Opinion ID: 2093394
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: the injunction against longo

Text: Normally this court would remand for articulation where, as in this case, the factual basis of the trial court's decision to order a prohibitive injunction against the defendant Longo is unclear from the memorandum of decision. Practice Book § 3096. Here, however, the defendant Longo was also subject to the mandatory injunctions issued against the zoning and conservation commissions by virtue of his status as ex officio member of both commissions. The further negative injunction restraining Longo from interfering with the public hearings ordered places no additional burden upon him. Any technical error in issuing the prohibitive injunction without factual basis would, therefore, be harmless. Harrison v. Union & New Haven Trust Co., 147 Conn. 435, 440, 162 A.2d 182 (1960). There is no error.