Source: http://geocitiessites.com/haeji/school/con_.law.outline7.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 16:21:00+00:00

Document:
If adeq. & indep. state grounds in state ct dec. where no fed quest. is present, then not subj. 2 fed. rev.
Lack of respect 4 other branches if dec.
Unusual need 2 adhere 2 political dec.
Potential embarrassment from multifarious pronouncements by various depts on 1 quest.
Institutional capacity of elected v. jud.
Not 2 dec. is 2 dec.
Remedy @ law which meets case in controv.
Concrete pers. injury in fact, dif. from person on the st.
Cong'al Control: Zone of Int.
Adler v. Board of Ed.
Nec. means conv., nec. & approp.
Law of the Land W/O Further Leg.
ISC not subj. 2 Cong. reg. unless affects other states, then Cong. can reg.
10th amend. gives immunity from fed. reg.
Lottery Case: Inherently Evil Stand.
Wickard v. Filburn: Aggregation Stand.
Ollie's BBQ, Civil Rts, Heart of Atlanta Motel v. US: Pretextual Stand.
Negative Implication of CC / Imply No Pwr 2 States by Giving 2 Cong.
If reg. even-handedly, no discrim, effect on IC incidental, then o.k.
If burden on IC higher than local benefit, not o.k.
Cong. not involved 2 increase own pwr @ exepense of exec.
Share treaty & appt. ambassador btwn Pres. & Leg.
Curtiss-Wright: fn'sm & external sov.
Sole: Pres. acts persuant 2 Const. w/o Cong.
National emergency case so practical dec.
Concurr. rsln: Passed by both houses but no Pres.
Leg. Veto's pwr was derived from statute that incorp'ed not by itlsef when tagged in specif. statute, bill, etc.
Text: Presentment Clause of Art 1, �but unclear lang.
�d)1: Not alter Const'al auth. of Cong. / Pres.
Morrison v. Olson: No indep. counsel by Cong. w/o Pres.
Mistretta v. US: Judges allowed 2 B in sentencing guidline committee by Cong.
Buckley v. Valeo: Can't have exec. fn's & not B appt'ed by Pres.
Bowsher v. Synar: Pres's job of balancing budget so can't dismiss GAO by Cong. concurr. / can't do exec. fn.
Can't testify 4 empl. but gen'ly can get permission from Sen.
Sole Pwr 2 House of Rep & Sen.
No jud. rev. b/c polit. quest.
State didn't have rt. before Const.
Need state axn / govt'al official by Civil Rts Cases b/c Const. limit only on govt except 4 13th amend.
Symbiotic Test (Burton v. Wilmington Parking Auth.): When state subK & each derive cert. benefit from rel. then symbiotic so state liab.
Incorp'in B/R through 14th amend.
Nor deprive any person of life, lib., / prop.
Stand's 4 D/P & Incorp.
Duncan v. LA (modern): Fund'al 2 Amer. scheme of justice so broader than ordered lib. but narrower than full incorp.
Adamson v. CA: Black's dissent 4 full incorp. but not incl. 9th amend.
Keystone: Extent 2 which a reg. advances a legit. state int. v. extent 2 which it denies prop. owner an econ'ly viable use of prop.
Hewitt Case: Nat. rt as source of lib. int.
Balance of priv. int, risk of deprivation, alt's, burden on state, etc.
Near v. Minn.: 1st amend., polit. process, & integrity of channels of rep.
Rep. reinforcement: process malfn so need strict scrutiny 4 14th amend.
Subst. D/P dead unless 4 Const'al rt.
Harlan: Ordered lib. & 14th amend.
Tradition: Eng. speaking / implicit in ordered lib. but circular b/c maj. dec's trad.
Biological / Psychological: Prioritize hierarchy of needs so food, clothing, & shelter more imp.
Ashcroft: 2nd dr's reqt o.k.
PPSP v. Casey: Viability testing o.k.
If reg. unduly burdens women is the stand.
Plain meaning rule that if Const. text dispositive, then no extrinsic ref.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 Art 1
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.