Source: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjournal/239/156.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 12:01:26+00:00

Document:
1. Lord CotterBrian Joseph Michael Cotter, Esquire, having been created Baron Cotter, of Congresbury in the County of Somerset, for life by Letters Patent dated in the forenoon of 30th May 2006, was introduced between the Lord Redesdale and the Baroness Northover, the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod and Garter King of Arms preceding; and took and subscribed the oath pursuant to statute (see Appendix 2).
2. Lord Taylor of HolbeachJohn Derek Taylor, Esquire, CBE, having been created Baron Taylor of Holbeach, of South Holland in the County of Lincolnshire, for life by Letters Patent dated in the forenoon of 31st May 2006, was introduced between the Baroness Byford and the Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts, the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod and Garter King of Arms preceding; and took and subscribed the oath pursuant to statute (see Appendix 3).
3. Kay and others and another (FC) (Appellants) v. London Borough of Lambeth and others (Respondents)Further to the Order of the House of Wednesday 8th March 2006 (41st Report Session 200506;  UKHL 10), it was ordered that the appellants do pay or cause to be paid the costs of the London Borough of Lambeth, first respondents, in this House, the amount which it is reasonable for them to pay to include one leading counsel and two junior counsel and to be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments in accordance with section 11 of the Access to Justice Act 1999 and the regulations made thereunder; that the costs of the appellants in this House be taxed in accordance with the Access to Justice Act 1999, such costs to include one leading counsel and two junior counsel; and that, on the question of costs in the courts below, the Order of Her Majestys Court of Appeal of 20th July 2004 and also the Orders of His Honour Judge Cooke sitting at Central London County Court of 13th December 2002 and 19th December 2003 be affirmed.
4. In re G (children) (England)The appeal of CG was presented and it was ordered that in accordance with Standing Order VI the statement and appendix thereto be lodged on or before 17th July (lodged 25th May).
5. Ceredigion County Council (Respondents) v. Jones (FC) and others (FC) (Appellants) (England)The appeal of Matthew Eifion Jones, Byron Rees and Aled James was presented and it was ordered that in accordance with Standing Order VI the statement and appendix thereto be lodged on or before 17th July.
6. KM (Petitioner) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department (Respondent)The petition of KM praying for leave to appeal was presented and referred to an Appeal Committee (lodged 31st May).
7. Her Majestys Revenue and Customs (Petitioners) v. Edinburghs Telford College (Respondents)The petition of the Commissioners for Her Majestys Revenue and Customs praying for leave to appeal notwithstanding that the time limited by Standing Order II has expired was presented and referred to an Appeal Committee.
8. Riverside Housing Association Limited (Appellants) v. White (FC) and another (FC) (Respondents)The petition of the Housing Corporation praying for leave to intervene in the said appeal was presented and referred to an Appeal Committee.
9. Masri (Respondent) v. Consolidated Contractors International (UK) Limited and others (Appellants)The appeal was set down for hearing and referred to an Appellate Committee (lodged 31st May).
10. Moncrieff (AP) and another (AP) (Respondents) v. Jamieson and others (Appellants) (Scotland)The appeal was set down for hearing and referred to an Appellate Committee (lodged 1st June).
11. Kola (FC) and another (FC) (Appellants) v. Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Respondent)The petition of the appellants praying that the time for lodging the statement and appendix and setting down the cause for hearing might be extended to 7th July (the agents for the respondent consenting thereto) was presented; and it was ordered as prayed (lodged 26th May).
12. Scrabster Harbour Trust (Appellants) v. Mowlem plc (trading as Mowlem Marine) (Respondents) (Scotland)The petition of the appellants praying that the time for lodging the statement and appendix and setting down the cause for hearing might be extended to 31st July (the agents for the respondents consenting thereto) was presented; and it was ordered as prayed.
13. Mowlem Marine (Respondents) v. Scrabster Harbour Trust (formerly known as Trustees of the Harbour of Scrabster) (Appellants) (Scotland)The petition of the appellants praying that the time for lodging the statement and appendix and setting down the cause for hearing might be extended to 31st July (the agents for the respondents consenting thereto) was presented; and it was ordered as prayed.
14. Wilson (Respondent) v. Jaymarke Estates Limited and another (Appellants) (Scotland)The petition of the appellants praying that the time for lodging the statement and appendix and setting down the cause for hearing might be extended to 3rd July (the agents for the respondent consenting thereto) was presented; and it was ordered as prayed.
15. Jones (Respondent) v. Garnett (Her Majestys Inspector of Taxes) (Appellant)The petition of the appellant praying that the time for lodging the statement and appendix and setting down the cause for hearing might be extended to 17th July (the agents for the respondent consenting thereto) was presented; and it was ordered as prayed.
16. Scrabster Harbour Trust (Appellants) v. Mowlem plc (trading as Mowlem Marine) (Respondents) (Scotland)It was ordered that the appellants be allowed to prosecute the appeal without giving the usual security for costs as required by Standing Order.
17. Mowlem Marine (Respondents) v. Scrabster Harbour Trust (formerly known as Trustees of the Harbour of Scrabster) (Appellants) (Scotland)It was ordered that the appellants be allowed to prosecute the appeal without giving the usual security for costs as required by Standing Order.
2. Draft Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Directed Surveillance and Covert Human Intelligence Sources) (Amendment) Order 2006.
4. Draft Water and Sewerage Services (Miscellaneous Provisions) (Northern Ireland) Order 2006, laid under the Northern Ireland Act 2000, together with an Explanatory Memorandum.
2. Electromagnetic Compatibility (Amendment) Regulations 2006, laid under the European Communities Act 1972.
30. Police and Justice BillIt was moved by the Baroness Scotland of Asthal that the bill be now read a second time; after debate, the motion was agreed to and the bill was committed to a Committee of the Whole House.
31. Ageing: Scientific Aspects (Science and Technology Report)The Grand Committee reported that it had considered the Report.
32. History teachingThe Lord Luke asked Her Majestys Government whether the teaching of history in schools in England and Wales is satisfactory; after debate, the question was answered by the Lord Adonis.
Ageing: Scientific Aspects (Science and Technology Report)It was moved by the Lord Sutherland of Houndwood that the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Report of the Science and Technology Committee on Ageing: Scientific Aspects; after debate, the motion was agreed to.
The Committee was adjourned at five minutes before six oclock.

References: v. 
 UKHL 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.