File size: 118,974 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 |
{
"paper_id": "2020",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T07:12:13.041272Z"
},
"title": "Interoperable Semantic Annotation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lars",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Norwegian University of Science and Technology",
"location": {
"country": "Norway"
}
},
"email": "lars.hellan@ntnu.no"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "The paper presents an annotation schema with the following characteristics: it is formally compact; it systematically and compositionally expands into fullfledged analytic representations, exploiting simple algorithms of typed feature structures; its representation of various dimensions of semantic content is systematically integrated with morpho-syntactic and lexical representation; it is integrated with a \"deep\" parsing grammar. Its compactness allows for efficient handling of large amounts of structures and data, and it is interoperable in covering multiple aspects of grammar and meaning. The code and its analytic expansions represent a crosslinguistically wide range of phenomena of languages and language structures. This paper presents its syntactic-semantic interoperability first from a theoretical point of view and then as applied in linguistic description.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "2020",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "The paper presents an annotation schema with the following characteristics: it is formally compact; it systematically and compositionally expands into fullfledged analytic representations, exploiting simple algorithms of typed feature structures; its representation of various dimensions of semantic content is systematically integrated with morpho-syntactic and lexical representation; it is integrated with a \"deep\" parsing grammar. Its compactness allows for efficient handling of large amounts of structures and data, and it is interoperable in covering multiple aspects of grammar and meaning. The code and its analytic expansions represent a crosslinguistically wide range of phenomena of languages and language structures. This paper presents its syntactic-semantic interoperability first from a theoretical point of view and then as applied in linguistic description.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Semantic annotation can cover, amongst others, semantic argument structure; situation structure; quantifier scope; perspective of wording (transparent vs. oblique); anaphora; turns in discourse and types of moves or states within larger texts. Semantic annotation necessarily applies to linguistic expressions or texts, and the assigned content is often dependent on grammatical or lexical analysis, calling for grammatically/lexically interoperable annotation designs. This means that a natural format for semantic annotation is one where it interacts with grammatical or lexical representation more generally. In most areas the degree of complexity of the semantic representation, combined with the complexity of lexical or grammatical specification of the phenomena to which it is applied, is so high that it is reasonable to use a system of compact semantic tagging. We here present a system of integrated morpho-syntactic and semantic tagging applicable to large constructs such as verb valence lexicons and corpora tagged for valence. The tagging system we present is an extension of the system Construction Labeling (CL) described and applied in Dakubu 2010 and . In this extended system, the CL code is mapped to a a Typed Feature Structure (TFS) formalism sustaining computational \"deep\" parsers assigning both morphosyntactic and semantic analysis to the sentences parsed. The formalism of the system comes close to the HPSG formalism, 2 but with important exceptions (see below), and alternatives can be explored relative to other frameworks as well, such as, in all likelihood, LFG. 3 The first part of the paper is devoted to the overall formal architecture of the system, in particular presenting its semantic components both inside of the TFS system and in the tagging formalism (sections 2-4). In the second part 3 On LFG (\"Lexical Functional Grammar\"), see Bresnan (2001) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 1153,
"end": 1168,
"text": "Dakubu 2010 and",
"ref_id": "BIBREF19"
},
{
"start": 1595,
"end": 1596,
"text": "3",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1829,
"end": 1830,
"text": "3",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1874,
"end": 1888,
"text": "Bresnan (2001)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction 1",
"sec_num": "1."
},
{
"text": "(section 5) we describe how the overall tagging formalism can be employed in semantic specification in large resources such as valence lexicons and valence corpora, first addressing a valence lexicon and corpus for the West African language Ga (Kwa, spoken in Ghana), and then valence resources for Norwegian. In the third part (section 6) we mention possible extensions of the system from the argument structure domain to quantifier scope and other scopal phenomena.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction 1",
"sec_num": "1."
},
{
"text": "The Construction Labelling (CL) code provides construction-level annotation tags which in one-line strings provide much of the information that could otherwise be expressed in multi-tier syntactic and semantic annotation. The strings are subject to semi-automatic consistency control, and can also be applied in valence specification in lexicons and in grammatical parsing. It has the added capacity of serving as types in a TFS system, enabling the consistency control and the parsing functionality. Following the overall left-to-right order indicated in (1), CL valency annotations are written as illustrated in (2):",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "(1) head -valenceFramespecial properties of syntactic constituentssemantic roles of constituentsaspect, Aktionsartsituation type",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "(2) v-tr-suAg_obAffincrem-ACCOMPL [Ex. John ate the cake]",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "The string in (2) reads: \"a verb-headed transitive syntactic frame where the subject carries an agent role and the object an incrementally affected role, and the situation type expressed is \"accomplishment\".",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "The example (3) from Citumbuka (Bantu) instantiates verbal derivation underlying the expression of causation, illustrating interplay between morpho-syntax and semantics:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "(3) Mary wa-ka-mu-phik-isk-a John nchunga",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "Mary 1SM-Pst-1OM-cook-Caus-FV John beans N V N N vCaus-dbobCs",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "'Mary made John cook beans'",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "The CL-string vCaus means that the head is a verb and has a causative morpheme, and dbobCs means that the construction is a double object construction \"derived\" through causativization. The derivation can be further indicated through specifications of the arguments of the derived verb, in terms of their derivational histories, thus extending the formula vCaus-dbobCs to",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "(4) vCaus-dbobCs-suC-obCsu-ob2Cob",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "where the added items read as follows: suC -subject is created by Causativization obCsu -object is derived ('demoted') from subject by Causativization",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation related to semantic argument structure of verbal constructions",
"sec_num": "2."
