Source: https://chestofbooks.com/business/law/Handbook-Law-Of-Contracts/Application-Of-Payments-Part-2.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 17:57:35+00:00

Document:
9 Jackson v. Burke, 1 Dill. 311, Fed. Cas. No. 7,133; Ayer v. Hawkins, 19 Vt. 26: Williams v. Griffith, 5 Mees. & W. 300; Waugh v. Cope, 6 Mees. & W. 824; Murphy v. Webber, 61 Me. 478; Pond v. Williams, 1 Gray (Mass.) 630; Ramsay v. Warner, 97 Mass. 8; Beck v. Haas, 31 Mo. App. 180. But see Beck v. Haas, 111 Mo. 264, 20 S. W. 19, 33 Am. St. Rep. 516. See "Payment:," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 39; Cent. Dig. §§ 104-H4.
10 Offutt v. King, 1 MacArthur (D. C.) 312; Pearce v. Walker, 103 Ala. 250, 15 South. 568; Cremer v. Higginson, 1 Mason, 337, Fed. Cas. No. 3,383; Mc-Master v. Merrick, 41 Mich. 505, 2 N. W. 895. Nor can the creditor be compelled to change the application. Jefferson v. Church of St. Matthew, 41 Minn. 392, 43 N. W. 74; Seymour v. Marvin, 11 Barb. (N. Y.) 80. -See "Payment," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 39; Cent. Dig. §§ 104-114.
11Devaynes v. Noble (Clayton's Case) 1 Mer. 572, 606. See "Payment," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 41; Cent. Dig. §§ 115-126.
12Pattison v. Hull, 9 Cow. (N. Y.) 747. And see Bacon v. Brown, 1 Bibb (Ky.) 334, 4 Am. Dec. 640; Jones v. Benedict, 83 N. Y. 79; Heyward v. Lo-max, 1 Vera. 24; Prowse v. Wortbinge, 2 Brown & G. 107; Neal v. Allison, 50 Miss. 175; Gwinn v. Whitaker's Adm'x, 1 Har. & J. (Md.) 754; Dorsey v. Gassaway, 2 Har. & J. (Md.) 402, 3 Am. Dec. 557; Perot v. Cooper, 17 Colo. 80, 28 Pac. 391, 31 Am. St. Rep. 258; Robinson v. Doolittle, 12 Vt 246; Moore v. Kiff, 78 Pa. 96; Barrett v. Sipp, 50 Ind. App. 304, 98 N. E. 340. See "Payment:' Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 41; Cent. Dig. §§ 115-126.
13 Field v. Holland, 6 Cranch, 27, 3 L. Ed. 136. And see Burks v. Albert, 4 J. J. Marsh. (Ky.) 97, 20 Am. Dec. 209; Gardner v. Leck, 52 Minn. 522, 54 N. W. 746; Leeds v. Gifford, 41 N. J. Eq. 464, 5 Atl. 795; The D. B. Steel-man (D. C.) 48 Fed. 5S0; Stamford Bank v. Benedict, 15 Conn. 437; Hilton v. Burley, 2 N. H. 193; Cain v. Vogh, 138 Iowa, 631, 116 N. W. 786, 128 Am. St. Rep. 216. In a later case, under the same rule (the rule of equitable application), the payments were so applied as to operate beneficially to the sureties of the debtor, and against the creditor. United States v. Kirkpat-rick, 9 Wheat 737, 6 L. Ed. 199. If the money paid is the proceeds of a security given for one debt, it will be applied in payment of that debt in preference to an unsecured debt. Lee v. Manley, 154 N. C. 244, 70 S. E. 385. See "Payment," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 41; Cent. Dig. §§ 115-126.
14 Smith v. Loyd, 11 Leigh (Va.) 512, 37 Am. Dec. 621; Stone v. Seymour, 15 Wend. (N. Y.) 19; White v. Trumbull, 15 N. J. Law, 314, 29 Am. Dec. 6S7; Allen v. Culver, 3 Denio (N. Y.) 284; Pierce v. Knight, 31 Vt. 701; Crompton v. Pratt, 105 Mass. 255. See "Payment;' Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 41; Cent. Dig. §§ 115-126.
15Hersey v. Bennett, 28 Minn. 8G, 9 N. W. 590, 41 Am. Rep. 271. And see Miller v. Miller, 23 Me. 22, 39 Am. Dec. 597; Bobe's Heirs v. Stickney, 36 Ala. 482. See "Payment," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 41; Cent. Dig. §§ 115-126.
16 Hersey v. Bennett, 28 Minn. 86, 9 N. W. 590, 41 Am. Rep. 271. And see Peale v. Grossman, 70 W. Va. 1, 73 S. E. 46, Ann. Cas. 1913C, 1373. See "Payment," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 41; Cent. Dig. §§ 115-126.
17 Devaynes v. Noble (Clayton's Case), 1 Mer. 572; Hersey v. Bennett, 28 Minn. 86, 9 N. W. 590, 41 Am. Rep. 271; Miller v. Miller, 23 Me. 22, 39 Am. Dec. 597; Parks v. Ingram, 22 N. H. 283, 55 Am. Dec. 153; Pierce v. Knight, 31 Vt 701; Crompton v. Pratt, 105 Mass. 255; Smith v. Loyd, 11 Leigh (Va.) 512, 37 Am. Dec. 621; Hill v. Bobbins, 22 Mich. 475; Winnebago Mills v. Travis, 56 Minn. 480, 58 N. W. 36; Cushing v. Wyman, 44 Me. 121; Fair-child v. Holly, 10 Conn. 175; Truscott v. King, 6 N. Y. 147; Jones v. United States, 7 How. 681, 12 L. Ed. 870; United States v. Kirkpatrick, 9 Wheat. 720, 6 L. Ed. 199; Emery v. Tichout, 13 Vt. 15; Frazer v. Miller, 7 Wash. 521, 35 Pac. 427; Sternberger v. Gowdy, 93 Ky. 14G, 19 S. W. 186; Sprague v. Hazenwinkle, 53 111. 419. In Kansas this rule yields to the rule that a payment will be applied to an unsecured rather than to a secured debt. State v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co., 81 Kan. 660, 106 Pac. 1040. 26 L. R. A. (N. S.) 865. See "Payment," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 43; Cent. Dig. § 122.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 39
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 39
 v. 
 § 41
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 41
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 41
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 41
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 41
 v. 
 v. 
 § 41
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 43
 § 122