Opinion ID: 481036
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: The Title VI Claims

Text: 21 Wrenn, appearing here pro se, first challenges the district court's dismissal of his Title VI claims on the irrelevant grounds that: 22 The decision of the District Court to dismissed [sic ] Appellant's Title VI claim is clearly in error.... [because] Appellant has attempted ... to exhaust the administrative remedies of Title VI. 23 The defendants did not, at any time, contend that the district court held that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. Rather, the district court dismissed the Title VI claims because Wrenn, through his attorney, recognized that the claims had no foundation and voluntarily consented to dismissal. 24 Now comes the plaintiff ... and submits the following by way of a response to defendant's [sic ] ... motion to dismiss plaintiff's Title VI claims.... [I]t appears that defendants' motion is well taken and should be granted. 25 The district court was well within its authority under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a) in accepting Wrenn's decision to dismiss. Plaintiff submits no reason for this court to set aside his volunteered dismissal, and we decline to do so.