Source: https://www.cooley.com/services/practice/venture-capital-litigation--dispute-counseling
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 18:35:22+00:00

Document:
LP v. GP: East Coast federal district court action by LP, who claimed $100 million in damages against a family of funds (whose subscribed capital totaled over $2 billion), based on alleged reckless investing, cross-fund investing, excessive valuations and self-dealing.
LP v. GP: California arbitration and Delaware Court of Chancery action brought by LP, claiming that GP breached its duties, including misallocation of expenses between GP and fund, making loans to companies immediately prior to their dissolution, fraud in overstating investment returns to induce additional capital contributions and failure to distribute public company stock in a timely manner.
GP v. GP: California state court action in which two out of 12 alleged general partners of a billion-dollar fund claimed their ouster was wrongful.
Portfolio Company v. VC: Non-California state court action in which portfolio company claimed that a specialty venture fund could not invest in its competitor without "inevitably disclosing" the portfolio company's trade secrets and confidential information (notwithstanding express carve-out for VC's right to make domain investments).
Side Fund LP v. Main Fund GP: California state court action in which side fund LP sought to rescind side fund based on adjustments to size of main fund.
VC v. VC: California state court action alleging that "new" investors improperly washed-out prior round investors.
Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Trustee v. Fund/GP: Bankruptcy court action for alleged breach of fiduciary duties and unlawful redemptions.
Receiver v. Fund/GP: California state court action brought by Delaware Court appointed receiver against investors in and board members of portfolio company.
Clawbacks: Arbitration over end-of-fund valuations to determine whether clawback provisions applied.
Disclosure of IRR data: Representation of VCs in litigation over forced disclosure by governmental investing agencies/groups of IRR data for the groups' VC investments.
Shareholder representative matters: Non-California arbitration representing VC as representative of selling shareholders, seeking from buyer of VC-backed portfolio company millions of dollars from a post-merger escrow account.
Zone of insolvency investing: California state court action over whether "zone of insolvency" bridge financing created liability on the part of the VC for the company's debts when it went bankrupt.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.