Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8929948B2/en
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 08:05:49+00:00

Document:
2009-08-27 Assigned to ROSEMOUNT INC. reassignment ROSEMOUNT INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HURD, RONALD F., GRUNIG, CHRISTINA A., VANDERAA, JOEL D.
A wireless process communication adapter is provided. The adapter includes a housing having a plurality of openings. An end cap is coupled to a first opening of the plurality of openings. A field device coupling is disposed at the second of the plurality of openings. The housing, end cap and field device coupling define a chamber therein. At least one circuit board is disposed within the chamber, the circuit board has wireless communication circuitry disposed thereon and is coupleable to a field device through the field device coupling. In one aspect, substantially all remaining volume in the chamber is filled with a solid material. In another aspect, an explosion-proof barrier is provided in the field device coupling. Combinations of the aspects are also provided.
The present application is based on and claims the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 61/073,086, filed Jun. 17, 2008, the content of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In industrial settings, control systems are used to monitor and control inventories of industrial and chemical processes and the like. Typically, the control system performs these functions using field devices distributed at key locations in the industrial process and coupled to the control circuitry in the control room by a process control loop. The term “field device” refers to any device that performs a function in a distributed control or process monitoring system including all devices currently known, or yet to be known, used in the measurement, control, and monitoring of industrial processes.
Some field devices include a transducer. A transducer is understood to mean either a device that generates an output signal based on a physical input or that generates a physical output based on an input signal. Typically, transducers transform an input into an output having different form. Types of transducers include various analytical equipment, pressure sensors, thermistors, thermocouples, strain gauges, flow transmitters, digital valve controllers, flowmeters, flow computers, positioners, actuators, solenoids, indicator lights, and others.
Typically, each field device also includes communication circuitry that is used for communicating with a process control room or other circuitry over a process control loop. In some installations, the process control loop is also used to deliver a regulated current and/or voltage to the field device for powering the field device. Process control loop also carries data, either in an analog or digital format.
Traditionally, analog field devices have been connected to the control room by two-wire process control current loops with each device connected to the control room by a single two-wire control loop. Typically, a voltage differential is maintained between the two wires within a range of voltages from 12-45 volts for analog mode and 9-50 for digital mode. Some analog field devices transmit a signal to the control room by modulating the current running through the current loop to a current that is proportional to the sensed process variable. Other analog field devices can perform an action under the control of the control room by controlling the magnitude of the current through the loop. In addition to, or in the alternative, the process control loop can also carry digital signals used for communication with field devices.
In some installations, wireless technologies have begun to be used to communicate with field devices. Wireless operation simplifies field device wiring and setup. However, the majority of field devices is hardwired to a process control room and does not use wireless communication techniques.
In order to operate an industrial process plant, field devices must often carry hazardous location approval ratings. There are different types of ratings and, to be widely adopted, a wireless field device adapter should be able to attach to each such field device without compromising the hazardous location approval rating of that field device.
One of these approval ratings is known as an explosion-proof or explosion-protected rating. The purpose of an explosion-proof enclosure is to contain an explosion should flammable gas enter the enclosure and ignite. If the enclosure fails to contain the explosion, it could ignite surrounding gases with catastrophic results. One challenge facing wireless device manufacturers is how to propagate a wireless signal through an enclosure capable of withstanding explosive pressures. Such enclosures are often large and made of metals such as steel or aluminum. Currently available wireless transmission techniques include thick glass antenna radomes or explosion-proof coaxial feed-throughs with energy limiting circuitry and fitted with relatively fragile “rubber duck” antennas. Plastic radomes alone are not believed to be capable of withstanding explosive pressures nor are they believed to meet the chemical, environmental, and impact resistance requirements of the approval agencies.
Another type of approval rating is known as intrinsic safety (IS). An intrinsically safe device prevents ignition of flammable gases by limiting the amount of energy present in the electronics and by ensuring that electronic components are spaced far enough apart to prevent arcing in the event of an electrical fault. The heat generated by electronic components is also controlled. Making the electronics of a device intrinsically safe tends to drive up the number of components as well as increase circuit board size. This also poses a challenge when the form factor of a device must be minimized.
