Source: http://www.nylxs.com/messages.html?id=546532&archive=2017-05-01
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 03:10:59+00:00

Document:
Full case name Oracle America, Inc. v. Google, Inc.
issue, and remanding the issue of fair use to the district court.
sided in favor of Google, ruling the action to be fair use.
libraries for use with the language.
and licensing deals for Java, but no agreement was reached.
Oracle purchased Sun in January 2010, and continued developing Java.
three phases: copyright, patent, and damages.
but that neither the documentation nor the other literal code was.
statutory damages for a small amount of copied code.
portion of the jury verdict.
Copyright Act because it was a "system or method of operation."
Associates v. Altai, Gates Rubber v. Bando Chemical Industries, Lotus v.
Control Systems, Brown Bag Software v. Symantec Corp., Atari v.
Nintendo, Sega v. Accolade, and Sony v. Connectix.
organization is a dead letter. To the contrary, it is not a dead letter.
Computer, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp., 35 F.3d 1435, 1445 (9th Cir. 1994).
works of authorship fixed in any tangible medium of expression" (p. 17).
because its re-implementation of 37 Java APIs is protected by fair use.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.