Opinion ID: 2763492
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: 1.2, III.1.3, and III.2.2.

Text: Plaintiffs ask us to overturn the following of the district court’s holdings that were favorable to the BiOp: • Reclamation did not violate its obligations under section 7 of the ESA when it accepted the 2009 Salmonid BiOp. Id. at 955. • NMFS did not need to segregate discretionary and nondiscretionary agency activities when constituting the environmental baseline. Id. at 852. SAN LUIS V. LOCKE 39 • NMFS did not err by classifying indirect mortality factors as a direct effect of the continuing Projects. Id. at 870–71. The district court entered its final judgment on December 12, 2011. See Final Judgment, ECF No. 655. The parties timely cross-appealed. This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012).