Source: http://www.christorchaos.com/?q=content/determined-not-accept-truth-truth-himself-christ-king-part-two
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 14:38:31+00:00

Document:
One Catholic politician after another has learned how to soothe their consciences by massaging them by claiming only to be “following the law” as determined by the legal positivists on the Supreme Court of the United States of America and/or by claiming to represent the “will of the people,” upon whom such latter day Pontius Pilates assert that it is “impossible” to impose “their concept of morality.” Yet others have been and continue to be so bold as to claim to be “pioneers” in behalf of “rights” (legal protection for “domestic partnerships,” including for the spiritual, moral, constitutional, legal and social atrocity that goes by the name of “gay marriage”). It is almost certainly the case, for example, that the Supreme Court of the United States of America will invent yet another “right,” that of “gay marriage,” in precisely the same manner that it invented the nonexistent “right” of married couples to purchase contraceptives in Griswold v. Connecticut, June 7, 1965, which set the stage for Roe v. Wade and Doe v, Bolton, January 22, 1973, Eisenstadt v. Baird, March 22, 1972, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey, June 29, 1992, and Hollingsworth v. Perry and United States v. Windsor, June 26, 2014. Griswold v. Connecticut, though, was the jurisprudential foundation for them all, however, as the court’s seven justice majority (Chief Justice Earl Warren and Associate Justices William O. Douglas, Tom C. Clark, John Marshall Harlan II, William Brennan—then the court’s lone Catholic justice, Byron White and Arthur Goldberg) “found” a “right to privacy” emanating from alleged “penumbras” in the Fifth, Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America. Obviously, this is exactly what Modernism’s “evolution of dogma” (labeled as “living tradition” by Karol Wojtyla/John Paul II and as the “hermeneutic of continuity” by Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI), a point that was made last on this website in Modernists Say Nothing Original.
The contemporary American exemplars of the late Joseph Bernardin’s “peace and justice” crowd are, of course, having their day now as one of their very own, Jorge Mario Bergoglio, helps to soothe their consciences by saying not a word in opposition to a child-killing bill then pending in Brazil during his visit there in July of 2013 and refusing to say anything in opposition to a “gay marriage” bill in France or to a bill that legalized after-birth child killing up to the age of eighteen in Belgium last year (see Hitler Prevails After All). And the Argentine Apostate is seeing to it that his upcoming “synod” of the family is going to have the result he has desired all along, namely, that those living in sinful relationships be permitted to receive what purports to be Holy Communion in the Protestant and Judeo-Masonic Novus Ordo liturgical service. After all, pro-contraception, pro-abortion and pro-“gay rights” Catholics have had unfettered access to what is believed to be the Most Blessed Sacrament these past fifty years since Griswold v. Connecticut was decided.
There is a perfect logic, therefore, to soothing the consciences of Catholics living in sinful relationships, whether natural or unnatural in character, as the “peace and justice” crowd has always been about indemnification of personal sin while hiding behind the black robes of the justices of the Supreme Court of the United States of America (“the law is the law”) and/or a self-righteous and morally indignant claim to the moral high ground by supporting statist programs for the “poor,” including universal health care coverage, that are premised upon recipients having full access to taxpayer-subsidized “family planning” programs. Personal sin does not matter to Jorge and his fellow revolutionaries as only “social sins” against a false concept of “charity” matters. Nothing else.
Two Belgian politicians admit for the first time openly that Cardinal Godfried Danneels tried to convince King Baudouin to sign the law on abortion in 1990. Former politicians Philippe Moureau (PS, Parti Socialiste) and Mark Eyskens (CVP, Flemish Christian Democrats) said this in a documentary for the Flemish Broadcasting Corporation VTM on April 6, 2015 (http://nieuws.vtm.be/binnenland/135916-25-jaar-abortuswet-boudewijn-onder-druk, at 2:05). According to VTM, cardinal Danneels did not want to comment.
