Source: https://misesjournal.org.br/misesjournal/article/view/329
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 10:11:06+00:00

Document:
This paper deals with the debate regarding the sufficiency of Misesian praxeology for the elucidation of economic phenomena and their compatibility with the Hayekian theory of communication and the acquisition of knowledge in specific institutional contexts, as both were developed from the debate of the economic calculation, occurred in the decades of 1920 and 1930. In this sense, the two groups that led the debate were formed, on the one hand, by those who argue that the Austrian School was divided between the Misesian and Hayekian paradigms and, on the other, those who argue that the core of the Austrian distinctive approach is based on both Mises and Hayek.
ARIDA, Persio. A história do pensamento econômico como teoria e retórica. PUC-Rio, 1983.
BARBIERI, Fábio. O ressurgimento da escola austríaca e a teoria de processo de mercado. Revista Econômica, v. 10, n. 2, 2008.
BARBIERI, Fábio. História do debate do cálculo econômico socialista. Instituto Ludwig von Mises Brasil, São Paulo, 2013.
BOETTKE, Peter J. The theory of spontaneous order and cultural evolution in the social theory of FA Hayek. Cultural Dynamics, p.61-83, 1990.
BOETTKE, Peter J. Economic Calculation. The Austrian contribution to political economy. Advances in Austrian Economics. George Mason University, v. 5, p.131-158, 1998.
BOETTKE, Peter J. Teaching Austrian Economics to Graduate Students. Journal of economics and finance education, v. 10, n. 2, p. 19, 2011.
BOETTKE, Peter J.; COYNE, Christopher J.; NEWMAN, Patrick. The History of a Tradition: Austrian Economics from 1871 to 2016. In: Research in the History of Economic Thought and Methodology. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2016.
CALDWELL, Bruce J. Hayek's transformation. History of Political Economy, v.20, n. 4, p.513-541, 1988.
CALDWELL, Bruce. Hayek's challenge: An intellectual biography of FA Hayek. University of Chicago Press, 2008.
HAYEK, F. A. Monetary Theory and the Trade Cycle; Translated from the German by N. Kaldor and HM Croome. Jonathan Cape, 1933.
HAYEK, F. A. The present state of the debate. Collectivist economic planning, George Routledge & Sons, Ltd. p. 201-243, 1935. In: HAYEK, F. A. Individualism and economic order. University of Chicago Press, 1948.
HAYEK, F. A. Economics and knowledge. Economica, v. 4, n. 13, p. 33-54, 1937. In: HAYEK, F. A. Individualism and economic order. University of Chicago Press, 1948.
HAYEK, F. A. Scientism and the study of society. Part I. Economica, v. 9, n. 35, p. 267-291, 1943. In: HAYEK, F. A.. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 1979.
HAYEK, F. A. The use of knowledge in society. The American Economic Review, p. 519-530, 1945. In: HAYEK, F. A. Individualism and economic order. University of Chicago Press, 1948.
HAYEK, F. A. Individualism: true and false. Hodges, Figgis & Company, 1946. In: HAYEK, F. A. Individualism and economic order. University of Chicago Press, 1948.
HAYEK, F. A. Degrees of explanation. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, v. 6, n. 23, p. 209-225, 1955. In: HAYEK, F. A. Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. University of Chicago Press, 1967.
HAYEK, F. A. Rules, perception and intelligibility. Oxf. University Press, 1962. In: HAYEK, F. A. Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. University of Chicago Press, 1967.
HAYEK, F. A. Kinds of rationalism. The Economic Studies Quarterly, v. 15, n.2, p. 1-12, 1965. In: HAYEK, F. A. Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. University of Chicago Press, 1967.
HAYEK, F. A.. The Counter-Revolution of Science: Studies on the Abuse of Reason, Indianapolis, Liberty Fund, 1979.
HAYEK, F.A. Letter to Hutchinson. Hoover Institution, 1981. Apud CALDWELL, Bruce. Hayek's challenge: An intellectual biography of FA Hayek. University of Chicago Press, 2008.
HERBENER, Jeffrey M. Calculation and the Question of Arithmetic. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 9, n. 1, p. 151-162, 1996.
HOPPE, Hans-Hermann. Socialism: A property or knowledge problem?. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 9, n. 1, p. 143-149, 1996.
HORWITZ, Steven. Monetary calculation and Mises's Critique of Planning. History of Political Economy, v. 30, n. 3, p. 427, 1998.
HÜLSMANN, Jörg Guido. Knowledge, judgment, and the use of property. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 10, n. 1, p. 23-48, 1997.
HÜLSMANN, Jörg Guido. Mises: The last knight of liberalism. Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2007.
KIRZNER, Israel M. The economic calculation debate: lessons for Austrians. The Review of Austrian economics, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1-18, 1988.
KIRZNER, Israel M. Competition and entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, 2015.
LACHMANN, Ludwig M. From Mises to Shackle: an essay on Austrian economics and the kaleidic society. Journal of economic literature, v. 14, n. 1, p. 54-62, 1976. In: PRYCHITKO, David L. (Ed.). Why economists disagree: An introduction to the alternative schools of thought. SUNY Press, 1998.
LEESON, Peter T.; BOETTKE, Peter J. Was Mises Right?. Review of Social Economy, v. 64, p.247-265. 2006.
LEWIS, Paul A. Hayek: from economics as equilibrium analysis to economics as social theory. Edward Elgar Publishing, p.1-24. 2014.
LUDWIG VON MISES INSTITUTE: Disponível em https://mises.org/about- mises/what-is-the-mises-Institute, acessado em 24 de outubro de 2017.
MENGER, Carl. Principles of Economics. James Dingwall and Bert F. Hoselitz, trans. New York University, 1976.
MISES, Ludwig von. Theory and history. Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1985.
MISES, Ludwig von. Human action. Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2004.
MISES, Ludwig von. The theory of money and credit. Skyhorse Publishing, Inc.,2013.
MISES, Ludwig von. Socialism: An economic and sociological analysis. Lulu Press, Inc., 2015.
MISES, Ludwig von. Economic calculation in the socialist commonwealth. Lulu Press, Inc., 2016.
O'DRISCOLL JR, G.P.; RIZZO, M.J. Austrian economics re-examined: the economics of time and ignorance. Routledge, 1996.
ROTHBARD, Murray N. The end of socialism and the calculation debate revisited. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 5, n. 2, p.51-76. 1991.
SALERNO, Joseph T. Ludwig von Mises as social rationalist. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 4, n. 1, p. 26-54, 1990.
SALERNO, Joseph T. Mises and Hayek dehomogenized. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 6, n. 2, 1993.
SALERNO, Joseph T. Reply to Leland B. Yeager on “Mises and Hayek on Calculation and Knowledge”. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 7, n. 2, p. 111-125, 1994.
SELGIN, G. Praxeology and Understanding. Auburn: Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1990.
SIMPLE IMPACT FACTOR FOR JOURNALS. Disponível em https://ideas.repec.org/top/top.journals.simple.html, acessado em 24 de outubro de 2017.
THE REVIEW OF AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/journal/11138, acessado em 24 de outubro de 2017.
VAUGHN, Karen I. Austrian economics in America: The migration of a tradition. Cambridge University Press, 1998.
YEAGER, Leland B. Mises and Hayek on calculation and knowledge. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 7, n. 2, p. 93-109, 1994.
YEAGER, Leland B. Calculation and knowledge: Let's write finis. The Review of Austrian Economics, v. 10, n. 1, p. 133-136, 1997.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.