Source: https://www.zapproved.com/blog/a-new-collection-of-ediscovery-case-law-summaries-focusing-on-proportionality-and-scope/
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 06:55:59+00:00

Document:
Ever since the amendments to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, litigants and courts have been struggling to draw the boundaries of appropriate discovery.
That’s why we’ve compiled these recent cases on proportionality and scope in one convenient ediscovery case law summary volume.
We’ve gathered together a range of cases from the last year, encompassing plaintiffs who would rather not produce the evidence they need for their claims and those who would rather engage in endless discovery instead of ever going to trial. We’ve even got a case where the court commended the litigants for cooperating to narrow the issues in dispute! Forensic examinations also came up several times, with courts ruling both for and against them, depending on the circumstances.
Rembrandt Diagnostics, LP v. Innovacon, Inc.
Firefighters’ Ret. Sys. v. Citco Grp. Ltd.
In re Simply Orange Orange Juice Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.
Nece v. Quicken Loans, Inc.
The Physicians Alliance Corp. v. WellCare Health Ins. of Ariz., Inc.
U.S. ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc.
Equal Emp’t Opportunity Comm’n v. FedEx Ground Package Sys., Inc.
N. Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Sys., Inc. v. MultiPlan, Inc.
Motorola Sols., Inc v. Hytera Comms. Corp.
Don’t miss out on this topical volume.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.