Source: http://samarskie-dacniki.ru/1st+dating+international/3455.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 11:17:51+00:00

Document:
The Director may consider the failure to submit such an amendment within that time period as a waiver of any benefit under this section. The later-filed application must claim the benefit of the intermediate nonprovisional application under 35 U. The Director may establish procedures, including the requirement for payment of the fee specified in section 41(a)(7), to accept an unintentionally delayed submission of an amendment under this section. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c) or, provided the later-filed application is not a design application (see 35 U.
The Office may not recognize any benefit claim where, for example, there is no indication of the relationship between the nonprovisional applications, or no indication of an intermediate nonprovisional application that is directly claiming the benefit of a provisional application. Even if the Office has recognized a benefit claim by entering it into the Office’s database and including it on applicant’s filing receipt, the benefit claim is not a proper benefit claim under 35 U.
Patents usually will be published within four weeks of payment of the issue fee. 371(d) indicates that failure to timely comply with the requirements of 35 U.
Thus, the later-filed application may be filed under 37 CFR 1.53(b) while the prior application is still pending before the examiner, or is in issue, or even between the time the issue fee is paid and the patent issues. 371(c) “shall be regarded as abandonment of the application by the parties thereof.” It is therefore clear that an international application which designates the United States has the effect of a pending U. application from the international application filing date until its abandonment as to the United States.
When proceedings in an application are terminated, the application is treated in the same manner as an abandoned application, and the term “abandoned application” may be used broadly to include such applications. Appropriate references must be made in each intermediate application in the chain of prior applications. Thus, rather than submitting a national stage application under 35 U.
The term “abandoned,” refers to abandonment for failure to prosecute (MPEP § 711.02), express abandonment (MPEP § 711.01), abandonment for failure to pay the issue fee (37 CFR 1.316), and abandonment for failure to notify the Office of a foreign filing after filing a nonpublication request under 35 U. There are several other situations in which proceedings are terminated as is explained in MPEP § 711.02(c). The reference to the prior applications must identify all of the prior applications and indicate the relationship (i.e., continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part) between each nonprovisional application in order to establish copendency throughout the entire chain of prior applications. 371, applicant may file a continuation, divisional, or continuation-in-part of an international (PCT) application under 35 U. The ability to take such action is based on provisions of the United States patent law.
If the prior application is abandoned, the later-filed application must be filed before the abandonment in order for it to be copending with the prior application. After a decision by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in which the rejection of all claims is affirmed, the proceeding is terminated when the mandate is issued by the Court. To claim the benefit of the filing date of an international application, the international application must designate the United States and be entitled to a filing date in accordance with PCT Article 11, and the later-filed application must be filed during the pendency (e.g., prior to the abandonment) of the international application.
Applicants are encouraged to file any continuing applications no later than the date the issue fee is paid, to avoid issuance of the prior application before the continuing application is filed. The expression “termination of proceedings” includes the situations when an application is abandoned or when a patent has been issued, and hence this expression is the broadest of the three copendency definitions. Such applications are often referred to as “bypass” applications. 363 provides that “An international application designating the United States shall have the effect, from its international filing date under article 11 of the treaty, of a national application for patent regularly filed in the Patent and Trademark Office.” 35 U. The later-filed application may be referred to as a continuing application when the prior application is not a provisional application. A later-filed application which is not copending with the prior application (which includes those called “substitute” applications as set forth in MPEP § 201.02) is not entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the prior application. Copendency between the current application and the prior application is required. There is no limit to the number of prior applications through which a chain of copendency may be traced to obtain the benefit of the filing date of the earliest of a chain of prior copending applications. 119(e) must be filed within 12 months from the filing date of the provisional application unless the benefit of the provisional application has been restored. 2008) wherein the district court interpreted “before” to mean “not later than” and allowed a continuation application filed the same day that the parent patent issued to have the benefit of the filing date of the parent application. The term “continuity” is used to express the relationship of copendency of the same subject matter in two different applications naming the same inventor or at least one joint inventor in common. See MPEP § 211.02 for guidance regarding properly referencing prior applications. RESTORING THE BENEFIT OF A PROVISIONAL APPLICATIONEffective December 18, 2013, title II of the Patent Law Treaties Implementation Act (PLTIA) provides for restoration of the right to claim benefit of a provisional application filed after the expiration of the twelve-month period in 35 U. As a result of the implementation of title I of the PLTIA, 37 CFR 1.78(a) and (b) were amended effective May 13, 2015, to provide that a petition to restore the right of priority filed on or after May 13, 2015, must be filed in the subsequent application and to clarify that the subsequent application is the application required to be filed within the period set forth in 37 CFR 1.78(a)(1)(i). However, this application was not filed within twelve months from the filing date of the provisional application, and there is no indication of an intermediate nonprovisional application or international application designating the United States that is directly claiming the benefit of the provisional application and filed within 12 months of the filing date of the provisional application. A petition under 37 CFR 1.78(b) to restore the benefit of the provisional application must include: (1) the reference required by 35 U. A petition to restore the benefit of a provisional application must be filed in the subsequent application. COPENDENCYWhen a later-filed application is claiming the benefit of a prior-filed nonprovisional application under 35 U. Copendency is defined in the clause which requires that the later-filed application must be filed before: (A) the patenting of the prior application; (B) the abandonment of the prior application; or (C) the termination of proceedings in the prior application. If a benefit claim to a provisional application is submitted without an indication that an intermediate application directly claims the benefit of the provisional application and the instant nonprovisional application is not filed within the 12 month period (or 14 month period if the benefit of the provisional application has been restored pursuant to 37 CFR 1.78(b)) or the relationship between each nonprovisional application is not indicated, the Office will not recognize such benefit claim and will not include the benefit claim on the filing receipt. Thus, an application may now validly claim the benefit of a provisional application filed up to fourteen months earlier. Alternatively, applicant may wish to file a petition to restore the benefit of the provisional application under 37 CFR 1.78 in the subsequent nonprovisional application or international application designating the United States if the subsequent application was filed within two months from the expiration of the twelve-month period and the delay was unintentional. 119(e) and 37 CFR 1.78 to the prior-filed provisional application (unless previously submitted); (2) the petition fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(m); and (3) a statement that the delay in filing the subsequent nonprovisional application or international application designating the United States within the twelve-month period was unintentional. 120, 121, 365(c), or 386(c), the later-filed application must be copending with the prior application or with an intermediate nonprovisional application similarly entitled to the benefit of the filing date of the prior application. Use form paragraphs 2.09 and 2.11 to indicate the benefit claim under 35 U. This application is claiming the benefit of prior-filed application No. If applicant wishes that the pending application have the benefit of the filing date of the first filed application, applicant must, besides making reference to the intermediate application, also make reference to the first application. See MPEP § 211.02 for guidance regarding properly referencing prior applications. a national application shall be entitled to the benefit of the filing date of a prior international application designating the United States.” The condition of 35 U.

References: § 711
 § 711
 § 711
 § 201
 § 211
 § 211