File size: 3,849 Bytes
4da9b38 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 |
---
license: llama2
model-index:
- name: Phind-CodeLlama-34B-v1
results:
- task:
type: text-generation
dataset:
type: openai_humaneval
name: HumanEval
metrics:
- name: pass@1
type: pass@1
value: 69.5%
verified: false
tags:
- code llama
---
Quantization with [bitsandbytes](https://github.com/TimDettmers/bitsandbytes)
_8-bit / nf4 / bfloat16_
-_Mediocre_ 🥱
# **Phind-CodeLlama-34B-Python-v1**
We've fine-tuned CodeLlama-34B and CodeLlama-34B-Python on an internal Phind dataset that achieve 67.6% and 69.5% pass@1 on HumanEval, respectively. GPT-4 achieves 67%. We've applied OpenAI's decontamination methodology to our dataset to ensure result validity.
More details can be found on our [blog post](https://www.phind.com/blog/code-llama-beats-gpt4).
## Model Details
This model is fine-tuned from CodeLlama-34B-Python and achieves 69.5% pass@1 on HumanEval.
## Dataset Details
We fined-tuned on a proprietary dataset of ~80k high quality programming problems and solutions. This dataset consists of instruction-answer pairs instead of code completion examples, making it structurally different from HumanEval. The Phind models were trained for 2 epochs, for a total of ~160k examples shown. LoRA was not used -- both models are a native finetune. We used DeepSpeed ZeRO 3 and Flash Attention 2 to train these models in three hours on 32 A100-80GB GPUs. We used a sequence length of 4096 tokens.
## How to Get Started with the Model
Make sure to install Transformers from the main git branch:
```bash
pip install git+https://github.com/huggingface/transformers.git
```
## How to Prompt the Model
**Please note that this model is somewhat instruction-tuned, but not chat-tuned.**
Do not try to use the Llama chat markup with this model. Instead, simply tell it what you want and add "\n: " at the end of your task.
For example:
```
Write me a linked list implementation: \n
```
## How to reproduce HumanEval Results
To reproduce our results:
```python
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, LlamaForCausalLM
from human_eval.data import write_jsonl, read_problems
from tqdm import tqdm
# initialize the model
model_path = "Phind/Phind-CodeLlama-34B-v1"
model = LlamaForCausalLM.from_pretrained(model_path, device_map="auto")
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_path)
# HumanEval helper
def generate_one_completion(prompt: str):
tokenizer.pad_token = tokenizer.eos_token
inputs = tokenizer(prompt, return_tensors="pt", truncation=True, max_length=4096)
# Generate
generate_ids = model.generate(inputs.input_ids.to("cuda"), max_new_tokens=256, do_sample=True, top_p=0.75, top_k=40, temperature=0.1)
completion = tokenizer.batch_decode(generate_ids, skip_special_tokens=True, clean_up_tokenization_spaces=False)[0]
completion = completion.replace(prompt, "").split("\n\n\n")[0]
return completion
# perform HumanEval
problems = read_problems()
num_samples_per_task = 1
samples = [
dict(task_id=task_id, completion=generate_one_completion(problems[task_id]["prompt"]))
for task_id in tqdm(problems)
for _ in range(num_samples_per_task)
]
write_jsonl("samples.jsonl", samples)
# run `evaluate_functional_correctness samples.jsonl` in your HumanEval code sandbox
```
## Bias, Risks, and Limitations
<!-- This section is meant to convey both technical and sociotechnical limitations. -->
This model has undergone very limited testing. Additional safety testing should be performed before any real-world deployments.
## Training details
<!-- Total emissions (in grams of CO2eq) and additional considerations, such as electricity usage, go here. Edit the suggested text below accordingly -->
- **Hardware Type:** 32x A100-80GB
- **Hours used:** 90 GPU-hours
- **Cloud Provider:** AWS
- **Compute Region:** us-east-1 |