Source: https://iai.asm.org/content/77/5/1723
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 04:39:35+00:00

Document:
Vibrio vulnificus is an opportunistic human pathogen that is highly lethal and is responsible for the overwhelming majority of reported seafood-related deaths in the United States (30, 117). This bacterium is a part of the natural flora of coastal marine environments worldwide and has been isolated from water, sediments, and a variety of seafood, including shrimp, fish, oysters, and clams (4, 7, 25, 26, 43, 97, 109, 116, 118, 149, 165). Consumption of seafood (primarily raw oysters) containing V. vulnificus can result in a severe, fulminant systemic infection. Characteristics of this disease include fever, chills, nausea, hypotensive septic shock, and the formation of secondary lesions on the extremities of patients (11, 22, 41, 74, 115, 146). This primary septicemia is the most lethal infection caused by V. vulnificus, with an average mortality rate exceeding 50% (30, 41). A review of 459 U.S. cases reported by the FDA between 1992 and 2007 (J. D. Oliver, unpublished) revealed that 51.6% of the patients died. Interestingly, 85.6% of the cases were male; this aspect of the infection is discussed later in this review. Of 180 cases in 2002 to 2007 for which FDA data were available, 92.8% of patients had consumed raw oysters prior to the onset of symptoms and 95.3% had some preexisting disease(s). The latter are clearly associated with V. vulnificus infection, with liver diseases, such as cirrhosis or hepatitis, being the most common (116). In addition to septicemia, V. vulnificus can produce serious wound infections that typically result from exposure of open wounds to water harboring the bacterium (114). Wound infections are frequently contracted as a result of recreational swimming, fishing injuries, or seafood handling (7, 46). Like systemic disease, wound infections progress rapidly to cellulitis, ecchymoses, and bullae, which can progress to necrotizing fasciitis at the site of infection; however, the mortality rate for wound infections (ca. 25%) is lower than that for systemic disease (10, 13, 74). This organism possesses a wide array of virulence factors, including acid neutralization, capsular polysaccharide expression, iron acquisition, cytotoxicity, motility, and expression of proteins involved in attachment and adhesion. These factors likely require concerted expression for pathogenesis to take place and appear to be under the control of global regulators. Overall, V. vulnificus is a complex microorganism with physiological characteristics that contribute to its survival in the marine environment and in the human host.
Biotypes.Strains of V. vulnificus are classified into biotypes based on their biochemical characteristics. Strains belonging to biotype 1 are responsible for the majority of human infections, while biotype 2 strains are primarily eel pathogens (2, 153). A recently identified third biotype (biotype 3) was shown to possess biochemical properties of both biotypes 1 and 2 and to cause human wound infection (7). Analyses comparing genomic similarities among the three biotypes indicated that biotype 3 is a hybrid of biotypes 1 and 2 (6). Furthermore, the use of multilocus sequence typing indicated similar results and divided strains of V. vulnificus into genetic lineages (24). This analysis also uncovered the presence of a 33-kb genomic island found only in lineage 1/biotype 1 strains (24). Several genes located within this genomic island are thought to play a role in pathogenesis of other pathogens; therefore, it was suggested that V. vulnificus strains possessing this island also possess an increased potential for virulence (24). While biotype 3 does cause human infections, these have to date been limited to Israel and to persons handling tilapia fish, and biotype 1 is the predominant cause of human infections. Thus, the remainder of this review will focus on the characteristics of biotype 1.
On average, 34 cases of V. vulnificus infection are reported annually by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (115-117). However, in recent years this number has risen dramatically. The CDC reported Vibrio infections increased by 78% between 1996 and 2006, and in 2005, 121 cases of V. vulnificus disease were confirmed (14, 15). While reasons for these increases have yet to be determined, it has been noted that outbreaks of V. vulnificus disease in Israel are associated with record high temperatures (124). These data suggest that global climate change resulting in higher water temperatures may increase the frequency of V. vulnificus disease and influence the global distribution of this pathogen (124). Despite increases in the number of cases, the rate of infection remains relatively low. This contrasts with the ubiquity of this organism in marine habitats. At least part of the explanation for this difference is that V. vulnificus rarely causes severe disease in healthy individuals. However, persons with underlying disorders, such as chronic liver disease, diabetes, hemachromatosis, AIDS, malignancy, and immunocompromised states, are at high risk of infection (74, 115, 116). In fact, individuals with compromised immune systems or chronic liver disease are up to 80 times more likely than healthy individuals to develop primary septicemia (13). However, in that such underlying conditions put between 12 million and 30 million Americans at risk for infection, the opportunistic nature of this pathogen alone cannot solely account for its low rate of infection (117).
Genotypes.The discrepancy between the large at-risk population and the low level of disease has spawned a flurry of studies investigating methods for subtyping V. vulnificus in hopes of identifying genetic indicators of virulence. One such method employed random amplified polymorphic DNA PCR to identify an amplicon present primarily in clinical isolates (156). Subsequent analysis of this virulence-correlated gene (vcg) revealed consistent sequence variations that correlate highly with the isolation source (131). Strains possessing the sequence common among clinical isolates were designated C type, while strains possessing the environmentally correlated sequence were designated E type. Clinical and environmental strains can also be differentiated by comparing 16S rRNA sequences, where the majority of environmental isolates possess the “A type” and clinical isolates generally have the “B type” (3, 67, 111). More recently, typing of the intergenic spacer region between 16S and 23S rRNA genes has further subdivided V. vulnificus based on PCR banding patterns. This analysis showed clinical strains were highly similar, grouping into one cluster that contained only B-type strains (32). Conversely, environmental isolates displayed much more variability, and though they grouped into a single cluster, the strains comprised a mixture of both A and B 16S rRNA. While 16S rRNA has been widely used for evaluating V. vulnificus strains, recent questions have been raised as to the effectiveness of this typing system since this RNA species appears to be highly polymorphic (113).
Typing methods have been employed to examine the environmental distribution of potentially virulent strains of V. vulnificus. We examined the presence of the C and E genotypes in oysters and surrounding seawater and found that while these genotypes were present in approximately equal proportions in water (46.9% E type versus 53.1% C type), there was a large preponderance (84.4%) of the potentially less virulent E types in oysters (155). Evaluation of market oysters using the A/B typing system reported similar results, with B-type strains comprising a minority among V. vulnificus isolates (78). Such results indicate that in addition to the opportunistic nature of V. vulnificus, the disparity of genotype distribution in oysters may also factor into the low incidence of disease (155). Examination of 75 cases reported by the FDA between 2002 and 2007 revealed that the onset of symptoms occurred within a range of 0 to 7 days (2.0 days average) whether a victim consumed a single oyster or 24 oysters, and symptoms typically occurred within a mean of 24 h (Oliver, unpublished). Similarly, of those consuming a single oyster, 33% died, whereas of those consuming >24 oysters, 25% died. These data indicate that the number of oysters consumed is not a factor either in the length of time before symptom development or in disease outcome, suggesting that the ingestion of a single oyster containing a sufficiently high number of V. vulnificus strains possessing a virulent genotype is likely adequate to initiate disease in predisposed individuals.
The variety of individual loci able to correlate V. vulnificus isolates with the isolation source points to chromosome-wide differences among strains of this bacterium. Thus, a subtyping method that simultaneously examines DNA polymorphisms at multiple loci has been used to further discriminate among V. vulnificus strains. Repetitive extragenic palindromic PCR (rep-PCR) targets conserved repetitive elements that are distributed throughout the bacterial genome, generating a “fingerprint” for each strain. In contrast to the case with intergenic spacer region typing (32), analysis of clinical and environmental isolates using this technique showed higher diversity among clinical isolates, while environmental strains were quite similar (18). rep-PCR analysis was also combined with single-locus typing methods to compare V. vulnificus strains isolated from various sources and worldwide locations. Results from this study found that the clinical profile was rarely seen among oyster isolates, supporting the findings noted above (18, 78, 155). Given the concerns regarding the highly polymorphic nature of rRNA and the congruence between rep-PCR results and those of other, single-locus typing methods (e.g., vcgC or vcgE and capsular polysaccharide (CPS) allele typing), this method of evaluating multiple loci seems to better characterize the genomic divergence of this bacterium. Additionally, these data support epidemiological findings and further link the environmental distribution and pathogenic potential of V. vulnificus to the incidence of disease.
Acid resistance.The rapid onset of symptoms (as little as 7 h after raw oyster consumption ) and progression of infection indicate that V. vulnificus is able to quickly evade the immune response mounted by infected individuals. In order to better understand the pathogenic nature of this bacterium, researchers have investigated how V. vulnificus interacts with various aspects of host defenses. Since disease typically results from raw shellfish consumption, the highly acidic gastric environment is one of the first host defenses encountered by this bacterium. A common method employed by gram-negative bacteria to neutralize low-pH environments is through the breakdown of amino acids to yield amines and CO2, and V. vulnificus appears to use a similar system when it encounters acidic environments in vitro. In this bacterium, lysine decarboxylase, which is encoded by the cadBA operon, breaks down lysine to form cadaverine (127). Expression of this operon, which is primarily regulated by cadC, increases upon acid exposure (126, 127). In addition to its function as an acid neutralizer, cadaverine also acts as a superoxide radical scavenger, suggesting a link between acid and oxidative stress tolerance (54, 65). In V. vulnificus, exposure to low pH results in increased cellular superoxide levels (66), and expression of both cadBA and activity of lysine decarboxlyase are increased upon exposure to superoxide stress (65). Under these conditions, cadBA expression is also regulated by soxR (65). This link between acid and oxidative stress tolerance is further indicated by the use of manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD) for acid neutralization in a variety of bacteria (23, 159, 160). In V. vulnificus, mutation of manganese SOD (encoded by sodA) resulted in an increased sensitivity to low pH (66). However, this gene is not directly induced by low pH but rather is induced by the oxidative stress that results from low pH exposure, suggesting that at acidic pH sodA is indirectly regulated through SoxR (66). Furthermore, mutation of sodA resulted in a 2-log increase in the 50% lethal dose (LD50) after intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection, highlighting its need for bacterial survival within the host (53). Two other superoxide dismutase genes (sodB and sodC) were examined for their role in survival under low-pH conditions, and results showed that a loss of either gene also resulted in increases in the LD50 compared to that of the wild-type strain (53). Overall, these results demonstrate that loss of any SOD activity results in a decrease in virulence and suggest that soxR may serve as a link between acid neutralization and the oxidative stress pathways. The link between these two pathways may be what helps this bacterium survive the acidic environment of the human gut. While the genes discussed above are involved in acid survival, it should be noted that V. vulnificus is a poor survivor when placed directly in low pH under laboratory conditions (75). However, exposure to a slightly acidic pH prior to low-pH exposure dramatically increases survival of this organism, demonstrating the induction of a stress response(s) which provides a protective effect for the subsequent stresses (127). While there are limited data on protection against acid stress in this organism, nutrient starvation has been shown to induce cross-protective effects against oxidative stress (130). Furthermore, cross-protection following starvation has been shown to increase survival of this pathogen under both clinical and environmental conditions (9, 130). These cross-protective abilities are likely an important contributor to the survival of this organism and may work in concert with the mechanisms outlined above to allow its survival as it passes through the gastric environment.
