Opinion ID: 2630451
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: [¶ 2] 1. Whether the district court abused its discretion or violated the appellant's constitutional right to confrontation in allowing an investigator to testify, over a hearsay objection, that the murder victim earlier had reported that the appellant had threatened him? 2. Whether the district court abused its discretion or violated the appellant's constitutional right to confrontation in allowing an investigator to testify, over relevancy and unfair prejudice objections, that the murder victim had reported that the appellant had sexually assaulted him? 3. Whether the district court committed plain error in allowing witness Martinez to testify about statements made to him by nonwitness Hicks? 4. Whether the district court abused its discretion in denying the appellant's motion for a change of venue?