Opinion ID: 1821211
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Affidavit of Pat Lamb

Text: That he had been an employee of L.H. Lull during 1953; that the structure on the premises was then a bare cement block building; that during 1953 Lull had erected a frame garage thereon which originally had not been attached to the cement block building; that during 1954 Lull built a further frame addition to the premises which was attached to the cement building so that by the first of 1955 the buildings erected by Lull were attached to the building he had originally rented; That before the frame buildings were built affiant had carried out negotiations with Rueger and Bolkcom and secured their approval for such work; That it was then agreed by all parties that in the event the    premises was sold, the proceeds of the sale would be divided proportionately between Mr. Rueger and Mr. Bolkcom, as the owners of the original building, and Mr. Lull, as the owner of the attachments placed thereon, and that said division would be made proportionate to the value of each party's respective interest; That the provision for removal of the frame structures was inserted in a subsequent lease at the request of Rueger and Bolkcom because they did not want to be in a position of being forced to buy the buildings and attachments at its reasonable value; that in addition the possibility was also discussed that the property with the attachments and equipment might be rented out to a third party; that it was further agreed that the lease could be renewed from time to time upon the same terms and conditions as contained in the original lease with the exception only that Mr. Lull would pay the increased amount of the real estate tax caused by the erection of the structure described; and that the only reason the lease was not renewed for 1957 was because in 1956 the state had served notice that the property was being condemned, making it imperative that Lull find a new site for his business.