Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/100310.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 02:47:32+00:00

Document:
NATIONAL WESTERN: Agrees to Settle California Suit for $17 Mil.
numerous insurance brokers and insurance companies.
insurance bids and seeks damages in an unspecified amount.
Case Statement Pursuant to Local Rule 16.1(B)(4).
Third Circuit, and a hearing was held in April 2009.
defendants to purchase such insurance coverage in the future.
assess the lawsuit's chances of success.
A copy of the Complaint in Melvin v. Chattem, Inc., Case No.
In Appeal of Silvio F. and Elizabeth O. D'Ignazio, No. 1366 C.D.
as a result of a radiation overdose.
radiation for cancer treatment between 2004 and 2009.
much as 50 percent more radiation than prescribed on average.
securities on August 9, 2004.
deny, the allegations against them.
respect of the settlement of the U.S. Action.
Approval Notice. The deadline to opt-out was January 8, 2010.
telephone, toll free, at 1-800-461-6166 ext. 2380.
and can be reached by telephone at 1-418-694-2009.
to the company's Feb. 22, 2010, Form 10-K filing with the U.S.
actions regarding our BLA for Provenge.
filed a motion to dismiss the complaint.
allowing plaintiffs thirty days to file an amended complaint.
sale of Dendreon stock, and denied the remainder of the motion.
complaint on Jan. 5, 2009.
complaint, and allowing leave to amend.
Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint on June 8, 2009.
disclosures on July 22, 2009.
Trial in this action has been set for Oct. 18, 2010.
asymptomatic, metastatic, androgen-independent prostate cancer.
the performance of oral surgical procedures.
Court of Appeals decision with the California Supreme Court.
products for the dental market.
Goldman as a named class representative.
dentists located in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
which the company has filed its response.
standing, which Motion was recently granted by the Court.
al., Case No. 2:06-cv-05439-RBS," (E.D. Penn.) (Barclay, J.).
Appeals for the Third Circuit, according to the company's Feb.
purchased Trubyte teeth or products containing Trubyte teeth.
Third Circuit's decision, but the request was denied.
dealers, leaving only the resale price maintenance claim.
company is awaiting a decision.
have been categorized as "non-exempt" rather than "exempt"
fees. The suit was filed Nov. 14, 2006.
Southern District of Indiana in August 2007.
elected to participate in the lawsuit.
collective action should not be decertified within 30 days.
other matters have been stayed pending a ruling on these issues.
company's Feb. 22, 2010, Form 10-K filing with the U.S.
meal breaks under California law.
Zyprexa, treble damages, punitive damages, and attorneys' fees.
the appeal in December 2009, no opinions have been rendered.
the product liability litigation pending in the U.S.
lawsuit, Broadbased Equities v. Keith Olsen, et al. (Case No.
potential suitors from making competing offers.
upon the terms of a settlement of all lawsuits.
actions pending in the Delaware Chancery Court and the U.S.
York-4 IBX data center in Secaucus, New Jersey.
million they had collectively invested with and lost from Ms.
"launder" the millions of dollars she stole from her victims.
prosecutors said was a Ponzi scheme.
A nationwide settlement has been reached in Marsikyan, et al. v.
to water damage from a clogged reed valve.
enter into a settlement in order to avoid protracted litigation.
drug giants Merck and Schering-Plough.
hearing is set for March 24.
Metuchen, N.J., solo Mark Silber, Esq., who represents Mr.
would not be eligible to apply for fees, says Mr. Silber.
switched their allegiance," says Mr. Silber.
growth in sales and earnings.
fiduciary duty to stockholders when they approved the merger.
stock and $10.50 in cash for each Schering-Plough share.
the merger to be stopped, or set aside if it were consummated.
stockholders voted on the deal.
on Schering-Plough's joint venture relating to the drug Remicade.
disclosures are listed in an exhibit to the settlement agreement.
support" shortly after the merger.
in New Jersey is choked to death with frivolous litigation.
though Class Counsel virtually concedes it is going nowhere," Mr.
good and their oath of office."
in writing to the court."
principle of the shareholder franchise," Mr. Cecchi says.
spokesman Ronald Rogers declines to comment.
to the company's Feb. 22, 2010, Form 8-K filing with the U.S.
scheduled to be reported on or before March 16, 2010.
equity of $1.1 billion, as of September 30, 2009.
