Opinion ID: 2655961
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: We review de novo the district court's dismissal of Maloy's complaint. A.G. ex rel. Maddox v. Elsevier, Inc., 732 F.3d 77, 80 (1st Cir. 2013). In deciding whether the district court properly dismissed a claim, we ask whether the complaint state[s] a claim to relief that is plausible on its face, accepting the plaintiff's factual allegations and drawing all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor. Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). To cross the plausibility threshold, the plaintiff must plead[] factual content that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the misconduct alleged. Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009).