File size: 195,400 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 2081 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 2091 2092 2093 2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 2218 2219 2220 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 2367 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 2394 2395 2396 2397 2398 2399 2400 2401 2402 2403 2404 2405 2406 2407 2408 2409 2410 2411 2412 2413 2414 2415 2416 2417 2418 2419 2420 2421 2422 2423 2424 2425 2426 2427 2428 2429 2430 2431 2432 2433 2434 2435 2436 2437 2438 2439 2440 2441 2442 2443 2444 2445 2446 2447 2448 2449 2450 2451 2452 2453 2454 2455 2456 2457 2458 2459 2460 2461 2462 2463 2464 2465 2466 2467 2468 2469 2470 2471 2472 2473 2474 2475 2476 2477 2478 2479 2480 2481 2482 2483 2484 2485 2486 2487 2488 2489 2490 2491 2492 2493 2494 2495 2496 2497 2498 2499 2500 2501 2502 2503 2504 2505 2506 2507 2508 2509 2510 2511 2512 2513 2514 2515 2516 2517 2518 2519 2520 2521 2522 2523 2524 2525 2526 2527 2528 2529 2530 2531 2532 2533 2534 2535 2536 2537 2538 2539 2540 2541 2542 2543 2544 2545 2546 2547 2548 2549 2550 2551 2552 2553 2554 2555 2556 2557 2558 2559 2560 2561 2562 2563 2564 2565 2566 2567 2568 2569 2570 2571 2572 2573 2574 2575 2576 2577 2578 2579 2580 2581 2582 2583 2584 2585 2586 2587 2588 2589 2590 2591 2592 2593 2594 2595 2596 2597 2598 2599 2600 2601 2602 2603 2604 2605 2606 2607 2608 2609 2610 2611 2612 2613 2614 2615 2616 2617 2618 2619 2620 2621 2622 2623 2624 2625 2626 2627 2628 2629 2630 2631 2632 2633 2634 2635 2636 2637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 2645 2646 2647 2648 2649 2650 2651 2652 2653 2654 2655 2656 2657 2658 2659 2660 2661 2662 2663 2664 2665 2666 2667 2668 2669 2670 2671 2672 2673 2674 2675 2676 2677 2678 2679 2680 2681 2682 2683 2684 2685 2686 2687 2688 2689 2690 2691 2692 2693 2694 2695 2696 2697 2698 2699 2700 2701 2702 2703 2704 2705 2706 2707 2708 2709 2710 2711 2712 2713 2714 2715 2716 2717 2718 2719 2720 2721 2722 2723 2724 2725 2726 2727 2728 2729 2730 2731 2732 2733 2734 2735 2736 2737 2738 2739 2740 2741 2742 2743 2744 2745 2746 2747 2748 2749 2750 2751 2752 2753 2754 2755 2756 2757 2758 2759 2760 2761 2762 2763 2764 2765 2766 2767 2768 2769 2770 2771 2772 2773 2774 2775 2776 2777 2778 2779 2780 2781 2782 2783 2784 2785 2786 2787 2788 2789 2790 2791 2792 2793 2794 2795 2796 2797 2798 2799 2800 2801 2802 2803 2804 2805 2806 2807 2808 2809 2810 2811 2812 2813 2814 2815 2816 2817 2818 2819 2820 2821 2822 2823 2824 2825 2826 2827 2828 2829 2830 2831 2832 2833 2834 2835 2836 2837 2838 2839 2840 2841 2842 2843 2844 2845 2846 2847 2848 2849 2850 2851 2852 2853 2854 2855 2856 2857 2858 2859 2860 2861 2862 2863 2864 2865 2866 2867 2868 2869 2870 2871 2872 2873 2874 2875 2876 2877 2878 2879 2880 2881 2882 2883 2884 2885 2886 2887 2888 2889 2890 2891 2892 2893 2894 2895 2896 2897 2898 2899 2900 2901 2902 2903 2904 2905 2906 2907 2908 2909 2910 2911 2912 2913 2914 2915 2916 2917 2918 2919 2920 2921 2922 2923 2924 2925 2926 2927 2928 2929 2930 2931 2932 2933 2934 2935 2936 2937 2938 2939 2940 2941 2942 2943 2944 2945 2946 2947 2948 2949 2950 2951 2952 2953 2954 2955 2956 2957 2958 2959 2960 2961 2962 2963 2964 2965 2966 2967 2968 2969 2970 2971 2972 2973 2974 2975 2976 2977 2978 2979 2980 2981 2982 2983 2984 2985 2986 2987 2988 2989 2990 2991 2992 2993 2994 2995 2996 2997 2998 2999 3000 3001 3002 3003 3004 3005 3006 3007 3008 3009 3010 3011 3012 3013 3014 3015 3016 3017 3018 3019 3020 3021 3022 3023 3024 3025 3026 3027 3028 3029 3030 3031 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036 3037 3038 3039 3040 3041 3042 3043 3044 3045 3046 3047 3048 3049 3050 3051 3052 3053 3054 3055 3056 3057 3058 3059 3060 3061 3062 3063 3064 3065 3066 3067 3068 3069 3070 3071 3072 3073 3074 3075 3076 3077 3078 3079 3080 3081 3082 3083 3084 3085 3086 3087 3088 3089 3090 3091 3092 3093 3094 3095 3096 3097 3098 3099 3100 3101 3102 3103 3104 3105 3106 3107 3108 3109 3110 3111 3112 3113 3114 3115 3116 3117 3118 3119 3120 3121 3122 3123 3124 3125 3126 3127 3128 3129 3130 3131 3132 3133 3134 3135 3136 3137 3138 3139 3140 3141 3142 3143 3144 3145 3146 3147 3148 3149 3150 3151 3152 3153 3154 3155 3156 3157 3158 3159 3160 3161 3162 3163 3164 3165 3166 3167 3168 3169 3170 3171 3172 3173 3174 3175 3176 3177 3178 3179 3180 3181 3182 3183 3184 3185 3186 3187 3188 3189 3190 3191 3192 3193 3194 3195 3196 3197 3198 3199 3200 3201 3202 3203 3204 3205 3206 3207 3208 3209 3210 3211 3212 3213 3214 3215 3216 3217 3218 3219 3220 3221 3222 3223 3224 3225 3226 3227 3228 3229 3230 3231 3232 3233 3234 3235 3236 3237 3238 3239 3240 3241 3242 3243 3244 3245 3246 3247 3248 3249 3250 3251 3252 3253 3254 3255 3256 3257 3258 3259 3260 3261 3262 3263 3264 3265 3266 3267 3268 3269 3270 3271 3272 3273 3274 3275 3276 3277 3278 3279 3280 3281 3282 3283 3284 3285 3286 3287 3288 3289 3290 3291 3292 3293 3294 3295 3296 3297 3298 3299 3300 3301 3302 3303 3304 3305 3306 3307 3308 3309 3310 3311 3312 3313 3314 3315 3316 3317 3318 3319 3320 3321 3322 3323 3324 3325 3326 3327 3328 3329 3330 3331 3332 3333 3334 3335 3336 3337 3338 3339 3340 3341 3342 3343 3344 3345 3346 3347 3348 3349 3350 3351 3352 3353 3354 3355 3356 3357 3358 3359 3360 3361 3362 3363 3364 3365 3366 3367 3368 3369 3370 3371 3372 3373 3374 3375 3376 3377 3378 3379 3380 3381 3382 3383 3384 3385 3386 3387 3388 3389 3390 3391 3392 3393 3394 3395 3396 3397 3398 3399 3400 3401 3402 3403 3404 3405 3406 3407 3408 3409 3410 3411 3412 3413 3414 3415 3416 3417 3418 3419 3420 3421 3422 3423 3424 3425 3426 3427 3428 3429 3430 3431 3432 3433 3434 3435 3436 3437 3438 3439 3440 3441 3442 3443 3444 3445 3446 3447 3448 3449 3450 3451 3452 3453 3454 3455 3456 3457 3458 3459 3460 3461 3462 3463 3464 3465 3466 3467 3468 3469 3470 3471 3472 3473 3474 3475 3476 3477 3478 3479 3480 3481 3482 3483 3484 3485 3486 3487 3488 3489 3490 3491 3492 3493 3494 3495 3496 3497 3498 3499 3500 3501 3502 3503 3504 3505 3506 3507 3508 3509 3510 3511 3512 3513 3514 3515 3516 3517 3518 3519 3520 3521 3522 3523 3524 3525 3526 3527 3528 3529 3530 3531 3532 3533 3534 3535 3536 3537 3538 3539 3540 3541 3542 3543 3544 3545 3546 3547 3548 3549 3550 3551 3552 3553 3554 3555 3556 3557 3558 3559 3560 3561 3562 3563 3564 3565 3566 3567 3568 3569 3570 3571 3572 3573 3574 3575 3576 3577 3578 3579 3580 3581 3582 3583 3584 3585 3586 3587 3588 3589 3590 3591 3592 3593 3594 3595 3596 3597 3598 3599 3600 3601 3602 3603 3604 3605 3606 3607 3608 3609 3610 3611 3612 3613 3614 3615 3616 3617 3618 3619 3620 3621 3622 3623 3624 3625 3626 3627 3628 3629 3630 3631 3632 3633 3634 3635 3636 3637 3638 3639 3640 3641 3642 3643 3644 3645 3646 3647 3648 3649 3650 3651 3652 3653 3654 3655 3656 3657 3658 3659 3660 3661 3662 3663 3664 3665 3666 3667 3668 3669 3670 3671 3672 3673 3674 3675 3676 3677 3678 3679 3680 3681 3682 3683 3684 3685 3686 3687 3688 3689 3690 3691 3692 3693 3694 3695 3696 3697 3698 3699 3700 3701 3702 3703 3704 3705 3706 3707 3708 3709 3710 3711 3712 3713 3714 3715 3716 3717 3718 3719 3720 3721 3722 3723 3724 3725 3726 3727 3728 3729 3730 3731 3732 3733 3734 3735 3736 3737 3738 3739 3740 3741 3742 3743 3744 3745 3746 3747 3748 3749 3750 3751 3752 3753 3754 3755 3756 3757 3758 3759 3760 3761 3762 3763 3764 3765 3766 3767 3768 3769 3770 3771 3772 3773 3774 3775 3776 3777 3778 3779 3780 3781 3782 3783 3784 3785 3786 3787 3788 3789 3790 3791 3792 3793 3794 3795 3796 3797 3798 3799 3800 3801 3802 3803 3804 3805 3806 3807 3808 3809 3810 3811 3812 3813 3814 3815 3816 3817 3818 3819 3820 3821 3822 3823 3824 3825 3826 3827 3828 3829 3830 3831 3832 3833 3834 3835 3836 3837 3838 3839 3840 3841 3842 3843 3844 3845 3846 3847 3848 3849 3850 3851 3852 3853 3854 3855 3856 3857 3858 3859 3860 3861 3862 3863 3864 3865 3866 3867 3868 3869 3870 3871 3872 3873 3874 3875 3876 3877 3878 3879 3880 3881 3882 3883 3884 3885 3886 3887 3888 3889 3890 3891 3892 3893 3894 3895 3896 3897 3898 3899 3900 3901 3902 3903 3904 3905 3906 3907 3908 3909 3910 3911 3912 3913 3914 3915 3916 3917 3918 3919 3920 3921 3922 3923 3924 3925 3926 3927 3928 3929 3930 3931 3932 3933 3934 3935 3936 3937 3938 3939 3940 3941 3942 3943 3944 3945 3946 3947 3948 3949 3950 3951 3952 3953 3954 3955 3956 3957 3958 3959 3960 3961 3962 3963 3964 3965 3966 3967 3968 3969 3970 3971 3972 3973 3974 3975 3976 3977 3978 3979 3980 3981 3982 3983 3984 3985 3986 3987 3988 3989 3990 3991 3992 3993 3994 3995 3996 3997 3998 3999 4000 4001 4002 4003 4004 4005 4006 4007 4008 4009 |
{
"paper_id": "2022",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T07:33:03.962944Z"
},
"title": "A Design Space for Writing Support Tools Using a Cognitive Process Model of Writing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Katy",
"middle": [
"Ilonka"
],
"last": "Gero",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Columbia University",
"location": {}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Alex",
"middle": [],
"last": "Calderwood",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "University Of California",
"location": {
"settlement": "Santa Cruz"
}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Charlotte",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Columbia University",
"location": {}
},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Lydia",
"middle": [
"B"
],
"last": "Chilton",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "Columbia University",
"location": {}
},
"email": "chilton@cs.columbia.edu"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "Improvements in language technology have led to an increasing interest in writing support tools. In this paper we propose a design space for such tools based on a cognitive process model of writing. We conduct a systematic review of recent computer science papers that present and/or study such tools, analyzing 30 papers from the last five years using the design space. Tools are plotted according to three distinct cognitive processes-planning, translating, and reviewing-and the level of constraint each process entails. Analyzing recent work with the design space shows that highly constrained planning and reviewing are under-studied areas that recent technology improvements may now be able to serve. Finally, we propose shared evaluation methodologies and tasks that may help the field mature.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "2022",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "Improvements in language technology have led to an increasing interest in writing support tools. In this paper we propose a design space for such tools based on a cognitive process model of writing. We conduct a systematic review of recent computer science papers that present and/or study such tools, analyzing 30 papers from the last five years using the design space. Tools are plotted according to three distinct cognitive processes-planning, translating, and reviewing-and the level of constraint each process entails. Analyzing recent work with the design space shows that highly constrained planning and reviewing are under-studied areas that recent technology improvements may now be able to serve. Finally, we propose shared evaluation methodologies and tasks that may help the field mature.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "The development of large-scale language models (sometimes called foundation models) is dramatically changing what technology can achieve and support (Bommasani et al., 2021) . Language models like GPT3 (Brown et al., 2020) and Meena (Adiwardana et al., 2020) have led to an increasing interest in how these new technologies may support writers, for instance by providing a journalist with text in the style of The New Yorker (Seabrook, 2019) or giving a novelist a new story ending (Marche, 2021) . In this paper we seek to understand where research on writing support tools currently stands, and what areas of research may be important but currently under-served.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 149,
"end": 173,
"text": "(Bommasani et al., 2021)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 202,
"end": 222,
"text": "(Brown et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 233,
"end": 258,
"text": "(Adiwardana et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 425,
"end": 441,
"text": "(Seabrook, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF41"
},
{
"start": 482,
"end": 496,
"text": "(Marche, 2021)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF27"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Computational approaches to writing support have a long and rich history, certainly dating back to before the introduction of modern computation, at least to the early 1900s with the cut-up method (Burroughs, 1961) and 'plot genie' books (Hill, 1931) , and likely even further back when considering the long history of generative traditions such as tarot cards (Sullivan et al., 2018) . In more contemporary understandings of computation, technology developed by the natural language processing (NLP) community is often taken up as a writing tool. 1 We believe the advent of foundation models poses an exciting inflection point at which these technologies can be used to support the evergreen activity of writing in new ways.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 197,
"end": 214,
"text": "(Burroughs, 1961)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 238,
"end": 250,
"text": "(Hill, 1931)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
},
{
"start": 361,
"end": 384,
"text": "(Sullivan et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF44"
},
{
"start": 548,
"end": 549,
"text": "1",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "In this paper, we draw on a cognitive process model of writing that considers writing to be a goal-directed thinking process with three distinct and non-linear cognitive processes: planning, translating, and reviewing (Flower and Hayes, 1981) . We use this model to propose a design space for writing support tools. This allows us to understand what a writing support tool is attempting to support, and identify gaps or opportunities in the field. It provides a shared vocabulary for researchers, and we hope it will help the field mature and provide common goals and methodologies.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 218,
"end": 242,
"text": "(Flower and Hayes, 1981)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF8"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "To demonstrate the use of the design space, we perform a systematic literature review of research on writing support tools from the last five years (2017) (2018) (2019) (2020) (2021) . This shows areas of active research and under-served areas, as well as limitations of current technology to support different aspects of writing. We also use these papers to investigate how to evaluate writing support tools.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 148,
"end": 154,
"text": "(2017)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 155,
"end": 161,
"text": "(2018)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 162,
"end": 168,
"text": "(2019)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 169,
"end": 175,
"text": "(2020)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 176,
"end": 182,
"text": "(2021)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "The contributions of this paper are:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 A design space for writing support tools, based on a cognitive process model of writing.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 A systematic literature review of writing support tools (n papers = 30) from 2017-2021.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 A gap analysis highlighting opportunities for designing future writing support tools.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 A series of common evaluation methodologies for future work to draw on. Flower and Hayes (1981) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 74,
"end": 97,
