Patent Document

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS  
       [0001]    This application is the US National Stage of International Application No. PCT/DE02/03442, filed Sep. 13, 2002 and claim the benefit thereof. The International Application claims the benefits of German application No. 10145493.7 filed Sep. 14, 2001, and of German application No. 10152339.4 filed Oct. 24, 2002, all of the applications are incorporated by referent herein in their entirety. 
     
    
     
       FIELD OF INVENTION  
         [0002]    Method and communication system for establishing at least one failsafe communication link by a communication system located in a communication network.  
         BACKGROUND OF INVENTION  
         [0003]    In current communication networks or communication systems increased data volumes, higher failsafe requirements and connection of a greater number of subscribers to communication systems demand the implementation of protection switching mechanisms so that, in the event of a hardware or a line failure, the functions within a communication network can be maintained.  
           [0004]    DE 198 31 562 for example publishes the principle of line redundancy in communication networks designed in accordance with the Synchronous Digital Hierarchy or in Sonet transmission networks, where line redundancy is used to protect the traffic carried on the lines against failure. This involves using a second line to make a redundant transmission channel available which, in the event of an error, can take over the data traffic of the data line originally used. What is known as 1+1 line redundancy is in widespread use, in which at the sending end of the transmission link the traffic to be transmitted can be sent over what is known as a bridge on both lines almost simultaneously and at the receive end, what is known as a “selector” can be used to select the data traffic from one of the two lines for further processing.  
           [0005]    As well as protecting data traffic on the transmission line the functions of the interface module located in the relevant communication system must also be protected against failure Within the framework of module redundancy a second module is made available and assigned to the first module, with the ability to take over the functions of the module originally used in the event to a failure.  
           [0006]    Line and module redundancy can be combined as laid down in the publication mentioned above. In this case the protection switching of the data line and the interface module are coupled to each other. Line protection switching automatically leads to module protection switching and vice versa. This method is employed especially in large communication systems which are equipped with a larger number of transmission lines. These communication systems, in addition to the interface modules, are also have modules which look after the central functions of the communication system, such as switching functions or central control functions. These modules can also be protected against failure by module redundancy. The module redundancy of the central modules is not however linked to the module redundancy of the interface modules or to line redundancy.  
           [0007]    [0007]FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a communication system in which line and module redundancy are implemented. The line redundancy and the module redundancy of the interface modules are linked to each other. The outgoing data stream from the communication-system is directed by means of a bridge via both interface modules to both outgoing lines whereas a selector is used to select one incoming data stream for further processing from the incoming data streams routed via the interface module. The central control function of this communication system is executed separately from the interface modules and lines but can also have a redundant configuration. When protection switching of the lines and the interface modules is undertaken the central control function is not switched over. Protection the switching of the central control function does not affect the lines and interface modules. The same applies for other central functions implemented in the communications system in each case, such as the call processing function.  
           [0008]    In smaller communication systems such as can be found for example in subscriber access networks, for cost reasons on the one hand high levels of integration must be achieved within the communication system and on the other hand redundancy must be provided to protect the ever-greater volumes of data and numbers of subscribers and to improve failsafe performance.  
           [0009]    The high level of integration, in addition to increasing the number of subscribers that can be connected to a subscriber line module, also leads to integration of central functions of the communication system with central transmission interfaces used jointly by many subscribers.  
           [0010]    In addition a number of these communication systems can be linked to each other in a chain so that on the central communication network side only one transmission line has to be used instead of several. The transmission line used for chaining is also in a redundant configuration in this case—see FIG. 2. For reasons of cost the transmission interface, together with the transmission interface leading to the central network and central functions of the communication system, are integrated onto one module.  
