Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/090803.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 20:22:14+00:00

Document:
AMAZON.COM LLC: Faces Litigation Over Mass Deletion of "1984"
PULASKI COUNTY: Ark. Court Denies Certification Bid in "Jackson"
thoughtless, and painfully out of line with our principles."
year-old high school student who had purchased Orwell's "1984"
to complete a summer homework assignment.
the electronic notes he had taken worthless.
Amazon's bank account to recover a mistaken overpayment."
from improperly accessing people's Kindles in the future.
on internet, technology, and privacy issues.
even greater consequences if a quick precedent is not set.
and Michael Aschenbrener, both of KamberEdelson.
certain information relating to the Apple Computer, Inc.
the annual meeting held on April 21, 2005.
injunctive and other relief for purported injury to the company.
directly as an individual shareholder.
and with leave to amend as to the directors.
On May 8, 2007, the plaintiff filed a fourth amended complaint.
the defendant and ordered the case dismissed with prejudice.
Action Reporter, Jan. 7, 2009).
company's July 22, 2009 Form 10-Q Filing with the U.S.
the online sale of third-party audio and video products.
v. Apple Inc.," remains pending.
The action, entitled, "Birdsong v. Apple Computers Inc.,"
risk of noise-induced hearing loss by iPod users.
four-year period before Jan. 31, 2006.
An amended complaint was subsequently filed in "Birdsong,"
law-based claims equivalent to those in "Patterson."
amended complaint on Jan. 16, 2007.
which the company again sought to have dismissed.
The suit is "Birdsong v. Apple Inc., Case No. 5:06-cv-02280-JW,"
California, Judge James Ware, presiding.
their case, which named Apple Computer, Inc., as a defendant.
Court for the Northern District of California on Aug. 24, 2006.
grants and issuing false financial statements.
Employees' Retirement System as lead plaintiff.
Exchange Act, as well as state law.
accounting and damages in an unspecified amount.
any amended complaint could only be styled as a derivative case.
file a first amended consolidated class action complaint.
judgment dismissing the case on June 12, 2008.
Commission for the quarter ended June 27, 2009.
District of California, Judge Jeremy Fogel, presiding.
normal use, rendering the screen unreadable.
order of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation.
answered the Master Complaint on Nov. 20, 2006.
advertising and warranty laws and claiming unjust enrichment.
for the quarter ended June 27, 2009.
A ruling on the class action complaint styled, "Royer-Brennan v.
behalf of iPod purchasers in Quebec.
The hearing on the motion to amend took place on April 24, 2009.
The Court has not issued a ruling yet.
competition) and the California Consumer Legal Remedies Act.
The plaintiff seeks unspecified damages and other relief.
Action Reporter, Jan. 29, 2009).
certification motion took place on June 30, 2009.
San Francisco County Superior Court on Feb. 17, 2005.
transfer the case to Santa Clara County Superior Court.
opening of the Apple Retail stores.
The company filed a demurrer to the amended complaint on Jan.
purported consumer class for Oct. 17, 2008.
claims is set for a hearing on Jan. 30, 2009.
denied on Dec. 17, 2008.
which did not take place because on Feb. 23, 2009, Hon. Jamie A.
invalid by the Canadian Court.
The company has completed a refund program for this levy.
A class certification hearing took place Jan. 13, 2006.
notice was published during the last week of March 2006.
The trial was conducted on Oct. 15 and Oct. 16, 2007.
board fails at an abnormally high rate.
the Court granted on March 13, 2007.
The plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on March 26, 2007.
ruling (Class Action Reporter, Jan. 29, 2009).
company in its July 22, 2009 Form 10-Q Filing with the U.S.
Inc." -- formerly "Slattery v. Apple Computer, Inc." -- on Jan.
maintenance of monopoly market power.
monopolization. It seeks unspecified damages and other relief.
a purported class-action suit on July 21, 2006, before the U.S.
plaintiff sought unspecified damages and other relief.
complaint, which request was denied by the Court.
material allegations and asserting numerous defenses.
plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on April 19, 2007.
