Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US10133783B2/en
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 16:36:45+00:00

Document:
Systems and methods are provided for performing constraint driven database searching. At least one constraint is received for a search of one or more databases comprising one or more datasets, each comprising multiple entry fields. The one or more databases comprising the one or more datasets may be accessed and searched based on the constraint to identify one or more dataset entries that contain the at least one constraint in one of multiple entry fields. A visual representation of the identified dataset entries may be provided to the user as results of the constraint driven database search. Additional constraints may be accepted to further narrow the results of constraint driven database search. The results may be exported and made accessible for later retrieval and/or cached for use in subsequent searches.
This disclosure relates to approaches for searching and creating datasets from one or more databases.
Under conventional approaches, database searching may be performed based on keyword queries. Keyword search queries performed across large and/or multiple databases may suffer from being time intensive. More targeted search queries limited to certain fields within a database may miss important results. Additionally, results from such searches may be confusing, difficult to interpret, and/or off-target. These and other drawbacks exist with conventional solutions.
Various embodiments of the present disclosure include systems, methods, and nontransitory computer readable media configured to perform constraint driven database searching. At least one constraint is received for a search of one or more databases comprising one or more datasets, each comprising multiple entry fields. The one or more databases comprising the one or more datasets may be accessed and searched based on the constraint to identify one or more dataset entries that contain the at least one constraint in one of multiple entry fields. A visual representation of the identified dataset entries may be provided to the user as results of the constraint driven database search.
In some embodiments, the systems, methods, and nontransitory computer readable media are configured to receive one or more additional constraints that further refine the search based on the one or more additional constraints.
In some embodiments, the systems, methods, and nontransitory computer readable media are configured to receive one or more additional constraints that modify the visual representation of previously identified dataset entries and cause additional dataset entries to be identified.
In some embodiments, the systems, methods, and nontransitory computer readable media are configured to compare the field type for the dataset field of the one or more identified dataset entries in which the constraint was identified in order to determine the appropriate arrangement of the visual representation of the identified dataset entries.
In some embodiments, the systems, methods, and nontransitory computer readable media are configured to assign values to the types of entry fields in which the constraints were found in order to determine the entry field most suitable for the constraint in the visual representation of the identified dataset entries.
In some embodiments, the systems, methods, and nontransitory computer readable media are configured to update the visual representation of the identified dataset entries based on additional constraints provided by a user.
In some embodiments, the systems, methods, and nontransitory computer readable media are configured to determine whether the constraint has already been searched based on a cached dataset associated with the constraint and utilize the cached dataset to identify one or more dataset entries that contain the constraint.
In some embodiments, the systems, methods, and nontransitory computer readable media are configured to import one or more databases and/or one or more datasets identified by a user into a search and/or incorporate the identified one or more databases and/or one or more datasets into a visual representation of the results of a constraint search.
These and other features of the systems, methods, and non-transitory computer readable media are disclosed herein, as well as the methods of operation and functions of the related elements of structure and the combination of parts and economies of manufacture, will become more apparent upon consideration of the following description and the appended claims with reference to the accompanying drawings, all of which form a part of this specification, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding parts in the various figures. It is to be expressly understood, however, that the drawings are for purposes of illustration and description only and are not intended as a definition of the limits of the invention(s).
FIG. 1 depicts a diagram of an example of a system for performing constraint driven database searching, in accordance with various embodiments.
FIG. 2 depicts a diagram of an example of a constraint driven database search engine, in accordance with various embodiments.
FIGS. 3A-B depicts exemplary interfaces presented to a user for conducting constraint driven database searching and viewing the results thereof, in accordance with various embodiments.
FIG. 4 depicts a flowchart of an example method for performing constraint driven database searching, in accordance with various embodiments.
FIG. 5 depicts a block diagram of an example computer system in which any of the embodiments described herein may be implemented.
A claimed solution rooted in computer technology overcomes problems specifically arising in the realm of computer technology. In various implementations, a computing system is configured to provide tools that facilitate constraint driven database searching. In an implementation, a user may provide the system with a constraint. The system may access multiple databases to identify databases with data entries corresponding to the constraint. The system may accept additional constraints to narrow the identified databases and entries. The system may provide access to the identified databases for further analysis.
It will be appreciated by those having skill in the art that the implementations described herein may be practiced without these specific details or with an equivalent arrangement. In other instances, well-known structures and devices are shown in block diagram form to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the implementations.
FIG. 1 depicts a diagram of an example environment 100 for performing constraint driven database searching, in accordance with various embodiments. As shown in FIG. 1, the example environment 100 can include at least one computing system 102 that includes one or more processors 104 and memory 106. The memory 106 may be non-transitory and computer-readable. The memory 106 may store instructions that, when executed by the one or more processors 104, cause the one or more processors 104 to perform various operations described herein. The environment 100 may also include a computing device 110 that is able to communicate with the system 102 (e.g., over one or more computer networks) and a data store 108 that is accessible to the system 102. For example, the data store 108 may include one or more searchable databases, each containing one or more searchable datasets containing multiple entry fields.
