Opinion ID: 75623
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: 13 (1) Whether the district court erred in denying Liss's motion to sever. 14 (2) Whether the district court erred in denying Liss's motion to dismiss the superseding indictment's single conspiracy charge. 15 (3) Whether the district court erred in applying an abuse of trust enhancement to Liss's sentence.
16 (1) Whether Spuza is entitled to a new trial because he was misjoined for trial with alleged co-conspirator Liss and their trials should have been severed. 17 (2) Whether the district court erred in applying the sentencing guidelines by including the office rental and equipment sublease payments in its calculation of the amount of loss. 18 (3) Whether the district court erred by imposing an upward adjustment for abuse of trust. 19 (4) Whether the district court erred by concluding it lacked the authority to consider a downward departure for lesser harms under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.11. 20 (5) Whether the district court erred by ordering Spuza to pay restitution to the government.