Source: http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50k/legal/a7/3586.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 19:57:34+00:00

Document:
1. I am the defendant in this case. Except for those facts stated on information and belief, I have personal knowledge of the facts herein, and could competently testify concerning these facts if required to do so.
If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same;...They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
The subject “contract” is an instrument in and evidence of that criminal conspiracy, and all of the “beneficiaries’” efforts to enforce said “contract,” including judicially using the Marin Superior Court, are unlawful acts in furtherance of said criminal conspiracy.
right to the free exercise of religion; right to freedom from slavery; right to freedom of speech; right to self-defense; right to freedom of association; right to due process; right to communicate with or petition government agencies; right to report crimes; litigant’s privilege; doctor-patient privilege; clergyman-penitent privilege.
6. In December 1986, I was brought to sign the subject “contract” by threat from the persons and entities comprising the “contract’s” Scientology-related “parties,” “releasees” or “beneficiaries,” hereinafter “beneficiaries,” by fraud perpetrated by these “beneficiaries” against me, and by God Himself for His Purposes. I have detailed a great amount of the circumstances and events underlying and forming this duress, fraud and Divine Action in many sworn statements, including my Complaint Report to the Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, Exhibit A hereto, which I incorporate herein by reference.
low ethics attorneys, and thousands of aggressive mind controlled fanatics to carry out its attacks against people declared Suppressive Persons like me. Scientology has a history of criminality, publishes policies calling for crimes against people, and trains its personnel to implement and execute those policies.
If you uniformly apply the tactics and strategy of battle to the rows we get into, press or legal or public confrontation, you will win.
But there are also wars of attrition. We are engaged in one where total destruction of us has been the enemy's aim for, at this writing, 19 years. This is barbarian warfare, thus the enemy must have had very positive fears and terrors about us. Since he fought for total attrition. In this case it is not safe to hope for any half way win. We must ourselves fight on a basis of total attrition of the enemy. So never get reasonable about him. Just go all the way in and obliterate him.
It is bad warfare to fight battles on your own terrain, in your own subject area. It is not good to fight in the territory of allies. Fight battles wherever possible only on enemy terrain, in and about his subject and his people, not ours. You can gauge your relative success by this. When all your battles are fought on his terrain, you are winning.
A good general expends the maximum of enemy troops and the minimum of his own.
He makes the war costly to the enemy, not to himself.
One cuts off enemy communications, funds, connections. He deprives the enemy of political advantages, connections and power. He takes over enemy territory. He raids and harrasses.
Intelligence identifies targets and finds out enemy plans and purposes, enemy connections, dispositions, etc.
The prize is "public opinion" where press is concerned. The only safe public opinion to head for is they love us and are in a frenzy of hate against the enemy, this means standard wartime propaganda is what one is doing, complete with atrocity, war crimes trials, the lot. Know the mores of your public opinion, what they hate. That's the enemy. What they love. That's you.
I studied this policy letter inside Scientology, and am familiar with its implementation inside and outside Scientology. The “enemy” Hubbard refers to and orders be attacked is the class of citizens that Scientology declares to be “Suppressive Persons” or “SPs.” The kinds of attacks on SPs and their lives and livelihoods that Hubbard orders in this policy letter are forms of Fair Game; e.g., waging a war of total attrition on people, expending the maximum of these people, making the war costly on them, cutting off people’s communications, funds and connections, depriving them of political advantages, connections and power, raiding and harassing them, turning public opinion into a frenzy of hate” against them, degrading these people’s image to beast level, and going all the way in and obliterating them. This policy letter is claimed by Scientology to be “religious scripture,” and must be obeyed by Scientology’s members and agents.
9. The original policy letter “Battle Tactics” that I studied was published and distributed by Hubbard in 1969. Exhibit [B] hereto is a copy of this policy letter as it was reissued September 24, 1987, identical to the 1969 issue, except for the “updated distribution.” This reissuance of Hubbard’s policy letter that orders this ruthless fair game against Suppressive Persons, less than a year after Scientology’s promise to end Fair Game forever in order to get Armstrong to sign the subject “contract,” is clear evidence of the falseness of that promise.
