Opinion ID: 173618
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Whether the district court abused its discretion in striking the declarations of O. Salah and D. Chatterjee

Text: The district court ordered the parties, when submitting declarations, to identify which motion those declarations supported. The court further warned the parties that [f]ailure to identify the declarations in this manner will result in their being stricken and not considered by the court. (D.Ct.doc.132.) Subsequent to the district court's order, Plaintiffs submitted to the court the declarations of O. Salah and D. Chatterjee, but failed to identify the motion Plaintiffs sought to support with those declarations. The district court, therefore, struck them. The court did not abuse its discretion in doing so. [6] See Jones v. Barnhart, 349 F.3d 1260, 1270 (10th Cir.2003) (reviewing decision regarding motion to strike for an abuse of discretion).