           [0011]    Combining central functions and central transmission interfaces on one module or interface module means that the line redundancy of the transmission lines and the module redundancy of the common modules can no longer be coupled as they were previously. Neither may the line redundancies of the transmission line leading to a central communication network and the transmission line used for chaining be coupled to each other. The disadvantage that would result from this is that for line protection switching of the transmission line leading to the central communication network central functions of the communication system, especially the central control functions and also the transmission line used for chaining would also have to be switched over. Equally disadvantageously, with line protection switching in one section of a chain of communication systems, all sections of this chain as well as the central functions of the communications systems combined into this chain would have to be switched over.  
         SUMMARY OF INVENTION  
         [0012]    The object of the invention is thus to realize a line and module redundancy for a communication system in which the transmission interface of the transmission line and the central control functions are integrated on a module or access unit. The object is achieved, starting with a method and a communications system in accordance of the preambles of Patent claims  1  and  9 , by their identifying features.  
           [0013]    With the method in accordance with the invention for realizing at least one failsafe communication link through a communication system arranged in a communication network a number of access units are provided, arranged in the communications system and assigned to each other, to which in each case one of a number of redundant transmission lines is connected to realize at least one communication link. Communication link-specific information is transferred to one of the redundant transmission line provided for implementing the at least one transmission link and to the access unit connected to it. Control functions are provided in each of the access units to control communication system specific functions realized centrally in the communication system and/or access unit-specific functions realized in the relevant access unit.  
           [0014]    The important aspect of the method in accordance with the invention lies in the fact that on failure of least a part of the control functions in one of the access units, at least the failed communication system-specific and/or access unit-specific functions will be controlled by the control functions of the at least one assigned access unit.  
           [0015]    The major advantage of the method in accordance with the invention lies in the fact that in communication networks or communication systems which are located in the subscriber access area for example—also referred to as Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexers DSLAM—failsafe transmission interfaces to the central communication network and central functions of the communication system can be integrated onto one of module or access unit at low cost. The central functions can include control functions, call processing functions, timing and synchronization devices, management interfaces etc. or subfunctions of one or more of these functions.  
           [0016]    The method in accordance with the invention advantageously combines a line redundancy for one or more transmission lines with module redundancy for a central module or access unit which contains both the interface functions and also the control functions of the communication system. In this case the line redundancy of the interfaces remains independent of each other and protection switching of a transmission line or a transmission interface it does not also lead to protection switching of the module or access unit. The protection switching of the central functions or the module can lead to the protection switching of the transmission lines connected to them. This produces the following advantages  
           [0017]    low-cost realization of module and line redundancy sine transmission interfaces and central functions are integrated on one module.  
           [0018]    limited effect of faults in a communication network since, despite integration of a transmission interface and the central control functions on one module, a failure of a transmission line does not additionally lead to protection switching of the module or the access unit including the central control function and thereby to additional downtimes.  
           [0019]    limited effect of faults in the communication network, since despite the integration of a number of transmission interfaces onto one module a failure of a transmission line does not affect further transmission lines beyond module redundancy.  
           [0020]    Further advantageous embodiments of the method in accordance with invention as well as a communication system for implementing at least one failsafe communication link can be taken from the further claims. 
       
    
    
     BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS  
       [0021]    The method in accordance with the invention is explained below on the basis of a number of diagrams. The diagrams show:  
         [0022]    [0022]FIG. 1 a schematic diagram of a communication system in which line and module redundancy are implemented,  
         [0023]    [0023]FIG. 2 the daisy-chaining of a number of communication systems,  
         [0024]    [0024]FIG. 3 a network-side access of the communication system to one or more further communication systems,  
         [0025]    [0025]FIG. 4 a communication system in which, in accordance with the invention, the line and module redundancy are implemented independently of one another,  
         [0026]    [0026]FIGS. 5-7 examples of the protection switching of a transmission line in the event of a line failure and the protection switching of a module in the event of circuit failure as well as their effects on the other redundant functions. 
