Source: https://www.heerlaw.com/christopher-heer-publications
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 20:17:26+00:00

Document:
Christopher Heer presents a webinar entitled "The Use of Performance Data in Your Law Firm" for the Clear Law Institute.
Christopher Heer speaks on a panel entitled "Tactical Considerations in Bringing Motions Before the Federal Court" at the Ontario Bar Association's program on Intellectual Property Litigation.
Christopher D. Heer, Chapter 17, "Directions to Attend", Intellectual Property Litigation - Forms and Precedents, LexisNexis, 2016.
Christopher Heer speaks on "Advising Clients on Patent Strategy in Their First Few Years of a New Business" at a program entitled "Intellectual Property Law: Practice Primers & Contemporary Developments" offered by webinar by The Commons Institute.
"Amendment to Statement of Issues in Damages Reference Allowed in Part to Narrow Existing Plea", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2014.
Christopher Heer speaks on "Advising Your Client on IP Remedies Before the Case Starts" at a program entitled "Advanced Sessions in Patents and Trademark Law" offered by The Commons Institute in downtown Toronto.
"Court Refuses to Overturn Commissioner’s Refusal of Subway Video Monitor Patent Application as Obvious", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q3 2014.
"Judicial Review in Patent Conflict Proceeding Dismissed", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q2 2014.
"Expandable and Contractible Garden Hose Patent Found Obvious In View of Aircraft Gas Mask Hose", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q2 2014.
"Non-Practicing Entities in Canada", Intellectual Property Newsletter, Federated Press, Volume XIX, No. 2, 2014.
"350k in Party-and-Party Costs Awarded in Patent Action – ABB Technology AG v. Hyundai Heavy Industries Co. Ltd.", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2013.
Christopher Heer presents “Patent Law and Data Protection” as a guest speaker at the Intellectual Property Law Course in the Health Law LLM Program offered by Osgoode Hall Law School.
"Unanswered Request to Admit Insufficient Evidence to Support Default Judgment Motion – Monsanto Canada v. Verdegem", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q1 2013.
"Impeachment Action Continues against Expired Patent – Apotex v. Warner- Lambert Company LLC", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2012.
"Bancorp Services LLC v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (US)", E-commerce Law Reports, Volume 12, Issue 6  ECLR 1-24.
"The Value Proposition for Canadian Patents", online: Mondaq <http://www.mondaq.com/canada/x/202898/Patent/The+Value+Proposition+for+Canadian+Patents>.
"Canadian Patent Prosecution Tips for the U.S. Patent Practitioner", online: Mondaq <http://www.mondaq.com/canada/x/195632/Patent/Canadian+Patent+Prosecution+Tips+For+The+US+Patent+Practitioner>.
"Top to Bottom Variant Has Material Effect on Way Invention Works – Hollick Solar Systems Limited v. Matrix Energy", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q2 2012.
Christopher Heer will be on hand as a mentor at the Mobile Experience Innovation Centre's (MEIC) Mobile App Camp 2012, which takes place August 24-26 at Corus Quay in Toronto. The Mobile App Camp provides mobile and interactive digital media professionals with the opportunity to work in multi-disciplinary teams to brainstorm and develop new mobile app concepts.
"Patent Eligibility of Computer-Implemented Inventions Further Delineated by U.S. Court", online: Lexology <http://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d424c78c-e8bb-45c7-a0d5-69d7d02d9164>.
"Punitive Damages Granted for Patent Infringement – Eurocopter (Société Par Actions Simplifiée) v. Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q1 2012.
"Mere Restatement of the Claims Is Not a Proper Pleading of Patent Infringement – Bertelsen v. Automated Tank Manufacturing", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2011.
"Section 8 Proceeding Amendment to Add Infringement Defence Denied" – Apotex v. Shire Canada", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2011.
As part of a workshop on business models, Christopher Heer speaks to Mobile Accelerator Program participants on "Protecting and Retaining IP in Mobile Applications". The Mobile Accelerator Program fosters the growth of high potential Ontario start-ups creating new and innovative mobile products and services.
"Business Methods Are Patentable in Canada", William B. Vass and Christopher D. Heer, online: Mondaq <http://www.mondaq.com/canada/x/161864/Patent/Business+Methods+Are+Patentable+In+Canada>.
As part of a seminar on intellectual property held by the Toronto chapter of The Indus Entrepreneurs (TiE Toronto), Christopher Heer speaks on "Obtaining Patents and Avoiding Patent Infringement" in Canada and abroad.
"Allegations Relating to Foreign Litigation Largely Not Permitted in Pleading" - Astrazeneca Canada v. Apotex", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q3 2011.
"Patent Appeal Board Review", Christopher D. Heer and Stéphane G. Lévesque, 27 CIPR 1.
"Infringement Found in at Least One of a Battery of Claims - Valence Technology v. Phostech Lithium", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q1 2011.
"The Effective Use of Patent Searches and Opinions", online: Mondaq <http://www.mondaq.com/canada/x/141230/Patent/The+Effective+Use+Of+Patent+Searches+And+Opinions>.
