What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify whether the court opinion mentions that one or more of the members of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed dissented. Focus on whether there exists any statement to this effect in the opinion, for example "divided," "dissented," "disagreed," "split.". A reference, without more, to the "majority" or "plurality" does not necessarily evidence dissent (the other judges may have concurred). If a case arose on habeas corpus, indicate dissent if either the last federal court or the last state court to review the case contained one. If the highest court with jurisdiction to hear the case declines to do so by a divided vote, indicate dissent. If the lower court denies an en banc petition by a divided vote and the Supreme Court discusses same, indicate dissent.

Opinion:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al. v. TRI COUNTY INDUSTRIES, INC.
No. 99-1953.
Argued January 10, 2001
Decided January 17, 2001
Charles L. Reisckel, Deputy Corporation Counsel for the District of Columbia, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the briefs were Robert R. Rigsby, Corporation Counsel, and Donna M. Mur ashy, Senior Assistant Corporation Counsel.
Frank J. Emig argued the cause and filed a brief for respondent.
Jeffrey Robert White and Frederick M. Baron filed a brief for the Association of Trial Lawyers of America as amicus curiae urging affirmance.
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently • granted.

Question: Does the court opinion mention that one or more of the members of the court whose decision the Supreme Court reviewed dissented?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 1