Opinion ID: 363634
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Alleged Interrogation After Invocation Of Right To Silence

Text: 17 In addition, we reject the argument that Klein was illegally questioned subsequent to his invocation of his right to remain silent. Instead, we conclude that Klein waived his right to remain silent. 18 Klein himself admitted that he was twice advised of his rights, and he also testified that he understood those rights. Nonetheless, Klein did not refuse to answer questions. Nor did he seek an attorney or ask the agents to stop questioning him. 10 Moreover, Klein cannot contend that his compliance was induced by fear or compulsion, for, according to his own testimony, he was calm and relaxed during the questioning. 1st Supp.R. at 150. Under these circumstances, we find that there was no illegal interrogation.