Patent Document

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION  
       [0001]    This claims the benefit of copending, commonly-assigned U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/099,848, filed Sep. 24, 2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. 
     
    
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION  
       [0002]    This relates to the testing of a peripheral device associated with an electronic device. 
         [0003]    Many kinds of portable electronic devices include processors or systems-on-a-chip (SOCs) that communicate with peripheral components such as memory, displays, or various transducers. In the assembly of such electronic devices, the various components normally will have been tested individually in advance, but it is nevertheless important to test the communications between the components of the assembled devices. 
         [0004]    Such testing normally includes the transmission of a test pattern to the peripheral device. The peripheral device compares the pattern as received to the known pattern it is expecting to receive, to determine the bit error rate. There are several ways that the receiver in the peripheral device can know what pattern to expect. One way is to simply send a predetermined pattern, of which one of the simplest examples is a pattern of alternating 1&#39;s and 0&#39;s. However, such a pattern is more susceptible to corruption than a more random pattern. Therefore, the bit error rate tester in the receiver of the peripheral device operates better with a more random data pattern. 
       SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION  
       [0005]    Where a random data pattern is used for test purposes, the test pattern to be compared cannot be sent to the peripheral device in advance. Therefore, it must be generated locally, at the peripheral device, using the same pattern generation rule that is used at the transmitter to send the test pattern. 
         [0006]    The present invention provides for the generation of identical random, or pseudorandom, test patterns in a peripheral device (“receiver”) to be tested, and in a transmitter that sends the test pattern to the receiver, by using pattern generation circuitry in both the transmitter and the receiver that operates identically and requires a pattern input value, or seed. The same seed value is input to both the transmitter and the receiver. For example, the seed value can be provided to the receiver off-line, before testing begins. 
         [0007]    In a first variant of a first embodiment, the pattern generation circuitry can be a linear-feedback shift register, which generates pseudorandom numbers. If identical linear-feedback shift registers are provided in both the transmitter and the receiver, and both linear-feedback shift registers take the output of the same feedback register tap as their respective outputs, then both linear-feedback shift registers will provide the same pseudorandom pattern. 
         [0008]    Because the pattern of a linear-feedback shift register is not truly random, but only pseudorandom, the pattern will repeat every 2 n  cycles, where n is the length of the linear-feedback shift register in bits. Therefore in a second variant of the first embodiment, the pattern generation circuitry is reseeded periodically. In one variant of this embodiment, the new seed is an output of the linear-feedback shift register itself. For example, it can be predetermined that every mth output of the linear-feedback shift register (m≦n) will be used as a new seed. In another variant of this embodiment, a second linear-feedback shift register is provided whose output is used to determine the new seed for the first linear-feedback shift register. 
         [0009]    In a second embodiment, identical cryptographic modules are used in the transmitter and the receiver to generate the test pattern. Identical keys may be provided to the cryptographic modules in a manner similar to the provision of the seed in the foregoing linear-feedback shift register embodiments. 
         [0010]    Therefore, in accordance with embodiments of the invention, there is provided a system including a peripheral component of an electronic device, the peripheral component having a driver including testing circuitry. The testing circuitry includes receiver pattern circuitry for generating a varying receiver test pattern based on a receiver pattern input value. The system also includes apparatus for testing the peripheral component, which apparatus includes transmitter pattern circuitry for generating a varying transmitter test pattern, and circuitry for sending the transmitter test pattern to the testing circuitry. The receiver pattern circuitry and the transmitter pattern circuitry operate identically, such that the receiver test pattern and the transmitter test pattern are identical when the receiver pattern input value and the transmitter pattern input value are identical. The system further includes input circuitry for inputting a seed value as both the receiver pattern input value and the transmitter pattern input value, and comparator circuitry in the testing circuitry that compares the transmitter test pattern received from the testing apparatus to the receiver test pattern. 
         [0011]    A peripheral component for such a system, including testing circuitry as described, and a testing method using such testing circuitry, also are provided. 
     
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
         [0012]    Further features of the invention, its nature and various advantages, will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which: 
           [0013]      FIG. 1  is a diagram of a testing arrangement for a peripheral component of an electronic device, using testing circuitry in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and 
           [0014]      FIG. 2  is a diagram of a testing arrangement for a peripheral component of an electronic device, using testing circuitry in accordance with another embodiment of the present invention. 
       
