Source: https://wicourts.gov/news/view.jsp?id=1072
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 06:25:53+00:00

Document:
The Wisconsin Supreme Court has voted to accept two new cases, and the Court acted to deny review in a number of other cases. The case numbers, counties of origin, and issues presented in the granted cases are listed below. More detailed synopses will be released at a later date. More information about pending appellate cases can be found on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and Court of Appeals Access website. Published Court of Appeals opinions can be found here, and the status of cases pending in the Supreme Court can be found here.
Is a property owner whose property is subject to a partial taking permitted to rely on a condemnor's promises to construct improvements in a manner intended to provide post-taking benefits to the property owner in exchange for greater compensation.
If a condemnor is able to acquire property in eminent domain at a lower cost by including construction of improvements for the benefit of the property owner in its project, but does not subsequently construct those improvements as promised, does claim preclusion prevent the property owner from maintaining an action against the condemnor for damages or to compel construction of the promised improvement to the promised standard?
If the lower courts' answers to Issue II are correct, is a special exception to the doctrine of claim preclusion appropriate or necessary for such circumstances in the context of eminent domain proceedings.
Can a private citizen maintain an action against a town for failing to construct a town road in accordance with the geometric design standards of Wis. Stat. § 82.50.
2017AP2510 Antoinette Lang v. Lions Club of Cudahy Wis., Inc.
Issue presented: Is Fryed Audio, LLC an agent of the Lions Club such that they are afforded immunity under Wis. Stat. § 895.52?
17AP1769 Watson v. Rural Masonry, Inc.
17AP2113-CR State v. Rashada—Chief Justice Patience Drake Roggensack did not participate.
17AP2430-CR State v. McBride—Justice Rebecca Frank Dallet did not participate.
17AP2503-CR State v. Jewell—Justice Rebecca Frank Dallet did not participate.
18AP129-CR State v. Jones—Justice Rebecca Frank Dallet did not participate.
18AP1131 Milwaukee County v. T.L.R.
17AP1393 Ozaukee County DHS v. S.S.Z.—Justice Rebecca Frank Dallet did not participate.

References: § 82
 v. 
 § 895
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.