Opinion ID: 1706389
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: Osmer presents four issues on appeal: (1) Whether the trial court erred in holding that there was no evidence that Belshe had built and sold a defective product that killed Ricky Osmer and, therefore, that the plaintiff had no cause of action under the AEMLD. (2) Whether the trial court erred in holding that the trailer was a general purpose product and that, under prior holdings of this Court, Belshe was therefore not liable; (3) Whether the trial court erred in holding that Belshe was not liable to Osmer because of a lack of causal relationship between the manufacture of the trailer and the death of Ricky Osmer; and (4) Whether the trial court erred in holding that Ricky Osmer was contributorily negligent as a matter of law, and that Belshe was therefore not liable.