Opinion ID: 2587254
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: Failure to object to prosecution argument

Text: Defendant also contends that defense counsel was ineffective in failing to object to the assertedly improper arguments of the prosecutor described above. ( Ante, 108 Cal.Rptr.2d at pp. 366-369, 25 P.3d at pp. 582-585.) We have concluded that no prejudicial misconduct occurred. Accordingly, there can be no prejudice from defense counsel's failure to object. ( People v. Thomas, supra, 2 Cal.4th 489, 531, 7 Cal.Rptr.2d 199, 828 P.2d 101; see People v. Lucas, supra, 12 Cal.4th 415, 494, 48 Cal.Rptr.2d 525, 907 P.2d 373.)