PATENT CLAIM ANALYSIS

Application Number: 16023078
Application Type: Utility
Filing Date: 2018-06
Publication Date: 2018-10
Patent Classification: ["705", "007320"]

Abstract:
A system and method for rating photographs and images is provided which evaluates the content of photographs and images as compared to reality and provides a standardized rating for the content which can be stored and accessed, and wherein the system can be programmed to provide comparative results and feedback to both website owners and content owners alike.

Claim (Index 1):
A tangible host system for evaluating and rating photographs and standardizing results, the system comprising:\n a request module in communication with a content database, wherein the request module receives a request from a user, wherein the request is based on an input by the user, wherein the request is refinable based upon a plurality of parameters, and wherein the request module sends a request to the content database and receives a response to a request from the content database, wherein the response includes a standardized rating; the content database comprising a storing module, a retrieving module, and an association module, and in communication with a network of peers, with a remote evaluator system and with the request module, that sends a response to the request for display through a display module to the user, receives a questionnaire  100  and associated information from the remote evaluator system, and receives content from a content owner through a network peer, wherein the content database storing module stores content inputted by the content owner and associated standardized rating information, wherein the content database retrieving module retrieves stored content and stored associated standardized rating information according to a request by a user, and wherein the content database associating module receives a standardized rating from a rating module of the remote evaluation system and associates a rating with a particular content stored in the content database; a plurality of peers, wherein each peer is in communication with the content database, wherein each peer has a receiving module which receives content inputted by the content owner, and wherein the receiving module of each peer sends the content information inputted by the content owner to the content database, and wherein each peer receives identifying criteria of a content owner to identify the content owner and content information; and a remote evaluator system in communication with the content database comprising:\n an input interface in communication with an evaluator module and an evaluator, and allows an evaluator to access the evaluation system via the input of login credentials; \n an evaluation module in communication with the input interface and a rating module, and which receives evaluator login credentials and location information, identifies a particular evaluator, selects a questionnaire type to present dependent upon evaluator login credentials and location information, assigns a unique identifier to the questionnaire selected, presents the questionnaire to an evaluator through the input interface, stores questionnaire information, questionnaire answers, and unique identifier information in connection with each questionnaire, and sends the questionnaire answers and information along with the unique identifier information to the rating module; and \n a rating module in communication with the evaluation module and to the content database, and which retrieves answers and information for a questionnaire with unique identifier, calculates a standardized rating for the questionnaire with unique identifier, and sends the standardized rating to the content database association module.

Metadata:
- Claim Count in Document: 29.0
- Percentile: 94.0
- Lexical Diversity: 1.57895
- Patent Class: 705.0
- Transitional Phrase Type: open
- Component Type: 1
- Foreign Priority: False
- Related Applications: ['09595050', '13230239', '12862912', '14198489', '14965770']

Analysis Scores:
- 35 USC 101 Eligibility (BERT): 0.089063322043102
- 35 USC 102 Novelty (BERT): 0.4945279682879241
- Combined Prediction Score: 0.1296097866675842
- Mean Citation Score: 154.343352
- Max Citation Score: 166.08444
- Similarity Product: 101.99823243473053

Labels:
- Claim Label 101: 0
- Claim Label 102: 1
- Claim Label 103: 0
- Claim Label 112: 1
- Combined Label: 0
- Label 101 Adjusted: 0

Dataset: test