Source: http://texas-opinions.com/08-In-re-Poly-America-Tex-2008-Dissent-by-Brister-arbitration-propriety-of-mandamus-relief.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 18:19:21+00:00

Document:
those matters either. To that extent, I respectfully dissent.
“hesitant” about it. Apparently, so long as one expresses qualms, Palacios is a dead letter.
departing from Palacios is neither prudent nor appropriate for at least five reasons.
review. And now that mandamus review is concluded, the parties must go to arbitration anyway.
hard to see how any arbitration cannot be stopped in its tracks by alleging unconscionability.
review if the resulting order can be ignored?
an improper way to circumvent these restrictions.
addressed it. We should do the same here.
stripping provisions will be unfair to Luna at all.
opposite of what Congress and the Texas Legislature intended.
arbitration (which employees rarely request) and punitive damages (which they rarely get).
matters either. To that extent, I respectfully dissent.
 221 S.W.3d 564, 566 (Tex. 2006) (emphasis added).
 Id. at 565 (noting abrogation of Freis v. Canales, 877 S.W.2d 283, 284 (Tex. 1994)).
 531 U.S. 79, 87 n.2 (2000).
(“The decision whether to grant mandamus is largely prudential.”); In re Atlantic Pipe Corp., 304 F.3d 135, 140 (1st Cir.
 Green Tree Fin. Corp.-Ala. v. Randolph, 531 U.S. 79, 86 (2000) (construing 9 U.S.C. § 16) (emphasis added).
 See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 171.098; In re Palacios, 221 S.W.3d 564, 566 (Tex. 2006).
in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”).
H. Cone Mem’l Hosp. v. Mercury Constr. Corp., 460 U.S. 1, 22 (1983)) (internal quotations omitted).
642, 649 (Tex. 2007); Lawrence v. CDB Servs., Inc., 44 S.W.3d 544, 553 (Tex. 2001).
 See 9 U.S.C. §§ 9–11; Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code §§ 171.087–171.088, 171.091.
 Hall St. Assocs., L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., ___ U.S. ___, ___, 128 S.Ct. 1396, 1404 (2008).
 ___ S.W.3d at ___, ___, ___, & ___.
 80 S.W.3d 566, 572 (citing Rembert v. Ryan’s Family Steak Houses, Inc., 596 N.W.2d 208, 226 (Mich. Ct. App. 1999)).
 PDK Labs. Inc. v. U.S. D.E.A., 362 F.3d 786, 799 (D.C. Cir. 2004) (Roberts, J., concurring).
Lloyds Subscribing to Memorandum of Ins. No. 104207, 981 F.2d 744 (5th Cir. 1993).
 See Adam Borstein, Arbitrary Enforcement: When Arbitration Agreements Contain Unlawful Provisions, 39 Loy. L.A. L.
Allow Contract Law to Administer Civil Rights Remedies? Casenote on Haskins v. Prudential Insurance Co., 2003 L. Rev.
claims among the circuit courts . . . .”).
employees can be compelled to arbitrate statutory claims.”).
 Douglas v. U.S. Dist. Court, 495 F.3d 1062, 1068-69 (9th Cir. 2007).

References: v. 
 v. 
 § 16
 § 171
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.