Opinion ID: 2779229
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 9

Heading: Eleventh Assignment

Text: of Error Thorpe alleges that the trial court erred by convicting him on insufficient evidence. Thorpe could have raised sufficiency of the evidence on direct appeal, but he did not. This claim is procedurally barred. See Boppre, supra. 10. Twelfth Assignment of Error Thorpe assigns that the district court erred in failing to consider his motion in opposition to the State’s motion to dismiss when rendering its decision to deny postconviction relief. The claims raised in Thorpe’s motion in opposition were not pleaded in his amended motion for postconviction relief, which was the operative pleading before the Nebraska Advance Sheets 164 290 NEBRASKA REPORTS court. Therefore, the court did not err in denying postconviction relief without considering the claims raised in Thorpe’s motion in opposition.