Source: https://es.scribd.com/document/2727650/WAKA-LLC-v-DCKICKBALL-et-al-Document-No-24
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 03:07:32+00:00

Document:
Vinzons-Chato v. Fortune Tobacco Corp.
WAKA LLC v. DCKICKBALL et al Doc.
1. Stan V. Smith, Ph. D.
listing of prior testimony is attached as Exhibit B.
upon entry of a protective order.
DUNLAP, GRUBB & WEAVER P.C.
S T A N V. S M I T H, P H. D.
employment discrimination, identity theft and FCRA credit damages.
years. This was the first course taught nationwide in the area of Forensic Economics.
sophisticated research, search, and recovery technologies for ancient underwater artifacts.
and financing specialized start-ups with venture capital.
Assistant in Economics, 3/70 to 6/73.
marketing to retail and industrial clients; responsible for production control.
Econometrics. Honors: Allied Chemical Scholar and Federal Reserve Internship.
National Futures Association's Panel of Arbitrators, Arbitrator, 1994 to present.
Author, 1988 Supp.to Vol 13, Am Jur Proof of Facts 2d on Hedonic Damages.
Author, "Hedonic Damages" Illinois Tort Report, June, 1988.
Author, "Hedonic Damages in Wrongful Death Cases," the ABA Journal, Sept,1988.
Author, "Hedonic Damages," The Audio Lawyer, Vol. 6 No. 8, ALI-ABA, February, 1989.
with M. L. Brookshire, Anderson Publishing Co., Cinn., Ohio, 1990.
of Forensic Economics, 3(3), 1990, pp. 41-49.
Bulletin, Vol. 1, No. 8, June 1991.
Chapter 7, pp. 121-129, 1992.
Author, "Hedonic Damages in the Courtroom Setting - A Bridge Over Troubled Waters,,"
Publishing Co., Chapter 6, pp. 111-120, 1992.
Bar Journal, Vol 80, No. 12, December, 1992, pp. 635-638.
Anderson Publishing Co., Cinn., Ohio, 1993.
National Head Injury Foundation, Wash., DC, 1993.
Analysis, Vol 74, JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1993.
1994, pp. 24-25, California Bar Journal, The Experts.
Kentucky Academy of Trial Attorneys.
No. 4, September 1995, pp. 9-11, 24.
Lawyers & Judges Publishing Co., Reading 25, 1996, pp. 325-334.
Iowa Trial Lawyers Association, Vol. 7/Issue 1, January-February 1996, pp. 13-15.
Lawyers & Judges Publishing Co., Reading 3, 1996, pp. 15-36.
Trial Lawyers' Foundation, Vol. XXIV, No. 3, March, 1996, pp. 1, 60-63.
Volume 25, Number 2, Summer 1996, pp. 32-36.
Edited by Thomas R. Ireland and John O. Ward, Lawyers & Judges Publishing Co., 1996, pp.
Counsel Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 1, Fall 1996, pp. 95-105.
Trial Lawyers Association, pp. 32, 35-36.
Dissertation Services, Ann Arbor, MI, 1997.
Board of Trial Advocates, pp. 19-21 & 25.
Damages," The Neurolaw Letter, Vol. 9, No. 8, April 2000, pp. 45, 48-49.
Psychological Injuries at Trial, Torts Section, American Bar Association, 2003.
current year & previous years' editions.
D. Rodgers, Gerald D. Martin, Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc., 2005.
Counsel" Column, March 2006, pg. 73.
DC Masters Advocacy Program, "Direct and Cross Examination of an Economic Witness,"
Techniques, "Loss of Society and Household Companionship and Advisory Services,"
Mississippi: Arkansas Trial Lawyer Assn. "Maximizing Damages in the Personal Injury Case,"
Damages after September 11th and An Economist's View on Proving Economic Damages,"
Injury," Green Lake, May 31, 1997.
Honorable Discharge U.S. Army, 1975.
Karastoyanov v. Jain, et al.
Mittenthal v. Swedish Covenant Hospital, et al.
