Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Extinction-or-suspension-of-rent-By-release-Part-5.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 01:47:57+00:00

Document:
25 Kan. 674, 37 Am. Rep. 277; Wattles v. South Omaha Ice & Coal Co., 50 Neb. 251, 36 L. R. A. 424, 61 Am. St. Rep 554, 69 N. W. 785; Coogan v. Parker, 2 S. C. 255, 16 Am. Rep. 659. The question of the equity of the rule is discussed in 1 Tiffany, Landlord & Ten., Sec. 182 m (1).
87. Ainsworth v. Ritt, 38 Cal. 89, 99 Am. Dec. 352; Schmidt v. Pettit, 8 Dist. Col. (1 Mc Arth) 179.
26 N. Y. 498; Moving Picture Co. v. Scottish etc. Ins. Co, 244 Pa. 358, 90 Atl. 642; Paxson & Comfort Co. v Potter, 30 Pa. Super Ct. 615; Porter v. Tull. 6 Wash. 408, 22 L. R. A. 613, 36 Am. St. Rep. 172, 33 Pac. 965.
89. Izon v. Gorton, 5 Bing N. Cas. 501; Marshall v. Schofield, 52 L. J. Q. B 58. See Selby v. Greaves, L. R. 3 C. P. 954.
90. See 1 Tiffany, Landlord & Tenant, Sec. 182 m (6).
91. Real Property Law, Sec. 197, changing the language of the original act of 1860.
Spear v. Baker, 117 Md. 570, 84 Atl. 62; Fink v. Weinholzer, 109 Minn. 381, 123 N. W. 931; Lin-'deke v. Mcarthur's Inc., 125 Minn. 1, Ann. Cas 1915C, 600, 145 X. W 399; Carley v. Liberty Hat Mfg. Co., 81 N. J. L. 502, 33 L. R. A. (N. S.) 545, 79 Atl. 447; Sayre v. Roseville Motor Co., 85 N. J. L. 10, 91 Atl. 596; Colonial Land Co v. Asmus, 82 N. J. L. 521, 81 Atl. 827; Acme Ground Rent Co. v. Werner, 151 Wis. 417, 139 N. W. 314.
93. Ante, Sec. 58(b). • 94. Upton v. Townend, 17 C. B. 30; Engstrom v. Tyler, 46 Kan. 317, 26 Pac. 735; Royce v. Guggenheim. 106 Mass. 201, 8 Am. Rep. 322; Osmers v. Furey, 32 Mont. 581, 81 Pac. 345; Bennett v. Bittle, 4 Rawle (Pa.) 339; Poston v. Jones, 37 N. C. (3 Ired. Eq.) 350, 38 Am. Dec. 683; Wolf v. Eppenstein, 71 Ore. 1, 140 Pac. 751.
Idaho, 671, 87 Pac. 1004; Smith v. Wise, 58 I11. 141; Smith v. Mcenany,. 170 Mass. 26, 64 Am. St. Rep. 272, 48 N. E. 781; Kus-chinsky v. Flanigan, 170 Mich. 245, 41 L. R. A. (N. S.) 430, Ann. Cas. 1914A, 1228, 136 N. W. 362; Christopher v. Austin, 11 N. Y. 216; Galleher v. O'grady, - N. H. -, 100 Atl. 549; Morris v. Kettle, 57 N. J. L. 218, 30 Atl. 879; Linton v. Hart, 25 Pa. 193, 64 Am. Dec. 691; Edmison v. Lowry, 3 S. D. 77, 17 L. R. A. 275, 44 Am. St. Rep. 774, 52 N. W. 583; Briggs v. Hall, 4 Leigh (Va.) 484, 26 Am. Dec. 326.. New York Dry Goods Store v. Pabst Brewing Co., 50 C C. A. 295, 112 Fed. 381; Contra in Alabama, Warren v. Wagner, 75 Ala. 188, 51 Am. Rep. 446; Anderson v. Winton, 136 Ala. 422, 34 So. 962.
96. Co. Litt. 319a; Mackubin v. Whetcraft, 4 Har. & Mch. (Md.) 135; Smith v. Mcenany, 170 Mass. 26, 64 Am. St. Rep. 272, 48 N. E. 781; Day v. Watson, 8 Mich. 535; Tiley v. Moyers, 43 Pa. 404.
- Eviction under paramount title. The liability for the rent comes to an end upon the eviction of the tenant from the entire premises by one having paramount title.4 Even though this eviction is merely con97. Cibel v. Hill, 1 Leon. 110; Bennett v. Bittle, 4 Rawle (Pa.) 339.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.