Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Law-Real-Estate-Brokers/Broker-Must-Be-Procuring-Cause-Of-Sale-Part-8.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 17:53:02+00:00

Document:
61 Levy v. Wolf, 84 Pac. 313 (Cal. 1905), (citing Tyler ▼. Parr, 52 Mo. 249; Jones v. Adler, 34 Md. 440).
62 Platt v. Johr. 9 Ind. App. 61 (1893).
63 Leech v. Clemons, 14 Colo. App. 48 (1899); Wright v. McClIntock, 136 111. App. 441 (1907). And see Sec. 96 supra.
64 Church v. Dunham, 14 Idaho 782 (1908), (citing Wood v. Broderson. 12 Idaho 190: 85 Pac 490; Lemon v. De Wolf, 89 Minn. 465; 95 N. W. 316; note to Ward T. Cobb, 12 Am. St. Rep. 589).
65 Colonial Trust Co. v. Pacific Co., 158 Fed. 280 (1907).
66 Kalfstein v. Jackson, 132 App. Div. 1 (N. Y. 1909); Hafner v. Herron, 165 111. 24C (1897).
67 Getzelsohn v. Donnelly, 50 Misc. 164 (N. Y. 1906).
68 Bright v. Canadian Int. Stock Yard Co., 83 Hun 482 (N. Y. 1895). See also "Emplovment," Sec. 103-112 supra.
69 Young v. Ruhwedel, 119 Mo. App. 242 (1906).
70 Doran v. Bussard. 18 App. Div. 387 (N. Y. 1897) ; Bell v. Kaiser. 50 Mo. 150 (1872); Goffe v. Gibson, 18 Mo. App. 4 (1885); Latta v. King, 6 D. C. 310 (1868).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.