Opinion ID: 175568
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: order and amended opinion

Text: The opinion filed in this matter by this court on May 26, 2010, 606 F.3d 658, is amended as follows: At 606 F.3d at 661, right column, first full paragraph: The final sentence of this paragraph (beginning We affirm . . .) is amended to state: We affirm the dismissal of the fraud and unfair competition claims and the dismissal of the claims for declaratory relief with regard to those claims, but we reverse the dismissal of the breach of contract claim and the claim for declaratory relief with regard to that claim. At 606 F.3d at 667, the body of Section III, entitled Declaratory Relief is amended to state: The district court's dismissal of the claims for declaratory relief appears to have depended upon its ruling dismissing all claims for substantive relief. Because we affirm the district court's dismissal of the fraud and unfair competition claims, we affirm the dismissal of the claims for declaratory relief on those claims. Because we reverse the district court's dismissal of the breach of contract claim, we also reverse the denial of declaratory relief with regard to that claim. At 606 F.3d at 667, the first sentence of Section IV, entitled Conclusion, is amended to state: For the reasons above stated, we affirm the dismissal of Shroyer's common law fraud and unfair competition claims and the denial of declaratory relief with regard to those claims, and we reverse the dismissal of Shroyer's breach of contract claim and denial of declaratory relief with regard to that claim. There are no pending petitions for panel or en banc rehearing. No subsequent petitions for panel or en banc rehearing may be filed. The mandate shall issue in due course. The amended opinion is filed contemporaneously with this order.