Source: https://www.answering-islam.org/authors/shamoun/gods_of_islam.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 00:56:56+00:00

Document:
The Message of the Qur'an: Worship of Allah Alone?
we furnished evidence showing that the Quran is anything but a linguistic miracle, and further documented that the Islamic scripture doesn’t present a consistent, coherent message, especially as it relates to monotheism. The Quran often leaves out important words and expressions which, in turn, results in the Muslim scripture presenting a multiplicity of divine beings. It even has the Islamic deity praising, glorifying, and worshiping someone besides himself as Allah.
According to the Islamic position, the speaker or narrator of the Quran is supposed to be Allah himself, e.g., Allah is said to be the one who is doing the talking all throughout the Quran. This means that it is Allah who is stating that the things just said about Jesus in the prior verses (vv. 16-33) are true, and that it is beneath his glory to take a son.
Yet this also means that it is Allah who says in v. 36 that Allah is his lord whom others should serve!
The problem, however, is that the supposed words of Jesus end at v. 33, and Allah resumes speaking from v. 34 onwards. There is absolutely nothing in the immediate context which even remotely suggests that v. 36 is quoting Christ once again.
“And peace be on me the day I was given birth and the day I die and the day I am raised up, living. And, truly, God is my Lord and your Lord, so worship Him. This is a straight path.” That is Jesus son of Mary, a saying of The Truth. They contest what is in it.
At least this arrangement leaves no doubt that v. 36 is meant to be a continuation of Jesus’ alleged words.
The preceding was taken from the following source.
The translators obviously saw the problem and tried to hide or obscure it by adding explanatory words within brackets or parentheses. In some cases they didn’t even bother to provide brackets or parentheses, thereby giving the misleading impression that these extra words are actually part of the Arabic text!
As it stands, the way v. 36 has been formulated leaves Muslims with the inescapable problem of Allah glorifying someone else as Allah and submitting to another deity besides himself as his very own lord.
Like the previous citation, there is nothing in the immediate context to indicate that there is a change in speakers, nothing to even remotely suggest that Allah’s words have been interrupted in order to allow for the speech of others to be interjected at this point.
In light of this fact, this reference simply reinforces the point of Allah having a lord over him whom he worships and glorifies. At the very least, it shows that the Quran is written in such a way as to make it appear as if Allah is actually subservient to another god besides him whom he even calls Allah and refers to him as his own lord.
So much for the Quran being a linguistic miracle whose grammatical structure is flawless and beyond the ability of any finite creature to imitate or reproduce.
Yet in the case of v. 36, there is no such imperative in the Arabic which would signify that these are the words which Allah commanded Muhammad to say.
If the Quran were really clear and completely detailed then we wouldn’t have Muslims divided over whether these words were uttered by Jesus or Muhammad. In fact, if the Muslim scripture was truly complete then we would expect that Q. 19:36 would have either included the word qul in case this was supposed to be Muhammad speaking, or added the words “Jesus also/further said,” if indeed the Quran’s author(s) didn’t want us to assume that the words mentioned in this text were actually spoken by Allah himself.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.