Source: https://www.lamsade.dauphine.fr/mcda/biblio/Year/2003.complete.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 02:05:28+00:00

Document:
W.H.E. Day and F.R. McMorris. Axiomatic Consensus Theory in Group Choice and Biomathematics. SIAM, Philadelphia, 2003.
Catalyze Ltd. HIVIEW3 Starter Guide. Catalyze Ltd, London, 2003.
N.F. Matsatsinis and Y. Siskos. Intelligent Support Systems for Marketing Decision. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2003.
J. Pictet and D. Bollinger. Adjuger un marché au mieux-disant. Analyse multicritère, pratique et droit des marchés publics. Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes, Lausanne, 2003.
C. Henggeler Antunes and A.G. Martins, editors. OR Models for Energy Policy, Planning and Management. Annals of Operations Research, 120/121, 2003.
A. Ruszczynski and A. Shapiro, editors. Stochastic Programming, Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, Volume 10. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2003.
M. Janowitz, F-J. LaPointe, F.R. McMorris, B. Mirkin, and F.S. Roberts, editors. Bioconsensus, DIMACS Series, Volume 61. American Mathematical Society, Providence, 2003.
B. Kasemir, M. Gardner, J. Jäger, and C. Jaeger, editors. Public Participation in Sustainability Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
R. Azibi. Construction des critères en aide à la décision: Aspects méthodologiques, techniques et pratiques. PhD thesis, Université Paris-Dauphine, 2003.
S. Damart. Aide à la décision et processus de décision collectifs: La contribution des outils d'aide à la décision aux démarches de concertation. PhD thesis, Université Paris-Dauphine, Paris, 2003.
Myriam Merad. Apport des méthodes d'aide multicritère à la décision pour l'analyse et la gestion des risques liés aux mouvements de terrains induits par les ouvrages souterrains. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris-Dauphine, 2003.
Lambert Rousseau. Comparaison de points de vue pour la formulation de problèmes. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris-Dauphine, 2003.
Olivier Spanjaar. Exploitation de préférences non-classiques dans les problèmes combinatoires : modèles et algorithmes pour les graphes. Thèse de doctorat, Université Paris-Dauphine, 2003.
Martin Josef Geiger. A Computational Study of Genetic Crossover Operators for Multi-Objective Vehicle Routing Problem with Soft Time Windows. In Walter Habenicht, Beate Scheubrein, and Ralph Scheubrein, editors,Multi-Criteria- und Fuzzy Systeme in Theorie und Praxis -- Lösungsansätze für Entscheidungsprobleme mit komplexen Zielsystemen, pages 191--207. Gabler Verlag, Wiesbaden, 2003.
P.-A. Haldi and J. Pictet. Multicriteria output integration analysis. In B. Eliasson and Lee Y.Y., editors,Integrated assessment of sustainable energy systems in China (The China technology program). A framework for decision support in the electric sector of Shandong province, pages 661-701. Kluwer, Dordrecht, 2003.
J.X. Kasperson, R.E. Kasperson, N. Pidgeon, and P. Slovic. The social amplification of risk: Assessing fifteen years of research and theory. In N. Pidgeon, R.E. Kasperson, and P. Slovic, editors,The social amplification of risk, pages 13-46. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003.
S. Ríos-Insua, A. Jiménez, and A. Mateos. Sensitivity analysis in a generic multi-attribute decision support system. In Advances in decision technology and intelligent information systems, vol. IV. K.J. Engemann and G.E. Lasker, The International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systems Research and Cybernetics, 2003.
A. Verkeyn, D. Botteldooren, D. De Baets, and G. de Tre. Sugeno Integrals for the Modelling of Noise Annoyance Aggregation. In T. Bilgic and et al, editors,IFSA 2003, volume 2715 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, pages 277--284. Springer Verlag, Berlin, 2003.
M. Abido. A novel multiobjective evolutionary algorithm for environmental/economic power dispatch. Electric Power Systems Research, 65(1):71-81, 2003.
J.C.J.H. Aerts, E. Eisinger, G.B.M. Heuvelink, and T. Stewart. Using linear integer programming for multi site land use allocation. Geographical Analysis, 35:148--169, 2003.
