File size: 100,223 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 |
{
"paper_id": "I11-1020",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T07:31:20.497656Z"
},
"title": "Improving Related Entity Finding via Incorporating Homepages and Recognizing Fine-grained Entities",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Youzheng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wu",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "youzheng.wu@nict.go.jp"
},
{
"first": "Chiori",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hori",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "chiori.hori@nict.go.jp"
},
{
"first": "Hisashi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kawai",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "hisashi.kawai@nict.go.jp"
},
{
"first": "Hideki",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kashioka",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": "hideki.kashioka@nict.go.jp"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "This paper describes experiments on the TREC entity track that studies retrieval of homepages representing entities relevant to a query. Many studies have focused on extracting entities that match the given coarse-grained types such as organizations, persons, locations by using a named entity recognizer, and employing language model techniques to calculate similarities between query and supporting snippets of entities from which entities are extracted to rank the entities. This paper proposes three improvements over baseline, i.e., 1) incorporating homepages of entities to supplement supporting snippets, 2) recognizing fine-grained named entities to filter out or negatively reward extracted entities that do not match the specified fine-grained types of entities such as a university, airline, author, and 3) adopting a dependency tree-based similarity method to improve language model techniques. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed approaches can significantly improve performance, for instance, the absolute improvements of nDCG@R and P@1 scores are 8.4%, and 27.5%.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "I11-1020",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "This paper describes experiments on the TREC entity track that studies retrieval of homepages representing entities relevant to a query. Many studies have focused on extracting entities that match the given coarse-grained types such as organizations, persons, locations by using a named entity recognizer, and employing language model techniques to calculate similarities between query and supporting snippets of entities from which entities are extracted to rank the entities. This paper proposes three improvements over baseline, i.e., 1) incorporating homepages of entities to supplement supporting snippets, 2) recognizing fine-grained named entities to filter out or negatively reward extracted entities that do not match the specified fine-grained types of entities such as a university, airline, author, and 3) adopting a dependency tree-based similarity method to improve language model techniques. Our experiments demonstrate that the proposed approaches can significantly improve performance, for instance, the absolute improvements of nDCG@R and P@1 scores are 8.4%, and 27.5%.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Many user information needs would be better answered by presenting a ranked list of entities directly, instead of just a list of relevant documents. Based on this assumption, increasing attention has been devoted to related entity finding tasks that aimed at finding documents representing entities of a correct type that are relevant to a query. The TREC expert finding track (Nick, 2005) , for example, focused on creating an ordered list of experts who have skills and experiments on a given topic. The INEX entity ranking task (Vries, 2007) studied at ranking Wikipedia entities given a query, in which target entity types are shifted from a single type of entity (person) to any Wikipedia category. The TREC related entity finding (REF) track (Balog, 2010) started in 2009, is defined as: Given an input entity, by its name and homepage, the type of the target entity 1 , as well as the nature of their relation, described in free text, find related entities that are of a target type, standing in the required relation to the input entity. The REF task is also similar to a combination of the TREC list QA (Voorhees, 2003) and homepage finding (Hawking, 2001 ) tasks. In short, all these entity finding tasks generally aim at performing entity-oriented search tasks on the Web. This paper is concerned with the TREC REF track. Figure 1 shows an example of this. <query> <num>7</num> <entity_name>Boeing 747</entity_name> <entity_URL>clueweb09-en0005-75-02292</entity_URL> <target_entity>organization</target_entity> <narrative>Airlines that currently use Boeing 747 planes.</narrative> </query> The key challenge in the REF task involves entity ranking, that is, estimating the likelihood of the extracted entities being answer entities for a given query. Many related studies ) have employed language model techniques to estimate the likelihoods of the extracted entities being answer entities via calculating similarities between query and supporting documents/snippets of entities. This technique may fail in cases where supporting documents/snippets of entities do not support their being answer entities.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 377,
"end": 389,
"text": "(Nick, 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 531,
"end": 544,
"text": "(Vries, 2007)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1112,
"end": 1128,
"text": "(Voorhees, 2003)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 1150,
"end": 1164,
"text": "(Hawking, 2001",
"ref_id": "BIBREF6"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 1333,
"end": 1341,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "To improve the above approach, this paper first argues that candidate entities' homepages are important supplements to supporting snippets and should be effectively exploited. Homepage information is, however, ignored by many TREC participants' systems. Second, much of the work to date only extracts coarse-grained types of entities (such as people, organizations, locations and products specified in target entity field as shown in Figure 1 ) by using entity repositories such as YAGO (Suchanek, 2007) or named entity recognizers (Ratinov, 2009) , and then rank them. However, some queries specify fine-grained types of target entities in narrative fields, such as airlines in Figure 1 . In these cases, fine-grained entity recognition is necessary and helpful for improving performance, which can recognize fine-grained named entities such as airlines, publishers, drivers, or newspapers. Third, a dependency tree-based similarity approach is implemented to substitute language model techniques, which proved superior to the latter.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 487,
"end": 503,
"text": "(Suchanek, 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
},
{
"start": 532,
"end": 547,
"text": "(Ratinov, 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF18"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 434,
"end": 442,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
},
{
"start": 679,
