Opinion ID: 148165
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: standard of review

Text: We generally review a district court's denial of a motion for relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b) only for an abuse of discretion. Massi v. Walgreen Co., 337 Fed.Appx. 542, 545 (6th Cir.2009) (citing Davis v. Jellico Cmty. Hosp., Inc., 912 F.2d 129, 133 (6th Cir.1990)). When this Court reviews for abuse of discretion, it will reverse only when it is firmly convinced that a mistake has been made. Bush v. Rauch, 38 F.3d 842, 848 (6th Cir.1994) (internal citations omitted). To overcome this deferential standard of review over a motion for relief from judgment, a party must demonstrate that the district court committed a clear error of judgment, such as applying the incorrect legal standard, misapplying the correct legal standard, or relying upon clearly erroneous findings of fact. In re Ferro Corp. Derivative Litig., 511 F.3d 611, 623 (6th Cir.2008).