File size: 72,953 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 |
{
"paper_id": "2021",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T07:12:16.265877Z"
},
"title": "Towards the ISO 24617-2-compliant Typology of Metacognitive Events",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Volha",
"middle": [],
"last": "Petukhova",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "Spoken Language Systems Group",
"institution": "Saarland Informatics Campus Saarland University",
"location": {
"settlement": "Saarbr\u00fccken",
"country": "Germany"
}
},
"email": "v.petukhova@lsv.uni-saaarland.de"
},
{
"first": "Hafiza",
"middle": [],
"last": "Erum Manzoor",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "Spoken Language Systems Group",
"institution": "Saarland Informatics Campus Saarland University",
"location": {
"settlement": "Saarbr\u00fccken",
"country": "Germany"
}
},
"email": ""
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "The paper presents ongoing efforts in design of a typology of metacognitive events observed in a multimodal dialogue. The typology will serve as a tool to identify relations between participants' dispositions, dialogue actions and metacognitive indicators. It will be used to support an assessment of metacognitive knowledge, experiences and strategies of dialogue participants. Based on the multidimensional dialogue model defined within the framework of Dynamic Interpretation Theory and ISO 24617-2 annotation standard, the proposed approach provides a systematic analysis of metacognitive events in terms of dialogue acts, i.e. concepts that dialogue research community is used to operate on in dialogue modelling and system design tasks.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "2021",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "The paper presents ongoing efforts in design of a typology of metacognitive events observed in a multimodal dialogue. The typology will serve as a tool to identify relations between participants' dispositions, dialogue actions and metacognitive indicators. It will be used to support an assessment of metacognitive knowledge, experiences and strategies of dialogue participants. Based on the multidimensional dialogue model defined within the framework of Dynamic Interpretation Theory and ISO 24617-2 annotation standard, the proposed approach provides a systematic analysis of metacognitive events in terms of dialogue acts, i.e. concepts that dialogue research community is used to operate on in dialogue modelling and system design tasks.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Daily life is replete with determinations about the reliability of our own thoughts and feelings as well as attributions about the thoughts and feelings of others. These metacognitive capacities underlie cognitive and social adaptation, influence decisionmaking, can enhance self-efficacy. Metacognition enables cognitive control needed for people to anticipate the future task demands, improves learning and performance on complex memory tasks, knowledge transfer and task switching (Taatgen, 2013) . Cognitive models of metacognitive processes, when integrated into human-computer dialogue, transform the dialogue system from a reactive dialogue participant into a proactive learner, accomplished multi-tasking planner and adaptive decision maker (Malchanau et al., 2018) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 484,
"end": 499,
"text": "(Taatgen, 2013)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF29"
},
{
"start": 749,
"end": 773,
"text": "(Malchanau et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF22"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Metacognitive capabilities of existing interactive systems, even of complex smart learning environments (Spector, 2014) , are still rather limited so as metacognitive strategies used. To exploit the full potential of efficient metacognitive support in a dialogue system, big multimodal data samples are required to reliably identify metacognitive states accounting for a complexity of multidimensional contingencies between tasks, performed actions and participants' cognitive and emotional dispositions. An elaborate computational model of (meta)cognitive states calls, in the first place, for a typology of metacognitive events -reflexive activities that express the sender's mindful awareness of own and others cognitive processes, e.g. checking out and verification of attention, recognition, understanding, evaluation and regulation of content, thought processes, attitudes, preferences, assumptions and emotions. Metacognitive events should be computable/learned from a range of low level multi-sensory and psycho-physiological indicators (markers). Methods are required to transform multimodal data in a meaningful way to enable appropriate measurements of metacognition, adaptive decision-making and efficient coordination of multiple dialogue tasks. The main goal of the presented study is to provide a theoretical framework, methodological insights and experimental design to model relevant metacognitive processes, and specify a set of recognizable and measurable indicators to assess metacognition in dialogue.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 104,
"end": 119,
"text": "(Spector, 2014)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF28"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "The paper is structured as follows. Section 2 reviews methods to assess metacognition in interactive setting. In Section 3, we specify the model of metacognitive processes within the framework of Dynamic Interpretation Theory (DIT). We adapt the established metacognition assessment instruments in order to discover potential correlations between dialogue acts and metacognitive events. Section 4 presents experimental design featuring data collection, processing and ISO 24617-2 compliant annotation protocols. We wrap up the paper by outlining expected project outcomes.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Assessment of metacognition traditionally involves self-reported measurements. The most widely used Metacognition Questionnaire (MCQ, Cartwright-Hatton and Wells (1997)) evaluates fac-tors related to positive and negative metacognitive beliefs, metacognitive monitoring and judgements of cognitive confidence. Questionnaires are however of limited value since they are subjective and not always accurate (Schraw, 2009) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 404,
