Source: http://ubnlaw.com/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 00:55:08+00:00

Document:
Uncyk, Borenkind & Nadler, LLP is no longer accepting new matters. The law firm was established in 1973 and was rated "av" in Martindale-Hubbell Lawyers Directory (its highest rating). It stopped accepting new clients in December 2013.
Please use the following contact information for attorneys formerly associated with the firm.
Eli Uncyk, Esq. and Jeffrey S. Kofsky, Esq.
Alan Borenkind has retired from the practice of law.
For information, please call one of our attorneys.
��������� 1. Ren-Cris Litho, Inc. v. Vantage Graphics, 96-7802, UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 3333, February 24, 1997, Decided, RULES OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS MAY LIMIT CITATION TO UNPUBLISHED OPINIONS. PLEASE REFER TO THE RULES OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT., Reported in Table Case Format at: 107 F.3d 4, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 7069.
OVERVIEW: Res judicata would not operate to bar creditor's action to pierce debtor's corporate veil if there were formal barriers in the way of creditor presenting to a state court in one action its entire claim.
OVERVIEW: The court erred when it failed to comply with instructions on the first remand, therefore the cause was remanded for the court to determine what portion of the purchase price was attributable solely to the tax-exempt status of the buyer.
OVERVIEW: Print publisher was not entitled to preliminary injunction in copyright infringement action against online publisher since defendant's selection in database was not substantially similar to that of plaintiff's compilations.
OVERVIEW: Plaintiff was entitled to partial supersedeas bond against non-bankrupt defendants when full bond was far from practicable; civil contempt order was denied for lack of clear and convincing evidence of non-compliance.
6. International Distribution Ctrs. v. Walsh Trucking Co., No. 82 Civ. 8709 (JFK), UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK, 618 F. Supp. 98; 1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 18707; 1985-2 Trade Cas. (CCH) P66,665, June 20, 1985, Reversed and Remanded, February 24, 1987.
OVERVIEW: Trucking company's antitrust verdict upheld for transportation monopolization where evidence supported verdict and remittitur was ordered where jury improperly considered lost revenues not attributable to damages.
OVERVIEW: A creditor was permitted to amend its complaint against the debtor and related parties to add several additional fraudulent conveyances because they were brought within six years after they were discovered.
12. SIMON v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Docket Nos. 10911-77, 10940-77, 8908-80, 8909-80, 8910-80, 8911-80, 8912-80, 15423-80, 15627-80, 19078-80, 21030-80, 1485-81., UNITED STATES TAX COURT, T.C. Memo 1986-156; 1986 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 445; 51 T.C.M. (CCH) 872; T.C.M. (RIA) 86156, April 21, 1986.
OVERVIEW: When a manufacturer did not know of, encourage, or turn a blind eye to a contractor's violation of the "homework" provisions of the Labor Law, substantial evidence was lacking of the intent necessary to impose civil penalties.
OVERVIEW: Non-resident corporation's president, who did not reside in, but rented an apartment in New York, was not personally liable for use tax under the doctrine of piercing the corporate veil because the corporation itself was not liable for the tax.
18. Skolnick v. Goldberg, 233 [M-3514], SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 297 A.D.2d 18; 746 N.Y.S.2d 296; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8055, August 22, 2002, Decided, August 22, 2002, Entered, THE LEXIS PAGINATION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING THE RELEASE OF THE FINAL PUBLISHED VERSION.
OVERVIEW: Declaratory judgment action was devoid of merit, and appeal from the order dismissing the action served no purpose other than harassment and delay. Appropriate remedy for maintaining the frivolous appeal was reasonable attorney fees.
19. Fox v. Skolnick, 1135N, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 294 A.D.2d 225; 741 N.Y.S.2d 857; 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5338, May 21, 2002, Entered, THE LEXIS PAGINATION OF THIS DOCUMENT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE PENDING THE RELEASE OF THE FINAL PUBLISHED VERSION.
OVERVIEW: Summary judgment was properly denied first executor and the interested party's executor. The decedent's will and three codicils were properly admitted to probate because evidence of undue influence by the executrix was negligible.
OVERVIEW: A lawyer's resignation was accepted because he indicated that his resignation was freely and voluntarily tendered and that he understood the consequences of his action, and the Grievance Committee recommended that the court accept the resignation.
OVERVIEW: Revisions to a duly approved plan for construction of a public housing project, involving changes to the number, design, and height of the buildings and an increase in the number of units, did not require resubmission to the planning commission.
32. Borenkind v. Consolidated Edison Corp., Index #9231/94, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, 164 Misc. 2d 808; 626 N.Y.S.2d 414; 1995 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 194, March 28, 1995, Decided, EDITED FOR PUBLICATION, As Amended.
OVERVIEW: A utility company was not liable to landowners for the alleged effect of nearby high voltage power lines because the landowners presented no evidence that the authorized public use was unreasonably, negligently, or dangerously carried out.
OVERVIEW: A seller was not entitled to a grant of summary judgment in her action against an escrow agent because the court was prohibited from inquiring into the bona fides of the dispute because arbitration was sought.
36. People v. Sybil Holding Corp., [NO NUMBER IN ORIGINAL], Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Term, First Department, 70 Misc. 2d 798; 334 N.Y.S.2d 810; 1972 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2228, February 10, 1972, See People v. Sybil Holding Corp., 64 Misc 2d 693.
38. Kulick v. Department of Revenue, OREGON TAX COURT, 7 OTR 471; 1978 Ore. Tax LEXIS 43, July 12, 1978, Decision for defendant rendered.
OVERVIEW: Nonresident shareholders of a resident S-corporation were subject to personal income tax on the distributed and undistributed taxable income of the corporation; the constitution did not bar the assessment of the tax.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.