Source: http://ks.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20180713_0001030.DKS.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 18:12:55+00:00

Document:
On June 27, 2011, the Court sentenced defendant to 240 months in prison based on a binding plea agreement under Rule 11(c)(1)(C), Fed. R. Crim. P. On March 4, 2015, the Court dismissed defendant's motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2). The United States Supreme Court recently held that a defendant who pleads guilty under Rule 11(c)(1)(C) may seek relief under Section 3582(c)(2) so long as the defendant's guideline range was “part of the framework the district court relied on in imposing the sentence or accepting the agreement.” Hughes v. United States, 138 S.Ct. 1765, 1775 (June 4, 2018). This matter is before the Court on defendant's pro se Motion For Sentence Reduction Under Amendment 782 In Light Of The Supreme Court's Ruling In Hughes V. United States (Doc. #974) filed June 11, 2018. For reasons stated below, the Court dismisses defendant's motion for lack of jurisdiction.
Defendant seeks relief under Amendment 782 to the United States Sentencing Guidelines (“U.S.S.G.”), which lowered the base offense levels in the Drug Quantity Table at U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1. Defendant has not shown that Amendment 782 lowered his guideline range. In particular, defendant's base offense level appears to remain at 38 under the amended guidelines because the Court attributed at least 25.2 kilograms of cocaine base to him. See Presentence Investigation Report (Doc. #446) filed June 21, 2011, ¶ 150(a) (first method: multiple people in conspiracy selling one kilogram per month for 37 months), ¶ 150(b) (second method: 277.5 kilograms of cocaine base); ¶ 150(c) (third method: “very conservative estimate” of 78.9 kilograms of cocaine base during span of conspiracy); U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(c)(1) (Nov. 1, 2016 ed.) (base offense level of 38 for at least 25.2 kilograms of cocaine base). Because defendant has not shown that Amendment 782 lowered his guideline range, the Court dismisses his motion to reduce sentence for lack of jurisdiction.IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendant's pro se Motion For Sentence Reduction Under Amendment 782 In Light Of The Supreme Court's Ruling In Hughes V. United States (Doc. #974) filed June 11, 2018 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
 Because the plea agreement called for a specific sentence and did not use or employ a guideline sentencing range, the Court dismissed defendant's motion for lack of jurisdiction. See Order (Doc. #877) filed March 4, 2015 at 1 (citing United States v. Graham, 704 F.3d 1275, 1278 (10th Cir. 2013)).

References: § 3582
 v. 
 V. 
 § 2
 § 2
 V. 
 v.