Opinion ID: 2495846
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: issues

Text: ¶ 17. Leah and Dewey assert the following issues, which we rephrase for clarity: I. Whether the lower court abused its discretion by granting Dewey's joinder motion and in handling Dewey's request for separate representation. II. Whether the lower court erred in refusing proposed jury instructions P-21, P-36, P-40, P-44A, and P-44B and in granting jury instruction numbers 7, 10, and 11. III. Whether the verdict was against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. IV. Whether the lower court erred in failing to grant Leah's and Dewey's Motions for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict. We limit our review to the first two issues. See M.R.A.P. 17.