Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/061023.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 18:51:08+00:00

Document:
NORTHFIELD LABORATORIES: Response to Amended Complaint Due Oct.
UNITED STATES: Court Says CAFA Includes a "Typographical Error"
YUM BRANDS: Discovery Continues in Taco Bell ADA Suit in Calif.
U.S. states, The Associated Press reports.
seized no more than two years before the filing of this lawsuit.
thousands who reside in the United States.
Commerce Clause of the Constitution.
-- class certification pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
review the lawsuit and couldn't immediately comment.
The recent suit is "Torres et al v. Goddard, et al., Case No.
District of Arizona under Judge Mark E Aspey.
2069, E-mail: jcabou@omlaw.com or teckstein@omlaw.com.
would get water this summer.
of the water authority, according to Mr. Cahill.
many homes also relied on the water for toilets and washing.
up the last remnants in his dam.
giant, according to Business Insurance reports.
hormone, and that studies revealing otherwise were false.
available, according to Mr. Martin.
damages, legal costs and interest.
used in the manufacture of polyurethanes.
Corp., formerly known as Crompton Corp.
of urethane and urethane chemicals.
comprising the Materials segment and the Systems segment.
funeral homes, James A. Kimble of The Eagle-Tribune reports.
Burial and Cremation Services Incorporated of Massachusetts.
New Hampshire and Maine courts.
Phone: 954- 921-2131, Fax: 954-921-2191.
Parties in a securities fraud suit filed against Bio-One Corp.
DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo.
misleading statements to the public.
stock between Feb. 4, 2004 and May 9, 2005, inclusive.
Commission during the class period.
that Mr. Dauplaise's son was acting as its de facto treasurer.
cash and half through a promissory note.
A week later, the company announced it had fired Mr. Dauplaise.
the symbol BICO, has since been delisted.
adopted Magistrate Judge Baker's Report & Recommendation.
The suit is "Molema v. Bio-One Corporation, et al., Case No.
referral to Judge David A. Baker.
overcharging, the La Prensa reports.
alleges it was charging per minute.
the national public services authority (ASEP).
the 40-second billing method was valid.
Uncurepa lawyer Giovani Fletcher represents the plaintiffs.
and providers of content, applications and Internet services.
Europe, Asia, the Caribbean, Panama and the Middle East.
No. CV 05-2017 ABC (JWJx)."
Any objections must be made on or before Nov. 3, 2006.
defendant the County of Los Angeles itself.
incarceration or interrogation while in LASD's custody.
tissue samples, according to CBC News.
2005. Some of the samples date as far back as 1997.
department (Class Action Reporter, Aug. 15, 2006).
since 1997 were not responding as expected to treatment.
testing for estrogen and progesterone receptors.
error rate, adding "if you want to call it that."
the rate of error was in the tissue sampling.
but is not yet part of the request to certify the class action.
women and others that have yet to join could be covered.
treated with the hormone therapy tamoxifen.
Forces Base Gagetown, The Canadian Press reports.
the 1950s to the 1980s.
illnesses linked to exposure to toxins in the chemical sprays.
cancer, diabetes and spina bifida in the children of veterans.
will have to fall, on that body of medicine."
1,500 people who say the Gagetown spraying programs harmed them.
issue. "It's hush money," according to him.
Merchant Law Group filed the suit in July 2005. Previously, Mr.
Action Reporter, Sept. 6, 2006).
Merchant Law Group on the Net: http://www.merchantlaw.com/.
certain executive officers of Clorox Co.
stock option grants (a.k.a. back-dated stock options).
DRAM prices, the Department of Justice announced.
on or about April 1, 2001, until on or about June 15, 2002.
must comply with the antitrust laws."
conspired to fix the price of computer memory.
-- NEC Electronics America, Inc.
February 2002 reached as high as $4.50, the complaint states.
agreed to reduce production to boost prices.
Sherman Act. The cases were consolidated and moved to U.S.
from the defendants between April 1, 1999 and June 22, 2002.
and to each pay a $250,000 fine.
eight months in prison and to pay a criminal fine of $250,000.
five to eight months and to each pay a $250,000 fine.
Florian -- pleaded guilty to the DRAM price-fixing conspiracy.
six months and each paid a $250,000 fine.
criminal fine in November 2005.
was sentenced to pay an $84 million fine in March 2006.
pay a $160 million criminal fine in October 2004.
in DRAM sales in the United States alone in 2004.
