Opinion ID: 1447591
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Approved Salt Lake Real Estate Board

Text: The lower court found that Mr. Price was advised of this transaction; that he stated it was acceptable to him and he approved the terms; and that the signatures of the women were not conditional upon Mr. Price signing subsequently. The parties recognized that the transaction could not be consummated until the signature of Mr. Price was obtained. In the course of frequent solicitations by Hansen, Price manifested his intention to sign. One particular telephone call by Hansen to Price plays an important part in this action. The plaintiff was anxious to purchase a small strip of land bordering the defendants' property belonging to one Terry, which strip was to be utilized as a railroad spur, in connection with the Price property. Before purchasing this Terry Strip, plaintiff wanted full assurance that Mr. Price would complete the sale of defendants' property in compliance with his oral promise. Mr. Hansen, therefore, called Mr. Price, and according to the testimony of Hansen, the following conversation ensued: Answer: [by Hansen] Yes, I called Harry [Price] and I said: `Now it looks like everything is okey and I just want to be sure there won't be any backing out, because I don't want to close the deal on the Terry property.   ' I told Harry that, and then after the first part of September, or the last part of September, I told him we were ready to close that now.