Opinion ID: 2803541
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Wesley Black

Text: Wesley Black contends that Application #3 through Application #6 failed to demonstrate necessity. Essentially, he repeats the arguments made by the aforementioned Defendants. His claims thus lack merit. Black also asserts that the supporting affidavit for Application #3 contained materially false statements concerning the use of confidential sources, the futility of search warrants, and Darryl Colbert’s use of an alias. In his original suppression motion, however, Black raised only the claims made by Darryl and Dale Colbert. But neither Darryl nor Dale Colbert alleged the false statements Black identifies. Consequently, Black cannot advance these claims for the first time on appeal. See Lopez-Medina, 461 F.3d at 738. -18- Nos. 13-3803/3814/3883/4019/4081/4086, United States v. Darin Wright, et al.
Black argues that a Franks hearing was warranted for false statements regarding the use of confidential sources and the efficacy of obtaining a search warrant. Because Black never raised these arguments in his suppression motion, he cannot raise them on appeal. Id.