Opinion ID: 1407729
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 10

Heading: Compelling reasons for unequal distribution

Text: Gerhard's final argument is that [c]ompelling reasons exist for an unequal distribution of the community assets in favor of Gerhard. In support of this contention, Gerhard notes that Roberta's earning potential is double that of Gerhard's. Roberta, during the marriage, became educated, experienced and skilled at her career of mortgage brokering. Gerhard is, and was[,] a Nevada Highway Patrolman. While Roberta's income skyrocketed, Gerhard's income only moved upward on the State's schedule. We conclude that because this argument was not presented to the district court for consideration, this issue is considered waived on appeal. See Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. Brown, 97 Nev. 49, 52, 623 P.2d 981, 983 (1981).