Source: https://neifeld.com/
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 15:06:32+00:00

Document:
Click the button below to select from Neifeld IP Law's email lists on relevant areas of law and practice.
Rick is admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the Courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC), the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Chair of the FCBA PTAB and TTAB committee. Former chair of the FCBA PTAB subcommittee. Former Vice Chair of the AIPLA PCT Issues Committee. Former chair of the AIPLA Interference Committee (now the PTAB Trials committee) and that committee’s Services Subcommittee. Member of the AIPLA, FCBA, ASIPI, and Virginia Patent Lawyers Club. Substantial experience with PTAB AIA; patent interferences; petitions; appeals; reexaminations, and reissues proceedings in the USPTO; in PCT international applications and foreign regional and national patent prosecution. Due diligence including investigations, database searching, and opinions.
Widely published in IP law publications, frequent lecturer to patent attorneys on patent law topics, and an active member of the patent bar associations. Founder and moderator for the popular "PatentInterPartes" group on the http://groups.yahoo.com/group/patentinterpartes/ web site, which is a forum for general information on patent law and practice with a focus on PTAB trial and patent interference issues.
Co-founder of the former PatentValuePredictor automated patent valuation service, co-inventor of the underlying macro-economic model for valuing patents (now patented as US patent 7,676,375), and programmer of some of the code powering the automated valuations.
Dr. Neifeld did his post doctoral work at Rutgers University, and then worked as a staff scientist at the U.S. Army's Laboratory Command for several years before entering the field of law. His research focused on applied physics areas of electro-optics, III-V materials, microwaves, vacuum deposition technology, superconductors, and electronics directed towards the U.S. Army's electronics, communication, and signal processing needs.
Proceeding IPR2017-01110 Baldwin Filters, Inc. v. Donaldson Company, Inc.
Proceeding IPR2017-01061 Kyocera International, Inc. v. Blue Spike, LLC.
Proceeding IPR2015-00908 AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch, Ltd.
Proceeding IPR2015-00710 AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch, Ltd.
Proceeding IPR2015-00713 AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch, Ltd.
Proceeding IPR2015-00101 AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch, Ltd.
Proceeding IPR2014-01361 AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch, Ltd.
Proceeding IPR2014-00697 AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch, Ltd.
Robert is admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the Courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the District of Columbia, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC).
Robert has a Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry from Harvard University (1989) under the direction of Nobel Laureate E.J. Corey. Prior to obtaining an advanced degree he worked as a research chemist at Merck and Co.
E.J. Corey, S. Ohuchida and Robert W. Hahl, Total Synthesis of C-22 Prostanoids in the E and F Series, J. Amer. Chem Soc., 1984,106, 3875.
E.J. Corey, J. Gregory Reid, Andrew G. Myers and Robert W. Hahl, A Simple Synthetic Route to the Limonoid System, J. Amer. Chem Soc., 1987, 109, 918-919.
E.J. Corey and Robert W. Hahl, Synthesis of a Limonoid, Azadiradione, Tetrahedron Letters, Vol. 30, No. 23, pp. 3023-3026, 1989.
Robert W. Hahl, Total Synthesis of Azadiradioine and Total Synthesis of C-22 Prostanoids in the E and F series Based on Docosahexaenoic Acid, - Ph.D., Thesis, 1989, Harvard University.
Robert W. Hahl, The Size and Shape of Hydrogen Atoms in Organic Compounds: A survey of interatomic distances in x-ray crystal structures, Undergraduate Thesis, Stevens Institute of Technology, 1980.
Twenty five years experience in patent law, involving a wide range of chemical technologies, including pharmaceuticals, genetic engineering, polymers, and semiconductors.
Patent interference use of monoclonal antibodies for treatment of neurodegenerative diseases; TACT, Inc.
Patent interference semiconductor imaging devices; ASML Lithography N.V.
IPR2015-01086 Coalition For Affordable Drugs V LLC v. Biogen IDEC International GmbH. Inter Partes Review on the use of dimethyl fumarate in pharmaceutical preparations.
IPR2015-01136 Coalition For Affordable Drugs V LLC v. Biogen MA Inc. Inter Partes Review on treatment of multiple sclerosis using dimethyl fumarate, monomethyl fumarate, or a combination thereof.
IPR2014-00728 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Inter Partes Review on an integrated, multi-standard television receiver.
IPR2014-00809 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Inter Partes Review on a broadband television signal receiver.
IPR2014-00881 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Inter Partes Review on an integrated television tuner circuit.
IPR2015-00591 Maxlinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Inter Partes Review on an integrated, multi-standard television receiver.
IPR2015-00592 Maxlinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Inter Partes Review on an integrated, multi-standard television receiver.
IPR2015-00593 Maxlinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Inter Partes Review on an integrated, multi-standard television receiver.
IPR2015-00594 Maxlinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Inter Partes Review on an integrated, multi-standard television receiver.
IPR2015-00615 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Inter Partes Review on an integrated, multi-standard television receiver.
IPR2015-00626 Silicon Laboratories, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation. Inter Partes Review on a broadband television signal receiver.
IPR2015-00710 AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch, Ltd. Inter Partes Review on feedthrough capacitor filter assemblies with laminar flow delaminations.
IPR2015-00713 AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch, Ltd. Inter Partes Review on device to protect an active implantable medical device feedthrough capacitor.
IPR2015-00943 Ardagh Glass Inc. v. Culchrome, LLC. Inter Partes Review on method for recycling mixed colored cutlet glass into new glass products.
IPR2015-00944 Ardagh Glass Inc. v. Culchrome, LLC. Inter Partes Review on method of creating recycled glass products.
Bruce is admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office and the Courts of the State of Maryland and the District of Columbia.
Bruce has extensive experience in trademark opposition/cancellation settlement and litigation, and trademark prosecution; and manages the firm's trademark docket. In addition, he has substantial experience in the business methods patents areas and patent litigation support.
Daniel is admitted to practice before the Courts of the Commonwealth of Virginia, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Daniel has been the lead attorney in more than 800 cases.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.