Source: http://www.legalgist.com/mccarley-kfc-important
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 09:59:40+00:00

Document:
Q: What is McCarley v. KFC and why is it important?
This court reaffirmed Byrd, but then say that since the movant failed to prove that the chicken was not contaminated, no summary judgment granted. The Supreme court allowed a lay person’s testimony to prove causation. This is not true in medical malpractice cases – there, it must be an expert testimony. The opinion actually stated that this would not be the case in med malpractice cases; this made the medical malpractice community angry, so they had to remove it from the opinion.
What's Your Answer to "What is McCarley v. KFC and why is it important?"
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Civil Procedure Cases and are similar to What is McCarley v. KFC and why is it important?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What were the facts in the case Morgan v. Compugraphic Corporation?
What happened in the case Hernandez v. Altenberg?
Give me a brief on Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.
Explain the different Expert Witnesses.
In the case Laub v. Justice, here is what happened.
What happened in the case Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals?
In the case Camp v. Harris Methodist Fort Worth Hospital, here is what happened.
What does the case MacGregor v. Campbell talk about?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.