[ { "action": "opened", "author": "d4mation", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1472089995000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "The Public Version would fall short of other services like http://pokedextracker.com if it has no way to share the completion progress with another Users.\r\n\r\nGET parameters may be a way to get around this, provided it doesn't get too long.\r\n\r\nIt would be static, but better than nothing. Unfortunately that's the downside to not having a central database ¯\\\\\\_(ツ)\\_/¯\r\n\r\nBuilding on #3", "title": "Ability to Share Views for Public Version", "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "newmanw", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1461286650000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Awesome library, thanks so much.\n\nWondering if you have considered a way to 'clear' a search. Currently when you search and a location is found a marker is added to the map. The search form is cleared but the marker remains, leaving no way to clear the maker. Thoughts on an option to leave search results in the box with a clear icon or 'x' in the form that would clear the current search text and the marker from the map?", "title": "Feature: Possible to clear a search and search marker.", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "smeijer", "comment_id": 303499465, "datetime": 1495566095000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Closed by #123 \r\n\r\n", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "smeijer", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1495566096000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "colinjcotter", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1467629589000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "A few improvements:\r\n\r\n(1) The embedded DG __init__ method should build the broken element function space\r\n(2) A Projector should be used to speed this up.", "title": "Improvements to embedded DG", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "wence-", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1468503498000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "wence-", "comment_id": 232667615, "datetime": 1468503498000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Both of these were addressed in #51. Which is now merged. Although I note in passing that the `BrokenElement` approach for building the DG space will not work automagically in all cases. If you pass a `VectorFunctionSpace` in, for example, it will fail.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jshipton", "comment_id": 232669203, "datetime": 1468503838000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Yes, I'm just adding in testing and making an fail for the vector case.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 209, "repo": "st2workroom", "user_login": "StackStorm" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "jfryman", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1445455183000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "This PR adds HTTP Proxy support to the AIO installer via Hiera. Relies on the behavior to soucre `/etc/environment`, all supported systems do either natively or via system init scripts.", "title": "add HTTP Proxy support to AIO", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "DoriftoShoes", "comment_id": 150001251, "datetime": 1445455688000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "+1", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "crhino", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1433969604000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Doing some performance testing on the new CF Routing API, we found that under high load (~200 concurrent requests), the Watch function was missing a large amount of events. This translated into a long wait time for propagating routes from the API to the GoRouter. We spiked on adding a channel to the call and it improved performance dramatically.\r\n\r\nIs there a reason why the current implementation does not use a channel to receive events from the etcd client?\r\n\r\n\r\n@username_0 && @ebabani", "title": "Etcd Watch does not pass in a channel to etcd.Client.Watch()", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "crhino", "comment_id": 110942627, "datetime": 1433977640000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "https://gist.github.com/username_0/96f2b76bc275b7726671\r\n\r\nThat is a diff of our changes for the spike. We tried to preserve the same behavior, although two tests were failing.\r\n```\r\nIt(\"skips the missing event history and eventually catches up\"\r\nIt(\"should write to the error channel\"\r\n```\r\n\r\nThe error channel failure was because the etcd.client.Watch() closes the recvChan as well as returning an error, so there was a race condition about which case of the select statement would be triggered. The missing events history seems more relevant.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "ematpl", "comment_id": 110943087, "datetime": 1433977716000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@onsi Do you know if there was a specific rationale behind always doing a one-off watch instead of passing a channel into the go-etcd client's Watch method? @vito and I looked through the commit history and we didn't see anything obvious. The only things I can think of are that it avoids creating another goroutine to handle receiving the etcd Response instances on a channel and transforming them storeadapter WatchEvent instances and may simplify the error case handling.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "ematpl", "comment_id": 110947821, "datetime": 1433979979000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_0 Might also be related to https://github.com/coreos/go-etcd/issues/83, which was fixed in https://github.com/coreos/go-etcd/pull/108, and motivated https://github.com/cloudfoundry/storeadapter/commit/e6225ebbfbd3e6f60b2a974da6052b81fa4d819a.\r\n\r\n@username_2 might have additional historical context?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "fraenkel", "comment_id": 110991742, "datetime": 1433994459000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "I fear you are trying to have a guarantee that can't ever be met with Watch. While you are seeing more of the events, eventually you will hit the next threshold that starts to miss the actual events.\r\n\r\nThe changes are fine. I don't know why someone didn't switch over to this call form. My guess is that it got lost waiting for the PR. There are some improvements that could be made like using the 2 form case on the select to determine the channel is closed rather than a nil value.\r\n\r\nThe reason why the first test fails is because you are receiving watch events from etcd when the events channel is blocked whereas the current code doesn't bother to do any watches if the events channel is all backed up. You have probably one extra event before it all backs up. My guess is by making events buffered, you would have seen a similar improvement.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "ematpl", "comment_id": 112223709, "datetime": 1434406052000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_0 && @ebabani, if you're interested in submitting a PR to improve watch performance, we'd likely pull it in.\r\n\r\nThanks,\r\nEric", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "ematpl", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1436817678000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "ematpl", "comment_id": 121038369, "datetime": 1436817678000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Closing due to inactivity.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "simonlogicspot", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1455537391000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "There seems to be a conflict between _merge-conflicts_ and [_EditorConfig_](https://github.com/sindresorhus/atom-editorconfig). \r\n\r\nWhen the latter is enabled _merge-conflicts_ successfully detects conflicts, but when you click into a file the GUI elements are not present.", "title": "Doesn't work when EditorConfig is enabled", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "simonlogicspot", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1455538442000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "simonlogicspot", "comment_id": 184192040, "datetime": 1455540505000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Closing as I was mistaken in thinking it was a conflict with this particular package. \r\n\r\nThis is related to issue [#196](https://github.com/smashwilson/merge-conflicts/issues/196)", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "Petrouchka", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1444561264000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I installed JITSI jitsi-2.9.5477-x86.msi on fresh legal Windows XP Pro SP3 french version and jitsi-2.9.5477-x64.msi on Windows 7 Pro french version, in VirtualBox. After the installation, JITSI doesn't start, there's a message \"NimbuzzAvatars\" and nothing else.\r\n\r\n\r\nDeleting the directory %userprofile%\\.sip-communicator doesn't solve it. I restart with initial snapshot of Windows and had again the same problem.\r\n\r\nSame problem with 2.9.5478 version but jitsi-2.8.5426 stable version works fine.", "title": "Jitsi doesn't start, message \"NimbuzzAvatars\"", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "ibauersachs", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1444562343000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "ibauersachs", "comment_id": 147184021, "datetime": 1444562343000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Duplicate of #162.\r\nPlease don't open issue after issue. You already violated our rules the first time by not asking on the mailing list first. You can comment on the first issue.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Petrouchka", "comment_id": 147184903, "datetime": 1444563463000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I opened a new issue because you closed my first issue as it was solved and without waiting my answer to your suggestion. Now, you closed my second issue without trying to answer to me and the issue isn't solved. Congratulations !\r\nI will not waste my time anymore to test JITSI and making issues if you don't matter. And I will less use the mailing list before.\r\nI will simply use another software that works, free or not.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "jeffh", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1456650996000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "It would be super useful to provide a README template for swift libraries that includes:\r\n\r\n- [ ] Placeholder to put project name + description\r\n- [ ] How to install via\r\n - [ ] Cocoapods\r\n - [ ] Carthage\r\n - [ ] Swift Package Manager\r\n - [ ] Manually - it might be useful to link to a dedicated page that breaks down the steps\r\n- [ ] Placeholder to put code examples", "title": "Documentation: Add README template", "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "rightaway", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1447498736000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "If `Logger.prototype.clear` returned `this` then it could be chained like `winston.clear().add(winston.transports.Console, { ... })` which is especially useful when using the default logger.", "title": "Logger.prototype.clear should return 'this' for chaining", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "pose", "comment_id": 169787419, "datetime": 1452196233000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_0 I see your point but we won't be changing the `winston@2.x` API in that direction. Thanks anyway!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "pose", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1452196233000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "indexzero", "comment_id": 169902667, "datetime": 1452231937000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_0 `winston@3` will not add a console logger by default.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "hgschmie", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1406760374000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "http://stackoverflow.com/questions/15886209/maven-is-not-working-in-java-8-when-javadoc-tags-are-incomplete\r\n\r\n <configuration>\r\n <additionalparam>-Xdoclint:none</additionalparam>\r\n </configuration>\r\n\r\nunder java 8 profile", "title": "java 8 javadoc lint", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "hgschmie", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1425960453000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 48, "repo": "recog", "user_login": "rapid7" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "pdeardorff-r7", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1430413216000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Change to a regex that was causing this warning \r\n`recog-1.0.27/lib/recog/fingerprint/regexp_factory.rb:33: warning: nested repeat operator '+' and '?' was replaced with '*' in regular expression`\r\n\r\n#47", "title": "Change redundant ? to * fixes rapid7/recog#47", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "pdeardorff-r7", "comment_id": 98297545, "datetime": 1430538456000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Should be good to go now, I added back the `?:` so it won't capture the subsequent groups. Out of curiosity I found the warning is coming from here: https://github.com/ruby/ruby/blob/trunk/regparse.c#L5420 but I couldn't find out how it's able to remove the redundancy and replace with `*`.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "jrweakland", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1420233344000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@elinz copied a new build of the Message Simulator exe to the NSECGEE server (i.e. C:\\MessageSimulator\\MessageSimulator). He also created the OS Scheduled task and left it in a disabled state. He didn’t copy over any of the message files from the last Ops Server release, because he wanted someone to review all the files before we deploy message files to the new geography GEE server (NSECGEE), but everything else for the Message Simulator is now on the server.", "title": "Simulation files need to be reviewed prior to moving to the NSEC GEE server", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jrweakland", "comment_id": 91420913, "datetime": 1428638320000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_2 - added to backlog: https://app.asana.com/0/22926133759983/31304190918338", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jrweakland", "comment_id": 141817644, "datetime": 1442773367000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_2 - has the been any movement on this issue?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "conklinbd", "comment_id": 144458835, "datetime": 1443628707000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_2 My impression is that this issue is resolved.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jrweakland", "comment_id": 144462588, "datetime": 1443629269000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": ":+1: Agreed.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "pHill5136", "comment_id": 144467422, "datetime": 1443630462000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@ScottCecilio reviewed the land ops sim files for friendly equipment and hostile equipment over monterey airport area.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "jrweakland", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1443634140000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 1, "repo": "words", "user_login": "yabwe" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "nmielnik", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1454650426000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Make sure the JSON data structure is updated correctly whenever multiple characters are deleted at once.\r\n\r\nThis means merging together lingering words and/or blocks that may have been fragmented by the deleted characters.\r\n\r\nThis also covers pasting in chracters as replacements (doing a delete by highlighting a selection and pasting in new stuff)", "title": "Handle deletes correctly in JSON representation", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "nmielnik", "comment_id": 180207461, "datetime": 1454650700000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Might want to do a bit more cleanup here...", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 4117, "repo": "gratipay.com", "user_login": "gratipay" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1472595089000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Stub out a PR for changes.\r\n\r\nRelated milestones:\r\n- IG: https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/milestone/9\r\n- G: https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/milestone/22", "title": "Edit TOS to decouple payins and payouts", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 243851810, "datetime": 1472667159000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "The way this reads to me is that TWYW is not required, only optional.\r\n\r\nThat leaves the open work descriptions. Are we loosening \"open\" to mean \"transparent\" (as in https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432#issuecomment-243245667)? If so, how do we allow Level 0--is it enough that the _goal_ of Gratipay is to encourage Level 0 Teams to increase openness?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 243877631, "datetime": 1472672543000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "If I get a chance I'll try to work Levels 1-3 in there, otherwise anyone else is welcome to try.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 243896973, "datetime": 1472676625000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Or do we drop \"open\" entirely, and leave that under [brand fit](http://inside.gratipay.com/big-picture/brand/), with the intention of later separately adding in official support for levels of openness for teams that are approved under brand fit?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 243957439, "datetime": 1472696252000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Closing in. Need to define \"Take-What-You-Want\" payouts, or leave TWYW out and leave payout method open-ended.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 243957895, "datetime": 1472696451000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "from https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432#issuecomment-243937519.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 244083448, "datetime": 1472737600000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I think we can leave TWYW out of the TOS.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "kaguillera", "comment_id": 247082598, "datetime": 1473872519000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Looks good to me...do have to get it cleared by our legal department 😉 before we merge this??", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 247085806, "datetime": 1473873139000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Yeah, we said we'd [send a version](https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432#issuecomment-243522286) to look at. I think the idea is to get all the Decouple PRs ready to go and then merge them all at once (this milestone spans multiple repos, otherwise I imagine we could do it as one PR).", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "kaguillera", "comment_id": 247116933, "datetime": 1473879139000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "I figured that we would have wanted to finish the Decouple PR before making this public...so I guess this is blocked for now then.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248292101, "datetime": 1474375922000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Rebased on latest master. Previous head was f8d5a22f2d66d1e846962a3b554cd3ea3571c58c.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248297216, "datetime": 1474377181000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Hmmm ... so \"Teams\" doesn't really fit anymore, is one thing. That made sense when we required open work, but for \"teams of one\" shouldn't we just call them something besides teams?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248300201, "datetime": 1474377927000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Maybe \"Project\" instead of Team?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 248302498, "datetime": 1474378441000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "\"Project\" seems pretty standard and self-explanatory. Does it cover \"teams of one\" who do multiple things? E.g., \"Alice's Truckstop, Shoe Repair, and Gumball Factory\" isn't a \"project,\" it's another type of entity.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248302790, "datetime": 1474378509000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "\"Organization\"? \"Receiver\"?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248303414, "datetime": 1474378657000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "When a team of one signs up, they don't want to sign up twice (Participant and Team). They want to sign up once and start accepting payments. Hmm ...", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248304250, "datetime": 1474378846000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Do we wanna get into https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/issues/3852 here?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248304761, "datetime": 1474378965000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "On the other hand, we do have bbatsov with ~~three~~ four(!) teams:\r\n\r\nhttp://gratipay.com/~bbatsov\r\n\r\nhttps://gratipay.com/cider/\r\nhttps://gratipay.com/rubocop/\r\nhttps://gratipay.com/Prelude/\r\nhttps://gratipay.com/Projectile/\r\n\r\nThat's a pretty clear \"person\" and \"project\" distinction.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248305788, "datetime": 1474379207000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "At one point I think I suggested \"Brand\" as the thing that receives money. Would that cover CIDER as well as Alice's TS & G?