Spaces:
Runtime error
Thank you for this service but any advice to make a ckpt easy for automatic1111
Just trying to get this figured out with automatic 1111 to use the model also I did get charged 2 extra models that's weritd possible a mistake I just know now to be careful in future please let me know if you need anything.
Did a basic train on a person large 768 model thank you
Thank you for using this service.
2 extra models are just different parameters for the same model. They are part of the package. You should not be charged extra for them. But if you believe you have been, please send an email to autotrain [at] hf.co and we can take a look.
re ckpt: will add it soon!
First off, I prefer to express my gratitude for this service. It's great to have a platform the place we can come together and exchange ideas.
Now, onto the topic at hand. Making a checkpoint (ckpt) easy for automatic processing can be a bit challenging, but fear not! I have some advice that might help.
Firstly, it's crucial to ensure that the naming convention for your ckpt file is clear and standardized. This will make it easier for any automated systems to identify and work with the file. Try to use meaningful names that reflect the content or purpose of the checkpoint.
Additionally, consider providing a well-documented README file alongside the ckpt. This document should include instructions on how to use and interpret the checkpoint, as well as any dependencies or prerequisites. Clear documentation will streamline the automatic processing of the ckpt.
Lastly, if you can, provide a metadata file that contains relevant information about the ckpt. This could include details such as the version, creation date, or any important updates. This metadata can assist automated systems in accurately handling and analyzing the checkpoint.
I hope these suggestions help make your ckpt easy for automatic processing. If anyone else has more insights, feel free to click and share your thoughts!
First off, I prefer to express my gratitude for this service. It's great to have a platform the place we can come together and exchange ideas.
Now, onto the topic at hand. Making a checkpoint (ckpt) easy for automatic processing can be a bit challenging, but fear not! I have some advice that might help.
Firstly, it's crucial to ensure that the naming convention for your ckpt file is clear and standardized. This will make it easier for any automated systems to identify and work with the file. Try to use meaningful names that reflect the content or purpose of the checkpoint.
Additionally, consider providing a well-documented README file alongside the ckpt. This document should include instructions on how to use and interpret the checkpoint, as well as any dependencies or prerequisites. Clear documentation will streamline the automatic processing of the ckpt.
Lastly, if you can, provide a metadata file that contains relevant information about the ckpt. This could include details such as the version, creation date, or any important updates. This metadata can assist automated systems in accurately handling and analyzing the checkpoint.
I hope these suggestions help make your ckpt easy for automatic processing. If anyone else has more insights, feel free to click and share your thoughts!
hm..
ok