Source: https://www.wnclaw.com/recommendations
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 14:39:18+00:00

Document:
Kabasan v. Kabasan (COA 17-254) – Jim Siemens for the Wife in which the Court of Appeals found that the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it accepted the testimony of the wife’s expert in forensic accounting and valuation.
Lund v. Lund (COA 16-813) – Jim Siemens for the Husband in which the Court of Appeals held that the trial court properly found the Wife’s testimony on value not credible.
Lund v. Lund (COA 15-175) – Jim Siemens for the Husband in which the Court of Appeals held that the Husband’s expert properly valued and distributed the Wife’s pension.
Duncan v. Duncan (COA 12-399-2) – Jim Siemens for the Wife in which the Court of Appeals held that the Husband was equitably estopped from challenging the validity of a marriage.
Sluder v. Sluder (COA 08-1188) – Jim Siemens for the Husband in which the Court of Appeals vacated an alimony ruling of the trial court.
Inman v. Inman (COA 04-398) – Jim Siemens for the Husband in which the Court of Appeals vacated a child support ruling of the trial court. 2005 N.C. App. LEXIS 127.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.