What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify whether administrative action occurred in the context of the case prior to the onset of litigation. The activity may involve an administrative official as well as that of an agency. To determine whether administration action occurred in the context of the case, consider the material which appears in the summary of the case preceding the Court's opinion and, if necessary, those portions of the prevailing opinion headed by a I or II. Action by an agency official is considered to be administrative action except when such an official acts to enforce criminal law. If an agency or agency official "denies" a "request" that action be taken, such denials are considered agency action. Exclude: a "challenge" to an unapplied agency rule, regulation, etc.; a request for an injunction or a declaratory judgment against agency action which, though anticipated, has not yet occurred; a mere request for an agency to take action when there is no evidence that the agency did so; agency or official action to enforce criminal law; the hiring and firing of political appointees or the procedures whereby public officials are appointed to office; attorney general preclearance actions pertaining to voting; filing fees or nominating petitions required for access to the ballot; actions of courts martial; land condemnation suits and quiet title actions instituted in a court; and federally funded private nonprofit organizations.

Opinion:
ALITALIA-LINEE AEREE ITALIANE, S. p. A. v. LISI et al.
No. 70.
Argued March 11, 1968.
Decided March 25, 1968.
George N. Tompkins, Jr., argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Austin P. Magner.
Theodore E. Wolcott argued the cause and filed a brief for respondents.
Briefs of amici curiae, urging reversal, were filed by Edwin Longcope for the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland; by Robert MacCrate for Canada; by Alfred C. Clapp for the Republic of Italy; and by John E. Stephen, Joseph F. Healy, Jr., Harold L. Warner, Jr., Carl S. Rowe and Paul G. Pennoyer, Jr., for the Air Transport Association of America et al.
Briefs of amici curiae, urging affirmance, were filed by Samuel Langermm and Walter H. Beckham, Jr., for the American Trial Lawyers Association, by Stuart M. Speiser for Arnold Holtzman, and by Lee S. Kreindler for Bates Block.
Briefs of amici curiae were filed by Solicitor General Griswold, Morton Hollander and Joseph B. Goldman for the Civil Aeronautics Board, and by William A. Jennings for the Airline Passengers Association.
Per Curiam.
The judgments are affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Question: Did administrative action occur in the context of the case?

Choices:
No
Yes

Answer: 0