Opinion ID: 215200
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Validsa’s May 9 and May 22 Letters

Text: On May 9, counsel for Validsa sent Kabboul a letter requesting adequate assurances of performance within five days. PSI responded with a letter dated May 16, 2008, which stated in relevant part: [We] have [informed] your company several times that [] Validsa was not intended to be the recipient of [] [the internal communications contained in Ms. Rivas’s e-mail of April 15], so they should not have [been] taken into consideration. For that reason, we find it very hard to understand how your company even takes the issue to a legal pre-claim communication. On May 22, Validsa sent another letter to PSI regretting PSI’s lack of a concrete response to Validsa’s complaint and asking that PSI “normalize the late payments” on the contracts. PSI did not directly respond to this letter, but instead sent a new draft agreement to Validsa on June 3.