Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US9500186B2/en
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 19:14:09+00:00

Document:
2011-04-20 Assigned to MEDIPACS, INC. reassignment MEDIPACS, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: GERONOV, YORDAN M., BANISTER, MARK, CLARK, RAYMOND, COINER, ERICH, MCWILLIAMS, MARK D., VANVEEN, MARK A.
A polymer actuator component and a polymer actuator assembly, power supply and method of using the activation are described.
This invention was made in part with Government support under contract number 0848528 awarded by the National Science Foundation. The Government may have certain rights in the invention.
The present invention relates to volume changing materials. More particularly, the invention concerns polymeric materials that change volume in response to a pH change. The materials advantageously are employed in activators that may be used, for example, as actuators for pumps for administration of therapeutic liquids and will be described in connection with such utility, although other utilities are contemplated.
Actuators are devices that generate displacement or force for various applications. These can take on many forms such as motors, air cylinders, hydraulic cylinders, and electromagnetic solenoids to name a few. These actuators are utilized for many different applications and have been in use for decades.
A particular class of polymeric based actuators that have been developed are polymer actuators based on elastic epoxy hydrogel polymers. Such activators work by creating ionic imbalances near electrodes using positive or negative electrical charges at an electrode in contact with or in close proximity to the polymer and an ionic species of the electrolyte. By increasing the density or the number of the amine groups, such as secondary and primary amines, an increase in swelling pressure is attained in the hydrogel. This also has an effect on the swelling and deswelling times.
One way of achieving this is by incorporating Polyamidoamine (PAMAM) polyether dendrimers, poly(propylene imine (PPI)-dendrimers, amino functionalized dendrimers, or combinations thereof, as part of the polymer structure. Dendrimers are highly branched and offer superior numbers of polymer linkage points. They also are commercially available with primary amino surface groups and core amino groups. This makes engineering of the hydrogel possible so that specific performance parameters such as the pressure the gel can produce is determined by formula ratios of materials or by controlling the organization, size and number of branches in polymer structure itself. Hydrogel density and porosity is controlled by the amount of amine functionality and molecular weight of the polyether amines. Hydrogel density and porosity is also controlled by amount of polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether and/or by the ratio of H2O or solvent used to polymerize the materials.
A preferred ether for this gel is polyethyleneglycol-dodecylether (polyEGDE), but other ethers also can be used such as cyclohexanedimethanol diglycidyl ether. These ethers produce a very clear and strong hydrogel that reacts hydrophobically to high pH aqueous solutions and swells when exposed to low pH or acidic solutions. Hydrogel density and porosity also can be controlled by adding an amount of oxidizer to the polymer during polymerization. Whether in solution or dry these oxidizers can be further activated chemically electrically or by photons during polymerization to achieve desired properties.
Ionic hydrogel swelling kinetics are achieved by a difference in pH, ions, cations or protons between a solution outside of the hydrogel and a solution inside of the hydrogel or the polymer composition of the hydrogel. These performance characteristics can be controlled several ways. For example, adding acid to the polymer during polymerization creates a hydrogel that has a higher pH swelling property. Hydrogel swelling kinetics also can be controlled by adding salts or alkali solutions to the polymer during polymerization. This is accomplished by chemical, electrical, electrochemical, photo or photochemical excitation of the epoxy polymer or solution that it is hydrated with.
It is possible to create an electro activated polymer (EAP) by hydrating the epoxy hydrogel in an electrolyte, inserting an electrode into the gel, and spacing a second electrode a short distance from the hydrogel and running low amounts of current through the electrodes. For example, epoxy hydrogel swelling may be increased in the region of a platinum electrode using saline as an electrolyte fluid. When the polarity is reversed, the hydrogel will deswell or contract. Control of hydrophobic and hydrophilic properties also can be achieved by these methods.
A challenge with these polymer actuators is to generate forces and strain rates of actuation that are sufficient for pumping fluids.
Another challenge with such polymeric actuators is the generation of gas during operation. Polymeric actuators utilizing electrodes and aqueous electrolytes are particularly advantageous for high efficiency actuation but may hydrolyze out oxygen and hydrogen.
Gases produced in a polymer actuator are undesirable for the effects they may have on charge transfer and the mechanical system. By producing an insulating pocket, a gas bubble will impede charge transfer through the system. This effectively lowers the surface area of the electrode and/or the polymer which reduces the rate of expansion of the polymer. To make matters worse, the gas pocket is variable and unpredictable in size and precise composition, reducing accuracy of any device utilizing a polymeric actuator.
Also, gas expansion may produce an apparent expansion of an actuator that later relaxes due to compression or absorption of the gas. Gas production thus reduces repeatability, predictability, and accuracy of the actuator.
Compounding these consistency problems is the inconsistent adhesion of actuator polymer to a non-reactive substrate. Hydrogels are prone to delamination and typically are not stable in aqueous environments, hindering, for example, thin film characterization and use in aqueous media. Adhesion may require solutions that increase the number of chemicals and process steps leading to increased complexity, and may use chemicals that are not environmentally benign.
There is therefore a need for an actuator that can produce high rates of actuation without the shortcomings of hydrolysis or other gas generation.
There is further a need for a hydrogel actuator that is conveniently adhered to a hydrophobic surface.
Conventional actuators do not meet the full need for such an application. Furthermore state of the art polymer actuators do not isolate and create distinct ionic or pH boundaries of the electrolyte at the anode or cathode side of the electrodes.
