Source: http://chinalawlib.org.cn/LunwenShow.aspx?CID=20081224141555500179&AID=20170725184728540970&FID=20081224141145450128
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 09:00:40+00:00

Document:
Article 24 If a valid judgment of divorce made by the people's court does not involve the visit right and if the parties concerned bring a separate lawsuit over the visit right, the people's court shall accept the case.
Article 25 During the course when the parties perform the valid judgment, ruling or mediation document, if a party concerned requests for suspending the exercise of the visit right, the people's court shall make a ruling if it believes it is necessary to suspend the exercise of the visit right after it consults the opinions of both parties. After the circumstance for the suspension of the visit right disappears, the people's court shall, upon application of the party concerned, inform him （her） that he （she） may resume the exercise of the visit right.
In this case, the introduction of the visitation supervisor system to the hearing of cases regarding disputes over visitation right was conducive to identifying the true situations of the parties and their families, resolving conflicts and disputes, reflecting judicial fairness and openness, and ensuring that the person entitled to visitation properly fulfill visitation right according to the law so as to protect the lawful rights and interests of the minors and make them healthily grow. According to follow-up tracking, the enforcement of this case was normal and the tension between both families was eased. This case is the first case that applies the system of visitation supervisor across the country. It is a beneficial practice in which the people's court engages in social administration innovation, integrates resources from various parties and on the basis of social forces, resolves case conflicts and disputes, and maintains and safeguards the lawful rights and interests of the minors and it also provides new experience for further improving the system of trial of minors.
Article 35 Women's right of self-determination in marriage and divorce shall not be interfered with. During the litigation for divorce, the husband and his relatives shall not infringe upon and restrict the wife's personal freedom, and shall not infringe upon her right of residence.
The marriage law of China（2001） first proposed the concept of visitation, and then established the system of visitation right. It is not only good for maintenance the minor children' physical and mental health, but also good for balance the interests of both sides of divorced parents. The establishment of the visitation right system is also a great progress of the marriage and family law in our country, making China's marriage and family law system more perfect. However, there are many problems of the visitation right in the exercise that should be improved in practice.
The amendment of marriage law has established the system of visitation right which was not founded in marriage and family system before. However, it is very difficult to realize the visitation right in the practice since then. Personal right has its own characteristics, sharply different with other legal rights such as real right. Under the principles of fully considering the affects of traditional culture and the characteristics of visitation right, the visitation right system should be further perfected.
In the amendment of marriage law is established the system of visitation right,with makes up a gap in the marriage Law. In the legal provisions, visitation right is parent's right when not acquiring direct fostering right after their divorce. From the legal in the relation between parents in the children. We can know that visitation right is one existed in the non-normal relation between parents and children. Not limited to the divorce parents. At the meantime, it is the parents' right and obligation. Or children have also the rights demanding their parent to visit them. The visiting system should be further perfected in the principle of persisting heavily in the children' benefits and giving considerations to parent.
Washington statute providing that any person may petition court for visitation at any time, and that court may order visitation rights for any person when visitation may serve best interest of child, violated substantive due process rights of mother, as applied to permit paternal grandparents, following death of children' father, to obtain increased court-ordered visitation, in excess of what mother had thought appropriate, based solely on state trial judge's disagreement with mother as to whether children would benefit from such increased visitation; at minimum, trial judge had to accord special weight to mother's own determination of her children' best interests.
Alleged conduct by county department of social services and its staff in encouraging and assisting in a surreptitious relocation of non-custodial father's minor children to another state with their custodial mother, and procuring taxpayer money to do so through a voucher from the local government on behalf of the children' mother, after state family court determined that father had neglected the children and awarded sole custody to the mother, was not so arbitrary, shocking, or egregious as to deprive father of substantive due process; father was free to travel to see his children in order to exercise his visitation rights.
Action for construction of provisions of Connecticut divorce decree providing for custody of minor children and rights of visitation did not, in view of Connecticut statute permitting modification of custody decree by courts of that state and fact that Connecticut court had expressly reserved jurisdiction in case, raise full faith and credit issue.
Where Florida divorce decree awarding custody of child to wife was entered by default without hearing of evidence presented on husband's behalf concerning his fitness or his claim to enjoy the association of his child, the Florida court if applied to would have had power, upon application by husband, to modify the decree in interests of the child by granting the husband the right of visitation, and hence New York court in which matter of custody was presented had power after full hearing to grant such right of visitation, and so doing did not offend full faith and credit requirements; it not being shown that the New York court exceeded limits permitted under F.S.A.
