What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "sub-state government (e.g., county, local, special district)", specifically "other". Your task is to determine which specific substate government agency best describes this litigant.

Opinion:
Andrew CAPOROSSI v. ATLANTIC CITY, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey; Lester Warren, Inc., a corporation of the State of New Jersey, and Mollie Gerber and Shepard Gerber, Atlantic City, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey, Appellant.
No. 14661.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Feb. 20, 1964.
Decided March 10, 1964.
Samuel P. Orlando, Camden, N. J., for appellant.
Ralph W. Campbell, Asbury Park, N. J. (Campbell, Mangini, Foley & Lee, As-bury Park, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
' Before KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges, and KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict will be affirmed for the reasons so well stated by Judge Cohen in his excellent opinion reported at 220 F.Supp. 508 (D.C.N.J.1963).

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "sub-state government (e.g., county, local, special district)", specifically "other". Which specific substate government agency best describes this litigant?

Choices:
City of, county of, etc. - in corporate capacity - criminal case
city of, county of, etc. - in corporate capacity - civil case
Other sub-state activity
not ascertained

Answer: 3