Source: https://www.omaralawoffice.com/dwi-case-results.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 10:36:58+00:00

Document:
The following brief synopses are actual case results from the years 2011-2016 where the O’Mara Law Firm was able to obtain an Acquittal or a Dismissal of DWI charges or DWI/Refusal charges on behalf of our clients. In each of the below listed DWI matters, the O’Mara law firm was able to convince the Court that the obtained Alcotest 7110 results were inadmissible in evidence, and also that the State could not prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the arresting officer’s observations.
State of New Jersey v. A.M.
Client was arrested and charged with his second offense DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 Testing, which yielded a .16% BAC. Trial was conducted over the course of two days on this matter, and following consideration of the defense case, as well as testimony from an expert witness, the charges were completely DISMISSED and the client was FOUND NOT GUILTY of DWI.
State of New Jersey v. E.B.
State of New Jersey v. M.A.
State of New Jersey v. M.D.
Client was arrested and charged with a DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .16% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations, and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. P.E.
Client was arrested and charged with a third offense DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .20% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, not could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt base upon the observations, and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. M.B.
Client was arrested and charged with his second offense DWI following a motor vehicle accident. Defendant was subjected to Blood Testing at the hospital, which yielded a result .13% BAC. Following consideration of the defense case, as well as legal memorandum establishing that the State could not prove the element of Operation in this matter, the DWI charge was completely DISMISSED and the client was found not guilty.
State of New Jersey v. J.H.
Client was arrested and charged with a DWI following an accident. Defendant was subjected to hospital blood testing, which yielded a result of .16% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the blood test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt based upon observations, and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. E.K.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .16% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations, and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. S.M.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .13% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .12% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt base upon the observations, and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. K.M.
Client was arrested and charged with his second DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .27% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. N.P.
Client was arrested and charged with his second offense DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 Testing, which yielded a .20% BAC. Trial was conducted over a course of two days on this matter, and following consideration of the defense case, as well as testimony from an expert witness, the charges were completely DISMISSED and the client was FOUND NOT GUILTY of DWI.
State of New Jersey v. G.M.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .15% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the DWI beyond a reasonable doubt and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. T.S.
Client was arrested and charged with a second DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .17% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. E.S.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .18% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. H.W.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt based on the observations, and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. P.R.
Client was arrested and charged with his second DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt based upon the observations and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. D.P.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .09 BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. H.C.
Following a minor motor vehicle accident, client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to blood testing at the hospital, which yielded a result of .30% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the blood test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt based upon the observations, and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. J.B.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED. Client entered a guilty plea to Reckless driving with 30 days loss of license.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, and that they could not prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations, so the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. L.B.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. L.R.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations, and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. R.F.
State of New Jersey v. P.A.
State of New Jersey v. W.D.
State of New Jersey v. F.S.
Client was arrested and charged with his second DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the charges beyond a reasonable doubt, and the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. A.C.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .09% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test, nor could they prove the DWI. Accordingly, the DWI was DIMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. S.K.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI alleging she was under the influence of controlled dangerous substances (CDS). Based on legal arguments and motions forwarded on behalf of the client, the Municipal Prosecutor conceded that he was unable to establish proof of the DWI beyond reasonable doubt and the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. J.M.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. The defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .08%BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they would not be able to establish admissibility of the breath test result and the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI following a motor vehicle accident. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .15% BAC. Based upon legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish proof of DWI beyond reasonable doubt, not could they establish admissibility of the Alcotest result. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with a second offense DWI and REFUSAL. Following consideration of legal arguments, motions and trial memorandum forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish proof beyond reasonable doubt on the DWI charge, and the DWI was DISMISSED. Client entered a plea of guilty to the charge of refusing to submit, and was sentenced as a first offender.
State of New Jersey v. C.E.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI following a motor vehicle accident. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .14% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions and trial memorandum forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the Alcotest readings, and that they could not proof this case beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations of the arresting officer, and the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. L.V.
Client was arrested and charged with a DWI alleging that he was under the influence of controlled dangerous substances (CDS). Based on legal arguments, motions and legal memorandum forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish that the defendant was actually driving under the influence of drugs, and the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. The Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .14% BAC. Based upon legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they would not be able to establish the admissibility of breath test results, nor could they prove the charge of DWI based on the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. The Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .13% BAC. Based upon legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they would not be able to establish the admissibility of breath test results, nor could they prove the charge of DWI based on the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. T.M.
State of New Jersey v. O.L.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. The Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .11% BAC. Based upon legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they would not be able to establish the admissibility of breath test results, nor could they prove the charge of DWI based on the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. M.P.
State of New Jersey v. D.H.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. The Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .10% BAC. Based upon legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they would not be able to establish the admissibility of breath test results, nor could they prove the charge of DWI based on the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. A.G.
Underage client was arrested and charged with DWI. The Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .16% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results, which were suppressed from evidence. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED. Client entered plea of guilty to the statute of operating a vehicle underage after having consumed alcohol, and received a 30 day loss of license.
State of New Jersey v. B.F.
Client was arrested and charged with his second offense DWI. Based upon legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they would not be able to establish the admissibility of breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. R.S.
Underage client was arrested and charged with an underage DWI. The defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .09% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test result, and the DWI was DISMISSED. Client entered a plea of guilty of an underage driving after having consumed alcohol.
State of New Jersey v. C.M.
