Source: http://chinaiprlaw.cn/index.php?id=4830
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 15:03:06+00:00

Document:
参见Special Report: Manufacturing and Innovation, ‘A Third Industrial Revolution’(2012) April 21 st-27th The Economist < http://www.economist.com/node/21552901> accessed 5 July 2015.
 Michael M. Lafeber, ‘The 3D Revolution: IP Issues Arising from the Proliferation of 3D Printing’ (2015) Briggs and Morgan: January 2015 Intellectual Property Roundtable 2.
 Feist Publications, Inc v. Rural Tel. Service Co., 499 U.S. 340-348 (1991).
 Hyperion Records v. Sawkins  RPC 32;  1 WLR 3281 (CA).
 Infopaq International A/S v. Danske Dagblades Forening Case C-55/08  ECDR 16.
 Football Dataco v. Yahoo! UK Ltd Case C-604/10  2 CMLR (24) 703.
 参见University of London Press Ltd v University Tutorial Press Ltd  2 Ch 601；又参见Sawkins v. Hyperion  1 WLR 3281, 3288,  per Mummery LJ.
 参见Hod Lipson & Melba Kurman, Fabricated: The New Word of 3D Printing (John Wiley & Sons Inc. 2013) 92-94.
 参见Hyperion Records v. Sawkins  RPC 32;  1 WLR 3281 (CA).
 B Rideout, ‘Printing the Impossible Triangle: The Copyright Implications of Three-Dimensional Printing’ (2011) 5(1) Journal of Business Entrepreneurship & Law 168.
 参见Matt Simon, ‘When copyright Can Kill: How 3D Printers Are Breaking The Barriers Between ― Intellectual Property And The Physical World’ (2013) 3 Pace Intell. Prop. Sports & Ent. L. F. 78.
 Directive 2009/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the legal protection of computer programs, Recital 7.
 Bezpečnostní Softwarová Asociace, Case C-393/09  ECR I-13971 (ECJ, Third Chamber), paras 28-42.
 SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd, Case C-406/10  3 CMLR (4) 55,  Bus LR 941.
 Stina Teilmann, ‘Framing the Law: the Right of Integrity in Britain’ (2005), E. I. P. R. 19.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.