Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/100408.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 02:34:58+00:00

Document:
COOPER TIRE: Court Approves $7.05 Million Settlement in "Cates"
COSTCO WHOLESALE: Continues to Defend "Salmon" Suit in Calif.
COSTCO WHOLESALE: Awaits Settlement Final Approval in "Williams"
CUMULUS MEDIA: Overtime Lawsuit Removed to N.D. Calif.
WEBMD HEALTH: Subsidiaries Face TCPA-Violations Lawsuit in Conn.
to the company's March 2, 2010, Form 10-K filing with the U.S.
between Feb. 8, 2007 and Oct. 23, 2007.
of Electrical Workers Local 351 as lead plaintiff.
complaint on Jan. 11, 2010.
artificially inflating the price of the company's Common Stock.
for damages," the Company says.
accredited travel study and distance learning school.
than twice as fast as they should.
Browne, et al. v. American Honda Motor Co., Inc., Case No.
to the vehicle's rear wheels."
brakes would require such frequent repairs.
system that became standard on the 2008 Accord and 2009 TSX.
add more to the front."
who is one of the lawyers who filed the case.
owner complaints about the issue on its Web site.
of the miles I put on this particular car have been expressway.
dumbfounded," he said in an interview.
Honda. They have been great cars."
consider final approval later this year.
sometimes included the brake rotors being smoothed out.
$150 to have the new, redesigned brake pads installed.
guarantee that consumers would get more after a trial.
defective, are extraordinarily difficult to prove and to win,"
those from Berk Law of Washington.
its directors and certain of its current and former officers.
Action has not received court approval.
subject to final settlement documentation and court approval.
Reporter on Aug. 27 and 31, 2009.
Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended Jan. 3, 2010.
Code and the California Business and Professions Code.
costs; and injunctive and declaratory relief.
motion to preliminarily approve the settlement with the court.
settlement accrual recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.
settlement and release of all claims related to the lawsuit.
subsidiary of Big 5 Corp.
A class action lawsuit was filed on Sept. 29, 2008, in the U.S.
Fraud Act claims on behalf of Illinois consumers.
in the name of a different plaintiff.
a pending motion to dismiss the first case.
for failure to adequately allege damages.
The appeals have been consolidated and fully briefed.
arguments before the Seventh Circuit.
complete on October 22, 2009.
entitled Mylroie v. Carter's, Inc., No. 1:09-CV-3196-JOF.
offered to some wholesale customers.
the Lead Plaintiff in the Consolidated Action.
the fiscal year ended Jan. 2, 2010.
approved the settlement agreement in the matter Cates, et al v.
benefits upon certain company hourly retirees.
Johnson, et al v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company, was filed on Feb.
pending the parties' settlement discussions.
intended to resolve all related claims for these matters.
members to the proposed settlement agreement was Dec. 10, 2009.
lawsuit, Johnson, et al v. Cooper Tire & Rubber Company.
A class certification motion by the plaintiff's in Drenckhahn v.
The suit principally alleges denial of overtime compensation.
An answer to the complaint was filed on May 27, 2008.
for the quarter ended Feb. 14, 2010.
an "Unpaid Wage Class" and a "Wage Statement Class."
dismissing with prejudice the wage-itemization claims.
Drenckhahn v. Costco Wholesale Corp., Case No. 08-cv-01408 (C.D.
the company's March 17, 2010, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
The suit is George v. Costco Wholesale Corp., Case No.
records, and willfully failed to pay termination wages.
company's March 17, 2010, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
The suit was filed on Oct. 28, 2009 and is styled Jade Jue v.
Costco Wholesale Corp., San Mateo County Superior Court, Case No.
still await a decision from the Ninth Circuit.
the district court on Jan. 11, 2007.
certification. The appeal was argued on April 14, 2008.
with a membership renewal practice.
the time of the late payment.
interest and, in Evans, punitive damages.
year's expiration date rather than the date of payment.
attorneys' fees to class counsel in an amount up to $5 million.
counsel, and certain expenses of settlement administration.
Costco Wholesale Corp. is awaiting final approval from the U.S.
quarter ended Feb. 14, 2010.
energy equivalent received by the consumer.
Case No. 07-1754 (S.D. Cal.).
the actions in which it is named as a defendant.
not provide for cash payments to class members.
the quarter ended Feb. 14, 2010.
actions relating to sales of organic milk.
Aurora Dairy Corp. was improperly labeled "organic."
Plaintiffs filed a consolidated complaint on July 18, 2008.
classes of people who purchased Costco organic milk.
unspecified amounts, as well as costs and attorneys' fees.
prejudice, among others, all claims against the company.