J. Aguarón, M. T. Escobar, and J. M. Moreno-Jiménez. Consistency stability intervals for a judgement in AHP Decision Support Systems. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(2):382-393, 2003.
A. Allahverdi. The two- and m-machine flowshop scheduling problems with bicriteria of makespan and mean flowtime. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(2):373-396, 2003.
T. Aouam, S. I. Chang, and E. S. Lee. Fuzzy MADM: An outranking method. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(2):317-328, 2003.
R. Azibi and D. Vanderpooten. Aggregation of dispersed consequences for constructing criteria: the evaluation of flood risk reduction strategies. European Journal of Operational Research, 144:397--411, 2003.
P.K. Bergey, C.T. Ragsdale, and M. Hoskote. A Decision Support System for the Electrical Power Districting Problem. Decision Support Systems, 36:1-17, 2003.
D. Bollinger and J. Pictet. Potential use of e-democracy in MCDA processes. Analysis on the basis of a Swiss case. Journal of Multi-criteria decision analysis, 12:65-76, 2003.
A.R. Borges and C. Henggeler Antunes. A fuzzy multiple objective decision support model for energy-economy planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(2):304-316, 2003.
A.R. Borges and C. Henggeler Antunes. A weight space-based approach to fuzzy multiple-objective linear programming. Decision Support Systems, 34(4):427-443, 2003.
D. Bouyssou. La crise de la recherche opérationnelle: 25 ans après. Mathématiques et Sciences Humaines, to appear, 2003.
K. Bowen. Sixty years of operational research. European Journal of Operational Research, to appear, 2003.
W.K. Brauers. Indicators to measure Sustainable Development with a special Application for Tanzania. Environmental Research, Engineering and Management, 26(4):27-31, 2003.
W.K. Brauers and N. Lepkova. The application of the nominal group technique to the business outlook of the facilities sector of Lithuania over the period 2003-2012. International Journal of Strategic Property Management, 7(1):1-9, 2003.
C.M. Campos and J.A. Moreno. Relaxation of the Condorcet and Simpson Conditions in Voting Location. European Journal of Operational Research, 145:673-683, 2003.
E. Centeno, B. Vitoriano, A. Campos, A. Muñoz, J. Villar, and E. Sánchez. A goal programming model for rescheduling of generation power in deregulated markets. Annals of Operations Research, 120:45-57, 2003.
I. Charon and O. Hudry. Links between the Slater index and the Ryser index of tournaments. Graphs and Combinatorics, 19(3):309-322, 2003.
J. Chomicki. Preference formulas in relations queries. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 28:1-39, 2003.
T. Chung, K. Li, G. Chen, J. Xie, and G. Tang. Multiobjective transmission network planning by a hybrid GA approach with fuzzy decision analysis. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 25(3):173-258, 2003.
J. Clìmaco, J. Craveirinha, and M. Pascoal. A bicriterion approach for routing problems in multimedia networks. Networks, 41(4):206-220, 2003.
J.K. Cochran, S.M. Horng, and J.W. Fowler. A multi-population genetic algorithm to solve multi-objective scheduling problems for parallel machines. Computers and Operations Research, 30(8):1087-1102, 2003.
J.P. Costa, P. Melo, P. Godinho, and L.C. Dias. The AGAP System: A GDSS for Project Analysis and Evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 145:287-303, 2003.
J.P. Costa, P. Melo, P. Godinho, and L.C. Dias. The AGAP system: A GDSS for project analysis and evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(2):287-303, 2003.
P. Cowling. A Flexible Decision Support System for Steel Hot Rolling Mill Scheduling. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 45:307-321, 2003.
Note: Special issue edited by the Institute of Telecommunications, Warsaw.
P. Delquié. Optimal conflict in preference assessment. Management Science, 49(1):102-115, 2003.
Abstract: This paper presents IRIS (Interactive Robustness analysis and parameters' Inference for multicriteria Sorting problems), a Decision Support System (DSS) designed to sort actions (projects, candidates, alternatives, clients, ...) described by their performance on multiple criteria into an ordered set of categories defined a priori. It is based on the ELECTRE TRI sorting method, but does not require the Decision Maker (DM) to indicate precise values for all of the method's parameters. More realistically, the software expects the DM to indicate some constraints these parameters should respect, including sorting examples that the program should reproduce. If the constraints indicated by the DM do not contradict each other (i.e. form a consistent system), then IRIS infers a combination of parameter values that reproduces all the sorting examples, indicating also the range of possible assignments of actions to categories that would be possible without violating any of the stated constraints. If the constraints are contradictory (i.e. form an inconsistent system), then IRIS suggests a combination of parameter values that minimizes an error function and identifies alternative ways to restore the system's consistency by removing some constraints.
