Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/080522.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 15:13:57+00:00

Document:
EDDIE BAUER: Seeks Dismissal of "Scherer" Labor Suit in Calif.
arrangement meant to drive competing publishers out of business.
BookLocker sues on behalf of "thousands of POD publishers . . .
BookLocker says it has a catalogue of 1,200 POD titles.
books a month for 4,300 publishers.
2008 through the conclusion of trial of this matter.
ongoing and future violations of the law.
injunctive relief under the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.
equitable and proper by the Court.
which will be funded from cash and available facilities.
when the case opened on Oct. 4, 2007.
transferred to the Federal Court in Sydney.
(previously Sept. 20, 2002) and May 26, 2003.
four other shareholders had filed details of their claims.
econometrician Fred Dunbar testified for the shareholders.
righted an inflated profit forecast in December 2002. Mr.
AUD10 million to AUD20 million in damages.
now suggests a range between 35c and $1.10 a share.
would be below analysts' forecasts.
over failure to disclose material information.
purported securities class action suit entitled "Levine v.
AtriCure, Inc., Case No. 06 CV 14324," dismissed.
Offering in August 2005 through Feb. 16, 2006.
for reconsideration of that denial is currently pending.
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
Brookdale's May 8, 2008 Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
-- that the defendants were unjustly enriched.
the issuance of the court's order.
On Nov. 21, 2006, an amended complaint was filed in the action.
defendants in the Second Action.
those facilities by Ventas to subsidiaries of BLC.
intends to vigorously defend the Second Action.
Minot, North Dakota in 2002.
Esq., who represented the plaintiffs, said.
railroad after Feb. 17, 2002, a month after the derailment.
each received several hundred dollars, AP relates.
"slightly less" than the $1,300.
the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Oklahoma and Texas.
trebling of actual damages, civil penalties and attorney's fees.
Subsequently, the plaintiffs dropped CEGT and MRT as defendants.
certification, no class was certified.
refused to dismiss the Arkansas claims.
of CenterPoint Energy, Inc., a public utility holding company.
service in the State of Louisiana.
LPSC relating to the same alleged rate overcharges.
the resolution of the proceedings by the LPSC.
purchases were reviewed back to 1971.
damages, civil penalties and attorney's fees.
affiliates pending in state court in Stevens County, Kansas.
mismeasurement of the British thermal unit content of the gas.
Commission for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
fraud class action suit filed against ChoicePoint, Inc.
the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
connection with the fraudulent data access.
Northern District of Georgia on March 11, 22, and 24, 2005.
to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
compensatory damages, attorneys' fees, costs, and other relief.
currently pending before the District Court.
Court for the Northern District of Georgia.
District of Georgia, Judge Jack T. Camp presiding.
matter, "Curtis R. Mellot v. ChoicePoint Inc., et al., Case No.
motions for the approval of the settlement of the litigation.
The class action was filed on May 20, 2005, before the U.S.
equitable relief, attorneys' fees and costs.
of the case in its entirety.
for reconsideration, which was also denied by the trial court.
to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
balanced and diversified investment portfolio.
judge jurisdiction to review and approve the settlement.
the Northern District of Georgia, Judge Jack T. Camp presiding.
the quarter ended March 29, 2008.
subject to a final approval by the court.
the filing of certain notices related to class action lawsuits.
Commission for the quarter ended March 29, 2008.
before the Superior Court of California, County of San Diego.
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended March 29, 2008.
Eddie Bauer's common stock was inadequate.
taking effect, as well as payment of attorneys' fees.
two lawsuits were subsequently consolidated.
fees was denied. The plaintiffs appealed this ruling.
Washington dismissed the remaining case with prejudice.
foreclosure, CourtHouse News Service reports.
statutory and common law in effect.
(i) the actual interest rate on the note(s) (12 C.F.R.
and Class members would be paying on the Note(s).
(b) whether the defendants' conduct violated 12 C.F.R.
(c) whether the defendants' conduct violated 12 C.F.R.
-- reasonable attorneys' fees and costs.
prefectures of Tokyo, Saitama and Chiba.
banning production of the material.
issued warnings in 1972 that asbestos could be a carcinogen.
under Japan's Building Standards Law.
who heads the group of plaintiffs, told Afrique en ligne.
the state and the manufacturers."
before the Yokohama District Court.
as a fire retardant, for sound absorption, and for insulation.
was banned in Japan in 1975.
securities laws (Class Action Reporter, Oct. 3, 2007).
from May 29, 2003, to June 4, 2004.
to the company's May 8, 2008 Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
The suit is "Kaltman v. Key Energy Serv., In, et al., Case No.