OSA employee Frank Oliver. I have been in communication with Mr. Oliver to obtain a declaration from Mr. Oliver newly authenticating Scientology’s checksheet for filing in the instant proceeding, but have learned that Mr. Oliver has been intimidated by threat of retaliation into not assisting me by providing me with such a declaration. It is my belief that if this Court ordered that Mr. Oliver not be retaliated against in any manner for providing me with such a declaration that he would provide it. The checksheet appears in every way to be genuine, and I have no reason to doubt its authenticity. It is similar to a checksheet I had and used inside Scientology that also required the study of “Battle Tactics” and similar directives.
“Stable datum” is a Scientology term meaning the one datum from which a whole body of knowledge is built, the datum which keeps the entire body of knowledge from falling apart, the datum on which all other things in a subject aligned. Total attrition of Suppressive Persons, never getting reasonable about SPs, and going all the way in and obliterating them, is clearly vital to the “body of knowledge” that is Scientology. This checksheet and the obvious intention therein to train Scientology personnel to wage a war of total attrition on SPs and obliterate them is clear evidence of fraud in Scientology’s promise to me in 1986 to end Fair Game.
broke into my car and stole my documents plus irreplaceable artwork, disseminated my confidential psychotherapy records, terrorized me now for twenty-two years, and subjected me to a vicious global black propaganda campaign. Scientology has waged a war of total attrition on me that continues to this day, and seeks to go all the way in and obliterate me, to expend me, to make Scientology’s war costly on me, to cut off my communications, funds and connections, to deprive me of political advantages and power, and to raid and harass me. Scientology and those persons serving its malevolent purposes have pumped out a river of black propaganda to degrade my image to beast level, and to turn public opinion into a frenzy of hate against me. Appended hereto as Exhibit [D] is a true and correct copy of Internet postings or excerpts from postings containing black propaganda on me that were made by Scientology agents or persons serving Scientology’s purposes to the Usenet newsgroup alt.religion.scientology. This is only part of such postings, and for economy and clarity I have deleted from these postings text that did not refer to me.
13. At the time of the December 1986 “settlement,” my attorney Michael Flynn told me that if I didn’t sign Scientology’s “contract,” Scientology would continue to Fair Game me, Flynn and his family, the other Scientology victims that Flynn represented, and Fair Game anyone else Scientology wanted. I knew very well what Fair Game was, and understood very well the terrible threat that Scientology was making. I have described this duress in my sworn Complaint Report, Ex. A, p. 37, para. 123 The burden of having to sign Scientology’s onerous, indeed impossible, “contract” in order to have the organization stop its fair game attacks on my attorney and his family, on his clients, on my friends, on the rest of humanity, and on myself, was unbearable. In a strange flash of prescience while under this awful pressure, I saw the “contract” as an act of fair game and saw myself as Scientology’s fair game target for years into the future, isolated and fair gamed by the very contract I was being told would end fair game forever– exactly as has happened. Relying on Flynn’s representations that the “contract’s” conditions that I found intolerable were “not worth the paper they’re printed on,” and having no choice but to sign, I submitted to the whole farce, which included playing my fool’s role in Scientology’s videotaping of the “contract” signing spectacle.
world. Immediately following my signing, however, Scientology continued to Fair Game me and Fair Games me to this day. Scientology’s acts against me in execution of the Fair Game policy following my signing of the “contract” include, but are not limited to, distributing edited perverse versions of illegal, secretly made videotapes of me, filing sworn statements about me in legal proceedings falsely accusing me of crimes, threatening me on multiple occasions, filing false criminal charges against me, assaulting me on three occasions, carrying out a massive global black propaganda campaign against me, forging my signature to hate postings to the Internet, spying on me, more secret videotaping of me, terrorizing my friends and me on the freeway, terrorizing us with a phony bomb threat, obtaining unlawful court orders against me including the Marin Superior Court’s summary adjudication and summary judgment orders, injunction, judgment, contempt orders, and arrest warrants, and by seeking “judicially” and extra-judicially to deprive me of my rights and privileges secured to me by the U.S. Constitution and laws.