Host immune response.Once V. vulnificus passes through the digestive tract and enters the bloodstream, one of the primary innate immune factors encountered by the bacterium is complement. Research examining the effects of V. vulnificus infection on complement activity demonstrated that blocking the classical complement cascade could eliminate the bactericidal effects of serum (108). Furthermore, opsonization as a result of complement activation was required for phagocytosis of V. vulnificus by polymorphonuclear leukocytes, demonstrating the need for this branch of the innate immune response in clearing V. vulnificus infection (108). While the precise role of polymorphonuclear leukocytes in V. vulnificus disease is not yet understood, these leukocytes are known to secrete cytokines that serve to recruit additional leukoctyes to the site of infection following complement-mediated phagocytosis. Several of these cytokines are also able to induce the inflammatory response, and it has been suggested that septic shock, which is a hallmark of V. vulnificus disease, may result from overactive cytokine induction (137). Analysis of cytokine activation during V. vulnificus disease has shown that several proinflammatory cytokines, namely interleukin 6 (IL-6), IL-8, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), are specifically induced and predominantly expressed during infection (81, 125, 137). These results are also supported by epidemiologic data which found increased levels of several cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1, present in the blood of patients infected with the bacterium (137).
Other studies investigating activation of the innate immune response against V. vulnificus examined the role of Toll-like receptors. These receptors are commonly found on the surfaces of immune and epithelial cells, and some are specifically involved in recognizing antigens produced by gram-negative bacteria (28, 101). Studies examining the activation of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) showed that it does not appear to participate in lymphocyte apoptosis upon exposure to V. vulnificus and is therefore unlikely to participate in the immune response during infection (56). However, TLR2 was shown to be activated by a surface lipoprotein (encoded by ilpA) of V. vulnificus, and its activation resulted in the production of TNF-α and IL-6, which have been established as associated with V. vulnificus infection (33). Examination of innate immune system activation by V. vulnificus surface structures revealed that flagellin, the flagellar structural subunit, was able to bind TLR5 and thus activate immune responses (89). These studies implicate TLR2 and TLR5 in activation of host immune responses to V. vulnificus; however, more research is needed to definitively establish their role in innate immune system activation. Additional investigations into TLR2 and TRL5 revealed that binding of these receptors by V. vulnificus “pathogen-associated molecular patterns” resulted in production of the immune regulatory element NF-κB and in turn led to secretion of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-8, which not only is involved in the inflammatory response but also is a potent activator of neutrophils (33, 81, 89).
Neutrophils are among the first responders to acute infection and readily phagocytize and degrade invading organisms. Blood taken from patients with chronic liver disease showed decreased neutrophil activity compared to the blood of healthy individuals, and survival of V. vulnificus in human blood is inversely correlated with phagocytosis by neutrophils (44). Based on these data and a study showing increased neutrophil concentrations in the peritoneal cavity upon infection with V. vulnificus, the response of neutrophils to V. vulnificus has been implicated as a disease determinant for this organism (44, 56, 144, 154). One of these studies, however, did use unencapsulated strains (the significance of which is discussed later in this review), thus diminishing the potential role neutrophils play in controlling V. vulnificus infection (44, 154). In addition to neutrophils, macrophages have also been suggested to play a part in defense against V. vulnificus. During infection, this bacterium reduces the number of lymphocytes through apoptotic activity, but neutrophil numbers do not decrease, indicating that other leukocytes are being targeted (56). Specific examination of macrophages revealed that clinical strains of V. vulnificus were able to induce macrophage apoptosis (57). Furthermore, in the absence of macrophages, neutrophils alone were not able to clear a V. vulnificus infection in mice (154). Together, these results suggest that the ability to kill leukocytes may be a virulence determinant of this organism, with macrophages playing the primary role in clearing V. vulnificus infection and neutrophils playing a secondary role (57, 154).
CPS.Along with the killing of immune cells, evasion of host defenses is another mechanism used by microorganisms to survive inside a host and cause disease. In V. vulnificus, evasion is achieved primarily through surface expression of CPS. The presence of capsule provides resistance to opsonization by complement and thus avoidance of phagocytosis by macrophages (57, 150, 151, 168). Expression of CPS also confers resistance to the bactericidal effects of serum, and it is hypothesized that CPS masks immunogenic structures that normally would activate these nonspecific host responses (57, 129, 168). Due to these effects, expression of CPS is one of the few known virulence factors of V. vulnificus that is recognized to be absolutely required for pathogenicity. Experiments comparing the virulence of encapsulated versus unencapsulated strains have shown that CPS allowed cells to be cleared from the bloodstream more slowly and to be more invasive in subcutaneous tissue than nonencapsulated cells (168). Encapsulated strains also demonstrated increased lethality over that of unencapsulated strains upon i.p. injection into iron-loaded mice (163). Furthermore, insertional inactivation of a CPS transport gene (V. vulnificus wza) abolished surface expression of capsule, and this CPS-negative mutant showed dramatic increases in the LD50 (4.0 × 105 CFU) over that of the encapsulated parent (<10 CFU), confirming the role of CPS in V. vulnificus virulence (164).
Given the pathogenic benefits of CPS expression, it would seem disadvantageous for this bacterium to exist in a nonencapsulated state. However, V. vulnificus does undergo phase-variable expression of its capsule. This phenomenon is identifiable by reversion between opaque (Op) (encapsulated) and translucent (Tr) (reduced capsulation or nonencapsulated) colony morphologies (17, 40, 166). Switching between these phenotypes occurs at a base level of 10−3 to 10−4 (163, 168). However, increased levels of transition to the Tr state can be observed when Op cells are incubated at 37°C (17, 40). The role of phase-variable capsule expression in the virulence of this pathogen is unknown. However, one study reported that C-type strains switched to the Tr phenotype more slowly than E-type strains, indicating that the ability to undergo phase variation may possibly have evolved to increase environmental survival and not human pathogenicity (40).
The production and expression of capsular polysaccharide in V. vulnificus is dependent upon a variety of genetic loci. Primary among these is the group 1 CPS operon. This operon is comprised of highly conserved transport genes followed by more-variable biosynthetic genes (17). Reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR analysis has demonstrated that downregulation of the V. vulnificus transport gene wzb resulted in an intermediate translucent phenotype which has been shown to possess only small amounts of capsule on the cell surface (17, 132). Additionally, sequence changes in the conserved region have been linked to changes in CPS expression, where site-specific deletion of V. vulnificus wzb resulted in an irreversible shift to the Tr phenotype (17). Multiple genes outside of the group 1 operon have also been shown to be essential for CPS expression (121, 170). Among these are two epimerase genes, wcvA and wbpP, which are likely involved in activating monosaccharides in the early stages of capsule development (121, 143, 148). Several glycosyltransferase enzymes (including wecA) and biosynthetic genes (e.g., rml) have also been identified and shown to be essential for capsule expression (143). Overall, the variety of genes involved in capsule production underscores the complexity and importance of this surface structure for V. vulnificus.
Recently a rugose phenotype, resulting from copious production of extracellular polysaccharide, was identified for V. vulnificus and demonstrated a variety of phenotypic differences from the encapsulated, nonrugose morphotype (35). This phenotype has been observed in the related species Vibrio cholerae and has been associated with human virulence (106). In V. vulnificus, rugose isolates exhibit decreased motility, increased resistance to human serum, and increased biofilm formation. However, it is possible that the increased biofilm formation is due to a loss of motility, since mutations in flagellar genes are known to result in this phenotype (107). Regardless, the role of the rugose phenotype in V. vulnificus pathogenicity is uncertain given that increased resistance to human serum was seen only in Op-rugose and not Tr-rugose isolates (35). The Tr-rugose phenotype was also avirulent in mouse models, suggesting that while the rugose phenotype may aid in environmental survival, it does not likely play a definitive role in human disease (36).
Another feature highly associated with V. vulnificus disease is elevated serum iron levels in infected individuals. Early virulence assays conducted with mice demonstrated that the infectious dose of V. vulnificus was directly correlated with serum iron concentrations (162). Furthermore, injecting mice with iron prior to infection significantly lowered the LD50 and increased the mortality rate to 100% (145, 162). The importance of iron acquisition in V. vulnificus virulence is also seen in the differential survival of the C and E genotypes in human serum. The more-virulent C types are better able to survive than the E types, although the addition of exogenous iron allows both genotypes to survive equally well (9). Precisely how excess serum iron confers an advantage to V. vulnificus is still unclear; however, two theories have been put forth. One study evaluating growth of this bacterium in mice demonstrated that the presence of excess iron dramatically increased the growth rates of clinical strains, suggesting that excess iron enhances growth of this pathogen (144). Other researchers have found that excess iron resulted in decreased neutrophil activity and concluded that excess iron resulted in a compromised immune response (45). These differing conclusions indicate that elevated serum iron levels may play multiple roles in enhancing V. vulnificus infection, but they also highlight the need for further research in this area.