Miller v. Thelen Sand & Gravel, Inc., et al.
Starks, et al. v. Interstate Highway Construction, et al.
Hemminger v. Lemay, et al.
Smith et al. v. Payne, et al.
McGee v. University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center, et al.
Owen, et al. v. Ghia M.D; Elmhurst, et al.
Luark, et al. v. Viking Construction Company, Inc., et al.
Parsons, et. al. v. The City of Corinth, Mississippi, et al.
Guilbeaux v. Kansas City Southern Railway Company, et al.
Hill v. Ob/Gyn Specialists, et al.
Lavern v. Illinois Masonic Medical Center, et al.
Yourchuck v. Burnett County, et al.
Miles v. Jewish Hospital Healthcare Services, Inc, et al.
Dasbach v. American Commercial Lines, et al.
Gillespie v. University of Chicago Hospitals, et al.
Burnwatt v. Baptist Memorial Hospital, et al.
Gossett v. Jae Eun Han, MD, et al.
Bonar v. General Motors Corporation, et al.
Jaghab v. Merz, et al.
Scott v. Christian Health Services Development Corp, et al.
Westbook v. Dollar Rent A Car, Inc, et al.
Lord v. Argentina Consolidated Mining Company, et al.
Stanley, Administrator of Estate of Love, Deceased, v. City of Chicago, et al.
Lenoir and Stokes v. Shelby County Healthcare Corp, et al.
Butler v. Regional Medical Center , et al.
Delgado & Cochran v. Borysewich, et al.
Kinstel v. Wilson, AutoZone, Inc, et al.
Chambers v. Linn-Mathes, Inc, et al.
Moon v. Gwinnett Hospital System, Inc., et al.
Sweet v. Bareman Dairy, et al.
Terry v. Gray, et al.
Mullinax v. Wojcik, et al.
Esho v. Weed, et al.
Perrier v. Gonzales, et al.
White and McLaughlin v. Bromenn Healthcare Inc, et al.
Diffenderfer v. Corporate Airlines, Inc., et al.
Barrera v. Mota Construction Co., et al.
Gutierrez, et al. v. Phelps Dodge Miami, Inc., et al.
Rasmussen and Ahlstrom v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
Gleeson v. Stephani, M.D., et al.
Tradex and Pahlen v. Conair Corp.
Villanueva v. Township of Bloomfield, et al.
Law Firm= Blume, Goldfaden, Berkowitz, Donnelly, Fried & Forte, Chatham, N.J.
Marek v. Gumarin et al.
Klipfel & Casali v. Rubin, et al.
Catrone v. Mercy Healthcare Arizona, et al.
Kordek v. Vijay Marwaha, M.D., et al.
Cesario v. O'Dowd, et al.
Upper Iowa University v. University of Dubuque, et al.
Burdick v. Field, et al.
Kumar, et al., v. Toyota et al.
Vigil v. Advocate Health and Hospitals Corp., et al.
Borbely v. Temptec, Inc., et al.
Fritz, Special Administrator for Estate of Cade, et al.
Bazzell v. MN Hospitality, Inc., et al.
Hershey v. Black & Decker (U.S.), Inc., et al.
Pessoa v. Pacific Avenue Realty, et al.
Ibrahim v. Siegal, et al.
Eichhorn v. Metal Management Midwest, et al.
Weidner v. G.F. Structures Corp., et al.
Vanderwerff v. Spectrum Health, et al.
Johnson v. Wood County, et al.
Tabe v. Ausman, MD, et al.
Galica v. The Ryland Group, et al.
Schultz v. Lemke, et al.
Cowan v. Skyjack, Inc., et al.
Lissuzzo v. Flores, et al.
Vazquez v. Panmex Baking Comapnay, et al.
Hollifield v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
Drake v. CLC of Jesup, et al.
Sauer v. Konecki, et al.
LaMar v. J.I. Case Co., et al.
Tucker v. SmithKline Beecham, et al.
Brooks as Conservator of Fravel, a Minor v. Norton Hospitals, Inc., et al.
