Datasets:

xzhan2003

/

800kft

like 0

No way, I had a connecting flight out of Salt Lake City one time. Small world

DIY

da8j2zs

t3_5dz251

t1_da8gnsa

I have family in Utah

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['All content must be DIY', 'Sitewide Rules', 'Rude or abusive behavior; toxic comments; or harassing others', 'No advertising of any kind is permitted. Such posts will be removed and the offender banned', 'Google First, Reddit Last', 'Low effort posts', 'Sexually suggestive and inappropriate comments', 'Not a post for /r/DIY', 'Searching for products', 'Rating manufacturers and reviewing products', 'Using /r/DIY to promote your social media and social commerce channels'] ### Context: I have family in Utah ### Text: No way, I had a connecting flight out of Salt Lake City one time. Small world

['All content must be DIY', 'Sitewide Rules', 'Rude or abusive behavior; toxic comments; or harassing others', 'No advertising of any kind is permitted. Such posts will be removed and the offender banned', 'Google First, Reddit Last', 'Low effort posts', 'Sexually suggestive and inappropriate comments', 'Not a post for /r/DIY', 'Searching for products', 'Rating manufacturers and reviewing products', 'Using /r/DIY to promote your social media and social commerce channels']

>It did great when we had it. Top Gear was a good example of some of the problems with netflix. You never had the entire series, even the series you did have had random episodes missing, and series seen to appear/disappear frequently. The amount of region hopping I had to do for one program was ridiculous (seem to remember it was US for early seasons, UK for the later ones. I was in the middle of binge watching it when you pulled the series I was in the middle of watching. I ended up just torrenting the entire thing which resulted in a much less stressful experience. So ironically I had a netflix subscription which had top gear but I'd watch from local video files because it was easier - I'd love to know how your metrics account for that!

IAmA

d6e5nzm

t3_4xay9k

t1_d6e4l7v

[deleted]

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['All posts must contain proof', 'Topics must follow IAmA guidelines', 'Requests belong in /r/IAmARequests', 'Top-level comments must ask a question', 'Do not ask for personal favors from an OP', 'Do not bypass rules by adding ? to a non-question', 'No abusive or harassing comments', 'Please See Our FAQ'] ### Context: [deleted] ### Text: >It did great when we had it. Top Gear was a good example of some of the problems with netflix. You never had the entire series, even the series you did have had random episodes missing, and series seen to appear/disappear frequently. The amount of region hopping I had to do for one program was ridiculous (seem to remember it was US for early seasons, UK for the later ones. I was in the middle of binge watching it when you pulled the series I was in the middle of watching. I ended up just torrenting the entire thing which resulted in a much less stressful experience. So ironically I had a netflix subscription which had top gear but I'd watch from local video files because it was easier - I'd love to know how your metrics account for that!

['All posts must contain proof', 'Topics must follow IAmA guidelines', 'Requests belong in /r/IAmARequests', 'Top-level comments must ask a question', 'Do not ask for personal favors from an OP', 'Do not bypass rules by adding ? to a non-question', 'No abusive or harassing comments', 'Please See Our FAQ']

Lemme get 1 of each

BlackPeopleTwitter

dassg4d

t3_5giyb2

t1_dasrlqx

There are many purveyors of magical creams, salves, elixirs, herbs, ointments, and pills

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Social media posts from black people only', 'Bad Faith Participation', 'Respectability', 'No Racism/Hate speech', 'Posts must be showcasing somebody being hilarious or insightful on social media.', 'Reddit Cliches', 'No reposts', 'Bad post title', "Don't complain about the use of AAVE or slang.", 'Please respect these voices of the users of this community', 'No posts from corporate or meme accounts', 'Moderator Fiat', '☑️ Country Club'] ### Context: There are many purveyors of magical creams, salves, elixirs, herbs, ointments, and pills ### Text: Lemme get 1 of each

['Social media posts from black people only', 'Bad Faith Participation', 'Respectability', 'No Racism/Hate speech', 'Posts must be showcasing somebody being hilarious or insightful on social media.', 'Reddit Cliches', 'No reposts', 'Bad post title', "Don't complain about the use of AAVE or slang.", 'Please respect these voices of the users of this community', 'No posts from corporate or meme accounts', 'Moderator Fiat', '☑️ Country Club']

İ hope so

gaming

dbr57w0

t3_5koke1

t1_dbppc3l

Nope, Sodium Chloride

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Not directly gaming related or generic meme template', 'Posting guidelines, bandwagons, brigades, direct reply posts.', 'Piracy', 'Unmarked spoiler / Unmarked NSFW.', 'No Giveaways / Trades / Contests / Items for sale / Donation requests / Crypto anything', 'Not original source / Website screenshot', 'Spam / Excessive self-promotion', 'Discussion prompts must be posted as self/text posts', 'Bigotry / Incivility / Toxicity', 'AMA related rule.'] ### Context: Nope, Sodium Chloride ### Text: İ hope so

['Not directly gaming related or generic meme template', 'Posting guidelines, bandwagons, brigades, direct reply posts.', 'Piracy', 'Unmarked spoiler / Unmarked NSFW.', 'No Giveaways / Trades / Contests / Items for sale / Donation requests / Crypto anything', 'Not original source / Website screenshot', 'Spam / Excessive self-promotion', 'Discussion prompts must be posted as self/text posts', 'Bigotry / Incivility / Toxicity', 'AMA related rule.']

Only legendaries I'm missing is Diance, Hoopa, Genesect, Victini, Meleotta and Keldeo

pokemontrades

d6k2zoj

t3_4y0zon

t1_d6k2oxm

Sorry, I am not interested in shiny Wailmer. Would you like a legendary? I have most of them.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No trading of hacked, cloned, or illegal Pokémon.', 'Do not offer or trade Pokémon of uncertain legitimacy.', 'Full details must be posted for shiny and event Pokémon.', 'Do not discuss trades privately.', 'No IOU trades. Reservations are restricted.', 'Be respectful.', 'Do not post threads more than once per 6 hours.', 'Content must relate to Pokémon trading.', 'Contests and giveaways must follow certain rules.', 'You must set your flair and tag your threads. Pokéball flair is required for shiny or event Pokémon.'] ### Context: Sorry, I am not interested in shiny Wailmer. Would you like a legendary? I have most of them. ### Text: Only legendaries I'm missing is Diance, Hoopa, Genesect, Victini, Meleotta and Keldeo

['No trading of hacked, cloned, or illegal Pokémon.', 'Do not offer or trade Pokémon of uncertain legitimacy.', 'Full details must be posted for shiny and event Pokémon.', 'Do not discuss trades privately.', 'No IOU trades. Reservations are restricted.', 'Be respectful.', 'Do not post threads more than once per 6 hours.', 'Content must relate to Pokémon trading.', 'Contests and giveaways must follow certain rules.', 'You must set your flair and tag your threads. Pokéball flair is required for shiny or event Pokémon.']

well it's full of retarded people, but sometimes there is good offers, it's a good website you should try it.

GlobalOffensiveTrade

d3xdja9

t3_4mpuxi

t1_d3xdbrc

Do you find good trades there? I mostly get scammers :/

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: [] ### Context: Do you find good trades there? I mostly get scammers :/ ### Text: well it's full of retarded people, but sometimes there is good offers, it's a good website you should try it.

[]

Poo in loo pajeet not on plate

food

d601l4i

t3_4vlf25

t1_d5zo1qp

Wtf is wrong with you.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Original Images only (OC Only)', "Titles May Only Contain the Food's Name", 'Add a [Tag] into Your Title', 'No Low-Quality Posts or Comments', 'Be Nice', 'No Abusive Circlejerks', 'Spam/NSFW Gif or Image Comment', 'Blog/Website Linking'] ### Context: Wtf is wrong with you. ### Text: Poo in loo pajeet not on plate

['Original Images only (OC Only)', "Titles May Only Contain the Food's Name", 'Add a [Tag] into Your Title', 'No Low-Quality Posts or Comments', 'Be Nice', 'No Abusive Circlejerks', 'Spam/NSFW Gif or Image Comment', 'Blog/Website Linking']

http://imgur.com/a/jsaDQ

depression

d63uq0g

t3_4w3ikw

t1_d63p4sb

If you want someone to talk too just PM me because you're not trash mate.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Posts must request personal support for depressive disorders in yourself, or someone close to you', 'All replies must be personal, empathetic, and responsive to OP. No tough love or debate.', 'Offer help ONLY via public comments. No "I\'m here to help" posts or PM/chat requests', 'No low-content posts or responses', "Don't role-model or act as an authority. No achievement/advice posts or AMAs", 'No general uplifting content of any kind, including "it gets better" or other unkeepable promises', 'Do not give or request clinical advice or advocate for or against treatments & self-help strategies', 'NO methods for any type of self-harm, or validating self-destructive intent', "Don't encourage rule-breaking or off-topic content", 'No activism, debate or unapproved surveys including casual or general questions and polls', 'Absolutely no self-promotion of any kind, including creative writing or other arts', 'Do not request or offer money, goods, or services'] ### Context: If you want someone to talk too just PM me because you're not trash mate. ### Text: http://imgur.com/a/jsaDQ

['Posts must request personal support for depressive disorders in yourself, or someone close to you', 'All replies must be personal, empathetic, and responsive to OP. No tough love or debate.', 'Offer help ONLY via public comments. No "I\'m here to help" posts or PM/chat requests', 'No low-content posts or responses', "Don't role-model or act as an authority. No achievement/advice posts or AMAs", 'No general uplifting content of any kind, including "it gets better" or other unkeepable promises', 'Do not give or request clinical advice or advocate for or against treatments & self-help strategies', 'NO methods for any type of self-harm, or validating self-destructive intent', "Don't encourage rule-breaking or off-topic content", 'No activism, debate or unapproved surveys including casual or general questions and polls', 'Absolutely no self-promotion of any kind, including creative writing or other arts', 'Do not request or offer money, goods, or services']

Apple is fixing/replacing those for free, even out of warranty. That is the big point here. Google is a shit company and apple is great with repairs and service.

Android

dbkgsbc

t3_5jkwky

t1_dbhqo4f

iPhones are having the exact same problem though, so don't think you can avoid it if you switch. http://www.businessinsider.com.au/iphone-6-s-apple-battery-replacements-shutdown-bug-2016-11?r=UK&IR=T. http://www.phonearena.com/news/iOS-10.1.1-reported-to-drain-users-batteries_id88354

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Rule 1 - Off Topic', 'Rule 2 - No support questions/rants/bug-reports', 'Rule 3 - Images/videos in self-posts', 'Rule 4 - No self-promotional spamming', 'Rule 5 - No reposts or blog-spam/rehosted content', 'Rule 6 - No editorializing titles', 'Rule 7 - No piracy', 'Rule 8 - No unauthorized polls, bots or giveaways.', 'Rule 9 - No offensive or low-effort comments.', 'Rule 10 - No affiliate links'] ### Context: iPhones are having the exact same problem though, so don't think you can avoid it if you switch. http://www.businessinsider.com.au/iphone-6-s-apple-battery-replacements-shutdown-bug-2016-11?r=UK&IR=T. http://www.phonearena.com/news/iOS-10.1.1-reported-to-drain-users-batteries_id88354 ### Text: Apple is fixing/replacing those for free, even out of warranty. That is the big point here. Google is a shit company and apple is great with repairs and service.

['Rule 1 - Off Topic', 'Rule 2 - No support questions/rants/bug-reports', 'Rule 3 - Images/videos in self-posts', 'Rule 4 - No self-promotional spamming', 'Rule 5 - No reposts or blog-spam/rehosted content', 'Rule 6 - No editorializing titles', 'Rule 7 - No piracy', 'Rule 8 - No unauthorized polls, bots or giveaways.', 'Rule 9 - No offensive or low-effort comments.', 'Rule 10 - No affiliate links']

The one I found really annoying was Hanzo shooting his dragons though a damn wall.

Games

d31cm6b

t3_4itsbf

t1_d3190ub

I feel like most won't instantly kill you, so it's not a big deal if there's no identifier. He posted acting like all ults instantly kill everyone..I can't really think of any that don't at least give you a chance to kill the person first or run away

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No content primarily for humor or entertainment', 'No Attacks / Witch-hunts / Bigotry / Inflammatory language', 'No off-topic or low-effort content or comments', 'No duplicate posts', 'No enabling or linking to piracy', 'Formatting Requirements (All of Rule 6)', 'Specific Content Restrictions (All of Rule 7)', 'Follow promotional limits'] ### Context: I feel like most won't instantly kill you, so it's not a big deal if there's no identifier. He posted acting like all ults instantly kill everyone..I can't really think of any that don't at least give you a chance to kill the person first or run away ### Text: The one I found really annoying was Hanzo shooting his dragons though a damn wall.

['No content primarily for humor or entertainment', 'No Attacks / Witch-hunts / Bigotry / Inflammatory language', 'No off-topic or low-effort content or comments', 'No duplicate posts', 'No enabling or linking to piracy', 'Formatting Requirements (All of Rule 6)', 'Specific Content Restrictions (All of Rule 7)', 'Follow promotional limits']

Lol. This is hilarious.

AskReddit

d3tl9zb

t3_4m73ku

t1_d3tipbu

I think I may have found it. Did you send me two messages, three short paragraphs each? Is our mutual friend female with a first name beginning in R?

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Rule 1 - Questions must be clear and direct and may not use the body textbox', 'Rule 2 - No personal or professional advice requests', 'Rule 3 - Open ended questions only', 'Rule 4 - No personal info', 'Rule 5 - No loaded questions', 'Rule 6 - [Serious] tagged posts are off-limits to jokes or irrelevant replies', 'Rule 7 - No begging for goods or services, or Reddit rewards', 'Rule 8 - Be respectful to other users at all times and conduct your behaviour in a civil manner', 'Rule 9 - No image only replies or large ascii art', 'Rule 10 - Harmful Misinformation', 'Rule 11 - No spam, machine generated content or karma farming'] ### Context: I think I may have found it. Did you send me two messages, three short paragraphs each? Is our mutual friend female with a first name beginning in R? ### Text: Lol. This is hilarious.

['Rule 1 - Questions must be clear and direct and may not use the body textbox', 'Rule 2 - No personal or professional advice requests', 'Rule 3 - Open ended questions only', 'Rule 4 - No personal info', 'Rule 5 - No loaded questions', 'Rule 6 - [Serious] tagged posts are off-limits to jokes or irrelevant replies', 'Rule 7 - No begging for goods or services, or Reddit rewards', 'Rule 8 - Be respectful to other users at all times and conduct your behaviour in a civil manner', 'Rule 9 - No image only replies or large ascii art', 'Rule 10 - Harmful Misinformation', 'Rule 11 - No spam, machine generated content or karma farming']

Let me know when you get an offer, I'd actually be interested in seeing who actually sells at 80%.

GlobalOffensiveTrade

d45nyvx

t3_4nosb5

t1_d45nuvy

[deleted]

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: [] ### Context: [deleted] ### Text: Let me know when you get an offer, I'd actually be interested in seeing who actually sells at 80%.

[]

Wait, wow, you can get the Sumerian beer (when in season)? Looks like it is a faithful recreation and not just "based on" the ancient brew? https://www.beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/64/1587/ https://jjchristie.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/review-dogfish-head-midas-touch-golden-elixir/

AskHistorians

d6mwxe0

t3_4yd0kd

t1_d6mwbbb

Patrick McGovern at the University of Pennsylvania has written a number of articles on early fermented beverages, analyzing the chemicals found in ancient vessels to try to determine the ingredients and process used. He has also consulted with a contemporary brewery, Dogfish Head, to actually try to create reproductions of these ancient beverages. Among others, see: [A funerary feast fit for King Midas (Nature, 402)](http://www.penn.museum/sites/biomoleculararchaeology/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/NatureMidas.pdf) [Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China (PNAS, 101[51]) ](http://www.pnas.org/content/101/51/17593.abstract) [9,000-Year-Old Beer Re-Created From Chinese Recipe (National Geographic)](http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0718_050718_ancientbeer.html)

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Users shall behave with courtesy and politeness', 'Questions should be clear and specific, be asked in good faith, and seek an in-depth answer.', 'Questions should be historical in nature, and ask for more than basic facts', 'Users should be able to provide sources on request', 'Answers must be in-depth and comprehensive', 'Answers should reflect knowledge and familiarity with the topic at hand', 'Answers should not be speculative or anecdotal', 'No questions that are soapboxing, or about events and politics <20 years', 'No political agendas or moralising in answers', 'Answers should not be only links or quotations', 'Answers must be original work, and cite all quotes', 'Comments should not consist solely of jokes', 'Racist or bigoted comments are not tolerated here', 'Top level comments should be answers only, and ALL comments should be on-topic, and constructive'] ### Context: Patrick McGovern at the University of Pennsylvania has written a number of articles on early fermented beverages, analyzing the chemicals found in ancient vessels to try to determine the ingredients and process used. He has also consulted with a contemporary brewery, Dogfish Head, to actually try to create reproductions of these ancient beverages. Among others, see: [A funerary feast fit for King Midas (Nature, 402)](http://www.penn.museum/sites/biomoleculararchaeology/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/NatureMidas.pdf) [Fermented beverages of pre- and proto-historic China (PNAS, 101[51]) ](http://www.pnas.org/content/101/51/17593.abstract) [9,000-Year-Old Beer Re-Created From Chinese Recipe (National Geographic)](http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2005/07/0718_050718_ancientbeer.html) ### Text: Wait, wow, you can get the Sumerian beer (when in season)? Looks like it is a faithful recreation and not just "based on" the ancient brew? https://www.beeradvocate.com/beer/profile/64/1587/ https://jjchristie.wordpress.com/2009/02/12/review-dogfish-head-midas-touch-golden-elixir/

['Users shall behave with courtesy and politeness', 'Questions should be clear and specific, be asked in good faith, and seek an in-depth answer.', 'Questions should be historical in nature, and ask for more than basic facts', 'Users should be able to provide sources on request', 'Answers must be in-depth and comprehensive', 'Answers should reflect knowledge and familiarity with the topic at hand', 'Answers should not be speculative or anecdotal', 'No questions that are soapboxing, or about events and politics <20 years', 'No political agendas or moralising in answers', 'Answers should not be only links or quotations', 'Answers must be original work, and cite all quotes', 'Comments should not consist solely of jokes', 'Racist or bigoted comments are not tolerated here', 'Top level comments should be answers only, and ALL comments should be on-topic, and constructive']

Dish still has a licensable IP in Blockbuster Video, but Dish doesn't own any Blockbuster locations. If you see one, it is likely an independent video store licensing the name through an existing contract.

television

d95uj67

t3_5947v3

t1_d95ub3l

There is still a few Blockbuster locations IIRC.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No spoilers', 'No piracy', 'No duplicate news/old news', 'No low quality listicles', 'No political reporting except for late night shows', 'No bad/vague/false/misleading/etc. titles', 'No being uncivil to other users', 'No asking for a recommendation', 'No requests to help remember or find something', 'No non-top level sources', 'No gossip', 'No off-topic posts', 'Other rules'] ### Context: There is still a few Blockbuster locations IIRC. ### Text: Dish still has a licensable IP in Blockbuster Video, but Dish doesn't own any Blockbuster locations. If you see one, it is likely an independent video store licensing the name through an existing contract.

