Source: http://www.goldsmithchambers.com/barristers/dr-anton-van-dellen/family=practice-areas/
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 20:59:02+00:00

Document:
Interested in instructing Dr van Dellen?
Anton originally qualified as a medical doctor and worked as a registrar in Neurosurgery, before coming up to Christ Church, University of Oxford, as a Rhodes Scholar where he completed his DPhil under Professor Sir Colin Blakemore.
Anton completed pupillage at a leading Intellectual Property chambers before working for a North London firm of solicitors, where he rapidly gained a wide international client base, including from Eastern Europe, Pakistan and West Africa.
Doktor Anton van Dellen to angielki adwokat (barrister) specjalizujący się w sprawach cywilnych oraz gospodarczych.
Przed rozpoczęciem praktyki adwokackiej, Dr van Dellen pracował jako lekarz medycyny- specjalista neurochirurg, a następnie ukończył doktorat na Uniwersytecie w Oxfordzie. Doktor van Dellen był także wykładowcą na Uniwersytecie w Oxford (Collegue Christ Church).
Doktor van Dellen ma szerokie doświadczenie w prowadzeniu postępowań przed sądem apelacyjnym, jak i Sądem Najwyższym. Pracuje w zespole prawnym Goldsmith Chambers.
Kontakt w jezyku polskim pod nr: 07749 068 541. Doktor van Dellen mastały dostęp do polskiego tłumacza.
Daktaras Anton van Dellen yra Anglijos advokatas (baristeris), kurio specializacija – civiliniai ir komerciniai klausimai. Prieš pradėdamas teisinę praktiką, daktaras van Dellen dirbo medicinos gydytoju neurochirurgijos srityje, o paskui baigė doktorantūrą Oksfordo universitete. Taip pat daktaras van Dellen dėstė Oksfordo universitete (Kristaus bažnyčios koledže).
Daktaras van Dellen turi daug patirties teismo procesuose Aukštajame ir Apeliaciniame teismuose. Kreipkitės į mus lietuvių kalba telefono numeriu: 07575 161166. Daktaras van Dellen gali naudotis lietuvių kalbos vertėjo paslaugomis.
Anton van Dellen, Martin Khoshdel, Sara Wyeth. “Bone of contention.” New Law Journal (2015).
Anton van Dellen, Sara Wyeth. “Stitched Up? Manufacture at your risk.” New Law Journal (2015).
Anton van Dellen, Matt Green. “Difficulties in consent: applying the Mental Capacity Act.” BMJ (2013).
Anton van Dellen, Matt Green. “Perils of Report Writing.” BMJ (2013).
Saleem Tariq, Anton van Dellen. “A Push into a Fairer Civil Future.” New Law Journal (2013).
Anton van Dellen. “GMC: time to reconsider the civil standard of proof.” Ann Roy Coll Surg (2013) 95(2): 56-58.
Anton van Dellen. “The Aftershock: the damage following the removal of expert witness immunity in Jones v Kaney.” New Law Journal (2011) 161:7488.
L v CFC  EWHC 236 – whether a decision on appeal was ultra vires.
A v Alexander  EWHC 3106 – evidential threshold for declaratory relief.
I v SRA  EWHC 957 –failure to comply with a duty of full and frank disclosure.
M v HM Asst Coroner for Beds & Luton  EWHC 3477 – test for Article 2 inquest.
B v SRA  EWHC 892: The scope of the judicial exemption to the Equality Act 2010.
Farooq v SSHD  EWHC 2386: The scope of the evidential flexibility rules and guidance.
Singh v SSHD  EWCA Civ 492: Guidance given by court for appealing apparent bias.
Khalique v Aktar  EWHC 3943: Freezing injunction in support of proceedings abroad.
Kialka v Home Office  EWHC 4143: Costs recoverability when cash forfeiture challenged.
Khuram  EWCA Civ 913: Wasted costs not awarded where no loss caused.
Memon  EWHC 205 (Admin);  All ER (D) 92 (Feb): Whether requirement to produce documents constitutes additional unlawful threshold.
CP  EWCA Civ 1720: The correct approach to a statutory test and sequence in which considerations should be considered.
Confectia v Miss Mania  EWCA Civ 1484: Measuring foreseeable damages under Hadley v Baxendale principles and where risk should be allocated.
S v Health Education England  EWHC 3696 (Admin);  All ER (D) 184 (Nov): Judicial Review of procedural impropriety and procedural unfairness.
AK  EWCA Civ 112: Approach to the genuineness of documents and who bears the burden of proof.
R v London Borough of Lewisham  EWCA Civ 1800: Whether laches is available in a defence to a claim for possession and the weight to be given to convictions.
S v Buckinghamshire County Council  EWCA Civ 436: Adducing new expert evidence at appeal stage of proceedings.

References: EWCA 
 EWCA 
 EWCA 
 EWCA 
 EWCA 
 EWCA 
 EWCA