Source: https://oge.gov/web/oge.nsf/All%20Advisories%20by%20Year?OpenView&RestrictToCategory=1982
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 03:15:30+00:00

Document:
18 U.S.C. § 207 does not prohibit a former Commissioner from being hired by a Federal judge as a special representative on a matter in which he had participated personally and substantially under the exception for acting on behalf of the United States. The Commissioner may have independent contractor status under 18 U.S.C. §§ 203 and 205.
18 U.S.C. §§ 203 and 205 does not prohibit a government employee from working for a consulting firm on a contract with another agency if the employee did not represent the firm before the agency and payment for his services was not contingent on the firm’s contract.
Outside Earned Income under 5 U.S.C. app. § 210 includes income from the sale or other disposition of, transfer of an interest in, or licensing of the use of an intellectual property such as a manuscript by the official who created the property.
18 U.S.C. § 207(a) prohibits a former government attorney from representing his law firm in negotiations with an agency concerning the agency’s wish to hire the firm as outside counsel in a matter in which the attorney had personally and substantially participated. Once the firm was hired, the attorney could provide legal services for the agency.
A private corporation may, without violating 18 U.S.C. § 209, pay certain expenses incident to one of its employee’s move to Washington DC in part to participate in the one-year Presidential Executive Exchange Program because the move was determined to be an intra-company move and the payments were made pursuant to a bona fide employee benefit plan.
A former federal attorney is barred by 18 U.S.C. § 207(a) from representing a state before a federal agency or employee in the state’s prosecution of an individual where the attorney participated personally and substantially in the federal prosecution of the same individual for the same activities.
A retired military officer who is now employed in the executive branch is not required to disclose his military retirement income. Such retirement income is considered “reduced compensation for reduced current services” and falls within the parenthetical exception in 5 U.S.C. app. § 202(a)(1)(A).
OGE discusses (1) the background of the conflict-of-interest statutes, particularly 18 U.S.C. § 202(a); (2) the characteristics of advisory committee members who are SGEs, as distinguished from those who remain in private roles; and (3) the principles enunciated by the Federal Personnel Manual to the members of present or former advisory committees.
To take advantage of the exception to 18 U.S.C. § 207 for representing Indian tribes, a former employee must notify the governmental body before which he wishes to appear that the matter involved in the appearance was one in which he personally and substantially participated as a government employee.
18 U.S.C. § 207 restrictions apply only to employees of entities within the executive branch as those terms are defined by 18 U.S.C. § 6 and 5 C.F.R. § 737.3(a)(2). The Government Printing Office does not fall within those definitions and has long been recognized as part of the legislative branch.
An honorarium paid to a charitable organization on a government employee’s behalf must be counted as outside income to the employee for purposes of 5 U.S.C. app § 210.
OGE advised that if an employee accepted a transfer to World Bank, that the employee could act on behalf of the Bank on any matter pursuant to the exceptions to 18 U.S.C. § 207 as the exception runs to employees of a public international organization on assignment from an agency.
An executor’s fee and a trustee’s fee “brought about” by services performed in such capacities while serving in the Government, must be considered as outside earned income for purposes of the limitations set forth in 5 U.S.C. app. § 210. OGE explains how to calculate the amount attributable to the outside earned income limitation.
A former senior employee was not prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 207(b) and (c) from being present in a courtroom or advising defense counsel at defense counsel’s table during proceedings involving a particular matter in which he had not personally participated but which had been under his official responsibility during his last year of government service.
A former government employee who testifies on behalf of a private party in a rate-making proceeding would violate 18 U.S.C. § 207(a) if the proceeding were considered to be of the “same particular matter involving a specific party or parties” as an earlier rate-making proceeding in which the employee had personally and substantially participated.
An agency can, under its regulatory equivalent to 5 C.F.R. § 735.203, prohibit certain outside employment based on the appearance of impropriety that previously subjected the agency to unfavorable criticism and impaired the public’s confidence in the agency. Unless the agency’s judgment was arbitrary or capricious, OGE would not overturn it.
A state's higher education system and/or institutions need not invariably be joined with the rest of the state governmental structure into one "organization" for the purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 208(a).
OGE intended through its regulation in Part 738 of Title 5 of the C.F.R., that each agency have only one designated agency ethics official and only one alternate agency ethics official as required to perform the duties in 5 C.F.R. § 738.203(b)(3). Only the designated agency ethics official is required to file a public financial disclosure report.
A former Government employee who served in the executive branch until 1967 was subject to the post employment restrictions of 18 U.S.C. § 207(a) as read in 1967 and not as amended in 1978 and 1979 where he sought to consult for a subcontractor in a suit arising out of the contracted work with the individual’s former agency.
A letter submitted to an agency by a former government official that simply agreed to an agency assessment and stated that a check was tendered is not a communication submitted with the “intent to influence” as prohibited by 18 U.S.C. § 207(a), even though the former official recommended the assessment while employed by the agency.

References: § 207
 § 210
 § 207
 § 209
 § 207
 § 202
 § 202
 § 207
 § 207
 § 6
 § 737
 § 210
 § 207
 § 210
 § 207
 § 207
 § 735
 § 208
 § 738
 § 207
 § 207