Opinion ID: 2633716
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: DP1S's Remaining Arguments on Certiorari

Text: ¶ 9 DP1S continues to urge that McCrady's conduct merits discharge and the OMPC order should be reversed based on its remaining arguments, none of which was addressed either by the district court or COCA. Among these assertions is that the evidence does not support the hearing officer's decision and that she erred (1) by failing to address each of DP1S's requested findings of fact and conclusions of law; (2) in her application of the terms of 74 O.S.2001 § 840-6.3 [25] and OAC 455:10-11-4 [26] (dealing with progressive discipline) and of the terms of OAC 455:10-9-2 [27] (dealing with circumstances an ALJ must consider when reducing previously imposed discipline); and (3) in awarding pre- or postjudgment interest to McCrady.