Source: http://www.nexos.ufsc.br/index.php/peri/article/view/3058
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 06:33:38+00:00

Document:
What makes representative constructivism democratic?
This article connects J. S. Mill’s democratic theory and practice with the contemporary debate surrounding representative constructivism and argues that Mill’s advocacy of female suffrage affords an empirical example of the mobilization power of representative constructivism. Studying this concrete example of constructivism alongside Mill’s theory of political representation clarifies that constructivism is democratic to the extent it seeks to make citizens themselves appropriate and contest the claims that their representatives construct on their behalf.
ALKMIM, Antonio Carlos.O paradoxo do conceito de representação política. Teoria & Pesquisa, v. 22, n. 1, pp. 56-71, 2013. DOI: 10.4322/tp.2013.010.
ALMEIDA, Debora C. Rezende. A virada construtivista e seu (des)compromisso com o registro normativo da representação.Anais do III Encontro Internacional Participação, Democracia e Políticas Públicas, pp. 1-20, Vitória, 2017.
ALMEIDA, Debora C. Rezende. A virada construtivista e o paradoxo entre criação e autonomia. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, v.33, n. 97, e339705, 2018. DOI: 10.1590/339705/2018.
ANKERSMIT, Franklin Rudolf.Aesthetic Politics: Political Philosophy beyond Fact and Value. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1996.
ARDITI, Benjamín. The people as re-presentation and event. In: TORRE, Carlos de la.The Promise and Perils of Populism. Lexington, KY: Kentucky University Press, 2015.
ARENDT, Hannah.The Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1973.
AUDARD, Catherine.Qu’est-ce que le libéralisme ? Éthique, politique, société. Paris: Gallimard, 2009.
BAUM, Bruce. Rereading Power and Freedom in J. S. Mill. Toronto: Toronto University Press,2000.
BRODRICK,George Charles.Political Studies. London: C. K. Paul & Company,1879.
BURROW, John Wyon. Whigs and Liberals: Continuity and Change in English Political Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1988.
COLLINI, Stefan. Introduction. In:The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, vol. XXI. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1984.
CONTI, Gregory. Democracy confronts diversity: Descriptive representation in Victorian Britain. Political Theory. Epub ahead of print, 2018. DOI: 10.1177/0090591718766479.
CORVAL, Paulo R. Democracia representativa: Revisitando John Stuart Mill. Revista de Informação Legislativa,v. 52, n. 206, pp. 245-270, 2015.
COSTA, Pietro. Poucos, muitos, todos: Lições de história da democracia. Translated by L. E. Fritoli. Curitiba: Ed. UFPR, 2012.
DALAQUA, Gustavo Hessmann.Conflict, consensus, and liberty in J. S. Mill’s representative democracy. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, v. 26, n. 1, pp. 110-130, 2018a.DOI: 10.1080/09608788.2017.1370997.
DALAQUA, Gustavo Hessmann. O desenvolvimento do Eu: Ética, política e justiça em John Stuart Mill. Curitiba: Ed. UFPR, 2018b.
DALAQUA, Gustavo Hessmann. Representation, epistemic democracy, and political parties in John Stuart Mill and José de Alencar.Brazilian Political Science Review, v. 12, n. 2, e0004, 2018c. DOI: 10.1590/1981-3821201800020004.
DALAQUA, Gustavo Hessmann. Democracy as compromise: An alternative to the agonistic vs. epistemic divide. Kriterion (forthcoming).
DISCH, Lisa.Democratic representation and the constituency paradox. Perspectives on Politics, v. 10, n. 3, pp. 599-616, 2012. DOI: 10.1017/S1537592712001636.
DISCH, Lisa.La représentation politique et les « effets de subjectivation ».Raisons Politiques, v. 56, n. 4, pp. 25-47,2014.DOI: 10.3917/rai.056.0025.
DISCH, Lisa.The‘constructivist turn’ in democratic representation: A normative dead-end?Constellations, v.22, n. 4, pp. 487-499, 2015.DOI: 10.1111/1467-8675.12201.
DISCH, Lisa.Beyond congruence. In BÜHLMANN, Marc and FIVAZ, Jav. Political Representation: Roles, Representatives and the Represented. London: Routledge, 2016. DOI: 10.4324/9781315665788-13.
DISCH, Lisa.Toward a mobilization conception of democratic representation. In: VIEIRA, Mónica Brito. Reclaiming Representation: Contemporary Advances in the Theory of Political Representation. London: Routledge, 2017. DOI: 10.4324/9781315681696-6.
ESPEJO, Paulina Ochoa. Populism and the idea of the people. In: ROVIRA KALTWASSER, Cristóbal et al. The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198803560.013.30.
