Opinion ID: 1773642
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: contentions of appellant for reversal

Text: 1. The court erred in denying defendant's jury demand filed on the 19th day of May, 1977. 2. The court erred in denying defendant's motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff's case. 3. The court erred in allowing plaintiff to introduce testimony and exhibits to vary the terms of the contract made the subject of this cause in violation of the parol evidence rule. 4. The court erred in finding defendant breached the contract made the subject of this cause by breach of warranty of the plans and specifications submitted to the contractor resulting in cardinal changes to the contract. 5. The court erred in allowing damages to plaintiff for delay in completion of the contract made the subject of this cause, even though plaintiff completed the contract within the specified time.