Opinion ID: 6336322
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Fifth Issue

Text: Turner asserts “[t]he District Court[’s] adoption of the Appeals Administrators claim that because Petitioner was always in federal custody the BOP did not review 7 Appellate Case: 21-6151 Document: 010110677612 Date Filed: 04/29/2022 Page: 8 his sentence for a nunc pro tunc designation and denied his appeal is inconsistent with the record. In Turner I, Petitioner was released by the USM into the custody of the State of Missouri, without a writ.” Id. at 9. The magistrate judge noted not only that Turner was released on bond to Missouri officials, but also that the release on bond was in error. Moreover, the time in state custody ran concurrently with Turner’s federal sentence, so he spent no additional time in prison because of his state sentence or any erroneous release on bond. Turner fails to establish how further consideration of his release on bond would support his arguments for relief.