Opinion ID: 2508188
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 10

Heading: Jurors Who Testified Were Credible and Truthful

Text: Davis maintains the trial court erred by finding [a]ll of the jurors who testified at the reference hearing were credible and truthful. [61] The sole basis for Davis's challenge is juror Dasher's testimony at the reference hearing wherein she explained away the previous declaration she provided Davis stating she had seen him in restraints. According to Davis Dasher either perjured herself when she signed the first declaration or she was so casual about the oath that there is no reason to believe her at the hearing. [62] However, there is nothing in Dasher's testimony at the reference hearing itself to give rise to a substantial reason to question her credibility and truthfulness. Furthermore, a trial court's determination of a witness's credibility cannot be disturbed on appeal. [63] Thus, the trial court did not err by finding the jurors who testified at the reference hearing were credible and truthful.