Source: https://vacode.org/19.2-264.4/
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 02:18:49+00:00

Document:
A. Upon a finding that the defendant is guilty of an offense which may be punishable by death, a proceeding shall be held which shall be limited to a determination as to whether the defendant shall be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. Upon request of the defendant, a jury shall be instructed that for all Class 1 felony offenses committed after January 1, 1995, a defendant shall not be eligible for parole if sentenced to imprisonment for life. In case of trial by jury, where a sentence of death is not recommended, the defendant shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life.
A1. In any proceeding conducted pursuant to this section, the court shall permit the victim, as defined in § 19.2-11.01, upon the motion of the attorney for the Commonwealth, and with the consent of the victim, to testify in the presence of the accused regarding the impact of the offense upon the victim. The court shall limit the victim’s testimony to the factors set forth in clauses (i) through (vi) of subsection A of § 19.2-299.1.
B. In cases of trial by jury, evidence may be presented as to any matter which the court deems relevant to sentence, except that reports under the provisions of § 19.2-299, or under any rule of court, shall not be admitted into evidence.Evidence which may be admissible, subject to the rules of evidence governing admissibility, may include the circumstances surrounding the offense, the history and background of the defendant, and any other facts in mitigation of the offense. Facts in mitigation may include, but shall not be limited to, the following: (i) the defendant has no significant history of prior criminal activity, (ii) the capital felony was committed while the defendant was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional disturbance, (iii) the victim was a participant in the defendant’s conduct or consented to the act, (iv) at the time of the commission of the capital felony, the capacity of the defendant to appreciate the criminality of his conduct or to conform his conduct to the requirements of law was significantly impaired, (v) the age of the defendant at the time of the commission of the capital offense, or (vi) even if § 19.2-264.3:1.1 is inapplicable as a bar to the death penalty, the subaverage intellectual functioning of the defendant.
C. The penalty of death shall not be imposed unless the Commonwealth shall prove beyond a reasonable doubt that there is a probability based upon evidence of the prior history of the defendant or of the circumstances surrounding the commission of the offense of which he is accused that he would commit criminal acts of violence that would constitute a continuing serious threat to society, or that his conduct in committing the offense was outrageously or wantonly vile, horrible or inhuman, in that it involved torture, depravity of mind or aggravated battery to the victim.
D. In the event the jury cannot agree as to the penalty, the court shall dismiss the jury, and impose a sentence of imprisonment for life.
1977, c. 492; 1980, c. 160; 1990, cc. 316, 754; 1998, c. 485; 2000, c. 838; 2003, cc. 1031, 1040; 2010, c. 658.
If you’re reading this for anything important, you should double-check its accuracy—read § 19.2-264.4 on the official Code of Virginia website.
. . . fully admissible at the penalty trial, Code § 19.2-264.4 B, C, and that the motion was untimely, . . .
. . . prosecution. Under the applicable statute, Code § 19.2-264.4 B, discretion is vested in the . . .
. . . with a deadly weapon; . . .
. . . continuing serious threat to society. Code § 19.2-264.4(C). Testimony that a defendant who . . .
. . . fixed as is provided in | 19.2-264.4. . . .
. . . murder of Darling, see Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-264.4 (Michie 2000), after which the jury fixed . . .
. . . Death Sentence. . . .
. . . Conflict between Code § 19.2-264.2 and Code § 19.2-264.4(C). . . .
. . . wantonly vile, horrible or inhuman." Code § 19.2-264.4(C). . . .
. . . to the victim." Va.Code Ann. § 19.2-264.4(C) (1990). Bunch argues that the trial court . . .

References: § 19
 § 19
 § 19
 § 19
 § 19
 § 19
 § 19
 § 19
 § 19
 § 19
 § 19
 § 19
 § 19