Opinion ID: 3010232
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Judith Wimbs

Text: Appellants' Brief, p.8. The district court's Findings of Fact does not clarify this point, because it states merely that the district justice held a hearing on Cinea's claim and one on her mother's claim, and subsequently ordered the release of some of the property. App. 36. Our review of the district justice's property release order was similarly unavailing; that document simply releases all property except certain enumerated items, without indicating whether the property released belonged to Cinea or to her mother. 5 On November 21, 1991, a district justice entered an order of eviction and a $1,107 money judgment against Judith Wimbs. She subsequently moved to a new address, where Constable Certo levied upon enumerated items of her personal property in satisfaction of the money judgment, and any and all personal property of the defendant at the address. Like the other plaintiffs in this action, Wimbs was served with a Notice of Levy that forbade her from removing any levied property without an order from the constable; however, unlike the Bernardis and Cinea, she retained possession of the property up until the time of sale. Wimbs neither objected to the levy nor attempted to contact her landlord regarding satisfaction of the judgment. Consequently, the levied property was sold to the landlord.0