Source: https://www.willenken.com/attorneys-William-Delgado.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 04:36:41+00:00

Document:
Will Delgado Named a "Top Latino Lawyer"
Will is an experienced trial lawyer who has litigated and tried numerous cased ranging from straightforward commercial matters to complex patent cases. Currently, he focuses his practice on intellectual property and class action defense. On the intellectual property front, he has litigated in district courts, including the Eastern District of Texas and the District of Delaware, before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and before the International Trade Commission. On the class action front, he has litigated threatened or actual class actions in various federal courts across the country, including California, Texas, Illinois, Florida, New York, and New Jersey.
Will’s list of impressive victories has earned him a series of accolades from notable media outlets throughout his career, including being named a “Top 20 Lawyer Under 40,” a “Super Lawyer,” and a “Top Latino Lawyer.” True to his mantra, he has achieved “wins” for his clients in a variety of way — from picking up the phone to negotiate a pre-suit resolution to securing an appellate affirmance of a trial victory.
Having spent the majority of his legal career as a partner at Willenken, Will started out as an associate at an Am Law 100 trial firm. He speaks fluent Spanish, a skill he utilizes when representing companies from Latin America and Spain. While he used to have hobbies that included playing tennis and fly fishing, most of his free time is now consumed by coaching his two sons in various sports.
Rivas v. Physician Laboratories, Inc. et al. Lead partner in the representation of a defendant in a false advertising class action. Plaintiff voluntarily dismissed the case while a motion to dismiss was pending and after the filing of defendant’s opposition to class certification.
Eko Brands, LLC v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc. Defended California technology company ARM Enterprises, Inc. in a week-long patent trial in Seattle where client had stipulated to infringement. Plaintiff sought $4.5 million in damages but secured judgment of a mere $192,000.
Korolshteyn v. Costco Wholesale Corp. et al. Secured summary judgment in favor of retailer and dietary supplement manufacturer in a class action alleging violations of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200 and Cal. Civ. Code 1750 in connection with ginkgo supplement.
MyMedicalRecords, Inc. v. Walgreen Co. Represented Walgreen Co. in a patent infringement lawsuit in the Central District of California which settled favorably after the firm filed a request for Inter Partes Review (IPR) with the USPTO.
Reed v. NBTY et al. Secured summary judgment in favor of dietary supplement manufacturer in a class action alleging violations of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17200, Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code 17500, and Cal. Civ. Code 1750 in connection with work-out supplement.
Gossoo v. Microsoft. On behalf of Microsoft Corporation, defeated class certification in a Song-Beverly Credit Card Act class action.
Carenet USA Int'l, Inc. v. NBTY et al. Secured summary judgment in favor of dietary supplement manufacturer in breach of contract dispute in which Plaintiff alleged it had not been provided bee propolis capsules as required by the contract.
ISWest v. Milon-DiGiorgio Enterprises. On behalf of ISWest, an award-winning ISP, prevailed in a two-week jury trial before the Honorable Florence-Marie Cooper in the Central District of California in a trademark infringement dispute. Later secured affirmance on the appeal before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
Hopewell Culture & Design LLC v. VIZIO. Represented VIZIO in a patent infringement lawsuit in the Eastern District of Texas brought by a non-practicing entity. The matter was favorably resolved prior to the first scheduling conference.
Luko v. Ticketmaster. On behalf of Ticketmaster, defeated a Song-Beverly Credit Card Act class action with a motion for judgment on the pleadings.
Cahn v. Oversee.net. Defended a leading technology company from a multi-million breach of contract claim by a former employee who claimed he had been inappropriately denied bonuses. After prevailing in a first bench trial, secured favorable settlement in the midst of a second bench trial before the Honorable Steven Wilson in the Central District of California.
Lewis v. Jinon Corp. In a class action lawsuit alleging violation of the Song-Beverly Credit Card Act, filed a demurrer on behalf of Jinon which was sustained with prejudice. The trial court's opinion was later affirmed on appeal.
Otter Prods. v. AFC Trident. Represented a mobile computer accessory distributor in a patent infringement action in the District of Colorado and in a Section 337 investigation before the International Trade Commission. Both cases were settled very favorably for the firm's client.
Oversee.net v. Fareloop, LLC. Together with outside co-counsel, represented Oversee in a lawsuit against former chief engineer and other former employees for misappropriation of trade secrets. Obtained highly favorable settlement on the eve of taking first deposition in the matter.
Represented numerous retailers in connection with various copyright infringement lawsuits involving fabric designs.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.