Source: https://www.pacode.com/secure/data/034/chapter131/s131.112.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 02:17:06+00:00

Document:
034 Pa. Code § 131.112. Correction or amendment of decision.
§ 131.112. Correction or amendment of decision.
(a) A decision or an order of a judge may be amended or corrected by the judge subsequent to the service of notice of the decision and order. A typographical or clerical error or obvious omission or error on the part of the judge may be corrected on the judges motion or on the motion of one or both parties. Other amendments or corrections will be made only upon written agreement of the parties. A request for correction or amendment shall be made within 20 days of the date of service of notice of the decision and order.
(c) Neither the request for correction nor the corrected decision and order will extend the appeal period of the original decision and order as to any part of that decision and order which is not the subject of the request for correction or amendment.
(d) Subsections (a)(c) supersede 1 Pa. Code § § 31.13, 31.14, 35.54, 35.55, 35.190 and 35.21135.214 and also supersede 1 Pa. Code Chapter 35, Subchapter D.
The provisions of this § 131.112 amended under sections 401.1 and 435(a) and (c) of the Workers Compensation Act (77 P.S. § § 710 and 991(a) and (c)); section 2205 of The Administrative Code of 1929 (71 P.S. § 565); and section 414 of The Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act (77 P.S. § 1514).
The provisions of this § 131.112 adopted March 29, 1991, effective March 30, 1991, 21 Pa.B. 1401; amended December 6, 2002, effective December 7, 2002, 32 Pa.B. 6043. Immediately preceding text appears at serial pages (286285) to (286286).
Because a bench order is not a decision as required by § 131.112, that section is not applicable. Strawbridge & Clothier v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board, 777 A.2d 1194 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001).
It would be utterly impracticable to deny a Workers Compensation Judge the authority to vacate his decision without the written agreement of the parties if he realizes that a decision has been issued erroneously. Edward Floria v. Workers Compensation Appeal Board (General Electric), 11 PAWCLR (LRP) 2102.

References: § 131

§ 131
 § 31
 § 131
 § 710
 § 565
 § 1514
 § 131
 § 131
 v. 
 v.