Source: http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013_11_03_archive.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 14:33:25+00:00

Document:
I feel like we know each other, I have written to you so often, although admittedly, you have never taken the time to write back. I am here to ask, "Are you a sophisticated "Uncle Tom" or a venerable leader of "We the People?" I recently asserted something similar to your Attorney General.
As I am sure you are aware the Black Robed Royalist Article III Judiciary UNCONSTITUTIONALLY and sophisticatedly has, in the very WORST sense, self-servingly, self-constructed "absolute power"  from their sophistry of "absolute immunity" to render "absolute corruption" of We the People's unalienable rights. "As long as rulers are above the law, citizens have the same type of freedom that slaves had on days when their masters chose not to beat them." We the People are slaves to the Black Robed Royalist Article III judiciary's UNCONSTITUTIONAL "absolute power"  as rendered from their sophistry of "absolute immunity."
In 2009-2010, I did 411 days in Federal Custody before they chose to NOTICED that I had a right to a speedy trial!!!!! We live in a Lawless Society via Eastern District Court of Missouri Case #4:09-cr-00659-CDP Document #78, Attachments #(1) Exhibit, time stamped 3/25/2010, 5:30 PM CDT.
I would hope, as an educated African American Constitutional Expert (J.D.) you know "absolute power's," most noteworthy "absolute corruption." It was with the efforts of "We the People" post-Civil War, as MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissenting in the Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 26 (1883) eloquently put it, "Constitutional provisions, adopted in the interest of liberty and for the purpose of securing, through national legislation, if need be, rights inhering in a state of freedom and belonging to American citizenship have been so construed as to defeat the ends the people desired to accomplish, which they attempted to accomplish, and which they supposed they had accomplished by changes in their fundamental law."
Just imagine where "We the People" would be today if the Black Robed Royalist Article III UNCONSTITUTIONAL independence of the judges via "absolute power"  had been brought to heel by "We the People's" fit "sense and reason of the law?" "We the People" would have, always, had the "property in rights" so many of us fought and died for with the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution for the United states of America, the civil War Amendments (13th, 14th and 15th), the Civil Rights Acts of 1866 (Formally titled "An Act to protect all Persons in the United States in their Civil Rights, and furnish the Means of their vindication") and The Enforcement Act of 1871 (17 Stat. 13) to secure the "property"  in our "rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws" as was the intent of the We the People, the Founders and post-Civil War Citizens.
Are you a sophisticated "Uncle Tom" that refuses to see the Black Robed Royalist, Article III, and unconstitutional Judiciary's "absolute corruption?"
Or are you a venerable leader of "We the People" that can see the necessity for Justice in the face of the Black Robed Royalist, Article III and unconstitutional Judiciary's malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid assertion of "absolute immunity?"
The source of the Black Robed Royalist Article III Judiciary's Supreme Court precedent reaches back 406 years to a dissolved, discredited corrupt, for CAUSE, court for a thus corrupted ruling i.e., Floyd & Barker (Star Chamber 1607), to evade their legal, designated under law, responsibility for We the People's inalienable justifiable "property in rights." The Star Chamber had its authority "repealed and absolutely revoked and made void" in 1641 with the Act of Parliament "Abolition of the Star Chamber" July 5, 1641. Now just because the Black Robed Royalist, Article III and unconstitutional Judiciary apparently, to this day, has NEVER GOTTEN the memo, that does not change the FACTS. Floyd & Barker a ruling from the Star Chamber 1607 was "repealed and absolutely revoked and made void," for SPECIFIC cause - abusing said "absolutely immune" power, by the Act of Parliament "Abolition of the Star Chamber" July 5, 1641. Thus Floyd & Barker is void, and it use amounts to fraud, fraus omnia corrumpit. Floyd & Barker's thus fraudulent progeny are made VOID AS WELL!!!!!
