Source: https://www.politstudies.ru/article/3829
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 08:44:07+00:00

Document:
Почему одни страны становятся демократиями, а в других на смену одним недемократическим режимам приходят другие? Рассматривая политические трансформации в постсоветских странах как «естественный эксперимент» режимных изменений, автор предлагает оригинальный подход к анализу изменений режимов на постсоветском пространстве. Согласно его гипотезе, различие вариантов таких изменений обусловлено сценариями межэлитных конфликтов, которые (сценарии), в свою очередь, зависят от структуры («наследие прошлого» и распределение ресурсов) и агентов (элиты, их представления и стратегии), причем сценарии межэлитных конфликтов в процессе смены режимов не всегда ведут к определенному «пункту назначения»: один сценарий может трансформироваться в другой, в т.ч. и под воздействием экзогенных факторов, задающих структуру политических возможностей. В качестве первого шага к проверке этой гипотезы автор анализирует политические трансформации в трех постсоветских странах – в России, на Украине и в Беларуси.
Волков В. 2005. Дело “Стандарт Ойл” и дело “ЮКОСа”. – Pro et Contra, т. 9, № 2.
Квасьневский А. 2004. Интервью. –www.igrunov.ru/topic/ukr_elections/1103809716.html.
Сурков В. 2006. Суверенитет – это политический синоним конкурентоспособности. –http://www.edinros.ru/print.html?id=111148.
Baker P., Glasser S. 2005. Kremlin Rising: Vladimir Putin’s Russia and the End of Revolution. N.Y.
Bunce V. 2000. Comparative Democratization: Big and Bounded Generalizations. – Comparative Political Studies, vol. 33, № 6/7.
Carothers T. 2002. The End of the Transition Paradigm. – Journal of Democracy, vol. 13, № 1.
Christensen R.K., Rakhimkulov E.R., Wise Ch.C. 2005. The Ukrainian Orange Revolution Brought More Than a New President: What Kind of Democracy Will the Institutional Changes Bring? – Communist and Post-Communist Studies, vol. 38, № 2.
Collier D., Levitsky S. 1997. Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual Innovation in Comparative Research. – World Politics, vol. 49, № 3.
Collins K. 2004. The Logic of Clan Politics: Evidence from the Central Asian Trajectories. – World Politics, vol. 56, № 2.
Colomer J.M. 2000. Strategic Transitions: Game Theory and Democratization. Baltimore.
Colton T.J., McFaul M. 2003. Popular Choice and Managed Democracy: The Russian Election of 1999 and 2000. Washington.
Diamond L. 2002 Thinking about Hybrid Regimes. – Journal of Democracy, vol. 13, № 2.
Dowding K., John P., Mergopius T., Vugt M. van. 2000. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Analytic and Empirical Developments. – European Journal of Political Research, vol. 37, № 4.
Eke S.M., Kuzio T. 2000. Sultanism in Eastern Europe: The Socio-Political Roots of Authoritarian Populism in Belarus. – Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 52, № 3.
Fish M.S. 2005. Democracy Derailed in Russia: The Failure of Open Politics. Cambridge.
Frye T. 1997. A Politics of Institutional Choice: Post-Communist Presidencies. – Comparative Political Studies, vol. 30, № 5.
Gel’man V. 2004. The Unrule of Law in the Making: The Politics of Informal Institution Building in Russia. – Europe-Asia Studies, vol. 56, № 7.
Gel’man V. 2005. Political Opposition in Russia: A Dying Species? – Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 21, № 3.
Gel’man V. 2006. From “Feckless Pluralism” to “Dominant Power Politics”: The Transformation of Russia’s Party System. – Democratization, vol. 13, № 4.
Gel’man V., Ryzhenkov S., Brie M. 2003. Making and Breaking Democratic Transitions: The Comparative Politics of Russia’s Regions, Lanham.
Gorenburg D.P. 2003. Minority Ethnic Mobilization in the Russian Federation. Cambridge.
Eurasia. –World Politics, vol. 58, № 1.
Hale H.E. 2006. Why Not Parties in Russia: Democracy, Federalism, and the State. Cambridge.
Higley J., Bayulgen O., George J. 2003. Political Elite Integration and Differentiation in Russia. – Steen A., Gel’man V. (eds.) Elites and Democratic Development in Russia. L.
Higley J., Gunther R. (eds.) 1992. Elites and Democratic Consolidation in Latin America and Southern Europe. Cambridge.
Hirschman A.O. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Response to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge (MA).
Hoffman D. 2002. The Oligarchs: Wealth and Power in the New Russia. N.Y.
