Source: http://privatelaw.com.cn/Web_P/N_Show/?News_CPI=10&PID=12203
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 18:24:02+00:00

Document:
Carter v. Boehm (1766)3 Burr.1905.
See John Birds, Ben Lynch & Simon Milnes, MacGillivray on Insurance Law, Sweet & Maxwell,2012， para.17-002.
(1743)2 Str 1183，93 Eng. Rep.1115，1378-1865.
(1723)2 P Wms 170，24 Eng. Rep.686，1557-1865.
See Howard Bennett, The Law of Marine Insurance, Oxford: Oxford University Press,2006， p.105.
Manifest Shipping Company Limited v. Uni-Polaris Shipping Company Limited and La Reunion Europeene,1 Lloyd’ s Rep.389，398.
See Margaret C. Hemsworth, The Fate of “Good Faith” in Insurance Contracts, LMCLQ 143，143-170.
See Johan Hendrik Botes, From Good Faith to Utmost Good Faith in Marine Insurance, Pieterlen: Feter Lang GmbH,2006， p.215.
See Rhidian Thomas (ed.)， The Modern Law of Marine Insurance, Volume II, London: LLP,2002， p.29.
有观点认为，“第17条位于‘告知与陈述’的标题下，因此第17条仅适用于告知与陈述相关的事项。而第18条规定被保险人的告知义务仅限于保险合同订立前，因此，第17条相应地也应仅适用于保险合同订立前。”相反的观点则指出，“告知义务源于最大诚信义务，而不是相反。虽然二者存在交叉的部分，但不能将二者等同。最大诚信义务有着更广的外延。” See Susan Hodges, Law of Marine Insurance, London: Cavendish Publishing Limited,1996， p.83.
Manifest Shipping Company Limited v. Uni-Polaris Shipping Company Limited and La Reunion Europeene,1 Lloyd’ s Rep.389，401，402，407.
Agapitos v. Agnew (No 1)(The Aegeon)， EWCA Civ 247， QB 556.
See M. A. Clarke, J. M. Burling & R. L. Purves, The Law of Insurance Contracts, Informa Law from Routledge Press,2006， para.27-2 C3； Lord Mance, The 1906 Act, Common Law and Contract Clauses― All in Harmony？ LMCLQ 346，346-360.
 EWCA Civ 112，1 All ER (Comm)445.
1 Q. B.665，2 A. C.249.
See Jonathan Gilman, Robert M. Merkin, Claire Blanchard & Mark Templeman, Arnould’ s Law of Marine Insurance and Average, London: Sweet & Maxwell,2013， pp.824-825.
Para.109 of Explanatory Notes of Insurance Bill [HL] as introduced in the House of Lords on 17 th July 2014[HL Bill 39]， https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/insurance/documents.html.
英国法下误述和未告知经常在同一组事实中被同时主张。在商事诉讼中，涉及到保险合同的场合经常是“未告知”占主导地位。“从历史上看，误述在保险合同的环境下并不具有特别的重要性。部分原因是告知重要事实本身的极度宽泛意味着未告知已经将误述的问题包括在内。” See J. Birds, Birds’ Modern Insurance Law,9 th ed.， London: Sweet & Maxwell,2013， pp.114-115.
Art.1.106 of Lando Commission’ s Principles of European Contract Law.
Interfoto Picture Library Ltd v. Stiletto Visual Programs Ltd,(1989) QB 433.
See J. Chitty & H. G Beale, Chitty on Contracts,31 st ed.， London: Sweet & Maxwell,2012， para.001-041.
Yam Seng Pte Ltd v. International Trade Corp Ltd,(2013) EWHC 111(QB).
Walford v. Miles,(1992)2 AC 128.
Petromec Inc v. Petroleo Brasileiro SA Petrobras (No.3)，(2006)1 Lloyd’ s Rep.121.
O’ Neill v. Phillips,(1999)1 WLR 1092.
Malik v. Bank of Credit and Commerce International SA,(1998) A. C.20.
