Source: https://www.neustel.com/patent-attorneys/michael-neustel-patent-attorney/
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 06:57:39+00:00

Document:
Michael Neustel is a U.S. Patent Attorney who focuses his patent law practice on patent and trademark applications, infringement due diligence, Inter Partes Review (IPR), patent infringement litigation and trademark infringement litigation. Michael also counsels entrepreneurs and small-businesses on how best to protect their inventions and trademarks.
Sarasota Herald-Tribune (Quoting Neustel.com Website in 8/13/12 Article).
New Products Marketing Corp. d/b/a Stringliner Company v. Empire Level Mfg., Corp., 3:03-cv-00005-RRE-KKK (2003 District of North Dakota) – Represented the North Dakota plaintiff Stringliner in a patent infringement case involving United States Patent No. 5,927,635.
Universal Electronics Inc. v. Intrigue Technologies, Inc., 8:02-cv-01089-GLT-AN (2003 Central District of California) – Represented the Canadian defendant Intrigue Technologies (a.k.a. Harmony Remote) against the publicly traded Universal Electronics in a patent infringement lawsuit involving six patents (U.S. Patent No. 5,959,751, U.S. Patent No. 5,689,353, U.S. Patent No. 5,228,077, U.S. Patent No. 5,255,313, U.S. Patent No. 5,552,917, and U.S. Patent No. 5,414,761). Represented the defendant until they were purchased by Logitech for $29 million and then Quinn Emanuel Urquhart Oliver & Hedges continued the litigation.
C&A Pro, LLC v. Pride Solutions, LLC, 04-cv-03994-JRT-FLN (2004 District of Minnesota) – Represented the North Dakota plaintiff C&A Pro in a patent infringement lawsuit involving seven patents (U.S. Patent No. 6,086,101, U.S. Patent No. 6,331,008, U.S. Patent No. 6,619,676, U.S. Patent No. 6,764,635, U.S. Patent No. D466,832, U.S. Patent No. D480,332, and U.S. Patent No. D485,786).
Spiel Associates, Inc. v. Gateway Bookbinding Systems, LTD, 1:03-cv-04696-FB-RLM (2003 Eastern District of New York) – Represented the Canadian defendant Gateway Bookbinding in a patent infringement lawsuit involving two patents (U.S. Patent No. 6,547,502 and U.S. Patent No. 6,726,426) and unfair competition litigation resulting in summary judgment in favor of my client after over six years of contentious litigation.
University of North Dakota v. James Hardie et al., 2:04-cv-00152-RRE-KKK (2004 District of North Dakota) – Represented UND and the EERC in a contentious lawsuit against the international company James Hardie involving a dispute over patent inventorship, misappropriation of trade secrets, copyright infringement, unfair competition, breach of contract and replevin. The Felhaber Larson Fenlon & Vogt PA law firm got involved to assist UND/EERC with respect to the non-patent matters, but I maintained lead role relating to the patent matters. The Nilles Law Firm was local counsel for James Hardie.
New Products Marketing Corp. d/b/a Stringliner Company v. Lowes Companies, Inc., 4:06-cv-035-DLH-CSM (2006 District of North Dakota) – Represented the North Dakota plaintiff Stringliner in a patent infringement (U.S. Patent No. 5,927,635), trademark infringement and unfair competition lawsuit against the national retailer Lowe’s.
Schlagel, Inc. v. S-M Enterprises, Inc., 0:13-cv-00446-MJD-LIB (2013 District of Minnesota) – Represented defendant S-M Enterprises in a patent infringement lawsuit (U.S. Patent No. 5,593,019).
If you would like to speak with Michael, you can call him at 701-281-8822.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.