What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals. Your task is to identify the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court).

Opinion:
MIKESKA v. UNITED STATES et al.
No. 9708.
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.
Argued Oct. 8, 1948.
Decided Nov. 22, 1948.
Mr. Warren E. Miller, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. David S. Allshouse, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. John W. Pehle, of Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Lawrence S. Lesser of Washington D. C., was on the brief, for appellee Joe M. Mikeska.
Messrs. D. Vance Swann, Atty., Dept, of Justice, George Morris Fay, U. S. Atty. and Sidney S. Sachs and Thomas E. Walsh, Asst. U. S. Attys., all of Washington, D. C., entered appearances for appellee, United States of America.
Before EDGERTON, CLARK and WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The case must be affirmed. The only questions involved are the intention of the insured soldier and whether or not he took such steps to effectuate his intention to change the beneficiary of his policy (if he had any such intention) as reasonably might be expected under the circumstances. We find nothing in the record to cause us to disturb the decision of Judge Letts based upon his findings of fact and conclusions of law, which we therefore adopt
Affirmed.

Question: What is the type of district court decision or judgment appealed from (i.e., the nature of the decision below in the district court)?

Choices:
Trial (either jury or bench trial)
Injunction or denial of injunction or stay of injunction
Summary judgment or denial of summary judgment
Guilty plea or denial of motion to withdraw plea
Dismissal (include dismissal of petition for habeas corpus)
Appeals of post judgment orders (e.g., attorneys' fees, costs, damages, JNOV - judgment nothwithstanding the verdict)
Appeal of post settlement orders
Not a final judgment: interlocutory appeal
Not a final judgment: mandamus
Other (e.g., pre-trial orders, rulings on motions, directed verdicts) or could not determine nature of final judgment
Does not fit any of the above categories, but opinion mentions a "trial judge"
Not applicable (e.g., decision below was by a federal administrative agency, tax court)

Answer: 0