Opinion ID: 1250238
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: Stated as issues by appellant are: I. Whether the order terminating appellant's parental rights is void because the case was filed by Marianne Lee, Director of DPASS, and not by an attorney authorized to practice law in this state. II. Whether the court erred in granting summary judgment. III. Whether the district court's order should be reversed because the district court did not make specific findings as to the grounds for termination of appellant's parental rights. We add the dispositive problem addressed in In Interest of DG of the lack of jurisdiction because of the failure to secure proper service of process. Gookin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Ins. Co., 826 P.2d 229 (Wyo. 1992); Interest of DG, 825 P.2d 369 (Wyo. 1992).