What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Your task is to determine the disposition by the court of appeals of the decision of the court or agency below; i.e., how the decision below is "treated" by the appeals court. That is, the basic outcome of the case for the litigants, indicating whether the appellant or respondent "won" in the court of appeals.

Opinion:
George N. ALLEN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. B.J. BUNNELL, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 88-6305.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
May 1, 1990.
Before SCHROEDER and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and KING , District Judge.
The Honorable Samuel P. King, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Hawaii, sitting by designation.
ORDER
The government has filed a “petition for rehearing” calling our attention to the Supreme Court’s decision in Teague v. Lane, 489 U.S. 288, 109 S.Ct. 1060, 1075, 103 L.Ed.2d 334 (1989) which appears to apply an even stricter test of retroactivity than that set forth in Allen v. Hardy, 478 U.S. 255, 258, 106 S.Ct. 2878, 2879-2880, 92 L.Ed.2d 199 (1986). The result in this case would thus be the same under the Teague analysis. The petition for rehearing is denied.

Question: What is the disposition by the court of appeals of the decision of the court or agency below?

Choices:
stay, petition, or motion granted
affirmed; or affirmed and petition denied
reversed (include reversed & vacated)
reversed and remanded (or just remanded)
vacated and remanded (also set aside & remanded; modified and remanded)
affirmed in part and reversed in part (or modified or affirmed and modified)
affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded; affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded
vacated
petition denied or appeal dismissed
certification to another court
not ascertained

Answer: 8