Source: https://npo.tspu.edu.ru/en/archive.html?year=2019&issue=1&article_id=7199
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 06:06:46+00:00

Document:
The article is devoted to the problem of statement of the purposes of mathematical training of students in the aspect of requirements of the FSES to the formation of universal educational action (UEA). The analysis of known approaches to the structuring and description of universal educational actions as an expected result of teaching mathematics is carried out. The article presents a structural model of universal educational actions without taking into account the specifics of the subject “Mathematics”, based on the list of meta-subject results of the development of the basic educational program of basic General education. The interrelation of metafunctional approach and the requirements to subject results in teaching mathematics is shown. Formulated the concept of “key universal educational actions”, as well as their composition. The article substantiates and presents the structural and content models of the universal educational action “establishment of analogies (comparison)” and “information decoding” on the basis of the operational composition of motivation and orientation components. The content of these components based on cognitive and praxeological elements of action is determined. The characteristics of each action element are disclosed. The purpose of the publication is to describe the author’s approach to modeling the key universal learning actions as a component of students’ mathematical preparation.
1. Shkerina L. V., Savolaynen G. S. Dinamicheskaya model’ kachestva podgotovki uchashchikhsya obshcheobrazovatel’noy shkoly s pozitsiy kompetentnostnogo podkhoda [Dynamic model of quality of preparation of pupils of secondary school from the position of competence approach]. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State Pedagogical University named after V. P. Astafiev Publ., 2007. 27 p. (in Russian).
2. Bozhenkova L. I. Metodika formirovaniya universal’nykh uchebnykh deystviy pri obuchenii algebre [Methods of formation of universal educational actions in teaching algebra]. Moscow, Laboratoriya znaniy Publ., 2016. 20 p. (in Russian).
3. Аlekseeva Е. Е. Planirovaniye uchitelem formirovaniya universal’nykh uchebnykh deystviy pri оbuchenii sostavleniyu i resheniyu zadach v kurse geometrii [Teacher planning the formation of universal educational activities in teaching the preparation and solution of problems in the course of geometry]. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern problems of science and education, 2017, no. 6, pp. 191–194 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=32390488 (accessed 30 September 2018).
4. Shkerina L. V., Konstantinova L. S., Kursish I. F. Formirovaniye metapredmetnykh umeniy shkol’nikov v usloviyakh proektnogo obucheniya matematike [Formation of metasubject skills of students in terms of project learning mathematics]. Vestnik Krasnoyarskogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. V. P. Astaf’yeva – The bulletin of KSPU named after V. P. Astafi ev, 2016, no. 1, pp. 39–42 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=25682207 (accessed 1 June 2018).
5. Zhuravlyov I. A. Strukturno-funktsional’naya model’ razvitiya universal’nykh uchebnykh deystviy s ispol’zovaniyem sredstv naglyadnosti pri obuchenii geometrii na stupeni osnovnogo obshchego obrazovaniya [Structural and functional model of development of universal educational actions with the use of visualization tools for teaching geometry at the stage of basic General education]. Sovremennyye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya – Modern problems of science and education, 2015, no. 4, p. 47 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/query_results.asp (accessed 11 May 2018).
6. Moiseeva I. G. Ponyatiye integrativnogo podkhoda k formirovaniyu regulyativnykh universal’nykh uchebnykh deystviy i ego prakticheskoye primeneniye [The concept of an integrative approach to the formation of regulatory universal educational actions and its practical application]. Vestnik Kostromskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta – Vestnik of Kostroma State University, 2014, vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 12–14 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=22776550 (accessed 30 September 2018).
7. Podkhodova N. S., Fefi lova E. F. Osobennosti formirovaniya poznavatel’nykh universal’nykh uchebnykh deystviy [Features of formation of cognitive universal educational actions]. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta – Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University, 2013, no. 1, pp. 227–231 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=21626026 (accessed 15 May 2018).
8. Shkerina L. V. Metodika vyyavleniya i otsenivaniya urovnya sformirovannosti professional’nykh kompetentsiy studentov – budushchikh uchiteley matematiki [Methods of identifi cation and evaluation of the level of formation of professional competences of students – future mathematics teachers]. Krasnoyarsk, Krasnoyarsk State University named after V. P. Astafi ev Publ., 2015. 23 p. (in Russian).
9. Talyzina L. F. Pedagogicheskaya psihologiya [Educational psychology]. Moscow, Akademiya Publ., 1998. 54 p. (in Russian).
10. Demidova M. V. Modelirovaniye universal’nykh uchebnykh deystviy v tselevom komponente obucheniya matematike [Modeling of universal educational actions in the target component of mathematics training]. Pedagogicheskiy imidzh, 2017, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 83–88 (in Russian). URL.: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=29043802/ (accessed 9 June 2018).

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.