Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/090219.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 20:17:20+00:00

Document:
GT SOLAR: Amended Consolidated "Braun" Complaint Pending in N.H.
SEQUATCHIE MOUNTAIN: Faces $13.5M Consumer Fraud Suit in Tenn.
Mediation in a purported class-action suit filed in the U.S.
Commission for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2008.
suit, "Saro Daghlian v. DeVry University, Inc., et al., Case No.
The Court also entered judgment in DeVry's favor on Mr.
Daghlian's individual claim under the California Education Code.
compelled speech in violation of the First Amendment.
UCL and False Advertising Law.
Court for the Central District of California, Judge Margaret M.
the quarter ended Dec. 27, 2008.
including certain investors in the company.
al. v. GT Solar International, Inc., et al."
counsel in the consolidated matter on Oct. 29, 2008.
amended consolidated complaint on or before Feb. 5, 2009.
relief as the Court should deem just and proper.
Court for the District of New Hampshire, Judge Joseph N.
53 State St, 13th Flr.
The putative securities class-action suit captioned, "Hamel v.
filed in New Hampshire State Court, under the caption, "Hamel v.
of the company's July 24, 2008 initial public offering.
Court for the District of New Hampshire on Oct. 22, 2008.
class actions on Nov. 25, 2008.
to remand the state class action to New Hampshire State Court.
sections of the Securities Act.
the company's products, including its DSS furnaces.
and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended Dec. 27, 2008.
GT Solar Holdings, LLC acquired the Company.
artificially inflated during the class period.
share value and additional losses to the plaintiff class.
between April 26, 2007, and Sept. 24, 2007.
Plan v. Harman International Industries, Incorporated, et al.,"
Harman International Industries Inc. Securities Litigation."
fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2008.
the plaintiff class (Class Action Reporter, June 19, 2008).
in further support of their motion to dismiss on Oct. 2, 2008.
The motion is now fully briefed, according to the company's Feb.
The suit is "In re Harman International Industries Inc.
Income Security Act, remains pending.
Action Reporter, June 19, 2008).
further support of their motion to dismiss on Oct. 20, 2008.
and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2008.
On Aug. 17, 2007, a lawsuit styled, "Vertie Staples v.
in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas.
are predicated date from 1989 to 2002.
air and water when they allegedly were not completely resistant.
and breach of express and implied warranties.
claims, and added a claim for unjust enrichment.
by the Court and the case is now styled, "Garry Clayton v.
amount in controversy exceeds $5.0 million.
The action is still in the class certification stage.
United Kingdom, Australia and South Africa.
agents, employees, parents, subsidiaries or affiliates.
between their reports and the time of trial.
but did not name them as defendants.
alleged market for the sale of caskets in the United States.
granted defendants' motion to transfer the action to the U.S.
defendants' motions to dismiss the amended FCA complaint.
and denies class certification, plaintiffs may petition the U.S.
periods between their reports and the time of trial.
until Jan. 10, 2009 as to potential claims against the company.
period ended Dec. 28, 2008.
Audio business from SigmaTel, Inc.
shares of the company for $21.22 per share in cash.
captioned "Hui Zhao v. International Rectifier Corp., No.
award of attorneys' fees and costs.
Property (IP) and Transition Services (TS).
International Rectifier Corp. has been referred by the U.S.
action lawsuits was filed against International Rectifier Corp.
behalf of a putative class of purchasers of IR stock from Oct.
27, 2005, through April 9, 2007.
revenue recognition errors at the company's Japan subsidiary.
tax benefits associated with the granting of stock options.
Plaintiffs filed an opposition to this motion.
Securities Litigation, No. CV 07-02544-JFW (VBKx) (C.D. Cal.),"
California, Judge John F. Walter, presiding.
terminated and earned vacation pay withheld.
needed help, or a real injustice was going to be done."
affected workers were from the Philippines.
Carter of Inman News reports.
(Class Action Reporter, Jan. 5, 2009).
obligations under the settlement agreement.
negligent, Susan Redden of the Joplin Globe reports.
conversion process (Class Action Reporter, Feb. 12, 2008).
fees (Class Action Reporter, July 27, 2007).
property and diminished their property values."
households in the area affected by the odor from RES.
to Jasper County at the request of Ms. Sundy's attorneys.
listed in the court records on the Internet.
the Huntington Herald Dispatch reports.
reports the Huntington Herald Dispatch.
in the development, Brett King of the Jasper Journal reports.
Others defendants in the case include Joe J. Detweiler, J.J.
John Barrack, according to the Jasper Journal.
Marion County Chancery Court on Jan. 28, 2009.
and for closing and they couldn't close."
County Health Department, and other regulatory agencies."
of lots, not in an approved development."
alleged back pay, according to The Kansas City Star report.
the lawsuit are asked whether they want to opt into the lawsuit.
And he certified the state law claims as a class-action.
Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc.," was filed in the U.S.
Wage Payment Act, K.S.A. Section 44-312.
changing area, work areas and break areas.
and post-judgment interest, attorneys' fees and costs.
(Class Action Reporter, Dec. 18, 2006).
of the Arkansas Democrat Gazette reports.
million present and former female associates.
Wal-Mart's Petition for Rehearing En Banc was denied as moot.
net sales during fiscal 2008.
2007 and October 27, 2008, inclusive (the "Class Period").

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v.