Patent Document

CROSS-REFERENCE 
     The present application relies upon, for priority, U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/984,640, filed on Nov. 1, 2007. 
    
    
     FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention relates generally to the field of radiant energy imaging systems. In particular, the present invention relates to detection systems and methods of using the detection systems in radiant energy imaging systems. And more particularly, the present invention relates to an improved detection system employing multiple screens for greater detection efficiency. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Security systems are presently limited in their ability to detect contraband, weapons, explosives, and other dangerous objects concealed under clothing. Metal detectors and chemical sniffers are commonly used for the detection of large metal objects and some varieties of explosives, however, a wide range of dangerous objects exist that cannot be detected with these devices. Plastic and ceramic weapons developed by modern technology increase the types of non-metallic objects that security personnel are required to detect; the alternative of manual searching of subjects is slow, inconvenient, and is not well-tolerated by the general public, especially as a standard procedure in, for example, airports. 
     Further, radiation exposure is an important consideration in X-ray concealed object detection systems. This issue is addressed in the American National Standard “Radiation Safety for Personnel Security Screening Systems Using X-rays” (ANSI/HPS N43.17-2002). This standard permits a radiation exposure of 0.1 microsievert (10 microrem) per scan for security inspection of the general public. It is based on the recommendations of the United States National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP) in NCRP Report No. 91, “Recommendations on Limits for Exposure to Ionizing Radiation”, 1987. In this report, the NCRP states that the health risk of a radiation exposure of less than 10 microsieverts (1000 microrem) per year is negligible, and efforts are not warranted at reducing the level further. Persons employed in high security or secured facilities, or those who frequently travel by airlines, may be subjected to many security examinations per year. The standard criterion thus assures that an individual inspected less than about 100 times per year will not receive a non-negligible radiation dose. 
     Conventional systems and methods for detecting objects concealed on persons have limitations in their design and method which prohibit them from achieving both low dose and high image quality which are prerequisites of commercial acceptance. Specifically, conventional prior art systems for people screening are designed such that they detect radiant energy that has been transmitted through the body, scattered from the body, and/or emitted from the body. In addition, in conventional people screening systems, images are produced by body characteristics and any object concealed under the subject&#39;s clothing. The system operator then inspects each image for evidence of concealed objects. 
     An example of such a system is described in U.S. Pat. No. RE 28544, assigned to American Science and Engineering, describes a “radiant energy imaging apparatus comprising: a source of a pencil beam of X-ray radiant energy; radiant energy detecting means defining a curve in fixed relationship to said source; means for scanning with said pencil beam said radiant energy detecting means along said curve to provide an image signal representative of the radiant energy response of the medium in a region traversed by said pencil beam along a path to said detecting means; means for relatively displacing said region and an assembly comprising said source and said detecting means to establish relative translating motion in a direction transverse to a line joining said source and said detecting means to produce a sequence of image signals representative of the radiant energy response of said region in two dimensions; and means responsive to said image signals for producing an image representative of said response.” 
     U.S. Pat. No. 5,181,234, assigned to the assignee of the present invention, and herein incorporated by reference, discloses “X-ray imaging apparatus for detecting a low atomic number object carried by or on a human body positioned at a distance from said apparatus comprising: x-ray source for producing a pencil beam of X-rays directed toward said human body; scanning means for moving the region of intersection of said pencil beam and said human body over the surface of said human body in a scanning cycle, said scanning cycle being sufficiently short to expose said human body to a low radiation dose; a detector assembly providing a signal representative of the intensity of the X-rays scattered from said human body as a result of being scanned by said scanning means, said detector assembly being disposed on a same side of said human body as said X-ray source and having an active area with dimensions sufficient to receive a substantial portion of said scattered X-rays to provide a coefficient of variation of less than 10 percent in said signal; and display means to presenting characteristics of the detector signal to an operator; wherein said scattered X-rays are distributed across said detector to create an edge effect which enhances edges of said low atomic number object to enable detection.” 
