Opinion ID: 2791904
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Unemployment Insurance Costs

Text: Herrera contests the inclusion of $4,130.40 restitution for unemployment benefits she received after her termination. Herrera asserts a variety of arguments on this point, but wholly fails to provide any legal analysis and cites no authority in support of her allegations. She merely asserts that inclusion was improper for “many of the same reasons already discussed,” yet she provides no explanation of which reasons she refers to or how they apply to this particular claim. Thus, Herrera has abandoned her challenge to the award for the unemployment benefit expenses by inadequately 8 Case: 14-10513 Document: 00512995779 Page: 9 Date Filed: 04/07/2015 No. 14-10513 briefing the issue. See United States v. Ballard, 779 F.2d 287, 295 (5th Cir. 1986) (finding that a party who “offer[s] only a bare listing of alleged [errors], without citing supporting authorities or references to the record” abandons those claims on appeal), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1109 (1986). Accordingly, we AFFIRM the district court’s judgment of restitution. 9