Opinion ID: 3051292
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: Questions of law, and in particular due process challenges to removal orders, are reviewed de novo. Colmenar v. INS, 210 F.3d 967, 971 (9th Cir. 2000). We give deference under Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, HONG v. MUKASEY 2021 Inc., 467 U.S. 837 (1984), to the agency’s interpretation of the INA. Parilla v. Gonzales, 414 F.3d 1038, 1041 (9th Cir. 2005). We must give “controlling weight” to the Board’s interpretation of immigration regulations “unless [the interpretation] is plainly erroneous or inconsistent with the regulation.” Providence Health System-Washington v. Thompson, 353 F.3d 661, 665 (9th Cir. 2003).