Opinion ID: 1490481
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: Trafficking in a Controlled Substance (Methamphetamine)

Text: With respect to the denial of the directed verdict on the trafficking count, KRS 218A.1412 says a person is guilty of First-Degree Trafficking in a Controlled Substance ....when he knowingly and unlawfully traffics in.... methamphetamine, including its salts, isomers, and salts of isomers; KRS 218A.1431(3) further defines Traffic specifically related to methamphetamine, as ....to distribute, dispense, sell, transfer, or possess with intent to distribute, dispense or sell methamphetamine. The Commonwealth presented evidence of the several small packages of finished methamphetamine product, empty baggies which could be used for packaging future product and what is known as a cutting agent. There was also evidence of a substantial amount of cash ($580.00) found in the residence at the time of the search. Deputy Poteet testified that, as a neighbor of Clemons, he noticed that the Clemons residence received many short-term visitors. As an officer, Deputy Poteet testified that this type of activity was associated with drug trafficking. Considering the testimony and the evidence on this issue, the trial court correctly determined that the Commonwealth had met its burden of proof as to KRS 218A.1412 and 218A.1431(3). Considering the evidence as a whole, as available to this trial court, we do not find it unreasonable for a jury to find guilt. The trial court did not err.