File size: 126,126 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 2081 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 2091 2092 2093 2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 2218 2219 2220 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 2367 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 2394 2395 2396 2397 2398 2399 2400 2401 2402 2403 2404 2405 2406 2407 2408 2409 2410 2411 2412 2413 2414 2415 2416 2417 2418 2419 2420 2421 2422 2423 2424 2425 2426 2427 2428 2429 2430 2431 2432 2433 2434 2435 2436 2437 2438 2439 2440 2441 2442 2443 2444 2445 2446 2447 2448 2449 2450 2451 2452 2453 2454 2455 2456 2457 2458 |
{
"paper_id": "2021",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T06:07:00.350657Z"
},
"title": "Emotion-Aware, Emotion-Agnostic, or Automatic: Corpus Creation Strategies to Obtain Cognitive Event Appraisal Annotations",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hofmann",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "University of Stuttgart",
"location": {
"country": "Germany"
}
},
"email": "jan.hofmann@ims.uni-stuttgart.de"
},
{
"first": "Enrica",
"middle": [],
"last": "Troiano",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "University of Stuttgart",
"location": {
"country": "Germany"
}
},
"email": "enrica.troiano@ims.uni-stuttgart.de"
},
{
"first": "Roman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klinger",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "University of Stuttgart",
"location": {
"country": "Germany"
}
},
"email": "roman.klinger@ims.uni-stuttgart.de"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "2021",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Appraisal theories explain how the cognitive evaluation of an event leads to a particular emotion. In contrast to theories of basic emotions or affect (valence/arousal), this theory has not received a lot of attention in natural language processing. Yet, in psychology it has been proven powerful: Smith and Ellsworth (1985) showed that the appraisal dimensions attention, certainty, anticipated effort, pleasantness, responsibility/control and situational control discriminate between (at least) 15 emotion classes. We study different annotation strategies for these dimensions, based on the event-focused enISEAR corpus (Troiano et al., 2019) . We analyze two manual annotation settings: (1) showing the text to annotate while masking the experienced emotion label; (2) revealing the emotion associated with the text. Setting 2 enables the annotators to develop a more realistic intuition of the described event, while Setting 1 is a more standard annotation procedure, purely relying on text. We evaluate these strategies in two ways: by measuring inter-annotator agreement and by finetuning RoBERTa to predict appraisal variables. Our results show that knowledge of the emotion increases annotators' reliability. Further, we evaluate a purely automatic rule-based labeling strategy (inferring appraisal from annotated emotion classes). Training on automatically assigned labels leads to a competitive performance of our classifier, even when tested on manual annotations. This is an indicator that it might be possible to automatically create appraisal corpora for every domain for which emotion corpora already exist.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 298,
"end": 324,
"text": "Smith and Ellsworth (1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
},
{
"start": 622,
"end": 644,
"text": "(Troiano et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF37"
},
{
"start": 690,
"end": 693,
"text": "(1)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Automatically detecting emotions in written texts consists of mapping textual units, like documents, paragraphs, or sentences, to a predefined set of emotions. Common sets of classes used for this purpose rely on psychological theories such as those proposed by Ekman (1992) (anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, surprise) or Plutchik (2001) . These theories are based on the assumption that there is a restricted number of emotions that have prototypical realizations. However, not all sets of emotions are appropriate for every domain. For instance, Dittrich and Zepf (2019) argue that some of the basic emotions are too strong for measuring how people feel when driving a car and, based on that, Cevher et al. (2019) resort to joy, annoyance (instead of anger), insecurity (instead of fear), boredom, and relaxation to classify in-car utterances. Haider et al. (2020) model the emotional perception of poetry and opt for the categories beauty/joy, sadness, uneasiness, vitality, awe/sublime, suspense, humor, nostalgia, and annoyance, following the definition of aesthetic emotions (Schindler et al., 2017; Menninghaus et al., 2019) . Demszky et al. (2020) define a taxonomy of emotions, reaching a high coverage while maintaining inter-class relations.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 262,
"end": 274,
"text": "Ekman (1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 275,
"end": 321,
"text": "(anger, disgust, fear, joy, sadness, surprise)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 325,
"end": 340,
"text": "Plutchik (2001)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
},
{
"start": 698,
"end": 718,
"text": "Cevher et al. (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 849,
"end": 869,
"text": "Haider et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
},
{
"start": 1084,
"end": 1108,
"text": "(Schindler et al., 2017;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF34"
},
{
"start": 1109,
"end": 1134,
"text": "Menninghaus et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF19"
},
{
"start": 1137,
"end": 1158,
"text": "Demszky et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "An alternative to the use of categorical variables are the so-called \"dimensional\" approaches. The most popular of them models affective experiences along the variables of dominance, valence, and arousal (Russell and Mehrabian, 1977, VAD) . Feldman Barrett (2006 Barrett ( , 2017 theorizes that emotions are interpretations of continuous affective states experiencers find themselves in. Still, as Smith and Ellsworth (1985) note, not all emotions can be distinguished based on valence and arousal. One might argue that predicting three continuous variables instead of a richer set of categories is a simplification and can be limiting for downstream applications of emotion analysis models. Smith and Ellsworth (1985) particularly argue that the VAD model does not capture all relevant aspects of an emotion in the context of an event. In a fight or flight situation (Cannon, 1929) , for instance, the decision to take one of these two actions is mostly made based on the effort that the emotion experiencer anticipates, but this is not represented by VAD. Therefore, Smith and Ellsworth (1985) propose a dimensional approach with the appraisal variables of how pleasant an event is (pleasantness, likely to be associated with joy, but unlikely to appear with disgust), how much effort an event can be expected to cause (anticipated effort, likely to be high when anger or fear is experienced), how certain the experiencer is in a specific situation (certainty, low, e.g., in the context of hope or surprise), how much attention is devoted to the event (attention, likely to be low, e.g., in the case of boredom or disgust), how much responsibility the experiencer of the emotion has for what has happened (selfother responsibility/control, high for feeling guilt or pride), and how much the experiencer feels to be controlled by the situation (situational control, high in anger). As the cognitive appraisal is a fundamental subcomponent of emotions, we deem that appraisal dimensions are useful to perform emotion recognition, and that even the prediction of appraisals themselves can contribute to computational approaches to affective states. These appraisal dimensions have only recently found application in automatic emotion analysis in text: Hofmann et al. (2020) re-annotated a corpus of 1001 English emotional event descriptions (Troiano et al., 2019) for which the experienced emotion has been disclosed by the author of the description (Table 1 shows examples from their corpus). Their annotation is designed as a preliminary step for inferring discrete emotion categories. In contrast, we argue that the prediction of appraisal dimensions is in itself valuable. This intuition has an impact on our annotation strategy. While Hofmann et al. (2020) did not show any emotion label to the annotators, thus avoiding information leaks, we hypothesize that knowing such emotion helps understanding how the described events were originally appraised by their experiencers: at times, properly annotating appraisals as a third party might be unfeasible without having prior access to emotions.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 204,
"end": 238,
"text": "(Russell and Mehrabian, 1977, VAD)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 249,
"end": 262,
"text": "Barrett (2006",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
},
{
"start": 263,
"end": 279,
"text": "Barrett ( , 2017",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 398,
"end": 424,
"text": "Smith and Ellsworth (1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
},
{
"start": 692,
"end": 718,
"text": "Smith and Ellsworth (1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
},
{
"start": 868,
"end": 882,
"text": "(Cannon, 1929)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 1069,
"end": 1095,
"text": "Smith and Ellsworth (1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
},
{
"start": 2340,
"end": 2362,
"text": "(Troiano et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF37"
},
{
"start": 2733,
"end": 2760,
"text": "While Hofmann et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 2449,
"end": 2457,
