Source: https://www.beveragelaw.com/booze-rules/tag/Assemblymember+Bocanegra
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 21:03:10+00:00

Document:
- Events may now be conducted by out-of-state distilled spirits shipper’s certificate holders. Note that wholesalers, beer manufacturers, out-of-state wineries and beer manufacturers are still excluded from hosting these events.
- Suppliers may now hold events on licensed hotel premises, except for lobby areas and areas designated as a club, nightclub, or other similar entertainment and alcohol may be purchased directly from the hotel, rather than using a caterer. This is in addition to venues without a permanent retail license.
- The total number of consumers and their guests allowed at an event may be up to 600 people, instead of the previous limitation of 400 people. Event hosts are still restricted to 12 events per calendar year with an attendance of more than 100 people and 24 events per calendar year with attendance of under 100 people.
This opens up areas like hotel restaurants and cafes (and permits hotels to cater these events), as long as the hotel keeps other areas open to the public not attending the event. This is a welcome development for qualified suppliers who were struggling to find venues for their events.
We expect the ABC to issue a trade advisory outlining the changes to this section in the near future. In the meantime, for guidance about the other requirements for conducting these types of events, please see the ABC’s previous trade advisory here.
AB 636 from Assemblymember Hall amends B&P Code § 25503.4, the winemaker’s dinner law, allowing you to add even more signed bottles to your collections. According to the law that went into effect last year (B&P Code § 25502.2), suppliers and their agents may sign bottles at promotional events at off-sale retailers, but the same privilege was not explicitly extended to on-sale locations in the ABC Act (despite winemakers so commonly signing bottles at winemaker’s dinners that many believe the practice was implicitly authorized by the ABC). With AB 636, winegrowers, wine importers and their agents may now also sign bottles at on-sale locations such as a restaurant where a winemaker hosts a winemaker’s dinner (B&P Code § 25503.4). Note that beer and spirits suppliers are not included in this section—the privilege for on-premises bottlesignings is only held by wineries and importers. This will continue to expose the on premise venues that allow celebrities to autograph bottles of cognac, tequila, vodka and other spirits products to regulatory discipline.
AB 933, sponsored by Assemblymembers Skinner and Hall, amends B&P Code § 23363.1 (distilled spirits tastings) and adds § 23363.3 (brandy manufacturer’s tastings). These sections create a limited privilege that enables distilled spirits manufacturers and brandy manufacturers, respectively, to charge consumers for up to six ¼ ounce tastes of the manufacturer’s own products on its licensed premises. Using the tastes at the distillery in cocktails is expressly prohibited. This will create difficulty for distillers who market their products for use in cocktails.
AB 647, sponsored by Assemblymember Chesbro, amends the container labeling requirements for beer containers provided by the consumer to be filled for off-premise consumption (aka “growlers”) by beer manufacturers (also referred to here as breweries), who are more clearly defined by this bill as those who use their facilities and equipment to manufacture beer for commercial purposes. The new law allows consumers to re-use growlers they previously purchased and had filled by one brewery, at different brewery, though each brewery can decide for themselves whether or not to adopt this practice. If the brewery does adopt the practice, it must affix a new label to the growler containing all the mandatory information (brand and type, manufacturer and bottler), and completely obscuring all information related to the first beer that had filled the container (brand/name of manufacturer, etc.).
Assemblymember Bocanegra sponsored AB 779, which permits a beer manufacturer who produces more than 60,000 barrels of beer per year to manufacture cider or perry (pear cider), and sell to any licensee authorized to sell wine. This is interesting, because California regulates cider the same way as wine, as cider is fermented from fruit. California law also limits the alcohol manufacturer to one category of beverage per manufacturing site, meaning before this bill, cider could only be made by winegrower licensees. Now large beer manufacturers with the facilities to make cider can do so, although note that the privilege does not go the other way—cider manufacturers do not now have the privilege to make beer.
This isn’t a legislative update, but we wanted to mention that the ABC has proposed amending Rule 106(d), which currently permits suppliers to furnish alcoholic beverage lists to retailers, up to $25 per unit cost to the supplier. If adopted, the proposed rule will raise the limit to $50 per unit. Comments closed on December 30, 2013, so an update should be coming out soon.
The Wine Institute and Assemblymember Chesbro are sponsoring a bill to update B&P Code § 25503.5 and add § 25503.57 to permit a supplier or its representative and the on-sale retailer to independently advertise a tasting event, and permits a wine and spirits wholesaler to conduct consumer tastings on behalf of the supplier without prior ABC approval. These changes provide more flexibility for who may conduct tastings and enables industry members to advertise more easily to consumers without potentially violating the tied house laws.
We’ll be delving into some of these topics in more detail in future postings, so stay tuned for more Booze Rules in 2014!

References: § 25503
 § 25502
 § 25503
 § 23363
 § 23363
 § 25503
 § 25503