Source: http://www.azattorneymag-digital.com/azattorneymag/201606/?pg=68
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 13:08:12+00:00

Document:
Detailed summaries of selected cases and other court news may be found at www.azapp.com.
of the judgment pending the appeal.
Collection of an unpaid spousal maintenance order is subject to a three-year statute of limitations established by A.R.S. § 25-553(A). Where the order does not establish a specific beginning date for payment, the order becomes effective upon entry of the order. Such an order is not so ambiguous as to create a “dispute” barring dismissal of collection efforts pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-553(C). Ames v. Ames, 1 CA-CV 15-0013 FC, 3/10/16.
69, ARFLP, the trial court must hold an evidentiary hearing to determine whether such should be enforced pursuant to A.R.S. § 25-317. The contention that such agreement was reached is not precluded from evidence pursuant to Rule 408, ARIZ.R.EVID. An award of attorney fees must be supported by evidence from the record regardless of whether findings of fact are requested. Murray v. Murray, 1 CA-CV 15-0170 FC, 2/4/2016.
Burden is on grandparent/ third-party seeking visitation to show that a fit parent’s decision to deny visitation would substantially impair the child’s best interest. A parent who opposes visitation by a third party does not bear the burden of proof under A.R.S. § 25-409. “Special weight” pursuant to § 25-409 means the party that is seeking visitation must prove that a fit parent’s decision to deny visitation would substantially impair the child’s best interests. Goodman v.
Forsen, 1 CA-CV 14–0844 FC, 1/28/16.
In considering whether to terminate father’s parental rights to an infant child on the grounds of father’s 2.5-year prison sentence, the trial court was permitted to consider, but not required to consider, the possibility that father might qualify for an early release from incarceration. Jeffrey P. v. DES, S.P., 1 CA-JV 15-0031, 3/1/16.

References: § 25
 § 25
 v. 
 § 25
 v. 
 § 25
 § 25
 v.

 v.