Source: http://www.overruleroe.com/States/Michigan.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 12:37:59+00:00

Document:
In Larkin, the supreme court held that § 750.322 “is limited in its scope to abortions caused by felonious assault upon the mother, which result in the death of an unborn quick child en ventre sa mere.”10 Finally, in conformity with Roe v. Wade, the court held that the word “child,” as used in §§ 750.322 and 750.323, means “a viable child in the womb of its mother.”11 The pre-Roe statutes have not been repealed,12 and would be enforceable if Roe v. Wade were overruled.
1 Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. § 750.14 (West 1968).
4 208 N.W.2d 172 (Mich. 1973).
5 208 N.W.2d 176 (Mich. 1973).
6 Bricker, supra, n. 4, 208 N.W.2d at 175. This gloss on the pre-Roe statute effectively limited its application to post-viability abortions.
9 Id. at 176. See, e.g., People v. Higuera, 625 N.W.2d 444 (Mich. Ct. App. 2001) (upholding indictment of physician for performing non-therapeutic, post-viability abortion in violation of § 750.14, as construed by Bricker).
10 Larkin, supra, n. 5, 208 N.W.2d at 179.
12 See Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§ 750.14, 750.322, 750.323 (West 2004). The Michigan Court of Appeals has held that § 750.14 has not been repealed by implication with the enactment of substantial post-Roe legislation regulating abortion. See People v. Higuera, supra, n. 9, 625 N.W.2d at 444, 448-49.

References: § 750
 v. 
 v. 
 § 750
 v. 
 § 750
 § 750
 v.