Opinion ID: 2632604
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: [¶2] PRR articulates its issue on appeal as follows: A. Did the district court err in finding a prescriptive easement in favor of the plaintiff? 1. Did the court err in finding sufficient proof of adverse use by the plaintiffs? a. The Wyoming approach b. Other states approach 2. Did the district court err in finding the plaintiffs claimed the defendant's property under a claim of right or color of title? 3. Did the district court err in finding use of a kind as to put the owner of the subservient estate on notice [a] claim existed? a. The Maycock incident b. Installation of cattle guard c. Disagreement over placement of a chain on cattle guard 4. Did the district court err in finding continuous and uninterrupted use for ten years? The Michelenas offer a more succinct statement of the issue: Did the District Court err when it found that the use of the Kinney Divide Road by the Plaintiffs/Appellees was adverse, under claim of right, as opposed to permissive?