Opinion ID: 1895037
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: The issues that must be addressed by this court are as follows: (1) Did the court of appeals err in reversing the trial court on the question of whether the police honored the defendant's right to counsel and in determining that the defendant initiated conversations with the police during the police interrogation which occurred on June 27, 1984, thereby waiving his right to counsel? (2) Did the appeals court err in affirming the trial court's holding that Turner's right to remain silent was not scrupulously honored on June 27 so as to render his consent to a search of his quarters at the halfway house invalid, thereby justifying the suppression of the evidence seized during that search? (3) Did the appeals court err in holding that the police failed to scrupulously honor Turner's right to remain silent when they reinterrogated him on June 28, the second day that he was in police custody? (4) Finally, did the appeals court err in reversing the trial court's decision that inculpatory statements made by the defendant during the second day of interrogation ought to be suppressed due to involuntariness?