Source: https://law.jrank.org/pages/13464/Huron-Portland-Cement-Co-v-City-Detroit.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 20:16:15+00:00

Document:
Significance, Hand-fired Boilers And Coal Smoke, Regulating Interstate Commerce, "at War With The Federal License"
That the city of Detroit had no right to enforce a local anti-pollution ordinance against ships owned by the Huron Portland Cement Company, given that those ships had been "inspected, approved and licensed" by the Federal Government for interstate commerce; moreover, even if Detroit's law was not in conflict with federal law, enforcement of the statute was an unreasonable restraint of interstate commerce.
That the Detroit anti-smoke ordinance was constitutional, even when applied to ships licensed by the federal government, and that the criminal provisions of the Detroit law did not impose "an undue burden" on interstate commerce.
South Carolina State Highway Department v. Barnwell, 303 U.S. 177 (1938).
Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona ex rel. Sullivan, 325 U.S. 761 (1945).
Bibb v. Navajo Freight Lines Inc., 359 U.S. 520 (1959).
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Ad. Comm., 432 U.S. 333 (1977).
Kassell v. Consolidated Freightways Corp., 450 U.S. 662 (1981).
Davies, J. Clarence, and Jan Mazurek. Pollution Control in the United States: Evaluating the System. Resources for the Future, 1998.
Toh, Kevin G. "Are Credit-Card Late Fees `Interest'?" Michigan Law Review, March 1996, p. 1294.
Huron Portland Cement Co. v. City of Detroit - "at War With The Federal License"

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.