     In addition, prior art baggage inspection systems include detection means for both transmitted and backscattered X-rays to independently produce signals from the same incident beam. The separate signals may then be used to enhance each other to increase the system&#39;s accuracy in recognizing low Z materials. Clearly, with the incident beam being of sufficient energy to provide both transmitted and backscattered signals, the X-ray energy must be relatively high, making such systems undesirable for personnel inspection. An example of such a system is U.S. Pat. No. 4,799,247, assigned to Annis et al., which discloses “a projection imaging system for inspecting objects for highlighting low Z materials comprising: a source of penetrating radiation, means for forming radiation emitted by said source into a beam of predetermined cross-section and for repeatedly sweeping said beam across a line in space, means for moving said object to be imaged relative to said source in a direction perpendicular to said line in space, first radiant energy detector means located to be responsive to radiant energy penetrating said object and emerging from said object, substantially unchanged in direction, for producing first electrical signals, second radiant energy detector means located further from said source than said object and responsive to radiant energy scattered by said object for producing second electrical signals, third radiant energy detector means located closer to said source than said object and responsive to radiant energy scattered by said object for producing third electrical signals, display means responsive to at least a pair of said electrical signals for separately, independently and simultaneously displaying said pair of electrical signals as a function of time”. 
     As mentioned above, conventional systems and methods have limitations that prohibit them from achieving both low dose and high image quality which are prerequisites of commercial acceptance. In addition, in conventional people screening systems, images are produced by body characteristics and any object concealed under the subject&#39;s clothing. 
     The prior art systems are disadvantageous, however, because they do not adequately detect plastics, ceramics, explosives, illicit drugs, and other non-metallic objects. One reason in particular is that these materials share the property of a relatively low atomic number (low Z). Low Z materials present a special problem in personnel inspection because of the difficulty in distinguishing the low Z object from the background of the subject&#39;s body which also has low Z. An inspection system which operates at a low level of radiation exposure is limited in its precision by the small number of X-rays that can be directed against a person being searched. X-ray absorption and scattering further reduces the number of X-rays available to form an image of the person and any concealed objects. In prior art systems, this low number of detected X-rays has resulted in unacceptably poor image quality. 
     Therefore, what is needed is a method and apparatus that increases the efficiency of a detector to detect electromagnetic radiation and improve the quality of the resultant image generated, thus reducing the overall amount of radiation required. 
     What is also needed is a method for using an improved radiant energy imaging system with enhanced detection capabilities. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     It is an object of the present invention to provide an apparatus and method for increasing the efficiency of a detector to detect electromagnetic radiation and improve the quality of the resultant image generated, thus reducing the overall amount of radiation required. 
     It is another object of the present invention to provide a detector configuration that maximizes the efficiency of the detector material. It is yet another object of the present invention to absorb more X-ray photons and thus, improve detection capability. 
     In one embodiment, the present invention is a detection system for detecting electromagnetic radiation comprising: an enclosure having four adjacent walls, connected to each other at an angle and forming a rectangle and interior portion of the enclosure; a front side area and a back side area formed from the four adjacent walls and located at each end of the enclosure; at least two screens, wherein each screen further comprises an active area for receiving and converting electromagnetic radiation into light; and a photodetector, positioned in the interior portion of the enclosure, having an active area responsive to the light. 
     In another embodiment, the present invention is a detection system for detecting electromagnetic radiation comprising: an enclosure having four adjacent walls, connected to each other at an angle and forming a rectangle and interior portion of the enclosure; a front side area and a back side area formed from the four adjacent walls and located at each end of the enclosure; a screen located in the front side area, further comprising an active area for receiving and converting electromagnetic radiation into light; at least one screen located in the interior portion of the enclosure; and a photodetector, positioned in the interior of the enclosure, having an active area responsive to the light. 
     In one embodiment, the front side area is formed from at least one of the plurality of screens. In another embodiment, the active area on each of the plurality of screens comprises a scintillator material, where the scintillator material is calcium tungstate. In one embodiment, the photodetector is a photomultiplier tube. 
     In one embodiment, the detection system enclosure is capable of receiving, but not leaking electromagnetic radiation. In another embodiment, the interior surface of the adjacent enclosing walls is light reflective. 
     In one embodiment, the active area of at least one of the plurality of screens is larger than the active area of the photodetector and the areal density is 80 mg/cm 2 . 
