Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/9657754/All-Criminal-Complaint-Clay-Cover
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 04:35:18+00:00

Document:
a government man/woman, may be tempted to fail intentionally.
copy them to the U.S. Attorney’s office for investigation.
PROBBLE CAUSE AFFIDAVIT OF WHICH ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AS IF WRITTEN IN FULL.
INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AS IF WRITTEN IN FULL.
WHICH ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AS IF WRITTEN IN FULL.
WITH AND THROUGH THE USE, ASSISTANCE AND AID OF A DEADLY WEAPON.
HEREIN AS IF WRITTEN IN FULL BY REFERENCE.
PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE WARRANT.
BE ISSUED AS PROVIDED BY LAW.
v. Huiet, 195 Ga. 780, 25 S.E.2d 806 (1943).
such." Burdick v. People, 36 N.E. 948, 949, 149 Ill. 600 (1894).
made by its authority, so far as they are consistent with constitutional limitations."
Ekern v. McGovern, 154 Wis. 157, 142 N.W. 595, 620 (1913), cases cited.
process”, Fed. Rules Civ. Proc., Rule 60(b)(4), 28 U.S.C.A.; U.S.C.A. Const.
Amend. 5 – Klugh v. U.S., 620 F.Supp. 892 (D.S.C. 1985).
Article 6 clause 2 of the Constitution for the United States of America.
obey it as a condition of their office of trust.
cause against property. "Rights" are property. A free man (i.e.
secured by the constitution in its “blessings of Liberty” clause.
i. MEANING IN THIS SOCIETY: Free justice, without delay.
The government will assume the entire cost of prosecution.
which will abrogate them.” Miranda v. Ariz., 384 U.S. 436 at 491 (1966).
constitutions are specifically Individual Life, Liberty and Property.
process vacates jurisdiction over the subject matter’, Johnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S.
replied ‘ I traveled using my private property upon the public right of way’.
way, and was not obstructing others use.
to prefer criminal charges against all who refuse to rightly prosecute their office of trust.
Missouri or due process of law.
their agents and therefore needs and is due this relief in order to again secure his liberty.
in an intentional injury to another. To do otherwise is intellectual dishonesty at the very least.
recognition of the laws against perjury.
with willful and wanton disregard for their duty and for Duffs right of action.
IN THE 7TH JUDICIAL COURT WITHIN AND FOR SAID COUNTY.
return hereof to this court.
in Jackson County of this state.
………………………………………………………………… , county of ……………………. State of ………….
said premises); that I have now placed said property so taken in the possession of this court.
AFFIDAVIT OF WHICH ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AS IF WRITTEN IN FULL.
THE USE, ASSISTANCE AND AID OF A DEADLY WEAPON.
AID OF A DEADLY WEAPON.
THIS COURT MAY FIND THE EXISTENCE OF PROBABLE CAUSE FOR THE ISSUANCE OF THE WARRANT.
owned right of way, and was not obstructing others use.
charges against all who refuse to rightly prosecute their office of trust..
cause shown, the judgment of the people of Missouri or due process of law.
is intellectual dishonesty at the very least.
affirmation of the truth herein contained and in recognition of the laws against perjury.
with willful and wanton disregard for their duty and for Duffs right of action..
CAUSE AFFIDAVIT OF WHICH ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AS IF WRITTEN IN FULL.
RESTRAINT BY, WITH AND THROUGH THE USE, ASSISTANCE AND AID OF A DEADLY WEAPON.
INCORPORATED HEREIN AS IF WRITTEN IN FULL BY REFERENCE.
implication, the common law rule remains valid”. N.E. & R. Partnership v.
constitution through article 13 clause 22 as a right retained by the individual people .
Zachos v. Huiet, 195 Ga. 780, 25 S.E.2d 806 (1943).
witnesses. Failure to do so is a denial of due process (see FN 1).
to dismiss as being moot.
said ‘you can read that in the paperwork’ and once again objected to the hearing in its entirety.
Gabbert had done and reasserted its default judgment.
the Magna Carta and every principle of justice in this society.
# 10 (f) and # 11 above and finally binds him as an accessory after the fact.
good cause shown (in derogation of #4 above).
the Tribunal that does have jurisdiction over the subject matter.
therein, did, without consideration for his consent or lack thereof, then imprison plaintiff Duff.
accomplice and was likely attempting to cover up the crimes associated therewith.
make return hereof to this court.
OF WHICH ARE INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE AS IF WRITTEN IN FULL.
THROUGH THE USE, ASSISTANCE AND AID OF A DEADLY WEAPON.
REFERENCE AS IF WRITTEN IN FULL..
America the “people”). Failure is a denial of due process.
witnesses. Failure to do so is a denial of due process.
or to hold an evidentiary hearing to determine jurisdiction. Williams did neither.
committed against Duff by Frazier and his agents.
Station before Duff was released and who called the bondsman on Duff’s behalf.
this relief in order to again secure his liberty.
law; and you, the officer serving this warrant, shall forthwith make return hereof to this court.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.