Opinion ID: 565192
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: conclusion

Text: 48 Accordingly, the district court's findings of infringement under the doctrine of equivalents and lack of willfulness are affirmed. With respect to the district court's interest award, we hold that it did not err in awarding prejudgment interest at the prime rate compounded daily and in denying prejudgment interest for the period between May 27, 1977 and June 17, 1981. We vacate the judgment as to the quantum of damages for lost profits and remand for the entry of a judgment for damages that reflects Rudkin-Wiley's lost profits on all of Uniroyal's infringing sales. We have considered the parties' other arguments and conclude that they are without merit. COSTS 49 Each party shall bear its own costs. 50 AFFIRMED-IN-PART, VACATED-IN-PART, AND REMANDED.