Source: https://chestofbooks.com/business/law/Handbook-Law-Of-Contracts/Actual-Receipt.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 01:43:54+00:00

Document:
33 Caulkins v. Hellman, 47 N. Y. 449. 7 Am. Rep. 461; Meehon v. Sharp, 131 Mass. 564, 24 N. E. 907; Smith v. Fisher, 59 Vt. 53, 7 Atl. 816; Garfield v. Paris, 96 U. S. 567, 24 L. Ed. 821. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 89; Cent. Dig. §§ 165-173.
34 Cases cited supra, note 28.
35 Caulkins v. Hellman, 47 N. T. 449, 7 Am. Rep. 461; Shepherd v. Pressey, 32 N. H. 49; Schmidt v. Thomas, 75 Wis. 529, 44 N. W. 771; Galvin v. Mac-Kenzie, 21 Or. 184, 27 Pac. 1039. It is sometimes said that mere words are not enough, but the cases in which such statements occur generally involve simply the proposition that they are not enough to constitute acceptance and receipt Shindler v. Houston, 1 N. Y. 261, 49 Am. Dec. 316. See Tiffany, Sales, 56. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 89; Cent. Dig. §§ 165-173.
36 Chaplin v. Rogers, 1 East 195; Phillips v. Ocmulgee Mills, 55 Ga. 633; Bacon v. Eccles, 43 Wis. 227, 238; Sullivan v. Sullivan, 70 Mich. 5S3, 38 N. W. 472; Patterson & Holden v. Sargeant, Osgood & Roundy Co., S3 Vt. 516, 77 Atl. 338, 138 Am. St. Rep. 1102. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 89; Cent. Dig. §§ 165-173.
37 KEMENSKY v. CHAPIN, 193 Mass. 500, 79 N. E. 781, 9 Ann. Cas. 1168, Throckmorton Cas. Contracts, 97. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 89; Cent. Dig. §§ 165-173.
38 Page v. Morgan, 15 Q. B. Div. 228; Taylor v. Smith  2 Q. B. 65. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 89; Cent. Dig. §§ 165-173.
39 Phillips v. Bristolli, 2 Barn. & C. 511; Safford v. McDonough, 120 Mass. 290; Marsh v. Rouse, 44 N. Y. 643; Hinchman v. Lincoln, 124 U. S. 38, 8 Sup. Ct 369, 31 L. Ed. 337. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 90; Cent. Dig. §§ 162-179.
40 Agnew v. Dumas, 64 Vt 147, 23 Atl. G34; Grey v. Cary, 9 Daly (N. Y.) 363. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 89; Cent. Dig. §§ 165-173.
41 Bullock v. Tschergi (C. C.) 4 McCrary, 184, 13 Fed. 345; Cross v. O'Don-nell, 44 N. T. 661, 4 Am. Rep. 721. See cases infra, note 43. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 90; Cent. Dig. §§ 162-119.
42Wait v. Baker, 2 Ex. 1; Wilcox Silver Plate Co. v. Green, 72 N. Y. 17; Sarbecker v. State, 65 Wis. 171, 26 N. W. 541, 56 Am. Rep. 624. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 90; Cent. Dig. §§ 162-179.
43KEMENSKY v. CHAPIN, 193 Mass. 500, 79 N. E. 781, 9 Ann. Cas. 1168, Throckmorton Cas. Contracts, 97; Hanson v. Armitage, 5 Barn. & Ald. 557; Hunt v. Hecht, 8 Ex. 814; Allard v. Greasert, 61 N. Y. 1, 5; Fontaine v Bush, 40 Minn. 141, 41 N. W. 465, 12 Am. St. Rep. 722. See "Frauds, Statute of,"' Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 90; Cent. Dig. §§ 162-179.
44Elmore v. Stone, 1 Taunt 458; Beaumont v. Brengeri, 5 C. B. 301; Green v. Merriam, 28 Vt 801; Rodgers v. Jones, 129 Mass. 420; Webster v. Anderson, 42 Mich. 554, 4 N. W. 288, 36 Am. Rep. 452. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 90; Cent. Dig. §§ 162-179.
45Edan v. Dudfield, 1 Q. B. 306; Lillywhite v. Devereux, 15 Mees. & W. 285; Snider v. Thrall, 56 Wis. 674, 14 N. W. 814; Godkin v. Weber, 154 Mich. 207, 114 N. W. 924, 117 N. W. 628, 20 L. R. A. (N. S.) 498.
But the mere fact that the goods are in the possession of the purchaser at the time of the sale does not of itself constitute such a receipt and acceptance as will satisfy the statute, unless it is so agreed by the parties, or the sale is followed by acts of ownership on the part of the purchaser. J. H. Silkman Lumber Co. v. Hunholz, 132 Wis. 610, 112 N. W. 1081, 11 L. R. A. (X. S.) 1186 and note, 122 Am. St Rep. 1008, 13 Ann. Cas. 713. See "Frauds, Statute of," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 90; Cent. Dig. §§ 162-179.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 89
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 89
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 89
 v. 
 § 89
 v. 
 v. 
 § 89
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 90
 v. 
 v. 
 § 89
 v. 
 v. 
 § 90
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 90
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 90
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 90
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 90