Western District of Texas, Judge Robert A. Junell presiding.
Hoeffner, Bilek & Eidman, L.L.P.
InteractiveCorp., is facing a lawsuit filed before the U.S.
confidential customer information, Dow Jones reports.
2006, and May 1, 2008.
accessed and stolen by several LendingTree employees.
immediately return Dow Jones' phone call seeking comment.
meal and rest breaks, among other violations.
-- Five Star Car Wash.
at their carwashes and urged to comply with the labor code.
response to widespread abuses in the carwash industry.
predecessor of the company's New Mexico HMO.
for injunctive and declaratory relief.
claims for injunctive and declaratory relief.
2. "Benjamin v. Netlist, Inc., Case No. 07 CV5518."
Nov. 30, 2006 Initial Public Offering.
They seek unspecified monetary damages and other relief.
the Central District of California.
2007, generally asserting the same claims.
complaint on Jan. 9, 2008.
The suit is "Bruce Belodoff v. Netlist Inc et al., Case No.
Pension & Welfare Fund v. Omnicare, Inc., et al., No.
-- "Chi v. Omnicare, Inc., et al., No. 2:06cv31."
Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
the valuation of receivables and the valuation of inventories.
briefed as of May 1, 2007.
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund, on July 27, 2007.
plaintiffs' motion to add an additional named plaintiff.
of the lower court's decision.
appeal has not been scheduled.
Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, Judge William O.
The suit is "Gindling v. Playlogic Entertainment, Inc., Case No.
Southern District of New York, Judge Jed S. Rakoff, presiding.
securities fraud litigation that is pending with the U.S.
according to SiRF's May 8, 2008 Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
consolidated amended complaint to be filed shortly.
Litigation, Case No. 3:2008cv00856," filed before the U.S.
securities fraud class action suit filed against it in the U.S.
the company's May 8, 2008 Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
dismissal motion, and later denied the dismissal request.
certain of its current officers and directors.
2004, the lead plaintiff filed a consolidated amended complaint.
first three quarters of 2003.
the company's stock price to be artificially inflated.
during the period from March 28, 2002, through March 26, 2004.
the plaintiff to file an amended complaint.
hearing on the motions and took the matter under advisement.
class certification, which the defendants have opposed.
the litigation for $40.0 million.
the settlement subject to class notice and other conditions.
District of Massachusetts, Judge Douglas P. Woodlock, presiding.
Superior Court, CBS 5 reports.
California at any time during the past four years.
a phone call seeking comment on the suit.
of a Wahl electric shaver on May 11.
Sales tax in California is 8.25%, the report says.
to be more than $10 million.
company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minn.
Phase III clinical trials of Lonidamine (TH-070).
On Sept. 14, 2007, these lawsuits were transferred to the U.S.
Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton presiding.
pending against TOP Ships -- formerly known as TOP Tankers Inc.
-- and certain of its directors and officers.
March 13, 2006, and Nov. 29, 2006, inclusive.
fraud class action. The suit is alleging violations of the U.S.
accounting for the sale and leaseback of the vessels.
putative class actions (Class Action Reporter, May 4, 2007).
dividend" and thereby overstating its financial condition.
which have not been determined, will be paid out of this amount.
complaint last fall after TOPS initially moved to dismiss.
2008. Deadline to file claims is on September 12, 2008.
The first identified complaint is "Bhojwani v. Pistiolis et al.
Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge Richard C.
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale & Dorr L.L.P.
fees for visitors to Summit Lake, a Denver mountain park.
collections and unjust enrichment,” according to TechSpot.
measly credit to your monthly bill.
District of Massachusetts against Xerium Technologies, Inc.
complaint on June 8, 2006.
Nov, 15, 2005." The litigation is presently in discovery.
The suit is "Parkside Capital Ltd. v. Xerium Technologies Inc.
et al., Case No. 1:06-cv-10991-RWZ," filed before the U.S.
District Court for the District of Massachusetts, Judge Rya W.
2006, and March 14, 2008, inclusive.
per share on March 17, 2008.
artificially inflating the market price of its securities.
hold such securities as of February 13, 2008.
and the auction market in which those securities traded.
auction rate securities would result.
have long-term maturities or no maturity dates.
liquidate their positions in these securities.
market for auction rate securities would result.

References: v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.