Opinion ID: 1888492
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: on second suggestion of error

Text: October 5, 1953 37 Adv. S. 30 67 So.2d 251 LEE, J. A suggestion of error was overruled in this case on July 3, 1953, (Miss.), 65 So.2d 839. Appellant has now filed what he denominates as Suggestion of Error, Motion to set aside Judgment, to Stay Mandate and for Other Relief. The Court deems that the contents of this complaint, except that part with reference to striking certain language from the opinion, in fact, constitutes a second suggestion of error, and, for that reason, can not be entertained. Section 3, Rule 14, Revised Rules 1953. While adhering to the original decision, the Court did not then, and does not now, intend any reflection on the high personal and professional reputation of appellant's counsel. Consequently, the words in the opinion, to-wit: This was highly improper and unfair and was condemned in Avent v. Tucker, supra, are ordered stricken, and in lieu thereof are substituted the following: It was proper for plaintiff's counsel to reply to this. That part of the suggestion which has been deemed a second suggestion of error is dismissed, and that part which has been treated as a suggestion of error on a motion, is sustained. Suggestion of error generally dismissed, but applicable part sustained in part.