Opinion ID: 2747926
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: We review de novo the district court's grant of summary judgment. Velázquez-Pérez v. Developers Diversified Realty Corp., 753 F.3d 265, 270 (1st Cir. 2014). As the moving party, Saint Consulting is entitled to summary judgment if it shows that there 3 The plaintiffs' notice of appeal lacks any reference to the district court's orders denying leave to amend their complaint and for reconsideration. Though neither party raises the point, the notice of appeal arguably fails to designate the judgment, order, or part thereof being appealed with respect to these two orders. Fed. R. App. P. 3(c)(1)(B). Nonetheless, this rule is not absolute . . . and we assume arguendo that we have jurisdiction to resolve this claim of error. Nikitine v. Wilmington Trust Co., 715 F.3d 388, 389 n.2 (1st Cir. 2013) (citations omitted). -5- is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and [it] is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a).