Source: https://vi.scribd.com/document/396819018/Meltdown-and-Spectre-Class-Action-Tossed
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 19:49:12+00:00

Document:
21 Class Action Fairness Act. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d).
23 Consolidated Amended Complaint (“CAC”) for lack of standing and failure to state a claim. Dkt.
iDevices such as the iPad Pro, iPhone SE, iPhone 6s Plus, iPhone 7, and iPhone 8 in recent years.
Holdings in turn notified its licensees, including Defendant, of the Defects. Id.
did not mention, however, that the purpose of the iOS 11.2 release was to address the Defects. Id.
the Defects can only be fixed by replacing the hardware of each iDevice. Id. ¶¶ 3, 38, 44, 52.
Processor performance by as much as 50%, rendering affected iDevices substantially slower.” Id.
1 exceptional security. Id. ¶¶ 54-80.
7 Subclass, (2) a New Hampshire Subclass, and (3) a New York Subclass. Id. ¶ 83.
18 without impairing performance of the iDevices. Id.
4 above. Id. ¶¶ 201-206.
8 understanding of a case or controversy.” Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1547 (2016).
11 redressed by a favorable judicial decision.” Id. (citing Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S.
13 pleading stage, the plaintiff must clearly allege facts demonstrating each element. Id. at 1547.
23 purport to represent.” Lierboe v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 350 F.3d 1018, 1022 (9th Cir.
24 2003) (quoting Pence v. Andrus, 586 F.2d 733, 736-37 (9th Cir. 1978)); see also Spokeo, 136 S.
26 plaintiffs belong is not enough to meet Article III standing).
accessed by Spectre or Meltdown. Dkt. No. 49 at 17. See Cahen v. Toyota Motor Corp., 717 F.
were vulnerable to risk of hacking were speculative and not an injury-in-fact), aff’g 147 F. Supp.
their phones.” Dkt. No. 56 at 13. Accordingly, Defendant’s first argument is not persuasive.
Hr’g Tr. at ¶¶ 13-15.
Dkt. No. 49 at 17.
4 that their iDevices suffered degraded performance.
9 contending that plaintiffs failed to allege that the particular lattes they purchased were underfilled.
12 lattes were underfilled, even without plaintiffs measuring their own particular lattes. Id. at 1030.
19 leave at least 1/4 inch of space below the rim of the serving cup. Id. at 1030.
5 packages of cheese and cupcakes were systematically and routinely mislabeled and overpriced.
7 required to plead injury-in-fact. Id. at 738.
9 Defendant’s own testing indicated that the updates caused a slowdown affecting all iDevices.
18 that all iDevices suffered from degraded performance as a result of Defendant’s updates.
23 Meltdown “will have a negative effect on system performance.” CAC ¶ 43.
Exhibit C. Under the incorporation by reference doctrine, Exhibit C may be judicially noticed.
website rather than just plaintiff’s proffered portions).
5 establish Article III standing.
10 846-47 (N.D. Cal. 2012).
13 failed to disclose that their vehicles were susceptible to hacking. 717 Fed. App’x 720 (9th Cir.
24 sufficient facts to establish Article III standing. Id. at 724.
5 diminution in value argument.
6 In sum, Plaintiffs have failed to allege sufficient facts to establish Article III standing.
10 AMEND. Plaintiffs may file and serve an amended complaint no later than January 24, 2019.
13 than April 22, 2019.
14 IT IS SO ORDERED.
Defendant requests judicial notice and incorporation by reference of Exhibits A through H. Dkt.
C. For reasons previously discussed, the court takes judicial notice of Exhibit C. See n. 1.
A Japanese translation of the Constitution of Japan oath.

References: § 1332
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.