File size: 103,853 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 |
{
"paper_id": "I08-1044",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T07:42:31.079932Z"
},
"title": "A Framework Based on Graphical Models with Logic for Chinese Named Entity Recognition *",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Xiaofeng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yu",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "Information Systems Laboratory",
"institution": "The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin",
"location": {
"settlement": "Hong Kong",
"region": "N.T"
}
},
"email": "xfyu@se.cuhk.edu.hk"
},
{
"first": "Wai",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lam",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "Information Systems Laboratory",
"institution": "The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin",
"location": {
"settlement": "Hong Kong",
"region": "N.T"
}
},
"email": "wlam@se.cuhk.edu.hk"
},
{
"first": "Shing-Kit",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chan",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "Information Systems Laboratory",
"institution": "The Chinese University of Hong Kong Shatin",
"location": {
"settlement": "Hong Kong",
"region": "N.T"
}
},
"email": "skchan@se.cuhk.edu.hk"
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "Chinese named entity recognition (NER) has recently been viewed as a classification or sequence labeling problem, and many approaches have been proposed. However, they tend to address this problem without considering linguistic information in Chinese NEs. We propose a new framework based on probabilistic graphical models with firstorder logic for Chinese NER. First, we use Conditional Random Fields (CRFs), a standard and theoretically well-founded machine learning method based on undirected graphical models as a base system. Second, we introduce various types of domain knowledge into Markov Logic Networks (MLNs), an effective combination of first-order logic and probabilistic graphical models for validation and error correction of entities. Experimental results show that our framework of probabilistic graphical models with first-order logic significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art models for solving this task.",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "I08-1044",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "Chinese named entity recognition (NER) has recently been viewed as a classification or sequence labeling problem, and many approaches have been proposed. However, they tend to address this problem without considering linguistic information in Chinese NEs. We propose a new framework based on probabilistic graphical models with firstorder logic for Chinese NER. First, we use Conditional Random Fields (CRFs), a standard and theoretically well-founded machine learning method based on undirected graphical models as a base system. Second, we introduce various types of domain knowledge into Markov Logic Networks (MLNs), an effective combination of first-order logic and probabilistic graphical models for validation and error correction of entities. Experimental results show that our framework of probabilistic graphical models with first-order logic significantly outperforms the state-of-the-art models for solving this task.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Named entity recognition (NER) is the task of identifying and classifying phrases that denote certain types of named entities (NEs), such as person names (PERs), locations (LOCs) and organizations (ORGs) in text documents. It is a well-established task in the NLP and data mining communities and is regarded as crucial technology for many higher-level applications, such as information extraction, question answering, information retrieval and knowledge management. The NER problem has generated much interest and great progress has been made, as evidenced by its inclusion as an understanding task to be evaluated in the * The work described in this paper is substantially supported by grants from the Research Grant Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project Nos: CUHK 4179/03E and CUHK4193/04E) and the Direct Grant of the Faculty of Engineering, CUHK (Project Codes: 2050363 and 2050391) . This work is also affiliated with the Microsoft-CUHK Joint Laboratory for Human-centric Computing and Interface Technologies.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 865,
"end": 919,
"text": "Engineering, CUHK (Project Codes: 2050363 and 2050391)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Message Understanding Conference (MUC), the Multilingual Entity Task (MET) evaluations, and the Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Compared to European-language NER, Chinese NER seems to be more difficult (Yu et al., 2006) . Recent approaches to Chinese NER are a shift away from manually constructed rules or finite state patterns towards machine learning or statistical methods. However, rulebased NER systems lack robustness and portability. Statistical methods often suffer from the problem of data sparsity, and machine learning approaches (e.g., Hidden Markov Models (HMMs) (Bikel et al., 1999; Zhou and Su, 2002) , Support Vector Machines (SVMs) (Isozaki and Kazawa, 2002) , Maximum Entropy (MaxEnt) (Borthwick, 1999; Chieu and Ng, 2003) , Transformation-based Learning (TBL) (Brill, 1995) or variants of them) might be unsatisfactory to learn linguistic information in Chinese NEs. Current state-of-the-art models often view Chinese NER as a classification or sequence labeling problem without considering the linguistic and structural information in Chinese NEs. They assume that entities are independent, however in most cases this assumption does not hold because of the existing relationships among the entities. They seek to locate and identify named entities in text by sequentially classifying tokens (words or characters) as to whether or not they participate in an NE, which is sometimes prone to noise and errors.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 74,
"end": 91,
"text": "(Yu et al., 2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
},
{
"start": 449,
"end": 469,
"text": "(Bikel et al., 1999;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 470,
"end": 488,
"text": "Zhou and Su, 2002)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF28"
},
{
"start": 522,
"end": 548,
"text": "(Isozaki and Kazawa, 2002)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 576,
"end": 593,
"text": "(Borthwick, 1999;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
},
{
"start": 594,
"end": 613,
"text": "Chieu and Ng, 2003)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 652,
"end": 665,
"text": "(Brill, 1995)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "In fact, Chinese NEs have distinct linguistic characteristics in their composition and human beings usually use prior knowledge to recognize NEs. For example, about 365 of the highest frequently used surnames cover 99% Chinese surnames (Sun et al., 1995) . Some LOCs contain location salient words, while some ORGs contain organization salient words. For the LOC \"lA\u00ab/Hong Kong Special Region\", \"l/Hong Kong\" is the name part and \"A\u00ab/Special Region\" is the salient word. For the ORG \"lA\u00ab?/Hong Kong Special Region Government\", \"l/Hong Kong\" is the LOC name part, \"A\u00ab/Special Region\" is the LOC salient word and \"?/Government\" is the ORG salient word. Some ORGs contain one or more PERs, LOCs and ORGs. A more complex exam-ple is the nested ORG \" \u00ae\u00bd\u00b0D\u00abuAEO \u00c5AE/School of Computer Science, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing City\" which contains two ORGs \"uAE/Tsinghua University\" and \"O\u00c5AE /School of Computer Science\" and two LOCs \" \u00ae \u00bd/Beijing City\" and \"\u00b0D\u00ab/Haidian District\". The two ORGs contain ORG salient words \"AE/University\" and \"AE/School\", while the two LOCs contain LOC salient words \"\u00bd/City\" and \"\u00ab/District\" respectively.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 236,
"end": 254,
