Opinion ID: 2510020
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 14

Heading: Character and Fitness

Text: Finally, we agree with ODC that Respondent should be required to appear before the Committee on Character and Fitness if he chooses to seek reinstatement. The Panel concluded that Dr. Taylor's testimony raise[d] serious questions about Respondent's capacity to practice law unless he continues to make substantial progress in his treatment for Asperger's Syndrome and suggested Respondent receive close treatment and observation if [he] seeks to return to the active practice of law, but did not recommend screening by the Committee on Character and Fitness prior to reinstatement. As an initial observation, the instant case presents several egregious acts of misconduct. We are very concerned about Respondent's failure to heed directives from state and federal judges, and to communicate with his clients and ODC. While we find Respondent's actions reprehensible, we are also sympathetic to Respondent's recent diagnosis. However, we must weigh this sympathy against our duty to protect the public from lawyers who may lack the present ability to adequately represent their clients in the courts of this State. Dr. Taylor testified Asperger's patients have the ability to learn to control the kinds of behaviors that led to these proceedings. It is our hope that Respondent will continue to thrive in his treatment plan. However, as an added protection to the public, we find it prudent to require Respondent to appear before the Committee on Character and Fitness if he chooses to petition for reinstatement. The Committee on Character and Fitness is in the best position to ensure Respondent's continued compliance with his treatment plan and will make an informed recommendation concerning Respondent's ability to practice law. [8]