Opinion ID: 2975799
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Retention of Earl Deever

Text: Finally, Frazier contends that he was treated differently from Earl Deever, a non-minority casual employee whom USF Holland allegedly retained after ceasing to call Frazier. Frazier’s evidence that Deever was similarly situated to him consists exclusively of Frazier’s own deposition testimony identifying Deever only as a white casual employee. Frazier has failed to establish that Deever was similarly situated to Frazier in all relevant respects: Fraizer does not indicate how long Deever had been employed as a casual employee, Deever’s level of performance while employed at USF Holland, or Deever’s relevant past experience. We conclude, therefore, that Fraizer has not established a genuine issue of material fact based on the retainment of Earl Deever. In sum, Frazier’s generalized and vague allegations that other non-minority casual employees were treated better than he was is not enough to make out a prima facie showing that he was denied further employment because of his race. We therefore affirm the entry of summary judgement on his race discrimination claims.