Source: http://www.legalgist.com/what-happened-in-swift-co-v-u-s
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 06:43:09+00:00

Document:
Q: What happened in Swift & Co. v. U.S.?
i. Activity can be regulated under commerce power not because it had an effect on commercie – but rather – because the activity itself could be viewed as being part of a “current” of commerce.
ii. Holmes-When cattle are sent for sale from a place in one State w/ expectation that they will end up in another and when this is a continuing business – this is part of commerce.
iii. In Stafford (1908), Court says that the Court should defer to Congress as to connection between local acts and interstate commerce.
What's Your Answer to "What happened in Swift & Co. v. U.S.?"
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Constitutional Law and are similar to What happened in Swift & Co. v. U.S.?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What was the holding in the Hammer v. Dagenhart.16 (Child labor case) (1918) ?
Give a brief overview of the Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) case.
What was the issue in the Perez v. US (1971) (Consumer Credit Protection Act – loansharking case)?
What do you mean by Dormant Commerce Clause?
What was the holding in the Cooley v. Board of Wardens case?
What happened in Champion v. Ames?
What happened in the case Gibbons v. Ogden?
What was the rule in Baldwin v. GAF Seelig case?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.