Opinion ID: 2301355
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 9

Heading: Insufficient Evidence of Guilt

Text: Finally, Spratt argues that the evidence that the state presented at trial was insufficient to convict him. The hearing justice repeatedly made reference to the overwhelming evidence of [Spratt's] guilt and, in particular, to the three separate witnesses to the crime that evening that sufficiently identified Spratt as the perpetratorMr. Perrin, Mr. Warren, and Mr. Tortolani. The applicant has failed to present any indication that the [hearing] justice overlooked or misconceived material evidence sufficient to justify us disturbing his decision. Chapdelaine, 32 A.3d at 941 (quoting Gordon, 18 A.3d at 473). Accordingly, we find no error in the hearing justice's analysis, and resultant dismissal, of this particular claim.