Typical electrode materials for polymer actuators are metals, carbons and some conductive polymers. The type of electrode is somewhat dependent on the type of actuator and electrolytic chemistry needed to create the desired response. One drawback to using most metals is that they typically are not stable for both the oxidation and redox reaction at each electrode. Nobel metals such as gold and platinum can be used due to their stability but are very expensive and not practical for industrial type use. Other materials such as carbon and graphite will work but have difficult working mechanical properties making them not practical, and conductive polymers are very limited in their chemical compatibility to other polymers. Another drawback all electrodes have is electrochemical gas generation at the electrode surface interface with the electrolyte. The generation of gas, both in type and volume, is dependent on the polarity of the electrode and the amount of electrical current applied to the electrodes in an actuator or actuator assembly and the electrolyte. Gas creates a significant problem of compressible pressure in closed or sealed actuator systems, and can actually outpace the polymer actuation or volume change thereby creating unreliable results in actuation cycles.
The present invention overcomes the aforesaid and other problems of the prior art. The invention, in one aspect, provides a polymer actuator assembly having an anode and a cathode separated by a porous membrane in an electrolyte, a metal hydride material in contact with the surface of one or more of the electrodes, and a polymeric actuator in contact with the anode or the cathode. The porous membrane acts as a barrier or separator material and eliminates or reduces comingling of the ionic or pH regions, substantially increasing the response, accuracy, time and volume changes of the actuator material, as well as improving the range of electrode materials and configurations of the cathode and anode electrodes within the device.
The electrodes in solution with the porous membrane facilitate modulation of the pH around the polymeric actuator via charges or ionic separation. The electrolyte may be aqueous or nonaqueous. The polymeric actuator may be configured to expand or contract in response to pH or chemical changes in the electrolyte induced by an electrical potential differential in the electrodes.
The actuator assembly may further provide a sealed flexible outer housing enclosure allowing sealed entrance or exit points for the electrodes. In an alternative embodiment, the assembly provides a second polymeric actuator such that each polymeric actuator is adjacent to one of the electrodes and both actuators are configured to expand or contract simultaneously when an electric potential differential is applied to the electrodes.
The polymeric actuator and the electrode in contact with the polymeric actuator may be sealed inside a flexible container or bag made of the same material as the porous membrane with a portion of the electrode exiting the flexible container. The portion of the electrode outside of the flexible container is then insulated from the electrolyte by porous membrane material to facilitate actuation when the electric potential differential is applied to the electrodes. The flexible container or bag, or at least a portion of the flexible container or bag preferably is composed of an elastomeric material. A rigid structure that is pervious to the electrolyte or solution by being, for example, porous, may surround the polymer actuator material, at least in part, to facilitate the direction of actuation.
The surface area of the polymeric actuator exposed to the actuating stimulus may be increased by pulverizing or grinding the polymeric actuator material into smaller particles or particulates. The particulates of the actuating material may then form a slurry with the electrolyte. The particulates may be enclosed in a flexible, porous enclosure with the electrode in contact with the exterior surface of the enclosure, or with the electrode penetrating the enclosure to be in direct contact with the particulates and the electrolyte immediately surrounding the particulates. The flexible enclosure may be contained, at least in part, in a rigid porous container that directs the action of actuation while allowing fluidic flow of electrolyte through the rigid container.
The actuator assembly may further comprise a gas absorbent material such as activated carbon. Alternatively, gas created in the electrolyte or solution may be collected in a storage area outside of the sealed flexible housing. The storage area is in fluid connection with the electrolyte to allow selective flow of gas, without removing electrolyte into the storage area.
The polymeric actuator of the actuator assembly may act as a platen or piston. Moreover, the electrodes of the actuator assembly may be configured to allow in-line electrical connectivity of a series of actuators in a more complex system. The assembly may include a programmable controller and a power source to create the electrical potential differential in the electrodes power the programmable controller. One or more sensors may communicate feedback to the controller for more automatic operation of the actuator assembly. The actuator assembly or a plurality of actuator assemblies in a desired configuration may be used to pump a fluid.
The invention in another aspect provides a polymeric actuator assembly including a housing, a first electrode and a second electrode, and a electrolyte. The electrodes are separated by a membrane to maintain a pH difference between the electrolyte surrounding the respective electrodes when a voltage is applied between the first and second electrodes. The assembly may include a plurality of polymeric actuators disposed near an electrode that respond to a pH change within the electrolyte.
The polymeric actuator may have increased surface area by pulverizing or grinding the actuating material into granules. The porous container is a polymeric bag, and the granules of actuating material form a slurry with the electrolyte within the bag.
In yet another aspect of the invention, a polymeric actuator component comprises an actuating polymer that increases volume in response to a stimulus cross-linked to a hydrophobic polymer. The actuating polymer and the hydrophobic polymer comprise an ether epoxide and an NH reactant, and preferably the NH component is common to both polymers. The epoxide in the actuating polymer is a hydrophilic di-epoxide, such as polyethylene diglycidyl glycol ether. The epoxide in the hydrophobic polymer is a hydrophobic di-epoxide, such as neopentyl diglycidyl ether or polypropylene diglycidyl glycol ether. The NH reactant may be a polyether amine, such as JEFF AMINE® T-403 available from Huntsman Corporation. The hydrophobic polymer may further comprise polyethyleneimine and water to decrease polymerization time.
