Opinion ID: 2561825
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: [¶2] 1. Whether the district court's judgment and order should be summarily affirmed because of Three Way's non-compliance with W.R.A.P. 7.01(e)(2)? 2. Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying Three Way's motion for leave to amend its complaint? 3. Whether the district court abused its discretion when it granted, in part, Burton's motion in limine? 4. Whether the district court erred as a matter of law when it denied Three Way's motion to affirm the jury's verdict? 5. Whether the district court abused its discretion in instructing the jury as to Three Way's duty of workmanship? 6. Whether the district court abused its discretion by admitting evidence of Three Way's claimed money damages?