Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Law-Real-Estate-Brokers/What-Constitutes-Fraud-Acts-Not-Usually-Considered-Fraudulent-Part-4.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 21:55:16+00:00

Document:
16 Crompton v. Beedle, 75 Atl. 334, 335 (Vt. 1910).
17 Kley v. Healy, 149 N. Y. 351, 352 (1891); Chambers v. Mitchell, 123 111. App. 697, 598 (1905).
18 Kreshover v. Berger, 135 App. Div. 27 (N. Y. 1909). 19 Sparman v. Kelm. 83 N. Y. 245 (1880). 20 Kley v. Healy, 127 N. Y. 561 (1891).
We have seen that generally there can be no fraud predicated upon expressions of hope, or expectation, and so there can generally be no fraud based upon expressions of value, for an expression of value is nothing more than an opinion.22 In one man's opinion the value of a piece of land may be far different than in another's.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.