Source: http://plaw.nlu.edu.ua/article/view/70648
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 20:09:26+00:00

Document:
The article analyzes the dynamic development of legislation in the field of economic relations is matched to structural transformation in the law, and therefore the law, and legislation is organically linked. Аs a consequence, become structurally tumors in the legal system as a key emerging trend of improving its evolyutsinuvannya. In this sense, the normative legal provision of economic relations – is a complete standalone system, it is appropriate to determine as the only legal complex object. It is established that it is considering systematic in identifying major and minor aspects of the legal functioning of the economic system we can talk about high efficiency of legal regulation of the global economic system. Proved that despite the complex hierarchical nature of relations in the economic system that tends to continuing specialization of its components, ensuring the interaction of all elements of the structure and output of its operation to set general parameters requires an integrative, holistic, coherent with the legal system and legal support in adequate to the problem of this magnitude format.
Now the scientific legal literature began to explore some categorical concepts, some substantive mechanisms for the enhancement of the conceptual level that can be regarded as approval beliefs and understanding of the separation of such jurisprudence as Economic Law of Ukraine [1–11]. The rich have paid attention to this issue and scientists of Kharkiv Donetsk schools of law, namely:, D. V. Zadyhaylo, D. D. Zadyhaylo, V. S. Milash, V. A. Ustymenko and others. Also, this perspective was a range of scientific interests of Kiev and Odessa schools, namely A. M. Vinnik, O. P. Podtserkovnyy, V. S. Shcherbina and others. In the former Soviet Union it examined: A. Alpatov, G. Velyanovskyy, G. Balsevich, M. Odintsov, V. Tambovtsev and others. However, scientists have not paid sufficient attention, and the very conceptual analysis of the category of «economic rights» as a separate legal phenomenon, that conceptual device was left outside the research, also identified and place of the term «economic law» in the legal space as required result Sociodynamics the mechanism legislation. However, usually focuses on individual fragments relationship functioning economic system creating categorical apparatus required for each. It should be added that often because of certain circumstances their views do not correspond to modern realities, because the dynamics of economic relations for ten years - big time. In view of the above it can be stated that the question of integrative processes of legislation on economic issues, the impact of international standards on the process of modernization of national economic legislation and determine their role in it as a whole are not defined.
Consideration of this issue is caused by lack of conceptual apparatus legislation Ukraine of terms such as «economic system» and «economic law». In addition, the domestic legislation is not developed a mechanism to ensure the development of the latter, which operates successfully operates a modern legal systems of the world. Given this, we can state that the need to adapt Ukrainian legal doctrine to the European legal system is in the legal functioning of the economic system of our country, because the design of economic law as a science and discipline will solve the problem of mismatch economic and legal point of view, a holistic concept relations state of law and Economics. Emphasize that while this gap is not eliminated, that remain unsettled some legal aspects of the existing conceptual mechanism of legal support economic system is inadequate. In addition, should agree on the basic provisions of legislation on regulation of relevant relations with foreign countries, to achieve the level of economic indicators sought legal opinion and national general our country.
The article is the rationale for the legislative and legal consolidation of the concept of «economic law» as a structural system neoplasms legislation and establishing a comprehensive nature of the institution as a whole legal complex object in the legal system and functional state’s influence on him.
Axiomatic is provision for a close dialectical relationship between economic and legal systems. Even in the XVIII century, Adam Smith (author of «The Wealth of Nations» and the phrase «life, liberty and property») pondered the economic consequences of the establishment «of mercantile laws». Along with Smith and other philosophers saw the relationship between economics and law. On this occasion expressed their thoughts and «father of communism» – Karl Marx.
However, in today’s issue of legal compliance to ensure economic relations existing forms of their implementation is complex and multifaceted and has a corresponding character. First of all, this is due to globalization of economic processes, the growing role and importance of public international economic law and private international law in the establishment and regulation of foreign economic relations, which play a large share in the global and national GDP. Thus, the emerging global economic right, which may be partly represented the concept LEX mercantoria. However, in internal legislation of the update is kompleknyh a number of industries that are designed to overcome industry barriers to legal provision of economic relations.
