Opinion ID: 1841190
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: The Henry Judgment

Text: Doug Sellers testified as follows in connection with the claim of Henry Brick: Q. He [Jones] said what, Mr. Sellers? A. Said he needed brick for his house and the number he needed. And he said go ahead and bill it to the Federal Land Bank. Q. Why did he say do that? A. Because we would not bill it to Webb Hargrove. Q. Did he indicate why the Federal Land Bank? A. They were financing the construction of his home. Q. And did you bill it that way? A. I billed it that way. Q. And I show you Defendant Henry Brick Exhibit No. 16 which is an itemized account, Mr. Sellers. Is that the amount of the total account for the brick that went in Mr. Jones's home? A. Right. Q. And that's $1,393.25? A. Right. Therefore, Henry suffered a detriment in the sum of $1,393.25, plus interest accrued, and the Joneses received a benefit by having the brick installed in their house. The Henry judgment against the Joneses is due to be affirmed for the same reasons supporting the Rawls judgment.