Source: http://doctheshow.com/AddendumTimelineAnnotate.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 06:21:38+00:00

Document:
Rod did not particularly support either candidate during the Election 2016, they both gave good arguments, but he does not particularly agree with the New York Time article that seems one sided; and that is the Rod's definition of fake-news presenting one-sided stories but not the equal other side. Correlation being in a time line does not make a conspiracy. Collusion among people is not illegal. Rod will write on it for a couple days waiting for that Supreme Court hearing on Monday. He annotates it as followed, but he is not a lawyer, for legal advice seek a licensed attorney.
Wasn't The Agreement was to improve relationship between Russia and the United States? It appears to Rod, you have a person, who had never thought of being President in his life, definable not understanding all the roles; much less laws surrounding those roles. Here a person may have thought his role correct; but by mistake of Fact in Law, Ignorance in Law, Ignorance or Mistake, had people exerting a better relation with Russia, jumping the gun acting out his Presidential roles, that the past administration, President Obama and Hillary Clinton, tried but failed. This conduct is no more a conspiracy, than Hillary Clinton initially not understanding how servers and emails work. This is supported by § Model Penal Code § 2.04 and Article Two of the constitution. There was no warning made against him from that Present President for jumping the gun exercising his role as President; he was sure he would win. President Obama even made this statement before 2016 Election having received daily intelligence briefings, including facts on the Russian emails, most of the time in his role as President, that he doubted that anyone could interfere with an Election enough to change the outcome. There was no conspiracy, only a bunch of overzealous people trying to exert their roles working under the President Elect Trump. Some may have not known emails hacked, not top secret, were any more illegal than Hillary Clinton destroying emails and server requested by the FBI or Justice Department. The two most important differences were the Mens Reus of the Actors, there was no “intent to cover up,” what the majority people working for Trump were doing, there was little showing of “criminal intent” in their actions, in clear open view, it was mostly open on emails, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, and other social media sites. Many stated that they had not met with Russian about the campaign; but many never denied trying to improve relationship with Russia. That is the overlying theme of this time line and well within Article II of the Constitution. The Agreement was to improve relationship between Russia and the United States. Some may been a bit confused about the difference between the two, and some denied one and not the other, but Rod thinks that is, what is, the theme of New York Time line if you take away the authors’’ conjectures, guesses, and speculations.
Rod thinks from the article in the New York Times, Corey Lewandowski, Hope Hicks, Sessions, Scavino, Sam Clovis, Rick Dearborn, Rob Goldstone, Stephen Miller, Carter Page, Dan Scavino work on the American side to improve relations with Russia. Although, they may deny it. Rod has never spoken to and has no direct connection to these individuals.
Rod thinks from the article in the New York Times, Sergey I. Kislyak, Timofeev, Clovis, Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Aras Agalarov, Emin Agalarov, Oleg V. Deripaska, Sergey I. Kislyak, Vladamir V. Putin, Alexander Torshin, Ivan Timofeev work to improve relationships with America from the Russia side. Although, they may deny it. Rod has never spoken to and has no direct connection to these individuals.
Donald Trump receives email from Goldstone, British-born publicist, that Donald joined a Russian social media platform to appeal to Russian American voters. There are around 5 million Russian American, maybe a couple million may vote. Scavino, Trump Jr. and a personal assistant email about setting up a page for Trump campaign. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
Russians in America have not been made illegal and put in concentration camps yet.
It is Rod's belief, Trump wants to better the relationship of the two Countries after he is elected by building a Hotel in Moscow. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
Poland wants him to build Fort Trump last week, 2018.
