Source: http://www.xenu-directory.net/mirrors/www.whyaretheydead.net/lisa_mcpherson/legal/bmpwpc030206.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 18:18:01+00:00

Document:
Bob Minton v. Estate of Lisa McPherson, Scientology's Flag et. al.
motion to disqualify her and refusing to rule on the legal sufficiency thereof.
in accordance with Fla.R.App.P. 9.220.
38.02. Judge Schaeffer completely ignored this as well.
before the court, certiorari has been held to be the proper remedy. See Rucks v.
Florida, 692 So. 2d 976, 977-8 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).
Church to add Minton as an additional party defendant to its counterclaim.
So. 2d 281, 282 (Fla. 2dDCA 1998).
was added as a party) abated pending the trial of the wrongful death claim.
ultimately was not consummated. The litigation continued.
Defendants' Omnibus Motion For Terminating Sanctions and Other Relief. (A-\7).
party to the motion (though a party to the action).
-that the order was in retaliation for the settlement falling through.
well-founded belief of bias and prejudice of Judge Schaeffer against him.
matters not before the court.
the State Attorney did not go forward with perjury charges against Minton.
accused Dandar, a member of the Florida Bar, of perjury and suborning perjury.
lawyers and members of The Florida Bar.
or proceedings." It also says, "Disclosure of this information is mandatory.
2001, and one on October 11 and 12, 2001.
further proceedings in which he was a party.
taxes "on the millions (perhaps as much as a billion) of dollars" (A-7, p. 20).
she "would have asked Minton about it to see if he claimed the Fifth Amendment."
would invoke his Constitutionally guaranteed right against self-4ncrimination.
in the case but was taking sides against him.
immunity attaches to the statutory cause of action provided for in Fla. Stat.
disqualification pursuant to Florida Statutes § 38.02 and Fla.R.Jud.Admin.
date, Judge Schaeffer was provided with a copy of the motion (A-l, pp. 1-2).
("Minton") would request leave of court.. .." (A-1, p. 2).
procedural bar to her own disqualification.
trial in January of 2003.
disqualify and that absent permission the motion was a nullity.
Schaeffer prohibiting her further judicial involvement in this case.
$5,701.66 for a share of the court-appointed mediator's fee. (A-6).
disqualify and remanding with directions to grant the motion.
h~otion~ in order to construct a procedural bar to her own disqualification.
judicial proceedings and officers demands much more.
to whether the motion is legally sufficient as a matter of law." Peterson v.
v. Winn Dixie Stores/Sedgwick James, 810 So. 2d 979, 981 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).
prudent person a well-founded fear of not receiving a fair and impartial trial.
946 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998).
are sufficient grounds for disqualification.
the party. Deauville Realty Co. v. Tobin, 120 So. 2d 198 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1960).
petition for writ of prohibition. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation v.
Parsons, 644 So. 2d 340 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994).
indicating that Minton was a liar and that she did not believe Minton.
case is also a sufficient basis for disqualification. In State ex rel. Morgan v.
the judge agreed to delay sentencing until the disposition of the third case.
rather than the judge's perception of his ability to act fairly and impartially.
which had been agreed to by the wife*s counsel and held petitioner in contempt.
Id. at 342. The same holds true here.
insufficient. Fla.R.Jud.Admin. 2.160(f). The rule is quite clear in this regard.
intolerable adversary atmosphere' between the trial judge and the litigant." Id.
trial court judgment that flows from that error.
request a hearing on his motion to disqualify rendered the motion unavailing.
The Court noted that there was no requirement that the movant request a hearing.
motion to dismiss." Id. at 1066.
disqualify. This in itself warrants disqualification.
officer to serve as the gatekeeper of motions seeking to disqualify her.
Court has orally set for trial in January of 2003.
with abated claims against them.
is utilized to seek redress, but it will not foreclose the provision of relief.
motion could not legally have been a nullity. Also, see, Lages v. State, 685 So.
was required to seek the court's permission to file a motion to disqualify.
from ruling on his motion seeking permission to file the motion to disqualify?
disqualify) and did not rule on it within the 10-day window of Fla.R.Jud.Admin.
5  Judge Schaeffer has literally created a perpetual motion machine.
from the very judge he was seeking to disqualify.
Schaeffer disqualified from further proceedings in this cause.
attached service list this 6th day of February, 2003.
ESTATE OF LISA MCPHERSON vs. CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY, etc., et al.
On 24 January 2003, Judge Schaeffer denied Minton's motion. Not yet made public.

References: v. 
 v.

 § 38
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v.