output.csv

transcriptions,labels,summary,sentiment
"I can record. And we don't have a ton of items to get to. And I might be able to do one that might be fun, if we have a little bit of time. So corporate events, I think I saw a little. I put this in Slack, and I saw a little bit of noise around it,",I can record.," I can record. And we don't have a ton of items to get to. And I might be able to do one that might be fun, if we have a little bit of time . So corporate events, I think I saw a little. I put this in Slack, and I saw . I put a little . bit of noise around it, he says .",NEGATIVE
"and et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. I don't see anyone in the, maybe there are comments in the issue. I don't see the header updated yet. I thought we had in Slack sort of farmed each one of them out. So I guess the next, so it looks like Ty put in some folks. It looks like this looks good.","et cetera, e"," I don't see anyone in the, maybe there are comments in the issue . I thought we had in Slack sort of farmed each one of them out . So I guess the next, so it looks like Ty put in some folks. and et cetera, et ceta, etc. and etc. It looks like this looks good. It's not clear what happened to the header .",NEGATIVE
"Yeah, same not in, not in real time, but it source feedback. I got one person to respond so far. So it may end up Cindy being you and I just pick the one that we want to do, and then they can back us up. If we don't get any more feedback.",Cindy and I got one person to respond so," It may end up Cindy being you and I just pick the one that we want to do, and then they can back us up . If we don't get any more feedback, it may be Cindy and Cindy picking the one they want, Cindy will be Cindy . If they don't like it, Cindy can back them up if she doesn't like the one she wants to do .",NEGATIVE
"Yep. Yep. That's where we were last I heard. Cool. So then I think, I think we can we can help the corporate events team they do they do a lot of like cat herding and, you know, keep on tracking people down. So I think if, if this team can take the mission to, like, try to help track that down so if you, you know, get the commitment",Yep.," I think, I think we can we can help the corporate events team they do they do a lot of like cat herding and, you know, keep on tracking people down . So I think if, if this team can take the mission to, like, try to try to ... try to help track that down . Yep. Yep. That's where we were last I heard. Cool.",NEGATIVE
"But I had two questions about that one. One is, over what time frame are we looking at? So in theory, this could be the same as the GitLab 14 launch, where we're saying, basically, since 13.0, what kind of big improvements have we made? Candidly, this is always a little bit tough.",GitLab 14 Launches —," GitLab 14 launch could be the same as GitLab's 13.0 launch, where we're saying what kind of big improvements have we made? Candidly, this is always a little bit tough. But I had two questions about that one: What kind of time frame are we looking at? So in theory, this could be a similar launch, but it's not the same thing .",NEGATIVE
"At GitLab, it's really, really tough to make product announcements because our entire roadmap is completely public. Yada, yada, yada. So the thought here is to, but also because our entire roadmap is completely public and because we ship these tiny little MVCs, a new feature will come out, but it'll be not really usable. Right? So it takes a while.",GitLab's entire roadmap is completely," GitLab's entire roadmap is completely public, so it takes a while to make product announcements . GitLab says it's really, really tough to announce product announcements because our roadmap is public . The GitLab team says they ship tiny little MVCs, a new feature will come out, but it'll be not really usable. So the thought here is to, but also because of our entire roadmap, is to be public .",NEGATIVE
"if you look at over the course of the year, we went from this to this, it makes more sense to me to highlight that than in any individual little thing. And then the other point was, we just had 14.0, can we reuse some of those things and plug them in here? Absolutely, yeah. Yeah, and vulnerability management was one of the, you know, the features out of, we looked at 14.0.",14.0 is a vulnerability management feature," If you look at over the course of the year, we went from this to this, it makes more sense to me to highlight that than in any individual little thing . And then the other point was, we just had 14.0, can we reuse some of those things and plug them in here? Absolutely, yeah. Yeah. Yeah, and vulnerability management was one of the features out of, you know, the features .",NEGATIVE
"And integrations, we don't, well, actually, we have some pretty exciting integrations. So we have, you know. The JIRA stuff is pretty good. There's a couple of things in integrations with VS code that could be notable, but can I show what I did for SCM just to get some general feedback on it? And if someone hasn't done it, maybe that'll also kick. I was going Cindy's direction here,",What I did for SCM with JIRA," There's a couple of things in integrations with VS code that could be notable, but can I show what I did for SCM just to get some general feedback on it? And if someone hasn't done it, maybe that'll also kick. And integrations, we don't, well, actually, we have some pretty exciting integrations. So we have, you know. The JIRA stuff is pretty good .",POSITIVE