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION  
       [0015]    A peripheral component may be designed to communicate with its host processor using a serial protocol may be tested by a testing apparatus operating under that protocol. In the embodiments described herein, the Mobile Industry Processor Interface (MIPI) protocol, administered by the Mobile Industry Processor Interface Alliance, is an example of such a serial protocol. 
         [0016]    The invention may be described with reference to  FIGS. 1-2 , which describe, as an example, the testing, using the MIPI protocol, of a display module (e.g., a liquid-crystal display (LCD) module) used in a portable device that operates under the MIPI protocol. It will be recognized, however, that references to an LCD module and to the MIPI protocol are exemplary only. 
         [0017]    As seen in  FIG. 1 , in one embodiment of a testing system  10  according to the invention device  100  includes testing circuitry to test display module  101 , which may be an LCD panel. Device  100  includes, in addition to display module  101 , a processor (not shown) and a high-speed serial interface (HSSI) receiver  104  such as a MIPI interface receiver. Video signals received by MIPI interface receiver  104  may be buffered into line buffer  102  (which may be part of a larger display driver circuit (not shown)), before being passed to display module  101  via line  103 . Use of a serial interface allows, for example, the reduction of the number of wires/pins needed to transmit RGB video data to display  101  from  24  wires (eight bits for each of the three color signals) to six wires. 
         [0018]    Testing system  10  may also include a testing module  110  which may send a test pattern or series of test patterns to device  100  via serial link  120 , using a high-speed serial interface transmitter  114  compatible with high-speed serial interface receiver  104  (e.g., a MIPI interface transmitter). The test pattern received by device  100  may be compared in comparator  105  to an expected pattern, and the results (e.g., the number of errors divided by the number of comparisons) of the comparison reported by serial transmitter  106  over serial link  130 . Serial transmitter  106  preferably operates under the MIPI protocol as well, but may operate in the MIPI low-power, or LP, mode, which is slower than the standard MIPI mode, resembling standard CMOS signaling, and may be less prone to errors. The error report may be received by a receiver  116  in testing module  110  at output at  126  for review. 
         [0019]    As discussed above, the expected test pattern that is compared by comparator  105  to the received test pattern should be identical to the received test pattern. This may be achieved by having receiver test pattern generation circuitry  107  in device  100  and transmitter pattern generation circuitry  117  in testing module  110  that operate identically. In order to provide more robust test conditions, the test patterns should be as random, or in practice pseudo-random, as possible. 
         [0020]    In one embodiment, this may be accomplished by providing identical linear-feedback shift registers  108 ,  118  in device  100  and testing module  110 , respectively. An initial seed value may be preloaded into register  121  in testing module  110  and may be uploaded from there to device  100  via link  122 , which preferably is a MIPI LP mode link which, as set forth above, is less prone to error, thereby increasing the likelihood that the seed value will not be corrupted in transmission to register  109  of device  100 . Although link  122  and its transmitter  123  (in testing module  110 ) and receiver  124  (in device  100 ) are shown as being separate from link  130 , it may be the same link. 
         [0021]    Testing system  10  may thus be initially seeded, and will produce sufficiently random patterns for testing. The pattern will be produced at transmitter pattern generation circuitry  117  in testing module  110  and sent to device  100  for testing. Because receiver test pattern generation circuitry  107  in device  100  operates identically to transmitter pattern generation circuitry  117  in testing module  110 , and is identically seeded, in the absence of error the two inputs to comparator  105  should be identical and therefore any differences detected by comparator  105  are indicative of error. However, the linear-feedback shift register output in transmitter pattern generation circuitry  117  and receiver pattern generation circuitry  107  will repeat after 2 n  cycles, where n is the bit length of the linear-feedback shift register. Therefore, according to embodiments of the invention, testing system  10  may be periodically reseeded to maintain sufficient randomness in the test patterns. 
         [0022]    According to a first variant of one embodiment, the linear-feedback shift registers  108 ,  118  in the receiver and transmitter pattern generation circuits  107 ,  117  can be reseeded periodically with their own outputs. Respective counters  140 ,  150  loaded with the value 2 n  can be used to trigger the closure, after 2 n  clock cycles, of respective switches  141 ,  151  that connect a predetermined portion of the respective shift register outputs to the inputs of respective seed registers  109 ,  121 . Because linear-feedback shift registers  108 ,  118  are synchronized, the seeds will be the same and linear-feedback shift registers  108 ,  118  will remain synchronized. 
         [0023]    In a second variant of this embodiment, to further randomize the test patterns, optional multiplexers  112 ,  132  can be included in receiver and transmitter pattern generation circuits  107 ,  117 . The various respective inputs  113 ,  133  of multiplexers  112 ,  132  can be connected to corresponding different portions (only one shown) of the registered outputs of linear-feedback shift registers  108 ,  118 . The outputs of respective second linear-feedback shift registers  128 ,  138  can be used as the respective control signals for multiplexers  112 ,  132 . Second linear-feedback shift registers  108 ,  118  can be commonly seeded ( 129 ,  139 ) initially in the same manner as linear-feedback shift registers  108 ,  118 , so that the subsequent seeds that second linear-feedback shift registers  128 ,  138  select for first linear-feedback shift registers  108 ,  118  remain synchronized. 
