Opinion ID: 213506
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: standard of review

Text: Because the Quinoneses did not specifically object to the language of the conscious avoidance jury instruction, we review for plain error. FED.R.CRIM.P. 30(d). Under this standard, the Quinoneses must demonstrate that any error (1) is clear or obvious, rather than subject to reasonable dispute; (2) affected [their] substantial rightsi.e., that there is a reasonable probability that the error affected the outcome of the trial; and (3) seriously affects the fairness, integrity or public reputation of judicial proceedings. Kaiser, 609 F.3d at 565 (quoting United States v. Marcus, ___ U.S. ____, 130 S.Ct. 2159, 2164, 176 L.Ed.2d 1012 (2010) (internal quotation marks and alterations omitted)).