},
{
"text": "Expanding from what was said above (cf. (1)), each CL tag is a string consisting of, first, a label specifying POS of head of the construction and salient morphological marking (like vCaus in (3)), second, a label designating the overall structure of a construction (encoding notions like intransitive, transitive, ditransitive/double object, etc. (such as dbobCs in (3)), third a string of labels classifying features of the arguments such as the added tags abovefirst syntactic features and then semantic features -, and finally a string of labels for TAM features and situational content. Whenever a putative CL string is composed, the labels of the string have to match with each otherfor instance, if one label is intr, for \"intransitive\", then there cannot be an argument label prefixed by ob, since intr is not defined for such a label. A processing mechanism enforcing such consistency is provided using a unification-based TFS system, in which the CL tag labels are defined as types. This TFS system is at the same time what underlies the automatic interoperability. Information in such a system is generally exposed through Attribute Value Matrices (AVMs), where each AVM belongs to a type, and attributes are introduced (declared) according to the following conventions:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "(5) [A] A given type introduces the same attribute(s) no matter in which environment it is used.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "[B] A given attribute is declared by one type only (but occurs with all of its subtypes).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Among the types in the present system are types for grammatical functions represented as values of the attribute \"GF\" (which constitutes an addition to the standard array of formal notions in HPSG) 4 , and roles in semantic argument structure represented as values of the 4 For discussion and motivation for the emplyment of GF notions in an HPSG-based formalism, see Hellan (2019a) and Hellan (2020).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 368,
"end": 382,
"text": "Hellan (2019a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "attribute \"ACTNT\" (see further in section 4 for types for situation structure). The type gramfct has subtypes declaring GF attributes such as \"SUBJ\" and \"OBJ\" (cf. (6a)), and the type actnt has subtypes declaring semantic participant attributes, such as \"ACT1\" and \"ACT2\" (cf. (6b)):",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "(6) a. gramfct b. actnt / \\ / \\ su-gf ob-gf act1-rel act2-rel [SUBJ sign] [OBJ sign] [ACT1index] [ACT2 index] \\ / \\ / su-ob-gf act12-rel",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "With such features as basis, one can represent, e.g., (3) as in 7, which is an AVM representing a construction. This involves a specification of grammatical functions and actants acting together, identified through the attributes GF and ACTNT, introduced at the level of constructions through a declaration \"cp := top & [GF gramfct, ACTNT actnt]\", where the type label cp stands for \"construction profile\". It has dbobCs as one of its subtypes, comprising the notion of causation through the PRED value \"cause\" inside the ACTNT specification; the attribute \"D-BASE\" stands for \"derivational base\" (or \"input\"):",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "AVM for double object construction with causative semantics and causative derivation (cf. (3)):",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We then outline how, in their capacity as types in the TFS grammar, CL labels define AVMs at the formal level of constructions. As subtypes of cp, definitions sustaining the type tr (\"transitive\") are shown in the following, achieved through a join of two cp subtypes, one defined with regard to GF, the other with regard to ACTNT:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "(8) cp : : cpSuOb cpAct12 [GF su-ob-gf] [ACTNT act12-rel] \\ / \\ / SUBJ INDX 1 GF OBJ INDX 2 OBJ2 INDX 3 PRED ' ' ACT1 1 ACTNT PRED ' ' ACT2 6 ACT1 2 ACT2 3 SUBJ INDX 2 GF D-BASE OBJ INDX 3 cause dbobCs cook sign \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb ACTNT 6 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb SUBJ INDX 1 GF OBJ INDX 2 ACT1 1 ACTNT 12 ACT2 2 su ob gf tr act rel \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf02d \uf02d \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf02d \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "tr is thus formally defined as a type of construction. Similar depths of specification are required for all CL labels. When CL labels occur in a string, they unify. To illustrate with some types relevant also for English, the types to which the labels in (2) correspond are indicated in (9) , and their unification is (10):",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 287,
"end": 290,
"text": "(9)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF32"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "EQUATION",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 8,
"text": "EQUATION",
"ref_id": "EQREF",
"raw_str": "(9) v ---[HEAD verb] tr ---(cf. (8)) suAg --- obAffincrem ---GF OBJ INDX 1 SIT AFFECTED 1 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb ACCOMPL ---[SIT accomplishment]",
"eq_num": "(10)"
}
],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "HEAD SUBJ INDX 1 GF OBJ INDX 2 ACT1 1 ACTNT ACT2 2 ACTOR 1 SIT AFFECTED 2 verb accomplishment \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The semantic roles corresponding to the labels suAg and obAffincrem are represented in a space of semantics called Situation Structure (\"SIT\") through the attributes ACTOR and AFFECTED, both relevant within the situation type accomplishment; cf. section 4 below. Returning to the label in (4), the AVMs for the \"derivational histories\" will be as in (11), the unification with the structure for dbobCs is the structure in (7). c.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Here each type represents the part of the whole AVM corresponding to the content of the (derived) subject, object, and second object (\"ob2\"). Unification presupposing feature compatibility, being the formal point illustrated here, the control of consistency in the CL string (4) is thereby inbuilt in the formalism. We have at the same time introduced two aspects of semantic analysis represented by the attributes ACTNT and SIT, to which we turn further below. First we consider semantic relations carried by structures internal to NPs.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "ob2Cob -second object is derived from object by Causativization",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The sentence in (12) is a construction from Ga: 5",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "(12) Mi-yitso mii-gba mi 1S.POSS-head PROG-split 1S N V PN \"My head is aching.\" (literally: \"my head aches me\")",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "Here we want to represent the subject as a possessive phrase, where the referent of the whole phrase is a (body)part of the specifier \"mi\", and this specifier is also identical to the object; in terms of semantics, the situation as a whole has the label \"EXPERIENCE\", the role of the subject is that of \"locus\" of the experience, and the \"experiencer\" is expressed by the object. In terms of the CL formalism this can be stated as follows:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "(13) v-tr-suPossp_suBPsuSpec_suSpecIDob-suLocus_obExp- EXPERIENCE",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "The part suBPsuSpec is a type representable as 14, where \"is-bodypart-of-rel\" spells out \"BP\", and the part suSpecIDob is spelled out as (15), where identical indices reflect the part \"ID\":",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "(14) (15)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "Unification of (14) and (15) yields (16), adding the eventual contribution from the meaning specification of",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "5 From Dakubu (Unpublished a). GF SUBJ INDX 1 SIT ACTOR 1 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb GF SUBJ INDX 1 PRED ' ' ACTNT ACT1 1 sign suC cause \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb GF OBJ INDX 2 PRED ' ' ACTNT ACT2 6 ACT1 2 GF SUBJ INDX 2 D-BASE ACTNT 6 cause obCsu sign \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb GF OBJ2 INDX 3 PRED ' ' ACTNT ACT2 6 ACT2 3 2 GF OBJ INDX 3 D-BASE ACTNT 6 cause ob Cob sign \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb INDX 1 GF SPEC INDX 2 GF SUBJ PRED 'is-bodypart-of'-rel ACTNT ACT1 1 ACT2 2 suBPsuSpec \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb SUBJ GF SPEC INDX 2 GF OBJ INDX 2 suSpecIDob \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "the verb, and the semantic CL specifications, where 'locus' has a meaning close to 'stimulus' but in addition indicates the location of the 'stimulus':",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "(16)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "We now comment on \"Situation structure\" as a semantic concept, and compare it with the attribute \"ACTNT\"..",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation for semantic relations of nominal constructions",
"sec_num": "3."
