What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine whether or not the first listed respondent is bankrupt. If there is no indication of whether or not the respondent is bankrupt, the respondent is presumed to be not bankrupt.

Opinion:
Joe MORALES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 29562
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Sept. 22, 1970.
Joe Morales, pro se.
Seagal V. Wheatley, U. S. Atty., Reese L. Harrison, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., San Antonio, Tex., for respondent-appellee.
Before GEWIN, GOLDBERG and DYER, Ciircuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th Cir. See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
PER CURIAM:
Morales, represented by counsel, was convicted upon his plea of guilty of two counts of selling heroin not from the original stamped package, in violation of 26 U.S.C.A. § 4704(a). After sentence there was no direct appeal. The District Court denied Morales’ § 2255 motion without an evidentiary hearing.
The sole contention on appeal is that the statute under which Morales was convicted is unconstitutional in light of Leary v. United States, 1969, 395 U.S. 6, 89 S.Ct. 1532, 23 L.Ed.2d 57. But this argument was put to rest by Turner v. United States, 1970, 396 U.S. 398, 90 S.Ct. 642, 24 L.Ed.2d 610, and United States v. Walker, 5 Cir. 1969, 414 F.2d 876.
The appeal is therefore frivolous and is
Dismissed.

Question: Is the first listed respondent bankrupt?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1