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248306600, "datetime": 1474379394000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "The Participant is really about the _legal_ entity, the \"Alice Enterprises, LLC\" that is _DBA_ \"Alice's Truckstop, Shoeshine, and Gumballs\"", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 248306904, "datetime": 1474379456000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "bbatsov seems to have made the explicit choice to [do what we intended and] make a team for each project.\r\n\r\nWe have at least a few people under \"blocked by 432\" like https://github.com/gratipay/team-review/issues/122. Some of the comments on those teams have been \"I don't even know if any of my tiny repos are going somewhere, so why set up a team for each one?\"", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248307291, "datetime": 1474379541000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Except that the Participant _does_ also have a social (brand) identity, especially once we get into https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/issues/236.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248311733, "datetime": 1474380461000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Well, I don't think we want to get into a deep rabbit hole trying to change our database model here (like trying to fold Teams back into Participants).", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248312342, "datetime": 1474380583000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Renaming \"Team\" to \"Project\" would still take some work, but not as much.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248315990, "datetime": 1474381343000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "As I skim through the team review tickets that are [blocked on 432](https://github.com/gratipay/team-review/labels/Blocked%20on%20432), I am reminded that our purpose here is to remove friction in our receiver onboarding. We've got the dial tuned too high, we need to relax it a bit. Yes, that will create pressure in terms of anti-fraud ([cf.](https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/820#issuecomment-247396054)) and brand fit tension, but that goes hand in hand with growth!\r\n\r\nI think we could maybe rename \"Teams\" to something else, but I don't think we should countenance folding Teams back into Participants. That would be more trouble than it's worth.\r\n\r\n\"Projects\" might work. Even with larger orgs like Wikipedia, Mozilla, or Archive.org, the distinction between the parent entity and their projects seems to make sense:\r\n\r\nWikimedia &rarr; https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Our_projects\r\nMozilla Foundation &rarr; Firefox\r\nArchive.org &rarr; https://archive.org/projects/", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248317705, "datetime": 1474381679000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "The main thing I think skimming through those blocked on 432 is, \"I don't want to think about this. I wish I could just approve these folks and move on.\" The next thing I think is that I _do_ want to promote certain teams/projects/whatever more than others. But that's separate (some kind of \"verified\" program or \"tiers\" like we've [talked](https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/432#issuecomment-167126987) about).", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248318233, "datetime": 1474381778000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Or we go a Facebook-ish route and have _multiple_ types.\r\n\r\n\r\n", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248319813, "datetime": 1474382089000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Or don't introduce multiple types, but call them \"Pages.\"", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 248326777, "datetime": 1474383405000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "So you set up a \"Page\" to receive money?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248328071, "datetime": 1474383638000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Maybe? Which do you like better, Projects or Pages?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248329579, "datetime": 1474383909000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "One can view projects as temporary (rather than permanent) social systems or as work systems that are constituted by teams within or across organizations to accomplish particular tasks under time constraints. An ongoing project is usually called (or evolves into) a program.\r\n\r\nhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project\r\n\r\nHmm ... \"open-source project\" is permanent tho ...", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248329925, "datetime": 1474383975000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "What's the smallest change we can make in order to close gratipay/gratipay.com#432? I think it might be Team &rarr; Project.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248332112, "datetime": 1474384387000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "I'm into a revision over here, also dealing with an asymmetry between payins and payouts in the current terms ... commit forthcoming ...", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 248347530, "datetime": 1474387307000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Sounds great.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248397668, "datetime": 1474397689000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Okay! Revision made. In reviewing it through the web here, don't forget about GitHub's \"rich diff\" option for Markdown files.\r\n\r\n", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248398637, "datetime": 1474397902000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "I think we're ready to run this by Aaron (our lawyer), ya?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 248404704, "datetime": 1474399285000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Sounds good.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 248406883, "datetime": 1474399659000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Thanks, Aaron! :)", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 249572923, "datetime": 1474897404000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Let me know what you think about these suggestions and we'll go from there.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 250775993, "datetime": 1475249553000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "- [ ] come up with an alias for Participants acting as contributors, so that we're never using \"Participant\" in a context-dependent way\r\n- [ ] more clearly describe the differences between these various roles up from (and clarify that each is a Participant interacting with the platform in a different way)\r\n- [ ] revise the individual sections (e.g. the new 3-5) such that each is limited to describing the obligations of one role. So one section for Owners, one for Participant-contributors, and one for Members\r\n- [ ] rename \"Owners\" and \"Members\" to \"Project Owners\" and \"Project Members.\" \"Members\" in particular is ambiguous -- since \"members,\" \"participants,\" and \"users\" could all potentially be used interchangeably in common speech, people may get confused trying to keep them straight when reading through the terms.\r\n- [x] Probably use different language for the \"Work\" performed by the project and the work performed by Members for Projects \r\n - Tried to address in https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/pull/4117/commits/01e8cb2aa068706354023a7d93e0d74a7f7f8e2e", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 250780134, "datetime": 1475250504000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I'll try to go through this again to see how it reads.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 250798448, "datetime": 1475255084000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I think it's ready for review again.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 250886083, "datetime": 1475287327000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Looks awesome on first skim, more later ...", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 251942851, "datetime": 1475755607000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "We're [finding new counsel](https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/842), which affects this. It's probable that we'll have _two_ lawyers, one for general corporate and contract issues (and quite comfortable with open source), and one for financial regulatory compliance. I think our process here will then be something like:\r\n\r\n1. Have the finance lawyer review our current position to level-set, make sure we did okay during the Gratipocalypse (Aaron was learning on the fly, after all).\r\n1. Work through this PR with the corporate/contract lawyer.\r\n1. Run the new terms by the finance lawyer one more time.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 252655352, "datetime": 1476113056000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Sounds good for new counsel to look it over in order to be familiar.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 255418200, "datetime": 1477066077000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Incorporate https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/857 as part of this to bundle lawyering time?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 255532384, "datetime": 1477147349000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "We have a lawyer!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 255532427, "datetime": 1477147393000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Rebased onto latest master. Previous head was d7437c5a9c042cbdbf18762dcafc350a27f7dc8a.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 255532453, "datetime": 1477147423000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "How about \"Collaborators\" instead of \"Project Members\"?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 255541195, "datetime": 1477156565000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Alright, @username_0, I think I'm about good here. You okay with my latest commits? If so then I think we're ready for @username_3's input! :)", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 255547923, "datetime": 1477163579000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "LGTM. :+1:", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 255551182, "datetime": 1477167250000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_0 Cool, I've emailed @username_3 with links to here and the private ticket as well.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 256237120, "datetime": 1477450757000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Let me know what you think about these and we can go from there.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 256509649, "datetime": 1477525850000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Okay! We're in a bit of a triage situation [tonight and tomorrow](https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/757#issuecomment-256509327). If I make it far enough on the coding on https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/issues/4148 tonight, I will likely try to incorporate the \"start with\" suggestions into https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/issues/4117 and land that tomorrow. Then we can pick up the rest next week.\r\n\r\nAt this point the most likely scenario is that I _won't_ get far enough tonight, and so we won't have the urgency tomorrow to land this.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 258883187, "datetime": 1478535845000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Need to think a little more.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 258925703, "datetime": 1478544594000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "This is about the agreement between Project and Collaborator, and is addressed in https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/pull/4117/commits/8ee27be9186c23321d8c44751251d6e382b9d659. I changed it to say that a Collaborator forms the agreement when they become a Collaborator (i.e., when they are added to the Project).\r\n\r\nQuestion: @username_3 questions the specifics of the agreement between Project and Giver, but not between Project and Collaborator. Is this an oversight, or is there a difference in these relationships? (@username_3 can't answer publicly, I'm just adding this here to batch with any additional questions we may have before finishing this up.)", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 259044238, "datetime": 1478580047000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_0 I've topped up my [private thread](https://github.com/gratipay/legal/issues/32) with @username_3 where we're sorting out the privilege question regarding public v. private discussions. Ideally he and you can work on this without me being a bottleneck. Two caveats:\r\n\r\n- I'd like a chance for final review before we go live.\r\n- @username_3 Can you get us a project cost for this, so we can plan our cashflow?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 259154469, "datetime": 1478616231000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I wouldn't have it any other way.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "tieguy", "comment_id": 260426822, "datetime": 1479149774000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "Hey, @username_2 - sorry for the slow response, was doing some election-related work last week.\r\n\r\nHappy as usual to work on a fixed basis, but not sure what you're asking me to cover in this one - all the outstanding questions here, or...?\r\n\r\n@username_0 : I was just doing a first pass when I asked that first round of questions. I will take another look at the Project/Collaborator relationship.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 260450683, "datetime": 1479154862000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Thanks @username_3!\r\n\r\n@username_2, once you're satisfied we can work out a plan for rolling out [Decouple](https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/milestone/22).", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 261156479, "datetime": 1479359100000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Rebased on master. Previous head was a270ed00b241db93a9d2188c3cfa02a637ac25be.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 261173909, "datetime": 1479367294000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_3 Our immediate objective in relaxing the \"Open Work\" requirement in our terms is to reduce the friction in our onboarding process. Our two bigger-picture objectives are:\r\n\r\n1. to relieve ourselves (primarily @username_0) of review busywork, and\r\n1. to make possible growth initiatives such as https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/issues/4148 and https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/436.\r\n\r\nDo you see significant work remaining in order to meet these objectives? If so, let's talk about the scope of that work and a price. If not, then let's (stay hourly and) bring this in for a landing! :flight_arrival: 💃", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 261262567, "datetime": 1479393446000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Hmm ... I can't quite shake the feeling that it _is_ entangled.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 261586210, "datetime": 1479489023000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Okay, feeling shaken. 🏀 is in your court, @username_3 @username_0!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 261970571, "datetime": 1479742355000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I like https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/commit/52b096a267a52b6e8b1cac06cbabd014b3442798 because it removes the brand guidelines from review. It may be controversial, but I'm not sure of a better way to put it. It _does_ put the onus on Gratipay in terms of being fair about what constitutes \"aggressive,\" \"trolling,\" and \"activism,\" but that wouldn't be different if captured under the brand guidelines. It's probably the closest we can come to saying \"Be a good community member (that means don't be a jerk).\"\r\n\r\nThe other changes look fine to me.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "tieguy", "comment_id": 262027416, "datetime": 1479753545000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "I don't think this should be significant - less than an hour unless something unexpected crops up. I'll start diving in to the rebase now.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "tieguy", "comment_id": 262040652, "datetime": 1479756410000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "General comment: looks good. Let me know if any of the comments I left inline don't make sense.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 262075584, "datetime": 1479764397000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Awesome, thanks @username_3!\r\n\r\nBumping out of the Review queue.\r\n\r\n@username_0 This is in your TODO, ya?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 262080669, "datetime": 1479765514000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "To fix more, yes?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 262081601, "datetime": 1479765726000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Yes! To incorporate the latest from @username_3.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 262081662, "datetime": 1479765742000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_0 You on it?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 262139013, "datetime": 1479785749000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "At the risk of stirring the pot, I just discovered https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/204 while combing through our issue backlog. It'd be nice to close that along with this.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 262273778, "datetime": 1479828988000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Made lawyerly changes, will look at https://github.com/gratipay/inside.gratipay.com/issues/204 when I have a chance.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 262336157, "datetime": 1479842002000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 262681019, "datetime": 1479957320000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Ready for review again.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "tieguy", "comment_id": 263328887, "datetime": 1480352624000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "- [ ] Re Sec. 11.i (\"state laws\"), I've opened gratipay/inside.gratipay.com#925 for this.\r\n- [ ] Sec. 9 still looks incorrectly indented.\r\n- [ ] Left one review request.\r\n\r\nOtherwise looks good to go.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 263393055, "datetime": 1480366929000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Made changes except for #925, to which I don't know the answer.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 263424404, "datetime": 1480374567000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Ready for a @username_2 review again.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 263657453, "datetime": 1480444542000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Lessee here ...", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 263661744, "datetime": 1480445438000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "I've rebased on master (previous head was 526d7a94c3095f79ef2301498ba4025a0218d2c6), and added a commit to reflow per Vim for consistency. Now going through https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/compare/67c8b0c5104cdaac7e840a8b261dcafcc076402a...7f8cdd8646fc9ddda49ce1341a861b94eeeadebd ...", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 263687860, "datetime": 1480451046000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Alright, I made a pass through! Hopefully we are converging? :-)\r\n\r\nHere's the [diff](https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/compare/7f8cdd8646fc9ddda49ce1341a861b94eeeadebd...2594b15ab4fc12c9000b7e05e9be2e11534b356f?short_path=7808a32) with my latest changes. Amidst some tinkering, the two main changes to look for are:\r\n\r\n1. Further standardization of the \"can {make,receive} payments ... because of ... and for no other reason\" paragraphs.\r\n1. Removal of inaccurate terms regarding escrow. This is a [rabbit](https://github.com/gratipay/gratipay.com/issues/1383) [hole](https://github.com/gratipay/legal/issues/10) we can't go down right now, but the terms as they stood were simply inaccurate to how we operate today.\r\n\r\nBack to you @username_3 @username_0! 🏀", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 263732075, "datetime": 1480461545000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I have no comments.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "tieguy", "comment_id": 263750099, "datetime": 1480467383000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "For some reason github is not letting me comment inline, so just a few\nquick points:\n - I find the sentence that defines the Work to be quite awkward now. If\nyou don't like where it was, I might just remove the \"may establish a\nproject\" phrase altogether; that's less a part of the agreement and more a\nfeature of the service, so I don't think it needs to be in the TOS at all.\n- If you don't like \"may only\" in the discussion of making payments, can I\nsuggest \"solely\"? (\"solely because of their collaboration...\", dropping the\n\"for no other reason\".\n\nOtherwise looks good.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 263758615, "datetime": 1480470536000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Am I missing a difference between 3.ii and 4.ii that explains why we wouldn't want them to be parallel with each other one way or another?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "tieguy", "comment_id": 263954383, "datetime": 1480530637000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "No explanation for the inconsistency re \"for no other reason\", purely that\non re-read in fuller context I realized my own phrasing was somewhat\nawkward. Fine to leave in the earlier phrasing.