Source: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/1872/3520
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 16:55:43+00:00

Document:
Abstract: The article considers current policy trends and academic controversies related to qualitative data preservation and re-use. In the first part of the article, the epistemological/methodological, ethical/legal, ideological/political, and practical/technical aspects of the ongoing British debate about data archiving and re-use are presented and commented. In the second part, the Swedish case is briefly described and considered in light of the academic concerns that have been raised by the British debate. The situation in Sweden may be summarized in three points: First, there are many signs that the infrastructure for qualitative data archiving and re-use is being developed without the active participation of sufficient representatives of the qualitative research community; second, there are many signs that developing the infrastructure takes as a point of departure neo-positivistic or foundational epistemology, treating qualitative data in the same way as quantitative data, with all the methodological problems resulting from this; and third there are very few, if any, signs that serious academic debate has started in relation to all the issues that have been raised by the corresponding debate in Britain.
Only 11% of the professors and 1% of the PhD students were familiar with the document.
50% of the professors had heard about it but not in detail.
There are many signs that the infrastructure for qualitative data archiving and re-use is being developed without the active participation of sufficient representatives of the qualitative research community.
There are many signs that developing the infrastructure takes as a point of departure neo-positivistic or foundational epistemology, treating qualitative data in the same way as quantitative data, with all the methodological problems resulting from this.
Atkinson, Paul (2005). Qualitative research—Unity and diversity. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 26, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503261 [Accessed: February 17, 2013].
Axelsson, Ann-Sofie & Carlhed, Carina (2009). Next generation e-researchers: Doctoral students in social sciences and humanities in Sweden and their attitudes towards open access and open repositories. Paper presented at NCeSS National Centre for e-Social Science, the 5th International Conference on e-Social Science, Cologne, Germany, June 24-26, 2009, http://mdh.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:279972 [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Bishop, Libby (2009). Ethical sharing and re-use of qualitative data. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 44(3), 255-272, http://www.data-archive.ac.uk/media/249157/ajsi44bishop.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Carlhed, Carina & Alfredsson, Iris (2009). Swedish National Data Service's strategy for sharing and mediating data: Practices of open access to and reuse of research data—The state of the art in Sweden 2009. IASSIST's 35th Annual Conference, May 26-29, 2009, Tampere, Finland, http://mdh.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2:279976 [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Cheshire, Lynda (2009). Archiving qualitative data: Prospects and challenges of data preservation and sharing among Australian qualitative researchers. Discussion Paper, The Australian Qualitative Archive (AQuA), Institute for Social Science Research, The University of Queensland, http://www.assda.edu.au/forms/AQuAQualitativeArchiving_DiscussionPaper_FinalNov09.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Cheshire, Lynda; Broom, Alex & Emmison, Michael (2009). Archiving qualitative data in Australia: An introduction. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 44(3), 239-254.
Coltart, Carrie & Henwood, Karen (2012). On paternal subjectivity: A qualitative longitudinal and psychosocial case analysis of men's classed positions and transitions to first-time fatherhood. Qualitative Research, 12(1), 35-52.
Coltart, Carrie; Henwood, Karen & Shirani, Fiona (2013). Qualitative secondary analysis in austere times: Ethical, professional and methodological considerations. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14(1), Art. 18, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1301181 [Accessed: February 17, 2013].
Corti, Louise (2011). The European landscape of qualitative social research archives: Methodological and practical issues. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Art. 11, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103117 [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Corti, Louise & Backhouse, Gill (2005). Acquiring qualitative data for secondary analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art. 36, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502361 [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Corti, Louise; Day, Annette & Backhouse, Gill (2000). Confidentiality and informed consent: Issues for consideration in the preservation of and provision of access to qualitative data archives. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(3), Art. 7, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs000372 [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Cribier, Francoise (2005). The value of qualitative data and their archiving: The French situation. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art. 35, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502357 [Accessed: February 18, 2013].
Denzin, Norman K. (2009). The elephant in the living room: Or extending the conversation about the politics of evidence. Qualitative Research, 9, 139-160.
Elman, Colin; Kapiszewski, Diana & Vinuela, Lorena (2010). Qualitative data archiving: Rewards and challenges. PS: Political Science & Politics, 43(1), 23-27.
