Opinion ID: 1316266
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 8

Heading: He had a terrible record on probation with probation revocations and dirty urine analyses.

Text: 9. He actually had committed two felonies prior to this crime, but since he had not been convicted of the second felony before this crime it could not be considered for presumptive sentencing purposes. 10. He had a significant juvenile record. 11. He had no verifiable employment and a miserable work history. 12. He had received no alcohol or drug treatment. 13. He had a poor record while incarcerated. As a result of the number and quality of the aggravators established by the evidence, as well as the facts of the crimes themselves, Judge Andrews found Hodari's record qualified him as a dangerous offender. Judge Andrews's assessment of his extreme dangerousness is evidenced by the court's remark: this court's sentence will not put Mr. Hodari under correctional supervision for the rest of his life because I can't do it because it's not authorized.