Opinion ID: 3064948
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: We review a grant of summary judgment by the district court de novo. McDonald v. Sun Oil Co., 548 F.3d 774, 778 (9th Cir. 2008). We examine all evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, id.; Fed. R. Civ. P. 56, and “do[ ] not weigh the evidence or determine the truth of the matter, but only determine [ ] whether there is a genuine issue for trial,” Balint v. Carson City, 180 F.3d 1047, 1054 (9th Cir. 1999) (en banc). “A dispute as to a material fact is genuine if there is sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to return a verdict for the non-moving party.” Long v. County of Los Angeles, 442 F.3d 1178, 1185 (citing Anderson v. Liberty CONN v. CITY OF RENO 9593 Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986)). If such is the case, “summary judgment will not lie.” Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248.