answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"5.65mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1016/j.tet.2015.04.089 | The DSSCs sensitized with the dyes 6a and 6b have exhibited relatively high η values 1.31% (JSC=3.96mAcm−2, VOC=516mV, ff=0.64) and 1.97% (JSC=5.65mAcm−2, VOC=564mV, ff=0.62), respectively. | What is the value of JSC? | 31313 |
{
"text": [
"15.03 mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
46
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2016.06.094 | As a result, an efficiency of 8.94% with Jsc= 15.03 mAcm−2,Voc= 805 mV, and FF= 74.32% is achieved. | What is the value of Jsc? | 36538 |
{
"text": [
"0.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.11.006 | Accordingly, the overall efficiency of complex 10 was very low (η= 0.1%), while in the case of complex 11 an overall energy conversion efficiency of 1.6% was obtained. | What is the value of η? | 28079 |
{
"text": [
"0.86 V"
],
"answer_start": [
171
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE02510A | The inverted devices with UV-ozone treated (10 min) ZnO–PVP nanocomposite CBLs and PDTG-TPD:PC71BM active layers showed a PCE of 8.1% with a Jsc of 14.0 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.86 V, and a FF of 67.3%. | What is the value of Voc? | 73199 |
{
"text": [
"15.07%"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.187 | The highest PCE of cl-SnO2 cell via SnCl4 treatment is 15.07%, which is higher than PCE of cl-TiO2 device fabricated with same mp-TiO2 layer and sequence deposition. | What is the value of PCE? | 3335 |
{
"text": [
"Ag"
],
"answer_start": [
128
]
} | 10.1039/C5EE02194D | Although several papers have reported PrSCs that use flexible transparent conducting electrodes (e.g., aluminum-doped ZnO (AZO)/Ag/AZO and PEDOT:PSS) instead of FTO or ITO, PCEs of the flexible devices were lower than rigid devices due to inferior electrical and optical properties of flexible electrodes. | What is ITO? | 19953 |
{
"text": [
"6.21%"
],
"answer_start": [
95
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.050 | The Cl doped cubic CsPbBr3(Cl) perovskite solar cell exhibits a Jsc of 8.47mAcm−2 and a PCE of 6.21%, superior to that of pure orthorhombic CsPbBr3 (6.22mAcm−2 and 3.78%). | What is the value of PCE? | 6244 |
{
"text": [
"3.01%"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2015.11.012 | Due to improved light absorption on TiO2 film, pyrene-based DH-9 also gave out a satisfactory efficiency result of 3.01% with a Jsc of 7.06 mA cm−2 and a Voc of 0.62 V; meanwhile, triphenylamin-based DH-7 and fluorene-based DH-8 only gave low PCE of 2.06% and 2.39%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 41701 |
{
"text": [
"16.47%"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA03541E | The PCE for the doped HTL is significantly higher than those for the individual components, i.e., 16.47% and 9.29% for PEDOT:PSS and NiPcS4, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 22513 |
{
"text": [
"2.46%"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.12.051 | The values of Voc, Jsc, FF, and PCE of the perylene/HI-CB-(CH3NH3)3Sb2I9 PSC were 0.69 V, 5.98 mA/cm2, 59.62%, and 2.46%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 5455 |
{
"text": [
"18.49%"
],
"answer_start": [
517
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA07876A | Upon modifying the TiO2 compact layer, which is commonly used as an electron transport layer (ETL) in regular-structure (n–i–p) planar heterojunction (PHJ) PSCs, by successively incorporating [6,6]-phenyl-C61-butyric acid methyl ester (PC61BM) and an ethanolamine (ETA)-functionalized fullerene (C60-ETA) synthesized facilely via a one-pot nucleophilic addition reaction, the average power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the CH3NH3PbI3-based PHJ-PSC devices increased from 13.00% to 16.31%; the best PCE attained was 18.49%, which, to our knowledge, represents the highest PCE reported to date for regular-structure PHJ-PSCs devices based on fullerene-modified TiO2 interlayers. | What is the value of PCE? | 15229 |
{
"text": [
"0.424 V"
],
"answer_start": [
111
]
} | 10.1039/C2RA21496B | Cells of the hyperbranched aluminum phthalocyanine chloride 2 displayed an efficiency of 0.294%, with a VOC of 0.424 V, a JSC of 1.05 mA cm−2, and a FF of 0.662. | What is the value of VOC? | 67129 |
{
"text": [
"780 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
193
