What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify the reason, if any, given by the court for granting the petition for certiorari.

Opinion:
ADAY et al. v. UNITED STATES.
No. 149.
Decided June 12, 1967.
Stanley Fleishman for petitioners.
Solicitor General Marshall for the United States.
Melvin L. Wulj, Rolland R. O’Hare and Erwin B. Ellmann for the American Civil Liberties Union et al., and Horace S. Manges for the American Book Publishers Council, Inc., as amici curiae, in support of the petition.
Charles H. Keating, Jr., and James J. Clancy for Citizens for Decent Literature, Inc., as amicus curiae, in opposition to the petition.
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is reversed. Redrup v. New York, 386 U. S. 767.
The Chief Justice and Mr. Justice Brennan would grant the petition, vacate the judgment, and remand in light of Memoirs v. Massachusetts, 383 U. S. 413.
Mr. Justice Clark would grant the petition and affirm.
Mr. Justice Harlan concurs in the reversal on the basis of the reasoning set forth in his opinions in Roth v. United States, 354 U. S. 476, 496, and Manual Enterprises, Inc. v. Day, 370 U. S. 478.

Question: What reason, if any, does the court give for granting the petition for certiorari?

Choices:
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted
federal court conflict
federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question
putative conflict
conflict between federal court and state court
state court conflict
federal court confusion or uncertainty
state court confusion or uncertainty
federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty
to resolve important or significant question
to resolve question presented
no reason given
other reason

Answer: 11