Source: http://revista.sangregorio.edu.ec/index.php/REVISTASANGREGORIO/article/view/755
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 16:36:39+00:00

Document:
Ensuring the safety of participants in criminal proceedings is one of the important guarantees for the achievement of the goal of modern Russian criminal justice: involvement of a guilty person or release of an innocent person from punishment. The achievement of this important result can be based on an assessment of the evidence obtained. The citizens' assistance to establish evidence in the work of law enforcement agencies causes certain contradictions. The interests of the state in combating crime and the legitimate interests of a citizen can be asymmetric. In this regard, the state shall create the necessary and sufficient conditions for motivating such assistance. Otherwise, the citizen is not able to potentially assist in the criminal proceedings, as this constitutes a threat to his/her (close relatives) interests. It is particularly relevant to define the optimal balance of state and personal interests in the criminal proceedings. The citizens can facilitate the investigation only when they feel completely safe. At the same time, not only witnesses and victims (their relatives) shall be provided with the protective measures, but a suspect (accused), who promotes criminal justice, as well. The article presents an analysis of the formation and development of the personal security institution in the Russian criminal process. The articles shows the main problems of balancing the interests of the state in combating crime and ensuring the legitimate personal interests of a citizen.
Epikhin, A.Y. et al. Protection by the government and security support for the parties of modern criminal process in Russia: Problems and perspectives, Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues Volume 19, Special Issue, 2016.
Judgment of the European Court of 26 March 1996 on the merits of the application N 20524/92 Doorson v. the Netherlands. § 70.
Judgment of the European Court of 28 March 2002 on the merits of the applications N 47698/99 and 48115/99 Birutis and Others v. Lithuania, § 34, 35.
Judgment of the European Court of 28 February 2006 on the merits of the application N 51277/99 Krasniki v. Czech Republic, § 64 – 86.
Brusnitsyn L.V. Ensuring the Safety of Persons Assisting Criminal Justice: World Experience and Development of Russian Legislation (Procedural Research). M.: Yurlitinform, 2010.
Information on the ECHR Decision Dated 28.02.2006 in the Case Krasniki v. the Czech Republic (Claim No. 51277/99) // Bulletin of the European Court of Human Rights. 2006. No. 9.
Kvashis V., Vavilov L. We will help the Crime Victims // Russian Justice. 1994. No. 4.
Mishyn A.V. Ensuring the Security of Participants in Pre-Trial Proceedings in a Criminal Case: Tactical Problem and Its Solution // Bulletin of the Volga University. V.N. Tatishcheva. 2017. V. 2. No. 4. P. 183-189.
ECHR Decision dated 23.04.1997 "Van Mechelen and Others v. the Netherlands" (Claim No. 21363/93, 21364/93, 21427/93 and 22056/93) [Rus. (extract), Eng.] // European Court of Human Rights. Selected Decisions. V. 2. - M.: Norma, 2000. P. 440 - 454.
РRussian Yearbook of the European Convention on Human Rights)" (Edition 1) ("Statut", 2015) // Legal Reference System "Consultant Plus".
Samuticheva E.Yu. The Expert's Opinion and Assessment in the Criminal Process (Comparative Legal Study): Abstract of a Thesis of the Candidate of Legal Sciences. М., 2016.
Tikhonov L. The Victim: Criminal Procedural Aspect // Soviet Justice. 1993. No. 19.

References: v. 
 § 70
 v. 
 § 34
 v. 
 § 64
 v. 
 V. 
 v. 
 V.