Opinion ID: 151062
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Motions to Submit New Evidence

Text: Tehan seeks to introduce nearly fifty exhibits that were not considered below. We have held that, where a party seeks to introduce evidence on appeal that was not submitted to the 4 district court, and is thus not part of the record on appeal, he or she must satisfy the requirements of Fed. R. App. P. 10(e)(2) by demonstrating that such evidence was erroneously or accidentally omitted from the record. See Leibowitz v. Cornell University, 445 F.3d 586, 592 n.4 (2d Cir. 2006) (declining to supplement the record with new evidence where appellant did not show that it was mistakenly omitted from the record on appeal). Tehan cannot satisfy this standard. There is no indication that she ever attempted to submit her new exhibits to the district court or that they were submitted but then mistakenly omitted from the record on appeal. Her motions are therefore denied. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED, and Tehan’s pending motions are DENIED. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk 5