Opinion ID: 2799381
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: because the undisputed facts establish as a

Text: MATTER OF LAW THE CONTINUING NATURE OF THE VIOLATIONS AGAINST SOON SAN PAK, DOES THE “CONTINUING VIOLATION” DOCTRINE APPLY? 8 III. DO THE UNDISPUTED FACTS ESTABLISH AS A MATTER OF LAW THAT THE SMITH SISTERS KNEW OR WITH THE EXERCISE OF ORIGINAL DILIGENCE SHOULD HAVE KNOWN OF PRINGLE’S EMBEZZLEMENT MORE THAN THREE YEARS BEFORE THEY FILED SUIT WHEN NEITHER THEY NOR THE PUBLIC OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE FOR OVERSEEING PRINGLE KNEW HE WAS EMBEZZLING FUNDS AND PRINGLE ACTIVELY CONCEALED HIS EMBEZZLEMENT OF FUNDS?