Opinion ID: 2737139
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 10

Heading: conclusion

Text: We REVERSE the district court’s judgment with regard to Appvion’s ability to bring suit under CERCLA § 107(a). We VACATE the decision to hold NCR responsible for all of the response costs at operable units 2 through 5 in contribution. We AFFIRM the following decisions: that NCR may proceed only under CERCLA § 113(f); that NCR is not liable as an arranger; that Glatfelter’s insurance settlement may not be offset against NCR’s contribution share; that NCR can be required to contribute for natural resource damages; that Glatfelter’s counterclaim based on the discharges at Portage Nos. 13-2447 et al. 57 should be dismissed; and that the defendants’ state-law counterclaims are preempted. This case is REMANDED for proceedings consistent with this opinion.