Opinion ID: 779119
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: formation of contract

Text: 6 a. These Terms and Conditions of Business ... shall form part of the contract between the Client ... and ADR... for the provision by ADR of the services set out in the Assignment unless otherwise agreed in writing by ADR. 7 b. The Assignment means the latest in date of the written proposal or engagement letter issued by ADR (and the Client's acceptance thereof) and the document (if any) issued by the client to commission the services of ADR (and ADR's written acceptance thereof). 8 c. The Contract shall comprise the Assignment, these Terms and any amendments thereto. 9 d. All amendments to the Contract must be in writing and signed by or on behalf of the Client and ADR.... 10 .... 11 f. In the event of any conflict between these Terms and the Assignment or any other document which forms part of the Contract, these terms shall prevail except where they have been amended (by specific reference to the relevant clause and paragraph of these Terms) as provided for herein. 12 .... 5. PERSONNEL 13 a. During the term of the Contract and for a period of six months after it's [sic] termination neither ADR nor the Client will directly or indirectly solicit, seek or procure the services of any employee of the other party connected with the Contract (other than by general advertising) without the prior written consent, and upon such terms specified by the other party. 14 J.A. at 440. No one at Agway or ARS signed the Proposal or Terms, and Schalk testified that he never read the Terms. 15 On February 26, 1998, Schalk and ARS executive Bruce Dailey met with ADR's Michels to discuss the Proposal and the transfer of ARS purchasing data to ADR. Michels testified that Schalk told him that they were going to go forward with the proposal.