Opinion ID: 6108354
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Sufficiency of the Evidence to Sustain the Judgment

Text: Mosley's claim that the evidence adduced at his trial was insufficient to prove that he was guilty of rape is not a ground for the writ. Challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence constitute a direct attack on the judgment and are not cognizable in a coram nobis proceeding. Grady v. State , 2017 Ark. 245 , 525 S.W.3d 1 . Allegations that the evidence presented at trial was not sufficient to support a finding of the defendant's guilt are issues to be addressed at trial, and, when appropriate, on the record on direct appeal. Jackson v. State , 2017 Ark. 195 , 520 S.W.3d 242 .