What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court).

Opinion:
J. W. BRABNER-SMITH, Appellant, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA REDEVELOPMENT LAND AGENCY, Appellee.
No. 15655.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued June 16, 1960.
Decided June 30, 1960.
Mr. Robert H. McNeill, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Ralph A. Ricketts, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. S. Billingsley Hill, Atty., Dept, of Justice, with whom Messrs. Roger P. Marquis and Robert R. MacLeod, Attys., Dept, of Justice, were on the brief, for appellee.
Before Pkettyman, Chief Judge, and Bazelon and Bastían, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant owned property which was condemned under an urban redevelopment plan. After trial before a judge and a jury he was rendered an award. He complains here of several rulings of the court upon the admission and the exclusion of evidence. He also complains of the amount of the verdict in view of the evidence presented. We find no error.
Affirmed.
. 45 Stat. 1415 (1929), D.C.Code §§ 16-619 to 16-644 (1951); 60 Stat. 790 (1946), as amended, D.C.Code § 5-701 et seq. (1951).

Question: What is the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court)?

Choices:
Trial (either jury or bench trial)
Injunction or denial of injunction or stay of injunction
Summary judgment or denial of summary judgment
Guilty plea or denial of motion to withdraw plea
Dismissal (include dismissal of petition for habeas corpus)
Appeals of post judgment orders (e.g., attorneys' fees, costs, damages, JNOV - judgment nothwithstanding the verdict)
Appeal of post settlement orders
Not a final judgment: interlocutory appeal
Not a final judgment: mandamus
Other (e.g., pre-trial orders, rulings on motions, directed verdicts) or could not determine nature of final judgment
Does not fit any of the above categories, but opinion mentions a "trial judge"
Not applicable (e.g., decision below was by a federal administrative agency, tax court)

Answer: 0