PATENT CLAIM ANALYSIS

Application Number: 15889405
Application Type: Utility
Filing Date: 2018-02
Publication Date: 2019-01
Patent Classification: ["705", "007190"]

Abstract:
Embodiments of the present invention provide methods, computer program products, and systems for scheduling a meeting. Embodiments of the present invention can be used to calculate a level of criticality and flexibility for each unavailable member of a set of members of a meeting that can be used to prioritize unavailable members of the meeting. Embodiments of the present invention can be used to identify candidate meeting times based, at least in part, on the level of criticality and flexibility for each unavailable member.

Claim (Index 1):
A computer-implemented method comprising:\n receiving a set of meeting parameters for a meeting that include a set of members of the meeting, a subject of the meeting, and content for discussion in the meeting; calculating a level of criticality and a level of flexibility for each unavailable member of the set of members of the meeting, wherein: calculating a level of criticality for each unavailable member of the meeting comprises:\n acquiring a set of meeting history and a set of electronic message history associated with the set of members of the meeting, \n calculating a set of similarity scores utilizing the set of meeting parameters and the acquired set of meeting history and the acquired set of electronic message history by determining a similarity index utilizing a weighted cosine distance calculation for each of the set of meeting parameters, \n calculating a set of similarity indices by combining the set of similarity scores, and \n calculating a criticality score by summing the set of calculated similarity indices for the set of unavailable members of the meeting, and wherein \n calculating a level of flexibility for each unavailable member of the set of members of the meeting comprises:\n acquiring a criticality score of a conflicting meeting associated with an unavailable member of the set of members of the meeting, and \n dividing a predetermined constant, by the acquired criticality score of the conflicting meeting; \n combining the level of criticality and the level of flexibility for each unavailable member and mapping the combined level of criticality and the level of flexibility to respective time slots in a set of time slots specified by the meeting parameters, wherein combining the level of criticality and the level of flexibility for each unavailable member to a set of time slots specified by the meeting parameters comprises:\n mapping the level of criticality and the level of flexibility for each unavailable member to a set of time slots specified by the meeting parameters, \n summing the level of criticality for unavailable members of the set of members of the meeting, \n summing the level of flexibility for unavailable members of the set of members of the meeting, and \n subtracting the summed level of flexibility from the summed level of criticality; \n identifying candidate meeting times based, at least in part, on the combined level of criticality and flexibility for each unavailable member; receiving an indication to generate a list of recommended participants that are not specified as recipients of an electronic message; responsive to receiving an indication to generate a list of recommended participants that are not specified as recipients of an electronic message, calculating a level of criticality for a set of participants that are not specified as recipients of the electronic message; and populating a list of participants for the electronic message based on the calculated level of criticality.

Metadata:
- Claim Count in Document: 1.0
- Percentile: 88.0
- Lexical Diversity: 2.16667
- Patent Class: 705.0
- Transitional Phrase Type: open
- Component Type: 1
- Foreign Priority: False
- Related Applications: ['11864189', '14972728', '12726255', '10068033', '12726241']

Analysis Scores:
- 35 USC 101 Eligibility (BERT): 0.0797813501355606
- 35 USC 102 Novelty (BERT): 0.4630184863291759
- Combined Prediction Score: 0.1181050637549221
- Mean Citation Score: 117.226662
- Max Citation Score: 126.89562
- Similarity Product: 95.71142098344326

Labels:
- Claim Label 101: 0
- Claim Label 102: 1
- Claim Label 103: 1
- Claim Label 112: 1
- Combined Label: 0
- Label 101 Adjusted: 0

Dataset: test