Things I'd like to share

#3977
by SertanDoom - opened
SertanDoom changed discussion status to closed
SertanDoom changed discussion status to open

You've inspired me.

craiyon_2022-6-25_1-3-13.png

craiyon_2022-6-25_1-7-18.png

craiyon_2022-6-25_1-12-50.png

Looks like it can also draw maps of imaginary places.

craiyon_2022-6-25_9-45-40.png

I'm wondering what other "Styles" can be added in. Also it's looking like this is easily a useful tool for creating visual aids for a D&D campaign.

stained glass duck.png

uniduck.png

redbook.png

bluebook.png

scroll of magic.png

And here's your apothecary, pharmacist, or alchemist store for your campaign.
craiyon_2022-6-26_20-8-21.png

Here's your weapon store, and it's great because you never know what weapons the AI is going to put on the rack!
craiyon_2022-6-26_20-12-50.png

Your smithy:
craiyon_2022-6-26_20-16-13.png

Is there an AI that can generate a description, too?

Very nice! Wish there was an A.I. that could generate a description and maybe an adventure.

Then all that's needed is an A.I. that can Dungeon Master. Trying to describe a monster like a "Beholder" without saying "D&D Beholder" seems to be generating new monsters that can populate a campaign.
craiyon_2022-6-26_20-25-14.png

craiyon_2022-6-26_19-30-9.png

craiyon_2022-6-26_20-15-6.png

Monster generator, just need to tweak it for aesthetics, although this could be a fun alternative layout.
craiyon_2022-6-27_0-25-31.png

A little more in the dnd direction
craiyon_2022-6-27_0-29-41.png

Awesome idea. It never occurred to me that actual math/ computer functions might be incorporated in some way. Hmm, maybe adding words like "aquatic", "avian", "arboreal" might generate creatures one might find in different environments. Looks like adding "(" and ")" might help.

I've also been wondering why some simple descriptions make some pretty cool things and others don't. Some of these almost seem good enough for collectable card games.

craiyon_2022-6-27_19-59-41.png

craiyon_2022-6-27_19-46-37.png

craiyon_2022-6-27_19-40-42.png

craiyon_2022-6-27_20-12-5.png

craiyon_2022-6-27_20-10-25.png

craiyon_2022-6-27_20-8-17.png

Tried modifying for humanoids. doesn't seem to like heads.
craiyon_2022-6-27_20-50-51.png

craiyon_2022-6-27_20-40-53.png

craiyon_2022-6-27_20-56-27.png

craiyon_2022-6-27_20-55-2.png

Wow, I would play this game. I tried several prompts to get multiple heads and this kind of works:
craiyon_2022-6-28_2-13-3.png
Also, thanks for the parenthesis idea. Let's try a cerberus gorilla:
craiyon_2022-6-28_2-27-33.png

Cerberus gorilla- See evil, sniff evil, and bite evil in one body!
Have discovered that a range can be specified (one to six) for example that placement of "(" ")" seems important but it will still occasionally go out of range.

craiyon_2022-6-28_18-56-2.png

craiyon_2022-6-28_19-10-48.png
For the most part looks like this can be used to limit effects to specific parts. Just the heads in this case as opposed to a completely flaming subject. Gotta say that the dungeons and dragons style is looking to be a winner. Also been thinking that the vocabulary might be limited as sometimes changing to a different word that means the same thing might be more likely to get the desired result. also seems to make assumptions- pumpkins have carved faces when placed on a man, wizards pretty much always have a staff. Other "styles" might be from other high net presence media.

craiyon_2022-6-28_19-25-42.png

I'm not convinced that's right:
craiyon_2022-6-28_23-35-1.png
So, I'm going to do an experiment:
craiyon_2022-6-28_23-43-21.png
craiyon_2022-6-28_23-46-23.png
Which means all the prepositions and conjunctions need to be tested, and other punctuation.

Ratios might be possible?
craiyon_2022-6-28_23-58-47.png

Except vs without vs explicit
craiyon_2022-6-29_0-2-1.png

craiyon_2022-6-29_0-3-16.png

craiyon_2022-6-29_0-6-17.png
Explicit, as in building from pieces, works much better than prepositions in this case.

interesting points. This does seem to resist some things. some things it does easy and others seem to succeed maybe one or two times out of the nine. Agreed on the testing.

craiyon_2022-6-28_21-47-26.png

Since it can do a flaming motorcycle but not with rider - could multi subjects per request be hitting some kind of limit where it decides what's most important?

stars.png

sometimes it seems to go out of range on repeated attempts with the stars. Basically attempted a simple dice roller (D6) but seems to occasionally roll off the table, across the floor, and out the door.

