Source: https://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/2012/05/20/statutes-never-argue-the-second-amendment/
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 04:49:31+00:00

Document:
NEVER ARGUE THE 2ND AMENDMENT, THIS IS A TRAP . . . ALL SECURED RIGHTS STAND ON THEIR OWN, THEY NEED NO DEFENSE!
THERE CAN BE NO SUMMARY INFRINGMENT AGAINST THE RIGHT TO BEAR ARMS IN ANY MANNER . . . THE STATE OF OREGON WILL HOWEVER, AS DO OTHER STATES, CRAFT PRIVATE LEGISLATION AND STATUTES OFFERING THOSE STATUTES FOR ACCEPTANCE IN A MISLEADING MANNER TO DO BUSINESS WITH AND THEREBY CAUSE THE PEOPLE TO IGNORANTLY VOLUNTEER TO BE REGULATED IN COMMERCE TO THE DEROGATION OR EXCLUSION OF THEIR SECURED RIGHTS! THIS ALL GOES TO CONTRACT!
Follow me closely on this deception and how you can determine for yourself that all regulatory legislation addressed to the people that is “defined” to originate in “this state”, is for profit private copyright law and can only be offered for acceptance to participate in and under these statutes. You have the right NOT TO ELECT/ACCEPT to participate under the right and law of Contract which is in fact CHOICE! Contract originates as a natural event and first requires a meeting of the minds . . . to contract or not to contract premised on the nature and consideration of the offer. ORS Chapter 174 Section 174.030 provides for the natural right to prevail . . . see below.
Oregon Statutes – Chapter 174 – Construction of Statutes; General Definitions – Section 174.030 – Construction favoring natural right to prevail. Where a statute is equally susceptible of two interpretations, one in favor of natural right and the other against it, the former [natural right] is to prevail.
Every statute must have an implementing regulation date to have the force and effect of law. The three (3) gun regulation statutes cited below do in fact display those implementing regulation dates HOWEVER! I have highlighted these dates and you will note, that the dates of implementation are contained in “pairs” of [brackets]. In accordance with the rules of style as published within the “Government Printing Office Style Manual” ANY MATERIAL WITHIN “PAIRS” OF BRACKETS IS TO BE OMITTED!
Any rule or regulation not possessing an implementing date has no force or effect of law and cannot be enforced . . . but the statute can be offered for acceptance . . . if you in anyway bring the issue into “controversy”. This is where they mislead the public. At some point the statute is presented to you in some manner should a gun issue come up . . . this is the critical point . . . . YOU DON’T WANT TO “TRAVERSE” OR “JOIN” with that offered statute, either by arguing your 2nd Amendment rights or any issue regarding the offered opportunity to go into controversy. Knowledge of the omitted regulation dates is all you need to know and how these [brackets] apply. Read the Rules of Style below.
Rules of Style to wit: UNITED STATES PRINTING OFFICE STYLE MANUAL 2008 Publication , at Chapter 8, 8.19 — 8.20 Brackets in pairs In Bills, contracts, laws, ect., to indicate matters that is to be omitted.
PRETTY CLEAR . . . THE ENTIRE REGULATORY PROCESS CRAFTED BY THE PRIVATE FOR PROFIT CORPORATE ENTITY KNOWN AS THE DEFACTO “THIS STATE” AND CAN’T INFRINGE A SECURED RIGHT . . .BUT THEY CAN CONTRACT YOU OUT OF THAT RIGHT! SO WHO IS “THIS STATE?”AND JUST WHAT POWER DOES IT REALLY POSSESS?
Note the Brackets in pairs, you don’t have to participate in “this state” either.
“Governments descend to the level of a mere private corporation and take on the characteristics of a mere private citizen. This entity cannot compel performance upon its corporate statute or rules unless it, like any other corporation or person is the holder-in-due course of some contract or commercial agreement between it and the party upon whom the payment and performance are made and thereby, willing to produce said documents and place the same evidence before trying to enforce its demands called statutes.
So the entire legislature works for a for profit foreign corporation as “Statute Merchants” doing business for their corporation under the guise of a legitimate law making body.
Review the three (3) gun regulation statutes below . . . note that none of the three have the force and effect of law to be enforced . . . . that is, unless you accept or elect to argue against the private sector definitions of their regulatory statute and thereby, agree to be regulated in commerce as regard to your causing a controversy and thereby to the derogation of your “Natural” 2nd amendment right to bear arms.
Oregon Statutes – Chapter 166 – Offenses Against Public Order; Firearms and Other Weapons; Racketeering – Section 166.250 – Unlawful possession of firearms.
(E) Was found to be mentally ill and subject to an order under ORS 426.130 that the person be prohibited from purchasing or possessing a firearm as a result of that mental illness.
Oregon Statutes – Chapter 166 – Offenses Against Public Order; Firearms and Other Weapons; Racketeering – Section 166.470 – Limitations and conditions for sales of firearms.
(g) Has been convicted of a misdemeanor involving violence or found guilty, except for insanity under ORS 161.295, of a misdemeanor involving violence within the previous four years. As used in this paragraph, “misdemeanor involving violence” means a misdemeanor described in ORS 163.160, 163.187, 163.190, 163.195 or 166.155 (1)(b).
(2) A person may not sell, deliver or otherwise transfer any firearm that the person knows or reasonably should know is stolen.
(b) The temporary transfer of any firearm to a minor for hunting, target practice or any other lawful purpose.
(4) Violation of this section is a Class A misdemeanor. [Amended by 1989 c.839 §3; 1991 c.67 §40; 1993 c.735 §11; 2001 c.828 §2; 2003 c.577 §7] DATES OMITTED!
You do not allow my copying of, downloading of your valuable info?
Bank of United States v. Planters Bank of Georgia. Article quick and decisive.

References: §3
 §40
 §11
 §2
 §7
 v.