Opinion ID: 2716505
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Duque's unexhausted arguments

Text: The BIA found, correctly, that Duque failed to raise before it several challenges to the IJ's findings. Specifically, Duque failed to challenge before the BIA: the IJ's adverse credibility findings of Duque's testimony and that of his witnesses; the IJ's finding that Duque failed to satisfy his burden of proof showing that he entered into his marriage with Gladys in good faith; and the IJ's denial of his application for voluntary departure. Unfortunately for Duque, his failure to raise these challenges with the BIA deprives this court of jurisdiction to review them. Jing Qing Wu v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 2013); see also Sombah v. Mukasey, 529 F.3d 49, 52 (1st Cir. 2008) (stating that claims not presented to the BIA are not reviewable). We need go no further.