Opinion ID: 2634598
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues raised on rehearing

Text: 1. Did the Court improperly review Lovelace's waiver of counsel and his request for an investigator based solely on court minutes of the pretrial hearing? 2. Did the Court misinterpret Lovelace's double jeopardy argument against resentencing? 3. Did the Court err in rejecting Lovelace's ex post facto argument, in light of new case law? 4. Is any error resulting from Ring harmless in that the findings necessary to impose the death penalty may be implied from the jury's verdict of first-degree murder and first-degree kidnapping? 5. Do the provisions of I.C. § 19-5306(e) and Article I, § 22 of the Idaho Constitution provide statutory and constitutional authority for the admission of victim impact evidence in capital cases?