Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Estoppel-Sec-545-Assertion-of-after-acquired-title-Part-5.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 20:24:51+00:00

Document:
34. Allen v. Sayward, 5 Me. 227, 17 Am. Dec. 221; Doane v. Willcutt, 5 Gray (Mass.) 333, 66 Am. Dec. 369; Chauvin v. Wagner, 18 Mo. 531. Contra, Wight-man v. Reynolds, 24 Miss. 675. And see Irvine v. Irvine, 9 Wall. (U. S.) 617, 19 L. Ed. 800; Van-derheyden v. Crandall, 2 Den. (N. Y.) 9.
Short, - Tex. Civ. App. - , 151 S. W. 633.
35. Ante, this section, note 5.
36. Kimball v. Blaisdell, 5 N. H. 533; Gibbs v. Thayer, 6 Cush. (Mass.) 30; Coal Creek Min. & Mfg. Co. v. Ross, 12 Lea (Tenn.) 1. Compare, Bennett v. Davis. 90 Me. 457, 38 Atl. 372.
37. Condit v. Bigalow, 64 N. J. Eq. 504, 54 Atl. 160.
39. Abbett v. Page, 92 Ala. 571, 9 So. 332; Doolittle v. Robertson, 109 Ala. 412, 19 So. 851; Garibaldi v. Shattuck, 70 Cal. 511, 11 Pac. 778; Berthelemy v. Johnson, 3 B. Mon. (Ky.) 90, 38 Am. Dec. 179; Hines v. Robinson, 57 Me. 324, 99 Am. Dec. 772; Stearns v. Hendersass, 9 Cush. (Mass.) 497, 57 Am. Dec. 65; Horbach v. Boyd, 64 Neb. 129, 89 N. W. 644; Tilton v. Emery, 17 N. H. 536; Sherman v. Kane, 86 N. Y. 57; Johnson v. Farlow, 13 Ired, L. (35 N. C.) 84; Chatham v. Lonsford. 149 N. C. 363, 63 S. E. 81; Harn v. Smith, 79 Tex. 310, 23 Am. St. Rep. 340, 15 S. W. 240.
40. Erwin v. Morris, 26 Kan. 664; Foster v. Johnson, 89 Tex. 640, 36 S. W. 67. But only if the sale was for taxes which came due after the conveyance.
Hannah v. Collins, 94 Ind. 201; Porter v. Lafferty, 33 Iowa, 254; Gardner v. Gerrish, 23 Me. 46 Frank v. Caruthers, 108 Mo. 569, 18 S. W. 927.
41. Thielen v. Richardson, 35 Minn. 509, 29 N. W. 677.
42. Harrold v. Morgan, 66 Ga. 398; Condit v. Bigalow, 64 N. J. Eq. 504, 54 Atl. 160.
43. Dewhurst v. Wright, 29 Fla. 223, 10 So. 682; Phillippi v. Leet, 19 Colo. 246, 35 Pac. 540; Kelley v. Jenness, 50 Me. 455, 79 Am. Dec. 623; Harlan v. Jordan, 104 Me. 49, 70 Atl. 1066; Runlet v. Otis, 2 N. H. 167: Wark v. Willard, 13 N. H. 389; Jackson v. Mills, 13 Johns. (N. Y.) 463; Buckingham v. Hanna, 2 Ohio St. 551; Burchard v. Hubbard, 11 Ohio, 316; Fre-telliere v. Hindes, 57 Tex. 392; Newton v. Easterwood, Tex. Civ.
App. - , 154 S. W. 646; Gregory v. Peoples, 80 Va. 355.
44. Molina v. Ramirez, 15 Ariz. 249, 138 Pac. 17; Mountain Home Lumber Co. v. Swartwout, 30 Idaho, 559, 166 Pac. 271.
45. Prouty v. Mather, 49 Vt. 425; See Morris v. Wheat, 8 App. D. C. 379; Hitchcock v. Southern Iron & Timber Co., -Tenn - , 38 S. W. 588; Ver-meule v. Vermeule, 113 Me. 74, 93 Atl. 37.
46. Rannels v. Howe, 145 Fed. 296, 74 C. C. A. 376; Poor v. Robinson, 10 Mass. 131; Wells v. Steckelberg, 52 Neb. 597, 66 Am. St. Rep. 529, 72 N. W. 865; Kellerman v. Miller, 5 Pa. Super. Ct. 443; Corzine's Heirs v. Williams, 85 Tex. 499, 22 S. W. 399; Carbee v. Hopkins, 41 Vt. 250.
47. Randall v. Lower, 98 Ind. 255; Brown v. Phillips, 40 Mich. 264. And see Butterfield v. Lane, 114 Me. 333, 96 Atl. 233. Contra, Hitchcock v. Fortier, 65 111. 239. The latter case is disapproved in Rawle, Covenants for Title, Sec. 267; Bigelow, Estoppel (6th Ed.) 448.
48. See Rector v. Waugh, 17 Mo. 26; Pendill v. Marquette County Agric. Soc. 95 Mich. 491, 55 N. W. 384; Carson v. Carson, 122 N. C. 645, 30 S. E. 4; Doane v. Willicutt, 5 Gray (Mass.) 328.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.