Opinion ID: 2455395
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: ¶ 5 1. Did the Board improperly disregard evidence or elevate some GMA goals over others? ¶ 6 2. Did the Board properly determine that the County failed to develop a written record explaining the rural element of its Plan? ¶ 7 3. Did the Board improperly employ a bright line rule regarding rural densities? ¶ 8 4. Did the Board properly find that the County failed to protect rural character? ¶ 9 5. Did the Board properly conclude that the County failed to provide for a variety of rural densities? ¶ 10 6. Did the Board properly find that the County's development regulations allow for urban densities and uses in its designated agricultural land? ¶ 11 7. Did the Board properly determine that the County's land use decisions around its airports violate the GMA? ¶ 12 8. Did the Board properly determine that the County failed to protect water by not requiring disclosure of common ownership in subdivision applications?