Source: http://mevriz.ru/eng/annotations/2013/4/
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 14:04:06+00:00

Document:
This study presents a methodology for assessing innovative development based on the concept of integration. The authors have developed a system of indicators. Tested method of calculating the level of innovative development based on harmonic analysis. The study shows a graphic representation of the results of the analysis. A quantitative indicator of the scale of transfer of innovation development in the qualitative characteristics is developed.
Keywords: integration and matrix concept, the development of innovative enterprises, harmonic analysis, assessment of innovative development.
1. Barancheev V.P., Maslennikova N.P., Mishin V.M. Upravlenie innovaciyami: uchebnik. – M.: Izdatel'stvo Yurait, 2011.
2.Glaz'ev S.Yu. Strategiya operezhayushego razvitiya Rossii v usloviyah global'nogo krizisa. – M.: Ekonomika, 2010.
3. Indikatory innovacionnoi deyatel'nosti: 2012: stat. sb. – M.: NIU «Vysshaya shkola ekonomiki». 2012; World Economic Forum (WEF). –The Global Competitiveness Report, 2011–2012.
4. Innovacionnoe razvitie: ekonomika, intellektual'nye resursy, upravlenie znaniyami / Pod red. B.Z. Mil'nera. – M.: INFRA-M, 2010.
5. Kir'yakov A.G., Maksimov V.A. Osnovy innovacionnogo predprinimatel'stva: Uchebnoe posobie. – Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 2002.
6. Kleiner G.B. Novaya institucional'naya ekonomika: na puti k «sverhnovoi» // Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta. Tom 4, №1, 2006. S. 113-122.
7. Levanova N.E. Razrabotka metodiki ocenki innovacionnoi aktivnosti personala organizacii// Molodoi uchenyi. 2011. – №5. T.1. – S. 203-206.
8. Prokesh S. Upravlyat' izmeneniyami. Receptyot GE // Harvard Business Review Rossiya, №8 (50), Avgust 2009.
9. Reutov A.Yu. Razrabotka metodiki kompleksnoi ocenki innovacionnoi aktivnosti organizacii // «Upravlenie ekonomicheskimi sistemami» – № 34. – 10/2011.
10. Samochkin V.N., Timofeeva O.A., Kalyukin A.A. Ocenka innovacionnyh vozmozhnostei predpriyatiya i ih ispol'zovanie pri formirovanii dolgosrochnyh planov razvitiya // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2002. №6. – S. 12-21.
11. Tatarkin A.I. Innovacionnoe razvitie Rossii: ot politicheskih prizyvov k antikrizisnym deistviyam // Sovremennye tendencii razvitiya biznesa i biznes-obrazovaniya v Rossii: materialy Mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferencii (18–19 marta 2010 g.) / pod redakciei V.P. Gorshenina. – Chelyabinsk: Izdatel'skii centr YuUrGU, 2010. S. 3-14.
12. Fathutdinov R.A. Innovacionnyi menedzhment: uchebnik dlya vuzov. 6-e izd. SPb.: Piter, 2011.
Problems of innovative activity of the Russian enterprises are considered, the factors interfering with the introduction of innovations on practice are given. “Wheels of innovation” for introduction in the activity practice of enterprises is proposed, the organizational and management mechanisms supporting its unceasing “rotation”.
Keywords: innovation, idea, development, system innovations, manager-innovator, intellectual capital.
2. Innovacionnaya aktivnost' krupnogo biznesa v Rossii. Issledovanie Rossiiskoi ekono-micheskoi shkoly, Pricewaterhouse Coopers v Ros-sii i Centra tehnologii i innovacii PwC // Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta. 2010. Tom 8. № 4.
3. Strategiya innovacionnogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federacii na period do 2020 goda. – M.: Minekonomrazvitiya Rossii 2010.
4. Linn G., Reilli R. Blokbastery. Sensacionnye produkty – put' k uspehu. M.: AST: Tranzitkniga, 2005.
5. Medovnikov D. Tiho techet reka po ravnine // Ekspert. 2002. №17.
6. Korobeinikov O.P., Trifilova A.A., Korshunov I.A. // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2000. №3.
7. Chelovecheskii faktor korporativnoi kul'tury // Personal-Miks. 2004. №3.
8. Fashiev H.A. Intellektual'nyi kapital – osnova innovacionnogo razvitiya predpriyatiya // Innovacii. 2011. №6. S.31 – 44.
