Source: http://onomastics.ru/en/content/2018-volume-15-issue-2-6
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 17:04:25+00:00

Document:
Abstract: The article presents a many-faceted approach to the study of the names of body parts attested in modern nicknames of the residents of the Perm region. With over 360 instances of such names collected, the author was able to: 1) compile a register of the reconstructed somatisms, with most productive lexemes also identified, 2) describe the features and functions of the mentioned body parts which happen to be more relevant to nominators, 3) define the “naive anatomy” characteristic of the nicknames, compared to the scientific view. Incidentally, the study discovers a certain “asymmetry” in the description of Homo Somatic the nicknames showcase: the individual organs and their systems may be presented in a detailed / exaggerated / lacunar ways; quite often these onyms are motivated by the names of the prominent exterior elements of the front-upper part of a body (face, mouth), or a belly (mostly that of pregnant women). The nicknames make note of protruding / overhanging features of the said parts, an unusually large size, unusual shape, their excessive character compared to the average, and so on. Functionally-driven scientific accounts of body parts as life necessities are irrelevant to the “naive anatomy”. The everyday language use focuses rather on its own functional and pragmatic aspects. The human body becomes more of a spatial object with its own “landscape” and “topography”. In this regard, somatisms are seen as “landmarks” of the anatomical space, so as the somatically-motivated nicknames act like the landmarks of social space (anthroponyms are a means of distinguishing a “friend” from a “foe”). It is concluded that modern nicknames of the residents of the Perm Region derived from the somatic vocabulary reflect the viability of genetic ties between the names of body parts with the traditional worldview, as much as they testify to the discrepancies between the “naive” and the scientific principles of describing the human anatomy. The nicknames also draw upon the traditional binary oppositions of “friend / foe”, “front / rear”, “upper / lower”, whereas the opposition of “right / left” is irrelevant.
Arutyunova, N. D. (1999). Iazyk i mir cheloveka [Language and the World of Man]. Mosсow: Iazyki russkoi kul’tury.
Bashkatova, Iu. A. (2012). Kul’turnyi smysl somatizmov (na materiale angliiskogo i russkogo iazykov) [The Cultural Meaning of Somatisms (Based on English and Russian Data)]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 4(52), 3, 58–61.
Bashkatova, Iu. A. (2014). Somaticheskii kod kul’tury kak predmet sopostavitel’nogo issledovaniia [The Somatic Code of Culture as a Subject of Comparative Research]. Sibirskii filologicheskii zhurnal, 4, 220–228.
Belyavsky, S. N. (1997). Frazeologizmy govoriat o mnogom: obraznaia frazeologiia nemetskogo iazyka [Idioms Tell us a Lot: German Figurative Phraseology]. Minsk: Vysheishaia shkola.
Berezovich, E. L. (2013). O “sinonimii” perenosnykh upotreblenii somaticheskoi leksiki (na materiale slavianskikh iazykov) [On the “Synonymy” of Figurative Uses of Somatic Vocabulary (on the Material of the Slavic Sanguages)]. In S. M. Tolstaya (Ed.), Ethnolinguistica Slavica (pp. 297–315). Moscow: Indrik.
Berezovich, E. L. (2016a). Dusha i serdtse kak organy “shestogo chuvstva” (na materiale russkogo iazyka) [The Soul and the Heart as Organs of the ‘Sixth Sense’ (on the Russian-language Material]. In E. Masłowska, & D. Pazio-Wlazłowska (Eds.), Dusza w oczach świata [The Soul in the Eyes of the World] (pp. 179–194). Warsaw: Instytut Slawistyki PAN.
Berezovich, E. L. (2016b). Somaticheskaia model’ v nominatsii predchuvstvii i intuitivnykh chuvstvovanii [Somatic Model in the Naming of Premonitions and Intuitive Feelings]. Vestnik Kemerovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 3, 86–93.
Berezovich, E. L., & Leontyeva, T. V. (2007). Chelovek “razumnyi”: iazykovoi obraz duraka [Homo “Sapiens”: Linguistic Image of a Fool]. In E. L. Berezovich, Iazyk i traditsionnaia kul’tura: Etnolingvisticheskie issledovaniia [Language and Traditional Culture: Ethnolinguistic Studies] (pp. 137–150). Moscow: Indrik.
Berezovich, E. L., & Sedakova, I. A. (2012). Slavianskie somatizmy “kozha” i “shkura” i ikh vtorichnye znacheniia [Slavic Somatisms “Skin” and “Fell” and their Secondary Meanings]. Izvestiia RAN, Ser. iazyka i literatury, 71(6), 12–25.
