Opinion ID: 2611904
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Summary of questions presented and holdings under section 14(c).

Text: The parties' arguments raise at least three legal questions which require resolution in this case. They can be expressed as follows: 1. Assuming the occupancy purpose requirements of section 14(c)(1) or (2) are met, can a permittee under a revocable permit be an occupant entitled to a reconveyance? 2. Assuming the occupancy purpose requirements of section 14(c)(1) or (2) are met, can one who occupies property which is subject to a revocable permit issued to another be an occupant entitled to a reconveyance? 3. Can the right to reconveyance under section 14(c)(1) or (2) be transferred subsequent to the occupancy date set forth in the Act? For the reasons that follow, our answers to these questions are: 1. Yes. 2. Yes, if the occupier has an equitable ownership interest in the improvement on the property on the legal occupancy date. 3. Yes. Because questions of fact exist concerning the equitable ownership interest of Capener and the local church, and concerning whether a transfer was intended from the Home Missions Department to Capener, we reverse the judgment of the superior court and remand this case for further proceedings.