Opinion ID: 1101247
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: Whether the trial court committed reversible error by incorrectly explaining to the appellant his right of elocution?

Text: J. Whether the trial court erred in submitting to the jury the aggravating circumstance instruction that the appellant knowingly created a great risk to many persons? K. Whether the trial court erred in refusing appellant's proposed Instruction D-3? L. Whether the trial court erred in refusing appellant's proposed Instruction D-8? M. Whether the trial court erred in refusing appellant's proposed Instruction D-11? N. Whether the trial court erred in refusing appellant's proposed Instruction D-12? O. Whether the trial court erred in refusing appellant's proposed Instruction D-13? P. Whether the prosecution in this case engaged in misconduct that requires reversal? Q. Whether the trial court erred in refusing to investigate alleged jury improprieties and in relying on the Attorney General's office to determine procedure? R. Whether the trial court erred in failing to declare the death penalty statute unconstitutional and disproportionately applied? ¶ 10. As stated earlier, Issue B is dispositive of this case, and only Issues B, J, and Q will be addressed.