Opinion ID: 2820866
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: standard of review

Text: ¶10 This appeal stems from a grant of summary judgment, which calls for de novo review. Carmichael v. Beller , 1996 OK 48, ¶ 2, 914 P.2d 1051, 1053. Under the de novo standard, this Court is afforded plenary, independent, and non-deferential authority to examine the issues presented. Harmon v. Cradduck , 2012 OK 80, ¶ 10, 286 P.3d 643, 648. When examining an order sustaining summary judgment, this Court must determine whether the record reveals disputed material facts. Sheffer v. Carolina Forge Co., L.L.C. , 2013 OK 48, ¶ 11, 306 P.3d 544, 548. Even when basic facts are undisputed, motions for summary judgment should be denied, if from the evidence, reasonable persons might reach different inferences or conclusions. Id. All facts and inferences must be viewed in a light most favorable to the party opposing summary adjudication. Id.