What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
Your task is to determine whether or not the first listed respondent is bankrupt. If there is no indication of whether or not the respondent is bankrupt, the respondent is presumed to be not bankrupt.

Opinion:
J. F. GALLEGLY, Appellant, v. P. B. WHITE, Trustee in Bankruptcy for General Mower Corporation, Appellee.
No. 9416.
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit.
Argued June 19, 1964.
Decided June 24, 1964.
Howard I. Legum, Norfolk, Va. (Fine, Fine, Legum, Schwan & Fine, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellant.
Kenneth H. Lambert, Jr., Norfolk, Va. (Williams, Cocke, Worrell & Kelly and Thomas R. McNamara, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellee.
Before SOBELOFF, Chief Judge, HAYNSWORTH, Circuit Judge, and MICHIE, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
The plaintiff in this tort action has appealed from an adverse judgment entered upon a verdict of a jury for the defendant. The plaintiff objects to the admission of certain evidence into the case and to the Court’s charge. We find in the entire trial, however, no error affecting any substantial right of the plaintiff.
Affirmed.

Question: Is the first listed respondent bankrupt?

Choices:
Yes
No

Answer: 0