Source: http://www.childrenslegalrightsjournal.com/childrenslegalrightsjournal/volume_36_issue_1?pg=17
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 18:14:10+00:00

Document:
136Rotolo v. United States, 404 F. 2d 316, 317 (5th Cir. 1968). On appeal, the defendant argued that leading questions were allowed during the testimony of the case’s fifteen-year-old victim. Id. The Court of Appeals determined that this style of questioning was permissible due to the victim being nervous and upset at the time of questioning. Id.
138ALA. CODE § 15-25-1 (West 2015).
139CAL. EVID. CODE § 767 (West 2015) (permitting leading questions for under age ten if it complies with “the interests of justice”).
140Connecticut (CONN. GEN. STAT. ANN. § 6-8 (2015)); Delaware (DEL. R. EVID. 611); District of Columbia (D.C. R. DOM. REL. 43); Hawaii (HAW. REV. STAT. § 626-1 (West 2015)); Indiana (IND. R. EVID. 611); Iowa (IOWA R. EVID. 611); Louisiana (LA. CODE EVID. ANN. art. 611 (2015)); Maine (ME. R. EVID. 611); Michigan (MICH. R. EVID. 611); Mississippi (MISS. R. EVID. 611); Montana (MONT. R. EVID. 611); Nebraska (NEB. REV. STAT. ANN. § 27-611 (West 2015)); Nevada (NEV. REV. STAT. ANN. § 50.115 (West 2015)); North Carolina (N.C. R. EVID. 611); Oregon (OR. REV. STAT. ANN. § 40.370 (West 2015)); South Carolina (S.C. R. EVID. 611); South Dakota (S.D. CODIFIED LAWS § 19-14-20 (2015)); and Utah (UTAH R. EVID. 611).
141State v. Godsoe, 489 P.2d 4 (Ariz. 1971).

References: v. 
 § 15
 § 767
 § 6
 § 626
 art. 611
 § 27
 § 50
 § 40
 § 19
 v.