Opinion ID: 1377397
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 8

Heading: Carlos

Text: (8) Defendant notes the jury was not instructed to find he intended to kill in connection with any of the various special circumstances, and asserts this error affects both the felony-murder special-circumstance findings and the multiple-murder special-circumstance finding. ( Carlos v. Superior Court (1983) 35 Cal.3d 131 [197 Cal. Rptr. 79, 672 P.2d 862]; People v. Turner (1984) 37 Cal.3d 302, 329 [208 Cal. Rptr. 196, 690 P.2d 669].) We recently held in People v. Anderson (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1104, 1138-1150 [240 Cal. Rptr. 585, 742 P.2d 1306], that Carlos and Turner must be overruled in light of intervening decisions of the United States Supreme Court. We find the record establishes beyond doubt that defendant was the actual killer in this case, and hence the finding required by Enmund v. Florida (1982) 458 U.S. 782 [73 L.Ed.2d 1140, 102 S.Ct. 3368] is satisfied. ( Cabana v. Bullock (1986) 474 U.S. 376, 390-391 [88 L.Ed.2d 704, 719-720, 106 S.Ct. 689, 699-700].)