Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/051108.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 20:46:05+00:00

Document:
States District Court in Massachusetts, under Judge Patti B.
Saris. Representing the plaintiffs are David J. Bershad and J.
jawitten@jonesday.com, tcitera@jonesday.com; and Jeffrey I.
3500, Los Angeles, CA 90071-1560, Phone: 213-683-9100.
"Pacificare Health Systems, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, et al."
These cases seek damages, treble damages and other relief.
pricing violations and overpricing of the drug.
state law claims. Plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal.
District Court in Massachusetts, under Judge Joan N. Ericksen.
Judge Richard A. Schell. Representing the company is Gerard G.
(1) Roger F. Claxton, Claxton & Hill, 3131 McKinney, L.B.
(3) Christopher S. Polaszek, Maya Saxena, and Peter E.
launch a class action suit, The CBC News reports.
to discuss a class action suit.
eating. ...Your dreams [are] kind of gone at the time."
currently only compensate for bodily harm, not emotional damage.
directors, Apollo Management and Marquee Holdings as defendants.
expedited proceedings on October 29, 2004.
things, approval by the court.
refused to grant class certification.
by the Company as exempt employees over the prior four years.
a related case titled "William Baer and Anisnara Hamlzonek v.
American Multi-Cinema, Inc. and DOES 1 to 100, case no.
the process of being formalized.
January 11, 2005 and January 25, 2005.
consolidated and appointed lead plaintiff and co-lead counsel.
2005, the plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed the Georgia Actions.
action to Georgia are still pending.
Schwarzenegger's initiatives, The Sacramento Bee reports.
the lawsuit is resolved on its merits.
vote activities aimed at defeating the two propositions.
state employees who pay dues to Local 1000.
attack on the working conditions of the union's membership.
assessment fund, making a preliminary injunction impractical.
against county officials, The Auburn Journal reports.
watched as other women underwent similar humiliations.
Although his department had yet to examine the lawsuit, Capt.
are never allowed to watch the opposite gender being searched.
closed, private room, Mr. Fitzgerald told The Auburn Journal.
and compelled to strip naked, by an Asian female deputy."
a noticeable cut on her face.
others in a two-year period were subjugated.
be encouraged to speak up.
s/11complaint.txt, to view the suit.
(916) 443-6911 Fax: (916) 447-8336, E-mail: mark@markmerin.com.
recently put on hold, The Associated Press reports.
affected by the abuse will not be known for a couple of weeks.
costs would potentially bankrupt them.
have to pay for which claims, according to the lawyers.
out periods have closed," the attorneys noted in their motion.
counties and has 89,000 parishioners.
story (February 18, 2003) reports.
Action Reporter story (February 18, 2003) reports.
The suit, styled "Welch & Forbes, Inc. v. Cendant Corp., et.
Fenner & Smith Incorporated; and Chase Securities Inc.
claims based upon the purchases of PRIDES after April 16, 1998.
Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, v.
LLP, Consolidated Case No. 4:02-CV-1186-CAS."
behalf, are sought by the plaintiffs.
B. Nathanson, Nancy B. Peretsman, William D. Savoy, John H.
LLP, and Charter Communications, Inc."
are related to the Federal Derivative Action.
appeals nor have briefing schedules been set.
has paid $4.5 million in cash in lieu of issuing such shares.
the recent conclusion of the SEC investigation.
prejudice. Procedurally therefore, the settlements are final.
of the Employee Retirement Income Securities Act (ERISA).
prohibited forfeiture of benefits under ERISA.
other relief as the court may deem just.
and the Company filed its objections.
Court for the District of Connecticut, under Judge Stefan R.
that the cash balance plan violates ERISA's "anti-backloading"
the Northern District of Illinois, under Judge Paul E. Plunkett.
during which the Company does not provide insurance coverage."
Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law.
Complaint and denied liability on all counts.
administrative costs and expenses in an amount up to $14,000.
Hearing is scheduled for December 12, 2005.
CA, through wholesales and distributors.
as designated on the label on the back of the package.
questions may contact the company at 315-512-5900.
Fair Labor Standards Act ("FLSA").
law firms that represent plaintiffs.
& Fearon, LLP of New York and New Jersey; Deutsch Resnick, P.A.
lee@sfclasslaw.com or dan@sfclasslaw.com; Joseph S. Fine, Esq.
shoplifting in 1997, for which she received probation.
illegal strip searches, The Associated Press reports.
county's insurer will pay out.
directors and officers, captioned Robert Greenburg, et al. v.
actions, with named plaintiffs Nicholas Radosevich, Howard E.
are time-barred under the applicable statute of limitations.
The plaintiffs have filed a notice of appeal of the dismissal.
behalf of post-petition claimants with respect to such product.
ordered that the proceeding be transferred to the USBC.
allegedly wrongfully deducted from truck drivers' earnings.
thus ending all further appellate review.
arguments upon which such party would rely in the remand trial.
the final settlement of claims to the court for final approval.
concluded in the first quarter of 2006.
action) who are purportedly not included in the "Albillo" class.
full and final disposition of the remaining issue in "Albillo,"
the plaintiffs from re-litigating this issue in "Renteria."
Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
Judge Robert W. Pratt. Representing the Company are Brian L.
District of New York is set for February 22,2006.
than $50 billion of goodwill.
The lawsuits seek an unspecified amount in compensatory damages.
defendants. That motion is also pending.
litigation matter and will pay $100 million.
unspecified damages and unspecified equitable relief.
the consolidated ERISA complaint on May 20, 2005.
County of New York were dismissed on "forum non conveniens"
three of these four cases.
On July 1, 2003, a suit styled "Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v.
proceedings under the caption "In re AOL Time Warner Inc.
Company filed a motion to dismiss the complaint.
certain funds administered by the Division.
summons notifying defendants of commencement of an action.
described above under the caption "In re AOL Time Warner Inc.
complaint on June 14, 2005.
has scheduled the final approval hearing for February 22, 2006.
transferred to the MSBI Settlement Fund.
the Quebec Superior Court decision in the chain's favor.
case was more appropriate for the Quebec Labour Relations Board.
capable of handling the case and granting damages to Mr.
the judgment and will consider an appeal.
14, 2005, inclusive (the "Class Period").
$9.86 per share on September 15, 2005, a drop of 22.8%.
For more details, contact Ann D. White, Esq. or Mandy Roth, Esq.
be met without a material drop in raw material prices.
restate its financial results from the second quarter of 2005.
$0.60 to $0.70 per share, a reduction of greater than 100%.
22.8% on unusually heavy trading volume.
20, 2003 and August 25, 2005, inclusive, (the "Class Period").
falling approximately 9% to $18.26 per share the following day.
probe of the Company to a formal investigation.
20, 2003 and August 25, 2005 (the "Class Period").
close at $18.16 per share on August 26, 2005.
1-800-337-4983, Fax: 212/490-2022, E-mail: SSBNY@aol.com.
("Guidant") (NYSE: GDT) and certain individual defendants.
as low as $57.05 per share in heavy trading.
lawsuit against Motive, Inc. (Nasdaq: MOTV).
not be confused or misled by these other announcements.
The complaint charges Tempur-Pedic, Dale E. Williams, Robert B.
facts, which the Company knew or recklessly disregarded.
19, 2004, to close at $11.70 per share.

References: v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v.