Source: https://masseygail.com/experience/experience-consumer-fraud.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 18:54:09+00:00

Document:
Former FDA Commissioner as amicus curiae in a case presenting the question whether a private party can bring a Lanham Act claim challenging a product label regulated under the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. Pom Wonder LLC, v. The Coca-Cola Company, 134 S. Ct. 2228 (2014). See 2014 WL 891762 (brief).
A group of amici medical researchers in a class action against a pharmaceutical company and three of its executives alleging that defendants violated federal securities laws by failing to disclose material information regarding one of the company’s products. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. Siracusano, 131 S.Ct. 1309 (2011).
An amicus brief on behalf of non-profit citizens’ advocacy groups on behalf of a state attorney general pursuing discovery from Google regarding illegal acts advertised through Google and YouTube. No. 14-CV-981 (S.D. Miss.).
A group of amici scholars in a case presenting the question whether, in the absence of any claim that an alleged violation of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 affected the price, quality, or other characteristics of the settlement services provided, a private purchaser of real estate settlement services has standing to sue under Article III. First American Financial Corp. v. Edwards, No. 10-708 (U.S. S.Ct.).
A group of motor fuel retailers in a multi-district litigation proceeding involving a series of class actions alleging that the sale of motor fuel without compensating for weather-related changes in volume and temperature was fraudulent. In re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices Litig., MDL No. 1840, Civ. No. 07-MDL-1840-KHV (D. Kan.).
Dean Witter, Discover in a trial court and on appeal in class action alleging certain debts are void against public policy. Cie v. Comdata Network, Inc., 275 Ill.App.3d 759, 211 Ill.Dec. 931 (1st Dist. 1995).
Life Fitness, a division of Brunswick, at trial and on appeal in an exercise treadmill patent and unfair competition dispute. Precor Inc. v. Life Fitness, a div. of Brunswick Corp., 13 Fed.Appx. 913 (Fed. Cir. 2001). See 2000 WL 34251125, 2000 WL 34251126 (briefs) (United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit).
A telecommunications company in a case involving unfair competition and other state-law claims. Straitshot Communications, Inc. v. Telekenex, Inc., 2012 WL 727271, W.D.Wash., March 06, 2012 (NO. C10-268Z); Straitshot Communications, Inc. v. Telekenex, Inc., 2011 WL 6013829, W.D.Wash., December 01, 2011 (NO. C10-268Z); Straitshot Communications, Inc. v. Telekenex, Inc., 2011 WL 2144238, W.D.Wash., May 27, 2011 (NO. C10-268Z); Straightshot Communications, Inc. v. Telekenex, Inc., 2011 WL 1770930, W.D.Wash., May 09, 2011 (NO. C10-268Z); Straightshot Communications, Inc. v. Telekenex, Inc., 2011 WL 1770935, RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 12,046, W.D.Wash., May 09, 2011 (NO. C10-268Z); Straightshot Communications, Inc. v. Telekenex, Inc., 2011 WL 813598, W.D.Wash., March 01, 2011; Straightshot Communications Inc. v. Telekenex, Inc., 2010 WL 4793538, W.D.Wash., November 19, 2010 (NO. C10-268Z).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.