Opinion ID: 1394856
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: rewarning of miranda rights.

Text: State finally contends that Ramones is erroneously arguing that his waiver of Miranda rights turned stale and rewarnings were necessary when Det. Kajiue obtained a waiver as to one crime and commenced interrogation on another offense. Ramones responds that State's contention is a non-issue. Ramones is correct. This is not a true staleness issue. The issue of rewarning is merely the flip side of the first issue: must arrestees be Mirandized for every single statutory offense possible? Once Miranda warnings are given, they need not be given again in the same interrogation even if other offenses materialize or become more appropriate. Colorado, 479 U.S. at ___, 107 S.Ct. at 858, 93 L.Ed.2d at 967.