Source: http://ohiolawinfo.blogspot.com/2006_02_26_archive.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 09:58:09+00:00

Document:
and birth of the child.
Schirmers’ claims for consequential economic and noneconomic damages.
that the Schirmers may not recover noneconomic damages is affirmed.
trial court dismissing the cause is reinstated.
MOYER, C.J., concurs in the syllabus and in all parts of the judgment.
to parts two, three, and four of the judgment.
from those stated in the opinion, and dissent in all other respects.
NOTE: here is the appellate court case from which the appeal to the Supreme Court of Ohio was made.
"There's Something Really Wrong Here"
I recently watched the Al Pacino lawyer flick ...and Justice for All and the above quote from Pacino's opening argument at the end of the movie came to mind when I read this story concerning the early release of convicted murderers and rapists by the state of Ohio. If after reading the story you are interested in the genesis of the "Ankrom list," check this page out at the Ohio Public Defender web site.
2004-0001. Academy of Medicine of Cincinnati v. Aetna Health, Inc., 2006-Ohio-657.
Hamilton App. Nos. C-030109, C-030110, and C-030111, 2003-Ohio-6194. Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, O'Connor and O'Donnell, JJ., concur.
2004-1024. State v. Hancock, 2006-Ohio-658.
Warren App. Nos. CA2001-12-115, CA2001-12-116, and CA2002-01-004, 2003-Ohio-1616. Judgment affirmed.
2004-1896. State ex rel. Apcompower v. Indus. Comm., 2006-Ohio-659.
Franklin App. No. 03AP-718, 2004-Ohio-5257. Judgment affirmed.
2005-0156. State ex rel. Dixon v. Airborne Express, Inc., 2006-Ohio-660.
Franklin App. No. 04AP-155, 2004-Ohio-7195. Judgment affirmed.
2005-1120. State ex rel. Stewart v. State Emp. Relations Bd., 2006-Ohio-661.
Montgomery App. No. CA 20329. Judgment affirmed.
2005-1142. State ex rel. Montgomery Cty. Pub. Defender v. Siroki, 2006-Ohio-662.
Montgomery App. No. 20433. Judgment affirmed.
2005-1687. Crase v. Bradshaw, 2006-Ohio-663.
Richland App. No. 05-CA-71. Appeal dismissed as moot.
stayed consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this appeal.
2005-2125. White v. Summit Cty.
2006-0328. State ex rel. Kuhar v. Medina Cty. Bd. of Elections.
Lundberg Stratton, J., not participating.
The Supreme Court of Ohio today launched a comprehensive redesign of its web site. The redesigned site is part of an ongoing effort by the Court to use information technology to increase public trust and confidence in the judiciary. The redesign features improved site navigation and a new Google-driven search page. Some of the more recent additions to the Court's site continue on the new site: archived and streaming video of oral arguments, case docket information, attorney look-ups, and information on the recent opening of the new Visitor Education Center.
2004-1171 and 2004-1267. State v. Mathis, 2006-Ohio-855.
Cuyahoga App. No. 83311, 2004-Ohio-2982, and Cuyahoga App.
remanded to the trial court.
Resnick, J., concurs in paragraph three of the syllabus and in judgment.
Cuyahoga App. No. 83720, 2004- Ohio-4485, Lake App. No.
O'Connor, O'Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Resnick, J., concurs in paragraph seven of the syllabus and in judgment.
2005-1432. In re Guardianship of Schneider.
2005-1652. In re Guardianship of Schneider.
in this appeal pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. III(6).
granted, and the parties shall file an original plus two copies of the evidence.
appeal of right pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. II(1)(A)(1).
and the parties shall brief this case in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.
Hamilton App. No. C-050857, 2005-Ohio-6090 and 2006-Ohio-450.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-A-1209.
are capable of being severed.
upon a jury verdict or admission of the defendant."
required before imposition of consecutive prison terms."
penalties for repeat violent offender and major drug offender specifications."
maximum, consecutive, or more than the minimum sentences."

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.