Opinion ID: 32650
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: sufficiency of the evidence

Text: Appellants assert that they provided a great deal of evidence indicating that the July 2000 accident aggravated their pre-existing injuries. Based on this cumulative evidence, Appellants assert that no reasonable jury could have found an absence of aggravation. Appellants’ argument is without merit. Appellees repeatedly demonstrated that any and all of the ailments suffered by the Appellants originated prior to the July 2000 accident. Although many doctors testified as to Appellants’ injuries, none provided any significant evidence linking the July 2000 accident to an aggravation of any injury. Indeed, the record indicates that the state of Appellants’ health and injuries did not change as a result of the July 2000 accident. Therefore, the jury verdict must be upheld.