Datasets:

tzkkkkk

/

ip

like 0

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination E. We find that only router A is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N1:192.1.12.0/24 with the next hop as router B (A,set-static,B). Task2: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N2:192.1.13.0/24 with the next hop as router K (A,set-static,K). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from D to 300 on router E (E,set-localpre,D). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node A as starting points.. OSPF1:(B-C-E) OSPF2:(K-F-E).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 192.1.12.0/24 and N2: 192.1.13.0/24. I want the traffic in the router network destined for N1 to follow the path [A-B-C-E] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [A-K-F-E] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that only router London is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.51.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (London,set-static,Madrid). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node London as starting points.OSPF1: (Paris-Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Madrid-Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.51.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Madrid-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that routers London and Paris are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task3: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task4: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Dublin (Paris,set-static,Dublin). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Paris as starting points. OSPF1: (Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 207.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.50.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Paris-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Sapporo. We find that routers Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task2: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task3: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Kyoto (Osaka,set-static,Kyoto). Task4: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Hiroshima (Osaka,set-static,Hiroshima). Task5: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Fukuoka (Nagoya,set-static,Fukuoka). Task6: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Kobe (Nagoya,set-static,Kobe). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Yokohama to 300 on router Sapporo (Sapporo,set-localpre,Yokohama). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya as starting points. OSPF1: (Kyoto-Nagoya) OSPF2: (Fukuoka-Sapporo) OSPF3: (Hiroshima-Nagoya) OSPF4: (Kobe-Sapporo).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.115.0/24 and N2: 198.53.102.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Kyoto-Nagoya-Fukuoka-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Hiroshima-Nagoya-Kobe-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Darwin. We find that routers Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task2: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task3: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Brisbane (Melbourne,set-static,Brisbane). Task4: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Hobart (Melbourne,set-static,Hobart). Task5: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Adelaide (Perth,set-static,Adelaide). Task6: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Cairns (Perth,set-static,Cairns). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Canberra to 300 on router Darwin (Darwin,set-localpre,Canberra). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth as starting points. OSPF1: (Brisbane-Perth) OSPF2: (Adelaide-Darwin) OSPF3: (Hobart-Perth) OSPF4: (Cairns-Darwin).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.116.0/24 and N2: 198.54.103.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth-Adelaide-Darwin] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Hobart-Perth-Cairns-Darwin] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Wuhan. We find that routers Beijing and Guangzhou are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shanghai (Beijing,set-static,Shanghai). Task2: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Tianjin (Beijing,set-static,Tianjin). Task3: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shenzhen (Guangzhou,set-static,Shenzhen). Task4: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Nanjing (Guangzhou,set-static,Nanjing). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Chengdu to 300 on router Wuhan (Wuhan,set-localpre,Chengdu). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Beijing and Guangzhou. OSPF1:(Shanghai-Guangzhou) OSPF2:(Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan) OSPF3:(Tianjin-Guangzhou) OSPF4:(Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.117.0/24 and N2: 198.55.104.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Beijing-Shanghai-Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Beijing-Tianjin-Guangzhou-Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Budapest. We find that routers Amsterdam and Vienna are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Amsterdam,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Amsterdam,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Prague (Vienna,set-static,Prague). Task4: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Barcelona (Vienna,set-static,Barcelona). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Warsaw to 300 on router Budapest (Budapest,set-localpre,Warsaw). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Amsterdam and Vienna. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich-Vienna) OSPF2:(Prague-Budapest) OSPF3:(Brussels-Madrid-Vienna) OSPF4:(Barcelona-Budapest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.118.0/24 and N2: 198.56.105.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Berlin-Munich-Vienna-Prague-Budapest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Brussels-Madrid-Vienna-Barcelona-Budapest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Munich. We find that routers Paris and Munich are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Paris,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Rome (Munich,set-static,Rome). Task4: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (Munich,set-static,Madrid). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Paris and Munich. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich) OSPF2:(Brussels-Munich).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.119.0/24 and N2: 198.57.106.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Paris-Berlin-Munich-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Paris-Brussels-Munich-Madrid] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Atlanta. We find that routers SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Denver (SanFrancisco,set-static,Denver). Task2: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Seattle (SanFrancisco,set-static,Seattle). Task3: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router NewYork (Chicago,set-static,NewYork). Task4: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Dallas (Chicago,set-static,Dallas). Task5: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Philadelphia (Boston,set-static,Philadelphia). Task6: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Detroit (Boston,set-static,Detroit). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston. OSPF1:(Denver-Chicago) OSPF2:(NewYork-Boston) OSPF3:(Philadelphia-Atlanta) OSPF4:(Seattle-Dallas-Chicago) OSPF5:(Detroit-Atlanta).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.120.0/24 and N2: 198.58.107.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Denver-Chicago-NewYork-Boston-Philadelphia-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Seattle-Dallas-Chicago-Boston-Detroit-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Bucharest. We find that routers London and Berlin are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Amsterdam (London,set-static,Amsterdam). Task3: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Bucharest (Berlin,set-static,Bucharest). Task4: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Munich (Berlin,set-static,Munich). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Berlin. OSPF1:(Paris-Brussels-Berlin) OSPF2:(Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin) OSPF3:(Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.121.0/24 and N2: 198.59.108.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Brussels-Berlin-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin-Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination LosAngeles. We find that routers Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Orlando (Miami,set-static,Orlando). Task2: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Tampa (Miami,set-static,Tampa). Task3: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Nashville (Atlanta,set-static,Nashville). Task4: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Houston (Atlanta,set-static,Houston). Task5: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Phoenix (Dallas,set-static,Phoenix). Task6: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router SanDiego (Dallas,set-static,SanDiego). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas. OSPF1:(Orlando-Atlanta) OSPF2:(Nashville-Dallas) OSPF3:(Tampa-Atlanta) OSPF5:(Houston-Dallas) .

