Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/321207507/Samuel-Bhimanpalli-v-Eric-Holder-Jr-4th-Cir-2012
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 20:25:28+00:00

Document:
that would excuse the late filings.
Niang v. Gonzales, 492 F.3d 505, 510 n.5 (4th Cir.
extraordinary circumstances to excuse her untimely filing.).
therefore is not affected by 1252(a)(2)(D).
before a hearing taking evidence is without merit.
dismiss in part the petition for review.
Camara v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 361, 370 (4th Cir. 2004).
alien would be subject to persecution.
INS v. Stevic, 467 U.S.
INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 481 (1992).
171, 177 (4th Cir. 2005).
while the latter consists of isolated incidents.
See 8 C.F.R. 208.16(b)(2)(i) (2012).
Yong Hao Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 203 (4th Cir.
official or other person acting in an official capacity.
243, 246 & n.2 (4th Cir. 2008).
(4th Cir. 2011) (quoting 8 C.F.R. 1208.18(a)(7) (2012)).
fear of persecution necessary to show eligibility for asylum.
not have jurisdiction to review the denial of asylum.
of Christians, particularly pastors, ministers and nuns.
intervene to prevent such activity.
Petitioners were not denied due process.
time they needed in order to present their case.
Cellport Systems v. Kyocera et. al.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.