Opinion ID: 883138
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: We state the issues on appeal as follows: 1. Whether the District Court erred in allowing the introduction of the DNA analysis evidence after it had excluded the statistical evidence relating to the DNA testing? 2. Whether the District Court erred in admitting the results of DNA tests performed on the muscle tissue found in Moore's camper? 3. Whether the District Court erred in admitting the PCR results performed on brain tissue discovered inside Moore's camper? 4. Whether the District Court erred in denying Moore's motion to suppress a statement he made to Sgt. Burns while being transported in a patrol car? 5. Whether the District Court erred in denying Moore's motions for a change of venue and motion for individual voir dire on the issue of pretrial publicity? 6. Whether the District Court erred when it denied Moore's motion for a new trial on claims of juror misconduct? 7. Whether the District Court erred when it prohibited Moore from impeaching the verdict with juror testimony? 8. Whether the District Court erred when it denied Moore's motion for a judgment of acquittal alleging there was insufficient evidence to convict him of deliberate homicide? 9. Whether Moore was denied his right to a speedy trial?