Opinion ID: 3043083
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: issues

Text: The first issue on appeal is whether the bankruptcy court erred in sustaining the Creditor’s objection to the Debtor’s homestead exemptions in certain real property which the Debtor transferred pre- petition. We conclude that the bankruptcy court did not err in sustaining the objection to the Debtor’s homestead exemptions in the real property. The second issue on appeal is whether the Debtor’s constitutional rights were violated by the bankruptcy court’s failure to appoint counsel to represent the Debtor in connection with his bankruptcy case. We conclude that the Debtor had no right to counsel in connection with his bankruptcy case. In his briefs, the Debtor alleges that the Creditor violated the automatic stay. No allegations regarding this matter were raised in connection with the order which 1 The Honorable James G. Mixon, United States Bankruptcy Judge for the Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas. 2 is the subject of this appeal. Consequently such matter is not properly before this tribunal. Alexander v. Jensen-Carter (In re Alexander), 236 F.3d 431, 433 (8th Cir. 2001).2