What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine whether or not the first listed respondent is bankrupt. If there is no indication of whether or not the respondent is bankrupt, the respondent is presumed to be not bankrupt.

Opinion:
Katharine M. DRIER et al., Appellants, v. John W. SNYDER, Secretary of the Treasury, et al., Appellees.
No. 9902.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued April 15, 1949.
Decided June 13, 1949.
Mr. J. Roy Thompson, Jr., Washington, D. C., for appellant Drier. Messrs. Bernard J. Gallagher and M. Walton Hendry, Washington, D. G, entered appearances and were on the brief for appellant Drier.
Mr. Harold G. Aron, Washington, D. G, with whom Mr. Richard L. Merrick, Washington, D. G, was on the brief, for appellants Standard Commercial Tobacco Company and Standard Steamship Corporation.
Mr. Samuel K. Abrams, Assistant United States Attorney, Washington D. C, with whom Messrs. George Morris Fay, United States Attorney, and John D. Lane, Assistant United States Attorney, Washington, D. G, were on the brief for appellees. Messrs. Oliver Dibble and Sidney S. Sachs, Washington, D. G, also entered appearrances for appellees.
Before CLARK and PROCTOR, JJ., and ARTHUR F. LEDERLE, District Judge, sitting by designation.
PER CURIAM.
This court has closely examined the .available record and finds no1 error in it to justify reversal. The judgment of the .trial court is therefore affirmed.

Question: Is the first listed respondent bankrupt?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1