Source: http://fl.bna.com/fl/19990202/880.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 14:31:20+00:00

Document:
Circuit Court for Baltimore City.  Multiple issues were raised.
rendered.  We deny this motion to dismiss on the basis of Dietz.
The parties were married on July 11, 1992, in Baltimore City.
Michael Cusack until Garrett's eighteenth birthday . . . ."
the final judgment)".  We agree.
which party should be awarded custody.
756 (1970)(per curiam); Goldschmiedt v.
predecessors' opinions, see, e.g., Melton v.
(1971), and its progeny, see, e.g. Sartoph v.
467, 471 (1976); Vernon v. Vernon, 30 Md. App.
conclusion of the chancellor was the best one.
judge's  determination stands absent an abuse of discretion.
change in custody may disturb that stability.
a chancellor sympathetic to his or her claim.
the situation as it existed at the time of the hearing.
year period to be later determined.
Sullivan, 12 Md. App. at 17-18.
custody.  This was summed up more recently in Montgomery County v.
his custody changed upon completion of the fifth grade.
order entered into by the parties on January 12, 1998.
approval of the trial court.  We perceive no abuse of discretion.
651, 657, cert. denied, 459 U.S. 915, 103 S. Ct. 227, 74 L.Ed.2d.
180 (1982)."  Id. at 192.
under all the circumstances in any case in which a person . . .
custody, support, or visitation of a child of the parties . . . ."
This issue must be addressed.  In Scott v. Scott, 103 Md. App.
trial court never addressed Wife's request for fees and costs.
shall articulate the basis for its decision."  (Citing Bagley v.
Md. 18, 637 A.2d 1191 (1994)).
transcript page 50.  These have no relation to the issue at hand.
calculate value, citing, correctly, Deering v. Deering, 292 Md.
781, 626 A.2d 1062 (1993).
would appear that we would be obliged to affirm.
$7,008.28 monetary award in a lump sum.
That is the complete argument presented on this point.
deferred compensation plan, or both.
the future.'  McClayton v. McClayton, 68 Md.
App. 615, 622, 515 A.2d 231 (1986).
This is the first occasion upon which Mr.
live as close to one another as practicable."
privacy, travel, family and marriage.
such a move would endanger Garrett's safety.
must be addressed under the best interest of the child formula.
Child Custody and Relocation: A Constitutional Perspective, 34 U.
Louisville J. Fam. L. 1 (1995-96); Carol S. Bruch & Janet M.
2 (Fall 1997) at 14.
respected courts of last resort addressing relocation issues.
awarded physical custody of minor children" Id. 913 P.2d at 476.
day decisions about career and family.
change his or her geographical location.
Id. 913 P.2d at 483.
consideration of all of the relevant factors.
that parent's relationship with the child.
level of a deprivation of "meaningful access"
Id. at 150.  See also Frayne v. Frayne, 651 N.Y.S.2d 583, 234 A.D.
545 (N.Y. App. Div. 1996).
45 miles would have an adverse effect upon the child.
pertinent matters as each parent may deem desirable."
have imposed such a mandate.
What a given parent may regard as a "pertinent matter"
not regard it as pertinent or desirable to record the point.
in imposing this requirement, novel as it may be.
Michael filed what he termed a "contingent" cross-appeal.
filed pursuant to Md. Rule 2-534 or 2-535.
The new judgment becomes the final judgment.
effective final judgment in the case.
intervenors filed a motion to intervene and a motion to revise.
only upon a showing of fraud, mistake, or irregularity.
deprived the judgment of its finality.
303 Md. 473, 486, 494 A.2d 940, 946 (1985).
specifically testified that Mondays, after Mr.
to aggressiveness when his routine is changed.
to the young child's stress.
The court then went on to set forth the terms of modification.
We deem this contention to be without merit.
Counsel for Michael: Your Honor can [Ms.
Gentry] be put under oath?
We deem the point waived.

References: v.

 v.

 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.