Opinion ID: 627222
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: remaining evidentiary rulings

Text: Tobin argues that the government failed to provide notice of its intent to cross-examine him on an alleged disciplinary action taken by the South Carolina Medical Board in March 2004. Tobin contends that this violation of Rule 404(b) requires the reversal of his convictions. Tobin concedes that plain error review applies because he did not raise an objection when the government asked the question at trial. We conclude that any error did not affect his substantial rights. United States v. Lejarde-Rada, 319 F.3d 1288, 1289 (11th Cir.2003). As noted, Tobin was asked about disciplinary actions taken by the medical boards of Texas and North Carolina. The brief questioning about whether he had also been disciplined by the South Carolina Medical Board did not add much to the testimony that the jury had already heard. LaCour and Tobin also challenge other of the District Court's evidentiary rulings. We have carefully reviewed the record and find all of [these] contentions to be meritless and without sufficient weight to require discussion. Frink, 912 F.2d at 1415. [22]