Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/111103.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 20:12:18+00:00

Document:
ELI LILLY: Supreme Ct. Remands Zyprexa Class Suit to District Ct.
IMAX CORPORATION: Still Faces Consolidated Securities Suit in N.Y.
NETLOGIC MICROSYSTEMS: Awaits Ruling on Bid to Dismiss Del. Suit.
similar litigation or have settled similar litigation.
been brought by health plan members and out-of-network providers.
Panel") has consolidated these class action cases in the U.S.
and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011.
conference for December 1, 2011.
Tennessee, Texas, Virginia and West Virginia.
and one-half times his regular rate of pay.
Mr. Urdiales is a resident of Will County, Illinois.
to hire and fire employees.
Exchange Commission on October 27, 2011.
or range of loss that could result from an unfavorable outcome.
the settlement of the AWP MDL.
individually instead of in bundles.
class action masquerading as an antitrust suit."
Rymer, who died on Sept. 21 from cancer.
order also renders any petitions for rehearing moot.
customers seeking recovery for lack of Fox programming.
quarter ended September 30, 2011.
other defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint.
to the District Court's request in September and October of 2011.
of a $5,000 sale and $250,000 from a $5-million sale.
forward" to making its case in court.
The courts have been down this path once before.
U.S. Supreme Court refused to take up Mr. Morseburg's appeal.
any state" are not valid.
Ms. Vickers wrote that the California law "arguably . . .
royalty law would fail again.
national resale royalty provision for artists, said on Oct. 19.
their bottom lines -- punitive damages.
the European Union extend droit de suite to all its member states.
sellers in the United States to pay royalties.
complicated to enforce, the way it is in California now,"
make sure a 5% royalty was paid.
Products purchased indirectly from the Defendant companies.
the lawsuit and (b) money for indirect purchasers in 24 states.
A Settlement has been reached with Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd.
through November 25, 2007, any CRT Product made by the Defendants.
Both consumers and resellers are included in the Settlement.
case and then distribute the funds together to reduce expenses.
Notice describes how to exclude yourself or to object. The U.S.
Settlement. We do not know how long these decisions will take.
c/o The Notice Company, P.O. Box 778, Hingham, MA 02043.
and claims under the RICO statute.
their RICO and antitrust claims from the Ingenix litigation.
have now been dismissed by the Franco court for lack of standing.
and global health care and related financial protection programs.
quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011.
for a writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court.
plaintiffs may pursue as an alternative remedy.
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011.
relief, backpay, lost benefits, and preferential rights to jobs.
which is fully briefed and pending.
possible to estimate a range of loss (if any) at this time.
"I think the hammer's about to fall -- that's my opinion,"
been installed in Daytona Beach, Holly Hill and DeLand.
requested that the case be moved to federal court in Orlando.
matter is federalized, the outcome would apply to Palm Coast.
and may have to lead to the reimbursement of every ticket paid.
fines did so voluntarily, and therefore should not be reimbursed.
signs of flaring again in 2012.
private vendors that install and operate cameras.
officers, are the sources of the citations.
to increase law enforcement in more locations.
because of the Cocoa Beach traffic cameras.
lost a single one, he says.
may not close by such time.
approval of the proposed settlement by the court.
bipolar I disorder, and bipolar maintenance.
for their members or insured patients being prescribed Zyprexa.
consumers, and denied the Company's motion for summary judgment.
proceedings on potential individual third-party payor claims.
collaborations with eminent scientific organizations.
Title Insurance Company and Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation.
collapse of the auction rate security market in early 2008.
South Carolina and a status conference was held on April 22, 2011.
motion to dismiss the action on September 30, 2011.
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended September 30, 2011.
The appeal is a public hearing. Anyone can attend.
human right to one's cultural identity.
their birth names, their customs, their family, their genealogy.
"negligence" on the part of the federal government.
individuals made a deal in that case.
action where they are suing Canada.
caused them much pain and suffering.
deal that will primarily benefit insiders, shareholders say.
Company's October 27, 2011, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
Abrams, LLP as lead plaintiff's counsel.
to certain policy limits and deductibles.
period ended September 30, 2011.
to certain policy limits, exclusions and deductibles.
Stephen Anastasio v. Internap Network Services Corp. and James P.
between March 28, 2007, and March 18, 2008.
misstatements and omissions to maintain the Company's share price.
Plaintiffs seek unspecified damages and other relief.
dismiss and denied the individual defendants' motion to dismiss.
