Opinion ID: 2633477
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: The Subpoenas of Medical and Employment Records and the Results of HIV Tests

Text: Bridget subpoenaed John's medical records, seeking the results of any HIV and AIDS tests, medical records concerning HIV and AIDS and treatment for those conditions, medical records concerning any and all sexually transmitted diseases since 1980, and medical records concerning any treatment he had received since 1980. Bridget also subpoenaed John's employment records from Universal Studios, including records regarding his medical leave and the reasons therefor and any disability he was suffering from. John filed a motion to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that the subpoenas were not supported by affidavits or declarations as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 1985, subdivision (b) or by good cause; that the records were privileged from discovery under the right to privacy in the state and federal Constitutions; that the records were additionally privileged from discovery under Health and Safety Code section 120975 and Evidence Code sections 994 and 1014; and that the subpoenas constituted harassment. The referee recommended the motions to quash be denied but limited the discoverable medical records relating to treatment since 1980 to those regarding treatment received `for AIDS or HIV infection.' The superior court adopted the referee's recommendation, and the Court of Appeal denied relief as to this part of the order.