File size: 175,311 Bytes
6fa4bc9 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 767 768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779 780 781 782 783 784 785 786 787 788 789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799 800 801 802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815 816 817 818 819 820 821 822 823 824 825 826 827 828 829 830 831 832 833 834 835 836 837 838 839 840 841 842 843 844 845 846 847 848 849 850 851 852 853 854 855 856 857 858 859 860 861 862 863 864 865 866 867 868 869 870 871 872 873 874 875 876 877 878 879 880 881 882 883 884 885 886 887 888 889 890 891 892 893 894 895 896 897 898 899 900 901 902 903 904 905 906 907 908 909 910 911 912 913 914 915 916 917 918 919 920 921 922 923 924 925 926 927 928 929 930 931 932 933 934 935 936 937 938 939 940 941 942 943 944 945 946 947 948 949 950 951 952 953 954 955 956 957 958 959 960 961 962 963 964 965 966 967 968 969 970 971 972 973 974 975 976 977 978 979 980 981 982 983 984 985 986 987 988 989 990 991 992 993 994 995 996 997 998 999 1000 1001 1002 1003 1004 1005 1006 1007 1008 1009 1010 1011 1012 1013 1014 1015 1016 1017 1018 1019 1020 1021 1022 1023 1024 1025 1026 1027 1028 1029 1030 1031 1032 1033 1034 1035 1036 1037 1038 1039 1040 1041 1042 1043 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 1060 1061 1062 1063 1064 1065 1066 1067 1068 1069 1070 1071 1072 1073 1074 1075 1076 1077 1078 1079 1080 1081 1082 1083 1084 1085 1086 1087 1088 1089 1090 1091 1092 1093 1094 1095 1096 1097 1098 1099 1100 1101 1102 1103 1104 1105 1106 1107 1108 1109 1110 1111 1112 1113 1114 1115 1116 1117 1118 1119 1120 1121 1122 1123 1124 1125 1126 1127 1128 1129 1130 1131 1132 1133 1134 1135 1136 1137 1138 1139 1140 1141 1142 1143 1144 1145 1146 1147 1148 1149 1150 1151 1152 1153 1154 1155 1156 1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166 1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 1181 1182 1183 1184 1185 1186 1187 1188 1189 1190 1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 1200 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 1210 1211 1212 1213 1214 1215 1216 1217 1218 1219 1220 1221 1222 1223 1224 1225 1226 1227 1228 1229 1230 1231 1232 1233 1234 1235 1236 1237 1238 1239 1240 1241 1242 1243 1244 1245 1246 1247 1248 1249 1250 1251 1252 1253 1254 1255 1256 1257 1258 1259 1260 1261 1262 1263 1264 1265 1266 1267 1268 1269 1270 1271 1272 1273 1274 1275 1276 1277 1278 1279 1280 1281 1282 1283 1284 1285 1286 1287 1288 1289 1290 1291 1292 1293 1294 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 1300 1301 1302 1303 1304 1305 1306 1307 1308 1309 1310 1311 1312 1313 1314 1315 1316 1317 1318 1319 1320 1321 1322 1323 1324 1325 1326 1327 1328 1329 1330 1331 1332 1333 1334 1335 1336 1337 1338 1339 1340 1341 1342 1343 1344 1345 1346 1347 1348 1349 1350 1351 1352 1353 1354 1355 1356 1357 1358 1359 1360 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 1401 1402 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 1408 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 1502 1503 1504 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 1512 1513 1514 1515 1516 1517 1518 1519 1520 1521 1522 1523 1524 1525 1526 1527 1528 1529 1530 1531 1532 1533 1534 1535 1536 1537 1538 1539 1540 1541 1542 1543 1544 1545 1546 1547 1548 1549 1550 1551 1552 1553 1554 1555 1556 1557 1558 1559 1560 1561 1562 1563 1564 1565 1566 1567 1568 1569 1570 1571 1572 1573 1574 1575 1576 1577 1578 1579 1580 1581 1582 1583 1584 1585 1586 1587 1588 1589 1590 1591 1592 1593 1594 1595 1596 1597 1598 1599 1600 1601 1602 1603 1604 1605 1606 1607 1608 1609 1610 1611 1612 1613 1614 1615 1616 1617 1618 1619 1620 1621 1622 1623 1624 1625 1626 1627 1628 1629 1630 1631 1632 1633 1634 1635 1636 1637 1638 1639 1640 1641 1642 1643 1644 1645 1646 1647 1648 1649 1650 1651 1652 1653 1654 1655 1656 1657 1658 1659 1660 1661 1662 1663 1664 1665 1666 1667 1668 1669 1670 1671 1672 1673 1674 1675 1676 1677 1678 1679 1680 1681 1682 1683 1684 1685 1686 1687 1688 1689 1690 1691 1692 1693 1694 1695 1696 1697 1698 1699 1700 1701 1702 1703 1704 1705 1706 1707 1708 1709 1710 1711 1712 1713 1714 1715 1716 1717 1718 1719 1720 1721 1722 1723 1724 1725 1726 1727 1728 1729 1730 1731 1732 1733 1734 1735 1736 1737 1738 1739 1740 1741 1742 1743 1744 1745 1746 1747 1748 1749 1750 1751 1752 1753 1754 1755 1756 1757 1758 1759 1760 1761 1762 1763 1764 1765 1766 1767 1768 1769 1770 1771 1772 1773 1774 1775 1776 1777 1778 1779 1780 1781 1782 1783 1784 1785 1786 1787 1788 1789 1790 1791 1792 1793 1794 1795 1796 1797 1798 1799 1800 1801 1802 1803 1804 1805 1806 1807 1808 1809 1810 1811 1812 1813 1814 1815 1816 1817 1818 1819 1820 1821 1822 1823 1824 1825 1826 1827 1828 1829 1830 1831 1832 1833 1834 1835 1836 1837 1838 1839 1840 1841 1842 1843 1844 1845 1846 1847 1848 1849 1850 1851 1852 1853 1854 1855 1856 1857 1858 1859 1860 1861 1862 1863 1864 1865 1866 1867 1868 1869 1870 1871 1872 1873 1874 1875 1876 1877 1878 1879 1880 1881 1882 1883 1884 1885 1886 1887 1888 1889 1890 1891 1892 1893 1894 1895 1896 1897 1898 1899 1900 1901 1902 1903 1904 1905 1906 1907 1908 1909 1910 1911 1912 1913 1914 1915 1916 1917 1918 1919 1920 1921 1922 1923 1924 1925 1926 1927 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 1940 1941 1942 1943 1944 1945 1946 1947 1948 1949 1950 1951 1952 1953 1954 1955 1956 1957 1958 1959 1960 1961 1962 1963 1964 1965 1966 1967 1968 1969 1970 1971 1972 1973 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 2055 2056 2057 2058 2059 2060 2061 2062 2063 2064 2065 2066 2067 2068 2069 2070 2071 2072 2073 2074 2075 2076 2077 2078 2079 2080 2081 2082 2083 2084 2085 2086 2087 2088 2089 2090 2091 2092 2093 2094 2095 2096 2097 2098 2099 2100 2101 2102 2103 2104 2105 2106 2107 2108 2109 2110 2111 2112 2113 2114 2115 2116 2117 2118 2119 2120 2121 2122 2123 2124 2125 2126 2127 2128 2129 2130 2131 2132 2133 2134 2135 2136 2137 2138 2139 2140 2141 2142 2143 2144 2145 2146 2147 2148 2149 2150 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 2170 2171 2172 2173 2174 2175 2176 2177 2178 2179 2180 2181 2182 2183 2184 2185 2186 2187 2188 2189 2190 2191 2192 2193 2194 2195 2196 2197 2198 2199 2200 2201 2202 2203 2204 2205 2206 2207 2208 2209 2210 2211 2212 2213 2214 2215 2216 2217 2218 2219 2220 2221 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2312 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 2367 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 2390 2391 2392 2393 2394 2395 2396 2397 2398 2399 2400 2401 2402 2403 2404 2405 2406 2407 2408 2409 2410 2411 2412 2413 2414 2415 2416 2417 2418 2419 2420 2421 2422 2423 2424 2425 2426 2427 2428 2429 2430 2431 2432 2433 2434 2435 2436 2437 2438 2439 2440 2441 2442 2443 2444 2445 2446 2447 2448 2449 2450 2451 2452 2453 2454 2455 2456 2457 2458 2459 2460 2461 2462 2463 2464 2465 2466 2467 2468 2469 2470 2471 2472 2473 2474 2475 2476 2477 2478 2479 2480 2481 2482 2483 2484 2485 2486 2487 2488 2489 2490 2491 2492 2493 2494 2495 2496 2497 2498 2499 2500 2501 2502 2503 2504 2505 2506 2507 2508 2509 2510 2511 2512 2513 2514 2515 2516 2517 2518 2519 2520 2521 2522 2523 2524 2525 2526 2527 2528 2529 2530 2531 2532 2533 2534 2535 2536 2537 2538 2539 2540 2541 2542 2543 2544 2545 2546 2547 2548 2549 2550 2551 2552 2553 2554 2555 2556 2557 2558 2559 2560 2561 2562 2563 2564 2565 2566 2567 2568 2569 2570 2571 2572 2573 2574 2575 2576 2577 2578 2579 2580 2581 2582 2583 2584 2585 2586 2587 2588 2589 2590 2591 2592 2593 2594 2595 2596 2597 2598 2599 2600 2601 2602 2603 2604 2605 2606 2607 2608 2609 2610 2611 2612 2613 2614 2615 2616 2617 2618 2619 2620 2621 2622 2623 2624 2625 2626 2627 2628 2629 2630 2631 2632 2633 2634 2635 2636 2637 2638 2639 2640 2641 2642 2643 2644 2645 2646 2647 2648 2649 2650 2651 2652 2653 2654 2655 2656 2657 2658 2659 2660 2661 2662 2663 2664 2665 2666 2667 2668 2669 2670 2671 2672 2673 2674 2675 2676 2677 2678 2679 2680 2681 2682 2683 2684 2685 2686 2687 2688 2689 2690 2691 2692 2693 2694 2695 2696 2697 2698 2699 2700 2701 2702 2703 2704 2705 2706 2707 2708 2709 2710 2711 2712 2713 2714 2715 2716 2717 2718 2719 2720 2721 2722 2723 2724 2725 2726 2727 2728 2729 2730 2731 2732 2733 2734 2735 2736 2737 2738 2739 2740 2741 2742 2743 2744 2745 2746 2747 2748 2749 2750 2751 2752 2753 2754 2755 2756 2757 2758 2759 2760 2761 2762 2763 2764 2765 2766 2767 2768 2769 2770 2771 2772 2773 2774 2775 2776 2777 2778 2779 2780 2781 2782 2783 2784 2785 2786 2787 2788 2789 2790 2791 2792 2793 2794 2795 2796 2797 2798 2799 2800 2801 2802 2803 2804 2805 2806 2807 2808 2809 2810 2811 2812 2813 2814 2815 2816 2817 2818 2819 2820 2821 2822 2823 2824 2825 2826 2827 2828 2829 2830 2831 2832 2833 2834 2835 2836 2837 2838 2839 2840 2841 2842 2843 2844 2845 2846 2847 2848 2849 2850 2851 2852 2853 2854 2855 2856 2857 2858 2859 2860 2861 2862 2863 2864 2865 2866 2867 2868 2869 2870 2871 2872 2873 2874 2875 2876 2877 2878 2879 2880 2881 2882 2883 2884 2885 2886 2887 2888 2889 2890 2891 2892 2893 2894 2895 2896 2897 2898 2899 2900 2901 2902 2903 2904 2905 2906 2907 2908 2909 2910 2911 2912 2913 2914 2915 2916 2917 2918 2919 2920 2921 2922 2923 2924 2925 2926 2927 2928 2929 2930 2931 2932 2933 2934 2935 2936 2937 2938 2939 2940 2941 2942 2943 2944 2945 2946 2947 2948 2949 2950 2951 2952 2953 2954 2955 2956 2957 2958 2959 2960 2961 2962 2963 2964 2965 2966 2967 2968 2969 2970 2971 2972 2973 2974 2975 2976 2977 2978 2979 2980 2981 2982 2983 2984 2985 2986 2987 2988 2989 2990 2991 2992 2993 2994 2995 2996 2997 2998 2999 3000 3001 3002 3003 3004 3005 3006 3007 3008 3009 3010 3011 3012 3013 3014 3015 3016 3017 3018 3019 3020 3021 3022 3023 3024 3025 3026 3027 3028 3029 3030 3031 3032 3033 3034 3035 3036 3037 3038 3039 3040 3041 3042 3043 3044 3045 3046 3047 3048 3049 3050 3051 3052 3053 3054 3055 3056 3057 3058 3059 3060 3061 3062 3063 3064 3065 3066 3067 3068 3069 3070 3071 3072 3073 3074 3075 3076 3077 3078 3079 3080 3081 3082 3083 3084 3085 3086 3087 3088 3089 3090 3091 3092 3093 3094 3095 3096 3097 3098 3099 3100 3101 3102 3103 3104 3105 3106 3107 3108 3109 3110 3111 3112 3113 3114 3115 3116 3117 3118 3119 3120 3121 3122 3123 3124 3125 3126 3127 3128 3129 3130 3131 3132 3133 3134 3135 3136 3137 3138 3139 3140 3141 3142 3143 3144 3145 3146 3147 3148 3149 3150 3151 3152 3153 3154 3155 3156 3157 3158 3159 3160 3161 3162 3163 3164 3165 3166 3167 3168 3169 3170 3171 3172 3173 3174 3175 3176 3177 3178 3179 3180 3181 3182 3183 3184 3185 3186 3187 3188 3189 3190 3191 3192 3193 3194 3195 3196 3197 3198 3199 3200 3201 3202 3203 3204 3205 3206 3207 3208 3209 3210 3211 3212 3213 3214 3215 3216 3217 3218 3219 3220 3221 3222 3223 3224 3225 3226 3227 3228 3229 3230 3231 3232 3233 3234 3235 3236 3237 3238 3239 3240 3241 3242 3243 3244 3245 3246 3247 3248 3249 3250 3251 3252 3253 3254 3255 3256 3257 3258 3259 3260 3261 3262 3263 3264 3265 3266 3267 3268 3269 3270 3271 3272 3273 3274 3275 3276 3277 3278 3279 3280 3281 3282 3283 3284 3285 3286 3287 3288 3289 3290 3291 3292 3293 3294 3295 3296 3297 3298 3299 3300 3301 3302 3303 3304 3305 3306 3307 3308 3309 3310 3311 3312 3313 3314 3315 3316 3317 3318 3319 3320 3321 3322 3323 3324 3325 3326 3327 3328 3329 3330 3331 3332 3333 3334 3335 3336 3337 3338 3339 3340 3341 3342 3343 3344 3345 3346 3347 3348 3349 3350 3351 3352 3353 3354 3355 3356 3357 3358 3359 3360 3361 3362 3363 3364 3365 3366 3367 3368 3369 3370 3371 3372 3373 3374 3375 3376 3377 3378 3379 3380 3381 3382 3383 3384 3385 3386 3387 3388 3389 3390 3391 3392 3393 3394 3395 3396 3397 3398 3399 3400 3401 3402 3403 3404 3405 3406 3407 3408 3409 3410 3411 3412 3413 3414 3415 3416 3417 3418 3419 3420 3421 3422 3423 3424 3425 3426 3427 3428 3429 3430 3431 3432 3433 3434 3435 3436 3437 3438 3439 3440 3441 3442 3443 3444 3445 3446 3447 3448 3449 3450 3451 3452 3453 3454 3455 3456 3457 3458 3459 3460 3461 3462 3463 3464 3465 3466 3467 3468 3469 3470 3471 3472 3473 3474 3475 3476 3477 3478 3479 3480 3481 3482 3483 3484 3485 3486 3487 3488 3489 3490 3491 3492 3493 3494 3495 3496 3497 3498 3499 3500 3501 3502 3503 3504 3505 3506 3507 3508 3509 3510 3511 3512 3513 3514 3515 3516 3517 3518 3519 3520 3521 3522 3523 3524 3525 3526 3527 3528 3529 3530 3531 3532 3533 3534 3535 3536 3537 3538 3539 3540 3541 3542 3543 3544 3545 3546 3547 3548 3549 3550 3551 3552 3553 3554 3555 3556 3557 3558 3559 3560 3561 3562 3563 3564 3565 3566 3567 3568 3569 3570 3571 3572 3573 3574 3575 3576 3577 3578 3579 3580 3581 3582 3583 3584 3585 3586 3587 3588 3589 3590 3591 3592 3593 3594 3595 3596 3597 3598 3599 3600 3601 3602 3603 3604 3605 3606 3607 3608 3609 3610 3611 3612 3613 3614 3615 3616 3617 3618 3619 3620 3621 3622 3623 3624 3625 3626 3627 3628 3629 3630 3631 3632 3633 3634 3635 3636 3637 3638 3639 3640 3641 3642 3643 3644 3645 3646 3647 3648 3649 3650 3651 3652 3653 3654 3655 3656 3657 3658 3659 3660 3661 3662 3663 3664 3665 3666 3667 3668 3669 3670 3671 3672 3673 3674 3675 3676 3677 3678 3679 3680 3681 3682 3683 3684 3685 3686 3687 3688 3689 3690 3691 3692 3693 3694 3695 3696 3697 3698 3699 3700 3701 3702 3703 3704 3705 3706 3707 3708 3709 3710 3711 3712 3713 3714 3715 3716 3717 3718 3719 3720 3721 3722 3723 3724 3725 3726 3727 3728 3729 3730 3731 3732 3733 3734 3735 |
{
"paper_id": "2021",
"header": {
"generated_with": "S2ORC 1.0.0",
"date_generated": "2023-01-19T02:10:15.211044Z"
},
"title": "Argumentation Mining in Scientific Literature for Sustainable Development",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Aris",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fergadis",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {
"laboratory": "",
"institution": "National Technical University of Athens",
"location": {}
},
"email": "aris.fergadis@athenarc.gr"
},
{
"first": "Dimitris",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pappas",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Antonia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Karamolegkou",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
},
{
"first": "Haris",
"middle": [],
"last": "Papageorgiou",
"suffix": "",
"affiliation": {},
"email": ""
}
],
"year": "",
"venue": null,
"identifiers": {},
"abstract": "Science, technology and innovation (STI) policies have evolved in the past decade. We are now progressing towards policies that are more aligned with sustainable development through integrating social, economic and environmental dimensions. In this new policy environment, the need to keep track of innovation from its conception in Science and Research has emerged. Argumentation mining, an interdisciplinary NLP field, gives rise to the required technologies. In this study, we present the first STI-driven multidisciplinary corpus of scientific abstracts annotated for argumentative units (AUs) on the sustainable development goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations (UN). AUs are the sentences conveying the Claim(s) reported in the author's original research and the Evidence provided for support. We also present a set of strong, BERT-based neural baselines achieving an f1-score of 70.0 for Claim and 62.4 for Evidence identification evaluated with 10-fold cross-validation. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our models, we experiment with different test sets showing comparable performance across various SDG policy domains. Our dataset and models are publicly available for research purposes 1 .",
"pdf_parse": {
"paper_id": "2021",
"_pdf_hash": "",
"abstract": [
{