Estate of Halek by Guardian Dawn Carlson v. Kingsport Development, et al.
Brumfield v. Tyson Foods, Inc., et al.
Ortega v. Edison Orozco, et al.
Bellinaso v. Power Construction Company, et al.
Land v. Sells, et al.
Corbett v. Azzarelli, et al.
Crary v. Johanson, et al.
Briesacher v. AMG Resources, et al.
Duarte v. Midwest Masonry, et al.
Ferrari v. Anglin & Ryder Student Transportation Services, Inc.
Dunn v. Hyster Co., et al.
Worthy v. McNair, M.D., et al.
Fernandez, et al., v. ATA, et al.
Ingrassia v. Dr. Beth Royston, M.D., et al.
Senzel v. Barton, et al.
Zuback v. Broome, et al.
Juan Mejia v. Andrew Chenelle, et al.
Vanderhyden vs. FISHER DEVELOPMENT CORP., et al.
Cousins v. Li, MD, et al.
Tsaknis v. United States of America, et al.
Lujan v. Rauth, MD, et al.
Mehta v. The Cobb County School District, et al.
Chapman v. Northwestern Cardiology & Internal Medicine, et al.
Ison v. Peterson, M.D., et al.
Turner v. Knox, M.D., et al.
Hernandez v. ALL Masonry, et al.
Shah v. Wilco Systems, Inc.
DiMuzio v. Salvador, MD, et al.
Field v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al.
Block v. Palos Community Hospital,et al.
Wende Jr. v. Turner Construction Company, et al.
Petit v. Gottlieb Memorial Hospital, et al.
Howard v. Walsh Construction Company of Illinois, et al.
Chandrupatla v. Toyota Motor Corp, et al.
Hernandez v. Catholic Health Partners Services, et al.
Williams v. B & H Towing, Inc.
Sall v. Fedex Kinko's Office & Print Services, Inc.
Teske v. A. H. Bennett Company, et al.
Ruiz v. Vitello, MD, et al.
Law Firm= Lewin & Lewin; Washington, D.C.
Herrick v. Juelin Tang, M.D., et al.
Donohoe v. Robert Koss, M.D., et al.
Arnett & Lemaster v. Leslie Resources, Inc., et al.
Dancho v. Commonwealth Edison Co., et al.
Kenney v. Commonwealth Edison Company, et al.
Simon v. The Malnati Organization, Inc.
Clay v. Hackley Hospital, et al.
Vayalil v. Majumdar, MD, et al.
Ruffolo v. Waste Management of Illinois, Inc., et al.
Bell v. Holy Cross Hospital, et al.
Backstrom v. Mayo Clinic Arizona, et al.
Karpay, et al. v. Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc, et al.
Rupert v. Becker, M.D., & Andrews, M.D.
Ehrenfried v. Patterson, et al.
Dupuis, et al. v. Reichwein Jr, et al.
Sexton v. Transport Ajit, Inc., et al.
Smith for Estate of Sizemore v. Dr. Bruce Genovese, et al.
Hill, et al., vs. Dr. Chao, et al.
Connie L. Hunt and Erica Hunt v. Kaufman & Broad of Nevada, Inc., et al.
Quill v. Rooney, et al.
Acme Allied Associates v. The Trizetto Group, Inc.
Wells v. Savoy Energy Limited Partnership, et al.
Gardner, Individually v. Diagnostic Medical Imaging, et al.
Bonwell v. Northwest Suburban Community Hospital, Inc, et al.
Fuller v. 6230 N. Kenmore Apartments, et al.
Andrew Moyle v. Mark R. Shebuski M.D, et al.
Duarte v. Brane, Inc., et al.
Gilley & Barnett v. Airborne Freight Corporation, et al.
Korzeniewski v. Ryan & Smith, Inc., et al.
D'Arcy v. Monson, et al.
Evans v. McLaren Regional Medical Center, et al.
Thornwood, Inc. et al. v. Jenner & Block, et al.
Florre v. Correctional Health Services, Inc, et al.
Otterstein v. Murray Transportation, Inc., et al.
