Source: http://m.memorize.com/constitutional-law
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 14:35:06+00:00

Document:
Marbury v. Madison Does petitioner have a right to the commission?
Marbury v. Madison If he has a right, is there a remedy at law to realize it?
Marbury v. Madison If there is a remedy, is it one that can be issued from the Supreme Court?
Ex parte McCardle If appellate jurisdiction is derived from the Constitution, can Congress pass a law to limit appellate jurisdiction?
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld Does the Court have jurisdiction to hear apppeals from Guantanamo detainees?
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld Did the president act legally in establishing the military commissions?
Hamdan v Rumsfeld Were the procedures followed by the military commissions in violation of either the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) or the Geneva Conventions?
Hamdan v Rumsfeld Is conspiracy an offense legally triable by a military commission?
Baker v. Carr Is legislative reapportionment a political question and therefore non-justiciable?
Nixon v. US Dos the Impeachment review constitute a nonjusticiable political question?
Flast v. Cohen Does a taxpayer have standing to sue the government to prevent an unconstitutional use of taxpayer funds.
McCulloch v. Maryland Whether or not Congress has power to establish a national bank?
McCulloch v. Maryland Did the state exceed its powers in seeking to tax a federal entity?
Scott v. Sandford Is Dred Scott citizen or slave?
Scott v. Sandford Does the Supreme Court have jurisdiction over the case?
US v. Darby Can Congress set regulations to minimum wage and overtime pay in pursuant to interstate commerce or in violation of the 10th amendment?
National League of Cities v. Usery Can Congress regulate working conditions under the Commerce Clause, or does the 10th Amendment bar it?
Hammer v. Dagenhart Does Congress have the authority to regulate child labor pursuant to the interstate commerce clause?
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee Does Congress have the power to expand the Supreme Court appellate jurisdiction?
Eakin v. Raub Should state laws be voided by court decisions?
Marbury v. Madison President Adam's appointments were not delivered by Sec. of State John Marshall. James Madison, under orders from newly elected President Jefferson, refused to deliver at least 5 commissions. William Marbury and 3 others petitioned Supreme Court to issue a "writ of mandamus" (command public official to do their job) Sec. 13 of 1789 Judiciary Act gives the court the power to issue writs of mandamus.
Ex parte McCardle After civil war, radical republican congress enacts reconstruction laws. A journalist publishes articles that oppose the reconstruction laws. He is arrested for publishing allegedly libelous articles and petitions for a writ of habeas corpus. Congress enacts laws to repeal 1867 Habeas Corpus Act.
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld Bin Laden's former driver, a detainee at Guantanamo Bay, tries to stop the proceedings (charged with cnosiparcy to commit offenses triable by a military commission) before the military commission by filing for a writ of habeas corpus in a federal district court.
Baker v. Carr States were under no federal mandate to reapportion because of Colgrove decision. Citizens and organizations wanted to force legislatures to reapportion but could not do so under the guarantee clause so they tried to 14th amendment equal protection clause.
Nixon v. US Federal District Judge was convicted of a felony. House of Reps voted for impeachment and went to senate for trial. A senate committee heard the evidence and reported findings. The district judge challenged the committee rule on the grounds that it violated impeachment clause of the constitution.
Flast v. Cohen Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 allowed states to apply to the fed government for grants to assist in education of low-income families. Some of the funds disbursed from the act were used to finance textbooks in both religious and sectarian schools, violating the First Amendment.
McCulloch v. Maryland Congress established a national bank. Maryland, who didn't like the bank, passed a law that taxed the special paper the national bank must use. A cashier in the national bank refused to pay the tax.
Scott v. Sandford A slave was taken to a free state to live for a while by his owner. They eventually returned to a slave state. The slave sues his owner's widow for his freedom.
Hammer v. Dagenhart Congress wanted to regulate child labor by banning products of that labor from interstate commerce. Under the new law, children between ages of 14-16 couldn't work more than 8 hrs/day, overnight or more than 6 days a week. A man whose children would not be able to work anymore argued the law was unconstitutiona.
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee Virgina confiscated land from British Martin because of a VA law that specified no enemy could inherit land. Martin began selling tracts of the land resulting in a suit contesting the title.
Marbury v. Madison Establishes Judicial Review. He has a right to the commission, he is entitled to a remedy, but cannot be issued by Supreme Court because Sect. 13 of 1789 Judiciary Act sought to expand the original jurisdiction, which cannot be done. The constitution is the supreme law of the land.
Ex party McCardle Congress can amend appellate jurisdiction, not original jurisdiction. The court had no jurisdiction in the case because Congress rescinded the court's appellate jurisdiction.
Hammer v. Dagenhart The law is void and unconstitutional because it would expand the commerce clause and take over states rights.
US v. Darby Congress has constitutional power to regulate commerce. They argued that the purpose of FLSA was to prevent states from using substandard labor practices for economic advantage.
National Leave of Cities v. Usery Congress cannot exercise its power so as to impair on the state's integrity or their ability to function effectively. Compensation of state employees should be seperate and independent from Congress' power to regulate business commerce.
Martin v. Hunter's Lessee Congress has the authority to give court appellate jurisdiction. There is no clause in the Constitution that restrains or limits appellate jurisdiction.
Eakin v. Raub Legislature has every right as judiciary to put construction on constitution. Interpretation and support of Constitution is responsibility of every officer of government.
Hamdan v. Rumsfeld Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 doesn't explicitly discuss the jurisdiction over pending cases in court.
Baker v. Carr No, it is not a political question and therefore justiciable. established the 6 factor test to determine political questions.
Nixon v. US The claim is not justiciable because the constitution commits sole power to the senate, and legislatures only check is on the judiciary is by impeachment.
McCulloch v. Maryland Marshall shares opinion of the court. As long as what Congress does is rationally related to a Constitutional objective, the means itself is Constitutional. There are express powers in the taxing/spending clause "elastic clause", States cannot tax because acts upon institutions created by people whom they claim no control over.
Scott v. Sandford The court lacks jurisdiction because blacks cannot be citizens of the US. The Constitution means only the territories that were there during the time of the adoption, which was the framers intent.
Clark's concurring decision (Baker v Carr) There is a problem and the democratic process has failed, no other routes have worked.
6 factor test Does the constitution text commit the issue to another branch of government?, Are there judicially discoverable and manageable standards for revolving the question?, would it embarrass the gov if diff branches have diff views?
Standing The person bringing the suit has to have a significant stake in the claim, they have to have been affected in some way in order to offer the best arguments before the Court.
Mootness The issue has already been resolved before being heard by the court. Exceptions: issue capable of repetition (pregnancy) or defendant voluntarily ceases conduct.
Holmes' Dissent (Hammer) Congress can advance commerce clause, if it hurts states rights then that is an indirect effect.
Stare Decisis "let the decision stand", justices should decide based on previously established precedent.
Frothingham v. Mellon Taxpayer did not want to see her tax dollars spent on program to reduce infant mortality rates. Court ruled that she did not have standing to bring litigation.
Strader v. Graham Slaves taken from Kentucky to Ohio and back to Kentucky. Status of slave depended on state they were brought back to. Court ruled they had no jurisdiction.
Article 4 Guarantee Clause "The US shall guarantee to every state in the Union a Republican Form of government"

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.