Opinion ID: 3166768
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: ) 1947A rte>

Text: unfit parent and failed to adjust the circumstances that led to the children's removal. See A.J.G., 122 Nev. at 1423, 148 P.3d at 763. Because appellant's failure to complete her individual counseling and address her mental health issues prevented her from attending family counseling with the children, substantial evidence supports the district court's finding that the children are at risk of mental or emotional injury if returned to appellant. Id. Additionally, appellant failed to rebut the presumption in NRS 128.109(1)(a) (1999) (amended 2015) that she had demonstrated only token efforts to eliminate the risk of injury to the children as they had resided outside of her care for 14 of 20 consecutive months at the time of trial . Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED. 2 710.4.31. j. Parraguitir , J. Douglas Cherry cc: Hon. Cynthia N. Giuliani, District Judge, Family Court Division Angi L.A. Clark County District Attorney/Juvenile Division Gentile, Cristalli, Miller, Armeni & Savarese, PLLC Eighth District Court Clerk 2To the extent appellant's arguments are not addressed in this order, we conclude they lack merit. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 4 (0) 1947A