Opinion ID: 2639745
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: conclusion

Text: ¶ 40 The language of the settlement agreement between Bodell and Jenson unambiguously demonstrates that Bodell and Jenson intended the agreement to release only the claims they had against one another, not any third-party claims they may have. Accordingly, we reverse the district court's grant of summary judgment. But we affirm the district court's decision to strike the Weight Report. In light of the facts that Bodell failed to timely disclose the damages theories contained in the report, late disclosure of the theories would have prejudiced Bank One and Robbins, and Bodell failed to show good cause for his untimeliness, striking the report was within the discretion granted to the district court by Utah Rule of Civil Procedure 37(f). ¶ 41 Chief Justice DURHAM, Justice PARRISH, Justice NEHRING, and Judge WILLMORE concur in Associate Chief Justice DURRANT's opinion. ¶ 42 Having disqualified himself, Justice WILKINS does not participate herein; District Judge THOMAS L. WILLMORE sat.