Opinion ID: 29313
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Fla., 941 F.2d 1157, 1162 (11th Cir. 1991)

Text: To pass constitutional muster, a time, place (advancing several reasons why narrow tailoring and manner regulation must be “content-neu- requirement survives City of Renton). tral, . . . narrowly tailored to serve a significant 4 government interest, and leave open ample The more recent Lakeland Lounge decision, alternative channels of communication.” which also dealt with First Amendment challenges Frisby v. Schultz, 487 U.S. 474, 481 (1988) to a “secondary effects” ordinance, did not mention (internal citations omitted). In City of Renton, the narrow-tailoring requirement, but neither did it 475 U.S. at 47, the Court created some explicitly repudiate it. See Lakeland Lounge, 973 confusion as to the appropriate test by stating F.2d at 1257 (holding that zoning ordinance that “time, place, and manner regulations are restricting the location of adult businesses must be content-neutral, “‘designed to serve a substantial governmental interest’ and may ‘not unreasonably limit alternative avenues of communication’”) 2 See, e.g., Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Pub. Co., (quoting City of Renton, 475 U.S. at 47). Because 486 U.S. 750, 757 (1992) (invalidating regulation Lakeland Lounge did not state that the standards it that “plac[es] unbridled discretion in the hands of imposed were the only ones required, it is not a government official or agency”); Southeastern directly inconsistent with SDJ or with post-City of Promotions, Ltd. v. Conrad, 420 U.S. 546, 553 Renton Supreme Court opinions applying the time, (1975) (same). place, and manner test. 3