"text": "Flower and Hayes (1981)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF8"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "2 Related Work 2.1 A Cognitive Process Model of Writing Flower and Hayes (1981) theory of the cognitive processes involved in writing laid the groundwork for a plethora of research on the psychology of writing over the past four decades. This process model, backed by empirical studies, proposed that writing is best understood as a set of distinct hierarchical thinking processes. Figure 1 shows a schematic of the model, with the three main writing processesplanning, translating 2 , and reviewing-highlighted in yellow. When Flower and Hayes state that these processes are hierarchical, they mean they can be called upon iteratively, being embedded within each other. For example, when a writer is constructing a sentence (translating), they may call in a compressed version of the entire writing process. Flower and Hayes' are also quick to note that these processes are not linear. While a common mantra is to 'plan, then write, then review', in reality writers are making plans and reviewing what they have written all throughout the writing process. Flower and Hayes also proposed that the act of writing is propelled by goals, which are created by the writer and grow in number as the writing progresses. These goals, which span in complexity and abstraction from 'appeal to a broad audience' to 'don't use that cliche', are what direct the writer to different processes. We can model the writing process by considering the writer's goals and what 2 They use the word 'translating' to refer to the act of putting words on the page, as 'writing' is used to describe the whole process and 'composing' can also be ambiguous. While 'translating' is typically used in NLP communities to denote converting text between languages, we use it here as a technical term to aligns with relevant psychology research. processes they enlist to achieve them.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 56,
"end": 79,
"text": "Flower and Hayes (1981)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF8"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 382,
"end": 390,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "While this model has since been updated with an increase in complexity 3 , considering how goals propel the writing process remains a useful model. Writing has long been considered a mode of learning, as it is both a process and a product, which allows near-constant reflection on the ideas the writer is trying to express (Emig, 1977) . By considering a writer's shifting goals, writing researchers have understood why mature writers are able to learn from their writing (Scardamalia and Bereiter, 1987) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 323,
"end": 335,
"text": "(Emig, 1977)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
},
{
"start": 472,
"end": 504,
"text": "(Scardamalia and Bereiter, 1987)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF39"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "We make use of this theory to structure a design space for writing support tools: to understand what these tool actually help with, and how we might design new ones. While there are many ways to think about writing and how computers may support it, we focus on the cognitive process model as it emphasizes writers' intentions, rather than their actions. We believe that this abstraction away from the mechanics of writing will help researchers articulate their intentions with writing support tools, and share results across disparate writing tasks.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "One way to synthesize a multitude of designs is to envision it in a 'design space', or a metaphorical laying out of designs according to some metrics or measures. MacLean et al. (1996) describe design space analysis as an approach to representing design rationale. In this view, a design space places a design in a \"space of possibilities\" and uses this placement to explain why a design was chosen among all the various possibilities. This frames design spaces as a useful way of communicating with stakeholders. By explaining why a design was chosen, stakeholders can better sell, maintain, and otherwise interact with a product. Woodbury and Burrow (2006) , addressing the growing popularity of design spaces in computational research, describe design space exploration as the idea that we can use exploring alternatives as a compelling model of design. This involves representing designs in a meaningful way, and using the representation to explore the space. 4 A popular and highly-cited example of a design space comes from wireless sensor networks (Romer and Mattern, 2004) . As the use of such networks increased globally, \"it was very difficult to discuss specific application requirements, research directions, and challenges.\" The proposed solution was a sensor network design space: its various dimensions would be categorized in order to both understand the existing research as well as discover new designs and applications. One conclusion was that a small set of platforms could cover the majority of the design space, rather than requiring numerous, application-specific platforms.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 163,
"end": 184,
"text": "MacLean et al. (1996)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
},
{
"start": 632,
"end": 658,
"text": "Woodbury and Burrow (2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF52"
},
{
"start": 964,
"end": 965,
"text": "4",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1055,
"end": 1080,
"text": "(Romer and Mattern, 2004)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF38"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Design Spaces",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "In this paper we introduce a design space both to think about what writing support tools currently do, and what we might want them to do in the future. In this sense we take both MacLean's and Woodbury's view: the design space is both a way to talk about why existing tools are the way they are, as well as a way to design new ones.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Design Spaces",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "Related work has looked at a design space for nonvisual word completion (Nicolau et al., 2019) and hybrid paper-digital interfaces (Han et al., 2021) . We look to these for methodologies and areas of overlapping interest. Perhaps more related is work from Strobl et al. (2019) in which they perform a review on digital support for academic writing. They review 44 papers addressing essay writing needs in US secondary school instruction. Many of these papers come from educational research communities, and few use NLP technologies. Our review focuses more on human-computer interaction communities and leans more towards system that incorporate NLP technologies. When performing our literature review, we follow the checklist outlined in PRISMA 5 for performing a systematic literature review, including specifying inclusion / exclusion criteria and all sources searched.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 72,
"end": 94,
"text": "(Nicolau et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF28"
},
{
"start": 131,
"end": 149,
"text": "(Han et al., 2021)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
},
{
"start": 256,
"end": 276,
"text": "Strobl et al. (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF43"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Literature Reviews",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "3 Writing Goals Design Space Flower and Hayes (1981) describe writing in the following way:",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 29,
"end": 52,
"text": "Flower and Hayes (1981)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF8"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Literature Reviews",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "The act of composing itself is a goaldirected thinking process, guided by the writer's own growing network of goals.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Literature Reviews",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "These writing goals may be large, like to write up an experiment for an academic paper, or small, like to make a sentence sound more formal. They may be open-ended, like to come up with the name for a character, or quite limited, like to spell a word correctly. The goals may require imagining the reader, like to determine if a sentence is too confusing, or they may require diving deeper into what's already written, like to ensure a technical topic is discussed consistently throughout an article. Writing goals may start as external motivators-someone may ask one to write something-but as one writes, writing goals are created by the writer and propel the writing process forward.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Literature Reviews",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "We propose using this to structure a design space for writing support tools. Whether we call them support tools, assistants, co-creators or machinesin-the-loop, we believe what unites these systems is that they take on goals inherent in the writing process. We propose two axes for the design space:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Literature Reviews",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "1. Which part of the writing process the system aims to support. Flower and Hayes, in their original model of writing, propose three components: planning, translating, and reviewing. These three components align with models of creativity, which often cite ideation, implementation, and evaluation (Amabile, 1983) . In both cases the components are accessed iteratively, and often hierarchically. A writer may start with a high-level plan, and then in the act of 'translating' the plan may create a smaller plan within it. Splitting up writing support tools into these processes helps us understand how, when, and why a writer may use a tool.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 297,
"end": 312,
"text": "(Amabile, 1983)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Literature Reviews",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "We acknowledge that there can be some ambiguity in distinguishing between these processes. For instance, consider a tool that, upon request, completes a writer's sentence. This tool may be supporting translating, if the completion is intended to articulate what the writer already had in mind. Or it could be supporting planning, if the completion is intended to provide the writer with new ideas or directions for their writing. When annotating papers, we rely on how the researchers describe the tool, though we acknowledge the ambiguities involved in this and that writers may use a tool in unexpected or unintended ways. 6 2. The amount of constraint the goal has. A highly constrained goal has very few possible solutions, like when writing a technical definition. A lightly constrained goal has many possible solutions, like when describing a newly introduced fictional character. The amount of constraint gives Figure 2 : The writing goals design space is defined by the part of the writing process a tool wants to support and the level of constraint of the goal. This shows some example writing goals a tool may want to support. us a measure of how particular the support must be to achieve the goal. This may be considered a measure of difficulty-writing a technical definition is very constrained, and supporting this writing task requires a high level of world understanding from a system-but constraint doesn't always imply difficulty. A writing goal may be very constrained, for instance make a particular sentence more positive, but the support may be fairly straightforward, like providing a list of positive words. Figure 2 shows some hypothetical writing support tools in this design space, to better understand the space. Further details and descriptions of the design space can be found in the Appendix.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 625,
"end": 626,
"text": "6",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 918,
"end": 926,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1631,
"end": 1639,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Literature Reviews",
"sec_num": "2.3"
},
{
"text": "We perform a preliminary, systematic literature review such that we can plot tools in the design space. This validates the utility of the design space and provides insights into the landscape of writing support tools.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Methodology",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "We design a query for searching the ACM Digital Library for relevant papers. Our goal for this query is to find as many relevant papers as possible, while minimizing the number of irrelevant papers needed to sort through. This proved more difficult than expected because search terms like 'writing' and 'support' are quite common in other subfields, like those studying memory architecture. We iterated on a query that returned many of the papers we expected to be included (such as (Roemmele and Gordon, 2018a) and ), while also returning less than 300 results, such that we could visually inspect them all in a timely manner. We chose to only look at papers from the last five years as we wanted to focus on where the field is currently going. We didn't require an average yearly download or number of citations, as done in other systematic reviews like Frich et al. 2019, because we wanted to include very recent work that may not be well-distributed yet.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 483,
"end": 511,
"text": "(Roemmele and Gordon, 2018a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF36"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Designing a Search Query",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Our final query can be found in the Appendix. It resulted in 216 items.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Designing a Search Query",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "First we had one researcher read the titles of all papers and perform a quick 'desk reject' on any papers that were clearly off topic. 7 After this, 77 papers remained. Of these papers, two researchers read all the abstracts and noted if they thought a paper should be included based on the inclusion criteria below. They did this separately, and then came together to discuss and resolve disagreements.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Selecting Papers to Include in Review",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "Our inclusion criteria was:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Selecting Papers to Include in Review",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "1. a conference or journal publication 8",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Selecting Papers to Include in Review",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "2. a contribution that presents or studies a tool that aids in the translation of ideas into text",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Selecting Papers to Include in Review",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "We include additional examples of what would and would not be included (which the researchers used as guidelines) in the Appendix.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Selecting Papers to Include in Review",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "This resulted in 30 papers. A list of these papers can be found in the Appendix. Each paper was assigned a nickname which allowed for easier reference than the paper title or author list.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Selecting Papers to Include in Review",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "Three members of the research team participated in the annotations. The selected papers were split up, and each paper was annotated by a single researchers. Some of these annotations were to allow us to plot tools in the design space, others were to align with Frich et al. 2019, a systematic review of creativity support tools, and still others were to quantify the type of contribution. The full list of annotations, as well as details on how ambiguities in the annotations were resolved, can be found in the Appendix. The results of our annotations can be found at https://github.com/kgero/ writing-support-tools-2022.