['No spoilers', 'No piracy', 'No duplicate news/old news', 'No low quality listicles', 'No political reporting except for late night shows', 'No bad/vague/false/misleading/etc. titles', 'No being uncivil to other users', 'No asking for a recommendation', 'No requests to help remember or find something', 'No non-top level sources', 'No gossip', 'No off-topic posts', 'Other rules']

Not sure. Just read through your previous posts and can imagine you are in a tough place right now. I was wondering what is freaking you out at the moment...

SuicideWatch

d39lnma

t3_4ju0ol

t1_d39l7cu

[deleted]

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: [] ### Context: [deleted] ### Text: Not sure. Just read through your previous posts and can imagine you are in a tough place right now. I was wondering what is freaking you out at the moment...

[]

Three types: the lumberjacks in a nerd's body also wear floral print. Trust me.

pokemon

d4iftmi

t3_4p5tw6

t1_d4ifj97

So is Ash gay or a big party animal? Because only two types of guys wear those kinds of shirts...

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Submissions must be related to Pokémon', 'Be civil', 'Follow discussion and poll post restrictions', 'No reposts or posting too quickly', 'Original content only', 'No arts/crafts during weekends', 'No memes outside of Monday and Tuesday', 'No screenshots or merchandise', 'Follow post title guidelines', 'No trades or other exchanges', 'No advertisement or self-promotion (click for exceptions)', "No unboxing videos, unofficial streams, or Let's Play! videos", 'Flag spoilers appropriately', 'No illegal content', 'No explicit or violent content'] ### Context: So is Ash gay or a big party animal? Because only two types of guys wear those kinds of shirts... ### Text: Three types: the lumberjacks in a nerd's body also wear floral print. Trust me.

['Submissions must be related to Pokémon', 'Be civil', 'Follow discussion and poll post restrictions', 'No reposts or posting too quickly', 'Original content only', 'No arts/crafts during weekends', 'No memes outside of Monday and Tuesday', 'No screenshots or merchandise', 'Follow post title guidelines', 'No trades or other exchanges', 'No advertisement or self-promotion (click for exceptions)', "No unboxing videos, unofficial streams, or Let's Play! videos", 'Flag spoilers appropriately', 'No illegal content', 'No explicit or violent content']

These comics are done by Zac Goreman. He's got a neat little trade paperback of all his video game-related doodles in full-color. Definitely worth a purchase.

books

d4jqhnj

t3_4p8f3o

t1_d4jk3fc

Is there archive of all of these

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Discussion is the Goal', 'Uncivil behavior', 'Recommendation Requests', "What's That Book Called?", 'Promotional', 'Distribution or solicitation for pirated material', 'Unmarked spoilers', 'Homework help request', 'Image-Only/Video-Only', 'Low Quality Book List', 'Full Rules and Guidelines'] ### Context: Is there archive of all of these ### Text: These comics are done by Zac Goreman. He's got a neat little trade paperback of all his video game-related doodles in full-color. Definitely worth a purchase.

['Discussion is the Goal', 'Uncivil behavior', 'Recommendation Requests', "What's That Book Called?", 'Promotional', 'Distribution or solicitation for pirated material', 'Unmarked spoilers', 'Homework help request', 'Image-Only/Video-Only', 'Low Quality Book List', 'Full Rules and Guidelines']

Hint: check out his comment history. He doesn't shy away from the edge.

television

d98nv6j

t3_59huhs

t1_d98mwww

[deleted]

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No spoilers', 'No piracy', 'No duplicate news/old news', 'No low quality listicles', 'No political reporting except for late night shows', 'No bad/vague/false/misleading/etc. titles', 'No being uncivil to other users', 'No asking for a recommendation', 'No requests to help remember or find something', 'No non-top level sources', 'No gossip', 'No off-topic posts', 'Other rules'] ### Context: [deleted] ### Text: Hint: check out his comment history. He doesn't shy away from the edge.

['No spoilers', 'No piracy', 'No duplicate news/old news', 'No low quality listicles', 'No political reporting except for late night shows', 'No bad/vague/false/misleading/etc. titles', 'No being uncivil to other users', 'No asking for a recommendation', 'No requests to help remember or find something', 'No non-top level sources', 'No gossip', 'No off-topic posts', 'Other rules']

Lol more expensive than Dolphins tickets.

nfl

d32nx0o

t3_4j0qgf

t1_d32npfc

Its the Eagles, I'm surprised its that high.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Off Topic Content', 'Low effort/Joke Posts/Repost', 'Editorialized Title', 'All news should be sourced', 'Highlights: During Games', 'Personal Life/Off Field, Serious illness, deaths, and arrests for current or former players', 'Official threads are official and not unofficial', 'Original Content v. promotion and spam', 'Personal attack or any kind of slur', 'Off-Season Posting Policy'] ### Context: Its the Eagles, I'm surprised its that high. ### Text: Lol more expensive than Dolphins tickets.

['Off Topic Content', 'Low effort/Joke Posts/Repost', 'Editorialized Title', 'All news should be sourced', 'Highlights: During Games', 'Personal Life/Off Field, Serious illness, deaths, and arrests for current or former players', 'Official threads are official and not unofficial', 'Original Content v. promotion and spam', 'Personal attack or any kind of slur', 'Off-Season Posting Policy']

Salaries for doing what though? Our pay packets have to come from doing or making something useful that other people need or want. We're still a way away from finding out what those might be, other than rival government willy waving contests.

spacex

d867wij

t3_54t20h

t1_d85xbkx

You'd be expected to pay for your living quarters, space suit, food, etc. These expenses will cost a lot more than the trip itself, but I expect salaries on Mars to be quite high. You don't want to be late on your life support bill, and you definitely don't want to end up homeless.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Does it promote a healthy community and a civil discussion on the substance of the issue?', 'Is the post directly related to SpaceX? Is the comment on-topic?', 'Does the post contribute meaningful new information or questions to the community?', 'Does the post contribute to a serious, thoughtful and technically-oriented discussion?', "Do comments in a 'Technical' flair thread contribute to a serious and thoughtful discussion?", "Does the post have a good title, a clean link and the right format, and doesn't belong in a thread?"] ### Context: You'd be expected to pay for your living quarters, space suit, food, etc. These expenses will cost a lot more than the trip itself, but I expect salaries on Mars to be quite high. You don't want to be late on your life support bill, and you definitely don't want to end up homeless. ### Text: Salaries for doing what though? Our pay packets have to come from doing or making something useful that other people need or want. We're still a way away from finding out what those might be, other than rival government willy waving contests.

['Does it promote a healthy community and a civil discussion on the substance of the issue?', 'Is the post directly related to SpaceX? Is the comment on-topic?', 'Does the post contribute meaningful new information or questions to the community?', 'Does the post contribute to a serious, thoughtful and technically-oriented discussion?', "Do comments in a 'Technical' flair thread contribute to a serious and thoughtful discussion?", "Does the post have a good title, a clean link and the right format, and doesn't belong in a thread?"]

Well, I enjoy playing control since I'm not trying to climb ladder anymore and don't have a lot of time to play. That's why I was leaning to Bloodmage since it can be used in most control and even in some midrange decks. But I also really like Lightlord. Malygos is awesome but has trouble finding it's way in solid control decks...

hearthstone

d7t4cj0

t3_53hn9s

t1_d7t47y5

those are all good but what kinda decks do you play? what sort of deck would you add them in to?

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Content Unrelated to Hearthstone', 'Submission Restrictions', 'Behaviour', 'Accusations and Witch-Hunting', 'Self-Promotion', 'Reposts', 'Spoilers', 'Transactions', 'AMAs and Surveys', 'Legal', 'Incorrect Flair'] ### Context: those are all good but what kinda decks do you play? what sort of deck would you add them in to? ### Text: Well, I enjoy playing control since I'm not trying to climb ladder anymore and don't have a lot of time to play. That's why I was leaning to Bloodmage since it can be used in most control and even in some midrange decks. But I also really like Lightlord. Malygos is awesome but has trouble finding it's way in solid control decks...

['Content Unrelated to Hearthstone', 'Submission Restrictions', 'Behaviour', 'Accusations and Witch-Hunting', 'Self-Promotion', 'Reposts', 'Spoilers', 'Transactions', 'AMAs and Surveys', 'Legal', 'Incorrect Flair']

aight okay np gl

GlobalOffensiveTrade

dcohjge

t3_5p5bnl

t1_dcohfqo

nah bro only 52 firm :) its has decent amount of pink

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: [] ### Context: nah bro only 52 firm :) its has decent amount of pink ### Text: aight okay np gl

[]

Those are just as likely to be Trump supporters. More likely probably. Either way though the people doing that aren't going to be swayed by this kind of post. People need to vent so not a big deal but definitely not going to accomplish anything (not that it has to).

hillaryclinton

d37ikow

t3_4jj4b9

t1_d377sm2

What about the ones that come in here to downvote everything? They'll see it.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['R1: Trolling', 'R2: Offensive Content', 'R3: Personal Attack', 'R4: Meta posts', 'R5: Old News (older than 30 days)', 'R6: No Campaigning or Soliciting for 2020 candidates', 'R7: No Negativity Or Rehashing', 'R8: Misleading Content / Bad Source', 'R9: Civility', 'R10: Spam or Comment Spam'] ### Context: What about the ones that come in here to downvote everything? They'll see it. ### Text: Those are just as likely to be Trump supporters. More likely probably. Either way though the people doing that aren't going to be swayed by this kind of post. People need to vent so not a big deal but definitely not going to accomplish anything (not that it has to).

['R1: Trolling', 'R2: Offensive Content', 'R3: Personal Attack', 'R4: Meta posts', 'R5: Old News (older than 30 days)', 'R6: No Campaigning or Soliciting for 2020 candidates', 'R7: No Negativity Or Rehashing', 'R8: Misleading Content / Bad Source', 'R9: Civility', 'R10: Spam or Comment Spam']

He answered no questions about immigration, foreign policy or issues concerning First Nations.

CanadaPolitics

ddhcr4l

t3_5smptd

t1_ddgauk6

Skimming through that thread, it looks like he's only answered a handful of questions, and in a very superficial manner. He's said a couple times that he is living in Canada. He's implied that he considers ER too low a priority to discuss. He wants to treat pot like alcohol and tobacco. He's affirmed his Franco abilities, by referencing to having a tutor with him. Have I missed any answers? Overall, I'd call this yet another disappointing example of why political AMAs are a waste of time.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Rule 1 - Edited headline', 'Rule 2 - Not respectful', 'Rule 3 - Not substantive', 'Rule 4 - Direct advocacy', 'Rule 5 - Not Canadian / not recent', 'Rule 6 - Duplicate', 'Rule 7 - Reply to removal', 'Rule 8 - Downvoting', 'Rule 9 - Copy/paste'] ### Context: Skimming through that thread, it looks like he's only answered a handful of questions, and in a very superficial manner. He's said a couple times that he is living in Canada. He's implied that he considers ER too low a priority to discuss. He wants to treat pot like alcohol and tobacco. He's affirmed his Franco abilities, by referencing to having a tutor with him. Have I missed any answers? Overall, I'd call this yet another disappointing example of why political AMAs are a waste of time. ### Text: He answered no questions about immigration, foreign policy or issues concerning First Nations.

['Rule 1 - Edited headline', 'Rule 2 - Not respectful', 'Rule 3 - Not substantive', 'Rule 4 - Direct advocacy', 'Rule 5 - Not Canadian / not recent', 'Rule 6 - Duplicate', 'Rule 7 - Reply to removal', 'Rule 8 - Downvoting', 'Rule 9 - Copy/paste']

Yeah I was looking online at the list of Simon locations expecting to have to drive to Pleasanton/Livermore and I was very surprised when I saw Folsom on the list. It's only a 45 minute drive for me but I probably won't go there unless I have a huge minimum spend to meet.

churning

dcwv045

t3_5q2lr2

t1_dcwuo8p

This is a game changer for me. The Wal-Mart where I used to get my GCs, in Rocklin, just changed their policy to cash/debit only.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Rule 1 - Disrespectful behavior', 'Rule 2 - Award travel', 'Rule 3 - Daily/Weekly Threads', 'Rule 4 - Megathreads', 'Rule 5 - Referrals', 'Rule 7 - Direct link to blog', 'Rule 8 - Self promotion', 'Rule 9 - Selling or trading points', 'Rule 0 - Off topic', 'Rule 11 - Mod Discretion'] ### Context: This is a game changer for me. The Wal-Mart where I used to get my GCs, in Rocklin, just changed their policy to cash/debit only. ### Text: Yeah I was looking online at the list of Simon locations expecting to have to drive to Pleasanton/Livermore and I was very surprised when I saw Folsom on the list. It's only a 45 minute drive for me but I probably won't go there unless I have a huge minimum spend to meet.

['Rule 1 - Disrespectful behavior', 'Rule 2 - Award travel', 'Rule 3 - Daily/Weekly Threads', 'Rule 4 - Megathreads', 'Rule 5 - Referrals', 'Rule 7 - Direct link to blog', 'Rule 8 - Self promotion', 'Rule 9 - Selling or trading points', 'Rule 0 - Off topic', 'Rule 11 - Mod Discretion']

You dont make friends with salad

videos

dddmnk1

t3_5s865x

t1_dddlvb2

I just feel like you are not getting the point of the game. It's not just to get to the end but get to the end and have the majority of the people who were already voted out like you enough to vote for you. The guy is stupid and didn't fucking understand the point of the game. If there was not vote boom he wins, good for that guy. But it's been the same for over a decade.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Videos Only', 'No Politics', 'No Personal Information or Witch-Hunting', 'No Indirect Links', 'No Porn, Gore, or Death', 'No Solicitation of Votes or Views', 'No Hate Speech', 'No Public Freakouts', 'No Third Party Licensing', 'Very limited self-promotion / OC'] ### Context: I just feel like you are not getting the point of the game. It's not just to get to the end but get to the end and have the majority of the people who were already voted out like you enough to vote for you. The guy is stupid and didn't fucking understand the point of the game. If there was not vote boom he wins, good for that guy. But it's been the same for over a decade. ### Text: You dont make friends with salad

['Videos Only', 'No Politics', 'No Personal Information or Witch-Hunting', 'No Indirect Links', 'No Porn, Gore, or Death', 'No Solicitation of Votes or Views', 'No Hate Speech', 'No Public Freakouts', 'No Third Party Licensing', 'Very limited self-promotion / OC']

It's because I don't watch John Oliver. I can't afford HBO.

Games

d3tupbx

t3_4m84fy

t1_d3tunkk

You, you're not as smart as the other guy.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No content primarily for humor or entertainment', 'No Attacks / Witch-hunts / Bigotry / Inflammatory language', 'No off-topic or low-effort content or comments', 'No duplicate posts', 'No enabling or linking to piracy', 'Formatting Requirements (All of Rule 6)', 'Specific Content Restrictions (All of Rule 7)', 'Follow promotional limits'] ### Context: You, you're not as smart as the other guy. ### Text: It's because I don't watch John Oliver. I can't afford HBO.

['No content primarily for humor or entertainment', 'No Attacks / Witch-hunts / Bigotry / Inflammatory language', 'No off-topic or low-effort content or comments', 'No duplicate posts', 'No enabling or linking to piracy', 'Formatting Requirements (All of Rule 6)', 'Specific Content Restrictions (All of Rule 7)', 'Follow promotional limits']

Thank you, I now identify as a waterytartocrat.

changemyview

d3dh76e

t3_4k83qf

t1_d3d2uub

I, for one, welcome our new waterytartocratic rulers.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ["Rule A - Doesn't Explain View", 'Rule B - 3rd Party/Devils Advocate/Soapboxing', 'Rule C - Unclear/Improper Title', 'Rule D - Neutral/Transgender/Harm a specific person/Promo/Meta', 'Rule E - No/Minimal Replies from OP in 3 hours', "Rule 1 - Doesn't Challenge OP (top-level only)", 'Rule 2 - Rude/Hostile Comment', 'Rule 3 - Bad Faith Accusation', 'Rule 4 - Delta Abuse/Misuse or Should Award Delta', "Rule 5 - Doesn't Contribute Meaningfully"] ### Context: I, for one, welcome our new waterytartocratic rulers. ### Text: Thank you, I now identify as a waterytartocrat.

