Opinion ID: 1170699
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: foreclosure against the entire 200 acres

Text: Appellants contend the extent of the lien foreclosures was too broad in that the court did not find what portion of the land in question was benefited as required by I.C. § 45-505 as applied in Idaho Lumber & Hardware Co. v. DiGiancomo, 61 Idaho 383, 102 P.2d 637 (1940). That case concerned foreclosure of a materialman's lien against a structure which had been erected on the land. This Court applied the statute's requirement that the lien be only against the building together with the land necessary for the convenient use and occupation of the dwelling for which the materials were furnished. That statutory restraint is not applicable here where there was no specific structure erected. The court below found work had been performed on 200 acres of land. This would indicate that the three parcels have been benefited as a farming unit as well as each specific area. See : Durfee v. Parker, 90 Idaho 118, 410 P.2d 962 (1965). Appellants have not pointed to any error in the property descriptions in the judgments, and therefore we presume the descriptions of the property in the judgments were accurate.