Opinion ID: 1242354
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 8

Heading: The Superior Court Must Reexamine the Overall Property Division.

Text: The superior court divided the marital property unevenly. It allocated approximately $825,919 in marital property to Robin and approximately $710,254 in marital property to Jim. Jim asserts that the overall marital property division is inequitable. In particular, he contends that the real value of the marital property awarded to him is $342,254 because the superior court should have included the full $368,000 value of the ACM debt (discussed in Part IV.B, supra ). He also argues that the superior court should have accounted for the DTC and Fidelity promissory notes (discussed in Part IV.A, supra ). Certainly, an uneven property division would be appropriate in this case. [19] However, in light of our conclusions in Parts IV.A-G, supra, the superior court should reexamine the division of the marital property to ensure that the revised property division will be equitable.