"end": 687,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "The contributions of this paper include 1) incorporating homepages of entities, and 2) recognizing fine-grained types of entities for improving entity ranking. Furthermore, we propose an unsupervised method of generating training examples for fine-grained entity recognition and exploit multiple-contexts of entities as classification features. In related studies, only single-contexts of entities are employed. The experimental results in terms of the TREC 2010 entity track test data set demonstrate that the nDCG@R improvements of our three proposals, i.e., dependency-tree similarity, incorporating homepage and recognizing fine-grained named entity components, are 2.3%, 4.1%, and 2.1%, respectively. Compared with baseline, the accumulative improvements of our REF system in terms of nDCG@R, P@1 and P@5 scores are 8.4%, 27.5%, and 12.0%, respectively.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "The TREC REF task is highly related to a combination of the TREC list QA and homepage finding, INEX entity ranking, and TREC expert search tasks. The TREC list QA task (2001) (2002) (2003) (2004) (2005) (2006) (2007) (Voorhees, 2003) required systems to assemble an unordered list of answer strings to factoid questions such as Who are six actors who have played Tevye in \"Fiddler on the Roof\"? The underlying information need is of a more informational nature. However, the REF task is situated in explorative search tasks. Moreover, the list QA task also does not require returning to the homepage for each answer string. In recent years, retrievalbased (Yang, 2003) , pattern-based (Ravichandran, 2002) , deep NLP-based (Moldovan, 2002; Harabagiu, 2003) , and supervised/unsupervised machine learning based approaches (Ittycheriah, 2002; Wu, 2007) have been proposed. The TREC homepage finding task (2001) (2002) (2003) assumes that incoming queries (like \"IJCNLP 2011\") are attempts to navigate to the homepage of a particular web site (http://www.ijcnlp2011.org/). The TREC expert search task ( ) (Nick, 2005 focused on creating an ordered list of experts who have skills and experiments on a specific topic with enterprise data. Most of the proposed approaches generally fall into two categories: generative language models and discriminative models. For example, Balog (2006) proposed profile-centric (directly models the knowledge of an expert from associated documents) and document-centric (locates documents on the topic and then finds the associated experts) generative language models (LMs). Cao (2005) proposed a two-stage language model consisting of a document relevance and co-occurrence model. There are many other generative probabilistic models such as (Fang, 2007; Serdyukov, 2008) . proposed a principled relevance-based discriminative model that integrates a variety of document evidence and document candidate association features for improving expert searching. The INEX entity ranking task (2007-2010) (Vries, 2007) studies ranking of Wikipedia entities to a query topic. Apart from estimating similarities between Wikipedia pages and the given query topic, many systems (Pehcevski, 2008) have exploited Wikipedia link structure and Wikipedia categories, for instance, estimating overlap between the set of categories associated with target Wikipedia pages and the categories specified in a given query topic.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 168,
"end": 174,
"text": "(2001)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 175,
"end": 181,
"text": "(2002)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 182,
"end": 188,
"text": "(2003)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 189,
"end": 195,
"text": "(2004)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 196,
"end": 202,
"text": "(2005)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 203,
"end": 209,
"text": "(2006)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 210,
"end": 216,
"text": "(2007)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 217,
"end": 233,
"text": "(Voorhees, 2003)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 656,
"end": 668,
"text": "(Yang, 2003)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
},
{
"start": 685,
"end": 705,
"text": "(Ravichandran, 2002)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 723,
"end": 739,
"text": "(Moldovan, 2002;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 740,
"end": 756,
"text": "Harabagiu, 2003)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF29"
},
{
"start": 821,
"end": 840,
"text": "(Ittycheriah, 2002;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
},
{
"start": 841,
"end": 850,
"text": "Wu, 2007)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF34"
},
{
"start": 902,
"end": 908,
"text": "(2001)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 909,
"end": 915,
"text": "(2002)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 916,
"end": 922,
"text": "(2003)",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1098,
"end": 1113,
"text": "( ) (Nick, 2005",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 1370,
"end": 1382,
"text": "Balog (2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
},
{
"start": 1605,
"end": 1615,
"text": "Cao (2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF36"
},
{
"start": 1773,
"end": 1785,
"text": "(Fang, 2007;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 1786,
"end": 1802,
"text": "Serdyukov, 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
},
{
"start": 2197,
"end": 2214,
"text": "(Pehcevski, 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF15"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "The TREC REF task (2009 aims at entity-oriented search on the Web. The most typical system is a cascade of the following components. (1) Document Retriever retrieves top relevant documents to a given query from the given Clueweb09 collection with 503 million English pages. (2) Entity Extractor extracts candidate entities that match the given target types from the top relevant documents by using entity repositories such as Wikipedia, or using named entity recognizers.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 4,
"end": 23,
"text": "TREC REF task (2009",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "(3) Entity Ranker estimates the probabilities of the extracted entities being answer entities by using supporting documents and/or snippets in which entities and queries co-occur. A number of language modeling techniques borrowed from expert search systems were employed Li, 2010) . 4Homepage Finder assigns primary homepages for the top ranked entity names by using entity names as queries, or homepage identifiers. Table 1 compares these tasks from four aspects.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 271,
"end": 280,
"text": "Li, 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 417,
"end": 424,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "We can see that TREC entity ranking task is very complicated, and each component is an independent research topic in the fields of NLP and IR. This paper cannot cover all of them, and only focuses on Entity Ranker component, that is, given a query Q, and a list of extracted entities E = {e i |i = 1, 2, ...n} associated with their homepages H = {h e i |i = 1, 2, ..., n}, how to effectively rank these entities. The other three components are beyond the scope of this paper. For better understanding of the REF system, we simply introduce them. Our Document Retriever first employs Yahoo! BOSS API 2 to search relevant pages from the Web and then map them to documents in Clueweb09. Since one lesson from TREC 2009 is that commercial search engines such as Yahoo! are generally superior in locating relevant documents for the search engine, we used the Indri tool for building. In Entity Extractor, an NER tool developed at UIUC (Ratinov, 2009) 3 is employed. In particular, phrases/words tagged with PER, ORG, LOC and MISC tags are extracted when the target entities are people, organizations, locations, and products, respectively. For Homepage Finder, the DBpedia homepage data 4 is used to train a binary classifier and features are similar to (Upstill, 2003) . It is noted that we reverse the sequence of the Entity Ranker and Homepage Finder to enable incorporating homepage for ranking (introduced in section 3.3), that is, we first assign homepage for each entity, and then rank them.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 930,
"end": 945,
"text": "(Ratinov, 2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF18"
},
{
"start": 1249,
"end": 1264,
"text": "(Upstill, 2003)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF31"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Our System",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "In the context of expert search, the task is to find out what is the probability of a candidate person being an expert to a query. The REF system can be simply regarded as the task of estimating p(e i |Q), the probability of an entity e i being answer entity given a query Q. Therefore, approaches proposed in expert search can be used for entity finding. In TREC expert search, document model (referred as Model 2) (Balog, 2006) turned out to be one of the most prominent and effective models for estimating p(e i |Q). Model 2 is also used as our baseline, which can be expressed by,",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 416,
