Opinion ID: 2115533
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: As previously indicated the facts in this case are much like those presented by In re Will of Miller, supra.

Text: Trial court therefore understandably deemed Miller persuasive, if not controlling, at the same time observing the injustice of its application. For reasons heretofore stated we agree with that observation and In re Will of Miller, 128 Iowa 612, 105 N.W. 105, is accordingly overruled insofar as inconsistent with this opinion. X. This action was proper and not unnecessarily commenced by plaintiff Kenneth W. Newbury, as executor of the Estate of Kate E. Fults, deceased, to secure construction of the subject will. Costs attendant upon this appeal are therefore taxed to said estate. See Court Rule 23. Reversed. STUART, MASON, BECKER and UHLENHOPP, JJ., concur. LeGRAND, J., MOORE, C. J., and LARSON and REES, JJ., dissent.