Source: https://hurleyburish.com/wisconsin-supreme-court-decides-handgun-case/
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 02:21:37+00:00

Document:
Wisconsin Supreme Court Decides Handgun Case | Hurley Burish, S.C.
We previously wrote about a case in the Wisconsin Supreme Court dealing with the conflict of two statutes that address the carrying of a firearm in an automobile. [https://hurleyburish.com/wisconsin-supreme-court-to-address-two-statutes-that-regulate-how-handguns-may-be-transported/] One statute allows the transport of a loaded handgun in an automobile. The other makes it a crime to carry a concealed weapon in an automobile. As to the latter, if the loaded handgun is within the passenger compartment, and thus within the reach of the driver, the law has been broken (placing the loaded handgun in the glovebox or in the luggage compartment may not make a difference legally as Court have found both of these areas to be within the reach of the driver). A person is guilty of carrying a concealed weapon if he or she “goes armed with” a concealed and dangerous weapon. Wis. Stat. § 941.23(1)(ag). But the safe transport statute expressly permits transporting a loaded handgun in an automobile. Wis. Stat. § 167.31(2)(b)1.
In a 6-1 decision the Wisconsin Supreme Court held that carrying a handgun in a car, even if permitted by one statute, could still expose the driver of the car to a criminal charge for carrying a concealed weapon. In State of Wisconsin v. Grandberry, 2018 WI 29, the defendant was convicted of carrying a concealed weapon, a handgun that was located in the glove compartment of his automobile. He argued that transporting the loaded handgun was lawful under the safe transport statute and that it was unconstitutional to apply the concealed weapon law to the facts of the case. The Wisconsin Supreme Court disagreed and affirmed his conviction.
The primary takeaway from the Court’s decision is that if you are operating a motor vehicle, and you are either carrying a handgun or you’ve placed the handgun in your automobile (while driving to the shooting range, for example), you need a concealed carry permit. Lacking a concealed carry permit, the transport of a handgun in an automobile is unlawful. And while police (and in particular, the DNR) are instructed to permit the transport of a long-gun (rifles and shotguns) in an automobile, their transport in an automobile remains unlawful.
In a decision authored by Justice Gableman, the Court determined that, notwithstanding a statute that permits the transporation of a loaded handgun in an automobile (Wis. Stat. § 167.31), if the handgun is concealed and out of sight from outside of the automobile and within the reach of the automobile’s occupant(s), it’s a concealed weapon. Only if the automobile occupant has been issued a concealed carry permit (under Wis. Stat. § 175.60), is the presence of the loaded handgun in the automobile lawful.
A point emphasized by Justice Daniel Kelly in his concurrence (a worthwhile read—though concurring in the Court’s mandate, his writing is more akin to a dissent), is the Court’s use of what “within reach” means. This leads to the lawyer’s practical take-away.
This just means that the jury resolves as a factual matter the potentiality described by our Fourth Amendment jurisprudence. The Fourth Amendment defines the outer parameters of what could be lawfully within a defendant’s reach; the jury decides whether a specific defendant could actually reach that location under the circumstances of a specific case. If he could, then the weapon was ‘within reach’ within the meaning of the Concealed Carry Statute. However, if circumstances arise that make it impossible for a defendant to obtain a weapon from the area described by Belton and Gant, the jury may acquit.
Id., ¶50. As noted by the dissent, the decision may “necessitate a trial in every concealed carry “within reach” case, regardless of where the weapon is located in the car.” Id, ¶ 89 n.10.
The lone dissent, authored by Justice Rebecca Grassl Bradley noted a number of unresolved issues with the interplay between the statutes. Her dissent argues that “The interplay of these statutes does not provide clear notice or effective direction on how to comply with the law, and the lack of clarity allows for selective enforcement of Wis. Stat. § 941.23.” Justice Grassl Bradley notes that the decision “criminalizes hunters transporting long guns to hunting grounds, domestic violence victims transporting handguns to shooting ranges, and archers transporting crossbows to archeries.” In contrast to the majority decision, she seeks to “construe these statutes to enable citizens who lawfully own firearms, crossbows, and bows to safely transport their weapons without subjecting themselves to criminal liability.” As set forth in her dissent, Justice Grassl Bradley “would align Wisconsin law with the constitutions of both this state and the United States and apply the original meaning of ‘go armed with’ as defined in Heller.” Id.
So while Grandberry puts to rest legal arguments between two statutes that treat the transportation of handguns differently, the decision highlights unresolved issues with the statutes and suggests that lawyers focus on whether a jury could decide whether the handgun was, in fact, within the defendant’s reach.
I can’t thank you enough for the work done on my case during the past few months. To have the opportunity to wipe my record clean after making the mistake that I did is incredible and I can’t express my gratitude enough. You seemed like you genuinely cared about my legal status and future, and I trusted in you and your team the entire time. It was a pleasure getting to know you. Thank you again.
We appreciated very much your office keeping us informed through the different stages of this process.
Thanks to Amber and to Jonas for all your efforts on our son’s behalf.
I want to take this opportunity to thank you for all you have done for me for the last 5 years. I appreciate taking me in when I needed counsel. Not only do I want to show my thanks and appreciation on my behalf, but also on behalf of my son, whom I’ve been able to see grow up. He is my light and only reason to try and better myself.
