Opinion ID: 1085024
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Reduction of Award

Text: Finally, in his third assertion of error, Carter claims that the circuit court erred by reducing Carter’s award from $52,416.56 to $42,104.06 without explanation or calculation. Other than citing to the standard of review, Carter makes no argument or citation to authority as to why the court’s action was in error. We have held that we will not consider an issue if the appellant has failed to cite to any convincing legal authority in support of his argument. Johnson v. Encompass Ins. Co., 355 Ark. 1, 130 S.W.3d 553 (2003). We have further held that the failure to develop a point legally or factually is reason enough to affirm the circuit court. Id. Accordingly, because Carter failed to present this court with convincing and developed arguments on this issue, we affirm the circuit court’s decision to reduce the amount of fees and costs. Affirmed. Robert S. Tschiemer, P.A., by: Robert S. Tschiemer; and James H. Carter, Jr., for appellant. Rose Law Firm, a Professional Association, by: Kathryn Bennett Perkins and Haley Heath Burks, for appellees. 11