Source: http://www.nossaman.com/rsullivan
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 16:28:51+00:00

Document:
Bob Sullivan is a senior litigator with significant trial and appellate experience. He specializes in administrative, governmental law, labor, and healthcare law. He has represented clients before state and local government agencies since 1967, having tried approximately 300 contested adjudicatory hearings under the California Administrative Procedure Act.
Mr. Sullivan represents lawyers, real estate brokers, doctors, contractors, engineers as well as most other professionals who are regulated by the state. He also counsels a variety of healthcare providers, including individual physicians, medical groups, ambulance companies, hospitals, and mental health clinics before state and federal agencies in the areas of malpractice suits, employment disputes, medical staff credentialing, licensing, and regulatory disputes. Mr. Sullivan is experienced as an arbitrator in healthcare law disputes.
Mr. Sullivan has been recognized by San Francisco magazine (2004 - 2017) as one of the Northern California "Super Lawyers" in healthcare and is also AV Preeminent® Peer Review Rated by Martindale-Hubbell.
Skelly v. California State Personnel Board. As Chief Counsel of the California State Employees Association I represented Dr. Skelly in challenging the due process provisions of the State Civil Service Act. The California Supreme Court ruled in favor of Dr. Skelly holding that state civil service employees were entitled to a pre-termination due process hearing and held that the post-termination hearing provisions of the Civil Service Act was an unconstitutional deprivation of due process.
Barber v. State Personnel Board. As a companion case of Skelly v. State Personnel Board, the Supreme Court, following the Skelly decision, held that Mr. Barber was entitled to be paid until such time as he received a hearing on his appeal from termination of his employment.
Wood v. Superior Court. Board of Medical Quality Assurance issued administrative subpoenas for medical records pertaining to certain patients of two doctors who were suspected of prescribing medication under suspicious circumstances. The doctors refused to comply and the board sought judicial enforcement of the subpoenas. Court of Appeals granted a peremptory writ directing the trial court to set aside its judgments ordering compliance. The court held that "good cause" must be demonstrated before government can compel disclosure of medical records.
Menefee & Son v. Department of Food & Agriculture. Growers brought action against the Department of Food and Agriculture challenging seizure of crops because of illegal application of poison. Superior Court, Sacramento County entered judgment in favor of department, and growers appealed. The Court of Appeal reversed the decision, holding that the seizure and the statute authorizing it were unconstitutional.
Armistead v. California State Personnel Board. Former civil service employee filed petition for writ of mandate, seeking to compel State Personnel Board to set aside his resignation. Then Superior Court, Sacramento County dismissed petition, and employee appealed. The Supreme Court reversed the decision. This case defines underground regulations and its holding applies to all state agencies.
Antioch Park Medical Group v. Dept. of Health Services. Medical group successfully sued Department to invalidate an overpayment audit and finding of the department based solely on a statistical sample extrapolation. The court found the use of such a statistical method is unreliable and unauthorized by California law. The Department did not appeal and paid the plaintiff's attorney fees and costs.
Vielehr v. State Personnel Board. Proceeding on petition for administrative mandamus to review decision of State Personnel Board discharging tax representative trainee in state Department of Human Resources Development. Superior Court, Fresno County denied petition and petitioner appealed. Court of Appeal held that petitioner's conviction of possession of marijuana off the job, did not establish a sufficient probative nexus between the failure of good behavior of tax representative trainee in state Department of Human Resources Development and the finding of discredit to the agency or employment to justify disciplinary action. The decision was reversed and remanded.
HealthCare Partners. A diverse group of physicians whose purpose is to contract with HMOs to provide medical services to clients of the HMO on a capitation basis. We do acquisitions, joint ventures, corporate structuring, employment issues, real estate leasing and litigation; we are currently assisting in securing a "limited" Knox-Keene license.
Healthcare Professional Licensure. Represent HMOs, hospitals, physicians, nurses and other healthcare professionals regarding professional licensing issues, e.g., application, suspension and revocation and reinstatement of licenses.
Successfully negotiated a settlement with the Contractors State License Board of California for a statewide emergency electrical contractor accused of fraudulent advertising and performing unnecessary work. The company changed its advertising and its practices in how it performed job estimates and the company retained its license.
Represented a bathroom building supplier in a citation and fine proceeding brought by the Division of Occupational Safety and Health. Three violations of the Occupational Health and Safety Act were alleged. They involved an unsafe work place (live loads), failure to report a serious industrial accident timely, and failure to maintain an industrial injury and illness plan. The case was settled without any admissions for a mere fraction of the original citation amount.
Represented a large pool contractor whose business failed leaving numerous homeowners with dry holes. The majority shareholders were unaware that the responsible managing employee of the company had looted it. We convinced the District Attorney that our client had been a victim of embezzlement and felony criminal charges were filed against the responsible managing employee and his wife. The corporate license of the pool company was surrendered, but other licenses of the majority shareholders, who were not involved in the management of the pool company, and whose companies operated distinctly separate from the pool company were preserved.
Selected to the Northern California Super Lawyers list for 2004-2018.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.