Opinion ID: 3063774
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: c umulative e rror

Text: Watley argues that the cumulative effective of the court’s evidentiary rulings deprived him of a fair trial. We will reverse a conviction if the cumulative effect of evidentiary errors was prejudicial, even if each individual error was harmless. United States v. Baker, 432 F.3d 1189, 1203 (11th Cir. 2005). “If there are no errors or a single error, there can be no cumulative error.” United States v. Waldon, 363 F.3d 1103, 1110 (11th Cir. 2004) (per curiam) (quotations omitted). Because the district court did not err by admitting evidence of prior controlled buys or by refusing to disclose the CI’s identity, we find no cumulative error here.