Opinion ID: 2779092
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: issues

Text: 1. Is the MWL unconstitutional as applied to Cornelius? 2. Did the PCHB err by allowing Ecology to use a streamlined process for evaluating WSU's application? 3. Does RCW 90.44.100 authorize WSU to amend its certificates and add well locations? 4. Did the PCHB correctly apply SEPA? 5. Did the PCHB' s summary judgment order improperly preclude Cornelius from presenting evidence about impairment and the public welfare? 6. Did RCW 90.44.130 require Ecology to determine ifWSU's proposal would maintain a safe sustaining yield of groundwater? 7. Did WSU exercise reasonable diligence in putting its water rights to beneficial use? 8. Did WSU abandon Claim No. 98523? 9. Did the PCHB err in granting WSU' s summary judgment motion regarding beneficial use and reasonable efficiency? 4 Cornelius v. Dep 't of Ecology No. 88317-3 10. Did the water quantities authorized under Permit No. G3-28278P need to be reduced? 11. Is Cornelius entitled to attorney fees?