Opinion ID: 1163208
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: counts iiivi

Text: As to Counts III, IV, V, and VI, the complainant withdrew and dismissed all allegations as to any violations of Rule 5.2, Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct. The parties stipulated and agreed to the following: (A) The letters sent by regular mail by complainant to respondent were not returned to the complainant. Respondent did not receive these letters until he discovered them at an address where he had previously officed after he was served with a subpoena for his deposition. (B) The letters sent by certified mail by the complainant to the respondent were returned to complainant with notations thereon indicating that the respondent had moved from the address indicated and that he had left no forwarding address. (C) On April 8, 1995, Respondent was served with a subpoena to take his deposition. His deposition was taken on May 9, 1995. (D) From January 1994 through on or about January of 1996, the respondent changed his office location four times. Only upon his most recent move did the respondent notify the Bar Association of his new address. The Bar and the respondent agreed that his failure to notify Miller of his address changes violated Rules 1.3, 1.4, and 3.2, Oklahoma Rules of Professional Conduct. We agree.