Source: http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50k/legal/a7/3414.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 00:57:36+00:00

Document:
Defendant Gerry Armstrong ("Armstrong") submits this separate statement in opposition to Plaintiff Church of Scientology International's ("Scientology") separate statement of undisputed facts with reference to supporting evidence pursuant to CCP Section 437c (b).
1. Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Complaint; Wilson Decl., ¶2, Exhibit A thereto; Wilson Decl., ¶3, Exhibit B thereto, Defendant's Answer, at ¶2:5-7; ¶14:17-22.
“beneficiaries,” and by fraud perpetrated by these “beneficiaries” against him. The quoted excerpt from paragraph 7(D) contains conditions that unlawfully deprive Armstrong of basic, vital rights and privileges secured to him by the U.S. Constitution and laws in violation of 18 U.S.C. §241.
2. Wilson Decl., ¶¶4-5, Exhibits C and D thereto, Complaints filed in Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 152229 and Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 157680; Wilson Decl., ¶3, Exhibit B thereto at ¶¶2:5-7; 2:28-3:1.
2. Undisputed, but irrelevant, except as those “several breach of contract actions” constitute acts in furtherance of crimes against Armstrong, specifically violations of 18 U.S.C. §241.
Armstrong Decl., 2-5, Ex A; Wilson Decl. Exs. A, B.
3. Undisputed, but irrelevant, except that such liquidated damages impermissibly act as intimidation and punishment in violation of 18 U.S.C. §241 and §242, and such seeking of such liquidated damages and injunctive relief against Armstrong, and efforts of any kind to prevent Armstrong from doing any of the things he has done or might do, constitute acts in furtherance of violations of 18 U.S.C. §241 and §242.
Armstrong Decl., ¶¶2-5, Ex A; Wilson Decl. Ex.
Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 152229 and Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 157680; Wilson Decl., 3, Exhibit B thereto at ¶¶2:5-7; 2:28-3:1.
A, B; Complaint Marin No. 152229, Wilson Decl. Ex. C; Complaint Marin No. 157680, Wilson Decl. Ex. D.
The Cross-Complaint in Marin No. 157680 had a single cause of action for abuse of process.
Wilson Decl. ¶6, Ex. A, E.
5. Undisputed but irrelevant, except as such Order of Permanent Injunction is an instrument and act in furtherance of the beneficiaries’ crimes against Armstrong, specifically violations of 18 U.S.C. §241 and §242, and except as such Injunction contains clear misstatements of material fact to Armstrong’s detriment evidencing judicial malfeasance.
voluntarily entered into a Mutual Release of All Claims and Settlement Agreement in December, 1986.
Armstrong Decl., ¶¶2-5, 23, 30, Ex A, K; Wilson Decl. Ex. A, B, F, H-J.
publication, broadcast, writing, filming audio recording, video recording, electronic recording or reproduction of any kind of any book, article, film, television program, radio program, treatment, declaration, screenplay or other literary, artistic or documentary work of any kind which discusses, refers to or mentions Scientology, the Church and/or any of the Beneficiaries (which includes plaintiff herein, CSI); 5. Discussing with anyone, not a member of Armstrong's immediate family or his attorney, Scientology, the Church, and/or any of the Beneficiaries (including CSI.)."
6. Undisputed and irrelevant, except as such Injunction and Judgment are instruments and acts in furtherance of crimes against Armstrong, specifically violations of 18 U.S.C. §241 and §242.
Armstrong Decl., ¶¶2-5, 14, 23, 27, Ex A; Wilson Decl. Ex. A, B, F, G.
International v. Armstrong, Case No. 157680; Answer of Gerry Armstrong Answer, 2:5-7.
7. Thereafter, on or about November 13, 2000, plaintiff applied Ex Parte to the Court in the Consolidated Action for an Order to Show Cause why defendant Armstrong should not be held in contempt for violating the October 17, 1995 Order of Permanent Injunction for engaging in 131 breaches of the October 17, 1995 Injunction.
7. Wilson Decl.9, Exhibit H thereto, Ex Parte Application for Order to Show Cause Re: Contempt and supporting documents thereto.
7. Undisputed and irrelevant, except as such application for an Order to Show Cause why Armstrong should not be held in contempt for doing whatever he did that constituted “engaging in 131 breaches of the October 17, 1995 Injunction” is an instrument and act in furtherance of crimes against Armstrong, specifically violations of18 U.S.C. §241 and §242.
Armstrong Decl., 2-5, 23, 28, 30, Ex A, K; Wilson Decl. Ex. A, B, F, H, I.
