Opinion ID: 870353
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Supplemental Final Judgment

Text: The court filed its Supplemental Final Judgment on May 14, 2009. With respect to Condemnation 2, the Supplemental Final Judgment stated that Condemnation 2 is valid and ordered judgment to be entered in favor of the County and Oceanside and against Coupe because (1) there was a valid public purpose in Condemnation 2 and no pretext was found[,] (2) [t]he Development Agreement did not invalidate Condemnation 2[,] (3) [t]here [wa]s no trespass[,] and (4) [t]here [wa]s no inverse condemnation. Just compensation for the property in Condemnation 2 was set at $162,204.83 and blight of summons damages [11] at 10% per annum. With respect to Coupe's October 11, 2007 Motion for statutory damages for Condemnation 1, the Supplemental Final Judgment ordered that judgment be entered against the County in the amount of $1,586,871.52. [12] With respect to Coupe's March 20, 2009 Motion for additional damages not previously claimed in its October 11, 2007 Motion, the Supplemental Final Judgment ordered that judgement be entered against the County in the amount of $46,945.81.