Opinion ID: 15662
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Gasaway's robbery conviction

Text: 32 Gasaway argues that the Government offered insufficient evidence to tie him to the Dairy Queen and Hardee's robberies. Yet Mouton, acting as Government witness, specifically testified that Gasaway participated in both crimes. [T]he uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice or co-conspirator can be sufficient to support the verdict. United States v. Restrepo, 994 F.2d 173, 182 (5th Cir.1993). Moreover, Mouton's testimony concerning various details of the Dairy Queen robbery was in fact extensively corroborated by other evidence. As to Gasaway's participation specifically, two other witnesses testified that a photograph of Gasaway's vehicle looks exactly like the car and that's the car that they saw leaving after the Dairy Queen robbery. The jury also heard Jason Gully testify that on the night of the Hardee's robbery, Gasaway and McCray came to his residence in Gasaway's maroon car excitedly asking about Hickman and Mouton, who had been apprehended by police. A reasonable juror could have determined, based on the evidence presented, that Gasaway either robbed, or aided and abetted the robberies of Dairy Queen and Hardee's. We therefore affirm those convictions. 33