States upon applications submitted by independent contractors.
company's demurrer and granted leave to amend.
Plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on Sept. 11, 2009.
On Dec. 18, 2009, the Court dismissed the action.
company's Feb. 22, 2010, 2009, Form 10-K filing with the U.S.
subscribers since 2006, residing in the United States."
connection with the "Netflix Prize" contest.
punitive damages; disgorgement of profits; and injunctive relief.
prices allowing Wal-Mart to overcharge for DVD sales.
Mart, were also named as defendants in these suits.
district courts around the country.
States, which resulted in higher Netflix subscription prices.
attorneys' fees, and damages in an unspecified amount.
subscribers have been related to MDL-2029.
1, 2010 to file an amended complaint.
Natural plugging its product as "Smart Gummies for Smart Kids,"
with misleading claims about their nutritional value.
finalized by the end of the first quarter of 2010.
2009, and an amended complaint was filed on June 19, 2009.
documents to co-lead plaintiffs in these actions.
State of New York, County of Westchester.
Company were not being used to maximize stockholder value.
proposal was made and by adopting certain defensive measures.
plaintiff failed to file a timely opposition to the Motion.
complaint, adding as defendants PepsiCo, Mr. Compton and Ms.
entirely fair to the public stockholders of the company.
conferred with co-lead counsel in the Delaware Lawsuit.
voluntarily stayed pending resolution of the Delaware Lawsuits.
entered into the Settlement Stipulation.
County action pending resolution of the Delaware Lawsuits.
to resolve all of these actions.
notice to the company's shareholders.
Electropura, e-puramr and Garci Crespo.
by denying Douglas J. Morgan's motion for class certification.
prior employment as a detention deputy for the sheriff's office.
concluded that in making these findings, the circuit court erred.
Richard C. McCrea, Jr., Esq.
regarding whether to join a union.
Decertification of the class was denied on Aug. 29, 2007.
decision on similar facts in Brinker Restaurant Corporation v.
Superior Court, RadioShack again sought class decertification.
the trial court granted RadioShack's second motion.
The plaintiffs in Brookler have appealed this ruling.
the California Appellate court's decision in Brinker.
settle the purported class action lawsuit Richard Stuart v.
RadioShack Corporation, et al., according to the company's Feb.
tentative settlement of the lawsuit subject to court approval.
filing a Motion for Preliminary Approval.
disclose material facts relating to the activities of the Funds.
lawsuit to include more plaintiffs.
expand the plaintiff class beyond the two women.
commenced between December 2009 and January 2010.
backed commercial paper conduits program.
United States equity and fixed-income strategies.
a class of purchasers of Steel Dynamics common stock between Jan.
26, 2009 and March 11, 2009.
dismissal. Plaintiffs did not appeal.
transportation, and brokerage and trading products and services.
them likewise seeking similar class certification.
between Jan. 1, 2005 and the present.
Joint Motion to Dismiss all of the direct purchaser lawsuits.
On June 12, 2009, however, the Court denied the Motion.
to themselves instead of maximizing stockholder value.
aided and abetted the alleged breaches of duty by our directors.
an injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger.
costs will not be deducted from the Merger consideration.
an insurance receivable of $400,000.
and Data to connect to customers and exchange Internet traffic.
the world's first commercial Internet exchange.
the company between Feb. 8, 2007 and Nov. 8, 2007.
settle the consolidated class action lawsuit.
hearing on final approval on June 11, 2010.
The case is Uman v. Warner Home Video, et al., Case No.
messages come from friends, according to a federal class action.
allegations "are based on falsehoods."
the users' contacts who are not WooMe subscribers.
explicitly refused to provide it with his email password.
it tells you what friends are on the social network."
people's email address books without their knowledge or consent.
sending emails in their names.
The named defendants are Woo Media and Stephen Stokols.
violations, unfair competition and unjust enrichment.
from malicious reviews from competitors."
plaintiff, Cats and Dogs Animal Hospital Inc. of Long Beach.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v.

 v.