Source: http://pmd.igdp.org.br/article/doi/10.4322/pmd.2018.011
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 03:03:14+00:00

Document:
Simulation supports are intermediary objects that help in anticipating the behavior of production systems are important in designs that involve Ergonomics Work Analysis (EWA) method and Future Activity Analysis (FAA) approach. The objective is to describe the process of transformation design of a productive situation using three areas of study: Ergonomics, Simulation and Plant Layout Design. The focus is on the application of intermediary objects during the design process. This article involves a reflective practice of a single case study in which the activity-centered ergonomics approach was employed in the design of productive situations. The described case took place at a plastic film roll manufacturing plant. In this work were used the computational techniques and tools for the design of productive situations: Computer Aided Design, Digital Human Modeling and Simulation, Discrete Event Simulation and Game Engine. The use of these intermediary objects potentially reduces the time spent on design, makes better use of investment resources, contributes to an understanding of current and future capacity, and provides ergonomic improvements of the work situation for future users. The integration of different intermediate objects at the perspective of ergonomics, like digital human simulation, discrete event simulation and game engine can contribute to simulate future work in the design process.
ergonomics, workspace design, simulation, intermediary objects.
ANDERSEN, S. N.; BROBERG, O. Participatory ergonomics simulation of hospital work systems: The influence of simulation media on simulation outcome. Applied Ergonomics, v. 51, p. 331-342, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.003. PMid:26154230.
BANKS, J. Handbook of simulation. 1st ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998. 849 p. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470172445.
BANKS, J. et al. Discrete-event system simulation. 5th ed. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall, 2010. 622 p.
BÉGUIN, P. Design as a mutual learning process between users and designers. Interacting with Computers, v. 15, n. 5, p. 709-730, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0953-5438(03)00060-2.
BÉGUIN, P. Taking activity into account during the design process. Activités, v. 4, n. 2, p. 115-121, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/activites.1727.
BÉGUIN, P. Argumentos para uma abordagem dialógica da inovação. Laboreal, v. 4, n. 2, p. 72-82, 2008a. Available from: . Access in: 20 Apr 2018.
BÉGUIN, P. Workers-designers interactions: a developmental approach for an innovative design. In: SNELWAR, L. I.; MASCIA, F. L.; MONTEDO, U. B. (Ed.). Organizational design and management IX. 1st ed. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher, 2008b. p. 585-590.
BITTENCOURT, J. M.; DUARTE, F.; BÉGUIN, P. From the past to the future: Integrating work experience into the design process. Work, v. 57, n. 3, p. 379-387, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/WOR-172567. PMid:28621698.
BRAATZ, D. et al. Digital human modeling and simulation for ergonomics workspace design: two Brazilian cases. In: INTERNATIONAL DIGITAL HUMAN MODELING SYMPOSIUM, 2., 2013, Ann Harbor, Michigan. Proceedings… Michigan: UMTRI, 2013. Available from: . Access in: 20 Apr 2018.
BROBERG, O. Quando o projeto participativo de espaços de trabalho se encontra com o projeto de engenharia em eventos de colaboração mútua. Laboreal, v. 4, n. 2, p. 47-58, 2008. Available from: . Access in: 20 Apr 2018.
BROBERG, O.; ANDERSEN, V.; SEIM, R. Participatory ergonomics in design processes: the role of boundary objects. Applied Ergonomics, v. 42, n. 3, p. 464-472, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2010.09.006. PMid:20947061.
COLOMBO, G.; CUGINI, U. Virtual humans and prototypes to evaluate ergonomics and safety. Journal of Engineering Design, v. 16, n. 2, p. 195-203, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09544820500031542.
DANIELLOU, F. A análise da atividade futura e concepção de instalações externas. In: DUARTE, F. (Ed.). Ergonomia e projeto: na indústria de processo contínuo. 1. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lucerna, 2002, p. 75-83.
DANIELLOU, F. Simulating future work activity is not only a way of improving workstation design. Activités, v. 4, n. 2, p. 84-90, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/activites.1704.
DANIELLOU, F.; RABARDEL, P. Activity-oriented approaches to ergonomics: Some traditions and communities. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, v. 6, n. 5, p. 353-357, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14639220500078351.
FONTES, A. R. M. et al. Complementarities of digital human models and ergonomic work analysis in workstation design: the manual packaging task. International Journal of Human Factors Modelling and Simulation, v. 4, n. 3-4, p. 266-277, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1504/IJHFMS.2014.067185.
FRITZSCHE, L. et al. Interactive production planning and ergonomic assessment with digital human models: introducing the Editor for Manual Work Activities (EMA). Work, v. 41, p. 4428-4432, 2012. PMid:22317401.
GARRIGOU, A. et al. Activity anaysis in participatory design and analysis of participatory design activity. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v. 15, n. 5, p. 311-327, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(94)00079-I.
GUÉRIN, F. et al. Compreender o trabalho para transformálo: a prática da Ergonomia. 1. ed. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher, 2001. 200 p.
JONG, A. M.; VINK, P. Participatory ergonomics applied in installation work. Applied Ergonomics, v. 33, n. 5, p. 439-448, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00033-9. PMid:12236653.
KELTON, W. D.; SADOWSKI, R. P.; STURROCK, D. T. Simulation with Arena. 4th ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Higher Education, 2007. 630 p.
LARING, J. et al. Computer aided workplace design: an approach to create a tool for the production engineer. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v. 17, n. 4, p. 323-330, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-8141(95)00063-1.
LIMA, F.; DUARTE, F. Integrating ergonomics to the engineering design: Ergonomic specifications and usage settings. Gestão & Produção, São Carlos, v. 21, n. 4, p. 679-690, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0104-530X733-13.
SEIM, R.; BROBERG, O. Participatory workspace design: a new approach for ergonomists? International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, v. 40, n. 1, p. 25-33, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2009.08.013.
VINCK, D. De l’objet intermédiaire à l’objet-frontière Vers la prise en compte du travail d’équipement. Revue d’Anthropologie des Connaissances, v. 3, n. 1, p. 51-72, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rac.006.0051.
VINCK, D. Taking intermediary objects and equipping work into account in the study of engineering practices. Engineering Studies, v. 3, n. 1, p. 25-44, 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19378629.2010.547989.
VINK, P.; RHIJN, G.; SEIM, R. Stakeholder involvement in stages of a participatory process illustrated in interior design cases. In: SNELWAR, L. I.; MASCIA, F. L.; MONTEDO, U. B. (Ed.). Organizational design and management IX. 1st ed. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher, 2008. p. 13-18.
WISNER, A. Questões epistemológicas em ergonomia e em análise do trabalho. In: DANIELLOU, F. (Ed.). A ergonomia em busca de seus princípios: debates epistemológicos. São Paulo: Edgard Blücher, 2004. p. 30-53.
WISNER, A. Understanding problem building: ergonomic work analysis. Ergonomics, v. 38, n. 3, p. 595-605, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00140139508925133.
YIN, R. K. Case study research and applications: design and methods. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2009.
ZÜLCH, G. Features and limitations of digital human models: a new German guideline. Work, v. 41, p. 2253-2259, 2012. PMid:22317050.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.