Source: https://chestofbooks.com/business/law/Handbook-Law-Of-Contracts/Waiver-And-Acquiescence-In-Breach-Of-Condition.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 23:06:57+00:00

Document:
Iron Works, 181 U. S. 453, 21 Sup. Ct. 680, 45 L. Ed. 948. See "Contracts;" Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 221; Cent. Dig. §§ 1015-1032.
40 Behn v. Burness, 3 Best & S. 756; Graves v. Legg, 9 Exch. 709; Pust v. Dowie, Law J. 32 Q. B. 179; Phillips & Colby Const. Co. v. Seymour, 91 U. S. 646, 23 L. Ed. 341; Wiley v. Inhabitants of Athol, 150 Mass. 426, 23 N. E. 311, 6 L. R. A. 342; Sykes v. City of St. Cloud, 60 Minn. 442, 62 N. W. 613; Young Bros. Mach. Co. v. Young, 111 Mich. 118, 69 N. W. 152; Charley v. Potthoff, 118 Wis. 258, 95 N. W. 124; Carter v. Scargill, L. R. 10 Q. B. 564; Bechtel v. Cone, 52 Md. 698; Foley v. Crow, 37 Md. 51. See "Contracts," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 316; Cent. Dig. §§ 11,80-11,92.
41 Wiley v. Inhabitants of Athol, 150 Mass. 426, 23 N. E. 311, 6 L. R. A 342, per Field, J. See "Contracts" Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 316; Cent. Dig. §§ 1480-1492.
42 Pust v. Dowie, Law J. 32 Q. B. 179. See "Contracts," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 316; Cent. Dig. §§ 1480-1491. 43 Ante, p. 580.
44Bagley v. Rolling-Mill Co. (C. C.) 21 Fed. 159; English v. Commission Co. (C. C.) 48 Fed. 197; Id., 6 C. C. A. 416, 57 Fed. 451; Reynolds v. Palmer (C. C.) 21 Fed. 433; Wolcott v. Mount, 36 N. J. Law, 262, 13 Am. Rep. 438; Holloway v. Jacoby, 120 Pa. 583, 15 Atl. 487, 6 Am. St Rep. 737; Lewis v. Rountree, 78 N. C. 323; Eagan Co. v. Johnson, 82 Ala. 233, 2 South. 302; Dayton v. Hooglnnd, 39 Ohio St. 671; Morse v. Moore, 83 Me. 473, 22 Atl. 862, 13 L. R. A. 224, 23 Am. St. Rep. 783; Tacoma Coal Co. v. Bradley, 2 Wash. 600, 27 Pac. 454, 26 Am. St. Rep. 890. See, also, Marsh v. McPherson, 105 U. S. 709, 26 L. Ed. 1139. See "Sales," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) §§ 116, 179; Cent. Dig. §§ 436-444, 456-468.
45Haase v. Nonnemacher, 21 Minn. 486; Maxwell v. Lee, 34 Minn. 511, 27 N. W. 196; Thompson v. Libby, 35 Minn. 443, 29 N. W. 150 (implied condition of merchantableness does not survive acceptance in respect to visible defects); Comstock v. Sanger, 51 Mich. 497, 16 N. W. 872; McClure v. Jefferson, 85 Wis. 208, 54 N. W. 777. This rule prevails in New York, Coplay Iron Co. v. Pope, 108 N. Y. 232, 15 N. E. 335; except as to a warranty that goods shall conform to sample. Zabriskie v. Railroad Co., 131 N. Y. 72, 29 N. E. 1006. See "Sales," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 276; Cent. Dig. §§ 486-444.
46 Anson, Cont (4th Ed.) 308, citing Ellen v. Topp, 6 Exch. 424. See "Con-tracts," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § S16; Cent. Dig. §§ 1480-1491; "Sales," Dec Dig. (Key-No.) §§ 176, 179; Cent. Dig. §§ 436-444, 456-468.

References: § 221
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 316
 v. 
 § 316
 v. 
 § 316
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 276
 v.