answers
dict | title
stringlengths 16
40
| context
stringlengths 13
1.96k
| question
stringclasses 124
values | id
stringlengths 1
5
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
{
"text": [
"5.66%"
],
"answer_start": [
240
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2016.05.028 | The relative standard deviation (RSD) values of the J-V performance are less than 6% for four repeat measurements.The addition of a small amount of PITN (0.1 wt%) increases Jsc from 10.28 to14.59 mA/cm2 and η is also increased from 4.48 to 5.66%. | What is the value of η? | 39443 |
{
"text": [
"19.60 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
132
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.11.003 | However, the addition of SiO2 interlayer resulted in all the photovoltaic parameters decreasing, showing the Voc of 0.885 V, Jsc of 19.60 mA/cm2, FF of 0.70 and the reduced PCE of 12.14% (b) plotted as a function of the wavelength of the incident light, between 365–850 nm, was here to certify the above J-V test results. | What is the value of Jsc? | 9685 |
{
"text": [
"0.674 V"
],
"answer_start": [
105
]
} | 10.1039/C3TA11748K | Among these five dyes, the DDC4 based DSSCs gave the best performance, with Jsc of 13.96 mA cm−2, Voc of 0.674 V, and a FF of 0.68, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 6.40%. | What is the value of Voc? | 70086 |
{
"text": [
"13.52%"
],
"answer_start": [
106
]
} | 10.1039/C6CP07592D | The present inverted PSCs based on rubrene and rubrene/PEDOT:PSS HTLs achieve a champion PCE of 8.76% and 13.52%, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 14588 |
{
"text": [
"0.25cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
148
]
} | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2015.07.049 | In order to reduce scattered light from the edge of the glass electrodes, a light-shading mask was used onto the DSSC for fixing the active area to 0.25cm2.The solar cell was illuminated by light with energy of 100mWcm−2 from 300W AM 1.5G simulated sunlight (Newport, 91160). | What is the value of active area? | 24090 |
{
"text": [
"663 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA12888E | Notably, JY13 exhibited a lowest Voc (663 mV) and a lowest FF of 0.62 with the extension of π-bridge compared to JY11 and JY12. | What is the value of Voc? | 72022 |
{
"text": [
"2.56%"
],
"answer_start": [
223
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.053 | Results indicate that the η of the DSSC based on the ZnO-(NCAs/NWs) bi-layer structure is obviously enhanced and achieves up to a value of 3.02%, far higher than ∼1.04% of the DSSC fabricated by only the ZnO NW arrays and ∼2.56% of the DSSC fabricated by only the ZnO NCAs. | What is the value of η? | 35329 |
{
"text": [
"0.71 V"
],
"answer_start": [
219
]
} | 10.1016/j.jphotochem.2011.09.020 | The bands tail off toward 710 nm, under standard global air mass (AM) 1.5 solar conditions, the JK-206 sensitized cell gave a short-circuit photo current density (Jsc) of 13.44 mA cm−2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 0.71 V, and a fill factor (ff) of 0.74, affording an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 7.08%. | What is the value of Voc? | 25669 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
10
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA09689A | After the FTO substrate was cooled down to room temperature, mp-LBSO, mp-BSO, and mp-TiO2 were deposited by spin-coating their respective diluted paste (40 μl) at 4000 r.p.m. | What is substrate? | 19680 |
{
"text": [
"10.80%"
],
"answer_start": [
115
]
} | 10.1016/j.jssc.2019.03.028 | As shown in , η of solar cells prepared with ethylether, chlorobenzene and ethylacetate as anti-solvent is 10.20%, 10.80% and 17.41%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 4861 |
{
"text": [
"0.666 V"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2015.11.020 | In particular, the cell prepared with S_NH2 sample has an average Voc of 0.666 V (11 mV higher than the reference cell), whereas a Voc of 0.670 V is observed for DSSC prepared adding W/O_NH2 sample (20 mV higher than the reference). | What is the value of Voc? | 49046 |
{
"text": [
"7.23%"
],
"answer_start": [
148
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.102 | Adding an S-CeO2 scattering layer onto the TiO2 film, Jsc and η increased to 13.20mAcm−2 and 6.27%, respectively, a higher conversion efficiency of 7.23% was achieved with D-CeO2 scattering layer onto the TiO2 film. | What is the value of η? | 37672 |
{
"text": [
"6.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
