What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the federal agency (if any) whose decision was reviewed by the court of appeals. If there was no prior agency action, choose "not applicable".

Opinion:
Arthur NAZZARO, Appellant, v. Martin WEINER and Texstyle Dyeing & Printing Corp., a Corporation of the State of New York, Cross-Appellants.
Nos. 15174, 15175.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Oct. 18, 1965.
Decided Nov. 3, 1965.
Donald A. Robinson, Newark, N. J. (Shanley & Fisher, Attorneys for Plaintiff-Appellant and Cross-Appellee, Newark, N. J., David S. Cramp, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for Appellant in 15174 and for Appellee in 15175.
Leonard I. Garth, Paterson, N. J. (Cole, Berman & Garth, Attorneys for Defendants-Appellees and Cross-Appellants, Paterson, N. J. on the brief), for Appellants in 15175 and for Appellee in 15174.
Before McLAUGHLIN, FORMAN and GANEY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
In these appeals the allowance of voluntary nonsuits to the parties and of costs to the defendants was clearly within the trial court’s discretion.
The orders of the district court will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Wortendyke, 38 F.R.D. 430.

Question: What federal agency's decision was reviewed by the court of appeals?

Choices:
Benefits Review Board
Civil Aeronautics Board
Civil Service Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Power Commission
Federal Maritime Commission
Federal Trade Commission
Interstate Commerce Commission
National Labor Relations Board
Atomic Energy Commission
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Securities & Exchange Commission
Other federal agency
Not ascertained or not applicable

Answer: 14