Source: https://tiipm.nccu.edu.tw/zh_tw/News/news6/%E5%BE%9EPar-Pharmaceutical-Inc-v-TWi-Pharmaceuticals-Inc-%E6%8E%A2%E8%A8%8E%E8%97%A5%E7%89%A9%E6%96%B0%E8%A3%BD%E5%8A%91%E5%B0%88%E5%88%A9%E4%B9%8B%E9%80%B2%E6%AD%A5%E6%80%A7-61954253
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 10:31:57+00:00

Document:
Kevin E. Noonan, Par Pharmaceutical, Inc. v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2014), Patent Docs, Dec. 3, 2014 http://www.patentdocs.org/2014/12/par-pharmaceutical-inc-v-twi-pharmaceuticals-inc-fed-cir-2014.html (last visit: 2016/11/25).
(iv) that such patent is invalid or will not be infringed by the manufacture, use, or sale of the new drug for which the application is submitted.
 Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. CIV. CCB-11-2466, 2014 WL 694976 (D. Md. Feb. 21, 2014), vacated and remanded, 773 F. 3d 1186 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
 Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 773 F. 3d 1186, 12-25 (Fed. Cir. 2014).
 Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 120 F. Supp. 3d 468, 473 (D. Md. 2015).
 Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 624 Fed. Appx. 756 (Fed. Cir. 2015).
 Par Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. TWi Pharmaceuticals, Inc., No. CCB-11-2466, 2016 WL 5820211 (D. Md. Oct. 4, 2016).
 35 U.S. Code § 103. A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 103