Opinion ID: 6320768
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: standard of review

Text: We review the Court of Federal Claims’ legal conclusions de novo and its factual findings for clear error. Casitas Mun. Water Dist. v. United States, 708 F.3d 1340, 1351 (Fed. Cir. 2013) (citing Est. of Hage v. United States, 687 F.3d 1281, 1285 (Fed. Cir. 2012)). Whether a document was actually mailed on a given date is a question of fact. See Rosenthal, 111 U.S. at 193–94. The ultimate conclusion of whether the Court of Federal Claims properly dismissed an action for lack of jurisdiction is a question of law, which we review de novo. Walby v. United States, 957 F.3d 1295, 1298 (Fed. Cir. 2020).