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.124.0/24 and N2: 198.62.111.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Nashville-Dallas-Phoenix] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Miami-Tampa-Atlanta-Houston-Dallas-SanDiego] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination E. We find that only router A is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N1:192.1.12.0/24 with the next hop as router B (A,set-static,B). Task2: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N2:192.1.13.0/24 with the next hop as router K (A,set-static,K). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from D to 300 on router E (E,set-localpre,D). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node A as starting points.. OSPF1:(B-C-E) OSPF2:(K-F-E).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 192.1.12.0/24 and N2: 192.1.13.0/24. I want the traffic in the router network destined for N1 to follow the path [A-B-C-E] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [A-K-F-E] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that only router London is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.51.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (London,set-static,Madrid). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node London as starting points.OSPF1: (Paris-Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Madrid-Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.51.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Madrid-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that routers London and Paris are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task3: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task4: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Dublin (Paris,set-static,Dublin). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Paris as starting points. OSPF1: (Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 207.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.50.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Paris-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Sapporo. We find that routers Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task2: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task3: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Kyoto (Osaka,set-static,Kyoto). Task4: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Hiroshima (Osaka,set-static,Hiroshima). Task5: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Fukuoka (Nagoya,set-static,Fukuoka). Task6: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Kobe (Nagoya,set-static,Kobe). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Yokohama to 300 on router Sapporo (Sapporo,set-localpre,Yokohama). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya as starting points. OSPF1: (Kyoto-Nagoya) OSPF2: (Fukuoka-Sapporo) OSPF3: (Hiroshima-Nagoya) OSPF4: (Kobe-Sapporo).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.115.0/24 and N2: 198.53.102.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Kyoto-Nagoya-Fukuoka-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Hiroshima-Nagoya-Kobe-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Darwin. We find that routers Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task2: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task3: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Brisbane (Melbourne,set-static,Brisbane). Task4: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Hobart (Melbourne,set-static,Hobart). Task5: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Adelaide (Perth,set-static,Adelaide). Task6: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Cairns (Perth,set-static,Cairns). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Canberra to 300 on router Darwin (Darwin,set-localpre,Canberra). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth as starting points. OSPF1: (Brisbane-Perth) OSPF2: (Adelaide-Darwin) OSPF3: (Hobart-Perth) OSPF4: (Cairns-Darwin).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.116.0/24 and N2: 198.54.103.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth-Adelaide-Darwin] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Hobart-Perth-Cairns-Darwin] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Wuhan. We find that routers Beijing and Guangzhou are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shanghai (Beijing,set-static,Shanghai). Task2: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Tianjin (Beijing,set-static,Tianjin). Task3: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shenzhen (Guangzhou,set-static,Shenzhen). Task4: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Nanjing (Guangzhou,set-static,Nanjing). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Chengdu to 300 on router Wuhan (Wuhan,set-localpre,Chengdu). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Beijing and Guangzhou. OSPF1:(Shanghai-Guangzhou) OSPF2:(Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan) OSPF3:(Tianjin-Guangzhou) OSPF4:(Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.117.0/24 and N2: 198.55.104.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Beijing-Shanghai-Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Beijing-Tianjin-Guangzhou-Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Budapest. We find that routers Amsterdam and Vienna are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Amsterdam,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Amsterdam,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Prague (Vienna,set-static,Prague). Task4: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Barcelona (Vienna,set-static,Barcelona). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Warsaw to 300 on router Budapest (Budapest,set-localpre,Warsaw). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Amsterdam and Vienna. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich-Vienna) OSPF2:(Prague-Budapest) OSPF3:(Brussels-Madrid-Vienna) OSPF4:(Barcelona-Budapest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.118.0/24 and N2: 198.56.105.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Berlin-Munich-Vienna-Prague-Budapest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Brussels-Madrid-Vienna-Barcelona-Budapest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Munich. We find that routers Paris and Munich are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Paris,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Rome (Munich,set-static,Rome). Task4: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (Munich,set-static,Madrid). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Paris and Munich. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich) OSPF2:(Brussels-Munich).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.119.0/24 and N2: 198.57.106.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Paris-Berlin-Munich-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Paris-Brussels-Munich-Madrid] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Atlanta. We find that routers SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Denver (SanFrancisco,set-static,Denver). Task2: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Seattle (SanFrancisco,set-static,Seattle). Task3: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router NewYork (Chicago,set-static,NewYork). Task4: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Dallas (Chicago,set-static,Dallas). Task5: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Philadelphia (Boston,set-static,Philadelphia). Task6: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Detroit (Boston,set-static,Detroit). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston. OSPF1:(Denver-Chicago) OSPF2:(NewYork-Boston) OSPF3:(Philadelphia-Atlanta) OSPF4:(Seattle-Dallas-Chicago) OSPF5:(Detroit-Atlanta).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.120.0/24 and N2: 198.58.107.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Denver-Chicago-NewYork-Boston-Philadelphia-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Seattle-Dallas-Chicago-Boston-Detroit-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Bucharest. We find that routers London and Berlin are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Amsterdam (London,set-static,Amsterdam). Task3: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Bucharest (Berlin,set-static,Bucharest). Task4: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Munich (Berlin,set-static,Munich). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Berlin. OSPF1:(Paris-Brussels-Berlin) OSPF2:(Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin) OSPF3:(Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.121.0/24 and N2: 198.59.108.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Brussels-Berlin-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin-Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination LosAngeles. We find that routers Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Orlando (Miami,set-static,Orlando). Task2: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Tampa (Miami,set-static,Tampa). Task3: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Nashville (Atlanta,set-static,Nashville). Task4: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Houston (Atlanta,set-static,Houston). Task5: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Phoenix (Dallas,set-static,Phoenix). Task6: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router SanDiego (Dallas,set-static,SanDiego). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas. OSPF1:(Orlando-Atlanta) OSPF2:(Nashville-Dallas) OSPF3:(Tampa-Atlanta) OSPF5:(Houston-Dallas) .