The ratio of epoxide to NH reactant in the actuator polymer without dendrimers typically is between about 1 to 2 and about 1 to 10, preferably about 1 to 2.85, and the ratio of epoxide to NH reactant in the hydrophobic polymer typically is between about 1 to 1.5 and about 1 to 3, preferably about 1 to 2.0. By incorporating dendrimers the ratio of epoxide to NH reactant can become significantly different dependent on the number of NH sites on each dendrite molecule these can range from 4 NH units in a 1st generation molecule to over 5,000 in a tenth generation molecule. Polymers incorporating dendrimers would have a much larger epoxide to NH unit ratio and could easily be between 1 to 4 and 1 to thousands of NH units.
The composite hydrogel material of the invention may be used to produce an actuator polymer that is sealed in a defined volume by the hydrophobic polymer, or an actuator polymer that is protected from the external environment by the hydrophobic polymer. The composite hydrogel material may be used as a sensor material structure, gel electrolyte material, selective ion permeable membrane, liquid filtration and treatment component, wound care membrane or acid scavenging material, as well as many other applications that would be recognized by those having skill in the art.
The invention in another aspect provides a polymeric actuator material made by polymerizing an ether reactant including both a hydrophilic ether and a hydrophobic ether and an epoxide. The actuation speed or flexibility of the material may be adjusted according to the ratio of the dominant ether reactant to the lesser ether reactant. In this aspect, the ratio of epoxide to NH reactant typically is preferably between about 1 to 2.5 and about 1 to 3, more preferably about 1 to 2.85. The ratio of hydrophilic ether to hydrophobic ether is between about 100 to 1 and about 1 to 100, typically about 99 to 1.
In yet another aspect, the present invention provides improvements in the electrodes of polymer actuators. An electrode capable of double layer capacity or charge storage within but not limited to an activated carbon layer applied or bonded to the electrode is desirable to control gas generation at the electrode and electrolyte interface in a polymer actuator. This aspect of the invention provides a device for activating a polymer actuator, including one or more polymer actuators, each actuator having one or more double layer capacitor electrodes. The polymer actuators are either activated electrically or activated chemically. The double layer capacitor electrodes are in an electrolyte that may be either aqueous or non-aqueous. The electrodes may be connected to a discharge circuit and a controller, wherein the controller is configured to open and close the discharge circuit at a predetermined time or upon the accumulation of a specified amount of charge in the system.
FIG. 4 depicts an actuator assembly in schematic form, including a double layer capacitor electrode, according to one aspect of the present invention.
In the following description directional or geometric terms such as “upper”, “lower”, and “side” are used solely with reference to the orientation of the Figures depicted in the drawings. These are not to imply or be limited to a direction with respect to a gravitational reference frame but are utilized to distinguish directions relative to each other. Because components of the invention can be positioned in a number of different orientations, the directional terminology is used for purposes of illustration and is in no way limiting. It is to be understood that other embodiments may be utilized and structural or logical changes may be made without departing from the scope of the present invention.
Details in the various embodiments such as how current or wiring is routed to electrodes from power supplies are left out for illustrative simplicity since various methods of such routing is known in the art. The term “electrolyte” refers to and includes all aqueous, non-aqueous, polymer and solid electrolytes, including those that are generally well known in the art. The term “electrodes” refer to anodes and cathodes commonly used in electrochemical systems that are made of materials well known in the art such as metals, carbons, graphenes, oxides or conducting polymers or combinations of these. The term “separator” refers to any nano, micro or macro porous material that allows targeted ions to move through or across it faster than surrounding ion containing media. The term “ion” refers to ions and ion species as well as anion, cation, electrons and protons, and concentration values of these. The term “housing” refers to the exterior portion of the device which may be fabricated from flexible material, rigid material, elastic materials, non elastic materials or a combination of these such as rubbers, silicone, polyurethane, metalized polymer films and other plastics or polymers known in the art. The housing is configured to allow movement and expansion of the internal parts as well as allowing for filling the device with electrolyte, acting as a container and barrier to stop any electrolyte leakage or evaporation, allowing electrodes to make electrical contact with power source as well as to enter and exit the housing, if needed, and also the ability to vent any unwanted gas generation, if needed.
Referring to the drawings, an actuator 100 is comprised in part of a polymeric actuating material. In an exemplary embodiment these polymer actuators are formed from ion or pH responsive epoxy polymer Hydrogel based polymers. Examples of such polymers are described in commonly owned WIPO patent application WO 2008/079440 A2, Entitled ‘SUPER ELASTIC EPOXY HYDROGEL”, filed on Jul. 10, 2007 and published on Jul. 3, 2008. Other polymer actuator examples may contain polymers which have ionic functional groups, such as carboxylic acid, phosphoric acid, sulfonic acid, primary amine, secondary amine, tertiary amine, and ammonium, acrylic acid, methacrylic acid, vinylacetic acid, maleic acid, meta kurir yl oxy ethylphosphoric acid, vinylsulfonic acid, styrene sulfonic acid, vinylpyridine, vinylaniline, vinylimidazole, aminoethyl acrylate, methylamino ethyl acrylate, dimethylamino ethyl acrylate, ethylamino ethyl acrylate, ethyl methylamino ethyl acrylate, diethylamino ethyl acrylate, aminoethyl methacrylate, methylamino ethyl methacrylate, dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate, ethylamino ethyl methacrylate, ethyl methylamino ethyl methacrylate, diethylamino ethyl methacrylate, aminoproply acrylate, methylaminopropyl acrylate, dimethylamino propylacrylate, ethylaminopropyl acrylate, ethyl methylaminopropyl acrylate, diethylamino propylacrylate, aminopropyl methacrylate, methylaminopropyl methacrylate, dimethylaminopropyl methacrylate, ethylaminopropyl methacrylate, ethyl methylaminopropyl methacrylate, polymers, such as diethylamino propyl methacrylate, dimethylaminoethyl acrylamide, dimethylaminopropylacrylamide, and alpha kurir yl oxy ethyl trimethylammonium salts, are reported to be of use but these examples are for reference and not intended to limit the scope or use of the invention.
