Therefore, the Y-doping perovskite solar cells using the Y/Ti molar ratios of 3% in the hydrothermal grown solution achieved the best PCE of 18.11% with Jsc of 22.50mAcm−2, Voc of 1.06V, and FF of 76.16% and the average PCE of 17.24±0.87% with Jsc of 22.23±0.63mAcm−2, Voc of 1.05±0.02V, and FF of 74.60±1.56%. | What is the value of PCE? | 1573 |
{
"text": [
"4.01%"
],
"answer_start": [
403
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.11.040 | The overall conversion efficiency (η) of a DSSC is determined by the photocurrent density measured in the short circuit (JSC), open circuit photovoltage (VOC), fill factor of the cell (FF), and intensity of incident light (Pin) TPA3T3A produced a JSC of 14.6mA/cm2, a VOC of 0.598V, a FF of 61.55%, corresponding to a η of 5.27%, which was better than TPA3T1A (JSC=12.66mA/cm2, VOC=0.561V, FF=56.58%, η=4.01%) and TPA3T2A (JSC=12.84mA/cm2, VOC=0.583V, FF=61.29%, η=4.601%). | What is the value of η? | 42363 |
{
"text": [
"0.58"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1039/C8CS00029H | 37d, orange bars) showed In2Se3 to be the most efficient buffer layer enhancing the photocurrent generation by about 120% and increasing the PCE from 0.58% for binary TiO2/CIS photoanode to 1.35% for TiO2/In2Se3/CIS heterostructure. | What is CE? | 65821 |
{
"text": [
"18.26 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
63
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.007 | The most distinguished PCE of 12.41% was yielded with a Jsc of 18.26 mA/cm2, a Voc of 0.99 V, a FF of 68.6% at the doping ratio of 1/4. | What is the value of Jsc? | 3650 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.01.084 | The external quantum efficiency (EQE) of <FTO/TiO2/CH3NH3PbI3/B-rGO (20%) paper/FTO> (best) device is shown in (f). | What is FTO? | 3819 |
{
"text": [
"488 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1039/C0NJ00585A | The Voc values for OH1, OH2, OH4, OH7, and OH17 are 508, 548, 470, 520, and 488 mV, respectively, depending largely on the sort of the dyes. | What is the value of Voc? | 74471 |
{
"text": [
"840mV"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.02.041 | As a result, for IQ4 and IQ22, the Jsc and Voc increased from 13.30mAcm−2 and 810mV to 15.32mAcm−2 and 840mV, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 24633 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
419
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.04.005 | The insertion of a terthiophene ring in the antenna of the ancillary ligand results in more extended conjugation of the molecule and consequently the suppression of dye aggregation on the TiO2 film during the dye uptake process [Conditions: sealed cells; coadsorber, DCA 20mM; photoelectrode, TiO2 (15μm thickness and 0.18cm2); electrolyte, 0.6M DMPII, 0.1M LiI, 0.05 I2 in HI-30; irradiated light, AM 1.5 solar light (100mWcm−2). | What is the value of solar? | 53982 |
{
"text": [
"17.37%"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.041 | Among them, device A is regarded as a reference, giving a PCE of 17.37%. | What is the value of PCE? | 9715 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
33
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.05.119 | The incident light intensity was 100mWcm−2 (AM 1.5). | What is the value of light intensity? | 45263 |
{
"text": [
"0.16cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.05.025 | The active area of the working electrode was about 0.16cm2 with a black mask wrapping around the electrode and its lateral sides to avoid spurious light influence. | What is the value of active area? | 48142 |
{
"text": [
"7.58Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2016.07.086 | Cu/Pt film shows a higher J0 of 1.70mAcm−2 and a lower Rct of 7.58Ωcm2, indicating its superior electrocatalytic ability, which is even better than that of Pt counter electrode (J0=1.21mAcm−2 and Rct=11.60Ωcm2).The comparison of the photovoltaic performances of P25, Cu/P25 DSSCs with Pt and Cu/Pt counter electrodes is shown in a. | What is the value of Rct? | 30534 |
{
"text": [
"50"
],
"answer_start": [
486
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR05207F | Each of these nanostructures exhibits unique optical and electronic properties.Precise control of the components, geometrical factors and morphology of the ETL may be an efficient method for further improving the performance of these devices but it requires a deeper understanding of the electron transporting mechanism in PSCs, especially at the perovskite/ETL interface.This study was partly financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61177020 and 61575005), the National Fund for Fostering Talents of Basic Science (NFFTBS) (J1030310) and Zhong Xia Multi-university Undergraduate Research Opportunity Scholarship. | What is ? | 20251 |
{
"text": [
"0.89 V"
],
"answer_start": [
168
]
} | 10.1039/C5NR04076K | The device containing as-prepared OA-TiO2 NRs as electron acceptors showed an improved power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.97% with an open circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.89 V, a JSC of 12.7 mA cm−2, and an FF of 0.53, which are higher than the corresponding values for a planar CH3NH3PbI3 perovskite solar cell with a PCE of 4.01%, a VOC of 0.87 V, a JSC of 11.2 mA cm−2 and an FF of 0.40, respectively. | What is the value of VOC? | 22049 |
{
"text": [
"0.16cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
44
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227121 | The active area of each cell was limited to 0.16cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 49622 |
