Opinion ID: 1865215
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Disposition. In summary, we conclude as follows:

Text: 1. Plaintiffs are permitted a reasonable opportunity to complete discovery in the deposition of adjuster Butz, and their motion in connection therewith should be ruled upon prior to any ruling on defendants' motion for summary judgment; thus, the district court's ruling to the contrary is reversed; 2. Defendants will be allowed to depose plaintiffs' attorney regarding the conversations with his clients concerning the statute of limitations issue; thus, the district court's ruling to the contrary is reversed; 3. Defendants must produce the documents requested by plaintiffs in paragraphs numbered one and two of their motion to produce, as well as any documents relevant only to the issues in this action requested in paragraph numbered three. No production of the items in paragraph numbered four is required at this time. The case is remanded for further appropriate proceedings. AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; AND REMANDED. All Justices concur except REYNOLDSON, C.J., and NEUMAN, J., who take no part.