Thus it is necessary a certain legal unification of the whole arsenal of different-legal instruments. Yes, this formulation of questions, answers attempt to form such a category as an economic right - the integrative result of independent development of its industry components.
1. The economic system is a complex set of social relations of production that ensure economic activities on certain principles of coordination between the participants and subjects of economy in the dominant way to distribute the results of its operations, determining the degree of efficiency of the national economy. Thus, the economic system as a whole set of economic relations should be represented as a single object of legal regulation, because it is a sign of «whole nature» of the latter, which is inherent in any system, its operation logically implies the interaction of all elements by « self-regulation «of all systemically important ties between these elements and therefore obligatory to talk about the development of a single legal model for organizing economic relations in general.
2. In modern terms of structuring the legal system and legislation are distributed between the individual sectors. Some of them are homogeneous by private law or public-legal nature, such as the civil law or the finance law, the while law others are complex the hospodarske law, the agricultural law, the environmental (natural resource) law. However, the structure of the said areas of the economic law as a separate category is not saying.
3. The need for the formation of just such regulatory structural macro grounded weight increasing economic sphere as integral object of social management-for: 1) implementation of a unified economic policy; 2) the macroeconomic state regulation; 3) external influences on the national economy due to the implementation of the economic policy of other states, international economic organizations, the impact kon’yuktury foreign markets; 4) the need to implement (incentives) universal properties of the national economy as such. For example – providing innovative character of economic development, the introduction of alternative energy as the dominant source of energy, the implementation of restructuring the national economy, overcoming depression and economic degradation regions and so on.
4. The possibility and feasibility of forming such superkompleksu the right to an economic right may also grounded bute legal and technical aspects of constitutional and legal support: 1) although fragmented, but overall the nature of the constitutional and legal regulation of economic relations; 2) fixation general legal economic values - objects of constitutional and legal regulation (economic security, constitutional economic order, economic diversity, etc.); 3) if the text of the Basic Law and the common values of the components overall, defining of competence load state authorities, in particular: a) the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine on objects of legal regulation referred to in Article 92 of the Constitution of Ukraine, namely the use of natural resources, the exclusive ( maritime) economic zone and the continental shelf, the space exploration organization and operation of energy, transportation and communications, the legal regime of property rights, legal principles and guarantees of entrepreneurship, rules of competition and antitrust rules, principles of foreign relations, foreign trade, customs, etc. ; b) The Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine - the functions of the Government to ensure the functioning of the economic system listed in Article 116 of the Constitution of Ukraine, for example, develops and implements national programs of economic, scientific, technical, social and cultural development of Ukraine, ensures equal conditions of development of all forms of ownership; carries out management of state property in accordance with law; c) general economic content and nature of the competence of certain public authorities such as the NBU, AMC and others.
Haustova, M.G. (2013). Tendencii' rozvytku prava v umovah globalizacii'. Problemy zakonnosti, issue 124, 3–15 [in Ukrainian].
Nersesjanc, V.S. (2005). Processy universalizacii prava i gosudarstva v globalizirujushhemsja mire. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 5, 36–53 [in Russian].
Zadyhajlo, D.V. (2010). Kodyfikacija innovacijnogo zakonodavstva: okremi konceptual'no-pravovi pidhody. Visnyk Akademii' pravovyh nauk Ukrai'ny, 4 (63), 177–185 [in Ukrainian].
Tytova, N. I. (1995). Agrarne zakonodavstvo Ukrai'ny. Pravo Ukrai'ny, 1, 6–9 [in Ukrainian].
Janchuk, V. Z., Andrejcev, V.I., Vasyljuk, S.F. et al. (2000). Agrarne pravo Ukrai'ny. V. Z. Janchuk (Ed.). 2-e vyd., pererob. ta dop. Kiev: Yurinkom Inter [in Ukrainian].
