Source: https://www.courts.state.md.us/coappeals/petitions/201109petitions
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 04:11:28+00:00

Document:
Broom, Ojdo v. State - Case No. 65, September Term 2011.
ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - WHERE A PERSON IS OTHERWISE ENTITLED TO HAVE RECORDS RELATED TO A CRIMINAL CHARGE EXPUNGED, DOES THE FACT THAT THE PERSON PREVIOUSLY HAD ANOTHER UNRELATED CHARGE STETTED MEAN THAT HE OR SHE CONTINUES TO BE “A DEFENDANT IN A PENDING CRIMINAL PROCEEDING,” AND THEREFORE INELIGIBLE FOR THE REMEDY OF EXPUNGEMENT?
Broom, Ojdo v. State - Case No. 66, September Term 2011.
Davis, Tyrone v. State - Case No. 59, September Term 2011.
ISSUE - CRIMINAL LAW - DID THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY DENY PETITIONER’S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE SEIZED AS A RESULT OF A WIRETAP?
Foster, Craig v. State - Case No. 64, September Term 2011.
Hamilton, Frances V. v. Baltimore Police Department - Case No. 61, September Term 2010.
ISSUES - PUBLIC SAFETY - (1) WHO HOLDS THE ULTIMATE RESPONSIBILITY FOR TRANSMITTAL OF THE RECORD UNDER MD RULE 7-206? (2) DID A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLY WITH MD. RULE 7-206 WHEN THE DELAY IN TRANSMITTAL WAS AT LEAST IN PART DUE TO THE LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCY’S ACTIONS OR INACTIONS WHICH RESULTED IN ONE DAY BEYOND THE TIME LIMITS AS PRESCRIBED BY MD. RULE 7-206(c)?
(3) DID THE RESPONDENT DENY A POLICE OFFICER’S RIGHT UNDER THE LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS’ BILL OF RIGHTS (LEOBR) WHEN IT REFUSED TO PLACE THE POLICE OFFICER ON ACTIVE DUTY OR SUSPENDED WITH PAY STATUS BEFORE IT SCHEDULED A TRIAL BOARD HEARING?
People's Insurance Counsel Division v. Allstate Insurance Company, et al. - Case No. 60, September Term 2011.
ISSUES - INSURANCE - (1) DID THE LOWER COURT ERR IN CONCLUDING THAT INS. SEC. 27-501(a)(2) HAS NO APPLICABILITY TO AN INSURER’S DECISION NOT TO PROVIDE HOMEOWNER’S INSURANCE TO A PARTICULAR GEOGRAPHICAL AREA IN THE STATE? (2) DID THE LOWER COURTS CORRECTLY CONCLUDE BASED ON ESTABLISHED PRINCIPLES OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW & JUDICIAL REVIEW THAT SUBSTANTIAL EVIDENCE SUPPORTED THE COMMISSIONER’S FINAL ORDER?
Roberts, Barry v. State - Case No. 63, September Term 2011.
ISSUES - CRIMINAL LAW - (1) WHETHER “SOME EVIDENCE” OF SELF-DEFENSE CAN BE GENERATED BY THE DEFENDANT THROUGH CROSS-EXAMINATION OF THE STATE’S WITNESSES SUFFICIENT TO JUSTIFY A PERFECT OR IMPERFECT DEFENSE TO THE CHARGE OF MURDER? (2) WHETHER THE TRIAL COURT ERRED DURING SENTENCING WHEN IT TOOK INTO ACCOUNT IMPERMISSIBLE CONSIDERATIONS RELATING TO UNCHARGED CONDUCT FOR WHICH NO RELIABLE EVIDENCE EXISTED WHEN DETERMINING PETITIONER’S SENTENCE?
State v. Reginald Stringfellow - Case No. 62, September Term 2011.
ISSUES - CRIMINAL LAW - (1) DID RESPONDENT WAIVE HIS APPELLATE COMPLAINT THAT A VOIR DIRE QUESTION IRREPARABLY BIASED THE ENTIRE JURY AGAINST HIM BY ACCEPTING THE JURY AS EMPANELED? (2) DID THE TRIAL COURT PROPERLY EXERCISE ITS DISCRETION TO ASK THE CHALLENGED VOIR DIRE QUESTIONS WHICH INTENDED TO IDENTIFY ANY PROSPECTIVE JUROR BIASED IN FAVOR OR FORENSIC EVIDENCE TO THE EXCLUSION OF ALL OTHER EVIDENCE? (3) IF THE TRIAL COURT ERRED, IS THE ERROR HARMLESS BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT IN LIGHT OF OTHER CONTEMPORANEOUS VOIR DIRE, THE PRESENTATION OF EVIDENCE, THE FINAL INSTRUCTIONS OF THE TRIAL COURT & THE ARGUMENTS OF COUNSEL?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.