"text": "Science, technology and innovation (STI) policies have evolved in the past decade. We are now progressing towards policies that are more aligned with sustainable development through integrating social, economic and environmental dimensions. In this new policy environment, the need to keep track of innovation from its conception in Science and Research has emerged. Argumentation mining, an interdisciplinary NLP field, gives rise to the required technologies. In this study, we present the first STI-driven multidisciplinary corpus of scientific abstracts annotated for argumentative units (AUs) on the sustainable development goals (SDGs) set by the United Nations (UN). AUs are the sentences conveying the Claim(s) reported in the author's original research and the Evidence provided for support. We also present a set of strong, BERT-based neural baselines achieving an f1-score of 70.0 for Claim and 62.4 for Evidence identification evaluated with 10-fold cross-validation. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our models, we experiment with different test sets showing comparable performance across various SDG policy domains. Our dataset and models are publicly available for research purposes 1 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Abstract",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"body_text": [
{
"text": "Arguments are the fundamental building blocks (i.e., groups of statements) in the reasoning path from assumptions to conclusions. Argumentation mining (AM 2 ) is becoming increasingly a popular topic that addresses the issue of converting unstructured text into structured argument data (Green et al., 2014; Cardie et al., 2015; Reed, 2016; Slonim and Aharonov, 2018; Stein and Wachsmuth, 2019) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 287,
"end": 307,
"text": "(Green et al., 2014;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF17"
},
{
"start": 308,
"end": 328,
"text": "Cardie et al., 2015;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF10"
},
{
"start": 329,
"end": 340,
"text": "Reed, 2016;",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 341,
"end": 367,
"text": "Slonim and Aharonov, 2018;",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 368,
"end": 394,
"text": "Stein and Wachsmuth, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF49"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "AM datasets have been developed in various domains such as legal collections (Mochales and 1 https://github.com/afergadis/SciARK 2 Both argument and argumentation mining terms are used in the literature.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 77,
"end": 92,
"text": "(Mochales and 1",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Introduction",
"sec_num": "1"
},
{
"text": "The present results support the need for prompt and substantial emission cuts in order to slow down future sea-level rise and implement adaptation measures.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Lower bounds to future sea-level rise",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We find that, in spite of fossil-fuel depletion, sea level is predicted to rise by at least ~80cm at the end of this century and is expected to continue rising for at least the next two hundred years.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Lower bounds to future sea-level rise",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Figure 1: Example of an annotated paper. The authors (Zecca and Chiari, 2012) claim that a substantial emission cut is needed to slow down sea-level rise. The evidence they provide is the result of their method that predicts a continued rising for at least the next two hundred years. Ieven, 2009; Savelka and Ashley, 2016; Yamada et al., 2017) , political debate fora (Walker et al., 2012; Abbott et al., 2016) , persuasive essays (Stab and Gurevych, 2014; Carlile et al., 2018) , biomedical publications (Wilbur et al., 2006; Blake, 2010; Achakulvisut et al., 2019; Mayer et al., 2020) , newspapers, blogs, and the social web (Goudas et al., 2015; Kiesel et al., 2015; . These datasets facilitate practical applications of argumentation mining such as supporting sensemaking (Schneider, 2014) , practical reasoning (Walton, 2015) , argument retrieval (Rastegar-Mojarad et al., 2016) , sentiment analysis (Liu et al., 2017) , and claim verification (Thorne et al., 2018; Wadden et al., 2020) . We present a novel AM framework streamlining evidence-informed policy making.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 53,
"end": 77,
"text": "(Zecca and Chiari, 2012)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF60"
},
{
"start": 285,
"end": 297,
"text": "Ieven, 2009;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF34"
},
{
"start": 298,
"end": 323,
"text": "Savelka and Ashley, 2016;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF41"
},
{
"start": 324,
"end": 344,
"text": "Yamada et al., 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF58"
},
{
"start": 369,
"end": 390,
"text": "(Walker et al., 2012;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF55"
},
{
"start": 391,
"end": 411,
"text": "Abbott et al., 2016)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF0"
},
{
"start": 432,
"end": 457,
"text": "(Stab and Gurevych, 2014;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF46"
},
{
"start": 458,
"end": 479,
"text": "Carlile et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF11"
},
{
"start": 506,
"end": 527,
"text": "(Wilbur et al., 2006;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF57"
},
{
"start": 528,
"end": 540,
"text": "Blake, 2010;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 541,
"end": 567,
"text": "Achakulvisut et al., 2019;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 568,
"end": 587,
"text": "Mayer et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
},
{
"start": 628,
"end": 649,
"text": "(Goudas et al., 2015;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF16"
},
{
"start": 650,
"end": 670,
"text": "Kiesel et al., 2015;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF23"
},
{
"start": 777,
"end": 794,
"text": "(Schneider, 2014)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF42"
},
{
"start": 817,
"end": 831,
"text": "(Walton, 2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF56"
},
{
"start": 853,
"end": 884,
"text": "(Rastegar-Mojarad et al., 2016)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF38"
},
{
"start": 906,
"end": 924,
"text": "(Liu et al., 2017)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF29"
},
{
"start": 950,
"end": 971,
"text": "(Thorne et al., 2018;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF50"
},
{
"start": 972,
"end": 992,
"text": "Wadden et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF54"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Claim",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly on 25th of September 2015 3 set 17 interlinked SDGs and 169 targets to \"...stimulate action over the next 15 years in areas of critical importance for humanity and the planet\". In this context, policy makers and public administrators seek evidence-based scientific claims assisting the formulation of optimal STI policy for achieving the sustainable path of development. To this end, we construct SciARK, a novel multidisciplinary dataset with abstracts of scientific publications related to six Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the United Nations (UN). SciARK abstracts are annotated for their Argument Units, i.e., sentences in which the authors state their Claims and the Evidence to support them. We present such an example in Figure 1 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 788,
"end": 796,
"text": "Figure 1",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Claim",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "The term Claim in SciARK refers to the main findings reported in the authors' original research and usually coincides with the conclusions. In addition, we use the term Evidence for the sentences that refer to particular kinds of arguments, such as those based on observations, factual findings, statistics, experimental tests or other scientific findings. Implicitly, all the relations are Supporting, and we justify our decision in Section 3.1. We develop end-to-end neural baselines on SciARK, showing that all baselines can benefit from training on a diverse set of SDG policy domains 4 . The major contributions of this paper can be summarised as follows:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Claim",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "1. We introduce a novel STI-driven multidisciplinary dataset with argumentation annotation. The dataset covers six of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals of United Nations covering a wide range of sustainability aspects, from Climate to Clean Energy to Health and well-being to Gender equality and responsible consumption and production.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Claim",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "2. We formalise and develop an annotation protocol assuring quality by accounting for different groups of annotators curating publications in different domains.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Claim",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "3. We interpret the magnitude of inter-annotator agreement following the Cumulative Probability approach (Gwet, 2014), instead of a simple scale matching.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Claim",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "4. We provide three strong modern deep learning baselines addressing the claim/evidence extraction as a classification task, showing their effectiveness in a diverse set of sustainability domains.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Claim",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We demonstrate the capacity of our models and dataset in tackling unseen SDG domains.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Compared to previous domain-specific approaches, our best model can handle snippets of claims and evidence in a broad spectrum of SDG domains.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "5.",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "A large number of annotated datasets has been released for argumentation mining in various domains (Lawrence and Reed, 2019) . Many researchers approach the claim annotation task under the prism of functional roles (Blake, 2010; Alamri and Stevenson, 2016) or ownership (Lauscher et al., 2018; Mayer et al., 2020) . Evidence annotation has analogous categorisation, ranging from its strength (Wilbur et al., 2006; Shatkay et al., 2008) to reproduction and generalisation (Mayer et al., 2018) . However, it is not always possible to apply these fine-grained differentiations to other domains. Recently, researchers employed argumentative schemes that incorporate both argumentative units and their relationships. The most common argumentative relationships employed are the \"support\" and \"attack\" ones (Peldszus and Stede, 2013; Mayer et al., 2020) . Researchers also adapt additional relation types from Rhetorical Structure Theory (Mann and Thompson, 1988) such as \"semantically same\" (Lauscher et al., 2018) , \"detail\", \"sequence\" (Kirschner et al., 2015) , and \"additional\" (Accuosto and Saggion, 2019) . Although those fine-grained relation types are of great value, their presence in the context of a scientific abstract is limited.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 99,
"end": 124,
"text": "(Lawrence and Reed, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF27"
},
{
"start": 215,
"end": 228,
"text": "(Blake, 2010;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 229,
"end": 256,
"text": "Alamri and Stevenson, 2016)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 270,
"end": 293,
"text": "(Lauscher et al., 2018;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
},
{
"start": 294,
"end": 313,
"text": "Mayer et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
},
{
"start": 392,
"end": 413,
"text": "(Wilbur et al., 2006;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF57"
},
{
"start": 414,
"end": 435,
"text": "Shatkay et al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF43"
},
{
"start": 471,
"end": 491,
"text": "(Mayer et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF32"
},
{
"start": 801,
"end": 827,
"text": "(Peldszus and Stede, 2013;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF36"
},
{
"start": 828,
"end": 847,
"text": "Mayer et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
},
{
"start": 932,
"end": 957,
"text": "(Mann and Thompson, 1988)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF31"
},
{
"start": 986,
"end": 1009,
"text": "(Lauscher et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
},
{
"start": 1033,
"end": 1057,
"text": "(Kirschner et al., 2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
},
{
"start": 1077,
"end": 1105,
"text": "(Accuosto and Saggion, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "The most recent methods for the AU classification task leverage neural networks architectures. A common architecture is the one comprising a BiL-STM layer followed by a CRF layer for sequence tagging (Achakulvisut et al., 2019; Accuosto and Saggion, 2019) . Mayer et al. (2020) evaluate many different neural network models and shows that those based on Transformers have better performance on the AU extraction and the relation classification tasks. The before mentioned models classify sequences of words within a AU ignoring the context before and after the AU. We experiment with Transformers and BiLSTM layers taking advantage of the context of AUs.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 200,
"end": 227,
"text": "(Achakulvisut et al., 2019;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 228,
"end": 255,
"text": "Accuosto and Saggion, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "Most of the datasets based on scientific literature are domain specific with strong emphasis on the biomedical domain (Blake, 2010; Alamri and Stevenson, 2016; Achakulvisut et al., 2019; Mayer et al., 2020) . Other domains are educa-tion (Kirschner et al., 2015) , computer graphics (Lauscher et al., 2018) , and computational linguistics (Accuosto and Saggion, 2019) . SciARK, as a multidisciplinary dataset, includes abstract from biomedical, social, environmental and other domains.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 118,
"end": 131,
"text": "(Blake, 2010;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF9"
},
{
"start": 132,
"end": 159,
"text": "Alamri and Stevenson, 2016;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF4"
},
{
"start": 160,
"end": 186,
"text": "Achakulvisut et al., 2019;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF2"
},
{
"start": 187,
"end": 206,
"text": "Mayer et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
},
{
"start": 238,
"end": 262,
"text": "(Kirschner et al., 2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
},
{
"start": 283,
"end": 306,
"text": "(Lauscher et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
},
{
"start": 339,
"end": 367,
"text": "(Accuosto and Saggion, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Related Work",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "A popular schema in argumentation mining application is Toulmin's model (Lytos et al., 2019) . Toulmin (1958) defines the functional roles of datum, claim, warrant, backing, qualifiers, and rebuttal. We use a subset of functional roles, comprising datum and claim, as a scheme for annotating our corpus (Lauscher et al., 2018; Stede and Schneider, 2019) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 72,
