Opinion ID: 3173760
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: “We review de novo motions to dismiss and motions for judgment on the pleadings. The standard is the same for both. Viewing the facts in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, a motion to dismiss or for a judgment on the pleadings should not be granted if a complaint provides ‘enough facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’ Moreover, the complaint must allege ‘more than label and conclusions,’ ‘a formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action will not do,’ and ‘factual allegations must be enough to raise a right to relief above the speculative level.’” Jebaco, Inc. v. Harrah’s Operating Co., Inc., 587 F.3d 314, 318 (5th Cir. 2009) (internal citations omitted).