Opinion ID: 2804082
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: standard of review

Text: We review de novo a district court’s denial of a motion for judgment as a matter of law under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b). Barnes v. City of Cincinnati, 401 F.3d 729, 736 (6th Cir. 2005). Judgment on the motion may only be granted where, “when viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, giving that party the benefit of all reasonable inferences, there is no genuine issue of material fact for the jury, and reasonable minds could come to but one conclusion in favor of the moving party.” Id. “The evidence should not be weighed, and the credibility of the witnesses should not be questioned. The judgment of this court should not be substituted for that of the jury.” Balsley v. FLP, Inc., 691 F.3d 747, 757 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Williams v. Nashville Network, 132 F.3d 1123, 113031 (6th Cir. 1997)).