Source: https://regulations.vlex.com/vid/chlorinated-isocyanurates-from-the-746496485
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 22:28:02+00:00

Document:
SUMMARY: On October 24, 2018, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT) entered final judgment sustaining the final results of remand redetermination pursuant to court order by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) pertaining to the antidumping duty (AD) administrative review of chlorinated isocyanurates (chlorinated isos) from the People's Republic of China (China). Commerce is notifying the public that the final judgment in this case is not in harmony with Commerce's final results in the AD review of chlorinated isos from China.
DATES: Applicable November 3, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Carey, AD/CVD Operations, Office VII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-4261.
2015, Commerce published the Final Results and assigned Heze Huayi the separate rate of 53.15 percent from the Seventh Review \3\ consistent with our past practice because both mandatory respondents received zero margins and none of the separate rate companies had its own calculated rate from the segment immediately prior to the instant segment.
\1\ See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 80 FR 4539 (January 28, 2015) and accompanying Issues and Decision Memorandum (Final Results).
\2\ See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2012-2013, 79 FR 43391 (July 25, 2014) (Preliminary Results), and accompanying Decision Memorandum, at 5-6.
\3\ See Chlorinated Isocyanurates from the People's Republic of China; 2011-2012; Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 79 FR 4875, 4876 (January 30, 2014) (Seventh Review).
\5\ 821 F.3d 1345 (Fed. Cir. 2016).
\6\ See Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. v. United States, Ct. No. 15-27, Court Order, Docket #81, Sept. 12, 2018.
\7\ See Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd., v. United States, Defendant's Response to Court Order, Ct. No. 15-27, Docket #82, at 1-2, Sept. 18, 2018.
\8\ See Remand Order at 7.
\9\ See Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to Court Remand, Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. v. United States, Court No. 15-00027, Slip Op. 18-130 (CIT September 28, 2010), dated October 19, 2018 (Final Redetermination).
\10\ See Heze Huayi Chemical Co., Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 18-149, Consolidated Court No. 15-00027 (CIT 2018).
In its decision in Timken,\11\ as clarified by Diamond Sawblades,\12\ the Federal Circuit held that, pursuant to section 516A(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), Commerce must publish a notice of court decision that is not ``in harmony'' with a Commerce determination and must suspend liquidation of entries pending a ``conclusive'' court decision. The CIT's October 24, 2018, judgment constitutes a final decision of that court that is not in harmony with Commerce's Final Results. This notice is published in fulfillment of the publication requirements of Timken. Accordingly, Commerce will continue suspension of liquidation of subject merchandise pending expiration of the period of appeal or, if appealed, pending a final and conclusive court decision.
\11\ See Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d. 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (Timken).
\12\ See Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d. 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (Diamond Sawblades).
Because there is now a final court decision, Commerce is amending the Final Results and assigning Heze Huayi the mandatory respondents' weighted-average zero rate \13\ for the period June 1, 2012, through May 31, 2013. In the event the CIT's ruling is not appealed, or, if appealed, is upheld by a final and conclusive court decision, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate Heze Huayi's appropriate entries without regard to antidumping duties.
\13\ See Remand Order at 7.
Heze Huayi has a superseding cash deposit rate (e.g., from a subsequent administrative review). Therefore, Commerce will not issue revised cash deposit instructions to CBP.
This notice is issued and published in accordance with sections 516A(e)(1), 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.