What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine or not there was any amicus participation before the court of appeals.

Opinion:
CITY OF MIAMI, Appellant, v. ROSS GENERAL JEWELERS, Inc., d/b/a Fetter Jewelry Company, Appellee.
No. 13114.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit .
April 25, 1950.
John D. Marsh, Assistant City Attorney, Miami, Fla., J. W. Watson, Jr., City Attorney, Miami, Fla., for appellant.
George C. McCaughan, Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Herbert S. Shapiro, Miami Beach, Fla., Arthur - A. Kimmel, Miami Beach, Fla., Morris Berick, Miami Beach, Fla., amici curiae.
Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and WALLER and RUSSELL, Circuit Judges.
RUSSELL, Circuit Judge.
The issues in this case are in all respects the same ■ as in City of Miami v. Sutton, 5 Cir., 181 F.2d 644. For the reasons there stated, the judgments herein are
Reversed.

Question: Was there any amicus participation before the court of appeals?

Choices:
no amicus participation on either side
1 separate amicus brief was filed
2 separate amicus briefs were filed
3 separate amicus briefs were filed
4 separate amicus briefs were filed
5 separate amicus briefs were filed
6 separate amicus briefs were filed
7 separate amicus briefs were filed
8 or more separate amicus briefs were filed
not ascertained

Answer: 1