2010, plaintiffs filed their Third Amended Class Action Complaint.
proposed class action settlement between Kinder Morgan G.P. Inc.
the first quarter of 2012.
various other disputes arising in the ordinary course of business.
the reporting periods in which such matters are resolved.
undermined compliance with the warnings on cigarette packages.
approximately $262 million and then to approximately $242 million.
obligations. Both the Louisiana Supreme Court and the U.S.
not petitioned the court for costs or attorneys' fees.
loss or range of loss, if any, to the Company at this time.
class action lawsuit filed by insulation installation companies.
the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011.
The Company is vigorously defending the Columbus Drywall case.
the installation of insulation and other building products.
the remaining cities and towns in the class.
fees and other equitable relief.
the Company's October 27, 2011, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
Merger, the Company will become a subsidiary of Broadcom.
defendants filed a motion to dismiss the Delaware Action.
the quarter ended September 30, 2011.
plaintiffs' appeal were conducted on September 15, 2010.
affirmed the District Court's dismissal of the amended complaint.
2011, the Court denied the plaintiffs' request for a rehearing.
result, all legal action related to this lawsuit has concluded.
major railroads that was filed on March 25, 2008, in the U.S.
the Company's October 28, 2011, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
without requirement of financial contribution from the Company.
to the settlement have appealed and their appeal is now pending.
claims that have been asserted against it has been described.
However, no estimate of the loss or range of loss can be made.
a Notice of Appeal of the court's ruling. The appeal was denied.
for the quarter ended Sept. 24, 2011.
during the period between November 6, 2008 and February 2, 2009.
(the ARS), had been purchased from Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.
Excellence Nessuah Gemel & Pension, Ltd., as Co-Lead Plaintiffs.
additional named plaintiff. Although Harel is a non-U.S.
be appointed as Lead Plaintiff to replace the Co-Lead Plaintiffs.
left for later the selection of Lead Plaintiffs.
Brunel Pharma Limited and Galpharm Healthcare Ltd.
contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable.
including violations of California wage and hour laws.
Company's October 28, 2011, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
September 2009, the "Settlement Agreement").
plaintiffs in the Consolidated Action.
financial results for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2009.
Sullivan action to stay that action until January 31, 2012.
expenses of each such plaintiff's attorneys and experts.
relief sought includes compensatory damages and treble damages.
merit and will continue to vigorously defend the action.
be entered in the coming weeks.
the Southern District of New York (the "Court") as: Felzen, et al.
3983; Pelissier, et al. v. Avici Systems, Inc., et al., C.A. No.
01-CV-4204; Esther, et al. v. Avici Systems, Inc., et al., C.A.
No. 01-CV-4352; Zhous, et al. v. Avici Systems, Inc. et al., C.A.
Appeals articulated in its December 5, 2006 decision.
dismiss the amended complaints in the six focus cases.
judge for purposes of coordinated case management.
Court approved the terms of the proposed settlement.
Judgment was entered on January 14, 2010.
with this litigation, and this litigation would be resolved.
filed in federal district courts throughout the United States.
Order transferring the cases for pre-trial purposes to the U.S.
decision to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss.
On April 19, 2010, plaintiffs appealed this decision to the U.S.
estimate a range of possible loss.
two of the three named plaintiffs.
On November 14, 2008, the plaintiffs in Mark Swinegar, et al. v.
2011, the court granted the Company's motion for summary judgment.
California Court of Appeal for the Second District.
manipulating the milk supply through "herd retirements."
in unfair and illegal profits.
marketing order regulations, increasing farm prices of milk."
trade group, to manipulate milk prices for its members' benefit.
dairy cows, with CWT paying the difference.
spent $217 million on herd reductions.
nation's milk supply by approximately 10 billion pounds.
milk price increase of $0.85/cwt by 2007 and $1.75/cwt by 2010.
cumulative increase in milk price revenue of $9.55 billion.
milk products have paid supracompetitive prices."
program planned on engaging in dairy farming again."
dairy production for one year.
billion pounds of farm milk . . ."
fresh milk products and harmed consumers of those products.
damages for antitrust violations and unjust enrichment.
A copy of the Complaint in Odle v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., Case No.
Waste Management Holdings, Inc., filed a lawsuit in the U.S.
financial misstatement by WM during the relevant time period.
each of the current members of the Company's Board of Directors.
resolve the few remaining claims against WM and its Committees.
The outcome of the lawsuit cannot be predicted with certainty.
periods and failing to properly pay hourly and overtime wages.
Commission for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2011.
granted a motion to dismiss the litigation without prejudice.
disclosed, were unfair and were contrary to the contracts.
The Company asserts that it will vigorously defend the matter.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.