Opinion ID: 3029938
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: jurisdiction

Text: We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) to review 2 Ana and the Morans’ son crossed the border illegally in 1993. Ana and Martin were married in 1996. For clarity, we shall refer to Ana Yuki Moran by her first name to distinguish her from petitioner, whom we call simply “Moran.” 898 MORAN v. ASHCROFT a final order of removal. Included within our jurisdiction is review of non-discretionary legal determinations regarding an alien’s eligibility for cancellation of removal. See MonteroMartinez v. Ashcroft, 277 F.3d 1137, 1144 (9th Cir. 2002). Although we lack jurisdiction to review discretionary determinations of moral character, we have jurisdiction to determine whether a petitioner’s conduct falls within a per se exclusion category, an issue that relates to eligibility for cancellation. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir. 2003).