Source: http://newslawonline.blogspot.com/2012/08/
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 18:59:11+00:00

Document:
First, thank you for "Millionaire-Minds-In-Transformation" Yahoo " millionairemindsintraining@yahoogroups.com "
During the last 6 years, it has a been a very helpful serie of e-mails of people who want to improve their life. However, I don't need these e-mails anymore.
I was receiving the Google e-mails twice, one into my Yahoo e-mail box and the other into my Google e-mail box. I unsubscribed at my Google e-mail box a little while ago and had no problem.
I still receive the Google e-mails at my Yahoo address. As you can see at the bottom there is no way to unsubscribe.
As you are the moderator and have more control than me, please help me to unsubscribe.
This email is brought to you by Hay House, Inc.
Join us online as your favorite authors and speakers lecture on topics ranging from personal and global transformation, manifestation and happiness to past lives, and guidance from your angels. Click here to view the Video Streaming Schedule.
Can't Make It? Watch I Can Do It! Washington DC LIVE Online!
Add system-hayhouse@e-hayhouse.com to your address book.
[MMIT Happy Blue Moon... last chance for super special!
Happy Blue Moon! May this special full moon support your well being and fill your hear with love, grace and wisdom!
Last chance to take advantage of my super Blue Moon specials!
They end at midnight tonight!
Once in a Blue Moon Special!
August 31, 2012 marks the second Full Moon this month.
At 6:58 am PDT the full moon is in Pisces!
Move into the flow of who you are!
Discounts good until August 31, 2012 Midnight PDT.
Session time can be used for the whole next year!
I do have packages of time available too!
Check out my upcoming interview and telesummit events!
!!! Only EAD/GC/ US Citizen required !!!
Job Description: Responsible for the planning, coordination and implementation to migrate 8 central Oracle databases from a physical to virtual environment. Knowledge of Oracle from a DBA point of view required. Must have knowledge of Oracle replication including Advanced Replication and Materialized views. 2. Skills include Oracle 11G, PLSQL, Stored procedures and functions, Advanced Replication and materialized views, PERL, and Windows 2003 64 bit server or higher. 3. Good oral and written communication skills. Must be able to work with others. 4. Knowledge of Oracle 11G a must. This person will be responsible to develop and test a migration strategy that is to be used by the Oracle production support team. The individual will also assist the Oracle production support team in the migration activities. The individual will be responsible for troubleshooting all related issues that may occur during and after the migration.
Database to point to Oracle Database.
[Drug and Device Law] What Is Buckman?
We’re rather tired of the other side, abetted by the flawed reasoning in Desiano v. Warner Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff’d by equally divided court, 552 U.S. 440 (2008), attempting to distinguish Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs Legal Committee, 531 U.S. 341 (2001), into oblivion as relating to nothing more than a “separate, freestanding” claim for “fraud on the FDA.” We’ve argued until we’re blue in the face that Buckman (which was unanimous, but with a concurrence) was so much more than that; specifically an implied preemption case with broad implications. Most courts get it, but enough don’t that we thought we’d investigate a little further. So we’ve asked ourselves the question, What has the Supreme Court itself had to say about Buckman in the decade-plus since it’s been decided?
We ran a quick search and found that the Supreme Court has cited its Buckman decision seven times. We’ll look at the drug/device cases first. In PLIVA v. Mensing, 131 S. Ct. 2567 (2011), the Court cited Buckman as a “cf.” (that’s an abbreviation of the Latin “confer” meaning to compare/consult) to the plaintiffs’ “take steps” argument (which the Court rejected) that the manufacturer should have asked the FDA for help. Id. at 2578. Did the Mensing majority limit Buckman to a freestanding count for fraud on the FDA? Hardly. Instead, it described Buckman just the way we do, as “holding that federal drug and medical device laws pre-empted a state tort-law claim based on failure to properly communicate with the FDA.” Id. That’s how Buckman should be read − that any state-law claims purporting to intrude on a defendant’s communications with the FDA are preempted. The quality of a regulated entity’s communications with a federal agency is simply none of state law’s business.
Then there’s Wyeth v. Levine, 555 U.S. 555 (2009), the case we most love to hate. Levine also discussed Buckman, albeit in dueling footnotes, this time in the context of the “presumption against preemption.” Id. at 565 n.3. Buckman was not, the majority noted, apt precedent for rejecting that presumption entirely in implied preemption cases, because it “involved state-law fraud-on-the-agency claims, and the Court distinguished state regulation of health and safety as matters to which the presumption does apply.” Id. Even in this worst case (which is what Levine is) scenario, the discussion is confined to the scope of a presumption (which later couldn’t muster a majority in Mensing) rather than addressing preemption directly. Levine certainly is not limited to anything about freestanding claims.
Petitioner’s dealings with the FDA were prompted by federal law, and the very subject matter of petitioner's statements to the FDA were dictated by federal law. Accordingly − and in contrast to situations implicating federalism concerns and the historic primacy of state regulation of matters of health and safety − no presumption against pre-emption obtains.
Id. at 624 & n.14 (citation and quotation marks omitted). While we obviously prefer the Levine dissent, there doesn’t seem to be any support − in the Levine majority or dissent − for not applying Buckman’s rationale to any situation implicating the information submitted by a regulated entity to its regulating authority.
