Opinion ID: 1624645
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 9

Heading: whether neal is entitled to relief based on cumulative error.

Text: ¶ 55. Neal argues that errors occurred that, considered cumulatively, denied him the right to a fair and impartial trial. In cases in which this Court finds harmless error or error that is not reversible in and of itself, the Court has the discretion to determine on a case-by-case basis whether the errors, considered cumulatively, require reversal due to the resulting cumulative prejudicial effect. Byrom v. State, 863 So.2d 836, 847 (Miss. 2003). This case is not susceptible to cumulative-error analysis because we have determined that no errors occurred. Ruffin v. State, 992 So.2d 1165, 1179 (Miss. 2008). Therefore, this issue is without merit.