"end": 418,
"text": "(Schraw, 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF27"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Metacognition Assessment Instruments",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "There are two online methods proposed to assess metacognition: thinking aloud and reflection when prompting. Participants speak about their own cognitive states or processes and their understanding of partner's states and processes, or are prompted to reflect on the reasons why they chose specific actions -verbalized metacognition. The methods enable assessment of three elements of metacognition -experiences (e.g. confidence, confusion), knowledge (e.g. gaps), and strategies (e.g. actions). Think-aloud and prompting protocols provide rich information about the metacognitive processes when performing a task and are powerful predictors of test performance (Bannert and Mengelkamp, 2008) . Verbalization methods are proven valid, but time consuming. Moreover, elicitation of explicit monitoring, reflection and regulation moments may disrupt or even break down the interaction process, distort its naturalness, trigger attention theft, increase cognitive load and impact negatively participants' engagement.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 662,
"end": 692,
"text": "(Bannert and Mengelkamp, 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Metacognition Assessment Instruments",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "There is research performed on the psychophysiological measurement of metacognition. Physiological measures make use of EEG electroencephalography (Wokke et al., 2020), heart rate (Meessen et al., 2018) , and pupil dilation (Lempert et al., 2015) , but require rather complex and often expensive hard-and software set ups. Other methods exploit information about interlocutor's behaviour via log files and efficiently combine it with questionnaire data (Linek et al., 2008) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 180,
"end": 202,
"text": "(Meessen et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 224,
"end": 246,
"text": "(Lempert et al., 2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
},
{
"start": 453,
"end": 473,
"text": "(Linek et al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Metacognition Assessment Instruments",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Recently, increasing computational power and technological advances opened up new data-driven assessment scenarios. A huge diversity of inexpensive tracking and sensing devices enable rather exhaustive real-time monitoring and immediate assessment of affective cognitive states, including metacognitive aspects (Ga\u0161evi\u0107 et al., 2015) . Significant progress has been booked in automatic affective cognitive state recognition from speech and visual signals (Kapoor and Picard, 2005; DMello et al., 2008) . Large amounts of multimodal data is used to train deep learning algorithms to recognize facial expressions related to emotions and cognitive states in large variety of scenarios.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 311,
"end": 333,
"text": "(Ga\u0161evi\u0107 et al., 2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
},
{
"start": 455,
"end": 480,
"text": "(Kapoor and Picard, 2005;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF19"
},
{
"start": 481,
"end": 501,
"text": "DMello et al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Metacognition Assessment Instruments",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "The definition and detection of metacognitive multimodal indicators requires transforming the raw multi-sensory data collected in a meaningful way so that it allows taking decisions, provide indicators of interlocutor's performance, efficiency and preferences (Greene and Azevedo, 2010). This has been done for interaction logs, the records of sequential actions users performed in an interface. Such actions are interpreted as any communicative action, i.e. having certain communicative functions. A set of dialogue acts has been proposed for screen events by translating the human-human communication mechanisms into human-computer interactions as functions of GUI (van Dam, 2006) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 663,
"end": 682,
"text": "GUI (van Dam, 2006)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Metacognition Assessment Instruments",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Coherence and interaction analysis is applied to analyse think-aloud interviews and prompting interaction transcripts (Ericsson and Simon, 1984) ; modern natural language processing techniques are used (Bosch et al., 2021) . In multimodal interactions that involve speech, taking notes, nonverbal communication and graphical user interface actions, metacognitive strategies are observable via interaction logs, metacognitive experiences -via recorded and tracked behaviour, and metacognitive knowledge -via speech and typed transcripts. The interaction-based approach to measure metacognition that we propose will enable real-time and non-intrusive assessment of all metacognitive aspects -experiences, knowledge and strategies.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 118,
"end": 144,
"text": "(Ericsson and Simon, 1984)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
},
{
"start": 202,
"end": 222,
