Source: https://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=%2013-18-14%20&s=OH&d=121662
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 22:23:34+00:00

Document:
Re: STATE OF OHIO v. ROBERT L. NORVILLE, JR.
STATE OF OHIO v. ROBERT L. NORVILLE, JR.
cut on her thigh and that Carter had blood on his lips and red marks on his face. Tr.
was present at the time of the alleged break-in and assault. Tr. 123.
April 13, 2018. Doc. 37. Appellant then filed his notice of appeal on May 3, 2018.
The jury erred by convicting Mr. Norville of felonious assault against the manifest weight of the evidence and the State failed to introduce sufficient evidence to support the conviction.
asserts that the State did not meet its burden of production at trial. State v.
adequacy. State v. Barga, 3d Dist. Shelby No. 17-17-14, 2018-Ohio-2804, ¶ 10.
reasonable juror—is sufficient to support a guilty verdict. State v. Pierce, 3d Dist.
of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt.’” State v. Beaver, 3d Dist.
evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution. State v. Brown, 3d Dist.
Hancock No. 5-17-19, 2018-Ohio-899, ¶ 8.
that Norville (1) knowingly (2) caused serious physical harm to another person.
(e) Any physical harm that involves acute pain of such duration as to result in substantial suffering or that involves any degree of prolonged or intractable pain.
record was admitted into evidence. Ex. 10. Tr. 189-190.
he “curled up in a ball on [his] knees” and that he did not retaliate against Norville.
Tr. 143. Carter believed the assault lasted about three minutes. Tr. 145.
14. He also stated that his glasses were broken during the assault. Tr. 144.
liver cancer, and they kicked me dead square in the liver several times.” Tr. 146.
Carter’s face and side. Ex. 7-9.
injuries were “very painful” and that these injuries involved a prolonged recovery.
v. Davis, 3d Dist. Seneca No. 13-16-30, 2017-Ohio-2916, ¶ 17, quoting State v.
quoting State v. Coleman, 3d Dist. Allen No. 1-13-53, 2014-Ohio-5320, ¶ 7.
quoting State v. Clark, 101 Ohio App.3d 389, 409, 655 N.E.2d 795 (8th Dist.1995).
conviction,’ should an appellate court overturn the trial court’s judgment.” State v.
Ohio St.3d 67, 2011-Ohio-6524, 960 N.E.2d 955, ¶ 119.
in his pocket but testified that he did not take it out during the assault. Tr. 152.
(“Norman”) and that Norman was now in a relationship with Norville. Tr. 159-160.
He claimed that he was not irritated by Norville’s relationship with Norman. Tr.
assault, but one of the three men shoved her up against the bedroom door frame. Tr.
she did not let Norville into the trailer and that Norville “pushed the door open.” Tr.
Norville. Tr. 187. Britne denied setting up the attack. Tr. 187.
went to his mother’s trailer but that Carter was gone by the time he arrived. Tr. 194.
had not pulled out a knife. Tr. 203. He also denied shoving Chilcutt. Tr. 217.
Carter’s trailer on the way to Chilcutt’s trailer and that he had a conviction for theft.
the purpose of beating Carter. Tr. 210.
complicity to commit arson, stealing stolen property, and tampering with evidence.
“threat” to Norville. Tr. 227.
pulled out a knife, prompting an argument between Norville and Carter. Tr. 244.
entering, tampering with evidence, and possession of criminal tools. Tr. 246.
evidence. Thus, Norville’s first assignment of error is overruled.
failed to subpoena the doctor who treated the alleged victim. We disagree.
deficient performance prejudiced the defendant.” In re C.N., 3d Dist. Hardin Nos.
the test.” State v. Walker, 2016-Ohio-3499, 66 N.E.3d 349, ¶ 20 (3d Dist.).
enough to sustain a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.” Conway at ¶ 103.
(1976), paragraph four of the syllabus.
medical report was subsequently admitted into evidence as an exhibit. Tr. 190.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 

v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.