Ian Durbach and T. Stewart. Integrating Scenario Planning and Goal Programming. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12:261--271, 2003.
M. Ehrgott and A.J.V. Skriver. Solving biobjective combinatorial max-ordering problems by ranking methods and a two-phases approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(3):657-664, 2003.
J.M. Espelta, J. Retana, and A. Habrouk. An economic and ecological multi-criteria evaluation of reforestation methods to recover burned Pinus Negra forests in NE Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 180:185-198, 2003.
E. Fernández and J. Puerto. Multiobjective solution of the uncapacitated plant location problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(3):509-529, 2003.
F. Forgó and F. Szidarovszky. On the relation between the Nash bargaining solution and the weighting method. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1):108-116, 2003.
E.M. Furems, O.I Larichev, G.V. Roizenson, A.V. Lotov, and K. Miettinen. Human Behavior in a Multi-Criteria Choice Problem with Individual Tasks of Different Difficulties. International Journal on Information Technology and Decision Making, 2(1):29-40, 2003.
Z. Gao and L. Tang. A multi-objective model for purchasing of bulk raw materials of a large-scale integrated steel plant. International Journal of Production Economics, 83(3):325-334, 2003.
S.I. Gass and P.G. Roy. The compromise hypersphere for multiobjective linear programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(3):459-479, 2003.
E. Georgopoulou, Y. Sarafidis, S. Mirasgedis, S. Zaimi, and D.P. Lalas. A multiple criteria decision-aid approach in defining national priorities for greenhouse gases emissions reduction in the energy sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(1):199-215, 2003.
I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler. Inductive Inference: An Axiomatic Approach. Econometrica, 71:1-26, 2003.
I. Gilboa and D. Schmeidler. Expected Utility in the Context of a Game. Games and Economic Behavior, 44:184-194, 2003.
E. Grigoroudis and Y. Siskos. A survey of customer satisfaction barometers: Results from the transportation-communications sector. European Journal of Operational Research, 152(2):334--353, 2003.
A. Guerraggio and D.T. Luc. Optimality conditions for C1,1 constrained multiobjective problems. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 116(1):117-129, 2003.
A. Halldórsson and J. Aastrup. Quality criteria for qualitative inquiries in logistics. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(2):321-332, 2003.
R.P. Hamalainen, K. Miettinen, P. Tarvainen, and J. Toivanen. Interactive solution approach to a multiobjective optimization problem in a paper machine headbox design. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 116(2):265-281, 2003.
D.A. Haralambopoulos and H. Polatidis. Renewable energy projects: Structuring a multi-criteria group decision-making framework. Renewable Energy, 28(6):961-973, 2003.
C. Harries. Correspondence to what? Coherence to what? What is good scenario-based decision making. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 70:797--817, 2003.
B. Jiménez. Strict minimality conditions in nondifferentiable multiobjective programming. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 116(1):99-116, 2003.
J.M. Jorge. Maximal descriptor set characterizations of efficient faces in multiple objective linear programming. Operations Research Letters, 31(2):124-128, 2003.
A. Joubert, T. Stewart, and R. Eberhard. Evaluation of water supply augmentation and water demand management options for the City of Cape Town. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12:17--25, 2003.
D. Kahneman. A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58:697-720, 2003.
M. Kaleta, W. Ogryczak, E. Toczylowski, and I. Zoltowska. On multiple criteria decision support for suppliers on the competitive electric power market. Annals of Operations Research, 121:79-104, 2003.
I. Kaliszewski. Dynamic parametric bounds on efficient outcomes in interactive multiple criteria decision making problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1):94-107, 2003.
I. Kaliszewski. Weight versus reference point multiple criteria decision making methods - analogies and differencies. Journal of Telecommunication and Information Technologies, (3):9--15, 2003.