312
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | The calculated hole mobilities of the thiolated nanographenes (HTMs 72–74), however, are several orders of magnitudes far behind those of pristine HTM Sp01.As reported by Cao et al., the free-HTM devices achieved a PCE of 8.1% but devices based on pristine HTM 72 obtained poor device performances, with PCEs of 6.1% as hole transport was hindered from the perovskite absorber to HTM 72, due to the HOMO level of HTM 72 being lower than that of the VBM level of the perovskite layer. | What is the value of PCE? | 13142 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
37
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA05286F | The imperfect coverage of CuI on the FTO substrate may form some leakage paths from FTO to the perovskite absorbing layer. | What is ? | 21931 |
{
"text": [
"4.91%"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.03.024 | The DSC with AC counter electrode exhibits a low FF (0.54) and η (4.91%) due to the large Rct of the AC counter electrode. | What is the value of η? | 56887 |
{
"text": [
"67.78%"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA06490A | The DSSCs fabricated with Co0.85Se CEs with or without plasma treatment showed enhanced FF values of 67.78% and 67.03%, respectively. | What is the value of FF? | 72117 |
{
"text": [
"18.94%"
],
"answer_start": [
101
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.098 | The optimized low doping concentration (0.1M) in TiO2 gave the maximum PCE improvement from 16.80 to 18.94% with overall increments in VOC, JSC, and FF. | What is the value of PCE? | 6122 |
{
"text": [
"1391mV"
],
"answer_start": [
51
]
} | 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.01.078 | The calculated VOC are 1057mV, 1357mV, 1431mV, and 1391mV for PCT1, PBT2, PCP3, and PBP4, respectively (see ). | What is the value of VOC? | 28542 |
{
"text": [
"5.80%"
],
"answer_start": [
35
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA26754D | The PCEs of JY25 (5.21%) and JY26 (5.80%) were both much higher than that of JY24. | What is the value of PCE? | 61556 |
{
"text": [
"FTO-PFTO-Pt"
],
"answer_start": [
0
]
} | 10.1039/C3NR33338H | FTO-PFTO-Pt shows a high PCElim (20.25%), which is higher than that (20.12%) of a Pt sheet CE and that (17.58%) of a FTO-Pt CE. | What is CE? | 71276 |
{
"text": [
"1.01 V"
],
"answer_start": [
112
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2017.07.043 | The Jsc, Voc and FF values obtained from the J-V curve of the forward scan (from Jsc to Voc) were 22.4 mA cm˗2, 1.01 V and 0.66, respectively, yielding a PCE of 15.0%. | What is the value of Voc? | 3674 |
{
"text": [
"0.723 V"
],
"answer_start": [
76
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.06.057 | The DSSC without PVP and UV irradiation obtains JSC of 3.35 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.723 V, FF of 0.674, and η of 1.61%; while the DSSC with PVP and UV achieves JSC of 5.44 mA cm−2, VOC of 0.787 V, FF of 0.706, and η of 3.02%, respectively. | What is the value of VOC? | 36147 |
{
"text": [
"8.6"
],
"answer_start": [
432
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA13128C | This is possible since the non-polar surfactant PEI tends to adsorb on the non-polar ZnO faces {0110}, {1100} and {1010} and to suppress the growth of the nanorods along the corresponding directions; consequently, the rate of the growth along the [0001] direction increases and the widening of the nanorod remains under control.As a result of the addition of these two reactants to the growth solution, a dense film of ZnO nanorods 8.6 μm long and 79 nm wide (aspect ratio 108) with a packing density of 29 nanorod per μm2 was obtained after only 5 h of heating at 90 °C (Fig. | What is ZnO? | 63785 |
{
"text": [
"glass"
],
"answer_start": [
24
]
} | 10.1039/B905831A | 200 nm) onto TCO-coated glass substrate.The photovoltaic performance of the solar cells was measured with a source meter (ADVANTEST, R6246). | What is substrate? | 71508 |
{
"text": [
"7.59%"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.11.060 | They reported that by increasing the spray time, the RCT of carbon nanotubes reduce predominantly, and at 200s the maximum efficiency was obtained (η=7.59%) (). | What is the value of η? | 27130 |
{
"text": [
"MAPbI3"
],
"answer_start": [
56
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.07.047 | Secondly, the PbS NP layer prevented the degradation of MAPbI3 by the ambient environment, via hydrophobic modification on the perovskite surface. | What is perovskite? | 4153 |
{
"text": [
