Source: https://stus.com/MK-v-Tenet-cartoon-civ0004
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 19:47:04+00:00

Document:
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 20(a) permits joinder of plaintiffs if all claims arose out of the same transaction or occurrence and share common questions of law or fact, permissive joinder.
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Koenig; Just as questions from the bench can provide insight that helps lawyers make a stronger case, so too can questions from the jury help lawyers tailor their presentations; motion in limine.
National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Szukhent; a contractually designated agent's prompt acceptance and transmittal to named defendants of a summons and complaint, pursuant to authorization contained in the contract, constitutes adequate service.
Castano v. American Tobacco; A district court must conduct a rigorous analysis of the Rule 23 prerequisites before certifying a class; sui generis.
Brent Taylor, Petitioner v. Robert A. Sturgell, Acting Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration, et al.; rule against nonparty preclusion; nonparties are rarely bound by earlier judgments in similar cases.
J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro; purposeful contact with state is required to trigger jurisdiction.
Gunn v. Minton; legal malpractice cases do not arise under federal law even when the underlying case involved a controversy over the application of federal law.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
sui generis
 v. 
 v. 
 v.