Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/321204635/United-States-v-Osborne-514-F-3d-377-4th-Cir-2008
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 06:12:45+00:00

Document:
for the Western District of Virginia, at Abingdon.
James P. Jones, Chief District Judge.
Before MICHAEL, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
which Judge Michael and Judge Duncan joined.
offense"); (2) armed robbery of a pharmacy, in violation of 18 U.S.C.
intent to distribute OxyContin, in contravention of 21 U.S.C.
only) and McCrae (on all three offenses).
refer to as "Sean Jr."; and Osborne and Sistos two younger children.
dangerous weapon or device." Id. 2118(c)(1).
short of Exit 10, and just north of the state line) into Bristol, Virginia.
counter," and Osborne responding "Okay, okay." J.A. 21.2 Sean Jr.
Sean Jr. could hear it over his own music.
again tightened the hood of his sweatshirt around his face. Sean Jr.
glasses, and started walking toward the Walgreens building. Sean Jr.
to be there when it was happening." Id. at 25-26.
products for sale such as cosmetics and over-the-counter medications.
pharmacy counter through a glass window.
assistant store manager in the store area near the pharmacy section.
counter and told Mabe that he had a question for the pharmacist.
Osborne where the ear medications were located in the store area.
(two full and one partially depleted) of OxyContin 20-milligram tablets stored therein, confirmed with Osborne that the generic equivalent of Valium was acceptable to him, and then removed the Valiumequivalent tablets from the safe.
hated to do this" and that "he wasnt a violent person." Id. at 80.
Sword then handed Osborne the drugs that he had demanded numbering 224 OxyContin 20-milligram tablets and 407 Valiumequivalent tablets which had a total replacement value of $629.
looked directly at Sword and instructed her to "[w]alk me out." Id.
McCrae "came in the door first, and kind of shook his head at me."
then went into the kitchen.
is far enough, and she lock[ed] the door and shut[ ] it").
into the bedroom area of the house, and ordered him to the entryway.
she had not seen him do so.
three knives, and pill bottles for OxyContin 20-milligram tablets identical to those stolen from the Walgreens pharmacy.
two parties [Osborne and McCrae] to commit that crime." J.A. 145.
The district court denied Osbornes motion from the bench.
neither Osborne nor McCrae would be presenting further evidence.
against McCrae on the conspiracy, robbery, and drug offenses.
24, 2006, was again denied by the district court. See Fed. R. Crim. P.
(4th Cir. 1996) (en banc) (quoting Glasser v. United States, 315 U.S.
in the Walgreens building during the robbery and could not have reasonably foreseen that Osborne would abduct the pharmacy employees.
prior to the time that Osborne entered the Walgreens building.
not good" can fairly be interpreted as a reference to the robbery.
taking a role in the robberys commission.
alone. For example, Osborne points out that the "jumping the counter"
for a post-robbery promise to keep quiet about his conduct that night.
instead be inferred from the facts and circumstances of the case.").
exclude every reasonable hypothesis consistent with innocence."
pharmacy. We therefore affirm Osbornes conviction on the conspiracy offense.
for clear error and its legal conclusions de novo." United States v.
101 F.3d 1000, 1003 (4th Cir. 1996).
was forced to accompany an offender to a different location." Id.
States v. Whooten, 279 F.3d 58, 61 (1st Cir. 2002); United States v.
Saknikent, 30 F.3d 1012, 1013 (8th Cir. 1994).
confines of the store are not what the [Guidelines] define[ ] as abduction," in that the victims were never "moved to a different location."
2B3.1(b)(4)(A) "a victim was forced to accompany an offender,"
belief. Nevertheless, we accept for purposes of our review of the abduction enhancement that Sword remained inside the Walgreens building.
abduction with indisputable movement "to a different location."
Osborne acknowledges here, that "even a temporary abduction"
be imposed if the victim was moved only within the confines of a single building.
decision, United States v. Coates, 113 F. Appx 520 (4th Cir. 2004).
a sexual act with a minor under twelve, in contravention of 18 U.S.C.
until he was out of the store. Id.
informed by the general definition of "abducted." See Coates, 113 F.
does not bar the conclusion that movement "to a different location"
building threshold has been crossed.
v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005). See Coates v. United States, 125 S. Ct.
for resentencing. See United States v. Coates, 158 F. Appx 432 (4th Cir.
thresholds, and the like." Id. at 728.
In challenging the district courts finding of "a different location,"
at 61 (recognizing that, by forcing victim outside store and into parking lot at gunpoint, robber "provided himself with a potential hostage"
consequences of isolation" (internal quotation marks omitted)).
basis for imposing the abduction enhancement on Osborne, and we therefore do not assess its merits herein.
to our conclusion that the district court properly imposed the abduction enhancement on him.
offenses (where it involves less than $200) as "petty larceny."
respects." United States v. Tigney, 367 F.3d 200, 201-02 (4th Cir.
2004) (quoting United States v. Harris, 128 F.3d 850, 854 (4th Cir.
offense, "we may look to either state law or the Model Penal Code").
guilty of larceny . . . .
section shall be guilty as provided herein.
conspiracy offense, as well as his sentence on the conspiracy, robbery, and drug offenses.
offense "was similar to an instant offense," i.e., the robbery offense.

References: v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 

v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.