Opinion ID: 3006955
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Sergeant Klevens

Text: Next, we turn to LaFleur’s claims against Sergeant Klevens. LaFleur asserts that because Officer Camp lacked probable cause, Sergeant Klevens also lacked probable cause to rely on Camp’s arrest signal. We have already decided that Officer Camp had probable cause to make the arrest. Officers are allowed to make arrests pursuant to information they “reasonably believe” is made by “an account of criminal activity from a seemingly reliable witnessing officer.” Deville v. Marcantel, 567 F.3d 156, 167 (5th Cir. 2009). In this case, Klevens relied on Camp’s signal that an arrest should be made, and authorized the two officers who made the arrest. Because there is no convincing argument asserted that Sergeant Klevens acted unreasonably, he is entitled to qualified 4 Case: 15-20195 Document: 00513217063 Page: 5 Date Filed: 10/02/2015 No. 15-20195 immunity. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment with respect to all claims against Sergeant Klevens.