Source: http://jme.ojs.galoa.net.br/index.php/jme/article/view/19
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 22:34:51+00:00

Document:
One-third of the stroke survivors remain with some disability, needing assistance to perform the activities of daily life and therapy to recover the lost functions. The robotic rehabilitation is a promissed field in this context improving the effectiveness of the treatment. Many researches have focused on developing human-robot interaction control to ensure user safety and therapy efficiency, but the validation of these controllers often requires contact between humans and robots, which involves cost, time and risk of accidents. This work aims to present a computational model of an ideal active orthosis used to assist the knee movement as a tool for test and validate human-robot interaction controls. Three controllers were applied to make the orthosis move the knee tracking the desired trajectory: a PID controller, an Inverse Dynamics-Based controller, and a Feedback-Feedforward Controller. The model proved to be useful and the controller with the best performance was the Feedback-Feedforward one.
ANDROWIS, G. J.; PIKAR, R.; RAMANUJAM, A.; NOLAN, K. J. Electromyography assessment during gait in a robotic exoskeleton for acute stroke. Frontiers in Neurology, v. 9, p. 630, 2018.
DELP, S. L.; ANDERSON, F. C.; ARNOLD, A. S.; LOAN, P.; HABIB, A.; JOHN, C. T.; GUENDELMAN, E.; THELEN, D. G. Opensim: Open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, v. 54, n. 11, p. 1940–1950, 2007.
DIAZ, I.; GIL, J. J.; SANCHEZ, E. Lower-limb robotic rehabilitation: Literature review and challenges.
Journal of Robotics, v. 2011, 2011.
DURANDAU, G.; SARTORI, M.; BORTOLE, M.; MORENO, J. C.; PONS, J. L.; FARINA, D. Emg-driven models of human-machine interaction in individuals wearing the h2 exoskeleton. IFAC-PapersOnLine, v. 49, p. 200–203, 2016.
HOGAN, N. Impedance control: An approach to manipulation: Part 1-3. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, v. 107, p. 1–24, 1985.
HUANG, V. S.; KRAKAUER, J. W. Robotic neurorehabilitation: a computational motor learning perspective. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, v. 6, n. 1, p. 5, Feb 2009. ISSN 1743-0003. Disponível em: .
IBARRA, J. C. P.; SIQUEIRA, A. A. G. Impedance control of rehabilitation robots for lower limbs, review.
In: 2014 Joint Conference on Robotics: SBR-LARS Robotics Symposium and Robocontrol. [S.l.: s.n.], 2014. p. 235–240.
KHAMAR, M.; EDRISI, M. Designing a backstepping sliding mode controller for an assistant human knee exoskeleton based on nonlinear disturbance observer. Mechatronics, v. 54, p. 121–132, 2018.
KIA, M.; STYLIANOU, A. P.; GUESS, T. M. Evaluation of a musculoskeletal model with prosthetic knee through six experimental gait trials. Medical Engineering & Physics, v. 36, 2014.
LLOYD, D. G.; BESIER, T. F. An emg-driven musculoskeletal model to estimate muscle forces and knee joint moments in vivo. Journal of Biomechanics, v. 36, p. 765–776, 2003.
MJ, K.; ML, H. The effect of knee model on estimates of muscle and joint forces in recumbent pedaling.
ASME. J Biomech Eng., v. 132.
estimation of musculo-tendon, joint contact, ligament and bone forces during gait. Journal of Biomechanics, v. 47, 2014.
NUNES, P. F.; SANTOS, W. M.; NOGUEIRA, S.; SIQUEIRA, A. A. G. Analyzing motor primitives of healthy subjects wearing a lower limb exoskeleton. In: International Congress of Mechanical Engineering – COBEM. [S.l.: s.n.], 2017. v. 1.
CONTROL. 10th IFAC Symposium on Biological and Medical Systems. [S.l.], 2018.
Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (Biorob). [S.l.: s.n.], 2018.
(phdthesis) — Universidade de São Paulo, São Carlos, 2017.
forces in human movement. Journal of Biomechanics, v. 40, p. 326–366, 2007.
SHAO, Q.; BASSETT, D. N.; MANAL, K.; BUCHANAN, T. S. An emg-driven model to estimate muscle forces and joint moments in stroke patients. Computers in Biology and Medicine, v. 39, p. 1083–1088.
computed muscle control. Journal of Biomechanics, v. 36, n. 3, p. 321–328, 2003.
control and surrogate contact modelling. Medical Engineering & Physics, v. 48, p. 196–205, 2017.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.