J. Kangas, J. Hokkanen, A. Kangas, R. Lahdelma, and P. Salminen. Applying stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis to forest ecosystem management with both cardinal and ordinal criteria. Forest Science, 49(6):928-937, 2003.
E.E. Karsak, S. Sozer, and S.E. Alptekin. Product planning in quality function deployment using a combined analytic network process and goal programming approach. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 44(1):171-190, 2003.
M. Koksalan and R.D. Plante. Interactive Multi-Criteria Optimization for Multiple Response Product and Process Design. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 5(4):334-347, 2003.
M. Koksalan and S. Salman. Beer in the Classroom: A Case Study of Location and Distribution Decisions. INFORMS Transactions on Education, September 2003.
H. Kubotani and K. Yoshimura. Performance evaluation of acceptance probability functions for multi-objective AS. Computers and Operations Research, 30(3):427-442, 2003.
Momcilo Kujacic and Nebojsa Bojovic. Organizational Design of Post Corporation Structure Using Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision Making. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 9(1):5-18, May 2003.
V. Köbberling and P.P. Wakker. Preference Foundations for Nonexpected Utility: A Generalized and Simplified Technique. Mathematics of Operations Research, 28:395–423, 2003.
V. Köbberling. Comment on: Edi Karni & Zvi Safra (1998) The hexagon condition and additive representation for two dimensions: An algebraic approach. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47(3):370, 2003.
K.H. Küfer, A. Scherrer, M. Monz, F. Alonso, H. Trinkaus, T. Bortfeld, and C. Thieke. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy -- A large scale multi-criteria programming problem. OR Spektrum, 25(2):223-249, 2003.
C. Labreuche and M. Grabisch. The Choquet integral for the aggregation of interval scales in multicriteria decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 137(1):11-26, July 2003.
R. Lahdelma, K. Miettinen, and P. Salminen. Ordinal criteria in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1):117-127, 2003.
R. Lahdelma, P. Salminen, and M. Kuula. Testing the efficiency of two pairwise comparison methods in discrete multiple criteria problems. European Journal on Operational Research, 145(3):496-508, 2003.
P. Lenca, P. Meyer, P. Picouet, and B. Vaillant. Aide multicritère à la décision pour évaluer les indices de qualité des connaissances. RSTI-RIA, Revue des Sciences et Technologies de l'Information, 17/2003:271-282, 2003.
P. Leskinen, J. Kangas, and A.M. Pasanen. Assessing ecological values with dependent explanatory variables in multi-criteria forest ecosystem management. Ecological Modelling, 170:1-12, 2003.
J.C. Leyva-Lopez and E. Fernandez-Gonzalez. A new method for group decision support based on ELECTRE III methodology. European Journal of Operational Research, 148(1):14-27, 2003.
Y. Li, G.M. Fadel, and M.M. Wiecek. Minimum effort approximation of the Pareto space of convex bi-criteria problems. Optimization and Engineering, 4:231-261, 2003.
Shao-Yuan Li and Yi-Peng Yang. On-Line Constrained Predictive Control Algorithm using Multi-Objective Fuzzy-Optimization and a Case Study. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2(2):123-142, June 2003.
A.V. Lotov. Internet Tools for Supporting Lay Stakeholders in the Framework of the Democratic Paradigm of Environmental Decision Making. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12:145-162, 2003.
S. Makkonen, R. Lahdelma, A.-M. Asell, and A. Jokinen. Multi-criteria decision support in the liberated energy market. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 12(1):27-42, 2003.
C.K. Makropoulos, D. Butler, and C. Maksimovic. Fuzzy logic spatial decision support system for urban water management. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, (January/February):69-77, 2003.
L. Mandow and J.L. Pérez de la Cruz. Multicriteria Heuristic Search. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(2):253-280, 2003.
D. Manjure and E. Makram. Optimal load curtailment as a bi-criteria program. Electric Power Systems Research, 66(2):155-161, 2003.
Th. Marchant. Towards a theory of MCDM: stepping away from social choice theory. Mathematical Social Sciences, 45:343-363, 2003.
J.R. Marsden and S. Mathiyalakan. An investigation of changes in attitude over time of GDSS groups under unanimity and majority decision rules. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(3):693-712, 2003.
