What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine whether or not the first listed respondent is bankrupt. If there is no indication of whether or not the respondent is bankrupt, the respondent is presumed to be not bankrupt.

Opinion:
Michael ROMBERG; Debra Romberg, Plaintiffs/Appellees-Cross-Appellants, v. Robert NICHOLS; Dennis Lazzari; Hugh Lloyd; Johnny Jurtado; Thomas Laing; Diane Hannon; R.D. Campbell, Defendants/Appellants-Cross-Appellees.
Nos. 90-56125, 91-55012.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
June 8, 1993.
Stephen Yagman, Yagman & Yagman, Venice, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants.
Keith A. Fink, Cotkin & Collins, Los Ange-les, CA, for defendants-appellees.
Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, THOMPSON and O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
Pursuant to the order of the Supreme Court of the United States, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1038, 122 L.Ed.2d 348 we vacate the award of attorneys’ fees and remand this case to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for reconsideration in light of Farrar v. Hobby, - U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 566, 121 L.Ed.2d 494 (1992).

Question: Is the first listed respondent bankrupt?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1