Source: http://www.legalgist.com/holmes-dissent-lochner-york-1905-case
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 11:01:19+00:00

Document:
Q: What was Holmes’ dissent on Lochner v. New York (1905) case?
Dissent (Holmes): refused to indulge any assessment of legislative goals or means. Holmes believed this Lochner-type substantive due process review allowed courts the opportunity to second-guess legislative judgments. The court substitutes its own social and economic theories.
What's Your Answer to "What was Holmes’ dissent on Lochner v. New York (1905) case?"
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Supreme Court Cases and are similar to What was Holmes’ dissent on Lochner v. New York (1905) case?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What was Black’s dissent in the Griswold v. Conn (1965- J.Black)case?
What was Holmes’ dissent on Baldwin v. Missouri (1930) case?
What was the opinion of the majority in Abood’s case?
What was the holding in the case Maryland v. Craig ?
What is Holmes dissent of free speech?
What is the O’Connor Dissent?
Briefly give an outline on the 3 Part Test.
What process is due in case of Administrative Adjudication?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.