{
"text": [
"12.69 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
100
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2011.08.014 | Among thefour dyes, HO exhibits the maximum power conversion efficiency of 5.83% (Voc= 0.65 V, Jsc= 12.69 mA/cm2, FF = 0.707) under simulated AM 1.5 irradiation (100 mW/cm2).► We synthesized four hydrazone dyes with different thiophene-derived bridges to apply in DSSCs. | What is the value of Jsc? | 43659 |
{
"text": [
"2.44%"
],
"answer_start": [
82
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.059 | As shown in b, compare to the rear η of 1.78% for the DSSC based pure PANi CE and 2.44% from a pristine Pt-based cell, a higher rear η of 3.40% is recorded for the DSSC with PANi-6 wt‰ MoS2 complex CE. | What is the value of η? | 56870 |
{
"text": [
"0.68 ± 0.01 V"
],
"answer_start": [
58
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.03.054 | On the other hand, the VOC, JSC, FF and η for Cell-B were 0.68 ± 0.01 V, 15.04 ± 0.04 mA cm−2, 0.60 ± 0.01%, 6.11 ± 0.02%. | What is the value of VOC? | 50261 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
159
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2010.12.032 | This could be due to the films absorbing more photons because of higher dye loading in the RTA-derived TiO2 thin films.TiO2 thin films were synthesized on the FTO-coated glass substrate by the sol–gel method and crystallized by CTA and RTA methods. | What is substrate? | 46781 |
{
"text": [
"1.024 V"
],
"answer_start": [
171
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.10.003 | In comparison to the performance of the undoped TiO2, the 2 mol% Zr-doped TiO2 based devices exhibited a lower hysteresis and an increased PCE over 15% with a high Voc of 1.024 V, a Jsc of 19.35 mA/cm2 and a FF of 0.76. | What is the value of Voc? | 10957 |
{
"text": [
"0.15 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA06705K | The J–V curves of all devices were measured, with active area of 0.15 cm2. | What is the value of active area? | 64784 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
258
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2018.09.090 | Considering the very high catalytic activity of the CNTf-CEs, the absence of substantial recombination at points of micro-contact between electrodes must be due to the efficient charge transfer and the rapid diffusion of the injected electrons into the bulk TiO2.Overall, CNTf-DSSCs featured slightly superior efficiencies to those of the Pt-DSSCs, reaching values as high as 8.8% compared to 8.7% in Pt-DSSCs. | What is ? | 52149 |
{
"text": [
"0.94 V"
],
"answer_start": [
187
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA27146D | For the Cd2SnO4-based device, the performance shows a PCE of 15.58%, Voc of 0.99 V, Jsc of 21.24 mA cm−2, and FF of 73.83% for the reverse scanning direction, and a PCE of 14.06%, Voc of 0.94 V, Jsc of 20.79 mA cm−2, and FF of 72.2% for the forward scanning direction. | What is the value of Voc? | 19728 |
{
"text": [
"784 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
179
]
} | 10.1039/C1CP21833F | 6 and Table 2, with a moderate film thickness (∼7.5 μm), the photovoltaic characteristics of device A with conventional Degussa P25 electrode are open-circuit photovoltage (Voc), 784 mV; short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc), 9.90 mA cm−2; fill factor (FF), 0.68; and overall conversion efficiency (η), 5.30%, while those of device B with synthesized TiO2 nanocomposite electrode are Voc, 754 mV; Jsc, 12.52 mA cm−2; FF, 0.66; and η, 6.23%. | What is the value of Voc? | 62959 |
{
"text": [
"60"
],
"answer_start": [
2
]
} | 10.1039/C1RA00215E | A 60 μm thick hot melt ionomer film (Surlyn, SX1170-60 from Solarnix) was sandwiched between the TiO2 photo electrode and Pt counter electrode by heating at 120 °C for a few seconds. | What is TiO2? | 75886 |
{
"text": [
"0.68%"
],
"answer_start": [
257
]
} | 10.1039/C9NJ01970G | In the Co(Phen)32+ electrolyte, MY-102 dye shows JSC = 10.24 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.898 V and fill factor (ff) = 0.72% with an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 6.62% as compared to TA-St-CA which shows JSC = 9.36 mA cm−2, VOC = 0.775 V and fill factor (ff) = 0.68% with an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 4.93%. | What is the value of ff? | 67331 |
{
"text": [
"50%"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
} | 10.1039/C5CP07687K | However, an appreciated value of FF (∼50%) furnished by device (c) is indicative of facilitated diffusion of electrolyte in the photoanode as compared to the ZnO PNP based photoanode. | What is the value of FF? | 72851 |
{
"text": [
"0.92V"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.08.077 | When the Al2O3 soaking time is 30min, the as-fabricated perovskite solar cells exhibit the best PCE of ∼12.79% (Jsc=21.56mAcm−2, Voc=0.92V, FF=0.64). | What is the value of Voc? | 6041 |
{
"text": [
"0.20 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
47
]
} | 10.1039/C9NR02903F | The sintered TiO2 film (with an active area of 0.20 cm2) was immersed in a solution of 5 × 10−4 M N719 dye with ACN and tBA (volume ratio of 1:1) as the solvent at room temperature for 24 h. | What is the value of active area? | 63612 |
{
"text": [
"13.93%"
],
"answer_start": [
30
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.03.020 | The peak PCEs were 13.32% and 13.93% for pero-SCs based on PDTSTTz and PDTSTTz-4, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 4044 |