"Actually, that's super typical, right? Like Windows 11 or anybody who's rolling stuff out, they almost always have UX as one of their three things. And then they mentioned a laundry list of stuff that aligns to that. So I forgave myself for doing something at first. I was kind of like shy about calling out UX and bucketing some things there. But actually when I looked around, that's pretty much how everybody does a big launch. And in terms of the excitement level, that also like I went in thinking, this is just a two.",YES!," ""I was kind of like shy about calling out UX and bucketing some things there. But actually when I looked around, that's pretty much how everybody does a big launch,"" he says . Like Windows 11 or anybody who's rolling stuff out, they almost always have UX as one of their three things. And then they mentioned a laundry list of stuff that aligns to that. So I forgave myself for doing something .",NEGATIVE
"about that. I like that. I've done a similar, I've taken a similar approach for monitor with incident management. There were a bunch of things that we released, although the core of incident management was part of 12.x I think. So I did the same over there as well.",The monitoring of incident management.," There were a bunch of things that we released, although the core of incident management was part of 12.x I think . So I did the same over there as well. about that. I've done a similar, I've taken a similar approach for monitor with incident management. I like that. But I'm not sure if it's the same thing I did with monitor .",POSITIVE
"and up level it. So that would be helpful there. And also Brian about the VS code thing. One other cool thing about that is both of those VS code integrations that hit the same month were community contributions, which is also kind of cool. Is that, do we have VS code listed on here? I didn't add it, but I can add that in. I've got good notes on that.",VS Code Integrations," Both of those VS code integrations that hit the same month were community contributions, which is also kind of cool . Is that, do we have VS code listed on here? I didn't add it, but I can add that in. and up level it. So that would be helpful there. and also Brian about the VS code thing. I've got good notes on that.",POSITIVE
"So I think that's a good one too. How are we measuring excitement levels, 1, 2, and 3? Is there? I was looking at maybe MAU as a metric to perhaps measure whether customers have started using that, are interested in using that or not. We probably may not have it for everything, but at least some of it, wherever we have it,",Is MAU a metric?," How are we measuring excitement levels, 1, 2, and 3? Is there? I was looking at maybe MAU as a metric to perhaps measure whether customers have started using that, are interested in using that or not . We probably may not have it for everything, but at least some of it, wherever we have it, it's a good one too .",NEGATIVE
"upvotes or when there's a lot of demand for it, then I would bump the excitement level on something like that. Certainly, if something's shipped and a lot of people are using it, the MAU, that's another good measure. I don't know that any one of those needs to be exclusive. I think it's a bit of an individual judgment call on just like, what is your feeling based on, you know, could be anecdotal, like you talk to customers and they're really hyper excited about this.",The MAU: Getting excited about the," I think it's a bit of an individual judgment call on just like, what is your feeling based on, you know, could be anecdotal, like you talk to customers and they're really hyper excited about this . Certainly, if something's shipped and a lot of people are using it, the MAU, that's another good measure . I don't know that any one of those needs to be exclusive .",NEGATIVE
"especially in the case we have slim pickings. Alternatively, if there are double-digit entries, then we can stack rank. So that's kind of also helpful there. So if we have three for all of these, that, I mean, it looks like we're going to get there. And that's going to be quite a lot of features. So I might constrain it like this.",A lot of features and features for a," If we have three for all of these, that, it looks like we're going to get there. And that's going to be quite a lot of features. especially in the case we have slim pickings. Alternatively, if there are double-digit entries, then we can stack rank. So that's kind of also helpful there. So I might constrain it like this.",POSITIVE
"But that could be on the list. I could give you 10 things instead of three. Give this just the rough pass. And a lot of things recently I've been moving between docs and spreadsheet and the spreadsheet to docs. This might end up, or some iteration of this might end up in a spreadsheet where we then try to stack rank in PR. It's like, OK, out of all of the maybe 10 boxes here",10 Things I Could Give You," A lot of things recently I've been moving between docs and spreadsheet and the spreadsheet to docs. This might end up in a spreadsheet where we then try to stack rank in PR. But that could be on the list. I could give you 10 things instead of three. Give this just the rough pass. It's like, OK, out of all of the maybe 10 boxes here .",NEGATIVE