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.124.0/24 and N2: 198.62.111.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Nashville-Dallas-Phoenix] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Miami-Tampa-Atlanta-Houston-Dallas-SanDiego] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination E. We find that only router A is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N1:192.1.12.0/24 with the next hop as router B (A,set-static,B). Task2: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N2:192.1.13.0/24 with the next hop as router K (A,set-static,K). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from D to 300 on router E (E,set-localpre,D). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node A as starting points.. OSPF1:(B-C-E) OSPF2:(K-F-E).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 192.1.12.0/24 and N2: 192.1.13.0/24. I want the traffic in the router network destined for N1 to follow the path [A-B-C-E] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [A-K-F-E] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that only router London is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.51.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (London,set-static,Madrid). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node London as starting points.OSPF1: (Paris-Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Madrid-Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.51.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Madrid-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that routers London and Paris are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task3: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task4: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Dublin (Paris,set-static,Dublin). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Paris as starting points. OSPF1: (Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 207.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.50.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Paris-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Sapporo. We find that routers Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task2: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task3: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Kyoto (Osaka,set-static,Kyoto). Task4: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Hiroshima (Osaka,set-static,Hiroshima). Task5: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Fukuoka (Nagoya,set-static,Fukuoka). Task6: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Kobe (Nagoya,set-static,Kobe). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Yokohama to 300 on router Sapporo (Sapporo,set-localpre,Yokohama). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya as starting points. OSPF1: (Kyoto-Nagoya) OSPF2: (Fukuoka-Sapporo) OSPF3: (Hiroshima-Nagoya) OSPF4: (Kobe-Sapporo).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.115.0/24 and N2: 198.53.102.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Kyoto-Nagoya-Fukuoka-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Hiroshima-Nagoya-Kobe-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Darwin. We find that routers Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task2: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task3: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Brisbane (Melbourne,set-static,Brisbane). Task4: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Hobart (Melbourne,set-static,Hobart). Task5: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Adelaide (Perth,set-static,Adelaide). Task6: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Cairns (Perth,set-static,Cairns). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Canberra to 300 on router Darwin (Darwin,set-localpre,Canberra). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth as starting points. OSPF1: (Brisbane-Perth) OSPF2: (Adelaide-Darwin) OSPF3: (Hobart-Perth) OSPF4: (Cairns-Darwin).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.116.0/24 and N2: 198.54.103.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth-Adelaide-Darwin] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Hobart-Perth-Cairns-Darwin] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Wuhan. We find that routers Beijing and Guangzhou are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shanghai (Beijing,set-static,Shanghai). Task2: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Tianjin (Beijing,set-static,Tianjin). Task3: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shenzhen (Guangzhou,set-static,Shenzhen). Task4: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Nanjing (Guangzhou,set-static,Nanjing). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Chengdu to 300 on router Wuhan (Wuhan,set-localpre,Chengdu). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Beijing and Guangzhou. OSPF1:(Shanghai-Guangzhou) OSPF2:(Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan) OSPF3:(Tianjin-Guangzhou) OSPF4:(Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.117.0/24 and N2: 198.55.104.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Beijing-Shanghai-Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Beijing-Tianjin-Guangzhou-Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Budapest. We find that routers Amsterdam and Vienna are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Amsterdam,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Amsterdam,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Prague (Vienna,set-static,Prague). Task4: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Barcelona (Vienna,set-static,Barcelona). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Warsaw to 300 on router Budapest (Budapest,set-localpre,Warsaw). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Amsterdam and Vienna. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich-Vienna) OSPF2:(Prague-Budapest) OSPF3:(Brussels-Madrid-Vienna) OSPF4:(Barcelona-Budapest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.118.0/24 and N2: 198.56.105.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Berlin-Munich-Vienna-Prague-Budapest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Brussels-Madrid-Vienna-Barcelona-Budapest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Munich. We find that routers Paris and Munich are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Paris,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Rome (Munich,set-static,Rome). Task4: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (Munich,set-static,Madrid). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Paris and Munich. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich) OSPF2:(Brussels-Munich).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.119.0/24 and N2: 198.57.106.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Paris-Berlin-Munich-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Paris-Brussels-Munich-Madrid] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Atlanta. We find that routers SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Denver (SanFrancisco,set-static,Denver). Task2: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Seattle (SanFrancisco,set-static,Seattle). Task3: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router NewYork (Chicago,set-static,NewYork). Task4: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Dallas (Chicago,set-static,Dallas). Task5: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Philadelphia (Boston,set-static,Philadelphia). Task6: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Detroit (Boston,set-static,Detroit). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston. OSPF1:(Denver-Chicago) OSPF2:(NewYork-Boston) OSPF3:(Philadelphia-Atlanta) OSPF4:(Seattle-Dallas-Chicago) OSPF5:(Detroit-Atlanta).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.120.0/24 and N2: 198.58.107.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Denver-Chicago-NewYork-Boston-Philadelphia-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Seattle-Dallas-Chicago-Boston-Detroit-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Bucharest. We find that routers London and Berlin are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Amsterdam (London,set-static,Amsterdam). Task3: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Bucharest (Berlin,set-static,Bucharest). Task4: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Munich (Berlin,set-static,Munich). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Berlin. OSPF1:(Paris-Brussels-Berlin) OSPF2:(Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin) OSPF3:(Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.121.0/24 and N2: 198.59.108.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Brussels-Berlin-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin-Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination LosAngeles. We find that routers Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Orlando (Miami,set-static,Orlando). Task2: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Tampa (Miami,set-static,Tampa). Task3: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Nashville (Atlanta,set-static,Nashville). Task4: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Houston (Atlanta,set-static,Houston). Task5: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Phoenix (Dallas,set-static,Phoenix). Task6: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router SanDiego (Dallas,set-static,SanDiego). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas. OSPF1:(Orlando-Atlanta) OSPF2:(Nashville-Dallas) OSPF3:(Tampa-Atlanta) OSPF5:(Houston-Dallas) .

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.124.0/24 and N2: 198.62.111.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Nashville-Dallas-Phoenix] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Miami-Tampa-Atlanta-Houston-Dallas-SanDiego] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination E. We find that only router A is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N1:192.1.12.0/24 with the next hop as router B (A,set-static,B). Task2: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N2:192.1.13.0/24 with the next hop as router K (A,set-static,K). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from D to 300 on router E (E,set-localpre,D). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node A as starting points.. OSPF1:(B-C-E) OSPF2:(K-F-E).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 192.1.12.0/24 and N2: 192.1.13.0/24. I want the traffic in the router network destined for N1 to follow the path [A-B-C-E] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [A-K-F-E] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that only router London is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.51.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (London,set-static,Madrid). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node London as starting points.OSPF1: (Paris-Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Madrid-Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.51.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Madrid-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that routers London and Paris are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task3: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task4: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Dublin (Paris,set-static,Dublin). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Paris as starting points. OSPF1: (Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 207.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.50.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Paris-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Sapporo. We find that routers Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task2: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task3: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Kyoto (Osaka,set-static,Kyoto). Task4: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Hiroshima (Osaka,set-static,Hiroshima). Task5: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Fukuoka (Nagoya,set-static,Fukuoka). Task6: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Kobe (Nagoya,set-static,Kobe). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Yokohama to 300 on router Sapporo (Sapporo,set-localpre,Yokohama). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya as starting points. OSPF1: (Kyoto-Nagoya) OSPF2: (Fukuoka-Sapporo) OSPF3: (Hiroshima-Nagoya) OSPF4: (Kobe-Sapporo).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.115.0/24 and N2: 198.53.102.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Kyoto-Nagoya-Fukuoka-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Hiroshima-Nagoya-Kobe-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Darwin. We find that routers Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task2: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task3: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Brisbane (Melbourne,set-static,Brisbane). Task4: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Hobart (Melbourne,set-static,Hobart). Task5: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Adelaide (Perth,set-static,Adelaide). Task6: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Cairns (Perth,set-static,Cairns). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Canberra to 300 on router Darwin (Darwin,set-localpre,Canberra). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth as starting points. OSPF1: (Brisbane-Perth) OSPF2: (Adelaide-Darwin) OSPF3: (Hobart-Perth) OSPF4: (Cairns-Darwin).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.116.0/24 and N2: 198.54.103.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth-Adelaide-Darwin] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Hobart-Perth-Cairns-Darwin] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Wuhan. We find that routers Beijing and Guangzhou are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shanghai (Beijing,set-static,Shanghai). Task2: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Tianjin (Beijing,set-static,Tianjin). Task3: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shenzhen (Guangzhou,set-static,Shenzhen). Task4: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Nanjing (Guangzhou,set-static,Nanjing). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Chengdu to 300 on router Wuhan (Wuhan,set-localpre,Chengdu). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Beijing and Guangzhou. OSPF1:(Shanghai-Guangzhou) OSPF2:(Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan) OSPF3:(Tianjin-Guangzhou) OSPF4:(Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.117.0/24 and N2: 198.55.104.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Beijing-Shanghai-Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Beijing-Tianjin-Guangzhou-Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Budapest. We find that routers Amsterdam and Vienna are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Amsterdam,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Amsterdam,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Prague (Vienna,set-static,Prague). Task4: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Barcelona (Vienna,set-static,Barcelona). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Warsaw to 300 on router Budapest (Budapest,set-localpre,Warsaw). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Amsterdam and Vienna. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich-Vienna) OSPF2:(Prague-Budapest) OSPF3:(Brussels-Madrid-Vienna) OSPF4:(Barcelona-Budapest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.118.0/24 and N2: 198.56.105.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Berlin-Munich-Vienna-Prague-Budapest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Brussels-Madrid-Vienna-Barcelona-Budapest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Munich. We find that routers Paris and Munich are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Paris,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Rome (Munich,set-static,Rome). Task4: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (Munich,set-static,Madrid). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Paris and Munich. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich) OSPF2:(Brussels-Munich).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.119.0/24 and N2: 198.57.106.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Paris-Berlin-Munich-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Paris-Brussels-Munich-Madrid] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Atlanta. We find that routers SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Denver (SanFrancisco,set-static,Denver). Task2: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Seattle (SanFrancisco,set-static,Seattle). Task3: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router NewYork (Chicago,set-static,NewYork). Task4: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Dallas (Chicago,set-static,Dallas). Task5: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Philadelphia (Boston,set-static,Philadelphia). Task6: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Detroit (Boston,set-static,Detroit). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston. OSPF1:(Denver-Chicago) OSPF2:(NewYork-Boston) OSPF3:(Philadelphia-Atlanta) OSPF4:(Seattle-Dallas-Chicago) OSPF5:(Detroit-Atlanta).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.120.0/24 and N2: 198.58.107.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Denver-Chicago-NewYork-Boston-Philadelphia-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Seattle-Dallas-Chicago-Boston-Detroit-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Bucharest. We find that routers London and Berlin are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Amsterdam (London,set-static,Amsterdam). Task3: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Bucharest (Berlin,set-static,Bucharest). Task4: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Munich (Berlin,set-static,Munich). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Berlin. OSPF1:(Paris-Brussels-Berlin) OSPF2:(Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin) OSPF3:(Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.121.0/24 and N2: 198.59.108.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Brussels-Berlin-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin-Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination LosAngeles. We find that routers Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Orlando (Miami,set-static,Orlando). Task2: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Tampa (Miami,set-static,Tampa). Task3: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Nashville (Atlanta,set-static,Nashville). Task4: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Houston (Atlanta,set-static,Houston). Task5: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Phoenix (Dallas,set-static,Phoenix). Task6: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router SanDiego (Dallas,set-static,SanDiego). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas. OSPF1:(Orlando-Atlanta) OSPF2:(Nashville-Dallas) OSPF3:(Tampa-Atlanta) OSPF5:(Houston-Dallas) .

