Source: http://en.nbpublish.com/e_arch/
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 22:04:15+00:00

Document:
Output information "Architecture and design"
Review: The subject of this research is a city, which has become an integral part of everyday life, but at the same time imposes demands on the environment. Multiple researchers attempt to create a favorable image of cities of the future; however, the main challenge is so that human comfort would not harm the environment. The basic need of a modern man is the pursuit of environmental friendliness, which found reflection in the works of sociologists, philosophers, and urban planners. The concepts of E. Howard remained just a utopia, but city of the future can only be "green”. The article applies the comparative analysis, situational analysis, structuring of new concepts on the basis of the Russian and foreign sources. Urban civilization will continue to be the heart of human life. The smart technologies and interaction with biosphere will become the key components of cities of the future. It implies the use of renewable energy, advancement of public electric transport, creation of cyclist-friendly environment. The South Korea’s smartest city Songdo is chosen as a probable prototype.
Ragon M. La cite de l’an 2000. Paris: Casterman, 1968. 189 p.
Maslov V.M. Postchelovecheskie trendy tekhnogennoy tsivilizatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2014. - 6. - C. 804 - 813. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.6.11953.
Dolgikh E.I., Antonov E.V., Borushkina S.M. Smart Cities: podkhody i tekhnologii // Urbanistika i rynok nedvizhimosti. - 2015. - 1. - C. 42 - 49. DOI: 10.7256/2313-0539.2014.3.12545.
Ragon M. Goroda budushchego / per. s frantsuzskogo. M.: «Mir», 1969. 294 s.
Yarosh N.N. Gorodskoe khozyaystvo: ot «goroda Solntsa» k umnomu gorodu // Ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. 2013. T. 30. № 2. S. 72-88.
Pelegrin-Genel E. Une autre ville sinon rien. Paris: Decouverte, 2012. 215 p.
Review: Despite the rapid development of research on folded morphogenesis over the few recent decades worldwide, the systematization of research methods is currently of great interest. The choice of research method directly depends in the set objective; at the same time, choice of improper method fails to demonstrate results. The study of folded morphogenesis has a number of specific features, among which is the impossibility of using classical principles, peculiarity of visual perception, incompleteness of the development process, etc. This article analyzes the method of conceptual constructs, on-site survey, comparative analysis, sociological survey, historical analysis, economic analysis, and research modeling. The goal lies in identification of advantages and disadvantages of the selected methods, their systematization and application evaluation in further research activities. It is assumed that this work will help choosing a proper method or a combination of methods. The results demonstrate that the majority of modern scholars confine themselves to using only the method of conceptual constructs, which is clearly insufficient for full implementation of the folded forms into the architecture. This author determines the following possible combinations of methods: the method of conceptual constructs and on-site surveys, method of comparative analysis and sociological survey, method of on-site survey and comparative analysis.
Vil'kovskiy M. B. Sotsiologiya arkhitektury. M: Fond «Russkiy avangard», 2010. 592 s.
Fischer J., Delitz H. Die Architektur der Gesellschaft. Theorien für die Architektursoziologie. Bielefeld, 2009. R. 9.
Pomorov S. B., Udodenko A. A. Problema vzaimodeystviya arkhitektury i sotsiologii kak sredstva modelirovaniya gradostroitel'nykh sistem i ikh elementov // Polzunovskiy vestnik. 2013. № 4. S. 219-221.
Terebov D. N., Lazarev D. N., Zorin D. V. Obsledovanie zdaniy i sooruzheniy // Innovatsionnaya nauka. 2016. № 4. S. 174-176.
Musatov A. A. Metodika arkhitekturnogo analiza. Ukazaniya po vypolneniyu prakticheskoy raboty po kursu istorii arkhitektury. M.: Moskovskiy arkhitekturnyy institut, 2015. 56 c.
Pirogov S. V. Gorizonty issledovaniy vizual'nogo // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta.
Review: The subject of this article is examination of the question of interrelation between the objects of modern architecture and architecture of the previous eras within a uniform environment. The object of this article is the range of publications, mostly of the Russian scholars, as result of comprehension of the topic at hand. At the same time the author examines primarily the foreign practical experience. Particular attention is paid to a variety of problems pertinent to topic "old and new in the architecture of modern city", which is a focus of research of modern scholars. The problems of synthesis of the modern and historical architecture in uniform space are analyzed. The conclusion is made that modern researchers prefer to concentrate on the particular buildings or residential quarters, paying insufficient attention to the problem and methods of its solution in broader methodological perspective. The nolety consists in scientific actualization of the problem of integration of modern and historical architecture, determination of the urgent unexplored questions of integration of the “new” and “old” with regards to residential development in the historical environment or city-planning reconstruction.
Linch K. Obraz goroda /per. s angl.: V. L. Glazychev. M.: Stroyizdat, 1982. 328 s.
Azatyan K. R., Engoyan A. R. Problemy integratsii starogo i novogo v protsesse razvitiya gorodskogo prostranstva // Vestnik MGSU. 2014. №6. S. 7.
