Source: https://www.ra-juedemann.de/anwalt-urheberrecht-berlin-central-district-court-ca-vom-22-4-2014-tarantino-v-gawker-link-screenplay-copy-infringing-use-screenplay/
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 19:06:28+00:00

Document:
Title: Quentin Tarantino -v-Gawker Media, LLC., et al.
notice of Exhibits A and B of Defendant’s Request for Judicial Notice of Exhibits A-D [Docket No.
copyright in the original unpublished, unreleased motion picture screenplay to The Hateful Eight.
Office on January 23, 2014. Id., ¶ 15.
plaintiff or concern facts at issue in the complaint. See Wible v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 375 F. Supp.
Defendant did “encourage Gawker visitors to read the Screenplay.” Id., ¶ 2.
was posted online in its reporting on the leak of the screenplay.
right to relief above the speculative level.” Id.
Wyler Summit Partnership v. Turner Broadcasting System, Inc., 135 F.3d 658, 661 (9th Cir. 1998).
922 F. Supp. at 304 (citing Western Mining Council v. Watt, 643 F.2d 618, 624 (9th Cir. 1981) cert.
denied, 454 U.S. 1031 (1981)).
judgment. See, e.g., id.; Branch v. Tunnel, 14 F.3d 449, 454 (9th Cir. 1994).
in personal conduct that encourages or assists the infringement. Id.
action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice”)); Med-Systems, Inc. v.
failed to adequately allege a claim of contributory infringement against Defendant.
B. Defendant’s “Fair Use” Argument Is Premature.
forth unambiguously in the complaint“).
opportunity to demonstrate that he can state a viable claim for contributory copyright infringement.
set forth in Iqbal”); U.S. v. Center for Diagnostic Imagining, Inc., 787 F.Supp. 2d 1213, 1221 (W.D.
infringement against Defendant. Plaintiff shall file his First Amended Complaint by May 1, 2014.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.