File size: 49,367 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 |
{
"paper_id": "2020",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T07:12:40.327490Z"
},
"title": "HINT3: Raising the bar for Intent Detection in the Wild",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Gaurav",
"middle": [],
"last": "Arora",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "gaurav@haptik.ai"
},
{
"first": "Jio",
"middle": [],
"last": "Haptik",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Chirag",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jain",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "chirag.jain@haptik.ai"
},
{
"first": "Manas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chaturvedi",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "manas.chaturvedi@haptik.ai"
},
{
"first": "Krupal",
"middle": [],
"last": "Modi",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "krupal@haptik.ai"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "Intent Detection systems in the real world are exposed to complexities of imbalanced datasets containing varying perception of intent, unintended correlations and domainspecific aberrations. To facilitate benchmarking which can reflect near real-world scenarios, we introduce 3 new datasets created from live chatbots in diverse domains. Unlike most existing datasets that are crowdsourced, our datasets contain real user queries received by the chatbots and facilitates penalising unwanted correlations grasped during the training process. We evaluate 4 NLU platforms and a BERT based classifier and find that performance saturates at inadequate levels on test sets because all systems latch on to unintended patterns in training data.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "2020",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "Intent Detection systems in the real world are exposed to complexities of imbalanced datasets containing varying perception of intent, unintended correlations and domainspecific aberrations. To facilitate benchmarking which can reflect near real-world scenarios, we introduce 3 new datasets created from live chatbots in diverse domains. Unlike most existing datasets that are crowdsourced, our datasets contain real user queries received by the chatbots and facilitates penalising unwanted correlations grasped during the training process. We evaluate 4 NLU platforms and a BERT based classifier and find that performance saturates at inadequate levels on test sets because all systems latch on to unintended patterns in training data.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Over the last few years, task-oriented dialogue systems have gained increasing traction for applications like personal assistants, automated customer support agents, etc. This has led to the availability of several commercialised and/or open conversational bot building platforms. Most popular systems today involve intent detection as a vital part of their Natural Language Understanding (NLU) pipeline. Recent advances in transfer learning (Howard and Ruder, 2018; Peters et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2019) has enabled systems that perform quite well on existing benchmarking datasets (Larson et al., 2019; Casanueva et al., 2020) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 442,
"end": 466,
"text": "(Howard and Ruder, 2018;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 467,
"end": 487,
"text": "Peters et al., 2018;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 488,
"end": 508,
"text": "Devlin et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 587,
"end": 608,
"text": "(Larson et al., 2019;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
},
{
"start": 609,
"end": 632,
"text": "Casanueva et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Definitions of intent often vary across users, tasks and domains. Perception of intent could range from a generic abstraction such as \"Ordering a product\" to extreme granularity such as \"Enquiring for a discount on a specific product if ordered using a specific card\". Additionally, factors such as imbalanced data distribution in the training set, assumptions during training data generation, diverse background of domain experts involved in defining the classes make this task more challenging. During inference, these systems may be deployed to users with diverse cultural backgrounds who might frame their queries differently even when communicating in the same language. Furthermore, during inference, apart from correctly identifying in-scope queries, the system is expected to accurately reject out-of-scope (Larson et al., 2019) queries, adding on to the challenge.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 815,
"end": 836,
"text": "(Larson et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Most existing datasets for intent detection are generated using crowdsourcing services. To accurately benchmark in real-world settings, we release 3 new single-domain datasets, each spanning multiple coarse and fine grain intents, with the test sets being drawn entirely from actual user queries on the live systems at scale instead of being crowdsourced. On these datasets, we find that the performance of existing systems saturates at unsatisfactory levels because they end up learning spurious patterns from the training dataset instead of generalising to the perceived meanings of intents.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "We evaluate 4 NLU platforms -Dialogflow 1 , LUIS 2 , Rasa NLU 3 , Haptik 45 and a BERT (Devlin et al., 2019) based classifier on all 3 datasets and highlight gaps in language understanding. We further probe into queries where all the current systems fail and question the efficacy of the current approach of learning. Additionally, we repeat all our experiments on the subset of training data and show a performance drop in all the systems despite retaining relevant and sufficient utterances in the training subset. We've made our datasets and code freely accessible on GitHub to promote ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 87,
"end": 108,
