Source: http://rimaslawfirm.com/rimaslaw/experience
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 05:50:08+00:00

Document:
Cartones Ponderosa S A de C V vs Marcom Services Inc, (Minn. Dist.) legal counsel for prevailing Mexican manufacturer in collection action.
Master Leather v. Wen Products (D.Minn) lead counsel for plaintiff of breach of contract claim involving distribution of waxer and polisher supplies (favorably settled). (Illinois case transferred to Minnesota) 899 F.Supp. 384 (N.D. Ill.).
Mattson Spray v. Lin (D.Minn., W.D.Wis.) lead counsel for Taiwanese defendant in breach of contract involving spray equipment (favorably settled).
Schaefer Fan v. J & D Mfg. (D.Minn.) lead counsel for defendant in breach of settlement agreement claim and on appeal (Fed. Cir.) 265 F.3d 1283, 60 U.S.P.Q.2d (BNA) 1194.
Benson Optical Co v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (D.Minn.) represented prevailing copyright owner in obtaining consent judgment.
Whelan v. Golden Shovel Agency, LLC (D.Minn.) represented copyright owner in copyright case.
Koerber v. New Millennium Academy (Minn.Dist.) favorable resolution of pregnancy discrimination claim.
Nu-Life Products, Inc. v. Henricksen (D.Minn.) counsel for prevailing defendant dismissing plaintiiffs’ employment and noncompete claims in connection with religious products.
Wolkenbrod v. AllianceOne Receivables Management, Inc. (D.Minn) favorable resolution of employment and Whistleblower claims.
Country Inns & Suites by Carlson, Inc. v. Sai Nath Investments, Inc. (D.Minn.) counsel for franchisee and guarantors in franchise litigation.
Royal Bank of Canada, Dain Rauscher v. RBC Dain Rauscher WIPO Case No. D2001-1236; 2002 GENDND 233. (WIPO 2002) lead counsel for prevailing Complainants, which received the transfer of the contested domain name <rbcdainrauscher.com>.
Capital Midwest Fund v. Regents of the University of Minnesota (Minn.Dist.) counsel for investors with fraud claims resulting from the subscription of shares in a medical technology startup.
Minke v. Bankwest, Freedom Solutions (Minn.Dist.) counsel for investors with fraud claims resulting from the sale of life settlements adjudicated by jury trial.
Ace Orthopedic v. Orthomet (D.Minn.) counsel for prevailing plaintiff of patent infringement claims for orthopedic surgical fixation screw.
Agility Robotics v. KVH Indust. (D.Minn.) lead counsel for plaintiffs of patent infringement claims resulting in license for mobile satellite phones and televisions containing robotic antenna pointing device.
Arium v. Scanner (C.D. Cal.) action for declaratory relief of non-infringement of patent claims under 35 U.S.C. 271(g) and patent infringement involving semiconductor inspection apparatus and methods (dismissed).
Armorlite v. BMC (D.Minn., S.D. Fla.) counsel for defense of patent infringement claim involving composition and method of coating ophthalmic lenses.
Benetton Sportsystem v. First Team Sports (D.N.J.) lead counsel for defense of patent infringement claim involving children’s size adjustable in-line skates.
Emco Enterprises v. Larson Mfg. (S.D. Iowa) lead counsel for defendant resulting in dismissal of patent infringement claim involving door display devices.
ICOS v. Scanner cases, 486 F. Supp. 2d 330 (S.D.N.Y. 2007) lead counsel for patentee of patent infringement claims involving semiconductor inspection apparatus and methods.
J & D Sales v. Schaefer Ventilation (W.D.Wis.) lead counsel for prevailing plaintiff of patent infringement claim involving agricultural equipment.
Minnesota Scientific v. Thompson Surgical (W.D.Mich.) lead counsel for plaintiff of patent infringement claim involving surgical retractor support devices.
Nonvolatile Electronics v. Motorola (D.Minn.) lead counsel for prevailing plaintiff of patent infringement claim involving giant magneto resistive effect memory cell (favorably settled).
Novus v. Glass Mechanix (S.D.Fla.) lead counsel for prevailing plaintiff of patent infringement claim involving windshield repair.
Scanner v. NVIDIA (E.D.Tex.) counsel for patentee of patent infringement claims involving inspection methods of semiconductors (dismissed).
against the government involving robotic manipulators through Markman claim construction hearing.
Ross-Hime Designs, Inc. v. United States, 2015 WL 6733896 (Fed.Cl., Nov. 03, 20150).
United Marine Marketing Group, LLC v. Jet Dock System, Inc. (MDFla.) counsel for plaintiff favorably resolving declaratory judgment claims of non-infringement of patents for dock assemblies.
Snap-on v. SPX (N.D. Ill.) counsel for prevailing party SPX of patent infringement claims involving engine analyzers containing digital displays of waveforms ($44 million arbitration award).
Schaefer Fan Co. v. J & D Mfg., 265 F.3d 1282 (Fed. Cir. 2001).
Kimmel v. ChiropracticUSA (Minn.Dist.) represented plaintiff in malpractice action.
Norman Graphic Printing Company Limited v. Cummins Law Office, P.A. (Minn.Dist.) represented plaintiff Hong Kong manufacturer in legal malpractice action.
Remote Techs., Inc. v. Data Int’l Co. (D.Minn.) counsel for defendant Taiwanese manufacturer in products liability action involving extensive e-discovery ESI.
Remote Techs., Inc. v. Data Int’l Co., 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139986 (D. Minn. Sept. 28, 2012).
Brown v. Grover, Niccum Docks (Minn.Dist) counsel for landowners with claims for quiet title relating to riparian rights.
Carlson v. Branson’s Nantucket, LLC (Minn.Dist.) resolved claim for rescission of timeshare.
PCCP NNN Northstar LLC vs Passport Coffee Inc. (Minn.Dist.) favorably resolved termination of commercial lease.
Nordic Track v. CSA (D.Minn.) lead trial counsel for prevailing plaintiff of Lanham Act claim involving the product configuration of exercise equipment ($1 million judgment).
Federated Mutual v. Federated Investors (T.T.A.B.) lead counsel for prevailing opposer in opposition proceeding resulting in abandonment of the trademark application for FEDERATED for banking services.
Land O’ Lakes v. Milk Specialties (T.T.A.B.) lead counsel for petitioner in cancellation proceeding of the mark for KWIX MIX for milk replacer (favorably settled).
Resistance Tech. v. In’Tech Indust. (D.Minn.) lead trial counsel for plaintiff of Lanham Act and trade secrets claims involving hearing aids (favorably settled).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.