Source: http://www.jimslaughter.com/teasersdisplay.cfm?lvl=3
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 17:00:53+00:00

Document:
Is the motion to Divide the Question debatable in Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
No. RONR § 27 (p. 271).
If your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what are the requirements to order that a vote be counted?
Under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), are there minutes of a meeting held in executive session?
Under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), can a member on the floor rise to claim preference in recognition after the chair has recognized another member in debate?
Is "unanimous consent" as defined by Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) 100% approval of the action by the total membership or only by those in attendance at the meeting?
Unanimous consent requires that no one in attendance object when the chair asks "Is there any objection . . . ?" RONR § 4 (p. 55) Such a method would not be appropriate if state statute or the governing documents require a vote to be by a percentage of the total membership or some basis other than those in attendance at the meeting and voting.
If your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), are seconds required for nominations to office?
No, "but sometimes one or more membrrs will second a nomination to indicate enrosement." RONR § 46 (p. 432).
Does Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) recommend that boards be composed of an odd number of members?
No. Though many people believe that boards are compelled to have an odd number of members, no such language exists in Robert's. This is likely do the fact that in Robert's, most votes are based on a percentage of members present and voting. In other words, if a board has 6 members, but one member is absent, the vote will be based on those present, and not a total possible number of board members.
Can a Parliamentary Inquiry in Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) interrupt someone who is speaking?
If urgent, yes. RONR § 33 (p. 293).
According to Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what is an "adjourned meeting"?
"An adjourned meeting is a meeting in continuation of the session of the immediately preceding regular or special meeting." RONR § 9 (p. 93).
Can a Request for Information (formerly called a "Point of Information") interrupt a speaker?
A Request for Information "is in order when another has the floor" if it requires immediate attention. RONR § 33 (p. 293).
What is the technical term under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) where an adjournment dissolves the assembly, such as the close of a convention or when the body will not be convened against unless called into special session?
Adjournment sine die (pronounced SIGN-ee DYE-ee).
What is the consequence under Robert's Rules of making a motion proposeing to change the limits of debate made when no question is pending?
The motion is not the subsidiary motion to Limit or Extend Limits of Debate, but an incidental main motion, meaning the motion is debatable (but still requires a two-thirds vote). RONR § 15 (p. 192).
Based on Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), should a board adopt a typical treasurer's report?
No. "No action of acceptance by the assembly is required--or proper--on a financial report of the treasurer unless it is of sufficient importance, as an annual report, to be referred to auditors. In the latter case it is the auditors' report which the assembly accepts." RONR § 48 (p. 479).
In order to protect the assembly from annoyances, can a chair operating under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) require a nonmember to leave the hall without a vote of the assembly?
Yes. RONR § 61(p. 648).
Once an agenda is adopted, what vote is required to change it?
Two-thirds vote, vote of a majority of the entire membership, or unanimous consent. RONR § 32 (p. 289).
For an organization that follows Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), if an organization has no special rule relating to the length of speeches, how long may a member who has obtained the floor while a debatable motion is pending speak?
Ten minutes unless he obtains the consent of the assembly. RONR § 43 (p. 387).
If your organization follows Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), how many times is each member entitled to speak on a debatable Appeal from the Decision of the Chair?
Once, except for the presiding officer who may speak twice. RONR § 24 (p. 258).
Under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), when should the chair of a meeting ask: "Is there any unfinished business?"
Never. "The chair should not announce the heading of Unfinished Business and General Orders unless the minutes show that there is some business to come up under it. . . . He should not ask, "Is there any unfinished business?" but should state the question on the first item of business that is due to come up under the heading . . . ." ." RONR § 41 (p. 359).
Must a resolution have WHEREAS clauses under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised?
"It should be emphasized that neither rule nor custom requires a resolution to have a preamble, and one should not be used merely for the sake of form." RONR § 10 (p. 107).
What is the vote required for an Objection to the Consideration of a Question under RONR?
A two-thirds vote against consideration is required to sustain the objection. RONR § 26 p. 268).
Under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised is the chair's reply to a parliamentary inquiry subject to an appeal?
No, since it is an opinion, not a ruling. RONR § 33 (p. 294).
If your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), can a members speaking in debate yield their time to another speaker?
No. "Rights in regard to debate are not transferable. Unless the organization has a special rule on the subject, a member cannot yield any unexpired portion of his time to another member . . . . " RONR § 43 (p. 388).
Can a member using Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) rise to claim preference in being recognized after the chair has recognized another member to speak?
No. However, they can raise a Point of Order to that effect. RONR § 3(p. 31).
Do annual meetings approve minutes, if your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
No. "Minutes of one annual meeting should not be held for action until the next one a year later." RONR § 9 (p. 95). Instead, the executive board or a committee appointed for that purpose should be authorized to approve the minutes. RONR § 48 (p. 474-75).
What is meant by a friendly amendment?
