Opinion ID: 2801640
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: introduction

Text: In 2011, Patrick Neil London filed a federal civil rights action against Defendants, alleging they violated his fourth amendment right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures. London also raised Oklahoma state tort claims. The district court dismissed the fourth amendment claims pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), concluding London’s complaint failed to allege facts sufficient to state a claim for relief plausible on its face. See Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007). The court also dismissed the state-law claims. London brought this appeal challenging the district court’s dismissal of his complaint. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we affirm the judgment.