PATENT ABSTRACT
A computer program product comprising computer executable instructions stored on a non-transitory computer readable medium such that when executed by a processor cause a service specific virtual topology base, positioned in a network stratum, to receive a virtual service negotiation initiation message from an application stratum component, wherein the initiation message comprises a plurality of network source addresses, a plurality of network destination addresses, and a service specific objective, obtain a plurality of computed network paths that traverse a network of network stratum Network Elements (NEs) between the network source addresses and the network destination addresses and meet the service specific objective, and calculate service specific virtual topology that abstractly represents the computed service specific network paths.

PATENT DESCRIPTION
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION 
       [0001]    The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application 61/710,501, filed Oct. 5, 2012 by Young Lee, et. al., and entitled “Software Defined Network Virtualization System with Service Specific Topology Abstraction and Interface,” which is incorporated herein by reference as if reproduced in its entirety. 
     
    
     STATEMENT REGARDING FEDERALLY SPONSORED RESEARCH OR DEVELOPMENT 
       [0002]    Not applicable. 
       REFERENCE TO A MICROFICHE APPENDIX 
       [0003]    Not applicable. 
       BACKGROUND 
       [0004]    Network carriers, also sometimes referred to as telecommunications operators or communications service providers, that operate existing networks may desire to optimize network utilization for passing traffic, such as Internet Protocol (IP) traffic, over the lower layers of the network, e.g. across Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) model layers 1 to 5 of the network. The optimized traffic may include traffic for triple play services (e.g. Video, Voice, and/or Data) and any type of bulk data transfer. In existing networks, end-to-end services are typically set-up by Operational Support Systems (OSS) or provider specific network management service applications. Network carriers have suggested scenarios for optimizing network utilization and traffic, such as optimizing existing network services and enabling new/emerging network application services. 
       SUMMARY 
       [0005]    In one embodiment, the disclosure includes a service specific virtual topology base positioned in a network stratum. The service specific virtual topology base may receive a virtual service negotiation initiation from an application stratum component. The request may comprise a plurality of network source addresses, a plurality of network destination addresses, and a service specific objective. The service specific virtual topology base may obtain a plurality of computed network paths that traverse a network of network stratum Network Elements (NEs) between the network source addresses and the network destination addresses and meet the service specific objective. The service specific virtual topology base may then calculate a service specific virtual topology that abstractly represents the computed service specific network paths. 
         [0006]    In another embodiment, the disclosure includes an apparatus comprising a receiver configured to receive a virtual network service initiation message from an application stratum component. The request may comprise one or more source addresses, one or more destination addresses, and a service specific objective. The apparatus may further comprise a processor coupled to the receiver and configured to calculate a service specific virtual topology that abstractly represents a network of network stratum NEs connecting the source addresses and the destination addresses based on the service specific objective. The apparatus may also comprise a transmitter coupled to the processor and configured to transmit the service specific virtual topology to the application stratum component. 
         [0007]    In another embodiment, the disclosure includes a method implemented in a Provider Network Controller (PNC). The PNC may negotiate with a Data Center (DC) controller to identify a set of endpoints that a DC wishes to connect. The PNC may receive traffic characteristics from the DC controller that should be supported between the endpoints by a Virtual Network Topology (VNT). The PNC may also initiate a request to a path computation entity and receive a topology generated by a k-shortest path algorithm based on a service objective function related to the traffic characteristics. The PNC may then provide the VNT based on an abstraction of the topology in response to the DC controller. 
         [0008]    These and other features will be more clearly understood from the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and claims. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
         [0009]    For a more complete understanding of this disclosure, reference is now made to the following brief description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings and detailed description, wherein like reference numerals represent like parts. 
           [0010]      FIG. 1  is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a DC interconnection network architecture. 
           [0011]      FIG. 2  is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of a DC interconnection network architecture. 
           [0012]      FIG. 3  is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a NE, which may act as a node within a DC interconnection network architecture. 
           [0013]      FIG. 4  is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method of generating a service specific virtual topology. 
           [0014]      FIG. 5  is a schematic diagram of an example network stratum network topology. 
           [0015]      FIG. 6A  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific topology for a lowest latency service specific objective. 
           [0016]      FIG. 6B  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific virtual topology for a lowest latency service specific objective. 
           [0017]      FIG. 7A  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific topology for a lowest monetary cost service specific objective. 
           [0018]      FIG. 7B  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific virtual topology for a lowest monetary cost service specific objective. 
           [0019]      FIG. 8A  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific topology for a highest reliability service specific objective. 
           [0020]      FIG. 8B  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific virtual topology for a highest reliability service specific objective. 
           [0021]      FIG. 9A  is a schematic diagram of another example service specific topology for a highest reliability service specific objective. 
           [0022]      FIG. 9B  is a schematic diagram of another example service specific virtual topology for a highest reliability service specific objective. 
           [0023]      FIG. 10A  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific topology for a highest reliability service specific objective when employing three disjoint paths. 
           [0024]      FIG. 10B  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific virtual topology for a highest reliability service specific objective when employing three disjoint paths. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION 
       [0025]    It should be understood at the outset that although an illustrative implementation of one or more embodiments are provided below, the disclosed systems and/or methods may be implemented using any number of techniques, whether currently known or in existence. The disclosure should in no way be limited to the illustrative implementations, drawings, and techniques illustrated below, including the exemplary designs and implementations illustrated and described herein, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims along with their full scope of equivalents. 
         [0026]    The provisioning and operation of new/emerging applications, such as cloud computing, may involve provisioning of processing resources and/or storage space on multiple network components (e.g. servers). Based on the changing needs of a user, resources/data may be migrated between servers, which may be positioned in one or more DCs. Such transfers may be intra-DC transfers, inter-DC transfers, and/or inter-telecommunications provider transfers. The associated networks may be divided into an application stratum and a network stratum. The application stratum may include the applications and/or services implemented and/or operating in the application layer, the presentation layer, and/or the session layer of the OSI model. The network stratum may include processes operating in the transport layer, network layer, data link layer, and/or physical layer of the OSI model. Services operating in the application stratum may be aware of available server resources, but may not be aware of, and may not be configured to interpret data relating to, network topology and/or network resources. For example, an application stratum process may be configured to send a ping message to determine latency between two network nodes at a specific point in time, but may not be able to determine the reason for such latency, how such latency changes over time, and/or what the latency would be when performing a multi-node to multi-node transfer. Likewise, network stratum processes may not have access and/or the ability to interpret application stratum resource data. Further, systems operating in different strata may be owned by different telecommunications providers. As such, complete inter strata sharing may result in unacceptable security concerns in some cases. For these reasons, services operating in either stratum may be unable to select optimal destination server(s) for data/resource migration due to lack of complete information, resulting in a server selection (SS) problem. Because of strict separation between the strata and separation between providers, handling and coordinating service provisioning across both the application stratum and the network stratum may be different from handling traditional services, such as network provisioning of an end-to-end data transfer between a single source and a single destination. 
