What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify whether the petitioning party (i.e., the plaintiff or the appellant) emerged victorious. The victory the Supreme Court provided the petitioning party may not have been total and complete (e.g., by vacating and remanding the matter rather than an unequivocal reversal), but the disposition is nonetheless a favorable one. Consider that the petitioning party lost if the Supreme Court affirmed or dismissed the case, or denied the petition. Consider that the petitioning party won in part or in full if the Supreme Court reversed, reversed and remanded, vacated and remanded, affirmed and reversed in part, affirmed and reversed in part and remanded, or vacated the case.

Opinion:
April 12, 1993
No. 91-2086.
Granite State Insurance Co. v. Tandy Corp. et al.
C. A. 5th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 506 U. S. 813. ] Writ of certiorari dismissed under this Court’s Rule 46.
[Reporter’S Note: Argued February 23, 1993. Ann E. Webb argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the brief was Theodore G. Dimitry.
Lynne Liberato argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Mark C. Hill.]

Question: Consider that the petitioning party lost if the Supreme Court affirmed or dismissed the case, or denied the petition. Consider that the petitioning party won in part or in full if the Supreme Court reversed, reversed and remanded, vacated and remanded, affirmed and reversed in part, affirmed and reversed in part and remanded, or vacated the case. Did the petitioning win the case?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1