Source: http://journals.uran.ua/geofizicheskiy/article/view/111024
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 12:32:49+00:00

Document:
On the base of analysis and generalization of total available geological-geophysical information accumulated during forty years passed a complex of geophysical models of the earth’s crust has been obtained, which gives up-to-date idea on deep structure of the central part of the Karelian craton. The plotted seismic 3D density and magnetic models define more exactly our notions on stratification of the earth’s crust, the behavior of geophysical boundaries including the crust-mantle one. Complex interpretation of potential fields based on seismic model of the earth’s crust of the region taking into account petro-physical and geological data, made possible to estimate special features of layered-blocky structure of the region and of structural correlation of sub-longitudinal suture (the fragment of Ladoga-Pechenga zone of multiple activization) in tectonic division and its relation to deep magnetic sources.
Bilibina Т. V., Krutikhovskaya Z. А. Titov V. K., 1986. Regional magnetic anomalies and tectonics of the Aldan Shield. Sovetskaya geologiya (1), 106—115 (in Russian).
Glaznev V. N., 2003. Integrated geophysical models of the Fennoscandian lithosphere. Apatity: ZAO«K&M». 252 p. (in Russian).
Deep Structure and Seismicity of Karelia and Adjacent Territories, 2004. Ed. N. V. Sharov Petrozavodsk: KRC RAS Publ., 353 p. (in Russian).
Gorkovets V. Ya., Raevskaya M. B., Maksimovich L. A., 2012. Kostomuksha as a complex ore object of Karelian Republic. Gorniy zhurnal (9/1), 19—23. (in Russian).
Krasovskiy S. S., 1981. Reflection of the dynamics of the continental type earth crust in a gravity field. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 261 p. (in Russian).
Krasovskiy S. S., Kuprienko P. Ya., Krasovskiy А. S., 1998. Volumtric gravity modelling of of the deep lithospheric structures of Ukraine. Theoretical and practical problems in geological interpretation of gravity, magnetic and electrical fields: Proc. Int. Conf. Voronezh: VU Publ. P. 80—92 (in Russian).
Krutikhovskaya Z. А., 1986. Deep magnetic heterogeneities — a myth or reality? Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 8(5), 3—22 (in Russian).
Krutikhovskaya Z. А., Negrutsa V. Z., Eliseyeva S. V., 1986. Historical and geological-prerequisites of the emergence of regional magnetic anomalies in the eastern Baltic Shield. Geofizicheskij zhurnal 8(5), 67—78 (in Russian).
Kuprienko P. Ya., Makarenko I. B., Starostenko V. I., Legostaeva О. V., 2007. Three-dimensional density model of the earth crust and the upper mantle of the Ukrainian Shield. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 29(5), 3—27 (in Russian).
The Lithosphere of Central and Eastern Europe: Geotraverses I, II, and V, 1987. Ed. A. V. Chekunov. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 168 p. (in Russian).
Magnetic model of the lithosphere of Europe, 1990. Ed. G. I. Karataev. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 168 p. (in Russian).
Orliuk M. I., Pashkevich I. K., 2012. Deep sources of regional magnetic anomalies: tectonotypes and relation with transcrustal faults. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 34(4), 224—234 (in Russian).
Pashkevich I. K., Orlyuk М. I., Eliseyeva S. V., Mozgovaya А. P., 1992. Comparative description of the deep magnetic heterogeneities of the Baltic and Ukrainian Shields. Deep structure and dynamics of the crystalline shields of the European USSR. Collection of Scientific Papers. Apatity: KRC RAS Publ., P. 19—29 (in Russian).
Petromagnetic map of the eastern Baltic Shield, 1977. 1 : 1 000 000. Ed. N. B. Dortman. 7 sh.
Petromagnetic model of the lithosphere, 1993. Ed. D. М. Pecherskiy. Kiev: Naukova Dumka, 175 p. (in Russian).
Savchenko А. S., Starostenko V. I., Legostaeva О. V., Makarenko I. B., 2008. Practical application of an automated complex for interpreting potential field data by selecting. Theoretical and practical problems in geological interpretation of gravity, magnetic and electrical fields: Proc. of the 35th session of D. G. Uspenskiy Int. Seminar 29 January — 3 February 2008. Ukhta: USTU Publ., P. 271—274 (in Russian).
Starostenko V. I., Dyadyura V. А., Zavorot’ko А. N., 1975. On interpreting a gravity field by the selection method. Izvestiya АN SSSR. Ser. Fizika Zemli (4), 78—86 (in Russian).
Starostenko V. I., Legostaeva О. V., 1998. Direct gravimetric problem for a heterogeneous, arbitrarily truncated vertical rectangular prism. Fizika Zemli (12), 31—44 (in Russian).
