Source: http://blog.wwpa.com/?tag=Fraud&page=6
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 05:31:16+00:00

Document:
Not one client from the traditional outsourcing countries will search for a broker or consultant abroad. The clients like to have a security and for this reason they will hire a outsourcing broker or consultant which is living near of them. For the case that something is running wrong with the project they are in this case immediately able to make a complain directly. The client would have not more security if he would hire a center directly instead a broker or consultant from abroad. The client would even save the salary for the broker. Why in this case should he hire a broker or consultant from abroad? Based on this rule are 99.99% of all the outsourcing campaign offers with source in the low wage countries are nothing else than SCAM!!!
Hello friends! I am going to introduce an organization WHITEWAVE OUTSOURCING as a fraud organization. It will take money from clients and then not provide the services in a proper manner. At the same time it will not provide salary to employees.
Branch- M.I.Road Branch JAIPUR- 302001.
Organization Name- Amigos Outsourcing Pvt. Ltd.
I submit the cheque on 4th Nov but when the cheque goes into process stage they canceled the cheque.
Contact Numbers of Amigos Outsourcing Pvt. Ltd are not working.
I left the organization last month. Please do not sign any agreement with them. If you want to do FIR or want to take any legal action you can go through for that.
A short Google search found the website whitewaveoutsourcing.com (2016-02-25: Link removed website already not reachable) and at the website there are three non-voice campaign offers. One is an insurance form filling project and the second one is Data Mangement Form Filling. Both are Word or PDF copy and paste work. From the nature of the data protection law in the traditional outsourcing countries are both projects nothing else than a scam offer. The third project should be an E-Book Publishing project where each seat has a work load of 500 books, which need to get converted from "Word to URL". As the nature of e-books is that they are already digital and not in Word available is even this project nothing else a scam.
As all the three projects are only scams are even no clients for the offered projects available. The company Whitewave Outsourcing likes only to scam the centers. For scamming clients are they too stupid to get clients.
Link from the Facebook profile Harsha Urs (https://www.facebook.com/harsha.urs.7) removed as it returns error 404 - not found.
The "Scammer: Vikram Pratap Singh - SCISOLUTIONS.US, ALDIABLOS.US, ALDIABLOS.COM and SHRSOLUTION.ORG" is still active and tries to sell dreams to call centers. For offering these dreams he likes to get a dream charge, sorry he calls it consultancy charges, of INR 300,000 (~US$ 4,488.80). It looks like the scammer needs urgent a lot of money!
Until now Vikram Pratap Singh did not get it that the personal computer is nearly 40 years old and that in the civilized countries are for this reason no form filling projects available. All forms are getting generated from computers and there are no forms which need to get manually filled. Additional are consumer data protected by the law in the traditional outsourcing countries and the fines for breaking this law are very high so that not one company will take the risk and would outsource (not onshore and not offshore) their data processing. Health and bank data are very sensible data and have additional a special protection from the law in the traditional outsourcing countries.
Typical for each scammer is that he cannot show his face in his LinkedIn profile. The reason for this is very simple - the scammer does not like to provide a manhunt picture by himself.
We are outsourcing company located in Ahmedabad . We also have existence in country such as USA, UK, Singapore and cities in India.
We have a tie up with client in US, UK, Canada, Australia and we can outsource their process to you.
In some of these processes we are the direct client located in India and take sole responsibility for your payment.
We charge you a consultancy fee for the processes that are given. All processes are genuine and free of risk.
Please see details of the project.
The forms need to be filled in to the software that will be provided.
The type of data needed to fill would be from an image or a PDF file.
Training will be provided online/onsite (Onsite training travel and other charges to be borne by the centre).
1 Slot = 10 seats.
Feel free contact me for any queries.
Update Jan. 18, 2017: Links for the domain shrsolution.org and to the host.aldiablos.com removed as they don't exists anymore.
You have requested an informal staff opinion as to the applicability to 2008 amendments to the Telemarketing Sales Rule (“TSR”) to a particular technology used by CallAssistant, L.C.(“CallAssistant”). The amendments at issue impose new restrictions on the use of prerecorded messages in telemarketing. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(v); 73 Fed. Reg. 15204 (Aug. 29, 2008).
