Opinion ID: 214490
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: CAPRS Reports

Text: Assuming, without deciding, that the CAPRS Reports were favorable to Jeanpierre and material to his guilt, Jeanpierre has failed to prove that the government suppressed the CAPRS reports. See Ladoucer, 573 F.3d at 636. Although a defendant's Brady rights are violated if he discovers information after trial which had been known to the prosecution but unknown to the defense, the same is not true, where, as here, the evidence is discovered during trial. United States v. Almendares, 397 F.3d 653, 664 (8th Cir. 2005) (quotation and citations omitted). We have previously held that  Brady does not require pretrial disclosure, and due process is satisfied if the information is furnished before it is too late for the defendant to use it at trial. Id. Here, Jeanpierre was given the opportunity to call any additional witnesses based on the content of the reports without objection from the government. He elected not to conduct any further inquiry of any witness based on this material. Thus, due process is satisfied. See Almendares, 397 F.3d at 664.