Source: https://pl.scribd.com/document/401633715/DAmato-Complaint-pdf
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 16:31:18+00:00

Document:
act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.
rights granted him by the Constitution or by law.
and is entitled to protection by society and the State.
as in association with others.
wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.
rights and freedoms set forth herein.
claims arising under 42 u.s.c. §1983.
days have elapsed since the service of those notices, and no offer of settlement has been made.
2017 - October 2,2017 as referred to hereinafter. No other hearings have been conducted.
request a jury trial on all issues and claims set forth in this Complaint.
resident of the County of Nassau, State of New York.
Commission at the time. Mr. Schreiber received a sentence of straight probation.
times was, and still is, a resident of the County of Nassau, State of New York.
10. The Defendant, Park Strategies, LLC is a parent enterprise pursuant to 18 u.s.c.
of Nassau, State of New York.
Country Road, Suite 800, Garden City, New York, in the County of Nassau, State of New York.
practices, and customs ofthe Nassau County Police Department ("NCPD").
of the Defendant, Nassau County.
usage of Nassau County and the State of New York.
regulations, policies, customs, and usage of Nassau County and the State of New York.
policies, customs and usage of Nassau County and the State of New York.
upon information and belief, is licensed to practice medicine in the State of New York.
Communities Hospital located in Nassau County, State of New York.
September 30 - October 2,2017.
located at 990 Westbury Road, Suite 202, Westbury, County of Nassau, State of New York.
existing under and by virtue of the laws ofthe State of New York.
Catherine Cash and, upon information and belief, a retired New York City fireman.
J ames Cash and a Suffolk County Police Officer.
Justice in the County of Nassau and employed by the State of New York.
Nassau, residing at Roslyn Heights, New York.
Operating Officer of International Investigation Group (IIG), Ltd.
Investigation Group, Ltd. and acting in such capacity.
11530, in Nassau County and authorized to do business in the State of New York.
plaintiff afforded the defendants a 50-h exam under the Municipal Law on November 19, 2018.
refused by the defendants County of Nassau and County of Suffolk.
children from that union, Alfonso, d/o!b: 2/5/08 and Luciana, d/o!b: 10116/09. This is Mrs.
corporate entities and acquired interests in still others operating at that location and elsewhere.
He is an attorney. Park Strategies, LLC is also the parent enterprise pursuant to 18 Us. C.
she was also a full time mother to her two children.
a result she has undergone fourteen surgeries, the last of which occurred on September 19, 2017.
Nassau's Supreme Court. Mr. D' Amato is not a party in that action.
was settled in May, 2017 wherein Mr. D' Amato deeded over the former marital home to Mrs.
Cooper in New York County Supreme Court.
bedroom. Her son was not home.
back of a closet, key locked and without ammunition.
53. When the police arrived they barged their way into the home and awakened Mr.
2017. The shotgun was also seized.
to show cause application" for ex parte protective orders. (Anonymous v. Anonymous, Index No.
appeared before Justice Matthew Cooper in New York County Supreme Court on Mrs.
D' Amato's divorce action. Justice Cooper transferred just the temporary custody part of Mrs.
New York County action and is a defendant in the Nassau action.
they still have not been completed.
interlocutory appeals pending in the Appellate Division.
so far that too has not occurred.
criminal charge against Mrs. D' Amato claiming that Mr. Cash was "chest bumped" by her. Mrs.
of the two actions but improperly made the plaintiff a defendant in the Nassau divorce action.
charge of harassment as a violation, the Court also entered a protective order against Mrs.
D' Amato to "refrain from harassment" of her neighbors, to wit: Mr. & Mrs. Cash and their son.
result in an arrest and a charge of criminal contempt, an A misdemeanor.
62. Mrs. Cash is a Suffolk County Police Officer. Mr. & Mrs. Cash are friends of Mr.
once again reported to Mr. D' Amato and summoned him to the scene.