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.07.036 | Moreover, to further enhance the PCE, we used double-layer structure (9 + 5 μm) by adding commercial paste (CCIC HPW-400) as scattering layer to obtain an optimized result of 8.2%, with VOC of 780 mV, JSC of 14.9 mA/cm2 and FF of 70%. | What is the value of VOC? | 32125 |
{
"text": [
"6.21%"
],
"answer_start": [
57
]
} | 10.1039/C2TA00771A | The PCE was found to increase to 6.15% from 5.13% and to 6.21% from 5.66% for phage-containing dip and spray LbL-templated devices, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 70040 |
{
"text": [
"0.33%"
],
"answer_start": [
33
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2015.03.024 | The PCE of the In2O3 IOs DSSC is 0.33%, which is a little higher than that of the DSSC based on In2O3 nanoparticles b. | What is the value of PCE? | 37338 |
{
"text": [
"12.00mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
129
]
} | 10.1016/j.jre.2018.03.029 | The short-circuit current density (Jsc) of teste materials follows the given order: 5:1 (12.19mA/cm2)>1:1 (12.06mA/cm2)>La2MoO6 (12.00mA/cm2)>Pt (11.63mA/cm2)>3:1 (11.56mA/cm2)>MWCNTs (7.75mA/cm2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 39081 |
{
"text": [
"15.32%"
],
"answer_start": [
28
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.07.083 | The PCE reached its maximum 15.32% at the volume ratio of DMSO to ACN (VDMSO/ACN) of 7:3, and the reproducibility of formed solar cells in air environment (different moisture) has also improved.Lead iodide (99.99%, xi’an PLT), Aminomethane (99.5%, xi’an PLT), Spiro-OMeTAD (99.5%, xi’an PLT), N, N-dimethylformamide (99.9%, Aladdin), dimethyl sulfoxide (99.8%, Aladdin), isopropanol (99.8%, Aladdin) Acetonitrile (99.0%, Sinopharm chemical Aeagent Co., Ltd.), Glacial acetic acid (99.5%, Sinopharm chemical reagent Co., Ltd.), Acetone (98%, Beijing Chemical Works), TiO2 nanoparticle paste (Sunlaite), Titanium diisopropoxide bis (acetylacetonate) (Heptachroma), FTO glasses (NSG-TEC-7). | What is the value of PCE? | 9383 |
{
"text": [
"15.32mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.02.041 | As a result, for IQ4 and IQ22, the Jsc and Voc increased from 13.30mAcm−2 and 810mV to 15.32mAcm−2 and 840mV, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 24635 |
{
"text": [
"14.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1039/C5CS00113G | Very high currents could be generated under simulated sunlight, and high short-circuit currents of >23 mA cm−2 and a PCE as high as 14.2% have been achieved. | What is the value of PCE? | 21065 |
{
"text": [
"1.03V"
],
"answer_start": [
180
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.03.081 | The other device parameters of the PSC are Voc of 1.07V, Jsc of 22.17mAcm−2 and FF of 77.44% clearly showing significant improvement over the control device (PCE of 16.15%, Voc of 1.03V, Jsc of 21.51mAcm−2 and FF of 72.73%). | What is the value of Voc? | 8980 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
158
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.01.161 | The impedance measurement of the fabricated device was done using electrochemical workstation (FRA/VERSASTAT3, V3-500, Ametek, USA) under the illumination of 100mW/cm2. | What is the value of illumination? | 43754 |
{
"text": [
"0.038%"
],
"answer_start": [
180
]
} | 10.1039/C7SE00474E | The restricted error bars obtained in this work allowed for a good level of comparison of the performance of the different dyes.All dyes gave working devices with PCE ranging from 0.038% for COCN to 0.126% for BBTX. | What is the value of PCE? | 73665 |
{
"text": [
"2.56%"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.05.013 | the cell with M44 dye exhibits an increase in Isc and in η from 29.7mA to 32.7mA and 2.56%–2.81%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 51541 |
{
"text": [
"0.96%"
],
"answer_start": [
24
]
} | 10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.067 | that exhibited a PCE of 0.96% Moreover, Gan et al. | What is the value of PCE? | 56346 |
{
"text": [
"8.47%"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA01017A | Consequently, a DSSC assembled with the NiS/PEDOT counter electrode could achieve an impressive PCE of 8.47% under irradiation from the front and aluminum foil as a reflector, which greatly enhances the power conversion efficiency over that of a DSSC irradiated from the front only (7.77%). | What is the value of PCE? | 74834 |
{
"text": [
"805 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
52
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.11.052 | The open-circuit voltage (VOC) of NT-based cell was 805 mV, which was higher as compared with that of NP- and SP-based cells. | What is the value of VOC? | 51922 |
