What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the federal agency (if any) whose decision was reviewed by the court of appeals. If there was no prior agency action, choose "not applicable".

Opinion:
KING v. NIXON.
No. 11569.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued May 13, 1953.
Decided Aug. 27, 1953.
Mr. Saul G. Lichtenberg, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Ira M. Lowe and Mr. Evan T. Davis, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. William E. Owen, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before EDGERTON, FAHY and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The District Court rightly ruled that recovery of exemplary or punitive damages, in a civil action for assault and battery, is not precluded by the fact that the defendant may be liable to criminal prosecution, and also that the defendant’s financial condition is admissible in evidence as bearing on the amount of such damages. Brown v. Evans, C.C., 17 F. 912; affirmed, Evans v. Brown, 1883, 109 U.S. 180, 3 S.Ct. 83, 27 L.Ed. 898; notes, 16 A.L.R. 771, 798, 838, 123 A.L.R. 1115, 1122, 1136.
Affirmed.
. Language to the contrary in Huber v. Teuber, 1879, 3 MacArthur 484, 497, 10 D.C. 484, is erroneous.

Question: What federal agency's decision was reviewed by the court of appeals?

Choices:
Benefits Review Board
Civil Aeronautics Board
Civil Service Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Power Commission
Federal Maritime Commission
Federal Trade Commission
Interstate Commerce Commission
National Labor Relations Board
Atomic Energy Commission
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Securities & Exchange Commission
Other federal agency
Not ascertained or not applicable

Answer: 14