Opinion ID: 604567
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Miscalculation of Criminal History

Text: 12 Eirven contends the district court miscalculated his criminal history by counting four prior misdemeanor offenses, Case Nos. S12166, S16390, S16995, S16512. Appellant's Brief at 15-16. He presents absolutely no reason why Case No. S12166 shouldn't be counted. He argues that the other three should not be counted under U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(c)(1)(A) because they resulted in less than 30 days in jail and in summary probation (which he contends, without citation to any authority, shouldn't be counted as normal probation for § 4A1.2(c)(1)(A) purposes). His argument is totally frivolous. Case No. S16995 resulted in 45 days jail. Case No. S16390 was subsequently excluded from his criminal history calculation. Addendum to Presentence Report at 2. Case No. S16512 resulted in 3 years nonsummary probation.