Source: https://de.scribd.com/document/394783704/Jerome-Corsi-files-complaint-against-Mueller
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 07:24:30+00:00

Document:
PROSECUTING ATTORNEYS IN THE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION OF DR.
formerly a U.S. Senate candidate in the State of Florida in 2004. Given his background, Mr.
DOJ just as Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the prosecutors specifically hired by Mr.
Jeannie S. Rhee, (b) Andrew D. Goldstein, (c) Aaron S.J. Zelinsky, and (d) L. Rush Atkinson.
investigative journalist, whose activities are protected by the First Amendment to the U.S.
presidential campaign, among other false testimony.
prosecution without the relief demanded.
outlets. Some of these books were New York Times Bestsellers.
but deleted nearly 32,000 others.
be a high priority for spy agencies.
and Roger Stone of supposedly acquiring in August 2016.
Patrick Lawrence, "A New Report Raises Big Questions About Last Year’s DNC Hack,"
source to learn more details about his widely-announced plans came far too late.
especially violated all of Rule 3:8.
violated Rules, whose violations should be obvious from the facts cited herein.
Investigation’s (“FBI”) building in Southeast Washington, D.C.
who supervises line attorneys and prosecutors.
Trump (or his campaign) and for leniency in punishment upon pleading guilty to one single count.
See also Exhibits F, G.
Exhibit C shows that the lead prosecutor encharged with the criminal investigation of Dr.
(d) L. Rush Atkinson, V of Special Counsel Mueller’s office.
Hillary Clinton and Bill Clinton, including in a lawsuit brought by undersigned counsel Mr.
2015 on appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
as they wished without committing perjury in testifying as the Special Counsel’s office demanded.
staff counseled and attemted to coerce Dr. Corsi to commit a felony, all in their zeal to get Dr.
limited to the President of the United States, Donald J. Trump.
desired would be false. This is criminal.
Assange.” He then correctly and honestly amended his answers, as he said he would do.
Now, the Special Counsel’s office is knowingly and deceitfully threatening to charge Dr.
grand jurors to further his corrupt scheme.
Counsel Mueller’s office has had over 9,000 pages of written contacts with the news media.
any written record of the leaks. This needs to be investigated and potentially prosecuted.
sought to conceal its purpose.
has enlisted the help of agents from the IRS’ Criminal Investigations unit.
Clinton’s emails from Russian hackers, according to people familiar with the matter.
window into Trump's thinking shortly before he fired Comey.
New York grand jury activities were promptly leaked to the news media.
transactions, according to several people familiar with the matter.
financial crimes, including potential money laundering.
indicating that they were not the source of the leaks.
advised those persons of their obligation of secrecy under this rule.
under Rule 6, may be punished as a contempt of court.
through additional links and contacts) between the 2015-2016 presidential campaign of Donald J.
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.
was the object of the conspiracy.
shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege.
2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both.
informed would be false testimony.
Resource Manual, 1752 Subornation of Perjury.
U.S.C. § 2(b). United States v. Walser, 3 F.3d 380, 388 (11th Cir. 1993).
States v. Heater, 63 F.3d 311, 320 (4th Cir. 1995), cert. denied, 116 S. Ct. 796 (1996).
wanted to get from Dr. Corsi in court proceedings and indictments against other persons.
penalties on fines and restitution not timely made.
imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
Edition, May 2016, page 2.
material facts tending substantially to negate the existence of probable cause.
indict Dr. Corsi for a charge that they know is not even supported by probable cause.
prima facie showing of guilt by Dr. Corsi.
ambiguous documents and events, exculpatory evidence, and actual guilt by other persons.
known to be false but was obtained by coercion. Thus, as part of the requested investigation, Dr.
the recepients of this Complaint.
similar in most or all states following the ABA Model Rules.
General shall notify Congress as specified in § 600.9(a)(3).
the approval of the Attorney General.
reason for his or her removal.
other attorneys in that State.
Justice to assure compliance with this section.
counsel, appointed under chapter 40.
and 28 CFR part 45.
immoral, or disgraceful conduct, or other conduct prejudicial to the government.” 5 CFR735.203.
would be directly affected by the outcome.
Democrat party investigating the presidential campaign of a Republican President, Donald Trump.
fill the demand provided by the Clinton campaign’s $12 million expenditure.
decision-making body the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”), Mr.
Mueller and his team would be ethically prohibited from honestly exploring the truth.
Trump in retaliation for his friend, Mr. Comey, and his firing from head of the FBI.
also been implicated in illegal prosecutions of the past, involving the infamous Enron scandal.
accepting conviction for a felony count of perjury, yet keep the entire arrangement secret. Dr.
Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) regulations, because Dr. Corsi holds a securities license.
of Special Counsel Mueller’s office.
substantially to negate the existence of probable cause.
to obtain an advantage in a civil matter.
legal rights of such a person.
disclosure is prohibited by Rule 1.6.
false testimony from Dr. Corsi to prosecute others when there is no basis in and fact.
grand jury and the public that they know to be false, present false claims and statements against Dr.
basis to do so, and fail to amend, as promised, statements previously made by Dr. Corsi.
