Opinion ID: 3151285
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Consideration of Possible Appeal Points

Text: Nothing in defense counsel’s brief or the record suggests an error in the guideline calculation, and the sentence fell within the guideline range. As a result, the sentence is presumptively reasonable in length. See United States v. Trent, 767 F.3d 1046, 1051 (10th Cir. 2014), cert. denied, __ U.S. __, 135 S. Ct. 1447 (2015). This presumption is rebuttable, but Mr. Fitzpatrick bears the burden of showing that the sentence is unreasonable under the sentencing factors in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Kristl, 437 F.3d 1050, 1054 (10th Cir. 2006) (per curiam). He has not filed anything to satisfy that burden.