Source: https://rebelliouslawyeringinstitute.org/bill-ong-hing-bibliography/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 16:43:20+00:00

Document:
Here is a partial list of the works of Bill Ong Hing.
When INS Breaks the Rules Courts Will Listen, 4 AILA Immigration J., No. 3 (1981), p. 8.
The Ninth Circuit: No Place for Drug Offenders, 10 GOLDEN GATE L. REV. 1 (1980). Cited in TapiaAcuna v. INS, 640 F.2d 223, 225 (9th Cir. 1981).
No Place for Angels, A Woman`s Experience on the Island, Asian Week, Vol. 1, No. 17, Dec. 22, 1979.
An Overview of Federal Immigration Policies and Their Effects on Asian and Pacific Americans, Civil Rights Issues of Asian and Pacific Americans: Myths and Realities, U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, p. 292 (1979).
In re Sergio Garcia, Bar Misc. 4186 (2012), before the California Supreme Court, on the issue of whether an undocumented law graduate who has passed the bar exam should be admitted to practice law.
INS v. Yueh-Shaio Yang, 519 U.S. 26 (1996), immigration case involving a waiver of fraud committed by immigrant in which Supreme Court found no abuse of discretion by INS.
INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 (1987): asylum case in which the Supreme Court held that in order to qualify for asylum, applicants do not have to show likelihood of persecution of better than fifty percent; asylum law should be construed generously.
INS v. Pangilinan, 486 U.S. 875 (1988): denial of equitable remedy for Filipino war veteran seeking naturalization some 30 years after serving in U.S. armed forces in World War II. In 1990, Congress responded by enacting legislation granting relief to this class of veterans.
Wall v. INS, 722 F.2d 1445 (9th Cir. 1984): Established that residence accrued during period of appeal was legal for purposes of establishing eligibility for relief.
McMullen v. INS, 658 F.2d 1312 (9th Cir. 1981): Political asylum case involving former member of the Provisional Irish Republican Army, granted. It was the first case testing the 1980 Refugee Act that reached the Federal Court of Appeals and established evidentiary precedent.
Mahdjoubi v. Crosland, 618 F.2d 1356 (9th Cir. 1980): Due process and A.P.A. challenge to INS regulations denying reinstatement of Iranian Students.
Yassini v. Crosland, 613 F.2d 219 (9th Cir. 1980): Estoppel challenge to INS revocation of a temporary sanctuary program that had theretofore been established for Iranian nationals in the United States.
Matter of Atanacio, 56 Interpreter Releases 515a (BIA 1979): Exclusion of returning lawful permanent resident who had received public benefits overturned.
Cuevas-Ortega v. INS, 588 F.2d 1274 (9th Cir. 1979): Challenge to certain Fourth Amendment violations committed by immigration officers during their arrests of certain aliens denied.
Lopez-Telles v. INS, 564 F.2d 1302 (9th Cir. 1977): Inherent authority in an Immigration Judge to terminate proceedings on humanitarian grounds not found.
U.S. v. Mendoza-Lopez, 481 U.S. 828 (1987): Supreme Court agreed that waivers of hearing rights by a group of aliens in deportation proceedings violated due process.
Kush, et al, v. Rutledge, 460 U.S. 719 (1983): civil rights case involving the intimidation of witnesses and NCAA rules violations in a case filed by a football player against his coach.
Utility Consumers’ Action Network, et al. v. Pacific Bell, 98-04-004, 98-06-003, 98-06-027 (Public Utilities Commission 1998) (consumer complaint on behalf of immigrant customers).
Committee of Central American Refugees v. INS, 682 F. Supp. 1055 (N.D. Cal. 1988) (challenge to government transfer policy of arrested immigrants).
Beatriz Sanchez, et al v. Pinkerton’s Inc., No. H2072397 (Cal. Superior Court, Alameda Co. 2000) (right of family of deceased undocumented worker to pursue wrongful death action).
People v. Preet Paul Singh, No. EE14887 (Cal. Superior Court Santa Clara Co. 2001) (right of immigrant to full procedural due process rights in criminal proceedings).
Peter Guzman and Maria Carbajal v. US Immigration Customs Enforcement and Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, No. CV 08-01327 GHK (U.S. District Court, Central District of California 2009) (deported U.S. citizen tort and civil rights action against federal and local governmental agencies).
Barrancos Gongorra and Cano v. Fiesta Mex, LLC, No. CGC-06-457121 (Superior Court of San Francisco County 2008) (right of wrongfully arrested and detained immigrant to sue informant who called ICE with false information).
In re Sambath Kon, A25 373 338 (Federal Immigration Court, Los Angeles Mar. 30, 2012) (convention against torture claim for Cambodian respondent).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.