"keynote as well, that there's some level of like an announcement that we make that then the press cares about that announcement. Again, really tough to do at GitLab because it's all been around for a while. So this is, this is our attempt to head to that area is to say like these are the announcements of the event.",GitLab's announcements," GitLab is trying to make an attempt to make newsworthy announcements that the press cares about that announcement . GitLab has been around GitLab for more than a decade, but it's been around for a long time . This is GitLab's attempt to head to that area is to say like these are the announcements of the event. keynote as well, that there's some level of like an announcement that we make that . then the press . that then, that's what GitLab does, that it's all been around .",NEGATIVE
"So maybe we can do like five minutes kind of like just time box and kind of look at these here. What do you all think is a top would be a top five out of the list of, you know, 20 or 30.",5 Minutes of Time Boxes," What do you all think is a top would be a top five out of the list of, you know, 20 or 30? So maybe we can do like five minutes kind of like just time box and kind of look at these here . What do we all think of a top? Top five would be the top five of this list of 20- or 30 .",POSITIVE
of the proprietary scanning without making it sound like they're scanning improvements because that sounds like they weren't good before. Yeah. Let's go with vulnerability management for now. I would agree on that one. And I would say that some of these we did do some press around and the fuzzing acquisitions was one thing.,a fuzzing acquisition of proprietary scanning, Some of these we did do some press around and the fuzzing acquisitions was one thing . But some of these acquisitions were one thing. of the proprietary scanning without making it sound like they're scanning improvements because that sounds like they weren't good before. Yeah. Let's go with vulnerability management for now. I would agree on that one. And I would say that some of the .,NEGATIVE
"The PR team liked all the, I mean, we got a lot of attention on the acquisition, so they had me do a follow-up on the integration. I just feel like it's kind of worn out now, but. Right. That's what I was saying is that the fuzzing we already did press on probably will not get another chomp at that. So I think let's go with vulnerability management. Unreviewed is the new position. In terms of proprietary stuff, we've also got,",Unreviewed is a new position.," The PR team liked all the, I mean, we got a lot of attention on the acquisition, so they had me do a follow-up on the integration . I just feel like it's kind of worn out now, but. That's what I was saying is that the fuzzing we already did press on probably will not get another chomp at that . So I think let's go with vulnerability management. Unreviewed is the new position.",NEGATIVE
"item and a couple of the pieces about get back 14. Which between between the, the proprietary ships and the vulnerability management which would you pick as the number one out of those two probably vulnerability management. Okay.",The key to the vulnerability management," The proprietary ships and the vulnerability management which would you pick as the number one out of those two probably vulnerability management. item . item and a couple of the pieces about get back 14. item are about get-back 14 . item . Item and two pieces about the, the proprietary ships. item and the . vulnerability management item. Item and a few of the . piece about the . proprietary ships . Item .",POSITIVE
"plus she or integrations. It's like a bucket of capabilities that is probably worth talking about. Cool, well, let's try to, this is due Tuesday, I think. We wanna try to get this done.",Plus she or integrations.," ""It's like a bucket of capabilities that is probably worth talking about,"" he says . ""We wanna try to get this done. It's like ... it's due Tuesday, I think,"" he adds. ""We want to get it done. Plus she or she or integrations. plus she or integrate it"" he says. Cool, well, let's try to, he adds .",POSITIVE
"But yeah, there might be. Cool, I'm just gonna, I'm gonna ping you on this Cormac to add a top five plan. Cool. I think. Man, it's a pretty heavy list, just looking at it, you know, it's pretty cool. Yeah, that's good.",Cormac Top 5 Plan," I think it's a pretty heavy list, just looking at it, you know, it's pretty cool . But yeah, there might be. Cool, I'm just gonna ping you on this Cormac to add a top five plan . I think. I think there might even be a plan for Cormac, Cormac . Cormac: ""There might be.""",POSITIVE
