Source: http://www.internallydisplacedpeople.org/joomla30/index.php/donate-funding/join-our-fundraiser-show-me-the-law
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 16:34:05+00:00

Document:
THIS SITE WILL FOCUS ON SPECIFIC SOLUTIONS WHILE 1776Reloaded.org WILL FOCUS ON EDUCATION AND EXPANDING THE AWAKENING!
This is the short version of this fundraiser, click this link for an extended version of this page.
SHOW ME THE LAW NOT YOUR OPINION ON THE LAW?
Our fundraiser is now live!
Help raise funds for awareness of the issues presented here in IDP. We will be doing a series of videos, each one offering a sum certain to a particular class of people for particular proof of the law.
Initially we would like to raise $5,000 which will be awarded to the first law enforcement officer who can show us where in the law a regular man or woman (not a state employee, not operating in commerce nor a driver by profession) is required to have a license and where in the law a vehicle not used for commercial purposes is required to be registered.
All monies collected will be used for these purposes. This will kick off in USA. The second sum of $5,000 will be offered in U.K., then Australia, then Canada and South Africa (we will be looking for volunteers in those countries when the time arises, either to make the video or to write the script.
Other subjects down the line will include offers to the taxman, the "judge" and the politician.
As of February 6th 2018 through both the PayPal link and the You Caring site we have raised $1000.00 for this campaign. We are now working in a video to launch the Show me the law video campaign.
I'm disabled, and wish that I was able to give more. Pain is a daily companion. I believe in this cause, and my family prays that you all are successful in your endeavor to make this a known fact. It would certainly help those of us on limited incomes."
I will add that I got into this because I was trying to get out of an abusive relationship with four children and knew that I would not be able to afford renewing the drivers' license and registration. Thinking that I might find an exception in the code I read the entire book and found we were not even included to begin with.
This is a huge burden for people and is specifically geared to revenue generation. Not one cent received from the sale of cars impounded for lack of registration goes to the Department of Motor Vehicles. It is a bounty shared by police departments and impound yards! The question is: who owns these impound yards ?
Besides the financial burden, travelling on ones rights has become a danger. It has become a danger to read and travel in accordance with the law because the FBI sends out white papers to police departments citing "buzz words and phrases" that will identify you as a "sovereign citizen" and a potential danger to officers. This is a tactic being used to protect a valuable source of revenue and needs to be countered. The idea of this video is to get officers to read the law and hopefully realize that they are not enforcing laws they are enforcing policies and as such we are not the danger, the pencil pushing attorneys sending them out are the real danger to all of us!
What are internally displaced people?
The purpose of this website is to show there exists codes and statutes for the smooth running of our (collective) government (which has been hijacked) and then there is everything else!
Sovereignty entails not only the right of each state to conduct its own affairs but also the primary duty and responsibility to provide protection and assistance without discrimination to its population, including the internally displaced, in accordance with international human rights and humanitarian law.
While those displaced within their own country remain entitled to the full protection of rights available to the population in general, displacement gives rise to particular vulnerabilities on the part of those affected. Therefore, and in order to ensure that the displaced are not deprived of their human rights, states are obligated to provide special measures of protection and assistance to IDPs that correspond to these vulnerabilities in order to ensure that IDPs are treated equally with respect to non-displaced citizens.
...specifically how are we displaced?
Definitions by corporate Federal “State” for “in the state”, “in this state”, “in the state”, “within this state” and “this state”.
Note STATE OF CALIFORNIA is a De facto Corporation Sub of UNITED STATES Corp. successor to UNITED STATES c. 1871 which has authority only over the 68.34 square miles of the District of Columbia. To understand the concept of a Mutual Corp., watch the following video: CORPORATE NATION Full movie: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AVZnBLamNMk UNITED STATES Is a Federal Corporation as given under Title 28 Section 3002. Note a FEDERAL CORPORATION IS NOT a We the people Government. In the case of the DC UNITED STATES and the fifty STATE of STATES they are owned and operated by foreign unknown entities that are detailed elsewhere on this website.
Definitions by corporate Federal "State" for "in the state", "in this state", "in the state", "within this state" and "this state"
Revenue and Taxation §130(f) "In this state" means within the exterior limits of the State of California, and includes all territory within these limits owned by, or ceded to, the United States of America.
Revenue and Taxation §6017. "In this State" or "in the State" means within the exterior limits of the State of California and includes all territory within these limits owned by or ceded to the United States of America.
As you can see – “we the people” are not “in this state” or “in the state” so agents of “the state” are constantly finding ways to re-venue us or better still have us re-venue ourselves and as such we are internally displaced people!
For those that wish to understand how we are being re-venued in to the DC lex fori understand what is called a Tacit Agreements and/or Adhesion contracts. These create the presumption that we have KNOWINGLY made a decision to operate NOT as a private American national / private state national with unalienable rights but to operate as a UNITED STATES Citizen with only rights and privileges granted by de facto congress to us for a fee.
For example, Americans at 16 are told that they MUST have a license to drive. The statement is factually correct but the language is deliberately misleading.
American’s and the DMV code confuse driving with traveling. The term 'vehicle' applies to one using transportation for commercial means.
Driving means using a commercial vehicle for hire, i.e. engaging in commerce. Traveling is an unalienable right and you do not need a license to travel! Traveling in a private automobile is a private right that requires no license!
