Source: https://www.ucmjdefense.com/resources/evidence/hearsay/common-hearsay-exceptions.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 15:04:37+00:00

Document:
Present Sense Impressions and Excited Utterances.
declarant was perceiving the event or condition or immediately thereafter.
was under the stress of excitement caused by the event or condition.
soon after the event; and the statement “describes or explains” an event.
32 M.J. 843 (N.M.C.M.R. 1991), aff’d, 36 M.J. 124 (C.M.A. 1992).
made the statement while he or she was in a state of nervous excitement.
hearsay. MJ admits as excited utterance but rejects as residual hearsay.
theories for admissibility of evidence.
lapse of time was not dispositive.
she had to be alone with and speak to a trusted adult.
Statements for purposes of medical diagnosis or treatment.
benefits but instead for the purpose of facilitating collection of evidence.
case, the fact the trial counsel initiated the examination of JK by Dr.
not an abuse of discretion.
evidence, but may not itself by received as an exhibit unless offered by an adverse party.
Records of Regularly Conducted Activities (Business Records).
diaries, individual equipment records, daily strength records of prisoners, and rosters of prisoners.
(C.M.A. 1991) and United States v. Tebsherany, 32 M.J. 351 (C.M.A.
NCIC Reports. United States v. Littles: 35 M.J. 644 (N.M.C.M.R.
was not a record or report of the activities of NCIC).
records. Lab reports and chain of custody documents are admissible.
United States v. Vietor, 10 M.J. 69 (C.M.A. 1980); United States v.
testimonial since law enforcement requested the report).
Computer Phone Records. United States v. Casey, 45 M.J. 623 (N.M. Ct.
even the best available, to produce records of adequate reliability.
VHS Videotapes. Rule 803(6) Business records. U.S. v. Harris, 55 M.J.
“generally familiar” with the process.
Public Records and Reports. Rule 803(8).
unless the sources of information or other circumstances indicate lack of trustworthiness.
strength records of prisoners, and rosters of prisoners.
admissibility. United States v. Anderson, 12 M.J. 527 (N.M.C.M.R.
must satisfy a hearsay exception to satisfy Rule 805.
chronicle the relevant dates, times, and locations of the accused.
authority by the testimony or admission of the witness or by other expert testimony or by judicial notice.
If admitted, the statements may be read into evidence but may not be received as exhibits.
the most commonly used treatises is reliable is not great.” Michael H.
evidence; the learned treatise itself does not become an exhibit.
Residual Hearsay Rule – The “Catchall”. Rule 803(24) and 804(b)(5).
statement and the particulars of it, including the name and address of the declarant.
consistent with earlier excited utterances.
the point for which it is offered. United States v. Pablo, 50 M.J.
Provide notice of intended use.
proponent intended to use to seek admission of the statements.
to offer the statements. Notice was satisfied.
exhibit that was entered into evidence without defense objection.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.