"end": 92,
"text": "(Lytos et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF30"
},
{
"start": 95,
"end": 109,
"text": "Toulmin (1958)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF53"
},
{
"start": 303,
"end": 326,
"text": "(Lauscher et al., 2018;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
},
{
"start": 327,
"end": 353,
"text": "Stede and Schneider, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF48"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation Schema",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Arguments due to their pragmatic nature can be expressed by a variety of forms and linguistic cues. This is why there have been efforts to classify the two basic argument components, claim and evidence, into further categories. Blake 2010introduced a Claim Framework distinguishing five claim categories, but they found that the majority of the claims in a corpus of scientific publications were explicit claims. Similarly, Mayer et al. (2018) suggest fine-grained evidence categories, but they do not use those in their extended dataset (Mayer et al., 2020) . Regarding argument relations, there have been also attempts to distinguish them into supporting and attacking. However, Accuosto and Saggion (2019) did not found any attack relation in 60 abstracts of the SciDTB corpus (Yang and Li, 2018) . Also, Lauscher et al. (2018) and Mayer et al. (2020) found that the number of attacking relations in full papers and abstracts is relatively low.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 424,
"end": 443,
"text": "Mayer et al. (2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF32"
},
{
"start": 538,
"end": 558,
"text": "(Mayer et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
},
{
"start": 780,
"end": 799,
"text": "(Yang and Li, 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF59"
},
{
"start": 808,
"end": 830,
"text": "Lauscher et al. (2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF26"
},
{
"start": 835,
"end": 854,
"text": "Mayer et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation Schema",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Based on the reported studies and the context of our corpus, we choose to keep our annotation schema simple. We focus on the kernel of an argument that is the Evidence and the Claim without further categorisation. Our argumentative units are sentences, a decision following Kirschner et al. (2015) , and supported by Accuosto and Saggion (2019) that report 93% of argumentative units in their corpus coincide with the boundaries of the sentences. Implicitly, a supportive relation holds between Evidence and Claim.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 274,
"end": 297,
"text": "Kirschner et al. (2015)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF24"
},
{
"start": 317,
"end": 344,
"text": "Accuosto and Saggion (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF1"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation Schema",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "In SciARK, we define Argument, Claim and Evidence, in the context of scientific abstract, as follows:",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation Schema",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Argument: a set of statements with two different SDG Annotators Abstracts 3 6 300 5 5 255 7 3 a 61 10 3 a 70 12 3 a 52 13 6 262 Total 20 1000",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 64,
"end": 146,
"text": "Abstracts 3 6 300 5 5 255 7 3 a 61 10 3 a 70 12 3 a 52 13 6 262",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation Schema",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "a The same annotators in SDGs 7, 10 and 12. categories: Claim and Evidence.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation Schema",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Claim: an argumentative statement that reports the study findings and derives from the author's original work.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation Schema",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Evidence: statement that reports observations, statistical findings, and experimental results used to support a claim.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotation Schema",
"sec_num": "3.1"
},
{
"text": "Our dataset is the first one that connects Policy Targets and Scientific Literature. In SDGs, we find specific targets defined by policymakers to deliver a more sustainable, prosperous and peaceful global future. We collect (a small part of) the scientific literature that provides scientific arguments related to real policy targets. To formulate the policy targets, we leverage the definition of the SDG targets and their indicators as keyterms (Duran-Silva et al., 2019) for searching in publisher's portals and scientific literature search engines (e.g., PubMed, Semantic Scholar etc.). The keyterms we use are from the SDGs 3 (good health and well-being), 5 (gender equality), 7 (affordable and clean energy), 10 (reduce inequalities), 12 (responsible consumption and production), and 13 (climate action). Examples of such keywords are: (Neonatal OR Maternal) Mortality, Female Genital Mutilation, Clean (Fuels OR Fossil-Fuel Technology), (Climate OR Natural Disaster) Resilience, etc. We use the term domain to group abstracts under policy targets as described in SDGs targets. So, all the abstracts we gather using keyterms from the SDG5 targets, form the SDG5 policy domain, and so on. In Table 1 , we present the number of abstracts collected per policy domain. ",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 1197,
"end": 1204,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Data Collection",
"sec_num": "3.2"
},
{
"text": "SciARK consists of 1,000 abstracts with 12,374 sentences, 1,202 sentences annotated as Claim and 1,915 annotated as Evidence. On average, per abstract, 1.2 sentences are annotated as Claim and 1.92 sentences as Evidence.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Exploratory Data Analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "To investigate the position of the Claim and Evidence categories within the abstracts, we calculate the relative position for each sentence. The first sentence is in relative position 0 and the last in position 1. Figure 2 depicts the positions of the categories displaying the histograms of the two argumentative units. A Claim is located mainly in the last sentences. Specifically, about 40% of the total claims are in the last sentence and about 80% in the [0.9 \u2212 1] range. That is expected for scientific abstracts because usually, the claim coincides with the conclusions, which are the last sentences of an abstract.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 214,
"end": 222,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Exploratory Data Analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "The Evidence category lies in the middle to the end of the abstracts. We find the Evidence category in the range [0.8 \u2212 1] with a percentage of about 33% and about 62% in the range [0.5 \u2212 0.8) where, usually, we find the results and their analysis. These findings serve as a baseline for SciARK evaluation in Section 5.2. Figure 2 shows that the most common pattern of the argument structure is the one that Claim follows the Evidence. .705 .553 Table 3 : Annotator assessment coefficients (\u03ba \u03b1i ). Each cell represents an annotator and the allocation represents the annotator distribution to each SDG. Pereira, 2004) or the CONSORT format (Hopewell et al., 2008) that instruct the discussion/conclusions to be at the end of the abstract.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 603,
"end": 617,
"text": "Pereira, 2004)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF45"
},
{
"start": 640,
"end": 663,
"text": "(Hopewell et al., 2008)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF21"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 322,
"end": 330,
"text": "Figure 2",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 446,
"end": 453,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Exploratory Data Analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "4 Assessing Agreement",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Exploratory Data Analysis",
"sec_num": "3.3"
},
{
"text": "The task of annotating such abstract constructs as the argumentative units is quite challenging (Lippi and Torroni, 2016) . Also, our multidisciplinary corpus requires experts from a variety of scientific domains, which was beyond our scope. Twenty postgraduate students with background in engineering, economics, and applied sciences, provided annotations (Table 1) in a distributed fashion. The annotators selected the SDGs that were more familiar with and felt more comfortable to work on. Each annotator worked independently on an average of 150 abstracts, and three annotators annotated each abstract. Annotators should categorise all the sentences in an abstract into one of the mutually exclusive categories: Claim, Evidence, or Neither. We used MACE (Hovy et al., 2013) and majority vote between all annotator triplets to get category predictions. The predictions of MACE and the majority vote output were identical.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 96,
"end": 121,
"text": "(Lippi and Torroni, 2016)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF28"
},
{
"start": 758,
"end": 777,
"text": "(Hovy et al., 2013)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF22"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 357,
"end": 366,
"text": "(Table 1)",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotators",
"sec_num": "4.1"
},
{
"text": "In tasks which incorporate a large number of annotators or use crowd-sourcing, one needs to have methods to filter out biased annotators. To assess",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Annotator Assessment",
"sec_num": "4.2"
},
{
"text": "Substantial [0.6 -0.8) Moderate [0.4 -0.6) Corpus (\u03ba = .669) 88% 100% Claim (\u03ba C = .730) 100% Evidence (\u03ba E = .637) 13% 100% Neither (\u03ba N = .664)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Strength of Agreement",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "82% 100% Table 4 : Estimated agreement coefficient interpretation using the cumulative probability approach (Gwet, 2014) on the Landis-Koch scale (Landis and Koch, 1977) . Using the simple match to the benchmark, all kappa values are interpreted as Substantial.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 146,
"end": 169,
"text": "(Landis and Koch, 1977)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 9,
"end": 16,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Strength of Agreement",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "the reliability of the annotators we use the Annotator \u03ba (Toledo et al., 2019) as an annotator quality control coefficient. This metric is calculated as the average of all pairwise agreement for each annotator. Toledo et al. (2019) use Equation 1 to calculate the Annotator \u03ba of an annotator i",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 57,
"end": 78,
"text": "(Toledo et al., 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF52"
},
{
"start": 211,
"end": 231,
"text": "Toledo et al. (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF52"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Strength of Agreement",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "\u03ba \u03b1 i = n j=1,j =i F (i, j) N i (1)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Strength of Agreement",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "where n is the total number of annotators, F (i, j) is the pairwise Fleiss' \u03ba between annotators i, j, and N i the number of annotator pairs that the annotator i is a member. The rationale of this metric is that an annotator who systematically disagrees will have all pairwise scores low and consequently a low \u03ba \u03b1 value. The opposite holds for a reliable annotator. Table 3 shows the values we calculate on our corpus. Each row \u03ba \u03b1 i , i \u2208 [1, 6] corresponds to an annotator who worked on an SDG. Annotator \u03ba \u03b1 1 in SDG3, is a different person than annotator \u03ba \u03b1 1 in SDG5. Some rows have empty values because there were fewer than 6 annotators. The table follows the allocation we present in Table 1 .",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 367,
"end": 374,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": null
},
{
"start": 694,
"end": 701,
"text": "Table 1",
"ref_id": "TABREF0"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Strength of Agreement",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We expect to capture biased annotators as outliers in the columns of Table 3 . Toledo et al. (2019) use the value .35 as a threshold to discard annotators with lower Annotator \u03ba values. In our case, all annotators achieve a satisfactory average pair-wise agreement, despite the difficulty of the task and the lack of expertise in every domain.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 79,
"end": 99,
"text": "Toledo et al. (2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF52"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 69,
"end": 76,
"text": "Table 3",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Strength of Agreement",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Fleiss' \u03ba (Fleiss, 1971) was run to estimate the magnitude of agreement between annotators resulting 5 in \u03ba F =.669 (95% Confidence Interval (CI), .658 to .681), Standard Error (SE) .006, p < .001.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "To further investigate the difficulties of the annotation task, we calculate the level of agreement on each of the three categories computing the individual kappa values. The individual kappas are simply Fleiss' \u03ba calculated for each of the categories separately against all other categories combined. The Claim category has an estimated level of agreement equal to \u03ba C =.730 (95% CI, .713 to .746), SE .009, p < .001. Agreement for the Evidence category is equal to \u03ba E =.637 (95% CI, .622 to .652), SE .008, p < .001, and for the Neither category \u03ba N =.664 (95% CI, .652 to .676), SE .006, p < .001. The results are statistically significant and show an agreement above the agreement expected by chance.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "Many benchmark scales (Landis and Koch, 1977; Cicchetti and Sparrow, 1981; Altman, 1990; Regier et al., 2013) aim to interpret the magnitude of agreement using the inter-annotator agreement coefficients. Usually, this is done by simple matching the calculated coefficient value within a benchmark range and report the corresponding interpretation.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 22,
"end": 45,
"text": "(Landis and Koch, 1977;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
},
{
"start": 46,
"end": 74,
"text": "Cicchetti and Sparrow, 1981;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF12"
},
{
"start": 75,
"end": 88,
"text": "Altman, 1990;",
"ref_id": "BIBREF5"
},
{
"start": 89,
"end": 109,
