Opinion ID: 2718331
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Acai Total Burn Scheme

Text: Unlike the other schemes previously described, however, the evidence does not show that Kimoto controlled Vertek at the time the Acai Total Burn scheme was developed, nor does it show that he directly participated in the scheme. Kimoto was incarcerated on April 18, 2008, whereas work on the Acai Berry scheme did not begin until February 2009. Accordingly, Kimoto cannot be held liable for either injunctive relief or restitution with respect to the Acai Total FTC V. KIMOTO 19 Burn scheme. We vacate that part of the district court’s grant of summary judgment and permanent injunction based on Vertek’s violations of the FTC Act in connection with the Acai Total Burn scheme.