{
"text": [
"~16"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.109349 | The cell was polarized from −0.60 to +0.60Vat a rate of 10mVs−1.Titanium dioxide (TiO2) with average particle size of ~16nm (P90) and ~21nm (P25) were acquired from Evonik Industries. | What is Titanium dioxide? | 48706 |
{
"text": [
"3.37%"
],
"answer_start": [
181
]
} | 10.1039/C6DT00071A | As can be seen the Jsc and Voc values diminished slightly with time for T169, however, the FF and η% decreased constantly from FF = 0.62 and η = 4.50% on day 1 to FF = 0.48 and η = 3.37% after 2000 h (data collected is presented in Table 1). | What is the value of η? | 67527 |
{
"text": [
"20.92mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.12.030 | AZO:O3/CH3NH3PbI3/spiro-OMeTAD/Au devices show champion JSC, VOC and η of 20.92mA/cm2, 1.03V and 10.5% respectively. | What is the value of JSC? | 3398 |
{
"text": [
"14.26%"
],
"answer_start": [
65
]
} | 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00912 | The fabricated device by Li-ST (60 nm thickness) indicates PCE = 14.26% which is higher than that of the PSC with TiO2 layer processed at 150 °C (TiO2-150) (PCE = 12.27 %). | What is the value of PCE? | 7828 |
{
"text": [
"0.694 V"
],
"answer_start": [
450
]
} | 10.1016/j.molstruc.2015.04.012 | NHE), which means that the oxidized dyes can be effectively regenerated by the electrolyte The photocurrent–voltage (J–V) curves and incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) spectra are shown in , and the corresponding data including short-circuit current density (Jsc), open-circuit voltage (Voc), fill factor (FF), and PCE are listed in The solar cell based on the reference dye AZ6 exhibits a PCE of 7.26% (Jsc= 15.47 mA cm−2, Voc= 0.694 V, and FF = 0.672). | What is the value of Voc? | 27822 |
{
"text": [
"6.34%"
],
"answer_start": [
226
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.086 | In DSSCs, FeTa2O6/SC, CoTa2O6/SC, and CuTa10O26/SC CEs demonstrated excellent electrocatalytic activities for I3− reduction, and the corresponding PCEs were 6.85%, 6.79%, and 6.53%, respectively; which were higher than Pt CE (6.34%). | What is the value of PCE? | 43721 |
{
"text": [
"3.90%"
],
"answer_start": [
231
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.08.058 | Under illumination, the DSSC with the GR counter electrode exhibited a short-circuit photocurrent (Jsc) of 11.95mAcm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.78V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.42, yielding a conversion efficiency (η) of 3.90%. | What is the value of η? | 39144 |
{
"text": [
"13.28%"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2016.05.032 | The improvement in the PCE from 12.21% to 13.28% is almost the same as the JSC enhancement of 7.7%. | What is the value of PCE? | 4696 |
{
"text": [
"0.12 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP06486H | To eliminate the Jsc from regions outside the active area, illumination masks with an aperture size of 0.12 cm2 or 1.2 cm2 were used.For the evaluation of the device performance, the devices were illuminated at a light intensity of 100 mW cm−2 by using a 150 W Class AAA solar simulator (XES-100S1, SAN-EI). | What is the value of active area? | 15411 |
{
"text": [
"0.77V"
],
"answer_start": [
102
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2018.03.059 | The equivalent short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 16.67mAcm−2, open circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.77V, and fill factor (FF) of 0.65 respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 47398 |
{
"text": [
"1.79%"
],
"answer_start": [
27
]
} | 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2016.07.005 | A conversion efficiency of 1.79% was obtained from a ZnSe/CIS heterojunction solar cell fabricated on sparse ZnO NWs with Voc= 599 mV, Jsc= 11.60 mA/cm2 and a fill factor of 25.71%.Wide bandgap materials alone cannot absorb the sun light efficiently. | What is the value of efficiency? | 33362 |
{
"text": [
"6.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.157 | By applying this CE for DSSC, photovoltaic conversion efficiency (PCE) of 6.6% is achieved, which exceeds 6.5% of a reference cell using costly platinum as CE. | What is the value of PCE? | 45915 |
{
"text": [
