Source: https://chestofbooks.com/business/law/Handbook-Law-Of-Contracts/Application-Of-Payments-Part-4.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 22:34:03+00:00

Document:
29 Noyes v. Wyekoff, 114 N. Y. 204, 21 N. E. 158; Abshire v. Corey, 113 Ind. 484, 15 N. E. 685; People's Sav. Bank v. Borough of Norwalk, 56 Conn. 547, 16 Atl. 257; Tillou v. Britton. 9 N. J. Law, 120; Hubbard v. Bank, 8 Cow. (N. Y.) 88. See "Tender," Dee. Dig. (Key-No.) §§ 11, 13; Cent. Dig. §§ 20, 29-32.
30 Leask v. Dew, 102 App. Div. 529, 92 N. Y. Supp. 891. While the creditor may require legal tender money, a tender in other lawful money of the United States is sufficient, if not objected to on the ground of its not being legal tender. Edmunds Electric Const. Co. v. Mariotte, 162 Ind. 329, 69 N. E. 396. See "Tender," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 13; Cent. Dig. §§ 20-32.
31 Te Poel v. Shutt, 57 Neb. 592, 78 N. W. 288. See "Tender, Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 13; Cent. Dig. §§ 29-32.
32 Barbour v. Hickey, 2 App. D. C. 207, 24 L. R. A. 763. See "Tender," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 13; Cent. Dig. §§ 29-32.
33 Beatty v. Miller, 47 Ind. App. 494, 94 N. E. 897; Neal v. Finley, 136 Ky. 346, 124 S. W. 348; Kollitz v. Equitable Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 92 Minn. 234, 99 N. W. 892; Gunby v. Ingram, 57 Wash. 97, 106 Pac. 495, 36 L. R. A. (N. S.) 232; McGrath v. Gegner, 77 Md. 331, 26 Atl. 502, 39 Am. St. Rep. 415. And see Walsh v. Association, 101 Mo. 534, 14 S. W. 722; Gradle v. Warner, 140 111. 123, 29 N. E. 1118. See "Tender," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 15; Cent. Dig. §§ 39-46.
34 Hazard v. Loring. 10 Cush. (Mass.) 267; Hall v. Insurance Co., 57 Conn. 105, 17 Atl. 356; Parker v. Pettit, 43 N. J. Law, 512; Collier v. White. 67 Miss. 133, 6 South. 618; Matbis v. Thomas, 101 Ind. 119; Knight v. Abbott, 30 Vt. 577; Pinney v. Jorgenson, 27 Minn. 26, 6 N. W. 376; Larsen v. Breene, 12 Colo. 480, 21 Pac. 498; Guthman v. Keam, 8 Neb. 502, 1 N. W. 129; Behaly v. Hatch, Walk. (Miss.) 309, 12 Am. Rep. 570; Oakland Bank of Savings v. Applegarth, 67 Cal. 80, 7 Pac. 139, 476; Dungan v. Insurance Co., 46 Md. 469. See "Tender," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 13; Cent. Dig. §§ 29-32.
35 Walsh v. Colvin, 53 Wash. 309, 101 Pac. 1085. See "Tender," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 13; Cent. Dig. §§ 29-32.
41 Vt 66, 98 Am. Dec. 564; Patterson v. Cox, 25 Ind. 261; Perkins v. Beck, 4 Cranch C. C. 68, Fed. Cas. No. 10,984. A tender of 9 cents less than $584.32 due has been held insufficient. Rolfe v. Patrons' Androscoggin Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 106 Me. 345, 76 Atl. 879. But failure to include three days' interest on $40, amounting to 2 cents, has been held immaterial, on the theory that the law does not consider trifles. Matzger v. Page, 62 Wash. 170, 113 Pac. 254. See "Tender," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 13; Cent. Dig. §§ 29-32.
37 Sinclair v. Learned, 51 Mich. 335, 16 N. W. 672; Kincaid v. School Disk, 11 Me. 188; Brown v. Dysinger, 1 Rawle (Pa.) 408; Mahler v. New-baur, 32 Cal.168, 91 Am. Dec. 571; McDougald v. Dougherty, 11 Ga. 570; Johnson v. Smock, 1 N. J. Law, 106. See "Tender," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 6; Cent. Dig. § 8.
38 Carman v. Pultz, 21 N. Y. 547; Wilson v. Doran, 110 N. Y. 101, 17 N. E. 688; Oatinan v. Walker, 33 Me. 67; King v. Finch, 60 Ind. 420; Mc-Iniffe v. Wheelock, 1 Gray (Mass.) 600; Conrad v. Trustees of Grand Grove, 64 Wis. 258, 25 N. W. 24; Billiot v. Robinson, 13 La. Ann. 529; Hoyt v. Byrnes, 11 Me. 475; Cropp v. Hambleton, Cro. Eliz. 48; Carmen v. Pultz, supra. Tender to one of several joint creditors sufficienk Oatman v. Walker, supra; Dawson v. Ewing, 16 Serg. & R. (Pa.) 371; Flanigan v. Seelye, 53 Minn. 23, 55 N. W. 115. See "Tender," Dec. Dig. (Key-No.) § 7; Cent. Dig. §§ 9, 10, 22.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 13
 v. 
 § 13
 v. 
 § 13
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 15
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 13
 v. 
 § 13
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 13
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 6
 § 8
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 7