Opinion ID: 528408
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: conclusion

Text: 67 We hold that the district court did not err in admitting the statements made by defendant Bogen as we find the statements to be admissible under Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(A). We do, however, hold that the district court erred with respect to Savarese's award of compensatory damages and we will, accordingly, vacate this award and remand the issue to the district court for a new trial. Additionally, we will vacate and remand the award for delay damages based on erroneous application of Pennsylvania law by the district court. We will affirm both the order denying the injunction barring the state court actions and the order including defendant Wolfe. Finally, we will affirm the award of attorneys fees in light of our disposition affirming defendants' liability. 68 Based on the foregoing, we will affirm, in part, and reverse in part, the judgment of the district court. 69 Four-fifths of the costs taxed against appellants and one-fifth, against Savarese.