Opinion ID: 2281968
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: TEAM's Claim for Breach of Express Warranty

Text: TEAM, like Renaissance, asserts a breach of express warranty claim against Vermeer. [17] It contends that, upon dissolution of Crush/Mo-Kan, Uhlmann assigned to TEAM his rights to Crush's breach of express warranty claims, thereby giving TEAM the right to assert such claims against Vermeer. For this claim, as for Renaissance's claim for breach of express warranty, only the element of injury was contested. To defeat summary judgment, TEAM must show that (1) Uhlmann had authority to assign the warranty claims to TEAM, (2) a valid assignment of the claims to TEAM occurred, and (3) the original holder of the claimsCrushsuffered harm through Vermeer's alleged breach.