The invention in one aspect comprises new actuating polymers comprised of hydrophobic materials cross linked with smart hydrogel polymers using multiple di-epoxides or polyepoxides as the cross linking mechanism to adhere the materials together at the molecular level. The composite material also may be formed by using a single diepoxide or polyepoxide and then cross linking different layers of material via the polyamine components such as JEFF AMINE® with different functionalities or polymer chains and back bones.
Previously filed PCT/US2007/073188 (hereby incorporated in its entirety), describes unique epoxy hydrogel polymers formed by reacting a polyether amine with a polyglycidyl ether. The resulting polymer is a super elastic hydrogel having various applications. The epoxy hydrogel can be produced by mixing ratios of “ether reactants” such as polyethylene glycol diglycidyl ether and polyoxyalkyleneamines and H2O resulting in an aqueous polymerization of the materials. Particularly preferred are polyoxyalkyleneamines such as commercially available from Huntsman Corporation under the brand name JEFF AMINE® and other polyether amines as an “epoxy” component that is reacted with various ethers to form epoxy hydrogels. The polyoxyalkyleneamines contain primary amino groups attached to the terminus of a polyether backbone. They are thus “polyether amines.” The polyether backbone is based either on propylene oxide (PO), ethylene oxide (EO), mixed propylene oxide/ethylene oxide or may contain other backbone segments and varied reactivity provided by hindering the primary amine or through secondary amine functionality.
In one embodiment of the invention, hydrophilic variants of hydrogel polymer actuators are cross linked based on JEFF AMINE® T-403 and Polyethylene digycidyl glycol ether to hydrophobic variants of the gel by changing the diglycidyl (ether reactant) component and keeping the same epoxy-JEFF AMINE® T-403 component.
Referring in particular to FIG. 1A, simple cylinders 10 comprised of half hydrophilic actuator material 12 and half non actuating hydrophobic material 14 cross linked together at the molecular level may be cast. The actuator material 12 is first placed into a mold or cast and partially cured. Then, a second material is added to the mold and both materials are allowed to totally cure. Ratios of di-epoxides to NH may be varied, and both neopentyl diglycidyl ether and polypropylene diglycidyl glycol ether may be substituted for the polyethylene diglycidyl glycol ether used in the actuator material. A mixture of JEFF AMINE® T-403 and Neopentyl glycol diglycidyl ether yields a polymer with hydrophobic properties advantageous to actuator applications. In this way, two or more types of epoxy polymers may be adhered together even though they have very different properties.
In a specific embodiment, the hydrophobic polymer 14 is bonded to the actuator material 12. In FIG. 1C the hydrophobic polymer 14 is bonded to the actuator hydrophilic material 12 with addressable electrodes 6 and 7 electrically connected to the controller sensor or sensors and power source. A number of different chemicals may be added to JEFF AMINE® T-403 in order to form a polymer with both hydrophobic properties and the ability to bind to an actuator gel such as that described in previously filed PCT/US2007/073188. For example, neopentyl glycol diglycidyl ether may be added to JEFF AMINE® T-403 with an Epoxide/NH Reactant ratio of 1 to 2.85, the same Epoxide/NH Reactant ratio present in the standard actuator gel formulation. To ensure prompt polymerization, the ratio of epoxide/NH Reactant ratio may be decreased. Neopentyl glycol diglycidyl ether and JEFF AMINE® T-403 mixtures with an Epoxide/NH Reactant ratio of 1 to 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, and 2.0 were all found to successfully polymerize after heating at 60 degrees C. for 5 hours and further curing at room temperature for 72 hours. The hydrophobicity of the polymers with these ratios yielded an approximate maximum of about 8-10% swelling after storage in water for up to three weeks. Furthermore, as the Epoxide/NH Reactant ratio is increased, the elasticity of the resultant polymer is also increased. As a result, a mixture of JEFF AMINE® T-403 and neopentyl glycol diglycidyl ether with an Epoxide/NH Reactant ratio of 1 to 2.0 displays excellent adhesion with the actuator polymer 12, not only after curing, but also with hydration.
If desired, the hydrophobicity may be increased and the time required for polymerization decreased. Poly (propylene glycol) diglycidyl ether (PPGDGE) may be added to a mixture of Neopentyl glycol diglycidyl ether and JEFF AMINE® T-403, maintaining an Epoxide/NH Reactant ratio of 1 to 2.0. or more Polymers with 10%, 26%, and 50% PPGDGE were synthesized and stored in water to test their hydrophobicity or resistance to swelling. All gels swelled between 12% and 15% after storage in water for two weeks. Further, it was surprisingly found that the addition of PPGDGE results in a decrease in polymer elasticity as compared to the base Neopentyl glycol diglycidyl ether and JEFF AMINE® T-403 polymer.
In order to decrease gel curing time, Polyethyleneimine (1300 molecular weight) may be added to the base Neopentyl glycol diglycidyl ether and JEFF AMINE® T-403 gel. The addition of 10% and 15% polyethyleneimine along with 10% water results in gels that polymerize more quickly. The gels completely polymerized after heating at 60 degrees C. for 5 hours and did not require further curing at room temperature to decrease gel stickiness.
