What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine whether or not the first listed respondent is bankrupt. If there is no indication of whether or not the respondent is bankrupt, the respondent is presumed to be not bankrupt.

Opinion:
J. C. SMITH, Plaintiff in Error, v. Speed MANKIN, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
November 19, 1926.)
No. 2541.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Virginia, at Big Stone Gap; Henry Clay McDowell, Judge.
R. -T. Irvine, of Big Stone Gap, Va. (A. A. Skeen, of Clintwood, Va., on the brief), for plaintiff in error.
George C. Sutherland, of Clintwood, Va. (S. H. Sutherland, C. Rufus McCoy, Roland E. Chase, S. H. & George C. Sutherland, and Chase & McCoy, all of Clintwood, Va., on the brief), for defendant in error.
Before WADDILL and ROSE, Circuit Judges, and McCLINTIC, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The plaintiff in error, the defendant below, has no cause to complain of the rulings of the District Court taken as a whole, and his adversary has not sued out a cross-writ.
Affirmed.

Question: Is the first listed respondent bankrupt?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1