Opinion ID: 535680
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 3

Heading: ALJ's Use of the Grids

Text: 23 We next consider Bates' contention that the ALJ's use of the grids to deny benefits was error because he suffers from both exertional and nonexertional limitations. 24 The use of the grids to find a claimant not disabled can be appropriate when both exertional and nonexertional limitations are alleged. See 20 (C.F.R. pt. 404, subpt. P., App. 2) Sec. 200.00(e) (1988). In such a case the grids may be used to find a claimant not disabled when the ALJ finds that the claimant's nonexertional limitations do not significantly affect his exertional capabilities. Razey v. Heckler, 785 F.2d 1426, 1430 (9th Cir.1986), modified, 794 F.2d 1348 (1986). On the other hand, where a claimant's nonexertional limitations do significantly limit his range of work, then use of the grids to find him not disabled is inappropriate. Polny v. Bowen, 864 F.2d 661, 663-64 (9th Cir.1988). 25 In his decision the ALJ made findings that Bates retained the capacity to do light work and that his nonexertional limitations would cause no significant vocational limitations. These findings were supported by substantial evidence including reports from Bates' treating physician, chiropractor and psychologist. Use of the grids to make a finding of not disabled was appropriate under these circumstances.