"text": "(Sun et al., 1995)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Inspired by the above observation, we propose a new framework based on probabilistic graphical models with first-order logic which treats Chinese NER 1 as a statistical relational learning (SRL) problem and makes use of domain knowledge. First, we employ Conditional Random Fields (CRFs), a discriminatively trained undirected graphical model which has theoretical justification and has been shown to be an effective approach to segmenting and labeling sequence data, as our base system. We then exploit a variety of domain knowledge into Markov Logic Networks (MLNs), a powerful combination of logic and probability, to validate and correct errors made in the base system. We show how a variety of domain knowledge can be formulated as first-order logic and incorporated into MLNs. We use three Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithms, including Gibbs sampling, Simulated Tempering, as well as MC-SAT, and Maximum a posteriori/Most Probable Explanation (MAP/MPE) algorithm for probabilistic inference in MLNs. Experimental results show that our framework based on graphical models with logic yields substantially better NER results, leading to a relative error reduction of up to 23.75% on the F-measure over state-of-the-art models. McNemar's tests confirm that the improvements we obtained are statistically highly significant. (Lafferty et al., 2001) are undirected graphical models trained to maximize the conditional probability of the desired outputs given the corresponding inputs. CRFs have the great flexibility to encode a wide variety of arbitrary, non-independent features and to straightforwardly combine rich domain knowledge. Furthermore, they are discriminatively trained, and are often more accurate than generative models, even with the same features. CRFs have been successfully applied to a number of real-world tasks, including NP chunking (Sha and Pereira, 2003) , Chinese word segmentation , information extraction (Pinto et al., 2003; , named entity identification (Mc-Callum and Li, 2003; Settles, 2004) , and many others.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 1334,
"end": 1357,
"text": "(Lafferty et al., 2001)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
},
{
"start": 1865,
"end": 1888,
"text": "(Sha and Pereira, 2003)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 1942,
"end": 1962,
"text": "(Pinto et al., 2003;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF19"
},
{
"start": 1993,
"end": 2017,
"text": "(Mc-Callum and Li, 2003;",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 2018,
"end": 2032,
"text": "Settles, 2004)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF22"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Recently, CRFs have been shown to perform exceptionally well on Chinese NER shared task on the third SIGHAN Chinese language processing bakeoff (SIGHAN-06) (Zhou et al., 2006; Chen et al., 2006b,a) . We follow the state-of-the-art CRF models using features that have been shown to be very effective in Chinese NER, namely the current character and its part-of-speech (POS) tag, several characters surrounding (both before and after) the current character and their POS tags, current word and several words surrounding the current word.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 156,
"end": 175,
"text": "(Zhou et al., 2006;",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 176,
"end": 197,
"text": "Chen et al., 2006b,a)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "We also observe some important issues that significantly influence the performance as follows: Window size: The primitive window size we use is 5 ( 2 characters preceding the current character and 2 following the current character). We extend the window size to 7 but find that it slightly hurts. The reason is that CRFs can deal with non-independent features. A larger window size may introduce noisy and irrelevant features. Feature representation: For character features, we use character identities. For word features, BIES representation (each character is beginning of a word, inside of a word, end of a word, or a single word) is employed. Labeling scheme: The labeling scheme can be BIO, BIOE or BIOES representation. In BIO representation, each character is tagged as either the beginning of a named entity (B), a character inside a named entity (I), or a character outside a named entity (O). In BIOE, the last character in an entity is labeled as E while in BIOES, single-character entities are labeled as S. In general, BIOES representation is more informative and yields better results than both BIO and BIOE.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "Even though the CRF model is able to accommodate a large number of well-engineered features which can be easily obtained across languages, some NEs, especially LOCs and ORGs are difficult to identify due to the lack of linguistic or structural characteristics. Since predictions are made token by token, some typical and serious tagging errors are still made, as shown below:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Error Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 ORG is incorrectly tagged as LOC: In Chinese, many",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Error Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "ORGs contain location information. The CRF model only tags the location information (in the ORGs) as LOCs.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Error Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "For example, \"/ \u00ecn\u00f3AE/Tangshan Technical Institute\" and \"\u00b0H/Hainan Provincial Committee \" are ORGs and they contain LOCs \"/\u00ec/Tangshan\" and \"\u00b0H /Hainan Province\", respectively. \"/\u00ec/Tangshan\" and \"\u00b0H/Hainan Province\" are only incorrectly tagged as LOCs. This affects the tagging performance of both ORGs and LOCs.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Error Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 LOC is incorrectly tagged as ORG: The LOCs \"GZy\u00ec /Sydney Opera\" and \"\u00aeN,/Beijing Gymnasium\" are mistakenly tagged as ORGs by the CRF model without taking into account the location salient words \"y \u00ec /Opera\" and \"N,/Gymnasium\".",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Error Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 The boundary of entity is tagged incorrectly: This mistake occurs for all the entities. For example, the PER \")0\u2022\u00b0d/Tom Cruise\" may be tagged as a PER \") 0/Tom\"; the LOC \"\u00d8 5r/Bremen\" may be tagged as a LOC \"5r/Laimei\", which is a meaningless word; the ORG \"u\u00fai/Huawei Corporation\" may be tagged as an ORG \"u/Huawei\". The reasons for these errors are both complicated and varied. However, some of them are related to linguistic knowledge.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Error Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Common nouns are incorrectly tagged as entities: For example, the two common nouns \"y\u00eaAE/Modern Mathematics\" and \"=\u00ac\u00c5\u00ac/Galanz Microwave Oven\" may be improperly tagged as a LOC and an ORG. Some tagging errors could be easily rectified. Take the erroneous ORG \"\u00bd| \u00a7/City Committee Organizes,\" for example, intuitively it is not an ORG since an entity cannot span any punctuation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Error Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "3 Our Proposed Framework",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Error Analysis",
"sec_num": "2.2"
},
{
"text": "We propose a framework based on probabilistic graphical models with first-order logic for Chinese NER. As shown in Figure 1 , the framework is composed of three main components. The CRF model is used as a base model. Then we incorporate domain knowledge that can be well formulated into first-order logic to extract entity candidates from CRF results. Finally, the Markov Logic Network (MLN), an undirected graphical model for statistical relational learning, is used to validate and correct the errors made in the base model. We begin by briefly reviewing the necessary background of MLNs, including weight learning and inference.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 115,
"end": 123,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Overview",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "A Markov Network (also known as Markov Random Field) is a model for the joint distribution of a set of variables (Pearl, 1988) . It is composed of an undirected graph G = (V, E) and a set of real-valued potential functions \u03c6 k . A First-Order Knowledge Base (KB) (Genesereth and Nislsson, 1987) is a set of sentences or formulas in first-order logic.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 113,
"end": 126,