Richie v. Northern Indiana Public Service Company, et al.
Margaret Minnisch, Administrator ad Prosequendum for the Estate of Frank C.
Minnisch, SR and Margaret Minnisch, individually, v. Cardinal Health 409, Inc.
Carmody v. Illinois Bone and Joint Institute, Ltd., et al.
Geroge Shemon and Helen Shemon v. David Cooper M.D. et al.
Johnson v. OSF Healthcare System, et al.
Douglas v. Ferguson, M.D., et al.
Ray v. Kempf, M.D, et al.
Marquardt v. Branislav Dragisic, MD, et al.
Joy Pannell and Robert Pannell v. Ernest B. Lowe, Jr. M.D.
Jones v. West Suburban Hospital Medical Center, et al.
Cannon v. Toops II,et al.
Lynch v. Malek, MD, et al.
Perez v. Oakland County, et al.
McMichael v. Commonwealth Ear, Nose & Throat, et al.
Romo, a minor, by mother Esparza v. Mercy Hospital medical Center, et al.
Miller, et al. v. Petty, et al.
Ross v. City of Chicago, et al.
Howdershelt v. Litton Loan Servicing, et al.
Dragicevich v. Arnold, M.D, et al.
Henry & Klugman v. Low, M.D., et al.
Turman v. Duo Right Bus Company, et al.
Thompson v. Caritas Health Services, Inc, et al.
Lewis v. Prinz, et al.
Reyes, et al. v. Last Chance Liquors, Inc., et al.
Ophoff v. The Home Depot, et al.
Carey v. White & United Parcel Service Co.
Foggy v. Scotti, et al.
Brewer, Jr. v. Sun Trust Bank, et al.
Bowman v. Dombrowski & Homes, Inc.
Tracy v. Freund, D.O., et al.
McMickle v. Griffin, et al.
Byzewski v. Aerotek, Inc., et al.
Pryor v. Holy Cross Hospital, et al.
Avalon Carriage Service, Inc., v. City of St. Augustine, Florida, et al.
Munari v. Dr. Pepper/Seven Up Bottling Group, Inc., et. al.
Mansfeld v. Bishop Construction, Inc., et al.
Mansfield v. Sjolund, D.O., et al.
Raju as Special Administrator of Estate of Bell v. LaDore, et al.
Ford, Conservator of Waters v. Norton Hospitals, Inc., et al.
Horak v. F.S.C. Paper Corporation, et al.
Walden v. Kingsman, M.D., et al.
Cohill v. Charleston Place Owners Association, et al.
Burley, Parent/Guardian of Hill v. Douglas, et al.
Brown v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railroad Company, et al.
Whitman v. Rogers, MD, et al.
Bulmash v. Piedmont Hospital, Inc., et al.
Bagnall v. Rosemont Exposition Services, Inc., et al.
Young, et al. v. RSB Logistic, Inc.
Evans v. Lima Lima Flight Tean, Inc., et al.
Glaeser v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
Miller v. Lemke, et al.
Simmer v. Ford Motor Company, et al.
Marten v. Gruber, et al.
Rickard v. Joseph J. Henderson and Sons, Inc, et al.
Jensen v. ARV Nevada Assisted Living, Inc., et al.
Mattson v. Kenneth Elmer Root, et al.
VanSleet v. Jimmy'Z Masonry Corp, et al.
Brown v. Cirque du Soleil Holding USA, Inc., et al.
Davis v. Henderson, M.D., et al.
Richman v. Michael Sheahan, et al.
Cahnman v. Doerge, et al.
Oppelt v. Wirtgen, et al.
French, Representative of Estate of McMillan v. Lord, et al.
Carney v. Anchor Packing Co., et al.
Buckler v. Victor, D.O., et al.
Hill & Young v. Logemann Brothers Company, et al.
Flaherty v. Thyssen Krup Elevator Corporation, et al.
Pierce v. System Transport, Inc., et al.
Sunia, et al. v. Banner Health System, et al.
Knapczyk v. Township of Stickney, et al.
