Source: http://halakhah.com/shabbath/shabbath_139.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 01:56:52+00:00

Document:
R. Eleazar b. Melai said in the name of Resh Lakish: What is meant by the verse, For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue muttereth wickedness?20 'For your hands are defiled with blood': this refers to the judges: 'and your fingers with iniquity', to the judges' scribes;21 'your lips have spoken lies' to the advocates of the judges;22 'your tongue muttereth wickedness' — to the litigants.
R. Melai also said: As a reward for, and when he seeth thee, he shall be glad in his heart,28 he was privileged to wear the breastplate of judgment upon his heart.
The citizens of Bashkar29 sent [a question] to Levi: What about [setting up] a canopy [on the Sabbath]; what about cuscuta in a vineyard?30 what about a dead man on a Festival?31 By the time he [the messenger] arrived [at Levi's home] Levi had died. Said Samuel to R. Menashia, If you are wise, send them [an answer]. [So] he sent [word] to them: 'As for a canopy, we have examined it from all aspects and do not find any aspect by which it can be permitted'. But let him send them [a permissive ruling] in accordance with Rami b. Ezekiel?32 [He did not do this] because they were not learned in the law.33 'Cuscuta in a vineyard is a [forbidden] mixture'. But let him send them [a reply] in accordance with R. Tarfon. For it was taught: As for cuscuta, R. Tarfon maintains: It is not kil'ayim34 in a vineyard; while the Sages rule: It is kil'ayim in a vineyard. And it is an established principle: The view of him, who is lenient in respect to Palestine,35 is halachah without Palestine? — [Likewise] because they were not learnt in the law. Rab announced: He who wishes to sow cuscuta in a vineyard, let him sow.36 R. Amram the pious would ban [a person] for this. R. Mesharsheya would give a perutah37 to a Gentile child to sow it for him.38 Then let him give it to an Israelite child? — He would come to adhere [to this practice when he grew up]. Then let him give it to an adult Gentile? … He might come to substitute an Israelite for him.
I.e., an absolute and definite ruling. completely intelligible and not subject to controversy.
Lit., 'in one place'. I.e., in any of the places whither they shall wander (Maharsha).
This phrase is now liturgical.
Lit., 'which is in their hand'.
I.e., through the exercise of righteousness.
The Guebres, who caused the Jews much suffering under the Sassanians, cf. Sanh., Sonc. ed., p 504, n. 6.
Deriving [H] from [H], great, haughty.
They support their underlings in evil; or, support them in their refusal to summon the defendant to court or to enforce the court verdict unless they are well-paid for it (Rashi).
I.e., unfit judges appointed by the scholars of their family.
[H]. Probably laws concerning communal matters, the imposts of levies for communal and charitable purposes v. Herzog, The Main Institutions of Jewish Law. Vol. 1, XXIII.
Rashi: the judges being appointed in reliance that these scholars would guide them in law, whereas they subsequently act of their own accord in many cases.
Rashi: who instruct the litigants how to plead. V, Aboth, Sonc. ed., p. 6, n, 1.
Gen. XLIX, 26. E.V.: 'of him that was separate from his brethren'. A nazirite is forbidden wine, Num. VI, 2-3.
R. Melai: why does he omit the brothers?
Lit., 'no drunkenness'. During the period of separation.
On the part of the brothers.
Ex. IV, 14 — the reference is to Aaron.
Caskar, the chief town in the Mesene region. on the right bank of the old Tigris; directly opposite, on the left bank, lay Wasit, and the two are to some extent identified; v. Obermeyer. pp. 91-3.
Does it infringe the prohibition against divers plants being sown together? v. Deut. XXII, 9.
What arrangements are permissible for handling him, the funeral, etc.
Who permits its spreading when it is furnished with cords, v. supra 138a.
They would go still further.
Lit., 'the land' par excellence.
V. Halevy. Doroth, I, 3, p. 137 ([H]).
He agreed with Rab, nevertheless he did it in an unusual manner, so as not to encourage laxity.
