Source: https://opencasebook.org/casebooks/28884-an-introduction-to-the-law-of-corporations-cases-and-materials-fall-2017/sections/4-fiduciary-duties-of-directors
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 00:18:41+00:00

Document:
Although the Delaware code - and the corporate codes of all the other states for that matter - do a good job of describing the corporate form and the mechanics of operating this form, with the exception of perhaps §144, the code says precious little about the standards to which boards of directors who are managing the corporation will be held. This is so because corporate fiduciary duties are a product of the common law and not statute. In the following sections we examine the various core duties of corporate directors. Although these duties are fewer in number than the fiduciary obligations of agents, they are entirely consistent.
William B. WEINBERGER, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. UOP, INC., et al., Defendants Below, Appellees.
BENIHANA OF TOKYO, INC., individually and on behalf of Benihana, Inc., Plaintiff Below-Appellant, v. BENIHANA, INC., John E. Abdo, Norman Becker, Darwin Dornbush, Max Pine, Yoshihiro Sano, Joel Schwartz, Robert B. Sturges, Takanori Yoshimoto, and BFC Financial Corporation, Defendants Below-Appellees.
Irving Fliegler, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v. John C. Lawrence et al., Defendants Below, Appellees.
JOHN CALMA, Derivatively on Behalf of CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MARK B. TEMPLETON, THOMAS F. BOGAN, GARY E. MORIN, NANCI E. CALDWELL, STEPHEN M. DOW, MURRAY J. DEMO, GODFREY R. SULLIVAN, ASIFF S. HIRJI, and ROBERT D. DALEO, Defendants, and CITRIX SYSTEMS, INC., a Delaware corporation, Nominal Defendant.
Broz v. Cellular Info. Systems Inc.

References: §144
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.