Opinion ID: 1487492
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Alleged Insufficiency of the Evidence on Count I

Text: Rubino alleges that the evidence presented was insufficient to support his conviction on the first of the two counts of the indictment. However, the State produced competent evidence that Rubino had proscribed sexual contact with the victim in Lewiston between October 13, 1981, and December 12, 1986, when she turned fourteen. Her testimony was not unreasonable and the jury apparently found her to be a credible witness. Based on the evidence viewed in the light most favorable to the prosecution, the jury rationally could find beyond a reasonable doubt every element of the offense charged in Count I. See State v. Barry, 495 A.2d 825, 826 (Me. 1985). The entry is: Judgments affirmed. All concurring.