Opinion ID: 1868375
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: the bond requirement

Text: In the March 15, 2002 order enjoining the sale of Ferrellgas stock, the trial court concluded that a bond was not required to provide for its enforcement. [19] We disagree. CR 65.05(1) provides: No restraining order or temporary injunction shall be granted except upon the giving of a bond by the applicant, with surety, in such sum as the court or the officer to whom application is made deems proper, for the payment of such costs and damages as may be incurred or suffered by any person who is found to have been wrongfully restrained or enjoined. The address of the surety shall be shown on the bond. The rule unquestionably requires that a bond accompany an order granting temporary injunction relief, [20] and the trial court erred when it enjoined the stock sales without requiring Janie Lewis to post a bond sufficient in amount to protect Appellants.