Opinion ID: 2550875
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Subjected to Cumulative Prosecutorial Misconduct

Text: In support of this contention, Respondent references only the prosecutorial misconduct, discussed above. This court's recent decision in State v. Tosh, 278 Kan. 83, 91 P.3d 1204 (2004), provides a two-step analysis under which we analyze allegations of prosecutorial misconduct in criminal cases. This court need not reach the Tosh analysis here, however, because Respondent fails to complain of any specific instance of conduct, accusing the Disciplinary Administrator only of general vindictiveness. In truth, in view of Respondent's many wild unsupported allegations, in appears to us the Disciplinary Administrator has been extremely patient and professional throughout these proceedings. Respondent's argument on this point is incoherent and lacks merit.