Source: https://www.lawweb.in/2017/03/whether-court-can-ignore-clear-words-or.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 06:51:02+00:00

Document:
Law Web: Whether court can ignore clear words or add something of its own or dilute meaning of clear word used in Will?
Whether court can ignore clear words or add something of its own or dilute meaning of clear word used in Will?
was granted in favour of the survivor.
primarily found out from the actual words used in the Will.
Suit(AS) No.851 of 1989 and Appeal Suit (AS)No.606 of 1989.
the Original Suit No.76 of 1981.
2. Civil Appeal No.5924 of 2005 has been filed by Dr. K.S.
Palanisami who was defendant No.13 in the Original Suit.
any one of them, survivor shall enjoy the entire property.
properties which were in the name of her deceased husband.
properties in favour of defendant Nos.4 and 5. Smt.
on the strength of Will dated 27.11.1980.
written statements in the suit.
Palaniappa Chettiar the Will became irrevocable.
of Palaniappa Chettiar were null and void.
the guidance of this Court.
the appellants in first three appeals are almost similar.
Separate arguments have also been advanced by Shri M.S.
erred in holding that there is no bar in filing the suit.
revoke the Will and execute a new Will.
Chettiar, Rangammal had no authority to revoke the Will.
charitable endowment made by the Will dated 27.9.1968.
to while considering the submissions in detail.
and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959 ?
of one of the testators?
interest to enjoy the rent and income?
violation of the Will and invalid ?
(6) Whether Will set up by defendant Nos.4 and 5 i.e.
by the trial court as well as by the High Court ?
shall cease to apply to Hindu Religious Institutions.
institution, as contemplated by 1959 Act.
them without alienating the same.
charities either jointly or individually.
for Hindus to use the same freely.
Thai Poosam in our name.
income derived from our properties.
The earlier Will executed in Doct.
trust created by the will.
characteristics of joint will and joint & mutual Will.
agreement for the survivor to be bound.
in favour of ascertainable beneficiaries.
agreement, a survivor is bound by it.
above case a husband and wife have executed a Will jointly.
novelty of the thing than its difficulty.
I am of opinion it is.
permit the other to break the contract?
Madras 406, had occasion to consider mutual & joint Wills.
Denyssen v. Mostert,(1872) LR, 4 PC, App.
put forward on behalf of the plaintiff.
arose whether the Will was a joint Will or a mutual Will?
properties, or of their joint property.
in Jarman on Wills, 8th Edition, page 41.
J. in Duddell in re; Roundway v.
to urge on the recitals of the documents.
Will disposed the properties to different relatives.
another Will, modifying the bequeath earlier made.
executed by a husband and wife with regard to a Bungalow.
became full owner of the entire bungalow.
was joint & mutual and husband had no right of alienation.
of the survivor of both the executants.
inherited by him or her death or not?
526, laid down following rules of construction of a Will.
the intention is to be collected.
observed in Venkata Narasimha Vs.
actually been employed.(Ram Gopal V.
case(supra) and Gnambal Ammal V. T.
of them as redundant or contradictory.
(Raj Bajrang Bahadur Singh V.
any such hiatus. (Pearey Lal V.
the will. (Ramachandra Shenoy V. Mrs.
clearly found in the Will.
read as limited right or life estate for the survivor.
description of the properties as mentioned in the document.
the will of the party first dying.
but has to be in accord with manner of disposition.
unexpected contingencies, if any necessity arises.
Will is not lost even if survivor is given absolute right.
Will after the death of Palaniappa Chettiar.
declared null and void as has been done by the High Court.
3 of the Will as noted above.
Court in so far as in declaring the alienation made by Smt.
defendant no. 4 & 5 as null and void are maintained.
and the Trust came into operation.
a sound and disposing state of mind ?
Sub­Registrar for proving the Will as DW.6.
20.2.1970, Schedule II, Item No.2 and 7 (Ex.B­114).
properties shall be treated as part of the Trust property.
116 are maintained subject to directions­I as made above.

References: v. 
 v.

 V.

 V. 
 V.

 V.

 V.