Opinion ID: 1264038
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Gall error

Text: Jones also alleges the district court committed Gall error by failing to make an individualized assessment of the defendant's case based on the facts presented. The issue is properly preserved and we review for abuse of discretion. Bain, 537 F.3d at 881. While the district court's explanation of its individualized assessment was brief, it is clear from the record that the court made an individualized assessment. At the conclusion of the hearing the court reviewed a list of the relevant § 3553(a) factors contained in defendant's memorandum and confirmed that I've taken all of these factors into consideration. While a district court commits procedural error if it fails to consider the § 3553(a) factors, it need not recite all the factors on the record, nor is it required to make a specific rejoinder to each argument advanced by the defendant. United States v. Barron, 557 F.3d 866, 868 (8th Cir.2009) (internal citations omitted).