Source: https://stephendhebert.com/index.php/Uncategorised/seizure-of-license-circumstances-temporary-license-r-s-32-667.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 02:22:36+00:00

Document:
(1)(a) Repealed by Acts 2009, No. 288, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2009.
(c)(i) Two years from the date of suspension on the second and subsequent refusal occurring within five years of the date of a refusal to submit to the test.
(ii) Two years from the date of suspension on the second and subsequent refusal occurring within five years of the date of a refusal to submit to the test, without the benefit of eligibility for a hardship license in the event that a fatality occurred or a person sustained serious bodily injury as a result of an accident and the person's intoxication is determined by a trier of fact to be the contributing factor of the fatality or serious bodily injury.
(4) Repealed by Acts 2009, No. 288, § 2, eff. Sept. 1, 2009.
D. (1) Upon receipt of a request for an administrative hearing, the Department of Public Safety and Corrections shall issue a document extending the temporary license, which shall remain in effect until the completion of administrative suspension, revocation, or cancellation proceedings. The Department of Public Safety and Corrections shall forward the record of the case to the division of administrative law for a hearing within sixty days of the date of arrest.
H. (1) When any person's driver's license has been seized, suspended, or revoked, and the seizure, suspension, or revocation is connected to a charge or charges of violation of a criminal law, and the charge or charges do not result in a conviction, plea of guilty, or bond forfeiture, the person charged shall have his license immediately reinstated and shall not be required to pay any reinstatement fee if at the time for reinstatement of driver's license, it can be shown that the criminal charges have been dismissed or that there has been a permanent refusal to charge a crime by the appropriate prosecutor or there has been an acquittal. If, however, at the time for reinstatement, the licensee has pending against him criminal charges arising from the arrest which led to his suspension or revocation of driver's license, the reinstatement fee shall be collected. Upon subsequent proof of final dismissal or acquittal, other than under Article 893 or 894 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, the licensee shall be entitled to a reimbursement of the reinstatement fee previously paid. In no event shall exemption from this reinstatement fee or reimbursement of a reinstatement fee affect the validity of the underlying suspension or revocation.
(3) Paragraph (1) of this Subsection shall not apply to a person who refuses to submit to an approved chemical test upon a second or subsequent arrest for R.S. 14:98 or 14:98.1, or a parish or municipal ordinance that prohibits driving a motor vehicle while operating a vehicle. However, this Paragraph shall not apply if the second or subsequent arrest occurs more than ten years after the prior arrest.
(a) Any person who has refused to submit to an approved chemical test for intoxication, after being requested to do so, for a second violation of R.S. 14:98 or 98.1 or a parish or municipal ordinance that prohibits operating a vehicle while intoxicated and whose driver's license has been suspended in accordance with law.
(b) Any person who has submitted to an approved chemical test for intoxication where the results indicate a blood alcohol level of 0.08 percent or above and whose driver's license has been suspended in accordance with the law for a violation occurring within five years of the first violation.
Added by Acts 1968, No. 273, § 14. Amended by Acts 1972, No. 534, § 1; Acts 1983, No. 632, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1984; Acts 1984, No. 409, § 1; Acts 1985, No. 194, § 1, eff. July 6, 1985; Acts 1985, No. 572, § 1; Acts 1985, No. 816, § 1; Acts 1990, No. 932, § 1; Acts 1992, No. 605, § 1; Acts 1993, No. 17, § 1, eff. May 18, 1993; Acts 1993, No. 453, § 1; Acts 1994, 3rd Ex.Sess., No. 20, § 2; Acts 1995, No. 516, § 1; Acts 1995, No. 520, § 2; Acts 1995, No. 1070, § 1; Acts 1997, No. 1184, § 1; Acts 1997, No. 1296, § 3, eff. July 15, 1997; Acts 1997, No. 1297, § 1, eff. July 15, 1997; Acts 1999, No. 1212, § 1; Acts 2000, 1st Ex.Sess., No. 91, § 1; Acts 2001, No. 781, § 4, eff. Sept. 30, 2003; Acts 2001, No. 808, § 1; Acts 2003, No. 535, § 3; Acts 2003, No. 800, § 2; Acts 2007, No. 413, § 1; Acts 2008, No. 647, § 1; Acts 2009, No. 288, § 1, eff. Sept. 1, 2009; Acts 2009, No. 513, § 1; Acts 2010, No. 405, § 1, eff. Jan. 1, 2011; Acts 2010, No. 844, § 1; Acts 2012, No. 663, § 1, eff. June 7, 2012.

References: § 2
 § 2
 § 14
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 2
 § 1
 § 2
 § 1
 § 1
 § 3
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 4
 § 1
 § 3
 § 2
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1
 § 1