Starostenko V. I., Legostaeva О. V., Makarenko I. B., Pavlyuk Е. V., Sharypanov V. М., 2004. On automated input of geological-geophysical map images with first-rank breaks and visualization of three-dimensional geophysical models and their fields in interactive model. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 26(1), 3—13 (in Russian).
Starostenko V. I., Sharypanov V. М., Savchenko А. S., Legostaeva О. V., Makarenko I. B., Kuprienko P. Ya., 2011.On automated interactive processing of the graphic images of geological and geophysical objects. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 33(1), 54—62 (in Russian).
Starostenko V. I., Shuman V. N., Ivashchenko I. N., Legostaeva О. V., Savchenko А. S., Skrinik О. Ya., 2009. Magnetic fields of three-dimensional anisotropic bodies: theoretical and practical calculations. Fizika Zemli (8), 20—35 (in Russian).
Tsvetkova T. A., Shumlyanskaya L. A., Bugaenko I. V., Zaets L. N., 2010. Seismic-tomograhy of the East-European platform: three-dimensional P-velocity model of the mantle under Fennoscandia. II. Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 32(1), 60—76 (in Russian).
Chekunov A. V., Starostenko V. I., Krasovskiy S. S., Kutas R. I., Orovetskiy Yu. P., Pashkevich I. K., Tripolskiy A. A., Eliseeva S. V., Kuprienko P. Ya., Mitrofanov F. P., Sharov N. V., Zagorodniy V. G., Glaznev V. N., Garetskiy R. G., Karataev G.I ., Aksamentova N. V., Guterkh A., Grabovska T., Koblanski A., Ryka V., Dadlez R., Tsvoidzinsky S., Korkhonen Kh., Luosto U., Gaal G., Zhuravlev V., Sadov A. S., 1993. Geotransect EURO-3 (EU-3). Geofizicheskiy zhurnal 15(2), 3—31 (in Russian).
Sharov N. V., 2013. Deep seismic studies in the Central Karelian craton. Fizika Zemli (1), 36—52 (in Russian).
Sharov N. V., 1993. Lithosphere of the Baltic Shield from seismic data). Apatity: KRC RAS Publ., 144 р. (in Russian).
Sharov N. V., Mitrofanov F. N., 2014. Velocity Heterogeneities in the Lithosphere of the Fennoscandian (Baltic) Shield. Doklady AN 454(2), 221—224.
Koistinen T., Stephens M. B., Bogatchev V., Nordgulen O., Wennerström M., Korhonen J., 2001. Geological Map of the Fennoscandian Shield. Scale 1:2000 000. Geological Surveys of Finland, Norway, Sweden and the North-West Department of Natural Resources of Russia.
Korhonen J. V., Aaro S., All T., Elo S., Haller L. Ä, Kääriäinen J., Kulinich A., Skilbrei J. R., Solheim D., Säävuori H., Vaher R., Zhdanova L., Koistinen T., 2002а. Bouguer Anomaly Map of the Fennoscandian Shield. Scale 1:2000 000. Geological Surveys of Finland, Norway and Sweden and Ministry of Natural Resources of Russian Federation.
Korhonen J. V., Aaro S., All T., Nevanlinnce H., Skilbrei J. R., Säävuori H., Vaher R., Zhdanova L., Koistinen T., 2002б. Magnetic Anomaly Map of the Fennoscandian Shield. Scale 1:2000 000. Geological Surveys of Finland, Norway and Sweden and Ministry of Natural Resources of Russian Federation.
Korja A., Heikkinen P. J., 2008. Seismic images of Paleoproterozoic microplate boundaries in the Fennoscandian Shield. The Geological Society of America Special Paper 440, 229—248.
Kukkonen I. T., Lahtinen R. Finnish Reflection Experiment FIRE 2001—2005, 2006. Geological Survey of Finland, Special Paper 43. 247 p.
Mitrofanov F. P., Sharov N. V., Zagorodny V. G., Glaznev V. N., 1998. Crustal Structure of the Baltic Shield Along the Pechenga—Kostomuksha—Lovisa Geotraverse. Int. Geol. Rev. 40(11), 990—997.
Silvennoinen H., Kozlovskaya E., 2007. 3D structure and physical properties of the Kuhmo Greenstone Belt (eastern Finland): Constraints from gravity modeling and seismic data and implications for the tectonic setting. J. Geodyn. 43, 358—373.
Yliniemi J., Kozlovskaya E., Hjelt S. E., Komminaho K., Ushakov A. and the SVEKALAPKO Seismic Tomography Working Group, 2004. Structure of the crust and uppermost mantle beneath southern Finland revealed by analysis of local events registered by the SVEKALAPKO seismic array. Tectonophysics 394, 41—67.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.