     
    
     DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF INVENTION  
       [0027]    [0027]FIG. 4 shows a block diagram of a communications system KE located in a communication network, for example an SDH communication network in which the independence of line and module redundancy is fulfilled in accordance with the invention. The redundant transmission lines ÜL 1 , ÜL 3 , or ÜL 2 , ÜL 4  provided within the framework of a failsafe communication link kb 1 ,  2  are connected to redundant transmission interfaces ÜSS 1  . . .  4 , in which case these redundant transmission interfaces ÜSS 1  . . .  4  are located on different central modules or access units AE 1 ,  2 . The transmission lines ÜL 1 , ÜL 3  or ÜL 2 , ÜL 4  in this case form of a pair as regards the line redundancy and as regards the communication link kb 1 , 2  to be realized in each case.  
         [0028]    For the further exemplary embodiment it is assumed that the first and the third transmission line ÜL 1 , 2  are connected to a first further communication system Z 1  and the second and fourth transmission line UL 2 , 4  are connected to a second further communication system Z 2 —shown in FIG. 4.  
         [0029]    Furthermore redundant central control functions zsf 1  or zsf 2  are realized in the communication system KE, in which case the redundant control functions zsf 1 ,  2  are also located on the different central access units AE 1 ,  2 . These central control functions zsf 1 , zsf 2  are performed by a control unit STE or by a processor which can also perform local control functions on the relevant access unit AE 1 ,  2 , for example control functions for the transmission interfaces ÜSS 1 ,  2  or ÜSS 3 ,  4 . The central control functions zsf 1 ,  2  are connected to each other via a communication connection KV via which the sequence of protection switching can be coordinated and via which the central control functions zsf 1 ,  2  can be synchronized with each other. The communication connection KV contains both hardware dominant parts for time-critical protection switching procedures and for protection switching cases in which a software-controlled switchover is no longer possible, as well as software dominated parts for less time critical sequences.  
         [0030]    In the communication system shown in FIG. 4 the existence of a bridge and a selector function which the reader is assumed to be familiar is also indicated without its location or embodiment within the communication system being described in any greater detail.  
         [0031]    The subscriber-side interfaces of the communications system, such as for example xDSL interfaces or further transmission interfaces used for cascading are significant components of the communications system which are not shown in FIG. 4.  
         [0032]    The redundancy architecture in accordance with the invention shown in FIG. 4 is not dependent on the realization of the central call processing function of the communication system. This redundancy architecture can for example be realized together with a is-based call processing architecture, A switching network based or star-type serial interface-based call processing architecture. The call processing architecture can itself also be a redundant configuration and parts of this call processing architecture can be integrated on the central access units AE 1  or AE 2 .  
         [0033]    The connection between the communication system and a TMNS system (TMN: Telecommunication Management Network) can be made using what is known as an inband connection. In this case the connection to the TMN system is routed together with the other traffic as part of an “inband connection” on the transmission lines It can also be realized in accordance with an “outband connection”, in which case the communication system is connected to the TMN system via a separate interface, for example an Ethernet interface. Both options can be realized with the aid of the method in accordance with the invention or with the redundancy architecture according to the invention.  
         [0034]    The central clock generator function for a communication system can also be integrated onto the central access units AE 1 ,  2 .  
         [0035]    Protection switching in the sense of line redundancy can take place on failure of a transmission line ÜL 1  . . .  4 . Protection switching in the sense of module redundancy can be undertaken for a fault in the hardware or in parts of the hardware of an access unit BG 1 ,  2  or with a non-repairable software error in the central control function zsf 1 ,  2 . The redundancy of the central control function zsf 1 ,  2  is thus a component of the module redundancy. A hardware fault on a module or access unit AE 1 ,  2  can also be a fault in the hardware of a transmission interface ÜSS 1  . . .  4 .  
         [0036]    In accordance with the invention it is possible, with a fault that can be uniquely assigned to the central control function, to undertake protection switching of the central control function zsf 1 ,  2  without simultaneous protection switching of the module or access unit AE 1 ,  2 . The protection switching of the transmission line ÜL 1  . . .  4  as a result of the protection switching of the central control function of an access unit AE 1 ,  2  can advantageously be avoided here. In this case however the error in the central control function zsf 1 ,  2  may not however affect the functions necessary for protection switching of the central control function zsf 1 ,  2 . To replace the defective module or access unit AE 1 ,  2  protection switching can however be necessary later for the access unit AE 1 ,  2 .  
