Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Sec-171-Alternative-limitations.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 17:14:36+00:00

Document:
164 111. 245, 45 N. E. 498, distinguishing Blatchford v. Newberry, 99 111. 11; Aspy v. Lewis, 152 Ind. 493, 52 N. E. 756; Moore v. Lyons, 25 Wend. (N. Y.) 119; Embury v. Sheldon, 68 N. Y. 235; Black v. Woods, 213 Pa. 583, 63 Atl. 129; Hansford v. Elliott, 9 Leigh (Va.) 79; Allison v. Allison, 101 Va. 537, 44 S. E. 904, 63 L. R. A. 920, 44 S. E. 904.
17. 2 Jarman, Wills, 1010; 1 Underhill, Wills, Sec. 14; Scott v. Harwood, 5 Madd. 332; Merriam v. Simonds, 121 Mass. 198; Wood v. McGuire, 15 Ga. 202; Downing v. Marshall, 23 N. Y. 373.
18. See ante, Sec. 139.
Underhill, Wills, Sec. 554; Oppen-heim v. Henry, 10 Hare, 441; Hall v. Hall, 123 Mass. 120; Hill v. Rockingham Bank, 45 N. H. 270.
20. 2 Jarman, Wills, 1010; Baldwin v. Rogers, 3 De Gex, M. & G. 649.
21. Leake, Prop. in Land, 364; Fearne, Cont. Rem. 514; Smith Executory Interests, Sec.Sec. 128, 136; Stephens v. Stephens, cas. temp. Talb. 228. For instance, in the case of a devise to A in fee simple, with a limitation over, in the event of A's death before arriving at twenty-one, to C, and, in the event of C's previous death, then to D, there are alternative executory limitations to C and D.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.