Opinion ID: 222293
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Jaso’s Civil Conspiracy Claim

Text: Jaso’s proposed second amended complaint included a claim for civil conspiracy under Texas law. Jaso makes only two oblique references to this claim on appeal, neither of which attempts to explain why it was not timebarred. Accordingly, Jaso has not properly briefed whether the district court erred in denying him leave to amend this claim, and we do not consider it. See FED. R. APP. P. 28(a)(9)(A); see also United States v. Scroggins, 599 F.3d 433, 446 (5th Cir. 2010) (“It is not enough to merely mention or allude to a legal theory.” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).