Opinion ID: 3155415
Heading Depth: 4
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: the scope and history of the litigation;

Text: (2) the ability of the opposing party to satisfy an award of fees; (3) whether an award of fees against the opposing party would deter others from acting in similar circumstances; (4) the merits of the respective positions – including the degree of the opposing party’s culpability or bad faith; (5) whether the claim brought was not in subjective bad faith but frivolous, unreasonable, groundless; (6) whether the defense raised a defense mainly to frustrate or stall; (7) whether the claim brought was to resolve a significant legal question under FDUTPA law. Humane Soc’y of Broward Cty., Inc. v. Fla. Humane Soc’y, 951 So. 2d 966, 97172 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007) (citing Rosen v. Rosen, 696 So. 2d 697, 700-01 (Fla. 1997)). This list is nonexhaustive. Id. at 971.