Opinion ID: 3195832
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: other bone, muscle, and tissue implants

Text: DOR next argues the ALC erred in finding that the other bone, muscle, and tissue implants replace a missing part of the body because the Hospital did not present evidence to support this finding. We agree. The record is devoid of any evidence to support the ALC's finding that other bone, muscle, and tissue implants replaced missing parts of the body. No evidence provides any details regarding the bone, muscle, and tissue implants that were being ruled on by the ALC; therefore the record plainly does not contain the level of substantial evidence necessary to uphold the finding. 5 The provision indicates that practitioners are individuals such as physicians, dentists, and veterinarians, licensed by law to use or order the use of such device. 21 C.F.R. § 801.109(a)(1)(ii).