Source: https://fullskillsexamprep.com/spouses-iccrc-exam/
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 20:01:31+00:00

Document:
Welcome to your newest ICCRC Entry to Practice Exam Prep lesson on Spouse, Common-Law and Conjugal Partner Family Member Sponsorship.
Kumari v. Canada shows us a great example of the steps involved in sponsoring family members, especially the fact that if a sponsor does not meet the requirements of sponsorship, they have the option of cancelling the sponsorship application before it gets analyzed by the IRCC (since it will almost certainly be rejected if the sponsor is not eligible).
In the successful application for leave for judicial review of Saroya v. Canada, we can see some further details as to how a marriage is analyzed as genuine or not by IRCC officers. Some of the reasons for the initial rejection of this sponsorship are: the apparent haste of the wedding; a lack of compatibility between the Applicant and spouse in areas such as age, education and marital history, previous marriages, etc.
Can a married couple who do not live together or inform their families of their marriage be successful in proving the marriage is genuine? Burton v. Canada explores this issue and the circumstances surrounding the marriages in viewing the marriage as not-genuine.
Uddin v. Canada is a very complex spousal sponsorship case which shows the relationship between someone who is inadmissible and needs an ARC even though they are being sponsored as a spouse. It is demonstrated that the requirements for H & C relief in this instance is very high.
S.S.R. v. Canada is a great case to help you understand the importance of proving that a marriage was not entered into primarily for the purpose of acquiring immigration status.
Buchgeher v. Nova Scotia (Immigration): This is a great case to read in order to learn the fine details of the 5-year sponsorship bar.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.