Opinion ID: 602236
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Kenton Lee Thompson

Text: 7 Mr. Thompson contends that the district court erred by not specifically enforcing his plea agreement with the government. Alternatively, he argues that the court should not have enhanced his sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1) for possession of a firearm. 8 As part of the plea agreement, the government agreed not to recommend a two level enhancement for possession of a firearm. At sentencing, the court stated explicitly that Mr. Thompson's sentence did not include an enhancement for possession of a firearm. The government thus complied with the plea agreement, and Mr. Thompson did not in fact receive an enhancement for possession of a firearm. His sentence is AFFIRMED. 9 Mr. Thompson's counsel, W Mark McKnight, has moved to withdraw on the grounds that this appeal is wholly frivolous. Because we agree that the appeal is entirely without merit, Mr. McKnight's motion is GRANTED.