Source: http://texas-opinions.com/law-finality-of-order-deadline-to-file-notice-of-appeal.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 15:56:07+00:00

Document:
The appellate timetable does not begin to run until a written order is signed. Farmer v. Ben E.
WL 439052, at *1 (Tex.App.--Fort Worth Feb. 8, 2007, no pet.) (mem.opin.).
jurisdiction."). Appellant's motion to proceed with only one copy of the brief is denied as moot.
Appellate jurisdiction is never presumed. Brashear v. Victoria Gardens of McKinney, L.L.C., 302 S.
judgment.” Lehmann, 39 S.W.3d at 200.
interlocutory order and not a final judgment. Humphreys v. Caldwell, 888 S.W.2d 469, 470 (Tex.
parties is not immediately appealable, except in narrow situations expressly authorized by statute.
appealed on an interlocutory basis, and is strictly construed. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN.
resolution of the case. TEX. CIV. PRAC. & REM. CODE ANN. § 51.014(d).
141 S.W.3d 158, 164 (Tex. 2004); Brown v. Todd, 53 S.W.3d 297, 306 (Tex. 2001).
nonsuit or the order denying sanctions triggered the thirty day filing period. See id.
determining the last claim is final.” Id. at 200.
sentence and inserted, by hand, “as to Def[endant] Frances B. Crites only,” without mentioning Dr.
sanctions thirty-six days after signing the order of nonsuit.
contain specific language denying or granting relief.
entered, and only at that point did the case become appealable. Id. at 200; see also Villafani v.
days after the order denying sanctions, was timely.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 51
 v. 
 v.