"20.76mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
80
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.08.027 | The p-PSCs based on bare c-TiO2 (Al-0%) exhibited a short-circuit density (Jsc)=20.76mA/cm2, open-circuit voltage (Voc)=0.97V, and a fill factor (FF)=63.76%, yielding an overall PCE=12.84%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 12026 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
169
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2016.07.046 | The quality of the fits was judged by the χ2 values and distribution of the residuals.Illumination of the samples was made with a PECCELL PEC-L01 Solar Simulator set at 100mW/cm2, through a mask of aperture size 2×6 mm2. | What is the value of Illumination? | 23705 |
{
"text": [
"I-/I3-"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2010.05.002 | The HOMO energy levels of the dyes (D1: −5.2 eV and D2: −5.4 eV) are lower than the standard potential of the I-/I3- redox couple (−4.83 eV vs. | What is redox couple? | 31605 |
{
"text": [
"3.12%"
],
"answer_start": [
83
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.05.143 | It can be seen that DSSCs with N-G-20 and N-G-40 as CEs show higher η of 2.21% and 3.12%, respectively, due to much higher Jsc and FF compared to that of the DSSCs with pristine-G as CEs. | What is the value of η? | 54042 |
{
"text": [
"0.25 cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
193
]
} | 10.1016/j.inoche.2014.10.033 | The excited-state oxidation potential of the GS7 sensitizer was − 4.00 eV, which lies sufficiently above the conduction band edge (− 4.2 eV) The photovoltaic performance of sensitizer GS7 on a 0.25 cm2 active area nanocrystalline TiO2 electrode was studied under standard AM 1.5 irradiation (100 mW cm− 2) using an electrolyte with a composition of 0.5 M dimethylpropyl-imidazolium iodide (DMPII), 0.05 M I2, and 0.1 M LiI in acetonitrile:n-butanol (1:1). | What is the value of active area? | 59570 |
{
"text": [
"2.10%"
],
"answer_start": [
357
]
} | 10.1016/j.jelechem.2019.01.034 | The enhanced electrode performance can be ascribed to the combined effects of the relatively larger surface area and higher conductivity of V2O3@C composite catalysts.Three V2O3@C CE-based DSSCs demonstrated PCE of 4.94, 5.55 and 5.32% were obtained for AC:NH4VO3 mass ratios of 1:3, 2:3 and 4:3 respectively, which were superior to that of Pt (4.54%), AC (2.10%) and V2O3 (3.33%) CE-based DSSCs from J-V curves.Solar energy is the largest natural energy resource which can be explored and utilized much more generously. | What is the value of PCE? | 23670 |
{
"text": [
"0.94 V"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1039/C8CS00656C | The NH4Cl-assisted perovskite solar cells show an efficiency of 15.6% with a Jsc of 21.45 mA cm−2, a Voc of 0.94 V, and an FF of 77%. | What is the value of Voc? | 16592 |
{
"text": [
"11.67mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
39
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.10.010 | The LP-2 sensitized cell gave a JSC of 11.67mAcm−2, VOC of 0.73V, and FF of 0.74, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency of 6.04%. | What is the value of JSC? | 42454 |
{
"text": [
"10.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
193
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA08963H | Optimized solar cells employing spiro-MeO-TPD in a planar cell configuration of ITO/F6-TCNNQ/spiro-MeO-TPD/CH3NH3PbI3−xClx/C60/Ag generated Jsc = 16 mA cm−2, Voc = 1.03 V, FF = 0.66, and PCE = 10.9%. | What is the value of PCE? | 20968 |
{
"text": [
"67.6%"
],
"answer_start": [
239
]
} | 10.1016/j.carbon.2015.04.051 | The cell efficiency of graphene wrapped Cu–Ni alloy NSs/graphene film CE is further increased to 5.46% (Voc= 0.657 V, Jsc= 13.35 mA/cm2, FF= 62.3%), which is fairly close to that of Pt/FTO CE (η =6.19, Voc= 0.661 V, Jsc= 13.84 mA/cm2, FF= 67.6%). | What is the value of FF? | 53670 |
{
"text": [
"150"
],
"answer_start": [
188
]
} | 10.1039/C2NR33114D | In addition, improved photovoltaic properties have been reported by introducing an interfacial layer of SnO2 nanostructures between the FTO electrode and the TiO2 nanoparticulate film.The 150 nm height SnO2 NR-embedded TiO2 nanoparticulate photoanode was tested and compared with the DSSC having the only TiO2 nanoparticulate photoanode. | What is SnO2? | 62786 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW·cm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
347
