Opinion ID: 211104
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Contempt Hearing

Text: 34 In the district court's final judgment, it enjoined EEI to cease all manufacturing, offers for sale, and sales of its infringing HIPR slurry drag reducing agent product effective immediately. EEI, however, continued to manufacture its HIPR product and substituted PE wax for the C30 + wax. Conoco moved to find EEI in contempt of the injunction. The court denied the motion because its order was unclear and could be read to allow the use of PE wax. The district court clarified its order and extended the injunction to include EEI's reformulated process using PE wax. 35 EEI filed a timely appeal in this court, and we have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(1).