Source: http://journal.asu.ru/urisl/article/view/4040
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 00:23:06+00:00

Document:
Keywords: legal technique, presumption, fiction, efficiency of law-making, linguistic economy.
The article deals with the presumptions and fictions in relation to their technical and legal significance and the peculiarities of their capturing in the text of a statutory act. The case studies discussed in the article show that they can be captured both directly and indirectly in which case they can be identified only by interpreting text. At the same time it is noted that indirect presumptions must be transformed into direct ones for their better enforcement, and indirect fictions do not need this since no difficulties in their identification arise and this way of capturing is expedient for them. Fictions must necessarily be separated from negative fictitious phenomena since they as well as presumptions participate in the development of legal terms and due to their unique nature optimize not only legal regulation but also law-making work of a legislator thus contributing to linguistic economy, making the text of the statutory act concise, laconic and unambiguous all of which contributes to the compliance with the rules of legal technique imposed on it. Presumption in the meaning of an assumption with high degree of logical and historical probability is used not only in law but also in other sciences and everyday life where it functions as fiction by means of which the knowingly false is recognized as true in order to overcome the situation uncertainty and in order to propote normal development of social relations. Thus, presumptions and fictions are necessary elements of the text of a statutory act allowing to inform its sense to the addressees.
Бабаев В. К. Презумпции в советском праве. Горький, 1974.
Бабаев В. К. Теория государства и права. М., 2013.
Бабаев В. К. Теория современного советского права: фрагменты лекций и схемы. Н. Новгород, 1991.
Бронникова М. Н. Гражданско-правовая презумпция по российскому законодательству: содержание, правовые формы и применение: автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук. Казань, 2006.
Веденеев Е. Ю. Роль презумпций в гражданском праве, арбитражном и гражданском судопроизводстве. Государство и право. 1998. № 2. С. 43–49.
Воложанин В. П. Юридические предположения в советском гражданском праве и процессе: автореф. дис. ... канд. юрид. наук. Свердловск, 1953.
Грось Л. А. Влияние норм материального права на гражданское процессуальное право (научно-практические проблемы): автореф. дис. … д-ра юрид. наук. М., 1999.
Давыдова М. Л. Юридическая техника: проблемы теории и методологии: монография. Волгоград, 2009.
Джазоян Е. А. Категория фикции в гражданском праве: автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук. М., 2006.
Каминская В. И. Учение о правовых презумпциях в уголовном процессе. М., 1948.
Ковтун Н. Н. Презумпции и фикции уголовно-процессуального права России: технология осознанной лжи. Юридическая техника. 2010. № 4. С. 231–235.
Павлинов И. Я. О значении презумпций в филогенетике (по поводу статьи Ю.А. Песенко «Филогенетические презумпции...»). Журнал общей биологии. 2005. № 5. Т. 66. С. 436–441.
Панько К. К. Фикции в уголовном праве (в сфере законотворчества и правоприменении): автореф. дис. … канд. юрид. наук. Ярославль, 1998.
Первомайский В. Б. Презумпции в психиатрии. Киев, 2001.
Сериков Ю. А. Презумпции в гражданском судопроизводстве. М., 2008.
Синченко Г. Ч. Язык права. Часть II. Терминологический ажиотаж. Научный вестник Омской академии МВД России. 2017. № 1 (64). С. 57–64.
Ситникова А. И. Фикции в уголовном праве. Ленинградский юридический журнал. 2008. № 1. С. 60–67.
Федотов А. В. Понятие и классификация доказательственных презумпций. Журнал российского права. 2001. № 4. С. 45–55.
Филимонова И. В. Место юридической фикции в системе средств юридической техники. Алтайский юридический вестник. 2013. № 4 (4). С. 47–53.
Цуканов Н. Н. О критериях правовой презумпции. Законотворческая техника современной России: состояние, проблемы, совершенствование: В 2-х тт. Н. Новгород, 2001. Т. 1.
Babaev V. K. Presumptions in Soviet Law [Prezumptsii v sovetskom prave]. Gorky, 1974.
Babaev V. K. Theory of State and Law [Teoriya gosudarstva i prava]. Moscow, 2013.
