Opinion ID: 2805465
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: conclusion

Text: For the foregoing reasons, we vacate the ICA’s October 28, 2013 Judgment on Appeal, affirm the circuit court’s 5 By contrast, parties may limit consequential damages in appropriate situations. See, e.g., HRS § 490:2-712 (2008). 29  FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST’S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER  August 28, 2012 order denying Respondents’ motion to compel arbitration, and remand to the circuit court for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Terence J. O’Toole, /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald Judith Ann Pavey, and Andrew J. Lautenbach /s/ Paula A. Nakayama for petitioners /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna Bert T. Kobayashi, Jr., Lex R. Smith, Joseph A. /s/ Richard W. Pollack Stewart and Maria Y. Wang for respondents The Ritz- /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Carlton Development Company, Inc., The Ritz-Carlton Management Company, LLC, John Albert and Edgar Gum and respondents Marriott International, Inc., The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, LLC, Marriott Two Flags, LP, Marriott Ownership Resorts, Inc., MH Kapalua Venture, LLC, and Marriott Vacations Worldwide Corporation 30