Source: http://rychlicki.net/en/2010/07/11/5322/
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 03:14:17+00:00

Document:
A former entrepreneur (natural person) requested a telecommunications company to remove his personal data that were used for marketing purposes. The company did not want to take into account the above-mentioned demands, arguing that the rights provided in Article 33 of the Polish Act of 29 August 1997 on the Protection of Personal Data – PPD – (in Polish: Ustawa o ochronie danych osobowych), unified text published in Journal of Laws (Dziennik Ustaw) of 6 July 2002, No. 101, item 926, with subsequent amendments, are not afforded for persons who perform or performed professional business activity (entrepreneurs).
2. At the request of the data subject, the information referred to in paragraph 1 shall be given in writing.
The Supreme Administrative Court in its judgment of 15 March 2010 case file I OSK 756/09 held that provisions of Article 6 of the PPD does not differentiate the rights of individuals, depending on whether they are performing business activity or not. In this situation, there was no reason to exclude information about natural persons conducting business/economic activity from the protection guaranteed by the PPD.
1. Within the meaning of the Act personal data shall mean any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person.
Categories: Art. 12(2) PPD | Art. 145 PBAC | Art. 184 PBAC | Art. 22 PPD | Art. 33 PPD | Art. 6 PPD | personal data | Polish Act on Proceedings Before Administrative Courts | Polish Act on Protection of Personal Data | Polish Supreme Administrative Court.

References: Art. 12
 Art. 145
 Art. 184
 Art. 22
 Art. 33
 Art. 6