Opinion ID: 2996320
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: conclusion

Text: Thus, there is a dispute of material fact over whether Chyrl was stabilized at the time of her discharge. Construing the testimony in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, this conflicting testimony alone creates a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Chyrl was a threat to herself or to her husband, and hence whether she had been “stabilized” under the EMTALA. We hold that the district court’s decision to grant summary judgment was not proper. The district court’s order is REVERSED and ordered REMANDED to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. A true Copy: Teste: ________________________________ Clerk of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit USCA-02-C-0072—4-25-03