"Amazon.com Appeal on Patentable Subject Matter Heard by Federal Court of Appeal", online: Mondaq <http://www.mondaq.com/canada/x/136808/Patent/AmazonCom+Appeal+On+Patentable+Subject+Matter+Heard+By+Federal+Court+Of+Appeal>.
"Expert Report from Patent Examiner Deemed Inadmissible - Eurocopter (société par actions simplifiée) v. Bell Helicopter Textron Canada Limitée", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2010.
"Business Methods Not Excluded from Patentability - Amazon.com v. Canada (Attorney General)", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2010.
"Failure to Consider Essential Elements Leads to Reversal of Obviousness Finding - Bridgeview Manufacturing v. 931409 Alberta Ltd. (Central Alberta Hay Centre)", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q3 2010.
Disclaimer Invalid Due to New, Inventive Elements Broadening Claims - Hershkovitz v. Tyco Safety Products Canada Ltd.", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q3 2010.
Barbara Murchie and Christopher Heer, "The Duty of Good Faith in Patent Prosecution: Where Will It Arise Next?” 9th Annual Forum on Pharma Patents, The Canadian Institute.
"An Injunction Restraining the Sale and Distribution of Infringing Products Is Not Limited to the Products at Issue at Trial - Weatherford Canada Ltd. v. Corlac", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q2 2010.
"Successful Appeal of the Granting of a Bifurcation Order - Garford Pty Ltd. v. Dywidag Systems International, Canada, Ltd.", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q2 2010.
William B. Vass and Christopher D. Heer, "Business Methods Not Excluded from Patentability ", online: Mondaq <http://www.mondaq.com/canada/x/105900/Patent/Business+Methods+Not+Excluded+from+Patentability+US+Supreme+Court+in+Bilski>.
"Early Trial Initiative Requires an Efficient Discovery Process - Apotex v. Sanofi- Aventis", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q1 2010.
"Proposed Intervention Fails to Bring a Perspective to the Proceedings Different from That of the Parties - Pfizer Limited v. Ratiopharm", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2009.
"New Evidence on Appeal Must Be in the Interests of Justice - Pfizer Limited v. Ratiopharm", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2009.
"Invalidity Allegations with Respect to Controlled Release Oxycodone Compositions Patent Found Not Justified - Purdue Pharma v. Pharmascience", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q3 2009.
"Invalidity Arguments May Be Raised on Appeal as a Defence to Patent Infringement Without a Cross-Appeal - Johnson & Johnson v. Boston Scientific Ltd.", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q2 2009.
"Partial Disclosure Fails to Amount to an Implied Waiver of Privilege - Merck v. Apotex", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q1 2009.
"Courts Ought to Intervene in Assessments of Costs Only in the Plainest of Cases - Apotex v. Merck", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2008.
"Venue of Long Trials Subject to Court's Availability/No Absolute Right to Rebuttal Expert Reports - Bristol-Myers Squibb v. Apotex", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q3 2008.
Christopher Heer and Ronald E. Dimock, "Patents" chapter in Canadian Forms & Precedents - Information Technology & Entertainment, looseleaf, 2005-2008.
"Improper Conduct as a Defence to a Claim of Equitable Relief in a Patent Infringement Action - Apotex v. Sanofi-Aventis Canada", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q2 2008.
"Appeal of a Patent Re-examination Board Decision - Genencor International v. Canada (Commissioner of Patents)", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q2 2008.
"Relief from the Implied Undertaking Rule - Sanofi-Aventis Canada v. Apotex", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q1 2008.
"Additional Case Law May Be Argued on an Appeal of a Prothonotary, but at a Price - J2 Global Communications v. Protus IP Solutions", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q1 2008.
"Question of Mootness Is Not ‘Plain and Obvious' - Hässle v. Apotex", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q1 2008.
"Proper Pleading of Claims Broader and Bad Faith - Bayer Healthcare AG v. Sandoz Canada", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2007.
"Apotex Gets Up to 15 Expert Witnesses - Eli Lilly v. Apotex", CBA IP Quarterly Case Summaries, Q4 2007.
Christopher Heer, "Employees and Trade Secrets: How the Concept of Inevitable Disclosure May Fit into Canadian Law", 19 IPJ 323, April 2006.
Christopher Heer and Ronald E. Dimock, "Recent Developments in Patent Law", for the 4th Annual Drug Patents Conference, March 2005.
Christopher Heer, "Follow the Leader: Software Patents with Inadequate Disclosure at the Canadian Patent Office", 62 UTFLR 85, Winter 2004.
Book Review, Christopher Heer, Michael Hong and Jason J. Kee,"Intellectual Property Disputes: Resolutions and Remedies by Ronald E. Dimock, Ed.", 62 UTFLR 93, Winter 2004.
Christopher Heer, "The Case against Copyright Protection of Non-literal Elements of Computer Software", 18 IPJ 1, May 2004.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.