Source: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/print/src_vnaca
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 19:39:52+00:00

Document:
Supreme Court of Justice, Extradition of Gerhard J. B. Bohne, Judgment of 24 August 1966.
Federal Judge, Resolución del juez federal argentino Gabriel Cavallo para resolver la causa No. 8686/2000, Decision of 6 March 2001.
Causa originalmente instruida por el Consejo Supremo de las Fuerzas Armadas en cumplimiento de Decreto 158/83 del Poder Ejecutivo Nacional, Judgment of 9 December 1985, published in Fallos de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, Tomo 309, Vol. II, 1986.
Causa originalmente instruida por el Consejo Supremo de las Fuerzas Armadas en cumplimiento de Decreto 158/83 del Poder Ejecutivo Nacional, Cám. Nac. Apel. Cr. y Correcc., Judgment of 30 December 1986, published in Fallos de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación, Tomo 309, Vol. II, 1986.
Priebke, Erich, s/solicitud de extradición, 1995.
Priebke, Erich s/solicitud de extradición, Judgment of 31 May 1995.
Priebke, Erich s/solicitud de extradición, Judgment of 23 August 1995.
Priebke, Erich s/solicitud de extradición, Judgment of 2 November 1995.
In re Extradition of Josef F. L. Schwammberger, 21 November 1989.
Sala III, In re Extradition of Josef F. L. Schwammberger, Judgment of 30 August 1989.
In re Extradition of Josef F. L. Schwammberger, Judgment of 20 March 1990.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal, AXOIB and Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs , AATA 365, Decision of 17 May 2002.
Military Court at Rabaul, In re Baba Masao, Judgment of 2 June 1947, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 14, 1947, p. 205.
Federal Court, Habib v. Commonwealth (No. 2) , FCA 228, 175 FCR 350, Judgment of 13 March 2009.
Federal Court, Habib v. Commonwealth , FCAFC 12, 183 FCR 62, Judgment of 25 February 2010.
Military Court at Rabaul, In re Ohashi and Others, Judgment of 23 March 1946, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 13, 1946, p. 383.
High Court, Polyukhovich v. The Commonwealth of Australia and Another , 172 CLR 501, Judgment of 14 August 1991.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal, SAH and Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs , AATA 263, Decision of 18 April 2002.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal, SAL and Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs , AATA 1164, Decision of 12 November 2002.
Federal Court, SHCB v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs , FCAFC 308, Judgment of 22 December 2003.
New South Wales Supreme Court, Snedden v. Nationwide News , NSWSC 1446, Judgment of 18 December 2009.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal, SRDDDD and Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs , AATA 150, Decision of 13 February 2004.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal, SRNN and Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Affairs , AATA 983, Decision of 10 November 2000.
Federal Court, SRYYY v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs , FCAFC 42, Judgment of 17 March 2005.
Federal Court, SZAOG v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs , FCAFC 316, Judgment of 17 March 2005.
Federal Court, SZCWP v. Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs , FCAFC 9, Judgment of 20 February 2006.
Military Court at Wewak, Trial of Tazaki Takehiko, Judgment of 30 November 1945, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XIII, 1949, p. 152.
Military Court at Rabaul, Trial of Tanaka Chuichi and Two Others, Judgment of 12 July 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XI, 1949, p. 62.
Military Court at Rabaul, Trial of Tomiyasu Tisato, Judgment of 2 April 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XIII, 1949, p. 152.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal, VAG and Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs , AATA 1332, Decision of 23 December 2002.
Administrative Appeals Tribunal, WBR and Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs , AATA 754, Decision of 5 September 2006.
Federal Court, Zentai v. O’Connor and Others (No. 3) , FCA 691, 187 FCR 495, Judgment of 2 July 2010.
Supreme Court, Cvjetković case, Judgment of 13 July 1994.
Supreme Court, Public Prosecutor v. Leopold L., Judgment of 10 May 1967, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 47, 1974, p. 464.
Military Court, Korad Kalid v. V., J., F. and J., Judgment of 24 May 1995, published in Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 1996, No. 45, p. 45.
Court of Cassation, Second Chamber, In re Köppelmann, Judgment of 27 November 1950, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 17, 1956, p. 397.
Military Court of Brabant, Auditeur Militaire v. Krumkamp, Judgment of 8 February 1950, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 17, 1956, p. 388.
Court-Martial of Liège, 7th Chamber, Ministère Public v. Lieutenant Mo. et consorts, Judgment of 20 November 1972.
Court-Martial of Brussels, Ministère Public v. Sergeant W., Judgment of 18 May 1966, published in Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 1970, p. 806.
Ntezimana, Higarino, Mukangango, Mukabutera case, Judgment of 7–8 June 2001.
Second Chamber, Higaniro, Mukangango, Mukabutera case, Judgment of 9 January 2002.
Court of Cassation, Second Chamber, V. C. et consorts v. S. and R., Judgment of 12 January 1983.
Military Court, Centre pour l’égalité des chances et la lutte contre le racisme v. C. et B., Judgment of 17 December 1997, published in Journal des Tribunaux, 4 April 1998, p. 286.
Cour de Cassation, Deuxième Chambre (Court of Cassation, Second Chamber), H. S. A. et al. v. Ariel Sharon & Amos Yaron, Case No. P.02.1139.F/1, Judgment of 12 February 2003, published in Journal des Tribunaux, 2003, No. 13, p. 243.
Cour de Cassation, Deuxième Chambre (Court of Cassation, Second Chamber), B.P. et al., Case No. P P.03.1517.F, Judgment of 17 December 2003, published in Pasicrisie Belge, 2003, No. 656, p. 2040.
Cour de Cassation, Deuxième Chambre (Court of Cassation, Second Chamber), A.A.Z. et al. v. F.T., M.C.B.P. & X, Case No. P.03.1310.F, Judgment of 14 January 2004, published in Revue de Droit Pénal et de Criminologie, 2004, No. 5, p. 632.
Cour de Cassation, Deuxième Chambre (Court of Cassation, Second Chamber), TotalFinaElf et al., Case No. P.04.0482.F, Judgment of 5 May 2004, published in Pasicrisie Belge, 2004, No. 237, p. 762.
Cour de Cassation, Deuxième Chambre (Court of Cassation, Second Chamber), K.P. et al., Case No. P.04.0352.F, Judgment of 19 May 2004, published in Pasicrisie Belge, 2004, No. 270, p. 865.
Cour d’arbitrage (Court of Arbitration), Law on grave breaches of international humanitarian law, Judgment No.62/2005 of 23 March 2005, available at: http://www.const-court.be/ (last accessed on 31 August 2011).
Supreme Court, Barbie extradition case, Judgment of 11 December 1974, published in Revue Générale de Droit International Public, Vol. 79, 1975, p. 778.
Cantonal Court of Bihać, Bijelić, Judgment of 30 April 1997.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel of the Appellate Division, War Crimes Section, Case No. X-KRŽ 05/51, Judgment of 13 June 2007.
Cantonal Court in Tuzla, Drago, Case No. K. 177/96, Judgment of 13 October 1997.
- Modrica Municipal Court, Ferid Halilović, Decision of 23 October 1997. Decision Number K-43/97, published in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 2, 1999, p. 343.
- Doboj District Court, Ferid Halivović, Decision of 10 August 1998, Decision Number Kz-46/98, published in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 2, 1999, p. 343.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel of the Appellate Division, Section I for War Crimes, Case No. X-KRŽ-05/161, Judgment of 23 October 2007.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel of the Appellate Division, War Crimes Section, Case No. X-KRŽ 05/40, Judgment of 22 June 2007.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel, Case No. X-KR/06/298, Judgment of 19 September 2007.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel of the Appellate Division, War Crimes Section, Case No. KPŽ 32/05, Judgment of 4 April 2006.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel of the Appellate Division, War Crimes Section, Case No. X-KRŽ 05/16, Judgment of 27 October 2006.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel of the Appellate Division, War Crimes Section, Case No. X-KRŽ 06/197, Judgment of 21 November 2007.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel of the Appellate Division, War Crimes Section, Case No. X-KRŽ 05/49, Judgment of 13 December 2006.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel, Section I for War Crimes, Case No. X-KR-05/07, Judgment of 3 November 2006.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel of the Appellate Division, War Crimes Section, Case No. X-KRŽ-05/04, Judgment of 7 August 2007.
Court of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Panel of the Appellate Division, War Crimes Section, Case No. X-KRŽ 05/70, Judgment of 28 March 2007.
Commission on Human Rights, Human Rights Chamber, Turundžić v. Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Applications Nos. CH/00/6143 and CH/00/6150, Decision of 8 February 2001.
Supremo Tribunal Federal, Tribunal Pleno (Supreme Federal Court, Plenary Court), Extradition case No. 1085, request by the Italian Republic for the extradition of Cesare Battisti, Judgment of 16 December 2009, published in Diário da Justiça Eletrônico, No. 67, 16 April 2010.
Cour d’Appel du Centre (Court of Appeals of the Centre Region), Ministère Public contre Théoneste Bagosora (Public Prosecutor’s Office v. Théoneste Bagosora), Case No. 433/COR, Judgment of 15 March 1996.
Cour d’Appel du Centre (Court of Appeals of the Centre Region), Ministère Public contre Augustin Ruzindana, Michel Bakuzakundi, Félicien Muberuka, Pasteur Musabe, Jean Bosco Barayagwiza, Laurent Semanzi, Ferdinand Nahimana, Anatole Nsengiyumva, Télésphore Bizimungu, Jean Baptiste Butera, André Ntagerura et autres (Public Prosecutor’s Office v. Augustin Ruzindana, Michel Bakuzakundi, Félicien Muberuka, Pasteur Musabe, Jean Bosco Barayagwiza, Laurent Semanzi, Ferdinand Nahimana, Anatole Nsengiyumva, Télésphore Bizimungu, Jean Baptiste Butera, André Ntagerura and others), Case No. 615/COR, Judgment of 31 May 1996.
Cour d’Appel du Centre (Court of Appeals of the Centre Region), Ministère Public contre Augustin Ruzindana, Jean Baptiste Butera, Félicien Muberuka, Pasteur Musabe, Jean Bosco Barayagwiza, Michel Bakuzakundi, Télésphore Rimungu, Laurent Semanza (Public Prosecutor’s Office v. Augustin Ruzindana, Jean Baptiste Butera, Félicien Muberuka, Pasteur Musabe, Jean Bosco Barayagwiza, Michel Bakuzakundi, Télésphore Rimungu, Laurent Semanza), Case No. 337/COR, Judgment of 21 February 1997.
Federal Court, Redha Abdul Amir Abbas, Rashid Ridha Abdul Amer and Amer Ridha A Abbas, v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 FC 17, Reasons for Order, 9 January 2004.
Military Court at Aurich, Trial of S.S. Brigadeführer Kurt Meyer, Judgment of 10–28 December 1945, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IV, 1948, p. 97.
Federal Court, Bonefacio Aceve Acevedo v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 480, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 12 April 2006.
Military Police Complaints Commission, MPCC-2007-003 (Attaran), Letter serving as notice of Chairperson’s decision to initiate public interest investigation, 9 February 2007.
Military Police Complaints Commission, MPCC-2007-006 (Amnesty International Canada & BC Civil Liberties Association), Letter serving as notice of Chairperson’s decision to initiate public interest investigation, 26 February 2007.
Federal Court, Nadeem Akhter Ali v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1306, Reasons for Order and Order, 23 September 2005.
Federal Court of Appeal, Hassan Almrei v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2005 FCA 54, Judgment and Reasons for Judgment, 2 August 2005.
Federal Court, Riad Muhsen Abou Alwan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FCT 109, Reasons for Order and Order, 31 January 2003.
Federal Court, Riad Muhsen Abou Alwan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 FC 807, Reasons for Order and Order, 2 June 2004.
- Federal Court of Appeal, Amnesty International Canada and British Columbia Civil Liberties Association v. Canada (Chief of the Defence Staff for the Canadian Forces, Minister of National Defence and Attorney General of Canada), 2008 FCA 401, Docket No. A-149-08, Judgment of 17 December 2008.
Federal Court, Manuel Joao Antonio v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1700, Reasons for Order and Order, 16 December 2005.
Supreme Court, Application under s. 83.28 of the Criminal Code (Re),  2 S.C.R. 248, 2004 SCC 42, Judgment of 23 June 2004.
Federal Court, Ivan Dario Ortiz Ardila v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1518, Reasons for Order and Order, 9 November 2005.
Federal Court, Roozbeh Kianpour Atabaki v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 969, Reasons for Order and Order, 11 July 2005.
Federal Court, Juan Carlos Sanchez Bedoya v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1092, Reasons for Order, 10 August 2005.
Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Immigration Appeal Division, Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Ugo Onyeka Benneth, Case No. TB1-12563, Reasons and Decision of 7 January 2013.
Federal Court, Ruiz Blanco v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 623, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 19 May 2006.
Court Martial Appeal Court of Canada, R. v. Sergeant Mark Adam Boland, Case No. CMAC-374, Judgment of 16 May 1995.
Court of Appeal for Ontario, Bouzari v. Islamic Republic of Iran  OJ No. 2800, Docket No. C38295, Judgment of 30 June 2004.
Court Martial Appeal Court, R. v. David Brocklebank, Judgment of 2 April 1996, published in Canadian Criminal Cases (3d), Vol. 106, p. 234 and in 134 D.L.R. (4th) 377.
Court Martial Appeal Court, R. v. Private Elvin Kyle Brown, Judgment of 6 January 1995, CMAC-372.
Federal Court, Madeleine Mangabu Bukumba and Gracia Mukumba v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 FC 93, Reasons for Order and Order, 22 January 2004.
Federal Court, Canadian Council for Refugees v. The Queen, 2007 FC 1262, Judgment of 29 November 2007.
Federal Court, Jaime Carrasco Varela v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, 2008 FC 436, Docket No. IMM-506-07, Judgment of 8 April 2008.
Federal Court, Ibadullah Catal v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1517, Reasons for Order and Order, 9 November 2005.
Supreme Court, Charkaoui v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration),  1 S.C.R. 350, 2007 SCC 9, Judgment of 23 February 2007.
Federal Court, Ahcene Chougui v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 992, Reasons for Order and Order, 17 August 2006.
Federal Court, Amit Chowdhury v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 139, Reasons for Order and Order, 7 February 2006.
Federal Court, Nelson Pineda Collins, Blanca Isabel Sandoval Gonzalez, Kenya Lizeth Pineda Sandoval v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 732, Reasons for Order, 24 May 2005.
Federal Court, Hernando Corrales Murcia v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 287, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 6 March 2006.
Federal Court, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Neptali Elin Perez de Leon and Marvin Alfredo Perez Perez, 2005 FC 1208, Reasons for Order and Order, 6 September 2005.
Federal Court, Lino Diasonama and Emmanuel Sambi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 888, Reasons for Order and Order, 27 June 2005.
Federal Court, Moses Jerry William Dzimba (A.K.A. Moses Jerry Wil Dzimba) and Sola Dzmiba v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 500, Reasons for Order and Order, 9 May 2007.
Federal Court, Lino Youssef Ayoub El Hayek v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 835, Reasons for Order, 17 June 2005.
Supreme Court, Ell v. Alberta,  1 S.C.R. 857, 2003 SCC 35, Judgment of 26 June 2003.
Supreme Court, Rachidi Ekanza Ezokola v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), Case No. 2013 SCC 40, Judgment and Reasons for Judgment of 19 July 2013.
Federal Court, Veronica Maria Fabela, Juan Manuel Arredondo, Jessica Arredondo, Elvia Rosario Arredondo Lopez, Jose Manuel Arredondo Salgado, Tomas Arredondo Salgado, Veronica Arredondo Fabela, Armando Arredondo Salgado v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1028, Reasons for Order and Order, 25 July 2005.
Federal Court, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Abdulcadir Abdu Farah, 2005 FC 1300, Reasons for Order and Order, 22 September 2005.
Regina v. Imre Finta, Judgment of 10 July 1989, published in 69 Ontario Reports (O.R.) (2nd), 1989, p. 557.
