Opinion ID: 1878185
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: sufficiency of the evidence

Text: Klindt argues that the evidence was insufficient to support a charge of second-degree murder. Specifically, he claims that it was insufficient on the element of malice aforethought. See Iowa Code §§ 707.1-.3 (1983). Malice aforethought is defined as that condition of mind which prompts one to do a wrongful act intentionally, without legal justification or excuse. State v. Love, 302 N.W.2d 115, 119 (Iowa 1981) (quoting State v. McCollom, 260 Iowa 977, 988, 151 N.W.2d 519, 525 (1967)). Malice need not exist for any specific period of time; it is sufficient if it existed for any time before the killing. Love, 302 N.W.2d at 119. The use of a deadly weapon, accompanied by an opportunity for deliberation, is evidence of malice. Id. When reviewing a case for sufficiency of the evidence, we construe the record in the light most favorable to the State. State v. Moses, 320 N.W.2d 581, 586 (Iowa 1982). We have already concluded that the scientific and statistical evidence was properly admitted. There was other substantial evidence to support the verdict. The parties were locked in a bitter dissolution dispute. There was also evidence that, after Joyce's disappearance, Klindt had given conflicting statements to investigating officers. Klindt had an ongoing extramarital relationship prior to and following Joyce's disappearance, and the disappearance by Joyce was out of character for her. In addition, a witness testified she had seen Klindt putting plastic bags in his boat, then transporting them out into the river. One of the bags was said to be so heavy that it required him to use both hands to carry it. There was other evidence supporting the verdict, but it is not necessary to detail it here. We merely conclude that the evidence was sufficient. We have considered all of the arguments raised on appeal and conclude that there is no basis for reversal. AFFIRMED.