Opinion ID: 46
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Peterson's Testimony

Text: Appellants also called Peterson, primarily to refute Ramos and Rivera's testimony concerning Ms. Cameron's allegedly disheveled appearance and strange behavior. Appellants' Br. 42. On cross, Appellees elicited testimony that, after speaking with Ramos and Rivera, Peterson thought that probable cause existed to arrest Cameron and had no reason to doubt the officers' account of the facts that day. J.A. 353. (Appellants did not object to this testimony.) He also testified that he saw the security camera photos [a] long time after the arrest, and said over objection that they did not change his opinion about the arrests. J.A. 359. Appellees also asked Peterson a second time if there was probable cause to arrest Cameron for the crimes she was charged with, but the District Court sustained Appellants' objection and the question went unanswered.