Opinion ID: 3007694
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: We review de novo the district court’s dismissal for failure to state a claim, accepting all factual allegations in the complaint as true and construing them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff. Wiersum v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 785 F.3d 483, 485 (11th Cir. 2015). To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must allege sufficient “facts to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570, 127 S. Ct. 1955, 1974 (2007). We review a district court’s determination that federal law preempts state law de novo. Stansell v. Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colom., 771 F.3d 713, 725 (11th Cir. 2014). 1 Motions to amend Lu’s complaint to cure pleading defects in regard to the subject matter jurisdiction of this Court and to file out of time were granted on July 24, 2015 and August 5, 2015, respectively. 3 Case: 15-11927 Date Filed: 10/06/2015 Page: 4 of 11