"text": "Regier et al., 2013)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF40"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "However, Gwet (2014) demonstrated that this approach is highly optimistic for the characterisation of the agreement. Thus, Gwet recommends the \"Cumulative Probability\" approach, a probabilistic process that takes into account the standard error to calculate the likelihood that a coefficient falls into the benchmark range of values. Using the Landis-Koch scale (Landis and Koch, 1977) and the Cumulative Probability approach (Gwet, 2014), we report 6 our interpretation in Table 4 . The results indicate that the likelihood of our corpus to fall into the substantial range of values is 88%. Also, the results show that the agreement can be characterised as moderate with a likelihood of 100%. Claim agreement is substantial with a likelihood of 100%, while the Evidence category is harder for the annotators as we have a moderate agreement (only 13% likelihood of substantial agreement).",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 362,
"end": 385,
"text": "(Landis and Koch, 1977)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF25"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 474,
"end": 481,
"text": "Table 4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "The Claim category is usually found in the concluding sentences of the abstract. Also, we find strong discourse markers introducing the claim, such as \"overall, this study reveals that\", \"in conclusion, these findings confirm\", \"the data suggest that\" etc. The above observations mainly explain the substantial agreement on the Claim category. Context Encoder",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "\u2022 \u2022 \u2022 s 1 s m Sentence Encoder s 1 s m \u2022 \u2022 \u2022 w 11 w 1n w m1",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "w mn which the authors express possibility (may) or opinion (\"we propose/suggest/believe\"). Our annotation protocol is to avoid annotating such sentences as Claim unless there are no other declarative sentences baring the claim and there are sentences that provide evidence to support the claim.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "Sentences annotated as Evidence do not have such strong discourse markers as those found for the Claim. For the Evidence category, annotators had to choose mostly between sentences that report experimental results or observations. The instructions to the annotators were to select the minimum number of sentences that provide enough support to the Claim. We pose this restriction to avoid the case to categorise as Evidence every sentence reporting results. The increased number of candidate sentences and the restriction mentioned are the main reasons that explain the level of agreement for the Evidence category.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "Finally, the agreement on the Neither category is affected by the Evidence category and is characterised as moderate but with a likelihood of 82% to be substantial. Overall, we show that the strength of agreement in our corpus is moderate above chance and with a very high probability can be characterised as substantial.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Inter-Annotator Agreement",
"sec_num": "4.3"
},
{
"text": "We formulate the argumentation units classification as a Sentence Sequence Tagging task within the context of the abstract. In Figure 3 , our SciARK architecture is depicted encompassing three layers: a) the Sentence Encoder, b) Context Encoder, and c) a Fully Connected layer.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 127,
"end": 135,
"text": "Figure 3",
"ref_id": "FIGREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Setup",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "The input of the Sentence Encoder is a matrix A \u2208 R m\u00d7n that represents an abstract A with m sentences of n words each. We set m = 20 and n = 40, values representing 90% of the corpus in the number of sentences and number of words in a sentence, respectively. In cases where the sentences of an abstract exceed the limit, we truncate the sentences in the beginning. The truncated sentences get the Neither label.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Setup",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "The output is a sentence vector s \u2208 R d , where d is the output dimensionality of the layer. A Context Encoder layer updates each sentence vector s utilising the context, before and after, each sentence to a new vector s \u2208 R d . Finally, a Fully Connected layer classifies each sentence as Evidence, Claim, or Neither.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Setup",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "We implement the architecture in Figure 3 as a SciBERT -BiLSTM model. The uncased version of the SciBERT (Beltagy et al., 2019 ) model serves as a Sentence Encoder. We use the [CLS] token of each sentence from the SciBERT, a sentence vector s \u2208 R 728 , as input to the Context Encoder. To implement the Context Encoder layer, we use a bidirectional LSTM. We set the LSTM layer size to 64 with 0.3 forward and backward dropout. The values were selected by testing all the combinations of the following hyper-parameters: LSTM units 32, 64 and 128, forward and backward dropout 0.1, 0.3 and 0.5. Thus, the output of the Context Encoder is a vector s \u2208 R 128 . Also, we experiment by replacing the SciBERT with an uncased BERT-base model (Devlin et al., 2018) keeping the same hyperparameters.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 105,
"end": 126,
"text": "(Beltagy et al., 2019",
"ref_id": "BIBREF7"
},
{
"start": 734,
"end": 755,
"text": "(Devlin et al., 2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF13"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 33,
"end": 41,
"text": "Figure 3",
"ref_id": "FIGREF2"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Setup",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "As a last variation in our architecture, we replace SciBERT with a BiLSTM. The Sentence Encoder BiLSTM layer encodes the word embeddings of a sentence to a sentence vector using attention.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Setup",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "As word embeddings, we use 200-dimensional pre-trained Glove embeddings 7 (Pennington et al., 2014) with Gaussian noise sampled from a zeromean distribution with \u03c3 = 0.1. The LSTM layer Table 5 : The baseline and the performance of neural network models on SciARK calculated with 10-fold cross-validation. size is 64 with 0.3 forward and backward dropout. Follows a dropout layer with 0.4 and an attention layer which outputs a 128 dimensional sentence vector, s \u2208 R 128 . We also tested all combinations with 200 and 300-dimensional vectors, \u03c3 \u2208 [0.1, 0.2] and dropout 0.2, 0.3, 0.4 and 0.5.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 74,
"end": 99,
"text": "(Pennington et al., 2014)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF37"
}
],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 186,
"end": 193,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Setup",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "To validate the contribution of the Context Encoder layer of our architecture, we present results of a) an intuitive baseline, b) a SciBERT model as Sentence Encoder only, and c) the SciBERT-GRU-CRF model of Mayer et al. (2020) .",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 208,
"end": 227,
"text": "Mayer et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Setup",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "The baseline utilises the observations presented in Section 3.3. For the baseline all sentences that have a relative position within an abstract in the range [0.5\u22120.8) are categorised as Evidence, those in the range [0.8 \u2212 1] as Claim and the rest as Neither. Finally, the SciBERT-GRU-CRF model of Mayer et al. (2020) gave the best results in the multi-class sequence tagging task on their dataset (AbstRCT). Since the model classifies spans of text using the BIO format, instead of sentence, we do the following modifications. If a sentence has a Claim or Evidence category, the first token of the sentence gets the B-Claim/Evidence label and all the rest the I-Clam/Evidence label. All other sentences get an O label on every token. To get a category for a sentence, we take the most common label of all tokens of the sentence.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 298,
"end": 317,
"text": "Mayer et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Setup",
"sec_num": "5.1"
},
{
"text": "We present the results of the models described in Table 5 . All results, expect the ones of the Baseline, are calculated using 10-fold cross-validation on our dataset using 20% of the training set for validation.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 50,
"end": 57,
"text": "Table 5",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "The Baseline has the best recall in both categories which is expected since for each abstract 30% of the sentences are categorised as Evidence and 20% as Claim. On the other hand, this method has the lowest precision. From the neural network models, the SciBERT -BiLSTM model has the most balanced performance with the highest f1-score in both categories and the best precision on the Claim category. Also, the results highlight the contribution of the Context Encoder comparing to the plain Sentence Encoder (SciBERT). The model of Mayer et al. (2020) does not seem to benefit from the CRF layer because the classification spans are sentences and their model does not utilise the context before and after the classified sentence.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 533,
"end": 552,
"text": "Mayer et al. (2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "In Table 6 we present the confusion matrix with the predictions of the SciBERT -BiLSTM model. The results show that the model has a good discrimination between the two argumentative categories. Most misclassified Claim and Evidence sentences get the Neither category. The results overall are very promising taking into account the conceptual difficulty of the task and the variety of the policy domains in the dataset.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 3,
"end": 10,
"text": "Table 6",
"ref_id": "TABREF5"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Results",
"sec_num": "5.2"
},
{
"text": "We utilise the multidisciplinary characteristic of our dataset to experiment on a cross-domain task, holding successively one SDG policy domain exclusively as a test set, similarly to Stab et al. (2018) . With this experiment, we expect to get results showing that models benefit from the diversity of the dataset and generalise to new policy domains, comparing with a fixed one. We use AbstRCT (Mayer et al., 2020) , a corpus of randomised control trials, as a fixed dataset that is comparable to the size of our dataset, is on scientific abstracts and has Claim and Evidence annotations.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 184,
"end": 202,
"text": "Stab et al. (2018)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF47"
},
{
"start": 395,
"end": 415,
"text": "(Mayer et al., 2020)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF33"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Generalising to New Policy Domains",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "The experiment has two phases. On the first one, the SciBERT-BiLSTM model is trained on the five of the SDG domains and is tested on the sixth. On the second one, the model is trained on AbstRCT and successively tested on each SDG domain.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Generalising to New Policy Domains",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "In Figure 4 we present our results on the Claim and Evidence identification. The results clearly show that the model has better scores with the SciARK dataset. The imbalance of the dataset (Table 1), the different argument structure (Table 2) , and the domains distinct characteristics are the main reasons that explain the variability of the results.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 3,
"end": 11,
"text": "Figure 4",
"ref_id": "FIGREF3"
},
{
"start": 233,
"end": 242,
"text": "(Table 2)",
"ref_id": "TABREF1"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Generalising to New Policy Domains",
"sec_num": "5.3"
},
{
"text": "In this section, we discuss some of the erroneous predictions of our model. All possible misclassifications are: Neither to Claim/Evidence, Claim to Evidence/Neither, and Evidence to Claim/Neither. In Table 7 we present at least one misclassification, from each combination, in their context in order to better understand the type of errors. A common source of errors, for both argumentation categories, are the discourse markers discussed in Section 4.3. The example sentences 2, 6 and 10 have common claim discourse markers but in the context of those abstracts, other sentences bare the author's claim. Another source of errors are when the authors express possibility (may) or opinion (\"we propose/suggest/beleive\"). Annotators should categorise those sentences as Claim if there is no other declarative one that has a claim. Two examples of such sentences that the model predicted as Claim, are 12 and 15.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [
{
"start": 201,
"end": 208,
"text": "Table 7",
"ref_id": "TABREF8"
}
],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Discussion",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "The model selects sentences for the Evidence category mainly from those that report results. However, as we mentioned in Section 4.3, the instruction to the annotators was to select the minimum sentences that support the claim. Following the instruction, annotators find that sentences 1, 4 and 8 are surplus. However, the model predicted those as Evidence because of their position on the abstract and the fact that they report results.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Discussion",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Finally, to highlight the difficulty of the task we discuss abstract #3. Sentence 11 has a claim that \"under-five mortality rate is a serious problem\". Although from the general knowledge of our world we recognise the statement as a claim, in the abstract there is no sentence to support it. On the other hand, the claim that \"the hazard of underfive mortality has a decreasing pattern in years\" is supported by sentence 10.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Discussion",
"sec_num": "6"
},
{
"text": "Argumentation mining is a young and gradually maturing research area within computational linguistics. To develop practical applications of importance, we need reliable datasets. In this paper, we describe SciARK, a novel STI-driven multidisciplinary dataset with argumentation annotation on six of the 17 SDGs of the United Nations. Our annotation protocol resulted in a reliable dataset with a significant inter-annotation agreement. We evaluated the dataset on the claim/evidence extraction task using modern deep learning models getting promising results. We also demonstrate the need for multidisciplinary datasets since they could enable models to generalise better on unseen data Annotators Prediction Sentence",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Conclusions",
"sec_num": "7"
},
{
