Opinion ID: 668267
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Criminal History Calculation Upon Remand

Text: 15 The proper criminal history calculation for the three February 19, 1991 convictions accordingly starts with (1) the enhanced February 19, 1991 conviction (the suspended sentence plus the one-year sentence Streat received when his probation was revoked), and (2) the two unenhanced February 19, 1991 convictions. Section 4A1.1 then requires the sentencing court to determine the proper sentence of imprisonment for each of these three convictions. Section 4A1.2(b)(2) makes clear that the term sentence of imprisonment refers only to the portion [of the sentence] that was not suspended. The one-year sentence Streat received when his probation was revoked accordingly yields two criminal history points, U.S.S.G. Sec. 4A1.1(b), and the other two unenhanced convictions are counted at one point each, U.S.S.G. Sec. 4A1.1(c). 16 The two unenhanced, one-point convictions, when combined with the four prior convictions not at issue in this appeal (also valued at one point each), produce a total of six one-point criminal history points. Section 4A1.1(c), however, limits the total number of one-point sentences to four. Thus, upon remand, Streat should receive four points for the one-point convictions and two points for the sentence imposed upon probation revocation. In addition, a proper calculation of Streat's criminal history category will take into account any points Streat should receive for the commission of the present offense while under a criminal justice sentence, and for the commission of the present offense within two years of his release from custody.