Source: http://texas-opinions.com/law-contract-ambiguity.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 18:37:08+00:00

Document:
the contract. Westfield Ins. Co. v. Galatis, 100 Ohio St.3d 216, 797 N.E.2d 1256, 1261 (2003); Chrysler Ins.
796 (6th Cir. 2002) (applying Ohio law); Coker, 650 S.W.2d at 393; United Protective Servs., Inc. v. W. Vill.
46, 56 (Tex.App.-Dallas 2006, pet. denied).
contract is not ambiguous simply because the parties disagree over its meaning.” Id.
on law firm letterhead, signed by a lawyer on behalf of the firm, is with the firm, not with the lawyer personally.
reverse the judgment of the court of appeals.
ANGLO-DUTCH PETROLEUM INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. GREENBERG PEDEN, P.C.
10 Heritage Res., Inc. v. NationsBank, 939 S.W.2d 118, 121 (Tex. 1996).
13 Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. New Ulm Gas, Ltd., 940 S.W.2d 587, 589 (Tex. 1996).
14 Am. Mfrs. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schaefer, 124 S.W.3d 154, 157 (Tex. 2003).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.