         [0027]    Additionally, DC interconnection may be based on a pre-allocated static Wide Area Network (WAN) optical pipes between DC sites. The pre-allocated capacity between DC sites may be engineered for peak rate and may be underutilized due to fluctuating traffic demands. This mode of operation may not be suited to dynamic allocation of new applications to one out of a number of candidate DC sites, while adjusting the WAN bandwidth accordingly. For example, some workload or data may need to be migrated on the fly from one DC to another. Disaster recovery is another example in which a large amount of data may need to find alternative DCs when the currently serving DC experiences an outage affecting application performance. As such, DC interconnection as discussed above may lack a seamless orchestration between DC control and Provider Network control. 
         [0028]    Disclosed herein is a service specific virtual topology base that may be positioned in a network stratum and may generate an abstracted representation of a service specific limited set of network topology data. An application stratum component, for example a DC controller, may initiate a virtual service negotiation with the service specific virtual topology base by transmitting virtual service request that comprises a set of network source addresses, destination addresses, and/or service specific objectives. The virtual service request may be considered a request to route data across a domain associated with the service specific virtual topology base between at least one of the source addresses and at least one of the destination addresses. The service specific objective(s) may indicate a request to optimize the requested route(s) based on the attendant network characteristics. The service specific objective(s) may comprise lowest latency, lowest monetary cost, highest reliability (e.g. disjoint paths), highest bandwidth, etc. The message(s) may be transmitted via a Control Virtual Network Interface (CVNI), which may be a north bound interface between the strata. The service specific virtual topology base may request that a physical network control component perform an associated path computation(s), for example using a k-shortest path algorithm selected based on the service specific objective(s), for example, network link cost for lowest monetary cost, network link delay for lowest latency, shortest pair of paths for highest reliability, etc. The service specific virtual topology base may assemble the links and/or nodes associated with paths computed by the network control component into a service specific topology. The service specific virtual topology base may also reduce/virtualize the service specific topology, for example removing all degree-2 transit nodes. A degree-2 transit node may be a nonterminal network node (e.g. non-source and non-destination) which is traversed by at least one of the computed network paths and is connected to exactly two links which are traversed by the computed network paths which traverse the network node. The links incident to the removed degree-2 transit node may be merged to create a virtual link. The service specific topology may be further reduced/virtualized by removing all degree-1 transmit nodes (e.g. nonterminal network nodes connected to exactly one link traversed by computed path(s)). The resulting service specific virtual topology may be stored in the service specific virtual topology base and/or transmitted to the requested application stratum component. The service specific virtual topology data may comprise a reduced security risk, may be easily transmitted, and may be more easily interpreted by application stratum components than raw network stratum data. 
         [0029]    The present disclosure may employ a plurality of terms, some of which may be defined as discussed hereinafter. A provider network may be a wide-area network capable of providing data plane connectivity between geographically distinct sites. A service provider may be an entity responsible for providing WAN services to clients. It may also be the same as network provider when it owns the entire transport network providing the network services. A PNC may be the service provider&#39;s network controller, which may be responsible for coordinating actions with the DC controller. A DC operator may be an entity responsible for providing high capacity compute/computing and storage services to clients, for example a client of the service provider. A DC controller may be the DC Operator&#39;s controller, which may obtain WAN services from the service provider. A CVNI may be an interface for service advertisement and activation between the DC Controller and PNC. 
         [0030]      FIG. 1  is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a DC interconnection network  100  architecture. Network  100  may comprise a plurality of DCs  150 , which may be interconnected by a transport network  120 . The DCs  150  may be controlled by a DC controller  140  operating in an application stratum. The transport network  120  may be controlled by a PNC  130 , which may operate in the network stratum. The DC controller  140  may initiate a virtual network service negotiation with the PNC  130  via a CVNI  160 . The virtual network service negotiation initiation message may comprise source addresses and/or destination addresses representing DC endpoints  151  which may potentially be connected via the transport network  120 . The virtual network service negotiation initiation message may further comprise a service specific objective. The PNC  130  may compute path(s) across the transport network  120  that meet the service specific objective, create a service specific topology, virtualize the service specific topology, and return the service specific virtual topology to the DC controller  140 . The DC controller  140  may then employ the service specific virtual topology to determine which DC endpoints  151  should be connected. Upon determining the appropriate DC endpoint  151  connections, the DC controller  140  may request associated connection(s) via the PNC  130  and/or directly from the transport network  120  (e.g. via the transmitting DC endpoint  151 ) to support data migration between DCs  150 . 
         [0031]    A DC  150  may be a facility configured to store data, execute processes, and/or provide network services for clients, such as end users, application service providers, other networks, etc. A DC  150  may comprise a plurality of server racks  153 , which may comprise interconnected servers (e.g. interconnected by a core network). The servers may be components which provide the data storage, process execution, and/or network services. A DC  150  may comprise a network domain and/or a plurality of network sub-domains. NEs in a first domain and/or sub-domain may be segregated from NEs in a second domain and/or subdomain for security and/or organizational purposes. For example, NEs in a single domain/sub-domain may employ a common routing protocol and may be administered by a common management system. Communications may pass between domains at DC endpoints  151 , which may provide security, network address translation, protocol translation, and other inter-domain management functions for the DC  150  domain. DC endpoints  151  may comprise, for example, border routers, Network Address Translation (NAT) devices, and/or other devices that support inter-domain communication. DC endpoints  151  may operate in the network stratum and server racks  153  may operate in the network stratum and/or the application stratum. 
         [0032]    In some cases, a plurality of DCs  150  may be owned and/or controlled by a single telecommunications operator. By employing cloud computing principles, an operator may dynamically allocate DC  150  resources (e.g. server processor usage, storage space, etc.) in a plurality of DCs  150  to a single client. As such, data may be transmitted between DCs  150  to support network resource load balancing as network resource (e.g. server) utilization changes. In another embodiment, data may be transferred between DCs  150  in the case of equipment failure, security threats, natural disasters, etc. A provider may or may not own/control the transport network  120  that supports connectivity between the DCs  150 . A telecommunications operator may employ a DC controller  140 , which may be a NE configured to initiate data transfers between the DCs  150 . A DC controller  140  may operate in an application stratum and may manage data transfers in response to client requests and/or other application initiated changes. For example, a DC controller  140  may initiate a data transfer when an application wishes to move a virtual machine between DCs  150 , when an application indicates latency at a certain DC  150  has become unacceptable for the application&#39;s needs, based on a direct client interaction with an application, when an application indicates a need for a backup, etc. A DC controller  140  may or may not operate in the same domain as any of the DCs  150 . The DC controller  140  may operate in a different domain from the PNC  130  and the transport network  120 . 
         [0033]    DCs  150  may be connected by transport network  120 . Transport network  120  may comprise a plurality of NEs configured to forward data (e.g. a data forwarding plane). For example, the transport network  120  may comprise a plurality of routers, switches, gateways, etc., which may act as network nodes. The NEs may be connected by electrical, optical, and/or electro-optical connections (e.g. cables, fibers, etc.), which may function as links connecting the nodes. The transport network  120  may operate in the network stratum. For example, the transport network  120  NEs may employ Generalized Multi-Protocol Label Switching (GMPLS), Open Shortest Path First (OSPF), OSPF-Traffic Engineering (OSPF-TE), IP, Media Access Control (MAC), Virtual Local Area Network (VLAN), Virtual Extensible Local Area Network (VXLAN), Openflow, or other routing protocols to forward data across the transport network  120  between the DCs  150 . Transport network  120  may comprise one or more domains, and may not share a domain with any of the DCs  150  and/or DC controller  140 . 
