Opinion ID: 1163193
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: professional responsibility tribunal's report

Text: After considering all the evidentiary material and the testimony of the witnesses, the PRT recommended that Brown be denied reinstatement. The PRT found that Brown possesses good moral character, has not engaged in the unauthorized practice of law, and possesses the requisite learning to practice law. Further, the PRT commended Brown for his efforts. However, the PRT stated: the serious nature of misconduct and the exceptional number of such occurrences which admittedly resulted in disrepute upon the legal profession, weighs heavily toward declining readmission. The PRT also found it practically inconceivable that conduct of [Brown] extending generally over a two-year period could result in this number of grievances and alleged breach of such numerous professional and public responsibilities. [I]n view of the scope and circumstances of [Brown's] transgressions, the PRT found it difficult to believe that Brown had never intended personal gain.