Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/217117871/Sampo-IP-v-TIBCO-Software
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 16:03:43+00:00

Document:
Canatelo v. AXIS Communications AB Et. Al.
CYVA Research Holdings v. Henderson Citizens Bancshares Et. Al.
SAMPO IP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. TIBCO SOFTWARE INC., Defendant.
Delaware corporation with a principal place of business at 3303 Hillview Avenue, Palo Alto, California 94304. Tibco has appointed The Corporation Trust Company, Corporation Trust Center, 1209 Orange Street, Wilmington, Delaware 19801 as its agent for service of process.
United States, Title 35 of the United States Code. 4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Communication and Collaboration Method, which the United States Patent & Trademark Office duly issued on August 3, 2004. A true and correct copy of the 229 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
information, including without limitation, e-mails, messaging, links, through its notification system. For example and without limitation, Defendants system pushes notices to group participants, (i) allowing a first group participant to access the first information, e.g., message/post, while suppressing access to the first information to a second group participant, and (ii) allowing the second group participant to access the second information, e.g., message/post, while suppressing access to the second information to the first group participant.3 COUNT I: INFRINGEMENT OF THE 149 PATENT 17. full. 18.
See, e.g., http://www.tibbr.com/what-is-tibbr/overview/microblogging.php; http://www.tibbr.com/what-istibbr/overview/notifications.php. 3 See id.
suffered and will continue to suffer damages. Sampo is entitled to recover from Tibco the damages adequate to compensate for such infringement, which have yet to be determined. 28. this Court.
See, for example, http://www.tibbr.com/what-is-tibbr/overview/microblogging.php; http://www.tibbr.com/what-istibbr/overview/notifications.php; http://info.tibbr.com/rs/tibcotibbr/images/tibbr_integration.pdf.
Network Protection Sciences v. Juniper Networks et. al.
Reald v. Volfoni et. al.
Warren Scott Distributors v. Sears Roebuck and Company et. al.
Vehicle Service Group, LLC et. al.
Bonutti Skeletal Innovations v. Biomet et. al.
Nite Glow Industries et. al. v. Central Garden & Pet Company et. al.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.