Opinion ID: 1671113
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: Whether the chancellor erred by refusing to consider the testimony of Sharon's therapist concerning Sharon's mental health in his analysis of the factor of the mental health of the parents?

Text: ¶ 48. In his analysis of the Albright factor of physical and mental health of the parents, the chancellor observed that the mental and emotional problems suffered by the Defendant [Sharon] give this court great concern with respect to her ability to care for the children. Sharon alleges that the chancellor committed error by stating concern over Sharon's mental and emotional problems when evaluating the Albright factors. Essentially, she makes the exact same argument as seen in issue II herein above. Therefore, as this issue has already been discussed and dismissed, it is unnecessary to repeat the discussion. In short, the chancellor had plenty of evidence in the record on which to base his concern over the children's best interest. Sharon admitted a history of mental problems, Joey reaffirmed such problems, and Donna Olds and Brandy Schroyer testified to knowing of Sharon's psychological difficulties.