Opinion ID: 1931243
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 15

Heading: Substantial Evidence for Almony

Text: We reverse the Circuit Court's holdings. There was substantial evidence to support the Division's findings that Almony violated ง 13-301(1) and (3) of the Consumer Protection Act through misrepresenting comparable sales. JUDGMENT OF THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY AFFIRMED IN PART AND REVERSED IN PART. CASE REMANDED TO THAT COURT WITH DIRECTIONS TO REMAND THIS ACTION TO THE CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION WITH DIRECTIONS TO VACATE ITS ORDER OF OCTOBER 22, 2002 IN PART AND TO ENTER A NEW ORDER CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION. COSTS TO BE PAID FORTY PERCENT BY MORGAN, FORTY PERCENT BY SHPRITZ, TEN PERCENT BY ALMONY, AND TEN PERCENT BY THE CONSUMER PROTECTION DIVISION.