Opinion ID: 1184357
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: additional payments to ficke under a decree of specific performance.

Text: The appellant's third principal point is that, if the decree of specific performance is upheld, he should be awarded the benefits of the accords. This is proper, he argues, because the effect of the decree is to give the appellees the benefit of the accords. We have taken this to mean that the accords were bargains for extensions of the appellees' time for performance and that their failure to perform and successful suit to enforce the agreement in effect gave them additional time, that is, the benefit of the accords. This contention is without merit. It is met by reiterating that both parties waived any claim under the accords; it was the June agreement which was enforced by the superior court. [18] The judgment of the superior court is affirmed. CONNOR, FITZGERALD and BOOCHEVER, JJ., not participating.