Source: http://ufdc.ufl.edu/WL00003086/00001
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 07:00:29+00:00

Document:
gation, but is as broad as the needs of commerce."
bow before the "superior power" of Congress.
E USee United States v. Gerlach Live Stock Co., 339 U: S. 726, 737 (1950).
m,.seeRipr, s pp..22-~ L, See alSot.fra, p. 47.
mOM lahoma v. AtkaMfnw, 81U. .S; 08,534-385 (1941).
5 Elliot, DEBATE ON TH FE=AL CONTrITUTMON, 128-132 (rev. ed.4.184).
important clause" come into being almost as an afterthought."
ernment might subsequently acquire. Dred Bcoft v. Sandford, 19 How.
272-275 (1901) ; Dorr v. United 4tates8, 195:U S. I8, 139-149 (1904).
being, almost as an afterthought, and towards the en6d o the Convention."
Warren, THa MAKING or THE CoNaTrurTIno, p 600 (1987).
rei. dei., 310io' .Sti (1940).
works employed in generating and distributing electric energy; Ruddy v.
satisfy any debt contracted prior to issuanee of patent therefore; Arizona v.
Act of becemnber 19,'913, 8,8 Stat. 24C, 245.
reh. den., 310 U. S. 657 (1940).
'Utah i r 'i ght o. v. Unite? States, 243 U. S. ,89; 404-405 (1917).
_!P4PfWe ld v. United Statea, 167 U. S. 18, 528,(1897).
Sa .ag v'.' oaorado, L'0 U. S. 46 (1907).
portant designs, and is incompatible with the language of the constitution."
4 Wheat. 316, 424 (U. S. 1819).
their relation to irrigation, see infra, pp. 154-167.
"'I Wiel, WATER RWCrTS. THFp WESTERN TATES, 18, p. 1 C3d ed. 1911).
nection, Vattel has said: !
included in it,as lands, lakes, rivers, etc.
m 2 Kinney, IBBiR ATION ANDy WATER RIGHTSi 1112 (2d ed. 1912).
PvaD TO THE Co0Ift Ar Ni AinABS -ONATIXoNS -AN M SOVbBEtG, Bk; I, ch.
XXII, $268, p.'120 (Citty's 5th American ed. 1889). "
agricultural use without artificial irrigation.
Tx WBIaNGS ow THOMAs JETEBr N, p. 18 (memorial ed.1904).
voL v, p. 449 (Dickins and Forney ed.).
Ali U. 142, 156 (198).
"Atchifsou v. Petero, 20 Wall. 507, 510 (U. S. 1874).
w OaftIorZ a Oregon Pojcr,'0o. v. Beaver 'ortlald aOemedt Qo., 296 U. S.
aiIpotritio~rt bat not beyond that reasonably required and actually used.
ptrpapi *." Artisapst v. COaifornia, 298 U. S. 558. 565-566 (1986).
See ai6o I,,ra, pp. 156-15.
to be reduced to possession so as to become property, wpLch may be XSae4.
.oust prior ,appropriators under the possessory system.1"
preemption and included .this provision, in Section 9: 1"
-jured for such:injury or damage.
the Act of 1870 that .
fied as part of 43 U. S. C. 661.
codified as part of 43 S. 0. 661.
which allowed desert land entries with a proviso that:"
Jenonis Vr. Ki*c, 98 U. S. 4538, 48 (1898).
A" tchison v. Peterson, 20 Wall. 507, 513 (U. S. 1874).
Basey G. alagher, 20 WaUl. 670, 683-684 (U. S. 1874).
a20Wat. at 1 1. Of. Sturr V.Beck, 1388 U. S. 541(189).
SBroder v. Water Company,101 U. S. 274,275 (1879).
United States v. G(erk4a Live Block Co., 889 U. S. 725,748 (1950).
Act of March 8, 1877, 1 1, 19 Stat. 877, as amended, 48 U; 821.
and South Dakota. 1 3, 8, 19 Stat8-77, as amended, 48 U.S. 828.
Co. v. Beaver Portlan Cement Co., that:.: ,. .
O Clfonrd& Orego, Pfoser Co. v. BeaPer PPortias Cemen Co., 295 U. 8.
California Oregon Power Co., v. Beaver Portland Cement Co., 295 U. S.
preemption claimant." 295 U. S. at 162.
U 296 U. S. at 162.
States v. Gerlack. Lie Stock Up., 339J.8. 725,,747-748 (1950).
i ;,itogeth eroi t ~ip~s f them ap arately.
"* t95 .& at:3- v. Ro ,e I o 14 .. 70 ( .
United Btates v. RBio Grnde Irrigation Co., 174 U. 8. 690, 703 (18980).
lands by administrative action, as well as by a treaty."
States to control it for the purpose of navigation.
exercise of its delegated powers is governmental.
ee infra, pp. M-5't, 249-250.
SUnited States v. Walker River Irr. Dist., 104 F. 88334, 3338 (0. A.
9,i19839 Uniited Mstes'v. Mel#tire, 101 f. 2d 650,-658-64 (0. A. 9, 193).
298 U. S. 558,' 50 (1936).
.i1283 .1.i. 428, 45i (i931). .
SSee BBIE= FOB THE UNrITM STATES OF AMEE CA, INTERVjWO, fNe raska v.
Wyoming, October Term, 1944, No. 6 Origbial, pp. tiZ- decided 825 U. S.
SSee, e. ., 2 'Kinney, 1fateABrGAT AND WATEB RIAGS pp. 1098-1124 (2d ed.