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 263977273, "datetime": 1480535726000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_3 Gotcha. In that case, how about e54930312216e6d33a3934291fe1c164b804edc9? :-)", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 263989032, "datetime": 1480538506000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Woo-hoo! Don't look now @username_3 @username_0 et al., but I'm pretty sure we just finished this PR! 🙀", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mattbk", "comment_id": 264287595, "datetime": 1480624640000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Good job! Three months to the day. :grin:", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "whit537", "comment_id": 264566616, "datetime": 1480713941000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Congratulations @username_3 @username_0! We've landed this PR! 💃 \r\n\r\nIt's now merged into an integration branch under #4221, whence it will go into master and out into production.\r\n\r\nGreat work! 👏 😄\r\n\r\n!m @username_3 @username_0", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "ikeyat", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1474007861000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "## Description\r\nSome libraries such as Jadira Usertype are not managed by Spring IO Platform.\r\nThose are managed by TERASOLUNA Framework as follows.\r\nhttps://github.com/terasolunaorg/terasoluna-gfw/blob/master/terasoluna-gfw-parent/pom.xml#L414\r\n\r\nThere are some libraries to be updated. Need to be investigated!\r\n\r\n## Possible Solutions\r\n- [ ] Check the status of each that library\r\n- [ ] Check the necessity of the version up (dependencies of others, critical bugs, security patch, etc...)\r\n- [ ] Update our parent pom.xml\r\n- [ ] Reflect the changes to the guideline\r\n\r\nNote: \r\n- MyBatis libraries are managed separately at #555. This issue focus on other minor libraries.\r\n- Libraries covered by Spring IO PF are managed separately at #563\r\n\r\n## Affects Version/s\r\n* 5.2.0.RELEASE\r\n* ~5.1.1.RELEASE\r\n* ~5.0.2.RELEASE\r\n* ~1.0.5.RELEASE\r\n\r\n## Fix Version/s\r\n- [ ] 5.3.0\r\n- [ ] 5.2.1 (if required)\r\n- [ ] 5.1.1 (if required)\r\n- [ ] 5.0.3 (if required)\r\n- [ ] 1.0.6 (if required)\r\n\r\n## Issue Links\r\n* #563\r\n* #555", "title": "Update minor OSS libraries not managed Spring IO PF", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "ikeyat", "comment_id": 247529081, "datetime": 1474007968000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "For the update of Spring IO PF Athens, Jadira Usertype should be update to more than 5.0.0.GA because pre-existing ver does not support Hibernate 5 introduced since Spring IO PF Athens.\r\n\r\nhttp://jadira.sourceforge.net/changes-report.html", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "bthayashidi", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1488442496000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "ericbottard", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1457973584000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "The `cf delete` command line operation does not care whether or not there are bound services on an app.\r\n\r\nThe programmatic API gives me the following though:\r\n```\r\n\r\norg.cloudfoundry.client.v2.CloudFoundryException: CF-AssociationNotEmpty(10006): Please delete the service_bindings associations for your apps.\r\n\tat org.cloudfoundry.spring.client.v2.CloudFoundryExceptionBuilder.build(CloudFoundryExceptionBuilder.java:47) ~[cloudfoundry-client-spring-2.0.0.BUILD-20160310.143940-594.jar:2.0.0.BUILD-SNAPSHOT]\r\n\tat org.cloudfoundry.spring.util.AbstractSpringOperations.lambda$null$1(AbstractSpringOperations.java:72) ~[cloudfoundry-client-spring-2.0.0.BUILD-20160310.143940-594.jar:2.0.0.BUILD-SNAPSHOT]\r\n\tat org.cloudfoundry.spring.util.AbstractSpringOperations$$Lambda$20/1158721381.accept(Unknown Source) ~[na:na]\r\n\tat reactor.core.publisher.FluxYieldingEmitter$YieldingSignalEmitter.request(FluxYieldingEmitter.java:72) ~[reactor-core-2.5.0.BUILD-20160309.103427-478.jar:na]\r\n\tat reactor.core.util.DeferredSubscription.request(DeferredSubscription.java:92) ~[reactor-core-2.5.0.BUILD-20160309.103427-478.jar:na]\r\n\tat reactor.core.publisher.FluxPublishOn$PublishOnPipeline.run(FluxPublishOn.java:164) ~[reactor-core-2.5.0.BUILD-20160309.103427-478.jar:na]\r\n\tat reactor.core.publisher.SchedulerGroup$TaskSubscriber.onNext(SchedulerGroup.java:1081) [reactor-core-2.5.0.BUILD-20160309.103427-478.jar:na]\r\n\tat reactor.core.publisher.SchedulerGroup$TaskSubscriber.onNext(SchedulerGroup.java:1063) [reactor-core-2.5.0.BUILD-20160309.103427-478.jar:na]\r\n\tat reactor.core.publisher.WorkQueueProcessor$QueueSubscriberLoop.run(WorkQueueProcessor.java:842) [reactor-core-2.5.0.BUILD-20160309.103427-478.jar:na]\r\n\tat java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) [na:1.8.0_51]\r\n\tat java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) [na:1.8.0_51]\r\n\tat java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) [na:1.8.0_51]\r\nCaused by: org.springframework.web.client.HttpClientErrorException: 400 Bad Request\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.client.DefaultResponseErrorHandler.handleError(DefaultResponseErrorHandler.java:91) ~[spring-web-4.2.5.RELEASE.jar:4.2.5.RELEASE]\r\n\tat org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.http.OAuth2ErrorHandler.handleError(OAuth2ErrorHandler.java:165) ~[spring-security-oauth2-2.0.9.RELEASE.jar:na]\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate.handleResponse(RestTemplate.java:641) ~[spring-web-4.2.5.RELEASE.jar:4.2.5.RELEASE]\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate.doExecute(RestTemplate.java:597) ~[spring-web-4.2.5.RELEASE.jar:4.2.5.RELEASE]\r\n\tat org.springframework.security.oauth2.client.OAuth2RestTemplate.doExecute(OAuth2RestTemplate.java:128) ~[spring-security-oauth2-2.0.9.RELEASE.jar:na]\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate.execute(RestTemplate.java:572) ~[spring-web-4.2.5.RELEASE.jar:4.2.5.RELEASE]\r\n\tat org.springframework.web.client.RestTemplate.exchange(RestTemplate.java:534) ~[spring-web-4.2.5.RELEASE.jar:4.2.5.RELEASE]\r\n\tat org.cloudfoundry.spring.util.AbstractSpringOperations.lambda$delete$0(AbstractSpringOperations.java:59) ~[cloudfoundry-client-spring-2.0.0.BUILD-20160310.143940-594.jar:2.0.0.BUILD-SNAPSHOT]\r\n\tat org.cloudfoundry.spring.util.AbstractSpringOperations$$Lambda$66/733700885.apply(Unknown Source) ~[na:na]\r\n\tat org.cloudfoundry.spring.util.AbstractSpringOperations.lambda$null$1(AbstractSpringOperations.java:66) ~[cloudfoundry-client-spring-2.0.0.BUILD-20160310.143940-594.jar:2.0.0.BUILD-SNAPSHOT]\r\n\t... 10 common frames omitted\r\n\r\n2016-03-14 17:35:35.376 INFO 9906 --- [ Thread-9] s.c.a.AnnotationConfigApplicationContext : Closing org.springframework.context.annotation.AnnotationConfigApplicationContext@4b0b0854: startup date [Mon Mar 14 17:35:24 CET 2016]; root of context hierarchy\r\n\r\nProcess finished with exit code 130\r\n\r\n```", "title": "Applications.delete() should not care about bound services", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "twoseat", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1458314508000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 240, "repo": "CodeceptJS", "user_login": "Codeception" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "APshenkin", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1475487574000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Update docs and also fix `restart:false` option for WebdriverIO helper (before_suite was called two times (before run all suites(files) and before run the file. It causes two calls of start webdriver and break codeceptjs). Now Browser restarts only when new suite(file) started", "title": "Update docs for beforeSuite/afterSuite and fix restart false", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "APshenkin", "comment_id": 251112503, "datetime": 1475503081000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_1 Hi, please review and merge because now `restart:false` is broken", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "DavertMik", "comment_id": 252193753, "datetime": 1475832422000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Hi, thanks. Merging", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "chanskw", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1457558248000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I tried to parse a very complex structure with the adaptiveParser.\r\n\r\nI got the following error when trying to compile the code:\r\n CDISP9164E ERROR: More than 50 attributes on the same level of tuple is not supported\r\nCDISP0232E ERROR: An error was encountered during the generation of the code for the EHRStream operator.\r\n\r\nIs there any reason why we have an upper limit of 50 attributes? Do you have any recommendation on how to get around this?\r\n\r\nThanks!", "title": "Error about > 50 attributes", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "leongor", "comment_id": 194545194, "datetime": 1457562981000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Yes, the reason behind is that boost spirit qi library based on boost fusion library and it has such a limitation.\r\nThe workaround is very simple: when you have so many attributes on the same level of a tuple, they are usually can be grouped by different subjects. So, just divide the flat tuple to 2 or more tuples. If lists, sets or maps naturally fit they can be used too of course.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "markheger", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1588852801000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "cooperaj", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1453468520000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I'm currently setting up a reasonably complex build that requires bower and gulp. I'm using the new gulp plugin and a third party bower plugin.\r\n\r\nMy question is, in order to neaten up the phpci.yml file it would be nice if these could be as part of a \"build\" stage rather then \"setup\" since they are actually building things. I could see this would also be useful for running Phing scripts that move assets around or auto-generate web service endpoints for example.", "title": "Introduction of a 'build' stage?", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "olimorris", "comment_id": 190063667, "datetime": 1456727489000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Well why can't you use the shell commands plugin that is part of PHPCI?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "cooperaj", "comment_id": 190272724, "datetime": 1456762422000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "It's more of a semantics thing. These are build actions - not testing or setup and so having them separate in your configuration makes sense.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 11655, "repo": "commcare-hq", "user_login": "dimagi" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "snopoke", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1463566435000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_1 \r\n:fish:", "title": "rebulid call center datasources", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "NoahCarnahan", "comment_id": 220020421, "datetime": 1463576906000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": ":+1:", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "bojidar-bg", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1439881404000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Command: ` $ wat css animation `\r\nPath: `/node_modules/wat/bin/index.js:5`\r\nError:\r\n````js\r\nconst uh = require(\"./../\");\r\n^^^^^\r\nSyntaxError: Use of const in strict mode.\r\n at exports.runInThisContext (vm.js:73:16)\r\n at Module._compile (module.js:443:25)\r\n at Object.Module._extensions..js (module.js:478:10)\r\n at Module.load (module.js:355:32)\r\n at Function.Module._load (module.js:310:12)\r\n at Function.Module.runMain (module.js:501:10)\r\n at startup (node.js:129:16)\r\n at node.js:814:3\r\n````\r\nNode version: `v0.12.6`", "title": "SyntaxError: Use of const in strict mode.", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "bojidar-bg", "comment_id": 132098726, "datetime": 1439882295000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Tried to run it with `--harmony`, but the result was....\r\n````\r\n self.log(chalk.yellow(`\\n Sorry, there's no cheat sheet for that comm\r\n ^\r\nSyntaxError: Unexpected token ILLEGAL\r\n````\r\n\r\nSeems like template strings aren't supported in `0.12.6`..", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "bojidar-bg", "comment_id": 132099073, "datetime": 1439882408000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I'll install `0.12.7` and check if there is any difference...", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dthree", "comment_id": 132256571, "datetime": 1439913043000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Thanks for your note and details.\r\n\r\nI'm writing this in ES2015, much of which is compatible with IOJS. The production version will be made compatible with Babel, I just haven't done this yet as it isn't intended for production yet.\r\n\r\nHowever, I would love feedback and suggestions in the meantime, so if you want to play with it, install io.js. This is easiest if you install NVM. It's really useful.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "dthree", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1439913043000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "bojidar-bg", "comment_id": 132973035, "datetime": 1440068146000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "BTW, you can simply setup a gruntfile (--save-dev) to do it automatically...", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dthree", "comment_id": 133058733, "datetime": 1440086058000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Haha, I will be. Just need to actually do it. Haven't used Babel before, so there's that invisible barrier that really isn't a barrier that you have to get through -haha.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "jamillosantos", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1468986742000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "#### Objective\r\nCreate a HTTP server configuration for easy adaptation on different environments.\r\n\r\n#### Description\r\nThe configuration suppose to be at start of the process.\r\n* __Server port__: Port that the server will listen;\r\n* __Bind address__: The binding address;\r\n* __Number of threads__: Threads of the server;\r\n* __Request timeout__: Time that the server will wait by the request header;\r\n* __Content timeout__: Time that the server will wait for the content of the request;", "title": "Create HTTP Server configuration", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "jamillosantos", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1469030526000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "jbpros", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1332081533000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "This is how the World constructor is now expected to call back:\n\n``` javascript\nthis.World = function World(callback) {\n callback(this);\n}\n```\n\nCalling back without a parameter is currently forbidden, leading to an exception:\n\n``` javascript\nthis.World = function World(callback) {\n callback(); // error!\n}\n```\n\nCucumber is using the `new` keyword when calling the `World()` function. It means it could (and should) use the fresh World instance when no explicit one is passed to the callback.\n\n``` javascript\nthis.World = function World(callback) {\n callback(); // would be the same as: callback(this)\n}\n```", "title": "Allow World constructor to callback without explicit world instance", "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "i3games", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1454588688000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "To reproduce:\r\n1. Select part of the output in the terminal (e.g with the mouse)\r\n2. Scroll the terminal in the terminal window.\r\n\r\nCurrent behavior: selection gets lost. This makes it impossible to copy/paste content that is larger than the current terminal-plus window. \r\nDesired behavior: selection stays (that's also the behavior of Atom editor).\r\n\r\nAtom 1.5.0-beta3, terminal-plus 0.14.5", "title": "Keep selection when scrolling", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mzbik", "comment_id": 181149628, "datetime": 1454893006000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "This behaviour is consistent with all the other terminal derivatives that use term.js.\r\n\r\nterm.js (forked by Jeremy and lots of others) uses window.getSelection for selection ranges. I'm not sure (without a LOT of work) that this can be fixed.\r\n\r\nOf course, someone is welcome to prove me wrong.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "robotframework-ride", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1433221010000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "All the different editors should support multiple levels of undo,\r\nmost importantly the grid editor.", "title": "Undo", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "robotframework-ride", "comment_id": 107806671, "datetime": 1433221010000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "A simple undo for grid has been implemented in <a href=\"https://code.google.com/p/username_0/source/detail?r=111\">r111</a>.\r\n\r\nThis version supports undo in one grid, for delete, cut and undo operations.\r\nIf the grid is changed, the undo history is lost.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "robotframework-ride", "comment_id": 107806688, "datetime": 1433221012000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Separate issues have been created for list view and settings undo.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "robotframework-ride", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1433221014000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 12, "repo": "php-sdk", "user_login": "transloadit" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "ABerkhout", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1423818110000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Fix for deprecated @filename API in curl by using the supported CURLFile class.", "title": "Fix for issue #8: CURL depricated functions (PHP 5.5)", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "kvz", "comment_id": 74224398, "datetime": 1423818481000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Thanks for the fix!\r\n\r\nI think we still need an `is_defined` check on `CURLOPT_SAFE_UPLOAD` though, and adding the new targetted php versions to the travis.yml build matrix might also be a cool addition to this PR!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "ABerkhout", "comment_id": 74230004, "datetime": 1423821408000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "It was a bit of a struggle, but it is now passing for PHP 5.3, 5.4, 5.5 and 5.6.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "kvz", "comment_id": 74230442, "datetime": 1423821646000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_0 Greatly appreciated, thank you so much for your contributions! :sparkles: :sparkles: :sparkling_heart: :sparkles:", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "jekbradbury", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1483740850000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I'm trying to compile from source on an AWS instance with Ubuntu 15.04, CUDA 7.5, CUDNN 4.0, and Anaconda Python 3.5 using `python setup.py build_deps` (which doesn't give any errors) and `python setup.py develop` which errors out with a series of `error: too many arguments` like this one:\r\n\r\n```\r\n CHECK(cudnnSetFilterNdDescriptor(desc, dataType, CUDNN_TENSOR_NCHW, dim, size));\r\n ^\r\ntorch/csrc/cudnn/Descriptors.h:46:82: error: too many arguments to function ‘cudnnStatus_t cudnnSetFilterNdDescriptor(cudnnFilterDescriptor_t, cudnnDataType_t, int, const int*)’\r\nIn file included from torch/csrc/cudnn/cuDNN.cpp:1:0:\r\n/usr/local/cuda/include/cudnn.h:337:27: note: declared here\r\n cudnnStatus_t CUDNNWINAPI cudnnSetFilterNdDescriptor(\r\n ^\r\nerror: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1```", "title": "compilation failure with CUDA 7.5, CUDNN 4.0", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "zou3519", "comment_id": 337054498, "datetime": 1508190692000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/pull/3132/ should provide a clean error message now for this case.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "soumith", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1509484764000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 9, "repo": "hal", "user_login": "jramapuram" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "dducry", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1466160723000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": "Merge pull request #1 from jramapuram/feature/lstm", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jramapuram", "comment_id": 226740201, "datetime": 1466160793000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_0 : I think you meant to update username_0:feature/lstm with my new version?", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 1948, "repo": "engine", "user_login": "flutter" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "Hixie", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1446669473000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "- change how we expose settings at the RenderObject layer so that it's\r\n easier to maintain.\r\n- expose the Widget owner chain in the RenderObject layer debug output\r\n- add debug info to RenderOpacity, RenderIgnorePointer, RenderListener\r\n- make the output for text nodes prettier", "title": "Get more debug info into the rendering layer", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "abarth", "comment_id": 153856080, "datetime": 1446669658000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "LGTM", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "peter-mouland", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1474099002000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I've been using this plugin on the server to help render universal apps. The app requires in some code that imports scss, which on the server, is duly ignored. This works find when i was running the server and the first step was to call `babel-core/register`.