Source: http://www.mrdickson.net/law-enforcement-journal/august-23rd-2018
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 16:37:51+00:00

Document:
There is more technology like cameras that you wear, dash cameras and more helpful technology. In 1961, a state Supreme Court had a case that involved the rights of an officer to stop a suspicious man standing in an alley. The role now a days is most likely the same thing as back then just keeping the peace with the county or city whatever your over. You are also supposed to be on patrol and you can not go home until you are told to go home.
1.I believe the role of police has changed from a terrifying law enforcer part of the government to there own person to the point where we are no longer scared of them and even make friend with them, talk to them and basically treat them like a human being.
2. I also believe police can now enforce alot more of the law than before due to lack of resources I also think that a there has been a type of equilibrium established where the police can do there job and not be considered a public nuisance.
3. Finally a the case I found most interesting was Bargain City V. Dilworth mostly because I found it very upsurd to deny the selling of goods for a day because of a so called "Bargain City" in the outskirts instead of making it a thing to require to have a proper store to sell any goods and also require a more updated state permit to sell goods.
1.police have changed over the time I believe , back then there wasn’t a lot of understanding or communication between law enforcers and courts. Police would try to set they’re own rules or do what they do but courts would limit they’re authorities. As time went by courts and police have been coming to certain types of agreements of the law enforcing and court procedures.
2. I think some of the reasearch has changed because law enforcement has been growing and growing ever since and so have courts and lawyers. Police have been able to receive more things to help them in they’re daily shifts for example , material wise.
3. I found it interesting that the court had a cop explain to them why he had stopped and questioned a suspicious male by a private property . They talked about his rights as a cops and everything like that , and they also mentioned that the government of “laws” was made so that no man or civilian could take advantage of the power laws hold.
3) the case I found interesting is the one in Philadelphia in which you could not do business on a Sunday it was a very unique law in which I found has no purpose because people would go outside the town for goods.
1.) The role of police has changed by them getting more involved into the community where there is trust being built.
2.) I believe that things have changed since then because now there are a lot more resources and technology that is available for police then there was back then.
3.) I found the case of Escobedo v. Illinois interesting because it was the case that made it clear that there was a need of better communication between police officers and the court.
1:I think the role police change because in ancient society, police does not have a written laws and there's always some problems between them and the courts.Also they create their own policy rather than being given by the court.But in modern day, police had to memorize the laws which were given by the court.
2:I think the research had change since it was written because in today society,the cops were under the government and they also had so many better resources due to technology.
3:The interesting thing that i found in research was that how police were so afraid of telling their difficult tasks to public because it will be very hard for the cops to keep on silent while the citizens criticize about their weakness asnan officer.i think it also be very difficult for the cops when the citizens hated them.
I believe the role of police has changed from a terrifying law enforcement to a law enforcement that can actually try to understand everyone instead of being brutal to people of different kinds I also believe that police actually are enforcing that law because they have the resources they need.Finally a the case I found most interesting was Bargain City V. Dilworth mostly because I found it very upsurd to deny the selling of goods for a day because of a so called "Bargain City" in the outskirts instead of making it a thing to require to have a proper store to sell any goods and also require a more updated state permit to sell goods.
1) I don’t think police itself has changed that much throughout the years but I do think that the laws have changed and that might have caused the police to become more strict about certain things.
3) The case I found interesting was the Philadelphia one, I find it really hard to understand why they would not let them do business on Sundays because at the end of the day they are the ones losing money.
1) I think the role of police has changed because there is more technology.
2) research has changed due to the new technology and that it was updated.
3) one of the cases that seemed interesting was the one in Philadelphia because I didn’t understand why they wouldn’t want people doing work on sundays.
1. I believe that the role of police officers has changed because the community model era started five years after this article was written and new technological development have occurred to create a more efficient police force in America. 2. The research from this article has changed due to new technology that creates new and unique circumstances for today's police officers. 3. The case that interested me the most was Bargain City V. Dilworth, because I did not understand why it was made illegal to sell gods on Sundays. Honestly, Sundays seem like the most convenient time to do trade because most people have that day off for church. It also did not make sense to me that the chief of police only decided to go after the shops that sold the most. That worries me because that is not fair and the law needs to be enforced fairly.
1) The role of police has changed since 1965 because we are in a new Era, this paper is 53 years old as well. Times have changed so has police, who serve the Community and are more efficient now.
2) The research has changed because there is more technology in the world and different problems than there used to be.
3) the Court Case that I thought was interesting was the “Sunday Blue law” case because They dismissed the case but the case right after this one the “ Federal Trade Commission” case contrasted this one. Which was very interesting.
1) The role of policeman has definitely changed because of technology, which makes LE more efficient than before. So many things happen in 53 years and it can only benefit us into knowing more than before.
2) I believe research has changed in a way of having, again, technological advances that help advance officers to being closer to documents and the government only making it quicker and easier.
3) The most interesting case was for sure Bargain City v. Dilworth because it seemed crazy that they wouldn’t want them to trade on sundays. Mostly everyone is off on sundays which seems like it would only make it easier on them to make money.
1. I think it has changed by the way they interact with the community and how technology advanced.
2. Yes i believe that the research has changed due to the fact that both technology and society have evolved.
3. The one that i found the most intresting is where they didn't let people trade on sundays.
1. Police work has definitely changed over the years because of the technology, 53 years ago our technology wasn’t as advanced and we can trust the police now.