["Rule A - Doesn't Explain View", 'Rule B - 3rd Party/Devils Advocate/Soapboxing', 'Rule C - Unclear/Improper Title', 'Rule D - Neutral/Transgender/Harm a specific person/Promo/Meta', 'Rule E - No/Minimal Replies from OP in 3 hours', "Rule 1 - Doesn't Challenge OP (top-level only)", 'Rule 2 - Rude/Hostile Comment', 'Rule 3 - Bad Faith Accusation', 'Rule 4 - Delta Abuse/Misuse or Should Award Delta', "Rule 5 - Doesn't Contribute Meaningfully"]

Chairman Pao was better than Steve Klansman

news

dadmwz3

t3_5elt56

t1_dadm9xx

I wonder what your comment read before it was edited.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Submissions must be articles about a specific news event', 'No opinion/analysis or advocacy pieces', 'Articles must not be primarily concerning politics', 'No editorialized titles; Title must match article title', 'No paywalls/blogspam that steals content', 'No posts covering an already submitted story', 'Do not be racist, sexist, vitriolic, or overly crude', 'Do not be unnecessarily rude or provocative', 'No cheap or distracting jokes or memes', 'No witchhunting. Follow the Reddit Content Policy.', 'Do not advocate or celebrate death', 'No bots/Novelty accounts'] ### Context: I wonder what your comment read before it was edited. ### Text: Chairman Pao was better than Steve Klansman

['Submissions must be articles about a specific news event', 'No opinion/analysis or advocacy pieces', 'Articles must not be primarily concerning politics', 'No editorialized titles; Title must match article title', 'No paywalls/blogspam that steals content', 'No posts covering an already submitted story', 'Do not be racist, sexist, vitriolic, or overly crude', 'Do not be unnecessarily rude or provocative', 'No cheap or distracting jokes or memes', 'No witchhunting. Follow the Reddit Content Policy.', 'Do not advocate or celebrate death', 'No bots/Novelty accounts']

don't call me serf you slave

canada

dcbk31o

t3_5ncnpr

t1_dcb3kal

dont call me a peasant you serf

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Editorialized or sensationalized headline / Titres éditorialisés ou sensationnalistes', 'Antagonistic to another person / Hostilité envers autrui', 'No negative generalizations, bigotry, prejudice, hatred / Pas de généralisations négatives, préjugés', "Post doesn't relate to Canada / Contenu sans lien avec le Canada", 'Low content / Contenu à faible teneur', 'Trolling: disrupting normal, on-topic discussion / perturber le cours normal d’une discussion', 'Duplicate or similar post already exists / Doublons ou contenu similaire', 'Flooding r/Canada with articles / Limite de soumission', 'No misinformation spreading'] ### Context: dont call me a peasant you serf ### Text: don't call me serf you slave

['Editorialized or sensationalized headline / Titres éditorialisés ou sensationnalistes', 'Antagonistic to another person / Hostilité envers autrui', 'No negative generalizations, bigotry, prejudice, hatred / Pas de généralisations négatives, préjugés', "Post doesn't relate to Canada / Contenu sans lien avec le Canada", 'Low content / Contenu à faible teneur', 'Trolling: disrupting normal, on-topic discussion / perturber le cours normal d’une discussion', 'Duplicate or similar post already exists / Doublons ou contenu similaire', 'Flooding r/Canada with articles / Limite de soumission', 'No misinformation spreading']

Thanks, it just feels so strange to me that they overestimate themselves so dramatically. My friend who is half my size even went over the damn one liners he would use (I wish that was a joke...)

depression

d62e76y

t3_4vy94j

t1_d62e2k1

Everyone is so influenced with this Hollywood hero, MMA fighter crap that they become so desensitised to the fact that a stab wound or taking on a group of guys will lead you to be hospitalized or worse dead. dude count your blessings. You are not weak for not trying to defend yourself and don't let anyone tell you other wise. Anyone who tells you that they would have taken them on, just laugh at their stupidity.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Posts must request personal support for depressive disorders in yourself, or someone close to you', 'All replies must be personal, empathetic, and responsive to OP. No tough love or debate.', 'Offer help ONLY via public comments. No "I\'m here to help" posts or PM/chat requests', 'No low-content posts or responses', "Don't role-model or act as an authority. No achievement/advice posts or AMAs", 'No general uplifting content of any kind, including "it gets better" or other unkeepable promises', 'Do not give or request clinical advice or advocate for or against treatments & self-help strategies', 'NO methods for any type of self-harm, or validating self-destructive intent', "Don't encourage rule-breaking or off-topic content", 'No activism, debate or unapproved surveys including casual or general questions and polls', 'Absolutely no self-promotion of any kind, including creative writing or other arts', 'Do not request or offer money, goods, or services'] ### Context: Everyone is so influenced with this Hollywood hero, MMA fighter crap that they become so desensitised to the fact that a stab wound or taking on a group of guys will lead you to be hospitalized or worse dead. dude count your blessings. You are not weak for not trying to defend yourself and don't let anyone tell you other wise. Anyone who tells you that they would have taken them on, just laugh at their stupidity. ### Text: Thanks, it just feels so strange to me that they overestimate themselves so dramatically. My friend who is half my size even went over the damn one liners he would use (I wish that was a joke...)

['Posts must request personal support for depressive disorders in yourself, or someone close to you', 'All replies must be personal, empathetic, and responsive to OP. No tough love or debate.', 'Offer help ONLY via public comments. No "I\'m here to help" posts or PM/chat requests', 'No low-content posts or responses', "Don't role-model or act as an authority. No achievement/advice posts or AMAs", 'No general uplifting content of any kind, including "it gets better" or other unkeepable promises', 'Do not give or request clinical advice or advocate for or against treatments & self-help strategies', 'NO methods for any type of self-harm, or validating self-destructive intent', "Don't encourage rule-breaking or off-topic content", 'No activism, debate or unapproved surveys including casual or general questions and polls', 'Absolutely no self-promotion of any kind, including creative writing or other arts', 'Do not request or offer money, goods, or services']

How was he annoying? He was like the "doubter" in the group who didn't accept all the crazy things right away. I thought his role was necessary to make the story a bit more grounded in reality.

television

d5jhfhz

t3_4tpr17

t1_d5jf69p

All the cast was amazing. Eleven, the mother (Winona), Jonathan, the big sister, Toothless, the doctor. The black kid was kinda annoying though.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No spoilers', 'No piracy', 'No duplicate news/old news', 'No low quality listicles', 'No political reporting except for late night shows', 'No bad/vague/false/misleading/etc. titles', 'No being uncivil to other users', 'No asking for a recommendation', 'No requests to help remember or find something', 'No non-top level sources', 'No gossip', 'No off-topic posts', 'Other rules'] ### Context: All the cast was amazing. Eleven, the mother (Winona), Jonathan, the big sister, Toothless, the doctor. The black kid was kinda annoying though. ### Text: How was he annoying? He was like the "doubter" in the group who didn't accept all the crazy things right away. I thought his role was necessary to make the story a bit more grounded in reality.

['No spoilers', 'No piracy', 'No duplicate news/old news', 'No low quality listicles', 'No political reporting except for late night shows', 'No bad/vague/false/misleading/etc. titles', 'No being uncivil to other users', 'No asking for a recommendation', 'No requests to help remember or find something', 'No non-top level sources', 'No gossip', 'No off-topic posts', 'Other rules']

She's actively served only her self. She lies incessantly about her involvement in that scandal. She is under investigation by the FBI. I don't like Trump, but people who can defend Hillary are just as blind. She's a comically evil politician who is so self-serving she fits right in at Washington, but that's what people are tired of. Honestly, someone who has a pending or ongoing investigation by the FBI for anything shouldn't be allowed to run for president. Let us pick new candidates. Fuck these two.

EnoughTrumpSpam

d9ey57k

t3_5a7p9x

t1_d9exbib

No. I have been watching her my entire voting life. She has the best resume. And, we can debate whether or not we like her results. But, to suggest that the partisan culture isn't actually something she's contributed to - for the last 30+ years- is pretty disingenuous.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Trump Troll', 'Incivility, personal attacks, calls to violence', 'Off-topic', 'Low-effort Shitpost', 'Bigotry', 'Self-promotion', 'Brigading', 'Illegitimate/non-primary source', 'Conspiracy Theory', 'Incest', '11. Titles Must Match Links'] ### Context: No. I have been watching her my entire voting life. She has the best resume. And, we can debate whether or not we like her results. But, to suggest that the partisan culture isn't actually something she's contributed to - for the last 30+ years- is pretty disingenuous. ### Text: She's actively served only her self. She lies incessantly about her involvement in that scandal. She is under investigation by the FBI. I don't like Trump, but people who can defend Hillary are just as blind. She's a comically evil politician who is so self-serving she fits right in at Washington, but that's what people are tired of. Honestly, someone who has a pending or ongoing investigation by the FBI for anything shouldn't be allowed to run for president. Let us pick new candidates. Fuck these two.

['Trump Troll', 'Incivility, personal attacks, calls to violence', 'Off-topic', 'Low-effort Shitpost', 'Bigotry', 'Self-promotion', 'Brigading', 'Illegitimate/non-primary source', 'Conspiracy Theory', 'Incest', '11. Titles Must Match Links']

Interesting theory! I've always thought she was more than just an avenue for people to wonder if Jon really was Ned's bastard, there's clearly some mystery revolving around her death, Harrenhal tourney and relationship with the Starks. Septa Lemore I never really looked into beyond unconventional septa, so now I'm going to have to go back and have another look at their descriptions.

asoiaf

d4tctq3

t3_4qilgm

t1_d4tbgdz

I just did a [Quora answer about Ashara Dayne and Aegon Targaryen](https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Ashara-Dayne-referenced-so-much-even-again-at-the-end-of-ADWD-in-R%2BL-J-given-how-rarely-GRRM-wastes-words/answer/PA-Shapiro?srid=Jqrm). Any thoughts?

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['R1 Civility Policy', 'R2 Uncovered Spoilers', 'R3 Title Policy', 'R4 Off topic', 'R5 Memes, Silly content, Fan Art, Meta, Swag Brag', 'R6 Piracy and Copyright Policy', 'R7 General Sketchiness', 'R8 Self-promotion', 'R9 Poll Posts'] ### Context: I just did a [Quora answer about Ashara Dayne and Aegon Targaryen](https://www.quora.com/Why-is-Ashara-Dayne-referenced-so-much-even-again-at-the-end-of-ADWD-in-R%2BL-J-given-how-rarely-GRRM-wastes-words/answer/PA-Shapiro?srid=Jqrm). Any thoughts? ### Text: Interesting theory! I've always thought she was more than just an avenue for people to wonder if Jon really was Ned's bastard, there's clearly some mystery revolving around her death, Harrenhal tourney and relationship with the Starks. Septa Lemore I never really looked into beyond unconventional septa, so now I'm going to have to go back and have another look at their descriptions.

['R1 Civility Policy', 'R2 Uncovered Spoilers', 'R3 Title Policy', 'R4 Off topic', 'R5 Memes, Silly content, Fan Art, Meta, Swag Brag', 'R6 Piracy and Copyright Policy', 'R7 General Sketchiness', 'R8 Self-promotion', 'R9 Poll Posts']

Or take gender studies. A fuck ton of that shit is coming from the other end of the horseshoe.

movies

d5fhjfl

t3_4t762k

t1_d5fca6u

Then they shouldn't read the bible.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Do Familiarize Yourself With Our Rules.', 'No Antagonism/Flamewars/Trolling - No Racial/Sexist/Dogwhistling/Homophobic Slurs', 'No Spam & Self-promotion - Same Source Posts', 'No Image Posts & Memes', 'No Ambiguous/Misleading/Inaccurate Information or Clickbait in The Submission Title', 'No Extraneous Comic Book Movie Submissions', 'No Repost or Discussion Threads of New Releases', 'No Spoilers', 'No Encouraging Piracy', 'No Subreddit Brigading', 'Prohibited Popular Websites', 'No AI generated content', "OP's question is easily googlable or otherwise over-discussed in /r/movies"] ### Context: Then they shouldn't read the bible. ### Text: Or take gender studies. A fuck ton of that shit is coming from the other end of the horseshoe.

['Do Familiarize Yourself With Our Rules.', 'No Antagonism/Flamewars/Trolling - No Racial/Sexist/Dogwhistling/Homophobic Slurs', 'No Spam & Self-promotion - Same Source Posts', 'No Image Posts & Memes', 'No Ambiguous/Misleading/Inaccurate Information or Clickbait in The Submission Title', 'No Extraneous Comic Book Movie Submissions', 'No Repost or Discussion Threads of New Releases', 'No Spoilers', 'No Encouraging Piracy', 'No Subreddit Brigading', 'Prohibited Popular Websites', 'No AI generated content', "OP's question is easily googlable or otherwise over-discussed in /r/movies"]

&gt; tweeted that nuclear reactors are actually disguised warhead By that logic couldn't any kind of a power plant be a warhead?

PoliticalDiscussion

d72r8sy

t3_508ozr

t1_d72itek

She's also an anti-vaxxer and has tweeted that nuclear reactors are actually disguised warheads. She's either a loon or she's pandering to them. I'm not sure which is worse.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Keep it Civil.', 'Meta', 'Low investment', 'Submissions should be an impartial discussion prompt + questions.', 'Provide some background and context. Offer substantive avenues for discussion.', 'Everything in the post should be directly related to a political issue.', 'Formatting and housekeeping things:'] ### Context: She's also an anti-vaxxer and has tweeted that nuclear reactors are actually disguised warheads. She's either a loon or she's pandering to them. I'm not sure which is worse. ### Text: &gt; tweeted that nuclear reactors are actually disguised warhead By that logic couldn't any kind of a power plant be a warhead?

['Keep it Civil.', 'Meta', 'Low investment', 'Submissions should be an impartial discussion prompt + questions.', 'Provide some background and context. Offer substantive avenues for discussion.', 'Everything in the post should be directly related to a political issue.', 'Formatting and housekeeping things:']

If I had done that, I'd be called a perv and be told to sit down and keep my eyes up. The teachers are my school were assholes.

TwoXChromosomes

d8t9pgo

t3_57ing3

t1_d8sezr7

That's awesome. I had a similar thing happen last year in my ninth grade class. A boy called me over and asked to talk outside. He was like "Sarah is sitting with her legs wide open and it looks like she's bleeding." Poor kid was mortified but so mature about it. I grabbed a tampon and pad from my desk (always keep them on hand!) and discreetly called Sarah out. A+ bro right there.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Respect', 'Equanimity', 'Grace', 'Relevance'] ### Context: That's awesome. I had a similar thing happen last year in my ninth grade class. A boy called me over and asked to talk outside. He was like "Sarah is sitting with her legs wide open and it looks like she's bleeding." Poor kid was mortified but so mature about it. I grabbed a tampon and pad from my desk (always keep them on hand!) and discreetly called Sarah out. A+ bro right there. ### Text: If I had done that, I'd be called a perv and be told to sit down and keep my eyes up. The teachers are my school were assholes.

['Respect', 'Equanimity', 'Grace', 'Relevance']

Thank you

LifeProTips

d5gbwhy

t3_4tbcbg

t1_d5gbfnf

It's too bad that all our technological sophistication adds up to little when it comes to job seeking. But frankly, Redditors are being naive little shits to blame you/the recruiters for using automation to assist with the candidate pruning process. Hard to believe of Redditors /s

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No rude, offensive, racist, homophobic, sexist, aggressive, or hateful posts/comments.', 'Posts must begin with "LPT" or "LPT Request” and be flaired. Titles should be descriptive.', 'Tag tips for adult audiences as NSFW.', 'Do not post tips that could be considered common sense, common courtesy, unethical, or illegal.', 'Do not post tips that are based on spurious, unsubstantiated, or anecdotal claims.', 'Posts concerning the following are not allowed:', 'Do not post tips in reaction to other posts. Reposts may be removed.', 'Do not post tips that are advertisements or recommendations of products or services.', "Content that trolls and/or doesn't substantially contribute to the discussion may be removed."] ### Context: It's too bad that all our technological sophistication adds up to little when it comes to job seeking. But frankly, Redditors are being naive little shits to blame you/the recruiters for using automation to assist with the candidate pruning process. Hard to believe of Redditors /s ### Text: Thank you

['No rude, offensive, racist, homophobic, sexist, aggressive, or hateful posts/comments.', 'Posts must begin with "LPT" or "LPT Request” and be flaired. Titles should be descriptive.', 'Tag tips for adult audiences as NSFW.', 'Do not post tips that could be considered common sense, common courtesy, unethical, or illegal.', 'Do not post tips that are based on spurious, unsubstantiated, or anecdotal claims.', 'Posts concerning the following are not allowed:', 'Do not post tips in reaction to other posts. Reposts may be removed.', 'Do not post tips that are advertisements or recommendations of products or services.', "Content that trolls and/or doesn't substantially contribute to the discussion may be removed."]

Surprised IATSE got you to that. Normally it's just charge the client another 4 hours for getting us coffee 2 minutes too late.

AskReddit

dagkr22

t3_5exl12

t1_dagkc1j

Yay, a hobbyist! Try doing it professionally in a 3,000 seat auditorium for a major touring act. Source: 10 years on the job for IATSE. You do not know what you're talking about.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Rule 1 - Questions must be clear and direct and may not use the body textbox', 'Rule 2 - No personal or professional advice requests', 'Rule 3 - Open ended questions only', 'Rule 4 - No personal info', 'Rule 5 - No loaded questions', 'Rule 6 - [Serious] tagged posts are off-limits to jokes or irrelevant replies', 'Rule 7 - No begging for goods or services, or Reddit rewards', 'Rule 8 - Be respectful to other users at all times and conduct your behaviour in a civil manner', 'Rule 9 - No image only replies or large ascii art', 'Rule 10 - Harmful Misinformation', 'Rule 11 - No spam, machine generated content or karma farming'] ### Context: Yay, a hobbyist! Try doing it professionally in a 3,000 seat auditorium for a major touring act. Source: 10 years on the job for IATSE. You do not know what you're talking about. ### Text: Surprised IATSE got you to that. Normally it's just charge the client another 4 hours for getting us coffee 2 minutes too late.

