Opinion ID: 1287506
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: order amending opinion and denying rehearing and amended opinion.order

Text: The opinion filed on September 25, 2008, is amended as follows: On slip Opinion page 13750, insert a new footnote 3 at the bottom of the page after the sentence that ends ... applies to Ordinance 1603. (and renumber the subsequent footnotes): We observe that the ordinance before us concerns a permit condition designed to mitigate the adverse effects of the new development. New construction increases the burden on the City's sewer system and increases the loss that might result from flooding. After experiencing considerable flooding, the City enacted Ordinance 1603 to require most new developments to include specified storm pipes. We are not confronted, therefore, with a legislative development condition designed to advance a wholly unrelated interest. We do not address whether Penn Central or Nollan/Dolan would apply to such legislation. With the opinion as amended, Judge Clifton and Judge N.R. Smith voted to deny the petition for rehearing en banc and Judge Seabright so recommended. The full court has been advised of the petition for rehearing en banc and no judge has requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R.App. P. 35. The petition for rehearing en banc, filed October 9, 2008, is DENIED. No further petitions for rehearing or rehearing en banc may be filed by the parties.