Opinion ID: 6337433
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Admission of Cell-Phone Evidence

Text: Defendant also challenges the admission of cell-phone evidence, apparently text messages from several phones. At different parts of his briefs he complains that the evidence was hearsay or irrelevant and that the government improperly delayed disclosure of the evidence before trial. 11 Appellate Case: 20-2180 Document: 010110679053 Date Filed: 05/03/2022 Page: 12 For this court to properly assess the validity of these arguments, Defendant would need to describe in some detail the specifics of the challenged evidence, the basis of the challenges, the responses to the challenges, and the grounds on which the district court rejected the challenges. In the absence of this information, which Defendant has not provided, we see no basis to overturn the rulings of the district court.