         [0034]    PNC  130  may be configured to manage the transport network  120 . PNC  130  may operate in the network stratum and may operate in the same domain as the transport network  120  and a different domain from the DCs  150  and/or or the DC controller  140 . The PNC  130  may compute and/or provision paths across transport network  120 . PNC  130  may maintain an awareness of transport network  120  resource usage and/or topology. For example, PNC  130  may comprise a Path Computation Element (PCE). PNC  130  may also be configured to abstract such data upon request for use by application stratum components. PNC  130  may be configured to control transport network  120  via a Control Data Plane Interface (CDPI)  170 , which may be implemented as a northbound interface or an east-west interface. A northbound interface may be any interface that supports communication between OSI layers and an east-west interface may be any interface that supports communication between components in the same OSI layer. For example CDPI  170  may be implemented in Openflow, GMPLS, PCE Protocol (PCEP), Digital Signal 1 (T−1), etc. PNC  130  may also be configured to communicate with the DC controller  140  via a CVNI  160 . CVNI  160  may be considered a northbound interface as CVNI may support communication between the PNC  130  in the network stratum and the DC controller  130  in the application stratum. As CVNI  160  may support communication between strata and between domains, CVNI  160  may be considered an inter-domain northbound interface. CVNI  160  may be implemented in JavaScript Object Notation (JSON) protocol, Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (ALTO) protocol, Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP), etc. 
         [0035]    Upon determining that an application may require data to be transmitted between DCs  150 , the DC controller  140  may initiate a virtual network service negotiation with the PNC  130  via CVNI  160 . The DC controller  140  initiation message may comprise DC endpoints  151  as the network source(s) and/or network destination(s) of the data that is to be transferred via the transport network  120 . The DC controller  140  request may further comprise a service specific objective such as lowest latency, lowest monetary cost, highest reliability, highest bandwidth, etc. The PNC  130  may compute a plurality of paths across transport network  120  that meet the service specific objective. For example, the path computation may take the form of a k-shortest path algorithm. Network stratum components may not natively be configured to understand application layer service objectives. As such, PNC  130  may translate the application layer virtual network service initiation message into an equivalent network stratum request by interpreting the service specific objective and selecting an appropriate k-shortest path algorithm. The PNC  130  may create a service specific topology that comprises all links and nodes positioned along any computed path that meets the service specific objective. Such service specific topology may be substantially reduced from the topology of transport network  120  and may represent only topology information relevant to the DC controller&#39;s  140  request. PNC  130  may also virtualize the service specific topology by removing all degree-2 transit nodes and attendant links and replacing them with a virtual link. A degree-2 transit node may be a nonterminal network node (e.g. non-source and non-destination) that is traversed by at least one of the computed network paths and is connected to exactly two links that are traversed by the computed network paths that traverse the network node. PNC  130  may also remove all degree-1 transmit nodes (e.g. nonterminal network nodes connected to exactly one link traversed by computed path(s)), which may also be referred to as stub nodes. Virtualization may remove extraneous data from the service specific topology. The resulting service specific virtual topology may be forwarded to the DC controller  140 . The service specific virtual topology may comprise sufficient data to allow the DC controller  140  to make informed routing decisions between DCs  150 , while providing data in a user friendly manner that is easily usable by application stratum components. The use of a service specific virtual topology may avoid inundating the DC controller  140  with large amounts of topology data that is irrelevant to the virtual network service negotiation initiation message. The use of a service specific virtual topology may also support network security by allowing the PNC  130  to mask sensitive data relating to the architecture of transport network  120  and prevent such sensitive data from being transferred to another potentially rival telecommunications operator. Based on the service specific virtual topology, the DC controller  140  may select appropriate DC endpoints  151  for data transfer, select optimal paths from the reduced topology data, and initiate communications between the DCs  150  along the selected paths. For example, the paths may be provisioned via a cross stratum communication with PNC  130  or requested directly via a DC endpoint  151  request to transport network  120  using an east-west interface. 
         [0036]    As discussed above, network  100  may address data a center interconnection (DCI) serving traffic flows between separate DCs. One of the characteristics of this network  100  architecture is that the provider network (e.g. transport network  120 ) may be shared with other client traffic. Another characteristic of network  100  is the control separation of DC  150  and provider network (e.g. transport network  120 ). Because of this separation, seamless orchestration may be employed between the DC controller  140  and the PNC  130 . Network  100  may be deployed in a plurality of embodiments. In a first embodiment, a network provider&#39;s DCs  150  may be interconnected via network provider&#39;s transport network  120 . The separation of DC  150  and network  120  control may be a consequence of corporate organization or skill sets, but the network controller (e.g. PNC  130 ) may trust the DC controller  140 . In a second embodiment, third party DCs  150  may be interconnected via the network provider&#39;s transport network  120 . For the first embodiment, the DC controller  140  may act as an internal client to the PNC  130 . For the second embodiment, the DC controller  140  may act as an external client to the PNC  130 . The second embodiment may require tighter control in terms of policy, security and the degree of information sharing between DC  150  and network  120 . Network  100  may depict a high-level network architectural context for these embodiments. The service provider&#39;s transport network  120  may support a number of different client applications including DC  150  interconnection. 
         [0037]    To support the embodiments discussed herein, several assumptions may be made. The DC controller  140  may be aware of all DC endpoint  151  interfaces that are connected to the provider network  120 . Also, a data plane connection between each DC endpoint  151  interface and a corresponding network provider endpoint interface (e.g. a user-network interfaces (UNIs) of transport network  120 ) may have been established prior to communications between the DC controller  140  and the PNC  130 . Dynamic establishment of a data plane connection may be employed in some cases to support dynamic attachment to the provider network (e.g. transport network  120 ), for example via wireless access technologies. In addition, a service contract may be in force between the DC  150  operator and the service provider that sets the relevant policies regarding the operation of the service(s) available to the DC operator and by extension to the DC controller  140 . The PNC  130  may also be aware of the provider network&#39;s (e.g. transport network  120 ) endpoint interfaces that are connected to DCs  150  operated by the DC operator and covered by the service contract. An authentication mechanism that supports dynamic attachment to the provider network (e.g. via wireless access technologies) may be employed in some embodiments. The DC controller  140  may have full visibility of (e.g. access to and/or awareness of) each DC  150  under its control. This visibility may include DC  150  resource information, DC  150  location information, interfaces to transport networks  120  and other user/application related information. 
         [0038]    For the DC  150  interconnection application, the client controller may be the DC controller  140 , which may be an internal entity or an external entity with respect to the relationship with the service provider. In some embodiments, each DC  150  may have a local DC controller  140 , and these DC controllers  140  may form a confederacy or hierarchy to interface the PNC  130 . For purposes of this disclosure, a single logical DC controller  140  may be assumed to connect to a single logical PNC  130 . The DC controller  140  may be a client to the PNC  130 . The DC controller  140  may be a software agent operating on behalf of the DC operator and may be responsible for coordinating WAN resources to meet the requirements of the applications hosted in the DCs  150 . 
