Opinion ID: 1273411
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 10

Heading: The disciplinary recommendation is proper.

Text: (7) Although the ultimate resolution of discipline rests with this court, we attach great weight to the recommendation of the board. ( Vaughn v. State Bar (1973) 9 Cal.3d 698, 701 [108 Cal. Rptr. 806, 511 P.2d 1158]; Black v. State Bar (1972) 7 Cal.3d 676, 683-684 [103 Cal. Rptr. 288, 499 P.2d 968]; Sturr v. State Bar, supra, 52 Cal.2d 125, 127.) In this case our review of the record supports the board's recommendation. (8) It is ordered that petitioner be suspended from the practice of law for a period of two years. It is further ordered that within 30 days after the effective date of this order petitioner shall perform the acts specified in rule 955, subdivision (a), California Rules of Court, and that within 40 days after the effective date of this order petitioner shall file with the clerk of this court, with proof of service of a copy on the State Bar at its San Francisco office, an affidavit containing the matters specified in subdivision (c) of the foregoing rule. This order is effective 30 days after the filing of this opinion.