Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/091005.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 02:21:41+00:00

Document:
ALLERGEN INC: Botox Manufacturer Sued in C.D. Calif.
FARMERS GROUP: Insurer Sued For Labor Law Violations in Calif.
INTELIUS: Accused of Improper Credit Card Billing in C.D. Calif.
LUNDAN PARTNERS: Tenants Sue Landlord in Cook County, Ill.
IMMERSION CORP: Wolf Haldenstein Files Complaint in N.D. Calif.
UCBH HOLDINGS: Murray Frank Files Shareholder Suit in N.D. Calif.
the drug's label warns against just that, the class claims.
drug have exceeded $1 billion.
rest of the Botox should be discarded, Mr. Goldsmith says.
$1,000 vial, according to the complaint.
that have been approved by the FDA.
smaller vials are still promoted for multi-use by Allergan."
drug to physicians and consumers in a single year -- 2007.
and other promotional forums hosted or promoted by Allergan."
pushing Botox for uses warned against on its label.
A copy of the Complaint in Goldsmith v. Allergen, Inc., Case No.
Case No. BC422833 (Calif. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty.), on Sept.
without any merit and intends to vigorously defend the case.
Change" anti-aging skin care products, "Parfume de Vanille"
Off" hair removal and depilatory products, "Wash 'N Curl"
The law firm of Finkelstein & Krinsk LLP initiated Baxter v.
Intelius, et al., Case No., 09-CV-1031 (C.D. Calif.), last week.
recognize and dispute the charges.
be a member of the class represented by the complaint.
company's Aug. 14, 2009, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
won dismissal of In Re Pineapples Antitrust Litigation, MDL No.
threatening competitors, and by pursuing sham litigation.
jury to conclude that Fresh Del Monte pursued sham litigation.
Co. in the McDarby v. Merck, Docket No. L-1296-05 (N.J. Super.
earlier court's compensatory award of $3 million for Mr.
for the McDarby family, we are saddened by the fact that Mr.
McDarby did not survive the delays in the appellate process,"
said Jerry Kristal, one of the members of the McDarby trial team.
compensatory, punitive and consumer fraud damages.
damage and consumer fraud awards.
relief was not allowed by the Act.
compensatory verdict of $4.5 million.
award to compensate for his injuries arising from Vioxx.
the drug, citing an Aug. 3 regulatory filing.
(S.D.N.Y., filed Sept. 26, 2007).
Case No. 07-cv-08375 (S.D.N.Y.) (Daniels, J.), in the U.S.
Frederick W. Gerkens, III, Esq.
On June 16, 2009, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint.
permission to appeal the class certification order.
The plaintiffs in Johnson, et al. v. POZEN Inc., et al., Case No.
The Court dismissed the claims in their entirety with prejudice.
in which to appeal the court's decision.
of acute and chronic pain and other pain-related conditions.
Market under the symbol "POZN".
the Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas.
neighborhood where its factory stood.
have all stood shoulder-to-shoulder on this."
instead focused on showing the plume damaged property values.
bought E-Systems in 1995, it inherited the pollution headache.
one notified residents of the problem until 2008.
Raytheon has submitted a 2,200-page cleanup plan to the state.
Landis Vernon Curry, III, Esq.
Benjamin H. Hill, III, Esq.
LEVIN, PAPANTONIO, THOMAS, MITCHELL, ET AL.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Esq.
and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
Litigation requested that Asher, et al. v. Citigroup Inc., et al.
re Citigroup Inc. Bond Litigation.
contracts, options, swaps and forward contracts.
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
In re MAT Five Securities Litigation.
The suit is a putative class action concerning Falcon Plus.
by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
which were underwritten by Citigroup Global Markets Inc.
according to Smith Barney Diversified Futures Fund L.P.'s Aug.
The class-action suit, ECA Acquisitions, Inc. et al. v.
MAT Two LLC, and MAT Three LLC.
Defendants removed the putative class action to the U.S.
On July 15, 2009, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint.
Huberman v. Tag-It Pacific, Inc., et al., is awaiting approval.
Talon International Inc. was formerly Tag-It Pacific, Inc.
1934,as amended, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
company's publicly traded securities during the period from Nov.
14, 2003, to Aug. 12, 2005.
and Section 20(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
which motion was denied by the court on July 17, 2006.
2007, and ordered completion of discovery by March 19, 2007.
- the court entered judgment in favor of all the defendants.
company's brief was filed on Nov. 28, 2007.
The Ninth Circuit held oral arguments on Oct. 23, 2008.
remanding for further proceedings consistent with its decision.
2009 (Class Action Reporter, April 28, 2009).
June 15, 2009 (Class Action Reporter, June 8, 2009).
Case No. 05-CV-7352 (C.D. Calif.) (Real, J.).
6 E. 45th St., 4th Fl.
fiscal year ended July 3, 2009.
Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the SEC [17 C.F.R. Sec.
and misleading financial reports prepared by the Defendants.
July 1, 2009, on a volume of 1.5 million shares.
inflated prices that were paid.
serve as your counsel in this action.
securities multi-district and consolidated litigation.
All e-mail correspondence should make reference to Immersion.
CONTACT: Gregory Mark Nespole, Esq.
11 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933.
approximately 30 percent during this period.
papers no later than November 23, 2009.
Siebott or Joseph R. Seidman, Jr. at (877) 779-1414.
"Plaintiffs' Hot List" in each of the last six years.
online at http://www.bernlieb.com/or obtain them from the court.
20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
generating deposits and originating loans.
materially false and misleading at all relevant times.
losses on nonperforming loans and other real estate owned assets.
share, on unusually heavy volume.
CONTACT: Brian D. Brooks, Esq.

References: v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.