Source: https://www.johndaylegal.com/42-3-death-of-a-minor.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 17:59:59+00:00

Document:
The Case: Lemons v. Cloer , 206 S.W.3d 60 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2006).
The Basic Facts: Parents of children killed in bus wreck filed wrongful death claims. Defendants asserted statute of limitations defense as to the claims asserted on behalf of two of the children, both of which were filed more than one year after the wreck.
"The last issue we must resolve is whether the trial court erred in holding that the wrongful death claims brought on behalf of Daniel Pack and Kayla Silvers are barred by the one-year personal injury statute of limitations. The relevant facts are these. The collision occurred on March 28, 2000. The wrongful death claims of two of the three children killed in the collision, Pack and Silvers, were filed by their respective parents, Cynthia Sluder and Jimmy Silvers, in June, 2003, as were the personal injury claims of three of the other children injured in the accident. The School District filed a motion for summary judgment, arguing that all of these claims were barred by the applicable one-year statute of limitations. In September, 2004, the trial court granted the School District partial summary judgment pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.02, concluding that the Sluder and Silvers wrongful death claims are barred by the statute of limitations found at Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-3-104, and that the claims were not tolled by Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-1-106. The School District's motion for summary judgment was denied as to the personal injury claims asserted on behalf of these three children injured in the accident." 206 S.W.3d at 69-70.
"Sluder and Silvers argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment with respect to their actions because, according to them, Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-1-106 allowed them to bring suit up to one year after their child's emancipation would have taken place, had they lived. First, it is important to note that 'our courts have uniformly applied the one-year statute of limitation contained in § 28-3-104 governing actions for personal injuries to actions for wrongful death.' Collier v. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Div., 657 S.W.2d 771, 774 (Tenn. Ct. App.1983) (citing Jones v. Black, 539 S.W.2d 123 (Tenn. 1976)). Furthermore, in Jordan v. Baptist Three Rivers Hosp., 984 S.W.2d 593 (Tenn. 1999), the Supreme Court held that, in wrongful death actions, the 'pecuniary value of a decedent's life includes the element of damages commonly referred to as loss of consortium.' Id. at 595. In other words, loss of consortium-type damages 'do[ ] not create a new cause of action but merely refine[ ] the term 'pecuniary value.'' Id. at 601. Thus, the one-year statute of limitations period also applies to the loss of consortium aspect of the wrongful death claim. See Hancock v. Chattanooga-Hamilton County Hosp. Auth., 54 S.W.3d 234, 237 (Tenn.2001)." Id. at 70.
If the person entitled to commence an action is, at the time the cause of action accrued, either within the age of eighteen (18) years, or of unsound mind, such person, or such person's representatives and privies, as the case may be, may commence the action, after the removal of such disability, within the time of limitation for the particular cause of action, unless it exceeds three (3) years, and in that case within three (3) years from the removal of such disability.
The death of a person under disability removes the disability and sets the statute to running; thus, if a person under a disability, such as the deceased mother in this case, had a cause of action for personal injuries, that action must be commenced within one year after his or her death.
Collier, 657 S.W.2d at 774 (quoting Jones v. Black, 539 S.W.2d at 126) (Brock, J., dissenting). Sluder and Silvers brought their wrongful death claims more than three years after the death of their minor children. Because Tennessee's one-year statute of limitations applies to these claims, and because Tenn. Code Ann. § 28-1-106 does not have the effect of tolling the limitations period, the trial court correctly dismissed the Sluder and Silvers claims." Id. at 70-71.

References: v. 
 § 28
 § 28
 § 28
 § 28
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 28