Source: https://www.iejme.com/article/alienation-of-personality-in-higher-education
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 13:42:59+00:00

Document:
Reference: Afanasyev PN, Sharaj TP. Alienation of Personality in Higher Education. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(4), 623-631.
Reference: Afanasyev, P. N., & Sharaj, T. P. (2016). Alienation of Personality in Higher Education. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(4), 623-631.
Reference: Afanasyev, Pavel N., and Tatyana P. Sharaj. "Alienation of Personality in Higher Education". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2016 11 no. 4 (2016): 623-631.
Reference: Afanasyev, P. N., and Sharaj, T. P. (2016). Alienation of Personality in Higher Education. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(4), pp. 623-631.
Reference: Afanasyev, Pavel N. et al. "Alienation of Personality in Higher Education". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 4, 2016, pp. 623-631.
Reference: Afanasyev PN, Sharaj TP. Alienation of Personality in Higher Education. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(4):623-1.
The problem of alienation of personality in the learning process is common for all the education levels in our country and abroad. In this connection, it is becoming increasingly important to identify its causes and the ways to overcome them. The article presents a complex vision of the phenomenon of alienation of personality in the field of higher education in modern Russian society from the philosophical, sociological, psychological and pedagogical positions. The general approach we chose when considering the phenomenon of alienation in the field of higher education is the activity approach which is well-developed by Russian researchers and examines the social subject as an active actor included in the actual system of social relations. Within the framework of empirical research conducted in the phenomenological tradition, the subjective experience of the individual in the system of higher education and the individual-personal side of the objective social reality is represented. In the article the factors affecting the alienation reproduction in the higher education learning process are revealed; the characteristics of the traditional approach in teaching, contributing to alienation are shown; the basic forms of alienation of high school students are highlighted; the most formulized and most established subjectivizing practices in higher education are described; the basic elements of subjectivizing social practices are formulated. The identified social practices of alienation overcoming may be directly used in the education process in higher school. Also, the main results of the study can be used in working-out the concept of specialists training in the system of higher education.
Blauner R. (1964). Alienation and freedom. The factory worker and his industry. Chicago. 323 p.
Coombs F. (1970) The crisis of education in the modern world. System analysis. Moscow: Progress. 264 p.
Freire P. (1972). Education: the practice of freedom. London: Writers and Readers Publishing Cooperative. 299p.
Fromm E. (1992). The human soul. Moscow: Republic. 430p.
Habermas, J. (1993). The relationship between the system and the life in the world at the conditions, the set of late capitalism. Thesis, 2, 123-136.
Hegel G. (1977). Encyclopedia of philosophy. Vol.3. The philosophy of the spirit. Moscow: Thought. 471p.
Horney K. (1993). The neurotic personality of our time. Introspection. Moscow: Progress Publishing "Universe". 480p.
Hvedchenya L. V. (2014). The nature of the crisis in modern education. Sociology, 1, 78-86.
Illich I. (1971). Deschooling Society. New York: Harper & Row. 160p.
Kon I. S. (1984). In search of personality and its identity. Moscow: Politizdat. 380p.
Kosirev V. N. (2009). Alienated of school students work. Higher education in Russia, 11, 138-143.
Kudryavtseva E. V. (2011). Psychological characteristics of students with different forms of alienation. Vestnik Tambov university. Humanities series, 5(97), 172-176.
Lukash O. (2013). Psychological ideas about positive alternatives to the alienation of man. Cultural-historical psychology, 1, 62-70.
Marcel G. (1994). To be and to have. Novocherkassk: Agency SAGUNA. 158p.
Marx K. (2000). Sociology: a collection. Moscow: "Canon-press-c", "A handful of in the field". 432p.
Mills C.R. (2001). Sociological imagination. Moscow: Publishing House NOTA BENE. 264p.
Niyazbaeva N. N. (2010). The existential foundation of alienation of the individual in pedagogical interaction. World of science, culture, education, 5, 80-82.
Osin E. N. (2015). Category alienation in educational psychology: history and prospects. Cultural-historical psychology, 11(4), 79-88.
Panteleyeva O. D. (2013). Psychological analysis problems occur during the field training work. Journal of Tambov university. Humanities series, 4(120), 219-223.
Perminova L. M, Yakovlev N. I, Perminov V. L. (2012). Education in times of crisis: the XXI century. Moscow: Moscow institute of open education. 150p.
Richardson, G. (1997). Education for freedom. Moscow: RSUH. 211p.
Rogers K., Freiberg D. (2002). The freedom to learn. Moscow: Meaning. 527p.
Rozin V. M. (2013). The crisis of pedagogy knowledge and the formation of a new educational formation. World of psychology, 3, 66-82.
Rubinstein S. L. (2003). Being and consciousness. Man and the world. St.Petersburg: Peter. 512p.
Simmel G. (1950). The metropolis and mental life. Trans. by k. Wolff. N.Y.: Free Press. 225p.
Timchenko L. L. (2009). The problem of alienation in Russian education. Philosophy of education, 1, 19-26.
Vakayev V. A. (2013). The phenomenon of alienation in higher education. Journal of the Altai academy of economics and law, 4, 121-123.
Weber M. (1990). Selected works. Moscow: Progress. 808p.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.