Source: https://www.lasvegasshootingattorneys.com/our-experience
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 01:59:14+00:00

Document:
The Law Offices of Alexander M. Schack has extensive experience helping injury and disaster victims who have undergone horrible tragedy. Our firm has represented gas leak victims who suffered severe physical injuries and fire victims who lost their homes, and we have a proven track record of getting results for our clients. Mr. Schack was lead counsel against Sempra Energy in the largest fire case in California history, the 2007 San Diego Wildfire litigation. Ultimately, the litigation resulted in the recovery of over 2 billion in settlements for fire victims, many who lost everything as a result of the fires. While we can't change what happened, we have the experience to help you get back on your feet as best as possible.
Teri Boland, et al. v. Sierra Pacific Power Company, et al.
Filed on behalf of plaintiffs affected by 2011 fires in Reno, NV and Caughlin, NV. Settlement of $4,000,000.
Member of Plaintiff Control Group and Discovery Coordinator for over 2,000 claims filed after SDG&E and Cox equipment allegedly started three wildfires in October 2007, burning over 1,000 homes.
Member of Plaintiffs’ Counsel for consumer class of indirect purchasers alleging consumer protection laws and false advertising in the manufacture, sale and marketing of Bayer Women’s Low Dose Aspirin. Settlement of $15,000,000 finalized in 2014.
Kleen Products, LLC et al. v. Packaging Corporation of America, et al.
Member of Plaintiffs’ Counsel in nationwide Sherman Act class action for direct purchasers involving price fixing and supply restriction claims against the major integrated producers of containerboard and corrugated products defendants settlements of $350,000,000 pending.
Arthur Garabedian, et al. v. Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Company, et al.
Counsel for class of 2,000,000 cellular telephone users in Los Angeles and Orange Counties in antitrust case. Settlement of $175,000,000.
James Lastra, et al. v. Micron Technology, Inc., et al.
Counsel for consumer class of indirect purchasers of DRAM alleging price fixing and tampering with prices. Settlement of approximately $190,000,000.
Member of Plaintiffs’ Counsel in MDL 1673 (remanded) and multi-state action involving monopolization and concerted conduct regarding abuse of Intellectual property rights. Settlement of $8,150,000.
Jeff Lohman, et al. v. General Motors Corporation, et al.
Counsel for consumer class of new car purchasers alleging antitrust violations in policies implemented to deter importation of less expensive Canadian automobiles to the U.S. Settlement of $30,000,000 finalized in 2012.
Counsel for consumers who indirectly purchased LCD products for inflated prices as a result of an alleged price-fixing conspiracy. Settlement of $571,000,000.
Brannning, et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc., et al.
Counsel for retail consumers who purchased Apple products that used an estimated purchase price and Apple resellers that were harmed as a result of Apple’s unfair trade and business practices.
Wallace, et al. v. Hi-Tech Marketing, Inc., et al.
Co-Counsel for consumer class of indirect purchasers of smokeless tobacco alleging monopolization and antitrust violations by producer of 90% of the moist snuff sold in the U.S. Class certified in 2004. $96,000,000 settlement.
Member of Plaintiffs’ Counsel for consumer class alleging violations of state consumer protection, false advertising and unfair competition statutes in the sale, marketing and distribution of the Hydroxycut products. Settlement of $14,000,000.
Helen Polonitza, et al. v. Medallion Products, Inc., et al.
Counsel for nationwide consumer class of purchasers of Liquid Lense, alleging false advertising of the efficacy of the product. Defendant agreed to disgorge and refund up to $5,779,410 to the class.
Alan Hemphill, et al. v. San Diego Association of Realtors, et al.
Counsel for consumer class of 28,000 local real estate Multiple Listing Service (MLS) users alleging price fixing of MLS support services against MLS providers and five associations of realtors. Permanent injunction and $6,000,000 settlement.
John Bahl, et al. v. Metabolife International, Inc.
Counsel for consumer class of Metabolife users alleging illegal advertising policies and price fixing. Permanent injunction and coupon settlement in excess of $10,000,000 for class finalized.
Member of Plaintiffs’ Counsel in civil consumer protection class action for violations of the California’s Sherman Food, Drug and Cosmetic Law, Unfair Competition Law and False Advertising Law in the misbranding and misrepresentation in connection with the sale and marketing of certain Kashi consumer food products. Pending.
Telet Martin v. First International Bank, et al.
Counsel for customer who alleged bank manager borrowed $20,000 in exchange for preferential treatment on loan application, and failed to repay same. Settlement $20,000.
Steve Johnson, et al. v. Cox Communications, Inc.
Counsel for class of digital cable subscribers alleging false advertising of “on demand”movies. Case settled for $826,000 in free movies to class.
Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel to recover losses sustained by Plaintiffs as a result of the negligent operation by Defendants in maintaining and operating their electrical equipment in a reliable manner which resulted in the 2011 Southern California blackout.
Counsel for class of employees who were deprived the benefit of their stock options when a division of Qualcomm was sold to Ericsson. Settlement $11,000,000.
7-Eleven OFFF, et al. v. The Southland Corp., et al.
Counsel for a class of approximately 1,200 California 7-Eleven franchise owners in a breach of contract/franchise dispute action against The Southland Corp., McLane and others. Settlement $32,000,000.
Lawndale Medical Clinic, et al. v. Bay Area Cellular Telephone Co., et al.
Counsel for class of 900,000 cellular telephone users in San Francisco Bay Area in antitrust case. $35,000,000 Settlement.
Joseph Quattrini, et al. v. Pana-Pacific, et al.
counsel for eight businesses in complex antitrust litigation against numerous large corporations including Los Angeles Cellular Telephone Company and AirTouch Communications. Confidential settlement.
Harry Betts, et al. v. Raymond James & Associates, et al.
Counsel for a group of elderly investors in breach of fiduciary duty/elder abuse case. Class certified in the interests of justice despite only approximately 10-20 members. Case settled for $185,000.
Counsel for plaintiff in legal malpractice case relating to the failure to reasonably settle an accounting malpractice case which resulted in a substantial adverse judgment against the accountant. Girardi & Keese represented plaintiff in related insurance bad faith cases. Settled for $1,250,000.
Franchise dispute between parent company of 7-Eleven and franchisee relating to failure to follow procedures during the Northridge earthquake. Despite summary judgment, counsel was able to obtain a rare stay of execution of the commercial unlawful detainer ruling during the almost two year pendency of the appeal, allowing the franchisee time to transition her occupation while still supporting her family.
Member of Plaintiffs’ Counsel in consumer class action in connection with security breach of Target’s systems. Pending.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.