Opinion ID: 863328
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: conclusion

Text: ¶25. For the foregoing reasons, the chancery court's judgment is affirmed. ¶26. AFFIRMED. PITTMAN, C.J., BANKS AND McRAE, P.JJ., SMITH, MILLS, COBB, DIAZ AND EASLEY, JJ., CONCUR. 1. This CD was issued on March 18, 1988, payable to Mamie Dunn or Kathleen Harwood, and set to mature on September 18, 1990. On April 10, 1991, a second CD was issued in lieu of the March 18, 1988, CD in the name of Mamie Dunn or Harold Harwood or Sara Reilly, with a maturity date of March 18, 1993. On March 3, 1993, the CD was stamped paid, and a third CD was issued in the amount of $59, 000 to Mamie Dunn or Harold Harwood or Sara Reilly, with a maturity date of March 31, 1998. 2. Apparently this was a fourth CD. No other history of this CD was presented to the trial court other than the fact it was in the name of Mamie Dunn or Harold Harwood or Sara Reilly, and was worth $48,658.14. 3. Actually, two of the CD's matured after Reilly was appointed as Dunn's durable power of attorney. One of the CD's was cashed in on July 13, 1998, (shortly after Harold's death), with the money being used to purchase another CD, in the name of Mamie W. Dunn or Sara W. Reilly. The second CD matured about three months after Dunn's death. The proceeds from this CD were used to purchase another CD, in the name of Sara Reilly only. 4. Crist and Ford did not seek return of the approximate $20,000 their father Harold received from the cashed CD.