Source: http://digital.ontarioreports.ca/ontarioreports/20190412?pg=93
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 11:00:23+00:00

Document:
exception in s. 258.1(2)(a), which permits use or disclosure for investigations and proceedings for listed offences. Interpreting the Criminal Code in this manner is consistent with an accused’s constitutional right to disclosure, while protecting the identities of others who have been tested, which are irrelevant to the accused’s trial.
R. v. Awashish,  S.C.J. No. 45, 2018 SCC 45, 31 M.V.R. (7th) 1, 49 C.R.
466; R. v. McNeil,  1 S.C.R. 66,  S.C.J. No. 3, 2009 SCC 3, 246 O.A.C.
130 N.R. 277,  1 W.W.R. 97, 83 Alta. L.R. (2d) 193, 120 A.R. 161, 68 C.C.C.
Bell ExpressVu Limited Partnership v. Rex,  2 S.C.R. 559,  S.C.J. No.
407 D.L.R. (4th) 383, 2017EXP-643, EYB 2017-276538, 135 W.C.B. (2d) 356; R. v.
2 S.C.R. 9,  S.C.J. No. 36, 114 D.L.R. (4th) 419, 166 N.R. 245, J.E. 94-778, EYB 1994-67655, 71 O.A.C. 241, 89 C.C.C. (3d) 402, 29 C.R. (4th) 243, 23 W.C.B.
C.R.R. (2d) 1, EYB 2006-104246, 69 W.C.B. (2d) 741; R. v. Stipo,  O.J. No.
4648, 2017 ONSC 5208, 18 M.V.R. (7th) 72, 141 W.C.B. (2d) 287 (S.C.J.); Rizzo & Rizzo Shoes Ltd. (Re) (1998), 36 O.R. (3d) 418,  1 S.C.R. 27,  S.C.J. No.
White Burgess Langille Inman v. Abbott and Haliburton Co.,  2 S.C.R. 182,  S.C.J. No. 23, 2015 SCC 23, 18 C.R. (7th) 308, 470 N.R. 324, 383 D.L.R.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.