Opinion ID: 3012189
Heading Depth: 2
Heading Rank: 2

Heading: Claims against Allegheny Township.

Text: Ms. Pulice also appeals the District Court’s grant of summary judgment on her claims against Allegheny Township. She claims that the Township should be held liable for the defendant Officers’ actions taken pursuant to the Township’s policies. In light of our conclusion that the defendant Officers did not violate a constitutional right, however, we will affirm the District Court’s dismissal of claims against the Township. C. Conspiracy claims against Trooper King and Peoples Gas Company. Finally, Ms. Pulice appeals based on her claims that both Trooper King and the Peoples’ Gas Company conspired with the defendant Officers to violate her constitutional rights. We agree with the District Court that Ms. Pulice failed to produce sufficient evidence of an agreement to overcome summary judgment on her conspiracy claims. We therefore affirm the District Court’s dismissal of these claims.