Opinion ID: 2608707
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Other contentions by petitioners.

Text: Petitioners also make some other contentions in their brief in the Court of Appeals and in their petition for review to this court, including the following: (1) That the notice of an earlier hearing by the City of Gold Hill on the proposed sewage treatment plant was inadequate. (2) That the permit to build the plant on an undersized parcel violated the county zoning ordinance. (3) That the site for the proposed plant was selected without consideration of other available property. We have not overlooked these and other contentions by the petitioners, but conclude that they are not well taken and that the Court of Appeals reached the correct result in its disposition of these three contentions, although we do not necessarily agree with all of its reasoning in doing so. Finding no error, we affirm the order by the Jackson County Board of Commissioners and the decision by the Court of Appeals affirming that order. Affirmed.