Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/120509.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 01:59:46+00:00

Document:
HOVNANIAN: Payment to Settle Suit in Florida Completed in Dec.
NOKIA CORP: To Defend Against Shareholder Class Action in N.Y.
and FMG LLC filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
to the Company's April 18, 2012, Form 20-F filing with the U.S.
in a class action lawsuit filed by Luis Alberto Duran.
the General Attorney's office on February 11, 2011.
that their case should not proceed as a class action.
an order for costs in favor of the stockbroker.
Lawyers, which is representing Bell Potter in the matter.
claimant Jillian Meaden to be a "totally inappropriate"
the rest would be determined.
Potter, when they bought shares in Progen in December 2006.
A class action lawsuit commenced by a former Liraz Systems Ltd.
Solutions Ltd.'s April 17, 2012, Form 20-F filing with the U.S.
As previously reported, in June 2003, a former Liraz Systems Ltd.
mandatory purchase was lower than the fair price of Liraz shares.
After meeting on May 4 behind closed doors with attorneys, U.S.
settlement on Nov. 8, 2012.
losses on the 2010 spill off the coast of Louisiana.
Judge Barbier to set a new trial for this summer.
Horizon drilling rig over environmental damage from the spill.
will be capped at $2.3 billion.
class, and does not grant excessive compensation to attorneys,"
Facility fund, which BP set up with $20 million.
settlement is a great deal for those with claims.
who were denied claims by GCCF."
had filed claims with GCCF, with more than 20,000 paid.
business and how close it was to the coastal area.
of receiving the most for economic loss, he said.
BP set up had been administered and claims processed.
entity related to or affiliated with any of the Defendants.
liable for the Company's expenses in the other forum.
quarter ended January 31, 2012.
The Company is named as a defendant in four lawsuits ("hot fuel"
punitive damages. The amounts sought are not quantified.
motions for class certification in each of the pending lawsuits.
LLC, et. al., Case No. 07-2053, and Wilson v. Ampride, Inc., et.
al., Case No. 06-2582, in which the Company is a named Defendant.
affiliates of Defendants) that made such purchases.
complained of, and intends to contest the matter vigorously.
re Coinstar, Inc. Securities Litigation.
District Court for the Western District of Washington in the U.S.
hearing without providing another notice.
you will be bound by the Final Order and Judgment of the Court.
Notice, such that they are received no later than July 20, 2012.
will be bound by the Final Order and Judgment of the Court.
continuing to obtain delivery from their local public utilities.
percent over their local utility company."
indicate that its rates are market-based and highly competitive,"
ensures the lowest possible prices for its customers.
and electrical supplier to Energy Plus.
remaining with their local utilities. . . .
charged a total of $247 more than a PSEG customer would pay.
enrolled with Energy Plus," the complaint states.
breach of faith and unjust enrichment.
trucks over an 11-year period.
said evidence submitted by Ford was wrongly excluded.
Ford disclosed the reversal in a quarterly filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 4.
had to pay disgruntled dealers.
first trial," said Ford spokeswoman Marcey Evans.
options after reviewing the court's opinion.
that effectively overcharged some dealers.
trucks from 1987 to 1997.
dealers nationwide nearly $2 billion.
to about 3,100 other dealers.
contract that the dealers said Ford had breached as "ambiguous."
ruling in a regulatory filing.
paid less than the experts said they should have, they argued.
paid for identical trucks varied widely.
fight the online search engine giant.
the display of small snippets of text.
publisher for these displays," she said.
fighting a company as large as Google.
common questions of law and fact."
lawsuits from authors and photographers.
through a class action," the judge said.
Department of Justice and even foreign governments.
sued in 2005. The photographers' lawsuit was filed two years ago.
"Now all of a sudden Google is saying, 'You don't have standing,'"
to put off pretrial challenges while talks were going on.
litigation matter where ownership and fair use are at issue."
about 130 million titles into its digital library.
informed that an author or publisher objected.
print -- to be preserved and given new life.
Exchange Commission for quarterly period ended January 31, 2012.
the amended complaint with leave for plaintiffs to amend.
Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on October 31, 2008.
Commission for quarterly period ended January 31, 2012.
Hovnanian Enterprises, Inc. and K. Hovnanian Venture I, L.L.C.
Exchange Commission for the year ended December 31, 2011.
or otherwise respond to the amended complaint is July 30, 2012.
punitive damages, and other damages.
the plaintiffs allege potential damages in excess of $5 million.
adverse effect on its operations and financial results.
New York on behalf of purchasers of Magna International Inc.
operations and business prospects during the Class Period.
significantly less than Wall Street estimates.
out of the price of Magna stock.
Contact: Samuel H. Rudman, Esq.
conditions to join the suit last year, making it a class action.
Americans with Disabilities Act and the Nursing Home Reform Act.
receive while they live in nursing homes.
the process and are pleased with the outcome."
by the Group and certain of its officers and directors of the U.S.
a consolidated amended class action complaint on May 31, 2011.
argument on the motion was held on January 18, 2012.
The Group is awaiting a ruling on the motion.
its directors and officers intend to defend themselves vigorously.
the dismissal of purported class action lawsuits.
-- Arfa v. Mecox Lane Limited, et al., No. 10-CV-9053 and Brady v.
officers under Section 15 of the Securities Act.
distribution of its Sprint Fidelis family of defibrillation leads.
settlement in the third quarter of fiscal year 2012.