"text": "(Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "We test this by comparing three annotation procedures: (1) we give the annotator access only to the text but not to its emotion label; (2) we give the annotator access to the text and the emotion, and evaluate if this additional information has an impact on annotation reliability and performance of a pretrained transformer-based classifier fine-tuned on these data; and (3) we automatically infer the appraisal dimensions from existing emotion annotations, investigating the hypothesis that manual annotation might not be necessary.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Our main contributions are that we show that (a) appraisal annotation is more reliable when annotators have access to the emotion label of the original experiencer, hence, the event description itself does not carry sufficient information for annotation. That also means that annotating appraisals for corpora in which the original emotion is not available might be particularly challenging. (b) Automatic, rule-based annotation of appraisals that leverages emotion labels is a viable alternative to human annotation, and therefore, appraisal corpora can automatically be created for domains for which emotion corpora are already available.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Our classifier further constitutes a novel state of the art for appraisal prediction on the data by Hofmann et al. (2020) . The data is available at https:// www.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/data/appraisalemotion.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 100,
"end": 121,
"text": "Hofmann et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "There is a wealth of literature in psychology surrounding emotions, specifically regarding the way they are elicited, their universal validity, their number and stereotypical expressions, and their function (Scherer, 2000; Gendron and Feldman Barrett, 2009) . The two prominent traditions which have dominated the field of emotion classification in natural language processing are discrete and dimen-sional models (Kim and Klinger, 2019) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 207,
"end": 222,
"text": "(Scherer, 2000;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF29"
},
{
"start": 223,
"end": 257,
"text": "Gendron and Feldman Barrett, 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
},
{
"start": 414,
"end": 437,
"text": "(Kim and Klinger, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Resources for Emotion Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "Next to the creation of lexicons for emotion analysis (Pennebaker et al., 2001; Strapparava and Valitutti, 2004; Mohammad et al., 2013; Mohammad, 2018, i.a.) , the annotation of text corpora received substantial attention (Bostan and Klinger, 2018) . They vary across emotion categories and domains, with discrete classes being dominating -some exceptions focused on valence and arousal annotations are Buechel and Hahn (2017) , Preo\u0163iuc-Pietro et al. (2016) , and Yu et al. (2016) . For instance, the ISEAR study by Scherer and Wallbott (1994) led to self-reports of emotionally connotated events. Its creators aimed at understanding what aspects of emotions are universal and which are relative to culture. It was built by asking students to recall an emotion-inducing event and to describe it.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 54,
"end": 79,
"text": "(Pennebaker et al., 2001;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
},
{
"start": 80,
"end": 112,
"text": "Strapparava and Valitutti, 2004;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF36"
},
{
"start": 113,
"end": 135,
"text": "Mohammad et al., 2013;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 136,
"end": 157,
"text": "Mohammad, 2018, i.a.)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 222,
"end": 248,
"text": "(Bostan and Klinger, 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
},
{
"start": 403,
"end": 426,
"text": "Buechel and Hahn (2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 429,
"end": 458,
"text": "Preo\u0163iuc-Pietro et al. (2016)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF27"
},
{
"start": 465,
"end": 481,
"text": "Yu et al. (2016)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF38"
},
{
"start": 517,
"end": 544,
"text": "Scherer and Wallbott (1994)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Resources for Emotion Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "Other efforts focused more on creating corpora specifically for emotion analysis in NLP. Troiano et al. (2019) built enISEAR and deISEAR, whose 1001 event-descriptions were collected via crowdsourcing, with a questionnaire inspired by ISEAR, both in English and in German. TEC (Mohammad, 2012), another popular resource, is bigger in size (\u224821k instances), contains tweets and was automatically annotated with hashtags. The Blogs corpus by Aman and Szpakowicz (2007) has sentence-level annotations for 5205 texts, annotated by multiple raters. While ISEAR, enISEAR and deISEAR are focused on describing specific emotion-inducing events, the Blogs corpus and TEC are more general. This is also the set of corpora that we use in our study (a more comprehensive resource overview was made available by Hakak et al. 2017and Bostan and Klinger (2018) ).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 89,
"end": 110,
"text": "Troiano et al. (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF37"
},
{
"start": 440,
"end": 466,
"text": "Aman and Szpakowicz (2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 820,
"end": 845,
"text": "Bostan and Klinger (2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Resources for Emotion Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.1"
},
{
"text": "A richer perspective on emotions and their experience than affect models or fundamental emotion sets is provided by appraisal models (Scherer, 2009b) , which did not receive a lot of attention from the NLP community so far. Appraisals are immediate evaluations of situations which guide the emotion felt by the experiencer (Scherer, 2009a) . More precisely, an emotion is a synchronized change in five organismic subsystems (i.e., cognitive, peripheral efference, motivational, motor expression and subjective feeling) in response to the evaluation of a stimulus event important to an individual. Emotion states can be distinguished on the basis of their accompanying appraisals. For instance, fear emerges when an event is appraised as unforeseen and disagreeable, a frightening event is one appraised as an unforeseen, unpleasant, and contrary to one's goal (Mortillaro et al., 2012) . The cognitive part of the emotion is the one guiding the evaluation of the stimulus along different dimensions. According to Scherer et al. (2001) , they are relevance (i.e., the pleasantness of the event, and its relevance for one's goals), implication (i.e., its potential consequences), coping potential (i.e., one's ability to adjust to or control the situation) and normative significance (i.e. its congruity to one's values and beliefs). On a similar vein, Smith and Ellsworth (1985) argue that six cognitive appraisal dimensions can differentiate emotional experiences, as there is a relationship between the way situations are appraised along such dimensions and the experienced emotion. They are pleasantness, anticipated effort, certainty, attention, responsibility/control and situational control. We use their model to explore appraisals in text.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 133,
"end": 149,
"text": "(Scherer, 2009b)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF31"
},
{
"start": 323,
"end": 339,
"text": "(Scherer, 2009a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 860,
"end": 885,
"text": "(Mortillaro et al., 2012)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
},
{
"start": 1013,
"end": 1034,
"text": "Scherer et al. (2001)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF32"
},
{
"start": 1351,
"end": 1377,
"text": "Smith and Ellsworth (1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Appraisal Theories",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "3 Experimental Setting",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Appraisal Theories",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "We adhere to the annotation guidelines and the appraisal dimensions of Hofmann et al. (2020), splitting the original situational control from Smith and Ellsworth (1985) into control and circumstance. Our judges take binary decisions with respect to seven appraisal dimensions. We ask them the following questions:",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 142,
"end": 168,
"text": "Smith and Ellsworth (1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation Guidelines",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "\"Most probably, at the time when the event happened, the writer. . . . . . wanted to devote further attention to the event (Attention) ; . . . was certain about what was happening (Certainty) ; . . . had to expend mental or physical effort to deal with the situation (Effort) ; . . . found that the event was pleasant (Pleasantness) ; . . . was responsible for the situation (Responsibility) ; . . . found that he/she was in control of the situation (Control) ; . . . found that the event could not have been changed or influenced by anyone (Circumstance).\"",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation Guidelines",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "To annotate the appraisal dimensions, judges need to make assumptions about the experienced situation. We believe this is possible, at times, purely from the textual description that needs to be judged. Other times, knowing which emotion a person developed might be necessary to understand how the overall experience was originally appraised.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 1: Manual Annotation",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "To analyze this assumption and measure the importance of emotion labels to reliably assign appraisal dimensions, we build our experiment on top of the English enISEAR corpus by Troiano et al. (2019) . Its authors asked workers on a crowdsourcing platform to complete sentences like \"I felt [emotion name], when/that/because. . . \", where [emotion name] is replaced by a concrete emotion. In a later annotation round, other annotators had to infer the emotion of the text, and for this reason the creators of the corpus replaced emotion words with \". . . \". The resulting 1001 instances of enISEAR are labeled by the experiencers of the emotion themselves and have masked emotion words in the text.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 177,
