Opinion ID: 1887103
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 8

Heading: Second Request for Response to Complaint

Text: 9. On January 28, 2002, Bar Counsel wrote to Respondent setting forth Respondent's obligation to respond to the complaint, along with a subpoena duces tecum. Stip. ¶ 2; BX 2. [9] 10. This letter constituted a legitimate inquiry by Bar Counsel and a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority. [10] 11. The letter of January 28, 2002, was mailed to Respondent at 7767 Astrella Court, Springfield, Virginia. Stip. ¶ 2; BX 1. 12. The January 28 letter warned that disciplinary charges could be brought if Respondent failed to respond. BX 2. 13. Respondent failed to respond to Bar Counsel's letter of January 28, 2002. Stip. ¶ 2; BX 2.