Opinion ID: 786073
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: We will concede those allegations.

Text: 19 Q. Okay. You concede that they constitute crimes involving moral turpitude then? 20 A. Ah, yes. 21 (App. at 124.) 22 On the same day, October 11, 2001, the IJ issued an oral decision concluding that Nugent was subject to removal as an aggravated felon. The IJ then added: Further, in court today counsel has conceded the allegations set forth in the I-261. The Court finds the respondent is subject to removal as charged therein. (App. at 80.) As set forth above, the Form I-261 added paragraphs 6 and 7 in which the INS listed Nugent's 1984 conviction for theft by unlawful taking and referenced his 2000 conviction for theft by deception. Thus, the two crimes involving moral turpitude consisted of theft by deception, conviction date November 28, 2000, as contained in the INS' Allegation No. 4 in the original Notice to Appear, and theft by unlawful taking, conviction date January 30, 1984, as contained in the INS' Allegation Nos. 6 and 7 in the Form I-261. The IJ specifically ordered Nugent removed from the United States based on convictions for both the aggravated felony listed in the Notice to Appear and the two crimes of moral turpitude listed in the Form I-261, Additional Charges of Inadmissibility/Deportability. 23 Nugent appealed the IJ's decision to the BIA, and on November 18, 2002, the BIA affirmed the IJ's decision without opinion, thereby adopting the IJ's decision as the final agency determination. Nugent timely appealed the BIA's order.