Source: http://masslegalresources.com/commonwealth-v-rarick-lawyers-weekly-no-11-047-15
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 16:07:53+00:00

Document:
COMMONWEALTH vs. KEITH R. RARICK.
Berkshire. January 29, 2015. – May 8, 2015.
Division of the District Court Department on January 4, 2013.
The case was tried before Rita S. Koenigs, J.
John O. Mitchell for the defendant.
Commonwealth’s case and at the close of the evidence, we affirm.
incident in front of the Waubeeka Golf Course.
and he did not have to lean against his vehicle for balance.
the defendant’s ability to drive when they left the party.
revealed a blood alcohol percentage of 0.00. Id. at 363, 378.
378, quoting from Commonwealth v. Connolly, 394 Mass. at 173.
v. Sudderth, 37 Mass. App. Ct. at 321. Contrast Commonwealth v.
driver] showed any signs of impairment during their encounter”).
Commonwealth v. Brown, 83 Mass. App. Ct. 772, 774 n.1 (2013).
conclusion. Latimore, 378 Mass. at 677, quoting from Jackson v.
ultimate facts.” Jackson v. Virginia, supra at 319.
Conclusion. The essential teaching of Commonwealth v.
testimony, or assign only little weight to it.

References: v. 

v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.