PATENT CLAIM ANALYSIS

Application Number: 16113773
Application Type: Utility
Filing Date: 2018-08
Publication Date: 2019-01
Patent Classification: ["326", "016000"]

Abstract:
Aggressive technology scaling impacts parametric yield, life span, and reliability of circuits fabricated in advanced nanometric nodes. These issues may become showstoppers when scaling deeper to the sub-10nm domain. To mitigate them various approaches have been proposed including increasing guard-bands, fault-tolerant design, and canary circuits. Each of them is subject to several of the following drawbacks; large area, power, or performance penalty; false positives; false negatives; and in sufficient coverage of the failures encountered in the deep nanometric domain. The invention presents a highly efficient double-sampling architecture, which allow mitigating all these failures at low area and performance penalties, and also enable significant power reduction.

Claim (Index 1):
A circuit protected against delay faults and transient faults of selected duration, the circuit comprising:\n a combinatory logic circuit having at least one input and one output; at least a first sampling element having its output connected to said at least one input and activated by a clock, wherein the period of the clock is selected to be larger than the maximum delay of said combinatory logic circuit plus the maximum delay of said first sampling element; at least a second sampling element having its input connected to said at least one output and activated by said clock; a comparator circuit for analyzing the input and output of each said second sampling element and providing on its output an error detection signal, the comparator circuit setting said error detection signal at said pre-determined value if the input and output of at least one said second sampling element are different; and a third sampling element having its input connected to the output of said comparator and activated by said clock delayed by a first predetermined delay, say first predetermined delay is equal to: a first integer value equal to the Integer part of the division of said selected fault duration by: the maximum delay of said comparator, minus the maximum delay of said comparator for the transitions from the non error to the error state, plus the maximum delay of said second sampling element plus the setup time of said second sampling element plus a selected timing margin; multiplied by: the fractional part of a second division, say second division is the division of: said selected fault duration, plus the maximum delay of said comparator for the transitions from the non error to the error state, plus the setup time of said third sampling element, minus the setup time of said second sampling element; by the period of said clock; plus the difference of the integer value 1 minus said first integer value, multiplied by the fractional part of a third division, say third division is the division of: the maximum delay of said second sampling element, plus the maximum delay of said comparator, plus the setup time of said third sampling element, plus said selected timing margin; by the period of said clock; whereby the minimum value of: the minimum delay of said first sampling element plus the minimum delay of each path of said combinatory logic circuit plus the minimum delay of the path of said comparator circuit connecting the output of said this path of said combinatory circuit to the output of said comparator plus a selected timing delay; is larger than said first predetermined delay, plus the hold time of said third sampling element, plus said first integer value multiplied by the integer part of said second division, plus the difference of the integer value 1 minus said first integer value, multiplied by the fractional part of said third division.

Metadata:
- Claim Count in Document: 11.0
- Percentile: 96.0
- Lexical Diversity: 1.43529
- Patent Class: 326.0
- Transitional Phrase Type: open
- Component Type: 1
- Foreign Priority: False
- Related Applications: ['12932201', '12456477', '12101716', '12379019', '11206142']

Analysis Scores:
- 35 USC 101 Eligibility (BERT): 0.669038220349765
- 35 USC 102 Novelty (BERT): 0.4719179713380704
- Combined Prediction Score: 0.6493261954485956
- Mean Citation Score: 212.43157
- Max Citation Score: 238.28308
- Similarity Product: 211.99228861040592

Labels:
- Claim Label 101: 1
- Claim Label 102: 1
- Claim Label 103: 1
- Claim Label 112: 1
- Combined Label: 1
- Label 101 Adjusted: 1

Dataset: test