Opinion ID: 2599781
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Effect of Errors

Text: Defendant contends that the cumulative effect of error requires reversal of both guilt and penalty phase proceedings. However, as defendant has demonstrated few errors, and we have already found such errors or possible errors harmless, either individually or cumulative, `we likewise conclude that their cumulative effect does not warrant reversal of the judgment' ( People v. Panah, supra, 35 Cal.4th at pp. 479-480 [25 Cal.Rptr.3d 672, 107 P.3d 790].) ( People v. Jablonski supra, 37 Cal.4th at p. 837, 38 Cal.Rptr.3d 98,126 P.3d 938.) Defendant also argues that, were we to set aside any conviction or special circumstance finding, the entire matter must be remanded for a new sentencing hearing. As we have not done so, there is no basis for remand.