Opinion ID: 4056183
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: n0 basis in law or fact

Text: 1. § 1983 Claim All of Calton's § 1983 claims against Schiller are barred by the doctrine found in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). If Plaintiff were to prevail on the claims brought in this suit it would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction. I d. at 487. Unless a conviction is overturned or invalidated by a court with such authority, a claim that would implicitly invalidate the conviction is not cognizable. The Supreme Court in Heck held: DEFENDANT CRIMINAL DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF TARRANT COUNTY, TEXAS' FIRST AMENDED · ANSWER AND MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 14 OF THE TEXAS CIVIL PRACTICE & REMEDIES CODE (Cause No. 153-270690-14; Calton v. Schiller)- PAGE 3 ______________________________________€?d~Lb_ _Lt '_~N-~~---~--~--~---- _a.~~- __e_~J~- _d::I----~----------------- ----------- [W]hen a sbite prisoner seeks damages in a § ig8;3--s-uit, the aisfricfcourf -- must consider whether a judgment in favor of the plaintiff would necessarily imply the invalidity of his conviction or sentence; if it would, the complaint must be dismissed unless the plaintiff can demonstrate that the conviction or sentence has already been invalidated. I d. In Vasquez v. Dunn, 2011 WL 5878428 (N.D. Tex. Sept. 8, 2011), the court held that an inmate's suit against a court reporter should be dismissed pursuant to the Heck doctrine. Inmate Vasquez sued the court reporter claiming that the court reporter's negligence in preparing an incomplete and inaccurate trial record prevented fair consideration of his appeal. I d. at . The U.S. District Court held that the claim that the court reporter prepared an inaccurate trial transcript, thereby interfering with his right to appeal ... undermines the validity of his conviction. Id. at 2; see Penley v.