Opinion ID: 2225425
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: certificated employee

Text: We have already concluded in South Sioux City Ed. Assn. v. Dakota Cty. Sch. Dist . that Manning was a probationary certificated employee. [9] None of the arguments presented by the school district in this appeal dissuade us from that conclusion. As a probationary certificated employee, Manning was entitled by statute to an employment contract, certain benefits under the collective bargaining agreement, and notice and hearing before termination. [10] The school district's assignments of error relating to the district court's reinstatement of Manning's employment, with a contract, and the award of backpay and benefits, are all premised on its continuing argument that Manning was not a probationary certificated employee. Having concluded otherwise, we find no merit to those assignments of error.