N.F. Matsatsinis, P. Moraitis, V. Psomatakis, and N. Spanoudakis. An agent-based system for products penetration strategy selection. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 17(10):901-925, 2003.
G. Mavrotas, D. Diakoulaki, and P. Capros. Combined MCDA-IP Approach for Project Selection in the Electricity Market. Annals of Operations Research, 120:159-170, 2003.
G.G. Merino, D.D. Jones, D.L. Clements, and D. Miller. Fuzzy compromise programming with precedence order in the criteria. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 134:185-205, 2003.
K. Miettinen, A.V. Lotov, G. Kamenev, and V. Berezkin. Integration of Two Multi-objective Optimization Methods for Nonlinear Problems. Optimization Methods and Software, 18(1):63-80, 2003.
Kaisa Miettinen and Marko M. Mäkelä. Characterizing Generalized Trade-Off Directions. Mathematical Method of Operations Research, 57:89--100, 2003.
J. Mingers. A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54:559-570, 2003.
S. Mirrazavi, D.F. Jones, and M. Tamiz. MultiGen: An Integrated Multiple-Objective Solution System. Decision Support Systems, 36(177-187), 2003.
M. Morisio, I. Stamelos, and A. Tsoukiàs. Software Product And Process Assessment Through Profile-Based Evaluation. International Journal of Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering, 13:495-512, 2003.
Abstract: "We consider a framework where Decision Makers (DMs) interactively define a multicriteria evaluation model by providing imprecise information (i.e., a linear system of constraints to the model's parameters) and by analyzing the consequences of the information provided. DMs may introduce new constraints explicitly or implicitly (results that the model should yield). If a new constraint is incompatible with the previous ones, then the system becomes inconsistent and the DMs must choose between removing the new constraint or removing some of the older ones. We address the problem of identifying subsets of constraints which, when removed, lead to a consistent system. Identifying such subsets would indicate the reason for the inconsistent information given by DMs. There may exist several possibilities for the DMs to resolve the inconsistency. We present two algorithms to identify such possibilities, one using 0-1 programming and the other one using linear programming. Both approaches are based on the knowledge that the system was consistent prior to introducing the last constraint. The output of these algorithms helps the DM to identify the conflicting pieces of information in a set of statements he/she asserted. The relevance of these algorithms for MCDA is illustrated by an application to an aggregation/disaggregation procedure for the Electre Tri method."
abstract="We consider a framework where Decision Makers (DMs) interactively define a multicriteria evaluation model by providing imprecise information (i.e., a linear system of constraints to the model's parameters) and by analyzing the consequences of the information provided. DMs may introduce new constraints explicitly or implicitly (results that the model should yield). If a new constraint is incompatible with the previous ones, then the system becomes inconsistent and the DMs must choose between removing the new constraint or removing some of the older ones. We address the problem of identifying subsets of constraints which, when removed, lead to a consistent system. Identifying such subsets would indicate the reason for the inconsistent information given by DMs. There may exist several possibilities for the DMs to resolve the inconsistency. We present two algorithms to identify such possibilities, one using 0-1 programming and the other one using linear programming. Both approaches are based on the knowledge that the system was consistent prior to introducing the last constraint. The output of these algorithms helps the DM to identify the conflicting pieces of information in a set of statements he/she asserted. The relevance of these algorithms for MCDA is illustrated by an application to an aggregation/disaggregation procedure for the Electre Tri method."
A. Ngo The and A. Tsoukiàs. Numerical representation of PQI interval orders. Discrete Applied Mathematics, To appear, 2003.
T. Niimura and T. Nakashima. Multiobjective tradeoff analysis of deregulated electricity transactions. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 25(3):179-185, 2003.
W. Ogryczak and T. Sliwinski. On Solving Linear Programs with the Ordered Weighted Averaging Objective. European Journal of Operational Research, 148:80-91, 2003.
B.B. Pal and B.N. Moitra. A goal programming procedure for solving problems with multiple fuzzy goals using dynamic programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(3):480-491, 2003.
S. Pamuk and M. Koksalan. An Interactive Evolutionary Metaheuristic for Multiobjective Combinatorial Optimization. Management Science, 49(12):1726-1738, 2003.
M. Resende and C. Ribeiro. A GRASP with path-relinking for private virtual circuit routing. Networks, 41(3):104-114, 2003.
