Source: http://www.clsadb.com/document/ee67f6c1-51a2-4c52-b5b5-8fcf94d9a363
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 22:24:44+00:00

Document:
Congregation for the Evangelization of Peoples, Instruction on the sending abroad and sojourn of diocesan priests from missionary territories La missione universal, 21 April 2001.
2. As a consequence, this particular form of missionary cooperation between the Churches, that is, of fidei donum priests, which has been in place since the middle of last century, remains valid even today. It is particularly so in the case of the established Churches whose focus is on those specific Churches not only in Africa but also in other continents – such as Asia, Latin America and Oceania - where evangelisation was needed and is still required today with new enthusiasm and zeal due to the low living standards and limited personnel.
3. This exchange among the Churches, the fruit of universal communion, must preserve a strong missionary thrust to counteract the prevalent trend of a certain number of diocesan priests who, incardinated in their particular Churches in mission territories, want to leave their own country and reside in Europe or North America, often with the intention of further studies or for other reasons that are not actually missionary.
Often their motives are based on the higher living conditions which these countries offer and the need for young priests in some of the established Churches. These priests are then convinced by such reasoning not to return to their own country, sometimes with the tacit permission of their own Bishop, or at other times in opposition to his request that they return home. A certain permanency is then given to such irregular situations by virtue of the vast distances and poor communication.
5. First of all, this Instruction is intended for diocesan Bishops or their equivalent in law7 whose ecclesiastical circumscriptions are dependent on the Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples. Thus, they must adhere to the enclosed norms, applying them immediately so as to resolve any irregular situations.
This Instruction is also being sent, in agreement with the Congregation for Bishops, to the Episcopal Conferences of Western Europe, North America and Australia, to inform them of the existence of this phenomenon and to ensure that adequate provisions are made so that a proper exchange based on a true missionary spirit may be re-established between the Churches. Furthermore, this Instruction also pertains to other countries, not cited above, where this same problem occurs.
In the mission territories one needs to be particularly attentive during the seminarian's formation not to allow an attitude that clamours for the supposed right to pursue further studies after ordination nor that the bishop has the obligation to send him abroad.
7. Reasons for staying abroad. One of the principal reasons why diocesan priests from missionary territories are sent abroad by their Ordinary is to further their studies in a field that is unavailable in their own region, with the aim of providing a specific ecclesial service upon their return.
So every Bishop, together with his collaborators, should make a careful selection from among his priests of those who are truly gifted and capable of further studies. This decision should be based on the needs of the Diocese, such as teaching roles at the major and minor seminaries, the permanent formation of clergy, curial officials and particular departments of the diocesan chancery, or even at a provincial or national level – in which case it would be in agreement with the Episcopal Conference.
One is strongly advised not to send abroad for further studies those priests who have personal problems, in the vain hope that they may find a remedy – instead they should be helped in more appropriate and specific ways.
8. Pastoral assistance to emigrants of one's own country is another reason why a diocesan priest may be sent abroad for a certain period.
9. One final reason, that one may encounter in exceptional cases, concerns those situations where priests are forced to leave their own country for reasons of persecution, war or other serious motives. Even if such situations cannot be foreseen, as often happens, it is still necessary to clarify the situation and the concerns of each case while bearing in mind the legal requirements of individual nations that accept refugees.
First of all, as a general rule, what is sanctioned by C.I.C., can. 283 §1 is reiterated: "Clerics, even if they do not have a residential office, are not to be absent from their Diocese for a considerable time, to be determined by particular law, without at least the presumed permission of their Ordinary."
The Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples requires that all Bishops and diocesan Priests strictly observe the above canon, in addition to those situations indicated in article 3 of this Instruction.
Art. 1 – The diocesan Bishop of Mission Countries, after having ascertained the actual diocesan needs and sought the counsel of his collaborators, should choose the most able priest, after having asked his consent, to pursue further studies. He is to designate the field of study in which the priest must specialize, the Faculty in which he must enrol and the date of his definitive return.
Art. 2 – Agreement is then sought in writing with the diocesan Bishop and with the proposed Institute where he has decided to send the priest, including the question of his financial support.
Art. 4 – The diocesan Bishop who receives a priest student from mission territories into his own Diocese should make sure that a precise agreement has been reached, as specified above, with the Bishop who is sending the priest for further studies.
Art. 5 – The Bishop who is accepting priest students into his Diocese is obliged to provide spiritual assistance for them by inserting them into the diocesan pastoral plan, ensuring that they participate in the life of the Presbyterate and accompanying them with fatherly care.
Art. 7 – Any priest who, after having been warned as prescribed by law,15 obstinately refuses, to abide by his Bishop's decision and return to his Diocese, will be punished with an appropriate penalty as decreed by law.16 Before proceeding, however, the Ordinary ought to inform the overseas Bishop of his intention.
Art. 8 – Apart from the norms already noted, either of universal or particular law, and before appointing a priest of a mission territory as a chaplain to migrants, the two Bishops involved should come to some understanding, confirmed in a written agreement, concerning the type and duration of pastoral work required. Such a priest should be introduced into the pastoral activities of the Diocese and participate in the life of the Presbyterate.
Art. 9 – In the event of numerous emigrant groups, some agreement can also be made with the respective Episcopal Conferences.
Art. 10 – Any Bishop who welcomes a refugee priest from a mission territory into his Diocese, that is, someone who has had to leave his home for grave reasons, must consult with the Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples prior to giving him a pastoral office.
The Supreme Pontiff John Paul II, during the course of the Audience granted to the undersigned Cardinal on the 24 April 2001, approved the present Instruction and ordered its publication.
Rome, from the Office of the Congregation for the Evangelisation of Peoples, 25 April 2001, Feast of Saint Mark, the Evangelist.
1 Cf. SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL, Decree on the Priesthood Presbyterorum Ordinis, no. 10: AAS 58 (1966) 1007; JOHN PAUL II, Encyclical letter Redemptoris Missio, 7 December 1990, nos. 67-68: AAS 83 (1991) 315-326.
2 SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL, Decree on Missionary Activity Ad Gentes, no. 39: AAS 58 (1966) 986-987.
3 Cf. Redemptoris Missio, no. 33: AAS 83 (1991) 278-279.
4 Redemptoris Missio, no. 68; cf. CONGREGATION FOR CLERGY, Directive Postquam apostolic, 23 July 1980, nos. 23-31: AAS 72 (1980) 360-363; JOHN PAUL II, Post-Synodal Apostolic Exhortation Pastores dabo vobis, 15 March 1992, no. 18: AAS 84 (1992) 684-686.
5 Cf. CONGREGATION FOR THE EVANGELISATION OF PEOPLES, Instruction Cooperatio missionalis, 1 October 1998, nos. 16-17.
6 Cf. Instruction Cooperatio missionalis, no. 20.
7 Cf. C.I.C., can. 381 §2.
8 Pastores dabo vobis, no. 58: AAS 84 (1992) 759-761.
9 Pastores dabo vobis, no. 72: AAS 84 (1992) 783-787.
10 SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL, Decree on the training of priests Optatam totius, no. 18: AAS 58 (1966) 725.
11 In this regard one can note the directives issued by the Italian, German and U.S.A. Episcopal Conferences.
12 SECOND VATICAN COUNCIL, Decree on Bishops Christus Dominus, no. 18: AAS 58 (1966) 682; PAUL VI, Motu proprio Pastoralis migratorum cura, 15 August 1969: AAS 61 (1969) 601-603; COMMISSION FOR THE PASTORAL ASSISTANCE OF MIGRANTS AND TOURISM, Letter Nella sua sollecitudine, 26 May 1978: AAS 70 (1978) 357-378; C.I.C., can. 568; CONGREGATION FOR CATHOLIC EDUCATION AND THE PONTIFICAL COMMISSION FOR PASTORAL ASSISTANCE OF MIGRANTS AND TOURISTS, Letter on Human Mobility and the formation of future priests, 25 January 1986.
13 As, for example, the position of parish priest, according to C.I.C., can. 522.
14 Cf. C.I.C., can. 271 §3.
15 Cf. C.I.C., can. 1347 §1.
16 Cf. C.I.C., can. 273 and can. 1371 §2.

References: §1

Art. 1

Art. 2

Art. 4

Art. 5

Art. 7

Art. 8

Art. 9

Art. 10
 §2
 §3
 §1
 §2