Source: http://supremelaw.org/cc/nlhc/counpa1.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 06:25:10+00:00

Document:
right ... to have the assistance of Counsel for his defence.
States of America (hereinafter "U.S. Constitution").
In discussing  a defendant's  Right  to  Counsel,  the  U.S.
It is undeniable that the explicit use of the word "Counsel"
attorney, as  well as an attorney.  This view is upheld by a U.S.
attorney present, but not his accountant.
the Province of East Jersey (1683) [emphasis added].
recognized as  such in the Bill of Rights when the term "Counsel"
was used instead of the term "attorney."
position of Defendant on interpretation of the U.S. Constitution.
said.  Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824).
the intention  of the  framers.  Woodson v. Murdock, 89 U.S.
meaning.   Pollock v.  Farmers' Loan  & Trust  Co., 157 U.S.
and its  force and  effect to  have been  fully  understood.
held is "unqualified."  See Chandler supra.
and no  excuse for  interpolation or  addition.   Martin  v.
Brown v.  Maryland, 12 Wheat 419;  Craig v. Missouri, 4 Pet.
10;   Tennessee v.  Whitworth, 117 U.S. 139;  Lake County v.
sec. 451;   Cooley's Constitutional Limitations, 2nd ed., P.
fundamental Right to Counsel by the very legal profession itself.
through Counsel of trust to the jury.
with the approval of many Courts.
promise, command or determination.  "You shall receive ...."
Mitchell, Dean,  Nixon and Agnew, and not to mention many others.
He is  defending himself  out of  necessity, not  out of  desire.
Right is to deny his Rights under the Sixth Amendment to Counsel.
support the Constitution which states, in Article VI, Clause 2?
State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
uphold -- to their eternal discredit and dishonor.
your fundamental Rights is a settled matter."
the legal  and the judicial profession escape tarnished "images?"
Is the denial of fundamental Rights to the Defendant "frivolous?"
the People are not going to stand for it.
enjoyment of  life, personal  safety, liberty, and property.
in the case of crimes.
right to  speak for  a Defendant  in  our  Courts  as  attorneys.
contribution of support in bodily strength or other means.
helper.   The common  practice today of the Defendant "assisting"
plaintiff's counsel, or the defendant's counsel.
If the  men who framed the Bill of Rights meant by "COUNSEL"
a licensed  attorney, they  would have  said "licensed attorney".
interest of fairness, let the Court grant the Defendant's motion.
playing games with the meaning of "represent"?
United States, as lawfully amended.
for the  United States  of America.   Preamble  to the  U.S.
Article VI, Cl. 2, U.S. Constitution.
the Sovereign Power, which cannot be lawfully overridden.
act through  the organs  established  by  the  Constitution.
right of  the Defendant  to "enjoy"  the "assistance of Counsel"
and to that extent, the people would not govern.
lieu thereof is being used -- that of the "will of attorneys."
in Court, is a Common Law right secured by the Sixth Amendment.
of Florida, en banc, 36 So.2d 443, 445 (1948).
application, wherein the word "rights" is not qualified.
accountant, not of a lawyer.
for me is not permitted to do so?"
but it has done what is also expressly forbidden.
in harmony with the Constitution?"
significant.   Laymen would  not have to stand for such nonsense.
Licensed attorneys ... who knows?
pretends to protect and uphold.
responsibility for the consequences of said choices.
People, which its officers are sworn to protect.
choice which does not trample upon the Rights of others.
a denial  thereof by  any  Federal  official.    Bolling  v.
"Yager paced the courtroom floor," as he addressed the jury.  Mr.
Rights are only available to black men.
Brotherhood of  Railhood Trainmen v. Virginia State Bar, 377 U.S.
the Right to freedom of speech, secured by the First Amendment.
the decorum of the Court.  To do otherwise is unthinkable.
Courts whom  the Courts  approve and, as a result, all "approved"
attorneys are considered Officers of the Court.
mixed Counsel (attorneys and laymen) or lay Counsel only.
"defend" him for a considerable fee.
cobra.  Perhaps the STAR CHAMBERS weren't so bad after all.
Declaration of  Independence,  which  antedates  all  government.
Rights not be infringed upon.
v. Button  supra, and  the Brotherhood  of Railroad  Trainmen  v.
Virginia State Bar supra, in support of said Right.
difference, and that its application is obvious.
assistance, including that of assistant spokesman.
his Right to non-attorney Counsel.
judicial act  in which  his personal interests are involved.
the case," meaning upon the unfortunate Bar Associations.
this Republic is entitled under the Sixth Amendment.
delegated to  the United States nor to any State through the U.S.
Constitution.  Such a power is an undelegated colorable "office."
Therefore, assuming  the foregoing is true, then the "power"
attorneys or any Bar association.
spokesman, are arbitrarily usurping Defendant's Right.
The Ninth  Amendment  reserves  all  non-enumerated  Rights.
They are  not to  be denied or disparaged, though not enumerated.
would indeed be "frivolous" and without constitutional authority.
from those whom he either does not trust or cannot afford.
The U.S. Supreme Court held in Miller v. Milwaukee, 272 U.S.
reach a  prohibited result, then "... the statute must fail ...."
lawfully done by way of the back door.
choice, due  process of  law, and equal protection under the law.
Insurance Co. v. United States, 277 U.S. 508, 630.
equal protection under that Law.
laws of the United States generally ...."
null and  void and  not binding  upon the Courts.  See Miranda v.
belief, so help Us God, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1746(1).
Dr. Eugene A. Burns, D.C., N.D.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals     "Internal Revenue Service"
10th and Constitution, N.W. !      10th and Constitution, N.W. !

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v. 

v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.