In order for a wireless communication adapter to be used in explosion-proof installations, it must be explosion-protected itself and it must provide an explosion-proof barrier at the connection between the two devices. For an intrinsically safe installation, the wireless communication circuitry must be intrinsically safe as well. The ability to attach such an adapter to any device also drives the form factor. Industrial devices, such as field devices, can be installed in many configurations and are often disposed in tight spaces. This necessitates a small and unobtrusive design. To achieve this, it is beneficial for the antenna to be integral to the wireless communication adapter and for the circuit board size to be minimized. This complicates design for installations that require either explosion-proof certification or intrinsically-safe certification.
Providing a wireless communication adapter for field devices that is relatively small and unobtrusive yet still able to facilitate compliance with explosion-proof certifications and intrinsic safety would advance the art of wireless process communication.
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a process-wired field device operably coupled to the wireless communication adapter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 shows a simplified cross-sectional view of a field device and wireless process communication adapter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional diagrammatic view of a wireless process communication adapter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
Embodiments of the present invention generally provide a wireless transmitter that may be attached to a wired field device that is either explosion-proof or intrinsically safe without compromising approval ratings of such field device. The wireless communication adapter is configured to provide explosion protection and also preferably contain intrinsically safe electronics. The adapter preferably includes an explosion-proof barrier at the connection point to the wired device and includes electronics that are fully encapsulated.
FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic view of a process-wired field device 12 operably coupled to a wireless communication adapter 14, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. While field device 12 is illustrated in FIG. 1 as a process fluid pressure transmitter, such as that sold under the trade designation Model 3051S, available from Emerson Process Management of Chanhassen, Minn., any suitable field device may be used. Typically, a field device includes a sensor module, such as sensor module 16, and an electronics module, such as electronics module 18. Further, as set forth above, field device 12 is often designed for compliance with explosion-proof regulations. Further, the design of electronics within field device 12 can be in accordance with an intrinsic safety requirement, such as one or more of the portions of the standard promulgated by Factory Mutual Research in October 1998 entitled APPROVAL STANDARD INTRINSICALLY SAFE APPARATUS AND ASSOCIATED APPARATUS FOR USE IN CLASS I, II, AND III, DIVISION 1 HAZARDOUS (CLASSIFIED) LOCATIONS, CLASS NUMBER 3610. Field device 12 typically includes a sensor, such as a pressure sensor, in sensor module 16 which transduces a process fluid characteristic, such as pressure, and provides an electrical indication of that process fluid variable to electronics module 18. Electronics module 18 then communicates process variable information over a process communication loop which typically couples via input 20.
As described above, it is becoming advantageous to provide additional communication abilities, such as a wireless communication ability, to process wired field devices. By providing a wireless process communication adapter, such as process communication adapter 14, additional digital information can be conveyed beyond that transmitted through the process wired connection. Such information may be communicated to a separate monitoring or diagnostic system or application for analysis. Further, the simple provision of an additional communication resource, such as adapter 14, also allows for redundant communication. It is important for process communication adapter 14 to be coupleable to field devices without adversely affecting the assembly's ability to continue to meet explosion-proof and/or intrinsic safety requirements.
FIG. 2 shows a simplified cross-sectional view of field device 12 and wireless process communication adapter 30 in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. Field device 12 is coupled to process communication loop 22 through input 20 and conduit 11. Examples of process communication loops include the Highway Addressable Remote Transducer (HART®) protocol and the FOUNDATION™ Fieldbus protocol. However, other wired process communication protocols are known. In the example of a process variable transmitter, field device 12 includes a process variable sensor 50 which is connected to measurement circuitry 52 to measure a process variable. Transmitter circuitry 54 is configured to receive the process variable and communicate the process variable onto the two-wire process control loop 22 using known techniques. Field device 12 couples to two-wire process control loop 22 through connection block 106. Wireless communication adapter 30 couples to two-wire process control loop 22 through connection block 106 and is mounted to the housing of field device 12, for example, through threaded connections 123 and 109. The chassis of the wireless process communication adapter 30 couples to an electrical ground connector 110 of field device 12 through wire 108. Field device 12 includes two-wire process connection block 102 which couples to connection 112 from wireless process communication adapter 30. Housing 120 of wireless process communication adapter 30 carries an antenna 126 which couples to wireless communication circuitry of the wireless process communication adapter 30. A radio-frequency (RF) transparent end cap 124 can be used to sealably couple to housing 120 to allow transmission of RF signals therethrough. In the arrangement shown in FIG. 2, five electrical connections are provided to the radio-frequency adapter, which include four loop connections along with an electrical ground connection.
FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional diagrammatic view of a wireless process communication adapter in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As illustrated in FIG. 3, wireless process communication adapter preferably includes a cylindrical, metal enclosure 120 with a large opening 150 at one end to accommodate radio-frequency transparent radome or end cap 124, and a relatively small opening 152 at the other end to accommodate field device coupling 122. Electronics 154 reside within cavity 130 preferably on a pair of printed circuit boards 132, 134. The electronics preferably include wireless communication circuitry to allow wireless process communication adapter to communicate in accordance with one or more wireless communication protocols. Examples of suitable wireless process communication protocols include: wireless networking technologies (such as IEEE 802.11b wireless access points and wireless networking devices built by Linksys of Irvine, Calif.); cellular or digital networking technologies (such as Microburst® by Aeris Communications Inc. of San Jose, Calif.); ultra wide band, free space optics, Global System for Mobile Communications (GSM), General Packet Radio Service (GPRS); Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA); spread spectrum technology, infrared communications techniques; SMS (Short Messaging Service/text messaging); a known Bluetooth Specification, such as Bluetooth Core Specification Version 1.1 (Feb. 22, 2001), available from the Bluetooth SIG (www.bluetooth.com); and the Wireless HART® Specification published by the Hart Communication Foundation, for example. Relevant portions of the Wireless HART® Specification include: HCF_Spec 13, revision 7.0; HART Specification 65—Wireless Physical Layer Specification; HART Specification 75—TDMA Data Link Layer Specification (TDMA refers to Time Division Multiple Access); HART Specification 85—Network Management Specification; HART Specification 155—Wireless Command Specification; and HART Specification 290—Wireless Devices Specification.
The electronics on each circuit board 132, 134 are preferably mounted with spacing around them, and between the circuit boards, to facilitate flow of a potting compound. With the enclosure sealed, a potting 136 is injected into chamber 130 through passageway 156 until the enclosure is full. Any suitable potting compound can be used, but it is important for the potting material itself to meet the requirements of the approval agencies, which include suitable chemical resistance, thermal endurance at hot and cold operating temperatures, as well as other relevant parameters. Radome 124, enclosure 120, and field device coupling 122 provide a weather-tight shell for potting 136.
Field device coupling 122 provides a method of attaching directly to field device 12. Feedthrough assembly 140 preferably also serves as an explosion-proof barrier at the connection point. If flammable gases enter the enclosure of the field device and ignite, feedthrough assembly 140 will contain the explosion. Wire leads 158, 160 pass through feedthrough assembly 140. The interior of the coupling is filled with a potting capable of withstanding explosive pressure. The interior of the coupling includes a shoulder 166 that helps retain the potting in the coupling. Field device coupling 122 can also include a union and/or elbow to provide adjustability, as desired. In one embodiment, the explosion-proof barrier is provided by running wires 158, 160 through a cemented joint 164 in feedthrough assembly 140. This cemented joint 164 is created by filling feedthrough assembly 140 with a potting capable of withstanding explosive pressure.
In another embodiment feedthrough assembly 140 can be constructed from a thermoset epoxy hollow cylinder 162. Wires 158, 160 are run through cylinder 162, which is then filled with potting 164. The feedthrough assembly 140 slides into field device coupling 122 with a shoulder 166 of field device coupling 122 bearing against a surface 168 of feedthrough assembly 140. The outside diameter of cylindrical feedthrough assembly 140 and the inside diameter of field device coupling 122 as well as the length of both are tightly controlled to maintain a gap 170 that is long and narrow enough to extinguish any burning gases trying to escape. The outside diameter of feedthrough 140 also preferably includes an O-ring 172 for environmental sealing.
