Opinion ID: 14230
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: conclusion

Text: For the foregoing reasons, we find the district court committed no plain error when it applied the cocaine base guideline. However, we stress that district judges should clearly find, on the record, that the cocaine base involved is in fact “crack.” It is clear from the record that the district However, Brewster only argues ineffective assistance of counsel with regard to his plea. As such, we only address his claim of ineffective assistance of counsel at his plea hearing. 11 court complied with Rule 11 and did not abuse its discretion in denying Brewster’s motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Also, we find that the district court did not err in determining Brewster to be a career offender under the Sentencing Guidelines. Accordingly, Brewster’s conviction is AFFIRMED.