['Rule 1 - Questions must be clear and direct and may not use the body textbox', 'Rule 2 - No personal or professional advice requests', 'Rule 3 - Open ended questions only', 'Rule 4 - No personal info', 'Rule 5 - No loaded questions', 'Rule 6 - [Serious] tagged posts are off-limits to jokes or irrelevant replies', 'Rule 7 - No begging for goods or services, or Reddit rewards', 'Rule 8 - Be respectful to other users at all times and conduct your behaviour in a civil manner', 'Rule 9 - No image only replies or large ascii art', 'Rule 10 - Harmful Misinformation', 'Rule 11 - No spam, machine generated content or karma farming']

You must be a woman.

movies

d639q6z

t3_4w1jw8

t1_d639cny

1. The Prestige 2. Cloud Atlas 3. Raiders of the Lost Ark

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Do Familiarize Yourself With Our Rules.', 'No Antagonism/Flamewars/Trolling - No Racial/Sexist/Dogwhistling/Homophobic Slurs', 'No Spam & Self-promotion - Same Source Posts', 'No Image Posts & Memes', 'No Ambiguous/Misleading/Inaccurate Information or Clickbait in The Submission Title', 'No Extraneous Comic Book Movie Submissions', 'No Repost or Discussion Threads of New Releases', 'No Spoilers', 'No Encouraging Piracy', 'No Subreddit Brigading', 'Prohibited Popular Websites', 'No AI generated content', "OP's question is easily googlable or otherwise over-discussed in /r/movies"] ### Context: 1. The Prestige 2. Cloud Atlas 3. Raiders of the Lost Ark ### Text: You must be a woman.

['Do Familiarize Yourself With Our Rules.', 'No Antagonism/Flamewars/Trolling - No Racial/Sexist/Dogwhistling/Homophobic Slurs', 'No Spam & Self-promotion - Same Source Posts', 'No Image Posts & Memes', 'No Ambiguous/Misleading/Inaccurate Information or Clickbait in The Submission Title', 'No Extraneous Comic Book Movie Submissions', 'No Repost or Discussion Threads of New Releases', 'No Spoilers', 'No Encouraging Piracy', 'No Subreddit Brigading', 'Prohibited Popular Websites', 'No AI generated content', "OP's question is easily googlable or otherwise over-discussed in /r/movies"]

Post was deleted, what happened?

tifu

d38em50

t3_4jp03v

t1_d38e42b

No ! What!? Please elaborate , how did you bite it off so easily? Was there tension? Did you spit it out? Swallow it? Do you still have it? Did he get burried with it? Did the medics ask why his but was missing? Did you seal it in a bag and give it to them!

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Use proper formatting', 'Posts must be about you', 'Must be your fault', 'No overly vulgar posts/Illegal Advice', 'Must be actual fuckups', "Be civil and don't be disruptive", 'No self-promotion', 'Mod discretion'] ### Context: No ! What!? Please elaborate , how did you bite it off so easily? Was there tension? Did you spit it out? Swallow it? Do you still have it? Did he get burried with it? Did the medics ask why his but was missing? Did you seal it in a bag and give it to them! ### Text: Post was deleted, what happened?

['Use proper formatting', 'Posts must be about you', 'Must be your fault', 'No overly vulgar posts/Illegal Advice', 'Must be actual fuckups', "Be civil and don't be disruptive", 'No self-promotion', 'Mod discretion']

Judging other people as if you're any different is way more sad.

television

dbrptec

t3_5kyw4y

t1_dbrpcnf

Why do people people care about this? Me thinks it's people with empty lives that have nothing else to care about, so they care about someone that is in movingly pictures. SAD.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No spoilers', 'No piracy', 'No duplicate news/old news', 'No low quality listicles', 'No political reporting except for late night shows', 'No bad/vague/false/misleading/etc. titles', 'No being uncivil to other users', 'No asking for a recommendation', 'No requests to help remember or find something', 'No non-top level sources', 'No gossip', 'No off-topic posts', 'Other rules'] ### Context: Why do people people care about this? Me thinks it's people with empty lives that have nothing else to care about, so they care about someone that is in movingly pictures. SAD. ### Text: Judging other people as if you're any different is way more sad.

['No spoilers', 'No piracy', 'No duplicate news/old news', 'No low quality listicles', 'No political reporting except for late night shows', 'No bad/vague/false/misleading/etc. titles', 'No being uncivil to other users', 'No asking for a recommendation', 'No requests to help remember or find something', 'No non-top level sources', 'No gossip', 'No off-topic posts', 'Other rules']

Or.. you could get a life and stop replying to every comment I make on this subreddit. Also, you call me a child yet you are the one who thinks Paul Pierce is the greatest Celtic ever lmao Hold this L young blood

nba

d8j7giq

t3_56fcas

t1_d8j7c1f

original insults. come up with something for yourself. otherwise, you're gonna have to fucking block me. you keep adding fuel to the fire, you fucking child

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Be civil and respectful', 'No trolling or baiting users', 'No racist, sexist, or homophobic language', 'No reposts', 'No fake news', 'No self-promotion', 'No NSFW content', 'Posts and comments must be relevant to the NBA', 'Stats/Player Tweets/Quotes/Misc. Media are self-post only and must be sourced'] ### Context: original insults. come up with something for yourself. otherwise, you're gonna have to fucking block me. you keep adding fuel to the fire, you fucking child ### Text: Or.. you could get a life and stop replying to every comment I make on this subreddit. Also, you call me a child yet you are the one who thinks Paul Pierce is the greatest Celtic ever lmao Hold this L young blood

['Be civil and respectful', 'No trolling or baiting users', 'No racist, sexist, or homophobic language', 'No reposts', 'No fake news', 'No self-promotion', 'No NSFW content', 'Posts and comments must be relevant to the NBA', 'Stats/Player Tweets/Quotes/Misc. Media are self-post only and must be sourced']

France has been *fiercely* secular ever since the French Revolution.

atheism

d6v7v48

t3_4zciym

t1_d6v7ta8

&gt; France is first and foremost proud of being a secular nation lolno. You should look up what secularism is. France is not secular.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No Trolling', 'Personal Attacks or Flaming', 'Off Topic', 'Image not submitted correctly.', 'Spam', 'Low-Effort Posts', 'Proselytizing', 'Reddit Rule: Harassment or Bigotry', 'Reddit rule: Brigading'] ### Context: &gt; France is first and foremost proud of being a secular nation lolno. You should look up what secularism is. France is not secular. ### Text: France has been *fiercely* secular ever since the French Revolution.

['No Trolling', 'Personal Attacks or Flaming', 'Off Topic', 'Image not submitted correctly.', 'Spam', 'Low-Effort Posts', 'Proselytizing', 'Reddit Rule: Harassment or Bigotry', 'Reddit rule: Brigading']

I'm sure that a kiln would help

whatisthisthing

d7o0yju

t3_52qjq4

t1_d7nu4n7

That's a really good question. I don't know the exact answer but I do know that glass with a poor ratio of silica and lime is more likely to degrade. Also, part of the degradation is the movement of alkeline ions from the glass matrix. I think a damp, alkeline environment would probably be most conducive to that.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Be civil', 'Be helpful / No Jokes', 'Try to include a link...', 'Reply "Solved!"', 'DO NOT DELETE YOUR POST', 'Be detailed', 'Do not use URL shorteners or tracking links', 'Check the F.A.T.', 'Posts must adhere to submission guidelines'] ### Context: That's a really good question. I don't know the exact answer but I do know that glass with a poor ratio of silica and lime is more likely to degrade. Also, part of the degradation is the movement of alkeline ions from the glass matrix. I think a damp, alkeline environment would probably be most conducive to that. ### Text: I'm sure that a kiln would help

['Be civil', 'Be helpful / No Jokes', 'Try to include a link...', 'Reply "Solved!"', 'DO NOT DELETE YOUR POST', 'Be detailed', 'Do not use URL shorteners or tracking links', 'Check the F.A.T.', 'Posts must adhere to submission guidelines']

Don't look too hard, I couldn't differentiate so to me that looked like 100% real naked Daenerys. My penis didn't notice anything off.

gameofthrones

d3715fy

t3_4jj4n1

t1_d370d9e

Was that CGI at the end? Edit: I mean her body

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Relevancy (Not about GOT/ASOIAF)', 'Relevancy (Meta)', 'Safety (Spoilers)', 'Quality (Meme or other low-effort content)', 'Quality (Repost)', 'Maturity (Drama/Trolling)', 'Maturity (Sexual Objectification)', 'Legality (Piracy/Leaks)', 'Legality (Copyright Infringement)'] ### Context: Was that CGI at the end? Edit: I mean her body ### Text: Don't look too hard, I couldn't differentiate so to me that looked like 100% real naked Daenerys. My penis didn't notice anything off.

['Relevancy (Not about GOT/ASOIAF)', 'Relevancy (Meta)', 'Safety (Spoilers)', 'Quality (Meme or other low-effort content)', 'Quality (Repost)', 'Maturity (Drama/Trolling)', 'Maturity (Sexual Objectification)', 'Legality (Piracy/Leaks)', 'Legality (Copyright Infringement)']

http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5

Android

d5h5whc

t3_4tg70f

t1_d5h1hqp

I just hope Nexus 5 gets the official version of Nougat.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Rule 1 - Off Topic', 'Rule 2 - No support questions/rants/bug-reports', 'Rule 3 - Images/videos in self-posts', 'Rule 4 - No self-promotional spamming', 'Rule 5 - No reposts or blog-spam/rehosted content', 'Rule 6 - No editorializing titles', 'Rule 7 - No piracy', 'Rule 8 - No unauthorized polls, bots or giveaways.', 'Rule 9 - No offensive or low-effort comments.', 'Rule 10 - No affiliate links'] ### Context: I just hope Nexus 5 gets the official version of Nougat. ### Text: http://forum.xda-developers.com/google-nexus-5

['Rule 1 - Off Topic', 'Rule 2 - No support questions/rants/bug-reports', 'Rule 3 - Images/videos in self-posts', 'Rule 4 - No self-promotional spamming', 'Rule 5 - No reposts or blog-spam/rehosted content', 'Rule 6 - No editorializing titles', 'Rule 7 - No piracy', 'Rule 8 - No unauthorized polls, bots or giveaways.', 'Rule 9 - No offensive or low-effort comments.', 'Rule 10 - No affiliate links']

it's not the ' it's the ''

space

d76rjv4

t3_50r7vx

t1_d76qr9n

It’s not the first derivative of distance with respect to time that gets you, it’s the second.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Submissions must be related to Space/Cosmology', 'No sensationalist/misleading/unscientific content or titles', 'No spam/blogspam/paywalled/pirated content', 'No petitions/surveys/crowdfunding', 'No social media links', 'No duplicate or re-hosted content', 'Images are only allowed on Sunday UTC', 'No low-effort or meme images are permitted at any time.', 'If an image is not OC you must give credit to the original photographer.', 'No low-effort/meme/joke/troll/insult comments', 'No unscientific or anti-scientific comments', 'Straightforward questions belong in the Space Questions Thread', 'Please limit yourself to no more than 5 submissions per 24 hour period.', 'No AI generated content'] ### Context: It’s not the first derivative of distance with respect to time that gets you, it’s the second. ### Text: it's not the ' it's the ''

['Submissions must be related to Space/Cosmology', 'No sensationalist/misleading/unscientific content or titles', 'No spam/blogspam/paywalled/pirated content', 'No petitions/surveys/crowdfunding', 'No social media links', 'No duplicate or re-hosted content', 'Images are only allowed on Sunday UTC', 'No low-effort or meme images are permitted at any time.', 'If an image is not OC you must give credit to the original photographer.', 'No low-effort/meme/joke/troll/insult comments', 'No unscientific or anti-scientific comments', 'Straightforward questions belong in the Space Questions Thread', 'Please limit yourself to no more than 5 submissions per 24 hour period.', 'No AI generated content']

They do say exercise is great for mood, right? Whatever novel you're from!

hillaryclinton

dane5gw

t3_5ft8mw

t1_dandr4u

Ah, like twilight glittery vampires. Glad they took up cycling, should help their sullen disposition 😆.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['R1: Trolling', 'R2: Offensive Content', 'R3: Personal Attack', 'R4: Meta posts', 'R5: Old News (older than 30 days)', 'R6: No Campaigning or Soliciting for 2020 candidates', 'R7: No Negativity Or Rehashing', 'R8: Misleading Content / Bad Source', 'R9: Civility', 'R10: Spam or Comment Spam'] ### Context: Ah, like twilight glittery vampires. Glad they took up cycling, should help their sullen disposition 😆. ### Text: They do say exercise is great for mood, right? Whatever novel you're from!

['R1: Trolling', 'R2: Offensive Content', 'R3: Personal Attack', 'R4: Meta posts', 'R5: Old News (older than 30 days)', 'R6: No Campaigning or Soliciting for 2020 candidates', 'R7: No Negativity Or Rehashing', 'R8: Misleading Content / Bad Source', 'R9: Civility', 'R10: Spam or Comment Spam']

Sad. Go back where you came from, along with those pesky Aboriginals. Alternatively, maybe we can work out some residential schooling program to make sure your identity is Core Canada.

CanadaPolitics

dc00d7f

t3_5lzo95

t1_dbzyryw

Tbh I listened to a few tracks from the Hips and my under appreciation of their art leads me to believe that I'm unworthy of being canadianized.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Rule 1 - Edited headline', 'Rule 2 - Not respectful', 'Rule 3 - Not substantive', 'Rule 4 - Direct advocacy', 'Rule 5 - Not Canadian / not recent', 'Rule 6 - Duplicate', 'Rule 7 - Reply to removal', 'Rule 8 - Downvoting', 'Rule 9 - Copy/paste'] ### Context: Tbh I listened to a few tracks from the Hips and my under appreciation of their art leads me to believe that I'm unworthy of being canadianized. ### Text: Sad. Go back where you came from, along with those pesky Aboriginals. Alternatively, maybe we can work out some residential schooling program to make sure your identity is Core Canada.

['Rule 1 - Edited headline', 'Rule 2 - Not respectful', 'Rule 3 - Not substantive', 'Rule 4 - Direct advocacy', 'Rule 5 - Not Canadian / not recent', 'Rule 6 - Duplicate', 'Rule 7 - Reply to removal', 'Rule 8 - Downvoting', 'Rule 9 - Copy/paste']

this is really cool actually! so he's like a swarm thing?

Overwatch

d5j7n3k

t3_4soibx

t1_d5gcqld

One of the theories is that Reaper is basically a cloud of nanomachines. Explains how he can teleport, go into wraith form, generate whole shotguns from thin air, and absorbs "souls" (really just the nanomachines cannibalizing the materials)

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Must be relevant to Overwatch.', 'Titles must be clear and accurate. No spoilers in titles.', 'No low-quality, low-effort, or repetitive content.', 'No NSFW/NSFL content.', 'Be civil. No personal attacks or hateful speech.', 'Terms of Service Violations', 'No Witchhunting or Cheating Accusations.', 'Site Violations', 'Use Correct Flair.'] ### Context: One of the theories is that Reaper is basically a cloud of nanomachines. Explains how he can teleport, go into wraith form, generate whole shotguns from thin air, and absorbs "souls" (really just the nanomachines cannibalizing the materials) ### Text: this is really cool actually! so he's like a swarm thing?

['Must be relevant to Overwatch.', 'Titles must be clear and accurate. No spoilers in titles.', 'No low-quality, low-effort, or repetitive content.', 'No NSFW/NSFL content.', 'Be civil. No personal attacks or hateful speech.', 'Terms of Service Violations', 'No Witchhunting or Cheating Accusations.', 'Site Violations', 'Use Correct Flair.']

Smooth as a Lannister:)

photoshopbattles

d72l2lk

t3_50aqk9

t1_d72ir3o

[Beware of Dinklage](http://i.imgur.com/i461Lqb.jpg) &amp; [Animated with SOUND](http://loopnroll.com/p/2G3tI)

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Subjective Title', 'Request', 'Bad Link', 'Image Content', 'Submission Deleted', 'NSFW', 'Junk / Off Topic', 'Top Level Comment Without Original Photoshop', 'Missing Title Prefix'] ### Context: [Beware of Dinklage](http://i.imgur.com/i461Lqb.jpg) &amp; [Animated with SOUND](http://loopnroll.com/p/2G3tI) ### Text: Smooth as a Lannister:)

['Subjective Title', 'Request', 'Bad Link', 'Image Content', 'Submission Deleted', 'NSFW', 'Junk / Off Topic', 'Top Level Comment Without Original Photoshop', 'Missing Title Prefix']

EXACTLY! Or even less sinister: How many times have physicists come forward and said "Whelp, we're almost wrapped up, give us a few more years and there won't be any reason to teach physics anymore." Apparently they've been saying that regularly since Newton's day.

