Opinion ID: 2617549
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: Appellant presents the following issues for our review: I. Where uncontroverted evidence was presented that the Teton County Library is used by citizens for the purposes of amusement and diversion, was appellant entitled to summary judgment on the issue of whether the Teton County Library was a recreation area within the meaning of Wyoming Statute § 1-39-106? II. Where the trial court submitted to the jury a special verdict form and provided instruction that the form was to [be] completed by the jury, was it reversible error for the trial court to accept an incomplete verdict from the jury which failed [to answer] certain    questions submitted? III. Should a trial court allow an attorney jointly representing two defendants to present inconsistent defenses at trial on behalf of those defendants? Appellees restate the issues: I. Whether the characterization of the location of plaintiff's fall near the improvements known as the Teton County Library building and grounds was a building, recreation area or public park within the meaning of Wyoming Statute § 1-39-106 or as a sidewalk within the meaning of Wyoming Statute § 1-39-120 was an issue of fact or law. II. Whether the location of plaintiff's fall near the improvements known as the Teton County Library building and grounds was a recreation area within the meaning of Wyoming Statute § 1-39-106. III. Whether, assuming arguendo, the Teton County Library building and grounds was a recreation area within the meaning of Wyoming Statute § 1-39-106, the jury verdict would have been different. IV. Whether answers to special interrogatories numbers 1 and 2 relating to the characterization of the location of the fall were necessary to the rendition of a complete and proper verdict. V. Whether the trial court properly denied [appellant's] motion to disallow testimony for alleged ethical violations. VI. Whether, assuming arguendo, any of appellant's points on appeal are meritorious, appellant has designated a sufficient record to support any claim for reversible error.