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotating the Selected Papers",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "In this section we consider how tools are distributed in the design space, which looks at the type of goal the tool supported, and how constrained that goal is. The 30 papers represented 33 systems, with some papers presenting multiple systems. 9 Three papers studied tools that supported all parts of the writing process: Writing Together studied Google Docs, Writing on Github (Pe-Than et al., 2018) studied GitHub, and Literary Style presented an early stage exploratory tool. We exclude these because it is difficult to locate them in a single part of the design space; future work may consider how tools can be distributed across multiple parts of the design space. Excluding these, we are left with 27 systems to analyze in this section. Figure 3 shows all tools in the writing goals design space. We color them by the size of the goal being supported. We see most parts of the design space covered, with tools in all three parts of the writing process and spanning many different levels of constraint. The papers also operate on all different sizes of writing goals. 10 The design space shows that planning and reviewing lack work on highly constrained support, suggesting an area for future work. As the constraint for the goal increases, tools tend to support narrower and more structured writing tasks. In planning, MiL (stories) and BunCho (Osone et al., 2021) (both constraint=1) support any kind of story writing, while MiL (slogans) and Metaphoria (Gero and Chilton, 2019b) (both constraint=4) support slogan and metaphor writing, which have rules and syntactic structures to guide the generation process. Reviewing similarly sees this move towards the niche as constraint increases. Textlets (Han et al., 2020 ) (constraint=1) is a general purpose reviewing tool based on a sophisticated usage of the 'find' command. In contrast, MepsBot (Peng et al., 2020 ) (constraint=4) focuses on comments in online mental health forums and Dajke (Schmidt, 2020) (constraint=5) is about adjusting the reading level of Tibetan learning material. Lightly constrained support for planning often relies on newer text generation technologies: MiL (stories) (con-straint=1) and MiL (slogans) (constraint=4) come from the same paper , but the lightly constrained work on stories relies on a neural network while the more constrained work on slogans relies on templates.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 1074,
"end": 1076,
"text": "10",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1707,
"end": 1724,
"text": "(Han et al., 2020",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
},
{
"start": 1853,
"end": 1871,
"text": "(Peng et al., 2020",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 744,
"end": 752,
"text": "Figure 3",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Writing Goals Design Space",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "Does a highly constrained writing goal need to be niche or highly structured? It may be that language technologies have not yet been capable of supporting more general purpose but still highly constrained writing goals. For instance, brainstorming often happens at multiple points throughout a creative process, with later brainstorming being more constrained by previous choices. Early stage brainstorming may be easier to support because there are less constraints needed to get right. An area new technologies could explore is laterstage brainstorming, which could be quite general purpose-input any piece of writing and a brainstorming prompt-but still lie in the highly constrained planning part of the design space.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Writing Goals Design Space",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "The design space shows that highly constrained support for translation is well studied; these systems tend to support highly structured writing tasks. AmbientLetter (Toyozaki and Watanabe, 2018) supports spell-checking while writing on paper; LyriSys generates topically relevant song lyrics based on a syllabic pattern; Play Write (Iqbal et al., 2018) supports writing microtasks; StoryAssembler (Garbe et al., 2019) supports writing dynamic / non-linear stories. Because the writing goals are quite diverse, these systems use a variety of technologies. Some are about providing text to the writer but most provide support in some other way, like structuring tasks or ensuring constraints are met.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Writing Goals Design Space",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "As in planning and reviewing, the translating tools for highly constrained goals are more highly structured. Likely this structure is what allows the tool to be supportive, or is developed by designers to provide traction for the problem. We also saw these tools being quite niche. More general writing tasks like storytelling (e.g. MiL (stories) , BunCho , and Writing with RNN (Roemmele and Gordon, 2018b)) were lightly constrained, but this isn't inherent to storytelling. Subtasks within storytelling can be quite constrained, but we didn't see them turn up in our literature review. An interesting Figure 3 : Twenty-seven writing support tools plotted in the writing goals design space. We can see that highly constrained planning and reviewing are under-explored areas. Figure 4 : There were more tools with 1-2 features (low complexity). The distribution of constraints being supported was U-shaped. example of highly constrained translation that we didn't see is taking bullet points and turning them into prose. This is another example of a highly constrained but more general purpose task we believe is an interesting area for future work.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 603,
"end": 611,
"text": "Figure 3",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 776,
"end": 784,
"text": "Figure 4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Writing Goals Design Space",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "The tools studied had various levels of technical complexity, drawing on a wide spectrum of user interactions and language technologies. They ranged from full document editors such as Microsoft Word and OmniFocus, which provide rich interface's on top of feedback such as spell checking, to collabo-ration software such as GitHub, to text generation technologies such as context-free grammars and neural algorithms. Figure 4 shows the distribution of tools according to complexity and level of constraint. For annotating the complexity of a tool we followed Frich et al. (2019) , where high complexity refers to an entire system or suite of tools, and low complexity refers to tools with only one or two features. (That is, complexity here is not a measure of technical difficulty.) The tools reviewed were slightly skewed towards low complexity (14 of the 33 tools). Most of the tools (78%) were contributions of the authors.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 558,
"end": 577,
"text": "Frich et al. (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 416,
"end": 424,
"text": "Figure 4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Complexity of Tool and Technology Used",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "A third (11 of 33) of the tools used a neural algorithm for text generation or translation and five used some other form of grammar, template, or external knowledge source for text generation. BunCho was one of the handful of non-English tools (5 of 33), using GPT-2 to generate Japanese story titles and summaries. Predictive text completion was used by a number of tools, like Storytelling Assistance (Roemmele and Gordon, 2018a) , to insert text in a way that might provoke the writer to explore new directions and see their work in a new light.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 403,
"end": 431,
"text": "(Roemmele and Gordon, 2018a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF36"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Complexity of Tool and Technology Used",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "A number of the tools were more highly constrained, providing some form of scaffold or guidance. Tools like IntroAssist use cognitive writing theories to produce static scaffolds that assist writers in their goals, in this case to write an intro email. Style Thesaurus (Gero and Chilton, 2019a) and Metaphoria (Gero and Chilton, 2019b) were among the more highly constrained tools that served as ideation support; the latter generating metaphors from input terms rather than producing sentence-level text.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 299,
"end": 335,
"text": "Metaphoria (Gero and Chilton, 2019b)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF64"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Complexity of Tool and Technology Used",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "A number of the tools were interested in analyzing and improving written text at various intermediate points in the writing process. Itero visualized document revision statistics to let writers get a better sense of their own interaction with their written words. AL used natural language processing to provide feedback on the quality of essays in terms of their argument structure, readableness, and coherence. Of these, some went the further step of correcting or altering the writer's text. SMWS (Wu et al., 2019) used the paradigm of neural text translation to 'translate' a Dyslexic writer's Facebook comments into non-Dyslexia style writing.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Complexity of Tool and Technology Used",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "The front-end user experience was primary to many of the tools. UI Design (Gon\u00e7alves and Campos, 2017) investigated how various interfaces promoted focus and other such writing considerations, and which led to increased writing quality. Liminal Triggers built an editor to investigate the effectiveness of subliminal priming to reduce writer's block. Textlets (Han et al., 2020) turned selected text into manipulable objects for intradocument organization. A few of the studies were interested in situating writing interfaces into alternative environments, such as a smartphone app for mixed-attention environments and game-text writing tool embedded right into the game engine .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 360,
"end": 378,
"text": "(Han et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Complexity of Tool and Technology Used",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "Many of the tools employed networking. Writing Together examined the collaborative effects of Google Docs, a full web-based writing interface with inline comments and tracked revision histories. IDS provided a mechanism to collaboratively turn summary writing into the form of a final document. A few of the studies explored how GitHub's pull/push workflow, which differs subtitantively from the live-editing affordances of Google Docs, can be used to improve writing quality. Heteroglossia expands the typical idea of collaboration with a system that had Mechanical Turkers roleplay for individual characters within a creative story. ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Complexity of Tool and Technology Used",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "A total of 33 evaluations were conducted among the 30 papers we studied. Several papers conducted more than one evaluation for their research, while three papers had no evaluation: Shakespeare , Dakje (Schmidt, 2020) , and Ambient Letter (Toyozaki and . Figure 5 shows the distributions of evaluation type and number of participants. On average, 25 participants were recruited for evaluation of writing tasks. 75% of the evaluations were conducted with fewer than 40 participants and these evaluations were either qualitative or mixed methods, likely because qualitative evaluations produce large and unorganized data that does not allow easy manipulation and analysis for too many participants. Writing Together and Storytelling Assistance (Roemmele and Gordon, 2018a) conducted studies with about 130 participants, and both were quantitative only evaluations.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 201,
"end": 216,
"text": "(Schmidt, 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF40"
},
{
"start": 741,
"end": 769,
"text": "(Roemmele and Gordon, 2018a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF36"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 254,
"end": 262,
"text": "Figure 5",
"ref_id": "FIGREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "Looking at the papers that had some component of qualitative evaluation, there was a wide range of criteria studied, including quality of writing, usability, usefulness, coherence to context, enjoyment, satisfaction, impact on flow, impact on confidence, and many more. Qualitative studies tended to assess their tools through semi-structured interviews with a small group of target users, such as creative writers or students. Around 50% of qualitative evaluations were done alongside a quantitative evaluation. Studies with only quantitative evaluations, such as Storytelling Assistance (Roemmele and Gordon, 2018a) , assessed quality of the tool with questionnaires reported on a Likert scale and used measures specific to the tools they are studying, like Levenshtein edit distance or simultaneous time spent on writing, to evaluate user's attitudes and collaborative usage of the tool.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 589,
"end": 617,
"text": "(Roemmele and Gordon, 2018a)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF36"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "Around half of the evaluations reported did not include the time participants spent writing with the system, which makes it difficult to assess this in relation to other aspects of the studies. Among the evaluations that reported time spent writing, quantitative evaluations done without the addition of a qualitative evaluation have a much shorter average time spent with the user (5-10 mins) than the others (25 mins). However, there's nothing inherent about quantitative or larger-scale evaluations that precludes writing for a longer period of time.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "Quality of writing corresponds to a variety of different task-specific measures. MiL (stories) has Amazon Mechanical Turk workers rate outputs for creativity, coherence, grammaticality, and entertainment. AL has annotators rate an argument according to a formal schema. Writing Together studied writing done during a project writing course; writing quality was determined by course graders.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "Given so much variety in the evaluation methodologies, we make several recommendations on how evaluations could become more comparable:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Report more details of the actual writing done in the study, for instance amount of time spent writing, amount of words written, and the type of participants recruited (novice, expert, etc.). \u2022 Use shared surveys rather than develop new ones each time. The Creativity Support Index (Cherry and Latulipe, 2014) , NASA Task Load Index (Hart and Staveland, 1988) , and Technology Acceptance Model (Venkatesh and Davis, 2000) may all be useful. We also encourage researchers to propose writingspecific surveys that can be used by others. \u2022 Report user interaction measures, like edit distance, and number and frequency of interactions, that can be shared across different writing tasks.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 284,