S. Ríos-Insua, A. Mateos, and A. Jiménez. Solving multi-attribute problems under risk based on an approximation. Revue d'Analyse Numérique et de Théorie de L'Approximation, 32(2):209-222, 2003.
T.L. Saaty and M.S. Ozdemir. Negative Priorities in the Analytic Hierarchy process. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 37:1063-1075, 2003.
T. L. Saaty. Decision-making with the AHP: Why is the principal eigenvector necessary. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1):85-91, 2003.
T.L. Saaty and M.S. Ozdemir. Why the Magic Number Seven Plus or Minus two. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 38:233-244, 2003.
M. Sakawa, K. Kato, and I. Nishizaki. An interactive fuzzy satisficing method for multiobjective stochastic linear programming problems through an expectation model. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(3):665-672, 2003.
S. Sayin. A Procedure to Find Discrete Representations of the Efficient Set with Specified Coverage Errors. Operations Research, 51:427-436, 2003.
P. Singh and P. K. Saxena. The multiple objective time transportation problem with additional restrictions. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(3):460-476, 2003.
A.J.V. Skriver and K.A. Andersen. The bicriterion semi-obnoxious location (BSL) problem solved by an e-approximation. European Journal of Operational Research, 146(3):517-528, 2003.
A. Stam and A.P.D. Silva. On muliplicative priority rating methods for the AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1):92-108, 2003.
I. Stamelos and A. Tsoukiàs. Software Evaluation Problem Situations. European Journal of Operational Research, 145:273-286, 2003.
I. M. Stancu-Minasian and B. Pop. On a fuzzy set approach to solving multiple objective linear fractional programming problem. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 134(3):397-405, 2003.
R.E. Steuer and P. Na. Multiple Criteria Decision Making Combined with Finance: A Categorized Bibliography. European Journal of Operational Research, 150(3):496-515, 2003.
T. Stewart and F.B. Losa. Towards reconciling outranking and value measurement practice. European Journal of Operational Research, 145:645--659, 2003.
S.K. Suneja, C.S. Lalitha, and S. Khurana. Second order symmetric duality in multiobjective programming. European Journal of Operational Research, 144(3):492-500, 2003.
Jari Toivanen, Jari Hämäläinen, Kaisa Miettinen, and Pasi Tarvainen. Designing Paper Machine Headbox Using GA. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 18:533--541, 2003.
M Tsay. Applying the multiobjective approach for operation strategy of cogeneration systems under environmental constraints. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 25(3):219-226, 2003.
W. Ulrich. Beyond methodology choice: critical systems thinking as critically systemic discource. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54:325-342, 2003.
O. Uran and R. Janssen. Why are spatial decision support systems not used? Some experiences from the Netherlands. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 27:Article in Press, 2003.
S. Xu, L.D. Xu, and X. Chen. Determining optimum edible films for kiwifruits using an analytical hierarchy process. Computers and Operations Research, 30(6):877-886, 2003.
T. Yang and C. Kuo. A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1):128-136, 2003.
C.H. Yeh. The selection of multiattribute decision making methods for scholarship student selection. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 11(4):289-296, December 2003.
C.H. Yeh and Y.L. Kuo. Validating fuzzy multicriteria analysis using fuzzy clustering. International Journal of Operations and Quantitative Management, 9(3):161-175, September 2003.
E. Zitzler, L. Thiele, M. Laumanns, C. M. Foneseca, and V. Grunert da Fonseca. Performance Assessment of Multiobjective Optimizers: An Analysis and Review. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 7(2):117--132, 2003.
M.A. Aloulou, M.Y. Kovalyov, and M.C. Portmann. Worst case performance evaluation of flexible solutions in single machine scheduling. In Proceedings of Computing Engineering in Systems Applications -- CESA'2003, Lille, pages in CD-ROM, 2003.
M.A. Aloulou and M.C. Portmann. An efficient proactive-reactive scheduling approach to hedge against shop floor disturbances. In Proceedings of MISTA'2003, volume 1, Nottingham, pages 337--362, August 2003.
Note: To appear in the special issue of MISTA edited by Kluwer.
Note: LNCS 2906, December 15-17, Kyoto, Japan.
