Opinion ID: 2639631
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 9

Heading: Reasonable likelihood of success on the merits

Text: In arriving at our conclusion that the district court abused its discretion when it granted the preliminary injunction, we first determine that NRS Chapter 116 applies. We next conclude that Andrews is a land-owning declarant. However, we hold that the Association did not need Andrews' consent to eliminate section 5.04 from the CC & Rs because the clause from section 9.04(a) that required Andrews' consent as a land-owning declarant is void for being in violation of NRS 116.2107(4). Further, we conclude that it was proper for the Association to vote on the proposed amendment by mail, instead of at a meeting. Thus, because we conclude that the Association properly amended the CC & Rs to eliminate section 5.04, Andrews has failed to demonstrate a reasonable likelihood of success on the merits and the grant of the preliminary injunction must be reversed.