\r\n\r\nNot that I am trying to remove babel from my prod code i find that the hook is no longer working. By removing babel from my prod code I mean instead i use babel-cli to precompile the server. I then get node to run the compiled code.\r\n\r\nI noticed you mentioned cache in your readme, but i don't beleive it is that as the error suggests the hook isn't doing anything : \r\n\r\n```\r\nError: Cannot find module './mainLayout.scss'\r\n```\r\n\r\nIt seems to me babel register and babel-cli compile in different ways, which doesn't sound right?\r\n\r\nhave you any idea?\r\n\r\nTo help, here is a quick place to see that code changes I've made to my app : \r\nhttps://github.com/username_0/react-lego/compare/remove-prod-babel\r\n\r\nthe whole app (with this new branch) is available here: \r\nhttps://github.com/username_0/react-lego/tree/remove-prod-babel", "title": "not working when server code is precompiled", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "bahmutov", "comment_id": 247847708, "datetime": 1474205272000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Hmm, not sure what is going on here, but seems loading and transforming CSS files might require Babel. Node hook only calls the user supplied function when loading the file, and does not know how to transform to / from .css files. You can easily debug the node-hook yourself by adding console statements to it source code, and print what it is trying to load and the file paths.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "peter-mouland", "comment_id": 247861821, "datetime": 1474220570000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "if I remember to take a deeper look, i'll let you know the results. \r\n\r\nIn the meantime however I have a way to get the code to work by compiling the server using webpack (with babel-loader + ExtractTextPlugin for the scss). I think i'd prefer to use babel-cli directly in the long run as this makes less changes to the code.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "peter-mouland", "comment_id": 260301485, "datetime": 1479119643000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "closing this as it's no longer a problem. not sure what i did to solve it!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "peter-mouland", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1479119643000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "dfmuir", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1446766333000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I am using iOS 9 and just see a blank icon in the activity sheet.", "title": "Not showing icon when using CocoaPods", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "anscho", "comment_id": 167133675, "datetime": 1450974939000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Hey @username_0, I opened a pull request related to this: https://github.com/username_2/ARChromeActivity/pull/23\r\n\r\nIt would be great to know if that solution works for you as well.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "alextrob", "comment_id": 171080638, "datetime": 1452637719000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Fixed in version 1.0.6, now available in Cocoapods.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "alextrob", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1452637719000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "clausfuglsang", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1453468306000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "After I stop playing music from spotify, which basically works fine, the Musicbox will crash if I leave it for more than an hour or so, and then wants to continue playing music again.\r\nIf i stop playing, and I get back to it an hour later, I need to reboot it manually if I want to play from spotify again. I only use spotify, so i am not aware of if the problem is the same with the other services.\r\n\r\nI've had this issue for 1½ years now.\r\nI'm running the latest release of Musicbox.\r\nGreat work though, love the features.", "title": "Bug: Crashing when spotify continue", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jcass77", "comment_id": 173957161, "datetime": 1453477558000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Could you perhaps take a look at ```/var/log/mopidy/mopidy.log``` and post any relevant error messages contained therein?\r\n\r\nDoes it work if you do ```service mopidy restart``` instead of a full reboot of the Musicbox?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "kingosticks", "comment_id": 173965658, "datetime": 1453479396000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "And, just to clarify, when you say 'stop' do you mean pause?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "lukyluke112", "comment_id": 177874198, "datetime": 1454319098000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "Have the same issue", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "lukyluke112", "comment_id": 177874451, "datetime": 1454319173000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "And with me it just won't play anything", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "kingosticks", "comment_id": 177878225, "datetime": 1454319813000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "If you don't your logs there is literally nothing to go on.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "lukyluke112", "comment_id": 177881802, "datetime": 1454320333000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "Bit of a noob looked for log file do you use a different name for the log file", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "B3nihana", "comment_id": 211351098, "datetime": 1460981135000, "masked_author": "username_4", "text": "I have the same issue also, as I use MusicBox infrequently but solely for Spotify. I am still able to restart MB via the web UI but its very slow to respond (UI very sluggish to load menus, will play songs like there is no bandwidth).\r\n\r\nI'll be sure to get the log next time this happens, I'm just so used to rebooting it now!\r\n\r\nOriginal Pi B+ btw", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "B3nihana", "comment_id": 218390435, "datetime": 1462954022000, "masked_author": "username_4", "text": "Ok, so this issue happened again and I remember to grab the log.\r\n\r\nBasically I start to play a spotify playlist, then pause it after several hours and try to unpause it the next day and nothing happens. I can navigate the GUI but searching for music or trying to start a new playlist results in a spinning busy icon. Sometimes it will start working 30 minutes later, but usually I simply restart and it works.\r\n\r\nHope this helps:\r\nMonit.log\r\n`[UTC` Apr 17 13:08:21] info : 'mopidy' trying to restart\r\n[UTC Apr 17 13:08:21] info : 'mopidy' stop: /etc/init.d/mopidy\r\n[UTC Apr 17 13:08:51] info : 'mopidy' start: /etc/init.d/mopidy\r\n[UTC Apr 17 13:10:51] info : 'mopidy' connection succeeded to INET[localhost:6680] via TCP\r\n[UTC Apr 17 16:06:38] info : monit daemon with pid [2478] killed\r\n[UTC Apr 17 16:06:38] info : 'system_MusicBox' Monit stopped\r\n[UTC Apr 17 16:07:15] info : Starting monit daemon\r\n[UTC Apr 17 16:07:15] info : Monit start delay set -- pause for 300s\r\n[UTC Apr 17 16:12:15] info : 'system_MusicBox' Monit started\r\n[UTC Apr 18 12:05:40] info : monit daemon with pid [2480] killed\r\n[UTC Apr 18 12:05:40] info : 'system_MusicBox' Monit stopped\r\n[UTC Apr 18 12:06:42] info : Starting monit daemon\r\n[UTC Apr 18 12:06:42] info : Monit start delay set -- pause for 300s\r\n[UTC Apr 18 12:11:42] info : 'system_MusicBox' Monit started\r\n[UTC Apr 24 08:07:17] info : monit daemon with pid [2488] killed\r\n[UTC Apr 24 08:07:17] info : 'system_MusicBox' Monit stopped\r\n[UTC Apr 24 08:07:55] info : Starting monit daemon\r\n[UTC Apr 24 08:07:55] info : Monit start delay set -- pause for 300s\r\n[UTC Apr 24 08:12:55] info : 'system_MusicBox' Monit started\r\n[UTC Apr 25 11:45:46] error : 'upmpdcli' process is not running\r\n[UTC Apr 25 11:45:46] info : 'upmpdcli' trying to restart\r\n[UTC Apr 25 11:45:46] info : 'upmpdcli' start: /etc/init.d/upmpdcli\r\n[UTC Apr 25 11:47:46] info : 'upmpdcli' process is running with pid 3066\r\n[UTC Apr 29 17:48:54] error : 'upmpdcli' process is not running\r\n[UTC Apr 29 17:48:54] info : 'upmpdcli' trying to restart\r\n[UTC Apr 29 17:48:54] info : 'upmpdcli' start: /etc/init.d/upmpdcli\r\n[UTC Apr 29 17:50:54] info : 'upmpdcli' process is running with pid 5317\r\n[UTC May 4 05:17:30] info : Starting monit daemon\r\n[UTC May 4 05:17:30] info : Monit start delay set -- pause for 300s\r\n[UTC May 4 05:22:30] info : 'system_MusicBox' Monit started\r\n[UTC May 10 07:36:18] error : 'mopidy' process is not running\r\n[UTC May 10 07:36:18] info : 'mopidy' trying to restart\r\n[UTC May 10 07:36:18] info : 'mopidy' start: /etc/init.d/mopidy\r\n[UTC May 10 07:38:18] info : 'mopidy' process is running with pid 3691\r\n[UTC May 11 06:27:07] error : 'mopidy' failed protocol test [HTTP] at INET[localhost:6680] via TCP -- HTTP: Error receiving data -- Resource temporarily unavailable\r\n[UTC May 11 06:29:12] error : 'mopidy' failed protocol test [HTTP] at INET[localhost:6680] via TCP -- HTTP: Error receiving data -- Resource temporarily unavailable\r\n[UTC May 11 06:29:12] info : 'mopidy' trying to restart\r\n[UTC May 11 06:29:12] info : 'mopidy' stop: /etc/init.d/mopidy\r\n[UTC May 11 06:29:42] info : 'mopidy' start: /etc/init.d/mopidy\r\n[UTC May 11 06:31:43] info : 'mopidy' connection succeeded to INET[localhost:6680] via TCP`\r\n\r\nMopidy.log\r\n\r\n`2016-05-11 06:29:46,473 - INFO Starting Mopidy 0.19.5\r\n2016-05-11 06:29:48,592 - INFO Loading config from: builtin defaults, /etc/mopidy/extensions.d/spotify.conf, /etc/mopidy/mopidy.conf, command line options\r\n2016-05-11 06:29:50,262 - INFO Enabled extensions: mopify, spotify, mpd, http, stream, spotify_tunigo, mobile, podcast-gpodder, local-sqlite, youtube, podcast-itunes, http-kuechenradio, scrobbler, simple-webclient, softwaremixer, local-whoosh, dirble, moped, websettings, podcast, tunein\r\n2016-05-11 06:29:50,265 - INFO Disabled extensions: alsamixer, gmusic, somafm, subsonic, internetarchive, audioaddict, musicbox_webclient, local, soundcloud\r\n2016-05-11 06:29:50,268 - WARNING Found alsamixer configuration errors, the extension has been automatically disabled:\r\n2016-05-11 06:29:50,271 - WARNING alsamixer/control must be set.\r\n2016-05-11 06:29:50,274 - WARNING alsamixer/card must be set.\r\n2016-05-11 06:29:50,276 - WARNING Found musicbox_webclient configuration errors, the extension has been automatically disabled:\r\n2016-05-11 06:29:50,279 - WARNING musicbox_webclient/musicbox unknown config key.\r\n2016-05-11 06:29:50,282 - WARNING Please fix the extension configuration errors or disable the extensions to silence these messages.\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:07,956 - INFO Starting Mopidy mixer: SoftwareMixer\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:07,963 - INFO Mixing using GStreamer software mixing\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:07,976 - INFO Mixer volume set to 85\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:07,980 - INFO Starting Mopidy audio\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:07,997 - INFO Starting Mopidy backends: SpotifyTunigoBackend, TuneInBackend, StreamBackend, PodcastBackend, YoutubeBackend, SpotifyBackend, DirbleBackend\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:08,150 - INFO Audio output set to \"alsasink\"\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:08,299 - INFO Starting Mopidy-Podcast directories: iTunesDirectory, FeedsDirectory, GPodderDirectory\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:08,333 - INFO Refreshing Mopidy-Podcast directories\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:08,412 - INFO Starting new HTTP connection (1): itunes.apple.com\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:08,516 - INFO Mopidy uses SPOTIFY(R) CORE\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:08,647 - INFO Starting Mopidy core\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:09,136 - INFO Starting Mopidy frontends: MpdFrontend, HttpFrontend, ScrobblerFrontend\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:09,152 - INFO MPD server running at [::ffff:0.0.0.0]:6600\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:09,181 - INFO HTTP server running at [::ffff:0.0.0.0]:6680\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:09,933 - INFO Scrobbler connected to Last.fm\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:10,439 - INFO Connected to Spotify\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:11,271 - INFO New MPD connection from [::ffff:127.0.0.1]:60441\r\n2016-05-11 06:30:28,905 - INFO Loaded 31 Spotify playlists\r\n2016-05-11 06:31:43,277 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 108.47ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:33:43,333 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.96ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:35:43,388 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.72ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:37:43,446 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.86ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:39:43,501 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.69ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:41:43,563 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 21.08ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:43:43,613 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.67ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:45:43,668 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.43ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:47:43,725 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.21ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:49:43,782 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 15.23ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:51:43,837 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.40ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:53:43,893 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.77ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:55:43,952 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 17.65ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:57:44,053 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 29.91ms\r\n2016-05-11 06:59:44,106 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.33ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:01:44,162 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.77ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:03:44,218 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.48ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:05:44,274 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 15.16ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:07:44,386 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 31.09ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:09:44,430 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.61ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:11:44,486 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.69ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:13:44,542 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 15.27ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:13:55,134 - INFO Loaded 31 Spotify playlists\r\n2016-05-11 07:15:44,601 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 16.78ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:17:44,657 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.35ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:19:44,714 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 15.15ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:21:44,772 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.99ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:23:44,829 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.35ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:25:44,887 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.37ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:27:44,944 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 15.18ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:29:40,221 - INFO 304 GET /images/icons/pause_32x32.png (192.168.1.34) 58.29ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:29:40,376 - INFO 200 GET /images/icons/play_alt_12x12.png (192.168.1.34) 50.37ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:29:45,023 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 17.77ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:31:45,088 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 17.16ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:33:45,156 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 18.78ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:35:45,272 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 32.83ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:37:45,382 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 21.83ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:39:00,775 - INFO 304 GET /images/icons/play_alt_32x32.png (192.168.1.34) 105.35ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:39:00,876 - INFO 304 GET /images/default_cover.png (192.168.1.34) 69.91ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:39:01,209 - INFO 304 GET /images/icons/pause_32x32.png (192.168.1.34) 128.83ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:39:45,561 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 71.53ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:41:45,617 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 17.70ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:42:12,766 - INFO 304 GET /images/icons/play_alt_32x32.png (192.168.1.34) 36.17ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:42:12,920 - INFO 304 GET /images/default_cover.png (192.168.1.34) 80.46ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:42:13,229 - INFO 304 GET /images/icons/pause_32x32.png (192.168.1.34) 41.58ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:43:45,683 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 18.80ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:45:18,321 - INFO 304 GET /images/default_cover.png (192.168.1.34) 82.82ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:45:18,398 - INFO 304 GET /images/icons/play_alt_32x32.png (192.168.1.34) 57.46ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:45:18,566 - INFO 304 GET /images/icons/pause_32x32.png (192.168.1.34) 38.26ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:45:45,750 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 18.57ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:47:37,347 - INFO 304 GET /images/icons/play_alt_32x32.png (192.168.1.34) 14.70ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:47:45,809 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 15.83ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:49:45,866 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 14.20ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:51:46,018 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 46.41ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:52:10,622 - INFO 304 GET /images/default_cover.png (192.168.1.34) 43.26ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:53:46,073 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 18.34ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:55:46,135 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 15.07ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:57:23,657 - INFO 304 GET /images/icons/play_alt_32x32.png (192.168.1.34) 43.15ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:57:23,766 - INFO 304 GET /images/default_cover.png (192.168.1.34) 69.07ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:57:46,201 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 17.33ms\r\n2016-05-11 07:59:46,346 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 55.81ms\r\n2016-05-11 08:01:46,429 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 22.53ms\r\n2016-05-11 08:03:46,552 - INFO 200 GET / (127.0.0.1) 38.37ms`", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "kingosticks", "comment_id": 218761711, "datetime": 1463060765000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Thanks for providing your log unfortunately the LOG_LEVEL is too high to show anything interesting. The problem with increasing the verbosity is that over time it's a great way to wear out your SD card so it's not advisable in the long-term. However, if you have a way to reliably recreate this problem then you could try temporarily setting `level = DEBUG` in `/etc/mopidy/mopidy.log`.\r\n\r\nWhen Mopidy crashes, depending on your browser, you may still be able to navigate the web UI since it's cached by your browser; but anything action that requires new response data will fail and you'll get the spinning icon. \r\n\r\nCan you just clarify when you paused and unpaused, particularly in relation to the events in monit.log.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 112, "repo": "auto-sklearn", "user_login": "automl" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "iver56", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1470315710000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Without this, pip would fail to choose version during installation. I guess xgboost doesn't use semantic versioning atm.", "title": "Freeze xgboost requirement", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mfeurer", "comment_id": 238209751, "datetime": 1470655753000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "I cannot reproduce this in a fresh virtual environment using the [auto-sklearn installation guide](http://automl.github.io/auto-sklearn/stable/). Can you please explain how you installed auto-sklearn?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "iver56", "comment_id": 238211252, "datetime": 1470656272000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I used a fresh instance of Ubuntu 14.04 run on Azure. I used the installation guide that you referenced. I did not use virtualenv. Not sure if I had an old version of pip. That might have been the problem. Anyway, this little change fixed the pip install problem in my case.