Opinion ID: 2631908
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: State v. Wheeler

Text: John Wheeler was charged with two counts of robbery in the second degree, a class B felony. Wheeler faced a maximum sentence of 10 years for each count. RCW 9A.20.021. [1] On April 7, 1999, Wheeler filed a motion requesting formal notice, a jury trial, and proof beyond a reasonable doubt in the event he was convicted and faced sentencing pursuant to the POAA. This motion was denied. The jury found Wheeler guilty as charged. Subsequently, the State filed a persistent offender memorandum and presentence statement outlining Wheeler's current and prior offenses. At a separate sentencing hearing, the trial court determined the State had proved by preponderance of the evidence that Wheeler had two prior most serious offenses, under former RCW 9.94A.030(25) (1999) [2] and therefore was a persistent offender. Wheeler was sentenced to life imprisonment without possibility of parole under former RCW 9.94A.030(29) (1999) [3] and former RCW 9.94A.120(4) (1997). [4] Wheeler's motion for an order declaring that the sentencing constituted cruel and unusual punishment was denied. The Court of Appeals affirmed, finding we had previously rejected the constitutional arguments raised by Wheeler. State v. Wheeler, 101 Wash. App. 1022, 2000 WL 788420 (2000). Wheeler argues under Apprendi he is entitled to formal notice, a jury trial, and a determination beyond a reasonable doubt that he is a persistent offender.