What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify whether the court opinion mentions that one or more of the members of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed dissented. Focus on whether there exists any statement to this effect in the opinion, for example "divided," "dissented," "disagreed," "split.". A reference, without more, to the "majority" or "plurality" does not necessarily evidence dissent (the other judges may have concurred). If a case arose on habeas corpus, indicate dissent if either the last federal court or the last state court to review the case contained one. If the highest court with jurisdiction to hear the case declines to do so by a divided vote, indicate dissent. If the lower court denies an en banc petition by a divided vote and the Supreme Court discusses same, indicate dissent.

Opinion:
HESTER v. ILLINOIS
No. 82.
Argued November 18, 1969
Decided April 27, 1970
Marshall Kaplan argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Edward Kaplan.
Joel M. Flaum, Assistant Attorney General of Illinois, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were William J. Scott, Attorney General, and James R. Thompson, James B. Zagel, Thomas J. Immel, and Morton E. Friedman, Assistant Attorneys General.
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Douglas, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Marshall dissent.

Question: Does the court opinion mention that one or more of the members of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed dissented?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 0