Iron acquisition systems.In human serum, most iron is bound to transferrin, making it unavailable to invading organisms (158). In order to scavenge iron from transferrin and other iron-binding compounds, V. vulnificus has developed multiple systems for iron acquisition (142). The primary system used by this organism involves siderophores, of which V. vulnificus produces two types: a catechol and a hydroxymate (141). The catechol siderophore (vulnibactin) is the chief means by which V. vulnificus acquires iron and is required for growth in iron-limited media (1, 61). Mutational analysis of genes involved in vulnibactin synthesis and transport has demonstrated that this siderophore is also required for scavenging iron from transferrin and holotransferrin (61, 157). The suspected role of vulnibactin in virulence was confirmed through mutation of several vulnibactin-associated genes (vuuA, venB, vvsA, and vvsB), which resulted in diminished virulence compared to wild-type strains (64, 94, 157). However, these mutants still retained a moderate level of virulence, signifying the ability of this bacterium to obtain iron by other means, possibly through the use of the hydroxymate siderophore. This second siderophore type has recently been shown to be involved in V. vulnificus infection, but its role in iron uptake is still unclear (1). Interestingly, V. vulnificus not only can utilize iron from its own hydroxymate but also can bind iron sequestered by exogenous hydroxymate molecules secreted by other microorganisms. The desA gene, which encodes a receptor for deferoxamine, a hydroxymate-type siderophore produced by Streptomyces pilosus, was recently found in V. vulnificus (42, 59). Examination of this gene showed it is expressed only when deferoxamine is present, confirming that V. vulnificus can take up iron independently of vulnibactin (59). In addition, V. vulnificus possesses a gene cluster involved in utilization of aerobactin that is produced by Escherichia coli (152). Similar to the case with deferoxamine, these genes are expressed only when aerobactin is present (152). Apart from siderophore-mediated iron uptake, V. vulnificus utilizes non-transferrin-bound iron through a heme receptor, HupA (92). It has been suggested that non-transferrin-bound iron is required for initiation of V. vulnificus growth; therefore, HupA may be necessary for initial growth once the organism enters the host (60, 92).
Regulation of iron acquisition.The expression of genes involved in iron acquisition is highly regulated in V. vulnificus and occurs primarily through the ferric uptake regulator, Fur. Expression of several genes involved in vulnibactin synthesis (vvsA, vvsB, venB, and vis) and uptake (vuuA) are under the control of Fur, which increases expression of these genes under iron-limiting conditions (1, 61, 64, 157). HupA is also regulated by Fur, as are the iron receptors encoded by tonB and tolC (1, 83, 93). While Fur is a common regulator in many organisms, in V. vulnificus Fur regulation is unique in that this protein likely activates its own expression under iron-depleted conditions (83, 84). Given the importance of iron in the disease process of V. vulnificus, further research into regulation of iron acquisition will be critical to understanding the pathogenesis of this organism.
VvhA.Apart from direct uptake of iron, acquisition of this essential nutrient can also be facilitated through hemolytic factors that serve to release the iron from hemoglobin and provide an additional source of plasma iron (39). In V. vulnificus, an extracellular hemolysin encoded by vvhA contributes to iron release through its hemolytic activity and is also responsible, in part, for the bacterium's cytotoxic activity (161). Injection of the purified toxin into mice causes a variety of pathological effects, implicating its contribution in severe tissue necrosis. Additional symptoms resulting from hemolysin exposure include fluid accumulation, intestinal irregularities, partial paralysis, and lethality (37, 81). Direct examination of the effects of hemolysin on host cells revealed that toxin exposure increased vascular permeability, apoptosis of endothelial cells, induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase activity, increased nitric oxide production, and possibly increased neutrophil recruitment (55, 58, 80). Cell death caused by hemolysin occurs through pore formation in the cellular membrane, and it has been suggested that this activity ultimately leads to the vascular permeability and hypotension characteristic of V. vulnificus disease (62). Despite these various and significant virulence attributes, inactivation of hemolysin through vvhA mutation did not demonstrate a difference in the LD50 from that of the parent strain upon i.p. injection into iron-loaded mice (161). Moreover, mice injected with the mutant displayed tissue damage and necrosis similar to those with the wild type, suggesting that hemolysin is not responsible for the lethality of V. vulnificus and also is not solely responsible for the extensive tissue damage resulting from infection (161).
Because vvhA does not appear to be required for lethality of V. vulnificus and because loss of the toxin does not change the pathological results of i.p. infection, it was questioned whether this cytolysin is actively produced in vivo. To address this concern, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and RT-PCR studies were used to identify the toxin and its mRNA transcripts subsequent to infection. Results showed that the toxin is indeed produced in vivo (37, 88). Further investigation into vvhA expression revealed decreased levels of mRNA during swarming and upon loss of the AI-2 quorum sensing system, suggesting this toxin may play a greater role in environmental survival than in human infection (68).
Other studies investigating hemolysin activity within the host revealed that oligomerization of toxin monomers inhibits toxin activity and this oligomerization can be enhanced by the addition of exogenous cholesterol (20, 58, 122, 139, 140). Conversely, the presence of membrane-bound cholesterol increased toxin binding to the erythrocyte membrane and was shown to be required for activity of the toxin (167, 169). These results suggest that cholesterol possesses a hemolysin receptor and, depending on the state of cholesterol (i.e., bound versus free), allows for either increased or decreased toxin activity. In addition to bound cholesterol, hemolysin monomers can also be stabilized by human serum albumin, thereby delaying oligomerization and its associated toxin inactivation (20). Studies examining the effect of cholesterol on hemolysin led to research into the effects of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol on V. vulnificus lethality in diseased mice. Results showed a decrease in lethality when LDL was administered prior to infection (122). However, lethality between a vvhA mutant and the wild-type strain after LDL exposure resulted in no observed differences (123). These results support previous data, which indicated that vvhA does not play a significant role in virulence in primary septicemia, and they further imply that the protective effect conveyed by LDL is not due to the loss of hemolytic activity (123).
VvpE.Another enzyme suggested to be involved in V. vulnificus virulence is an extracellular protease, designated VvpE, which is nonspecific and has broad substrate specificity. The purified enzyme has been shown to cause tissue necrosis and cutaneous lesions, as well as increased vascular permeability leading to edema, all of which are characteristic of the bullous lesions caused by systemic disease (16, 76, 104). The enhanced vascular permeability caused by VvpE occurs through the generation of bradykinin, a known vasodilator (96, 103). Bradykinin production was also shown to be important for invasion of this bacterium, since bradykinin inhibition reduced dissemination of V. vulnificus from the peritoneal cavity into the bloodstream (98). VvpE further contributes to local tissue damage through the degradation of type IV collagen (a component of the basement membrane) and activation of procaspase-3, an enzyme involved in cellular apoptosis (63, 103). However, production of VvpE by both virulent and avirulent strains of V. vulnificus indicated that this enzyme may not be involved in lethality (79, 105). Mutational analysis of vvpE confirmed this hypothesis, with the mutant not differing in LD50 from the parent strain in either local or systemic infections (50, 134). As a result of these findings, functions of VvpE other than in tissue destruction have been investigated. It was reported that VvpE may contribute to the breakdown of heme-containing proteins, thereby releasing iron for use by siderophores, but further studies demonstrated that this is likely not the case (105, 112, 138). Interestingly, although the metalloprotease is apparently not needed for iron acquisition, the presence of iron is required for efficient transcription of vvpE (147). Overall, studies of the activity and action of VvpE indicate that it is not likely to be a major contributor to the virulence of V. vulnificus.
RtxA1.As noted above, single mutations in vvpE and vvhA did not result in changes in either cytotoxicity or lethality compared to their parent strains (50, 134, 161). More significantly, construction of a vvhA vvpE double mutant resulted in a strain which remained highly cytotoxic (29, 72). These results indicate that V. vulnificus must secrete another toxin responsible for this disease characteristic. Random chromosomal mutagenesis has been conducted by several laboratories to identify additional virulence factors in this bacterium, and such studies have identified a gene (rtxA1) homologous to the rtxA toxin gene of V. cholerae (38, 72, 85). RTX toxins are made of repeated structural subunits which form pores in cellular membranes and are found in a broad range of gram-negative bacteria. The amino acid sequence of V. vulnificus RtxA1 shows high homology to the RtxA sequence of V. cholerae, and organization of the Rtx gene cluster is also similar between the two species (72, 85). Two additional rtxA genes have also been identified and are designated rtxA2 and rtxA3, but mutational analysis of these genes indicated they do not play a role in V. vulnificus cytotoxicity or virulence (51). In order to examine the cytotoxic and lethal effects of RtxA, isogenic mutants have been generated. These mutants showed decreased cellular damage compared to the parent strains and an inability to lyse cells or to disrupt either cell monolayers or tight junctions (72, 85, 95). Other observed cellular changes included rearrangement of cytoskeletal structure, bleb formation, and aggregation of actin resulting in cell rounding, which were all attributed to RtxA1 activity (72). It was concluded that such changes could lead to cellular necrosis and allow V. vulnificus to invade the bloodstream by crossing the intestinal epithelium (72). In support of this, an rtxA mutant demonstrated a significant reduction in spread to the liver, indicating the toxin plays a considerable role in the development of systemic disease (38). Overall, these results suggest an important function for RtxA1 in cell injury and possibly infection.
Investigation of RtxA1 activity revealed that incubation of V. vulnificus with host cells resulted in increased toxin expression, suggesting cell-to-cell contact was required for cytotoxicity (72). This physical contact requirement was further evidenced by the following: (i) a lack of cytotoxicity when V. vulnificus was coincubated with HeLa cells in a system that prevented their contact and (ii) the immediate induction of toxin expression when the bacterium encountered host cells (72, 82). This apparent cell contact requirement led to an investigation into the mechanism of toxin delivery. In V. cholerae, the rtxBDE operon comprises a type I secretion system responsible for secretion of RtxA (8, 31, 135). A similar operon-like structure is found in V. vulnificus, suggesting a similar method of RtxA1 delivery (82, 95). Mutation of rtxE showed the mutant strain was unable to secrete RtxA1, as evidenced by the absence of toxin in culture supernatants (82). Further, the rtxE mutant exhibited a reduction in epithelial cell death and decreased mouse lethality, similar to that observed for an rtxA1 mutant, suggesting the changes in virulence were associated with an inability to secrete RtxA1 (82). The second portion of the Rtx gene cluster is the rtxAC region. In other Vibrio spp., RtxC is needed for activation of RtxA (90, 91). In V. vulnificus, mutation of rtxC results in full cytotoxicity with no differences in lethality from the parent, indicating an alternative function for this gene in RtxA1 expression (51). Although rtxA1 is not regulated by rtxC, another potential regulator, HlyU, has been identified. HlyU has long been implicated in the virulence of V. vulnificus due to the presence of antibodies against this protein in the sera of infected patients (73). It has now been shown that this protein serves to regulate expression of rtxA1 at the transcriptional level by binding to a region upstream of the rtx operon and initiating transcription (95). Furthermore, mutation in hlyU resulted in decreased rtxA1 expression (95).