"text": "(Devlin et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Despite intent detection being an important component of most dialogue systems, very few datasets have been collected from real users. Web Apps, Ask Ubuntu and Chatbot datasets from (Braun et al., 2017 ) contain a limited number of intents (<10), oversimplifying the task. More recent datasets like HWU64 from (Liu et al., 2019) and CLINC150 from (Larson et al., 2019 ) span a large number of intents in multiple domains but are generated using crowd sourcing services hence are limited in diversity in user expressions which arise from but not limited to domain specific presumptions, context from how and where the bot is made available, paraphrases emerging from cultural and ethnic diversity of user base, conversational slang, etc. Our work has some similarity with CLINC150, in that they also highlight the problem of out-ofscope intent detection and with BANKING77 from (Casanueva et al., 2020 ) that focuses on a single domain. However, all three -HWU64, CLINC150, ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 182,
"end": 201,
"text": "(Braun et al., 2017",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 310,
"end": 328,
"text": "(Liu et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
},
{
"start": 347,
"end": 367,
"text": "(Larson et al., 2019",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
},
{
"start": 877,
"end": 900,
"text": "(Casanueva et al., 2020",
"ref_id": "BIBREF3"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Prior Work",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "We introduce HINT3, a collection of datasets shown in Table 2 -SOFMattress, Curekart and Powerplay11 each containing diverse set of intents in a single domain -mattress products retail, fitness supplements retail and online gaming respectively. Table 1 shows few example intents of varying granularity in HINT3 dataset, along with examples of training queries created by domain experts and in-scope, out-of-scope queries received from real users.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 54,
"end": 61,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF3"
},
{
"start": 245,
"end": 252,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Datasets",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "Training data is prepared by a team of domain experts trying to emulate real users after in-depth research of historical user queries. The experts do not create an explicit set of out of scope queries primarily because the universe of such queries is infinitely big. Training datasets show class imbalance, occurrence of domain specific words, acronyms 7 . All training data queries are in English.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Training Data Collection",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "In addition to Full training sets, we create Subset versions for each training set. For each class, after retaining the first query we iterate over the 7 github.com/hellohaptik/HINT3/tree/master/data exploration rest, discarding a query if it has an entailment score (Bowman et al., 2015) greater than 0.6 in both directions with any of the queries retained so far i.e. the subset version has the following property",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dataset Variants",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "E(x a , x b ) \u2264 0.6 \u2227 E(x b , x a ) \u2264 0.6; a = b, a \u2208 [1, |X i |], b \u2208 [1, |X i |] \u2200 I",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dataset Variants",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "where I is the set of all intents,X i is the set of queries retained for class i, E(h, p) is the entailment scoring function with h as hypothesis and p as premise. We use ELMo model trained on SNLI (Peters et al., 2018; Parikh et al., 2016) 8 for E(h, p). These are intended to evaluate performance with only semantically different sentences in the training set as ideally systems should already understand semantically similar queries to the ones present in the training set. ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 198,
"end": 219,
"text": "(Peters et al., 2018;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 220,
"end": 242,
"text": "Parikh et al., 2016) 8",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dataset Variants",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Our test sets contain the first message received by live systems from real users over a period of 15 days. Inter-annotator agreement was 75.8%, 80.0% and 73.4% for SOFMattress, Curekart and Power-play11 respectively and conflicts were resolved by domain experts. One major reason for low interannotator agreement was unclear criteria for defining an intent which sometimes lead to overlapping intents of different levels of granularity, even after we had made sure to manually merge any conflicting or highly similar intents in the training data. Directly coming from real users our test set queries also contain messaging slangs, acronyms, spelling mistakes, grammatical mistakes and usage of code-mixed languages 7 . Queries in non-Latin script or code-mixed languages were marked as out of scope (labelled as NO NODES DETECTED). Since live chat systems don't cater all the queries related to a brand, our test set contains relevant outof-scope queries received from users about that domain. Any identifiable information of users, brands was replaced with made-up values in both train and test sets.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Test Data Collection and Annotation",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "We evaluated the performance of our datasets on platforms like Dialogflow, LUIS, RASA and Haptik in addition to evaluating performance on BERT. All layers of BERT were fine-tuned with a learning rate of 4e-5 for up to 50 epochs with a warmup period of 0.1 and early stopping.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Benchmark Evaluation",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "We use thresholds on the model's probability estimate for the task of predicting whether a query is OOS. We show performance on thresholds ranging from 0.1 to 0.9 at an interval of 0.1 to show the maximum performance a model can achieve irrespective of how we choose the threshold.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Out-Of-Scope (OOS) prediction",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "We consider Accuracy and Matthew's Correlation Coefficient 9 as overall performance metrics for the systems. We use OOS recall (Larson et al., 2019) to evaluate performance on OOS queries and accuracy of in-scope queries to evaluate performance on inscope queries. Figure 1 presents results for all systems, for both Full and Subset variations of the dataset. Best Accuracy on all the datasets is in the early 70s. Best MCC for the datasets varies from 0.4 to 0.6, suggesting the systems are far from perfectly understanding natural language.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 127,
