Source: https://www.iejme.com/article/personalized-education-strategies
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 14:08:08+00:00

Document:
Reference: Sadovaya VV, Korshunova OV, Nauruzbay ZZ. Personalized Education Strategies. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(1), 199-209.
Reference: Sadovaya, V. V., Korshunova, O. V., & Nauruzbay, Z. Z. (2016). Personalized Education Strategies. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), 199-209.
Reference: Sadovaya, Victoriya V., Olga V. Korshunova, and Zhumagali Zh. Nauruzbay. "Personalized Education Strategies". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 2016 11 no. 1 (2016): 199-209.
Reference: Sadovaya, V. V., Korshunova, O. V., and Nauruzbay, Z. Z. (2016). Personalized Education Strategies. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 11(1), pp. 199-209.
Reference: Sadovaya, Victoriya V. et al. "Personalized Education Strategies". International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, vol. 11, no. 1, 2016, pp. 199-209.
Reference: Sadovaya VV, Korshunova OV, Nauruzbay ZZ. Personalized Education Strategies. Int Elect J Math Ed. 2016;11(1):199-209.
The topicality of the research is connected with the modern socio-cultural situation which requires from an educational institution to create an active, responsible, self-reliant member of the society who can act thoughtfully and rationally in ambiguous situations. It is necessary to develop a new model of educational strategies based on the principles of personification, dialogueness, subjectness, individual approach, and complementarity. The purpose of the article is to describe the methodological base of personalized education and the instructional strategies which are used within this approach. The main approaches to research this issue are learner-centered, culturological, axiological, synergistic, and hermeneutic approaches. The main results of the article are the author's understanding of the strategies of personalized education given through the description of their characteristics and differences from other teaching strategies, and the description of certain strategies of personalized education. The article and the research result described can be used to modernize the educational process in general and higher education organizations, to provide for conditions of subjectness progress and learner-centered approach.
Arsaliev, Sh. M-H. (2013). Methodology of modern ethnopedagogy. Moscow: Helios Arvs.
Bespal’ko, V. P. (2008). Nature-aligned pedagogy. Moscow: Narodnoe obrazovanie.
Bondarevskaya, E.V. (2000). Teoria I Praktika lichnostno-orientirovannogo obrasovania [Theory and practice of learner-centered education]. Rostov-on-Don.: Publishing House of the Rostov State Pedagogical University.
Dautova, O. B. (2010). Changes in training and learning activities of students in the educational process. Saint-Petersburg: Izd-vo "LEMA".
Ghelfman, E. G., Kholodnaya M. A. (2006) Psycodidactics of a school textbook. Inellectual development of students. Saint-Petersburg: Piter.
Keislar, E. R. & Stern С. (1970). Differentiated in straction in problem solving for children of different mental ability levels. J. of Edicat. Psych., 61, 48–54.
Korshunova O. V. & Selivanova O.G. (2014). Problems of Didactics of the rural school: conceptual approaches, models and technologies for learning. Kirov: Izd-vo VGGU.
Korshunova, O. V. (2008). Education in a village school on the basis of integral-differentiated approach. Kirov: Vyatka State University of Humanities.
Korshunova, O. V. (2014). Modular technology with level-style differentiation as an instrumental framework of didactic system of a rural school teacher. Proceedings of Petrozavodsk State University, series: Social Sciences & Humanities, 5 (142), 31-37.
Maslow, A. N. (1954). Motivation and personality. N. Y.
Moskalenko, A.V. (2011). Formation of the subject position of high school students in conditions of pedagogical interaction. Smolensk: Smolensk State University.
Petzold, M. (1985). Kognitiv Stile: Definitionen, Klassifikationen und Relevanz eines psychologischen Konstrukts aus wissaenschafthistorischer Sicht. Psychologie, Erziehung, Unterricht. Bd. 32. S. 161–177.
Taking into account thinking peculiarities when teaching physics (integral-differentiated approach) https://edu.1september.ru/distance/16/005/.
Werner, H. (1957). Comparative psychology of mental development. N. Y.
Yakimanskaya, I. S. (1996). Student-oriented teaching in modern school. Moscow. (Library of journal “Director shkoly [Head of school]”. Special issue 2).

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.