Opinion ID: 76429
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Hickson's Motion for Summary Judgment

Text: 35 Northern brought a counterclaim against Hickson alleging libel and tortious interference with contractual and business relations. The district court appropriately found that Hickson's July 20, 2000, letter was privileged because it was sent in good faith, in an attempt to support a legitimate business interest, was properly limited in scope, and was sent to the appropriate persons on a proper occasion. Hickson Corp. v. N. Crossarm Co., 235 F.Supp.2d 1352, 1361 (N.D.Ga.2002). Accordingly, the summary judgment for Hickson on this claim is affirmed. 36 AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART; EACH PARTY TO PAY ITS OWN COSTS IN THIS COURT.