Source: https://baronandbudd.com/mesothelioma-lawyer/mesothelioma-appeals/
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 21:09:31+00:00

Document:
When it comes to handling lawsuits at the appellate level, Baron & Budd has more experience and resources than the typical mesothelioma law firm.
In a mesothelioma lawsuit, there are times when a verdict will be sent to a higher court for review. This higher court is known as the court of appeals. Asbestos companies sometimes appeal cases in an attempt to either reduce the amount of the mesothelioma verdict or have it totally thrown out so that the company does not have to pay it.
A client can still achieve a positive outcome in a case even if it goes to the appellate level.
The mesothelioma lawyers with Baron & Budd have a long track record of successfully protecting their verdicts once they reach the appellate level. We have not only successfully protected the majority of our verdicts across the country throughout our history, we have protected nearly all of our California verdicts that have been appealed. This is a track record very few law firms can claim.
During the entirety of our 35-year history, the mesothelioma attorneys with Baron & Budd have accumulated a great deal of experience regarding how virtually every state’s appeals court system works. We have both appealed and succeeded in many mesothelioma cases, and we are prepared to fight for our clients throughout the entire process of their cases. We will never be intimidated by companies trying to use the appeals system to dodge responsibility for their actions by appealing a mesothelioma lawsuit.
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood, 209 Ariz. 137, 98 P.3d 572 (Ariz. App. Div. 2 2004).
Valenzuela v. Brown, 186 Ariz. 105, 919 P.2d 1376 (Ariz. App. Div. 2 1996).
Norris v. Crane Co., No. B196031, 2008 WL 638361 (Cal. App. 2 Dist. Mar 11, 2008) (unpublished).
Nelson v. Superior Court, 144 Cal.App.4th 689, 50 Cal.Rptr.3d 684 (Cal. App. 3 Dist. 2006).
Rando v. Anco Insul., Inc., 2007-2093 (La.App. 1 Cir. 5/2/08), 2008 WL 2068080 (unpublished).
Emery v. Owens-Corporation, 2000-2144 (La. App. 1 Cir. 11/9/01), 813 So.2d 441, writ denied, 2002-0635 (La. 5/10/02), 815 So.2d 842.
Ford v. Pulmosan Safety Equipment Corp., 52 A.D.3d 710, 862 N.Y.S.2d 56 (N.Y. App. Div. 2008).
Keene Corp. v. Gardner, 837 S.W.2d 224 (Tex. App. – Dallas 1992, writ denied).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.