Opinion ID: 2623443
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: [¶ 4] Iverson presents the following statement of the issues: I. The decision of the Office of Administrative Hearings, in setting aside its finding of compensability and ordering a contested hearing, was contrary to law and established precedent. II. The decision of the Office of Administrative Hearings was outside the scope of the issues raised in these proceedings and therefore improper. III. The decision of the Office of Administrative Hearings, that Appellant did not timely comply with the requirements of W.S. § 27-14-502(a) (LexisNexis 2001), was contrary to law, established precedent and the great weight of the evidence. IV. The decision of the Office of Administrative Hearings in denying benefits to Appellant was not supported by substantial evidence. Frost does not rephrase any of the issues.