Regina v. Imre Finta, Judgment on Appeal from the Court of Appeal for Ontario, including dissenting opinion, 24 March 1994, published in Supreme Court Reports (S.C.R.), 1994, Vol. 1, p. 701 and in Dominion Law Reports (D.L.R.) (4th), Vol. 112, p. 513.
Federal Court, Abdouraman Fofana v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), Case No. 2013 FC 688, Reasons for Order and Order of 19 June 2013.
Federal Court Trial Division, Rogelio Cuevas Fuentes v. The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, 2003 FCT 379, Judgment of 31 March 2003.
Federal Court, Tewolde Gebremedhin v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), Case No. 2013 FC 380, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment of 16 April 2013.
Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Immigration Appeal Division, Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. Jean Berchmans Habinshuti, Case No. TB2-11256, Reasons and Decision of 9 April 2013.
Federal Court, Saba Asaad Haddad v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 34, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 16 January 2007.
Federal Court, Mahmoud Hamidi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 333, Reasons for Order and Order, 14 March 2006.
Federal Court, Guang Sheng Han v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 432, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 4 April 2006.
Supreme Court, Lawrence Richard Hape v. Her Majesty the Queen,  2 S.C.R. 292, 2007 SCC 26, Judgment of 7 June 2007.
Federal Court of Appeal, Shahir Harb v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FCA 39, Judgment and Reasons for Judgment, 27 January 2003.
Federal Court, Rosmery Ivonne Hernandez Hernandez and Oscar Navarro v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 39, Reasons for Order, 25 January 2006.
Federal Court, Ramussen Torres Herrera v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 464, Reasons for Order and Order, 7 April 2005.
Federal Court, Hinzman v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2006 FC 420, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 31 March 2006.
Federal Court, Emmanuel Monoh Howbott v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 911, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 14 September 2007.
Federal Court, Hughey v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) 2006 FC 421, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 31 March 2006.
Federal Court, Ambroise Mapangu Ishaku v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), Case No. 2011 FC 44, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment of 14 January 2011.
Federal Court, Sujeewa Senani Priyanta Jayasinghe v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 193, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 22 February 2007.
Supreme Court, Provincial Court Judges’ Assn. of New Brunswick v. New Brunswick (Minister of Justice); Ontario Judges’ Assn. v. Ontario (Management Board); Bodner v. Alberta; Conférence des juges du Québec v. Quebec (Attorney General); Minc v. Quebec (Attorney General),  2 S.C.R. 286, 2005 SCC 44, Judgment of 22 July 2005.
Federal Court, Jose Pedro Justino v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 1138, Reasons for Judgment, 29 September 2006.
Federal Court, Olusegun (Segun) Adetokumbo (Adejokumb) Kabir, Akanni v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FCT 657, Reasons for Order and Order, 27 May 2003.
Federal Court, Salvator Kaburundi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 361, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 20 March 2006.
Federal Court, Raja Wijendra Tilak Kasturiarachchi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 7 March 2006 FC 295, Reasons for Order and Order, 2006.
Federal Court, Sutharsan Kathiravel v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FC 680, Reasons for Order, 29 May 2003.
Federal Court of Appeal, Omar Ahmed Khadr v. Canada (Minister of Justice and Attorney General of Canada, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service, and the Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police), 2007 FCA 182, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 10 May 2007.
- Supreme Court of Canada, Canada (Minister of Justice, Attorney General of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police) v. Omar Ahmed Khadr,  2 S.C.R. 125, 2008 SCC 28, Judgment of 23 May 2008.
- Supreme Court of Canada, Canada (Prime Minister of Canada, Minister of Foreign Affairs, Director of the Canadian Security Intelligence Service and Commissioner of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police) v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, 2010 SCC 3,  1 S.C.R. 44, Judgment of 29 January 2010.
Federal Court, Aseel Khan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FCT 309, Reasons for Order and Order, 14 March 2003.
- Federal Court, Lai Cheong Sing, Tsang Ming Na, Lai Chun Chun, Lai Chun Wai, Lai Ming Ming v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, 2004 FC 179, Reasons for Order, 3 February 2004.
- Federal Court of Appeal, Lai Cheong Sing, Tsang Ming Na, Lai Chun Chun, Lai Chun Wai and Lai Ming Ming v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FCA 125, Judgment, 11 April 2005.
- Federal Court, Lai Cheong Sing and Tsang Ming Na v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 361,  2 F.C.R. 3, Reasons for Order and Order, 5 April 2007.
Federal Court, Carlomagno Reyna Loayza v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 304, Reasons for Order and Order, 9 March 2006.
Federal Court, Almir Lukavica v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration and Minister of Public Safety), Case No. 2013 FC 118, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment of 1 February 2013.
Supreme Court, R. v. Lyttle,  1 S.C.R. 193, 2004 SCC 5, Judgment of 12 February 2004.
Federal Court, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Akash Deep Singh Maan, 2005 FC 1682, Reasons for Order, 9 December 2005.
- Federal Court, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Mahjoub (T.D.), 2001 FCT 1095,  4 F.C. 644, Reasons for Order, 15 October 2001.
- Federal Court, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Mahjoub (FC), 2003 FC 928, (2003),  1 F.C.R. 493, Reasons for Order, 30 July 2003.
- Federal Court, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Mahjoub, 2004 FC 1028, Reasons for Order and Order, 22 July 2004.
- Federal Court, Mahjoub v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (F.C.), 2005 FC 156,  3 F.C.R. 334, Reasons for Order, 31 January 2005.
- Federal Court, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Mahjoub, 2005 FC 1596, Reasons for Order and Order, 25 November 2005.
- Federal Court, Mahjoub v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (F.C.), 2006 FC 1503, (2006),  4 F.C.R. 247, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 14 December 2006.
- Federal Court, Mahjoub v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) (F.C.), 2007 FC 171,  F.C.J. No. 206, Reasons for Order, 15 February 2007.
- Federal Court, Mahjoub v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 1366, Reasons for Order and Order, 24 December 2007.
Federal Court, Vicky Keboulu Mankoto v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 294, Reasons for Order and Order, 25 February 2005.
Federal Court, Puglio Rudolfo Marinas Rueda et al v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 754, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 14 June 2006.
Federal Court, Ana Yolanda Martinez de Quijano v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 910, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 24 September 2007.
Federal Court, Fahmi Matti v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1561, Reasons for Order and Order, 18 November 2005.
Federal Court, Kenny Merceron v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 265, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 8 March 2007.
Federal Court, Mr. MJS v. Canada (Department of Citizenship and Immigration), Case No. 2013 FC 293, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment of 20 March 2013.
Federal Court, Mohammad Salah Chowdhury v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FCT 744, Reasons for Order, 13 June 2003.
Federal Court (Appeal Division), Jose Rodolfo Moreno and Edith Francisca Parada Sanchez v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), (C.A.), (1993),  1 F.C. 298, A-746-91, Reasons for Judgment, 14 September 1993.
Supreme Court, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Léon Mugesera, Case No. 2005 SCC 40, Judgment and Reasons for Judgment of 28 June 2005.
Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Canada (Her Majesty the Queen) v. Jacques Mungwarere, Case No. 2013 ONCS 4594, Reasons for Judgment of 5 July 2013.
Superior Court, Criminal Division, Province of Québec, District of Montréal, Her Majesty the Queen v. Désiré Munyaneza, Judgment of 22 May 2009.
Federal Court, Sivanesan Nagamany v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1554, Reasons for Order and Order, 17 November 2005.
Federal Court, Marie Nikuze v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), Case No. 2013 FC 33, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment of 15 January 2013.
Federal Court, James Alfred Obita v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 178, Reasons for Order and Order, 10 February 2006.
Federal Court, Idleh Djama Omar, Zahra Moussa Ahmed, Fatouma Meraneh Yonis, Deka Moussa Ahmed, Abdoulrazak Djama, Liiban Djama and Hodane Djama v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 FC 861, Reasons for Order, 17 June 2004.
Immigration and Refugee Protection Board, Gary Philip Peters v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and immigration), Case No. 0003-B2-02557, Record of an Admissibility Hearing under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act of 29 January 2013.
Federal Court, Alexandr Petrov v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 465, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 1 May 2007.
Federal Court, Betty Plaisir v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 264, Reasons for Order and Order, 8 March 2007.
Federal Court (Appeal Division), Saul Vicente Ramirez v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), F.C.J. No. 109, A-686-90, Reasons for Judgment, 7 February 1992.
- Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Nicholas Nikola Ribic v. Canada (Attorney General of Canada), 2004 CanLII 7091 (ON S.C.), Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 16 June 2004.
- Ontario Superior Court of Justice, Canada (Her Majesty the Queen) v. Nicholas Nikola Ribic, Court File Number 99-10018, Reasons for Sentence and Sentence, 15 September 2005.
- Court of Appeal for Ontario, Her Majesty the Queen v. Nicholas Nikola Ribic, 2008 ONCA 790, Docket No. C44148, Judgment of 24 November 2008.
Federal Court, Guilfo Elmer Viviano Rocha, Milagros del Carmen Matzza Rodriguez, Maria Fernando Viviano Matzza and Gianmarco Giovanni Viviano Matzza v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 304, Reasons for Order and Order, 25 February 2005.
Federal Court, Luis Angel Rojas, Angel Luis Rojas Graterol, Nora Isabel Graterol de Rojas and Luis Angel Rojas Graterol v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FCT 394, Reasons for Order and Order, 2 April 2003.
Federal Court of Appeal, Re Rudolph and Minister of Employment and Immigration, Judgment of 1 May 1992, published in International Law Reports, 1997, Vol. 104, p. 195.
Federal Court, Mario Roberto Cirilo Ruiz v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FC 1177, Reasons for Order and Order, 10 October 2003.
Federal Court, Tharcisse Ryivuze v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 134, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 8 February 2007.
Federal Court, Jadallah Sadakah v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1494, Reasons for Order and Order, 3 November 2005.
Federal Court, Hasan Saftarov, Lala Rizayeva, Nariman Saftarli and Sura Saftarli v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2004 FC 1009, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 21 July 2004.
Federal Court, Suman Raj Sapkota v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), Case No. 2013 FC 790, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment of 15 July 2013.
Federal Court, Swarnakumar Selvanayagam v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 836, Reasons for Order and Order, 29 June 2006.
General Court Martial, R. v. Captain R.A. Semrau, 2010 CM 4010, Docket No. 200945, Reasons for Sentence of 5 October 2010.
Court Martial Appeal Court, R. v. Major Anthony Gerald Seward, Judgment of 27 May 1996, CMAC-376.
Federal Court, Bakar Ould Sidna v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 1046, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 16 October 2007.
Supreme Court, R. v. Singh,  3 S.C.R. 405, 2007 SCC 48, Judgment of 1 November 2007.
Federal Court Trial Division, Sinnappu v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), Judgment of 14 February 1997, published in Federal Court Reports, 1997, Vol. 2, p. 791.
Federal Court (Appeal Division), Thalayasingam Sivakumar v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), (C.A.), (1993),  1 F.C. 433, A-1043-91, Reasons for Judgment, 4 November 1993.
Federal Court, Mohamed Wehbe Sleiman v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 285, Reasons for Order and Order, 24 February 2005.
Supreme Court, R. v. Smith,  1 S.C.R. 1045, Judgment of 25 June 1987.
Supreme Court, R. v. Spencer,  1 S.C.R. 500, 2007 SCC 11, Judgment of 8 March 2007.
Supreme Court, Suresh v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration),  1 S.C.R. 3, 2002 SCC 1, Judgment of 11 January 2002.
Federal Court, Jean Leonard Teganya v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 590, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 12 May 2006.
Federal Court, Paul Thomas v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 838, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 13 August 2007.
Federal Court, Francky Tilus v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 1738, Reasons for Order and Order, 23 December 2005.
Federal Court, Javier Ivan Torres Rubianes v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 1140, Reasons for Judgment, 29 September 2006.
Supreme Court, R. v. Turcotte,  2 S.C.R. 519, 2005 SCC 50, Judgment of 30 September 2005.
Federal Court, Nixon Valère v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 524, Reasons for Order and Order, 19 April 2005.
Supreme Court, Named person v. Vancouver Sun,  3 S.C.R 252, 2007 SCC 43, Judgment of 11 October 2007.
Supreme Court, Vancouver Sun (Re),  2 S.C.R. 332, 2004 SCC 43, Judgment of 23 June 2004.
Federal Court, Hugo Fernando Bonilla Vasquez v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2006 FC 1302, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 27 October 2006.
Federal Court, Alex Yale Ventocilla v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2007 FC 575, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 31 May 2007.
Federal Court, Ernesto Jesus Ponce Vivar v. Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness), 2007 FC 286, Reasons for Judgment and Judgment, 14 March 2007.
Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada, Immigration Division, Canada (Minister of Public Safety and Emergency Preparedness) v. XXXXX XXXXX XXXXX, Case No. 0003-A8-01602, Reasons and Decision of 17 January 2011.
Federal Court, Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) v. Raja Muzamal Kiani Yaqoob, 2005 FC 1017, Reasons for Order and Order, 22 July 2005.
Federal Court of Appeal, Narsullah Zazai v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FCA 303, Reasons for Judgment, 20 September 2005.
Federal Court, Carmen Maria Zoeger la Hoz, Alessia Maria Contreras Zoeger and Miguel Luis Contreras Magan v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2005 FC 762, Reasons for Order and Order, 30 May 2005.
Federal Court of Appeal, Mohamed Zrig v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration), 2003 FCA 178, Judgment and Reasons for Judgment, 7 April 2003.
Court of Cassation (Cour de Cassation), Criminal Chamber (Chambre Criminelle), Etat Centrafricain contre Ange Félix PATASSE et Autres, Judgment of 11 April 2006, Répertoire No. 006, Année 2006.
Conseil Constitutionnel (Constitutional Council), Décision No. 002/PCC/SG/001 sur l’exception d’inconstitutionnalité soulevée par les victimes des crimes et répressions politiques relative au dossier pénal ouvert contre les agents de la DDS de Monsieur HISSEINE HABRE (Decision No. 002/PCC/SG/001 on the exception of unconstitutionality brought by the victims of crimes and political repression regarding the criminal case open against agents of Mr. HISSEINE HABRE’s DDS [Documentation and Security Directorate]), Decision of 6 April 2001.
Supreme Court, Case of Insunza Bascuñán, Iván Sergio, Judgment of 24 August 1990.
Appeal Court of Santiago, Case of Benado Medwinsky, José Miguel, Judgment of 29 July 1980.
Corte Suprema, Segunda Sala (Supreme Court, Second Chamber), Case No. 2182-98, Judgment of 17 November 2004.
Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago, Octava Sala (Court of Appeal of Santiago, Eighth Chamber), Case No. 2.182-1998, Judgment of 27 July 2007.
Santiago Council of War, Case of Galaz Guzmán, Ernesto, and Others, Judgment of 30 July 1974.
Corte de Apelaciones de Santiago, Quinta Sala (Court of Appeal of Santiago, Fifth Chamber), Case No. 24.471-2005, Judgment of 5 September 2005.
Corte Suprema (Supreme Court), Case No. 469-98, Judgment of 9 September 1998.
Supreme Court, Case of Ruth Kries Saavedra, Judgment of 19 November 1993.
Corte Suprema, Sala Penal (Supreme Court, Criminal Law Chamber), Case No. 3125-04, Decision on Annulment of 13 March 2007.
Appeal Court of Santiago, Third Criminal Chamber, Case of Lumi Videla, Judgment of 26 September 1994.
War Crimes Military Tribunal of the Ministry of National Defence at Nanking, In re Takashi Sakai, Judgment of 29 August 1946, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 13, 1946, p. 222.
Council of State, Expediente 7013, Judgment of 13 December 1993.
Council of State, Expediente 9276, Judgment of 19 August 1994.
Council of State, Expediente 10941, Judgment of 6 September 1995.
Council of State, Expediente 11369, Judgment of 6 February 1997.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Plena, Sentencia C-004/03 (Constitutional Court, Plenary Chamber), Judgment of 20 January 2003.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Penal, Sentencia C-037/04 (Constitutional Court, Criminal Chamber), Judgment of 27 January 2004.