9. Innovation 2009. Making Hard Decisions in the Downturn. A BCG Senior Management Survey. BCG, April 2009.
10. Gurova T., Ivanter A. My nichego ne proizvodim // Ekspert. 2012. №47. S. 19 – 26.
11. Fashiev H.A. Prinyatie marketingovyh reshenii na osnove kolichestvennoi ocenki ob'ektov // Marketing v Rossii i za rubezhom. 2010. №5. S. 6 – 14.
12. Fashiev H.A. «Vorota konkurentosposobnosti» - novyi aspekt proektirovaniya ATS // Avtomobil'naya promyshlennost'. 2008. №12. S. 1 – 4.
13. Fashiev H.A. Upravlenie konkurentosposobnost'yu tovara na etape razrabotki // Problemy teorii i praktiki upravleniya. 2009. №8. S.79 – 86.
In this article are represented the different views on the definition of the objects of internal audit. The author identifies the features of holdings, influencing the formation of the main group of the objects of internal audit in such organization structures. The author’s hierarchical system of objects of internal audit, functioning in holdings is proposed.
1. Sokolov, B.N. Vnutrennij audit i kontrol': organizacija, metodiki, praktika. – M.: Buhgalterskij uchet, 2010.
2. Shichkov, N.A. Vnutrennij audit sistemy menedzhmenta: uchebnoe posobie. – SPb.: UMC «Biznes Klass», 2009.
3. Ivanova, T.A. Vnutrennij audit i revizija: shodstva i // Vestnik professional'nyh buhgalterov. – 2011. – №2.
4. Pugachev, V.V. Vnutrennij audit i kontrol'. – M.: Delo i servis, 2010.
5. Makal'skaja, A.K. Vnutrennij audit: uchebno-prakticheskoe posobie. – M.: Delo i Servis, 2001.
6. Sheremet, A.D., Sujc V.P. Audit: uchebnoe posobie. – M.: Vysshee obrazovanie, 2007.
7. Lejkin, D. Kljuchevye voprosy upravlenija gruppoj kompanij. – M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2012.
8. Bogataja, I.N., Hahonova, N.N. Buhgalterskij finansovyj uchet. Uchebnik. – M.: KnoRus, 2011.
9. Burcev, V.V. Vnutrennij audit kompanii: voprosy organizacii i upravlenija // Finansovyj menedzhment. – 2003. – №4.
10. Krasnova, I.A. Metodika provedenija vnutrennej auditorskoj proverki jeffektivnosti sistemy vnutrennego kontrolja biznes-processov. Institut vnutrennih auditorov. http://www.iia-ru.ru.
11. Sonin, A.M. Zachem kompanii vnutrennij audit? // Upravlenie kompaniej. – 2009. – №1.
12. Hahonova, N.N. Metodologicheskie podhody k sozdaniju sluzhby vnutrennego audita v organizacii // Finansy i uchet. – M., 2012. – № 1 (14).
13. Hahonova, N.N. Metodika proverki i ocenki dejatel'nosti sluzhby vnutrennego audita proverjaemogo sub’ekta // Uchet i statistika. – Rostov na-Donu, 2007. – № 8.
14. Ocenka investicionnyh proektov. http://business-prognoz.ru/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/.
In article the cores of problems of formation of dynamic capabilities which are sources of competitive advantages are considered. The bases of formation of dynamic capabilities are shown, process of their formation taking into account organizational capabilities and core competences is given.
Keywords: dynamic capabilities, core competences, strategic partnership.
1. Teece D.J., Pisano,G.P. and Shuen A. Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. //Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18, pp. 509-533.
2. Kat'kalo V.S. Evolyuciya teorii strategicheskogo upravleniya. – SPb.: ID SPb Gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 2000.
3. Kleiner G.B. Ot teorii predpriyatiya k teorii strategicheskogo upravleniya //Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta, 2003, №1. - S.31-56.
4. Teece, D. J. 2009. Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management: Organizing for Innovation and Growth. Oxford University Press.
5. McGuinness T., Morgan R.E. 2003. “Organizational change capability: the theoretical construct and its operational measurement”. Developments in Marketing Science, Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science Conference, Washington DC, USA.
6. Shumpeter '. Istoriya ekonomicheskogo analiza - SPb.: Ekonomicheskaya shkola, 2004.
7. Tambovcev V.L.. Strategicheskaya teoriya firmy: sostoyanie i vozmozhnoe razvitie // Rossiiskii zhurnal menedzhmenta. Tom 8, №1, 2010. S.5-40.
