What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "natural person (excludes persons named in their official capacity or who appear because of a role in a private organization)". Your task is to determine the race or ethnic identity of this litigant as identified in the opinion. Names may be used to classify a person as hispanic if there is little ambiguity. All aliens are coded as "not ascertained".

Opinion:
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Victor Manuel BAUTISTA-GARCIA, Appellant.
No. 89-2506.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted March 13, 1990.
Decided May 16, 1990.
Wesley S. Dodge, Omaha, Neb., for appellant.
Michael P. Norris, Omaha, Neb., for ap-pellee.
Before McMILLIAN and BEAM, Circuit Judges, and HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
Victor Manuel Bautista-Garcia appeals from his conviction of two counts of creating and supplying false documents for use in an application for adjustment of status under the Special Agricultural Worker program in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1160(b)(7)(A)(ii) (1988). Bautista-Garcia was charged with supplying Immigration and Naturalization Forms 1-705 containing false confirmations of seasonal agricultural employment to two Mexican nationals who had entered the United States illegally.
Bautista-Garcia argues on appeal that the evidence at trial did not support the jury’s finding of guilt and that the district court erred in excluding as hearsay the opinion of an Immigration and Naturalization Service agent as to the origin of falsified signatures on the Forms 1-705. Because we find that sufficient evidence supports the jury’s verdict and that the district court made no error of law, we affirm, See 8th Cir. R. 14.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "natural person (excludes persons named in their official capacity or who appear because of a role in a private organization)". What is the race or ethnic identity of this litigant as identified in the opinion?

Choices:
not ascertained
caucasian - specific indication in opinion
black - specific indication in opinion
native american - specific indication in opinion
native american - assumed from name
asian - specific indication in opinion
asian - assumed from name
hispanic - specific indication in opinion
hispanic - assumed from name
other

Answer: 8