Opinion ID: 567132
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Refusal of Credit for Time Served

Text: 12 Moya argues the district court erred by refusing to credit him for forty days he served in custody on the counterfeiting charges. Moya contends he is entitled to credit under 18 U.S.C. §§ 3585 and 3568. 13 Section 3585 does not entitle Moya to the credit he seeks. Under section 3585, Moya is entitled to credit only for time served for the failure to appear offense, or for any offense for which he was arrested after failing to appear. The forty days credit Moya seeks was not served for the failure to appear offense. It was served as a result of the counterfeiting charges before he failed to appear for trial. 14 Moya also is not entitled to credit under section 3568. This section was repealed and is not applicable to offenses committed after November 1, 1987. Pub.L. No. 98-473, § 212(a)(2), 98 Stat. 1987 (1984); see also Tucker v. Carlson, 925 F.2d 330, 333 n. 4 (9th Cir.1991); Brown v. Rison, 895 F.2d 533, 535 n. 1 (9th Cir.1990). Moya committed the failure to appear offense in November 1988. Accordingly, section 3568 is not applicable. 15 AFFIRMED.