Source: http://www.myfaircredit.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=233&p=5449
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 17:00:40+00:00

Document:
appeal dismissed, No. 12-30447 (5th Cir. July 3, 2012); see also, e.g., Caillet v. Regions Fin.
Davis v. Wells Fargo Bank, Case 5:13-cv-02517-SMH-KLH, USDC W.D. La.
which are regulated by other authorities as to unfair or deceptive trade practices." First Financial Bank, FSB v.
Butler, 492 So.2d 503, 506 (La. App. 5 Cir. 1986).
such, Wells Fargo is exempt from application of the LUTPA under the explicit text of La. Rev.
exempt from application of the LUTPA.") (citing Fitch v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 709 F. Supp.
here, requiring that Plaintiffs' claims against Wells Fargo under the LUTPA be dismissed."
As argued by Wells Fargo Bank in its motion to dismiss.
Fargo Bank, N.A., 709 F. Supp. 2d 510, 517 (E.D. La. 2010); Hayes v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Civ. No.
WL 1736821 at *3 (W.D. La. April 11, 2008) (holing plaintiff failed to state a claim against Chase Bank USA, N.A.
under the LUTPA, inasmuch as Chase is a federally regulated and insured financial institution); Bank One, N.A. v.
So. 2d 503, 506 (La. App. 5 Cir. 6/2/1986) (noting that nationally chartered bank is exempt from LUTPA).
1256 n.7 (10th Cir. 2006); Laborer's Pension Fund v. Blackmore Sewer Constr., Inc., 298 F.3d 600, 607 (7th Cir.
2002) (taking judicial notice of information on FDIC website); Davis v. Bayless, 70 F.3d 367, 372 n.3 (5th Cir.
1343 n.6 (5th Cir. 1994); Liu v. U.S., 93 Fed. Cl. 184, 191 n.7 (Fed. Cl. 2010).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.