Source: http://www.overruleroe.com/States/Ohio.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 12:32:16+00:00

Document:
1 Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2901.16 (Baldwin 1953).
2 295 N.E.2d 916 (Ohio 1973). Prior to Roe, the Ohio Supreme Court, in a pair of unreported orders, had dismissed defendant’s appeal in Kruze for want of a substantial constitutional question and overruled his motion for leave to appeal. See State v. Kruze, No. 72-11, March 10, 1972 (Ohio Supreme Court), vacated and remanded, 410 U.S. 951 (1973). In another pre-Roe decision, Ohio’s pre-Roe abortion statute was upheld in an unappealed decision of a three-judge federal district court. See Steinberg v. Brown, 321 F.Supp. 741 (N.D. Ohio 1970).
3 134 Ohio Laws 1868.
5 135 Ohio Laws 988 (1974).
6 See Ohio Rev. Code Ann. § 2919.17 (Anderson 2003). This statute is not currently enforceable. See Women’s Medical Professional Corp. v. Voinovich, 911 F.Supp. 1051, 1078-81 (S.D. Ohio 1995), aff’d, 130 F.3d 187, 203-10 (6th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1036 (1999). A decision of the Ohio Court of Appeals appears to recognize a right to abortion under the liberty language of the Ohio Constitution. See Preterm Cleveland v. Voinovich, 627 N.E.2d 570, 574-75 (Oh. Ct. App. 1993) (upholding informed consent statute). The court held that “the choice of a woman whether to bear a child is one of the liberties guaranteed by Section 1, Article I, Ohio Constitution.” 627 N.E.2d at 575. Whether the Ohio Supreme Court would adopt the reasoning of the court of appeals is unknown because the supreme court denied review See Preterm Cleveland v. Voinovich 624 N.E.2d 194 (Oh. 1993)..

References: § 2901
 v. 
 v. 
 § 2919
 v. 
 v. 
 v.