Source: http://pdf-ins-internet.de/giuliano-wildhaber-usd-1-50-billion-ats-us-fla-klage/
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 16:32:32+00:00

Document:
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES USA - Washington, D.C. 20543 www.gsw-global-consult.com = All Evidences online (Videos + Files) Case: 18-12751. This Case Is an Excellent Vehicle for Resolving the Issue ATS Statute of Limitation. The special facts and procedural posture of this case render it ideal for resolving whether the ATS allows liability under a 100% valid kept, foreign (Switzerland) Statute of Limitation. This judgment will become a landmark decision for the future ATS jurisdiction because their is no precedent. It will be very important for courts or other judicial bodies use when deciding later cases with similar issues or facts.
. So Wildhaber had until October 1999 to file a timely complaint. But he filed his complaint in November 2017, more than 18 \HDUVRXWVLGHRIWKH$76¶OLPLWDWLRQVSHULRG. Eingestellt über www.PDF-ins-Internet.de - Haftung für Inhalt und Inhaber aller Rechte ist der Puplisher Kontaktdaten und Anbieterkennung des Puplishers/Autors entnehmen Sie bitte dem PDF-Archives auf www.PDF-ins-Internet.de. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES USA - Washington, D.C. 20543 3 Unexplained Case: 18-12751 Date Filed 12/10/2018 + DENIED 01/16/2019 b) And Wildhaber waived that argument because he did not present it to the district court = Done online (e-filing) at the Broward County Court = With the Complaint ! That was a disregard of my existing evidences and a misjudgment. ATS with a 100% Percent Extraterritorial Nature 1. The Alien Tort Statute (ATS) is a United States law that allows only NON-U.S. Citizens to file lawsuits in U.S. federal courts for certain Violations of International law in his Homeland. The ATS foresaw that the plaintiff must be a foreigner. So ATS logically include to respect also the foreign rules in Switzerland for time limitation. The terms " alien », " treaties » and " law of nations » used in the ATS provided clear indications of the " one hundred percent extraterritorial nature » of the law in the foreign state, since everything must have happened exterritorial. This then also applies logically to the (100% respected) statute of limitations in Switzerland. Limitation Period 100% legal interrupted in Switzerland 2. In Switzerland according Art. 790 § 1 ZGB, the base load is not subject to any statute of limitations, which also applies to claims for which a mortgage pledge is registered, according to " Equality of Law », Art. 8, § 1 BV: I clearly present all this Facts & Proofs already to the District Court in the complaint in advance. Eingestellt über www.PDF-ins-Internet.de - Haftung für Inhalt und Inhaber aller Rechte ist der Puplisher Kontaktdaten und Anbieterkennung des Puplishers/Autors entnehmen Sie bitte dem PDF-Archives auf www.PDF-ins-Internet.de. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES USA - Washington, D.C. 20543 4 Unexplained Case: 18-12751 Date Filed 12/10/2018 + DENIED 01/16/2019 In addition, the Swiss statute of limitations was formally iuristically correctly interrupted by UBS Switzerland AG v. Giuliano Wildhaber May 27, 2016 (Appendix Nr. 1.) also asserted after almost 28 years (Unterbrechung der Verjährung = Interruption of the limitation period). Plaintiff still owes UBS 1.06 Mio CHF in full ! Then I also interrupted the Swiss time limitation by Giuliano Wildhaber v. EFV et al 12.21.2016 (Appendix Nr. 2.) = see legal equality = The real " casus belli » to sue " EFV et al » in time under ATS. US Federal Principles of Equitable Tolling 3. Under these principles, the running of time under a given statute of limitation is deemed to have stopped for a period during which certain circumstances are present: Such considerations, arise under US Federal Principles of Equitable Tolling. ATS has No Explicit Statute of Limitations 4. Come on, that ATS has no explicit statute of limitations. I heard the first time in my life about ATS in 2015 (Google). In such situations, courts apply the limitations periods provided by the jurisdiction not in which they sit, but XQOHVVµDUXOHIURP elsewhere e.g. under Swiss-law (e.g. where all happend) clearly provides a closer analogy than available state statutes, and when the practicalities of litigation make Eingestellt über www.PDF-ins-Internet.de - Haftung für Inhalt und Inhaber aller Rechte ist der Puplisher Kontaktdaten und Anbieterkennung des Puplishers/Autors entnehmen Sie bitte dem PDF-Archives auf www.PDF-ins-Internet.de. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES USA - Washington, D.C. 20543 5 Unexplained Case: 18-12751 Date Filed 12/10/2018 + DENIED 01/16/2019 that rule a significantly more appropriate and also more logical = All these factors points towards borrowing the - Swiss Statute of Limitations - for the ATS (ATCA). The Century-Crime is a 100% Proven Fact in My Case 5. Wrong replay was a technical pro se mistake = after I presented all proofs at District Court = So nothing changed at facts & proofs. In International-law no limitations period exists for the prosecution of crimes against humanity. And the ATS-law is International-law + The crime is a 100% proven fact in my case + although every pre-trial discovery was banned + Mediator (Lawyer Lardin, Miami) + Mediation (deadline 11/30/2018) + the already fixed Trial Date April 26, 2019, R. 10-2, W. D. Ferguson Jr, 17-cv-62542-BB, 400 N. Miami, was later canceled. ATS should also be Governed by International-Law 6. Because of all these reasons, it may validly be asked, if the basis of the claim under the ATS is a violation of International-law, why the limitations period should not also be governed by International-law. 7KDW¶VVLPSOHORJLFDQGlegally justified. Resolving Cases on the Merits = The Highest Law-Maxim = Then already Won Eingestellt über www.PDF-ins-Internet.de - Haftung für Inhalt und Inhaber aller Rechte ist der Puplisher Kontaktdaten und Anbieterkennung des Puplishers/Autors entnehmen Sie bitte dem PDF-Archives auf www.PDF-ins-Internet.de. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES USA - Washington, D.C. 20543 6 Unexplained Case: 18-12751 Date Filed 12/10/2018 + DENIED 01/16/2019 7. For certain limited categories of cases, the state supreme court still operates under mandatory review, usually with regard to cases involving the interpretation of the state constitution or capital punishment. But for the vast majority, the state supreme court possesses the discretion to grant certiorari (known as review in Latin). Three Unexplained Decisions Regarding the Legal Issues These cases usually pertain to issues which different appellate courts within its jurisdiction have decided differently, or highly controversial cases involving a completely new legal issue never seen in that state + important for the USA. I received 2x unexplained decisions by the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit, and 1x unexplained decision at the Federal Court, Miami regarding the legal issues (that I have asked) in relation to the interpretation of International- e.g. ATS-Law. I presented 100% Evidences already at Broward County 17th Judicial Circuit 8. In this e.g. ATS-Case I presented 100% evidences already at Broward County 17th Judicial Circuit with my complaint in advance (Appendix Nr. 3.: Filing # 63671617 E-Filed 11/06/2017 05:38:21 AM). That was legally sufficient to prove that the - Swiss Statute of Time Limitations - was 100% legal kept in Switzerland. Eingestellt über www.PDF-ins-Internet.de - Haftung für Inhalt und Inhaber aller Rechte ist der Puplisher Kontaktdaten und Anbieterkennung des Puplishers/Autors entnehmen Sie bitte dem PDF-Archives auf www.PDF-ins-Internet.de. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES USA - Washington, D.C. 20543 7 Unexplained Case: 18-12751 Date Filed 12/10/2018 + DENIED 01/16/2019 Three Unexplained Decisions Regarding the Legal Issues 9. The three times (1x Miami & 2x Atlanta) 100% unexplained decisions regarding - STATUTE OF TIME LIMITATION - under the ATS in this case presents the issue in as gripping a context as this Court is likely to see, look through: I have kept the Statute of Time Limitation in Switzerland. The ATS plaintiffs in Kiobel I obtained also a writ of certiorari from the United States Supreme Court. I/we was/were US-Fla. real estate investors and paid many years taxes in Florida (in record). This question of law in my case was not disputed. Because of all these reasons this Court should grant certiorari. CONCLUSION Parties who are not satisfied with the decision of a lower court must petition the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case. The primary means to petition the court for review is to ask it to grant a writ of certiorari. This is a request that the Supreme Court order a lower court to send up the record of the case for review. The Court usually is not under any obligation to hear these cases, and it usually only does so if the case could have national significance, might harmonize conflicting decisions in the federal Circuit courts, and/or could have precedential value and if the state or appelation court decided a Constitutional issue. For the foregoing reasons (see the Sixth Amendment) the petition for a writ of certiorari can and should be granted. Eingestellt über www.PDF-ins-Internet.de - Haftung für Inhalt und Inhaber aller Rechte ist der Puplisher Kontaktdaten und Anbieterkennung des Puplishers/Autors entnehmen Sie bitte dem PDF-Archives auf www.PDF-ins-Internet.de. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES USA - Washington, D.C. 20543 8 Unexplained Case: 18-12751 Date Filed 12/10/2018 + DENIED 01/16/2019 VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION I, Giuliano Stefano Giovanni WILDHABER born June 04, 1952, Swiss Citizen (from Flums at Lütisburg), 35x years married, both retired, 3x adult children, former 45 years self-employed businessman (20.-65.), declare that I found 12/17/2018 only by chance the 12/10/2018 JUDGMENT (by Google) and I authorize this filing. Dated and executed on February 14, 2019 Respectfully submitted by, GIULIANO STEFANO GIOVANNI WILDHABER Plaintiff pro se (Counsel of Record) CH-9606 Buetschwil SG, P.O. Box 118 Phone: +41 76 690 12 13 + Email: g.wildhaber@gmx.ch Applicant's Signature : /s/ Giuliano Wildhaber (Swiss Sovereign) CC: Counsel of Record - Plaintiff GIULIANO STEFANO GIOVANNI WILDHABER pro se CH-9606 Buetschwil SG, Post Office Box No. 118 g.wildhaber@gmx.ch Eingestellt über www.PDF-ins-Internet.de - Haftung für Inhalt und Inhaber aller Rechte ist der Puplisher Kontaktdaten und Anbieterkennung des Puplishers/Autors entnehmen Sie bitte dem PDF-Archives auf www.PDF-ins-Internet.de. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES USA - Washington, D.C. 20543 9 Unexplained Case: 18-12751 Date Filed 12/10/2018 + DENIED 01/16/2019 Certificate of Service: Cc: Swiss Voters & Citizens = WE HAVE THE FINAL SAY ! With Supreme Political Power guaranted by the Swiss Constitution Swiss-Sovereign@gmx.ch Cc: Swiss Confederation Political Control Swiss Political Supervisory Authority Swiss-Confederation-Supervisory@gmx.ch Cc: Jennifer Altman + Stephan Becker For and behalf EFV- & EBK-Finma jennifer.altman@pillsburylaw.com stephan.becker@pillsburylaw.com Certificate of Compliance: 1552 words + 14 pt. + times new roman + double spacing Cover (light) blue + forty (40 x) entries / court documents Eingestellt über www.PDF-ins-Internet.de - Haftung für Inhalt und Inhaber aller Rechte ist der Puplisher Kontaktdaten und Anbieterkennung des Puplishers/Autors entnehmen Sie bitte dem PDF-Archives auf www.PDF-ins-Internet.de.

References: Art. 790
 § 1
 Art. 8
 § 1
 v. 
 v.