Opinion ID: 1654062
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 18

Heading: Counsel failed to have to have the court reporter record the jury selection process.

Text: ¶ 45. Davis next argues that Shaddock was ineffective for failure to have the court reporter fully record the jury selection process. Davis states that because such an error would have required the reversal of his sentence and a new trial, counsel was ineffective. However, this Court considered this allegation on direct appeal and found that there was no reversible error because Davis failed to show or attempt to show that he was prejudiced as a result, in that the loss of information would have revealed a violation of Davis's rights during jury selection. Davis, 684 So.2d at 651. Davis makes no further allegation here of what issues defense counsel would or should have raised had the entirety of the jury selection process been preserved. This issue is without merit.