Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Text=CE:ECHR:2003:0306JUD004151098
Timestamp: 2019-06-16 11:56:07+00:00

Document:
EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 41510/98 - dejure.org
EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 41510/98
https://dejure.org/2003,34540
EGMR, 06.03.2003 - 41510/98 (https://dejure.org/2003,34540)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06.03.2003 - 41510/98 (https://dejure.org/2003,34540)
EGMR, Entscheidung vom 06. März 2003 - 41510/98 (https://dejure.org/2003,34540)
Tipp: Um den Kurzlink (hier: https://dejure.org/2003,34540) schnell in die Zwischenablage zu kopieren, können Sie die Tastenkombination Alt + R verwenden - auch ohne diesen Bereich zu öffnen.
Art. 6, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 14+P1 Abs. 1, Art. 14, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1, Protokoll Nr. 1 Art. 1 Abs. 1, Art. 41, Art. 35, Art. 35 Abs. 3 MRK
Violation of Art. 6-1 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 Violation of P1-1 as regards non-execution No violation of P1-1 as regards other complaints (englisch)
EGMR, 24.10.2000 - 41510/98
La Cour rappelle que l'exécution d'un jugement ou arrêt, de quelque juridiction que ce soit, doit être considérée comme faisant partie intégrante du procès au sens de l'article 6 (voir, mutatis mutandis, Hornsby, précité, pp. 510-511, § 40 ; Bourdov c. Russie, no 59498/00, §§ 34 et 35, CEDH 2002-III ; JasiÅ«niene c. Lituanie, no 41510/98, § 27, 6 mars 2003).
Accordingly, the execution of a judicial decision cannot be prevented, invalidated or unduly delayed (see, among other authorities, Hornsby v. Greece, judgment of 19 March 1997, Reports 1997-II, pp. 510-11, § 40; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 34, ECHR 2002-III; JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, § 27, 6 March 2003; and Ruianu, cited above, § 65).
I acknowledge that the majority's arguments in finding a violation of Article 6 § 1 - based, in particular, on the lack of police assistance in the enforcement procedure - are sound and do not in any way conflict with our Court's case-law (see, among other authorities, Hornsby v. Greece, judgment of 19 March 1997, Reports of Judgments and Decisions 1997-II, pp. 510-11, § 40; Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 34, ECHR 2002-III; Ruianu v. Romania, no. 34647/97, § 65, 17 June 2003; and JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, § 27, 6 March 2003).
EGMR, 29.06.2004 - 18966/02
The Court recalls its case-law that the impossibility for an applicant to obtain the execution of a judgment in his or her favour constitutes an interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions, as set out in the first sentence of the first paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, among other authorities, Burdov v. Russia, no. 59498/00, § 40, ECHR 2002-III; JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, § 45, 6 March 2003).
Exiger de lui qu'il fasse encore d'autres démarches dont le résultat ne serait que répétitif, à savoir que le tribunal demande encore une fois à l'autorité administrative compétente d'exécuter une décision de justice définitive, serait trop onéreux et ne correspondrait pas à l'exigence de l'article 35 § 1 de la Convention (voir, mutatis mutandis, JasiÅ«niene c. Lituanie, no 41510/98, la décision du 24 octobre 2000 et l'arrêt du 6 mars 2003, § 30).
The Court reiterates its case-law to the effect that the impossibility for an applicant to obtain the execution of a judgment making an award in his or her favour constitutes an interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions, as set out in the first sentence of the first paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, among other judgments, Burdov, cited above, § 40, and JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, § 45, 6 March 2003).
The Court further reiterates its case-law to the effect that the impossibility for an applicant to obtain the execution of a judgment making an award in his or her favour constitutes an interference with the right to the peaceful enjoyment of possessions, as set out in the first sentence of the first paragraph of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see, among other authorities, Burdov, cited above, § 40, and JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania, no. 41510/98, § 45, 6 March 2003).
The Court considers that in the present case recourse to the bailiff service would only have produced the same result and could not be said to have constituted an effective remedy against non-enforcement (cf. Yavorivskaya v. Russia (dec.), no. 34687/02, 15 May 2004, and JasiÅ«niene v. Lithuania (dec.), no. 41510/98, 24 October 2000).
En conséquence, l'exécution d'une décision judiciaire ne peut être empêchée, invalidée ou retardée de manière excessive (voir, entre autres, Pini et autres, précité, § 176 ; Hornsby c. Grèce, arrêt du 19 mars 1997, Recueil 1997-II, pp. 510 et suiv., § 40 ; Bourdov c. Russie, no 59498/00, § 34, CEDH 2002-III ; JasiÅ«niene c. Lituanie, no 41510/98, § 27, 6 mars 2003 ; Ruianu c. Roumanie, no 34647/97, § 65, 17 juin 2003).
EGMR, 20.07.2004 - 60750/00
EGMR, 20.10.2011 - 29979/04
EGMR, 06.03.2007 - 14425/03
KALPOKAS AND KALPOKAS v. LITHUANIA
EGMR, 03.02.2011 - 39941/07
EGMR, 05.04.2005 - 58928/00
KATSYUK c. UKRAINE
EGMR, 01.04.2008 - 16947/03
TACULESCU ET AUTRES c. ROUMANIE
EGMR, 12.10.2006 - 1486/02
EGMR, 22.11.2005 - 5596/03
EGMR, 26.04.2006 - 3955/04
EGMR, 22.11.2007 - 29875/02
ZAICHENKO v. UKRAINE
EGMR, 22.02.2007 - 18037/02
GAVRILEANU c. ROUMANIE
EGMR, 26.07.2005 - 15366/03
EGMR, 02.10.2003 - 54268/00
EGMR, 14.10.2010 - 35507/07
EGMR, 27.05.2010 - 25051/02
EGMR, 12.04.2007 - 24842/04
KLETSOVA v. RUSSIA
EGMR, 28.02.2006 - 21324/02
EGMR, 13.12.2005 - 63767/00
EGMR, 29.11.2005 - 18378/03
EGMR, 07.04.2005 - 62988/00
EGMR, 05.10.2010 - 2768/04
KOLEVA c. BULGARIE
EGMR, 12.01.2010 - 44307/05
MANOFESCU c. ROUMANIE
EGMR, 10.12.2009 - 31387/05
EGMR, 15.10.2009 - 28070/04
GVOZDETSKIY v. UKRAINE
EGMR, 08.01.2009 - 25803/05
SINICIC v. CROATIA
EGMR, 03.10.2006 - 40333/02
RAYNAUD ET BRUNET c. FRANCE
EGMR, 29.11.2005 - 17015/03
EGMR, 29.11.2005 - 41030/02
EGMR, 04.10.2005 - 20473/02
EGMR, 03.05.2005 - 26131/02
EGMR, 03.05.2005 - 35282/02
EGMR, 27.05.2004 - 63501/00
EGMR, 08.01.2004 - 62988/00

References: Art. 6
 Art. 6
 Art. 13
 Art. 14
 Art. 14
 Art. 1
 Art. 1
 Art. 41
 Art. 35
 Art. 35
 Art. 6
 Art. 13
 l'article 6
 § 40
 § 27
 § 40
 § 34
 § 27
 § 65
 § 1
 § 40
 § 34
 § 65
 § 27
 § 40
 § 45
 l'article 35
 § 1
 § 30
 § 40
 § 45
 § 40
 § 45
 § 176
 § 40
 § 34
 § 27
 § 65