Opinion ID: 2756957
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: [¶2] Although Mr. Silva’s pro se brief does not include a statement of the issues, we discern them to be as follows: 1. Was he denied effective assistance of counsel, both at trial and on appeal? 2. Did the prosecution possess exculpatory evidence that it did not turn over to him, in violation of his constitutional rights recognized in Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963)? The State articulates a different issue, which we paraphrase: 1. Should the district court’s order be summarily affirmed because Mr. Silva’s brief does not comply with many of the requirements of W.R.A.P. 7.01?