"The term 'friendly amendment' is described but once in Robert's (p. 162), and then only with regard to a proposed change that the maker thinks will be seen as acceptable (or 'friendly') to the maker of the original motion. Since a motion, once stated, belongs to the assembly, a 'friendly amendment' must either be accepted by the body through unanimous consent or moved as an amendment. (See 'Modify or Withdraw a Motion," page 97 of Notes and Comments)."
If there is no rule to the contrary and your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what is the longest that a member, having obtained the floor while a debatable motion is pending, can speak without consent of the assembly?
10 minutes. RONR § 43 (p. 387).
If your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), in what circumstances can the presiding officer vote in a small board (when there are not more than about a dozen members present)?
The presiding officer of a small board of directors (if a member of the body) is a full participant—the chair can make motions, speak, and vote on all issues, although some politically choose not to do so. RONR § 49 (p. 488).
In Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised, what is the vote required to suspend an ordinary standing rule (i.e., a rule that does not relate to parliamentary procedure)?
If your parliamentary authority is Robert's, when would a motion to Limit or Extend the Limits of Debate be debatable?
The motion to Limit or Extend Limits of Debate would be debatable if made when no main motion is pending (as an incidentabl main motion). RONR § 15 (p. 192). While debatable, the motion requires a two-thirds vote for adoption.
If a treasurer of an association that follows Robert's Rules is named an "ex officio" member of the executive committee, what distinction is there between the treasurer and other board members?
If a person is ex officio a member of a board or committee due to language in the governing documents, they are a full-fledged member with all rights to participate and vote (but no obligation). Ex officio simply defines that they are on the committee due to a position they hold (ex officio = “out of office”), but the membership is the same. “In the executive board of a society, if the ex-officio member of the board is under the authority of the society (that is, if he is a member, an employee, or an elected or appointed officer of the society), there is no distinction between him and the other board members.” RONR § 49 (p. 483).
According to Robert's, when does an adopted bylaws amendment go into effect?
"[I]mmediately upon its adoption unless the motion to adopt specifies another time for its becoming effective, or the assembly has set such a time by a previously adopted motion." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 57 (p. 597).
Under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), would it be appropriate for someone who was not nominated for an office to be elected during a ballot election?
"Strictly speaking, nominations are not necessary when an election is by ballot or roll call, since each member is free to vote for any elegible person, whether he has been nominated or not." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 46 (p. 430).
What is the term in Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) for voting by postal mail, e-mail, or fax or by proxy voting.
"Absentee Voting." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 45 (p. 423).
What is the name of such an assembly?
A "deliberative assembly." Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) §1 (p. 1).
You are attending a convention, and a number of delegates have departed on the final day. How will the departing delegates affect the quorum for the convention, if your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
Not at all. "In a body of delegates, such as a convention, the quorum is a majority of the number who have been registered as attending, irrespective of whether some may have departed." Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) §40 (p. 346).
In Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what is the type of voting method (and there are many specific ones) where "on a single ballot when there are more than two possible choices, the second or less-preferred choices of voters can be taken into account if no candidate or proposition attains a majority"?
Preferential voting. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 45 (p. 425).
Under Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what is the correct wording for the chair to state the question on an Appeal?
"The question is: 'Shall the decision of the chair stand as the judgment of the assembly[or 'club,' 'society,' 'board,' etc.]" RONR § 24 (p. 259).
If your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what is the difference in the vote required to close versus to reopen nominations?
The motion to reopen nominations only requires a majority vote; while the motion to close nominations requires a two-thirds vote. According to RONR, the difference is "because (a) its adoptoin deprives members of a basic right--to nominate; and (b) the assembly must be protected against attempted abuse of the power to close nominations by a temporary majority." RONR (11th Edition) § 31 (p. 287).
If your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), is it permissible to write in the name of a candidate on the ballot, even if they were not nominated?
Yes. Unless there is governing document language to the contrary, "members still have the right, on the ballot, to case 'write-in votes" for other eligible persons." RONR § 46 (p. 442).
Your organization follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). A proposed amendment to the bylaws is pending that will require a two-thirds vote for adoption. If an amendment from the floor is proposed to the bylaws amendment, what vote is required for adoption according to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
Majority vote. "While amendments to a proposed bylaw amendment can be made in both the first and the second degrees (as applicable) and can be adopted by a majority vote without notice, they are subject to restrictions on the extent of the changes they propose." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 57 (p. 594-595).
Your organization is considering a main motion. If your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) , is it in order to move to strike out one word at the beginning of the motion and one word at the end of the motion in the same motion to amend?
No. "When a motion to strike out certain words is made, it can be applied only to consecutive words . . . . To strike out separated words, the best method is to make a motion to strike out the entire clause or sentence containing the separated words and insert a new clause or sentence as desired. Separated words can also be struck out by separate motions." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 12 (p. 139).
If your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), can a member "explain" his vote during voting?
