Source: https://www.benchmarklitigation.com/firms/nathanson-schachter-and-thompson/f-1657
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 04:02:50+00:00

Document:
The Firm: Led by four Queen’s Counsel, Nathanson, Schachter & Thompson LLP’s practice is limited to civil litigation, with a focus on business disputes and arbitration. The firm has litigated many of British Columbia’s largest and most complicated commercial lawsuits, including two of Canada’s largest mining claims, and leading securities and shareholder disputes.
Known for its intellectual rigour, high quality advocacy, responsiveness to clients’ needs, and flexibility in procedural matters, the firm has experience arguing and defending certification motions, judicial reviews, summary trials, trials, and appeals.
The firm utilizes its expertise to provide strategic advice and to seek practical solutions out of court. When that is not possible, NST’s lawyers have the courtroom experience to see a matter through to judgment. The firm’s success is the result of its team approach to efficiently and effectively resolving business disputes.
In addition to the firm’s four Queen’s Counsel, the firm includes many former law clerks from the Court of Appeal and Supreme Court of Canada. The firm’s lawyers regularly contribute to legal scholarship, including: serving as adjunct professors at UBC Law School; writing chapters in texts on Business Torts, Government Liability, and the Annual Review of Law and Practice; frequently speaking at continuing legal education events on civil litigation law and practice; and authoring two of the province’s main litigation handbooks, the annual British Columbia Supreme Court Rules Annotated, and The Civil Appeal Handbook.
Representative Work: The firm’s lawyers have the trial and appellate expertise to handle a broad rangeof civil and business disputes including mining claims, hostile takeover bids, shareholder disputes, securities matters, class proceedings, pension litigation, actions for professional negligence, administrative proceedings, breach of contract, defamation, construction disputes, and employment matters.
The firm’s lawyers have extensive experience before all levels of court, including the Supreme Court of Canada, and before administrative tribunals. The firm is often retained specifically to act as appellate counsel.
In addition, Mr. Clemens has an active practice arbitrating and mediating awide variety of commercial disputes as a neutral.
Mining Disputes: The firm has successfully represented clients in two of Canada’s most significant mining cases: Minera Aquiline Argentina SA v. IMA Explorations Inc. and Inmet Mining Corp. v. Homestake Canada Inc. In Minera Aquiline, the defendant was compelled to transfer to the plaintiff the Navidad Project – a world class silver deposit in Argentina – as a result of its unlawful use of confidential exploration data. In Inmet, the plaintiff vendor of a gold mine was awarded $111 million from the defendant who unlawfully refused to complete a purchase agreement on the basis of an alleged failure to disclose material facts.
Oppression Claims/Securities/Shareholder Disputes: In Icahn Partners LP v. Lions Gate Entertainment Corp., the firm successfully represented a New York hedge fund both at trial and on appeal in a shareholders’ oppression action seeking to set aside transactions converting approximately $110 million from debt to equity. This matter was successfully defended on its merits with in three months of the disputed conversion.
In Telus Corp. v. Mason Capital Management LLC, the firm represented Mason Capital, an American hedge fund, in a corporate battle against Telus. The case was notable for its compressed time frame.
Class Actions: In Sun-Rype Products Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland and Others the firm successfully represented, ultimately before the Supreme Court of Canada, one of the defendants in a class proceeding alleging a conspiracy to fix prices in the sale and distribution of high-fructose corn syrup.
Pension Litigation: In Bower v. Cominco Ltd., the firm successfully defended a $78 million claimby pensioners alleging an unlawful pension surplus transfer between plans.
In Buschau v. Rogers Cablesystems Inc., the firm successfully defended related actions, twice appearing in the Supreme Court of Canada, in which employees sought to recover pension surplus by forcing the wind-up of a close pension plan following the employer’s removal of funds in breach of trust.
Partnership/Human Rights Law: In McCormick v. Fasken Martineau DuMoulin LLP, the firm represented a leading national law firm before the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court of Canada in relation to a former partner’s human rights age discrimination complaint.
