What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify the reason, if any, given by the court for granting the petition for certiorari.

Opinion:
PEREZ v. CALIFORNIA.
No. 39.
Argued November 14, 1968.
Decided May 26, 1969.
Peter G. Fetros, by appointment of the Court, 393 U. S. 812, argued the cause and filed a brief for petitioner.
Edsel W. Haws, Deputy Attorney General of California, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Thomas C. Lynch, Attorney General, and Doris H. Maier, Assistant Attorney General.
Per Curiam.
The writ is dismissed as improvidently granted.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents from the dismissal of the writ.

Question: What reason, if any, does the court give for granting the petition for certiorari?

Choices:
case did not arise on cert or cert not granted
federal court conflict
federal court conflict and to resolve important or significant question
putative conflict
conflict between federal court and state court
state court conflict
federal court confusion or uncertainty
state court confusion or uncertainty
federal court and state court confusion or uncertainty
to resolve important or significant question
to resolve question presented
no reason given
other reason

Answer: 11