Opinion ID: 1596757
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 9

Heading: conclusion

Text: This Court's standard of review precludes consideration of Roberta's first three issues because of her failure to cite any authority in support of her argument. The chancellor did not err in interpreting Miss. Code Ann. § 97-33-7(2) as a bar to ownership of video poker machines because any interpretation of this statute did not in any way affect the chancellor's judgment in this case. Despite his mention of the statute in his decision, the final order does not mention § 97-33-7(2), but does include a division of the video poker machines of Grey Amusement Company. Finally, the chancellor did not err in expanding Clifford's rights in the Highway 61 property from possession only to exclusive use and possession. The chancellor was within his authority to modify his decision via his final order. Moreover, the evidence reveals that the chancellor intended to award Clifford exclusive use and possession all along. There being no error, this Court affirms. JUDGMENT IS AFFIRMED. HAWKINS, C.J., DAN M. LEE, P.J., SULLIVAN, PITTMAN, BANKS, JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr. and SMITH, JJ., concur. McRAE, J., concurs with separate written opinion.