Potential for misuse

#1
by scottinallcaps - opened
This comment has been hidden
Stable Diffusion concepts library org

.

Stable Diffusion concepts library org

😂

DSwissK changed discussion status to closed
Stable Diffusion concepts library org

Lmao I've got an even better hack for misuse of a rapid covid test - color it in with a sharpie

Stable Diffusion concepts library org

What is this?

Stable Diffusion concepts library org

btw it doesn't work that well,

image.png

It was super late and I was overthinking it for sure, but "😂" doesn't seem like a good response to concern for misuse. Thanks for the example outputs @radames .

Stable Diffusion concepts library org

You're right "??" deserved a much better answer.

For sure, I’ll rephrase: Did you consider any potential misuse before publishing it? Not trying to create an issue out of nothing, but given the levels of disinformation we’ve seen and the general concern of large models such as this in aiding disinformation, I would at least add a disclaimer in the model card to preempt any negative reception (warranted or not).

Any situation I’ve had where a photo of a negative test is required has already been an extremely flawed process (as @jspr basically pointed out), so I agree, no one’s using this to fake a test.

Anyway I get it’s just a dumb project for fun and I’m sorry for being a buzz kill.

Update: I'm an idiot and should mind my own business.

Sign up or log in to comment