Opinion ID: 2555770
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 23

Heading: Deductions from Appellant's Prison Account

Text: In his final issue, Appellant contends that deductions by the Department of Corrections from his inmate account were unlawful and unconstitutional because the trial court's sentencing order did not include an order directing him to pay the costs of prosecution. Appellant now agrees with the Commonwealth that this issue has been resolved and requires no further judicial consideration. See Spotz v. Commonwealth, 972 A.2d 125 (Pa.Cmwlth.2009); Appellant's Reply Brief at 21. Having reviewed all of Appellant's issues and concluding that none has any merit, we affirm the order of the PCRA court denying Appellant's petition. [53] Justice EAKIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. Chief Justice CASTILLE, Justices BAER, TODD, and ORIE MELVIN join the opinion.