Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/22565156/CRS-Immigration-Policy-on-Expedited-Removal-of-Aliens-January-30-2008
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 12:47:45+00:00

Document:
expedited removal was only applied to aliens at ports of entry.
removal (H.R. 519 and H.R.3638), codify current policy (H.R. 750, H.R. 2413,H.R.
2954, and H.R. 4065), or add ne w protections for those in ex pedited removal (S.
estimated 12 million unauthorized aliens in the United States.
January 2006, expedited removal was reportedly expanded along all U.S. borders.
a set of policy, resource, and logistical questions.
INA §235(b)(1)(A)(i); 8 U.S.C. §1225(b)(1)(A)(i).
citizenship; and, aliens previously removed.
that unaccompanied minors should be placed in expedited rem oval in limited circumstances.
§240 see Appendix A. For m ore on credible fear, see CRS Report RL32621, U.S.
Immigration Policy on Asylum Seekers, by Ruth Ellen Wasem.
Federal Register 10311, March 6, 1997.
Nationality Act; Notice,” 67 Federal Register 68923, November 13, 2002.
the 14-day period immediately preceding the date of encounter.
the Ma riel boa tlift, l asted only a fe w months, it c ast a long sha dow ove r U.S.
plausible asylum claim. The House took no action on H.R. 2836, but approved H.R.
2602, a similar bill that would have created a summary exclusion process.
asylum in the United States at that time.
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996 (IIRIRA; P.L.
asylum officer then makes the “credible fear” determination of t he alien’s claim.
§302 of H.R. 2202 in the 104th Congress.
Policy on Asylum Seekers, by Ruth Ellen Wasem.
at the USCIS website [http://uscis.gov/graphics/services/asylum/paths.htm#seekers].
officer’s determination that the alien does not have a credible fear of persecution.
provisions on a more limited and controlled basis.
in the [INS] Commissioner’s discretion, such action is operationally warranted.
be considered an arriving alien for purposes of §235(b)(1)(A)(i) ofthe act.” 8 CFR §1.1(q).
Federal Register 10313, March 6, 1997.
23 I&N December 572 (A.G. 2003).
U.S. Immigration Policy on Haitian Migrants, by Ruth Ellen Wasem.
for the 14-day period immediately preceding the date of encounter.
as it is not possible to initiate formal removal proceedings against all of the aliens.
Fear, and Withdrawal, FY 2000-2003, February 2005.
Cubans are not subject to expedited removal under this regulation.
Federal Register 48877, August 11, 2004.
Federal Register 48877-48881, August 11, 2004.
aliens may not depart from the United States.
by Blas Nuñez-Neto, Alison Siskin, and Stephen Viña.
Immigration on the Southwest Border, hearing s, 109 th Cong ., 2 nd sess., J uly, 12, 2005.
Monke, Lisa Seghetti, and Stephen Viña.
being detained. Additionally, asylum seekers are often detained with criminal aliens.
Freedom, Study on Asylum Seekers in Expedited Removal, February 2005.
removal are subject to mandatory detention.
Ruth Ellen Wasem. This report is archived and available from the author.
Seekers, February 1999. p. 1.
Phone call with Maureen Stanton, INS Congressional Affairs, August 6, 2002.
Executive Office for Immigration Review (asylum, immigration and removal hearings).
Transforming Immigration Programs GAO-05-81, October 2004.
Expedited Removal, Executive Summary, p. 4, February 2005.
access to more types of relief from removal than those in expedited removal.
Strategies to Improve National Security, hearing 109 th Cong ., 1st sess., J une 7, 2005.
aliens undergo their removal proceedings while they are serving their criminal sentences.
of Expedited Removal to Certain Jails in Texas, November 22, 1999.
Andorra Bruno and Alison Siskin.
Kenny, DHS Announces Unprecedented Expansion of Expedited Removal to the Interior.
expedited removal has been a deterrent to those trying to enter the country illegally.
Federal Register 10319, March 6, 1997.
Federal Register 10357, March 6, 1997.
Border in Crisis: Resources and Strategies to Improve National Security.
Aguilar, Coping with Illegal Immigration on the Southwest Border.
aliens, and USCIS asylum officers, to conduct the additional credible fear hearings.
Director of the O ffice of D etention and R emoval Operations, Dav id Venturella, in U.S.
Howard Mintz, “Fight for Refuge,” San Jose Mercury News, September 18, 2005, p. 1.
is in removal proceedings. Mintz, Fight for Refuge, p. 1.
place, and manner of entry, thereby establishing eligibility for expedited removal.
Detention of Noncitizens in the United States, by Alison Siskin and Margaret Mikyung Lee.
or paroled into the United States; and (3) notto have been physically present for two years.
Reeves County Bureau of Prisons Contract Facility.
Federal Register, vol. 62, no. 44, p. 10313 (March 6, 1997).
Sensenbrenner on November 7, 2007.
United States continuously for two y ears, would be subject to ex pedited removal.
introduced on June 18, 2007.
part of the immigration statute the alien is being charged with violating.
master calender hearing if both the g overnment and the alien agree to the relief.
deportable, or eligible for relief from removal.
Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review, FY2004 Statistical Yearbook, pp. 24-26.
judge summarily rules on removability.
admitted, then the burden shifts back to DHS to prove that the alien is deport able.
and number of motions to reopen93 and reconsider94 removal cases for the alien.
Gordon, Charles, et al. Immigration Law and Procedure §64.11.
classification or take advantage of the registry.
removal. Gordon, Charles, et al. Immigration Law and Procedure §64.18.
reconsider may be filed. Charles Gordon, et al. Immigration Law and Procedure §64.19.

References: §235
 §1225

§240

§302
 §235
 §1
 §64
 §64
 §64