Source: http://www.pattersonlawfirm.com/success-stories/notable-appeals.aspx
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 20:12:23+00:00

Document:
Moses' father-in-law first suggested a hierarchy of courts (see Exodus 18:13-26), and cases today are not always won or lost at the trial level. Here are some notable decisions on appeals.
Harmon v. Gordon, 712 F.3d 1044 (7th Cir. 2013): The 7th Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the dismissal of Mr. Harmon’s claims of breach of contract, tortious interference, abuse of process, and malicious prosecution against NBA player Mr. Gordon.
Yessenow v. Executive Risk Indem., Inc., 953 N.E.2d 433 (1st Dist. 2011): D & O insurance policy’s exclusion that bars coverage for claims brought by a bankruptcy trustee is unenforceable under the plain language of 11 U.S.C. 541(c) and policy’s “insured v. insured” exclusion does not bar coverage because the trustee is agent of the court.
Heinrich v. Peabody, 117 Ill.2d 162, 510 N.E.2d 889 (1987): Patterson argued twice in the Illinois Supreme Court—is the definitive case on the pleading requirements for deciding who is responsible for the actions of an employee loaned by one company to another (loaned servant doctrine).
Interfaith Medical Center v. Sabiston, 527 N.Y.S.2d 48, 136 A.D.2d 238 (NY AD 1988): One of the leading cases in the nation on a private association's right to enforce its own rules.
McKenzie v. Romeiser, 205 Ill.App.3d 830, 563 N.E.2d 837 (1990): In a case briefed and argued by Patterson, Justice Jiganti stated: "Both counsel on appeal were especially good lawyers."
Chemical Bank v. Paul, 244 Ill.App.3d 772, 614 N.E.2d 436 (1st Dist. 1993): One of the leading cases on the obligation of good faith in commercial dealings.
Hinc v. Lime-O-Sol Co., 382 F.3d 716 (7th Cir. 2004): Obligation of 'good faith' is not too vague to enforce.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.