Opinion ID: 2602387
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: the cause should be remanded to the court of civil appeals for consideration of the issue raised in dunn's counter-appeal

Text: ¶ 23 Dunn also filed a counter-appeal in this case for review of the order setting the purge fee in the first contempt proceeding. Although the order finding Read guilty in the first contempt proceeding was not among the orders for which Read sought corrective relief, COCA nevertheless vacated that order. Because of that decision, COCA declined to review whether the purge fee was proper. It held that corrective relief is unavailable until the issue of Read's paternity and liability for child support shall have been determined. Today's pronouncement vacating COCA's opinion restores the issue raised by Dunn's counter-appeal. When this court vacates the opinion of the Court of Civil Appeals, it may address any issue properly raised in the appeal or remand the cause to the Court of Civil Appeals for that court to address that issue. [38] Whether the trial court erred in setting the purge fee should be reviewed in the first instance by the Court of Civil Appeals. We hence remand the cause to that court to address this issue.