Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/148859914/Ingeniador-v-Yelp
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 23:24:40+00:00

Document:
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. None: Ingeniador, LLC v. Yelp, Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l8CF for more info.
Droplets v. E*Trade Financial et. al.
Choon's Design v. Zenacon et. al.
Signal IP v. Mercedes-Benz et. al.
INGENIADOR, LLC Plaintiff, v. YELP, INC.
PLAINTIFF REQUESTS TRIAL BY JURY PATENT INFRINGEMENT Defendant.
place of business at 1607 Coln St. #101, San Juan, Puerto Rico 00911.
restaurant or other establishment) information services through a network of localized websites. Furthermore, Defendant offers customers the ability to post and share reviews and rate their experiences in the restaurants and other establishments. III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 9. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
1331 and 1338(a) because the action arises under the Patent Laws of the United States, 35 U.S.C. 1 et seq.
Puerto Rico, the causes of action against Defendant are connected (but not limited) to Defendants purposeful acts committed in Puerto Rico, including Defendants making, using, offering for sale, or selling a service that includes a computer-implemented method for ratingbased sorting and displaying of reviews, which include features that fall within the scope of at least one claim of the 127 Patent. 14. Venue lies in this judicial district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391 and 1400(b).
patent. Ingeniador possesses all rights of recovery under the 127 patent, including the exclusive right to recover for past infringement. 17. 18. The 127 patent is valid and enforceable. The 127 patent contains four independent claims and thirteen dependent claims.
example, the first subject at the Website is the first restaurant in a list of restaurants. In the course of doing so, Defendant also makes and/or uses articles sorting computer code, as well as computer systems, to carry out such a function.
5. That Defendant be directed to pay enhanced damages, including Ingeniadors attorneys fees incurred in connection with this lawsuit pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 285; and 6. That Ingeniador have such other and further relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
Gatten et. al. v. Gatten et. al.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.