The advantage of faster polymerization may be accompanied by a decrease in hydrophobicity. These gels including Polyethyleneimine were found to swell between 23% and 32% after storage in water for two weeks. Therefore, polymers with an increased hydrophobicity and decreased polymerization time are possible, but may be accompanied by performance tradeoffs, particularly in the hydrophobicity of the resultant polymer.
Initial actuation testing of new composite actuator structures comprised of a hydrophilic actuator polymer and a hydrophobic polymer depicted graphically in FIG. 1B successfully showed 100% swelling at each actuator portion under positive electric current of 1 mA. Accordingly, an addressable location peristaltic type of pump mechanism, or an array of actuators as shown in FIG. 1C may effectively be constructed of the examined composite polymers. Similarly, the examined polymers were shown to be smart and chemical responsive hydrogels, capable of being used in a variety of applications. Materials comprising these polymers may be cast in many layers and shapes that would be advantageous to a particular use and application.
In another embodiment of the invention, two or more of the di-epoxides are combined into one singular polymer actuator composition and the performance of the actuator material is adjusted according to the ratio of the dominant functional di-epoxide to the lesser functional di-epoxide. The ratio of the dominant functional di-epoxide to the lesser functional di-epoxide may be varied to advantageously vary actuation speed or flexibility of the material. In a particular embodiment, 1% neopentyl glycol diglycidyl ether is added to the JEFF AMINE® T403 and PEGDE formulation mentioned in previous PCT/US2007/073188, resulting in a much faster actuator. This is not intended to limit the use or the materials used in a composite assembly made by cross-linking the functional layers.
A composite hydrogel material may be used as a sensor material structure, gel electrolyte material, selective ion permeable membrane, liquid filtration and treatment, wound care membrane, actuator or even acid scavenging material. This process also may be used to seal the external layer or layers of a composite structure such as an actuator thereby effectively sealing in the electrolyte held within or around the polymer to protect from evaporation. Additionally, internal materials may be protected from the external environment by UV exposure protection using the described composite hydrogels. The embodiments described above are just a few examples for which the composite hydrogel of the invention may be used for and are not meant to limit the scope of the invention.
In one application, the present invention concerns improvements made to a polymeric actuator including an increase in effective surface area to increase magnitude and repeatability of an expansion rate of a polymeric actuator. This has been accomplished by increasing the actual surface area of the polymer and by increasing the effective surface area, electrode improvements, and by gas mitigation methods. The improvements of this invention have been demonstrated to achieve a 400% increase in a volumetric expansion rate over prior art methods while reducing variability.
An exemplary embodiment of an actuator assembly 100 according to the present invention is schematically depicted with respect to FIG. 2A. Actuator assembly 100 includes a polymeric actuator material 113 and an associated electrode set including top electrode 106 and bottom electrode 108. Bottom electrode is in contact with metal hydride material 110. The electrode set and the polymeric actuator 113 are contained within housing 114. The housing 114 may be formed with folds, pleats or other excess material on the sides in order to allow for the large expansion rates of the actuator material as well as providing storage pockets or areas for any excess gas generated to collect without impacting the expansion rate of the actuator assembly. An electrolyte 112 is also contained within housing 114 in contact with the electrode set (106, 108) and actuator 113. Actuator 113 is a polymerized polymer actuator particulate made by grinding hydrated epoxy gel, and placing the gel into a flexible porous bag 116. The actuator 113 may also be comprised of two or more of the di-epoxides described above to vary the performance of the actuator material. Bag 116 is made of woven polypropylene mesh 116, 0.006″ thick with 150 micron hole sizes and heat sealed. One or more bags can be used in the configuration to take advantage of volume and stroke aspects. A porous separator membrane 115 separates the pH gradient between electrode 108 and opposing electrode 106 while still allowing contiguous electrolyte 112.
Polymeric actuator 113 will expand or contract in response to a change in the electrolyte 112. There are several types of polymeric actuators 113 that may be used, including an “acid-responsive” polymeric actuator and a “base-responsive” polymeric actuator. An “acid-responsive” polymeric actuator expands in response to a decreased pH in electrolyte 112 surrounding polymeric actuator 113. This can be accomplished by providing a positive bias of electrode 106 relative to electrode 108. Applying the positive bias causes current to flow from electrode 106 to electrode 108 and causes a positive ion (H+) concentration in the electrolyte 112 surrounding actuator 113 to increase. The voltage applied between electrodes arranged in the aqueous solution consumes hydrogen ion and/or hydroxide ion as a result of electrode reaction or yields a concentration gradient due to electric double layer occurring on the surfaces of the electrodes, thereby changing the pH in the vicinity of the electrodes. Thus the electrolyte surrounding actuator 113 becomes more acidic (lower pH) and causes actuator 113 to expand.
Since the expansion speed of a solid polymer gel block is limited by the ability of the electrolyte or solvent to diffuse through the polymer actuator the speed of actuation may be increased by increasing the surface area of the polymer actuator material with access to the electrolyte. If the electrical bias is reversed, the positive ion flow reverses and electrolyte 112 surrounding actuator 113 becomes more basic (or less acidic) which causes an opposite or reverse effect on actuator 113.
A “base-responsive” polymeric actuator 113 also may be used. In that case, applying a negative bias to electrode 106 relative to electrode 108 will cause the pH in the electrolyte 112 surrounding polymeric actuator to increase which will in turn cause the base-responsive polymeric actuator 113 to expand. In this case the metal hydride 110 would be in contact with the electrode 106 in an aqueous electrolyte solution depending on the electrolyte, electrochemical reaction and type of gas produced during operation. When the polymeric actuator 113 expands, it causes the entire actuator assembly 100 to expand.
