Opinion ID: 202292
Heading Depth: 3
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Admission of Besore's prior conviction

Text: 32 During the cross-examination of Thibodeau, the defense, on two occasions, asked him about his relationship with Besore. On the first occasion, Thibodeau testified that he had worked with Besore on several occasions, that Besore was reliable, and that Besore was a trustworthy individual. When Thibodeau was asked if he was aware if Besore had a criminal record, he answered in the affirmative. 3 The following exchange then took place: 33 Defense: Okay. Were you aware that he was convicted of — 34 Prosecutor: Objection. This is Rule 609 information, and it's for cross-examination of the witness [i.e., Besore]. 35