Opinion ID: 4528629
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Treating Sources

Text: Appellant asserts that the ALJ “disregarded [Claimant’s] treating sources in her decision.” Appellant’s Br. 11. However, Appellant does not provide any specific example of the ALJ disregarding any treating sources. In support of Appellant’s contention, Appellant notes that usually more weight is given to the opinion of an examining source than the opinion of a non-examining source. Appellant further states that this “was not properly done by the ALJ.” Appellant’s Br. 12. Absent any support for this contention, we conclude that Appellant has not preserved this argument. Barna, 877 F.3d at 145 (“[W]e have consistently refused to consider ill-developed arguments or those not properly raised and discussed in the appellate briefing.”).