Opinion ID: 2362153
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: Superior Court's denial of Jackson's request for funding for forensic tests

Text: Jackson argues that the Superior Court abused its discretion by denying his request for state funds to conduct independent forensic tests. The decision to grant or deny funds for investigative services is within the discretion of the Superior Court. Jackson must show that the expenditure of public funds is reasonably necessary for the preparation of an adequate defense. We will not disturb the trial court's ruling unless there is a clear and convincing showing of substantial prejudice as a result of the denial of funds for investigative services. [19] Since Jackson presented no evidence of prejudice as a result of trial counsel's tactical decision not to conduct independent forensic tests, the Superior Court did not abuse its discretion by denying Jackson's request for postconviction funding to conduct similar tests.