What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine whether or not the first listed respondent is bankrupt. If there is no indication of whether or not the respondent is bankrupt, the respondent is presumed to be not bankrupt.

Opinion:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Michael Miles RAMSEY, Appellant.
No. 26245.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 5, 1971.
Michael Hegner (argued), San Diego, Cal., for appellant.
Shelby R. Gott (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Harry Stewart, U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, MURRAH and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
The Honorable Alfred P. Murrali, Senior Circuit Judge. Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM:
The judgment of conviction is affirmed.
On the sufficiency of the evidence, the somewhat weak circumstances presented were shored up on knowledge, transportation and importation by Ramsey’s many inconsistent statements. Taken together, these statements could permit affirmative inferences.

Question: Is the first listed respondent bankrupt?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1