Opinion ID: 1931059
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 13

Heading: Sentencing Order Preparation

Text: Wright argues that Judge Perry's standard practice was to have the State draft his trial orders. [4] There is no evidence in this case to support such a claim. The facts upon which Wright relies for this allegation come from deposition testimony that was filed in another case in which Wright was not involved. Just as a judge cannot adopt the factual findings of a trial judge in a different case involving a different defendant, Wright, 581 So.2d at 886, Wright cannot cite facts in another case to support his claim here. See, e.g., Maharaj v. State, 778 So.2d 944, 951 (Fla. 2000) (stating that postconviction relief cannot be based on actions in another case or on speculation). This claim is therefore denied.