Opinion ID: 6345004
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: 2018 Custody Order

Text: In November 2017 Poole moved to enforce the court’s March 2015 order. He claimed that despite attempting to contact Rainer to set up visitation, Rainer had ignored his messages and calls since March 2015 and, as a result, he had seen his child only twice since the March 2015 court order. In addition to enforcement, Poole requested “full custody, due to proof that Laramie Rainer is using drugs,” and wanted Rainer to be drug tested and required to have supervised visitation. The court denied Poole’s motion without prejudice, noting Poole had not explained what “proof” he had of Rainer using drugs. In September 2018 Poole again moved to enforce the March 2015 order. He claimed that “multiple phone calls and text messages were sent to Laramie Rainer regarding visitation of our son” but that “only two visitation[]s were successful” since the order. He again requested full custody “due to the mother not possessing physical custody of their child due to drug addiction.” He stated that the child was living with Rainer’s parents full time and that Rainer’s parents were also unwilling to adhere to the custody order. In November Rainer and Poole reached a settlement agreement stating that they had “agreed to an updated progressive physical custody plan, similar to the one laid out in the 2015 order.” Poole’s custody would increase from one day a week to alternating weekend custody. He also had the option to exercise a weekly dinner with the child on Tuesday evenings. The parties submitted a proposed child custody modification order reflecting the agreement, which the court signed in December 2018. -3- 7597