Opinion ID: 768183
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: 10 Standing is a question of law reviewed de novo. See Schultz v. PLM Int'l, Inc., 127 F.3d 1139, 1141 (9th Cir. 1997). Summary judgment is also reviewed de novo. See Robi v. Reed, 173 F.3d 736, 739 (9th Cir. 1999). Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party,[we] determine[ ] whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the relevant substantive law. Id. The district court's interpretation of ERISA is a question of law reviewed de novo. Wetzel v. Lou Ehlers Cadillac Group Long Term Disability Ins. Program, 189 F.3d 1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1999). The district court's findings of fact are reviewed for clear err. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(a); Lawyer v. Department of Justice, 521 U.S. 567, 580 (1997).