What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court).

Opinion:
L. ABELSON & SON, INC., Appellant v. SUPERIOR COAT CO., Inc., and Max Karp.
No. 13409.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Nov. 15, 1960.
Decided Dec. 7, 1960.
Julius L. Goldstein, New York City, for appellant.
Samuel H. Landy, Philadelphia, Pa., for appellees.
Before GOODRICH, KALODNER and STALEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction under rule 54(b) Fed.R. Civ.P., 28 U.S.C.A. The rule reads directly upon this case. In the argument before us the facts of the case showed clearly the wisdom of the rule with regard to situations such as this. For that reason the request for permission to petition the district court for the certificate which would enable the case to be heard at this stage will be denied.

Question: What is the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court)?

Choices:
Trial (either jury or bench trial)
Injunction or denial of injunction or stay of injunction
Summary judgment or denial of summary judgment
Guilty plea or denial of motion to withdraw plea
Dismissal (include dismissal of petition for habeas corpus)
Appeals of post judgment orders (e.g., attorneys' fees, costs, damages, JNOV - judgment nothwithstanding the verdict)
Appeal of post settlement orders
Not a final judgment: interlocutory appeal
Not a final judgment: mandamus
Other (e.g., pre-trial orders, rulings on motions, directed verdicts) or could not determine nature of final judgment
Does not fit any of the above categories, but opinion mentions a "trial judge"
Not applicable (e.g., decision below was by a federal administrative agency, tax court)

Answer: 9