"0.1 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA05053K | The active area of the solar cell was 0.1 cm2.The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were obtained on a D2 Phaser instrument using Cu Kα (λ = 0.154 nm) radiation to investigate the composition profile of perovskite films prepared with different MAI loading times. | What is the value of active area? | 13918 |
{
"text": [
"12%"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | Seok and coworkers also obtained a PCE of 12% in a FTO/bl-TiO2/mp-TiO2/MAPbI3/PTAA/Au-based device by replacing the conventional spiro-OMeTAD HTM with poly(triarylamine) (PTAA). | What is the value of PCE? | 13230 |
{
"text": [
"0.67V"
],
"answer_start": [
127
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134896 | Therefore, the DSSC fabricated by the Co-S nanobowl array CE exhibits excellent photovoltaic performance (Jsc=18.42mAcm−2, Voc=0.67V, FF=0.63, and PCE=7.78%), which is larger than those of DSSC fabricated by Pt and Co-S CEs.The repeatability of the DSSC fabricated with the Co-S nanobowl array CE is also studied by analysing the photovoltaic parameters of ten devices, as shown in (b). | What is the value of Voc? | 51526 |
{
"text": [
"18.78mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
208
]
} | 10.1016/j.cap.2018.05.022 | As expected, the pentacene based device exhibits power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 15.90% (Jsc of 19.44mA/cm2, Voc of 1.07V, and FF of 77%), comparable to the PEDOT:PSS based device (PCE of 15.65%, Jsc of 18.78mA/cm2, Voc of 1.07V, and FF of 77%) under the same experimental conditions. | What is the value of Jsc? | 629 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
48
]
} | 10.1039/C4EE02833C | On the one hand, it strongly passivates the FTO/CH3NH3PbI3 interface; on the other hand, it helps to block the shunt paths between NiO/PCBM via the meso-Al2O3 layer with perovskite filling inside. | What is FTO? | 18412 |
{
"text": [
"1.009 V"
],
"answer_start": [
130
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA04726B | Further, the rGO–ZSO1.5 ETL based sample shows a small decrement in FF up to 0.68 with 15.78% PCE, JSC = 23.01 mA cm−2, and VOC = 1.009 V. | What is the value of VOC? | 18293 |
{
"text": [
"66.3%"
],
"answer_start": [
117
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.016 | Thus, the highest PCE of 11.9% is obtained at 160°C with open-circuit voltage (VOC) = 0.96V, JSC=18.77mA/cm2, and FF=66.3%. | What is the value of FF? | 5563 |
{
"text": [
"3.58%"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2013.11.001 | And the dyes H1 and H2 sensitized solar cells displayed relatively inferior photovoltaic performance (η) of 2.63% and 3.58% due to the lower Jsc and Voc. | What is the value of η? | 47083 |
{
"text": [
"8.03%"
],
"answer_start": [
135
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2014.09.017 | The DSSC with Ni3Se4@MeOH shows the highest power conversion efficiency (η) of 8.31%, higher even than that of the DSSC with platinum (8.03%); its short-circuit photocurrent (JSC) is highest among all. | What is the value of η? | 46734 |
{
"text": [
"12.73%"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1039/C8EE00036K | The PSC made of the pristine PTAA without doping (0%) shows a rather low PCE of 12.73% with a short circuit photocurrent density (JSC) of 19.79 mA cm−2, a VOC of 0.99 V and a FF of 0.65. | What is the value of PCE? | 14306 |
{
"text": [
"6.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1039/B210384B | Consequently, we have succeeded in construction of a DSSC with η= 6.8% under AM 1.5 irradiation. | What is the value of η? | 64274 |
{
"text": [
"7.54%"
],
"answer_start": [
111
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.10.066 | The cell based on the TiO2-B NB/anatase TiO2 NP heterophase photoelectrode with n= 5 achieves the highest η of 7.54%, superior to 6.79% of the mechanical mixing NB–NP cells and 2.13% of the naked NB cells. | What is the value of η? | 52453 |
{
"text": [
"19.15%"
],
"answer_start": [
238
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.07.106 | Consequently, the PSC based on the ACN/DMF ratio at 1:16 exhibits slight hysteresis, which may be due to the dense and pinhole-free perovskite films.The corresponding external quantum efficiency (EQE) spectrum of the device with a PCE of 19.15% was measured, and the result is exhibited in . | What is the value of PCE? | 4271 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
55
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.041 | The photovoltaic efficiency of DSSC was measured under 100mW/cm2 from a solar simulator (HAL-C100). | What is the value of solar? | 31736 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
