Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/070709.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 20:48:35+00:00

Document:
ALLOT COMMUNICATIONS: Faces Securities Fraud Lawsuits in N.Y.
DOLLAR TREE: Seeks to Dismiss Store Mangers’ Lawsuit in Calif.
FOREIGN TIRE: Recalls China-Made Tires Distributed in U.S.
HOST AMERICA: Settles Securities, Derivative Lawsuits in Conn.
were named as defendants in a number of purported securities class actions.
complaints assert violations of U.S. federal securities laws.
network traffic, and enable them to manage and optimize their networks.
purchasers of the company's stock between Mar. 12, 2004 and Sept. 14, 2004.
On Oct. 12, 2004, a complaint captioned, "Sekuk Global Enterprises et al. v.
U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona.
plaintiff filed a consolidated complaint on May 16, 2005.
monetary damages in unspecified amounts.
The suit alleges violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the U.S.
A motion to dismiss the consolidated class action complaint was filed on Jun.
Commission for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2007.
Court for the District of Arizona under Judge James A. Teilborg.
a "deceptive and outrageous" manner, The South Florida Sun-Sentinel reports.
Lock\line LLC of Kansas City, Mo.
insurance actually costs more than the purchase price of a new phone.
the phone in the event of a loss.
protection provides a benefit (Class Action Reporter, June 26, 2006).
interest, costs and attorney fees.
replacement is subject to a non-refundable deductible per loss.
the deductible and proceed with the claim.
refurbished phone between Jan. 20, 2004 and Jan. 26, 2007.
least $1.5 million and potentially as much as $60 million.
required to use this voucher, which is fully transferable.
A. Seitz with referral to Judge Chris M. McAliley.
routine clerical and maintenance work as part of her job.
company who would be affected by this," he said.
lawsuit if class-action status is achieved make as much as $70,000 a year.
"These are people who are working hard out there in the field," he said.
two years, the report said.
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut, under Judge Janet C.
current and former officers and directors violated Section 10(b) of the U.S.
compelling as any opposing inference of non-fraudulent intent.
Court for the Eastern District of Virginia under Judge T. S.
Ellis, III with referral to Judge Theresa Carroll Buchanan.
Charles William McIntyre, Jr., Esq.
fiscal year ended April 30, 2007.
marketing of beverage alcohol to underage consumers.
Division, No. 3:04cv141 (January 2004)."
including Brown- Forman, presumably on the same facts and legal theories.
-- Bertovich (West Virginia) in August 2006.
Wilson (North Carolina) is pending decision on defendant's motion to dismiss.
The respective plaintiffs in the involuntarily dismisses case are appealing.
The D.C. Court of Appeals affirmed the Hakki dismissal in June 2007.
vodka; rum; gin, and ready-to-drink products.
Snapple drinks “all natural”, NJ.com’s Greg Saitz reports.
the "all natural" label false and deceptive.
company to change the products’ labeling and refund consumers.
Cadbury Schweppes could lose millions of dollars if the suit succeeds.
because of the several processes it undergoes.
without merit and we plan to defend against them vigorously."
Tortoreti, Tomes & Callahan, P.C.
Georgia Division, continued to contest the issue.
Attorney Howard Rosenthal represents Equity Group.
Herman N. (Rusty) Johnson, Jr., Esq.
and Troy Ratcliff, who claims an $18,334 loss, as lead plaintiffs.
defendants in three purported class action complaints filed in the U.S.
and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
Company’s common stock during a class period defined in each complaint.
complaint is January 21, 2005 through January 19, 2007.
The judge in the case is Richard A. Lazzara.
granted to nearly 500 customers of Construction Compliance Inc. of St.
Petersburg, which is now in bankruptcy proceedings.
accounting of the truckers’ escrow money.
behalf of owner-operators who entered into a lease agreement with C.R.
England from June 1998 to August 2002.
owner-operators to sign a new agreement.
and one former store manager.
California Labor Code and the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Feb. 3, 2007, the company operated 3,219 discount variety retail stores.
a class action regarding its stock option granting practices.
options issued from 2000 to 2003.
process and its accounting for past stock options.
grants made to the named defendants.
and other relief against the named defendants. The plaintiff is Yenna Wu.
