Opinion ID: 1428339
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: rice is precluded from raising the issue of equitable estoppel for the first time on appeal.

Text: [W]hen professional malpractice involves fraudulent or intentional concealment of the wrongdoing, even when the initial wrongdoing is merely negligent, the statute of limitations contained in I.C. § 5-219(4) is tolled until the injured party `knows or in the exercise of reasonable care should have been put on inquiry regarding the ... matter complained of.' McCoy v. Lyons, 120 Idaho 765, 772, 820 P.2d 360, 367 (1991). Rice did not allege fraudulent or intentional concealment in his malpractice complaint, nor did he raise the issue of equitable estoppel in his objection to Litster's motions for summary judgment or during oral argument before the district court. An issue presented for the first time on appeal will not be considered by this Court. Smith, 128 Idaho at 720, 918 P.2d at 589.