"text": "Climate-driven polar motion: 2003-2015 (Adhikari and Ivins, 2016) 1 Neither Evidence The changes in terrestrial water storage (TWS) and global cryosphere together explain nearly the entire amplitude ...",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "#1",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We also find that the TWS variability fully explains the decadal-like changes in polar motion observed during the ...",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Evidence Claim",
"sec_num": "2"
},
{
"text": "This newly discovered link between polar motion and global-scale TWS variability has broad implications for the study of ...",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Claim Neither",
"sec_num": "3"
},
{
"text": "The impact of large scale biomass production on ozone air pollution in Europe (Beltman et al., 2013) 4 Neither Evidence Although this scenario is rather conservative, our simulations project that isoprene emissions are substantially increased ... 5",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 78,
"end": 102,
"text": "(Beltman et al., 2013) 4",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "#2",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Evidence Evidence As a consequence, ozone peak values are expected to increase by up to 6%, and ozone indicators for damage to human health ... 6",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "#2",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Evidence Claim Finally, we show that after the change in land use NOx emission reductions of 15-20 % in Europe would be required to ... 7",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "#2",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Claim Claim Because biomass production is expected to increase throughout Europe in the coming decades, we conclude that...",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "#2",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Comparison of under-five mortality for 2000, 2005 and 2011 surveys in Ethiopia (Ayele and Zewotir, 2016) 8 Neither Evidence The effect of respondent's current age, age at first birth and educational level on the under-five mortality rate ... 9",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 79,
"end": 106,
"text": "(Ayele and Zewotir, 2016) 8",
"ref_id": null
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "#3",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Evidence Neither Regarding total children ever born, child death is more for the year 2000 followed by 2005 and 2011. 10 Neither Claim Conclusion: Based on the study, our findings confirmed that under-five mortality is a serious problem in the country. 11 Claim Claim The analysis displayed that the hazard of under-five mortality has a decreasing pattern in years. 12 Neither Claim Our study suggests that the impact of demographic characteristics and socio-economic factors on child mortality should ...",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "#3",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "Renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus in emerging countries (Ozcan and Ozturk, 2019) and outperform systems trained on domain-specific data. SciARK facilitates the development of \"Policy Intelligence\" by streamlining a big data, STIdriven policy modelling approach, improving human judgement for evidence-informed policy making. Our SciARK framework will be further exploited in adapting policies in the continuously evolving STI landscape, addressing sustainable development.",
"cite_spans": [
{
"start": 73,
"end": 97,
"text": "(Ozcan and Ozturk, 2019)",
"ref_id": "BIBREF35"
}
],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "#4",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "https://undocs.org/A/RES/70/1",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "We also use the term \"SDG domain\" or \"SDG\" for short.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "For the calculations we use the library irrCAC v1.0 for R (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/irrCAC/)",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "One can easily confirm the results using the beforementioned library, the coefficient values with their corresponding standard error values reported in this section.",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
},
{
"text": "https://nlp.stanford.edu/data/glove.6B.zip",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"back_matter": [
{
"text": "We thank all the annotators who have contributed to the annotations of our training data. This research work has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under grant agreement No 101004870 (the IntelComp Project).",
"cite_spans": [],
"ref_spans": [],
"eq_spans": [],
"section": "Acknowledgement",
"sec_num": null
}
],
"bib_entries": {
"BIBREF0": {
"ref_id": "b0",
"title": "Internet argument corpus 2.0: An SQL schema for dialogic social media and the corpora to go with it",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Rob",
"middle": [],
"last": "Abbott",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Brian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ecker",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pranav",
"middle": [],
"last": "Anand",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Marilyn",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Walker",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation LREC 2016",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Rob Abbott, Brian Ecker, Pranav Anand, and Mari- lyn A. Walker. 2016. Internet argument corpus 2.0: An SQL schema for dialogic social media and the corpora to go with it. In Proceedings of the Tenth In- ternational Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation LREC 2016, Portoro\u017e, Slovenia, May 23- 28, 2016. European Language Resources Associa- tion (ELRA).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF1": {
"ref_id": "b1",
"title": "Discourse-driven argument mining in scientific abstracts",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Pablo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Accuosto",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Horacio",
"middle": [],
"last": "Saggion",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Natural Language Processing and Information Systems -24th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, NLDB 2019",
"volume": "11608",
"issue": "",
"pages": "182--194",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1007/978-3-030-23281-8_15"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Pablo Accuosto and Horacio Saggion. 2019. Discourse-driven argument mining in scientific abstracts. In Natural Language Processing and In- formation Systems -24th International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems, NLDB 2019, Salford, UK, June 26-28, 2019, Proceedings, volume 11608 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 182-194. Springer.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF2": {
"ref_id": "b2",
"title": "Claim extraction in biomedical publications using deep discourse model and transfer learning",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Titipat",
"middle": [],
"last": "Achakulvisut",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Chandra",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bhagavatula",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Daniel",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Acu\u00f1a",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Konrad",
"middle": [
"P"
],
"last": "K\u00f6rding",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Titipat Achakulvisut, Chandra Bhagavatula, Daniel E. Acu\u00f1a, and Konrad P. K\u00f6rding. 2019. Claim extraction in biomedical publications using deep discourse model and transfer learning. CoRR, abs/1907.00962.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF3": {
"ref_id": "b3",
"title": "Climate-driven polar motion",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Adhikari",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ivins",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2003,
"venue": "Science Advances",
"volume": "2",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. Adhikari and E. Ivins. 2016. Climate-driven polar motion: 2003-2015. Science Advances, 2.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF4": {
"ref_id": "b4",
"title": "A corpus of potentially contradictory research claims from cardiovascular research abstracts",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Abdulaziz",
"middle": [],
"last": "Alamri",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mark",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stevenson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "J. Biomed. Semant",
"volume": "7",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1186/s13326-016-0083-z"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Abdulaziz Alamri and Mark Stevenson. 2016. A corpus of potentially contradictory research claims from cardiovascular research abstracts. J. Biomed. Semant., 7:36.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF5": {
"ref_id": "b5",
"title": "Practical statistics for medical research",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Altman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1990,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "D. Altman. 1990. Practical statistics for medical re- search. Chapman and Hall/CRC.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF6": {
"ref_id": "b6",
"title": "Comparison of underfive mortality for",
"authors": [
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ayele",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "T",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zewotir",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2000,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "D. Ayele and T. Zewotir. 2016. Comparison of under- five mortality for 2000, 2005 and 2011 surveys in ethiopia. BMC Public Health, 16.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF7": {
"ref_id": "b7",
"title": "Scibert: A pretrained language model for scientific text",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Iz",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beltagy",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kyle",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Arman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cohan",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "3613--3618",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/D19-1371"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Iz Beltagy, Kyle Lo, and Arman Cohan. 2019. Scib- ert: A pretrained language model for scientific text. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empiri- cal Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP-IJCNLP 2019, Hong Kong, China, November 3-7, 2019, pages 3613- 3618. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF8": {
"ref_id": "b8",
"title": "The impact of large scale biomass production on ozone air pollution in europe",
"authors": [
{
"first": "J",
"middle": [],
"last": "Beltman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hendriks",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tum",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schaap",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "Atmospheric Environment",
"volume": "71",
"issue": "",
"pages": "352--363",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J. Beltman, C. Hendriks, M. Tum, and M. Schaap. 2013. The impact of large scale biomass production on ozone air pollution in europe. Atmospheric Environ- ment, 71:352-363.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF9": {
"ref_id": "b9",
"title": "Beyond genes, proteins, and abstracts: Identifying scientific claims from fulltext biomedical articles",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Catherine",
"middle": [],
"last": "Blake",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2010,
"venue": "J. Biomed. Informatics",
"volume": "43",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "173--189",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1016/j.jbi.2009.11.001"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Catherine Blake. 2010. Beyond genes, proteins, and abstracts: Identifying scientific claims from full- text biomedical articles. J. Biomed. Informatics, 43(2):173-189.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF10": {
"ref_id": "b10",
"title": "Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, ArgMining@HLT-NAACL 2015",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Claire",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cardie",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Nancy",
"middle": [],
"last": "Green",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Iryna",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gurevych",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Graeme",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hirst",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Diane",
"middle": [],
"last": "Litman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Smaranda",
"middle": [],
"last": "Muresan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Georgios",
"middle": [],
"last": "Petasis",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Claire Cardie, Nancy Green, Iryna Gurevych, Graeme Hirst, Diane Litman, Smaranda Muresan, Georgios Petasis, Manfred Stede, Marilyn Walker, and Janyce Wiebe, editors. 2015. Proceedings of the 2nd Work- shop on Argumentation Mining, ArgMining@HLT- NAACL 2015, June 4, 2015, Denver, Colorado, USA. The Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF11": {
"ref_id": "b11",
"title": "Give me more feedback: Annotating argument persuasiveness and related attributes in student essays",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Winston",
"middle": [],
"last": "Carlile",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Nishant",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gurrapadi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Zixuan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ke",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Vincent",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ng",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2018",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "621--631",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/P18-1058"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Winston Carlile, Nishant Gurrapadi, Zixuan Ke, and Vincent Ng. 2018. Give me more feedback: Anno- tating argument persuasiveness and related attributes in student essays. In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics, ACL 2018, Melbourne, Australia, July 15- 20, 2018, Volume 1: Long Papers, pages 621-631. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF12": {
"ref_id": "b12",
"title": "Developing criteria for establishing interrater reliability of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior",
"authors": [
{
"first": "V",
"middle": [],
"last": "Domenic",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sara",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Cicchetti",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sparrow",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1981,
"venue": "American journal of mental deficiency",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Domenic V Cicchetti and Sara A Sparrow. 1981. De- veloping criteria for establishing interrater reliabil- ity of specific items: applications to assessment of adaptive behavior. American journal of mental defi- ciency.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF13": {