Given the involvement of RtxA1 in V. vulnificus disease, its role in relationship to vvhA and vvpE was investigated. These studies were facilitated by generation of double and triple mutations in rtxA1, vvpE, and vvhA and examination of their cytotoxicity to HeLa cells. As noted above, a vvpE vvhA double mutant remained highly cytotoxic; however, an rtxA1 vvpE double mutant showed a decrease in cytotoxicity similar to that of the rtxA1 single mutant (72). Interestingly, a vvhA rtxA1 double mutant and a vvpE vvhA rtxA1 triple mutant were both devoid of cytotoxic effects. These results indicated that only mutation in rtxA1 influences cell cytotoxicity (72). Moreover, these studies strongly indicate that RtxA1 plays the primary cytotoxic role in V. vulnificus disease, while the role of VvhA appears to be auxiliary and the role of VvpE is likely negligible (72). Mutation of rtxA1 has also demonstrated this toxin is involved in cell death. These mutations have also shown this toxin plays a significant role in the lethal nature of V. vulnificus. Intragastric or i.p. injection of rtxA1 mutants has resulted in higher LD50s than those of wild-type strains (72, 82). Overall, it seems likely that RtxA1 is the primary toxin involved in both cytotoxicity and virulence of V. vulnificus.
LPS.Like tissue necrosis, endotoxic shock is also characteristic of V. vulnificus disease, and this symptom is thought to be due to the presence of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). In V. vulnificus, LPS is a known pyrogen that elicits a small cytokine response in mice and causes release of TNF-α (100, 125). Direct i.p. injection of LPS into rats and mice resulted in a dramatic drop in mean arterial pressure and rapid death of the animal, implicating its role in symptom development and lethality (100, 123). Injection of N-monomethyl-l-arginine, an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase, was shown to mitigate the effects of LPS, indicating this endotoxin may stimulate the host immune response through nitric oxide synthase activity, which contributes to the pyrogenic nature of this toxin (27). Interestingly, LDL cholesterol and estrogen also appear to mitigate the effects of LPS. Injection of LDL prior to LPS exposure was shown to increase mouse survival and delay death in fatal cases (123). Likewise, estrogen has been implicated in the protection of females against the endotoxic activity of V. vulnificus LPS and is apparently the reason for the disproportionately small number of females developing this infection compared to males (102). So far, no link between LDL, estrogen, and their effects on LPS has been reported, and while these results indicate that LPS plays a role in activation of host responses and host damage, the precise role of this cellular component in virulence of V. vulnificus has not been definitively elucidated.
Pili.It is generally accepted that surface receptors are required for virulence since they are used by bacteria for attachment and invasion of a host. The role of attachment in the pathogenesis of V. vulnificus has been well documented with the finding that cell-cell contact is required for cytotoxicity (72). In fact, early studies investigating the pathogenesis of V. vulnificus found that preventing dissemination of the bacterium resulted in a lack of both localized disease and death of the infected animals (10). Because pili are used by many gram-negative bacteria for adherence to host cells, mutations in pilA, which encodes a pilin structural protein, and pilD, which encodes a prepilin peptidase, were generated in V. vulnificus (119, 120). Both mutants demonstrated a loss of attachment to epithelial cells and a slight increase in LD50 (1 and 2 logs for pilA and pilD, respectively) compared to the parent strains (119, 120). Furthermore, mutation in pilD reduced secretion of cytolysin, protease, and chitinase and was associated with an overall reduction in cytotoxicity (120).
Outer membrane proteins.Recently two additional proteins (OmpU and IlpA) suspected of contributing to adherence in V. vulnificus were identified (33, 34, 52). OmpU is an outer membrane protein able to bind fibronectin, and mutation of this gene resulted in decreased binding and adherence to Hep-2 cells (34). IlpA is a membrane-bound protein able to stimulate the immune response (33). Both mutants also showed reduced cytotoxicity but only a slight increase in the LD50 after i.p. injection into mice (33, 34). These results suggest these proteins may contribute to local damage but are not required for lethality. Interestingly, the loss of adherence in the ompU mutant was concomitant with a loss of cytotoxicity, again supporting the conclusion that cell contact is required for cytotoxicity of V. vulnificus (34).
Flagella.In addition to adhesion, flagellum-based motility is important for a variety of bacterial processes including biofilm formation and pathogenesis. In V. vulnificus, several flagellar genes have been mutated in order to investigate the role of flagella in the bacterium's pathogenesis. A loss of two flagellar structural components (encoded by flgC and flgE) each resulted in significant decreases in motility, cellular adhesion, and cytotoxicity compared to those of the parent strains (70, 86). Injection of flgC and flgE mutants into mice resulted in increased LD50s (3-log increase after intragastric inoculation of flgC and 1 log after i.p. injection of flgE), indicating that the flagellum is necessary for virulence (70, 86). However, the use of a polar mutation and problems with complementation tempered the significance of these studies (70, 86). It has been suggested that decreases in motility, adhesion, and cytotoxicity may play a concerted role in reducing virulence, in that a loss of motility may lead to decreased adhesion and to an inhibition of cytotoxin delivery (70, 86). Overall, studies investigating the role of attachment in V. vulnificus virulence lend support to the hypothesis that host cell contact is required for V. vulnificus toxin secretion and pathogenicity.
Quorum sensing.The experimental evidence presented thus far indicates that V. vulnificus requires coordinated expression of a variety of virulence factors in order for tissue destruction and lethality to occur. Therefore, the bacterium likely employs global regulators to control its pathogenesis. Quorum sensing (QS) through the LuxS/LuxR-type system was one of the first global regulatory mechanisms to be investigated in V. vulnificus, where LuxS is responsible for synthesis of autoinducer 2 and LuxR is the associated transcriptional regulator. Mutational analysis of both luxS and luxR (denoted smcR in V. vulnificus ) has demonstrated that a loss of either gene influenced the virulence of this pathogen by decreasing cytotoxicity and increasing the LD50 (69, 87). luxS was also shown to influence transcription of vvhA and vvpE, leading to increases and decreases of these toxins, respectively; however, their precise role in virulence is still unknown (69). Interestingly, the smcR mutant produced translucent colonies, which are associated with decreased lethality in mice (discussed above) and may partially contribute to the decreases in virulence seen with this strain (87). luxS and smcR mutants have also been evaluated for their ability to influence gene expression of mouse alveolar macrophages, and results indicated that the V. vulnificus QS system could influence gene expression of these macrophages and thus potentially contribute to survival of the bacterium during infection (136). Another signaling molecule suggested to regulate virulence of V. vulnificus is cyclic-di-GMP (c-di-GMP), which is a small molecule involved in signaling pathways and which allows bacteria to sense and adapt to their environmental surroundings (12). This messenger has been shown to play a role in virulence regulation in a variety of bacteria (133); however, in V. vulnificus its role in virulence is still not clear (110). Mutation of a gene purported to be involved in synthesis of c-di-GMP demonstrated that increased levels of intracellular c-di-GMP resulted in the production of an extracellular polysaccharide. However, this polysaccharide was not the CPS associated with virulence, and virulence was shown to be unaffected by changes in c-di-GMP levels (110).
Global virulence regulators.Another global regulator that has been extensively investigated for its role in both virulence and general metabolism is the cAMP-cAMP receptor protein (CRP) system. cAMP is generated through the cleavage of ATP by adenylate cyclase (encoded by cya in V. vulnificus ) and functions by binding the CRP, which then binds DNA to influence gene expression. Several putative virulence factors of V. vulnificus have been shown to be under the regulation of cAMP/CRP, including hemolysin, metalloprotease, and an iron acquisition system (5, 19, 21, 48, 49, 71). Mutation of cya dramatically reduced hemolysin production and cytotoxicity to HeLa cells, and further examination revealed cAMP to be a primary regulator of hemolysin activity, with CRP binding to the vvhA promoter region and activating its transcription (19, 71). This signaling cascade also appears to regulate iron acquisition through vulnibactin activity, since mutation of crp suppressed synthesis of vulnibactin and its receptor protein, leading to a loss of transferrin-bound iron utilization (21). While this system directly regulates several genes, it has also been show to indirectly regulate others, such as vvpE. In this case, CRP works in concert with QS via SmcR and exerts its effects on vvpE transcription through the activity of RpoS (48, 49). The cAMP-CRP system is not only necessary for regulation of individual virulence factors but also contributes to lethality, since a cya mutant showed a 2-log increase in LD50 compared to the wild-type strain (71).
While the cAMP-CRP system appears to be a major regulator of V. vulnificus virulence, another global regulator has also been identified. AphB is a transcriptional regulator that is a member of the LysR family and controls activation of virulence factors in many bacteria, including V. cholerae (77). In V. vulnificus, AphB is involved in a wide variety of functions, including acid tolerance, cytotoxicity, adhesion, motility, and lethality (47, 128). Mutation of aphB results in decreased cell death compared to that of the wild type, and the mutant strain also demonstrated significantly less adhesion to epithelial cells than the parent strain (47). Examination of virulence revealed a 3-log increase in the LD50 of the aphB mutant over that of the wild type when i.p. injected into mice (47). In order to identify virulence genes potentially regulated by AphB, microarray analysis was used to compare gene expression between the wild type and the aphB mutant (47). Results showed that a gene encoding an outer membrane protein (belonging to the OmpC family) and a flagellar gene (flaD) both had reduced expression in the aphB mutant, while hupA, venB, and the gene encoding the Flp pilus assembly protein CpaC all showed increased expression. Interestingly, results also showed that several virulence factors are not regulated by AphB, particularly those involved in cytotoxicity, including vvhA, vvpE, and rtxA1 (47). Overall, it appears that AphB primarily regulates genes involved in nutrient acquisition and metabolism and thus indirectly contributes to virulence by controlling growth and environmental adaptation.
