Opinion ID: 2623588
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Miscellaneous assignments of error

Text: Lobato also contends that the district court erred in admitting her statements to police in violation of Miranda, allowing the State to obtain and use privileged material from her medical files, restricting use of her expert on blood and crime-scene analysis based upon her failure to timely designate the expert before trial, excluding her alibi evidence for lack of timely pretrial notice, and allowing prosecutorial misconduct during final argument. We have considered these assignments of error and find them without merit. We note in passing that the failures to timely designate experts and alibi witnesses may be cured upon remand. [20] We also reject Lobato's remaining claims of error, including the assertion that NRS 201.450 [21] was unconstitutionally applied and is void for vagueness. [22]