Opinion ID: 1651952
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 16

Heading: The trial court erred by failing to fully assess the damages suffered by Janie Hessler and Paul M. Allen, to Richard A. Nicholls and EB, Inc.

Text: ¶ 40. Allen's contention is that none of the damages awarded to Hessler should have been assessed against him, but instead should have been attributed to Nicholls and EB. He further argues that he should be awarded damages for the loss of his property in an amount not less than $50,000.00. Allen cites no applicable law to support his position except for the standard of review. In establishing the liability of the parties, it is clear to us that the only person against whom a judgment should have been rendered is Allen. He owed Hessler on her assigned note and failed to pay. He was in default and a judgment against him was proper. There is no merit to this assignment of error.