Source: https://www.cojk.com/practice-areas/services/litigation-and-dispute-resolution
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 03:50:57+00:00

Document:
Professionals Anable, James W. Ashton, Jennifer R. Billick, Tim W. Calkins, Lindsay Cruz, Laura A. Danley, Jeffrey E. Denkenberger, John D. Fitzpatrick, B. Casey Fruehling, Everett E. Junkin, Jennifer L. Lee, Katherine D. Maliska, Thomas P. McMahon, Brian F. Nowak, Melissa A. Self, Jon T., Ph.D. Stallman, Brandon C. Whitaker, John E. Yarberry, Kyle E. Zheng, Juan , Ph.D.
Successful companies aggressively enforce and defend their IP rights in the global market. IP litigation, however, can be extremely complex and the stakes are usually very high. At COJK, we understand the inherent risks of litigation, whether to a product line, a business unit, or an entire business. We work with our clients to understand their desired outcomes and develop a litigation strategy that advances their business goals.
We handle all types of IP matters and disputes, including cases that involve patents, trademarks, trade dress, trade secrets, copyrights, and license agreements and contracts. We have represented clients ranging from entrepreneurs to multinational corporations, across a diverse array of industries, including agriculture, aerospace, alternative energy, automotive, biotechnology, computer hardware and networking, construction and building, consumer goods, environmental science, entertainment and gaming, financial services, heavy duty vehicles and machinery, mechanical devices, medical diagnostics and devices, mobile technology and devices, pharmaceuticals, pulp and paper, recreational equipment, semiconductors, software, and telecommunications.
COJK attorneys – many of whom have technical degrees – are skilled at presenting highly complex, technical cases to a judge or jury in an understandable way. We manage all phases of a jury trial, arbitration, mediation, or an appeal, and represent clients nationally and internationally through a close network of foreign associates. Our attorneys have represented clients in federal district courts across the country and before the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. We also have experience with U.S. Customs, with proceedings before the International Trade Commission, and with trademark opposition and cancellation actions before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Representing plaintiff Bombardier, Inc. in a complaint alleging among other claims, trade secret misappropriation under federal and state law.
Hydro-Blok USA LLC, et al. v. wedi Corp.
Representing Hydro-Blok USA LLC, et al. in patent infringement, Lanham Act, false advertising, and breach of contract causes of action.
wedi Corp. v. Seattle Glass Block Window, Inc.
Representing defendant Seattle Glass Block Window, Inc. against a complaint for various causes of action, including breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, and misappropriation of trade secrets.
Representing defendants Shinn Fu Company of America, Inc. and Shinn Fu Corporation against complaint for allegations of patent infringement.
Local counsel representing plaintiff New Flyer Industries Canada ULC and New Flyer of America Inc. in a trademark infringement case.
Herbert E. Townsend v. Brooks Sports, Inc.
Local counsel representing plaintiff Herbert E. Townsend in a patent infringement complaint.
Representing defendant Executive Marketing Consultants, Inc. against a complaint for Lanham Act violations and trademark infringement.
MercAsia USA, Ltd. v. Jianqing “Johnny” Zhu and 3BTech, Inc.
Representing MercAsia USA, Ltd. in enforcing patent rights and to obtain preliminary injunction related to consumer products.
wedi Corp. v. Wright et al.
Representing defendant Hydro-Blok USA LLC et al. against complaint of various causes of action, including unjust enrichment based on misappropriation of trade secrets.
Microsoft Corporation v. The Software King et al.
Represented defendants against allegations of copyright and trademark infringement and related commercial claims.
Represented defendant Hummingbird Scientific against allegations of patent infringement pertaining to electron microscope sample holder technology, and to oppose a related motion for preliminary injunction. Obtained early dismissal of case after opposing motion for preliminary injunction.
Successfully defended PACCAR Inc in a declaratory judgment action to enforce various patent rights and defend against various state law unfair business practice allegations.
FSI Fabrication, Inc. v. Supreme International, Ltd.
Represented defendant Supreme International, Ltd. against allegations of trade dress infringement.
Weatherhaven Resources, Inc. et al. v. Vantem Modular, LLC et al.
Represented all defendants in patent litigation matter pertaining to mechanical devices.
Defended PACCAR Inc in patent infringement litigation pertaining to mechanical devices.
PACCAR Inc v. Four State Int'l Trucks, Inc. et al.
Successfully represented plaintiff PACCAR Inc to enforce intellectual property rights in various design patents, trademarks, and trade dress.
InterForm Inc. v. Target Corp.
Successfully defended Target Corporation in patent litigation matter pertaining to mechanical devices.
Molycorp Minerals, LLC v. HaloSource, Inc.
Represented defendant HaloSource, Inc. in a suit for breach of contract, misappropriation, and declaration of ownership of certain intellectual property related to water purification.
Bitreserve, Ltd. et al. v. Bitgold, Inc. et al.
Successfully represented Bitgold, Inc. et al. in a trademark infringement matter.
Successfully represented third party Research In Motion, Ltd. to prevent public disclosure of sensitive information produced during the course of discovery.
Defended Seattle Safety, LLC in a suit for breach of contract, trade secret misappropriation, unfair competition and patent infringement related to crash test sleds.
Defended Jore Corporation in a patent infringement and patent mismarking case related to flexible extensions for powered screwdrivers.
QSC Holdings, Inc. et al. v. Eastern Acoustic Works, Inc.
Defended Eastern Acoustic Works in patent case related to high frequency acoustic speakers.
Uniloc USA, Inc et al. v. Engrasp, Inc. et al.
Defended Seagull Scientific, Inc. in a multi-defendant patent case related to a system for software registration.
Representing patent owner Jingle Master International Ltd. in an inter partes review proceeding for a certain claim of US Patent No. 7,882,986 related to liquid dispensing devices.
Represented petitioner Taser International in an inter partes review proceeding for certain claims of US Patent No. 9,253,452 related to surveillance systems.
Represented petitioner Taser International in an inter partes review proceeding for certain claims of US Patent No. 8,781,292 related to surveillance systems.
Successfully represented patent owner PACCAR Inc in an inter partes review proceeding that challenged the invalidity of a design patent related to a truck headlight. Obtained denial of institution of the inter partes review on Patent No. D525,731.
Successfully represented patent owner PACCAR Inc in an inter partes review proceeding that challenged the invalidity of a design patent related to a truck headlight. Obtained denial of institution of the inter partes review on Patent No. D526,429.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.