What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous", specifically "other". Your task is to determine which of the following specific subcategories best describes the litigant.

Opinion:
In the Matter of ENDICOTT COMPANY, Bankrupt. John F. Endicott and R. Paul Endicott, Appellants.
No. 14931.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 5, 1965.
Decided Jan. 28, 1965.
Albert H. Gold, Philadelphia, Pa. (Bernard D. Beitch, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellants.
Jack B. Justice, Philadelphia, Pa. (Drinker Biddle & Reath, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
An examination of the record and of the briefs of the parties and consideration of the oral arguments disclose no error here. Accordingly, the judgment will be affirmed on the succinct opinion of Judge Kirkpatrick, D.C., 238 F.Supp. 163.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous", specifically "other". Which of the following specific subcategories best describes the litigant?

Choices:
Indian Tribes
Foreign Government
Multi-state agencies, boards, etc. (e.g., Port Authority of NY)
International Organizations
Other
Not ascertained

Answer: 5