Opinion ID: 2976544
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: Edwina Koehn-Koldenhof

Text: In contrast to the above defendants, plaintiff has failed to allege sufficient facts to support No. 06-2263 Lanman v. Hinson, et al. Page 10 a finding that the actions of defendant Edwina Koehn-Koldenhof, R.N., violated Lanman’s constitutional rights. Koehn-Koldenhof’s only physical contact with Lanman consisted of administering an injection of Ativan to calm him down. Plaintiff has not alleged that the injection violated Lanman’s constitutional rights nor has plaintiff alleged that Koehn-Koldenhof supervised the staff during the restraint procedure. Without more, Koehn-Koldenhof’s presence at the scene and administration of Ativan are insufficient to support a finding that she violated Lanman’s constitutional rights. Therefore, summary judgment should be granted in her favor.