"text": "(Bosch et al., 2021)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Metacognition Assessment Instruments",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Metacognitive regulation refers to adjustments individuals make to their processes to help control their task performance, learning and interaction. Metacognitive processes underlie awareness, monitoring, reflection and regulation activities (Brown, 1987) . Metacognition has implicit and explicit forms, 1 and is applied to own (sender's) and others (addressee's) cognitive processes. In human dialogue, metacognitive processes concern reasoning about interlocutors' intentions and knowledge, and are often modelled as parts of shared or mutual beliefs forming a common ground (Traum, 1994; Bunt, 2000) . (3) A believes that it is mutually believed that p To classify and model implicit and explicit metacognitive events (acts), the framework of the Dynamic Interpretation Theory (DIT, Bunt (1999) ) and the ISO 24617-2 dialogue act annotation standard (ISO, 2012) will be used. DIT has emerged from the study of multimodal human-human dialogues uncovering fundamental principles observed in such interactions. DIT and its subset ISO 24617-2 are open multidimensional dialogue act taxonomies 3 . They are proven to provide theoretically grounded and empirically tested inventory of dialogue acts with fine-grained semantic distinctions presenting the semantic framework for the systematic analysis and computational modelling of multimodal dialogue behaviour in many interactive settings. Special attention will be paid to feedback acts which we assume are crucial for successful recognition of metacognitive events: positive and negative feedback about speaker's own (auto-feedback) and the partner's processing (allo-feedback) at the five processing levels: attention, perception, interpretation, evaluation and execution (Bunt, 2000) . Speaker's repairs, (self-)corrections, partner completions and hesitations (silent and filled pauses) are assumed to strongly correlate with moments of reflection and may reveal speaker's cognitive confidence. Managing allocation of time, turn, struc- turing discourse and control over issues under discussion concern with planning aspects. Analysing socio-emotional aspects will enable modelling of metacognitive activities related to positive, negative thoughts, feelings of uncontrollability and danger, and engagement related emotions such as boredom, enjoyment and frustration. Table 1 provides a preliminary view on associations/correlations between metacognitive activities, MCQ dimensions and DIT/ISO dialogue acts illustrated with multimodal behaviour examples. The typology will be experimentally tested and extended as described in the next Section.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 242,
"end": 255,
"text": "(Brown, 1987)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
},
{
"start": 578,
"end": 591,
"text": "(Traum, 1994;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 592,
"end": 603,
"text": "Bunt, 2000)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
},
{
"start": 787,
"end": 798,
"text": "Bunt (1999)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 1725,
"end": 1737,
"text": "(Bunt, 2000)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 2323,
"end": 2330,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Modelling Metacognitive Processes in Dialogue Interaction",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Use case The importance of metacognition has been empirically proven for negotiations (Galluccio and Safran, 2015). High self-and others-monitors are more concerned that their negotiations go well, flexibly modify their actions to better adapt to the changing dynamics of the situation, typically by using other people's behaviour as a guide to their own. High self-monitors and -assessors are more likely to engage in argumentation and are better able to accomplish their goals. As the use case, we will focus on patientphysician negotiations for shared decisions. Medi-cal students and professionals tend to overestimate the value of medical knowledge and are known as poor self-monitors and self-assessors (Eichbaum, 2014) . Therapy planning scenarios of varied complexity will be defined reflecting different participant's dispositions. Interaction concerns multiissue bargaining where each issue involves multiple negotiation options with preferences representing parties negotiation positions. Preferences are weighted in order of importance (strength) and defined as the participant's beliefs about attitudes towards certain behaviour and abilities to perform this behaviour. The goal of each partner is to find out preferences of each other and to search for the best possible mutual agreement. The human participant -doctor -negotiates either with a human or artificial patient who will have different preferences and instructed (programmed) to apply several negotiation and decision-making strategies (Petukhova et al., 2019) . 4 Data Collection will be performed via a) human-human role-playing (small-scaled) and b) human-agent interactive simulations (large collections). Role-playing method is often used to collect interactive data in a controlled setting and underpins simulations of many real-life communicative situations (Br\u00f4ne and Oben, 2015) . Here, one participant will be randomly assigned the role of a doctor, the other participant -a patient. Each participant will receive instructions and preference profile, and asked to negotiate a mutual agreement with the highest possible value. Procedures will be specified for the settings where both participants: (1) observe others' actions and flag problems or gaps;",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 709,
"end": 725,
"text": "(Eichbaum, 2014)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 1511,
"end": 1535,
"text": "(Petukhova et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
},
{
"start": 1538,
"end": 1539,
"text": "4",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1840,
"end": 1862,
