Source: https://www.georgiafederalcriminallawyerblog.com/frazier_eleventh_circuit_rejec/
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 20:09:59+00:00

Document:
The Eleventh Circuit disagreed. Under pre-Bonner v. City of Prichard precedent, the Fifth Circuit upheld the § 922(a)(6) conviction of a defendant who had provided a false address in connection with the purchase of a firearm in U.S. v. Grudger. Grudger noted that the sale of a firearm is unlawful under § 922(b)(5) unless the seller records the name, age, and place of residence of the purchaser. Therefore, providing a false address is a misrepresentation that is material to the lawfulness of the sale. For this reason, the Eleventh Circuit held in Frazier that the misrepresentation violated § 922(b)(5) and, correspondingly, § 922(a)(6), even though the actual purchaser was eligible to purchase firearms.
The opinion in U.S. v. Frazier is available here.

References: v. 
 § 922
 v. 
 § 922
 § 922
 § 922
 v.