Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Particular-relations-a-Landlord-and-tenant-Part-6.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 22:22:51+00:00

Document:
Cal. 675, 34 Pac. 120; Carmody v. Chicago & A. R. Co., Ill 111. 69; Big Sandy Co. v. Ramey, 162 Ky. 236, 172 S. W. 508; Melvin v. Proprietors of Locks & Canals on Merrimack River, 5 Mete. (Mass.) 15, 38 Am. Dec. 384; Case v. Green, 53 Mich. 615, 19 N. W. 554; Mattison v. Ausmuss, 50 Mo. 551; Nowlin v. Adams, 25 Gratt (Va.) 137; Parkersburg Nat. Bank v. Neal, 28 W. Va. 744.
22. Lewis v. Hawkins, 23 Wall 119; Sample v. Reeder, 107 Ala. 227, 18 So. 214; Perry v. Arka-delphia Lumber Co., 83 Ark. 374, 103 S. W. 724; Woodward v. Hennegan, 128 Cal. 293, 60 Pac. 769; Spratt v. Livingston, 32 Fla. 507, 22 L. R. A."453; Moore v. Mobley, 123 Ga. 424, 51 S. E. 351; Peabody v. Hewett, 52 Me. 33, 83 Am. Dec. 486; Brown v. King, 5 Mete. (Mass.) 173; Burke v. Douglass, 115 Mich. 197, 73 N. W. 133; Moring v. Abies, 62 Miss. 263, 52 Am. Rep. 186; In re Department of Public Parks, 73 N. Y. 560; Worth v. Wrenn, 144 N. C. 656, 57 S. E. 388; West v. Edwards, 41 Ore. 609, 69 Pac. 992; Moore v. Kelly, 57 Okla. 348, 157 Pac. 81; Mcculloch v.
Nicholson, - Tex. Civ. App - , 162 S. W. 432; William James Sons Co. v. Hutchinson, 79 W. Va. 389, 90 S. E. 1047. The possession of the vendee has been regarded as becoming adverse in case the vendor repudiates the contract, as by conveying to another person. Pearson v. Boyd, 62 Tex. 541.
43 Vt. 592; Furlong v. Garrett.
44 Wis. 1ll; See Endicott v. Haviland, 220 Mass. 48, 107 N. E. 394.
24. Zeller v. Eckert, 4 How. 295 Sample v. Reeder, 107 Ala 227, 18 So. 214; Pope v. Brassit is not entirely clear why the performance of the vendee's part of the contract should be regarded as ipso facto giving to his possession an adverse character, but it is perhaps based on the view that the vendee is then entitled to possession,25 and that consequently, while previously his possession could be explained only on the theory that he was the tenant of the vendor,26 such tenancy might be regarded as automatically ended by reason of complete performance of the contract by him. There are decisions, however, that even in the case of such complete performance by the vendee, a repudiation of the vendor's title is necessary to start the running of the statute.27 And in support of this view it may be suggested that, whatever change in the relations of the parties may be made by the vendee's performance, in the view of a court of equity, it does not change their relations at law.
Where the vendee under an executory contract of sale transfers his interest to another, who takes possession, the possession of the latter is ordinarily, like-that of the original vendee, not adverse to the vendor,28 provided at least he has notice that his vendor, the field, 110 Ky. 128, 61 S. W. 461: Burke v. Douglass, 115 Mich. 197, 73 N. W. 133; Lanham v. Bowlby, 86 Neb. 148, 125 N. W. 149; Cook v. Knott, 28 Tex. 85; Chapman v. Chapman, 91 Va. 397, 50 Am. St. Rep. 846, 21 S. E. 813.
25. See cases cited, 19 Am. & Eng. Encyc. Law (2d Ed.) 704; 39 Cyclopedia Law & Proc. 1621.
26. See 1 Tiffany, Landl'd & Ten. Sec. 43a.
27. Pope v. Brassfield, 110 Ky. 128, 61 S. W. 5; Roxbury v. Hutson, 37 Me. 42 (Seville); Rodgers v. Beckel, 172 Mich. 544, 138 N. W. 202 (semble); Chapman v. Chapman, 91 Va. 397, 50 Am. St. Rep. 846, 21 S. E. 813; Core v. Faupel, 24 W. Va. 238.
In Briggs v. Prosser, 14 Wend. 227, whether the possession after performance is adverse, was regarded as a question to be d< mined with reference to the facts.
28. Lewis v. Hawkins, 23 Wall. 119; Hannibal, etc., R. Co. v. Miller, 115 Mo. 15S. 21 S. W. 915; Jackson v. Bard, 4 Johns. (N. Y.) 230, 4 Am. Dec. 267; Gillison v. Savannah, etc.. R. Co., 7 S. C. 173. Compare iluntrr v. Parsons, 2 Bailey (S. C.) 59.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.