We the People in essence, if you can believe the Black Robed Royalist, Article III and unconstitutional Judiciary, "intended sub silentio to" trade the "absolute immunity" of the nobility for the "absolute immunity" of the "malicious or corrupt" judges, the "malicious or dishonest" prosecutor,  the "knowingly false testimony by police officers," the malicious, corrupt, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid actions of federal, state, local, and regional legislators and the malicious, corrupt, dishonest, sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid actions of "all persons -- governmental or otherwise -- who were integral parts of the judicial process"  acting under color of law to wit, ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION.
"Absolute corruption" of our "unalienable rights" is worse than living under Stalin, "Six million people are under correctional supervision in the U.S.—more than were in Stalin's gulags." "With 5% of the world's population, our country now houses nearly 25% of the world's reported prisoners." In the United States of America, the home of the free and the brave, you are FIVE times more likely to be in JAIL!!!!
Now the FEAR MONGER MIS-INFORMATIONISTS want you to believe that is because of misguided drug policies. And that IS WRONG. Everybody in the free world has been forced into the same misguided criminalization of DRUGS, at our insistence, to be able to trade with us. It is not Drugs, although in a country such as ours, with judicial sophistry unrestrained that supposedly promotes and holds individual liberty dearer than life itself, victimless crimes should never have been sanctioned by an independent judiciary looking out EXCLUSIVELY to protect and defend our personal liberties.
The REASON we have FIVE times as many people in jail than any other country in the free world is we do not invest in JUSTICE. Justice is not worth the effort in the view of the Black Robed Royalist, Article III and unconstitutional Judiciary. We have the Jane Crow Era, the Plea Bargain Era and the Exclusionary Rule Era, where JUSTICE is proclaimed too overgenerous, and nobody is thus answerable to it. A Judge can make up probable cause out of knowingly fraudulent information for an unrelated charge that results in a NOT "facially valid court order" and the signed warrant becomes unquestionable as regards the "property in rights"  of the innocent victim being deprived!!!! Prosecutors can hide behind the sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid denial of due process by way of the deprivation of exculpable evidence. The police can give "knowingly false testimony" and withhold evidence. There is nothing in the plea bargain era that the innocent victim can do to redress the JUSTIFIABLE grievance.
Just imagine negotiating for your LIFE in a plea bargain where the adversary can withhold exculpable evidence, assert "knowingly false testimony by police officers." The lone innocent accused victim has no hope for defense against "knowingly false testimony by police officers" and the denial of exculpable evidence they have no knowledge of. If you are luckily or unluckily in a capital murder trial where the death penalty has been an issue after 18 years, an investigator might just happen to find the evidence that clears your name as in Connick v Thompson, but do not expect an apology or any redress of grievances, there is no "property in rights" that our government of the People, by the People, for the People is bound to respect. We the People have asserted "property in rights" from the beginning with 1st and 7th amendment Justice, but our Black Robed Royalist, Article III Judiciary has with the sophistry unrestrained unconstitutionally DENIED "We the People" any "property in rights" via their judge made law of "absolute immunity"
The Judicial sophistry  of "absolute immunity" creates "absolute power" to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's unalienable rights.
United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for the states allowance of kidnapping, assault and murder without regard to the 14th Amendments security, Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) creating sophisticated racial segregation and the ongoing Jim Crow discrimination over the "necessary and proper" "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) separate and UNEQUAL, clarifying sophisticated segregation over the necessary and proper "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) reaffirmed Judicial sophisticated "absolute immunity," Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 409 (1976) prosecutorial sophisticated "absolute immunity," Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for forced sterilization, and Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for "knowingly false testimony by police officers," and "all persons that were integral in the Judicial Process." If that is not ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice, I can not imagine what is.
Not to mention the current malicious corruption of what We the People deemed "necessary and proper" with District of Columbia v. Heller, 554 U.S. 570 (2008), that sophisticatedly abolished gun control and put us all at risk of more Zimmerman/Martin like random violence, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010), that sophisticatedly abolished credibility in election campaign financing and put us all at risk of more Koch Brothers / FOX News misinformation that pollutes if not corrupts our political system and Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. ___ (2011) that sophisticatedly created impossibly "difficult problems of proof" for the redress of grievances for the deprivation of the "property in rights."
