Opinion ID: 1085121
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Administrative Record

Text: Shelkofsky also attacks the Administrative Record directly. He alleges the record cannot support the judgment because it is deficient in certain material respects; he asserts the record is uncertified, undated, missing pages, and missing documents. The Government responds that Shelkofsky’s complaints of deficiencies in the Administrative Record were either immaterial, or not presented to the Claims Court, and therefore, waived. We agree. Shelkofsky does not identify any material finding of the AFBCMR that lacks substantial evidentiary support in the record. He alleges that the record is missing documents regarding advice on severance pay and the AFBCMR’s consideration of the non-revocation statute. As noted above, however, the documents regarding the advice on severance pay and non-revocation are not relevant to any properly preserved claim. Shelkofsky is not seeking severance pay in this appeal and he failed to raise the non-revocation argument before the AFBCMR. Further, Shelkofsky has not established that the missing documents, or any other listed deficiency, affected the AFBCMR’s decision. We find accordingly, that any gaps in the Administrative Record had no impact on the decisions below.