Source: http://www.issuewonk.com/reading.asp?ID=194&type=36&keyword=
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 10:34:54+00:00

Document:
What one needs to remember is that the Constitution isn’t about what the people can do, it’s about what the government can do. It spells out the powers given to the federal government and makes it clear that any powers not specifically granted do not exist. The Bill of Rights, which the original framers didn’t believe was necessary and which became a condition for many states’ ratification of the Constitution, was meant to spell out what the government can’t do.
This “evolution” has come through various federal judicial decisions, such as Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965), Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973), Bowers v. Hardwick, 478 U.S. 186 (1986) [overturned by Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U.S. 558 (2003)], Stanley v. Georgia, 394 U.S. 557 (1969), and Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U.S. 49 (1973).
15 U.S.C. § 45 charges the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) with enforcing privacy promises made in the marketplace.
The Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a) protects personal information held by the federal government by preventing unauthorized disclosures of such information.
The Fair Credit Report Act (15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.) protects personal financial information collected by consumer reporting agencies.
The Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (15 U.S.C. §§ 6501-6506) allows parents to control what information is collected online about their children younger than 13 years old.
1 Right of Privacy: An Overview. Cornell University Law School, Legal Information Institute.
2 Roe v. Wade Decision, Touro Law Center.
3 The Right of Privacy. Exploring Constitutional Conflicts. University of Missouri - Kansas City.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 45
 § 552
 § 1681
 v.