Opinion ID: 1234828
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: the doctrine of continuing representation is specifically barred by statute

Text: Fairway asks this Court to adopt the doctrine of continuing representation. Under that doctrine the statute of limitations is tolled during the time the attorney continues to represent the client and, therefore, an action does not accrue until the client terminates the relationship with the attorney. The theory is that the client has a right to repose confidence in the professional's ability and good faith, and realistically cannot be expected to question and assess the techniques employed or the manner in which the services are rendered. Greene v. Greene, 56 N.Y.2d 86, 451 N.Y.S.2d 46, 50, 436 N.E.2d 496, 500 (1982). The Idaho legislature has specifically precluded extending the statute of limitations based upon any continuing professional relationship. I.C. § 5-219(4) provides that the limitation period shall not be extended by reason of any continuing consequences or damages resulting therefrom or any continuing professional or commercial relationship between the injured party and the alleged wrongdoer.... Based upon this clear statement from the legislature, we hold that the doctrine of continuing representation in professional malpractice actions is specifically barred by statute.