Source: http://texas-opinions.com/Tex-2010-Texas-Supreme-Court-Opinions.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 08:18:42+00:00

Document:
The Court's opinion of March 27, 2009 is withdrawn and the opinion of this date is substituted.
The judgment, issued March 27, 2009, remains in place.
Link to E-briefs for Case No. 05-0729 EXXON CORP. v. EMERALD OIL & GAS CO., L.P.
Link to E-briefs for Case No. 05-1076 EXXON CORP. v. EMERALD OIL & GAS CO.
The Court's opinion of June 4, 2010 is withdrawn and the opinion of this date is substituted.
SOLAR APPLICATIONS, INC. v. T. A. OPERATING ENG'G CORP.
The Court affirms in part and reverses in part the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.
The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and affirms the trial court's judgment.
View Electronic Briefs Case No. 09-0330 LEORDEANU v. AMERICAN PROTECTION INS. CO.
With the exception of 09-0474, the Court conditionally grants the writs of mandamus.
View Electronic Briefs in 09-0683 CHRISTI BAY TEMPLE v. GUIDEONE SPECIALTY MUT. INS. CO.
hearing oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and dismisses the case.
conditionally grants the writ of mandamus.
View Electronic Briefs in No. 06-0714 ROBINSON v. CROWN CORK & SEAL CO., INC.
View Electronic Briefs in 08-0215 UNIV. OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS v.
improvidently granted. The petition for review is denied.
afforded a far greater monetary recovery.
and one common-law, with inconsistent procedures, standards, elements, defenses, and remedies.
appeals erred in affirming the trial-court judgment on Williams’ common-law claim.
the statutory sexual-harassment issues raised by Waffle House.
The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to that court.
reverse the court of appeals’ judgment in part, affirm in part, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings.
Department’s request for attorney’s fees was purely defensive in nature, unconnected to any claim for monetary relief.
and the court of appeals incorrectly held otherwise.
federal court, and (2) the definition of “tertiary recusal motion” in Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code section 30.016.
appeals’ judgment in part and reverse it in part, and remand to that court with instructions.
remand to the court of appeals. The court of appeals shall abate pending a ruling on the motion to recuse Judge Herman.
thus, whether the trial court had jurisdiction over Barth’s suit.
the claimant’s compensable injury by failing to adhere to Texas Labor Code section 409.021(c)’s sixty-day deadline. __ S.
appeals’ judgment and remand this case to the trial court for further proceedings.
court for further proceedings. Tex. R. App. P. 59.1, 60.2(d).
ZACHARY P. SIGMUNDIK, AS THE SOLE AND LEGAL HEIRS AND BENEFICIARIES OF THOMAS M.
SIGMUNDIK, DECEASED, AND/OR OF THE ESTATE OF THOMAS M. SIGMUNDIK, DECEASED; OTTO L.
allocated to the estate. See Tex. R. App. P. 59.1.
SCOTT AND WHITE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND SCOTT, SHERWOOD AND BRINDLEY FOUNDATION v.
The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment in part and renders judgment.
See Electronic Briefs in IN RE ENSCO OFFSHORE INTERNATIONAL CO.
See Electronic Briefs in IN RE ODYSSEY HEALTHCARE, INC.
KENEDY, DECEASED; FROST NATIONAL BANK AND PABLO SUESS, TRUSTEES OF THE JOHN G.
The Court conditionally grants the writs of mandamus.
See Electronic Briefs in 08-0528 THE JOHN G. AND MARIE STELLA KENEDY MEMORIAL FOUND. v.
See Electronic Briefs in THE JOHN G. AND MARIE STELLA KENEDY MEMORIAL FOUND. v.
See Electronic Briefs in ZINC NACIONAL, S.A. v. BOUCHÉ TRUCKING, INC.
The Court conditionally grants the writ of mandamus.
View Electronic Briefs in 07-0786 TEX. DEPT. OF INS. v. RECONVEYANCE SERVICES, INC.
View Electronic Briefs 08-0316 METHODIST HEALTHCARE SYSTEM OF SAN ANTONIO, LTD., L.L.P. v.
View Electronic Briefs in 09-0733 IN RE COLUMBIA MED. CTR. OF LAS COLINAS, INC.
Justice Harriet O'Neill delivered a dissenting opinion in SW Bell Telephone Co. v. Markeing on Hold (Tex.
Justice Phil Johnson delivered the opinion of the Court.
Medina, Justice Green, and Justice Guzman joined.
in which Justice Johnson joined.
Justice Don R. Willett delivered a concurring opinion in In re ADM Investor Services, Inc.
challenge to the jury's rejection of his affirmative defense.
findings are submitted, provide a supplementary brief to this Court.
judgment, and remands the case to the county court.
The Court reverses in part the court of appeals' judgment and renders judgment.
Justice Eva M. Guzman delivered the opinion of the Court.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v.

 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.