Opinion ID: 1444820
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Reasonableness of Hawes' sentence

Text: Hawes also argues that his sentence was unreasonable because the District Court gave presumptive weight to the guidelines and imposed a sentence greater than necessary to meet the purposes of sentencing. Because we find that the miscalculation of the Guideline range was not harmless error, we cannot review the sentence for reasonableness. See Langford, 516 F.3d at 214-15, 220. We are confident that the District Court will not give presumptive weight to the Guidelines on remand as the Supreme Court has recently made clear that this is error. Gall v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, ___, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).