What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify whether the petitioning party (i.e., the plaintiff or the appellant) emerged victorious. The victory the Supreme Court provided the petitioning party may not have been total and complete (e.g., by vacating and remanding the matter rather than an unequivocal reversal), but the disposition is nonetheless a favorable one. Consider that the petitioning party lost if the Supreme Court affirmed or dismissed the case, or denied the petition. Consider that the petitioning party won in part or in full if the Supreme Court reversed, reversed and remanded, vacated and remanded, affirmed and reversed in part, affirmed and reversed in part and remanded, or vacated the case.

Opinion:
January 30, 1956.
No. 13,
Original.
Wisconsin v. Tennessee.
Vernon W. Thomson, Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of Wisconsin, plaintiff. With him on the brief were Stewart O. Honeck, Deputy Attorney General, and Roy G. Tulane and George F. Sieker, Assistant Attorneys General. Knox Bigham, Assistant Attorney General, argued the cause for the State of Tennessee, defendant. With him on the brief were George F. McCanless, Attorney General, Allison B. Humphreys, Jr., Solicitor General, and James M. Glasgow, Assistant Attorney General.
On motion for leave to file complaint. Argued January 23,1956. Decided January 30, 1956.
Per Curiam:
The motion for leave to file the complaint is denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

Question: Consider that the petitioning party lost if the Supreme Court affirmed or dismissed the case, or denied the petition. Consider that the petitioning party won in part or in full if the Supreme Court reversed, reversed and remanded, vacated and remanded, affirmed and reversed in part, affirmed and reversed in part and remanded, or vacated the case. Did the petitioning win the case?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1