Source: https://www.thepagg.com/washington.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 06:50:38+00:00

Document:
and win against city hall.
duties, citing Smith v. Leber, 34 Wn.2d 611, 623 (1949) and Dickinson v.
Edwards, 105 Wn.2d 457 (1986).
that substantial compliance therewith will be deemed satisfactory.
liability under 28 USC, section1356 (b), 6ALR FED 373?
strict liability, or discretionary acts by government agents.
Judicial Court of Massachusetts recognized that "Article 5 . . .
Two cases to look at: Hafer v. Melo, 112 S.Ct. 358(1991). U.S.
bench," as some other private entity, in doing so.
FALSE ARREST: MENTAL DISTRESS: SETTLEMENT.
INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS: SETTLEMENT.
Lucas v. Township of Jefferson, U.S. District Court, D.N.J., No.
DETAINEE: WRONGFUL DEATH: STRUCTURED SETTLEMENT.
Carter v. City of Flint, U.S. District Court, E.D.
Mich., No. 81-40016, Apr. 30, 1984.
COMPENSATORY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES: ATTORNEY FEES.
Franklin v. City of Detroit, Wayne County 36th District Court, No.
awarded for attorney fees under 42 U.S.C., sec.1988.
MALICIOUS PROSECUTION -- COMPENSATORY AND PUNITIVE DAMAGES.
Judicial Circuit Court, No. 83-384 CA (L) 01 1, Mar. 21, 1984.
"not every action by a judge is in exercise of his judicial function. ... it is not a judicial function for a judge to commit an intentional tort even though the tort occurs in the courthouse." Cf. Vickrey v. Dunivan, 1955, 59 N.M. 90, 279 P.2d 853.

References: v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.