Opinion ID: 617417
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: conclusion

Text: We have considered BiTEK’s remaining arguments and conclude that they are without merit. For the foregoing reasons, the judgment of the district court is O2 MICRO INTL v. BEYOND INNOVATION 22 AFFIRMED NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit __________________________ O2 MICRO INTERNATIONAL LTD., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. BEYOND INNOVATION TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., Defendant-Appellant, and FSP TECHNOLOGY, INC. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SPI ELECTRONIC CO., LTD.), FSP GROUP, AND LIEN CHANG ELECTRONIC ENTERPRISE CO., LTD., Defendants. __________________________ 2011-1054 __________________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas in case no. 04-CV-0032, Magistrate Judge Charles Everingham, IV. __________________________