What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "sub-state government (e.g., county, local, special district)", specifically "other". Your task is to determine which specific substate government agency best describes this litigant.

Opinion:
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. ROSS GENERAL JEWELERS, Inc., d/b/a Fetter Jewelry Company, Appellee.
No. 13114.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit .
April 25, 1950.
John D. Marsh, Assistant City Attorney, Miami, Fla., J. W. Watson, Jr., City Attorney, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
George C. McCaughan, Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Herbert S. Shapiro, Miami Beach, Fla., Arthur - A. Kimmel, Miami Beach, Fla., Morris Berick, Miami Beach, Fla., amici curiae.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and WALLER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
The issues in this case are in all respects the same ■ as in City of Miami v. Sutton, 5 Cir., 181 F.2d 644. For the reasons there stated, the judgments herein are
Reversed.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "sub-state government (e.g., county, local, special district)", specifically "other". Which specific substate government agency best describes this litigant?

Choices:
City of, county of, etc. - in corporate capacity - criminal case
city of, county of, etc. - in corporate capacity - civil case
Other sub-state activity
not ascertained

Answer: 3