Source: https://www.retailpatentlitigation.com/2017/02/november-2016-retail-patent-litigation-report/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 20:13:23+00:00

Document:
November filings slowed a bit from the September / October pace. Frequent filers included Grecia, Hawk Technology, Pherah, Phoenix Licensing and Symbology.
Grecia v. Adobe Systems Incorporated, (N.D. Ca.; N.D. Ill.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 8,402,555 (Personalized digital media access system (PDMAS); and 8,533,860 (Personalized digital media access system–PDMAS part II).
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. Louisville Arena Authority, Inc., (W.D. Ky.; S.D. Fla.; N.D. Ill.) (multiple cases).
Triad Catalog Co., LLC d/b/a Soft Surroundings v. Landmark Technology, LLC, (E.D. Mo.).
Internet Media Interactive Corporation v. Deere & Company d/b/a John Deere Company, (N.D. Ill.).
Pherah LLC v. NeoGrid North America LLC, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Aeritas, LLC v. Walgreen Co., (E.D. Tex.).
Patents: 7,706,819 (Mixed-mode interaction); 8,055,285 (Mixed-mode interaction); and 9,390,435 (Mixed-mode interaction).
Rothschild Broadcast Distribution Systems, LLC v. Beachbody LLC, (E.D. Tex.).
Patent: 8,856,221 (System and method for storing broadcast content in a cloud-based computing environment).
Serenitiva LLC v. SolarWinds, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 6,865,268 (Dynamic, real-time call tracking for web-based customer relationship management).
Venadium LLC v. New Avon, LLC, (E.D. Tex.).
Symbology Innovations, LLC v. First National Bank of Omaha, (N.D. Ill.) (multiple cases).
Verify Smart Corp. v. Discover Financial Services, (D.N.J.; S.D.N.Y.) (multiple cases).
Virtual Immersion Technologies LLC v. Hyatt Corporation, (E.D. Tex.).
Patent: 6,409,599 (Interactive virtual reality performance theater entertainment system).
Smartrac IP BV v. Safeguard Business Systems, Inc. et al, (N.D. Tex.).
Patents: 6,088,230 (Procedure for producing a chip mounting board and chip-mounting board thus produced); and 6,233,818 (Method and device for bonding a wire conductor).
Phoenix Licensing, LLC et al v. Enova International, Inc. et al, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 5,987,434 (Apparatus and method for transacting marketing and sales of financial products); 6,999,938 (Automated reply generation direct marketing system); 7860744 (System and method for automatically providing personalized notices concerning financial products and/or services); 7,890,366 (Personalized communication documents, system and method for preparing same); 8,234,184 (Automated reply generation direct marketing system); 8,352,317 (System for facilitating production of variable offer communications); 8,738,435 (Method and apparatus for presenting personalized content relating to offered products and services); 7,856,375 (Customized communication document creation system and method); and 8,073,735 (System and method for automating financial document compliance).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.