Source: https://www.robinskaplan.com/resources/newsletters/sdny/sdny-patent-litigation-update-january-2014/significant-decisions-in-december-2013
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 16:53:22+00:00

Document:
JDS Therapeutics, LLC. v. Pfizer Inc. et al.
Claim construction for six dietary chromium patents issued by Judge Rakoff.
Adrea, LLC. v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al.
Following in camera review of documents in a discovery dispute, Judge Rakoff refused to order their production.
Claim construction for three e-reader patents issued by Judge Rakoff.
Larry Cole v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. et al.
Patent case found not suitable for Pilot Project for Complex Cases by Judge Rakoff.
Astrazeneca AB et al. v. Apotex Corporation et al.
Patentee awarded over $76 million in damages, which amounted to 50% of infringer’s profit from sale of generic Prilosec®, by Judge Cote.
Request to redact portions of opinion and order denied by Judge Cote.
Capital Dynanmics AG et al. v. Cambridge Associates, LLC.
Patent case removed from Pilot Project Regarding Case Management Techniques for Complex Civil Cases by Judge Forrest.
Nikon Corporation and Nikon Inc. v. Sakar International, Inc.
Preliminary injunction order on consent of the parties ordered by Judge Scheindlin.
The Echo Design Group, Inc. v. Lulu Guinness USA, Inc.
Sur-reply regarding inequitable conduct not allowed by Judge Swain.
Enzo Biochem, Inc. et al v. Molecular Probes, Inc.
Molecular Probes wins summary judgment of no infringement from Judge Sullivan.
Enzo Biochem’s patent infringement claim against Roche survives summary judgment, while remaining claims do not, by Judge Sullivan.
Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. Impax Laboratories, Inc.
Consent judgment in Oxycodone matter entered.
Astrazeneca AB, et al. v. Apotex Corporation, et al.
$104M final judgment for omeprazole infringement ordered by Judge Cote.
Purdue Pharma L.P. et al. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. et al.
The deposition of witnesses who were previously deposed on different OxyContin patents against different defendants was authorized by Judge Stein.
Astrazeneca AB et al. v. Apotex Corporation, et al.
$104M judgment entered in AstraZeneca’s favor in omeprazole case by Judge Cote.
Tomita Technologies USA, LLC. et al. v. Nintendo Co., Ltd et al.
Ongoing royalty rate set higher for Nintendo’s infringing sales than the rate set for pre-trial infringement by Judge Rakoff.
Dr. Paula Small v. Implant Direct MFG. LLC d/b/a Implant Direct, LLC.
Dental implant claims invalid and not infringed, Judge Buchwald found.
Order Regarding Ediscovery In Patent Cases issued by Judge Swain.
Yama Capital LLC v. Canon Inc., et al.
Infringement contentions stricken, with leave to amend, by Judge Failla.
Claim terms construed by Judge McMahon, and claim 9 ruled indefinite.
Sur-reply not permitted by scheduling order is not allowed, said Judge Roman.
Wireless Ink Corporation v. Facebook, Inc. and Google, Inc.
Victorious Google and Facebook fail to win attorney fees from Wireless Ink Corp.
Apotex authorized to deposit $104M in court’s registry before its appeal of AstraZeneca’s omeprazole victory.
Briese Lichttenchink Vertriebs GmbH et al. v. Brent Langton, B2Pro et al.
Treble damages awarded to former business partner after relationship went sour by Judge Swain.
Covenant not to sue divests court of jurisdiction of bankrupt plaintiff’s case, finds Judge McMahon.
Hon Hai Precision Co. v. Wi-Lan, Inc.
Hon Hai Precision Co. v. Wi-Lan Inc. case closed by Judge Maas.
Tomita Technologies USA, LLC. et al. v. Nintendo CO., Ltd. et al.
Judge Rakoff entered an amended judgment, setting an ongoing royalty rate.
Court’s explanation of refusal to strike expert reports.
Cognex Corporation et al. v. Microscan Systems, Inc. et al.
Bar code reader patent case summary judgment motions decided by Judge Rakoff.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.