In Rod’s opinion, Back channel, if not in person and much like North Korea meeting there was talk of not meeting at either Headquarters but at a neutral place described in an email someone labeled Kremlin Connection. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
According to the article, Trump announces his Campaign, about a month later Trump is invited to Russia during the 60 birthday celebration of the dad of a famous pop music star and claim he may get Puttin to attend if he comes. But, Trump declines, instead tweet an appreciative “Russia and the world has already started to respect us again!” Aras Agalarov sends Trump a letter back in appreciation of his tweet and promises a better relationship with Russia than the past US administration. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
“U.S. Foreign Policy Powers: Congress and the President.” Council on Foreign Relations, Council on Foreign Relations, www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-foreign-policy-powers-congress-and-president "Powers of the President The president’s authority in foreign affairs, as in all areas, is rooted in Article II of the Constitution. The charter grants the officeholder the powers to make treaties and appoint ambassadors with the advice and consent of the Senate (Treaties require approval of two-thirds of senators present. Appointments require consent of a simple majority.) Presidents also rely on other clauses to support their foreign policy actions, particularly those that bestow “executive power” and the role of “commander in chief of the army and navy” on the office. From this language springs a wide array of associated or “implied” powers. For instance, from the explicit power to appoint and receive ambassadors flows the implicit authority to recognize foreign governments and conduct diplomacy with other countries generally. From the commander-in-chief clause flow powers to use military force and collect foreign intelligence. Presidents also draw on statutory authorities. Congress has passed legislation giving the executive additional authority to act on specific foreign policy issues. For instance, the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (1977) authorizes the president to impose economic sanctions on foreign entities. Presidents also cite case law to support their claims of authority. In particular, two U.S. Supreme Court decisions—United States. v. Curtiss-Wright Export Corporation (1936) and Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. Sawyer (1952)—are touchstones."
According to the article, Trump meets Sergey l. Kislyak , Russian Ambassador, living in the United States before Trump’s major policy speech. He is setting Presidential policy. Mistake of Fact and Law maybe, but no conspiracy yet from Trump. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
Clinches Republican nomination by American citizens.
Calls Putin a “strong leader.” Again improving relationship with Russia. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
“American Government.” Making Foreign Policy, www.cliffsnotes.com/study-guides/american-government/foreign-policy/making-foreign-policy "Making Foreign Policy Under the Constitution, both the president and Congress have a role in foreign policy. Each has been given specific powers and has assumed additional authority either through precedent or by relying on other constitutional responsibilities. Since the Vietnam War, Congress has tried to exert more influence and control over foreign policy. The president and foreign policy The president negotiates treaties, appoints ambassadors to represent the United States overseas, and is commander in chief of the armed forces. Throughout U.S. history, presidents have used their power as head of the military to involve the nation in numerous conflicts abroad without a formal declaration of war by Congress, and they have found other ways to get around constitutionally imposed limitations on their ability to set the direction of American foreign policy. Even though they are effective only during the term of the president who made them, executive agreements negotiated with another head of state do not require Senate approval. Presidents also have access to discretionary funds that can be (and have been) used to finance both military and diplomatic initiatives. Presidents routinely rely on special envoys, who do not require Senate confirmation, to carry out negotiations with other countries."
George Papadopoulos setting Trump up for a meeting with Russia. Papadopoulos say he is told that Russia has dirt on Clinton in form of emails. He spreads the rumors to the right people to get to Trump. It appears that he is not high on the list with Trump, and has no direct contact with Trump. He like, Cohen, is emailing all the right people, Lewandowski, Miller, Manafort, trying to set up this good relationship with Russia when Trump is President. They are working with a liaise name Timovee to arrange a meeting hosting Trump when he arrives in Russia, maybe a Putin meeting. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
From the Article, Many Things the President said were opinion or belief but Not Illegal.
"Access Hollywood" tape of Trump making lewd remarks about women surfaces." The article says he make these statements....(Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
Paul Manaford, Jared Kushner, Donald Trump Jr. meet Russian Lawyer Natalia VeseInitskaya, Ike Kaveladze attended the meeting as representative Ara, pop Russian star Emin and his father Aras Agalarov, Russian Developer that hosted Trump-owned Miss Universe pageant in Moscow in 2013, Rinat Akhmetshin, Russian American Lobbyst, Anatoli Samochornov (VeseInitskaya Translator, a former state department employee), and Rod Goldstone (Wikipedia) (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
Donald Trump Jr. makes false statement according to the article. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
It has not been disclosed open to the public what happened and everything that was said totally in that meeting; maybe now with Manaford cooperating, but facts may still not be in agreement between all parties; so it is inferior for us to speculate that so many high level people met just a whole bunch of emails; later described as nothing much by some.
