Source: http://ohiolawinfo.blogspot.com/2005_10_02_archive.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 09:58:50+00:00

Document:
2005-1622. State ex rel. Oberlin Citizens for Responsible Dev. v. Talarico.
In Mandamus. Reported at ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2005-Ohio-5061, ___ N.E.2d ___.
On motion for reconsideration. Motion denied.
2005-1862. Ameritech Publishing, Inc. v. Wilkins.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2003-V-698.
The Ohio Senate, reacting to a June U.S. Supreme Court decision (Kelo v. City of New London), voted to freeze, at least temporarily, local governments' ability to take private property for economic development purposes through eminent domain. The 29-0 vote pushed the matter (SB 167) to the House, where it is hoped it will receive prompt consideration. If enacted, the measure would impose a moratorium on such takings until lawmakers can study the issue more thoroughly.
appellant’s sentence be carried into execution on Tuesday, October 25, 2005.
required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2), shall be personal or by facsimile transmission.
possible, either personally or by facsimile transmission.
Hamilton App. No. C-040683, 161 Ohio App.3d 316, 2005-Ohio-2448.
Hamilton App. No. C-040783, 161 Ohio App.3d 316, 2005-Ohio-2448.
penalty appeal from the Court of Common Pleas of Licking County.
2005-1768. Anchor Properties, Inc. v. Ross Cty. Bd. of Elections.
2005-1684. State ex rel. Riley v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 04AP-953, 2005-Ohio-4453.
2005-1795. State ex rel. Blair v. Indus. Comm.
Franklin App. No. 04AP-1134, 2005-Ohio-4351.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2004-V-76.
2003-2168. Berea City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 2005-Ohio-4979.
Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 2003-J-143, 2003-J-144, and 2003-J-1150. Decision reversed and cause remanded.
Resnick, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, J., concur in judgment only.
2004-0261. Sandusky Dock Corp. v. Jones, 2005-Ohio-4982.
Franklin App. No. 03AP-98, 2003-Ohio-7027. Judgment affirmed.
2004-0304. Johnson v. Microsoft Corp., 2005-Ohio-4985.
Hamilton App. No. C-020564, 155 Ohio App.3d 626, 2003-Ohio-7153. Judgment affirmed.
Moyer, C.J., and Bryant, J., dissent.
Peggy Bryant, J., of the Tenth Appellate District, sitting for Pfeifer, J.
2004-0594. Athens Cty. Aud. v. Wilkins, 2005-Ohio-4986.
Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2002-A-1152. Decision affirmed.
2005-0289. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Watson, 2005-Ohio-4983.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 04-045. James E. L. Watson, Attorney Registration No. 0039585, is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for six months, stayed on conditions.
2005-0350. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Albrecht, 2005-Ohio-4984.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 04-036. Geoffrey E. Albrecht, Attorney Registration No. 0029648, is suspended from the practice of law in Ohio for one year, stayed on conditions.
THE STATE EX REL. WILLKE ET AL. v. TAFT, GOVERNOR, ET AL.
2004-R-371 Carl Smith v. William W. Wilkins, Tax Commissioner of Ohio. Sales Tax. Tax Commissioner reversed. Ms. Margulies and Mr. Dunlap concur. Mr. Eberhart dissents.
2004-K-578 S. Lavery v. Summit County Board of Revision and Summit County Auditor. Real Property Tax CAUV. Designating CAUV status. Board members concur.
2004-V-1162 Agape Hearts Ministry v. William W. Wilkins, Tax Commissioner of Ohio. Real Property Tax Exemption. Tax Commissioner affirmed. Board members concur.
2004-T-1424 Northfield Center Development v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision and the Cuyahoga County Auditor. Real Property Tax. Value found. Mr. Eberhart and Mr. Dunlap concur. Ms. Margulies dissents.
2005-V-264 Kenneth A. Cannata v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision and the Cuyahoga County Auditor. Real Property Tax. Value found. Board members concur.
2005-V-265 Kenneth A. Cannata v. Cuyahoga County Board of Revision and the Cuyahoga County Auditor. Real Property Tax. Value found. Board members concur.
A federal appeals court Monday agreed to let two major provisions of a 1998 abortion regulation law go into effect while the panel reviews a lower court decision that found the measure constitutional.
The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected a motion from Cincinnati Women's Services to delay implementation of the measure (HB421, 122nd General Assembly).
Attorney General Jim Petro said the appellate action would allow two components of the law to take effect at 5 p.m. Oct. 10. Click here for a statement from the AG's Office.
This latest release offers six pages of information concerning attorney disciplinary cases.
IT IS ORDERED by the court that the motion is granted. Counsel for appellee Michael Hill shall file a memorandum in response within thirty days of the date of this entry.
Hamilton App. No. C-040683, 161 Ohio App.3d 316, 2005-Ohio-2448. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the court hereby accepts the appeal.
161 Ohio App.3d 316, 2005-Ohio-2448.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that an expedited briefing schedule be set as follows: Appellants' merit brief shall be due within 20 days from the date the court of appeals' record is filed with the Clerk of this court; appellees' merit briefs shall be due within 20 days of the filing of appellants' merit brief; and appellants' reply brief shall be due within 10 days of the filing of appellees' merit briefs. No extensions of time shall be permitted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall combine the briefing of this case with 2005-1211, Norwood v. Horney, and file one brief for each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI; the parties shall file an original of the brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief; and the parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.
The Clerk shall issue an order for the transmittal of the record from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County.
O'Connor, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV only. Resnick, J., not participating.
Hamilton App. No. C-040783. Upon consideration of the jurisdictional memoranda filed in this case, the court hereby accepts the appeal.
appellees' merit briefs shall be due within 20 days of the filing of appellants' merit brief; and appellants' reply brief shall be due within 10 days of the filing of appellees' merit briefs. No extensions of time shall be permitted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall combine the briefing of this case with 2005-1210, Norwood v. Horney, and file one brief for each permitted under S.Ct.Prac.R. VI; the parties shall file an original of the brief in each case and 18 copies of the brief; and the parties shall otherwise comply with the requirements of S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.
O'Connor, J., would accept the appeal on Proposition of Law No. IV only.
2005-1737. State ex rel. Rust v. Lucas Cty. Bd. of Elections.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed.
2005-1104. State ex rel. Bartley v. Fahey Banking Co.
Franklin App. No. 04AP-825, 2005-Ohio-2805.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.