Source: http://floridasentencing.blogspot.com/2017/11/sentencing-alernatives-for-violations.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 10:48:12+00:00

Document:
1State v. Meeks, 789 So. 2d 982 (Fla. 2001).
2See, Flores v. State, 46 So. 3d 102 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010) (conviction on new case need not precede sentencing on probation violation so long as court determines the violation has sufficient evidence defendant committed new offense); Morency v. State, 955 So. 2d 67, 68 n.1 (Fla. 3d DCA 2007) (new criminal offense can constitute a probation violation even if nolle prossed by the state); State v. Jenkins, 762 So. 2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000); Swilley v. State, 781 So. 2d 458, 460 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001) (filing of a nolle prosequi does not mean the trial court cannot find that defendant substantively violated his community control by committing new offenses); Christian v. State, 84 So. 3d 437 (Fla. 5th DCA 2012), review denied, 134 So. 3d 446 (Fla. 2014).
5Hill v. State, 927 So. 2d 1047 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006); State v. Brown, 855 So. 2d 270 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003).
7Yegge v. State, 186 So. 3d 553 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015).
8Eustache v. State, 199 So. 3d 484 (Fla. 4th DCA 2016). A former exception to this was that for offenses committed prior to July 1, 2006 where the defendant had successfully completed a Department of Corrections boot camp program and had subsequently violated the probation that followed, the trial court could impose a period of incarceration not to exceed 364 days in a specified facility for the violation. See Adderly v. State, 958 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 5th DCA 2007) and cases cited therein; Lamore v. State, 86 So. 3d 546 (Fla. 2d DCA 2012).
9Blacker v. State, 49 So. 3d 785 (Fla. 4th DCA 2010).
10See, Cosme v. State, 111 So. 3d 280 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.