What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify whether administrative action occurred in the context of the case prior to the onset of litigation. The activity may involve an administrative official as well as that of an agency. To determine whether administration action occurred in the context of the case, consider the material which appears in the summary of the case preceding the Court's opinion and, if necessary, those portions of the prevailing opinion headed by a I or II. Action by an agency official is considered to be administrative action except when such an official acts to enforce criminal law. If an agency or agency official "denies" a "request" that action be taken, such denials are considered agency action. Exclude: a "challenge" to an unapplied agency rule, regulation, etc.; a request for an injunction or a declaratory judgment against agency action which, though anticipated, has not yet occurred; a mere request for an agency to take action when there is no evidence that the agency did so; agency or official action to enforce criminal law; the hiring and firing of political appointees or the procedures whereby public officials are appointed to office; attorney general preclearance actions pertaining to voting; filing fees or nominating petitions required for access to the ballot; actions of courts martial; land condemnation suits and quiet title actions instituted in a court; and federally funded private nonprofit organizations.

Opinion:
EDWARDS, GOVERNOR OF LOUISIANA, et al. v. HEALY et al.
No. 73-759.
Argued October 16, 1974
Decided June 9, 1975
Kendall L. Vick, Assistant Attorney General of Louisiana, argued the cause for appellants. On the. brief were William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General, and Warren E. Mouledoux, First Assistant Attorney General.
Ruth Bader Ginsburg argued the cause for appellees. With her on the brief was Melvin L. Wulf
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed by Chesterfield Smith and Marguerite Bawalt for the American Bar Assn., and by Nancy Stearns for the Center for Constitutional Rights.
Per Curiam.
The judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana is vacated and the case is remanded to that court to consider whether in the light of recent changes in the state constitutional, statutory, and other rules applicable to this case the cause has become moot.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the decision of this case.

Question: Did administrative action occur in the context of the case?

Choices:
No
Yes

Answer: 0