Opinion ID: 2191641
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 15

Heading: and 28 Malcomb as a credible witness

Text: In his twenty-second exception Kerpelman took issue with [Judge] Levin's `finding' that Malcomb was both a `credible' and `truthful' witness, when Malcomb admitted on the stand under oath that he lies `when it is to his advantage'. In his twenty-eighth exception Kerpelman said: It is explicitly stated in the Record that Malcomb, by admission, Lies when it is to his advantage; the testimony of such a witness cannot, as a matter of law, amount to clear and convincing evidence in disciplinary charges against an attorney. It was for Judge Levin to weigh all of the evidence. He saw and heard this witness. We have no reason to believe that he failed to weigh this statement of Malcomb in his determination of credibility. We perceive no error.