         [0039]    The PNC  130  may be a software agent operating on behalf of the service provider. The PNC  130  may be responsible for advertising to clients (e.g. the DC controller  140 ) available connectivity services and instantiating services requested by those clients. The present disclosure may provide benefits for both DC providers and service providers, such as improving optical transport network control and management flexibility (e.g. ability to deploy third party client management/control systems) and the development of service offerings by network virtualization. The CVNI  160  may enable programmatic and virtual control of optical transport networks (e.g. transport network  120 ) by allowing applications to have greater visibility of and control over connections carrying their data, and the monitoring and protection of these connections, subject to operator policy. 
         [0040]      FIG. 2  is a schematic diagram of another embodiment of a DC interconnection network  200  architecture. Network  200  may comprise an application stratum component  240  and a PNC  230 , which may be substantially similar to DC controller  140  and PNC  130 , respectively. Network  200  may also comprise a plurality of openflow enabled NEs  221 , a plurality of GMPLS/Automatically Switched Optical Network (ASON) enabled NEs  222 , or combinations thereof. NEs  221  and/or  222  may act as nodes and/or links in a transport network such as transport network  120  and may be employed to perform routing and other data plane functions, such as accepting path reservations and/or forwarding data between DCs (e.g. DC between endpoints  151 ). The PNC  230  may virtualize topology of NEs  221  and/or  222 , which may operate in a software defined network (SDN) and make such virtualized topology available to the application stratum component  240 . 
         [0041]    Application stratum component  240  may comprise a plurality of components and/or functions which may manage service specific network tasks related to application resources and/or services. The application stratum may comprise a Cross Stratum Optimization (CSO)  241  component, a Bandwidth on Demand (BoD)  243  component, and a Cloud Bursting (CB)  245  component. CSO  241 , BoD  243 , and CB  245  may each perform application service related tasks and may be implemented in software, firmware, and/or hardware. CSO  241  may be configured to determine and/or manage optimized resource provisioning (e.g. across a transport network such as transport network  120 ) as requested by an associated application by utilizing data provided by both the application stratum and the network stratum. BoD  243  may be configured to manage bandwidth capacity (e.g. across a transport network) for various applications and dynamically modify bandwidth allocations for such applications to account for communication bursts. CB  245  may be configured implement network cloud bursting. Cloud bursting may be an application deployment model in which an application operates in a private cloud (e.g. in a single DC such as a DC  150 ) during periods of normal demand and operates in a public cloud (e.g. a plurality of DCs, for example that may be owned by a plurality of operators) during periods of increased demand (e.g. demand spikes.) As such, CB  245  may be configured to obtain addition resources on demand to support cloud based application. Application stratum component  240  may comprise additional components as needed to provision communication paths across a transport network based on application needs in order support inter-DC computing. 
         [0042]    PNC  230  may comprise a physical network control and management  217  layer and an abstraction/virtualization control and management  237  layer. The physical network control and management  217  layer may comprise a plurality of components and/or functions which may directly manage NEs operating as network nodes (e.g. in a transport network), such as NEs  221  and/or  222 . The physical network control and management  217  layer may comprise a network resource/topology discovery  211  component, a quality of service (QoS) management  212  component, a path computation  213  component, a network monitoring  214  component, a provisioning  215  component, and a restoration/troubleshooting  216  component. Such components and/or functions may be implemented in hardware, software, or firmware. Network resource/topology discovery  211  component may be configured to determine and/or store the manner in which transport network nodes are connected (e.g. topology) and determine and/or store the transmission and/or computational capabilities (e.g. resources) of network links and/or nodes. Such resources may comprise total resources and/or resources available at a specified time. For example, the resource/topology discovery  211  component may comprise a Traffic Engineering Database (TED). QoS management  212  component may be configured to determine and/or allocate transport network resources to ensure minimum resources are available (e.g. bandwidth) for a specified task at a specified time. Path computation  213  component may be configured to compute optimized data path(s) across the transport network, for example via the resource and/or topology data gathered and/or stored by resource/topology discovery  211  component. For example, the path computation  213  component may comprise a PCE, an IP routing management device, a GMPLS routing management device, an Ethernet Management Information Base (MIB), etc. Network monitoring  214  component may be configured to monitor the health of the transport network and related components and alert a network administrator of network faults, slowdowns, or other problematic behavior. Provisioning  215  component may be configured to allocate resources of transport network nodes for specific tasks and inform the affected nodes of the allocation. Restoration/trouble shooting  216  component may be configured to determine the nature of network problems (e.g. trouble shooting), and/or attempt to repair and/or bypass the affected components. 
         [0043]    The abstraction/virtualization control and management  237  layer may comprise a plurality of components configured to abstract and/or generalize data from the physical network control and management  217  layer for use by application stratum. The abstraction/virtualization control and management  237  layer may communicate with the physical network control and management  217  layer and translate and/or map physical network data (e.g. related to the transport network) into an abstract form. The abstraction/virtualization control and management  237  layer may comprise an abstract topology base  231 , a service specific virtual topology base  232 , an application cataloging/scheduling  233  component, a monetization transaction engine  234 , a virtual monitoring  235  component, and an application (APP) profile translation  236  component. Such components and/or functions may be implemented in hardware, software, or firmware. The abstract topology base  231  may be configured to generate and/or store an abstracted version of the network topology, which may be received from the network resource/topology discovery  211  component. For example, the abstract topology base  231  may mask network topology and/or network resource data by removing network nodes and/or links and replacing them with virtual nodes and/or links, mask node and/or link identifiers, and/or employ other abstraction techniques. A service specific virtual (SSV) topology base  232  may be configured to request a path computation from path computation component  213  based on a service specific objective, create a service specific topology, virtualize the service specific topology, and store and/or send the service specific virtual topology to the application stratum component  240 . The application cataloging/scheduling  233  component may be configured to track applications wishing to employ network resources and order such use of resources over time. The monetization transaction engine  234  may determine, store, allocate, and/or communicate monetary costs incurred by the use of transport network resources, and/or report same to operator(s) of the transport network and/or operator(s) of the application stratum component network (e.g. DC  150  operator). The virtual monitoring  235  component may monitor the health of virtual machines operating in the transport network and repair, bypass, and/or alert a network administrator in case of associated problems. The application profile translation  236  component may be configured to translate application profiles received from the application stratum for use by the network stratum. 