"In rejecting this doctrine in Sharma v. State, 56 P.3d 868 (Nevada 2002), the Nevada court stated: To be convicted of an attempt to commit a crime in Nevada, the State must show, among other things, that the accused committed an act with the intent to commit that crime."
May present Negligence and Culpability of U.S. Government, Twitter, Facebook, and any platform that allows WikiLeaks to spread information. But, Rod is not a lawyer.
Guccifer 2.0: “Hi! I’m on Twitter now! this is my official account!” WikiLeaks asks Guccifer 2.0 for the stolen D.N.C. emails. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
Look how many times this New York Time's article tried to frame people in their time-line as mention Wikileaks as part of their Russian Conspiracy.
there was accusation that they had spread discourse into America. He never removed Reuters because of their great reputation in the world for news. Alex Jones was banned from Twitter, but some Russian media initial accused of spreading information into the United States to spread discourse in America. Putin is a bad man but his Twitter account and the Russian Government accounts are still open. Why is wikileaks still on Twitter communicating with millions and millions through those questionable "impression numbers" maybe, on Twitter? Espionage, maybe, is not protected free speech and even though Twitter is following European Law, are they not still an American company under American Law? Rod only banned one person from his list permanently and that was Wikileaks but he never thought about putting Snowden in any list. He does not have anything personally against the two, but they may have been involved in espionage against the United States and he does not approve of people stealing top secret or classified information from the United States, and releasing it to the public; unless it has been declassified; emails are or should not be classified or top secret. He later temporarily removed people who retweeted Wikileaks on a regular basis.
Sorry folks this is free speech in America.
Sorry folks, most opinions are not “Fake News” in America.
And yes, Wikipedia has a more in depth allegation of Russian interference as there article is probable a government project with such ineptness, Timeline of Russian interference in the 2016 United States elections but they too, confuse Russia interfering with election and Russia and America improving their relation as in Article II. But, Rod would be one-sided if he did not at least mention this information out there. No Rod is not going to read all that stuff; it is much repetitive of the same inferences and situations discussed in this paper.
A Good Bot is an aggregated or compiled group of information assimilated to be dispersed automatically over another platform. For example, a person who has done twenty years’ research, and decides to give it away free in an entertaining method using 140 characters at a time. So, he spends months putting this information together to Tweet out, over and over, at a set time, through infinity maybe. You can design these to fit whatever platform you may want to work on. At one time you could transform yourself into a Good Bot by using some tools like Tweet Deck, or today some others maybe, so your tweets came out at specific times for given times for several days or more. Rod generally had suspicion when you yourself was a Bot because your tweets came out perfect day after day at a certain time, maybe every one hour or every half hour or at a certain hour. There is no malicious act going on here just people using technology as it is supposed to be used to make their and your experience more entertaining and meaningful. Thousands, if not millions, may be doing this on Twitter. In addition, they may choose to aggregate all of Einstein's work, Shakespeare's work, a series of math or science calculation into similar Bots to fit the 140-character platform on Twitter. Or some mom wanted to aggregate all of her food recipes, or for that matter, a person is using a stage name themed to all Italian or Russian recipes into a bot to work on the Twitter platform. Or someone wanted to list, well there is tons of things to put on the automatic bots like news, history, unproven conspiracy theories that still needed research work, statistics, and many others. So, just do not use the word loosely and mess up important research and education because you don't understand entertainment, education, and how research work on Twitter. Rod used Good Bots in list making. They kept the list moving 24 hours a day and provided reliable content and entertainment to Twitter users.