"end": 429,
"text": "(Balog, 2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Baseline",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "p(e i |Q) \u221d n j=1 p(Q|es ij ) * p(e i |es ij , Q) (1)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Baseline",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "In (1) es ij stands for the j-th supporting snippet from which entity e i is extracted, n is the number of supporting snippets, p(Q|es ij ) denotes the relevance between query and supporting snippet, and can be relatively easy to determine using a language model (the KL-divergence language model used in this paper), p(e i |es ij , Q) denotes the cooccurrence of the query and entity in the snippet. Because unique characteristics of the W3C corpus used in expert search, meta-based co-occurrence model is commonly used. In entity ranking task, the KL-divergence language model is adopted to calculate p(e i |es ij , Q). Model 2 can be further improved in the context of REF task as follows.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Baseline",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "To improve unigram KL-divergence language model that can not capture relations between query words, this paper adopts a dependency tree-based similarity algorithm to calculate p(Q|es ij ), which can be expressed by,",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 1: Dependency Tree-based Similarity",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "EQUATION",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 8,
"text": "EQUATION",
"ref_id": "EQREF",
"raw_str": "p(Q|es ij ) \u221d DP Q \u2229 DP es ij |DP Q | \u00d7 |DP es ij |",
"eq_num": "(2)"
}
],
"section": "Improvement 1: Dependency Tree-based Similarity",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "where DP Q and DP es ij stand for a set of sub-trees generated from dependency trees of query Q and text snippet es ij , respectively. Dependency trees are obtained by parsing Q and es ij using Lin's dependency parser, Minipar 5 , and the subtree is defined as any node up to its two descendants and extracted with the Freqt toolkit 6 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 1: Dependency Tree-based Similarity",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "The goal of the REF task is to return homepages representing entities to a query, and homepages sometimes contain valuable information for ranking. Therefore, it is easy and necessary to incorporate homepages of entities in ranking. As input in entity finding, we receive a query Q, a list of candidate entities E = {e i |i = 1, 2, ..., n} associated with their homepages H = {h e i |i = 1, 2, ..., n}. The Entity Ranker can be reformulated to estimate a conditional probability p(e i , h e i |Q). The top k entities with their homepages are deemed the most probable answer entities. By assuming entity e i is independent of its homepage h e i , we obtain,",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 2: Incorporating Homepage",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "EQUATION",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 8,
"text": "EQUATION",
"ref_id": "EQREF",
"raw_str": "p(e i , h e i |Q) = p(e i |Q) \u00d7 p(h e i |Q)",
"eq_num": "(3)"
}
],
"section": "Improvement 2: Incorporating Homepage",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "where p(e i |Q) stands for the probability of entity e i being an answer given query Q, and can be calculated using Equation (1) and (2), p(h e i |Q) stands for the probability of homepage h e i being an answer given query Q. By applying the Bayes' Theorem and assuming that p(h e i ) is uniform for all homepages h e i , we obtain,",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 2: Incorporating Homepage",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "p(h e i |Q) = p(Q|h e i ) \u00d7 p(h e i ) p(Q) \u221d p(Q|h e i )",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 2: Incorporating Homepage",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "(4) In some cases, homepages such as that of racecar driver Michael Schumacher (http://www. michael-schumacher.de/) do not contain any valuable information but intend to greet visitors and provide information about the site or its owner. Thus, we retrieve text snippets hs e i from a homepage site using query Q to build a back-off model for p(h e i |Q) built from the homepage (the opening or main page of the homepage site). Finally, we can obtain,",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 2: Incorporating Homepage",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "p(Q|h e i ) = \u03b1 \u00d7 p(Q|h e i ) + \u03b2 \u00d7 p(Q|hs e i ) (5)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 2: Incorporating Homepage",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "where \u03b1 + \u03b2 = 1, p(Q|h e i ) and p(Q|hs e i ) are estimated using the KL-divergence language model.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 2: Incorporating Homepage",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "In short, conditional probability p(e i , h e i |Q) of the likelihood of entity e i with its homepage h e i being answer is calculated by using Equation 3, (5), (1) and (2).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 2: Incorporating Homepage",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "As mentioned, entities are extracted by using NER tool. There exist two problems. First, the NER tool can only identify coarse-grained types of entities such as organizations or locations. However, users' queries sometimes specify finegrained types of named entities such as airlines, universities, or actresses. Second, many incorrect entities are extracted. The main reason lies in: the NER tool is trained on newspapers, but we use it to tag web data. Therefore, it is necessary to filter out or negatively reward entities that do not match the fine-grained entity types if specified in queries. For example, this step can hopefully remove or negatively reward the extracted entities that are not airlines for the TREC 2009 test query shown in Figure 1 . Many semi-supervised methods have been proposed to recognize fine-grained types of entities. For example, Hearst (1992) used lexical patterns such as \"X, such as Y\". Fleischman (2002) employed a supervised learning method that considered the local context surrounding the entity as well as global semantic information. Etzioni (2005) started with a set of \"predicates\" and bootstrapped the extraction process from highprecision generic patterns. Oh (2009) exploited Wikipedia structure information and textual context to determine fine-grained types of Wikipedia entities. Generally, these methods mainly exploit the single-context of an entity as classification feature, which may result in errors in cases in which the relation between entity and its fine-grained type is not explicitly expressed.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 864,
"end": 877,
"text": "Hearst (1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
},
{
"start": 924,
"end": 941,
"text": "Fleischman (2002)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF22"
},
{
"start": 1077,
"end": 1091,
"text": "Etzioni (2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
},
{
"start": 1204,
"end": 1213,
"text": "Oh (2009)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 747,
"end": 755,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": "FIGREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 3: Fine-grained Entity Recognition",
"sec_num": "3.4"
},
{
"text": "Our proposal differs: 1) we utilize multiple contexts in which entities and their fine-grained types co-occur, 2) multiple contexts obtained by querying the Web with entities and their fine-grained types are helpful to disambiguate entities, 3) a dependency pattern-based approach is proposed for fine-grained classification of named entities. More specifically, our goal is to assign a class label (\"yes\" or \"no\") for each entity, fine-grained type pair. A \"yes\" means the entity belongs to the corresponding fine-grained type. Otherwise, it does not. The details are as follows.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Improvement 3: Fine-grained Entity Recognition",
