Opinion ID: 42533
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: See id. at Ch. 5, pt. A.

Text: 3 This sentencing hearing took place after the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. Booker, 125 S. Ct. 738 (2005). Onofre-Blanco made arguments in the district court based on Booker, and the district court stated that it was applying the Guidelines in an advisory manner. Onofre-Blanco does not argue that there was any Booker error in this case. -3- erred in assessing two criminal history points under § 4A1.1(d) based upon the offense being committed while Onofre-Blanco was on supervised release. We conclude that there was no error.4 The relevant Guidelines provision states that two points should be added to a defendant’s criminal history score “if the defendant committed the instant offense while under any criminal justice sentence, including . . . supervised release. . . .” U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(d). The commentary to that Guideline section states that the section applies “if the defendant committed any part of the instant offense (i.e., any relevant conduct) while under any criminal justice sentence.” Id., cmt. n.4 (emphasis added). Our decisions state that the crime of being “found in” the United States in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 “commences when the alien enters the United States and is not completed until the defendant’s arrest.” United States v. Coeur, 196 F.3d 1344, 1346 (11th Cir. 1999); United States v. Castrillon-Gonzalez, 77 F.3d 403, 406 (11th Cir. 1996). In this case, it is undisputed that Onofre-Blanco’s supervised release expired 4 With respect to the Sentencing Guidelines, we review the district court’s findings of fact for clear error, and conclusions of law de novo. United States v. Crawford, 407 F.3d 1174, 1177-78 (11th Cir. 2005). In addition, even after the Supreme Court’s decision in Booker, this Court still must review the district court’s Guidelines calculations to determine if the district court properly considered the Guidelines as required under Booker. See id. at 1178. -4- on June 8, 2003, and that Onofre-Blanco entered the United States and began living here illegally in March of 2001. Thus, Onofre-Blanco’s crime “commenced” while he was on supervised release. Because U.S.S.G. § 4A1.1(d) applies if “any part” of the offense occurs while the defendant is on supervised release, the district court did not err in assessing the two criminal history points in issue. Accordingly, we affirm Onofre-Blanco’s 46-month sentence. AFFIRMED. -5-