Opinion ID: 613696
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Conculsion

Text: Because we see no basis for distinguishing or departing from Ilchuk, we conclude that McKenzie has been convicted of an aggravated felony such that she is ineligible for 6 cancellation of removal.3 Therefore, we will deny the petition for review. 3 McKenzie also contends that she was “denied her right … to establish that the particular terms of her sentence were not sufficiently restrictive to constitute „imprisonment‟ ... .” (Pet. Br. at 13.) That assertion is unfounded. McKenzie had an opportunity to make her record – she submitted documentation concerning her sentence, an affidavit in which she described the very limited period that she was subject to monitoring, and documents concerning the organization of the Philadelphia Adult Probation and Parole Department, all of which were introduced into the administrative record. There is no indication that she was prohibited from introducing additional evidence to the extent she wanted to do so. 7