"end": 148,
"text": "(Larson et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 265,
"end": 273,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Metrics",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "In Table 3 , we consider in-scope accuracy at a very low threshold of 0.1, to see if false positives on OOS queries would not have mattered, what's the maximum in-scope accuracy that current systems are able to achieve. Our results show that even with such a low threshold, the maximum in-scope accuracy which systems are able to achieve on Full Training set is pretty low, unlike the 90+ in-scope accuracies of these systems which have been reported on other public datasets like CLINC150 in (Larson et al., 2019) . And, the in-scope accuracy is even worse for the Subset of the training data. Table 5 shows percentage drop in in-scope accuracy on subset data across all systems as compared to in-scope accuracy on full data. The drop varies from 0.6% to 22.3% across datasets and platforms. In an ideal world, this drop should be close to 0 across all datasets, as if the system understands the meaning of queries in training data, its performance should not get affected at all by removing queries in training data which are semantically similar to the ones already present.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 493,
"end": 514,
"text": "(Larson et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 3,
"end": 10,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF5"
},
{
"start": 595,
"end": 602,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": "TABREF8"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "Analyzing few example queries which failed on all platforms in Table 4 suggests that these models Figure 2 : Out-of-Scope (OOS) Recall at the cost of Inscope Accuracy for SOFMattress Full dataset aren't actually \"understanding\" language or capturing \"meaning\", instead capturing spurious patterns in training data, as was also pointed in (Bender and Koller, 2020) . Predicting based on these spurious patterns, which models latch on to during training, leads to models having high confidence even on OOS queries. Figure 2 shows this behaviour on SOFMattress Full dataset, as significant percentage of OOS queries have high confidence scores on all systems, except LUIS, for which it is at the cost of in-scope accuracy.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 338,
"end": 363,
"text": "(Bender and Koller, 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 63,
"end": 70,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": "TABREF7"
},
{
"start": 98,
"end": 106,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 513,
"end": 521,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "This paper analyzed intent detection on 3 new datasets consisting of both in-scope and out-ofscope queries received on 3 live chat bots over a period of 15 days. Our findings indicate that there's a significant gap in performance on crowdsourced datasets vs in a real world setup. NLU systems don't seem to be actually \"understanding\" language or capturing \"meaning\". We believe our analysis and dataset will lead to developing better, more robust dialogue systems.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "https://cloud.google.com/dialogflow 2 https://www.luis.ai/ 3 https://github.com/RasaHQ/rasa/ 4 https://haptik.ai 5 Access requests for signup on Haptik are processed via contact form at https://haptik.ai/contact-us/",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "https://demo.allennlp.org/textual-entailment",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/model evaluation",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [
{
"text": "We are grateful to Bot Analysts at Haptik, especially Aaron Dsouza 10 , who helped us open-source HINT3 datasets. We also want to thank clients of Haptik who allowed us to share queries received on their bots with the research community.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Acknowledgments",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Emily",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Bender",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Alexander",
"middle": [],
"last": "Koller",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "5185--5198",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.463"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Emily M. Bender and Alexander Koller. 2020. Climb- ing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and under- standing in the age of data. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, pages 5185-5198, Online. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inference",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Samuel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gabor",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bowman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christopher",
"middle": [],
"last": "Angeli",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christopher",
"middle": [
"D"
],
