Opinion ID: 1278099
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Fuller's Kimbrough Claim

Text: Fuller contends that he should be re-sentenced in light of Kimbrough v. United States, ___ U.S. ____, 128 S.Ct. 558, 169 L.Ed.2d 481 (2007), which held that the cocaine guidelines are advisory only, and that a district court may consider the disparity in the Guidelines' treatment of crack and powder cocaine offenses in sentencing. Id. at 564, 570; United States v. Regalado, 518 F.3d 143, 146 (2d Cir.2008). The Government agrees with Fuller that the case should be remanded, so that the district court can determine whether to re-sentence Fuller. In light of the Government's concessions, we remand for reconsideration of his sentence.