Opinion ID: 1697798
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 12

Heading: Sanctions Imposed by Professional Boards and Litigation

Text: Roseberry's numerous sanctions against his professional licenses and a court finding that he breached a fiduciary duty trigger alarm bells. [6] Some offenses were never adequately explained. For example, in two instances, Roseberry was sanctioned for fighting and for an altercation in barn area. We have held that 'abusive, disruptive, hostile, intemperate, intimidating, irresponsible, threatening, or turbulent behavior is a proper basis for the denial of admission to the bar.' In re Application of Silva, 266 Neb. 419, 427, 665 N.W.2d 592, 598 (2003). Yet, other than a brief mention on his bar application, Roseberry fails to adequately explain these incidents. In one instance, the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission noted Roseberry's history of various and serious rule violations at different racetracks from 1989 through 1994. The commission also noted the board of stewards' finding that his conduct was unethical, deceptive, objectionable, dishonest, [and] dangerous to the welfare of the public . . . and detrimental to the integrity of racing in the state of Iowa. Although Roseberry attempts to explain the incidents and contends that racetrack sanctions are akin to the normal cost of doing business, the sheer number of offenses undermines his credibility. Roseberry's lack of candor and numerous sanctions are impossible to ignore and speak strongly against his fitness and character to practice law. Finally, we find a lack of rehabilitation. Although Roseberry had witnesses testify about his good character, the record shows a long history of questionable conduct. We find no persuasive evidence that Roseberry's character has changed or that he has been rehabilitated. Because of the numerous instances of professional sanctions, litigation, and failure to reveal required information, we determine that the Commission did not err when it denied Roseberry's application. The record shows a consistent pattern of misconduct and a lack of candor, and we find his excuses unpersuasive. The recommendation of the Commission to deny Roseberry's application is affirmed. APPLICATION DENIED.