Opinion ID: 3158935
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: the relatives of either; or

Text: C. any other person under the age of twenty-one in the care of any of the above . . . . This broad coverage is limited by an exclusion for bodily injury or property damage resulting from an “intentional loss,” which we discuss infra. 2 Metropolitan offered alternative theories in its motion for summary judgment, but the Superior Court based its decision on only the intentional loss exclusion, and Metropolitan argues only that issue. The other issues are deemed waived as a result of Metropolitan’s failure to address them. See Holland v. Sebunya, 2000 ME 160, ¶ 9 n.6, 759 A.2d 205 (“The failure to mention an issue in the brief or at argument is construed as either an abandonment or a failure to preserve that issue.”). 3 This decision omits the boldface type that Metropolitan employs for certain words and phrases in its policy. 4