Opinion ID: 2624513
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Swanson's Disputes Regarding Chapman's Complaint

Text: Swanson disputes these conclusions, stating Chapman made a mere allegation that [a motion to modify child support] should have been filed in 2002. He argues he was not asked by Chapman (or anyone on Chapman's behalf) to file a motion to modify child support in 2002. He further asserted at the hearing before this court that he had never been paid to file a motion. In addition, he argues he did not have the information he needed to file the motion. Swanson denies ever having received Chapman's letter of employment release from the Cleveland Browns and claims that he had a difficult time obtaining financial documents from Chapman in order to file a motion to modify child support. In other words, Swanson asks this court to accept his version of the facts rather than accept the findings of the hearing panel.