Opinion ID: 463585
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 4

Heading: The Board's Stated Basis for the Decision

Text: 15 Bonanno's final argument is that the Board made a quantum leap from a set of facts to a legal conclusion, without adequate explanation of the basis for its conclusion, when it found that because the economic strike was converted into an unfair labor practice strike on May 3 Bonanno committed a separate unfair labor practice when it refused to reinstate any of the twelve strikers who requested reinstatement in February and March 1977. The Board's statement that its conclusion was based on settled law is inadequate, argues Bonanno, because the Board departed from settled law. The Board explained that it was applying settled law, and after reviewing the cases cited by the Board, Covington Furniture Mfg. Corp., 212 N.L.R.B. 214 (1974), enforced, 514 F.2d 995 (6th Cir.1975), and Gulf Envelope Co., 256 N.L.R.B. 320 (1981), and the other cases cited in this opinion, we agree. Order Enforced.