Opinion ID: 2332716
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Branwen's First Motion For Reconsideration.

Text: On February 23, 2009, Branwen filed a motion for reconsideration. The motion argued that the court ruled on the motion to modify custody before she had the opportunity to reply to Will's opposition. [2] Branwen filed a reply in support of her motion to modify custody at the same time. The court accepted Branwen's reply and gave Will a chance to file a response. On March 10, 2009, Will responded to Branwen's reply. The response argued that Will was complying with court orders, that custody should not be modified based on Branwen's own life choices, and that Branwen's reply assert[ed] no new issues or arguments in any particular. After considering the motion papers, the court again denied Branwen's motion for modification. The court found the affidavits of [Will] credible, the arguments of [Will's] Counsel persuasive and no significant change in circumstances warranting modification of the present custody order in the best interest of the child. The court confirmed its prior order awarding attorney's fees to Will and directed Will's counsel to submit an accounting of fees and costs to Branwen and the court.