Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/161881022/Clouding-IP-v-Dropbox
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 10:39:16+00:00

Document:
SmartPhone Technologies v. Huawei Technologies Et. Al.
Multi-Format et. al. v. Motorola Mobility et. al.
SmartPhone Technologies v. Amazon.Com et. al.
Lennon Image Technologies v. Conde Nast Publications et. al.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE CLOUDING IP, LLC, Plaintiff, v. DROPBOX, INC.
Code. This Court has original subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1331 and 1338(a).
general personal jurisdiction pursuant to due process and/or the Delaware Long Arm Statute, due to having availed itself of the rights and benefits of Delaware by incorporating under Delaware law and conducting substantial business in this forum, including: (i) at least a portion of the infringements alleged herein; and (ii) regularly doing or soliciting business, engaging in other persistent courses of conduct, and/or deriving substantial revenue from goods and services provided to individuals in Delaware and in this Judicial District. 5. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. 1391(b), 1391(c) and 1400(b).
14. On information and belief, Defendant Dropbox has infringed and continues to infringe the 799 patent by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling cloud computing products and/or services covered by one or more claims of the 799 patent. Such cloud computing products and/or services include, by way of example and without limitation, the Dropbox service, the use of which are covered by one or more claims of the 799 patent, including but not limited to claim 37. By making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling such products and services covered by one or more claims of the 799 patent, Dropbox has injured Clouding and is liable to Clouding for infringement of the 799 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271. 15. As a result of Defendant Dropboxs infringement of the 799 patent, Plaintiff Clouding has suffered monetary damages and is entitled to a money judgment in an amount adequate to compensate for Dropboxs infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Dropbox, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court. COUNT III INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 6,925,481 16. Plaintiff Clouding realleges and incorporates by reference paragraphs 1-15 above, as if fully set forth herein. 17. Plaintiff Clouding is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 6,925,481 (the 481 patent) titled Technique for Enabling Remote Data Access and Manipulation from a Pervasive Device. The 481 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on August 2, 2005. Clouding is the owner by assignment from Symantec Corporation of the 481 patent. A true and correct copy of the 481 patent is included as Exhibit C.
27. Plaintiff Clouding is the owner by assignment of United States Patent No. 6,963,908 (the 908 patent) titled System for Transferring Customized Hardware and Software Settings from One Computer to Another Computer to Provide Personalized Operating Environments. The 908 patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on November 8, 2005. Clouding is the owner by assignment from Symantec Corporation of the 908 patent. A true and correct copy of the 908 patent is included as Exhibit E. 28. Defendant Dropbox makes, uses, sells, and offers for sale in the United States products and/or services for cloud computing. On information and believe, at least some of Dropboxs cloud computing products and/or services provide or support use of a method for transporting computer-based settings, files and/or other data from one computer to another. 29. On information and belief, Defendant Dropbox has infringed and continues to infringe the 908 patent by, among other things, making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling cloud computing products and/or services covered by one or more claims of the 908 patent. Such cloud computing products and/or services include, by way of example and without limitation, the Dropbox service, the use of which are covered by one or more claims of the 908 patent, including but not limited to claim 48. By making, using, offering for sale, and/or selling such products and services covered by one or more claims of the 908 patent, Dropbox has injured Clouding and is liable to Clouding for infringement of the 908 patent pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 271. 30. As a result of Defendant Dropboxs infringement of the 908 patent, Plaintiff Clouding has suffered monetary damages and is entitled to a money judgment in an amount adequate to compensate for Dropboxs infringement, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made of the invention by Dropbox, together with interest and costs as fixed by the Court.
circumstances. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff Clouding requests a trial by jury of any issues so triable.
Beacon Navigation v. Honda Motor et. al.
e.digital v. Research in Motion Et. Al.
Innovative Display Technologies v. American Honda Motor Et. Al.
SmartPhone Technologies v. ZTE et. al.
CES Group v. Energy Labs et. al.
Data Locker v. Apricorn et. al.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.