In some embodiments, the system 102 and the computing device 110 may be integrated in a single device or system. Alternatively, the system 102 and the computing device 110 may be individual computing devices. For example, the computing device 110 may be a mobile device and the system 102 may be a computing server. The data store 108 may be accessible to the system 102, for example, through the memory 106, another device coupled to the system 102, cloud-based storage, etc. Various operations that are capable of being performed by the system 102 are described below in reference to FIGS. 2-4.
FIG. 2 depicts a diagram 200 of an example of a constraint driven database search engine 202, in accordance with various embodiments. In various embodiments, functionality of the constraint driven database search engine 202 may be performed by one or more servers, workstations, desktop computers, laptop computers, mobile devices, and/or other computing devices. In some embodiments, functionality of the constraint driven database search engine 202 may be performed by computing system 102. For example, the components of constraint driven database search engine 202 may comprise computer-readable instructions executable by processors 104. The components of constraint driven database search engine 202 may comprise search component 204, results component 206, display component 208, recommendation component 210, caching component 212, import/export component 214, and/or other computer program components. As used herein, for convenience, the various components of constraint driven database search engine 202 will be described as performing an operation, when, in fact, the various components comprise instructions which may program the processors 104 (and therefore computing system 102) to perform the operation.
Search component 204 may be configured to search one or more databases comprising one or more datasets based on constraints. For example, the constraints may be provided by a user. The one or more constraints may be received by computing device 110 as input from a user. The one or more constraints may comprise a text string of one or more letters, numbers, words, and/or other textual input. In some implementations, the one or more constraints may be automatically identified (i.e., without input from the user). In various implementations, search component 204 may be configured to search across one or more databases to identify all dataset entries that contain a constraint in at least one entry field of the multiple entry fields for each dataset entry. In some implementations, search component 204 may be configured to further search, from the identified dataset entries containing a first set of one or more constraints, for one or more dataset entries that contain one or more additional constraints.
In various implementations, search component 204 may be configured to refine a search for a constraint based on one or more other constraints searched. For example, search component 204 may be configured to refine a previous search in response to a subsequent search conducted based on one or more other constraints. For example, and referring to FIG. 3A, if the cell that received constraint 304 was in the same row as the cell that received constraint 302, the search for constraint 302 may be further limited by constraint 304, and identified dataset entries would need to contain constraint 302 in one dataset entry field and constraint 304 in another dataset entry field. As such, search component 204 may further search all the identified dataset entries containing constraint 302 and identify all the dataset entries that contained constraint 302 that also contain constraint 304.
In various implementations, search component 204 may be configured to build on previous searches by searching one or more databases and/or one or more datasets of one or more databases and identify dataset entries that contain additional constraints. For example, search component 204 may be configured to search across one or more databases to identify all additional dataset entries that contain a second constraint in at least one entry field of the multiple entry fields for each dataset entry. Search component 204 may be configured to identify all dataset entries that contain either constraint 302 or constraint 304.
In various implementations, search component 204 may be configured to limit a search to selected databases and/or selected datasets. For example, search component 204 may be configured to limit a search to one or more databases and/or one or more datasets identified by a user. In some implementations, search component 204 may be configured to limit a search to one or more databases. For example, search component 204 may be configured to limit a search to one or more datasets and/or databases identified by a user and/or one or more datasets and/or databases to which a user conducting a search has been granted access by an administrator. In various implementations, search component 204 may be configured to search additional databases and/or additional datasets imported by import/export component 214.
Search component 204 may be configured to predict associations (i.e., a join) between identified dataset entries in one or more datasets and/or databases. For example, each dataset entry may correspond to a row in a dataset. In various implementations, search component be configured predict a join between individual rows in one or more datasets. A join may indicate that a first row in a first dataset is related to a second row in a second dataset. For example, a first dataset may relate to employees of a company (i.e., an employee directory). A row in the first dataset may relate to an employee named “John Smith.” The first row may include values in one or more columns. Each column may correspond to a property defined by that dataset. For example, each column may correspond to a property such as office location, position, salary, and/or other attribute of an employee. A second dataset may relate to individuals who have signed up to receive newsletter (i.e., a mailing list). A row in the second dataset may also relate to “John Smith” and include values in one or more columns of the dataset. The columns in the second dataset may correspond to different properties than those included in the first dataset. Search component 204 may be configured to determine that the row (i.e., dataset entry) in the first dataset corresponding to “John Smith” relates to the row in the second dataset corresponding to “John Smith.” For example, search component 204 may be configured to determine that the row in the first dataset and the row in the second dataset are associated, share similar properties, describe the same subject, and/or are otherwise related. In various implementations, search component may be configured to predict joins between datasets once one or more dataset entries are identified based on one or more constraints. As such, the system may be able to suggest additional data (i.e., properties) to provide for an identified dataset entry based on a predicted association with a dataset entry in a different dataset.
