Opinion ID: 721951
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: (Davis): It is a one hour drive.

Text: 14 Q. How many miles? 15 A. 55 miles, 60. 16 Q. So it was convenient for you to have a storage garage at your father-in-law's in Kalamazoo despite the fact that you had rented a place on Old 27 and another building on Pearl Street right around the corner from your house? 17 A. I didn't say that I rented one around the corner from my house. 18 Q. You lived on Pearl Street at that time? 19 A. No. 20 Q. Well, how far was it from your house? 21 A. This building was rented while I lived at the lake. 22 Q. How far was that from your house? 23 A. Five miles. 24 The Court: Ms. Landman, he still hadn't answered your question. 25 Ms. Landman: The question of how far is Kalamazoo and Coldwater, miles-wise? 26 The Court: No, he answered that. The question that you asked him was why was it, or something to the effect of why was it more convenient. 27 Ms. Landman: That is true. 28 The Court: He never answered that. Instead of that, he quarreled with you about how close Pearl Street was. 29 Davis: I don't think it was more convenient. I just said it was convenient because we were in town, we were in Kalamazoo once a week visiting her parents. 30 Despite the lack of objection at trial, Davis claims that the highlighted statement unfairly characterized his testimony, was incorrect, was derogatory towards Davis, and invaded the province of the jury in determining the credibility of the witness.