Opinion ID: 2974575
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Center for Accessible Living

Text: As we previously noted, Center for Accessible Living’s asserted grounds for standing are far less established than the Fair Housing Council’s. The Plaintiffs claim that the Center for Accessible Living provided the testers for the Fair Housing Council, but they offer no proof that the Center for Accessible Living did anything more than identify individuals that might serve as potential testers. Indeed, the totality of Center for Accessible Living’s claimed injury - independent of the litigation - appears limited to its time spent rounding up three testers. In light of the fact that the Center for Accessible Living has failed to present evidence of its cost or time spent recruiting testers, we cannot conclude that the Center for Accessible Living has suffered a “concrete and particularized” injury. Sandusky Country Democratic Party v. Blackwell, 387 F.3d 565, 573 (6th Cir. 2004). Therefore, the Court finds that Article III prohibits the Center for Accessible Living from challenging Defendants’ conduct.