“A member has no right to "explain his vote" during voting, which would be the same as debate at such a time.” Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 45 (p. 408).
A member realizes just after the result of a vote is announced that she accidentally voted on the wrong side of the question. If the organization’s parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what must the member do to change her vote?
You are a member of an organization that follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). At last week's meeting, a motion was adopted that you now wish to repeal. However, you were not present at that meeting. Can you make the motion to Rescind?
Yes. There are no restrictions on who may move the motion to Rescind (unlike the motion to Reconsider). Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 35 (p. 307).
Your organization follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). Is it permitted for a member to speak against her own motion? Can she vote against it?
May vote against the motion; may not speak against it. "In debate, the maker of a motion, while he can vote against it, is not allowed to speak against his own motion." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 43 (p. 393).
You are the member of an organization and have been asked to serve as parliamentarian. Are there any rights as a member that you must forego to accept this position, according to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
"A member of an assembly who acts as its parliamentarian has the same duty as the presiding officer to maintain a position of impartiality, and therefore does not make motions, participate in debate, or vote on any question except in the case of a ballot vote." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 48 (p. 467).
A new edition of the most popular parliamentary authority was released in 2011. What is the full title of the book?
Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition).
A committee has voted 8 to 3 in favor of presenting a motion to the assembly for adoption? May a committee member who does not agree with the report speak against the motion before the assembly, according to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
"But in debate on any written or oral report in the assembly, any member of the reporting committee who does not concur has the same right as any other member of the assembly to speak individually in opposition. No one can make allusion in the assembly to what has occurred during the deliberations of the committee, however, unless it is by report of the committee or by unanimous consent.” Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 51 (p. 528).
A motion is being debated at the monthly meeting of an organization that follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). After some discussion, the maker and seconder of the motion realize that a small wording change should be made to the motion. Do they have this right?
No more than other members of the assembly. “To modify a motion after it has been stated by the chair, the maker asks permission to do so, as in the case of withdrawal of a motion. If there is no objection, the chair states the question on the modified motion. If anyone objects, the chair must then determine whether an amendment equivalent to the requested modification would be in order. . . . A pending motion can be amended only by vote or unanimous consent of the assembly, even if the maker of the motion states that he ‘accepts’ the amendment.” Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 33 (p. 297-298).
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), which of the following parliamentary steps could be in order while the privileged motion to Adjourn is pending?
Your board of directors meets three times each year and follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). A member wishes to delay the consideration of a matter until more information can be obtained. Can the motion to Postpone to a Certain Time be used to delay the matter until the next board meeting?
No. "In a case where more than a quarterly time interval (see pp. 89-90) will elapse between meetings (for example, in an annual convention of delegates or in a local society that holds only an annual meeting), a question cannot be postponed beyond the end of the present session." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 14 (p. 183).
A nonmember begins to disrupt the monthly meeting of an organization that follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). The chair orders the offending nonmember to leave the hall. If the nonmember does not feel that the order is fair, what can she do about it procedurally?
"Nonmembers, on the other hand—or a particular nonmember or group of nonmembers—can be excluded at any time from part or all of a meeting of a society, or from all of its meetings. Such exclusion can be effected by a ruling of the chair in cases of disorder . . . . Members, however, can appeal from the decision of the chair. . . ." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 61 (p. 644-645).
A large board with a parliamentary authority of Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) is considering a proposal to "construct a new facility at a cost not to exceed $100,000." During debate, it becomes apparent that different members have different thoughts on the amount of money to spend on the facility. A member moves "to create a blank by striking out of the pending motion the sum '$100,000'" so that an unlimited number of proposals can be considered at the same time. Is the motion to create the blank debatable? Are suggestions to fill the blank debatable?
While the motion to create a blank is undebatable (and requires a majority vote), proposals to fill a blank in a debatable motion are debatable. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 12 (p. 164).
The members at a meeting review the minutes of the prior meeting. An error in the minutes is noted and corrected. Where does Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) suggest that corrections to the minutes be noted?
"Any correction approved by the assembly is made in the text of the minutes being approved; the minutes of the meeting making the correction merely state that the minutes were approved “as corrected,” without specifying what the correction was." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 48 (p. 469).
During a meeting, a member obtains recognition and states "this motion we're discussing is a complete waste of time and I move to table it." If the parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), how should the presiding officer respond?
The motion to Lay on the Table should be ruled out of order. "The motion to Lay on the Table enables the assembly to lay the pending question aside temporarily when something else of immediate urgency has arisen . . . ." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 17, p. 209. "It is out of order to move to lay a pending question on the table if there is evidently no other matter requiring immediate attention." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 17, p. 215.
Your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). On an Appeal, what is the effect of a tie vote?
If your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), name at least one action that cannot be rescinded.
Under The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure (4th Ed.)("Sturgis"), what is the name given to the five motions that do not present a new proposal "but concern actions that were previously taken"?
