Source: https://www.kenreyeslaw.com/blog/2014/october/prior-marriage-must-be-bona-fide-in-order-to-be-/
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 07:55:06+00:00

Document:
Many aliens that are out of status, but are otherwise eligible to obtain a greencard through a family based or employment based petition, are barred from doing so unless they are grandfathered by INA Section 245(i). To be grandfathered by INA section 245(i), one of the requirements is that you are a beneficiary of a prior immigrant petition filed on or before April 30, 2001 that was approvable. What happens when the prior petition was a marriage based petition which was denied? What happens if the denial was due to failure to prove bona fide marriage? Are you able to use that former petition for purposes of grandfathering under INA §245(i)?
The BIA held in Matter of Jara Riero and Jara Espinol, 24 I. & N. Dec. 267 (B.I.A. August 15, 2007), that an alien seeking to establish eligibility for adjustment of status under INA § 245(i) based on a previous marriage petition must prove that the marriage was bona fide at its inception. This was necessary in order to show that the visa petition was "meritorious in fact" pursuant to 8 CFR § 1245.10(a)(3) (2007).
CFR § 1245.10(a)(3) (2007) defines approvable when filed to mean that as of the date of the filing of the qualifying immigrant visa petition under section 204 or qualifying application for labor certification, the qualifying petition or application was properly filed, meritorious in fact, and non-frivolous. This determination will be made based on the circumstances that existed at the time the qualifying petition or application was filed. A visa petition that was properly filed on or before April 30, 2001, and was approvable when filed, but was later withdrawn, denied, or revoked due to circumstances that have arisen after the time of filing, will preserve the alien beneficiary's grandfathered status if the alien is otherwise eligible to file an application for adjustment of status under section 245(i) of the Act.
The denial, withdrawal, or revocation of the approval of a qualifying immigrant visa petition, or application for labor certification, that was properly filed on or before April 30, 2001, and that was approvable when filed, will not preclude its grandfathered alien (including the grandfathered alien's family members) from seeking adjustment of status under section 245(i) of the Act on the basis of another approved visa petition, a diversity visa, or any other ground for adjustment of status under the Act, as appropriate. 8 CFR § 1245.10(i).
In the Mater or Riero and Espinol, the BIA found that, while there is little case law construing the terms "approvable when filed" or "meritorious in fact," it agreed with the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit inLasprilla v. Ashcroft, 365 F.3d 98 (1st Cir. 2004), that, in order for a visa petition to be "approvable when filed" in this context, there must be a showing that the marriage was bona fide. Moreover, the Board held, in order to be "meritorious in fact," the visa petition must be based on "a genuine marriage in which the parties intended to share a life as husband and wife, not a marriage of convenience designed solely to confer an immigration benefit on one of the parties."
The BIA’s decision was supported by the explanation in the Federal Register which states that a visa petition is not approvable when filed if it "is fraudulent or if the named beneficiary did not have, at the time of filing, the appropriate family relationship or employment relationship that would support the issuance of an immigrant visa." In the marriage context, a "fraudulent" visa petition would include one where the marriage was not entered into in good faith. The respondent bears the burden of proving that the marriage was entered into in good faith.

References: §245
 § 245
 § 1245
 § 1245
 § 1245
 v.