Source: https://www.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=%20ED106162%20&s=AR&d=122584
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 18:21:42+00:00

Document:
window. The men again held the women at gunpoint, and ransacked the house for cash and jewelry.
acquaintances. Mr. Love sold drugs to Movant on credit, and Movant owed him $2,000.
interview. Movant ultimately confessed to both robberies.
2 Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966).
in the nose and stomach, and the detectives told him what to say in the second recorded interview.
Movant’s physical condition on the days surrounding his arrest and confession.
S.W.3d 700, 702 (Mo. banc 2010). On review, the motion court’s findings are presumed correct.
a mistake has been made. Moore, 328 S.W.3d at 702.
then we need not consider the other, and the claim of ineffective assistance must fail. Barnes v.
State, 506 S.W.3d 407, 410 (Mo. App. E.D. 2016).
of the first-degree robbery and first-degree burglary counts. We disagree.
S.W.3d 72, 80 (Mo. App. E.D. 2017).
ineffective assistance of counsel.” McCrady v. State, 461 S.W.3d 443, 449–50 (Mo. App. E.D.
to request an instruction that would undermine the defense theory presented at trial. Williamson v.
State, 400 S.W.3d 902, 904 (Mo. App. E.D. 2013).
(Mo. banc 2017); see also McKee v. State, 336 S.W.3d 151, 154 (Mo. App. E.D. 2011); Love v.
believe or disbelieve any evidence, whether contradicted or undisputed.”).
testified he only confessed to the crimes because Detective Garcia hit him in the nose and stomach.
after the police interview, which had not been there prior to the interview. Had the jury heard Mr.
confession was coerced and acquitted him of all charges. We disagree.
117 (Mo. App. E.D. 2010) (citing Williams v. State, 168 S.W.3d 433, 441 (Mo. banc 2005)).
willing and able to testify on his behalf. Mr. Smith testified Movant’s mother had discussed Mr.
S.W.3d 871, 880 (Mo. App. E.D. 2015) (citing Collis v. State, 334 S.W.3d 459, 464 (Mo. App.
Justice Center a few days later, he noticed Movant’s nose was swollen and cut. However, Mr.
Outcome: We affirm the judgment of the motion court.

References: v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.