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2013.11.096 | It is obvious that the voltage of DSSC with the p-n junction is higher than that without the p-n junction, which indicates that the internal consumption of current is lower, leading to the high open-circuit voltage shows the the operational stability of the large-area flexible DSSC based on sample C (with p-n junction) under light intensity of 100 mW·cm−2. | What is the value of light intensity of? | 38315 |
{
"text": [
"18.42mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
110
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2019.134896 | Therefore, the DSSC fabricated by the Co-S nanobowl array CE exhibits excellent photovoltaic performance (Jsc=18.42mAcm−2, Voc=0.67V, FF=0.63, and PCE=7.78%), which is larger than those of DSSC fabricated by Pt and Co-S CEs.The repeatability of the DSSC fabricated with the Co-S nanobowl array CE is also studied by analysing the photovoltaic parameters of ten devices, as shown in (b). | What is the value of Jsc? | 51527 |
{
"text": [
"15.67%"
],
"answer_start": [
90
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.06.013 | However, when the UVO time further increases to 30 and 40s, obviously compromised PCEs of 15.67% and 15.25% are recorded, respectively, which arises from the decreased Jsc, FF and Voc. | What is the value of PCE? | 6011 |
{
"text": [
"0.804V"
],
"answer_start": [
68
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.059 | Furthermore, the Jsc and Voc were also increased to 14.61mAcm−2 and 0.804V, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 28333 |
{
"text": [
"1.83%"
],
"answer_start": [
262
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2012.03.028 | CBZ and WD-5 sensitized solar cells give short-circuit photocurrent densities (Jsc) of 4.25 and 4.45 mA cm−2, open-circuit voltages (Voc) of 586 and 587 mV, and fill factors (ff) of 0.71 and 0.70, corresponding to overall conversion efficiencies (η) of 1.77 and 1.83%, respectively. | What is the value of η? | 58075 |
{
"text": [
"12.62%"
],
"answer_start": [
81
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.07.037 | The best F16CuPc-based photovoltaic devices displayed a considerably high PCE of 12.62% with a Jsc, Voc, and FF of 19.97 mA/cm2, 0.93 V and 0.68, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 5951 |
{
"text": [
"7.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
121
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC03542C | With the XY2 dye, having a high extinction coefficient of 6.66 × 104 M−1 cm−1, and spiro-OMeTAD as the HTM a high PCE of 7.5% was obtained. | What is the value of PCE? | 70904 |
{
"text": [
"ITO"
],
"answer_start": [
124
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2016.10.041 | Additional IPCE and XRD scans, and energy-dispersive X-ray spectrum (EDS) mapping for films of CH3NH3PbI3/PDI-glass on TiOx/ITO-glass. | What is ? | 3501 |
{
"text": [
"1.87 ± 0.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
118
]
} | 10.1039/C7RA13128C | As a result, the PCE of sample D is much lower (1.13 ± 0.05%) than the one obtained using softer annealing (sample C, 1.87 ± 0.06%).It is, in fact, interesting to note that even if the number of grain–grain boundaries is much lower in sample D because of the stronger annealing conditions employed, there is no improvement in the FF compared to the values of sample C (0.452 ± 0.002). | What is the value of PCE? | 63787 |
{
"text": [
"1.05 V"
],
"answer_start": [
85
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA10055K | Solar cells prepared by the HI step showed the best efficiency of 8.9% with a Voc of 1.05 V, a jsc of 12.5 mA cm−2, and a FF of 0.68 (Fig. | What is the value of Voc? | 19945 |
{
"text": [
"4.2 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
15
]
} | 10.1016/j.jmst.2013.02.004 | The value (Jsc=4.2 mA/cm2, η=0.61%) in NA-ZnO cell is lower than that (Jsc=6.9mA/cm2, η=1.51%) of MA-ZnO cell. | What is the value of Jsc? | 25162 |
{
"text": [
"1.35 V"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06115J | After applying the MAPbBr3 in the paintable carbon-based HTM-free PSCs, the PCE was boosted to 8.09% (Voc = 1.35 V), a record value for MAPbBr3-based HTM-free PSCs and even among the highest PCE levels of the MAPbBr3-based PSCs with HTMs. | What is the value of Voc? | 12870 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
74
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.03.054 | In addition, the peeling off of CE catalyst films from the surface of the FTO substrate after the continuous CV scanning is not observed (see the inset in The electrochemical stability of MWO4/BC was further examined. | What is substrate? | 25535 |