8. Wilson Decl., ¶2 and Exhibit A thereto, the Mutual Release of All Claims and Settlement Agreement; Wilson Decl., ¶3, Exhibit B thereto, Defendant's Answer, ¶15:4-5, ¶ 16:8-17, ¶¶27-30:2, ¶35:21-24, ¶ 48:12, 22-26.
8. Undisputed, but irrelevant, except as any efforts to prohibit Armstrong from writing, publishing or otherwise uttering such statements, or to punish him for having written, published or otherwise uttered such statements, constitute acts in furtherance of crimes against Armstrong, specifically violations of 18 U.S.C. §241 and §242. The 131 postings are written publications of Armstrong’s religious beliefs concerning his religious experiences and religious knowledge in exercise of his religious freedom.
Armstrong Decl., 2-5, 26-29, Ex A, K; Wilson Decl. Ex. A, B, F, H, I.
9. Wilson Decl., ¶10 and Exhibit I thereto, Armstrong's Opposition to Order to Show Cause.
9. Disputed in part, and undisputed in part, but irrelevant. Scientology has not provided any evidence to support the conclusion that Armstrong asserted the same arguments he proffered earlier in the Consolidated Action. Armstrong asserted some arguments that were similar, and some that were completely different.
Armstrong Decl., ¶28, Ex. K; Wilson Decl. Ex. I.
Petitioner (CSI) has shown that: (1) During the period of February 20, 1998 to July 10, 2000, ARMSTRONG made a total of 131 postings on the Internet, each of which violated one or more provisions of the Injunction ... ARMSTRONG did not deny these violations. In his January 9, 2001 declaration under penalty of perjury, ARMSTRONG stated, "I have violated Scientology's Injunction thousands of times since former Marin County Superior.
Court Judge [Gary Thomas] signed it in October, 1995."
10. Undisputed, but irrelevant, except as such Order of Contempt is an instrument and act in furtherance of crimes against Armstrong, specifically violations of 18 U.S.C. §241 and §242.
Armstrong Decl., ¶¶2-5, 23, 28, 30, Ex A, K; Wilson Decl. Ex. J.
10. Wilson Decl., 11 and Exhibit J thereto, Order of Contempt issued in the Consolidated Action dated July 13, 2001.
11. Undisputed, but irrelevant, except as any efforts to prohibit Armstrong from writing, publishing, uttering or doing any of the things that comprise the 201 breaches of contract alleged in Scientology’s First Cause of Action constitute acts in furtherance of crimes against Armstrong, specifically violations of 18 U.S.C. §241 and §242. All of Armstrong’s actions, writings, publications or other utterances that comprise said alleged 201 breaches of contract are expressions of Armstrong’s religious beliefs concerning his religious experiences and religious knowledge in exercise of his religious freedom.
Armstrong Decl., ¶¶2-5, 26-29, Ex A, B, K; Wilson Decl. Ex. A, B, F, H-J.
Armstrong to sign, Scientology’s lawsuits, summary adjudication and summary judgment motions, injunction, judgment, contempt orders and arrest warrants to enforce the “contract” against Armstrong and Scientology’s extra-judicial Fair Game against Armstrong constitute acts in furtherance of a crime.
Armstrong's Claim: Scientology obtained Armstrong's signature on the subject “contract” by duress.
tricked, sued or lied to or destroyed.
12. Armstrong Decl. ¶7, Ex. A, B, C, F, K.
13. Armstrong Decl. ¶7, Ex. A, B, C, F, K.
years and have acquired a great deal of knowledge of and experience in this field, particularly regarding the Suppressive Person Doctrine and the philosophy, methodologies and application of, and defense to Fair Game.
14. Scientology is extremely wealthy, possessing an estimated billion dollars in liquid assets. It is a global enterprise employing intelligence operators and operatives, private investigator thugs, high powered and low ethics attorneys, and thousands of aggressive mind controlled fanatics to carry out its attacks against people declared Suppressive Persons like Armstrong. Scientology has a history of criminality, publishes policies calling for crimes against people, and trains its personnel to implement and execute those policies.
14. Armstrong Decl. ¶7, Ex. A, B, C, F, K.
15. Armstrong Decl. ¶8, Ex. A, B.
never get reasonable about him. Just go all the way in and obliterate him.
connections and power. He takes over enemy territory. He raids and harrasses.
standard wartime propaganda is what one is doing, complete with atrocity, war crimes trials, the lot.
Know the mores of your public opinion, what they hate. That's the enemy. What they love. That's you.
