Source: https://www.ucmjdefense.com/resources/nonjudicial-punishment-njp/the-relationship-between-article-15s-and-courts-martial/admitting-nonrelated-other-past-misconduct-formal-article-15s-during-the-presentencing-proceeding.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 22:34:33+00:00

Document:
Admitting nonrelated (other past misconduct) formal Article 15s during the presentencing proceeding.
Admissible at trial by court-martial during presentencing as a record from personnel records. R.C.M. 1001(b)(2).
Record of nonjudicial punishment is incomplete.
g., United States v.Rimmer , 39 M.J. 1083 (A.C.M.R. 1994) (holding that record inadmissible because the form had no indication whether soldier appealed). See also United States v. Godden , 44 M.J. 716 (A.F. Ct. Crim. App. 1996) (holding that administrative errors on record did not affect any procedural due process rights of appellant and record admissible).
Record not maintained in accordance with regulation.
Record does not indicate that the accused had the opportunity to consult with counsel and the accused waived his/her right to demand trial by court-martial. U.S. v. Booker, 5 M.J. 238 (C.M.A. 1978); U.S. v. Kelley, 45 M.J. 259 (1996).
Record does not have discernible signatures. United States. v. Dyke , 16 M.J. 426 (C.M.A. 1983).
Appeal incomplete. United States v. Yarbough, 33 M.J. 122 (C.M.A. 1991).
Irregular procedure. United States v. Haynes , 10 M.J. 694 (A.C.M.R. 1981).
May be considered in administrative proceedings.
Article 15s during the presentencing proceeding.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.