Opinion ID: 3022613
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Substantive Due Process Claim and Equal

Text: Protection Claim In contrast to a Just Compensation Takings Claim, the remedies for a successful substantive due process or equal protection claim as to the face of a zoning ordinance are the invalidation of the regulation and actual damages. The absence of “just compensation” is not part of a due process or equal protection injury. See Williamson, 473 U.S. at 197. Thus, given that the “exhaustion of just compensation procedures” 1 We express no view on the merits of appellants’ Just Compensation Takings claim, as the District Court did not reach the issue and must address it in the first instance upon remand. 12 requirement only exists due to the “special nature of the Just Compensation Clause,” it is inapplicable to appellants’ facial SDP and EPC claims. Because both claims satisfy the finality rule, they are ripe for adjudication. Id. at 195 n.14.