Source: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/239/426/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 00:29:26+00:00

Document:
Rules of conduct must necessarily be expressed in general terms and depend upon varying circumstances, and a police statute requiring keepers of hotels to give notice to guests in case of fire is not lacking in due process of law because it does not prescribe fixed rules of conduct. Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373, followed, and International Harvester Co. v. Missouri, 234 U. S. 199, distinguished.
The case falls therefore under the rule of Nash v. United States, 229 U. S. 373, and not under the rule of International Harvester Co. v. Missouri, 234 U. S. 199.
217 U. S. 79; Chicago, Burlington & Quincy R. Co. v. McGuire, 219 U. S. 549; Quong Wing v. Kirkendall, 223 U. S. 59; Schmidinger v. Chicago, 226 U. S. 578; Booth v. Indiana, 237 U. S. 391.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.