Opinion ID: 1178825
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: motion to recall mandate

Text: MOTION ALLOWED. LATOURETTE, J. On the third day of July, 1952, we rendered an opinion in the above entitled cause in which we affirmed the order of the lower court. No mention was made of costs and disbursements. Subsequently, respondents filed with the clerk of the court their cost bill against the appellants who objected to the same and petitioned the court for a ruling that costs and disbursements be awarded to all the parties against the estate of the deceased. Thereafter, we disallowed respondents' cost bill against the appellants but were of the opinion that appellants' petition to allow costs to all the parties against the decedent's estate should be allowed. Whereupon, a mandate was issued in conformity with such opinion. Thereafter, appellants tendered their cost bill and motion to recall the mandate so that the amount of their costs and disbursements could be inserted therein. Respondents objected on the ground that appellants had not filed their cost bill within 20 days from the time the original opinion was rendered, as required by ch. 23, Oregon Laws 1943. No official record was entered in the clerk's files of the court's opinion with reference to the allowance of costs and disbursements in favor of all parties against the estate of the decedent other than the mandate aforesaid. The appellants had no knowledge of the court's action excepting through the mandate. It is therefore ordered that our written opinion be amended by adding thereto the following: Costs and disbursements are hereby awarded to all the parties against the estate of Elise Rosenberg, deceased. The appellants are permitted to file the costs bill as tendered, the mandate will be recalled and the clerk directed to enter therein the amount of the costs and disbursements of appellants.