Source: https://www.ucmjdefense.com/resources/sentencing-argument/sentencing-and-sentencing-credit/introduction/personnel-records-reflecting-character-of-prior-service-rcm-1001b2.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 14:59:21+00:00

Document:
1. “Under regulations of the Secretary concerned, trial counsel may obtain and introduce from the personnel records of the accused evidence of . . . character of prior service” (emphasis added). These records may include personnel records contained in the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) or located elsewhere, unless prohibited by law or other regulation. Army Regulation (AR) 27-10, para. 5-29a implements RCM 1001(b)(2).
2. AR 27-10, para. 5-29a illustrates, in a non-exclusive manner, those items qualifying for admissibility under RCM 1001(b)(2) and (d).
3. Personnel records are NOT limited to matters contained in a service member’s Military Personnel Records Jacket (MPRJ), OMPF or Career Management Information File (CMIF). AR 27-10, para. 5-29a. The rule of United States v. Weatherspoon, 39 M.J. 762 (A.C.M.R. 1994) (holding that personnel records are only those records in the OMPF, MPRJ, and CMIF) is no longer good law. The key is whether the record is maintained IAW applicable departmental regulations.
whether the DD 508s themselves were admissible. Id. at 248 n.2.
admission criteria under RCM 1001(b)(3) [prior conviction].
absentia) was admissible pursuant to RCM 1001(b)(2).
just acquitted appellant. The sentence was set aside and a rehearing authorized.
MJ’s determination of admissibility of NJP records).
to a prior NJP. That failure to object waived any objection.
d) United States v. Rimmer, 39 M.J. 1083 (A.C.M.R. 1994) (per curiam).
whether he conducted an open or closed hearing.
e) United States v. Godden, 44 M.J. 716 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 1996).
Article 15 is going to stay out, it stays out.
g) United States v. LePage, 59 M.J. 659 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App. 2003).
consideration of the prior NJP.
it may have been plain, the accused’s rights were not materially prejudiced.
also brandishing him a sexual deviant or molester of teenage girls.” Id. at 283.
maintenance of the letters, and the evidence directly rebutted defense evidence.
introduced in aggravation. See analysis to RCM 1001(b)(2).
information on prior convictions was admissible under RCM 1001(b)(2)).
7. Defects in documentary evidence.
v. Stone, 37 M.J. 558 (A.C.M.R. 1993); and United States v. Zakaria, 38 M.J.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 

v. 
 v.