is unlawful, and is an act by Scientology in furtherance of its 18 U.S.C. 241 conspiracy to deprive me of my rights and privileges secured to me by the U.S. Constitution and laws. Also, because of Flynn’s assurance that the “contract’s” liquidated damages provision was not worth the paper it was printed on, there was absolutely no negotiation by me with Scientology, or even via Flynn with Scientology, regarding liquidated damages and no discussion whatsoever regarding their reasonableness. It was completely understood by me at the time of the settlement that the liquidated damages condition and amount were utterly unreasonable. I am certain that they are just as unreasonable today, and, I believe, even more unreasonable given the now obvious conclusion that this liquidated damages condition, its enforcement by Judge Thomas, and every way in which it has been used by Scientology against me and against others, constitute acts in furtherance of serious civil rights crimes.
is also worth $50,000.00, as is “I'll say $1,500,002. That's my figure.” and “I'll say $1,500,003. That's my figure.” etc. I believe that I can generate utterances, orally and by computer and other communication media, that would have a value of trillions, or even quadrillions, or more dollars a day. Accepting Scientology’s own monetary valuation of my utterances, the organization cheated me out of quintillions of dollars, or over a lifetime even sextillions of dollars, with its cruelly unfair peanuts “settlement” “payment.” For Scientology to purchase my rights, ability and utterances that the organization claims it purchased, it would have to pay me what my potential utterances are worth, sextillions.
any or all of these utterances. Scientology lawyer Wilson admits as much in an exchange between us in 1996, true and correct copies of the communications in which are appended hereto as Exhibit [E]. On October 7, 1996, I wrote by e-mail to all the Council Members of the Los Angeles City Council concerning the decision to rename an LA street “L. Ron Hubbard Way.” On October 23 Mr. Wilson wrote me threatening that my letter to the LA City Council constituted a violation of the Thomas injunction. On November 7/11 I wrote back to Mr. Wilson, and on December 11 he sent me a letter stating “the impact of [my] letter was negligible at best, more likely nil. Pursuit of further remedy thus is unnecessary.” It is clearly impossible to explain logically how a four page letter e-mailed to all the LA City Council Members, along with the twenty-seven page Decision in Scientology v. Armstrong, LA Superior Court Case No. C 420153, has a value of “negligible at best, more likely nil,” and my minuscule comment that is virtually unrelated to Scientology “I'll say $1,500,000. That's my figure.” is worth $50,000.00. The LA Court Decision, a true and correct copy of which is appended hereto as Exhibit [F], and which was affirmed on appeal, condemns Fair Game and Scientology’s Fair Game attacks on me and others.
“contractual” conditions by which Scientology unlawfully sought to deprive me of my rights and privileges secured to me by the U.S. Constitution and laws.
Scientology, however, has unclean hands in this matter, having engineered the dismissal of my appeal by unlawful means and with the abetment of Marin Judge Gary Thomas.
21. On January 23, 1997 I was served with a subpoena for production of documents by defendant Grady Ward in the case of Religious Technology Center v. Ward, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Case No. C-96-20207 RMW. A true and correct copy of the subpoena is appended hereto as Exhibit [G]. On January 24, 1997 I received a fax letter from attorney Wilson stating that the documents that Ward sought were “within the purview of the December 6, 1986 Settlement Agreement and, hence, the various interlocutory orders and judgment in [ ] Marin Superior Court No. 157 680,” insisting that I refrain from producing the subpoenaed documents before a motion could be heard, and claiming that Scientology’s “contract” “requires no less.” A true and correct copy of Wilson’s letter is appended hereto as Exhibit [H]. I took this letter from Wilson, who did not advise Ward of what was happening, to be a threat and an improper tampering with a subpoenaed witness. I wrote a declaration, a true an correct copy of the relevant pages from which are appended hereto as Exhibit [I], that I executed January 26, 1997 and sent to the U.S. District Court Judge presiding over the Ward case to advise him of the threat from Wilson.
and why the "settlement agreement" and the Thomas order are illegal. Mr. Ward does not have the time to wait for my testimony until Scientology's motion for protective order is heard before he must file this testimony. In my opinion, that is precisely why Mr. Wilson has sent his threat letter. Ex. I, 43:13-26.
dereliction of duty in signing Scientology’s contempt order he acted to deprive me of my rights and privileges secured to me by the U.S. Constitution and laws in violation of 18 U.S.C. §242.
