Opinion ID: 2224144
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: conclusion

Text: The commission concludes: 1. That the fill as described is material placed on the bed of Plum Lake and constitutes a violation of section 30.12, Statutes. 2. That the fill is an obstruction to navigation in Plum Lake and, as such, is a violation of section 30.15, Statutes. 3. That in accordance with the foregoing findings of fact, it has authority under section 30.03 (4), Statutes, to determine that the fill as located on the bed of Plum Lake is a violation of sections 30.12 and 30.15, Statutes. The order issued August 27, 1964 in Docket No. 2-WP-1961 and served upon F. C. Hixon and others on said day has become final and is not subject to attack in any court.