Constitutional Court, Sentencia C-092, Expediente RE-07, Judgment of 7 March 1996.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Penal, Sentencia C-095/07 (Constitutional Court, Criminal Chamber), Judgment of 14 February 2007.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Penal, Sentencia C-172/04 (Constitutional Court, Criminal Chamber), Judgment of 2 March 2004.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Plena, Sentencia C-203/05 (Constitutional Court, Plenary Chamber), Judgment of 8 March 2005.
Constitutional Court, Sentencia C-225/95, Expediente No. L.A.T.-40, Constitutional revision of Additional Protocol II and the Law 171 of 16 December 1994 implementing this protocol, Judgment of 18 May 1995.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Plena, Sentencia C-291/07 (Constitutional Court, Plenary Chamber), Judgment 25 April 2007.
Constitutional Court, Sentencia C-296, Judgment of 6 July 1995.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Plena, Sentencia C-370/06 (Constitutional Court, Plenary Chamber), Judgment of 18 May 2006.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Plena, Sentencia C-473 (Constitutional Court, Plenary Chamber), Judgment of 10 May 2005.
Constitutional Court, Sentencia C-572, Judgment of 7 November 1997.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Plena, Sentencia C-575/05 (Constitutional Court, Plenary Chamber), Judgment of 25 July 2005.
Constitutional Court, Sentencia C-578, Judgment of 4 December 1995.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Plena, Sentencia C-979/05 (Constitutional Court, Plenary Chamber), Judgment of 26 September 2005.
(Constitutional Court, Fourth Appeals Chamber), Judgment of 12 February 2004.
Corte Constitucional, Sala Primera de Revisión, Sentencia T-165/06 (Constitutional Court, First Appeals Chamber), Judgment of 7 March 2006.
Constitutional Court, Sentencia T-303, Judgment of 20 June 1997.
Constitutional Court, Sentencia T-409, Judgment of 8 June 1992.
Conseil Constitutionnel (Constitutional Council), Case No. 002/CC/SG, Decision of 17 December 2003.
District Court of Zadar, The Public Prosecutor against Momčilo Perišić, Milić Potpara, Ilija Branković, Stojan Vučković, Nikola Germanac, Spasoje Čojić, Duško Gojković, Predrag Tasić, Željko Batinić, Saša Djurović, Senaid Grbo, Mile Rudić, Dragomir Jokić, Jovan Milivojević, Miroslav Bobić, Božo Perić, Aleksandar Lazarević, Mirko Marčeta and Nebojša Filipović, Judgment of 24 April 1997, Case No. K. 74/96.
District Court of Split, RA. R. et al., Judgment of 26 May 1997, not published.
Tribunal Militaire de Garnison de l’Ituri-Bunia (Military Garrison Court of Ituri-Bunia), L’Auditeur Militaire de Garnison, Ministère Public et Parties civiles contre Kakado Barnaba Yonga Tshopena (Garrison Military Auditor, Public Prosecutor’s Office and civil parties against Kakado Barnaba Yonga Tshopena), RP No. 071/09, 009/010 and 074/010, RMP No. 885/EAM/08, RMP No. 1141/LZA/010, RMP No. 1219/LZA/010 and RMP No. 1238/LZA/010, Judgment of 9 July 2010.
Tribunal Militaire de Garnison de Kisangani (Military Garrison Court of Kisangani), L’Auditeur Militaire de Garnison, Ministère Public, contre Basele Lutula, alias Colonel Thoms; André Osumaka Loleka, alias Effacer le Tableau; Kipeleka Nyembo Bumba, alias Kata Moto; Okanga Likunda, alias Musique; et Koti Okeke, alias Koy Likoloya Ngomba (Garrison Military Auditor, Public Prosecutor’s Office against Basele Lutula, alias Colonel Thoms; André Osumaka Loleka, alias Effacer le Tableau; Kipeleka Nyembo Bumba, alias Kata Moto; Okanga Likunda, alias Musique; and Koti Okeke, alias Koy Likoloya Ngomba), RP No. 167/09, RMP No. 944/MBM/09, Judgment of 3 June 2009.
- Tribunal Militaire de Garnison de l’Ituri (Military Garrison Court of Ituri), l’Auditeur Militaire et les parties civiles contre le Capitaine Blaise Bongi Massaba (The Military Auditor and the civil parties v. Captain Blaise Bongi Massaba), RP N° 018/2006, R.M.P. N° 242/PEN/06, Judgment of 24 March 2006.
- Cour Militaire de la Province Orientale (Military Court of the Eastern Province), L’Auditeur Militaire Supérieur près de la Cour Militaire de la Province Orientale et parties civiles contre le Capitaine Blaise Bongi Massaba (The Higher Military Auditor at the Military Court of the Eastern Province and the civil parties v. Captain Blaise Bongi Massaba), RPA N° 030/06, Judgment on Appeals of 4 November 2006.
Tribunal Militaire de Garnison de l’Ituri (Military Garrison Court of Ituri), L’Auditeur Militaire et parties civiles contre Ives Kahwa Panga Mandro (The Military Auditor and the civil parties v. Ives Kahwa Panga Mandro), RP N° 039/2006, R.M.P. N° 227/PEN/2006, Judgment of 2 August 2006.
Auditeur Militaire près le Tribunal Militaire de Garnison du Haut-Katanga (Military Auditor at the Military Garrison Court of Haut-Katanga), L’Auditeur Militaire contre Kyungu Mutanga alias Gédéon (The Military Auditor v. Kyungu Mutanga alias Gédéon), R.M.P. N° 0468/MAK/2007, Décision de renvoi (Referral decision), 10 July 2007.
- Le Tribunal Militaire de Garnison du Haut Katanga (Military Garrison Court of Haut-Katanga), L’Auditeur Militaire de Garnison, Ministère Public et Parties civiles contre Kyungu Mutanga Gédéon et autres (The Garrison Military Auditor, Public Prosecutor’s Office and civil parties against Kyungu Mutanga Gédéon and Others), RP No. 0134/07, RMP No. 0468/MAK/2007, RMP No. 0512/MAK/08, RP No. 0182/09 and RMP No. 0686/MAK/09, first instance, Judgment of 5 March 2009.
Prosecutor v. Refik Sarić, Case No. S-3396-94, Judgment of 25 November 1994, published in Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen Weekly Law Reports, 1995, p. 838.
The Attorney General v. Refik Sarić, Case No. I 447/1994, Judgment of 15 August 1995, published in Ugeskrift for Retsvaesen Weekly Law Reports, 1995, p. 838, reported in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. I, 1998, p. 431.
Eastern High Court, 5th Department, Case No. S-239-06, Judge Advocate General v. Captain Annemette Hommel and others, Judgment, 6 July 2006.
Special Prosecutor’s Office, Transitional Government of Ethiopia, Mengistu and Others case, S.P.O Investigation File No. 401/85, Reply submitted in response to the objection filed by counsels for defendants, 23 May 1995.
- Cour de Cassation, Chambre Criminelle (Court of Cassation, Criminal Law Chamber), Appeal Nr. 02-80719, Judgment of 17 June 2003.
- Cour de Cassation, Chambre Criminelle (Court of Cassation, Criminal Law Chamber), Appeal Nr. 02-83986, Judgment of 17 June 2003.
Criminal Chamber, Barbie, Judgment of 6 October 1983, published in Revue Générale de Droit International Public, 1984, p. 507, summary with extracts in English published in International Law Reports, Vol. 78, 1988, p. 124.
Criminal Chamber, Barbie, Judgment of 26 January 1984, published in Revue Générale de Droit International Public, 1984, p. 971, summary with extracts in English published in International Law Reports, Vol. 78, 1988, p. 124.
Fédération Nationale des Déportés et Internés Résistants et Patriotes and Others v. Barbie, Judgment of 20 December 1985, published in Juris-Classeur Périodique, 1986, II, 20655, summary with extracts in English published in International Law Reports, Vol. 78, 1988, p. 124.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Metz, Trial of August Bauer, Judgment of 10 June 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 65.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Metz, Trial of Christian Baus, Judgment of 21 August 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 68.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Metz, Trial of Karl Benz, Judgment of 4 November 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 65.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Metz, Trial of Alois and Anna Bommer and their daughters, Judgment of 19 February 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 62.
Cour de Cassation, Chambre Criminelle (Court of Cassation, Criminal Law Chamber), Appeal Nr. 92-82273, Judgment of 1 April 1993, published in Bulletin Criminel 1993 N° 143, p. 351.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Metz, Trial of Willi Buch, Judgment of 2 December 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 65.
- Cour de Cassation, Chambre Criminelle (Court of Cassation, Criminal Chamber), Appeal No. 04-87245, Judgment of 10 January 2007, published in Bulletin Criminel 2007 N° 7, p. 17.
- Cour de Cassation, Chambre Criminelle (Court of Cassation, Criminal Chamber), Appeal No. 07-86412, Judgment of 9 April 2008.
Cour de Cassation, Chambre Criminelle (Court of Cassation, Criminal Law Chamber), Appeal Nr. 02-85379, Judgment of 23 October 2002, published in Bulletin Criminel 2002 N° 195, p. 725.
Cour de Cassation, Chambre Criminelle (Court of Cassation, Criminal Law Chamber), Appeal Nr. 03-84653, Judgment of 4 January 2005, published in Bulletin Criminel 2005 N° 1, p. 1.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Dijon, Trial of Franz Holstein and Twenty-Three Others, Judgment of 3 February 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. VIII, 1949, p. 22.
Javor, Kussuran, Softic, Alic and Mujdzic v. X, Order establishing partial lack of jurisdiction and the admissibility of a civil suit, 6 May 1994.
Javor and Others, Judgment of 24 November 1994.
Javor and Others, Judgment of 26 March 1996.
Cour de Cassation, Chambre Criminelle (Court of Cassation, Criminal Law Chamber), Appeal Nr. 00-87215, Judgment of 13 March 2001, published in Bulletin Criminel 2001 N° 64, p. 218.
Tribunal administratif de Paris (Paris Administrative Court), Case No. 08-11025, Judgment of 25 June 2010.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Metz, Trial of K. Lingenfelder, Judgment of 11 March 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 67.
In re Wenceslas Munyeshyaka, Judgment of 20 March 1996.
In re Wenceslas Munyeshyaka, Judgment of 6 January 1998, published in Revue Générale de Droit International Public, Vol. 102, 1998, p. 825, English translation of part of the decision published in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 1, 1998, p. 598.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Metz, Trial of Elizabeth Neber, Judgment of 6 April 1948, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 65.
Cour de Cassation, Chambre Criminelle (Court of Cassation, Criminal Chamber), Appeal No. 08-81262, Judgment of 7 May 2008.
Military Tribunal at Strasbourg, In re Rieger, Judgment of 5 May 1948, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 15, 1948, p. 483.
General Tribunal at Rastadt of the Military Government for the French Zone of Occupation in Germany, In re Roechling and Others, Judgment of 30 June 1948, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 15, 1948, p. 398.
Le Procureur de le République près du Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris (Prosecutor of the Republic at the Tribunal de Grande Instance of Paris), Letter to lawyer of authors of criminal complaint of 16 November 2007.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Metz, Trial of Philippe Rust, Judgment of 5 March 1948, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 71.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Clermont-Ferrand, Trial of Hans Szabados, Judgment of 23 June 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 59.
Permanent Military Tribunal at Strasbourg, In re Wagner and Others, Judgment of 3 May 1946, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 13, 1946, p. 385.
Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), Second Senate (Zweiter Senat), 2 BvR 1506/03, Order of 5 November 2003.
- Regional Court of Bonn (Landgericht Bonn), First Civil Law Chamber (Erste Zivilkammer), 1 O 361/02, Judgment of 10 December 2003.
- Higher Regional Court of Cologne (Oberlandesgericht Köln), Seventh Civil Law Senate (Siebter Zivilsenat), 7 U 8/04, Judgment of 28 July 2005.
- Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Third Civil Law Senate (Dritter Zivilsenat), III ZR 190/05, Judgment of 2 November 2005.
Regional Court of Aachen (Landgericht Aachen), Grand Criminal Chamber (1. Schwurgerichtskammer), 52 Ks 45 Js 18/83 10/09, Judgment of 23 March 2010.
Federal Prosecutor General at the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgeneralanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof), Charges against Two Alleged Leading Officials of the “Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda” (FDLR) (Anklage gegen zwei mutmaßliche Führungsfunktionäre der “Forces Démocratiques de Libération du Rwanda” (FDLR)), 32/2010, Press release of 17 December 2010.
Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht), Tenth Senate (Zehnter Senat), 10 C 7.09, Judgment of 16 February 2010.
Regional Court of Frankfurt/Main (Landgericht Frankfurt a.M.), 5/27 KLs 7570 Js 203814/03 (4/04), Judgment of 20 December 2004.
Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), X and Others v. Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Judgment of 26 June 2003, published in Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2003, Vol. 48, pp. 3488–3493.
Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), First Chamber of the Second Senate (Erste Kammer des Zweiten Senats), 2 BvR 1476/03, Decision of 15 February 2006.
Supreme Court of Bavaria (Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht), Public Prosecutor v. Novislav Djajić, Case No. 3 St 20/96, Judgment of 23 May 1997, published in American Journal of International Law, Vol. 92, 1998, p. 528; extracts of the original German version published in Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 1998, Vol. 6, p. 392.
Imperial Court (Reichsgericht), The Dover Castle, Judgment of 4 June 1921, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 2, 1923-24, p. 429.
Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Third Criminal Law Senate (Dritter Strafsenat), AK 3/10, Decision of 17 June 2010.
Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), Second Senate (Zweiter Senat), 2 BvR 955/00, 1038/01, Order of 26 October 2004.
- Hanseatic Higher Regional Court of Hamburg (Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg), Third Criminal Law Senate (Dritter Strafsenat), 2 BJs 88/01-5- / 2 StE 4/02-5-, Judgment of 19 February 2003.
- Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Third Criminal Law Senate (Dritter Strafsenat), 3 StR 218/03, Judgment of 4 March 2004.
- Hanseatic Higher Regional Court of Hamburg (Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg), Fourth Criminal Law Senate (Vierter Strafsenat), 2 BJs 88/01 / 2 StE 4/02-5 / IV-1/04, Judgment of 19 August 2005.
- Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Third Criminal Law Senate (Dritter Strafsenat), 3 StR 139/06, Judgment of 16 November 2006.
- Hanseatic Higher Regional Court of Hamburg (Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg), Seventh Criminal Law Senate (Siebter Strafsenat), 2 BJs 88/01-5 / 2 StE 4/02-5 / 7-1/06, Judgment of 8 January 2007.
- Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), First Chamber of the Second Senate (Erste Kammer des Zweiten Senats), 2 BvR 2557/06, Decision of 10 January 2007.
- Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Third Criminal Law Senate (Dritter Strafsenat), 3 StR 145/07, Decision of 2 May 2007.
Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Deutsches Rotes Kreuz v. Rettungsdienst Süd/Nord GmbH, Judgment of 23 June 1994, published in Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofs in Zivilsachen, 1995, 126. Band, No. 28, p. 287.
- Higher Social Court of Baden-Württemberg (Landessozialgericht Baden-Württemberg), Sixth Senate (Sechster Senat), L 6 V 1912/01, Judgment of 13 November 2003.
- Federal Social Court (Bundessozialgericht), Ninth Senate (Neunter Senat), B 9a/9 V 8/03 R, Judgment of 24 November 2005.
Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) (Second Chamber), Case No. 2 BvL 33/93 (Forced Labour), Judgment of 13 May 1996, published in Entscheidungen des Bundesverfassungsgerichts, Vol. 94, p. 315.
Federal Prosecutor General at the Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgeneralanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof), Investigation proceedings against Colonel (Oberst) Klein and Company Sergeant Major (Hauptfeldwebel) Wilhem because of suspected offences under the International Crimes Code and other offences (Ermittlungsverfahren gegen Oberst Klein und Hauptfeldwebel Wilhelm wegen des Verdachts einer Strafbarkeit nach dem VStGB und anderer Delikte), Termination of proceedings pursuant to § 170 para. 2 sentence 1 of the Penal Procedure Code (Einstellung des Verfahrens gemäß § 170 Abs. 2 Satz 1 StPO), 3 BJs 6/10-4, 16 April 2010.
Higher Regional Court of Dresden (Oberlandesgericht Dresden), General Devastation (Germany) case, Judgment of 21 March 1947, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 15, 1948, p. 417.
Regional Court of Hamburg (Landgericht Hamburg), 15th Civil Law Chamber (15. Zivilkammer), 315 O 794/05, Judgment of 27 April 2006.
Office of the Prosecutor Frankfurt (Oder) (Staatsanwaltschaft Frankfurt (Oder)), Senior Public Prosecutor (Oberstaatsanwalt), Investigation Proceedings against Soldiers of the Federal Armed Forces Discontinued (Ermittlungsverfahren gegen Bundeswehrsoldaten eingestellt), Press release of 19 May 2009.
Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht), First Chamber of the Second Senate (Erste Kammer des Zweiten Senats), 2 BvR 1379/01, Decision of 28 June 2004.
Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), First Criminal Law Senate (Erster Strafsenat), 1 StR 57/10, Decision of 25 October 2010.
Court Martial North (Truppendienstgericht Nord), Joachim A. case, Case No. N 8 BL a 2/84, Decision of 26 June 1984.
Prosecution v. Nikola Jorgić, Judgment of 26 September 1997, Case No. 2 StE 8/96 (unpublished).
Prosecution v. Nikola Jorgić, Case No. 3 StR 215/98, Judgment of 30 April 1999, published in Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht, Vol. 8, 1999, p. 396, and in Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofs in Strafsachen, Vol. 45, p. 65.
Complaint about the infringement of the Constitution of J., Case No. 2 BvR 1290/99, Decision of 12 December 2000, published in Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift, 2001, p. 76.
Higher Administrative Court for the Federal Land of Bavaria (Bayerischer Verwaltungsgerichtshof), 11 B 06.30084, Judgment of 21 October 2008.
Prosecution v. Djuradj Kusljić, Case No. 6 St 1/99, Judgment of 15 December 1999.
Prosecution v. Djuradj Kusljic, Case No. 3 StR 244/00, Decision of 21 February 2001, published in Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2001, p. 2732.
Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht), Second Military Service Senate (Zweiter Wehrdienstsenat), BVerwG 2 WD 12.04, Judgment of 21 June 2005.
Imperial Court (Reichsgericht), The Llandovery Castle, Judgment of 16 July 1921, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 2, 1923-24, p. 436.
- Federal Prosecutor General at the Federal Court of Justice (Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof), No German Investigations Concerning the Reported Incidents in Abu Ghraib/Iraq (Keine deutschen Ermittlungen wegen der angezeigten Vorfälle in Abu Ghraib/Irak), 6/2005, Press release of 10 February 2005.
- Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart (Oberlandesgericht Stuttgart), Dismissal of Motion for Judicial Decision Concerning the Reported Incidents in Abu Ghraib/Iraq (Verwurf des Antrags auf gerichtliche Entscheidung wegen der angezeigten Vorfälle in Abu Ghraib/Irak), 5 Ws 109/05, Decision of 13 September 2005.
Federal Prosecutor General at the Federal Court of Justice (Generalbundesanwalt beim Bundesgerichtshof), No Investigation Proceedings Concerning the Reported Incidents in Abu Ghraib/Iraq and Guantánamo Bay/Cuba (Kein Ermittlungsverfahren wegen der angezeigten Vorfälle in Abu Ghraib/Irak und in Guantánamo Bay/Kuba), 9/2007, Press release of 27 April 2007.
Higher Administrative Court for the Federal Land North Rine-Westphalia (Oberverwaltungsgericht für das Land Nordrhein-Westfalen), Personal Injuries (Occupied Germany) case, Judgment of 9 April 1952, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 19, 1957, p. 632.
Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Case on payments of compensations refused with regard to the London Agreement on German External Depts of 27 February 1953, Judgment of 26 February 1963, Case No. VI ZR 94/61, published in Monatsschrift des deutschen Rechts, 1963, p. 492, and in Rechtsprechung zum Wiedergutmachungsrecht, 1963, p. 525.
Office of the Prosecutor Zweibrücken (Staatsanwaltschaft Zweibrücken), Decision of 23 January 2009, 4129 Js 12550/08, published in Neue Zeitschrift für Wehrrecht, 2009, Vol. 4, pp. 169–172.
- Administrative Court of Berlin (Verwaltungsgericht Berlin), Ninth Chamber (Neunte Kammer), 9 A 49.00, Judgment of 11 April 2006.
- Higher Administrative Court of Berlin-Brandenburg (Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg), Eleventh Senate (Elfter Senat), 11 N 42.06, Decision of 6 September 2007.
Federal Social Court (Bundessozialgericht), Ninth Senate (Neunter Senat), B 9a V 5/05, Judgment of 6 July 2006.
Prosecution v. Maksim Sokolović, Case No. 2 StE 6/97, Judgment of 29 November 1999.
Prosecution v. Maksim Sokolović, Case No. 3 StR 372/00, Judgment of 21 February 2001, published in Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2001, Vol. 37, p. 2728 and Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofs in Strafsachen, Vol. 46, p. 292.
- Leipzig Court, In re Karl Stenger and Benno Cruisus, published in Claud Mullins, The Leipzig Trials, London, H.F. & Witherby, 1921, p. 151.
Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Prosecution v. X, Case No. 3 StR 475/85, Judgment of 22 January 1986, published in Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht, 1986, p. 313.
Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof), Prosecution v. Polizeiwachtmeister P., Case No. 3 StR 765/52, Judgment of 19 March 1953, published in Entscheidungen des Bundesgerichtshofs in Strafsachen, Vol. 5, 1954, p. 239.
Court of Appeal of Athens, Case No. 1122/1999, 1999, published in Nomiko Vima, Vol. 47, 2001, pp. 972–975.
Prefecture of Voiotia v. Federal Republic of Germany, Case No. 137/1997, Judgment of 30 October 1997, reported in American Journal of International Law, Vol. 92, 1998, p. 765, published in Nomiko Vima, Vol. 46 (1998), pp. 246–253.
Greece, Court of First Instance of Larissa, Case No 93/1998, 1998, published in Nomiko Vima, Vol. 46 (1998), pp. 1098–1102.
Court of Appeal of Athens, Case 1122/1999, 1999, published in Nomiko Vima, Vol. 47, 2001, pp. 972–975.
Court of Appeal of Piraeus, Judgment No. 894/2001, published in Armenopoulos, 2002, pp. 420–428.
Supreme Special Court, Federal Republic of Germany v. Miltiadis Margellos, Judgment No 6/2002 of 17 September 2002, published in the Yearbook of the Institute of International Relations 2001–2002, pp. 688–705.
Constitutional Court of Hungary, Decision No. 53/1993, 13 October 1993, Magyar Közlöny 1993, No. 147.
Constitutional Court of Hungary, Judgment No. 36/1996, 4 September 1996, Magyar Közlöny 1996/75, p. 4673.
Supreme Court, Narottam Dass Beshtoo BP Dobhal v. Union of India & Others, 16 August 1994, (1994), Supreme Court Cases, 1994, Supp (3), pp. 264–266.
High Court of Gujarat, Ktaer Abbas Habib Al Qutaifi and Anr. v. Union of India (UOI) and Ors., 1999 Cri. L. J. 919, Order of 12 October 1998.
Supreme Court, Civil Appeal, Ous Kutilingal Achudan Nair and Others v. Union of India and Others, No. 1821 of 1974, Judgment of 20 November 1975, (1976), Supreme Court Cases, 1976, Supp (2), pp. 780–783.
Supreme Court, Noor Aga v. State of Punjab, Case No. 1034, Judgment of 9 July 2008, available at http://judis.nic.in/supremecourt/imgst.aspx?filename=31821 (last accessed 12 December 2016).
Supreme Court, State (N.C.T. of Delhi) v. Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru (2005), 11 SCC 600, Judgment of 4 August 2005.
High Court of Gauhati, Peoples Union for Human Rights v. Union of India (UOI), AIR 1992 Gau 23, Judgment of 20 March 1991.
http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~warcrime/East_Timor_and_Indonesia/Indictments_and_judgments/Indonesia_Soares_Judgment.htm (last accessed on 16 July 2010).
http://www.mahkamahkonstitusi.go.id/putusan/putusan_sidang_eng_Putusan%20065-PUU-II-2004%20%28UU%20Pengadilan%20HAM%29.pdf (last accessed on 16 July 2010).
Temporary Court-Martial at Amboina, In re Motosuke, Judgment of 28 January 1948, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 15, 1948, p. 682.
Supreme Court of Israel, Court of Criminal Appeals, A. and Other v. State of Israel, CrimA 6659/06, Judgment of 11 June 2008.
Supreme Court of Israel, A. v. State of Israel, Adm. Det. App. 7750/08, Judgment of 23 November 2008.
Supreme Court of Israel, A. v. State of Israel, ADA 6434/09, Judgment of 19 August 2009.
High Court, Abu Awad v. Commander of the Judea and Samaria Region, Case H.C. 97/79, Judgment of 12 November 1979, 33(3) Piskei Din [Reports of the Israel Supreme Court] 309, excerpt in English published in Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 9, 1979, p. 343.
Military Court, Military Prosecutor v. Abu-Kabar et al., Judgment of 1972, published in Selected Judgments of Military Courts, Vol. 2, 1974, p. 24 and Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 7, 1977, p. 265.
High Court, Alia Muhammed Abu-Rijwa v. The Minister of Defence, Case H.C. 5267/92, Judgment of 15 November 2000, not published, for an unofficial Hebrew text, see Tak-El 2000(3), 2698.
High Court of Justice, Abu Safiya and Others v. Minister of Defense and Others, HCJ 2150/07, Judgment of 29 December 2009.
High Court of Justice, Adalah – The Legal Centre for Arab Minority Rights in Israel and Others v. GOC Central Command, IDF, and Others, HCJ 3799/02, Judgment of 6 October 2005.
High Court of Justice, Adalah Legal Centre for Arab Minority Rights in Israel and others v. Government of Israel and others, HCJ 8276/05, 8338/05 and 11426/05, Supreme Court of Israel, Judgment of 12 December 2006.
High Court of Justice, Adalah Legal Centre for Arab Minority Rights in Israel and Others v. Minister of Interior and Others, HCJ 7052/03, 7102/03, 7642/03, 7643/03, 8099/03, 8263/03 and 10650/03, Judgment of 14 May 2006.
High Court of Justice, Kamal Mohammed Hassin Adris v. The Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank and The Commander of IDF Forces in the Gaza Strip, HCJ 9534/03, Judgment of 29 October 2003.
High Court, Abd al Affo et al. v. Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank et al., Case H.C. 785/87, 945/87 and 27/88, Judgment of 10 April 1988, published in International Legal Materials, Vol. 29, No. 1, 1990, p. 139.
High Court of Justice, Kipah Mahmad Ahmed Ajuri, Abed Alnasser Mustafa Ahmed Asida, Centre for the Defence of the Individual v. IDF Commander in West Bank, IDF Commander in Gaza Strip and Bridget Kessler, HCJ 7015/02; Amtassar Muhammed Ahmed Ajuri, Centre for the Defence of the Individual, Association for Civil Rights in Israel v. IDF Commander in Judaea and Samaria, IDF Commander in Gaza Strip and Bridget Kessler, HCJ 7019/02, Judgment of 3 September 2002.
High Court of Justice, Abd el Rahman el Ahmar v. the Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank and the Legal Appellate Judge Pursuant to the Order Regarding Administrative Detentions (Temporary Provision), HCJ 1139/04, Judgment of 26 February 2004.
High Court, Al Nawar v. Minister of Defence, Case H.C. 574/82, Judgment of 11 August 1985, published in Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 16, 1986, pp. 321–328.
High Court of Justice, Hassan Ma’aruf Ratheb Ala’una, Physicians for Human Rights and the Association for Civil Rights in Israel v. Commander of IDF Forces in Judea and Samaria, HCJ 2847/03, HCJ 2847/03, Judgment of 14 July 2003.
High Court of Justice, Muhammad Albassiouni, Ibrahim Abu ‘Onzeh, Noel Tilech, Fuzi Alsh’ar, Ibrahim Alsh’ar, Jamal Qashteh, Nimer Albassiouni, ‘Issam Qashteh, Mas’ud Qashteh, Isma’il ‘Ashur, Ruhi Znun, Eyman Alsa’id and Ibrahim Albassiouni v. Commander of IDF Forces, HCJ 4573/04, Judgment of 14 May 2004.
High Court of Justice, Gaber Albasyouni Ahmad and Others v. The Prime Minister and Other, HCJ 9132/07, Judgment of 30 January 2008.
Military Court of Appeals for Judea and Samaria, Omar Farid Hassan Alkam v. the Military Prosecutor, Appeal 4006/07, Judgment of 6 November 2007.
High Court of Justice, Mohammed Almandi, MK Ahmed Tibi, MK Mohammed Barakeh v. the Minister of Defense, the Chief Of Staff, and the Commander of the Central Command of the Israeli Defense Forces, HCJ 3451/02, Judgment of 25 April 2002.
High Court of Justice, Rami Dhaqar Ismail Anbar and Others v. Government Operations Coordinator Southern Command and Others, HCJ 5268/08, and Adalah – The Legal Centre for Arab Minority Rights in Israel and Others v. The Minister of Defense and Others, HCJ 5399/08, Judgment of 9 December 2009.
High Court of Justice of Israel, Commander of IDF Forces in Judea and Samaria and Judge of the Military Court of Appeals, HCJ 11026/05, Judgment of 22 December 2005.
Military Court of Appeals, Military Prosecutor v. Alexander Ayalon, Appeal No. 62/03, Judgment of 27 May 2003.
High Court, Ayub v. Minister of Defence, Judgment of 15 March 1979, Case H.C. 606/78, published in Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 9, 1979, pp. 337–342.
High Court, sitting as a High Court of Justice, Petitioners: MK Muhammad Barake et al. v. Respondents: Minister of Defence of Israel et al., Ruling of 14 April 2002.
High Court of Justice, Beit Sourik Village Council v. the Government of Israel and the Commander of the IDF Forces in the West Bank, HCJ 2056/04, Judgment of 30 June 2004.
High Court of Justice, the Center for the Defense of the Individual, Adalah, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, B’tselem, Kanon, Addameer and Alhaq v. the Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank, HCJ 3278/02, Judgment of 18 December 2002.
High Court of Justice, Committee for the Development of Hebron and Others v. State of Israel and Others, HCJ 4661/06 Judgment of 27 June 2006.
Military Court of Appeals for Judea and Samaria, Hassan Yusef Daud Dar-Halil v. The Military Prosecutor, Appeal 3335/07, Judgment of 29 May 2008.
High Court of Justice, Head of Deir Samit Village Council and Others v. Commander of the IDF Forces in the West Bank and Other, HCJ 3969/06, Judgment of 22 October 2009.
High Court of Justice, Salah Diriya, Muhammad ‘Ith (Jit), Ziad Hamed and HaMoked: Center for the Defence of the Individual v. Commander of Ofer Military Detention Facility and Commander of IDF Forces in Judea and Samaria, HCJ 11198/02, Decision of 16 February 2003.
High Court of Justice, Taha Ramadan Ratheb Diyouk v. The Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank and The Commander of IDF Forces in the Gaza Strip, HCJ 9535/03, Judgment of 12 November 2003.
- District Court of Jerusalem, Attorney-General of the State of Israel v. Eichmann, Judgment of 12 December 1961, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 36, 1968, p. 5.
- Supreme Court, Attorney-General of the State of Israel v. Eichmann, Judgment of 29 May 1962, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 36, 1968, p. 277.
District Court of Tel Aviv, Attorney-General v. Yehezkel Ben Alish Enigster, Judgment of 4 January 1952, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 18, 1951, p. 540.
High Court, Applications H.C. 5100/94, H.C. 4054/95, H.C. 6536/95, H.C. 5188/96, H.C. 7563/97, H.C. 7628/97 and H.C. 1043/99, Joint Judgment of 6 September 1999.
High Court of Justice, Gisha and Others v. The Minister of Defense, HCJ 4258/08, Judgment of 5 June 2008.
Military Court of Appeals for Judea and Samaria, Ahmad Fadel Ahmad Hassin v. The Military Prosecutor, Misc Appl 1779/08, Judgment of 21 November 2010.
High Court of Justice, Hebron Local Council and Others v. State of Israel and Others, HCJ 5968/05 and 6353/05, Judgment of 1 March 2006.
High Court of Justice, Yoav Hess, Mossi Raz and Yesh Gvul v. the Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank, GOC Central Command and the State of Israel, HCJ 10356/02; the Hebron Municipality, the Building Renovation Committee in Hebron, Abd Elhafez Edris, Hajj Hadr Raba’i, Na’aman Shukri Da’ana, Kamal Mustafa Jaber, Ahmed Hamed Jaber and Mahmoud Abed Jaber v. the Commander of IDF Forces in the Judea and Samaria Area, the Civil Administration for the Judea and Samaria Area and the Government of Israel, HCJ 10497/02; Judgment of 4 March 2004.
High Court of Justice, IDF West Bank Military Commander v. Judge of the Military Court of Appeals in the Judea and Samaria Area and Others, HCJ 6845/05, Judgment of 4 August 2005.
Jerusalem District Court, The State of Israel v. Tariq Issa Issawi, PLC 40211-03-10, Judgment of 21 April 2010.
High Court of Justice, Jamal Mustafa Yousef’Abdullah (Hussin) v. IDF West Bank Military Commander, HCJ 7605/05, Judgment of 14 December 2005.
Military Court at Ramallah, Military Prosecutor v. Omar Mahmud Kassem and Others, Judgment of 13 April 1969, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 42, 1971, p. 470.
High Court, Kawasme et al. v. Minister of Defence et al., [Second Phase], Case H.C. 698/80, Judgment of 4 December 1980, 35(1) Piskei Din [Reports of the Israel Supreme Court] 617, excerpt in English published in Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 11, 1981, p. 349.
High Court of Justice, Iad Ashak Mahmud Mar’ab, Ahsan Abed Al Ftah Id Dahdul, Weesam Abed Al Ftah Id Dahdul, Center for the Defense of the Individual, B’tselem, The Association for Human Rights in Israel, Physicians for Human Rights, Adalah, Kanon and Public Committee Against Torture v. IDF Commander in the West Bank and Judea and Samaria Brigade Headquarters, HCJ 3239/02, Judgment of 5 February 2003.
High Court of Justice, Mayor of Dahariya and Others v. Commander of the IDF in the West Bank and Others, HCJ 1748/06, 1845/06 and 1856/06, Judgment of 14 December 2006.
Supreme Court, Muhammad Abd-al-Hamud Srur and Others v. State of Israel, Misc Criminal Requests 8780/06 and 8984/06, Decision of 20 November 2006.
Nazareth District Court, State of Israel v. Muhammad Srur, Suliman Hussein and Maher Kurani, S.C. Nos. 548/06, 549/06 and 550/06, Decision of 4 December 2007.
High Court of Justice, Municipality of Bethlehem and Others v. State of Israel and Others, HCJ 1890/03, Judgment of 3 February 2005.
High Court of Justice, Murar and Others v. the Military Commander in the West Bank and Other, HCJ 9593/04, Judgment of 26 June 2006.
High Court, Mahmud Nazal et al. v. IDF Commander of the Judea and Samaria Region, Case H.C. 513/85 and 514/85, Judgment of 29 September 1985, 39(3) Piskei Din [Reports of the Israel Supreme Court] 645, excerpt in English published in Israel Yearbook on Human Rights , Vol. 16, 1986, p. 329.
The Chief Military Prosecutor v. Lance Corporal Ofer, Major Malinki Shmuel and Others, Case concerning the events of 29 October 1956 in Kafr Qassem, Judgment of 13 October 1958, Case MC (Central) 3/57, Psakim Judgments of the District Courts of Israel], Vol. 17, p. 90.
The Chief Military Prosecutor v. Lance Corporal Ofer, Major Malinki Shmuel and Others, Case concerning the events of 29 October 1956 in Kafr Qassem, Judgment of 3 April 1959, Appeal No. 279-283/58, Psakim [Judgments of the District Courts of Israel], Vol. 44, p. 362; publication of the English version of the judgment in Palestine Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 2, 1985, p. 69-116.
High Court of Justice, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel and Others v. Commander of the IDF Forces in Gaza, South Command and Others, HCJ 11105/07, Judgment of 8 January 2008, available at http://www.phr.org.il/default.asp?PageID=110&ItemID=174 (last accessed on 17 July 2012).
High Court of Justice, Physicians for Human Rights and Others v. the Commander of IDF Forces in the Gaza Strip, HCJ 4764/04, Judgment of 30 May 2004.
High Court of Justice, Physicians for Human Rights v. The Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank and Badia Ra’ik Suabuta v. The Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank, HCJ 2936/02 and HJC 2941/02, Judgment of 8 April 2002.
High Court of Justice, Physicians for Human Rights-Israel and Others v. Coordinator of Government Activities in the Territories and Other, HCJ 7231/07, Judgment of 19 March 2008.
High Court of Justice, Physicians for Human Rights v. the Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank and the Commander of IDF Forces in Gaza, HCJ 2117/02, Judgment of 28 April 2002.
High Court of Justice, Physicians for Human Rights and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights v. Doron Almog, O.C. Southern Command and the Minister of Defence, HCJ 8990/02, Judgment of 27 April 2003.
High Court of Justice, Physicians for Human Rights and Others v. Prime Minister of Israel and Others, HCJ 201/09, and Gisha Legal Centre for Freedom of Movement and Others v. The Minister of Defence and Others, HCJ 248/09, Judgment of 19 January 2009.
Supreme Court, The Public Committee against Torture in Israel and Others v. Government of Israel and Others, HCJ 769/02, Judgment of 14 December 2006.
High Court of Justice, Shadi Talal Sadr and Ibrahim Ali Shanaita v. the Commander of IDF Forces in the West Bank, HCJ 5994/03 and HCJ 5995/03, Judgment of 27 July 2003.
Supreme Court of Israel, Court of Criminal Appeals, Khaled Ali Sallem Said v. State of Israel, CrimA 74406/08, Judgment of 7 November 2008.
High Court, Sakhwil et al. v. Commander of the Judea and Samaria Region, Judgment of 6 November 1979, Case H.C. 434/79, published in Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 10, 1980, p. 345.
High Court of Justice, Louie Salame, Abd el Razeq Faraj and Hail Abu Hassan v. The Commander of IDF Forces in the Judea and Samaria Area and Judge of the Military Court of Appeals, HCJ 5784/03, HCJ 6024/03 and HCJ 6025/03, Judgment of 11 August 2003.
High Court of Justice, Ghanem Toufik Salah Suelema, Munzar Mohammed Yunis Juaba, Louie Mohammed Sabhi Daud, Raja Ata Mohammed Harzalla, Samer Abu Zina, Rassem Hatab Hassan Mustafa, Hassem Hamdalla Uda, Shadi Ismail Ayash, Sami Sus, Hani Hamdi el Rajbi, Rami Hajigi and Nasser Salame v. The Commander of IDF Forces in the Judea and Samaria Area and The Commander of IDF Forces in the Gaza Strip Area, HCJ 9586/03, HCJ 9590/03, HCJ 9621/03, HCJ 9688/03, Judgment of 25 December 2003.
District Court of Tel Aviv, State of Israel v. Mustafa Dirani, CC 1461/00, Decision of 9 December 2005.
Military Court, Military Prosecutor v. Swarka and Others, Judgment of 1974, Case EA/412/71, published in Selected Judgments of Military Courts, Vol. 3, 1974, p. 206 and Israel Yearbook on Human Rights, Vol. 7, 1977, p. 264.
High Court of Justice, Halel Yassin, Ibrahim Puzi Abrahim Siam, Iad Nebil Aish Alaba’ad, Sha’ar Manjed Yusef Mansuer, Mustafa Ahmed Basharat, Mahmus Shabana, Ramzi Mahmud Fiad, Adalah, Kanun, the Center for the Defense of the Individual, B’tselem, Addameer, Al-Haq, Almrah Center, Nadi Alasir Alfalstini, the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel and Physicians for Human Rights v. the Commander of the Kziot Military Camp-Kziot Detention Facility and the Minister of Defense, HCJ 5591/02, Judgment of 18 December 2002.
High Court of Justice, Yesh Din-Volunteers for Human Rights and Others v. Military Commander in the West Bank and Others, HCJ 2690/09, Judgment of 28 March 2010.
Supreme Court, Zaharan Yunis Muhammad Mara’abe and Others v. Prime Minister of Israel and Others, HCJ 7957/04, Judgment of 15 September 2005.
Supreme Court of Cassation (Corte Suprema di Cassazione), Italy v. Abdelaziz and others, Final Appeal Judgment, No. 1072, (2007) 17 Guida al Diritto 90, 17 January 2007.
Tribunal at Livorno, In re Valerio Ercole, Judgment, No. 439, 13 April 2000.
Court of Appeals at Florence, In re Valerio Ercole, Judgment, No. 652, 22 February 2001.
Supreme Court of Cassation (Corte Suprema di Cassazione), Ferrini v. Germany, Appeal Decision, No. 5044/4, ILDC 19, 11 March 2004.
In re Hass and Priebke, Judgment in Trial of First Instance, No. 322, 22 July 1997, published in Rassegna della Giustizia Militare, Nos. 1-2-3, 1999, p. 103.
In re Hass and Priebke, Judgment on Appeal, No. 24, 7 March 1998, published in Rassegna della Giustizia Militare, Nos. 4-5-6, 1999, p. 25.
In re Hass and Priebke, Judgment in Trial of Third Instance, No. 1295, 16 November 1998, published in Rassegna della Giustizia Militare, Nos. 4-5-6, 1999, p. 145.
Military Tribunal of Rome, In re Kappler, Judgment, 20 July 1948, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 15, 1948, p. 471.
Supreme Court of Cassation (Corte Suprema di Cassazione), Presidency of the Council of Ministers v. Markovic and others, Decision, Application for Preliminary Order on Jurisdiction, No. 8157, ILDC 293, 85 Rivista di diritto internazionale 799 (2002), 8 February 2002.
In re Priebke, Judgment in Trial of First Instance, No. 305, 1 August 1996, published in Rassegna della Giustizia Militare, Nos. 1-2-3, 1999, p. 27.
In re Priebke, Judgment Cancelling Verdict of First Instance (Trial of Second Instance), 15 October 1996, published in Rassegna della Giustizia Militare, Nos. 1-2-3, 1999, p. 79.
Military Tribunal of Verona, In re Alois Schintlholzer ed altro, Judgment of 15 November 1988, published in Rassegna della Giustizia Militare, 1989, p. 344.
X. and al. v. The State of Japan, Claim for Apology for the Kamishisuka Slaughter of Korean case, Judgment in Trial of First Instance, 27 July 1995, published in Hanrei Jiho, No. 1563, p. 125.
Judgment on Appeal, 7 August 1996, published in Horitsu Shinbun, No. 1244, p. 6, English version of judgment published in Japanese Annual of International Law, Vol. 40, 1997, p. 116.
Tokyo District Court, Civil Division No. 6, Sjoerd Lapré et al. v. Japan, Claims for compensation from Japan arising from injuries suffered by former POWs and civilian internees of the Netherlands, Judgment of 30 November 1998, Claim No. 1218 (Civil), 1994, published in Hanrei Taiumzu, Vol. 991, p. 262, publication of the English version of the judgment in Japanese Annual of International Law, Vol. 42, 1999, p. 143.
Tokyo District Court, Civil Division No. 31, Arthur Titherington et al. v. Japan, Claims for compensation from Japan arising from injuries suffered by former POWs and civilian internees of the ex-allied Powers, Judgment of 26 November 1998, Claim No. 1382 (Civil), 1995.
Tokyo District Court, Henson et. al. v. Japan, Judgment of 9 October 1998, published in Shomu Geppo, Vol. 45, 1597, publication of the English version of the judgment in Japanese Annual of International Law, Vol. 42, 1999, p. 170.
Shimonoseki Branch, Section 1, Ko Otsu Hei incidents case, Judgment of 27 April 1998, published in Hanrei Jiho, No. 1642, 21 August 1998, p. 24.
Appeal of the Ko Otsu Hei incidents case, Judgment of 29 March 2001, published as “The Kanpu-Judgment” in Hanrei Jiho, No. 1759, 2001.
Chiba District Court, Religious Organisation Hokekyoji et al. v. Prefectural Governor of Chiba, 10 April 1956, published in Gyoseijiken Saibanreishu, Vol. 7, p. 988.
District Court of Tokyo, Ryuichi Shimoda et Aal. v. The State, Judgment of 7 December 1963, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 32, 1966, p. 626.
Compensation claim of the Siberian detainees, Tomoya Kanbayashi et al. v. Japan, Judgment in Trial of First Instance, 4 April 1989, Case Nos. 1981 (WA) 4024, 1981 (WA) 8983, 1982 (WA) 731 and 1985 (WA) 12166, published in Japanese Annual of International Law, Vol. 32, 1989, p. 125.
Judgment in Trial of Second Instance, 5 March 1993, published in Japanese Annual of International Law, Vol. 37, 1994, p. 129.
Judgment in Trial of Third Instance, 13 March 1997, published in Hanrei Jiho, No. 1607, p. 11.
District Court of Tokyo, Tokyo Suikosha v. Tokyo Mesonic Lodge Association et al., Judgment of 28 February 1966, published in Kakyusaibansho Minji Saibanreishu, 1966, Vol. 17, p. 108.
District Court of Tokyo, Takada Sadakichi v. State, Judgment of 28 January 1959, published in Gyoseijiken Saibanreishu, 1959, Vol. 10, p. 139.
Fukuoka District Court, Zhang Baoheng and Others v. Mitsui Mining Company and the State of Japan, Judgment of 26 April 2002.
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (UK), Public Prosecutor v. Oie Hee Koi and connected appeals,  A.C. 829, 4 December 1967, available at http://www.icrc.org/ihl-nat.nsf/46707c419d6bdfa24125673e00508145/9060d45de85f16dcc1256a1d0030f720?OpenDocument (last accessed 20 May 2014).
Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (UK), Mohamed Ali and another v. Public Prosecutor, Judgment of 29 July 1968, published in Law Reports, Vol. 1, Appeal Cases, 1969, pp. 430–455.
Mohamad Ezam bin Mohd Nor & Others v. Menteri Dalam Negeri & Anor, Criminal Application No. 44-88 of 2002, High Court (Ipoh), Judgment of 24 March 2003,  2 MLJ 364.
Abd Malek bin Hussin v. Borhan bin Hj Daud and Others, Civil Suit No. S3(S5)-21-20 of 1999, High Court (Kuala Lumpur), Judgment of 18 October 2007,  1 MJL 368.
Federal Court of the First Circuit, Decision, 11 January 2001.
Supreme Court, Division Bench, Asta Raj Bajracharya v. Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers, Ministry of Defense, Army Headquarters, Bhairav Nath Barrack of Nepal[’s] Army, Raj Dal Barrack and Brigadier General of Raj Dal Barrack, Writ no. 3520, Order, 31 August 2007.
Supreme Court, Division Bench, Liladhar Bhandari and Others v. Prime Minster and Office of Council of Ministers, Singhadurbar, Kathmandu and Others, Writ No. 0863 of the Year 2008, Order, 7 January 2009.
Supreme Court, Division Bench, General Secretary of Human Rights, Environment and Alternative Development and General Secretary of Human Rights Concern Center v. the Honorable Prime Minister, His Majesty’s Government, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary System, Honorable Minister of Law, Secretariat of Council of Ministers, Parliament Secretariat and National Assembly, Writ Nos. 2942 and 2059, Order, 9 January 2004.
Supreme Court, Division Bench, Writ Nos. 3575, 100, 104, 323, 500, 45, 41, 155, 162, 164, 167, 97, 110, 111, 142, 211, 250, 223, 262, 378, 418, 485, 617, 632, 635, 54(0002) 0004 and 2588/0038, Order, 9 January 2004.
Hague District Court, Landelijk Jurispr Nr: BA9575, Judgment of 25 June 2007.
Special Court of Cassation, In re SS Member Ahlbrecht, Judgment of 17 February 1947, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 14, 1947, p. 196.