M. Ehrgott and X. Gandibleux. Multiple Objective Combinatorial Optimization -- A Tutorial. In T. Tanino, T. Tanaka, and M. Inuiguchi, editors, Multi-Objective Programming and Goal-Programming, pages 3-18, 2003. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
S.C. Erbas and C. Erbas. A Multiobjective Off-line Routing Model for MPLS Networks. In J. Charzinski, R. Lehnert, and P. Tran-Gia, editors, Proceedings of the 18th International Teletraffic Congress -- ITC 18, Berlin, pages 471-480, 2003. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
S.C. Erbas. Utilizing Evolutionary Algorithms for Multiobjective Problems in Traffic Engineering. In W. Ben-Amur and A. Petrowski, editors, Proceedings of the International Networks Optimisation Conference INOC 2003, Evry, October 2003, pages 207-212, 2003. Institut National des Telecommunications, Evry, France.
S. Greco, B. Matarazzo, and R. Slowinski. The axiomatic basis of Sugeno integral and associative aggregation operator. In 4th International Workshop on Preferences and Decisions, Trento, Italy, pages 33-38, September 2003.
E. Grigoroudis and Y. Siskos. MUSA: A decision support system for evaluating and analysing customer satisfaction. In K. Margaritis and I. Pitas, editors, Proceedings of the 9th Panhellenic Conference in Informatics, Thessaloniki, Greece, pages 113--127, 2003.
B.J. Hunt and M.M. Wiecek. Cones to aid decision making in multicriteria programming. In T. Tanino, T. Tanaka, and M. Inuiguchi, editors, Multi-Objective Programming and Goal Programming, pages 153-158, 2003. Springer Verlag, Berlin.
A. Jiménez, S. Ríos-Insua, and A. Mateos. Monte-Carlo simulation techniques in a multi-attribute decision support system. In M. H. Hamza, editor, Proceedings of the 12th IASTED International Conference on Applied Simulation and Modelling, pages 85-90, September 2003. ACTA Press.
A.C. Kakas and P. Moraï tis. Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In Proceedings of AAMAS03, pages 883-890, 2003. ACM Press, New York.
Ch. Labreuche and M. Grabisch. Bi-cooperative games and their importance and interaction indices. In R. Bisdorff, editor, 14th Mini-EURO Conference on Human Centered Processes (HCP'2003), Luxembourg, pages 287-291, May 2003.
F. Le Huédé, M. Grabisch, C. Labreuche, and P. Savéant. Multicriteria search in constraint programming. In Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Integration of AI and OR techniques in Constraint Programming for Combinatorial Optimisation Problems, Montreal, Canada, 2003.
F. Le Huédé, M. Grabisch, C. Labreuche, and P. Savéant. Guidage d'une recherche multicritère en programmation par contraintes. In Actes des 5e journées de l'association française de Recherche Opérationnelle et d'Aide à la Décision, Avignon, France, 2003.
N.F. Matsatsinis and P. Delias. AgentAllocator: An Agent-Based Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Task Allocation. In V. Marik, D. McFarlane, and P. Valckenaers, editors, Holonic and Multi-Agent Systems for Manufacturing, volume 2744 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 225-235, 2003. Springer Verlag.
Kaisa Miettinen. Graphical Illustration of Pareto Optimal Solutions. In T. Tanino, T. Tanaka, and M. Inuiguchi, editors, Multi-Objective Programming and Goal Programming: Theory and Applications, Berlin, Heidelberg, pages 197--202, 2003. Springer-Verlag.
P. Miranda and M. Grabisch. p-symmetric bi-capacities. In International Summer School on Aggregation Operators and their Applications, Alcala, Spain, pages 123-129, July 2003.
M. Papadrakakis, N.D. Lagaros, and V. Sevastyanov. A New Visualization Method of Multidimensional Numerical Models for Structural Optimization. In K.J. Bathe, editor, Proceedings of Second MIT Conference on Computational Fluid and Solid Mechanics, 2003. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
P. Perny and O. Spanjaard. An Axiomatic Approach to Robustness in Search Problems with Multiple Scenarios. In Proceedings of the 19th conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Acapulco, Mexico, pages 469-476, 2003.