10. Bower, J.L. Managing the Resource Allocation Process: A Study of Corporate Planning and Investment. Harvard University, Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration: Boston. 1970.
11. Burgelman R.A. 1983.A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. // Administrative Science Quarterly 28 (2): pp. 223-244.
12. Prahalad K.K., Krishnan M.S. Prostranstvo biznes-innovacii: Sozdanie cennosti s potrebitelem. – M.: Al'pina Pablisher, 2012.
13. Hemel G. Vo glave revolyucii: Kak dobit'sya uspeha v turbulentnye vremena, prevrativ innovacii v obraz zhizni.- BestBusinessBooks, 2007.
Using the strategy of diversification of industrial activities at the current stage of development of the Russian economy is an effective way to increase the efficiency of their operation. In this article, the author identified the main reasons for and benefits of the strategy related and unrelated diversification. Have been classified with respect to the diversification of industry taking into account the trends in the external environment.
Keywords: diversification, product portfolio, sales, strategy, target costs are, and integration.
1. Tompson-ml. Artur A., Striklend III A. Dzh. Strategicheskii menedzhment. Koncepcii i situacii dlya analiza. - M.: ID «Vil'yams», 2006.
2. Kriskevich S.N. Strategicheskii menedzhment: Uchebnoe posobie. - Tomsk: kafedra TU, TUSUR, 2012.
3. Moskalenko A. V. Logisticheskaya strategiya diversifikacii kommercheskoi deyatel'nosti: dis. kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05 – Spb, 1998 g.
4. Boicov A. S. Diversifikaciya agrarnoi ekonomiki v usloviyah perehodnogo perioda: dis. kand. ekon. nauk: 08.00.05 – Velikii Novgorod, 2000 g.
5. Polidi A. A. Diversifikaciya kak dominiruyushaya bazovaya strategiya razvitiya rossiiskoi promyshlennosti v usloviyah globalizacii ekonomicheskih otnoshenii : dis. dokt. ekon. nauk : 08.00.05 - Krasnodar, 2005 g.
6. Shevchuk D. Strategicheskii menedzhment: Uchebnoe posobie. - Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 2006.
1.Strategiya innovacionnogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federacii na period do 2020 goda, utverzhdennaya rasporyazheniem Pravitel'stva Rossiiskoi Federacii ot 8 dekabrya 2011 g. № 2227-r.
In article public audit as the instrument of procurement directed on ensuring the maximum transparency of actions of power structures.
Keywords: public audit, procurement, transparency, corruption.
4. Rasporyazhenie Pravitel'stva RF ot 17.11.2008 № 1662-r «O Koncepcii dolgosrochnogo social'no-ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossiiskoi Federacii na period do 2020 goda» // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. - 24.11.2008. – № 47. - st. 5489.
One of important tasks of management of mineral resources at the national and regional level is the economic evaluation of fields corresponding to modern market conditions. Use of data of the entities analogs and the integrated indicators in case of calculations can result in the inaccuracies exceeding an admissible interval. Therefore we offer an economic evaluation of investment appeal of development with use of the parameters considering features of each specific field, on method of expert evaluations.
1 Technique of geological and economic revaluation of fields of firm minerals (on the integrated indicators). M, VIEMS, 2002.
3. Tolkachyov A.I.Predvaritelnaya geological economic evaluation of geological objects of the Bryansk region attractive to investment. Kaluga, VIEMS, 2000.
In present article, the differences are shown between characteristics of various organizational structures, which can be used in organizations that undertake project based work. Those types and characteristics of organizational structures are considered, which are defined in Project Management Body of Knowledge Guide (hereafter PMBOK v5) by Project Management Institute (hereafter PMI). In addition to the characteristics pointed out in PMBOK, in present article we consider a number of significant characteristics, which inevitably should be taken into account when building organizational structures for organizations which undertake project based work.
Keywords: organizational structure, project management, PMBOK, methods and tools.
1. Clifford F., Larson E. «Project Management: The Managerial Process», M.:«Delo i Servis», 2007.
2. Mishin S.A. «Project business : adapted model for Russia », M.:AST, 2006.
3. A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide) – PMI, 2012.
4. Mary Beth Chrissis, Michael D. Konrad, Sandra Shrum. CMMI for Development: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement, Third Edition. – SEI, 2011.
