Opinion ID: 67025
Heading Depth: 1
Heading Rank: 1

Heading: e vidence

Text: As an initial matter, Summers cites evidence that the magistrate found to be inadmissible. Because he did not object to the magistrate’s rulings on this evidence before the district court, he cannot challenge it on appeal. See Maynard v. Bd. of Regents, 342 F.3d 1281, 1286 (11th Cir. 2003). He also cites evidence that was not in the record before the district court, which we may not consider. See Chapman v. AI Transp., 229 F.3d 1012, 1026 (11th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The district court did not err by not considering the various affidavits and articles.