Restorative Main Motions. The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure, p. 16.
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), should nominations be seconded?
"No second is required, but sometimes one or more members will second a nomination to indicate endorsement." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 46, p. 432.
An organization that follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) is holding its annual multi-day convention. At the end of each day, the assembly recesses until the following morning, at which point there are introductory ceremonies, including an invocation and a supplemental report of the Credentials Committee. Should this be a "recess" or an "adjournment"?
Adjournment. "From the viewpoint of the effect of a recess or an adjournment on the procedure the next time the assembly is called to order, the difference is that at the conclusion of a recess there never are any 'opening' proceedings, but business is always immediately resumed where it was left off, just as if there had been no recess." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 8, p. 85.
Your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). A committee makes a report to a board, and the report only contains information. Following the report, what parliamentary action should be taken?
Likely none. "Even if a report contains only an account of work done or a statement of fact or opinion for the assembly's information, it should be in writing. Apart from filing such a report, however, no action on it is necessary and usually none should be taken." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 51, p. 525.
Your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). If a motion is made while no question is pending that proposes to change the regular limits of debate, is it debatable?
Yes. Such a motion is not the subsidiary motion to Limit or Extend Limits of Debate, but is an incidental main motion (although it requires a two-thirds vote for its adoption, just as the subsidiary motion does). Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 15, p. 192.
If your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), is a second required for nominations?
“No second is required, but sometimes one or more members will second a nomination to indicate endorsement.” Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 46, p. 432.
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), which of the following does not meet the definition of a "deliberative assembly": convention, mass meeting, committee, legislative body, board, assembly of an organized society?
Committee. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 1, p. 5.
If your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what motion requires a two-thirds vote against to be sustained?
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), to be in order, an amendment must in some way involve the same question that is raised by the motion to which it is applied. What is the name given to this principle?
"Germane" or "germaneness." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 12, p. 136.
Under The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure (4th Edition)("Sturgis"), can a member discuss a motion and then move to close debate?
No. "[I]t is out of order for a member to debate the issue and end the remarks with a motion to close debate." The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure, p. 66.
Your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). If an upcoming election for office is by ballot (and the Bylaws are silent on the matter), do you have to be nominated to be elected to office?
No. "Strictly speaking, nominations are not necessary when an election is by ballot or roll call, since each member is free to vote for any eligible person, whether he has been nominated or not. In most societies, however, it is impractical to proceed to an election without first making nominations." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 46, p. 431.
If your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), is it appropriate to seek recognition from the presiding officer to seek the floor for discussion, and then make a motion following your remarks?
A voice vote is taken at a meeting following Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), followed by a standing uncounted vote (division). A member doubts the result as announced by the Chairman. Can the member demand a counted vote?
No, but the member can move that the standing vote be counted. Such a motion is not debatable and requires a majority vote. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 30, p. 283.
According to Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what is the maximum amount of time that a member can speak at one time on a debatable motion?
10 minutes. "In a non-legislative body or organization that has no special rule relating to the length of speeches (2), a member, having obtained the floor while a debatable motion is immediately pending, can speak no longer than ten minutes unless he obtains the consent of the assembly." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 43, p. 387.
Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) states that with respect to board or committee reports, the terms "adopt," "accept," and "agree to" are equivalent. However, which term is the recommended choice in RONR?
"It is usually best to use the word adopt, however, since it is the least likely to be misunderstood." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 51, p. 508.
Your organization, which follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), has a Bylaws provision that prohibits officers from serving consecutive terms in the same office. Jane was recently appointed by the Board to fill out the remaining nine months of the Vice President's 2-year term. Can Jane be elected to the office of Vice President in the upcoming election to serve for two more years?
Yes, Jane can be elected, in that she has not served a "full term" in office. "In filling vacancies for unexpired terms, an officer who has served more than half a term in an office is considered to have served a full term." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 47, p. 448.
If your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what is necessary following a ballot election to hear the actual number of votes cast for each candidate (instead of just who won)?
Nothing. The actual number of votes cast for each candidate is a part of the tellers' report (see Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 45, p. 417. "The tellers' report is entered in full in the minutes, becoming a part of the official records of the organization. Under no circumstances should this be omitted in an election or in a vote on a critical motion out of a mistaken deference to the feelings of unsuccessful candidates or members of the losing side." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 45, p. 418.
According to Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), at what point does an election to an office become final?
If your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what motion and vote are required in order to make the assembly conform to an adopted agenda, program, or order of business?
The motion Call for the Orders of the Day is a privileged motion by which a single member can require the assembly to conform to its agenda, program, or order of business, unless two thirds of those voting wish to do otherwise." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 18, p. 211.
According to Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), by what method can a member of an organization speak during a meeting and criticize a prior act that is not pending at that time?
