Source: http://ohiolawinfo.blogspot.com/2006_03_05_archive.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 10:50:25+00:00

Document:
2006-0386. State ex rel. Koncelik v. Hastings.
2006-0445. RX Bedford Investors, LLC v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd.
of Revision. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2002-R-2564.
2006-0448. RX Bedford Investors, LLC v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd.
of Revision. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2002-R-2509.
2006-0456. Charter Steel-Cleveland, Inc. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd.
of Revision. Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-V-538.
2000-1030. Ohio Hosp. Assn. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
this court upon the termination of the automatic stay under the Bankruptcy Code.
within 15 days of the date of this entry.
pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County.
transmitting the record is extended to March 28, 2006.
1998-0713. Disciplinary Counsel v. Atkin.
On January 13, 1999, this court permanently disbarred respondent, Sanford I.
It is ordered by this court that the motions are denied.
A story making its way around the blogosphere concerns a denial of a motion by a pro se litigant because it was "incomprehensible."
2003-0647. State v. Conway , 2006-Ohio-791.
Franklin C.P. No. 02CR-1153. Judgment affirmed.
2004-1594. M. Conley Co. v. Anderson , 2006-Ohio-792.
Stark App. No. 2003CA00386, 2004-Ohio-4216. Judgment affirmed.
Lundberg Stratton and O'Donnell, JJ., concur separately.
2005-1154. Muskingum Cty. Certified Grievance Commt. v. Greenberger, 2006-Ohio-790.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 03-105. Bruce L. Greenberger, Attorney Registration No. 0023820, is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for two years, with six months stayed on conditions.
the time for transmitting the record is extended to May 1, 2006.
1998-2661. Toledo Bar Assn. v. Hayes.
and respondent reinstated to the practice of law in Ohio.
2005-0818. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. Marosan.
Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, Nos.
As promised, here is the syllabus with links to HTML and PDF versions of the opinion.
In a case that may have some bearing on how business is done on some of Ohio's college campuses, the United States Supreme Court has come down on the side of the government in the case of federal monies and military recruiters. I don't have a link to the case yet, but just received word via a news alert. More will follow.
APPELLANT AND CROSSAPPELLEE; CITY OF RAVENNA, APPELLEE.
Fulton App. No. F-05-011 and F-05-004, 2005-Ohio-6245.
This cause is pending before this court as a discretionary appeal.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.