What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify the manner in which the Court took jurisdiction. The Court uses a variety of means whereby it undertakes to consider cases that it has been petitioned to review. The most important ones are the writ of certiorari, the writ of appeal, and for legacy cases the writ of error, appeal, and certification. For cases that fall into more than one category, identify the manner in which the court takes jurisdiction on the basis of the writ. For example, Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803), an original jurisdiction and a mandamus case, should be coded as mandamus rather than original jurisdiction due to the nature of the writ. Some legacy cases are "original" motions or requests for the Court to take jurisdiction but were heard or filed in another court. For example, Ex parte Matthew Addy S.S. & Commerce Corp., 256 U.S. 417 (1921) asked the Court to issue a writ of mandamus to a federal judge. Do not code these cases as "original" jurisdiction cases but rather on the basis of the writ.

Opinion:
October 25, 1948.
No. 11.
Doubleday & Co., Inc. v. New York.
Argued October 21, 1948.
Decided October 25, 1948.
Whitney North Seymour argued the cause for appellant.
With him on the brief was George G. Gallantz. Whitman Knapp argued the cause for appellee.
With him on the brief was Frank S. Hogan. Kenneth W. Greenawalt filed a brief for the American Civil Liberties Union, as amicus curiae, urging reversal.
Per Cu-riam:
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Question: What is the manner in which the Court took jurisdiction?

Choices:
cert
appeal
bail
certification
docketing fee
rehearing or restored to calendar for reargument
injunction
mandamus
original
prohibition
stay
writ of error
writ of habeas corpus
unspecified, other

Answer: 1