Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/321207796/Dario-Suarez-Valenzuela-v-Eric-Holder-Jr-4th-Cir-2013
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 22:09:40+00:00

Document:
Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
opinion, in which Judge Niemeyer and Judge Duncan joined.
Washington, D.C., for Respondent. ON BRIEF: David J.
but the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) reversed.
men in a white van approached them to intimidate Jason.
head, and died moments later. Luis then shot SuarezValenzuela in the foot.
told the authorities that Luis killed Jason.
although he served only three months of that sentence.
Luis remained employed as a police officer following his conviction.
went to live with his grandmother in order to avoid Luis.
national identity database to locate him anywhere in Peru.
illegally entered the United States in January 1999.
unaware whether the other individual was a police officer.
same threats to Suarez-Valenzuelas father in 1999.
who conducted the interview concluded that SuarezValenzuela had demonstrated a reasonable fear of torture.
and the perpetrators of those abuses are rarely punished.
Peru. The judge therefore granted Suarez-Valenzuelas application for withholding of removal to Peru under the CAT.
has since removed Suarez-Valenzuela to Peru.
pursuant to 8 U.S.C. 1252 and 28 U.S.C. 2349(a).
would be compelled to conclude to the contrary." 8 U.S.C.
also Rusu v. INS, 296 F.3d 316, 325 n.14 (4th Cir. 2002).
agency for additional investigation or explanation." INS v.
prime example of cases for which remand is appropriate).
should remand the case to allow the BIA to correct its error.
v. Gonzales, 467 F.3d 921, 927 (6th Cir. 2006); Lopez-Soto v.
have rejected it for that reason. See Hakim, 628 F.3d at 15557; McIntosh v. Clement, 247 F. Appx 226, 227-28 (2d Cir.
control persons or groups engaging in torturous activity").
actually applied the willful acceptance standard.
information regarding conditions in the country of removal"
Human Rights Practices for Peru. Id. 1208.16(c)(3)(iii)-(iv).
database to locate and torture Peruvian citizens.
was not consistent with the willful acceptance standard.
reasons outlined below, we hold that substantial evidence supports the BIAs conclusions.
leadership had changed and that the government had "attempt[ed] to cull corrupt individuals in positions of authority."
their official capacity, will acquiesce or consent to his torture."
unlikely to acquiesce to Suarez-Valenzuelas torture.
past torture and whether that torture was likely to reoccur.
that the other officers who assisted Luis "may have acquiesced to the harm the applicant received by not intervening,"
of the applicants claim," Tassi v. Holder, 660 F.3d 710, 719 (4th Cir.
determining that Luis and his accomplices were "rogue officers."
relocation in his reply brief.
overcome the rule regarding abandonment for this reason).
Hasan v. Ashcroft, 380 F.3d 1114, 1123 (9th Cir. 2004).
not that the government would acquiesce to SuarezValenzuelas torture upon his return to Peru.
therefore decline to address this argument.
Georgia Court of Appeals Order Lowe v Lowe.

References: v. 
 v.

v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.