"last": "Potts",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Manning",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "632--642",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/D15-1075"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Samuel R. Bowman, Gabor Angeli, Christopher Potts, and Christopher D. Manning. 2015. A large anno- tated corpus for learning natural language inference. In Proceedings of the 2015 Conference on Empiri- cal Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 632-642, Lisbon, Portugal. Association for Compu- tational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Evaluating natural language understanding services for conversational question answering systems",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Daniel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Braun",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Adrian",
"middle": [
"Hernandez"
],
"last": "Mendez",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Florian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Matthes",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Manfred",
"middle": [],
"last": "Langen",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 18th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Discourse and Dialogue",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "174--185",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/W17-5522"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Daniel Braun, Adrian Hernandez Mendez, Florian Matthes, and Manfred Langen. 2017. Evaluating natural language understanding services for conver- sational question answering systems. In Proceed- ings of the 18th Annual SIGdial Meeting on Dis- course and Dialogue, pages 174-185, Saarbr\u00fccken, Germany. Association for Computational Linguis- tics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Efficient intent detection with dual sentence encoders",
"authors": [
{
"first": "I\u00f1igo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Casanueva",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tadas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tem\u010dinas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Daniela",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gerz",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Matthew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Henderson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ivan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Vuli\u0107",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Conversational AI",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "38--45",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/2020.nlp4convai-1.5"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "I\u00f1igo Casanueva, Tadas Tem\u010dinas, Daniela Gerz, Matthew Henderson, and Ivan Vuli\u0107. 2020. Efficient intent detection with dual sentence encoders. In Pro- ceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Natural Language Processing for Conversational AI, pages 38-45, On- line. Association for Computational Linguistics. 10 Reachable at aaron.dsouza@haptik.ai",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jacob",
"middle": [],
"last": "Devlin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ming-Wei",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kenton",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kristina",
"middle": [],
"last": "Toutanova",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "4171--4186",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/N19-1423"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language under- standing. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4171-4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jeremy",
"middle": [],
"last": "Howard",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sebastian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ruder",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "328--339",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/P18-1031"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jeremy Howard and Sebastian Ruder. 2018. Universal language model fine-tuning for text classification. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the As- sociation for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 328-339, Melbourne, Australia. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "An evaluation dataset for intent classification and out-of-scope prediction",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Stefan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Larson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Anish",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mahendran",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Joseph",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Peper",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christopher",
"middle": [],
"last": "Clarke",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Parker",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hill",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jonathan",
"middle": [
"K"
],
"last": "Kummerfeld",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kevin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Leach",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Laurenzano",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lingjia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jason",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mars",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1311--1316",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/D19-1131"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Stefan Larson, Anish Mahendran, Joseph J. Peper, Christopher Clarke, Andrew Lee, Parker Hill, Jonathan K. Kummerfeld, Kevin Leach, Michael A. Laurenzano, Lingjia Tang, and Jason Mars. 2019. An evaluation dataset for intent classification and out-of-scope prediction. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natu- ral Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 1311-1316, Hong Kong, China. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Benchmarking natural language understanding services for building conversational agents",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Xingkun",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Arash",
"middle": [],
