Source: https://www.gtlaw.com/ja/professionals/b/brown-nicholas-a
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 01:30:21+00:00

Document:
Nicholas A. Brown is a trial lawyer whose practice focuses on patent and trade secret litigation. He has tried patent cases at the ITC, in Texas, California, Oregon, New Jersey, and before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. He has also won multiple appeals at the Federal Circuit. He has litigated cases involving a wide range of technologies, including pharmaceuticals, cellular telephone standards, robotics, software, semiconductor manufacturing, and DNA sequencing.
Certain Robotic Vacuum Cleaning Devices And Components Thereof Such As Spare Parts. Representing iLife in ITC investigation involving iRobot patents related to robotic vacuums.
Certain Height-Adjustable Desk Platforms And Components Thereof. Represented Loctek in ITC investigation involving Varidesk patents related to adjustable desk mechanisms.
Swagway v. ITC. Representing Segway and Ninebot in appeal from ITC investigation.
Gonzalez v. Tagged & Gonzalez v. New Life Ventures. As lead counsel for Tagged and New Life Ventures, won judgment of invalidity after trial in E.D.Tex. in patent litigation relating to digital labels for websites.
EFF v. Personal Audio. As lead counsel for EFF, won judgment invalidating Personal Audio’s “podcasting” patent after a trial before the Patent Trials and Appeal Board.
Prolifiq v. Veeva. As lead counsel, represented Prolifiq in patent and trade secret litigation related to software for managing regulated communications for pharmaceuticals and medical devices.
Wildcat IP v. Pokémon, et al. As lead counsel, represented Pokémon in patent litigation relating to electronic trading card systems.
Walker Digital v. MySpace, et al. As lead counsel, represented LinkedIn, MySpace and Tagged against patents asserted against social networks’ use of "friend" relationships.
Teva Women's Health v. Mylan, Teva Women's Health v. Lupin, and related matters. Represented Teva at trial and in subsequent appeal regarding patents covering Seasonique®, as well as in a set of five other related ANDA cases involving patents covering Seasonique®, LoSeasonique® and Cenestin®.
Global Ground Automation v. Orissa, et. al. Represented Global Ground Automation at bench trial in E.D.Tex. involving patent relating to software for ground transportation.
Core Wireless v. LG. Representing LG in patent litigation involving technology related to standards for cellular telephones.
Joao Bock v. Charles Schwab, et. al. Won dismissal with prejudice of 41 of 43 claims for Charles Schwab in patent litigation involving financial services.
Fotomedia v. Tagged, et al. As lead counsel, represented Tagged in patent litigation relating to social networks’ use of technology for displaying, uploading, and managing photos.
Beneficial Innovations v. Demand Media, et al. As lead counsel, represented Demand Media in patent litigation relating to Internet advertising.
°The above representations were handled by Mr. Brown prior to his joining Greenberg Traurig, LLP.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.