Opinion ID: 1673753
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 7

Heading: Sufficiency of evidence as to Waterbury.

Text: Waterbury contends there was insufficient evidence to support his conviction. On review, we consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the State. State v. Gibb, 303 N.W.2d 673, 685 (Iowa 1981). We first note Waterbury's detailed confession was unchallenged and came in without objection. It was corroborated by Joslyn's testimony and by the testimony of Brenda Culp, from whom he purchased the gun. There was further evidence the gun was the murder weapon, he had purchased the ammunition for it, and the gun and the remaining shells were found in his possession. We have considered other contentions advanced by Waterbury and find them to be without substance.