What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify the disposition of the case, that is, the treatment the Supreme Court accorded the court whose decision it reviewed. The information relevant to this variable may be found near the end of the summary that begins on the title page of each case, or preferably at the very end of the opinion of the Court. For cases in which the Court granted a motion to dismiss, consider "petition denied or appeal dismissed". There is "no disposition" if the Court denied a motion to dismiss.

Opinion:
VASQUEZ v. UNITED STATES
No. 11-199.
Argued March 21, 2012
Decided April 2, 2012
Beau B. Brindley argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Joshua J. Jones and Blair T. Westover.
Anthony A. Yang argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Verrilli, Assistant Attorney General Breuer, Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, and Joel M. Gershowitz.
Briefs of amici curiae urging reversal were filed for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers by John D. Cline and Jeffrey T. Green; and for Jeffrey K. Skilling by Daniel M. Petrocelli, M. Randall Oppenheimer, Matthew T. Kline, David J. Marroso, Jonathan D. Hacker, and Anton Metlitsky.
A brief of amici curiae urging affirmance was filed for the State of Texas et al. by Greg Abbott, Attorney General of Texas, Jonathan F. Mitchell, Solicitor General, Daniel T. Hodge, First Assistant Attorney General, and Don Clemmer, Deputy Attorney General, and by the Attorneys General for their respective States as follows: Luther Strange of Alabama, Tom Horne of Arizona, John W. Suthers of Colorado, Joseph R. Biden III of Delaware, Pamela Jo Bondi of Florida, David M. Louie of Hawaii, Lisa Madigan of Illinois, Gregory F. Zoeller of Indiana, Jack Conway of Kentucky, James D. “Buddy” Caldwell of Louisiana, William J. Schneider of Maine, Bill Schuette of Michigan, Jon Bruning of Nebraska, Alan Wilson of South Carolina, J. B. Van Hollen of Wisconsin, and Gregory A. Phillips of Wyoming.
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.

Question: What is the disposition of the case, that is, the treatment the Supreme Court accorded the court whose decision it reviewed?

Choices:
stay, petition, or motion granted
affirmed (includes modified)
reversed
reversed and remanded
vacated and remanded
affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
vacated
petition denied or appeal dismissed
certification to or from a lower court
no disposition

Answer: 1