Source: http://cal-span.org/unipage/?site=cal-span&owner=CARB&date=2015-10-22&mode=large
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 18:15:31+00:00

Document:
The item on the consent calendar will be presented to the Board immediately after the start of this second day of the public meeting, unless removed from the consent calendar either upon a Board member’s request or if someone in the audience wishes to speak on it.
The Board will consider accepting the Shasta Regional Transportation Agency's determination that its 2015 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, if implemented, would achieve the region's per capita greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets for 2020 and 2035 set by the Air Resources Board.
The Board will consider accepting the Tulare County Association of Governments' determination that its 2014 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, if implemented, would achieve the region's per capita greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets for 2020 and 2035 set by the Air Resources Board.
Public Meeting to Consider the Greenhouse Gas Quantification Determination for the Kings County Association of Governments' Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy.
The Board will consider accepting the Kings County Association of Governments' determination that its 2014 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy, if implemented, would achieve the region's per capita greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets for 2020 and 2035 set by the Air Resources Board.
The Board will consider approving an update to the Fiscal Year 2015-16 Funding Plan for Low Carbon Transportation Investments and the Air Quality Improvement Program, originally approved by the Board in June 2015 pending appropriation of funds in the 2015-16 State Budget. The Board-approved plan was predicated on a $350 million Low Carbon Transportation appropriation. In September 2015, the Legislature approved a partial appropriation of $90 million. Staff proposes to allocate the $90 million toward three ongoing projects and delaying implementation of the remaining projects in the Funding Plan until additional funding is appropriated.
Staff will present to the Board the mobile source strategy and measure concepts described in the “Mobile Source Strategy Discussion Draft.” The presentation will discuss how the comprehensive strategy outlines many of the mobile source actions needed to meet air quality standards, greenhouse gas and petroleum reduction targets, as well as sustainable freight planning. Based on Board direction provided in response to the presentation, staff will work with the air districts to further develop the measure concepts into control measures for subsequent consideration by each air district for inclusion in their State Implementation Plan submittals that are due in 2016 for meeting federal air quality standards.
Staff will present to the Board an update on on-going work related to the Advanced Clean Cars mid-term review, including updates on work with Federal agencies, current Zero Emission Vehicle sales, and research contracts related to consumers.
Staff, along with invited experts, will update the Board on efforts to enable zero emission vehicle markets. The update will cover fueling infrastructure, fleet purchases, multi-state and national partnerships, and other relevant topics.
Staff will present to the Board an assessment of the feasibility of measuring Particulate Matter (PM) emissions, at and below 1 mg/mi. This informational item is in response to industry concerns about low-level PM emissions measurement. The staff presentation will include the progress made, in cooperation with various stakeholders, in gravimetric PM emission determination at and below 1 mg/mi. In addition to presenting these findings, staff will also provide an evaluation of other approaches to PM emission measurement.
American Fuels and Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al. v. Jane O’Keeffe, et al., U.S. District Court (D. Ore. Portland), Case No. 3:15-CV-00467.
Sarah Farley v. California Air Resources Board, Superior Court of California (Sacramento County), Case No. 34-2015-80002044.
Case No. 09CECG04850; plaintiffs’ appeal, California Court of Appeal, Fifth District, Case No. F064045; California Supreme Court, Case No. S213394. [remanded to trial court].
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, et al. v. Corey, U.S. District Court (E.D. Cal. Fresno), Case No. 1:09−CV−02234−LJO−DLB; ARB interlocutory appeal, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 09-CV-02234 [remanded to trial court].
American Fuels and Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al. v. Corey, et al., U.S. District Court (E.D. Cal. Fresno), Case No. 1:10-CV-00163-AWI-GSA; ARB’s interlocutory appeal, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 10-CV-00163 [remanded to trial court].
California Dump Truck Owners Association v. Nichols, U.S. District Court (E.D. Cal. Sacramento), Case No. 2:11-CV-00384-MCE-GGH; plaintiffs’ appeal, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 13-15175.
Engine Manufacturers Association v. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2010-00082774; ARB’s successful appeal, California Court of Appeal, Third District, Case No. C071891 [remanded to the trial court].
Truck and Engine Manufacturers Association v. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2013-00150733.
Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers v. California Air Resources Board; Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2013-00152974.
California Chamber of Commerce et al. v. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2012-80001313; plaintiffs’ appeal, California Court of Appeal, Third District, Case No. C075930.
Delta Construction Company, et al. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Case No. 11-1428.
Dalton Trucking, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Case No. 13-1283.
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Inc. et al. v. Richard W. Corey et al., U.S. District Court, (E.D. Cal. Fresno) Case No. 1:13-CV-01998-LJO-SAB (transferred by court to E.D.Cal. Sacramento, Case No. 2:14-CV-00186-MCE-AC).
Jack Cody dba Cody Transport v. California Air Resources Board, et al. (Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2015-80002116.
CO-AL Transport v. California Environmental Protection Agency et al., (United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 15-70839).
John R. Lawson Rock & Oil, Inc. et al. v. California Air Resources Board et al., Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 14-CECG01494.
Transportation Solutions Defense and Education Fund v. California Air Resources Board, Fresno County Superior Court, Case No. 14CECG01788 (plaintiff’s transfer to Sacramento Superior).
California Air Resources Board v. BP West Coast Products LLC, Contra Costa County Superior Court, Case No. C12-00567.
Sacramento Metropolitan Air Quality Management District v. Hardesty Sand & Gravel, et al. (Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2011-00101272).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.