         [0037]    If the software for the central control function of an access unit AE 1 ,  2  is updated, the independence of line and module redundancy can be used to advantage by first updating or loading a first central control function zsf 1 ,  2  with new software while the other unit takes over active control of the communication system KE. After updating of the first central control function zsf 1  the central control function can be switched over and the second central control function zsf 2  loaded or updated with new software while the first central control function zsf 1  takes over the active function of controlling the communication system KE. A switchover of the transmission lines ÜL 1 ,  2  or ÜL 3 ,  4  connected to an access unit AE 1 ,  2  in each case is not required here.  
         [0038]    The central control function zsf 1 ,  2  can for example be switched over with a manual switchover command for test purposes. A switchover of the transmission lines ÜL 1 ,  2  or ÜL 3 ,  4  is not necessary here either.  
         [0039]    On protection switching of a transmission line (line redundancy) the data traffic transferred over this transmission line is switched over a using the bridge and selector function of the communication system KE to the redundant transmission line ÜL 1  . . .  4 . The data traffic on the line connected to the second transmission interface and ÜSS 1  . . .  4  is not subject to any switchover in this case. This line remains in the same state as it was before the switchover of the first line. The switchover of a transmission line does not lead to the switchover of the central control function zsf 1 ,  2 .  
         [0040]    On protection switching of the access unit or module AE 1 ,  2  (module redundancy) all functions of the module will be transferred to the redundant module. These functions also include the functions of the transmission interfaces ÜSS 1 ,  2  or ÜSS 3 ,  4 . Transmission lines for which the data traffic is to be routed via the module for which protection switching is to be undertaken must also be protection switched as part of the switchover.  
         [0041]    In accordance with the invention, the measures to be undertaken as part of line redundancy do not have any affect on the other transmission line connected to the relevant access unit AE 1 ,  2  in each case. Furthermore the measures to be undertaken as part of line redundancy do not have any affect on module redundancy. Measures for module redundancy can however include measures for line redundancy. Further the central control function zsf 1 ,  2  of an access unit AE 1 ,  2  can be switched over independently of line redundancy and module redundancy. Two exemplary embodiments will be used below to illustrate protection switching of a transmission line ÜL 1  . . .  4  in the case of a line fault and protection switching of a module or access unit AE 1 ,  2  in the case of a hardware fault on the access unit AE 1 ,  2  as well as their effects on the other redundant functions.  
         [0042]    The state in which the traffic selected as active by the selector is to be transmitted over a transmission line ÜL 1  . . .  4  is indicated below by the operating state “active”. The redundant line ÜL 1  . . .  4  in this case has the operating state “standby”. The active central control function zsf 1 ,  2  is also described by the “active” operating state whereas the redundant control function zsf 1 ,  2  is to be described by the “standby” operating state.  
       EXAMPLE 1  
     Line Protection Switching  
       [0043]    In the initial state, as shown in FIG. 5, transmission lines ÜL 1  and ÜL 2  as well as central access unit AE 1  are in the “active” state.  
         [0044]    The transmission lines ÜL 1  . . .  4  are for example STM-1 transmission lines in accordance with the Synchronous Digital Hierarchy (SDH), with ÜL 1  and ÜL 2  representing working transmission lines in the sense of the SDH/Sonet line redundancy and transmission lines ÜL 3  and ÜL 4  representing “protection lines”. The control protocol of the SDH/Sonet line redundancy is running on the “protection lines” ÜL 3 ,  4 .  