"end": 311,
"text": "(Cherry and Latulipe, 2014)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 335,
"end": 361,
"text": "(Hart and Staveland, 1988)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF18"
},
{
"start": 396,
"end": 423,
"text": "(Venkatesh and Davis, 2000)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF48"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "Perhaps the biggest barrier for comparing research is the lack of shared tasks. These papers represent a broad range of writing tasks, from slogan writing to dynamic storytelling to argumentative writing. While we do not believe that writing is a monolith, and nor should be writing support tools, a set of shared tasks may help consolidate the work.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "We suggest three shared writing tasks: story writing (fiction), argumentative essay writing (nonfiction), and personal essay writing (creative nonfiction). Personal essay writing has many elements of fiction, like relying on character and narrative, while being constrained to the reality of the writer's lived experience. These tasks span from being completely open-ended (story writing) to partially constrained (personal essay) to quite constrained (argumentative essays). Within each task are many subtasks which span from being very open-ended (how to start the argumentative essay) to very constrained (how to describe an existing character).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "We choose these tasks because they each contain goals which could span the entire design space and a variety of genres. There are many tasks we did not include, like emails, explainers, and poetry. These were not chosen because we felt they were too niche (like poetry) or too broad-reaching (like emails) to help unify research.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "Below we discuss some variation within each task, and some potential subtasks to focus on:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Story writing. This already-common task contains within it diverse goals from plot development to scene description. The length can vary its complexity and they can be constrained to varying degrees by a prompt. We recommend two specific tasks. The first is writing stories in response to a prompt. (Again, this is already common and can be continued to be worked on.) The second is adding detail to an existing or partially written story, for instance adding character or scene descriptions. This will allow work to look at some of the more constrained parts of story writing. \u2022 Argumentative essay writing. This task is common in U.S. secondary education and can be extended to include journalistic forms like opinion pieces. It contains subtasks like defending propositions, writing an engaging introduction, and appealing to the audience. We recommend two specific avenues of research: Supporting argumentative structure, and supporting introductory remarks. While supporting structure gets to complicated technical elements of the ideas of a piece of writing, supporting introductory remarks requires more modeling of the reader and understanding what makes text interesting and engaging.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Personal essay writing. This task can include private journaling as well as more public forms like memoir or even personal statements. It can contain subtasks like finding relevant historical information or identifying potential narratives. The utility of this task is how writers are self-motivated. For this task we recommend focusing less on the quality of writing, and more on the experience of the writer. While stories and argumentative essays have many formal elements that can be used in evaluation, we recommend this task be about immersion and self-expression.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Analysis of Evaluation Methodologies",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "Our systematic review was limited in scope, as we focused only on the last five years, and our query for selecting papers may not have caught all relevant papers. For instance, one clear problem with using the ACM Digital Library is that many NLP conferences are not included. Future work should investigate more sources for papers, and look further into the archive. Additionally, we did not include commercial or open source writing tools that exist outside of the academy, which likely would improve the findings of any large-scale, systematic review of writing support tools. There are also many more questions that could be asked about writing support tools. For instance, we found that user type was not widely reported, but user type may be implied by the writing task, or inferred by the evaluation methodology. Relatedly, further analysis could be done on how much work is dedicated to fiction v. nonfiction or short v. longer writing. We hope that by making our selected papers easily accessible, others may use this to do their own investigations with other focuses.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Limitations",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "We present a design space for writing support tools based on a cognitive process model of writing. We perform a systematic literature review, reviewing 30 papers from the last five years (2017-2021). We find that highly constrained planning and reviewing are under-studied areas. We see that evaluation methodologies vary widely, and propose validated surveys and interaction measures as ways to make evaluations more comparable across systems. We also propose three shared tasks-storytelling, argumentative writing, and personal essays-to aid in propelling work on writing support tools forward. The results of the query can be found at the following url: Below are examples of types of papers that would or would not be included. We used these examples when determining which papers would be included.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Some examples that would not be included: a general purpose productivity tool, where writing is an example use case; a study/analysis where the data analyzed is writing data; a study about writing-adjacent tools, like handwriting recognition; a tool that generates writing with little human interaction; a nonwriting tool with a language interface; language learning tools.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Some examples that would be included: a design fiction about a writing tool; a writing tool that has no evaluation; a writing tool that writes the first draft and then a human revises it; a study of a commercial writing tool; a tool that supports a very specific writing task; a tool that supports writing and something else (but is not a general purpose tool).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "We chose this inclusion criteria subjectively, to focus on our particular interest in writing support tools and their relation to improvements in language technology. We do not intend to present this inclusion criteria as an objective definition of writing support tools. For instance, handwriting recognition may be considered a writing support tool in some contexts, but would not fit our purposes. Another small group of papers we rejected were papers that supported the collection or organization of data that would later be written about, such as a tool for quickly extracting sports-game highlights for sportswriters, and another that solicited reflections throughout the day to support memoir writing. Journalists and others may consider these writing tools, but we excluded them on the rationale that they were somewhat disconnected from the final text produced. Table 1 shows all annotations done for the papers selected. Table 2 shows all 30 papers selected for this review, with brief descriptions and ordered by the year they were published.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 871,
"end": 878,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
},
{
"start": 931,
"end": 938,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "There was some ambiguity in the annotations. Some tools straddled multiple parts of the writing process, or the paper didn't frame the tool in a way that clearly defined the intention of the support. Systems that provided generated text were sometimes framed as providing ideas for the writer, and these labeled as supporting 'planning', whereas others that provided generated text were framed as actually writing, and these were labeled as supporting 'translating'. However, the distinction can be subtle, and sometimes, in a user study, participants used the tool in a different way than the designers intended. Some tools had a single main feature and many small 'satellite' features, making the level of complexity unclear. Our intention with these annotations is not to provide a perfectly objective representation but rather to understand the breadth and similarities within a field of study. When an annotator was unsure about an annotation, they consulted with the rest of the team.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "Some papers presented or studied more than one tool; others presented more than one evaluation for a single tool. In the case of multiple tools, we give each tool its own nickname and consider them separate entities. In the case of multiple evaluations, we consider them separate entities only when analyzing evaluation methodologies. (Multiple tools evaluated together are considered a single entity when analyzing evaluation methodologies.)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "How support aligns with the cognitive process model part of writing process plan / translate / review level of constraint 1: low constraint (almost anything could be helpful) 3: medium constraint (constrained but with variety in \"right\" answers) 5: high constraint (support must be very specific, few \"right\" answers) size of goal being support word / sentence / paragraph / more than paragraph / writing experience Matching creativity support tool review (Frich et al., 2019) complexity of tool low: one or two features medium: multiple features, semi-complex system high: entire system or suite of tools Some papers studied existing commercial writing tools, and others presented novel tools developed by the researchers. The commercial writing tools studied tended to be word processors, like Microsoft Word or Google Docs. We include all of these in our analysis.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 456,
"end": 476,
"text": "(Frich et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "Below are further details articulating the design space.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A.2 Design Space",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Plan: Support for ideation would be included in the planning portion of the design space, as would tools that aid in structuring writing. Some brainstorming support would be lightly constrained planning, for instance during early-stage story telling, whereas other brainstorming might be highly constrained, as in when writing about historical events or in an already-constructed story world.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A.2 Design Space",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Translate: We can place existing NLP tasks like automatic story generation and automatic summarization as supporting translation, where story generation tends to be only lightly constrained by a prompt and summarization is highly constrained by the document it is summarizing.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A.2 Design Space",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Review: A tool that provides the writer with feedback would support reviewing, as would one that involves revising what has already been written. A lightly constrained reviewing tool might provide generic or high-level feedback like \"what narrative structure are you using?\" whereas a highly constrained tool might provide feedback on specific word choice, stylistic patterning, or argument coherence.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "A.2 Design Space",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "For example, spell-checking was an early use of pointwise mutual information(Peterson, 1980), the exciting NLP technology of its time.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Hayes adds much more detail to the long-term memory component, and adds components for working memory and the motivation and affect of the writer(Hayes, 1996) 4 It can also be used to build computer systems to aid in the exploration.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://prisma-statement.org/ documents/PRISMA_2020_checklist.pdf",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "An alternate approach is to rely on how writers describe their usage, but given that many papers did not include this in their evaluation, we would not have been able to annotate all papers using this method.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "For example, a paper with the title 'A Tool for Visualizing Classic Concurrency Problems' was rejected for clearly being about a different topic.8 i.e. not a course description, workshop proceedings, etc.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "UI Design studied four systems, but since they were all very similar, for this section we consider them to be a single system (as they would be in the same part of the design space anyway).10 5 at the level of words, 6 at sentences, 8 at paragraphs, 3 at more than the paragraph, and 5 on the writing experience.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbot",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Daniel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Adiwardana",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Minh-Thang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Luong",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "David",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "So",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jamie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hall",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Noah",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fiedel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Romal",
"middle": [],
"last": "Thoppilan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Zi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Apoorv",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kulshreshtha",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gaurav",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nemade",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yifeng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "V",
"middle": [],
"last": "Quoc",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Le",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"arXiv": [
"arXiv:2001.09977"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Daniel Adiwardana, Minh-Thang Luong, David R. So, Jamie Hall, Noah Fiedel, Romal Thoppilan, Zi Yang, Apoorv Kulshreshtha, Gaurav Nemade, Yifeng Lu, and Quoc V. Le. 2020. Towards a Human-like Open-Domain Chatbot. arXiv:2001.09977 [cs, stat].",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Teresa M Amabile",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1983,
"venue": "Journal of personality and social psychology",
"volume": "45",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Teresa M Amabile. 1983. The social psychology of cre- ativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of personality and social psychology, 45(2):357.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "On the opportunities and risks of foundation models",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Rishi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bommasani",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Drew",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ehsan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hudson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Russ",
