Opinion ID: 1281092
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: I. Did the trial judge err in including Kelley Broome as a defendant on the jury verdict form for the Dealers Act cause of action? II. Did the trial judge err in failing to grant judgment not withstanding the verdict? III. Did the cumulative effect of hearsay testimony deny the appellants their right to a fair trial and due process? IV. Did the trial judge err in failing to grant a mistrial? V. Did the trial judge abuse his discretion in conducting this trial?
I. Did the trial judge abuse his discretion in awarding attorney's fees in an amount that exceeded the contractual amount agreed upon by Mr. and Mrs. Jackson and their counsel and in failing to state facts in the order to support each factor under the reasonableness test? II. Did the trial judge abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a continuance where appellants' attorney was unable to attend due to illness? III. Did the trial judge abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a continuance where all the appellants did not receive adequate notice of the hearing? IV. Did the trial judge abuse his discretion in refusing to strike the motion for attorney's fees because the motion did not comply with Rule 11, SCRCP? V. Does Rule 204, SCACR, prevent the trial judge from determining attorney's fees? VI. Did the trial judge err in awarding costs because he failed to make any findings of fact to support the award?