"end": 198,
"text": "Troiano et al. (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF37"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 1: Manual Annotation",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "We use these data to perform two annotation experiments on 210 instances, randomly sampled from enISEAR and stratified by emotion. Two annotators judge all of these instances in two different settings. Setting 1, EMOHIDE, replicates the study by Hofmann et al. (2020) : the emotion label is not available to the annotator. In Setting 2, EMOVIS, the emotion is presented along with the text. The two rounds of annotations (first EMOHIDE, later EMOVIS which makes the emotion available) were distantiated by six months, to avoid a bias by recalling the previous round. We evaluate the reliability of the annotation via inter-annotator agreement with Cohen's \u03ba (1960) , under the hypothesis that having knowledge of the emotion leads to more reliable human annotations.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 246,
"end": 267,
"text": "Hofmann et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 648,
"end": 664,
"text": "Cohen's \u03ba (1960)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 1: Manual Annotation",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "Computational Modelling. One of the annotators annotated the full 1001 instances twice, that is, for the EMOHIDE and the EMOVIS approaches as a basis to evaluate how well the realization of the appraisal concepts in the corpus can be modelled automatically. As we expect the annotations EMO-VIS to be more reliable, we also expect the model to perform better. 1 We use RoBERTa (Liu et al., 2019) with the abstraction layer for tensorflow as provided by ktrain (Maiya, 2020), and choose the number of epochs to be 5, based on the appraisal prediction and emotion classification tasks in the data by Hofmann et al. (2020) (which we annotate in this paper). Only minor differences in performance can be seen between epochs 4-7. We keep this number of epochs fixed across all experiments and all other param- Anger 1 1 1 0 0 0 Disgust 0 1 1 0 0 0 Fear 1 0 1 0 0 1 Guilt 0 1 1 0 1 0 Joy 1 1 0 1 1 0 Sadness 0 1 0 0 0 1 Shame 0 0 1 0 1 0 Surprise 1 0 0 1 0 1 Table 2 : Discretized associations between appraisal dimensions and emotion categories, following Smith and Ellsworth (1985) , as we use them for automatic annotation in Exp. 2.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 360,
"end": 361,
"text": "1",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 377,
"end": 395,
"text": "(Liu et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
},
{
"start": 1108,
"end": 1134,
"text": "Smith and Ellsworth (1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 805,
"end": 1017,
"text": "Anger 1 1 1 0 0 0 Disgust 0 1 1 0 0 0 Fear 1 0 1 0 0 1 Guilt 0 1 1 0 1 0 Joy 1 1 0 1 1 0 Sadness 0 1 0 0 0 1 Shame 0 0 1 0 1 0 Surprise 1 0 0 1 0 1 Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 1: Manual Annotation",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "eters at their default. The batch size is 5. More concretely, we opt for a 3\u00d710-fold cross-validation setting, use the RoBERTa-base model in all experiments except for those on the German deISEAR (in the next Experiment 2), where we use XLM-R (Conneau et al., 2020) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 243,
"end": 265,
"text": "(Conneau et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 1: Manual Annotation",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "As Smith and Ellsworth (1985) showed, appraisal dimensions are sufficient to discriminate emotion categories: this is knowledge which we can make use of, and we can leverage their findings to automatically assign discrete appraisal labels to enISEAR (see Table 2 ) in a rule-based manner. For comparability to the manual annotation setup, we opt for discrete labels which we infer from the continuous principle component analysis values from the original paper. The question to be answered is if this rule-based annotation actually represents the same concepts as the manual annotation. To answer this, we compare the automatic annotation (AUTOAPPR) with both annotations that have been performed manually (EMOHIDE, EMOVIS). Further, we train a model to predict these automatic annotations and evaluate on the manually annotated labels.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 3,
"end": 29,
"text": "Smith and Ellsworth (1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 255,
"end": 262,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 2: Automatic Annotation",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "Since the automatic method relies on emotion labels, we expect its annotations to be more similar to EMOVIS, where the annotators also have access to this information. For the same reason, we also assume that the model trained on automatically annotated labels performs better on EMOVIS than on EMOHIDE. Finding that models trained on labels assigned in such rule-based manner show comparable performance to manual annotations (when tested on manual annotations) would suggest that the latter might not be necessary to obtain appraisal prediction models.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 2: Automatic Annotation",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "In this automatic setup, we merge responsibility and control. While they are divided in the manually annotated corpora, this separation is not available in the results by Smith and Ellsworth (1985) . This affects the comparability of the averages of performance measures between Exp. 1 and 2.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 171,
"end": 197,
"text": "Smith and Ellsworth (1985)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 2: Automatic Annotation",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "Further, under the assumption that automatic annotation shows competitive results on the manually annotated corpus enISEAR, we extend this analysis to other resources for corpus generalization. In addition to enISEAR, we use the original ISEAR dataset (Scherer and Wallbott, 1994) , the German event corpus deISEAR (Troiano et al., 2019) and, as resources without focus on events, the Twitter Emotion Corpus (TEC) (Mohammad, 2012) and the Blogs corpus (Aman and Szpakowicz, 2007) . Since these corpora are not manually annotated for appraisals, we only evaluate on automatic appraisal annotations.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 252,
"end": 280,
"text": "(Scherer and Wallbott, 1994)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
},
{
"start": 315,
"end": 337,
"text": "(Troiano et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF37"
},
{
"start": 414,
"end": 430,
"text": "(Mohammad, 2012)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
},
{
"start": 452,
"end": 479,
"text": "(Aman and Szpakowicz, 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 2: Automatic Annotation",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "Inter-Annotator Agreement. In Experiment 1, we compare the reliability of the annotation with and without access to the emotion label. We show the inter-annotator agreement results in Table 3 . As we hypothesized, the agreement on EMOVIS is clearly higher than on EMOHIDE, with .68 in comparison to .55 \u03ba. The highest agreement increase is observed for attention (+.25) and certainty (+.28), followed by responsibility (+.16). The only decrease in agreement, for control, is comparably small (\u2212.05).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 184,
"end": 191,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF4"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 1: Manual Annotation",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Figure 1 (and Table 9 in the Appendix) shows the distribution of emotions for the different appraisal dimensions: for most dimensions, the annotation becomes more clearly connected to emotions with its availability, with certainty and anticipated effort being exceptions: here, the number of instances of a set of emotion classes partially increases. This confirms that knowledge of the emotion \"denoises\" the annotation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 14,
"end": 21,
"text": "Table 9",
"ref_id": "TABREF15"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 1: Manual Annotation",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Modelling. Table 3 also reports the prediction performance on appraisal classes using RoBERTa. We observe that the performances on EMOVIS are higher than on EMOHIDE (+.03pp on micro F 1 , .01 on macro F 1 ). This is in line with our assumptions, but the improvement is actually lower than we expected, given the more substantial difference in inter-annotator agreement. However, for certainty (+.09) and anticipated effort (+.18), the change is substantial. Attentional Activity, which shows a high increase in agreement, has a small decrease in modelling performance (\u2212.04). Control, which does not improve in agreement, has a considerable loss in prediction performance (\u2212.15). From this experiment, we conclude that the annotation is more reliable with access to the emotion: this reflects on the modelling results, and it does so to different extents for different emotions.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 11,
"end": 18,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF4"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 1: Manual Annotation",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Inter-Annotator Agreement. We now evaluate the rule-based annotation procedure, in which appraisal classes are purely assigned by the automatic procedure, shown in Table 2 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 164,
"end": 171,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 2: Automatic Annotation",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "The agreement between the rule-based annotation AUTOAPPR and both manual annotations is shown in Table 4 . As expected, we observe a higher agreement with EMOVIS. Again, the differences are not equally distributed across emotions and they resemble the changes in the other experiments, but agreement is lower between AUTOAPPR and the manual annotations than between the latters, suggesting that the automatic process does not lead to the same conceptual annotation 2 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 97,
