Opinion ID: 1372628
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: Relitigation of Facts of Prior Violent Act.

Text: (37) Defendant contends that his conviction of battery required the exclusion of evidence of his battery of one of his former girlfriends. First, defendant concedes that he did not attempt to substitute the record of the conviction for the testimony given at trial. His claim is thus procedurally barred. ( People v. Pinholster, supra, 1 Cal.4th at p. 960.) In any event, we have rejected similar contentions many times, and decline to reconsider the issue now. ( People v. Frank (1990) 51 Cal.3d 718, 730 [274 Cal. Rptr. 372, 798 P.2d 1215].) [7]