Opinion ID: 1246793
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: The Default of Land Title Insurance Co.

Text: Land Title failed to answer, and a default judgment was entered against the company. The district judge entered an order in favor of all the defendants. Appellants assert that it was error to absolve Land Title. We do not agree. Under the facts presented, we know of no theory that would support any finding that Land Title was liable in damages to the appellants. Cf. Peterson v. City of Reno, 84 Nev. 60, 436 P.2d 417 (1968); In re Forsyth's Estate, 45 Nev. 385, 204 P. 887 (1922); Bullion Mining Co. v. Croesus Gold & Silver Mining Co., 3 Nev. 336 (1867). The judgment of the district court is affirmed. COLLINS, C.J., and ZENOFF, BATJER and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.