Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Judgment-liens-Part-2.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 08:06:25+00:00

Document:
48. Grant v. Bennett, 96 III. 513; Davidson v. Myers, 24 Md. 538; Eastham v. Sallis, 60 Tex.
576; 2 Freeman, Judgments, Sec. 341.
49. Noe v. Moutray, 170 III. 169 177, 48 N. E. 709; Eastham v. Sallis, 60 Tex. 576; Linn v. Patton, 10 W. Va. 187.
50. Gilman v. Hovey, 26 Mo. 280; White v. Bogart, 73 N. Y. 256; Lauffer v. Cavett, 87 Pa. St. 479.
51. Sellers v. Burk, 47 Pa. St. 344.
White v Espey, 21 Ore. 328, 28 Pac. 71.
53. Act Aug. 1, 1888 (25 Stat. 357). See Cooke v. Avery, 147 U. S. 375, 37 L. Ed. 209.
54. Eames v. Germania Turn Verein, 74 III. 54; Raymond v. Blancgrass, 36 Mont. 449, 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 976, 93 Pac. 648; Conard v. Everich, 50 Ohio St. 476, 40 Am. St. Rep. 679, 35 N. E. 58; Hohman's Appeal, 127 Pa. St. 209, 17 Atl. 902; Battle v. Bering, 7 Yerg. (Tenn.) 529, 27 Am. Dec. 526; Linn v. Patton, 10 W. Va. 187. In Blake v. Heyward, 1 Bailey, Eq. (S. C.) 208, it was held that the same result follow ed from a statute authorizing an execution to issue under an equity decree.
55. As to docketing, see Berry v. Reed, 73 Ind. 235; Josselyn v.
Stone, 28 Miss. 753; McMillan v. Davenport, 44 Mont. 23, 118 Pac. 756; Roll v. Rea, 57 N. J. L. 647, 32 Atl. 214; Hulbert v. Hulbert, 216 N. Y. 430, 111 N. E. 70; Sa-bin v. Kyniston, 81 Ore. 358, 159 Pac. 69; Wood v. Reynolds, 7 Watts. & S. (Pa.) 406; Reid v. McGowan, 28 S. C. 74, 5 S. E. 215; Flanagan v. Oberthier, 50 Tex. 379; Gurnee v. Johnson, 77 Va. 712; Duncan v. Custard, 24 W. Va. 730; Bush v. Faris, 30 U. S. App. 626, 71 Fed. 770, 18 C. C. A. 315. As to indexing, see Metz v. State Bank of Brownville, 7 Neb. 165; Ætna Life Ins. Co. v. Hesser, 77 Iowa, 381, 4 L. R. A. 122, 14 Am. St. Rep. 297, 42 N. W. 325; Hughes v. Lacock, 63 Miss. 112; Dewey v. Sugg, 109 N. C. 329, 14 L. R. A. 393, 13 S. E. 923; Crouse v. Murphy, 140 Pa. St. 335, 12 L.
- Lands and interests therein subject to the lien.
R. A. 58, 23 Am. St. Rep. 232, 21 Atl. 358; Gullett Gin Co. v. Oliver, 78 Tex. 182, 14 S. W. 451.
56. Cushing v. Edwards, 68 Iowa, 145, 25 N. W. 940; York Bank's Appeal, 36 Pa. St. 458; Craig v. Sebrell, 9 Gratt. (Va.) 131. Contra, Glasscock v. Stringer (Tex. Civ. App.), 32 S. W. 920.
57. Sapp v. Wightman, 103 III. 150; Baker v. Chandler, 51 Ind. 85; Kerngood v. Davis, 21 S. C. 183; Black, Judgments, Sec.Sec. 417, 418.
& L. E. Ry. Co., 53 Ohio St. 151, 29 L. R. A 438, 41 N. E. 247; Firebaugh v. Ward, 51 Tex. 409.
59. Verdin v. Slocum, 71 N. Y. 345; Anderson v. Tydings, 8 Md. 427, 63 Am. Dec. 708; Lancaster County Bank v. Stauffer, 10 Pa. St. 398; Bridge v. Ward, 35 Wis. 687.
English statute before referred to, and is not, at the present day, regarded as so subject, in the absence of a statutory provision to the contrary.60a In some states, however, a statute imposing the lien on the "real estate" or "real property" of the debtor is considered to include equitable as well as legal interests, and express provisions to the same effect are quite usual.61 The judgment creditor, moreover, apart from statute, may, after return of execution unsatisfied, file a bill to obtain satisfaction of the judgment out of an equitable interest, and, upon so doing, the judgment becomes effective thereon as against any incumbrances or conveyances subsequent to the date of such filing.62 Under statutes subjecting equitable interests to the lien, mortgaged land belonging to the judgment debtor, the "equity of redemption," is subjected to the lien, even where the legal view of a mortgage is adopted, and, in states where the mortgagee has merely a lien without the legal title, the mortgagor's interest in the land is so subject as a legal estate.63 all terms which have more than a certain number of years to run.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.