Source: https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/053017zor.html?utm_source=Cornell+Legal+Information+Institute+%5BLII%5D&utm_campaign=11d331994c-Bulletin_Opinion_2017_05_30&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_74379d6e9c-11d331994c-133149241
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 00:39:15+00:00

Document:
16-24DICKSON, MARGARET, ET AL. V. RUCHO, ROBERT, ET AL.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of North Carolina for further consideration in light of Cooper v. Harris, 581 U. S. ____ (2017).
16-1181JAFFE, ROBERT J. V. ROBERTS, CHIEF JUSTICE, ET AL.
Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U. S. C. §1, and since the qualified Justice is of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U. S. C. §2109, which provides that under these circumstances “the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court.” The Chief Justice, Justice Kennedy, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, Justice Alito, Justice Sotomayor, and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
16-8629ARUNGA, JAMES A. V. OBAMA, BARACK H., ET AL.
Because the Court lacks a quorum, 28 U. S. C. §1, and since the qualified Justices are of the opinion that the case cannot be heard and determined at the next Term of the Court, the judgment is affirmed under 28 U. S. C. §2109, which provides that under these circumstances “the court shall enter its order affirming the judgment of the court from which the case was brought for review with the same effect as upon affirmance by an equally divided court.” Justice Kennedy, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer, and Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
16M134BRITTON, RANDY A. V. DRUMMER BOY HOMES ASSN.
16-1011WESTERNGECO LLC V. ION GEOPHYSICAL CORP.
The Acting Solicitor General is invited to file a brief in this case expressing the views of the United States. Justice Alito took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
16-8470MAQAGI, WONGA V. HORIZON LAMPS, INC., ET AL.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until June 20, 2017, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.
16-980HUSTED, OH SEC. OF STATE V. RANDOLPH INSTITUTE, ET AL.
15-1223SOUTHWEST SECURITIES V. SEGNER, MILO H.
16-830EL-NAHAL, HASSAN V. YASSKY, DAVID, ET AL.
16-919TEXAS V. McGUIRE, SEAN M.
16-1156WADE, BOOKER T. V. STEVENS, ARLENE, ET AL.
16-1164BLDG. INDUS. ASSN. OF BAY AREA V. SAN RAMON, CA, ET AL.
16-1174THARP, SUKCHA V. SESSIONS, ATT'Y GEN., ET AL.
16-1213ESCAMILLA, DAVID V. M2 TECHNOLOGY, INC.
16-1233CONWAY, SHERIFF, ET AL. V. SHUFORD, JUSTIN, ET AL.
16-1240SHORE, MICHAEL W. V. LEE, MICHELLE K.
16-1263CAMPBELL, RUSSEL V. LAMAR INSTITUTE, ET AL.
16-1268HINES, JOSEPH V. PAXTON, DEBRA, ET AL.
16-1294TRESCOTT, WILLIAM B. V. DEPT. OF TRANSPORTATION, ET AL.
16-8451WIMBUSH, THERIAN C. V. GEORGIA, ET AL.
16-8506MUA, JOSEPHAT V. O'NEAL LAW FIRM, ET AL.
16-8513SMITH, WAYNE D. V. SHARIAT, AZIZ, ET AL.
16-8517WALKER, ALEXANDER V. BONDI, ATT'Y GEN. OF FL, ET AL.
16-8528NELSON, FRANKLIN S. V. FLEMMER, JON S.
16-8537KRUPCZAK, LISA A. V. DLA PIPER LLP, ET AL.
16-8538MUA, JOSEPHAT V. BOARD OF EDUCATION, ET AL.
16-8539MUA, JOSEPHAT V. FROSH, ATT'Y GEN. OF MD, ET AL.
16-8549STURGIS, DONALD V. UNKNOWN SUARDINI, ET AL.
16-8601VILLALTA, SELOMI M. V. EOIR, ET AL.
16-8660FURNACE, EDWARD T. V. GIURBINO, G., ET AL.
16-8676NASH, LINDA A. V. BANK OF AMERICA, ET AL.
16-8683COLEMAN, DARLENE V. STARBUCKS COFFEE CO.
16-8755BROADWAY, ROBERT C. V. OFFICE OF DISTRICT ATT'Y, ET AL.
16-8758SMILEY, ANDRE V. FERGUSON, SUPT., BENNER, ET AL.
16-8828GUZMAN, JOSE E. V. JONES, SEC., FL DOC, ET AL.
16-8838WARNER, ROBERT H. V. OHIO, ET AL.
16-8880STEWART, FENYANG A. V. LEE, MICHELLE K.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied. Justice Gorsuch took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
16-8554HOLMES, JOEL C. V. SATTERBERG, DANIEL, ET AL.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and this petition.
The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of habeas corpus is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
16-962GROOMS, LINDA V. HUNTER HOLMES CENTER, ET AL.
16-7181BARTLETT, ANGEL V. ALLEGAN COUNTY COURTS, ET AL.
The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice Kagan took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice Sotomayor took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE D-2971 IN THE MATTER OF CHRISTOPHER PATRICK SULLIVAN Due to mistaken identity, the order suspending Christopher Patrick Sullivan of Boston, Massachusetts from the practice of law in this Court, dated May 15, 2017, is vacated and the Rule to Show Cause issued on that date is discharged.

References: V. 
 v. 
 V. 
 §1
 §2109
 V. 
 §1
 §2109
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.