Opinion ID: 4534834
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: B.; et al.,

Text: Plaintiffs-Appellees, SHERLENE WONG; LAWRENCE WONG, Objectors-Appellees, v. PRELUDE FERTILITY, INC., Defendant-Appellant, 2 and CHART INDUSTRIES, INC.; et al., Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jacqueline Scott Corley, Magistrate Judge, Presiding Submitted April 16, 2020 San Francisco, California Before: HAWKINS and PAEZ, Circuit Judges, and RESTANI, Judge. In this consolidated appeal, Appellants Chart Industries, Inc. (“Chart”), Pacific MSO, LLC (“MSO”), and Prelude Fertility, Inc. (“Prelude”) seek review of the district court’s order denying their motions to compel arbitration. We have jurisdiction over this interlocutory appeal under 9 U.S.C. § 16(a)(1)(C), and our review is de novo. Kramer v. Toyota Motor Corp., 705 F.3d 1122, 1124, 1127 (9th Cir. 2013). We affirm as to Chart and reverse as to MSO and Prelude. Appellants are non-signatories to the Informed Consent Agreements (“ICA”) Plaintiffs signed with Pacific Fertility Center (“PFC”), which contained an arbitration provision and a separate arbitration agreement for any dispute related to