Source: http://scinn.nas.gov.ua/ru/archive/7%281%29/7%281%2902
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 04:18:20+00:00

Document:
Рассмотрена история возникновения, современное состояние и будущее метода абдукционного компьютерного агентного симуляционного моделирования. Данный метод используют для объяснения эволюционных процессов, происходящих в экономике, а также для прогнозирования развития экономических структур. Несмотря на ряд недостатков (в частности, недостаточно реалистичное поведение агентов), которые можно преодолеть путем усовершенствования как содержательной части модели, так и компьютерных программ, метод уже используется в коммерческих и экспертных целях по заказу отдельных фирм, отдельных отраслей промышленности и правительств различных стран.
1. Кюнтцель C. Эволюционное моделирование и критический реализм // Вопросы экономики. — 2009. — № 1. — С. 101-118.
3. Richard R. Nelson and Sidney G. Winter. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. — London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1982; Нельсон Р., Уинтер С. Эволюционная теория экономических изменений: Пер. с англ. — М.: Дело, 2002. — 487 с.
5. Silverberg G. Technical Progress, Capital Accumulation and Effective Demand: A Selforganisation Model, Universitat Stuttgard // Published in D. Batten (ed. (1987) Economic Evolution and Structural Change. — BerlinHeidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag, 1985.
6. Silverberg G., Dosi G., Orsenigo L. Innovation, Diversity and Diffusion: A Self-Organisation Model // Economic Journal. — 1988. — V. 98. — P. 1032-1054.
7. Kwasnicka H., Kwasnicki W. Market, Innovation, Competition. An evolutionary model of industrial dynamics // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. — 1992. — V. 19. — P. 343-368.
8. Silverberg G., Lehnert D. Long Waves and ‘Evolutionary Chaos’ in a Simple Schumpeterian Model of Embodied Technical Change // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 1993. — V. 4. P. 9-37.
9. Silverberg G., Lehnert D. Evolutionary Chaos: Growth Fluctuations in a Schumpeterian Model of Creative Destruction // MERIT Report 93-003, 1993.
10. Silverberg G., Verspagen B. Learning. Innovation and Economic Growth: A Long-run Model of Industrial Dynamics // Industrial and Corporate Change/ — 1994. — V. 3, No 1. — P. 199-223.
11. Silverberg G., Verspagen B. Economic Dynamics and Behavioral Adaptation: An Application to an Evolutionary Endogenous Growth Model // IIASA Working paper WP-94-84, 1994.
12. Silverberg G., Verspagen B. Collective learning, innovation and growth in a boundedly rational, evolutionary world // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. — 1994. — V. 4. — P. 207-226.
13. Silverberg G., Verspagen B. From the Artificial to the Endogenous: Modelling Evolutionary Adaptation and Economic Growth // IIASA Working paper WP-95-08, 1995.
14. Silverberg G., Verspagen B. An Evolutionary Model of Long Term Cyclical variations of Catching Up and Falling Behind // IIASA Working paper WP-95-09, 1995.
15. Dosi G., Fabiani S., Freeman Ch., Aversi R. On the Process of Economic Development // Center for Research in Management, University of California at Berkeley, CCC Working Paper No. 93-2, 1993.
16. Dosi G., Marsili O., Orsenigo L., Salvatore R. Learning, Market Selection and the Evolution of Industrial Structures // Small Business Economics. 1995. — V. 7. — P. 411-436; first published in 1993 as working paper: Center for Research in Management, University of California at Berkeley, CCC Working Paper No. 93-9.
17. Dosi G., Fabiani S., Aversi R., Meacci M. The Dynamics of International Differentiation: A Multi-country Evolutionary Model // Industrial and Corporate Change. 1994. — V. 2, No 3. — P. 225-241.
18. Windrum P., Birchenhall C. Is product life cycle theory a special case? Dominant design and the emergence of market niches through coevolutionary-learning // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. — 1998. — V. 9. — P. 109-134.
19. Yildizoglu M. Modelling Adaptive Learning: R&D Strategies in the Model of Nelson & Winter (1982) // Institut fédéral de recherches sur les dynamques. Université Montesquieu (France, Bordeau). Document de travail № 2001-1 (Juin 2001). — 15 p.
20. Winter S.G. Kaniovski Y. M., Dosi G. A Baseline Model of Industry Evolution // IIASA Working Report IR-97-013, 1997.
21. Winter, S.G. Kaniovski Y. M., Dosi G. Modeling industrial dynamics with innovative Entrants // Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. — 2000. — V. 11. — P. 255-293.
22. Malerba F., Orseniga L. Schumpeterian Patternof Innovation // Cambridge Journal of Economic. — 1995. — V. 19, No 1. — P. 47-65.
23. Breschi S., Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Technological Regimes and Schumpeterian Patterns of Innovation // The Economic Journal. — 2000. — V. 110, No 463. — P. 388-410.
24. Durlauf S.N. Neightborhood Feedback, Endogenous Stratification, and Income Inequality / in Barnett W., Gandolf G., Hillinger C., (eds). Dynamic Disequilibrium Modelling. — Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
25. Weisbuch G., Kirman A.P., Herreiner D. Market Organisation // GREQAM. — Marseille: Working Paper 96A20, 1996.
26. Orlean А. Bayesian Interactions and Collective Dynamics of Opinions: Herd Behavior and Mimetic Contagion // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. — 1995. — V. 28. — P. 257-274.
