Opinion ID: 1753985
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: SHOULD THIS COURT OVERTURN TINNIN V. FIRST UNITED BANK OF MISSISSIPPI, 502 So.2d 659 (MISS. 1987)?

Text: All of the arguments made under this assignment of error were the arguments advanced by the Tinnins and answered by this Court in Tinnin I. We decline to answer them in Tinnin II any differently than we did in Tinnin I. This assignment of error is without merit. In conclusion, we find that there is no merit to the assignments of error and the judgment of the lower court should be affirmed. AFFIRMED. ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON, ANDERSON, PITTMAN and BLASS, JJ., concur.