Source: https://www.stoel.com/people/taryn-k-williams
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 08:55:10+00:00

Document:
Taryn Williams is Of Counsel in the firm’s Litigation group. She represents clients in complex business litigation including unfair competition, trade secret, antitrust, contract disputes, and class actions, and in actions brought by state agencies, including allegations of violations of consumer protection statutes. Taryn also has substantial experience in intellectual property matters, including patent and trademark litigation in both federal and state courts, and before the U.S. International Trade Commission in trade remedy action brought under section 337 of the Tariff Act. She has represented clients in a wide variety of technologies, including semiconductor, automotive, telecommunications, and consumer electronics products.
Obtained favorable results in unlawful trade practices enforcement actions brought by Attorneys General in multiple states against the maker of 5-hour ENERGY®. Obtained complete defense verdict after three-week trial in action brought by the Oregon Attorney General alleging violations of Oregon’s Unlawful Trade Practices Act. Prevailed on significant claims following three-week trial in action brought by the Washington Attorney General alleging violations of the Washington Consumer Protection Act.
Certain Integrated Transporters, Components Thereof, and Manuals Therefor, Inv. No 337-TA-935- represented Respondents PowerUnion (Beijing) Technology Co., Ltd.; Ninebot (Tianjin) Technology Co.; Ltd.; and Ninebot, Inc.
Certain Wireless Devices, Including Mobile Phones and Tablets II, Inv. No. 337-TA-905- represented Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corp.
Certain Integrated Circuit Devices and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-873- represented Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corp.
Certain Mobile Handset Devices and Related Touch Keyboard Software, Inv. No. 337-TA-864- represented Personal Communications Devices.
Lake Cherokee Hard Drive Technologies, LLC v. MediaTek USA, Inc. (E.D. Tex.)- Plaintiff dismissed all claims with prejudice against represented defendant Hewlett Packard Company in patent litigation involving error correction codes for optical disks.
Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc. v. Schrader Electronics, Inc. (E.D. Mich.)- achieved favorable settlement on behalf of Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc. in patent infringement litigation involving tire pressure monitoring systems.
Schrader-Bridgeport International, Inc. v. Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc. (W.D. V.A.; E.D. Mich.)- achieved favorable settlement on behalf of Continental Automotive Systems US, Inc. in patent infringement litigation involving tire pressure monitoring systems.
Certain CMOS Image Sensors and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-846- represented Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corp.
Certain Portable Communication Devices, Inv. No. 337-TA-827- represented Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corp.
Certain Electronic Devices with Image Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software, Inv. No. 337-TA-724- represented Advanced Micro Devices.
Certain Personal Data and Mobile Communications Devices and Related Software, Inv. No. 337-TA-710- represented Nokia Inc. and Nokia Corp.
Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors and Products Containing the Same, Including Memory Modules, Inv. No. 337-TA-707- represented Infineon AG.
Certain Semiconductor Integrated Circuits and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-65- represented Qimonda AG.
Certain Flash Memory Chips and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-664- represented Spansion, Inc.
Certain Semiconductor Integrated Circuits Using Tungsten Metallization and Products Containing Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-648- represented Qimonda AG.
Certain Nitrile Gloves, Inv. No. 337-TA-608- represented Tillotson Corporation.
Certain Semiconductor Chips with Minimized Chip Package Size and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-605- represented Broadcom Corporation.
Certain Lighting Products, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same, Inv. No. 337-TA-594- represented Cooper Lighting.
Ashley Furniture Indus., Inc. v. Int'l Trade Comm'n.734 F.3d 1306 (Fed. Cir. 2014)- represented the American Furniture Manufacturers' Committee for Legal Trade in successful defense of the constitutionality of the Continues Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act.
Interdigital Comm'n, LLC v. Int'l Trade Comm'n, 707 F.3d 1295 (Fed. Cir. 2013)- represented Hewlett Packard Company in amicus brief in support of appellant on Section 337 domestic industry issue.
SFK USA, Inc. v. United States, 556 F.3d 1337 (Fed. Cir. 2009)- represented the American Furniture Manufacturers' Committee in successful defense of the constitutionality of the Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act.
PSC-VSMPO-Avisma v. United States, 688 F.3d 751 (Fed. Cir. 2012)- represented US Magnesium in an appeal that reversed the U.S. Court of International Trade's antidumping decision on a cost accounting issue.
GPX Int'l Tire Corp. v. United States, 688 F.3d 732 (Fed. Cir. 2011)- represented Bridgestone Tire in challenge to the application of the countervailing duty law to non-market-economy countries.
Pro Bono representation of Virginia death row inmate in a habeas corpus challenge to his death sentence based on ineffective assistance of counsel, which included presenting the testimony of multiple witness in an evidentiary hearing in federal district court.
"A Surge in Trade Secret Misappropriation Cases at the ITC," Law360, Feb. 1, 2013.
"The Current Outlook for Patent Litigation for 2009," Institute of Continuing Legal Education, The 14th Annual Intellectual Property Law Institute, Los Cabos, Mexico, Nov. 13, 2008.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.