What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the state or territory in which the case was first heard. If the case began in the federal district court, consider the state of that district court. If it is a habeas corpus case, consider the state of the state court that first heard the case. If the case originated in a federal administrative agency, answer "not applicable". Answer with the name of the state, or one of the following territories: District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, Panama Canal Zone, or "not applicable" or "not determined".

Opinion:
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Roy Lee CLARK, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-6011.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Sept. 10, 1990.
ORDER
Before: KENNEDY and MILBURN, Circuit Judges; and PECK, Senior Circuit Judge.
Defendant Roy Lee Clark, appeals the district court’s order affirming, following a de novo review, the magistrate’s order that the defendant be detained pending trial. The government has filed a brief opposing Clark’s pretrial release. Upon consideration of the relevant documents, we conclude that the district court did not err in denying pretrial release. See 18 U.S.C. § 3142(e); United States v. Hazime, 762 F.2d 34 (6th Cir.1985).
It is therefore ORDERED that the district court’s order denying pretrial bond is affirmed.

Question: In what state or territory was the case first heard?

Choices:
not
Alabama
Alaska
Arizona
Arkansas
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Hawaii
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kansas
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachussets
Michigan
Minnesota
Mississippi
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New
New
New
New
North
North
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode
South
South
Tennessee
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West
Wisconsin
Wyoming
Virgin
Puerto
District
Guam
not
Panama

Answer: 0