{
"text": [
"22.15mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.04.014 | The rGO-g-P3HT increased the EQE of the perovskite devices and thus reflected a higher Jsc (22.15mA/cm2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 10061 |
{
"text": [
"0.71 V"
],
"answer_start": [
138
]
} | 10.1039/C6RA10881D | The sensitized solar cell of MC-1 exhibit a short-circuit photocurrent density (Jsc) of 11.49 mA cm−2, an open-circuit potential (Voc) of 0.71 V and a fill factor (FF) of 0.75, corresponding to an overall conversion efficiency (η) of 6.18% under AM 1.5 sunlight illumination. | What is the value of Voc? | 73447 |
{
"text": [
"18.12 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.051 | The DSSC with carbon/Ni3S2 and Ni3S2 composite yielded current densities (Jsc) of 20.75 and 18.12 mA/cm2, respectively. | What is the value of Jsc? | 52781 |
{
"text": [
"16.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
164
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA02960A | The device based on HTM–P1 not only shows a higher performance, with an average Jsc of 24.3 mA cm−2, a Voc of 1.07 V and a FF of 60.5%, achieving an average PCE of 16.8% and a best PCE of 17.2%, but also exhibits a longer lifetime (Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 15632 |
{
"text": [
"ZnO"
],
"answer_start": [
108
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2014.03.039 | The main reasons for the increase in open-circuit voltage are the optimization of the bonding behavior onto ZnO nanorods and the reduction in formation of Zn2+/dye aggregates at the semiconductor surface. | What is ? | 31400 |
{
"text": [
"12.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
121
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA09855G | As a result, solar cells fabricated with hot-casting and low-temperature (120 °C) processed perovskites yielded a PCE of 12.5%, which is much higher than that of the perovskites fabricated by the conventional process (2.91%). | What is the value of PCE? | 16500 |
{
"text": [
"0.58 V"
],
"answer_start": [
143
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA00985A | The DSSCs sensitized with 102 and 103 showed PCE of 3.16% (Jsc = 7.37 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.56 and FF = 0.77) and 4.37% (Jsc = 10.04 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.58 V and FF = 0.75), respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 75072 |
{
"text": [
"Au"
],
"answer_start": [
111
]
} | 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.01.020 | The configuration of the PSCs was FTO/bl-TiO2 (45nm)/TiO2 NSs (0∼80nm)/perovskite (600nm)/spiro-MeOTAD (150nm)/Au (100nm), where spiro-MeOTAD worked as the hole extraction and transporting materials (HTM), and Au worked as back electrode. | What is FTO? | 8646 |
{
"text": [
"SnO2"
],
"answer_start": [
66
]
} | 10.1016/j.optmat.2019.03.048 | In addition, the surface reflection by air/glass interface, glass/SnO2:F interface, and other interfaces in the structure of the PSC in is assumed to be 8%, leading to the calculated EQE well fitted with the experiment EQE, which will be shown in are set to be identical in all layers in : effective density of states of conduction band and valence band are set to 2.2×1018 and 1.8×1019cm−3, respectively, which are close to the calculated ones of the perovskite material []. | What is glass? | 12098 |
{
"text": [
"353mV"
],
"answer_start": [
364
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2017.05.058 | It is well known that additives such as 4 tert-butylpyridine suppress the direct contact between TiO2 and electrolytes/hole transport materials to reduce charge recombination, and negatively shifts the TiO2 conduction band to increase the Voc of DSSCs , the Voc in SIP4 drops down compared to SIP1, and SIP3 produces 3.46mA Isc, showing an efficiency of 0.39 with 353mV of Voc. | What is the value of Voc? | 34803 |
{
"text": [
"4.5%"
],
"answer_start": [
140
]
} | 10.1016/j.synthmet.2019.116148 | DSSCs with screen-printed PEDOT:PSS/HNTs CEs have overall better photovoltaic properties with ≈15% increase in the conversion efficiency (η=4.5%) compared to PEDOT:PSS CEs.A dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) belongs to the very promising 3rd generation of photovoltaics which has several advantages compared to the conventional crystalline silicon-based solar cell such as simple fabrication processes, low-cost materials, the possibility of bifacial illumination and high conversion efficiency particularly under low light intensity and diffuse light conditions []. | What is the value of η? | 49222 |