"middle": [],
"last": "Adeli",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Simran",
"middle": [],
"last": "Altman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Arora",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sydney Von Arx",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Michael",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jeannette",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bernstein",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Antoine",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bohg",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Emma",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bosselut",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Brunskill",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"arXiv": [
"arXiv:2108.07258"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Rishi Bommasani, Drew A Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosse- lut, Emma Brunskill, et al. 2021. On the opportuni- ties and risks of foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.07258.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Tom",
"middle": [
"B"
],
"last": "Brown",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Benjamin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Nick",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ryder",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Melanie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Subbiah",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jared",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kaplan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Prafulla",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dhariwal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Arvind",
"middle": [],
"last": "Neelakantan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pranav",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shyam",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Girish",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sastry",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Amanda",
"middle": [],
"last": "Askell",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sandhini",
"middle": [],
"last": "Agarwal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ariel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Herbert-Voss",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gretchen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Krueger",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tom",
"middle": [],
"last": "Henighan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Rewon",
"middle": [],
"last": "Child",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Aditya",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ramesh",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Daniel",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Ziegler",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jeffrey",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Clemens",
"middle": [],
"last": "Winter",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christopher",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hesse",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mark",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Eric",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sigler",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mateusz",
"middle": [],
"last": "Litwin",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"arXiv": [
"arXiv:2005.14165[cs].ArXiv:2005.14165"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Tom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah, Jared Kaplan, Prafulla Dhariwal, Arvind Neelakantan, Pranav Shyam, Girish Sastry, Amanda Askell, Sandhini Agarwal, Ariel Herbert-Voss, Gretchen Krueger, Tom Henighan, Rewon Child, Aditya Ramesh, Daniel M. Ziegler, Jeffrey Wu, Clemens Winter, Christopher Hesse, Mark Chen, Eric Sigler, Mateusz Litwin, Scott Gray, Benjamin Chess, Jack Clark, Christopher Berner, Sam McCandlish, Alec Radford, Ilya Sutskever, and Dario Amodei. 2020. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. arXiv:2005.14165 [cs]. ArXiv: 2005.14165.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "The cut-up method of brion gysin. The third mind",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "William",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Burroughs",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1961,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "29--33",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "William S Burroughs. 1961. The cut-up method of brion gysin. The third mind, pages 29-33.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "Quantifying the Creativity Support of Digital Tools through the Creativity Support Index",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Erin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cherry",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Celine",
"middle": [],
"last": "Latulipe",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction",
"volume": "21",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "1--25",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/2617588"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Erin Cherry and Celine Latulipe. 2014. Quantifying the Creativity Support of Digital Tools through the Creativity Support Index. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 21(4):1-25.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Creative writing with a machine in the loop: Case studies on slogans and stories",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Elizabeth",
"middle": [],
"last": "Clark",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Anne",
"middle": [
"Spencer"
],
"last": "Ross",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Chenhao",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yangfeng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ji",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Noah",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Smith",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '18",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "329--340",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3172944.3172983"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Elizabeth Clark, Anne Spencer Ross, Chenhao Tan, Yangfeng Ji, and Noah A. Smith. 2018. Creative writing with a machine in the loop: Case studies on slogans and stories. In 23rd International Confer- ence on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '18, page 329-340, New York, NY, USA. Association for Com- puting Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Writing as a Mode of Learning. College Composition and Communication",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Janet",
"middle": [],
"last": "Emig",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1977,
"venue": "",
"volume": "28",
"issue": "",
"pages": "122--128",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.2307/356095"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Janet Emig. 1977. Writing as a Mode of Learning. College Composition and Communication, 28(2):122- 128. Publisher: National Council of Teachers of English.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Linda",
"middle": [],
"last": "Flower",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "John",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Hayes",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1981,
"venue": "",
"volume": "32",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.2307/356600"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Linda Flower and John R. Hayes. 1981. A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4):365.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Mapping the Landscape of Creativity Support Tools in HCI",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jonas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Frich",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lindsay",
"middle": [
"Macdonald"
],
"last": "Vermeulen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Remy",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [
"Mose"
],
"last": "Biskjaer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Peter",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dalsgaard",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--18",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3290605.3300619"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jonas Frich, Lindsay MacDonald Vermeulen, Christian Remy, Michael Mose Biskjaer, and Peter Dalsgaard. 2019. Mapping the Landscape of Creativity Support Tools in HCI. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Con- ference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 1-18, Glasgow Scotland Uk. ACM.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Storyassembler: An engine for generating dynamic choice-driven narratives",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jacob",
"middle": [],
"last": "Garbe",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Max",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kreminski",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ben",
"middle": [],
"last": "Samuel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Noah",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wardrip-Fruin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mateas",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, FDG '19",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3337722.3337732"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jacob Garbe, Max Kreminski, Ben Samuel, Noah Wardrip-Fruin, and Michael Mateas. 2019. Sto- ryassembler: An engine for generating dynamic choice-driven narratives. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digi- tal Games, FDG '19, New York, NY, USA. Associa- tion for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "How a stylistic, machine-generated thesaurus impacts a writer's process",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Katy",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ilonka Gero",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lydia",
"middle": [
"B"
],
"last": "Chilton",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2019 on Creativity and Cognition, C&C '19",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "597--603",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3325480.3326573"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Katy Ilonka Gero and Lydia B. Chilton. 2019a. How a stylistic, machine-generated thesaurus impacts a writer's process. In Proceedings of the 2019 on Cre- ativity and Cognition, C&C '19, page 597-603, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machin- ery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "Metaphoria: An algorithmic companion for metaphor creation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Katy",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ilonka Gero",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lydia",
"middle": [
"B"
],
"last": "Chilton",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '19",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--12",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3290605.3300526"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Katy Ilonka Gero and Lydia B. Chilton. 2019b. Metaphoria: An algorithmic companion for metaphor creation. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Confer- ence on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '19, page 1-12, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "Understanding and evaluating the user interface design for creative writing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Frederica",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gon\u00e7alves",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pedro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Campos",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "85--92",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3121283.3121298"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Frederica Gon\u00e7alves and Pedro Campos. 2017. Under- standing and evaluating the user interface design for creative writing. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2017, ECCE 2017, page 85-92, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "What shall i write next? subliminal and supraliminal priming as triggers for creative writing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Frederica",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gon\u00e7alves",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Caraban",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Evangelos",
"middle": [],
"last": "Karapanos",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pedro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Campos",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "77--84",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3121283.3121294"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Frederica Gon\u00e7alves, Ana Caraban, Evangelos Kara- panos, and Pedro Campos. 2017. What shall i write next? subliminal and supraliminal priming as triggers for creative writing. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics 2017, ECCE 2017, page 77-84, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Ghost: A ghost story-writer",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Andrea",
"middle": [],
"last": "Guarneri",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Laura",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Ripamonti",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Francesco",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tissoni",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Marco",
"middle": [],
"last": "Trubian",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dario",
"middle": [],
"last": "Maggiorini",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Davide",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gadia",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter",
"volume": "17",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3125571.3125580"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Andrea Guarneri, Laura A. Ripamonti, Francesco Tis- soni, Marco Trubian, Dario Maggiorini, and Davide Gadia. 2017. Ghost: A ghost story-writer. In Pro- ceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter, CHItaly '17, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "Hybrid Paper-Digital Interfaces: A Systematic Literature Review",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Feng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Han",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yifei",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cheng",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Megan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Strachan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Xiaojuan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ma",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1087--1100",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3461778.3462059"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Feng Han, Yifei Cheng, Megan Strachan, and Xiaojuan Ma. 2021. Hybrid Paper-Digital Interfaces: A Sys- tematic Literature Review. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021, pages 1087-1100, Virtual Event USA. ACM.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Textlets: Supporting Constraints and Consistency in Text Documents",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Han",
"middle": [
"L"
],
