text
stringlengths 0
89.3k
|
---|
Nonrigid StructurefromMotion Temporallysmooth Procrustean Alignment |
and Spatiallyvariant Deformation Modeling |
Jiawei Shi Hui Deng Yuchao Dai |
School of Electronics and Information Northwestern Polytechnical University |
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Information Acquisition and Processing |
sjw2018 denghui986 mailnwpueducn daiyuchaonwpueducn |
Abstract |
Even though Nonrigid StructurefromMotion NRSfM |
has been extensively studied and great progress has been |
made there are still key challenges that hinder their broad |
realworld applications 1 the inherent motionrotation |
ambiguity requires either explicit camera motion recovery |
with extra constraint or complex Procrustean Alignment 2 |
existing lowrank modeling of the global shape can over |
penalize drastic deformations in the 3D shape sequence |
This paper proposes to resolve the above issues from a |
spatialtemporal modeling perspective First we propose |
a novel Temporallysmooth Procrustean Alignment module |
that estimates 3D deforming shapes and adjusts the cam |
era motion by aligning the 3D shape sequence consecu |
tively Our new alignment module remedies the requirement |
of complex reference 3D shape during alignment which |
is more conductive to nonisotropic deformation modeling |
Second we propose a spatialweighted approach to enforce |
thelowrank constraint adaptively at different locations to |
accommodate drastic spatiallyvariant deformation recon |
struction better Our modeling outperform existing low |
rank based methods and extensive experiments across dif |
ferent datasets validate the effectiveness of our method1 |
1 Introduction |
Nonrigid structurefrommotion NRSfM targets at jointly |
estimating the deforming 3D shapes and the camera mo |
tion from the 2D observation sequence which is a classi |
cal and longlasting geometric vision problem 8 In con |
trast to the recently booming deep learning based solutions |
14 24 25 34 42 48 the optimization based solutions do |
not rely on training data and can be directly applied to arbi |
trary classes such as human animal and deforming surface |
Even though considerable progress has been made 11 and |
Yuchao Dai is the corresponding author |
1Project page httpsnpucvrgithubioTSMNRSfM |
212 1 ˆ 1 iik iki Fk K ci G R 1 3 T |
kk rank k K GG Camera Pose World |
CoordinateiSa |
iRCamera Motion |
b |
c |
World |
Coordinate |
1iRiR |
Temporallysmooth |
Alignment iQ2 |
1 1 min |
iii iiFQQS QSTPA |
Camera |
CoordinateiX |
Mean Shape |
X |
2min |
iiiT |
iiiiss RtXRX t1 XiRProcrustean |
Alignment |
GPAProcrustean AlignmentCamera MotionFigure 1 Overview of our proposed TPA Module a Cam |
era motion can be recovered by orthographic and rank3 con |
straints within the matrix factorization framework11 c The |
Procrustean alignment framework uses GPA to resolve the rota |
tion ambiguity b We propose the TPA module which aligns the |
3D shapes of consecutive frames and corrects the camera motion |
by the temporal smoothing property |
a series of milestones have been achieved 1 27 30 49 the |
performance of NRSfM is still far from satisfactory The |
challenges mainly lie in 1 the inherent motionrotation am |
biguity requires either explicit camera motion recovery with |
extra constraint or complex Procrustean Alignment 2 ex |
isting global modeling ie lowrank 11 26 27 unionof |
subspace 28 49 of the deforming 3D shape cannot handle |
drastic spatiallyvariant 3D deformations |
Existing NRSfM statistical prior frameworks can be |
roughly classified into two categories 1 explicit motion |
estimationbased approaches 2 8 11 15 26 27 and 2 |
motion estimationfree approaches 30 31 41 The for |
mer usually employs the matrix factorization frameworkarXiv240504309v1 csCV 7 May 2024and orthographic constraint to solve for camera motion and |
3D shapes separately Dai et al 11 introduced the low |
rank constraint into the recovery of camera motion Ku |
mar et al dig into the correction matrix to improve the |
motion estimation results by using the smoothing prior of |
camera motions 26 or the fusion of different camera mo |
tion sequences 27 However these camera motion estima |
tion methods have difficulties in tackling the inherent rota |
tionmotion ambiguity problem in NRSfM 47 |
The latter solves the shapes directly and remedies the |
requirement of motion estimation Lee et al 30 31 41 |
argued that nonrigid shapes can be recovered unambigu |
ously under the coordinate with almost no rigid relative |
motion This type of framework resolves the rotation am |
biguity through General Procrustean Analysis GPA 18 |
to achieve alignment of the 3D shapes However the |
high dependence on the alignment reference shape makes |
the model extremely complex 30 41 and tends to over |
penalize nonisotropic deformations |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
README.md exists but content is empty.
Use the Edit dataset card button to edit it.
- Downloads last month
- 36