Source: http://ohiolawinfo.blogspot.com/2006_04_16_archive.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 09:58:20+00:00

Document:
2005-1966. In re A. B., J. B., T. B., and C.B.
rights or adoption from the Court of Appeals for Summit County.
pending before the court as a death penalty postconviction case.
2004-1186. State v. Olson, 2006-Ohio-1704.
Stark App. No. 2003CA00371, 2004-Ohio-2965. Judgment reversed.
2004-1187. State v. Glosser, 2006-Ohio-1705.
Stark App. No. 2003CA00374, 2004-Ohio-2966. Judgment reversed.
2004-1188 and 2004-1688. State v. Cantwell, 2006-Ohio-1706.
Stark App. No. 2003CA00367, 2004-Ohio-2964. Judgment reversed.
2004-1239. Coleman v. Dogra, 2006-Ohio-1707.
Cuyahoga App. No. 83522, 157 Ohio App.3d 530, 2004-Ohio-3109. Judgment affirmed.
2004-1274 and 2004-1689. State v. Massey, 2006-Ohio-1708.
Stark App. No. 2003CA00373, 2004-Ohio-3257. Judgment reversed.
2004-1275 and 2004-1697. State v. Owens, 2006-Ohio-1709.
Stark App. No. 2003CA00370, 2004-Ohio-3262. Judgment reversed.
2004-1320 and 2004-1699. State v. Williams, 2006-Ohio-1710.
Stark App. No. 2003CA00369, 2004-Ohio-3525. Judgment reversed.
2004-1324 and 2004-1692. State v. Carter, 2006-Ohio-1711.
Stark App. No. 2003CA00372, 2004-Ohio-3523. Judgment reversed.
2005-0272. Fowee v. Wesley Hall, Inc., 2006-Ohio-1712.
Hamilton App. No. C-040188, 2004-Ohio-7002. Judgment reversed.
Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
Resnick and O'Donnell, JJ., concur in judgment only.
2005-0311. State Auto. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Titanium Metals Corp., 2006-Ohio-1713.
Cuyahoga App. No. 83540, 159 Ohio App.3d 338, 2004-Ohio-6618. Judgment vacated and cause remanded. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
2005-0428. State v. Durham , 2006-Ohio-1714.
Cuyahoga App. No. 84132, 2005-Ohio-202. Sua sponte, cause dismissed as having been improvidently accepted. Moyer, C.J., Resnick, Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O'Connor, O'Donnell and Lanzinger, JJ., concur.
2005-2029. Columbus Bar Assn. v. Harris, 2006-Ohio-1715.
On Certified Report by the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline, No. 04-075. Cynthia June Harris, Attorney Registration No. 0059755, is indefinitely suspended from the practice of law in Ohio.
The Supreme Court of Ohio's Advisory Committee on Technology and the Courts has announced that the Electronic Filing Work Group of the Standards Subcommittee has released a draft of their proposed e-filing standards for comment. Comments will be accepted on the document through June 30, 2006.
SYLLABUS: A probate judge may teach a six hour course on the topic of adult protective services at a training program for employees of county departments of job and family services, provided the activity does not interfere with the performance of judicial duties, but the probate judge should not accept compensation. Compensation for such activity is prohibited under both the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct and Ohio Ethics Law. Compensation to the probate judge from the state department of job and family services does not uphold the integrity, independence, and impartiality of the judiciary as required under Canons 1 and 2 of the Ohio Code of Judicial Conduct and would be an honorarium, improper compensation, and an unlawful interest in a public contract under Ohio Ethics Law. Prospective application of this opinion is recommended.
SYLLABUS: In announcing the opening of a law practice, an attorney may send an announcement card and a biography to members of the bar, business entities, and others. If the attorney wishes to announce the opening of a law practice by sending a personalized letter and a biography to fellow members of the bar, the letter is not subject to the requirements for direct mail solicitation in DR 2-101(F)(2). But, if an attorney wishes to announce the opening of a law practice by sending a personalized letter and a biography to business entities or others that might need legal services in the areas of law in which the attorney will practice, the letter is subject to the requirements for direct mail solicitation in DR 2-101(F)(2).
2005-0945. Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.
case with 2006-0646, Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util.
No. 04-1645-EL-AAM, 2006-0536, Ohio Consumers' Counsel v.
2006-0536. Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.
cause be consolidated with 2006-0600, Ohio Consumers' Counsel v.
2006-0600. Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.
ause be consolidated with 2006-0536, Ohio Consumers' Counsel v.
2006-0646. Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util. Comm.
this case with 2005-0945, Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Pub. Util.
2005-1461. Ohio Govt. Risk Mgt. Plan v. Harrison.
Auglaize App. Nos. 2-04-37 and 2-04-38, 161 Ohio App.
Court of Appeals forAuglaize County.
App. No. C-030905, 158 Ohio App.3d 576, 2004-Ohio-4664.
in accordance with S.Ct.Prac.R. VI.
court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Lucas County.
2006-0559. State ex rel. Basile v. Dublin Suites, Inc.
Franklin App. No. 05AP-464, 2006-Ohio-1029.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.