Source: https://www.questia.com/read/120365269/the-warren-court-and-american-politics
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 13:00:48+00:00

Document:
1. Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr., The Politics of Upheaval, 488 (1960).
2. 6 Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin D. Roosevelt, 122, 130, 126 (1937).
3. Time, April 5, 1937, at 13.
4. Frank Freidel, Franklin D. Roosevelt, 229 (1990).
5. Bruce Ackerman, We the People: Transformations, 334 (1998).
6. William E. Leuchtenburg, The Supreme Court Reborn, 142 (1995); for a revisionist position, see Barry Cashman, Rethinking the New Deal Court (1998).
7. The text of Footnote Four reads as follows: There may be narrower scope for operation of the presumption of constitutionality when legislation appears on its face to be within a specific prohibition of the Constitution, such as those of the first ten amendments, which are deemed equally specific when held to be embraced within the Fourteenth. See Stromberg v. California, 283 U.S. 359, 369–370; Lovell v. Griffin, 303 U.S. 444, 452.
It is unnecessary to consider now whether legislation which restricts those political processes which can ordinarily be expected to bring about repeal of undesirable legislation, is to be subjected to more exacting judicial scrutiny under the general prohibitions of the Fourteenth Amendment than are most other types of legislation. On restrictions upon the right to vote, see Nixon v. Herndon, 273 U.S. 536; Nixon v. Condon, 286 U.S. 73; on restraints upon the dissemination of information, see Near v. Minnesota ex rel. Olson, 283 U.S. 697, 713–714, 718–720, 722; Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U.S. 233; Lovell v. Griffin, supra; on interferences with political organizations, see Stromberg v. California, supra, 369; Fiske v. Kansas, 274 U.S. 380; Whitney v. California, 274 U.S. 357, 373–378; Herndon v. Lowry, 301 U.S. 242; and see Holmes, J., in Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652, 673; as to prohibition of peaceable assembly, see De Jonge v. Oregon, 299 U.S. 353, 365.
Nor need we enquire whether similar considerations enter into the review of statutes directed at particular religions, Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, or national, Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390; Bartels v. Iowa, 262 U.S. 404; Farrington v. Tokushige, 273 U.S. 484, or racial minorities, Nixon v.
Publication information: Book title: The Warren Court and American Politics. Contributors: Lucas A. Powe Jr. - Author. Publisher: Belknap Press. Place of publication: Cambridge, MA. Publication year: 2000. Page number: 511.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.