Opinion ID: 708850
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Aldo Ramos

Text: 3 Aldo is correct that United States v. Buchanan, 59 F.3d 914 (9th Cir.1995), compels the conclusion that his apparently valid waiver of his right to appeal is not enforceable. However, Aldo's arguments regarding the district court's Sec. 3B1.1(a) four-level enhancement for Aldo's role as an organizer or leader in the organization demonstrate, at best, that the facts upon which the district court relied were susceptible to more than one interpretation. Because he has failed to demonstrate that the district court's finding was clearly erroneous, we must affirm. See United States v. Monroe, 943 F.2d 1007, 1019 (9th Cir.1991) (stating that a district court's finding that a defendant is an organizer or leader in the criminal activity is a question of fact reviewed for clear error). 4