OutOfTheLoop

d8pd9u4

t3_57422w

t1_d8pcyl7

Yes. But I kind of understand the reasoning he's posting about. How many times have scientists mislead the general public for personal gain? How many times have we seen posts here about scientific "miracles" that on further examination turn out to be over blown or misstated? In some ways for some people science is just as bad as religion. Poorly understood and taken on faith alone.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Post title must be a current, unbiased, and coherent question', 'Text body must include context', 'Recently asked - already on the frontpage (search)', 'Top-level comment must answer or ask a follow-up', 'Uncivil', 'Not a loop - better suited for another subreddit', 'No AI Answers'] ### Context: Yes. But I kind of understand the reasoning he's posting about. How many times have scientists mislead the general public for personal gain? How many times have we seen posts here about scientific "miracles" that on further examination turn out to be over blown or misstated? In some ways for some people science is just as bad as religion. Poorly understood and taken on faith alone. ### Text: EXACTLY! Or even less sinister: How many times have physicists come forward and said "Whelp, we're almost wrapped up, give us a few more years and there won't be any reason to teach physics anymore." Apparently they've been saying that regularly since Newton's day.

['Post title must be a current, unbiased, and coherent question', 'Text body must include context', 'Recently asked - already on the frontpage (search)', 'Top-level comment must answer or ask a follow-up', 'Uncivil', 'Not a loop - better suited for another subreddit', 'No AI Answers']

You're insane

NeutralPolitics

d6zog4m

t3_4xifoq

t1_d6gq9ou

If by 'neutral,' you mean 'accurate,' then the NYT and the Washington Post are the best sources. You'll have to separate the reporting from the columnists, of course. Politico.com also does good, balanced work.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Comment Rule 1: Be courteous.', 'Comment Rule 2: Source your facts.', 'Comment Rule 3: Be substantive.', 'Comment Rule 4: Address the arguments, not the person.', 'Submission Rule A: Ask a specific political question.', 'Submission Rule B: Frame it in a neutral way.', 'Submission Rule C: Outline issue well.', 'Submission Rule D: Provide sources.', 'Submission Rule E: Propose a good starting point for discussion.', 'Submission Rule F: Title the post accurately.', 'Submission Rule G: No requests for speculation.'] ### Context: If by 'neutral,' you mean 'accurate,' then the NYT and the Washington Post are the best sources. You'll have to separate the reporting from the columnists, of course. Politico.com also does good, balanced work. ### Text: You're insane

['Comment Rule 1: Be courteous.', 'Comment Rule 2: Source your facts.', 'Comment Rule 3: Be substantive.', 'Comment Rule 4: Address the arguments, not the person.', 'Submission Rule A: Ask a specific political question.', 'Submission Rule B: Frame it in a neutral way.', 'Submission Rule C: Outline issue well.', 'Submission Rule D: Provide sources.', 'Submission Rule E: Propose a good starting point for discussion.', 'Submission Rule F: Title the post accurately.', 'Submission Rule G: No requests for speculation.']

Entering my sophomore year at Penn, currently doing RA work for a biochemist at a major company in the Midwest, the name of which I won't drop because it will be very easy to find out my name. My "hard drug" use is psychedelics once or twice a month. I have fine grades and extensive lab work and are looking to pursue a career in oral surgery. As I stated in the post I'm also a nationally ranked rower. But you're right, drugs are my only purpose in life. Fuck me I guess

sex

d66vsoe

t3_4wg6n5

t1_d66vjj9

[deleted]

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['ENGAGE CONSTRUCTIVELY AT ALL TIMES', 'READ THE FAQ & FORUM RULES BEFORE POSTING/COMMENTING', 'CHECK PAST POSTS BEFORE POSTING A COMMON TOPIC', 'ALL CONTRIBUTIONS MUST BE SEX POSITIVE', 'POSTS SEEK ADVICE, COMMENTS PROVIDE IT', 'DO NOT TROLL OR ENGAGE WITH TROLLS HERE', 'NO DM REQUESTS/OFFERS', 'DO NOT POST RESTRICTED CONTENT OR RE-POST REMOVED POSTS', 'BAN EVASION'] ### Context: [deleted] ### Text: Entering my sophomore year at Penn, currently doing RA work for a biochemist at a major company in the Midwest, the name of which I won't drop because it will be very easy to find out my name. My "hard drug" use is psychedelics once or twice a month. I have fine grades and extensive lab work and are looking to pursue a career in oral surgery. As I stated in the post I'm also a nationally ranked rower. But you're right, drugs are my only purpose in life. Fuck me I guess

['ENGAGE CONSTRUCTIVELY AT ALL TIMES', 'READ THE FAQ & FORUM RULES BEFORE POSTING/COMMENTING', 'CHECK PAST POSTS BEFORE POSTING A COMMON TOPIC', 'ALL CONTRIBUTIONS MUST BE SEX POSITIVE', 'POSTS SEEK ADVICE, COMMENTS PROVIDE IT', 'DO NOT TROLL OR ENGAGE WITH TROLLS HERE', 'NO DM REQUESTS/OFFERS', 'DO NOT POST RESTRICTED CONTENT OR RE-POST REMOVED POSTS', 'BAN EVASION']

theres an app on the ps4 for the voice chat?

Overwatch

dakpw16

t3_5fjs3j

t1_dakpsy6

Sometimes I'll be playing then voice shuts off mid game without notifying me. I just restart the app :(

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Must be relevant to Overwatch.', 'Titles must be clear and accurate. No spoilers in titles.', 'No low-quality, low-effort, or repetitive content.', 'No NSFW/NSFL content.', 'Be civil. No personal attacks or hateful speech.', 'Terms of Service Violations', 'No Witchhunting or Cheating Accusations.', 'Site Violations', 'Use Correct Flair.'] ### Context: Sometimes I'll be playing then voice shuts off mid game without notifying me. I just restart the app :( ### Text: theres an app on the ps4 for the voice chat?

['Must be relevant to Overwatch.', 'Titles must be clear and accurate. No spoilers in titles.', 'No low-quality, low-effort, or repetitive content.', 'No NSFW/NSFL content.', 'Be civil. No personal attacks or hateful speech.', 'Terms of Service Violations', 'No Witchhunting or Cheating Accusations.', 'Site Violations', 'Use Correct Flair.']

1/9 2/18 3/27 All three of those equals 1/9. Make sense?

food

d7dtess

t3_51m9ma

t1_d7dt4g0

Gotcha. This makes sense. I believe I make well above 9 more posts/comments to every link post I make. And when you say, "you post a link post to your channel. You then must make 9 comments before posting another link, comment with a link or embedding a link." Does this mean I can't post a link to an article or video elsewhere that I enjoy and want to share or just a link to my channel? I really do appreciate you walking me through this. Not trying to spam anybody. Just like sharing my food. I don't even monetize my videos, just enjoy sharing recipes and having conversations about them. It makes my day!

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Original Images only (OC Only)', "Titles May Only Contain the Food's Name", 'Add a [Tag] into Your Title', 'No Low-Quality Posts or Comments', 'Be Nice', 'No Abusive Circlejerks', 'Spam/NSFW Gif or Image Comment', 'Blog/Website Linking'] ### Context: Gotcha. This makes sense. I believe I make well above 9 more posts/comments to every link post I make. And when you say, "you post a link post to your channel. You then must make 9 comments before posting another link, comment with a link or embedding a link." Does this mean I can't post a link to an article or video elsewhere that I enjoy and want to share or just a link to my channel? I really do appreciate you walking me through this. Not trying to spam anybody. Just like sharing my food. I don't even monetize my videos, just enjoy sharing recipes and having conversations about them. It makes my day! ### Text: 1/9 2/18 3/27 All three of those equals 1/9. Make sense?

['Original Images only (OC Only)', "Titles May Only Contain the Food's Name", 'Add a [Tag] into Your Title', 'No Low-Quality Posts or Comments', 'Be Nice', 'No Abusive Circlejerks', 'Spam/NSFW Gif or Image Comment', 'Blog/Website Linking']

In terms of actual power CoS is above SoS, but SoS has a huge amount of international influence as chief diplomat.

PoliticalDiscussion

da3fp1x

t3_5d9u8f

t1_da3eqku

CoS is more powerful right? But SoS seems to provide a better stepping stone to more powerful positions

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Keep it Civil.', 'Meta', 'Low investment', 'Submissions should be an impartial discussion prompt + questions.', 'Provide some background and context. Offer substantive avenues for discussion.', 'Everything in the post should be directly related to a political issue.', 'Formatting and housekeeping things:'] ### Context: CoS is more powerful right? But SoS seems to provide a better stepping stone to more powerful positions ### Text: In terms of actual power CoS is above SoS, but SoS has a huge amount of international influence as chief diplomat.

['Keep it Civil.', 'Meta', 'Low investment', 'Submissions should be an impartial discussion prompt + questions.', 'Provide some background and context. Offer substantive avenues for discussion.', 'Everything in the post should be directly related to a political issue.', 'Formatting and housekeeping things:']

> Half the people that act outraged by things like this are 100% hypocrites and check their phone etc while driving just like everyone else. What is it now, half the people or everyone else? In any case, you're clearly projecting here. Just because you're an irresponsible cunt, doesn't mean everyone else is.

pokemongo

d6wa3zt

t3_4zhzzf

t1_d6w64ld

Came here to laugh at the outraged idiots crying about how this is a travesty of safety and how appalled they are. Was pleasantly surprised at the lack of rage. Good on you subreddit for not being ridiculous. Half the people that act outraged by things like this are 100% hypocrites and check their phone etc while driving just like everyone else.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ["Be civil. Don't insult or attack each other, or share nsfw content.", 'All posts must be DIRECTLY related to POGO. Feedback for the subreddit should be in modmail', 'Do not post or advocate for cheating. We follow Niantics TOS in this sub.', 'Marketing', "Please don't post image macros (memes) w/o PoGo assets", 'Please use megathreads when available', "Please don't sell or trade", 'Trainer codes should not be shared here. Use the affiliated discord or relevant subreddit.'] ### Context: Came here to laugh at the outraged idiots crying about how this is a travesty of safety and how appalled they are. Was pleasantly surprised at the lack of rage. Good on you subreddit for not being ridiculous. Half the people that act outraged by things like this are 100% hypocrites and check their phone etc while driving just like everyone else. ### Text: > Half the people that act outraged by things like this are 100% hypocrites and check their phone etc while driving just like everyone else. What is it now, half the people or everyone else? In any case, you're clearly projecting here. Just because you're an irresponsible cunt, doesn't mean everyone else is.

["Be civil. Don't insult or attack each other, or share nsfw content.", 'All posts must be DIRECTLY related to POGO. Feedback for the subreddit should be in modmail', 'Do not post or advocate for cheating. We follow Niantics TOS in this sub.', 'Marketing', "Please don't post image macros (memes) w/o PoGo assets", 'Please use megathreads when available', "Please don't sell or trade", 'Trainer codes should not be shared here. Use the affiliated discord or relevant subreddit.']

Yes. There's no way you're going to liquify the Helium or keep it liquid. The subcooled oxygen is way too warm for that.

spacex

d8qmivg

t3_57balr

t1_d8ql9uw

It's still gas-phase in the tank right? Too busy right now to look up the phase diagram of helium.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Does it promote a healthy community and a civil discussion on the substance of the issue?', 'Is the post directly related to SpaceX? Is the comment on-topic?', 'Does the post contribute meaningful new information or questions to the community?', 'Does the post contribute to a serious, thoughtful and technically-oriented discussion?', "Do comments in a 'Technical' flair thread contribute to a serious and thoughtful discussion?", "Does the post have a good title, a clean link and the right format, and doesn't belong in a thread?"] ### Context: It's still gas-phase in the tank right? Too busy right now to look up the phase diagram of helium. ### Text: Yes. There's no way you're going to liquify the Helium or keep it liquid. The subcooled oxygen is way too warm for that.

['Does it promote a healthy community and a civil discussion on the substance of the issue?', 'Is the post directly related to SpaceX? Is the comment on-topic?', 'Does the post contribute meaningful new information or questions to the community?', 'Does the post contribute to a serious, thoughtful and technically-oriented discussion?', "Do comments in a 'Technical' flair thread contribute to a serious and thoughtful discussion?", "Does the post have a good title, a clean link and the right format, and doesn't belong in a thread?"]

/r/nba and reddit in general loves to be controversial for the hell of it. A lot of Warrior dickriders in here.

nba

da8b9od

t3_5duhvj

t1_da7nhab

Or the rest of /r nba

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Be civil and respectful', 'No trolling or baiting users', 'No racist, sexist, or homophobic language', 'No reposts', 'No fake news', 'No self-promotion', 'No NSFW content', 'Posts and comments must be relevant to the NBA', 'Stats/Player Tweets/Quotes/Misc. Media are self-post only and must be sourced'] ### Context: Or the rest of /r nba ### Text: /r/nba and reddit in general loves to be controversial for the hell of it. A lot of Warrior dickriders in here.

['Be civil and respectful', 'No trolling or baiting users', 'No racist, sexist, or homophobic language', 'No reposts', 'No fake news', 'No self-promotion', 'No NSFW content', 'Posts and comments must be relevant to the NBA', 'Stats/Player Tweets/Quotes/Misc. Media are self-post only and must be sourced']

It has been asked at least 10 times

jailbreak

da2n1zq

t3_5d8p0x

t1_da2m1qm

I check this sub Reddit daily, haven't seen it.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No Piracy/Trademark Violations', 'Theming-related posts belong in r/iOSthemes', 'No misleading/all-caps titles. Titles must contain at least three words and include a Flair.', 'No exceptionally low-effort posts', 'No posts or comments about Bypassing Passcodes or other Device Locks/Restrictions', 'Do not buy/sell devices or ask for money', "Be civil and friendly. Don't be excessively uncivil, rude, insulting, etc.", 'Topic must be jailbreak-related', 'Please read the FAQ, read the sidebar, and search before posting', 'Avoid fueling excessive drama'] ### Context: I check this sub Reddit daily, haven't seen it. ### Text: It has been asked at least 10 times

['No Piracy/Trademark Violations', 'Theming-related posts belong in r/iOSthemes', 'No misleading/all-caps titles. Titles must contain at least three words and include a Flair.', 'No exceptionally low-effort posts', 'No posts or comments about Bypassing Passcodes or other Device Locks/Restrictions', 'Do not buy/sell devices or ask for money', "Be civil and friendly. Don't be excessively uncivil, rude, insulting, etc.", 'Topic must be jailbreak-related', 'Please read the FAQ, read the sidebar, and search before posting', 'Avoid fueling excessive drama']

Just like when he cowered away from the BLM protestors right? http://static.seattletimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/e0fc6412-3e27-11e5-a580-5d86ec2e3b6f-780x465.jpg

SandersForPresident

d3ptctn

t3_4lsiwf

t1_d3pt4he

Compare this video with the one of Trump practically shitting his pants on stage. Only one acted like a leader.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Be respectful', 'Advance progressive candidates and policies', 'Stay on topic', 'Write good post titles', 'Repost', 'Unauthorized Solicitation', 'Inaccurate', "Reddit's Global Rules", 'Social media must be screenshots.', 'No drama'] ### Context: Compare this video with the one of Trump practically shitting his pants on stage. Only one acted like a leader. ### Text: Just like when he cowered away from the BLM protestors right? http://static.seattletimes.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/e0fc6412-3e27-11e5-a580-5d86ec2e3b6f-780x465.jpg

['Be respectful', 'Advance progressive candidates and policies', 'Stay on topic', 'Write good post titles', 'Repost', 'Unauthorized Solicitation', 'Inaccurate', "Reddit's Global Rules", 'Social media must be screenshots.', 'No drama']

hmm ok.. let's look at this guy's post history, [**oh.. why am i not surprised?**](https://www.reddit.com/r/europeannationalism/comments/4j2r4x/lol_fuck_you_losers_you_cucks_got_quarantined/d337p3z?context=3)

OldSchoolCool

d876up4

t3_551y2o

t1_d875h4u

Nice try to make the Zionist war criminals look all cuddly and friendly, as if they're *"normal people, just like us!"* and not the monsters of the 20th century Middle East like they really are

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Rule 1 – Must be 25 years old or more', 'Rule 2 – Must have year or decade in the title', 'Rule 3 – No offensive comments, offensive submissions or repost spam', "Rule 4 – Don't mention death of relative in title", 'Rule 5 – No reposts less than 6 months old', 'Rule 6 – Must feature a person', 'Rule 7. No publicity photos of celebrities - (photos of celebs living life are fine)', 'Rule 8 - No TV clips, movie clips or stills ( videos of live performances + home video are fine)'] ### Context: Nice try to make the Zionist war criminals look all cuddly and friendly, as if they're *"normal people, just like us!"* and not the monsters of the 20th century Middle East like they really are ### Text: hmm ok.. let's look at this guy's post history, [**oh.. why am i not surprised?**](https://www.reddit.com/r/europeannationalism/comments/4j2r4x/lol_fuck_you_losers_you_cucks_got_quarantined/d337p3z?context=3)

['Rule 1 – Must be 25 years old or more', 'Rule 2 – Must have year or decade in the title', 'Rule 3 – No offensive comments, offensive submissions or repost spam', "Rule 4 – Don't mention death of relative in title", 'Rule 5 – No reposts less than 6 months old', 'Rule 6 – Must feature a person', 'Rule 7. No publicity photos of celebrities - (photos of celebs living life are fine)', 'Rule 8 - No TV clips, movie clips or stills ( videos of live performances + home video are fine)']

Um, welcome to the way of the world I suppose. There are programs in most of the developed world to look after people and provide for them, which makes thin a way better than they used to be actually. But yeah, you have to provide something of value - skill, service or chattel - in exchange for something else of value. If you want something, you have to provide something. This doesn't suck, this is awesome. This means that you can get things you can't make yourself. I can't make an iPhone or an air conditioner or a refrigerator, but I can fix animals. In exchange for fixing animals I get currency to exchange for shit I need and want. How do you propose this system change? I mean, seems to be working out for most of us.

depression

d9m72j8

t3_5b4f5y

t1_d9m6dpc

That's my point. Food and shelter have become a privilege and not a human right and that's so fucked up that we as a society have come to accept that as normal -_-

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Posts must request personal support for depressive disorders in yourself, or someone close to you', 'All replies must be personal, empathetic, and responsive to OP. No tough love or debate.', 'Offer help ONLY via public comments. No "I\'m here to help" posts or PM/chat requests', 'No low-content posts or responses', "Don't role-model or act as an authority. No achievement/advice posts or AMAs", 'No general uplifting content of any kind, including "it gets better" or other unkeepable promises', 'Do not give or request clinical advice or advocate for or against treatments & self-help strategies', 'NO methods for any type of self-harm, or validating self-destructive intent', "Don't encourage rule-breaking or off-topic content", 'No activism, debate or unapproved surveys including casual or general questions and polls', 'Absolutely no self-promotion of any kind, including creative writing or other arts', 'Do not request or offer money, goods, or services'] ### Context: That's my point. Food and shelter have become a privilege and not a human right and that's so fucked up that we as a society have come to accept that as normal -_- ### Text: Um, welcome to the way of the world I suppose. There are programs in most of the developed world to look after people and provide for them, which makes thin a way better than they used to be actually. But yeah, you have to provide something of value - skill, service or chattel - in exchange for something else of value. If you want something, you have to provide something. This doesn't suck, this is awesome. This means that you can get things you can't make yourself. I can't make an iPhone or an air conditioner or a refrigerator, but I can fix animals. In exchange for fixing animals I get currency to exchange for shit I need and want. How do you propose this system change? I mean, seems to be working out for most of us.

