Opinion ID: 2365532
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: Trial-practice issues.

Text: The Chalmers finally argue that the trial court erred in its dismissal of the appellants' claims subject to no bar of any statute of limitations. In this point, the Chalmers state that this space was intended to bring certain trial-practice issues before this Court, had space permitted. They present no legal arguments or authority, but merely cite as an example certain objections and conduct by appellees' counsel during the taking of a deposition. Failure to argue a point on appeal constitutes a waiver. Hazen v. City of Booneville, 260 Ark. 871, 545 S.W.2d 614 (1977); Brockwell v. State, 260 Ark. 807, 545 S.W.2d 60 (1976). Affirmed. Special Justice HENRY KINSLOW joins in this opinion.