April 25, 2007 and May 2, 2007.
network infrastructure that is simple and easy to manage.
compensation, a violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Alabama, under Judge Ira De Ment with referral to Judge Terry F. Moorer.
federal government is recalling about half a million of these tires.
Philadelphia and put a dangerous tire on the road without consequences."
According to the report, the federal government said the tires' U.S.
importer, Foreign Tire Sales, is responsible for the U.S. recall.
Future Industries, of Cliffwood Beach, N.J., in cooperation with the U.S.
Essentials for Kids Jewelry Sets.
The firm said the recalled metal jewelry sets contain high levels of lead.
Future Industries have not received injury or incident reports.
purses or butterflies. “Essentials for kids” is printed on the packaging.
April 2007 for about $1.
Consumers should immediately take the recalled jewelry away from children.
Industries for information on receiving a full refund.
between 9 a.m. and 5 p.m. ET Monday through Friday.
Gate Safe, Inc. is facing a class-action complaint filed June 14 in the U.S.
violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
California under Judge George H. Wu with referral to Judge Ralph Zarefsky.
regarding Host's commercial relationship with Wal-Mart.
during the alleged class period.
including final approval by the Court.
settlement agreements are available to the public at the Clerk’s Office, U.S.
Building, 450 Main Street, Hartford, CT 06103.
The case is “Yorks v. Host America Corp., et al. (In re Host America Corp.
representations of the cards and include hidden charges.
Judge Margaret M. Morrow with referral to Judge Stephen J. Hillman.
the county jail, The Daily Clarion’s Andrea Howe reports.
Court in Evansville nearly four years ago.
settlement rather than complainants seeking a preliminary injunction.
beds and eight detox units.
forbidding unsolicited mass facsimile transmission.
fiscal year ended Dec. 31, 2006.
Jackson Hewitt Tax Service, Inc. faces a purported class action in the U.S.
under Judge Katharine S. Hayden with referral to Judge Patty Shwartz.
Saltz Mongeluzzi Barrett & Bendesky, P.C.
(Santa Barbara, following a transfer from San Francisco).
provision is unlawful or fraudulent.
damages, statutory damages, punitive damages, attorneys' fees, and expenses.
and abetting, in the actions of SBB&T.
decision. The California Supreme Court denied review.
remittitur pending certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court.
class action suit is proceeding in the trial court.
2007, according to the company’s June 29, 2007 Form 10-K filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007.
the Cuyahoga County (O.) Court of Common Pleas.
which the company opposed on Jan. 16, 2007.
decision with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit.
for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2007.
intestinal perforation or blockage, which can be fatal.
magnets and repair intestinal perforations.
40330 1 are printed on the packaging.
through March 2006 for about $3.
sick prisoners beyond July the 15 schedule to close the prison.
Action Reporter, Oct. 18, 2006).
The case is named "USA v. Michigan, State of, et al., Case No.
915 15th St., NW, 7th Fl.
Cor. and certain of its current and former executive officers and directors.
common stock between May 22, 2003 and Feb. 11, 2005.
period, purporting to represent the same class.
artificially inflated the market price of the company's common stock.
Officer Daniel A. Baker, Ph.D.
under Judge Michael J. Davis with referral to Judge Jeanne J. Graham.
NxCare, Inc. is facing a class-action complaint filed June 29 in the U.S.
their “breakthrough formula contains six exclusive complexes” to reduce fat.
practices and other acts described herein.
-- For such other and further relief deemed proper.
class action against Ocwen Loan Servicing, CourtHouse News Service reports.
Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act and the Truth in Lending Act.
determination of pre-emption, according to the report.
Litigation, MDL Docket No. 1604," (MDL Proceeding).
some of which may be transferred to and consolidated in the MDL Proceeding.
The borrowers in many of these lawsuits seek class-action certification.
MDL Proceeding or any related lawsuits.
and other legitimate default or foreclosure related expenses.
motion to take an interlocutory appeal on the federal preemption issue.
company's request to hear its appeal on the federal preemption issue.
the Northern District of Illinois under Judge Charles R. Norgle, Sr.
to file claims is Oct. 9, 2007.
various times from February 2003 to June 9, 2004.
Those actions were consolidated as, "In re OmniVision Technologies, Inc., No.
complaint and discovery commenced thereafter.
