Opinion ID: 2607578
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Correction of the Record

Text: Appellant argues that the district court erred when it failed to correct inconsistencies in the record. In his brief, Appellant stated, Appellant's Brief in Support of the Motion to Withdraw Nolo Contendere plea, Appellant's Reply Brief, Evidentiary Hearing transcript, and the Court's Decision Letter, as well as the discussion in the appeal brief all show the record should be corrected. Appellant has failed to support this contention with cogent argument and authority; therefore, we refuse to consider it. Secrest v. Secrest, 781 P.2d 1339 (Wyo. 1989); Dawson v. City of Casper, 731 P.2d 1186 (Wyo. 1987).