Opinion ID: 3014170
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 5

Heading: disposition of this matter should it be

Text: determined that Andrx was erroneously In light of the foregoing analysis, enjoined. In determining the amount of we conclude that the district court clearly such bond, the district court should, of erred in denying Kos’s motion for a course, take into account Andrx’s ability preliminary injunction. We therefore to minimize the potential for such reverse and remand with instructions that damages. See supra p. 61. To that end, the district court fashion and enter, on an the court may wish to shape the expedited basis, an order preliminarily preliminary injunction, or set its effective enjoin ing Andrx from using the date, to allow Andrx to take reasonable, ALTOCOR mark in connection with the expeditious steps to begin marketing its marketing and sale of its extended-release product under another name. 39