"text": "(Pearl, 1988)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "A Markov Logic Network (MLN) (Richardson and Domingos, 2006 ) is a KB with a weight attached to each formula (or clause). Together with a set of constants representing objects in the domain, it species a ground Markov Network containing one feature for each possible grounding of a first-order formula F i in the KB, with the corresponding weight w i . The basic idea in MLNs is that: when a world violates one formula in the KB it is less probable, but not impossible. The fewer formulas a world violates, the more probable it is. The weights associated with the formulas in an MLN jointly determine the probabilities of those formulas (and vice versa) via a log-linear model. An MLN is a statistical relational model that defines a probability distribution over Herbrand interpretations (possible worlds), and can be thought of as a template for constructing Markov Networks. Given different sets of constants, it will produce different networks. These networks will have certain regularities in structure and parameter given by the MLN and they are called ground Markov Networks. Suppose Peter(A), Smith(B) and IBM(X) are 3 constants, a KB and generated features are listed in Table 1 . The formula Employ(x,y)\u21d2Person(x),Company(y) means x is employed by y and Colleague(x,y)\u21d2 Employ(x,z)\u2227Employ(y,z) means x and y are colleagues if they are employed by the same company. Figure 2 shows the graph of the ground Markov network defined by the formulas in Table 1 and the 3 constants Peter(A), Smith(B) and IBM(X). The probability distribution over possible worlds x specified by the ground Markov Network M L,C is given by",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 29,
"end": 59,
"text": "(Richardson and Domingos, 2006",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 1180,
"end": 1187,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
},
{
"start": 1375,
"end": 1381,
"text": "Figure",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 1456,
"end": 1463,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "EQUATION",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 8,
"text": "EQUATION",
"ref_id": "EQREF",
"raw_str": "P (X = x) = 1 Z exp( w i n i (x )) = 1 Z \u03c6 i x {i} ni(x)",
"eq_num": "(1)"
}
],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "where n i (x) is the number of true groundings of F i in x, x {i} is the true value of the atoms appearing in F i , and",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "\u03c6 i x {i} = e wi .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "In the case of Chinese NER, a named entity can be connected to another named entity for instance, because they share the same location salient word. Thus in an undirected graph, two node types exist, the LOC nodes and the location salient word nodes. The links (edges) indicate the relation (LOCs contain location salient words) between them. This representation can be well expressed by MLNs.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "However, one problem concerning relational data is, how to extract useful relations for Chinese NER. There are many kinds of relations between NEs, some relations are critical to the NER problem while others not. Another problem that we address is whether these relations can be formulated in first-order logic and combined in MLNs. In Section 3.3, we exploit domain knowledge. We will show how these knowledge can capture essential characteristics of Chinese NEs and can be well and concisely formulated in first-order logic in Section 3.4. 3.2.1 Learning Weights Given a relational database, MLN weights can in principle be learned generatively by maximizing the likelihood of this database on the closed world assumption. The gradient of the log-likelihood with respect to the weights is",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "\u2202 \u2202w i logP w (X = x) = n i (x) \u2212 P w (X = x )n i (x )",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "(2) where the sum is over all possible databases x , and P w (X = x ) is P (X = x ) computed using the current weight vector w = (w 1 , ..., w i , ...). Unfortunately, computing these expectations can be very expensive. Instead, we can maximize the pseudo-log-likelihood of the data more efficiently. If x is a possible database and x l is the lth ground atom's truth value, the pseudo-log-likelihood of x given weights w is",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "logP * w (X = x) = n l=1 logP w (X l=x l | M B x (X l )) (3)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "where M B x (X l ) is the state of X l 's Markov blanket 2 in the data. Computing Equation 3 and its gradient does not require inference over the model, and is therefore much faster. We can optimize the pseudo-log-likelihood using the limited-memory BFGS algorithm (Liu and Nocedal, 1989) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 265,
"end": 288,
"text": "(Liu and Nocedal, 1989)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Markov Logic Networks",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "If F 1 and F 2 are two formulas in first-order logic, C is a finite set of constants including any constants that appear in F 1 or F 2 , and L is an MLN, then",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inference",
"sec_num": "3.2.2"
},
{
"text": "EQUATION",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [
{
"start": 0,
"end": 8,
"text": "EQUATION",
"ref_id": "EQREF",
"raw_str": "P (F 1 | F 2 , L, C) = P (F 1 | F 2 , M L,C ) = P (F 1 \u2227 F 2 | M L,C ) P (F 2 | M L,C ) = x\u2208\u03c7 F 1 \u2229\u03c7 F 2 P (X = x | M L,C ) x\u2208\u03c7 F 2 P (X = x | M L,C )",
"eq_num": "(4)"
}
],
"section": "Inference",
"sec_num": "3.2.2"
},
{
"text": "where \u03c7 Fi is the set of worlds where F i holds, and P (x | M L,C ) is given by Equation 1. The question of whether a knowledge base entails a formula F in first-order logic is the question of whether P (F | L KB , C KB,F ) = 1, where L KB is the MLN obtained by assigning infinite weight to all the formulas in KB, and C KB,F is the set of all constants appearing in KB or F .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inference",
"sec_num": "3.2.2"
},
{
"text": "A large number of efficient inference techniques are applicable to MLNs. The most widely used approximate solution to probabilistic inference in MLNs is Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) (Gilks et al., 1996) . In this framework, the Gibbs sampling algorithm is to generate an instance from the distribution of each variable in turn, conditional on the current values of the other variables. The key to the Gibbs sampler is that one only considers univariate conditional distributions-the distribution when all of the random variables but one are assigned fixed values. One way to speed up Gibbs sampling is by Simulated Tempering (Marinari and Parisi, 1992) , which performs simulation in a generalized ensemble, and can rapidly achieve an equilibrium state. Poon and Domingos (2006) proposed MC-SAT, an inference algorithm that combines ideas from MCMC and satisfiability. MC-SAT works well and is guaranteed to be sound, even when deterministic or neardeterministic dependencies are present in real-world reasoning.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 185,
"end": 205,
"text": "(Gilks et al., 1996)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 628,
"end": 655,
"text": "(Marinari and Parisi, 1992)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF14"
},
{
"start": 757,
"end": 781,
"text": "Poon and Domingos (2006)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF20"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inference",
"sec_num": "3.2.2"
},
{
"text": "Besides MCMC framework, maximum a posteriori (MAP) inference can be carried out using a weighted satisfiability solver like MaxWalkSAT. It is closely related to maximum likelihood (ML), but employs an augmented optimization objective which incorporates a prior distribution over the quantity one wants to estimate. MAP estimation can therefore be seen as a regularization of ML estimation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inference",
"sec_num": "3.2.2"
},
{
"text": "We incorporate various kinds of domain knowledge via MLNs to predict the newly extracted NE candidates from CRF hypotheses. We extract 165 location salient words and 843 organization salient words from Wikipedia 3 and the LDC Chinese-English bi-directional NE lists compiled from Xinhua News database, as shown in Table 2 . We also make a punctuation list which contains 18 items and some stopwords which Chinese NEs cannot contain. The stopwords are mainly conjunctions, auxiliary and functional words. We extract new NE candidates from the CRF results according to the following consideration:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 314,
"end": 321,
"text": "Table 2",
