Source: https://www.ohlaborlaw.com/current-class-collective-actions/
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 11:58:15+00:00

Document:
"This not only helped me but thousands of other people who were being taken advantage of." - Sherry M.
Most of the wage law cases we handle at Nilges Draher LLC involve class actions and collective actions. This means that the employer has an illegal pay practice that applies to a group of similarly situated employees who have collectively acted against their employer.
We have earned the respect of our adversaries and of the courts as "abled and experienced counsel" in these types of cases. We have been successful in resolving many of these cases before filing a lawsuit. That's because our adversaries take us seriously.
Adams v. Frontier Railroad Services, LLC: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of workers who were allegedly not paid for time spent traveling to jobsites in which an overnight stay was required. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. If you worked for this company within the last three years and were not paid for your time spent driving to jobsites in which an overnight stay was required, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Al-Sabur v. Alliance Data Systems, Inc.: Our firm and the Coffman Legal law firm represent a class of current and former hourly, non-exempt employees who: (1) worked for Alliance Data Systems, Inc.’s Alliance Data Card Services line of business; (2) received bonus payments and shift differentials; and (3) worked overtime. This class of workers allege that the Defendant failed to include bonus payments and shift differentials in its employees’ regular rate of pay for purposes of computing overtime compensation. This class of workers allege that this failure resulted in the Defendant underpaying its employees overtime compensation. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
Baldwin, Lori v. Snap On Business Solutions: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of call center workers who allege that they were not paid for all of their hours worked, including but not limited to, powering up and shutting down their computers, logging in and out of their computers, and opening and closing multiple applications at the beginning and end of their workdays. This case is filed in the US District Court, for the Northern District of Ohio. If you worked as a call center employee for this company, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Blair v. Kelchner, Inc.: Our firm represents a class of current and former hourly non-exempt employees who allege that they were not paid for time spent traveling to jobsites in which an overnight stay was required. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division.
Campbell v. Wise Medical Staffing: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of home health workers who were denied travel time pay, which the workers allege resulted in unpaid overtime. Specifically, these workers allege that such they are not paid for the time spent traveling between client’s homes throughout the day. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. If you worked for this company as a home health worker, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Carswell v U.S. Cable Corporation of Tampa, et al.: Our firm and the Lazzaro Law Firm represent a class of current and former cable installers who allege that they were denied overtime pay. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
Davis v. Summit Racing: Our firm and the Lazzaro Law Firm are seeking to represent a class of current and former call center employees who allege that they were not paid for certain pre-shift work, including but not limited to, booting up and logging into Defendant’s computer systems. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. If you worked for this company as a call center employee, contact us to see if you qualify to joint this case.
Gueirro v. Sources Providers, Inc.: Our firm represents a class of current and former hourly non-exempt employees who received bonus payments and who worked overtime. This class of workers allege that the Defendant failed to include bonus payments in its employees’ regular rate of pay for purposes of computing overtime compensation. This class of workers allege that this failure resulted in the Defendant underpaying its employees overtime compensation. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
Hamilton v. INFI LLC, et al: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of field technicians who were allegedly misclassified as independent contractors and were paid no overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. If you worked for this company as a field technician in the last three years, and were not paid overtime compensation, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Jozwiak v. Cuyahoga County: Our firm represents a class of Cuyahoga County Corrections Officers who allege that they were not paid for certain pre-shift and post-shift work. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
Kasiotis v. AWP, Inc. d/b/a Area Wide Protective: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of traffic control specialists who allege that they were not paid all overtime compensation earned, resulting from unpaid time spent performing pre/post shift work, including transporting other employees, tools, and equipment to and from worksites and meeting locations; performing vehicle safety inspections, and refueling company vehicles. This case is filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. If you worked for this company and were not paid for time spent performing these types of pre/post shift work, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Kozina v. AIS Commercial Parts & Service: Our firm represents a class of current and former hourly office employees of AIS Commercial Parts & Service, Inc. who allege that AIS deducted an hour for a lunch break, even though they did not take an hour lunch break. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
Lambert v. G Matss, LLC: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of employees who allege that they were denied overtime compensation when they worked at various hotels and rental properties in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and Virginia, including, but possibly not limited to: Boardwalk Seaport Hotel, Days Inn, Econo Lodge, and Motel 6, in Seaside Heights, New Jersey; Various rentals identified as Beach House Rentals HC-55 Hause, HC-121 Haus, and 127 Carteret Haus (Jersey Shore), in Seaside Heights, New Jersey; Days Inn, in Lancaster, Pennsylvania; Days Inn, in Lebanon, Pennsylvania; Hampton Inn, in Manheim, Pennsylvania; Ramada Hotel of Philadelphia in Levittown, Pennsylvania; and Holiday Inn Express in South Boston, Virginia. Named defendants include Jariwala & Co., LLC, d/b/a J & CO. Hotels Group, G Matss, LLC, RHR 121, LLC, Boardwalk Seaport Inn, C Z Gabheraj LLC, Cgabheraj LLC, Raj Jariwala a/k/a Rajan Jariwala, Gaurang Jariwala a/k/a Greg Jariwala, Rex Jariwala, Ram Pal, and Ahmed Al Haddad. This case is filed in the United States District Court of New Jersey. If you worked for any of these companies and were denied overtime, contact us to see if you qualify to join the case.
