Opinion ID: 1898610
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: objections to instructions and evidence

Text: Appellants requested fifty-two instructions. They were given ten. The number requested was increased by the fact that in many instances the same instruction was asked for Bentz, for Jackson, and for both jointly. Appellees were given six instructions. Appellants assigned as error the refusal of numerous instructions. We have considered all the instructions and think that taking them all together, the issue involved was fairly and concisely submitted to the jury and that there was no reversible error in refusing those not given to appellants nor in the giving of those for appellee. There are numerous other assignments of error dealing with the admission of evidence and exhibits. Without detailing all these matters, suffice it to say we are unable to say any of said matters constitute reversible error. The case is affirmed on direct appeal.