Opinion ID: 202467
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: The defendant shall submit his person,

Text: residence, office or vehicle to a search, conducted by a United States Probation Officer at a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner, based upon reasonable suspicion of contraband or evidence of a violation of a condition of release; failure to submit to a search may be grounds for revocation; the defendant shall warn any other residents that the premises may be subject to searches pursuant to this condition.3 3 We will refer to these conditions as the financial disclosure condition and the search condition. -4- After filing this appeal, on February 18, 2004, Sepúlveda's counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), requesting to withdraw. We rejected this request and ordered counsel to file a merits brief addressing: (1) whether the district court violated Sepúlveda's right to be present at sentencing by imposing the two non-mandatory, non-standard conditions in the written judgment without first announcing them at oral argument; and (2) whether the district court improperly delegated to the probation officer the responsibility for determining the number of drug tests Sepúlveda must undergo while on supervised release.