Opinion ID: 200593
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: The Joint Motion

Text: 15 The joint motion suffers from the same problem. Brady claims are subject to the same prejudice requirement as ineffective-assistance claims. See Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694, 104 S.Ct. 2052 (The defendant must show that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.); McCambridge v. Hall, 303 F.3d 24, 37 (1st Cir.2002) (en banc) ([T]here is no prejudice under Brady ... unless there is `a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different.' (quoting United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667, 682, 105 S.Ct. 3375, 87 L.Ed.2d 481 (1985) (plurality opinion))). 16 The judgment is affirmed.