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.124.0/24 and N2: 198.62.111.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Nashville-Dallas-Phoenix] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Miami-Tampa-Atlanta-Houston-Dallas-SanDiego] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination E. We find that only router A is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N1:192.1.12.0/24 with the next hop as router B (A,set-static,B). Task2: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N2:192.1.13.0/24 with the next hop as router K (A,set-static,K). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from D to 300 on router E (E,set-localpre,D). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node A as starting points.. OSPF1:(B-C-E) OSPF2:(K-F-E).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 192.1.12.0/24 and N2: 192.1.13.0/24. I want the traffic in the router network destined for N1 to follow the path [A-B-C-E] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [A-K-F-E] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that only router London is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.51.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (London,set-static,Madrid). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node London as starting points.OSPF1: (Paris-Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Madrid-Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.51.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Madrid-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that routers London and Paris are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task3: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task4: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Dublin (Paris,set-static,Dublin). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Paris as starting points. OSPF1: (Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 207.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.50.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Paris-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Sapporo. We find that routers Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task2: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task3: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Kyoto (Osaka,set-static,Kyoto). Task4: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Hiroshima (Osaka,set-static,Hiroshima). Task5: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Fukuoka (Nagoya,set-static,Fukuoka). Task6: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Kobe (Nagoya,set-static,Kobe). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Yokohama to 300 on router Sapporo (Sapporo,set-localpre,Yokohama). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya as starting points. OSPF1: (Kyoto-Nagoya) OSPF2: (Fukuoka-Sapporo) OSPF3: (Hiroshima-Nagoya) OSPF4: (Kobe-Sapporo).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.115.0/24 and N2: 198.53.102.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Kyoto-Nagoya-Fukuoka-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Hiroshima-Nagoya-Kobe-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Darwin. We find that routers Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task2: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task3: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Brisbane (Melbourne,set-static,Brisbane). Task4: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Hobart (Melbourne,set-static,Hobart). Task5: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Adelaide (Perth,set-static,Adelaide). Task6: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Cairns (Perth,set-static,Cairns). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Canberra to 300 on router Darwin (Darwin,set-localpre,Canberra). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth as starting points. OSPF1: (Brisbane-Perth) OSPF2: (Adelaide-Darwin) OSPF3: (Hobart-Perth) OSPF4: (Cairns-Darwin).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.116.0/24 and N2: 198.54.103.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth-Adelaide-Darwin] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Hobart-Perth-Cairns-Darwin] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Wuhan. We find that routers Beijing and Guangzhou are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shanghai (Beijing,set-static,Shanghai). Task2: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Tianjin (Beijing,set-static,Tianjin). Task3: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shenzhen (Guangzhou,set-static,Shenzhen). Task4: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Nanjing (Guangzhou,set-static,Nanjing). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Chengdu to 300 on router Wuhan (Wuhan,set-localpre,Chengdu). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Beijing and Guangzhou. OSPF1:(Shanghai-Guangzhou) OSPF2:(Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan) OSPF3:(Tianjin-Guangzhou) OSPF4:(Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.117.0/24 and N2: 198.55.104.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Beijing-Shanghai-Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Beijing-Tianjin-Guangzhou-Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Budapest. We find that routers Amsterdam and Vienna are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Amsterdam,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Amsterdam,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Prague (Vienna,set-static,Prague). Task4: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Barcelona (Vienna,set-static,Barcelona). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Warsaw to 300 on router Budapest (Budapest,set-localpre,Warsaw). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Amsterdam and Vienna. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich-Vienna) OSPF2:(Prague-Budapest) OSPF3:(Brussels-Madrid-Vienna) OSPF4:(Barcelona-Budapest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.118.0/24 and N2: 198.56.105.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Berlin-Munich-Vienna-Prague-Budapest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Brussels-Madrid-Vienna-Barcelona-Budapest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Munich. We find that routers Paris and Munich are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Paris,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Rome (Munich,set-static,Rome). Task4: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (Munich,set-static,Madrid). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Paris and Munich. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich) OSPF2:(Brussels-Munich).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.119.0/24 and N2: 198.57.106.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Paris-Berlin-Munich-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Paris-Brussels-Munich-Madrid] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Atlanta. We find that routers SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Denver (SanFrancisco,set-static,Denver). Task2: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Seattle (SanFrancisco,set-static,Seattle). Task3: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router NewYork (Chicago,set-static,NewYork). Task4: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Dallas (Chicago,set-static,Dallas). Task5: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Philadelphia (Boston,set-static,Philadelphia). Task6: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Detroit (Boston,set-static,Detroit). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston. OSPF1:(Denver-Chicago) OSPF2:(NewYork-Boston) OSPF3:(Philadelphia-Atlanta) OSPF4:(Seattle-Dallas-Chicago) OSPF5:(Detroit-Atlanta).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.120.0/24 and N2: 198.58.107.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Denver-Chicago-NewYork-Boston-Philadelphia-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Seattle-Dallas-Chicago-Boston-Detroit-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Bucharest. We find that routers London and Berlin are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Amsterdam (London,set-static,Amsterdam). Task3: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Bucharest (Berlin,set-static,Bucharest). Task4: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Munich (Berlin,set-static,Munich). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Berlin. OSPF1:(Paris-Brussels-Berlin) OSPF2:(Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin) OSPF3:(Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.121.0/24 and N2: 198.59.108.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Brussels-Berlin-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin-Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination LosAngeles. We find that routers Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Orlando (Miami,set-static,Orlando). Task2: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Tampa (Miami,set-static,Tampa). Task3: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Nashville (Atlanta,set-static,Nashville). Task4: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Houston (Atlanta,set-static,Houston). Task5: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Phoenix (Dallas,set-static,Phoenix). Task6: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router SanDiego (Dallas,set-static,SanDiego). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas. OSPF1:(Orlando-Atlanta) OSPF2:(Nashville-Dallas) OSPF3:(Tampa-Atlanta) OSPF5:(Houston-Dallas) .

