Opinion ID: 1807977
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Motions for removal of Director Wernz and his assistant from this case

Text: In addition to his motion for permission to order a transcript, Graham moved for the removal of Director Wernz and his assistant from this matter and for the removal of Director Wernz from office. The issue of whether Wernz should be removed from Graham's disciplinary hearing was considered at the disciplinary hearing itself. Finding 50 found no grounds for removal. We have reviewed the record and concur. Moreover, under the review standard of Rule 14(e), that finding is conclusive. Consequently, we deny his motion. The motion to remove Wernz's senior assistant is summarily denied. Graham himself states in his motion: I do not believe [Wernz's] assistant has done anything questionable   . That being the case, no reason appears to remove her.