87
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA02769E | The CH3NH3Pb(I0.6Br0.4)3 solution was then spin-coated at 4000 rpm for 60 s onto glass/ITO/TiO2 layer stacks. | What is ? | 16153 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
24
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107630 | Compared to the film on glass, the PL is quenched on PCBM:GQDs by about 72, 80, 92, and 90% for nG=0, 1, 2.5, and 5mg/L, respectively. | What is ? | 4206 |
{
"text": [
"7.47%"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA02755E | A high power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 9.05% was obtained for the DSSC device with 10 wt% CNCs in the TiO2 photoanode, compared with 7.47% PCE for the DSSC with a pure TiO2 photoanode. | What is the value of PCE? | 73948 |
{
"text": [
"2.59%"
],
"answer_start": [
154
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.12.038 | The quasi solid state DSSCs with dye S showed an overall power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 4.17% which is higher than the other dyes (3.26% for C2 and 2.59% for C1). | What is the value of PCE? | 40297 |
{
"text": [
"0.66 V"
],
"answer_start": [
34
]
} | 10.1039/C4DT03102D | An efficiency of 5.90% with Voc = 0.66 V, FF = 0.69, and Jsc = 12.60 mA cm−2 has been achieved under one sun illumination in conjunction with I−/I3− electrolyte and CoS as a counter electrode. | What is the value of Voc? | 75341 |
{
"text": [
"9.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2017.01.055 | Under AM 1.5G illumination, the DSSC cells assembled with the Ni-Co-Se-160, Ni-Co-Se-180 and Ni-Co-Se-200 CEs achieved the PCEs of 8.39%, 9.04% and 8.72%, respectively, which all surpassed that of the DSSC with Pt CE (8.07%). | What is the value of PCE? | 46816 |
{
"text": [
"3.75%"
],
"answer_start": [
185
]
} | 10.1039/C5NJ00569H | Under the same conditions, WH-C6- and WH-C7-sensitized cells exhibited a Jsc of 8.53 and 9.81 mA cm−2, a Voc of 599.44 and 604.25 mV, and a FF of 0.73 and 0.73, corresponding to a η of 3.75% and 4.30%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 72768 |
{
"text": [
"0.69 V"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1039/B716419J | An impressive efficiency of 7.13% was achieved (Jsc = 20.0 mA/cm2, Voc = 0.69 V, FF = 0.52). | What is the value of Voc? | 63125 |
{
"text": [
"1.27%"
],
"answer_start": [
269
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.015 | As a result, the meta-substituted dyes yielded a narrower IPCE spectrum, a lower Jsc value, and consequently a smaller η value.Overall conversion efficiencies of the para substituted dyes (4.12%, 1.78%, 2.92% and 0.83%) higher than meta substituted dyes (2.23%, 0.48%, 1.27% and 0.08%) as shown in . | What is the value of η? | 53155 |
{
"text": [
"0.152cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1016/j.poly.2018.05.001 | The active area of the device was set to 0.152cm2 by using a mask in front of the cell.The reaction products of ((CH3)3S)2SnX6 (X=Cl, Br, I) were obtained in high purity and crystallinity. | What is the value of active area? | 42384 |
{
"text": [
"63.61%"
],
"answer_start": [
281
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2018.06.112 | The PCE of champion NH4F-PSC with forward scan slightly decreases to 14.48% with a isc of 21.30mAcm−2, a Voc of 1.02V, and a FF of 66.65%, by contrast, the forward PCE for the device with pristine TiO2 drops sharply to 10.85% with a isc of 18.95mAcm−2, a Voc of 0.90V, and a FF of 63.61%. | What is the value of FF? | 1168 |
{
"text": [
"14.55%"
],
"answer_start": [
112
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA09824C | It can be seen that the PSC device based on TiO2 NRs prepared with a TBT concentration of 0.03 M shows a PCE of 14.55%, resulting from an open circuit voltage (VOC) of 1.05 V, current density (JSC) of 22.0 mA cm−2 and fill factor (FF) of 0.63. | What is the value of PCE? | 20587 |
{
"text": [
"8.74 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
245
]
} | 10.1016/j.cej.2016.06.061 | Although, there is a slight decrease in the value of Voc for N-10% SnO2/TiO2-based DSC compared to the nitrogen-free sample (10% SnO2/TiO2)-based one (0.828 and 0.815 V, respectively), there is a terrible improvement in the values of Jsc (6.10, 8.74 mA/cm2) which can explain the observed enhancement in the photovoltaic efficiency of DSC based on N-SnO2/TiO2 (5.01%). | What is the value of Jsc? | 39251 |
{
"text": [
