Opinion ID: 2190248
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: did the trial court err in denying defendant's motion for reconsideration of the sentence without a hearing?

Text: As stated above, this issue has not been briefed and is therefore waived. Pa.R.App.P. 2116(a) (This rule is to be considered in the highest degree mandatory, admitting of no exception; ordinarily no point will be considered which is not set forth in the statement of questions involved or suggested thereby.); Rago v. Nace, 313 Pa.Super. 575, 460 A.2d 337 (1983). See also, Commonwealth v. Stufflet, 322 Pa.Super. 176, 469 A.2d 240 (1983); Commonwealth v. Sanford, 299 Pa.Super. 64, 445 A.2d 149 (1982). Conversely, the claim briefed by appellant and addressed by the majority is similarly not before us as it was not set forth in the statement of questions involved or suggested thereby. Rule 2116(a), supra. Because of the foregoing, my agreement with the majority to affirm the judgment of sentence is limited to the majority's correct disposition of the first and only issue properly before us.