Opinion ID: 2773045
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Terry Jordan

Text: ¶ 39 Mr. Jordan did not meet with Mr. Campbell until after Mr. Campbell had terminated his relationship with HTK. Mr. Jordan argues that Mr. Campbell had given him a business card identifying HTK, that HTK was aware of Mr. Jordan‘s relationship with FSFG, and that knowledge amounted to a manifestation of authority. As with Ms. Turner, we find that the business card alone is not sufficient. For example, Mr. Jordan ―did not open a regular account with [the principal], [he] did not send [his] checks to the brokerage, and [he] never received a single receipt, statement, or other communication bearing [the principal]‘s name.‖34 Thus, Mr. Jordan has not presented sufficient evidence to generate a genuine issue of material fact regarding HTK‘s manifestation of authority. Therefore, we affirm the district court‘s grant of summary judgment for HTK.