The development of the consumer market connects with the formation of self-regulation's institutes. The article describes the main advantages of the practice of self-regulation in comparison with government regulation. Authors give a vision of the stages of development of self-regulation on the Russian consumer market and make the conclusion that the role of self-regulatory organizations will increase in shaping the rules of work in the trade industry in the next five years.
The publication presents original methods and management model developed by the author of her and different from the other to improve the quality of educational services by improving not only the management systems and the management system of continuous education as a whole, but also their individual levels.
Keywords: management level, educational services, continuing education.
1. K.E. Pisarenko, N.I. Eliseev, V.Zh. Kvitko / pod red. R.G. Sharafieva. Innovacionnoe obrazovatel'noe uchrezhdenie po standartu JIS/TRQ 0005:2005: kompleksnyi podhod k innovaciyam. – Ufa: GOU «Respublikanskii uchebno-nauchnyi metodicheskii centr Minobrazovaniya Respubliki Bashkortostan», 2009.
2 K.E. Pisarenko, R.G. Sharafiev. Podhody k obespecheniyu kachestva menedzhmenta obrazovatel'nyh uslug/ Monografiya / Ufa: RIO RUNMC MO RB, 2011.
3 L.Yu. Grigor'ev, M.S. Krupina, K.E. Pisarenko. Struktura upravleniya processami v sisteme menedzhmenta kachestva VUZa. // «DASManagement», g. Makeevka (Ukraina), №1, 2012. Str. 75-82.
4 Opredelenie Sovershenstva. Buklet – voprosnik s 50 voprosami na osnove devyati kriteriev Modeli Sovershenstva EFQM. Prostoe rukovodstvo dlya organizacii pervoi samoocenki/ EFQM, 1999.
5 K.E. Pisarenko. Sovershenstvovanie sistemy menedzhmenta kachestva na osnove sistemy menedzhmenta znanii. // «Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom», №2, 2012, str. 59–66.
6 K.E. Pisarenko, V.Zh. Kvitko, R.G. Sharafiev. Uluchshenie kachestva menedzhmenta vysshego obrazovaniya s pomosh'yu modeli Sovershenstva EFQM. // «DASManagement», g. Makeevka (Ukraina), №4, 2011. Str. 45-49.
7 K.E. Pisarenko, R.G. Sharafiev. Analiz i uluchshenie kachestva menedzhmenta vysshego obrazovaniya s pomosh'yu Modeli delovogo Sovershenstva EFQM. // Mezhdunarodnyi tehniko-ekonomicheskii zhurnal №4, 2011. str. 62–67.
8 K.E. Pisarenko. Razvitie sistemy nepreryvnogo obrazovaniya na osnove sistem menedzhmenta kachestva ee uchastnikov. // «Kachestvo. Innovacii. Obrazovanie», №2, Moskva, 2012.
9 IEEESTD 830-1993. Rekomendacii IEEE po razrabotke trebovanii k programmnomu obespecheniyu.
Keywords: efficiency, electronic product model aircraft manufacturer, IT-solutions.
1.An'shin V.M. Dagaeva A.A. Innovacionnyi menedzhment: Koncepcii, mnogourovnevye strategii i mehanizmy innovacionnogo razvitiya. M.: Delo, 2007.
2.Bendikov M. A. Ocenka realizuemosti innovacionnogo proekta // Menedzhment v Rossii i za rubezhom, 2001, № 2.
3.Varshavskii A. E. Naukoemkie otrasli i vysokie tehnologii: opredeleniya, pokazateli, tehnicheskaya politika, udel'nyi ves v strukture ekonomiki Rossii // Ekonomicheskaya nauka sovremennoi Rossii, 2000, №2.
4.Pravik Yu.M. Іnvestic³inii menedzhment: Navch. pos³bnik. K.: Znannya, 2007.
5.Cai T. N., Grabovyi P. G., Saiel M. B. Konkurenciya i upravlenie riskami na predpriyatiyah v usloviyah rynka. M.: Alans, 1997.
6.Kompaniya «Suhoi». Vneshnii Internet-resur KB[Elektronnyi resurc]. – Rezhim dostupa:http://www.sukhoi.org. Data obrasheniya: 20.03.2013.
7.Otkrytye sistemy. Zhurnal setevyh reshenii «LAN» [Elektronnyi resurc]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.osp.ru/cw/2002/22/53191. Data obrasheniya: 20.03.2013.
