Opinion ID: 27619
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Adjustment for Role

Text: As noted above, the district court, finding that Woodley was a manager of the drug transaction, adjusted his base offense level upward by two levels pursuant to § 3B1.1(c).10 Woodley contends conclusorily that the summary of evidence in the presentence report and the trial testimony were insufficient support for the district court’s finding. We disagree. We review the district court’s factual finding for clear error. United States v. Narvaez, 38 F.3d 162, 166 (5th Cir.1994). While there must be an acceptable evidentiary basis for the court’s fact-finding at the sentencing hearing, “[t]he district court’s findings are not clearly erroneous if they are plausible in light of the record reviewed in its entirety.” Id. The evidence indicated that Woodley “cooked” the cocaine, chose the location for the drug transaction, and ordered a subordinate to show Garrison the cocaine. This evidence clearly supports the district court’s finding. III.