Opinion ID: 3013595
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Bases for the Conditions

Text: Landry first contends that the District Court failed to state bases for any of the three challenges conditions and that the record is devoid of any such basis for their imposition. Even if we were to agree with the former contention, we find that the pre-sentencing report, explicitly adopted by the District Court, provides ample support for the conditions. The internet restriction is supported by the fact that Landry used that medium to trade child pornography for identification information. Thus, 8 the internet facilitated his creation of forged documents and opened an avenue up for him to disseminate child pornography, potentially including materials that he himself created. Similarly, the work restriction finds support in his apparent attraction to minors and willingness to exploit them for his own benefit. Admittedly, the drug treatment order finds less robust support in the record, but his teenage substance abuse and more recent substance-based suicide attempt provide sufficient support, given the extraordinarily deferential standard of review that we must apply.