Source: http://congressionalresearch.com/RL32077/document.php?study=The+Assault+Weapons+Ban+Legal+Challenges+and+Legislative+Issues
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 00:32:00+00:00

Document:
feedi n g d evi ce t hat w as ot herwi s e l aw fully possessed o n t he date of enactment.
that such a firearm would b e u sed for dangerous purposes.
legi slativel y, raising questi o ns regarding t he future scope of federal firearm l aws.
i s current l y sl at ed t o ex pi re.
2 See 18 U.S.C. §922.
firearms in an official capacity, i rrespective of crimi nal r ecord.
Subtitle B, §1111, 116 Stat. 2274, 107 Cong., 2 Sess. (Nov. 25, 2002).
B. Restrictions on Inte rsta te Transfers.
the i nternet s ale contex t.
in the t ransferee’s s tate.
U.S.C. §922(a)(2)(A); §922(3); 27 C.F.R. §178.31.
1618 U.S.C. §922(a)(3); §922(a)(5); §922(b)(3).
the assault weapons ban are slated to ex pire on September 13, 2004.
A. Banned W eapons and Devices.
incarcerated used, carried, or possessed a semi automatic or fully automatic assault weapon.
Special Report, Nove mber, 2001 [http://www.oj p.usdoj .gov/bj s /pub/pdf/fuo.pdf].
similar public places. 18 U.S.C. §922(p).
guns and other automa tic weapons. 26 U.S.C. §§5801-5872.
The Act also imposes restrictions on large capacity ammunition feeding devices .
designed to accept and capable of operating only with .22 caliber rimf ire ammunition.
B. Exempt Weapons and Devices.
C. Treatment of Assault Weapons Under 1 8 U.S.C. §925(d)(3).
manufactured devi ces are r equired t o bear the name, city, and state of t he manufacturer.
28See H.Rept. 103-489 at 20.
of exempted weapons so long as the a ssault weapons ban i s i n e ffect.
features other t h a n t h e ability to accept a detachable, l arge capacity magaz i ne.
ruling t hat t hey were unsuitable for sporting purposes.
m easured consi d erat i on.
P 5300.4(01-00) at 125-25 (2000).
of the M oynihan Bullet Bills,” 20 J our. of Legis. 19, 33 (1994).
indivi duals must refrain in order t o avoid punishment).
applied t o f irearms possessed by defendant).
to bear arms independent of the Second Amendment.”).
prohibitions on manufacture, transfer, and possession.
(E.D. M ich. 2000), affirmed by Olympic Arms v. Buckles, 301 F.3d 384 (6 Cir. 2002).
& Laughlin Steel, 301 U.S. 1, 37 (1937)).
55Id. at 1059 (citing Lopez , 514 U.S. at 580 (K ennedy, J ., concurring)).
56See, e.g., City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center , 473 U.S. 432, 439-40 (1985).
57See, e.g., Heller v . Doe, 509 U.S. 312, 319 (1993).
58301 F.3d 384 (6th Cir. 2002).
59Id. a t 388. See Olympic Arms v. Magaw, 91 F.Supp.2d 1061 (E.D. M ich. 2000).
House, and t wo in the S enate. Senator Diane Feinstein h as forwarded a proposal, S .
provided for in the Act.
Carbonic Gas , 220 U.S. 61 (1911)).
date of the ban’s enactment.
Act, determining t hat i t comports with minimum constitutional requirem e n t s.
regarding t he future scope of federal firearm l aws.
Weapons Ban Reauthorization,” T he Washington T imes, M ay 31, 2003.

References: §922
 §1111
 §922
 §922
 §178
 §922
 §922
 §922
 §922
 §925
 v. 
 v. 
 v.