Opinion ID: 2498805
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 11

Heading: ABA Standard 9.0 Aggravating and Mitigating Factors

Text: Aggravating circumstances include any considerations or factors that may justify an increase in the degree of discipline to be imposed. [32] Mitigating circumstances include any considerations or factors that may justify a reduction in the severity of the sanction to be imposed. [33] The Court considers evidence regarding the following aggravating circumstances in deciding the appropriate sanction. Because Respondent did not appear at the hearing or otherwise participate in these proceedings, the Court is unaware of any mitigating factors. Prior Disciplinary Offenses  9.22(a): Respondent was suspended for one year and one day, with the condition of reinstatement, effective August 15, 2009, for violations of Colo. RPC 3.3(a)(1), 3.4(c), and 8.4(c). His misconduct included failing to report his interest in property, making misrepresentations, and for falsely testifying in his personal bankruptcy case. Dishonest or Selfish Motive  9.22(b): Respondent acted with a dishonest and selfish motive when he failed to notify his clients and opposing counsel of his suspension and then continued to practice law. Pattern of Misconduct  9.22(c) : Respondent's repeated failure to notify his clients and opposing counsel that his license was suspended and his continued noncompliance with court orders regarding suspension constitutes a pattern of misconduct. Multiple Offenses  9.22(d): By the Court's order of default, Respondent was found to have engaged in multiple acts of misconduct by continuing to practice law while suspended, failing to notify his clients and opposing counsel of his suspension, and making misrepresentations in affidavits he filed with the Colorado Supreme Court regarding the winding up of his practice. Submission of False Evidence, False Statements, or Other Deceptive Practices During the Disciplinary Process  9.22(f): Respondent falsely represented to the Court during the hearing on September 7, 2011, that the Nichols-Centennial address was his current address. There is evidence before the Court that another individual purchased the Nichols-Centennial residence on July 29, 2011, and was the sole resident. Respondent's probation officer also stated that Respondent had provided him with a South Glencoe address on February 14, 2011, and never updated that address.