Source: https://ads1.morelaw.com/verdicts/case.asp?n=16-6252/6360&s=KY&d=117161
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 08:12:00+00:00

Document:
Defendant's Attorney: Lowell V. Sturgill, Jr.
the Estate’s funds without any advance notice or process.
which was the amount of his pension benefit retroactive to June 2013.
only cash asset—and deposited the $8,660 into an escrow account for the Estate.
was not entitled to the benefits owed to him at the time of his death. See 38 U.S.C. § 5121(a).
when it received a letter from the bank—that its account had been drained of funds.
motion for attorneys’ fees, which the court denied. The parties then brought these appeals.
government removed this case under § 1442, so we have jurisdiction here.
437, 442 (6th Cir. 2017).
official or by any court[.]” Id. § 511(a).
and thus reviewable only under the regime described above. Id. § 511(a); see also Beamon v.
under the exclusive process set forth in the Review Act.
be deprived except pursuant to constitutionally adequate procedures.” Cleveland Bd. of Educ. v.
government money—again without advance notice or process of any kind. Oral Arg. at 8:59.
reach it, though the Estate should be free to raise it in future litigation.
jurisdiction under the Review Act). True, as our dissenting colleague points out, 28 U.S.C.
court’s order denying its motion for attorneys’ fees is moot.
ground that the district court was required to remand because § 511(a) divested it of jurisdiction.
See Soehnlen v. Fleet Owners Ins. Fund., 844 F.3d 576, 586 n.5 (6th Cir. 2016).

References: V. 
 § 5121
 § 1442
 § 511
 § 511
 v.

 v.

 § 511
 v.