Opinion ID: 628107
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: w.a.r.e.)

Text: Oct.Dec. Housekeeper/ 3.35/hr. 4 hrs./ laundry worker day, 5 (A.W.A.R.E. job) days/wk. 1988 Jan.Apr. Housekeeper/ 3.35 4 hrs./ laundry worker /hr. day, 5 (A.W.A.R.E. job) days/wk. Paper folder 1 cents per Short 178 (A.W.A.R.E. job) folded period paper. of time. 1989 Paper folder 1 cents per Short (A.W.A.R.E. job) folded period  paper. of time.  Oberst's yearly earnings record (R. at 219) indicates that she earned a total of $386 in 1980. Thus, obviously she worked less than forty hours per week.  We assume that Oberst worked eight hours per day on this job, even though there is little or no evidence in the record to supprt this assumption.  Oberst's yearly earnings record indicates that she had no earnings for this year. 6 See Thomas v. Sullivan, 928 F.2d 255, 259 (8th Cir.1991) ([A] treating physician's opinion is normally accorded a higher degree of deference than that of a consulting physician....); Turpin v. Bowen, 813 F.2d 165, 170-71 (8th Cir.1987) 7 McCoy v. Schweiker, 683 F.2d 1138, 1147 n. 8 (8th Cir.1982) ([T]his Court has held that as a general rule little weight is afforded to ... reports of consulting physicians who examine the claimant only on one occasion....) 8 The September 23, 1986, report is essentially a reflection of the January 14, 1985, report 9 This court has referred to the Supreme Court's language regarding substantial evidence set forth in Consolo in twelve published opinions either directly or indirectly. In two of these opinions, this court has diluted the Supreme Court's language like the majority has done in the present case. See Robinson v. Sullivan, 956 F.2d 836, 838 (8th Cir.1992); Orrick v. Sullivan, 966 F.2d 368, 371 (8th Cir.1992). In the remaining ten opinions, however, this court has applied Consolo's language regarding substantial evidence as it was intended by the Supreme Court. See Reed v. Sullivan, 988 F.2d 812, 815 (8th Cir.1993); Zahradnik v. Sullivan, 966 F.2d 355, 361 (8th Cir.1992); Browning v. Sullivan, 958 F.2d 817, 820 (8th Cir.1992); Baker v. Secretary of Health & Human Servs., 955 F.2d 552, 554 (8th Cir.1992); Russell v. Sullivan, 950 F.2d 542, 544 (8th Cir.1991); Glassman v. Sullivan, 901 F.2d 1472, 1474 (8th Cir.1990); Cruse v. Bowen, 867 F.2d 1183, 1184 (8th Cir.1989); Metcalf v. Heckler, 800 F.2d 793, 794 (8th Cir.1986); Baker v. Heckler, 730 F.2d 1147, 1150 (8th Cir.1984); Medical Center of Independence v. Harris, 628 F.2d 1113, 1117 (8th Cir.1980)