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.124.0/24 and N2: 198.62.111.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Nashville-Dallas-Phoenix] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Miami-Tampa-Atlanta-Houston-Dallas-SanDiego] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination E. We find that only router A is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N1:192.1.12.0/24 with the next hop as router B (A,set-static,B). Task2: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N2:192.1.13.0/24 with the next hop as router K (A,set-static,K). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from D to 300 on router E (E,set-localpre,D). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node A as starting points.. OSPF1:(B-C-E) OSPF2:(K-F-E).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 192.1.12.0/24 and N2: 192.1.13.0/24. I want the traffic in the router network destined for N1 to follow the path [A-B-C-E] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [A-K-F-E] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that only router London is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.51.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (London,set-static,Madrid). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node London as starting points.OSPF1: (Paris-Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Madrid-Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.51.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Madrid-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that routers London and Paris are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task3: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task4: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Dublin (Paris,set-static,Dublin). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Paris as starting points. OSPF1: (Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 207.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.50.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Paris-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Sapporo. We find that routers Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task2: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task3: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Kyoto (Osaka,set-static,Kyoto). Task4: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Hiroshima (Osaka,set-static,Hiroshima). Task5: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Fukuoka (Nagoya,set-static,Fukuoka). Task6: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Kobe (Nagoya,set-static,Kobe). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Yokohama to 300 on router Sapporo (Sapporo,set-localpre,Yokohama). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya as starting points. OSPF1: (Kyoto-Nagoya) OSPF2: (Fukuoka-Sapporo) OSPF3: (Hiroshima-Nagoya) OSPF4: (Kobe-Sapporo).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.115.0/24 and N2: 198.53.102.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Kyoto-Nagoya-Fukuoka-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Hiroshima-Nagoya-Kobe-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Darwin. We find that routers Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task2: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task3: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Brisbane (Melbourne,set-static,Brisbane). Task4: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Hobart (Melbourne,set-static,Hobart). Task5: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Adelaide (Perth,set-static,Adelaide). Task6: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Cairns (Perth,set-static,Cairns). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Canberra to 300 on router Darwin (Darwin,set-localpre,Canberra). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth as starting points. OSPF1: (Brisbane-Perth) OSPF2: (Adelaide-Darwin) OSPF3: (Hobart-Perth) OSPF4: (Cairns-Darwin).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.116.0/24 and N2: 198.54.103.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth-Adelaide-Darwin] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Hobart-Perth-Cairns-Darwin] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Wuhan. We find that routers Beijing and Guangzhou are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shanghai (Beijing,set-static,Shanghai). Task2: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Tianjin (Beijing,set-static,Tianjin). Task3: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shenzhen (Guangzhou,set-static,Shenzhen). Task4: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Nanjing (Guangzhou,set-static,Nanjing). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Chengdu to 300 on router Wuhan (Wuhan,set-localpre,Chengdu). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Beijing and Guangzhou. OSPF1:(Shanghai-Guangzhou) OSPF2:(Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan) OSPF3:(Tianjin-Guangzhou) OSPF4:(Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.117.0/24 and N2: 198.55.104.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Beijing-Shanghai-Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Beijing-Tianjin-Guangzhou-Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Budapest. We find that routers Amsterdam and Vienna are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Amsterdam,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Amsterdam,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Prague (Vienna,set-static,Prague). Task4: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Barcelona (Vienna,set-static,Barcelona). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Warsaw to 300 on router Budapest (Budapest,set-localpre,Warsaw). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Amsterdam and Vienna. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich-Vienna) OSPF2:(Prague-Budapest) OSPF3:(Brussels-Madrid-Vienna) OSPF4:(Barcelona-Budapest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.118.0/24 and N2: 198.56.105.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Berlin-Munich-Vienna-Prague-Budapest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Brussels-Madrid-Vienna-Barcelona-Budapest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Munich. We find that routers Paris and Munich are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Paris,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Rome (Munich,set-static,Rome). Task4: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (Munich,set-static,Madrid). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Paris and Munich. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich) OSPF2:(Brussels-Munich).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.119.0/24 and N2: 198.57.106.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Paris-Berlin-Munich-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Paris-Brussels-Munich-Madrid] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Atlanta. We find that routers SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Denver (SanFrancisco,set-static,Denver). Task2: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Seattle (SanFrancisco,set-static,Seattle). Task3: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router NewYork (Chicago,set-static,NewYork). Task4: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Dallas (Chicago,set-static,Dallas). Task5: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Philadelphia (Boston,set-static,Philadelphia). Task6: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Detroit (Boston,set-static,Detroit). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston. OSPF1:(Denver-Chicago) OSPF2:(NewYork-Boston) OSPF3:(Philadelphia-Atlanta) OSPF4:(Seattle-Dallas-Chicago) OSPF5:(Detroit-Atlanta).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.120.0/24 and N2: 198.58.107.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Denver-Chicago-NewYork-Boston-Philadelphia-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Seattle-Dallas-Chicago-Boston-Detroit-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Bucharest. We find that routers London and Berlin are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Amsterdam (London,set-static,Amsterdam). Task3: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Bucharest (Berlin,set-static,Bucharest). Task4: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Munich (Berlin,set-static,Munich). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Berlin. OSPF1:(Paris-Brussels-Berlin) OSPF2:(Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin) OSPF3:(Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.121.0/24 and N2: 198.59.108.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Brussels-Berlin-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin-Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination LosAngeles. We find that routers Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Orlando (Miami,set-static,Orlando). Task2: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Tampa (Miami,set-static,Tampa). Task3: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Nashville (Atlanta,set-static,Nashville). Task4: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Houston (Atlanta,set-static,Houston). Task5: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Phoenix (Dallas,set-static,Phoenix). Task6: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router SanDiego (Dallas,set-static,SanDiego). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas. OSPF1:(Orlando-Atlanta) OSPF2:(Nashville-Dallas) OSPF3:(Tampa-Atlanta) OSPF5:(Houston-Dallas) .