Virtual Communities are much the same. Rod learned how to create Virtual Communities in 2011 course at UNLV called “Journalism and Media Studies.” An MBA intern graduate student taught the law, ethics, etiquette, and the full picture of using social media; both business and personal. She taught the class to use different platforms; naming a few, Twitter, BlogSpot, and Facebook. The main professor specialty was a new concept of building Virtual World communities that interacted like-human communities but they operated on different platforms from what she taught. Rod concept during the class was to build the Virtual Communities from what he taught using other platforms that he would choose to like in the class. In the professor’s virtual communities, we were taught not to use our real names, because in the virtual world you may not want wanting everyone knowing who you were and it was somewhere between entertainment stage names, spunky names that someone may like, and theme names. So in the virtual world, imaginary world, account names and real people are often not one in the same. These communities could also be built on Facebook or Twitter. Rod explored building the communities by using his classmates building Twitter list. His Thesis for the class was to build these communities in every Country in the world connecting regional people to other people in their region. There would be one in Europe, Africa, China, Latin America, Russia, Canada, and the list could go on, but they would connect each Community or 100,00 or so to people in their own region; but the communities would be built from America because that is where he lived. After the class ended, he expanded his Twitter list for research, personal entertainment purposes, and educational purposes. He brought for sources unto his list from his college history of studding international Business, Law, and Entertainment; he knew many of the important people from reading about them from the books. He knew all the old entertainers from growing up with a passion for entertainment. He knew many of the new leaders in the fields from staying focused on current events and news. At one point, the list contained 100,000 or more world leaders, Presidents, Prime Ministers, CEOs, world organizations, entertainers, music producers, movie producers, unions, food hobbyist, artist, military, politicians, national and local organizations, agencies, journalist, government and regular folks like him. The list had businesses, farming, government officials, researchers of all types of information, and doctors. It had world church folks, preachers, bishops, and the Vatican. Rod chose select scholars of medicine, agriculture, sports greatest, magazines, universities, colleges, trade associations, and farmers markets for the List. The show had many television shows, many cities, tourism, all, most nations, and news networks. That was a beta test of a Web Developer Rod Jackson had thought about building in the college classroom as his thesis. This community of list was costly to build in time and no economical return. At retirement, in Rodney’s opinion, the lists were maybe 50,000 shows in one with each, a person in each list, putting on their own shows with right balance in each list to serve Rods initial purpose. Rodney knowledge made the greatest listing in the cloud. Of course, virtual communities can be built using different platforms, BlogSpot, Websites, Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Wikipedia, and many others. So good communities are great and serve great purposes. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
But, just like Bots, there can be good bots and bad bots, but it does not make neither fake. This leads into the story of the New York Times. From Rod’s study in law a joinder is the joining of two or more legal issues, and in this story a misjoinder is needed because persons are wrongfully joined as plaintiffs or defendants in this story to attempt to prove a conspiracy or wrong-doing; in other words, where persons are made parties who ought not to be together, they are separated and tried separate, in this case, the public, written as a different article, in court, the two not in the same court proceeding would be the cure. Inferior on a subject such as Virtual Communities and the way they are designed, and given inferior word terminology and information leads to false premises, false analysis, and false conclusions to investigation which may lead to false prosecution on bad evidence. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
Rod looking at his article on see one illegal things pointed out written in the article and that is using someone else’s social security. Bad actors are not really illegal and no violent act never came from the Russian built American Community. Calling everything thing from advertising, too accounts, too opinions, do not make them legally illegal. This just inferior in understanding Virtual Communities and how they work. Calling everything that you don’t understand fake, is, but, a humorous or malicious deception, which is the definition of Hoax. A virtual community could be located in Russia and have imaginary and real people from America. It all depends on the community designer. But, that in itself, is not illegal, in the Virtual Reality world of Building communities. It would not be fake to have 2,700 accounts from Facebook, 470 Facebook pages, in a Virtual Community. When, Rod retired and closed his list, Twitter had no such things as “fake accounts” or “troll accounts”, everyday people can be dam trolls, checking your spelling, and because every account has to be opened and set up by someone. There were no requirements that a person’s name, in fact there were separate boxes, so people did not have to be their stage name, or virtual name. Rod did not use or explore Facebook much longer after he left the social media class in 2011. He assumed their accounts have to be set up by a human so none of them could be fake either. In one Virtual Community, 170 Russians accounts, reached about 20 million people. There is not anything fake or illegal about this. Maybe, there need to be laws passed dealing with the Virtual World and Internet from people who understand new technology before people call fake and illegal because they do not understand or like the results and outcomes of and election. A Virtual Community having 3,814 accounts are not really anything suspicious in building a Virtual Community reaching 1.4 million people. 