Source: https://vi.scribd.com/document/398162855/Rembrandt-Wireless-Technologies-vs-Apple-Inc
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 22:23:41+00:00

Document:
Cellular Communications Equipment v. LG Electronics et. al.
Cequent Performance Products v. Hopkins Manufacturing Et. Al.
Norred v. Medtronic et. al.
MTE v. Mirus International et. al.
Better Mouse Company v. Roccat Et. Al.
EBS Automotive Services v. RTI Technologies et. al.
at 401 City Ave., Suite 900, Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania 19004.
Corporation System (C0168406), 818 West Seventh Street, Suite 930, Los Angeles, CA 90017.
committed patent infringement in the State of Texas.
patents-in-suit occurs in this District, and in Texas.
and/or use Defendant’s infringing products in this District.
judicial economy further support venue in this Judicial District.
infringement. A true and correct copy of the ‘228 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
line 7, with reference to Fig. 2. Briefly, Fig. 2 discloses a polled multipoint master/slave system.
polled by the master, it could respond to the master in a similar fashion (sequences 42-46 in Fig.
exemplary tributary transceivers. Figure 8 shows a signal diagram for exemplary transmissions.
state 128 to receive data from master transceiver 64 as part of sequence 132.” [Col. 7, ll.
communication systems that implement different types of modulation methods.
22. The ‘228 Patent describes systems and methods that solved technical problems.
included backwards compatibility with older devices using different types of modulation.
that would render them unpatentable. For example, one is free to practice the prior art of record.
human ingenuity or technological work.
the context of wireless communication devices.
indirectly infringes claim 21 of the ‘228 Patent by active inducement under 35 U.S.C. § 271(b).
vendor, Broadcom Inc., which also supplied Bluetooth products to Samsung.
licensed products with the ‘228 Patent number, which occurred on August 27, 2018.
manner and constitute willful infringement of the ‘228 Patent.
for past infringement. A true and correct copy of the ‘580 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit B.
incorporates them by reference herein.
those terms are defined above for the ‘228 Patent).
indicate the modulation method of a “second sequence” comprising a packet payload.
the case of a Basic Rate packet) or a DPSK payload (in the case of an Enhanced Rate packet).
supplied Bluetooth products to Samsung.
products with the ‘580 Patent number, which occurred on August 27, 2018.
manner and constitute willful infringement of the ‘580 Patent.
43. Rembrandt hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues.
a) A declaration that Apple has infringed and is infringing U.S. Patent Nos.
c) An award of damages to Rembrandt arising out of Apple’s infringement of U.S.
HEIM, PAYNE & CHORUSH, L.L.P.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 271