Source: https://camerapenaletrento.it/formazione/documenti/assistenza-legale-e-cedu/
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 17:09:01+00:00

Document:
Estratto delle pronunce della Corte Europea dei Diritti umani che ritengono l'assistenza effettiva di un avvocato per chiunque venga accusato sia elemento fondante di un processo equo.
given it free when the interests of justice so require”.
that it has no application to “pre-trial proceedings” (§ 36 of the judgment).
The Court has reiterated the above principle many times.
24 hours of his detention when no lawyer was present.
Whether or not pressure was exerted on the applicant in the absence of a lawyer.
statements he had made at that time had been central to his conviction.
police custody admitting his guilt.
member, did not have the assistance of a lawyer while he was in police custody.
applicant had remained silent while in police custody.
to inform the applicant of his right to remain silent.
that the lack of legal assistance to the applicant at the initial stages of police questioning had affected irreversibly his defence rights and undermined the possibility of him receiving a fair trial.
denied any involvement in the offences imputed to him by the interviewing officers.
Violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) taken together with Article 6 § 1.
relevant legal provisions breached Article 6.
would defend himself at the trial.
the charges by the first instance court whose judgment was confirmed on appeal.
assisted by a lawyer had been free and unambiguous.
based on statements made without the assistance of a lawyer.
applicant had not become legally represented until having spent three days in detention.
Article 6 § 3 (c).
his right to consult a lawyer prior to first police questioning.
Violation of Article 6 §§ 1 and 3 (c).
effectively in his criminal trial and lack of adequate legal representation.
Violation of Article 6 § 1 in conjunction with Article 6 § 3 (c).
who had been denied access to a lawyer.
Violation of Article 6 § 3 (c) taken in conjunction with Article 6 § 1.
him confess to a robbery.
upon release, pointed to the conclusion that it might not have been given freely.
• Whether or not pressure was exerted on the applicant in the absence of a lawyer.

References: § 3
 § 1
 § 3
 § 1
 § 3
 § 3
 § 1