Opinion ID: 3010958
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Judicial Review Committee

Text: In January 1995, Dr. Pamintuan invoked her rights and requested a hearing. A Judicial Review Committee 7 and hearing officer were appointed. Hearings took place over several days in April and May 1995, during which Dr. Pamintuan was present and represented by counsel. The Judicial Review Committee approved the Executive Committee's recommendation that Dr. Pamintuan undertake one of two retraining options as a condition of reinstatement. The Judicial Review Committee based its decision on a detailed and extensive review of the record, which led it to conclude that Dr. Pamintuan hadexhibited a pattern of inadequate record-keeping; unacceptable delays in providing necessary treatments; exposing patients to unacceptable risks; poor medical judgment[;] and[ ] disregard of hospital policies. App. at B-48.