Huskey E. 1999. Presidential Power in Russia. Armonk, N.Y.
Kitschelt H. 1986. Political Opportunity Structure and Political Protest: Anti-Nuclear Movements in Four Democracies. – British Journal of Political Science, vol. 16, № 1.
Kitschelt H. 1999. Accounting for Outcomes of Post-Communist Regime Change: Causal Depth or Shallowness in Rival Explanations. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.
Korosteleva E.A. 2005. The Emergence of a Party System. – White S. et al. (eds.) Post-Communist Belarus. Lanham.
Levitsky S., Way L.A. 2002. The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism. – Journal of Democracy, vol. 13, № 2.
Lieven A. 1999. Ukraine and Russia: A Fraternal Rivalry. Washington.
Linz J.J. 1973. The Future of the Authoritarian Situation or Institutionalization of the Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Brazil. – Stepan A. (ed.) Authoritarian Brazil. Origins, Policies, and Future. New Haven.
Linz J.J. 1990. The Perils of Presidentialism. – Journal of Democracy, vol. 1, № 1.
Mahoney J., Snyder R. 1999. Rethinking Agency and Structure in the Study of Regime Change. – Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 34, № 3.
Marples D.R. 1999. Belarus: A Denationalized Nation. Amsterdam.
McFaul M. 2002. The Fourth Wave of Democracy and Dictatorship: Non-Cooperative Transitions in the Post-Communist World. – World Politics, vol. 54, № 2.
McFaul M., Petrov N. 2004. What the Elections Tell Us. – Journal of Democracy, vol. 15, № 3.
Motyl A.J. 1993. Dilemmas of Independence: Ukraine after Totalitarianism. N.Y.
O’Donnell G., Schmitter Ph. 1986. Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Tentative Conclusions about Uncertain Democracies. Baltimore.
Przeworski A. 1991. Democracy and the Market: Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge.
Remington T.F. 2006. Presidential Support in the Russian State Duma. – Legislative Studies Quarterly, vol. 31, № 1.
Roeder Ph.G. 2001. The Rejection of Authoritarianism. – Anderson R.D., Jr. et al. Postcommunism and the Theory of Democracy. Princeton.
Rustow D. 1970. Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamics Model. – Comparative Politics, vol. 2, № 3.
Rutland P. 1993. The Politics of Economic Stagnation in the Soviet Union: The Role of Local Party Organs in Economic Management. Cambridge.
Shleifer A., Treisman D. 2000. Without a Map: Political Tactics and Economic Reform in Russia. Cambridge.
Shevtsova L. 1999. Yeltsin’s Russia: Myths and Reality. Washington.
Shugart M.S., Carey J.S. 1992. Presidents and Assemblies: Constitutional Design and Electoral Dynamics. Cambridge.
Silitski V. 2005. Preempting Democracy: The Case of Belarus. – Journal of Democracy, vol. 16, № 4.
Solnick S. 2000. Is the Center Too Weak or Too Strong in the Russian Federation? – Sperling V. (ed.) Building the Russian State. Institutional Crisis and the Quest for Democratic Governance. Boulder.
Tompson W. 2005. Putting Yukos in Perspective. – Post-Soviet Affairs, vol. 21, № 2.
Treisman D. 1999. After the Deluge. Regional Crises and Political Consolidation in Russia. Ann Arbor.
Tversky A., Kahnemann D. 1986. The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. – Elster J. (ed.) Rational Choice. Oxford.
Urban M.E. 1989. An Algebra of Soviet Power: Elite Circulation in the Belorussian Republic 1966 – 1986. Cambridge.
Way L.A. 2005. Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Regime Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave: The Cases of Belarus, Moldova, Russia, and Ukraine. – World Politics, vol. 57, № 2.
Weingast B. 1997. The Political Foundations of Democracy and the Rule of Law. – American Political Science Review, vol. 91, № 2.
Wilson A. 1997. Ukraine: Two Presidents and Their Powers. – Taras R. (ed.) Post-Communist Presidents. Cambridge.
Wilson A. 1999. Ukraine. – Elgie R. (ed.) Semi-Presidentialism in Europe. Oxford.
Wilson A. 2005a. Ukraine’s Orange Revolution. New Haven.
Wilson A. 2005b. Virtual Politics: Faking Democracy in the Post-Soviet World. New Haven.
Zimmer K. 2004. The Captured Regions: Actors and Institutions in the Ukrainian Donbass. –Tatur M. (ed.) The Making of Regions in Post-Socialist Europe – the Impact of Culture, Economic Structure and Institutions. Vol. II. Wiesbaden.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.