Source: http://kirschenbaumesq.com/article/martin-schackner-appellant-against-breslin-realty-development-corp-appellee-11-cv-2734jsed-bankr-adv-proc-no-809-08096dte
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 22:34:49+00:00

Document:
Thaler & Gertler, LLP, East Meadow, NY.
For Appellee: Michael D. Brofman, Esq., Weiss & Zarett, P.C., New Hyde Park, NY.
the Bankruptcy Court is AFFIRMED and the Debtor's appeal is DENIED.
relevant factual disputes are noted.
represent him in that suit.
& DeGroat Real Estate ("Smith & DeGroat) as an associate real estate broker.
were all paid from Mrs. Schackner's account.
the Debtor individually or with the Debtor through Landmark.
accountant; however, no records were produced in response to these requests.
statement to any of his filings in the adversarial proceeding.
not with the actual documents.
returns for 2008, or any Quicken records for 2008.
returns for any corporate entity which is owned and/or controlled by the Debtor.
The Debtor did not produce any documents in response to the Request.
which the Debtor's financial condition could be ascertained. Breslin Realty Dev.
(Bankr. E.D.N.Y. Apr. 7, 2011). The Debtor appealed.
are reviewed de novo. See Momentum Mfg. Co., 25 F.3d at 1136.
v. Giammettei, 34 F.3d 51, 54-55 (2d Cir. 1994)); see also Hanover Direct, Inc.
reviews the Bankruptcy Court's grant of summary judgment de novo.
judgment as a matter of law." Harvis Trien & Beck, P.C. v. Fed. Home Loan Mortg.
(1986)); see also Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247, 106 S. Ct.
in favor of the party against whom summary judgment is sought." McLee v.
Chrysler Corp., 109 F.3d 130, 134 (2d Cir. 1997).
fact rests on the party seeking summary judgment." Id.; see also Adickes v. S.H.
summary judgment. Knight v. U.S. Fire Ins. Co., 804 F.2d 9, 12 (2d Cir. 1986).
judgment, courts exercise even greater caution").
to it. Walters v. Sawyer (In re Sawyer), 130 B.R. 384, 392 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
1991) (quoting Grogan v. Grogan, 498 U.S. 279, 287, 111 S. Ct. 654, 112 L. Ed.
246; Krohn v. Frommann (In re Frommann), 153 B.R. 113, 116 (Bankr. E.D.N.Y.
to reconstruct the debtor's business transactions." Sethi, 250 B.R. at 837-38.
Debtor's financial condition and business transactions. See Jacobowitz, 309 B.R.
the party objecting to discharge. See In re Martin, 554 F.2d 55, 58 (2d Cir.
absence of comprehensive records. See Pimpinella, 133 B.R. at 698.
the debtor's financial condition and material business transactions.'"
financial records. See, e.g., Nisselson v. Wolfson (In re Wolfson), 152 B.R.
categories of information may be essential to determining a debtor's history."
determine the Debtor's financial condition and recent business transactions.
relevant to the Â§ 727(a)(3) inquiry." Miller v. Pulos (In re Pulos), 168 B.R.
Hughes), 873 F.2d 262, 264 (11th Cir. 1989)).
at Bates numbers 447 to 460.
transactions from the proffered records.
that his failure to keep records was justified." Jacobowitz, 309 B.R. at 438.
meet his burden to withstand summary judgment.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.