Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Sec-157-Shifting-uses.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 11:43:50+00:00

Document:
At common law one could not create an estate of freehold in one person and provide that upon a certain event the seisin should shift from that person to another, as, for instance, by a feoffment to A in fee simple and upon his marriage to B in fee simple; or to A in fee simple or for life, and upon B paying a sum of money, to B in fee simple.
88. See Hayes, Limitations, 63.
89. Pybus v. Mitford, 2 Lev. 75, 1 Vent. 372; Bacon, Statute of Uses, 63; Sanders, Uses, (5th Ed.) 143; Hayes, Limitations, 64 et seq Article by Mr. Challis, Law Quart. Rev. at p. 412 et seq.
89a. Bunch v. Nicks, 50 Ark. 367, 7 S. W. 563; Abbot v. Holway, 72 Me. 298; Sabledowsky v. Ar-bucle, 50 Minn. 475, 52 N. W. 920; See Wyman v. Brown, 50 Me. 159; Savage v. Lee, 90 N. C. 320; Gray, Perpetuities, Sec.Sec. 67, 68.
90. 1 Sanders, Uses & Trusts, (5th Ed.) 150; 1 Hayes, Conveyancing, 19.
91. Sugden's Gilbert, Uses, 152; Williams, Real Prop. 378 et seq: 4 Kent, Comm. 296, 298. There are in the state of Illinois a line of dicta to the effect that a fee can be limited on a fee only by executory devise. See, e. g.. Strain v. Sweeny, 163, 111. 603; Kion v. Kion, 195 111. 181; Johnson v. Buck, 220 111. 226, 77 N. E. 163. But in Stoller v. Doyle, 257 111. 369, 100 N. E. 959, it is explicitly stated that it can, by the force of the Statute of Uses, be done by a conveyance inter vivos.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.