Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/090924.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 18:11:30+00:00

Document:
APPLIED SIGNAL: Securities Suit Deal Got Final Approval in Aug.
WET SEAL: Defends Employees' Complaint in San Francisco, Calif.
WET SEAL: Defending Suit by Employees in Orange County, Calif.
DIREXION SHARES: Federman & Sherwood File Complaint in S.D.N.Y.
MEDICAL CAPITAL: Girard Gibbs Files Complaint in C.D. Calif.
PSYCHIATRIC SOLUTIONS: Coughlin Stoia Files Suit in M.D. Tenn.
UCBH HOLDINGS: Glancy Files Shareholder Fraud Suit in N.D. Calif.
UCBH HOLDINGS: Coughlin Files Investor Fraud Suit in N.D. Calif.
year ended June 30, 2009.
in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Nassau County.
Officer (Class Action Reporter, July 14, 2009).
for aerospace and defense applications.
were consolidated as, "In re Applied Signal Technology Inc.
Securities Litigation, Master File No. 4:05-cv-1027 (SBA)."
issued during the class period.
been filed, Sept. 9, 2009, Form 10-Q Filing with the U.S.
Pharmaceuticals Plc, Court File No. 06-cv-314632-CP (Ont. Super.
didn't tell people of the drug's harmful side effects.
to determine whether Canadians can sue as a group.
point, the judge said, they don't have to.
WBCT Radio, 93.7 FM, also known as B-93.
attorney John Tallman, Esq., said.
"This case is just about custom-made for a class-action suit,"
Mr. Tallman told Mr. Tunison.
names Del Monte Foods Co. as one of the defendants, are pending.
purported class action suits relating to these pet food recalls.
the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado.
settlement deal to resolve their dispute.
publication beginning June 16, 2008.
has been scheduled for Oct. 14, 2008.
and Dec. 12, 2008, these class members filed Notices of Appeal.
company's Sept. 9, 2009, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
snacks was denied in June 2009.
further distribution of the allegedly defective products.
appeal of the Court's decision.
employees safe and preventing workplace accidents and injuries.
drugs, an employer has a right to know.
a plant where heavy machinery and sharp glass is used everyday.
the ADA," Mr. Boston told Ms. Baldas.
authorities and the plaintiffs acting through a class action.
Eni recorded a provision for these matters.
proceedings to which the indexes are attached.
breaks, uniforms, and calculation of vacation pay.
entry into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with SPAH.
Commission dated Sept. 1, 2009.
violated the Drivers Privacy Protection Act.
A copy of the Complaint in Downing v. Globe Direct LLC, Case No.
in Blount County Court, Tenn.
Thomas S. Scott, Jr., Esq.
all of Jacobs Technology's other similarly-situated employees.
employees nationwide to file formal objections every year.
annual objection policy under the Railway Labor Act in a U.S.
in force in all workplaces not governed by that statute.
to employees covered by the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA).
IGNORING THIS NOTICE WILL AFFECT YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS.
Boulanger v. Johnson & Johnson Corporation, Court File No.
you can call the Administrator at 1-866-348-0333.
Courts for a proposed Settlement.
and they deny any wrongdoing.
information is included at the end of this Notice.
distribution of any balance remaining.
is currently available online at the Administrator's website.
1-866-348-0333. Please do not contact the Courts.
Court of Justice and the Superior Court of Quebec.
securities fraud class-action lawsuit captioned Lefkoe v. Jos A.
Robert N. Wildrick, the company's chief executive officer.
9/23/86 v. Jos. A. Bank Clothiers, Inc., Case No. 06-cv-02011 (D.
claims and seek the same relief.
Tewas Trust Action was administratively closed.
have been added as defendants.
damages, costs, and attorneys' fees.
utilizing the Federal Multidistrict Litigation program.
lawsuits when certain criteria are met.
matters to the Western District of Missouri.
Commission dated Sept. 8, 2009.
had sold products under the Nasal Comfort and Xcid brand names.
