Source: https://shimodalaw.com/class_actions.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 16:53:26+00:00

Document:
Class Actions | Case Results | Shimoda Law Corp.
Aanerud, et al. v. Neumann LTD, et al.
Acosta v. Acosta Sales, LLC, et al.
Adams-Anguay v. Placer Title Company, et al.
Arnall v. North American Merchandising Service Inc.
Arrington, et al. v. Capital Express Lines, Inc., et al.
Bershell v. Dignity Health, et al.
Blig v. Medical Management International, Inc.
Camacho, et al. v. Z Street, Inc. d.b.a. Tower CafÃ©, et al.
Cannon v. Miller Event Management, Inc., et al.
Carlos v. Abel Mendoza, Inc., et al.
Cirrincione v. American Scissor Lift, Inc., et al.
Colbert v. American Home Craft Inc.
Cress, et al. v. Mitsubishi Chemical Carbon Fiber and Composites, Inc.
De Arcos v. Amware Pallet Services, LLC, et al.
Garcia v. A-L Financial Corp.
Garcia v. Royal Plywood Company, LLC, et al.
Gerard v. Les Schwab Tires Center of California, Inc.
Gilliam v. Matrix Energy Services, Inc.
Gomez v. Mayflower Farms Incorporated, et al.
Hartwell v. Techforce Telecome, Inc.
Hernandez, et al. v. MP Nexlevel of California, Inc., et al.
Jackson v. U.S. Remodelers, Inc. Which Will Do Business in California as Home Depot Interiors, et al.
Jaime Alatorre v. SSMB Pacific Holding Company, Inc., et al.
Jaramillo v. Mayahuel Investors LP, et al.
Martinez v. J.C. Trucking, Inc., et al.
Muhieddine v. KBA Docusys, Inc., et al.
Olivares v. Ralphs Grocery Company, et al.
Prasad v. D. G. Smith Enterprises, Inc.
Ralston v. JMJ, Inc., et al.
Rickwalt v. Direct Reconditioning, LLC, et al.
Rogers v. Les Schwab Tires Center of California, Inc.
Romaine v. Queen of the Valley Medical Center, et al.
Romero, et al. v. University Retirement Community at Davis, Inc., et al.
Scarano v. J. R. Putman, Inc., et al.
Schechter et al. v. Isys Solutions, Inc.
Smith v. Capitol Administrators, Inc.
ullivan v. National Response Corporation, et al.
Talent v. Leslieâ€™s Poolmart, Inc.
Toupe, et al. v. Phenomenex, Inc., et al.
Waltrip v. Service Now Enterprises, Inc., et al.
Watson v. Quarter at a Time, LLC, et al.
The Shimoda Law Corp. has litigated and/or is litigating the following class action lawsuits on behalf of California employees.
Plaintiffs alleged parking valets were not paid overtime and minimum wages, were subjected to unlawful deduction policies, and not provided meal and rest periods.
Plaintiffs alleged failure to pay overtime, off the clock wages, reimbursement, among other unpaid wages owed. This case was a national class action and collective action that extended beyond California and involved the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants failed to pay all wages owed, including gender pay disparities in violation of the California Equal Pay Act.
Plaintiffs alleged the failure to pay contract wages, failure to pay all wages due at separation, the failure to provide sick time, the failure to provide accurate paystubs, and derivative violations under the Private Attorneys General Act.
Plaintiff alleged that employees were not paid overtime for all hours worked in excess of eight (8) hours per day and/or forty (40) hours per week.
Plaintiffs alleged that the employer paid truck drivers under a piece rate system (where plaintiffs earned money based only on miles driven) that did not comply with Californiaâ€™s minimum wage law. Plaintiffs also alleged the employer failed to pay wages for hours spent loading/unloading trucks or waiting in the trucks and failed to reimburse plaintiffs for expenses associated with their travel.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants failed to pay overtime and failed to provide all meal and rest periods in accordance with California law.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendant failed to provide all meal and rest periods in accordance with California law, thus leading to claims for unpaid meal period premiums.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendant failed to pay all overtime due and provided inaccurate wage statements under the Private Attorneys General Act.
Plaintiffs are Spanish speakers who brought claims for meal and rest period violations and paycheck stub violations. Defendants had a policy to automatically clock out workers for 30 minutes whether they took the full meal break or not.
Plaintiff and others worked as event staff at various entertainment venues. Defendant failed to pay overtime, pay minimum wages, provide meal and rest periods, and subjected employees to unlawful deduction policies.
Plaintiffs alleged they were not provided all meal and rest periods and they were not compensated for all such meal and rest periods, particularly the second meal period in a workday.
Plaintiffs alleged Defendant failed to compensate them for all non-productive time under a piece rate compensation agreement and failed to provide reimbursement or rest periods in accordance with California Law.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendant failed to pay proper overtime wages based on the regular rate of pay and failed to provide all meal and rest periods and reimbursement expenses.
Plaintiff alleged the unlawful witholding of vacation wages at separation, failure to pay all wages at separation, the failure to maintain a lawful sick leave policy, and failure to provide compliant wage statements.
