Opinion ID: 203405
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: Performance of Sánchez, a Claimed Comparison Employee

Text: Vélez also completed an undated 2004 mid-year evaluation for Eduardo Sánchez. We assume, in García's favor, it was in the same time period as plaintiff's evaluation. In this evaluation, Sánchez was rated as Meets Expectations in six categories and as Needs Improvement in one (Drives Performance). The accompanying text made one criticism, that Sánchez failed to consistently meet deadlines, commitments or objectives, although it also noted that Sánchez met other goals within the category of Drives Performance, such as staying focused on objectives when competing priorities arose. At some point after García's departure, BMS placed Sánchez on a PIP, a decision in which Vélez participated.