Opinion ID: 1189782
Heading Depth: 5
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: The Arbitrator's Findings

Text: First, as we indicated above, the entire inquiry must proceed in light of the arbitrator's finding that there was no convincing information that any of the fired workers were undocumented. The arbitration came down to essentially the same question that the court must answer here: whether it could be said that the fired workers were undocumented. The arbitrator weighed the same evidence that the parties point to, and concluded that none of it constituted convincing information of immigration violations. While it is true that it is ultimately for the court to determine whether the arbitrator's award would violate public policy, Foster Poultry Farms, 74 F.3d at 174, his factual findings are not up for discussion, see, e.g., Misco, 484 U.S. at 45, 108 S.Ct. 364, and weigh strongly against Aramark's position. Put simply, it is difficult to conclude that Aramark had constructive notice  meaning positive information  of a fact when there was no convincing information of it. [6]