Source: https://stus.com/Polycast-Technology-Corp-v-Uniroyal-Inc-cartoon-civ0008
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 01:14:31+00:00

Document:
Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.
Home > Case Law > Civil Procedure > Polycast Technology Corp. v. Uniroyal, Inc.
parties may depose non-party witnesses, deposition, testimony, protective order.
Movants, protective order, federal rule of civil procedure 30(b)(2), record a deposition by nonstenographic means and is given the choice of the method of recording, absent annoyance, embarrassment, oppression, and undue burden or expense.
Grable & Sons Metal Products, Inc. v. Darue Engineering & Manufacturing; federal forum for federal tax litigation sufficiently substantial for exercise of federal question jurisdiction; federal title law; division of labor between state and federal courts.
Zubulake v. UBS Warburg LLC; corporate counsel has duty to communicate discovery obligations so all relevant information is discovered, retained, and produced; once duty to preserve attaches, identify all sources of discoverable information.
Roell v. Withrow; When a party has signaled consent to the magistrate judge's authority to hear a case through actions rather than words, there is little value in strict insistence on an express consent requirement.
Moss v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc; The burden of proving that a challenged discovery request is relevant is on the party who makes the request, while proving that the request is unduly burdensome rests with the party making the objection.
Teague v. Target Corp; Spoliation is the destruction or material alteration of evidence or the failure to preserve property for another\'s use as evidence in pending or reasonably foreseeable litigation; mitigation-of-damages doctrine.
Ashcroft v. Iqbal; pleading; facts to support claim; insufficient pleading.
Helmert v. Butterball, LLC; e-discovery; unduly burdensome electronic discovery request.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.