['Posts must request personal support for depressive disorders in yourself, or someone close to you', 'All replies must be personal, empathetic, and responsive to OP. No tough love or debate.', 'Offer help ONLY via public comments. No "I\'m here to help" posts or PM/chat requests', 'No low-content posts or responses', "Don't role-model or act as an authority. No achievement/advice posts or AMAs", 'No general uplifting content of any kind, including "it gets better" or other unkeepable promises', 'Do not give or request clinical advice or advocate for or against treatments & self-help strategies', 'NO methods for any type of self-harm, or validating self-destructive intent', "Don't encourage rule-breaking or off-topic content", 'No activism, debate or unapproved surveys including casual or general questions and polls', 'Absolutely no self-promotion of any kind, including creative writing or other arts', 'Do not request or offer money, goods, or services']

have 5 people left in game, do the glitch.

2007scape

d86yomv

t3_552eyq

t1_d86yio3

Give me an example

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Body of submission must be related to OSRS', 'Do not break Jagex/OSRS rules', 'No flaming/trolling - keep things civil!', 'No "Advice Animals" or other image macros', 'No posts asking for items/money', 'No accusing players of wrongdoing', "Don't post your streams", 'No mute/ban appeals'] ### Context: Give me an example ### Text: have 5 people left in game, do the glitch.

['Body of submission must be related to OSRS', 'Do not break Jagex/OSRS rules', 'No flaming/trolling - keep things civil!', 'No "Advice Animals" or other image macros', 'No posts asking for items/money', 'No accusing players of wrongdoing', "Don't post your streams", 'No mute/ban appeals']

It is just ridiculous because the people of WV keep supporting these yahoos. Instead of our government finding ways to create new jobs and revenue, they spend all their resources trying to keep coal alive. None of the politicians plan to do anything with the increasing number of kids leaving the state in search of better opportunities elsewhere. And to your point of the first session, i am pretty sure the first meeting involved roll call, a happy birthday song, and that was it. It is just ridiculous. To show you how stupid politics in WV is, the District 4 Rep Mitch Carmichael didn't even win his home county, not even close, yet still gets voted in. Just craziness.

politics

d8xk59h

t3_5845qw

t1_d8xgctp

Jeff Kessler was the better choice. Instead we got zero political experience coal country Trump running as a "Democrat" and 3 years of state legislative experience used car salesman Bill "Patriot" Cole. The first debate was a sad joke, the moderator was the only one that came out looking good from it. I'll be voting for the mountain party candidate, Charlotte Pritt, as she seems like the only one that even kind of looks gubernatorial and viable as a candidate. Not all is dark in WV politics though. Doug Reynolds is running an exceptional campaign for attorney general against Patrick Morrisey. Although it shouldn't be hard to run a campaign against Morrisey since he only got his law license in WV 3 days before filing to run for AG last time around after moving here from NJ after he failed to get elected to offices there. And his wife is a drug company lobbyist for companies that make pain pills that are wreaking havoc on the southern half of the state and he doesn't seem to want to do anything about it. The other big bright spot in WV politics is in the legislature. After the Republicans played politics for the whole session and refused to pass a budget and instead worked on passing constitutional carry, repealing right to work and prevailing wage, and repealing the ban on raw milk, as well as a failed attempt at a religious freedom bill. Instead they forced the governor to call a special session that lasted 17 days at the cost of $35,000 a day. And with this budget, they raided the states rainy day fund because some Republican obstructionists refused to raise taxes even one penny. Then in late June, the rains did come, and the state didn't have money in the budget to handle that. So a second special session had to be held to find money to fix schools and roads that were destroyed by flooding. With all of this in mind, there is a large swath of the electorate that is very upset with the Republican leadership in the house and the Senate. Which should result in at least the Senate changing hands and possibly the house too. (Typed this up on my phone, so please forgive the errors. I'm going to come back later on my desktop and clean it up and add some sources and videos)

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['General: No novelty accounts or bots', 'General: Rule-breaking username', 'General: No spam or solicitation', 'Comments: No incivility or personal attacks towards users', 'Comments: No flaming, baiting, or trolling', 'Comments: No witch hunts or personal information', 'Comments: Follow AMA specific rules', 'Posts: Submissions must be explicitly about US politics', 'Posts: Submissions must be published within the last 7 days', 'Posts: Submissions must be from the Approved Domain List', 'Posts: Titles must be the exact headline from the article.', 'Posts: Do not flood the new queue', 'Posts: No copy-pasted submissions or non-English articles', 'Posts: Disallowed submission types', 'Posts: Disclose employment or affiliation with a source'] ### Context: Jeff Kessler was the better choice. Instead we got zero political experience coal country Trump running as a "Democrat" and 3 years of state legislative experience used car salesman Bill "Patriot" Cole. The first debate was a sad joke, the moderator was the only one that came out looking good from it. I'll be voting for the mountain party candidate, Charlotte Pritt, as she seems like the only one that even kind of looks gubernatorial and viable as a candidate. Not all is dark in WV politics though. Doug Reynolds is running an exceptional campaign for attorney general against Patrick Morrisey. Although it shouldn't be hard to run a campaign against Morrisey since he only got his law license in WV 3 days before filing to run for AG last time around after moving here from NJ after he failed to get elected to offices there. And his wife is a drug company lobbyist for companies that make pain pills that are wreaking havoc on the southern half of the state and he doesn't seem to want to do anything about it. The other big bright spot in WV politics is in the legislature. After the Republicans played politics for the whole session and refused to pass a budget and instead worked on passing constitutional carry, repealing right to work and prevailing wage, and repealing the ban on raw milk, as well as a failed attempt at a religious freedom bill. Instead they forced the governor to call a special session that lasted 17 days at the cost of $35,000 a day. And with this budget, they raided the states rainy day fund because some Republican obstructionists refused to raise taxes even one penny. Then in late June, the rains did come, and the state didn't have money in the budget to handle that. So a second special session had to be held to find money to fix schools and roads that were destroyed by flooding. With all of this in mind, there is a large swath of the electorate that is very upset with the Republican leadership in the house and the Senate. Which should result in at least the Senate changing hands and possibly the house too. (Typed this up on my phone, so please forgive the errors. I'm going to come back later on my desktop and clean it up and add some sources and videos) ### Text: It is just ridiculous because the people of WV keep supporting these yahoos. Instead of our government finding ways to create new jobs and revenue, they spend all their resources trying to keep coal alive. None of the politicians plan to do anything with the increasing number of kids leaving the state in search of better opportunities elsewhere. And to your point of the first session, i am pretty sure the first meeting involved roll call, a happy birthday song, and that was it. It is just ridiculous. To show you how stupid politics in WV is, the District 4 Rep Mitch Carmichael didn't even win his home county, not even close, yet still gets voted in. Just craziness.

['General: No novelty accounts or bots', 'General: Rule-breaking username', 'General: No spam or solicitation', 'Comments: No incivility or personal attacks towards users', 'Comments: No flaming, baiting, or trolling', 'Comments: No witch hunts or personal information', 'Comments: Follow AMA specific rules', 'Posts: Submissions must be explicitly about US politics', 'Posts: Submissions must be published within the last 7 days', 'Posts: Submissions must be from the Approved Domain List', 'Posts: Titles must be the exact headline from the article.', 'Posts: Do not flood the new queue', 'Posts: No copy-pasted submissions or non-English articles', 'Posts: Disallowed submission types', 'Posts: Disclose employment or affiliation with a source']

Are you 8?

aww

d5gcpdb

t3_4tciia

t1_d5gc5az

Honestly, I want to see an after picture in 6 months. See if all the Pokemon Go is actually doing some good.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No "sad" content', 'No captioned pictures/videos', 'No asking for interaction (asking for upvotes, names, etc)', 'No harassment', 'Posts must link to sites on our approved list', 'No NSFW content', 'No asking for donations or adoptions', 'No bots, bot-like behaviour, or spam', 'Original content only', 'No social media', "We're here to help, but please provide a link/URL when you modmail us"] ### Context: Honestly, I want to see an after picture in 6 months. See if all the Pokemon Go is actually doing some good. ### Text: Are you 8?

['No "sad" content', 'No captioned pictures/videos', 'No asking for interaction (asking for upvotes, names, etc)', 'No harassment', 'Posts must link to sites on our approved list', 'No NSFW content', 'No asking for donations or adoptions', 'No bots, bot-like behaviour, or spam', 'Original content only', 'No social media', "We're here to help, but please provide a link/URL when you modmail us"]

Exactly. It was funny. If it had been a guy who said: "Hey, I get 'refined' at bars every weekend!" it would've been upvotes all around.

movies

d3paobb

t3_4lpdmw

t1_d3paamd

she made a funny joke and didn't deserve to be chastised is the point really

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Do Familiarize Yourself With Our Rules.', 'No Antagonism/Flamewars/Trolling - No Racial/Sexist/Dogwhistling/Homophobic Slurs', 'No Spam & Self-promotion - Same Source Posts', 'No Image Posts & Memes', 'No Ambiguous/Misleading/Inaccurate Information or Clickbait in The Submission Title', 'No Extraneous Comic Book Movie Submissions', 'No Repost or Discussion Threads of New Releases', 'No Spoilers', 'No Encouraging Piracy', 'No Subreddit Brigading', 'Prohibited Popular Websites', 'No AI generated content', "OP's question is easily googlable or otherwise over-discussed in /r/movies"] ### Context: she made a funny joke and didn't deserve to be chastised is the point really ### Text: Exactly. It was funny. If it had been a guy who said: "Hey, I get 'refined' at bars every weekend!" it would've been upvotes all around.

['Do Familiarize Yourself With Our Rules.', 'No Antagonism/Flamewars/Trolling - No Racial/Sexist/Dogwhistling/Homophobic Slurs', 'No Spam & Self-promotion - Same Source Posts', 'No Image Posts & Memes', 'No Ambiguous/Misleading/Inaccurate Information or Clickbait in The Submission Title', 'No Extraneous Comic Book Movie Submissions', 'No Repost or Discussion Threads of New Releases', 'No Spoilers', 'No Encouraging Piracy', 'No Subreddit Brigading', 'Prohibited Popular Websites', 'No AI generated content', "OP's question is easily googlable or otherwise over-discussed in /r/movies"]

I'm the only person that trades successfully in my league. I think what most people fear is embarrassment or the "I shouldn't have let him go!" moment. For me, a good trade formula is this: -Establish where you need help. Don't trust trade a good receiver because you want another good receiver. -Find a player you want to target, but NOT a player someone won't trade. I'm sorry, but it's impossible to get a first or second rounder who's producing. -Once you find that player, figure out what their team needs and OFFER it to them. If that means you have to give up a good receiver to get a great running back, and that's valuable to you, do it. People will be a lot more willing to trade or make counter offers or have reasonable discussions if you give them a nice offer the first time. -Prepare to sacrifice another player that you are replacing on a waiver wire to make the trade work. Sometimes that one great player is worth two of your good ones. Make sure you have someone else who's available on the wire that you've done your research on and are confident will be yours. Burning a roster spot on two for one trades can hurt in this regard. -I don't know if you can do this on ESPN, but on Yahoo you can evaluate trades. Always make sure that that evaluation shows the person you're trading with getting MORE points than you. Why? because projections can always be vastly misleading and flat out WRONG sometimes. but people want to believe numbers, so make them believe the numbers, that way you can always say: "Come.on man, on paper you are getting the better end of the deal." This will always get you, at the very least, a counter offer to work with. TL;DR: People like to know they're winning, the key to making a good trade is being willing to make the right sacrifices and show the other person that they are winning in some way, shape or form.

fantasyfootball

d8ikae8

t3_56buxm

t1_d8i0kq5

I don't know what trading is like in your league but my league is so anti trade. People will let their rosters just die and give up on the season then trade and try to revive their team. To make it worse everyone who does trade usually values their guys where they took them in the draft. So Dez is having a horrible season but was taken in the second. So a guy in my league wants Jordy Nelson in exchange for Dez and no less. Carlos Hyde taken in the 3rd in our league. No one is going to offer higher than a 3rd rounder for him. Trading in our league almost never happens because no one trades unless they are not just winning on the deal but winning huge on the exchange.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No individual threads of any kind specific to your team or league.', "Don't post standalone Player/Game Discussion threads when a Game or Postgame Thread is active", 'Keep the subreddit on topic and quality up. No memes, irrelevant media or spam.', 'Search or check new before posting', 'Be respectful', 'Avoid posting circlejerk or reaction threads', 'Report content that breaks the rules', 'No posts about referral or premium content', 'No "extreme" bets, wagers, etc', 'Other'] ### Context: I don't know what trading is like in your league but my league is so anti trade. People will let their rosters just die and give up on the season then trade and try to revive their team. To make it worse everyone who does trade usually values their guys where they took them in the draft. So Dez is having a horrible season but was taken in the second. So a guy in my league wants Jordy Nelson in exchange for Dez and no less. Carlos Hyde taken in the 3rd in our league. No one is going to offer higher than a 3rd rounder for him. Trading in our league almost never happens because no one trades unless they are not just winning on the deal but winning huge on the exchange. ### Text: I'm the only person that trades successfully in my league. I think what most people fear is embarrassment or the "I shouldn't have let him go!" moment. For me, a good trade formula is this: -Establish where you need help. Don't trust trade a good receiver because you want another good receiver. -Find a player you want to target, but NOT a player someone won't trade. I'm sorry, but it's impossible to get a first or second rounder who's producing. -Once you find that player, figure out what their team needs and OFFER it to them. If that means you have to give up a good receiver to get a great running back, and that's valuable to you, do it. People will be a lot more willing to trade or make counter offers or have reasonable discussions if you give them a nice offer the first time. -Prepare to sacrifice another player that you are replacing on a waiver wire to make the trade work. Sometimes that one great player is worth two of your good ones. Make sure you have someone else who's available on the wire that you've done your research on and are confident will be yours. Burning a roster spot on two for one trades can hurt in this regard. -I don't know if you can do this on ESPN, but on Yahoo you can evaluate trades. Always make sure that that evaluation shows the person you're trading with getting MORE points than you. Why? because projections can always be vastly misleading and flat out WRONG sometimes. but people want to believe numbers, so make them believe the numbers, that way you can always say: "Come.on man, on paper you are getting the better end of the deal." This will always get you, at the very least, a counter offer to work with. TL;DR: People like to know they're winning, the key to making a good trade is being willing to make the right sacrifices and show the other person that they are winning in some way, shape or form.

['No individual threads of any kind specific to your team or league.', "Don't post standalone Player/Game Discussion threads when a Game or Postgame Thread is active", 'Keep the subreddit on topic and quality up. No memes, irrelevant media or spam.', 'Search or check new before posting', 'Be respectful', 'Avoid posting circlejerk or reaction threads', 'Report content that breaks the rules', 'No posts about referral or premium content', 'No "extreme" bets, wagers, etc', 'Other']

But even if there is a negative stigma about introverted people not having social skills, if someone does have those skills no one in the business world will generally question whether they are introverted or extroverted.

changemyview

dcli3fv

t3_5oltlk

t1_dckbzgc

Good point re: managing small teams. I get the point about introverts not lacking specific traits. But I think it's more about the perception that an introvert may lack these traits.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ["Rule A - Doesn't Explain View", 'Rule B - 3rd Party/Devils Advocate/Soapboxing', 'Rule C - Unclear/Improper Title', 'Rule D - Neutral/Transgender/Harm a specific person/Promo/Meta', 'Rule E - No/Minimal Replies from OP in 3 hours', "Rule 1 - Doesn't Challenge OP (top-level only)", 'Rule 2 - Rude/Hostile Comment', 'Rule 3 - Bad Faith Accusation', 'Rule 4 - Delta Abuse/Misuse or Should Award Delta', "Rule 5 - Doesn't Contribute Meaningfully"] ### Context: Good point re: managing small teams. I get the point about introverts not lacking specific traits. But I think it's more about the perception that an introvert may lack these traits. ### Text: But even if there is a negative stigma about introverted people not having social skills, if someone does have those skills no one in the business world will generally question whether they are introverted or extroverted.

