Source: https://npo.tspu.edu.ru/en/archive.html?year=2018&issue=4&article_id=7057
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 07:11:30+00:00

Document:
Belyaeva E. O., Kataev S. G., da Silva T., Konstantinova E.
Implementing the competency-based approach in the education system in the current time is a step forward, it is an opportunity to see in a different way the structure of teaching and the target of the educational process. However, there is the problem of rejection of accepting the approach of competencies by the teaching community. In the opinion of the authors, among the many reasons that lead to inhibition of the introduction of the competence- based approach in real education structure, as more influence we can indicate the following: first, the lack of methods to determine the extent of competence training; second, the absence of a recognized methodology for interpreting the assessment of competence. In this work, we propose a model of the evaluation of a newly trained specialist of pedagogic courses, as the basis in the evaluation was used the quantitative methodology of competencies. The approach consists of several steps: establishing a set of competences, grouping competencies into blocks, quantitative assessment of the degree of competency formation, joint construction of “portraits”, analysis and interpretation of research results. The “indicator” method developed earlier by one of the authors has been applied to calculation of the level of formation of competences in the adapted look. The results of the approval of this model were made on the basis of the tests applied on Russian and Brazilian students.
1.	Sidorova Yu. V. Formirovaniye obshchikh i professional’nykh kompetentsiy studentov v uchrezhdenii srednego professional’nogo obrazovaniya [Formation of the general and professional competences of students of secondary vocational education institution]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2012, no. 6, pp.132–135 (in Russian).
2.	Stashkevich I. R., Serebrennikova E. A. Model’ formirovaniya kompetentsiy predprinimatel’skoy deyatel’nosti u studentov, obuchayushchikhsya po spetsial’nostyam tekhnicheskogo profilya [Model of formation of competences of business activity in students studying in specialties of a technical profile]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya, 2013, no. 3 (40), pp. 207–209 (in Russian).
3.	Andreyeva I. S. Modeli kompetentsiy v upravlenii personalom [Models of competences of human resource management]. Vestnik Chuvashskogo universiteta – Bulletin of the Chuvash University, 2014, no. 1, pp. 214–217 (in Russian).
4.	Nikolaeva I. S. Professional’naya kompetentsiya sotsial’nogo pedagoga [Professional competence of the social teacher]. Mir nauki, kul’tury, obrazovaniya, 2010, no. 4 (23), pp. 231–233 (in Russian).
5.	Filippov G. G. Kompetentna li teoriya kompetentsiy? [Whether the theory of competences is competent?]. Upravlencheskoye konsul’tirovaniye – Administrative Consulting, 2015, no. 10, pp. 157–164 (in Russian).
6.	Carvalho A. M. P. A pesquisa no ensino, sobre o ensino e sobre a reflexão dos professores sobre seus ensinos. Educaçãoe Pesquisa, 2002, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 57–67.
7.	A Training Module for Improving Knowledge Competencies for Resource Room Teachers in Jordan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 2009, vol. 10, no. 2. pp, 166–178.
8.	Polon T. L. P. Perfis de Liderança e seusreflexosnaGestão Escolar // 34a. ReuniãoAnual da Anped – Educa ção e Justiça Social. 2011, Natal/RN. Educa ção e Justiça Social. Anais 2011.
9.	Honorato H. G. O gestor escolar e suas competências: liderançaemdiscussão // III CongressoIbero Americano de Política e Administração da Educação. Zaragoza, Espanha. 14–17 novembro de 2012. URL: http://www.anpae.org.br/iberoamericano (acessoem 25 de Março de 2015).
10.	Akulova O. V., Zair-Bek E. S., Piskunova E. V., Radionova N. F., Tryapitsyna A. P. Kompetentnostnaya model’ sovremennogo pedagoga: uchebno-metodicheskoye posobiye [Competence-based model of the modern teacher: teaching aid]. Saint Petersurg, Herzen State Pedagogical University of Russia Publ., 2007. 158 p. in Russian).
