What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court).

Opinion:
Daniel ELCHUK, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
No. 18932.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Dec. 11, 1962.
Milas C. Bradford, Jr., Houston, Tex., for appellant.
Robert A. Hall, Robert C. Maley, Jr., Asst. U. S. Attys., Houston, Tex., for appellee.
Before HUTCHESON, WISDOM and GEWIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
When this case was last here, the judgment appealed from was affirmed. Pursuant to the mandate of the Supreme Court, this judgment of affirmance was, upon the suggestion of the Solicitor General, vacated, and the cause was remanded to this court “for further proceedings in which the petitioner is to be accorded the opportunity to present oral argument on the merits ' of his appeal, either personally or through counsel, to the same extent as such opportunity is accorded to the United States Attorney”, a procedure which has been the uniform practice of this court for the last thirty years.
Upon such re-submission, this court, being well advised in the premises, determined, as it had before determined, that the judgment appealed from should be affirmed, and it is accordingly so ordered.
. Elchuk v. United States, 5 Cir., 296 F.2d 723.

Question: What is the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court)?

Choices:
Trial (either jury or bench trial)
Injunction or denial of injunction or stay of injunction
Summary judgment or denial of summary judgment
Guilty plea or denial of motion to withdraw plea
Dismissal (include dismissal of petition for habeas corpus)
Appeals of post judgment orders (e.g., attorneys' fees, costs, damages, JNOV - judgment nothwithstanding the verdict)
Appeal of post settlement orders
Not a final judgment: interlocutory appeal
Not a final judgment: mandamus
Other (e.g., pre-trial orders, rulings on motions, directed verdicts) or could not determine nature of final judgment
Does not fit any of the above categories, but opinion mentions a "trial judge"
Not applicable (e.g., decision below was by a federal administrative agency, tax court)

Answer: 9