Source: http://www.azattorneymag-digital.com/azattorneymag/201606/?pg=23
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 12:45:22+00:00

Document:
5. Miranda also confessed to and was later convicted of an unrelated robbery. The Arizona Supreme Court also affirmed that conviction. State v. Miranda, 401 P.2d 701 (Ariz. 1965). However, that case was not brought to the U.S. Supreme Court. It therefore is not discussed here. For such discussion, see Paul G. Ulrich, Miranda v. Arizona: History, Memories, and Perspectives, 7 PHOENIX L. REV. 201, 229-30, 257-58 (2013).
6. LUCAS A. POWE, JR., THE WARREN COURT AND AMERICAN POLITICS 394 (2000).
9. DAVID S. TANENHAUS, THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CHILDREN: IN RE GAULT AND JUVENILE JUSTICE 105 (2011).
11. PETER IRONS & STEPHANIE GUITTON, MAY IT PLEASE THE COURT 376 (1993).
12. POWE, supra note 6, at 400, 410.
14. Miranda, 384 U.S. at 470.
15. Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471 (1963).
16. LIVA BAKER, MIRANDA: CRIME, LAW AND POLITICS 193 (1983).
18. Judge Wren Dies; Tied to Miranda Case, ARIZ. REPUBLIC, Sept. 2, 1982, at A10.
19. Id. at A13; Peter D. Baird, Miranda Memories, EXPERIENCE, Summer 1982, at 4-5.
20. BAKER, supra note 16 at 192.
22. Appellant’s Opening Brief 1-2, State v. Miranda, Ariz. Sup. Ct. No. 1802 (filed Oct. 1967).
23. BAKER, supra note 16 at 192.
26. The “beyond a reasonable doubt” burden of proof was required by Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18 (1967).
27. State v. Miranda, 450 P.2d 364 (Ariz. 1969).
31. Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. at 485.
32. Petition for certiorari, Miranda v. Arizona (No. 2176, Oct.
33. BAKER, supra note 16 at 381.
36. GARY STUART, MIRANDA: THE STORY OF AMERICA’S RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT 95 (2004).
40. Johnson v. New Jersey, 384 U.S. 719, 731, 733 (1966).
42. Jenkins v. Delaware, 395 U.S. 213 (1969).
43. Berkemer v. McCarty, 468 U.S. 420, 433-34 (1984).
44. In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1, 13, 28 (1967).
45. Harris v. New York, 401 U.S. 222, 226 (1971).
46. Id. at 232 (Brennan, J., dissenting).
47. Orozco v. Texas, 394 U.S. 324, 327 (1969).
48. Stansbury v. California, 511 U.S. 318, 324 (1994) (per curiam).
49. Beckwith v. United States, 425 U.S. 341, 348 (1968).
50. Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420, 430-31 (1984).
51. Garner v. United States, 424 U.S. 648, 665 (1970).
52. Miranda, 436 U.S. at 475.
53. North Carolina v. Butler, 441 U.S. 369, 373 (1979).
54. Colorado v. Connelly, 479 U.S. 157 (1986).
55. Id. at 169, citing Lego v.
392 U.S. 219 (1968) (Fifth Amendment); United States v.
Wade, 388 U.S. 218 (1967) (Sixth Amendment).
58. United States v. Bayer, 331 U.S. 532, 540 (1947).
59. United States v. Quarles, 467 U.S. 649, 654 (1984).
62. Oregon v. Elstad, 470 U.S. 298, 306-07 (1985).
66. Id. at 349 (Brennan, J., dissenting).
67. Id. at 371 (Stevens, J., dissenting).
530 U.S. 428, 431 (2000). 70. Id. at 439 n. 4.
71. 18 U.S.C. § 3501.
72. Dickerson, 530 U.S. at 437. 73. Id. at 432.
76. Chavez v. Martinez, 538 U.S. 760 (2003).
77. United States v. Patane, 542 U.S. 630, 643 (2004).
79. Berghuis v. Thompkins, 130 S. Ct. 2250, 2259 (2010).
80. Id. at 2278 (Sotomayor, J., dissenting).
81. Robert L. Gottsfield, Is Miranda Still With Us? ARIZ. ATT’Y, Dec. 2006, at 12, 18 (footnotes omitted).
concerning its requirements and limitations.
Despite this, Miranda remains a symbolic victory of great general importance. To the extent police interrogation practices have improved, and more professional procedures have been followed, it has had continuing value.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 3501
 v. 
 v. 
 v.