Source: http://www.rightsinrussia.info/archive/european-court-of-human-rights/2015/april
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 10:33:00+00:00

Document:
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of Mr Aslan Ireziyev; a procedural violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to investigate the disappearance of Mr Aslan Ireziyev; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicants on account of their brother’s disappearance and the authorities’ response to their suffering; a violation of Article 5 in respect of Mr Aslan Ireziyev; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Articles 2 and 3 of the Convention.
No violation of Article 8.
Holds that the applicant’s extradition to Kyrgyzstan would amount to a violation of Article 3; a violation of Article 5 § 4 on account of the length of the proceedings in the applicant’s appeals against the detention orders of 19 March, 21 May, 23 July and 23 September 2013; Decides to continue to indicate to the Government under Rule 39 of the Rules of Court that it is desirable, in the interests of the proper conduct of the proceedings, not to extradite the applicant until such time as the present judgment becomes final or until further order.
A violation of Article 2 under its procedural limb.
A violation of Article 3.
A substantive and a procedural violation of Article 2 by the Russian Federation.
A violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances in which Mr Rustam Kagirov disappeared.
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of Mr Rizvan Aziyev; a violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances in which Mr Rizvan Aziyev disappeared; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the mental suffering caused to the first and second applicants and no violation of Article 3 in respect of the third applicant; a violation of Article 5 in respect of Mr Rizvan Aziyev; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Article 2.
A violation of Article 5 § 3 on account of the length of the applicant’s pre-trial detention between 28 April 2003 and 14 July 2004.
A substantive violation of Article 2 in respect of the applicant’s sons Mr Apti Islamov and Mr Said-Emi Islamov; a procedural violation of Article 2 in respect of the failure to investigate effectively the disappearance of the applicant’s sons; a violation of Article 3 in respect of the applicant, on account of her sons’ disappearance and the authorities’ response to her suffering; a violation of Article 5 in respect of the applicant’s sons on account of their unlawful detention; a violation of Article 13 in conjunction with Articles 2 and 3.
A violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c).
A violation of Article 6 § 1 in respect of all five applicants.
A violation of Article 3 under its procedural aspect; a violation of Article 3 under its substantive aspect; a violation of Article 6 § 1 on account of the use of statements made by the applicant to the police as a result of ill-treatment for the purposes of his conviction; a violation of Article 6 § 1 combined with Article 6 § 3 c) on account of the lack of access to a lawyer by the applicant at the time the statements used were made when in police custody.

References: § 4
 § 3
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 3