Source: http://www.carsandracingstuff.com/library/government/323US459.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 04:18:48+00:00

Document:
AND INDIVIDUALS CONSTITUTING THE "BOARD OF THE DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY,"
HAD NOT CONSENTED TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT.
OFFICIALS ARE NOMINAL DEFENDANTS.  P. 464.
THOUGH URGED HERE FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THIS PROCEEDING.  P. 467.
STATE'S IMMUNITY IN THIS PROCEEDING.  P. 468.
FORD MOTOR CO. V. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY OF INDIANA ET AL.
OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIANA.  DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY V.
FEDERAL COURT, WE DO NOT DECIDE THE MERITS OF THE ISSUE.
INSURANCE CO. V. READ, 322 U.S. 47.
AND THE CITIZEN IS ALLOWED A REMEDY AGAINST THE WRONGDOER PERSONALLY.
ATCHISON, T. & S.F.R. CO. V. O'CONNOR, 223 U.S. 280; CF. MATTHEWS V.
INDIVIDUAL.  PETITIONER BROUGHT ITS ACTION IN STRICT ACCORD WITH SEC.
64-2614(A).  THE ACTION IS AGAINST THE STATE'S DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY.
THE COMPLAINT CAREFULLY DETAILS COMPLIANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SEC.
SUIT EVEN THOUGH INDIVIDUAL OFFICIALS ARE NOMINAL DEFENDANTS.  SMITH V.
RELIANCE ON SEC. 64-2614(A) AND IS A SUIT AGAINST THE STATE.
CONSENTED TO THIS ACTION AGAINST IT IN THE FEDERAL COURT.
N.E. 883.  WHILE THE STATE'S IMMUNITY FROM SUIT MAY BE WAIVED, CLARK V.
BARNARD, 108 U.S. 436, 447; GUNTER V. ATLANTIC COAST LINE, 200 U.S.
AUTHORIZATION OF SUCH WAIVER BY INDIANA IN THE PRESENT PROCEEDING.
ITS OWN CREATION MUST BE FOUND."  CF. UNITED STATES V. SHAW, 309 U.S.
THIS CASE EVEN THOUGH URGED FOR THE FIRST TIME IN THIS COURT.
STATE, SHALL EVER BE PASSED."
THE STATE'S IMMUNITY TO SUIT IN THE FEDERAL COURTS.
YEARS, TO ASSERT ANY RIGHT IN CONFLICT WITH THE PEGUES ADJUDICATION.
INFLUENCE IN DETERMINING OUR CONCLUSIONS.  GREAT NORTHERN INSURANCE CO.
COMPLAINT FOR WANT OF CONSENT BY THE STATE TO THIS SUIT.
ACTS, 1933, CH. 4, SEC. 13; INDIANA ACTS, 1941, CH. 4 AND CH. 13, SECS.
2, 8; TUCKER V. STATE, 218 IND. 614, 35 N.E.2D 270.
FN2  BURNS, INDIANA STAT. ANN. SEC. 64-2602(1943 REPLACEMENT).
FN4  FORD MOTOR CO. V. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY, 141 F.2D 24.
FN6  SEE NOTE 3 SUPRA, SEC. 64-2614(A).
FN7  BURNS, INDIANA STAT. ANN. SEC. 64-2614(B)(1943 REPLACEMENT).
BOARD OF FINANCE BY THE ACTS, 1941, CH. 27, OR OTHERWISE.
RATHER THAN WITH THE COLLECTION AND REFUND OF TAXES.
LEGISLATURE CONSENTED TO SUIT AGAINST THE STATE IN A STATE COURT ONLY.
SEE SMITH V. REEVES, 178 U.S. 436, 441.
COUNTY, INDIANA, TO HEAR AND DETERMINE SUCH ACTION  .."
ORDER AND UNDER THE DIRECTION OF THE DEPARTMENT."
106 IND. 435, 7 N.E. 379.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THIS STATE."
PETITIONER'S SUIT IS BROUGHT.  SEE NOTE 11, SUPRA.
WAIVE STATE IMMUNITY FROM SUIT.  DESERET WATER, OIL & IRR.  CO. V.
CALIFORNIA, 202 F. 498; TITLE GUARANTY & SURETY CO. V. GUERNSEY, 205 F.
STATES V. SHAW, 309 U.S. 495, 501.
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF PUERTO RICO COULD WAIVE ITS SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY.

References: V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V. 
 V.

 V.

 V.

 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V.