What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify whether the court opinion mentions that one or more of the members of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed dissented. Focus on whether there exists any statement to this effect in the opinion, for example "divided," "dissented," "disagreed," "split.". A reference, without more, to the "majority" or "plurality" does not necessarily evidence dissent (the other judges may have concurred). If a case arose on habeas corpus, indicate dissent if either the last federal court or the last state court to review the case contained one. If the highest court with jurisdiction to hear the case declines to do so by a divided vote, indicate dissent. If the lower court denies an en banc petition by a divided vote and the Supreme Court discusses same, indicate dissent.

Opinion:
WHITE, EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF SMITH v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 88-928.
Argued October 3, 1989
Decided October 16, 1989
Kenneth A. Payment argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was James M. White, pro se.
Alan I. Horowitz argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Starr, Assistant Attorney General Peterson, Deputy Solicitor General Wallace, Charles E. Brookhart, and Joan I. Oppenheimer.
Waller H. Horsley, Louis A. Craco, Charles E. Heming, Jonathan G. Blattmachr, Arthur M. Sherwood, Alexander C. Cordes, Sanford J. Schlesinger, Jules J. Haskel, Albert Kalter, Thomas P. Sweeney, and Geraldine S. Hemmerling filed a brief for the New York State Bar Association et al. as amici curiae urging reversal.
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Justice White dissents.

Question: Does the court opinion mention that one or more of the members of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed dissented?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1