What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court).

Opinion:
AMALGAMATED CLOTHING WORKERS OF AMERICA, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Henry I. Siegel Co., Inc., Intervenor. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. HENRY I. SIEGEL CO., Inc., Respondent. HENRY I. SIEGEL CO., Inc., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO, Intervenor.
Nos. 21086, 21131, 21316.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued March 20, 1968.
Decided July 15, 1969.
Certiorari Denied Jan. 12, 1970.
See 90 S.Ct. 556.
Mr. Clifford D. Reznicek, New York City, of the bar of the Supreme Court of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, with whom Mr. Jacob Sheink-man, New York City, was on the brief, for petitioner in No. 21,086 and inter-venor in No. 21,316.
Mr. Elliott Moore, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Mr. Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Mr. Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Mr. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Assistant General Counsel, and Mr. Harold B. Zanoff, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, were on the brief, for respondent in Nos. 21,086 and 21,316 and petitioner in No. 21,131.
Mr. Osmond K. Fraenkel, New York City, for intervenor in No. 21,086, respondent in No. 21,131, and petitioner in No. 21,316.
Before BAZELON, Chief Judge, PRETTYMAN, Senior Circuit Judge, and WRIGHT, MeGOWAN, TAMM, LEVENTHAL, ROBINSON, MacKIN-NON, and ROBB, Circuit Judges.
PRETTYMAN, Senior Circuit Judge:
In this case the Labor Board set aside an election on account of unfair labor practices by an- employer and thereupon issued a bargaining order upon the evidence of authorization cards. Upon the authority of the opinion and decision of the Supreme Court in NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., et al., the decision and ruling of the Board are affirmed. It will present an appropriate order of enforcement.
. 395 U.S. 575, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969).

Question: What is the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court)?

Choices:
Trial (either jury or bench trial)
Injunction or denial of injunction or stay of injunction
Summary judgment or denial of summary judgment
Guilty plea or denial of motion to withdraw plea
Dismissal (include dismissal of petition for habeas corpus)
Appeals of post judgment orders (e.g., attorneys' fees, costs, damages, JNOV - judgment nothwithstanding the verdict)
Appeal of post settlement orders
Not a final judgment: interlocutory appeal
Not a final judgment: mandamus
Other (e.g., pre-trial orders, rulings on motions, directed verdicts) or could not determine nature of final judgment
Does not fit any of the above categories, but opinion mentions a "trial judge"
Not applicable (e.g., decision below was by a federal administrative agency, tax court)

Answer: 9