Source: https://www.ada.gov/olmstead/olmstead_enforcement.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 05:11:13+00:00

Document:
The Department is working with State and local government officials, disability rights groups and attorneys around the country, and with representatives of the Department of Health and Human Services to fashion an effective, nationwide program to enforce the integration mandate of the Department's regulation implementing title II of the ADA.
Carey et. al. v. Christie-1:12-cv-02522-RMB-AMD-(D.N.J. 2012).
West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources | (PDF) – On June 1, 2015, the United States sent its findings to the state stating it violates the Americans with Disabilities Act and Olmstead v. L.C. by failing to deliver mental health services to children who rely on publicly funded care in the most integrated settings appropriate. Children in West Virginia experience high levels of institutionalization per capita and are unable to access mental health services in their homes and communities.
U.S. v. Virginia –3:12cv059 – (E.D. Va. 2012) - On January 26, 2012, the Division filed in District Court a Complaint and a simultaneous Settlement Agreement resolving its ADA Olmstead investigation into whether persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities in Virginia are being served in the most integrated settings appropriate to their needs.
On December 21, 2016, the United States sent its findings to the state notifying it of violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which stem from its failure to deliver services to people with serious mental illness in the most integrated settings appropriate. People with serious mental illness in Louisiana often must enter nursing facilities to receive the day-to-day assistance they need when they rely on the state to provide those services.
Troupe v. Barbour – 10-CV-00153 – (S.D. Miss. 2010) - The United States filed a Statement of Interest opposing Mississippi officials' motion to dismiss the complaint of Medicaid-eligible children with significant behavioral disorders who allege that the State of Mississippi fails to ensure that medically necessary services are provided to Medicaid-eligible children in the most integrated setting appropriate to their needs in violation of the ADA and the EPSDT provisions of the Medicaid Act.
Maertz v. Minott - 1:13-cv-957-JMS-MJD (S.D. In. 2015) | (PDF) - On March 27, 2015, the United States filed a Statement of Interest in opposition to the State of Indiana’s argument that serious risk of institutionalization or segregation is not a viable claim under the ADA. In Maertz, Plaintiffs with developmental disabilities provided evidence that the State of Indiana harmed their health by drastically reducing their home and community-based Medicaid services, placing them at serious risk of institutionalization.
On May 2, 2016, the United States sent its findings to the state notifying it of violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act and Olmstead v. L.C. due to its failure to deliver services to people with disabilities in the most integrated settings appropriate. People with disabilities in South Dakota, including those with chronic illnesses, physical disabilities, disabilities resulting from the aging process, and cognitive disabilities, often must enter nursing facilities to receive the day-to-day assistance they need when they rely on the state to provide those services.
On October 14, 2014 the United States filed a Statement of Interest in Alabama Disabilities Advocacy Program v. SafetyNet Youthcare, Inc., a case in which the defendant denied access to the local protection and advocacy organization. The Statement of Interest expresses the United States' view that facilities must permit access under the Protection and Advocacy for Individuals with Mental Illness Act to all residents regardless of whether the facility characterizes some residents as having a less serious mental health disorder than others.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.