What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court).

Opinion:
AMANA REFRIGERATION, INC., Appellee, v. A. W. SCHMIDT TRANSFER, Appellant. AMANA REFRIGERATION, INC., Appellee, v. BRUCE MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., Appellant. PENICK & FORD, LIMITED, Appellee, v. ADMIRAL MERCHANTS MOTOR FREIGHT, INC., et al., Appellants. LeFEBURE CORPORATION, Appellee, v. BRUCE MOTOR FREIGHT, INCORPORATED, et al., Appellants. PENICK & FORD, LIMITED, Appellee, v. PACIFIC INTERMOUNTAIN EXPRESS CO., Appellant.
Nos. 73-1507 to 73-1510, and 73-1683.
United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 11, 1974.
Decided July 29, 1974.
Rehearings Denied Aug. 21, 1974.
Arthur R. Hauver, Denver, Colo., for appellants.
Edwin E. Huddleson, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Appellate Section, Washington, D.C., for United States.
Robert B. Ward, Cedar Rapids, Iowa, for Amana.
John C. Noonan, Kansas City, Mo., for Western Electric.
James F. McGovern, St. Paul, Minn., for Land O’Lakes.
Don M. Jackson, Kansas City, Mo., for Proctor & Gamble.
Before HEANEY and BRIGHT, Circuit Judges, and WANGELIN, District Judge.
H. KENNETH WANGEUN, District Judge, Eastern District of Missouri, sitting by designation.
HEANEY, Circuit Judge.
These are consolidated appeals by the defendant motor carriers from summary judgments entered in favor of the plaintiff shippers.
The carriers in these cases raise substantially the same issues as were raised in Proctor and Gamble Distributing Co. v. Ideal Truck Lines, Inc., 501 F.2d 928 (8 Cir., filed this date). We affirm the judgments of the District Court for the reasons set forth in that opinion. Although the District Court awarded interest from October 12, 1971, a date later than was approved in Proctor and Gamble, the shippers have not raised this issue on appeal, and we affirm the District Court.
Costs on appeal shall be taxed to the appellants.
The appellees’ request for attorneys’ fees on appeal is denied.
Affirmed.

Question: What is the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court)?

Choices:
Trial (either jury or bench trial)
Injunction or denial of injunction or stay of injunction
Summary judgment or denial of summary judgment
Guilty plea or denial of motion to withdraw plea
Dismissal (include dismissal of petition for habeas corpus)
Appeals of post judgment orders (e.g., attorneys' fees, costs, damages, JNOV - judgment nothwithstanding the verdict)
Appeal of post settlement orders
Not a final judgment: interlocutory appeal
Not a final judgment: mandamus
Other (e.g., pre-trial orders, rulings on motions, directed verdicts) or could not determine nature of final judgment
Does not fit any of the above categories, but opinion mentions a "trial judge"
Not applicable (e.g., decision below was by a federal administrative agency, tax court)

Answer: 2