So – all Americans are tricked in to getting a license and acting as an agent of process for the US CITIZEN Franchise created by the UNITED STATES. The name on the license is not the live flesh blood sentient being but a Corporation, Franchise and what is called a decedent ESTATE.
Oppression under color or right; the criminal offense of obtaining money or other valuable thing by compulsion, actual force, or force of motives to the will; more technically defined as the unlawful taking by an officer of the law, by color of his office, of any money or thing of value that is not due to him, or the taking of more than is due, or the taking of money before it is due [Bush v. State, 19 Ariz 195, 168 P 508; 31 Am J2d Extort § 1]. A method of abuse of process [1 Am J2d Abuse P § 12].
In a large sense, it signifies any oppression, under color of right: but in a more strict sense it means the unlawful taking by any officer, by color of his office, of any money or thing of value that is not due to him, or more than is due, or before it is due [4 Bl. Com. 141; 1 Hawk. P. C. c. 68, s. 1; 1 Russ. Cr. *144]. To constitute extortion, there must be the receipt of money or something of value; the taking a promissory note, which is void, is not sufficient to make an extortion [2 Mass. R. 523; see Bac. Ab. h. t.; Co. Litt. 168]. It is extortion and oppression for an officer to take money for the performance of his duty, even though it be in the exercise of a discretionary power [2 Burr. 927]. It differs from exaction [(q. v.) See 6 Cowen, R. 661; 1 Caines, R. 130; 13 S. & R. 426 1 Yeates, 71; 1 South. 324; 3 Penna. R. 183; 7 Pick. 279; 1 Pick. 171].
Any oppression by color or pretense of right, and particularly the exaction by an officer of money, by color of his office, either when none at all is due, or not so much is due, or when it is not yet due [Preston v. Bacon, 4 Conn. 480].
Extortion consists in any public officer unlawfully taking, by color of his office, from any person any money or thing of value that is not due to him, or more than his due [Code Ga. 1882, § 4507].
Extortion is the obtaining of property from another, with his consent, induced by wrongful use of force or fear, or under color of official right [Pen. Code Cal § 518; Pen code Dak. § 608; and see Cohen v. State, 37 Tex. Cr. R. 118, 38 S. W. 1005; U. S. v. Deaver (D. C.), 14 Fed. 597; People v. Hoffman, 126 Cal. 366, 58 Pac. 856; State v. Logan, 104 La. 760, 29 South. 336; People v. Barondess, 61 Hun. 571, 16 N. Y. Supp. 436].
Extortion is an abuse of public justice, which consists in any officer unlawfully taking, by color of his office, form any man, any money, or thing of value that is not due to him, or before it is due [4 Bl. Comm. 141].
Extortion is any oppression under color of right. In a stricter sense, the taking of money by any officer, by color of his office, when none, or not so much is due, or it is not yet due [1 Hawk. P. C. (Curw. Ed.) 418].
It is the corrupt demanding or receiving by a person in office of a free for services which should be performed gratuitously; or where compensation is permissible, of a larger fee than the law justifies, or a fee not due [2 Bish. Crim. Law § 390].
The distinction between “bribery” and “extortion” seems to be this: the former offense consists in the offering a present, or receiving one, if offered; the latter, in demanding a fee or present, by color of office.
The act of extorting; the act or practice of wresting any thing from a person by force,duress, menaces, authority,or by any undue exercise of power; illegal exaction; illegal compulsion to pay money, or to do some other act. Extortion is an offense punishable at common law.
1. Force or illegal compulsion by which any thing is taken from a person.
Here follows a list of other acts that the STATE qualifies us as opting to be classed as a UNITED STATES Citizen.
“Resident” means any person who manifests an intent to live or be located “in this state” (quotes by PJ) on more than a temporary or transient basis. Presence in the state for six months or more in any 12-month period gives rise to a rebuttable presumption of residency.
(a) Address where registered to vote.
(b) Location of employment or place of business.
(c) Payment of resident tuition at a public institution of higher education.
(d) Attendance of dependents at a primary or secondary school.
(e) Filing a homeowner's property tax exemption.
(f) Renting or leasing a home for use as a residence.
(g) Declaration of residency to obtain a license or any other privilege or benefit not ordinarily extended to a nonresident.
(h) Possession of a California driver's license.
(i) Other acts, occurrences, or events that indicate presence in the state is more than temporary or transient.
NOTE STATE is not the physical state. Also note that CA is the fictional Federal overlay created for taxing purposes under the BUCK ACT.
The UNITED STATES Corps, STATE OF STATE Corps have no physical jurisdiction over the states! As can be seen above the UNITED STATES and its sub corps rely on us to put ourselves in their STATE through the above mechanisms!
― William Casey (CIA Director) 1981 Quote.
You can probably see from the above example regarding the difference between driving and traveling that we are being deliberately led astray in the planation school systems to make sure that we DO NOT KNOW who we really are and that we make the right steps to be classified as an Incorporated UNITED STATES Citizen! None of our children are taught about their birthright status as a private American national - private state national!
introduction on how Americans went from freedom back in to slavery under the Crown, Vatican UNITED STATES Corp. c. 1871.

References: §130
 §6017
 v. 
 § 1
 § 12
 v. 
 § 4507
 § 518
 § 608
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 390