Source: https://www.retailpatentlitigation.com/2017/12/july-2017-retail-patent-litigation-report/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 20:23:25+00:00

Document:
July filings were up slightly as patent holders figured out where to file and cleared out a backlog of cases. As in June, post-TC Heartland filings, East Texas filings stayed way down and the bulk of the non-Texas filings went to Delaware, as well as to a lesser degree California and Illinois district courts, in particular. Frequent filers included Blackbird Technologies, JSDQ Mesh Technologies, Kaldren, Mirror Imaging, Realtime Data, and VOIT Technologies.
Blackbird Tech LLC d/b/a Blackbird Technologies v. Scalematrix et al. (S.D. Cal.; D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 8,424,885 (Method and apparatus for an environmentally-protected electronic equipment enclosure); 9,400,190 (Real-time traffic condition measurement using network transmission data); 7,958,214 (Method for secure transactions utilizing physically separated computers); 8,285,832 (Method for secure transactions utilizing physically separated computers); and 9,424,848 (Method for secure transactions utilizing physically separated computers).
RAH Color Technologies LLC v. Quad/Graphics, Inc. (N.D. Ill.; D. Colo.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 6,995,870 (System for distributing and controlling color reproduction at multiple sites); 7,312,897 (System for distributing and controlling color reproduction at multiple sites); 7,729,008 (System for distributing and controlling color reproduction at multiple sites); 7,830,546 (System for distributing and controlling color reproduction at multiple sites); 8,537,357 (System for distributing and controlling color reproduction at multiple sites); 8,760,704 (System for distributing and controlling color reproduction at multiple sites); 8,279,236 (Methods and apparatus for calibrating a color display); 8,638,340 (Color calibration of color image rendering devices); 9,404,802 (System for distributing and controlling color reproduction at multiple sites); and 9,516,288 (Color calibration of color image rendering devices).
VOIT Technologies, LLC v. It’s Only Natural, LLC (D. Colo.; S.D. Fla.; M.D. Fla.; W.D.N.C.) (multiple cases).
Budget Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc.
Kaldren LLC v. AbbVie Inc. (N.D., Ill.; E.D. Wis.) (multiple cases).
IDB Ventures, LLC v. DSW Inc. (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Spider Search Analytics LLC v. MicroPyramid Inc. (E.D. Tex.; D. Mass.) (multiple cases).
Fall Line Patents, LLC v. Choice Hotels (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
e-Numerate Solutions, Inc. et al v. Mattress Firm Holding Corp. (D. Del.).
Defendant: Mattress Firm Holding Corp.
Patents: 7,650,355 (Reusable macro markup language); 8,185,816 (Combining reusable data markup language documents); 9,262,383 (System, method, and computer program product for processing a markup document); and 9,268,748 (System, method, and computer program product for outputting markup language documents).
Smart Authentication IP, LLC v. Personal Capital Corporation (D. Del.).
Mirror Imaging LLC v. Austin Bancorp, Inc. (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Hybrid Audio, LLC v. Adobe systems Incorporated (E.D. Del.) (multiple cases).
TMI Solutions LLC v. Bath & Body Works Direct, Inc. (D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 9,484,077 (Providing services from a remote computer system to a user station over a communications network); and 9,484,078 (Providing services from a remote computer system to a user station over a communications network).
Realtime Data LLC d/b/a IXO v. Acronis, Inc. (D. Mass.; D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 7,415,530 (System and methods for accelerated data storage and retrieval); 8,717,204 (Methods for encoding and decoding data); 9,054,728 (Data compression systems and methods); and 9,116,908 (System and methods for accelerated data storage and retrieval).
GTX Corp. v. Openbucks Corp. (N.D. Cal.).
Patent: 6,876,979 (Electronic commerce bridge system).
Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc. v. NewZoom, LLC f/k/a NewZoom, Inc. d/b/a ZoomSystems et al. (D. Del.; N.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Plaintiff: Crane Merchandising Systems, Inc.
Patents: 6,328,180 (Apparatus and method for vending products); and 8,484,068 (Method and system for evaluating consumer demand for multiple products and services at remotely located equipment).
EveryMD.com LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. (C.D. Cal.).
Patent: 9,584,461 (Method and apparatus for transmitting electronic mail).
CustomPlay, LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc. (S.D. Fla.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 8,494,346 (Identifying a performer during a playing of a video); 9,124,950 (Providing item information notification during video playing); 9,380,282 (Providing item information during video playing); and 6,408,128 (Replaying with supplementary information a segment of a video).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.