Opinion ID: 2809522
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: standard of review

Text: We review de novo a district court's dismissal of a complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction under Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. McCloskey v. Mueller, 446 F.3d 262, 266 (1st Cir. 2006). We also review de novo a district court's dismissal of a complaint for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Id. Plaintiffs will survive a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss only if their pleadings plausibly establish that they are entitled to relief. Vernet v. Serrano-Torres, 566 F.3d 254, 258 (1st Cir. 1 Plaintiffs expressly waived any argument regarding the district court's dismissal of all supplemental claims in their brief. -6- 2009). In undertaking this inquiry, we assume the truth of all well-pleaded facts and indulge all reasonable inferences that fit the plaintiff[s'] stated theory of liability. In re Colonial Mortg. Bankers Corp., 324 F.3d 12, 15 (1st Cir. 2003). Also, we may affirm on any basis apparent in the record. Lemelson v. U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n, 721 F.3d 18, 21 (1st Cir. 2013); see also Gabriel v. Preble, 396 F.3d 10, 12 (1st Cir. 2005).