Patent Document

TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION 
     The invention relates to a coating preparation for pretreating metal surfaces comprising an acrylic acid or derivative thereof, a hydroxide of a bivalent metal and chromium compounds, the remainder being conventional additives and water. 
     BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 
     Such a coating preparation per se is known from U.S. Pat. No. 3,350,285. This document discloses a method for coating a metal surface, in particular a thin metal film secured to a plastic substrate used for printed wiring, by means of an immersion process or an electrolytic process, wherein an aqueous solution containing beryllium ions, chromium VI ions and a high molecular weight compound, e.g. polyvinyl alcohol and polyacrylic acid, is employed to provide a rust-proof and corrosion-resistant film on the metal surface. 
     When metals are being pretreated in preparation for a subsequent finishing process, the metal surfaces like aluminum, steel and galvanized steel usually, after having been degreased and cleaned, have applied to them, first of all, a conversion layer, followed by a so-called &#34;primer&#34; layer. The purpose of applying a conversion layer is, inter alia, to reduce corrosion phenomena of the metal and to increase the moisture resistance of the painted system. The purpose of applying a primer to the conversion layer is to provide a good bonding surface for the finish to be applied afterwards. As a result, corrosion resistance is generally increased further. 
     The use of a primer, however, entails a number of drawbacks. Firstly, it can be pointed out that any primer has a limited area of application, i.e. a primer of a particular type is not suitable for every type of finish. In addition, the solvent resistance of a primer is limited, which may result in variations in the properties, depending on the type of finish employed. Furthermore, the primer affects the flow, gloss, hardness and colour of the finish. Another drawback of employing a primer is that adhesion between finish and primer depends on the conditions under which these two are employed, such as the layer thickness and the baking temperature. A final disadvantageous factor in employing a primer is formed by the high installation costs and energy costs. 
     Thus a need for new coating preparations and methods continues to exist, wherein the disadvantages mentioned are reduced or do not occur at all. 
     A further objective of the invention is to replace the conventional conversion and primer layers by a single coating layer. 
     SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION 
     The coating preparation of the above-described type according to the present invention is characterized, to this end, in that the bivalent metal is barium and the proportion by weight of the acrylic acid or derivative thereof and barium hydroxide is 1:0.08-0.30. 
     The advantage of the aqueous coating preparation containing barium according to the invention is that the properties of a protective layer obtained thereby are better than those of conventional conversion systems, in particular corrosion resistance and adhesion, so that a primer layer is superfluous in many cases. The preparation is thus capable of replacing the conventional conversion and primer layers by a single layer. This goes hand in hand with a layer thickness which is smaller than the total layer thickness of the conventional conversion and primer layer together, which has a positive effect on subsequent processing. The drying time is considerably reduced, operating costs decrease, and also processibility of the end product, for example deformation, becomes simpler as a result. 
     In a conventional unit, in which only one coating layer can be applied, it is thus possible to achieve results which correspond to those of coating systems composed of a conversion layer, primer layer and top layer. In a conventional unit in which two coating layers, generally a primer layer and a top layer, can be applied successively, it is possible to apply, by employing the coating preparation according to the invention, a satisfactory two-layer coating system, for example a metallic coating and a transparent finish. 
     It is noted that DE-A-34 07 283 and EP-A-0 274 543 relate to the same problem and object as the present invention. However the coating preparations according to these patent applications comprise a number of components, which have been prepared by special synthesis processes and thus are expensive. In view of these known coating compositions the present preparation is relatively simple and can be easily prepared at reduced costs. 
     Furthermore the use of barium as bivalent metal offers the advantage, that barium compounds are relatively unharmful to the environment, as they are very stable compounds, which do not decompose under normal conditions. 
     DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS 
     The aqueous preparation according to the invention comprises three main components, barium hydroxide, acrylic acid or a derivative thereof, and finally chromium compounds (Cr 6+  and Cr 3+ ). The conventional additives comprise, inter alia, organic and inorganic fillers, matting agents, pigments, detergents, bactericides, other inorganic acids etc. 
     The hydroxide will partially react with the acrylic acid, as a result of which the latter is partially neutralized. If the hydroxide is present in an amount of more than 30%, based on the acrylic acid, the acrylic acid is neutralized to an excessive extent, as a result of which the dispersion breaks and a solid mass of plastic in water is formed. If less than 8% of hydroxide, based on the acrylic acid, is present in the preparation, good anticorrosion action of the preparation is not obtained, although a preparation containing, for example, 6% of hydroxide does have properties suitable for other applications, for example adhesion properties. 
     If the preparation contains much acrylic acid, the layer applied will become so thick that the fillers and pigments present therein, which increase the adhesion surface for the benefit of the finish layer, do not project from the layer, adhesion being reduced as a result. If the preparation contains little acrylic resin, the intended effect of the preparation will occur to an insufficient degree. 
     Preferably, the preparation according to the invention contains at most 6% by weight of acrylic resin or a derivative thereof, more preferably 2-6% by weight. If the preparation contains less than 2% by weight of resin, the stability of the preparation decreases. Suitable materials derived from acrylic acid are, inter alia, polymers such as polyacrylates and resins. 
     The amount of chromium compounds, of which the Cr 6+ , together with optionally present fluorides, ensures the conversion of the metal, will preferably be in the range of 0.33-0.51% by weight, based on the total weight of the preparation. Depending on the type of metal substrate, for example if applied to steel or galvanized steel, an additional amount of chromic acid (up to approximately 0.5% by weight in the preparation) may be required to etch the metal in order to optimize adhesion. This additional etching may also be carried out by means of compounds containing other acids and oxidizing components and fluoride(s). Optionally present fluorides will preferably be present in an amount of 0.05-0.13% by weight. 
     A part of the chromic acid is reduced to Cr 3+ , which increases the corrosion-inhibiting effect of the protective layer obtained with the aid of the preparation. If the concentration of chromium compounds in the preparation is outside the abovementioned range, adhesion of the coating layer to the substrate or adhesion of the finishing layer to the coating layer may be inadequate. 
     Preferably, the acrylic acid derivative employed is an acidic resin thereof. 
     A preferred composition of the preparation according to the invention for use on aluminium substrates comprises approximately 3% by weight of acrylic acid or a derivative thereof, approximately 0.72% by weight of barium hydroxide and approximately 0.42% by weight of chromium compounds. The remainder of the preparation comprises water and the abovementioned conventional additives. 
     The coating preparations according to the invention may be prepared in a conventional manner from aqueous solutions of the hydroxide and the acrylic acid. 
     A preferred embodiment of the method of preparation of the coating preparation according to the invention comprises mixing of a suitable aqueous solution of acrylic acid or a derivative thereof and a suitable amount of barium hydroxide in solid form at a temperature of between 20° and 80° C., whereupon the other conventional additives are added, in the correct amounts, to the aqueous dispersion obtained. With this method the temperature is critical, because at too low or too high a temperature the acrylate will cure. By means of this method a higher acrylic concentration can be obtained in the aqueous solution than if a hydroxide solution is mixed with an acrylic acid dispersion. 
     The invention also relates to a method for pretreating metal surfaces with the aid of the coating preparation according to the invention and to substrates obtained by means of the method. The preparation according to the invention is usually applied in such an amount to a substrate, that the dry weight of the coating layer obtained therefrom is 0.5-1.0 g/m 2 . If pigment and other fillers are present in the preparation, the dry weight may be up to approximately 3.0 g/m 2 . Most of the known application methods including spraying, rolling and immersion can be used. 
    