A. Rolland. Apport d'un point de référence pour l'agrégation de préférence. In In actes de Ecole d'Automne de Recherche Opérationnelle, 2003.
J. P. Santos, J. F. Oliveira, M. A. Carravilla, and C. Costa. A Decision Support System for the Assessment of Higher Education Degrees in Portugal. In European Sociaty for Engineering Education, SEFI2003 -- Global Engineer: Education and Training for Mobility, Porto, Portugal, September 2003.
A. O. Kazakci and A. Tsoukiàs. Designing or Planning? - Cognitive foundations for design aiding. Cahier du Lamsade No 214, Université Paris Dauphine, 2003.
M. Laumanns, L. Thiele, and E. Zitzler. Running Time Analysis of Evolutionary Algorithms on Vector-Valued Pseudo-Boolean Functions. Technical report 165, Computer Engineering and Networks Laboratory, ETH Zurich, May 2003.
Abstract: "We consider the Multiple Criteria Sorting Problem, that aims at assigning each alternative in a finite set $A$ to one of the predefined categories. We propose a new concept of category size that refers to the proportion by which an evaluation vector corresponding to a realistic alternative is assigned to the category. Sorting problems usually refer to absolute evaluation (the assignment of an alternative does not depend on the others), as opposed to ranking and choice problems in which the very purpose is to compare alternatives against each other. Considering constraints concerning category size lead to define a Constrained Sorting Problem which refers both to absolute and relative evaluation. After identifying decision situations in which category size is useful for modelling purposes, this paper defines the concept of category size and proposes a way to compute the size of categories, even when the set of alternatives and/or the preference information is/are imprecisely known. We show how this notion can be used in a preference elicitation process. Finally, in order to illustrate the use of this concept, we propose a procedure to infer the values for preference parameters that accounts for specifications (provided by the DM) about the size of categories, in the context of the UTADIS sorting model."
abstract="We consider the Multiple Criteria Sorting Problem, that aims at assigning each alternative in a finite set $A$ to one of the predefined categories. We propose a new concept of category size that refers to the proportion by which an evaluation vector corresponding to a realistic alternative is assigned to the category. Sorting problems usually refer to absolute evaluation (the assignment of an alternative does not depend on the others), as opposed to ranking and choice problems in which the very purpose is to compare alternatives against each other. Considering constraints concerning category size lead to define a Constrained Sorting Problem which refers both to absolute and relative evaluation. After identifying decision situations in which category size is useful for modelling purposes, this paper defines the concept of category size and proposes a way to compute the size of categories, even when the set of alternatives and/or the preference information is/are imprecisely known. We show how this notion can be used in a preference elicitation process. Finally, in order to illustrate the use of this concept, we propose a procedure to infer the values for preference parameters that accounts for specifications (provided by the DM) about the size of categories, in the context of the UTADIS sorting model."
J. Nurminen. Models and Algorithms for Network Planning Tool -- Pratical Experiences. Technical report E14, Helsinki University of Technology, 2003.
OECD. Composite indicators of country performance: A critical assessment. DST/IND(2003)5, OECD, Paris, 2003.
Note: To appear in a volume edited by M. Ehrgott, J. Figuiera and X. Gandibleux.
S. Ruzika and M.M. Wiecek. A survey of approximation methods in multiobjective programming. Technical report 90, Department of Mathematics, University of Kaiserslautern, 2003.
Note: To appear with the European Journal of Operational Research.
A. Tsoukiàs. On the concept of decision aiding process. Technical report 2003-38, DIMACS, Rutgers University, 2003.
R. E. Steuer. ADBASE: A Multiple Objective Linear Programming Solver for All Efficient Extreme Points and All Unbounded Efficient Edges. Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, 2003.
R. E. Steuer and C. Piercy. A regression model for the number of efficient extreme points in multiple objective linear programming. Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, 2003.
R. E. Steuer and Y. Qi. Efficient frontier sensitivity and the case for multiple objectives in portfolio optimization. Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, Athens, 2003.
Note: Bulletin of the EURO Working Group on MCDA, Fall 2003, Available on line at http://www.inescc.pt/$\sim$ewgmcda.
Note: Presented at EUMAS-03 Workshop, Available on line at http://www.lamsade.dauphine.fr/$\sim$tsoukias/recent.html.

References: V. 

V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.