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mfeurer", "comment_id": 238211902, "datetime": 1470656492000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Okay. It also seems to be a good idea to fix the version number since we ship xgboost metadata. Before I can merge this we have to resolve the version number. On my machine pip installs version 0.4a30 instead of 0.4a27. Do you have any idea why you get an older version of xgboost?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "iver56", "comment_id": 238235906, "datetime": 1470662976000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I can now confirm that an old version of pip was my problem. It was version 1.5.4, which was released in 2014 and bundled with Ubuntu 14.04. With this version of pip, it would complain about xgboost, showing, the following message:\r\n```\r\nCould not find a version that satisfies the requirement xgboost (from versions: 0.4a15, 0.4a22, 0.4a28, 0.4a26, 0.4a25, 0.4a30, 0.4a12, 0.4a14, 0.4a23, 0.4a19, 0.4a29, 0.4a21, 0.4a13, 0.4a18, 0.4a24, 0.4a20, 0.4a27)\r\n```\r\nIt didn't list 0.4a30 but it doesn't complain when I try to run `pip install xgboost==0.4a30`. New versions of pip do list 0.4a30, though. I changed my commit so version 0.4a30 is installed instead of 0.4a27.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mfeurer", "comment_id": 238256182, "datetime": 1470666755000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Thank you very much.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "dls314", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1471381052000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "When the generated nuspec's file list includes a src attribute containing directories beginning with a dot, the NuProj target could warn that NoDefaultExcludes may be needed.\r\n\r\nAlternately, NoDefaultExcludes could be defaulted to True\r\n\r\nThe error shown here is \"Cannot create a package that has no dependencies nor content.\" which doesn't explain how to fix things.", "title": "NuProj targets could warn when NoDefaultExcludes may be needed", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "kovalikp", "comment_id": 243902369, "datetime": 1472677701000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Changed the default value to true in b0914238.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "kovalikp", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1472677701000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 1692, "repo": "php-src", "user_login": "php" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "dshafik", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1450885584000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "As per [the RFC](https://wiki.php.net/rfc/curl_http2_push)", "title": "Add HTTP/2 Server Push to ext/curl", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jpauli", "comment_id": 166935246, "datetime": 1450887610000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Hi.\r\n\r\nCould we add some tests in this PR please ?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dshafik", "comment_id": 166939909, "datetime": 1450888780000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_1 I can double check/add tests for the refactoring a, but the curl push stuff requires an HTTP/2 capable server with push support; do you have any thoughts on how to test it? \r\n\r\nCurrently I have a docker container I spin up with both a node.js and nghttpd test servers on it, but that obviously isn't something we'd want to port over into the php test suite.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jpauli", "comment_id": 166942424, "datetime": 1450889436000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "I have no idea, but I'm sceptic at merging a PR that adds some code like this one, with no test at all.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dshafik", "comment_id": 166948777, "datetime": 1450891357000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_1 I agree, but it will need discussion to figure out the best way to handle it. We should probably figure out a way for all HTTP/2 related functionality – in the future that might be the http stream and other extensions.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jpauli", "comment_id": 166962624, "datetime": 1450894774000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Does the RFC point that ? If not, perhaps it is the moment to open the discussion ?\r\nTests also have the advantage to reveal eventual memory leaks or bad memory accesses (using valgrind mainly)", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "rlerdorf", "comment_id": 166972540, "datetime": 1450897655000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "We could think about adding HTTP/2 to the built-in server to have a native test target.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dshafik", "comment_id": 166977941, "datetime": 1450899780000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_2 that's not a bad idea but also a big undertaking - I'm not sure we could even do push as it is blocking AFAIK", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "php-pulls", "comment_id": 166997465, "datetime": 1450907253000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "I don't see that as being a limitation. You can obviously write a single-threaded event-driven HTTP/2 implementation. In fact that is the best way to implement it. But yes, it is non-trivial. Unless we can find a nice library that does all the heavy lifting that we can just link against.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dshafik", "comment_id": 166997916, "datetime": 1450907486000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "We could probably use nghttp2 for all the heavy lifting, it's a pretty fantastic library - but it's another dependency for core, of course. Perhaps make it conditional so that it will serve HTTP/1 regardless?", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "rrauenza", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1393547546000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I get constraint errors during fixture teardown. At the moment I'm injecting a db flush to get around it, which seems to work ok.\r\n\r\n<pre>\r\n @classmethod\r\n def _fixture_teardown(cls):\r\n fixtures = getattr(cls, 'fixtures', None)\r\n _fb_should_teardown_fixtures = getattr(cls, '_fb_should_teardown_fixtures', True)\r\n # _fixture_teardown needs help with constraints.\r\n if fixtures and _fb_should_teardown_fixtures:\r\n call_command('flush', interactive=False, verbosity=1)\r\n return super(MyFastFixtureTestCase, cls)._fixture_teardown()\r\n</pre>", "title": "Fixture tearDown doesn't handle constraints well", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jwhitlock", "comment_id": 118183262, "datetime": 1435875517000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "There are a number of bugs around fixtures. Can you provide a test case or a public project that reproduces the error?", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "mmaitre314", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1457219324000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "When my Web API hits an exception and is about to return an HTTP 500, I'd like the response content to include the Session ID and Operation ID so users can report more actionable bugs. I read that AppInsights was setting that info in the OWIN environment, but I can't find it. Would you recommendations about how to retrieve those IDs?", "title": "Getting the Operation Id from within a Web API call", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "abaranch", "comment_id": 194010502, "datetime": 1457478458000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "For IIS hosted WebAPI projects RequestTelemetry that has all context information is accessible through HttpContext extension method: System.Web.HttpContextExtension.GetRequestTelemetry (starting from 2.0.0-beta3). Session would available if you also use JS SDK.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mmaitre314", "comment_id": 194427612, "datetime": 1457546693000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Thanks for the info!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "mmaitre314", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1457546694000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 29, "repo": "menu", "user_login": "spatie" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "christophrumpel", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1483385838000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Update year of the license", "title": "Update LICENSE.md", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "freekmurze", "comment_id": 270012284, "datetime": 1483385865000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Thanks again!", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 5, "repo": "gdspy", "user_login": "heitzmann" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "johnlb", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1462659742000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I guess the windows compiler doesn't know about cmath defines by default...", "title": "fixed clipper.hpp for windows compile", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "johnlb", "comment_id": 217702304, "datetime": 1462694329000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "1. Added ability to \"translate\" existing objects. This makes building more complex geometries a bit easier (ie. a function might build a basic set of geometries at the origin, which can then be translated to the desired location within the larger scope)\r\n\r\n2. Added a \"copy\" function to duplicate & translate any translatable object\r\n\r\n3. Added several tests for these functions in \"tutorial.py\"\r\n\r\nNOTE: There seems to be a bug in the viewer for Labels only. When a label is copied, the original doesn't seem to show up in the viewer. It does, however, show up correctly in the GDS output & the data structure seems to be correct.\r\n\r\nI haven't gotten a chance to dig into the viewer yet; do you have any thoughts on what this might be?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "heitzmann", "comment_id": 217843636, "datetime": 1462794549000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "A few comments:\r\n- Why make all translations in polar coordinates (direction, distance) instead of rectangular (dx, dy)? The second form seems more straightforward and would make more sense in a doble loop (`for dx in ...`, `for dy in ...`), in my opinion.\r\n- This operation:\r\n`self.points += distance * numpy.array([dx, dy]*n).reshape(n,2)`\r\ncan be simply written as\r\n`self.points += numpy.array([distance * dx, distance * dy])`\r\nwhich runs faster.\r\n- I'm not sure why we have:\r\n```\r\nif direction == None:\r\n direction = self.direction\r\nelse:\r\n self.direction = direction\r\n```\r\nOnly paths have significant directions, bu not other polygons/polygon sets.\r\n- Please fix `IMPROT_TRANS` to `IMPORT_TRANS` in tutorial.py", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "johnlb", "comment_id": 217944236, "datetime": 1462817700000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "- re: polar coords\r\nProbably one part \"stick with the established style,\" one part generality (can do polar or x-y, though x-y requires two operations instead of one). You're right, though. In practice, you'll use x-y more, so it should be easier to use.\r\nFixed.\r\n\r\n- re: += \r\nDidn't know numpy automagically did singleton expansion. Guess I should have suspected.\r\nFixed.\r\n\r\n- re: self.direction\r\nApologies. Copy-paste error (trying to keep coding style same).\r\nFixed.\r\n\r\n- re: IMPROT\r\nFixed.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "heitzmann", "comment_id": 218449375, "datetime": 1462971022000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Many thanks, @username_0!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "amccaugh", "comment_id": 233167632, "datetime": 1468736929000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_1 Any chance you could push the latest version to PyPi ( https://pypi.python.org/pypi/gdspy ) so gdspy can be installed using pip? Currently when installed from pip, the gdspy example code tutorial.py fails because the translate() is not defined (but is used in the example code). Also just wanted to say great work on the library!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "heitzmann", "comment_id": 233197265, "datetime": 1468781277000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_2 Done!", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 3, "repo": "tangrams-indic", "user_login": "srikanthlogic" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "tallytalwar", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1475591618000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "- This project was using 0.6 version of tangram, updated to use 0.10 released version of tangram\r\n- Refer to all the improvements in the releases post 0.6 here: https://github.com/tangrams/tangram/releases\r\n- Nothing seems to break for me with this update, kindly check it before merging.\r\n\r\nThanks", "title": "Update to use tangram 0.10 latest release", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "srikanthlogic", "comment_id": 251594633, "datetime": 1475649688000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Thanks. will check and merge.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 169, "repo": "server_core", "user_login": "NYPL-Simplified" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "leonardr", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1460384548000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "At one point our rules for when a work was 'presentation-ready' (i.e. would be shown to patrons for checkout) were pretty strict. In particular, you either had to have a cover image or Edition.no_known_cover had to be set. no_known_cover meant that we had tried really hard to look for a cover image and come up short.\r\n\r\nBut recently we changed the rules so that works are made presentation-ready much sooner. If there's a problem completing the metadata for a book, we want a) the book to be loanable during the period when the problem happens, and b) the problem to be visible (e.g. by bad metadata), not invisible (e.g. by a book not showing up in the collection). So we effectively stopped using no_known_cover.\r\n\r\nI'm about to do some work that changes the relationship between Edition and Work, and as cleanup I'm getting rid of no_known_cover, which complicates that relationship and is no longer used.", "title": "Remove Edition.no_known_cover", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "courte", "comment_id": 208380479, "datetime": 1460385828000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": ":+1: This is excitiiing!", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "vmurashev", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1474727669000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Rationale:\r\n'past.builtins' is not a part of stock python modules, as result it's difficult to run boost-python tests in limited environments (like Android) at the same time it is the one line only to fix it -\r\nCode like\r\nif (sys.version_info.major >= 3):\r\n from past.builtins import long\r\n\r\nCan be easily replaced with:\r\nif (sys.version_info.major >= 3):\r\n long = int", "title": "tests for python3 - what about to remove useless dependence on 'past.builtins' ?", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "vmurashev", "comment_id": 249368617, "datetime": 1474728728000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "patch suggested - see pull request 88", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "stefanseefeld", "comment_id": 250363466, "datetime": 1475120732000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Much simpler indeed. Merged, thanks !", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "stefanseefeld", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1475120732000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "fidrox", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1481173717000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Installed the packages listed in the README and a few more to satisfy a few issue during the build but have gotten to a point that I'm not sure how to get past. \r\n\r\nERROR:\r\n~~~~ CMake Error: The following variables are used in this project, but they are set to NOTFOUND.\r\nPlease set them or make sure they are set and tested correctly in the CMake files:\r\nX11_Xft_LIB (ADVANCED)\r\n linked by target \"polybar\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/src\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.utils_string\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.utils_memory\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.utils_math\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.x11_color\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.components_command_line\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.components_di\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.utils_color\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n\r\n-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!\r\nSee also \"/home/dex/polybar/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log\".\r\nSee also \"/home/dex/polybar/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log\".\r\n** Failed to generate build... read output to get a hint of what went wrong\r\n~~~~\r\n\r\nFULL OUTPUT:\r\n~~~~ \r\n** Fetching submodules\r\n** Removing existing build dir (-f)\r\n** Setting build options\r\n** Enable i3 module ------- [Y/n]: y\r\n** Enable volume module --- [Y/n]: y\r\n** Enable network module -- [Y/n]: y\r\n** Enable mpd module ------ [Y/n]: n\r\n** Using compiler: g++/gcc\r\n** Executing cmake command\r\n-- The C compiler identification is GNU 5.4.0\r\n-- The CXX compiler identification is GNU 5.4.0\r\n-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/gcc\r\n-- Check for working C compiler: /usr/bin/gcc -- works\r\n-- Detecting C compiler ABI info\r\n-- Detecting C compiler ABI info - done\r\n-- Detecting C compile features\r\n-- Detecting C compile features - done\r\n-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/g++\r\n-- Check for working CXX compiler: /usr/bin/g++ -- works\r\n-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info\r\n-- Detecting CXX compiler ABI info - done\r\n-- Detecting CXX compile features\r\n-- Detecting CXX compile features - done\r\n-- No build type specified; using Release\r\n-- Using supported compiler GNU\r\n-- No preferred c++lib specified... linking against system default\r\n-- Found PkgConfig: /usr/bin/pkg-config (found version \"0.29.1\") \r\n-- --------------------------\r\n-- Build type: Release\r\n-- Compiler C: /usr/bin/gcc\r\n-- Compiler C++: /usr/bin/g++\r\n-- Compiler flags: -Wall -Wextra -Werror -O3 -pedantic -pedantic-errors -ffunction-sections -fdata-sections\r\n-- release: -O3 -DNDEBUG\r\n-- Linker flags: -Wl,--gc-sections\r\n-- C++ library: system default\r\n-- --------------------------\r\n-- Build testsuite OFF\r\n-- Debug logging OFF\r\n-- Verbose tracing OFF\r\n-- Draw debug hints OFF\r\n-- Enable ccache OFF\r\n-- --------------------------\r\n-- Enable alsa ON\r\n-- Enable i3 ON\r\n-- Enable mpd OFF\r\n-- Enable network ON\r\n-- --------------------------\r\n-- XRANDR support ON\r\n-- XRENDER support OFF\r\n-- XDAMAGE support OFF\r\n-- XSYNC support OFF\r\n-- XCOMPOSITE support OFF\r\n-- XKB support ON\r\n-- --------------------------\r\n-- Boost version: 1.58.0\r\n-- Looking for pthread.h\r\n-- Looking for pthread.h - found\r\n-- Looking for pthread_create\r\n-- Looking for pthread_create - not found\r\n-- Check if compiler accepts -pthread\r\n-- Check if compiler accepts -pthread - yes\r\n-- Found Threads: TRUE \r\n-- Looking for XOpenDisplay in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so\r\n-- Looking for XOpenDisplay in /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so - found\r\n-- Looking for gethostbyname\r\n-- Looking for gethostbyname - found\r\n-- Looking for connect\r\n-- Looking for connect - found\r\n-- Looking for remove\r\n-- Looking for remove - found\r\n-- Looking for shmat\r\n-- Looking for shmat - found\r\n-- Found X11: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so\r\n-- Found X11_XCB: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11-xcb.so \r\n-- Checking for module 'fontconfig'\r\n-- Found fontconfig, version 2.11.94\r\n-- Checking for module 'xcb-proto'\r\n-- Found xcb-proto, version 1.11\r\n-- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python2.7 (found suitable version \"2.7.11\", minimum required is \"2.7\") \r\n-- XCB[XCB]: Found component XCB\r\n-- Found XCB_XCB: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so \r\n-- XCB[ICCCM]: Found component ICCCM\r\n-- Found XCB_ICCCM: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-icccm.so \r\n-- XCB[EWMH]: Found component EWMH\r\n-- Found XCB_EWMH: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-ewmh.so \r\n-- XCB[UTIL]: Found component UTIL\r\n-- Found XCB_UTIL: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-util.so \r\n-- XCB[IMAGE]: Found component IMAGE\r\n-- Found XCB_IMAGE: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-image.so \r\n-- Found XCB: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-icccm.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-ewmh.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-util.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-image.so \r\n-- Searching for xcbgen with python2\r\n-- Found xcbgen in /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages\r\n-- XCB[RANDR]: Found component RANDR\r\n-- Found XCB_RANDR: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-randr.so \r\n-- Found XCB: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-icccm.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-ewmh.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-util.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-image.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-randr.so \r\n-- XCB[XKB]: Found component XKB\r\n-- Found XCB_XKB: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-xkb.so \r\n-- Found XCB: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-icccm.