Opinion ID: 1637489
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: WHETHER THE JUDGMENT OF FAULT DIVORCE IN SHAVERS v. SHAVERS IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND DENIES DEFENDANT DUE PROCESS OF LAW.

Text: ¶33. John asserts that the chancery court's rendition of a fault divorce on grounds against John E. Shavers in lieu of Irreconcilable Differences and No Fault, denies John E. Shavers his constitutional rights of `due process of law,' by the State of Mississippi, as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment, United States Constitution, and therefore the Judgment of Divorce on grounds of fault against John E. Shavers is unconstitutional, null and void. It is difficult to discern from John's brief the exact argument he is attempting to make concerning the alleged due-process violation. John does not cite any authority for his contention and we decline to address it. Armstrong, 618 So.2d at 1282. Further, John's argument again returns to the topic of the chancery court's jurisdiction pending federal removal. This issue was discussed previously and found to be without merit.