Langston v. U.S. Security Associates: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of current and former hourly, non-exempt security guards who were allegedly required to report to work 15 minutes before the start of their shift to receive a “pass-down” report without pay. This case is filed in the Western District of Oklahoma. If you worked for this company as an hourly security guard, and were required to report to work 15 minutes before the start of your shift without pay, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Lewis v. Sentry Electrical Group, Inc.: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of workers who were allegedly not paid for time spent traveling to jobsites in which an overnight stay was required. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. If you worked for this company within the last three years and were not paid for your time spent driving to jobsites in which an overnight stay was required, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Long v. Prestige: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of techs who were allegedly paid “tech time” instead of lawful overtime wages of one and one-half times their regular rates for hours worked in excess of 40 in a workweek. Tech time was not counted towards all hours worked, so this resulted in a further underpayment of overtime. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. If you worked for this company as a tech in the last three years, and were paid “tech time”, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
McBride v. Amerathon, LLC: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of current and former hourly Mobile Phlebotomists who allege that they were not paid overtime compensation for hours worked in excess of 40 per workweek and/or who were not paid for the time they spent traveling during their workdays. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. If you worked for this company as a Mobile Phlebotomist, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Meyers v. Boomerang Rubber, Inc.: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of hourly employees who received additional remuneration, including shift differential, that was not included into overtime calculations, and who performed post-shift off-the-clock work, which resulted in the underpayment of overtime. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. If you worked for this company as an hourly employee in the last three years and were paid shift differentials or any other additional pay, and/or performed work after clocking out, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Neville v. Nelson Tree: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of workers who were allegedly not paid for time spent traveling to jobsites in which an overnight stay was required. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. If you worked for this company within the last three years and were not paid for your time spent driving to jobsites in which an overnight stay was required, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Rice v. Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District: Our firm represents a class of former and current hourly non-exempt employees of the Northeast Ohio Regional Sewer District who worked as a Security Officer. This class of employees allege that they were not paid for certain pre-shift duties. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.
Riley v. Meteor Ceiling Systems: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of non-exempt, hourly employees who allege that they were not paid all of their overtime compensation and/or were paid their overtime compensation at the wrong rate. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. If you worked for this company, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Seldomridge v. Fifth Third Bank: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of non-exempt Service to Solutions employees, and those working in other call center positions, who allege that they were not paid all overtime compensation resulting from unpaid time spent starting and logging into Defendant’s computer and phone systems and applications and reviewing emails. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division. If you worked for this company, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Slaughter v. The Lincoln Electric Company: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of current and former non-exempt employees who allege that they were denied overtime payments and/or were underpaid overtime compensation. Specifically, the Named Plaintiff alleges, among other things, that he was not paid for the time he spent putting on and taking off his personal protective clothing and equipment. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. If you worked for this company and were required to take on and off protective clothing and equipment before and after your shift, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Smith v. CHS Employment Services, LLC: Our firm and the Coffman Legal law firm are seeking to represent a class of current and former hourly non-exempt employees who allege that they received bonus payments for working hours or days outside of their scheduled shift times. This class of workers allege that they were underpaid overtime compensation. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. If you worked for this company, received bonus payments and worked overtime, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Smith v. Hillstone Healthcare, Inc., et al.: Our firm and the Coffman Legal law firm are seeking to represent a class of current and former hourly non-exempt employees who allege that they received bonus payments for working hours or days outside of their scheduled shift times. This class of workers allege that they were underpaid overtime compensation. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. If you worked for this company, received bonus payments and worked overtime, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Still v. Belmont Confections, Inc.: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of non-exempt, hourly employees who allege that they were not paid for pre-shift washing and donning of safety equipment. Some employees may have been employed directly by Belmont, or jointly by Belmont and temporary staffing companies, such as People Ready. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. If you worked at Belmont Confections, and were not paid for your pre-shift washing and donning of safety equipment, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Townsend v. Stand Up Management: Our firm is seeking to represent a class of employees for claims of unpaid minimum wages and overtime. The lawsuit alleges that this class of employees performed non-exempt work but were not paid overtime compensation and/or a minimum wage in workweeks during the last three years. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. If you worked for these companies, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Walton v. Oldcastle Building Envelope, Inc.: Our firm and the Coffman Legal law firm is seeking to represent a class of hourly, non-exempt employees who allege that Oldcastle had a companywide policy of improperly rounding hourly employees’ start and stop times, which resulted in unpaid overtime. These employees also allege that they were not paid for time spent putting on protective clothing before the start of their shifts. This case is filed in the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division. If you worked for this company within the last three years as an hourly employee, contact us to see if you qualify to join this case.
Younge v. Huntington National Bank: Our firm represents a group of hourly employees who handled inbound calls allege that they were not paid for time they spent starting, booting up and logging into Huntington’s computer systems, software applications and/or phone systems and/or reviewing emails and memoranda prior to clocking in at the beginning of their shift. This case is filed in the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.