Opinion ID: 6356912
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Manifestation of an Extreme Indifference to the Value of Human Life

Text: [¶ 18] Aggravated assault, as alleged against Matthews, is proved by evidence that he intentionally, knowingly or recklessly cause[d] ... [b]odily injury to another under circumstances manifesting an extreme indifference to the value of human life. 17-A M.R.S. § 208(1)(C). Section 208(1)(C) provides that [s]uch circumstances include, but are not limited to, the number, location or nature of the injuries, the manner or method inflicted, [and] the observable physical condition of the victim. We have interpreted the extreme indifference element to mean that death or serious bodily injury was reasonably likely to result from the defendant's conduct under the circumstances. State v. Dodd , 503 A.2d 1302 , 1304-06 (Me. 1986). Matthews does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence of the mens rea or bodily injury elements. [¶ 19] Contrary to Matthews's contention, there is sufficient record evidence to support the extreme indifference element-namely, the testimony of the victim and the treating physician regarding the numerous fractures and other injuries to the victim's head and face; the treating physician's testimony that the injuries could have been more serious, including permanent impairment, given the amount of force that was used on the victim; and the bouncer's and patron's testimony that Matthews repeatedly struck the victim after the victim had fallen to the ground and appeared to be unconscious. See State v. Cunningham , 1998 ME 167 , ¶¶ 2-4, 715 A.2d 156 ; State v. Porter , 1997 ME 74 , ¶¶ 6-7, 693 A.2d 743 ; Dodd , 503 A.2d at 1304-06 .