Source: http://courtfiles.org/TAMIKA-CARPENTER-vs-ARA-ERESIAN-2013-J-0274/59539f37d5d9ad2b48ca8cd0
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 10:49:05+00:00

Document:
07/02/2013 #1 Motion for enlargement of time to enter interlocutory appeal instanter, filed by Ara Eresian.
07/02/2013 #2 Petition pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, § 118 with attachments, filed by Ara Eresian.
07/03/2013 #3 RE#1: Denied. The single justice is without authority to enlarge the jurisdictional time limit prescribed by C.231, §118. (Carhart, J.). *Notice/Attest/Horan, J.
07/03/2013 RE#2: The petition is denied as untimely. (Carhart, J.). *Notice/Attest/Horan, J.
07/24/2013 Notice of appeal, filed by Ara Eresian.
07/31/2013 RE#3: The petitioner has filed a notice of appeal from the single justice's order denying the petition filed pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 118 (first par.). The notice of appeal is hereby struck because there is no such right of appeal. See McMenimen v. Passatempo, 452 Mass. 178 (2008); Gibbs Ford, Inc. v. United Truck Leasing Corp., 399 Mass. 8, n.8 (1987); Packaging Indus. Group, Inc. v. Cheney, 380 Mass. 609, 614 (1980). (Vuono, J.). *Notice.

References: § 118
 §118
 § 118
 v. 
 v. 
 v.