Source: http://constitution.org/ussc/usscdeci.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 17:00:34+00:00

Document:
Georgia v. Brailsford, 3 U.S. 1 (Dall.) (1794) — Jury has power to judge law in bringing general verdict.
Calder v. Bull, 3 U.S. 386 (Dall.) (1798) — Supreme Court has jurisdiction to overrule unconstitutional state legislation, such as ex post facto laws.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137; 2 L. Ed. 60 (1803) — Courts must not sustain unconstitutional acts of government.
U.S. v. Burr, 8 U.S. (4 Cranch) 469 (1807) — Established standards of evidence for treason.
United States v. Hudson, 7 Cranch 32 (1812) — Courts have no jurisdiction over common law crimes.
McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819) — National Bank was tax-exempt federal agency.
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824) — State may not grant exclusive navigation license for its coastal waters.
Opinion — John Marshall, Concurring Johnson, J.
Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore, 32 U.S. 243 (1833) — Federal courts do not have jurisdiction in cases in which a citizen sues his state for violation of any of the Bill of Rights.
Ex Parte Milligan, 71 U.S. 2 (4 Wall.) (1866) — Civilians may not be tried by military tribunals.
Ex Parte McCardle, 74 U.S. 506 (Wall.) (1868) — Congress may remove jurisdiction from the Supreme Court.
U. S. v. Hall, 98 U.S. 343 (1878) — Congress may prohibit embezzlement of pension payments, enforceable by deprivation of liberty.
Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884) — States not required to indict by grand jury.
Logan v. U.S., 144 U.S. 263 (1892) — Congress may prohibit injury or death of persons in custody of U.S. officials, caused by any person, enforceable by deprivation of life or liberty.
Lochner v. New York, 198 U.S. 45 (1905) — State statute restricting hours of work is a violation of due-process protection of 14th Amendment.
Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 78 (1908) — State not required to protect right against self-incrimination.
Connally v. General Const. Co., 269 U.S. 385 (1926) — State statute void for vagueness.
Palko v. Connecticut, 302 U.S. 319 (1937) — State not required to protect right against double jeopardy.
Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942) — Foreign infiltrators onto U.S. territory may be tried for espionage and sabotage by a military tribunal.
Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 (1943) — A state may not impose a tax or charge on the dissemination of religious literature.
U.S. v. Lovett, 328 U.S. 303 (1946) — Legislative denial of compensation based on political views is a prohibited bill of attainder.
Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947) — Decision of an accused not to testify may be used against him in a state criminal trial.
Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957) — Treaties do not confer powers not authorized by Constitution, and in particular, over civilians outside U.S. territory.
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963) — State required to provide defense counsel to accused unable to hire his own.
Camara v. Municipal Court, 387 U.S. 523 (1967) — Building inspector must obtain warrant to inspect building if owner does not consent to it.
Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1 (1976) — Campaign spending may not be limited, but contributions may be, and the identity of contributors may be required to be disclosed, and anonymous contributors prohibited.
Lewis v. United States, 445 U.S. 55 (1980) — Person who has been convicted of a crime in a state court may be convicted of a federal crime for possession of firearms.
Brown v. Socialist Workers', 459 U.S. 87 (1982) — Minor party which has historically been harassed is exempt from campaign disclosure requirements.
Hafer v. Melo, 502 U.S. 21 (1991) — State officers may be held personally liable for damages based upon actions taken in their official capacities.
Soldal v. Cook County, 506 U.S. 56 (1992) — State or local officials who stand by or protect an unlawful eviction or seizure are liable for damages under 42 USC 1983.
Staples v. United States, 511 U.S. 600 (1994) — Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant knew that his rifle had the characteristics that brought it within the statutory definition of a machinegun.
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm'n, 514 U.S. 334 (1995) — Advocacy publication may be anonymous, and is exempt from campaign disclosure statute.
United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995) — Prohibition against possessing firearm in proximity of a school is not authorized as connected to interstate commerce.
Bennis v. Michigan, 517 U.S. 1163 (1996) — Property used in a crime may be forfeited even though partly or wholly owned by an innocent third party.
Caron v. United States, 524 U.S. 308 (1998) — Even if a State permitted an offender to have the guns he possessed, federal law may use the State’s determination that the offender is more dangerous than law-abiding citizens to impose its own felony conviction.
Saenz v. Roe, Docket 98-97 (Decided May 17, 1999) — State may not deny benefits to new arrivals.
United States v. Morrison, Docket 99-5 (Decided May 15, 2000) — Congress lacked authority to enact a law which provides a federal civil remedy for the victims of gender-motivated violence.
Jones v. United States, Docket 99-5739 (Decided May 22, 2000) — An owner-occupied residence not used for any commercial purpose does not qualify as property “used in” commerce or commerce-affecting activity, so arson of such a dwelling is not subject to federal prosecution.
Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, Docket 99-2047 (Decided Jun. 28, 2001) — A state land-use regulation may present standing to a subsequent owner for compensation under the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment.
US Supreme Court Cases — Opinions from Justia & Oyez.
US Supreme Court Opinions — Findlaw.
US Supreme Court Collection — Cornell.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.