Opinion ID: 2377915
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Gillmor Filed Her Petition for Review Within Thirty Days of the County's Final Decisions

Text: ¶ 24 It is undisputed that Gillmor complied with the timeliness requirement set forth in section 801(2)(a). To receive district court review under section 801(2)(a), a party must file a petition for review within thirty days of the date on which a county renders its final land use decision. [15] It is undisputed that Gillmor filed her Petition for Review within thirty days of the date the County rendered its final decisions to deny her applications. Indeed, in its brief, the County agrees that [t]o the extent Gillmor's complaints could be considered bonafide petitions for review ... [they] were timely filed. Based on this concession, we conclude that Gillmor's petition satisfied section 801(2)(a)'s thirty-day timing requirement. ¶ 25 Because Gillmor's Petition for Review satisfies the three requirements set forth in section 801(2)(a), we hold that her claims are not time barred and are entitled to judicial review.