Source: http://www.annalsofhealthlaw.com/annalsofhealthlaw/vol_22_issue_3?pg=32
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 11:00:21+00:00

Document:
80. C. B.S. Songs Ltd. v. Amstrad Consumer Electric Plc.,  2 A. C 605 (H.L.).
81. In England, however, privacy is not yet recognized as giving rise to an independent tort: Kaye v. Robertson,  F.S.R. 62; R v. Khan,  A. C. 558; Wainright v. Home Office,  2 A. C. 406 (H.L.). But following the introduction of the Human Rights Act of 1998, incorporating Article 8 (privacy) of the European Convention on Human Rights, English law now recognizes the values of privacy through the equitable cause of action for breach of confidence. See Gavin Phillipson & Helen Fenwick, Breach of Confidence as a Privacy Remedy in the Human Rights Act Era 63 M.L.R. 660, 661 (2000). See also Douglas v. Hello  1 A. C. 1 (H.L.).
82. Evan G. DeRenzo, Privacy and Confidentiality, in FLETCHER’S INTRODUCTION TO CLINICAL ETHICS 87-88 (John C. Fletcher, Paul A. Lombardo & Edward M. Spencer eds., University Publishing Group, Inc., 3rd ed. 2005).
83. Samuel D. Warren & Louis D. Brandeis, The Right to Privacy, 4 HARV. L. REV. 193, 195 (1890).
84. See DeRenzo, supra note 82.
85. For a detailed judicial analysis of the cause of action for breach of confidence see Attorney-General v. Guardian Newspapers Ltd., (No. 2)  1 A. C 109 (H.L.).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.