What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous", specifically "fiduciary, executor, or trustee". Your task is to determine which of the following specific subcategories best describes the litigant.

Opinion:
David C. PARKER, d/b/a Royal Professional Cleaners & Laundry, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LAUNDRY, DRY CLEANING & DYE HOUSE WORKERS UNION LOCAL 218, et al., Defendants, Josephine B. Crawley, Fred Lee Debardeleben, Loretta Speight, Sophronia Fells and Martha Shelton, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 74-2626.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Aug. 15, 1975.
Caryl P. Privett, U. W. Clemon, Birmingham, Ala., for defendants-appellants.
Robert F. Childs, Jr., C. V. Stelzenmuller, Birmingham, Ala., for plaintiff-appellee.
Donald L. Newsom, Birmingham, Ala., Joseph Jacobs, Atlanta, Ga., for Laundry, Etc., Union, Local 218.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and WISDOM and COLEMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
It appearing that all the parties agree that matters giving rise to this appeal are moot on the basis of uncontested affidavits, the judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded with direction to dismiss the proceeding as being moot. United States v. Munsingwear, Inc., 1950, 340 U.S. 36, 71 S.Ct. 104, 95 L.Ed. 36; Gooden v. Mississippi State University, 5 Cir., 1974, 499 F.2d 441, 443-44; Reynolds v. Kelley, 5 Cir., 1973, 487 F.2d 1331; Troy State University v. Dickey, 5 Cir., 1968, 402 F.2d 515, 516-17; Lebus, Regional Director v. Seafarers’ Int’l Union, 5 Cir., 1968, 398 F.2d 281, 283.
Vacated and remanded with directions.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous", specifically "fiduciary, executor, or trustee". Which of the following specific subcategories best describes the litigant?

Choices:
trustee in bankruptcy - institution
trustee in bankruptcy - individual
executor or administrator of estate - institution
executor or administrator of estate - individual
trustees of private and charitable trusts - institution
trustee of private and charitable trust - individual
conservators, guardians and court appointed trustees for minors, mentally incompetent
other fiduciary or trustee
specific subcategory not ascertained

Answer: 3