Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/321207027/United-States-v-Raphel-Smith-4th-Cir-2012
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 16:39:13+00:00

Document:
Fifteen), in violation of 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A) (2006).
consecutive sentence of 60 months on Count Fifteen.
ruling, and the reasonableness of his sentence.
part, vacate in part, and remand for resentencing.
as to all four counts.
denial of a Rule 29 motion.
F.3d 566, 571 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 564 (2011).
Penniegraft, 641 F.3d at 572.
interacted with the conspiracy firsthand.
at 763 (elements of conspiracy).
banc) (describing aiding and abetting in conspiracy context).
and the guns benefits to the February 21 drug sale.
guilt); United States v. Lomax, 293 F.3d 701, 705 (4th Cir.
2002) (discussing in furtherance of requirement).
that the court erred by admitting evidence of a prior robbery.
See United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732 (1993).
995-97 (4th Cir. 1997) (providing standard).
arguments, and inadequate explanation of the sentence imposed.
review the substantive reasonableness of the sentence.
United States v. Slade, 631 F.3d 185, 188 (4th Cir.), cert.
F.3d 326, 336-37 (4th Cir. 2008) (defining clear error).
United States v. Milam, 443 F.3d 382, 386 (4th Cir.
incorrect . . . .
court clearly erred in this regard.
See id.; United States v.
Ricco, 52 F.3d 58, 63 (4th Cir. 1995) (approving 100:88 powderto-crack conversion ratio).
they have no impact on his Guidelines range.
factual finding supporting the role enhancement for clear error.
United States v. Kellam, 568 F.3d 125, 147-48 (4th Cir. 2009).
removed from the commentary to the Guidelines.
a variance from the Guidelines range.
would support the role enhancement.
See Harvey, 532 F.3d at 336-37.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.