Source: https://www.retailpatentlitigation.com/2017/11/june-2017-retail-patent-litigation-report/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 20:15:59+00:00

Document:
While the TC Heartland venue decision came down in late May, June filings remained a bit slow, presumably as plaintiffs sorted out where to file and the implications of TC Heartland generally, as well as responded to numerous venue or transfer motions in light of TC Heartland. As with the late May, post-TC Heartland filings, East Texas filings stayed way down and the bulk of the non-Texas filings went to Delaware, as well as to a lesser degree California and Illinois district courts. Frequent filers included CryptoPeak Security, Express Mobile, Interface IP, Landmark Technology, Shipping & Transit, Uniloc, and VOIT Technologies.
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Google Inc. (E.D. Tex.; D. Del.; N.D. Cal.; C.D. Cal.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 7,535,890 (System and method for instant VoIP messaging); 8,995,433 (System and method for instant VoIP messaging); 6,324,578 (Methods, systems and computer program products for management of configurable application programs on a network); 6,510,466 (Methods, systems and computer program products for centralized management of application programs on a network); 7,069,293 (Methods, systems and computer program products for distribution of application programs to a target station on a network); 7,690,556 (Step counter accounting for incline); 8,872,646 (Method and system for waking up a device due to motion); 8,199,747 (System and method for instant VoIP messaging); 6,110,228 (Method and apparatus for software maintenance at remote nodes); and 6,728,766 (Methods, systems and computer program products for license use management on a network).
OEC Logistics, Inc. v. Shipping & Transit, LLC (N.D. Cal.).
Patents: 6,415,207 (System and method for automatically providing vehicle status information); 6,763,299 (Notification systems and methods with notifications based upon prior stop locations); 6,904,359 (Notification systems and methods with user-definable notifications based upon occurance of events); and 7,400,970 (System and method for an advance notification system for monitoring and reporting proximity of a vehicle).
W. Interactive Inc. v. Shipping & Transit, LLC (N.D. Cal.).
Patents: 6,317,060 (Base station system and method for monitoring travel of mobile vehicles and communicating notification messages); 6,415,207 (System and method for automatically providing vehicle status information); and 6,904,359 (Notification systems and methods with user-definable notifications based upon occurance of events).
Word to Info, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc. (D. Del.).
Plaintiff: Word to Info, Inc.
Patents: 5,715,468 (Memory system for storing and retrieving experience and knowledge with natural language); 6,138,087 (Memory system for storing and retrieving experience and knowledge with natural language utilizing state representation data, word sense numbers, function codes and/or directed graphs); 6,609,091 (Memory system for storing and retrieving experience and knowledge with natural language utilizing state representation data, word sense numbers, function codes and/or directed graphs); 7,349,840 (Memory system for storing and retrieving experience and knowledge with natural language utilizing state representation data, word sense numbers, function codes, directed graphs and/or context memory); 7,873,509 (Memory system for storing and retrieving experience and knowledge with natural language utilizing state representation data, word sense numbers, function codes, directed graphs, context memory, and/or purpose relations); 8,326,603 (Memory system for storing and retrieving experience and knowledge with natural language queries); and 8,688,436 (Memory system for storing and retrieving experience and knowledge by utilizing natural language responses).
Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. BB&T Corporation (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 7,917,285 (Device, system and method for remotely entering, storing and sharing addresses for a positional information device).
Express Mobile, Inc. v. Brainvire Infotech, Inc. (D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 6,546,397 (Browser based web site generation tool and run time engine); 7,594,168 (Browser based web site generation tool and run time engine); and 9,471,287 (Systems and methods for integrating widgets on mobile devices).
VOIT Technologies, LLC v. Branding Iron Western Store, Inc. d/b/a Safety Source Apparel (E.D. Tex.; W.D. Tex.; S.D. Fla.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 6,226,412 (Secure digital interactive system for unique product identification and sales).
CryptoPeak Security, LLC v. 1-800 Contacts, Inc. (D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 6,202,150 (Auto-escrowable and auto-certifiable cryptosystems).
Encoditech LLC v. Plantronics, Inc. (D. Del.; E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 6,321,095 (Wireless communications approach).
Interface IP Holdings LLC v. Ellie Mae, Inc. (D. Del.; S.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 7,296,221 (System and method for remote, automatic reporting and verification of forms); 7,406,663 (Graphical input device with dynamic field width adjustment for input of variable data via a browser-based display); and 7,500,201 (Data input method and system with multi-sub-field matching of user entries into a graphical input device).
Vaultet LLC v. Disney Store USA, LLC (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 7,814,009 (Anonymous on-line cash management system).
First-Class Monitoring, LLC v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. (E.D. Tex.).
Defendant: JP Morgan Chase & Co.
Patent: 6,014,089 (Method for transmitting data using a digital control channel of a wireless network).
Mirror Imaging LLC v. BOKF NA (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 6,963,866 (Method of obtaining an electronically stored financial document); 7,552,118 (Method of obtaining an electronically-stored financial document); 7,836,067 (Method of obtaining electronically-stored financial documents); and 9,141,612 (Method of obtaining an electronically-stored financial document).
Clean Energy Management Solutions, LLC v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (E.D. Tex.).
Patent: 8,035,479 (Mesh network door lock).
Landmark Technology, LLC v. Jones Soda Co. et al. (W.D. Wash.).
Jones Soda Co. (USA) Inc.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.