Opinion ID: 1233935
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Brooks's state-law claims

Text: Upon dismissing Brooks's federal claims, the district court properly declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Brooks's remaining state-law claims. Under 28 U.S.C. § 1367(c)(3), the district court may decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over a claim if it has dismissed all claims over which it has original jurisdiction. If the federal claims are dismissed before trial, the state claims generally should be dismissed as well. Wojnicz v. Davis, 80 Fed.Appx. 382, 384-85 (6th Cir.2003) (citing Taylor v. First of Am. Bank-Wayne, 973 F.2d 1284, 1287 (6th Cir.1992)).