"text": "(Br\u00f4ne and Oben, 2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experimental Design",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "(2) verbalise their cognitive processes and their understanding of partner's states and processes; (3) explain his/her choices; and (4) are involved in free flow negotiation. The former three settings will be used as reference for the analysis of metacognition in the unconstrained close to authentic interactions.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experimental Design",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "Simulations of communicative situations with human and artificial Simulated Patients (SPs) will be arranged. Regular medical communication practice often takes place in a patient-simulated setting, where Simulated Patients (SPs) are involved to portray a particular set of symptoms or roles (Kaplonyi et al., 2017) . Simulations with humans provide high fidelity training, but are costly, difficult to reproduce and access. AI agents as SPs can be used to create specific situations in which physicians metacognitive processes can be activated and assessed (Petukhova et al., 2019) . Moreover, simulations will impose certain restrictions in order to investigate a controlled set of communicative (metacognitive) activities and related phenomena without having to deal with unrelated details. Multimodal data will be recorded. The quality of recordings will be adapted to the application conditions, i.e. a fairly good but not perfect acoustic and visual quality will be targeted. Prior to recordings, participants will complete the short MCQ-30 questionnaire. We will account for gender and role differences.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 291,
"end": 314,
"text": "(Kaplonyi et al., 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF18"
},
{
"start": 557,
"end": 581,
"text": "(Petukhova et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experimental Design",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "Data Recording and Processing Participants' speech will be transcribed by running the Kaldibased 5 Automatic Speech Recognizer re-trained on the medical in-domain data and correcting the output manually. Since substantial deviations in patient and physician vocabularies are assumed, language models will be adapted to both groups. OpenSMILE tool 6 will be used to extract spectral, prosodic and voice quality features. OpenFace tool 7 will be used to extract 2D/3D facial landmark 5 https://kaldi-asr.org/ 6 https://www.audeering.com/opensmile/ 7 https://github.com/TadasBaltrusaitis/ points for eyes, eyebrows, nose, mouth, jawline and head, and to compute 18 Facial Action Units (AUs). OpenFace enables real-time online/off-line feature extraction from a webcam input and videos, thus no expensive sensors and tracking devices are required. To record GUI interactions, a graphical utility Atbswp in Python3 will be used to record the mouse and keyboard actions.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experimental Design",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "Multi-sensory data will be synchronised and stored in the standard tei format, and exported to ELAN 8 to perform the ISO 24617-2 compliant annotations.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experimental Design",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "The proposed project will contribute to a better understanding of metacognitive processes underlying dialogue participants decision-making and interactive performance progressing towards a computational cognitive model of social metacognition. An interaction-based method for metacognition assessment will be worked out providing an ISOcompliant typology of metacognitive events, a set of multimodal feature extraction and classification models as well as new tools for multidimensional dialogue analysis. Finally, substantial amount of multimodal data annotated with the ISO 24617-2 dialogue acts will be provided to the research community via DialogBank release. 9",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Expected Outcomes",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "Explicit metacognition is considered a uniquely human ability(Frith, 2012).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Adapted from(Bunt et al., 2007).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "DIT, Release 5.2 and ISO 24617-2, Second Edition are available on https://dit.uvt.nl/",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The list of multimodal indicators is not complete, for more examples see(Petukhova, 2005).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Assessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruction to think aloud and reflect when prompted. does the verbalisation method affect learning?",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Maria",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bannert",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christoph",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mengelkamp",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Metacognition and Learning",
"volume": "3",
"issue": "",
"pages": "39--58",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Maria Bannert and Christoph Mengelkamp. 2008. As- sessment of metacognitive skills by means of instruc- tion to think aloud and reflect when prompted. does the verbalisation method affect learning? Metacog- nition and Learning, 3(1):39-58.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Students verbalized metacognition during computerized learning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Nigel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bosch",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yingbin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhangm",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Luc",
"middle": [],
"last": "Paquette",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ryan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Baker",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jaclyn",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ocumpaugh",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gautam",
"middle": [],
"last": "Biswas",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "ACM SIGCHI: Computer-Human Interaction",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Nigel Bosch, Yingbin Zhangm, Luc Paquette, Ryan Baker, Jaclyn Ocumpaugh, and Gautam Biswas. 2021. Students verbalized metacognition during computerized learning. In ACM SIGCHI: Computer- Human Interaction.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Insight interaction: a multimodal and multifocal dialogue corpus. Language resources and evaluation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Geert",
