Opinion ID: 1268047
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: licensing provisions

Text: Centaur next contends that certain licensing provisions fail to satisfy the requirement that they be narrowly tailored to serve the County's interest. Specifically, Centaur argues that § 8A-5(3) vests the Zoning Administrator with unfettered discretion to deny licenses when an applicant fails to supply information reasonably necessary for their issuance. We disagree. The Ordinance provides the Administrator with a standard susceptible of objective measurement, thus adequately circumscribing his discretion. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas , 837 F. (2d) 1298 (5th Cir.1988), rev'd on other grounds , ___ U.S. ___, 110 S.Ct. 596, 107 L.Ed. (2d) 603 (1990). [4] Centaur further contends the provisions covering suspension and revocation of licenses are not narrowly tailored. These provisions, however, are not substantially broader than necessary to achieve the [County's] interest. Ward v. Rock Against Racism , ___ U.S. ___, ___, 109 S.Ct. 2746, 2758, 105 L.Ed. (2d) 661, 681 (1989). We uphold their constitutionality.