Opinion ID: 1153162
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: conclusion

Text: While this Court holds that an equitable distribution should be made in the instant case, an equitable distribution cannot be made by this Court on appeal, but must be remanded for a hearing on this matter. The appraisals of value on the disputed items are either out of date or are untrustworthy. The appraisal on the Market Street property was made in 1983 and the appraisal on the Martin Street property was made in 1988. Also, the values placed on the Corvettes seems very unreliable. Therefore, as a result of the chancellor's emphasis on Jean's adulterous activities, the new guidelines set forth in Ferguson v. Ferguson , and the seemingly inequitable results reached in the instant case, this Court holds that the chancellor was manifestly wrong in not making some type of equitable distribution. This case is reversed and remanded to the chancellor for re-evaluation in light of Chamblee v. Chamblee and Ferguson v. Ferguson . REVERSED AND REMANDED. SULLIVAN, PITTMAN, BANKS, JAMES L. ROBERTS, Jr. and SMITH, JJ., concur. McRAE, J., dissents with separate written opinion joined by HAWKINS, C.J., and DAN M. LEE, P.J.