"middle": [],
"last": "Br\u00f4ne",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Bert",
"middle": [],
"last": "Oben",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "",
"volume": "49",
"issue": "",
"pages": "195--214",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Geert Br\u00f4ne and Bert Oben. 2015. Insight interaction: a multimodal and multifocal dialogue corpus. Lan- guage resources and evaluation, 49(1):195-214.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. Metacognition, motivation, and understanding",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ann",
"middle": [],
"last": "Brown",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1987,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ann Brown. 1987. Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mecha- nisms. Metacognition, motivation, and understand- ing.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Dynamic interpretation and dialogue theory. The structure of multimodal dialogue",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Harry",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bunt",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1999,
"venue": "",
"volume": "2",
"issue": "",
"pages": "139--166",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Harry Bunt. 1999. Dynamic interpretation and dia- logue theory. The structure of multimodal dialogue, 2:139-166.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Dialogue pragmatics and context specification. Abduction, Belief and Context in Dialogue",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Harry",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bunt",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2000,
"venue": "Studies in Computational Pragmatics. Amsterdam: Benjamins",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "81--150",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Harry Bunt. 2000. Dialogue pragmatics and context specification. Abduction, Belief and Context in Di- alogue. Studies in Computational Pragmatics. Ams- terdam: Benjamins, pages 81-150.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "An empirically based computational model of grounding in dialogue",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Harry",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bunt",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roser",
"middle": [],
"last": "Morante",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Simon",
"middle": [],
"last": "Keizer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "283--290",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Harry Bunt, Roser Morante, and Simon Keizer. 2007. An empirically based computational model of grounding in dialogue. In Proceedings of the 8th SIGdial Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, pages 283-290.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Beliefs about worry and intrusions: The metacognitions questionnaire and its correlates",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Sam",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cartwright-Hatton",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Adrian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wells",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1997,
"venue": "Journal of anxiety disorders",
"volume": "11",
"issue": "3",
"pages": "279--296",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sam Cartwright-Hatton and Adrian Wells. 1997. Be- liefs about worry and intrusions: The meta- cognitions questionnaire and its correlates. Journal of anxiety disorders, 11(3):279-296.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Dialogue acts in GUIs",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hans Van Dam",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hans van Dam. 2006. Dialogue acts in GUIs. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, Depart- ment of Industrial Design.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Autotutor detects and responds to learners affective and cognitive states",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Sidney",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dmello",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tanner",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jackson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Scotty",
"middle": [],
"last": "Craig",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Brent",
"middle": [],
"last": "Morgan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chipman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Holly",
"middle": [],
"last": "White",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Natalie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Person",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Barry",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kort",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Rosalind",
"middle": [],
"last": "El Kaliouby",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Picard",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Workshop on emotional and cognitive issues at the international conference on intelligent tutoring systems",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "306--308",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sidney DMello, Tanner Jackson, Scotty Craig, Brent Morgan, P Chipman, Holly White, Natalie Person, Barry Kort, R El Kaliouby, Rosalind Picard, et al. 2008. Autotutor detects and responds to learners af- fective and cognitive states. In Workshop on emo- tional and cognitive issues at the international con- ference on intelligent tutoring systems, pages 306- 308.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Thinking about thinking and emotion: the metacognitive approach to the medical humanities that integrates the humanities with the basic and clinical sciences",
