Source: https://npo.tspu.edu.ru/en/archive.html?year=2019&issue=1&article_id=7211
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 10:20:48+00:00

Document:
An important task of the higher professional education system is the formation of students thinking focused on the future professional activities. For the last ten years in the pedagogical discourse computational thinking began to be regarded as a special organization of cognitive processes that allows to analyze and resolve problems with an orientation to formulate them in such a way that solutions can be represented as a sequence of steps or algorithms that will be implemented with the help of computers. Computational thinking pretends to the status of a new cognitive skill of the information society of the 21st century. For the university ITstudents a well-developed computational thinking is the key to a future successful career. The potential possibilities and organization of the practice of solving physics learning tasks are considered in the context of formation computational thinking of the university IT-students. The analysis is carried out for organization the process of solving physics learning tasks, focused on the development of such components of computational thinking as abstraction, decomposition, algorithmization and generalization. Abstraction is an important component of physics and is associated with the process of solving problems. Students deal with idealized conceptual models of real objects and processes in solving problems. In solving physical problems, decomposition is associated with a speculative breakdown of the material systems under consideration into components, and the analyzed processes into stages. Generalization is used in the transition from individual learning tasks of various contents to their identification. It is an important stage for understanding the general meaning in different initial content. Algorithmization is present in solving physical problems as a sequence of actions. The same algorithm can be used by students for a selected class of learning tasks.
1. Wing J. Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 2006, vol. 49 (3), pp. 33–35. DOI: 10.1145/1118178.1118215.
2. Haseski H. İ., İlic U., Tuğtekin U. Defi ning a New 21st Century Skill-Computational Thinking: Concepts and Trends. International Education Studies, 2018, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 29–42. DOI:10.5539/ies.v11n4p29.
3. Denning P. J. Remaining Trouble Spots with Computational Thinking. Communications of the ACM, 2017, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 33–39. DOI: 10.1145/2998438.
4. Aho A. V. Computation and Computational Thinking. The Computer Journal, 2012, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 832–835. DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/bxs074.
5. Wong K.-С. Integrating Computational Thinking into Discrete Mathematics. Conference Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education 2017. Hong Kong: The Education University of Hong Kong. Pp. 127–131.
6. Khenner E. K. Vychislitel’noye myshleniye [Computational thinking]. Obrazovaniye i nauka – The Education and Science Journal, 2016, no. 2 (131), pp. 18–33 (in Russian). DOI: 10.17853/1994-5639-2016-2-18-33.
7. Aho A. V. Computation and Computational Thinking. The Computer Journal, 2012, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 832–835. DOI:10.1093/comjnl/bxs074.
8. Klunnikova M. M., Pushkareva T. P. O podkhodakh k opredeleniyu ponyatiya “vychislitel’noye myshleniye” [On approaches to the defi nition of the concept “computational thinking”]. Innovatsii v obrazovatel’nom prostranstve: opyt, problemy, perspektivy: sb. nauch. st. [Innovations in the educational space: experience, problems, prospects: collection of scientifi c articles]. Krasnoyarsk, Siberian Federal University Publ., 2016. Pp. 35–39 (in Russian).
9. Klunnikova M. M., Pushkareva T. P. Metody i sredstva razvitiya vychislitel’nogo myshleniya pri obuchenii distsipline “Chislennyye metody” [Methods and tools for the development of computational thinking in teaching the discipline “Numerical methods”]. Sovremennoye obrazovaniye – Modern Education, 2017, no. 2, pp. 95–101. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8736.2017.2.23067 (in Russian). URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pp/article_23067.html.
10. Gladun A. D. Fizika kak kul’tura modelirovaniya [Physics as a culture of modeling]. Fizicheskoye obrazovaniye v vuzakh, 1996, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 41–45 (in Russian).
11. Larchenkova L. A. Obrazovatel’nyy potentsial uchebnykh fi zicheskikh zadach [The educational potential of the physics learning tasks]. Fizika v sisteme sovremennogo obrazovaniya (FSSO – 15): materialy XIII Mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii, Sankt-Peterburg, 1–4 iyunya 2015 g. T. 2 [Physics in the system of modern education (FSSO – 15): materials of the XIII International Conference, St. Petersburg, June 1–4, 2015. Vol. 2]. St. Petersburg, Fora-print Publ., 2015. Pp. 114–117 (in Russian).
12. Gilev A. A. Praktikum po resheniyu fi zicheskikh zadach v tekhnicheskom vuze: uchebnoye posobiye [Practicum on solving physical problems in a technical college: textbook]. St. Petersburg, Lan’ Publ., 2008. 144 p. (in Russian).
13. Politsinskiy E. V., Rumbeshta E. A. Realizatsiya deyatel’nostnogo podkhoda v protsesse obucheniya shkol’nikov resheniyu fi zicheskikh zadach [Realization of the activity approach in the process of teaching schoolchildren to solve physical problems]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2006, vol. 6 (57), pp. 58–162 (in Russian).
14. Zelichenko V. M., Larionov V. V. O problemno oriyentirovannom podkhode k resheniyu zadach po fi zike v profi l’noy shkole i vuze [Problem-oriented approach to solving tasks in physics at special schools and university]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2009, vol. 5 (83), pp. 10–15 (in Russian).
15. Zelichenko V. M., Larionov V. V., Pak V. V. Proyektnyy potentsial uchebnykh zadach po fi zike i ego diagnostika na primere zadach iz razdela “Elektrostatika” [Project potential of learning tasks in physics and its diagnostics on the example of tasks from the section “Electrostatics”]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2017, vol. 4(181), pp. 64–70 (in Russian). DOI: 10.23951/1609-624X-2017-4-64-70.
16. Baranov A.V. Proyektnaya deyatel’nost’ komp’yuternogo modelirovaniya v fi zicheskom praktikume tekhnicheskogo universiteta: organizatsiya, trebovaniya, kriterii otsenki [The project activity of computer modeling in the physics practicum of the technical university: organization, requirements, evaluation criteria]. Innovatsii v obrazovanii – Innovation in Education, 2016, no. 10, pp. 158–170 (in Russian).
17. Baranov A. V. Obucheniyye komp’yuternomu modelirovaniyu mekhanicheskogo dvizheniya v Mathcad na sisteme “skvoznykh” zadach. Chast’ 1 [Teaching computer modeling of mechanical motion in Mathcad on a system of “end-to-end” tasks. Part 1]. Distantsionnoye i virtual’noye obucheniye, 2014, no. 11 (89), pp. 98–109 (in Russian).

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.