Opinion ID: 2617552
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: remand to determine twig's post-protest status and its nexus to the asserted claim is proper

Text: Today's remand to determine TWIG's standing as a Hohfeldian plaintiff  i.e., a person with a personal or proprietary interest at stake [19]  is necessary. Absent a contrary statutory definition, standing is tied to the concept of a Hohfeldian plaintiff. [20] Neither OCIWDA [21] nor OHWMA [22] discloses a legislative intent to extend beyond the protest period the non-Hohfeldian status authorized for the earlier stage of proceedings. TWIG I [23] answered in the negative the single question of whether TWIG had statutory standing. It did not address TWIG's standing as a Hohfeldian or common-law plaintiff in the post-protest permit-issuing process.