Source: http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50k/legal/a7/3404.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 00:15:21+00:00

Document:
Plaintiff, Church of Scientology International ("CSI") submits the following statement of undisputed materials facts, together with references to supporting evidence, in support of its motion for summary judgment on its remaining cause of action for breach of contract.
information he may have concerning the Church of Scientology, L. Ron Hubbard, or any of the organizations, individuals or entities listed in Paragraph 1 above . . . .
Plaintiff agrees that if the terms of this paragraph are breached by him, that CSI and the other Releasees would be entitled to liquidated damages in the amount of $50,000 for each such breach."
1. Exhibit A to Plaintiff's Complaint; Wilson Decl., ¶2, Exhibit A thereto; Wilson Decl., ¶3, Exhibit B thereto, Defendant's Answer, at ¶ 2:5-7; ¶ 14:17-22.
2. Several years later, plaintiff filed several breach of contract actions against defendant Armstrong which were consolidated in this Court in the case entitled Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case Nos. 152229 and 157680 ("Consolidated Action").
2. Wilson Decl., ¶¶4-5, Exhibits C and D thereto, Complaints filed in Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 152229 and Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 157680; Wilson Decl., ¶3, Exhibit B thereto at ¶¶ 2:5- 7; 2:28-3:1.
3. In the Consolidated Action, plaintiff CSI sought liquidated damages pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, as well as injunctive relief to prevent any future breaches of the Agreement by defendant Armstrong, including breaches of paragraph 7(D) of the Agreement.
3. Wilson Decl., ¶¶4-5, Exhibits C and D thereto, Complaints filed in Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 152229 and Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 157680; Wilson Decl., ¶3, Exhibit B thereto at ¶¶ 2:5-7; 2:28-3:1.
4. Armstrong, represented by counsel, cross-complained against plaintiff in the Consolidated Action challenging the validity of the Agreement on a number of grounds, including violation of the First Amendment, duress and abuse of process.
4. Wilson Decl., ¶6, Exhibit E thereto, Certified copy of Armstrong's Cross-Complaints in the cases entitled Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 152229 and Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 157680.
5. Wilson Decl. ¶7, Exhibit F thereto, Order of Permanent Injunction dated October 17, 1995, entered in Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 157680.
"1. Plaintiff and defendant freely and voluntarily entered into a Mutual Release of All Claims and Settlement Agreement in December, 1986.
4. Since 1990, defendant Armstrong has repeatedly breached paragraphs 7(D).
"Facilitating in any manner the creation, publication, broadcast, writing, filming audio recording, video recording, electronic recording or reproduction of any kind of any book, article, film, television program, radio program, treatment, declaration, screenplay or other literary, artistic or documentary work of any kind which discusses, refers to or mentions Scientology, the Church and/or any of the Beneficiaries (which includes plaintiff herein, CSI); 5. Discussing with anyone, not a member of Armstrong's immediate family or his attorney, Scientology, the Church, and/or any of the Beneficiaries (including CSI.)."
6. On May 2, 1996, the Order of Permanent Injunction was incorporated into a judgment against defendant Armstrong.
6. Wilson Decl., ¶8 and Exhibit G thereto, May 2, 1996 Order of Permanent Injunction issued in the Consolidated Actions of Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 152229 and Church of Scientology International v. Armstrong, Case No. 157680; Answer of Gerry Armstrong Answer, ¶ 2:5-7.
in the Consolidated Action for an Order to Show Cause why defendant Armstrong should not be held in contempt for violating the October 17, 1995 Order of Permanent Injunction for engaging in 131 breaches of the October 17, 1995 Injunction.
Re: Contempt and supporting documents thereto.
8. These 131 postings are written publications in which he discusses his and others' experiences in the Church of Scientology and he makes mention of and discusses information he has concerning the Church of Scientology.
8. Wilson Decl., ¶2 and Exhibit A thereto, the Mutual Release of All Claims and Settlement Agreement; Wilson Decl., ¶3, Exhibit B thereto, Defendant's Answer, ¶15:4-5, ¶ 16:8-17, ¶¶ 27-30:2, ¶ 35:21-24, ¶ 48:12, 22-26.
9. Defendant Armstrong was given an opportunity and did file an opposition to the Ex Parte Application, asserting the same arguments he proffered earlier in the Consolidated Action.
9. Wilson Decl.,¶10 and Exhibit I thereto, Armstrong's Opposition to Order to Show Cause.
10. Wilson Decl., ¶11 and Exhibit J thereto, Order of Contempt issued in the Consolidated Action dated July 13, 2001.
more provisions of the Injunction ... ARMSTRONG did not deny these violations. In his January 9, 2001 declaration under penalty of perjury, ARMSTRONG stated, "I have violated Scientology's Injunction thousands of times since former Marin County Superior. Court Judge [Gary Thomas] signed it in October, 1995."
11. ARMSTRONG has admitted committing the 201 breaches of contract alleged in the First Cause of Action.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.