Opinion ID: 2967751
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: the evidence was insufficient to support their

Text: convictions for money laundering conspiracy; and (3) with respect to Ms. Bolden, that the evidence was insufficient to sustain her convictions on the eighteen separate false claims charges. The Boldens also raise assertions of error with regard to their sentences (the Sentencing Issues), specifically maintaining that: (1) the court erred in grouping their fraud and money laundering convictions; (2) the court failed to make adequate factual findings on the sentencing issues in dispute; and (3) to the extent the court’s factual findings were adequate, they were clearly erroneous.4 4 If the sentencing court’s factual findings are adequate, the Boldens assert that the court clearly erred by (a) improperly calculating fraud UNITED STATES v. BOLDEN 5 Before turning to their contentions, we review the factual underpinnings for the Boldens’ convictions and sentences.5