Opinion ID: 2763450
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: conclusion

Text: McManus failed to state a claim for tortious discharge because he did not allege that he was terminated for externally reporting illegal activity or for refusing to participate in illegal activity. Thus, the district court did not err in dismissing his claim. Therefore, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. J. J. Parraguirr,e J. Saitta cc: Hon. David A. Hardy, District Judge Wm. Patterson Cashill, Settlement Judge Cavanaugh-Bill Law Offices, LLC Laxalt & Nomura, Ltd./Reno Washoe District Court Clerk 5 SinceMcManus concedes that he participated in the illegal activity, we do not address whether he alleged a reasonable belief that the activity was illegal. Furthermore, we do not address whether issue preclusion prevents McManus from stating a tortious discharge claim. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 5 (0) 1947A el>