Opinion ID: 671214
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Schoolyard Provision

Text: 21 Moore's final assignment of error is that the schoolyard specification in count one is defective because it charges more than one offense. Moore did not raise this objection in the district court. Although Moore's reply brief lists a number of objections that were raised in the district court to count one (the measurement to the school, the foundation and admissibility of the evidence, etc.), none of these pertain to the specific issue regarding the duplicitous charge. When a defendant fails to raise an objection to the district court and the factual basis for the objection is apparent, the objection is waived under Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(f). United States v. Woods, 544 F.2d 242 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 429 U.S. 1062 (1977). Moore has waived this objection.