Source: http://www.legalcrimesaz.com/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 05:04:47+00:00

Document:
rights and custody and control over CR and JS.
Court to justify CPS’s not reunifying CR with Smith and taking custody of JS.
to the Court to take custody of CR and JS away from Smith and Darrell.
United States District Court of Arizona.
thereby violating Plaintiff’s civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Plaintiffs of Smith Notice of Claim and Complaint regarding the taking of CR.
the Foster Parents by MacAlpine.
not be given to third parties and CR without her consent.
confidential mental health information protected by Federal HIPPA laws.
conspiracy to brainwash CR against her mother.
mentally ill and has damaged CR and Smiths relationship.
all rights, remedies, in law or in equity, available to them under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
humiliation and degradation because of Defendants’ Unconstitutional acts.
... Plaintiffs are entitled to recover their reasonable costs and attorney’s fees under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
... Plaintiffs are entitled to punitive damages.
COUNT TWO CIVIL RACKETEERING (A.R.S. §§13-2301, 2310, 2311 and 13-2314 – 18 U.S.C. § 1962) AND FRAUD 178.
Plaintiff incorporated herein all proceedings paragraphs of the Complaint.
... Defendants State of Arizona (through DES and CPS), Brown, MacAlpine, Pederson, Fink, Torres, Greco, Childhelp Children Center of Arizona, Buwalda, Buwalda Psychological Services PLLC, Foster Mother, Foster Father, Dr. Elton, Dr. Coffman, Brenda Bursch and UCLA (“Racketeering Defendants”) conspired together and agreed to work together to terminate Plaintiff’s parental rights in CR, including but not limited to bringing allegations of medical child abuse and to brainwash and manipulate CR into bringing allegations of physical or other abuse.
... The purpose was to manipulate her as much as possible to assure success by CPS in the Juvenile Court litigation and to terminate Plaintiffs parental rights in CR and JS. This was also done to limit or eliminate Plaintiffs claims against Defendants in this case for wrongfully taking CR and then JS from Plaintiffs custody and control.
... The Racketeering Defendants first prohibited Smith from bringing JS, Cordell and Darrell to supervised visits with CR and prohibited her from praying with and discussing religion with CR. These Defendants then exposed CR to movies, music, dress, makeup and profanity that they knew would not be approved by Smith but that would be enticing to a teenager. As a result of these efforts, CR became angry because she could not see JS, Darrell and Cordell at visits and mother was lying to her about religion. They influenced CR into believing Smith and Darrell were really Muslims and that Darrell had other wives.
... They also influence CR into believing that mothers litigation with the medical defendants would result in her not being able to become a nurse and that if she went home to her mother she would just do what her mother wanted and could not act independently of her. As a result of this manipulation, CR told Smith that she did not want to come home but wanted to continue to have a relationship with her mother.
... At this stage, where CR indicated she wanted to remain in foster care until 18 and she had become angry with her mother and felt her mother was lying to her, (all at the coaching of the Racketeering Defendants), particularly Greco in therapy and the Foster Mother and Father at home, had CR read the book “Sickened” and read Dr. Bursch’s Report regarding Smith. Upon finishing reading Sickened, CR related to the child in the book and believed that Smith drugged her to cause her comas. After reading the report, CR believes her mother is mentally ill, has MSBP and deprived her of her childhood.
... The Racketeering Defendants did not wait to litigate the MSBP issues before the Juvenile Court but did so in CR’s mind.
... The Racketeering Defendants then manipulated CR to bring allegations of physical abuse against Smith, who at the time had custody of JS, to get JS out of Smith’s home. Thereafter, they continued to manipulate CR to obtain allegations of physical abuse against Darrell and physical abuse and sexual abuse allegations against Smith.
... The Racketeering Defendants knew that CR had become “enmeshed” with Foster Mother and used this relationship to manipulate CR and to obtain false allegations of abuse.
... The above actions constitutes a scheme or artifice to defraud Plaintiffs of custody of CR and JS to damage or eliminate Plaintiffs claims against Defendants set forth in this litigation by manipulating CR into believing her mother tried to kill her, that she needed to protect JS and to make false allegations of abuse to assure termination of Plaintiffs parental rights in CR and JS.
... Upon information and belief, Plaintiffs parental interest in CR and JS constitutes a property interest that Defendants knowingly and intentionally schemed to deprive Plaintiffs of by manufacturing false allegations of physical and sexual abuse.
... The acts set forth in this complaint, constitute pattern of racketeering activity that took place from January of 2010 to the present. The manipulation of CR is ongoing and Defendants have further attempted to manipulate JS into believing her father wrongfully spanked her.
... Defendants presented and used the false allegations of abuse before the Juvenile Court to seek termination of Plaintiffs parental interest in CR and JS. The Juvenile Court denied the Petition for Termination and dismissed the Petition for Dependency. Plaintiff has been subject to multiple criminal investigations as each new allegation of abuse comes from CR. The Racketeering Defendants have aggressively sought criminal prosecution of Plaintiffs based on the allegations of abuse.
... This racketeering count, based on the facts set forth above, is brought pursuant to A.R.S. §13-2314 and 18 U.S.C. § 1962, with the predicate offenses of scheme or artifice to defraud pursuant to A.R.S. §§13-2310 -11 and 18 U.S.C. §1962(c), retaliation against a witness (Smith, Darrell, Cordell, CR and JS) pursuant to A.R.S. § 13-2802 and 18 U.S.C. §1513(e) and witness tampering (CR) pursuant to A.R.S. §2804 and 18 U.S.C. § 1513(b).
... As a result of the Racketeering Defendants acts, Smith was not reunified with CR, false allegations of abuse were presented to law enforcement and the Juvenile Court and Plaintiffs had to defend themselves to stop the termination of their parental rights in CR and JS. Further, Defendants have been seriously emotionally impacted by the allegations of abuse coming from CR as a result of the brainwashing, manipulation and coaching of the Racketeering Defendants.
... Plaintiff was forced to hire experts to defend themselves in the Juvenile Court and Plaintiffs have incurred expenses over $50,000.00. in retaining and having experts appear for trial before the Juvenile Court.
... Plaintiffs are entitled to treble damages.
... Plaintiff incorporated herein all proceedings paragraphs of the Complaint.
1962 (c) in violation of Title 18 USC 1962 (d).
activity as set forth throughout the instant complaint.
... Plaintiff incorporates herein all proceeding numbered paragraphs as though fully set forth herein.
... At all times relevant hereto, the Racketeering Defendants have collectively constituted an enterprise, as defined in 18 USC s 1961 (4) to wit, an association which enterprise has been engaged in and the activities of which affect interstate commerce. As such the defendants have witnessed tampered and retaliated against a witness and exploited them under 18 USC 1962(c).
her mother had in fact caused her medical condition(s).
issues in CR’s mind before those issues were addressed by the Juvenile Court.
provided counseling and therapy to Plaintiff.
This is NOT SEALED because it is a Notice Of Claim. If you think this is earth shattering you should see what THEY SEALED. These Crimes and the information they SEALED went to Arizona Superior Court, Arizona Federal Court and 9th Circuit Court Of Appeals and not one of these Conspirators/ Racketeers (RICO) were questioned or arrested. Yet I was Criminally Investigated 8 times with No Criminal Charges Filed.
Is this Aiding and Embedding?
Where is the Department Of Justice? All this evidence of Crimes and you tell me this is not Corruption. Where’s The Justice???
Read the 9th Circuit Brief by clicking the link below.

References: § 1983
 § 1983
 § 1983
 § 1962
 §13
 § 1962
 §1962
 § 13
 §1513
 §2804
 § 1513