Opinion ID: 858518
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: pending issues on remand

Text: Lazare Kaplan requests this court to enter judgment on the issue of infringement. We cannot do so. See Golden Bridge Tech., Inc. v. Nokia, Inc., 527 F.3d 1318, 1323 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (“Appellate courts review district court judgments; we do not find facts.”). In Lazare Kaplan III, we instructed the district court to assess infringement on remand because “we cannot determine with any certainty that the accused machines infringe the asserted claims under this new construction.” Lazare Kaplan III, 628 F.3d at 1370. On remand, the district court made no findings of fact as to infringement under the revised construction and instead dismissed Lazare Kaplan’s motion for summary judgment of infringement as moot. Lazare Kaplan IV, 2012 WL 505742, at . On this LAZARE KAPLAN INT’L, INC. v. PHOTOSCRIBE TECHS., INC. 15 second remand, we again instruct the district court to assess infringement under the construction we set forth in Lazare Kaplan III.