Bilich, G. L., & Zigalova, E. Iu. (2016). Anatomiia cheloveka (Meditsinskii atlas) [Human Anatomy (Medical Atlas)]. Moscow: E.
Bogus, Z. A. (2006). Somatizmy v raznosistemnykh iazykakh: semantiko-slovoobrazovatel’nyi i lingvokul’turologicheskii aspekty (na materiale russkogo, adygeiskogo i angliiskogo iazykov) [Somatisms in the Languages with Different Systems: Semantic-Derivational and Linguo-Cultural Aspects (Based on Russian-, Adyghean- and English-language Material)] (Doctoral dissertation summary). Maykop: Adyghe State University.
Domosiletskaya, M. V. (2011). Anatomicheskie nazvaniia (somatizmy) v Malom dialektologicheskom atlase balkanskikh iazykov (MDABIa) [Anatomical Names (Somatisms) in the Small Dialectological Atlas of Balkan Languages]. In N. A. Bondarko, & N. N. Kazansky (Eds.), Colloquia classica et indogermanica — 5 (pp. 64–100). Saint Petersburg: Nauka.
Egorov, A. V. (2011). Udmurtskaia somaticheskaia frazeologiia (v sopostavlenii s vengerskoi) [Udmurt Somatic Phraseology (in Comparison with Hungarian)]. Ekaterinburg; Izhevsk: Ural Branch of RAS.
Gordy, M. (2010). Somaticheskaia frazeologiia sovremennogo russkogo i pol’skogo iazykov [Somatic Phraseology of the Modern Russian and Polish Languages]. Szczecin: Volumina.
Ivchenkova, E. V. (2011). Somaticheskie frazeologizmy kak iazykovye eksponenty kul’turnykh znakov v gazetnom tekste [Somatic Idioms as Linguistic Exponents of Cultural Signs in the Newspaper Text]. Vesnіk Belaruskaga dziarzhaunaga universiteta, 4, 3, 101–104.
Krasnykh, V. V. (2001). Osnovy psikholingvistiki i teorii kommunikatsii [Foundations of Psycholinguistics and the Theory of Communication]. Moskow: Gnozis.
Kryukov, A. V. (2012). Somaticheskaia leksika v finskoi geograficheskoi terminologii i toponimii Ingermanlandii [Somatic Vocabulary in the Finnish Geographical Terminology and Place Names of Ingermanland]. In N. V. Kuznetsova (Ed.), Fenno-Lapponica Petropolitana (pp. 289–329). Saint-Petersburg: Nauka.
Masaleva, N. V. (2010). Somatizmy v russkoi iazykovoi kartine mira [Somatisms in the Russian-Language Worldview] (Doctoral dissertation). Ivanovo: Ivanovo State University.
Mugu, R. Iu. (2003). Polisemantizm somaticheskoi leksiki (na materiale russkogo i nemetskogo iazykov) [The Polysemy of Somatic Vocabulary (Based on Russian- and German-Language Material)] (Doctoral dissertation summary). Maykop: Adyghe State University.
Omiralieva, Zh. K. (1999). Natsional’no-kul’turnaia spetsifika konventsional’nykh frazeologizmov s somatizmami [National and Cultural Specificity of the Conventional Phraseology with Somatisms]. (Doctoral dissertation summary). Almaty: Al-Farabi Kazakh National University.
Sapin, M. R., & Shvetsov, E. V. (2008). Anatomiia cheloveka [Human Anatomy]. Rostov-on-Don: Feniks.
Sirotkina, T. A. (1999). Antroponimy v leksicheskoi sisteme odnogo govora i ikh leksikografiia v nedifferentsial’nom dialektnom slovare (na materiale govora derevni Akchim Krasnovisherskogo raiona Permskoi oblasti) [Anthroponyms in the Lexical System of a Single Dialect and their Lexicographic Presentation in a General Dialectal Dictionary (with Reference to Akchim Village Dialect, Krasnovishersk District, Perm Region)] (Doctoral dissertation). Perm: Perm State University.
Starykh, O. V. (2011). Somatizmy kak osobyi klass slov v leksicheskoi sisteme tserkovnoslavianskogo iazyka [Somatisms as a Specific Class of Words in the Church Slavonic Lexical System]. Vestnik Pravoslavnogo Sviato-Tikhonovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta, 3: Filologiia, 2 (24), 80–85.
Surikova, O. D. (2013). Otsomaticheskie obrazovaniia s pristavkoi bez- v russkom i ukrainskom antroponimikone [Derivatives of Somatisms Prefixed with bez- in Russian and Ukrainian Anthroponymy]. Voprosy onomastiki, 1 (14), 58–78.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.