Opinion ID: 164968
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: introduction

Text: 1 The City of Santa Fe, a political subdivision of the State of New Mexico, adopted an ordinance (the Ordinance) which established new procedures for telecommunications providers seeking access to city-owned rights-of-way. Qwest Corporation (Qwest) provides telecommunications services in Santa Fe and utilizes the rights-of-way. Qwest brought suit in federal district court seeking a declaration that the Ordinance is preempted by state and federal law, an injunction to prevent the enforcement of the Ordinance, and attorney's fees. Qwest argued that the Federal Telecommunications Act of 1996, 47 U.S.C. § 253 (TCA), and state law preempted the Ordinance. Further, Qwest argued that it was entitled to attorney's fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 if it prevails. 2 The district court concluded several sections of the Ordinance were preempted by § 253, but ruled that an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 was not available and, therefore, Qwest could not seek attorney's fees under § 1988. Qwest appeals, and the City cross-appeals. This court exercises jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and agrees with the district court's articulate decision in substantially all respects. This court, nevertheless, reverses in part.