Louisiana refinery was settled in July 2009.
Action Reporter, Sept. 17, 2008).
insurers, AEGIS, has raised lack of coverage as a defense.
Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana on July 24, 2009.
indemnity from one of its insurers, AEGIS, in September 2009.
to join the class action.
mortgage meltdown started last year.
April 30 and July 30.
On Thursday, the Pennsylvania-based Law Offices of Howard G.
price of the company's securities."
an additional loan loss provision of $117 million.
significantly, the Brower Piven suit alleged.
stock to contact them to be represented in the class action.
subjected to these types of allegations.
Bank of San Luis Obispo.
action lawsuits regarding wage and hour claims.
remains pending as of Aug. 1, 2009.
the company's Sept. 9, 2009, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
linens, and other home related merchandise.
certification in Funeral Consumers Alliance, Inc., et al. v.
Batesville Casket Co., Case No. H-05-3394.
home defendants at any time.
relief, interest, costs and attorneys' fees.
single judge in the Southern District of Texas.
SOCIAL SECURITY'S POLICY ON "FLEEING FELONS"
based on a violation of probation or parole.
Citizens Law Center 510-663-1055 ext. 301.
if you disagree with it.
of the key provisions of the tentative settlement.
regarding SSA's fugitive felon policy.
considers a person's request to serve as a representative payee.
not a person is suitable to serve as a representative payee.
receive a mailed notice or a protective filing date.
asserted in the Martinez complaint against SSA.
When Will Relief Be Provided?
end of 2010. This timeframe is subject to change.
affected by the settlement after final court approval.
at the public hearing on the proposed settlement as stated above.
it reviews the settlement ONLY IF you follow these procedures.
above. Your objections must be received by September 10, 2009.
b) A statement of the reasons for the objection.
sent to the attorneys listed at the end of this notice.
exclude themselves from the Settlement Class.
expected to take place before December 2009.
The company was named as a defendant.
preliminary approval of the class action settlement.
approval of the class action settlement, subject to appeal.
On April 28, 2008, a notice of appeal of the judgment was filed.
Superior Court to re-evaluate the fairness of the settlement.
items designed for female customers aged 13 to 35.
May 22, 2003 through May 22, 2007.
Sept. 29, 2004, through Sept. 29, 2008.
The company's responsive plea was filed on Nov. 14, 2008.
and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended Aug. 1, 2009.
employed and paid since March 18, 2005.
was named as a defendant.
lawsuits are spreading across Europe, Australia and Asia.
to developments related to securities class action litigation.
helped its clients recover over US $280 million in compensation.
court or other governmental agency overseeing the class action.
with information on the status of ongoing and collected claims.
comprehensive class actions data service."
client data through to the completion of the claim documentation.
asset managers, investment banks and fund managers."
is Interactive Data Corporation's majority stockholder.
Interactive Data (Australia) Pty Ltd.
marks of Interactive Data Corporation.
15 of the Securities Act of 1933.
Medical Provider Funding Corp. VI on or after September 18, 2006.
Securities, Inc., et al., Case No. 09-cv-1084 (AG) (C.D. Calif.).
pursuant to materially false and misleading prospectuses.
LLP, or other attorneys, to serve as your counsel in this action.
facilities to improve the quality, safety and risk management.
compliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
$39.71 per share on July 8, 2008.
2009, a one-day decline of 35%.
http://www.csgrr.com/has more information about the firm.
A copy of the Complaint in Steamfitters Local 449 Pension Fund v.
Cunningham, et al., Case No. 2009-60322 (Tex. Dist Ct., ___ J.
Travis E. Downs, III, Esq.
Benny C. Goodman, III, Esq.
entities who purchased the securities of UCBH Holdings, Inc.
matters, please contact Michael Goldberg, Esquire, or Richard A.
UCBH is a bank holding company.
disclosures the price of UCBH common stock fell over 60%.
of the Company's loan portfolio.
Retirement System v. UCBH Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v.