"100 mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.07.088 | 1.5 G) solar simulator at an intensity of 100 mWcm−2 using a class A sun simulator (ABET). | What is the value of solar? | 1901 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
161
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.06.181 | The significant factors determining IPCE and Jsc values are light harvesting efficiency, charge separation and collection yields of the electron injected to the FTO substrate in DSSC photoanode according to Equation ]. | What is substrate? | 41090 |
{
"text": [
"8.45%"
],
"answer_start": [
60
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA06382E | Among all the electrodes, the s-PT/CC renders the best η of 8.45% to its DSSC, even better than that of the cell with the traditional Pt/FTO CE, due to (1) the good intrinsic electro-catalytic ability of s-PT toward I3− reduction, (2) the good conductivity of s-PT in the absence of any non-conducting component (e.g., the PCL in PPy:PCL or the PSS in PEDOT:PSS), and (3) the large surface area and orientated electron transfer pathways provided by the CC substrate. | What is the value of η? | 68976 |
{
"text": [
"8.42%"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA03677A | As the weight percent of 29 nm Ag NPs was raised up to 0.70 wt%, the η value was gradually increased from 8.42% up to the maximum value, 9.04%. | What is the value of η? | 68287 |
{
"text": [
"880 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC03542C | Solar cells attained a VOC of 628 mV, JSC of 6.29 mA cm−2, FF of 0.43 and PCE of 1.70% when sensitized with N3 and a VOC of 880 mV, JSC of 8.22 mA cm−2, FF of 0.44 and PCE of 3.21% when sensitized with BzTCA, once more proving that organic dyes are better-suited to work with polymeric HTMs. | What is the value of VOC? | 70876 |
{
"text": [
"15.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
178
]
} | 10.1039/C7TA09122B | Their approach resulted in uniform films with complete surface coverage on the mesoporous TiO2 layer with reduced recombination, long carrier lifetimes, and higher efficiencies (15.6% PCE) relative to MAPbI3 perovskites (14.7% PCE). | What is the value of PCE? | 17319 |
{
"text": [
"17.55 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
94
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2015.04.021 | At graphene deposition time of 1 min, the short circuit current (JSC) reaches a peak value of 17.55 mA/cm2, yielding PCE of 7.8% and showing a 9.1% increase compared to the device without graphene. | What is the value of JSC? | 38781 |
{
"text": [
"8.60%"
],
"answer_start": [
172
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.01.001 | Based on the interactive effect of Rct and ZN, TaC and SCS have a similar catalytic activity; therefore, the DSCs using TaC and SCS CEs yield a consistent PCE of 8.67% and 8.60%. | What is the value of PCE? | 59425 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
241
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2019.05.030 | The photocurrent density-voltage (J-V) measurement was measured using a Keithley model 2400 digital source meter under simulated AM 1.5G illumination (100mVcm−2) provided by a solar light simulator (Oriel Model 91192, the light intensity is 100mWcm−2, which is calibrated by a NREL-calibrated Si solar cell). | What is the value of illumination? | 40496 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
67
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA11379F | Glass slides (2.5 × 2.5 cm) were cleaned in the same manner as the ITO substrates, then coated with PEDOT:PSS and the perovskite as specified in the previous section. | What is substrate? | 20299 |
{
"text": [
"20.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
133
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110071 | Under low light intensity, the PCE is enhanced almost 100% for CH3NH3PbI2.9Cl0.1 mixed halide perovskite solar cells, giving rise to 20.8% and for CH3NH3PbI2.9Br0.1 the PCE is 19.9%. | What is the value of PCE? | 3230 |
{
"text": [
"8.36%"
],
"answer_start": [
183
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA04208E | These data are much inferior to those observed for the Co2+/3+ based cell, with performance data of JSC = 13.30 mA cm−2, VOC = 820 mV, and FF = 0.766, corresponding to an overall η = 8.36%. | What is the value of η? | 65201 |
{
"text": [
"CH3NH3PbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
152
