Opinion ID: 6348790
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: conclusion

Text: We hold that the district court correctly granted summary judgment in favor of ASB, but it abused its discretion in including attorney’s fees in its award of costs under Rule 41(d). AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART. attorney fees are not available under Rule 41(d).”); Esposito, 223 F.3d at 501 (7th Cir. 2000) (“Consequently, consistent with Marek, we hold that a party may recover reasonable attorneys’ fees as part of its ‘costs’ under Rule 41(d) only where the underlying statute defines costs to include attorneys’ fees.”). 11 “[I]f it is not necessary to decide more, it is necessary not to decide more.” N. Cnty. Commc’ns Corp. of Ariz. v. Qwest Corp., 824 F.3d 830, 838 n.2 (9th Cir. 2016) (quoting PDK Labs. Inc. v. DEA, 362 F.3d 786, 799 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (Roberts, J., concurring in part and concurring in the judgment)). 20 MOSKOWITZ V. AMERICAN SAVINGS BANK