},
{
"text": "A more detailed SIT-representation of a verb like run is given in 17. Here run is a situation type. ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "\uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf02d \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf02d \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf02d \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0ea \uf0ea \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0fa \uf0fa \uf0fa",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "Types like these sit in an ontology of situational content as outlined in Hellan (2019a, b) , where each label corresponds to a node in a situation type hierarchy. Figure 1 illustrates part of such a hierarchy (also obeying the conventions in (5)). This hierarchy hosts both general situation types and types sorting under the notions \"Aspect\" or \"Aktionsart\", as developed in, e.g., Vendler 1967 , Smith 1991 ,1997 , Verkuyl 1996 , and many others. Attributes declared by its types can have either \"+/-\" as their value, or types defined within another hierarchy, instantiated by runningparticipant in (17), whose attributes represent aspects of the behavior of a participant filling the outer attribute in question (such as \"MOVER\" in (17)). Run, together with walk, count as subtypes of the type actorLocomotion, which, in joins with general types for reaching endpoints or going by via-points, also dominates situation types for \"running to\" a certain point or \"running via\" a certain point, as indicated in the figure. \"run-to-the -house\" \"run-through-the-door\" As an inheritance hierarchy, an attribute introduced for a given type will belong to all of its subtypes. Top types often introduce attributes with a value still unspecified, such as aktionsart, but once a value is set, that value holds for all the subtypes. In this way, for instance, the type actorLocomotion has the full structure (18), with the inherited values.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 74,
"end": 91,
"text": "Hellan (2019a, b)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 385,
"end": 397,
"text": "Vendler 1967",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 398,
"end": 410,
"text": ", Smith 1991",
"ref_id": "BIBREF29"
},
{
"start": 411,
"end": 416,
"text": ",1997",
"ref_id": "BIBREF29"
},
{
"start": 417,
"end": 431,
"text": ", Verkuyl 1996",
"ref_id": "BIBREF31"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 164,
"end": 173,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "ACTOR 1",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "MOVER 1 END DYN + COMPL + actorLocomotionEndpt \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "A CL label can in principle relate to any node at any \"height\" in such a hierarchy. For instance, the type actorLocomotion in Figure 1 corresponds to the CL label MOTIONDIRECTED, and its subtype actorLocomotionEndpt corresponds to MOTIONtoENDPT; thus, the Situation Structure assigned to a sentence like They run to the town will be (18), and a CL representation for the construction as such will be (19). 19v-intr-suDir-suEndpt-MOTIONtoENDPT Labels such as suAg and obExp also refer into the SIT hierarchy, then into situation types sharing the attribute in question. Thus, when for instance suMover and",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 126,
"end": 134,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "\uf05b \uf05d INDX 1 GF SPEC INDX 2 SUBJ GF PRED 'is-bodypart-of'-rel ACTNT ACT1 1 ACT2 2 OBJ INDX 2 PRED 'gba'-rel ACTNT ACT1 1 ACT2 2 SIT exp \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb LOCUS 1 EXPERIENCER 2 erience \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0e9 \uf0f9 \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0ea \uf0fa \uf0eb \uf0fb \uf0eb \uf0fb",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "MOTIONDIRECTED occur in the same CL string, then the attribute MOVER is declared by a type also dominating actorLocomotion.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "The expressiveness of this format of representation may be compared with formats of representation in Lexical Semantics using predicate-argument style notation, for instance considering the notation for lexical semantics developed in Jackendoff 1990, called \"Lexical Conceptual Structure' (LCS) , (see also Dorr 1993). Here a sentence like John ran into the room will have the representation (20), where the predicate \"GO\" represents dynamic directional movement:",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 234,
"end": 294,
"text": "Jackendoff 1990, called \"Lexical Conceptual Structure' (LCS)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "(20) [GO ([JOHN] THING , [TO ([IN ([ROOM] THING )] PLACE )] PATH )] EVENT",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "Relative to this LCS formula, the type actorLocomotion corresponds to \"GO\", and reachEndpoint corresponds to the predicate \"TO\". The dominance by dynamic corresponds to the bracket label \"EVENT\", and orientedSit corresponds to \"PATH\". What in LCS corresponds to ACTOR in (18) is not stated in (20) but at an extra tier of representation displaying force relations, a bit like the function of effort in Figure 1 . The formats thus seem to allow for comparison in a possibly tractable manner, and possibly with the conclusion that the information which can be displayed in them is essentially the same (both can in principle also be enriched to display more fine-grained information).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 402,
"end": 410,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "While the information of SIT thus in principle unfold the universe of what can be represented within approaches such as Lexical Semantics or Conceptual Semantics, the attributes defined within the attribute ACTNT are extremely few, and reflect only an enumeration of the arguments which are grammatically manifest in the sentence in question, and their numbering (as ACT1, ACT2, etc., up to maybe ACT4) only reflects an ordering between them particular to that sentence or predicate, based vaguely on a dimension of agentivity or \"proto-role\", and respecting a conception of stages in a derivation. Thus, although the sentence in (3) has three syntactic arguments, the ACT-roles are just ACT1-ACT2 relative to the causepredicate, and ACT1-ACT2 relative to the cook-predicate, as displayed in (7), in both cases such that what would be a subject in a closest paraphrase is ACT1. In the case of a passive construction, the role ACT1 will belong to the \"highest-ranking\" item in the conceivable active form, which is again to say the subject in this active structure, so that the subject in the passive version may represent ACT2 or ACT3 as a role. This is a design familiar in formal grammars, corresponding to what is called \"Semantic Argument Structure\" in Grimshaw (1992) and related work, to argument structure as common in Predicate Logic, and with a semi-shallow robustness which makes it suitable for \"Deep\" computational grammars such as those based on HPSG, where the level of logical representation called \"Minimal Recursion Semantics\" (MRS; cf. Copestake et al. 2005) displays sentential semantic content in this form. The CL code does not directly display ACTNT structure, but given the GF specifications of all items, and the formal tractability of derivational structure as illustrated in (4)-(7)-(11) for the Bantu derivational form, the ACTNT roles of any derived sentence structure are tractable, and in plain non-derived structures the subject is the ACT1, the direct object the ACT2, and an indirect object the ACT3. For oblique objects one can use ACT4, ACT5, etc., or ACTobl. Although superficially similar to the system using ARG1, ARG2, etc in PropBank, 6 the ACTNT system differs from that of PropBank in that none of the attributes ACT1, ACT2, etc represents a specific semantic value -ARG1 in PropBank, in contrast, is agent. In this way, semantic richness is represented in the SIT system, whereas the kind of semantics that very closely follows grammatical structure is represented in the ACTNT system.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 1257,
"end": 1272,
"text": "Grimshaw (1992)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1554,
"end": 1576,
"text": "Copestake et al. 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "Having now introduced the annotation system Construction Labeling, the components of the TFS to which it can be mapped, and in particular the semantic components, what we call the grammatical interoperability of the CL notation has been demonstrated. We now turn to uses and applications of the system.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation Structure",
"sec_num": "4."
},
{
"text": "The CL annotation code is used in three types of applicationscorpora, lexicons, and computational grammars, and in addition in the compilation of language valence profiles, which in a compact format represent the construction types and valence types available in a language. 7 We now describe the role of the semantic labels relative to such systems, first a construction and valence inventory of Ga, and then of Norwegian.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 275,
"end": 276,
"text": "7",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Semantic annotation in valence lexicons and valence corpora",
"sec_num": "5."