16. Armstrong studied this policy letter inside Scientology, and is familiar with its implementation inside and outside Scientology. The “enemy” Hubbard refers to and orders be attacked is the class of citizens that Scientology declares to be “Suppressive Persons” or “SPs.” The kinds of attacks on SPs and their lives and livelihoods that Hubbard orders in this policy letter are forms of Fair Game; e.g., waging a war of total attrition on people, expending the maximum of these people, making the war costly on them, cutting off people’s communications, funds and connections, depriving them of political advantages, connections and power, raiding and harassing them, turning public opinion into a frenzy of hate” against them, degrading these people’s image to beast level, and going all the way in and obliterating them. This policy letter is claimed by Scientology to be “religious scripture,” and must be obeyed by Scientology’s members and agents.
16. Armstrong Decl. ¶8, Ex. A, B.
17. Scientology reissued the “Battle Tactics” policy on September 24, 1987.
17. Armstrong Decl. ¶9, Ex. A, B.
18. In 1991 Scientology published a document 18. Armstrong Decl. ¶10, 11, Ex. A, C.
"We must ourselves fight on the basis of total attrition of the enemy. So never get reasonable about him. Just go all the way in and obliterate him."
“Stable datum” is a Scientology term meaning the one datum from which a whole body of knowledge is built, the datum which keeps the entire body of knowledge from falling apart, the datum on which all other things in a subject aligned. Total attrition of Suppressive Persons, never getting reasonable about SPs, and going all the way in and obliterating them, is vital to the “body of knowledge” that is Scientology.
19. Pursuant to Scientology’s Suppressive Person 19. Armstrong Decl. ¶12, Ex. A, D, K.
Doctrine, and in execution of the Fair Game policy, Scientology’s agents have, among other crimes or torts, assaulted Armstrong, run into him bodily with a car, terrorized him on the freeway, threatened to put a bullet between his eyes, staked out his home, framed him with crimes, brought false criminal charges against him, secretly and illegally videotaped him, broke into his car and stole his documents plus irreplaceable artwork, disseminated his confidential psychotherapy records, terrorized him now for twenty-two years, and subjected him to a vicious global black propaganda campaign. Scientology has waged a war of total attrition on Armstrong that continues to this day, and seeks to go all the way in and obliterate him, to expend him, to make Scientology’s war costly on him, to cut off his communications, funds and connections, to deprive him of political advantages and power, and to raid and harass him. Scientology and those persons serving its malevolent purposes have pumped out a river of black propaganda to degrade his image to beast level, and to turn public opinion into a frenzy of hate against him.
20. At the time of the December 1986 “settlement,” Armstrong’s attorney Michael Flynn told him that if he didn’t sign Scientology’s “contract,” Scientology would continue to Fair Game him, Flynn and his family, the other Scientology victims that Flynn represented, and Fair Game anyone else Scientology wanted. Armstrong knew very well what Fair Game was, and understood very well the terrible threat that Scientology was making. The burden on Armstrong was unbearable.
20. Armstrong Decl. ¶13, Ex. A, D, K.
21. Flynn also communicated to Armstrong that if he signed Scientology’s “contract” Scientology promised it would end Fair Game forever against Armstrong, Flynn, his family, clients, and everyone else in the world.
21. Armstrong Decl. ¶14, Ex. A, K.
crimes, threatening him on multiple occasions, filing false criminal charges against him, assaulting him on three occasions, carrying out a massive global black propaganda campaign against him, forging his signature to hate postings to the Internet, spying on him, more secret videotaping of him, terrorizing Armstrong and his friends on the freeway, terrorizing them with a phony bomb threat, obtaining unlawful court orders against Armstrong including the Marin Superior Court’s summary adjudication and summary judgment orders, injunction, judgment, contempt orders, and arrest warrants, and by seeking “judicially” and extra-judicially to deprive him of his rights and privileges secured to him by the U.S. Constitution and laws.
23. Armstrong Decl. ¶15, Ex. A, K.
24. Armstrong Decl. ¶15, Ex. A, K.
25. Unbeknownst to Armstrong at the time of the “settlement,” Flynn entered into a “contract” with Scientology that according to Flynn requires that he not assist Armstrong in any way if Scientology Fair Games him, which Scientology has done.
