Source: http://www.jurvestnik.psu.ru/index.php/en/issue-2-32-2016?id=2272
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 15:30:33+00:00

Document:
Annotation: Introduction: the article deals with the essence of the obligation specific performance principle and its role in the development of legislation in the Republic of Tajikistan. Purpose: the author analyzes and compares various approaches to defining the legal essence of the principle of specific performance of a contract. Methods: the following methods form the methodological basis of this research: a dialectical method, synthesis, analysis, a comparative legal method, and a system approach. Results: the author believes that rules should be established by legislation according to which specific performance of an obligation is first of all expressed in committing acts which constitute its subject. In the conditions of commodity-money relations, it is important for the creditor to get from the debtor the whole volume of the outstanding obligation. The main aim of the obligation specific performance principle must be to provide the creditor with one of the ways to protect his legal rights and interests so he has the right to compel the debtor to execution of his contractual obligations until the moment the creditor prefers his interests to be satisfied by means of pecuniary indemnity. Thus, the essence of the obligation specific performance principle has to be expressed in the establishment of a possibility for the creditor to use compulsion against the debtor. The possibility of compulsory execution has to only be acknowledged for the creditor. It means that the subject of the obligation remains invariable until the creditor agrees to terminate the contract and receive pecuniary indemnity. Conclusions: in the conditions of market economy, when the autonomy of will of the parties in economic relations is proclaimed to be the basic principle of civil law, bilateral obligatory application of the obligation specific performance principle has no right to existence.
Bogdanova E. E. Printsip real'nogo ispolnenija objazatel'stva v dogovorakh kupli-prodazhi i postavki: problema realizatsii [The Principle of the Real Obligation Performance in Sale and Delivery Contracts: Challenge of Implementation]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika – Law and Economics. 2005. № 3. Pp. 31–35. (In Russ.).
Braginskiy M. I., Vitrjanskiy V. V. Dogovornoe pravo. Kniga pervaja: Obshhie polozheniya [Contract Law. Book One: General Provisions]. Moscow, 2001. 847 p. (In Russ.).
Venediktov A. V. Grazhdansko-pravovaya okhrana socialisticheskoy sobstvennosti [Civil Law Protection of Socialist Property]. Moscow, 1954. 267 p. (In Russ.).
Gavze F. I. Printsip real'nogo ispolneniya dogovornykh obyazatel'stv v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave i praktika ego primeneniya [The Principle of Specific Performance of Contractual Obligations in the Soviet Civil Law and Practice]. Uchenye zapiski Belorusskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Proceedings of the BelarusianStateUniversity. Minsk, 1955. Issue 25. Pp. 79–103. (In Russ.).
Erakhtina O. S. Pravovye printsipy i normy o prinuditel'nom ispolnenii dogovornykh obyazatel'stv [Legal Principles and Norms on Compulsory Performance of Contractual Obligations]. Zakony Rossii: opyt, analiz, praktika – Laws of Russia: Experience, Analysis, Practice. 2012. Issue 12. Pp. 50–55. (In Russ.).
Ioffe O. S. Obyazatel'stvennoe pravo [Law of Obligations]. Moscow, 1975. 880 p. (In Russ.).
Ioffe O. S., Tolstoy Ju. K. Osnovy sovetskogo grazhdanskogo zakonodatel'stva [Bases of the Soviet Civil Legislation]. Leningrad, 1962. 216 p. (In Russ.).
Karapetov A. G. Isk o prisuzhdenii k ispolneniju objazatel'stva v nature. [The Claim for Enforcement of the Obligation in Kind]. Moscow, 2003. 190 p. (In Russ.).
Krasnov N. I. Real'noe ispolnenie dogovornykh obyazatel'stv mezhdu socialisticheskimi organizatsiyami [Specific Performance of Contractual Obligations between Socialist Organizations]. Moscow, 1959. 192 p. (In Russ.).
Pavlov A. A. Prisuzhdenie k ispolneniyu obyazannosti kak sposob zashchity grazhdanskikh prav [Award to Performance of Obligations as a Way of Civil Rights Protection]. St. Petersburg, 2001. 219 p. (In Russ.).
Raykher V. K. Pravovye voprosy dogovornoy distsipliny v SSSR [Legal Issues of Contractual Discipline in the USSR]. Leningrad, 1958. 267 p. (In Russ.).
Rahmankulov H. Objazatel'stvennoe pravo (obshhie polozhenija) [Law of obligations (General Provisions)]. Tashkent, 2005. 305 p. (In Russ.).
Rakhmankulov Kh. R. Dogovornoe pravo [Contract Law]. Tashkent, 2015. 400 p. (In Russ.).
Rovny V. V. Printsipy ispolneniya obyazatel'stv: Voprosy dinamiki [Principles of Obligations Performance: Issues of Dynamics]. Sibirskiy juridicheskiy vestnik – Siberian Law Herald. 1999. Issue 1. Pp. 35–38. (In Russ.).
Sarbash S. V. Ispolnenie dogovornogo obyazatel'stva [Performance of Contractual Obligation]. Moscow, 2005. 636 p. (In Russ.).
Tolstoy V. S. Ispolnenie obyazatel'stv. [Performance of Obligations]. Moscow, 1973. 206 p. (In Russ.).

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.