},
{
"text": "A valence resource for Ga was developed by Prof. Mary Esther Kropp Dakubu as an extension of the Toolbox lexicon underlying her Ga-English Dictionary Dakubu (2009) . In this extension, valence specification using the CL code was added systematically, resulting in about 2000 entries such that each entry of a verb represents one valence frame. Each such entry is illustrated by a fully annotated sentence, which means that the lexicon is at the same time a valence corpus of about 2000 short sentences.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 150,
"end": 163,
"text": "Dakubu (2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF8"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation types in a Ga construction and valence inventory",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "An edited version of this resource is found at Ga Valence Profile in the downloadable text file Ga_verb_dictionary_for_digital_processing\", cited as Dakubu (unpublished a), to which we refer in the following; a larger extension is available in Dakubu (unpublished b). Ga makes little use of prepositions and adjectives, so that constructions involving nouns and verbs may be seen as playing a relatively large role, the latter for instance through multiverb expressions subsuming Serial Verb Constructions (SVCs), Extended Verb Complexes (EVCs) which are sequences of preverbs preceding a main verb, heading a clause by itself or partaking in an SVC), and Verbid Constructions (ViD), where verb phrases play a role of adverbials. 8 The use of complex pre-nominal specifiers within noun phrases is another predominant feature, briefly summarized in terms of number of entries exhibiting them in Table 1 below, and exemplified in (12). The array of Situation Types used was conceived in parallel with the process of annotation of the data, 9 rather than being built on any pre-existing inventory. The frame types used in FrameNet 10 were consulted but found to be too English-biased for the purpose. As a result the situation types are at a somewhat general level, but also not very abstractrelative to types like those in Figure 1 they occupy the lower half, but not as far down as matching lexically-specific meanings; they thus may be said to classify construction type meanings rather than verb meanings. Table 2 renders the most frequently used type labels, ordered alphabetically and with indication of the number of entries exhibiting them: With the set of 2000 entries classified by CL strings, one can investigate the frequency of frames used, the correspondence between syntactic and semantic structure, the clustering of certain valence types for sets of verbs (constituting \"Verb Classes\", see below), and more. To exemplify, the layout of information illustrated in (21) indicates the entry ID, the full CL construction specification, and the gloss of the verb heading the construction. The ID links to a parallel display where the instantiating sentence is given. The entries exemplified all have the situation type MOTIONDIRECTED:",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 1038,
"end": 1039,
"text": "9",
"ref_id": "BIBREF32"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 894,
"end": 901,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 1321,
"end": 1329,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF1"
},
{
"start": 1507,
"end": 1514,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF3"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation types in a Ga construction and valence inventory",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "fa_212 := v-tr-obNomvL-suAg_obLoc-INCHOATION-MOTIONDIRECTED (appx. gloss: \"start up\")",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation types in a Ga construction and valence inventory",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "fo_338 := v-tr-obPostp-suAg_obPath-REFLEXIVE-MOTIONDIRECTED (appx. gloss: \"turn around\") ke_737 := sv_suAspID-suAg-v2tr-v2pv1Pro-v2obLoc-MOTIONDIRECTED (appx. gloss: \"proceed\") k\u0254_757 := v-intr-suAg-MOTIONDIRECTED (appx. gloss: \"climb\") kpeleke_841 := v-tr-obPostp_obSpecThAbst-suAg_obTh-MOTIONDIRECTED (appx. gloss: \"land\")",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation types in a Ga construction and valence inventory",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "The glosses of the 55 entries with this situation type involve the following items as gloss of the head verb, listed by number of occurrence:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation types in a Ga construction and valence inventory",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "\"go\" -12, \"come\" -7, \"push away\" -6, \"arrive at\" -3, \"land\" -3, \"go before\" -3, \"start\" -2, \"run\" -2, \"visit\" -2, \"forget/leave\" -2, \"push\" -2, \"climb\" -2, \"repent/turn away from\" -2, \"travel\" -1, \"turn around\" -1, \"proceed\" -1, \"depart\" -1, \"strike\" -1, \"paddle\" -1, \"trail\" -1",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation types in a Ga construction and valence inventory",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "For one thing, this illustrates that Situation Types and lexical meanings are distinct. For investigations into verb classes, such numbers, paired with the grammatical structures of the constructions involved, provide a good starting point. As for the grammatical structures involved in the 55 entries, most total strings are unique, only one applies to 5 entries, one to 3 entries, and three to 2 entries. However, the CL code allows one to compare also with regard to substrings, which allows for a flexible methodology of establishing correspondences in these domains.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation types in a Ga construction and valence inventory",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "The literature on Valency Classes (aka Verb Classes) starts with Levin 1993, which is an attempt to find correlations between verb meanings and the arrays of valency frames available for given verbs. 11 Levin\"s approach has been pursued for English during VerbNet at a large scale, 12 which is a resource featuring more than 6000 verbs divided into nearly 300 verb classes. In the The Leipzig",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Situation types in a Ga construction and valence inventory",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "For instance, for the \"spray-load\"-alternation verbs in English, as exemplified in spray paint on the wall vs spray the wall with paint, a characterizing feature is the expression of two incremental dimensions at the same time (here the amount of paint and the area of wall covered), whereby either one or the other can be expressed by an NP inducing completeness of that dimension, reflected in the alternating frames (the \"noncompleted\" dimension represented by the PP). 12 http://verbs.colorado.edu/~mpalmer/projects/verbnet.html).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Valency Classes project (Malchukov and Comrie 2015) and the accompanying valency database ValPaL 13 the arrays of frames for 80 verb meanings are compared across 30 languages; here one uses English verbs as \"names\" of verb meaningsfor instance, the \"kill verb\" is treated as a constant entity \"KILL\" across the languages. This gives, for each of the 80 verbs, a view of the frames that the verb can take across these languages.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The current enterprise is mostly in the spirit of VerbNet, since we are dealing with a large number of verbs. Apart from size differences, what is particular to the present approach is the way in which it allows the annotation code to serve as a key instrument of representation. In the VerbNet verb entry illustrated in Figure 2 below, the syntactic specification consists of a dependency tree (not shown here) and a line combining POS and semantic role in an order matching the linear order in which the relevant constituents occur. In our approach, a syntactic format linked to the linear order of the constituents in the analyzed string is given in the example sentences, while the ordering within the CL string is independent of linear order in the examples. The CL syntactic code nevertheless comes close to representing a dependency analysis (and a full-fledged syntactic and semantic parse can in principle be called upon 14 ). The display under SEMANTICS has a richness of content comparable to our Situation Structure, but closer in style to the predicate-argument structure exemplified in (20) than to the AVM format used here. The design used in VerbNet has counterparts in most other valence-related applications, 15 so on a comparative note, we may say that the present analytic apparatus offers counterparts to all of the representations found in the standard applications. What the CL notation provides in addition is a compact one-line view of all of the relevant factors brought together, and an algorithm by which this compact notation is linked to the analytically full representations.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 321,
"end": 329,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": "FIGREF3"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "A further comparative aspect lies in the use of hierarchical",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "13 http://valpal.info/ 14 Through a parser, cf. Hellan (2020).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "15 Among existing valence dictionaries are for instance:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "English:FrameNet; VerbNet; PropBank; German: Evalbu; Chech: Vallex; Polish: Walenty; respective urls: https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal, http://verbs.colorado.edu/~mpalmer/projects/verbnet.html, https://ufal.mff.cuni.cz/czengvallex, http://hypermedia2.idsmannheim.de/evalbu/, http://ucnk.ff.cuni.cz, http://clip.ipipan.waw.pl/Walenty.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "organization: FrameNet to a mild extent uses this for frames, i.e., situation structures, but not with the efficiency of TFS as illustrated in Figure 1 . In return, though, a full system comprising all of the situation type labels in Table 2 (or the totality of the 140 types used) has not yet been constructed. VerbNet uses organization of entries like that for spray-9.7 in Figure 2 such that a common meaning \"dominates\" those structures that share that meaning. Such an organization can readily be provided also in the present notation. For instance, the array of entries for ba \"come\" includes the following,",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 143,
