Opinion ID: 1213759
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Mootness due to Dellarussiani judgment on counts I and II

Text: Because we affirm the district court's entry of judgment in the Dellarussiani plaintiffs' favor on counts I and II, any of the plaintiffs' corresponding claims in O'Brien  claims that they hope to maintain if the district court's decertification is reversed on appeal  are now moot. There is no longer a live controversy as to the FLSA and the corresponding Ohio wage-payment claim, Gottfried v. Med. Planning Servs., Inc., 280 F.3d 684, 691 (6th Cir. 2002), because there is no other relief that plaintiffs could obtain on those claims in O'Brien, given our overall affirmance of the district court's rulings in Dellarussiani and our remand of the attorney-fees issue in Dellarussiani.