Opinion ID: 2258942
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 10

Heading: The September 2, 1992 Article

Text: In light of the foregoing analysis, we agree with the trial judge that the September 2, 1992 article may not be found to be libelous and it should not be submitted to the jury. [44] Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Superior Court dismissing Civil Action No. 94C-09-19-SCD, 1995 WL 716938 filed on September 2, 1994. We express no opinion, however, on the admissibility in evidence of that article or the surrounding circumstances in the trial relating to the July 5, 1992 article. That issue will have to be determined by the trial judge, depending on the purpose for which the article is offered and the circumstances at trial.