Opinion ID: 1034195
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Tenisha—Counts 5 and 9

Text: Although the Government addresses challenges that Tenisha could have raised as to the sufficiency of the evidence to support her convictions on Counts 5 and 9 for unlawful use of a communication device in furtherance of the charged conspiracy, in violation of § 843(b), a thorough review of Tenisha’s brief reveals that she challenges only her conspiracy conviction (Count 1). Tenisha discusses Counts 5 and 9 only insofar as they support the drug quantity finding relevant to Count 1. Although we need not address Tenisha’s convictions on Counts 5 and 9 because she failed to challenge them on appeal, we note that even if she had 23 Case: 12-30413 Document: 00512310475 Page: 24 Date Filed: 07/17/2013 No. 12-30413 argued insufficient evidence as to these convictions, she would have failed in light of the well-documented wire intercept evidence presented at trial.