Opinion ID: 2976323
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Kistner’s OCSPA claims

Text: The district court also granted summary judgment to Margelefsky on Kistner’s OCSPA claims. Judgment on these claims was predicated on the court’s conclusion that the collection letter “did not make any misrepresentations, nor was it deceptive in any way,” and therefore did not violate the FDCPA. Kistner presented no independent evidence for her OCSPA claims, and the No. 07-3134 Kistner v. The Law Offices of Michael P. Margelefsky et al. Page 9 district court therefore saw no reason not to grant summary judgment to Margelefsky on those claims. Because we have concluded that summary judgment on the FDCPA claims was improperly granted, Kistner’s OCSPA claims—specifically her claim for injunctive relief under the statute—must be remanded to the district court for reconsideration.