"ref_id": "TABREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Definitely, if a chunk (a series of continuous characters) occurs in the training data as a PER or a LOC or an ORG, then this chunk should be a PER or a LOC or an ORG in the testing data. In general, a unique string is defined as a PER, it cannot be a LOC somewhere else.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Obviously, if a tagged entity ends with a location salient word, it is a LOC. If a tagged entity ends with an organization salient word, it is an ORG.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 If a tagged entity is close to a subsequent location salient word, probably they should be combined together as a LOC. The closer they are, the more likely that they should be combined.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 If a series of consecutive tagged entities are close to a subsequent organization salient word, they should probably be combined together as an ORG because an ORG may contain multiple PERs, LOCs and ORGs.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Similarly, if there exists a series of consecutive tagged entities and the last one is tagged as an ORG, it is likely that all of them should be combined as an ORG.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Entity length restriction: all kinds of tagged entities cannot exceed 25 Chinese characters.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Stopword restriction: intuitively, all tagged entities cannot comprise any stopword.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Punctuation restriction: in general, all tagged entities cannot span any punctuation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 Since all NEs are proper nouns, the tagged entities should end with noun words.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 The CRF model tags each token (Chinese character) with a conditional probability. A low probability implies a low-confidence prediction. For a chunk with low conditional probabilities, all the above assumptions are adopted (The marginal probabilities are normalized, and probabilities lower than the user-defined threshold are regarded as low conditional probabilities).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "All the above domain knowledge can be formulated as first-order logic to construct the structure of MLNs. And all the extracted chunks are accepted as new NE candidates (or common nouns). We train an MLN to recognize them. 1/and so on \u00b5 @/that",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Domain Knowledge",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "We declared 14 predicates (person(candidate), lo cation(candidate), organization(candidat e), endwith(candidate, salientword), clos eto(candidate, salientword), containstop word(candidate), containpunctuation(cand idate), etc) and specified 15 first-order formulas (See Table 3 for some examples) according to the domain knowledge described in Section 3.3. For example, we used person(candidate) to specify whether a candidate is a PER. Formulas are recursively constructed from atomic formulas using logical connectives and quantifiers. They are constructed using four types of symbols: constants, variables, functions, and predicates. Constant symbols represent objects in the domain of interest (e.g., \" \u00ae/Beijing\" and \"\u00fe\u00b0/Shanghai\" are LOCs). Variable symbols (e.g., r and p) range over the objects in the domain. To reduce the size of ground Markov Network, variables and constants are typed; for example, the variable r may range over candidates, and the constant \" \u00ae/Beijing\" may represent a LOC. Function symbols represent mappings from tuples of objects to objects. Predicate symbols represent relations among objects (e.g., person) in the domain or attributes of objects (e.g., endwith). A ground atom is an atomic formula all of whose arguments are ground terms (terms containing no variables). For example, the ground atom location( \u00ae\u00bd) conveys that \"\u00ae\u00bd/Beijing City\" is a LOC.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 270,
"end": 277,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF3"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "First-Order Logic Representation",
"sec_num": "3.4"
},
{
"text": "For example in Table 3 , \"\u00bf\u00bd/Wu City\" is mis-tagged as an ORG by the CRF model, but it contains the location salient word \"\u00bd/City\". So it is extracted as a new entity candidate, and the corresponding formula endwith(r, p)\u2227locsalientword(p)\u21d2location(r) means if r ends with a location salient word p, then it is a LOC. Besides the formulas listed in Table 3 , we also specified logic such as person(p)\u21d2!(location(p) v organization(p)), which means a candidate p can ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 15,
"end": 22,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF3"
},
{
"start": 349,
"end": 356,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": "TABREF3"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "First-Order Logic Representation",
"sec_num": "3.4"
},
{
"text": "containstopword(p)\u21d2!(person(p) v location(p) v organization(p)) \"z\"\u00d1\u00d6\u00a5%[ORG] \"z\"\u00d1\u00d6\u00a5% containpunctuation(p)\u21d2!(person(p) v location(p) v organization(p))",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "First-Order Logic Representation",
"sec_num": "3.4"
},
{
"text": "only belong to one class. We assume that the relational database contains only binary relations. Each extracted NE candidate is represented by one or more strings appearing as arguments of ground atoms in the database. The goal of NE prediction is to determine whether the candidates are entities and the types of entities (query predicates), given the evidence predicates and other relations that can be deterministically derived from the database. As we will see, despite their simplicity and consistency, these first-order formulas incorporate the essential features for NE prediction.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "First-Order Logic Representation",
"sec_num": "3.4"
},
{
"text": "We used People's Daily corpus (January-Jun, 1998) in our experiments, which contains approximately 357K sentences, 156K PERs, 219K LOCs and 87K ORGs, respectively. We did some modifications on the original data to make it cleaner. We enriched some tags so that the abbreviation proper nouns are well labeled. We preprocessed some nested names to make them in better form. We also processed some person names. We enriched tags for different kinds of person names (e.g., Chinese and transliterated names) and separated consecutive person names.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Dataset",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "We use CRFs to build a character-based Chinese NER system, with features described in Section 2.1. To avoid overfitting, we penalized the log-likelihood by the commonly used zero-mean Gaussian prior over the parameters. In addition, we exploit clue word features which can capture non-local dependencies. This gives us a competitive baseline CRF model using both local and non-local information for Chinese NER.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Baseline NER System",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "For clue word features, we employ 412 career titles (e.g., o\u00da/President, \u00c7/Professor,\u00b4\u00a9/Police), 59 family titles (e.g., ww/Father,~~/Sister), 33 personal pronouns (e.g., \\/Your, \u2022/We) and 109 direction words (e.g., \u00b1/North, H\u00dc/South) to represent non-local information. Career titles, family titles and personal pronouns may Figure 3 : An Example of Non-local Dependency. The Career Title \"\u00c7\" Indicates a PER \"^\" imply a nearby PER and direction words may indicate a LOC or an ORG. Figure 3 illustrates an example of nonlocal dependency. We do not take the advantage of using the goldenstandard word segmentation and POS tagging provided in the original corpus, since such information is hardly available in real text. Instead, we use an off-the-shelf Chinese lexical analysis system, the open source ICTCLAS (Zhang et al., 2003) , to segment and POS tag the corpus. This module employs a hierarchical Hidden Markov Model (HHMM) and provides word segmentation, POS tagging (labels Chinese words using a set of 39 tags) and unknown word recognition. It performs reasonably well, with segmentation precision recently evaluated at 97.58%. The recall of unknown words using role tagging is over 90%.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 810,
"end": 830,
