Opinion ID: 1314471
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: the trial court improperly granted summary judgment in favor of diversified and the claudes on the misrepresentation claim.

Text: Large asserts the trial court improperly relied on the constructive notice provisions of I.C. § 55-811 as the basis for summary judgment on the misrepresentation claim against Diversified and the Claudes. We agree. The trial court granted Diversified and the Claudes summary judgment based on the constructive notice provisions of I.C. § 55-811. This statute provides, in part: Every conveyance of real property acknowledged or proved, and certified, and recorded as prescribed by law, from the time it is filed with the recorder for record, is constructive notice of the contents thereof to subsequent purchasers and mortgag(e)es.