Opinion ID: 1165292
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Schenk v. MVD

Text: Arrested for DUII and taken to the Clackamas County Jail, Schenk was offered a breath test. In response, Schenk stated that he wanted to talk to an attorney but did not expressly refuse to take the test. According to the officer, He kept saying that he wanted to call his attorney first. I advised him that under the circumstances if he didn't take the test, that it would be considered a refusal. He said he wasn't refusing but he wanted to talk to an attorney. He said an attorney. He didn't say which one. I asked  or advised him that that wasn't possible and read him the consequences and rights of a driver under the implied consent law, advised him that any request for delay would constitute a refusal. He still wouldn't take the test.    The order as to Schenk must be vacated for the same reason as in the Moore case.