Company and certain current and former officers in the U.S.
consolidated putative class action complaint expanding the class.
denied on February 3, 2010, and pretrial proceedings are underway.
currently probable or reasonably estimable under U.S. GAAP.
loss, if any, that may result from this matter.
action lawsuit against Nokia and its executives in the U.S.
performance would be worse than expected."
damages from Nokia for its troubles over the last six months.
through this transition period," Mr. Siilasmaa said.
handset maker has misled investors.
manufacturers like Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and HTC Corp.
are down nearly 40% since it issued a profit warning last month.
violated the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
defend itself against the complaint.
might have been exposed to the banned insecticide dioxin.
south of Port Macquarie, and the spill was buried nearby.
been unearthed and he will meet the doctor and the workers today.
the government, against the RMS," he said.
here that have signed their death warrant.
"In terms of the exposure that they've been exposed to."
suggestions there has been any sort of cover-up over the incident.
on the site broke out in rashes and sores.
experiencing rashes and sores," he said.
to be done, they have to be done.
hand, they will be released."
and selling prestige fragrances and beauty related products.
Stock Market on April 13, 2012.
awarding damages, costs and attorneys' fees.
share price since the announcement of the proposed transaction.
consummation of the merger, and did not grant any other relief.
Discovery in the Dias litigation continues.
captioned as Shirley Anderson v. Parlux Fragrances, Inc., et al.
motion for a preliminary injunction filed in the Dias action.
District Judge William J. Haynes, Jr.
AND FEBRUARY 25, 2009, INCLUSIVE.
BY A LAWSUIT NOW PENDING IN THIS COURT.
1. What Is This Notice And Why Is It Important?
The District Court has certified this lawsuit as a class action.
other people who are allegedly in a similar position.
Retirement System v. Psychiatric Solutions, Inc., et al., Case No.
liability whatsoever to any members of the Class.
reconsider and/or appeal ruling was denied by the District Court.
Fact discovery is now ongoing.
by which you can obtain additional information.
Notice carefully to decide what to do.
out or exclude themselves. See page 3 for further discussion.
Members who do not exclude themselves.
3. How Do I Know If I Am A Class Member?
between February 21, 2008 and February 25, 2009, inclusive.
and any other entity owned or controlled by PSI; (ii) Joey A.
interest or assigns of any of the foregoing.
4. If I Am A Class Member, What Are My Options?
Option 1. Do Nothing. Stay In The Lawsuit.
or benefits from the lawsuit.
Dennis J. Herman, Esq. George E. Barrett, Esq.
Daniel J. Pfefferbaum, Esq. Douglas S. Johnston, Jr., Esq.
ROBBINS GELLER RUDMAN & DOWD LLP Timothy L. Miles, Esq.
available about Class Counsel on the Web sites listed above.
settlement, Class Counsel will seek attorneys' fees and expenses.
recover in other lawsuits involving defendants may be impacted.
District Court issues in this case, including final judgment.
Option 2. Exclude Yourself From The Lawsuit.
5. How Do I Exclude Myself From The Class?
OR NOT IT IS FAVORABLE TO LEAD PLAINTIFF AND YOU.
6. How Do I Find Out More About This Lawsuit?
also contact Class Counsel at their Web sites, listed above.
OF THE COURT REGARDING THIS NOTICE.
to a recently filed lawsuit.
they bought on credit, according to the lawsuit.
said the ranch would not comment further on the lawsuit.
include at least 50 people.
Farmworker Justice in Washington, D.C.
violating federal laws that prohibit the exploitation of workers.
challenging the Company's acquisition of Smurfit-Stone: Marks v.
complaint in Spencer was designated as the operative complaint.
wholly-owned subsidiary that is the successor to Smurfit-Stone).
statement relating to appraisal rights.
the court took the matter under advisement.
March 7, 2012 and the "Participation Deadline" is April 9, 2012.
allegedly allowing money to be diverted from three such plans.
(the hospital's) misappropriation of funds," the lawsuit alleges.
insurance benefit plans toward other unspecified uses.
payment of costs, expenses and attorney fees.
filed for bankruptcy April 9.
That proceeding is pending before U.S. Bankruptcy Judge John J.
hospital had filed it, to a Chapter 7 liquidation.
the hospital as a defendant or make any claim against it.
received notice of Ms. Shadler and Ms. Stavinski's lawsuit.
bankruptcy court on behalf of the plaintiffs against the hospital.
benefit, according to the lawsuit.
as applied to all class members," the lawsuit reads in part.
litigation, according to the lawsuit.
Bancorporation, Inc., a South Carolina corporation ("Peoples").
as the surviving entity following the merger (the "Merger").
the Court, captioned F. Davis Arnette and Mary F. Arnette, et al.
directors (the "Director Defendants") and SCBT.
settlement as contemplated by the MOU may be terminated.
the Proxy Statement/Prospectus are adequate under applicable law.
the Merger and any disclosure obligations in connection therewith.
The Defendant is the owner and landlord of the apartment building.
Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.
desperate workers, while not paying them much more than before.
time cards and not pay them the overtime wages they were owed.
thing -- altering work records and not paying over time.
Mart that their car required an oil change within 3,000 miles.
Law and constitutes unjust enrichment under California law, Ms.
is needed when it is not.
Ms. Krouch is a resident of Oakland, California.
America, many of which offer oil changes to customers.
replacement of the faulty connectors that will inevitably fail.
costly water damage, according to the Complaint filed in the U.S.
buyers or recall the Chinese-made product from the U.S. market.
that Watts and the other defendants acknowledged this problem,"
foul odors in ordinary use.
consumers like them will have their day in court."
or mildew in the machines, ruined laundry, and foul odors.
warranty, negligent design, and negligent failure to warn.
Judge Gwin, and for which class certification will be sought.
Washing Machine Class Action Litigation, No. 08-51 (D. N.J.).
product identification and informational purposes only.
Contact: Jonathan D. Selbin, Esq.
food companies' nutrient content claims.
that flavonoids convey the health benefits asserted.
statement required by federal regulations.
the false advertising cases onslaught?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.