Source: https://flagstaff-lawyer.com/2012/03/
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 13:28:16+00:00

Document:
We are pleased to announce the formation of the Griffen & Stevens Law Firm, PLLC in Flagstaff, Arizona. Arizona criminal defense attorney Bruce S. Griffen has joined Flagstaff lawyer Ryan J. Stevens in forming the Griffen & Stevens Law Firm, PLLC.
Bruce Griffen’s legal assistant is Lisa Cureton. Based in Flagstaff, and proudly serving criminal defendants in all of northern Arizona, Bruce Griffen brings experience, dedication, and a competitive edge. Mr. Griffen has an extensive background in criminal defense litigation and jury trials.
Together, Arizona attorneys Bruce Griffen and Ryan Stevens look forward to providing exceptional legal services to those in need.
Have you heard of lifetime probation? For example, in some cases involving sexual offenses under Title 13, Chapter 14 of the Arizona Revised Statutes, a person can be placed on lifetime supervised felony probation. That usually means that a person is going to be on supervised probation until the day they die. Usually. But not always.
In this article, we’re going to delve into the post-Sentencing world of probation termination. After a person is convicted of a felony and sentenced to a term of probation (or prison with a probation tail), the Adult Probation Department takes over the case, supervises the convicted person, and reports failures to the Court.
But what if a person does not deserve to remain on probation? Can the Court step in and terminate lifetime probation? Yes.
It is well-settled that the court which places a defendant on probation retains jurisdiction over the probationer for as long as he remains on probation.
The trial court that issued the probationary term ‘retains jurisdiction over the probationary terms and the probationer until the term of probation is successfully completed or until it is revoked.
State v. Dean, 226 Ariz. 47, 243 P.3d 1029 (Ariz. App., 2010) (citing State v. Contreras, 180 Ariz. 450, 453, 885 P.2d 138, 141 (App. 1994); accord State v. Ray, 209 Ariz. 429, 431, ¶¶ 4-5, 104 P.3d 160, 162 (App. 2004).
The court, on its own initiative or on application of the probationer, after notice and an opportunity to be heard for the prosecuting attorney and, on request, the victim, may terminate the period of probation or intensive probation and discharge the defendant at a time earlier than that originally imposed if in the court’s opinion the ends of justice will be served and if the conduct of the defendant on probation warrants it.
A.R.S. § 13-901(E). “Section 13-901(E) vests trial courts with broad discretion to terminate probation.” State v. Lewis, 244 P.3d 561, 563 (2011). In Lewis, the Arizona Supreme Court went on to hold, “If the superior court finds that . . . [the defendant has] rehabilitated himself and no good purpose will be served by further probation, § 13-901(E) provides the judge with the discretion to terminate the probation.” Id.
In Lewis, the superior court had granted early termination of the defendant’s probation even though the defendant did not successfully complete all terms of his probation. In fact, the State appealed the trial court’s termination of Lewis’ probation on the basis that the defendant was “unsuccessful” on probation, citing the following failures: the defendant “had neither completed all required community service nor paid all fines within the five-year probation period.” Id.
The court of appeals . . . correctly held that a trial court may terminate probation under § 13-901(E) when the defendant has not completed all terms of probation. To be sure, such a failure will typically indicate that the defendant is not sufficiently rehabilitated to deserve termination, or, in the words of the statute, that neither “the ends of justice” nor “the conduct of the defendant on probation” justify early termination. But, in an appropriate case, the statute authorizes the trial court to terminate probation even if a probationer has been unsuccessful in fulfilling all conditions of probation within the original term.
Id.at 564. The Arizona Supreme Court, finding no abuse of discretion by the trial court, expressly held “that § 13-901(E) permits a court to terminate the probation of a defendant who has not completed all required community service or paid all outstanding fines and fees if the statutory prerequisites are met.” Id.
a. Discretionary Probation Termination. At any time during the term of probation, upon motion of the probation officer or on its own initiative, the court, after notifying the prosecutor, may terminate probation and discharge the probationer absolutely as provided by law.
The basis of all of the Arizona laws supporting the power of a Court to terminate probation is that the trial judge is the one who knows best. Section 13-901(E) “expressly allows termination decisions to be based on the ‘opinion’ of the trial court, entrusts broad discretion to the judges most able to determine the situation of a particular defendant in deciding whether sufficient rehabilitation has occurred to warrant termination.” Lewis, 244 P.3d at 564.
The morale of the story is that “lifetime” does not always mean lifetime when it involves felony probation in Arizona. Circumstances often warrant new relief. It is worth consulting with an experienced Arizona criminal defense lawyer to talk about felony probation. Having your probation terminated early can save you thousands of dollars and a lifetime of difficulties not designed for people like you.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 13
 v. 
 § 13
 § 13
 § 13