Opinion ID: 1565085
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: contentions of appellants

Text: On appeal, the Commission alleges: (1) that the Kentucky Milk Marketing Law is not in violation of the Sherman Anti-Trust Act; (2) that the trial court erred in holding that Kroger met its burden of proof; (3) that the Kentucky Milk Marketing and Antimonopoly Commission does not violate Sections 1 and 2 of the Kentucky Constitution; (4) that the federal courts have exclusive jurisdiction of all matters involving the Sherman Anti-Trust Act; (5) that the judgment of the trial court should be reviewed with respect to the appellants, as individuals, and (6) that those specific provisions of the Kentucky Milk Marketing and Antimonopoly Commission which were declared unconstitutional are severable. We disagree and affirm the judgment of the trial court. Because we decide this case on the basis of the Kentucky Constitution, we need not discuss contentions (1) and (4), which relate to the Sherman Anti-Trust Act.