Source: https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-williams-1702
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 12:21:21+00:00

Document:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. LARRY SINCLAIR WILLIAMS, Defendant - Appellant.
Larry Sinclair Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Joseph Leiser, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Larry Sinclair Williams appeals the district court's order dismissing his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion for reconsideration of the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion and denying his motions for a reduction of his sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2012), and for correction of clerical error under Fed. R. Crim. P. 36.
28 U.S.C. § 2255(h). Williams' claims do not satisfy either of these criteria. Therefore, we deny authorization to file a successive § 2255 motion and affirm.
Our review of the district court's denial of Williams' § 3582 motion and Rule 36 relief reveals no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court's order. United States v. Williams, Nos. 1:92-cr-00083-AVB-1; 1:08-cv-00722-CMH (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

References: v. 
 § 2255
 § 3582
 § 2255
 § 2255
 § 3582
 v.