Opinion ID: 166321
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Search-related claims

Text: 21 Next, Price argues before this court that even his search-related claims accrued after June 14, 2000, because (a) Price fled the scene and was unaware of the extent of the violations resulting from the unlawful search until after that date; and (b) the search itself was not completed for several days. 22 We disagree. The law requires only that the claimant knows or has reason to know of the injury before the limitations period begins to run. Baker, 991 F.2d at 632. Indeed, the claimant need not even know all of the evidence before the cause of action accrues. Id. 23 Price may not have known the full extent of his property-related injuries on June 14, 2000, when the search was initiated; however, in his complaint, he acknowledges that he was present when Defendants arrived and allegedly began shooting. Even if Price's own flight may have prevented him from immediately surveying the extent of his property loss, and even if we assume the search did occur over several days, Price certainly had reason to know that the events giving rise to this action were occurring as early as June 14, 2000. Therefore, we agree with the district court's conclusion that June 14, 2000, is the applicable accrual date for Price's search-related claims.