Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Law-Real-Estate-Brokers/Supp-Ch-V-Broker-Acting-For-Both-Parties-Continued.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 02:38:06+00:00

Document:
Ramey v. Sturgeon, 86 S. E. (Ga.) 660 (1915); Madden v. Davis, 192 111. App. 575 (1915).
American Security & Investment Co. v. Penney, 129 Minn. 369; 152 N. W. 771 (1915).
3 Silberkraus v. Winnie, 158 App. Div. 50; 142 N. Y. Suppl. 887 (1913). 4 Ramey v. Sturgeon, 86 S. E. (Ga.) 660 (1915). And see Mecum v. Moyer, 166 App. Div. 793, 805; 152 N. Y. Suppl. 385 (1915). 5See Sec. 220 6Head note'in Hladik v. Allen, 26 Cal.. App. 509; 147 Pac. 474 (1915).
King v. Reed, 24 Cal. App. 229; 141 Pac. 41 (1914); Langford v. Issenhuth, 28 S. D. 451; 134 N. W. 889; Jordan v. Anderson, 155 N. W. (S. D.) 769 (1915).
Jacobs v. Beyer, 141 App. Div. 49; 125 N. Y. Suppl. 597 (1910).
See also Nichols v. Greenstreet, 71 Misc. 196; 130 N. Y. Suppl. 843 (1911); affd. 146 App. Div. 940; 131 N. Y. Suppl. 1131.
7 Jacobs v. Beyer, 141 App. Div. 49; 125 N. Y. Suppl. 597 (1910). 8 Rees v. Gair, 144 App. Div. 294; 129 N. Y. Suppl. 213 (1911). 9Nichols v. Greenstreet, 71 Misc. 196, 130 N. Y. Suppl. 843 (1911); affd., 146 App. Div. 940; 131 N. Y. Suppl. 1131.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.