What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous". Your task is to determine which of the following categories best describes the litigant.

Opinion:
Harvey IVY, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert H. FINCH, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 19739.
United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.
April 16, 1970.
Emanuel Nadlin, Dayton, Ohio, for appellant.
James C. Hair, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., William D. Ruckelshaus, Asst. Atty. Gen., Kathryn H. Baldwin, Atty., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Roger J. Makley, U. S. Atty., Dayton, Ohio, on the brief, for appellee.
Before WEICK, PECK and BROOKS, Circuit Judges.
ORDER
This matter came on to be considered on appeal from a judgment of the District Court granting the motion of the defendant-appellee for summary judgment, and it appearing that there is substantial evidence in the record to sustain the findings of the defendant-appellee and that his determination is not clearly erroneous,
It is ordered that the judgment of the District Court be and it hereby is affirmed.

Question: This question concerns the first listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "miscellaneous". Which of the following categories best describes the litigant?

Choices:
fiduciary, executor, or trustee
other
nature of the litigant not ascertained

Answer: 1