Source: http://cal-span.org/unipage/?site=cal-span&owner=CARB&date=2014-10-23&mode=large
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 04:19:05+00:00

Document:
The following items on the consent calendar will be presented to the Board immediately after the start of the public meeting, unless removed from the consent calendar either upon a Board member's request or if someone in the audience wishes to speak on it. Attached are the Proposed Resolutions the Board will consider for consent items listed below.
Staff will present to the Board an update on on-going work related to the Advanced Clean Cars mid-term review, including updates on work with Federal agencies, research contracts related to consumers, and the feasibility of particulate matter measurement.
Staff will present to the Board amendments to California’s Low Emission Vehicle III (LEV III) regulations to control criteria pollutant emissions from new light- and medium-duty vehicles in order to ensure that emission reductions from the LEV III program are achieved while allowing vehicle manufacturers to continue to demonstrate compliance with both California and Federal regulations by using closely aligned test procedures. Staff will also propose modifications to the hybrid electric vehicle test procedures to facilitate the testing of today’s commercially available vehicles. Finally, staff will present a number of conforming and editorial modifications to the non-methane organic gas test procedures, heavy-duty Otto-cycle test procedures, heavy-duty diesel test procedures, and Environmental Performance Label specifications.
Staff will present to the Board an informational item describing the Zero Emission Showcase that will be taking place concurrently outside the Board Hearing room. Staff will provide context for the Showcase as well as a brief description of the vehicles that will be on display.
Staff will present to the Board a status report on plug in vehicle infrastructure in California.
Staff will present to the Board amendments to the Zero Emission Vehicle (ZEV) Regulation primarily focused on requirements for intermediate volume manufacturers. Prior to the introduction of this item, several Section 177 ZEV state representatives will be providing short presentations to the Board on the first year of implementation of the Multi-State ZEV Memorandum of Understanding in their respective states.
Staff will present to the Board minor updates to the 1997 8-hour ozone State Implementation Plans (SIP) for Coachella Valley and Western Mojave Desert Ozone Nonattainment Areas. These updates incorporate revised emissions inventories that account for the implementation of recently adopted rules and regulations, the effects of the recession, and updated transportation activity. The updates will be submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency for the approval of the plans as revisions to the California SIP.
Staff will present to the Board the supplemental document showing that all of the elements in the existing 2012 San Joaquin Valley 24-hour PM2.5 State Implementation Plan (SIP) meet the requirements under the Subpart 4 provisions of the federal Clean Air Act. The document also includes the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District request for a serious classification consistent with the attainment demonstration in the SIP. The updated information will be submitted to the United States Environmental Protection Agency for approval of the plan as a revision to the California SIP.
Staff will provide an informational update to the Board on current efforts and future plans to reduce oxides of nitrogen (NOx) and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from on-road heavy-duty vehicles. The update will include plans for strengthening the current NOx certification standards, including addressing off-cycle emissions, improving engine durability, and addressing emissions from high emitters with malfunctioning aftertreatment systems. Staff will also discuss developing future lower NOx standards, as well as current work to develop proposed federal Phase 2 heavy-duty vehicle GHG standards in cooperation with the United States Environmental Protection Agency and the Nationa Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
update the targets every eight years, or every four years based on changes in factors such as vehicle emission standards, fuel composition, or other measures that are anticipated to reduce GHG emissions from the transportation sector. The staff presentation will focus on the policy, technical, and timing considerations in updating the SB 375 targets. Staff will seek direction from the Board on a preferred approach for a target update process.
POET, LLC, et al. v. Corey, et al., Superior Court of California (Fresno County), Case No. 09CECG04850; plaintiffs’ appeal, California Court of Appeal, Fifth District, Case No. F064045; California Supreme Court, Case No. S213394.
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al. v. Corey, U.S. District Court (E.D. Cal. Fresno), Case No. 1:09−CV−02234−LJO−DLB; interlocutory appeal, U.S. Court of Appeal, Ninth Circuit Nos. 09-CV-02234.
Engine Manufacturers Association v. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2010-00082774; defendant’s appeal, California Court of Appeal, Third District, Case No. C071891.
Citizens Climate Lobby and Our Children’s Earth Foundation v. California Air Resources Board, San Francisco Superior Court, Case No. CGC-12-519554, plaintiffs’ appeal, California Court of Appeal, First District, No. A138830.
California Chamber of Commerce et al. v. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento Superior Court, Case 34-2012-80001313; plaintiffs’ appeal, California Court of Appeal, Third District, Case No. C075930.
Morning Star Packing Company, et al. v. California Air Resources Board, et al., Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2013-800001464; plaintiffs’ appeal, California Court of Appeal, Third District, Case No. C075954.
Delta Construction Company, et al., v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Case No. 11-1428.
City of Los Angeles through Department of Water and Power v. California Air Resources Board, et al., Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BS140620 (transferred to Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2013-80001451-CU-WM-GDS).
Alliance for California Business v. Nichols et al., Glenn County Superior Court, Case No. 13CV01232.
Dalton Trucking, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Court of Appeals, Direct of Columbia Circuit, Case No. 13-1283.
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc. et al. v. Richard W. Corey et al., U.S. District Court, Case No. 1:13-CV-01998-LJO-SAB (transferred by court to E.D.Cal. Sacramento, Case No. 2:14-CV-00186-MCE-AC).
• Documentos disponibles en un formato alterno u otro idioma.
Para solicita estas comodidades especiales o necesidades de otro idioma, por favor llame a la oficina del Consejo al (916) 322-5594 o envie un fax a (916) 322-3928 lo mas pronto posible, pero no menos de 7 dias de trabajo antes del dia programado para la audiencia del Consejo. TTY/TDD/Personas que necesiten este servicio pueden marcar el 711 para el Servicio de Retransmision de Mensajes de California.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.