Source: https://uni-tuebingen.de/en/research/core-research/collaborative-research-centers/sfb-833/research-groups/
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 22:25:05+00:00

Document:
The regular PhD colloquium ("Doko") of the SFB 833 offers our PhD students the opportunity to present their research in an informal setting as well as to practice presentations before conferences.
Our milestone program offers additional support for the PhD program: Together with their supervisors, our PhD students realize concrete goals at regular intervals in order to advance the doctorate as a whole.
In the research group “Psycholinguistic Lunch”, especially staff members who are part of psycholinguistically or experimentally working projects come together. According to desire, the results of current experiments are discussed, assistance for planned studies is given or specific experimental methods are presented. A further topic of the Psycholinguistic Lunch is the general discussion of a semantic processing model.
The R and statistical methods course invites all SFB staff and associated who want to learn programming in R and statistics or want to refresh their skills.
We meet every other week and adress diverse topics concerning programming in R and statistical analysis of linguistic data.
In winter semester 2018 during discussions in the Oberseminar "Combinatory Meaning Adaptions" (Beck / Bücking), the idea for the working group was created. The working group is interested in the question of which systematic rules can be used to adequately capture combinatorial meanings that arise at the level of lexical semantics. One of the theories dedicated to this task can be found in Nicholas Asher's Type Composition Logic (Lexical Meaning in Context: A Web of Words, Cambridge University Press, 2011). This theory is intended as a base to (i) explore further theories about meaning adaptations to the semantics/pragmatics interface and (ii) to contrast these theories.
We look forward to other interested parties who would like to join us. You are welcome to contact us at any time.
Current Topics: Syntactic deviations in poetry, tropes (metaphor, synecdoche, metonymy) and the analysis of stylistic devices. We are open for further topics for discussion.
Next Meeting: Friday, 1 February 2019, 16-18 h c.t.
The syntax work group permits members of different projects to come together in order to present their syntax work and discuss issues of common interest. There are meetings to jointly read the literature in the field, to discuss research plans, and to assist with the construction of syntax experiments.
The Information Structure Research Group will discuss topics based on the research interests of participants, providing an opportunity to present and discuss ongoing information structure related research. Central themes of the information structure research group include the role of context in information structure interpretation, the annotation of information structure in corpora, the interaction of information structure with prosody, the role of syntax as well as the role of information structure for processing. Besides reading and discussing current papers on information structure together, our meetings provide a platform to informally discuss our own experimental studies, methodological issues, as well as practice talks in which information structure features prominently.
Hartmann, J.M., Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.) (to appear) Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Egerland, V, V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds.) (to appear) Architecture of Topic. Studies in Generative Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Featherston, S., R. Hörnig, S. von Wietersheim and S. Winkler (eds.) (to appear) Information Structure and Semantic Processing. Linguistische Arbeiten. Berlin: De Gruyter.
De Kuthy, K. and A. Konietzko (to appear). Information Structural Constraints on PP Topicalization from NPs. In V. Egerland, V. Molnár and S. Winkler (eds.) Architecture of Topic. Studies in Generative Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hartmann, J.M. (to appear). Freezing in it-clefts: the role of the focus phrase. In J. Hartmann, M. Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.), Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Hartmann, J. M. (to appear). Focus and Prosody in Nominal Copula Clauses. In S. Featherston, R. Hörnig, S. von Wietersheim & S. Winkler (eds.), Information Structure and Semantic Processing. Linguistische Arbeiten. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Jäger, M. (to appear). An Experimental Study on Freezing and Topicalization in English. In J. Hartmann, M. Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.), Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Konietzko, A. (to appear). Heavy NP Shift in Context: On the Interaction of Information Structure and Extraction from Shifted Constituents. In J. M. Hartmann, M. Jäger, A. Kehl, A. Konietzko & S. Winkler (eds.), Freezing: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Domains. Berlin: De Gruyter.
"Reference Beyond the DP: Towards a Crosslinguistic Typology of the Syntax and Semantics of Proforms", organized by V. Hohaus (B1/C1) & A. Konietzko (A7) in the framework of the DGfS meeting in Stuttgart, March 2018.
"International Workshop on Variables at the Interface between Form and Meaning", July 2012.
V. Hohaus (C1) & A. Konietzko (A7): “VP-Proforms in Comparative Clauses: A Contrastive View on English and German.”, Universität des Saarlandes, Saarbrücken, December 2016.
V. Hohaus (C1) & A. Konietzko (A7): "VP-Proforms and Logical Form: The Perspective from English and German", Alternate Annual Meeting of the Israel Association for Theoretical Lingistics (IATL), October 2015.
P. Berezovskaya (C1), F. Schlotterbeck (B8) & O. Bott (XPrag): “Processing of Ambiguous Degree Constructions in German”, Linguistic Evidence 2018, Tübingen, February 2018.
V. Hohaus (C1) & A. Konietzko (A7): “On the Concept of Proforms.” Poznań Linguistic Meeting 45, Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniuc, September 2015.
One main focus of the research group was to discuss current theories that systematically seek to understand the interplay of lexical meaning on the one hand, and context and world knowledge on the other hand (e.g. Asher 2011, Recanati 2010). Furthermore, concrete questions of members of the working group were addressed, e.g. the interpretation of event- and state-nominalizations in context as well as the semantic annotation of nouns in the context of corpus studies.
The research group was organized by the projects A1 and A5.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 

V. 

V. 

V.