GEENENS, Raf et al.Theco-originality of constituent power and representation. Constellations, v. 22, n. 4, pp.514-522, 2015. DOI:10.1111/1467-8675.12200.
GOYARD-FABRE, Simone.O que é democracia?Translated by C. Berliner. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
GRIFFIN, Ben.The Politics of Gender in Victorian England: Masculinity, Political Culture and the Struggle for Women’s Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139057530.
HALL, Stuart.Thework of representation. In: HALL, Stuart.Representation: Cultural Representations and Signifying Practices. London: Sage Publications,1997.
HAYAT, Samuel.La représentation inclusive. Raisons Politiques, v. 50, n. 2, pp. 115-135, 2013. DOI: 10.3917/rai.050.0115.
KELSEN, Hans.VomWesen und Wert der Demokratie. Tübingen: Scientia Verlag, 1929.
KINZER, Bruce.J. S. Mill Revisited. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. DOI: 10.1057/9780230607095.
KUMAR, Sujith. Mill: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Bloomsbury Academic,2013.
LACLAU, Ernesto.Emancipation(s). London: Verso, 1996.
LACLAU, Ernesto.On Populist Reason. London: Verso, 2005.
LE JEUNE, Françoise.John Stuart Mill, un féministe sous influence. In:MONACELLI, Martine and PRUM, Michel.Ces hommes qui épousèrent la cause des femmes: Dix pionniers britanniques.Paris: Editions de l’Atelier, 2010.
LEMINSKI, Paulo.Ensaios e anseios críticos. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp, 2011.
LEYENAAR, Monique and OLDERSMA, Jantine.Introduction: Representation and inclusion. Representation, v. 43, n. 2, pp. 65-71, 2007.
MANSBRIDGE, Jane.Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent ‘yes’.The Journal of Politics, v. 61, n. 3, pp. 628-657, 1999.DOI: 10.2307/2647821.
MERQUIOR, José Guilherme. O liberalismo antigo e moderno. São Paulo: É Realizações, 2014.
MIGUEL, Luis Felipe.Democracia e representação: Territórios em disputa. São Paulo: Editora Unesp, 2014.
MILL, John Stuart.The Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, 33 vols. Toronto: University of Toronto Press; London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1963-1991.
MUIRHEAD, Russell.The Promise of Party in a Polarized Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press,2014.
PITKIN, Hanna Fenichel.The Concept of Representation. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1967.
POPPA, Bogdan.Shame: A Genealogy of Queer Practices. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 2017.
RILEY, Jonathan. Mill’s neo-Athenian model of liberal democracy. In: URBINATI, Nadia and ZAKARAS, Alex.J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618734.010.
ROSANVALLON, Pierre. Le peuple introuvable: Histoire de la représentation démocratique en France.Paris: Gallimard, 1998.
ROSENBLUM, Nancy.On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship.Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2008.
SACCOMANI, Edda.Fascismo. In: BOBBIO, Norberto; MATTEUCCI, Nicola Matteucci; PASQUINO, Gianfranco. Dicionário de política. Translatedby C. Varrialeet al. Brasília: Editora Universidade de Brasília, 2010.
SAWARD, Michael. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press,2010. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579389.001.0001.
SELINGER, William.Philosophers in Parliament: The Crises of Eighteenth-Century Constitutionalism and the Nineteenth-Century Liberal Parliamentary Tradition. PhD thesis, Harvard University, 2015.
SMITS, Katherine. John Stuart Mill and the social construction of identity. History of Political Thought, v. 25, n. 2, pp. 298-324, 2004.
STANTON, Theodore. The Woman Question in Europe: A Series of Original Essays. London: G. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1884.
THOMPSON, Dennis.Mill in Parliament: When should a philosopher compromise? In: URBINATI, Nadia and ZAKARAS, Alex.J. S. Mill’s Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2007. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511618734.008.
TOMBA, Massimiliano. Who’s afraid of the imperative mandate? Critical Times, v.1, n. 1, pp. 108-119, 2018.
URBINATI, Nadia.Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2002.
URBINATI, Nadia.Representative Democracy: Principles & Genealogy. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2006.
VIEIRA, Mónica Brito. Introduction. In: VIEIRA, Mónica Brito.Reclaiming Representation:Contemporary Advances in the Theory of Political Representation. London: Routledge, 2017. DOI: 10.4324/9781315681696-1.
VINX, Lars. Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199227952.001.0001.
WINKLER, Michael. Bildung and freedom. In: SCHNEIDER, Käthe. Becoming Oneself: Dimensions of Bildung, and the Facilitation of Personality Development. Heildelberg: Springer, 2012.
YOUNG, Iris Marion.Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.DOI: 10.1093/0198297556.001.0001.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.