An alternative design of an actuator assembly 120 utilizing both acid responsive and base responsive actuators is depicted in FIG. 2B in schematic form. Actuator assembly 120 includes an acid responsive polymeric actuator cast gel 123A, a base responsive polymeric actuator cast gel 123B, a top electrode 128, and a bottom electrode 126 in contact with metal hydride 121 and then exiting the housing, all within housing 124. An electrolyte 122A surrounds top electrode 128 and acid responsive actuator 123A; a bottom electrolyte 122B surrounds bottom electrode 126 and base responsive actuator 123B. A porous separator membrane 125 separates the top electrolyte 122A from the bottom electrolyte 122B while allowing ions to flow between electrolytes.
When a positive bias current is applied between top electrode 128 and bottom electrode 126 the pH of the top electrolyte 122A decreases while the pH of the bottom electrolyte 122B increases. The decreased pH (acidity increase) of top electrolyte 122A causes acid responsive polymer material 123A to expand while the increased pH (more basic) of bottom electrolyte 122B causes base responsive polymer material 123B to expand. Having two layers of actuators may double the total displacement obtainable for the entire actuator assembly 120. It is anticipated that additional layers of polymeric actuators with alternating layers of acid responsive and base responsive polymeric actuators can be used to further increase the maximum aggregate expansion of actuator assembly 120.
An alternative embodiment of an actuator assembly 130 is depicted with respect to FIG. 2C and includes the same embodiment of actuator assembly shown in FIG. 2A with the addition of a top electrode 136 with metal hydride material 131A in contact with top electrode 136, as well as the bottom electrode 138.
An alternative embodiment of an actuator assembly 130 is depicted with respect to FIG. 2C and includes the same embodiment of actuator assembly shown in FIG. 2A with the polymer actuator material as a cast gel, it is also possible to use multiple actuator material castings or bags in the same configuration, the same would be true for all of the configurations depicted, also shown is a top electrode 136 with metal hydride material 131A in contact with top electrode 136, as well as the bottom electrode 138.
Another polymer actuator assembly embodiment is shown in FIG. 3A wherein the top electrode 206 is in close proximity to gas adsorbing material 215 such as an activated carbon which can adsorb, for example, oxygen when wet. The gas adsorbing material is in contact with electrolyte 212 and adsorbs gas produced at electrode 206 as the gas migrates through electrolyte 212. Bottom electrode 208 is in contact with metal hydride material 210. The electrode set and the polymeric actuator material as a cast gel 213 are contained within housing 214. Contained within housing 214 is an electrolyte 212 in contact with the electrode set and actuator material 213. Separating electrode 208 from surrounding electrolyte 212 is a porous separator membrane 215. Polymeric actuator 213 will expand or contract in response to a change in the electrolyte 212, utilizing the same type of actuation mechanism and response described for FIG. 2A.
Yet another preferred polymer actuator assembly embodiment is shown in FIG. 3B wherein the actuator material 230 is a polymer particulate held in a porous flexible bag 223 and then the polymer particulate containing bag 223 is held in a firm porous structure 229 helping to contain and direct the swelling flexible bag 223 in one direction during the polymer material's 230 actuation response for efficiency of stroke or improved distance that the plate 228 can be pushed by flexible bag 223 expanding due to the swelling of the polymer material 230. The Top electrode 206 is inserted into the particulate bag 223 between the polymer particles 230 to maximize contact.
The assembly 224 is vented into another gas absorbing material 227 such as “Oxisorb” liquid form oxygen absorbent. The gas absorbent 227 is separated from the electrolyte by hydrophobic separator materials 226 that allow gas to penetrate while constraining electrolyte fluid. It is possible also to have no absorbent 227 in the vent in order to merely contain the gas in a separated compartment so the gas does not impact the actuation of the polymer materials. The separator material 226 is in contact with electrolyte 222 and allows gas produced at electrode 206 to collect as the gas migrates through electrolyte 222. Bottom electrode 208 is in contact with metal hydride material 221 which allows gas to adsorb to the metal hydride material 221. The electrode set (206, 208) and the polymeric actuator 223 are contained within housing 224 in contact with an electrolyte 222. A porous membrane 225 may separate electrode 208 from surrounding electrolyte 222.
Shown in all figures is the electrical power supply 101 and controller 103 for control of the actuator assembly's motion, speed and force. The embodiment in FIG. 3B also shows interaction with a sensor 105 for feedback and automated control of the actuator assembly.
There are many gas mitigation materials and techniques that are well known in the art of various analytical sciences and methods such as HPLC or other methods of chromatography, all of the embodiments described are meant to show possible actuator assembly configurations utilizing gas mitigation materials, components and techniques as part of the assembly and are not meant to limit the scope of the invention in any way.
In another aspect of the present invention, an electrode capable of double layer capacitance or charge storage is used to control gas generation within the actuator. For example, psuedocapacitor type electrodes may be used to control gas generation.
According to the present invention the electrical current builds a charge layer instead of generating gas at the electrolyte and electrode surface interface. This process continues until the electrode is fully charged, at which point, the charge is disbursed and the gas is produced.
As seen in the example shown in FIG. 4, the actuator assembly is contained in a flexible non permeable housing material 302 such as (but not limited to) a metalized polyethylene film. The housing contains the electrolyte 308, polymer actuator material 301, semi porous container for the polymer 303, the electrode in contact with or in the vicinity of the polymer 304, a semi porous separator membrane or sheet 305 located between the electrodes, a carbon PTFE capacitive layer coating 306 and the opposing electrode 307 in electrical connection with discharge circuit 309, controller and power source.