Mrs. D' Amato looking at her, giving her "the finger" and mouthing obscenities at her.
lapsed since the filing of all Notices of Claim.
pled not guilty on both charges. Motions to dismiss are pending in the Nassau District Court.
July 31, 2018 (D 'Amato v. Cash, Index No. 60977/2018).
Assistant District Attorney in her office.
the events of September 30,2017.
4 Defined in DSM V as an Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder.
charged on June 25,2018 and to have a protective order illegally entered against her.
violation cases, thereby causing the false arrests and imprisonment of defendants.
to domestic incidents and "mentally aided calls".
evidence of a domestic incident.
and Federal laws requiring such a nexus in order for them to deprive a person of .
his or her Constitutional rights.
Constitutional rights of persons within their jurisdiction.
Police Department and Justice Lorintz both obstructed the disclosure of these documents.
custody to a hospital on a mentally aided call, they failed to implement a corrective policy.
practices and proceeded to lie about them while under oath.
New York County action. They only did so after I moved to dismiss the Nassau County action.
attempted to negotiate a separation agreement.
violation of my State and Federal civil rights.
have served on the Town of Hempstead Board of Zoning Appeals for the past fifteen years.
had an undisclosed $39 million dollars in it.
regarding his alleged breach of that So Ordered Stipulation of Settlement. See also 18 u.s. C.
Constitution, and the laws of New York.
in violation of State and Federal laws.
96. Defendants, despite knowing that probable cause did not exist to enter Mrs.
is to be free of unreasonable searches and seizures.
v. City of Glen Falls, 908 F.3d 19 (2 nd Cir. 2018).
June 25,2018 and July 31,2018.
plaintiff, Mrs. D' Amato's Constitutional rights.
process, malicious and vindictive prosecution.
101. The defendants intended to confine the plaintiff in the hospital and jail; Mrs.
determined at trial, believed to be in excess of FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS ($50,000,000.00).
material exculpatory and impeachment evidence from the defense, thereby depriving Mrs.
D' Amato of her clearly established constitutional rights, pursuant to the Fourteenth Amendment.
on or about June 25 and July 31,2018. See, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963); Kyles v.
Whitley, 514 U.S. 419 (1995) and People v. Rosario, 9 N.Y.2d 286 (1961).
from her home on September 30,2017.
September 30,2017 when she testified in December, 2017 during a temporary custody hearing.
due process oflaw, and to due process in both the Supreme Court and District Court.
113. Defendants' conspired to deprive Mrs. D' Amato of her basic Constitutional rights.
a. Defendants Alfonse D' Amato and Nassau Police personnel responding to Mrs.
and IIG more than supports this allegation.
June 25 and July 31, 2018 as herein described.
d. Defendants Alfonse D' Amato, Mark Green, Stephen Gassman, Joshua Gruner and.
of Mrs. D' Amato's counsel, the suppression of evidence and expert testimony.
Constitutional rights to due process oflaw.
Defendant Police officers', prosecutors' and co-defendants' actions.
Constitution of the United States and federal laws.
d. Deliberately suppressed the truth about their misconduct.
arrested, charged and prosecuted without probable cause.
continuing injuries and damages set forth herein.
127. The issuance of protective orders in violation cases and a "zero tolerance policy"
civil rights and brutalizing them; by negligent hiring, training and supervision.
within their domain and jurisdiction.
($50,000,000.00) plus pre and post judgment interest, costs, disbursements and attorneys' fees.
irreparable harm, both short and long term set forth herein.
to a "psych ward" on September 30,2017 and wrongfully charged on June 25 and July 31,2018.
assaulted and battered Mrs. D'Amato.
apprehension of exacerbation of pre-existing and other assaults and batteries.
machine on September 30, 2017 which caused her excruciating pain.
detennined at trial, believed to be in excess of FIFTY MILLION DOLLARS ($50,000,000.00).
and/or was reasonably foreseeable to NCPD supervisors.
distress under the doctrine of respondeat superior.
aided calls" and proper discretion in the charging function.
maliciously prosecuted and falsely arrested and taken from her home.
