Opinion ID: 3164781
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: Denial of a Request to Amend

Text: Finally, Appellants argue that the district court erred by denying their request to amend their pleadings. Appellants filed an amended complaint after several Appellees moved to dismiss the original complaint. Thus, Appellants challenge the denial of their second amended complaint. We review this denial for an abuse of discretion. See Goldstein v. MCI WorldCom, 340 F.3d 238, 255 (5th Cir. 2003). The district court found that the Appellants did not put forth any new information or show a change in the law. On appeal, the 6 Case: 15-40570 Document: 00513317512 Page: 7 Date Filed: 12/22/2015 No. 15-40570 Appellants do not indicate what additional information they would plead “to provide sufficient detail in the Court’s eyes.” The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Appellants a second opportunity to amend.