Van Roeyen v. Resurrection Health Care, et al.
Hawkins v. Anatomic Pathology Associates, et al.
Murray v. Great Bay Building Co, et al.
Peszek v. James McMahon, et al.
Vazquez v. Rodes Fabricators, Inc., et al.
Erlichman v. Arlington Heights Lanes, Inc.
Young v. Tellabs, Inc., et al.
Servellon v. Guerriero, M.D., et al.
Mermelstein v. Moshe Menora, et al.
Hopkins v. Desert Pulmonary Consultants, et al.
Hart, et al. v. A. W. Chesterton Co., et al.
Burnham v. Roguske, et al.
Orlich & Lello v. Ugarte, M.D., et al.
Stracener & O'Neal v. Thomas Williams, M.D., et al.
Anderson v. American Medical Association, et al.
Pirman v. Gkizas, et al.
Kinney, Representative of Tratnik v. Geil, et al.
Welch v. Norton Hospitals, Inc., et al.
May v. Village of LaGrange, et al.
Verburg v. Kalish, DPM, et al.
Barnak v. Pep Boys Manny, Moe and Jack, Inc., et al.
Hoskins v. Nutraquest, Inc., et al.
Lewis v. City of Chicago, et al.
Renfro v. Chicago Housing Authority, et al.
Martinez v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Montana, Inc., et al.
Wolverton v. Les Schwab Tire Centers of Montana, Inc., et al.
Geil v. G.R.A.T.A., et al.
Davis v. Dr. Daran Hom, et al.
Donnell v. Terex-Telelect, Inc., et al.
Lagestee v. Ingalls Hospital, et al.
Martin v. Forrester, et al.
Boim v. Quranic Literacy Institute, et al.
Brown v. Sidney Dorsey, et al.
Nicholson v. Morris Hospital, et al.
Addelia & Hoover v. Mercy Healthcare Arizona, Inc., et al.
Neve v. Sunrise Hospital and Medical Center, et al.
Hudson v. Quinn, et al.
Kalk v. Beckstrom Enterprises, Inc., et al.
Davis, et al. v. Lutheran High School Assn. of St. Louis, et al.
Haltom v CSX Transportation, Inc.
Wilson v. Wilson Care, Inc.
Hohn v. Woodside Homes of Nevada, et al.
Jinkins v. Lee, et al.
Penuela v. County of Los Angeles, et al.
DeCastro v. Randall, Daimler Chrysler Corp.
Williams v. Lafear and Transport Corporation of American, Inc.
Siavelis v. Target Corporation, et al.
Pietruszka v. Collier, et al.
Kandisbrat, et al. v. Dr. Sung Ky Paik, et al.
Schramek v. Sara Lee Corporation, et al.
Trotter v. Washington Construction, et al.
Ingram v. Sheriff Primus, et al.
Sanchez v Anderson, et al.
Nenninger v. Wolff, M.D., et al.
Hamre v. Abrar Mirza, Ann Marie Baratta, et al.
Van Velson v. Oak White, et al.
Dioso v. Griswold, et al.
Anderson v. Coulson Oil Company, Inc., et al.
Ethridge v. Welsh Machine Tool Co., Inc., et al.
Mullaney v. L.I.M. International, et al.
Bond v. Principle Construction Company, et al.
Laduke as Conservator of Sapp v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc., et al.
Hood as Administratrix of Estate of Jones v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al.
Montgomery v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., et al.
Dudek v. The Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company, et al.
Pierrot v. Cargill Detroit Corporation, et al.
Landt v. Verseman, M.D., et al.
Ramirez v. North Oakland Medical Center, et al.
Daggit v. McGee, et al.
Heger v. Loyola University Medical Center of Chicago, et al.
Stevenson v. Pulte Homes of Michigan, Corp, et al.
Gray, Individually & as Representative of Williams v. State of Kansas, et al.
Walker v. Smith's Food & Drug Centers, Inc., et al.
Cammerino v. First Transit, Inc., et al.
Pittman v. William Bergen, M.D., et al.
