Opinion ID: 760527
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: 9 We review a grant of summary judgment de novo. Blue Ridge Ins. Co. v. Stanewich, 142 F.3d 1145, 1147 (9th Cir.1998). We must determine, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, whether there are any genuine issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the law. Id. [T]he question of whether a fine is constitutionally excessive calls for the application of a constitutional standard to the facts of a particular case, and in this context de novo review of that question is appropriate. United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321, ---- - ---- n. 10, 118 S.Ct. 2028, 2037-38 n. 10, 141 L.Ed.2d 314 (1998) (citing Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 697, 116 S.Ct. 1657, 134 L.Ed.2d 911 (1996)).