Opinion ID: 595885
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: conclusion

Text: 15 We affirm the $2500 sanction imposed on March 27, 1991 for violation of Rule 11. We note that the district court had no power to modify that judgment while appeal was pending. 16 We also affirm the imposition of the second $2500 sanction, imposed on May 30, 1991, for violation of Local Rule 7(f). We vacate that judgment, however, because it purported to modify the first sanction judgment. We remand with instructions to vacate the judgment striking the March 27, 1991 judgment, and to enter a separate judgment for $2500 as a sanction for violation of the local rule. Veeder will bear any costs. 17 AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, AND REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS.