Source: https://www2.oge.gov/web/oge.nsf/Legal%20Advisories?OpenView&RestrictToCategory=%3Cbr/%3E%3Cstrong%3E1990%3C/strong%3E%3Cbr/%3E%3Chr/%3E
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 08:59:48+00:00

Document:
The restrictions in Title VI of the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 on outside earning and employment activities apply to an agency board member, despite specific statutory job requirements, because the member is a non-career officer of the government, is compensated at a rate in excess of the GS-16 rate, and is not a special Government employee.
The facts presented to OGE indicate that an agency board member’s participation in the Citizen Ambassador Program is so closely connected with his agency responsibilities that it can be considered official rather than private participation; however, the agency must determine that the board member's participation in an official capacity is appropriate. If participation is official, the agency would be obligated to pay all expenses in connection with such official travel, unless reimbursement were determined to be permissible under relevant gift-acceptance statutes.
The outside earned income limitation does not exempt donations to charity in amounts exceeding the limitation; it cannot be avoided by accepting compensation in a forms other than cash; it includes dividend received from a corporation to operate a business; and it encompasses deferred payments for services that were performed in the calendar year.
18 U.S.C. § 207 does not bar a former government official who was responsible for developing standards for a specific product from appearing in a press release as the official would not be endorsing a particular brand of the specific product, would not be compensated for his appearance, and has no financial interest in the specific products.
In response to 1989 amendments to section 27 of the Office of Federal Procurement Policy Act, OGE prepared this memorandum to assist agencies in obtaining procurement official certifications and to satisfy the minimum requirement of Subsection 27(l) for a procurement ethics program that furnishes a written explanation of pertinent provisions of the law.
The conflict of interest statutes and regulatory standards of conduct do not prohibit a federal employee who filed for a license on her own behalf prior to becoming a Federal employee from appearing before or making personal representations to the licensing commission as long as she adheres to her recusal and does not focus on her Federal position during the license application process.
Not all transactions and occurrences which result in the realization of ordinary or capital gains income by parties effectuating ethics agreements fall within the statutory scheme of section 1043. OGE has a policy against issuing a Certificate of Divestiture in a case where the effect would be to grant an unfair and unintended benefit.
In the absence of a demonstration that the employee’s interest in the corporation shares is not eligible for rollover treatment, a certificate will not be issued with respect to his interest in the plan. The demonstration must satisfy OGE that the plan administrator could not make a qualifying distribution where 402(f) would apply.
OGE analyzes whether a certain project can be viewed as particular matter with specific parties under 18 U.S.C. § 207. OGE found that the numerous specific steps taken in preparation for a solicitation were sufficient to characterize the contract as a particular matter prior to the former employee’s departure.
OGE discusses the applicability of 18 U.S.C. § 207’s post-employment restrictions to a former Senior Executive Service employee. The restrictions of 207(c), when applied to those positions designated as Senior Employee positions, attach to the person actually serving in a designated position.
OGE responds to concerns regarding the legality of an individual retired from the armed services serving in various capacities with a corporation. The primary restrictions applicable to former Government employees are found at 18 U.S.C. § 207. Other statutes that may apply include 10 U.S.C. § 2379b, 18 U.S.C. § 281 and 18 U.S.C. § 203.
Current civilian employees of the Federal Government are subject to restrictions relating to their acceptance of gifts and employment from foreign governments. Retired civilian employees, however, are not subject to these restrictions.
OGE responds to concerns that the Ethics Reform Act of 1989 would impede the volunteerism of Federal employees. The conflicts of interest statutes that raise concerns (18 U.S.C. §§ 205 and 208) are not new to the Ethics Reform Act.
Conflicts of interest can arise when a law student is in a criminal justice clinic and employed by the Federal Government. A student’s appointment with the Federal Government (whether they are a special Government employee and how long they have worked for the agency) will determine the application of the criminal conflict of interest statute.
A tax lien is not a mortgage and therefore would not fall under the exception in section 102(a)(4) of the Ethics in Government Act. As a result, a tax liability would need to be reported in a financial disclosure report.
A Federal employee is free to participate in nonprofit organization programs as an uncompensated speaker, instructor or panelist in his personal capacity, whether or not the organization is charging a fee for attendance. Employees may not use or permit the use of their official title, position, or authority to further interests.

References: § 207
 § 207
 § 207
 § 207
 § 2379
 § 281
 § 203