What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the federal agency (if any) whose decision was reviewed by the court of appeals. If there was no prior agency action, choose "not applicable".

Opinion:
Edward SILVER et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant in Error.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
June 24, 1926.)
No. 3416.
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey; John Rellstab, Judge.
Carl Kisselman, of Camden, N. J., for plaintiffs in error.
Walter G. Winne, of Hackensack, N. J., for the United States.
Before BUFFINGTON and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and THOMSON, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This case turns on the question whether certain articles here involved were designed for use in the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor.
This court being of opinion the evidence did not warrant such finding, the order of the court below, denying a return of said articles, is reversed.

Question: What federal agency's decision was reviewed by the court of appeals?

Choices:
Benefits Review Board
Civil Aeronautics Board
Civil Service Commission
Federal Communications Commission
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Federal Power Commission
Federal Maritime Commission
Federal Trade Commission
Interstate Commerce Commission
National Labor Relations Board
Atomic Energy Commission
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Securities & Exchange Commission
Other federal agency
Not ascertained or not applicable

Answer: 14