Opinion ID: 2547960
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: In reviewing the district court's decision on a motion for summary judgment, the standard of review is whether there are any genuine issues of material fact, and, if not, whether the prevailing party was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Sacred Heart Med. Ctr. v. Boundary County, 138 Idaho 534, 535, 66 P.3d 238, 239 (Idaho 2003). If the evidence shows no disputed issues of fact, what remains is a question of law, over which the appellate court exercises free review. Id. Therefore, legal questions resolved by a district court are subject to de novo review by this Court. Doolittle v. Meridian Joint Sch. Dist., 128 Idaho 805, 811, 919 P.2d 334, 340 (1996); see Iron Eagle Dev., L.L.C. v. Quality Design Sys., Inc., 138 Idaho 487, 491, 65 P.3d 509, 513 (2003).