Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Sec-493-Representation.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 02:26:08+00:00

Document:
37. In re Lynch's Estate, 132 Cal. 214, 64 Pac. 284; Ector v. Grant, 112 Ga. 557, 53 L. R. A. 723, 37 S. E. 984; Aldridge v. Montgomery, 9 Ind. 302; Anderson v. Bell, 140 Ind. 375, 29 L. R. A. 541, 39 N. E. 735; Neely v. Wise, 44 Iowa, 544; Clay v. Cousins, 1 T. B. Mon. (Ky.) 75 Sheffield v. Lovering, 12 Mass. 489; Rowley v. Stray, 32 Mich. 70: Prescott v. Carr, 29 N. H.
453, 61 Am. Dec. 632; Beebee v. Griffing, 14 N. Y. 235; Stockton v. Frazier, 81 Ohio St. 227, 90 N. E. 168; Edwards v. Barks-dale, 2 Hill Eq. 416; Baker v. Chalfant, 5 Whart. 477; Lynch's Appeal, 132 Pa. St. 422, 19 Atl. 281; Marlow v. King, 17 Tex. 177.
38. 2 Blackst. Comm. 217.
39. 1 Stimson's Am. St. Law, Sec. 3138.
Ordinarily, if the statute expressly provides that certain classes of relatives shall take by representation, that doctrine cannot apply in favor of others.42 And a provision that the property shall, in a certain con39a. 1 Woerner, Administration, Sec. 71; 1 Dembitz, Land Titles, Sec. 35.
40. Porter v. Askew, 11 Gill. & J. 346; Clary v. Watkins, 64 Neb. 386, 89 N. W. 1042; Johnston v. Chesson, 6 Jones Eq. (59 N. C.) 146. And first cousins to the exclusion of children of first cousins. Adee v. Campbell, 79 N. Y. 52; In re Clendaniel's Estate, 12 Phila. 54.
41. Hoffman v. Watson, 109 Md. 532, 72 Atl. 479.
42. Curry's Estate, 39 Cal. 529; Quinby v. Higgins. 14 Me. 309; Bigelow v. Morong, 103 Mass. 287; In re Chapoton's Estate, 104 Mich. 11, 53 Am. St. Rep. 454, 61 N. W. 892; Douglas v. Cameron, 47 Neb. 358, 66 N. W. 430; Clayton v. Drake, 17 Ohio St. 367; Brenneman's Appeal, 40 Pa. St. 115; North v. Valk, Dud. Eq. (S. C.) 212; In re Robert's Estate, 84 Wash. 163, 146 Pac. 398.
43. In re Nigro's Estate, 172 Cal. 474, 156 Pac. 1019; Van Cleve v. Van Fossen, 73 Mich. 342, 41 N. W. 258; Conant v. Kent, 130 Mass. 178; Douglas v. Cameron, 47 Neb. 358, 60 N. \V. 430; Schenck v. Vail, 24 N. J. Eq. 538; In re Sullivan's Estate, 48 Wash. 631, 94 Pac. 483, 95 Pac. 71.
Ark. 52, 9 S. W. 435; Houston v. Davidson, 45 Ga. 574; Cox v. Cox, 44 Ind. 368; Doane v. Freeman, 15 Me. 113; Mccomas v. Amos, 29 Md. 132; Balch v. Stone, 149 Mass. 39, 20 N. E. 322; Erast v. Freeman's Estate, 129 Mich. 271, 88 N. W. Jones v. Barnett, 30 Tex. 637; 2 Blackst. Comm. 117.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.