File size: 10,519 Bytes
e24828f e2232ed e24828f e903635 e24828f e2232ed e903635 28aa8b7 e2232ed 28aa8b7 e903635 34197ae e903635 e24828f e903635 8194e3d e903635 e2232ed e903635 e2232ed e903635 e2232ed e24828f e2232ed e903635 8194e3d e2232ed e903635 e2232ed e903635 e2232ed e903635 8194e3d e903635 8194e3d e903635 e2232ed e24828f e903635 e2232ed e903635 e2232ed |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 |
---
model-index:
- name: notus-7b-v1
results: []
datasets:
- argilla/ultrafeedback-binarized-avg-rating-for-dpo
language:
- en
base_model: alignment-handbook/zephyr-7b-sft-full
library_name: transformers
pipeline_tag: text-generation
tags:
- dpo
- preference
- ultrafeedback
license: apache-2.0
---
# Model Card for Notus 7B v1
<div align="center">
<img src="https://cdn-uploads.huggingface.co/production/uploads/60f0608166e5701b80ed3f02/LU-vKiC0R7UxxITrwE1F_.png" alt="Image was artificially generated by Dalle-3 via ChatGPT Pro"/>
</div>
Notus is going to be a collection of fine-tuned models using DPO, similarly to Zephyr, but mainly focused
on the Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) step, aiming to incorporate preference feedback into the LLMs
when fine-tuning those. Notus models are intended to be used as assistants via chat-like applications, and
are evaluated with the MT-Bench, AlpacaEval, and LM Evaluation Harness benchmarks, to be directly compared
with Zephyr fine-tuned models also using DPO.
## Model Details
### Model Description
- **Developed by:** Argilla, Inc. (based on HuggingFace H4 and MistralAI previous efforts and amazing work)
- **Shared by:** Argilla, Inc.
- **Model type:** GPT-like 7B model DPO fine-tuned
- **Language(s) (NLP):** Mainly English
- **License:** Apache 2.0 (same as Zephyr 7B SFT and Mistral 7B v0.1)
- **Finetuned from model:** [`alignment-handbook/zephyr-7b-sft-full`](https://huggingface.co/alignment-handbook/zephyr-7b-sft-full)
### Model Sources
- **Repository:** https://github.com/argilla-io/notus-7b
- **Paper:** N/A
- **Demo:** https://argilla-notus-chat-ui.hf.space/
### Model Date
Notus 7B v1 was trained along November, 2023. And the data as generated by GPT-4 without the usage of external resources, has a cutoff at September, 2021.
## Evaluation
### LM Eval Harness
We ran the evaluation using [`EleutherAI/lm-eval-harness`](https://github.com/EleutherAI/lm-evaluation-harness/tree/big-refactor) from the `big-refactor` branch, aiming to mimic the [Open LLM Leaderboard by HuggingFace H4](https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard), but running everything on our VMs instead, as we're still experimenting.
From a first evaluation on the benchmark, we could see that Notus 7B DPO **slightly improved** compared to Zephyr 7B Beta/Alpha and Mistral 7B as we see from the average metric of 7 tasks from the leaderboard.
| Model | Average ⬆️ | ARC (25-s) ⬆️ | HellaSwag (10-s) ⬆️ | MMLU (5-s) ⬆️ | TruthfulQA (MC2) (0-s) ⬇️ | Winogrande (5-s) ⬇️ | GSM8K (5-s) ⬆️ | DROP (3-s) ⬇️ |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
|[mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1](https://huggingface.co/mistralai/Mistral-7B-v0.1) | 50.32 | 59.58 | 83.31 | 64.16 | 42.15 | 78.37 | 18.12 | 6.14 |
|[HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-alpha](https://huggingface.co/HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-alpha) | 52.4 | 61.01 | 84.04 | 61.39 | 57.9 | 78.61 | 14.03 | 9.82 |
|[HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta](https://huggingface.co/HuggingFaceH4/zephyr-7b-beta) | 52.15 | 62.03 | 84.36 | 61.07 | 57.45 | 77.74 | 12.74 | 9.66 |
| **Ours** | **54.09** | 64.25 | 84.90 | 61.69 | 52.77 | 74.51 | 39.5 | 0.98 |
Anyway, we will also add our model to the [Open LLM Leaderboard](https://huggingface.co/spaces/HuggingFaceH4/open_llm_leaderboard) queue to be evaluated on Hugging Face's end to ensure that the produced results match the same ones, as we found some inconsistencies for DROP using the `big-refactor` branch on `lm-eval-harness`.
