Opinion ID: 2120575
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Compliance with the Order of Delivery

Text: In 3D's petition for contempt, it listed the equipment that was missing from the aircraft that were to be delivered pursuant to the court's order of delivery. Specifically, the petition alleged that of the aircraft to be returned in assembled form, two aircraft were disassembled and un-airworthy, one's engine was missing components and the serial number data plate, and one had the engine oil cooler removed. In addition, three aircraft had an [i]ncorrect and incomplete GPS (Global Positioning System) and one had no GPS system at all. Finally, one had an [i]ncorrect and incomplete spray system, one lacked any spray equipment, and one had an incomplete spray system. It is clear to this court that the aircraft were not turned over to 3D in an assembled state, as directed by the circuit court's order. Furthermore, Omni's claim that the court's order was unclear and that it and Papachristou did not willfully disobey the order, because the court had told them not to touch the parts, does not ring true. Again, the court's order merely prevented Omni from modifying, changing, or altering the aircrafts or parts thereof. Because Omni and Papachristou failed to turn over to the sheriff assembled planes and related equipment as specified in the order of delivery, they were in contempt of that order.