"text": "(Zhang et al., 2003)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF27"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 326,
"end": 334,
"text": "Figure 3",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 483,
"end": 491,
"text": "Figure 3",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Baseline NER System",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "We use one-month corpus for training and 9-day corpus for testing. Table 4 shows the experimental results.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 67,
"end": 74,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": "TABREF4"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "The Baseline NER System",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "To test the effectiveness of our proposed model, we extract all the NEs (19, 879 PERs, 25, 661 LOCs and 11, 590 ORGs) from the training corpus. An MLN training database, which consists of 14 predicates, 16,620 constants and 97,992 ground atoms was built. The MLNs were trained using a Gaussian prior with zero mean and unit variance on each weight to penalize the pseudo-likelihood, and with the weights initialized at the mode of the prior (zero). During MLN learning, each formula is converted to Conjunctive Normal Form (CNF), and a weight is learned for each of its clauses. The weight of a clause is used as the mean of a Gaussian prior for the learned weight. These weights reflect how often the clauses are actually observed in the training data. We extract 529 entity candidates to construct the MLN testing database, which contains 2,543 entries and these entries are used as evidence for inference. Inference is per-formed by grounding the minimal subset of the network required for answering the query predicates. We employed 3 MCMC algorithms: Gibbs sampling (GS), Simulated Tempering (ST) as well as MC-SAT, and the MAP/MPE algorithm for inference and the comparative NER results are shown. The probabilistic graphical models greatly outperform the CRF model stand-alone by a large margin. It can be seen from Table 5 , the probabilistic graphical models integrating first-order logic improve the precision and recall for all kinds of entities, thus boosting the overall Fmeasure. We achieve a 23.75% relative error reduction (RER) on F-measure by using 3 MCMC algorithms and a 20.54% RER by using MAP/MPE algorithm, over an already competitive CRF baseline. We obtained the same results using GS, ST and MC-SAT algorithms. MCMC algorithms yields slightly better results than the MAP/MPE algorithm.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 72,
"end": 76,
"text": "(19,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 77,
"end": 86,
"text": "879 PERs,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 87,
"end": 90,
"text": "25,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 91,
"end": 107,
"text": "661 LOCs and 11,",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 108,
"end": 117,
"text": "590 ORGs)",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 1323,
"end": 1330,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": "TABREF5"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "NER System Based on Graphical Models with Logic",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "Ideally, comparisons among NER systems would control for feature sets, data preparation, training and test procedures, parameter tuning, and estimate the statistical significance of performance differences. Unfortunately, reported results sometimes leave out details needed for accurate comparisons.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Significance Test",
"sec_num": "4.4"
},
{
"text": "We give statistical significance estimates using McNemar's paired tests 4 (Gillick and Cox, 1989) on labeling disagreements for CRF model and graphical probabilistic models that we evaluated directly. Table 6 summarizes the correctness of the labeling decisions between the models with a 95% confidence interval (CI). These tests suggest that the graphical probabilistic models are significantly more accurate and confirm that the gains we obtained are statistically highly significant. ",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 74,
"end": 97,
"text": "(Gillick and Cox, 1989)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 201,
"end": 208,
"text": "Table 6",
"ref_id": "TABREF6"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Significance Test",
"sec_num": "4.4"
},
{
"text": "As a well-established task, Chinese NER has been studied extensively and a number of techniques for this task have been reported in the literature. Most recently, the trend in Chinese NER is to use improved machine learning approaches, or to integrate various kinds of useful evidences, features, or resources. Fu and Luke (2005) presented a lexicalized HMMbased approach to unifying unknown word identification and NER as a single tagging task on a sequence of known words. Although lexicalized HMMs was shown to be superior to standard HMMs, this approach has some disadvantages: it is a purely statistical model and it suffers from the problem of data sparseness. And the model fails to tag some complicated NEs (e.g., nested ORGs) correctly due to lack of domain adaptive techniques. The F-measures of LOCs and ORGs are only 87.13 and 83.60, which show that there is still a room for improving.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 311,
"end": 329,
"text": "Fu and Luke (2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "A method of incorporating heuristic human knowledge into a statistical model was proposed in (Wu et al., 2005) . Here Chinese NER was regarded as a probabilistic tagging problem and the heuristic human knowledge was used to reduce the searching space. However, this method assumes that POS tags are golden-standard in the training data and heuristic human knowledge is often ad hoc. These drawbacks make the method unstable and highly sensitive to POS errors; and when golden-standard POS tags are not available (this is often the case), it may degrade the performance.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 93,
"end": 110,
"text": "(Wu et al., 2005)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "Cohen and Sarawagi 2004proposed a semi-Markov model which combines a Markovian, HMM-like extraction process and a dictionary component. This process is based on sequentially classifying segments of several adjacent words. However, this technique requires that entire segments have the same class label, while our technique does not. Moreover, compared to a large-scale dictionary, our domain knowledge is much easier to obtain.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "However, all the above models treat NER as classification or sequence labeling problem. To the best of our knowledge, MLNs have not been previously used for NER problem. To our knowledge, we first view Chinese NER as a statistical relational learning problem and exploit domain knowledge which can be concisely formulated in MLNs, allowing the training and inference algorithms to be directly applied to them.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "5"
},
{
"text": "The contribution of this paper is three-fold. First, we formulate Chinese NER as a statistical relational learning problem and propose a new framework incorporating probabilistic graphical models and first-order logic for Chinese NER which achieves state-of-the-art performance. Second, We incorporate domain knowledge to capture the essential features of the NER task via MLNs, a unified framework for SRL which produces a set of weighted firstorder clauses to predict new NE candidates. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt at using MLNs for the NER problem in the NLP community. Third, our proposed framework can be extendable to languageindependent NER, due to the simplicity of the domain knowledge we could access. Directions for future work include learning the structure of MLNs automatically and using MLNs for information extraction (e.g., entity relation extraction).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusion and Future Work",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "In this paper we only focus on PERs, LOCs and ORGs. Since temporal, numerical and monetary phrases can be well identified with rule-based approaches.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The Markov blanket of a node is the minimal set of nodes that renders it independent of the remaining network; in a MLN, this is simply the node's neighbors in the graph.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Most researchers refer to statistically significant as p < 0.05 and statistically highly significant as p < 0.001.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Junsheng Zhou, Liang He, Xinyu Dai, and Jiajun Chen. Chinese named entity recognition with a multi-phase model. In 5th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, Australia, July 2006.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "An algorithm that learns what's in a name",
