Opinion ID: 2582271
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: This Case Is Distinguishable from French v. Jadon, Inc.

Text: The court relies on French v. Jadon, Inc . [5] for the proposition that Mahan must offer more than her own subjective impressions to establish a link between the alleged sexual harassment and her subsequent firing. But Mahan's case is distinguishable from French because, unlike the plaintiff in French, Mahan points to specific instances of sexual advances at both camps, and she asserts that one of her alleged harassers was among those who assigned her extra work at Alpine. [6] As noted above, Mahan alleges in her affidavit that Gobaleza and Harris made sexual advances toward her at both camps, that Harris assigned her a tremendous amount of extra work at Alpine, and that Harris was [at Alpine] the day [she] was fired from [her] job up there. Whether this evidence would ultimately persuade a jury is unclear, but it certainly amounts to more than just Mahan's own subjective impressions.