In one example of the present aspect of the invention, the electrode is discharged at a predetermined time in the charge cycle. In this example, the point at which the gas is generated is a function of the predetermined time, rather than the rate at which the energy accumulates within the capacitor. Once the discharge occurs, the charging process starts again, thereby eliminating gas generation at the electrode by using charge and discharge cycles.
To manufacture this type of electrode, a Teflon (PTFE) aqueous emulsion, such as those made by DuPont, is mixed with a high surface area carbon or other high surface area material, such as, for example, activated carbon; oxides such as, for example, metal oxides; as well as other materials such as metal hydrides. These materials can be used either on their own or mixed together to produce a desired performance curve of gas mitigation at the electrode. The high surface area material is mixed with the emulsion and pressed or coated onto the electrode and baked to the correct processing temperature to bind the mixture together and to the electrode, this process is well known in the art of battery and capacitor manufacturing. The electrode substrate can be perforated, expanded or plated with solid metals (such as but not limited a low cost aluminum or stainless steel foil), such as is well known in the art.
It should be emphasized that the above-described embodiments of the present invention, particularly, any “preferred” embodiments, are merely possible examples of implementations, merely set forth for a clear understanding of the principles of the present invention. Many variations and modifications may be made to the above-described embodiments without departing substantially from the spirit and principles of the invention. All such modifications and variations are intended to be included herein within the scope of this invention and protected by the following claims.
wherein the sealed outer housing is provided with excess material to allow for expansion of the outer housing.
2. The device of claim 1, wherein the polymer actuator device is activated electrically.
3. The device of claim 1, wherein the polymer actuator device is activated chemically.
4. The device of claim 1, wherein the double layer capacitor electrode is in a non-aqueous electrolyte.
5. The device of claim 1, wherein the double layer capacitor electrode is in a aqueous electrolyte.
6. The device of claim 1, wherein the double layer capacitor electrode is connected to a discharge circuit, and wherein the discharge circuit is in electrical contact with a controller.
7. The device of claim 6 wherein the discharge circuit includes a storage device to store and reuse electrical charge.
8. The device of claim 6, wherein the controller is configured to open and close the discharge circuit at a predetermined time or upon the accumulation of a specified amount of charge in the system.
9. The device of claim 1, comprising two or more of said polymer actuator devices connected in series, forming a pump.
10. The device of claim 1, wherein the first electrode and the second electrode each have a double layer capacitive layer coating.
"An Electrochemical Microactuator: Principle and First Results", Neagu et al., Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems, vol. 5. No. 1, Mar. 1996.
"ElectroActive Polymers-EAPs," downloaded from http://www.azom.com on Dec. 16, 2013 (5 pgs).
"Epoxy-Based Electroactive Polymer Gels", Yoshioka Y and Calvert P, Experimental Mechanics, vol. 42, No. 4, Dec. 2002, pp. 404-408.
"Magnetic Driven Compression Cascade and Packaging", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, IBM Corp., col. 38, No. 1, Jan. 1995.
"Micro-Dispensing Positive Displacement Pump", Anonymous, Research Disclosure, Mason Publications, Hampshire GB, vol. 374, No. 4, Jun. 1995.
"Structure and Mechanism of Two Types of Micro-Pump Using Polymer Gel", Hattori et al., Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, 1992, MEMS 92, Proceedings. An Investigation of Micro Structures, Sensors, Actuators, Machines and Robot, IEEE Travemunde, Germany, Feb. 1992.
Banister et al., "Molecular Engineering of Polymer Actuators for Biomedical and Industrial Use," Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD) 2012, vol. 8340 (20 pgs).
Bar-Cohen, Y., "Electroactive polymers (EAP) actuators as artificial muscles: reality, potential and challenges," SPIE Press, 2001, 671 pgs, (book description only, 4 pgs).
Canadian Official Action issued in Canadian Patent Application Serial No. 2,557,325 dated Feb. 8, 2011 (5 pgs).
Chinese Board Decision, Appln. No. 200580048306.3, dated Dec. 26, 2014 (14 pgs).
Chinese Notification of ReExamination and English translation, Appln. or Pat. No. 200580048306.3; dated Aug. 22, 2014 (11 pgs).
Chinese Office Action (w/English translation) issued in corresponding application No. 200780032137.3, dated Mar. 12, 2013 (14 pgs).
Chinese Office Action (w/translation) issued in application No. 201380022758.9, dated Dec. 14, 2015 (12 pgs).
Chinese Office Action and Translation dated Jul. 6, 2011 issued in Chinese Patent Appln. No. 200780032137.3 (7 pgs).
Chinese Office Action issued in application No. 201180007957.3, dated May 22, 2015 (15 pgs).
Chinese Office Action issued in application No. 201280057499.9, dated Aug. 28, 2015 (13 pgs).
Chinese Office Action issued Jul. 1, 2014 with English translation, Appln. No. or Patent No. 201180007957.3 (17 pgs).
Chinese Office Action, Application/Patent No. 200780032137.3, dated Dec. 23, 2011 (6 pgs).
Chinese Official Action + translation dated Feb. 1, 2011 issued in Appln. No. 200780032137.3, (8 pgs).
Chinese Official Action dated Mar. 17, 2011, Appln. No. 200580048306.3.
Chinese Official Action issued in corresponding Chinese Patent Appln. Serial No. 200580048306.3 dated Nov. 4, 2011 (5 pgs).
European Office Action dated Sep. 14, 2010, Appln. No. 07 872 242.8-2102, (6 pgs).
