Source: http://knit.mao.kiev.ua/en/archive/1998/2/016
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 02:22:22+00:00

Document:
Procedure of processing groud-based and space measurements of geophysical fields for the purpose of predicting earthquakes is considered. Much attention is gives to the processing and analysis of those fields forerunners of seismic events were detected earlier. A mathematical model of earthquake prediction is suggested. Detection of forerunners is regarded as a problem of detecting a forerunner signal on the background of a multidimensional stochastic process which is represented by measurements of geophysical fields in the ionosphere and on the Earth's surface.
1. Abdullabekov K. N. Electromagnetic phenomena in the Earth's crust, 232 p. (Fan, Tashkent, 1989) [in Russian].
2. Geodynamics and deep structure of the seismogenic zones of Ukraine: collection of scientific papers , 192 p. (Nauk. dumka, Kiev, 1992) [in Russian].
3. Geodynamics and deep structure of the seismogenic zones of Ukraine: collection of scientific papers, 239 p. (Nauk. dumka, Kiev, 1993) [in Russian].
4. Geodynamical Studies in Ukraine: Sb. nauch. tr., 210 p. (Nauk. dumka, Kiev, 1995) [in Russian].
5. Golikov Iu. V., Pilipenko V. A., Dcosta A. Geomagnetic pulsations excited by powerful earthquakes. Geomagnetizm i Aeronomiia, 25, 824—828 (1985) [In Russian].
6. The study of geodynamic processes on the territory of the USSR: collection of scientific papers, 122 p. (Nauk. dumka, Kiev, 1989) [in Russian].
7. Kotsarenko N. Ya., Korepanov V. E., Ivchenko V. N. Investigations of the ionospheric precursors of earthquakes project "Poperedzhennya". Kosm. nauka tehnol., 1 (1), 96—99 (1995) [in Ukrainian].
8. Kuznetsova V. G. The study of geodynamic processes and precursors of earthquakes in the Carpathian Mountains on the basis of research tectonomagnetic. In: Earthquake Prediction, Is. 7, 219—233 (Donysh, Dushanbe; Moscow, 1986) [in Russian].
9. Mostovoi S. V. Optimal Estimations of Parameters of Geophysical Fields, 195 p. (Nauk. dumka, Kiev, 1987) [in Russian].
10. Mostovoi S. V., Mostovoy V. S., Osadchuk A. E. Monitoring Seismically Hazardous Zones and Ecologically Dangerous Objects in Order to Forecast the Risk. Geophys. J., 15 (2), 269—275 (1995) [in Russian].
11. Development of seismic prediction research in Ukraine, 179 p. (Nauk. dumka, Kiev, 1984) [in Russian].
12. Rakhimov I. A., Rizaev K. I., Khanberdiev A., et al. The wave perturbations electron content of the ionosphere in the period of high seismic activity. Ionospheric effects of earthquakes, 14—15 (Ashhabad, 1991) [in Russian].
13. Sagalova E. A. The implementation of the long-term prognosis in Vrancea. Geofiz. zhurn., 9 (6), 84—89 (1987) [in Russian].
14. Seismic zoning of the USSR territory, 307 p. (Nauka, Moscow, 1980) [in Russian].
15. Seismic prognostic studies on the territory of the USSR, 152 p. (Nauk. dumka, Kiev, 1988) [in Russian].
16. Modern geodynamics and earthquake prediction in Ukraine, 100 p. (Nauk. dumka, Kiev, 1985) [in Russian].
17. Modern geo dynamic processes and their study in connection with the problem of earthquake prediction, 92 p. (Nauk. dumka, Kiev, 1986) [in Russian].
18. Modern geo dynamic processes and prognosis, 96 p. (Nauk. dumka, Kiev, 1987) [in Russian].
19. Kharin E. P. The temporal variability of transfer functions of the earth's electromagnetic field. Geofizicheskii Zhurnal, 3 (3), 16—23 (1981) [In Russian].
20. Kharin E. P., Kusnetsova V. G., Gorodyski Yu. M., Maksimchuk V. E. Features temporal changes re-transfer function of the geomagnetic field in Transcarpathia. Geofizicheskii Zhurnal, 18 (3), 76—83 (1996) [In Russian].
21. Kharitonov O. M., Kostyuk O. P., Kutas V. V., et al. Seismicity of the Ukraine Territory. Geofizicheskii Zhurnal, 18 (1), 3—15 (1996) [In Russian].
22. Chmurev V. M., Isaev N. V., Bilichenko S. V., Stanev G. Observation by space-borne detectors of electric fields and hydromagnetic waves in the ionosphere over an Earthquake centre. Phys. Earth and Planet. Inter., 57, 100—109 (1989).
23. Davies, Baker D. M. Ionospheric effects observed around the time of the Alaskan Earthquake of March 28, 1964. J. Geophys. Res., 70 (9), 2251—2253 (1965).
24. Gokhberg M. B., Gufeld I. L., Rozhnoy A. A. et al. Study of seismic influence on the ionosphere by super long-wave probing of the Earth-ionosphere waveguide. Phys. Earth and Planet. Inter., 57, 64—67 (1989).
25. Korepanov V., Kuznetsova V., Maksymchuk V. Tectonomagnetic Investigations as ground support of space earthquake prediction experiment. Electromagnetic phenomena releted to earthquake prediction, 489— 491 (Terrapub, Tokyo, 1994).
26. Larkina V. I., Migulin V. V., Molchanov O. A. et al. Some Statistical Results on very low frequency radiowave emission in the upper ionosphere over Earthquake zones. Phys. Earth and Planet. Inter., 57, 100—109 (1989).
27. Mostovoy S., Mostovoy V. Seismic signal analysis and prediction the seismic events. Consel de l’Europe: Journees Luxembour-geoises de Jeodynnamique (79th and 80th session), 40—45 (Imprimerie Joseph Beffore, Luxembourg, 1996).
28. Mostovoy S. V., Mostovoy V. S., Osadchuk A. E. The monitoring system of ecological hazard objects. Inform. theories & application, 4 (3), 34—40 (1996).
29. Mostovoy S., Osadchuk A. Seismic dangerous areas and ecological dangerous objects. Consel de 1'Europe: Journees Luxembourgeoises de Jeodynnamique (79th and 80th session), 20—28 (Imprimerie Joseph Beffore, Luxembourg, 1996).
30. Warwick J. W. Radioastronomical techniques for the study of planetery atmospheres. Radioastronomical and satellite studies of the atmosphere, Ed. J. Aarons, P. 400 (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1963).

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.