Opinion ID: 423
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Revell's Amended Complaint

Text: Not long after, on July 13, 2007, Revell filed an amended complaint against the Port Authority and Erickson. In the first count, he asserted that his arrest and the seizure of his property violated his Fourth Amendment rights because, pursuant to § 926A, he was legally entitled to carry the firearm and ammunition in his luggage, notwithstanding New Jersey law. Revell also asserted two procedural due process claims  one for damages and one for injunctive relief requiring the return of his property  based on allegations that the Port Authority has no post-deprivation procedure for Revell to recover the [property] seized from him and that the defendants did not provide him notice of the basis for the retention of the property and of an opportunity for a post-deprivation hearing. (App. at 64.) He later voluntarily dismissed his due process claim for injunctive relief, after his property was returned to him.