Opinion ID: 60760
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: conclusion

Text: Munguia-Ramirez appeals his conviction for conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine. Because the district court’s Rule 11 plea colloquy in this case was without error, and because the record before us does not support Munguia-Ramirez’s claim that his guilty plea or appeal waiver was unknowing or involuntary due to his counsel’s estimate of the ultimate sentence or any other outside factors, we AFFIRM his conviction. We decline, however, to consider his ineffective assistance of counsel claim because the record is insufficiently developed. 1 Munguia-Ramirez may wish to pursue this claim under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Bender, 290 F.3d at 1284. 10