lawyer reasonably believes is false.
President of the United States, elected and empowered by the voters pursuant to the U.S.
maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.
be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
The Special Counsel and his prosecutorial staff of the DOJ by threatening to prosecute Dr.
some of the very criminal offenses that they are investigating and charging others with.
as set forth herein of the Special Counsel and his prosecutorial staff.
of Columbia Bar Disciplinary Counsel to further this Complaint and the ensuing investigations.
continuing and causing irreparable harm.
Dr. Corsi does not want the injustice inflicted upon him to be inflicted upon anyone else.
authorities, federal state and state, for criminal prosecution.
actions also need to be investigated and remedied.
Clinton’s chances of winning the presidency.
government provided the hacked data to WikiLeaks in order to help Donald J.
Mr. Assange’s battles with the Obama administration.
saw her as a personal foe.
Mrs. Clinton would wield power in two ways he found problematic.
(The cables, along with archives of military documents, were leaked by Pvt.
including The New York Times. Despite a criminal investigation into Mr.
collapse into anarchy, enabling the Islamic State to ﬂourish.
going to proceed” with that approach if elected president, he said.
WikiLeaks and its news media partners began publishing the cables, Mrs.
at the fabric of the proper function of responsible government,” she said then.
WikiLeaks had obtained still-undisclosed emails from the private server Mrs.
prosecuted for publishing leaked documents.
revelations in the emails that party ofﬁcials had privately rooted for Mrs.
might have been hacked on multiple occasions by different intruders.
defendant, JEROME CORSI, stipulate and agree that the following facts are true and accurate.
offense to which he is pleading guilty.
and the Russian government or Organization 1.
investigators was a violation of federal law. CORSI said that he understood.
Organization 1 might do with those materials.
planned to release damaging information in October 2016.
Embassy in London and get the pending [Organization 1] emails . . .
CORSI forwarded Person 1’s email to the overseas individual.
c. On or about August 2, 2016, CORSI responded to Person 1 by email.
of that email to the overseas individual.
confidential information from Organization 1, were false.
I have read every word of this Statement of the Offense, or have had it read to me.
forms are available on the Internet at www.ca11.uscourts.gov.
Klayman vs. Clinton, et al.
! Check here if you are lead counsel.
court within 14 days of any changes in the status of my state bar memberships. See 11th Cir. R. 46-7.
Washington, DC 20006 725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Criminal No.
Office and to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(2).
obligation to pay any applicable interest or penalties on fines and restitution not timely made.
costs of any imprisonment, term of supervised release, and period of probation.
the option of this Office.
of evidence, along with this Agreement.
investigations in connection with the conduct described in the Statement of Offense.
The Government agrees that a 2-level reduction will be appropriate, pursuant to U.S.S.G.
this Agreement, and conduct between entry of the plea and imposition of sentence.
Agreement, or (c) taken any other action inconsistent with acceptance of responsibility.
In accordance with the above, the applicable Guidelines Offense Level will be at least 4.
Probation Office, your client’s criminal history points may increase.
plea on that basis, and the Government and your client will still be bound by this Agreement.
based on that post-agreement conduct.
would constitute a reasonable sentence in light of all of the factors set forth in 18 U.S.C.
including any misconduct not described in the charges to which your client is pleading guilty.
that the Court will have the benefit of all relevant information before a sentence is imposed.
sentencing issue, the parties reserve the right to full allocution in any post-sentence litigation.
understands that the sentence to be imposed is a matter solely within the discretion of the Court.
recommendation nor the Sentencing Guidelines are binding on the Court.
and does not, make any promise or representation as to what sentence your client will receive.
Your client waives any challenge to venue in the District of Columbia.
Offense that is not time-barred on the date that this Agreement is signed.
found guilty after a trial, your client would have the right to appeal your client’s conviction.
withdraws from this Agreement after signing it.
date for sentencing will be set by the Court.
waiver, your client is aware that your client’s sentence has yet to be determined by the Court.
noted above, in exchange for the concessions made by the Government in this Agreement.
assistance of counsel. Your client reserves the right to file a motion brought under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2), but agrees to waive the right to appeal the denial of such a motion.
or the Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, for the duration of the Office’s investigation.
Government and your client agree that mandatory restitution does not apply in this case.
only by probable cause in order to establish a breach of this Agreement.
such a breach, your client will not be allowed to withdraw your client’s guilty plea.
made unless committed to writing and signed by your client, defense counsel, and the Office.
The proffer agreement is superseded as noticed herein if the Agreement is breached.
administrative claim pending or that may be made against your client.
with this Agreement and matters related to it.
guilty as set forth in this Agreement.

References: § 2
 v. 
 v. 
 § 600
 § 1001

§ 3582
 § 552