{
"text": [
"0.51V"
],
"answer_start": [
129
]
} | 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.05.454 | On introduction of AZO and CZO in small percentage in BFO, Jsc, Voc are drastically enhanced to 0.6mA/cm2, 0.47V and 0.15mA/cm2, 0.51V respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 1836 |
{
"text": [
"TiO2"
],
"answer_start": [
29
]
} | 10.1016/j.jorganchem.2016.10.022 | The compound was attached to TiO2 electrodes under photochemical and thermal condition and the resulting TiO2 electrodes were applied to DSSCs. | What is ? | 38948 |
{
"text": [
"100mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
376
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2018.05.044 | For opaque devices, 100nm thick Al was deposited on the PC61BM layer through a metal shadow mask under a vacuum of 10−5 torr, the active area of the cells is 0.09cm2 determined by the overlap of ITO and Al electrodes.Current density versus voltage (J-V) curves were measured with a Keithley 2400 source meter in nitrogen atmosphere under dark and under simulated solar light (100mW/cm2) from a Class AAA Solar Simulator (Oriel VeraSol-2 LED, Newport). | What is the value of Solar? | 400 |
{
"text": [
"13.2%"
],
"answer_start": [
324
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.08.016 | In the FS direction, the Jsc and FF dropped slightly to 17.93 mA cm−2 and 49.39%, respectively, yielding the PCE of ~9.00%, which indicates the sign of the device hysteresis (With decreasing temperature to 253 K, Jsc and Voc gradually increased; however, the FF slightly decreased, leading to the improved PCEs of 15.5% and 13.2% for the RS and FS directions, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 3070 |
{
"text": [
"100 mW/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
77
]
} | 10.1016/j.mssp.2015.06.081 | Before analysis, to calibrate the light intensity of the solar simulator (to 100 mW/cm2), a standard silicone solar cell was used as the reference cell, and the power of the Xenon lamp was adjusted to make the short-circuit current density (JSC) of the reference cell under simulated sun light as high as it was under the calibration conditions According to the attributed I–V curves, the photovoltaic parameters were changed due to ZnO coating, . | What is the value of light intensity of? | 57591 |
{
"text": [
"14.60%"
],
"answer_start": [
92
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2019.107630 | The flexible PSC exhibits 1.06/1.05V Voc, 19.66/19.45mA/cm2 Jsc, 72.11/71.48% FF, and 15.03/14.60% PCE for the forward/reverse scans, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 4221 |
{
"text": [
"13.54%"
],
"answer_start": [
151
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227216 | For the simplest and unoptimised ITO/PEDOT:PSS/CH3NH3PbI3/PC61BM/Ag PSC, the PCE and the FF increased to 16.16% and 0.79 on the glass substrate and to 13.54% and 0.7 on the flexible PET substrate, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 3709 |
{
"text": [
"4.99%"
],
"answer_start": [
41
]
} | 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.085 | The Nb-3.5 solar cell has optimized η of 4.99%, there is a 13.7% enhancement comparing with the un-doped solar cell. | What is the value of η? | 49667 |
{
"text": [
"I−/I3−"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1039/C5CC05533D | The best certified efficiency value is obtained by the Sharp company to be 11.9% using the I−/I3− redox couple. | What is redox couple? | 75276 |
{
"text": [
"4.52%"
],
"answer_start": [
103
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2016.10.015 | It has been observed that the power conversion efficiency (η) of perovskite solar cells decreases from 4.52% to 1.28% with increases in R.H. | What is the value of η? | 10939 |
{
"text": [
"70.9%"
],
"answer_start": [
139
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA06987H | As for the device performance, devices based on Li-TFSI- and TBP-doped HTM 44 yielded a JSC of 10.3 mA cm−2, a VOC of 0.99 V, and an FF of 70.9%, which contributed to a PCE of 7.3%. | What is the value of FF? | 13124 |
{
"text": [
"2.42%"
],
"answer_start": [
72
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2018.09.034 | The low photovoltaic conversion efficiencies (PCE) (ST3: 2.29% and ST1: 2.42%) were observed. | What is the value of PCE? | 54754 |
{
"text": [
"64.1%"
],
"answer_start": [
312
