Source: https://www.criminallegalnews.org/cln-litigation/2016/matikin-v-barrett-ga-jail-strip-search-suit-petition-for-cert-hrdc-amicus-brief-2013/
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 22:16:12+00:00

Document:
621 F.3d 296 (3d Cir. 2010), aff’d, 132 S. Ct.
ACA, Core Jail Standards § 1-CORE-2C-02 (1st ed.
U.S. Dep’t of Justice, BOP, Program Statement No.
improve conditions of confinement in jails and prisons.
It is primarily funded by The Florida Bar Foundation.
bar. See Parilla v. Eslinger, 2005 WL 3288760 (M.D.
WL 2203481 (S.D. Fla. Aug. 24, 2004) (same).
the preparation or submission of the brief.
members throughout the United States.
facility at issue in this case.
general population may be subjected to a strip search.
spread his or her buttocks for jail staff. Pet. at 4-6.
Circuit’s rule demand this Court’s prompt intervention.
degrading examinations of their naked bodies.
been ordered released by a court are all irrelevant. Pet.
to justify the search or the placement decision.
Police and the Public, 2008 (Oct. 2011), at 9 (Table 12).
Circuit (Alabama, Florida, and Georgia) was 33.3 million. U. S.
offenses within the Eleventh Circuit.
Pub. Policy 95, 116-18 (2008).
these standards in order to be accredited by the ACA.
a minor offense may be strip searched); Conn. Gen.
cause for anything less than a felony); Iowa Code Ann.
detention pursuant to court order); Colo. Rev. Stat.
arrests); Jones v. Edwards, 770 F.2d 739, 742 (8th Cir.
justification for strip searching them.
the law.” Barnes v. District of Columbia, 793 F. Supp.
2d 260, 289-90 (D.D.C. 2011).
bell. Pet at 32-33 n.6.
the Eighth Amendment.” Id. at 741-42.
search may depend on the existence of alternatives.
alternatives or develop additional ones.
the general population solely in order to process them.
District of Columbia, 384 F. Supp. 2d 342, 344 (D.D.C.
has sometimes done just that. Pet. at 7.
hidden under the clothing, but not in a body cavity.
between institutional security and individual privacy.
F.2d 1270, 1277 (5th Cir. 1985).
Blackburn v. Snow, 771 F.2d 556, 563 (1st Cir.
submit their evidence to a magistrate.” Gerstein v.
328 F.3d 1192, 1199-1200 (9th Cir. 2003); Lewis v.
interests of detainees, during these periods.

References: § 1
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.