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA04028K | It will require more experimental and theoretical investigations which are outside the scope of this study.In conclusion, a methylammonium lead iodide (CH3NH3PbI3) perovskite p–i–n junction solar cell is developed based on CuSCN as the bottom HTL to achieve excellent power conversion efficiency of 10.8% with a negligible hysteresis. | What is perovskite? | 17579 |
{
"text": [
"1.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
299
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.053 | The short-circuit current density (Jsc) and the energy-conversion efficiency (η) of the DSSC based on the ZnO-(NCAs/NWs) photoanode are estimated and the values are 9.19 mA cm−2 and 3.02%, respectively, which are much better than those of the cells formed only by the ZnO NWs (Jsc= 4.02 mA cm−2, η= 1.04%) or the ZnO NCAs (Jsc= 7.14 mA cm−2, η= 2.56%) photoanode. | What is the value of η? | 35324 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1039/C3NR06157D | In the case of the I−/I3− redox couple, the TiO2NN-based solar cells exhibit comparable energy conversion efficiencies to devices made with the P25 nanoparticles, but better than the PCE reported in the literature for devices based on conventional 1D rutile TiO2 nanowires (η = 5.1%). | What is redox couple? | 63717 |
{
"text": [
"I3−/I−"
],
"answer_start": [
54
]
} | 10.1016/j.inoche.2015.03.009 | The polymer electrolyte consisted of the redox couple I3−/I− dissolved in a polymer matrix of poly(ethylene oxide), PEO, and poly(vinylidene-fluoride-co-hexafluoro-propylene), PEO/PVdF-HFP. | What is redox couple? | 34506 |
{
"text": [
"3.12%"
],
"answer_start": [
26
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.143 | The N-G-40CEs show a η of 3.12%, which is nearly 3 times higher efficiency than the pristine-G CEs in DSSCs. | What is the value of η? | 54043 |
{
"text": [
"665 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
156
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.02.112 | Whereas the cell with 4-Mercapto pyridine doped PEO polymer electrolyte (F) exhibits a short circuit current (Isc) 2.8 mA and an open circuit voltage (Voc) 665 mV with a fill-factor (ff) of 0.52 under irradiation and the cell has over-all conversion efficiency (η) of 1.06%. | What is the value of Voc? | 58620 |
{
"text": [
"8mol/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
160
]
} | 10.1016/j.tsf.2011.04.008 | The amount of the dye adsorbed on the branched nanorod arrays obtained from the solutions containing 25 and 50 mM Zn(NO3)2/HMT were 2.43 × 10− 8 and 2.65 × 10− 8mol/cm2, respectively, which were larger than that on the primary nanorod array. | What is the value of amount? | 34196 |
{
"text": [
"868 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
147
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2015.07.021 | In addition, the devices prepared without DMF and short dipping time (1 min) show worst photovoltaic performance (PCE 4.48%, Jsc 12.38 mA/cm2, Voc 868 mV, FF 41.7%) along with large standard deviation; although there more PbI2 can be transformed to MAPbI3, the photovoltaic performance of the device prepared with too much DMF (volume fraction of 2%) and excessive dipping time (3 min) is deteriorated being lower than those obtained without DMF, it is owing to the higher roughness and lower coverage of the MAPbI3 film on the mesoporous TiO2 film. | What is the value of Voc? | 882 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
202
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP00541A | For the RC dyes, the longest electron lifetime (τn) is observed with the RC-22-based DSSC, which may be attributed to the better geometry orientation and a more compact layer of the anchored dye on the TiO2 film. | What is ? | 71215 |
{
"text": [
"20.13%"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1039/C7NR04501H | While the control device based on pristine MAPbI3 gives a PCE = 15.84%, the PCE is improved to as high as 20.13% when the Cs content is increased to x = 0.23. | What is the value of PCE? | 14923 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
58
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA12217B | Each compound dissolved in toluene was spin-coated on the FTO/TiO2/perovskite substrate, before the coating of the CuSCN layer. | What is substrate? | 19308 |
{
"text": [
"9.7Ω"
],
"answer_start": [
42
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2018.07.022 | r-GO HTL based PSC shows high RS value of 9.7Ω which can be correlated with the poor surface coverage of the r-GO HTL. | What is the value of RS? | 9479 |
{
"text": [
