What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine whether or not the first listed respondent is bankrupt. If there is no indication of whether or not the respondent is bankrupt, the respondent is presumed to be not bankrupt.

Opinion:
SOULE-HOFFMAN COMPANY, a Corporation, Appellant, v. John T. WILKINS, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Fleetwood of Hender-sonville Hotel Corporation, Bankrupt, J. R. Crye, J. E. Garland, and Palmer Blackburn, Appellees.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
May 4, 1929.
No. 2746.
Tillett, Tillett & Kennedy, of Charlotte, N. C., for appellant.
A. Y. Arledge and C. D. Weeks, both of Hendersonville, N. C., and Stephen Nettles, of Greenville, S. C., for appellees.
PER CURIAM.
Case dismissed, under rule 20, per agreement of counsel.

Question: Is the first listed respondent bankrupt?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 0