Source: https://daymonely.com/news-updates/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 18:39:00+00:00

Document:
Ely, Daymon. “Developments in Legal Malpractice.” The New Mexico Trial Lawyer May/June 2012: Vol. 43 No. 3.
Ely, Daymon. “Survey Results. What About Them?” New Mexico Lawyer May 2012: Vol. 7 No. 2.
Ely, Daymon. “State Can Lead Way On Transportation.” Editorial. Albuquerque Journal 31 July 2011.
Ely, Daymon. “New Mexico Common Law Developments in the Area of Professional Liability.” Albuquerque Torts Seminar. April 2011.
Ely, Daymon and Bill Gilstrap. “Attorney Advertising’s Pernicious Effects.” Editorial. Albuquerque Journal 21 March 2011.
Sandlin, Scott. “Jury Awards $33 Million In Lawyer Fight.” Albuquerque Journal 7 February 2008.
“Chairman Ely Will Be Missed.” Editorial. Albuquerque Journal 1 January 2005.
Akers, Joshua. “Train Plan Puts Sandoval on Gov.’s Express.” Albuquerque Journal 25 November 2004.
Note: these are NOT articles but rather, legal decisions in New Mexico in which Daymon Ely was the plaintiff’s attorney in the cases.
WALTER F. SMITH, III V. WILL DURDEN, DENISE DURDEN, No. 32,594 (N.M. 03/05/2012).
SMITH V. DURDEN, 2010-NMCA-097 (N.M.App. 08/23/2010).
DEMIR V. FARMERS TEXAS COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO., 140 P.3d 1111, 140 N.M. 162 (N.M.App. 06/28/2006).
CELNIK V. CONGREGATION B’NAI ISRAEL, 131 P.3d 102, 139 N.M. 252 (N.M.App. 02/06/2006).
MEIBOOM V. CARMODY, 134 N.M. 699, 82 P.3d 66, 2003 -NMCA- 145 (N.M.App. 10/22/2003).
ANDREW V. SAYLOR, 134 N.M. 545, 80 P.3d 482, 2003 -NMCA- 132, 2003-NMCA-132 (N.M.App. 09/25/2003).
TERCERO V. ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORWICH, CONNECTICUT, 48 P.3d 50, 2002 -NMSC- 018, 2002-NMSC-018 (N.M. 05/23/2002).
MEIBOOM V. WATSON, No. 2000-NMSC-2000 (N.M. 01/12/2000).
TERCERO V. ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF NORWICH, 127 N.M. 294, 980 P.2d 77, 1999-NMCA-052 (N.M.App. 02/09/1999).
SUGG V. ALBUQUERQUE PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT, No. 1999-NMCA-111 (N.M.App. 06/23/1999).
MEIBOOM V. WATSON, 125 N.M. 462, 963 P.2d 539 (N.M.App. 05/08/1998).
ST. JOSEPH HOSPITAL, 122 N.M. 524, 928 P.2d 250 (N.M. 07/22/1996).
WILLIAMS V. ASHBAUGH, 120 N.M. 731, 906 P.2d 263 (N.M.App. 07/24/1995).
IN RE ADOPTION OF J. J. B., 119 N.M. 638, 894 P.2d 994, 34 N.M. St. B. Bull. 21 (N.M. 03/30/1995).
ROBERTS V. SOUTHWEST COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES, 114 N.M. 248, 837 P.2d 442 (N.M. 07/14/1992).
ROMERO V. STATE, 112 N.M. 291, 814 P.2d 1019 (N.M.App. 04/16/1991).
CALIFORNIA FIRST BANK V. STATE, 111 N.M. 64, 801 P.2d 646 (N.M. 11/28/1990).
ROMERO V. NEW MEXICO HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENT DEPARTMENT, 107 N.M. 516, 760 P.2d 1282 (N.M. 09/08/1988).
ASHBAUGH V. WILLIAMS, 106 N.M. 598, 747 P.2d 244 (N.M. 12/18/1987).
SMITH V. ASHBY, 106 N.M. 358, 743 P.2d 114 (N.M. 09/28/1987).
LUCERO V. SUTTEN – not yet published – legal malpractice case. Making clear that doctrines, such as independent intervening cause, should be given the same weight (or lack thereof) in legal malpractice cases.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.