Source: https://nj.gov/labor/wc/wnjpin/JudgeInfo.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 04:26:30+00:00

Document:
The Judicial Information System (JIS) is available only to Division of Workers' Compensation staff.
Information is continuously updated, so please check this site frequently.
Lebednikas v. Zalle Supermarkets, Inc.
Detres v. Workforce Logisitics Corp.
University Physicians Associates v. Transport Drivers, Inc.
Because the WC judge based her determination upon the usual fees and charges that prevail in New Jersey for similar physicians' and surgeons' services, the Appellate Division affirmed determination that payments made by Respondent’s Insurance Company at the seventy-fifth percentile was the industry standard in New Jersey for such services.
Ingenix, FAIR Health or Wasserman are evidence of the reasonableness of fees for the provider's geographic region or zip code. The use of national databases of fees is not limited to the above examples. When using a database as evidence of the reasonableness of a fee, the insurer shall identify the database used, the edition date, the geozip and the percentile.
Use of paid fees rather than billed fees as representing a more accurate measure of "reasonable and prevailing fees." Coalition for Quality Health Care v. New Jersey Department of Banking and Insurance, 358 N.J. Super. 123, 128 (App. Div. 2003).
Parking Lot Case akin to Livingstone v. Abraham & Straus, Inc., 111 N.J. 89 (1988).
Savio v. Matthew V. GIambri, Sr.
A compliation of decisions for judges (r. 1/3/2018). ** This is a large file, may take some time to open.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V.