Source: http://www.goreadabook.org/book/512194783/pele-defense-fund-v-puna-geothermal-venture
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 18:07:00+00:00

Document:
Puna Geothermal Venture (PGV) appeals the third circuit court's order denying PGV's motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction in an agency appeal brought by Pele Defense Fund (PDF) and other named parties*fn1 (collectively "Appellees"). PDF's appeal of the Department of Health's (DOH) decision to grant PGV's requested permits was brought pursuant to Hawaii Revised Statutes (HRS) § 91-14(a) (1985),*fn2 HRS § 603-21.8 (1985),*fn3 and Hawaii Rules of Civil Procedure (HRCP) 72.*fn4 We affirm.
Pele Defense Fund V. Puna Geothermal Venture book review Pele Defense Fund V. Puna Geothermal Venture ePUB; Hawaii Supreme Court; Law books.
Island Tobacco Co. V. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
Tate V. Gte Hawaiian Telephone Co.
Oppenheimer V. Aig Hawaii Insurance Co.
Caberto V. National Union Fire Insurance Co.
Wong-Leong V. Hawaiian Independent Refinery Inc.
Ross V. Stouffer Hotel Co.
Bateman Construction Inc. V. Haitsuka Brothers Ltd.
Wharton V. Hawaiian Electric Co.
Shimabuku V. Montgomery Elevator Co.
Maguire V. Hilton Hotels Corp.

References: § 91
 § 603
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.