What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify whether the court opinion mentions that one or more of the members of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed dissented. Focus on whether there exists any statement to this effect in the opinion, for example "divided," "dissented," "disagreed," "split.". A reference, without more, to the "majority" or "plurality" does not necessarily evidence dissent (the other judges may have concurred). If a case arose on habeas corpus, indicate dissent if either the last federal court or the last state court to review the case contained one. If the highest court with jurisdiction to hear the case declines to do so by a divided vote, indicate dissent. If the lower court denies an en banc petition by a divided vote and the Supreme Court discusses same, indicate dissent.

Opinion:
January 28, 1952.
No. 169.
McGrath, Attorney General, Successor to the Alien Property Custodian, v. Nagano.
Argued November 29, 1951.
Decided January 28, 1952.
James D. Hill argued the cause fdr petitioner. With him on the brief.were Solicitor General. Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baynton, George B. Searls and Irwin A. Seibel. Edward R. Johnston argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
Per Curiam:
The .judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Question: Does the court opinion mention that one or more of the members of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed dissented?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1