Babaev V. K. The Theory of Modern Soviet Law: Passages from Lectures and Schemes [Teoriya sovremennogo sovetskogo prava: fragmenty lektsiy i skhemy]. N. Novgorod, 1991.
Bronnikova M. N. Civil-law Presumption under the Russian Legislation: Content, Legal Forms and Application [Grazhdansko-pravovaya prezumptsiya po rossiyskomu zakonodatel'stvu: soderzhaniye, pravovyye formy i primeneniye: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk], Kazan, 2006.
Vedeneev E. Yu. The Role of Presumptions in Civil Law, Arbitration and Civil Proceedings [Rol’ prezumptsiy v grazhdanskom prave, arbitrazhnom i grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve]. State and Law. 1998. № 2. P. 43–49.
Volozhanin V. P. Legal Assumptions in Soviet Civil Law and Litigation [Yuridicheskiye predpolozheniya v sovetskom grazhdanskom prave i protsesse: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk]. Sverdlovsk, 1953.
Gros L. A. Influence of Norms of Substantive Law on Civil Procedural Law (Scientific and Practical problems) [Vliyaniye norm material'nogo prava na grazhdanskoye protsessual'noye pravo (nauchno-prakticheskiye problemy): avtoref. dis. … d-ra yurid. nauk.]. Moscow, 1999.
Davydova M. L. Legal Technique: Problems of Theory and Methodology [Yuridicheskaya tekhnika: problemy teorii i metodologii: monografiya]. Volgograd, 2009.
Jazoyan E. A. Category of Fiction in Civil Law [Kategoriya fiktsii v grazhdanskom prave: avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk]. Moscow, 2006.
Kaminskaya V. I. The Studies of Legal Presumptions in the Criminal Process [Ucheniye o pravovykh prezumptsiyakh v ugolovnom protsesse]. Moscow, 1948.
Kovtun N. N. Presumptions and Fictions of the Criminal Procedural Law of Russia: the Technology of the Conscious Lie [Prezumptsii i fiktsii ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava Rossii: tekhnologiya osoznannoy lzhi]. Law technique. 2010. № 4. P. 231–235.
Pavlinov I. Ya. The Significance of Presumptions in Phylogenetics (in regard to the article by Pesenko Yu. A. «Phylogenetic presumptions ...») [O znachenii prezumptsiy v filogenetike (po povodu stat’i Yu. A. Pesenko «Filogeneticheskiye prezumptsii...»). Journal of General Biology. 2005. № 5. T. 66. P. 436–441.
Panko K. K. Fictions in Criminal Law (in the Field of Law-making and Law enforcement) [Fiktsii v ugolovnom prave (v sfere zakonotvorchestva i pravoprimenenii): avtoref. dis. … kand. yurid. nauk]. Yaroslavl, 1998.
Pervomaysky V. B. Presumptions in Psychiatry [Prezumptsii v psikhiatrii]. Kyiv, 2001.
Serikov Yu. A. Presumptions in Civil Legal Proceedings [Prezumptsii v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve]. Moscow, 2008.
Sinchenko G. Ch. Language of Law. Part II. Terminological excitement [Yazyk prava. Chast’ II. Terminologicheskiy azhiotazh]. The scientific vestnik of Omsk academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. 2017. № 1 (64). P. 57–64.
Sitnikova A. I. Fictions in the Criminal Law [Fiktsii v ugolovnom prave] Leningradskiy yuridicheskiy zhurnal. – Leningrad legal journal. 2008. № 1. P. 60–67.
Fedotov A. V. The Notion and Classification of Evidentiary Presumptions [Ponyatiye i klassifikatsiya dokazatel'stvennykh prezumptsiy]. Journal of Russian Law. 2001. № 4. P. 45–55.
Filimonova I. V. The Place of Legal Fiction in the System of Means of Legal Technique [Mesto yuridicheskoy fiktsii v sisteme sredstv yuridicheskoy tekhniki]. Altai legal vestnik. 2013. № 4 (4). P. 47–53.
Tsukanov N. N. On the Criteria of Legal Presumption [O kriteriyakh pravovoy prezumptsii]. Lawmaking technique of modern Russia: state, problems, improvement: a collection of articles: In 2 tomes. N. Novgorod, 2001. T. 1.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.