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.049 | Reduced graphene oxide is a well-known two dimensional material that acts as electron sink and helps in faster charge transport, reduces recombination as well.] drastically increased the power conversion efficiency reaches a maximum value with 1wt% RGO yielding PCE∼5.76% with Jsc∼13.27mA/cm2, a Voc∼677mV, a FF∼64.1%. | What is the value of FF? | 53448 |
{
"text": [
"7.06%"
],
"answer_start": [
98
]
} | 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.04.059 | Under an illumination of one sun condition (AM 1.5G, 100mWcm−2), the PCE for B-SnO2 NF52 is up to 7.06%, increased by 26% and 40% compared to B-SnO2 NF113 (5.57%) and P25 (5.04%), respectively, and more than five times as large as SnO2 NF52 (1.34%). | What is the value of PCE? | 35474 |
{
"text": [
"10.4%"
],
"answer_start": [
40
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA09136E | 1), which achieved an impressive PCE of 10.4%. | What is the value of PCE? | 72554 |
{
"text": [
"100mWcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
155
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.086 | The JV curves and EIS of DSSCs (−0.7V bia, 10mV AC amplitude, 100mHz–100kHz) were recorded under AM 1.5 solar simulator (500W xenon lamp, NBeT, Solar-500, 100mWcm−2).The diagram of experimental procedure for Pt/HGF and Pt/HGF paper is shown in . | What is the value of solar? | 51724 |
{
"text": [
"1.10 V"
],
"answer_start": [
91
]
} | 10.1039/C8CS00656C | They found that a photovoltaic efficiency of 17.48% with Jsc, Voc and FF of 19.88 mA cm−2, 1.10 V and 79.68% was achieved for the device with PbI2 in excess due to the high quality of film morphology with smoothness and free of pinholes, and increased grain size. | What is the value of Voc? | 16582 |
{
"text": [
"5.04%"
],
"answer_start": [
129
]
} | 10.1039/C8CE01028E | TiO2 MSs/NSAs/CF obtained under optimized experimental condition (8 M, 190 °C and 24 h) on a Ti mesh substrate achieved a PCE of 5.04%. | What is the value of PCE? | 74318 |
{
"text": [
"0.20%"
],
"answer_start": [
120
]
} | 10.1039/C4RA05644B | 3a and d, for the ZnO electrode with a thickness of ∼6 μm and an electrophoretic current of 0.1 mA, a decreasing η from 0.20% to 0.10% is presented with the sensitization time increasing from 15 to 90 seconds. | What is the value of η? | 68173 |
{
"text": [
"6.32%"
],
"answer_start": [
183
]
} | 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.236 | An optimized SC-TiO2@Ag modified DSSC is achieved with a power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 8.33%, which is significantly superior to that of the unmodified TiO2 DSSC with a PCE of 6.32%. | What is the value of PCE? | 47048 |
{
"text": [
"74.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
152
]
} | 10.1039/C3RA41583J | When a 7-methoxy group was introduced to the construct CC102, the efficiency of the DSSCs was improved to 7.0% (Voc = 700 mV, Jsc = 13.29 mA cm−2, FF = 74.8%). | What is the value of FF? | 63025 |
{
"text": [
"9.94%"
],
"answer_start": [
109
]
} | 10.1039/C5RA18349A | The presence of this layer improved the JSC and PCE of the cell with 7 vol% silica rods to 20.70 mA cm−2 and 9.94%, respectively (Fig. | What is the value of PCE? | 69745 |
{
"text": [
"3.71%"
],
"answer_start": [
177
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.09.132 | T2/T− electrolyte-based DSCs with CBS cathode has resulted in a high power conversion efficiency (PCE) of 5.83%, which is much higher than that of Pt cathode-based counterpart (3.71%), demonstrating 57.1% of PCE improvement.Solar energy is a renewable, pollution-free, and inexhaustible natural resource, the effective development and utilization of which is of realistic significance to solve the increasingly serious energy crisis. | What is the value of PCE? | 48617 |
{
"text": [
"7.17%"
],
"answer_start": [
97
]
} | 10.1016/j.ica.2017.04.030 | When the DSCs were fabricated with EL1 containing TBP, the complex 1-based DSC showed η value of 7.17%, which was higher than those of the DSCs based on complexes 2 to 4. | What is the value of η? | 57348 |
{
"text": [
"0.87"
],
"answer_start": [
285
]
} | 10.1039/C4MH00236A | The authors selected two types of carbon CEs including a carbon black/flaky graphite (FG) composite and carbon black/spheroidal graphite (SG) composite to fabricate devices, and achieved PCEs of 4.08% (Jsc = 10.6 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.825 V, FF = 0.46) and 6.64% (Jsc = 12.4 mA cm−2, Voc = 0.878 V, FF = 0.61), respectively. | What is ? | 13346 |
{
"text": [
"8.11%"
],
"answer_start": [
148
]
} | 10.1039/C4TA00011K | This DSSC exhibited a power conversion efficiency of 7.84%, while its counterpart DSSC with a platinum film on its counter electrode showed an η of 8.11%. | What is the value of η? | 73114 |
