Opinion ID: 2068198
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: whether the trial court abused its discretion in its identification and division of the marital assets.

Text: A trial court's findings will not be set aside unless they are clearly erroneous. Tate v. Tate, 394 N.W.2d 309, 310 (S.D.1986). This court will not disturb a division of property unless it clearly appears the trial court abused its discretion. Kanta v. Kanta, 479 N.W.2d 505, 507 (S.D. 1991); Johnson v. Johnson, 471 N.W.2d 156, 159 (S.D.1991); Fox v. Fox, 467 N.W.2d 762, 766 (S.D.1991).