Source: http://ohiolawinfo.blogspot.com/2005_12_11_archive.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 10:06:13+00:00

Document:
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-A-767.
2005-1074. Silver Lake v. Metro Regional Transit Auth.
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion to supplement is denied.
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is denied as moot.
It has now come to the court's attention that the respondent is deceased.
2005-2311. Bedford Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-A-287.
2005-2006. State ex rel. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc. v. Indus. Comm.
The Supreme Court of Ohio's weekly release of decisions contains one sure to draw a lot of interest. The second one below offers a link to the full text.
2004-0695. Williams v. Akron , 2005-Ohio-6268.
Summit App. No. 21306, 2003-Ohio-7197. Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
2004-2114. Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Sharp Estate Serv., Inc., 2005-Ohio-6267.
On Final Report by the Board on the Unauthorized Practice of Law, No. UPL 02-1. Sharp Estate Services, Inc., Asset Preservation Group, Inc., Sharp Estate & Insurance Services, Inc., Jeffrey G. Sharp, Robert Clapacs, Diane C. Sharp, Henry W. Abts III, and The Estate Plan are enjoined from conduct that constitutes the unauthorized practice of law in Ohio , and civil penalty is imposed.
2005-0349. Disciplinary Counsel v. Wheatley, 2005-Ohio-6266.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 03-072. Myron Daniel Wheatley, Attorney Registration No. 0038584, is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months.
2005-0452. Harmon v. Baldwin , 2005-Ohio-6264.
Licking App. No. 04CA116, 2005-Ohio-722. Judgment affirmed.
2005-1157. Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Melnick, 2005-Ohio-6265.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 04-066. Robert Melnick, Attorney Registration No. 0014788, is publicly reprimanded.
2004-1101. Estate of Cowling v. Estate of Cowling.
Lorain App. No. 01CA007944 and 03CA008226, 2004-Ohio-2655.
within twenty days of the date of this entry.
Lake App. No. 2004-L-189, 2005-Ohio-2655.
2005-1932. Time Warner Operations, Inc. v. Wilkins.
2005-1933. Time Warner Entertainment v. Wilkins.
comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed, sua sponte.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.