Opinion ID: 1897744
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: the cumulative effect of the assigned errors was to deprive appellant of his fundamental right to a fair trial.

Text: The appellant contends before this Court that Error IV stated above stems from the last two sentences of the State's closing argument to the jury, which follows: Do R.J. Herrington justice, do his family justice, by returning a verdict of guilty to what this man is charged with. Thank you. We simply dispose of this assigned error with the note that no objection was made to such argument before the court below, and it will not now be considered by this Court, and there is no merit in it. Shavers v. State, 455 So.2d 1299 (Miss. 1984); In Re: Hill, 460 So.2d 792 (Miss. 1984). The appellant contends finally that the cumulative effect of the errors he has assigned in this Court deprived him of his fundamental right to a fair trial. There is no merit in assigned Error V, and it is denied. There being no reversible errors presented to this Court from the trial below, the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. AFFIRMED. HAWKINS and DAN M. LEE, P.JJ., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON, GRIFFIN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur.