Opinion ID: 174111
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: This court reviews a grant of summary judgment de novo. Weiner v. San Diego County, 210 F.3d 1025, 1028 (9th Cir.2000). [This] review is governed by the same standard used by the trial court under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c). Delta Sav. Bank v. United States, 265 F.3d 1017, 1021 (9th Cir.2001) (internal citations omitted). Under this standard, [w]e may affirm a summary judgment only if, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the party against whom it is granted, we find no genuine issue of material fact, and we find that the prevailing party is clearly entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Tribal Vill. of Akutan v. Hodel, 869 F.2d 1185, 1189 (9th Cir.1988). All justifiable factual inferences must be drawn in [ ] favor [of the nonmoving party], and we must reverse the grant of summary judgment if any rational trier of fact could resolve a material factual issue in [ ] favor [of the nonmoving party]. Sprint PCS Assets, L.L.C. v. City of Palos Verdes Estates, 583 F.3d 716, 720 (9th Cir.2009).