Source: https://www.mayerbrown.com/en/people/p/pluta-robert-g
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 08:34:11+00:00

Document:
Robert Pluta is a partner in Mayer Brown’s Chicago office and is a member of the Intellectual Property practice. Rob is a trial lawyer with 15 years of experience devoted to intellectual property litigation and appeals, with specific emphasis on patent disputes, including US District Court litigation, International Trade Commission (ITC) litigation, contentious inter partes review (IPR) proceedings before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, and Federal Circuit appeals. Rob also drafts and negotiates technology license agreements. He is experienced in a vast array of technologies, including mobile devices, semiconductors, LCD panels, telecommunications, medical devices, and pharmaceuticals.
Rob has been lead counsel in over 75 IPR proceedings. In 2017, Law360 named Rob a “Rising Star” in Technology Law.
In addition to his intellectual property litigation experience, Rob has experience litigating breach of contract, antitrust, and class action cases.
Prior to joining Mayer Brown, Rob served as senior intellectual property counsel at Motorola Mobility LLC, where he directed litigation strategy for several high-profile cases in district courts and the ITC. He also collaborated with engineers and business partners to ensure freedom of operation, and negotiated and drafted license and settlement agreements.
ATI Technologies ULC v. LG Electronics, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2016) – Representing LG Electronics.
McKesson Technologies, Inc. v. Epic Sys. Corp, (Fed. Cir. 2011) – Represented Aristocrat Technologies as amicus curiae in en banc proceedings of the Federal Circuit.
Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc. (Fed. Cir.2011) - Represented Aristocrat Technologies as amicus curiae in en banc proceedings of the Federal Circuit..
Aristocrat Technologies v. IGT (Fed. Cir. 2010) - Represented appellant Aristocrat.
Genzyme Corp. v. Sandoz Inc. (D. Del. 2012) - Represented Sandoz in Hatch–Waxman litigation involving the drug Hectorol® (doxercalciferol).
Sepracor Inc. v. Sandoz Inc. (E.D.N.C. 2012) - Represented Sandoz in Hatch-Waxman litigation involving the drug XyZal® (levocetirizine hydrochloride).
Encore Rail Systems v. The Willamette Valley Co. (N.D. Ill. 2011) - Represented The Willamette Valley Co.
Nitro Distributing, et al. v. Alticor (W.D. Mo. 2003-2009), aff'd, 565 F.3d 417 (8th Cir. 2009). Represented Alticor and Amway.
Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. (D. Md. 2001-2009). Represented R.J. Reynolds.
Barton v. Intermatic (D. Mass. 2007-2008). Represented Intermatic Inc.
Energy Trans. Group v. Phonak et al. (D. Del. 2004). Represented Phonak.
LG Electronics, Inc. v. Mondis Technology Ltd., Case 90/13,481 – representing LG Electronics, Inc.
LG Electronics, Inc. v. Mondis Technology Ltd., Case 90/13,480 – representing LG Electronics, Inc.
LG Electronics, Inc. v. Mondis Technology Ltd., Case 90/13,479 – representing LG Electronics, Inc.
LG Electronics, Inc. v. Mondis Technology Ltd., Case 90/13,478 – representing LG Electronics, Inc.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.