Source: http://constitutionclub.ning.com/forum/topics/the-irs-and-the-income-tax
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 16:18:08+00:00

Document:
The first two videos are somewhat similar but systematically explain and document the truth. I believe these videos are what we need to share with new and potential students, and non-believers of this Constitutional subject on all fronts. Congressional and legislative conduct exposes and documents how word-play is being implemented against us dumbed-down lowly Serfs. Their actions support our suspicions.
Without changing the subject, I can't help superimpose the subject of our court "jurisdiction".
Your right about that challenge jurisdiction by all means. You also need to know a few other things.
“Anyone entering into an arrangement with the government takes the risk of having accurately ascertained that he who purports to act for the government stays within the bounds of his authority, even though the agent himself may be unaware of the limitations upon his authority.” Federal Crop Insurance v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380 (1947). You have to correct the erroneously allegations against you about your earnings.
They are not taxable but you fail to rebut that.
“In the interpretation of statutes levying taxes it is the established rule not to extend their provisions, by implication, beyond the clear import of the language used, or to enlarge their operations so as to embrace matters not specifically pointed out. In case of doubt they are construed most strongly against the government, and in favor of the citizen.” (cites omitted) Gould v. Gould, 245 US 151 (1971).
law is doubtful, the doubt is to be resolved in favor of those upon whom the tax is sought to be laid.” Spreckles Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain, 192 US 397 (1904).
The federal law is mathematically consistent that only “wages” as defined at IRC §3401(a) and §3121(a) are returnable as earnings from labor under federal law. There is no doubt that unprivileged pay-for-labor not constituting “wages,” as custom defined in the code, is exempt from reporting.
“The taxpayer must be liable for the tax. Tax liability is a condition precedent to the demand. Merely demanding payment, even repeatedly, does not cause liability.” Bothke v. Terry, 713 F.2d 1405, 1414 (1983).
There is plenty to learn but simple once you do a Affidavit of Sovereign Authority.
Rebut your labor as earnings non-wages non-gross income - No Tax Liability.
Let me know if you wish to learn more.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 §3401
 §3121
 v.