Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Particular-relations-a-Landlord-and-tenant-Part-3.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 10:29:21+00:00

Document:
Philips v. Rothwell, 4 Bibb. (Ky.) 33; Millett v. Lagomdrsino, 107 Cal. 102, 38 Pac. 308; Gee v. Hatley, 114 Ark. 376, 170 S. W. 72; editorial notes 9 Columbia Law Rev. 461, 22 Harvard Law Rev. 604; 7 Mich Law Rev 592.
88a. Frazer v. Naylor, 1 Mete, (Ky.) 593; Neilson v Qrignon, 85 Wis.550. 56 N. W. 890.
In the case of a constructive trust, which is recognized by a court of equity for the purpose of relief against fraud,93 the possession of the holder of the legal title is ordinarily adverse to the person who v. Hall, 73 Miss. 509, 19 So. 348; Carson v. Broady, 56 Neb. 648, 71 Am. St. Rep. 691, 77 N. W. 80; Jackson v. Cams, 20 Johns. (N. Y.) 301; Taylor v. Kelly, 3 Jones Eq. (56 N. Car.) 240; Leport v. Todd, 32 N. J. L. 124; Nessley v. Ladd, 29 Ore. 354, 45 Pac. 904; Whaley v. Whaley, 1 Speer Law (S. C.) 225. 40 Am. Dec. 594; Brandon v. Bannon, 38 Pa. 63; Duke v. Harper, 6 Yerg. (Tenn.) 280, 27 Am. Dec. 462; Flannagan v. Pearson, 61 Tex. 302; Fahey v. Kaies - Tex. Civ. - , 181 S. W. 782; Sherman v. Champlain Transportation Co., 31 Vt. 162; Emerick v. Tavener, 9 Gratt. (Va.) 220, 58 Am. Dec. 217; Swann v. Young, 36 W. Va. 57, 14 S. E. 426.
In New York the statute provides that the holding of a tenant shall not be adverse till twenty years after the expiration of the term. See Whiting v. Edmunds, 94 N. Y. 309.
91. Seymour v. Freer, 8 Wall. (U. S.i 202. 19 L. Ed. 306; Cruse v. Kidd, 195 Ala. 22, 70 So. 166; Watson v. Sutro, 86 Cal. 500, 24 Pac. 172, 25 Pac. 64; Meacham v. Bunting, 156 111. 586, 47 Am. St. Rep. 239, 28 L. R. A. 618; Dunn v. Wheeler, 86 Me. 238, 29 Atl. 985; Hatt v. Green, 180 Mich. 383, 147 N. W. 593; Kane v. Bloodgood, 7 Johns. Ch. 125; Miller v. Bingham, 36 N. C. 423, 36 Am. Dec. 58; Williams v. First Presbyterian Soc. in Cincinnati, 1 Ohio St. 478; Smith v. Mcelyea, 68 Tex. 70, 3 S. W. 258; Redford v. Clarke, 100 Va. 115, 40 S. E. 630.
92. Willison v. Watkins, 3 Pet. 42, 52; Schlessinger v. Mallard, 70 Cal. 326, 11 Pac. 728; Terry v. Davenport, 185 Ind. 561, 112 N. E. 998; Mcguire v. Nugent, 103 Mo. 161, 15 S. W. 551; Stanton v. Helm, 87 Miss. 287, 39 So. 457; Lamberton v. Youmans, 84 Minn. 109, 86 N. W. 894; Congregational Soc. etc. v. Newing-ton, 53 N. H. 595; Boydstun v. Jacobs, 38 Nev. 175, 147 Pac. 447; Williams v. Cincinnati First Presby. Church, 1 Ohio St. 478; Long v. Cason, 4 Rich. Eq. 60; Fennell v. Loague, 107 Tenn. 239, 63 S. W. 1121.
To what extent, in the case of a resulting trust. that is, a trust implied in accordance with presumed intention,97 the possession of the trustee is to be regarded as adverse or not adverse to the person beneficially entitled, the cases are not entirely clear. It has been decided in a number of cases that, when the trust resulted from the payment of a consideration by one person for property conveyed to another, the possession of the latter was not adverse to the person making the payment until there was an explicit re pudiation of the trust, reference being made, however, in some of these cases, to the fact that the circumstances showed an acknowledgment by the former of the existence of a trust.98 When the title is taken in the other's name with a fraudulent intention on the part of such other, the trust is to be regarded as a constructive rather than a resulting trust, and the statute would run at least from the time of the discovery of the fraud."
94. Lewis v. Hawkins, 23 Wall. 119; Hunter v. Dennis, 112 111. 568, Terry v. Davenport, 185 Ind. 561, 112 N. E. 998; Kennedy v. Kennedy, 25 Kan. 151; Edwards v. University, 21 N. C. 325. 30 Am. Dec. 170; Church v. Winton, 196 Pa. St. 107. 46 Atl. 363.
95. Odell v. .Moss. 130 Cal.
62 Pac. 555; Carr v. Craig, L38 Iowa, 526, 116 N. W. 720; Newts v. Topfer, 121 Iowa, 133, 96 V W. 905.
96. Markley v. Camden Safe Deposit & Trust Co., 74 N. J. Eq 279. 69 Atl. 1100.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.