Opinion ID: 3044453
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: We review the denial of a motion for a judgment as a matter of law de novo and apply the same standards as the district court. Ash v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 664 F.3d 883, 892 (11th Cir. 2011). We will reverse the denial of a motion for a judgment as a matter of law “only if the facts and inferences point overwhelmingly in favor of one party, such that reasonable people could not arrive at a contrary verdict.” Id. (internal quotation mark omitted). “We will not second-guess the jury or substitute our judgment for its judgment if its verdict is supported by sufficient evidence.” Lambert v. Fulton Cnty., Ga., 253 F.3d 588, 594 (11th Cir. 2001). “We view all the evidence and draw all inferences from it in the light most favorable to . . . the nonmoving party.” Ash, 664 F.3d at 892.