Opinion ID: 1839257
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: issues

Text: Not specifically addressed in the trial court's judgment is Smith's assertion of the affirmative defenses of waiver, laches, estoppel, and the applicable statute of limitations. Smith claims that the equitable doctrines of waiver and laches defeat the plaintiffs' claim because the plaintiffs delayed 14 years before bringing this action for Smith's removal as sole member of the Architectural Control Committee. Further, says Smith, under Ala.Code 1975, § 6-2-34(6) (Actions for the use and occupation of land), the plaintiffs' action is barred by the applicable six-year statute of limitations. We hold that the facts of the instant case do not invoke the application of § 6-2-34(6), and that the doctrine of laches does not bar this action, because Smith has not shown that the delay in bringing this action resulted in any prejudice to him. See Darden v. Meadows, 259 Ala. 676, 68 So.2d 709 (1953). Because we find no basis for reversal, the judgment of the trial court is hereby affirmed. AFFIRMED. HORNSBY, C.J., and SHORES, ADAMS and HOUSTON, JJ., concur.