Opinion ID: 1924322
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Failure to Dismiss the Defendant

Text: Nadeau first argues that he should have been dismissed from the EDFP's lawsuit. We decline to address this argument. Nadeau states in his brief that the trial court denied his motion for all of the reasons set forth in the [EDFP's] objection. Nadeau, however, has not provided an adequate record for us to review this ruling. Nowhere in the materials submitted on appeal is there a copy of Nadeau's motion, EDFP's objection, the trial court's decision, the transcript of any hearing on the motion, or any motion to reconsider or ruling thereon. Absent such materials, we lack a record sufficient to review this ruling. See Tiberghein v. B.R. Jones Roofing Co., 151 N.H. 391, 395, 856 A.2d 21 (2004); Sup.Ct. R. 13(2).