Opinion ID: 2332710
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: The October 30, 2006 summary judgment ruling

Text: Infinity filed a third motion for summary judgment on February 15, 2006. In this motion, Infinity again sought a ruling that Kalenka's policy did not provide coverage. Infinity emphasized the testimony before the grand jury that indicted Morrell. Infinity argued that this testimony established that the stabbing had been intentional. Infinity also reiterated the arguments from its first motion for summary judgment, arguing again that (1) Kalenka was not occupying his vehicle at the time of his injuries and that (2) the incident did not constitute an accident within the meaning of the policy. The Kalenka Estate opposed and filed a cross-motion for summary judgment on August 15, 2006. The superior court held that since Kalenka was leaning against the vehicle when the fight began, he was occupying the vehicle. But the superior court otherwise denied the motion and cross-motion for summary judgment. On February 27, 2006, the Kalenka Estate filed a wrongful death suit against Morrell, William Wassili, Chilkoot Charlie's, and the Municipality of Anchorage.