"they'd have this big stack of like carpet, they were like squares of carpet. And you go into the gym and you'd pull off this square of carpet and all the children would sit on a square of carpet. And that was like, you'd have an assembly. Yeah. So that's what I remember. I remember that too. Put everyone in the gym or like convert the half cafeteria gym, you know, take away the big barrier between it so that we can have more room and then take those carpets that have never been cleaned and just, you know,",What I've learned from a gym," They'd have this big stack of like carpet, they were like squares of carpet . And you go into the gym and you'd pull off this square of carpet and all the children would sit on a square . And that was like, you'd have an assembly. Yeah. I remember that too. Put everyone in the gym or like convert the half cafeteria gym, you know, take away the big barrier .",NEGATIVE
"Yes. So in the competitive sheet, I was, I mean, I've already identified the features for CD, configure, as well as monitor, getting it reviewed from PM. My guess was, or my understanding was that we wouldn't have the same set of competitors that we're going to compare to, but the right competitors for that particular stage.",I've already identified the features for CD," In the competitive sheet, I was, I mean, I've already identified the features for CD, configure, as well as monitor, getting it reviewed from PM . My guess was, or my understanding was that we wouldn't have the same set of competitors that we're going to compare to, but the right competitors for that particular stage . Yes. I mean .",NEGATIVE
"they may not be relevant. For example, cloud beats may not be relevant for monitor stage at all. So that's what I wanted to check with you. Yeah, that's the case. I need to go back and look at the spreadsheet. I mean, if the competitor does not apply to that particular stage, they shouldn't be on that tab in the spreadsheet. So are you saying that you see competitors on that tab for a stage where they don't apply? Yeah, I think it was copy pasted. Each rule has the same.",How do you see competitors on that tab?," I need to go back and look at the spreadsheet. I mean, if the competitor does not apply to that particular stage, they shouldn't be on that tab in the spreadsheet . For example, cloud beats may not be relevant for monitor stage at all. they may not even be relevant. So that's what I wanted to check with you. Yeah, that's the case. It was copy pasted.",NEGATIVE
"So we're just focusing on tier one right now. So if they don't apply to that stage, don't worry about it. Make sense? So just pick the ones out of that list that apply to our stage. Right. So we just use the tier one competitors and if they're not, if they don't, are not applicable then we don't have to fill out anything for that. Yeah, for now, but then we'll move to tier two and tier three, then we'll look at those other competitors.",tier one competitors aren't applicable," So we're just focusing on tier one right now, but then we'll move to tier two and tier three . So if they don't apply to that stage, don't worry about it. So just pick the ones out of that list that apply to our stage. So we just use the tier one competitors and if they're not, if they are not, are not applicable then we don't have to fill out anything for that .",NEGATIVE
"Some of those were like GitLab only. Some of those were like GitLab didn't have. Well, I thought it was supposed to be, none of them should be GitLab only. Right. It should be all through the lens of, yeah, yeah, exactly. Yeah. It should be like market lens. So in an ideal world, most of them are like, this is what I'm shopping for this solution. Some, like some of them might be GitLab only some of them like competitor only, so that it's a, somebody would look at it and be like,",Trying to find a way to sell," None of them should be GitLab only, he says . ""It should be all through the lens of ... market lens,"" he adds . ""In an ideal world, most of them are like, this is what I'm shopping for this solution. Some of those were like GitLab didn't have. Some, like some of them might be . competitor only, so that it's a . somebody would look at it and be like, somebody would . look at the . somebody's like, yeah, yeah .",NEGATIVE
"Same with Azure DevOps, same with JFrog. Well, they all do for tier one except Jenkins and CloudBees. Yeah, Jenkins CloudBees does not. But what is it? Azure DevOps, GitHub, Atlassian. And although Atlassian, we still need to figure something out there. As a matter of fact, did I go back and add Atlassian? Because based on conversation, I think we have to do it. I don't think we can leave them off. I don't know if they'll look at this question.",Why is Atlassian in the future?," Jenkins and CloudBees do not have the ability to work with Microsoft's DevOps toolkit . Azure DevOps, GitHub, Atlassian, GitHub and JFrog all do for tier one except Jenkins . Jenkins: ""I don't think we can't leave them off. I don't know if they'll look at this question. I think we have to do it""",NEGATIVE
"It'd be, I think if we took that a step further, it'd be good to even describe it in a way that doesn't just say our product stage and use like a value-based description of what monitor and configure mean, because otherwise we're just, no, that's not going to do any good for us. Have you guys seen the new infographic that the design team has come up with? Not yet. Oh, you haven't? No. Do we have a link to that quickly, William? I don't know.",Is it a good idea to describe," It'd be, I think if we took that a step further, it'd be good to even describe it in a way that doesn't just say our product stage and use like a value-based description of what monitor and configure mean, because otherwise we're just, no, that's not going to do any good for us . Have you guys seen the new infographic that the design team has come up with? Not yet .",NEGATIVE
