Source: https://stus.com/Waste-by-Life-Tennant-cartoon-cuu0014
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 18:38:12+00:00

Document:
Woodrick v. Wood; If a life tenant destroys a structure on the property, but such destruction does not decrease the value of the property, the remainder interest is not harmed and no actionable waste occurs; waste.
Eminent domain clause; takings clause, landmark, payment of just compensation.
Party in breach is entitled to restitution of any contractual deposit for benefit conferred by part performance or reliance in excess of loss caused by breach. Forfeiture clause, liquidated damages, penalty clause, restitution, specific performance.
Kremen v. Cohen & Network Solutions, Inc.; a domain name registrar may be liable for conversion of a registered name; bailee; bailment; third-party beneficiary; trespass to chattels.
Popov v. Hayashi; Barry Bonds history-making home run baseball sold to satisfy competing fans' claims; legally cognizable pre-possessory interest in abandoned property constitutes a qualified right to possession; cause of action for conversion.
Marengo Cave Co. v. Ross; subterranean use of property not open and notorious; the statute of limitations; actual, visible, notorious, exclusive, continuous, under a claim of ownership hostile to owner of legal title and world at large; quiet title action.
Broadway National Bank v. Adams; A creditor of a trust beneficiary is not entitled to payment of the trust income by assignment by the beneficiary, or otherwise directly from the trustee, if the terms of the trust prohibit such action; spendthrift trust.
Varnum v. Brien; gay rights; a statute restricting civil marriage to a man and a woman violates the equal protection clause of the Iowa constitution.
Raleigh Avenue Beach Association v. Atlantis Beach Club; public's right to enjoy shore below mean high water mark may require free access to shore across private property and public access to upland dry sand areas of said property.
Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of Sutter; Local land use regulations require individualized assessments of proposed uses of property that impose substantial burdens on religious exercise.
Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Dep't of Environmental Protection; The Takings Clause protects property rights as they are established under state law, which is none here due to doctrine of avulsion. Takings analysis.
Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises; The prepublication use of verbatim excerpts from an as-yet unpublished work does not constitute fair use. Copyright Act. Property Law.
Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District; Fifth Amendment right to just compensation for property the government takes when owners apply for land-use permits; land use permit applicants are especially vulnerable. Property Law.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.