Opinion ID: 2633386
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Super Cub

Text: Unlike the cabin site and the Cessna 180, the Super Cub was purchased during the marriage. The trial court made the following finding regarding this plane: A Piper Super Cub was purchased on April 30, 1985. Mr. Green claimed that it was purchased solely with pre-marital funds and was therefor[e] his separate property. Ms. Green disagreed. Conflicting and unclear evidence was offered on this issue. The court does not need to reach that evidentiary issue, because even if it was Mr. Green's separate property as of April 30, 1985, it became a marital asset during the marriage. The trial court's findings of joint use and management and intention to transmute are not clearly erroneous. We therefore find no error in the trial court's inclusion of this plane in the marital estate.