Source: https://vestnik.tspu.edu.ru/en/archive.html?year=2018&issue=5&article_id=6938
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 18:34:42+00:00

Document:
Based on the letters and memoirs of N. V. Shelgunov, V. O. Kovalevsky, N. G. Chernyshevsky and modern critical works, the phenomenon of emergence of marriage of convenience in Russia is considered. Untypical family models with a new attitude towards women are being investigated. The gender approach reveals a gradual change in the public consciousness of the role of women in the family and society. The article analyzes historical preconditions for the emergence of such a cultural phenomenon as marriage of convenience. The real implementation of the theory of “reasonable egoism”, proclaimed by N. G. Chernyshevsky in the novel “What Is to Be Done?”, is being studied. On the examples of family life of M. A. Obrucheva – P. I. Bokov, L. P. Mikhaelis – N. V. Shelgunov, S. V. Kovalevskaya – V. O. Kovalevsky and others, the fate of the participants of the love experiment can be traced. In the opinion of N. G. Chernyshevsky and his followers, a woman in marriage should not only obtain equal with a man rights, but also freedom. She can control her feelings. At the same time, men are liberators, by means of marriage helping a woman to avoid domestic despotism or giving an opportunity to get an education. In Russia the model of behavior of a noble man was conditioned by his desire to take responsibility for a woman, deprived of the civil rights by the society. N. G. Chernyshevsky showed what a decent person in Russia should do, without going beyond the framework of “reasonable egoism”. That is, in the conditions of social injustice, a man had to make up and give a woman what she did not receive from the society. The model of the noble altruistic behavior of a man firmly entered the consciousness and was developed by the part of the youth who shared the ideas of radicalism.
1. Kafanova O. B. Zhorzh Sand i russkaya literatura XIX veka (Mify i real’nost’). 1830–1860 gg. [George Sand and Russian literature of the XIX century (Myths and Reality). 1830–1860]. Tomsk, TSPU Publ., 1998. 410 p. (in Russian).
2. Shtraykh S. Ya. Kommentarii k “Pis’mam” [Comments on the “Letters”]. Kovalevskaya S. V. Vospominaniya i pis’ma [Kovalevskaya S. V. Memories and letters]. Moscow, 1951. 206 p. (in Russian).
3. Shelgunova L. P. Iz dalekogo proshlogo [From the distant past]. Shelgunov N. V., Shelgunova L. P., Mikhaylov M. L. Vospominaniya. V 2 tomakh. T. 2 [Shelgunov N. V., Shelgunova L. P., Mikhaylov M. L. Memories. In 2 vol. Vol. 2]. Moscow, 1967. 633 p. (in Russian).
4. Pavlyuchenko. Zhenshichiny v russkom osvoboditel’nom dvizhenii. Ot Marii Volkonskoy do Very Figner [Women in the Russian liberation movement. From Maria Volkonskaya to Vera Figner]. Moscow, 1988. 270 p. (in Russian).
5. Kafanova О. B. Elena Gan i dve eye docheri v istorii kul’tury [Elena Gan and her two daughters in the history of culture]. Russkaya literatura v kontekste kul’tury. Materialy vserossiyskoy konferentsii. 2–3 noyabrya 2006 g. Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo instituta [Russian literature in the context of culture. Materials of the All-Russian Conference. November 2–3, 2006, Tomsk Pedagogical Institute]. Tomsk, 2007. Pp. 77–85 (in Russian).
6. Voronin A. Zhenskiy vopros [The women’s question]. Mayak. 03.07.2017 (in Russian). URL: http://mayak-pushkino.ru/zhenskijj-vopros/ (accessed 13 March 2017).
7. Reznik S. Vladimir Kovalevskiy (Tragediya Nigilista) [Vladimir Kovalevsky (Tragedy of the Nihilist)]. Moscow, 1978. 335 p. (in Russian).
8. Shtraykh S. Ya. Sestry Korvin-Krukovskiye [Sisters Korvin-Krukovskie]. Moscow, 1933. 342 p. (in Russian).
9. Lermontova Yu. V. Vospominaniya o Sof’ye Kovalevskoy [Memories about Sofya Kovalevskaya]. Kovalevskaya S. V. Vospominaniya i pis’ma [Kovalevskaya S. V. Memories and letters]. Moscow, 1951. 206 p. (in Russian).

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.