"end": 151,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF1"
},
{
"start": 234,
"end": 282,
"text": "Table 2 (or the totality of the 140 types used)",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 377,
"end": 385,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": "FIGREF3"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "<ba_1, v-intr-suAg-MOTIONDIRECTED> <ba_2, evSuAg-vintr-pv1obTh-MOTIONDIRECTED> <ba_3, v-tr-obPostp-suAg_obLoc-MOTIONDIRECTED> <ba_6, v-tr-suAg_obEndpt-MOTIONDIRECTED> <ba_8, v-ditr-suAg_obTh_ob2Endpt-MOTIONDIRECTED>",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "which could be displayed as follows, keeping in mind that all labels unify, and hence a hierarchy (or ontology) can in principle be designed with any label as top node:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "MOTIONDIRECTED v-intr-suAg v-ditr-suAg_obTh_ob2Endpt evSuAg-vintr-pv1obTh v-tr-suAg_obEndpt v-tr-obPostp-suAg_obLoc",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Figure 3 Hierarchical organization of entries for ba \"come\" with MOTIONDIRECTED as common meaning",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "11",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "A cluster of resources for Norwegian has been created where the CL code plays a pivotal role in (i) encoding the lexical types of verbs as represented in the HPSG-type computational grammar Norsource 16 , (ii) constituting the valence specifications in a valence lexicon of about 13,000 valence entries, organized using the tags as lexical types coextensive with the verbal part of the grammar lexicon, 17 and (iii) serving as valence tags in a verb valence corpus generated by the grammar. 18 In the latter, valence and construction tags are thus assigned to verbs in 22,000 sentences, illustrated in Figure 4 below: here valence annotation labels supplement a standard IGT annotation, 19 with the CL notation accompanied by two other formats of valence labelling, \"SAS\" for \"syntactic argument structure\"",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 491,
"end": 493,
"text": "18",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 687,
"end": 689,
"text": "19",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 602,
"end": 610,
"text": "Figure 4",
"ref_id": "FIGREF4"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "CL code in a verb valence lexicon and a valence corpus for Norwegian",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "16 NorSource (cf. Hellan and Bruland 2015) has been maintained since 2001. Code files are downloadable from GitHub: https://github.com/Regdili-NTNU/NorSource/tree/master. 17 The valence lexicon, called NorVal, is under development, cf. Quasthoff et al. (2020) . An earlier version can be seen at http://regdili.hf.ntnu.no:8081/multilanguage_valence_demo/multi valence, called MultiVal, described in Hellan et al. (2014) , where four lexicons based on computational HPSG grammars for Norwegian, Ga, Spanish, Bulgarian are brought together using the same types of valence frame labels. 18 Cf. Hellan et al. (2017, forthcoming) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 171,
"end": 173,
"text": "17",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 236,
"end": 259,
"text": "Quasthoff et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF28"
},
{
"start": 399,
"end": 419,
"text": "Hellan et al. (2014)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
},
{
"start": 584,
"end": 586,
"text": "18",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 591,
"end": 624,
"text": "Hellan et al. (2017, forthcoming)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "CL code in a verb valence lexicon and a valence corpus for Norwegian",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "19 Using the glossing system and interface of TypeCraft (https://typecraft.org/; cf. Beermann and Mihaylov (2014)).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "CL code in a verb valence lexicon and a valence corpus for Norwegian",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "and \"FCT\" for \"functional label\"; the valence frames of both the main verb (vite (\"know\")) and the subordinate verb (forbause (\"surprise\")) are specified:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "CL code in a verb valence lexicon and a valence corpus for Norwegian",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "String: Jeg vet at hun forbauset Ola To the CL expressions, which here lack role and Situation Type labels, one could easily add such labels, but in the current state their absence reflects the cirumstance that most of the valence specifications in the underlying grammar, which uses CL code, do not have such specifications. Among reasons why this is so is that the introduction of semantic features in a large scale grammar is not only time consuming in linguistic respects but also requires the balancing of combinatorial complexities arising with the introduction of new dimensions of specification. Within limited domains like that of location and direction it has however been done, through the specification of lexical items and combinatory rules of the relevant kinds. Here a large part of the specifications are tied to prepositions and adverbs, so that for instance in the lexical specifications operative for the sentence De l\u00f8per til byen (\"they run to the town\"), l\u00f8pe is encoded as intransitive directional and til is encoded as an end-point preposition. The resulting parse will in Situation Type terms have the label MOTIONtoENDPOINT, while the verb by itself belongs to the type MOTIONDIRECTED.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "CL code in a verb valence lexicon and a valence corpus for Norwegian",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "To the extent that a display like that in Figure 4 is generated through a grammar, thus, it cannot represent the verb as such as being of the type MOTIONtoENDPOINT. This illustrates a further factor by which a grammargenerated corpus can fail to be as specific as a \"handmade\" corpus. Still, the CL formalism being one where semantic specifications can be seamlessly added to the grammatical ones, it leaves room for incrementally adding such specifications in the corpus. Figure 5 illustrates this interplay between verb and preposition. In the NorSource parse tree to the left one sees the critical specifications of the items l\u00f8pe and til, and in the MRS to the right the specification \"Role: endpoint\" is induced through the semantic specifications of the preposition and the verb together: The MRS construction is based on what corresponds to the ACTNT component described in section 4 (but here with \"ARG\" rather than \"ACT\"), thus a fairly shallow level of semantic description, however with the possibility of specifying the ARG/ACT for semantic roles, which is done in the grammar, although at an earlier point. 20",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 42,
"end": 50,
"text": "Figure 4",
"ref_id": "FIGREF4"
},
{
"start": 473,
"end": 481,
"text": "Figure 5",
"ref_id": "FIGREF5"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "CL code in a verb valence lexicon and a valence corpus for Norwegian",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "Here we consider a possible extension of the CL style of specification to phenomena standardly analyzed in terms of scope. First addressing quantifier scope, 21 we may build on the CL designs used for NP internal structures, illustrated in section 3. In a sentence like (23), one commonly recognizes two scoping possibilities, for which the CL-style strings in (24) provide a labeling, with QS understood as \"quantifier out-scoping\"; (a) represents two men as having wide scope, with suQSob read as \"subject outscoping object\", and (b) represents every book as having wide scope: A notation like this may be useful for corpus annotation with the goal of finding patterns as to when multiple scopings are possible. Given that syntactic subjects can probably by default be counted as outscoping everything that they c-command, the (a) versions of (24) and (26) may count as redundant. The link into the AVM formalism can follow the design of the feature structure input to MRS representations in HPSG grammars, as outlined in Copestake et al. 2005 . Although quantifier scoping is per se perhaps a strictly semantic matter, the participants in scoping relations are generally syntactically identifiable, 22 which makes the general design of the present notation possible. Among phenomena manifest in a wider domain of configurations is \"reported speech\", as studied (a) in their role in determining morpho-syntactic patterns across languages, for instance in phenomena like subjunctive mood and logophoricity, 23 and (b) in their role in various kinds of apparent analytic paradoxes in formal representation. A common denominator of many instances of both types is the choice of whose construal is reflected in the piece of text concerned: either the construal of the wording as that of the speaker, or the construal of the wording as that of one of the participants, mostly the subject. A typical example from the (b) domain is (27),",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 1024,
"end": 1045,
"text": "Copestake et al. 2005",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Labeling for scope",
"sec_num": "6."
