What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous", specifically "fiduciary, executor, or trustee". Your task is to determine which of the following specific subcategories best describes the litigant.

Opinion:
In re HAMILTON. POSTEL v. BROADWAY TRUST CO.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
November 23, 1928.
No. 4037.
David E. Keefe, of East St. Louis, Ill., for appellant.
Dan McGlynn, of East St. Louis, Ill., for appellee.
Before ALSCHULER, PAGE, and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges.
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
The Broadway Trust Company, of St. Louis, Missouri, recovered a judgment against J. A. Hamilton on April 25, 1927. On August 26, 1927, an involuntary petition in bankruptcy was filed against Hamilton. The question is, Was the judgment obtained “within four months before the filing of the petition”?
The general rule in computing time is to exclude the first day and include the last. This is the rule of the Bankruptcy Act whenever the time is enumerated by days. Section 31a (11 USCA § 54). It has been held that the rule of computation stated in section 31 as to days should be applied when the time is limited by months or years. In re De Lewandowski (D. C.) 243 F. 787, and cases cited.
In Dutcher v. Wright, 94 U. S. 553, 24 L. Ed. 130, the court had before it the question whether the act of bankruptcy (the assignment of the notes, accounts, and property of the alleged bankrupt) occurred within four months before the filing of the petition in bankruptcy. The assignment was made on the 8th day of December, 1869, and the petition was filed on the 8th day of April, 1870. The court held that the day the petition in bankruptcy was filed must be excluded in making the computation, and that the aet of bankruptcy was within the four months.
In the. ease at bar, to ascertain whether the judgment was taken within four months before the filing of the petition, we must exclude the day of the petition and count backward toward the day of the judgment. This must be the method whenever the computation is of time before a certain event. Both parties here agree that this is the proper procedure. Applying this method, excluding August 26 and counting backward, we find August 25 is the last day of the first month, that July 25 is the last day of the second month, that June 25 is the last day of the third month, that May 25 is the last day of the fourth month, .and that April 25 is the last day of the fifth month before the day the petition was filed. Therefore April 25 is not within four months before August 26.
In. some of the eases called to our notice this test was applied: If the judgment, attachment, or assignment be taken on the day whose number in the month corresponds to that of the day on which the petition is filed, it is within the four months. The judgment in the case at bar was taken the day before the day whose number corresponds to that of the day the petition was filed, and therefore was not within the four months.
Judgment affirmed.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous", specifically "fiduciary, executor, or trustee". Which of the following specific subcategories best describes the litigant?

Choices:
trustee in bankruptcy - institution
trustee in bankruptcy - individual
executor or administrator of estate - institution
executor or administrator of estate - individual
trustees of private and charitable trusts - institution
trustee of private and charitable trust - individual
conservators, guardians and court appointed trustees for minors, mentally incompetent
other fiduciary or trustee
specific subcategory not ascertained

Answer: 0