Opinion ID: 1100720
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Whether the trial court erred in holding a Motion for Extension of Time must be made within the 120 days provided by M.R.C.P. 4(h).

Text: ¶ 22. Finally, Heard claims the trial court erred in holding a Motion for Extension of Time must be made within the 120 days as provided by M.R.C.P. 4(h). After a careful reading of the Order of Dismissal, we note the trial court never concluded a motion for extension of time must be filed within the 120-day service period. Instead, the court found that because Heard did not show good cause for her failure to serve Remy within the time allowed, the case should be dismissed. Therefore, Heard's final assignment of error is without merit.