Opinion ID: 2306140
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: The Uncle's Statements

Text: The government's failure to disclose the statement of the Glovers' uncle that he saw seven individuals assault Wellman [4] did not violate Brady. Both appellants argue that the possible existence of other attackers is somehow exculpatory, but, as noted above, how many people attacked Wellman or who was the principal of that attack is irrelevant to the appellants' culpability under a theory of aiding and abetting. Moreover, appellants make no showing of how the information could have been used for impeachment purposes. Adrianne's testimony clearly indicates that additional people were present at the time of the attack. Accordingly, the uncle's statements do not create a reasonable doubt about the appellants' guilt when evaluated in the context of the entire record.