Opinion ID: 1657165
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: the search of soca's trailer

Text: In this case, none of the parties contend that the State did not have the opportunity to seek a search warrant. To the contrary, the record indicates that the prosecutor made a conscious choice not to seek a warrant and instead allow the search to be conducted pursuant to the supervisory authority granted probation supervisors in Grubbs. Soca does not dispute the fact that the evidence seized during the search of his parents' trailer could be used against him in probation violation proceedings. The State acknowledges the holding of Grubbs and further acknowledges that the Department of Corrections (DOC) has codified the Grubbs rule in its Community Control Implementation Manual (hereinafter CCIM ). [2] In this case, the search of Soca's trailer was carried out by probation authorities in a manner consistent with DOC procedures and, as all parties agree, in accord with Grubbs.