Opinion ID: 2791136
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Plaintiff’s Third EEO Complaint

Text: While the investigation of her second EEO complaint was ongoing, Plaintiff filed a third EEO complaint in January 2012. In her third complaint, Plaintiff cited eight allegedly retaliatory incidents that occurred between July 2011 and December 2011. One such incident was Plaintiff’s November 2011 performance review in which her proficiency rating was downgraded to “satisfactory.” The other incidents included Johnson: discussing Plaintiff’s patients in two group meetings, finalizing and distributing an on-call schedule without Plaintiff’s knowledge, and ignoring two of her emails. In addition, Plaintiff complained that she found out by accident that her request for one day of annual leave was denied, that she similarly learned by accident about a meeting between the infectious disease section and pharmacy staff, and that she was not told that a blood test was no longer available for her to order for her patients.