What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous". Your task is to determine which of the following categories best describes the litigant.

Opinion:
The OHIO MASONIC HOME, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent.
No. 74-1640.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
Feb. 25, 1975.
Hugh Barnett, Martin, Browne, Hull & Harper, Springfield, Ohio, for petitioner.
Elliott Moore, Sandra McCandless, Associate Gen. Counsel, N. L. R. B., Joseph E. Mayer, Peter G. Nash, John S. Irving, Jr., Patrick H. Hardin, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before PECK and MILLER, Circuit Judges, and HERMANSDORFER, District Judge.
Honorable Howard David Hermansdorfer, United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, sitting by designation.
ORDER
This order is before the Court upon a petition of The Ohio Masonic Home to review an order of the National Labor Relations Board and upon the cross-petition of the Board to enforce the order. The decision and order of the Board are reported at 205 NLRB No. 65.
Being fully advised in the premises, the Court concludes that the findings of fact of the Board are supported by substantial evidence on the record considered as a whole, and therefore,
It is ordered that the order of the National Labor Relations Board be and it hereby is enforced.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous". Which of the following categories best describes the litigant?

Choices:
fiduciary, executor, or trustee
other
nature of the litigant not ascertained

Answer: 1