Opinion ID: 1351145
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 33

Heading: Failure to remove a juror

Text: (80) During the penalty phase Juror Youngman attempted to give some religious material to defendant. Thereafter she was questioned in chambers in the presence of both counsel. She explained she had become concerned with defendant's soul, and believed it was her duty as a Christian to give him the word of God so that, you know, he has it. I mean it can be a comfort to him. She conceded that she had discussed this point with her husband, and on further questioning stated her religious feelings would not affect her ability to follow the instructions and fairly decide the sentence. The prosecutor asked to excuse Youngman, and defendant's counsel strenuously objected. Defendant now asserts the court erred by ruling in his favor and allowing Youngman to remain. The issue is waived by counsel's action, which was itself plainly based on his tactical assessment, reasonable under the circumstances, that Youngman would be sympathetic to his case. We perceive neither error nor ineffective counsel.