What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to determine the treatment the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed accorded the decision of the court it reviewed, that is, whether the court below the Supreme Court (typically a federal court of appeals or a state supreme court) affirmed, reversed, remanded, denied or dismissed the decision of the court it reviewed (typically a trial court). Adhere to the language used in the "holding" in the summary of the case on the title page or prior to Part I of the Court's opinion. Exceptions to the literal language are the following: where the Court overrules the lower court, treat this a petition or motion granted; where the court whose decision the Supreme Court is reviewing refuses to enforce or enjoins the decision of the court, tribunal, or agency which it reviewed, treat this as reversed; where the court whose decision the Supreme Court is reviewing enforces the decision of the court, tribunal, or agency which it reviewed, treat this as affirmed; where the court whose decision the Supreme Court is reviewing sets aside the decision of the court, tribunal, or agency which it reviewed, treat this as vacated; if the decision is set aside and remanded, treat it as vacated and remanded.

Opinion:
WEYHRAUCH v. UNITED STATES
No. 08-1196.
Argued December 8, 2009
Decided June 24, 2010
Donald B. Ayer argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Douglas. Pope, Brian J. Murray, and Nicole C. H. Massey.
Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Kagan, Assistant Attorney General Breuer, and Anthony A. Yang.
Abbe David Lowell, Paul M. Thompson, and Jeffrey W. Mikoni filed a brief for the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers as amicus curiae urging reversal.
Albert W. Alschuler, pro se, filed a brief as amicus curiae.
Per Curiam.
The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Skilling v. United States, ante, p. 358.

Question: What treatment did the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed accorded the decision of the court it reviewed?

Choices:
stay, petition, or motion granted
affirmed
reversed
reversed and remanded
vacated and remanded
affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
vacated
petition denied or appeal dismissed
modify
remand
unusual disposition

Answer: 3