Opinion ID: 419602
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: statutory violation

Text: 7 The thrust of this appeal is directed at the calculation of damages, not the finding of liability. NET denies that there were any deliberate misallocations, which, if strictly true, would preclude a finding of liability as well as damages. But the jury had before it evidence of troubled relations between Edwards and NET, of possible harassment by NET, and of a sudden and entirely unexplained disparity between the allocations to Edwards and those to Dube immediately after the Alliance issued its list of demands. NET provided at trial no very clear explanation of the disparity in allocations. 3 Based on the evidence presented to it, it was open to the jury to conclude that NET had engaged in action which is arbitrary, in bad faith, or unconscionable and had failed to deliver reasonable quantities of automobiles in violation of subsections (I) and (III) of N.H.Rev.Stat.Ann. Sec. 357C:3.