What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine whether or not the first listed respondent is bankrupt. If there is no indication of whether or not the respondent is bankrupt, the respondent is presumed to be not bankrupt.

Opinion:
Willis E. GEORGE and Robert Whitaker, Appellants, v. STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA and W. M. Manning, Warden, South Carolina State Penitentiary, et al., Appellees.
No. 8242.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued Jan. 6, 1961.
Decided Jan. 12, 1961.
Russell Alton Wright, Richmond, Va. (Court-assigned counsel), for appellants.
J. C. Coleman, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen. of South Carolina (Daniel R. McLeod, Atty. Gen. of South Carolina, on the brief), for appellees.
Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge, and HUTCHESON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
These state court prisoners filed petitions for writs of habeas corpus which do not disclose any attempt to exhaust state remedies and do not suggest any reason for having failed to pursue those remedies. The District Judge properly dismissed the petitions for that reason.
The District Judge has not issued a certificate of probable cause for appeal. Since our examination discloses no ground for appeal, the members of this court decline to grant such a certificate. The appeal will be dismissed for want of a certificate of probable cause. See Burgess v. Warden, Maryland House of Correction, 4 Cir., 284 F.2d 486.
Appeal dismissed.

Question: Is the first listed respondent bankrupt?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1