"authors": [
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Quentin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Eichbaum",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "The Permanente Journal",
"volume": "18",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Quentin G Eichbaum. 2014. Thinking about think- ing and emotion: the metacognitive approach to the medical humanities that integrates the humanities with the basic and clinical sciences. The Permanente Journal, 18(4):64.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Anders",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ericsson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Herbert A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Simon",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1984,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "K Anders Ericsson and Herbert A Simon. 1984. Proto- col analysis: Verbal reports as data. the MIT Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "The role of metacognition in human social interactions",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chris",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Frith",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences",
"volume": "367",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2213--2223",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Chris D Frith. 2012. The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Philosophical Transac- tions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1599):2213-2223.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Mindfulness-based training for negotiators: Fostering resilience in the face of stress",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Mauro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Galluccio",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jeremy",
"middle": [
"D"
],
"last": "Safran",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "Handbook of International Negotiation",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "209--226",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Mauro Galluccio and Jeremy D Safran. 2015. Mindfulness-based training for negotiators: Foster- ing resilience in the face of stress. In Handbook of International Negotiation, pages 209-226. Springer.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Lets not forget: Learning analytics are about learning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Dragan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ga\u0161evi\u0107",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Shane",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dawson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "George",
"middle": [],
"last": "Siemens",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "",
"volume": "59",
"issue": "",
"pages": "64--71",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dragan Ga\u0161evi\u0107, Shane Dawson, and George Siemens. 2015. Lets not forget: Learning analytics are about learning. TechTrends, 59(1):64-71.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "The measurement of learners self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computerbased learning environments",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jeffrey",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roger",
"middle": [],
"last": "Greene",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Azevedo",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Educational psychologist",
"volume": "45",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "203--209",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jeffrey A Greene and Roger Azevedo. 2010. The measurement of learners self-regulated cognitive and metacognitive processes while using computer- based learning environments. Educational psychol- ogist, 45(4):203-209.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Language resource management -Semantic annotation framework -Part 2: Dialogue acts. ISO 24617-2. ISO Central Secretariat",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Iso",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "ISO. 2012. Language resource management -Seman- tic annotation framework -Part 2: Dialogue acts. ISO 24617-2. ISO Central Secretariat, Geneva.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Understanding the impact of simulated patients on health care learners communication skills: a systematic review",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jessica",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kaplonyi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kelly-Ann",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bowles",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Debra",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nestel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Debra",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kiegaldie",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Stephen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Maloney",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Terry",
"middle": [],
"last": "Haines",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Cylie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Williams",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Medical education",
"volume": "51",
"issue": "12",
"pages": "1209--1219",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jessica Kaplonyi, Kelly-Ann Bowles, Debra Nestel, Debra Kiegaldie, Stephen Maloney, Terry Haines, and Cylie Williams. 2017. Understanding the im- pact of simulated patients on health care learners communication skills: a systematic review. Medical education, 51(12):1209-1219.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "Multimodal affect recognition in learning environments",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ashish",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kapoor",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Rosalind",
"middle": [
"W"
],
