Opinion ID: 168798
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: standard of review

Text: 27 We apply a two-step approach to appellate review of sentences. United States v. Herula, 464 F.3d 1132, 1136 (10th Cir.2006). First, we determine whether the district court correctly calculated the applicable guideline range. Id. If so, then we determine whether the sentence imposed is reasonable. Id. A sentence within the correctly calculated Guidelines range is entitled to a rebuttable presumption of reasonableness. United States v. Kristl, 437 F.3d 1050, 1055 (10th Cir.2006). We continue to review legal questions de novo and the district court's factual findings for clear error. Herula, 464 F.3d at 1136.