Semchyk, V.I., Stretovych V.M., Pogribnyj, O.O. et al. (1998). Agrarne zakonodavstvo Ukrai'ny: problemy efektyvnosti. V. I. Semchyka (Ed). – Kiev: Nauk. dumka [in Ukrainian].
Zadyhajlo, D.V. (2012). Ekonomichna systema jak organichnyj ob’jekt zakonodavchogo zabezpechennja. Visnyk Akademii' pravovyh nauk Ukrai'ny, 4 (71), 210–221 [in Ukrainian].
Olefir, A.O. (2012). Do pytannja vdoskonalennja derzhavnogo reguljuvannja gospodars'kyh vidnosyn v ohoroni zdorov’ja. Teorija i praktyka pravoznavstva. issue 1 (2). tlow.nlu.edu.ua. Retrived from: http://tlow.nlu.edu.ua/ [in Ukrainian].
Zadyhajlo, D.V. (2012). Gospodars'ko-pravove zabezpechennja ekonomichnoi' polityky derzhavy. Kharkiv: Jurajt, 430–454 [in Ukrainian].
Zadyhajlo, D.V. (2013). Procesy koncentracii' kapitalu v ekonomici Ukrai'ny (gospodars'ko-pravovi pozycii'). In: Zasoby ta mehanizmy gospodars'ko-pravovogo reguljuvannja. Kharkiv: Jurajt, vol. 3, 8–45 [in Ukrainian].
Zadyhajlo, D.V. (2013). Ekonomichna polityka derzhavy v systemi pravovogo i zakonodavchogo zabezpechennja. D.V. Zadyhajlo (Ed.). Visnyk Akademii' pravovyh nauk Ukrai'ny, 3 (74), 214–221 [in Ukrainian].
Zadyhajlo, D.D. (2010). Regional'na polityka derzhavy: formuvannja pravovogo mehanizmu realizacii'. Visnyk Nacional'noi' jurydychnoi' akademii' Ukrai'ny imeni Jaroslava Mudrogo. Serija: Ekonomichna teorija ta pravo, 1, 166–174 [in Ukrainian].
Zadyhajlo, D.D. (2014). Teoretychni aspekt y konstytucijno-pravovogo zabezpechennja dijal'nosti derzhavy v ekonomichnij sferi. Visnyk Nacional'nogo universytetu «Jurydychna akademija Ukrai'ny imeni Jaroslava Mudrogo». Serija: Ekonomichna teorija ta pravo, 1 (16), 170–179 [in Ukrainian].
Zadyhajlo, D.D. (2014). Pravove reguljuvannja ekonomichnyh vidnosyn: reformuvannja zakonodavchogo zabezpecennja. Visnyk Nacional'nogo universytetu «Jurydychna akademija Ukrai'ny imeni Jaroslava Mudrogo». Serija: Ekonomichna teorija ta pravo, 2 (17), 179–188 [in Ukrainian].
Zadyhajlo, D.D. (2013). Kabinet Ministriv Ukrai'ny jak sub’jekt ekonomichnoi' systemy: konstytucijno-pravovi zasady. Kharkiv: Jurajt [in Ukrainian].
Zadyhajlo, D.V. (2014). Okremi zavdannja optymizacii' pravovogo zabezpechennja gospodars'kyh vidnosyn. Visnyk Nacional'noi' akademii' pravovyh nauk Ukrai'ny, 1 (76), 121–130 [in Ukrainian].
Skakun, O.F. (2013). Etapy stanovlennja «ekonomiky prava» jak naukovoi' ta navchal'noi' dyscypliny v krai'nah svitu i suchasne formuvannja «ekonomichnogo prava» v Ukrai'ni ta Rosii'. Visnyk Nacional'nogo universytetu «Jurydychna akademija Ukrai'ny imeni Jaroslava Mudrogo». Serija: Ekonomichna teorija ta pravo, 1 (12), 120–128 [in Ukrainian].
1. Хаустова М. Г. Тенденції розвитку права в умовах глобалізації / М. Г. Хаустова // Проблеми законності. – 2013. – Вип. 124. – С. 3–15.
