Opinion ID: 1174739
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: Admission of Psychologist's Deposition

Text: Defendants contend the lower court erred by not admitting into evidence the contents of the deposition of an Arizona psychologist, Dr. Clinton Street. Nowhere in the record can we find an attempt by defendants to introduce Dr. Street's deposition, and it appears that only one reference was made to its contents. In cross-examining Richard Long, the former husband of defendant Mildred Lairby, defense counsel referred to the report of the psychologist. The prosecutor objected to any testimony about the report on the ground that the psychologist was not present, and the objection was sustained. In the absence of an attempt to introduce the deposition, we will not consider defendants' arguments under Utah R.Evid. 63(3), 9B U.C.A., 1953 (1977).