"last": "Han",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Miguel",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Renom",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Wendy",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Mackay",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beaudouin-Lafon",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--13",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3313831.3376804"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Han L. Han, Miguel A. Renom, Wendy E. Mackay, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2020. Textlets: Supporting Constraints and Consistency in Text Documents, page 1-13. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Development of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research",
"authors": [
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sandra",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lowell",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Hart",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Staveland",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "Advances in psychology",
"volume": "52",
"issue": "",
"pages": "139--183",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sandra G Hart and Lowell E Staveland. 1988. Develop- ment of nasa-tlx (task load index): Results of empiri- cal and theoretical research. In Advances in psychol- ogy, volume 52, pages 139-183. Elsevier.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "John",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hayes",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1996,
"venue": "The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "John R. Hayes. 1996. A new framework for understand- ing cognition and affect in writing. In The Science of Writing: Theories, Methods, Individual Differences, and Applications. Lawrence Erbaum Associates.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "The Plot Genie",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Wycliffe Aber",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hill",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1931,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Wycliffe Aber Hill. 1931. The Plot Genie. EE Gagnon Company.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "Heteroglossia: In-Situ Story Ideation with the Crowd",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Chieh-Yang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Huang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Shih-Hong",
"middle": [],
"last": "Huang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ting-Hao Kenneth",
"middle": [],
"last": "Huang",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--12",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3313831.3376715"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Chieh-Yang Huang, Shih-Hong Huang, and Ting- Hao Kenneth Huang. 2020. Heteroglossia: In-Situ Story Ideation with the Crowd, page 1-12. Associa- tion for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "IntroAssist: A Tool to Support Writing Introductory Help Requests",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Julie",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Hui",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Darren",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gergle",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Elizabeth",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Gerber",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--13",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3173574.3173596"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Julie S. Hui, Darren Gergle, and Elizabeth M. Gerber. 2018. IntroAssist: A Tool to Support Writing Intro- ductory Help Requests, page 1-13. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "Multitasking with play write, a mobile microproductivity writing tool",
"authors": [
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shamsi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jaime",
"middle": [],
"last": "Iqbal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Teevan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Anne",
"middle": [
"Loomis"
],
"last": "Liebling",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Thompson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '18",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "411--422",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3242587.3242611"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Shamsi T. Iqbal, Jaime Teevan, Dan Liebling, and Anne Loomis Thompson. 2018. Multitasking with play write, a mobile microproductivity writing tool. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, UIST '18, page 411-422, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Enhancing story generation with the semantic web",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Eric",
"middle": [],
"last": "Labouve",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Erik",
"middle": [],
"last": "Miller",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Foaad",
"middle": [],
"last": "Khosmood",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, FDG '19",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3337722.3337742"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Eric LaBouve, Erik Miller, and Foaad Khosmood. 2019. Enhancing story generation with the semantic web. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, FDG '19, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machin- ery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "Cognitive learning: How to become william shakespeare",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Xiaotong",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Anbang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Xu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Zhe",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yufan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Guo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Rama",
"middle": [],
"last": "Akkiraju",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '19",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--6",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3290607.3312844"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Xiaotong Liu, Anbang Xu, Zhe Liu, Yufan Guo, and Rama Akkiraju. 2019. Cognitive learning: How to become william shakespeare. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '19, page 1-6, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machin- ery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Allan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Maclean",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Richard",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Young",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Victoria",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Thomas P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bellotti",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moran",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1996,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Allan MacLean, Richard M Young, Victoria M E Bel- lotti, and Thomas P Moran. 1996. Questions, Op- tions, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analy- sis. page 51.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "The computers are getting better at writing. The New Yorker",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Stephen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Marche",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Stephen Marche. 2021. The computers are getting better at writing. The New Yorker.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "The Design Space of Nonvisual Word Completion",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Hugo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nicolau",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andr\u00e9",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rodrigues",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andr\u00e9",
"middle": [],
"last": "Santos",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tiago",
"middle": [],
"last": "Guerreiro",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kyle",
"middle": [],
"last": "Montague",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jo\u00e3o",
"middle": [],
"last": "Guerreiro",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "249--261",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3308561.3353786"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hugo Nicolau, Andr\u00e9 Rodrigues, Andr\u00e9 Santos, Tiago Guerreiro, Kyle Montague, and Jo\u00e3o Guerreiro. 2019. The Design Space of Nonvisual Word Completion. In The 21st International ACM SIGACCESS Confer- ence on Computers and Accessibility, pages 249-261, Pittsburgh PA USA. ACM.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF29": {
"ref_id": "b29",
"title": "How people write together now: Beginning the investigation with advanced undergraduates in a project course",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Judith",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Olson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dakuo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gary",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Olson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jingwen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhang",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact",
"volume": "",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3038919"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Judith S. Olson, Dakuo Wang, Gary M. Olson, and Jing- wen Zhang. 2017. How people write together now: Beginning the investigation with advanced undergrad- uates in a project course. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact., 24(1).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF30": {
"ref_id": "b30",
"title": "BunCho: AI Supported Story Co-Creation via Unsupervised Multitask Learning to Increase Writers' Creativity in Japanese",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Hiroyuki",
"middle": [],
"last": "Osone",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jun-Li",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yoichi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ochiai",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3411763.3450391"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hiroyuki Osone, Jun-Li Lu, and Yoichi Ochiai. 2021. BunCho: AI Supported Story Co-Creation via Un- supervised Multitask Learning to Increase Writers' Creativity in Japanese. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF31": {
"ref_id": "b31",
"title": "Open collaborative writing: Investigation of the fork-and-pull model",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Laura",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ei Pa Pa Pe-Than",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "James",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dabbish",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Herbsleb",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact",
"volume": "5",
"issue": "CSCW1",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3449211"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ei Pa Pa Pe-Than, Laura Dabbish, and James Herbsleb. 2021. Open collaborative writing: Investigation of the fork-and-pull model. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 5(CSCW1).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF32": {
"ref_id": "b32",
"title": "Collaborative writing on github: A case study of a book project",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Laura",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ei Pa Pa Pe-Than",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "James",
"middle": [
"D"
],
"last": "Dabbish",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Herbsleb",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW '18",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "305--308",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3272973.3274083"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ei Pa Pa Pe-Than, Laura Dabbish, and James D. Herb- sleb. 2018. Collaborative writing on github: A case study of a book project. In Companion of the 2018 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Coopera- tive Work and Social Computing, CSCW '18, page 305-308, New York, NY, USA. Association for Com- puting Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF33": {
"ref_id": "b33",
"title": "Exploring the Effects of Technological Writing Assistance for Support Providers in Online Mental Health Community, page 1-15. Association for Computing Machinery",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Zhenhui",
"middle": [],
"last": "Peng",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Qingyu",
"middle": [],
"last": "Guo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ka",
"middle": [
"Wing"
],
"last": "Tsang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Xiaojuan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ma",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3313831.3376695"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Zhenhui Peng, Qingyu Guo, Ka Wing Tsang, and Xi- aojuan Ma. 2020. Exploring the Effects of Techno- logical Writing Assistance for Support Providers in Online Mental Health Community, page 1-15. As- sociation for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF34": {
"ref_id": "b34",
"title": "Computer programs for detecting and correcting spelling errors",
"authors": [
{
"first": "James",
"middle": [
"L"
],
"last": "Peterson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1980,
"venue": "Commun. ACM",
"volume": "23",
"issue": "12",
"pages": "676--687",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/359038.359041"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "James L. Peterson. 1980. Computer programs for detect- ing and correcting spelling errors. Commun. ACM, 23(12):676-687.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF35": {
"ref_id": "b35",
"title": "Open knowledge interface: A digital assistant to support students in writing academic assignments",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Olaf",
"middle": [],
"last": "Resch",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Aglika",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yankova",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Education through Advanced Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence",
"volume": "2019",
"issue": "",
"pages": "13--16",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3340435.3342723"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Olaf Resch and Aglika Yankova. 2019. Open knowl- edge interface: A digital assistant to support students in writing academic assignments. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGSOFT International Workshop on Education through Advanced Software Engineer- ing and Artificial Intelligence, EASEAI 2019, page 13-16, New York, NY, USA. Association for Com- puting Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF36": {
"ref_id": "b36",
"title": "Automated assistance for creative writing with an rnn language model",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Melissa",
"middle": [],
"last": "Roemmele",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Gordon",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion, IUI '18 Companion",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3180308.3180329"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Melissa Roemmele and Andrew S. Gordon. 2018a. Au- tomated assistance for creative writing with an rnn language model. In Proceedings of the 23rd Inter- national Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion, IUI '18 Companion, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF37": {
"ref_id": "b37",
"title": "Automated assistance for creative writing with an rnn language model",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Melissa",
"middle": [],
"last": "Roemmele",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [
"S"
],
