Opinion ID: 790206
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: Doe v. Miller

Text: 12 The 58 new Does also filed a separate action, Doe v. Miller, No. 00-166-KSF, in which they moved to intervene in the earlier Guy and Doe I cases pursuant to Rule 60(b)(4) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. They contend that the lack of notice to the putative class members violated their right to the due process of law, making the judgments in those cases void. The Does' claims in Doe v. Miller were rejected by the district court in an order entered on October 7, 2002. 13 Three related appeals have arisen from this procedural morass. Doe v. Miller has been consolidated with Guy v. LFUCG. The third appeal is Doe v. LFUCG.