24. After getting Judge Thomas to sign the unlawful contempt order (Ex. J) Scientology then used this order to unlawfully get my appeal from the injunction and judgment of the Marin Superior Court dismissed. Using Judge Thomas’s unlawful contempt order, attorney Wilson insisted, on behalf of Scientology, that I was not entitled to maintain my appeal because of the fugitive disentitlement doctrine. Scientology’s and Wilson’s engineering of the dismissal of my appeal constitutes a series of acts in furtherance of crimes under 18 U.S.C. §241.
25. I have pled in my answer to Scientology’s complaint forty-four affirmative defenses. Wilson Decl. Ex B. Scientology did not file a demurrer or a motion to strike any of my defenses in this case. Scientology has not provided any evidence in its motion for summary judgment that there is no merit to all or any of my affirmative defenses, has not disposed of any or all of these defenses, or even identified the forty-four affirmative defenses for potential disposal.
defense, is completely missing from Scientology’s moving papers. In fact, Judge Thomas’s refusal to deal with the religious issue and the free religious exercise defense, when these were squarely and voluminously before him in my oppositions to Scientology’s earlier summary adjudication and summary judgment motions, is compelling evidence of judicial malfeasance.
Scientology and me in the past twenty-two years, and what has happened in this Court in the litigations between Scientology and me in the past twelve years, constitutes another criminal act in violation of 18 U.S.C. §241.
28. I am a Christian, Scientology is antichristian, and I have a ministry that involves defending Christianity and Christians from Scientology predations and fraud. I am a Prophet to Scientologists who brings them God’s Word as directed. I am the founder and head of the Church of Wogs (CoW) ® which is a global faith dedicated to protecting wogs from Scientology defamation and persecution. “Wogs” is the term Scientologists use for non-Scientologists, and is a racial epithet both inside and outside Scientology equivalent to “niggers.” I am a wog. My utterances about Scientology and wogs constitute religious scripture. Scientology has said nothing about any of these material facts and the defense of freedom of religion in which they are elements. See, regarding these facts and defense, e.g., my declaration executed January 9, 2001 a true and correct copy of which is appended hereto as Exhibit [K]. Scientology includes my OSC re contempt opposition that this declaration is in support of as Wilson Decl. Ex. I.
Scientology’s efforts to prevent me from assisting or associating with my own people and class against being beastified, attacked, menaced and obliterated constitutes an obvious violation of 18 U.S.C. §242.
30. Judge Thomas ruled on summary adjudication in 1995 that the subject “contract” is lawful and enforceable. The Judge signed Scientology’s injunction enforcing the conditions that deprive me of a great number of my rights and privileges secured to me by the U.S. Constitution and laws. In signing the injunction that unlawfully deprives me of these rights and privileges, Judge Thomas ignored and refused to deal with valid affirmative defenses, e.g., religion, and ignored or perverted clear evidence of duress, fraud and the unreasonableness and unenforceability of the liquidated damages condition. I have alleged, with a great amount of supporting evidence, in my Complaint Report to the Department of Justice, and herein state again, that Judge Thomas violated 18 U.S.C. §242 with his various orders in this case. We have over eight years of experience and evidence for interpreting the injunction and Judge Thomas’s other orders and their results and effects on me, others and justice. There exists an obvious triable issue as to the lawfulness of the injunction and other orders of Judge Thomas on which Scientology bases its motion for summary judgment.
cut off my employer’s communications, funds and connections, to deprive my employer of advantages and power, to raid and harass my employer, and to obliterate my employer. I have a legal duty therefore to disclose my knowledge of Scientology, my experiences, my beliefs and anything else that would explain what the threat Scientology is and would be to any potential employer. Even to get welfare, I must send out my resume to all sorts of companies disclosing my knowledge of the threat to them that Scientology would be if any person or company hired me.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of California, the U.S.A. and Canada that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed this 2nd day of March 2004 in Chilliwack, B.C., Canada.

References: v. 
 v. 
 §242
 §241
 §241
 §242
 §242