Opinion ID: 1109409
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: did the trial court err in making any ruling which granted litigation costs to the appellee?

Text: It is not clear to this Court why this is assigned as error, since Dr. Hawkins concedes that the trial judge in the trial transcript as part of this appeal record does not address litigational costs. The defendant also does not even address the issue of attorney's fees in her brief. Therefore, it is the opinion of this Court that this issue does not merit discussion at this point. Therefore, for the above cited reasons, it is the opinion of this Court that the decision of the trial court should be reversed and the case remanded for a new trial on the original and amended bills. REVERSED AND REMANDED. ROY NOBLE LEE, C.J., HAWKINS, P.J., and ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON, PITTMAN and BLASS, JJ., concur. DAN M. LEE, P.J., not participating.