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.124.0/24 and N2: 198.62.111.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Nashville-Dallas-Phoenix] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Miami-Tampa-Atlanta-Houston-Dallas-SanDiego] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination E. We find that only router A is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N1:192.1.12.0/24 with the next hop as router B (A,set-static,B). Task2: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N2:192.1.13.0/24 with the next hop as router K (A,set-static,K). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from D to 300 on router E (E,set-localpre,D). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node A as starting points.. OSPF1:(B-C-E) OSPF2:(K-F-E).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 192.1.12.0/24 and N2: 192.1.13.0/24. I want the traffic in the router network destined for N1 to follow the path [A-B-C-E] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [A-K-F-E] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that only router London is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.51.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (London,set-static,Madrid). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node London as starting points.OSPF1: (Paris-Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Madrid-Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.51.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Madrid-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that routers London and Paris are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task3: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task4: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Dublin (Paris,set-static,Dublin). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Paris as starting points. OSPF1: (Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 207.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.50.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Paris-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Sapporo. We find that routers Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task2: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task3: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Kyoto (Osaka,set-static,Kyoto). Task4: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Hiroshima (Osaka,set-static,Hiroshima). Task5: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Fukuoka (Nagoya,set-static,Fukuoka). Task6: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Kobe (Nagoya,set-static,Kobe). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Yokohama to 300 on router Sapporo (Sapporo,set-localpre,Yokohama). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya as starting points. OSPF1: (Kyoto-Nagoya) OSPF2: (Fukuoka-Sapporo) OSPF3: (Hiroshima-Nagoya) OSPF4: (Kobe-Sapporo).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.115.0/24 and N2: 198.53.102.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Kyoto-Nagoya-Fukuoka-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Hiroshima-Nagoya-Kobe-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Darwin. We find that routers Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task2: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task3: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Brisbane (Melbourne,set-static,Brisbane). Task4: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Hobart (Melbourne,set-static,Hobart). Task5: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Adelaide (Perth,set-static,Adelaide). Task6: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Cairns (Perth,set-static,Cairns). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Canberra to 300 on router Darwin (Darwin,set-localpre,Canberra). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth as starting points. OSPF1: (Brisbane-Perth) OSPF2: (Adelaide-Darwin) OSPF3: (Hobart-Perth) OSPF4: (Cairns-Darwin).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.116.0/24 and N2: 198.54.103.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth-Adelaide-Darwin] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Hobart-Perth-Cairns-Darwin] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Wuhan. We find that routers Beijing and Guangzhou are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shanghai (Beijing,set-static,Shanghai). Task2: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Tianjin (Beijing,set-static,Tianjin). Task3: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shenzhen (Guangzhou,set-static,Shenzhen). Task4: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Nanjing (Guangzhou,set-static,Nanjing). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Chengdu to 300 on router Wuhan (Wuhan,set-localpre,Chengdu). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Beijing and Guangzhou. OSPF1:(Shanghai-Guangzhou) OSPF2:(Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan) OSPF3:(Tianjin-Guangzhou) OSPF4:(Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.117.0/24 and N2: 198.55.104.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Beijing-Shanghai-Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Beijing-Tianjin-Guangzhou-Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Budapest. We find that routers Amsterdam and Vienna are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Amsterdam,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Amsterdam,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Prague (Vienna,set-static,Prague). Task4: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Barcelona (Vienna,set-static,Barcelona). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Warsaw to 300 on router Budapest (Budapest,set-localpre,Warsaw). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Amsterdam and Vienna. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich-Vienna) OSPF2:(Prague-Budapest) OSPF3:(Brussels-Madrid-Vienna) OSPF4:(Barcelona-Budapest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.118.0/24 and N2: 198.56.105.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Berlin-Munich-Vienna-Prague-Budapest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Brussels-Madrid-Vienna-Barcelona-Budapest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Munich. We find that routers Paris and Munich are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Paris,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Rome (Munich,set-static,Rome). Task4: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (Munich,set-static,Madrid). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Paris and Munich. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich) OSPF2:(Brussels-Munich).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.119.0/24 and N2: 198.57.106.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Paris-Berlin-Munich-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Paris-Brussels-Munich-Madrid] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Atlanta. We find that routers SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Denver (SanFrancisco,set-static,Denver). Task2: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Seattle (SanFrancisco,set-static,Seattle). Task3: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router NewYork (Chicago,set-static,NewYork). Task4: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Dallas (Chicago,set-static,Dallas). Task5: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Philadelphia (Boston,set-static,Philadelphia). Task6: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Detroit (Boston,set-static,Detroit). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston. OSPF1:(Denver-Chicago) OSPF2:(NewYork-Boston) OSPF3:(Philadelphia-Atlanta) OSPF4:(Seattle-Dallas-Chicago) OSPF5:(Detroit-Atlanta).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.120.0/24 and N2: 198.58.107.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Denver-Chicago-NewYork-Boston-Philadelphia-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Seattle-Dallas-Chicago-Boston-Detroit-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Bucharest. We find that routers London and Berlin are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Amsterdam (London,set-static,Amsterdam). Task3: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Bucharest (Berlin,set-static,Bucharest). Task4: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Munich (Berlin,set-static,Munich). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Berlin. OSPF1:(Paris-Brussels-Berlin) OSPF2:(Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin) OSPF3:(Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.121.0/24 and N2: 198.59.108.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Brussels-Berlin-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin-Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination LosAngeles. We find that routers Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Orlando (Miami,set-static,Orlando). Task2: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Tampa (Miami,set-static,Tampa). Task3: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Nashville (Atlanta,set-static,Nashville). Task4: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Houston (Atlanta,set-static,Houston). Task5: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Phoenix (Dallas,set-static,Phoenix). Task6: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router SanDiego (Dallas,set-static,SanDiego). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas. OSPF1:(Orlando-Atlanta) OSPF2:(Nashville-Dallas) OSPF3:(Tampa-Atlanta) OSPF5:(Houston-Dallas) .