Search component 204 may be configured to predict that a first row in a first dataset is related to a second row in a second dataset. For example, search component 204 may be configured to predict one or more dataset entries from one or more different datasets and/or databases that are related to one or more dataset entries identified via a search conducted based on one or more constraints. In some implementations, the one or more related dataset entries may be identified based on shared values and/or field types (i.e., columns). Values and/or field types shared between dataset entries may indicate that one or more dataset entries are related. As an example, related dataset entries may correspond to the same person, place, item, event, and/or other object that is the subject of a dataset entry. In various implementations, search component 204 may be configured to search across the one or more datasets and/or databases to identify all dataset entries that may be associated with a dataset entry identified based on a constraint. In some implementations, search component 204 may be configured to predict the dataset entries that are related from among the identified dataset entries based on one or more prior searches conducted, one or more prior datasets created, and/or other user activity and/or feedback. In various implementations, related dataset entries and/or the dataset and/or database containing the related dataset entries may be presented to the user. For example, one or more values from a related dataset entry may be automatically populated in association with the identified dataset entry to which it relates. In some implementations, recommendation component 210 may be configured to recommend related dataset entries and/or the dataset and/or database containing the related dataset entries to the user. Upon receiving a selection indicating an intention to display the values from one or more related dataset entries, the related dataset entries themselves, and/or the dataset and/or database containing the related dataset entries within the results, the values from one or more related dataset entries, the related dataset entries themselves, and/or the dataset and/or database containing the related dataset entries may be displayed within the results.
Returning to FIG. 2, results component 206 may be configured to narrow the dataset entries identified by search component 204 based on the one or more received constraints and determine an appropriate arrangement of the identified dataset entries to be provided to the user. In various implementations, results component 206 may identify an entry field of a dataset entry that contains a constraint based on the one or more identified dataset entries containing one or more constraints. In various implementations, results component 206 may compare the identified entry fields and determine the appropriate entry fields to provide to a user.
For example, and referring to FIG. 3A, results component 206 may be configured to determine that, in the majority of identified dataset entries, or other threshold amount of identified dataset entries, constraint 302 appears in an entry field associated with “First Name.” As such, results component 206 may be configured to determine that the column associated with the constraint should be associated with First Name and that the appropriate arrangement of the identified dataset entries should comprise First Name and Last Name in close proximity based on an identified association between First Name and Last Name and/or a determination that First Name appears in close proximity to Last Name in a majority of datasets from which the dataset entries containing the constraint are identified.
Results component 206 may be configured to update a visual representation of identified dataset entries by determining how one or more dataset entries should appear based on values within one or more columns of the one or more dataset entries, the entry field type of one or more columns of the one or more dataset entries, the placement of a constraint within a row or column, and/or other aspects of the one or more dataset entries. In this manner, results component 206 may be configured to collapse one or more rows (or dataset entries) together based on shared properties of the one or more rows.
For example, and returning to FIG. 2, results component 206 may be configured to update a visual representation of identified dataset entries based on additional constraints provided by a user. For example, and referring to FIG. 3A, the identified dataset entries are provided with the first four dataset fields comprising, “First Name,” “Last Name,” “Email Address,” and “User ID.” If an additional constraint is received, results component 206 may modify the visual representation based on the constraint. For example, and referring to FIG. 3B, constraint 308 comprising “London, UK” is received. Upon receiving constraint 308, search component 204 may be configured to search across one or more databases to identify all dataset entries that contain constraint 308 (i.e., London, UK). For example, search component 204 may identify at least a third dataset entry from one or more databases for “Jane Doe” who is located in “London, UK” and who has a user ID of “3546.” In response to receiving constraint 308, results component 308 may be configured to modify the visual representation of the first dataset entry and the second dataset entry based on constraint 308.
In various implementations, results component 206 may be configured to determine an appropriate arrangement of the identified dataset entries to be provided to the user based on one or more constraints based on the type of the entry field in which the one or more constraints are found. For example, results component 206 may score the results of a constraint search based on the number of entries in which a constraint is found in each possible field type. For example, field types may include first name, a last name, a user identification, contact information, location, position, and/or other types of fields of the one or more datasets to be searched.
For example, and referring to FIG. 3B, if “London, UK” is found in “Office Location” or “Location” in nine dataset entries and “Name” in two dataset entries, results component 206 may determine that the appropriate arrangement of the dataset entries would comprise the column corresponding with the constraint to be “Office Location” or “Location” as opposed to “Name.” As such, results component 206 may assign scores to one or more identified entry fields to determine the entry field that best suits the results identified based on the constraints provided by the user.
Display component 208 may be configured to generate a visual representation of the results of a constraint search containing the dataset entries identified by search component 204 based on the appropriate arrangement of the identified dataset entries determined by results component 206. In some embodiments, the visual representation may be provided to the user via an interface presented to the user through a respective display screen of the computing device 112 and/or the system 102. For example, display component 208 may generate exemplary interface 300 depicted by FIGS. 3A-B. In some embodiments, the interfaces may be provided by a software application running on the computing device 112 and/or the system 102.
