Source: https://www.lawweb.in/2017/03/whether-two-tier-arbitration-is.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 14:04:43+00:00

Document:
Law Web: Whether Two-Tier arbitration is permissible in India?
Whether Two-Tier arbitration is permissible in India?
C.A. Nos.2562 of 2006 etc.
September, 2001 by the arbitrator in London.
M/S. CENTROTRADE MINERALS & METAL INC.
Page 1 of 29Leave granted.
shall pay and bear their own costs.
judgment disposing of the appeals in terms of the signed judgment.
the Hon’ble the Chief Justice for constitution of a larger Bench.
result of this second arbitration will be binding on both the parties.
permissible under the laws of India?
what is the relief that Centrotrade is entitled to?
dragged on for about three months.
the nature of an appeal against the ‘arbitration result’ in India.
enforcing that ‘arbitration result’ should such enforcement become necessary.
Conciliation Act, 1996 (for short ‘the A&C Act’).
in Comparative International Commercial Arbitration.
(iv) may be challenged in the courts of the place of arbitration.
is a binding decision; and (iv) An award may be partial.
arbitration award given by the arbitral panel of the Indian Council of Arbitration.
learned counsel for Hindustan Copper Limited (hereafter referred to as ‘HCL’).
HCL the second part of Clause 14 of the contract is contrary to the laws of India.
otherwise contrary to public policy.
ramifications for international commercial contracts with an Indian party.
Contract Practices on the Work of its Third Session.
exclude such practice although it was not used in all countries.
the law in India through the A&C Act is quite different.
Arbitrators, (para 3-35) at p.276 and para 3-106 at p.290.
Amin Merchant v. Bipin M. Gandhi, 2005 (Suppl.) Arb. LR 337, Dhansukh K. Sethia v.
Ltd. v. Radheshyam B. Khandelwal, 2008 (1) Bom C.R. 768, ANS Pvt. Ltd. v. Jayesh R.
10 Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. Engineers Project Ltd., 2014 SCC Online Del 2314, U.P.
provisions of the Code were inapplicable.
unity and are to be regarded as one legal proceeding.
the career of the suit.
otherwise.” [Emphasis supplied by us].
sub-section (1) of Section 34 and then to Sections 35 and 36 of the A&C Act.
the same manner as if it were a decree of the court.
contention of learned counsel does not arise.
their mutual decision and accepting the validity of their agreement.
paragraphs (2) and (3) of this article.
major difficulty in harmonising international arbitration legislation.
within which) recourse against an arbitral award may be made.
commodity trades).” [Emphasis supplied by us].
cannot be an ‘appeal’ provision in the agreement between the contracting parties.
Page 19 of 29the view that an award is not a waste paper only because it has not been enforced.
effects partition of immovable property exceeding the value of Rs.100/-?
disputed.” [Emphasis supplied by us].
the Grain and Feed Trade Association, London was considered and upheld.
implicit acceptance of the general principle of two-tier arbitrations.
Page 23 of 29the subsequent decisions including the recent Reliance Industries Ltd. v.
Union of India28.” [Emphasis supplied by us].
comparatively low in the third category, high in second and higher in first.
that has to be generally resorted to.” [Emphasis supplied by us].
dispute. This choice is and should be binding on the arbitration tribunal.
32 Chapter 17 Determination of Applicable Law in Julian D. M. Lew, Loukas A.
clauses mutually agreed upon by the parties.
agreement between the parties does not fall under any of these situations.
question which relates to the enforcement of the appellate award.

References: v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.