Opinion ID: 1166412
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Community Property Vehicles.

Text: Appellant claims as error the trial court's awarding two, old community property vehicles to the adult daughters of the parties. We agree. Respondent, while acknowledging that the disposition cannot be characterized as child support or a transfer to respondent, nonetheless argues that the trial court's action was well within the discretion conferred upon the trial court by NRS 125.150(1). This question was settled long ago by our Legislature and this Court. The latitude of discretion conferred upon the trial court by NRS 125.150(1) to dispose of community property with regard to the burden, if any, imposed upon it, for the benefit of the children, does not pertain to children beyond the age of majority. NRS 129.010; Lewis v. Lewis, 71 Nev. 301, 289 P.2d 414 (1955). The action by the trial court constituted error and requires reversal and remand.