"authors": [
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Daniel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Richard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bikel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ralph",
"middle": [
"M"
],
"last": "Schwartz",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Weischedel",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1999,
"venue": "Machine Learning",
"volume": "34",
"issue": "",
"pages": "211--231",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Daniel M. Bikel, Richard Schwartz, and Ralph M. Weischedel. An algorithm that learns what's in a name. Machine Learning, 34(1-3):211-231, February 1999.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "A Maximum Entropy Approach to Named Entity Recognition",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Borthwick",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1999,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Andrew Borthwick. A Maximum Entropy Approach to Named Entity Recognition. PhD thesis, New York University, September 1999.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Eric",
"middle": [],
"last": "Brill",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1995,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "21",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "543--565",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Eric Brill. Transformation-based error-driven learning and natural language processing: A case study in part-of-speech tagging. Computational Linguistics, 21(4):543-565, 1995.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Chinese named entity recognition with conditional probabilistic models",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Aitao",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fuchun",
"middle": [],
"last": "Peng",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roy",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gordon",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sun",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "5th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Aitao Chen, Fuchun Peng, Roy Shan, and Gordon Sun. Chinese named entity recognition with conditional probabilistic models. In 5th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, Australia, July 2006.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "Chinese named entity recognition with conditional random fields",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Wenliang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yujie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hitoshi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Isahara",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "5th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Wenliang Chen, Yujie Zhang, and Hitoshi Isahara. Chinese named entity recognition with condi- tional random fields. In 5th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, Australia, July 2006.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "Named entity recognition with a maximum entropy approach",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Hai",
"middle": [],
"last": "Leong Chieu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hwee Tou",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ng",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "Proceedings of CoNLL-03",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hai Leong Chieu and Hwee Tou Ng. Named entity recognition with a maximum entropy approach. In Proceedings of CoNLL-03, 2003.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Exploiting dictionaries in named entity extraction: Combining semi-Markov extraction processes and data integration methods",
"authors": [
{
"first": "W",
"middle": [],
"last": "William",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sunita",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cohen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sarawagi",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of ACM-SIGKDD 2004",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "William W. Cohen and Sunita Sarawagi. Exploiting dictionaries in named entity extraction: Com- bining semi-Markov extraction processes and data integration methods. In Proceedings of ACM-SIGKDD 2004, 2004.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Chinese named entity recognition using lexicalized HMMs",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Guohong",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kang-Kwong",
"middle": [],
"last": "Luke",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter",
"volume": "7",
"issue": "",
"pages": "19--25",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Guohong Fu and Kang-Kwong Luke. Chinese named entity recognition using lexicalized HMMs. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 7:19-25, June 2005.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "Logical foundations of artificial intelligence",
"authors": [
{
"first": "R",
"middle": [],
"last": "Michael",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Nils",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Genesereth",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nislsson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1987,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Michael R. Genesereth and Nils J. Nislsson. Logical foundations of artificial intelligence. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Mateo, CA, 1987.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chapman and Hall",
"authors": [
{
"first": "W",
"middle": [
"R"
],
"last": "Gilks",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Richardson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Spiegelhalter",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1996,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "W.R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D.J. Spiegelhalter. Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice. Chap- man and Hall, London, UK, 1996.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Some statistical issues in the comparison of speech recognition algorithms",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gillick",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Stephen",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cox",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1989,
"venue": "Proceedings of ICASSP-89",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "532--535",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "L. Gillick and Stephen Cox. Some statistical issues in the comparison of speech recognition algo- rithms. In Proceedings of ICASSP-89, pages 532-535, 1989.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Efficient support vector classifiers for named entity recognition",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Hideki",
"middle": [],
"last": "Isozaki",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hideto",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kazawa",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2002,
"venue": "Proceedings of COLING-02",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--7",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hideki Isozaki and Hideto Kazawa. Efficient support vector classifiers for named entity recogni- tion. In Proceedings of COLING-02, pages 1-7, Taipei, Taiwan, 2002.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data",
"authors": [
{
"first": "John",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lafferty",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mccallum",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fernando",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pereira",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2001,
"venue": "Proceedings of ICML-01",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "282--289",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "John Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, and Fernando Pereira. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In Proceedings of ICML-01, pages 282- 289. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, CA, 2001.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimization",
