Opinion ID: 1882035
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: whether the trial court erred in failing to excuse for cause jurors sherry sam and constance parham?

Text: ¶ 39. Crawford argues the trial judge erred in failing to dismiss for cause two of the jurors, Sherry Sam and Constance Parham. He claims that both jurors demonstrated a bias in favor of police officers as witnesses. Crawford's brief cites relevant case law that potentially substantiates his argument; however, neither juror was challenged for cause in the trial court. In fact, Crawford's counsel specifically accepted both of them as jurors. Thus neither juror may be challenged at this level. Evans v. State, 725 So.2d 613 (Miss.1997); Jaco v. State, 574 So.2d 625 (Miss.1990). This assignment of error is without merit.