（10） The court may modify or terminate visitation rights granted pursuant to this section in any subsequent modification action upon a showing that the visitation is no longer in the best interest of the child.
（12） If a parent receives military temporary duty, deployment, activation, or mobilization orders that involve moving a substantial distance away from the military parent's residence or otherwise have a material effect on the military parent's ability to exercise residential time or visitation rights, at the request of the military parent, the court may delegate the military parent's residential time or visitation rights, or a portion thereof, to a child's family member, including a stepparent, or another person other than a parent, with a close and substantial relationship to the minor child for the duration of the military parent's absence, if delegating residential time or visitation rights is in the child's best interest. The court may not permit the delegation of residential time or visitation rights to a person who would be subject to limitations on residential time under RCW 26.09.191. The parties shall attempt to resolve disputes regarding delegation of residential time or visitation rights through the dispute resolution process specified in their parenting plan, unless excused by the court for good cause shown. Such a court-ordered temporary delegation of a military parent's residential time or visitation rights does not create separate rights to residential time or visitation for a person other than a parent.
§584.2 Family support and child custody.
（a） Discuss with the parent the alternatives for keeping the child, and determine that the parent is prepared to relinquish his or her rights and responsibilities regarding the child.
（b） Assist the parent in reaching a decision regarding the most favorable plan of action for both the parent and the child, and determine the services necessary to carry out that plan.
（c） If appropriate, inform the parent that rights of visitation may be granted to certain relatives pursuant to NRS 125C.050.
CIVIL RIGHTS - Due Process. Officer's interference with non-custodial mother's exercise of visitation rights did not violate substantive due process.
In divorce proceeding involving issue of child custody, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted divorce to defendant husband and entered order awarding him permanent custody of minor child subject to wife's right of visitation at reasonable times. On motion by wife for modification and grant of partial custody of child.
After the Abbotts, a married couple, moved to Chile and separated, the Chilean courts granted respondent wife daily care and control of their minor son, A. J. A., while awarding petitioner husband visitation rights. Mr. Abbott also had a ne exeat right to consent before Ms. Abbott could take A. J. A. out of the country under Chile Minors Law 16,618 （Minors Law 16,618）， art. 49. When Ms. Abbott brought A. J. A. to Texas without permission from Mr. Abbott or the Chilean family court, Mr. Abbott filed this suit in the Federal District Court, seeking an order requiring his son's return to Chile under the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction （Convention） and the implementing statute, the International Child Abduction Remedies Act （ICARA）， 42 U. S. C. §11601 et seq. Among its provisions, the Convention seeks “to secure the prompt return of children wrongfully removed or retained in any Contracting State,” Art. 1; provides that such “removal or retention . . . is to be considered wrongful where” “it is in breach of rights of custody attributed to a person . . . under the law of the State in which the child was [theretofore] habitually resident,” Art. 3（a）， and where “those rights [had been] actually exercised . . . or would have been so exercised but for the removal or retention,” Art. 3（b）； and defines “rights of custody” to “include . . . the right to determine the child's place of residence,” Art.5（a）。 The District Court denied relief, holding that the father's neexeat right did not constitute a “right of custody” under the Convention and, thus, that the return remedy was not authorized. The Fifth Circuit affirmed.
Boland, Mary L. Your right to child custody, visitation, and support. 2nd ed. Naperville, Ill.: Sphinx Pub., 2001.
the issues of custody and visitation arise most often in divorce proceedings and can be the biggest contest between parents.about fifty percent of marriages end in divorce,affecting about one million children every year.
The goal of this book is to help you consider your options in deciding custody, visitation, and child support questions by giving you a broad overview of the factors that courts examine when determining these issues. While every family has the same basic needs, every family is also unique. Perhaps the overriding concept in this area of law is that decisions, whether based on an agreement of the parents or determined after trials,should be made with the maximum flexibility to accommodate a particular family's needs within certain minimum guidelines.
Krause, Harry D., Family law /. St. Paul, Minn.: West Pub. Co., 1988.
Traditionally, courts have awarded sole legal custody of a child to one parent.typically, that parent also obtains physical custody. Physical custody is shared through visitation rights. Quite recently, the concept of joint and shared custody has made significant inroads on the traditional sole custody concept.
Courts usually award visitation rights to the noncustodial parent. If it would affect the child adversely, however visitation may be denied or restricted. Jurisdictions differ on the strength of showing that must be made to deny or take away visitation right.
Faraguna, Robert, Basic family law /. New York, N.Y.: Glencoe, c1993.
