Opinion ID: 3066175
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: standard of review

Text: “A challenge to the constitutionality of a statute is reviewed de novo.” United States v. Berry, 683 F.3d 1015, 1020 (9th Cir. 2012) (citation omitted). “We also review de novo when a criminal statute is challenged for vagueness.” Id. (citation omitted). “We review a sentence for both procedural error and substantive reasonableness. . . .” United States v. Joseph, 716 F.3d 1273, 1276 (9th Cir. 2013) (citation omitted). “We review for clear error the district court’s finding that [Osinger] did not accept responsibility for his crime.” United States v. Ramos-Medina, 706 F.3d 932, 936 (9th Cir.), as amended, cert. denied, 134 S.Ct. 64 (2013) (citation omitted). UNITED STATES V. OSINGER 9