Source: https://de.scribd.com/document/106391878/Landmark-Technology-v-Ann
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 23:38:24+00:00

Document:
Official Complaint for Patent Infringement in Civil Action No. 6:12-cv-00672: Landmark Technology, LLC v. Ann Inc. Filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, no judge yet assigned. See http://news.priorsmart.com/-l6KU for more info.
Swipe Innovations v. Ingenico et. al.
LANDMARK TECHNOLOGY, LLC, Plaintiff, v. ANN INC., Defendant.
Patent and the '508 Patent, in this judicial district and elsewhere, by selling and distributing its products and services using electronic commerce systems, which, individually or in combination, incorporate and/or use subject matter claimed by the '951 Patent and the '508 Patent. FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF (Direct Infringement of the '951 Patent, in Violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a)) 10. Plaintiff refers to and incorporates herein by reference paragraphs 1-9.
actively and knowingly induced infringement of the '951 Patent, in violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(b) by, among other things, inducing its customers (the endusers of its Websites) to utilize their own computers in combination with its Websites, and incorporated and/or related systems, to search for and order information and products from its Websites in such a way as to infringe the '951 Patent.
by Defendant is willful, wanton, and deliberate, without license and with full knowledge of the '508 Patent, thereby making this an exceptional case entitling Plaintiff to attorneys' fees and enhanced damages.
Parking Space Innovations v. ABM Industries et. al.
Joao Bock Transaction Systems v. SunTrust Banks et. al.
7. Esquivel v. Ombudsman, September 17, 2002, G.R. 1372372.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.