Source: https://www.southflalaw.com/case-results.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 14:24:38+00:00

Document:
Throughout many years of service as a Florida and federal prosecutor as well as in private practice, Mr. Cohen has established a reputation as a tough litigator. As a criminal defense lawyer, he has represented his clients in many major court cases. Listed below are some of these noteworthy cases.
After Mr. Cohen submitted his appellate briefs and presented his oral argument, the Florida Supreme Court changed the law regarding foreign born individuals who seek to withdraw their guilty pleas after failing to be warned about the deportation consequences of those guilty pleas.
Florida Supreme Court Oral Arguments click here.
In United States v. Ali Hussein Khalaf Case No: 11-20075 CR Ungaro, the defendant was charged in a multi count Indictment with conspiring to aid and abet the manufacture and distribution of a controlled substance (cocaine); he was also charged with aiding and abetting the distribution of controlled substances and sale of drug paraphernalia including cut (the substance allegedly used to dilute the purity of controlled substances); After the filing of motions to dismiss by the defense, all the charges against Mr. Khalaf were dismissed by the government.
In United States v Joel Hernandez Sanchez Case No 12-CR-20173 Cr Lenard the defendant was charged with Aggravated Identity Theft in count I of this Indictment and two additional counts of Bringing in and Harboring an Alien. After a four day jury trial, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty on all counts of the Indictment.
In United States v. Daniel Cleary, Case No:11-CR-60019-WPD the defendant was charged with two counts of impersonating a Special Agent of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and thirty one additional counts of possession of law enforcement badges and identification cards as prohibited by law ; Mr Cleary was sentenced to probation on one of the counts of the Indictment only; All of the other 33 counts in the Indictment were dismissed.
In United States v. Damaris Elias, the defendant was charged in Count I of the Indictment with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marijuana and a second count of maintaining drug involved premises; After Mr. Cohen initially entered a not guilty plea on his clients behalf,all of the charges against this defendant were ultimately dismissed by the Government.
As an Assistant U.S. Attorney, Mr. Cohen, along with three other Assistant U.S. Attorneys, prosecuted this case. It was an example of the first major type of case of its kind prosecuted by the United States government dealing in money laundering against over more than one hundred indicted individuals.
This case determined the applicability of the judicial application used by Judicial Nominating Commissions in the State of Florida to the Americans with Disabilities Act.
The Copyright Act's prohibition against infringement of intangible property, does not extend to interstate transportation of stolen property.
Polygraph tests are not as such precluded in a criminal proceeding. Admissibility would be governed by the United States Supreme Court Daubert decision and Federal Rule of Evidence 702, which overruled the intrinsic inadmissibility outcome of the United States v. Frye.

References: v. 
 Case No: 11
 v. 
 Case No:11
 v. 
 v.