Source: http://impresospopulares.colsan.edu.mx/index.php/read/the-principle-of-legality-in-international-and-comparative-criminal-law
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 22:22:05+00:00

Document:
This publication constitutes the completely refereed post-conference court cases of the first foreign convention on Swarm Intelligence established Optimization, ICSIBO 2014, held in Mulhouse, France, in may possibly 2014. The 20 complete papers offered have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from forty eight submissions. subject matters of curiosity offered and mentioned within the convention makes a speciality of the theoretical growth of swarm intelligence metaheuristics and their purposes in components similar to: theoretical advances of swarm intelligence metaheuristics, combinatorial, discrete, binary, restricted, multi-objective, multi-modal, dynamic, noisy, and large-scale optimization, man made immune platforms, particle swarms, ant colony, bacterial foraging, synthetic bees, fireflies set of rules, hybridization of algorithms, parallel/distributed computing, computer studying, information mining, info clustering, choice making and multi-agent platforms in line with swarm intelligence ideas, variation and functions of swarm intelligence ideas to genuine global difficulties in quite a few domain names.
The 2 quantity set LNCS 10072 and LNCS 10073 constitutes the refereed complaints of the twelfth foreign Symposium on visible Computing, ISVC 2016, held in Las Vegas, NV, united states in December 2016. The 102 revised complete papers and 34 poster papers provided during this publication have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from 220 submissions.
46 Castillo Petruzzi, Judgement, ¶ 121, quoted in 2 Jean-Marie Henckaerts & Louise Doswald-Beck, Customary International Humanitarian Law (Practice) ¶ 3714, p. 2500 (Cambridge Univ. Press 2005) (study published by the International Committee of the Red Cross). 47 Bruce Broomhall, Article 22: Nullum crimen sine lege, in Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: Observers’ Notes, Article by Article ¶ 9, pp. , Nomos-Verlagsgesellschaft, 1999) (hereinafter Observers’ Notes).
S. Const. art. I, §§9–10. 10 See generally Prosecutor v. Kanyabashi, Decision on Defence Motion for Jurisdiction, Case No. ICTR-96-15-T, ¶¶ 30–32 (ICTR Tr. , 18 June 1997); Prosecutor v. Tadic, Decision on Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction, Case No. IT-94-1-A, ¶¶ 45–48, 61–64 (ICTY App. , 2 October 1995). S. Const. art. S. (3 Dallas) at 390. 12 This is now current in Europe under the European Convention on Human Rights (4 November 1950; entered into force 3 September 1953) and in the United States under the combination of its constitutional ex post facto and due process provisions.
V. United Kingdom, Judgment, ¶¶ 34, 60, 62, Eur. Ct. R. Case No. 48/1994/495/577, Application No. 20190/92 (27 October 1995); Cantoni v. France, Judgment, ¶¶ 33, 35, Eur. Ct. , Case No. 45/1995/551/637, Application No. J. (ser. A/B) No. 65, at 53–6 ` Human Rights in (4 December); Cassese, supra note 7, at 145–52; Salvatore Zappala, International Criminal Proceedings 195 (Oxford Univ. Press 2003). 36 Castillo Petruzzi v. Peru, Judgement, ¶ 121, Inter-Am. Ct. , Petition No. 11,319 (30 May 1999), applying American Convention on Human Rights art.

References: v. 
 v. 

V. 
 Application No. 20190
 v. 
 v.