Opinion ID: 465256
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: 10 I. Is the district court's order a final judgment pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291, over which this court has appellate jurisdiction? 11 II. Was the district court correct in confirming the Panel's compensatory award, based as it was on a finding that Merrill Lynch's misrepresentation was a material fact upon which French could reasonably rely? 12 III. Was the district court correct in holding that the Panel did not exceed its powers by awarding French interest on his damage award at the broker call-rate, to accrue from August 1, 1982 through the first day of the month in which the damages are paid? 13 IV. Was the district court correct in vacating the award of consequential damages on the ground that it was beyond the scope of the matters the parties agreed to submit to arbitration? 14 V. Should French be awarded attorney's fees incurred in responding to Merrill Lynch's cross-appeal because that appeal is frivolous?