Opinion ID: 498428
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Contract award to Hugg

Text: 71 The trial court found that Western and Hugg entered into a written subcontract to survey the dirt work performed by Sanchez and to set construction stakes for the next earthmoving subcontractor, CJC, as required, Memorandum Opinion at 14, and awarded Hugg contract damages based on that provision. Western disputes the trial court's finding, but this is a straightforward factual dispute and there is evidence to support the court's decision; we will not disturb it. 24 72 Western also argues that the trial court erred in dismissing Western's claim against Hugg for negligent work done in setting stakes for the concrete subcontractor. Once again, this is a factual question, and the record includes evidence on both sides. The trial court's resolution of this conflicting testimony is not clearly erroneous.