Opinion ID: 2382247
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Damage to Credit Reputation

Text: We note that Jury Question Fifteen regarding injury to credit reputation was premised on the damages incurred by Solis due to Green's delay on the Dayton project. It reads: What sum of money, if any, if paid now in cash, would fairly and reasonably compensate Solis for his damages, if any, that resulted from such failure to comply on the Dayton project? ... B. The injury to Solis' credit reputation, if any, that was a natural, probable, and foreseeable consequence of [Green's] failure to comply. As discussed above, the no-damages-for-delay clause is valid and enforceable. The damages from injury to Solis' credit reputation are barred by the no-damages-for-delay clause.