Opinion ID: 38092
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Alfaro's Criminal History Category

Text: 17 With respect to Alfaro's argument that the district court erred in assigning a criminal history point under U.S.S.G. § 4Al.2(c)(1) for his Texas state misdemeanor conviction for evading arrest, we note that both Alfaro and the government agree that the district court erred. As the Government admits, under § 4A1.2(c)(1), a criminal history point should have been assigned to Alfaro's prior conviction for evading arrest only if the conviction resulted in a sentence of probation for a year or more or imprisonment for thirty days or more. See U.S.S.G. § 4A1.2(c)(1); United States v. Moore, 997 F.2d 30, 33 (5th Cir. 1993). lufaro only received a sentence of ten days imprisonment for his evading arrest conviction. Thus, the district court erred in assigning a criminal history point for this offense. Because we vacate Alfaro's sentence based on the sixteen-level enhancement, however, we need not address whether the court's erroneous imposition of the criminal history point is plain error requiring reversal. 18