Opinion ID: 447575
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: 9 In reviewing a district court's order granting summary judgment, we must view the evidence, and make all inferences from that evidence, in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted. See, e.g., Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. v. MCA, Inc., 715 F.2d 1327, 1328-29 (9th Cir.1983). In that light, we must determine whether there is any genuine issue of material fact in dispute and whether the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. See M/V American Queen v. San Diego Marine Construction Corp., 708 F.2d 1483, 1487 (9th Cir.1983). We have emphasized that [w]here a contract's meaning is not clear on its face, its interpretation depends upon the parties' intent at the time it was executed, which is an issue for the trier of fact. Laborers Health & Welfare Trust Fund v. Kaufman & Broad, 707 F.2d 412, 418 (9th Cir.1983) (citations omitted). 10