What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify the reason, if any, given by the court for granting the petition for certiorari.

Opinion:
RICCI v. VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
No. 97-501.
Argued April 21, 1998
Decided May 4, 1998
Kenneth N. Flaxman argued the cause and filed briefs for petitioner.
David A. Strauss argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Jeffrey Edward Kehl.
Patricia A. Millett argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance. With her on the brief were Solicitor General Waxman, Acting Assistant Attorney General Keeney, Deputy Solicitor General Dreében, and William C. Brown.
Briefs of amid, curiae urging reversal were filed for the American Civil Liberties Union et al. by Susan N. Herman, Steven B. Shapiro, Harvey Grossman, and Stephen J. Sehulhofer; for Americans for Effective Law Enforcement, Inc., by Wayne W. Schmidt, James P. Manak, and Bernard J. Farber; and for the Institute for Justice by William H. Mellor, Clint Bolick, and Scott G. Bullock.
Bichard Buda and James I. Crowley filed a brief for the National League of Cities et al. as amici curiae urging affirmance.
William J. Mertens and Barbara Bergman filed a brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as amicus curiae.
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.

Question: What reason, if any, does the court give for granting the petition for certiorari?

Choices:
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted
federal court conflict
federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question
putative conflict
conflict between federal court and state court
state court conflict
federal court confusion or uncertainty
state court confusion or uncertainty
federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty
to resolve important or significant question
to resolve question presented
no reason given
other reason

Answer: 11