Source: https://npo.tspu.edu.ru/en/archive.html?year=2018&issue=1&article_id=6781
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 10:03:41+00:00

Document:
Ivanov V. N., Ivanov A. V.
In the conditions of increasing application by a society of means of automation in various technologies of an education system of the countries interested in intensive development, it is necessary to pay attention to expansion and deepening of teaching of robotics. It is possible to make it only entering into school educational process of the disciplines, called to train children to robotics bases. The purpose of the given work is to describe the methods of teaching of robotic software and hardware base at school. Stages of studying of the programming are described in detail, allowing the pupils easily and quickly to achieve the possibility to program the robotics that they create. The robotics element base necessary for school training is opened. The results of using author’s proposals in school education are clearly demonstrated. Examples of the devices executed at the end of school training are resulted for this purpose. The authors prove that school training to a robotics can be effective, namely deepened, general, fast, easy and thus rather not expensive and share the frame of reference on how it should be done. At first sight the problem of teaching robotics at school is intractable. However, at solving of a personnel question in teaching, and also at integrated approach observance for the purpose of achievement as well as in questions of establishment of the stages of studying the discipline, and a choice of robotic programming-element base of training a school graduate is capable to create his own robotic means.
1. Ivanov V. N., Ivanov A. V. Kontseptsiya evolyutsii sistem interneta veshchey [The concept of evolution of systems of Internet of things]. Omskiy nauchnyy vestnik – Omsk Scientifi c Bulletin, 2016, no. 5 (149), pp. 147–151 (in Russian). URL: http://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_27203412_81164986.pdf (accessed 30 May 2017).
2. Robbie B. A swiveling proxy that will even wear a tutu. New York Times, 2013, 8 June, p. A10. URL: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/08/education/for-homebound-students-a-robot-proxy-in-the-classroom.html (accessed 30 May 2017).
3. Ivanov N. G., Ivanova I. V., Alekhina G. D. Organizatsiya tekhnicheskogo tvorchestva starsheklassnikov v usloviyakh setevogo obrazovatel’nogo vzaimodeystviya [Organization of technical creativity of senior pupils in the conditions of the educational network interaction]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2016, vol. 12 (177), pp. 20–23 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_27371293_14909188.pdf (accessed 30 May 2017).
4. Zyuzina T. N., Roslova T. I. Robototekhnika v doshkol’noy obrazovatel’noy organizatsii [Robotics in pre-school educational organization]. Akademicheskiy vestnik Akademii sotsial’nogo upravleniya, 2016, no. 3 (21), pp. 41–45 (in Russian).
5. Kandlhofer M., Steinbauer G. Evaluating the impact of educational robotics on pupils’ technical- and social-skills and science related attitudes. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 2016, vol. 75, pp. 679–685. DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2015.09.007.
6. Salles A., Ais J., Semelman M., Sigman M., Calero C. I. The metacognitive abilities of children and adults. Cognitive Development, 2016, vol. 40, pp. 101–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.08.009.
7. Tocháček D., Lapeš J., Fuglík V. Developing Technological Knowledge and Programming Skills of Secondary Schools Students through the Educational Robotics Projects. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2016, vol. 217, pp. 377–381. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.107.
8. Ospennikova E., Ershov M., Iljin I. Educational Robotics as an Inovative Educational Technology. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 214, pp. 18–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.588.
9. Netesova O. S. Osobennosti prepodavaniya elektivnogo kursa “Konstruirovaniye i programmirovaniye robotov” v obshcheobrazovatel’noy shkole [Teaching the elective course “Programming and design of robots” in the school]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta – TSPU Bulletin, 2013, vol. 9 (137), pp. 175–180 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_20933710_51609017.pdf (accessed 30 May 2017).
10. Shimov I. V. Primeneniye robototekhnicheskikh ustroystv v obuchenii programmirovaniyu shkol’nikov [The use of robotic devices in the teaching of programming for schoolchildren]. Pedagogicheskoye obrazovaniye v Rossii – Pedagogical Education in Russia, 2013, no. 1, pp. 185–188 (in Russian). URL: https://elibrary.ru/download/elibrary_18883886_64322945.pdf (accessed 30 May 2017).
11. Scaradozzi D., Sorbi L., Pedale A., Valzano M., Vergine C. Teaching Robotics at the Primary School: An Innovative Approach. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2015, vol. 174, pp. 3838–3846. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.1122.
12. Candelas F. A., García G. J., Puente S., Pomares J., Jara C. A., Pérez J., Mira D., Torres F. Experiences on using Arduino for laboratory experiments of Automatic Control and Robotics. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 2015, vol. 48, Is. 29, pp. 105–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2015.11.221.
13. Sobota J., PiŜl R., Balda P., Schlegel M. Raspberry Pi and Arduino boards in control education. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 2013, vol. 46, Is. 17, pp. 7–12. DOI: 10.3182/20130828-3-UK-2039.00003.

References: V. 
 V.

 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.