Opinion ID: 2454115
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: order denying petition for writ of mandamus

Text: This original petition for a writ of mandamus challenges a district court's oral rulings denying partial summary judgment and denying reconsideration. Having considered the petition and appendix, we are not persuaded that this court's intervention by way of extraordinary relief is warranted at this time. NRAP 21(b)(1); Smith v. District Court, 107 Nev. 674, 818 P.2d 849 (1991). Petitioner is free to raise these issues in any appeal from the final judgment, following trial. NRS 34.170 (stating that writ relief is appropriate only when no plain, speedy, and adequate remedy exists); Pan v. Dist. Ct., 120 Nev. 222, 88 P.3d 840 (2004) (holding that an appeal is generally an adequate remedy precluding extraordinary relief). Accordingly, we. ORDER the petition DENIED. [1]