Opinion ID: 1277356
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Subsequent Criminal Activity

Text: We repeatedly have rejected claims, identical to that made by defendant, that criminal activity occurring subsequent to the commission of the charged offense is inadmissible under section 190.3, factor (b). (See, e.g., People v. Balderas (1985) 41 Cal.3d 144, 201-204, 222 Cal.Rptr. 184, 711 P.2d 480; see also People v. Hovey (1988) 44 Cal.3d 543, 577-579, 244 Cal.Rptr. 121, 749 P.2d 776.) Defendant urges this court to reconsider that line of case authority, but fails to provide us with a persuasive basis for reconsidering our prior holdings. We therefore decline to do so.