"end": 104,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": "TABREF6"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 2: Automatic Annotation",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "Modelling. To answer the question how well one model trained on rule-based annotations performs on manual annotations, we test the model three times: on EMOVIS, EMOHIDE, and AUTOAPPR. The right side of Table 4 reports the results. Note that responsibility and control have been merged, as explained in the experimental setting. We see that the highest macro average F 1 is nonsurprisingly achieved when testing on AUTOAPPR (.90F 1 ). When testing the same model on EMO-VIS, the performance drops by 12pp (.78F 1 ), but is still substantially higher than for the corpus in which the emotions were not available to the anno-tators (.72F 1 ). Note that the performance of .78F 1 (EMOVIS) and .74F 1 (EMOHIDE) are not too different from the model trained on manually annotated data, with .80F 1 and .79F 1 . We therefore conclude that automatically labeling a corpus with appraisal dimensions leads to a meaningful model. Corpus Generalization. Finally, we apply the automatic labeling procedure to other emotion corpora. Results are in Table 5 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 202,
"end": 209,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": "TABREF6"
},
{
"start": 1033,
"end": 1040,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 2: Automatic Annotation",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "Given the different nature of the domains and languages (German vs. English -deISEAR/enISEAR; tweets vs. blog texts -TEC vs. Blogs), these numbers cannot be directly compared, but we can observe that they are comparably high, similar to the other experiments. We carefully infer (without having compared the prediction on these corpora to manual annotations) that this is an indicator that automatic annotation of appraisal dimensions also works across different corpora and languages. Appraisal P R F1 P R F1 P R F1 P R F1 Attentional Activity 79 68 73 83 82 83 90 91 91 94 94 94 Certainty 79 90 84 89 92 90 87 89 88 97 97 97 Anticipated Effort 88 93 91 94 95 94 74 68 71 91 93 92 Pleasantness 80 69 77 91 90 91 85 86 86 97 97 97 Responsibility/Control 80 69 74 88 85 86 79 79 79 94 96 95 Situational Control 73 69 71 83 81 82 79 79 79 88 86 87 Macro \u2205 81 76 78 88 87 88 82 82 82 94 94 94 Micro \u2205 82 81 81 89 89 89 84 84 84 94 95 94 Table 5 : Experiment 2, Generalization to other corpora. All results are averages across 3\u00d710 cross validations. Note that the last three columns from Table 4 correspond to the same setting as it is in here.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 486,
"end": 1061,
"text": "Appraisal P R F1 P R F1 P R F1 P R F1 Attentional Activity 79 68 73 83 82 83 90 91 91 94 94 94 Certainty 79 90 84 89 92 90 87 89 88 97 97 97 Anticipated Effort 88 93 91 94 95 94 74 68 71 91 93 92 Pleasantness 80 69 77 91 90 91 85 86 86 97 97 97 Responsibility/Control 80 69 74 88 85 86 79 79 79 94 96 95 Situational Control 73 69 71 83 81 82 79 79 79 88 86 87 Macro \u2205 81 76 78 88 87 88 82 82 82 94 94 94 Micro \u2205 82 81 81 89 89 89 84 84 84 94 95 94 Table 5",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
},
{
"start": 1205,
"end": 1212,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": "TABREF6"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiment 2: Automatic Annotation",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "The data that we use was made available to support appraisal-based research in emotion analysis. It consists of the same instances we annotated in Hofmann et al. (2020) . However, in this previous work, each instance was judged by three annotators, who did not have access to the emotion labels of the texts, and the experiments have been performed on labels obtained with the majority vote of the annotators. Instead, for the current experiments, the labels by only one annotator on all instances have been used. Therefore, the experiments of the two papers are not strictly comparable. In addition, Hofmann et al. (2020) adopted a CNN-based classifier. Brief, there are two sources for non-comparability in our experiments: different label sets and different models. We aimed at leveraging a more state-of-the-art transformer-based model, but at the same time, we needed different label sets to better understand the appraisal annotation processes. For transparency reasons, we show the performance of our RoBERTA model on the original labels against the results by Hofmann et al. (2020) . Table 6 compares the two studies with respect to appraisals and Table 7 with respect to emotion predictions. The emotion recognition models consist of a text-based model (T\u2192E), a pipeline that first predicts the appraisal and then classifies the emotion without access to text with a two-layer dense neural network (T\u2192A, A\u2192E). To measure the complementarity of these two settings, a third model is an oracle ensemble (T \u2192A \u2192E + T \u2192E) which accepts a prediction as true positive if one of the two models provides the correct prediction.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 147,
"end": 168,
"text": "Hofmann et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 1068,
"end": 1089,
"text": "Hofmann et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 1092,
"end": 1099,
"text": "Table 6",
"ref_id": "TABREF9"
},
{
"start": 1156,
"end": 1163,
"text": "Table 7",
"ref_id": "TABREF11"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Model Performance Notes and Comparison to Original Data Annotation",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "On this original data set by Hofmann et al. (2020) , our model constitutes a new state of the art. The micro-averaged appraisal prediction with RoBERTa is 10pp higher than the original CNNbased model; the emotion classification has similar improvements, and the overall relation between the model configurations remains comparable.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 29,
"end": 50,
"text": "Hofmann et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Model Performance Notes and Comparison to Original Data Annotation",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "To better understand how revealing emotions affects the annotations in Experiment 1, we provide some concrete examples. Table 8 reports instances from enISEAR. We show for which appraisal variables the agreement changes, by marking the appraisal with + or \u2212. For instance, \u2212attention means that the annotators came to disagree on that appraisal dimension when the emotion was uncovered, while +pleasantness indicates that they came to agree thanks to the knowledge of the emotion label. Note that + does not mean that the dimension was marked as 1 by both annotators. The examples are sorted by the sum of changes in agreement. In Example (1) an event is described in a way which leaves open if there is responsibility, pleasantness, anticipated effort, and even if the experiencer is entirely certain about what is happening. (Hofmann et al., 2020 ) and our RoBERTa model on the Text-to-Emotion baseline (T\u2192E), the pipeline experiment (T\u2192A,A\u2192E) and the oracle ensemble experiment (T \u2192A \u2192E + T \u2192E). These experiments follow the model configurations by Hofmann et al. (2020) . : Examples of differences between annotations with masked and visible emotion labels. + and \u2212 indicate the agreement and the disagreement on a specific dimension which is reached after making the emotion visible. The score is the sum of agreement changes, either improvements (+1 for each dimension) or degradation (\u22121). a: attention, ce: certainty, e: anticipated effort, p: pleasantness, r: responsibility, ci: circumstance.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 827,
"end": 848,
"text": "(Hofmann et al., 2020",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 1052,
"end": 1073,
"text": "Hofmann et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 120,
"end": 127,
"text": "Table 8",
"ref_id": "TABREF13"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative Analysis",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "With the knowledge that the emotion is fear, it becomes clear that the situation does involve anticipated effort, is not pleasant, and that circumstance is not likely. The annotators also agree here that there is responsibility involved, which is likely an interpretation based on world-knowledge.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative Analysis",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "In the situation of getting a new job (Example (2)), knowing the emotion adds agreement regarding certainty, which is in line with added agreement that the person was responsible. Example (3) is an instance in which the situation was already entirely clear without knowing the emotion -the experiencer participated in gossip. That is a certain, non-pleasurable situation (when recognizing this) which is under their own control. Knowledge that guilt has been experienced does not add anything.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative Analysis",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "Example (4) shows that complex situations cause more disagreement in annotations which are not necessarily resolved by knowing the emotion. The described event is about a negative emotion felt because the experiencer did not recognize the bad mood of the daughter. Annotators come to disagree about attention, certainty and responsibility. Example (5) describes another situation in which a negative event is discussed. Knowledge of the emotion puts a clear focus away from the sad part of the description (father dying) and puts it on something that causes anger. However, this shift does not resolve appraisal disagreements but indeed adds on top of them, with attention and anticipated effort.