Opinion ID: 2804906
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Unlawful pre-arraignment delay claim

Text: [T]he Fourth Amendment provides the proper analytical framework for claims related to police activities that allegedly prolonged [arrestees'] postarrest detention[s]. Bryant v. City of New York, 404 F.3d 128, 136 (2d Cir. 2005). Because the plaintiffs were arraigned within 48 hours, any pre-arraignment delay the plaintiffs experienced was presumptively reasonable. See id. at 137-38. The plaintiffs failed to rebut this presumption: The plaintiffs have not shown that their arraignments were delayed by ill will, delay for delay's sake, officers' attempts to gather more evidence against them, Cnty. of Riverside v. McLaughlin, 500 U.S. 44, 56 (1991), or any other extraordinary circumstances, Bryant, 404 F.3d at 138.