HlyU.As mentioned above, the small regulatory protein HlyU is also a regulator of virulence in V. vulnificus. Antibodies against HlyU have been found in the serum of patients infected by V. vulnificus, which first highlighted the importance of this protein in the virulence of this pathogen (73). Mutation of hlyU resulted in a strain with reduced cytotoxicity and an increased LD50 compared to those of the wild type (73, 95). It was initially supposed that the change in cytotoxicity was due to hlyU regulation of vvhA expression; however, given that vvhA has been clearly shown to not be involved in virulence, hlyU was then suggested to regulate rtxA1 (73, 95). Interestingly, microarray and real-time RT-PCR analysis of this mutant revealed a downregulation of both vvhA and rtxA1 expression, and HlyU was further shown to regulate rtxA1 expression at the transcriptional level by binding upstream of the rtxA1 promoter region (95). This protein likely plays an important role in virulence of V. vulnificus, and knowledge of the way it works in concert with other mechanisms of virulence regulation is likely to be a significant advance in our understanding of virulence regulation in this pathogen.
V. vulnificus is a complex microorganism on many levels, from the disparity between its environmental ubiquity and the low number of infections it causes to the genomic heterogeneity seen among strains of this pathogen. While considerable progress has been made in deciphering the mechanisms responsible for virulence, recent studies indicate this bacterium, like most pathogens, requires a coordinated regulation of virulence factor expression in order for pathogenesis to occur. Furthermore, it appears many putative virulence factors (e.g., CPS, hemolysin, extracellular polysaccharide, etc.) serve primarily in environmental survival and pathogenesis in an auxiliary, but beneficial, function. Therefore, knowledge of what factors make this bacterium successful within its natural habitat may lead to a better understanding of the virulence of this significant human pathogen.
This effort was supported in part by grants from NOAA (2006-0950-08) and the USDA (2007-35201-18381).
↵▿ Published ahead of print on 2 March 2009.
Alice, A. F., H. Naka, and J. H. Crosa. 2008. Global gene expression as a function of the iron status of the bacterial cell: influence of differentially expressed genes in the virulence of the human pathogen Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 76:4019-4037.
Aznar, R., W. Ludwig, R. I. Amann, and K. H. Schleifer. 1994. Sequence determination of rRNA genes of pathogenic Vibrio species and whole cell identification of Vibrio vulnificus with rRNA targeted oligonucleotide. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 44:330-337.
Baffone, W., R. Tarsi, L. Pane, R. Campana, B. Repetto, G. L. Mariottini, and C. Pruzzo. 2006. Detection of free-living and plankton-bound vibrios in coastal waters of the Adriatic Sea (Italy) and study of their pathogenicity associated properties. Environ. Microbiol. 8:1299-1305.
Bang, Y. B., S. E. Lee, J. H. Rhee, and S. H. Choi. 1999. Evidence that expression of the Vibrio vulnificus hemolysin gene is dependent on cyclic AMP and cyclic AMP receptor protein. J. Bacteriol. 181:7639-7642.
Bisharat, N., D. I. Cohen, R. M. Harding, D. Falush, D. W. Crook, T. Peto, and M. C. Maiden. 2005. Hybrid Vibrio vulnificus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11:30-35.
Bisharat, N., V. Agmon, R. Finkelstein, R. Raz, G. Ben-Dror, L. Lemer, S. Soboh, R. Colodner, D. N. Cameron, D. L. Wykstra, D. L. Swerdlow, and J. J. Farmer III. 1999. Clinical, epidemiological, and microbiological features of Vibrio vulnificus biogroup 3 causing outbreaks of wound infection and bacteraemia in Israel. Lancet 354:1421-1424.
Boardman, B. K., and K. J. Satchell. 2004. Vibrio cholerae strains with mutations in an atypical type I secretion system accumulate RTX toxin intracellularly. J. Bacteriol. 186:8137-8143.
Bogard, R. W., and J. D. Oliver. 2007. Role of iron in human serum resistance of the clinical and environmental Vibrio vulnificus genotypes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:7501-7505.
Bowdre, J. H., M. D. Poole, and J. D. Oliver. 1981. Edema and hemoconcentration in mice experimentally infected with Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 32:1193-1199.
Bowdre, J. H., J. H. Hull, and D. M. Cocchetto. 1983. Antibiotic efficacy against Vibrio vulnificus in the mouse: superiority of tetracycline. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 22:595-598.
Camilli, A., and B. L. Bassler. 2006. Bacterial small-molecule signaling pathways. Science 24:1113-1116.
CDC. 1993. Vibrio vulnificus infections associated with raw oyster consumption. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 42:405-407.
CDC. 2006. Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food—10 states, United States, 2005. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 55:392-395.
CDC. 2007. Preliminary FoodNet data on the incidence of infection with pathogens transmitted commonly through food—10 states, United States, 2006. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 56:336-339.
Chang, A. K., H. Y. Kim, J. E. Park, P. Acharya, I. S. Park, S. M. Yoon, H. J. You, K. S. Hahm, J. K. Park, and J. S. Lee. 2005. Vibrio vulnificus secretes a broad-specificity metalloprotease capable of interfering with blood homeostasis through prothrombin activation and fibrinolysis. J. Bacteriol. 187:6909-6916.
Chatzidaki-Livanis, M., M. K. Jones, and A. C. Wright. 2006. Genetic variation in the Vibrio vulnificus group 1 capsular polysaccharide operon. J. Bacteriol. 188:1987-1998.
Chatzidaki-Livanis, M., M. A. Hubbard, K. Gordon, V. J. Harwood, and A. C. Wright. 2006. Genetic distinctions among clinical and environmental strains of Vibrio vulnificus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:6136-6141.
Choi, H. K., N. Y. Park, D. I. Kim, H. J. Chung, S. Ryu, and S. H. Choi. 2002. Promoter analysis and regulatory characteristics of vvhBA encoding cytolytic hemolysin of Vibrio vulnificus. J. Biol. Chem. 277:47292-47299.
Choi, M. H., H. Y. Sun, R. Y. Park, Y. H. Bai, Y. Y. Chung, C. M. Kim, and S. H. Shin. 2006. Human serum albumin enhances the hemolytic activity of Vibrio vulnificus. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 29:180-182.
Choi, M. H., H. Y. Sun, R. Y. Park, C. M. Kim, Y. H. Bai, Y. R. Kim, J. H. Rhee, and S. H. Shin. 2006. Effect of the crp mutation on the utilization of transferrin-bound iron by Vibrio vulnificus. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 257:285-292.
Chuang, Y. C., C. Y. Yuan, C. Y. Liu, C. K. Lan, and A. H. Huang. 1992. Vibrio vulnificus infection in Taiwan: report of 28 cases and review of clinical manifestations and treatment. Clin. Infect. Dis. 15:271-276.
Clements, M. O., S. P. Watson, and S. J. Foster. 1999. Characterization of the major superoxide dismutase of Staphylococcus aureus and its role in starvation survival, stress resistance, and pathogenicity. J. Bacteriol. 181:3898-3903.
Cohen, A. L., J. D. Oliver, A. DePaola, E. J. Feil, and E. F. Boyd. 2007. Emergence of a virulent clade of Vibrio vulnificus and correlation with the presence of a 33-kilobase genomic island. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73:5553-5565.
DePaola, A., G. M. Capers, and D. Alexander. 1994. Densities of Vibrio vulnificus in the intestines of fish from the U.S. Gulf Coast. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 60:984-988.
do Nascimento, S. M., R. H. dos Fernandes Vieira, G. N. Theophilo, D. Dos Prazeres Rodrigues, and G. H. Vieira. 2001. Vibrio vulnificus as a health hazard for shrimp consumers. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 43:263-266.
Elmore, S. P., J. A. Watts, L. M. Simpson, and J. D. Oliver. 1992. Reversal of hypotension induced by Vibrio vulnificus lipopolysaccharide in the rat by inhibition of nitric oxide synthase. Microb. Pathog. 13:391-397.
Erridge, C., A. Pridmore, A. Eley, J. Stewart, and I. R. Poxton. 2004. Lipopolysaccharides of Bacteroides fragilis, Chlamydia trachomatis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa signal via toll-like receptor 2. J. Med. Microbiol. 53:735-740.
Fan, J. J., C. P. Shao, Y. C. Ho, C. K. Yu., and L. I. Hor. 2001. Isolation and characterization of a Vibrio vulnificus mutant deficient in both extracellular metalloprotease and cytolysin. Infect. Immun. 69:5943-5948.
Feldhusen, F. 2000. The role of seafood in bacterial foodbourne diseases. Microbes Infect. 2:1651-1660.
Fullner, K. J., and J. J. Mekalanos. 2000. In vivo covalent cross-linking of cellular actin by the Vibrio cholerae RTX toxin. EMBO J. 19:5315-5323.
González-Escalona, N., L. A. Jaykus, and A. DePaola. 2007. Typing of Vibrio vulnificus strains by variability in their 16S-23S rRNA intergenic spacer regions. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 4:327-337.
Goo, S. Y., Y. S. Ham, W. H. Kim, K. H. Lee, and S. J. Park. 2007. Vibrio vulnificus IlpA-induced cytokine production is mediated by Toll-like receptor 2. J. Biol. Chem. 282:27647-27658.
Goo, S. Y., H. J. Lee, W. H. Kim, K. L. Han, D. K. Park, H. J. Lee, S. M. Kim, K. S. Kim, K. H. Lee, and S. J. Park. 2006. Identification of OmpU of Vibrio vulnificus as a fibronectin-binding protein and its role in bacterial pathogenesis. Infect. Immun. 74:5586-5594.
Grau, B. L., M. C. Henk, and G. S. Pettis. 2005. High-frequency phase variation of Vibrio vulnificus 1003: isolation and characterization of a rugose phenotypic variant. J. Bacteriol. 187:2519-2525.