},
{
"text": "John thinks that the statue is taller than it is.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Labeling for scope",
"sec_num": "6."
},
{
"text": "where the wording taller than it is is most reasonably attributed to the speaker, not to John. Exploring the annotation format used above, speaker construal relative to a text piece \"\u2026\" can conceivably be annotated as \"spkCS\u2026\", with spk for \"speaker\", and subject construal as \"suCS\u2026\", with su as before, and CS in both cases understood as construal scope. The fruitfulness of the format may depend in part on how easily what is indicated by \"\u2026\" can be identified for given constructions. As exemplified in (13) above, the notation allows for the specification of paths \"down\" into constituents, and in principle, as long as a text piece coincides with what can be syntactically motivated as a constituent, a path can be defined; (28) illustrates the point for speaker construal relative to the example in (27), for a path specification into the object clause\"s predicate (marked as sc, for \"secondary predicate\").",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Labeling for scope",
"sec_num": "6."
},
{
"text": "(28) spkCSobDECLsc (This reads as: \"speaker has construal-scope over the secondary predicate of the declarative clause constituting the (matrix) object (counting \"taller than it is\" as secondary predicate).) It will be a natural task to explore such extensions of the code, also transcending the sentence as annotation domain. 24",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Labeling for scope",
"sec_num": "6."
},
{
"text": "22 Wide scope readings of implicit arguments and null pronouns are not commonly encountered. 23 Cf. Nikitina (2019). 24 A medium of text representation where examples can be searched relative to strings of annotation code (as, e.g., in TypeCraft valence specifications, as exemplified in Figure 4) , could allow for a search query such as \"suCSobDECL\", which would lead to all examples annotated for subject construal into a",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 93,
"end": 95,
"text": "23",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 117,
"end": 119,
"text": "24",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 288,
"end": 297,
"text": "Figure 4)",
"ref_id": "FIGREF4"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Labeling for scope",
"sec_num": "6."
},
{
"text": "The semantic annotation system presented is an integral part of a grammatically complete annotation system, used both in corpus annotation, verb valence lexicons and formal and computational grammars. It is linked to a Type Feature Structure system sustaining formal grammars in general, and in the present system with a component of Situation Structure as an integral part. This component content-wise represents what is often referred to as lexical or conceptual semantics, but unlike most formal systems in this domain, the present version is constructed fully in terms of Typed Feature structures, whereby it has been fully integrated with the overall grammatical system. Apart from the formal interest in constructing such an architecture, the integration also gives formal expression to the circumstance that meaning, as the subject of semantics as a linguistic field, is inextricably carried by grammar, the co-construal of semantics with grammar thus being a desideratum of any formal framework of language. Thus, although representations within Situation Structure can be viewed by themselves, aspects which have a grammatical exponence can be represented with an explicit link to the exponence factor (where grammatical functions are main \"navigation points\" relative to grammatical structure). That being said, outlining the algorithmics of such a coconstrual in principle is one thing, realizing it in a large scale representation of a language is another; our description of the resources for Ga suggest that this is fully possible. The Construction Labeling (CL) formalism for annotation can help in attaining significant coverage of linguistic material, as it can be used on a purely descriptive basis (thus not in tandem with formal analysis), and especially when done in parallel with (or posterior to) more elementary grammatical analysis and glossing. This is what has been demonstrated for Ga. For Norwegian we have demonstrated that the CL code can be used in an effective interplay between grammar, valence lexicon and valence corpus, providing language-wise full scale analytic structures to which situation structure semantic information can be incrementally added. What has here been outlined resides partly in work done over the last decade, but with the formal integration of the CL system with the grammatical type representation as a novel step. With sentence analysis and sentence annotation being consolidated, we have indicated directions in which the annotation formalism can be brought into scopal analysis, and hopefully next into the analysis of larger text units representing further dimensions of analysis. The compactness of the code facilitating the annotation of large corpora for valence-and construction type, and for the construction of large valence lexicons, this holds not only from the perspective of attaining complete coverage relative to a given language, but also from cross-linguistic perspectives concerning the presence of given construction-/valence types across languages. These are the main perspectives for the use of the annotation system into cross-linguistic construction-and-valence description and typology. declarative clause, including those annotated with \"spkCSobDECLsc\" and for other embedded constituents as well.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7."
