Source: https://www.casebriefs.com/blog/law/constitutional-law/constitutional-law-keyed-to-chemerinsky/first-amendment-freedom-of-expression/frohwerk-v-united-states/
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 10:02:32+00:00

Document:
Turner Broadcasting System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission 512 U.S. 622, 114 S. Ct. 2445, 129 L. Ed. 2d 497, 1994 U.S.
Simon & Schuster, Inc. v. Members of the New York State Crime Victims Board 502 U.S. 105, 112 S. Ct. 501, 116 L. Ed. 2d 476, 1991 U.S.
City of Renton v. Playtime Theaters, Inc 475 U.S. 41, 106 S. Ct. 925, 89 L. Ed. 2d 29, 1986 U.S.
Boos v. Berry 485 U.S. 312, 108 S. Ct. 1157, 99 L. Ed. 2d 333, 1988 U.S.
National Endowment for the Arts v. Finley 524 U.S. 569, 118 S. Ct. 2168, 141 L. Ed. 2d 500, 1998 U.S.
Near v. State of Minnesota ex rel. Olsen 283 U.S. 697, 51 S. Ct. 625, 75 L. Ed. 1357, 1931 U.S.
New York Times Company v. United States 403 U.S. 713, 91 S. Ct. 2140, 29 L. Ed. 2d 822, 1971 U.S.
Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart 427 U.S. 539, 96 S. Ct. 2791, 49 L. Ed. 2d 683, 1976 U.S.
Alexander v. United States 509 U.S. 544, 113 S. Ct. 2766, 125 L. Ed. 2d 441, 1993 U.S.
United States v. National Treasury Employees Union 513 U.S. 454, 115 S. Ct. 1003, 130 L. Ed. 2d 964, 1995 U.S.
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette 319 U.S. 624, 63 S. Ct. 1178, 87 L. Ed. 1628, 1943 U.S.
Buckley v. American Constitutional Law Foundation, Inc 525 U.S. 182, 119 S. Ct. 636, 142 L. Ed. 2d 599, 1999 U.S.
McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Commission 514 U.S. 334, 115 S. Ct. 1511, 131 L. Ed. 2d 426, 1995 U.S.
Rust v. Sullivan 500 U.S. 173, 111 S. Ct. 1759, 114 L. Ed. 2d 233, 1991 U.S.
Schenck v. United States 249 U.S. 47, 39 S. Ct. 247, 63 L. Ed. 470, 1919 U.S.
Frohwerk v. United States 249 U.S. 204, 39 S. Ct. 249, 63 L. Ed. 561, 1919 U.S.
Debs v. United States 249 U.S. 211, 39 S. Ct. 252, 63 L. Ed. 566, 1919 U.S.
Abrams v. United States 250 U.S. 616, 40 S. Ct. 17, 63 L. Ed. 1173, 1919 U.S.
Gitlow v. New York 268 U.S. 652, 45 S. Ct. 625, 69 L. Ed. 1138, 1925 U.S.
Whitney v. California 274 U.S. 357, 47 S. Ct. 641; 71 L. Ed. 1095; 1927 U.S.
Dennis v. United States 341 U.S. 494, 71 S. Ct. 857, 95 L. Ed. 1137, 1951 U.S.
Brandenburg v. Ohio 395 U.S. 444, 89 S. Ct. 1827, 23 L. Ed. 2d 430, 1969 U.S.
Gooding v. Wilson 405 U.S. 518, 92 S. Ct. 1103, 31 L. Ed. 2d 408, 1972 U.S.
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire 315 U.S. 568, 62 S. Ct. 766, 86 L. Ed. 1031, 1942 U.S.
R.A.V. v. City of St. Paul, Minnesota 505 U.S. 377, 112 S. Ct. 2538, 120 L. Ed. 2d 305, 1992 U.S.
Citation. 249 U.S. 204, 39 S. Ct. 249, 63 L. Ed. 561, 1919 U.S.
Brief Fact Summary. The Petitioner, Frohwerk (Petitioner), was convicted of attempting to cause disloyalty, mutiny and refusal of duty in the military of the Respondent, the United States (Respondent).
Synopsis of Rule of Law. Speech that could incite the audience to react negatively to the war efforts may be restricted without violating the United States Constitution (Constitution).
Facts. The Petitioner published 12 articles in his own newspaper that denounced the war and military action. He was subsequently convicted of violating the Espionage Act of 1917.
Issue. Are Petitioner’s First Amendment constitutional rights violated by this conviction?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.