Opinion ID: 854782
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: standard of review

Text: We review de novo a district court’s decision to grant summary judgment. Huckaby v. Priest, 636 F.3d 211, 216 (6th Cir. 2011). Summary judgment is appropriate where “the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(a). A motion for No. 12-3486 Rudisill et al. v. Ford Motor Co. Page 6 summary judgment should not be granted “if the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the nonmoving party.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986). The inquiry is “whether the evidence presents a sufficient disagreement to require submission to a jury or whether it is so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law.” Id. at 251-52.