Opinion ID: 182759
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: Diaz's Evidence at the Sell Hearing

Text: After Dr. Sarrazin's testimony, Diaz's attorney informed the court that Diaz wished to comment on the testimony thus far. At that point, Diaz made a variety of comments, including that the administration of medication at the medical center was a war crime, that Dr. Pietz had lied about why Diaz was in a locked unit, and that Diaz was being unlawfully detained. Diaz contested the court's jurisdiction over him, complained about his attorney's assistance, and claimed he had additional witnesses who could speak on his behalf. After Diaz's comments, Diaz's attorney introduced five documents that Diaz wished to be part of the record: (1) a document handwritten by Diaz entitled Injunctive Suit Motion: Dialog in Truth, (2) a form Appeal of Involuntary Medical Decision issued by the medical center, attached to several handwritten pages, (3) a handwritten document entitled Statement as a[n] International Sovereign Diplomate [sic], attached to a BOP form entitled Request for Administrative Remedy, (4) a handwritten letter to the Atlanta Consulate / Consulate General, dated May 7, 2009, and (5) an Administrative Remedy System Informal Resolution Form issued by the medical center, attached to a handwritten document. Diaz presented no further evidence. [11]