N ew York and as a result, called 911.
Ocean, it is elevated. The first floor consists of a garage, some utilities and storage space.
indication of any domestic dispute at the time of the call or when the police arrived at the home.
believe that a crime was being committed therein or that any Domestic Violence was occurring.
bellowing his same inquiry and finally waking Mr. D' Amato, albeit not Luciana.
South Nassau Communities Hospital on a "mentally aided call".
New York's Freedom of Information Law.
wrongfully withheld from plaintiff by the police..
kidnaping, false imprisonment, larceny, assault, battery, negligence, defamation and burglary.
a danger to herself or others.
the State's Mental Hygiene Law and their own protocols on September 30,2017.
plaintiff was unwarrantedly taken from her home, held in a hospital for three (3) days against her.
thereby proximately caused these serious damages.
that day, at any time prior to it, or at any time thereafter.
that she was "crazy"; that "she was taking pictures oflasers coming into the house on his phone".
a tactical advantage over his wife in the matrimonial case.
the system to his advantage.
183. In essence, he tricked the police and they fell for it.
severe damage to her and her children all under color oflaw.
inquiring of the police as to why Mrs. D' Amato was being brought to the hospital.
the actions of its employees, physicians and subordinates.
stay in the hospital from September 30, 2017 to October 2,2017.
on October 2,2017 after keeping her for more than two (2) days and 48 hours against her will.
Murphy, just prior to September 30,2017. On September 30, 2017 Mr. D' Amato called Mr.
following day in order to commence his matrimonial and custody proceedings.
another violation of the law.
medical condition known as ADHD and accordingly also violated the ADA.
from customary medical practices and procedures in the community.
she should be admitted or detained in the hospital and not immediately discharged from it.
erroneously and in error relied upon on October 5, 2017; October 10,2017 and October 11,2017.
per se in her trade and profession and deprived her of parental and civil rights.
co-defendant, Deputy Police Commissioner David Mack.
compiling and issuing a false and defamatory police report which was then used by Mr.
Mrs. D' Amato's non-existent psychosis and that she was taking "Lithium" and "Oxycodone"
causing irreparable harm and damage to her and her children.
and Patrol Supervisor Lorenzen were both present at scene.
police failed to inquire of Mr. or Mrs. D' Amato as to whether there was any "domestic incident"
plaintiff by a poorly trained and unqualified Police Officer Adamo who failed to see through Mr.
fabrications and lies as told to them by Mr. D' Amato.
by each defendant as specified in the following cause of action.
216. On October 3, 2017 the plaintiff commenced a divorce action against Mr.
D' Amato in New York County under Index No. 309600/2017. Mr. D' Amato was then served.
His attorneys, by Joshua Gruner, then acknowledged service on October 4,2017.
Mrs. D' Amato to undergo psychiatric testing, among other things.
been commenced two (2) days earlier by the plaintiff. The preparation of those papers and Mr.
D' Amato swearing under oath to their truthfulness was perjury and subornation of perjury.
learned of the ex parte applications" all the while knowing that Mrs.
and the fact that one of her arm was in a sling on September 30,2017."
7 The courtroom is open to the public and the media has closely followed the case.
for an ex parte order dated October 4,2017.
defendant had been attempting to load her shotgun." See par. 11, supra.
by defendant D' Amato to the police and incorporated into their report.
June,2017. Thus, it was no longer "our" home.
As to the Defendant, Stephen Gassman, Esq.
dated October 4,2017 in support of the ex parte applications.
unknown period of time without the plaintiffs knowledge or consent.
should be left unprotected prior to the request being submitted."
she has additional weapons in the residence or elsewhere at her disposal."
mental state and psychological history renders this an emergency."
between the parties have been resolved by prior agreements."
