Source: https://www.heritage.org/the-constitution/event/scholars-scribes-review-the-rulings-the-supreme-courts-2017-2018-term?mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWm1FM01UWXhOV0UxWlRBdyIsInQiOiJpMjAzYkJhMDA2ZVM0dGZLbnR0eW5ob0hvcEZiZ3BnWDQxR1wveFYyZjBUTldGXC80b2xBdkl2emdJQnI0N2dUWXpcL3h5ZGlwXC9HakJjclZ4RFozRjZBUXc9PSJ9
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 03:04:10+00:00

Document:
The Supreme Court’s 2017-2018 term will soon be over, but the need for serious analysis has just begun. Did the High Court get the big cases right?
The Supreme Court’s 2017-2018 term will soon be over, but the need for serious analysis has just begun. Did the High Court get the big cases right? What will the Court’s ruling in Trump v. Hawaii mean for immigration and executive power? Is the future for religious freedom secure in the wake of Masterpiece Cakeshop Ltd. V. Colorado Civil Rights Commission? How will Gill v. Whitford and Benisek v. Lamone, the partisan gerrymandering cases, impact the upcoming mid-term elections? Will Janus v. AFSCME sound the death knell for public employee unions across the country? How will the Court’s arbitration agreements in Epic Systems affect employers and employees? What response, if any, is necessary from Congress following South Dakota v. Wayfair, the internet sales tax case? Did any broader themes of the Roberts Court emerge this term, and has Justice Gorsuch changed the balance of the Court?
Please join us as our distinguished panels of practitioners and correspondents debate these and more from the 2017-2018 term.

References: v. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.