### MT Bench (Coming soon!)
### Alpaca Eval (Coming soon!)
## Training Details
### Training Hardware
We used a VM with 8 x A100 40GB hosted in Lambda Labs.
### Training Data
We used a slightly curated version of [`openbmb/UltraFeedback`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/openbmb/UltraFeedback), named [`argilla/ultrafeedback-binarized-avg-rating-for-dpo`](https://huggingface.co/argilla/ultrafeedback-binarized-avg-rating-for-dpo).
### Training hyperparameters
The following hyperparameters were used during training:
- learning_rate: 5e-07
- train_batch_size: 8
- eval_batch_size: 4
- seed: 42
- distributed_type: multi-GPU
- num_devices: 8
- total_train_batch_size: 64
- total_eval_batch_size: 32
- optimizer: Adam with betas=(0.9,0.999) and epsilon=1e-08
- lr_scheduler_type: linear
- lr_scheduler_warmup_ratio: 0.1
- num_epochs: 3
### Training results
| Training Loss | Epoch | Step | Validation Loss | Rewards/chosen | Rewards/rejected | Rewards/accuracies | Rewards/margins | Logps/rejected | Logps/chosen | Logits/rejected | Logits/chosen |
|:-------------:|:-----:|:----:|:---------------:|:--------------:|:----------------:|:------------------:|:---------------:|:--------------:|:------------:|:---------------:|:-------------:|
| 0.5051 | 0.1 | 100 | 0.5180 | 0.1475 | -0.3954 | 0.7183 | 0.5429 | -246.6286 | -297.5412 | -2.7438 | -3.0431 |
| 0.4321 | 0.21 | 200 | 0.4375 | 0.1353 | -0.9529 | 0.7540 | 1.0882 | -252.2036 | -297.6632 | -2.7578 | -3.0543 |
| 0.3848 | 0.31 | 300 | 0.4301 | -0.4813 | -1.8921 | 0.7302 | 1.4107 | -261.5956 | -303.8301 | -2.7592 | -3.0508 |
| 0.3777 | 0.42 | 400 | 0.4091 | -0.8597 | -2.5306 | 0.7698 | 1.6709 | -267.9805 | -307.6138 | -2.7476 | -3.0474 |
| 0.3559 | 0.52 | 500 | 0.4332 | -1.0424 | -2.6019 | 0.7619 | 1.5595 | -268.6939 | -309.4406 | -2.2960 | -2.6106 |
| 0.4178 | 0.62 | 600 | 0.3934 | -0.6434 | -2.4837 | 0.7659 | 1.8404 | -267.5121 | -305.4503 | -2.5487 | -2.8508 |
| 0.4206 | 0.73 | 700 | 0.4058 | -1.4700 | -3.5113 | 0.7857 | 2.0413 | -277.7877 | -313.7168 | -2.5679 | -2.8727 |
| 0.4323 | 0.83 | 800 | 0.3929 | -0.9025 | -2.6935 | 0.7897 | 1.7910 | -269.6095 | -308.0414 | -2.6213 | -2.9202 |
| 0.3706 | 0.93 | 900 | 0.3903 | -1.1122 | -3.0257 | 0.8056 | 1.9135 | -272.9316 | -310.1388 | -2.5428 | -2.8416 |
| 0.0496 | 1.04 | 1000 | 0.3991 | -1.4248 | -4.1245 | 0.8016 | 2.6997 | -283.9196 | -313.2651 | -2.5093 | -2.8150 |
