Opinion ID: 784866
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Sufficiency of Evidence as to CCE Count (Soto-Beníquez, Soto-Ramírez)

Text: 172 Soto-Beníquez and Soto-Ramírez argue that there is insufficient evidence to support their convictions. They offer no further explanation, except to cite to their filings before the district court. Their argument as to sufficiency of evidence has been waived. See Grella, 42 F.3d at 36. If counsel desires our consideration of a particular argument, the argument must appear within the four corners of the brief filed in this court. Executive Leasing Corp. v. Banco Popular de P.R., 48 F.3d 66, 67-68 (1st Cir.1995). Attorneys cannot circumvent this requirement by referencing their district court filings. Id. at 68. 173