Opinion ID: 2975726
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Right to Travel Claim

Text: Plaintiffs have asserted their constitutionally protected right to travel in two contexts: first, in support of their argument in support of their count I equal protection claim that Chapter 778 should be subjected to strict scrutiny; and second, in support of their separate count VI claim for infringement of their fundamental right to travel. As outlined above, the district court determined that plaintiffs’ claims fail to adequately allege that their right to travel is actually burdened by Chapter 778. For the same reasons that the district court properly concluded that the asserted infringement of the right to travel does not warrant strict scrutiny of Chapter 778, it also properly concluded that count VI fails to state a proper claim. We therefore uphold the district court’s dismissal of the count VI. No. 06-5306 League of United Latin Am. Citizens, Page 12 et al. v. Bredesen, et al.