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-ewmh.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-util.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-image.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-randr.so;/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb-xkb.so \r\n-- xpp: including xcb proto xkb.xml\r\n-- xpp: including xcb proto randr.xml\r\n-- xpp: including xcb proto xproto.xml\r\n-- Found ALSA: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libasound.so (found version \"1.1.0\") \r\n-- Found Libiw: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libiw.so \r\n-- Checking for module 'jsoncpp>=1.7.7'\r\n-- \r\n-- Could not find jsoncpp>=1.7.7 -- building static lib...\r\n-- JsonCpp Version: 1.7.7\r\n-- Found PythonInterp: /usr/bin/python2.7 (found suitable version \"2.7.11\", minimum required is \"2.6\") \r\nCMake Error: The following variables are used in this project, but they are set to NOTFOUND.\r\nPlease set them or make sure they are set and tested correctly in the CMake files:\r\nX11_Xft_LIB (ADVANCED)\r\n linked by target \"polybar\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/src\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.utils_string\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.utils_memory\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.utils_math\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.x11_color\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.components_command_line\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.components_di\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n linked by target \"unit_test.utils_color\" in directory /home/dex/polybar/tests\r\n\r\n-- Configuring incomplete, errors occurred!\r\nSee also \"/home/dex/polybar/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeOutput.log\".\r\nSee also \"/home/dex/polybar/build/CMakeFiles/CMakeError.log\".\r\n** Failed to generate build... read output to get a hint of what went wrong\r\n~~~~", "title": "Unable to build on LinuxMint 18 (ubu 16.04)", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "davewongillies", "comment_id": 265661474, "datetime": 1481177454000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "I'm currently building in a fresh docker container each time running Ubuntu 16.04 and this is [my list of build depends](https://github.com/username_1/fpm-recipes/blob/master/polybar/recipe.rb#L13) which works for me:\r\n\r\n```\r\ncmake\r\ncmake-data\r\nlibboost-dev\r\nlibfreetype6-dev\r\nlibxcb1-dev\r\nlibx11-xcb-dev\r\nlibxcb-util0-dev\r\nlibxcb-image0-dev\r\nlibxcb-randr0-dev\r\nlibxcb-ewmh-dev\r\nlibxcb-xkb-dev\r\nlibxcb-icccm4-dev\r\nxcb-proto\r\npython-xcbgen\r\ni3-wm\r\nlibiw-dev\r\nlibasound2-dev\r\nlibmpdclient-dev\r\npkg-config\r\nlibfontconfig1-dev\r\nlibghc-x11-xft-dev'\r\n```", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jaagr", "comment_id": 265765600, "datetime": 1481210376000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_0 looks like you're missing the freetype package", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "fidrox", "comment_id": 265784724, "datetime": 1481214564000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Thanks guys, got it working!\r\n\r\nFreetype was installed but I was missing something. Ran the list @username_1 provided through apt-get and it garbed a few files (not sure which ones) then the build process ran with no issue. \r\n\r\nThanks for the great app.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jaagr", "comment_id": 265785153, "datetime": 1481214650000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Awesome, I will update the readme with the list @username_1 provided", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "jaagr", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1481214654000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "liuchungui", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1470474161000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "不是前端的，看了半天代码也不会改哈，所以来求助", "title": "请问这里面代码高亮的颜色配置如何替换？", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "tufu9441", "comment_id": 238084869, "datetime": 1470579341000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "style.scss里找相关代码。", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "liuchungui", "comment_id": 238255567, "datetime": 1470666627000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "谢谢啊", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "tufu9441", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1470926824000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "amirmc", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1419173295000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "display issues again, but here is an example of the \"no scrollbars\"\r\nproblem in Chrome (well, Chromium, really). It's all the more annoying\r\nsince the arrows are hijacked by the page. With FF + Vimperator, it is\r\npossible to scroll with 'J/K' and see the rest of the text.\r\n\r\n", "title": "Content goes off the page (and prevents scrollbars?)", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mor1", "comment_id": 68496320, "datetime": 1420142272000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "re font-- just had a look at this, and it looks like there's some url routing weirdness that's causing the `@url()` entries that are supposed to point to the embedded fonts to fail. i'll put this on the todo list to fix. (might be a few days as have a lot to catch up on after the holiday and moving jobs :)\r\n\r\nre performance-- absolutely, yes. could you create an issue requesting this please?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Emm", "comment_id": 68519015, "datetime": 1420195640000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_1 done", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mor1", "comment_id": 73093193, "datetime": 1423158881000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_2 finally had a look at this. our (that is, my) use of `@font-face` was completely and utterly broken. i suspect it was working for me due to happy accident (my mac has `PT Sans` and `PT Sans Narrow` fonts that matched).\r\n\r\ni think i've now fixed this -- at least, i see the webfont being fetched from the server as i expect now. i'll merge the patch once travis completes the build, and then will have to make the rebuilt site live. will pingback here when done. sorry about the delay...", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Emm", "comment_id": 73115033, "datetime": 1423166203000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "No worries.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mor1", "comment_id": 266353848, "datetime": 1481524624000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_2 Argh sorry, forgot to pingback! I think this is now fixed, so closing. Please reopen if you see the problem again!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "mor1", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1481524624000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 179, "repo": "nakadi", "user_login": "zalando" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "rcillo", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1458226851000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "In order to more precisely communicate partial success scenarios, we are\r\nintroducing 207 Multi-status code as a possible http response code.\r\n\r\nIn case all events have been published successfully, then we just return\r\n200 with empty body, otherwise we provide detailed status information in\r\nthe form of an array of BatchItemResponse's.\r\n\r\nWe considered using 422 as a response answer but it just doesn't feel correct\r\nsince we could have a mix of successes and failures in the batch.", "title": "aruha-113 add multi-status code 207", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "review-ninja", "comment_id": 197921577, "datetime": 1458226852000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "<a href=\"https://app.review.ninja/zalando/nakadi/pull/179\" target=\"_blank\"><img src=\"https://app.review.ninja/44234368/pull/179/badge\" alt=\"ReviewNinja\"/>", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "v-stepanov", "comment_id": 197925181, "datetime": 1458227333000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "I still think that 422 is a an appropriate answer when not a single event was published. So that we can have\r\n- 200 when everything successful\r\n- 207 when some are published and some are failed\r\n- 422 when no event is published successfully\r\n\r\n@username_0 @username_3 what do you guys think?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jkliff", "comment_id": 197929217, "datetime": 1458228027000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "@username_2 I don't think so, but maybe I am not seeing why you think so. Do you mind explaining the reasoning behind it?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "rcillo", "comment_id": 197930208, "datetime": 1458228173000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_2 I think it makes sense if all of the failures are due to client error. The same way, if all of the events fail due to kafka being down, I think i could be 503, for example.\r\n\r\nThis is an important discussion. I think that the answer to @username_2 question will have as consequences the removal of other statuses, like 503, for example.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "v-stepanov", "comment_id": 197952299, "datetime": 1458231113000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_3 @username_0 \r\nWell, for me everything that starts with 2xx is considered to be a \"successful\", and if everything failed - there's not much success in that. However in the documentation of 207 it says that you can even use in in failure situations. (https://httpstatuses.com/207)\r\n`The response MAY be used in success, partial success and also in failure situations.`\r\nSo in general you are right\r\n.\r\nBut I also think that consulting with API guild can also be useful in this case.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "rcillo", "comment_id": 197963970, "datetime": 1458232579000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_2 I just realised that it can be useful to reserve 422 for complete failure. For example, let's suppose there's an error on the desserialization of the RequestBody. This error is not \"localized\" to a single event and should result in a complete failure with 422.\r\n\r\nSo if we state that 422 should come together with a list of BatchItemResponse's then we have no way to express errors that are not specific to a single event.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "tfrauenstein", "comment_id": 198353211, "datetime": 1458307431000, "masked_author": "username_4", "text": "If think it depends on the failure type. I would 1st check all client side failures, like producing of event that does not match its type scheme. If there is any client failure event in the batch I would react \"atomic\" with client error status code (e.g. 422) plus return problem object array providing the details and no state change. If it is during server side state change processing phase, I would return either 200 for complete success or 207 for partial state change and success complemented with return problem object array providing the details.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jkliff", "comment_id": 198366425, "datetime": 1458308621000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "Except for failures directly related to the underlying broker (i.e. after validating, etc), all issues are treated atomically (no state change). \r\nAny case of success and failure will always produce item-by-item responses. \r\nI agree with @username_2 and @username_4. In being a 4xx, 422 indicates that the opreation was not successful as a whole and this is a simple indication to the client that it wasn't correct. \r\n200 works as a simple indicator that the whole was successful and 207 serves any situation where some items only were not successful (server side failure in @username_4 terms).\r\n\r\nThis fits directly with @username_2's proposal. \r\n\r\nI support.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dehora", "comment_id": 198406850, "datetime": 1458314424000, "masked_author": "username_5", "text": "Just so I understand, what would the return codes be in these cases posting a batch containing two events, A and B - \r\n\r\n- A passes the EventValidationStrategy, and B fails\r\n\r\n- Both A and B fail the EventValidationStrategy\r\n\r\n- A can be sent onwards to its partition, and B can't\r\n\r\n- Both A and B can't be sent to their partitions", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "rcillo", "comment_id": 199243567, "datetime": 1458562000000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Response status 207 and response body `[ BatchItemResponse A { step: PUBLISHING, publishing_status: FAILED, detail: \"the specifics of the publishing error\" }, BatchItemResponse B { step: PUBLISHING, publishing_status: FAILED, detail: \"the specifics of the publishing error\" } ]`", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dehora", "comment_id": 199291378, "datetime": 1458568362000, "masked_author": "username_5", "text": "@username_0 :+1: thanks", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "rcillo", "comment_id": 199732385, "datetime": 1458641344000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Thanks to @username_4 and @username_5 for the feedback. I'll merge this PR.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "benjaminbillet", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1439115839000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Hi,\r\nThe Blueprint API allows developers to write their own Predicate implementations. For example:\r\n```java\r\nGraphQuery query = graph.query();\r\nquery.has(someKey, new Predicate() {\r\n\t@Override\r\n\tpublic boolean evaluate(Object first, Object second) {\r\n\t\t...\r\n\t}\r\n}, someValue);\r\n```\r\nHowever, this code throws an exception.\r\n```\r\nException in thread \"main\" com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.OCommandSQLParsingException: Error on parsing command at position #0: Encountered \"\" at line 1, column 21.\r\nWas expecting one of:\r\n \r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.OCommandExecutorSQLAbstract.throwParsingException(OCommandExecutorSQLAbstract.java:101)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.OCommandExecutorSQLAbstract.preParse(OCommandExecutorSQLAbstract.java:237)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.OCommandExecutorSQLSelect.parse(OCommandExecutorSQLSelect.java:209)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.OCommandExecutorSQLSelect.parse(OCommandExecutorSQLSelect.java:89)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.OCommandExecutorSQLDelegate.parse(OCommandExecutorSQLDelegate.java:76)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.OCommandExecutorSQLDelegate.parse(OCommandExecutorSQLDelegate.java:42)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.core.storage.impl.local.OAbstractPaginatedStorage.command(OAbstractPaginatedStorage.java:1211)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.query.OSQLQuery.run(OSQLQuery.java:72)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.core.sql.query.OSQLSynchQuery.run(OSQLSynchQuery.java:85)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.core.query.OQueryAbstract.execute(OQueryAbstract.java:33)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.server.network.protocol.binary.ONetworkProtocolBinary.command(ONetworkProtocolBinary.java:1312)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.server.network.protocol.binary.ONetworkProtocolBinary.executeRequest(ONetworkProtocolBinary.java:393)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.orient.server.network.protocol.binary.OBinaryNetworkProtocolAbstract.execute(OBinaryNetworkProtocolAbstract.java:222)\r\n\tat com.orientechnologies.common.thread.OSoftThread.run(OSoftThread.java:71)\r\n```\r\nI read the code of OrientGraphQuery and, apparently, this class simply builds an OrientDB SQL request by mapping the predefined predicates provided by the BlueprintAPI (`com.tinkerpop.blueprints.Compare and com.tinkerpop.blueprints.Compare` and `com.tinkerpop.blueprints.Contains`) to the OrientDB SQL keywords. This implementation implies that custom Predicate are de facto not supported by this class, while allowed by the Blueprint API.", "title": "Custom predicate in GraphQuery/VertexQuery", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "lvca", "comment_id": 129235120, "datetime": 1439152078000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Fixed, thanks.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "lvca", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1439152078000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "benjaminbillet", "comment_id": 129428269, "datetime": 1439210272000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Wow, that was quick. Thanks.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "lvca", "comment_id": 129437736, "datetime": 1439212215000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Unfortunately using custom predicate OrientDB can't optimize in SQL, so you could experiment slow down.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "dbaeumer", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1461134115000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "_From @username_3 on April 20, 2016 4:46_\n\n- VSCode Version: 1.0.0\r\n- OS Version: Windows 10 Pro\r\n\r\nI have no extensions installed. node.js v5.10.1\r\n\r\nError highlighting has stopped working in our node.js app - I was able to reduce it to a very minimal test case:\r\n\r\nA single index.js containing an erroneous line so you can see if error highlighting is on\r\nA single subfolder containing a package.json with grunt and grunt-browserify packages and a node_modules folder created by running npm install against the package.json\r\nStandard vscode files - .vscode/launch.json and jsconfig.json\r\n\r\nSteps to Reproduce:\r\n\r\n1. [Clone this repo](https://github.com/username_3/vscode-error-min/) or [recreate structure above from this gist](https://gist.github.com/username_3/da6bde225b114d9b8d9f7cf66772c0c9)\r\n2. Navigate to ./sub and run `npm install`\r\n3. Open main folder in VSCode\r\n4. View ./index.js - there is no error highlighting\r\n\r\nI have reproduced this on 3 machines\r\n\r\nAlmost any change to this minimum case, like removing the node_modules folder, removing `use strict` from the index.js etc., removing the vscode files etc. prevents the bug from being triggered, and error highlighting starts working again, however our app is not a minimal test case so knowing that isn't much help to us!\n\n_Copied from original issue: Microsoft/vscode#5530_", "title": "JS error highlighting stops working in some cases", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dbaeumer", "comment_id": 212280477, "datetime": 1461134119000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "_From @username_3 on April 20, 2016 5:16_\n\nBTW, there are a ton of ways to fix the min case so that it works, like adding node_modules to the exclude in jsconfig.json - but none of these fixes helps in our full app. Am at quite the loss as to how to proceed. Please let me know if I can provide any more info.\r\n\r\nIntellisense is also down.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dbaeumer", "comment_id": 212280483, "datetime": 1461134120000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_3 thanks a lot for this nice test case. I was able to reproduce this immediately. First analysis shows that the tsserver which is powering JavaScript language smartness throws on reading the project info. We need to do two things here:\r\n\r\n- let the user know that reading the project info failed.\r\n- make a issue for the TS team.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dbaeumer", "comment_id": 212282796, "datetime": 1461134527000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "\r\n\r\nAbove the request / response trace I get in VSCode", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "billti", "comment_id": 212533439, "datetime": 1461174639000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_2 can you take a look and see why tsserver is having issues with this repro?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "zhengbli", "comment_id": 212617762, "datetime": 1461188292000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "This looks like the old issue where when the files in `node_modules` are included in the project, it takes a very long time to process the project. Because the project is not ready, asking for project info will result in an error message. https://github.com/Microsoft/TypeScript/pull/7486 is likely to fix the issue once it goes in. By default, the `node_modules` in the project root level will be excluded, however in his case the folder is inside a child folder `sub`, therefore its content is included. In fact, if waiting long enough, the error marks will show up eventually, it's just really slow right now.\r\n\r\nWork around: edit the `jsconfig.json` so it looks like:\r\n```\r\n{\r\n \"compilerOptions\": {\r\n \"target\": \"es6\",\r\n \"module\": \"commonjs\"\r\n },\r\n \"exclude\": [\r\n \"sub/node_modules\"\r\n ]\r\n}\r\n```", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "zhengbli", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1461188402000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "reopened", "author": "zhengbli", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1461188612000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "_From @username_3 on April 20, 2016 4:46_\n\n- VSCode Version: 1.0.0\r\n- OS Version: Windows 10 Pro\r\n\r\nI have no extensions installed. node.js v5.10.1\r\n\r\nError highlighting has stopped working in our node.js app - I was able to reduce it to a very minimal test case:\r\n\r\nA single index.js containing an erroneous line so you can see if error highlighting is on\r\nA single subfolder containing a package.json with grunt and grunt-browserify packages and a node_modules folder created by running npm install against the package.json\r\nStandard vscode files - .vscode/launch.json and jsconfig.json\r\n\r\nSteps to Reproduce:\r\n\r\n1. [Clone this repo](https://github.com/username_3/vscode-error-min/) or [recreate structure above from this gist](https://gist.github.com/username_3/da6bde225b114d9b8d9f7cf66772c0c9)\r\n2. Navigate to ./sub and run `npm install`\r\n3. Open main folder in VSCode\r\n4. View ./index.js - there is no error highlighting\r\n\r\nI have reproduced this on 3 machines\r\n\r\nAlmost any change to this minimum case, like removing the node_modules folder, removing `use strict` from the index.js etc., removing the vscode files etc. prevents the bug from being triggered, and error highlighting starts working again, however our app is not a minimal test case so knowing that isn't much help to us!