Opinion ID: 2621389
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: The trial court's error was preserved

Text: ¶ 33 Audett's objection to the CR 35 exam preserved the trial court's error. The remedy is exclusion of any testimony resulting from the exam. Furthermore, Audett did not need to reraise an already overruled objection simply because Dr. Rawlings testified. Any objection must (1) allow opportunity for the trial court to correct the asserted error, and (2) put all parties on notice of the contended issue. State v. McCorkle, 137 Wash.2d 490, 498, 973 P.2d 461 (1999) (Talmadge, J., concurring). Audett's objection to the CR 35 exam was clear enough to preserve the error.