Source: https://mentalhealthsummit.wordpress.com/summit-policy-positions/persons-with-mental-illnesses-in-nursing-homes/
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 04:01:05+00:00

Document:
There are approximately 12,000 persons with mental illnesses in nursing homes.
There are more than 4,500 persons with mental illnesses in so-called “IMD” nursing homes. An IMD nursing home is one in which more than half of the residence have a primary diagnosis of mental illness. Under federal law, these facilities are not eligible for federal Medicaid funding.
It costs more than $30,000 per year of state General Revenue Funds (GRF) to keep someone in an IMD.
Nursing homes in Illinois, including IMD nursing homes, rarely provide high quality mental health services. Specifically, few IMDs provide residents with detailed treatment plans designed to promote recovery and frequently fail to take steps to place residents in less restrictive community alternatives.
Among the problems in Nursing Homes is the misuse of psychotropic medications. In May, 2011, the Inspector General of the US Department of Health and Human Services issued a comprehensive report documenting this problem.
Many persons in IMD nursing homes could survive safely in the community if they were provided with comprehensive community mental health services which would cost less than the cost of care in an IMD. Additionally, many of these services would be eligible for reimbursement under Medicaid which would enable Illinois to obtain additional federal financial support.
Their inability to save money needed to move due to the very low personal needs allowance of $30/month.
Difficulty/delay in obtaining access to their SSI funds upon discharge.
Illinois is facing a class action in Williams v. Quinn alleging that its placement of so many persons with mental illnesses in IMD nursing homes violates the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) as interpreted by the United States Supreme Court in Olmstead v. LC. Plaintiffs are represented by Summit members Equip for Equality and Access Living (as well as the ACLU of Illinois and other counsel) in this litigation. In 2010, the Federal District Court approved a consent decree in which the state agree to begin a five year process of moving persons with mental illnesses out of IMDs.
Illinois has also entered into a second consent decree, Colbert v. Quinn, agreeing to a five year plan to move people with disabilities out of nursing homes in Cook County.
In response to a serious of articles in the Chicago Tribune, the Governor appointed a Nursing Home Safety Task Force. That group has conducted hearings in Springfield and Chicago. Written materials presented at these hearings are now available. On January 14, 2010, the Task Force released is Draft Recommendations. These recommendations are linked below.
On February 18, 2010, the Task Force released its final recommendations.
Applies only one small section (governing involuntary medication) of the Mental health and Developmental Disabilites Code to nursing homes which treat persons with mental illnesses.
Fails to provide for the implementation of the proposed settlement in Williams v. Quinn.
In May, 2011, the Illinois legislature passed Senate Bill 145 which has now been signed into law as Public Act 97-0038. This 700-page bill was only made public a few days before it was voted on by the legislature, giving mental health and nursing home advocates little opportunity for review and comment. The bill creates a new class of nursing home called a Specialized Mental Health Rehabilitation Facilities. Only five nursing homes qualify for this designation. The bill is designed to insure that the state’s nursing home bed tax/rate increase plan passes scrutiny with the Federal government for the purposes of Medicaid reimbursement. That plan was in jeopardy because it excludes these five facilities from the bed tax. Now these facilities are no longer considered nursing homes even thought more than 95% of this new law is borrowed word-for-word from the Nursing Home Care Act and the regulations promulgated under this new law are the nursing home regulations. The Summit opposed this bill because it will make permanent a class of nursing home which should be abolished. A letter explaining this opposition is linked below.
In 2013, the IMD nursing home owners implemented the second phase of their plan to continue to warehouse persons with mental illnesses when, at the last minute, they succeeded in amending the bill expanding Medicaid to include elaborate provisions giving IMD nursing homes the power to engage in a variety of new services. These facilities, called Specialized Mental Health Rehabilitation Facilities (SMHRFs) have now been the subject of detailed rule-making. Click here for materials detailing the Summit’s concerns about the SMHRF legislation and rules.
Illinois must create and enforce standards ensuring that persons with mental illnesses who reside in nursing homes due primarily to a medical condition other than a mental illness are provided with appropriate mental health services. Inspections and evaluations of all nursing homes should include review by personnel who are competent by virtue of their training and experience to determine whether appropriate mental health services are being provided to all residents who need them.
Illinois should enforce the decision of the Illinois Appellate Court in Muellner v. Blessing.(excerpts from this decision are linked below.) Muellner affords residents of IMD nursing homes (and special mental health units within other nursing homes) the protections offered by theMental Health and Developmental Disabilities Code. While the Nursing Home Care Act does contain some protections for nursing home residents, this Act says almost nothing about mental health services and the rights of persons with mental illnesses. The passage of Senate Bill 1982 would greatly assist in this process.
Depression is not a natural condition for the elderly. Nursing homes should conduct periodic depression screening and ensure that appropriate treatment follows.
Increase the personal needs allowance for Medicaid recipients to at least $75/month to reflect inflation since the last increase 15 years ago.
Summit comments on DHS’s Williams v. Quinn Draft Implementation Plan.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.