Opinion ID: 358219
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: The Lesser Included Offense Instruction.

Text: 8 The trial court instructed the jury on the offense of first degree murder and the lesser included offenses of second degree murder and voluntary manslaughter. The court refused appellant's request to instruct the jury on the offense of involuntary manslaughter. Under 18 U.S.C. § 1112, manslaughter, as pertinent, is defined as follows: 9 (a) Manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a human being without malice. It is of two kinds; 10 Voluntary Upon a sudden quarrel or heat of passion. 11 Involuntary In the commission of an unlawful act not amounting to a felony, or in the commission in an unlawful manner, or without due caution and circumspection, of a lawful act which might produce death. 12 Wallette, in contending that he was entitled to an instruction on involuntary manslaughter, refers to his own testimony, in which he described the shooting of Greatwalker as accidental. Wallette testified that he did not remember pulling the trigger and asserted that the gun went off on its own. Appellant, however, did admit thinking about shooting around Greatwalker and in referring to the shooting incident stated that he intended to scare Greatwalker as he had scared Dwayne Azure. 13 In claiming error because of the trial court's failure to instruct on involuntary manslaughter, Wallette relies on our decision in United States v. Thompson, 492 F.2d 359 (8th Cir. 1974). In that case, a shooting incident occurred on a South Dakota Indian Reservation. Defendant Thompson had pointed his .22 caliber rifle at the victim, Mowrer, during the course of an argument relating to Mowrer's alleged trespass on the Thompson ranch. Thompson testified that he unintentionally pulled the trigger as a (r)eflex action, and described the shooting as just an accident. Id. at 361. In Thompson, as in the instant case, the trial court instructed the jury on first degree murder, second degree murder, and voluntary manslaughter, but refused to instruct on involuntary manslaughter. The majority 1 held that ruling amounted to prejudicial error, stating as follows: 14 Section 1153 of Title 18 of the United States Code provides that the offense of assault with a dangerous weapon is to be defined in accordance with the laws of the state in which the alleged crime was committed. The Cheyenne River Indian Reservation lies within South Dakota. Assault with a dangerous weapon under the applicable South Dakota statute requires ()intent to injure or to do bodily harm. Such intent, of course, can be found by the trier of fact from the objective circumstances, including the visible conduct of the actor. It may be found in the face of a denial by a defendant of such an intent, but it need not be. A defendant is entitled to have his testimony that he did not intend to injure or to do bodily harm considered by the jury. (Id. at 362-63.) 15 The factual situations in Thompson and the instant case are similar, but the legal circumstances are different. Involuntary manslaughter is the unlawful killing of a human being without malice in the commission of an unlawful act not amounting to a felony, or in the commission in an unlawful manner, or without due caution and circumspection, of a lawful act which might produce death. 18 U.S.C. § 1112. Wallette's assault on Greatwalker was unlawful. It is therefore necessary to focus on the first part of the involuntary manslaughter definition and determine whether Wallette's conduct amounted to a felony. If some evidence exists warranting a finding that his conduct did not amount to a felony, a jury instruction on involuntary manslaughter would be proper. If, however, the evidence shows his conduct did amount to a felony, Wallette was not entitled to the instruction. To determine whether Wallette's conduct was felonious, we must look to North Dakota law. 2 16 The applicable North Dakota law differs from the South Dakota law pertinent in the Thompson appeal. As distinguished from the South Dakota statute employed in Thompson, which requires an intent to injure or to do bodily harm as an essential element of a felonious assault, relevant North Dakota law reads as follows: 17 Reckless endangerment. A person is guilty of an offense if he creates a substantial risk of serious bodily injury or death to another. The offense is a class C felony if the circumstances manifest his extreme indifference to the value of human life. Otherwise it is a class A misdemeanor. There is risk within the meaning of this section if the potential for harm exists, whether or not a particular person's safety is actually jeopardized. (N.D.Cent.Code § 12.1-17-03 (1976).) 3 18 Here, appellant has testified that he pointed a loaded rifle at his victim with the admitted intent of shooting around Greatwalker and scaring his victim. The transcript discloses the following relevant testimony: 19 Q Why didn't you fire into the ground? 20 A I don't know. That's what I was thinking about, shooting around him or something, so he would listen to me. 21 Q It was just an accident he got hit in the heart? 22 A He could have been hit any place, could have missed. 23 Q You just wanted to scare him like you scared Dwayne? 24 A Yes. 25 Under North Dakota's reckless endangerment statute, the offense, as has been noted, is a class C felony if the circumstances manifest his extreme indifference to the value of human life. In our judgment, reasonable people could not differ that appellant's conduct in intentionally pointing a loaded weapon at his victim with his finger on the trigger, as Wallette admitted in his testimony, manifests that extreme indifference to the value of human life which differentiates reckless endangerment as a felony violation from reckless endangerment as a misdemeanor violation under the applicable statute. 26 Under the circumstances, the trial court did not err in refusing the requested instruction relating to involuntary manslaughter. Because of the statutory underpinning defining an assault in terms of reckless endangerment under North Dakota law, the opinion in Thompson is not controlling in this appeal. 27