Code Review Assistant Model

A specialized Python code review assistant fine-tuned for security analysis, performance optimization, and Pythonic code quality. The model identifies security vulnerabilities, performance issues, and provides corrected code examples with detailed explanations specifically for Python codebases.

Model Details

Model Description

This model is a fine-tuned version of Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct, specifically optimized for Python code analysis. It excels at detecting security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and code quality issues while providing actionable fixes with corrected code examples.

  • Developed by: Alen Philip
  • Model type: Causal Language Model
  • Language(s) (NLP): English, with specialized Python code understanding
  • License: cc-by-nc-4.0
  • Finetuned from model: Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
  • Supported Languages: Python only

Model Sources

Uses

Direct Use

This model is specifically designed for:

  • Automated Python code review in development pipelines
  • Security vulnerability detection in Python code
  • Python code quality assessment and improvement suggestions
  • Performance optimization recommendations for Python applications
  • Educational purposes for learning Python best practices
  • Integration into Python IDEs and code editors

Downstream Use

The model can be integrated into:

  • CI/CD pipelines for automated Python code review
  • Python code quality monitoring tools
  • Security scanning platforms for Python applications
  • Educational platforms for Python programming
  • Code review assistance tools for Python developers

Out-of-Scope Use

  • Analysis of non-Python programming languages
  • Non-code related text generation
  • Legal or compliance advice
  • Production deployment without human validation
  • Real-time security monitoring without additional safeguards

Bias, Risks, and Limitations

  • Language Specificity: Only trained on Python code - will not perform well on other programming languages
  • False Positives/Negatives: May occasionally miss edge cases or flag non-issues
  • Training Data Bias: Reflects patterns and conventions present in the training dataset
  • Security Critical Systems: Should not be sole security measure for critical systems

Recommendations

Users should:

  • Always validate model suggestions with human review
  • Use as assistant tool rather than autonomous system
  • Test suggested fixes thoroughly before deployment
  • Combine with other security scanning tools for critical applications

How to Get Started with the Model

from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForCausalLM
import torch

model_name = "alenphilip/Code_Review_Assistant_Model"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name, trust_remote_code=True)
model = AutoModelForCausalLM.from_pretrained(
    model_name,
    torch_dtype=torch.bfloat16,
    device_map="auto",
    trust_remote_code=True
)

# Example usage for code review
def review_python_code(code_snippet):
    messages = [
        {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful AI assistant specialized in code review and security analysis."},
        {"role": "user", "content": f"Review this Python code and provide improvements with fixed code:\n\n```python\n{code_snippet}\n```"}
    ]
    
    text = tokenizer.apply_chat_template(
        messages,
        tokenize=False,
        add_generation_prompt=False
    )
    
    inputs = tokenizer(text, return_tensors="pt").to(model.device)
    outputs = model.generate(**inputs, max_new_tokens=512, temperature=0.1)
    response = tokenizer.decode(outputs[0], skip_special_tokens=True)
    
    return response

# Test with vulnerable code
vulnerable_code = '''
def get_user_by_email(email):
    query = "SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = '" + email + "'"
    cursor.execute(query)
    return cursor.fetchone()
'''

result = review_python_code(vulnerable_code)
print(result)

OR

# Use a pipeline as a high-level helper
from transformers import pipeline
pipe = pipeline("text-generation", model="alenphilip/Code_Review_Assistant_Model")
prompt = "Review this Python code and provide improvements with fixed code:\n\n```python\nclass LockManager:\n    def __init__(self, lock1, lock2):\n        self.lock1 = lock1\n        self.lock2 = lock2\n\n    def acquire_both(self):\n        self.lock1.acquire()\n        self.lock2.acquire() # This might fail\n\n    def release_both(self):\n        self.lock1.release()\n        self.lock2.release()\n```"
messages = [
    {"role": "system", "content": "You are a helpful AI assistant specialized in code review and security analysis."},
    {"role": "user", "content": prompt},
]
result = pipe(messages)
conversation = result[0]['generated_text']

for message in conversation:
    print(f"\n{message['role'].upper()}:")
    print("-" * 50)
    print(message['content'])
    print()

print("=" * 70)

Training Details

Training Data

The model was trained on a comprehensive dataset of Python code review examples covering:

