Opinion ID: 1139929
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: 494 on petitioners' motion

Text: Harlow F. Lenon, Portland, for the motion. Collier, Bernard, Bernard & Edwards, Portland, contra. MOTION ALLOWED. ROSSMAN, J. 24. This cause is before us upon a motion filed by the appellants under the provisions of 28 USCA, § 2101 (f) for an order staying the mandate and staying execution and enforcement of the judgment herein for a reasonable time to enable them to obtain a Writ of Certiorari from the Supreme Court of the United States   . The motion is sustained and the stay is granted. Our action in granting the appellants the  relief which they seek must not be construed as an indication from us that, in our opinion, the case was decided in this court upon a theory which was not at issue in, and which was not presented to, the circuit court. The order which grants this relief will be predicated upon the condition that the appellants apply for the writ promptly, and in no event later than May 15, 1956.