What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court).

Opinion:
THE SAN ANTONIO. O. T. JOHNSON, Appellant, v. SOUTHERN STEAMSHIP CO., Owner and Claimant, Appellee.
No. 4853.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
Aug. 24, 1932.
Iieliearing Denied Dec. 5, 1932.
Mortimer W. H. Cox, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellant.
Robert G. Erskine and M. Hampton Todd, both of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The testimony in this case has had full and careful consideration by each member of this court and collectively in conference. Since then such proofs have been again studied.
The ease turns on the basic question of fact, whether the libelant was ever employed by the steamship company. This was found against the libelant by the court below, a conclusion in which we concur. The decree below is therefore affirmed.

Question: What is the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court)?

Choices:
Trial (either jury or bench trial)
Injunction or denial of injunction or stay of injunction
Summary judgment or denial of summary judgment
Guilty plea or denial of motion to withdraw plea
Dismissal (include dismissal of petition for habeas corpus)
Appeals of post judgment orders (e.g., attorneys' fees, costs, damages, JNOV - judgment nothwithstanding the verdict)
Appeal of post settlement orders
Not a final judgment: interlocutory appeal
Not a final judgment: mandamus
Other (e.g., pre-trial orders, rulings on motions, directed verdicts) or could not determine nature of final judgment
Does not fit any of the above categories, but opinion mentions a "trial judge"
Not applicable (e.g., decision below was by a federal administrative agency, tax court)

Answer: 9