Source: https://materialstechnology.asmedigitalcollection.asme.org/article.aspx?articleid=1427017
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 06:22:36+00:00

Document:
Nicholas, T., 1999, “Critical Issues in High Cycle Fatigue,” Int. J. Fatigue, 21, pp. S221–S231.
Jin, O., and Mall, S., 2002, “Effect of Independent Pad Displacement on Fretting Fatigue Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V,” Wear, 253, pp. 585–596.
Jin, O., and Mall, S., 2002, “Influence of Contact Configuration on Fretting Fatigue Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Under Independent Pad Displacement Condition,” Int. J. Fatigue, 24, pp. 1243–1253.
Namjoshi, S., Mall, S., Jain, V. K., and Jin, O., 2002, “Fretting Fatigue Crack Initiation Mechanisms in Ti-6Al-4V,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 25, pp. 955–964.
Lykins, C. D., Mall, S., and Jain, V. K., 2001, “Combined Experimental-Numerical Investigation of Fatigue Crack Initiation,” Int. J. Fatigue, 23(8), pp. 703–711.
Szolwinski, M., and Farris, T., 1996, “Mechanics of Fretting Fatigue Crack Formation,” Wear, 198, pp. 93–107.
Anton, D. L., Lutian, M. J., Favrow, L. H., Logan, D., and Annigeri, B. S., 2000, “The Effects of Contact Stress and Slip Distance on Fretting Fatigue Damage,” in Fretting Fatigue: Current Technology and Practices, D. W. Hoeppner, V. Chandrasekran, and C. B. Elliott, eds., ASTM STP 1367, American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp. 119–140.
Matikas, T. E., and Nicolaou, P. D., 2001, “Development of a Model for the Prediction of the Fretting Fatigue Regimes,” J. Mater. Res., 16(9), pp. 2716–2723.
Iyer, K., and Mall, S., 2001, “Analyses of Contact Pressure and Stress Amplitude Effects on Fretting Fatigue Life,” J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 123, pp. 85–93.
Venkatesh, T. A., Conner, B. P., Lee, C. S., Giannakopoulos, A. E., Lindley, T. C., and Suresh, S., 2001, “An Experimental Investigation of Fretting Fatigue in Ti-6Al-4V: the Role of Contact Conditions and Microstructure,” Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 32, pp. 1131–1146.
Lykins, C. D., Mall, S., and Jain, V. K., 2001, “A Shear Based Parameter for Fretting Fatigue Crack Initiation,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 24, pp. 461–473.
Cortez, R., Mall, S., and Calcaterra, J. R., 2000, “Interaction of High Cycle and Low Cycle Fatigue on Fretting Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V,” in Fretting Fatigue: Current Technologies and Practices, ASTM STP 1367, D. W. Hoeppner, V. Chandrasekaran, and C. B. Elliot, eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp. 183–198.
Iyer, K., and Mall, S., 2000, “Effects of Cyclic Frequency and Contact Pressure on Fretting Fatigue Under Two-level Block Loading,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 23, pp. 335–346.
Namjoshi, S., and Mall, S., 2001, “Fretting Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V Under Combined High Cycle and Low Cycle Fatigue Loading,” Int. J. Fatigue, 23, pp. S455–S461.
Richart, F. E., and Newmark, N. W., 1948, “An Hypothesis for the Determination of Cumulative Damage in Fatigue,” Proc. Am. Soc. Test. Mater.,48, pp. 767–800.
Marco, S. M., and Strakey, W. L., 1954, “A Concept of Fatigue Damage,” Trans. ASME, 76, pp. 627–632.
Manson, S. S., and Halford, G. R., 1981, “Practical Implementation of the Double Linear Damage Rule and Damage Curve Approach for Treating Cumulative Fatigue Damage,” Int. J. Fatigue, 17, pp. 169–192.
Manson, S. S., and Halford, G. R., 1986, “Re-examination of Cumulative Fatigue Damage Analysis-An Engineering Perspective,” Eng. Fract. Mech., 25, pp. 539–571.
Halford, G. R., 1997, “Cumulative Fatigue Damage Modeling-Crack Nucleation and Early Growth,” Int. J. Fatigue, 19, pp. S253–S260.
Walker, K., 1970, “The Effective Stress Ratio During Crack Propagation and Fatigue for 2024-T3 and 7075-T6 Aluminum,” in Effects on Environment and Complex Load History on Fatigue Life, ASTM STP 462, American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, PA., pp. 1–14.
Mutoh, Y., Tanaka, K., and Kondoh, M., 1989, “Fretting Fatigue in SUP9 Spring Steel Under Random Loading,” JSME Int. J., Ser. I, 32, pp. 274–281.
Kinyon, S. E., and Hoeppner, D. W., 2000, “Spectrum Loading Effects on the Fretting Behavior of Ti-6Al-4V,” in Fretting Fatigue: Current Technologies and Practices, ASTM STP 1367, D. W. Hoeppner, V. Chandrasekaran, and C. B. Elliot, eds., American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, pp. 100–115.
Comparison of S-N curve between constant and variable amplitude loading at (a) P=1334 N; and (b) P=3567 N.
Fracture surface of specimens subject to Hi-Lo loading after (a) n1=47,300 cycles; and (b) n1=62,000 cycles.
Fractured surface of specimen exposed to a repeated two-level loading n1=3000 and n2=3000 cycles. (a) overall fractured surface. Arrows indicate crack initiation sites, and o and x shows inside band and between bands; (b) region inside band; and (c) region between two bands.
Schematic drawing of (a) specimen; and (b) pad.
Schematic drawing of various two-level block loading profiles for (a) Hi-Lo loading; (b) Lo-Hi loading; and (c) repeated block loading.
Jin OO, Lee HH, Mall SS. Investigation Into Cumulative Damage Rules to Predict Fretting Fatigue Life of Ti-6Al-4V Under Two-Level Block Loading Condition. ASME. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2003;125(3):315-323. doi:10.1115/1.1590998.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.