},
{
"text": "I am grateful to the three reviewers for their helpful comments. 2 On HPSG (\"Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar), seeSag 1994 andCopestake 2002.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Cf. https://propbank.github.io/;Palmer et al. (2005). 7 See Ga Valence Profile, and with examples, on Ga Appendix. For a valence profile for Norwegian, see Verbconstructions Norwegian -all types. Further examples are Valence Profile Kistaninya, Valence Profile English, and Gurene verb constructions. An inventory of CL tags in total is found at https://typecraft.org/tc2wiki/Construction_Label_tags.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "See Dakubu 2004a,b, 2008, Dakubu et al. 2007 Conducted by Prof. Dakubu, with a few consultants. 10 https://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/fndrupal/ \"Frame\" in the FrameNet system corresponds to what we here call situation type.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Cf.Hellan 2004, Hellan and Beermann 2005. 21 SeeBunt (2020) for an overview of issues relating to the annotation of quantifier scope.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Collaborative databasing and Resource sharing for Linguists. Languages Resources and Evaluation 48",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Dorothee",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beermann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lars",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": ";",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dorothee",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pavel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mihaylov",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of the HPSG04 Conference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--23",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Beermann, Dorothee and Lars Hellan. 2004. A treatment of directionals in two implemented HPSG grammars. In Stefan M\u00fcller (ed) Proceedings of the HPSG04 Conference, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven. CSLI Publications /http://csli-publications.stanford.edu/ Beermann, Dorothee and Mihaylov, Pavel. 2014. Collaborative databasing and Resource sharing for Linguists. Languages Resources and Evaluation 48. Dordrecht: Springer, 1-23.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Lexical Functional Grammar",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Joan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bresnan",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Bresnan, Joan. 2001. Lexical Functional Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Semantic Annotation of Quantification in Natural Language. Tilburg Centre for Creative Computing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Harry",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bunt",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Bunt, Harry. 2020. Semantic Annotation of Quantification in Natural Language. Tilburg Centre for Creative Computing.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Implementing Typed Feature Structure Grammars",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ann",
"middle": [],
"last": "Copestake",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2002,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Copestake, Ann. 2002. Implementing Typed Feature Structure Grammars. CSLI Publications.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ann",
"middle": [],
"last": "Copestake",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Flickinger",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ivan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sag",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Carl",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pollard",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Journal of Research on Language and Computation",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "281--332",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Copestake, Ann, Dan Flickinger, Ivan Sag and Carl Pollard. 2005. Minimal Recursion Semantics: An Introduction. Journal of Research on Language and Computation. 281-332.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "The Ga preverb k\u025b revisited",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Dakubu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kropp",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Studies in the Languages of the Volta Basin",
"volume": "2",
"issue": "",
"pages": "113--134",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dakubu, M.E. Kropp, 2004a. The Ga preverb k\u025b revisited. In Dakubu and Osam, eds., Studies in the Languages of the Volta Basin 2: 113-134. Legon: Linguistics Dept.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Ga clauses without syntactic subjects",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Dakubu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kropp",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Journal of African Languages and Linguistics",
"volume": "25",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--40",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dakubu, M.E. Kropp, 2004b. Ga clauses without syntactic subjects. Journal of African Languages and Linguistics 25.1: 1-40.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Ga verb features",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Dakubu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kropp",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "91--134",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dakubu, M.E. Kropp, 2008. Ga verb features. In Ameka and Dakubu eds., Aspect and Modality in Kwa Languages. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Co. Pp. 91-134.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Ga-English Dictionary with English-Ga Index",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Mary",
"middle": [
"Esther"
],
"last": "Dakubu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kropp",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp, 2009. Ga-English Dictionary with English-Ga Index. Accra: Black Mask Publishers.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Unpublished b. Ga Verbs and their constructions. Monograph ms",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Mary",
"middle": [
"Esther"
],
"last": "Dakubu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kropp",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp. Unpublished a. \"Ga_verb_dictionary_for_digital_processing\", accessed at https://typecraft.org/tc2wiki/Ga_Valence_Profile Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp. Unpublished b. Ga Verbs and their constructions. Monograph ms, Univ. of Ghana.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Verb Sequencing Constraints in Ga: Serial Verb Constructions and the Extended Verb Complex",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"E K"
],
"last": "Dakubu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beermann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 14 th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dakubu, M.E.K., L. Hellan and D. Beermann. 2007. Verb Sequencing Constraints in Ga: Serial Verb Constructions and the Extended Verb Complex. In St. M\u00fcller (ed) Proceedings of the 14 th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford: CSLI Publications. (/http://csli- publications.stanford.edu/)",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Verb Classes and Valency Classes in Ga",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Mary",
"middle": [
"Esther"
],
"last": "Dakubu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hellan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kropp",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "Presented at SyWAL II (Symposium on West African Languages)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dakubu, Mary Esther Kropp, and Hellan, Lars 2016. Verb Classes and Valency Classes in Ga. Presented at SyWAL II (Symposium on West African Languages), Vienna.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "A labeling system for valency: linguistic coverage and applications",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Dakubu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lars",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kropp",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Contrastive studies in Valency",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dakubu, M.E. Kropp and Lars Hellan. 2017. A labeling system for valency: linguistic coverage and applications. In Hellan, L., Malchukov, A., and Cennamo, M (eds) Contrastive studies in Valency.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Construction-Based Compositional Grammar",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lars",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Journal of Logic Language and Information",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1007/s10849-019-09284-5"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hellan, Lars. 2019a. Construction-Based Compositional Grammar. March 2019. Journal of Logic Language and Information. DOI: 10.1007/s10849-019-09284-5",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "The grammar of verbs and their arguments: a cross-linguistic perspective",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lars",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Studies in African Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hellan, Lars. 2019b. Situations in Grammar. In Essegbey, J., Kallulli, D. and Bodomo, A. (eds). The grammar of verbs and their arguments: a cross-linguistic perspective. Studies in African Linguistics. Berlin: R. K\u00f6ppe.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "A computational grammar for Ga. LREC 2020, the RAIL workshop",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lars",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hellan, Lars. 2020. A computational grammar for Ga. LREC 2020, the RAIL workshop.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Classification of Prepositional Senses for Deep Grammar Applications",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lars",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dorothee",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beermann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2nd ACL-Sigsem Workshop on The Linguistic Dimensions of Prepositions and their Use in Computational Linguistics Formalisms and Applications",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hellan, Lars and Dorothee Beermann. 2005. Classification of Prepositional Senses for Deep Grammar Applications. In: Valia Kordoni and Aline Villavicencio (eds.). Proceedings of the 2nd ACL-Sigsem Workshop on The Linguistic Dimensions of Prepositions and their Use in Computational Linguistics Formalisms and Applications.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "Identifying verb constructions cross-linguistically",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lars",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Kropp Dakubu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Studies in the Languages of the Volta Basin 6.3. Legon: Linguistics Department",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hellan, Lars and M.E. Kropp Dakubu. 2010. Identifying verb constructions cross-linguistically. In Studies in the Languages of the Volta Basin 6.3. Legon: Linguistics Department, University of Ghana.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "MultiVal: Towards a multilingual valence lexicon",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beermann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bruland",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"E K"
