Opinion ID: 1649129
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 8

Heading: Court of Appeals' Determination

Text: The Court of Appeals affirmed the termination order based on Clark's testimony. It noted that Clark testified Shawna failed to demonstrate she would seek only necessary medical care for Shelby, failed to follow the safety plan, failed to report Shelby's doctor appointments 25 percent of the time, and reported symptoms to Clark that were inconsistent with what she had reported to the medical care provider. The court quoted Clark as stating: `When Shelby's been with Shawna, [Shelby] appears to be quite ill. When Shelby is not with Shawna, [Shelby] is very healthy, and I think that is the concern.' In re Interest of Shelby L. II, 2004 WL 2935857 at .