"authors": [
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "Dong",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jorge",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Nocedal",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1989,
"venue": "Mathematical Programming",
"volume": "45",
"issue": "",
"pages": "503--528",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dong C. Liu and Jorge Nocedal. On the limited memory BFGS method for large scale optimiza- tion. Mathematical Programming, 45:503-528, 1989.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "Simulated Tempering: A new Monte Carlo scheme",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Enzo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Marinari",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Giorgio",
"middle": [],
"last": "Parisi",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1992,
"venue": "Europhysics Letters",
"volume": "19",
"issue": "",
"pages": "451--458",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Enzo Marinari and Giorgio Parisi. Simulated Tempering: A new Monte Carlo scheme. Europhysics Letters, 19:451-458, 1992.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Early results for named entity recognition with conditional random fields, feature induction and web-enhanced lexicons",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mccallum",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Wei",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "Proceedings of CoNLL-03",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Andrew McCallum and Wei Li. Early results for named entity recognition with conditional random fields, feature induction and web-enhanced lexicons. In Proceedings of CoNLL-03, 2003.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Judea",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pearl",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Judea Pearl. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference. Mor- gan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco, CA, 1988.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Accurate information extraction from research papers using conditional random fields",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Fuchun",
"middle": [],
"last": "Peng",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mccallum",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "329--336",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Fuchun Peng and Andrew McCallum. Accurate information extraction from research papers using conditional random fields. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004, pages 329-336, 2004.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Chinese segmentation and new word detection using conditional random fields",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Fuchun",
"middle": [],
"last": "Peng",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fangfang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Feng",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mccallum",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of COLING-04",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "562--568",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Fuchun Peng, Fangfang Feng, and Andrew McCallum. Chinese segmentation and new word de- tection using conditional random fields. In Proceedings of COLING-04, pages 562-568, 2004.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "Table extraction using conditional random fields",
"authors": [
{
"first": "David",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pinto",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mccallum",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Xing",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wei",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "W",
"middle": [
"Bruce"
],
"last": "Croft",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "Proceedings of ACM SIGIR-03",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "David Pinto, Andrew McCallum, Xing Wei, and W. Bruce Croft. Table extraction using conditional random fields. In Proceedings of ACM SIGIR-03, 2003.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "Sound and efficient inference with probabilistic and deterministic dependencies",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Hoifung",
"middle": [],
"last": "Poon",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pedro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Domingos",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "Proceedings of AAAI-06",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hoifung Poon and Pedro Domingos. Sound and efficient inference with probabilistic and deter- ministic dependencies. In Proceedings of AAAI-06, Boston, Massachusetts, July 2006. The AAAI Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "Markov logic networks",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Matthew",
"middle": [],
"last": "Richardson",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pedro",
"middle": [],
"last": "Domingos",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "Machine Learning",
"volume": "62",
"issue": "",
"pages": "107--136",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Matthew Richardson and Pedro Domingos. Markov logic networks. Machine Learning, 62(1- 2):107-136, 2006.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "Biomedical named entity recognition using conditional random fields and rich feature sets",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Burr",
"middle": [],
"last": "Settles",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Proceedings of the COLING 2004 International Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and its Applications",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Burr Settles. Biomedical named entity recognition using conditional random fields and rich feature sets. In Proceedings of the COLING 2004 International Joint Workshop on Natural Language Processing in Biomedicine and its Applications, Geneva, Switzerland, 2004.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "Shallow parsing with conditional random fields",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Fei",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sha",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fernando",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pereira",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "213--220",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Fei Sha and Fernando Pereira. Shallow parsing with conditional random fields. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003, pages 213-220, 2003.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Identifying Chinese names in unrestricted texts",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Maosong",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sun",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Changning",
"middle": [],
"last": "Huang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Haiyan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jie",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fang",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1995,
"venue": "Journal of Chinese Information Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Maosong Sun, Changning Huang, Haiyan Gao, and Jie Fang. Identifying Chinese names in unre- stricted texts. Journal of Chinese Information Processing, 1995.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "Chinese named entity recognition based on multiple features",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Youzheng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jun",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Bo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Xu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hao",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2005,
"venue": "Proceedings of HLT-EMNLP 2005",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Youzheng Wu, Jun Zhao, Bo Xu, and Hao Yu. Chinese named entity recognition based on multiple features. In Proceedings of HLT-EMNLP 2005, 2005.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "Boosting for Chinese named entity recognition",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Xiaofeng",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Marine",
"middle": [],