"sec_num": "3.4"
},
{
"text": "A certain number of entity e, its fine-grained type f gt, multi-contexts they co-occur mc training triples are needed to build a classifier of finegrained entities. The key challenge here is to prepare positive and negative e, f gt pairs. A Wikipedia article usually starts with a definition sentence like \"Continental Airlines is an American airline based and headquartered in Continental Center I in downtown Houston, Texas.\" We find that it is practicable to automatically extract entity (\"Continental Airlines\" in this example) and its fine-grained type (\"airline\") from such well-formed sentences. To extract the pairs from these definition sentences, we first use Minipar to parse all Wikipedia definition sentences and then extract the pairs using heuristic rules such as (be (Wikipedia-entity) (fine-grained-type)). In this example, Continental Airlines, airline is extracted. Finally, 41,495 pairs are generated. These pairs will be used as positive instances. In order to construct negative training pairs, we first adopt the NER tool to recognize named entities in the Wikipedia definition sentences, and then pair the fine-grained type and the identified entities, except for the Wikipedia entity, as negative examples. For example, Continental Center I, airline , Houston, airline , and Texas, airline pairs are generated. Finally, 122,686 negative pairs are collected from Wikipedia.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Step-1: Preparation of Training Examples",
"sec_num": "3.4.1"
},
{
"text": "Multi-context mc can be easily obtained by querying a search engine with the entity and its type and merging the first k snippets returned. Formally, mc = k j=1 s j , where s j denotes the j-th snippet. For ambiguous entities such as \"Michael Collins\", it is hard to recognize their fine-grained types with fewer frequencies from multiple contexts obtained by querying the Web with entities only. Multiple contexts learned with entities and their fine-grained types can partially solve this problem.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Step-1: Preparation of Training Examples",
"sec_num": "3.4.1"
},
{
"text": "In order to handle long distance relations between words, dependency patterns are extracted as features for classification. First, textual contexts of e, f gt, mc triples are parsed using Lin's Minipar. Then, the shortest dependency paths between e and f gt are extracted as dependency patterns. Figure 2 shows two examples. To reduce the di- mensionality of the feature space, we calculate the precision of each dependency pattern by using the equation,",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 296,
"end": 304,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": "FIGREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Step-2: Building Classifier",
"sec_num": "3.4.2"
},
{
"text": "precison = Cnt p /(Cnt p + Cnt n ),",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Step-2: Building Classifier",
"sec_num": "3.4.2"
},
{
"text": "where, Cnt p and Cnt n denote total numbers of patterns occurring in positive and negative triples, respectively. We sort the extracted dependency patterns in deceasing order of precision and empirically select the top 500 patterns as classification features. For the classifier, we employ multivariate classification SVMs that can directly optimize a large class of performance measures such as F 1 -Score, prec@k and rec@k (the precision and recall of a classifier that predicts exactly k = 100 examples to be positive) (Joachims, 2005) . For our experiment we held out 500 pairs from each of the positive and negative instances for testing. The remainder are used for training. Table 2 reports the results on the testing data. These results are quite promising. The classifier optimizing F 1 -Score is finally used in our REF system. from the narrative field of query Q according to the predefined heuristic rules such as the head of the first non-stop noun phrase being fine-grained. For exmaple, gallery in \"What art galleries are located in Bethesda, Maryland?\" is identified as fine-grained type. For each entity e i extracted via the Entity Extractor, the following steps are performed. (1) obtain textual contexts by querying the Yahoo! search engine with entity e i and the identified finegrained type f gt Q , and merging the Yahoo! snippets returned. (2) parse contexts using Lin's Minipar and extract dependency patterns between e i and f gt Q . (3) employ the classifier to determine whether the entity e i belongs to the fine-grained type f gt Q , and remove or negatively reward the entities that are not fine-grained type identified from the query.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 522,
"end": 538,
"text": "(Joachims, 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 681,
"end": 688,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Step-2: Building Classifier",
"sec_num": "3.4.2"
},
{
"text": "Our experiments are conducted in the context of the TREC 2010 REF task. Relevance judgements in the TREC were performed in two stages. In phase one, all participant systems were pooled to a depth of the 20. The submitted homepages were judged on a three-point relevance scale: (2) primary homepage devoted to and in control of the entity, (1) relevant homepage devoted to the entity, but is not in control of the entity, and (0) nonrelevant homepage that only mentions the entity but is not about the entity. Note that the Wikipedia page of a given entity is regarded as non-relevant by definition in TREC 2010. In phase two, homepages belonging to the same entity are grouped together. The test set used in the TREC 2010 entity track contains 50 test queries. In the official evaluation, only 47 test queries are used because no answers to the other three queries are found. Among 47 test queries, 31 are for organization, 7 for location, 8 for person, and 1 for product name. The average number of answered homepages per topic is 14 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiments",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "The TREC metrics are based on the homepages only because the ultimate goal of the REF system is to find the homepages of the entities. The main metric is nDCG@R; that is, the normalized discounted cumulative gain at rank R (the number of primary and relevant homepages for that topic) where a record with a primary gets a gain of 3, and a record with a relevant gets a gain of 1. We also report P@N, that is, the fraction of primary homepages in the first N ranks. Experimental results are computed using the eval-entity.pl script released by TREC. Table 3 reports the results of the four runs. Best T and Median T denote the best and median scores among all TREC 2010 participants' systems, respectively. Perfect O means the manual ranking system, which can indicate the performance ceiling that our Entity Ranker can achieve. Our comb denotes the proposed system that negatively reward all entities not belonging to the fine-grained entity type by simply putting them at the end of the ranking list.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 549,
"end": 556,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Experiments",
"sec_num": "4"
},
{
"text": "nDCG@R P@1 P@5 P@10 Our comb .1865",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Overall Performance",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": ". .38 --- Table 3 : Comparison of four runs.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 10,