Action Reporter, March 26, 2007).
of California under Judge Samuel L. Conti with referral to Judge Joseph C.
first of these actions also named GE and Blackstone.
holding the Company’s Common stock.
duties by failing to maximize stockholder value in approving the transaction.
On April 5, 2007, the defendants moved to dismiss the first filed complaint.
made the first filed complaint the operative one.
according to the PHH Corp.’s June 27, 2007 Form 20-F filing with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.
Production, Mortgage Servicing and Fleet Management Services.
for the District of New Hampshire before Judge Paul Barbadoro.
for final distribution, inclusive of interest.
from an outside auditor in the history of securities class action litigation.
through and including June 7, 2002 are covered by the settlement.
Jay Eisenhofer of Grant & Eisenhofer.
settlement represents by far the largest settlement ever agreed to by PwC.
enormous obstacles to proving loss causation and damages."
representatives certified by the court in this litigation.
named as defendants in over 40 securities class actions.
The Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation transferred to the U.S.
actions for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings.
12(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
Section 15 of the Securities Act of 1933.
Action Reporter, May 16, 2007).
Litigation, MDL-1335, Master Docket No. 1:02-md-01335-PB," filed in the U.S.
District Court for the District of New Hampshire under Judge Paul Barbadoro.
to file claims is Oct. 27, 2007.
officer (Class Action Reporter, June 27, 2007).
period of Nov. 8, 2004 through Aug. 11, 2005.
stockholders as defined in the Andropolis Complaint.
who caused the company to engage in such acts for their own benefit.
departures from their positions with the company.
2006 to file a consolidated complaint.
and alleges violations of Section 14(a) of the U.S.
Aug. 13, 2004 and Jan. 9, 2006, inclusive.
All defendants have filed motions to dismiss the consolidated complaint.
plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal on Feb. 14, 2007.
agreement to settle, subject to approval by the Court.
insurance, to the putative class and its counsel.
The Court preliminarily approved the agreement on May 31, 2007.
The suit is "Andropolis v. Red Robin Gourmet Burgers, Inc., et al., Case No.
Colorado under Judge Edward W. Nottingham with referral to Judge Boyd N.
Gerald L. Bader, Jr., Esq.
The Law Offices of F. James Donnelly, P.C.
Soualian v. International Coffee and Tea LLC (CV 07-502-RGK).
Taken together, along with a May 25 decision on “Spikings v. Cost Plus, Inc.
Pillsbury Winthrop said in a statement.
receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of the sale or transaction.
cost tens of millions or even billions of dollars.
they were made aware of the alleged technical violation.
targeted Avis Rent A Car and clothing retailer Charlotte Russe.
unspecified damages, restitution and equitable relief.
privately owned midsized businesses and mid-cap public companies.
federally awarded 8(a) contracts, federal statutes, and the U.S.
woman owned 8(a) firm under Federal and District of Columbia law.
the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, under Judge Royce C.
of The Seattle Times reports.
faculty members with 2 percent merit raises.
academic year and each subsequent one (Class Action Reporter May 24, 2006).
increase in 2008. The amount could reach up to $290,000.
Nearly $195,000 will go to the attorneys’ fees.
Attorney Rick Gautschi represented the plaintiffs.
California under Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong.
VeriSign, Inc. is facing a class-action complaint filed June 28 in the U.S.
by the existing owner of the telephone number.
equity and justice may require.
under Judge Patricia V. Trumbull.
The court said the plaintiffs' injuries are too "remote."
competition law. It sought relief against unjust enrichment.
the latest development, the state’s Supreme Court agreed with the ruling.
lack antitrust standing," Judge Ternus wrote.
theory of unjust enrichment because their injuries are too remote," she added.
electronic form if the material is offered on paper, The Olympian reports.
records of the information, Amy Rolph of SeattlePI reports.
Act,” Jude Pomeroy said in her oral ruling on June 30.
October 12, 2005 $65 million follow-on offering.
announcement, however, Threshold stock fell to $1.55 per share.
common stock during the Class Period.
reliable, but is not guaranteed.
The CAR subscription rate is $575 for six months delivered via e-mail.
information, contact Christopher Beard at 240/629-3300.

References: v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V.