Opinion ID: 6103672
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Martinez-Torres

Text: In United States v. Martinez-Torres, we vacated a condition that prohibited the defendant from “viewing or possessing any material depicting or describing sexually explicit conduct or child pornography as defined in 18 U.S.C. § 2256.” 795 F.3d at 1236. We agreed with the defendant that the condition “involve[d] a greater deprivation of liberty than [wa]s necessary to deter criminal activity, protect the public, and promote his rehabilitation.” Id. at 1237. “The district court’s sole expressed reason for the condition was that Defendant had been convicted of a sex 9 Mr. Engelhart does not challenge the portion of the Sexual Material Prohibition that prohibits child pornography. Aplt. Br. at 11. 16 Appellate Case: 21-8007 Document: 010110632142 Date Filed: 01/14/2022 Page: 17 offense . . . . But that is not enough.” Id. Rather, we explained, the district court “needed to make an individualized assessment of whether it was appropriate for Defendant.” Id. Although it was “quite relevant that Defendant was a convicted sex offender,” the district court still “needed to explain why the restriction of legal sexually explicit material was supported by the statutory factors in this case.” Id. at 1238.