Opinion ID: 1694546
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: Irons

Text: Meeks makes no argument that Keystone made her working situation so intolerable that she was forced to leave. Rather, the record shows that Meeks had failed to adequately do the job to which she was assigned and that when she was going to be given another job she voluntarily left her employment. Additionally, nothing in the record indicates that any of the warnings given to Meeks were meritless and were given solely to induce her to leave. Therefore, Meeks failed to show that she was terminated in retaliation for seeking workers' compensation benefits. The trial court erred in denying Keystone's motion for a JNOV. The judgment for Meeks is reversed and a judgment is rendered for Keystone. REVERSED AND JUDGMENT RENDERED. HORNSBY, C.J., and MADDOX, SHORES, KENNEDY, and COOK, JJ., concur.