Opinion ID: 2982150
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Unlawful Entry and Arrest - Officer Keller

Text: “[W]e are required by the limitations on interlocutory appeals of qualified immunity denials to accept the district court’s finding that a genuine dispute of material fact existed.” Romo v. Largen, 723 F.3d 670, 674 (6th Cir. 2013). We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s denial of qualified immunity to Officer Keller on the unlawful entry and arrest claim because he does not concede Saad’s factual account on appeal and that account is not contradicted by the record. Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 380 (2007) (“[w]hen opposing parties tell two different stories, one of which is blatantly contradicted by the record, so that no reasonable jury could believe it, a court should not adopt that version of the facts for purposes of ruling on a motion for summary -10- No. 12-1894 Saad v. Keller judgment”); Romo, 723 F.3d at 674 n.3.