Opinion ID: 4680221
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: resell and recover damages as hereafter pro-

Text: vided (section 554.2706); ( … continued) trict court’s recitation and application of the law, we have no occasion to consider this argument. Nevertheless, we do note that Rexing’s contentions regarding the effects of the district court’s summary judgment ruling were not fully developed until its reply brief, and we caution counsel that such an approach risks waiver. See, e.g., Williams v. Bd. of Educ. of City of Chicago, 982 F.3d 495, 507 n.30 (7th Cir. 2020) (“[A]rguments raised for the first time in a reply brief are waived.”). 53 Both parties agree that Iowa Code § 554.2703 provides the basis for Rembrandt’s damages. See Appellants’ Br. 11. Nos. 20-1726 & 20-1727 25