Council of State (Raad van State), Administrative Law Division, Case between A.M. Ahmed, of Somali nationality, and the State Secretary of Justice, Case No. R02.92.2322, Judgment of 20 December 1996.
Temporary Court-Martial at Batavia, Trial of Washio Awochi, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XIII, 1949, p. 122.
Special Court of Cassation, In re Burghof, Judgment of 17 October 1949, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 16, 1949, p. 551.
Council of State (Raad van State), Administrative Law Division, Case between S. Chantirakumar, of Sri Lankan nationality, and the State Secretary of Justice, Case Nos. R02.93.5977 and R02.93.6246, Judgment of 2 September 1997.
In re Esau, Judgment of 27 April 1948, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 16, 1949, p. 482.
Judgment on Appeal of 21 February 1949, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 16, 1949, p. 482.
Special Court (War Criminals) at Arnhem, In re Enkelstroth, Judgment of 20 February 1948, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 15, 1948, p. 685.
Special Criminal Court at The Hague, In re Fiebig, Judgment of 28 June 1949, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 16, 1949, p. 487.
Council of State (Raad van State), Administrative Law Division, Case between M. Hamoud, stateless, and the State Secretary of Justice, Case No. R02.94.0802, Judgment of 11 September 1997.
- Hague Court of Appeal, Landelijk Jurispr Nr: AZ7143, Judgment of 29 January 2007.
- Hague District Court, Landelijk Jurispr Nr: AV1163, Judgment of 14 October 2005.
District Court of The Hague, J. T. v. State of the Netherlands, Judgment of 13 April 1949, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 16, 1949, p. 378.
Hague District Court, Landelijk Jurispr Nr: BB8462, Judgment of 24 July 2007.
Supreme Court, Prosecution v. Darko Knesević, Judgment of 11 November 1997, Case No. 3717, published in Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, 1998, p. 463; unofficial English translation published in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 1, 1998, pp. 601–607.
(East Indies) Temporary Court-Martial of Makassar, In re Koshiro, Judgment of 5 February 1947, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 14, 1947, p. 210.
(East Indies) Temporary Court-Martial at Makassar, In re Motomura and Others, Judgment of 18 July 1947, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 14, 1947, p. 309.
(East Indies) Temporary Court-Martial at Makassar, In re Notomi Sueo and Others, Judgment of 4 January 1947, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 14, 1947, p. 208.
District Court of The Hague (Special Criminal Chamber), In re Pilz, Judgment of 21 December 1949 and Special Court of Cassation, Judgment of 5 July 1950, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 17, p. 391.
In re Rauter, Judgment of 4 May 1948, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 15, 1948, p. 434.
In re Rauter, Judgment of 12 January 1949, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 16, 1949, p. 526.
Supreme Court (Minor Offences Division), In re Ernest Andreas Josephus Maria van A., Judgment of 15 May 1979, published in Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, 1979, p. 1543, Case No. 484.
Special Court of Cassation, In re Rohrig, Brunner and Heinze, Judgment of 15 May 1950, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 17, 1956, p. 393.
Rotterdam District Court, Landelijk Jurispr Nr: AO7287, Judgment of 24 March 2004.
Special Court of Cassation, In re “Silbertanne” Murders, Judgment of 24 June 1946, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 13, 1946, p. 397.
- Hague District Court, Landelijk Jurispr Nr: AX6406, Judgment of 23 December 2005.
- Hague Court of Appeal, Landelijk Jurispr Nr: BA6734, Judgment of 9 May 2007.
Special Court of Cassation, In re Wingten, Judgment of 6 July 1949, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 16, 1949, p. 484.
Special Court of Cassation, In re Zimmermann, Judgment of 21 November 1949, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 16, 1949, p. 552.
Trial of Willy Zuhlke, Judgment of 3 August 1948, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 15, 1948, p. 415, Case No. 122 and p. 417, Case No. 123.
Trial of Willy Zuhlke, Judgment of 6 December 1948, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 15, 1948, p. 493, Case No. 156, p. 494, Case No. 157, p. 499, Case No. 158, p. 533, Case No. 175; both judgments published in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XIV, 1949, p. 139.
- District Court at Auckland, Janfire Julia Wakim v. Lieutenant General Mosche Ya’alon, Decision on ex parte application for issue of warrants to arrest, 27 November 2006, CIV-2006-004.
- District Court at Auckland, Janfire Julia Wakim v. Lieutenant General Mosche Ya’alon, Final Decision, 29 November 2006, CIV-2006-004.
High Court Auckland, X v. Refugee Status Appeals Authority, CIV 2006-404-2650, 6, Judgment of 14 July 2006,  NZAR 533.
Supreme Court of New Zealand, Zaoui v. Attorney-General (No. 2), Judgment of 12 April, 13 April and 21 June 2005,  1 NZLR 289 (Supreme Court).
Supreme Court, Pius Nwaoga v. State, Judgment of 3 March 1972, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 52, 1979, p. 494.
Supreme Court, The Public Prosecuting Authority v. AAAA Tøyen Tannlegevakt AS, HR-2010-00816-A, Case No. 2010/253, Judgment of 12 May 2010.
In re Richard Wilhelm Hermann Bruns and Others, Judgment of 20 March 1946, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 13, 1946, p. 391, and in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. III, 1948, p. 15.
In re Richard Wilhelm Hermann Bruns and Others, Judgment of 3 July 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. III, 1948, p. 15.
In re Gerhard Friedrich Ernst Flesch, Judgment of 2 December 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. VI, 1948, p. 111.
In re Gerhard Friedrich Ernst Flesch, Decision, 12 February 1948, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. VI, 1948, p. 118.
Eidsivating lagmannsrett (Court of Appeal), In re Hans, Judgment of 17 January 1947, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 14, 1947, p. 305.
Supreme Court, Public Prosecutor v. Klinge, Judgment of 27 February 1946, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 13, 1946, p. 262.
http://www.icrc.org/ihl-nat.nsf/46707c419d6bdfa24125673e00508145/bbbdeef461f8c2bec125755b0051e82b/$FILE/Sentence on the misuse of the Red Cross Emblem.PDF (last accessed on 28 July 2010).
District Court of Oslo, The Public Prosecuting Authority v. Mirsad Repak, Case No. 08-018985MED-OTIR/08, Judgment of 2 December 2008.
Borgarting Lagmannsrett (Court of Appeal), The Public Prosecuting Authority v. Mirsad Repak, Case No. LB-2009-24039, Judgment of 12 April 2010.
Supreme Court of Norway, The Public Prosecuting Authority v. Mirsad Repak, Case No. HR-2010-2057-P, Judgment of 12 March 2011.
Supreme Court of Pakistan, Abdul Baqi Baluch v. The Government of Pakistan through the Cabinet Secretary, Rawalpindi and others, Judgment of 24 May 1968, published in All Pakistan Legal Decisions, 1968 Supreme Court 313.
Supreme Court, Liaqat Hussain v. Federation of Pakistan, Judgment of 22 February 1999, published in All Pakistan Legal Decisions, 1999 Supreme Court 504.
Supreme Court of Pakistan, Aftab Shaban Mirani v. President of Pakistan, Judgment of 26 June 1998, Supreme Court Monthly Review, 1998 SCMR 1863.
Lahore High Court, Shahida Faisal v. Federation of Pakistan, Judgment of 14 June 2000, Separate Opinion of Judge Mian Nazir Akhtar, published in All Pakistan Legal Decisions, 2000 Lahore 508.
Sentencia del Pleno Jurisdiccional del Tribunal Constitucional del Perú (Plenary Decision of the Constitutional Court of Peru), Exp. No. 0002-2008-PI/TC, 9 September 2009.
Resolución del Tribunal Constitucional (Resolution of the Consitutional Court), Exp. No. 00002-2008-PI/TC, 17 September 2009.
Tribunal Constitucional, Primera Sala (Constitutional Court, First Chamber), Case No. 0275-2005-PHC/TC, Judgment of 9 February 2005.
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República, Sala Penal Nacional (Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic, National Criminal Chamber), Case No. 034-06, Judgment of 2 October 2007.
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República, Primera Sala Penal Transitoria (Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic, First Provisional Criminal Chamber), R.N. No. 2779-2006, Judgment of 18 December 2007.
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República, Sala Penal Permanente (Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic, Permanent Criminal Chamber), Case No. 1598-2007, Judgment of 24 September 2007.
Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional (Decision of the Constitutional Court), Case 0012-2006-HC/TC, Judgment of 15 December 2006.
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República, Sala Penal Especial (Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic, Special Criminal Chamber), Case No. A.V. 19-2001, Judgment of 7 April 2009.
Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional (Decision of the Constitutional Court), Case No. 2798-04-HC/TC, Judgment of 9 December 2004.
Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional (Decision of the Constitutional Court), Case No. 2488-2002-HC/TC, Judgment of 18 March 2004.
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República, Sala Penal Permanente (Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic, Permanent Criminal Chamber), Case No. 18-2004, Judgment of 17 November 2004.
- Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional (Decision of the Constitutional Court), Case 4677-2005-HC/TC, Judgment of 12 August 2005.
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República, Segunda Sala Penal Transitoria (Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic, Second Provisional Criminal Chamber), Case No. 5835-2006, Judgment of 26 November 2007.
Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional (Decision of the Constitutional Court), Case No. 010-2002-AI/TC, Judgment of 3 January 2003.
Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional (Decision of the Constitutional Court), Case 679-2550-PA/TC, Judgment of 2 March 2007.
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la República, Sala Penal Nacional (Supreme Court of Justice of the Republic, National Criminal Chamber), Case No. 034-06, Judgment of 23 November 2007.
Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court), Case No. 00021-2009-PI/TC, Resolution of 5 November 2009.
Tribunal Constitucional (Constitutional Court), Case No. 00018-2009-PI/TC, Resolution of 23 March 2010.
Supreme Court, Lt. General Lisandro Abadia, Maj. General Arturo Enrile and Col. Dionisio Santiago v. Court of Appeals and Lt. Col Marcelino Malajacan, G.R. No. 105597, Judgment of 23 September 1994.
Supreme Court, Capt. Gary Alejano, Capt. Nicanor Faeldon, Capt. Gerardo Gambala, Lt. Sg James Layug, Capt. Milo Maestrecampo, Lt. Sg Antonio Trillanes IV, Homobono Adaza, and Roberto Rafael (Roel) Pulido v. Gen. Pedro Cabuay, Gen. Narciso Abaya, Sec. Angelo Reyes and Sec. Roilo Golez, G.R. No. 160792, Judgment of 25 August 2005.
Supreme Court, Benito Astorga v. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 154130, Judgment of 1 October 2003.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Armando Binamira, G.R. No. 110397, Judgment of 14 August 1997.
Supreme Court, Victoria G. Callangan v. People of the Philippines, G.R. No. 153414, Judgment of 27 June 2006.
Supreme Court, Teodoro Cantos (Teodoro Tatishi) v. Lt. General Wilhelm D. Steyer, G.R. No. L-492, Judgment of 28 June 1946.
Supreme Court, Fernando Cayao v. Judge Justiniano A. Del Mundo, A.M. No. MTJ-93-813, Judgment of 15 September 1993.
Supreme Court, Tomas H. Cosep v. People of the Philippines and Sandiganbayan, G.R. No. 110353, Judgment of 21 May 1998.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Antolin Cuizon y Ortega, Steve Pua y Clofas and Paul Lee y Wong, G.R. No. 109287, Judgment of 18 April 1996.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Mario K. Espinosa, G.R. Nos. 153714-20, Judgment of 15 August 2003.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Aaron Flores, Sulpecio Silpao and Edgar Villeran, G.R. No. 116488, Judgment of 31 May 2001.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Cristina M. Hernandez, G.R. No. 108028, Judgment of 30 July 1996.
Supreme Court, Southern Hemisphere Engagement Network Inc. on behalf of the Southsouth Network (SSN) for Non-State Armed Group Engagement, and Atty. Soliman M. Santos, JR v. Anti-Terrorism Council, the Executive Secretary, the Secretary of Justice, the Secretary of Foreign Affairs, the Secretary of National Defense, the Secretary of the Interior and Local Government, the Secretary of Finance, the National Security Adviser, the Chief of Staff of the Armed Forces of the Philippines, and the Chief of the Philippine National Police, G.R. No. 178552, Judgment of 16 July 2007.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Marvic Genosa, G.R. No. 135981, Judgment of 29 September 2000.
Supreme Court, Kuroda v. Jalandoni et al., G.R. No. L-2662, Judgment of 26 March 1949.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Lope Liwanag y Buenaventura, Randy Simbulan y Garcia and Ramil Vendibil y Castro, G.R. No. 120468, Judgment of 15 August 2001.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Vicente D. Lucero and Benjamin Santiago, G.R. No. 64323-24, Judgment of 31 May 1991.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Leon Lumilan, Antonio Garcia and Fred Orbiso, G.R. No. 102706, Judgment of 25 January 2000.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Julio Manliguez, Shirley Ignacio y Agatia and Lucia Guiral, G.R. No. 91745, Judgment of 4 March 1992.
Supreme Court, The People of the Philippines v. Dario Margen et al., Judgment of 30 March 1950, published in Reports of Cases Decided by the Supreme Court of the Philippines from 11 November 1949 to 31 March 1950, Vol. 85, pp. 839–842.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Fernando Monje y Rosario, Lordino Maglaya y Alvarez, Christopher Bautista y Rosario and Michael Castro y Osias, G.R. No. 146689, Judgment of 27 September 2002.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Marlon Parazo y Francisco, G.R. No. 121176, Judgment of 8 July 1999.
Supreme Court, People of the Philippines v. Hon. Oscar B. Pimentel, (as Judge, RTC of Makati, Metro Manila, Branch 148) and Antonio A. Tujan, G.R. No. 100210, Judgment of 1 April 1998.
Supreme Court, Paulino Valencia v. Atty. Arsenio Fer Cabanting; Constancia L. Valencia v. Atty. Dionisio C. Antiniw, Atty. Eduardo U. Jovellanos and Atty. Arsenio Fer. Cabanting; Lydia Bernal, v. Atty. Dionisio C. Antiniw, A.M. Nos. 1302, 1391 and 1543, Judgment of 26 April 1991.
Supreme National Tribunal of Poland at Poznan, In re Greiser, Judgment of 7 July 1946, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 13, 1946, p. 387.
Supreme National Tribunal of Poland, Trial of Obersturmbannfürher Rudolf Franz Ferdinand Hoess, Judgment of 11–29 March 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. VII, 1948, p. 11.
Constitutional Court, Ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the constitutionality of Article 14.1 of the Federal Law on Interment and Burial of 12 January 1996, as amended, as well of the Decree No. 164 of 20 March 2003 on interment of persons whose death was caused by the interception of terrorist acts carried out by them, 28 June 2007.
Constitutional Court, Decision concerning verification of the constitutionality of the Federal Law on cultural property transferred into the USSR in consequence of World War II, and being found in the territory of the Russian Federation, Decision of 20 July 1999, N 12-P, published in Sobranya Zokonodatyelstva RF, No. 30, 26 July 1999, p. 3989, English translation published in Yearbook of International Humanitarian Law, Vol. 2, 1999, pp. 403–408.
Basmanny District Court, Abdullah Khamzaev v. Ministry of Defence and Russian Government, Judgment of 11 May 2001.
Constitutional Court, Legality of the Presidential Decrees and Federal Government’s Resolution on the Situation in Chechnya, Judgment of 31 July 1995, published in Human Rights Law Journal, Vol. 17, No. 3-6, 15 October 1996, pp. 133–139, available at http://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/default.aspx?pdffile=CDL-INF%281996%29001-e (last accessed on 8 January 2015).
Military High Court, Office of the Military Prosecutor General v. George Rwigamba, Goodman Bagurete Ruzibeza, Emmanuel Rutayisire, Vincent Sano, Case No. RMP 0019/AMG/NR/97, RP0033/CM/KGL/97, Judgment of 12 September 1997.
Military High Court, Office of the Military Prosecutor General v. Claver Rugambwa, Jean Bosco Rutikanga, Sylvestre Kabango, Deus Karakasi, Evariste Nsabimana, Amiel Tuyisenge, Case No. RMP 0020/AMG/LIKJ/97, RP0033/CM/KGL/97, Judgment of 1 December 1997.