The class certification hearing took place on Dec. 16, 2008.
pleadings as to plaintiffs' tying claims.
plaintiffs pursue a rule of reason tying claim.
District of California, Judge James Ware, presiding.
The Katriel Law Firm, P.L.L.C.
JF," which was dismissed on June 12, 2008.
The suit is "Vogel et al. v. Apple, Inc. et al., Case No.
Northern District of California, Judge Jeremy Fogel, presiding.
young children who have autism.
Composix(R) Kugel(R) product beginning in December 2005.
from use of the products.
causation and/or (v) attorneys' fees.
the remainder in various other jurisdictions.
Medical Center as an additional named plaintiff.
The action was re-named as "St. Francis Medical Center, et al.
in violation of state and federal antitrust laws.
Marie Price of The Journal Record reports.
for legal costs, according to The Journal Record.
agreement, reports The Journal Record.
unknown class members, The Journal Record reported.
Carbon Co., CCC USA, Inc., and China Synthetic Rubber Corp.
medical monitoring, unjust enrichment and punitive damages.
carbon black in the world.
case, according to Native American Times.
settlement fund, plus expenses of approximately $1,800,000.
Action Reporter, Sept. 24, 2009).
contained material misstatements and material omissions.
such impairments in the financial statements.
The suit is "Hutchison v. Cbre Rlty Finance Inc et al., Case No.
District of Connecticut, Judge Stefan R. Underhill, presiding.
all investors who purchased or otherwise acquired Genzyme Corp.
Act and SEC Rule 10b-5.
to contamination at one of the manufacturing facilities.
excluding defendants and their affiliates.
according to Canwest News Service.
plaintiffs told Canwest News Service.
practices on guaranteed products, TheStar.com reports.
declined dramatically," it reads, according to TheStar.com.
a consolidated securities fraud class-action lawsuit in the U.S.
30, 2008 (Class Action Reporter, Sept. 25, 2008).
Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated.
the District of New Jersey, Judge William H. Walls, presiding.
LP et al v. A/D Value Fund L.P. et al, Case No. 5:2009cv00080."
company violated securities laws by concealing the bribes.
medical treatment, The Associated Press reports.
caption, "Jackson v. Johnson et al, Case No. 4:2008-cv-02271."
Speer and several "John Does."
administrator and other as-yet-unidentified officials.
injury," reports The Associated Press.
company's July 23, 2009 Form 10-Q Filing with the U.S.
will be formally litigated or resolved.
company was allegedly in violation of F.A.A. safety regulations.
to long-haul routes, including transcontinental service.
pay, according to Southeast Texas Record.
Fair Labor Standards Act, Southeast Texas Record reported.
due to Defendant's willful violations of the FLSA."
exemplary damages, reports Southeast Texas Record.
the company's global net sales.
In February 2009, competition authorities in Brazil, the U.S.
certain Whirlpool affiliates and executives located in Brazil.
actions, to minimize its potential exposure.
with the pricing of compressors from 1996 to the present.
allegations are being combined in one proceeding in the U.S.
hermetic compressors for refrigeration systems.
criteria and be made on or before Sept. 21, 2009.
Court for the District of Massachusetts against Genzyme Corp.
period is from June 26, 2008 through July 21, 2009.
criteria and be made on or before Sept. 28, 2009.
1, 2007 and October 30, 2008.
services, in North America and internationally.
purchasers of IGT common stock during the Class Period.
J.P. Morgan Issuing Trust and the Certificates it would issue.
standards were based on and met such standards.
mortgage loan pools held by each J.P. Morgan Issuing Trust.
guidelines, and that loan purchasing guidelines were ignored.
known and the price dropped.
Inc. between May 21, 2006 and October 21, 2008, inclusive.
the offerings of these Funds.
criteria and be made on or before Aug. 7, 2009.
Company's Initial Public Offering on February 7, 2007.
the stock to drop 9 percent.
criteria and be made on or before Sept. 22, 2009.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.