Grau, B. L., M. C. Henk, K. L. Garrison, B. J. Olivier, R. M. Schulz, K. L. O'Reilly, and G. S. Pettis. 2008. Further characterization of Vibrio vulnificus rugose variants and identification of a capsular and rugose exopolysaccharide gene cluster. Infect. Immun. 76:1485-1497.
Gray, L. D., and A. S. Kreger. 1987. Mouse skin damage caused by cytolysin from Vibrio vulnificus and by V. vulnificus infection. J. Infect. Dis. 155:236-241.
Gulig, P. A., K. L. Bourdage, and A. M. Starks. 2005. Molecular pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus. J. Microbiol. 43:118-131.
Helms, S. D., J. D. Oliver, and J. C. Travis. 1984. Role of heme compounds and haptoglobin in Vibrio vulnificus pathogenicity. Infect. Immun. 45:345-349.
Hilton, T., T. Rosche, B. Froelich, B. Smith, and J. Oliver. 2006. Capsular polysaccharide phase variation in Vibrio vulnificus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:6986-6993.
Hlady, W. G., and K. C. Klontz. 1996. The epidemiology of Vibrio infections in Florida, 1981-1993. J. Infect. Dis. 173:1176-1183.
Hoffbrand, A. V., F. Al-Refaie, B. Davis, N. Siritanakatkul, B. F. Jackson, J. Cochrane, E. Prescott, and B. Wonke. 1998. Long-term trial of deferiprone in 51 transfusion-dependent iron overloaded patients. Blood 91:295-300.
Høi, L., J. L. Larsen, I. Dalsgaard, and A. Dalsgaard. 1998. Occurrence of Vibrio vulnificus biotypes in Danish marine environments. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64:7-13.
Hor, L. I., T. T. Chang, and S. T. Wang. 1999. Survival of Vibrio vulnificus in whole blood from patients with chronic liver diseases: association with phagocytosis by neutrophils and serum ferritin levels. J. Infect. Dis. 179:275-278.
Hor, L. I., Y. K. Chang, C. C. Chang, H. Y. Lei, and J. T. Ou. 2000. Mechanism of high susceptibility of iron-overloaded mouse to Vibrio vulnificus infection. Microbiol. Immunol. 44:871-878.
Howard, R., B. Brennaman, and S. Lieb. 1986. Soft tissue infections in Florida due to marine Vibrio bacteria. J. Fla. Med. Assoc. 73:29-34.
Jeong, H. G., and S. H. Choi. 2008. Evidence that AphB, essential for the virulence of Vibrio vulnificus, is a global regulator. J. Bacteriol. 190:3768-3773.
Jeong, H. S., M. H. Lee, K. H. Lee, S. J. Park, and S. H. Choi. 2003. SmcR and cyclic AMP receptor protein coactivate Vibrio vulnificus vvpE encoding elastase through the RpoS-dependent promoter in a synergistic manner. J. Biol. Chem. 278:45072-45081.
Jeong, K. C., H. S. Jeong, J. H. Rhee, S. E. Lee, S. S. Chung, A. M. Starks, G. M. Escudero, P. A. Gulig, and S. H. Choi. 2000. Construction and phenotypic evaluation of a Vibrio vulnificus vvpE mutant for elastolytic protease. Infect. Immun. 68:5096-5106.
Joseph, J. L., and P. A. Gulig. 2007. Analysis of the three RTX loci in pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus, abstr. B-035. Abstr. 107th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
Jung, C. R., M. J. Park, and M. S. Heo. 2005. Immunization with major outer membrane protein of Vibrio vulnificus elicits protective antibodies in a murine model. J. Microbiol. 43:437-442.
Kang, I. H., J. S. Kim, and J. K. Lee. 2007. The virulence of Vibrio vulnificus is affected by the cellular level of superoxide dismutase activity. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17:1399-1402.
Kang, I. H., J. S. Kim, E. J. Kim, and J. K. Lee. 2007. Cadaverine protects Vibrio vulnificus from superoxide stress. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17:176-179.
Kang, M. K., E. C. Jhee, B. S. Koo, J. Y. Yang, B. H. Park, J. S. Kim, H. W. Rho, H. R. Kim, and J. W. Park. 2002. Induction of nitric oxide synthase expression by Vibrio vulnificus cytolysin. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 290:1090-1095.
Kashimoto, T., S. Ueno, H. Hayashi, M. Hanajima, K. Yoshioka, K. Yoshida, K. Mutoh, and N. Susa. 2005. Depletion of lymphocytes, but not neutrophils, via apoptosis in a murine model of Vibrio vulnificus infection. J. Med. Microbiol. 54:15-22.
Kashimoto, T., S. Ueno, M. Hanajima, H. Hayashi, Y. Akeda, S. Miyoshi, T. Hongo, T. Honda, and N. Susa. 2003. Vibrio vulnificus induces macrophage apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Infect. Immun. 71:533-535.
Kim, B. S., and J. S. Kim. 2002. Cholesterol induces oligomerization of Vibrio vulnificus cytolysin specifically. Exp. Mol. Med. 34:239-242.
Kim, C. M., Y. J. Park, and S. H. Shin. 2007. A widespread deferoxamine-mediated iron-uptake system in Vibrio vulnificus. J. Infect. Dis. 196:1537-1545.
Kim, C. M., R. Y. Park, M. H. Choi, H. Y Sun, and S. H. Shin. 2007. Ferrophilic characteristics of Vibrio vulnificus and potential usefulness of iron chelation therapy. J. Infect. Dis. 195:90-98.
Kim, C. M., R. Y. Park, J. H. Park, H. Y. Sun, Y. H. Bai, P. Y. Ryu, S. Y. Kim, J. H. Rhee, and S. H. Shin. 2006. Vibrio vulnificus vulnibactin but not metalloprotease VvpE is essentially required for iron-uptake from human holotransferrin. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 29:911-918.
Kim, H. R., H. W. Rho, M. H. Jeong, J. W. Park, J. S. Kim, B. H. Park, U. H. Kim, and S. D. Park. 1993. Hemolytic mechanism of cytolysin produced from Vibrio vulnificus. Life Sci. 53:571-577.
Kim, H. Y., A. K. Chang, J. E. Park, I. S. Park, S. M. Yoon, and J. S. Lee. 2007. Procaspase-3 activation by a metalloprotease secreted from Vibrio vulnificus. Int. J. Mol. Med. 20:591-595.
Kim, I. H., J. I. Shim, K. E. Lee, W. Hwang, I. J. Kim, S. H. Choi, and K. S. Kim. 2008. Nonribosomal peptide synthetase is responsible for the biosynthesis of siderophore in Vibrio vulnificus MO6-24/O. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 18:35-42.
Kim, J. S., S. H. Choi, and J. K. Lee. 2006. Lysine decarboxylase expression by Vibrio vulnificus is induced by SoxR in response to superoxide stress. J. Bacteriol. 188:8586-8592.
Kim, J. S., M. H. Sung, D. H. Kho, and J. K. Lee. 2005. Induction of manganese-containing superoxide dismutase is required for acid tolerance in Vibrio vulnificus. J. Bacteriol. 187:5984-5995.
Kim, M. S., and H. D. Jeong. 2001. Development of 16S rRNA targeted PCR methods for the detection and differentiation of Vibrio vulnificus in marine environments. Aquaculture 193:199-211.
Kim, M. Y., R. Y. Park, M. H. Choi, H. Y. Sun, C. M. Kim, S. Y. Kim, J. H. Rhee, and S. H. Shin. 2006. Swarming differentiation of Vibrio vulnificus downregulates the expression of the vvhBA hemolysin gene via the LuxS quorum sensing system. J. Microbiol. 44:226-232.
Kim, Y. R., and J. H. Rhee. 2003. Flagellar basal body flg operon as a virulence determinant of Vibrio vulnificus. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 304:405-410.
Kim, Y. R., S. Y. Kim, C. M. Kim, S. E. Lee, and J. H. Rhee. 2005. Essential role of an adenylate cyclase in regulating Vibrio vulnificus virulence. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 243:497-503.
Kim, Y. R., S. E. Lee, H. Kook, J. A. Yeom, H. S. Na, S. Y. Kim, S. S. Chung, H. E. Choy, and J. H. Rhee. 2008. Vibrio vulnificus RTX toxin kills host cells only after contact of the bacteria with host cells. Cell Microbiol. 10:848-862.
Kim, Y. R., S. E. Lee, C. M. Kim, S. Y Kim, E. K. Shin, D. H. Shin, S. S. Chung, H. E. Choy, A. Progulske-Fox, J. D. Hillman, M. Hanfield, and J. H. Rhee. 2003. Characterization and pathogenic significance of Vibrio vulnificus antigens preferentially expressed in septicemic patients. Infect. Immun. 71:5461-5471.
Klontz, K. C., S. Lieb, M. Schreiber, H. T. Janowski, L. M. Baldy, and R. A. Gunn. 1988. Syndromes of Vibrio vulnificus infections. Clinical and epidemiological features in Florida cases, 1981-1987. Ann. Intern. Med. 109:318-323.
Koo, J., A. DePaola, and D. L. Marshall. 2000. Effect of simulated gastric fluid and bile on survival of Vibrio vulnificus and Vibrio vulnificus phage. J. Food Prot. 63:1665-1669.
Kothary, M. H., and A. S. Kreger. 1987. Purification and characterization of an elastolytic protease of Vibrio vulnificus. J. Gen. Microbiol. 13:1783-1791.
Kovacikova, G., and K. Skorupski. 1999. A Vibrio cholerae LysR homolog, AphB, cooperates with AphA at the tcpPH promoter to activate expression of the ToxR virulence cascade. J. Bacteriol. 181:4250-4256.
Krantz, J. A., J. L. Nordstrom, J. C. Bowers, and A. DePaola. 2008. An evaluation of CPC+, a new medium for isolation and enumeration of Vibrio vulnificus from U.S. market oysters, abstr. P-121. Abstr. 108th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
Kreger, A., and D. Lockwood. 1981. Detection of extracellular toxin(s) produced by Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 33:583-590.
