Source: http://texas-opinions.com/law-WBA.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 18:19:50+00:00

Document:
violation of law to appropriate law-enforcement agency, sufficiency of pleaded jurisdictional allegations).
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and dismisses the case.
authority is a jurisdictional question.
law-enforcement authority is a jurisdictional question. Therefore, without hearing oral argument, Tex. R. App. P.
THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER AT DALLAS v. LARRY M. GENTILELLO, M.
oral argument, the Court reverses the court of appeals’ judgment and remands the case to that court.
and the procedure had been pre-approved by the state auditor's office.
agency, (3) Texas Tech did deny Phelan his due process rights, and (4) did deprive him of his "liberty interests"
in violation of Article 1, § 19 of the Texas Constitution. We affirm.
reappointment. Our decision pretermits consideration of whether an assault of the person is a "violation of law"
as contemplated by the Act. Tex. R. App. P. 47.1. Point of error one is overruled.
who report illegal activity and enhance openness in government while compelling compliance with the law.
Castaneda v. Texas Dep't of Agriculture, 831 S.W.2d 501, 503 (Tex.App.-Corpus Christi 1992, writ denied).
authority is a question of law to be decided by the court. City of Fort Worth v. DeOreo, 114 S.W.3d 664, 668 (Tex.
App.-Fort Worth 2003, no pet.).
making the report. County of Bexar v. Steward, 139 S.W.3d 354, 357-58 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2004, no pet.).
criminal law." Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 554.002(b) (Vernon 2004).
employee's training and experience. Texas Dep't of Transportation v. Needham, 82 S.W.3d 314, 321 (Tex.
2002). See Duvall, 82 S.W.3d at 480-81.
Tech's decision to non-reappoint him.
Diana Castillo, and Reynaldo Garay. We affirm.

References: v. 
 § 19
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 554
 v.