Source: https://governmentslaves.news/2015/04/10/31-facts-about-the-criminal-internal-revenue-service/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 08:23:43+00:00

Document:
Is the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury?
At footnote 23 in the case of Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281 (1979), the U.S. Supreme Court admitted that no organic Act for the IRS could be found, after they searched for such an Act all the way back to the Civil War, which ended in the year 1865 A.D. The Guarantee Clausein the U.S. Constitution guarantees the Rule of Law to all Americans (we are to be governed by Law and not by arbitrary bureaucrats). SeeArticle IV, Section 4. Since there was no organic Act creating it, IRS is not a lawful organization.
If not an organization within the U.S. Department of the Treasury, then what exactly is the IRS?
By what legal authority, if any, has the IRS established offices inside the 50 States of the Union?
Can IRS legally show “Department of the Treasury” on their outgoing mail?
Does the U.S. Department of Justice have power of attorney to represent the IRS in federal court?
Were the so-called 14th and 16th amendments properly ratified?
Where are the statutes that create a specific liability for federal income taxes?
After a worker authorizes a payroll officer to withhold taxes, typically by completing Form W‑4, the payroll officer then becomes a withholding agent who is legally and specifically liable for payment of all taxes withheld from that worker’s paycheck. Until such time as those taxes are paid in full into the Treasury of the United States, the withholding agent is the only party who is legally liable for those taxes, notthe worker. See IRC section 7809 (“Treasury of the United States”).
Can a federal regulation create a specific liability, when no specific liability is created by the corresponding statute?
“[A]n administrative agency may not create a criminal offense or any liability not sanctioned by the lawmaking authority, especially a liability for a tax or inspection fee.” See Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Acker, 361 U.S. 87, 4 L.Ed.2d 127, 80 S.Ct. 144 (1959), andIndependent Petroleum Corp. v. Fly, 141 F.2d 189 (5th Cir. 1944) as cited at 2 Am Jur 2d, p. 129, footnote 2 (1962 edition) [bold emphasis added]. However, this cite from American Jurisprudence has been removed from the 1994 edition of that legal encyclopedia.
The federal regulations create an income tax liability for what specific classes of people?
How many classes of citizens are there, and how did this number come to be?
The pertinent court cases have defined the term “United States” in these Clauses to mean “States United”, and the full term means “Citizen ofONE OF the States United”. See People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337 (1870); Judge Pablo De La Guerra signed the California Constitution of 1849, when California first joined the Union. Similar terms are found in the Diversity Clause at Article III, Section 2, Clause 1, and in the Privileges and Immunities Clause at Article IV, Section 2, Clause 1. Prior to the Civil War, there was only one (1) class of Citizens under American Law. See the holding in Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914‑915 (1918), for definitive authority on this key point.
Can one be a State Citizen, without also being a federal citizen?
Several courts have already recognized our Right to be State Citizens without also becoming federal citizens. For excellent examples, seeState v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380, 6 S. 602 (1889) and Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala. 155, 48 S. 788, 791 (1909). The Maine Supreme Court also clarified the issue by explaining our “Right of Election” or “freedom of choice,” namely, our freedom to choose between two different forms of government. See 44 Maine 518 (1859), Hathaway, J. dissenting.
Who was Frank Brushaber, and why was his U.S. Supreme Court case so important?
T.D. 2313 is crucial evidence proving that the income tax provisions of the IRC are municipal law, with no territorial jurisdiction inside the 50 States of the Union. The U.S. Secretary of the Treasury who approved T.D. 2313 had no authority to extend the holding in the Brushabercase to anyone or anything not a proper Party to that court action.
What is a “Withholding agent”?
What is a “Withholding Exemption Certificate”?
What is “tax evasion” and who might be guilty of this crime?
If Congress were authorized to create national corporations, such a questionable authority would invade States’ rights reserved to them by the Tenth Amendment, namely, the right to charter their own domestic corporations. The repeal of Prohibition left the Tenth Amendmentunqualified. See the Constantine case supra.
Why does IRS Form 1040 not require a Notary Public to notarize a taxpayer’s signature?
Does the term “United States” have multiple legal meanings and, if so, what are they?
Is the term “income” defined in the IRC and, if not, where is it defined?
What is municipal law, and are the IRC’s income tax provisions municipal law, or not?
One of the most famous pieces of evidence is a letter from a Connecticut Congresswoman, summarizing the advice of legal experts employed by the Congressional Research Service and the Legislative Counsel. Their advice confirmed that the meaning of “State” at IRC section 3121(e) isrestricted to the named territories and possessions of D.C., Guam, Virgin Islands, American Samoa, and Puerto Rico.