Defamation: In Hughes v. Vander Zalm, the firm successfully represented B.C.’s former conflict of interest commissioner Ted Hughes in a jury trial against former B.C. Premier Bill Vander Zalm.
Benchmark Canada listed the firm as B.C. litigation “Firm of the Year” in February 2013, and has listed five of the firm’s lawyers as “Litigation Stars” since 2012: Irwin G. Nathanson, Q.C., Stephen R. Schachter, Q.C., Murray Clemens, QC, James C. MacInnis, and Karen Carteri. Irwin Nathanson and Stephen Schachter have also been recognized as two of Canada’s Top 50 Trial Lawyers. Peter Senkpiel & Kevin Loo have been recognized as Future Stars.
Best Lawyers in Canada has consistently ranked members of the firm, including partners James C. MacInnis and Kevin D. Loo, as leading lawyers in a variety of categories, including Bet-the-Company Litigation, Class Action Litigation, Corporation and Commercial Litigation, Director and Officer Liability, Labour and Employment, and Securities Law.
Chambers Global ranks Nathanson Schachter & Thompson LLP in its top category of dispute resolution firms in Vancouver, identifying the firm as ‘historically a top player in the province’.
Lexpert has ranked the firm in its top tier of litigation specialty firms in Vancouver since the inception of that publication. It ranks four of the firm’s partners as leading commercial litigators in Vancouver.
A true litigation boutique, Vancouver’s Nathanson Schachter & Thompson is held in the highest esteem by fellow litigators from within the province and beyond. The firm’s practice scope, while narrower than that of some other boutiques, is still fairly diverse within the realm of business and corporate litigation, covering mining claims, shareholders’ disputes, hostile takeover bids and derivative actions, securities matters, class and representative proceedings, pension litigation, professional negligence, and administrative proceedings. Following a philosophy of “high quality not high quantity,” the firm does not take on many cases by volume and gets most of its work from referrals. However, there seems to be no shortage of peers who gladly refer.
Name partners Irwin Nathanson and Stephen Schachter remain seasoned figureheads, both recipients of unanimous acclaim. “These guys are two of the most youthful senior partners you’re likely to meet,” quips one peer. “Age has not dimmed either of their lustres, it has only enhanced their experience and tactical abilities. They are both very congenial and collegial, but they can both turn deadly when need be. They are still engaged and in the game and, while they may show up on cases less than they used to, you would be unwise to underestimate either of them when they do.” It is also noted, however, that “Nathanson Schachter has been grooming some great younger talent and turning them loose. This is a wise move, and a necessary one. The senior partners are still forces to be reckoned with, but they are going to need people to hand the torch to, and they managed to make this transition with people like James MacInnis, Karen Carteri, Kevin Loo and Peter Senkpiel (the latter of whom peers refer to as “an ambitious go-getter” and who saw a promotion to partner level in 2018). They are getting a nice variety great cases coming their way.” MacInnis and Senkpiel act for Rising Sun, who sold two parcels of land for $40 million, having purchased the lands in the prior year for $30 million. The plaintiff in this matter alleges it is entitled to 20% of the profits as consideration for assistance in locating financing for the original purchase. “James MacInnis is my go-to for referrals these days, if he’s available,” confirms a peer. Schachter and Loo act for LTS Infrastructure Services, the plaintiff in claims for damages arising out of the construction of a fiber optic line in the Northwest Territories, valued at $100 million. “It obviously takes time to get up to the level of someone like Steve Schachter, but Kevin Loo doesn’t get enough credit,” insists a peer. “He is a very smart guy and responsible for a lot of the brain work and behind-the-scenes ‘hustle’ on a lot of this work.” Carteri acted successfully for a shareholder/partner in respect of its claims of oppression against the other shareholder/partner/director, including defeating the other shareholders buyout premised on alleged defaults by the client, who also successfully challenged the opponent’s valuation of the shares for the buyout and succeeded in establishing that a fair value valuation was warranted and in establishing the existence of a disputed partnership interest that increased share value. In sum. the share price was found to be $19.85 million, almost double that sought to be paid by the oppressing shareholder.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.