Opinion ID: 1901671
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: The Other Grievants

Text: The argument made by the other five grievantsDryden, Lunkin, Said, Hunt, and Cartyis that they were performing the same duties as Myers and were supervising employees who, though placed in the Agency Buyer series, properly should have been reclassified to the APS series. The problem was that those employees had not sought reclassification and therefore remained in the Agency Buyer positions. As a result, Dryden, Lunkin, Said, Hunt, and Carty did not supervise any APS employees and, for that reason, were not entitled to be in an APS Supervisor position. We agree with the Court of Special Appeals that the ALJ committed no error in that conclusion or in denying the five grievances. JUDGMENT OF COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS AFFIRMED, WITH COSTS.