What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court).

Opinion:
Albert WUELFING, Appellant, v. SEARS-ROEBUCK & COMPANY, Appellee.
No. 13899.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Argued May 7, 1970.
Decided June 10, 1970.
Clyde C. Randolph, Jr., Winston-Salem, N. C. (Doris G. Randolph, and Randolph & Randolph, Winston-Salem, N. C., on the brief), for appellant.
Allan R. Gitter, Winston-Salem, N. C. (Eddie C. Mitchell and Womble, Carlyle, Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, N. C., on the brief), for appellee.
Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, BUTZNER, Circuit Judge, and RUSSELL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
After consideration of the briefs and oral argument, we conclude that the submission of this tort case to the jury was fair and complete, and that there is no basis for setting aside the judgment entered upon the jury’s verdict for the defendant.
Affirmed.

Question: What is the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court)?

Choices:
Trial (either jury or bench trial)
Injunction or denial of injunction or stay of injunction
Summary judgment or denial of summary judgment
Guilty plea or denial of motion to withdraw plea
Dismissal (include dismissal of petition for habeas corpus)
Appeals of post judgment orders (e.g., attorneys' fees, costs, damages, JNOV - judgment nothwithstanding the verdict)
Appeal of post settlement orders
Not a final judgment: interlocutory appeal
Not a final judgment: mandamus
Other (e.g., pre-trial orders, rulings on motions, directed verdicts) or could not determine nature of final judgment
Does not fit any of the above categories, but opinion mentions a "trial judge"
Not applicable (e.g., decision below was by a federal administrative agency, tax court)

Answer: 9