Specifically, these amendments require, as of December 1, 2008, that any outbound telemarketing call that delivers a prerecorded message include: (1) if the call could be answered in person by a consumer, an automated interactive voice and/or keypress-activated opt-out mechanism that the call recipient can use at any time during the message to assert a Do Not Call request pursuant to § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(A); and (2) if the call could be answered by an answering machine or voicemail service, a toll-free telephone number that the call recipient can use to assert a Do Not Call request pursuant to § 310.4(b)(1)(iii)(A). Additionally, as of September 1, 2009, the amendments prohibit any outbound telemarketing call that delivers a prerecorded message unless the seller has obtained from the recipient of the call an express agreement, in writing, that evidences the willingness of the recipient of the call to receive calls that deliver prerecorded messages by or on behalf of that seller and includes such person’s telephone number and signature.
A live agent using the System places a call to a consumer and hears the consumer greeting. In response to the greeting, the agent may elect to speak to the call recipient using his or her voice, or may press a button to play an appropriate recorded script segment. After the agent’s response, the agent listens to the consumer customer’s reply. After listening to the consumer’s reply, the live agent again chooses whether to speak to the call recipient in his or her own voice, or another recording. At all times, even during the playing of any recorded segment, the agent retains the power to interrupt any recorded message to listen to the consumer and respond appropriately.
[T]he Commission notes that it is aware that the technology used in making prerecorded messages interactive is rapidly evolving, and that affordable technological advances may eventually permit the widespread use of interactive messages that are essentially indistinguishable from conversing with a human being. Accordingly, nothing in this notice should be interpreted to foreclose the possibility of petitions seeking further amendment of the TSR or exemption from the provisions adopted here.
73 Fed. Reg. 51180 (Aug. 29, 2008).
Furthermore, according to your description, “live agents hear every word spoken by the call recipient, and determine what is said” in response. A single agent always stays with a call from beginning to end.
You seek an opinion as to whether the amended TSR provisions on the use of prerecorded messages in telemarketing apply to CallAssistant’s calls that employ the technology summarized above. Based on the description of the technology included in your letter, the staff of the Federal Trade Commission has concluded that the 2008 TSR amendments cited above do not prohibit telemarketing calls using this technology if the calls that otherwise comply with the TSR and other applicable law. The 2008 amendments at 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(v) prohibit calls that deliver a prerecorded message and do not allow interaction with call recipients in a manner virtually indistinguishable from calls conducted by live operators. Unlike the technology that you describe, the delivery of prerecorded messages in such calls does not involve a live agent who controls the content and continuity of what is said to respond to concerns, questions, comments – or demands – of the call recipient.
In adopting the 2008 TSR amendments, the Commission noted that the intrusion of a telemarketing call on a consumer’s right to privacy “may be exacerbated immeasurably when there is no human being on the other end of the line.” 73 Fed. Reg. at 51180. The Commission observed that special restrictions on prerecorded telemarketing messages were warranted because they “convert the telephone from an instrument for two-way conversations into a oneway device for transmitting advertisements.” Id.1 Consequently, in Staff’s view, the concerns about prerecorded messages addressed in the 2008 TSR amendments do not apply to the calls described above, in which a live human being continuously interacts with the recipient of a call in a two-way conversation, but is permitted to respond by selecting recorded statements.
Nevertheless, the use of such technology in a campaign to induce the sales of goods or services, or charitable donations is “telemarketing” under the Telemarketing and Consumer Fraud and Abuse Prevention Act, 15 U.S.C. § 6106(4), and therefore must comply with the Rule’s other requirements and prohibitions. In particular, the technology must connect an outbound telephone call to a live agent within two seconds of the call recipient’s completed greeting. 16 C.F.R. § 310.4(b)(1)(iv). The agents making calls using this technology must disclose the purpose of the call, the identity of the seller, make other required disclosures, and comply with other TSR provisions preventing deceptive and abusive conduct. Id. §§ 310.3 and 310.4.
