Opinion ID: 1291747
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: The Permanent Injunction Against Using perfumebay.com and perfume-bay.com

Text: Perfumebay failed to establish that the district court abused its discretion. 15 U.S.C. § 1116(a) vests the district court with the power to grant injunctions according to principles of equity and upon such terms as the court may deem reasonable, to prevent the violation of any right of the trademark owner . . . McCord, 452 F.3d at 1137 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). When the infringing use is for a similar service, a broad injunction is especially appropriate. GoTo.com, 202 F.3d at 1211 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). The district court did not clearly err in finding that the conjoined version of perfumebay created a likelihood of confusion. eBay and Perfumebay's services are similar, as they both sell perfume on internet web sites and utilize search engines extensively for attracting customers. A broad injunction addressing such similarities is especially appropriate. See id. eBay also presented evidence that the hyphenated term perfume-bay contributed to consumer confusion, as e-bay is associated with ebay by consumers. [4]