Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/71216087/Network-Signatures-v-Exxon-Mobil
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 14:59:00+00:00

Document:
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 2:11-cv-08904-RGK-AN: Network Signatures Inc v. Exxon Mobil Corporation. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, the Hon. R. Gary Klausner presiding. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l4Bb for more info.
Eight One Two v. Purdue Pharma et. al.
Webvention v. GNC Holdings et. al.
Quest Licensing v. Bloomberg Et. Al.
Micrografx v. Google et. al.
CpuMate et. al. v. Cooler Master et. al.
Straight Path IP Group v. Huawei Investment & Holding et. al.
acts and transactions complained of herein were conceived, carried out, made effective, and had effect within the State of California and within this district, among other places. Defendant resides in this judicial district by virtue of its business activities in this district and, on information and belief, has committed acts of infringement or of contributory infringement and inducement of infringement within this judicial district.
Defendant and its officers, agents, servants and employees, and all others acting on their behalves or in concert with Defendant, from infringing the 122 Patent, Network Signatures and the United States Government will be greatly and irreparably harmed.
damages caused to Network Signatures by reason of Defendants infringement, in accordance with 35 U.S.C. Section 284, as well as enhanced damages under 35 U.S.C. Section 285; 8. 9. For an award of damages according to proof; For a judicial determination that this case is exceptional under 35 U.S.C.
William J. OBrien Attorneys for Plaintiff, NETWORK SIGNATURES, INC.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff, Network Signatures, Inc., hereby demands trial by jury in this action.
Teaching for Quality Learning at University What the Student Does 3rd Edition Chapter 1 the Changing Scene in University Teaching.capit 1.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.