Source: https://www.ucmjdefense.com/resources/army-jag-school-criminal-law-deskbook-volume/military-justice-system-overview/court-martial-jurisdiction/urinalysis/defending-urinalysis-cases/defense-requested-tests.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 14:58:52+00:00

Document:
Tests for EME metabolite of cocaine.
The government is not required to perform the test for EME metabolite when requested by defense if the sample tested positive for BZE and the chain of custody is not contested. United States v. Metcalf, 34 M.J. 1056 (A.F.C.M.R. 1992); United States v. Pabon, No. 29878, 1994 WL 108866 (A.F.C.M.R. Mar. 25, 1994) (unpublished), aff’d, 42 M.J. 404 (C.A.A.F. 1995).
Positive test result for BZE (metabolite tested for within DOD) is sufficient to support conviction for wrongful use of cocaine; test for EME metabolite unnecessary. United States v. Thompson, 34 M.J. 287 (C.M.A. 1992).
where test for BZE was positive and test for EME was negative.
Tests for contaminants. United States v. Mosley, 42 M.J. 300 (C.A.A.F. 1995).
their discretion if they do.
Blood tests and DNA tests. United States v. Robinson, 39 M.J. 88 (C.M.A.
was unable to show discrepancies in collection or testing of sample.
introduced at trial. See also United States v. Williams, 39 M.J. 555 (A.C.M.R.
1994) (Mil. R. Evid. 707 is unconstitutional), set aside, 43 M.J. 348 (C.A.A.F.
testify). But see United States v. Wheeler, 66 M.J. 590 (N-M. Ct. Crim. App.
United States v. Cravens, 56 M.J. 370 (C.A.A.F. 2002).
for re-litigation of this issue using the proper standard of United States v.
Pharmeceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993).
the Use of Hair Sample Testing for Drug Use in the Military, 188 Mil. L.
Army Law., Jan. 1991, at 10. See also United States v. Adens, 56 M.J.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.