Opinion ID: 1979670
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Credit for Hutton's rental of a portion

Text: The trial court found that Janz did not use the Poison Lake pasture in 1983 because it had been overgrazed in 1982. The court found that Hutton, without Janz's consent, had rented the pasture to others in 1984 and 1985. In computing the amount of rent due Hutton, the trial court gave Janz credit for two-thirds of the amount of rent Hutton received for the Poison Lake pasture in 1984 but did not do so for the 1985 rent. Janz has asserted that [i]t was clearly erroneous for the trial court to have (implicitly) found that in one case the credit was due Janz and not in the other. That issue has been mooted by our determination that Hutton was entitled to evict Janz because of the subletting to Amsbaugh.