Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=33958/96
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 13:06:39+00:00

Document:
Entscheidend ist, ob diese Befürchtung als objektiv gerechtfertigt angesehen werden kann (siehe Wettstein./. Schweiz, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 33958/96, Rdnr. 44, ECHR 2000-XII;… und Micallef, a. a. O., Rdnr. 96).
What is decisive is whether this fear can be held to be objectively justified (see Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 44, ECHR 2000-XII, and Micallef, cited above, § 96).
Maßgeblich ist, ob das Gericht insbesondere durch seine Zusammensetzung ausreichende Gewähr dafür bietet, jeden legitimen Zweifel an seiner Unparteilichkeit auszuschließen (vgl. EGMR, Fey v. Austria…, Urteil vom 24. Februar 1993, Nr. 14396/88, Rn. 27 ff.; Pullar v. The United Kingdom…, Urteil vom 10. Juni 1996, Nr. 22399/93, Rn. 30; Morel v. France…, Urteil vom 6. Juni 2000, Nr. 34130/96, Rn. 40 ff.; Wettstein v. Switzerland, Urteil vom 21. Dezember 2000, Nr. 33958/96, Rn. 42; EGMR , Micallef v. Malta…, Urteil vom 15. Oktober 2009, Nr. 17056/06, Rn. 93; EGMR, Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine…, Urteil vom 9. Januar 2013, Nr. 21722/11, Rn. 104).
According to the Court's settled case-law, the existence of impartiality for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 must be determined according to: (i) a subjective test, where regard must be had to the personal conviction and behaviour of a particular judge - that is, whether the judge held any personal prejudice or bias in a given case; and (ii) an objective test, that is to say by ascertaining whether the tribunal itself and, among other aspects, its composition, offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in respect of its impartiality (see, among other authorities, Fey v. Austria, 24 February 1993, §§ 28 and 30, Series A no. 255, and Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 42, ECHR 2000-XII).
It further reiterates that, where it finds that there has been a violation of the Convention, it may award the applicant the costs and expenses incurred before the national courts for the prevention or redress of the violation (see, among other authorities, Zimmermann and Steiner v. Switzerland, judgment of 13 July 1983, Series A no. 66, p. 14, § 36, and Hertel, cited above, p. 2334, § 63), and that it has the task of assessing whether the costs and expenses claimed were actually and necessarily incurred for that purpose and are reasonable as to quantum (see, among other authorities, Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 56, ECHR 2000-XII).
Es kommt darauf an, dass die Befürchtung objektiv gerechtfertigt ist (…siehe Rechtssachen Kyprianou , a. a. O., Nr. 118; Ferrantelli und Santangelo ./. Italien, Urteil vom 7. August 1996, Berichte 1996-III, S. 951-52, Nr. 58, und Wettstein ./. Schweiz , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 33958/96, Nr. 44, CEDH 2000-XII).
Was den Anspruch der Beschwerdeführer in Bezug auf den materiellen Schaden angeht, weist der Gerichtshof darauf hin, dass er keine Mutmaßungen darüber anstellen kann, wie das in Rede stehende Verfahren ausgegangen wäre, wenn es nicht zu der Verletzung von Artikel 6 Abs. 1 der Konvention gekommen wäre (siehe u. a. Schmautzer ./. Österreich…, Urteil vom 23. Oktober 1995, Serie A, Band 328-A, S. 16, Rdnr. 44; Wettstein ./. Schweiz, Individualbeschwerde Nr. 33958/96, Rdnr. 53, ECHR 2000-XII;… Janssen ./. Deutschland , Individualbeschwerde Nr. 23959/94, Rdnr. 56, 20. Dezember 2001).
In proceedings originating in an individual application the Court has to confine itself, as far as possible, to an examination of the concrete case before it (see Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 41, ECHR 2000-XII).
Nor had he at any point during the proceedings represented the applicant's opponent as a lawyer (see, a contrario, Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 47, ECHR 2000-XII, and Meznaric v. Croatia, no. 71615/01, § 34-37, 15 July 2005).
Elle doit également démontrer que les frais ont réellement été exposés, qu'ils correspondaient à une nécessité et qu'ils sont raisonnables quant à leur taux (voir entre autres Wettstein c. Suisse, no 33958/96, § 56, CEDH 2000-XII).
According to the Court's constant case-law, the existence of impartiality for the purposes of Article 6 § 1 must be determined according to a subjective test where regard must be had to the personal conviction and behaviour of a particular judge, that is, whether the judge held any personal prejudice or bias in a given case; and also according to an objective test, that is to say by ascertaining whether the tribunal itself and, among other aspects, its composition, offered sufficient guarantees to exclude any legitimate doubt in respect of its impartiality (see, inter alia, Fey v. Austria, judgment of 24 February 1993, Series A no. 255, p. 12, §§ 27, 28 and 30, and Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96, § 42, ECHR 2000-XII).
MITRINOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
GEROVSKA POPCEVSKA v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
JAKSOVSKI AND TRIFUNOVSKI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
POPOSKI AND DUMA v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
NIKOLOV v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"

References: v. 
 § 44
 § 96
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 1
 v. 
 v. 
 § 42
 v. 
 § 36
 § 63
 v. 
 § 56
 v. 
 § 41
 v. 
 § 47
 v. 
 § 34
 § 56
 § 1
 v. 
 v. 
 § 42
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.