Opinion ID: 6329210
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Post-Settlement Disagreements

Text: After the settlement agreement, Cyrus informed OOD that he could not produce police reports documenting that he (or his employees) ever called the police to report the theft of the Starbucks products. At the district court’s behest, OOD asked the campus police department to search its telephone logs and incident reports. That search yielded just one police report of loose -8- No. 20-3913, Cyrus v. Univ. of Toledo, et al. relevance, memorializing an employee’s report of $40 missing from a tip-jar.7 However, other documentation was forthcoming; Cyrus provided OOD with documentation establishing the value of the lost inventory: (1) a list of items Cyrus purchased to replace missing coffee; (2) the written communications, excerpted above, that Cyrus sent Hustwick regarding the missing inventory; and (3) copies of all related receipts, which amounted to $7,118.79.