Opinion ID: 2973620
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Other Allegedly False Statements

Text: In its reply brief, Terminal points to other statements in CSX’s Notice of Exemption that it believes contained false or misleading information. But we have “consistently held that we will not consider . . . arguments” raised for the first time on reply. Am. Trim, L.L.C. v. Oracle Corp., 383 F.3d 462, 477 (6th Cir. 2004). Absent a showing that any of CSX’s statements were false or misleading, the STB did not -5- No. 05-3788 Terminal Warehouse v. CSX Transportation abuse its discretion or act arbitrarily and capriciously in denying Terminal’s petition for revocation of CSX’s abandonment exemption.