Kwon, K. B., J. Y. Yang, D. G. Ryu, H. W. Rho, J. S. Kim, J. W. Park, H. R. Kim, and B. H. Park. 2001. Vibrio vulnificus cytolysin induces superoxide anion-initiated apoptotic signaling pathway in human ECV304 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:47518-47523.
Lee, B. C., S. H. Kim, S. H. Choi, and T. S. Kim. 2005. Induction of interleukin-8 production via nuclear factor-kappaB activation in human intestinal epithelial cells with Vibrio vulnificus. Immunology 115:506-515.
Lee, B. C., J. H. Lee, M. W. Kim, B. S. Kim, M. H. Oh, K. S. Kim, T. S. Kim, and S. H. Choi. 2008. Vibrio vulnificus rtxE is important for virulence and its expression is induced by exposure to host cells. Infect. Immun. 76:1509-1517.
Lee, H. J., S. H. Bang, K. H. Lee, and S. J. Park. 2007. Positive regulation of fur gene expression via direct interaction of Fur in a pathogenic bacterium, Vibrio vulnificus. J. Bacteriol. 189:2629-2636.
Lee, H. J., K. J. Park, A. Y. Lee, S. G. Park, B. C. Park, K. H. Lee, and S. J. Park. 2003. Regulation of fur expression by RpoS and Fur in Vibrio vulnificus. J. Bacteriol. 185:5891-5896.
Lee, J. H., M. W. Kim, B. S. Kim, B. C Lee, T. S. Kim, and S. H. Choi. 2007. Identification and characterization of the Vibrio vulnificus rtxA essential for cytotoxicity in vitro and virulence in mice. J. Microbiol. 45:146-152.
Lee, J. H., J. B. Rho, K. J. Park, C. B. Kim, Y. S. Han, S. H. Choi, K. H. Lee, and S. J. Park. 2004. Role of flagellum and motility in pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 72:4905-4910.
Lee, J. H., J. E. Rhee, U. Park, H. M. Ju, B. C. Lee, T. S. Kim, H. S. Jeong, and S. H. Choi. 2007. Identification and functional analysis of Vibrio vulnificus SmcR, a novel global regulator. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 17:325-334.
Lee, S. E., P. Y. Ryu, S. Y. Kim, Y. R. Kim, J. T. Koh, O. J. Kim, S. S. Chung, H. E. Choy, and J. H. Rhee. 2004. Production of Vibrio vulnificus hemolysin in vivo and its pathogenic significance. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 324:86-91.
Lee, S. E., S. Y. Kim, B. C. Jeong, Y. R. Kim, S. J. Bae, O. S. Ahn, J. J. Lee, H. C. Song, J. M. Kim, H. E. Choy, S. S. Chung, M. N. Kweon, and J. H. Rhee. 2006. A bacterial flagellin, Vibrio vulnificus FlaB, has a strong mucosal adjuvant activity to induce protective immunity. Infect. Immun. 74:694-702.
Li, L., J. L. Rock, and D. R. Nelson. 2008. Identification and characterization of a repeat-in-toxin gene cluster in Vibrio anguillarum. Infect. Immun. 76:2620-2632.
Lin, W., K. J. Fullner, R. Clayton, J. A. Sexton, M. B. Rogers, K. E. Calia, S. B. Calderwood, C. Fraser, and J. J. Mekalanos. 1999. Identification of a Vibrio cholerae RTX toxin gene cluster that is tightly linked to the cholera toxin prophage. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96:1071-1076.
Litwin, C. M., and B. L. Byrne. 1998. Cloning and characterization of an outer membrane protein of Vibrio vulnificus required for heme utilization: regulation of expression and determination of the gene sequence. Infect. Immun. 66:3134-3141.
Litwin, C. M., and J. Quackenbush. 2001. Characterization of a Vibrio vulnificus LysR homologue, HupR, which regulates expression of the haem uptake outer membrane protein, HupA. Microb. Pathog. 31:295-307.
Litwin, C. M., T. W. Rayback, and J. Skinner. 1996. Role of catechol siderophore synthesis in Vibrio vulnificus virulence. Infect. Immun. 64:2834-2838.
Liu, M., A. F. Alice, H. Naka, and J. H. Crosa. 2007. The HlyU protein is a positive regulator of rtxA1, a gene responsible for cytotoxicity and virulence in the human pathogen Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 75:3282-3289.
Maeda, H., and T. Yamamoto. 1996. Pathogenic mechanisms induced by microbial proteases in microbial infections. Biol. Chem. Hoppe Seyler 377:217-226.
Mahmud, Z. H., S. B. Neogi, A. Kassu, B. T. Mai Huong, I. K. Jahid, M. S. Islam, and F. Ota. 2008. Occurrence, seasonality and genetic diversity of Vibrio vulnificus in coastal seaweeds and water along the Kii Chanel, Japan. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 64:209-218.
Maruo, K., T. Akaike, T. Ono, and H. Maeda. 1998. Involvement of bradykinin generation in intravascular dissemination of Vibrio vulnificus and prevention of invasion by a bradykinin antagonist. Infect. Immun. 66:866-869.
McDougald, D., S. A. Rice, and S. Kjelleberg. 2000. The marine pathogen Vibrio vulnificus encodes a putative homologue of the Vibrio harveyi regulatory gene, luxR: a genetic and phylogenic comparison. Gene 248:213-221.
McPherson, V. L., J. A. Watts, L. M. Simpson, and J. D. Oliver. 1991. Physiological effects of the lipopolysaccharide on Vibrio vulnificus on mice and rats. Microbios 67:141-149.
Medzhitov, R. 2001. Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 1:135-145.
Merkel, S. M., S. Alexander, J. D. Oliver, and Y. M. Huet-Hudson. 2001. Essential role for estrogen in protection against Vibrio vulnificus-induced endotoxic shock. Infect. Immun. 69:6119-6122.
Miyoshi, N., S. Miyoshi, K. Sugiyama, Y. Suzuki, H. Furuta, and S. Shinoda. 1987. Activation of the plasma kallikrein-kinin system by Vibrio vulnificus protease. Infect. Immun. 55:1936-1939.
Miyoshi, S., and S. Shinoda. 1988. Role of the protease in the permeability enhancement by Vibrio vulnificus. Microbiol. Immunol. 32:1025-1032.
Morris, J. G., Jr., A. C. Wright, L. M. Simpson, P. K. Wood, D. E. Johnson, and J. D. Oliver. 1987. Virulence of Vibrio vulnificus: association with utilization of transferrin-bound iron, and lack or correlation with levels of cytotoxin or protease production. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 40:55-60.
Morris, J. G., Jr., M. B. Sztein, E. W. Rice, J. P. Nataro, G. A. Losonsky, P. Panigrahi, C. O. Tacket, and J. A. Johnson. 1996. Vibrio cholerae O1 can assume a chlorine resistant rugose survival form that is virulent for humans. J. Infect. Dis. 174:1364-1368.
Mueller, R. S., D. McDougald, D. Cusumano, N. Sodhi, S. Kjellerberg, F. Azam, and D. H. Bartlett. 2007. Vibrio cholerae strains possess multiple strategies for abiotic and biotic surface colonization. J. Bacteriol. 189:5348-5360.
Musher, D. M., M. V. Hansen, A. Goree, F. Gyorkey, A. J. Chapman, and R. E. Baughn. 1986. Emergence of bactericidal and opsonizing antibody to Vibrio vulnificus following bacterial infection. J. Clin. Microbiol. 23:411-415.
Myatt, D. C., and G. H. Davis. 1989. Isolation of medically significant Vibrio species from riverine sources in South East Queensland. Microbios 60:111-123.
Nakhamchik, A., C. Wilde, and D. A. Rowe-Magnus. 2008. Cyclic-di-GMP regulates extracellular polysaccharide production, biofilm formation and rugose colony development by Vibrio vulnificus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:4119-4209.
Nilsson, W. B., R. N. Paranjpye, A. DePaola, and M. S. Strom. 2003. Sequence polymorphism of the 16S rRNA gene of Vibrio vulnificus is a possible indicator of strain virulence. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:442-446.
Okujo, N., T. Akiyama, S. Miyoshi, S. Shinoda, and S. Yamamoto. 1996. Involvement of vulnibactin and exocellular protease in utilization of transferrin- and lactoferrin-bound iron by Vibrio vulnificus. Microbiol. Immunol. 40:595-598.
Olivares-Fuster, O., J. Goris, and C. R. Airas. 2008. 16S rRNA gene polymorphism in Vibrio vulnificus, abstr. Q-054. Abstr. 108th Gen. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC.
Oliver, J. D. 2005. Wound infections caused by Vibrio vulnificus and other marine bacteria. Epidemiol. Infect. 133:383-391.
Oliver, J. D. 2006. Vibrio vulnificus, p. 349-366. In F. L. Thompson, B. Austin, and J. Swing (ed.), The biology of vibrios. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
Oliver, J. D. 2006. Vibrio vulnificus, p. 253-276. In S. Belkin and R. R. Colwell (ed.), Oceans and health: pathogens in the marine environment. Springer Science, New York, NY.
Oliver, J. D., and J. B. Kaper. 2007. Vibrio species, p. 343-379. In M. P. Doyle and L. R. Beuchat (ed.), Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers, 3rd ed. ASM Press, Washington, DC.
O'Neill, K. R., S. H. Jones, and D. J. Grimes. 1992. Seasonal incidence of Vibrio vulnificus in the Great Bay estuary of New Hampshire and Maine. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:3257-3262.
Paranjpye, R. N., and M. S. Strom. 2005. A Vibrio vulnificus type IV pilin contributes to biofilm formation, adherence to epithelial cells, and virulence. Infect. Immun. 73:1411-1422.
Paranjpye, R. N., J. C. Lara, J. C. Pepe, C. M. Pepe, and M. S. Strom. 1998. The type IV leader peptidase/N-methyltransferase of Vibrio vulnificus controls factors required for adherence to HEp-2 cells and virulence in iron-loaded mice. Infect. Immun. 66:5659-5668.
Park, N. Y., J. H. Lee, M. W. Kim, H. G. Jeong, B. C. Lee, T. S. Kim, and S. H. Choi. 2006. Identification of the Vibrio vulnificus wbpP gene and evaluation of its role in virulence. Infect. Immun. 74:721-728.
