What follows is an opinion from the Supreme Court of the United States. Your task is to identify the disposition of the case, that is, the treatment the Supreme Court accorded the court whose decision it reviewed. The information relevant to this variable may be found near the end of the summary that begins on the title page of each case, or preferably at the very end of the opinion of the Court. For cases in which the Court granted a motion to dismiss, consider "petition denied or appeal dismissed". There is "no disposition" if the Court denied a motion to dismiss.

Opinion:
TOLENTINO v. NEW YORK
No. 09-11556.
Argued March 21, 2011 —
Decided March 29, 2011
Kristina Schwarz argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs were Steven Banks, Andrew C. Fine, Lawrence T Hausman, and Richard Joselson.
Caitlin J. Halligan argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Hilary Hassler, Alan B. Gadlin, Eleanor J. Ostrow, and Allen J. Vickey.
Pratik A. Shah argued the cause for the United States as amicus curiae urging affirmance. With him on the brief were Acting Solicitor General Katyal, Assistant Attorney General Breuer, Deputy Solicitor General Dreeben, and Scott A. C. Meisler
Marc Rotenberg filed a brief for the Electronic Privacy Information Center et al. as amici curiae urging reversal.
Briefs of amici curiae urging affirmance were filed for the State of Massachusetts et al. by Martha Coakley, Attorney General of Massachusetts, and Randall E. Ravitz, Assistant Attorney General, by William H. Ryan, Jr., Acting Attorney General of Pennsylvania, and by the Attorneys General for their respective States as follows: Luther Strange of Alabama, John J. Burns of Alaska, John Suthers of Colorado, Joseph R. Biden III of Delaware, Pamela Jo Bondi of Florida, David M. Louie of Hawaii, Lawrence G. Wasden of Idaho, Gregory F. Zoeller of Indiana, James D. “Buddy” Caldwell of Louisiana, Douglas F. Gansler of Maryland, Chris Roster of Missouri, Steve Bullock of Montana, Jon Bruning of Nebraska, Catherine Cortez Masto of Nevada, Paula T. Dow of New Jersey, Gary K. King of New Mexico, E. Scott Pruitt of Oklahoma, Alan Wilson of South Carolina, Marty J Jackley of South Dakota, Greg Abbott of Texas, Mark L. Shurtleff of Utah, Kenneth T. Cuccineüi II of Virginia, J. B. Van Bollen of Wisconsin, and Bruce A. Salzburg of Wyoming; for the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation by Kent S. Scheidegger; and for the New York State Association of Chiefs of Police, Inc., et al. by Meir Feder.
Per Curiam.
The writ of certiorari is dismissed as improvidently granted.
It is so ordered.

Question: What is the disposition of the case, that is, the treatment the Supreme Court accorded the court whose decision it reviewed?

Choices:
stay, petition, or motion granted
affirmed (includes modified)
reversed
reversed and remanded
vacated and remanded
affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part
affirmed and reversed (or vacated) in part and remanded
vacated
petition denied or appeal dismissed
certification to or from a lower court
no disposition

Answer: 8