Opinion ID: 2470
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Precision's Motion to Amend

Text: By pleadings filed pursuant to Rule 52(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Precision requested that the district court amend its findings of facts and conclusions of law in two respects  arguing that the district court had inadvertent[ly] reduced its damages by the amount of the Additional Berardi Payment, Precision Stone II, 2007 WL 1975487, at , 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49274, at , and that the court erred in failing to award pre-judgment interest on the amount due, id. at , 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49274, at . By opinion and order dated July 6, 2007, the district court declined to alter its damages calculation, but granted Precision's request for pre-judgment interest. Id. at -, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 49274, at -. This appeal followed.