25. Armstrong Decl. ¶15, Ex. A, K.
26. Armstrong Decl. ¶15, Ex. A, K.
27. Armstrong Decl. ¶18, Ex. A, E, K.
28. At the time of the “settlement,” Scientology was a billion dollar enterprise, whereas Armstrong had no money whatsoever and no bargaining power. Scientology had hundreds of lawyers, whereas Armstrong’s lawyer had been compromised by Scientology to the point that he was pressuring Armstrong on Scientology’s behalf to sign the “contract” to have Fair Game end against Flynn and his family, assuring Armstrong that Scientology would end Fair Game forever if he signed, and also insisting that the liquidated damages condition was not worth the paper it’s printed on.
29. On January 23, 1997 Armstrong was served with a subpoena for production of documents by defendant Grady Ward in the case of Religious Technology Center v. Ward, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. C-96-20207 RMW.
29. Armstrong Decl. ¶21, Ex. G, K.
Armstrong took this letter from Wilson, who did not advise Ward of what was happening, to be a threat and an improper tampering with a subpoenaed witness.
30. Armstrong Decl. ¶21, Ex. H, K.
31. Armstrong wrote a declaration, executed January 26, 1997, and sent it to the U.S. District Court Judge presiding over the Ward case to advise him of the threat from Wilson.
31. Armstrong Decl. ¶21, Ex. I, K.
32. Armstrong left California at the end of January 32. Armstrong Decl. ¶22, Ex. A, J, K.
33. It is obvious to Armstrong that Wilson knowingly used intimidation, threatened and corruptly attempted to persuade him, with intent to influence, delay and prevent his testimony in the official Ward proceeding. Armstrong had a right to report Wilson’s threat by declaration to the Federal Judge presiding over the case in which the threat occurred, and had a duty to report this threat and federal felony, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §4, "Misprision of Felony."
33. Armstrong Decl. ¶22, Ex. A, K.
34. Nowhere in the contempt order that Judge Thomas signed is there any mention of Wilson’s threat letter, which is what caused Armstrong to send his declaration to the judge on the Ward case.
34. Armstrong Decl. ¶23, Ex. A, J, K.
35. After getting Judge Thomas to sign the unlawful contempt order, Scientology then used this order to unlawfully get Armstrong’s appeal from the injunction and judgment of the Marin Superior Court dismissed. Using Judge Thomas’s unlawful contempt order, attorney Wilson insisted, on behalf of Scientology, that Armstrong was not entitled to maintain his appeal because of the fugitive disentitlement doctrine.
35. Armstrong Decl. ¶24, Ex. A, J, K.
Armstrong's Claim: Armstrong has forty-four live, valid Affirmative Defenses that Scientology has not even addressed in its motion.
36. Armstrong pled in his answer to Scientology’s complaint forty-four affirmative defenses.
36. Armstrong Decl. ¶25, Wilson Decl. Ex B.
37. Scientology did not file a demurrer or a motion to strike any of Armstrong’s defenses in this case.
38. Scientology has not provided any evidence in its motion for summary judgment that there is no merit to all or any of Armstrong’s affirmative defenses, has not disposed of any or all of these defenses, or even identified the forty-four affirmative defenses for potential disposal.
Armstrong's Claim: One of Armstrong’s live, valid Affirmative Defenses is freedom of religion.
by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution to the free exercise of religion that permits him to make and have made all of the utterances he has ever made about Scientology or the “beneficiaries.” Armstrong has written about this right to freedom of religion, and necessarily this affirmative defense to Scientology’s complaint, hundreds of times in hundreds of pages in different legal pleadings, declarations and other public statements.
40. The only appearance of the word “religion” or “religious” in Scientology’s motion, separate statement and Wilson declaration, is to identify the plaintiff as a “nonprofit religious corporation.” Any mention of this whole subject and affirmative defense, and any mention of JudgeThomas’s having previously dealt with this subject and defense, is completely missing from Scientology’s moving papers.
41. Armstrong Decl. ¶26, Ex. A, K, Marin Clerk’s Record on Appeal in Appeal No. A075027; Armstrong’s Opening Brief in Appeal No. A075027.
42. Armstrong Decl. ¶27, Ex. A, K, Wilson Ex. A.B, Complaint.
beliefs about a subject and entity that calls itself a religion. Armstrong made all of these listed utterances that comprise his religious expression of his religious beliefs after Judge Thomas gave Scientology its injunction and judgment, and these utterances conveyed and constituted Armstrong’s religious expression of his religious beliefs at the time he made them. Judge Thomas had retired before Armstrong made his religious expressions of his religious beliefs that constitute elements in his affirmative defense of free religious exercise to Scientology’s pending breach of contract claims.
43. Scientology has provided no evidence whatsoever to completely dispose of or even deal with these material facts. Scientology has not shown that Armstrong’s religious expression is not his religious expression, that his religious beliefs are not religious beliefs, and that Scientology is not a religion.