"Who can look at first? I found it. I found it. Oh, so this is the one. So this there's two. This is the one for the single tool comparison, but then for the, but it's going to look the same, but then here's the one for, I just put it in chat for you guys. And here's the one for the",Who can look at first?," This is the one for the single tool comparison, but then for the, but it's going to look the same, but I just put it in chat for you guys . Who can look at first? I found it. Oh, so this there's two. This there's the one . And here's the . one for, just put the one in chat .",NEGATIVE
"and sort of towards some progress. So I concur that maybe configure and monitor is not as descriptive as it could be, but the place where it will, so actually I'll share one thing. It just seems like the right time to do this, right? Manage is even less descriptive than that. So the way this is getting built is off of a data model.",Configure and monitor is not as descriptive as," It just seems like the right time to do this, right? Manage is even less descriptive than that. So I concur that maybe configure and monitor is not as descriptive as it could be, but the place where it will, so actually I'll share one thing. So the way this is getting built is off of a data model. and sort of towards some progress .",NEGATIVE
"of the 15 features. And that's where you can describe what the heck a verify is. What the heck I manage. Okay, so we will have an opportunity because I was about to say you're gonna hate me for this but like we're being cyclical about the same problem we had, which being the audience coming in and not knowing anything about these specific stages. Yeah.",What the heck a verify is.," I was about to say you're gonna hate me for this but like we're being cyclical about the same problem we had, which being the audience coming in and not knowing anything about these specific stages . And that's where you can describe what the heck a verify is. What the heck I manage. of the 15 features. Yeah. Okay, so we will have an opportunity .",NEGATIVE
"That's what I was going for. You like that? OK. It's not obviously negative. So we're saying, because it really does lend itself to being a comparison more than a competitive piece because of that. Because there's no, these folks at 37% are in the red and they're terrible. They just have less green, or we would have less green. So it's not being worse, it's being less good. And I think that lends itself to working with all the",That's what I was going for.," It really does lend itself to being a comparison more than a competitive piece because of that . Because there's no, these folks at 37% are in the red and they're terrible, it's being less good . So it's not being worse. It's not obviously negative. OK. That's what I was going for. You like that? OK. So we're saying .",POSITIVE
"But I brought it up for now we're going to stick with the green. They recommend it, we stick with the green and see how it goes. But I don't know, I was feeling the red and yellow too. It is easy on the eyes. There's something to be said for that. Cool. Well, we're almost up on time, but I did want to share one thing that kind of came in",The Green and the Yellow," It is easy on the eyes. There's something to be said for that. But I don't know, I was feeling the red and yellow too too too . But I brought it up for now we're going to stick with the green. They recommend it, we stick with it and see how it goes. It's not easy, it's just easy .",POSITIVE
"vision, we are transparent and a single source of truth, countless possibilities. Honestly, I think this one's really like really pithy and catchy. Uh, I really like it. Um, I really liked, uh, what's the other one that I like that not everyone does. Um, all in one for everyone. So I just, uh, I don't know. I like, I just think, so there's something catchy about that. Um, but I know that kind of catchy is not everyone's cup of tea.","Vision, we are transparent and a single"," ""We are transparent and a single source of truth, countless possibilities"" ""I think this one's really like really pithy and catchy,"" she says . ""I know that kind of catchy is not everyone's cup of tea. Um, I really liked, uh, what's the other one that I like that not everyone does,"" she adds . ""All in one for everyone. So there's something catchy about that.""",POSITIVE
"slide and the next one that doesn't have anything under security. This was the, honestly, so when I first got this, it didn't have this, and it didn't have anything under security. So this was like... What I do is just your iteration of it. Yeah, this is mine. This is, I just put here so that I would have like the original statements. Got it. Like, you know,",Slide and the next one that doesn't," This was the, honestly, so when I first got this, it didn't have this, and the next one that doesn't have anything under security. So this was like... What I do is just your iteration of it. Yeah, this is mine. This is, I just put here so that I would have like the original statements. Like, you know, got it. Got it.",NEGATIVE
