Opinion ID: 2162037
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: companion litigation

Text: Appellant has expansively availed himself of both legal and administrative avenues in efforts to redress his grievances. He has been a frequent litigant at both the F.C.C. and in federal court. [5] He has brought suits and claims in apparent preparation for his pending F.C.C. case, in California, Pennsylvania, at the F.C.C. directly, in federal District Court for the District of Columbia, and in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia. He has matters pending appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and now here in this court. So far, he has been singularly and uniformly unsuccessful in breaching the wall of privilege that surrounds the pending F.C.C. investigation into his alleged improper business practices that may ultimately cost him more than 150 profitable licenses.