Opinion ID: 2576202
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Did the Industrial Commission Err in Denying Reese Total Temporary Disability Benefits During His Period of Recovery from the Surgery Performed by Dr. Jorgensen?

Text: In addition to medical benefits related to Dr. Jorgensen's surgery, Reese also sought TTD benefits for the period of his recovery from that surgery. The Commission denied the TTD benefits on the ground that Reese had failed to obtain permission before seeking medical care from Dr. Jorgensen. Because we are reversing the Commission's order with respect to the medical benefits, we also reverse its order with respect to the income benefits for TTD. We note, however, that the Commission has misconstrued Idaho Code §§ 72-408 and 72-432(4)(a). Had Reese failed to comply with Idaho Code § 72-432(4)(a) when seeking medical care from Dr. Jorgensen, V-1 would not have been obligated to pay for such care. The statute states, If proper notice is not given, the employer shall not be obligated to pay for the services obtained. The statute does not provide, however, that such services shall be deemed as being unrelated to the work-related injury. Idaho Code § 72-408 entitles an injured employee to income benefits for total and partial disability during the period of recovery. The entitlement to income benefits is not dependent upon the employee complying with Idaho Code § 72-432(4)(a).