Opinion ID: 25900
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: intercargo’s counterclaim for indemnity

Text: The indemnitors appeal the trial judge’s finding that Intercargo established the necessary elements of an indemnity claim. There being no dispute that the indemnitors signed the agreement, 19 First Valley Bank, 55 S.W.3d at 183. 20 Sassen v. Tanglegrove Townhouse Condo. Ass’n, 877 S.W.2d 489, 492 (Tex. App.–Texarkana 1994). 21 Henry, 128 F. at 250. 9 that a contractual indemnity agreement existed between Intercargo and the indemnitors, that the agreement obligated the indemnitors to indemnify Intercargo in the event claims were made on the bond, and that WRS made a claim on the bond, we affirm.