Wireless process communication adapter 30 thus preferably uses encapsulation and adaptation of a feedthrough assembly to provide explosion and environmental protection and to reduce the spacing required between electronic components for intrinsic safety protection. Intrinsic safety spacing requirements are less stringent when the space between the components is filled with potting. This allows the entire device to be miniaturized more effectively. Encapsulation achieves explosion protection by excluding flammable gases entirely. The electronics of wireless process communication adapter 30 are completely surrounded by potting and therefore protected from the environment.
The plastic and potting each have strengths and weaknesses and are used together to compensate for the weaknesses of the other. The plastic can be used to provide a rigid shell and ultraviolet and flame resistance that are not available from most potting compounds. The potting supports the plastic from within, thereby improving its impact resistance. The potting provides chemical resistance required for agency approvals and renders the watertight and dust tight ratings moot, as it is virtually impossible for water and dust to reach the electronics. The potting also makes the electronics virtually immune to vibration and the tighter intrinsic safety spacing allows for smaller circuit boards. This design results in a compact package with only one explosion-proof joint where the leads exit process communication adapter 30. Antenna 126 is kept within the device, precluding the need for an external antenna with the explosion protection that entails.
wherein the field device coupling includes an explosion-proof barrier and wherein the explosion-proof barrier includes a pressure-blocking feedthrough.
2. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 1, wherein the wireless communication circuitry is intrinsically safe.
3. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 1, wherein the solid material is an epoxy.
4. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 1, wherein the housing is cylindrically shaped.
5. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 1, wherein the housing is constructed at least in part from metal.
6. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 5, wherein a chassis of the wireless process communication adapter is coupleable to an electrical ground of the field device.
7. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 1, wherein the pressure blocking feedthrough includes a surface that bears against a shoulder of the field device coupling.
8. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 1, wherein the pressure-blocking feedthrough has an outer diameter that cooperates with an inner diameter of the field device coupling to form a gap sized to extinguish burning gasses.
9. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 1, and further comprising an o-ring disposed about the field device coupling.
10. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 1, wherein the explosion-proof barrier includes a cemented joint passing conductors therethrough.
11. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 1, wherein the at least one circuit board includes a plurality of circuit boards disposed substantially parallel to one another and separated by a gap that is filled with the solid material.
wherein the field device coupling is configured to include an explosion-proof barrier and wherein the explosion-proof barrier includes a pressure-blocking feedthrough.
13. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 12, wherein the explosion blocking feedthrough includes a surface that bears against a shoulder of the field device coupling.
14. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 12, and further comprising an o-ring disposed about the field device coupling.
15. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 12, wherein the explosion-proof barrier includes a cemented joint passing conductors therethrough.
16. The wireless process communication adapter of claim 12, wherein the pressure-blocking feedthrough has an outer diameter that cooperates with an inner diameter of the field device coupling to form a gap sized to extinguish burning gasses.
"Every Little Helps," Economist, vol. 278, No. 8469, p. 78, Mar. 18, 2006.
"Heat Pipe-Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat-pipe, Mar. 31, 2006.
"Heat Pipe—Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia," http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Heat—pipe, Mar. 31, 2006.
"High Power Single PSE Controller With Internal Switch," Linear Technology LTC4263-1, p. 1-20.
"Mechatronic Drives in Mobile Hydraulics," Internet Article, Soncebox News. No. 4, Oct. 2004.
"Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and The Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority" for PCT/US2008/011451 dated Mar. 30, 2009.
"System Checks Faraway Machines' Health," by J. Strothman, InTech with Industrial Computing, Feb. 2002, pp. 42-43.
"Thermal Design and Heat Sink Manufacturing & Testing-Total Thermal and Heat Sink . . . ," http://www.enertron-inc.com/enertron-products/integrated-heat-sink.php, Mar. 31, 2006.
"Thermal Design and Heat Sink Manufacturing & Testing—Total Thermal and Heat Sink . . . ," http://www.enertron-inc.com/enertron-products/integrated-heat-sink.php, Mar. 31, 2006.
"Wireless R&D Aims to Boost Traffic," by M. Moore, InTech with Industrial Computing, Feb. 2002, pp. 40-41.
2002 Microchip Technology Inc., "Stand-Alone CAN Controller with SPI(TM) Interface," pp. 1-75, Mar. 1, 2002.
2002 Microchip Technology Inc., "Stand-Alone CAN Controller with SPI™ Interface," pp. 1-75, Mar. 1, 2002.
3rd Office Action dated Jan. 17, 2014 in Chinese Patent Application No. 200980122613.X, 9 pgs. including English translation.
