Source: https://vacode.org/18.2-60/
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 16:21:02+00:00

Document:
§ 18.2-60 Threats of death or bodily injury to a person or . . .
1. Any person who knowingly communicates, in a writing, including an electronically transmitted communication producing a visual or electronic message, a threat to kill or do bodily injury to a person, regarding that person or any member of his family, and the threat places such person in reasonable apprehension of death or bodily injury to himself or his family member, is guilty of a Class 6 felony. However, any person who violates this subsection with the intent to commit an act of terrorism as defined in § 18.2-46.4 is guilty of a Class 5 felony.
2. Any person who communicates a threat, in a writing, including an electronically transmitted communication producing a visual or electronic message, to kill or do bodily harm, (i) on the grounds or premises of any elementary, middle or secondary school property, (ii) at any elementary, middle or secondary school-sponsored event or (iii) on a school bus to any person or persons, regardless of whether the person who is the object of the threat actually receives the threat, and the threat would place the person who is the object of the threat in reasonable apprehension of death or bodily harm, is guilty of a Class 6 felony.
B. Any person who orally makes a threat to any employee of any elementary, middle or secondary school, while on a school bus, on school property or at a school-sponsored activity, to kill or to do bodily injury to such person, is guilty of a Class 1 misdemeanor.A prosecution pursuant to this section may be either in the county, city or town in which the communication was made or received.
Code 1950, § 18.1-257; 1960, c. 358; 1973, c. 118; 1975, cc. 14, 15; 1994, c. 265; 1998, cc. 687, 788; 2001, cc. 644, 653; 2002, cc. 588, 623.
If you’re reading this for anything important, you should double-check its accuracy—read § 18.2-60 on the official Code of Virginia website.
. . . jury trial of stalking in violation of Code § 18.2-60.3 (1992). On appeal, he argues that the . . .
. . . do bodily injury" in violation of Code § 18.2-60, John Henry Dowdy, Jr., was convicted by a . . .
. . . Code § 18.2-60.3. . . .
. . . second offense of stalking. He argues that Code § 18.2-60.3 requires proof that he had actual . . .
. . . injury to that person, in violation of Code § 18.2-60(A). Relying analogously on our use of the . . .
. . . communicating a written threat in violation of Code § 18.2-60(A)(1). Specifically, appellant argues . . .
. . . injury" to such person, a violation of Code § 18.2-60(A). On appeal, he complains that the trial . . .
. . . sending a threatening letter, in violation of Code § 18.2-60(A). On appeal, he contends the trial . . .
. . . criminal offense of stalking is described in Code § . . .
. . . intimidated M.S. by "stalking" her. Cf. Code § 18.2-60.3 (stalking statute). It notes that he . . .

References: § 18
 § 18
 § 18
 § 18
 § 18
 § 18
 § 18
 § 18
 § 18
 § 18
 § 18
 § 18