Source: https://www.iejme.com/article/studying-the-practice-of-performance-assessment-and-rating-system-implementation-in-higher
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 13:58:22+00:00

Document:
Reference: Frolova VB, Kalugina OA, Artamonova LS, Boykov AI. Studying the Practice of Performance Assessment and Rating System Implementation in Higher Institutions. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(5), 1185-1193.
Reference: Frolova, V. B., Kalugina, O. A., Artamonova, L. S., & Boykov, A. I. (2016). Studying the Practice of Performance Assessment and Rating System Implementation in Higher Institutions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1185-1193.
Reference: Frolova, Victoria B., Olga A. Kalugina, Larisa S. Artamonova, and Alexander I. Boykov. "Studying the Practice of Performance Assessment and Rating System Implementation in Higher Institutions". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2016 11 no. 5 (2016): 1185-1193.
Reference: Frolova, V. B., Kalugina, O. A., Artamonova, L. S., and Boykov, A. I. (2016). Studying the Practice of Performance Assessment and Rating System Implementation in Higher Institutions. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(5), pp. 1185-1193.
Reference: Frolova, Victoria B. et al. "Studying the Practice of Performance Assessment and Rating System Implementation in Higher Institutions". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 5, 2016, pp. 1185-1193.
Reference: Frolova VB, Kalugina OA, Artamonova LS, Boykov AI. Studying the Practice of Performance Assessment and Rating System Implementation in Higher Institutions. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(5):1185-93.
This paper investigates the results of studying the practice of performance assessment and rating system implementation in higher institutions. The key methods of the study are conversations, observations, system analysis, synthesis, generalization which allow us to evaluate the peculiarities of the rating system components which depend on the particular characteristics of the higher institutions, discipline, year of study and students’ academic performance. The article considers the role of the organization and the basis of the rating system in the educational process; the appropriate proportion of scores’ distribution for formative and summative assessment is presented; characteristics of students of the university are identified. We find robust evidence that differentiation and ranking of students’ works including their evaluation, taking into account the form and the year of study, in order to achieve students’ involvement in the work and objective assessment of the outcomes are necessary. The results of the research, conclusions and recommendations are targeted at improvement and development of performance assessment and rating system in higher institutions.
Akopov, G. V. & Gorbacheva, A. V. (2003) Social psychology of a student as an agent of the educational process. Moscow: Engineering-1. 267p.
Bakshaeva, N. A. (2006) Psychology of students’ motivation. Moscow: Logos. 183 p.
Bírová, J., Barancová, M. & Šimková, Z. (2016) A note on terminology: Bilingualism, plurilingualism and plurilingual intercultural competence or are we all plurilingual. [K pojmosloviu bilinvizmu, plurilingvizmu a viacjazycnej interkulturnej kompetencii alebo sme vsetci viacjazycni]. XLinguae, 9(2), 114-127.
Borzov, T. V. (2016) Educational psychology in Teaching Students to Understand things (PhD thesis). Samara: the Volga region. state. Social-humanitarian. Acad.
Frolova, V. B. (2013) The Use of Interactive Forms of Learning in the Teaching Discipline «Financial Management». Scientific methodological electronic journal Concept, 10, 1-5.
Gibadullin I. G. (2011) Point-rating system in Physical Education classes in Higher Institutions. Izhevsk: IzhGTU. 139p.
Gorin, Y. V. & Kaminsky, V. V. (2005) The Rating System in the Organization of Giving Students Knowledge of the Basic Scientific Concepts in the Engineering High School. Advances in current natural sciences, 11, 89-90.
Guzeev, V. V. (2001) Pedagogical Techniques in the context of Educational Technology. Moscow: Public education.126p.
Kalugina, O. A. (2015) The Formation of Professional and Communicative Competency by Competency-Oriented Exercises (From the Experience of Teaching in a Non-linguistic Institute of Higher Education). Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice, 10-2 (52), 103-106.
Permyakov, O. E., Zhadan, V. A. & Melnikov, S. V. (2006) The Influence of Score-rating System on Motivation of Students’ Cognitive Activity and Teachers’ Professional Activity. Bulletin of Tomsk Polytechnic University, 6(309), 216-221.
Porshneva, E. & Abdulmianova, I. (2015) Assessing the Maturity of General Professional Competencies of Future Interpreters/ Translators: Problems and Solutions. XLinguae, 8(4), 60-65.
Sabirova, D. K. & Shved, N.G. (2005) On Development of Methodical Support of Students’ Abilities with Use of the Rating System. Vestnik KGTU named after A.N. Tupoleva, 2, 69-72.
Selevko, H. K. (2006) Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. Mozhaysk: (Moscow region): Mozhajskij Polygraph. 815p.
Solodyannikov, V. A. (2010) The Rating System in assessment of the activities of the participants of the pedagogical process. St. Petersburg: SPbSUSE.117 p.
Vlasyuk, L. L. (2015) Interactive forms of training for university professors. Magnitogorsk: Publishing House of the Magnitogorsk State tehn. University named after G.I. Nosov. 161 p.
Zhiginas, N. V. (2011) Psychology of students' identity crisis: Personological concept, Phenomenology, Medical and Psychological Support (PhD thesis). St. Petersburg.
Zimnyaya, I. A. (1989) Psychology of a student as an actor of educational activity. Moscow: B.I. 130p.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.