Opinion ID: 1146147
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: ¶ 9. This Court agrees with the conclusion of both the circuit court and the Court of Appeals that Adams's claims are subject to arbitration pursuant to the terms of the contract he signed. The arbitration agreement stated: [a]ny controversy or claim between or among you or me or our assignees arising out of or relating to this Contract or any agreements or instruments relating to or delivered in connection with this Contract, including any claim based on or arising from an alleged tort, shall, if requested by either you or me, be determined by arbitration, reference, or trial by judge as provided below. See Doleac v. Real Estate Professionals, LLC, 911 So.2d 496, 504 (Miss.2005) (applying arbitration clause to tort claims arising under agreements). ¶ 10. Therefore, we are left with the issue: I. Was the trial court correct in ordering Brown to arbitration or was the Court of Appeals correct in finding that Brown, as a non-signatory to the contract, had a right to have her claims adjudicated in a court of law?