README.md

---
license: apache-2.0
tags:
- moe
- frankenmoe
- merge
- mergekit
- lazymergekit
- flemmingmiguel/MBX-7B-v3
- Kukedlc/NeuTrixOmniBe-7B-model-remix
- PetroGPT/WestSeverus-7B-DPO
- vanillaOVO/supermario_v4
base_model:
- flemmingmiguel/MBX-7B-v3
- Kukedlc/NeuTrixOmniBe-7B-model-remix
- PetroGPT/WestSeverus-7B-DPO
- vanillaOVO/supermario_v4
---

# MixtureofMerges-MoE-4x7b-v4

MixtureofMerges-MoE-4x7b-v4 is a Mixure of Experts (MoE) made with the following models using [LazyMergekit](https://colab.research.google.com/drive/1obulZ1ROXHjYLn6PPZJwRR6GzgQogxxb?usp=sharing):
* [flemmingmiguel/MBX-7B-v3](https://huggingface.co/flemmingmiguel/MBX-7B-v3)
* [Kukedlc/NeuTrixOmniBe-7B-model-remix](https://huggingface.co/Kukedlc/NeuTrixOmniBe-7B-model-remix)
* [PetroGPT/WestSeverus-7B-DPO](https://huggingface.co/PetroGPT/WestSeverus-7B-DPO)
* [vanillaOVO/supermario_v4](https://huggingface.co/vanillaOVO/supermario_v4)

## 🧩 Configuration

```yaml
base_model: Kukedlc/NeuTrixOmniBe-7B-model-remix
gate_mode: hidden
dtype: bfloat16
experts:
  - source_model: flemmingmiguel/MBX-7B-v3
    positive_prompts:
      - "Answer this question from the ARC (Argument Reasoning Comprehension)."
      - "Use common sense and logical reasoning skills."
      - "What assumptions does this argument rely on?"
      - "Are these assumptions valid? Explain."
      - "Could this be explained in a different way? Provide an alternative explanation."
      - "Identify any weaknesses in this argument."
      - "Does this argument contain any logical fallacies? If so, which ones?"
    negative_prompts:
      - "misses key evidence"
      - "overly general"
      - "focuses on irrelevant details"
      - "assumes information not provided"
      - "relies on stereotypes"
  - source_model: Kukedlc/NeuTrixOmniBe-7B-model-remix
    positive_prompts:
      - "Answer this question, demonstrating commonsense understanding and using any relevant general knowledge you may have."
      - "Provide a concise summary of this passage, then explain why the highlighted section is essential to the main idea."
      - "Read these two brief articles presenting different viewpoints on the same topic. List their key arguments and highlight where they disagree."
      - "Paraphrase this statement, changing the emotional tone but keeping the core meaning intact. Example: Rephrase a worried statement in a humorous way"
      - "Create a short analogy that helps illustrate the main concept of this article."
    negative_prompts:
      - "sounds too basic"
      - "understated"
      - "dismisses important details"
      - "avoids the question's nuance"
      - "takes this statement too literally"
  - source_model: PetroGPT/WestSeverus-7B-DPO
    positive_prompts:
      - "Calculate the answer to this math problem"
      - "My mathematical capabilities are strong, allowing me to handle complex mathematical queries"
      - "solve for"
      - "A store sells apples at $0.50 each. If Emily buys 12 apples, how much does she need to pay?"
      - "Isolate x in the following equation: 2x + 5 = 17"
      - "Solve this equation and show your working."
      - "Explain why you used this formula to solve the problem."
      - "Attempt to divide this number by zero. Explain why this cannot be done."
    negative_prompts:
      - "incorrect"
      - "inaccurate"
      - "creativity"
      - "assumed without proof"
      - "rushed calculation"
      - "confuses mathematical concepts"
      - "draws illogical conclusions"
      - "circular reasoning"
  - source_model: vanillaOVO/supermario_v4
    positive_prompts:
      - "Generate a few possible continuations to this scenario."
      - "Demonstrate understanding of everyday commonsense in your response."
      - "Use contextual clues to determine the most likely outcome."
      - "Continue this scenario, but make the writing style sound archaic and overly formal."
      - "This narrative is predictable. Can you introduce an unexpected yet plausible twist?"
      - "The character is angry. Continue this scenario showcasing a furious outburst."
    negative_prompts:
      - "repetitive phrases"
      - "overuse of the same words"
      - "contradicts earlier statements - breaks the internal logic of the scenario"
      - "out of character dialogue"
      - "awkward phrasing - sounds unnatural"
      - "doesn't match the given genre"
```

## 💻 Usage

```python
!pip install -qU transformers bitsandbytes accelerate

from transformers import AutoTokenizer
import transformers
import torch

model = "jsfs11/MixtureofMerges-MoE-4x7b-v4"

tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model)
pipeline = transformers.pipeline(
    "text-generation",
    model=model,
    model_kwargs={"torch_dtype": torch.float16, "load_in_4bit": True},
)

messages = [{"role": "user", "content": "Explain what a Mixture of Experts is in less than 100 words."}]
prompt = pipeline.tokenizer.apply_chat_template(messages, tokenize=False, add_generation_prompt=True)
outputs = pipeline(prompt, max_new_tokens=256, do_sample=True, temperature=0.7, top_k=50, top_p=0.95)
print(outputs[0]["generated_text"])
```