Source: https://www.websiteattorneys.com/StevenRinehart
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 00:03:26+00:00

Document:
Steven Rinehart 's practice focuses largely on domain name disputes, Internet law, and enforcement of intellectual property (IP) rights. Steve is licensed to practice law before the Commonwealth of Virginia, the State of Utah, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, and the Eastern District of Texas. Steve has handled hundreds of domain name disputes, including UDRP disputes before both WIPO (the World Intellectual Property Organization), the NAF (National Arbitration Forum), the Czech Arbitration Court (CAC), as well as ACPA disputes (Anticybersquatting Consumer Protection Act) before federal courts across the U.S. If you are a trademark owner or a domainer involved is a dispute over rights to the registration of a gTLD or ccTLD (a generic top-level domain such as '.com', '.info', '.org' or a country code domain such as '.ca' or '.co.uk'), Steve may be able to help you protect your intellectual property rights no matter where in the world you reside. Steve attempts to provide all of his clients with cost-effective, expedious representation.
Brigham Young University (BYU): 2000 • Bucking Small Claims Courts, 23 UTAH BAR J. 32, 33–34 (Sep. 4, 2010) (quoted by the Supreme Court in Allen v. Moyer, 2011 UT 44).
University of Utah: 2003 • Rinehart, Steven L., Regular Pro Lege, Si Defict Lex; 63 THE FEDERAL LAWYER 8, 52 - 57 (Sep. 4, 2016).
A list of all recent federal litigation cases handled by Steven Rinehart follows. Please note that this list does not include more than 100 state cases, administrative actions, and arbitrations.
RMV Enterprises v. (Case No. 1:12-CV-335) U.S. District Court for the District of Virginia (prevailed representing plaintiff in in rem cybersquatting matter).
Atkinson v. Ronald Fisher (Case No. 2:09-CV-601) U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division (represented Plaintiffs in fraud action).
The Joint Sugarhouse v. I4 Solutions (Case No. 2:16-CV-151) U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division (representing Defendants in copyright infringement action).
TruckMaster Logistics Systems v. Internet Enterprises (Case No. 2:09-CV-374) U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division (prevailed representing plaintiff in cybersquatting matter involving ).
Rinehart v. Eighty B.N. (Case No. 120700582) Utah’s Second Judicial District Court (prevailed representing plaintiff in rare state court cybersquatting case involving the Lanham Act (a federal statute)).
PrizeWise v. Oppenheimer (Case 2:07-CV-792) U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, Central Division (represented plaintiff in breach of NDA matter which was lost on summary judgment).
• Order transfering badapple.com (after settling at TRO hearing).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.