Opinion ID: 2679985
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Paper Streets Statute

Text: [¶14] Because the easements were established by the codicil in 1956, in addition to being recorded on the 1915 Plan, it is not necessary to reach whether 23 M.R.S. § 3031(2), of the Paper Streets Act, 23 M.R.S. §§ 3027, 3031-3035 (2012); 33 M.R.S. § 460, 469-A (2012), applies in this case. The entry is: Judgment vacated in part. Remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. 9 On the briefs: Alan E. Shepard, Esq., Shepard & Read, Kennebunk, for appellants Helen Rivas Rose and Nathaniel P. Merrill Richard A. Hull III, Esq., and Reid Hayton-Hull, Esq., Hull Law Office, LLC, Biddeford, for appellee Mary Elizabeth Fluke Jens-Peter Bergen, Esq., Kennebunk, for appellee Llewellyn P.H. Alden Kelly W. McDonald, Esq., and Peter S. Plumb, Esq., Murray, Plumb & Murray, Portland, for appellees William Parsons Jr., et al. At oral argument: Alan E. Shepard, Esq., appellants Helen Rivas Rose and Nathaniel P. Merrill Kelly W. McDonald, Esq., for appellees William Parsons Jr., et al. York County Superior Court docket number RE-2011-56 FOR CLERK REFERENCE ONLY