Source: http://pa.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20180326_0001944.PA.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 20:38:15+00:00

Document:
Appellant, Patrick Gorman, appeals from the judgment of sentence of 11½ to 23 months' incarceration, followed by 5 years' probation, imposed after he was convicted of theft and related offenses. Appellant solely challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain his convictions. After careful review, we affirm.
On April 24, 2015, a criminal information was filed against Appellant, charging him with two counts of theft by unlawful taking, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3921(a); one count of receiving stolen property, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3925(a); and two counts of misapplication of entrusted property, 18 Pa.C.S. § 4113(a). These charges stemmed from Appellant's creating a veteran's honor guard that appeared at numerous funerals, and then mishandling and misusing donations provided to that honor guard. Appellant waived his right to a jury trial and proceeded to a non-jury trial on January 6, 2016. On January 12, 2016, the court convicted Appellant of the above-stated charges. On April 7, 2016, Appellant was sentenced to the terms of incarceration and probation stated supra, as well as restitution in the amount of $44, 312.93.
(c) intended - that is, it was his conscious object - to deprive American Legion Post 935 and/or 1810 of the use and benefit of certain property, namely money and/or checks.
(b) [Appellant] received, retained or disposed of the property knowing or believing it had in fact been stolen from the American Legion Post 935 and/or 1810.
(b) [Appellant] applied or disposed of the property in a manner he knew was unlawful and involved substantial risk of detriment to the owner or the person for whose benefit the property was entrusted.
In reviewing a sufficiency of the evidence claim, we must determine whether the evidence admitted at trial, as well as all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom, when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict winner, are sufficient to support all elements of the offense. Commonwealth v. Moreno, 14 A.3d 133 (Pa. Super. 2011). Additionally, we may not reweigh the evidence or substitute our own judgment for that of the fact finder. Commonwealth v. Hartzell, 988 A.2d 141 (Pa. Super. 2009). The evidence may be entirely circumstantial as long as it links the accused to the crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreno, supra at 136.
Commonwealth v. Koch, 39 A.3d 996, 1001 (Pa. Super. 2011).

References: § 3921
 § 3925
 § 4113
 v. 
 v. 
 v.