Opinion ID: 203237
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: standard of review

Text: When considering challenges to a district court's denial of a motion to suppress, we ordinarily review findings of fact for clear error and conclusions of law de novo. United States v. Meada, 408 F.3d 14, 20 (1st Cir. 2005). Under clear error review, we may reverse only if the record, read as a whole, gives rise to a 'strong, unyielding belief that a mistake has been made.' C.G. ex rel. A.S. v. Five Town Cmty. Sch. Dist., 513 F.3d 279, 285 (1st Cir. 2008) (quoting Lenn v. Portland Sch. Comm., 998 F.2d 1083, 1087 (1st Cir. 1993)).