Client was arrested and charged with a second offense DWI following a motor vehicle accident. A blood test was drawn at the hospital which yielded a .23% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that the State was unable at Trial to establish the admissibility of the blood test results. Municipal Court Judge also found that the evidence was insufficient to prove the DWI beyond a reasonable doubt, and the DWI was DISMISSED. Municipal Court Judge found client guilty of reckless driving with a 60 day loss of license.
State of New Jersey v. V.A.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .14% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the Alcotest results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. N.F.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .12% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. M.O.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .13% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test result, nor could they prove the charge of DWI beyond a reasonable doubt based on the observations. Accordingly the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. S.E.
Client was arrested and charged with second offense DWI. The defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .14% BAC. Based upon legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded they would not be able to establish the admissibility of the breath test result, nor could they prove the DWI beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. O.S.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the DWI charge beyond a reasonable doubt, and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI under the influence of NARCOTICS. Based on legal arguments, motions and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that the urinalysis which was performed on the defendant following her arrest, as well as the drug recognition expert examination forwarded by the State was not sufficient to prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. G.G.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .09% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the breath test result, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. J.V.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI following a motor vehicle accident, where after he left the scene. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .11% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. C.C.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .14% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. D.C.
Client was arrested and charged with his third offense DWI following a motor vehicle accident. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .29% BAC. Based upon legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded they could not be able to establish the proof to establish the admissibility of the breath test result, nor could they prove the charge of DWI on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. F.R.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .14% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the propriety of the stop, which led to the arrest of the defendant, and, therefore, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. K.S.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .13% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with a second offense DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. D.T.
Client was arrested and charged with a DWI following a motor vehicle accident. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .16% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. K.R.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .11% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the DWI beyond reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. A blood test was taken from the defendant which yielded a result of .08% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the blood test result on various bases, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. C.L.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI following a motor vehicle accident. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .11% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the breath test results, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on the basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with a second offense DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .13% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memoranda forwarded by The O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they cannot establish the admissibility of the breath test result, nor could they prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt on a basis of the observations. Accordingly, the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .15% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .17% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .21% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI, (driving under the influence of drugs.) The Defendant was subjected to drug recognition testing, however the State conceded that they could not establish proof beyond reasonable doubt. DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .18% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .09% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results nor could they prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt, the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .27% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .14% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .11% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with 2nd offense DWI. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they would not be able to prove the DWI and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with 2nd offense DWI. The Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .16% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Client was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .12% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trail memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they would not be able to prove the DWI charge and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with a DWI. Client was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .13% BAC. Pursuant to legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results nor could they prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt, the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Client was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .13% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the DWI charge was completely DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with a 2nd offense DWI. Client was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .16% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the 2nd DWI offense charge was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Client was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .14% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not prove this case beyond a reasonable doubt and the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. L.C.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .12% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with DWI. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing, which yielded a result of .03% BAC. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandums, forwarded by the O'Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the DWI was DISSMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. T. N.
Client was arrested and charged with a fourth offense D.W.I. and Driving While Suspended. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .17% B.A.C. Based on legal arguments, motions, and trial memorandum forwarded by The O’Mara Law Firm, the State conceded that they could not establish the admissibility of the breath test results and the D.W.I. was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. C. H.
Client was arrested and charged with D.W.I. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .13% BAC. Pursuant to legal arguments forwarded by The O’Mara Law Firm, the Alcotest results were suppressed from evidence and the D.W.I. charge was DISMISSED.
Client was arrested and charged with D.W.I. after being arrested and subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a result of .08% B.A.C. Pursuant to legal arguments forwarded by The O’Mara Law Firm, the Alcotest results were suppressed from evidence and the D.W.I. charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. K.F.
Defendant was arrested and charged with D.W.I. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a .16% B.A.C. Based on legal arguments forwarded by The O’Mara Law Firm, the prosecution agreed that they would not be able to establish the proof of D.W.I. beyond a reasonable doubt, and, therefore the D.W.I. was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. P.G.
Defendant was arrested and charged with D.W.I. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a .15% B.A.C. Pursuant to legal arguments forwarded by The O’Mara Law Firm, the Alcotest results were suppressed from evidence and the D.W.I. charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. E.M.
Defendant was arrested and charged with second offense D.W.I. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a .15% B.A.C. Pursuant to legal memorandum and arguments forwarded by the O’Mara Law Firm, the DWI was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. P.H.
Defendant was arrested and charged with D.W.I. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a .12% B.A.C. Following trial, the DWI charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. D.R.
Defendant was arrested and charged with D.W.I. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a .10% B.A.C. Pursuant to legal arguments forwarded by The O’Mara Law Firm, the Alcotest results were suppressed from evidence and the D.W.I. charge was DISMISSED.
Defendant was arrested and charged with D.W.I. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a .14% B.A.C. Pursuant to legal arguments forwarded by The O’Mara Law Firm, the Alcotest results were suppressed from evidence and the D.W.I. charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. K.B.
Defendant was arrested and charged with D.W.I. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a .11% B.A.C. Pursuant to legal arguments forwarded by The O’Mara Law Firm, the Alcotest results were suppressed from evidence and the D.W.I. charge was DISMISSED.
State of New Jersey v. M.L.
Defendant was arrested and charged with second offense D.W.I. Defendant was subjected to Alcotest 7110 testing which yielded a .16% B.A.C. Pursuant to legal arguments forwarded by The O’Mara Law Firm, the Alcotest results were suppressed from evidence and the D.W.I. charge was DISMISSED.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.