Opinion ID: 732381
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: 1992 and 1993 Agreements

Text: 40 Appellants argue that there is no evidence of the authenticity of the agreements and that mere negotiation and signing of the agreements (without implementation) cannot violate the injunction. 41 The authenticity of the agreements is an established and unchallenged fact found by the district court. The district court has made an unchallenged finding of fact that the Appellants entered into those agreements on behalf of the defendant Estate and themselves as heirs. It is true that the injunction did not explicitly forbid attempts to transfer assets of the Estate. The district court, however, found that the Appellants made a deal with the Republic to transfer and split the Estate assets. The district court was thus well within its discretion in finding that the 1992 and 1993 agreements violated the injunction.