Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/403977504/20190328-Rall-Reply-Pfr
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 10:39:37+00:00

Document:
On March 28, 2019 cartoonist Ted Rall replied to the Los Angeles Times' Answer Brief in the Times' anti-SLAPP motion against Rall. Rall asked the California Supreme Court to hear his case and allow his defamation and wrongful termination lawsuit against the Times to be heard by a jury. In this brief Rall focuses on amicus curiae briefs provided for him against the Los Angeles Times by seven First Amendment organizations.
TRIBUNE 365, LLC, et al.
Lafayette Morehouse, Inc. v. Chronicle Pub. Co.
Wilson v. Cable News Network, Inc.
the opportunity to put his defamation case before the jury.
limited to the context of discrimination.
is without merit. The Times relies on Lafayette Morehouse, Inc. v.
Lafayette did not involve the employment issues presented here.
Proceeding”, 34 Stanford L. Rev. 1041 (1982).
heeded. The petition should be granted.
presumably the forthcoming decision in Wilson) sought to rectify.
Prong of the anti-SLAPP motion does not apply.
Times. (See e.g., AOB, p. 39.) This is not a new argument by Rall.
no convincing distinction of Pierce or Handelsman.
report is a question of fact for the jury (Citations).
(Handelsman v. San Francisco Chronicle, supra, 11 Cal.
court affirming a jury verdict in favor of a newspaper. (Answer, p.
34, fn 9.) That is a distinction without significance.
concluded that it did not matter what the enhanced audio shows.
shouting at the officer. The officer is heard replying to the crowd.
parties join in Rall’s attempt at “censorship”) is not well founded.
reinstated or that the Times be compelled to publish his work.
an attack on the integrity of these organizations.
association dedicated to the promotion and preservation of the political cartoon.
the world’s largest organization of political cartoonists.
evolved and adapted to many changes in the news media.
Mike Thompson, Detroit Free Press consider the downstream effects of a harsh ruling in this case.
Liza Donnelly, The New Yorker comes from the targets of the cartoon commentary, and takes a variety of forms.
New York Times International largest newspaper in the state.
Second Floor — North Tower Nikki D. Moore, Esq.
Los Angeles, CA 90017-2566 David E. Snyder, Esq.
the year they are given. Please consult with your tax advisor to determine the full extent to which your donation is deductible.
Marlene Pohle Central & South America.
and harassment from police, generally based on fabricated or exaggerated evidence.
damage has been done to the career of a popular and acclaimed cartoonist.
legal defense of his reputation.
remind the citizenry that the emperor is wearing no clothes.
petition for review before it.
track record in covering censorship issues.
protected from deliberately ruinous lawsuits brought by the wealthy and powerful to silence them.
a political cartoonist seeking to defend himself against charges that he says are defamatory.
associated costs to silence their critics, and is therefore of considerable to concern.
Index on Censorship works to pursue the charitable objectives of its founding charity, the Writers & Scholars Educational Trust.
Re: Frederick Theodore Rall lll v. Tribune 365, LLC, et a!.
newsletter content providers, bloggers, academic writers, editors, poets, playwrights, and other writers.
internationally. Especially in the current climate with the media labeled, "the enemy of the people,"
abuse of the SLAPP law and stands reality on its head.
law in this manner, at this time, could have a chilling effect on the media.
has championed a free press and free speech as fundamental pillars of democracy.
Doug Hecker to a national audience.
Bri Silva anti-trust laws to undermine labor unions and striking workers over a century ago.
and crush an editorial voice that was critical of them—to be backwards and obscene.
government agencies: Do so at your own peril. We hope after careful review of Mr.
Rall’s petition that you will do your part in remedying the injustice being done to Mr.
Rall by granting him his day in court and the right to a jury determination of his case.
Andy Lee Roth, Ph. D.
LA Times' Respondents Brief for anti-SLAPP Motion in Ted Rall v. Ted Rall et al.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.