Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Right-to-extinguish-by-payment-Right-to-redeem-a-Persons-entitled-Part-7.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 02:23:47+00:00

Document:
The mortgagee in possession is required to account for rents and profits when the person seeking to redeem is a junior mortgagee as well as when he is the mortgagor himself, the junior mortgagee representing the mortgagor for this purpose.77 And this has been held to be the case even though the mortgagee.
73. Hodges v. Verner, 100 Ala. 6l2, .13 So. 679; Ray v. Pitman, 119 Ga. 678. 46 S. B. 849; Way v. Muliett, 143 Mass. 49, 8 N. E. 881; Hoopes v. Bailey, 28 Miss. 328; Jopling v. Walton, 138 Mo. 48",, 40 S. W. 99; Eastman v. Thayer, 60 N. H. 408; Berkman v. Frost, 18 Johns.. (N. Y.) 544, 9 Am. Dec. 246; Marshall v. Stewart, 17 Ohio, 356; Jones v. Porter. 29 Tex. 456; American Bean & Trust Co v. Atlanta Elec. R. Co., 99 Fed. 313. But see contra, Nye v. Swan, 49 Minn. 431. 52 N. W. 39; Beach v. Cooke, 28 N. Y. 508, 86 Am. Dec.. 260; Casserly v. Withevbee. 119 N. Y. 522,' 23 N. E. 1000.
21 Am. St. Rep. 231, 25 N, E. 558; De Leonis v. Walsh, 140 Cal. 175. 73. Pac. 813; Smith v. Conner, 65 Ala. 371.
75. See Williams v. Norton 139 Ala. 402, 36 So. 11; Bartlett v. Fellows, 47 Me. 53; Doody v. Pierce, 9 Allen (Mass.) 141; Mer-riam v. Goss, 139 Mass. 77. 28 N. E. 449; Shouler v. Bonander, SO Mich. 531, 45 N. W. 487; Bellows v. Stone, 18 N. H. 465; Ross v. Eoardman, 22 Hun. (N. Y.) 527; McDonald v. McBeod, 36 N. C. 221; Reeder v. Trullinger, 151 Pa. St. 2S7, 24 Atl. 1104; Feamster v. Withrow, 9 W. Va. 296.
77. Long v Richards, 170 mass 120, 64 Aim. St. Rep. 281, 48 N. E 1083; Clark v. paquette. 67 Vl.
681, 32 Atl. 812; Gaskell v. Vi-quesney, 122 Ind. 244, 17 Am. St. Rep. 364, 23 N. E. 791.
78. Harrison v. Wyse, 24 Conn. 1 63 Am. Dec. 151; Clark v. Paquette, 67 Vt. 681, 32 Atl. 812.
79. Hart v. Chase, 46 Conn. 207.
80. Adler-Goldman Commission Co v. Herren, 65 Ark. 229, 45 S. W. 543; Rogers v. Herren, 92 111. 583; Gray v. Nelson, 77 Iowa, 63, 41 N. W. 566.
Ohio St. 104; Moore v. Degraw, 5 N. J. Eq. 346.
82. Harrill v. Stapleton, 55 Ark. 1, 16 S. W. 474; Clark v. Finlon, 90 111. 245; Miller v. Peter, 158 Mich. 336, 122 N. W. 780; Cookes v. Culbertson, 9 Nev. 199.
83. Gaskell v. Viquesney, 122 Ind. 244, 17 Am. St. Rep. 364, 23 N. E. 791; Sloane v. Lucas, 37 Wash. 348, 79 Pac. 949.
84. Longino v. Ball-Warren Commission Co., 84 Ark. 521, 106 S. W. 682; Gaskell v. Viquesney, 122 Ind. 244, 17 Am. St. Rep 364, 23 N. E. 791; Gault v. Equitable Trust Co., 100 Ky. 578, 38 S. W. 1065; Penard v. Brown, 7 Neb. 449. Contra, Ten Eyck v. Casad, 15 Iowa, 524.
85. Hannon v. Hilliard, 83 Ind. 363; Long v. Richards, 170 Mass. 120, 64 Am. St. Rep. 281, 48 N. E 1083.
86. Bremer v. Calumet & C Canal & Dock Co., 127 111. 464, 18 N. E. 321; Dennett v. Codman, 158 Mass. 371, 33 N. E. 574; Mc-Kenna v. Kirkwood, 50 Mich. 544, 15 N. W. 898; Perine v. Dunn, 4 Johns. Ch. (N. Y.) 140; Martin v. Ratcliff, 101 Mo. 254, 20 Am. St. Rep. 605, 13 S. W. 1051.
Dennett v. Codman, 158 Mass. 371, 33 N. E. 574; Sloane v. Lucas, 37 Wash. 348, 79 Pac. 949.
88. Perine v. Dunn, 4 Johns. Ch. (N. Y.) 140; Clark v. Rey-burn, 8 Wall. (U. S.) 318, 19 L. Ed. 354. .

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.