Source: http://aurora-group.eu/englpm/rubrics_852.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 04:26:08+00:00

Document:
Kabanov, P.A.. Public discussion of issues of fi ghting corruption as a form of interaction of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of public control implementation // Law and Politics. – 2014. – № 10. – P. 1515-1524. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2014.10.12998.
Review: The object of studies involves public discussion of the issues of fighting corruption as the form of interaction of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of implementation of public control. The goals of the study involve the following: 1) discussing elements of public discussion on fighting corruption as the form of interaction of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of public control implementation; 2) providing structural analysis of the main elements of the public discussions of the issues regarding fighting corruption as a form of interaction of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of public control implementation; 2) to offer the vision of the author regarding public discussions on issues regarding fighting corruption as a form of interaction of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of public control implementation. The methodological basis for the study involves dialectic materialism and the general scientific cognition methods based upon it, including structural analysis, etc. The scientific novelty of the study is due to the fact that for the first time in the Russian scientific literature the author views the public discussion of issues of fighting corruption as a form of interaction of the civil society institutions with the public government bodies in the process of public control implementation, discussing its contents, providing its scientific definition, which may be used for the further scientific studies.
Keywords: corruption, fighting corruption, anti-corruption policy, public discussion, public control, public government bodies, civil society institutions, interaction, public discussions, public hearings.
Contact information: Kabanov , Pavel Aleksandrovich, 423812, Russia, Tatarstan, Naberezhnye Chelny, ul. Raisa Belyaeva, 31, of. 81.
Kharitonov A.N. Retsenziya na knigu: N.A. Kolomyttsev, O.N. Kolomyttseva Sovremennye problemy obshchestvennogo kontrolya v Rossii: monografiya. – SPb.: Izdatel'stvo Yuridicheskogo instituta (Sankt-Peterburg). 2014. – 220 s. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2014.-7.-C. 696-699. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2807.2014.7.12076.
Astanin V.V. Ob effektivnykh mekhanizmakh vzaimodeystviya gosudarstva s grazhdanskim obshchestvom v sfere protivodeystviya korruptsii. // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo.-2011.-4.-C. 5-8.
Khokhlova E.A. Obshchestvennoe obsuzhdenie zakonoproektov i vazhneyshikh voprosov gosudarstvennoy i/ili obshchestvennoy zhizni: konstitutsionno-pravovoe regulirovanie // Konstitutsionnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2013. – №4. – S.47-59.
Sivitskiy V.A. Obshchestvennye obsuzhdeniya zakonoproektov: demokratiya ili gosudarstvennyy ratsionalizm // Yuridicheskaya tekhnika. – 2014. – №8. – S.393-396.
Poroshin S.A. Korruptsiya v sisteme gosudarstvennykh zakupok: problemy i puti vykhoda // Voprosy upravleniya. – 2013. – №2 (4). – S.051-057.
Okolesnova O.A. Informatsionno-pravovye aspekty obshchestvennykh obsuzhdeniy kak formy obshchestvennogo kontrolya // European Social Science Journal. – 2012. – №11-1 (27). – S.537-549.
O deyatel'nosti Obshchestvennoy palaty Respubliki Dagestan i sostoyanii grazhdanskogo obshchestva v Respublike Dagestan: Doklad predsedatelya Obshchestvennoy palaty Respubliki Dagestan A.M. Murtazalieva. – Makhachkala, 2008. – S.5, 12.
Lipchinskaya M.A. Ob obshchestvennom obsuzhdenii zakonoproektov kak forma uchastiya grazhdan Rossiyskoy Federatsii v upravlenii delami gosudarstva // Pravovaya politika i pravovaya zhizn'. – 2011. – №2. – S.12-18.
Leonov Yu.S. Ob obshchestvennom obsuzhdenii strategii gosudarstvennoy natsional'noy politiki Rossiyskoy Federatsii // Sovremennye issledovaniya sotsial'nykh problem. – 2013. – №1 (21).
Zakharov A.K. Obshchestvennoe obsuzhdenie i protsedura prinyatiya i vneseniya izmeneniy v ustav gorodskogo okruga // Yurist'-Pravoved'. – 2011. – №5 (148). – S.98-100.
Akhmetova S.A. Obshchestvennoe obsuzhdenie «Innovatsionnaya politika v Khabarovskom krae» // Uchenye zapiski Komsomol'skogo-na-Amure gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta. – 2014. – T.1. – №2. – S.117-118.
Gaynutdinova G.Kh., Mingazova N.M. Razlichiya v protsedurakh obshchestvennykh slushaniy i obshchestvennykh slushaniy // Ekologicheskiy konsalting. – 2012. – №2. – S.15-21.
Kabanov P.A.. Prezidium Soveta pri Prezidente Rossiyskoy Federatsii i obrazovannye im rabochie gruppy i komissiya kak federal'nye spetsializirovannye antikorruptsionnye organy: pravovoe regulirovanie i voprosy povysheniya effektivnosti ikh deyatel'nosti // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 11. – S. 104-107.
Kabanov P.A.. Protsedurnye voprosy oznakomleniya s materialami, postupivshimi na rassmotrenie Komissii po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu gosudarstvennykh (munitsipal'nykh) sluzhashchikh i uregulirovaniyu konflikta interesov // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 10. – S. 104-107.
Kabanov P.A., Garipov I.M.. Viktimologicheskaya kharakteristika «gosudarstvennoy korruptsii» v Respublike Tatarstan // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 9. – S. 104-107.
