Source: https://www.criminallegalnews.org/cln-litigation/KS/prison-legal-news-v-simmons-aclu-amicus-brief-to-10th-circuit-kansas-doc-censorship-2003/
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 22:15:56+00:00

Document:
Clement v. California Dept. of Corrections, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098 (N.D. Cal.
to communicate in writing with prisoners.
country allow inmates to receive gift subscriptions.
subscriptions provides an incentive for good behavior.
officials to track the source of a gift subscription.
publisher is entitled to notice and an opportunity to protest the KDOC's decision.
on gift subscriptions.' This Court should too.
from the protections of the constitution").
Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401, 410 n.9 (1989).
Return To Crime, Experts Say, L.A. Times, Jan. 30, 2000, at b2); Clement v.
• banning regular mail containing Internet-generated materials."
Appeals, have struck down prison regulations that banned all gift subscriptions."
Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 u.S. 401 (1989).
Morrison v. Hall, 261 F.3d 896,904 (9th Cir. 2001).
Prison Legal News v. Cook, 238 F.3d 1145, 1151 (9th Cir. 2001).
Clement v. California Dept. ofCorrections, 220 F. Supp. 2d 1098, 1109-13 (N.D.
Crofton v. Roe, 170 F.3d 957,960-61 (9th Cir. 1999); Rice, 76 P.3d at 1054.
country and reverse the decision of the district court.
The KDOC's Strong-Arming Justification is Without Merit.
76 P.3d 1048 (Kan. Ct. App. 2003).
170 P.3d 957, 960 (9th Cir. 1999).
The KDOC's Tracking Justification is Without Merit.
Rice also addressed the tracking justification accepted by the district court.
Rice, 76 P.3d at 1054.
rehabilitative system, and any such justification should be rejected by this Court.
heard when their publications are disapproved for receipt by inmate subscribers.?"
and given a reasonable opportunity to protest that decision.r"
on" receiving notice from the inmate.
be unconstitutional whether done on a case-by-case basis or under a blanket policy.
Montcalm Publishing Corp. v. Beck, 80 F.3d 105, 106 (4th Cir. 1996).
reasonable opportunity to protest that decision).
Zimmerman v. Simmons, 260 F. Supp . 2d 1077, 1086 (D. Kan. 2003) .
Montcalm , 80 F.3d at 109.
opportunity to be heard if that access is denied.
point and adopts those arguments by reference.
Prison Legal News v. Cook, 238 F.3d 1145, 1149 (9th Cir. 2001).
Thornburgh v. Abbott, 490 U.S. 401, 414 (1989).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.