Opinion ID: 1764507
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: 1. Did the trial court have subject matter jurisdiction over the proceedings? 2. Did the trial court err when it refused Stella Rummel's Requested Jury Instructions Nos. 24, 25, and 26? 3. (a) Did the trial court err when it instructed the jury on fraud? (b) Did the trial court err when it instructed the jury that the plaintiffs were entitled to a stove, refrigerator and dishwasher as well as all built-in appliances, furniture and furnishings in addition to the specifically mentioned appliances? (c) Did the trial court err when it refused to instruct the jury on forced sale? (d) Did the trial court commit error when it instructed on probable cause needed for Neal Hoff to initiate a criminal prosecution? 4. Is the verdict dismissing the counterclaim of the defendant erroneous and contrary to the evidence produced at trial? 5. Is the verdict dismissing the cross-claim of the defendant Rummel erroneous and contrary to the jury finding that the First National Bank and Trust Company breached its contract with the plaintiffs? 6. Is the judgment as entered contrary to the jury verdict to the prejudice of Stella Rummel?