     In one embodiment, the surface geometry of at least one of the plurality of screens is straight or smooth. In another embodiment, the surface geometry of at least one of the plurality of screens is irregular. In yet another embodiment, the surface geometry of at least one of the plurality of screens is contoured. In still another embodiment, the surface geometry of at least one of the plurality of screens is corrugated. 
     In another embodiment, the present invention is a radiant energy imaging system comprising: a radiation source; a detection system, comprising i) an enclosure having four adjacent walls, connected to each other at an angle and forming a rectangle and interior portion of the enclosure; ii) a front side area and a back side area formed from the four adjacent walls and located at each end of the enclosure; iii) a plurality of screens, wherein each screen further comprises an active area for receiving and converting electromagnetic radiation into light; and iv) a photodetector, positioned in the interior of the enclosure, having an active area responsive to the light; an image processor for receiving signals from the photodetector and generating an image; and a display for displaying the image generated. 
     In one embodiment, the radiant energy imaging system is a people screening system. In another embodiment, the radiant energy imaging system is a baggage screening system. 
    
    
     
       BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS 
       These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be appreciated, as they become better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein: 
         FIG. 1  is a front view illustration of a conventional detector enclosure, having one screen; 
         FIGS. 2   a  and  2   b  illustrate the incidence of electromagnetic radiation on a first screen of a conventional detector enclosure; 
         FIG. 3  illustrates one embodiment of the detector enclosure of the present invention, having a plurality of screens, showing the incidence of electromagnetic radiation on the plurality of screens; 
         FIG. 4  illustrates another embodiment of the detector enclosure of the present invention, having a plurality of screens, showing the incidence of electromagnetic radiation on the plurality of screens; 
         FIG. 5  illustrates one embodiment of a backscatter inspection system in which any of the detector enclosures of the present invention can be implemented; and 
         FIG. 6  illustrates one embodiment of a traditional transmission X-ray screening system in which any of the detector enclosures of the present invention can be implemented. 
     
    
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION 
     The present invention is directed towards several embodiments of an electromagnetic radiation detector in which a plurality of screens is employed. The present invention is directed towards a detection system enclosure having at least one screen. Electromagnetic radiation is absorbed by the screen which emits light photons that are detected by a photomultiplier tube located within the enclosure. In one embodiment, the detection system of the present invention has one screen located at the front of the enclosure and at least one screen located in the interior of the enclosure. In one embodiment, the at least one screen comprises an active area for receiving and converting electromagnetic radiation into light (photons). In one embodiment, the active area of the at least one screen comprises a scintillator material. In one embodiment, the scintillator material is calcium tungstate. 
     In one embodiment, the at least one screen has a thickness (areal density) of 80 mg/cm 2 . In one embodiment, the surface geometry of the at least one screen is straight or smooth. In one embodiment, the surface geometry of the at least one screen is irregular. In another embodiment, the surface geometry of the at least one screen is contoured. In another embodiment, the surface geometry of the at least one screen is corrugated; a corrugated surface geometry provides a greater surface area for receiving and converting electromagnetic radiation into light, by allowing for an increase in the electromagnetic radiation path length without increasing the light output path length, for maximum detection efficiency. It should be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that any surface geometry may be used for the screen to increase the amount of electromagnetic radiation absorbed. 
     The present invention is also directed towards the use of at least one screen in the interior of the enclosure, thus increasing the amount of electromagnetic radiation reaching the detector, and subsequently, the amount of photons reaching the photomultiplier. In one embodiment, the at least one screen located in the interior of the enclosure has identical specifications to the screen located in the front of the enclosure. In one embodiment, the at least one screen positioned in the interior of the enclosure is different from the screen located in the front of the enclosure, in terms of at least one of chemical composition, surface geometry, thickness and energy response. The use of a screen at the front of the enclosure and the at least one screen in the interior of the enclosure increases the amount of electromagnetic radiation absorbed and therefore, the number of photons generated, further improving detection capability, and thus image quality. 
