Opinion ID: 2630405
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: Issue 2: The trial court's discretion in denying the motion.

Text: Puls additionally argues that the court abused its discretion in denying her motion to participate in the trial by telephone. This argument is also based upon the court's alleged failure to appropriately apply the ADA. State v. Gary, 282 Kan. 232, Syl. ¶ 1, 144 P.3d 634 (2006) (a trial court by definition abuses its discretion when it makes an error of law). We need not address this argument, given our holding that Puls has failed to demonstrate she is protected by the ADA. We have considered other arguments of Puls and find they have no merit. Affirmed. DAVIS and JOHNSON, JJ., not participating. LARSON, S.J., and GREENE, J., assigned.