Opinion ID: 297243
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: (Urged by all three defendants.) Error in refusing a continuance of trial.

Text: 5 II. (Urged by Mirenda and Fragoso.) Error in the court's order as to the interview of the informer by counsel for defendants; and in government counsel's implementation of the order. 6 III. (Urged by Fragoso.) Error in the court's refusal to permit Fragoso to reopen his case for the impeachment of an informer. 7 IV. (Urged by Mirenda and Medina.) Lack of proof by government there was no presentment for inspection of marijuana involved. 8 V. (Urged by Medina.) Error in allowing proof of money found on Medina at time of arrest. 9 VI. (Urged by Mirenda and Medina.) Error in admission of telephone records, without a sufficient foundation. 10 VII. (Urged by Medina.) Error in refusal to give offered instruction 5, on the credibility of witnesses. 11