Opinion ID: 2268995
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Sam's Second Motion To Compel

Text: While his first motion to compel was pending, Sam filed a second motion to compel. It asserted that: he had been awarded $60,000 of the Azalea personal property; he did not receive his personal property as was awarded to him; most of the items were personal to his family and had been owned by him before the marriage; and the remaining items were attached to his military career. This motion again listed the 28-some items. His supporting affidavit asserted that he had received Azalea items whose value was much less than his $60,000 award, and that he was seeking return of items including pre-marital, inherited and other items. Kathleen argued in opposition that, as to the Azalea items, the second motion to compel was identical to the first and thus redundant, and should be summarily denied. Her unsworn opposition also inferentially denied that she possessed any of Sam's personal property. On July 30, 2008, the same day it denied Sam's first motion to compel, the court denied his second motion to compel as redundant.