Plaintiffs have appealed the dismissal.
Angeles Superior Court Case No. JCCP No. 4329.
requiring farm-raised salmon to be labeled as "color added."
allegedly improper disclosures, and costs and attorneys' fees.
by the California Supreme Court.
The company has denied the material allegations of the complaint.
preliminary injunction seeking to prevent Costco Wholesale Corp.
from the accompanying cocktail sauce, lettuce, and lemon wedges.
the County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC-399302.
deny them statutorily guaranteed meal periods and rest breaks.
to dismiss was partially granted.
certification, and that ruling has been appealed.
employees to be locked in the warehouses.
The suit was filed on Nov. 9, 2009, in the State of Washington.
the matter Scott M. Williams v. Costco Wholesale Corp., U.S.
properly compensated for overtime work.
County of Los Angeles, Case No. BC-296369.
was finalized by the court on May 13, 2008.
was substantially paid in the first quarter of 2010.
Los Angeles, Case No. BC-409805.
summary judgment, and that ruling has been appealed.
poster boy for the subprime mortgage crisis.
to disseminate the personal information."
they finally did admit it.
financial stress [they] had created."
Countrywide agents, employees or other individuals."
done to the credit of its customers."
aiding and abetting, and punitive damages.
Brian Mas, on behalf of himself and other similarly situated v.
Cumulus Media, Inc., et al., Case No. RG10494862 (Calif. Super.
currently employed as "account executives" by Cumulus Media.
No. 10-cv-01396 to the proceeding.
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended Jan. 23, 2010.
County, Ohio or the Delaware Court of Chancery.
Barn, and its chief executive officer.
2009, naming as defendants only Tween Brands and its directors.
Dress Barn, and Merger Sub.
2009, naming the same defendants as plaintiff Dutiel.
Dress Barn or its chief executive officer as defendants.
adequate consideration for the merger.
The parties have engaged in initial discovery proceedings.
plaintiffs and lead counsel for plaintiffs.
operated 1,559 stores in 48 states and the District of Columbia.
and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended Jan. 23, 2010.
Tween Brands is a subsidiary of Dress Barn.
All three cases were consolidated in California state court.
Commission for the quarter ended Jan. 23, 2010.
for overtime and missed rest breaks.
Brands is investigating the claims made in the lawsuit.
Hertz Corp.'s March 2, 2010, Form 10-K filing with the U.S.
HERC is Hertz Corp.'s wholly owned equipment rental subsidiary.
another plaintiff, Miguel V. Pro, and more claims.
and claim that the charges violate the Uniform Commercial Code.
summary judgment and the case is in the discovery stage.
Spain, and China, as well as through international licensees.
company's March 2, 2010, Form 10-K filing with the U.S.
filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada.
airport fees that are alleged not to be allowed by Nevada law.
The complaint also seeks attorneys' fees and costs.
motions are now before the court awaiting a decision.
the District Court of Wyandotte County, Kansas.
Group, Inc., another Telephone Consumer Protection Act case.
airports located in California after Jan. 1, 2007.
except for the federal antitrust claim.
federal antitrust claim, is in the discovery stage.
the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California.
Assessment Program in California on Jan. 1, 2007.
and Tourism Commission, and Dale E. Bonner.
Marcus wrote for the Atlanta-based panel.
Jakarta Legal Aid Institute said.
plaintiffs. We need about 10 people as principals," he went on.
ministerial regulation on guide to formulating spatial planning.
remove the deliberation of the spatial planning from its agenda.
bylaws to be passed this year.
wider public participation," Irvan said.
of the Superior Court of Rockingham County, N.C.
similarly situated v. Sony Corporation, et al., Case No.
Coverage of Slavin v. Sony Optiarc, Inc., et al., Case No.
in the Class Action Reporter on Tues., Apr. 6, 2010.
letting it stand as legal precedent in the State of California.
battle is far from over.
of a key test case at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in 2007.
Even though the special master in the case ruled against her, Ms.
Cedillo said, "I am optimistic. We have met our burden."
"vaccine court" system Congress devised in 1986.
system, and the high court will decide when that can happen.
system hasn't worked the way it was supposed to work at all,"
out the program is a disaster."
vaccines containing mercury caused Michelle's disabilities.
compensation because she was a messenger," Mr. Homer wrote.
also on appeal at the Federal Circuit.
New York, County of New York.
al., No. 650369/2009 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N.Y. Cty.).
the company; and HLTH Corp.
discontinuance, which concluded the matter.
the users and approximately 98% of the page views.
of Connecticut against subsidiaries of the company.
recently begun in the action.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 V. 
 v. 
 v.