Ministère Public et François Diouf v. Hissène Habré, Judgment No. 135, 4 July 2000.
Souleymane Guengueng and Others v. Hissène Habré, Judgment No. 14, 20 March 2001.
The Azanian Peoples’ Organization (Azapo) and Others v. Truth and Reconciliation Commission and Others, Cape Provincial Division, Case No. 4895/96, Judgment of 6 May 1996.
The Azanian Peoples’ Organization (Azapo) v. The President of the Republic of South Africa, Case CCT 17/96, Judgment of 25 July 1996.
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2004/13.pdf (last visited 27 April 2010).
http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2005/10.pdf (last visited 28 April 2010).
Supreme Court of Appeal, Lombo v. African National Congress, Supreme Court of Appeal of South Africa, (17/2001)  ZASCA 61, Judgment of 30 May 2002, available at http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZASCA/2002/61.pdf (last visited 29 April 2010).
Constitutional Court, Mohamed and Another v. President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (CCT 17/01)  ZACC 18; 2001 (3) SA 893 (CC), Judgment of 28 May 2001, available at http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2001/18.pdf (last visited 29 April 2010).
Appeal Division, Rex v. Werner and Another, Judgment of 20 May 1947.
- Supreme Court, Criminal Chamber, Section 1, Case No. 1240/2006, Judgment of 11 December 2006.
- Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Penal, Sección 1 (Supreme Court, Criminal Chamber, Section 1), Appeal No. 2629/2009, Judgment of 13 July 2010.
- Audiencia Nacional, Sala de lo Penal, Sección 2 (National High Court, Criminal Chamber, Section 2), Appeal No. 118/2009, Judgment of 9 June 2009.
- Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Penal, Sección 1 (Supreme Court, Criminal Chamber, Section 1), Appeal No. 1979/2009, Judgment of 4 March 2010.
Sala de lo Penal de la Audiencia Nacional, Sección 1a, Auto confirmando la jurisdicción de España para conocer de los crímenes de genocidio y terrorismo cometidos durante la dictadura chilena, Judgment of 5 November 1998, published in La Ley, Revista Jurídica Española, 1998, No. 11.191, pp. 1850–1853.
Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Contencioso, Sección Tercera (Supreme Court, Administrative Chamber, Third Section), Appeal No. 1298/2010, Judgment of 30 June 2011.
Tribunal Supremo, Sala de lo Penal (Supreme Court, Criminal Chamber), Appeal No. 857, Judgment of 6 October 2011.
- High Court of Vavuniya, Akilan v. The Attorney General, Case No. 62/2010 (Writ), Order of 24 May 2010.
- High Court of Vavuniya, Akilan v. The Attorney General, Case No. 62/2010 (Writ), Order of 17 June 2010.
Supreme Court, Channa Peiris v. The Attorney General, Judgment of 17 June 1994, published in Sri Lanka Law Reports, 1994, Vol. I, pp. 1–151.
Supreme Court, Kumaranatunga v. Samarasinghe, Judgment of 3 February 1983, published in Sri Lanka Law Reports, 1983, Vol. 2, pp. 63–83.
Supreme Court, Machchavallavan v. OIC, Army Camp, Plantain Point, Trincomalee and others, Judgment, 31 March 2005, published in Sri Lanka Law Reports, 2005, Vol. I, pp. 341–358.
Supreme Court, Sivalingam v. Sub Inspector Jayasekera, Officer-in-Charge, The Inspector General of Police, and The Attorney General, S.C. (F/R) No. 326/2008, Judgment of 10 November 2010.
Supreme Court, Vinayagamoorthy v. Army Commander, Judgment, 20 December 1996, published in Sri Lanka Law Reports, 1997, Vol. I, pp. 113–140.
Supreme Court, Weerawansa v. The Attorney General, Judgment of 3 August 2000, published in Sri Lanka Law Reports, 2000, Vol. I, pp. 387–420.
Court of Criminal Appeal, Wijesuriya v. The State, Judgment of 5 November 1973, published in New Law Reports, 1973, Vol. 77, pp. 25–68.
http://www.iclklamberg.com/files/Arklovdomen.pdf (last visited 13 May 2010).
Federal Criminal Court, A. v. Office of the Attorney General, B. and C., Case No. BB.2011.140, Judgment of 25 July 2012.
Military Tribunal at Lausanne, Prosecutor v. Goran Grabež, Judgment of 18 April 1997, published in American Journal of International Law, Vol. 92, 1998, p. 78.
Federal Court, Judgment 1A.36/1997, 28 April 1997, published in Arrêts du Tribunal Fédéral, Vol. 123, Part II, p. 175.
Division 2, Prosecutor v. Fulgence Niyonteze, Burgomaster (Mayor) of a municipality in Rwanda, Judgment of 30 April 1999.
Geneva, Judgment of 26 May 2000.
Yverdon-les-Bains, Judgment of 27 April 2001.
Federal Court, Second Division for Administrative Law, J. Spring v. Swiss Confederation, Judgment of 21 January 2000, published in Arrêts du Tribunal Fédéral, Vol. 126, Part II, p. 145.
Uganda Human Rights Commission at Kampala, Complaint UHCR/G/288/2000, Sgt Jackson Cherop v. Attorney General, Decision of 14 April 2004.
Constitutional Court, Constitutional Petitions Nos. 02 of 2002 and 08 of 2002, Uganda Law Society and Jackson Karugaba v. The Attorney General, Judgment of 5 February 2008.
Uganda Human Rights Commission at Gulu, Complaint No. UHCR/G/199/2001, Denis Ojera v. Attorney General, Decision of 12 May 2004.
Constitutional Court, Opinion of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in the case of the constitutional submission by the President of Ukraine on issuing opinion related to compliance of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court to the Constitution of Ukraine, Case No 1-35/2001, 11 July 2001.
Kyiv Administrative Court of Appeal, Person 1 v. the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine, the President of Ukraine with Verkhovna Rada as third party, Case No. 22-а-11342/08, Decision of 17 February 2009.
House of Lords, A and others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department,  UKHL 56, Judgment of 16 December 2004.
House of Lords, A and others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (No. 2),  UKHL 71, Judgment of 8 December 2005.
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), R. (on the application of Abassi) v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs,  EWCA Civ 1598, Judgment of 6 November 2002.
England and Wales High Court of Justice (Queen’s Bench Division), Babar Ahmad, Haroon Rashid Aswat v. The Government of the United States of America,  EWHC 2927 (Admin.), Judgment of 30 November 2006.
House of Lords, R. (on the application of Al-Jedda) v. Secretary of State for Defence,  UKHL 58, Judgment of 12 December 2007.
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Hilal Abdul Razzaq Ali Al Jedda v. Secretary of State for the Home Department,  EWCA Civ 758, Judgment of 8 July 2010.
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), R. (on the application of Al-Rawi) v. Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs,  EWCA Civ 1279, Judgment of 12 October 2006.
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), Faisal Attiyah Nassar Al-Saadoon and Kha Laf Hussain Mufdhi v. Secretary of State for Defence,  EWCA Civ 7, Judgment of 21 January 2009.
House of Lords, R. (Al-Skeini and others) v. Secretary of State for Defence,  UKHL 26, Judgment of 13 June 2007.
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), BE (Iran) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department,  EWCA Civ 540, Judgment of 20 May 2008.
England and Wales High Court of Justice (Queen’s Bench Division), Bici v. Ministry of Defence,  EWHC 786(QB), Judgment of 7 April 2004.
England and Wales High Court of Justice (Divisional Court), Vincent Brown aka Vincent Bajinja, Charles Munyaneza, Emmanuel Nteziryayo and Celestin Ugirashebuja v. the Government of Rwanda and the Secretary of State for the Home Department,  EWHC 770 (Admin), Judgment of 8 April 2009.
Military Court at Hamburg, Trial of Hans Eck and Four Others (The Peleus Trial), Judgment of 17–20 October 1945, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. I, 1947, p. 1.
Military Court at Essen, The Essen Lynching Case, Judgment of 21–22 December 1945, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. I, 1947, p. 88.
England and Wales High Court of Justice (Queen’s Bench Division), The Queen (on the application of Maya Evans) v. Secretary of State for Defence,  EWHC 1445 (Admin), Judgment of 25 June 2010.
City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court, The Government of the Republic of Serbia v. Ejup Ganić,  EW Misc 11 (MC), Judgment of 27 July 2010.
Military Court at Hannover, Trial of Arno Heering, Judgment of 24–26 January, 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XI, 1949, p. 79.
House of Lords, R. v. Jones and others; Ayliffe and others v. Director of Public Prosecutions; Swain v. Director of Public Prosecutions,  UKHL 16, Judgment of 29 March 2006.
Supreme Court, R (on the application of JS) (Sri Lanka) (Respondent) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant),  UKSC 15, Judgment of 17 March 2010.
Military Court at Lüneburg, In re Kramer and Others (Auschwitz and Belsen concentration camps case), Judgment of 17 November 1945, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 13, 1946, p. 267.
Court No. 5 of the Curiohaus at Hamburg, Trial of Frits Knöchlein (Le Paradis case), Judgment of 11–25 October 1948, unreported, quoted in Marjorie M. Whiteman, Digest of International Law, Volume 10, Department of State Publication 8367, Washington, D.C., April 1968, p. 391.
Military Court at Hannover, Trial of Willi Mackensen, Judgment of 28 January 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XI, 1949, p. 81.
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), MH (Syria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and DS (Afghanistan) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department,  EWCA Civ 226, Judgment of 24 March 2009.
UK, House of Lords, Regina v. Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others Ex Parte Pinochet Regina v. Evans and Another and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others Ex Parte Pinochet (On Appeal from a Divisional Court of the Queen’s Bench Division), Lord Browne-Wilkinson, Lord Goff of Chieveley, Lord Hope of Craighead, Lord Hutton Lord Saville of Newdigate, Lord Millett, Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Judgment of 24 March 1999.
England and Wales Court of Appeal (Civil Division), No. 1 QD (Iraq) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, No. 2 AH (Iraq) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department,  EWCA Civ 620, Judgment of 24 June 2009.
Military Court at Wuppertal, Trial of Major Karl Rauer and Six Others, Judgment of 18 February 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IV, 1948, p. 113.
Military Court at Elten, Trial of Hans Renoth and Three Others, Judgment of 8–10 January 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XI, 1949, p. 76.
Military Court at Wuppertal, Trial of Werner Rohde and Eight Others, Judgment of 29 May–1 June 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. V, 1948, p. 54.
Military Court at Almelo, Trial of Otto Sandrock and Three Others (Almelo Trial), Judgment of 24–26 November 1945, published in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. I, 1947, p. 35.
Old Bailey, London, R. v. Anthony Sawoniuk, Judgment of 1 April 1999.
Supreme Court of Judicature, Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), R. v. Anthony Sawoniuk, Case No. EWCA Crim 9, Judgment on Appeal of 10 February 2000.
Military Court at Lüneberg, In re Student, Judgment of 10 May 1946, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 13, 1946, p. 296.
Military Court at Brunswick, Trial of Generaloberst Nickolaus von Falkenhorst, Judgment of 29 July–2 August 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XI, 1949, p. 18.
Military Court at Hamburg, Trial of Helmuth von Ruchteschell, Judgment of 5–21 May 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 82.
Court Martial held at Portsmouth Military Court Centre, The Queen v. Jody Oliver Wheelhouse and Mark Jonathan Leader, Sentencing of 7 April 2010.
Military Court at Hamburg, Trial of Hans Wickman, Judgment of 29 November 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XV, 1949, p. 133.
Bow Street Magistrates’ Court, The Government of the Russian Federation v. Akhmed Zakaev, Decision of 13 November 2003.
Military Court at Hamburg, Trial of Bruno Tesch and Two Others (The Zyklon B case), 1–8 March 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. I, 1947, p. 93.
District Court for the District of Columbia, Mahmoad Abdah, et al. v. George W. Bush, Lexis 4144, Judgment of 12 March 2005.
- Eastern States District Court, Eastern District of New York, Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin v. Dow Chemicals Co, Judgment of 28 March 2005, MDL No. 381, 04-CV-400.
- Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Vietnam Association for Victims of Agent Orange/Dioxin v. Dow Chemicals Co, 05-1953-cv, Judgment of 22 February 2008.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Mohammed Al-Adahi, et al v. Barack Obama, President of the United States, et al., 613 F. 3d 1102, Nos. 09-5333 and 09-5339, Judgment of 13 July 2010.
District Court for the District of Columbia, Abdulla Thani Faris Al Anazi et al. v. George Walker Bush et al., 370 F. Sup. 2d 188, Judgment of 21 April 2005.
- Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Ghaleb Nassar Al-Bihani v. Barack Obama, President of the United States, et al., 590 F. 3d 866, No. 09-5051, Judgment of 5 January 2010.
- Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Ghaleb Nassar Al-Bihani v. Barack Obama, President of the United States, et al., 619 F. 3d 1, No. 09-5051, Statement of 31 August 2010.
- Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Fadi Al Maqaleh, et al. v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, et al., 605 F. 3d 84, Nos. 09-5265, 09-5266 and 09-5267, Judgment of 21 May 2010.
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Ali Saleh Kahlah Al-Marri et al. v. Commander S.L. Wright, USN, Commander, Consolidated Naval Brig, 487 F.3d 160, Judgment of 11 June 2007.
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Ali Saleh Kahlah Al-Marri, et al. v. Commander John Pucciarelli, USN, Commander, Consolidated Naval Brig, et al., 534 F.3d 213, Judgment of 15 July 2008.
District Court for the District of Columbia, Isa Ali Abdulla Almurbati et al. v. George Walker Bush et al., 366 F. Sup. 2d 72, Judgment of 14 April 2005.
- District Court for the District of Columbia, Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad Al Odah et al. v. United States of America, et al., 346 F. Sup. 2d 1, Judgment of 20 October 2004.
- Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad Al Odah, et al. v. United States of America, et al., 559 F. 3d 539, Judgment of 6 March 2009.
- Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad Al Odah, et al. v. United States of America, et al., 611 F. 3d 8, Judgment of 30 June 2010.
District Court, Eastern District of New York, Maher Arar v. John Ashcroft et al., Judgment of 16 February 2006, Civil Action No. CV-04-0249 (DGT)(VVP), 414 F. Supp. 2d 250.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, In re Altstötter and Others (The Justice Trial), Judgment of 4 December 1947, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 14, 1947, p. 278.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Adham Mohammed Ali Awad v. Barack Obama, President of the United States, et al., 608 F. 3d 1, No. 09-5351, Judgment of 2 June 2010.
District Court for the Northern District of California, American Baptist Churches in the USA et al. v. Edwin Meese III as Attorney General of the United States and Alan Nelson as Commissioner of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, Judgment of 24 March 1989, published in Federal Supplement, Vol. 712, p. 756, Case No. C-85-3255 RFP.
- Notice of pendency of class action, proposed settlement of class action and settlement hearing, 4 June 2001.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Sufyian Barhoumi v. Barack Obama, President of the United States, et al., 608 F. 3d 416, No. 09-5383, Judgment of 11 June 2010.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Belkacem Bensayah v. Barack Obama, President of the United States, et al., 610 F. 3d 718, No. 08-5537, Judgment of 28 June 2010.
- Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Haji Bismullah et al. v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, No. 06-1197, and Huzaifa Parhat, et al. v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense et al., No. 06-1397, On Motions, Judgment of 20 July 2007.
- Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Haji Bismullah, et al. v. Robert M. Gates, Secretary of Defense, et al., 551 F.3d 1068, Nos. 06-1197, 07-1508 and 07-1523, Judgment of 9 January 2009.
- Supreme Court, Lakhdar Boumediene, et al. v. George W. Bush, President of the United States, et al., No. 06-1195 and Khaled A.F. Al Odah, et al. v. United States, et al., No. 06-1196, 553 US 723, 128 S.Ct. 2229, Judgment of 12 June 2008.
