Opinion ID: 1922414
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Superior Court Holding and Scope of Our Review

Text: The Superior Court concluded that all the allegations against Eon in the fenphen suits come within the scope of the arising out of language, including claims related to the use of Eon's phentermine, the warranty claims, and claims of fraud, conspiracy, negligent misrepresentation and concerted action. [13] The basis for this holding is that all claims are related to the fact that Eon manufactured and distributed phentermine. [14] Finally, the Court held: There being no claim that is not wholly within the scope of the exclusion, Reliance has no duty to defend. [15] It is this conclusion of law interpreting an insurance contract and granting summary judgment that we now proceed to review de novo on this appeal. [16]