Source: https://www.retailpatentlitigation.com/2017/06/april-2017-retail-patent-litigation-report/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 20:18:29+00:00

Document:
Like March, April filings were slow as NPEs waited for the TC Heartland decision from SCOTUS. Frequent filers included Electronic Communication Technologies, Hawk Technology, Internet Media Interactive Corporation, Landmark Technology, Reflection Code, Smart Authentication IP and Soverain.
Product Association Technologies LLC v. Clique Media Group, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
IAC Search and Media, Inc.
Patent: 6,154,738 (Methods and apparatus for disseminating product information via the internet using universal product codes).
Fall Line Patents, LLC v. American Airlines Group, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 9,454,748 (System and method for data management).
Reflection Code LLC v. Energizer Holdings, Inc., (E.D. Mich.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 7,963,446 (Bar code device); 8,733,657 (Barcode device); and 8,763,907 (Barcode device).
Dalen Products, Inc. v. Six Hogs, LLC, (E.D. Tenn.).
Patent: 5,901,491 (Owl with movable head).
Smart Authentication IP, LLC v. Autodesk Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 8,082,213 (Method and system for personalized online security).
No Magic, Inc. v. Atos IT Solutions and Services Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Atos IT Solutions and Services Inc.
Bull HN Information Systems, Inc.
Patent: 8,929,552 (Electronic information and cryptographic key management system).
Soverain IP, LLC v. CenturyLink, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Spectrum Management Holding Company, LLC f/k/a Time Warner Cable, Inc.
Patents: 5,708,780 (Internet server access control and monitoring systems); 6,212,634 (Certifying authorization in computer networks); 7,191,447 (Managing transfers of information in a communications network); 8,606,900 (Method and system for counting web access requests); 8,935,706 (Managing transfers of information in a communications network); and 6,279,112 (Controlled transfer of information in computer networks).
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC vs. Delta Community Credit Union, (N.D. Ga.; N.D. Miss; M.D. Tenn.) (multiple cases).
Mantis Communications, LLC v. Papa Murphy’s Holdings, Inc. et al, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Papa Murphy’s Company Stores, Inc.
Patents: 7,403,788 (System and method to initiate a mobile data communication utilizing a trigger system); 7,792,518 (System and method to initiate a mobile data communication utilizing a trigger system); 8,131,262 (System and method to initiate a mobile data communication utilizing a trigger system); 8,437,784 (System and method to initiate a mobile data communication utilizing a trigger system); 8,761,732 (System and method to initiate a mobile data communication utilizing a trigger system); 8,938,215 (System and method to initiate a mobile data communication utilizing a trigger system); and 9,092,803 (System and method to initiate a mobile data communication utilizing a trigger system).
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. United Airlines, Inc., (N.D. Ill.).
Patent: 6,049,835 (System for providing easy access to the World Wide Web utilizing a published list of preselected Internet locations together with their unique multi-digit jump codes).
Electronic Communication Technologies, LLC v. C&A Marketing, Inc., (S.D. Fla.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 9,373,261 (Secure notification messaging with user option to communicate with delivery or pickup representative).
Landmark Technology, LLC v. GourmetGiftBaskets.com, Inc., (S.D. Cal.).
realZOOM LLC v. Calendar Holdings LLC d/b/a Calendars.com, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 7,774,712 (Methods and systems for displaying an enlarged image).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.