Opinion ID: 746910
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Weeks' Probation Period and Its Extension

Text: 69 In a one-page argument on appeal, Weeks takes issue with the district court's ruling regarding his complaints about SHI's extension of his probation period. The district court stated: 70 In section VII(c), Mr. Weeks asserts that defendants misrepresented to him that they were extending his probation period to provide him with travel benefits. Mr. Weeks provides no evidence, however, that defendants actually extended his probation period because, as he contends, they were upset with him in connection with the Rental Pool Program. 71 Weeks, 933 F.Supp. at 715. There is indeed testimony in this case by K.J. Cho, a high-ranking manager with Samsung in Korea, that he was concerned about Weeks' conduct in connection with this Rental Pool Program. However, Weeks has presented no evidence to show any connection between his conduct in regard to the Rental Pool Program and the extension of his probation period. More significantly, he has failed to allege how the extension of his probation period had any effect on him, or how any factual dispute over why his probation period was extended (if there was such a dispute) would be material in terms of affecting the outcome of this case. Absent any showing in this regard, Weeks is unable to establish a genuine issue of material fact as to any alleged misrepresentation about his probation period.