Opinion ID: 3045500
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: You tell us within 30 days after you

Text: acquire it that you want us to cover it for that coverage. The parties agree that “Symbol 7” was entered in the relevant part of the policy. Appellant, in response to Appellee’s claim for UIM benefits, filed a declaratory judgment action to determine its obligation under the insurance policy, ultimately taking the position that stacking of UIM benefits was waived, i.e., that the liability limit is $35,000. Appellee, on the other hand, argues that stacking does apply and that the liability limit is $105,000—$35,000 for each of the three vehicles covered by the policy. The District Court concluded that the June 6, 2001, stacking waiver was invalid because of the addition of new vehicles to the policy and thus granted summary judgment in favor of Appellee.