"ref_id": "b13",
"title": "BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jacob",
"middle": [],
"last": "Devlin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ming-Wei",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kenton",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lee",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kristina",
"middle": [],
"last": "Toutanova",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2018. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language under- standing. CoRR, abs/1810.04805.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF14": {
"ref_id": "b14",
"title": "A controlled vocabulary defining the semantic perimeter of sustainable development goals",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Nicolau",
"middle": [],
"last": "Duran-Silva",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Enric",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fuster",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Francesco",
"middle": [
"Alessandro"
],
"last": "Massucci",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Arnau",
"middle": [],
"last": "Quinquill\u00e0",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.5281/ZENODO.4118028"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Nicolau Duran-Silva, Enric Fuster, Francesco Alessan- dro Massucci, and Arnau Quinquill\u00e0. 2019. A con- trolled vocabulary defining the semantic perimeter of sustainable development goals.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF15": {
"ref_id": "b15",
"title": "Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Joseph",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Fleiss",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1971,
"venue": "Psychological bulletin",
"volume": "76",
"issue": "5",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Joseph L Fleiss. 1971. Measuring nominal scale agree- ment among many raters. Psychological bulletin, 76(5):378.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF16": {
"ref_id": "b16",
"title": "Argument extraction from news, blogs, and the social web",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Theodosios",
"middle": [],
"last": "Goudas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christos",
"middle": [],
"last": "Louizos",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools",
"volume": "24",
"issue": "5",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1142/S0218213015400242"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Theodosios Goudas, Christos Louizos, Georgios Peta- sis, and Vangelis Karkaletsis. 2015. Argument ex- traction from news, blogs, and the social web. Int. J. Artif. Intell. Tools, 24(5):1540024:1-1540024:22.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF17": {
"ref_id": "b17",
"title": "Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining. Association for Computational Linguistics",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Nancy",
"middle": [],
"last": "Green",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kevin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ashley",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Diane",
"middle": [],
"last": "Litman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Nancy Green, Kevin Ashley, Diane Litman, Chris Reed, and Vern Walker, editors. 2014. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argumentation Mining. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics, Baltimore, Maryland.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF18": {
"ref_id": "b18",
"title": "Handbook of inter-rater reliability: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters",
"authors": [
{
"first": "L",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kilem",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gwet",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "Advanced Analytics, LLC",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Kilem L Gwet. 2014. Handbook of inter-rater relia- bility: The definitive guide to measuring the extent of agreement among raters. Advanced Analytics, LLC.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF19": {
"ref_id": "b19",
"title": "Argumentation mining in user-generated web discourse",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ivan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Habernal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Iryna",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gurevych",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "",
"volume": "43",
"issue": "",
"pages": "125--179",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1162/COLI_a_00276"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ivan Habernal and Iryna Gurevych. 2017. Argumenta- tion mining in user-generated web discourse. Com- put. Linguistics, 43(1):125-179.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF20": {
"ref_id": "b20",
"title": "Georgios Petasis",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ivan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Habernal",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Iryna",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gurevych",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kevin",
"middle": [
"D"
],
"last": "Ashley",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Claire",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cardie",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Nancy",
"middle": [],
"last": "Green",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Diane",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Litman",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMining@EMNLP 2017",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Ivan Habernal, Iryna Gurevych, Kevin D. Ashley, Claire Cardie, Nancy Green, Diane J. Litman, Geor- gios Petasis, Chris Reed, Noam Slonim, and Vern R. Walker, editors. 2017. Proceedings of the 4th Work- shop on Argument Mining, ArgMining@EMNLP 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 8, 2017. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF21": {
"ref_id": "b21",
"title": "Consort for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: Explanation and elaboration",
"authors": [
{
"first": "S",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hopewell",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [],
"last": "Clarke",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Moher",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "E",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wager",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "P",
"middle": [],
"last": "Middleton",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "D",
"middle": [],
"last": "Altman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "K",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schulz",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "PLoS Medicine",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "S. Hopewell, M. Clarke, D. Moher, E. Wager, P. Mid- dleton, D. Altman, and K. Schulz. 2008. Consort for reporting randomized controlled trials in journal and conference abstracts: Explanation and elabora- tion. PLoS Medicine, 5.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF22": {
"ref_id": "b22",
"title": "Learning whom to trust with MACE",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Dirk",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hovy",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Taylor",
"middle": [],
"last": "Berg-Kirkpatrick",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ashish",
"middle": [],
"last": "Vaswani",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Eduard",
"middle": [
"H"
],
"last": "Hovy",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "Human Language Technologies: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Proceedings",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1120--1130",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Dirk Hovy, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Ashish Vaswani, and Eduard H. Hovy. 2013. Learning whom to trust with MACE. In Human Language Technologies: Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association of Computational Linguistics, Proceed- ings, June 9-14, 2013, Westin Peachtree Plaza Hotel, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, pages 1120-1130. The Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF23": {
"ref_id": "b23",
"title": "A shared task on argumentation mining in newspaper editorials",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Johannes",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kiesel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Al",
"middle": [],
"last": "Khalid",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Matthias",
"middle": [],
"last": "Khatib",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Benno",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hagen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stein",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, ArgMining@HLT-NAACL 2015",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "35--38",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.3115/v1/w15-0505"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Johannes Kiesel, Khalid Al Khatib, Matthias Hagen, and Benno Stein. 2015. A shared task on argumen- tation mining in newspaper editorials. In Proceed- ings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, ArgMining@HLT-NAACL 2015, June 4, 2015, Den- ver, Colorado, USA, pages 35-38. The Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF24": {
"ref_id": "b24",
"title": "Linking the thoughts: Analysis of argumentation structures in scientific publications",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kirschner",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Judith",
"middle": [],
"last": "Eckle-Kohler",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Iryna",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gurevych",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumentation Mining, ArgMining@HLT-NAACL 2015",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1--11",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.3115/v1/w15-0501"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Christian Kirschner, Judith Eckle-Kohler, and Iryna Gurevych. 2015. Linking the thoughts: Analysis of argumentation structures in scientific publications. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Argumenta- tion Mining, ArgMining@HLT-NAACL 2015, June 4, 2015, Denver, Colorado, USA, pages 1-11. The Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF25": {
"ref_id": "b25",
"title": "The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Richard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Landis",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Gary G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Koch",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1977,
"venue": "biometrics",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "159--174",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "J Richard Landis and Gary G Koch. 1977. The mea- surement of observer agreement for categorical data. biometrics, pages 159-174.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF26": {
"ref_id": "b26",
"title": "An argument-annotated corpus of scientific publications",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Anne",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lauscher",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Goran",
"middle": [],
"last": "Glavas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Simone",
"middle": [
"Paolo"
],
"last": "Ponzetto",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMining@EMNLP 2018",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "40--46",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/w18-5206"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Anne Lauscher, Goran Glavas, and Simone Paolo Ponzetto. 2018. An argument-annotated corpus of scientific publications. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMin- ing@EMNLP 2018, Brussels, Belgium, November 1, 2018, pages 40-46. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF27": {
"ref_id": "b27",
"title": "Argument mining: A survey",
"authors": [
{
"first": "John",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lawrence",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Chris",
"middle": [],
"last": "Reed",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Computational Linguistics",
"volume": "45",
"issue": "4",
"pages": "765--818",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1162/coli_a_00364"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "John Lawrence and Chris Reed. 2019. Argument mining: A survey. Computational Linguistics, 45(4):765-818.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF28": {
"ref_id": "b28",
"title": "Argumentation mining: State of the art and emerging trends",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Marco",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lippi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Paolo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Torroni",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "ACM Trans. Internet Technol",
"volume": "16",
"issue": "2",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/2850417"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Marco Lippi and Paolo Torroni. 2016. Argumentation mining: State of the art and emerging trends. ACM Trans. Internet Technol., 16(2).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF29": {
"ref_id": "b29",
"title": "Using argument-based features to predict and analyse review helpfulness",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Haijing",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Yang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gao",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lv",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Mengxue",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Shiqiang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Geng",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Minglan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hao",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wang",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2017 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1358--1363",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/d17-1142"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Haijing Liu, Yang Gao, Pin Lv, Mengxue Li, Shiqiang Geng, Minglan Li, and Hao Wang. 2017. Using argument-based features to predict and analyse re- view helpfulness. In Proceedings of the 2017 Con- ference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, EMNLP 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 9-11, 2017, pages 1358-1363. Associa- tion for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF30": {
"ref_id": "b30",
"title": "The evolution of argumentation mining: From models to social media and emerging tools",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Anastasios",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lytos",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Thomas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lagkas",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "G",
"middle": [],
"last": "Panagiotis",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kalina",
