Source: http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013_01_06_archive.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 14:10:39+00:00

Document:
I just finished reading Alexander M. Bickel's "The Least Dangerous Branch." Mr. Bickel was obviously infatuated with the Supreme Court's then recent rulings on civil rights when he wrote his book in 1962. What he fails to acknowledge is that the Supreme Court CREATED all the problems vitiated in Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954). The Supreme Court created Jim Crow over We the People's act of congress "The purpose of the first section of the act of Congress of March 1, 1875, was to prevent race discrimination in respect of the accommodations and facilities of inns, public conveyances, and places of public amusement. It does not assume to define the general conditions and limitations under which inns, public conveyances, and places of public amusement may be conducted, but only declares that such conditions and limitations, whatever they may be, shall not be applied so as to work a discrimination solely because of race, color, or previous condition of servitude" MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissenting. Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 26 (1883). The Supreme Court USURPED power of the divine right of king's sophistry in the place of reason to claim, in regard to the Colfax Riot, "The fourteenth amendment prohibits a State from depriving any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; but this adds nothing to the rights of one citizen as against another" Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 at 554.
That is obviously absurd to any reasonable judicial decision when mass murder is not prosecuted by the state on behalf of the deceased victims the state is in effect depriving those victims, unable to speak for themselves, with the protection of the law i.e., "nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." The Supreme Court quashed the efforts of a nation, that had suffered 750,000 casualties in the civil war, to free the slaves and establish them equal under the law i.e., "The very highest duty of the States, when they entered into the Union under the Constitution, was to protect all persons within their boundaries in the enjoyment of these "unalienable rights with which they were endowed by their Creator"" Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 at 554. The Supreme Court in the United States of America is the MOST powerful and the least accountable force in our government of the people, by the people and for the people.
"Whoever attentively considers the different departments of power must perceive, that, in a government in which they are separated from each other, the judiciary, from the nature of its functions, will always be the least dangerous to the political rights of the Constitution; because it will be least in a capacity to annoy or injure them. The Executive not only dispenses the honors, but holds the sword of the community. The legislature not only commands the purse, but prescribes the rules by which the duties and rights of every citizen are to be regulated. The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse; no direction either of the strength or of the wealth of the society; and can take no active resolution whatever. It may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm even for the efficacy of its judgments."
What neither Mr. Bickel nor Mr. Hamilton saw is/was the unrestrained corrupt, malicious and incompetent rulings that would emanate from the human fallibility of Supreme Court, that, are for We the People too unassailable.
There is no check on the Judiciary to enforce "There is no position which depends on clearer principles, than that every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void." What Alexander Hamilton nor Chief Justice Marshal nor Mr. Bickel seem willing to acknowledge is that the Supreme Court, a delegated authority, acting under a sworn to constitutional commission are humanly fallible the result of their inescapable biology. They maliciously, corruptly, incompetently and self-servingly quashed their constitutional commission's compulsory Justice based on the constitutionally required reciprocity of the Jury System in both law and equity and awarded themselves and others "absolute immunity" from said constitutional commission to "do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid" i.e., the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America."
As proof I offer Supreme Court Precedent that has created ABSOLUTE POWER from ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY for the "malicious or corrupt" judges, the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor,  the "knowingly false testimony by police officers" and "all (malicious, corrupt, dishonest and incompetent) persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process,"  acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION.
NO one has the protection of the law in the United States of America today, just like in the Colfax Parish Massacre the Supreme Court is culpable in the deprivation of "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America." And there IS NOTHING We the People as individuals can do about it.!!!!!!
Alexander M. Bickel in "The Least Dangerous Branch" states "There are three course of conduct that can erode and will finally defeat the rather miraculous phenomenon of the rule of Judicial principle. One is the attempt to push its dominion past natural limits. Another is manipulation – though to the highest ulterior ends, no doubt- of principles that are not tenable for their own sake. A third is to call its name in vain, until even its genuine invocation ceases to produce the reflex of acceptance. "
1. "One is the attempt to push its dominion past natural limits."
a. Absolute Immunity by definition "push its dominion past natural limits." Absolute immunity enables the Judiciary to "do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid" i.e., the "deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America"
2. "Another is manipulation – though to the highest ulterior ends, no doubt- of principles that are not tenable for their own sake."
a. Absolute Immunity is transparent, base and inexcusably self-serving. We need our officials to be RESPONSIBLE to our rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America not immune from them.
3. "A third is to call its name in vain, until even its genuine invocation ceases to produce the reflex of acceptance."
a. If Absolute Immunity is not the vainest of assertions, I do not know what is. At the end of the Civil War this judicial hubris was at it apex when the Supreme Court Sanctioned mass murder, the pogrom (mass slaughter) of the newly emancipated African America CITIZENS and 150 years of Jim Crow's lynching with Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871), United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875) The Colfax Riot, Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) and Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) It was not like they did not know what they were doing they had the well reasoned dissent from the newly confirmed Justice Harlan (In office November 29, 1877 – October 14, 1911) in both the Civil Rights Cases and Plessy.
-- and the leave was refused"
The Supreme Court believes that they need the independence to deprive We the People of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America" for our benefit and that they could not secure justice and Liberty for ourselves and our prosperity unless they had power to AT WILL deprive We the People of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States of America."
Mr. Bickel says "But never the judiciary, never above all, the Supreme Court, even when it does least and less than least, as in dismissing cases outright. Expediency dictates that the judges be then excused from articulating reasons, but never from reason itself."
"Immunity is given to crime, and the records of the public tribunals are searched in vain for any evidence of effective redress." "The courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity." I say it NOW, Saturday, January 12, 2013!!! Justice William O. Douglas said it in 1961 and 1967.  Mr. Lowe of Kansas and Mr. Rainey of South Carolina respectively said it originally in 1871.
 Article III, §1 & 2 and Article. VI, 2nd Paragraph of the Constitution for the United States of America.
"On this site occurred the Colfax Riot in which three white men and 150 negroes were slain. This event on April 13, 1873, marked the end of carpetbag misrule in the South."
Constitutional commentator Leonard Levy wrote, "Cruikshank paralyzed the federal government's attempt to protect black citizens by punishing violators of their Civil Rights and, in effect, shaped the Constitution to the advantage of the Ku Klux Klan." Federal civil rights enforcement was blocked by Cruikshank until 1966 (United States v. Price; United States v. Guest) when the Court vitiated Cruikshank.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 §1
 v. 
 v.