Source: http://fathersunite.org/Writ_of_Certiorari_US_Supreme_Court.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 18:26:15+00:00

Document:
Jeffrey R. Rosenberg and Daniel V. Kinsella, of the Chicago law firm Schuyler, Roche & Zwirner, P.C., are attorneys employed by Michael Moner. The attorneys engaged in the practice of 'padding' their petitions for fees. Their acts were aided and abetted by two judges in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Brigid M. McGrath and Paddy H. McNamara. All are respondents.
Petitioner moved the Federal district court for direct access to the Federal grand jury to present his evidence of the mail frauds and other crimes perpetrated by the judicial and attorney respondents against petitioner, pursuant to Title 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a) and F.R.Civ.P. 6(a).
The the lower court conspicuously avoided the well-pled assertion of this right by improper application of the Rooker-Feldman abstention doctrine.
"...appellant sought and was denied an order compelling a federal grand jury to investigate alleged crimes committed by the various defendants. In challenging those denials, he persists with his frivolous contention that he is entitled to appear before a grand jury to present his allegations. See Korman v. United States, 486 F.2d 926, 933 (7th Cir. 1973) (holding that authority to convene federal grand jury is vested in district court); cf. Cook v. Smith, 834 P.2d 418, 420-21 (N.M. 1992) (recognizing New Mexico’s procedure permitting citizens to petition for convening a grand jury as rare). Appellant admits that the goal of his proposed investigation is to lead to the prosecution of the individuals that he has sued, but a private citizen lacks standing to demand the prosecution of another. See Linda R.S. v. Richard D., 410 U.S. 614, 619 (1973); Johnson v. City of Evanston, Ill., 250 F.3d 560, 563 (7th Cir. 2001)."
This Writ for Certiorari seeks to test the application of checks and balances. It asks the Supreme Court to settle the intent of Congress in 18 U.S.C. § 3332(a) and to determine whether the “public interest” in F.R.Civ.P. 6(a) should be excepted by those against whom it is invoked.
Did Congress intend that the subjects of inquiry (judges) be the gatekeepers of inquiry and if so, would this sanction a conflict of interest against the public interest?
Judges routinely ignore 18 U. S. C. § 242. They have given themselves the power to block all investigations of judicial corruption. It is impossible to get a criminal complaint against a judge, past a judge. Thus, judges are above the law.
The "inalienable" civil right to enjoy a fair trial exists at the judiciary's pleasure.
For the reason set forth above, this petition for a writ of certiorari should be granted.

References: V. 
 § 3332
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 3332
 § 242