Source: https://www.landuselawinpa.com/topic/appellate-procedure/page/2/
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 14:28:08+00:00

Document:
A notice of appeal was quashed for failing to set forth the basis for the appeal.
Therres v. Zoning Hearing Board of the Borough of Rose Valley, 947 A.2d 226 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2008).
Borough of Jenkintown v. Board of Commissioners of Abington Twp.
Appeal of approval moot where applicant essentially abandons appealed approvals by obtaining new approvals for the same project.
DeFilippo v. Cranberry Twp. Bd. of Supervisors, 49 A.3d 939 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2012).
When reviewing a deemed approval, the trial court must not conduct appellate review; rather, de novo review is required and the trial court must make its own findings.
Renumbering of section numbers from time of advertisement to time of adoption does not violate due process rights. Failure to record an ordinance in the ordinance book within the statutorily required time period renders the ordinance ineffective, but not invalid.
Bartkowski Inv. Group v. Bd. of Comm’rs of Marple Twp., 18 A.3d 1259 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011).
A person who is not a party to an action may appeal a zoning board decision if they have a legally enforceable interest that is not adequately represented.
Atticks v. Lancaster Township Zoning Hearing Board, 915 A.2d 713 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2007).
Doctrine of collateral estoppel applied in appeal of variance where the trial court previously ruled upon a similar variance application for the same property.
Ulsh v. Zoning Hearing Bd., 22 A.3d 244 (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2011).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.