     Thus, the present invention is directed towards a detector configuration that maximizes the efficiency of the detector material. Detection efficiency is a measure of the efficiency of the detector screen, or, the probability that electromagnetic radiation will be absorbed by the screen to produce light photons detectable by the photomultiplier tube. X-ray detectors need to interact with incident x-ray photons to record their presence; x-rays that pass through the detector without interaction are wasted. Detection efficiency is mainly determined by the interaction probability of the photons with the detector material and the thickness of the material. The following equation can be used to calculate the efficiency of a detector:
 
 I=I   0   *e   −μx  
 
where I 0  is the number of photons of a certain energy incident or entering the slab of material; x is the thickness of the slab, I is the number of photons that have passed through a layer of thickness x, and μ is the linear attenuation coefficient of the material for photons of this particular energy. The photons that do not get through have interacted within the slab of material and are either absorbed or scattered. The number of photons absorbed by a certain thickness is the difference I0−I. However, instead of calculating for different I&#39;s, the ratio of (I0−I)/I is calculated and it is called the “Percent Absorption.” Conventional screens typically achieve far less than 100% efficiency. The present invention is directed toward absorbing more of the otherwise wasted X-ray photons and thereby improving the detection capability.
 
     In another embodiment, the present invention is also directed towards a detection system enclosure that further comprises a photo-multiplier tube, positioned in the interior of the enclosure, having an active area responsive to the light. In another embodiment, the active area of the at least one screen is larger than the active area of the photo-multiplier tube so that the amount of electromagnetic radiation absorbed is maximized. 
     The present invention is directed towards multiple embodiments. Language used in this specification should not be interpreted as a general disavowal of any one specific embodiment or used to limit the claims beyond the meaning of the terms used therein. Reference will now be made in detail to specific embodiments of the invention. While the invention will be described in conjunction with specific embodiments, it is not intended to limit the invention to one embodiment. 
       FIG. 1  is a front view illustration of a conventional detector enclosure, having one screen. Detector  100  comprises an enclosure having four adjacent walls,  102   a ,  102   b ,  102   c , and  102   d , connected to each other at an angle. The four adjacent walls  102   a ,  102   b ,  102   c , and  102   d  form a rectangular shape. Adjacent walls  102   a ,  102   b ,  102   c , and  102   d  further form a front side area  106  and a back side area  104  at the ends of the enclosure. The enclosure formed from adjacent walls  102   a ,  102   b ,  102   c ,  102   d , front side area  106  and back side area  104  is capable of receiving, but not leaking electromagnetic radiation, thereby blocking the exit of incoming radiation from a radiation source. The ability of the enclosure to receive, and not leak, radiation, is facilitated by the light reflective interiors of the enclosing walls. Typically, the interiors of walls  102   a ,  102   b ,  102   c , and  102   d  are painted white so that they are highly light reflective. 
     The front side area  106  of detector enclosure  100  is used for receiving radiation and thus faces the object under inspection when in use in an exemplary scanning system. Front side area  106  further comprises a screen  107 . Detector enclosure  100  further comprises a photo-detector  108 , placed in the interior of the enclosure proximate to back side area  104 . The photo-detector  108  is a photomultiplier tube. Photomultiplier tubes are well-known to those of ordinary skill in the art and will not be discussed herein. 
       FIGS. 2   a  and  2   b  illustrate the incidence of electromagnetic radiation on a first screen of a conventional detector enclosure. In operation, the screening system directs electromagnetic radiation from a source toward a subject or object under inspection such that the X-rays are incident upon the subject or object. The X-rays are then, depending upon the intensity of the X-ray and the type of inspection system being employed, scattered from or transmitted through the subject or object under inspection. The radiation source and the nature of the X-ray beam are described in detail with respect to  FIGS. 5 and 6  below and will not be discussed further. 
     Now referring to  FIG. 2   a  scattered or transmitted X-rays  210  reach the detector enclosure  200  and first impinge upon screen  207 . Screen  207  absorbs at least a portion of the scattered or transmitted X-rays  210  and converts the X-rays into light photons  206  in the interior of detector enclosure  200 . As shown in  FIG. 2   b , however, some of the X-rays are not absorbed and thus pass through screen  207 . In addition, in a conventional detector enclosure with only one front screen, at least a portion of photons  206  reflect off of the highly reflective interior walls of the enclosure and are subsequently detected by photomultiplier tube  208 . 
