Source: http://texas-opinions.com/law-fraud.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 19:20:07+00:00

Document:
upon the misrepresentation, and (6) thereby suffered injury. In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.
960 S.W.2d 41, 47 (Tex. 1998).
representation was made. Formosa, 960 S.W.2d at 48; Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc., 708 S.
representation is relied on by the person entering into the contract. Id. at § 27.01(a)(1).
Grant Thornton LLP v. Prospect High Income Fund, 314 S.W.3d 913, 921 (Tex. 2010).
purpose of deceiving, and with no intention of performing the act. Spoljaric v. Percival Tours, Inc., 708 S.
representation, it may be inferred from the party's subsequent acts after the representation is made. Id.
v. Niemeyer, 241 S.W.2d 733, 738 (Tex. Civ. App.-El Paso 1951, orig. proceeding)).
circumstantial evidence’ of fraud” is some evidence of fraudulent intent, enough to support a verdict. Id.
actively and justifiably relying on that representation. See De Santis v. Wackenhut Corp., 793 S.
W.2d 670, 688 (Tex. 1990); Trenholm v. Ratcliff, 646 S.W.2d 927, 930 (Tex. 1983).
of limitations for fraud begins to run from the time the party knew of the misrepresentation. Little v.
Smith, 943 S.W.2d 414, 420 (Tex. 1997).
transaction in which he intends or has reason to expect their conduct to be influenced.
statutory fraud (Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 27.01 (Vernon 2002) (fraud in a real estate transaction)).
(6) the party thereby suffered injury. In re FirstMerit Bank, N.A., 52 S.W.3d 749, 758 (Tex. 2001).
causes injury to the plaintiff. Tex. Bus. & Com. Code Ann. § 27.01.

References: v. 
 § 27
 v. 
 v. 

v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 § 27
 § 27