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative Analysis",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "Finally, Example (6) is another long description with annotators' focus on different aspects, one on the darkness (hence, no responsibility), the other on the cycling (responsibility). Here, knowledge of the emotion does not change the interpretability of the event. However, it informs on which part of the described situation the original author focused on.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative Analysis",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "These examples show that EMOVIS helps solve ambiguities when events can be associated to multiple emotions, other times it helps people give more weight to specific portions of texts. In the first case agreement tends to be reached more easily.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Qualitative Analysis",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "We analyzed how to build corpora of text annotated with appraisal variables and we evaluated how well such concepts can be modelled. By doing so, we brought together emotion analysis and a strand of emotion research in psychology which has received little attention from the computational linguistics community. We propose that in addition to wellestablished approaches to emotion analysis, like affect-oriented dimensional approaches or classification into predefined emotion inventories, psychological models of appraisals will be considered in future emotion-based studies, particularly those relying on event-oriented resources.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion & Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "The use of appraisals is interesting from a theoretical perspective: motivated by psychology, we leveraged the cognitive mechanisms underlying emotions, thus accounting for many complex patterns in which humans appraise an event and emotionally react to it. In this light, it is interesting in itself that our annotators were able to empathically reconstruct the event appraisals experienced by others, even without knowing their emotion.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion & Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "From a practical perspective, appraisal annotations are less prone to being poorly chosen for particular domains, in comparison to regular emotion classes, as the actual feeling develops based on the cognitive evaluation of an event. We also have shown that event descriptions alone might not be sufficient to properly annotate the hypothetical appraisal of the experiencer (which is, however, also an issue with traditional emotion analysis annotations and models -we cannot look into the feeler, we deal with private states). This shows and is presumably the reason that additional context (e.g., the emotion label) is required.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion & Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Some implications for future research and developments follow: ideally, appraisal (and emotion) annotations should stem directly from the experiencer. This is not doable in many NLP settings. For instance, when analyzing literature, it is impossible to ask fictional characters for their current event appraisal. However, we presume that settings on social media might be realistic, for instance by probing appropriate distant labeling methods, e.g., a careful choice of hashtags. If this is unfeasible, because text authors do not disclose their appraisals, the available emotion labels still represent a valuable source of information: as we have shown, they can guide the interpretation of the described events, and hence, the way in which these are post-assigned appraisal dimensions.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion & Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Finally, we provided evidence that even if a model is trained on automatically obtained appraisal labels, it is still capable of substantial performance. Therefore, we conclude that more corpora with appraisal dimensions from different languages and domains should be created from scratch. In the meantime, one can build on top of the rich set of available emotion corpora and automatically create appraisal-annotated resources out of them.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion & Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Annotations of enISEAR Table 9 shows the corpus statistics for the manually annotated corpora. In particular, it depicts how the availability of the emotion to the annotators influences the distribution of appraisal labels. The same numbers are also shown in a comparative manner in Figure 1 . For most appraisal dimensions, the annotations are more specific, narrower, across the counts for emotions and mostly manifest in a lower number of those. An exception is certainty, which shows higher counts for all emotions, and anticipated effort, which receives higher counts for shame, sadness, fear, and guilt, but not for anger. ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 23,
"end": 30,
"text": "Table 9",
"ref_id": "TABREF15"
},
{
"start": 283,
"end": 291,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A Corpus Statistics for Manual",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We acknowledge that model performance on an annotated corpus can only to some degree be used to assess data quality. However, in combination with our inter-annotator agreement assessments, it serves as an indicator of the amount of noise.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "These labels could be compared to humans' only on EMO-VIS, which turned out more reliable. We also consider EMO-HIDE because it represents standard emotion annotation procedures, where judges assess texts without further information.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [
{
"text": "This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (projects SEAT, KL 2869/1-1 and CEAT, KL 2869/1-2) and has partially been conducted within the Leibniz WissenschaftsCampus T\u00fcbingen \"Cognitive Interfaces\". We thank Kai Sassenberg and Laura Oberl\u00e4nder for inspiration and fruitful discussions.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Acknowledgements",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Identifying expressions of emotion in text",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Saima",
"middle": [],
"last": "Aman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Stan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Szpakowicz",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Text, Speech and Dialogue",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "196--205",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1007/978-3-540-74628-7_27"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Saima Aman and Stan Szpakowicz. 2007. Identify- ing expressions of emotion in text. In Text, Speech and Dialogue, pages 196-205, Berlin, Heidelberg. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "An analysis of annotated corpora for emotion classification in text",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Laura-Ana-Maria",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bostan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klinger",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2104--2119",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Laura-Ana-Maria Bostan and Roman Klinger. 2018. An analysis of annotated corpora for emotion clas- sification in text. In Proceedings of the 27th Inter- national Conference on Computational Linguistics, pages 2104-2119, Santa Fe, New Mexico, USA. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "EmoBank: Studying the impact of annotation perspective and representation format on dimensional emotion analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Sven",
"middle": [],
"last": "Buechel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Udo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hahn",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the European Chapter",
"volume": "2",
"issue": "",
"pages": "578--585",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sven Buechel and Udo Hahn. 2017. EmoBank: Study- ing the impact of annotation perspective and repre- sentation format on dimensional emotion analysis. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference of the Euro- pean Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Volume 2, Short Papers, pages 578-585, Valencia, Spain. Association for Computational Lin- guistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage",
"authors": [
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Walter",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cannon",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1929,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Walter B. Cannon. 1929. Bodily changes in pain, hunger, fear, and rage. Appleton-Century, New York, US.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Towards multimodal emotion recognition in german speech events in cars using transfer learning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Deniz",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cevher",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sebastian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zepf",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klinger",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Natural Language Processing (KONVENS 2019): Long Papers",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "79--90",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Deniz Cevher, Sebastian Zepf, and Roman Klinger. 2019. Towards multimodal emotion recognition in german speech events in cars using transfer learn- ing. In Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Nat- ural Language Processing (KONVENS 2019): Long Papers, pages 79-90, Erlangen, Germany. German Society for Computational Linguistics & Language Technology.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jacob",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cohen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1960,
"venue": "Educational and Psychological Measurement",
"volume": "20",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "37--46",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1177/001316446002000104"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jacob Cohen. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1):37-46.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Alexis",
