Source: https://law.jrank.org/pages/13599/Glidden-Company-v-Zdanok-et-al.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 08:07:10+00:00

Document:
That the original ruling against Durkee was improperly constituted because a U.S. Court of Claims judge, rather than a Circuit Court judge, had sat on the court when it heard the case.
That the U.S. Court of Claims judge had been entitled to sit on the circuit court case; the Court refused to consider any other aspect of the case, letting stand the circuit court judgment that workers from a closed-down plant did indeed have seniority rights at the next new plant that the company opened.
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee, 14 U.S. 304 (1816).
Colegrove v. Green, 328 U.S. 549 (1946).
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962).
Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465 (1976).
Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S. 1032 (1987).
Felker v. Turpin, 518 U.S. 1051 (1996).
"Agency Shop Ban Is Left Standing." New York Times, October 10, 1961, p. 85.
"High Court Bars Review of Case on Job Seniority."New York Times, October 9, 1962, p. 30.
et al. Glidden Company v. Zdanok - What Protection Does A Judge Need?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.