"last": "Gordon",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion, IUI '18 Companion",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3180308.3180329"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Melissa Roemmele and Andrew S. Gordon. 2018b. Au- tomated assistance for creative writing with an rnn language model. In Proceedings of the 23rd Inter- national Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces Companion, IUI '18 Companion, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF38": {
"ref_id": "b38",
"title": "The design space of wireless sensor networks",
"authors": [
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Romer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "F",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mattern",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "IEEE Wireless Communications",
"volume": "11",
"issue": "6",
"pages": "54--61",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1109/MWC.2004.1368897"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "K. Romer and F. Mattern. 2004. The design space of wireless sensor networks. IEEE Wireless Communi- cations, 11(6):54-61.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF39": {
"ref_id": "b39",
"title": "Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Marlene",
"middle": [],
"last": "Scardamalia",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Carl",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bereiter",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1987,
"venue": "Advances in applied psycholinguistics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Marlene Scardamalia and Carl Bereiter. 1987. Knowl- edge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In Advances in applied psycholinguis- tics. Cambridge University Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF40": {
"ref_id": "b40",
"title": "Grading tibetan children's literature: A test case using the nlp readability tool \"dakje",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Dirk",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schmidt",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "ACM Trans. Asian Low-Resour. Lang. Inf. Process",
"volume": "19",
"issue": "6",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3392046"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dirk Schmidt. 2020. Grading tibetan children's litera- ture: A test case using the nlp readability tool \"dakje\". ACM Trans. Asian Low-Resour. Lang. Inf. Process., 19(6).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF41": {
"ref_id": "b41",
"title": "The next word: Where will predictive text take us? The New Yorker",
"authors": [
{
"first": "John",
"middle": [],
"last": "Seabrook",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "John Seabrook. 2019. The next word: Where will pre- dictive text take us? The New Yorker.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF42": {
"ref_id": "b42",
"title": "Interacting with Literary Style through Computational Tools",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Sarah",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sterman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Evey",
"middle": [],
"last": "Huang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Vivian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Eric",
"middle": [],
"last": "Paulos",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--12",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3313831.3376730"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sarah Sterman, Evey Huang, Vivian Liu, and Eric Pau- los. 2020. Interacting with Literary Style through Computational Tools, page 1-12. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF43": {
"ref_id": "b43",
"title": "Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Carola",
"middle": [],
"last": "Strobl",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Emilie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ailhaud",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kalliopi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Benetos",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ann",
"middle": [],
"last": "Devitt",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Otto",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kruse",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Antje",
"middle": [],
"last": "Proske",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rapp",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Computers & Education",
"volume": "131",
"issue": "",
"pages": "33--48",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.005"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Carola Strobl, Emilie Ailhaud, Kalliopi Benetos, Ann Devitt, Otto Kruse, Antje Proske, and Christian Rapp. 2019. Digital support for academic writing: A re- view of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education, 131:33-48.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF44": {
"ref_id": "b44",
"title": "Tarot-based narrative generation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Anne",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sullivan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mirjam Palosaari Eladhari",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cook",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--7",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Anne Sullivan, Mirjam Palosaari Eladhari, and Michael Cook. 2018. Tarot-based narrative generation. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games, pages 1-7.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF45": {
"ref_id": "b45",
"title": "A system for interleaving discussion and summarization in online collaboration",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Sunny",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tian",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Amy",
"middle": [
"X"
],
"last": "Zhang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "David",
"middle": [],
"last": "Karger",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact",
"volume": "",
"issue": "CSCW3",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3432940"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sunny Tian, Amy X. Zhang, and David Karger. 2021. A system for interleaving discussion and summarization in online collaboration. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact., 4(CSCW3).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF46": {
"ref_id": "b46",
"title": "Ambientletter: Letter presentation method for discreet notification of unknown spelling when handwriting",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Tomihiro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Xaver",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Keita",
"middle": [],
"last": "Toyozaki",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Watanabe",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Adjunct Proceedings, UIST '18 Adjunct",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "36--38",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3266037.3266093"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Xaver Tomihiro Toyozaki and Keita Watanabe. 2018. Ambientletter: Letter presentation method for dis- creet notification of unknown spelling when hand- writing. In The 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology Adjunct Pro- ceedings, UIST '18 Adjunct, page 36-38, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF47": {
"ref_id": "b47",
"title": "Itero: A revision history analytics tool for exploring writing behavior and reflection",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Selen",
"middle": [],
"last": "T\u00fcrkay",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Daniel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Seaton",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Ang",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '18",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--6",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3170427.3188474"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Selen T\u00fcrkay, Daniel Seaton, and Andrew M. Ang. 2018. Itero: A revision history analytics tool for exploring writing behavior and reflection. In Extended Ab- stracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Fac- tors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '18, page 1-6, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF48": {
"ref_id": "b48",
"title": "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Management",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Viswanath",
"middle": [],
"last": "Venkatesh",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fred",
"middle": [
"D"
],
"last": "Davis",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2000,
"venue": "Science",
"volume": "46",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "186--204",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Viswanath Venkatesh and Fred D. Davis. 2000. A The- oretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies. Manage- ment Science, 46(2):186-204.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF49": {
"ref_id": "b49",
"title": "AL: An Adaptive Learning Support System for Argumentation Skills",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Thiemo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wambsganss",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christina",
"middle": [],
"last": "Niklaus",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Matthias",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cetto",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Matthias",
"middle": [],
"last": "S\u00f6llner",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Siegfried",
"middle": [],
"last": "Handschuh",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jan",
"middle": [
"Marco"
],
"last": "Leimeister",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--14",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3313831.3376732"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Thiemo Wambsganss, Christina Niklaus, Matthias Cetto, Matthias S\u00f6llner, Siegfried Handschuh, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2020. AL: An Adaptive Learn- ing Support System for Argumentation Skills, page 1-14. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF50": {
"ref_id": "b50",
"title": "Mirroru: Scaffolding emotional reflection via in-situ assessment and interactive feedback",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Liuping",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Xiangmin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Feng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tian",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lingjia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Deng",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Shuai",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ma",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Huang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hongan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wang",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '18",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--6",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3170427.3188517"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Liuping Wang, Xiangmin Fan, Feng Tian, Lingjia Deng, Shuai Ma, Jin Huang, and Hongan Wang. 2018. Mir- roru: Scaffolding emotional reflection via in-situ as- sessment and interactive feedback. In Extended Ab- stracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Fac- tors in Computing Systems, CHI EA '18, page 1-6, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF51": {
"ref_id": "b51",
"title": "Lyrisys: An interactive support system for writing lyrics based on topic transition",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Kento",
"middle": [],
"last": "Watanabe",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yuichiroh",
"middle": [],
"last": "Matsubayashi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kentaro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Inui",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tomoyasu",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nakano",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Satoru",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fukayama",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Masataka",
"middle": [],
"last": "Goto",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '17",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "559--563",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/3025171.3025194"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Kento Watanabe, Yuichiroh Matsubayashi, Kentaro Inui, Tomoyasu Nakano, Satoru Fukayama, and Masataka Goto. 2017. Lyrisys: An interactive support system for writing lyrics based on topic transition. In Pro- ceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI '17, page 559-563, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF52": {
"ref_id": "b52",
"title": "Whither design space? Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design",
"authors": [
{
"first": "F",
"middle": [],
"last": "Robert",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [
"L"
],
"last": "Woodbury",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Burrow",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "Analysis and Manufacturing",
"volume": "20",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "63--82",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1017/S0890060406060057"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Robert F. Woodbury and Andrew L. Burrow. 2006. Whither design space? Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 20(2):63-82.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF53": {
"ref_id": "b53",
"title": "Presents a user study of four writing environments -Microsoft Word, Scrivener, OmniWriter and Ulysses. They found OmniWriter to be the most satisfying tool, and propose design guidelines for such tools, including full-screen mode for distraction-free writing",
"authors": [
{
"first": ";",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ui Design",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Campos",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gon\u00e7alves",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "UI Design (Gon\u00e7alves and Campos, 2017): Presents a user study of four writing environments -Microsoft Word, Scrivener, OmniWriter and Ulysses. They found OmniWriter to be the most satisfying tool, and propose design guidelines for such tools, including full-screen mode for distraction-free writing.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF54": {
"ref_id": "b54",
"title": "Reports on a lyric generation system, which generates full song lyrics according to strain and accent constraints, and provides plenty of user control including semantic topic transitions. Writing Together",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lyrisys",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Watanabe",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Studies data traces of collaborative writing in student teams' use of Google Docs. Liminal Triggers",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "LyriSys (Watanabe et al., 2017): Reports on a lyric generation system, which generates full song lyrics according to strain and accent constraints, and provides plenty of user control including semantic topic transitions. Writing Together (Olson et al., 2017): Studies data traces of collaborative writing in student teams' use of Google Docs. Liminal Triggers (Gon\u00e7alves et al., 2017): Investigates how subliminal triggering may help to relieve writer's block.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF55": {
"ref_id": "b55",
