Source: https://es.scribd.com/document/234577851/Uniloc-et-al-v-Medhost
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 00:54:33+00:00

Document:
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 6:14-cv-00630: Uniloc USA, Inc. et. al. v. Medhost, Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-laJZ for more info.
Quality Experience Testing v. Epitiro Et. Al.
Bluestone Innovations v. LG Electronics et. al.
Kreyenborg v. PSI-Polymer Systems et. al.
Fellowes v. Intelli-Zone et. al.
Gametek v. 6Waves et. al.
of business at Legacy Town Center I, Suite 380, 7160 Dallas Parkway, Plano, Texas 75024.
Uniloc USA also maintains a place of business at 102 N. College, Ste. 806, Tyler, Texas 75702.
2540, Luxembourg (R.C.S. Luxembourg B159161).
3. Uniloc Luxembourg and Uniloc USA are collectively referred to as Uniloc.
property rights management, and critical infrastructure security.
MEDHOST does business in the State of Texas and in the Eastern District of Texas.
subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331, 1338(a), and 1367.
places of business in this judicial district.
substantial revenue from goods sold and services provided to Texas residents.
8. Uniloc incorporates paragraphs 1 through 7 herein by reference.
FLOWSHEET. A true and correct copy of the 526 patent is attached as Exhibit A.
to enforce, sue and recover damages for past and future infringements.
Title 35 of the United States Code.
Medhost Emergency Department Information System (EDIS).
claims of the 526 Patent.
15. On information and belief, to the extent any marking was required by 35 U.S.C.
with interest and costs as fixed by this Court under 35 U.S.C. 284.
therewith from infringing the 526 patent, Uniloc will be greatly and irreparably harmed.
18. Uniloc incorporates paragraphs 1 through 7 herein by reference.
MEDICAL DATA. A true and correct copy of the 451 patent is attached as Exhibit B.
occur by activities performed by parties that may have operated Defendants infringing products.
claims of the 451 Patent.
25. On information and belief, to the extent any marking was required by 35 U.S.C.
therewith from infringing the 451 patent, Uniloc will be greatly and irreparably harmed.
and proper under the circumstances.
Super Resolution Technologies v. Nikon Et. Al.
Senju Pharmaceutical et. al. v. Metrics et. al.
VIA Technologies et. al. v. ASUS Computer International et. al.
GRQ Investment Management v. Financial Engines et. al.
Sun Zapper v. Devroy et. al.
ATEN International v. Uniclass Technology et. al.
TracBeam v. T-Mobile et. al.
Dok Solution v. FKA Distributung et. al.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.