Opinion ID: 2747892
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Scope of detention

Text: Mr. Burtons also argues the scope of the detention exceeded its initial justification. He contends Officer Springer did not have reasonable suspicion to frisk him or to detain him an additional 30 to 45 minutes to wait for the canine unit to arrive. Mr. Burtons, however, failed to make these arguments in the district court. He argued only that the initial detention was unlawful and tainted the subsequently discovered evidence. “When a motion to suppress evidence is raised for the first time on appeal, we must decline review.” United States v. Hamilton, 587 F.3d 1199, 1213 (10th Cir. 2009) -11- (quotations omitted). Under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 12(e), “[a] party waives any Rule 12(b)(3)3 defense, objection, or request not raised by the [pre-trial] deadline,” absent a showing of good cause. Fed. R. Crim. P. 12(e). “[T]his waiver provision applies not only to the failure to make a pre-trial motion, but also the failure to include a particular argument in the motion.” United States v. Dewitt, 946 F.2d 1497, 1502 (10th Cir. 1991). We conclude Mr. Burtons has waived these arguments he failed to raise in the district court.