Chinese Office Action from CN200980122761.1, dated Aug. 31, 2012.
Chinese Office Action from CN200980122761.1, dated Dec. 12, 2013.
Chinese Office Action from CN200980122835.1, dated Jul. 3, 2012.
Chinese Office Action from CN2009801228535.1, dated Jul. 3, 2012.
Communication from corresponding EP application No. 08837236.2 dated Nov. 3, 2010.
Communication from EP Application No. 12787964.1, dated Jun. 25, 2014.
Communication pursuant to Rules 161 and 162 EPC from European patent application No. 09767057.4 dated Jan. 26, 2011.
Communication pursuant to Rules 161 and 162 EPC from European patent application No. 09767063.2 dated Jan. 28, 2011.
Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC for application Serial No. EP 09767062.4, dated Jan. 27, 2011.
Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC for application Serial No. EP 10752246.8, dated May 3, 2012.
Communication Pursuant to Rules 161(1) and 162 EPC for application Serial No. EP 10765871.8, dated Apr. 27, 2012.
Conclusion and Notification on rehearing for Russian patent application No. 2006145434/09 issued on Sep. 17, 2010.
Decision of Rejection (final rejection) for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-514604, dated Jan. 29, 2013, 8 pages.
Decision on refusal to grant a patent for invention for Russian patent application No. 2006145434, filed May 5, 2005.
Decision on Refusal to Grant from Russian patent application No. 2006145434 dated Feb. 18, 2011.
English machine translation of JP2004208476 A.
Examination Report for the related Singapore application No. 201009226-0 dated Oct. 12, 2012.
Examination Report from the corresponding Singapore patent application No. 2010092278 dated Jan. 7, 2013.
Examination Report of the European Patent Office in Application No. 05724190.3 dated Aug. 1, 2007.
Examiner's Consultation from European patent Application No. 05724190.3, dated Jun. 30, 2008.
Fifth Office Action from Chinese patent application No. 200580014212.4, dated Nov. 13, 2009.
First Communication from European patent application No. 06803540.1, dated Jun. 30, 2008.
First Examination Report for Indian patent application No. 4676/CHENP/2006 dated Apr. 17, 2009.
First Office Action (Notification of Reasons for Rejection) dated Jan. 28, 2014 in related Japanese Patent Application No. 2013-524161. 5 pgs. including English Translation.
First Office Action for Chinese application No. 200780018710.5 dated May 12, 2010.
First Office Action from Australian patent application No. 2005248759, dated Apr. 30, 2009.
First Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 2005800142124 dated Mar. 14, 2008.
First Office Action from Chinese patent application No. 200980122613.X, dated Aug. 15, 2012.
First Office Action from Japanese patent application No. 2011514603, dated Jul. 10, 2012.
First Office Action from Japanese patent application No. 2011514603, dated Jul. 10, 212.
First Office Action from Russian patent application No. 2006145434 dated Oct. 5, 2007.
First Office Action from the corresponding Chinese patent application No. 200980122611.0 dated Nov. 23, 2011.
First Office Action from the related Japanese patent application No. 2012-527988, dated May 14, 2013.
First Official Action from Russian patent application 2008116682, dated Jan. 16, 2009.
First Official Action from Russian patent application No. 2006134646, dated Mar. 12, 2008.
First Official Action from Russian patent application No. 2008103014, dated Jun. 9, 2009.
First Rejection Notice issued for Japanese patent application No. 2007-527282 dated Dec. 14, 2009.
Fourth Office Action from Chinese patent application No. 200580014212.4 issued on Jul. 24, 2009.
Fourth Official Action for Russian patent application No. 2008116682, dated Dec. 18, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion for patent application No. PCT/US2009/003621, dated Sep. 30, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/US2006/035728, dated Jan. 12, 2007.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/US2009/003611, dated Nov. 4, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/US2009/003616, dated Jan. 13, 2010.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/US2009/003619, dated Sep. 30, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Application No. PCT/US2009/003636, dated Oct. 6, 2009.