"last": "Eshghi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pawel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Swietojanski",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Verena",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rieser",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems Technology (IWSDS)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Xingkun Liu, Arash Eshghi, Pawel Swietojanski, and Verena Rieser. 2019. Benchmarking natural lan- guage understanding services for building conversa- tional agents. In Proceedings of the Tenth Interna- tional Workshop on Spoken Dialogue Systems Tech- nology (IWSDS), pages xxx-xxx, Ortigia, Siracusa (SR), Italy. Springer.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "A decomposable attention model for natural language inference",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ankur",
"middle": [],
"last": "Parikh",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Oscar",
"middle": [],
"last": "T\u00e4ckstr\u00f6m",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dipanjan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Das",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jakob",
"middle": [],
"last": "Uszkoreit",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2249--2255",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/D16-1244"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ankur Parikh, Oscar T\u00e4ckstr\u00f6m, Dipanjan Das, and Jakob Uszkoreit. 2016. A decomposable attention model for natural language inference. In Proceed- ings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 2249-2255, Austin, Texas. Association for Computational Lin- guistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Deep contextualized word representations",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Matthew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Peters",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mark",
"middle": [],
"last": "Neumann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mohit",
"middle": [],
"last": "Iyyer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Matt",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gardner",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christopher",
"middle": [],
"last": "Clark",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kenton",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Luke",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zettlemoyer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2227--2237",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/N18-1202"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Matthew Peters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. Deep contextualized word rep- resentations. In Proceedings of the 2018 Confer- ence of the North American Chapter of the Associ- ation for Computational Linguistics: Human Lan- guage Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 2227-2237, New Orleans, Louisiana. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"text": "Matthew's Correlation Coefficient and Accuracy across all datasets and platforms",
"type_str": "figure",
"num": null,
"uris": null
},
"TABREF1": {
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": ""
},
"TABREF3": {
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": "Statistics of the 3 datasets in HINT3BANKING77 offer relatively large and well balanced training set which might not be always feasible to collect for every new domain. For all datasets mentioned so far, recent works have reported a reasonably high performance (>90% average) for in-scope queries. Despite this, gaps in language understanding become apparent when such systems are deployed. Datasets introduced in this paper and further analysis of results attempts to recognise critical gaps in language understanding and calls for further research into more robust methods."
},
"TABREF5": {
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": "Inscope Accuracy at low threshold=0.1 for Full and Subset data variants"
},
"TABREF6": {
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td>Test query</td><td>True label</td><td>Top predicted label</td><td>Sample training queries for True label</td><td>Sample training queries for predicted label</td></tr><tr><td>Ergo 7272 inches price?</td><td>MATTRESS COST</td><td>L,H,D,R: ERGO FEATURES</td><td>\u2022 Price of mattress \u2022 Custom size cost</td><td>\u2022 Features of Ergo mattress \u2022 Tell me about SOF Ergo mattress</td></tr><tr><td>Trail option are there</td><td>100 NIGHT TRIAL OFFER</td><td>L,H,D: COD R: EMI</td><td>\u2022 Trial details \u2022 How to enroll for trial</td><td>\u2022 Can I get COD option? \u2022 Can it deliver by COD</td></tr><tr><td>I require 75 inch 57 inch. Is it available? Covid19 how can you deliver</td><td>SIZE CUSTOMIZATION NO NODES DETECTED</td><td>L: DISTRIBUTORS H,D,R: L,H,D,R: CHECK PINCODE L,H,D,R: CHECK PINCODE</td><td>-</td><td>\u2022 Do you deliver to my pincode \u2022 Will you be able to deliver here</td></tr></table>",
"text": "WHAT SIZE TO ORDER \u2022 Will I get an option to Customise the size \u2022 How can I order a custom sized mattress \u2022 Want to know the custom size chart \u2022 Show me all available sizes 20 % discount available on emi OFFERS L,H,D,R: EMI \u2022 Want to know the discount \u2022 Tell me about the latest offers \u2022 You guys provide EMI option? \u2022 No cost EMI is available? How will u deliver with this LockDown in place ? NO NODES DETECTED"
},
"TABREF7": {
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"html": null,
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td>SOF Mattress</td><td>Curekart</td><td>Power play11</td></tr><tr><td>Dialogflow</td><td>10.6</td><td>5.0</td><td>6.7</td></tr><tr><td>RASA</td><td>18.7</td><td>4.1</td><td>10.5</td></tr><tr><td>LUIS</td><td>16.8</td><td>1.2</td><td>8.3</td></tr><tr><td>Haptik</td><td>11.3</td><td>0.6</td><td>10.9</td></tr><tr><td>BERT</td><td>22.3</td><td>1.5</td><td>9.4</td></tr></table>",
"text": "Few examples of test queries in SOFMattress which failed on all platforms, L: LUIS, H: Haptik, D: Dialogflow, R: Rasa. NO NODES DETECTED is the out-of-scope label."
},
"TABREF8": {
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"html": null,
"content": "<table/>",
"text": "Percentage drop in Inscope Accuracy at low threshold=0.1 in Subset data as compared to Full"
}
}
}
} |