Kabanov P.A.. Protsessual'nye osnovaniya i poryadok otmeny obyazatel'nykh resheniy, prinimaemykh Komissiyami po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh (munitsipal'nykh) sluzhashchikh i uregulirovaniyu konflikta interesov // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 7. – S. 104-107.
Kabanov P.A.. Prokurorskiy nadzor za formirovaniem i deyatel'nost'yu Komissiey po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu gosudarstvennykh (munitsipal'nykh) sluzhashchikh i uregulirovaniyu konflikta interesov // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 6. – S. 104-107.
Kabanov P.A.. O trebovaniyakh k chlenam Komissiy po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu gosudarstvennykh grazhdanskikh sluzhashchikh i uregulirovaniyu konflikta interesov ne zanimayushchim dolzhnosti gosudarstvennoy sluzhby // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
Kabanov P.A.. Osnovaniya i poryadok vyvoda chlenov Komissiy po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu gosudarstvennykh (munitsipal'nykh) sluzhashchikh i uregulirovaniyu konflikta interesov iz ikh sostava // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
Kabanov P.A.. Prekrashchenie proizvodstva po materialam, postupayushchim na rassmotrenie Komissiy po soblyudeniyu trebovaniy k sluzhebnomu povedeniyu gosudarstvennykh (munitsipal'nykh) sluzhashchikh i ureguli-rovaniyu konflikta interesov: osnovaniya i poryadok // Administrativnoe i munitsipal'noe pravo. – 2012. – № 1. – S. 104-107.
Panfilov, A.N.. On the issue of number and condition of the objects of cultural heritage in the modern Russia // Law and Politics. – 2010. – № 8.
Menshenina, N.N.. Social opinion on corruption in Vladivostok // Law and Politics. – 2010. – № 8.
A. P. Fokov. Tapping of Telephone Conversations in the US Criminal Procedure and Constitution Rights of Citizens. // Law and Politics. – 2000. – № 9.
O. V. Berg. On the Conception of State Policy in the Sphere of Local Self-government and Federal Program of State Support of Municipal Formations. // Law and Politics. – 2000. – № 9.
S. A. Burjanov. Sacralization of Power by Violating Human Rights and Freedoms Threatens the Russian Constitution System. // Law and Politics. – 2000. – № 9.
E. I. Panfilova. Security of documents information resources turnover. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 8.
Ju. A. Dmitriev. Remarks on Federal Law draft "on the Russian Federation citizenship". // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 8.
V. E. Berezko. State and Civil Society - Mutual Cooperation should be Effective. // Law and Politics. – 2000. – № 7.
V. V. Burtsev. Parliamentarism and Constitutional Monarchy; Mechanisms of Public Control. // Law and Politics. – 2000. – № 7.
S. A. Burianov. Certain Unanalyzed Extremism in Chechnya and Dagestan as Crime Factor. // Law and Politics. – 2000. – № 7.
I. N. Ivshina. Constitutional law estimate of Law of Kirov region "On bringing in changes and additions in the Charter (Main Law) of Kirov region", dated 29 November 2000. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 6.
Yu. A. Dmitriev. Is it possible to secure human rights after dearth? // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 6.
S. A. Buriyanov, S. A. Mozgovoi. The conception of state-confessional relations: from declaration of freedom of conscience towards anti-constitutional state policy of religion (denomination) preference. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 6.
Yu. Yu. Kovyazina. Legal aspects of creation and functioning of the zone of preferential taxation in the Republic of Kalmykia. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 5.
M. I. Pastukhov. What Parliament in Byelorussia is "right"? // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 5.
A. A. Vlasov, M. G. Vlasova. Is the Court the Subject of the Proof in the Russian Court Procedure? // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 4.
J. A. Dmitriev. Shall We Have Civilized Party System in Russia? // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 4.
V. N. Lopatin. Problems of Legal and Administrative Protection and Defense of Intellectual Property. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 3.
E. D. Shelkovnikova. Weapons as integral part of cultural legacies of a state and problems of its status of laws. // Law and Politics. – 2000. – № 3.
U. A. Dmitriev. Some defects of constitutional regulations. The presidential election in the republic of Sakha (Yakutia). // Law and Politics. – 2002. – № 2.
A. K. Zharova. Law and formation of the informational society in the republic of Uzbekistan. // Law and Politics. – 2002. – № 2.
A. P. Fokov. Peculiarities of the Ombudsman Institution in the USA. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 2.
S. A. Bogolubov. Why don't we need the law about the opposition to the political extremism. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 12.
T. K. Vahitov. The former procedure of arrest and detention must be canceled. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 12.
S. B. Beisebaeva. Ways of legal education. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 12.
O. V. Berg. On Application of Separation of Powers Principle in Local Self-government. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 1.
S. Ju. Fedorjuk. Objective Side of the Crimes, Connected with Illegal Turnover of Drugs and Psychotropic Substances: Lacunes in Legislation. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 11.
S. A. Ishenko. Reformation of legal status of the nongovernmental organizations in the international sport movement. // Law and Politics. – 2001. – № 10.
A. P. Fokov,V. V. Luzin.. Semi-Presidential Model of Division of Power (the Example of France). Parliamentary Model of the Division of Powers (the Example of Great Britain). // Law and Politics. – 2000. – № 10.

References: V. 

V. 

V. 

V. 
 V. 
 V.