Source: https://www.retailpatentlitigation.com/2018/07/may-2018-retail-patent-litigation-report/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 21:07:40+00:00

Document:
May saw an uptick in NPE filings. Frequent filers included Coding Technologies, CXT Systems, eCeipt, Flectere, Hawk Technology, Landmark Technology, Symbology and Tangelo IP.
Coding Technologies, LLC v. 21st Century Insurance and Financial Services, Inc. (D. Del.; M.D. Fla.; N.D. Ga.; S.D.N.Y.) (multiple cases).
Electronic Receipts Delivery Systems, LLC v. The Fresh Market, Inc. (D. Del.).
eCeipt LLC v. Academy, Ltd. d/b/a Academy Sports + Outdoors (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Recall Marketing LLC v. The Home Depot, Inc. (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Symbology Innovations LLC v. BJ’s Wholesale Club, Inc. (E.D. Del.; D. Mass.; N.D. Ill.) (multiple cases).
Tangelo IP, LLC v. Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. (D. Del.; E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Consolidated Transaction Processing LLC v. Wayfair LLC (E.D. Tex.).
Patents: 8,374,956 (Internet transactions based on user-specific information); 8,396,743 (Sending targeted product offerings based on personal information); 8,533,047 (Internet business transaction processor); 8,712,846 (Sending targeted product offerings based on personal information); and 8,775,255 (Internet business transaction processor).
Linksmart Wireless Technology, LLC v. Caesars Entertainment Corporation (D. Nev.) (multiple cases).
Judges: District Judge Miranda M. Du; Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe; Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe; District Judge Gloria M. Navarro; District Judge Richard F. Boulware, II; Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach; District Judge Kent J. Dawson; Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr.
Spider Search Analytics LLC v. Oculus360, Inc. (N.D. Tex.; D. Del.) (multiple cases).
FarmChem Corp. et al v. Landmark Technology (S.D. Iowa).
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. City of Lansing, Michigan (W.D. Mich.).
Relativity Display LLC v. Staples, Inc. (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 6,301,584 (System and method for retrieving entities and integrating data); 6,868,525 (Computer graphic display visualization system and method); and 7,801,896 (Database access system).
Liberty Access Technologies Licensing LLC v. Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. et al. (N.D. Ill.).
Patents: 9,373,205 (Access control system and method for use by an access device); and 9,911,258 (Access control system and method for use by an access device).
Flectere LLC v. Academy, Ltd. (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 6,272,506 (Computerized verification form processing system and method); 6,401,094 (System and method for presenting information in accordance with user preference); and 6,415,284 (Intelligent forms for improved automated workflow processing).
CXT Systems, Inc. v. Conn’s, Inc. (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 6,412,012 (System, method, and article of manufacture for making a compatibility-aware recommendations to a user); 6,493,703 (System and method for implementing intelligent online community message board); 7,016,875 (Single sign-on for access to a central data repository); 7,257,581 (Storage, management and distribution of consumer information); 8,260,806 (Storage, management and distribution of consumer information); 6,571,234 (System and method for managing online message board); and RE 45,661 (Online content tabulating system and method).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.