Source: https://www.hydroreform.org/policy/fpa?page=8
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 04:52:13+00:00

Document:
There are over 2,000 hydropower dams in the United States with licenses issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) under the authority of the Federal Power Act (hereinafter “Act’). Most of the licenses issued by FERC between 30 to 50 years ago were issued with little or no attention given to environmental protection. As a result, many of the dam rental agreements we are living with today were designed solely to benefit power generation, written decades ago when we did not understand the damage that poorly operated dams do to our rivers.
The Federal Power Act, 16 U.S.C. § 791-828(c), passed in 1920 and amended in 1935 and 1986, created the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), an independent regulatory agency that oversees the natural gas, oil, and electricity markets, regulates the transmission and sale of these energy resources (except for oil), provides licenses for non-federal hydroelectric plants, and addresses environmental matters arising in any of the areas above. The agency is governed by a five member commission appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate, 16 U.S.C. § 792.
were constructed after August 26, 1935 and are located on a non-navigable stream that affects the interests of interstate or foreign commerce (including providing power to an interstate power grid).
Navigable waters include parts of stream or other bodies over which Congress has jurisdiction to regulate commerce which, either in their natural or improved condition, are suitable for use to transport persons or property in interstate or foreign commerce. According to the Act, hydropower licenses are not to exceed 50 years in length. 16 U.S.C. §§ 797, 798-802.
Before 1986, dam licenses issued by FERC primarily considered a river’s power generation potential in issuing licenses, often without regard for the project’s environmental impacts. The 1986 amendments to the Federal Power Act required FERC, when deciding whether to issue a license, to consider not only the power generation potential of a river, but also to give equal consideration to other values such as energy conservation, protection of fish and wildlife, recreational opportunities, and preservation of general environmental quality. In addition, more attention has been paid the 1920 Act’s requirements that FERC consult with other agencies and that licenses contain conditions discussed in more detail below.
Under Section 4(e) of the Act, 16 U.S.C § 797(e), FERC must consider environmental requirements for licensing a project within a federal reservation. A federal reservation under the Act is a technical term, defined generally as a national forest, tribal land, military reservations, and other lands and interests in lands reserved for other public purposes. They include any lands and interests in lands acquired and held for any public purposes by the federal government (they do not include national monuments or national parks, where hydropower licensing is prohibited).
FERC must find that the license will not interfere with or be inconsistent with the purposes for which the reservation was created or acquired.
A license must be issued on terms that the federal agency responsible for the reservation finds are necessary for the adequate protection and utilization of that reservation. This is not a veto power, and the land managing agency may not prevent FERC from issuing the license. However, the land managing agency’s conditions must be included within the FERC license or it cannot be issued.
Section 18 of the Federal Power Act states that FERC “shall require the construction, maintenance, and operation by a licensee at its own expenses of such…fishways as may be prescribed by the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Commerce, as appropriate.” 16 U.S.C. § 811. The federal fish agency may prescribe a fishway that, in its judgment, is necessary to maintain all life stages of the fish impacted by the project.
Project operations and measures related to structures, facilities, or devices necessary to ensure effectiveness.
These conditions may be applied in the FERC license or FERC may reserve its authority to include a fishway prescription in the future.
Amendments to the Act in 1986 added an additional requirement that FERC consider both power and non-power resources, and to solicit recommendations on license conditions from the U.S. Department of Commerce’s National Marine Fisheries Service, the U.S. Department of Interior’s U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and state fish and wildlife agencies. 16 U.S.C. § 803(j) (known as 10(j) recommendations).
FERC must give deference to these recommended conditions but can still alter or reject them by following prescribed procedures. A section 10(j) recommendation need not be included in a FERC license as opposed to a Section 4(d) or Section 18 requirement outlined above.
In the 1986 amendments to the Act, Congress also broadened the scope of FERC’s duties, requiring the Commission to “give equal consideration to the purposes of energy conservation, the protection, mitigation of damage to, and enhancement of, fish and wildlife (including related spawning grounds and habitat), the protection of recreational opportunities, and the preservation of other aspects of environmental quality.” 16 U.S.C. § 801(a)(1) (Section 10(a)(1)). Thus, the Act obligates FERC to give equal consideration to non-power values.
Five years before its license expires, a utility notifies FERC that it intends to seek a new license. It then develops an application that provides important data on the environmental and recreational impacts of its dam(s) and identifies areas for further study. Extensive research then begins.
Two years before its license expires, a utility submits a formal application to FERC detailing how the utility proposes to operate its dam(s). Other government agencies and citizens groups can comment on this application and recommend, and in some cases require, conditions for dam operations. The Commission then conducts an environmental impact statement.
FERC approves the license if it is deemed “in the public interest.” The license must protect fish and wildlife, meet water quality standards, provide fish passage if necessary, protect surrounding lands, and improve recreation opportunities. The final license decision can be appealed to FERC, and then beyond to federal courts.
Because FERC licenses are issued for terms between 30-50 years, relicensing is characterized as a “once in a lifetime” opportunity to restore many of the environmental and social values that characterized a river prior to existence of a dam. The Federal Power Act’s requirements to including consideration of public and environmental values in licensing proceedings has provided river advocates with a major tool for conservation and restoration. Since 1993, more than 400 projects have been relicensed.

References: § 791
 § 792
 § 797
 § 811
 § 803
 § 801