Opinion ID: 3010248
Heading Depth: 5
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Members of a regular component of

Text: the armed forces . . . and other persons lawfully called or ordered into, or to duty in or for training in, the armed forces, from the dates when they are required by the terms of the call or order to obey it. . . . . (3) Members of a reserve component while on inactive-duty . . . . 10 U.S.C. § 802(a)(1) & (3) (1988). Those falling into one of the categories of persons listed above are said to be in a status subject to the Code. In the present case, there is no 6 dispute that Plaintiff was in a status subject to the Code at the time of the alleged offenses. In order to satisfy the second element, i.e., personal jurisdiction, Defendants called Plaintiff into active duty, a status subject to the Code, pursuant to the following statutory authority: (1) A member of a reserve component who is not on active duty and who is made the subject of proceedings under section 815 (article 15) or section 830 (article 30) with respect to an offense against this chapter may be ordered to active duty involuntarily for the purpose of-- (A) investigation under section 832 (article 32) of this title; (B) trial by court martial; or (C) nonjudicial punishment under section 815 of this title.