Display component 208 may be configured to generate a visual representation of one or more dataset entries identified by search component 204. In some implementations, display component 208 may be configured to generate a visual representation of only one dataset entry identified by search component 204 per constraint searched. In some implementations, display component 208 may be configured to generate a visual representation of every dataset entry identified by search component 204 for each constraint searched. In some implementations, display component 208 may be configured to generate a visual representation of less than all of the dataset entries identified by search component 204 and provide a visual depiction of the full number of dataset entries identified per constraint searched. For example, and referring to FIG. 3A, display component 208 may be configured to generate a visual representation comprising the dataset entry for “John Doe” in association with constraint 302 and the dataset entry for “John Smith” in association with constraint 304. Display component 208 may be configured to provide visual indicators 306, which comprise a visual depiction of the full number of dataset entries identified for the search associated with constraint 302 and the full number of dataset entries identified for the search associated with constraint 304. For example, and referring to FIG. 3B, display component 208 may be configured to generate a visual representation comprising the dataset entry for “John Doe” in association with constraint 302, the dataset entry for “John Smith” in association with constraint 304, and the dataset entry for “Jane Doe” in association with constraint 306. Display component 208 may be configured to provide visual indicators 310, which comprise a visual depiction of the full number of dataset entries identified for the search associated with constraint 302, the full number of dataset entries identified for the search associated with constraint 304, and the full number of dataset entries identified for the search associated with constraint 306.
Recommendation component 210 may be configured to recommend one or more constraints for a search, one or more databases in which to search, and/or one or more datasets in which to search and/or add to a visual representation of results of a constraint search. In various implementations, recommendation component 210 may be configured to recommend one or more constraints, one or more databases, and/or one or more datasets based on previously entered constraints, results (e.g., identified dataset entries) from concurrently or previously performed searches, datasets cached by caching component 212, and/or other information available to constraint drive database search engine 202. In some implementations, recommendation component 210 may be configured to dynamically recommend one or more constraints, one or more databases, and/or one or more datasets as a user enters text via computing device 110. For example, one or more recommended constraints, one or more recommended databases, and/or one or more recommended datasets may appear below a text input as a user enters text via computing device 110. In various implementations, recommendation component 210 may be configured to cause recommended constraints, databases, and/or datasets to be provided to the user via an interface by display component 208. When one or more recommended constraints, databases, and/or datasets are selected by a user via computing device 110, the recommended one or more constraints, databases, and/or datasets may be included in the search of the one or more databases and/or one or more datasets by search component 204 and/or included in the visual representation of the results of a constraint search by display component 208.
Caching component 212 may be configured to cache identified dataset entries. For example, caching component 212 may be configured to cache identified dataset entries based on the constraints based on which they were identified. For example, caching component 212 may cache the results of a search based on the constraint “John.” If “John” is later used as a constraint in the search of the same or similar databases, caching component 212 may provide the identified dataset entries and/or an indication that the results are stored and accessible to results component 206. The cached results of previous constraint driven database searches may be used to reduce processing time when performing searches in one or more databases and/or one or more datasets.
Import/export component 214 may be configured to import one or more databases and/or one or more datasets of one or more databases into a search and/or incorporate one or more databases and/or one or more datasets into a visual representation of the results of a constraint search. Import/export component 214 may be configured to receive an identification of one or more databases or one or more datasets from a user. Import/export component 214 may be configured to provide instructions to search component 204 to include the identified one or more databases and/or the one or more datasets in the one or more databases comprising one or more datasets to be searched by search component 204 based on constraints provided by the user.
Import/export component 214 may be configured to export the results of a constraint search. In various implementations, import/export component 214 may be configured to export results of a constraint search in response to a user selection indicating an intent to export and/or share results of a constraint search. For example, import/export component 214 may be configured to generate a new dataset, for later retrieval and/or access, based on the results of the constraint search provided to the user and/or an abstract representation of the constraint search performed. An abstract representation of the constraint search performed may identify the constraints upon which the constraint search is based and/or the one or more databases/datasets included in the constraint search.
Import/export component 214 may be configured to export the results of a constraint search as both a dynamic dataset and a static dataset. In various implementations, import/export component 214 may be configured to export the results of a constraint search as a dynamic dataset. For example, import/export component 214 may be configured to export the results of a constraint search as a dynamic dataset that updates continuously, periodically, or upon access based on the constraints upon which the constraint search is based and/or the one or more databases and one or more datasets included in the constraint search and the results of the constraint search. In various implementations, import/export component 214 may be configured to export the results of a constraint search as a static dataset. For example, import/export component 214 may be configured to export the results of a constraint search as a static dataset containing the results of the constraint search as provided to the user.
FIG. 4 depicts a flowchart 400 of an example method for performing constraint driven database searching, in accordance with various embodiments. The operations of method 400 presented below are intended to be illustrative and, as such, should not be viewed as limiting. In some implementations, method 400 may be accomplished with one or more additional operations not described, and/or without one or more of the operations discussed. In some implementations, two or more of the operations may occur substantially simultaneously. The described operations may be accomplished using some or all of the system components described herein.
In an operation 402, method 400 may include obtaining access to a plurality of databases and/or a plurality of datasets of one or more databases. In various implementations, each entry within the plurality of databases and/or the plurality of datasets of one or more databases include multiple entry fields per entry.
In an operation 404, method 400 may include receiving at least one constraint provided by a user. Constraints may comprise a text string of one or more letters, numbers, words, and/or other textual input.