Please be advised that this opinion is based exclusively on all the information furnished in your request. This opinion applies only to the extent that actual company practices conform to the material submitted for review. Please be advised further that the views expressed in this letter are those of the FTC staff. They have not been reviewed, approved, or adopted by the Commission, and they are not binding upon the Commission. However, they do reflect the opinions of the staff members charged with enforcement of the TSR.
a live agent hears the called party from the greeting until the hang-up or transfer.
an agent is active in the line within 2 seconds the called party has finished his greeting.
the live agent is free in his choice to speak with the called party or playing prerecorded messages.
if the live agent is playing prerecorded messages he needs to have a possibility to stop the playback.
the Telemarketing Sales Rules (TSR) does not get changed.
Wesley Jon Pollard seems to be a scammer, but everybody, who’s got scammed from him, is guilty by himself. Wesley Jon Pollard could not show his face in the social networks and he did not have an own domain. He used the free hosting service from weebly for offering his scam campaigns. These people who have got scammed did not make their homework and there has even been nothing for making a background check. Their own greediness by hunting for a campaign has been the reason for their problems now.
At his LinkedIn account from Wesley Jon Pollard we’ll find a recommendation from a LinkedIn member Barry Bermudez. As Barry Bermudez has given him a recommendation is now the question open if Barry Bermudez is a partner in crime or not?
Updated August 28, 2015 (For this part are updates available take a look at the updates at the end of this article): Another partner in crime can be Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano (no public profile - see the pdf at the end of this report). Wesley Jon Pollard has given her a recommendation beginning with the words “Maria was recently appointed Director with us due to certain qualities she can bring on board that benefit our clients from all around the world ….”. This shows that she has been a director and a decision maker in the organization of Wesley Jon Pollard.
We cannot be sure that Wesley Jon Pollard is active at the site registered in Pakistan, but on the site we find the names Kristy Beede, Wesley Pollard and Scott Bigelow (the name of a wrestler died January 19, 2007). You can observe that not one of these profiles has a picture. Scammers don't like to provide a manhunt picture by themselves.
The UK address does not have any house and phone number. This address is incomplete and seems to got invented.
The US address is incomplete too. If you are using Google maps and take a look at the satellite pictures than you see that this is a forest area where you don't find any named houses.
Wesley Jon Pollard is active with his U.S. phone number on Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/jon.pollard.980), LinkedIn (https://www.linkedin.com/pub/dex-terity/100/53a/179) and Twitter (https://twitter.com/DexterityLeads). He is offering his scams via https://dexterityleads.wordpress.com/.
For the case someone has more information or better information about this case please feel free to contact me and I'll include your proves into the posting.
Maria was scammed too Rudolf, she was made and led to believe by Wes too, victims as well. For Barry, Wes, was with his legit company.
Its just that this Maria is clean, she was a victim as well.
I can vouch for you she is clean, she is a victim as well. She is pursuing Wes as well.
Maria was able to removed Wesley's recommendation . Please Sir, she is absolutely a victim here of Wesley as well.
Hi ref the post some information for you.
Ref Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano I have been assisting in the hunt for Wesley for a long time but ref Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano she has never been nor is a director for any of his companies, I do know that Wesley put all these recommendations on without her knowledge, and she has been trying to get hold of Wesley ever since to have it removed. She does not have a contract with Wesley and she is a freelancer and is NOT employed by the company as a director. Wesley used her to send out all his documents, contracts etc to centres. So i hope you can correct the post made about her as its not true.
I would say that your criticism of centre owners are unjust in this case, as they did due diligence and everyone they spoke to seemed to point to Wesley's out of the box company as being ok.
As a former friend of Wesley (I am no more since this) I can say that as an ex police officer in the uk, that he has committed fraud and theft against centres. Currently the police are fully aware and are acting to make an arrest soon.
So you know how this started I paste below a copy of the email I sent to the Philippine police regarding Wesley, which has finally led to where we are today after a long and exhaustive investigation by me, obtaining contacts he knows, obtaining all phone numbers of him, and his home address.
I think you are doing a fantastic job keep up the good work, I will give you updates as and when i hear from the police via Maria who has been helping me track Wesley as she is as shocked as everyone is more so.
Attached photo of Wesley Jon Pollard with his wife and son.
I wish to report Wesley Jon Pollard owner of Out of the Box solutions, as missing presumed kidnaped, since 7th July 2015.
The circumstances around his disappearance are as follows.
