Source: http://www.childrenslegalrightsjournal.com/childrenslegalrightsjournal/volume_37_issue_1?pg=138
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 04:34:52+00:00

Document:
32 See Pikula v. Pikula, 274 N.W.2d 705, 711-12 (Minn. 1985).
33 See ELROD, supra note 12, at § 1: 9.
35 ABRAMS, supra note 9, at 686.
36 Many states, such as California, do not require an exactly equal 50/50 split to be considered joint custody. See CAL. FAM. CODE § 3004 (West, Westlaw through 2016 Legis. Sess.). The requirement may be that each parent has significant periods of physical custody of the child. Id.
37 See ELROD, supra note 12, at § 1: 7.
38 CAL. FAM. CODE § 3080 (West, Westlaw through 2016 Legis. Sess.).
39 See CAL. FAM. CODE § 3080 (West, Westlaw through 2016 Legis. Sess.); see CAL. FAM. CODE § 3020 (b) (West, Westlaw through 2016 Legis. Sess.); see CAL. FAM. CODE § 3040 (West, Westlaw through 2016 Legis. Sess.) .

References: v. 
 § 1
 § 3004
 § 1
 § 3080
 § 3080
 § 3020
 § 3040