You guys have helped me get motivation from a negative situation by continuing to be a fair person. I truly hope I get to see you again in a much different scenario.
Would we recommend him? Absolutely 100%.
Recently we found ourselves in shock when one of our kids got into legal trouble. We had no clue where to turn or what to do. During our research we came across Jonas’ webpage. To us it was important that we hire the best legal help we could. That we find someone who would fight to protect our kid as much as we would, someone who cared and would be honest with us, someone whose past clients said could be trusted. We sent an email to his office to see if our case was the type of case he handled and were amazed how quickly and perfectly things fell into place. Jonas called us personally – during the call he repeatedly said “It is serious but it’s going to be OK Mom.” He was right. It was serious, but it is going to be OK. Would we recommend him? Absolutely 100%. He didn’t pull any punches with us. He was honest and forthright. He helped us through a very trying time in our lives and we are grateful.
Talented, thorough, tough-minded and tenacious.
Mr. Bednarek is, without question, a talented, thorough, tough-minded and tenacious attorney. He is an advocate for no one but you. He knows how the law and the jurisprudence system can work together to his clients benefit and makes it happen. Highest recommendation!
A really honest lawyer…you won’t be disappointed.
Jonas goes above and beyond what you think he’s going to do for you and more, just talking to him makes you feel safe about your problems. And he does what he says he’s going to do for you and your situation. Just a really honest lawyer, makes you feel relaxed, and no worries. Just hire him, you won’t be disappointed.
Both Jonas and Amber were very knowledgeable and courteous. Both were very helpful during follow up even after my case was adjudicated. Would highly recommend.
A+ in all areas !
Jonas made my OWI process through the initial visit with him until the end very easy. I felt humiliation about the whole situation, but his whole team made me feel that we all make mistakes. And that the law is dual sided and with excellent representation in court that the whole legal process is actually not as awful as one would perceive. A+ in all areas!
Jonas was a wonderful attorney. I felt that he always had my best interest at heart and explained things well and in a timely manner. It is a stressful time when an attorney is needed, and his staff and him made it a lot less stressful.
David Saperstein is a very good lawyer. He understands the needs of a client and will not steer you wrong on your case. From the moment we started discussing my case David put me at ease that I hired the right law firm. With his knowledge and calm manner …I cannot’ say enough positive about him. You would be smart to retain his skill set.
David was very educated about the law. He was always on top of responding to any and all questions I had regarding my case. Along with providing me with the best representation I could have hoped for.
David filed a motion to suppress the traffic stop saying it was not a justified stop and the motion passed, so all charges were dropped. He is a great attorney and really did his homework to make this work.
Jonas went above and beyond for my son.
Jonas went above and beyond for my son. This included attending a meeting with the school my child attends. He was also available for follow-up questions regarding my child’s return to school. He was very knowledgeable of the law and how it applied to my child.
Jonas and his associates put me at ease.
Attorney Bednarek was terrific at handling my case. He and his associates put me at ease throughout the process and prepared me for eventualities that I hadn’t considered, saving me a fair amount of time and money. I’m very glad that I secured his services and would definitely recommend him to anybody in need of legal representation that is both skilled and affordable.
A steadfast proponent of my rights & innocence.
Attorney Bednarek was a steadfast proponent of my rights and innocence throughout the long tenuous fight with the state of Wisconsin. Without him and his team I would be writing project innocence instead of this review. For this I am forever in his debt. I would highly recommend him for an attorney and advocate.
Incredibly helpful in dropping my charges.
David was incredibly helpful in dropping my charges in an efficient and timely manner. Both David and Amber were very responsive whenever contacted and I felt all my questions were addressed. I certainly will be referring them to friends seeking counsel. Thanks again, Bednarek.
Could not have expected a better outcome.
I would like to thank you and the rest of the team for everything. I am completely satisfied with how Bednarek Law Office represented me. You thoroughly explained the details of the case. If I had questions you made the effort to get me answers. You charged a fair fee for your services, and I was very pleased with the outcome. I could not have expected a better outcome than what I got.
Thank you for handling my case. Having a representative with experience reduced my stress level. You were very knowledgeable and professional. I appreciate all of your hard work.
Jonas helped me reclaim my life.
I would highly recommend Mr. Bednarek for a variety of legal representation. I had a tricky federal traffic case that very few lawyers were skilled enough to complete effectively. Jonas did a great job and he made the process as seamless and painless as possible. He’s experienced, intelligent, honest and very easy to talk to. Nobody wants to run into legal problems, but who you choose to represent you is extremely important. Jonas was in my corner and he helped me reclaim my life.
I used Attorney Bednarek and was greatly pleased with the entire experience.
Hurley Burish, S.C. recognized as Tier One Law Firm in the 2017 U.S. News & World Report-Best Lawyers® Law Firm Rankings.
Dedicated to providing clients with the comprehensive, creative, and thorough work expected of large firms, HurleyBurish also maintains the personal working relationships and cost-effectiveness associated with smaller firms.

References: § 941
 § 167
 v. 
 § 167
 § 175
 § 941