Source: http://www.childrenslegalrightsjournal.com/childrenslegalrightsjournal/volume_34_issue_2?pg=22
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 22:12:37+00:00

Document:
Under their purview, correctional agencies have a legitimate interest and an affirmative duty in maintaining safety and order within facilities. Reliance on the use of isolation practices, however, may actually make facilities more dangerous and less orderly than facilities with effective behavioral management systems. This is discussed further in the section on Performance-based Standards below.
159 Morgan v. Sproat, 432 F. Supp. 1130, 1138-40 (S.D. Miss. 1977).
160 Pena v. N. Y. State Div. for Youth, 419 F. Supp. 203, 210 (S.D.N. Y. 1976).
161 Santana v. Collazo, 714 F.2d 1172, 1182 (1st Cir. 1983).
162 Youngberg v. Romeo, 457 U.S. 307, 324 (1982).
163 Alexander S. v. Boyd, 876 F. Supp. 773, 797 (D.S.C. 1995).
164 Youngberg, 457 U.S. at 321; see also Overton v. Bazzetta, 539 U.S. 126, 132 (2003) (according substantial deference “to the professional judgment of prison administrators, who bear a significant responsibility for defining the legitimate goals of a corrections system and for determining the most appropriate means to accomplish them”).
165 Alexander S., 876 F. Supp. at 787.
166 Youngberg, 457 U.S. at 321.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.