Source: https://eup.sgu.ru/en/articles/issues-turnover-of-cultural-property-as-object-of-intellectual-property
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 01:02:25+00:00

Document:
Introduction. When considering the cultural values as the object of intellectual property is revealed a number of contentious issues arising, in particular, of the shortcomings of civil-legal regulation of their turnover. Purpose. The main purpose is to identify these problems and rationale to resolve conflicts between the provisions of civil law. Results. The right to disclosure of a work in the system of copyright, implies, in particular, and the displaying of cultural values. In the legislation there is no clear definition of «image (playback) of objects of culture and cultural heritage», the question of the legality of the use of cultural values of images without obtaining permission is analyzed. Conclusion. The authors identified a conflict between the provisions of the Federal Law «On the Museum Fund of the Russian Federation and museums in the Russian Federation», establishing the obligation for all parties permission to use images of cultural values and the provisions of the Civil Code, allows free use of such images. Substantiated proposal for its elimination.
1. Bogdanova A. V. Kul’turnye tsennosti kak ob#ekt publich noi sobstvennosti [Cultural values as a public owned facility]. Publichno-pravovye issledovaniia [Publicly-legal research], 2015, no. 1, pp. 4–25.
2. Dolgov S. G. Kul’turnye tsennosti kak ob#ekty grazhdanskikh prav i ikh zaschita. Grazhdansko-pravovye i kriminalisticheskie aspekty [Cultural values as objects of civil rights and their protection. Civil-legal and forensic aspects. Cand. jur. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2000. 189 p.
3. Goloviznin A. V. Grazhdansko-pravovoe regulirovanie oborota kul’turnykh tsennostei [Civil legal regulation of traffi cking in cultural property. Cand. jur. sci. diss.]. Ekaterinburg, 2006. 226 p.
4. Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii (chast’ chetvertaia) ot 18 dekabria 2006 g. № 230-FZ (v red. ot 30 dekabria 2015 g.) [The Civil Code of the Russian Federation (Part Four) of 18 December 2006 (an edition of 30.12.2015)]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2006, no. 52 (pt. I), art. 5496; 2016 (pt. I), no. 1, art. 51.
5. Osnovy zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii o kul’ture (utv. VS RF 9 oktiabria 1992 g. № 3612-1) (v red. ot 28 noiabria 2015 g.) [Basics of the Russian Federation legislation on culture from 9 October 1992 № 3612-1, (an edition of 28 November 2015]. Vedomosti Soveta narodnykh deputatov i Verkhovnogo Soveta Rossiiskoi Federatsii [Statements of Council of People’s Deputies and the Supreme Council of Russia, 1992. no. 46, art. 2615]; Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 2015, no. 48 (pt. 1), art. 6723.
6. Russkii muzei [Russian Museum. Site]. Available at: http://rusmuseum.ru/shop/ (accessed 12 May 2016).
7. Gavrilov E. O «muzeinom prave» [About «museum law»]. Khoziaistvo i pravo [Economy and law], 2015, no. 3, pp. 71–81.
8. O Muzeinom fonde Rossiiskoi Federatsii i muzeiakh v Rossiiskoi Federatsii: federal’nyi zakon ot 26.05.1996 № 54-FZ (red. ot 01.12.2014) [On the Museum Fund of the Russian Federation and museums in the Russian Federation. Federal law of 26.05.1996 № 54-FZ (an edition of 01.12.2014]. Sobranie zakonodatel’stva RF [Collection of Laws of the Russian Federation], 1996, no. 22 (pt. 1), art. 2591; 2014, no. 49 (pt. VI), art. 6928.
9. Postanovlenie Suda po intellektual’nym pravam ot 20.06.2014 № С01-538/2014 po delu № А40-28447/2013 (The Decision of the Court for intellectual property rights of 20.06.2014 № С01-538/2014 the case № А40- 28447/2013). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource].
10. Postanovlenie Suda po intellektual’nym pravam ot 26.09.2013 № С01-65/2013 po delu № А63-18468/2012 (The Decision of the Court for intellectual property rights of 20.06.2014 № С01-65/2013 the case № А63- 18468/2012). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource].
11. Postanovlenie Federal’nogo arbitrazhnogo suda po Moskovskomu okrugu ot 25.01.2013 po delu № А40- 45748/12-27-419 (The Decision of the Federal Arbitration Court of Moscow District of 25.01.2013 the case № А40-45748/12-27-419). ATP «Consultant» [electronic resource].

References: V. 
 V. 
 art. 5496
 art. 51
 art. 2615
 art. 6723
 art. 2591
 art. 6928