Opinion ID: 626380
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: Post-Submission Motion

Text: After the case was submitted to the Court, Morrow filed a motion to supplement the record on March 8, 2012, pursuant to Fed. R App. P. 10(e)(2)(C). Morrow seeks permission to add trial transcripts from a state-court proceeding that, he asserts, demonstrate that a police officer who testified at Morrow’s trial lied about the circumstances leading to Morrow’s arrest. 3 The state trial, however, took place after the federal trial on which this appeal is based. Because the proposed new materials could not have been part of the district court record in any event, see Fed. R. App. P. 10(e)(2), we deny the motion. We have considered Morrow’s other arguments on appeal and have found them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED. FOR THE COURT: Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk 4