Park, K. H., H. B. Yang, H. G. Kim, Y. R. Lee, H. Hur, J. S. Kim, B. S. Koo, M. K. Han, J. H. Kim, Y. J. Jeong, and J. S. Kim. 2005. Low density lipoprotein inactivates Vibrio vulnificus cytolysin through the oligomerization of toxin monomer. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 194:137-141.
Park, K. H., J. S. Kim, Y. R. Lee, Y. J. Moon, H. Hur, Y. H. Choi, C. H. Kim, U. H. Kim, E. K. Song, W. H. Yoo, C. S. Lee, B. S. Kim, S. H. Lee, P. Y. Ryu, and M. K. Han. 2007. Low-density lipoprotein protects Vibrio vulnificus-induced lethality through blocking lipopolysaccharide action. Exp. Mol. Med. 39:673-678.
Paz, S., N. Bisharat, E. Paz, O. Kidar, and D. Cohen. 2007. Climate change and the emergence of Vibrio vulnificus disease in Israel. Environ. Res. 103:390-396.
Powell, J. L., A. C. Wright, S. S. Wasserman, D. M. Hone, and J. G. Morris, Jr. 1997. Release of tumor necrosis factor alpha in response to Vibrio vulnificus capsular polysaccharide in in vivo and in vitro models. Infect. Immun. 65:3713-3718.
Rhee, J. E., K. S. Kim, and S. H. Choi. 2005. CadC activates pH-dependent expression of the Vibrio vulnificus cadBA operon at a distance through direct binding to an upstream region. J. Bacteriol. 187:7870-7875.
Rhee, J. E., J. H. Rhee, P. Y. Ryu, and S. H. Choi. 2002. Identification of the cadBA operon from Vibrio vulnificus and its influence on survival to acid stress. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 208:245-251.
Rhee, J. E., H. G. Joeng, J. H. Lee, and S. H. Choi. 2006. AphB influences acid tolerance of Vibrio vulnificus by activating expression of the positive regulator CadC. J. Bacteriol. 188:6490-6497.
Roberts, I. S. 1996. The biochemistry and genetics of capsular polysaccharide production. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 50:285-315.
Rosche, T. M., D. J. Smith, E. E. Parker, and J. D. Oliver. 2005. RpoS involvement and requirement for exogenous nutrient for osmotically induced cross protection in Vibrio vulnificus. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 53:455-462.
Rosche, T. M., Y. Yano, and J. D. Oliver. 2005. A rapid and simple PCR analysis indicates there are two subgroups of Vibrio vulnificus which correlate with clinical and environmental isolation. Microbiol. Immunol. 49:381-389.
Rosche, T. M., B. Smith, and J. D. Oliver. 2006. Evidence for an immediate colony morphology of Vibrio vulnificus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:4356-4359.
Ryan, R. P., Y. Fouhy, J. F. Lucey, and J. M. Dow. 2006. Cyclic Di-GMP signaling in bacteria: recent advances and new puzzles. J. Bacteriol. 188:8327-8334.
Shao, C. P., and L. I. Hor. 2000. Metalloprotease is not essential for Vibrio vulnificus virulence in mice. Infect. Immun. 68:3569-3573.
Sheahan, K. L., C. L. Cordero, and K. J. Satchell. 2004. Identification of a domain within the multifunctional Vibrio cholerae RTX toxin that covalently cross-links actin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101:9798-9803.
Shin, N. R., D. Y. Lee, and H. S. Yoo. 2008. Analysis of gene expression in mouse alveolar macrophages stimulated with quorum-sensing mutants of Vibrio vulnificus. Jpn. J. Infect. Dis. 61:402-406.
Shin, S. H., D. Y. Shin, P. Y. Rhu, S. S. Chung, and J. H. Rhee. 2002. Pro-inflammatory cytokine profile in Vibrio vulnificus septicemic patients' sera. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 33:133-138.
Shin, S. H., H. Y. Sun, R. Y. Park, C. M. Kim, S. Y. Kim, and J. H. Rhee. 2005. Vibrio vulnificus metalloprotease VvpE has no direct effect on the iron-assimilation from human holotransferrin. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 247:221-229.
Shin, S. H., H. Y. Sun, M. H. Choi, R. Y. Park, Y. H. Bai, C. M. Kim, S. Y. Kim, Y. R. Kim, S. E. Lee, and J. H. Rhee. 2005. Inactivation of Vibrio vulnificus hemolysin by oligomerization but not proteolysis. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 28:1294-1297.
Shinoda, S., S. Miyoshi, H. Yamanaka, and N. Miyoshi-Nakahara. 1985. Some properties of Vibrio vulnificus hemolysin. Microbiol. Immunol. 29:583-590.
Simpson, L. M., and J. D. Oliver. 1983. Siderophore production by Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 41:644-649.
Simpson, L. M., and J. D. Oliver. 1987. Ability of Vibrio vulnificus to obtain iron from transferrin and other iron-binding compounds. Curr. Microbiol. 15:155-158.
Starks, A. M., K. L. Bourdage, P. C. Thaiville, and P. A. Gulig. 2006. Use of a marker plasmid to examine differential rates of growth and death between clinical and environmental strains of Vibrio vulnificus in experimentally infected mice. Mol. Microbiol. 61:310-323.
Stelma, G. N., Jr., A. L. Reyes, J. T. Peter, C. H. Johnson, and P. L. Spaulding. 1992. Virulence characteristics of clinical and environmental isolates of Vibrio vulnificus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58:2776-2782.
Strom, M. S., and R. N. Paranjpye. 2000. Epidemiology and pathogenesis of Vibrio vulnificus. Microb. Infect. 2:177-188.
Sun, H. Y., S. I. Han, M. H. Choi, S. J. Kim, C. M. Kim, and S. H. Shin. 2006. Vibrio vulnificus metalloprotease VvpE has no direct effect on iron-uptake from human hemoglobin. J. Microbiol. 44:537-547.
Sutherland, I. W. 1990. Biotechnology of microbial exopolysaccharides, p. 54-59. In J. Baddiley, N. H. Carey, I. J. Higgins, and W. G. Potter (ed.), Cambridge studies in biotechnology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
Tamplin, M. L., G. E. Rodrick, N. J. Blake, and T. Cuba. 1982. The isolation and characterization of Vibrio vulnificus from two Florida estuaries. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 44:1466-1470.
Tamplin, M. L., S. Specter, G. E. Rodrick, and H. Friedman. 1983. Differential complement activation and susceptibility to human serum bactericidal action by Vibrio species. Infect. Immun. 42:1187-1190.
Tamplin, M. L., S. Specter, G. E. Rodrick, and H. Friedman. 1985. Vibrio vulnificus resists phagocytosis in the absence of serum opsonins. Infect. Immun. 49:715-718.
Tanabe, T., A. Naka, H. Aso, H. Nakao, S. Narimatsu, Y. Inoue, T. Ono, and S. Yamamoto. 2005. A novel aerobactin utilization cluster in Vibrio vulnificus with a gene involved in the transcription regulation of the iutA homologue. Microbiol. Immunol. 49:823-834.
Tsuchiya, T., E. Mitsuo, N. Hayashi, Y. Hikita, H. Nakao, S. Yamamoto, K. Miyamoto, and H. Tsujibo. 2007. Vibrio vulnificus damages macrophages during the early phase of infection. Infect. Immun. 75:4592-4596.
Warner, E., and J. D. Oliver. 2008. Population structure of two genotypes of Vibrio vulnificus in oysters (Crassostrea virginica) and seawater. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74:80-85.
Warner, J. M., and J. D. Oliver. 1999. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA analysis of clinical and environmental isolates of Vibrio vulnificus and other Vibrio species. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:1141-1144.
Webster, A. C. D., and C. M. Litwin. 2000. Cloning and characterization of vuuA, a gene encoding the Vibrio vulnificus ferric vulnibactin receptor. Infect. Immun. 68:526-534.
Weinberg, E. D. 1978. Iron and infection. Microbiol. Rev. 42:45-66.
Wilkins, J. C., D. Beighton, and K. A. Homer. 2003. Effect of acidic pH on expression of surface-associated proteins of Streptococcus oralis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69:5290-5296.
Wright, A. C., and J. G. Morris, Jr. 1991. The extracellular cytolysin of Vibrio vulnificus: inactivation and relationship to virulence in mice. Infect. Immun. 59:192-197.
Wright, A. C., L. M. Simpson, J. D. Oliver, and J. G. Morris, Jr. 1990. Phenotypic evaluation of acapsular transposon mutants of Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 58:1769-1773.
Wright, A. C., J. L. Powell, J. B. Kaper, and J. G. Morris, Jr. 2001. Identification of a group 1-like capsular polysaccharide operon in Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 69:6893-6901.
Wright, A. C., R. T. Hill, J. A. Johnson, M. Roghman, R. R. Colwell, and J. G. Morris, Jr. 1996. Distribution of Vibrio vulnificus in the Chesapeake Bay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 62:717-724.
Wright, A. C., J. L. Powell, M. K. Tanner, L. A. Ensor, A. B. Karpas, J. G. Morris, Jr., and M. B. Steinz. 1999. Differential expression of Vibrio vulnificus capsular polysaccharide. Infect. Immun. 67:2250-2257.
Yamanaka, H., T. Satoh, T. Katsu, and S. Shinoda. 1987. Mechanism of haemolysis by Vibrio vulnificus haemolysin. J. Gen. Microbiol. 133:2859-2864.
Yoshida, S., M. Ogawa, and Y. Mizuguchi. 1985. Relation of capsular materials and colony opacity to virulence of Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 47:446-451.
Yu, H. N., Y. R. Lee, K. H. Park, S. Y. Rah, E. M. Noh, E. K. Song, M. K. Han, B. S. Kim, S. H. Lee, and J. S. Kim. 2007. Membrane cholesterol is required for activity of Vibrio vulnificus cytolysin. Arch. Microbiol. 187:467-473.
Zuppardo, A. B., and R. J. Siebeling. 1998. An epimerase gene essential for capsule synthesis in Vibrio vulnificus. Infect. Immun. 66:2601-2606.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 

V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.