Opinion ID: 1868710
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: instruction p-29(a) also misstates the facts.

Text: Dixie argues that instruction P-209(a) infers that Dixie wrongfully canceled the Mooneyhans' policy when cancellation was not at issue. When P-29(a) was first submitted, Dixie objected on these grounds. However, the trial court offered to amend the instruction and resubmit it. When the instruction was resubmitted after modification, Dixie stated it had no objection to it being offered. Thus, Dixie waived its right to challenge the instruction on appeal. Arledge v. McFatter, 605 So.2d 781, 787 (Miss. 1992); Young v. Robinson, 538 So.2d 781, 783 (Miss. 1989); Shell Oil Co. v. Murrah, 493 So.2d 1274, 1276 (Miss. 1986).