Opinion ID: 987956
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: The four statutes at issue are Wis. Stat.

Text: §§ 940.06(1), 948.03(3)(a), 948.03(3)(c), and 948.03(6). ¶¶38-46. C. The parents' challenge to the constitutionality of the statutes is that the statutes do not provide a definite enough standard of conduct and that one criminalizes the same conduct the other protects. ¶¶47-61. D. The statutes fulfill the due process fair notice constitutional requirement. ¶¶62-86. III. The Real Controversy Was Fully Tried. ¶¶87-147. 5 No. 2011AP1044-CR & 2011AP1105-CR A. The challenge to jury instructions on parent's duty to provide medical care. ¶¶93-121.
medical care to his or her child. ¶¶103- 111.
duty do not violate a parent's constitutional right to direct the care of his or her child. ¶¶112-117.
treatment through prayer, Wis. Stat. § 948.03(6), does not negate the legal duty to provide medical care in a second degree reckless homicide prosecution. ¶¶118-121. B. The challenge to jury instructions on religious belief. ¶¶122-127.