Opinion ID: 6353596
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: The Wasilla property

Text: Wright and Dropik agreed that they were joint owners of the Wasilla property. Both of their names were on the title, and they planned to build a house on the property, contributing to a joint bank account to do so. Wright testified that the parties agreed to be “50-50” with respect to the Wasilla property; Dropik testified that the two -3- 7600 “were to split the money going in to acquire the property” and that “everything was equally split short of just a couple of payments.” The parties both presented evidence about contributions to the joint bank account and the cost of improvements to the Wasilla property, including the repair of damage from a fallen tree, the use of heavy machinery to make improvements, a concrete slab, and other miscellaneous costs. The two ended their relationship before the house was built. They sold the property for net proceeds of $60,936.65 in September 2019. The amount was held in Dropik’s counsel’s trust account.