What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "unclear". Your task is to determine what subcategory of business best describes this litigant.

Opinion:
Patricia GILLOOLY v. ELJAN CORP., a Corporation of New Jersey, Succasunna Realty Corp., a Corporation of New Jersey, Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, d/b/a Triple Lake Ranch and Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, Individually. Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, d/b/a Triple Lake Ranch and Eli Gaynor and Janice Gaynor, Individually, Appellants.
No. 15375.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Dec. 13, 1965.
Decided Jan. 14, 1966.
Allan Maitlin, Newark, N. J. (Feuerstein & Sachs, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellants.
John A. Gleeson, Newark, N. J. (Mead, Gleeson, Hansen & Pantages, Newark, N. J., George P. Lacay, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
Before McLAUGHLIN, HASTIE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This case was fairly tried and properly submitted to the jury. We have carefully examined all of appellants’ points for appeal. There is no error of any substance in the trial record.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "unclear". What subcategory of business best describes this litigant?

Choices:
auto industry
chemical industry
drug industry
food industry
oil & gas industry
clothing & textile industry
electronic industry
alcohol and tobacco industry
other
unclear

Answer: 9