29. Metcalfe J.S. The Diffusion of Innovation: An Interpretative Survey / in G. Dosi et al. (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theor. — London: Pinter, 1988. — Р. 560-589.
30. Kwasnicki W., Kwasnicka H. Market, innovation, competition: an evolutionary model of industrial dynamics // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. — 1992. — V. 19. — P. 343-368.
31. Kwasnicki W. Knowledge, Innovation and Economy. An Evolutionary Exploration. — Aldsershot: Edward Elgar, 1996.
32. Kwasnicki W. 1996b, Technological Development: An Evolutionary Model and Case Study. // Technological Forecasting and Social Change. — 1996. — V. 52. — P. 31-57.
33. Iwai K. Schumpeterian Dynamics. I: An Evolutionary Model of Innovation and Imitation // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. — 1984. — V. 5 — P. 159-190.
34. Iwai K. Schumpeterian Dynamics. II: Technological Progress, Firm Growth and Economic Selection // Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization. 1984. — V. 5. — P. 321-351.
35. Henkin G.M., Polterovich V.M. 1991, Schumpeterian Dynamics as a Non-linear Wave Theory // Journal of Mathematical Economics — 1991. — V. 20. — P. 551-590.
36. Silverberg G. Embodied Technical Progress in a Dynamic Economic Model: the Self-Organization Paradigm / in Goodwin R., Krüger,M., Vercelli A., (eds) Nonlinear Models of Fluctuating Growth. — 19: 192-208 Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer Verlag, 1984. — P. 192-208.
37. Silverberg G., Lehnert D. Growth Fluctuations in an Evolutionary Model of Creative Destruction / in Silverberg G., Soete, L., (eds). The Economics of Growth and Technical Change: Technologies, Nations, Agents. — Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 1994.
38. Englmann F.C. Innovation, Diffusion, Employment and Wage Policy // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. — 1992. — V. 2. — P. 179-193.
39. Englmann, F.C. A Schumpeterian Model of Endogenous Innovation and Growth // Journal of Evolutionary Economics. — 1994. — V. 4. — P. 227-242.
40. Foster D., Young P. Stochastic Evolutionary Game Dynamics // Theoretical Population Biology. — 1990. — V. 38. — P. 219-232.
41. Young H.P. The Evolution of Conventions // Econometrica. — 1993. — V. 61, No 1. — P. 57-85.
42. Young H.P. 1996, The Economics of Convention // Journal of Economic Perspectives. — 1996. — V. 10, No 2. — P. 105-122.
43. Kandori M., Mailath G.J., Rob R. Learning, Mutations, and Long Run Equilibrium in Games // Econometrica. — 1993. — V. 61, No 1. — P. 29-56.
49. Elgar Companion to Neo-Schumpeterian Economics / Horst Hanusch, Andreas Pyka (eds). — Cheltenham, Camberley (UK), Northampton (MA, USA): Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007. — 1232 p.
52. Козик В.В., Сидоров Ю.І., Скворцов І.Б., Тарасовська О.Б. Застосування моделі Лоткі—Вольтерра для опису дуопольно-дуопсонієвої конкуренції // Актуальні проблеми економіки. — 2010. — № 2(104). — С. 252-260.
57. Saviotti P. P. Applied Evolutionary Economics: New Empirical Methods and Simulation Techniques. — Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2003.
58. Malerba F., Orsenigo L. Towards a History Friendly Model of Innovation, Market Structure and Regulation in the Dynamics of the Pharmaceutical Industry: the Age of Random Screening // KITeS Working Papers 124, KITeS, Centre for Knowledge, Internationalization and Technology Studies, Universita Bocconi, Milano, Italy, revised Jan 2001.
59. Bunn D., Oliveira F. S. Agent-Based Analysis of Technological Diversification and Specialisation in Electricity Markets // European Journal of Operations Research. — 2007. — V. 181, No 3. — P. 1265-1278.
61. Faber A., Valente M., Janssen P. Exploring Domestic Micro-cogeneration in the Netherlands: An Agent-based Demand Model for Technological Diffusion // Energy Policy. — 2010. — V. 38(6). — P. 2763-2775.
62. Fagiolo G., Valente M., Vriend N.J. Segregation in network // J. of Ecinomic Behavior & Organization. — 2007. — V. 64. — P. 316-336.
63. Malerba F., Nelson R., Orsenigo L., Winter S. Public policies and changing boundaries of firms in a «historyfriendly» model of the co-evolution of the computer and semiconductor industries // J. of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2008. — V. 67(2). — P. 355-380.
64. Cassi L., Corrocher N., Malerba F., Vonortas N, 2008. Research Networks As Infrastructure For Knowledge Diffusion In European Regions // Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor and Francis Journals. — 2008. — V. 17(7-8). — P. 663-676.
65. Ciarli T., Lorentz A., Savona M., Valente M. The Effect of Consumption and Production Structure on Growth and Distribution. A Micro to Macro Model // Metroeconomica. — 2010. — V. 61, No 1. — P. 180-218.
66. Robinsoт S. http://www.amazon.co.uk/Simulation-Practice-Model-Developmentand-Use/dp/... — # Simulation: The Practice of Model Developmentand Use. — UK, John Wiley & Sons, 2003.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.