Opinion ID: 2515943
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Did Judge Savell err in his remedies ruling?

Text: Finally, Sprucewood argues that Judge Savell abused his discretion by rejecting Sprucewood's Rule 60(b) motion and permitting AHFC to sell the Spruce Park buildings at a competitive auction instead of requiring AHFC to demolish them as originally planned. But Sprucewood offers no legal support for its argument, asserting only that Judge Savell's ruling was unjust. Absent adequate argument, Sprucewood's claim is waived. [25] Sprucewood has separately argued, moreover, that AHFC's demolition of the buildings would have been wasteful and a violation of AHFC's statutory obligations to provide housing for Alaskans. But if it would have been wasteful and a violation of AHFC's statutory obligations for AHFC to demolish the buildings, then it cannot have been an abuse of discretion to permit AHFC to sell them instead.