Source: http://www.kmfpc.com/attorneys/michael_s_kelley.aspx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 08:19:35+00:00

Document:
A 1990 graduate of Harvard Law School, MICHAEL S. KELLEY practices in the areas of municipal law, commercial litigation, and healthcare fraud. Mr. Kelley is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, the U.S. Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, and the trial and appellate courts of the State of Tennessee. From 1998-2004, Mr. Kelley served as the Law Director for the City of Knoxville. In this position, he represented the City, the Mayor, and other municipal officials in all types of lawsuits in state and federal court and in various regulatory matters. Since returning to private practice, Mr. Kelley has focused on civil litigation and internal investigations for private companies and governmental entities.
Williams v. Redflex Traffic Systems, Inc., 582 F.3d 617 (6th Cir. 2009); Lowery v. Jefferson Cnty. School Bd., 586 F.3d 427 (6th Cir. 2009); Monday Foundation v. Diocese of East Tennessee, 2008 Tenn. App. LEXIS 771 (2008); Massey v. R.W.Graf, Inc., 277 S.W.3d 902 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2008); Hockett v. Columbia/HCA Healthcare Corp., 498 F. Supp. 2d 25 (D.D.C. 2007); Lane v. Am. Gen. Life & Accident Ins. Co., 252 S.W.3d 289 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2007); Sharpe v. Cureton, 319 F.3d 259 (6th Cir. 2003); Alcoa v. LGPAC, 123 S.W.3d 351 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2003); Thompson v. Ashe, 250 F.3d 399 (6th Cir. 2001); Lovelace v. City of Knoxville, 2001 Tenn. App. LEXIS 198 (2001); Doane v. City of Oak Ridge, 898 S.W.2d 828 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1995).
“‘Something Beyond’: The Unconditional Vagueness of RICO’s Pattern Requirement,” 40 Catholic University Law Review No. 2 (1991).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.