"middle": [],
"last": "Conneau",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kartikay",
"middle": [],
"last": "Khandelwal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Naman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Goyal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Vishrav",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chaudhary",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Guillaume",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wenzek",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Francisco",
"middle": [],
"last": "Guzm\u00e1n",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Edouard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Grave",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Myle",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ott",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Luke",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zettlemoyer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Veselin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stoyanov",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "8440--8451",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.747"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Alexis Conneau, Kartikay Khandelwal, Naman Goyal, Vishrav Chaudhary, Guillaume Wenzek, Francisco Guzm\u00e1n, Edouard Grave, Myle Ott, Luke Zettle- moyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2020. Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning at scale. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics, pages 8440- 8451, Online. Association for Computational Lin- guistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "GoEmotions: A dataset of fine-grained emotions",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Dorottya",
"middle": [],
"last": "Demszky",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Movshovitz-Attias",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jeongwoo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ko",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Alan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cowen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gaurav",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nemade",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sujith",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ravi",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "4040--4054",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dorottya Demszky, Dana Movshovitz-Attias, Jeong- woo Ko, Alan Cowen, Gaurav Nemade, and Sujith Ravi. 2020. GoEmotions: A dataset of fine-grained emotions. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meet- ing of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 4040-4054, Online. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Exploring the validity of methods to track emotions behind the wheel",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Monique",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dittrich",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sebastian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zepf",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Persuasive Technology: Development of Persuasive and Behavior Change Support Systems",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "115--127",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1007/978-3-030-17287-9_10"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Monique Dittrich and Sebastian Zepf. 2019. Exploring the validity of methods to track emotions behind the wheel. In Persuasive Technology: Development of Persuasive and Behavior Change Support Systems, pages 115-127, Cham. Springer International Pub- lishing.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "An argument for basic emotions",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Paul",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ekman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1992,
"venue": "Cognition & emotion",
"volume": "6",
"issue": "3-4",
"pages": "169--200",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1080/02699939208411068"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Paul Ekman. 1992. An argument for basic emotions. Cognition & emotion, 6(3-4):169-200.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Solving the emotion paradox: categorization and the experience of emotion",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lisa Feldman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Barrett",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "Personality and Social Psychology Review",
"volume": "10",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "20--46",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2006. Solving the emotion paradox: categorization and the experience of emo- tion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1):20-46.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "How Emotions Are Made",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lisa Feldman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Barrett",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2017. How Emotions Are Made. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, New York, USA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "Reconstructing the past: A century of ideas about emotion in psychology",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Maria",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gendron",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lisa",
"middle": [
"Feldman"
],
"last": "Barrett",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Emotion review",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "316--339",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Maria Gendron and Lisa Feldman Barrett. 2009. Re- constructing the past: A century of ideas about emo- tion in psychology. Emotion review, 1(4):316-339.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "PO-EMO: Conceptualization, annotation, and modeling of aesthetic emotions in German and English poetry",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Thomas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Haider",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Steffen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Eger",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Evgeny",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kim",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klinger",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Winfried",
"middle": [],
"last": "Menninghaus",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "Proceedings of The 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1652--1663",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Thomas Haider, Steffen Eger, Evgeny Kim, Roman Klinger, and Winfried Menninghaus. 2020. PO- EMO: Conceptualization, annotation, and modeling of aesthetic emotions in German and English poetry. In Proceedings of The 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, pages 1652-1663, Mar- seille, France. European Language Resources Asso- ciation.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Emotion analysis: A survey",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Nida",
"middle": [],
"last": "Manzoor Hakak",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mohsin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mohd",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mahira",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kirmani",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mudasir",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mohd",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "2017 International Conference on Computer, Communications and Electronics (Comptelix)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "397--402",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1109/COMPTELIX.2017.8004002"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Nida Manzoor Hakak, Mohsin Mohd, Mahira Kirmani, and Mudasir Mohd. 2017. Emotion analysis: A survey. In 2017 International Conference on Com- puter, Communications and Electronics (Comptelix), pages 397-402.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Appraisal theories for emotion classification in text",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hofmann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Enrica",
"middle": [],
"last": "Troiano",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kai",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sassenberg",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klinger",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jan Hofmann, Enrica Troiano, Kai Sassenberg, and Ro- man Klinger. 2020. Appraisal theories for emotion classification in text.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "A survey on sentiment and emotion analysis for computational literary studies",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Evgeny",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kim",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klinger",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.17175/2019_008"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Evgeny Kim and Roman Klinger. 2019. A survey on sentiment and emotion analysis for computational literary studies. Zeitschrift fuer Digitale Geisteswis- senschaften, 4.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "RoBERTa: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Yinhan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Myle",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ott",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Naman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Goyal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jingfei",
"middle": [],
"last": "Du",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mandar",
"middle": [],
"last": "Joshi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Danqi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Omer",
"middle": [],