Fielding, Nigel (2004). Getting the most from archived qualitative data: Epistemological, practical and professional obstacles. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 7(1), 97-104.
Fry, Jenny; Lockyer, Suzanne; Oppenheim, Charles; Houghton, John & Rasmussen, Bruce (2008). Identifying benefits arising from the curation and open sharing of research data produced by UK higher education and research institutes. Department of Information Science, Loughborough University and Centre for Strategic Economic Studies, Victoria University, Melbourne, http://repository.jisc.ac.uk/279/2/JISC_data_sharing_finalreport.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Griffin, Christine (1997). Archiving qualitative datasets: Social research and the politics of control. Radical Statistics, 66, 44-47, http://www.radstats.org.uk/no066/griffin.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Grinyer, Anne (2002). The anonymity of research participants: Assumptions, ethics and practicalities. Social Research Update, 36, http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU36.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Gustafsson, Bengt; Hermerén, Göran & Petersson, Bo (2006). Good research practice—What is it? Views, guidelines and examples. Vetenskapsrådets Rapportserie, 1, Stockholm, http://www.vr.se/download/18.6b2f98a910b3e260ae28000469/Good+Research+Practice+20+april.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Hadfield, Lucy (2010). Balancing on the edge of the archive: The researcher's role in collecting and preparing data for deposit. In Fiona Shirani & Susie Weller (Eds.), Conducting qualitative longitudinal research: Fieldwork experiences (Vol. 2, pp.60-73), http://www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/WP2-final-Jan-2010.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Hammersley, Martyn (1997). Qualitative data archiving: Some reflections on its prospects and problems. Sociology, 31(1), 131-142.
Holland, Janet (2011). Timescapes: Living a qualitative longitudinal study. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Art. 9, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs110392 [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Kuula, Arja & Borg, Sami (2008). Open access to and reuse of research data—The state of the art in Finland. Finish Social Science Data Archive, 7, http://www.fsd.uta.fi/fi/julkaisut/julkaisusarja/FSDjs07_OECD_en.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Lawton, Julia (2001). Gaining and maintaining consent: Ethical concerns raised in a study of dying patients. Qualitative Health Research, 11(5), 693-705.
Lejeune, Phillipe (2011). The story of a French life-writing archive: Association pour l'autobiographie et le patrimoine autobiographique. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Art. 7, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs110371 [Accessed: February 18, 2013].
Maheux, Jean-Francois & Roth, Wolff-Michael (2012). The ethical significance of (mathematically) engaging with students and teachers while collecting qualitative data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(3), Art. 11, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1203115 [Accessed: February 17, 2013].
Mauthner, Natasha S. & Doucet, Andrea (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413-431, http://www.andreadoucet.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Mauthner-Doucet-Reflexive-Accounts.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Mauthner, Natasha S. & Doucet, Andrea (2008). Knowledge once divided can be hard to put together again. Sociology, 42(5), 971-985, http://www.andreadoucet.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/Mauthner-Doucet-2008-Knowledge-Divided.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Mauthner, Natasha S. & Parry, Odette (2009). Qualitative data preservation and sharing in the social sciences: On whose philosophical terms? Australian Journal of Social Issues, 44(3), 291-307.
Mauthner, Natasha S.; Parry, Odette & Backett-Milburn, Kathryn (1998). The data are out there, or are they? Implications for archiving and revisiting qualitative data. Sociology, 32(4), 733-745, http://www.slis.indiana.edu/faculty/hrosenba/www/Research/methods/mauthner_archive-qual.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Medjedović, Irena (2011). Secondary analysis of qualitative interview data: Objections and experiences. Results of a German feasibility study. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Art. 10, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103104 [Accessed: February 18, 2013].
Moore, Niamh (2007). (Re)Using qualitative data? Sociological Research Online, 12(3), http://socresonline.org.uk/12/3/1.html [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Mruck, Katja (2005). Providing (online) resources and services for qualitative researchers: Challenges and potentials. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art. 38, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502388 [Accessed: February 18, 2013].