["Rule A - Doesn't Explain View", 'Rule B - 3rd Party/Devils Advocate/Soapboxing', 'Rule C - Unclear/Improper Title', 'Rule D - Neutral/Transgender/Harm a specific person/Promo/Meta', 'Rule E - No/Minimal Replies from OP in 3 hours', "Rule 1 - Doesn't Challenge OP (top-level only)", 'Rule 2 - Rude/Hostile Comment', 'Rule 3 - Bad Faith Accusation', 'Rule 4 - Delta Abuse/Misuse or Should Award Delta', "Rule 5 - Doesn't Contribute Meaningfully"]

Friend ~~zone~~ region

DIY

d6i5htq

t3_4xqy7a

t1_d6hqa7j

awesome. hope she likes it. any reason for using 'F R' on the front cover?

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['All content must be DIY', 'Sitewide Rules', 'Rude or abusive behavior; toxic comments; or harassing others', 'No advertising of any kind is permitted. Such posts will be removed and the offender banned', 'Google First, Reddit Last', 'Low effort posts', 'Sexually suggestive and inappropriate comments', 'Not a post for /r/DIY', 'Searching for products', 'Rating manufacturers and reviewing products', 'Using /r/DIY to promote your social media and social commerce channels'] ### Context: awesome. hope she likes it. any reason for using 'F R' on the front cover? ### Text: Friend ~~zone~~ region

['All content must be DIY', 'Sitewide Rules', 'Rude or abusive behavior; toxic comments; or harassing others', 'No advertising of any kind is permitted. Such posts will be removed and the offender banned', 'Google First, Reddit Last', 'Low effort posts', 'Sexually suggestive and inappropriate comments', 'Not a post for /r/DIY', 'Searching for products', 'Rating manufacturers and reviewing products', 'Using /r/DIY to promote your social media and social commerce channels']

you betcha

gifs

db6nz5d

t3_5i9z68

t1_db6mocs

What a smooth operator, I bet he's getting pussy tonight.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No Reposts or Recent Popular Crossposts', 'No Reaction, HIFW, Analogy, Cakeday, Upvote gifs', 'Better suited to video/Longer than 20 seconds', 'Direct image links REQUIRED', 'No depictions of real-life harassment or assault', 'No witch-hunts or brigading', 'No nudity, porn, gore, or other obscene material allowed.', 'Titles must be descriptive', 'No hate speech of any kind', 'Breaks Reddit rules/redditquette', 'Not animated'] ### Context: What a smooth operator, I bet he's getting pussy tonight. ### Text: you betcha

['No Reposts or Recent Popular Crossposts', 'No Reaction, HIFW, Analogy, Cakeday, Upvote gifs', 'Better suited to video/Longer than 20 seconds', 'Direct image links REQUIRED', 'No depictions of real-life harassment or assault', 'No witch-hunts or brigading', 'No nudity, porn, gore, or other obscene material allowed.', 'Titles must be descriptive', 'No hate speech of any kind', 'Breaks Reddit rules/redditquette', 'Not animated']

When you are wearing them normally sure, but when you are crouching or running it sometimes gets too tight, especially considering people who buy them always seem to be trying to fit into a size too small. Or maybe I'm just too fat to be wearing skinny jeans :(

pics

da8k64a

t3_5dymz5

t1_da8j0w3

Lol I'm wearing some right now and I can assure you my blood flow is unrestricted.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No screenshots, AI images, or pictures in which the focus is a screen.', 'No digital elements or text.', 'No pornography or gore.', 'No doxxing or witch-hunts.', 'Titles must obey all relevant rules.', 'Only approved image-hosts.', 'No GIFs or videos.', 'Remain civil.', 'No progress-pictures.', 'No FCoO or flooding.', 'Reposts are subject to limitations.', 'No self-promotional accounts.'] ### Context: Lol I'm wearing some right now and I can assure you my blood flow is unrestricted. ### Text: When you are wearing them normally sure, but when you are crouching or running it sometimes gets too tight, especially considering people who buy them always seem to be trying to fit into a size too small. Or maybe I'm just too fat to be wearing skinny jeans :(

['No screenshots, AI images, or pictures in which the focus is a screen.', 'No digital elements or text.', 'No pornography or gore.', 'No doxxing or witch-hunts.', 'Titles must obey all relevant rules.', 'Only approved image-hosts.', 'No GIFs or videos.', 'Remain civil.', 'No progress-pictures.', 'No FCoO or flooding.', 'Reposts are subject to limitations.', 'No self-promotional accounts.']

That is not true (at least for the UK). Immigration to the UK is at 633,000. But the UK also has a huge outflow making net migration +327,000 which is still more than here. Also, I'm not entirely sure from the article if this number for Canada includes emigration or not.

canada

d87i1y1

t3_54xu35

t1_d860jwx

Its incredible that France and the U.K. have **double** our population, have a much older population, and still take in less immigrants than Canada.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Editorialized or sensationalized headline / Titres éditorialisés ou sensationnalistes', 'Antagonistic to another person / Hostilité envers autrui', 'No negative generalizations, bigotry, prejudice, hatred / Pas de généralisations négatives, préjugés', "Post doesn't relate to Canada / Contenu sans lien avec le Canada", 'Low content / Contenu à faible teneur', 'Trolling: disrupting normal, on-topic discussion / perturber le cours normal d’une discussion', 'Duplicate or similar post already exists / Doublons ou contenu similaire', 'Flooding r/Canada with articles / Limite de soumission', 'No misinformation spreading'] ### Context: Its incredible that France and the U.K. have **double** our population, have a much older population, and still take in less immigrants than Canada. ### Text: That is not true (at least for the UK). Immigration to the UK is at 633,000. But the UK also has a huge outflow making net migration +327,000 which is still more than here. Also, I'm not entirely sure from the article if this number for Canada includes emigration or not.

['Editorialized or sensationalized headline / Titres éditorialisés ou sensationnalistes', 'Antagonistic to another person / Hostilité envers autrui', 'No negative generalizations, bigotry, prejudice, hatred / Pas de généralisations négatives, préjugés', "Post doesn't relate to Canada / Contenu sans lien avec le Canada", 'Low content / Contenu à faible teneur', 'Trolling: disrupting normal, on-topic discussion / perturber le cours normal d’une discussion', 'Duplicate or similar post already exists / Doublons ou contenu similaire', 'Flooding r/Canada with articles / Limite de soumission', 'No misinformation spreading']

If /lit/ is anything like I remember it, it's a garbage fire whose only contribution to the Internet was egoist memes

LateStageCapitalism

dbb44b5

t3_5isad6

t1_dbasn8l

And /lit/

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Reddit-wide rules apply.', 'Any post that makes a claim should have a RELIABLE source or explanation in the comments by OP', 'No trolling.', 'No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism', 'No imperialism, conservatism, or reactionism.', 'No "lesser evil" rhetoric', 'No bigotry.', 'Be nice to each other.', 'Bans are at moderator discretion.', 'Don’t bother sending us personal promotion requests.', 'Do not post content from Dan Price, any other CEO/business owner or ANY liberal politician/official', 'Do not post NSFL Content and flair NSFW posts accordingly', 'This is not a debate subreddit.', 'Make an effort', 'No AI generated content '] ### Context: And /lit/ ### Text: If /lit/ is anything like I remember it, it's a garbage fire whose only contribution to the Internet was egoist memes

['Reddit-wide rules apply.', 'Any post that makes a claim should have a RELIABLE source or explanation in the comments by OP', 'No trolling.', 'No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism', 'No imperialism, conservatism, or reactionism.', 'No "lesser evil" rhetoric', 'No bigotry.', 'Be nice to each other.', 'Bans are at moderator discretion.', 'Don’t bother sending us personal promotion requests.', 'Do not post content from Dan Price, any other CEO/business owner or ANY liberal politician/official', 'Do not post NSFL Content and flair NSFW posts accordingly', 'This is not a debate subreddit.', 'Make an effort', 'No AI generated content ']

I should be the scumbag who does this. Become Christian and tell women I'm a virgin. Some woman would probably be attracted to it. I'd be a scumbag to marry her into a lie though.

SuicideWatch

d2x517u

t3_4icd2d

t1_d2x4wku

[removed]

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: [] ### Context: [removed] ### Text: I should be the scumbag who does this. Become Christian and tell women I'm a virgin. Some woman would probably be attracted to it. I'd be a scumbag to marry her into a lie though.

[]

You had one more. I got your back.

pcmasterrace

d3xootm

t3_4mq5vi

t1_d3xokv1

I have 5 downvotes. People are jerks.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Harassment/calls to action against others', 'Follow PCMR Etiquette', 'Do not link to outside threads', 'Anonymize all images/screenshots', 'No referral or affiliate links', 'Low quality, unrelated, unoriginal or low-effort posts will be deleted at mod discretion.', 'Do not discriminate against others', 'No begging, trading, selling, or asking for valuation.', 'Do not abuse the NSFW or Spoiler tags', 'Peasantry posts must be self posts', 'Giveaway rules', 'Read our full rules here'] ### Context: I have 5 downvotes. People are jerks. ### Text: You had one more. I got your back.

['Harassment/calls to action against others', 'Follow PCMR Etiquette', 'Do not link to outside threads', 'Anonymize all images/screenshots', 'No referral or affiliate links', 'Low quality, unrelated, unoriginal or low-effort posts will be deleted at mod discretion.', 'Do not discriminate against others', 'No begging, trading, selling, or asking for valuation.', 'Do not abuse the NSFW or Spoiler tags', 'Peasantry posts must be self posts', 'Giveaway rules', 'Read our full rules here']

I'd like to see that, considering how tall Tabu is.

india

dcpql18

t3_5p9h4c

t1_dcpm2ek

And in his final show, he is going to physically tackle Tabu

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['All posts must be specific to India/Indians', 'Submission should only be in English', 'Personal attacks | Abuse | Hate speech', 'Witch-hunting | Personal Information | Meta', 'Original/Relevant Title | Incorrect flair', 'Old content | Reposts', 'TIL | Image Posts | Memes', 'Posts should have reputed source', 'Porn/Gore/NSFW | Self Promotion', 'Generative AI Content is not allowed', 'AskIndia Post', 'Mental Health Post', 'Spam', 'Disinformation'] ### Context: And in his final show, he is going to physically tackle Tabu ### Text: I'd like to see that, considering how tall Tabu is.

['All posts must be specific to India/Indians', 'Submission should only be in English', 'Personal attacks | Abuse | Hate speech', 'Witch-hunting | Personal Information | Meta', 'Original/Relevant Title | Incorrect flair', 'Old content | Reposts', 'TIL | Image Posts | Memes', 'Posts should have reputed source', 'Porn/Gore/NSFW | Self Promotion', 'Generative AI Content is not allowed', 'AskIndia Post', 'Mental Health Post', 'Spam', 'Disinformation']

Care to elaborate?

Christianity

dbrllgr

t3_5kxbhd

t1_dbrl3mr

I question the translation of the passage, while taking into account the historical context.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Harassment', 'Bigotry', 'Personal Attacks', 'Belittling Christianity / Proselytism', 'Support Threads', 'Subversion', 'Spam', 'Images', 'Topicality', 'COVID Policy'] ### Context: I question the translation of the passage, while taking into account the historical context. ### Text: Care to elaborate?

['Harassment', 'Bigotry', 'Personal Attacks', 'Belittling Christianity / Proselytism', 'Support Threads', 'Subversion', 'Spam', 'Images', 'Topicality', 'COVID Policy']

so fucked up it's beyond my understanding

hiphopheads

d5350v8

t3_4roed7

t1_d532u4f

jesus christ how can you fucking just stand there POINTING A GUN at a man who is bleeding to death. sociopath

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['No Unwelcome Content or Prohibited Behavior', 'No Questions or Requests', 'No Reposts or Overposted/Favorites List Songs', 'No Image Posts', 'No Chains or Formulaic/Overused/Meme Comments', 'No Rumors, Speculation or False Information', 'No Irrelevant Content', 'No Piracy', 'No Seeking Shares, Help, Advice or Collaborations', 'Use Proper Title Format', '11. No AI-Generated Songs'] ### Context: jesus christ how can you fucking just stand there POINTING A GUN at a man who is bleeding to death. sociopath ### Text: so fucked up it's beyond my understanding

['No Unwelcome Content or Prohibited Behavior', 'No Questions or Requests', 'No Reposts or Overposted/Favorites List Songs', 'No Image Posts', 'No Chains or Formulaic/Overused/Meme Comments', 'No Rumors, Speculation or False Information', 'No Irrelevant Content', 'No Piracy', 'No Seeking Shares, Help, Advice or Collaborations', 'Use Proper Title Format', '11. No AI-Generated Songs']

I'll never forget the day I saw on a menu in Philadelphia: "a succulent cut of lean, marbled beef" Nobody is trying to eat Kobe beef because it's lean, give it up.

food

dao3zkd

t3_5fxhz2

t1_danwa7e

I am 100% carnivore, and don't know if I need that much fat in my ribeye. I would like to find out though.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Original Images only (OC Only)', "Titles May Only Contain the Food's Name", 'Add a [Tag] into Your Title', 'No Low-Quality Posts or Comments', 'Be Nice', 'No Abusive Circlejerks', 'Spam/NSFW Gif or Image Comment', 'Blog/Website Linking'] ### Context: I am 100% carnivore, and don't know if I need that much fat in my ribeye. I would like to find out though. ### Text: I'll never forget the day I saw on a menu in Philadelphia: "a succulent cut of lean, marbled beef" Nobody is trying to eat Kobe beef because it's lean, give it up.

['Original Images only (OC Only)', "Titles May Only Contain the Food's Name", 'Add a [Tag] into Your Title', 'No Low-Quality Posts or Comments', 'Be Nice', 'No Abusive Circlejerks', 'Spam/NSFW Gif or Image Comment', 'Blog/Website Linking']

Having a few good match-ups does not a strong Pokemon make.

TheSilphRoad

ddwyoev

t3_5uss13

t1_ddwmgqs

Against Vaporeon, Blastoise, Feraligatr, Rhydon, she does well.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Keep things civil and courteous', 'Real world impact of a digital game', 'Allowed post types', 'We abide by the spirit of the game', 'Mod Fiat'] ### Context: Against Vaporeon, Blastoise, Feraligatr, Rhydon, she does well. ### Text: Having a few good match-ups does not a strong Pokemon make.

['Keep things civil and courteous', 'Real world impact of a digital game', 'Allowed post types', 'We abide by the spirit of the game', 'Mod Fiat']

>I teach a lot of languages, so I know grammar fairly well. I doubt it, or you would understand the difference between Church (proper noun) and church ("regular" noun). Sorry if you don't like it, but that's a fact and like I said you can drop the "I need something official" circle-jerk and use some critical thinkings skills to noodle it out (although, based on your gibberish above you seem to lack that skill).

Christianity

db5w6vi

t3_5i6gpe

t1_db5w3wo

I teach a lot of languages, so I know grammar fairly well. &gt;A proper noun describes a specific person, **place**, or thing. Check. &gt;**As a place**, a church does not need to be capitalized Welp. I don't think your own logic cashes out here. Like I said, if you find something official (or even coherent) to describe this, let me know.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Harassment', 'Bigotry', 'Personal Attacks', 'Belittling Christianity / Proselytism', 'Support Threads', 'Subversion', 'Spam', 'Images', 'Topicality', 'COVID Policy'] ### Context: I teach a lot of languages, so I know grammar fairly well. &gt;A proper noun describes a specific person, **place**, or thing. Check. &gt;**As a place**, a church does not need to be capitalized Welp. I don't think your own logic cashes out here. Like I said, if you find something official (or even coherent) to describe this, let me know. ### Text: >I teach a lot of languages, so I know grammar fairly well. I doubt it, or you would understand the difference between Church (proper noun) and church ("regular" noun). Sorry if you don't like it, but that's a fact and like I said you can drop the "I need something official" circle-jerk and use some critical thinkings skills to noodle it out (although, based on your gibberish above you seem to lack that skill).

['Harassment', 'Bigotry', 'Personal Attacks', 'Belittling Christianity / Proselytism', 'Support Threads', 'Subversion', 'Spam', 'Images', 'Topicality', 'COVID Policy']

The only worse way to end it would've been to have college Ted wake up before anything happens

BlackPeopleTwitter

ddlptnj

t3_5ta0pa

t1_ddlnxcz

Agreed. First four seasons are top notch TV. Fifth season is okay. Season 6-8 are awful, barring a few good episodes. The final 2mins are a kick in the teeth to the fans who've stuck it out.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Social media posts from black people only', 'Bad Faith Participation', 'Respectability', 'No Racism/Hate speech', 'Posts must be showcasing somebody being hilarious or insightful on social media.', 'Reddit Cliches', 'No reposts', 'Bad post title', "Don't complain about the use of AAVE or slang.", 'Please respect these voices of the users of this community', 'No posts from corporate or meme accounts', 'Moderator Fiat', '☑️ Country Club'] ### Context: Agreed. First four seasons are top notch TV. Fifth season is okay. Season 6-8 are awful, barring a few good episodes. The final 2mins are a kick in the teeth to the fans who've stuck it out. ### Text: The only worse way to end it would've been to have college Ted wake up before anything happens

['Social media posts from black people only', 'Bad Faith Participation', 'Respectability', 'No Racism/Hate speech', 'Posts must be showcasing somebody being hilarious or insightful on social media.', 'Reddit Cliches', 'No reposts', 'Bad post title', "Don't complain about the use of AAVE or slang.", 'Please respect these voices of the users of this community', 'No posts from corporate or meme accounts', 'Moderator Fiat', '☑️ Country Club']

Nsfw warning ^^^nobamboozleiswear

me_irl

dc8aguu

t3_5n06vm

t1_dc878l4

r/TsundereSharks

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['sexism, racism, otherwise demeaning', 'NSFW or otherwise sexual', 'gumball head', 'twitter jokeman, or a screenshot', 'upvote meme', 'too edgy', 'No reposts when using the OC flair', 'No generic memes'] ### Context: r/TsundereSharks ### Text: Nsfw warning ^^^nobamboozleiswear

['sexism, racism, otherwise demeaning', 'NSFW or otherwise sexual', 'gumball head', 'twitter jokeman, or a screenshot', 'upvote meme', 'too edgy', 'No reposts when using the OC flair', 'No generic memes']

I don't see how more people being covered and most people being worse off as a result is better. Very much, the poor are better off but the middle and rich are worse off and that's worth it? Not to me. The poor don't make the country strong. A health insurance market would actual competition would work well, and those without coverage would be able to get it through there.

