Opinion ID: 698181
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Testimony regarding lack of repayments

Text: 19 During redirect examination, FBI Agent Fitzpatrick testified that he found no evidence of any repayments from Miller to Dolgaard, other than the $279,000 identified by Miller's attorney during cross-examination, and that he found no evidence that Dolgaard initiated any civil action to collect the amount owed. Miller now claims that the non-repayment testimony is hearsay. Because he did not make that objection at trial we review the admission only for plain error. United States v. Gomez, 908 F.2d 497, 500 (9th Cir.1990). 20 Fitzpatrick's testimony that he found no evidence of repayment is admissible under Rule of Evidence 1006 as a summary of Miller's bank records which were admitted into evidence. Moreover, any error would be harmless since it was essentially undisputed that Miller paid back less than half of the $650,000 he received from Dolgaard.