Opinion ID: 2544078
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: The June 2003 cattle-business loan

Text: ¶ 21. As with the arbitration agreements for the Appleridge Estates deed of trust, it appears once again that Donna's and the Bank's respective experts did not review the same document and that they based their opinions on two different documents. ¶ 22. Donna's expert, Foley, concluded that the arbitration agreement for the June 2003 cattle-business loan, numbered 6803148, was forged by Donna's husband, Mike. The Bank's expert, Sperry, countered that Donna had signed an arbitration agreement dated June 16, 2003. But the agreement that Sperry referenced pertained to a different loanloan number 6803091. He provided no opinion as to any arbitration agreement associated with the June 2003 cattle-business loan, numbered 6803148, which is the loan that is relevant to this case. ¶ 23. We cannot say that the trial court clearly erred in finding that Donna did not sign any arbitration agreement for the June 2003 cattle-business loan.