         [0044]    Openflow NE  221  may comprise one or more NEs configured to perform electrical based data forwarding and/or routing functions in a transport network by employing an Openflow protocol. Each Openflow NE  221  may comprise a flow table and may route packets according to the flow table. The flow tables may be populated with flow data by the physical network control and management  217  layer components, which may allow the physical network control and management  217  layer to control the behavior of the Openflow NEs  221 . GMPLS/ASON enabled NEs  222  may comprise one or more NEs configured to perform optical based data forwarding and/or routing functions in a transport network by employing a GMPLS protocol and/or an ASON protocol. Each GMPLS/ASON enabled NE  222  may comprise a routing table that may be populated with labels (e.g. wavelengths) and may forward, switch, convert, and/or regenerate optical signals based on the routing table data. The routing table may be populated with data by the physical network control and management  217  layer components, which may allow the physical network control and management  217  layer to control the behavior of the GMPLS/ASON enabled NEs  222 . It should be noted that NEs  221  and  222  are included as exemplary types data plane NEs. Many other optical, electrical, and/or optical/electrical NEs may be employed within the scope of the present disclosure. Also, a transport network may or may not employ both NEs  221  and  222 . If both NEs  221  and  222  are employed in a single transport network, such NEs may be arranged in separate domains to support the use of different control and/or routing protocols. 
         [0045]    The PNC  230  may be coupled to the application stratum component  240  via a CVNI  260 , which may be substantially similar to CVNI  160 . The PNC  230  may be coupled to Openflow NE  221  via an Openflow enabled Open Interface  271  and coupled to GMPLS/ASON enabled NE  222  via a GMPLS control interface  272 , respectively. By employing interfaces  160 ,  271  and  272 , PNC  230  may communicate with both the application stratum and the network stratum. For example, PNC  230  may receive a virtual network service negotiation initiation message from the application stratum component  240  (e.g. from CSO  241 , BoD  243 , and/or CB  245 ) via CVNI  160 . The request may be routed to the service specific virtual topology base  232 . The service specific virtual topology base  232  may obtain source addresses, destination addresses, and service specific objective(s) from the virtual network service negotiation initiation message and may request an associated path computation from the path computation  213  component. The path computation  213  component may compute k-shortest paths across NEs  221  and/or  222  based on information from other physical network control and management  217  layer components (e.g. resource/topology discovery  211  component, QoS management  212  component, provisioning  215  component, etc.) Such information may be obtained (e.g. by resource/topology discovery  211  component) from NEs  221  and/or  222  via interfaces  271  and/or  272 , respectively. The path computation  213  component may return the computed k-shortest paths to service specific virtual topology base  232 , which may create a service specific topology from the computed paths and may virtualize such topology. The service specific virtual topology base  232  may store the service specific virtual topology for later use and/or may forward the service specific virtual topology to the application stratum component  240  over CVNI  260  as part of a virtual network service negotiation response. The application stratum component  240  may employ the service specific virtual topology to make routing decisions based on the abstracted/virtualized data. The application stratum component  240  may then provision any needed network paths via CVNI  260 , service specific virtual topology base  232 , abstract topology base  231 , provisioning  215  component, Open interface  271  and/or GMPLS control interface  272 . 
         [0046]      FIG. 3  is a schematic diagram of an embodiment of a NE  300  which may act as a node within a DC interconnection network architecture, such as a PNC  130  and/or  230 . NE  300  may be configured to receive virtual network service negotiation initiation messages, compute service specific virtual topologies, and transmit virtual network service negotiation responses to the application stratum. NE  300  may be implemented in a single node or the functionality of NE  300  may be implemented in a plurality of nodes. In some embodiments NE  300  may also act as other node(s) in network  100  and/or  200 , such as DC controller  140 , application stratum component  240 , a server in server racks  153 , a NE in transport network  120 , NE  221 , and/or NE  222 . One skilled in the art will recognize that the term NE encompasses a broad range of devices of which NE  300  is merely an example. NE  300  is included for purposes of clarity of discussion, but is in no way meant to limit the application of the present disclosure to a particular NE embodiment or class of NE embodiments. At least some of the features/methods described in the disclosure may be implemented in a network apparatus or component such as a NE  300 . For instance, the features/methods in the disclosure may be implemented using hardware, firmware, and/or software installed to run on hardware. The NE  300  may be any device that transports frames through a network, e.g. a switch, router, bridge, server, a client, etc. As shown in  FIG. 3 , the NE  300  may comprise transceivers (Tx/Rx)  310 , which may be transmitters, receivers, or combinations thereof. A Tx/Rx  310  may be coupled to plurality of downstream ports  320  (e.g. southbound interfaces) for transmitting and/or receiving frames from other nodes and a Tx/Rx  310  coupled to plurality of upstream ports  350  (e.g. northbound interfaces) for transmitting and/or receiving frames from other nodes, respectively. NE  300  may comprise additional TX/Rxs  310  and/or ports as needed for a particular embodiment, for example to support east-west interfaces. A processor  330  may be coupled to the Tx/Rxs  310  to process the frames and/or determine which nodes to send frames to. The processor  330  may comprise one or more multi-core processors and/or memory devices  332 , which may function as data stores, buffers, etc. Processor  330  may be implemented as a general processor or may be part of one or more application specific integrated circuits (ASICs) and/or digital signal processors (DSPs). Processor  330  may comprise a virtualization module  334 , which may implement the functionality of service specific virtual topology base  232 . In an alternative embodiment, the virtualization module  334  may be implemented as instructions stored in memory  332 , which may be executed by processor  330 . In another alternative embodiment, the virtualization module  334  may be implemented on separate NEs. The downstream ports  320  and/or upstream ports  350  may contain electrical and/or optical transmitting and/or receiving components. 
         [0047]    It is understood that by programming and/or loading executable instructions onto the NE  300 , at least one of the processor  330 , virtualization module  334 , downstream ports  320 , Tx/Rxs  310 , memory  332 , and/or upstream ports  350  are changed, transforming the NE  300  in part into a particular machine or apparatus, e.g. a multi-core forwarding architecture, having the novel functionality taught by the present disclosure. It is fundamental to the electrical engineering and software engineering arts that functionality that can be implemented by loading executable software into a computer can be converted to a hardware implementation by well-known design rules. Decisions between implementing a concept in software versus hardware typically hinge on considerations of stability of the design and numbers of units to be produced rather than any issues involved in translating from the software domain to the hardware domain. Generally, a design that is still subject to frequent change may be preferred to be implemented in software, because re-spinning a hardware implementation is more expensive than re-spinning a software design. Generally, a design that is stable that will be produced in large volume may be preferred to be implemented in hardware, for example in an ASIC, because for large production runs the hardware implementation may be less expensive than the software implementation. Often a design may be developed and tested in a software form and later transformed, by well-known design rules, to an equivalent hardware implementation in an application specific integrated circuit that hardwires the instructions of the software. In the same manner as a machine controlled by a new ASIC is a particular machine or apparatus, likewise a computer that has been programmed and/or loaded with executable instructions may be viewed as a particular machine or apparatus. 
         [0048]      FIG. 4  is a flow chart of an embodiment of a method  400  of generating a service specific virtual topology. For example, method  400  may be implemented in a PNC  130  and/or  230 . At block  401 , a virtual network service negotiation initiation message may be received from an application stratum component (e.g. a DC controller  140  and/or application stratum component  240 ). The initiation message may comprise at least one network source address, at least one network destination address, and a service specific objective. The network source address(es) and network destination address(es) may comprise the addresses of DC endpoints, such as DC endpoints  151 , associated with potential source and destination DCs associated with a potential data migration. 
