Source: http://alabamaappellatewatch.com/?m=201005
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 15:59:30+00:00

Document:
Blackston v. Alabama Department of Revenue et al.
Chancy v. Chancy Lake Homeowners Association, Inc., et al.
Alabama Department of Revenue v. The National Peanut Festival Association, Inc.
J.W. v. T.D. and B.D.
Lighting and Lamp Corporation v. Athens Lofts, L.L.C.
Rice v. Chapman, as Secretary of State for the State of Alabama, et al.
Universal Debit & Credit Corporation v. LeeBerg, L.L.C.
The Court of Civil Appeals was without jurisdiction to review a custody decision in J.M.M. v. J.C., 2090172 (Ala. Civ. App. May 7, 2010), because the trial court had not resolved the issue of child support, making the judgment non-final. "Generally, an appeal will lie only from a final judgment, and if there is not a final judgment then this court is without jurisdiction to hear the appeal . . . ‘A judgment is not final if it fails to completely adjudicate all issues between the parties.’" To be final, custody decisions must include a determination of the parties’ child support obligations.
When circuit courts review administrative decisions, they must defer to the adminsitrative agency and set aside the agency’s decision only if the decision was not supported by substantial evidence, the agency’s actions were not reasonable, or the agency’s actions were not within its statutory and constitutional powers. Alabama State Personnel Board v. Dueitt, 2080899 (Ala. Civ. App. May 7, 2010). In Dueitt, the Court of Civil Appeals reversed a circuit court opinion overruling an Alabama State Personnel Board decision because "the circuit court impermissibly reweighed the evidence and substituted its judgment regarding a question of fact for the judgment of the Board.".
Jefferson County Commission et al. v. Edwards et al.
Watkins v. Mitchem et al.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.