Source: https://dnattorney.com/dn-resources/sportspharma-v-inetsources/
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 20:30:57+00:00

Document:
Complainant owns the mark Sportpharma, and uses the website sportpharma.com to sell nutritional supplements on the Internet. Respondent registered the domain name sportspharma.com. This site redirected users to another site which also sells nutritional supplements.
Respondents mark is confusingly similar to the mark to which Complainant has rights. Respondent has attempted to create confusion as to the location of Respondents website and the affiliation of the products advertised on Respondents site.
Respondent is not commonly known by the name, and instead is using the name to offer services which are in competition with Complainant. It is clear that Respondent seeks to profit from the registration. Thus, Respondent has no rights to the name.
Respondent was aware of the confusion that would result between the two sites. This awareness and the intention to attract Internet users to a third partys site for profit infers bad faith.
America Online, Inc. v. Avrasya Yayincilik Danismanlik Ltd., FA93679 (Nat. Arb. Forum March 15, 2000).
Cunard Line Ltd. v. Champion Travel, Inc., FA92053 (Nat. Arb. Forum Mar. 7, 2000).
Hewlett-Packard Company v. Full System, FA94637 (Nat. Arb. Forum May 22, 2000).
Mariah Boats, Inc. v. Shoreline Marina, FA94392 (Nat. Arb. Forum May 5, 2000).
Respondents registration as technical, administrative and billing contacts by email.
5/16/1994; registered 08/15/1995; No. 1,911,037) for nutritional supplements.
The Respondent registered the website <sportspharma.com> on 09/23/2000.
supplements manufactured by the Complainant.
Complainant has rights in the mark SPORTSPHARMA.COM.
The Respondents mark is confusingly similar to the Complainants mark.
Complainants domain name, <americaonline.com>, were confusingly similar).
The name does not reflect a name by which the Respondent is commonly known.
registered and well-known mark to offer competing services.
4(c)(I), (iii). See Cunard Line Ltd. v. Champion Travel, Inc., FA 92053 (Nat.
interests in the domain name <cunardcruise.com>).
interests in the domain name.
and business would be disrupted as a result of the Respondents infringing website.
Policy 4(b)(iii). See Mariah Boats, Inc. v. Shoreline Marina, FA 94392 (Nat.
Arb. Forum May 5, 2000).
using the domain name in bad faith.
the decision of the panel that the requested relief be granted.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.