"title": "Presents a tool to support non-writers creating stories for video games. The resulting tool, GHOST, is built into Unity and aids in the creation of plot roadmaps. Writing with RNN (Roemmele and Gordon, 2018b): Presents Creative Help, an interface that suggests new sentences in a story using an RNN language model",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ghost (guarneri",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "GHOST (Guarneri et al., 2017): Presents a tool to support non-writers creating stories for video games. The resulting tool, GHOST, is built into Unity and aids in the creation of plot roadmaps. Writing with RNN (Roemmele and Gordon, 2018b): Presents Creative Help, an interface that suggests new sentences in a story using an RNN language model. Study varies the degree of randomness.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF56": {
"ref_id": "b56",
"title": "Presents and studies creative writing support tools: a next-sentence generator for story telling, and a slogan generator for writing slogans",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mil",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Clark",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "MiL (Clark et al., 2018): Presents and studies creative writing support tools: a next-sentence generator for story telling, and a slogan generator for writing slogans.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF57": {
"ref_id": "b57",
"title": "Proposes a technique to support writing activity (via autocorrection and predictive conversion) in a confidential manner with a pen-based device",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ambientletter",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Watanabe",
"middle": [],
"last": "Toyozaki",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "AmbientLetter (Toyozaki and Watanabe, 2018): Proposes a technique to support writing activity (via autocorrection and predictive conversion) in a confidential manner with a pen-based device.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF58": {
"ref_id": "b58",
"title": "Introduces a microproductivity tool that allows users to review and edit Word documents in small moments of spare time from their smartphone",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Play",
"middle": [],
"last": "Write",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": ";",
"middle": [],
"last": "Iqbal",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Play Write (Iqbal et al., 2018): Introduces a microproductivity tool that allows users to review and edit Word documents in small moments of spare time from their smartphone.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF59": {
"ref_id": "b59",
"title": "Presents a tool for supporting writing introductory help requests via email by providing checklists and examples",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Introassist",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hui",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "IntroAssist (Hui et al., 2018): Presents a tool for supporting writing introductory help requests via email by providing checklists and examples.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF60": {
"ref_id": "b60",
"title": "Presents a study on how integrating writing revision analytics and visualization into writing practices can impact writing self-efficacy",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Itero",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "T\u00fcrkay",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Itero (T\u00fcrkay et al., 2018): Presents a study on how integrating writing revision analytics and visualization into writing practices can impact writing self-efficacy.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF61": {
"ref_id": "b61",
"title": "Presents the preliminary findings of a mixed-methods, case study of collaboration practices in a GitHub book project",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pe-Than",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Writing on Github",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Writing on Github (Pe-Than et al., 2018): Presents the preliminary findings of a mixed-methods, case study of collaboration practices in a GitHub book project.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF62": {
"ref_id": "b62",
"title": "Presents a mixed initiative tool for story generation, designed to take as input a story generating grammar in addition to generic keywords and uses the semantic web to contribute real-world details",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mirroru",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wang",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "MirrorU (Wang et al., 2018): Presents a mobile system to support reflecting and writing about daily emotional experiences; provides assessment and feedback across level of detail, overall valence, and cognitive engagement. Semantic Web (LaBouve et al., 2019): Presents a mixed initiative tool for story generation, designed to take as input a story generating grammar in addition to generic keywords and uses the semantic web to contribute real-world details.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF63": {
"ref_id": "b63",
"title": "Presents a web application that helps with educating different writing styles through automatic style transfer (with deep learning), visual stylemotry analytics, and machine teaching (by picking out examples of a particular writing style). The authors propose a use case of this system",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shakespeare",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Shakespeare (Liu et al., 2019): Presents a web application that helps with educating different writing styles through automatic style transfer (with deep learning), visual stylemotry analytics, and machine teaching (by picking out examples of a particular writing style). The authors propose a use case of this system with Shakspeare's writings.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF64": {
"ref_id": "b64",
"title": "Presents a tool that shows how words might be metaphorically related",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Metaphoria",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Chilton",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gero",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Metaphoria (Gero and Chilton, 2019b): Presents a tool that shows how words might be metaphorically related.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF65": {
"ref_id": "b65",
"title": "Presents StoryAssembler, an open source generative narrative system that creates dynamic choice-driven narratives, and a case study",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Storyassembler",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Garbe",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "StoryAssembler (Garbe et al., 2019): Presents StoryAssembler, an open source generative narrative system that creates dynamic choice-driven narratives, and a case study.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF66": {
"ref_id": "b66",
"title": "This paper describes a tool built by the Facebook researchers to automatically 'translate' text written by people with dyslexia to non-dyslexic style writing. Having built the tool into the Facebook comment interfcae",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Smws (wu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "SMWS (Wu et al., 2019): This paper describes a tool built by the Facebook researchers to automatically 'translate' text written by people with dyslexia to non-dyslexic style writing. Having built the tool into the Facebook comment interfcae, they conduct a week long study to measure its efficacy.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF67": {
"ref_id": "b67",
"title": "Presents OKI, a chatbot tool that helps with project management, assistance in applying scientifc methods, and search in open access literature. Style Thesaurus (Gero and Chilton, 2019a): Presents a series of automatically generated thesauruses",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Yankova",
"middle": [],
"last": "Resch",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Academic Writing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Academic Writing (Resch and Yankova, 2019): Presents OKI, a chatbot tool that helps with project management, assistance in applying scientifc methods, and search in open access literature. Style Thesaurus (Gero and Chilton, 2019a): Presents a series of automatically generated thesauruses, using word embeddings trained on custom corpuses, which reflect the stylistic preferences of the corpus text.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF68": {
"ref_id": "b68",
"title": "This paper presents an NLP tool to aid student argumentative writing by providing automatic feedback on their argumentation structure",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Al (wambsganss",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "AL (Wambsganss et al., 2020): This paper presents an NLP tool to aid student argumentative writing by providing automatic feedback on their argumentation structure.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF69": {
"ref_id": "b69",
"title": "Introduces a new readability tool alongside a specific use case, and demonstrates how it can help benefit literacy in the Tibetan languages. Users have instant access to statistics on the readability of their word choices so they can make edits for easy",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dakje",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dakje (Schmidt, 2020): Introduces a new readability tool alongside a specific use case, and demonstrates how it can help benefit literacy in the Tibetan languages. Users have instant access to statistics on the readability of their word choices so they can make edits for easy-to-read text.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF70": {
"ref_id": "b70",
"title": "Presents a crowd-sourcing tool that allows writer to elicit story ideas based on a role-play strategy",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Heteroglossia",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Huang",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Heteroglossia (Huang et al., 2020): Presents a crowd-sourcing tool that allows writer to elicit story ideas based on a role-play strategy. The tool is developed as Google Doc add-on.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF71": {
"ref_id": "b71",
"title": "Introduces Textlets, interactive objects that reify text selections into persistent items, and show how Textlets can be used for selective search and replace",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Textlets",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Han",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Textlets (Han et al., 2020): Introduces Textlets, interactive objects that reify text selections into persistent items, and show how Textlets can be used for selective search and replace, word count, and alternative wording.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF72": {
"ref_id": "b72",
"title": "2020): Presents in-situ writing assistance for people commenting in online mental health communities",
"authors": [
{
"first": "(",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mepsbot",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Peng",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "MepsBot (Peng et al., 2020): Presents in-situ writing assistance for people commenting in online mental health communities; compares support that assesses text versus recommends text.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF73": {
"ref_id": "b73",
"title": "Develops a model of style by training a neural net, and present novel applications including an interactive text editor with real-time style feedback",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Literary",
"middle": [],
"last": "Style",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": ";",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sterman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Literary Style (Sterman et al., 2020): Develops a model of style by training a neural net, and present novel applications including an interactive text editor with real-time style feedback.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF74": {
"ref_id": "b74",
"title": "Investigates the utility of the GitHub \"fork and pull\" workflow for writers through a mixed-methods case study of collaborative writing. They looked at two collaborative writing cases, the first to write a mathematics textbook on homotopy type theory, and the second a set of open source public policies",
"authors": [
{
"first": ";",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fork-And-Pull",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pe-Than",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Fork-and-Pull (Pe-Than et al., 2021): Investigates the utility of the GitHub \"fork and pull\" workflow for writers through a mixed-methods case study of collaborative writing. They looked at two collaborative writing cases, the first to write a mathematics textbook on homotopy type theory, and the second a set of open source public policies.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF75": {
"ref_id": "b75",
"title": "Presents Wikum+, a website that allows you to create instances of interleaved discussion and summarization",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tian",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "IDS System (Tian et al., 2021): Presents Wikum+, a website that allows you to create instances of interleaved discussion and summarization.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF76": {
"ref_id": "b76",
"title": "Presents a tool for generating titles and synopses from keywords. Additionally, an interactive story co-creation AI system is proposed",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Buncho (osone",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2021,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "BunCho (Osone et al., 2021): Presents a tool for generating titles and synopses from keywords. Additionally, an interactive story co-creation AI system is proposed. (Japanese language)",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF77": {
"ref_id": "b77",
"title": "Table 2: List of all 30 papers, ordered by the year their were published, with short description of contribution",
"authors": [],
"year": null,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Table 2: List of all 30 papers, ordered by the year their were published, with short description of contribution.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"num": null,
"text": "The cognitive process model for writing, as proposed by",
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure"
},
"FIGREF1": {
"num": null,
"text": "Histograms representing the distribution of evaluation methodologies.",
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure"
},
"TABREF0": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>A Appendix</td></tr><tr><td>A.1 Methodology</td></tr><tr><td>The query we searched for searching the ACM</td></tr><tr><td>Digital Library was:</td></tr><tr><td>[[Abstract: writing] OR [Abstract: writer]] AND</td></tr><tr><td>[[Abstract: interface] OR [Abstract: system] OR [Abstract: prototype] OR [Abstract: tool]] AND</td></tr><tr><td>[[Abstract: assistant] OR [Abstract: support] OR [Abstract: tool]] AND</td></tr><tr><td>[Publication Date: (01/01/2017 TO 12/31/2021)] AND</td></tr><tr><td>[CCS 2012: Human-centered computing]</td></tr></table>",
"text": "Shaomei Wu, Lindsay Reynolds, Xian Li, and Francisco Guzm\u00e1n. 2019. Design and evaluation of a social media writing support tool for people with dyslexia. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI '19, page 1-14, New York, NY, USA. Association for Computing Machinery.",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"html": null
},
"TABREF2": {
"content": "<table/>",
"text": "List of all annotations done for the papers. Most annotations have options, while some are open response.",
"type_str": "table",
"num": null,
"html": null
}
}
}
} |