Source: https://stus.com/Contract-of-Adhesion-cartoon-cto0046
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 06:02:45+00:00

Document:
Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corp. The law disfavors contracts that relieve a person from his own negligence. An agreement violates public policy if it adversely affects the public interest. Liability waiver.
Wyeth v. Levine; Where it is not impossible for a drug manufacturer to comply with both state and federal law, common law claims do not stand as an obstacle to the accomplishment of Congress's purposes in the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act.
Delaney v. Reynolds; When an intervening occurrence was foreseeable, the causal chain of events remains intact and the defendant's original negligence remains a proximate cause of the plaintiff's injury; intervening cause; superseding cause.
Avila v. Citrus Community College District; Primary assumption of risk arises when as matter of law and policy defendant owes no duty to protect a plaintiff from particular harms; demurrer.
Rainer v. Union Carbide Corp. An employer acts with deliberate intention, so the employee's injury is excepted from workers' compensation exclusivity, only when it determines to injure an employee and uses some means appropriate to that end.
A.W. v. Lancaster County School District 0001. Questions of foreseeability in the context of determining whether an alleged tortfeasor's duty to take reasonable care has been breached must be decided by the finder of fact. Avoid Jury Trial.
Averyt v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.; Where the jury's damages award is supported by the evidence, a reviewing court will not reverse it.
Hymowitz v. Eli Lilly & Co.; Under the market share liability theory, liability will be apportioned to each defendant according to its share of the market for the product giving rise to the plaintiff's injuries.
Marcus v. Staubs; a tortfeasor whose negligence is a substantial factor in bringing about injuries is not relieved from liability by the intervening acts of third persons if those acts were reasonably foreseeable by the original tortfeasor.
Sindell v. Abbott Laboratories; when the precise defendant cannot be identified through no fault of the plaintiff, liability may be apportioned based on the share of the market held by each negligent manufacturer. Summers v. Tice.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.