What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the federal agency (if any) whose decision was reviewed by the court of appeals. If there was no prior agency action, choose "not applicable".

Opinion:
Morris STEINBERG, Appellant, v. J. L. DORFMAN and Sol Schoeman, Appellees.
No. 19985.
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.
Feb. 3, 1966.
Rodney Moss, Brown & Brown, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
Aaron Elmore, Wiseman & Elmore, Beverly Hills, Cal., Lewis, Signer, Burns & Goldstone, Los Angeles, Cal., for ap-pellees.
Before CHAMBERS, BARNES and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The order of the district court affirming the referee’s order denying Stein-berg a discharge in bankruptcy is affirmed.
The referee heard the testimony of the bankrupt concerning the inadequacy of his books and his explanation as to the disappearance of money which had been in the bankrupt’s hands. Obviously the referee disbelieved much, or a portion, of the attempted explanation.
We are not persuaded from our review of the record that the referee was mistaken. Thus, we cannot say his determination was clearly erroneous.

Question: What federal agency's decision was reviewed by the court of appeals?

Choices:
Benefits Review Board
Civil Aeronautics Board
Civil Service Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Power Commission
Federal Maritime Commission
Federal Trade Commission
Interstate Commerce Commission
National Labor Relations Board
Atomic Energy Commission
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Securities & Exchange Commission
Other federal agency
Not ascertained or not applicable

Answer: 14