Opinion ID: 3163612
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Jail Time Credit

Text: For his fifth claim, Wood asserts that the circuit court erred in denying Wood’s Rule 37.1 petition because he did not receive 1,100 days’ jail-time credit that he alleges he is entitled to based on the order. The circuit court denied this claim and held that “it is clear from review of the transcript that the credit of one hundred (100) days is correct.” Again, Wood’s claim is not a cognizable claim related to whether his plea was entered intelligently and voluntarily upon advice of competent counsel. See Polivka, 2010 Ark. 152, 362 S.W.3d 918; Camacho, 2011 Ark. 235. Further, the record does not support Wood’s argument. Wood must assert that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s errors, he would not have pleaded guilty and would have insisted on going to trial. Buchheit, 339 Ark. at 483, 6 S.W.3d at 111. Wood has failed to meet this standard, and we affirm the circuit court.