What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "federal government (including DC)". Your task is to determine which category of federal government agencies and activities best describes this litigant.

Opinion:
UNITED STATES v. BUCKMAN.
No. 10557.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Jan. 11, 1952.
Decided March 14, 1952.
Charles A. Stanziale, Newark, N. J., for appellant.
Stanley E. Rutkowski, Asst. U. S. Atty., Trenton, N. J. (Grover C. Richman, Jr., U. S. Atty., Newark, N. J., Stuart B. Rounds, Asst. U. S. Atty., Trenton, N. J., on the brief), for appellee.
Before GOODRICH and HASTIE, Circuit Judges and BURNS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The defendant was convicted on two counts of a three count indictment for violation of the statute providing punishment for knowingly passing or concealing counterfeit money. 18 U.S.C. § 472(Supp.l951). There was adequate evidence to convict. We have fully examined the record. Our conclusion is that there were no errors of sufficient gravity to be the basis for upsetting the jury’s verdict and the judgment thereon.
The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "federal government (including DC)". Which category of federal government agencies and activities best describes this litigant?

Choices:
cabinet level department
courts or legislative
agency whose first word is "federal"
other agency, beginning with "A" thru "E"
other agency, beginning with "F" thru "N"
other agency, beginning with "O" thru "R"
other agency, beginning with "S" thru "Z"
Distric of Columbia
other, not listed, not able to classify

Answer: 8