Source: http://www.oldsquare.co.uk/our-people/profile/paul-rose-qc
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 14:25:50+00:00

Document:
"A leader in his field who is very good at client care and a fantastic advocate with excellent judgement. He spots key issues rapidly and provides very sound and practical advice on difficult cases."
"Has a superb intellect and is able to see the important points in complex cases. He combines immense cerebral capacity with a down-to-earth bedside manner."
Paul Rose specialises in employment law and personal injury. He has acted in a number of leading cases in discrimination and in general employment law. In particular he has been involved in two recent lead cases on the issue of status as a 'worker' and status as an 'employee'. He has over 20 years’ experience in personal injury and again has been instructed in some of the leading cases in the field. He is a part time judge of employment tribunals and speaks regularly at seminars and conferences.
Paul Rose QC is ranked as a Leading Silk in Personal Injury Law in Chambers & Partners and Legal 500.
Chambers and Partners 2017 states he has an "incredible eye for detail, he's excellent" and "he's extremely thorough and he's got a very nice manner with clients" with Legal 500 2016 praising him as a "truly exceptional negotiator".
"He has brilliant advocacy skills and isn't fazed by complex issues" says Chambers and Partners 2016 and his "attention to detail is quite incredible; he misses nothing" says Legal 500 2015.
The "highly thorough" Paul Rose QC is recommended in employment, Chambers & Partners, 2014.
Paul Rose QC is recommended ‘without hesitation’ - Employment, Legal 500, 2013.
LG v. KS  traumatic brain injury. Lump sum settlement of £2.45 million; PP initially of £135,000 increasing to £156,000 per annum.
Paul Rose has over 20 years experience in personal injury litigation, stretching back to acting on behalf of the claimants in both the Opren and the Benzodiazepine litigation in the 1980's and 90's. Shortly thereafter he acted on behalf of the family and dependants of victims of the Chinook Mull of Kyntyre helicopter crash and the Kegworth M1 British Midland Air crash.
In 1994 he acted on behalf of the claimants in the Camelford water pollution claim.
McKinlay v. (1) Richard Lambe (2) AIG UK Ltd LTL 12/10/2009 RTA concerning motorcycles.
Paul Rose QC has specialised in Employment law since 1987. He has appeared in approximately 25 reported cases covering all aspects of discrimination law, TUPE and general employment disputes. He has sat as a fee paid employment judge for 10 years and speaks regularly at conferences and seminars.
Franks v. Reuters  IRLR 423 a decision of the Court of Appeal on the meaning of 'employee'.
Balgobin v. London Borough of Tower Hamlets  ICR 829 decision on statutory defence.
Johnson Controls v. (1) Campbell (2) UKAEA  All ER (D) 220 EAT decision in service provision change.
Law Society of England & Wales v. Secretary of State for Justice  IRLR 407 decision of Queen’s Bench Division on whether a transfer of an undertaking.
Kerry Foods v. Creber  IRLR 10 a wide-ranging decision on TUPE by Morison P.
Whent v. Cartledge Ltd  IRLR 153 a decision of the EAT concerning the impact of TUPE on collective agreements.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.