"end": 17,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Overall Performance",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "The results demonstrate that: i) Our comb significantly improves the median performance of the TREC participant systems from 12% to 18.65% in terms of nDCG@R. However, Perfect O (the performance ceiling) is much high than our automatic system, Our comb . This means that there is still much room for improving the entity ranking component. ii) Figure 3 shows the performance of each target type. Product-type queries achieve a worse score due to poor product (PRO) name recognition of the NER tool. The best P@1 score is obtained for organization (ORG) type queries. The nDCG@R score for the person (PER) type is, however, better than that for ORG-type queries. This is because the average number of answer homepages for the ORG-type (29.5) is significantly larger that that of the PERtype (10.5), and the recall for ORG type queries is relatively poor. iii) The Best T (Yang, 2010) is even better than our Perfect O . This indicates that the recall of our entity extraction is unsatisfactory. Note that this paper is mainly concerned with entity ranking, and entity extraction is not the scope of this paper. Yet the proposed methods can be incorporated into Best T and it can be expected to further improve its performance. Because Best T only use co-occurrence information between entities in ranking. For better understanding, Table 4 analyzes the recalls of the answer entities in the Document Retriever and Entity Extractor modules. #que represents the number of queries in which at least one answer entity is contained. #ent represents the number of answer entities of all test queries contained. This table indicates that the recall of the Entity Extractor is only 37% (= 266/715). The following sections mainly analyze the impacts of the dependency tree-based similarity, incorporating homepage and the fine-grained entity recognition to the REF system; thus, we exclude the queries for which no answer entities are extracted in the Entity Extractor, and the following experiments are based on 40 queries of the TREC 2010 test set.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 870,
"end": 882,
"text": "(Yang, 2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF27"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 344,
"end": 352,
"text": "Figure 3",
"ref_id": "FIGREF2"
},
{
"start": 1331,
"end": 1338,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": "TABREF5"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Overall Performance",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "Entity Recognition Table 5 shows the contributions of the dependency tree-based similarity (DTBS), incorporating homepage information (HP), and fine-grained named entity recognition (FG-NER). The baseline is Model 2 discussed in section 3.1. Significance tests are conducted. \u2020 : significantly better than the system without this component at the p = 0.05 level using two-sided t-tests; : significantly better at the 0.01 level.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 19,
"end": 26,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Impact of Homepage and Fine-grained",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "nDCG@R P@1 P@5 P@10 Table 5 : Contribution of each component.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 20,
"end": 27,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Impact of Homepage and Fine-grained",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "The experimental results indicate that: i) the DTBS method can greatly improve Baseline, e.g., the nDCG@R and P@1 scores are significantly improved by 16.9% and 100.0%, respectively. We expect this because the DTBS method considers the relation between words. ii) homepage (HP) can positively impact the REF system in terms of nDCG@R, P@5, and P@10 metrics, which, however, leads to a lower P@1 score. When a nonhomepage but one highly-related to the query is assigned as the homepage of an incorrect entity, incorporating homepage information will cause a negative influence. iii) the FG-NER can greatly improve the P@1 score from 20.0% to 40.0% and the P@10 score by 7.1% (not significant). This indicates that the FG-NER on TREC answer entities has nice precision and but poor recall. Table 2 , however, shows that our FG-NER can achieve promising precision and recall. It is hard for TREC non-famous entities to retrieve snippets from the Web that conform to the dependency patterns extracted from snippets of Wikipedia entities, which results in poor performance.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 788,
"end": 795,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Impact of Homepage and Fine-grained",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "In short, it is effective to use a dependency tree-based similarity, homepage information, and fine-grained named entity recognition in the REF system. Figure 4 shows the nDCG@R scores of Our comb and Baseline for each of the 40 queries.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 152,
"end": 160,
"text": "Figure 4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Impact of Homepage and Fine-grained",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "The experiments above are based on homepages only in which correct entities with wrong homepages are not rewarded. This section discusses the performance based on named entities in which failures of finding homepage are ignored. In calculating nDCG@R, each answer entity gains 1 and a Figure 4 : nDCG@R score for each test query.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 285,
"end": 293,
"text": "Figure 4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation on Entity Names",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "non-relevant entity gains 0. Figure 5 shows the performance. This figure indicates that the improvements from each proposed component are more significant when errors from homepage finding are ignored. For example, the absolute enhancements of the FG-NER in terms of P@1 and nDCG@R scores are 22.5%, and 3.1%, respectively. This experiment indicates that the Homepage Finder component needs to be improved.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 29,
"end": 37,
"text": "Figure 5",
"ref_id": "FIGREF4"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation on Entity Names",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "P@1 P@5 P@10 nDCG@R ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evaluation on Entity Names",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "This paper focused on developing a model for retrieving homepages of entities relevant to a query from a huge collection, and proposed three algorithms for improvements: a dependency treebased similarity method, incorporating homepages of entities to supplement text snippets that the entities are from, and fine-grained classification of named entities. The comparison experiments on the TREC 2010 test data set showed that the proposed algorithms can significantly improve the system; e.g., the cumulative improvements of the nDCG@R, P@1, and P@5 scores over the Baseline reach 8.4%, 27.5%, and 12.0%, respectively. Moreover, our approaches can also be used in other tasks such as factoid QA. For example, in the TREC 2007 QA test set, about 50% questions (except for questions which answers are numeric and time expresses) contain fine-grained types of answers. Thus, our fine-grained entity recognition module can be expected to lead to improvements in QA systems.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "In the future, we will work toward entity extraction and fine-grained named entity recognition. Table and list-based entity extraction may be essential due to the considerable number of answer entities scattered in tables, lists, and other structured forms. For example, answer entities to TREC 2010 query 29 (Find companies that are included in the Dow Jones industrial average.) are contained in a table at http://www.1728. com/dowjone2.htm. Li (2010) summarized the statistics of the TREC 2010 test queries in which answer entities are expressed in tables and lists. This means the NER tool trained by the newspaper corpus might fail at identifying the entities from tables and lists, and we have a great deal of work to do in order to correctly identify them. For fine-grained named entity recognition, more studies are needed on identifying finegrained types of non-famous entities. For example, it is hard to determine whether \"Rosenberg Gallery\" is a gallery from the snippets relevant to the query \"Rosenberg Gallery, gallery\".",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 444,
