Opinion ID: 355357
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Threats to Other Employees

Text: 68 The ALJ found that when Tipton was discharged, Watson told Pate to tell his men, in effect, that anyone else 'instigating' would be fired and that Pate transmitted the threat. The ALJ concluded that, in context, this amounted to a threat of discharge should employees engage in protected activity and, as such, was violative of Section 8(a)(1). The Board affirmed this finding and conclusion. Finding substantial evidence to support this finding, we enforce that portion of the Board's order relevant to the threat of discharge. NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc., 339 F.2d 498 (5th Cir. 1964). 69 ENFORCEMENT GRANTED IN PART, 70 DENIED IN PART.