Opinion ID: 607457
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Senior's Conviction for Possession With Intent to Distribute.

Text: 41 At trial, the evidence that Senior was selling crack cocaine came largely from the testimony of Parris and the Randolphs, Senior's coconspirators. Senior asserts that these witnesses were unworthy of belief, and were contradicted by the testimony of Senior's lone witness, who claimed that Senior was merely a user, not a dealer. As discussed in connection with Senior's challenge to her conspiracy conviction, the jury found the government's witnesses credible, and we will not second-guess the jury's acceptance of this corroborated testimony. See, e.g., Russell, 971 F.2d at 1109. Moreover, based on the large quantity of crack found in Senior's apartment, approximately 150 grams, and the handscales, the jury could have inferred that Senior was holding the contraband to distribute, not merely for personal use. See, e.g., United States v. Bell, 954 F.2d 232, 235 (4th Cir. 1992) (holding that 13 plus grams of crack was quantity sufficient to support inference of intent to distribute).