"end": 453,
"text": "Li (2010)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 96,
"end": 105,
"text": "Table and",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "TREC 2010 limits the track's scope to searches for instances of the organizations, people, locations and product entity types.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://developer.yahoo.com/ 3 http://l2r.cs.uiuc.edu/\u02dccogcomp",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://dbpedia.org/About",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://webdocs.cs.ualberta.ca/\u02dclindek 6 http://chasen.org/\u02dctaku/software",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "A Noisy-Channel Approach to Question Answering",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Abdessamad",
"middle": [],
"last": "Echihabi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Daniel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Marcu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "Proc. of ACL 2003",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Abdessamad Echihabi and Daniel Marcu. 2003. A Noisy-Channel Approach to Question Answering. In Proc. of ACL 2003, Japan.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "IBM's Statistical Question Answering System-TREC 11",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Abraham",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ittycheriah",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Salim",
"middle": [],
"last": "Roukos",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2002,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Abraham Ittycheriah, and Salim Roukos. 2002. IBM's Statistical Question Answering System-TREC 11. In Proc. of TREC 2002.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Entity Ranking Track",
"authors": [],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proc. of INEX",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Entity Ranking Track. In Proc. of INEX 2007.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Fine-Grained Classification of Named Entities Exploiting Latent Semantic Kernels",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Claudio",
"middle": [],
"last": "Giuliano",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Proc. of CoNLL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "201--209",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Claudio Giuliano. 2009. Fine-Grained Classification of Named Entities Exploiting Latent Semantic Ker- nels. In Proc. of CoNLL 2009, pp. 201-209.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "LCC Tools for Question Answering",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Dan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moldovan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sanda",
"middle": [],
"last": "Harabagiu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roxana",
"middle": [],
"last": "Girju",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2002,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dan Moldovan, Sanda Harabagiu, Roxana Girju, et al. 2002. LCC Tools for Question Answering. In Proc. of TREC 2002.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Overview of the TREC 2001 Web Track",
"authors": [
{
"first": "David",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hawking",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Nick",
"middle": [],
"last": "Craswell",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "David Hawking, and Nick Craswell. 2001. Overview of the TREC 2001 Web Track. In Proc. of TREC 2001.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Learning Surface Text Patterns for a Question Answering System",
"authors": [],
"year": 2002,
"venue": "Proc. of ACL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Learning Surface Text Patterns for a Question An- swering System. In Proc. of ACL 2002.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Overview of the TREC 2003 Question Answering Track",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ellen",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Voorhees",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC 2003",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "54--68",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ellen M. Voorhees. 2003. Overview of the TREC 2003 Question Answering Track. In Proc. of TREC 2003, pp.54-68, USA.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "YAGO: A Core of Semantic Knowledge Unifying WordNet and Wikipedia",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Fabian",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Suchanek",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gjergji",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kasneci",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gerhard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Weikum",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proc. of WWW",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "697--706",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Fabian M. Suchanek, Gjergji Kasneci, and Gerhard Weikum. 2007. YAGO: A Core of Semantic Knowl- edge Unifying WordNet and Wikipedia. In Proc. of WWW 2007, pp.697-706.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Probabilistic Models for Expert Finding",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Hui",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Chengxiang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhai",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proc. of ECIR",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "418--430",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hui Fang and ChengXiang Zhai. 2007. Probabilistic Models for Expert Finding. In Proc. of ECIR 2007, pp.418-430.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "QUALIFIER: Question Answering by Lexical Fabric and External Resources",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Hui",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tat-Seng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chua",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "Proc. of EACL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "363--370",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hui Yang, and Tat-Seng Chua. 2003. QUALIFIER: Question Answering by Lexical Fabric and External Resources. In Proc. of EACL 2003, pp.363-370.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "Document Language Models, Query Models, and Risk Minimization for Information Retrieval",
"authors": [
{
"first": "John",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lafferty",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Chengxiang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhai",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "Proc. of SIGIR",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "John Lafferty and Chengxiang Zhai. 2001. Docu- ment Language Models, Query Models, and Risk Minimization for Information Retrieval. In Proc. of SIGIR-2001.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Bilingual Co-Training for Monolingual Hyponymy-Relation Acquisition",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jong-Hoon",
"middle": [],
"last": "Oh",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kiyotaka",
"middle": [],
"last": "Uchimoto",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kentaro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Torisawa",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Proc. of ACL 2010",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "432--440",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jong-Hoon Oh, Kiyotaka Uchimoto, and Kentaro Tori- sawa. 2009. Bilingual Co-Training for Monolingual Hyponymy-Relation Acquisition. In Proc. of ACL 2010, pp.432-440.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Exploiting Locality of Wikipedia Links in Entity Ranking",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jovan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pehcevski",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Anne-Marie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Vercoustre",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "James",
