Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Sec-200-Contribution-as-between-cotenants.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 13:43:43+00:00

Document:
228 it is assumed that if a cotenant has the privilege of cutting timber, he may confer that privilege on another. And it is so decided in Buchanan v. Jencks, 38 R. I. 443, 96 Atl. 307.
74. See Murray v. Haverty, 70 111. 318; Zeigler v. Brenneman, 237 111. 15, 86 N. E. 597.
(Pa.) 238, 27 Am. Dec. 353; Thurston v. Dickinson, 2 Rich. Eq. (S. C.) 317, 46 Am. Dec. 56; Du-plesse v. Haskell, 89 Vt. 166, 94 Atl. 503; Ward v. Ward's Heirs 40 W. Va. 611, 29 L. R. A. 449, 52 Am. St. Rep. 911, 21 S. E. 746; Henrikson v. Henrikson, 143 Wis. 314, 127 N. W. 962.
That he cannot assert such a claim as against a claim for rents and profits, see Geisendorff v. Cobbs, 47 Ind. App. 573, 94 N. E. 236.
76. Baird v. Jackson, 98 111. 78; Hogan v. McMahon, 115 Md 195, Ann. Cas. 1912C, 1260, 80 Atl. 695; Prentice v. Janssen, 79 N. Y. 478; Kidder v. Rixford, 16 Vt. 169, 42 Am. Dec. 504; Reed v. Jones, 8 Wis. 421.
77. Baird v. Jackson, 98 111 78; Prentice v. Janssen, 79 N. Y. 478; See Story, Eq. Jur., Sec.Sec. 1234 1236, 1237.
78. Donnor v. Quartermas, 90 Ala. 164, 24 Am. St. Rep. 778, 8 So. 715;; Drennen's Adm'r v. Walker, 21 Ark. 539; Smith v. Smith, 133 Ga. 170, 65 S. E. 414; Louvalle v. Menard, 6 111. 39, 41 Am. Dec. 161; Nelson's Heirs v. Clay's Heirs, 7 J. J. Marsh (Ky.) 138, 23 Am. Dec. 387; Crafts v. Crafts, 16 Gray (Mass.), 360; Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co., 135 Minn. 134, 160 N. W. 496; Warner v. Eaton, - N. H. -, 102 Atl. 535; Hall v. Pid-dock, 21 N. J. Eq. 311; Cosgriff v. Foss, 152 N. Y. 104, 36 L. R. A. 753, 57 Am. Rep. 500, 46 N. E. 307; Kelsey's Appeal, 113 Pa., 119, 57 Am. Rep. 444, 5 Atl. 447; Robinson v. McDonald, 11 Tex. 385, 62 Am. Dec. 480; Leake v. Hayes, 13 Wash. 213, 52 Am. St. Rep. 34, 43 Pac. 48; Hamlin v. Hamlin, 90 Wash. 467, 156 Pac. 393; Ward v. Ward's Heirs, 40 W. Va. 611, 29 L. R. A. 449, 52 Am. St. Rep. 911, 21 S. E. 746; Contra, Husband v. Aldrich, 135 Mass. 317.
79. Ferris v. Montgomery Land & Imp. Co., 94 Ala. 557, 33 Am. St. Rep. 146, 10 So. 607; Swift v. Swift, 121 Ark. 197, 180 S. W. 742; Helmken v. Meyer, 138 Ga.
457, 75 S. E. 586; Martindale v. Alexander, 26 Ind. 105, 89 Am. Dec. 458; Killmer v. Wuchner, 79 Iowa 722. 8 L. R. A. 289, 18 Am. St. Rep. 392, 45 N. W. 299; Fenton v. Miller, 116 Mich. 45, 72 Am. St. Rep. 502, 74 N. W. 384; Hunt v. Meeker County Abstract & Loan Co., 135 Minn. 134, 160 N. W. 496; Grogan v. Grogan (Mo.), 177 S. W. 649; Carson v. Broady, 56 Neb. 648, 71 Am. St. Rep. 691: Abbott v. Abbott, - N. H. -, 97 Atl. 976 (cotenant induced to improve); Hall v. Piddock, 21 N. J. Eq. 311; Keneaster v. Erb, 83 N. J. Eq. 625, 92 Atl. 377; Ford v. Knapp, 102 N. Y. 135, 55 Am. Rep. 782, 6 N. E. 283; Johnson v. Pelot. 24 S. C. 255, 58 Am. Rep. 253; Turner v. Poole, 102 S. C. 465,. 86 S. E. 956; Burns v. Parker (Tex.), 137 S. W. 705; Leake v. Hayes, 13 Wash. 213, 52 Am. St. Rep. 34, 43 Pac. 48: Ward v. Ward's Heirs, 40 W. Va. 6ll, 29 L. R. A. 449, 52 Am. St. Rep. 911. 21 S. E. 746, and nois; Stewart v. Ste wart, 90 Wis. 516, 48 Am. St. Rep. 949, 63 N. W. 886. But, that this will not be done unless special equities exist in favor of the co-tenant making the improvements, see Cosgriff v. Foss, 152 N. Y. 104.
26 L. R. A. 753, 57 Am. St. Rep. 500, 46 N. E. 307; Nelson's Heirs v. Clay's Heirs, 7 T. J. Marshall (Ky.) 139, cited 11 Columbia Law Rev. at p. 690. Compare Lyons National Bank v. Shuler, 199 N. Y. 405, 92 N. E. 800, questioned 11 Columbia Law Rev. at p. 85.
80. Freeman, Cotenancy, Sec. 258; Hannah v. Carver, 121 Ind. 278, 23 N. E. 93; Van Ormer v. Har-ley, 102 Iowa 150, 71 N. W. 241: Nelson's Heirs v. Clay's Heirs, 7 J. J. Marsh (Ky.), 138, 23 Am. Dec. 387; Worthington v. Hiss, 70 Md. 172, 16 Atl. 534, 17 Atl. 1026; Ford v. Knapp, 102 N. Y. 135, 55 Am. Rep. 782, 6 N. E. 283; Annely v. De Saussure, 26 S. C 497, 4 Am. St. Rep. 725, 2 S. E. 490; Cain v. Cain, 53 S. C. 350, 69 Am. St. Rep. 863, 31 S. E. 278; Leake v. Hayes, 13 Wash. 213, 52 Am. St. Rep. 34, 43 Pac. 48; Early v. Friend, 16 Gratt. (Va.) 21, 78 Am. Dec. 649. See Wolfe v. Childs, 42 Colo. 121, 94 Pac. 292.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.