The FEAR MONGERS want us ARMED and READY, via District of Columbia v. Heller, for the inevitable conflict they are FOMENTING with the promulgation of FEARFUL MISINFORMATION being funded by Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. They want to destabilize the economy by crippling the American Economy with a crash of the currency based on a refusal to honor the Fourteenth Amendment "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, "The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or "Obamacare", is a United States federal statute LAW," shall not be questioned.
You want to fall for the sophistry that the Fourteenth Amendment's assertions were put there to reassure veterans of the Civil War. WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You and OTHERS want to believe that the Civil War Era citizen was economically ignorant? That is so FAR WRONG it is almost laughable. Those that had lived through the Civil War had REAL LIFE experience with the economic failure of a Government to support its legal tender. The "Greyback" (Confederate States of America dollar) had JUST COLLAPSED!!!! "The term greenback refers to legal tender, printed in green on one side and issued by the United States during the American Civil War which was backed not by the conventional gold or silver standard but by the credibility of the U.S. Government."
"The Confederate States of America dollar (or "Greyback") was first issued just before the outbreak of the American Civil War by the newly formed Confederacy. It was not backed by hard assets, but simply by a promise to pay the bearer after the war, on the prospect of Southern victory and independence.
As the war began to tilt against the Confederates, confidence in the currency diminished, and inflation followed. By the end of 1864, the currency was practically worthless."
The FEAR MONGERS don't care who wins as long as the War or UPHEAVAL or depression creates a DEMAND for a HARD CURRENCY again!!!!!! So we can go back to building their pyramids!!!!!!!!!! Neither The Egyptian Pyramids, The Palace of Versailles, The Taj Mahal or The Biltmore Estate did a DAM thing for the SLAVES that built them!!!!!
If you truly want to fix the "sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity," all you have to do is utilize your "executive privilege" direct your Attorney General to prosecute over the Black Robed Royalist Article III UNCONSTITUTIONAL assertions of "absolute immunity" and have your Solicitor General refuse to defend "absolute immunity" by accepting responsibility in a court of law for the sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid assertion of "absolute immunity," and defeat precedent with precedent.
 "Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Lord Acton 1887.
 Now codified as Title Criminal 18, U.S.C, § 241 & 242 into the United States Code of Law to hold UNQUALIFED "Whoever" criminally liable for the deprivation of rights under color of law.
 Now codified as Title Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 & 1985 into the United States Code of Law to hold UNQUALIFED "Every person" civilly liable for the deprivation of rights under color of law.
 The cause as confirmed in the Act of Parliament "Abolition of the Star Chamber" July 5, 1641, was abuse of "absolutely immune" discretion, Article I, § 9 "but the said judges have not kept themselves to the points limited by the said statute, but have undertaken to punish where no law doth warrant, and to make decrees for things having no such authority, and to inflict heavier punishments than by any law is warranted"
 "Fraus omnia corrumpit," fraud corrupts all. A principle according to which the discovery of fraud invalidates all aspects of a judicial decision. United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 65 (1878) is applicable here "But there is an admitted exception to this general rule in cases where, by reason of something done by the successful party to a suit, there was in fact no adversary trial or decision of the issue in the case. Where the unsuccessful party has been prevented from exhibiting fully his case by fraud or deception practiced on him by his opponent, as by keeping him away from court." This describes ABSOLUTE IMMUNITY'S effect PERFECTLY.
 Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 7 (1868), Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335 (1872), Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967), Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 409 (1976), Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978), Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) AND Connick, District Attorney, et al. v. Thompson No. 09–571 Decided March 29, 2011, TO NAME BUT A FEW!!!!!!
 The denial of the "The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, "the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly called the Affordable Care Act (ACA) or Obamacare," shall not be questioned."
 "The rule of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U. S. 83, arguably applies in three quite different situations. Each involves the discovery, after trial, of information which had been known to the prosecution but unknown to the defense.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 241
 § 1983
 § 9
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.