- District Court for the District of Columbia, Lakhdar Boumediene, et al. v. George W. Bush, President of the United States, et al., 579 F. Supp. 2d 191, No. 04-1166 (RJL), Memorandum Order of 20 November 2008.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, In re Brandt and Others (The Medical Trial), Judgment of 20 August 1947, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 14, 1947, p. 296.
United States v. William L. Calley, Judgment of 16 February 1973, Court-Martial Reports, Vol. 46, p. 1131.
United States v. William L. Calley, Judgment of 21 December 1973, published in United States Court of Military Appeals Reports, Vol. 22, p. 534.
District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, US v. Charles Emmanuel (a.k.a. Chuckie Taylor), Case No. 06-20758-CR-ALTONGA/Turnoff, Judgment of 5 July 2007.
District Court for the District of Columbia, Comfort Women case, Hwang Geum Joo, et al. v. Japan, Case No. (Civil Action) 00-02233 (HHK), Memorandum Opinion and Judgment, 4 October 2001.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Hwang Geum Joo, et al. v. Japan, Minister Yohei Kono, Minister of Foreign Affairs, No. 01-7169, 367 US App. D.C. 45, 413 F.3d 45, Judgment of 28 June 2005.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Ramiro Cornejo-Barreto v. W.H. Siefert, 379 F.3d 1075, Judgment of 16 August 2004.
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, John Demjanjuk v. Joseph Petrovsky, et al., 776 F.2d 571, No. 85-3435, Judgment of 31 October 1985.
- Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, United States of America v. John Demjanjuk, 367 F.3d 623, No. 02-3529, Judgment of 30 April 2004.
Court of Military Appeal, United States v. Dickinson, 30 September 1955, Court-Martial Reports, Vol. 20, p. 154.
Military Commission at Rome, Trial of General Anton Dostler, Commander of the 75th German Army Corps, Judgment of 8–12 October 1945, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. I, 1947, p. 22.
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Khaled El Masri v. George Tenet, et al., Case No. 1:05cv1417, Judgment of 12 May 2006.
Filartiga v. Peña-Irala, Judgment of 30 June 1980, published in Federal Reporter, 1980, Vol. 630, p. 876 and Digest of United States Practice in International Law, 1980, p. 252.
District Court for the District of Columbia, Jane Doe et al. v. Islamic Salvation Front (FIS) and Anwar Haddam, Judgment of 2 February 1998, published in Federal Supplement, Vol. 993, 1998, p. 3.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, In re Flick and Others (The Flick case), Judgment of 22 December 1947, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 14, 1947, p. 266.
Federal Court of Florida, Ford v. García, Judgment of 3 November 2000, excerpts published in American Journal of International Law, Vol. 95, 2001, p. 395.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, United States of America v. Anton Geiser, 527 F.3d 288, No. 06-4406, Judgment of 10 June 2008.
Court of Appeals (Fourth Circuit), Goldstar (Panama) SA v. United States, Judgment of 16 June 1992, published in International Law Reports, Vol. 96, 1994, p. 55.
Army Board of Review, United States v. Griffen, Judgment of 2 July 1968, published in Court-Martial Reports, Vol. 39, p. 586.
District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action Nos. 02-CV-0299 (CKK), 02-CV-0828 (CKK), 02-CV-1130 (CKK), 04-CV-1135 (ESH), 04-CV-1136 (JDB), 04-CV-1137 (RMC), 04-CV-1144 (RWR), 04-CV-1164 (RBW), 04-CV-1194 (HHK), 04-CV-1227 (RBW), 04-CV-1254 (HHK), 407 F. Sup. 2d 443, Judgment of 31 January 2005.
Intermediate Military Government Court at Dachau, Trial of Heinz Hagendorf, Judgment of 8–9 August 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XIII, 1949, p. 146.
- Supreme Court, Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Petitioner v. Donald H. Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defense, et al., Judgment of 29 June 2006, 548 US 557, 126 S. Ct. 2749.
- Guantanamo Military Commission, United States of America v. Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Ruling on Defence Motion for Article 5 Status Determination, 17 December 2007.
- Guantanamo Military Commission, United States of America v. Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Ruling on a Government Motion for Reconsideration, P-004, 14 March 2008.
- Guantanamo Military Commission, United States of America v. Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Ruling on a Defence Motion for an Order Implementing the Protection of the 1949 Geneva Convention IV, D-013, 24 March 2008.
- Guantanamo Military Commission, United States of America v. Salim Ahmed Hamdan, Ruling on a Defence Motion to Compel Production of the names and contact information of all Government Agents Involved in the investigation of this case, D-018, 21 April 2008.
Supreme Court, Hamdi v. Rumsfeld, 542 US 507, 124 S. Ct. 2633, Judgment of 28 June 2004.
District Court for the District of Columbia, Adel Hamlily, et al. v. Barack Obama, et al., 616 F. Supp. 2d 63, Judgment of 19 May 2009.
District Court for the District of Columbia, Hedi Hammamy v. Barack Obama, et al., No. 05-429 (RJL), Memorandum Order of 2 April 2009.
District Court, Central District, California, Leo Handel, et al. v. Andrija Artukovic, Judgment of 31 January 1985, Case No. 84-1411 PAR (Kx), published in International Law Reports, Vol. 79, 1989, p. 397.
US Army Court of Criminal Appeals, United States v. Sabrina D. Harman, Army 20050597, Judgment of 30 June 2008.
Office of Military Commissions, United States v. David Matthew Hicks, Record of Trial, 26 and 30 March 2007.
District Court for the Eastern District of New York, In re Holocaust Victim Assets Litigation, Judgment of 26 July 2000, published in Federal Supplement 105, 2000, p. 139.
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Yolanda M. Huet-Vaughn, No. 94-5005, 43 MJ 105, 1995 CAAF Lexis 118, Judgment of 28 September 1995.
District Court for the District of Columbia, Misc. No. 06-0145 (TFH), relating to: Civil Action Nos. 05-1377 (TFH), Ali v. Pappas; 05-1378 (TFH), Ali v. Rumsfeld; 05-1379 (TFH), Ali v. Karpinski; 05-1380, (TFH), Ali v. Sanchez; 479 F. Sup. 2d 85, Judgment of 27 March 2007.
Military Commission in Shanghai, Trial of Lieutenant General Harukei Isayama and Seven Others, Judgment of 25 July 1946, reprinted in International Law Studies: Documents on Prisoners of War, Naval War College, R.I., Naval War College Press, Vol. 60, 1979, pp. 345–348.
Military Commission in the Far East, Trial of Nisuke Masula and Four Others (The Jaluit Atoll Case), Kwajalein Atoll, Kwajalein Island, Marshall Island, Judgment of 7–13 December 1945, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. I, 1947, p. 71.
Court of Military Appeals, United States v. John G. Schultz, Judgment of 5 August 1952, Court-Martial Reports, Vol. 4, p. 104, Case No. 394.
District Court of Boston, Helen Todd v. Gen. Sintong Panjaitan, Civ. Act. No. 92-12255-PBS (D.Mass.1994)(1994 WL 827111), Judgment of 26 October 1994.
Kadić v. Karadžić and Jane Doe I and Jane Doe II v. Karadžić, Decision of 13 October 1995, Case Nos. 1541, 1544 – August term 1994, 70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995), published in International Legal Materials, Vol. 34, 1995, p. 1595.
Kadić v. Karadžić, 93 Civ. 1163 (PKL), 16 August 2000.
Jane Doe I, et al. v. Radovan Karadžić, 93 Civ. 878 (PKL), 4 October 2000.
- Office of Military Commissions, United States of America v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, Judgment of 4 June 2007.
- Court of Military Commission Review, United States of America v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, CMCR 07-001, Judgment of 24 September 2007.
- Guantánamo Military Commission, United States of America v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, D-013, Ruling on Defence Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction (Bill of Attainder), 20 February 2008.
- Guantánamo Military Commission, United States of America v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, D-008, Ruling on Defence Motion to Dismiss Charge One for Failure to State an Offense and for Lack of Subject Matter Jurisdiction, 21 April 2008.
- Guantánamo Military Commission, United States of America v. Omar Ahmed Khadr, D-022, Ruling on Defence Motion for Dismissal Due to Lack of Jurisdiction Under the Military Commission Act (2006) in Regard to Juvenile Crimes as a Child Soldier, 30 April 2008.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Sakwe Balintulo Khulumani, et al. v. Barclay National Bank Ltd., et al., 504 F.3d 254, Judgment of 12 October 2007.
Military Commission at Yokohama, Trial of Jutaro Kikuchi and Masaak Mahuchi, Judgment of 20 April 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XIII, 1949, p. 152.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Esther Kiobel, et al. v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., et al., 621 F. 3d 111, Nos. 06-4800-cv and 06-4876-cv, Judgment of 17 September 2010.
Military Commission in Wiesbaden, Trial of Alfons Klein and Six Others (The Hadamar Trial), 8–15 October 1945, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. I, 1947, p. 46.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Trial of Carl Krauch and Twenty-Two Others (The I.G. Farben Trial), Judgment of 14 August 1947–29 July 1948, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. X, 1949, p. 1.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Trial of Alfried Felix Alwyn Krupp von Bohlen und Halbach and Eleven Others (The Krupp Trial), Trial of 17 November 1947–30 June 1948, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. X, 1949, p. 69.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, United States of America v. Josias Kumpf, 438 F.3d 785, No. 05-2972, Judgment of 23 February 2006.
United States Army Board of Review, United States v. Howard B. Levy, Judgment of 29 August 1968, Court-Martial Reports, Vol. 39, p. 672, Case No. CM 416 463.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Trial of Wilhelm List and Others (The Hostages Trial), Trial of 8 July 1947–19 February 1948, published in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. VIII, 1949, p. 34.
Military Commission at Florence, Trial of Lieutenant General Kurt Maelzer, Trial of 9–14 September 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XI, 1949, p. 53.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Trial of Erhard Milch, Trial of 20 December 1946–17 April 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. VII, 1948, p. 27.
- Carmen Mochizuki, et al. v. The United States, Case No. 97-294C, United States Court of Federal Claims, Settlement Agreement, Opinion and Order, 25 January 1999, published in Federal Claims Reporter, Vol. 43, 1999, p. 97.
- Order Granting Preliminary Approval of the Settlement Agreement, 11 June 1998, published in Federal Claims Reporter, Vol. 41, 1998, p. 54.
Court of Claims, Morrison v. The United States of America, Judgment of 20 February 1974, Federal Reporter, Vol. 492, p. 1219.
Supreme Court, Mohammad Munaf, et al. v. Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, et al., No. 06-1666, and Pete Geren, Secretary of the Army, et al. v. Shawqi Omar, et al., No. 07-394, Judgment of 12 June 2008.
District Court for the Southern District of New York, Mushikiwabo, et al. v. Barayagwiza, Judgment of 8 April 1996, Slip opinion, District Court for the Southern District of New York, Civil Docket, Vol. 94, p. 3627.
Order Dismissing Defendant’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Order Lifting Stay of Extradition of 7 September 2007.
- Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, Manuel Antonio Noriega v. George Pastrana, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Miami, et al., 564 F.3d 1290, Judgment of 8 April 2009.
- Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, Jose Padilla, et al. v. Donald Rumsfeld, 352 F.3d 695, Judgment of 18 December 2003.
US Supreme Court, Secretary of Defense v. Jose Padilla and Donna R. Newman, 542 US 426, 124 S. Ct. 2711, Judgment of 28 June 2004.
- Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, Jose Padilla v. C.T. Hanft, USN Commander, Consolidated Naval Brig, 423 F.3d 386, Judgment of 9 September 2005.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, United States v. Oswald Pohl and Others, Judgment of 3 November 1947, reprinted in Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals under Control Council Law No. 10, Vol. V, 1997, p. 958.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, The Presbyterian Church of Sudan v. Talisman Energy, 07-0016-cv, Judgment of 2 October 2009.
Princz v. Federal Republic of Germany, Judgment of 23 December 1992, published in Federal Supplement, Vol. 813, 1992, p. 22.
- Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Princz v. Federal Republic of Germany, Judgment of 1 July 1994, published in Federal Reporter, Vol. 26, 1994, p. 1166.
District Court for the District of Columbia, Abu Bakker Qassim, et al. v. George W. Bush, 407 F. Sup. 2d 198, Judgment of 22 December 2005.
Supreme Court, Ex Parte Quirin and Others, Judgment of 31 July 1942, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 10, 1941-42, p. 564.
Supreme Court, Shafiq Rasul, et al., Petitioners v. George W. Bush, President of the United States, et al.; Fawzi Khalid Abdullah Fahad al Odah, et al., Petitioners v. United States, et al., Judgment of 28 June 2004, 542 US 466, 124 S. Ct. 2686.
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Mohammedou Ould Salahi, et al. v. Barack Obama, President of the United States, et al., 625 F. 3d 745, No. 10-5087, Judgment of 5 November 2010.
Military Commission at Shanghai, Trial of Lieutenant-General Shigeru Sawada and Three Others, Trial of 27 February–15 April 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. V, 1948, p. 1.
General Military Government Court at Dachau, Trial of Max Schmid, Judgment of 19 May 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XIII, 1949, p. 151.
Court of Military Appeals, United States v. Frank C. Schultz, Judgment of 7 March 1969, Court-Martial Reports, Vol. 39, p. 133.
General Military Court of the US Zone of Germany, Trial of Otto Skorzeny and Others, Trial of 18 August–9 September 1947, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. IX, 1949, p. 90.
Military Commission at Augsberg, Trial of Gunther Thiele and Georg Steinert, Judgment of 13 June 1945, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. III, 1948, p. 56.
trial transcript contained in Australian War Memorial, file series AWM 83, 255 to 273.
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, United States v. Matthew K. Travis, Sergeant, US Marine Corps, No. 07-482, 66 M.J. 301, 2008 CAAF Lexis 615, Judgment of 15 May 2008.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, Trial of Wilhelm von Leeb and Thirteen Others (The German High Command Trial), Trial of 30 December 1947–28 October 1948, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XII, 1949, p. 1.
Supreme Court, Ward v. State of Texas, Judgment of 1 June 1942, Supreme Court Cases & Opinions, Vol. 316, 1942, p. 547.
Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, In re Weizsaecker and Others (The Ministries Trial), Judgment of 14 April 1949, summarized in Annual Digest and Reports of Public International Law Cases, Vol. 16, 1949, p. 344.
Supreme Court, In re Tomoyuki Yamashita, Judgment of 4 February 1946, published in American Journal of International Law, Vol. 40, 1946, p. 432.
Military Commission at the Mariana Islands, Trial of Tachibana Yochio and Thirteen Others, Trial of 2–15 August 1946, summarized in Law Reports of Trials of War Criminals, Vol. XIII, 1949, p. 152.
Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, United States of America, v. Ramzi Ahmed Yousef, et al., 327 F.3d 56, Judgment of 4 April 2003.
Tribunal Supremo de Justicia, Sala de Casación Penal (Supreme Tribunal of Justice, Chamber of Criminal Appeals), Case No. 869, Judgment of 10 December 2001. Errata published in Order No. 870 of 12 December 2001 of the Tribunal Supremo de Justicia, Sala de Casación Penal.
Tribunal Supremo de Justicia, Sala Constitucional (Supreme Tribunal of Justice, Constitutional Chamber), Case of Isaac Pérez Recao, Judgment of 27 July 2004.
Communal Court of Mitrovica, The Public Prosecutor v. Lulzim Ademi, Case No. P/29/99, Judgment of 30 August 2000.
The Public Prosecutor v. Momcilo Trajković, Case No. P 68/2000, Judgment of 6 March 2001.
The Public Prosecutor v. Momcilo Trajković, Case No. AP. 145/2001, Decision Act of 30 November 2001.
The Public Prosecutor v. Momcilo Trajković, Case No. PP 68/2000, K. 31/99, Opinion on Appeals of Convictions of 30 November 2001.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 170
 § 170
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 Application No. 44
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 UKHL 
 v. 
 UKHL 
 v. 
 EWCA 
 v. 
 v. 
 UKHL 
 v. 
 EWCA 
 v. 
 EWCA 
 v. 
 EWCA 
 v. 
 UKHL 
 v. 
 EWCA 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 UKHL 
 v. 
 UKSC 
 v. 
 EWCA 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 EWCA 
 v. 
 v. 
 EWCA 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.