Source: http://fg-law.com/news_fg-law.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 03:15:28+00:00

Document:
November 2010: In Intellectual Asset Management Magazine's November/December 2010 issue, "The Intangible Investor" columnist Bruce Berman favorably reviewed Robert Greenspoon's article "Is the United States Finally Ready for a Patent Small Claims Court?", published in the Spring 2009 issue of the Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology.
October 19, 2010: At the Chicago Bar Association, Robert Greenspoon spoke on a three-person panel sponsored by the Intellectual Property Law Committee about the Supreme Court's recent decision on patent-eligible subject matter in Bilski v. Doll .
July 30, 2010: The firm filed the Brief of Amici Curiae Acacia Research Corporation and 1st Media, LLC in Support of Neither Party and in Support of Returning the "Unenforceability" Defense to its Traditional Scope of "Unclean Hands," in Therasense, Inc. v. Becton, Dickinson and Company (Fed. Cir.) (Case No 2008-1511), a Federal Circuit Court of Appeals case involving the proper scope of the inequitable conduct defense.
July 1, 2010: At the DePaul University College of Law Center for Intellectual Property Law & Information Technology, Robert Greenspoon spoke on a four-person panel about the Supreme Court's recent decision on patent-eligible subject matter in Bilski v. Doll . The Federal Circuit Bar Association co-sponsored the event.
June 2010: Legal publisher Thomson-West selected Robert Greenspoon's article "Is the United States Finally Ready for a Patent Small Claims Court?" as one of the best patent law review articles of 2009, and included it in the 2010 edition of Patent Law Review.
July 22, 2009: The firm filed the Brief of Amicus Curiae TeleCommunication Systems, Inc. in Support of Neither Party and for Purely Prospective Application of Any Adoption of the New Legal Test Applied Below, in Bilski v. Doll (S. Ct.) (Case No. 08-964), a Supreme Court case involving the issue of patent subject matter eligibility.
July 2009: Robert Greenspoon published his article "Is the United States Finally Ready for a Patent Small Claims Court?" in the Spring 2009 issue of the Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology.
June 23, 2009: In Newegg v. Telecommunication Systems, Inc. , the firm and co-counsel won transfer from a California to a Maryland court, to bring a declaratory judgment case into the client's home district.
October 6, 2008: The firm won a patent appeal for 1st Technology, LLC against the online gaming enterprise Bodog Entertainment Group in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (App. No. 2008-1132) (affirming per curiam without opinion), resulting in affirmance of a $50 million patent infringement judgment.
October 3, 2008: In 1st Technology v. Bodog Entertainment Group , the firm and co-counsel won a preliminary injunction against the client's opponent, precluding the opponent from transfers of numerous intellectual property assets.
January 7, 2008: In Revenue Science, Inc. v. Valueclick, Inc. , the firm won dismissal on the pleadings of a complaint that accused the client of patent infringement.
December 26, 2007: The firm won major parts of a patent appeal for our clients HyperPhrase Technologies, LLC and HyperPhrase, Inc. against Google, Inc. in the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (App. No. 2007-1125, -1176) (affirming-in-part and reversing-in-part), resulting in remand for further proceedings in the trial court.
August 2007: William Flachsbart and Robert Greenspoon published their article, "Obviousness after KSR v. Teleflex , a Private Practice Perspective," in Intellectual Asset Management Magazine's August/September 2007 issue.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.