Agisheva S. T. Mubarashkina F. D. Problemy razvitiya sovremennoy arkhitektury v istoricheski slozhivsheysya srede goroda // Izvestiya kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo arkhitekturno-stroitel'nogo universiteta. 2013. №4 (26). S. 7-15.
Zhilyaeva N. V. Problemy sokhraneniya istoricheskoy sredy v strukture sovremennoy zastroyke gorodov // Obrazovanie, nauka, proizvodstvo. Belgorodskiy gosudarstvennyy tekhnologicheskiy universitet im. V. G. Shukhova. 2015. S. 2044-2049.
Korotich M. A., Korotich A. V. Traditsionnye i sovremennye formy v arkhitekture: problema vzaimodeystviya // Akademicheskiy vestnik Uralniiproekt RAASN. 2010. № 2. S. 58-60.
Lapshina E. G. Glavnyy dom goroda: mezhdu proshlym i budushchim // Academia. Arkhitektura i stroitel'stvo. 2009. № 2. S. 44.
Review: The subject of this research is the experience of introducing installations as a result of interdisciplinary interaction in the area of design education. Research is conducted on the internal ties between various subjects of the course, which play an important role in forming relevant artistic language and organization of consciences of future designers. An attempt is made to analyze and determine the areas of influence of various disciplines, as well as structuring of methodology of development of holistic image of installation as the means of synthesis of various disciplines into a single design product. The scientific novelty consists in comprehension of installation in the context of the educational process as an intersection point of various art and science. The result of this process became the synthesized creative approach, which crosses the boundaries of traditional tasks in an attempt to change the perception of the educational process into a more expressive and relevant forms of art.
Berezina M. A., Zhushchikhovskaya I. S. Novyy podkhod k sozdaniyu installyatsiy // Novye idei novogo veka: materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii FAD TOGU. 2014. T. 3. S. 10–14.
Mazheykina G. G. Installyatsii XXI veka – ot zamysla k voploshcheniyu na primerakh sovremennogo iskusstva v Rossii i stranakh SNG // Iskusstvo Evrazii. 2018. №2(9). S. 154–163.
Karpova M. V. Installyatsiya kak rezul'tat integratsionnykh techeniy v obrazovatel'nom protsesse // Innovatsii v dizayne i dizayn-obrazovanii / Rossiyskiy gosudarstvennyy professional'no-pedagogicheskiy universitet. Ekaterinburg, 2017. S. 68–75.
Sevost'yanova Yu. Yu. Installyatsiya: novaya real'nost' // Materialy studencheskoy konferentsii «Mnogolikoe iskusstvo rubezha tysyacheletiy» / Rostovskaya gosudarstvennaya konservatoriya (akademiya) im. S. V. Rakhmaninova, g. Rostov-na-Donu, 2012.
Tkachev V. N. Arkhitekturnyy dizayn: funktsional'nye i khudozhestvennye osnovy proektirovaniya: ucheb. posobie. M., 2006. 352 s.
Review: The subject of this research is the methodology of teaching “Graphics” in the art university within the framework of summer internship. The conditions of such internship is a two-week intense educational program, based in the historical and cultural zone of a museum lasting 86 academic hours. The article describes the concept of the methods of practice goals and objectives aimed at revealing creative potential of the students within short timeframe. The research method is based on the form of interview with the Teacher of Graphics V. I. Pereyatenets, analysis and effectiveness of his methodology. The scientific novelty is structured on the selection of educational methods that consider the modern rhythms of the artistic process in order to mobilize students’ creativity. A strong factor of educational process is the teacher’s personality itself, the acquired life and creative experience, as well as pedagogical and subject knowledge. The article examines the combination of principles and approaches applied in creative practice since 1990’s. The traditional education standards in the art university are complemented with information systems that allow improving the methods, approaches and results of the students without special preliminary training. Creative thinking alongside creative discipline are cultivated in the educational process. A direct “teacher-student” dialogue, team working, presentation of creative works comprise a complex approach.
Zubrilin K. M., Rudnev I. Yu. Rol' plenera v sisteme khudozhestvennogo obrazovaniya // Nauka i shkola. 2016. № 6. S. 175-180.
Galkina M. V., Mikhaylov N. V. Praktika studenta otdeleniya dekorativno-prikladnogo iskusstva na proizvodstve // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Pedagogika. 2014. № 1. S. 100-103.
Leont'eva T. S. Eksperiment v tvorcheskoy i uchebnoy praktike khudozhnika-pedagoga Akademii akvareli i izyashchnykh iskusstv Alekseya Yur'evicha Kravchenko // Sovremennoe khudozhestvennoe obrazovanie: pedagogicheskie aspekty optimizatsii: sb. nauch. tr. mezhdunar. nauch.-prakt. konf., Moskva, 26-27 noyabrya 2015 g. / FGBOU VO Akademiya akvareli i izyashchnykh iskusstv Sergeya Andriyaki. 2015. S. 129-133.
Lysenkova O. O. Opyt tvorcheskikh plenerov studentov SPGKhPA im. A. L. Shtiglitsa v Respublike Kareliya v Natsional'nom parke «Vodlozerskiy» // Dekorativnoe iskusstvo i predmetno-prostranstvennaya sreda. Vestnik MGKhPA. 2015. № 4. S. 270-279.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.