Source: http://rychlicki.net/en/issue/polish-law/polish-administrative-proceedings-code/art-73-%C2%A71-apc/
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 00:21:41+00:00

Document:
The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 20 March 2008 case file II GSK 459/07 held at the begining of judgment’s justification that administrative decisions are public information within the meaning of article 1(1) of the API and may be disclosed, in accordance with 6(1) pt 4 letter a, first tiret of the API. According to the SAC, after completion of the application proceedings, including any inter partes proceedings, article 251 of the IPL will no longer be applicable, and access to case files will be based on the general provisions of the API. Pursuant to article2(2) of the API, the Authority cannot require to prove legitemate or factual interest from the person entitled to a right to public information.
The Court also held that not all documents from the case file should be considered public information. Such nature have only official documents. Pursuant to article 6(2) of the API, an official document within the meaning of the Act is the content of the declaration of will or knowledge, recorded and signed, in any form by a public official under the provisions of the Penal Code, within its competence, that is addressed to another entity or put to the file.
See also “Polish Patent Office, case II SAB/Wa 99/06“.
Categories: Art. 1(1) API | Art. 245 IPL | Art. 251 IPL | Art. 252 IPL | Art. 61 Constitution | Art. 73 §1 APC | case law | Polish Act on Access to Public Information | Polish Administrative Proceedings Code | Polish Constitution | Polish Patent Office | Polish Supreme Administrative Court | Voivodeship Administrative Court.

References: Art. 1
 Art. 245
 Art. 251
 Art. 252
 Art. 61
 Art. 73
 §1