Source: http://www.childrenslegalrightsjournal.com/childrenslegalrightsjournal/fall_2013?pg=31
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 22:57:31+00:00

Document:
120 As the Court struggles with the issue of abortion, they have found that states have an interest in the unborn child at the point of being viable. The state argues it has an interest over the privacy rights of the mother to regulate in a limited manner the issue of abortion on behalf of the fetus. See Webster v. Reprod. Health Servs., 492 U.S. 490, 520 (1989).
121 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113 (1973).
122 Bellotti, 443 U.S. at 640-41.
123 Pavlides v. Niles Gun Show, Inc., 637 N.E.2d 404, 409 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994) (stating minors are prohibited from purchasing guns or ammunition); see Berg v. Traylor, 56 Cal. Rptr. 3d 140, 146-47 (Ct. App. 2007) (placing a limitation on minors signing contracts); see also Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525, 588-89 (2001) (Thomas, J., concurring) (stating that every state prohibits the sale of alcohol to those under age twenty-one).
124 R.W.D. v. Walker Cnty. Dep’t of Human Res., 808 So. 2d 46, 48 (Ala. Civ. App. 2001) (removing a child that tested positive for cocaine at birth from the care of the parents); see also In re C.L.G., 956 A.2d 999, 1005 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2008) (involuntarily terminating the parental rights of a mother who was incarcerated). 125 Bellotti, 443 U.S. at 635.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.