Source: https://www.currentfederaltaxdevelopments.com/?offset=1537526730025
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 04:28:55+00:00

Document:
The IRS has announced relief from filing deadlines for taxpayers impacted by Hurricane Florence in News Release NC-2018-03.
The safe harbor explanations as modified by this notice take into consideration certain legislative changes and recent guidance, including changes related to qualified plan loan offsets (as defined in section 13613 of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”), P.L. 115-97) and guidance issued on self-certification of eligibility for a waiver of the deadline for completing a rollover (described in Rev. Proc. 2016-47, 2016-37 I.R.B. 346), and include other clarifying changes.
The state of Colorado has issued emergency rules (Regulation 39-26-102 (1.3); Regulation 39-26-102 (9)) that would impose requirement on out of state sellers to collect Colorado. The collection would be required effective on November 30, 2018.
The IRS has sent regulations related to capital gains invested in Opportunity Zones to the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget (RIN 1545-BP03). The regulation is flagged as a Tax Cuts and Jobs Act regulatory action, meaning that OMB has 10 business days to complete its review of these regulations under the agency’s memorandum of agreement with the Department of Treasury.
The regulations were received by the agency on September 12, which would put the date by which OMB is supposed to finish its review prior to end of September.
The key factor to sustaining a taxpayer’s claim to be a real estate professional in cases before the Tax Court generally comes down to whether the taxpayer has sufficient and reliable records to back up their activity. In the case of Birdsong v. Commissioner, TC Memo 2018-148 the taxpayer’s records were found to be sufficient to sustain her contention that she was a real estate professional.
In a Project Manager Technical Advice addressed to the IRS Taxpayer Advocate and the Commissioner of the Wage and Investment Division, the Chief Counsel’s office concluded that the IRS can use the math authority to correct errors in the earned income tax credit, child tax credit, additional child tax credit and the American opportunity tax credit even if the return has already been processed and a refund issued (PMTA 2018-017).
In the case of Toso, et al v. Commissioner, 115 TC No. 4, the Tax Court considered issues related to passive foreign investment company (PFIC) gains. Specifically, the Court looked at how gains taxed under the rules of IRC §1291(a) will be counted for purposes of determining if there is a substantial omission from gross income under IRC §6501(e)(1)(A)(i) that would allow for a six-year statute of limitations.
As states scramble to begin collecting sales taxes after the Supreme Court’s decision in the case of South Dakota v. Wayfair, one state that has not yet been able to begin collecting the tax is, of all things, the state of South Dakota itself. Those who have read the Supreme Court’s decision will remember that the decision did not actually formally approve South Dakota’s law and order the defendants to pay the taxes. Rather, the case was sent back down to South Dakota state courts to consider other potential objections.
In order to get around this problem, the Governor of the State of South Dakota has called a special session of the state legislature for September 12 and issued two draft pieces of legislation to allow the state to begin collecting taxes from remote sellers beginning on November 1, 2018.
Close only counts in horseshoes and hand grenades as the saying goes--and tax relief provisions are in neither category as the taxpayer in the case of Thompson v. United States, Case No. 3:18-cv-01675, US DC ND CA discovered. The problem arose over an exception to the 10% premature distribution tax of IRC §72(t) for distributions made on account of a levy under IRC §6331.
On August 31, 2018 the President signed an executive order entitled “Executive Order on Strengthening Retirement Security in America” that was aimed at increasing the number of employees being offered retirement programs via their employer and to slow the required distributions from such plans. The order contains instructions for the Department of Labor and Treasury Department to consider various revisions to requirements related to qualified retirement plans.
In PLR 201835017 the IRS granted a taxpayer a waiver of the 60-day deadline to roll over a distribution she received from a qualified retirement plan. She received this relief because she claimed she had previously relied on her spouse to handle all tax and financial matters, but the couple had separated during the 60-day period.
In the case of Harbor Lofts Associates et al. v. Commissioner, 151 TC No. 3 the Tax Court ruled that a long term lease holder did not hold a qualified real property interest which could qualify for a deduction for the donation of a conservation easement.
In News Release IR-2018-175 warned tax professionals that a failure to prepare a written data security represents a violation of the FTC’s Safeguards Rules and the that the IRS may treat a violation of the FTC Safeguards Rule as a violation of the standards for authorized IRS e-file providers under Revenue Procedure 2007-40.
The IRS Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee (ETAAC) members noted in June that they believe fewer than half of all tax professionals are aware of the FTC rule and have written plans in compliance with the rule.
The IRS has issued Notice 2018-70 to clarify the definition of a qualifying relative and exemption amount following changes made in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
The much anticipated proposed regulations to deal with the various credits that could be used to work around the newly imposed limitation found at IRC §164(b)(6) on deductions for state and local taxes have been released by the IRS (REG-112176-18). The resulting rules are going to affect both the new workaround credits passed by New York, Connecticut, New Jersey and other states following the passage of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, as well as already existing credits in other states.
The credits in question give taxpayers a credit for all or a very significant portion of the contribution made as a direct reduction in state income taxes or property taxes. Credits of this type had existed for years, being especially popular as credits for making contributions to organizations that provided scholarships or financial support to students attending private primary and secondary schools.
Congress anticipated that, due to the reduction of the corporate tax rate found in the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), certain S corporations would wish to terminate their election to become a C corporation. Because of this, Congress added certain special rules that would apply to S corporations that revoked their status within two years of the date of enactment of TCJA.
In Notice 2018-67 the IRS has provided rules to deal with separate trade or business issues for Unrelated Business Income found in IRC §512(a)(6) as added by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.

References: v. 
 v. 
 §1291
 §6501
 v. 
 v. 
 §72
 §6331
 v. 
 §164
 §512