Opinion ID: 2361751
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Faber's Offer of Sale to Emeryville

Text: Appellants argue that Faber's grant of the right of first refusal to Sun under the second lease signifies her repudiation of the previous West Penn lease. We disagree. As previously noted, Faber did not draft the agreement; Sun drafted the lease. Thus we cannot impute to Faber any such intention of repudiation. Rather, as stated previously, Faber signed a lease with ambiguous provisions, which, construed against the draftor, Sun, never became executory due to the sale of the premises to Emeryville. West Penn Realty Co. v. Acme Markets, Inc., 224 Pa.Super. 202, 303 A.2d 836 (1973). [6] Appellants also argue that Faber should be estopped from executing the agreement of sale with Emeryville in light of the intervening, fully paid, recorded rights of Sun Oil Company and its successors. Appellant's Brief at 27. However, because we hold that Sun's intervening rights were conditional and never became executory, we find no need to discuss the issue of estoppel. As to appellants' contention that they are entitled to dispossessory damages, we find this argument moot, in light of the determination that Sun had no right to enter into possession of the premises. Accordingly, we affirm the decree of the trial court.