In 1990, the 14 members of the Belgian Government - a coalition led by CVP-Prime Minister Wilfried Martens, signed one of the most liberal abortion bills in the world. King Baudouin, a devout Catholic, refused to sign this bill into law, and was temporarily considered fictitiously "incapacitated" so that the government could have the bill turned into law.
Catholics in public life today have been indemnified in their support for one moral evil after another by various and sundry officials of the counterfeit church of conciliarism, doing so at the present time with the tacit support of the ever-merciful Jorge Mario Bergoglio, a veritable Judas Isacariot who is selling out the truths of the Divine Redeemer, Christ the King, including the truth of His Social Reign over men and their nations, to placate his Talmudic friends who have promoted these very evils with such ready abandon for such a long time now.
Pro-abortion Catholics in public life, however, are not the only ones who have let their consciences make cowards of out of them. Far from it! There are numerous priests and presbyters within the structures of the counterfeit church of conciliarism who have learned to keep their mouths shut—and shut tightly—about the heresies, apostasies, blasphemies, sacrileges and other outrages that have been emanating from the mouths of conciliar “popes” and their “bishops,” Such men have reassured themselves (or have been reassured by false confessors, especially those in Opus Dei) into believing that silence is a matter of “prudence” in accord with their malformed conscience in order to carry on what they believe to be their priestly ministry and to limit the damage of the men about whom they boast of being so obedient.
This is prudence of the flesh, however, and not prudence of the spirit as nothing other than honor and glory and majesty of God must be defended with firmness and by recognizing that the Catholic Church can never be responsible for the outrages unfolding before our very eyes. Joseph Ratzinger/Benedict XVI no less offended the honor and glory and majesty of God and thus hurt the eternal and temporal good of souls than has been done since March 13, 2013, by the Argentine Apostate, Jorge Mario Bergoglio.
Yet it is that many of those who “knew better,” priest and laity alike, kept quiet as the old German Modernist by way of the “new theology condemned by Pope Pius XII in Humani Generis, August 12, 1950, Ratzinger/Benedict, publicly esteemed the symbols of false religions with his own priestly hands, made constant warfare against the very nature of dogmatic truth and made statements, whether “official” or “unofficial” in his heresy-filled books. Silence. Complete and total silence. Conscience has been used to make cowards of those who have maintained such silence in the past or who might be doing so yet in the midst of Jorge’s more visceral manner of promoting the exact same lies that have been promoted by his predecessors.
Why should non-Catholics in public life have courage to oppose the moral evils of the day without any kind of compromise and without fear of electoral consequences when the conciliar officials fear not the very just judgment of God upon their immortal souls for helping suborn those in public life who promote the four sins that cry out to Heaven for vengeance and as they, the conciliar officials, promote egregious heresies and errors that are the work of Antichrist, not of Christ the King?
 But call to mind the former days, wherein, being illuminated, you endured a great fight of afflictions.  And on the one hand indeed, by reproaches and tribulations, were made a gazingstock; and on the other, became companions of them that were used in such sort.  For you both had compassion on them that were in bands, and took with joy the being stripped of your own goods, knowing that you have a better and a lasting substance.  Do not therefore lose your confidence, which hath a great reward.
Are we willing to suffer reproaches from our relations and friends now for our embrace of the truth of our ecclesiastical situation as we make no concessions to concilairism or the officials of its false church?
May it be, my good and very few readers (and fewer donors, I should add!), that we will be found not as "the children of withdrawing unto perdition, but of faith to the saving of the soul" as we live always as the consecrated slaves of Christ the King through the Sorrowful and Immaculate Heart of Mary our Immaculate Queen.
Let us continue to celebrate Our Lord's Easter Victory over the power of sin and eternal death this Easter season will be but a foretaste of the eternal glories reserved for those who bear their fair share of hardship which the Gospel entails with patience and gratitude and love.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.