Opinion ID: 1904462
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: on suggestion of error and motion

Text: ETHRIDGE, J. Appellant's suggestion of error reargues substantially the same points made on the original submission and dealt with in our opinion in 122 So.2d 256. The Court in banc has considered carefully the issues, and concludes that the suggestion of error should be overruled. One additional comment seems pertinent: Appellant's argument, that our original decision overruled sub silentio Oliphant v. The Carthage Bank, 224 Miss. 386, 80 So.2d 63 (1955), is incorrect. That case involved principally the invalidity of a conditional order of the board. It has no application here. Because of the disposition of this case on suggestion of error, with eight judges participating, appellant's motion for a hearing before the full Court in banc is moot, and that motion is dismissed. Suggestion of error overruled, and motion for hearing in banc dismissed, because moot. Hall, Lee, Kyle and Gillespie, JJ., concur; McGehee, C.J., and Holmes and Arrington, JJ., dissent as to suggestion of error. McElroy, J., took no part.