         [0049]    At block  403 , a plurality of paths between the network source address(es) and the network destination addresses may be computed that meet the service specific objective. For example, a service specific virtual topology base (e.g. service specific virtual topology base  232 ) may request a path computation component (e.g. path computation component  213 ) perform a k-shortest path computation. The service specific virtual topology base may determine which k-shortest path algorithm to employ based on the service specific objective. For example, a k-shortest paths algorithm based on network link delay may be employed when the service specific objective comprises lowest latency, a k-shortest paths algorithm based on network link cost may be employed when the service specific objective comprises lowest monetary cost, and/or k-shortest pair of paths algorithm may be employed when the service specific objective comprises highest reliability. A service specific virtual topology base may be required to map the service specific objective to an associated k-shortest path algorithm as a path computation component may not be natively configured to interpret a service specific objective (e.g. as a service specific objective may be general in nature and may not be concrete enough to be natively supported by network stratum components). 
         [0050]    At block  405 , a service specific topology may be produced that comprises all nodes and links on any path computed at block  403 . The service specific topology may be significantly reduced from a full network topology. As such, the service specific topology may comprise much less data and may be more easily employed by the application stratum. 
         [0051]    At block  407 , the service specific topology of block  405  may be virtualized by removing each transit degree-2 nodes and merging each transit degree-2 node&#39;s incident links to create a virtual link. The service specific topology may be further virtualized by removing all transit degree-1 nodes. The virtual link may comprise a routing cost and latency that is the sum of the costs and latency, respectively, of both links and the transit degree-2 node for the purposes of path computation. The virtual link may comprise a capacity (e.g. bandwidth) equal to the minimum capacity of the replaced links and/or node. Transit degree-1 and degree-2 nodes may be necessary from a routing and/or forwarding point of view and may accordingly be included in the computed paths. However, transit degree-1 and degree-2 nodes may be removed without negatively impacting the topology data from a pathing standpoint as transit degree-1 and degree-2 nodes may not have two entry links or two exit links and may not act as a decision point for determining a path. As such, transit degree-1 and degree-2 nodes may be necessary from a network stratum point of view, but may be irrelevant and/or burdensome from an application stratum point of view. 
         [0052]    At block  409 , the service specific virtual topology of block  407  may be stored in a service specific virtual topology base for later use (e.g. in response to additional virtual network service negotiation initiation messages). The service specific virtual topology may also be transmitted to application stratum the application stratum component of block  401  in a virtual network service negotiation response message. The service specific virtual topology may then be used by the application stratum (e.g. DC controller) for path/resource provisioning, scheduling, connection initiation, and/or other actions related to the transfer of the data between the source address(es) and the destination address(es) (e.g. between the DCs). 
         [0053]    As discussed above, the present disclosure may support pre-network connection information exchange and associated workflow. For example, method  400  may negotiate between a DC controller and a PNC. The actor that initiates negotiation may be the DC controller. As a client to the transport network, the DC controller may be interested in knowing relevant transport network resource information, for example, in light of DC interconnection. Transport network resource information may be expressed via a VNT. 
         [0054]    Initially, the DC controller may negotiate with the PNC to identify a set of endpoints (e.g. DC endpoints  151 ) the DC controller wishes to connect. As part of the negotiation, the DC controller may also express traffic characteristics that may be supported between endpoints by the VNT such as traffic demand (e.g. bandwidth), QoS requirements, and willingness to pay associated with DC endpoint interface pairs (e.g. as a service specific objective). In response, the PNC may provide a best available VNT or a list of multiple VNT connectivity options. The DC controller may negotiate multiple independent VNTs for different applications. Calendaring (e.g. supporting network connection at some future time) may also be supported. 
         [0055]    The VNT may be described as a set of nodes and links. The VNT external interfaces may correspond to physical ports, each representing a client user-network interface (UNI), which may act as a data plane connection between a client DC endpoint and provider network (e.g. transport network  120 ) endpoint. The internal interfaces (e.g. of the provider network) may be virtual and may or may not correspond to physical ports. To allow negotiation to take place, the correspondence between DC endpoint interface identifiers and provider network endpoint interface identifiers may be established. This may be accomplished using a manual process, for example by exchanging identifiers between DC operations and provider network operations personnel, and/or may be automated, for example by using a Link Layer Discovery Protocol (LLDP) to exchange endpoint identifiers at the UNIs. If the endpoint interfaces are under SDN control (e.g. OpenFlow) the exchange can be done using Openflow protocol PACKET_OUT and PACKET IN messages. By this exchange both the DC controller and the PNC can acquire the association between the DC endpoint identifiers (DC EPIDs) and the provider network endpoint identifiers (PN EPIDs). 
         [0056]    During virtual network service negotiation with the DC controller, the PNC may be the actor for creating a response to the DC controller with an associated VNT. If the DC endpoints are identified in the CVNI using the DC EPID, the PNC may translate each of these DC EPIDs to associated PN EPIDs before proceeding to process the request. If the endpoints are identified by the DC controller using the ID pair (DC EPID, PN EPID), the PNC may not access a translation service and may process the request using its own identifier from each ID pair. The PNC may provide a VNT in response to the DC controller. In order to provide a relevant VNT, the PNC may a request to a path computation entity of the PNC and may determine the feasibility of the request. The corresponding result may be sent by the PNC to the DC controller. The translation of the computed physical network paths to virtual network topology may be done based on the pre-negotiated policy and contract. For instance, the degree of detail for the VNT with respect to the computed physical network paths may be subject to the contract. The PNC may also be responsible for notifying the client (e.g. the DC controller) about topology changes, for example as the result of network additions. 
         [0057]    Several objects and associated parameters may be supported as part of a virtual network service negotiation initiation and/or response. A connectivity object may be employed to express VNT connection related information, such as: (i) point-point; (ii) point-multipoint; (iii) multi-destination (e.g. anycast); (iv) shared pool; and/or (v) other connectivity types. For each connectivity type, the directionality may be expressed as: (i) uni-directional; and/or (ii) bi-directional. A location information object may be employed to describe the DC endpoint interfaces associated with the connectivity object. For uni-directional connectivity, the source list and the destination list may be distinguished (e.g. in the information object). A QoS object may describe QoS traffic demand (e.g. bandwidth) and/or other QoS information associated with DC endpoint interface pairs (e.g. latency). 
         [0058]    A VNT, as discussed above, may be a client view of the transport network. The VNT may be the view that the network operator provides to the client (e.g. DC controller). The VNT may only show the relevant client endpoints (e.g. DC endpoints) and some level of network connectivity (which may depend on a granularity level negotiated between a client and the network), while hiding and condensing the real physical network topology. For example, a VNT may represent portions of a transport network (e.g. sub-networks) as virtual nodes, where each virtual node comprises the same input(s) and output(s) as the replaced subnetwork. Granularity as discussed herein may refer to the amount of topology data transmitted to the client (e.g. DC controller). For example, a low/coarse granularity view may condense a plurality of sub-networks into a single virtual node, a moderate granularity view may condense each sub-network into a separate virtual node, and a high/fine granularity view may show substantially all topology information with virtualization based on relevance to a request. 