         [0024]    In a third variant of this embodiment, instead of providing multiplexers  112 ,  132  and second linear-feedback shift registers  128 ,  138 , only multiplexer  132  and second linear-feedback shift register  138  could be provided, so that any new seed for first linear-feedback shift registers  108 ,  118  is derived only in testing module  110 . That seed can be communicated to first linear-feedback shift register  108  in display module  100  via line  122 . In this variant, optional delay  142  may be provided between multiplexer  132  and seed register  121 , so that the arrival of the new seed at seed register  121  is delayed until the new seed arrives at seed register  109 . 
         [0025]    In a second embodiment  20 , shown in  FIG. 2 , randomness (or pseudorandomness) of the test patterns may be maintained using cryptographic techniques. 
         [0026]    In testing system  20 , display module  200  again includes display panel  101 , as well as test pattern generator  201 . Testing module  210  also includes a test pattern generator  211  which may operate identically to, and may be synchronized with, test pattern generator  201 . Testing module  210  includes a transmitter  212  operating under a suitable protocol such as the MIPI protocol, while display module  200  includes a receiver  202  operating under a suitable protocol such as the MIPI protocol. Transmitter  212  and receiver  202  may be interconnected by a suitable communication link  220 . Transmitter multiplexer  213  allows the selection of output of test pattern generator  211 , or an alternate source  214 , for transmission to display module  200 . 
         [0027]    Prior to transmission, the signal selected by transmitter multiplexer  213  may be encrypted using any suitable encryption technique (such as, e.g., DES) in transmitter encryption module  215 , to effectively randomize the test pattern. A corresponding decryption module  205  in display module  200 , using a corresponding decryption technique, may be provided to decrypt the test pattern after it is received by receiver  202 . The encryption and decryption techniques of encryption module  215  and decryption module  205  may require a key, and corresponding keys may be preloaded into key registers  206 ,  216 . Those key values may be fixed, or may be updated at appropriate intervals or when a testing operator so desires. As in the case of embodiment  10 , the key value may be loaded into register  206 —e.g., using MIPI low-power mode—over link  122  which, again, may be the same link as link  130 . 
         [0028]    The output of receiver test pattern generator  201 , as well as the decrypted received test pattern output by decryption module  205 , may be input to comparator  105 , which may transmit its bit-error rate report via link  130  to testing module  210 . Again, link  130  may operated in the MIPI low-power mode, including MIPI-LP transmitter  207  and MIPI-LP receiver  217 . 
         [0029]    Input multiplexer  208  of display module  200  allows selection of either externally generated test pattern output from decryption module  205 , or the locally generated test pattern from test pattern generator  201 , to be displayed on display module  101  for the benefit of a human testing operator. When display module  200  has passed testing and is incorporated into an electronic device, input multiplexer  208  will be set to select the externally generated signal for display, although the option of locally generated test pattern for diagnostic purposes may remain available. Moreover, although the external signal may continue to pass through decryption module  205 , the external signal is not expected to be encrypted. Accordingly, decryption module  205  may be provided with a no-encryption, or inactive, mode, or appropriate multiplexer circuitry or other switching circuitry may be provided to bypass decryption module  205 . Alternatively, decryption module  205  may continue to operate, preferably with a fixed key, and an encryption module, similar to encryption module  215 , may be provided in the electronic device, again with a fixed key. 
         [0030]    A bit-error rate tester incorporating the present invention may be used in conjunction with the device testing method and architecture described in copending, commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/239,878, filed Sep. 29, 2008, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. 
         [0031]    The techniques of the present invention may be used in such a testing architecture, for example, to determine an optimum slew rate for high-speed data. A higher slew rate may be preferable, but may be expected to generate more electromagnetic interference, increasing the bit-error rate. Thus, the slew rate may be varied while the bit-error rate is monitored in accordance with the present invention to find the minimum bit-error rate, or the best compromise of bit-error rate and slew rate (i.e., the slew rate providing the maximum tolerable bit-error rate, or at which the bit-error rate becomes noticeable). 
         [0032]    Similarly, DC bias of display  101  increases power consumption, but reduced DC bias may increase the bit-error rate. Thus, the DC bias may be varied while the bit-error rate is monitored in accordance with the present invention to find the minimum bit-error rate, or the best compromise of bit-error rate and DC bias (i.e., the DC bias providing the maximum tolerable bit-error rate, or at which the bit-error rate becomes noticeable). 
         [0033]    As described in above-incorporated application Ser. No. 12/239,878, the terminal resistance of the transmitter sending a signal to display module  200  also may affect the bit-error rate. The terminal resistance of display module  200  may be determined, to allow it to be matched, by sweeping a variable terminal resistance  144  of transmitter  114  while measuring the bit-error rate in accordance with the invention, and noting the terminal resistance at which the bit-error rate is lowest. 
         [0034]    Thus it is seen that apparatus and methods for robust testing of a peripheral component of a device, using variable test patterns, have been provided. It will be understood that the foregoing is only illustrative of the principles of the invention, and that various modifications can be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention, and the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.

Technology Category: 5