International Search Report and Written Opinion in Appln No. PCT/US2005/021757 dated Feb. 13, 2006.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of Application No. PCT/US2005/015848 dated Aug. 10, 2005.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of Application No. PCT/US2010/047744 dated Dec. 10, 2010.
International Search Report and Written Opinion of Application No. PCT/US2012/061281, dated Jan. 22, 2013.
International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/US 03/27561, filed Mar. 9, 2003, dated Jun. 15, 2004.
International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/047026, dated Jul. 11, 2011, 4 pgs.
Invitation to Response to Written Opinion for Singapore application No. 201009093-4 dated Nov. 5, 2012.
Japanese Office Action from JP 2011-514605, dated Jun. 19, 2012.
Minutes in accordance with Rule 124(4) EPC for European application No. 05746241.8 dated Nov. 4, 2010.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion for International application No. PCT/US2009/062152 dated Jun. 2, 2010.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion for the international patent application No. PCT/US2010/047444 dated Dec. 10, 2010.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion for the international patent application No. PCT/US2010/047463 dated Dec. 1, 2010.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2006/025206 dated Nov. 10, 2006.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration-PCT/US03/10403 dated Aug. 13, 2003.
Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report or the Declaration—PCT/US03/10403 dated Aug. 13, 2003.
Notification on Results of Examining the Invention for Patentability from Russian patent application No. 2006145434 dated Aug. 1, 2008.
Office Action from Application No. CN201210042907.5, dated Apr. 1, 2014.
Office Action from Chinese Application No. 200980122835.1, dated Apr. 9, 2014.
Office Action from Chinese patent 200110213726.X dated Nov. 29, 2013.
Office Action from Chinese patent Application No. 200580006438.X transmitted Jul. 9, 2008.
Office Action from Chinese Patent Application No. 200880110323.9, dated Jan. 29, 2012.
Office Action from Chinese patent application No. 200980122835.1 dated Sep. 24, 2013.
Office Action from European Application No. 05746241.8, dated Aug. 29, 2007.
Office Action from European Application No. 05853808.3, dated Nov. 6, 2007.
Office Action from European patent application No. 07837769.4, dated Jul. 14, 2009.
Office Action from related European Application No. EP 09767062.4, dated Jul. 13, 2011, 5pgs.
Office Action from Russian patent application No. 2011101386 dated Apr. 23, 2012, 4 pages.
Office Action from the related Japanese patent application No. 2012527994 dated Jun. 11, 2013.
Office Action from the related Russian patent application No. 2011101364 dated Feb. 8, 2012.
Official Action for Canadian Patent Application No. 2,726,601, dated Apr. 12, 2013, 3 pages.
Official Action for the corresponding Russian patent application No. 2011101386 transmitted Dec. 23, 2011.
Official Action from Canadian patent application No. 2563337 dated Sep. 4, 2012.
Official Action from related Russian patent application No. 2009139488, dated Nov. 15, 2012. 3 pages.
Official Action from Russian patent application No. 2009139488, dated Oct. 8, 2012. 3 pages.
Official Action from the corresponding Canadian patent application No. 2726608 dated Dec. 5, 2012.
Official Action from the related Canadian patent application No. 2726613 dated Jan. 11, 2013.
Official Communication from European patent application No. 05746241.8 dated Nov. 12, 2010.
Official Letter from Mexican patent application No. PA/A/2006/013488 dated Jun. 25, 2009.
Rejection Notice for Japanese patent application No. 2007527282 dated Jul. 22, 2010.
Rejection Notice from JP 2011-514611, dated Aug. 20, 2012, 5 pgs.
Rosemount Reference Manual 00809-0100-4022,Rev AA, Jul. 2002, "Model 4600 Oil & Gas Panel Transmitter," 65 pages.
Search Report and Written Opinion for international patent application No. PCT/US2009/002476, dated Apr. 21, 2009.
Second Examination Report for Indian patent application No. 4676/CHENP/2006 dated Apr. 8, 2010.
Second Office Action for Chinese patent application No. 200680015575.4, dated Sep. 25, 2009.
Second Office Action for Chinese Patent Application No. 200980122835.1, dated Mar. 15, 2013, 20 pages.
Second Office Action from Australian patent application No. 2005248759, dated Aug. 28, 2009.