         [0059]      FIG. 5  is a schematic diagram of an example network stratum network  500  topology. Network  500  may be employed as a transport network such as transport network  120 . Network  500  is disclosed purely as an example to support discussion of service specific virtual topology creation. Network  500  may comprise nodes A4, A9, A14, A17, A23, A28, B3, B4, B9, B16, B22, B28, C6, C8, C12, C17, C24, C29, D4, D6, D14, D16, D20, D30, E5, E8, E15, E17, E20, and E28. Such node may represent NEs, such as electrical and/or optical switches, routers, gateways, etc., positioned in a single and/or a plurality of domains. Such nodes may be connected via links as shown in  FIG. 5 . In an embodiment, a PNC, such as PNC  130 ,  230 , and/or other NE implementing method  400 , may receive a virtual network service negotiation initiation message indicating a limited set of potential communicating entities in the form of source address and destination address pairs (A4, B9), (A14, B4), (B28, E5), and (A17, D4). For the purposes of generating a service specific virtual topology, such nodes may each be considered to be terminal and/or non-transit nodes. Each terminal/non-transit node is illustrated in bold typeface to promote clarity of understanding. 
         [0060]      FIG. 6A  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific topology  600 A for a lowest latency service specific objective, which may be based on network  500  topology. For example, a virtual network service negotiation initiation message may indicate a service specific objective of lowest latency between source address and destination address pairs (A4, B9), (A14, B4), (B28, E5), and (A17, D4). A service specific virtual topology base may request a path computation between the terminal nodes of network  500  using a k-shortest path based on network link delay. As an example, value of k may be set to four (e.g. by the application stratum component or by the network stratum component). It should be noted that a value of four is purely an example and many other value may be employed. The specific virtual topology base may receive an associated path computation disclosing the four paths with lowest link delay between the terminal pairs and create a service specific topology by collecting all links and nodes along any computed path, which may result in service specific topology  600 A. 
         [0061]      FIG. 6B  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific virtual topology  600 B for a lowest latency service specific objective, which may be based on service specific topology  600 A. As discussed above, the service specific virtual topology base may virtualize topology  600 A by removing all transit degree-2 nodes. Nodes A23, B22, and C24 may each be transit nodes and may have exactly two incident links on network  600 A. As such, nodes A23, B22, and C24 may not be pathing decision points. Such nodes and their incident links may each be replaced with a single virtual link resulting in service specific virtual topology  600 B. 
         [0062]      FIG. 7A  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific topology  700 A for a lowest monetary cost service specific objective, which may be based on network  500  topology. For example, a virtual network service negotiation initiation message may indicate a service specific objective of lowest monetary cost between source address and destination address pairs (A4, B9), (A14, B4), (B28, E5), and (A17, D4). The PNC may request a k-shortest path computation based on network link network link cost (e.g. per length and/or aggregate cost for all links in the computed path). Topology  700 A may result from aggregating all nodes and links along such computed paths. 
         [0063]      FIG. 7B  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific virtual topology  700 B for a lowest monetary cost service specific objective, which may be based on service specific topology  700 A. As discussed above, the service specific virtual topology base may virtualize topology  700 A by removing all transit degree-2 nodes. Nodes B22, C29, and D6 may each be transit nodes and may have exactly two incident links in network  700 A. As such, nodes B22, C29, and D6 may not be pathing decision points. Such nodes and their incident links may each be replaced with a single virtual link resulting in service specific virtual topology  700 B. 
         [0064]      FIG. 8A  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific topology  800 A for a highest reliability service specific objective, which may be based on network  500  topology. For example, a virtual network service negotiation initiation message may indicate a service specific objective of highest reliability between source address and destination address pairs (A4, B9), (A14, B4), (B28, E5), and (A17, D4). The PNC may request a k-shortest disjoint pair of paths computation (e.g. where k equals two), where shortest paths may be judged my total routing costs. As an example, the path computation may result in the following paths and associated routing costs: 
         [0000]                                                                  Node List   Cost   Capacity                                        A4, A17, A28, B9   442   16           A4, A9, A23, B4, B9   541   28           A14, A17, A28, B9, B4   541   15           A14, A4, A9, A23, B4   577   17           B28, A28, B9, B3, E5   424   23           B28, B22, B16, B9, B4, A23, E5   674   21           A17, A28, B9, B3, D4   493   15           A17, A4, A9, A23, E5, E15, D4   897   16           A4, A17, A28, B9   442   16           A4, A9, A23, B4, B9   541   28           A14, A17, A28, B9, B4,   541   15           A14, A4, A9, A23, B4   577   17           B28, A28, B9, B3, E5   424   23           B28, B22, B16, B9, B4, A23, E5   674   21           A17, A28, B9, B3, D4   493   15           A17, A4, A9, A23, E5, E15, D4   897   16                        
As shown above, a pair of disjoint paths (e.g. two paths with no common transit links/nodes) are computed between each source node and each destination node. Disjoint paths may be reliable as any node or link failure along one path may be circumvented by employing the other path. Topology  800 A may result from aggregating all nodes and links along such computed paths as listed above.
 
         [0065]      FIG. 8B  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific virtual topology  800 B for a highest reliability service specific objective, which may be based on service specific topology  800 A. As discussed above, the service specific virtual topology base may virtualize topology  800 A by removing all transit degree-2 nodes. Nodes A9, B16, B22, and E15 may each be transit nodes and may have exactly two incident links in network  800 A. As such, nodes A9, B22, B16, and E15 may not be pathing decision points. Such nodes and their incident links may each be replaced with a single virtual link resulting in service specific virtual topology  800 B. 
         [0066]      FIG. 9A  is a schematic diagram of another example service specific topology  900 A for a highest reliability service specific objective, which may be based on network  500  topology. For example, a PNC may receive substantially the same request as in network  800 A, but may employ a different k-shortest disjoint pair of paths computation algorithm, which may result in the following paths and associated routing costs: 
         [0000]                                                                  Node List   Cost   Capacity                                        A4, A17, A28, B9   442   16           A4, A9, A23, B4, B9   541   28           A4, A17, A28, B9   442   16           A4, A9, A23, B4, B3, B9   583   28           A14, A17, A28, B9, B4   541   15           A14, A4, A9, A23, B4   577   17           A14, A17, A28, B9, B4   541   15           A14, A4, A9, A23, E5, B3, B4   706   17           B28, A28, B9, B3, E5   424   23           B28, B22, B16, B9, B4, A23, E5   674   21           B28, A28, A9, A23, E5   645   21           B28, B22, B16, B9, B3, E5   521   23           A17, A28, B9, B3, D4   493   15           A17, A4, A9, A23, E5, E15, D4   897   16           A17, A28, B9, C24, D4   589   19           A17, A4, A9, A23, B4, B3, D4   808   15                        
As shown above, a pair of disjoint paths (e.g. two paths with no common transit links/nodes) are computed between each source node and each destination node. Topology  900 A may result from aggregating all nodes and links along such computed paths as listed above.
