Source: https://moritzlaw.osu.edu/electionlaw/index.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 17:09:12+00:00

Document:
Nov. 2 (4:00 PM) - Ruling on the plaintiffs\' emergency motion, a U.S. District Judge ordered that individuals flagged for potential citizenship issues by a Georgia database can still vote in the midterms. The judge\'s order set forth specific ways these indivduals can vote. The case is Georgia Coalition for the People\'s Agenda v. Kemp.
Oct. 31 (3:30 PM) - A divided panel of Sixth Circuit judges granted the plaintiffs\' emergency motion, ruling that county boards of elections must count provisional ballots cast by voters who had been purged from the voter rolls for not voting during a 6-year period. The decision temporarily blocks a lower court ruling that the purges were legal. The state indicated that it will not appeal the Sixth Circuit decision. The case is Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Husted.
Oct. 11 (1:30 PM) - Ruling on forms used by the state of Ohio to remove inactive voters from the voter rolls, U.S. District Judge George Smith found one minor violation of the National Voter Registration Act, but otherwise ruled that the forms did not violate federal law. The case is Ohio A. Philip Randolph Institute v. Husted.
Aug. 28 (8:45 AM) - On remand from the U.S. Supreme Court, a divided three-judge court in the Middle District of North Carolina found a Congressional redistricting plan to be an unconstitutional partisan gerrymander. The case is Common Cause v. Rucho.
Jun. 25 (12:30 PM) - In a 5-4 decision that reversed the ruling of the District Court, the U.S. Supreme Court determined that the drawing of most of the disputed Texas districts did not violate the Constitution or the Voting Rights Act. The case is Abbott v. Perez.
Jun. 25 (11:30 AM) - In a North Carolina gerrymandering case, the U.S. Supreme Court summarily vacated the judgment of the District Court and remanded the case for additional consideration in light of the Court\'s recent opinion of Gill v. Whitford. The case is Rucho v. Common Cause.
Jun. 18 (11:40 AM) - In opinions issued today, the U.S. Supreme Court decided two gerrymandering cases on procedural grounds. In an opinion in the Wisconsin case of Gill v. Whitford, the Court found that the plaintiffs did not have standing to challenge the legislature\'s redistricting plan. In an opinion in the Maryland case of Benisek v. Lamone, the Court determined that the District Court was within its discretion in denying preliminary relief to the plaintiffs challenging the legislature\'s redistricting plan.
Election Law @ Moritz has assembled a set of resources concerning the topic of elections going into overtime.
The latest election law news from across the country...last updated June 15 (10:34 AM).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.