Opinion ID: 475326
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Provocation of Flight

Text: 26 INS objects also to the restrictions in paragraph six of the injunction order which provides in part: When agents have no warrant, but intend to obtain consent upon arrival at the worksite rather than ahead of time, they must not arrive or conduct themselves in a manner that would foreseeably provoke flight by workers, or that would leave a reasonable person with the belief that he had no choice but to consent to the raid. (Emphasis added). 27 INS contends that this provision is unreasonable and overbroad since flight by workers is virtually always a foreseeable consequence of INS agents' arrival at a factory. 28 We note that the court used the word deliberately in stating a similar restriction in paragraph seven. That appears to us to be a more understandable and enforceable standard than foreseeable provocation. 29 We direct that paragraph six be modified to substitute deliberately for the word foreseeably.