Source: http://digital.ontarioreports.ca/ontarioreports/20190208?pg=100
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 03:10:13+00:00

Document:
— earmark $7.8 million as working capital.
 Regrettably, the repetition of this principle does very little to lead me to a just and proper conclusion.
4 See Terranet Inc. v. Canarab Marketing Corp.,  O.J. No. 4036, 54 B.L.R. (4th) 138 (S.C.J.), at para. 27; Brant Investments Ltd. v. KeepRite Inc. (1987), 60 O.R. (2d) 737,  O.J. No. 574 (H.C.J.), at p. 26; Lydia Diamond Exploration of Canada Ltd. v. von Anhalt,  O.J. No. 21, 2011 ONSC 3862, 78 B.L.R. (4th) 214 (S.C.J.), at para. 54.
5 Smeenk v. Dexleigh Corp. (1990), 74 O.R. (2d) 385,  O.J. No. 1500 (H.C.J.), at para. 51.
6 See Smeenk v. Dexleigh Corp., supra, at para. 50; Lydia Diamond Exploration of Canada Ltd. v. von Anhalt, supra, at para. 60; Terranet v. Canarab Marketing Corp., supra, at para. 92. See, also, Ford Motor Co. of Canada Ltd. v. Ontario Municipal Employees Retirement Board (1997), 36 O.R. (3d) 384,  O.J. No. 4298 (C.A.), at paras. 5-11.
7 I have, for purposes of my analysis, not taken into consideration the recent Alberta trial and appeal decisions in RFG Private Equity Limited Partnership No. 1B v. Value Creation Inc.,  A.J. No. 738, 2016 ABQB 391, 40 Alta. L.R. (6th) 23, affd  A.J. No. 261, 2018 ABCA 85, 69 Alta. L.R.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.