284,16U.S^.581 8,t -- \ < .. / : A "
S260 ps. Att'yGen. 4ai 426 (1907).
ary 1, 1905, 1 4, 33 Stat. 628, 16 U. 8. C. 524.
"*otah Powier'd L#kt Co. v. Uitited States, 248 1.. 8.89, 405 (1917).
sion of irrigation, see Chapter 5, infra, pp. 151-258.
on state rights by Itfe creation of a numerous "tenantry"
within their borders, its 1840 decision in United. states v.
was for the discretion ofCongress." .
U. S. 288, 3301, 3386 (1936).
U. S. C. 371 et seq.
lw 14 Pet. 526, 538 (U. S. 1840).
192 Fed. 583, 594 (C. C. I. Idaho 1911).
West, the court declared that:"
project lands where there results a lessening of cost to project lands.
2 179 Fed. at 9.
.i, ivehtAnd baiboiuifor the benefit of navigation.
Another feature of reclamation legislation- prits a t ere.
objectives of the Reclamation Act were reviewed in detail.
Itrarrtepub laedrnas, 2 t. 48. 423;, 4B't19I1); But 'In htited Otates v.
certain Indian eservatlons could be considered "the- consent of Congress"
authority. 295 U. S. 174, 184-185 (1935).
Act of June 17,1902, i 7,32 Stat. 388,389,43 U. S. C. 421.
"* 8, 82 Stat 890, 48 U. S. 888, 372.
take them under its power of emfiieht domain.
: navigable aa well as nonaavigable streams .. ; .- .
United States v. Gerlao L4ve Stook Co., 389 U. S. 72f, T78 (1*50').
-ftatesj 282 1t.'S 8.9, 407 (1981y. Footnote at end.ok4q ote omitted.
S389 U. S. at 761.
ment for him as for any poer appropriators in thatstate.
the United States intends to make use of those waters.
U. S. 186, 198-19Q i(Q87) ; Udted States v. West Side rrigating Co., 230 Fed.
& Power Co.,'97 F. 24 38, 42 (0. 9,1 3),ct. den., 305U. S. 630 (198).
328 U. S. 152, 164, 175-177 (1946).
m325 U. S. 589, 614 (1945).
~ N. Max. STAT. ANiN. (1941) Vol. 5, 77-531. Of. OKLA. STAT. ANN.
(perm. ed.) Title 82, J 91.
"Larsonu v. BawDetio d Foreign Corp., 884U. 8.2 702; n. 26 ,(198).
of the ritts i the plainfirfs made by his predecessor in 6ofice. 800 U. 8.
but settled and determined by his predecessors in ofice. (Emphasis added).
firmed, 179 Fed. 1 (C. A. 9, 1910).
S I"Heenel v.' Uhited States, 287 U. S. 43, 50 (1915).
.astehentsY1;i'' -* '..... ... .
of national defense and navigation:"- .
SUnite.,s ta6 wa fi&r, =, U. 90, Sw (104S).
.. .,rtrnows Co. v. United States, 257 U. S.i18, 14514 (1921 ).
Nampa& Meridian Irr. Dist. v. Bond, 28 U. S. 50 (1925).
Muolen Benevolent Corp. v. United States, 290 U. S. 89,91 (1988).
'Ashander v. Tennessee Valley Authorlit, 297U. S. 288, 385 (1986).
*U297 U... at 330. This is but a logical eulmlnaalan tf tA.prindple/l-.
the Congress by 3 of Article IV of the Constitutioin.
Concerns reserved to the States.
Dunbar Co., 229 U. S. 58 (1918). ee supra, pp. 19-21.
m 297 U. S. at 338.
m 297 U. S. at 338-389.
.Teneassee BRectric Power Co. v. Tennessee VaUey Authority, 21 F. Supp.
947 (D. C. Tenn. 1938).
in competition with energy offered forisale by private utilities.
Tennessee Electri, Power Co. v. Tennessee VaUey Authority, 808 U. S.
Grant v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 49 Supp. 564. (p. C. Tenn. 1942).
See also Atchley v. Teireeyss Valley Autitt, 6 9 F. Siipp. 952 (D. C. Ala.
m49 P. Supp. at 566.
*" The Siren, 7 Wall. 152, 154 (U. S. 1868).
SUnited States v. S~Herwoo, 812 U. S. 584, 590 (1914); III. Cent R. R. Co.
v. Public Utilities Commission, 245 U. S. 493, 504 (1918) .
any court jurisdiction of a suit against the United States'..
ure of what commonly is known as the police power.
M ite ot6 V. United States, 305 U. 8. 382, 388-389 (1939) ; Stanley v.
Sohwalby, 162 U. S. 255, 270 (1896).
M'l mesota v. United States, 305 U. S. 382, 86 (1939).
'Stanley v. SBoalb 192 U. 255, 270 (1896).
332 U. S. 804 (1947).
Corp. v. united States, 290 U. S. 89,'94 (1938).
Utalh Power & IAht Co. v. United States, 243 U. S. 389, 405 (1917).
"243 U. S. at 404.
Art. I, 8, el. 17.
2 ColUns v. Yosemite Park & Curry Co., 804 U. S. 518, 530 (1938).
In addition to its :constitutional power to "declare War,"
2"Standard Oil Co. of California v. Californa, 291 U. S. 242, 244 (1984).
m Fort Leavenwort& R. Co. v. Lowe, 114 U 25, 539 (1885).
114 U. S. at 527.
U. $,CoNsr., Art I, 1 8,els. 1,11; Art. I, 19, cl. 7.
'Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley Authority, 297 U. S. 288 (1966).
Act ot JuneS, 19o J 124, 89 Stat 106, 215, 50 U. S. C,79.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 

v. 
 V. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.