Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/403432967/O-Callaghan-v-Regents-Filed
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 00:41:35+00:00

Document:
9 Amendment rights at that time.
14 to not join or pay a union because the Supreme Court had not yet recognized that right.
24 employees. Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 3570, 3571.1(e), 3574, and 3578.
27 dues previously deducted from their paychecks.
4 California, Santa Barbara (“UCSB”). She resides in Santa Barbara County, California.
7 resides in Los Angeles County, California.
13 94607 in Alameda County, California.
24 12. This case raises claims under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the U.S.
26 U.S.C. § 1331 and 28 U.S.C. § 1343.
28 claims occurred in the Central District of California. 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2).
3 continuously employed by UCSB since August 2009.
5 join the Union but, instead, was forced to pay agency, or “fair share,” fees to the Union.
10 an application joining the Union and authorizing it to deduct union dues from her paycheck.
13 letter to UCSB requesting that it stop deducting union dues from her paycheck.
17 the Union and UCSB. The letter did not explain what those terms were.
23 that it immediately stop deducting union dues from O’Callaghan’s paycheck.
27 continue to deduct union dues from O’Callaghan’s paycheck.
2 that it would continue to deduct union dues from O’Callaghan’s paycheck.
7 that the deductions be stopped.
8 25. Misraje has been employed by UCLA since May 2015.
10 authorizing it to deduct dues from her paycheck.
16 when that time window would occur.
22 all such requests must come through the Union under California law.
25 during a time window.
2 terminated; however, the Union continued to receive dues deducted from her paycheck.
4 that it stop deducting union dues from her paycheck.
6 all such requests must come through the Union under California law.
8 that it stop deducting union dues from her paycheck.
11 sent a letter to UCLA requesting the same.
16 she gave notice pursuant to the terms of her union application.
20 anniversary date of the signed agreement.
24 ($53) dollars per month, despite Misraje’s repeated requests that the deductions be stopped.
8 U.S. 449 (1958); Gitlow v. New York, 268 U.S. 652 (1925).
11 their paychecks by the Regents and the Union.
13 paychecks under color of state law.
18 an exclusive collective bargaining agreement negotiated with a state entity.
23 Union violates their First Amendment rights to free speech and freedom of association.
24 Janus v. AFSCME, 138 S. Ct. 2448, 2486 (2018).
2 Regents immediately to stop deducting union dues from their paycheck.
5 Plaintiffs’ paychecks without their affirmative consent.
11 the rights and other legal relations of interested parties.
24 dismissal of members from the union. Cal. Gov’t Code § 3515.5.
26 provision” regarding how and when government employees can withdraw from a union.
27 Cal. Gov’t Code § 3515.
6 Code §§ 3513(i) and 3583.
21 membership. Janus, 138 S. Ct. at 2486.
24 by the false information and false dichotomy given to them, was not “freely given.” Id.
27 the commencement of their employment.
6 be universally condemned.” Janus, 138 S. Ct. at 2463.
11 2464 (2018) (quoting West Virginia Bd. of Ed. v. Barnette, 319 U. S. 624, 633 (1943)).
16 U.S. 609, 623 (1984)) (internal quotation marks omitted).
22 employer.” Janus, 138 S. Ct. at 2460.
27 unions. Janus, 138 S. Ct. 2473.
3 conditions of Plaintiffs’ employment with the Union. Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 3570 and 3574.
5 representative in negotiating the terms and conditions of their employment.
9 for the State of California.
15 Plaintiffs for collective bargaining purposes.
18 representative of Plaintiffs for collective bargaining purposes.
25 violation of the First Amendment.
5 no other unions have been recognized. Cal. Gov’t Code § 3574.
7 shall serve as the exclusive representative of Plaintiffs. Cal. Gov’t Code § 3570.
10 by the Union or not. Cal. Gov’t Code §§ 3571.1(e) and 3578.
23 union dues from Plaintiffs’ paychecks.
25 that they stop is a violation of the First Amendment.
19 relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
US Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Division Memo on Recording Police, re Christopher Sharp v. Baltimore City Police Department, et. al.

References: § 1331
 § 1343
 v. 
 v. 
 § 3515
 § 3515
 v. 
 § 3574
 § 3570
 v.