Source: http://www.carsandracingstuff.com/library/government/321US67.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 17:47:20+00:00

Document:
Case:   MCLEAN TRUCKING CO. V. U.S.
THE FINDINGS AND THE EVIDENCE.  P. 88.
PRESENTED BY THE MODIFIED ORDERS.  P. 70.
ANTITRUST LAWS AND POLICIES.  P. 77.
ARE NECESSARY IN ORDER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE SERVICE TO THE PUBLIC.  P.
OBJECTIVES OF THE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION POLICY.  P. 85.
PRESCRIBED BY CONGRESS.  P. 89.
HERE REQUIRE THAT ITS CONCLUSIONS BE SET ASIDE.  P. 89.
CONSIDERED WHEN SUCH CHANGE OCCURS.  P. 91.
MCLEAN TRUCKING CO. ET AL. V. UNITED STATES ET AL.
SET ASIDE ORDERS OF THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION, 38 M.C.C. 137.
SEC. 214 OF THE MOTOR CARRIER ACT OF 1935(49 U.S.C. SEC. 314; 49 STAT.
CARRIERS AND FOUR ASSOCIATED NONCARRIERS.
THE MERGER DEFENDED THE COMMISSION'S ORDER.
QUESTIONS IN FAVOR OF THE MERGER, AS DID THE DISTRICT COURT.
AS MODIFIED.  THEY PRESENT THE ONLY QUESTIONS FOR OUR CONSIDERATION.
IN SUBSTANTIAL INJURY TO THE CARRIER EMPLOYEES AFFECTED.
AND THE RAILROADS, WAS SUBSTANTIALLY REDUCED.
THAT THE MERGER "WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PUBLIC INTEREST."  SEC.
EXERCISE ANY CONTROL OR FRANCHISES ACQUIRED THROUGH SUCH TRANSACTION."
ADVANTAGE IN ITS OPERATIONS AND WILL NOT UNDULY RESTRAIN COMPETITION."
AS IF THE EXEMPTION DID NOT EXIST.
1935 OR AT THE TIME OF ANY SUBSEQUENT LEGISLATION AFFECTING THEM.
CARRIERS IN THE MANNER URGED WOULD NULLIFY ITS OPERATION AS TO THEM.
BY CONGRESS, WHATEVER MAY BE OUR VIEWS OF THE WISDOM OF ITS ACTION.
WHICH DEALS SPECIFICALLY WITH TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES AND PROBLEMS.
THE BASIC DETERMINANTS OF ITS ACTION.
VIEW.  WHEN THIS IS TRUE, IT CANNOT, WITHOUT MORE, IGNORE THE LATTER.
WITH WHICH THE COMMISSION IS PRIMARILY AND DIRECTLY CONCERNED.  CF.
CENTRAL SECURITIES CORP. V. UNITED STATES, 287 U.S. 12.
CENTRAL SECURITIES CORP. V. UNITED STATES, 287 U.S. 12, 25.
NATIONAL DEFENSE."  54 STAT. 899.
PUBLIC WHICH ULTIMATELY BEARS THE LOSS."  CF. TEXAS & PACIFIC RY. CO.
V. GULF, C. & S.F. RY. CO., 270 U.S. 266, 277.
"INADEQUATE" TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES ARE SOUGHT TO BE MADE "ADEQUATE"
COMMISSION IN PASSING ON A PROPOSED MERGER TO IGNORE THEIR POLICY.
TRANSPORTATION, BUT IN ITS COORDINATION OF ALL OTHER FORMS."  79 CONG.
COMMISSION V. ILLINOIS CENTRAL R. CO., 215 U.S. 452; PENNSYLVANIA CO.
SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE, IT IS NOT OUR FUNCTION TO UPSET ITS ORDER.
TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS AND ANALOGOUS TRANSACTIONS.
REQUIRES, ON THIS RECORD, THAT ITS CONCLUSIONS BE OVERTURNED.
