Opinion ID: 1386703
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: Osborn identified the following as the issues for review: 1. That an affidavit and supporting evidence such as photographs, are sufficient evidence to re-open and charge a defendant for violating a court decision and order. 2. That a prima facie case was made by the appellant to show that the defendant had indeed violated the court order. 3. That the defendant appellee failed to respond to these charges, and therefore is responsible to the appellant for damages. 4. That an affidavit and supporting evidence is sufficient evidence with a motion for disqualification of a judge for cause. 5. That as Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 40.1(b)(2) states: Whenever the grounds for such motion become known. The above quoted statement means ANY TIME and not before an action is filed in court. 6. That a court which refuses to enforce its own decision without a hearing as to the facts, is an ABUSE OF DISCRETION by that court. Manning identified only two issues for review: 1. Whether Appellant presented a prima facie case of violation of the District Court's previous orders in this matter. 2. Whether the District Court should have recused itself when Appellant moved for change of judge.