Opinion ID: 1712390
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: Lifetime Employment Contract.

Text: Veona and Elena next assert that the county court failed to make findings regarding Veona's rights under the lifetime employment contract. Based in part on the lifetime employment contract, the county court ordered that Veona was intended to be the lifetime beneficiary and, as such, was entitled to everything she claims to be entitled to under the contract. The county court considered the contract as evidence of the intent of the creator of the Trust and incorporated the contract into its findings regarding the terms of the Trust. Veona and Elena assert only that the county court failed to make a finding on the contract issue. However, because the substance of the contract was incorporated into the county court's findings regarding the terms of the Trust, we find no error on the record. We therefore reject Veona and Elena's second assignment of error.