QUESTION IS PRESENTED BY THE ORDERS NOW UNDER REVIEW.
SUCH PERSON WILL BE MANAGED IN THE INTEREST OF SUCH OTHER CARRIER."
PROHIBITION MAY BE CONSIDERED WHEN IT ARISES.
FN1  28 U.S.C. SECS. 44, 47, 47A, 345.
QUALIFIED BY THE IMPOSITION OF CERTAIN CONDITIONS NOT HERE RELEVANT.
ENGLAND TERMINALS, INC. (ASSOCIATED WITH MCCARTHY).
BUT CONSOLIDATED ALONE OPERATES BETWEEN THOSE AREAS AND NEW YORK CITY.
COMPETES SOMEWHAT WITH THEM IN THAT AREA.
HOLDERS, ON TERMS NOT HERE RELEVANT.
THE REMAINDER BY STOCKHOLDERS IN THE CORPORATIONS TO BE MERGED.
REASONABLE IN THE PREMISES:  ..
OPERATED BY ANY OTHER SUCH CARRIER, AND TERMINALS INCIDENTAL THERETO.
TRANSACTION; AND (4) THE INTEREST OF THE CARRIER EMPLOYEES AFFECTED.
.         .         .         .         .
SUCH PERSON WILL BE MANAGED IN THE INTEREST OF SUCH OTHER CARRIER.
FN8  "AFFILIATED THEREWITH" IS DEFINED IN SEC. 5(6), SUPRA NOTE 7.
(1940) CH. 18 ET SEQ.
1933, 48 STAT. 211, AND THE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1940, 54 STAT. 898.
POLICY, NATIONAL RESOURCES PLANNING BOARD (MAY, 1942) 197.
FN11  THE NEW ENGLAND DIVISIONS CASE, 261 U.S. 184, 189.
COMMERCE ACT AND FEDERAL ANTI-TRUST LAWS (1904) 121-122.
FN13  THE NEW ENGLAND DIVISIONS CASE, 261 U.S. 184, 189.
TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1940, 54 STAT. 898, 929.
FN15  SEN. REP. NO. 482, 74TH CONG., 1ST SESS., 3.
CARRIERS IN THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THIS PART."  49 STAT.
TEMPORARY NATIONAL ECONOMIC COMMITTEE, 76TH CONG., 3D SESS., 268.
PROFITABLE BASIS."  H. DOC. 89, 74TH CONG., 1ST SESS. (1934) 127.
TRANSPORTATION, CITED SUPRA NOTE 17.
FN19  SEN. REP. NO. 482, 74TH CONG., 1ST SESS.; 79 CONG. REC. 12206.
SEQ., 48 STAT. 1102, 49 STAT. 1526-1528; 31 I.C.C. 32, 61; 31 I.C.C.
351, 413-414; AND SEC. 5(1) OF THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE ACT, 41 STAT.
ACT OF 1935, 49 STAT. 555-556, 52 STAT. 1239, (AND CF. 86 CONG. REC.
11546) WITH THAT OF SEC. 5 OF THE TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1940.
IMPELLING THE AUTHORIZATION OF CONSOLIDATION OF MOTOR CARRIERS.
TRANSPORTATION ACT OF 1920(1923) 275-292.
FN25  CF. NOTE 17 SUPRA.
LOCAL IMPORTANCE."  79 CONG. REC. 5654-5655.
SHIFTED QUICKLY TO MEET PEAK DEMANDS ON CERTAIN ROUTES, ETC.
SYSTEM" WHICH IS "ADEQUATE TO MEET" THE NATIONAL NEEDS.  54 STAT. 899.
ENFORCEMENT OF ITS PROVISIONS "WHERE APPLICABLE TO COMMON CARRIERS."
WHERE THE TRANSPORTATION NEED IS CLEAR.
TURN BACK THE CLOCK ONCE SUCH A TREND GETS UNDER WAY.
INTEREST" IN THE PAST AS NOT TO BE DISREGARDED TODAY.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 

V. 
 V.