Source: http://www.erisa-benefits.com/Resolved-Cases.shtml
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 00:04:18+00:00

Document:
Henselmeier et al. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Company, United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, Indianapolis Division; claim for pension benefits; anti-cutback rules.
In Re Fremont General Corporation ERISA Litigation, United States District Court for the Central District of California; class action, company stock drop, 401(k) and ESOP.
Watson et al. v. Consolidated Edison et al., United States District Court for the Southern District of New York; class action litigation over early retirement program and communication of pension options.
Cooke v. Karlseng Arbitration, JAMS Reference 1310016622; dispute regarding the design of an age-weighted, cross tested retirement plan.
Bell et al. v. Edward Jones & Company, L.P. FINRA Arbitration; fiduciary claims against investment manager and firm.
Elliott et al. v. Mulloy et al. (Cushenberry Mine Trustees), United States District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern Division; dispute over residual trust assets.
In re: Broadwing, Inc. ERISA Litigation, United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Western Division (Cincinnati); class action regarding 401(k) plan.
Miller et al. v. Wachovia, Circuit Court of Jackson County Missouri at Kansas City; litigation over plan valuation and performance, multi-employer plan.
Woolard v. Woolard, 48th Judicial District Court of Tarrant County, TX; post divorce dispute over qualified and nonqualified pension plans.
National Heritage Academies, Inc v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division, dispute regarding over charges and hidden costs in PPO health plan.
Huskin et. al. v. Union Central National Group, Inc and Verity National Group ,Inc , United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division, dispute over AD&D and life insurance benefits provided through a workers compensation, non-subscribed plan.
Hill v. Dyncorp, et al., United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division; post employment, executive compensation dispute.
In The Matter of the Marriage of Linda Nanette Kondraske and George Vincent Kondraske, 360th Judicial District, Tarrant County, Texas; dispute over contingent incentive compensation payments.
Keefer v. Christus Health, et al., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division; claim for medical and income replacement benefits under occupational injury assistance plan.
Lehman v. Chevron Texaco, Inc., United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas Marshall Division; severance plan litigation.
Whisenhunt v. Decisionone Corporation, AETNA Life Insurance, Communicare HMO, Inc and Mercer, Inc., United States District Court for the District of Oklahoma; COBRA litigation.
Kapok Management L.P. et al. v. Associated Insurance Services, Inc.; United States District Court, Northern District of Texas, Amarillo Division; TPA dispute.
Wright v. Hamrick Insurance Services, Inc., State District Court for McDowell County, West Virginia; dispute over third party administrative services.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.