],
"last": "Dakubu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Marimon",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2785--2792",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hellan, L., D. Beermann, T. Bruland, M.E.K. Dakubu, and M. Marimon. 2014. MultiVal: Towards a multilingual valence lexicon. In Calzolari, Nicoletta et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2014), pages 2785-2792, Reykjav\u00edk, Iceland. ELRA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "A cluster of applications around a Deep Grammar",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lars",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tore",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bruland",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "Proceedings from The Language & Technology Conference (LTC) 2015",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hellan, Lars and Tore Bruland. 2015. A cluster of applications around a Deep Grammar. In: Vetulani et al. (eds) Proceedings from The Language & Technology Conference (LTC) 2015, Poznan.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "Creating a Norwegian valence corpus from a deep grammar",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beermann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bruland",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Haugland",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Aamot",
"middle": [],
"last": "",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings from The Language & Technology Conference (LTC) 2017",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hellan, L., Beermann, D., Bruland, T., Haugland, T., and Aamot, E. 2017. Creating a Norwegian valence corpus from a deep grammar. In: Vetulani et al. (eds) Proceedings from The Language & Technology Conference (LTC) 2017, Poznan.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "Semantic Structures",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ray",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jackendoff",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1990,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jackendoff, Ray. 1990. Semantic Structures. MIT Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Valency classes in the world's languages",
"authors": [],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Malchukov, Andrej L. & Comrie, Bernard (eds.) 2015. Valency classes in the world's languages. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. 2015.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "The mysteries of reported speech. Workshop on Reported discourse across languages and cultures",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Tatyana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nikitina",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Nikitina, Tatyana. 2019. The mysteries of reported speech. Workshop on Reported discourse across languages and cultures. LLACAN, CNRS; Paris.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "The Proposition Bank: A Corpus Annotated with Semantic Roles",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Martha",
"middle": [],
"last": "Palmer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gildea",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Paul",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kingsbury",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics Journal",
"volume": "31",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Palmer, Martha, Dan Gildea, Paul Kingsbury, The Proposition Bank: A Corpus Annotated with Semantic Roles Computational Linguistics Journal, 31:1, 2005.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Carl",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pollard",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ivan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sag",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1994,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag. 1994. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago Univ. Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "Typical Sentences as a Resource for Valence",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Uwe",
"middle": [],
"last": "Quasthoff",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lars",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hellan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Erik",
"middle": [],
"last": "K\u00f6rner",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Thomas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Eckart",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dirk",
"middle": [],
"last": "Goldhahn",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dorothee",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beermann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "2020",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Quasthoff, Uwe, Lars Hellan, Erik K\u00f6rner, Thomas Eckart, Dirk Goldhahn, Dorothee Beermann. 2020. Typical Sentences as a Resource for Valence. LREC 2020.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF29": {
"ref_id": "b29",
"title": "The parameter of aspect",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Carlota",
"middle": [],
"last": "Smith",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1991,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Smith, Carlota. 1991, 1997. The parameter of aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF30": {
"ref_id": "b30",
"title": "Linguistics in Philosophy",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Zeno",
"middle": [],
"last": "Vendler",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1967,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Vendler, Zeno. 1967. Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF31": {
"ref_id": "b31",
"title": "A Theory of Aspectuality",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Henk",
"middle": [],
"last": "Verkuyl",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1996,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Verkuyl, Henk. 1996. A Theory of Aspectuality. Cambridge University Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF32": {
"ref_id": "b32",
"title": "Language Resource References CL code: Construction Label tags Norwegian valence corpus",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Language Resource References CL code: Construction Label tags Norwegian valence corpus: https://typecraft.org/tc2wiki/Norwegian_Valency_Corpus Multilingual valence resource : http://regdili.hf.ntnu.no:8081/multilanguage_valence_demo/multi valence Ga valence profile and lexicon files: https://typecraft.org/tc2wiki/Ga_Valence_Profile",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF1": {
"num": null,
"text": "Partial Situation Type hierarchy",
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF2": {
"num": null,
"text": "Jessica loaded boxes into the wagon. \u00bb SYNTAX: Agent VERB Theme { PREP } Destination SEMANTICS: HAS_LOCATION( e1 , Theme , ?Initial_Location ) DO( e2 , Agent ) MOTION( ee3 , Theme , Trajectory ) \u00ac HAS_LOCATION( ee3 , Theme , ?Initial_Location ) CAUSE( ee3 , e2 ) HAS_LOCATION( e4 , Theme , Destination ) FORCE DYNAMICS: Volitional Apply FD representation",
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF3": {
"num": null,
"text": "Copy from VerbNet view of \"spray-9.7\"(March 27, 2020)",
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF4": {
"num": null,
"text": "Sample representation of valence annotation in a valence corpus combined with morphological glossing",
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF5": {
"num": null,
"text": "NorSource parse tree and MRS for De l\u00f8per til byen (\"they run to the town\"), with encodings relevant for directionality in italic boldface. (Copied from the web demo http://regdili.hf.ntnu.no:8081/linguisticAce/parse on March 20, 2020.)",
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure"
},
"TABREF2": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>Bodypart relation</td><td>158</td></tr><tr><td>Identity relation</td><td>110</td></tr><tr><td>Subject headed by relational noun</td><td>99</td></tr><tr><td>Object headed by relational noun</td><td>690</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Object\"s specifier headed by relational noun 29</td></tr></table>",
"num": null,
"text": "Nominal specifications in terms of number of verb entry specifications",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table"
},
"TABREF3": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>ABSENT</td><td>29</td><td>MOTIONDIREC</td><td>55</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>TED</td><td/></tr><tr><td>ACQUISITION</td><td>29</td><td>PHENOMENON</td><td>29</td></tr><tr><td>CARETAKING</td><td>12</td><td>PLACEMENT</td><td>53</td></tr><tr><td>CAUSATIVE</td><td>23</td><td>POSTURE</td><td>7</td></tr><tr><td>CAUSED</td><td>17</td><td>PROPERTY</td><td>164</td></tr><tr><td>CLOSING</td><td>4</td><td>DYNAMIC-</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td/><td/><td>PROPERTY</td><td/></tr><tr><td>COGNITION</td><td>83</td><td>PSYCHSTATE</td><td>23</td></tr><tr><td>COMMUNICATION</td><td>178</td><td>REMOVAL</td><td>47</td></tr><tr><td>COMPARISON</td><td>29</td><td>SENSATION</td><td>16</td></tr><tr><td>COMPLETED-</td><td>6</td><td>TRANSFER</td><td>47</td></tr><tr><td>MONODEVMNT</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>CONTACT</td><td>56</td><td>USINGVEHICLE</td><td>5</td></tr><tr><td>CREATION</td><td>14</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>CUTTING</td><td>19</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>EJECTION</td><td>15</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>EMOTION</td><td>29</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>EXPERIENCING</td><td>45</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>MAINTAINPOSITION</td><td>25</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>MOTION</td><td>180</td><td/><td/></tr></table>",
"num": null,
"text": "Situation Type labels most frequently applied.",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table"
}
}
}
} |