Source: https://es.scribd.com/doc/315941199/Ward-v-Massachusetts-Health-209-F-3d-29-1st-Cir-2000
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 23:55:18+00:00

Document:
209 F.3d 29 (1st Cir.
and Hill & Barlow were on brief, for appellee.
on brief for Associated Industries of Massachusetts, amicus curiae.
remand for proceedings consistent with this opinion.
The following facts are summarized in the light most favorable to the appellant.
not notify MHRI of any disability at this time.
MHRI requires its employees to fill out daily time sheets under a "flex-time"
9:00 a.m. and leave for the day after they have worked seven and a half hours.
caused stiffness and pain in the mornings.
denied that he falsified the entry, he was suspended for three days without pay.
period of inactivity, and are especially prominent in the morning."
terminated because of his disability.
issue as to any material fact and that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
novo and assess the facts in a light most favorable to Ward. See Morris v.
Government Dev. Bank of Puerto Rico, 27 F.3d 746, 748 (1st Cir. 1994).
inferences," could resolve it in favor of the nonmoving party. Smith v. F.W.
F.3d 428, 435 (1st Cir. 1995).
disabled within the meaning of the Act; (2) he was a qualified individual, i.e.
of pain and stiffness he will face on a given morning is unpredictable.
WL 164004, *2-*4 (N.D. Ill.); Aquinas v. Federal Express Corp., 940 F. Supp.
F. Supp. 578, 581-82 (D. Colo. 1995); Hendry v. GTE North, Inc., 896 F. Supp.
816, 825-27 (N.D. Ind. 1995); Barfield v. Bell South Telecomms., Inc., 886 F.
County Comm'rs, 859 F. Supp. 498, 506-09 (D. Kan. 1994); Kennedy v.
(9th Cir. 1996); Guice-Mills v. Derwinski, 772 F. Supp. 188, 199 (S.D.N.Y.
allow Ward to perform the essential functions of his job.
attendance during prescribed work hours" is an essential function of Ward's job.
to any factor but presumably applies to and affects each of them.
(8th Cir. 1995); Monette v. EDS Corp., 90 F.3d 1173, 1182 n.8, 1184 (6th Cir.
Ward's need for constant supervision.
performed daily); Heise v. Genuine Parts Co., 900 F. Supp. 1137, 1152-53 (D.
position required four basic functions to be performed daily); Barfield, 886 F.
predictable. But see Kennedy, 1994 WL 740765 at *6 (citing Walders v.
Garrett, 765 F. Supp. 303, 314 (E.D. Va. 1991)).
requested accommodation would impose undue hardship. See 42 U.S.C.
flexible schedule would present "significant difficulty or expense," 29 C.F.R.
defeat almost any reasonable accommodation.
ensure that her deadlines were met); Carr, 23 F.3d at 529 (concluding that "
perform the essential functions of his job.
sleeping. App. at 104 (letter of Dr. Jeffrey R. Wohlgethan, May 13, 1998).
he estimates that he averages about two hours of sleep per night. See id. at 195.
early that he would have to go to bed at three in the afternoon." Id. at 159.
of attempted suicide, which does not flow directly from her depression. See id.
finding against him on this element was improper.
sufficient evidence that his condition "substantially limits" major life activities.
506, 513 n.7 (1st Cir. 1996) (citing 29 C.F.R. 1630.1, app. (1995)).
unreasonable); Hypes v. First Commerce Corp., 3 F. Supp. 2d 712, 719 (E.D.
and efficiency of others in his department.).
and the impact on the facility's ability to conduct business.
The Inadequacies of Health Care Policy for Disabled Persons in the U.S.
Journal Club on "Oral Health-Related Quality of Life of Patients With Oral Lichen Planus, Leukoplakia, or Squamous Cell Carcinoma"
SBI PO Recruitment Notification 2017 - Released!

References: v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.