"In debate, a member cannot reflect adversely on any prior act of the society that is not then pending, unless a motion to reconsider, rescind, or amend it is pending, or unless he intends to conclude his remarks by making or giving notice of one of these motions." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 43, p. 393.
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), can the vote on a motion to Rescind or to Amend Something Previously Adopted be reconsidered?
"A negative vote on these motions can be reconsidered, but not an affirmative vote." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 35, p. 307.
Using Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) as your parliamentary authority, which is the only subsidiary motion in which debate on the motion can go fully into the merits of the main question?
Postpone Indefinitely. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 11, p. 127.
Using Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) as your parliamentary authority, by what motion can a member "require the assembly to conform to its agenda, program, or order of business, or to take up a general or special order that is due to come up at the time, unless two thirds of those voting wish to do otherwise"?
Call for the Orders of the Day. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 18, p. 219.
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), should minutes be signed with the words "Respectfully Submitted" as a closing?
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) (and except in a small board or a committee), when should the presiding officer stand?
"Except in a small board or a committee, the presiding officer should stand while calling a meeting to order or declaring it adjourned, and while putting a question to vote. He should also stand--without leaving the chair--while explaining his reasons for a ruling on a point of order (if the explanation entails more than a few words) or when speaking during debate on an appeal or a point of order that he has submitted to the judgment of the assembly." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 47, p. 451.
You are a member of a committee and your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). The chairman of the committee refuses to call a meeting. Is there any action you can take under RONR to force a meeting?
"When a committee has been appointed, its chairman (or first-named member temporarily acting—see p. 176) should call it together. If its chairman fails to call a meeting, the committee must meet on the call of any two of its members, unless (for very large committees) the assembly’s rules prescribe, or empower the assembly or the committee to require, a larger number." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 50, p. 499.
Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) is your parliamentary authority. A roll-call vote has been ordered, and the roll is being called in alphabetical order. If you do not wish to vote in the affirmative or negative, how should you answer?
What is the term applied to a committee that is appointed with the authority to take all the steps necessary to carry out its instructions, according to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
"A committee appointed 'with power.'" Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 50, p. 490.
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), there are two types of questions of privilege. What are they, and what is their order of importance?
"Questions of privilege are of two types: (1) those relating to the privileges of the assembly as a whole; and (2) questions of personal privilege. If the two come into competition, the former take precedence over the latter." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 19, p. 227.
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), the motions to Rescind and to Amend Something Previously Adopted require what vote to adopt?
"In an assembly, except when applied to a constitution, bylaws, or special rules of order, require (a) a two-thirds voted, (b) a majority vote when notice of intent to make the motion, stating the complete substance of the proposed change, has been given at the previous meeting or in the call of the present meeting, or (c) a vote of a majority of the entire membership—any one of which will suffice. The same vote is required for the assembly to rescind or amend an action taken by subordinate bodies, such as some executive boards, empowered to act on behalf of the assembly. In a committee, these motions require a two-thirds vote unless all committee members who voted for the motion to be rescinded or amended are present or have received ample notice, in which case they require a majority vote." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 35, p. 306.
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), does a member have the right to explain her vote during voting?
If your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), can a motion to Amend be made while a motion to Postpone Indefinitely is pending?
Yes. The motion to Postpone Indefinitely is not amendable, but an amendment can be proposed to the main motion while a motion to Postpone Indefinitely is pending. RONR makes the following statement pertaining to the motion to Amend: "When applied to a main motion: It takes precedence over the main motion and over the subsidiary motion to Postpone Indefinitely." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 12, p. 131.
You are attending a convention governed by Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) and wish to change the program after its adoption. What vote is required?
Using Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) as your parliamentary authority, name at least four different types of nominations.
Your organization follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). Should the minutes reflect how each member voted if a count has been ordered?
No. The names of members and how they voted should only be noted on a roll call vote. "When a count has been ordered or the vote is by ballot, the number of votes on each side should be entered; and when the voting is by roll call, the names of those voting on each side and those answering 'Present' should be entered. If members fail to respond on a roll-call vote, enough of their names should be recorded as present to reflect that a quorum was present at the time of the vote. If the chair voted, no special mention of this fact is made in the minutes." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 48, p. 454.
A school board meets monthly with a parliamentary authority of Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). Using the motion to Postpone to a Certain Time, how long can a matter be postponed?
"In cases where no more than a quarterly time interval will elapse between sessions, a question can be postponed until, but not beyond, the next regular business session. For example, in a society that holds regular business meetings on the same day of each week, a question cannot, at one meeting, be postponed for longer than a week." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 14, p. 183.
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), the official organization of a convention is brought about by the separate consideration and adoption of the reports of what three committees in what order?
The Credentials Committee, the Committee on Standing Rules, and the Program Committee. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 59, p. 609-610.
What are the rights of the presiding officer to vote in the event of a ballot vote, according to The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure (4th Edition)?