European Official Action issued in Appln. No. 04714231.0, dated May 11, 2011 (2 pgs).
European Official Action issued in Appln. No. 04714231.0-2315/1611353, dated Oct. 4, 2010 (4 pgs).
European Official Action, Apr. 6, 2011 issued in Appln. No. 07 872 242.8-2102 (4 pages).
European Official Action, Aug. 29, 2011 issued in Appln. No. 07 872 242.8-2102 (6 pages).
European Search Report dated Feb. 18, 2011 issued in European Application Serial No. 10014840.2-2315 (7 pgs).
European Search Report dated Jun. 8, 2009, Serial No. 07872242.8-2102.
Extended European Search Report issued in application No. 12836396.7, dated Nov. 10, 2015 (12 pgs).
First Examination Report dated Dec. 31, 2013, Indian Patent Application No. 3011/CHENP/2007 (2 pgs).
India Hearing Notice in Reference of Application No. 3011/CHENP/2007, dated Feb. 5, 2015 (1 pg).
Indian Examination Report; Indian Patent Application Serial No. 2371/CHENP/2005, dated Sep. 7, 2006.
Indian Office Action issued in application No. 137/CHENP/2009, dated Mar. 17, 2015 (2 pgs).
Indian Office Action issued in application No. 137/CHENP/2009, dated Oct. 29, 2015 (2 pgs).
International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US10/48489 dated Mar. 13, 2012 (12 pgs).
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued in corresponding PCT Patent Appln. Serial No. PCT/US2012/057129 dated Apr. 1, 2014 ( 7 pgs).
International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Search Authority issued in PCT/US09/34557, dated Apr. 13, 2009 (7 pgs).
Japanese Office Action (with translation) issued in related application No. 2012-551386, dated Jan. 28, 2015 (9 pgs).
Japanese Office Action with translation, Patent Appln. 2009-519642, dated Jul. 9, 2012 (9 pgs).
Notice of Allowance issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/395,627, dated Sep. 16, 2015 (22 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Dec. 28, 2009 (6 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Jan. 2, 2009 (9 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Jul. 1, 2009 (7 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Mar. 5, 2008 (41 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated May 5, 2010 (7 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Nov. 23, 2010 (10 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Sep. 15, 2010 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 10/786,718, dated Sep. 16, 2008 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,537, dated Dec. 15, 2008 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,537, dated Jul. 21, 2008 (10 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,537, dated Mar. 4, 2008 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/254,537, dated Sep. 17, 2007 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Feb. 2, 2011 (13 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Feb. 9, 2015 (11 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Jul. 22, 2011 (11 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Jun. 30, 2014 (18 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/414,536, dated Nov. 29, 2010 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,880, dated Jun. 3, 2013 (8 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/918,466, dated Jul. 11, 2013 (36 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 12/978,152, dated May 23, 2011 (9 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/093,648, dated Aug. 29, 2013 (5 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/395,627, dated Feb. 5, 2015 (7 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/395,627, dated Sep. 10, 2014 (9 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,172, dated Jun. 27, 2012 (14 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,172, dated Nov. 9, 2012 (6 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 14/071,371, dated Aug. 21, 2014 (16 pgs).
Office Action issued in related U.S. Appl. No. 14/071,371, dated Dec. 18, 2014 (11 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/373,245, dated Sep. 9, 2015 (20 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,880, dated Jul. 22, 2015 (23 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/918,466, dated Nov. 19, 2015 (25 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/018,024, dated Feb. 24, 2015 (31 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/424,172, dated Jun. 10, 2015 (25 pgs).
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/347,597, dated Jun. 3, 2015 (33 pgs).
Office Action issued Nov. 23, 2012 is U.S. Appl. No. 12/745,880 (26 pgs.).
Official Action in EPO Application No. 04 714 231.0-2315, Jan. 25, 2007 and Nov. 13, 2008.
Official Action received in corresponding Chinese Application No. 200480010203.3, Nov. 14, 2008 (5 pgs).
Official Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/721,800, dated Aug. 27, 2010.
Official. Action in Chinese Application No. 200480010203.3, Nov. 14, 2008 and Sep. 14, 2007.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in PCT/US2013/031062, dated Sep. 16, 2014 (9 pgs).
PCT International Search Report and International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Aug. 26, 2005, PCT/US04/005922.
PCT International Search Report and International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Feb. 19, 2009, PCT/US08/85421.
PCT International Search Report and International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Jul. 7, 2008, PCT/US07/73188.
PCT International Search Report and International Preliminary Report on Patentability, dated Oct. 25, 2006, PCT/US05/45210.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Mar. 28, 2011 PCT/US11/23375.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Oct. 22, 2004, PCT/US04/005922 (17 pgs).
Search Report and Written Opinion received in Applicant's corresponding European Patent Application Serial No. 05854009.7, Nov. 11, 2009.
Unsolicited letter from Dr. Elson Silva, dated Oct. 21, 2010 (5 pgs).
US Official Action issued Aug. 27, 2010 in related U.S. Appl. No. 11/721,800 (13 pgs).
Yoshioka et al., "Electrically Driven Miniature Hydrogels as Muscle-Like Acuators", 2001; Proceedings of SPIE vol. 4329, pp. 216-222.

References: application No. 200780032137
 application No. 201380022758
 application No. 201180007957
 application No. 201280057499
 application No. 12836396
 Application No. 3011
 Application No. 3011
 application No. 137
 application No. 137
 application No. 2012
 Application No. 04
 Application No. 200480010203
 Application No. 200480010203