Source: https://www.criminallegalnews.org/cln-litigation/2016/DC/prison-legal-news-v-lappin-dc-order-bop-public-records-2010/
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 22:18:29+00:00

Document:
Order without the benefit of the Bureau’s additional arguments and supporting affidavits. Id.
Court’s March 26, 2009 Order and therefore should be awarded summary judgment. Id. at 3.
Is No Genuine Issue; the Declaration of Wilson J. Moorer, dated October 23, 2008; the Declaration of Kimberly E.
Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Judgment.
docket and that its failure to discover and cure this error was inexcusable. Pl.’s Opp’n at 5.
Therefore, the plaintiff requests that the Court deny the Bureau’s motion for reconsideration. Id.
neglect.” Lepkowski v. Dep't of Treasury, 804 F.2d 1310, 1311-12 (D.C. Cir. 1986) (citing Fed.
R. Civ. P. 60(b)(1)). Relief under Rule 60(b) is rare, Hall v. CIA, 437 F.3d 94, 99 (D.C. Cir.
2006), and turns on equitable factors, notably whether any neglect was excusable, Pioneer Inv.
only in “extraordinary circumstances.” Pioneer Inv. Servs. Co., 507 U.S. at 393.
as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed.
facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S.
doubt that its search was ‘reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents.’” ValenciaLucena v. U.S. Coast Guard, 180 F.3d 321, 325 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (citations omitted); Steinberg v.
conducted a ‘search reasonably calculated to uncover all relevant documents’”); Oglesby v.
undermine the adequacy of the search).
rebuttal. SafeCard Servs., Inc. v. SEC, 926 F.2d 1197, 1200 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (citation omitted).
standard” was insufficient. Id. (citing Morley v. CIA, 508 F.3d 1108, 1122 (D.C. Cir. 2007)).
custody today or that the [agency] had a duty under FOIA to retain the records”)).
opportunity to review the motion for reconsideration and its supporting documents.
Bureau should not be excused from simply failing to monitor the docket in this case. Id.
a reasonable degree must be provided in the supporting declaration for all individual offices.
case being handled,” see, e.g., Def.’s Mot., Ex. 14 (Declaration of Deidre J. Williams) ¶ 5.
Court to independently determine if the search was adequate, see Oglesby, 920 F.2d at 68.
that the searches were adequate, the Bureau has not justified the exemptions it seeks to invoke.
Personal and private information of BOP staff and non-BOP staff.”).
put in position where this assessment can be intelligently made.
“sweep[s] unprotected information within the statute’s reach.” Judicial Watch, 449 F.3d at 147.
SO ORDERED this 25th day of February, 2010.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v. 
 v.