"last": "Picard",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM international conference on Multimedia",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "677--682",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ashish Kapoor and Rosalind W Picard. 2005. Multi- modal affect recognition in learning environments. In Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM interna- tional conference on Multimedia, pages 677-682.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "Relating pupil dilation and metacognitive confidence during auditory decision-making",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Karolina",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yu",
"middle": [
"Lin"
],
"last": "Lempert",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Stephen M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fleming",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "PLoS One",
"volume": "10",
"issue": "5",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Karolina M Lempert, Yu Lin Chen, and Stephen M Fleming. 2015. Relating pupil dilation and metacog- nitive confidence during auditory decision-making. PLoS One, 10(5):e0126588.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "The differential use and effective combination of questionnaires and logfiles",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Birgit",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stephanie B Linek",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dietrich",
"middle": [],
"last": "Marte",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Albert",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Computerbased Knowledge & Skill Assessment and Feedback in Learning settings (CAF), Proceedings of the International Conference on Interactive Computer Aided Learning (ICL)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Stephanie B Linek, Birgit Marte, and Dietrich Albert. 2008. The differential use and effective combina- tion of questionnaires and logfiles. In Computer- based Knowledge & Skill Assessment and Feedback in Learning settings (CAF), Proceedings of the Inter- national Conference on Interactive Computer Aided Learning (ICL), 24th to 26th September.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "Towards integration of cognitive models in dialogue management: designing the virtual negotiation coach application",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Andrei",
"middle": [],
"last": "Malchanau",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Volha",
"middle": [],
"last": "Petukhova",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Harry",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bunt",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Dialogue & Discourse",
"volume": "9",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "35--79",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Andrei Malchanau, Volha Petukhova, and Harry Bunt. 2018. Towards integration of cognitive models in dialogue management: designing the virtual nego- tiation coach application. Dialogue & Discourse, 9(2):35-79.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "Learning by heartthe relationship between resting vagal tone and metacognitive judgments: a pilot study",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Judith",
"middle": [],
"last": "Meessen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Stefan",
"middle": [],
"last": "S\u00fctterlin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Siegfried",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gauggel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Thomas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Forkmann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Cognitive processing",
"volume": "19",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "557--561",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Judith Meessen, Stefan S\u00fctterlin, Siegfried Gauggel, and Thomas Forkmann. 2018. Learning by heartthe relationship between resting vagal tone and metacog- nitive judgments: a pilot study. Cognitive process- ing, 19(4):557-561.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Multidimensional interaction of multimodal dialogue acts in meetings",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Volha Petukhova",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Volha Petukhova. 2005. Multidimensional interaction of multimodal dialogue acts in meetings. Ph.D. the- sis, MA thesis, Tilburg University.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "Modelling shared decision making in medical negotiations: Interactive training with cognitive agents",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Volha",
"middle": [],
"last": "Petukhova",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Firuza",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sharifullaeva",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dietrich",
"middle": [],
"last": "Klakow",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "International Conference on Principles and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "251--270",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Volha Petukhova, Firuza Sharifullaeva, and Dietrich Klakow. 2019. Modelling shared decision making in medical negotiations: Interactive training with cog- nitive agents. In International Conference on Prin- ciples and Practice of Multi-Agent Systems, pages 251-270. Springer.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind?",
"authors": [
{
"first": "David",
"middle": [],
"last": "Premack",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Guy",
"middle": [],
"last": "Woodruff",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1978,
"venue": "Behavioral and Brain sciences",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "04",
"pages": "515--526",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "David Premack and Guy Woodruff. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain sciences, 1(04):515-526.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacognition and learning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Gregory",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schraw",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "",
