What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court).

Opinion:
UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Jack JAMES, Relator-Appellant, v. Harold W. FOLLETTE, as Warden of Green Haven Prison, at Stormville, New York, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 688, Docket 33894.
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
Argued April 7, 1970.
Decided Sept. 21, 1970.
George J. Grumbach, Jr., New York City, for relator-appellant.
Hillel Hoffman, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Louis J. Lefkowitz, Atty. Gen., of the State of New York, Samuel A. Hirsho-witz, First Asst. Atty. Gen., of counsel), for respondent-appellee.
Before WATERMAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges, and ZAMPANO, District Judge.
Of the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant Jack James appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denying without a hearing his application for a writ of habeas corpus. We affirmed on the well-reasoned opinion of Judge Weinfeld, reported at 301 F.Supp. 569 (S.D.N.Y.1969).
While the District Court erroneously relied on 28 U.S.C. § 2244(a), which relates to federal detention and not to state prisoners, in support of its decision not to hold a hearing, this miscitation hardly warrants a reversal. The ruling was correct. The entire trial transcript, Judge Palmieri’s two prior opinions, and the Skobel report were thoroughly reviewed by Judge Weinfeld. 301 F.Supp. at 571. These documents provided an undisputed factual record sufficiently adequate to enable Judge Weinfeld to make an independent appraisal of appellant’s constitutional claims. Therefore there was no need for an evidentiary hearing. Townsend v. Sain, 372 U.S. 293, 312-313, 83 S.Ct. 745, 9 L.Ed.2d 770 (1963); United States ex rel. Mason v Murphy, 351 F.2d 610, 611 (2 Cir. 1965) (per curiam).
We are grateful to George J. Grum-bach, Jr., Esq., assigned counsel in this case, for his able presentation on appellant’s behalf.

Question: What is the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court)?

Choices:
Trial (either jury or bench trial)
Injunction or denial of injunction or stay of injunction
Summary judgment or denial of summary judgment
Guilty plea or denial of motion to withdraw plea
Dismissal (include dismissal of petition for habeas corpus)
Appeals of post judgment orders (e.g., attorneys' fees, costs, damages, JNOV - judgment nothwithstanding the verdict)
Appeal of post settlement orders
Not a final judgment: interlocutory appeal
Not a final judgment: mandamus
Other (e.g., pre-trial orders, rulings on motions, directed verdicts) or could not determine nature of final judgment
Does not fit any of the above categories, but opinion mentions a "trial judge"
Not applicable (e.g., decision below was by a federal administrative agency, tax court)

Answer: 4