Opinion ID: 1652969
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: whether als was entitled to monetary damages as a result of the breach of the contract for title, and the lot and storage bin lease.

Text: ALS filed a notice of review with the circuit court. SDCL 15-26A-22 specifically provides that: [a]n appellee may obtain review of a judgment or order entered in the same action which may adversely affect him by filing a notice of review with the clerk of the Supreme Court within twenty days after the service of the notice of appeal. ALS did not comply with SDCL 15-26A-22 because the notice of review was never filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court. This Court has consistently held that failure to comply with the notice of review requirements results in a waiver. Gratzfeld v. Bomgaars Supply, 391 N.W.2d 200 (S.D.1986); Rowett v. McFarland, 394 N.W.2d 298 (S.D.1986); Application of Northwestern Bell Tel. Co., 326 N.W.2d 100 (S.D.1982). Accordingly, we do not consider the arguments regarding monetary damages raised in ALS's improperly filed notice of review. MILLER, C.J., WUEST, HENDERSON and SABERS, JJ., and MORGAN, Retired Justice, concur.