Plainitff alleged that employees, telemarketers, were not paid for all hours worked, failed to receive the correct amount of bonuses, and were forced to report to work and sent home without pay.
Plaintiffs alleged that Defendant failed to pay all overtime due and failed to provide all meal and rest periods to employees.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendant failed to provide meal and rest period premiums and failed to provide accurate wage statements.
Plaintiff alleged that the employer misclassified its employees working as â€œcollectorsâ€� and as a result failed to pay overtime and minimum wages as well as failed to pay all reimbursements owed.
Plaintiff alleged failure to provide reimbursement expenses for use of personal vehicles, failure to pay all hours worked, and failure to pay overtime under unlawful piece rate and travel time compensation policies.
Plaintiff alleged the failure to pay overtime due to unlawful timekeeping policies, the failure to provide all meal and rest periods due, and other, derivative violations.
Plaintiff alleged that the employerâ€™s piece rate compensation system failed to pay for overtime or for all hours worked. Plaintiff also alleged failure to pay reimbursement expenses and failure to provide meal and rest periods.
Plaintiff alleged that he and other employees in the tree trimming industry worked under several prevailing wage classifications without being paid the prevailing wage for each type of work performed, and that they were required to work prior to the official start of their work day, thereby incurring additional overtime hours that were uncompensated.
Plaintiffs alleged the employer failed to pay all wages owed or provide all legally required meal and rest breaks due to its scheduling policies as well as its policies of deducting compensable time and requiring off-the-clock work be performed.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendant failed to compensate for all non-productive time, leading to overtime and minimum wages violations as well as inaccurate wage statements.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants failed to pay proper overtime and minimum wages; failed to provide proper meal and rest periods; failed to pay all reimbursement expenses; and failed to provide proper itemized wage statements, resulting in further derivative statutory and civil penalties.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants failed to pay proper overtime wages based on the regular rate of pay, which should have incorporated production bonuses.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants failed to provide all meal and rest periods and reimbursement expenses, failed to provide split-shift premiums, and failed to keep accurate time records or provide accurate wage statements, resulting in further derivative statutory and civil penalties.
Plaintiff alleged unpaid overtime, unpaid reimbursements, and wage statement violations for home health workers.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants did not pay all overtime and minimum wages; did not provide all meal and rest periods and reimbursement expenses; and did not provide accurate wage statements.
Plaintiff, a technician, alleged that Defendant failed to record time accurately and misclassified him as exempt, resulting in the failure to pay overtime and minimum wages among other derivative statutory violations.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendant failed to provide all meal and rest periods owed to them and failed to pay all wages due.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants did not pay all final wages in a timely manner.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendant failed to provide all information required on wage statements issued to employees.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendant failed to provide all meal and rest periods owed to them.
Plaintiffs alleged that the employer failed to pay all overtime and minimum wages and rest period premiums due to Defendantsâ€™ piece-rate compensation system.
Plaintiffs alleged the employer failed to provide employees with meal and rest periods, triggering derivative penalty claims.
Plaintiff alleged that he and other assistant managers were misclassified and failed to receive proper overtime and meal and rest breaks.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants did not pay proper overtime wages due to regular rate of pay calculation errors, did not pay all minimum wages, did not provide all meal or rest periods, did not provide accurate itemized wage statements, and did not keep accurate time records, resulting in further derivative penalties.
Plaintiffs alleged that Defendant did pay proper overtime wages and meal period premiums due to the regular rate of pay calculation.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants did not pay all overtime and minimum wages; did not provide all meal and rest periods and reimbursement expenses; did not provide accurate wage statements; failed to provide written commissions contracts; and failed to provide paid sick leave, resulting in further derivative statutory and civil penalties.
Plaintiffs were nurses who worked from home and traveled to different destinations to provide care. The Complaint alleged failure by the company to pay overtime, off the clock wages, and unreimbursed expenses.
Plaintiff alleged the employer provided non-compliant wage statements, triggering statutory and civil penalties.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants did not pay all overtime and minimum wages; did not provide all meal and rest periods and reimbursement expenses; did not provide accurate wage statements; failed to provide wages in a timely manner; and failed to keep accurate time records, resulting in further derivative statutory and civil penalties.
Plaintiffs claimed that the employer failed to provide tools and failed to reimburse employees for tools they had to purchase.
Plaintiffs alleged that the employer unlawfully failed to pay overtime and minimum wages, provide meal and rest periods, or provide accurate wage statements with derivative PAGA violations due to rounding, deduction, and scheduling policies.
Plaintiff alleged at Defendants failed to pay for all non-productive time, leading to unpaid overtime, minimum wages and inaccurate wage statements being issued to employees.
Plaintiff alleged that Defendants engaged in an unlawful tip-pooling system and required employees to work off the clock, leading to unpaid wages and unpaid tips.
Plaintiff alleged that telemarketers were not provided full ten (10) minute rest breaks for each four (4) hours worked.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.