What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court).

Opinion:
Joseph Jean Jacques LaROCHELLE, a/k/a Jack LaRochelle, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Walter A. SAHLI, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization Service at Detroit, Michigan, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 14813.
. United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
Oct. 17, 1963.
Harry Kobel, Rosin & Kobel, Detroit, Mich., for appellant.
Lawrence Gubow, U. S. Atty., William H. Merrill, Chief Asst. U. S. Atty., Detroit, Mich., for appellee.
Before MILLER and WEICK, Circuit Judges, and PECK, District Judge.
ORDER.
Subsequent to the judgment of the District Court, the United States Supreme Court on June 17, 1963, decided the case of Rosenberg v. Fleuti, 374 U.S. 449, 83 S.Ct. 1804, 10 L.Ed.2d 1000, which ruling has a material bearing on the issue in this case.
Appellee has moved to vacate the judgment of the District Court and to remand the case with directions that the parties be given leave to amend their pleadings to put in issue the question of “entry”, in accordance with the principles laid down in Rosenberg v. Fleuti, supra, which motion the appellant does not oppose.
The motion is sustained and it is so ordered.

Question: What is the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court)?

Choices:
Trial (either jury or bench trial)
Injunction or denial of injunction or stay of injunction
Summary judgment or denial of summary judgment
Guilty plea or denial of motion to withdraw plea
Dismissal (include dismissal of petition for habeas corpus)
Appeals of post judgment orders (e.g., attorneys' fees, costs, damages, JNOV - judgment nothwithstanding the verdict)
Appeal of post settlement orders
Not a final judgment: interlocutory appeal
Not a final judgment: mandamus
Other (e.g., pre-trial orders, rulings on motions, directed verdicts) or could not determine nature of final judgment
Does not fit any of the above categories, but opinion mentions a "trial judge"
Not applicable (e.g., decision below was by a federal administrative agency, tax court)

Answer: 9