Opinion ID: 560256
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Authority of Agency Relationship

Text: 13 Plaintiff submitted no evidence to indicate Jack Jamison's agency relationship with SFC aided in the sexual harassment or contributed to it. Jamison was not Ms. Toliver's direct supervisor and the record provides no evidence that he used any supervisory authority over plaintiff. See Hirschfeld, 916 F.2d at 579. The record is devoid of even the slightest implication that Jack Jamison ever took, or threatened to take disciplinary action against Ms. Toliver. Id. at 579-80 n. 7. For these reasons, the undisputed facts lead to the conclusion that the district court's disposition was correct. 14 Accordingly, the judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Oklahoma is AFFIRMED. Appellee is directed to file any request for costs in accordance with Fed.R.App.P. 39.