Source: http://www.carsandracingstuff.com/library/government/303US177.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 06:26:44+00:00

Document:
Case:   S.C. HWY. DEPT. V. BARNWELL BROS.
MOVING ONLY WITHIN THE STAE.  P. 184.
PRESENTED IN COURT APPEARS TO FAVOR A DIFFERENT STANDARD.  P. 191.
THAT THE LEGISLATIVE CHOICE IS WITHOUT RATIONAL BASIS.  ID.
LEGISLATIVE JUDGMENT.  PP. 192 ET SEQ.
THAT THEY IMPOSE AN UNCONSTITUTIONAL BURDEN ON INTERSTATE COMMERCE.
INTERSTATE COMMERCE, THESE RESTRICTIONS ARE UNREASONABLE.
WIDTH IS LIMITED TO 96 INCHES.
WIDTH OF TRUCKS ENGAGED IN INTERSTATE COMMERCE.
SOUTH CAROLINA HAS BUILT ITS HIGHWAYS AND OWNS AND MAINTAINS THEM.
STATES HAVE RETAINED UNDER THE CONSTITUTION.
STATE ACTION AFFECTING INTERSTATE COMMERCE.  EVER SINCE WILLSON V.
CLAUSE WAS ADOPTED.  SEE GIBBONS V. OGDEN, 9 WHEAT.  1, 187; BROWN V.
U.S. 566, 574; MAINE V. GRAND TRUNK R. CO., 142 U.S. 217; BALDWIN V.
WITHOUT THE STATE IS A SAFEGUARD AGAINST THEIR ABUSE.
MATERIALLY AFFECTED.  MINNESOTA RATE CASES, 230 U.S. 352, 416.
INTRASTATE.  MORRIS V. DUBY, SUPRA; SPROLES V. BINFORD, SUPRA.
EXACTION OF A REASONABLE FEE FOR THE USE OF THE HIGHWAYS.  HENDRICK V.
BUSSES CORP. V. BLODGETT, 276 U.S. 245; MORF V. BINGAMAN, SUPRA; CF.
INGELS V. MORF, 300 U.S. 290.
UNDER THE CONSTITUTION, HAS BEEN LEFT TO THE STATES.
REGULATION CHOSEN ARE REASONABLY ADAPTED TO THE END SOUGHT.  SPROLES V.
BINFORD, SUPRA; STEPHENSON V. BINFORD, 287 U.S. 251, 272.
390; MINNESOTA RATE CASES, SUPRA, 399, 400; SMITH V. ST. LOUIS & S.W.R.
EX REL. SILZ V. HESTERBERG, 211 U.S. 31, 42, 43.
PRESENTED IN COURT APPEARS TO FAVOR A DIFFERENT STANDARD.  CF.
HIGHWAYS FROM THE RISK OF EXCESSIVE LOADS.
LESS THAN FOUR TIMES THE PERMISSIBLE WHEEL LIMIT.
INDEFINITELY WHEEL LOADS IN EXCESS OF 4,200 POUNDS.
ROADS CONSTRUCTED WITHOUT A CENTER JOINT.
THAN TWO AXLES.  ACT NO. 721, 33 STAT. 1182; ACT NO. 685, 36 STAT.
ALL THE USE OF A 96 INCH TRUCK LEAVES BUT A NARROW MARGIN FOR PASSING.
WITHIN THE RANGE OF THE PERMISSIBLE LEGISLATIVE CHOICE.
THE RESULTING BURDEN ON INTERSTATE COMMERCE IS NOT FORBIDDEN.
ANY PART OF BODY OR LOAD, SHALL EXCEED 90 INCHES."
NOT ACTED.  HALL V. DECUIR, 95 U.S. 485, 497-498; WABASH, ST. L. & P.R.
WHICH COMPARE GEER V. CONNECTICUT, 161 U.S. 519, AND NEW YORK EX REL.
SEE WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH CO. V. KANSAS, 216 U.S. 1, 27 ET SEQ.
GLOUCESTER FERRY CO. V. PENNSYLVANIA, 114 U.S. 196, 205; ROBBINS V.
SHELBY COUNTY TAXING DISTRICT, 120 U.S. 489, 499.
LOCAL SAFETY, SMITH V. ALABAMA, 124 U.S. 465; NASHVILLE, C. & ST. L.R.
U.S. 628; CHICAGO, R.I. & P.R. CO. V. ARKANSAS, 219 U.S. 453; ST.
LOUIS, I.M. & S.R. CO. V. ARKANSAS, 240 U.S. 518; CF. HENNINGTON V.
IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF SAFETY, HAS BEEN HELD TO BE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
SEABOARD AIR LINE RY. V. BLACKWELL, 244 U.S. 310.
CREEK MARSH CO., 2 PET. 245; EX PARTE MCNIEL, 13 WALL.  236; POUND V.
119 U.S. 543; CF. SANDS V. MANISTEE RIVER IMPROVEMENT CO., 123 U.S.
288; APPROVE THE ERECTION OF BRIDGES OVER NAVIGABLE STREAMS, GILMAN V.
COOLEY V. BOARD OF PORT WARDENS, 12 HOW.  299; STEAMSHIP CO. V.
JOLIFFE, 2 WALL.  450; ANDERSON V. PACIFIC COAST S.S. CO., 225 U.S.
CO. V. MINNESOTA, 248 U.S. 158; MINTZ V. BALDWIN, 289 U.S. 346; CF.
OF DOMESTIC GAME, GEER V. CONNECTICUT, 161 U.S. 519; NEW YORK EX REL.
SILZ V. HESTERBERG, 211 U.S. 31; CF. FOSTER-FOUNTAIN PACKING CO. V.
CONSIDERATION OR DECISION OF THIS CASE.

References: V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.