That’s two − actually call it 2½, since Buckman was string-cited (with no separate discussion) for basically the same presumption-related proposition by the dissent in Altria Group, Inc. v. Good, 555 U.S. 70, 99 (2008) (the majority in Good not mentioning it at all).
In some areas of uniquely federal concern − e.g., fraud in a federal administrative process . . . this Court has held that a State has no legitimate interest in enforcing a federal scheme.
[a] determin[ation] that allowing a state tort action would cause applicants before a federal agency to submit a deluge of information that the agency neither wants nor needs, resulting in additional burdens on the agency’s evaluation of an application, and harmful delays in the agency process.
Id. (citation and quotation marks omitted). Thus, whenever such “interference” − which impacted upon the quality and quantiy of information submitted to a federal agency (notably the Court substituted “agency” for “FDA”) − was present, preemption would exist. Id. The dissent agreed, relying on Buckman’s holding that the “relationship between a federal agency and the entity it regulates is inherently federal in character because the relationship originates from, is governed by, and terminates according to federal law.” Id. at 2006. Thus we find in Whiting (in more than one of its multiple opinions) additional support for a broad reading of Buckman as applicable to all communications with all federal agencies.
Finally, Buckman has also been cited solely in dissents and concurrences. In Thompson v. Western States Medical Center, 535 U.S. 357 (2002), Justice Thomas’ dissent cited (“cf.” again) Buckman for an extremely broad proposition − that “flexibility” is “necessary if FDA is to pursue difficult (and often competing) objectives.” Id. at 389. It’s only one justice, but again Buckman is recognized as standing for a proposition much more extensive than what to do with a peculiar type of claim. In Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2678 (2011), Buckman was also cited by the dissent (once again as a “cf.”), this time for its discussion of off-label use. That’s a more limited issue, but still one that’s not limited by any particular claim.
What we make of all this is that, on several occasions − in Mensing, Whiting, and Arizona for sure, and to a lesser extent in Levine − the Supreme Court has had occasion to comment upon what its holding in Buckman was all about. In those cases, Buckman has been described as relating to state-law-based evaluation of the communication between a regulated person (including but not limited to drug/device manufacturers) and its federal regulating authority (including but not limited to the FDA). In no case has the Supreme Court held, described, or suggested that Buckman is somehow limited to how a plaintiff denominates such a claim in his/her pleadings. In sum, there’s no support in any Supreme Court case for the rationale followed by the Second Circuit in the Desiano case, and only Justice Roberts’ unfortunate recusal prevented the Supreme Court from tossing it then and there.
· Data development and database development for application development.
Please email me your detailed word format resume, contact info, availability date and all inclusive billing rate.
Urgently Required: Sr. BODS consultant with ADP, Adapter.
Position: Sr. BODS consultant with ADP, Adapter.
Experience with sales force CRM adapters.
* ETL using Data Services..
* Experience on Data Services, ADP, Adapter.
updated resume along with contact details at the earliest.
Extensive Software development expertise, Salesforce CRM,Force.com platform, Agile methodology,multi tasking,self motivated.
combination of education and experience may be considered.
along with analytical, problem-solving, and technical design skills.
Statistical Genetics & Bioinformatics is desired.
BACK FILL ::: QA W/ Selenium !! Boston, MA !! 6+ Months.
Job Title: QA W/ Selenium.
They need to know Cognos 10.1 and be a Senior Developer. We have an exclusive on this opening and it is for an immediate start.
Please do send the resume to rajsandy@addonusa.com to the given below requirement.
It's an immediate requirement please sent me the suitable resumes ASAP. Please make sure the candidate has all the required skills.
Expert knowledge in responsive design, mobile platforms, cross-browser capabilities and coding techniques.
Knowledge and experience on performance, accessibility and usability.
Highly competent with user interface and the intricacies of web site design for complex information or functionality.
Need software Developer.., NYC NY..
Client is looking for an energetic and organized candidate to fill a long-term contract opportunity for a Software Developer in our New York office. In this position, you'll work as a key member of our Engineering team to design, build and test a groundbreaking product for our client – a premier global financial institution.
· Be a core developer of a SOA / WebServices platform that integrates with 3rd party financial and gaming systems.
· Be a core contributor to the development and implementation of a robust platform for a premier global financial institution.
· Participate in architecture planning and review meetings with our VP of Technology and Senior Software Tech Lead.
· Participate in technical discussions and implementation meetings with our in-house team of architects, engineers and project managers.
· Document APIs for 3rd party developers.
· Provide technical support to 3rd party developers integrating with our platform.
· 4+ years developing and coding front-end and middle-tier of web applications.
· Excellent coding and OOP design skills.
· 3+ years developing web applications on industry app server platforms and frameworks such as WebSphere, JBoss, Spring, Tomcat, .NET, Rails.
· Proficiency in working with Web service based APIS, including Soap, XMLRPC.
· Working knowledge integrating SQL based database calls into middleware and front-end modules and scripts.
· Familiarity working in lean / Agile development processes.
· Understanding of and demonstrated experience in the full software development lifecycle, including functional and technical specifications, implementation, QA, deployment and maintenance.
· Ability to work daily in our New York City office.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.