Opinion ID: 2513951
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: The Board Engaged in Reasoned Decision-Making.

Text: Dennis Bradbury argues that the Board failed to engage in reasoned decision-making and that this violated his due process rights. He argues primarily that the Board ignored evidence refuting Dr. Nelson and Dr. Flora's testimony. The Board summarized the evidence presented by each witness in its eighteen-page decision. The Board also reviewed the list of possible job activities prepared by Claudia McLean and the video reenactment of Linda Bradbury's possible work activities. A review of the Board's decision and of the evidence in the record shows that the Board engaged in reasoned decision-making. Dennis Bradbury's argument to the contrary essentially asks us to re-weigh the evidence, which we will not do. [31] The Board's decision that the testimony of certain doctors is more persuasive than that of others is precisely the type of credibility determination that only the Board may make. [32]