Opinion ID: 2546313
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: [¶3] Moe lists these issues: 1. Is W.S. § 14-3-105 facially unconstitutional? 2. Is W.S. § 14-3-105 unconstitutional as applied in petitioner's case? 3. Did the trial court err in refusing to admit the statements of an unavailable witness for the defense, resulting in a denial of petitioner's rights to present his defense and confront witnesses? 4. Did the prosecutor commit misconduct in closing argument? The State rephrases the issues in this way: I. Is Wyoming's indecent liberties statute, Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-3-105, unconstitutional on its face? II. Is Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 14-3-105 unconstitutional as applied in this case? III. Did the trial court abuse its discretion when it refused to admit the hearsay statements of an unavailable witness for the defense? IV. Did the prosecutor commit misconduct in his closing argument?