Though the second is only a Rabbinical institution.
though I do not know whether it preceded or followed it,1 and when they went before R. Johanan, he said to them: Let Gentiles occupy themselves with him [the dead]. Raba too said: As for a corpse,2 on the first day of Festivals Gentiles should occupy themselves with him; on the second day of Festivals Israelites may occupy themselves with him, and even on the second day of New Year, which is not so in the case of an egg?3 [Here too] because they were not learned in the law.
R. Abin b. R. Huna said in R. Hama b. Guria's name: A man may wrap himself in a canopy sheet and [tie it] with its cords to go out into the street on the Sabbath without fear.4 How does this differ from R. Huna's [dictum]. for R. Huna said in Rab's name: If one goes out on the Sabbath wearing a garment not provided with [proper] fringes as required by law, he is liable to a sin-offering?5 — Fringes are important in relation to the cloak, hence they are not merged [therein]; these are not of [separate] importance, and [so] are accounted as nought.
MISHNAH. WATER MAY BE POURED OVER LEES IN ORDER TO CLARIFY THEM, AND WINE MAY BE STRAINED THROUGH CLOTHS AND THROUGH A BASKET MADE OF PALM TWIGS; AND AN EGG MAY BE PASSED THROUGH A MUSTARD STRAINER;17 AND ENOMLIN18 MAY BE PREPARED ON THE SABBATH. R. JUDAH SAID: ON THE SABBATH [IT MAY ONLY BE MADE] IN A GOBLET; ON FESTIVALS, IN A LAGIN;19 AND ON THE INTERMEDIATE DAYS OF FESTIVALS IN A BARREL. R. ZADOK SAID: IT ALL DEPENDS ON THE [NUMBER OF] GUESTS.
I.e., whether the Festival fell on Friday on which day the death occurred, so that it had to be buried on the same day, or whether it fell on Sunday and the death occurred on the Sabbath, so that the burial could not be delayed any longer.
Of a person who died on a Sabbath which was followed by a Festival.
An egg laid on the first day of any Festival except New Year may be eaten on the second day too. But in respect to a corpse New Year is the same as other Festivals.
The garment has fringes. but since they are not in accordance with the law they are regarded not as part thereof but as a burden which entails a sin offering. Thus here too, since the normal function of the cords is to spread the sheet, not to tie it round a person, they constitute a burden.
Lit., to suspend pomegranates therein, but he suspends lees therein.
I.e., the intermediate days of Passover and Tabernacles, which enjoy semi-sanctity, being treated as profane in some respects and as holy in others.
The evasion is not obvious, for a person who sees him brew beer does not know that he has sufficient already for the festival.
That he is evading the law, unless he actually puts pomegranates in it, since its usual function is to strain them.
Jast. R. Han.: a head of garlic.
But actually it was to prevent the wine from running out, and thus he repaired the barrel, as it were.
For even if he did these without an artifice he would only violate a Rabbinical, not a Scriptural interdict.
Without an artifice — hence he does nothing wrong.
Rashi: the strainer contains mustard, and when the egg is poured upon it the yolk passes through and the white remains on top. R. Halevi (quoted by Rash): the egg is strained into a dish, not into mustard, but a mustard strainer is specified in order that the action on the Sabbath, though permitted, shall be done differently from what it is on weekdays.
Larger than a goblet ([H]) but smaller than a barrel ([H]).
Though the liquid is turbid through the stirring.
All wine is turbid then and drunk thus; hence it is not made fit for drinking (which would be forbidden on the Sabbath) by being put through the strainer.
Which receives the wine. Otherwise it forms a 'tent', v. p. 694, n. 1.
In the latter case a 'tent' is made.
I.e., a jug used for taking wine out of a cask; the chips act as a strainer.
So as to leave the sediment behind.
The last drops percolating through the dregs left behind in the first vessel, which shows that their purpose was to strain the wine.
He was a beer brewer (B.M. 65b) and could afford to throw away the little wine left at the bottom together with the chips, thus leaving nothing at all there to show their real motive.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 

V. 
 v.