In an operation 406, method 400 may include identifying at least a first dataset and a second dataset from the plurality of datasets, wherein the identified first dataset and the identified second dataset each include at least one dataset entry having the at least one constraint term in one of multiple entry fields. In an operation 408, method 400 may include identifying the at least one dataset entry within the first dataset and the second dataset (i.e., a first entry and a second entry) having the at least one constraint term in one of multiple entry fields. In some implementations, operation 406 and operation 408 may be performed by a processor component the same as or similar to search component 204 (shown in FIG. 2 and described herein).
In an operation 410, method 400 may include causing a visual representation of at least the first entry and the second entry to be provided to the user. In some implementations, operation 410 may be performed by a processor component the same as or similar to display component 208 (shown in FIG. 2 and described herein).
The techniques described herein are implemented by one or more special-purpose computing devices. The special-purpose computing devices may be hard-wired to perform the techniques, or may include circuitry or digital electronic devices such as one or more application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) or field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) that are persistently programmed to perform the techniques, or may include one or more hardware processors programmed to perform the techniques pursuant to program instructions in firmware, memory, other storage, or a combination. Such special-purpose computing devices may also combine custom hard-wired logic, ASICs, or FPGAs with custom programming to accomplish the techniques. The special-purpose computing devices may be desktop computer systems, server computer systems, portable computer systems, handheld devices, networking devices or any other device or combination of devices that incorporate hard-wired and/or program logic to implement the techniques.
FIG. 5 depicts a block diagram of an example computer system 500 in which any of the embodiments described herein may be implemented. The computer system 500 includes a bus 502 or other communication mechanism for communicating information, one or more hardware processors 504 coupled with bus 502 for processing information. Hardware processor(s) 504 may be, for example, one or more general purpose microprocessors.
The computer system 500 also includes a main memory 506, such as a random access memory (RAM), cache and/or other dynamic storage devices, coupled to bus 502 for storing information and instructions to be executed by processor 504. Main memory 506 also may be used for storing temporary variables or other intermediate information during execution of instructions to be executed by processor 504. Such instructions, when stored in storage media accessible to processor 504, render computer system 500 into a special-purpose machine that is customized to perform the operations specified in the instructions.
The computer system 500 further includes a read only memory (ROM) 508 or other static storage device coupled to bus 502 for storing static information and instructions for processor 504. A storage device 510, such as a magnetic disk, optical disk, or USB thumb drive (Flash drive), etc., is provided and coupled to bus 502 for storing information and instructions.
The computer system 500 may be coupled via bus 502 to a display 512, such as a cathode ray tube (CRT) or LCD display (or touch screen), for displaying information to a computer user. An input device 514, including alphanumeric and other keys, is coupled to bus 502 for communicating information and command selections to processor 504. Another type of user input device is cursor control 516, such as a mouse, a trackball, or cursor direction keys for communicating direction information and command selections to processor 504 and for controlling cursor movement on display 512. This input device typically has two degrees of freedom in two axes, a first axis (e.g., x) and a second axis (e.g., y), that allows the device to specify positions in a plane. In some embodiments, the same direction information and command selections as cursor control may be implemented via receiving touches on a touch screen without a cursor.
The computing system 500 may include a user interface module to implement a GUI that may be stored in a mass storage device as executable software codes that are executed by the computing device(s). This and other modules may include, by way of example, components, such as software components, object-oriented software components, class components and task components, processes, functions, attributes, procedures, subroutines, segments of program code, drivers, firmware, microcode, circuitry, data, databases, data structures, tables, arrays, and variables.
The computer system 500 may implement the techniques described herein using customized hard-wired logic, one or more ASICs or FPGAs, firmware and/or program logic which in combination with the computer system causes or programs computer system 500 to be a special-purpose machine. According to one embodiment, the techniques herein are performed by computer system 500 in response to processor(s) 504 executing one or more sequences of one or more instructions contained in main memory 506. Such instructions may be read into main memory 506 from another storage medium, such as storage device 510. Execution of the sequences of instructions contained in main memory 506 causes processor(s) 504 to perform the process steps described herein. In alternative embodiments, hard-wired circuitry may be used in place of or in combination with software instructions.
The term “non-transitory media,” and similar terms, as used herein refers to any media that store data and/or instructions that cause a machine to operate in a specific fashion. Such non-transitory media may comprise non-volatile media and/or volatile media. Non-volatile media includes, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as storage device 510. Volatile media includes dynamic memory, such as main memory 506. Common forms of non-transitory media include, for example, a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, solid state drive, magnetic tape, or any other magnetic data storage medium, a CD-ROM, any other optical data storage medium, any physical medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM, and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, NVRAM, any other memory chip or cartridge, and networked versions of the same.
Non-transitory media is distinct from but may be used in conjunction with transmission media. Transmission media participates in transferring information between non-transitory media. For example, transmission media includes coaxial cables, copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise bus 502. Transmission media can also take the form of acoustic or light waves, such as those generated during radio-wave and infra-red data communications.