     Referring to  FIG. 3 , the present invention is a detector enclosure comprising at least one additional screen (not shown in  FIGS. 2   a  and  2   b ) in the interior of the enclosure. The at least one additional screen further increases the exposure rate of the scattered or transmitted X-rays  210 . The net effect of the at least one additional screen is to increase the photo-detection efficiency of photomultiplier tube  208  by absorbing more electromagnetic radiation, subsequently converting that radiation to light, and thus, providing the photomultiplier tube with a stronger signal to detect. 
       FIG. 3  illustrates one embodiment of the detector of the present invention, having a plurality of screens. Detector enclosure  300  is similar to the enclosure described with respect to  FIG. 1 , in that it comprises four adjacent side walls, the proximal sides of which form a front side area  306  and distal sides of which form a back side area  304 . One of ordinary skill in the art should appreciate that the detector enclosure of  FIG. 1  can be modified to create the embodiment shown in  FIG. 3 . 
     Referring now to  FIG. 3 , first screen  307   a  is located on the front side area  306  of detector enclosure  300 . In one embodiment, second and third screens  307   b  and  307   c  are positioned inside the detector enclosure  300 . The X-rays scattered from or transmitted through the subject or object under inspection  310  first impinge upon first screen  307   a  of detector enclosure  300 . Some of the scattered or transmitted X-rays, however, are not absorbed by first screen  307   a  and thus pass through first screen  307   a.    
     To increase detection efficiency, in one embodiment, detector enclosure  300  further comprises second and third screens,  307   b  and  307   c , respectively in the interior of the enclosure. Second and third screens,  307   b  and  307   c , respectively, further increase the exposure rate and thus, absorption of the scattered or transmitted X-rays  310 . The overall effect of the first, second, and third screens is an increase in the photo-detection efficiency of photomultiplier tube  308  by absorbing more electromagnetic radiation, subsequently converting that radiation to light, and thus, providing the photomultiplier tube with a stronger signal to detect. 
     In one embodiment, first screen  307   a  comprises an active area for receiving and converting electromagnetic radiation into light (photons). In one embodiment, first screen  307   a  is a fluorescent chemical screen. In one embodiment, scintillators in the fluorescent chemical screen  307   a  detect a large fraction of the incident radiation, produce significant light output to the photomultiplier tube, and exhibit a temporal decay time which is short compared to the pixel to pixel scanning rate of the radiation beam. 
     In one embodiment, the fluorescent chemical screen includes calcium tungstate. Generally, a calcium tungstate screen has a relatively short decay time of 10 microseconds that allows rapid scanning of the radiation beam with minimal image degradation. The calcium tungstate screen is capable of detecting approximately 70% of the backscattered or transmitted radiation, and thus, produces approximately 250 usable light photons per 30 KeV X-ray. 
     Additionally, the use of a thicker screen enables the detection of more of the radiation incident upon the detector at the expense of lower light output. In one embodiment, the areal density of the screen is 80 milligrams per square centimeter. 
     In one embodiment, the at least one screen located in the interior of the enclosure has identical specifications to the screen located in the front of the enclosure. Thus, in one embodiment, second and third screens  307   b  and  307   c , respectively, are identical to first screen  307   a . In one embodiment, the at least one screen positioned in the interior of the enclosure is different from the screen located in the front of the enclosure, in terms of at least one of chemical composition, surface geometry, thickness and energy response. Thus, in one embodiment, second and third screens  307   b  and  307   c , respectively, are different from first screen  307   a.    
     Although exemplary screens have been described above, it should be noted that the characteristics of the screen can vary widely in terms of chemical composition, surface geometry, thickness and energy response, and that any type of screen may be used in the present invention, as would be evident to those of ordinary skill in the art. 
       FIG. 4  illustrates another embodiment of the detector enclosure of the present invention, having a plurality of screens. In one embodiment, the surface geometry of the at least one screen is straight or smooth. In one embodiment, the surface geometry of the at least one screen is irregular. In another embodiment, the surface geometry of the at least one screen is contoured. In another embodiment, the surface geometry of the at least one screen is corrugated. A corrugated surface geometry provides a greater surface area for receiving and converting electromagnetic radiation into light, by allowing for an increase in the electromagnetic radiation path length without increasing the light output path length, for maximum detection efficiency. It should be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that any surface type may be used for the screen to increase the amount of electromagnetic radiation absorbed. 
