What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "unclear". Your task is to determine what subcategory of business best describes this litigant.

Opinion:
RAWLEIGH, MOSES & CO., INC., a corporation, Appellant, v. Herbert MARTIN, Jr., and William Leo McNeil, Appellees.
No. 74-1486.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 7, 1975.
Decided Jan. 13, 1975.
David K. Breed, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.
Claude W. McElwee, Jr., St. Louis, Mo., for appellees.
Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, and HEANEY and ROSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Upon a careful consideration of the record, the briefs and the oral arguments of the parties, the Court has concluded that the judgment of the district court is based upon findings that are not clearly erroneous, that no error of law appears and that an opinion by this Court would have no precedential value. For these reasons the judgment appealed from is hereby affirmed on the basis of the opinion of the trial court. Rawleigh, Moses & Co. v. Martin, 376 F.Supp. 107 (E.D. Mo.1974). See Rule 14 of the Rules of this Court.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "private business (including criminal enterprises)", specifically "unclear". What subcategory of business best describes this litigant?

Choices:
auto industry
chemical industry
drug industry
food industry
oil & gas industry
clothing & textile industry
electronic industry
alcohol and tobacco industry
other
unclear

Answer: 9