 
         [0067]      FIG. 9B  is a schematic diagram of another example service specific virtual topology  900 B for a highest reliability service specific objective, which may be based on service specific topology  900 A. As discussed above, the service specific virtual topology base may virtualize topology  900 A by removing all transit degree-2 nodes. Nodes B16, B22, C24, and E15 may each be transit nodes and may have exactly two incident links in network  900 A. As such, nodes B16, B22, C24, and E15 may not be pathing decision points. Such nodes and their incident links may each be replaced with a single virtual link resulting in service specific virtual topology  900 B. 
         [0068]      FIG. 10A  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific topology  1000 A for a highest reliability service specific objective when employing three disjoint paths, which may be based on network  500  topology. For example, a PNC may receive substantially the same request as in network  700 A and/or  800 A, but may employ a k-shortest disjoint paths computation algorithm with a k value of three (e.g. three disjoint paths between each source and each destination), which may result in the following paths and associated routing costs: 
         [0000]                                                                  Node List   Cost   Capacity                                        A4, A17, A28, B9   442   16           A4, A9, A23, B4, B9   541   28           A4, A17, A28, B9   442   16           A4, A9, A23, B4, B3, B9   583   28           A4, A17, A28, B9   442   16           A4, A9, A23, E5, B3, B9   608   21           A14, A17, A28, B9, B4   541   15           A14, A4, A9, A23, B4   577   17           A14, A17, A28, B9, B4   541   15           A14, A4, A9, A23, E5, B3, B4   706   17           A14, A17, A28, B9, B4   541   15           A14, B28, A28, B16, B9, B3, B4   774   29           B28, A28, B9, B3, E5   424   23           B28, B22, B16, B9, B4, A23, E5   674   21           B28, A28, A9, A23, E5   645   21           B28, B22, B16, B9, B3, E5   521   23           B28, A28   111   37           B28, B22, C17, B16, B9, B3, E5   675   15           A17, A28, B9, B3, D4   493   15           A17, A4, A9, A23, E5, E15, D4   897   16           A17, A28, B9, C24, D4   589   19           A17, A4, A9, A23, B4, B3, D4   808   15           A17, A28, B9, B3, D4   493   15           A17, A4, A9, A23, E5, B3   695   16                        
As shown above, three disjoint paths (e.g. three paths with no common transit links/nodes) are computed between each source node and each destination node. Topology  1000 A may result from aggregating all nodes and links along such computed paths as listed above.
 
         [0069]      FIG. 10B  is a schematic diagram of an example service specific virtual topology  1000 B for a highest reliability service specific objective when employing three disjoint paths, which may be based on service specific topology  1000 A. As discussed above, the service specific virtual topology base may virtualize topology  1000 A by removing all transit degree-2 nodes. Nodes C17, C24, and E15 may each be transit nodes and may have exactly two incident links in network  1000 A. As such, nodes C17, C24, and E15 may not be pathing decision points. Such nodes and their incident links may each be replaced with a single virtual link resulting in service specific virtual topology  1000 B. 
         [0070]    As discussed above, network  500  topology may represent a full physical topology. Assuming that a client application only needs four pairs of communication nodes: (A4, B9), (A14, B4), (B28, E5), (A17, D4), networks  600 A,  700 A,  800 A,  900 A and  1000 A may represent different topologies generated by a k-shortest path algorithm for different objectives of optimization, for example lowest latency, lowest cost, and highest reliability. The resulting graphs may show different topology abstractions depending on the objective function. Such graphs and/or networks  600 B,  700 B,  800 B,  900 B and/or  1000 B may also result in pruning irrelevant nodes and links from network  500 . These example networks may show a use of objective functions, constraints, information hiding, and/or reduction to represent client service specific topology abstraction. 
         [0071]    In summary, there may be a number of factors to consider in VNT formulation. Such factors may include the granularity of VNT, for example an endpoint only view (e.g. lowest granularity) and/or a view with varying levels of granularity. Such factors may also include objective function of the topology, for example a general request with no particular objective function associated with the topology, a service specific request with a service specific objective such as latency minimal path, reliable path, max reservable bandwidth path, etc., and/or a request with multi objectives (e.g. a combination of multiple service specific objectives). Another factor to consider may include information hiding and reduction, which may be subject to a policy of the service provider and/or negotiation between client and service providers. Such information details may depend on a pricing model. For example, the willingness to pay more for details may be considered in the service provider&#39;s pricing model. 
         [0072]    At least one embodiment is disclosed and variations, combinations, and/or modifications of the embodiment(s) and/or features of the embodiment(s) made by a person having ordinary skill in the art are within the scope of the disclosure. Alternative embodiments that result from combining, integrating, and/or omitting features of the embodiment(s) are also within the scope of the disclosure. Where numerical ranges or limitations are expressly stated, such express ranges or limitations should be understood to include iterative ranges or limitations of like magnitude falling within the expressly stated ranges or limitations (e.g. from about 1 to about 10 includes, 2, 3, 4, etc.; greater than 0.10 includes 0.11, 0.12, 0.13, etc.). For example, whenever a numerical range with a lower limit, R 1 , and an upper limit, R u , is disclosed, any number falling within the range is specifically disclosed. In particular, the following numbers within the range are specifically disclosed: R=R 1 +k*(R u −R 1 ), wherein k is a variable ranging from 1 percent to 100 percent with a 1 percent increment, i.e., k is 1 percent, 2 percent, 3 percent, 4 percent, 7 percent, . . . , 70 percent, 71 percent, 72 percent, . . . , 97 percent, 96 percent, 97 percent, 98 percent, 99 percent, or 100 percent. Moreover, any numerical range defined by two R numbers as defined in the above is also specifically disclosed. Unless otherwise stated, the term “about” means±10% of the subsequent number. Use of the term “optionally” with respect to any element of a claim means that the element is required, or alternatively, the element is not required, both alternatives being within the scope of the claim. Use of broader terms such as comprises, includes, and having should be understood to provide support for narrower terms such as consisting of, consisting essentially of, and comprised substantially of. Accordingly, the scope of protection is not limited by the description set out above but is defined by the claims that follow, that scope including all equivalents of the subject matter of the claims. Each and every claim is incorporated as further disclosure into the specification and the claims are embodiment(s) of the present disclosure. The discussion of a reference in the disclosure is not an admission that it is prior art, especially any reference that has a publication date after the priority date of this application. The disclosure of all patents, patent applications, and publications cited in the disclosure are hereby incorporated by reference, to the extent that they provide exemplary, procedural, or other details supplementary to the disclosure. 
         [0073]    While several embodiments have been provided in the present disclosure, it should be understood that the disclosed systems and methods might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the present disclosure. The present examples are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the intention is not to be limited to the details given herein. For example, the various elements or components may be combined or integrated in another system or certain features may be omitted, or not implemented. 
         [0074]    In addition, techniques, systems, subsystems, and methods described and illustrated in the various embodiments as discrete or separate may be combined or integrated with other systems, modules, techniques, or methods without departing from the scope of the present disclosure. Other items shown or discussed as coupled or directly coupled or communicating with each other may be indirectly coupled or communicating through some interface, device, or intermediate component whether electrically, mechanically, or otherwise. Other examples of changes, substitutions, and alterations are ascertainable by one skilled in the art and could be made without departing from the spirit and scope disclosed herein. Atty.