"and then actually let's start here. This one I couldn't pick. And I'll tell you why it's because I like things to have parody in their tone, right? So this is maybe like super nuanced elements of messaging, but I hate it if it's like a single source of truth that's like in noun phrase, and then control that's like a noun item. So you could say with GitLab, you get a single source of truth,",GitLab: a single source of," This is maybe like super nuanced elements of messaging, but I hate it if it's like a single source of truth that's like in noun phrase, and then control that's a noun item . So you could say with GitLab, you get a single Source of truth, You could say . GitLab. and then actually let's start here. This one I couldn't pick because I like things to have parody in their tone, right?",NEGATIVE
"Well, I guess less risk also implies higher quality. I guess that kind of bundles the quality and the security together. So I've talked myself out of not liking that. So yeah, good. Cindy's last blog post had a really good turn of phrase that I stole for GiveApp14 when she was out. It was like, secure the software factory and all the stuff that you're making. She said it really elegantly. And its deliverables. Secure the software factory and its deliverables.",GiveApp14: What is better than Give," Well, I guess less risk also implies higher quality . I guess that kind of bundles the quality and the security together . So I've talked myself out of not liking that . So yeah, good. Well, it's good. So yeah . Secure the software factory and all the stuff that you're making. And its deliverables. Secure it and its deliverable.",POSITIVE
"or your software and your product. Product sounds like car manufacturer. You can say IP here, but it just doesn't sound right. And that's always, it's always shorthand. Yeah. I like this one better. Yeah, I think I do too. But I appreciate the thought, Brian. And then the last thing I'll say is,",Your software and your product.," Product sounds like car manufacturer. You can say IP here, but it just doesn't sound right . And that's always, it's always shorthand shorthand. or your software and your product. Yeah, I like this one better. But I appreciate the thought, Brian. Yeah. I think I do too. I like it better. I appreciate it, Brian .",POSITIVE
"is what you get. I like your move fast with confidence better than increase speed and stay on track. Yeah, so I was trying to, I was thinking of like, you know, if you're like, if you're in a race car and like you go like super, super fast, you're like, let's say you're in the bike race, right? And you're going so fast and somebody holds out the sign and then like half of the bike race collapses. If you, right? So it's almost kind of like, you can,",I like your move fast with confidence better than," I like your move fast with confidence better than increase speed and stay on track . I was thinking of like, you know, if you're in a race car and like you go like super, super fast, you're like, let's say you're . And you're going so fast and somebody holds out the sign and then like half of the bike race collapses, right? So it's almost kind of like you can, you can .",NEGATIVE
"NASCAR goes fast and turns left because it get loud. So, you're our new Ricky Bobby. So yeah, so I don't think I like that one. And then I think between these two, I like move fast with confidence, but I don't like the verbiage of it because it doesn't have parity.",NASCAR goes fast and turns left because," NASCAR goes fast and turns left because it get loud because it gets loud, but I don't like the verbiage of it because it doesn't have parity, he says . So yeah, so he doesn't think I like that one. And then I think between these two, I like move fast with confidence, but ... I like moving fast and confident with confidence .",POSITIVE
"trade-offs. That's like saying like 100% secure, complete. This is why we always say mitigate, right? We always say mitigate risk, or less risk. You never say no. You have some leeway with messaging, right? I mean, not everything, you know. Just more speed, less risk with confidence. Yeah. More speed.",Trade-offs.," This is why we always say mitigate risk, or less risk. You never say no. Trade-offs. That's like saying like 100% secure, complete. You have some leeway with messaging, right? I mean, not everything, you know. Just more speed, less risk with confidence with confidence. Yeah Yeah. More speed. trade-offs .",NEGATIVE
"And then next week we'll watch Step Brothers. That's another great one. So much room for activities. Okay, I'm gonna go with more speed, less risk. And I think this is due at the end of the day. So any additional thoughts? I'm actually gonna untag. I mean, it's strong. All those are, you know, those are good. Awesome. Well, this was kind of fun to do a little bit",Step Brothers: Step Brothers," This was kind of fun to do a little bit. I mean, it's strong. All those are, you know, those are good. And then next week we'll watch Step Brothers. That's another great one. So much room for activities. I'm gonna go with more speed, less risk. And I think this is due at the end of the day. So any additional thoughts?",POSITIVE