Various forms of media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to processor 504 for execution. For example, the instructions may initially be carried on a magnetic disk or solid state drive of a remote computer. The remote computer can load the instructions into its dynamic memory and send the instructions over a telephone line using a modem. A modem local to computer system 500 can receive the data on the telephone line and use an infra-red transmitter to convert the data to an infra-red signal. An infra-red detector can receive the data carried in the infra-red signal and appropriate circuitry can place the data on bus 502. Bus 502 carries the data to main memory 506, from which processor 504 retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by main memory 506 may retrieves and executes the instructions. The instructions received by main memory 506 may optionally be stored on storage device 510 either before or after execution by processor 504.
The computer system 500 also includes a communication interface 518 coupled to bus 502. Communication interface 518 provides a two-way data communication coupling to one or more network links that are connected to one or more local networks. For example, communication interface 518 may be an integrated services digital network (ISDN) card, cable modem, satellite modem, or a modem to provide a data communication connection to a corresponding type of telephone line. As another example, communication interface 518 may be a local area network (LAN) card to provide a data communication connection to a compatible LAN (or WAN component to communicated with a WAN). Wireless links may also be implemented. In any such implementation, communication interface 518 sends and receives electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams representing various types of information.
A network link typically provides data communication through one or more networks to other data devices. For example, a network link may provide a connection through local network to a host computer or to data equipment operated by an Internet Service Provider (ISP). The ISP in turn provides data communication services through the world wide packet data communication network now commonly referred to as the “Internet”. Local network and Internet both use electrical, electromagnetic or optical signals that carry digital data streams. The signals through the various networks and the signals on network link and through communication interface 518, which carry the digital data to and from computer system 500, are example forms of transmission media.
The computer system 500 can send messages and receive data, including program code, through the network(s), network link and communication interface 518. In the Internet example, a server might transmit a requested code for an application program through the Internet, the ISP, the local network and the communication interface 518.
Certain embodiments are described herein as including logic or a number of components, engines, or mechanisms. Engines may constitute either software engines (e.g., code embodied on a machine-readable medium) or hardware engines. A “hardware engine” is a tangible unit capable of performing certain operations and may be configured or arranged in a certain physical manner. In various example embodiments, one or more computer systems (e.g., a standalone computer system, a client computer system, or a server computer system) or one or more hardware engines of a computer system (e.g., a processor or a group of processors) may be configured by software (e.g., an application or application portion) as a hardware engine that operates to perform certain operations as described herein.
In some embodiments, a hardware engine may be implemented mechanically, electronically, or any suitable combination thereof. For example, a hardware engine may include dedicated circuitry or logic that is permanently configured to perform certain operations. For example, a hardware engine may be a special-purpose processor, such as a Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) or an Application Specific Integrated Circuit (ASIC). A hardware engine may also include programmable logic or circuitry that is temporarily configured by software to perform certain operations. For example, a hardware engine may include software executed by a general-purpose processor or other programmable processor. Once configured by such software, hardware engines become specific machines (or specific components of a machine) uniquely tailored to perform the configured functions and are no longer general-purpose processors. It will be appreciated that the decision to implement a hardware engine mechanically, in dedicated and permanently configured circuitry, or in temporarily configured circuitry (e.g., configured by software) may be driven by cost and time considerations.
Accordingly, the phrase “hardware engine” should be understood to encompass a tangible entity, be that an entity that is physically constructed, permanently configured (e.g., hardwired), or temporarily configured (e.g., programmed) to operate in a certain manner or to perform certain operations described herein. As used herein, “hardware-implemented engine” refers to a hardware engine. Considering embodiments in which hardware engines are temporarily configured (e.g., programmed), each of the hardware engines need not be configured or instantiated at any one instance in time. For example, where a hardware engine comprises a general-purpose processor configured by software to become a special-purpose processor, the general-purpose processor may be configured as respectively different special-purpose processors (e.g., comprising different hardware engines) at different times. Software accordingly configures a particular processor or processors, for example, to constitute a particular hardware engine at one instance of time and to constitute a different hardware engine at a different instance of time.
Hardware engines can provide information to, and receive information from, other hardware engines. Accordingly, the described hardware engines may be regarded as being communicatively coupled. Where multiple hardware engines exist contemporaneously, communications may be achieved through signal transmission (e.g., over appropriate circuits and buses) between or among two or more of the hardware engines. In embodiments in which multiple hardware engines are configured or instantiated at different times, communications between such hardware engines may be achieved, for example, through the storage and retrieval of information in memory structures to which the multiple hardware engines have access. For example, one hardware engine may perform an operation and store the output of that operation in a memory device to which it is communicatively coupled. A further hardware engine may then, at a later time, access the memory device to retrieve and process the stored output. Hardware engines may also initiate communications with input or output devices, and can operate on a resource (e.g., a collection of information).
The various operations of example methods described herein may be performed, at least partially, by one or more processors that are temporarily configured (e.g., by software) or permanently configured to perform the relevant operations. Whether temporarily or permanently configured, such processors may constitute processor-implemented engines that operate to perform one or more operations or functions described herein. As used herein, “processor-implemented engine” refers to a hardware engine implemented using one or more processors.