2. Нерсесянц В. С. Процессы универсализации права и государства в глобализирующемся мире / В. С. Нерсесянц // Гос-во и право. – 2005. – № 5. – С. 36–53.
3. Задихайло Д. В. Кодифікація інноваційного законодавства: окремі концептуально-правові підходи / Д. В. Задихайло // Вісник Академії правових наук України : зб. наук. праць. – 2010. – № 4 (63). – С. 177–185.
4. Титова Н. І. Аграрне законодавство України / Н. І. Титова // Право України. – 1995. – № 1. – С. 6–9.
5. Аграрне право України : підручник / В. З. Янчук, В. І. Андрейцев, С. Ф. Василюк [та ін.] ; за ред. В. З. Янчука. – 2-е вид., перероб. та допов. – Київ : Юрінком Інтер, 2000. – 720 с.
В. М. Стретович, О. О. Погрібний [та ін.] ; за ред. В. І. Семчика. – Київ : Наук. думка, 1998. – 243 с.
7. Задихайло Д. В. Економічна система як органічний об’єкт законодавчого забезпечення / Д. В. Задихайло // Вісник Академії правових наук України : зб. наук.
праць. – 2012. – № 4 (71). – С. 210–221.
8. Олефір А. О. До питання вдосконалення державного регулювання господарських відносин в охороні здоров’я [Електронний ресурс] / А. О. Олефір // Теорія і практика правознавства : електрон. наук. зб. – 2012. – Вип. 1 (2). – Режим доступу : http://tlow.nlu.edu.ua/.
9. Задихайло Д. В. Господарсько-правове забезпечення економічної політики держави : монографія / Д. В. Задихайло. – Харків : Юрайт, 2012. – С. 430–454.
10. Задихайло Д. В. Процеси концентрації капіталу в економіці України (господарсько-правові позиції) / Д. В. Задихайло // Засоби та механізми господарсько-правового регулювання : монографія. – Харків : Юрайт, 2013. – Т. 3. – С. 8–45.
11. Задихайло Д. В. Економічна політика держави в системі правового і законодавчого забезпечення / Д. В. Задихайло // Вісник Академії правових наук України : зб. наук. праць. – 2013. – № 3 (74). – С. 214–221.
12. Задихайло Д. Д. Регіональна політика держави: формування правового механізму реалізації / Д. Д. Задихайло // Вісник Національної юридичної академії України імені Ярослава Мудрого. Серія: Економічна теорія та право. – 2010. – № 1. – С. 166–174.
13. Задихайло Д. Д. Теоретичні аспекти конституційно-правового забезпечення діяльності держави в економічній сфері / Д. Д. Задихайло // Вісник Національного університету «Юридична академія України імені Ярослава Мудрого». Серія: Економічна теорія та право. – 2014. – № 1 (16). – С. 170–179.
14. Задихайло Д. Д. Правове регулювання економічних відносин: реформування законодавчого забезпечення / Д. Д. Задихайло // Вісник Національного університету «Юридична академія України імені Ярослава Мудрого». Серія: Економічна теорія та право. – 2014. – № 2 (17). – С. 179–188.
15. Задихайло Д. Д. Кабінет Міністрів України як суб’єкт економічної системи: конституційно-правові засади : монографія / Д. Д. Задихайло ; НАПрН України, НДІ держ. буд. та місц. самовряд. – Харків : Юрайт, 2013. – 192 с.
16. Задихайло Д. В. Окремі завдання оптимізації правового забезпечення господарських відносин / Д. В. Задихайло // Вісник Національної академії правових наук України : зб. наук. праць. – 2014. – № 1 (76). – С. 121–130.
17. Скакун О. Ф. Етапи становлення «економіки права» як наукової та навчальної дисципліни в країнах світу і сучасне формування «економічного права» в Україні та Росії / О. Ф. Скакун // Вісник Національного університету «Юридична академія України імені Ярослава Мудрого». Серія: Економічна теорія та право : зб. наук. праць. – 2013. – № 1 (12). – С. 120–128.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.