Opinion ID: 50347
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: causing his death. The defendants jointly

Text: Jamie was arrested and jailed. Upon Jam- moved to dismiss based on qualified immunity. ie’s arrival, jailer Kyle Buce administered a The district court granted the motion for Mental Disability/Suicide Intake Screening qualified immunity of the John Does and SherForm adopted by the Texas Commission on iff Reeves in their individual capacity with Jail Standards (“TCJS”). Jamie responded regard to the former claim of failure to provide negatively when asked whether he had at- appropriate treatment and denied the motion tempted suicide; had thoughts about killing with regard to the latter claim.2 Whitt appeals himself; was considering killing himself that that order. day; had ever had long periods without sleep; or had had periods of particular excitement. III. Jamie answered affirmatively to only one ques- We review a summary judgment de novo, tion, whether he had “experienced a recent using the same standard applicable in the disloss or death [of] a family member or friend or trict court. Olabisiomotosho v. City of Hous- [whether he was] worried about major ton, 185 F.3d 521, 525 (5th Cir.1999). “After problems other than [his] legal situation.” consulting applicable law to ascertain the material factual issues, we consider the evidence Buce also noted that Jamie appeared to be in a good mood, was not acting in a strange manner, and did not exhibit any signs of de- 1 The TCJS has promulgated extensive pro- pression. Buce concluded that Jamie was not cedures for monitoring inmates who present a risk of suicide. It is undisputed that these procedures were not followed here.