Opinion ID: 4550864
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: conclusion

Text: We conclude that the district court did not err in admitting the translated English statements by Aguirre and excluding evidence under the residual hearsay exception. Based upon the totality of the circumstances, we conclude that the district court did not err in determining that Martinez waived his Miranda rights. Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the State, we further conclude that the evidence 65 State v. Blaha, 303 Neb. 415, 421, 929 N.W.2d 494, 501 (2019). - 541 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 306 Nebraska Reports STATE v. MARTINEZ Cite as 306 Neb. 516 at trial supported Martinez’ conviction. Finally, we conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion when imposing Martinez’ sentence. Accordingly, we affirm Martinez’ conviction and sentence. Affirmed. Freudenberg, J., not participating.