Opinion ID: 1726352
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: the lower court erred in refusing appellant's requested jury instruction d-20.

Text: Instruction D-20 was a circumstantial evidence instruction which we consider to be a comment upon the weight of the evidence and repetitious. The lower court granted several instructions on circumstantial evidence, including the two-theory instruction, and the jury was fully and adequately instructed on circumstantial evidence. The lower court committed no error in refusing the instruction. Anderson v. State, 413 So.2d 725 (Miss. 1982); Ragan v. State, 318 So.2d 879 (Miss. 1975). The judgment of the lower court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. PATTERSON, C.J., WALKER, P.J., and HAWKINS, DAN M. LEE, PRATHER, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN and ANDERSON, JJ., concur.