"middle": [],
"last": "Thom",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Proc. of ECIR",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jovan Pehcevski, Anne-Marie Vercoustre, and James Thom. 2008. Exploiting Locality of Wikipedia Links in Entity Ranking. In Proc. of ECIR 2008.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "Formal Models for Expert Finding in Enterprise Corpora",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Krisztian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Balog",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Leif",
"middle": [],
"last": "Azzopardi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Maarten",
"middle": [],
"last": "De Rijke",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "Proc. of SIGIR",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "43--50",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Krisztian Balog, Leif Azzopardi, and Maarten de Rijke. 2006. Formal Models for Expert Finding in Enter- prise Corpora. In Proc. of SIGIR 2006, pp.43-50.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Overview of TREC 2010 Entity Track",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Krisztian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Balog",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Leif",
"middle": [],
"last": "Azzopardi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Maarten",
"middle": [],
"last": "De Rijke",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Krisztian Balog, Leif Azzopardi, and Maarten de Rijke. 2010. Overview of TREC 2010 Entity Track. In Proc. of TREC 2010.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Design Challenges and Misconceptions in Named Entity Recognition",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Lev",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ratinov",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Roth",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Proc. of CoNLL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Lev Ratinov and Dan Roth. 2009. Design Challenges and Misconceptions in Named Entity Recognition. In Proc. of CoNLL 2009.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "Ranking Related Entities: Components and Analysis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Marc",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bron",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Krisztian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Balog",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Maarten",
"middle": [],
"last": "De Rijke",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proc. of CIKM",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Marc Bron, Krisztian Balog, and Maarten de Rijke. 2010. Ranking Related Entities: Components and Analysis. In Proc. of CIKM 2010.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "The University of Amsterdam at TREC 2010 Session, Entity, and Relevance Feedback",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Marc",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bron",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jiyin",
"middle": [],
"last": "He",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Katja",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hofmann",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Marc Bron, Jiyin He, Katja Hofmann, et al. 2010. The University of Amsterdam at TREC 2010 Session, Entity, and Relevance Feedback. In Proc. of TREC 2010.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Marti",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Hearst",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1992,
"venue": "Proc. of COLING-92",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "539--545",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Marti A. Hearst. 1992. Automatic Acquisition of Hyponyms from Large Text Corpora. In Proc. of COLING-92, pp.539-545.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "Fine Grained Classification of Named Entities",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fleischman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Eduard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hovy",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2002,
"venue": "Proc. of COLING-2002",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Michael Fleischman and Eduard Hovy. 2002. Fine Grained Classification of Named Entities. In Proc. of COLING-2002.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "Overview of the TREC-2005 Enterprise Track",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Nick",
"middle": [],
"last": "Craswell",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Arjen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ian",
"middle": [],
"last": "De Vries",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Soboroff",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC 2005",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--7",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Nick Craswell, Arjen P. de Vries, and Ian Soboroff. 2005. Overview of the TREC-2005 Enterprise Track. In Proc. of TREC 2005, pp.1-7.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Unsupervised Named-Entity Extraction from the Web: An Experimental Study",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Oren",
"middle": [],
"last": "Etzioni",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michael",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cafarella",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Doug",
"middle": [],
"last": "Downey",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Artificial Intelligence",
"volume": "165",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Oren Etzioni, Michael Cafarella, Doug Downey, et al. 2005. Unsupervised Named-Entity Extraction from the Web: An Experimental Study. Artificial Intelli- gence, Volume 165 Issue 1.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "Modeling multi-step relevance propagation for expert finding",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Pavel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Serdyukov",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Djoerd",
"middle": [],
"last": "Henning Rode",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hiemstra",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Proc. of CIKM",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Pavel Serdyukov, Henning Rode, and Djoerd Hiemstra. 2008. Modeling multi-step relevance propagation for expert finding. In Proc. of CIKM 2008.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "Searching for Entities: When Retrieval Meets Extraction",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Qi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Daqing",
"middle": [],
"last": "He",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Qi Li and Daqing He. 2010. Searching for Entities: When Retrieval Meets Extraction. In Proc. of TREC 2010.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "Reconstruct Logical Hierarchical Sitemap for Related Entity Finding",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Qing",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Peng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jiang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Chunxia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhang",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Qing Yang, Peng Jiang, Chunxia Zhang, and et al. 2010. Reconstruct Logical Hierarchical Sitemap for Related Entity Finding. In Proc. of TREC 2010.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "Entity Ranking using Wikipedia as a Pivot",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Rianne",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kaptein",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pavel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Serdyukov",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proc. of CIKM",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Rianne Kaptein, Pavel Serdyukov, Arjen de Vries, and Jaap Kamps. 2010. Entity Ranking using Wikipedia as a Pivot. In Proc. of CIKM 2010.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF29": {
