Source: https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-talmich
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 22:16:54+00:00

Document:
pleaded nolo contendere to Count(s) ____________ which was accepted by the Court.
The defendant is sentenced as provided in pages 2 through 10 of this judgment. The sentence is imposed pursuant to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.
[X] Count remaining of the Indictment  is [X] are dismissed on the motion of the United States.
The defendant is hereby committed to the custody of the United States Bureau of Prisons to be imprisoned for a total term of: one hundered and twenty (120) months.
The Court recommends the defendant be designated to a facility so he can participate in the Residential Drug Abuse I (RDAP).
 before 12 p.m. on ____________.
1. The defendant shall participate in and successfully complete a program of testing and/or treatment for substance abuse, as approved by the probation officer, until such time as the defendant is released from the program by the probation officer. The defendant shall abstain from the use of alcohol or other intoxicants during the course of treatment and shall pay the cost of treatment as directed by the probation officer.
 The determination of restitution is deferred until ____________. An Amended Judgment in a Criminal Case (AO 245C) will be entered after such determination.
Pursuant to Rule 32.2 of the Federal rules of Criminal Procedure, the defendant shall forfeit his interest in the following property to the United States: $490,064 in U.S. Currency.
B  The Court adopts the presentence investigation report with the following changes.
A  No Count of conviction carries a mandatory minimum sentence.
A  The sentence is within an advisory guideline range that is not greater than 24 months, and the Court finds no reason to depart.
 plea agreement that states that the government will not oppose a defense departure motion.
The Court grants the defendant's motion for a downward departure to criminal history category IV, pursuant to §4A1.3 because the government does not oppose said motion and the granting of same does not impact the outcome of sentencing.
1  For offenses for which restitution is otherwise mandatory under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, restitution is not ordered because the number of identifiable victims is so large as to make restitution impracticable under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(c)(3)(A).
2  For offenses for which restitution is otherwise mandatory under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A, restitution is not ordered because determining complex issues of fact and relating them to the cause or amount of the victims' losses would complicate or prolong the sentencing process to a degree that the need to provide restitution to any victim would be outweighed by the burden on the sentencing process under 18 U.S.C. § 3663A(c)(3)(B).
3  For other offenses for which restitution is authorized under 18 U.S.C. § 3663 and/or required by the sentencing guidelines, restitution is not ordered because the complication and prolongation of the sentencing process resulting from the fashioning of a restitution order outweigh the need to provide restitution to any victims under 18 U.S.C. § 3663(a)(1)(B)(ii).

References: §4
 § 3663
 § 3663
 § 3663
 § 3663
 § 3663
 § 3663