Source: https://www.ensleinlaw.com/cases?newstype=679
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 10:30:31+00:00

Document:
One of the trilogy of summary judgment cases decided by the Supreme Court in 1986 and one of the most cited cases in modern legal history.
Remanded Court of Appeals case following Celotex Corp. v. Catrett.
Successfully represented the owner of several apartment buildings in which copper pipes were damaged by corrosive drinking water supplied by the D.C. Water and Sewer Authority ("WASA"), in the appeal of a grant of partial summary judgment in favor of WASA.
Debnam v. Crane Co., 976 A.2d 193 (D.C. 2009).
Easterling v. Am. Optical Corp., 207 W.Va. 123, 529 S.E.2d 588 (W.Va. 2000).
This case, a challenge of the grant of summary judgment in a D.C. Administrative Procedure Act ("APA") litigation, clarified which types of administrative proceedings are governed by the procedural requirements of a "contested case" under the APA.
McDaniel v. Armstrong World Indus., 603 F. Supp. 1337 (D.D.C. 1985).
Washington Hosp. Ctr. v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Emp’t Servs., 859 A.2d 1058 (DC 2004).
Weakley v. Burnham Corp., 871 A.2d 1167 (D.C. 2005).
Wesley Theological Seminary of the United Methodist Church v. United States Gypsum Co., 876 F.2d 119 (D.C. Cir. 1989).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.