Opinion ID: 895236
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 10

Heading: Strachan's Remaining Points

Text: Strachan further contends the court of appeals erred in reversing the trial court's summary judgment in her favor because (1) Page's summary judgment response did not preserve error as to Strachan, (2) Page's appellate brief did not properly assign error as to her, and (3) Page's general point of error is insufficiently specific to preserve her argument that the trial court erred in granting Strachan summary judgment. In rejecting these arguments, the court of appeals concluded that Page had sufficiently challenged the trial court's summary judgment in Strachan's favor in both her summary judgment response and her appellate briefing. 259 S.W.3d at 271-72. We agree with the court of appeals and reject Strachan's remaining points.