Opinion ID: 2020963
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 9

Heading: As To The Defendant, Warner

Text: Warner has assigned the following nine errors: (1) Did the court err in precluding interrogation on cross examination of a State's witness which, it is argued, may have brought forth testimony reflecting adversely upon the witness' credibility? (2) Did the court err in admitting two prior, out-of-court statements of Debra Cunningham, as substantive evidence? (3) Did the court err in admitting evidence of Warner's prior criminal act? (4) Did the court err in refusing to admonish the jury to disregard a question and answer that were the foundation for an impeachment upon a collateral matter? (5) Did the alleged errors relative to the above mentioned assignments, if harmless individually, operate cumulatively to deny Warner a fair trial upon the merits? (6) Was the verdict, as to Warner, sustained by the evidence? (7) Did the court err in not ruling upon a motion for a mistrial predicated upon surprise? (8) Did the court err in requiring Warner to leave the courtroom during a portion of the proceedings? (9) Was the sentence imposed upon Warner excessive?