Interesting shopping cart, also interesting what it tried to put inside.

It generally sees eggs the same size:
craiyon_2022-6-29_2-14-4.png
More than 6 despite limit:
craiyon_2022-6-29_2-20-59.png
Very close to dark mode die:
craiyon_2022-6-29_2-24-8.png
Got it:
craiyon_2022-6-29_2-26-28.png

Found something:

craiyon_2022-6-29_2-39-40.png

It looks like it's not really a limit, but how it responds; it wants the result to have symmetry? Refer to my rainbow without orange example.

Testing cartons of eggs. I think I found the hiccup:
craiyon_2022-6-29_7-51-55.png
And a completely different result with a simple quantity change:
craiyon_2022-6-29_7-48-23.png
Word change slightly better results:
craiyon_2022-6-29_8-3-5.png
And yet again more reasons to not use the plural:
craiyon_2022-6-29_8-7-47.png

Just waking up -Eggs and toast yum!
The spotlight "6" does stand out as odd. Not awake enough to form the right sentences here yet.
poker chips on a square grid look like the chips are arranged to form a grid in the instances where there are more than one.

Is this a better problem to have? No longer getting a bias of a single egg, and also not getting a dozen.
craiyon_2022-6-29_8-45-58.png

And now I know, there's such a thing as being served grid toast:
craiyon_2022-6-29_8-52-36.png
Dalle, did I ask for eggs? No tip for you:
craiyon_2022-6-29_8-58-45.png
Found the problem! It treats (all?) definite quantities as indefinites:
craiyon_2022-6-29_9-3-17.png
And if I prompt the singular, like "piece" or "slice" it gives a singular bias. If I prompt the plural I never get singular. That's why toast would be great if it didn't try to turn the occasional hole into the resemblance of the 6 shape. Trying goldfish instead now, how do we force it to always show 6?
craiyon_2022-6-29_9-13-47.png

Eggs, Toast, and grid-dle. lol yum. Now I'm hungry again. Nice catch on the "definite" quantities.
Craiyon understands the word "portrait".

barbarian portrait.png

wizard portrait.png

Elf portrait1.png

female elf high detail.png

elvan female lower detail.png
almost seems like adding the background detail cost detail quality.

It did. It also understands side profiles:
craiyon_2022-6-29_22-24-39.png

I kind of like the bottom row middle soldier profile.

craiyon_2022-6-29_20-11-30.png

Are the last ones "water color" style?

That was weird.

dallemini_2022-7-2_12-16-46.png
Nope
dallemini_2022-7-2_12-19-13.png
Maybe recursion would be best since it already accepts it? Hmm:
dallemini_2022-7-2_12-22-1.png

You can read it above them: (abstract style) sail

It's really interesting that it breaks: realistic giant square dark slate box in an ivory border with six tightly inset square marble boxes
dallemini_2022-7-2_12-27-38.png

It truly takes the entire prompt, as if it was playing with different cups of playdoh - you'll never get back what you started with.
dallemini_2022-7-2_12-30-55.png

Images sent appear outsized on my end with that information missing. I did try the watercolor style.
craiyon_092112_tallship__watercolor_style__br_.png
like the look.

Wondering if someone who studies languages might have a better time figuring out why craiyon does some things really well but might not comprehend some descriptions

Been trying the boxes within boxes- no real luck. Starting to look like that one bottom corner is pretty much the oddball that might get it when the others won't or it might get the weird result when the others do get it.

craiyon_151212__nbsp_circle_with__one_to_six_outlines__on_a_blue_background__br_.png

craiyon_151610__nbsp_square_with__three_to_six_outlines__on_a_blue_background__br_.png

It's the same shape hmm, thanks for reminding me it does fractals well:
dallemini_2022-7-2_23-23-34.png
Baffling:
dallemini_2022-7-2_23-27-21.png

I'm surprised it was able to get any features of paper money.
Found my Ghost ship.

craiyon_160307_high_definition_holographic_tallship_br_.png

reminds me of old black light posters

craiyon_161032_high_definition_holographic_fractal_star_br_.png

craiyon_161735_high_definition_holographic_fractal_fairy_br_.png

craiyon_161502_high_definition_holographic_fractal_fairy_br_.png

This fits a tattoo request I had:
dallemini_2022-7-3_21-54-52.png
Might be able to turn Matryoshka into an adjective if done correctly?
dallemini_2022-7-3_21-58-6.png
Or bento? Looks cool "giant square onyx bento cube with only six rice balls inside"
dallemini_2022-7-3_22-1-58.png
"giant square onyx bento cube with only six rice fish lunch"
dallemini_2022-7-3_22-5-5.png

Sign up or log in to comment