"volume": "4",
"issue": "",
"pages": "33--45",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Gregory Schraw. 2009. A conceptual analysis of five measures of metacognitive monitoring. Metacogni- tion and learning, 4(1):33-45.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jonathan",
"middle": [
"Michael"
],
"last": "Spector",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "Smart learning environments",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "1--10",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jonathan Michael Spector. 2014. Conceptualizing the emerging field of smart learning environments. Smart learning environments, 1(1):1-10.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF29": {
"ref_id": "b29",
"title": "The nature and transfer of cognitive skills",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Niels A Taatgen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "Psychological review",
"volume": "120",
"issue": "3",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Niels A Taatgen. 2013. The nature and transfer of cog- nitive skills. Psychological review, 120(3):439.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF30": {
"ref_id": "b30",
"title": "A computational theory of grounding in natural language conversation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "David R Traum",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1994,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "David R Traum. 1994. A computational theory of grounding in natural language conversation. Tech- nical report, Rochester Univ NY Dept of Computer Science.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF31": {
"ref_id": "b31",
"title": "Action information contributes to metacognitive decision-making",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Dalila",
"middle": [],
"last": "Martijn E Wokke",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Axel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Achoui",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cleeremans",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "Scientific reports",
"volume": "10",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "1--15",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Martijn E Wokke, Dalila Achoui, and Axel Cleeremans. 2020. Action information contributes to metacogni- tive decision-making. Scientific reports, 10(1):1-15.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"TABREF0": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>In face-to-face conversation, participants</td><td/></tr><tr><td>may present evidence of grounding through ver-</td><td/></tr><tr><td>bal and vocal signals, body movements and facial</td><td/></tr><tr><td>expressions; in interaction with graphical user in-</td><td>du4 provides evidence for that; upon understanding</td></tr><tr><td>terfaces, typing behaviour, mouse movements and</td><td>du4, A has accumulated the following beliefs:</td></tr><tr><td>clicks may signal changes in (meta)cognitive and motivational functioning. A metacognitive event is</td><td>(2) A believes that p A believes that B believes that p</td></tr><tr><td>characterised through evidence of reflexive activi-ties indicating any level of sender's mindful aware-</td><td>A believes that B believes that A believes that p A believes that B believes that A believes that B believes that p</td></tr><tr><td>ness about own (sender's) and others (partner's)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>cognitive process(-es):</td><td/></tr><tr><td>At all these levels, positive and negative beliefs</td><td/></tr><tr><td>concern sender's awareness about: (i) his/her</td><td/></tr><tr><td>own thoughts (zero-order theory of mind abili-</td><td/></tr><tr><td>ties, Premack and Woodruff (1978)), (ii) about an-</td><td/></tr><tr><td>other person's thoughts (first-order theory of mind),</td><td/></tr><tr><td>and (iii) what another person thinks about sender's</td><td/></tr><tr><td>thoughts (second-order theory of mind). Consider</td><td/></tr><tr><td>the following example 2 :</td><td/></tr><tr><td>(1) du1. A: The next train is at 11:02.</td><td/></tr><tr><td>du2. B: At 11:02.</td><td/></tr><tr><td>du3. A: That's correct.</td><td/></tr><tr><td>du4. B: Okay thanks</td><td/></tr></table>",
"text": "Common ground is not directly accessible. An access to self and others cognitive processes through questionnaires and think-aloud protocols is very limited; reports on own and others' intentions can be inaccurate. (Meta)cognitive processes underlying establishing and updating common ground (grounding), on the other hand, may become accessible through or inferred from observable dialogue behaviour. For instance, gaze (re-)direction deliver information about the interlocutor attention by means of frequency and duration of gaze fixation on the Areas of Interest (AoI), but also provides an evidence about the positive versus negative emotional reaction on the fixated object. Level 4: evaluate content and feeling, inspect/compare past experiences and verify hypotheses ('I am as worried as you are...'); \u2022 Level 5: regulate and align, correct/adjust, imitate, anticipate consequences, plan the ongoing procedure (content, sequences, timing,...). is verifying its recognition or even on a higher level -its understanding. So after du2, A believes that B believes that p, and that B believes that A believes that p. However, A cannot be certain that B indeed believes that p, since in du2 he also seems to offer that belief for confirmation. A's response du3 gives that confirmation. At this point A does not yet know whether his utterance has reached B and was well understood. B's next contribution",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"num": null
},
"TABREF2": {
"content": "<table/>",
"text": "Tentative mapping between metacognitive actions, associated MCQ dimensions and DIT/ISO24617-2 dialogue acts illustrated with examples of possible multimodal metacognitive indicators.4",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"num": null
}
}
}
} |