Opinion ID: 1857499
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: was the verdict against the overwhelming weight of the evidence and did the court err in failing to grant a directed verdict?

Text: B) DID THE COURT ERR IN FAILING TO GRANT THE MOTION IN LIMINE AND IN ALLOWING INTO EVIDENCE PLAINTIFF'S EXHIBIT 4 (THE OIL STICKER)? C) DID THE COURT ERR IN FAILING TO SUSTAIN REGENCY'S OBJECTION TO APPELLANT'S EVIDENCE AND TESTIMONY REGARDING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FAIR MARKET VALUE? D) DID THE COURT ERR IN GRANTING INSTRUCTION P-4 (PLAINTIFF'S DAMAGE INSTRUCTION) AND BY GRANTING A MODIFICATION TO SAME? E) DID THE COURT ERR IN FAILING TO DIRECT A VERDICT OR IN FAILING TO REFORM THE VERDICT IN FAVOR OF REGENCY AGAINST EMBERS AND SCHERMER ET AL., AS WELL AS FAILING TO DIRECT A VERDICT AGAINST SCHERMER, IN LIGHT OF PEREMPTORY INSTRUCTIONS D-21 AND D-24? F) DID THE COURT ERR IN GRANTING ATTORNEY'S FEES TO THE ATTORNEY FOR THE PLAINTIFF/APPELLEE AND IN GRANTING THE AMOUNT AWARDED?