Opinion ID: 1143719
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 6

Heading: carmen's redemption rights

Text: Carmen asserts she has redemption rights in the real property sold at execution. The statute applicable to this issue says: 11-401. Redemption  Persons entitled to make.  Property sold subject to redemption, as provided in section 11-310, or any part sold separately, may be redeemed in the manner hereinafter provided, by the following persons, or their successors in interest: ... . 2. A creditor having a lien by judgment or mortgage on the property sold, or some share or part thereof, subsequent to that on which the property was sold. The persons mentioned in the second subdivision of this section are, in this chapter, termed redemptioners. Carmen argues the partition order's distinction between the $100,000 initial payment and the amount of $273,739.40 to be paid over twenty years and secured by a note and mortgage constituted two separate judgments. She asserts the award of the $273,739.40 was a judgment subsequent to the award of $100,000. The partition order identifies the $100,000 as a down payment and the $273,739.40 as the balance. These terms are generally used to identify different parts of a single judgment, not to identify two judgments. Furthermore, the proceedings below consistently refer to Carmen's interest as a lien or the money judgment. Therefore Carmen had only one lien, the one which she executed. She had no liens separate from or subsequent to the liens she executed upon. She is therefore not a redemptioner under I.C. § 11-401(2). Affirmed. Costs to respondents. No attorney fees awarded. DONALDSON, C.J., and SHEPARD, BAKES and BISTLINE, JJ., concur.