Opinion ID: 4529973
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: the district court should determine

Text: THE PROPER SCOPE OF THE SENTENCE MODIFICATION Cunningham also argues that the portion of the sentence modification that bars him from unsupervised contact with any minors denies him the ability to see his minor son. Because of the “severe intrusion on . . . family life” that results from that possibility, we seek a “clear[] sign” from the District Court that it considered the issue. United States v. Loy, 237 F.3d 251, 270 (3d Cir. 2001). As the record here is unclear, a point all but conceded by the Government,3 we will remand this portion of the sentence modification so the District Court may engage in fact-finding and determine the proper scope of its order. 3 (See Response Br. at 38–39.) 5