File size: 5,985 Bytes
22433f6 d63bad1 22433f6 d63bad1 0aae9b8 d63bad1 0aae9b8 d63bad1 0aae9b8 d63bad1 0aae9b8 d63bad1 0aae9b8 d63bad1 0aae9b8 d63bad1 0aae9b8 d63bad1 22433f6 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 |
---
dataset_info:
features:
- name: Claim
dtype: string
- name: Context
dtype: string
- name: Source
dtype: string
- name: Source Indices
dtype: string
- name: Relation
dtype: string
- name: Relation Indices
dtype: string
- name: Target
dtype: string
- name: Target Indices
dtype: string
- name: Inconsistent Claim Component
dtype: string
- name: Inconsistent Context-Span
dtype: string
- name: Inconsistent Context-Span Indices
dtype: string
- name: Inconsistency Type
dtype: string
- name: Fine-grained Inconsistent Entity-Type
dtype: string
- name: Coarse Inconsistent Entity-Type
dtype: string
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 2657091
num_examples: 6443
- name: validation
num_bytes: 333142
num_examples: 806
- name: test
num_bytes: 332484
num_examples: 806
download_size: 1784422
dataset_size: 3322717
task_categories:
- token-classification
language:
- en
pretty_name: FICLE Dataset
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
---
# FICLE Dataset
The dataset can be loaded and utilized through the following:
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ficle_data = load_dataset("tathagataraha/ficle")
```
# Dataset card for Falcon RefinedWeb
## Dataset Description
* **GitHub Repo:** https://github.com/blitzprecision/FICLE
* **Paper:**
* **Point of Contact:**
### Dataset Summary
The FICLE dataset is a derivative of the FEVER dataset, which is a collection of 185,445 claims generated by modifying sentences obtained from Wikipedia.
These claims were then verified without knowledge of the original sentences they were derived from. Each sample in the FEVER dataset consists of a claim sentence, a context sentence extracted from a Wikipedia URL as evidence, and a type label indicating whether the claim is supported, refuted, or lacks sufficient information.
### Languages
The FICLE Dataset contains only English.
## Dataset Structure
### Data Fields
* `Claim (string)`:
* `Context (string)`:
* `Source (string)`:
* `Source Indices (string)`:
* `Relation (string)`:
* `Relation Indices (string)`:
* `Target (string)`:
* `Target Indices (string)`:
* `Inconsistent Claim Component (string)`:
* `Inconsistent Context-Span (string)`:
* `Inconsistent Context-Span Indices (string)`:
* `Inconsistency Type (string)`:
* `Fine-grained Inconsistent Entity-Type (string)`:
* `Coarse Inconsistent Entity-Type (string)`:
### Data Splits
The FICLE dataset comprises a total of 8,055 samples in the English language, each representing different instances of inconsistencies.
These inconsistencies are categorized into five types: Taxonomic Relations (4,842 samples), Negation (1,630 samples), Set Based (642 samples), Gradable (526 samples), and Simple (415 samples).
Within the dataset, there are six possible components that contribute to the inconsistencies found in the claim sentences.
These components are distributed as follows: Target-Head (3,960 samples), Target-Modifier (1,529 samples), Relation-Head (951 samples), Relation-Modifier (1,534 samples), Source-Head (45 samples), and Source-Modifier (36 samples).
The dataset is split into `train`, `validation`, and `test`.
* `train`: 6.44k rows
* `validation`: 806 rows
* `test`: 806 rows
## Dataset Creation
### Curation Rationale
We propose a linguistically enriched dataset to help detect inconsistencies and explain them.
To this end, the broad requirements are to locate where the inconsistency is present between a claim and a context and to have a classification scheme for better explainability.
### Data Collection and Preprocessing
The FICLE dataset is derived from the FEVER dataset, using the following-
ing processing steps. FEVER (Fact Extraction and VERification) consists of
185,445 claims were generated by altering sentences extracted from Wikipedia and
subsequently verified without knowledge of the sentence they were derived from.
Every sample in the FEVER dataset contains the claim sentence, evidence (or
context) sentence from a Wikipedia URL, and a type label (‘supports’, ‘refutes’, or
‘not enough info’). Out of these, we leverage only the samples with the ‘refutes’ label
to build our dataset.
### Annotations
You can see the annotation guidelines [here](https://github.com/blitzprecision/FICLE/blob/main/ficle_annotation_guidelines.pdf).
In order to provide detailed explanations for inconsistencies, extensive annotations were conducted for each sample in the FICLE dataset. The annotation process involved two iterations, with each iteration focusing on different aspects of the dataset.
In the first iteration, the annotations were primarily "syntactic-oriented." These fields included identifying the inconsistent claim fact triple, marking inconsistent context spans, and categorizing the six possible inconsistent claim components.
The second iteration of annotations concentrated on "semantic-oriented" aspects. Annotators labeled semantic fields for each sample, such as the type of inconsistency, coarse inconsistent entity types, and fine-grained inconsistent entity types.
This stage aimed to capture the semantic nuances and provide a deeper understanding of the inconsistencies present in the dataset.
The annotation process was carried out by a group of four annotators, two of whom are also authors of the dataset. The annotators possess a strong command of the English language and hold Bachelor's degrees in Computer Science, specializing in computational linguistics.
Their expertise in the field ensured accurate and reliable annotations. The annotators' ages range from 20 to 22 years, indicating their familiarity with contemporary language usage and computational linguistic concepts.
### Personal and Sensitive Information
## Considerations for Using the Data
### Social Impact of Dataset
### Discussion of Biases
### Other Known Limitations
## Additional Information
### Citation Information
### Contact
|