Opinion ID: 2586477
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 10

Heading: Defendant Elsie L. Braunstein's Answers to Plaintiff's First Interrogatories

Text: [¶ 34] In Braunstein's answers she testified in pertinent part that she and her husband did not cause fencing to be done on the disputed property (answer to Interrogatory No. 17); they last ran livestock or caused livestock to be run on the disputed property in March of 2005 (answer to Interrogatory No. 18); no one has ever resided on the disputed property (answer to Interrogatory No. 19); she has never traveled to and viewed the disputed property (answer to Interrogatory No. 20); her husband never traveled to and viewed the property (answer to Interrogatory No. 21); and her allegation in paragraph 3 of her counterclaim that plaintiff keeps [you] ou[t] of possession of the property is based on [t]he plaintiff sued me alleging that the plaintiff owns the property and asking the court to enjoin me from entering the property (answer to Interrogatory No. 22). [¶ 35] We find nothing in these answers that shows the absence of any genuine issue of material fact associated with the elements of Robinson's adverse possession claim.