"last": "Carpuat",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dekai",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "5th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Xiaofeng Yu, Marine Carpuat, and Dekai Wu. Boosting for Chinese named entity recognition. In 5th SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, Australia, July 2006.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "Chinese lexical analysis using Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ping",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hua",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Qun",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Xue-Qi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hao",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cheng",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hong Kui",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "2nd SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing",
"volume": "17",
"issue": "",
"pages": "63--70",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hua Ping Zhang, Qun Liu, Xue-Qi Cheng, Hao Zhang, and Hong Kui Yu. Chinese lexical analysis using Hierarchical Hidden Markov Model. In 2nd SIGHAN Workshop on Chinese Language Processing, volume 17, pages 63-70, 2003.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "Named entity recognition using an HMM-based chunk tagger",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Guodong",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zhou",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Su",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2002,
"venue": "Proceedings of ACL-02",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "473--480",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Guodong Zhou and Jian Su. Named entity recognition using an HMM-based chunk tagger. In Proceedings of ACL-02, pages 473-480, Philadelphia, USA, 2002.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"type_str": "figure",
"text": "Figure 1: Framework Overview",
"uris": null,
"num": null
},
"FIGREF1": {
"type_str": "figure",
"text": "A Ground Markov network defined by the formulas inTable 1and the constants Peter(A), Smith(B) and IBM(X).",
"uris": null,
"num": null
},
"TABREF1": {
"content": "<table/>",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"text": "Example of a KB and Generated FeaturesFist-Order Logic (KB) Generated Features \u2200 x,y Employ(x,y)\u21d2Person(x),Company(y) Employ(Peter,IBM)\u21d2Person(Peter),Company(IBM) Employ(Smith,IBM)\u21d2Person(Smith),Company(IBM) \u2200 x,y,z Colleague(x,y)\u21d2 Employ(x,z)\u2227Employ(y,z) Colleague(Peter,Smith)\u21d2 Employ(Peter,IBM) \u2227Employ(Smith,IBM)",
"num": null
},
"TABREF2": {
"content": "<table><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Location Salient Word g\u00a3\u00ab/Municipality z\u00c0\u00fai/Department Store Organization Salient Word \u00bb\u00d5/Railway Station n\u00f3AE/Technical Institute U,/Hotel \u00c01/Travel Agency \u00fa\u00a9/Park \u00d1/Press p\u00a6/Plateau <\u00af\u00dc/Personnel Department /Province \u00d51/Bank \u00a9/Town AE/University \u00bd/City \u00bd/City Committee</td></tr><tr><td>Stopword E,/still \u00a2\u00b4/but ~/very '/of</td><td>Punctuation \" \u00ba \u00a7 ;</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"text": "Domain Knowledge for Chinese NER",
"num": null
},
"TABREF3": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>Mis-tagged NEs F.p[common noun] F.p New NE Candidates m[PER] m \u00f08\u00ec[common noun] \u00f08\u00ec \u00bf\u00bd[ORG] \u00bf\u00bd =!?[LOC] =!? \u00b0[LOC]s\u00a9 \u00b0s\u00a9 a\u00ac[LOC]\u00e9 a\u00ac\u00e9 \u00bd\u00ab'\u00cbe[LOC] \u00bd\u00ab'\u00cbe</td><td>First-Order Logic occurperson(p)\u21d2person(p) occurlocation(p)\u21d2location(p) occurorganization(p)\u21d2organization(p) endwith(r,p)\u2227locsalientword(p)\u21d2location(r) endwith(r,p)\u2227orgsalientword(p)\u21d2organization(r) closeto(r,p)\u2227locsalientword(p)\u21d2location(r) closeto(r,p)\u2227orgsalientword(p)\u21d2organization(r)</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"text": "Examples of NE Candidates and First-Order Formulas",
"num": null
},
"TABREF4": {
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td colspan=\"2\">Precision Recall</td><td>F \u03b2=1</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Character features</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>PER</td><td>92.88%</td><td>79.42%</td><td>85.62</td></tr><tr><td>LOC</td><td>90.95%</td><td>82.88%</td><td>86.73</td></tr><tr><td>ORG</td><td>88.16%</td><td>83.86%</td><td>85.96</td></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>90.92%</td><td>82.07%</td><td>86.27</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Character+Word</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>PER</td><td>93.27%</td><td>82.99%</td><td>87.83</td></tr><tr><td>LOC</td><td>91.49%</td><td>85.16%</td><td>88.21</td></tr><tr><td>ORG</td><td>88.94%</td><td>84.79%</td><td>86.82</td></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>91.48%</td><td>84.46%</td><td>87.83</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">Character+Word+POS</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>PER</td><td>92.17%</td><td>90.64%</td><td>91.40</td></tr><tr><td>LOC</td><td>90.56%</td><td>89.74%</td><td>90.15</td></tr><tr><td>ORG</td><td>89.15%</td><td>85.19%</td><td>87.12</td></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>90.76%</td><td>89.13%</td><td>89.94</td></tr><tr><td>All features</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>PER</td><td>92.12%</td><td>90.57%</td><td>91.34</td></tr><tr><td>LOC</td><td>90.62%</td><td>89.74%</td><td>90.18</td></tr><tr><td>ORG</td><td>89.72%</td><td>85.44%</td><td>87.53</td></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>90.89%</td><td>89.16%</td><td>90.02</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"text": "Chinese NER by CRF Model",
"num": null
},
"TABREF5": {
"content": "<table><tr><td/><td colspan=\"2\">Precision Recall</td><td>F \u03b2=1</td><td>RER</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"2\">CRF Baseline</td><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>PER</td><td>92.12%</td><td>90.57%</td><td>91.34</td><td/></tr><tr><td>LOC</td><td>90.62%</td><td>89.74%</td><td>90.18</td><td/></tr><tr><td>ORG</td><td>89.72%</td><td>85.44%</td><td>87.53</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>90.89%</td><td>89.16%</td><td>90.02</td><td/></tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\">Graphical Models (GS Inference)</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>PER</td><td>93.52%</td><td>93.32%</td><td>93.42</td><td/></tr><tr><td>LOC</td><td>93.19%</td><td>91.91%</td><td>92.55</td><td/></tr><tr><td>ORG</td><td>90.16%</td><td>90.71%</td><td>90.43</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>92.70%</td><td>92.09%</td><td>92.39</td><td>23.75%</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"3\">Graphical Models (ST Inference)</td><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>PER</td><td>93.52%</td><td>93.32%</td><td>93.42</td><td/></tr><tr><td>LOC</td><td>93.19%</td><td>91.91%</td><td>92.55</td><td/></tr><tr><td>ORG</td><td>90.16%</td><td>90.71%</td><td>90.43</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>92.70%</td><td>92.09%</td><td>92.39</td><td>23.75%</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Graphical Models (MC-SAT Inference)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>PER</td><td>93.52%</td><td>93.32%</td><td>93.42</td><td/></tr><tr><td>LOC</td><td>93.19%</td><td>91.91%</td><td>92.55</td><td/></tr><tr><td>ORG</td><td>90.16%</td><td>90.71%</td><td>90.43</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>92.70%</td><td>92.09%</td><td>92.39</td><td>23.75%</td></tr><tr><td colspan=\"4\">Graphical Models (MAP/MPE Inference)</td><td/></tr><tr><td>PER</td><td>92.87%</td><td>93.15%</td><td>93.01</td><td/></tr><tr><td>LOC</td><td>93.15%</td><td>91.61%</td><td>92.37</td><td/></tr><tr><td>ORG</td><td>90.56%</td><td>89.10%</td><td>89.82</td><td/></tr><tr><td>Overall</td><td>92.57%</td><td>91.58%</td><td>92.07</td><td>20.54%</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"text": "Chinese NER by Graphical Models with Logic",
"num": null
},
"TABREF6": {
"content": "<table><tr><td>Null Hypothesis</td><td>95% CI</td><td>p-value</td></tr><tr><td>Proposed Model (GS) vs. CRFs</td><td colspan=\"2\">5.71-9.52 < 1 \u2022 10 \u22126</td></tr><tr><td>Proposed Model (ST) vs. CRFs</td><td colspan=\"2\">5.71-9.52 < 1 \u2022 10 \u22126</td></tr><tr><td>Proposed Model (MC-SAT) vs. CRFs</td><td colspan=\"2\">5.71-9.52 < 1 \u2022 10 \u22126</td></tr></table>",
"html": null,
"type_str": "table",
"text": "McNemar's Tests on Labeling Disagreements Proposed Model (MAP/MPE) vs. CRFs 4.50-7.37 < 1 \u2022 10 \u22126",
"num": null
}
}
}
} |