Source: https://www.retailpatentlitigation.com/2017/04/december-2016-retail-patent-litigation-report/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 20:33:00+00:00

Document:
December filings continued to be happily slow. Frequent filers included e.Digital, Hawk Technology, Internet Medial Interactive, Phoenix Licensing, Reflection Code, Rothschild entities, Shipping & Transit, and Symbology.
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Idaho Power Company, (D. Idaho; E.D. Wis; N.D. Ind.) (multiple cases).
Phoenix Licensing, LLC et al v. Social Finance, Inc. et al, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 5,987,434 (Apparatus and method for transacting marketing and sales of financial products); 6,999,938 (Automated reply generation direct marketing system); 7,890,366 (Personalized communication documents, system and method for preparing same); 8,234,184 (Automated reply generation direct marketing system); 8,352,317 (System for facilitating production of variable offer communications); 8,738,435 (Method and apparatus for presenting personalized content relating to offered products and services); 7,860,744 (System and method for automatically providing personalized notices concerning financial products and/or services); 8,606,632 (System, method, and computer program product for selecting and presenting financial products and services); and 7,856,375 (Customized communication document creation system and method).
Geographic Location Innovations LLC v. AutoNation, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
e.Digital Corporation v. Utility Associates, Inc., (N.D. Cal.).
Patents: 8,306,514 (System and method for managing mobile communications); 8,311,522 (System and method for managing mobile communications); 8,311,524 (System and method for managing mobile communications); 9,002,331 (System and method for managing mobile communications); and 9,178,983 (System and method for managing mobile communications).
Lit v. American Airlines, Inc., (N.D. Ill.) (multiple cases).
Electronic Communication Technologies, LLC v. Acecom, Inc. d/b/a inksell.com, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 7,319,414 (Secure notification messaging systems and methods using authentication indicia); 7,876,239 (Secure notification messaging systems and methods using authentication indicia); and 9,373,261 (Secure notification messaging with user option to communicate with delivery or pickup representative).
Reflection Code LLC v. Conair Corp., (E.D. Mich.).
Shipping and Transit, LLC v. Translogistics, Inc., (W.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 6,415,207 (System and method for automatically providing vehicle status information); 6,763,299 (Notification systems and methods with notifications based upon prior stop locations); 6,904,359 (Notification systems and methods with user-definable notifications based upon occurance of events); 7,400,970 (System and method for an advance notification system for monitoring and reporting proximity of a vehicle); and 6,510,383 (Vehicular route optimization system and method).
Express Mobile, Inc. v. Blue Acorn, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Exelon Corporation, (N.D. Ill.) (multiple cases).
Rothschild Patent Imaging LLC v. ArcSoft, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Edimax Computer Company d/b/a Edimax Technology Co., Ltd.
Lorex By FLIR f/k/a Lorex Technology, Inc.
Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems, LLC v. Udemy, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 8,856,221 (System and method for storing broadcast content in a cloud-based computing environment); and 7,456,872 (Device and method for embedding and retrieving information in digital images).
Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Circle K Stores, Inc., (M.D. Fla.) (multiple cases).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.