Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/8468979/Intergulf-Treo-s-Ans-to-Petn-Rev
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 15:57:38+00:00

Document:
Allapattah Servs., Inc. v. Exxon Corp.
Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.
Franklin v. Marie Antoinette Condominium Owners Assn.
Gatton v. T-Mobile USA, Inc.
McManus v. CIBC World Markets Corp.
Share v. Casiano Bel-Air Homeowners Assn.
Sproul & Rosenberry, Advising Cal. Comon Interest Communities (Cont.
disputed material facts on a motion for summary judgment or adjudication.
court finds a reference agreement exists between the parties.
therefore had no purchase contract with Interguif. [Exh. 26, p 264:12 265:3; Exh.
analysis” on the question of whether CC&Rs fall within the ambit of section 638.
a construction defect dispute between an association and developer. (Opinion p.
directed to the Legislature, not this Court. Review should be denied.
A. The Court Applied the Well Settled Principles of Grafton Partners.
Court’s decision in Graflon Partners v. Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal.4th 944.
considerations relevant to the waiver of trial by jury in civil cases.
parties expressed as prescribed by statute.’” (Grafton Partners v.
caprice of every judge or magistrate in the State.’” (36 Cal.4th at p.
claim under section 638, a statute resulting in a waiver of the right to jury trial.
association and developer for Judicial Reference. Not so.
controversy between the parties arises out of that contract or lease.
developer as defined by the Civil Code.
patently clear when one reviews the statutory elements of a contract.
invitation to revolutionize the theory of contract formation.
expressed as prescribed by statute.” California Constitution, Article I, Section 16.
(1991) 53 Cal.3d 1082, 1098.
This Court should deny review, and defer this issue to the Legislature.
arise from such a statutory scheme could be thoroughly negotiated and addressed.
estate purchase contracts signed after January 1, 2003. Civil Code section 938.
Decision In Villa Milano v. Ii Davorge (2000) 84 cal.App.4th 819.
Decision in this matter is in accord with Villa Milano on this fundamental point.
Association nor Ii Davorge raises this point, so we need not address it at length.
’ 819 at 826 (fn. 4).
the current statutes. There is no conflict of law on this fundamental point.
or between the owners and the association, not the association and developer.
Cal.App.4th 824,828, 833-834; Fourth La Costa Condominium Owners Assn. v.
Seith (2008) 159 Cal.App.4th 563-575, all owner/association disputes..
Cir. 1994) 26 F.3d 1224, 1228-1229 [“relatively unusual and complicated facts”].
association and developer for judicial reference, as required by section 638.
“written contract” under section 638, then it is unconscionable and unenforceable.
courts.”]. In sum, these issues are not “cleanly presented” to this Court.
Court’s review under California Rules of Court, Rule 8.500.
Petition, Association requests the Court consider the following additional issue.
contract” between the Association and Developer under section 638.
drafted, executed, and recorded the CC&Rs against the Treo @ Kettner project.
is required in order to meet the test of unenforceability. Id.
together, evince a public policy favoring jury trials in construction defect actions.
law and motion practice on its head.
processing program used to generate this Answer.
(BY OVERNIGHT MAIL). I caused such documents to be mailed via overnight mail.
November 3, 2008, at San Diego, California.
A&D Fire Protection, Inc. Aztec Sheet Metal, Inc.
% Gary Richard Bond Esq. % Kevin V. DeSantis, Esq.
Dutch Masonry, in pro per East & West Alum Craft, Ltd.
Ecco Manufacturing Spratt Emanuel Engineering, Ltd.
% Mark R. Frederick, Esq.
Kryton International, Inc Paramount Tile, Inc.
% Miles Alperstein % Christoper J. Koorstad, Esq.
Suncrest Cabinets, USA, Inc. Wilkinson Hi Rise, Inc.
Valentine S. Hoy, VIII, Esq. Charles K. Egan, Esq.
Attorneys for INTERGULF CONSTRUCTION Attorneys for ALCALA COMPANY, INC.
James R. Lance, Esq. Benjamin R. Trachtman, Esq.
Tamara A. Laskin, Esq. Michael B. Martin, Esq.
Attorneys for BRIAN COX MECHANICAL, INC.
Gregory D. Hagen, Esq. Brian K. Stewart, Esq.
DRATH CLIFFORD MURPHY & HAGEN, LLP Michael L. Wroniak, Esq.
and MONTIGO DEL RAY CORP.
Donna E. Moore, Esq. Susanneh M. Mitchell, Esq.
OSMAN & ASSOCIATES Chris Cruz, Esq.
Attorneys for GLASS FACTORY, INC.
Charles L. Harris, Esq. John Michael Harmata, Esq.
Thomas A. Balestreri, Esq. Michael M. Edwards, Esq.
Scott Silber, Esq. Craig A. Weeber, Esq.
Attorneys for LAKEVIEW BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC.
Attorneys for McPARLANE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
John A. Simpson, Esq. Chrissa N. Corday, Esq.
Attorneys for MISSION POOLS OF ESCONDIDO, INC.
Timothy S. Noon, Esq. David M. Hall, Esq.
Attorneys for PROFESSIONAL SERWCE INDUSTRIES Attorney for STARLINE WINDOWS, INC.
Keith C. Cramer, Esq. Robert B. Titus, Esq.
GORDON & REES, LLP Brandi G. Wallace, Esq.
Garry McCarthy, Esq. James R. Balich, Esq.
LEWIS BRISBOIS BISGMRD & SMITH, LLP Wilson K. Park, Esq.
John J. Higgins, Esq. Shaun K. Boss, Esq.
Attorneys for VULCAN MATERIALS COMPANY Attorneys for WILLIAM KELLY & SONS, CALIFORNIA, INC.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 V.