"last": "Levy",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mike",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lewis",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Luke",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zettlemoyer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Veselin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stoyanov",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Man- dar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. RoBERTa: A robustly optimized bert pretraining ap- proach. ArXiv, abs/1907.11692.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "2020. ktrain: A low-code library for augmented machine learning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Arun",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Maiya",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Arun S. Maiya. 2020. ktrain: A low-code library for augmented machine learning.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "What are aesthetic emotions?",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Winfried",
"middle": [],
"last": "Menninghaus",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Valentin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wagner",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Eugen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wassiliwizky",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ines",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schindler",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Julian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hanich",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Thomas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jacobsen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Stefan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Koelsch",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Psychological review",
"volume": "126",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/rev0000135"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Winfried Menninghaus, Valentin Wagner, Eugen Was- siliwizky, Ines Schindler, Julian Hanich, Thomas Ja- cobsen, and Stefan Koelsch. 2019. What are aes- thetic emotions? Psychological review, 126(2):171.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "#emotional tweets",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Saif",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mohammad",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "*SEM 2012: The First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "246--255",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Saif Mohammad. 2012. #emotional tweets. In *SEM 2012: The First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics -Volume 1: Proceedings of the main conference and the shared task, and Vol- ume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Work- shop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2012), pages 246-255, Montr\u00e9al, Canada. Association for Com- putational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "Obtaining reliable human ratings of valence, arousal, and dominance for",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Saif",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mohammad",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "20",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/P18-1017"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Saif Mohammad. 2018. Obtaining reliable human rat- ings of valence, arousal, and dominance for 20,000",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "English words",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "174--184",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/P18-1017"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "English words. In Proceedings of the 56th An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 174- 184, Melbourne, Australia. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "NRC-canada: Building the state-ofthe-art in sentiment analysis of tweets",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Saif",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mohammad",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Svetlana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kiritchenko",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Xiaodan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Seventh International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation",
"volume": "2",
"issue": "",
"pages": "321--327",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Saif Mohammad, Svetlana Kiritchenko, and Xiaodan Zhu. 2013. NRC-canada: Building the state-of- the-art in sentiment analysis of tweets. In Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Se- mantics (*SEM), Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sev- enth International Workshop on Semantic Evalua- tion (SemEval 2013), pages 321-327, Atlanta, Geor- gia, USA. Association for Computational Linguis- tics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Advocating a componential appraisal model to guide emotion recognition",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Marcello",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mortillaro",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ben",
"middle": [],
"last": "Meuleman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Klaus",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Scherer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "International Journal of Synthetic Emotions (IJSE)",
"volume": "3",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "18--32",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.4018/jse.2012010102"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Marcello Mortillaro, Ben Meuleman, and Klaus R. Scherer. 2012. Advocating a componential appraisal model to guide emotion recognition. International Journal of Synthetic Emotions (IJSE), 3(1):18-32.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC",
"authors": [
{
"first": "James",
"middle": [
"W"
],
"last": "Pennebaker",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Martha",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Francis",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roger",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Booth",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates",
"volume": "71",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "James W. Pennebaker, Martha E. Francis, and Roger J. Booth. 2001. Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC 2001. Mahway: Lawrence Erlbaum Asso- ciates, 71:2001.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "The nature of emotions",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Robert",
"middle": [],
"last": "Plutchik",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "American Scientist",
"volume": "89",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "344--350",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Robert Plutchik. 2001. The nature of emotions. Ameri- can Scientist, 89(4):344-350.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "Modelling valence and arousal in Facebook posts",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Daniel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Preo\u0163iuc-Pietro",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "H",
"middle": [
"Andrew"
],
"last": "Schwartz",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gregory",
"middle": [],
"last": "Park",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Johannes",
"middle": [],
"last": "Eichstaedt",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Margaret",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kern",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lyle",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ungar",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Elisabeth",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shulman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analysis",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "9--15",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/W16-0404"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Daniel Preo\u0163iuc-Pietro, H. Andrew Schwartz, Gregory Park, Johannes Eichstaedt, Margaret Kern, Lyle Un- gar, and Elisabeth Shulman. 2016. Modelling va- lence and arousal in Facebook posts. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Computational Approaches to Subjectivity, Sentiment and Social Media Analy- sis, pages 9-15, San Diego, California. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "Evidence for a three-factor theory of emotions",
"authors": [
{
"first": "James",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Russell",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Albert",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mehrabian",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1977,
"venue": "Journal of research in Personality",
"volume": "11",
"issue": "3",
"pages": "273--294",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-X"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "James A. Russell and Albert Mehrabian. 1977. Evi- dence for a three-factor theory of emotions. Journal of research in Personality, 11(3):273-294.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF29": {
"ref_id": "b29",
"title": "Psychological models of emotion",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klaus",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Scherer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2000,
"venue": "The neuropsychology of emotion., Series in affective science",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "137--162",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Klaus R. Scherer. 2000. Psychological models of emo- tion. In The neuropsychology of emotion., Series in affective science., pages 137-162. Oxford Univer- sity Press, New York, NY, US.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF30": {
"ref_id": "b30",
"title": "The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klaus",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Scherer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Cognition and emotion",
"volume": "23",
"issue": "7",