    
     The invention will be explained hereinafter with reference to the following examples and comparative examples. 
     EXAMPLES 
     Example 1 
     A coating preparation (PRIMECOAT 94) according to the invention was prepared by mixing the starting materials in the following amounts: 
     
         ______________________________________Amountkg/100 kg  Base material______________________________________83.92      demineralized water0.72       barium hydroxide12.00      Neocryl W-1220 (acrylate resin 25%)0.42       chromic acid2.94       additives, comprising amorphous silicate,      alcohol, dispersing adjuvant, pigment,      surfactant, fillers, fluorides and reductant______________________________________ 
    
     This preparation, when applied to a metal substrate, produces such a conversion layer that corrosion of the substrate is prevented. Additionally, the conversion layer should have such a structure that the adhesion properties are adequate for both adhesion to the substrate and to the finish. When the preparation is applied to aluminium, galvanized steel, for example Galfan and Galvalum, and to steel, a protective layer obtained therefrom replaces both the conversion layer and the primer layer. 
     If this preparation is employed on steel and zinc, in most cases an additional admixture of an etching solution, comprising inorganic acids and oxidizing components, should be employed, as has already been stated hereinabove. In the examples discussed below the additional admixture comprises 0.5% of an aqueous etching solution containing chromic acid. 
     Example 2 
     On aluminium 5050 H26 the following tests were carried out employing three different coating systems. Coating system A consisted of a yellow chromate (AD Chromate 12), the top layer being a matt polyester varnish (Polyceram 16 from HCI coatings). Such a treatment is usual in the manufacture of roof systems on coil coating lines. The baking time was approximately 30 seconds, the baking temperature 300° C. and PMT (maximum temperature reached of the substrate) was 240° C. 
     Coating system B was identical to coating system A, except that an interlayer of a polyester primer (L206 from Dynamit Nobel) had been applied between the chromating layer and the top layer. 
     Coating system C was likewise identical to coating system A, except that the yellow chromate had been replaced by a conversion layer according to the invention (PRIMECOAT 94 of EXAMPLE 1). 
     Immediately after application of the coating systems, a number of standard tests were carried out. These tests are: 
     I. Adhesion, flat, by cross-hatch test 
     II. Erichsen (8 mm) with and without cross-hatching 
     III. Adhesion with bending 
     The results are shown in Table 1. 
     
