Source: https://www.premierdefensegroup.com/sex-crimes-case-results/4
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 17:00:38+00:00

Document:
Case Name: Commonwealth v. G.Z.
Case Comments: Our client was gay. He was accused of groping a much bigger and stronger 17-year old athlete in the locker room of a public gym. Testimony from the prosecution’s own witnesses contradicted not only the complainant but also each other.
Case Name: State v. D.F.
Case Comments: The Complainant was a special-needs student who had been transported by our client. His lack of credibility was established when the investigation showed that he had made previous unfounded complaints against others.
Case Name: State v. B.E.
Case Comments: Defense pointed out that the charges were inconsistent with the (i) police investigation, (ii) statements made to the social worker and (iii) the grand jury presentation. Case dismissed when a detailed letter questioned prosecutorial ethics and threatened outside intervention.
Case Name: Commonwealth v. D.H.
Case Comments: The complainant was only 4 years old. The judge found her testimony unreliable and did not permit her to testify. The prosecution proceeded without the child’s testimony, attempting to rely on our client’s purported statement to the police.
Case Name: State v. T.S.
Case Name: Commonwealth v. R.Z.
Case Comments: Allegations of sexual abuse of the teenage daughter of our client’s girlfriend made when the relationship ended. Along with many photographs, defense presented testimony of independent witnesses who observed the interaction with the complainant and our client.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.