Second Office Action from Chinese patent Application No. 2005800142124 filed May 5, 2005.
Second Office Action from Chinese patent application No. 200980122611.0 dated Aug. 20, 2012.
Second Office Action from Chinese patent application No. 200980122613.X, dated May 9, 2013.
Second Office Action from Russian patent application No. 2006145434 dated Apr. 2, 2008.
Second Official Action from Russian patent application No. 2008116682, dated Apr. 13, 2009.
Seventh Office Action from Chinese patent application No. 200580014212.4 issued on Jan. 31, 2011.
Sixth Office Action from Chinese application No. 2005800014212.4, dated Aug. 17, 2010.
Summons to attend oral proceedings for the European application No. 05746241.8 dated May 26, 2010.
Third Office Action for Chinese patent application No. 200680015575.4, dated Jun. 2010.
Third Office Action from Chinese patent application No. 200580006438.X, dated Sep. 28, 2009.
Third Office Action from Chinese patent Application No. 200580014212.4, dated Dec. 19, 2008.
Third Official Action for Russian patent application No. 2008116682, dated Sep. 11, 2009.
Transmitter Schematic, Sold Jul. 2002, 5 pages.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/855,128, filed Aug. 12, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 12/870,448, filed Aug. 17, 2010.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/937,396, filed Jun. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 60/937,397, filed Jun. 26, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 61/012,262, filed Dec. 7, 2007.
USA & Metric Thread Standards http://www.carrlane.com/Catalog/index.cfm/29425071F0B221118070C1C513906103E0B05543B0B012009083C3B285357474A2C020609090C0015312A36515F554A5B.
Written Opinion and Search Report from the related Singapore patent application No. 201009226-0 dated Mar. 16, 2012.
Written Opinion for the corresponding Singapore patent application No. 2010092278 dated Feb. 16, 2012.
Written Opinion for the related Singapore patent application No. 2010092245 dated Jan. 6, 2012.
Written Opinion from International Search Report from PCT Application No. PCT/US2011/047026, dated Jul. 11, 2011, 8 pgs.
Written Opinion from Singapore Application No. 201009093-4, dated Feb. 20, 2012.
Written Opinion from Singapore Patent Application No. 201009093-4, dated Feb. 20, 2012.
Zahnd et al., "Piezoelectric Windmill: A Novel Solution to Remote Sensing," Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, v. 44, No. 3, p. L104-L105, 2005.

References: Application No. 200980122613
 application No. 08837236
 Application No. 12787964
 application No. 09767057
 application No. 09767063
 application No. 2006145434
 Application No. 2011
 application No. 2006145434
 application No. 2006145434
 application No. 201009226
 application No. 2010092278
 Application No. 05724190
 Application No. 05724190
 application No. 200580014212
 application No. 06803540
 application No. 4676
 Application No. 2013
 application No. 200780018710
 application No. 2005248759
 Application No. 2005800142124
 application No. 200980122613
 application No. 2011514603
 application No. 2011514603
 application No. 2006145434
 application No. 200980122611
 application No. 2012
 application No. 2006134646
 application No. 2008103014
 application No. 2007
 application No. 200580014212
 application No. 2008116682
 application No. 201009093
 application No. 05746241
 application No. 2006145434
 Application No. 200980122835
 Application No. 200580006438
 Application No. 200880110323
 application No. 200980122835
 Application No. 05746241
 Application No. 05853808
 application No. 07837769
 application No. 2011101386
 application No. 2012527994
 application No. 2011101364
 Application No. 2
 application No. 2011101386
 application No. 2563337
 application No. 2009139488
 application No. 2009139488
 application No. 2726608
 application No. 2726613
 application No. 05746241
 application No. 2007527282
 application No. 4676
 application No. 200680015575
 Application No. 200980122835
 application No. 2005248759
 Application No. 2005800142124
 application No. 200980122611
 application No. 200980122613
 application No. 2006145434
 application No. 2008116682
 application No. 200580014212
 application No. 2005800014212
 application No. 05746241
 application No. 200680015575
 application No. 200580006438
 Application No. 200580014212
 application No. 2008116682
 application No. 201009226
 application No. 2010092278
 application No. 2010092245
 Application No. 201009093
 Application No. 201009093
 v.