Opinion ID: 2780311
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Sentencing Judgment

Text: Appellant's second argument on appeal is that the trial court failed to exercise sufficient discretion when it sentenced Appellant to life in prison without parole in accordance with the jury's verdict. As with his first claim, this alleged error is also unpreserved. We once again decline to examine it now on appeal, as Appellant has failed to request palpable error review and brief the issue, and we do not find any extreme circumstances amounting to a substantial miscarriage of justice. Shepherd, 251 S.W.3d at 316. 7 ' III. CONCLUSION Because both of Appellant's allegations of error on appeal are unpreserved, and because Appellant failed to request palpable error review for either issue, we decline to undertake palpable error review. Thus, we affirm Appellant's convictions and sentence. All sitting. All concur. COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT: Daniel T. Goyette, Lousiville Metro Public Defender of Counsel James David Niehaus, Deputy Appellate Defender COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE: Jack Conway, Attorney General of Kentucky Jason Bradley Moore, Assistant Attorney General 8