Opinion ID: 480559
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: 12 The issues presented for resolution on appeal are as follows:1. Did the District Court err in instructing the jury that Baker, Watts was a seller as to all plaintiffs within the meaning of Sec. 12(2) of the Securities Act of 1933? 13 2. Did the District Court err in refusing Baker, Watts permission to call an expert witness to testify concerning the Superior stock sale, under the circumstances of this case? 14 3. Did the District Court err in its determination of the plaintiff's damages by disregarding the tax benefits received by the plaintiffs as a result of their investment in the limited partnership? 15 4. Did the District Court err in its rulings and in its instructions to the jury on the issue of causation? 16 5. Did the District Court err in directing a verdict against two plaintiffs, Bowes and Dilatush?