"15.33%"
],
"answer_start": [
62
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA07829F | The cell using a 60 nm thick CuPc achieved the highest PCE of 15.33% with a Voc of 1.04 V, a Jsc of 18.91 mA cm−2, and an FF of 78.11%. | What is the value of PCE? | 16368 |
{
"text": [
"1.07 V"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06657G | On a flexible PES substrate, the device shows a comparable performance of VOC = 1.07 V, JSC = 15.8 mA cm−2, FF = 0.70, and PCE = 11.8%. | What is the value of VOC? | 14905 |
{
"text": [
"16.750mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.12.050 | The comprehensive device characteristics are as follows: VOC=0.708V, JSC=16.750mAcm−2, and FF=70.990%. | What is the value of JSC? | 45395 |
{
"text": [
"7.41%"
],
"answer_start": [
300
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2014.06.012 | When the PEDOT film on the FTO substrate was used as a CE, the DSSC exhibited a JSC of 15.9 mA/cm2, an open circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.69 V, an fill factor (FF) of 68.0%, and a power conversion efficiency (η) of 7.46%, which is almost identical to the η measured for a conventional Pt/FTO- based CE (7.41%). | What is the value of η? | 24320 |
{
"text": [
"0.510 V"
],
"answer_start": [
428
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.06.017 | Under standard global AM 1.5 G (100 mW/cm2) solar condition, the P3OT sensitized solar cell gave a short-circuit current (JSC) of 0.350 mA, open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.350 V, effective area (Sea) of 0.482 cm2 and fill factor (FF) of 0.338, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 0.086%; the P3OT/Precursor sensitized solar cell gave a short-circuit current (JSC) of 0.406 mA, open-circuit voltage (VOC) of 0.510 V, effective area (Sea) of 0.375 cm2 and fill factor (FF) of 0.688, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 0.380%. | What is the value of VOC? | 58052 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
254
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.01.038 | shows the efficiency of an as-spin-cast device and a device in which illumination-degraded perovskite thin films were recovered by introduction of CH3NH3I layers, both without packaging or encapsulation, as a function of time under light illumination at 100mWcm−2. | What is the value of illumination? | 4181 |
{
"text": [
"2.28 %"
],
"answer_start": [
19
]
} | 10.1016/j.ijleo.2019.164061 | PCE calculated was 2.28 %. | What is the value of PCE? | 10209 |
{
"text": [
"1.06 V"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA11361K | Our results show that the higher Voc (1.06 V) achieved by employing an ACE-QA-ACE HTM, in comparison with the lower Voc values of 0.99 V and 0.95 V achieved by using TPA-QA-TPA and DPA-QA-DPA, respectively, was a result of the small band offsets and differences in HOMO values between these HTMs and the perovskite absorber. | What is the value of Voc? | 13547 |
{
"text": [
"16.90mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
152
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.02.092 | Compared to the device without blocking layer, the DSSCs assembled with Al2O3/TiO2 hybrid blocking layer showed improvement in Jsc (from 13.09mA/cm2 to 16.90mA/cm2) as well as in Voc (from 0.72V to 0.73V) resulting a much better conversion efficiency of 8.60%.Palomares etal. | What is the value of Jsc? | 38568 |
{
"text": [
"5.19%"
],
"answer_start": [
147
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.086 | As a consequence, the DSSC assembled with freestanding Pt/HGF-CE has superior photoelectric conversion efficiency (PCE, 5.55%) to that with Pt-CE (5.19%) and Pt/G-CE (5.12%); for methanol oxidation, Pt/HGF deliver better electrocatalytic activity and stability than Pt/G.GO was prepared from natural graphite powder according to a modified Hummers' method Aqueous hydrofluoric acid (70μl 40% HF/1100μl DI) and GO suspension (5mgml−1) were sealed in a 50ml Teflon-lined autoclave, heat at 180°C for 6h to obtain cylindrically shaped hydrogel, in which GO was partially reduced and holey framework was introduced owing to the etching of HF in support information), they are 11.9, 10.8wt% respectively, close to the theoretical value of 13.0wt%. | What is the value of PCE? | 51718 |
{
"text": [
"12.26mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2012.10.052 | LC3 has Voc and Jsc values of 0.74V and 12.26mAcm−2, respectively, with FF of 0.71 and η of 6.52%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 42271 |