Trahan v. Salem Subway Restaurant, et al.
Mary Beth McErlean for Estate of Victim John Thomas McErlean, Jr.
Heidlage v. Terra Renewal Services, Inc., et al.
Davenport, et al. v. International Truck and Engine Corporation, et al.
Lankton & Schultz v. Granger Container Service, Inc., et al.
Welchel v. Transcontinental Refrigerated Lines, Inc. et al.
Spencer v. The Successors of the late Fitzroy Messam, et al.
Chandler v. Martinez, et al.
Terry v. Shelby County Health Care Corp, et al.
02-27-2004 by Telephone for Hearing in Office of Special Master Kenneth R.
Winkler, Administrator of Estate of Hall v. Dr. John P. Bethell, et al.
Martin v. Neerhof, et al.
Sarantakis, et al. v. Hambrecht & Quist, Inc.
Paul v. Weilhammer, M.D., et al.
Hoffman v. Field, et al.
Locricchio v. Parker, et al.
Rossi v. New York Life Insurance Co, et al.
Martinez, et al. v. Owens-Brockway, et al.
Luis Garcia v. NSC-II, Ltd., et al.
Williams v. Fuchs & Canadian National, et al.
Spata v. Holy Family Medical Center, et al.
Scott v. Jemielita, et al.
Fifth Third Bank, et al.
Goodwin v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc., et al.
Greviskes v. Universities Research Associates, Inc., et al.
DeJesus v. Illinois Masonic Medical Center, et al.
Sanchez v. The Pillsbury Co., et al.
No. 99 L 7577 "D"
Mihalovits v. Village of Crestwood, et al.
Jones v. Sanford, et al.
Stanley v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
Vargas v. Calco Express, Inc., et al.
Seidel v. Gandhi, et al.
No. 99 L 14858 "B"
Pinckney v. Martinez, et al.
Patterson v. Kloc, et al.
McSwain, et al. v. Powe Timber Company, et al.
McHugh v. Scott Co. of California, et al.
Wade v. City of Chicago, et al.
Greenway, et al. v. Mitsubishi Motor Manufacturing of America, Inc., et al.
Skinkis v. Advocate Health & Hospitals Corp, et. al.
Parker v. Henson III, et al.
Rudd v. Dr. Lowell Fisher, D.O., et al.
services have been rendered, we will charge a fair fee for what we have provided.
You must be satisfied with our services or you do not owe a fee.
that we expect others to follow.
of satisfaction with our services.
great part depends upon each member's satisfaction with his or her job.
take care of our whole life, at work and elsewhere.
1. We commit to provide you our services on the most efficient and predictable basis possible.
for complex and commercial litigation cases can range substantially higher.
work as detailed under "Hourly Rates"
commercial litigation rates can range to $450 an hour.
5. Travel expenses are incurred at the most economical, yet refundable rates.
involve a more substantial retainer.
REPRESENTATION: Smith Economics Group, Ltd. (SEG), through its principal consultant, Stan V.
with your clients. We are pleased to work within your time and budget limitations.
we cover a broad diversity of business and events in commercial and personal injury litigation.
ENGAGEMENT: We serve law firms under written agreement on matters specifically designated.
related matter, whether or not involving the same client of the law firm, without our prior consent.
testimony, and any additional work as detailed under "Hourly Rates" below.
hourly basis which can range up to $450 per hour.
economists, complex commercial litigation analysis, travel time and other work is also billed at this rate.
minute increments (one-tenth of an hour).
There shall be no charges for personnel other than Stan V. Smith unless mutually agreed to in advance.
to update your fee schedule to reflect new rates than charged to those entering into new engagements.
factors into consideration that, a reduction in charges is fair and appropriate for the service rendered.
testimony or the outcome of the case.
Further, our fees are not contingent upon any rulings regarding the admissibility of testimony.
CLIENTS OR THE OUTCOME OF THE CASE.
ninety days following the statement date.
terminate for cause at any time work on your behalf.

References: v. 
 v. 
 V. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V.

 V.