Wolf, Haldenstein, Adler, Freeman & Herze are class counsel.
under Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton with referral to Judge Joseph C.
over alleged negligence, according to The Business Gazette.
could affect more than 500 homeowners throughout Maryland.
with the state as a builder.
slated for trial next June.
court. "When there is a strong wind, I can feel it," he said.
filed against Google, Inc., according to Dow Jones Newswires.
be used in both cases.
cases, with publishers and authors teaming up.
same kind of evidence, according to the report.
2008, perhaps even as late as May 2008.
McGraw-Hill Companies filed their suit against Google.
contents of copyrighted books, music or movies.
the electronic rights of the copyright holders of the Works.
its own commercial use and for the use of others.
commercial use of the works.
generate advertising revenue, according to the complaint.
N.V. in the U.S. District Court for District of Massachusetts.
continuing with the discovery phase of the litigation.
through and including Aug. 7, 2000.
securities fraud at the company.
L&H put options from April 28, 1998 through and including Nov.
complaint due to its November 2000 bankruptcy filing.
proceeded into the discovery phase of the litigation.
from accounting firms in a securities class action.
between April 28, 1999 and Nov. 9, 2000, inclusive."
set March 31, 2005. A.B. Data, Ltd. processed the claim forms.
agreed to settle the claims against the Director Defendants.
was set for July 22, 2005.
who are subject to a criminal investigation, as well.
booking that transfer as revenue.
discovery phase of the litigation.
numerous fraudulent analyst reports touting L&H stock.
The suit is "In re Lernout & Hauspie Products, N.V., Sec.
et al., Case No. 8:04-cv-00919-SDM-EAJ."
$475,000 for the two derivative actions.
$15.00 per share (Class Action Reporter, Oct. 9, 2006).
Court for the Middle District of Florida under Judge Steven D.
Merryday with referral to Judge Elizabeth A. Jenkins.
(5) Brian M. Felgoise of th Law Offices of Brian M.
Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins LLP, 655 W.
Baltimore, MD 21202, Phone: 410/332-0030.
michael.chapman@hklaw.com; and Tiffani G. Lee and Tracy A.
international markets worth more than $127 billion.
The judge ruled that Ms. Conlin's actions were not unethical.
Earlier, Microsoft Corp. lawyers sought for the removal of Ms.
case (Class Action Reporter, Oct. 13, 2006).
Microsoft has accused her of unethical conduct.
from May 18, 1994, through June 30, 2006.
purchase high quality software products.
consumers than the products offered by its competitors.
products (Class Action Reporter, Sept. 18, 2006).
could be eligible for multiples of those amounts.
property that belonged to Microsoft."
accused Microsoft of engaging in an "ethical witch hunt."
A trial is scheduled to begin on or after Nov. 13, 2006.
from Dec. 7, 1993 through April 30, 2003, for use in the state.
-- "Spence v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 00-CV-003042,"
-- "Bettendorf v. Microsoft Corp., Case No. 05-CV-010927.
Wisconsin and who did not purchase it for resale.
The court also appointed those lawyers together with John L.
(3) Jack Evans of Microsoft Corp., Phone: +1-425-706-1863.
proposed settlement in the matter: "Joseph Dugan, et al. v.
Office, et al., Docket No. BUR-L-002906-03."
persons and entities that obtained copies on the "self service"
the case (Class Action Reporter, March 10, 2006).
additional pages (Class Action Reporter, Oct. 20, 2006).
Court award more than 40% of the value of the relief obtained.
excess of "actual cost" to the Clerk's Office.
For more details, contact Sander D. Friedman and Donald M.
Fax: 856-988-7744, Web site: http://www.friedmandoherty.com/.
response to a consolidated amended class action complaint.
17 of the Code of Federal Regulations, promulgated there under.
regarding the safety profile and history of PolyHeme.
Northfield's common stock fell with the belated disclosures.
appointment of lead plaintiff be filed by Aug. 16, 2006.
Motions for the appointment of lead plaintiff were filed on Aug.
Pharmaceutical, Inc., a division of Johnson and Johnson Inc.
control patch for six months.
Division, Middlesex County (midl-8005-06), earlier this month.
Heparin and Coumadin anticoagulant therapy.
increased risks of blood clots associated with Ortho Evra.
additional cases against Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc.
throughout the remainder of 2006.
Representing the plaintiffs are Jason Mark, Esq. and Melanie H.
attorney Richard Scruggs in May 2004.
court's decision ends the legal fight.
in reserves filed the lawsuits.
filed, "so I feel some satisfaction."
