What follows is an opinion from a United States Court of Appeals.
Intervenors who participated as parties at the courts of appeals should be counted as either appellants or respondents when it can be determined whose position they supported. For example, if there were two plaintiffs who lost in district court, appealed, and were joined by four intervenors who also asked the court of appeals to reverse the district court, the number of appellants should be coded as six.
When coding the detailed nature of participants, use your personal knowledge about the participants, if you are completely confident of the accuracy of your knowledge, even if the specific information is not in the opinion. For example, if "IBM" is listed as the appellant it could be classified as "clearly national or international in scope" even if the opinion did not indicate the scope of the business. 

Your task concerns the second listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "sub-state government (e.g., county, local, special district)". Your task is to determine which category of substate government best describes this litigant.

Opinion:
H. B. GOLDSMITH, next friend of Byron Lance Goldsmith, a minor, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. QUITMAN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT et al., Defendants-Appellants.
No. 72-1255
Summary Calendar.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
June 12, 1972.
Welby K. Parish, Gilmer, Tex., for defendants-appellants.
Ken T. Miller, Jr., Tyler, Tex., for plaintiffs-appellees.
Before THORNBERRY, COLEMAN and INGRAHAM, Circuit Judges.
Rule 18, 5th Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal involves the “Boy’s Dress and Hair Code” of the Quitman Independent School District. The District Court enjoined the enforcement of the Regulation.
The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with Karr v. Schmidt, 5 Cir., 1972, 460 F.2d 609 (En Banc).
Vacated and remanded with direction.

Question: This question concerns the second listed appellant. The nature of this litigant falls into the category "sub-state government (e.g., county, local, special district)". Which category of substate government best describes this litigant?

Choices:
legislative
executive/administrative
bureaucracy providing services
bureaucracy in charge of regulation
bureaucracy in charge of general administration
judicial
other

Answer: 0