What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify whether the court opinion mentions that one or more of the members of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed dissented. Focus on whether there exists any statement to this effect in the opinion, for example "divided," "dissented," "disagreed," "split.". A reference, without more, to the "majority" or "plurality" does not necessarily evidence dissent (the other judges may have concurred). If a case arose on habeas corpus, indicate dissent if either the last federal court or the last state court to review the case contained one. If the highest court with jurisdiction to hear the case declines to do so by a divided vote, indicate dissent. If the lower court denies an en banc petition by a divided vote and the Supreme Court discusses same, indicate dissent.

Opinion:
No. 125.
No. 224.
Arkansas & Louisiana Missouri Railway Co. et al. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., et al.; and United States et al. v. Amarillo-Borger Express, Inc., et al.
Argued December 4-5, 1957.
Decided March 11, 1957.
William B. McDowell argued the cause for appellants in No. 125. With him on the brief was J. T. Suggs. Robert W. Oinnane argued the cause for the United States and the Interstate Commerce Commission, appellants in No. 224. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Hansen and H. Neil Garson. Ralph W. Currie argued the cause and filed a brief for appellees.
Per Curiam:
The judgment is vacated and the cases are remanded to the District Court with directions to dismiss the cause as moot.
Mr. Justice Erankeurter and Mr. Justice Douglas dissent.
Reported below: 138 F. Supp. 411.

Question: Does the court opinion mention that one or more of the members of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed dissented?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1