Source: https://klarquist.com/people/salumeh-loesch/
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 10:21:48+00:00

Document:
Salumeh litigates intellectual property matters in federal courts around the country, representing a variety of clients, including Fortune 500 e-commerce and software companies. She has represented both plaintiffs and defendants, and multiple clients in joint defense groups and in large multi-defendant litigations. She has extensive experience managing complex patent litigations, including participating in trials, taking and defending depositions, working with experts, and engaging in settlement negotiations.
Salumeh also represents clients in trademark and copyright infringement suits in federal courts and in trademark opposition and cancellation proceedings before the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board.
Salumeh joined Klarquist as a lateral associate in 2008.
Synopsys v. Mentor Graphics, Case No. 12-cv-06467 (N.D. Cal.): Represented EDA company in competitor patent litigation. Won partial summary judgment of patent invalidity under § 101.
Walker Digital Litigations, Case Nos. 11-313-SLR, 11-315-SLR, 12-140-SLR, 11-cv-369-RGA, 11-cv-990-RGA (D. Del.): Represented Amazon.com, Zappos.com, and Target in patent litigations involving e-commerce technology. Several cases dismissed based on finding that the plaintiff lacked standing. Lack of standing decision affirmed by Federal Circuit.
Purifics v. Puralytics, Oppn. No. 91194706 (TTAB): Prevailed in TTAB argument defending against trademark opposition.
Proxyconn v. Microsoft, Dell, Acer, and HP, Case No. 11-cv-01681 DOC (C.D. Cal.): Patent litigation involving data access in networks. Case stayed pending inter partes review.
University of Washington v. General Electric, Case No. 10-cv-01933 (W.D. Wash.): Patent litigation involving ultrasound technology. Case stayed pending reexamination and then dismissed with prejudice.
Rmail v. PayPal and Amazon.com, Case No. 10-cv-00258-TJW (E.D. Tex.): Patent litigation involving e-commerce technology.
Aristocrat v. IGT, Case No. 06-cv-3717 (N.D. Cal.): Inequitable conduct bench trial in patent litigation involving gaming technology.
Research Corporation Technologies v. Microsoft, Case No. 01-cv-0658 (D. Ariz.): Patent litigation trial involved six asserted patents regarding halftoning technology.
DownUnder Wireless v. Amazon.com, et al., Case No. 09-cv-0365 (E.D. Tex.): Stipulation of dismissal without prejudice in multi-defendant litigation regarding cellular phone technology.
Tobin Family Education & Health Foundation, et al., v. Amazon.com, Case No. 09-cv-0160 (M.D. Fla.): Patent litigation involving e-commerce technology.
Quito Enterprises v. Netflix, et al., Case No. 08-cv-23543 (S.D. Fla.): Represented Hulu, NBC Universal, and News Corp. in a patent litigation involving e-commerce technology.

References: v. 
 § 101
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.