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.124.0/24 and N2: 198.62.111.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Nashville-Dallas-Phoenix] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Miami-Tampa-Atlanta-Houston-Dallas-SanDiego] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination E. We find that only router A is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N1:192.1.12.0/24 with the next hop as router B (A,set-static,B). Task2: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N2:192.1.13.0/24 with the next hop as router K (A,set-static,K). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from D to 300 on router E (E,set-localpre,D). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node A as starting points.. OSPF1:(B-C-E) OSPF2:(K-F-E).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 192.1.12.0/24 and N2: 192.1.13.0/24. I want the traffic in the router network destined for N1 to follow the path [A-B-C-E] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [A-K-F-E] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that only router London is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.51.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (London,set-static,Madrid). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node London as starting points.OSPF1: (Paris-Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Madrid-Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.51.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Madrid-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that routers London and Paris are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task3: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task4: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Dublin (Paris,set-static,Dublin). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Paris as starting points. OSPF1: (Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 207.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.50.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Paris-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Sapporo. We find that routers Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task2: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task3: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Kyoto (Osaka,set-static,Kyoto). Task4: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Hiroshima (Osaka,set-static,Hiroshima). Task5: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Fukuoka (Nagoya,set-static,Fukuoka). Task6: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Kobe (Nagoya,set-static,Kobe). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Yokohama to 300 on router Sapporo (Sapporo,set-localpre,Yokohama). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya as starting points. OSPF1: (Kyoto-Nagoya) OSPF2: (Fukuoka-Sapporo) OSPF3: (Hiroshima-Nagoya) OSPF4: (Kobe-Sapporo).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.115.0/24 and N2: 198.53.102.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Kyoto-Nagoya-Fukuoka-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Hiroshima-Nagoya-Kobe-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Darwin. We find that routers Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task2: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task3: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Brisbane (Melbourne,set-static,Brisbane). Task4: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Hobart (Melbourne,set-static,Hobart). Task5: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Adelaide (Perth,set-static,Adelaide). Task6: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Cairns (Perth,set-static,Cairns). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Canberra to 300 on router Darwin (Darwin,set-localpre,Canberra). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth as starting points. OSPF1: (Brisbane-Perth) OSPF2: (Adelaide-Darwin) OSPF3: (Hobart-Perth) OSPF4: (Cairns-Darwin).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.116.0/24 and N2: 198.54.103.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth-Adelaide-Darwin] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Hobart-Perth-Cairns-Darwin] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Wuhan. We find that routers Beijing and Guangzhou are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shanghai (Beijing,set-static,Shanghai). Task2: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Tianjin (Beijing,set-static,Tianjin). Task3: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shenzhen (Guangzhou,set-static,Shenzhen). Task4: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Nanjing (Guangzhou,set-static,Nanjing). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Chengdu to 300 on router Wuhan (Wuhan,set-localpre,Chengdu). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Beijing and Guangzhou. OSPF1:(Shanghai-Guangzhou) OSPF2:(Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan) OSPF3:(Tianjin-Guangzhou) OSPF4:(Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.117.0/24 and N2: 198.55.104.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Beijing-Shanghai-Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Beijing-Tianjin-Guangzhou-Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Budapest. We find that routers Amsterdam and Vienna are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Amsterdam,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Amsterdam,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Prague (Vienna,set-static,Prague). Task4: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Barcelona (Vienna,set-static,Barcelona). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Warsaw to 300 on router Budapest (Budapest,set-localpre,Warsaw). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Amsterdam and Vienna. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich-Vienna) OSPF2:(Prague-Budapest) OSPF3:(Brussels-Madrid-Vienna) OSPF4:(Barcelona-Budapest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.118.0/24 and N2: 198.56.105.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Berlin-Munich-Vienna-Prague-Budapest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Brussels-Madrid-Vienna-Barcelona-Budapest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Munich. We find that routers Paris and Munich are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Paris,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Rome (Munich,set-static,Rome). Task4: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (Munich,set-static,Madrid). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Paris and Munich. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich) OSPF2:(Brussels-Munich).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.119.0/24 and N2: 198.57.106.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Paris-Berlin-Munich-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Paris-Brussels-Munich-Madrid] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Atlanta. We find that routers SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Denver (SanFrancisco,set-static,Denver). Task2: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Seattle (SanFrancisco,set-static,Seattle). Task3: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router NewYork (Chicago,set-static,NewYork). Task4: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Dallas (Chicago,set-static,Dallas). Task5: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Philadelphia (Boston,set-static,Philadelphia). Task6: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Detroit (Boston,set-static,Detroit). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston. OSPF1:(Denver-Chicago) OSPF2:(NewYork-Boston) OSPF3:(Philadelphia-Atlanta) OSPF4:(Seattle-Dallas-Chicago) OSPF5:(Detroit-Atlanta).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.120.0/24 and N2: 198.58.107.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Denver-Chicago-NewYork-Boston-Philadelphia-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Seattle-Dallas-Chicago-Boston-Detroit-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Bucharest. We find that routers London and Berlin are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Amsterdam (London,set-static,Amsterdam). Task3: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Bucharest (Berlin,set-static,Bucharest). Task4: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Munich (Berlin,set-static,Munich). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Berlin. OSPF1:(Paris-Brussels-Berlin) OSPF2:(Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin) OSPF3:(Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.121.0/24 and N2: 198.59.108.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Brussels-Berlin-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin-Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination LosAngeles. We find that routers Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Orlando (Miami,set-static,Orlando). Task2: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Tampa (Miami,set-static,Tampa). Task3: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Nashville (Atlanta,set-static,Nashville). Task4: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Houston (Atlanta,set-static,Houston). Task5: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Phoenix (Dallas,set-static,Phoenix). Task6: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router SanDiego (Dallas,set-static,SanDiego). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas. OSPF1:(Orlando-Atlanta) OSPF2:(Nashville-Dallas) OSPF3:(Tampa-Atlanta) OSPF5:(Houston-Dallas) .

