Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Chapter-XX-Transfer-By-Will.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 20:58:38+00:00

Document:
The revocation of a will.
Children or issue omitted from will.
1. 2 Pollock & Maitland, Hist. Eng. Law, 324-329.
(5th Ed.) 64; Williams, Real Prop. (21st Ed.) 168. See ante, Sec. 96.
3. 32 Hen. VIII. c. 1 (A. D. 1540).
5. Digby, Hist. Real Prop. c. 8.
6. Pollock & Maitland, Hist. Eng. Law, 313; Williams, Real Prop. (21st Ed.) 250.
7. Harwood v. Goodrlght, 1 Cowp. 87; Brydges v. Chandos. 2 Ves. Jr. 417, 427; Williams, Real Prop. 250.
9. 7 Wm. IV. and 1 Vict. c. 2C Sec.Sec. 3, 24 (A. D. 1837).
The king's courts, in the twelfth century, having established the principle that there could be no testamen10. 1 Jarman, Wills, 291, 612.
11. 1 Stimson's Am. St. Law, Sec.Sec. 2806, 2809.
12. See Webb v. Arcbibald, 128 Mo. 299, 34 S. W. 54; Jacobs' Estate, 140 Pa. St. 268, 11 L. R. A. 767, 23 Am. St. Rep. 230, 21 Atl. 318.
13. 1 Stimson's Am. St. Law, Sec. 2809 (C.). See Church v. Warren Mfg. Co., 14 R. I. 539; Briggs v.
Briggs, 69 Iowa, 617, 29 N. W. 632; Paine v. Forsaith, 84 Me. 66, 24 Atl. 590; Woman's Union Missionary Soc. of America v. Mead. 131 111. 33, 23 N. E. 603; Kimball v. Ellison, 128 Mass. 41.
14. See post, Sec. 474.
15. 2 Woerner, Administration, Sec. 337; 11 Am. & Eng. Enc. Law (2d Ed.) 1037 et seq.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.