What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine whether or not the second listed respondent is bankrupt. If there is no indication of whether or not the respondent is bankrupt, the respondent is presumed to be not bankrupt.

Opinion:
Alvin H. FRANKEL, Guardian of the Estate of Carol Tillman, a minor, Appellant, v. Edward Hoge VICK, M.D. and Clarence C. Briscoe, M.D.
No. 14679.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued April 21, 1964.
Decided May 14, 1964.
James E. Beasley, Philadelphia, Pa. (Sheldon L. Albert, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellant.
Francis E. Shields, Philadelphia, Pa. (Pepper, Hamilton & Scheetz, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee Clarence C. Briscoe, M. D.
Perry S. Bechtle, Philadelphia, Pa. (Krusen, Evans & Byrne, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee Edward Hoge Vick, M. D.
Before KALODNER, FORMAN and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On review of the record we find no error. The judgment of the District Court of February 1, 1963, entered pursuant to the jury’s verdict in favor of the defendants will be affirmed.

Question: Is the second listed respondent bankrupt?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1