Opinion ID: 1150032
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 8

Heading: remaining points on appeal

Text: We reject without discussion Hildwin's other arguments: (1) that the trial judge should have instructed the jury as to the minimum and maximum possible penalties; (2) that a witness who had not explicitly testified to a lack of present recollection should not have been permitted to read from notes taken at the time of a conversation; (3) that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the jury's finding of guilt; (4) that the testimony of a state witness regarding his criminal record was improper; (5) that the state should have been required to furnish criminal records of all its witnesses; (6) that the death penalty was unconstitutionally imposed because the jury did not consider the elements that statutorily define the crimes for which the death penalty may be imposed; (7) that the jury instructions on aggravating and mitigating circumstances were misleading; and (8) that the sentencing order was not specific enough. As we find no merit in any of appellant's arguments, we affirm the judgment of guilt and sentence of death. It is so ordered. EHRLICH, C.J., and OVERTON, McDONALD, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. BARKETT, J., concurs in result only.