Opinion ID: 1196280
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues on direct appeal

Text: 1. Did the trial court commit prejudicial error by allowing evidence of Hairston's participation in an uncharged shooting in Colorado two days before the Fuhriman murders? 2. Did the trial court allow the state to go beyond the scope of direct examination when cross-examining Hairston? 3. Did the trial court err by allowing the jury to hear a belatedly disclosed taped conversation between Hairston and a defense witness who visited him in jail during the trial? 4. Did the trial court abuse its discretion by refusing to continue the trial? 5. Did the trial court deny Hairston a fair and impartial jury by refusing to excuse jurors for cause? 6. Does the accumulation of prosecutorial misconduct require a new trial? 7. Should this Court vacate the death sentence imposed, pursuant to Idaho Code § 19-2827? 8. Are two of the aggravating circumstances found by the trial court impermissible, requiring a resentencing?