"pages": "1307--1351",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1080/02699930902928969"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Klaus R Scherer. 2009a. The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition and emotion, 23(7):1307-1351.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF31": {
"ref_id": "b31",
"title": "Emotions are emergent processes: they require a dynamic computational architecture",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Klaus",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Scherer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences",
"volume": "364",
"issue": "",
"pages": "3459--3474",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1098/rstb.2009.0141"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Klaus R. Scherer. 2009b. Emotions are emergent pro- cesses: they require a dynamic computational ar- chitecture. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 364(1535):3459-3474. Publisher: The Royal Soci- ety.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF32": {
"ref_id": "b32",
"title": "Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Klaus",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Scherer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Angela",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schorr",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tom",
"middle": [],
"last": "Johnstone",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Klaus R. Scherer, Angela Schorr, and Tom Johnstone. 2001. Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF33": {
"ref_id": "b33",
"title": "Evidence for universality and cultural variation of differential emotion response patterning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Klaus",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Scherer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Harald",
"middle": [
"G"
],
"last": "Wallbott",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1994,
"venue": "Journal of personality and social psychology",
"volume": "66",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.310"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Klaus R. Scherer and Harald G. Wallbott. 1994. Evi- dence for universality and cultural variation of differ- ential emotion response patterning. Journal of per- sonality and social psychology, 66(2):310.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF34": {
"ref_id": "b34",
"title": "Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new assessment tool",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ines",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schindler",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Georg",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hosoya",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Winfried",
"middle": [],
"last": "Menninghaus",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ursula",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beermann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Valentin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wagner",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [],
"last": "Eid",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Klaus",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Scherer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "PloS one",
"volume": "12",
"issue": "6",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1371/journal.pone.0178899"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ines Schindler, Georg Hosoya, Winfried Menninghaus, Ursula Beermann, Valentin Wagner, Michael Eid, and Klaus R. Scherer. 2017. Measuring aesthetic emotions: A review of the literature and a new as- sessment tool. PloS one, 12(6):e0178899.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF35": {
"ref_id": "b35",
"title": "Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Craig",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Smith",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Phoebe",
"middle": [
"C"
],
"last": "Ellsworth",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1985,
"venue": "Journal of Personality and Social Psychology",
"volume": "48",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "813--838",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1037/0022-3514.48.4.813"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Craig A. Smith and Phoebe C. Ellsworth. 1985. Pat- terns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4):813-838.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF36": {
"ref_id": "b36",
"title": "WordNet affect: an affective extension of Word-Net",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Carlo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Strapparava",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Alessandro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Valitutti",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'04)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Carlo Strapparava and Alessandro Valitutti. 2004. WordNet affect: an affective extension of Word- Net. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'04), Lisbon, Portugal. European Language Resources Association (ELRA).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF37": {
"ref_id": "b37",
"title": "Crowdsourcing and validating event-focused emotion corpora for German and English",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Enrica",
"middle": [],
"last": "Troiano",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sebastian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pad\u00f3",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klinger",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "4005--4011",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/P19-1391"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Enrica Troiano, Sebastian Pad\u00f3, and Roman Klinger. 2019. Crowdsourcing and validating event-focused emotion corpora for German and English. In Pro- ceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics, pages 4005- 4011, Florence, Italy. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF38": {
"ref_id": "b38",
"title": "Building Chinese affective resources in valence-arousal dimensions",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Liang-Chih",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lung-Hao",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Shuai",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yunchao",
"middle": [],
"last": "He",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jun",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [
"Robert"
],
"last": "Lai",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Xuejie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhang",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "540--545",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/N16-1066"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Liang-Chih Yu, Lung-Hao Lee, Shuai Hao, Jin Wang, Yunchao He, Jun Hu, K. Robert Lai, and Xuejie Zhang. 2016. Building Chinese affective resources in valence-arousal dimensions. In Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguis- tics: Human Language Technologies, pages 540- 545, San Diego, California. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"uris": null,
"text": "Frequency distribution of appraisals across emotions for EMOVIS (Visual) and EMOHIDE (Hidden).",
"num": null,
"type_str": "figure"
},
"TABREF0": {
"text": "felt . . . when my kitten was sick and I had to clean it up.",
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"3\">Emotion Appraisals Text</td></tr><tr><td>Joy</td><td>Attention,</td><td>I felt . . . when I knew that I was</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Certainty,</td><td>going back to Florida a year ear-</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Pleasant,</td><td>lier than I thought I would.</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Sit. Ctrl.</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Disgust</td><td>Attention,</td><td/></tr><tr><td/><td>Certainty,</td><td/></tr><tr><td/><td>Effort,</td><td/></tr><tr><td/><td>Sit. Ctrl.</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Fear</td><td>Attention,</td><td>I felt . . . when I was having a</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Effort,</td><td>hard attach.</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Sit. Ctrl.</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Guilt</td><td>Attention,</td><td>I felt . . . when I went on holiday</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Certainty,</td><td>and left our cat behind.</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Effort,</td><td/></tr><tr><td/><td>Respons.,</td><td/></tr><tr><td/><td>Control</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Sadness</td><td>Attention,</td><td>I felt . . . when I found out one</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Certainty,</td><td>of my favourite shops had shut</td></tr><tr><td/><td>Sit. Ctrl.</td><td>down.</td></tr></table>",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table"
},
"TABREF1": {
"text": "",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table"
},
"TABREF4": {
"text": "Experiment 1: Cohen's \u03ba between annotators on EMOVIS and EMOHIDE and modelling experiments. The model is separately trained and tested on EMOVIS and EMOHIDE.",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table"
},
"TABREF6": {
"text": "Experiment 2 Main Results: Cohen's \u03ba between annotators of EMOHIDE/EMOVIS and AUTOAPPR, on the subset of 210 instances from enISEAR. The classifier is trained on the full set of 1001 instances annotated automatically (AUTOAPPR) and evaluated on all other annotations (cross-validation splits remain the same).",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table"
},
"TABREF9": {
"text": "RoBERTA model performance on predicting appraisals on the original data by Hofmann et al.",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table"
},
"TABREF11": {
"text": "Comparison of the CNN",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table"
},
"TABREF13": {
"text": "",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table"
},
"TABREF15": {
"text": "Manual Annotation: Instance counts across emotions and appraisal annotations.",
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null,
"type_str": "table"
}
}
}
} |