                       TABLE 1______________________________________Test results of aluminium immediately afterapplication of the coating.          Test II    Test II  Test          with cross-                     without cross-                              IIISystem Test I  hatching   hatching T0   T1  T3______________________________________A      5       4          0        0    0   5B      10      8          9        8    10  10C      10      9          10       9    10  10______________________________________ 
    
     These tests were also carried out after 2 hours&#39; boiling in demineralized water and after a salt/aqueous acetic acid spray treatment over 500 hours, respectively. The test results are shown in Tables 2 and 3. 
     
                       TABLE 2______________________________________Test results of aluminium after 2 hours&#39;boiling in demineralized water.TEST    A          B          C______________________________________I       no blisters              no blisters                         no blistersII      complete   slight     no   detachment detachment detachmentIII  T0     complete   complete formation of cracks       detachment detachment                           all the way throughT1     complete   slight   good       detachment detachmentT3     slight     good     good       detachment______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE 3______________________________________Test results of aluminium after salt/aqueousacetic acid spray treatment for 500 hours.A               B           C______________________________________SAS TEST   1-2 mm under-               approx. 1 mm                           0.5-1 mm under-   paint corrosion               underpaint cor-                           paint corrosion   approx. 40% of               rosion      approx. 20% of   scratch was approx. 20% of                           scratch was   affected    scratch was affected               affected______________________________________ 
    
     Example 3 
     Tests comparable with EXAMPLE 2 were carried out on steel employing, likewise with three different coating systems. Coating system D consisted of an iron phosphating system (AD Phosphate H60), the top layer being a matt polyester varnish (Polyceram 16 from HCI coatings). Such a treatment is usual in the manufacture of roof systems on coil coating lines. The baking time, baking temperature and PMT were identical with the values of EXAMPLE 2. 
     Coating system E was identical with coating system D, except that an interlayer of a polyester primer (L206 from Dynamit Nobel) was present. 
     Coating system F was likewise identical to coating system D, except that the iron phosphate layer had been replaced by a conversion layer according to the invention (PRIMECOAT 94). 
     Immediately after application of the coating systems, the abovementioned standard tests I-III were carried out. These standard tests are likewise shown after boiling for 2 hours in demineralized water. 
     The results are shown in Tables 4 and 5, respectively. 
     
                       TABLE 4______________________________________Test results of steel immediately afterapplication of the coating.                    Test II          Test II   without Test  Test Test          with cross-                    cross-hatch                            III   III  IIISystem Test I   hatching  ing     T0    T1   T3______________________________________D     0        0         0       0     0    0E     8        6         9       3     6    9F     10       8         10      5     8    10______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE 5______________________________________Test results of steel after 2 hours&#39; boilingin demineralized water.TEST    D          E          F______________________________________I           no blisters                  no blisters                           no blistersII          complete   slight   no       detachment detachment                           detachmentIII  T0     complete   complete formation of cracks       detachment detachment                           all the way throughT1     complete   complete good       detachment detachmentT3     slight     good     good       detachment______________________________________ 
    
     Example 4 
     On galvanized steel (0.6 mm Z100) which had been subjected to a conventional pretreatment, the following tests were carried out employing three different coating systems. Coating system G consisted of a paint (Gloss 9 according to Gardner, layer thickness 19-21 micrometers) which is normally applied on a primer and which is designed for roof systems. The baking time was approximately 35 seconds, the baking temperature 320° C. and PMT was 240° C. 
     Coating system H is the system customary in practice, comprising coating system G, an interlayer of a polyester primer (combination of L206/401 from Dynamit Nobel) was being applied. 
     Coating system K was likewise identical to coating system G, except that the conversion layer according to the invention (PRIMECOAT 94) was employed. 
     Immediately after application of the coating systems, and after 2 hours&#39; boiling in demineralized water and after a salt/aqueous acetic acid spray treatment for 1000 hours, the abovementioned standard tests were carried out. 
     The results are shown in Tables 6-8. 
     
                       TABLE 6______________________________________Test results of galvanized steel immediatelyafter application of the coating systems.                    Test II          Test II   without Test  Test Test          with cross-                    cross-hatch                            III   III  IIISystem Test I   hatching  ing     T0    T1   T3______________________________________G     0        0         0       0     0    0H     8        7         8       6     9    10K     9        8         8       7     10   10______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE 7______________________________________Test results of galvanized steel after2 hours&#39; boiling in demineralized water.TEST          G           H        K______________________________________I             no blisters no blisters                              no blisters                     slight                     softeningII            complete    slight   no         detachment  detachment                              detachmentIII    T0     unfolding of                     complete slight loss of         paint layer detachment                              adhesion  T1     unfolding of                     slight   good         paint layer detachment  T4     unfolding of                     good     good         paint layer______________________________________ 
    
     
                       TABLE 8______________________________________Test results of galvanized steel aftersalt/aqueous acetic acid spray treatment for1000 hours.G                H           K______________________________________SAS TEST   up to approx.                approx. 2 mm                            approx. 2 mm   4 mm from the                underpaint cor-                            underpaint cor-   scratch, forma-                rosion      rosion   tion of blisters                approx. 60% of                            approx. 30% of   and detachment                scratch was scratch was   took place   affected    affected______________________________________

Technology Category: 8