OALZ/1788/Q1/NER
- Postprocessing
- Training
- Published datasets (union, merged union) and models (
EVENT
,LOC
,MISC
,ORG
,PER
,TIME
)
A named entity recognition system (NER) was trained on text extracted from Oberdeutsche Allgemeine Litteraturueitung (OALZ) of the first quarter (January, Febuary, March) of 1788. The scans from which text was extracted can be found at Bayerische Staatsbibliothek using the extraction strategy of the KEDiff project, which can be found at cborgelt/KEDiff
.
Annotations
Each text passage was annotated in doccano by two or three annotators and their annotations were cleaned and merged into one dataset. For details on how this was done, see LelViLamp/kediff-doccano-postprocessing
. In total, the text consists of about 1.7m characters. The resulting annotation datasets were published on the Hugging Face Hub. There are two versions of the dataset
union-dataset
contains the texts split into chunks. This is how they were presented in the annotation application doccano and results from preprocessing step 5a.merged-union-dataset
does not retain this split. The text was merged into one long text and annotation indices were adapted in preprocessing step 5b.
Note that both these directories contain three equivalent datasets each:
- a Huggingface/Arrow dataset, *
- a CSV, * and
- a JSONL file.
* The former two should be used together with the provided text.csv
to catch the context of the annotation. The latter JSONL file contains the full text.
The following categories were included in the annotation process:
Tag | Label | Count | Total Length | Median Annotation Length | Mean Annotation Length | SD |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVENT |
Event | 294 | 6,090 | 18 | 20.71 | 13.24 |
LOC |
Location | 2,449 | 24,417 | 9 | 9.97 | 6.21 |
MISC |
Miscellaneous | 2,585 | 50,654 | 14 | 19.60 | 19.63 |
ORG |
Organisation | 2,479 | 34,693 | 11 | 13.99 | 9.33 |
PER |
Person | 7,055 | 64,710 | 7 | 9.17 | 9.35 |
TIME |
Dates & Time | 1,076 | 13,154 | 8 | 12.22 | 10.98 |
NER models
Based on the annotations above, six separate NER classifiers were trained, one for each label type. This was done in order to allow overlapping annotations. For example, in the passage "Dieses Projekt wurde an der Universität Salzburg durchgeführt", you would want to categorise "Universität Salzburg" as an organisation while also extracting "Salzburg" as a location. This would result in an annotation like this:
{
"id": "example-42",
"text": "Dieses Projekt wurde an der Universität Salzburg durchgeführt",
"label": [[28, 49, "ORG"], [40, 49, "LOC"]]
}
Example entry in CSV and Huggingface dataset
annotation_id | line_id | start | end | label | label_text | merged |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
$n$ | example-42 | 28 | 49 | ORG | Universität Salzburg | ??? |
$n+1$ | example-42 | 40 | 49 | LOC | Salzburg | ??? |
The columns mean:
annotation_id
was assigned internally by enumerating all annotations. This is not present in the JSONL formatline_id
is the fragment of the subdivided text, as shown in doccano. Calledid
in the JSONL dataset.start
index of the first character that is annotated. Included, starts with 0.end
index of the last character that is annotated. Excluded, maximum value islen(respectiveText)
.label
indicates what the passage indicated by $[start, end)$ was annotated as.label_text
contains the text that is annotated by $[start, end)$. This is not present in the JSONL dataset as it can be inferred there.merged
indicates whether this annotation is the result of overlapping annotations of the same label. In that case,annotation_id
contains the IDs of the individual annotations it was constructed of. This is not present in the JSONL dataset.
To achieve this overlap, each text passage must be run through all the classifiers individually and each classifier's results need to be combined. For details on how the training was done, see LelViLamp/kediff-ner-training
.
The dbmdz/bert-base-historic-multilingual-cased
tokeniser was used to create historical embeddings. Therefore, it is necessary to use that in order to use these NER models.
The models' performance measures are as follows:
Model | Selected Epoch | Checkpoint | Validation Loss | Precision | Recall | F1 | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVENT |
1 | 1393 |
.021957 | .665233 | .343066 | .351528 | .995700 |
LOC |
1 | 1393 |
.033602 | .829535 | .803648 | .814146 | .990999 |
MISC |
2 | 2786 |
.123994 | .739221 | .503677 | .571298 | 968697 |
ORG |
1 | 1393 |
.062769 | .744259 | .709738 | .726212 | .980288 |
PER |
2 | 2786 |
.059186 | .914037 | .849048 | .879070 | .983253 |
TIME |
1 | 1393 |
.016120 | .866866 | .724958 | .783099 | .994631 |
Acknowledgements
The data set and models were created in the project Kooperative Erschließung diffusen Wissens (KEDiff), funded by the State of Salzburg, Austria 🇦🇹, and carried out at Paris Lodron Universität Salzburg.
- Downloads last month
- 8