Opinion ID: 864170
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: perma septic tank company, inc.

Text: A. WHETHER PERMA SEPTIC WAS GUILTY OF CONVERSION BECAUSE ITS POSSESSION OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AT ALL TIMES WAS PURSUANT TO AN ORDER OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF LOWNDES COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI. ¶19. Pursuant to M.R.A.P. 28(i), Perma Septic, in its brief, adopted certain portions of Greenline's brief. ¶20. Perma Septic argues that the circuit court erred by holding it liable for conversion. Specifically, Perma Septic argues that it was an innocent purchaser, and in so doing, Perma Septic draws our attention to the following passages from 30 Am. Jur. 2D, Executions and Enforcement of Judgments: § 586 - Generally. The purchaser at an execution sale is generally entitled to be returned to status quo, so far as possible, where an execution sale is set aside because of an irregularity in or invalidity of the proceedings....