Source: http://lawlibrary.chanrobles.com/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=40350:a-c-no-5307-august-9,-2000-in-re-vicente-y-bayani&amp;catid=1396&amp;Itemid=566
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 03:44:29+00:00

Document:
IN RE: VICENTE Y. BAYANI.
It appears that Atty. Bayani has fallen short of the circumspection required of a member of the Bar. A counsel must always remember that his actions or omissions are binding on his clients. 8 A lawyer owes his client the exercise of utmost prudence and capability in that representation.
Davide, Jr., C.J., Melo, Puno, Vitug, Kapunan, Mendoza, Panganiban Quisumbing, Purisima, Buena, Gonzaga-Reyes, Ynares-Santiago and De Leon, Jr., JJ., concur.
Bellosillo, J., abroad on official business.
1.	Entitled, People of the Philippines v. Francisco Albior.
5.	In CBD Case No. 00-689, Rollo, pp. 8-10.
7.	Rule 18.03, Canon of Professional Responsibility; Villaluz v. Armenta, 285 SCRA 1 .
8.	Torres v. Orden, A.C. No. 4646, April 6, 2000, citing Gerard v. NLRC, 187 SCRA 701 ; Diaz-Duarte v. Ong, 298 SCRA 388 ; Kalubiran v. Court of Appeals, 300 SCRA 320 ; Velasquez v. Court of Appeals, 309 SCRA 539 .
9.	Torres v. Orden, supra, citing Vda. De Alisbo v. Jalandoon, Sr. 199 SCRA 321 .

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.