Opinion ID: 1033382
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Constitutionality of Search Warrant

Text: We first consider whether the search warrants issued for Harbison’s residence were sufficiently particular under the Fourth Amendment despite 2 Case: 12-11836 Date Filed: 07/10/2013 Page: 3 of 21 inclusion of an erroneous street address. Prior to trial, Harbison unsuccessfully moved to suppress the evidence seized during the search as well as any fruit derived from execution of the search warrants.1 We review a “district court’s denial of a defendant’s motion to suppress under a mixed standard of review, examining the district court’s findings of fact for clear error and the district court’s application of law to those facts de novo.” United States v. King, 509 F.3d 1338,