Opinion ID: 1360664
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: Renae presents the following issues: I. Whether the court abused its discretion in finding a material change in circumstances, which is not supported by substantial evidence and is contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence presented. II. Whether the court abused its discretion in finding that appellant's relocation was a material change in circumstance supporting a change of custody. III. Whether the court abused its discretion by not considering the effect of separating siblings when determining the best interest of the child for purposes of changing custody. IV. Whether the court abused its discretion by considering past relationships of appellant in granting custody of the minor child to appellee when the relationships had occurred prior to the entry of the original decree and had no present effect on the best interests of the minor child. V. Whether the court abused its discretion by not considering that appellant was the primary care giver of the minor child. Russell states the issue as follows: Did the trial court abuse its discretion by granting primary custody of the parties' minor child to the appellee?