Opinion ID: 169326
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: pla in tiff’s issues on appeal

Text: Plaintiff lists two “issues” on appeal, but argues four “points.” Because her points overlap her stated issues, we analyze the case according to her two issues: (1) Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-40 extends the statute of limitations because her first suit was dismissed for procedural reasons; and (2) Utah Code Ann. § 78-12-35 -4- tolls the statute of limitations because Larson moved away from Utah shortly after the shooting and there was no agent to accept service on his behalf after he left the state. Plaintiff’s third “point” is that Larson did not respond to her motion to alter or amend and therefore acquiesced in her arguments. She never raised this argument in the district court, however, and, considering it as a third issue, it is deemed waived. See Singleton v. W ulff, 428 U.S. 106, 120 (1976). As to her remaining issues, we review the grant of summary judgment de novo. Boyer v. Cordant Techs., Inc., 316 F.3d 1137, 1138 (10th Cir. 2003).