I have known Wesley Jon Pollard for many years. He lives in the Philippines and owns the company mentioned, which has a large number of important clients on his books. He arranges call centres for his clients, and makes a point of visiting each one to vet the company and ensure their procedures match their application. His mother is Jacqui Pereira, his sister is Corinna Pollard and he has a daughter Mercedes Pollard.
Call made by centre owner Naveen Kumar to Wesley on +639156110390 who answered, Mr Naveen Kumar asked if they should meet, Wesley said no he was tired and he was going to sleep, claiming he was in the Oberi hotel.
Delhi left on 10th July at 11:10 to Dehradul arriving 12 noon.
14th July staying in same hotel JW Marriot.
Was supposed to meet Naveen Kumar as he was to meet at the centre at 9am, Mr Naveen called him and asked shall he pick him up, to which Wesley said no I have my own arrangement.
Wesley was supposed to be in Mumbai until 27th.
I have checked with all hotels and he neither stayed at the hotels nor made any reservations. His laptop is on and he is showing as away on skype, this is unusual when he goes away he always shows offline. Also he is not answering his mobile, which is again unusual, as he is always contactable. He has not been on his Facebook page since 7th July and we cannot make any contact with him whatsoever.
It is my opinion having served for 10 years with the British Police (now retired) that Wesley Jon Pollard was not in India and never arrived there, I do not believe he was in Malaysia either, and that he is somewhere in the Philippines possibly kidnapped.
He did on a call when drunk one day say to his representative, that he had a million in the bank, this could easily have been overheard, but this is conjecture.
As he still is missing and his clients and centres are very worried about their contracts, I have taken over to try to help Maria Reburiano save his business from problems and I am talking with clients and centres to assure them that Wesley will contact them soon.
I therefore formally request that this case is looked into as a missing person possibly kidnapped, and that appropriate resources are engaged to find Wesley and ensure his safety and safe return.
From a legal standpoint as it can still be clearly read it would come under slander and libel, as it was not true, the hosting company would also be liable as well. I'm only just saying as I was in the police for 10 years so I know. I would not want to see maria take it down a legal route, which might happen anyway if she ended up harming herself because of all this. Do let me know what you think Rudolf.
That is exactly what everbody likes to read if he is opening Skype. The problem is only that Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano did not only accept the recommendation, where she got called to be a director from Wesley John Pollard, she called herself in her LinkedIn profile "Ma Eliza Reyes Reburiano. Title: Director for Sales / BPO (Philippines) at Out of the Box Solutions". As much as I like to help her for the reason that she has tried to help the scammed ones to find Wesley John Pollard, but she has chosen exactly the wrong way for getting help.
Interesting is in any case that we not only find at Eynsham online an entry where he describes himself as “I served the village as a Section Officer (Sgt) for Thames Valley Police Special Constabulary for 10 years, and started the first Eynsham foot patrols.”, we find an entry at Campaignprovider.com a page with the title “lord chris caudle's Page” (.pdf (197.20 kb)). The page has the first entry from February 2, 2012 (.pdf (180.64 kb)) and the last entry from September 10, 2014. At Christopher Caudle's LinkedIn profile (.pdf (459.36 kb)) does not get anything found about his work as Section Officer. At his LinkedIn profile are only jobs as CEO and chairman listed. It seems that Christopher Caudle is really a multi talent.
Christopher Caudle seems to have a problem with his elf-esteem and likes to title himself to be a Lord. The definition of the British title Lord can get found in the Encyclopaedia Britannica. However the name of Christopher Caudle does not get found in the Members of the UK House of Lords directory.
I don’t know the real background why Christopher Caudle stands up in this way for Maria. Anyone can make his thoughts by himself about the reasons. My opinion is that he thinks to know everything and does not accept any technical arguments from others. He knows the meaning of "it seems to be" otherwise he would not call in his Facebook postings for self-justice, he would use the official and legal way to file his complaints.
I’m sorry for Maria’s publicity in this case and everybody shall accept that she tries to help in the case against Wesley John Pollard. Please don't judge her for her past in this case. Maybe she got cheated too. Everybody is presumed innocent unless and until proven guilty and even in the case she get's found guilty for something in this case, is active repentance an extenuation.

References: § 310
 § 310
 § 310
 § 310
 § 6106
 § 310