     In one embodiment, screen  407  located on front side area  404  of detector enclosure  400  is corrugated. The corrugated surface of screen  404  provides a greater surface area for absorbing scattered or transmitted electromagnetic radiation  410 , incident upon the detector enclosure  400 . It should be noted that because light generated in spaces  411 , defined by screens  407  and  408 , cannot escape easily, the detection efficiency, or effective detection area is reduced. 
       FIG. 5  illustrates one embodiment of a scanning system in which any of the detector enclosures of the present invention can be implemented. In one embodiment, the detector enclosure of the present invention is employed in a backscatter X-ray scanning system, such as but not limited to a people screening system. In one embodiment, inspection system  500  comprises radiation source  508  and at least one detector enclosure  502 . As described in detail above, the at least one detector enclosure  502  may comprise any number of arrangements including, but, not limited to at least one detector screen. In addition, at least one detector enclosure  502 , in another embodiment, may comprise any number of arrangements including, but, not limited to a plurality of detector screens. While various arrangements of detectors will not be repeated herein, it should be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that any number of detector arrangements can be employed, as described above and the exemplary embodiment is not intended to limit the present invention. 
     Referring back to  FIG. 5 , X-ray source  508  is used to generate radiation. In one embodiment, X-ray source  508  is employed to generate a narrow pencil beam  506  of X-rays directed towards an object or subject under examination  504 . In one embodiment, pencil beam is formed with the integration of an x-ray tube, a mechanical chopper wheel, and a slit. 
     In one embodiment, x-ray source  508  operates with an empirically and theoretically determined optimum X-ray tube potential of 50 KeV and 5 milliamps, resulting in X-rays of approximately 30 KeV. The vertical and horizontal dimension of the X-ray beam is approximately six millimeters (6 mm) where it strikes subject  504 . Subject  504  is a body that is being subjected to X-ray imaging. In one embodiment, subject  504  is a human. In another embodiment, subject  504  is an object. Initially, X-ray beam  506  strikes only the body of subject  504 . Many of the X-rays penetrate a few centimeters into the body, interact by Compton scattering, and exit the body through the same surface that they entered. X-ray sensitive detector enclosures  502  are placed symmetrically around incident X-ray pencil beam to detect backscattered X-rays  510  and provide an electronic signal characteristic of the X-ray reflectance. It should be understood to those of ordinary skill in the art that any number of ionizing radiation sources may be used, including but not limited to gamma radiation, electromagnetic radiation, and ultraviolet radiation. 
     Detectors  502  are positioned for uniform X-ray detection on all sides of X-ray beam  506 . In one embodiment, arrays of detectors  502  are placed around source  508  for uniform detection of backscattered rays  510 . Detectors  502  include an enclosure capable of enclosing or “trapping” scattered rays  510 . A photo-detector generates electronic signals in response to detected rays that are initially converted into light. Details about the structure and operation of several embodiments of a detector  502  are discussed in detail with respect to  FIGS. 1-4  and will not be repeated herein. 
     In one embodiment, each detector  502  produces electronic signals which are directed to a processor. The processor analyzes the received signals and generates an image on a display means  512 . The intensity at each point in the displayed image corresponds to the relative intensity of the detected scattered X-rays. In one embodiment, X-ray source  508  communicates synchronization signals to the processor. The processor analyzes the detected signals and compares them to the synchronization signals to determine the display image. 
     In one embodiment, display means  512  is a monitor and is employed to display graphical images signaled by the processor. Display means  512  can be any display or monitor as commonly known in the art, including a cathode ray tube monitor or an LCD monitor. In one embodiment, the digitized scatter image displayed by display means  512  preferably consists of 480 rows by 160 columns with 8 bits per pixel. 
