Opinion ID: 604416
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: The claimant's daily activities.

Text: 23 SSR 88-13, quoted in Bunnell, 947 F.2d at 346. Our cases have approved the ALJ's use of other factors to make the credibility determination. See, e.g., Fair v. Bowen, 885 F.2d 597, 604 (9th Cir.1989) (considering that claimant had received only minimal conservative treatment for his various complaints of persistent and increasingly severe pain; that claimant was no longer receiving physical therapy for his pain; and that claimant had resumed a somewhat normal level of daily activity, including driving his own automobile); Copeland v. Bowen, 861 F.2d 536, 542 (9th Cir.1988) (ALJs' comments indicate they considered [claimant's] credibility as well as medical evidence in making their decisions about [his] alleged disabling pain.); Green, 803 F.2d at 532 (The ALJ thoroughly discussed the medical evidence in making his credibility finding.). Based on the foregoing, we conclude that the ALJ made sufficiently specific findings to support his rejection of Kosman's subjective excess pain testimony.