Opinion ID: 808547
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: jurisdiction

Text: The BIA has jurisdiction to review the IJ’s decision under 8 C.F.R. § 1003.1(b)(3). In general, “courts of appeals . . . have no jurisdiction to review [the BIA’s] discretionary and factual determinations presented in petitions for review.” Jarbough v. Att’y Gen., 483 F.3d 184, 188 (3d Cir. 2007). However, this Court has jurisdiction, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(D), to review the BIA’s final order for constitutional claims and questions of law. See Sukwanputra v. Gonzales, 434 F.3d 627, 634 (3d Cir. 2006) (“By virtue of proceedings to remove the alien from the United States.” 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h). 7 § 1252(a)(2)(D), constitutional claims or questions of law raised in a petition for review elude the jurisdiction-stripping provisions of the INA.”). Petitioner challenges the BIA’s statutory interpretation of 8 U.S.C. § 1182(h), thus raising a question of law within the meaning of § 1252(a)(2)(D). Accordingly, we can exercise jurisdiction over this petition for review.