8.Akademiya bezopasnosti otkrytogo obshestva [Elektronnyi resurc]. – Rezhim dostupa: http:// aoss.org.ua/cgi-bin/ruindex.pl?page=amat&id=784. Data obrasheniya 20.03.2013.
9.General'nyi Direktor. Delovoe analiticheskoe izdanie [Elektronnyi resurc]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://director.com.ua/reitingi-i-statistika/realii-i-perspektivy-aviastroeniya-ukrainy784. Data obrasheniya: 22.03.2013.
10.Vikipediya. Otkrytaya enciklopediya [Elektronnyi resurc]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/PDM-sistema. Data obrasheniya: 22.02.2013.
11.Gol'dshteig G.Ya. Trudy po strategicheskomu menedzhmentu KB [Elektronnyi resurc]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://www.aup.ru/authors/goldshtein. Data obrasheniya: 22.02.2013.
12. OAO «Tupolev». Rezhim dostupa: http://www.tupolev.ru/Russian/Show.asp?SectionID=74–otkrytyi. Data obrasheniya: 22.02.2013.
13. Edelheit L.S. GE’s R&D strategy: be vital // RTM, 1998, v. 41, № 2.
14. Armbrecht F.M. R. Jr., Chapas R.B., Chappelow C.C., Farris G.F., Friga P.N., Hartz C.A., McIlvaine M.E., Postle S.R., Whitwell G.E. Knowledge Management in Research and Development//RTM, 2001, v. 44, № 4.
15. Carter R., Edwards D. Financial Analysis Extends Management of R&D // RTM, 2001, v. 44, № 5.
16. Breadly R., Myers S. Principles of Corporate Finance. N.Y.: McGraw-Hill, 1996.
17. Gibbons J.R. Keynote address. Washington DC: ONR, 1996.
18. Carter R. Financial analysis for R&D decisions // Journal of the Society of Research Administrators, 1997, v. 29, № 1, 2.
19. Djankov S., Murrell P. Enterprise restructuring in transition: A quantitative survey //Journal of Economic, 2002.
20. McGlenahen J.S. 15 survival strategies for new millenium // Industry Week, 2009, v. 241, № 17.
21. Markides C. Strategic Innovation in Established Companies // Sloan Man. Review, 2008, v. 39, № 3.
The development of production is always changing it, but not all changes can be considered as development. In practice, the task is to distinguish one from the other. Offering a solution to this problem has been used info of the change in the entropy of the system as an indicator of development. Proved that the criterion of not the increase of entropy consistent with both the increase performance of production so and reducing one, depending on the current state of organization and the position it on market. Targeted changes aimed at increasing effect of the company through extensive production growth are not meeting the criteria of development.
Keywords: Industrial Organization, socio-technical system, entropy, performance, attractor.
1. Byk F.L., Kitushin V.G. Mechanisms for the development and management of them // Management in Russia and abroad.-2008.-№4. p. 3 - 9.
2. Byk F.L., Kitushin V.G. Conceptual model of development and management problem // Management in Russia and abroad.-2008.-№6. p. 3 - 8.
3. Byk F.L., Kitushin V.G. Conceptual model of management of development // Management in Russia and abroad.-2009 – № 4. – p.112 - 118.
4. Great Encyclopedic Dictionary / Ed. A.N.Azriliyana. - 4th ed. ext. and rev. - M.: Institute of the New Economy, 1999.
5. Terminological dictionary by electricity. - M.: Typography "KEM", 2008.
7. Matveeva E.Y. Concepts of modern science. Glossary of key terms. Textbook of SIBSUTISS - Novosibirsk, 2007.
The article presents the structure of the elements of the economic potential of the insurance organization as a complex organization of existing resources and opportunities for their use. The methods of a comprehensive assessment of the economic potential based on the desirability function Harrington. The method allows for the quantitative assessment of intangible components of the economic potential of the insurance company.
Keywords: insurance organization, structure, labor potential, financial potential, investment potential, the scale of desirability, the evaluation of the economic potential.
2. Yarockii I.V. Metodicheskii podhod k ocenke finansovogo potenciala strahovoi organizacii // Vestnik TGEU. 2012. –№3. S. 55-63.
3. Ahnazarova S.L.. Ispol'zovanie funkcii zhelatel'nosti Harringtona pri reshenii optimizacionnyh zadach himicheskoi tehnologii. – M.: RHTU im. D.S. Mendeleeva. 2003.
