Opinion ID: 794876
Heading Depth: 5
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Evidence of past torture inflicted upon the applicant;

Text: 25 (ii) Evidence that the applicant could relocate to a part of the country of removal where he or she is not likely to be tortured; 26 (iii) Evidence of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights within the country of removal, where applicable; and 27 (iv) Other relevant information regarding conditions in the country of removal. 28 Id. § 208.16(c)(3). 29 The past acts of violence Almuhtaseb endured in the West Bank do not descend to the level of an extreme form of cruel and inhuman treatment, id. § 1208.18(a)(2), and therefore do not constitute past torture. Although Almuhtaseb has submitted statements contending that the Israelis have detained and tortured Palestinians, such statements, even if taken at face value, do not show that it is more likely than not that Almuhtaseb herself would be subject to such treatment, and she therefore cannot succeed on her claim for withholding of removal under the CAT.