2. I believe it’s changed because the police force keeps growing and the bigger they get the more training and structure they have to have also I believe technology was a big part of the change.
3. The case I found interesting was the Bargain City vs. Dilworth because I found it unreasonable for them not to want to sell something to someone just because it was Sunday.
1. I think the roles of police officers has changed because they communicate more with us and the courts so that makes us and the courts trust them a lot more.
2. Yes because police act and speak differently then they did when this was written.
3. In Pennsylvania they were not able to sell goods on Sundays and I found this interesting because the police commissioner took the side of the people and not the Pennsylvania legislature.
1. The change has been more technology.
2. Yes, suspects have a right to talk to their lawyer and the police have to state their rights.
3. Escobedo v. Illinois because the suspect was denied "the assistance of counsel" .
Policeman have became more comfortable with the public over the last few years and it's made their lives and our lives more easier to develop some type of trust in the community and in the police work force myself and yes the one I find more interesting more than the others is the one in Philadelphia where your not allowed to work on Sunday because some people like it and others don't personally I like it because as a Christian Sunday is where you take a break from work it's a very chill day it's where you can just relax and then think about the week that is upcoming.
1) Over the past 53 years, the role of police and law enforcement officers has changed for the better. We’re slowly starting to build trust that wasn’t there before.
2) Yes, I believe things have changed since then because our technology and techniques have advanced. Instead of creating their own policies, officers are trained to memorize the law of the land.
3) One of the court cases i found interesting was Escobedo vs. Illinois because it helped better the lack of communication in the system.
1) The role of police has changed on account of many things. For one law enforcement now has more resources and technology, better communication amount the public and courts, and also a better structure on how to run their business in law enforcement. They are generally more aware and informed about their role and job as to how it relates and their responsibilities.
2) Yes the research has changed because not only has technology grown, so has law enforcement. They are now better and trained for their field. Law enforcement is not the same compared to how it used to be so this research has changed as well.
3) One of the court cases I found interested was the one involving an officer and a person in an alley under suspicious circumstances. Unfortunately the department was in no position to present which reflects on back on the court case and not allow a fair case to agrue. The police department did not have a clear policy or prectipr which reflects on how they do their job. If they were more reliable and responsible then the case would've blown the other direction and would be handled with proper action.
1. There is a lot of things that has changed. Officers are supposed to carry out the law and ensure that people in there communities are safe. Officers are supposed to be professional at the work place not friendly.
3. I found it interesting that In Pennsylvania the police commissioner took the side of the people and not the Pennsylvania legislature when in law enforcement your supposed to carry out the law so it’s not bias.
3. I found Escobedo vs. Illinois the most interesting because of that case the communication got stronger with them and the community.
1. Police has changed over time by the way they communicate with the courts. Back then police didn’t listen much to courts and would try to do their own thing. There is also more trust between us and police.
2. Back then their resources weren’t as good as today’s do to their lack of technology.
3. The case I found that was the most interesting was “Sunday Blue Law” because they couldn’t get to a judge so they dismissed the case but right after they dismissed it they had another case contradicting it.
1.) police have changed because they have more resources and ways to communicate with each other and the community.
2.) Until recently, police haven’t had much technology.
3.) the most interesting case I found was working on Sunday in Pennsylvania. Most people need to work everyday in order to take care of themselves and their family.
1. It's good to see a difference in technology as now patrol cars have radios and cameras inside as in the 1960's police never had the ability to record incidents of violence while on call.
2. Police in Pennsylvania had to work on Sunday in order to stop people selling goods while the commisioner was on the side of the people and disregarded the legislation.
3. The court case Escobedo vs Illinois as it increased communication for the officers.
1. It depicts the police as hiding lots of things from the people because of fear of being discharged or put on media which is really similar to what happens today. I think the depiction of police is definitely a bit different from today but the role to protect and serve should still be there.
2. I don’t have a clue how research has changed.
3. I found the article about the police chief not enforcing the curfew policy and saying that the people’s kids have been out past curfew but nothing bad happened interesting because the news article the next day completely humiliates him by asking if the force is enforcing the law or the people’s thoughts.
1. It's good to see a difference in technology as now cop cars have dash cams inside and in the 1960's police never had the ability to record incidents of violence while on call.
2. Police in Pennsylvania had to work on Sunday in order to stop people selling goods while the commissioner was on the side of the people and had disregarded the legislation.
3. The court case Escobedo vs Illinois as it had increased the communication for the officers.
3.Escobedo v. Illinois because the suspect was denied the assistance of counsel.
1. I believe police now a days are more involved with their community and they have more resources and technology to do their job more efficiently.
3. To me the case of the “Sunday blue laws” was interesting and how no one could sell or do business on sundays which could affect many businesses in not making money.
The role of police hasn’t really changed just evolved or adapted to modern society. For example community policing; Police are still there to enforce the law but in these times it’s important tht the officer is involved in the community and builds trust with a society that looks at police as the enemy.
1. A change of values has changed.
2. Technology has changed the research since they didn’t have any back then.
3. I found the Philadelphia case the most eye appealing because it said that you could not do business on a sunday. it was an odd law for when most people would go out on weekends to buy goods.
3) the case found interesting is the one in Philadelphia in which you could not do business on a Sunday it was a very unique law in which I found has no purpose because people would go outside the town for goods.

References: V. 
 v. 
 V. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.