What does it mean if my State is not mentioned in any of the federal income tax statutes?
The general rule is that federal government powers must be expressed and enumerated. For example, the U.S. Constitution is a grant ofenumerated powers. If a power is not enumerated in the U.S. Constitution, then Congress does not have any authority to exercise that power. This rule is tersely expressed in the Ninth Amendment, in the Bill of Rights.
In what other ways is the IRC deliberately vague, and what are the real implications for the average American?
Has Title 26 of the United States Code (“U.S.C.”) ever been enacted into positive law, and what are the legal implications if Title 26 has notbeen enacted into positive law?
Even though all federal judges may know the secret meaning of “this title”, they are men and women of UNcommon intelligence. The U.S. Supreme Court’s test for vagueness is violated whenever men and women of common intelligence must necessarily guess at the meaning and differ as to the application of a vague statute. See Connally et al. v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 (1926). Thus, federal judges are applying the wrong test for vagueness.
What federal courts are authorized to prosecute income tax crimes?
This question must be addressed in view of the Answer to Question 22 above. Although it may appear that certain statutes in the IRC grant original jurisdiction to federal district courts, to institute prosecutions of income tax crimes, none of the statutes found in subtitle F has ever taken effect. For this reason, those statutes do not authorize the federal courts to do anything at all. As always, appearances can be very deceiving. Remember the Wizard of Oz or the mad tea party of Alice in Wonderland?
It is very important to appreciate the fact that these courts are not the same as the United States District Courts (“USDC”). The DCUS areconstitutional courts that originate in Article III of the U.S. Constitution. The USDC are territorial tribunals, or legislative courts, that originate in Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution, also known as the Territory Clause.
This author’s OPENING BRIEF to the Eighth Circuit on behalf of the Defendant in USA v. Gilbertson cites numerous court cases that have already clarified the all important distinction between these two classes of federal district courts. For example, in Balzac v. Porto Rico, 258 U.S. 298 at 312 (1922), the high Court held that the USDC belongs in the federal Territories. This author’s OPENING BRIEF to the Ninth Circuit inMitchell v. AOL Time Warner, Inc. et al. develops this theme in even greater detail; begin reading at section “7(e)”.
Are federal judges required to pay income taxes on their pay, and what are the real implications if they do pay taxes on their pay?
Answer: No. Federal judges who are appointed to preside on the District Courts of the United States –- the Article III constitutional courts –- are immune from any taxation of their pay, by constitutional mandate.
The Separation of Powers principle is succinctly defined in Williams v. United States, 289 U.S. 553 (1933); however, in that decision the Supreme Court erred by defining “Party” to mean only Plaintiffs in Article III, contrary to the definition of “Party” that is found inBouvier’s Law Dictionary (1856).
In front of a class of law students at the University of Arizona in January of 1997, Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist openly admitted thatall federal judges are currently paying taxes on their judicial pay. This writer was an eyewitness to that statement by the Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court -– the highest Court in the land.
Can federal grand juries issue valid indictments against illegal tax protesters?
Strictly speaking, the term “illegal” cannot modify the noun “protesters” because to do so would constitute a violation of the First Amendmentin the Bill of Rights, one of the most magnificent constitutional provisions ever written.
Do IRS agents ever tamper with federal grand juries, and how is this routinely done?
Finally, there is ample evidence that IRS agents bribe U.S. Attorneys, federal judges, and even the Office of the President with hugekickbacks, every time a criminal indictment is issued by a federal grand jury against an illegal tax protester. (See the Answer to Question 25 above.) These kick‑backs range from $25,000 to $35,000 in CASH! They also violate the Anti-Kickback Act of 1986, which penalizes the payment of kickbacks from federal government subcontractors. See 41 U.S.C. 8701 et seq.
What is “The Kickback Racket,” and where can I find evidence of its existence?
Subsequently, this writer submitted a lawful request, under the Freedom of Information Act, for a certified list of all payments that had ever been made under color of these delegation orders in the IRM. Mr. Mark L. Zolton, a tax law specialist within the Internal Revenue Service,responded on IRS letterhead, transmitted via U.S. Mail, that few records existed for these “awards” because most of them were paid in cash!
Obviously, the federal judge — John M. Roll — did NOT want the grand jury in that case to know anything about these kickbacks. They found out anyway, because of the manner in which this writer defended that small business, as its Vice President for Legal Affairs.
Can the IRS levy bank accounts without a valid court order?
Do federal income tax revenues pay for any government services and, if so, which government services are funded by federal income taxes?
How can the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”) help me to answer other key tax questions?
Where can I find more information, and still protect my privacy?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.