Inc. and certain of its directors and officers.
Litigation, Case No. C 05 00295 PJH (N.D. Cal.)."
* the Louisiana District Attorneys' Retirement System.
-- Berman DeValerio Pease Tabacco Burt & Pucillo.
the period from April 21, 2004 to Dec. 20, 2004.
The company moved to dismiss the complaint on Sept. 16, 2005.
Plaintiff served an opposition to the motion to dismiss on Nov.
to dismiss was filed on Dec. 19, 2005.
company responded with a motion to dismiss on June 19, 2006.
Litigation, Case No. 3:05-cv-00295-PJH," filed in the U.S.
Representing the company are Jonathan B. Gaskin and Robert P.
company's stock price to be artificially inflated.
on the motions and took the matter under advisement.
granting in part and denying in part defendants' motions.
answers to the 1st amended complaint.
pursuant to the Prospectus Supplement dated Sept. 23, 2003.
Massachusetts under Judge Douglas P. Woodlock.
with another company and inflated revenues.
violations must be brought within one year of alleged fraud.
not relate back to save the claim.
the original claims were insufficient.
class certification was set for October 24, 2006.
The suit is "In Re: Stone & Webster, Inc v. et al., Case No.
District of Massachusetts under Judge Rya W. Zobel.
Patricia Jarrell of Madison and others.
coupons that 4,503 customers will receive.
the fees. Judge King heard arguments on Oct. 10, but as of Oct.
18 he had not reached a decision.
that Thornhill Superstores carried an alarming load of debt.
turn, zero recovery for the class."
of insurance coverage or personal assets to collect from."
its work on the case.
retirement benefits, The Columbia Daily Herald reports.
entitled to three additional years of service to the county.
those three years of service.
employees who lost credited years of service.
appeal of the class certification ruling in the case by U.S.
permits Americans who currently smoke, or ever did smoke "light"
(Class Action Reporter, Sept. 26, 2006).
smokers into the health effects of their product.
not as harmful to health as 'regular' cigarettes.
The judge set a trial date of Jan. 22, 2007.
referral to Judge Steven M. Gold.
Avenue, New York, NY 10017, Phone: 212-450-4000.
Milstein, Hausfeld & Toll, P.L.L.C, 1100 New York Avenue N.W.
West Tower, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005; and William P.
more, Shannon P. Duffy of The Legal Intelligencer reports..
than seven days after entry of the order."
opposite of what it said.
mean 'not more than seven days."
circuits have all reached the same conclusion.
"the crowd speaks with one voice."
reflects the uncontested intent of Congress."
the ruling and will issue a second decision on the merits.
Bell Corp., Case No. 3:02-cv-05849-MJJ," filed in the U.S.
-- monetary relief under the Unruh Act or CDPA.
100,000 individuals in the class.
23(b)(2) class claims for monetary damages.
denied that motion as well.
begun to take certain steps to make those restaurants compliant.
class wide basis to Taco Bell.
Northern District of California under Judge Martin J. Jenkins.
saying, "It has nothing to do with that."
sensible time to make her exit.
citing investigations into large companies such as Boeing Co.
and for five years as a state court judge.
prosecutor's post, a fact that Ms. Yang recently confirmed.
the other side of it," the prosecutor observed.
conservative legal group, the Federalist Society.
Milberg Weiss Bershad & Schulman LLP and partners Messrs.
than 150 class actions and shareholder derivative lawsuits.
the indictment is at: http://researcharchives.com/t/s?dfc.
alleged to have served as a paid plaintiff and attorney Paul T.
paid plaintiff Steven G. Cooperman of Connecticut, and Howard J.
guilty to the charges filed against them. Mr. Lazar and Paul T.
Selzer also pleaded not guilty.
participation in an alleged kickback scheme.
computer systems and services to customers worldwide.
accrual and reserves on the company's balance sheet.
targets, causing significant declines in its stock price.
over 4 million laptop batteries citing a high combustion risk.
Dell's profits fell 51% from the same quarter one year earlier.
financial reporting between 2002 and 2006.
appointment as lead plaintiff in the case.
Ltd. between Feb. 24, 2005 and Oct. 2, 2006.
Group Ltd. and one or more of its officers and/or directors.
statements regarding Presstek's expected revenue growth in 2006.
reach its 10% annual revenue growth target for 2006.
revenue growth target for 2006.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.