"middle": [],
"last": "Sarigiannidis",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Bontcheva",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Anastasios Lytos, Thomas Lagkas, Panagiotis G. Sa- rigiannidis, and Kalina Bontcheva. 2019. The evolution of argumentation mining: From mod- els to social media and emerging tools. CoRR, abs/1907.02258.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF31": {
"ref_id": "b31",
"title": "Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization",
"authors": [
{
"first": "C",
"middle": [],
"last": "William",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sandra",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Mann",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Thompson",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1988,
"venue": "Text -Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse",
"volume": "8",
"issue": "3",
"pages": "243--281",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1515/text.1.1988.8.3.243"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "William C. Mann and Sandra A. Thompson. 1988. Rhetorical structure theory: Toward a functional the- ory of text organization. Text -Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 8(3):243-281.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF32": {
"ref_id": "b32",
"title": "Evidence type classification in randomized controlled trials",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Tobias",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mayer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Elena",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cabrio",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Serena",
"middle": [],
"last": "Villata",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Argument Mining",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "29--34",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/w18-5204"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Tobias Mayer, Elena Cabrio, and Serena Villata. 2018. Evidence type classification in randomized con- trolled trials. In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMining@EMNLP 2018, Brus- sels, Belgium, November 1, 2018, pages 29-34. As- sociation for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF33": {
"ref_id": "b33",
"title": "Transformer-based argument mining for healthcare applications",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Tobias",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mayer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Elena",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cabrio",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Serena",
"middle": [],
"last": "Villata",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "-Including 10th Conference on Prestigious Applications of Artificial Intelligence",
"volume": "2020",
"issue": "",
"pages": "2108--2115",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.3233/FAIA200334"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Tobias Mayer, Elena Cabrio, and Serena Villata. 2020. Transformer-based argument mining for healthcare applications. In ECAI 2020 -24th European Confer- ence on Artificial Intelligence, 29 August-8 Septem- ber 2020, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, August 29 -September 8, 2020 -Including 10th Conference on Prestigious Applications of Artificial Intelligence (PAIS 2020), volume 325 of Frontiers in Artificial In- telligence and Applications, pages 2108-2115. IOS Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF34": {
"ref_id": "b34",
"title": "Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real arguments?: a case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHR",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Raquel",
"middle": [],
"last": "Mochales",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Aagje",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ieven",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2009,
"venue": "The 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "21--30",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1145/1568234.1568238"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Raquel Mochales and Aagje Ieven. 2009. Creating an argumentation corpus: do theories apply to real ar- guments?: a case study on the legal argumentation of the ECHR. In The 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Proceedings of the Conference, June 8-12, 2009, Barcelona, Spain, pages 21-30. ACM.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF35": {
"ref_id": "b35",
"title": "Renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus in emerging countries: A bootstrap panel causality test",
"authors": [
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ozcan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "I",
"middle": [],
"last": "Ozturk",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews",
"volume": "104",
"issue": "",
"pages": "30--37",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "B. Ozcan and I. Ozturk. 2019. Renewable energy consumption-economic growth nexus in emerging countries: A bootstrap panel causality test. Renew- able & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104:30-37.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF36": {
"ref_id": "b36",
"title": "From argument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: A survey",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Andreas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Peldszus",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Manfred",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stede",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell",
"volume": "7",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "1--31",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.4018/jcini.2013010101"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Andreas Peldszus and Manfred Stede. 2013. From ar- gument diagrams to argumentation mining in texts: A survey. Int. J. Cogn. Informatics Nat. Intell., 7(1):1-31.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF37": {
"ref_id": "b37",
"title": "GloVe: Global vectors for word representation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jeffrey",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pennington",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Richard",
"middle": [],
"last": "Socher",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Christopher",
"middle": [],
"last": "Manning",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP)",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1532--1543",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.3115/v1/D14-1162"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014. GloVe: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Confer- ence on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1532-1543, Doha, Qatar. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF38": {
"ref_id": "b38",
"title": "Beltracker: evidence sentence retrieval for BEL statements",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Ravikumar",
"middle": [],
"last": "Majid Rastegar-Mojarad",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hongfang",
"middle": [],
"last": "Komandur Elayavilli",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Liu",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "Database J. Biol. Databases Curation",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1093/database/baw079"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Majid Rastegar-Mojarad, Ravikumar Komandur Elayavilli, and Hongfang Liu. 2016. Beltracker: evidence sentence retrieval for BEL statements. Database J. Biol. Databases Curation, 2016.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF39": {
"ref_id": "b39",
"title": "The Association for Computer Linguistics",
"authors": [],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining, hosted by the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ArgMining@ACL 2016",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/W16-28"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Chris Reed, editor. 2016. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining, hosted by the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics, ArgMining@ACL 2016, August 12, Berlin, Germany. The Association for Computer Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF40": {
"ref_id": "b40",
"title": "Dsm-5 field trials in the united states and canada, part ii: test-retest reliability of selected categorical diagnoses",
"authors": [
{
"first": "A",
"middle": [],
"last": "Darrel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "William",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Regier",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Diana",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Narrow",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Helena",
"middle": [
"C"
],
"last": "Clarke",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Janet",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kraemer",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Emily",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Kuramoto",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "David",
"middle": [
"J"
],
"last": "Kuhl",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Kupfer",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2013,
"venue": "American journal of psychiatry",
"volume": "170",
"issue": "1",
"pages": "59--70",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Darrel A Regier, William E Narrow, Diana E Clarke, Helena C Kraemer, S Janet Kuramoto, Emily A Kuhl, and David J Kupfer. 2013. Dsm-5 field trials in the united states and canada, part ii: test-retest re- liability of selected categorical diagnoses. American journal of psychiatry, 170(1):59-70.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF41": {
"ref_id": "b41",
"title": "Extracting case law sentences for argumentation about the meaning of statutory terms",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jarom\u00edr",
"middle": [],
"last": "Savelka",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kevin",
"middle": [
"D"
],
"last": "Ashley",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2016,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining, hosted by the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ArgMining@ACL 2016",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/w16-2806"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jarom\u00edr Savelka and Kevin D. Ashley. 2016. Extract- ing case law sentences for argumentation about the meaning of statutory terms. In Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining, hosted by the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, ArgMining@ACL 2016, August 12, Berlin, Germany. The Association for Computer Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF42": {
"ref_id": "b42",
"title": "Automated argumentation mining to the rescue? envisioning argumentation and decision-making support for debates in open online collaboration communities",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Jodi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schneider",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argument Mining, hosted by the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ArgMining@ACL 2014",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "59--63",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.3115/v1/w14-2108"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Jodi Schneider. 2014. Automated argumentation min- ing to the rescue? envisioning argumentation and decision-making support for debates in open online collaboration communities. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Argument Mining, hosted by the 52nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Com- putational Linguistics, ArgMining@ACL 2014, June 26, 2014, Baltimore, Maryland, USA, pages 59-63. The Association for Computer Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF43": {
"ref_id": "b43",
"title": "Multi-dimensional classification of biomedical text: Toward automated, practical provision of high-utility text to diverse users",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Hagit",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shatkay",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Fengxia",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrey",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rzhetsky",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "W. John",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wilbur",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2008,
"venue": "Bioinform",
"volume": "24",
"issue": "18",
"pages": "2086--2093",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1093/bioinformatics/btn381"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hagit Shatkay, Fengxia Pan, Andrey Rzhetsky, and W. John Wilbur. 2008. Multi-dimensional classifica- tion of biomedical text: Toward automated, practical provision of high-utility text to diverse users. Bioin- form., 24(18):2086-2093.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF44": {
"ref_id": "b44",
"title": "Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Argument Mining",
"authors": [],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "ArgMining@",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Noam Slonim and Ranit Aharonov, editors. 2018. Pro- ceedings of the 5th Workshop on Argument Min- ing, ArgMining@EMNLP 2018, Brussels, Belgium, November 1, 2018. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF45": {
"ref_id": "b45",
"title": "The introduction, methods, results, and discussion (imrad) structure: a fifty-year survey",
"authors": [
{
"first": "B",
"middle": [],
"last": "Luciana",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "M",
"middle": [
"G"
],
"last": "Sollaci",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Pereira",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2004,
"venue": "Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA",
"volume": "92",
"issue": "",
"pages": "364--367",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Luciana B Sollaci and M. G. Pereira. 2004. The in- troduction, methods, results, and discussion (imrad) structure: a fifty-year survey. Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA, 92 3:364-367.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF46": {
"ref_id": "b46",
"title": "Annotating argument components and relations in persuasive essays",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stab",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Iryna",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gurevych",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2014,
"venue": "COLING 2014, 25th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference: Technical Papers",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "1501--1510",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Christian Stab and Iryna Gurevych. 2014. Annotating argument components and relations in persuasive es- says. In COLING 2014, 25th International Con- ference on Computational Linguistics, Proceedings of the Conference: Technical Papers, August 23-29, 2014, Dublin, Ireland, pages 1501-1510. ACL.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF47": {
"ref_id": "b47",
