Opinion ID: 1037656
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: mfm

Text: In its complaint, Xena alleged that, upon information and belief, MFM is a foreign, non-Cayman Islands corporation, with offices in Miami, Florida, and that MFM conducts business in Florida. In its motion to dismiss, MFM refutes these assertions in detail. See note 1 supra. David=s declaration supports and reaffirms MFM=s position as a foreign corporation. As president of MUS, David is unable to bind MFM in any way, or sign documents on its behalf. 10 Case: 11-14770 Date Filed: 08/14/2013 Page: 11 of 16 Dion=s declaration states that he is a foreign citizen. He is the decision maker for MFM, a foreign corporation. When the burden of proof shifted back to Xena, Xena responded with a memorandum of law opposing the motions to dismiss, and submitted the affidavit of its counsel, Mr. Aronoff. The district court dismissed the six exhibits attached to Aronoff=s affidavit as hearsay, applying the legal standards set forth above. It found that Xena had not established a prima facie case supporting personal jurisdiction over MFM, and granted its motion to dismiss. We agree. 12 In the chain of entities, there is not one Florida entity before us. Every entity in this appeal is a foreign corporation, including MFM.