Source: https://vi.scribd.com/document/396464727/Data-Scape-Sues-Apple-Dec-2018-for-Patent-Infringement
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 20:03:35+00:00

Document:
Apple is being sued for patent infringement by Data Scape Limited of Ireland, who has 4 shareholders. As small as they are, they acquired 5 Sony patents solely for the purposes of suing Apple.
Blazek Glass s.r.o. et. al. v. Top Notch Wellness Company et. al.
Pps Data v. RDM Payment Solutions et. al.
Employment Law Compliance. v. Empower Software Solutions Et. Al.
4 located at Office 115, 4-5 Burton Hall Road, Sandyford, Dublin 18, Ireland.
9 presence in Hollywood, where it employs at least dozens of employees.
17 818 W. Seventh Street, Suite 930, Los Angeles, California, 90017.
21 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338(a).
28 offering to sell and selling products and/or services that infringe the asserted patents.
5 established place(s) of business in the District, as set forth above.
9 as if fully set forth herein.
10 7. Data Scape is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No.
14 correct copy of the ’929 Patent is included as Exhibit A.
15 Instrumentalities to Apple’s customers.
21 and contribute to the infringement of the claims of the ‘929 Patent.
23 ordinary and customary fashion results in infringement of the claims of the ‘929 Patent.
13 Instrumentalities with compatible systems will result in infringement of the ’929 Patent.
14 currently is, contributorily infringing the ‘929 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
15 14. The Accused Instrumentalities include a system for communicating data.
28 MacBook include storage and are an examples of a first storage medium.
19 inducing infringement and contributory infringement.
4 invention by Apple, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
8 as if fully set forth herein.
9 26. Data Scape is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No.
13 correct copy of the ’751 Patent is included as Exhibit B.
11 support and repair services for the Accused Instrumentalities to Apple’s customers.
19 ordinary and customary fashion results in infringement of the claims of the ‘751 Patent.
9 the ‘751Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
26 when the detection indicates that the apparatus and the external apparatus are connected.
5 ‘751 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
6 33. The Accused Instrumentalities perform a method of communicating data.
1 dependent the apparatus (e.g. iOS device) being connected to the external device (e.g.
28 inducing infringement and contributory infringement.
12 invention by Apple, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
16 as if fully set forth herein.
17 43. Data Scape is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No.
21 true and correct copy of the ’469 Patent is included as Exhibit C.
14 found within the second management data recorded on the second recording medium.
18 for the Accused Instrumentalities to Apple’s customers.
24 actively induce and contribute to the infringement of the claims of the ‘469 Patent.
26 ordinary and customary fashion results in infringement of the claims of the ‘469 Patent.
15 the ‘469 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
6 unusual, far-fetched, illusory, impractical, occasional, aberrant, or experimental.
10 of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
2 on which data received by the iCloud Drive can be written.
27 the iCloud drive will record data received by the iPhone into memory contained therein.
8 synced with data on the iCloud Drive and iPhone.
5 inducing infringement and contributory infringement.
17 invention by Apple, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
21 as if fully set forth herein.
22 60. Data Scape is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No.
26 correct copy of the ’ 537 Patent is included as Exhibit D.
2 and contribute to the infringement of the claims of the ‘537 Patent.
4 ordinary and customary fashion results in infringement of the claims of the ‘537 Patent.
2 Instrumentalities with compatible systems will result in infringement of the ’537 Patent.
27 infringing the ‘537 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
5 iPad or iPod touch (e.g. a second apparatus).
17 iPad, or iPod touch if it determines that the devices are connected.
2 found in the playlist of the iOS device.
2 associated device the next time they sync.
11 inducing infringement and contributory infringement.
22 infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use.
26 as if fully set forth herein.
27 78. Data Scape is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No.
3 correct copy of the ’112 Patent is included as Exhibit E.
3 for the Accused Instrumentalities to Apple’s customers.
9 and contribute to the infringement of the claims of the ‘112 Patent.
6 Instrumentalities with compatible systems will result in infringement of the ’112 Patent.
7 ‘112 patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
12 apparatus) to the iPhone, iPad or iPod touch.
2 will display an identifier associated with the device.
22 that device to playlists stored on the MacBook to determine if the two are identical.
2 are not found in the playlist of the portable device.
2 display an identifier associated with the device.
16 inducing infringement and contributory infringement.
27 infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use.
96. Data Scape is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No.
correct copy of the ’614 Patent is included as Exhibit F.
18 Accused Instrumentalities to Apple’s customers.
24 and contribute to the infringement of the claims of the ‘614 Patent.
26 ordinary and customary fashion results in infringement of the claims of the ‘929 Patent.
4 violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
8 the Accused Instrumentality constitutes contributory infringement of the ’614 Patent.
10 in violation of 35 U.S.C. § 271(c).
18 predetermined identifier.” For example, when external reproduction apparatus (e.g.
2 associated with that device along with Playlists associated with that device.
2 playlists found in the MacBook with corresponding playlists found in the iOS devices.
2 whether there are additional files in the playlist of the MacBook.
2 MacBook that are not present in the iOS devices.
2 through inducing infringement and contributory infringement.
5 the ’ 614 Patent.
13 infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use.
18 Patent, the ’537 Patent, the ’112 Patent, and the ’614 Patent.
21 the ’112 Patent, and the ’614 Patent.
8 by jury of any issues so triable by right.
Patent Enforcement Group v. Chassis Tech et. al.
MacNeil Automotive Products v. Kramer America et. al.
Cellport Systems v. HTC et. al.
Phoenix Licensing et. al. v. Wells Fargo & Company et. al.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 271
 § 271
 § 271
 § 271
 § 271
 § 271
 § 271
 § 271
 § 271
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.