Datasets:
text
stringlengths 0
1.96k
|
|---|
"The evaluation consisted of two sessions (taking place one week apart) in which participants first created their passwords and then used them to sign in." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"The experiment compared BendyPass with standard PIN security feature on touchscreen devices." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Such alternative design is similar to BendyPass along many dimensions (e.g., users need to carry an additional device, but offers a more familiar interface)." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"I reviewed the previous submission as R2." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"The paper doesn't even acknowledge that this lack of success could simply be due to a lower external validity than the authors hoped for" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Checking can also come up negative, and that is ok." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"In the example given in p. 1 (choosing between 5 or 7-mm circular icons), it is unclear why the designer would need a model, or to know by how much a 7-mm icon would improve accuracy" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The level of detail argued here seems quite artificial , e.g. ""If designers want a hyperlink to have a 77% success rate""." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"CLARITY Removing tap points that are further than a fixed distance away from the target center will likely affect W levels differently." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Looking at table 1 makes me think these instructions are quite clear on how to make these 3 patterns." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"This might have affected the metric, with no real impact on the perceived result." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Second, I particularly appreciate the authors' use of different methods (focus group, interviews, and observation) but fail to see an understanding of the needed sensitivity towards participants with some form of a chronic condition" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The authors perform three phases: An interview with providers to assess their needs, sessions with patients to gather their unique medical history and develop several visualizations for their data, and going back to providers with these visualizations to gather their ideas of how well these visualizations would assist them." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"I also think that the overall motivation of understanding whether interfaces with distinct visual and motor widths (to use the paper's terms) is interesting" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"Finally, I found the study results to be difficult to interpret , as many of the results subsections are ANOVA output with little interpretation and commentary to help the reader understand what was found" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Based on the above, I feel the paper is marginally below the acceptance threshold." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"How likely are designers of 3D objects to include such ""internal faces""; is this common?" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"The approach is interesting and the use cases described demonstrate the technique well" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"I had to re read the paper back and forward to finally tease out what I think is the way it works" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"IN fact, the whole way the user draws the shape is poorly described" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"These critical areas of confusion around how the process actually unfolds from start to finish should have been more clearly described" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"I found it odd that at the authors retained both metrics, delivering different results, without trying some blended version that might reduce complexity for the user" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"It sounds like a classic case of theres nothing wrong with our system, just change the user" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Because of that last point, I am somewhat on the fence about this paper, but am willing to consider that it might be acceptable." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Quality The methodology employed for conducting this research sources methods from diverse fields and is relevant" "['non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"The passive voice of the sentence does not help to identify who posited this reason : the authors of the submission or Vieira et al. [36]?" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"The choice for visualizing rotation schedules using an interval chart rather than a more space-consuming Gantt chart widespread in time/project management is smart" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"I would suggest the following references to inform analysis of user logs : - H. Guo, S. R. Gomez, C. Ziemkiewicz and D. H. Laidlaw, ""A Case Study Using Visualization Interaction Logs and Insight Metrics to Understand How Analysts Arrive at Insights,"" in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 51-60, 31 Jan." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE WORK The limitations are mainly focused on the specificity of project requirements to one University in Canada, the small sample size of participants to evaluations." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Audio quality of the voice over could be improved with a proper microphone and recording settings." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Experiments have shown that the convergence speed and results are improved, but not significant" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The contribution is minor, and the reasoning behind it could be better motivated" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The appendix includes some tests in this direction , but conclusions should not be based on material that is only available in the appendix" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"The second point is the motivation of the split approach: it seems in direct contradiction with the ""disentangled"" and ""compact"" demands the authors pose" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Please indicate why these tasks are chosen." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"I realize that they were obtained with a simple network, however, showing improvements in this regime is not that convincing" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"I would expect at least the following baselines : i) use normal large batch training and complicated data augmentation, train the model for same number of epochs ii) use normal large batch training and complicated data augmentation, train the model for same number of iterations ii) use normal large batch training and complicated data augmentation, scale the learning rate up as in Goyal et al. 2017 4." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Like the authors said, they did not propose new data augmentation method, and their contribution is how to combine data augmentation with large-batch training." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"However, I am not convinced by the experiments that the good performance is from the proposed method, not from the N times more augmented samples" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"However, the authors quote a previous paper that use different data augmentation and (potentially) other experimental settings." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Please provide variance measures on your results (within model configuration, across scene examples)." "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Unified pragmatic models for generating and following instructions." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Section 3.3 is confusing to me" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"Although the concept of normalizing flow is simple, and it has been applied to other models such as VAE , there seems no work on applying it for policy optimization" "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"It is meant to generate overall images as image slice sequences with memory and computation economy by using a Multidimensional Upscaling method." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"Figure 5 is referenced in the main text after figure 6" "['con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"This paper proposes the deep reinforcement learning with ensembles of Q-functions." "['non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non', 'non']" "paper quality" |
"This paper is well-written" "['pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
"I think more examples, such as in section 8.1, should be put in the main text" "['non', 'non', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con', 'con']" "paper quality" |
"STRENGTHS + Decoupling instruction-to-action mapping by introducing goals as a learned intermediate representation has advantages, particularly for goal-directed instructions" "['non', 'non', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro', 'pro']" "paper quality" |
End of preview. Expand
in Dataset Viewer.
Argument Mining in Scientific Reviews (AMSR)
We release a new dataset of peer-reviews from different computer science conferences with annotated arguments, called AMSR (Argument Mining in Scientific Reviews).
Raw Data conferences_raw/ contains directories for each conference we scraped (e.g., iclr20). The respective directory of each conference comprises multiple
*.jsonfiles, where every file contains the information belonging to a single paper, such as the title, the abstract, the submission date and the reviews. The reviews are stored in a list called"review_content".Cleaned Data conferences_cleaned/ contains reviews and papers where we removed all unwated character sequences from the reviews. For details on the details of the preprocessing steps, please refer to our paper "Argument Mining Driven Analysis of Peer-Reviews".
Annotated Data conferences_annotated/ contains sentence_level and token_level data of 77 reviews, annotated each by 3 annotators. We have three labels: PRO - Arguments supporting the acceptance of the paper. CON - Arguments opposing the acceptance of the paper. NON - Non-argumentative sentences/tokens which have no influence on the acceptance of the paper.
And following we have three tasks:
Argumentation Detection: A binary classification of whether a text span is an argument. The classes are denoted by ARG and NON, where ARG is the union of PRO and CON classes.
Stance Detection: A binary classification whether an argumentative text span is supporting or opposing the paper acceptance. he model is trained and evaluated only on argumentative PRO and CON text spans.
Joint Detection: A multi-class classification between the classes PRO, CON and NON, i.e. the combination of argumentation and stance detection.
- Generalization across Conferences conferences_annotated_generalization/ contains token_level data of 77 reviews split diffrently than in 3.
We studied the model’s generalization to peer-reviews for papers from other (sub)domains.
To this end, wereduce the test set to only contain reviews from the GI’20conference.
The focus of the GI’20 conference is ComputerGraphics and Human-Computer Interaction, while the otherconferences are focused on Representation Learning, AI andMedical Imaging.
We consider the GI’20 as a subdomain since all conferences are from the domain of computer science.
NO-GI:
The original training dataset with all sentences from reviews of GI’20 removed.
ALL
A resampling of the original training dataset of the same size as NO-GI, with sentences from all conferences.
- jupyter-Notebook ReviewStat is a jupyter notebook, which shows interesting statistics of the raw dataset.
- Downloads last month
- 0