Opinion ID: 1834364
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: mistrial to retrial

Text: A chronology of events is included at this point. Event Date MISTRIAL ......................................................... 12-16-86 Court Appointed Attorney # 2 ..................................... 12-19-86 Court Appointed Attorney # 3 (medical w/drawal of attorney # 2) .. 01-09-87 Motion to Dismiss filed, Speedy Trial ............................ 03-05-87 Motion to Dismiss taken under Advisement ......................... 03-16-87 Privately Employed Attorney, ..................................... 05-08-87 Handley's Motion to continue filed ............................... 05-15-87 Motion to Continue Granted ....................................... 05-21-87 2d TRIAL ......................................................... 06-17-87 184 days from Mistrial Once again it is necessary to assess and weigh the facts of this case in light of the Barker factors, supra, to determine if the 184 day delay between mistrial and retrial violated Handley's Constitutional right to a speedy trial.