Source: https://justice4willie.com/2017/07/08/willie-manning-death-row-mississippi-compromised-by-frank-parker-snitch-testimony/
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 23:56:44+00:00

Document:
At Willie’s trial Parker claimed that charges against him in Texas had been dropped, but this was not true: he was facing a sentence of two to ten years.[iv] Willie’s prosecutors knew or should have known this, but did not correct Parker’s claims.[v] When Parker eventually returned to Texas, and pled guilty to theft, he reaped the benefits of testifying against Willie: his trial judge accepted a plea bargain rewarding him for the testimony.[vi] Willie’s jury was unaware of this as a possible motivation for Parker.
The indications are that the state used Parker in order to obtain false testimony inculpating Willie. It is one of many irregularities in this case. Willie deserves a new trial.
[i] Willie Jerome Manning v. State of Mississippi, Motion for Leave to File Successive Petition for Post-Conviction Relief including DNA Testing and other Forensic Analysis. Supreme Court of Mississippi, filed March 22, 2013. Page 21. Print.
[ii] Willie Jerome Manning v. State of Mississippi, Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, Supreme Court of Mississippi, October 8, 2001. Page 33 (page 41 of pdf). Web. June 29, 2015.
[iii] Willie Jerome Manning v. State of Mississippi, Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, Supreme Court of Mississippi, October 8, 2001. Exhibit 21 (affidavit of Kristen Murray); Exhibit 22 (affidavit of Deena Kalai). Pages 179 – 184 of pdf. Web. June 29, 2015.
[iv] Willie Jerome Manning v. State of Mississippi, Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, Supreme Court of Mississippi, October 8, 2001. Exhibit 17. Pages 164 – 167 of pdf. Web. June 29, 2015.
[v] Willie Jerome Manning v. State of Mississippi, Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, Supreme Court of Mississippi, October 8, 2001. Pages 36 and 37 (pages 44 and 45 of pdf). Web. June 29, 2015.
[vi]Willie Jerome Manning v. State of Mississippi, Motion for Leave to File Successive Petition for Post-Conviction Relief including DNA Testing and other Forensic Analysis. Supreme Court of Mississippi, filed March 22, 2013. Pages 23 – 24. Print.
[vii]Willie Jerome Manning v. State of Mississippi, Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, Supreme Court of Mississippi, October 8, 2001. Page 36 (page 44 of pdf). Web. June 29, 2015.
[viii]Willie Jerome Manning v. State of Mississippi, Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, Supreme Court of Mississippi, October 8, 2001. Exhibit 11 (affidavit of Chester Blanchard). Pages 145 – 146 of pdf. Web. June 29, 2015.
This entry was posted in capital punishment, death penalty, Fly Manning, incentivized witnesses, jailhouse informant, jailhouse snitch, Mississippi, snitch testimony, USA, Willie Jerome Manning, Willie Manning and tagged capital punishment, death penalty, Fly Manning, Frank Parker, incentivized witness testimony, jailhouse informant, jailhouse snitches, July 2017, Mississippi, Oktibbeha County, police misconduct, prosecutorial misconduct, Radley Balko, Sheriff Dolph Bryan, snitch testimony, Starkville, Texas, USA, Willie Jerome Manning, Willie Manning. Bookmark the permalink.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.