Opinion ID: 2495846
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 10

Heading: P-21 (alternate theory)

Text: ¶ 52. Dewey contends that the trial court improperly denied P-21, [6] which imposed liability if Byrd negligently had allowed his vehicle to stop in a lane of travel on the highway when it was possible or reasonably practicable for him to steer his vehicle down the driveway and out of the highway.... Dewey argues that refusing the instruction prohibited the jury from hearing this alternate theory of the case. ¶ 53. Neither the transcript nor the record shows where the court refused P-21. The copy provided by Dewey does not indicate that the instruction was offered or that the court refused the instruction. The record is otherwise silent as to whether the instruction was even considered by the trial court. Thus, the Court has no duty to address his contention. M.R.A.P. 28.