"ref_id": "b29",
"title": "Open-Domain Textual Question Answering Techniques",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Sanda",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Harabagiu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Steven",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Maiorano",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Marius",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Pasca",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "In Natural Language Engineering",
"volume": "9",
"issue": "3",
"pages": "1--38",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Sanda M. Harabagiu, Steven J. Maiorano and Marius A. Pasca. 2003. Open-Domain Textual Question Answering Techniques. In Natural Language Engi- neering 9 (3): 1-38.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF30": {
"ref_id": "b30",
"title": "A Support Vector Method for Multivariate Performance Measures",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Thorsten",
"middle": [],
"last": "Joachims",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proc. of ICML",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Thorsten Joachims. 2005. A Support Vector Method for Multivariate Performance Measures. In Proc. of ICML 2005.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF31": {
"ref_id": "b31",
"title": "Query-Independent Evidence in Home Page Finding",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Trystan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Upstill",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol21, No3",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "286--313",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Trystan Upstill. 2003. Query-Independent Evidence in Home Page Finding. In ACM Transactions on Information Systems, Vol21, No3, pp.286-313.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF32": {
"ref_id": "b32",
"title": "Discriminative Models of Integrating Document Evidence and Document-Candidate Associations for Expert Search",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Yi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Luo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Si",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Aditya",
"middle": [
"P"
],
"last": "Mathur",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proc. of SIGIR 2010",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "683--690",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Yi Fang, Luo Si, and Aditya P. Mathur. 2010. Discrim- inative Models of Integrating Document Evidence and Document-Candidate Associations for Expert Search. In Proc. of SIGIR 2010, pp.683-690.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF33": {
"ref_id": "b33",
"title": "Purdue at TREC 2010 Entity Track: A Probabilistic Framework for Matching Types Between Candidate and Target Entities",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Yi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Luo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Si",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Zhengtao",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Yi Fang, Luo Si, Zhengtao Yu, et al. 2010. Purdue at TREC 2010 Entity Track: A Probabilistic Frame- work for Matching Types Between Candidate and Target Entities. In Proc. of TREC 2010.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF34": {
"ref_id": "b34",
"title": "Learning Unsupervised SVM Classifier for Answer Selection in Web Question Answering",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Youzheng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ruiqiang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Xinhui",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hideki",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kashioka",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2007,
"venue": "Proc. of EMNLP-CoNLL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Youzheng Wu, Ruiqiang Zhang, Xinhui Hu, Hideki Kashioka. 2007. Learning Unsupervised SVM Classifier for Answer Selection in Web Question Answering. In Proc. of EMNLP-CoNLL 2007.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF35": {
"ref_id": "b35",
"title": "NiCT at TREC 2009: Employing Three Models for Entity Ranking Track",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Youzheng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hideki",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kashioka",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Youzheng Wu and Hideki Kashioka. 2009. NiCT at TREC 2009: Employing Three Models for Entity Ranking Track. In Proc. of TREC 2009.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF36": {
"ref_id": "b36",
"title": "Research on expert search at enterprise track of TREC",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Yunbo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jingjing",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Shenghua",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proc. of TREC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Yunbo Cao, Jingjing Liu, Shenghua Bao, and Hang Li. 2005. Research on expert search at enterprise track of TREC 2005. In Proc. of TREC 2005.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF37": {
"ref_id": "b37",
"title": "Question Answering as Question-Biased Term Extraction: A New Approach toward Multilingual QA",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Yutaka",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sasaki",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proc. of ACL",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Yutaka Sasaki. 2005. Question Answering as Question-Biased Term Extraction: A New Approach toward Multilingual QA. In Proc. of ACL 2005.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure",
"text": "Test query in TREC 2009 entity track."
},
"FIGREF1": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure",
"text": "Entity) (Fine-grained Type)) (known (Entity) (as (Fine-grained Type))) Examples of dependency patterns."
},
"FIGREF2": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure",
"text": "Results per topic type."
},
"FIGREF4": {
"num": null,
"uris": null,
"type_str": "figure",
"text": "Metrics based on named entities."
},
"TABREF1": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>: Comparison of entity ranking tasks. W3C corpus is a simulation of enterprise data crawled from</td></tr><tr><td>public W3C (*.w3.org) sites in June 2004.</td></tr></table>",
"num": null,
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"text": ""
},
"TABREF2": {
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td colspan=\"3\">Rec@k Prec@k F1-score</td></tr><tr><td>Precision</td><td>80.8</td><td>89.3</td><td>86.4</td></tr><tr><td>Recall</td><td>97.4</td><td>83.6</td><td>91.6</td></tr><tr><td>F-measure</td><td>88.3</td><td>86.4</td><td>88.9</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Table 2: Fine-grained named entity classifiers op-</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">timizing different measures.</td><td/><td/></tr></table>",
"num": null,
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"text": "To use the classifier in the REF system, we recognize fine-grained type f gt Q of the target entity"
},
"TABREF4": {
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td>Golden Answers a</td><td>Document Retriever b</td><td>Entity Extractor c</td></tr><tr><td>#que</td><td>47</td><td>45</td><td>40</td></tr><tr><td>#ent</td><td>715</td><td>384</td><td>266</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\">a Golden answers are proved by TREC 2010</td><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">http://trec.nist.gov/data/entity10.html</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">No answer entities are extracted for queries 28, 36, 37, 65, and 66.</td></tr></table>",
"num": null,
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"text": "No answer entities are retrieved for queries 34 and 44."
},
"TABREF5": {
"content": "<table/>",
"num": null,
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"text": "Recalls of answer entities."
}
}
}
} |