Opinion ID: 877465
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 33

Heading: Petitioner's claim regarding Nank's testimony concerning his conversations with law enforcement officials was rejected in Coleman I, 579 P.2d at 749.

Text: J. Petitioner's claim regarding restricted cross-examination was rejected in Coleman I, 579 P.2d at 747. L. Petitioner's claim concerning the admission into evidence of Exhibit No. 60 was rejected in Coleman I, 579 P.2d at 752. M. Petitioner's claim in connection with his attempted cross-examination of witness Hippard was rejected in Coleman I, 579 P.2d at 747. N. Petitioner's contention regarding evidence of the height and fall of the water in the Yellowstone River at the scene of the crime was resolved against him in Coleman I, 579 P.2d at 753. P. Petitioner's contention with respect to Instruction No. 22 was ruled on in Coleman I, 579 P.2d at 749. It was again considered in light of Sandstrom v. Montana, in Coleman II, 605 P.2d at 1052-4, cert. denied, 446 U.S. 970, 100 S.Ct. 2952, 64 L.Ed.2d 831. R. Petitioner's offered Instruction No. 14 was determined to have been properly refused in Coleman I, 579 P.2d at 750. S. Petitioner's claim involving Instruction No. 16 was rejected by the Montana Supreme Court in Coleman I, 579 P.2d at 750. T. Petitioner's claim that his offered Instruction No. 35A should have been given was considered and rejected in Coleman I, 579 P.2d at 750-1.