Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/321205291/United-States-v-Kyle-Joseph-Momon-A-K-A-Moo-Moo-A-K-A-Cow-A-K-A-Flavor-Flave-A-K-A-Calvin-Flavor-United-States-of-America-v-Rodney-Roberto-Wall
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 10:27:20+00:00

Document:
Flave, a/k/a Calvin Flavor, Defendant-Appellant.
Rodney Roberto WALLACE, a/k/a Touch, DefendantAppellant.
James S. Perry, Perry, Perry, Perry & Grigg, Kinston, NC; James M.
Cole, U.S. Atty., Jane H. Jolly, Asst. U.S. Atty., Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
Bell also appeal their sentences. We affirm.
Vincent first came to Kinston in the early summer of 1989 and stayed a week.
and fall of 1989, and also collected money with Vincent Romain.
Wallace before the Romains were arrested.
F.2d 281, 293 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 869 (1989).
in restraints is so inherently prejudicial that the right to a fair trial is denied.
United States v. Moreno, 933 F.2d 362, 368 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S.
incident has rendered any jurors incapable of deciding the case on the evidence.
favorable to the government. Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S. 60, 80 (1942).
In this case, the trial evidence easily supports the jury's verdict.
Appellants' failure to object during trial. This Court has held, in United States v.
district court's comments are so prejudicial that they deny a party a fair trial.
argue only that the frequency of the district court's questions prejudiced them.
that the district court's questions were asked in a neutral and impartial manner.
eventually returned the package to Momon.
testimony under the Jencks Act.
the government was obligated to disclose under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S.
probability that its disclosure would have resulted in a different outcome.
entitled to a new trial on this ground.
drug distribution. United States v. Onick, 889 F.2d 1425, 1431 (5th Cir.1989).
drug activity took place only after he and Kim moved out of the house.
drug distributions carried out from the house.
a criminal history category of VI, and a guideline range of 360 months to life.
United States v. Olano, 61 U.S.L.W. 4421 (U.S.1993).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.