Opinion ID: 3014747
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: The March statements.

Text: 2 The Government points out that the admonishments warned Jacobs that she was subject to prosecution for any unauthorized unlawful acts. Jacobs, in turn, points out that the admonishments state that “[t]he source must abide by the instructions of the FBI.” 4 On March 14, 2000, Jacobs called Sullivan and asked to see him right away about an “important” matter. She requested they meet at her hotel room and Sullivan agreed. Sullivan and FBI Special Agent Scott Duffey went to the hotel, knocked on Jacobs’ door, and Jacobs invited them in.3 Jacobs told them she had information about “the biggest” drug dealer in Wilmington. She said that Bruce Stewart was regularly importing cocaine from Los Angeles to Wilmington using couriers. She went on to describe the scope, members, and method of operation of Stewart’s drug organization. She also described the particular suitcases used by the organization to carry the cash and cocaine. Sullivan began to suspect that Jacobs was involved in these drug offenses because she possessed “entirely too much information.” Sullivan asked Jacobs if she had ever taken a trip to Los Angeles for Stewart, and Jacobs replied she had not. Sullivan then told Jacobs, “Listen[,] if you did, just tell me . . . because if it comes out later, I can’t cover you.” Jacobs again denied that she had traveled to Los Angeles on these drug buys, and Sullivan and Duffey then left the hotel room.4 3 The District Court expressly found that Jacobs invited Sullivan to her hotel room on March 14. 312 F. Supp. 2d at 624. However, the Court later stated that Jacobs was “summoned to the Wilmington FBI Office” on March 14. Id. at 631. The former statement was correct. 4 The District Court stated that Jacobs “had been specifically authorized to engage in the [Stewart] drug conspiracy . . . .” Id. at 631. However, we can find no evidence 5