🔐 SECURITY

  • SQL Injection Prevention
  • XSS Prevention in Web Frameworks
  • Authentication Bypass Vulnerabilities
  • Insecure Deserialization
  • Command Injection Prevention
  • JWT Token Security
  • Hardcoded Secrets Detection
  • Input Validation & Sanitization
  • Secure File Upload Handling
  • Broken Access Control
  • Password Hashing & Storage

⚡ PERFORMANCE

  • Algorithm Complexity Optimization
  • Database Query Optimization
  • Memory Leak Detection
  • I/O Bound Operations Optimization
  • CPU Bound Operations Optimization
  • Async/Await Performance
  • Caching Strategies Implementation
  • Loop Optimization Techniques
  • Data Structure Selection
  • Concurrent Execution Patterns

🐍 PYTHONIC CODE

  • Type Hinting Implementation
  • Mutable Default Arguments
  • Context Manager Usage
  • Decorator Best Practices
  • List/Dict/Set Comprehensions
  • Class Design Principles
  • Dunder Method Implementation
  • Property Decorator Usage
  • Generator Expressions
  • Class vs Static Methods
  • Import Organization
  • Exception Handling & Hierarchy
  • EAFP vs LBYL Patterns
  • Basic syntax validation
  • Variable scope validation
  • Type Operation Compatibility

🔧 PRODUCTION RELIABILITY

  • Error Handling and Logging

Training Procedure

Visualize in Weights & Biases

Training Hyperparameters

  • Training regime: bf16 mixed precision with SFT & QLoRA
  • Base Model: Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct
  • LoRA Rank: 32
  • LoRA Alpha: 64
  • LoRA Dropout: 0.1
  • Learning Rate: 2e-4
  • Batch Size: 16 (with gradient accumulation 4)
  • Epochs: 2
  • Max Sequence Length: 2048 tokens
  • Optimizer: Paged AdamW 8-bit

Speeds, Sizes, Times

  • Base Model Size: 7B parameters
  • Adapter Size: ~45MB
  • Training Time: ~68 minutes for 400 steps
  • Training Examples: 13,670 training, 1,726 evaluation

Evaluation

Metrics

  • ROUGE-L: 0.754
  • BLEU: 61.99
  • Validation Loss: 0.595

Results

The model achieved strong performance on code review tasks, particularly excelling at:

  • Security vulnerability detection (SQL injection, XSS, etc.)
  • Pythonic code improvements
  • Performance optimization suggestions
  • Providing corrected code examples

Summary

The model demonstrates excellent capability in identifying and fixing common Python code issues, with particular strength in security vulnerability detection and code quality improvements.

Environmental Impact

Carbon emissions can be estimated using the Machine Learning Impact calculator presented in Lacoste et al. (2019).

  • Hardware Type: NVIDIA H100 80GB VRAM
  • Hours used: ~1.5 hours
  • Training Approach: QLoRA for efficient fine-tuning

Technical Specifications

Model Architecture and Objective

  • Architecture: Transformer-based causal language model
  • Objective: Supervised fine-tuning for code review tasks
  • Context Window: 32K tokens (base model)

Compute Infrastructure

Hardware

  • Training performed on GPU cluster with NVIDIA H100 80GB VRAM

Software

  • Transformers, PEFT, TRL, BitsAndBytes
  • QLoRA for parameter-efficient fine-tuning

Citation

@misc{alen_philip_george_2025,
  author       = {Alen Philip George},  
  title        = {Code_Review_Assistant_Model (Revision 233d438)},  
  year         = 2025,  
  url          = {https://huggingface.co/alenphilip/Code_Review_Assistant_Model},  
  doi          = {10.57967/hf/6836},  
  publisher    = {Hugging Face}  
}

Model Card Authors

Alen Philip George

Model Card Contact

Hugging Face: alenphilip
LinkedIn: alenphilipgeorge
Email: alenphilipgeorge@gmail.com

For questions about this model, please use the Hugging Face model repository discussions or contact via the above channels.

Downloads last month
114
Safetensors
Model size
8B params
Tensor type
BF16
·
Inference Providers NEW
This model isn't deployed by any Inference Provider. 🙋 Ask for provider support

Model tree for alenphilip/Code_Review_Assistant_Model

Base model

Qwen/Qwen2.5-7B
Finetuned
(2816)
this model

Datasets used to train alenphilip/Code_Review_Assistant_Model