Opinion ID: 2301146
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: The Liquor Liability Exclusion

Text: In the instant matter, due to the fact that we have held that coverage is barred by the On-Premises Endorsement, we need not and shall not reach the contention that the liquor liability exclusion also bars coverage. [13] See Furlan v. Farrar, 982 A.2d 581, 585 (R.I.2009); see also PDK Laboratories Inc. v. United States Drug Enforcement Administration, 362 F.3d 786, 799 (D.C.Cir.2004) (Roberts, J., concurring in part) (stating that the cardinal principle of judicial restraint is that if it is not necessary to decide more, it is necessary not to decide more).