Opinion ID: 735462
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: 14 1. Whether the district court abused its discretion by denying Logal's motions for severance from Kuczek. 15 2. Whether Dahod's allegations of prosecutorial misconduct warrant reversal of his and Logal's convictions. 16 3. Whether the district court abused its discretion by admitting challenged evidence. 17 4. Whether the district court abused its discretion by declining to give requested jury instructions. 18 5. Whether the district court abused its discretion in framing its response to a jury question. 19 6. Whether the district court properly sentenced Dahod and Logal. 20 7. Whether the restitution component of Kuczek's sentence survives his death. 21 8. Whether this court should dismiss Kuczek's appeal as moot, vacate his conviction and sentence, and remand this matter to the district court to dismiss the indictment.