50,258 automated bots tweeting about the election information drawing traffic to a Twitter community, A Russian built American Virtual World Community, attempting to drive add sales is clever, but does not seem illegal in the Virtual World. Maybe the financial aspects or using fake social security numbers in PayPal would be illegal; but not the act of having a Virtual Community in Cyber World. You have a 23-year-old kid making $1000 a month working for the Internet Research Agency spending $100,000 on advertising; so money was an issue. Many Americans and people around the world do not have the educational skills to build such Virtual Communities so this company may have thought it was providing a good service to Americans for getting election information, and other information fast. That is what Twitters want, fast information. So using Virtual Communities and bots to accomplish this, tweeting 16, 634 tweets in day or 6, 860 another day on the chart they gave is nothing spectacular. The spectacular thing is that the primary goal of this company by the evidence was to make money and not as there, “Agreement Statement” for conspiracy was not to just effect the election but be one of the best virtual communities at what they built, an American Virtual Political Community built in Russia by two points: during the month before the election their tweets were less than the past three months before the election and after the election they still maintained tweeting even though Hillary lost; so the reason for tweeting seem to support it was not targeted at just the election and spreading bad opinion’s about Hillary Clinton. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
Inferior on a subject such as Virtual Communities and the way they are designed, and given inferior word terminology and information leads to false premises, false analysis, and false conclusions to investigation which may lead to false prosecution on bad evidence.
But, I think they were rightfully shut down; they pleaded not guilty, so I can’t comment about the allegation of using fake social security numbers; but for the fact, like I wrote in the other article prior to this one, that I will copy and paste next, they were promoting acts of violence and trying to form flash mobs, Virtual or physical location. (Shane, Scott, and Mark Mazzetti).
Rod believes Twitter and Facebook failed to act in the anger at Charlottesville, Virginia which left one dead and many injured. Rod believe that Twitter and Facebook failed to act in Colin Kaepernick kneeling angry protest in the first two weeks which he believes was a subsequent cause to the Las Vegas shooting. Differently Rod responsible shut his list down for two weeks so no one could communicate during the peak of the anger from the kneeling and media sensationalism of it. At least Facebook should be able to foresee the causation of angry "flash-mobs" that show up in cyberspace especially when their sister "flash-mob" has shown up in person physically on ground locations; examples are the overthrow of Egypt, Libya, and Syria. One, the Arab Spring, which Zuckenberg Facebook was alleged to be involved in. He downplayed it. 2012, Chen, Adrian. “Mark Zuckerberg Takes Credit for Populist Revolutions Now That Facebook's Gone Public.” 02/02/2012 Gawker, gawker.com/5881657/facebook-takes-credit-for-populist-revolutions-now-that-its-gone-public When Rod saw the people attempt to gather in an angry manner, he pulled the plug on their activity, for America not to be overthrown by this anger, coordinated with live physical on ground "flash-mobs" they, Congress, Justice Department, or Supreme Court by suit, will have to require social media to pull the plug when these angry "flash-mobs" form; even if it is at the highest level, Hillary Clinton, President Obama, Labron James, or even the President of the United States, or Middle East, or European Union, Russia, or China may be involved. This is not interfering with free speech coupled with violent "flash-mobs" whether virtual or on the ground; they are not guaranteed speech, no more than falsely yelling "fire" in a crowded movie theater. It really is not about spreading descent and discourse from other countries that is the major threat for America Politics and Elections. It is not Russia, maybe Iran, in Congress and America saying that they hate America, pledge, and flag. It is not Russian boycotting and picketing American Holidays like Christmas. It is not Russia desecrating the American Flag, they showed it respect at the Olympics. More on this issue coming. Rod was taught about forming "flash mobs" in Journalism, but it was taught as people gathering to do dance duo(s), I don't think that is really why media studies people are taught how to form "flash-mobs" what the heck is a "flash mob." Dancing is great, but when Bill Clinton was in office, a "flash mob" gathered in Rwanda full of anger and murdered one million people before it was stopped over a 3-month period.
