Opinion ID: 614360
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Different or Additional State Requirement

Text: In order for the class to recover in this lawsuit, a court would have to hold that California's UCL and FAL required something different than what the FDA required in order for AMO to label MoisturePlus a disinfectant. Those California laws would have to require that AMO test for Acanthamoeba, and show that MoisturePlus kills it in sufficient quantities. That is, California law would have a requirement that is additional to the federal requirements. Accordingly, the class' claims are expressly preempted by § 360. The district court was incorrect to conclude that this class of plaintiffs lacked standing, but [w]e may affirm the district court's summary judgment on any ground supported by the record. Hawn v. Exec. Jet Mgmt., 615 F.3d 1151, 1155 (9th Cir. 2010) (citation omitted). Here, the record demonstrates that the class' claims are preempted, so we affirm that grant of summary judgment.