Opinion ID: 575280
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: conclusion

Text: 27 The record reveals that the ALJ failed to produce substantial evidence discrediting Miller's subjective allegations of disabling pain. Miller consistently complained to her doctors that she suffered pain in her back and neck. Miller's doctors did not locate a specific cause of Miller's pain. However, Miller's personal physician believed Miller's discomfort strong enough to prescribe a potent pain-killing medication. As we noted in Polaski, direct medical evidence of the cause and effect relationship between the impairment and the degree of claimant's subjective complaints need not be produced. 739 F.2d at 1322. We hold that no substantial evidence in the record effectively refutes the credibility of Miller's subjective complaints of pain. 28 The vocational experts who testified at both hearings agreed that if Miller's claims of disabling pain are true, then Miller cannot work for any employer in this economy. 2 Thus, no issue exists as to Miller's disabling condition. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the district court with directions to remand it to the Secretary for an award of benefits in the appropriate amount.