As to the Defendant Joshua B. Gruner, Esq.
defendant Mack had prepared a false report.
disposal either in the marital residence or elsewhere."
ambulance or 911. This is another patent falsehood.
improper conduct of these defendants. In addition, the defendants' Cash falsely stated that Mrs.
and defame Mrs. D' Amato which then occurred in various news accounts.
to himself which he does not have.
contributed to the Justice's 2016 campaign for the position which he now holds and Mr.
AFC and forensic psychologist notwithstanding numerous requests that he do so.
record as required by the Code of Professional Responsibility.
influence of Mr. D'Amato, his attorneys and the AFC.
233. Since his appointment in the matrimonial case in or about October 5,2017 Mr.
Green has acted as an antagonist to the plaintiff and her children.
235. Mr. Green's fees and those ofthe forensic psychologist are being paid by Mr.
position or argument favoring the plaintiff and her children.
subject of interlocutory appeals pending in the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department.
battery upon the person of Katuria D' Amato by Defendant Police officers.
the plaintiff, Katuria D' Amato regarding the events of June 25,2018 and July 31,2018.
suffering as a result of the intentional, reckless and negligent acts of Defendants.
litigation, public ridicule and embarrassment.
31,2018. See also, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963).
Nassau County Police Department employees.
unlawful conduct taken against plaintiff, Katuria D' Amato.
Plaintiff, Katuria D' Amato, without justification, out of disinterested malevolence.
Nassau County Police Department, as per the above allegations.
and/or Nassau County Police Department for the position of Police Officer.
Defendants, Nassau County and/or Nassau County Police Department.
Hygiene Law and other actions as set forth herein.
incidents known to Defendants Nassau County and/or Nassau County Police Department.
screening the hiring of and training of them.
for civil rights of the public and individuals in their custody or under their control.
violation of her civil rights.
§487 Complaints that Allege Attorney Deceit, N.Y.L.J., January 31,2019 at 4 and 8.
and Weinberg v. Sultan, 142 A.D.3d 767, 769 (1 st Dept. 2016).
§3016(b) and Weinstein, Korn and Miller CPLR Manual 19.09(b). See also, Pludeman v.
Armstrong v. Blank Rome, N.Y. Sup. 2014 WL 912263 at 1.
infliction of emotional distress and public humiliation.
Stipulation of October 11, 2017.
emotional, to the plaintiff and her children.
arraignments of those charges on July 16 and August 10, 2018 respectively.
without any repercussions to her and in violation of Mrs. D' Amato's Constiutitonal rights.
Mrs. D' Amato's Constitutional rights.
intentionally, recklessly, arbitrarily and capriciously.
Gold Smith and the Law Offices of Thomas F. Liotti, LLC and further tampered with her (Ms.
offered Mrs. Gold Smith emoluments and other consideration if she would approach Mrs.
time he surveiled Mrs. D' Amato and tried to have her arrested on that date and at other times.
other rights referred to herein.
did so in this case of the defendant, Justice Joseph H. Lorintz.
2018 and Newsday Editorial, August 21,2015, A Disturbing Expose of Patronage Politics.
million dollars in it which Mr. D' Amato used for personal expenses and campaign contributions.
in the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, 18 Us.c. §1964.
County Supreme Court Index No. 20247712017); October 10,2017 (see, supra, Anonymous v.
have deprived Mrs. D' Amato and her children of their Constitutional and parental rights.
Matthew Cooper in New York County and the Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department.
campaign contributions that he makes.
Mr. David Smith conspiring together to tamper with Mrs. D' Amato's witnesses, including Mrs.
joined in by IIG to have Mrs. D' Amato arrested on April 2, 2018.
described; and further Mr. D' Amato should be required to cease and desist from forging Mrs.
campaign contributions in return for access, favorable rulings or legislation and his quid pro quo.
BY: THOMAS F. LIOTTI, ESQ.
People of the Philippines, Appellee, Vs. Elizabeth “Beth” Corpuz, Appellant.

References: §1983
 v. 
 v. 

v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 

§487
 v. 

§3016
 v.

 v. 
 §1964
 v.