"title": "Crosstopic argument mining from heterogeneous sources",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Christian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stab",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Tristan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Miller",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Benjamin",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schiller",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pranav",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rai",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Iryna",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gurevych",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "3664--3674",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/D18-1402"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Christian Stab, Tristan Miller, Benjamin Schiller, Pranav Rai, and Iryna Gurevych. 2018. Cross- topic argument mining from heterogeneous sources. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Em- pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 3664-3674, Brussels, Belgium. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF48": {
"ref_id": "b48",
"title": "Argumentation mining",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Manfred",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stede",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jodi",
"middle": [],
"last": "Schneider",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.2200/S00883ED1V01Y201811HLT040"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Manfred Stede and Jodi Schneider. 2019. Argumenta- tion mining. Morgan & Claypool Publishers.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF49": {
"ref_id": "b49",
"title": "Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMining@ACL 2019",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Benno",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stein",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Henning",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wachsmuth",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Benno Stein and Henning Wachsmuth, editors. 2019. Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Argument Min- ing, ArgMining@ACL 2019, Florence, Italy, August 1, 2019. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF50": {
"ref_id": "b50",
"title": "FEVER: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and verification",
"authors": [
{
"first": "James",
"middle": [],
"last": "Thorne",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andreas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Vlachos",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/n18-1074"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "James Thorne, Andreas Vlachos, Christos Christodoulopoulos, and Arpit Mittal. 2018. FEVER: a large-scale dataset for fact extraction and verification. In Proceedings of the 2018",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF51": {
"ref_id": "b51",
"title": "Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies",
"authors": [],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "",
"volume": "1",
"issue": "",
"pages": "809--819",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, NAACL-HLT 2018, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, June 1-6, 2018, Volume 1 (Long Papers), pages 809-819. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF52": {
"ref_id": "b52",
"title": "Automatic argument quality assessment -new datasets and methods",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Assaf",
"middle": [],
"last": "Toledo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Shai",
"middle": [],
"last": "Gretz",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Edo",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cohen-Karlik",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Roni",
"middle": [],
"last": "Friedman",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Elad",
"middle": [],
"last": "Venezian",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Dan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lahav",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Michal",
"middle": [],
"last": "Jacovi",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Ranit",
"middle": [],
"last": "Aharonov",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Noam",
"middle": [],
"last": "Slonim",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2019,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "5624--5634",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/D19-1564"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Assaf Toledo, Shai Gretz, Edo Cohen-Karlik, Roni Friedman, Elad Venezian, Dan Lahav, Michal Ja- covi, Ranit Aharonov, and Noam Slonim. 2019. Au- tomatic argument quality assessment -new datasets and methods. In Proceedings of the 2019 Confer- ence on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Confer- ence on Natural Language Processing, EMNLP- IJCNLP 2019, Hong Kong, China, November 3-7, 2019, pages 5624-5634. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF53": {
"ref_id": "b53",
"title": "The uses of argument",
"authors": [
{
"first": "",
"middle": [],
"last": "Stephen E Toulmin",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 1958,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1080/00048405985200191"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Stephen E Toulmin. 1958. The uses of argument. Cam- bridge university press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF54": {
"ref_id": "b54",
"title": "Fact or fiction: Verifying scientific claims",
"authors": [
{
"first": "David",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wadden",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Shanchuan",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lin",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Kyle",
"middle": [],
"last": "Lo",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Lucy",
"middle": [
"Lu"
],
"last": "Wang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Madeleine",
"middle": [],
"last": "Van Zuylen",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Arman",
"middle": [],
"last": "Cohan",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hannaneh",
"middle": [],
"last": "Hajishirzi",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2020,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing",
"volume": "2020",
"issue": "",
"pages": "7534--7550",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.609"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "David Wadden, Shanchuan Lin, Kyle Lo, Lucy Lu Wang, Madeleine van Zuylen, Arman Cohan, and Hannaneh Hajishirzi. 2020. Fact or fiction: Verify- ing scientific claims. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Lan- guage Processing, EMNLP 2020, Online, Novem- ber 16-20, 2020, pages 7534-7550. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF55": {
"ref_id": "b55",
"title": "A corpus for research on deliberation and debate",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Marilyn",
"middle": [
"A"
],
"last": "Walker",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Jean",
"middle": [
"E"
],
"last": "Fox Tree",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Pranav",
"middle": [],
"last": "Anand",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Rob",
"middle": [],
"last": "Abbott",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Joseph",
"middle": [],
"last": "King",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "812--817",
"other_ids": {},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Marilyn A. Walker, Jean E. Fox Tree, Pranav Anand, Rob Abbott, and Joseph King. 2012. A corpus for research on deliberation and debate. In Proceed- ings of the Eighth International Conference on Lan- guage Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2012, Istan- bul, Turkey, May 23-25, 2012, pages 812-817. Euro- pean Language Resources Association (ELRA).",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF56": {
"ref_id": "b56",
"title": "Goal-based Reasoning for Argumentation",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Douglas",
"middle": [],
"last": "Walton",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2015,
"venue": "",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1017/cbo9781316340554"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Douglas Walton. 2015. Goal-based Reasoning for Ar- gumentation. Cambridge University Press.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF57": {
"ref_id": "b57",
"title": "New directions in biomedical text annotation: definitions, guidelines and corpus construction",
"authors": [
{
"first": "W. John",
"middle": [],
"last": "Wilbur",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Andrey",
"middle": [],
"last": "Rzhetsky",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Hagit",
"middle": [],
"last": "Shatkay",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2006,
"venue": "BMC Bioinform",
"volume": "7",
"issue": "",
"pages": "",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1186/1471-2105-7-356"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "W. John Wilbur, Andrey Rzhetsky, and Hagit Shatkay. 2006. New directions in biomedical text annota- tion: definitions, guidelines and corpus construction. BMC Bioinform., 7:356.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF58": {
"ref_id": "b58",
"title": "Annotation of argument structure in japanese legal documents",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Hiroaki",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yamada",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Simone",
"middle": [],
"last": "Teufel",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Takenobu",
"middle": [],
"last": "Tokunaga",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2017,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMining@EMNLP 2017",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "22--31",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/w17-5103"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Hiroaki Yamada, Simone Teufel, and Takenobu Tokunaga. 2017. Annotation of argument struc- ture in japanese legal documents. In Proceed- ings of the 4th Workshop on Argument Mining, ArgMining@EMNLP 2017, Copenhagen, Denmark, September 8, 2017, pages 22-31. Association for Computational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF59": {
"ref_id": "b59",
"title": "Scidtb: Discourse dependency treebank for scientific abstracts",
"authors": [
{
"first": "An",
"middle": [],
"last": "Yang",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Sujian",
"middle": [],
"last": "Li",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2018,
"venue": "Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2018",
"volume": "2",
"issue": "",
"pages": "444--449",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.18653/v1/P18-2071"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "An Yang and Sujian Li. 2018. Scidtb: Discourse de- pendency treebank for scientific abstracts. In Pro- ceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics, ACL 2018, Melbourne, Australia, July 15-20, 2018, Volume 2: Short Papers, pages 444-449. Association for Com- putational Linguistics.",
"links": null
},
"BIBREF60": {
"ref_id": "b60",
"title": "Lower bounds to future sea-level rise",
"authors": [
{
"first": "Antonio",
"middle": [],
"last": "Zecca",
"suffix": ""
},
{
"first": "Luca",
"middle": [],
"last": "Chiari",
"suffix": ""
}
],
"year": 2012,
"venue": "Global and Planetary Change",
"volume": "",
"issue": "",
"pages": "98--99",
"other_ids": {
"DOI": [
"10.1016/j.gloplacha.2012.08.002"
]
},
"num": null,
"urls": [],
"raw_text": "Antonio Zecca and Luca Chiari. 2012. Lower bounds to future sea-level rise. Global and Planetary Change, 98-99:1-5.",
"links": null
}
},
"ref_entries": {
"FIGREF0": {
"num": null,
"text": "1 0 . 2 0 . 3 0 . 4 0 . 5 0 . 6 0 . 7 0 . 8 0 . Histogram with the relative positions of Claim and Evidence categories within an abstract.",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null
},
"FIGREF1": {
"num": null,
"text": "A source of disagreement is found in sentences in",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null
},
"FIGREF2": {
"num": null,
"text": "Diagram of our neural network architecture for the Sentence Sequence Tagging task. The Sentence Encoder layer outputs m sentence vectors for the m sentences of an abstract with n words each, and the Context Encoder updates the sentence vectors utilising their context. A Fully Connected layer gives a label for each sentence.",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null
},
"FIGREF3": {
"num": null,
"text": "F1-scores for the Claim and Evidence using as a test set the SDG policy domains 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, and 13 successively. The results are from the SciBERT-BiLSTM model once trained on the remaining domains of SciARK dataset and once trained on AbstRCT dataset.",
"type_str": "figure",
"uris": null
},
"TABREF0": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"text": "Number of annotators and annotated abstracts grouped by SDG policy domain.",
"content": "<table/>"
},
"TABREF1": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"text": "shows the trend on each domain. The main reason that this pattern is almost a rule on SDG3 and SDG5 is that many abstracts are from the biomedical domain. Most of those abstracts follow the IMRAD (Sollaci and Claim (%) 99.67 95.29 88.52 90.0086.54 88.17 Claim / Evidence (%) 00.34 04.71 11.48 10.00 13.46 11.83",
"content": "<table><tr><td>SDG 3</td><td>5</td><td>7</td><td>10</td><td>12</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>Structure</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr><tr><td>Evidence /</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr></table>"
},
"TABREF2": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"text": "The argument structure on the corpus, i.e., Evidence followed by Claim or Claim followed by Evidence.",
"content": "<table><tr><td>SDG</td><td>3</td><td>5</td><td>7</td><td>10</td><td>12</td><td>13</td></tr><tr><td>\u03ba a 1</td><td colspan=\"6\">.671 .595 .596 .665 .628 .557</td></tr><tr><td>\u03ba a 2</td><td colspan=\"6\">.621 .610 .641 .657 .653 .518</td></tr><tr><td>\u03ba a 3</td><td colspan=\"6\">.721 .740 .567 .577 .503 .525</td></tr><tr><td>\u03ba a 4</td><td colspan=\"2\">.599 .725</td><td/><td/><td/><td>.542</td></tr><tr><td>\u03ba a 5</td><td colspan=\"2\">.622 .748</td><td/><td/><td/><td>.582</td></tr><tr><td>\u03ba a 6</td><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/><td/></tr></table>"
},
"TABREF5": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"text": "Confusion matrix of the predictions by the SciBERT -BiLSTM model.",
"content": "<table/>"
},
"TABREF7": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"text": "13 Evidence Evidence The results indicated that the neutrality hypothesis does hold for all of the markets studied except for Poland, ... 14 Claim Evidence As such, because of the nonexistence of causality running from renewable energy demand to economic growth, energy saving ... 15 Neither Claim For Poland; however, energy conservation policies may have detrimental effects on the country's economic performance level.",
"content": "<table/>"
},
"TABREF8": {
"num": null,
"type_str": "table",
"html": null,
"text": "Excerpts from abstracts with the categories by the annotators and the model prediction. All other sentences have the Neither category.",
"content": "<table/>"
}
}
}
} |