Opinion ID: 186817
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: The Issues on Review

Text: 21 The Authority's determination that the employer did not fail[ ] to provide the employees access to a drug treatment and rehabilitation program as required by § 12 of the Local Drug Agreement is supported by substantial evidence and it is not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law. We therefore deny the petition for review insofar as it challenges this decision. 22 Davis-Monthan AFB argued before the Authority that the [disputed contract] provisions as [interpreted by the ALJ] are unenforceable because they are contrary to management's right to discipline under [the Statute]. Davis-Monthan AFB, 60 F.L.R.A. No. 166, slip op. at 10. The Authority did not address this contention below, and it has not raised the argument in its briefs to this court. Therefore, this question is not before the court on review. The principal issue here is whether the Authority erred in its construction of § 9 of the Local Drug Agreement and Article 27 of the CBA.