     Referring back to  FIG. 5 , detectors  502  are separated by an opening through which x-ray beam  506  passes before striking subject  504 . In one embodiment, detectors  502  can move in a vertical direction while X-ray beam  506  moves in a horizontal direction by movement of X-ray source  508  in the horizontal direction. However, the placement and movement of detectors  502  and source  508  is not limited to the description provided herein. In other embodiments, detectors  502  and source  508  can be placed and moved by any method as is commonly known in the art. The intersection of x-ray beam  506  and subject  504  defines an image picture element (pixel) of a specified area. 
       FIG. 6  illustrates another embodiment of a scanning system in which any of the detector enclosures of the present invention can be implemented. In another embodiment, the scanning system is a traditional X-ray scanning system, in which X-rays are transmitted through the object under inspection. In one embodiment, the traditional transmission X-ray scanning system is a baggage scanning system. 
     In one embodiment, inspection system  600  comprises radiation source  608  and at least one detector enclosure  602 . As described in detail above, the at least one detector enclosure  602  may comprise any number of arrangements including, but, not limited to at least one detector screen. In addition, at least one detector enclosure  602 , in another embodiment, may comprise any number of arrangements including, but, not limited to a plurality of detector screens. While various arrangements of detectors will not be repeated herein, it should be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that any number of detector arrangements can be employed, as described above and the exemplary embodiment is not intended to limit the present invention. 
     Referring back to  FIG. 6 , X-ray source  608  is used to generate radiation. In one embodiment, X-ray source  608  is employed to generate a narrow pencil beam  606  of X-rays directed towards an object or subject under examination  604 . In one embodiment, pencil beam is formed with the integration of an x-ray tube, a mechanical chopper wheel, and a slit. 
     Object  604  is an item that is subjected to X-ray imaging. In one embodiment, object  604  is a piece of luggage or carry-on baggage. Initially, X-ray beam  606  strikes only the object  604 . Many of the X-rays are transmitted through the object, interact by Compton scattering, and exit the object through the opposite surface that they entered. X-ray sensitive detector enclosures  602  are placed symmetrically around incident X-ray pencil beam to detect transmitted X-rays  610  and provide an electronic signal characteristic of the X-ray transmission. 
     It should be understood to those of ordinary skill in the art that any number of ionizing radiation sources may be used, including but not limited to gamma radiation, electromagnetic radiation, and ultraviolet radiation. 
     Detectors  602  are positioned for uniform X-ray detection on all sides of X-ray beam  606 . In one embodiment, arrays of detectors  602  are placed around object  604  for uniform detection of transmitted rays  610 . Detectors  602  include an enclosure capable of enclosing or “trapping” scattered rays  610 . A photo-detector generates electronic signals in response to detected rays that are initially converted into light. Details about the structure and operation of several embodiments of a detector  602  are discussed in detail with respect to  FIGS. 1-4  and will not be repeated herein. 
     In one embodiment, each detector  602  produces electronic signals which are directed to a processor. The processor analyzes the received signals and generates an image on a display means  612 . The intensity at each point in the displayed image corresponds to the relative intensity of the detected transmitted X-rays. In one embodiment, X-ray source  608  communicates synchronization signals to the processor. The processor analyzes the detected signals and compares them to the synchronization signals to determine the display image. In one embodiment, display means  612  is a monitor and is employed to display graphical images signaled by the processor. Display means  612  can be any display or monitor as commonly known in the art, including a cathode ray tube monitor or an LCD monitor. In one embodiment, the digitized image displayed by display means  612  preferably consists of 480 rows by 160 columns with 8 bits per pixel. 
     In one embodiment, detectors  602  can move in a vertical direction while X-ray beam  606  moves in a horizontal direction by movement of X-ray source  608  in the horizontal direction. However, the placement and movement of detectors  602  and source  608  is not limited to the description provided herein. In other embodiments, detectors  602  and source  608  can be placed and moved by any method as is commonly known in the art. The intersection of x-ray beam  606  and object  604  defines an image picture element (pixel) of a specified area. 
     The above examples are merely illustrative of the many applications of the system of present invention. Although only a few embodiments of the present invention have been described herein, it should be understood that the present invention might be embodied in many other specific forms without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Therefore, the present examples and embodiments are to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive, and the invention is not to be limited to the details given herein, but may be modified within the scope of the appended claims.

Technology Category: 3