Opinion ID: 1476448
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 10

Heading:  Availability of Compulsory Process

Text: Regarding this factor, the Court found that [a]s a result of Argentina's reservation to the Hague Convention, Pan American may have no pre-trial discovery. Aside from the fact that Pan American never made that argument in the Court of Chancery (and its brief on appeal cites no record evidence to support this claim), Pan American never identified any potential witnesses or documents that are not under its control, or any third party witness in Argentina or elsewhere from whom it would wish to obtain discovery. Nor did Pan American suggest that there exists potential evidence in Argentina or elsewhere that Pan American might want or be unable to obtain in discovery. Consequently, there is no identified record support for the Court of Chancery's finding that Pan American may have no pre-trial discovery.