Ballot Voting. When vote is by ballot, the presiding officer (if a member of the organization) votes the same as anyone else. But in such cases if a tie results, the chair cannot break the tie by voting a second time unless the bylaws provide that this may be done in case of a deadlock tie vote. The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure, page 137.
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what is the proper form for making a Request for Information when information is desired of another member who is speaking?
"Madam President, will the member yield for a question?"
"Mr. President, I would like to ask the gentlemen [or 'the member'] a question."
"If the speaker consents to the interruption, the time consumed will be taken out of his allowed time." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 33, p. 295.
Your parliamentary authority is Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) and no state statutes govern your organization. Under what circumstances can a member examine the minutes of the society? Can the member also examine the minutes of the society's board of directors, if she is not a member of the board?
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), the seconder of a motion can speak against (if the motion is debatable) or vote against the motion he seconded. What can the maker of the motion NOT do?
"In debate, the maker of a motion, while he can vote against it, is not allowed to speak against his own motion. He need not speak at all, but if he does he is obliged to take a favorable position. If he changes his mind while the motion he made is pending, he can, in effect, advise the assembly of this by asking permission to withdraw the motion (pp. 295-97)." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 43, p. 393.
You are a member of a five person board of directors that follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) to the letter. (The board does not have any adopted procedural rules, other than Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition).) A resolution is being discussed concerning holding the annual general membership meeting in Chicago, IL. A motion is made to postpone the discussion and vote on the resolution until the next board meeting. Does the motion to postpone to a certain time need a second to be considered?
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), an affirmative vote on a motion to Commit (or Refer) cannot be reconsidered if the committee has begun consideration of the question. Why?
Because the motion to Discharge a Committee (see section 36) must be used. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 13, p. 171.
Demeter's Manual of Parliamentary Law suggests the mnemonic S-H-I-P for remembering the subjects upon which a question of privilege may be raised. What does each letter represent?
"Question of privilege relates in a broad interpretation to the following subjects: the members' Safety, Health, or Integrity, or protection of their Property (catchword: S-H-I-P). When a member rises to a question of privilege or personal privilege and is asked to state it, he is expected to reveal or point out something concerning these four subjects; namely, the subjects S-H-I-P." Demeter, p. 106.
The board of an association is required by its bylaws to meet the first Thursday of each month. At this month's meeting, a quorum is not present prior to the start of the meeting. The officers attempt to obtain a quorum, but are not successful. As a result, no business is transacted. Must another meeting on another day in the same month be held to comply with the bylaws requirement, if the organization's parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
No. "But if a quorum fails to appear at a regular or properly called meeting, the inability to transact business does not detract from the fact that the society's rules requiring the meeting to be held were complied with and the meeting was convened--even though it had to adjourn immediately." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 40, p. 347.
You are a member of a ten person board with a parliamentary authority of Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). Three members have left the board and replacements have not yet been named. If all rules of the organization are silent as to quorum, how many individuals must be present at a meeting to transact business?
Four. "In any other deliberative assembly with enrolled membership whose bylaws do not specify a quorum, the quorum is a majority of all the members." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 40, p. 346. At present, the total membership of the board is seven (and four is a majority of seven).
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what are the notice and vote requirements to adopt a standing rule which is not related to a convention?
A convention is considering the report of the resolutions committee (which has been presented as one motion on a series of different subjects). The parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). What vote is required if a member wishes for one of the resolutions to receive separate consideration and a vote?
Your organization follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). A member has repeatedly questioned the motives of other members. The chair has called the member to order, but the member refuses to be quiet. Does the chair have the authority to order the offending member removed from the hall?
No. "Although the chair has no authority to impose a penalty or to order the offending member removed from the hall, the assembly has that power." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 61, p. 646.
Your organization's bylaws provide that the executive director is an "ex-officio member of the board of directors," but give no other guidance. Is the executive director allowed to vote and to make motions during meetings of the board of directors? The parliamentary authority of the organization is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition).
Unless expressly stated differently in the bylaws, an ex-officio member has all rights of membership--including the right to participate in debate and to vote. "In the executive board of a society, if the ex-officio member of the board is under the authority of the society (that is, if he is a member, an employee, or an elected or appointed officer of the society), there is no distinction between him and the other board members." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 49, p. 483.
According to Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), what types of meetings should be closed to members of the organization?
"In any society, certain matters relating to discipline, such as trials, must be handled only in executive session." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 9 (p. 95).
Your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). At the end of business at a regular meeting of an ordinary society, the chair asked, "Is there any further business?" When there was no response, the chair adjourned the meeting. Should the chair have asked for or waited for a motion to adjourn?
No. "When it appears that there is no further business in a meeting of an ordinary local society that normally goes through a complete order of business at each regular meeting, the chair, instead of waiting or calling for a motion to adjourn, can ask, "Is there any further business?" If there is no response, the chair can then say, "Since there is no further business, the meeting is adjourned." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 21 (p. 241).
