Opinion ID: 1536001
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: cross-appellants' contentions

Text: On April 14, 1998, the Petitioners cross-appealed. The Petitioners have raised four separate issues. First, they allege that the Court of Chancery erred, as a matter of law, by requiring the Petitioners to establish bad faith to support an award of costs. Second, the Petitioners contend that the Court of Chancery erred in rejecting certain aspects of the valuation analysis performed by the Petitioners' expert witness. Third, the Petitioners submit that the Court of Chancery made various erroneous evidentiary rulings. Fourth, the Petitioners argue that the Court of Chancery erred in denying their request that the Respondents be assessed attorneys' fees and expert witness fees.