7. Orlov A.I. Organizacionno-ekonomicheskoe modelirovanie. M.: Izd-vo MGTU im. N.E. Baumana. – 2011. Ch. 2: Ekspertnye ocenki.
1. Ivanov A.V. Innovation as a mechanism for the viability of the industrial business/Creative economy, 2012, № 7, p. 71-75.
2. Stewart Т. Brainpower: Intellectual capital // Fortune Magazine. 03.06.1991.Vol.123. №11.
3. Stewart T. Intellectual capital. The New Wealth of Organizations. N.Y.-L., 1997. P. X. Cited in:V. L. Inozemtsev. Outside of the economic society. - M.: Academia-Science, 1998 - with. 340.
4. Edvinsson L. Corporate longitude. Navigation in the knowledge-based economy. -M.:INFRA-M, 2005.
5. Edvinsson L., Sullivan P. Developing a model for managing intellectual capital //European management journal. 1996. Vol.14. № 4. P. 356–364.
7. Nikolaev O.V. The development of personnel potential of the military-industrial complex of Russia: methodology and practice: dis... d-RA economic science, 08.00.05, M., 2005.
8. Falcman V.K. Staff training for production and active use of technically sophisticated products.//Creative economy, 2012, №5. 30-37.
11. Orlova T. Intellectual capital: concept, essence, types/ Problems of theory and practice of management, 2008, № 4, p.109-119.
12. Bondarenko N. Peculiarities of the personnel policy of «crisis period 2008-2010.//Vestnik public opinion, 2010, . – № 4, p.73-90.
The article describes the experience of building the system of personnel management in subsidiary companies in the international banking group VTB. The headcount and the structure of the staff in the banking group are analysed by the start of the work concerning the changes of the personnel management group. The current system of the governance of the banking group is regarded and the reasons led to the necessity of the changes are marked out. The new personnel management system of the international banking group VTB (its objectives, principles of distribution of powers, formed governments), which was formed as a result is described in the article.
In this article we develop a classification of knowledge sharing barriers, using existing studies and theoretical approaches to knowledge sharing problems. We develop original methodological tool to assess the knowledge sharing barriers in organization and present the results of empirical study in medical clinics in which the tool was tested. Based on the results of empirical study we formulate directions for future research, as well as recommendations for managers in healthcare.
1. Nonaka I. The Knowledge-Creating Company. Harvard Business Review, 1991. 69 (6): p. 96–104.
2. Davenport T.H. Working knowledge: how organizations manage what they know/Thomas H. Davenport, Laurence Prusak, ed. L. Prusak. 1998, Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
3. Quinn J.B., Anderson P., Finkelstein S. Leveraging intellect. Academy of Management Executive, 2005. 19 (4): p. 78–94.
4. Husted K., Michailova S. Diagnosing and fighting knowledge-sharing hostility. Organizational Dynamics, 2002. 31 (1): p. 60–73.
5. Cabrera A., Collins W.C., Salgado J.F. Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 2006. 17 (2): p. 245–264.
6. Andreeva T., Yurtaikin E. Human resources development practices as a key tool to attract, motivate and retain knowledge workers. in «Conference on HRM and Knowledge-Related Performance: the nature, the outcomes and the linkages». 2006: Copenhagen Business School, Denmark.
7. Everitt B., Dunn G. Applied multivariate data analysis. 1991: E. Arnold.
8. Dean B. Learning from prescribing errors. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 2002. 11 (3): p. 258–260.
9. Nicolini D., et al. Managing knowledge in the healthcare sector: a review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2008. 10 (3): p. 245–263.
10. Osterloh M., Frey B.S. Motivation, Knowledge Transfer, and Organizational Forms. Organization Science, 2000. 11 (5): p. 538–550.
Article continues a subject lifted by the author in two previous publications in the magazine «Management v Rossii i za rubezhom», numbers 2010, No. 1 and 2012, No. 1. In a cycle of articles the relations of civil society and the state from a position of modern ideas of corporate management are investigated. Within the present article the question of an assessment of quality of these social institutes is considered.
1. Denisov V. Civil society, state and Management // Management v Rossii i za rubezhom. – 2010. – № 1.
2. Denisov V. Civil society as a mechanism for self-identification of the civil society // Management v Rossii i za rubezhom. -– 2012. – № 1.
3. Constitution of the Russian Federation, 1993.
4. Federal Law of 26.12.1995 N 208-FZ (as amended on 12.29.2012) "On Joint Stock Companies"

References: V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V. 
 V.