Opinion ID: 2625856
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: [¶ 2] The husband presents these issues for resolution: I. Whether the Court abused its discretion in determining the value of the business as its decision was not supported by the evidence at trial. II. Whether the Court abused its discretion in accepting opinion testimony from [the wife's] expert, as he was not qualified as an expert, and had done no substantive review of the value of the business. III. Whether it was error for the Court not to take career sacrifices into account when determining property distribution. IV. Whether it was error for the Court to allow [the wife] to deduct over three thousand dollars ($3,000.00) per month for child support calculation purposes where such sum is clearly includable in her income pursuant to § 20-2-303(a)(ii) & (iii). The wife frames the issues in the following manner: I. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in determining the value of Big Horn Basin Pathology? II. Did the trial court abuse its discretion in considering the expert testimony? III Did the trial court abuse its discretion in the manner in which it determined the marital sacrifices issue? IV. Did the court properly consider the parties['] financial affidavits in determining the child support calculations?