Source: http://gastro.zaslavsky.com.ua/article/view/81485
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 20:53:06+00:00

Document:
24-hour esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance (MII)-pH-monitoring is the most accurate method for detecting abnormal gastroesophageal reflux in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease and other conditions. However, some investigators have found that short-duration conventional pH-monitoring in the postprandial phase is also useful, but it has not been proven for MII-pH-monitoring.
Objective: to assess diagnostic capability of 200-minute postprandial MII-pH-monitoring compared to 24-hour study.
Materials and Methods. Patients were divided into 2 groups: the 1st(gastroesophageal reflux disease) — 6 women and 9 men, mean age (M ± m) was 44.8 ± 4.2 years; the 2nd (functional dyspepsia) — 6 women and 7 men, mean age was 49.2 ± 3.9 years. We have separately analyzed the data of 200 minutes of the study and the data from the entire 24-hour period. The test period included 45 min before provocative standardized breakfast (507 kcal) and 140 min after.
Results. The correlation between the results of both studies was strong: for the number of acid refluxes — r = 0.88 (95% confident interval (CI) 0.76–0.95; p < 0.0001); for the total number of refluxes — r = 0.82 (95% CI 0.64–0.92; p < 0.0001). For the time when pH < 4, the correlation was slightly worse — r = 0.69 (95% CI 0.41–0.85; p < 0.0001). The normal reflux number was calculated by means of ROC-curve. The reflux was considered as abnormal when the number of acid refluxes > 6 episodes for 200 minutes and > 40 for 24-hour period, the total number of refluxes > 17 episodes for 200 minutes and > 74 for 24-hour period.
Conclusion. In general, our results indicate that the 200-minute study can be fully utilized to quantify gastroesophageal reflux.
Бордин Д.С. Методика проведения и клиническое значение импеданс-рН-мониторинга : метод. рекомендации / Д.С. Бордин, О.Б. Янова, Э.Р. Валитова. — М. : ИД «Медпрактика-М». — 2013. — C. 27.
Мелащенко С.Г. Дослідження гастроезофагеального рефлюксу за допомогою багатогодинного МІІ-рН-М стравоходу та шлунка у хворих на функціональну шлункову диспепсію та НЕРХ / С.Г. Мелащенко, В.М. Чернобровий, О.І. Морозова // Гастроентерологія. — 2010. — Т. 44. — С. 329-333.
Трухманов А.С. рН-импедансометрия пищевода. Пособие для врачей / А.С. Трухманов, В.О. Кайбышева ; Под ред. акад. РАМН, проф. В.Т. Ивашкина. — М. : ИД «Медпрактика-М», 2013. — C. 32.
Пат. 13105 Україна, МПК (2006). Спосіб експрес-діагностики та контролю лікування гастроезофагеальної рефлюксної хвороби / Чернобровий В.М., Колісник С.П., Заїка С.В. ; опубл. 15.03.06, Бюл. № 3. — 6 с.
Comparative study of two modes of gastroesophageal reflux measuring: conventional esophageal pH monitoring and wireless pH monitoring / R.S. Azzam, R.A. Sallum, J.F. Brandão [et al.] // Arq. Gastroenterol. — 2012. — V. 49, № 2. — P. 107-112.
Addition of esophageal impedance monitoring to pH monitoring increases the yield of symptom association analysis in patients off PPI therapy / A.J. Bredenoord, B.L. Weusten [et al.] // Am. J. Gastroenterol. — 2006. — V. 101, № 3. — P. 453-459.
24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring / B. Chander, N. Hanley-Williams, Y. Deng, A. Sheth // J. Clin. Gastroenterol. — 2012. — V. 46, № 3. — P. 197-200.
A simplified method of esophageal pH monitoring for assessment of gastroesophageal reflux / Choiniere L., L. Miller [et al.] // Thorac. Surg. — 1983. — V. 36. — P. 596-603.
Inclusion of supine period in short-duration pH monitoring is essential in diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease // Dig. Dis. Sci. — 1996. — V. 41, № 4. — P. 764-772.
Hershcovici T. Comparison of distribution of intraesophageal pH during nighttime recumbency among patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease / T. Hershcovici, L.K. Jha, R. Fass // J. Clin. Gastroenterol. — 2012. — V. 46, № 7. — P. 562-566.
Hirano I. ACG practice guidelines: esophageal reflux tes­ting / I. Hirano, J.E. Richter // Am. J. Gastroenterol. — 2007. — V. 102. — P. 668-685.
The utility of intraluminal impedance in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease-like symptoms but normal endoscopy and 24-hour pH testing / M.M. Kline, M. Ewing, N. Simpson, L. Laine // Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. — 2008. — V. 6, № 8. — P. 880-885.
Long J.D. Nonerosive reflux disease / J.D. Long, R.C. Orlando // Minerva Gastroenterol. Dietol. — 2007. — V. 53, № 2. — P. 127-141.
Ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring using a wireless system / J.E. Pandolfino, J.E. Richter [et al.] // Am. J. Gastroente­rol. — 2003. — V. 98. — P. 740-749.
Effects of a 5-HT(4) receptor agonist on oesophageal function and gastro-oesophageal reflux: studies using combined impedance-manometry and combined impedance-pH / R. Tutuian, I. Mainie [et al.] // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. — 2006. — V. 24, № 1. — P. 155-162.
Simultaneous recordings of oesophageal acid exposure with conventional pH monitoring and a wireless system (Bravo) / S.B. Varannes, F. Mion, P. Ducrotté [et al.] // Gut. — 2005. — V. 54, № 12. — P. 1682-1686.
Feasibility and tolerability of transnasal/peroral placement of the wireless pH capsule vs. traditional 24-h oesophageal pH monitoring — a randomized trial / W.M. Wong, J. Bautista [et al.] // Aliment. Pharmacol. Ther. — 2005. — V. 21, № 2. — P. 155-163.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.