Opinion ID: 61308
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Osler Jean-Jacques

Text: We also find no reversible error in regard to the sentence imposed on JeanJacques, and accordingly affirm his sentence. The standard of review of a district court’s factual determinations to grant 6 safety-valve relief is clear error. United States v. Cruz, 106 F.3d 1553, 1557 (11th Cir. 1997). Section 5C1.2(a) “requires a defendant to both truthfully and fully disclose information within [his] knowledge relating to the crime for which [he] is being sentenced,” in exchange for being sentenced without regard to a statutory minimum sentence. United States v. Figueroa, 199 F.3d 1281, 1283 (11th Cir. 2000). During his guilty plea, Jean-Jacques stipulated to the government’s factual account. At Frank’s and Seraphin’s trial, Jean-Jacques testified to an alternative set of facts. At his own sentencing hearing, he then testified to a third set of facts. Accordingly, the district court did not clearly err by denying Jean-Jacques safetyvalve relief because the record supports the court’s finding that he had not supplied truthful and complete information to the government. AFFIRMED. 7