PurplePillDebate

d9t47lv

t3_5bzkz0

t1_d9t3dlj

I agree, it has a multitude of problems. It still covers more people than removing it, as he said he would the moment he took office. He actually sounded very... liberal when he was praising the Canadian and Scottish systems but talk of that has since faded.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Observe Redditquette, and Follow All Site-Wide Rules.', 'Be Civil/No Personal Attacks', 'No Contentless Rhetoric', 'Do not abuse the new block function', 'No Race-Baiting or Racially Charged Content', 'No Incel/Black-Pill/Woe-Is-Me Content', 'No Personal Advice Posting', 'No N-count, looks, or feminism (not related to dating) posts', 'No Promoting Research Links or Subreddits Similar To Purple Pill Debate', 'No Circlejerking Posts', 'Responses to Debate/Q4 Posts Should Be Appropriate'] ### Context: I agree, it has a multitude of problems. It still covers more people than removing it, as he said he would the moment he took office. He actually sounded very... liberal when he was praising the Canadian and Scottish systems but talk of that has since faded. ### Text: I don't see how more people being covered and most people being worse off as a result is better. Very much, the poor are better off but the middle and rich are worse off and that's worth it? Not to me. The poor don't make the country strong. A health insurance market would actual competition would work well, and those without coverage would be able to get it through there.

['Observe Redditquette, and Follow All Site-Wide Rules.', 'Be Civil/No Personal Attacks', 'No Contentless Rhetoric', 'Do not abuse the new block function', 'No Race-Baiting or Racially Charged Content', 'No Incel/Black-Pill/Woe-Is-Me Content', 'No Personal Advice Posting', 'No N-count, looks, or feminism (not related to dating) posts', 'No Promoting Research Links or Subreddits Similar To Purple Pill Debate', 'No Circlejerking Posts', 'Responses to Debate/Q4 Posts Should Be Appropriate']

Lol, enjoy your "New Incoming Offers: (0)" for a while

GlobalOffensiveTrade

da3huqq

t3_5dcld8

t1_da3hsf2

ur fucking retarded

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: [] ### Context: ur fucking retarded ### Text: Lol, enjoy your "New Incoming Offers: (0)" for a while

[]

Source & Video: r/Sourcex/

gonewild

db5yws0

t3_5i5lnb

t1_db5j3e3

I would love to have those lips in my mouth

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['/r/gonewild is for posting visibly nude photos of yourself', 'Abusive, rude, or troll behavior is not permitted', 'No self-promotion or attempts to make a profit anywhere', 'No asking for upvotes (directly or indirectly)', 'Tag your post titles with the correct gender tag - [f], [m], [cd], [t], [?], [nb]', 'Do not feed the trolls', 'No name guessing or attempts to identify someone', 'No mentioning or pestering for off-site contact', 'Do not delete your verification post'] ### Context: I would love to have those lips in my mouth ### Text: Source & Video: r/Sourcex/

['/r/gonewild is for posting visibly nude photos of yourself', 'Abusive, rude, or troll behavior is not permitted', 'No self-promotion or attempts to make a profit anywhere', 'No asking for upvotes (directly or indirectly)', 'Tag your post titles with the correct gender tag - [f], [m], [cd], [t], [?], [nb]', 'Do not feed the trolls', 'No name guessing or attempts to identify someone', 'No mentioning or pestering for off-site contact', 'Do not delete your verification post']

fuck off cultist

politics

dcoeyg4

t3_5p4tc8

t1_dcoew3s

God Emperor Trump 2017 - ∞

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['General: No novelty accounts or bots', 'General: Rule-breaking username', 'General: No spam or solicitation', 'Comments: No incivility or personal attacks towards users', 'Comments: No flaming, baiting, or trolling', 'Comments: No witch hunts or personal information', 'Comments: Follow AMA specific rules', 'Posts: Submissions must be explicitly about US politics', 'Posts: Submissions must be published within the last 7 days', 'Posts: Submissions must be from the Approved Domain List', 'Posts: Titles must be the exact headline from the article.', 'Posts: Do not flood the new queue', 'Posts: No copy-pasted submissions or non-English articles', 'Posts: Disallowed submission types', 'Posts: Disclose employment or affiliation with a source'] ### Context: God Emperor Trump 2017 - ∞ ### Text: fuck off cultist

['General: No novelty accounts or bots', 'General: Rule-breaking username', 'General: No spam or solicitation', 'Comments: No incivility or personal attacks towards users', 'Comments: No flaming, baiting, or trolling', 'Comments: No witch hunts or personal information', 'Comments: Follow AMA specific rules', 'Posts: Submissions must be explicitly about US politics', 'Posts: Submissions must be published within the last 7 days', 'Posts: Submissions must be from the Approved Domain List', 'Posts: Titles must be the exact headline from the article.', 'Posts: Do not flood the new queue', 'Posts: No copy-pasted submissions or non-English articles', 'Posts: Disallowed submission types', 'Posts: Disclose employment or affiliation with a source']

Thank you

PoliticalDiscussion

d9kgd3x

t3_5aajix

t1_d9kfunn

Masto

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Keep it Civil.', 'Meta', 'Low investment', 'Submissions should be an impartial discussion prompt + questions.', 'Provide some background and context. Offer substantive avenues for discussion.', 'Everything in the post should be directly related to a political issue.', 'Formatting and housekeeping things:'] ### Context: Masto ### Text: Thank you

['Keep it Civil.', 'Meta', 'Low investment', 'Submissions should be an impartial discussion prompt + questions.', 'Provide some background and context. Offer substantive avenues for discussion.', 'Everything in the post should be directly related to a political issue.', 'Formatting and housekeeping things:']

Yeah, I've seen a few attempts... very few interested. I kind of wish it becomes the new ingame method. Woukd be fun to see new perspectives.

pokemongo

d8mv36w

t3_56ve6t

t1_d8mo2u0

I've been linking an app like that since the beginning. Not too many people seem to care about it sadly.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ["Be civil. Don't insult or attack each other, or share nsfw content.", 'All posts must be DIRECTLY related to POGO. Feedback for the subreddit should be in modmail', 'Do not post or advocate for cheating. We follow Niantics TOS in this sub.', 'Marketing', "Please don't post image macros (memes) w/o PoGo assets", 'Please use megathreads when available', "Please don't sell or trade", 'Trainer codes should not be shared here. Use the affiliated discord or relevant subreddit.'] ### Context: I've been linking an app like that since the beginning. Not too many people seem to care about it sadly. ### Text: Yeah, I've seen a few attempts... very few interested. I kind of wish it becomes the new ingame method. Woukd be fun to see new perspectives.

["Be civil. Don't insult or attack each other, or share nsfw content.", 'All posts must be DIRECTLY related to POGO. Feedback for the subreddit should be in modmail', 'Do not post or advocate for cheating. We follow Niantics TOS in this sub.', 'Marketing', "Please don't post image macros (memes) w/o PoGo assets", 'Please use megathreads when available', "Please don't sell or trade", 'Trainer codes should not be shared here. Use the affiliated discord or relevant subreddit.']

&gt;[**تصريح الرئيس الأسد لوسائل إعلام بلجيكية [13:01]**](http://youtu.be/C4w0SyJNoOI) &gt;&gt;President Assad's statement to the BELGIAN Media.. &gt; [*^PresidencySy*](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg1Noz8I9UoZCF_Nh20rJdA) ^in ^News ^&amp; ^Politics &gt;*^1,633 ^views ^since ^Feb ^2017* [^bot ^info](/r/youtubefactsbot/wiki/index)

syriancivilwar

ddhafyz

t3_5sr8or

t1_ddhafwq

Full Interview https://youtu.be/C4w0SyJNoOI

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Rule 1: Civility', 'Rule 2: Editorialization', 'Rule 3: Racism', 'Rule 4: Baiting', 'Rule 5: Sarcasm and Cheerposting', 'Rule 6: Derailing and Relevance', 'Rule 7: Terminology', 'Rule 8: Trivializing Violence', 'Rule 9: Non-substantive', 'Rule 10: Recruitment', 'Rule 11: AMA', 'Rule 12: Media Personalities', 'Rule 13: Timeliness', 'Rule 14: Alts & Ban evasion'] ### Context: Full Interview https://youtu.be/C4w0SyJNoOI ### Text: &gt;[**تصريح الرئيس الأسد لوسائل إعلام بلجيكية [13:01]**](http://youtu.be/C4w0SyJNoOI) &gt;&gt;President Assad's statement to the BELGIAN Media.. &gt; [*^PresidencySy*](https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCg1Noz8I9UoZCF_Nh20rJdA) ^in ^News ^&amp; ^Politics &gt;*^1,633 ^views ^since ^Feb ^2017* [^bot ^info](/r/youtubefactsbot/wiki/index)

['Rule 1: Civility', 'Rule 2: Editorialization', 'Rule 3: Racism', 'Rule 4: Baiting', 'Rule 5: Sarcasm and Cheerposting', 'Rule 6: Derailing and Relevance', 'Rule 7: Terminology', 'Rule 8: Trivializing Violence', 'Rule 9: Non-substantive', 'Rule 10: Recruitment', 'Rule 11: AMA', 'Rule 12: Media Personalities', 'Rule 13: Timeliness', 'Rule 14: Alts & Ban evasion']

What the fuck?

OutOfTheLoop

db9q25h

t3_5ilfh9

t1_db9n4id

**Goodnight HULKAMANIACS and jabronie marks without a life that don't know it a work when you work a work and work yourself into a shoot,marks

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Post title must be a current, unbiased, and coherent question', 'Text body must include context', 'Recently asked - already on the frontpage (search)', 'Top-level comment must answer or ask a follow-up', 'Uncivil', 'Not a loop - better suited for another subreddit', 'No AI Answers'] ### Context: **Goodnight HULKAMANIACS and jabronie marks without a life that don't know it a work when you work a work and work yourself into a shoot,marks ### Text: What the fuck?

['Post title must be a current, unbiased, and coherent question', 'Text body must include context', 'Recently asked - already on the frontpage (search)', 'Top-level comment must answer or ask a follow-up', 'Uncivil', 'Not a loop - better suited for another subreddit', 'No AI Answers']

done

GlobalOffensiveTrade

d8fbck9

t3_5603ae

t1_d8fb3cn

Hello, sent for 3 cute ones : http://steamcommunity.com/id/mAr1uS Thank you for your contribution to my collection.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: [] ### Context: Hello, sent for 3 cute ones : http://steamcommunity.com/id/mAr1uS Thank you for your contribution to my collection. ### Text: done

[]

what the fuck

videos

daxohpl

t3_5h2x3y

t1_daxhzmm

[removed]

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Videos Only', 'No Politics', 'No Personal Information or Witch-Hunting', 'No Indirect Links', 'No Porn, Gore, or Death', 'No Solicitation of Votes or Views', 'No Hate Speech', 'No Public Freakouts', 'No Third Party Licensing', 'Very limited self-promotion / OC'] ### Context: [removed] ### Text: what the fuck

['Videos Only', 'No Politics', 'No Personal Information or Witch-Hunting', 'No Indirect Links', 'No Porn, Gore, or Death', 'No Solicitation of Votes or Views', 'No Hate Speech', 'No Public Freakouts', 'No Third Party Licensing', 'Very limited self-promotion / OC']

Thanks!

SandersForPresident

d3kx5bc

t3_4kz8fv

t1_d3k0hxj

http://www.veterans.senate.gov/hearings/pending-legislation-052416

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Be respectful', 'Advance progressive candidates and policies', 'Stay on topic', 'Write good post titles', 'Repost', 'Unauthorized Solicitation', 'Inaccurate', "Reddit's Global Rules", 'Social media must be screenshots.', 'No drama'] ### Context: http://www.veterans.senate.gov/hearings/pending-legislation-052416 ### Text: Thanks!

['Be respectful', 'Advance progressive candidates and policies', 'Stay on topic', 'Write good post titles', 'Repost', 'Unauthorized Solicitation', 'Inaccurate', "Reddit's Global Rules", 'Social media must be screenshots.', 'No drama']

people have covered all the important stuff so now I'm wondering, how's your hand?

tifu

db0gfey

t3_5hg2bv

t1_db0e26s

Brisbane. As for the punch itself, well, I don't know boxing, but you can imagine an amateur golfer getting a hole in one, or a casual bowler scoring a perfect game? If boxing has a term for that sort of thing, that's what it was. The target was in *just* the right point in space for my shoulder to really drive the swing, at *just* the right distance so I hit with maximum force with proper follow through. Everything just came together like you'd see in a "how too" demonstration. You know, except for the fact that it was a 15 year old kid playing sillybuggers I ended up hitting. But there was no conscious thought at all. I just did it. If I'd been *trying* to do it, I probably would have missed and hit the wall or something.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Use proper formatting', 'Posts must be about you', 'Must be your fault', 'No overly vulgar posts/Illegal Advice', 'Must be actual fuckups', "Be civil and don't be disruptive", 'No self-promotion', 'Mod discretion'] ### Context: Brisbane. As for the punch itself, well, I don't know boxing, but you can imagine an amateur golfer getting a hole in one, or a casual bowler scoring a perfect game? If boxing has a term for that sort of thing, that's what it was. The target was in *just* the right point in space for my shoulder to really drive the swing, at *just* the right distance so I hit with maximum force with proper follow through. Everything just came together like you'd see in a "how too" demonstration. You know, except for the fact that it was a 15 year old kid playing sillybuggers I ended up hitting. But there was no conscious thought at all. I just did it. If I'd been *trying* to do it, I probably would have missed and hit the wall or something. ### Text: people have covered all the important stuff so now I'm wondering, how's your hand?

['Use proper formatting', 'Posts must be about you', 'Must be your fault', 'No overly vulgar posts/Illegal Advice', 'Must be actual fuckups', "Be civil and don't be disruptive", 'No self-promotion', 'Mod discretion']

Like she lost the DNC nomination against Barrack Hussein Obama. Truly a who's who of Victim Olympics. Gay Black Muslim vs Woman.

politics

dca7p08

t3_5nbrcc

t1_dca7d0l

She lost the election by having more voters than trump.

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['General: No novelty accounts or bots', 'General: Rule-breaking username', 'General: No spam or solicitation', 'Comments: No incivility or personal attacks towards users', 'Comments: No flaming, baiting, or trolling', 'Comments: No witch hunts or personal information', 'Comments: Follow AMA specific rules', 'Posts: Submissions must be explicitly about US politics', 'Posts: Submissions must be published within the last 7 days', 'Posts: Submissions must be from the Approved Domain List', 'Posts: Titles must be the exact headline from the article.', 'Posts: Do not flood the new queue', 'Posts: No copy-pasted submissions or non-English articles', 'Posts: Disallowed submission types', 'Posts: Disclose employment or affiliation with a source'] ### Context: She lost the election by having more voters than trump. ### Text: Like she lost the DNC nomination against Barrack Hussein Obama. Truly a who's who of Victim Olympics. Gay Black Muslim vs Woman.

['General: No novelty accounts or bots', 'General: Rule-breaking username', 'General: No spam or solicitation', 'Comments: No incivility or personal attacks towards users', 'Comments: No flaming, baiting, or trolling', 'Comments: No witch hunts or personal information', 'Comments: Follow AMA specific rules', 'Posts: Submissions must be explicitly about US politics', 'Posts: Submissions must be published within the last 7 days', 'Posts: Submissions must be from the Approved Domain List', 'Posts: Titles must be the exact headline from the article.', 'Posts: Do not flood the new queue', 'Posts: No copy-pasted submissions or non-English articles', 'Posts: Disallowed submission types', 'Posts: Disclose employment or affiliation with a source']

Ya, [is probably pr0nz](https://imgur.com/Y9o7U.jpg)

BlackPeopleTwitter

dbybttl

t3_5lp9n3

t1_dbxu6qo

Has anyone found out yet?

You are acting as a moderator. You will be given a piece of text, a set of rules that the text should follow, and the context to which this text is replying. Your task is to determine if the given text is undesirable or not based on the information provided for you. ### Rules: ['Social media posts from black people only', 'Bad Faith Participation', 'Respectability', 'No Racism/Hate speech', 'Posts must be showcasing somebody being hilarious or insightful on social media.', 'Reddit Cliches', 'No reposts', 'Bad post title', "Don't complain about the use of AAVE or slang.", 'Please respect these voices of the users of this community', 'No posts from corporate or meme accounts', 'Moderator Fiat', '☑️ Country Club'] ### Context: Has anyone found out yet? ### Text: Ya, [is probably pr0nz](https://imgur.com/Y9o7U.jpg)

['Social media posts from black people only', 'Bad Faith Participation', 'Respectability', 'No Racism/Hate speech', 'Posts must be showcasing somebody being hilarious or insightful on social media.', 'Reddit Cliches', 'No reposts', 'Bad post title', "Don't complain about the use of AAVE or slang.", 'Please respect these voices of the users of this community', 'No posts from corporate or meme accounts', 'Moderator Fiat', '☑️ Country Club']