PATENT CLAIM ANALYSIS

Application Number: 16100760
Application Type: Utility
Filing Date: 2018-08
Publication Date: 2019-01
Patent Classification: ["709", "226000"]

Abstract:
Implementing a fair share of resources among one or more scheduling peers. Resource allocations are received for a plurality of scheduling peers. For each scheduling peer, a usage percentage difference is determined between their respective usage percentage and configured share ratio. For a first competing peer that is served more than a second competing peer, resource allocation is adjusted such that resources from the first competing peer are allocated to the second competing peer based, at least in part, on a time decay factor function that gives less weight to the usage percentage difference as an age of the usage percentage difference increases.

Claim (Index 12):
The computer program product of  claim 11 , the program instructions further comprising:\n program instructions to determine a greatest fairness difference between a usage percentage difference of a most-served competing peer and a usage percentage difference of a least-served competing peer included in a pool of competing peers; program instructions to determine a greatest accumulated fairness difference, as accumulated over a time period, between an accumulated usage percentage difference of the most-served competing peer and an accumulated usage percentage difference of the least-served competing peer; and program instructions to adjust a resource allocation such that resources from the most-served competing peer are allocated to the least-served competing peer if an adjustment condition is met, wherein the adjustment condition is based on at least one of (i) a greatest fairness difference, and (ii) whether the greatest accumulated fairness difference exceeds at least one threshold, and wherein the adjustment condition includes a determination that one or more resources used by the most-served competing peer can be gainfully utilized by the least-served competing peer.

Metadata:
- Claim Count in Document: 2.0
- Percentile: 96.0
- Lexical Diversity: 1.70769
- Patent Class: 709.0
- Transitional Phrase Type: open
- Component Type: 1
- Foreign Priority: False
- Related Applications: ['14869089', '14953453', '11151159', '13339586', '11488399']

Analysis Scores:
- 35 USC 101 Eligibility (BERT): 0.2673023991133105
- 35 USC 102 Novelty (BERT): 0.5601290610695021
- Combined Prediction Score: 0.2965850653089296
- Mean Citation Score: 274.979694
- Max Citation Score: 449.74866
- Similarity Product: 370.85871556292295

Labels:
- Claim Label 101: 1
- Claim Label 102: 1
- Claim Label 103: 1
- Claim Label 112: 1
- Combined Label: 1
- Label 101 Adjusted: 0

Dataset: test