Source: http://www.childrenslegalrightsjournal.com/childrenslegalrightsjournal/volume_37_issue_1?pg=136
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 10:33:19+00:00

Document:
16 See SHANNON D. SEXTON, A Custody System Free of Gender Preferences and Consistent With the Best Interests of the Child: Suggestions for a More Suitable Custody System, 88 KY. L. J. 761, 766 (2000).
17 See ELROD, supra note 12, at § 1: 6.
18 See generally Allan Roth, The Tender Years Presumption in Child Custody Disputes, 15 J. FAM. L. 423 (1976). 19 Robert Hughes, Jr., Are Custody Decisions Biased in Favor of Mothers?, THE HUFFINGTON POST, (Nov. 29, 2011), http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-hughes/are-custody-decisions-bia_b_870709.html; see SEXTON, supra note 16, at 781-92.
20 See ELROD, supra note 12, at § 1: 5.
21 See Freeland v. Freeland, 159 P. 698, 699 (Wash. 1916).
22 See generally ELROD, supra note 12; See SEXTON, supra note 16, at 700 (“unless the mother was proven unfit,” which is an extremely difficult standard, “the mother was awarded custody”).
23 See also Random v. Random, 170 N.W. 313, 314 (1918); Hines v. Hines, 185 N. W. 91, 92 (1921); Duncan v. Duncan, 80 So. 697, 703 (Miss. 1919); McKay v. McKay, 149 P. 1032, 1032 (Or. 1915); Jenkins v. Jenkins, 181 N.W. 826, 827 (Wis. 1921); Phillips v. Phillips, 149 P.2d 967, 971 (Or. 1944); Shrout v. Shrout, 356 P.2d 935, 936 (Or. 1960); Bruce v. Bruce, 285 P. 30, 37 (Okla. 1930); Ellis v. Johnson, 260 S. W. 1010, 1012 (Mo. Ct. App. 1924).

References: § 1
 § 1
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.