44. Armstrong Decl. ¶27, Ex. A.
Scientology has no lawful way to defeat or even deal with the defense of religion, because any effort to defeat the defense of freedom of religion, given all that has happened between Scientology and Armstrong in the past twenty-two years, and what has happened in this Court in the litigations between Scientology and Armstrong in the past twelve years, constitutes another criminal act in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 241.
45. Armstrong is a Christian, Scientology is antichristian, and Armstrong has a ministry that involves defending Christianity and Christians from Scientology predations and fraud.
45. Armstrong Decl. ¶28, Ex. A.
46. Armstrong is a Prophet to Scientologists who brings them God’s Word as directed.
46. Armstrong Decl. ¶28, Ex. A.
47. Armstrong is the founder and head of the Church of Wogs (CoW) ® which is a global faith dedicated to protecting wogs from Scientology defamation and persecution. “Wogs” is the term Scientologists use for non-Scientologists, and is a racial epithet both inside and outside Scientology equivalent to “niggers.” Armstrong is a wog. His utterances about Scientology and wogs constitute religious scripture.
47. Armstrong Decl. ¶28, Ex. A.
48. Armstrong Decl. ¶29, Ex. A, K.
their agents. It is clear to Armstrong that to prevent him, an SP, from assisting his own people and class against being beastified, attacked, menaced and obliterated by Scientology is no different from preventing a Jew from assisting his own people and class, the Jews, against being beastified, attacked, menaced and obliterated by, e.g., a Nazi cult. Seeking to prevent Armstrong, by “contract,” threat and punishment from such assistance to or association with his fellow Suppressive Persons is a clearly unlawful purpose and an obvious violation of 18 U.S.C. §241. Judge Thomas’s abetment of Scientology’s efforts to prevent Armstrong from assisting or associating with his own people and class against being beastified, attacked, menaced and obliterated constitutes an obvious violation of 18 U.S.C. §242.
Armstrong's Claim: The “contract’s” conditions that Scientology seeks to enforce are impossible to perform.
49. Armstrong Decl. ¶29, Ex. A-D, K, L.
off Armstrong’s communications, funds and connections, to deprive him of advantages and power, to raid and harass him, and to obliterate him, and to cut off his potential employer’s communications, funds and connections, to deprive his employer of advantages and power, to raid and harass his employer, and to obliterate his employer.
50. Armstrong has a legal duty therefore to disclose his knowledge of Scientology, his experiences, his beliefs and anything else that would explain what the threat Scientology is and would be to any potential employer. Even to get welfare, Armstrong must send out his resume to all sorts of companies disclosing his knowledge of the threat to them that Scientology would be if any person or company hired him.
50. Armstrong Decl. ¶29, Ex. A, L.
Armstrong's Claim: Scientology’s “contract,” duress and fraud to get Armstrong to sign, Scientology’s lawsuits, summary adjudication and summary judgment motions, injunction, judgment, contempt orders and arrest warrants to enforce the “contract” against Armstrong and Scientology’s extra-judicial Fair Game against Armstrong constitute acts in furtherance of a crime.
51. Armstrong Decl. ¶2, Ex. A, Wilson Decl. Ex. A.
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;... They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
52. Armstrong Decl. ¶3 Ex. A, K, Wilson Decl. Ex. A.
including judicially using the Marin Superior Court, are unlawful acts in furtherance of said criminal conspiracy.
53. Armstrong Decl. ¶4 Ex. A, K, Wilson Decl. Ex. A, Court record in Marin Superior Court Case Nos. 152229 and 157680.
54. The rights and privileges secured to 54. Armstrong Decl. ¶5, Ex. A, K.
Armstrong by the U.S. Constitution and laws, which the Scientology beneficiaries, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §241, have conspired to injure, oppress, threaten, and intimidate him in the free exercise or enjoyment of, and the rights and privileges which Judge Thomas deprived Armstrong of, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §242, include, but are not limited to: right to the free exercise of religion; right to freedom from slavery; right to freedom of speech; right to self-defense; right to freedom of association; right to due process; right to communicate with or petition government agencies; right to report crimes; litigant’s privilege; doctor-patient privilege; clergyman-penitent privilege.

References: §241
 v. 
 v. 
 §241
 §241
 §242
 §241
 §242
 v. 
 v. 
 §241
 §242
 §241
 §242
 v. 
 §241
 §242
 §241
 §242
 §241
 §242
 §241
 §242
 v. 
 §4
 § 241
 §241
 §242
 §241
 §242