Opinion ID: 2639911
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: A. Did the district court err in holding that evidence of an alternate route Kelleher could have taken was relevant? B. Did the district court abuse its discretion in admitting into evidence a videotape of the alternate route? C. Did the district court err in instructing the jury regarding Slack's life expectancy without allowing Kelleher to introduce evidence of her poor health? D. Did the district court err in not admitting portions of the deposition testimony of an expert witness after Slack had introduced other portions of such deposition testimony? E. Did the district court err in excluding evidence that Slack had cataracts at the time of the accident? F. Did the district court err in denying a mistrial after Slack's counsel referred in closing argument to the lack of testimony that her poor health was a cause of the accident? G. Did the district court err in denying Kelleher's motion to reduce the judgment by the amount of Slack's Medicare benefits?