{
"text": [
"0.4796 V"
],
"answer_start": [
199
]
} | 10.1016/j.saa.2014.09.121 | This implies that the charge carrier recombination at the interface has a pronounced effect as observed from the very low short circuit current, Isc, (0.3704 mA) and open circuit voltage value, Voc (0.4796 V). | What is the value of Voc? | 53506 |
{
"text": [
"19.51%"
],
"answer_start": [
83
]
} | 10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110197 | The impressive PCEs of the optimized devices (x=0.048) were found to be 20.93% and 19.51% for active areas of 0.12cm2 and 0.7cm2, respectively. | What is the value of PCE? | 6138 |
{
"text": [
"960 mV"
],
"answer_start": [
56
]
} | 10.1039/C5TA03169A | The open circuit voltage Voc varies in the range of 950–960 mV, which is slightly lower compared to what is commonly observed in high efficiency perovskite solar cells, but in agreement with a previous study using the same lead precursor.The recorded short circuit current density Jsc and FF values are 18–19 mA cm−2 and 65–70%, respectively. | What is the value of Voc? | 14085 |
{
"text": [
"16.89 mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
73
]
} | 10.1016/j.solener.2017.08.010 | The 0.4 mol% Mn:TiO2 photoanode based DSSC has a Voc of 0.69 V, a Jsc of 16.89 mA/cm2, and a FF of 0.63, leading to a PCE of 7.33%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 32840 |
{
"text": [
"6.38%"
],
"answer_start": [
9
]
} | 10.1039/C6TA01353H | A PCE of 6.38% was achieved for the DSSC employing an optimized CuS NS network CE, suggesting a 14% increase in PCE as compared to the devices fabricated by the platinized FTO CE. | What is the value of PCE? | 62012 |
{
"text": [
"CsPbCl3"
],
"answer_start": [
48
]
} | 10.1039/C8TC05741A | A similar work was also conducted on Mn2+ doped CsPbCl3 NCs, in which CsPbCl3:Mn2+-based QDs serve as the energy-down-shift layer to boost the stability and efficiency of perovskite SCs (Fig. | What is perovskite? | 16974 |
{
"text": [
"11.12mAcm−2"
],
"answer_start": [
75
]
} | 10.1016/j.electacta.2017.11.086 | Pt/HGF-DSSC has higher Jsc (12.27mAcm−2) comparing with that of Pt/G-DSSC (11.12mAcm−2), Pt-DSSC (10.50mAcm−2) and HGF-DSSC (8.25mAcm−2). | What is the value of Jsc? | 51733 |
{
"text": [
"9.01mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
38
]
} | 10.1016/j.dyepig.2015.06.004 | The cell based on SP exhibited Jsc of 9.01mA/cm2, Voc of 758mV and a fill factor of 0.71, yielded a η of 4.87%. | What is the value of Jsc? | 28284 |
{
"text": [
"FTO"
],
"answer_start": [
39
]
} | 10.1039/C8TA09382B | Then, 80 μL solution was spread on the FTO/ETL substrate followed by a two-stage spin-coating process (1000 rpm for 10 s and 6000 rpm for 50 s). | What is substrate? | 17216 |
{
"text": [
"0.61 V"
],
"answer_start": [
150
]
} | 10.1039/C5CS00831J | The inverted OPVs with a device structure of ITO/TiOx/C-PCBOD/P3HT:PC61BM/MoOx/Ag exhibited a decent PCE of 4.5%, with simultaneously improved VOC of 0.61 V, a JSC of 12.25 mA cm−2, and an FF of 61.26%.Another group for cross-linkable-SAMs is trichlorosilane functionalities which can readily undergo facile hydrolysis to produce polysiloxane in ambient air and without complicated trigger conditions. | What is the value of VOC? | 75321 |
{
"text": [
"22.92mA/cm2"
],
"answer_start": [
86
]
} | 10.1016/j.orgel.2017.04.024 | The solar cell with pristine WOx EEL exhibited PCE of 9.54%, a Voc of 0.73V, a Jsc of 22.92mA/cm2 and a FF of 0.57 when measured under forward voltage scanning. | What is the value of Jsc? | 1007 |
{
"text": [
"16.8%"
],
"answer_start": [
152
]
} | 10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.04.042 | The champion PCE was dramatically promoted to 17.4% at tmp = 120 nm, and further increased to its maximum of 18.3% at tmp = 230 nm, and then dropped to 16.8% at tmp = 340 nm ( presents the performance parameters, including the short-circuit current JSC, the open-circuit voltage VOC, the fill factor (FF) and the PCE, of the devices and their average values obtained for eight PSCs at each thickness of mesoporous TiO2. | What is the value of PCE? | 7382 |
{
"text": [
"2"
],
"answer_start": [
5
]
} | 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.03.047 | FSD102 showed similar results as FSD101, but its power conversion efficiency was slightly decreased (2.98%) even though a stronger electron withdraw group cyanoacrylic acid group is introduced, which is probably due to the lower efficient of the electron injection from dye to TiO2 and lower τe of FSD102. | What is TiO2? | 30260 |