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.124.0/24 and N2: 198.62.111.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Nashville-Dallas-Phoenix] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Miami-Tampa-Atlanta-Houston-Dallas-SanDiego] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination E. We find that only router A is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N1:192.1.12.0/24 with the next hop as router B (A,set-static,B). Task2: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N2:192.1.13.0/24 with the next hop as router K (A,set-static,K). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from D to 300 on router E (E,set-localpre,D). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node A as starting points.. OSPF1:(B-C-E) OSPF2:(K-F-E).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 192.1.12.0/24 and N2: 192.1.13.0/24. I want the traffic in the router network destined for N1 to follow the path [A-B-C-E] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [A-K-F-E] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that only router London is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.51.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (London,set-static,Madrid). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node London as starting points.OSPF1: (Paris-Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Madrid-Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.51.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Madrid-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Rome. We find that routers London and Paris are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task3: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:207.0.113.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task4: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.50.100.0/24 with the next hop as router Dublin (Paris,set-static,Dublin). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Tokyo to 300 on router Rome (Rome,set-localpre,Tokyo). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Paris as starting points. OSPF1: (Berlin-Rome) OSPF2: (Dublin-Rome).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 207.0.113.0/24 and N2: 198.50.100.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Berlin-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Paris-Dublin-Rome] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Sapporo. We find that routers Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task2: Configure a static route on router Tokyo for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Osaka (Tokyo,set-static,Osaka). Task3: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Kyoto (Osaka,set-static,Kyoto). Task4: Configure a static route on router Osaka for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Hiroshima (Osaka,set-static,Hiroshima). Task5: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N1:203.0.115.0/24 with the next hop as router Fukuoka (Nagoya,set-static,Fukuoka). Task6: Configure a static route on router Nagoya for the IP prefix N2:198.53.102.0/24 with the next hop as router Kobe (Nagoya,set-static,Kobe). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Yokohama to 300 on router Sapporo (Sapporo,set-localpre,Yokohama). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Tokyo, Osaka, and Nagoya as starting points. OSPF1: (Kyoto-Nagoya) OSPF2: (Fukuoka-Sapporo) OSPF3: (Hiroshima-Nagoya) OSPF4: (Kobe-Sapporo).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.115.0/24 and N2: 198.53.102.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Kyoto-Nagoya-Fukuoka-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Tokyo-Osaka-Hiroshima-Nagoya-Kobe-Sapporo] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Darwin. We find that routers Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task2: Configure a static route on router Sydney for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Melbourne (Sydney,set-static,Melbourne). Task3: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Brisbane (Melbourne,set-static,Brisbane). Task4: Configure a static route on router Melbourne for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Hobart (Melbourne,set-static,Hobart). Task5: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N1:203.0.116.0/24 with the next hop as router Adelaide (Perth,set-static,Adelaide). Task6: Configure a static route on router Perth for the IP prefix N2:198.54.103.0/24 with the next hop as router Cairns (Perth,set-static,Cairns). Task7: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Canberra to 300 on router Darwin (Darwin,set-localpre,Canberra). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Sydney, Melbourne, and Perth as starting points. OSPF1: (Brisbane-Perth) OSPF2: (Adelaide-Darwin) OSPF3: (Hobart-Perth) OSPF4: (Cairns-Darwin).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.116.0/24 and N2: 198.54.103.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Brisbane-Perth-Adelaide-Darwin] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Sydney-Melbourne-Hobart-Perth-Cairns-Darwin] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Wuhan. We find that routers Beijing and Guangzhou are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shanghai (Beijing,set-static,Shanghai). Task2: Configure a static route on router Beijing for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Tianjin (Beijing,set-static,Tianjin). Task3: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N1:203.0.117.0/24 with the next hop as router Shenzhen (Guangzhou,set-static,Shenzhen). Task4: Configure a static route on router Guangzhou for the IP prefix N2:198.55.104.0/24 with the next hop as router Nanjing (Guangzhou,set-static,Nanjing). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Chengdu to 300 on router Wuhan (Wuhan,set-localpre,Chengdu). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Beijing and Guangzhou. OSPF1:(Shanghai-Guangzhou) OSPF2:(Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan) OSPF3:(Tianjin-Guangzhou) OSPF4:(Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.117.0/24 and N2: 198.55.104.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Beijing-Shanghai-Guangzhou-Shenzhen-Hangzhou-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Beijing-Tianjin-Guangzhou-Nanjing-Hefei-Wuhan] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Budapest. We find that routers Amsterdam and Vienna are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Amsterdam,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Amsterdam for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Amsterdam,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N1:203.0.118.0/24 with the next hop as router Prague (Vienna,set-static,Prague). Task4: Configure a static route on router Vienna for the IP prefix N2:198.56.105.0/24 with the next hop as router Barcelona (Vienna,set-static,Barcelona). Task5: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from Warsaw to 300 on router Budapest (Budapest,set-localpre,Warsaw). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Amsterdam and Vienna. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich-Vienna) OSPF2:(Prague-Budapest) OSPF3:(Brussels-Madrid-Vienna) OSPF4:(Barcelona-Budapest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.118.0/24 and N2: 198.56.105.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Berlin-Munich-Vienna-Prague-Budapest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Amsterdam-Brussels-Madrid-Vienna-Barcelona-Budapest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Munich. We find that routers Paris and Munich are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Berlin (Paris,set-static,Berlin). Task2: Configure a static route on router Paris for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Brussels (Paris,set-static,Brussels). Task3: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N1:203.0.119.0/24 with the next hop as router Rome (Munich,set-static,Rome). Task4: Configure a static route on router Munich for the IP prefix N2:198.57.106.0/24 with the next hop as router Madrid (Munich,set-static,Madrid). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Paris and Munich. OSPF1:(Berlin-Munich) OSPF2:(Brussels-Munich).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.119.0/24 and N2: 198.57.106.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Paris-Berlin-Munich-Rome] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Paris-Brussels-Munich-Madrid] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Atlanta. We find that routers SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Denver (SanFrancisco,set-static,Denver). Task2: Configure a static route on router SanFrancisco for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Seattle (SanFrancisco,set-static,Seattle). Task3: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router NewYork (Chicago,set-static,NewYork). Task4: Configure a static route on router Chicago for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Dallas (Chicago,set-static,Dallas). Task5: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N1:203.0.120.0/24 with the next hop as router Philadelphia (Boston,set-static,Philadelphia). Task6: Configure a static route on router Boston for the IP prefix N2:198.58.107.0/24 with the next hop as router Detroit (Boston,set-static,Detroit). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes SanFrancisco, Chicago, and Boston. OSPF1:(Denver-Chicago) OSPF2:(NewYork-Boston) OSPF3:(Philadelphia-Atlanta) OSPF4:(Seattle-Dallas-Chicago) OSPF5:(Detroit-Atlanta).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.120.0/24 and N2: 198.58.107.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Denver-Chicago-NewYork-Boston-Philadelphia-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [SanFrancisco-Seattle-Dallas-Chicago-Boston-Detroit-Atlanta] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination Bucharest. We find that routers London and Berlin are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Paris (London,set-static,Paris). Task2: Configure a static route on router London for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Amsterdam (London,set-static,Amsterdam). Task3: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N1:203.0.121.0/24 with the next hop as router Bucharest (Berlin,set-static,Bucharest). Task4: Configure a static route on router Berlin for the IP prefix N2:198.59.108.0/24 with the next hop as router Munich (Berlin,set-static,Munich). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes London and Berlin. OSPF1:(Paris-Brussels-Berlin) OSPF2:(Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin) OSPF3:(Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.121.0/24 and N2: 198.59.108.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [London-Paris-Brussels-Berlin-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [London-Amsterdam-Prague-Berlin-Munich-Belgrade-Bucharest] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination LosAngeles. We find that routers Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas are common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Orlando (Miami,set-static,Orlando). Task2: Configure a static route on router Miami for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Tampa (Miami,set-static,Tampa). Task3: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Nashville (Atlanta,set-static,Nashville). Task4: Configure a static route on router Atlanta for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router Houston (Atlanta,set-static,Houston). Task5: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N1:203.0.124.0/24 with the next hop as router Phoenix (Dallas,set-static,Phoenix). Task6: Configure a static route on router Dallas for the IP prefix N2:198.62.111.0/24 with the next hop as router SanDiego (Dallas,set-static,SanDiego). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common nodes Miami, Atlanta, and Dallas. OSPF1:(Orlando-Atlanta) OSPF2:(Nashville-Dallas) OSPF3:(Tampa-Atlanta) OSPF5:(Houston-Dallas) .

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 203.0.124.0/24 and N2: 198.62.111.0/24. I want the traffic destined for N1 to follow the path [Miami-Orlando-Atlanta-Nashville-Dallas-Phoenix] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [Miami-Tampa-Atlanta-Houston-Dallas-SanDiego] to reach the destination AS.

Based on the propagation paths, we first identify the common nodes in the paths, excluding the destination E. We find that only router A is common. Therefore, we have the following tasks: Task1: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N1:192.1.12.0/24 with the next hop as router B (A,set-static,B). Task2: Configure a static route on router A for the IP prefix N2:192.1.13.0/24 with the next hop as router K (A,set-static,K). Task3: Set the local-preference value for the routes coming from D to 300 on router E (E,set-localpre,D). After that, add the remaining sub-paths in each path with relevant constraints, making sure not to use the previously common node A as starting points.. OSPF1:(B-C-E) OSPF2:(K-F-E).

I have two destination networks with IP prefixes N1: 192.1.12.0/24 and N2: 192.1.13.0/24. I want the traffic in the router network destined for N1 to follow the path [A-B-C-E] to reach the destination AS, and the traffic destined for N2 to follow the path [A-K-F-E] to reach the destination AS.