Opinion ID: 3160472
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: The Belief of the Parties

Text: Finally, we note the undisputed understanding of both Casey and the DHHS that Casey was solely an employee of STG. When STG first hired Casey in 2007, the paperwork it provided to her described her as a full-time employee with STG International. Then, in 2010, when Casey executed her new employment agreement with STG following the subcontract with Millennium, STG provided her with a similar set of documents plainly identifying her as an STG employee. On top of that, the subcontract agreement itself provided that [a]ll persons furnished by [STG] . . . shall be considered solely [STG]'s employees or agents . . . . We can identify no record evidence which would permit either party to reasonably believe that Casey was an employee of the DHHS.