Opinion ID: 628059
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Whether the prosecutions of Adams and Runkel were violations of double jeopardy.

Text: 8 B. Whether the district court erred by refusing to suppress statements made by Adams upon confrontation with Customs agents. 9 C. Whether the district court erred by refusing to suppress evidence seized from the aircraft in which Adams and Runkel were riding. 10 D. Whether the district court erred by refusing to sever Adams and Cohron from the main trial. 11 E. Whether the district court correctly determined the quantity of contraband for the sentences of Adams and Davis. 12 F. Whether the evidence was sufficient to convict Cohron. 13 G. Whether the district court erred by applying the mandatory minimum sentence to Cohron. 14 H. Whether Davis and Jones were denied a fair trial by the district court's allowing witnesses to testify in prison garb. 15