Neale, Bren (2006). Changing relationships and identities trough the life course—Study overview: Timescapes—An ESRC qualitative longitudinal study, http://www.timescapes.leeds.ac.uk/assets/files/TIMESCAPES_Blueprint.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Neale, Bren & Bishop, Libby (2012). The Timescapes archive: A stakeholder approach to archiving qualitative longitudinal data. Qualitative Research, 12(1), 53-65.
Opitz, Diana & Witzel, Andreas (2005). The concept and architecture of the Bremen Life Course Archive. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Art. 37, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0502370 [Accessed: February 18, 2013].
Parry, Odette & Mauthner, Natasha S. (2004). Whose data are they anyway? Practical, legal and ethical issues in archiving qualitative research data. Sociology, 38(1), 139-152.
Parry, Odette & Mauthner, Natasha S. (2005). Back to basics: Who re-uses qualitative data and why?. Sociology, 39(2), 337-342.
Sánchez-Carretero, Cristina; Cea, Antonio; Diaz-Mas, Paloma; Martinez, Pilar & Ortiz, Carmen (2011). On blurred borders and interdisciplinary research teams: The case of the "Archive of Mourning". Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Art. 12, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103124 [Accessed: February 18, 2013].
Schubotz, Dirk; Melaugh, Martin & McLoughlin, Peter (2011). Archiving qualitative data in the context of a society coming out of conflict: Some lessons from Northern Ireland. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Art. 13, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103133 [Accessed: February 18, 2013].
Silverman, David (2005). Instances or sequences? Improving the state of the art of qualitative research. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), Art. 30, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0503301 [Accessed: February 17, 2013].
Smioski, Andrea (2011). Archiving qualitative data: Infrastructure, acquisition, documentation, distribution. Experiences from WISDOM, the Austrian data archive. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Art. 18, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1103181 [Accessed: February 18, 2013].
Svensk författningssamling (1998). Personuppgiftslag 1998:204. Regeringskansliet / Lagrummet, http://www.riksdagen.se/sv/Dokument-Lagar/Lagar/Svenskforfattningssamling/Personuppgiftslag-1998204_sfs-1998-204/?bet=1998:204 [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Tolhurst, Edward (2012). Grounded theory method: Sociology's quest for exclusive items of inquiry. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 13(3), Art. 26, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs1203261 [Accessed: February 17, 2013].
Travers, Max (2009). A not so strange silence: Why qualitative research should respond critically to the qualitative data archive. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 44(3), 273-289.
Valles, Miguel S. (2011). Archival and biographical research sensitivity: A European perspective from Spain. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(3), Art. 2, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs110327 [Accessed: February 18, 2013].
Van den Berg, Harry (2005). Reanalyzing qualitative interviews from different angels: The risk of decontextualization and other problems of sharing qualitative data. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(1), Art 30, http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0501305 [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Vetenskapsrådet (2006). Vetenskapsrådets guide till infrastrukturen. En kartläggning och rekommendationer för svenska forskares tillgång till forskningsinfrastruktur på lång sikt. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie, 14, Stockholm, http://www.vr.se/download/18.7bea596910e36c19cbc80001735/Rapport+14.2006.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Vetenskapsrådet (2008). The Swedish Research Council's guide to infrastructure. Recommendations on long-term research infrastructures by the research councils and VINOVA. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie, 5, Stockholm, http://www.vr.se/download/18.76ac7139118ccc2078b800011940/Rapport+5.2008.pdf [Accessed: February 15, 2013].
Walters, Peter (2009). Qualitative archiving: Engaging with epistemological misgivings. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 44(3), 309-320.
Zoran SLAVNIC is a sociologist and researcher at the Institute for Research on Migration, Ethnicity and Society (REMESO), Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Linkoping University, Sweden. His main research interests are ethnic entrepreneurship, informal economy as well as sociological theory and methodology of social sciences.

References: Art. 26
 Art. 18
 Art. 11
 Art. 36
 Art. 7
 Art. 35
 Art. 9
 Art. 7
 Art. 11
 Art. 10
 Art. 38
 Art. 37
 Art. 12
 Art. 13
 Art. 30
 Art. 18
 Art. 26
 Art. 2
 Art 30