Source: https://www.salvatolawoffices.com/practice-areas/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 16:32:43+00:00

Document:
We have successfully handled appeals before the California Court of Appeal, California Superior Court, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit, District Court, and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, a number of which have resulted in published opinions.
Asset Management Holdings, LLC v. Aleli A. Hernandez, Appeal No. 17-60044 (9th Cir. February 25, 2019) - The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel and the Bankruptcy Court’s orders determining that SLO’s client was eligible for Chapter 13 relief under Bankruptcy Code § 109(e), and finding that the bankruptcy petition was filed in good faith.
(BAP 9th Cir. Apr. 11, 2017) - The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's Orders confirming the debtor's Chapter 13 Plan and denying the lienholder's motion to dismiss on eligibility grounds under Bankruptcy Code § 109(e).
Hai Lecong v. Ashley Tran, No. 15-60039 (9th Cir. Feb. 13, 2017) - The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's Order granting summary judgment, determining that a state court judgment in favor of our client was excepted from the debtor's discharge under Bankruptcy Code § 523(a)(2) based upon the doctrine of issue preclusion.
Dhawan v. Biring, 241 Cal.App.4th 963 (Cal. App. 2d Dist. 2015) - The California Court of Appeal affirmed the Los Angeles Superior Court's Order vacating and setting aside a $3,200,000 default judgment-- entered more than seven years earlier--where the judgment was void and subject to collateral attack at any time in accordance with California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 473(d) and 580.
In re First T.D. & Investments, Inc. (Neilson v. Chang), 253 F.3d 520 (9th Cir. 2001) - In reversing the District Court, the Ninth Circuit held that California Business and Professions Code § 10233.2 applied to an assigned promissory note and deed of trust, deeming the security interests perfected. Therefore, the trustee's avoidance action under Bankruptcy Code § 544 failed.
In re Cobe (Smith v. Cobe), 229 B.R. 15 (BAP 9th Cir. 1998) - The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the Bankruptcy Court's grant of summary judgment based on issue preclusion, where summary judgment was conditioned on affirmance of the state court judgment after jury trial by the California Court of Appeal.
Plotkin v. Pomona Valley Imports (In re Cohen), 199 B.R. 709 (B.A.P. 9th Cir. Cal. 1996) - The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel affirmed the Bankruptcy Court’s grant of summary judgment in two related cases involving defense of alleged fraudulent transfer in a Ponzi scheme involving the sale of late model Mercedes Benz cars to Hollywood movie stars and entertainment executives.
Great Central Mortgage Acceptance Co., Ltd.
Property Tax Assistance Co., Inc.
Statewide Direct Insurance Services, INc.
Copyright © 2019 Salvato Law Offices. All Rights Reserved. Disclaimer.

References: v. 
 § 109
 § 109
 v. 
 § 523
 v. 
 v. 
 § 10233
 § 544
 v. 
 v.