Opinion ID: 1831577
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: was walker denied effective assistance of counsel by his trial counsel's failure to conduct a constitutionally adequate voir dire examination of the jury venire within the meaning of strickland v. washington and in violation of his sixth and eighth amendment rights as guaranteed under the united states constitution and the relevant

Text: PORTIONS OF THE MISSISSIPPI CONSTITUTION. IX. WAS THE SENTENCE RENDERED AGAINST WALKER DISPROPORTIONATE TO THAT OF HIS CO DEFENDANT, JASON RISER, IN VIOLATION OF THE EIGHTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES AND THE CORRESPONDING PORTIONS OF THE MISSISSIPPI CONSTITUTION. X. WAS WALKER DENIED HIS RIGHTS GUARANTEED BY THE FIFTH, SIXTH, EIGHTH AND FOURTEENTH AMENDMENTS TO THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION AND MISSISSIPPI LAW DUE TO THE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF THE ERRORS AT HIS CAPITAL TRIAL.