Visitation is a right that can be enjoyed by the noncustodial parent or a noncustodial party such as a grandparent. Often, a decree awarding custody to one parent includes provisions for visitation for the other parent. Through such visitation ,the noncustodial parent has the opportunity to see, stay with,and temporarily care for the child. Visitation is, in essence, periodic short-term custody that can amount to hours, days, or longer, as with prolonged visits during holidays from school and the summer months.
Jeffrey J. Shampo, Georgia Jurisprudence, Effect of nonpayment of support on visitation rights, June 2017 Update.
Visitation rights should not be dependent upon whether or not child support or alimony has been paid. In a former husband's contempt proceeding against his former wife, the trial court improperly conditioned the husband's obligation to make his monthly child support payment on the former wife's allowance of the husband's exercise of his visitation.
George L. Blum, Grandparents' visitation rights where child's parents are living. American Law Reports ALR 5th, 1999.
This annotation collects and analyzes the cases which determine whether, and under what circumstances, grandparents have rights of visitation with their grandchildren. A number of jurisdictions have rules, regulations, constitutional provisions, or legislative enactments directly bearing upon this subject. ?
Anne Marie Jackson, THE COMING OF AGE OF GRANDPARENT VISITATION RIGHTS, American University Law Review Winter, 1994 43 Am. U. L. Rev. 563.
As the nature of the American family changes, family law also changes. One rapidly emerging area of family law is the legal right of grandparents to visit with their grandchildren. In response to the increasing number of unmarried or divorced parents, the existence of step-families, the estrangement of extended families.
Here you can learn about child custody and parenting time （also called “visitation”） cases, how to prepare a parenting plan for you and your children, and how to get or change a court order. You can also find many resources to help you and your children through your separation or divorce.
If the judge presiding over your separation or divorce determined that you or your ex-spouse was entitled to “reasonable visitation,” this generally means that it is left to the parents of the child （you and your ex-spouse） to come up with a plan of parental visitation time.
Either after securing a parenting agreement, or if unable to agree, either parent may petition the court for child visitation or custody help. Parents who can agree to a parenting plan may file it with a court, asking the judge to approve and incorporate it into a court order on visitation and/or custody.
Do You Know Your Parental Visitation Rights?
Learn more about BICE's projects to fight for Children Rights in the world.
Oct 30, 2016 - The American Coalition for Fathers and Children （ACFC） is a non-profit organization in support of shared parenting. … in fact, their tagline is “The Best Parent is Both Parents?.” In pursuit of social and legal justice, The Children's Rights Council serves to: Protect the best interests of children in custody case.
Hague Convention on International Child Abduction: An Analysis of the Applicable Law and Institutional Framework of Fifty-One Jurisdictions and the European Union, Vol.1, pp. 329-338.
appellant with the right of reasonable visitation allowed to the respondent. It appears that the infant was…‘s complaint and granting the respondent a divorce on his cross-complaint. This judgment awarded the custody of… custody had been pronounced, asking for a modification of the terms of that order as to custody.
Abstract : The Council Regulation No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation no.1347/2000 includes, along with uniform rules settling conflicts of jurisdiction between Member States, also a number of rules to ensure the free movement within the EU area of judgments, of authentic instruments and agreements, establishing provisions on their recognition and enforcement in another member states.
Abstract : Conditioning child support payments on visitation access provides some recourse for a noncustodial parent whose former spouse unfairly denies visitation with the children of the dissolved marriage. This form of conditioning, imposed by judges and sought by parents frustrated in their attempts to see their children, has been criticized as economically and psychologically harmful to the children involved, potentially burdensome to state welfare budgets, biased against women and inconsistent and ineffective in its implementation. Those concerns are discussed in the light of the value of maintaining contact between children and their noncustodial parents and the history of the American case law and statutes on conditioning. Conditioning has never been used as a predictable element in a comprehensive program to enforce court-ordered visitation by the noncustodial parent. Such a plan is proposed as an appropriate tool which should be available to courts hearing post-decree child support and visitation disputes.
No files matched the search request ”visitation right“.
Visitation is a right that can be enjoyed by the noncustodial parent or a noncustodial party such as a grandparent. In general, the right to visit is based upon the belief that it is beneficial for the child to maintain some continuing social,emotional, and educational ties with the noncustodial parent. Visitation rights are therefore usually favored under the law. Only under extreme circumstances will visitation be curtailed or denied. The standard is that the objective best interests of the child is satisfied.

References: §584
 art. 49
 §11601
 Art. 1
 Art. 3
 Art. 3
 Art.5