         [0045]    An error on transmission line ÜL 1  with the operating state “active” is detected by the transmission interface ÜSS 1  arranged on the first access unit AE 1 . The local control function of the access unit AE 1  contained in the central control function zsf 1  notifies this error via the communication connection KV to the local control function contained in the central control function zsf 2  of the second access unit AE 2  Via the third transmission line ÜL 3  the protection switching of the transmission lines via the control protocol of the SDH/Sonet line redundancy is agreed and controlled with the device or communication system connected to the other end of the transmission lines ÜL 1  and ÜL 3 . Within the communication system KE data traffic transmitted between the subscriber-side modules—not shown—and the first transmission line ÜL 1  is switched over by means of the bridge and selector to the transmission line ÜL 3 . The data traffic transmitted between the second transmission line ÜL 2  and the first transmission line ÜL 1  is also switched over by mean of the bridge and selector to a connection between the second and third transmission lines ÜL 2  and ÜL 3 . In accordance with invention protection switching of the modules does not take place After execution of the line protection switching—this state is shown in FIG. 6—the transmission lines ÜL 3  and ÜL 2  and also the access unit AE 1  are in the “active” state. The transmission line ÜL 2  and ÜL 4 , as well as the first access unit AE 1  were not protection switched.  
       EXAMPLE 2  
     Module Protection Switching  
       [0046]    In the initial state, as shown in FIG. 6, transmission lines ÜL 3  and U{umlaut over (L)} 2  as well as the first access unit AE 1  are in the “active” state. Furthermore the central control function zsf 1  arranged in the first access unit AE 1  is in the “active” state. Furthermore the conditions specified in Example 1 also apply to this exemplary embodiment.  
         [0047]    The local control function of the first access unit AE 1  contained in the central control function zsf 1  detects a hardware fault on the first access unit AE 1  and notifies this to the central control function zsf 1 . The central control function zsf 1  transfers the corresponding information about the hardware fault via the communication connection KV to the central control function zsf 2  arranged in the second access unit AE 2 . With the aid of the transferred information the central control function zsf 2  arranged in the second access unit AE 2  is notified that module protection switching must take place, in which case the central control function zsf 2  performs protection switching. Depending on the effects of the hardware fault on the central access unit AE 1  a controlled line protection switching for the transmission lines ÜL 2  and ÜL 4  can be undertaken before the module protection switching.  
         [0048]    After the module protection switching has been executed—shown in FIG. 7—the transmission lines ÜL 3  and ÜL 4  as well as the second access unit AE 2  are in the “active” state. The transmission lines ÜL 2  and ÜL 4  must also have been switched over as part of module protection switching while transmission lines ÜL 1  and ÜL 3  are already in a state in which module protection switching does not lead to line protection switching.  
         [0049]    The hardware-dominated components of the communication connection KV between the first and the second access unit AE 1 , AE 2  name in the exemplary embodiment are explained in more detail below. The following functions should be provided via hardware-based interfaces between the access units AE 1  and AE 2 :  
         [0050]    Function 1:  
         [0051]    Detection of a defect of the partner access unit AE 1 , AE 2 , in which case it must be assumed at the defective access unit or module that the central control function zsf 2  or parts of the central control function are no longer operable.  
         [0052]    Function 2:  
         [0053]    The detection of the presence of an active redundancy module or redundancy access unit in the running or the active system. This Is necessary if for example after a repair a partner module or partner access unit of the communication system is inserted during active operation. On the basis of the hardware-based interface the inserted access unit can recognize even before its communication interface is activated to the active partner module or partner access unit whether central system resources or system interfaces may be activated on the inserted access unit.  
         [0054]    Function 3:  
         [0055]    The deactivation of external interfaces of a defective access unit or module by the redundant partner module or partner access unit. In this case the redundant, active partner module or partner access unit can initiate diagnosis functions before deactivation of the external interfaces of the partner module or partner access unit for pinpointing errors in the system. Through the deactivation of the external interfaces of a defective module or access unit an isolation of the fault state between specific fault sources can be achieved, so that the requirements for an undisturbed or possibly restricted protection switching by the partner module or partner access unit are possible.

Technology Category: 5