What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine whether or not the first listed respondent is bankrupt. If there is no indication of whether or not the respondent is bankrupt, the respondent is presumed to be not bankrupt.

Opinion:
Spiro Peter KARABELOS v. UNITED STATES.
No. 10673.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Dec. 2, 1948.
No appearance for appellant.
Ray O’Donnell, of Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.
Before HICKS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause was heard upon the transcript of record, briefs and oral argument of the District Attorney; and it appearing to the court that this is an appeal from the denial of the application of appellant for the vacation of judgment and sentence or for correction of sentence; and it further appearing that there is no reversible'error upon the record: It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the order appealed from be and the same is in all things affirmed.

Question: Is the first listed respondent bankrupt?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1