Source: https://antideepstateparty.com/2015/08/06/federal-judge-ordered-us-attorney-to-present-facts-of-criminal-wrongdoing-to-grand-jury-us-marshal/
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 08:42:38+00:00

Document:
( 1 ) U.S. Marshal Paul Safier, is a U.S. Marshal in Trenton, New Jersey. His phone number is 609-989-2069. Call him. Ask him why he sanctions and endorses criminal conduct. He is well aware of the constitutional violations and criminal conduct in my case. His email is psafier@usms.doj.gov. The other email address is my attorney’s, Jerald Di Chiara.
What follows is one of about 12 cases, or more, throughout the country that shows we can go to the Grand Jury. In some states, we can go directly, we do not have to go through the Court [ the supervising judge ] or the prosecutor, as this case indicates, from the Southern district of New York.
US Marshal James Howard, in the Southern district of New York knows that when I go to a Grand Jury, the Grand Jury will indict him. Because US Marshal James Howard conspired in criminal conduct against me, since 2009, I was unlawfully imprisoned in 2010. US Marshal James Howard already admitted that he is on the wrong side of the law, and has been for a long time.
I already went to the U.S. Attorney in New Jersey, Paul Fishman, and caught his office lying to DC, claiming I was never there. I already aired on my TV show the video tape that shows I was at his office.
I already went to the U.S. Attorney in Brooklyn, New York, Loretta Lynch. Loretta Lynch is now the U.S. Attorney General. What is she going to do? Prosecute herself? I already have hard evidence against Loretta Lynch and other US Attorneys.
This case was decided in the Southern district of New York in 1985. For constitutional violations the prosecutor must prosecute. For racketeering the prosecutor must prosecute.
( 2 ) My attorney, Jerald Di Chiara has a responsibilty to bring the constiutional violations and other crimes committed against me to the Grand Jury immediately because as an attorney in New York he will be dis-barred under New York Judicial law section 487 for colluding in any deceit or deception. I already have sworn affidavits that speak to the crimes, deceit and deception committed by Yeshiva University and the Manhattan District Attorney’s office against me.
In the Matter of In re GRAND JURY APPLICATION.
No. 85 Civ. 2235 (VLB).
& Kass, Robert Sylvor and William J. Werner.
Susan Harkins, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, for U.S. Atty.
judicial district [special grand juries impanelled pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
At the outset, I would point out that plaintiffs do not seek to compel the U.S.
court or the United States Attorney present certain information to the grand jury.
initiate proceedings against the other defendants.
D., 410 U.S. 614, 619, 93 S.Ct. 1146, 1149, 35 L.Ed.2d 536 (1973);see Leeke v.
sought to justify allowing them to bring the instant action.
standing, even though no injury would exist without the statute.”Linda R.S. v.
343 (1975); Trafficante v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co., 409 U.S. 205, 212, 93 S.Ct.
see if the plaintiff has alleged that he has suffered a cognizable injury. Nash v.
that duty gives the plaintiffs standing to seek its enforcement.
prerogative of the Executive Branch.” Govt.Memo at 10, citingUnited States v.
737 F.2d 1069 *202 (D.C.Cir.1984); Inmates of Attica Correction Facility v.
no case cited has considered the requirements imposed by 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a).
law other than a violation constituting a petty offense.
has undertaken to control that stage.
independent counsel. There are at least two flaws in that reasoning.
Department of Justice, which the Act requires him to follow. 28 U.S.C.
answers have been offered in this case, however.
737 F.2d at 1079 (emphasis added).
5, 1972 Grand Jury, 370 F.Supp. 1219 (D.D.C.1974).
absolute. In Powell v. Katzenbach, 359 F.2d 234, 235 (D.C.Cir.1965),cert.
enforcement of criminal laws is … subject to constitutional constraints.” ___ U.S.
125, 99 S.Ct. 2198, 2205, 60 L.Ed.2d 755 (1979)).
issues or cases it will pursue.
___ U.S. at ___, 105 S.Ct. at 1657.
U.S. at ___, 105 S.Ct. at 1657; Inmates of Attica Correctional Facility v.
analysis of the legislative history of 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a).
through the foreman, regarding any alleged criminal act.
offense or instance of misconduct.
the prosecutor and court.” House Hearings at 118.
alleged violation of Federal law within its jurisdiction. See Hale v.
Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 [26 S.Ct. 370, 50 L.Ed. 652] (1906); Blair v.
United States alleged to have been committed within the district.
against organized crime and we, therefore, support it.
embodied in the Act in its final form.
his action or recommendation thereon to the special grand jury.
give an accounting of his screening.
House Hearings at 541 (emphasis in original).
ordinary citizens conveyed information about organized crime to the grand jury.
information, and his own action or recommendation.
2 U.S.Code Cong. & Adm.News, House Report No. 91-1549, 91st Cong.2d Sess.
he acts and what he recommends concerning that information.
other form of relief, in the alternative.
U.S. 918, 93 S.Ct. 1555, 36 L.Ed.2d 310 (1973).
channeled through the United States Attorney.
allow plaintiffs’ attorney, Mr. Piccoli, to appear before the grand jury as a witness.
Plaintiffs’ request for a writ of mandamus is granted.
Appointment of Independent Counsel, 596 F.Supp. 1465 (E.D.N.Y.1984). See also Fed.R. Crim.P.
discretion of the government’s attorneys in deciding whether to prosecute.
[*] Editor’s note: citation should be 87 F.Supp. 436 (D.D.C.1949).
PREVIOUS POSTEmergency phone Blitz Tell Hawaii Officials To stop Martial Law and the Rounding Up Homeless.
← Single mom of five seeks help with clothing for her children.

References: v.

 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v.

 § 3332
 v. 
 v.

 § 3332
 v.

 v.