Opinion ID: 2469348
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 15

Heading: Motion to Amend and Replead

Text: L-7 filed a motion to amend the judgment and replead on February 5, 2010 based on information contained in documents produced by Old Navy following the close of briefing on the Rule 12(c) motion. L-7 Motion to Amend and Replead at 1. The District Court denied the motion, reasoning that L-7 had already had two bites at the apple, as it has already filed two complaints; the request is untimely, as L-7 has had the documents for months yet never indicated a desire to amend its amended complaint prior to the granting of the motion for judgment on the pleadings; and, because the additional documents L-7 now seeks to rely on would not change the District Court's conclusions, the proposed amendment therefore would be futile. L-7 Designs, Inc. v. Old Navy, LLC, No. 09 Civ. 1432, 2010 WL 532160, at  (S.D.N.Y. Feb. 16, 2010). L-7 filed a timely notice of appeal on February 17, 2010.