Opinion ID: 1196774
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Whether Mills's Sentence Was Procedurally Unreasonable

Text: We doubt that Mills's sentence was imposed in a procedurally unreasonable manner. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007) (The sentencing judge should set forth [reasoning] enough to satisfy the appellate court that he has considered the parties' arguments and has a reasoned basis for exercising his own legal decisionmaking authority.); see also United States v. Villafuerte, 502 F.3d 204, 210 (2d Cir.2007) (stating that although [n]on-frivolous arguments for a non-Guidelines sentence may require some discussion, we do not insist that the district court address every argument the defendant has made or discuss every § 3553(a) factor individually). Inasmuch as we are remanding for resentencing, however, this is not an issue we need resolve.