Similarly, the methods described herein may be at least partially processor-implemented, with a particular processor or processors being an example of hardware. For example, at least some of the operations of a method may be performed by one or more processors or processor-implemented engines. Moreover, the one or more processors may also operate to support performance of the relevant operations in a “cloud computing” environment or as a “software as a service” (SaaS). For example, at least some of the operations may be performed by a group of computers (as examples of machines including processors), with these operations being accessible via a network (e.g., the Internet) and via one or more appropriate interfaces (e.g., an Application Program Interface (API)).
The performance of certain of the operations may be distributed among the processors, not only residing within a single machine, but deployed across a number of machines. In some example embodiments, the processors or processor-implemented engines may be located in a single geographic location (e.g., within a home environment, an office environment, or a server farm). In other example embodiments, the processors or processor-implemented engines may be distributed across a number of geographic locations.
Although an overview of the subject matter has been described with reference to specific example embodiments, various modifications and changes may be made to these embodiments without departing from the broader scope of embodiments of the present disclosure. Such embodiments of the subject matter may be referred to herein, individually or collectively, by the term “invention” merely for convenience and without intending to voluntarily limit the scope of this application to any single disclosure or concept if more than one is, in fact, disclosed.
It will be appreciated that an “engine,” “system,” “data store,” and/or “database” may comprise software, hardware, firmware, and/or circuitry. In one example, one or more software programs comprising instructions capable of being executable by a processor may perform one or more of the functions of the engines, data stores, databases, or systems described herein. In another example, circuitry may perform the same or similar functions. Alternative embodiments may comprise more, less, or functionally equivalent engines, systems, data stores, or databases, and still be within the scope of present embodiments. For example, the functionality of the various systems, engines, data stores, and/or databases may be combined or divided differently.
“Open source” software is defined herein to be source code that allows distribution as source code as well as compiled form, with a well-publicized and indexed means of obtaining the source, optionally with a license that allows modifications and derived works.
The data stores described herein may be any suitable structure (e.g., an active database, a relational database, a self-referential database, a table, a matrix, an array, a flat file, a documented-oriented storage system, a non-relational No-SQL system, and the like), and may be cloud-based or otherwise.
As used herein, the term “or” may be construed in either an inclusive or exclusive sense. Moreover, plural instances may be provided for resources, operations, or structures described herein as a single instance. Additionally, boundaries between various resources, operations, engines, engines, and data stores are somewhat arbitrary, and particular operations are illustrated in a context of specific illustrative configurations. Other allocations of functionality are envisioned and may fall within a scope of various embodiments of the present disclosure. In general, structures and functionality presented as separate resources in the example configurations may be implemented as a combined structure or resource. Similarly, structures and functionality presented as a single resource may be implemented as separate resources. These and other variations, modifications, additions, and improvements fall within a scope of embodiments of the present disclosure as represented by the appended claims. The specification and drawings are, accordingly, to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
Although the invention has been described in detail for the purpose of illustration based on what is currently considered to be the most practical and preferred implementations, it is to be understood that such detail is solely for that purpose and that the invention is not limited to the disclosed implementations, but, on the contrary, is intended to cover modifications and equivalent arrangements that are within the spirit and scope of the appended claims. For example, it is to be understood that the present invention contemplates that, to the extent possible, one or more features of any embodiment can be combined with one or more features of any other embodiment.
cause the graphical user interface to present the at least one first dataset entry of the first dataset and the at least one second dataset entry of the second dataset in corresponding rows of the table based on the updated one or more column names.
cause a visual representation of the second plurality of dataset entries to be provided to the user as the at least one first dataset entry.
cause a second visual representation of at least the third dataset entry to be provided to the user.
compare the first entry field to the second entry field, wherein the visual representation of the at least one first dataset entry and the at least one second dataset entry is based on at least the comparison of the first entry field to the second entry field.
compare the first value to the second value, wherein the visual representation of the at least one first dataset entry and the at least one second dataset entry is based on at least the comparison of the first value to the second value.
update the visual representation of the at least one first dataset entry based on the third type of entry field of the third entry field.
7. The system of claim 1, wherein the first type of entry field and the second type of entry field comprise one of a first name, a last name, a user identification, contact information, location, and/or position.
responsive to a determination that the stored dataset is associated with the at least one constraint term and the second dataset, identify the at least one second dataset entry including the at least one constraint term from the stored dataset.
add the identified dataset to the plurality of datasets.
generate a new dataset comprising at least the first dataset entry including the at least one constraint term and the second dataset entry including the at least one constraint term, wherein the new dataset is stored in a repository for available for later retrieval.
causing the graphical user interface to present the at least one first dataset entry of the first dataset and the at least one second dataset entry of the second dataset in corresponding rows of the table based on the updated one or more column names.
causing, by the computer system, a visual representation of the second plurality of dataset entries to be provided to the user as the at least one first dataset entry.
causing, by the computer system, a second visual representation of at least the third dataset entry to be provided to the user.
comparing, by the computer system, the first entry field to the second entry field, wherein the visual representation of the at least one first dataset entry and the at least one second dataset entry is based on at least the comparison of the first entry field to the second entry field.
comparing, by the computer system, the first value to the second value, wherein the visual representation of the at least one first dataset entry and the at least one second dataset entry is based on at least the comparison of the first value to the second value.
updating, by the computer system, the visual representation of the at least one first dataset entry based on the third type of entry field of the third entry field.
