Source: https://www.mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/931/rights-of-students
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 06:19:01+00:00

Document:
Constitutional provisions safeguarding individual rights place limits on the government and its agents, but not on private institutions or individuals. Thus, to speak of the First Amendment rights of students is to speak of students in public elementary, secondary, and higher education institutions. Private schools are not government actors and thus there is no state action trigger.
Another important distinction that has emerged from Supreme Court decisions is the difference between students in public elementary and secondary schools and those in public colleges and universities. The latter group of students, presumably more mature, do not present the kind of disciplinary problems that educators encounter in grade school and high school, so the courts have deemed it reasonable to treat the two groups differently.
The first major Supreme Court decision protecting the First Amendment rights of children in a public elementary school was West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette (1943). A group of Jehovah’s Witnesses challenged the state’s law requiring all public school students to salute the flag and recite the Pledge of Allegiance. Students who did not participate faced expulsion.
The Jehovah’s Witnesses argued that saluting the flag was incompatible with their religious beliefs barring the worship of idols or graven images and thus constituted a violation of their free exercise of religion and freedom of speech rights. The Supreme Court agreed, 6-3. Its decision overturned an earlier case, Minersville School District v. Gobitis (1940), in which the Court had rejected a challenge by Jehovah’s Witnesses to a similar Pennsylvania law.
In the early 1960s, the Court in several cases—most notably Engel v. Vitale (1962) and Abington School District v. Schempp (1963)—overturned state laws mandating prayer or Bible reading in public schools. Later in that same decade, the Court in Epperson v. Arkansas (1968) found an Arkansas law banning the teaching of evolution in public schools to be an unconstitutional violation of the establishment clause.
In Tinker, resulting in the Court’s most important student speech decision, authorities had banned students from wearing black armbands after learning that some of them planned to do so as a means of protesting the deaths caused by the Vietnam War. Other symbols, including the Iron Cross, were allowed. In a 7-2 vote, the Court found a violation of the First Amendment speech rights of students and teachers because school officials had failed to show that the student expression caused a substantial disruption of school activities or invaded the rights of others.
In later cases—Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser (1986) and Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier (1988) and Morse v. Frederick (2007)—the Court rejected student claims by stressing the important role of public schools in inculcating values and promoting civic virtues. The Court instead gave school officials considerable leeway to regulate with respect to curricular matters or where student expression takes place in a school-sponsored setting, such as a school newspaper (Kuhlmeier) or an assembly (Fraser). Years later, in Morse v. Frederick (2007), the Court created another exception to Tinker, ruling that public school officials can prohibit student speech that officials reasonably believe promotes illegal drug use.
The different level of protection accorded to students in institutions of higher education, who are generally eighteen years or older and thus legally adults, is evident from several cases. Students on college and university campuses enjoy more academic freedom than secondary school students.
However, in recent years, courts have applied principles and standards from K-12 cases to college and university students. For example, in Hosty v. Carter (7th Cir. 2005), the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that college officials did not violate the First Amendment and applied reasoning from the high school Hazelwood decision. More recent lower court decisions also have applied the Hazelwood standard in cases involving curricular disputes, professionalism concerns, and even the online speech of college and university students.
Students in private universities—which are not subject to the requirements of the First Amendment—may rely on state laws to ensure certain basic freedoms. For example, many state cases have established that school policies, student handbooks, and other relevant documents represent a contract between the college or university and the student. Schools that promise to respect and foster academic freedom, open expression, and freedom of conscience on their campus must deliver the rights they promise.
Chemerinsky, Erwin. Constitutional Law: Principles and Policies. 2d ed. New York: Aspen Law and Business, 2002.
Daugherty, Denise. “Free Speech in Public Schools:Has the Supreme Court Created a Haven for Viewpoint Discrimination in School-Sponsored Speech.” Georgia State University Law Review 20 (Summer 2004):1061–1085.
Fischer, L., D.Schimmel, and L. Stellman. Teachers and the Law. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 2002.
French, David A. FIRE’s Guide to Religious Liberty on Campus. Philadelphia: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, 2002.
French, David A., Greg L. Lukianoff, and Harvey A. Silvergate. FIRE’s Guide to Free Speech on Campus. Philadelphia: Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, 2005.
Haynes, Charles C., et al. The First Amendment in Schools. Alexandria, Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2003.
Raskin, Jamie. We the Students: Supreme Court Decisions for and about Students. 2d ed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press, 2008.
LoMonte, Frank. “The Key Word is ‘Student’: Hazelwood Censorship Crashes the Ivy-Covered Gates.” First Amendment L. Rev. 11 (2013): 305 – 363.
Papandrea, Mary Rose. “The Free Speech Rights of University Students.” Minn. L. Rev. 101 (2017): 1801 -1861.
"The First Amendment in Schools: A Resource Guide." National Coalition Against Censorship, July 10, 2013.
Slocum, Rebecca. "Do Student Protesters Have First Amendment Rights?" The Office for Intellectual Freedom of the American Library Association, March 21, 2018.
Bomboy, Scott. "Public school student free speech: A primer." National Constitution Center, March 16, 2018.
Nott, Lata and Gene Policinski. "School Walkouts in the Wake of 'Parkland' - Protected by the First Amendment Or Not?" Newseum, Feb. 22, 2018.
Hudson, David L. Jr. "9th Circuit: School officials can punish student for off-campus-created hit list," The First Amendment Encyclopedia, March 21, 2019.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.