Opinion ID: 1920442
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Summary judgment in favor of Rotenberger and against Bail on indemnity theory.

Text: We vacate, without deciding, the summary judgment on the claim of indemnity because it is rendered moot by our holding on issue two, which permits a direct action by Bail against Rotenberger. See O'Connor v. Plotkins, Inc., 32 Md.App. 329, 362 A.2d 95 (1976) ( overruled on other grounds by Yarema v. Exxon Corp., 305 Md. 219, 503 A.2d 239 (1986)). We reverse and remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion. WUEST, C.J., and MORGAN, J., concur. MILLER, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, concurs in part and dissents in part without writing. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge, sitting for HENDERSON, J., disqualified.