Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/080909.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 14:22:37+00:00

Document:
CENTERLINE HOLDING: Securities Fraud Suit Still Pending in N.Y.
HANARO TELECOM: Faces Suit After Chief Sold 6-Mln. Private Info.
SEMGROUP ENERGY: Murray Frank Files Securities Lawsuit in N.Y.
unlawful conduct" relating to the OrthoClear Settlement.
pending litigation between the parties.
charge to patients or their doctors.
Technology for breach of contract.
promised treatment to Plaintiff or any of the Class Members."
of Action (the only cause of action alleged against Align).
awaiting rulings from the Court.
The suit is "Weber v. Align Technology, Inc., et al., Case No.
two former executives, Thomson Financial News reports.
through and including June 29, 2003.
On June 30, 2003, Alstom disclosed that its wholly owned U.S.
lead counsel for the class in this action.
the lead plaintiffs opposed this request.
prosecute the case towards trial.
adequately alleges claims under Section 10(b) of the U.S.
guarantees of cruise ship purchasers' loans.
Judge Marrero denied the motions to dismiss on Sept. 29, 2006.
go forward against Alstom SA and the two former executives.
former executives and U.S. subsidiaries.
resolution of several similar cases filed against the company.
them as well as injunctive relief against all defendants.
the company by allegedly violating the federal securities laws.
trustees and The Related Companies L.P. in the U.S.
7. "Kostecka v. Schnitzer et al., Index No. 601044-08,"
and its board of trustees, in the New York Supreme Court.
in any of those cases.
which is subject to court approval.
on May 23, 2008, and a second hearing was held on July 15, 2008.
-- "Goldstein v. Centerline Holding Company, et al., No.
-- "Weinrib v. Centerline Holding Company, et al., No.
-- "Dechter v. Centerline Holding Company, et al., No.
-- "Quill v. Centerline Holding Co., Inc, et al., No.
08 CV 01902," filed on Feb. 26, 2008.
2007, through Dec. 28, 2007.
Litigation, Case No. 1:08-cv-00505-SAS," filed in the U.S.
Jan. 25, 2007, the defendants filed a petition asking the U.S.
to appeal on an interlocutory basis.
subsequent U.S. Supreme Court decision in "Tellabs, Inc. v.
approval and certain other conditions.
defendants do not admit to any liability.
Protection Act and names ChoicePoint, Inc., as a defendant.
The class-action lawsuit was filed on Aug. 11, 2003, in the U.S.
Vehicles in violation of DPPA.
written consent of the individual.
attorneys' fees and costs, and injunctive and other relief.
judgment on the pleadings as to the plaintiffs' "obtaining"
claim. To date, the court has not ruled on the pending motion.
engaged in court ordered mediation beginning in February 2006.
intervention and the granting of the temporary injunction.
against pursuing related proceedings in other Courts.
not yet issued a ruling.
Judge Jose E. Martinez presiding.
through the date of judgment.
Eastern District of Texas, Judge Judge T. John Ward presiding.
charges on consumers, the report explains.
whose bank debit cards or bank accounts were charged.
if so, in what amount.
Nevada Deceptive Trade Practices statutes, Nev. Rev.
and further relief as the court deems just and proper.
for the District of Nevada.
ruling issued on September 5, 2008.
injury, are in a conflict of interest.
certification is essentially that for summary judgment."
overstating the drug's utility and understating its drawbacks.
York Times reporter Alex Berenson.
congruent with our long tradition of open courts, is desirable."
unnecessary embarrassment" to any party, NYLJ says.
unseal are granted," Judge Weinstein wrote.
than 12 million users and billions of dollars in annual sales.
the past two years (Class Action Reporter, May 2, 2008).
and 40.4% of its revenues for the year ended December 31, 2007.
services under the hanafos and hanafone brands, respectively.
private leased circuit service for enterprises.
the Las Vegas Valley, Brian Eckhouse writes for Las Vegas Sun.
35,000 to 50,000 homes throughout the Las Vegas Valley.
leaks, reduced water flow and breaks.
District Court Judge Timothy Williams.
without admitting liability, the report says.
each sought to collect $10,000 in damages.
Vegas area, the report says.
the other homebuilders and plumbers.
distributed and used in Kansas and elsewhere without incident.
and plumbing companies that installed the product.
County, The Washington Post reports.
Street firms, corrupt local politicians and others.
is located in Jefferson County.
and bond insurers such as XL Capital Assurance.
investment bankers and faces an unprecedented financial crisis."
Chapter 9 municipal bankruptcy filing by Jefferson County.
Such a filing by Jefferson County would be the biggest by a U.S.
protection in December 1994, the report notes.
Langford headed the county council.
2003 and 2004 to Mr. Blount's firm.
fundamentals, financial results and earnings growth potential.
prices of its put options," the plaintiffs said.
substantial losses to LDK's investors."
typical claims of the class and is an "adequate and appropriate"
market price were damaged in the same way.
lied to shareholders, CourtHouse News Service reports.
Leggett & Platt makes mattress components.
The suit is "New England Carpenters Pension Fund, et al. v.
the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri.
alleging it misrepresented its pet food as "premium quality,"
manufactured, marketed, distributed and sold by Natura.
competent and reliable scientific data and research.
intervention by the Therapeutic Goods Administration.
worth around AUD200 million against the authority.
"misfeasance of public office" occurred.
Laboratories resolved that these two companies be wound-up.
license on Nov. 4, 2003.
dividend from the winding up.
Hayman and the Passaic County Board of Chosen Freeholders.
overcrowding and are subjected to beatings when they complain.
existent, leading to oppressive heat and cold, the suit claims.
based law firm Dechert LLP represent the prisoners.
protests charging mistreatment and overcrowding.
Hayden called conditions at the jail "shameful."
heating and air conditioning system and switching food vendors.
action went to trial, the plaintiffs’ memorandum says.
internal tests suggested it remained highly risky.
circumstances, is an outstanding result," the memorandum said.
the company's November 2003 and January 2005 stock offerings.
purchasers in the January 2005 stock offering.
dismissed their complaints without prejudice.
claims (Class Action Reporter, July 4, 2008).
submission of proofs of claim is on Sept. 6, 2008.
Pursuant to an order by an administrative judge, the U.S.
discrimination at the agency, Lawyers and Settlements reports.
required to issue the notice to class members.
agents Emajo Mayberry and Carol Clopton on July 20, 2000.
conditionally certify the class on September 14, 2004.
2007, the report further recalls.
employees who were at least 40 years of age when employed.
policy, The Associated Press reports.
into jail for serious misdemeanors and felonies.
represent EPS growth of 10% at a minimum.
significantly lower 1Q08 EPS of $0.43, down 2% from the 1Q07.
raises credibility concerns for GE."
$900 million that it had been unable to sell.
acquisition of Fidelity Bankshares, Inc., on January 5, 2007.
connection with the Fidelity Acquisition.
(d) the misstatement of the Company's financial results.
of a special committee to conduct an internal investigation.
or about November 7, 2007.
in connection with Quest Energy's IPO.
Energy and is liable under Section 15 of the Securities Act.
price of Quest Energy shares dropped damaging investors.
completed on or about February 20, 2008.
to decline, wiping out almost $300 million in their value.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.