Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/314903877/Baker-v-Holder-Reply-Brief
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 11:00:17+00:00

Document:
Motivation Innovations, LLC v. Express, Inc., C.A. No. 11-615-SLR-MPT (D. Del. Apr. 24, 2012).
such evidence. This alone entitles him to a remand.
came down and without any opportunity to even provide evidence.
She asks too much. Remand is appropriate.
v. Holder, 585 F. Appx 447 (9th Cir. 2014) (unpublished), cert.
Chovan, 735 F.3d at 1142, and Enos, 585 F. Appx at 447-48).
Under Chovan (decided after District of Columbia v.
Appellants declined to suggest such evidence exists.
1048, 1052 (9th Cir. 2003).
disposed of the case as not being a viable challenge.
consistent with those decisions and should be rejected.
rates for those convicted of domestic violence crimes); Enos, 585 F.
the statute is unconstitutional as applied to the [a]ppellants. . ..
decisions of counsel in previous cases to which he was not a party.
And for good reason: there is none.
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure compel it.
motions practice, which it unequivocally did. A.O.B. 7-8, 18.
accord, its power is not absolute. Compare A.O.B. 19 (citing Fed.
the complaint to overcome the deficiencies raised by the court. Cal.
(9th Cir. 1972); Potter v. McCall, 433 F.2d 1087, 1088 (9th Cir.
order vacating oral argument on motion to dismiss).
they were. F.A. Br. 18. It was woefully insufficient on both counts.
rescheduled to 2/25/2013 at 1:30 PM before Judge Stephen V.
court requested from all parties was complete by January 16, 2013.
it would treat the Attorney Generals brief as a motion to dismiss.
dismissala fact the Attorney General does not attempt to dispute.
complaint with prejudice, as was required of it. Manzarek v. St.
multiple attempts to perfect the pleading had failed. F.A. Br. 18-19.
this Court in Baker v. Holder, 475 F. Appx 156, 157 (9th Cir. 2012).
likely to recidivate. Chovan, 735 F.3d at 1141-42; Enos, 585 F.
provide evidence supporting those facts or to amend his complaint.
the sufficiency of complaints, not requests for leave to amend them.
consider the proposed amendments in the first instance.
such a finding. Id.; A.O.B. 21.
complaint. Baker, 475 F. Appx at 157.
minimum, be allowed leave to amend to assert those claims.
order and remand of his claims for further proceedings.

References: v. 

v. 
 v.

 v. 
 V.

 v. 
 v.