Opinion ID: 1085121
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Disability Retirement Pay

Text: Shelkofsky argues that the Claims Court’s decision that the Air Force erred in placing him on the PDRL was unsupported by substantial evidence. Shelkofsky never made any claim for disability-based retired pay in his complaint before the Claims Court, however. He concedes, moreover, that this “appeal deals with the entitlement of a long serving Reservist to Reserve Retirement and Pay under 10 U.S.C. §§ 12731-12739. The scope of SHELKOFSKY v. US 9 the decision of the Honorable Court below was clearly limited to Reserve Retirement and Pay and excluded Disability Retirement and Pay and Severance Pay.” Appellant Reply Br. 3. Given this record and these concessions, we decline to address these arguments.