17. The method of claim 11, wherein the first type of entry field and the second type of entry field comprise one of a first name, a last name, a user identification, contact information, location, and/or position.
responsive to a determination that the stored dataset is associated with the at least one constraint term and the second dataset, identifying, by the computer system, the at least one second dataset entry including the at least one constraint term from the stored dataset.
causing, by the computer system, the identified dataset to be added to the plurality of datasets.
generating, by the computer system, a new dataset comprising at least the first dataset entry including the at least one constraint term and the second dataset entry including the at least one constraint term, wherein the new dataset is stored in a repository for available for later retrieval.
"SAP BusinessObjects Explorer Online Help," Mar. 19, 2012, retrieved on Apr. 21, 2016 http://help.sap.com/businessobject/product_guides/boexir4/en/xi4_exp_user_en.pdf.
Appact, "Smart Thinking for Super Apps," <http://www.appacts.com> Printed Jul. 18, 2013 in 4 pages.
Cohn, et al., "Semi-supervised clustering with user feedback," Constrained Clustering: Advances in Algorithms, Theory, and Applications 4.1 (2003): 17-32.
Countly Mobile Analytics, <http://countly/> Printed Jul. 18, 2013 in 9 pages.
Gill et al., "Computerised Linking of Medical Records: Methodological Guidelines."
Gorr et al., "Crime Hot Spot Forecasting: Modeling and Comparative Evaluation", Grant 98-IJ-CX-K005, May 6, 2002, 37 pages.
Hansen et al., "Analyzing Social Media Networks with NodeXL: Insights from a Connected World", Chapter 4, pp. 53-67 and Chapter 10, pp. 143-164, published Sep. 2010.
Hua et al., "A Multi-attribute Data Structure with Parallel Bloom Filters for Network Services", HiPC 2006, LNCS 4297, pp. 277-288, 2006.
Janssen, Jan-Keno, "Wo bist'n du?-Googles Geodienst Latitude," Jan. 17, 2011, pp. 86-88, retrieved from the internet on Jul. 30, 2015 http://www.heise.de/artikel-archiv/ct/2011/03/086/@00250@/ct.11.03.086-088.pdf.
Janssen, Jan-Keno, "Wo bist'n du?—Googles Geodienst Latitude," Jan. 17, 2011, pp. 86-88, retrieved from the internet on Jul. 30, 2015 http://www.heise.de/artikel-archiv/ct/2011/03/086/@00250@/ct.11.03.086-088.pdf.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 14/319,161 dated May 4 2015.
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 14187996.5 dated Feb. 29, 2016.
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 15201924.6 dated Apr. 25, 2016.
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 16152984.7 dated Mar. 24, 2016.
Official Communication for European Patent Application No. 18166684.3 dated May 25, 2018.
Official Communication for Netherlands Patent Application No. 2012417 dated Sep. 18, 2015.
Official Communication for Netherlands Patent Application No. 2012421 dated Sep. 18, 2015.
Official Communication for Netherlands Patent Application No. 2012438 dated Sep. 21, 2015.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/141,252 dated Apr. 14, 2016.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/225,160 dated Jun. 16, 2016.
Official Communication for U.S. Appl. No. 14/929,584 dated May 25, 2016.
Psaltis, Andrew G., "Streaming Data-Designing the Real-Time Pipeline," Jan. 16, 2015, vol. MEAP V03, pp. 0-12.
Psaltis, Andrew G., "Streaming Data—Designing the Real-Time Pipeline," Jan. 16, 2015, vol. MEAP V03, pp. 0-12.
Steve Jones Ed-Association for Computing Machinery: "Graphical query specification and dynamic result previews for a digital library", UIST '98. 11th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology San. Francisco, CA Nov. 1-4, 1998, pp. 143-151.
Steve Jones Ed—Association for Computing Machinery: "Graphical query specification and dynamic result previews for a digital library", UIST '98. 11th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology San. Francisco, CA Nov. 1-4, 1998, pp. 143-151.
Valentini et al., "Ensembles of Learning Machines", M. Marinaro and R. Tagliaferri (Eds.): WIRN VIETRI 2002, LNCS 2486, pp. 3-20.
Vose et al., "Help File for ModelRisk Version 5," 2007, Vose Software, pp. 349-353. [Uploaded in 5 Parts].
Wikipedia, "Mobile Web," Jan. 23, 2015, retrieved from the internet on Mar. 15, 2016 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Mobile_Web&oldid=643800164.
Windley, Phillip J., "The Live Web: Building Event-Based Connections in the Cloud," Dec. 21, 2011, pp. 10, 216.

References: Application No. 14187996
 Application No. 15201924
 Application No. 16152984
 Application No. 18166684
 Application No. 2012417
 Application No. 2012421
 Application No. 2012438