If your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), under what circumstances is the motion to Appeal not debatable?
When the motion "(a) relates to indecorum or a transgression of the rules of speaking; (b) relates to the priority of business; or (c) is made when an undebatable question is immediately pending or involved in the appeal." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 24 (p. 257).
A member of an organization that follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) wants to prepare a resolution in favor of naming a new school for John Doe. John Doe has two major arguments in favor of such recognition: (1) he was the first superintendent of the school system many years earlier; and (2) he later went on to serve his state with distinction as Governor. Using these facts, prepare a resolution with two "Whereas" clauses in proper form.
While "Whereas" clauses are not required, they are sometimes included in a resolution when it is desirable to include a brief statement of background (or when it is the custom of the organization). In this brainteaser, any language will do--it is the form that is important.
Resolved, That the new school to be opened in August of 2001 shall be named the John Doe Elementary School.
(p. 105-09), which also notes appropriate variations on this language.
An organization that follows Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). anticipates a particularly difficult meeting and wants to bring in an outside person to chair the meeting. Is such a procedure allowed, and if so, what must be done to permit a nonmember to preside?
Yes, it is appropriate for an invited nonmember who is skilled in presiding to chair. If the president and the vice-president(s) do not object, the assembly, by majority vote, can adopt such an arrangement for all or part of a session. Alternatively, the rules may be suspended to authorize it, even over the objection of the president or a vice-president." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 47 (p. 453-54).
You are a member of a board with fewer than a dozen members. According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), name four ways in which the rules governing such a meeting are different than the rules that hold in other assemblies.
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), which of the following items should be included in minutes?
What terms are used in Sturgis Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure in place of the motions to "Lay on the Table" and the "Previous Question" (the terms used in Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition))?
A motion is made and seconded that, "The club sponsor a pool party this summer at a cost not to exceed $500." Following some discussion, a motion is made to amend the motion by changing "pool party" to "picnic." The motion to amend receives a second and is now under discussion. A member is recognized and moves to make an "amendment to the amendment" by striking the word "summer" and inserting in its place "fall" (so that the event will be in the fall, rather than the summer). Is this motion to amend in order if your parliamentary authority is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
No. While it is proper to propose an "amendment to an amendment" (often referred to as a "secondary amendment"), the amendment must propose a change to the primary amendment. In the example above, the proposed secondary amendment has nothing to do with the primary amendment of changing "pool party" to "picnic," but pertains to another part of the main motion. As a result, such an amendment is out of order at the present time. Once consideration of the primary amendment is completed, such a motion to amend "summer" to "fall" would be in order. Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 12 (p. 135).
A presiding officer is convinced that a member is using parliamentary motions for obstructive purposes. What procedural course of action can the presiding officer take to resolve the situation, according to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
"Whenever the chair becomes convinced that one or more members are using parliamentary forms for dilatory purposes, he should either not recognize these members or he should rule that such motions are out of order—but he should never adopt such a course merely to speed up business, and he should never permit his personal feelings to affect his judgment in such cases. If the chair only suspects that a motion is not made in good faith, he should give the maker of the motion the benefit of the doubt. The chair should always be courteous and fair, but at the same time he should be firm in protecting the assembly from imposition." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 39 (p. 343).
You are at the monthly meeting of an organization following Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). A main motion, amendment, and motion to refer are pending. A motion is made and adopted to close debate on all pending motions. The motion to Refer is voted on and defeated. The motion to Amend is voted on and adopted. The chair begins to state, "The question is on the adoption of the main motion as amended . . .," when she notices a member seeking recognition. The member is recognized and moves to Table the main motion on the grounds that something else of immediate urgency has arisen. Is the motion to Table in order given that the Previous Question has already been adopted and several votes taken?
Yes, the motion to Table is in order. "If debate has been closed by ordering the Previous Question or by the expiration of the time to which debate was limited, then up until the moment of taking the last vote under the order, the questions still before the assembly can be laid on the table." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 17 (p. 212).
You are the parliamentarian for a monthly meeting following Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). Votes are traditionally taken by a show of hands. After a relatively close vote, a member calls for a Division of the assembly. The member makes clear that he only expects a rising vote, not a counted vote. The chair feels that a Division is not necessary because the previous vote was by hands and was the same as a Division. Is the member entitled to a rising vote?
Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure (4th Edition) recognizes that one use of the motion to suspend the rules is to "cancel out everything that has been done" on a motion when "the parliamentary situation in a meeting becomes so confused that neither the chair nor the members can figure out how to proceed." What is the name given to this use of the motion to suspend the rules?
The "Gordian Knot" Motion, p. 86.
Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) generally permits an individual to speak to any debatable motion two times on the same day. Name a motion which if debatable permits members to only speak once, but the presiding officer may speak to the motion twice.