C. V. G. Siderurgicia Del Orinoco S. A.v. London Steamship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Ltd.，(1979)1 Lloyd ’ s Rep.557.
Government of The Republic of Spain v. North of England S. S. Co. Ltd.，(1938)61 Ll. L. Rep.44； Abu Dhabi National Tanker Co.v. Product Star Shipping Ltd.，(1993)1 Lloyd’ s Rep.397.
Courtney & Fairburn Ltd v. Tolaini Bros (Hotels) Ltd,(1975)1 WLR 297.
参见前引，齐默曼等书，第109页。但就海上保险法而言，美国最高法院霍姆斯大法官曾主张，“在海上保险领域，有必要与英国保险法保持一致”。See Queen Ins. Co.of American v. Globe & Rotgers Fire Ins. Co.，263U. S.487，44 S. Ct.175，1924 A. M. C.107.
Marine Insurance Act 1984 of Australia, Part II-The duty of the utmost good faith.
In Emirates Trading Agency LLC v. Prime Mineral Exports Private Limited, EW, HC 2104(Comm )，1 July 2014； In Bristol Groundschool Ltd v. Intelligent Data Capture Ltd & ors  EWHC 2145(Ch)，2 July 2014.
See S. Henchcliffe, Insurance Claims: Fraud and Duty of Good Faith,8 Insurance Law Journal 210(1997). See also F. Hawke, Utmost Good Faith: What Does It Really Mean？，6(2) Insurance Law Journal 91(1994).
See Howard Bennett, Mapping the Doctrine of Utmost Good Faith in Insurance Contract Law, Lloyd’ s Maritime & Commercial Law Quarterly, Issue 2，1999， p.165.
参见前引， Gilman等书，第586页；Manifest Shipping Co Ltd v. Uni-polaris Insurance Co Ltd and Others (The Star Sea)1 Lloyd ’ s Rep.389； K/S Merc-Scandia XXXXII v. Certain Lloyd ’ s Underwriters (The Mercandian Continent) ECWA Civ 1275，2 Lloyd’ s Rep.563； Pan Atlantic Insurance Co Ltd v. Pine Top Insurance Co Ltd 1 AC 501，2 Lloyd’ s Rep.427； HIH Casualty and General Insurance Ltd and Others v. Chase Manhattan Bank and Others  UKHL 6，2 Lloyd’ s Rep.61.
其在当时的《芝加哥大学法学评论》上发表了题为“规则模式”(The Model of Rule)的论文。该文针对哈特的“规则理论”(哈特认为法律由“第一性规则”和“第二性规则”结合而成)指出，法律不仅包括规则，也包括原则和政策，原则与政策又被视为广义的原则。法律规则与法律原则这两种彼此对应的法规范形态由此确立。 See Ronald M. Dworkin, The Model of Rules,35(1) The University of Chicago Law Review 14-46(Autumn,1967).
Pan Atlantic Insurance Co. Ltd.and Another v. Pine Top Insurance Co. Ltd.2 Lloyd’ s Rep.427，440.
See the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission (LAW COM No 353)(SCOT LAW COM No 238)， Insurance Contract Law: Business Disclosure; Warranties; Insurers’ Remedies for Fraudulent Claims; and Late Payment, July 2014， p.321， http://www.gov.uk/government/publications.
WISE (Underwriting Agency) Ltd v. Group Nacional Provincial SA, EWCA Civ 962，2 All ER 613.
Page 7 of Insurance bill [HL]， prepared by Special Public Bill Committee, published by the Authority of the House of Lords,24 December 2014， https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldinsur/81/81.pdf.
Para.10 of Explanatory Notes of Insurance Bill [HL] as introduced in the House of Lords on 17 th July 2014[HL Bill 39]， https://services.parliament.uk/bills/2014-15/insurance/documents.html.
Final Report of Insurance Fraud Taskforce (January 2016)， p.3， p.81， www.gov.uk/government/publications/insurance - fraud - taskforce - final - report.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 EWCA 
 EWCA 

Art.1
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 UKHL 
 v. 
 v. 
 EWCA