Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Law-Real-Estate-Brokers/Interpleader-Part-4.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 12:34:30+00:00

Document:
Where two brokers claim commission on the same sale to the same purchaser, and one of them sues the vendor for the commission in a court without jurisdiction to accord the right of interpleader, the vendor may bring an action of interpleader in a court having such jurisdiction as, for example, in New York where such action of interpleader may be brought in the Supreme Court.19 This applies, of course, only in those states where interpleader in broker's actions is allowed.
19 Dardonville v. Smith, 133 App. Div. 234 (N. Y. 1909).
20 Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. Hamilton, 70 Atl. 677 (N. J. 1908), (citing Blair v. Porter, 13 N. J. Eq. 267; Fitch v. Brower, 42 N. J. Eq. 300; 11 Atl. 330; Atkinson v. Manks, 1 Cow. (N. Y.) 691; Crane v. McDonald, 118 N. Y. 648; 23 N. E. 991).
21 Crane v. McDonald, 118 N. Y. 648 (1889) contains a discussion of the subject.
22 Vandewater v. Mut. Reserve L. Ins. Co., 44 Misc. 316 (N. Y. 1904). See also Clark v. Mosher, 107 N. Y. 118 (1887) ; Windecker v. Mut. Life Ins. Co., 12 App. Div. 73 (N. Y. 1896). As to Interpleader proceedings In actions in the City Court of New York, making actions at law equitable actions, see Schreiber v. Dry Dock Sav. Inst., 59 Misc. 408 (N. Y. 1908).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.