“Is It Illegal to Yell ‘Fire’ in a Crowded Theatre?” Law Stack Exchange, law.stackexchange.com/questions/28853/is-it-illegal-to-yell-fire-in-a-crowded-theatre "Law The origin of the phrase is from the Supreme Court of the United States in the case Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919). It specifically rules on the limitation of freedom of speech (first amendment): The original ruling is this: The most stringent protection of free speech would not protect a man in falsely shouting fire in a theatre and causing a panic. [...] The question in every case is whether the words used are used in such circumstances and are of such a nature as to create a clear and present danger that they will bring about the substantive evils that Congress has a right to prevent. As pointed out by @phoog, this does not say anything about the lawfulness of shouting "fire", it says that if your speech creates a clear and present danger, the first amendment will not protect you, even if the danger does not result in actual harm."
Twitter CEO spoke that he believes that Twitter is the proper place to have all types of dialogue. Rod and he are in agreement. Some subjects are rude, not nice, insulting, sensitive, but need to be able to be talked about in such places like Rod's research and educational sites. If no one talks, the problems still do not go away, but are left misunderstood as inferior. And we cannot walk through life blind and inferior. So Rod's policy is that as long as you are not angry, you are welcome to his blog, or have been welcomed to his past works, to explore different thoughts of different people. But, this privilege to explore does not give you right to try to change a person with different thoughts from you. He will write more on this issue.
Rod made one more appearance after his retirement, Addendum Timeline Annotated, when he saw the Time Line, somebody leaked it to New York Times September 20, 2018, Conspiracy Hoax, and full of fake news, yes it is a Hoax, they call people's differences of opinions fake, folks, an opinion is not fake news because you disagree, even the front page, the one eye, stands for Globalism, Trump and Putin are not Globalist, they both are anti-globalist, and it better supports Rod's theory over the last two years. Why is You Tube framing a lot of American musicians with one eye, is it not to frame them in New York Times conspiracy theory, why was not Wikileaks removed from Twitter before the 2016 Election, removed Alex Jones in a couple hours for violating policies, is it not left up to Frame Americans, who connect to a tweet, or hashtag, or direct message someone, very shaky precedents being set by owners of social media working with the government, to create conspiracies. He'll wait after the hearing next Monday with the Supreme Court to give final remarks on both. Yes, Rod's opinion is that Trump would be a fool to have an interview. Tape-recordings, witness corroborating stories, fabricating false testimony, planting evidence, manufacturing or fabricating evidence, fake news and spreading discourse, where people call "suggestive review answers and opinions," a term used by business leaders as an investigative tool on an issue used in The Scientific World Journal called lies and fake news by not so business journalist each night on television, the two, term fake news, probably not admissible into a court of competence as a definable legal term, entrapment, framing, lies, secret bugs maybe, wires tapes maybe, rewarded (pay-to-play) admitted felons, phone tapes maybe, hidden secret tape recordings on people, threats of arrest, he may want to wait until after he is charged to disprove the charges. The opinion is not fake. I mean what thousand things could any person get wrong; or contradictory evidence possible fabricated after one testifies where there has been any signs of bias, hostility, and corruption by investigators (leaking, conspiracy, lying, hiding exculpatory evidence, that will come out in criminal discover). But, Rod is not a lawyer, and not connected to Trump Campaign, MANGA, and not part of any Russian conspiracies. He never talked to any Russians.
Alternate Proximate Cause of Hillary Clinton losing 2016 Election.
Hillary Clinton cheating DNC question was no substantial new information that changed very little opinion over her past habits. The email theft was very irrelevant to the outcome. Did many people even know Podesta and even less would care about what he said in a personal email. There is no way to prove that in court except speculation, rumor, gossip, hearsay, conjecture which are all hearsay and may not be admissible in any competent court of law.
Criminal Law, Concepts and Practice, Second Edition, Carolina Academic Press, Authored by Ellen S. Podger, Peter J. Henning, Andrew E. Taslitz, and Alfredoo Garcia. (Podger, Henning, Taslitz, and Garcia).

References: § 2
 V. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.