Opinion ID: 2116756
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: propriety of awarding transcript costs

Text: The third issue raised by Husband is whether a referee may properly tax the cost of producing a hearing transcript on a party. The referee imposed the cost of the transcript on Husband. Husband argues the referee is without such authority based on the fact SDCL 15-17-5 authorizes courts to impose such costs, but does not specifically indicate referees. However, given the specific language set out in SDCL 15-6-53(a) (1992 Supp.), Husband's argument is without merit. That statute provides, in pertinent part: In cases involving an order for support as defined in subdivision (13) of § 25-71, any referee appointed to hear the case may recommend the imposition of attorney's fees and costs on one or both of the parties. (Emphasis added). The referee and the circuit court were acting within their authority in requiring Husband to pay transcript costs.