Opinion ID: 66189
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Objection-Elicitation Requirement

Text: District courts must “elicit fully articulated objections, following imposition of sentence, to the court’s ultimate findings of fact and conclusions of law,” as well as “the manner in which the sentence is pronounced.” Jones, 899 F.2d at 1102. This requirement applies to revocation of supervised release proceedings. United States v. Campbell, 473 F.3d 1345, 1348 (11th Cir. 2007). Here, the parties concede that the court failed to elicit objections as required by Jones. “Where the district court has not elicited fully articulated objections following the imposition of sentence, [we] will vacate the sentence and remand for further sentencing in order to give the parties an opportunity to raise and explain their objections.” Jones, 899 F.2d at 1103. However, remand is unnecessary when the record on appeal is sufficient for meaningful appellate review. Campbell, 476 F.3d at 1347. Upon review of the record, we conclude remand is not necessary because the record is sufficient for appellate review.