\n\n_Copied from original issue: Microsoft/vscode#5530_", "title": "JS error highlighting stops working in some cases", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "nrkn", "comment_id": 212633955, "datetime": 1461190576000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "Brilliant. Though I'd already tried using `exclude` in our main app (not the minimal test) with no luck, I'd only been excluding a couple of things (including sub-folders' node_modules) and it is quite a large project. \r\n\r\nBy knowing that this was the cause I was able to get error highlighting and intellisense back by aggressively adding more and more things to the exclude until they started working. \r\n\r\nLooking forward to being able to remove some of those things when this fix surfaces!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "zhengbli", "comment_id": 212636702, "datetime": 1461190917000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_3 out of curiosity, what are the common folders that you need to exclude manually? Are these your source code files or libraries?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "nrkn", "comment_id": 212640026, "datetime": 1461191857000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "Our own source - now that I look over it to better answer your question, most of it can actually probably stay in `exclude` - it's mostly stuff like tests, browserified client js etc.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "zhengbli", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1466037076000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 256, "repo": "multiple-select", "user_login": "wenzhixin" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "vlados", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1448529292000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": "Added open and close functions to be called public", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "wenzhixin", "comment_id": 159866374, "datetime": 1448532429000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "When need to use these two methods?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "wenzhixin", "comment_id": 160025573, "datetime": 1448590552000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Thanks!", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "josephjacks", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1480361899000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": "Write docs on how default KET docker registry works with existing user registry", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "dkoshkin", "comment_id": 263643147, "datetime": 1480441440000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "There is this [document](https://github.com/apprenda/kismatic/blob/master/docs/DOCKER_REGISTRY.md).\r\n\r\nDid you have anything else in mind?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "alexbrand", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1481033297000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "alexbrand", "comment_id": 265158033, "datetime": 1481033297000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Closing as this is currently documented. Please re-open if docs need clarification/improvement.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "josephjacks", "comment_id": 265161222, "datetime": 1481034115000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "We don't link to it anywhere in the main docs sections. I'll fix that.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "paazmaya", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1425020676000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Package manager for C++, https://www.biicode.com/\r\n\r\nWill be adding whatever is needed for it via PR", "title": "biicode", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "mgreter", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1425090507000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mgreter", "comment_id": 76505506, "datetime": 1425090507000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Merged!", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "dimitrilongo", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1416339489000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "hi\r\nthis is my code to select all text with a standard textarea . I'll try to do the same with uiKit textarea\r\n\r\n <textarea id=\"myTextarea\">Lorem lipsum</textarea>\r\n <button type=\"button\" onclick=\"myFunction()\">Select All</button>\r\n\r\n <script>\r\n function myFunction() {\r\n document.getElementById(\"myTextarea\").select();\r\n }\r\n </script>\r\n\r\nbut with uiKit\r\n `<textarea id=\"myTextarea\" data-uk-htmleditor>Lorem lipsum</textarea>`\r\ndoesn't work anymore\r\nIf someone have a workaround.\r\nThanks", "title": "\"Select all content\" button with Uikit <textarea data-uk-htmleditor>", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "saschadube", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1424339444000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 15, "repo": "GraphX", "user_login": "panthernet" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "perturbare", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1432156021000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "This pull request contains a set of changes I made for my own project that uses GraphX. With these changes, the serialization is further decoupled from the LogicCore and GraphArea to make it easier to use other storage types. In my case, I needed to use streams.\r\n\r\nPlease note: I apologize, but my development environment is Windows 7, so I cannot update the METRO assemblies at this time. If you like these changes, I think you'll find the conversion to be pretty trivial, but I have not messed with those because I cannot test them yet.\r\n\r\nIn GraphArea, I've changed SerializeToFile and DeserializeFromFile into methods that return or accept the collections of graph data. This makes the GraphArea serialization support more widely usable and allows developers to make use of other storage types without having to extend GraphArea.\r\n\r\nThe FileServiceProvider property is removed from LogicCore. This removes the file specific dependencies from LogicCore and supports the goal of using other storage types without having to add more provider types to LogicCore.\r\n\r\nThe IFileServiceProvider interface has been removed. It certainly does not have to be deleted, but it's not necessary to have a common interface for serialization.\r\n\r\nFileServiceProviderWpf has been altered in a few ways. The IFileServiceProvider interface goes away. It is converted to a static class because no instance information is needed in it and the calling sites don't need to create an instance. Stream serialization is added for the sake of providing an example (this is the key piece I needed in my project).\r\n\r\nGeneralGraph is changed to show how the FileServiceProviderWpf class is used with the changes to GraphArea.\r\n\r\nI am open to suggestions, so please let me know your thoughts. This would be a breaking change for some users of GraphX, but I hope you'll find the value of decoupling from file specific I/O is worth the change. Again, I apologize for not being able to provide the METRO updates with this request.\r\n\r\nThanks.\r\n\r\nJon", "title": "Serialization decoupling", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "panthernet", "comment_id": 104182490, "datetime": 1432197631000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Thanks, i think you're right. All the GraphX need to do in this case is to supply serialization data and leave the serialization details to custom code.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "birbilis", "comment_id": 108285116, "datetime": 1433326023000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Using static classes instead of interfaces can mean though that you need to use reflection to call them (e.g. if you wan to have a list of export plugins). \r\n\r\nInstead can keep interfaces and make use of MEF to locate import/export and other plugins (you can have some class attribute there that mark the class as a GraphXExporter and MEF can be asked then to give you interface instances from classes that have that attribute.)\r\n\r\nsee usage at\r\nhttp://clipflair.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#Client/ClipFlair.Windows/ClipFlair.Windows.Map/MapWindowFactory.cs\r\nand\r\nhttp://clipflair.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#Client/ClipFlair.Windows/ClipFlair.Windows.Image/ImageWindowFactory.cs\r\n\r\n----------\r\n\r\n//Project: ClipFlair (http://ClipFlair.codeplex.com)\r\n//Filename: MapWindowFactory.cs\r\n//Version: 20140318\r\n\r\nusing System.ComponentModel.Composition;\r\n\r\nnamespace ClipFlair.Windows.Map\r\n{\r\n\r\n //Supported views\r\n [Export(\"ClipFlair.Windows.Views.MapView\", typeof(IWindowFactory))]\r\n //MEF creation policy\r\n [PartCreationPolicy(CreationPolicy.Shared)]\r\n public class MapWindowFactory : IWindowFactory\r\n {\r\n public BaseWindow CreateWindow()\r\n {\r\n return new MapWindow();\r\n }\r\n }\r\n\r\n}\r\n\r\n----------\r\n\r\n//Project: ClipFlair (http://ClipFlair.codeplex.com)\r\n//Filename: ImageWindowFactory.cs\r\n//Version: 20140616\r\n\r\nusing System.ComponentModel.Composition;\r\nusing System.IO;\r\n\r\nnamespace ClipFlair.Windows.Image\r\n{\r\n\r\n //Supported file extensions\r\n [Export(\".PNG\", typeof(IFileWindowFactory))]\r\n [Export(\".JPG\", typeof(IFileWindowFactory))]\r\n //Supported views\r\n [Export(\"ClipFlair.Windows.Views.ImageView\", typeof(IWindowFactory))]\r\n //MEF creation Policy\r\n [PartCreationPolicy(CreationPolicy.Shared)]\r\n public class ImageWindowFactory : IFileWindowFactory\r\n {\r\n\r\n public const string LOAD_FILTER = \"Image files (*.png, *.jpg)|*.png;*.jpg\";\r\n\r\n public static string[] SUPPORTED_FILE_EXTENSIONS = new string[] { \".PNG\", \".JPG\" };\r\n\r\n public string[] SupportedFileExtensions()\r\n {\r\n return SUPPORTED_FILE_EXTENSIONS;\r\n }\r\n\r\n public BaseWindow CreateWindow()\r\n {\r\n return new ImageWindow();\r\n }\r\n\r\n }\r\n\r\n}\r\n\r\nthen at \r\nhttp://clipflair.codeplex.com/SourceControl/latest#Client/ClipFlair.Windows/ClipFlair.Windows.Base/Source/View/BaseWindow.xaml.cs\r\n\r\nto get the first plugin that supports some contract (I get that contract name from the serialization file [using DataContracts]) for a loaded view, or that supports some file extension for a file dropped inside a component, I do:\r\n\r\n protected static IWindowFactory GetWindowFactory(string contract)\r\n {\r\n Lazy<IWindowFactory> win = mefContainer.GetExports<IWindowFactory>(contract).FirstOrDefault();\r\n if (win == null)\r\n throw new Exception(BaseWindowStrings.msgUnknownViewType + contract);\r\n else\r\n return win.Value;\r\n }\r\n\r\n protected static IFileWindowFactory GetFileWindowFactory(string contract)\r\n {\r\n Lazy<IFileWindowFactory> win = mefContainer.GetExports<IFileWindowFactory>(contract).FirstOrDefault();\r\n if (win != null)\r\n return win.Value;\r\n else\r\n return null;\r\n }", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "perturbare", "comment_id": 108534925, "datetime": 1433352383000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "The class I converted to static is in the sample application. It does not have to be static, but it was a reasonable conversion for the sample. In a case such as yours, you are free to define an interface and build many serializers that implement it. That added flexibility is a benefit of this set of changes.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "clund", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1461188551000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "The following is a crawler, but not listed as one.\r\n\r\nMozilla/5.0 (Linux; Android 6.0.1; Nexus 5X Build/MMB29P) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/41.0.2272.96 Mobile Safari/537.36 (compatible; Googlebot/2.1; +http://www.google.com/bot.html)\r\n\r\nUA seen from 66.249.65.101", "title": "Is bot : Googlebot Mobile", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "asgrim", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1462443037000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 236, "repo": "DKImagePickerController", "user_login": "zhangao0086" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "hyouuu", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1477767780000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "The resetCachedAssets > stopCachingForAllAssets needs access and would crash the app.\n\nAlso removed some ! usage in DKAsset.swift, which were either unsafe or unnecessary", "title": "Fix crash when denied access", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "zhangao0086", "comment_id": 257203877, "datetime": 1477882448000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Thanks for your PR!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "hyouuu", "comment_id": 257217079, "datetime": 1477892031000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "My pleasure - thanks for sharing!", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "aarongan", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1457017501000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Thanks, but there is bug if $filter('currency') is returning negative-sign , it is not supported in ngModel.$setViewValue function.\r\n\r\nngModel.$setViewValue(\"-$50\") results below\r\n=> ngModel.$viewValue = \"\"\r\n=> ngModel.$modelValue = \"\"\r\n\r\nBut it works when using parenthesis \"()\" instead of negative-sign \"-\".\r\n\r\nPlease refer to previous issue. Which this is inconsistent accross both ngModel and $filter services. \r\nhttps://github.com/angular/angular.js/issues/14163", "title": "ngModel.$setViewValue not accepting \"-$xxx\" instead of parenthesis \"($xxx)\" ", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Narretz", "comment_id": 191804514, "datetime": 1457017597000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Can you please provide a fully runnable example, in a plnkr.co or similar?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "Narretz", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1457520778000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Narretz", "comment_id": 194239696, "datetime": 1457520778000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "There's not enough information here to act. Please reopen when you can provide a demo.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "kardinal3000", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1472557740000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Hello guys, I had install TFS 15 RC1 and faced with next issue the slicing of test cases coming from single assembly was working (VSO) and were distributed uniformly on two different VMs. But when using on premises build agent ,the slicing is not working. I have already updated build agent to **2.105.2.** I get this warning when run tests task starts.\r\n\r\nExecuting the powershell script: D:\\VSTSAgents\\_work\\_tasksRunVisualStudioTestsusingTestAgent_d353d6a2-e361-4a8f-8d8c-123bebb71028\\1.0.40\\RunDistributedTests.ps1\r\n**Update the build agent to run tests with uniform distribution. If you are using hosted agent there are chances that it is still not updated, so retry using your own agent.**\r\n\r\nI have try use to more older version of build agent 103.1, 104.1, 104.2, 105, 105.1 didn't help \r\n\r\nI have managed to produce it on version of Build Agent 103 I mean run distribution tests in parallel mode. But this situation is not regular \r\n\r\nOn further investigation it appears class InvokeRundistributedTestsCmdLet of **Microsoft.TeamFoundation.DistributedTask.Task.LegacySDK.dll** doesn't have custom slicing enabled as a parameter. Why it was working with hosting agent. Does it mean the Microsoft.TeamFoundationDistributedTask.Task.LegacySDK.dll is different in case of hosted agent ?", "title": "The task RunVisualStudioTestsusingTestAgent", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "acesiddhu", "comment_id": 243821244, "datetime": 1472660973000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "This one is a duplicate of https://github.com/Microsoft/vsts-tasks/issues/2370.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "acesiddhu", "comment_id": 245188545, "datetime": 1473230155000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Closing this instance. we will track #2370.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "acesiddhu", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1473230158000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "BenjaminPiscart", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1463745532000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Hi I'm having this type of error, seems $download[0] is undefined\r\n\r\n` // Download\r\n if (typeof $download[0].download === 'undefined') {\r\n $download.addClass('disabled');\r\n }`", "title": "main.js TypeError: Cannot read property 'download' of undefined", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "fengyuanchen", "comment_id": 222365076, "datetime": 1464533977000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Browser and version?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "fengyuanchen", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1472877592000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "apasho", "comment_id": 257862180, "datetime": 1478092942000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "I'm getting this same error. I'm using Firefox 49.02.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "madshargreave", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1455988700000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Hi\r\n\r\nI am hosting an application that uses websockets, and goes through CloudFlare.\r\n\r\nSince CF does not support websockets, I have to route these seperately to a CNAME ws -> mydomain.com, and disable the CF for that specific record.\r\n\r\nI get the following error:\r\n\r\n```\r\nWebSocket connection to 'wss://ws.mydomain.com/socket/websocket?vsn=1.0.0' failed: Error in connection establishment: net::ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED\r\n```\r\n\r\nI'm guessing that's because the SSL is not properly setup on the subdomain\r\n\r\nHow can I fix this?", "title": "Securing subdomain", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "lafama", "comment_id": 186659990, "datetime": 1455991431000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "I think this could be caused by cloudflare, are you on the free plan? if yes u need to note that free plan provides Universal SSL.. Universal SSL support is defined by the OS/Browser support for two newer features:\r\n- Server Name Indication (SNI)\r\n- Elliptic Curve certificates (ECDSA)\r\nWhich could be causing what your experiencing", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "madshargreave", "comment_id": 186660051, "datetime": 1455991490000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Yes I'm on the free plan, but I have disabled proxying for ws.domain.com", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "lafama", "comment_id": 186660282, "datetime": 1455991721000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "What about ssl, when you browse your domain, do you get your ssl cert or cloudflare? :-)", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "madshargreave", "comment_id": 186660400, "datetime": 1455991817000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Ill be damned, you're right! I get the CloufFlare cert.\r\n\r\nHow can I make it use the one on dokku?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "lafama", "comment_id": 186660844, "datetime": 1455991954000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "upgrade to paid plan 20$ a month", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "madshargreave", "comment_id": 186662110, "datetime": 1455992454000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Is that really necessary?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "lafama", "comment_id": 186662685, "datetime": 1455992726000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Maybe try this **(i have not tried this)** [disable CF ](https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/200169176-How-do-I-temporarily-deactivate-CloudFlare-)and make sure [SSL on C](https://support.cloudflare.com/hc/en-us/articles/200170416-What-do-the-SSL-options-Off-Flexible-SSL-Full-SSL-Full-SSL-Strict-SSL-Only-mean-)F is also disabled . But this will expose you server IP", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "madshargreave", "comment_id": 186665987, "datetime": 1455994223000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Doing this results in a ERR_TOO_MANY_REDIRECTS\r\n\r\nI am forcing HTTPS on the application level", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "madshargreave", "comment_id": 186666355, "datetime": 1455994556000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I just notice that I get \r\n\r\n`ACME server returned an error: urn:acme:error:malformed :: The request message was malformed :: Error creating new authz :: Issuance for IP addresses not supported`\r\n\r\nWhen I run `dokku letsencrupr myapp`", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "madshargreave", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1455994556000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "reopened", "author": "madshargreave", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1455995065000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Hi\r\n\r\nI am hosting an application that uses websockets, and goes through CloudFlare.\r\n\r\nSince CF does not support websockets, I have to route these seperately to a CNAME ws -> mydomain.com, and disable the CF for that specific record.