Source: http://www.ijmp.jor.br/index.php/ijmp/article/view/639
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 04:44:22+00:00

Document:
The value of luxury is a multidimensional construct that assesses how consumers consider the various dimensions of luxury in their consumption relations. The consumption of luxury is not a trivial activity for most people, but brings a certain fascination and is part of the imaginary of the lower classes in emerging markets. The social identity of these consumers is changing because they aspire a new social position. But luxury consumption hurts the standards of this consumer profile. At the same time the self esteem is observed as an important element of people self-confirmation. For consumers, specifically, self-esteem is an important antecedent of consumption decisions. A sample of low income students was analyzed in this study to describe their relationship with luxury, and its influence on self-esteem when moderated by brand expressiveness. Through structural equation modeling this study found that the expression of the brand moderates the relationship of the value of luxury with self-esteem, allowing consumers of lower classes to observe a significant role of luxury in their lives.
Emerging markets; Luxury; Brand expressiveness; Consumer behavior.
BAGOZZI, R. P.; KYU-HYUN, L. (2002) Multiple routes for social influence: The role of compliance, internalization, and social identity. Social Psychology Quarterly, v. 65, n. 3, p. 226-247.
BELK, R. W. (1998) Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 2, n. 15, p. 139–168.
CARROLL, B.; AHUVIA, A. (2006) Some Antecedents and Outcomes of Brand Love. Marketing Letters, v. 17, n. 2, p. 79-89.
CAST, A. D.; BURKE, P. J. (2002) A Theory of Self-Esteem. Social Forces, v. 80, n. 3, p.1041-1068.
DAY, E. (1989) Share Of Heart: What Is It And How Can It Be Measured? The Journal of Consumer Marketing, v. 6, n. 1, p. 5-12.
DUBOIS, B.; DUQUESNE, P. (1993) The Market for Luxury Goods: income Versus Culture. European Journal of Marketing, v. 27, n. 1, p. 35–44.
EAGLY, A. H.; CHAIKEN, S. (1993) The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt.
ELLEMERS, N.; KORTEKAAS, P.; OUWERKERK, J. W. (1999) Self-categorisation, commitment to the group and group self-esteem as related but distinct aspects of social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, v. 29, p. 371-389.
ESTADÃO. (2012) Brasileiro substitui itens básicos por sofisticados. Available in http://www.estadao.com.br/blogs/jt-seu-bolso/2012/05/13/brasileiro-substitui-itens-basicos-por-sofisticados/, access in 12, June, 2015.
EUROMONITOR. (2014) Luxury goods Market Sizes Retail Value RSP | US$ mn |Fixed Exchange Rates, available in http://www.euromonitor.com, access at June,12 ,2015.
EXAME (2013) O novo salto do consumo se apóia na sofisticação. Available in http://exame.abril.com.br/revista-exame/edicoes/1055/noticias/o-novo-salto-do-consumo, access in june, 12, 2015.
GECAS, V. (1982) The Self-concept. Annual Review of Sociology, v. 8, p. 1-33.
HAIR JR, et al. (2014) A primer on partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM). SAGE Publications.
HAN, Y.; NUNES, J.; DRÈZE, X. (2010) Signaling Status with Luxury Goods: The Role of Brand Prominence. Journal Of Marketing. v. 74, n. 4, p. 15-30.
HENNIGS, N.; WIEDMANN, K.; KLARMANN, C.; STREHLAU, S.; GODEY, B.; Pederzoli; D.; OH, H. (2012) What is the Value of Luxury? A Cross-Cultural Consumer Perspective. Psychology & Marketing, v. 29, n. 12, p. 1018-1034.
KAPFERER, J. N. (2014 ) Lecture Monaco Symposium on Luxury.
KAPFERER, J. N. (2015) Kapferer on luxury: How Luxury brands can grow yet remain rare. Kogan Page. p. 17.
KEMP, S. (1998) Perceiving Luxury and Necessity. Journal of Economic Psychology, v. 9, n. 5, p. 591-606.
LEIBENSTEIN, H. (1950). Bandwagon. Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers' Demand. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, v. 64, n. 2, p. 183-207.
MALHOTRA, N. (2012) Pesquisa de Marketing: Uma orientação aplicada. Bookman: Porto Alegre, 6a Edição.
NGUYEN, B.; SIMKIN, L. (2013) The Dark Side of CRM: Advantaged and Disadvantaged. Journal of Consumer Marketing, v. 30, n. 1, p. 17-30.
ROSENBERG, M. (1981) The Self-Concept: Social Product and Social Force. In M. Rosenberg & R. H. Turner (Eds.), Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives, p. 593-624. New York: Basic.
SARAIVA, L. F. O.; REZENDE, J. C. O.; REIS, J. V. S.; INÁCIO, M. D.; SHUCMAN, L. V. (2015) A nova classe média: repercussões psicossociais em famílias brasileiras. Psicologia USP, v. 26, n. 1, p. 52-61.
SELLTIZ, C.; WRIGHTSMAN, L. S.; COOK, S. W. (1987) Métodos de pesquisa nas relações sociais. 2.ed. São Paulo: E.P.U.
SHIMP, T. A.; MADDEN, T. J. (1988) Consumer–Object Relations. Advances in Consumer Research, v. 15, n. 1, p. 163-168.
STREHLAU, S. (2008). Marketing do luxo. São Paulo: Cengage Learning, 155p.
VIGNERON, F.; JOHNSON, L. W. (1999) A review and a conceptual framework of prestige-seeking consumer behavior. Academy of Marketing Science Review, v. 1999, n. 1, p. 1–15.
WIEDMANN, K.-P.; HENNIGS, N.; SIEBELS, A. (2007) Measuring consumers’ luxury value perception: A cross-cultural framework. Academy of Marketing Science Review, v. 2007, n. 7, p. 1–21.
XIANCHI, D.; FISHBACH, A. (2014). How Nonconsumption Shapes Desire. Journal of Consumer Research, v. 41, n. 4, p. 936-952.
YE, S.-H.; LIU, X.-T.; SHI, S.-Y. (2015). The Research of Status’s Influence on Consumers’ Self-Brand Connection with Luxury Brands: Moderating Role of Self-Esteem and Vanity. Open Journal of Business and Management, v. 3, p. 11-19.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.