Source: http://fantrap.com/IL_Zxjs_Show.aspx?News_PI=5298
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 17:55:40+00:00

Document:
Thomas D.Rowe,Jr.et.al.,Civil Procedure,3rd ed., Foundation Press 2012, pp18-19.
 F. Duffy, The Festo Decision and the Return of the Supreme Court to the Bar of Patents, 2002 Sup. Ct. Rev. 273, 278.
Mark D. Janis, Patent Law in the Age of the Invisible Supreme Court, 2001 U. Ill. L. Rev. 387.
Peter Lee, Patent Law and the Two Cultures, 120 Yale L. J. 2, 43.
Peter Lee, Patent Law and the Two Cultures, 120 Yale L. J. 2, 42.
Matthew Sag, Tonja Jacobi and Maxim Sytch, Ideology and Exceptionalism in Intellectual Property: An Empirical Study, 97 Cal. L. Rev. 801, 852.
David J. Kappos, October Term 2012: Trends in Supreme Court Intellectual Property Jurisprudence, www.cravath.com.
 Bilski v. Kappos, 561 U. S. 593 (2010).
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. (2013).
Mayo Collaborative Services v. Prometheus Laboratories, Inc., 566 U.S. (2012).
regards as the invention”. 35 U.S.C §112(b).
Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kogyo Kabushiki Co., 535 U.S. 722, 732 (2002).
Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co., 185 U.S. 403, 437 (1902).
Markman v. Westview Instruments, Inc., 517 U.S. 370, 373 (1996).
United Carbon Co. v. Binney & Smith Co., 317 U.S. 228, 236 (1942).
Minerals Separation, Ltd. v. Hyde, 242 U.S. 261, 270 (1916).
Warner-Jenkinson Co.v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co., 520 U.S. 17, 40 (1997).
532 F. 3d 1318 (2008).
Aro Mfg. Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co., 365 U.S. 336, 341.
Deepsouth Packing Co. v. Laitram Corp., 406 U.S. 518, 526-527 (1972).
“the court in exceptional cases may award reasonable attorney fees to the prevailing party”, 35 U.S.C §285.
Brooks Furniture Mfg., Inc. v. Dutailier Int’l, Inc., 393 F. 3d 1378 (2005).
Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society, 421 U.S. 240, 258-259 (1975).
695 F. 3d 1266, 1272 (2012).
Agawam Co. v. Jordan, 7 Wall. 583, 609 (1869).
Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U. S. 227, 240 (1937).
Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. Westover, 359 U. S. 500, 509 (1959).
Raleigh v. Illinois Dept. of Revenue, 530 U. S. 15, 20-21 (2000).
Fortnightly Corp. v. United Artists Television Inc., 392 U.S. 390 (1968).
Chirco v. Crosswinds Communities, Inc., 474 F. 3d 227, 236 (CA6, 2007).
New Era Publications Int’l v. Henry Holt & Co., 873 F. 2d 576, 584-585 (CA2, 1989).
Associated Gen. Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519 (1983).
Associated Gen. Contractors of Cal., Inc. v. Carpenters, 459 U.S. 519, 529, 532 (1983).
Steel Co. v. Citizens for Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83, 97 (1998).
Allen v. Wright, 468 U.S. 737, 751 (1984).
Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154, 163 (1997).
Neal K. Katyal,“The Supreme Court’s Powerful New Consensus”, New York Times (June 26, 2014), available at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/27/opinion/the-supreme-courts-powerful-new-consensus.html?_r=0.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 §112
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 §285
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.