A bylaws amendment takes effect immediately unless another time is specified for its becoming effective. "While the amendment is pending, a motion can be made to amend the enacting words of the motion to amend by adding a clause such as this: '. . . with the proviso that [or, '. . . provided, however, that'] this amendment shall not go into effect until after the close of this annual meeting.'" Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 57 (p. 597).
The motion on the floor at a meeting following Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) is that "delegates to the state convention be instructed to vote for the dues increase." Is a motion to amend by inserting the word "not" between the words "convention" and "be" in order? Is a motion to amend by inserting the word "not" between the words "instructed" and "to" in order?
Not in order as to "not be instructed." In order as to "instructed not to vote."
"Thus, in the motion that 'our delegates be instructed to vote in favor of the increase in Federation dues,' an amendment to insert 'not' before 'be' is out of order because an affirmative vote on not giving a certain instruction is identical with a negative vote on giving the same instruction. But it would be in order to move to insert 'not' before 'to' ('instructed not to vote in favor'), since this would change the main motion into one to give different instructions." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 12 (p. 138).
According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), list the basic bylaws of an organization.
You are planning the annual convention for your organization (which uses Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)). What should be the first item of business following any preliminary ceremonies (welcome, pledge, introductions, etc.) on the first day of the convention?
"The official organization of the convention is brought about by the separate consideration and adoption of the reports of three committees mentioned above--the Credentials Committee, the Committee on Standing Rules, and the Program Committee, in that order." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 59 (p. 609-10).
The bylaws of your organization (which uses Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) as a parliamentary authority) provides that the officers shall "be elected by ballot." The same person has held the office of Treasurer for 12 years and is unopposed for re-election. The organization is 100% behind her election. Can the ballot be taken by a voice vote if there is unanimous consent? Can a motion be made to suspend the bylaws to allow such an election?
No, a ballot vote must be taken. "The assembly cannot make valid a viva-voce election if the bylaws require the election to be by ballot.” Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 46 (p. 443). In addition, bylaws rarely can be suspended and cannot be in such an instance. See Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 2 (p. 17).
One of the basic headings in the order of business is often erroneously referred to as "Old Business." What is the proper title for this portion of the program, and how does an item get placed in this heading according to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
"The heading of Unfinished Business and General Orders includes items of business in the four categories that are listed below:"
You are a member of an organization with a parliamentary authority of Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). Your elected board of directors recently held an important meeting and you wish to see a copy of minutes. Are you entitled the minutes?
The parliamentary authority of your organization is Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition). According to the Bylaws of the organization, the Treasurer is an ex-officio member of the Finance Committee. Can the Treasurer speak and/or vote at Finance Committee meetings?
A nominating committee wishes to nominate one of its own members for president of the organization. Is this appropriate according to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
If there is no specific rule on the subject, can the chairman of a meeting exclude nonmembers from the meeting if the nonmembers are causing no disruption, according to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
A close voice vote has been taken, and a member then calls for a division. Another member is then recognized by the presiding officer and moves to adjourn. Is the motion in order according to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition)?
The President-Elect of an organization has upset numerous members with recent statements about what he will do as President. According to Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition), can the assembly now elect someone other than the President-Elect to the office of President?
Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 47 (p. 457) "Once a person has been elected president-elect, the assembly cannot alter its decision regarding the succession of that person to the presidency, unless he vacates office during his term as president-elect or unless ground arises for deposing him from that office (see p. 653-54)."
Previous Question - "I move to close debate and vote immediately."
Quasi-Committee of the Whole - Treat as motion to consider informally.
"[I]mmediately upon its adoption unless the motion to adopt specifies another time for its becoming effective, or the assembly has set such a time by a previously adopted motion." Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised (11th Edition) § 57(p. 597).

References: § 27
 § 4
 § 46
 § 33
 § 9
 § 33
 § 15
 § 48
 § 61
 § 32
 § 43
 § 24
 § 41
 § 10
 § 26
 § 33
 § 43
 § 3
 § 9
 § 48
 § 43
 § 49
 § 15
 § 49
 § 57
 § 46
 § 45
 §1
 §40
 § 45
 § 24
 § 31
 § 46
 § 57
 § 12
 § 45
 § 35
 § 43
 § 48
 § 51
 § 33
 § 14
 § 61
 § 12
 § 48
 § 17
 § 17
 § 46
 § 8
 § 51
 § 15
 § 46
 § 1
 § 12
 § 46
 § 30
 § 43
 § 51
 § 47
 § 45
 § 45
 § 18
 § 43
 § 35
 § 11
 § 18
 § 47
 § 50
 § 50
 § 19
 § 35
 § 12
 § 48
 § 14
 § 59
 § 33
 § 43
 § 13
 § 40
 § 40
 § 61
 § 49
 § 9
 § 21
 § 24
 § 47
 § 12
 § 39
 § 17
 § 57
 § 12
 § 59
 § 46
 § 2
 § 47
 § 57