Opinion ID: 1484115
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Count II Charges: Respondent's Response to Bar Counsel's Investigation

Text: These charges allege that Respondent: (1) Seriously interfered with the administration of justice in violation of Rule 8.4(d); (2) Knowingly failed to respond reasonably to a lawful demand for information from a disciplinary authority in violation of Rule 8.1(b); and (3) Failed to comply with an order of the Board in violation of D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3). The Committee concluded that Bar Counsel failed to prove by clear and convincing evidence that Respondent violated Rule 8.4(d), but did prove that she violated Rule 8.1(b) and D.C. Bar R. XI, § 2(b)(3). The Board concludes there was sufficient proof on all three of these counts.