\r\n\r\nI get the following error:\r\n\r\n```\r\nWebSocket connection to 'wss://ws.mydomain.com/socket/websocket?vsn=1.0.0' failed: Error in connection establishment: net::ERR_CONNECTION_REFUSED\r\n```\r\n\r\nI'm guessing that's because the SSL is not properly setup on the subdomain\r\n\r\nHow can I fix this?", "title": "Securing subdomain", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "sseemayer", "comment_id": 186817621, "datetime": 1456058819000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "*Regarding the failure of requesting a certificate for IP addresses:* `dokku-letsencrypt` will use the result of the `dokku urls <myapp>` to decide what domains to request certificates for. Since let's encrypt will not let you request certificates for IP adresses, it's probably a good idea for us to filter out IP addresses. This is probably a nice easy contribution for a first-time contributor, if anyone is interested.\r\n\r\n*Regarding your original websockets problem:* If you set up cloudflare to not proxy your websockets subdomain for you, it might take up to 48 hours for the DNS caches between your ISP and CloudFlare to all get updated with the new IP address for the subdomain which might be why you're still seeing the CloudFlare-provided certificates on your `ws` subdomain. I haven't tried setting up a web socket setup like this myself but don't see a reason why this should not work with the free tier on CloudFlare, given enough waiting time. As @username_1 says, such a configuration would expose your IP address, though.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "sseemayer", "comment_id": 190068417, "datetime": 1456728677000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_0 any news on this?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "sseemayer", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1457341335000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "sseemayer", "comment_id": 193165693, "datetime": 1457341335000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "Closing for inactivity.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "praveenperera", "comment_id": 206932648, "datetime": 1460039486000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "I wanted to get www.myapp.com to redirect to myapp.com, to do that securely with a letsencrypt certificate I did as above\r\n\r\n1. Adding www.myapp.com with domains:add\r\n2. Ran letsencrypt\r\n3. Removed www.myapp.com domains:remove\r\n\r\nAre there plans to make the process a little simpler?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "sseemayer", "comment_id": 206944490, "datetime": 1460041561000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "This was previously discussed in #21 and dokku/dokku-redirect#1 but since I've never elaborated on why this is difficult to implement for all use cases of the redirect plugin, I'm re-opening the discussion there. I'd be happy to hear your suggestions too! :+1:", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "TheMaaarc", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1460973301000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Is it possible to index the contents of all blocks on a page? As an example, if i search for \"Zephir\", i want sites with the word \"Zephir\" **in** it. Not only sites with the **title** \"Zephir\".", "title": "LUYA internal search", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "nadar", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1470296981000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "nadar", "comment_id": 237478928, "datetime": 1470296981000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Currently this is not realstic, as we would need to build an internal crawler. Also on large sites to many results would appear.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 24, "repo": "akka-monitoring", "user_login": "petabridge" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "AlbertoMonteiro", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1452564331000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": "Improved README with syntax highlight in C# code", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Aaronontheweb", "comment_id": 172990495, "datetime": 1453238460000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "TY sir", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 118, "repo": "dotnetfringe.github.io", "user_login": "dotnetfringe" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "julielerman", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1463239559000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": "my proposal :)", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "adron-orange", "comment_id": 219227407, "datetime": 1463240996000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Thanks @username_0 !", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

{ "number": 418, "repo": "hakyll", "user_login": "jaspervdj" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "lettier", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1461556083000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "-- ...\r\n```\r\n```html\r\n<!-- \"templates/default.html\" -->\r\n<html>\r\n <head>\r\n <meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"$url$\">\r\n <title>$title$</title>\r\n </head>\r\n <body>\r\n $date$\r\n $body\r\n </body>\r\n</html>\r\n```\r\n\r\nThis will allow them to create or match a page with a different identifier than the one they wish to load. In this example they are loading say Identifier `posts/yyyy-mm-dd-my-recent-post.markdown` but they output the Identifier `index.html`. \r\n\r\nYou can see it in use here https://username_0.github.io rendered and the [source code](https://github.com/username_0/username_0.github.io/blob/hakyll/site.hs#L51). \r\n\r\nThanks!", "title": "Adds itemSetIdentifier to Item.hs and changeIdentifier to Compiler.hs.", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jaspervdj", "comment_id": 214240734, "datetime": 1461577987000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Hey, I don't think this is a good idea. The identifier should be immutable as much as possible. you can do something like this:\r\n\r\n```\r\nitem <- loadAndApplyTemplate \"templates/default.html\" postCtx post >>= relativizeUrls\r\nmakeItem (itemBody item)\r\n```", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "lettier", "comment_id": 214290352, "datetime": 1461586638000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Okay, that works too. Thanks @username_1. :+1:", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "sjclemmy", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1460036544000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I have a service that contains a method that returns an object that contains methods:\r\n```\r\n/**\r\n* @memberof module\r\n* @name myService\r\n* @ngdoc service\r\n*/\r\nfunction myService(){\r\n \r\n return {\r\n test: test\r\n} \r\n\r\n/**\r\n* @memberof myService\r\n*/\r\nfunction test(){\r\n\r\n/**\r\n* @memberof myService\r\n* @desc This is an obj\r\n* @type {Object}\r\n*/\r\n var obj = {\r\n prop1: '',\r\n testfunc: function (){\r\n //some stuff \r\n }\r\n }\r\n }\r\n}\r\n```\r\nHow do define a description for `testfunc`?", "title": "How to document methods inside objects", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Zemke", "comment_id": 207477012, "datetime": 1460128987000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "You can’t. Actually there’s already a mistake in documenting `obj` as a member of `myService`–it’s not.\r\n\r\nThere’s a way to do something like that, though.\r\n\r\nYou can document `obj` explicitly using `@ngdoc type`:\r\n\r\n```js\r\n/**\r\n * @ngdoc type\r\n * @name YourObjectName\r\n * @memberof app\r\n *\r\n * @property {string} prop1 You could also document this string property\r\n * @property {function} testfunc Here you can document the function. :)\r\n */\r\n```\r\n\r\nDepending on what you want to do with `obj`, you could use `app.YourObjectName` as the return type (like `@returns {app.YourObjectName} description blah blah`) of a function or even declare `obj` with `@type {app.YourObjectName}` as opposed to `@type {Object}` in your example.\r\n\r\nI hope this helps. :)", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "Zemke", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1461274347000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "reloaded", "comment_id": 213168155, "datetime": 1461284087000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "According to JSDOC3 @memberof this should definitely be possible.\r\n\r\nQuoting their @memberof basic example:\r\n```\r\n/** @namespace */\r\nvar Tools = {};\r\n\r\n/** @memberof Tools */\r\nvar hammer = function() {\r\n};\r\n\r\nTools.hammer = hammer;\r\n```\r\n\r\nAlso you should be able to achieve this with the use of the @alias and @memberof! (notice the exclamation point at the end of memberof).\r\n\r\nhttp://usejsdoc.org/tags-memberof.html", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Zemke", "comment_id": 213831121, "datetime": 1461444722000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Okay, I assumed it was of importance to keep it in the object definition and not use dot notation.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "JohannesHoehne", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1433928191000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": "remove MACOS folder from the zip-file of MARA download", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "IreneWinkler", "comment_id": 110714469, "datetime": 1433936850000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "fixed", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "JohannesHoehne", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1433943693000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

{ "number": 10, "repo": "s3transfer", "user_login": "boto" }

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "kyleknap", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1456356854000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "cc @username_1 @JordonPhillips", "title": "Implement copy method for transfer manager", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jamesls", "comment_id": 220437259, "datetime": 1463688422000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Looks good, only question I had was about the str or dict version of the source param.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "kyleknap", "comment_id": 220482099, "datetime": 1463701574000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Should be good to look at again. After our discussion, I just completely removed the ability to pass a string as a copy source as that is a leaky abstraction that should not be used.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jamesls", "comment_id": 220693866, "datetime": 1463771553000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Looks good, I think it's good that we only allow a dict for the copy source.\r\n\r\nSmall question about the tests but otherwise looks good.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "kyleknap", "comment_id": 220704323, "datetime": 1463774383000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_1 I updated all cases where a shared property was returning a mutable object by prefixing them with ``create_`` to hopefully make that more clear. Let me know what you think.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "jamesls", "comment_id": 220707124, "datetime": 1463775140000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": ":shipit: Looks good.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "spyder-issues-migrator", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1424207950000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "_From [luki.hut...@gmail.com](https://code.google.com/u/105387061838313348230/) on 2014-09-30T12:28:36Z_\n\nSpyder Version: 2.3.1\r\nPython Version: 2.7.8\r\nQt Version : 4.8.6, PyQt4 (API v2) 4.11.1 on Darwin\r\npyflakes >=0.5.0: 0.8.1 (OK)\r\npep8 >=0.6 : 1.5.7 (OK)\r\nIPython >=0.13 : 1.0.0 (OK)\r\npygments >=1.6 : 1.6 (OK)\r\npandas >=0.13.1 : 0.14.1 (OK)\r\nsphinx >=0.6.6 : 1.2.3 (OK)\r\npsutil >=0.3 : 2.1.2 (OK)\r\nrope >=0.9.2 : 0.10.2 (OK)\r\nmatplotlib >=1.0: 1.4.0 (OK)\r\nsympy >=0.7.0 : 0.7.5 (OK)\r\npylint >=0.25 : 1.3.1 (OK) \n\nWhat steps will reproduce the problem?\n\n 1. 2. 3. \n\nWhat is the expected output? What do you see instead?\n\n \n\nPlease provide any additional information below\n\n.\n\n_Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/spyderlib/issues/detail?id=1991_", "title": "Spyder stuck at \"Connecting to [IPython] kernel...\" at startup, but can connect to existing kernels", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "spyder-issues-migrator", "comment_id": 74756141, "datetime": 1424207950000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "_From [luki.hut...@gmail.com](https://code.google.com/u/105387061838313348230/) on 2014-10-01T02:04:31Z_\n\nMy system is Mac OS X Mavericks.\r\nI've installed python, numpy, scipy, matplotlib and PyLint via homebrew; all other relevant packages were installed using pip.\r\nPreviously, I had sypder installed as part of the anaconda distribution, which worked smoothly. - Anaconda was removed completely to avoid possible conflicts.\r\n\r\nStarting a ipython qtconsole from the command line works without problems.\r\n\r\nIt is not a firewall issue, as problem persists when the firewall is off.\r\nIndeed, new kernels (.json files) get created (~/.ipython) at every startup of spyder, and I can connect to them manually using \"Connect to existing kernel\".\r\n\r\n\r\nThe inbuilt console reports that \"import sitecustomize\" has failed.\r\nHow can I resolve this issue?\r\n\r\nThank you!\r\nLuki", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "ccordoba12", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1487565507000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "ccordoba12", "comment_id": 280986437, "datetime": 1487565507000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Fixed on Spyder 3.0", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "et1975", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1448028373000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Serving reactor files via mounted GitFS root exposes the backend logic to minions.\r\nIt seems though that reactors being exposed via the roots is not a _requirement_ for them to function and therefore IMHO is an oversight and a security risk. \r\nWhile there are workarounds and ways to hide sensitive information, it is not enough IMHO. Knowing what backend is doing can be of value by itself to an attacker.\r\nWould be great to see GitFS configuration for reactors getting the same treatment as the one for pillars - separate, bypassing the root mounts, and being able to include the reactor.conf itself.", "title": "GitFS for Reactors", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "basepi", "comment_id": 159125755, "datetime": 1448329655000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "You make great points here, and I think this is a great idea. Thanks for the request.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "mew1033", "comment_id": 183488710, "datetime": 1455311297000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "This is definitely something I want. Reactors should be store-able in gitfs without exposing them to minions.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Da-Juan", "comment_id": 234481253, "datetime": 1469175011000, "masked_author": "username_3", "text": "I'm interested in this too!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "spyd3r", "comment_id": 237391178, "datetime": 1470262283000, "masked_author": "username_4", "text": "I'm interested in this feature as well.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "c4t3l", "comment_id": 249889371, "datetime": 1474988091000, "masked_author": "username_5", "text": "+1 internets for this idea!", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "thatch45", "comment_id": 249902902, "datetime": 1474990566000, "masked_author": "username_6", "text": "I have added the nitrogen tag here, we would also want to be able to do this with thorium files as well.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "gtmanfred", "comment_id": 345473398, "datetime": 1511041302000, "masked_author": "username_7", "text": "You can put your reactor files in your regular gitfs fileserver, and just reference it using `salt://reactor/whatever.sls`", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "et1975", "comment_id": 345690804, "datetime": 1511183393000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "I'm confused, in the context of the problem (\"hide reactor logic from the minions\") what would that accomplish?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "gtmanfred", "comment_id": 345741403, "datetime": 1511193877000, "masked_author": "username_7", "text": "ahh, i missed that part of the feature request, nevermind.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "et1975", "comment_id": 473351337, "datetime": 1552666937000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "this issue is closed prematurely.", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "apendua", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1425631934000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Would it solve #68?", "title": "Implement all velocity methods, so that we can listen for results from mirrors", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "apendua", "comment_id": 85019046, "datetime": 1427120392000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_1 What do you think about this one?\r\n\r\nThe idea is basically that Gagarin could start a mirror and listen to tests results. It should be relatively easy to implement because it's a matter of providing appropriate environment variables to the mirror process, right?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "samhatoum", "comment_id": 85042507, "datetime": 1427123560000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "That's a great idea and yes it should be doable using the ENV vars. I would experiment with this approach and collect some findings. \r\n\r\nWe've been talking about a new lifecycle for Velocity and how to rewrite mirrors to make them more robust. you can [see the hackpad here](https://velocity.hackpad.com/Important-topics-for-velocitycore-nN6VyVoOaeO).", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "apendua", "comment_id": 85047922, "datetime": 1427124159000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_1 Thanks! I will take a look.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Laboratory", "comment_id": 86616702, "datetime": 1427388410000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "no velocity, it's bad idea :/", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "samhatoum", "comment_id": 86618167, "datetime": 1427388508000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_2 Care to elaborate?", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "apendua", "comment_id": 86618476, "datetime": 1427388530000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_2 I don't agree. Imagine you already have a project with a lot of velocity tests, which you don't want to rewrite yet you still want to use Gagarin as a single test runner.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Laboratory", "comment_id": 86621803, "datetime": 1427388838000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "My test written with velocity doesn't run for 3 weeks and no one can help me.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "apendua", "comment_id": 86621941, "datetime": 1427388863000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "@username_2 Anyway, we don't want any kind of \"frameworks wars\" here on GitHub. It's not for expressing private opinions but for a technical discussion.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Laboratory", "comment_id": 86622211, "datetime": 1427388903000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_1 https://github.com/meteor-velocity/velocity/issues/281", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Laboratory", "comment_id": 86623134, "datetime": 1427389031000, "masked_author": "username_2", "text": "@username_0, ok, sorry", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "samhatoum", "comment_id": 105171272, "datetime": 1432544088000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "@username_0 want to meet again to pick up where we left off? Velocity had really advanced since we spoke :)", "title": null, "type": "comment" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "Keenan1", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1433176176000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "after implementing the slider i am having issues with jquery mobile triggering tap evens while sliding, thanks for the help in advance", "title": "jquery mobile interference ", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "nolimits4web", "comment_id": 109576410, "datetime": 1433596134000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "Would be good to see live example or JSFiddle", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Keenan1", "comment_id": 109576835, "datetime": 1433596271000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Thanks but choose to use framwork7 instead jquery has to many issues .", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "nolimits4web", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1433698802000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]

[ { "action": "opened", "author": "DaPhexion", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1426574689000, "masked_author": "username_0", "text": "Plaintext? It should use at least use symmetric cryptography, so it can only be decoded using a password.", "title": "Security Issue with Puppet Files.", "type": "issue" }, { "action": "created", "author": "Afforess", "comment_id": 84217891, "datetime": 1426903123000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "The files are stored in your browser's local storage, not any remote server. There is no point in encrypting a local file.", "title": null, "type": "comment" }, { "action": "closed", "author": "Afforess", "comment_id": null, "datetime": 1426903123000, "masked_author": "username_1", "text": "", "title": null, "type": "issue" } ]