Opinion ID: 1745175
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 9

Heading: the trial court erred in failing to grant appellant's motion for a new trial.

Text: We have carefully considered the facts contained in the record of this case, and, accepting those facts favorable to the State as true, conclude that there was an issue for the jury to determine as to the guilt of the appellant. The jury resolved that issue against the appellant and we are unable to say that the verdict was not supported by the evidence. Bunkley v. State, 495 So.2d 1 (Miss. 1986); Carter v. State, 493 So.2d 327 (Miss. 1986); Griffin v. State, 480 So.2d 1124 (Miss. 1985); Johnson v. State, 476 So.2d 1195 (Miss. 1985); Burge v. State, 472 So.2d 392, 396 (Miss. 1985); Hammond v. State, 465 So.2d 1031 (Miss. 1985); Weeks v. State, 465 So.2d 334 (Miss. 1985); Warn v. State, 349 So.2d 1055 (Miss. 1977). There being no reversible error in the trial below, the judgment must be affirmed. AFFIRMED. HAWKINS, P.J., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON, GRIFFIN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur. HAWKINS, P.J., files a separate specially concurring opinion joined in part by DAN M. LEE, P.J., and ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN, ANDERSON, GRIFFIN and ZUCCARO, JJ. DAN M. LEE, P.J., and PRATHER, ROBERTSON, SULLIVAN and ZUCCARO, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part by separate opinion.