Source: http://lawsdocbox.com/Legal_Issues/68645558-In-the-united-states-district-court-for-the-district-of-utah-central-division.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 15:49:45+00:00

Document:
Download "IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION"
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF UTAH CENTRAL DIVISION VOILÉ MANUFACTURING CORP., Plaintiff, ORDER and MEMORANDUM DECISION vs. LOUIS DANDURAND and BURNT MOUNTAIN DESIGNS, LLC, Case No. 2:07-CV-396 TC Defendants. BACKGROUND This motion for a preliminary injunction involves a dispute over U.S. Patent No. 6,877,759 (the 759 patent. ) The 759 patent covers a ski binding with certain structural elements. The 759 patent s specification generally describes a step-in binding for use in telemark skiing, a form of skiing where the heel of the ski boot is allowed to come off the ski. Some, but not all, of the claims in the 759 patent are expressly directed at step-in ski bindings. Step-in ski bindings allow a skier to simply place his or her boot in the binding to attach the boot to the binding. Such bindings are contrasted with cable ski bindings, which require the skier to bend over and use his or her hands to use a cable to attach the boot to the binding. Burnt Mount Designs, LLC ( Burnt Mountain ) holds the 759 patent and markets the Telebulldog and the lite dogz, step-in bindings based on the 759 patent. (It appears that at least the lite dogz is also available with a cable attachment.) Louis Dandurand is the president of Burnt Mountain and the original owner of the 759 patent.
THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT S DECISION IN EBAY V. MERCEXCHANGE: HOW IRREPARABLE THE INJURY TO PATENT INJUNCTIONS? RICHARD B. KLAR I.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA GAINESVILLE DIVISION 3D MEDICAL IMAGING SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. VISAGE IMAGING, INC., and PRO MEDICUS LIMITED, Defendants, v.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 01-1288 MARK R. HOOP and LISA J. HOOP, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. JEFFREY W. HOOP, STEPHEN E. HOOP, and HOOPSTERS ACCESSORIES, INC., Defendants-Appellees.
SUCCESSFULLY LITIGATING METHOD OF USE PATENTS IN THE U.S.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION MARY ELLE FASHIONS, INC., d/b/a MERIDIAN ELECTRIC, Plaintiffs, vs. Case No. 4:15 CV 855 RWS JASCO PRODUCTS CO., LLC, Defendant.
Case 1:15-cv GHW-SN Document 356 Filed 05/08/18 Page 1 of 10. Plaintiffs, Defendants.
Case:0-cv-00-PSG Document Filed0// Page of 0 ACER, INC., ACER AMERICA CORPORATION and GATEWAY, INC., Plaintiffs, v. TECHNOLOGY PROPERTIES LTD., PATRIOT SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION, ALLIACENSE LTD., Defendants.
United States District Court District of Massachusetts MEMORANDUM & ORDER. Plaintiffs Amax, Inc. ( Amax ) and Worktools, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit HOCKERSON-HALBERSTADT, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, CONVERSE INC., Defendant-Appellee.
Pharmaceutical Formulations: Ready For Patenting?
Portfolio Media. Inc. 111 West 19 th Street, 5th Floor New York, NY 10011 www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 Fax: +1 646 783 7161 customerservice@law360.com Pharmaceutical Formulations: Ready For Patenting?
Maurice E. Gauthier, William E. Hilton, Samuels, Gauthier & Stevens, Boston, MA, for Plaintiff.
United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. INNER-TITE CORPORATION, Plaintiff. v. DEWALCH TECHNOLOGIES, INC, Defendant. Civil Action No. 04-40219-FDS Aug. 31, 2007. Maurice E. Gauthier, William E.

References: V. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.