11.	Sokolova I. I. Postroeniye modeli sistemy kachestva professional’nogo obrazovaniya: gumanitarno-razvivayushchiy podkhod [Creation of professional education quality system model: the humanitarian developing approach]. Chelovek i obrazovaniye – Man and Education, 2012, no. 3 (32), pp. 11–16 (in Russian).
12.	Ivanov D. A., Mitrofanov K. G., Sokolova O. V. Kompetentnostnyj podkhod v obrazovanii. Problemy, ponyatiya, instrumentariy: uchebno-metodichrskoye posobiye [Competence-based approach in education. Problems, concepts, tools: teaching aid]. Moscow, APK i PRO Publ., 2003. 101 p. (in Russian).
13.	Raven Dzh. Kompetentnostnyy podkhod v sovremennom obshсhestve [Competence-based approach in modern society]. Moscow, Kogito-tsentr Publ., 2002. 142 p. (in Russian).
14.	Korshunova O. V. Funktsional’no-kompetentnostnaya model’ podgotovki pedagoga v usloviyakh postindustrial’nogo obshestva. [Functional and competence-based model of teacher training in the conditions of post-industrial society]. Vestnik Vyatskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – Herald of Vyatka State University, 2009, no. 3, vol. 3. pp. 6–13 (in Russian).
15.	Efremicheva N. V. Funktsional’no-kompetentnostnaya model’ podgotovki pedagoga v usloviyakh postindustrial’nogo obshchestva [Competence-based model of training of teachers in the conditions of modernization of professional education]. Izvestiya GRPI im. Gertzena – Izvestia: Herzen University Journal of Humanities and Science, 2007, no. 37/1, vol. 11, pp. 30–36 (in Russian).
16.	Baydenko V. I. Vyyavleniye sostava kompetentsiy vypusknikov vuzov kak neobhodimyy etap proektirovaniya GOS VPO novogo pokoleniya: metodicheskoye posobiye [Identification of structure of competences of university graduates as necessary design stage of STATE VPO of new generation: teacher edition]. Moscow, 2006. 54 p. (in Russian).
17.	Kasprzhak A. Issledovaniya PISA kak osnovaniya dlya prinyatiya upravlencheskikh resheniy [Researches PISA as basis for adoption of administrative solutions]. Tendentsii razvitiya obrazovaniya: problemy upravleniya [Tendencies of development of education: problems of management]. Moscow, Universitetskay kniga Publ., 2005. Pp. 244–253 (In Russian).
18.	Sistema otsenki urovnya sformirovannosti kompetentsiy i rezul’tatov obucheniya. Pod red. V. I. Igoshina, S. N. Filipchenko, L. N. Ternova, Ya. G. Krylatova [System of an assessment of level of formation of competences and results of training: methodical recommendations. Under the editorship of Igoshin V. I., Filipchenko S. N., Ternov L. N., Krylatov Ya. G.]. Moscow, Saratov, Saint Petersburg, Pushkin, 2014. 33 p. (in Russian).
19.	Alekseeva E. O., Kataev S. G. Kompetentnostnaya model’ vypusknika fizicheskoy spetsial’nosti pedagogicheskogo vuza [Competence-based model of a pedagogical university graduate of physics speciality]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2014, no. 11(152), pp. 178–181 (in Russian).
20.	Kataev S. G., Kataev M. Yu. Matematicheskiy formalizm i algoritm strukturirovaniya mnogomernykh dannykh [Mathematical formalism and algorithm of structuring multidimensional data]. Polzunovsky vestnik, 2012, no. 2/1, pp. 99–103 (in Russian).
21.	Kataev S. G., Loboda Yu. O., Khomyakova E. A. Indikatornyy metod otsenivaniya kompetentsiy [Indicator method of estimation of competences]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2009, no. 11(89), pp. 70–73 (in Russian).

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.