Source: https://blog.imla.org/2014/09/monday-morning-review-local-governments-in-the-federal-appellate-courts-46/?shared=email&msg=fail
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 22:18:21+00:00

Document:
D.E. v. Cent. Dauphin Sch. Dist., No. 13-1294 (Aug. 27, 2014): The court affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment for school district on D.E.’s ADA and Rehabilitation Act claims, reversed the district court’s dismissal of IDEA claims for failure to exhaust, and concluded that D.E. is a person “aggrieved” under the IDEA when he sought to enforce a favorable decision that he obtained at the administrative level.
Davis v. Fort Bend County, No. 13-20610 (Aug. 26, 2014): The court affirmed in part and reversed in part the district court’s grant of summary judgment for County, in suit brought by former employee allegiing discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act.
Red River Freethinkers v. City of Fargo, No. 13-1934 (Aug. 25, 2014): The court affirmed that Ten Commandments monument is permissible under the Establishment Clause.
Williams v. Holley, No. 13-3720 (Aug. 25, 2014): The court affirmed denial of summary judgment to officer on qualified immunity grounds in case alleging that officer used excessive force in tasing and shooting Williams’s father.
Cruz v. City of Anaheim, No. 12-55481 (Aug. 28, 2014): In case arising out of police officers’ shooting of Cesar Cruz, the court affirmed in part and reversed in part district court’s grant of summary judgment for officers.
Blue v. D.C. Pub. Schools, No. 12-7122 (Aug. 29, 2014): In suit brought by student abused by teacher against school district, the court found that appeal was untimely because the district court had not resolved additional claims against one defendant, and therefore there was no final judgment.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.