Source: http://www.stevenslc.com/results/
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 09:13:38+00:00

Document:
Principals at Stevens LC have served as lead or co-lead counsel in more than 100 complex multi-party matters recovering in excess of $900 million, including over $2 million for direct charitable donation.
(Co-lead class counsel) Jacqueline Ibarra, et al. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al, (USDC Central District Case No. 2:17-cv-04344-PA-AS). Obtained Summary Judgement on class wide liability and damages judgement on behalf of class of $97,284,817.91.
(Co-lead class counsel) Klotzer, et al. vs. International Windows, (Solano County Superior Court Case No. FCS 021196). Defective residential windows. $600 million benefit to the class. ($8.5 million fee award).
(Co-lead class counsel) Deist, et. al. vs. Viking Industries, (San Joaquin Sup. Crt, Case No. CV 025771). Defective residential windows. $210 million benefit to the class. ($5.6 million fee award).
(Co-lead class counsel) Grair v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc., (Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC288536). False and deceptive advertising of anti-depressant Paxil. $9.5 million benefit to the class, $1 million benefit to charity. ($3.35 million fee award).
(Co-lead class counsel) Oliver, et al. vs. Atmos Corporation (San Joaquin Superior Court, Case No. CV 0119362). Defective residential windows. $9.3 million benefit to the class. ($2.5 million fee award).
(Lead class counsel) Long v. Provide Commerce, Inc. (dba Pro Flowers), (Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC513925). Alleged false and deceptive advertising, nondislcosure of material term and condition. Secured injunctive and equitable relief.
(Lead class counsel) Wally vs. CCA Industries, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC422833). Alleged false and deceptive advertising of dietary supplement. $2.2 million benefit to class, $1 million benefit to charity.
(Lead class counsel) Abigana vs. Rylock (Alameda County, Case No. 2002 076625). Defective residential windows. ($2.1 million recovery).
(Lead class counsel) Smith vs. ABC Windows, (Superior Court for the State of California, Riverside County, Case No. CV025771).
(Lead class counsel) Pagano, et. al. vs. Weather Shield Manufacturing, Inc., (Contra Costa County Superior Court for the State of California, Case No. C0800609).
(Co-lead class counsel) Penos vs. Zell, et al. (Los Angeles County Superior Court). Alleged unlawful termination of employee benefits on behalf of hundreds of employees for lost benefits.
(Co-lead class counsel) Morales, et al vs. Kraft Foods Group, Inc., U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Western Division, Case No. 2:14-cv- 04387-JAK-PJW. Alleged false and deceptive advertising of consumer product.
(Lead class counsel) Butler vs. Rydell Enterprises (Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC389166). Wage and hour class action.
(Lead class counsel) Imburgia, et al vs. DirecTV Inc., Los Angeles County Superior Court, Case No. BC398295. Alleged unlawful early termination fee.
(Lead class counsel) Perez-Pirio, Et Al. vs. The Procter & Gamble Company (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC485201). Alleged false and deceptive advertising of consumer Anti-Aging Products.
(Lead class counsel) Imig, et al vs. Revision, Inc. (U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, Case Number 2:11-cv-03148). Alleged false and deceptive advertising of consumer product Nectifirm.
(Lead class counsel) Hawley, et al vs. Kao Brands Company, (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC420775). Alleged false and deceptive advertising of consumer product Jergens Natural Glow.
(Lead class counsel) Gomez, et al.vs.Wal-Mart Stores. (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC538639). Alleged false and deceptive advertising of consumer product Equate Sensitive Skin Unscented Body Wash.
(Lead class counsel) Martin, et al vs. Adidas, Inc., U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Western Division, Case No. 13-CV-00188 GAF(CWx). Alleged false and deceptive advertising.
(Co-lead Class Counsel) Atkins, et al vs. Obesity Research Institute LLC, (Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC407882). Alleged false and deceptive advertising of consumer product Lipozene.
(Lead Class Counsel) Wilkinson, Et Al. vs. Lil’ Drug Store Products, Inc., San Diego County Superior Court Case No. 37-2007-00074238. Alleged false and deceptive advertising of consumer product Legatrin.
Conrad v. Farmers. Recovered more than $2 million on behalf of an elder insured against her insurance company for bad faith insurance claims handling practices arising out of the Northridge Earthquake.
In Re Hemet Reservoir. Recovered more than $10 million on behalf of a group of individual homeowners against their insurance companies for damages to their homes arising out of a negligent public construction project.
Leavit, et. al. v. Ventura County Community College District Board. Represented Ventura County residents in taxpayer lawsuit seeking and accomplishing removal of several elected officials for misappropriation of public funds and violation of the Ralph M. Brown "Open Meeting" Act.
In Re: Chinese-Manufactured Drywall Products Liability Litigation(MDL 2047 - Honorable Eldon Fallon, United States District Court Eastern District Of Louisiana).
In Re: Actos Products Liability Litigation (California JCCP 4696 - Judge Kenneth R. Freeman Presiding)(MDL 2299 - United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana).
In Re: Incretin Mimetics Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2452 - Honorable Judge Anthony J. Battaglia, United States District Court, Southern District of California).
In Re: Mirena IUD Products Liability Litigation (MDL No. 2434 – Honorable Cathy Seibel in the United States District Court Southern District of New York.
In Re: Pradaxa (Dabigatran Etexilate) Products Liability Litigation(MDL 2385 - Honorable Daniel Stack, United States District Court, Southern District of Illinois).
In Re: American Medical Systems, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2325 - Honorable Joseph R. Goodwin, United States District Court, Southern District of West Virginia).
In Re: Boston Scientific Corp. Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2326 - Honorable Joseph R. Goodwin, U.S. District Court Southern District of West Virginia).
In Re: C.R. Bard, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation (MDL 2187 - Honorable Joseph R. Goodwin, U.S. District Court Southern District of West Virginia).
In Re: Ethicon, Inc., Pelvic Repair System Products Liability Litigation(MDL 2327 - Honorable Joseph R. Goodwin, U.S. District Court Southern District of West Virginia).
Imburgia v. DIRECTV, Inc., 2016 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3238, 2016 WL 2609764 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. May 4, 2016). Lead litigation and appellate counsel. Secured order of consideration of new issue followinig the United States Supreme Court's overturning prior order of the California Court of Appeal in DIRECTV, Inc. v. Imburgia, 136 S. Ct. 463 (U.S. 2015).
Long v. Provide Commerce, Inc., 245 Cal. App. 4th 855, (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2016). Prevailed in a matter of first impression regarding applicability of arbitration clause in browsewrap agreement and order confirmation e-mail.
Imburgia v. DIRECTV, Inc., 225 Cal.App.4th 338 (Apr. 7, 2014). Lead litigation and appellate counsel. Prevailed in determination of non-applicability of arbitration clause in consumer services contract. In affirming the lower court's decision, California Court of Appeal split from the Ninth Circuit's decision in Murphy v. DIRECTV, Inc.
Johnson v. GlaxoSmithKline, Inc., 166 Cal. App. 4th 1497 (2009) The second published decision to distinguish Alvarez v. May Dept. Stores Co. (2006) 143 Cal.App.4th 1223, and applied established principles of privity and collateral estoppel to class certification issues.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.