Opinion ID: 3014453
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: jurisdiction

Text: substantial proof of the We exercise plenary review in charge pending against the determining whether a court defendant. hierarchically below us had subject There do not appear to be any matter jurisdiction. Wujick v. Dale & cases—either from this Court or from the Dale, Inc., 43 F.3d 790, 792 (3d Cir. Appellate Division—considering this 1994) (citing Nat’l Union Fire Ins. Co. v. provision in any depth.11 We are, City Savings, F.S.B., 28 F.3d 376, 383 (3d Cir. 1994)). As previously noted, we look to local law to determine the 11 jurisdiction of the Appellate Division. The government points to the one See 48 U.S.C. § 1613a(a); Gov’t of V.I. v. case of the Appellate Division which Warner, 48 F.3d 688 (3d Cir. 1995). The expressly stated that that Court had asserted basis for the Appellate jurisdiction under section 39(a)(1), Division’s subject matter jurisdiction is 4 Government of the Virgin Islands v. V.I. Code § 39(a)(1), which provides: Christopher, 990 F. Supp. 391 (D.V.I.