Opinion ID: 1125693
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: The Ajas' Claim.

Text: The Ajas have attempted to hold Title liable in damages on the theory that Title breached its contract of title insurance that Title had issued to the Ajas. Such a position is wholly untenable. The Ajas conceded that they never intended to purchase Parcel B. They have suffered no loss because of the order decreeing reformation. Recovery is impossible, since compensable damages are nonexistent. See Garrison v. St. Louis & S.F. Ry. Co., 176 Kan. 548, 271 P.2d 307 (1954); Rosendahl v. Lesourd Methodist Church, 68 Wash.2d 180, 412 P.2d 109 (1966).