| 0.0723 | 1.14 | 1100 | 0.3999 | -1.8789 | -4.5317 | 0.7897 | 2.6528 | -287.9914 | -317.8056 | -2.5170 | -2.8242 |
| 0.0481 | 1.25 | 1200 | 0.4191 | -2.6211 | -5.5294 | 0.7817 | 2.9083 | -297.9687 | -325.2281 | -2.5139 | -2.8109 |
| 0.0432 | 1.35 | 1300 | 0.4070 | -2.0605 | -5.0460 | 0.8056 | 2.9855 | -293.1345 | -319.6214 | -2.5153 | -2.8121 |
| 0.0402 | 1.45 | 1400 | 0.4001 | -2.2445 | -5.0942 | 0.7937 | 2.8497 | -293.6164 | -321.4614 | -2.4383 | -2.7388 |
| 0.0529 | 1.56 | 1500 | 0.4066 | -2.3499 | -5.2468 | 0.8016 | 2.8969 | -295.1426 | -322.5153 | -2.3906 | -2.6963 |
| 0.0651 | 1.66 | 1600 | 0.3962 | -2.0597 | -4.8915 | 0.8016 | 2.8318 | -291.5901 | -319.6136 | -2.3390 | -2.6469 |
| 0.0738 | 1.77 | 1700 | 0.3942 | -1.8893 | -4.6107 | 0.8135 | 2.7214 | -288.7817 | -317.9099 | -2.3532 | -2.6607 |
| 0.0597 | 1.87 | 1800 | 0.3990 | -1.8774 | -4.7221 | 0.8175 | 2.8448 | -289.8961 | -317.7905 | -2.2728 | -2.5908 |
| 0.0686 | 1.97 | 1900 | 0.3924 | -1.8745 | -4.6807 | 0.8056 | 2.8062 | -289.4821 | -317.7617 | -2.2554 | -2.5658 |
| 0.0116 | 2.08 | 2000 | 0.4260 | -2.4687 | -5.7190 | 0.7937 | 3.2503 | -299.8647 | -323.7037 | -2.2297 | -2.5347 |
| 0.0114 | 2.18 | 2100 | 0.4519 | -2.8266 | -6.3706 | 0.7976 | 3.5440 | -306.3802 | -327.2823 | -2.2185 | -2.5219 |
| 0.0073 | 2.28 | 2200 | 0.4563 | -2.9422 | -6.5564 | 0.8016 | 3.6142 | -308.2384 | -328.4384 | -2.2103 | -2.5126 |
| 0.0094 | 2.39 | 2300 | 0.4636 | -3.3246 | -7.0542 | 0.8016 | 3.7296 | -313.2165 | -332.2628 | -2.2059 | -2.5081 |
| 0.0056 | 2.49 | 2400 | 0.4745 | -3.3599 | -7.1652 | 0.7976 | 3.8053 | -314.3266 | -332.6161 | -2.1945 | -2.4943 |
| 0.0052 | 2.6 | 2500 | 0.4812 | -3.4916 | -7.3391 | 0.7976 | 3.8475 | -316.0656 | -333.9322 | -2.1888 | -2.4881 |
| 0.0065 | 2.7 | 2600 | 0.4678 | -3.2226 | -6.9887 | 0.7976 | 3.7661 | -312.5613 | -331.2425 | -2.1644 | -2.4560 |
| 0.0059 | 2.8 | 2700 | 0.4694 | -3.4307 | -7.2484 | 0.7976 | 3.8177 | -315.1584 | -333.3234 | -2.1572 | -2.4483 |
| 0.0054 | 2.91 | 2800 | 0.4707 | -3.4959 | -7.3283 | 0.8056 | 3.8324 | -315.9576 | -333.9758 | -2.1575 | -2.4491 |
### Framework versions
- Transformers 4.35.0
- Pytorch 2.1.1+cu121
- Datasets 2.14.6
- Tokenizers 0.14.1
### Evaluation during Training
- Loss: 0.4730
- Rewards/chosen: -3.5289
- Rewards/rejected: -7.3700
- Rewards/accuracies: 0.8016
- Rewards/margins: 3.8412
- Logps/rejected: -316.3751
- Logps/chosen: -334.3053
- Logits/rejected: -2.1644
- Logits/chosen: -2.4556 |