Opinion ID: 172707
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: 2005 Federal Habeas Action

Text: Kilgore claims the court erred in failing to toll the time during which his 2005 federal habeas action was pending. Kilgore’s 2005 federal application is not a form of collateral review sufficient to toll the limitations period under § 2244(d)(2). See Duncan 3 Kilgore also claims his first state post-conviction motion was filed on December 30, 1997. The record shows otherwise. Kilgore filed a motion to proceed ifp and for a free transcript that date. He did not file his first state post-conviction motion until June 19, 1998. 5 v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167, 181 (2001) (“§ 2244(d)(2) does not toll the limitation period during the pendency of a federal habeas petition”). Moreover, Kilgore’s failure to appeal from the district court’s order dismissing his 2005 federal habeas action forecloses further consideration of the issues he now raises regarding that dismissal.