Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/060705.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 14:28:04+00:00

Document:
MERGE TECHNOLOGIES: Faces Putative Securities Lawsuits in Wis.
XM SATELLITE: Schatz & Nobel Files Securities Fraud Suit in D.C.
between Jan. 1, 2000 and the present.
fuel, security and insurance surcharges in air cargo shipping.
freight via air on behalf of themselves or others.
in 2003, and for other external costs.
the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914, 15 U.S.C. Section 15.
from potentially all parts of the globe.
ADS, et al., Case No. 1:06-cv-00325-HHK," filed in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia under Judge Henry H.
4600, Fax: (202) 408-4699, E-mail: mhausfeld@cmht.com.
Milstein, is working with the firm to direct potential U.K.
that there could be causes for litigation in the U.K. as well.
York (Class Action Reporter, June 28, 2006).
co-ordinate fuel-price surcharges on key transatlantic routes.
flights in and out of London.
routes, including the setting of fuel surcharges.
The suit is "Gornik v. British Airways PLC, et al., Case No.
referral to Judge Viktor V. Pohorelsky.
and (888) 347-4600, E-mail: lnussbaum@cmht.com.
overcharging customers, and secretly keeping the difference.
Judge Matoesian's decision to stay the suit pending arbitration.
was filed in 2002 in County Circuit Court.
Thomas G. Maag is now connected with Wendler & Ezra, P.C.
Collinsville, Illinois (Madison & St. Clair Cos.).
wiretapping, the Atlanta Business Chronicle reports.
program to collect phone call data from millions of Americans.
to provide bulk calling records to that database."
(Class Action Reporter, Feb. 2, 2006).
requirements of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard No. 108.
a vehicle crash without warning.
For more information, contact Autoxtyle at 813-842-8278.
and the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. Section 1981a.
spirits and beer, and are now consolidated as "Eisenberg v.
Anheuser-Busch, Case No. No. 1:04cv1081," pending in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Northern Ohio.
presumably on the same facts and legal theories.
fraudulently concealed their alleged misconduct.
successful, represents significant financial exposure.
Commission for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2006.
sawmill in 2001, according to The Pictorial.
Workers of Canada lawsuit launched in 2001 against the B.C.
enough money by Wednesday we'll still go ahead," Mr. James said.
timber while shutting down the mill.
control, increasing the risk of a crash.
if necessary, replacement of the steering intermediate shaft.
Commission for the period ended March 31, 2006.
against the company and several of its former affiliates.
here over acts committed abroad.
the U.S. Torture Victim Protection Act, among others.
illicit coca, marijuana, and poppy crops.
livestock, and displacing thousands of small farmers.
to be apportioned between the other defendants and the company.
Washington under Judge Richard W. Roberts.
over a $30 courier fee, The Madison St. Clair Record reports.
said plaintiff's argument was weak by writing.
regulatory approval for its medical device Mucotrol(TM).
-- Mat eVentures v. Kotha Sekharam and GeoPharma, Inc.
company's securities during the class period.
plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint.
On June 6, 2005 defendants filed a motion to dismiss the action.
action, this time with prejudice.
682-7474, Fax: (212) 687-2329, E-mail: rscher@foley.com.
rooms, the Clayton News Daily-Online reports.
online companies like Expedia.com, Travelocity.com and others.
at a profit to online bookers.
the price they quote online.
but he expects the trial to begin in January.
Action Reporter, June 8, 2006).
matter related to the case, the Gwinnett Daily Post reports.
his house and make other living arrangements.
Judge Batchelor said that Sumrak's case was a "moot point."
Constitution as well as the U.S. Constitution.
For more information on the Gwinnett suit, contact C.J. "Jack"
for the District of Kansas, and Tanya Sue Wilson, Assistant U.S.
Attorney from the same district.
Federal Savings & Loan at the applicable note rate.
Education Act of 1965, as amended, 20 U.S.C Section 1071 et.
seq. (34 C.F.R. Part 682).
on the loan. The borrower defaulted on the obligation on Aug.
7, 1994, and the holder filed a claim on the guarantee.
she is wholly in default.
plaintiff is entitled to recovery on the promissory note.
and has made demand for said amount.
the date of judgment at the legal rate set forth in 28 U.S.C.
Section 1961 until paid, plus filing fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Education Act of 1965, as amended 20 U.S.C. Section 1071 et.
The holder demanded payment according to the terms of the note.
guarantor attempted to collect the debt from the borrower.
entitled to recovery on the promissory note.
legal rate set forth in 28 U.S.C. Section 1961 until paid.
cent until the date of judgment, plus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
Representing the plaintiff is Tanya S. Wilson, Office of U.S.
could file it at Hennepin County courthouse in Minneapolis.
the most convenient forum for all of the parties."
Mitchell, a Chicago attorney, already died this year.
stock between Aug. 2, 2005 and March 16, 2006.
co-chief executive officer of the company.
operations for the fiscal quarters ended June 30, 2005 and Sept.
but the court has not yet ruled on them.
alleging that members of the company's Board of Directors, Mr.
directors is considering its response to this demand.
(1) "Maiden v. Merge Technologies Inc et al., Case No.
2:06-cv-00349-RTR," on behalf of Rosalind Maiden.
(2) "Stahl v. Merge Technologies Inc et al., Case No.
2:06-cv-00356-RTR," on behalf of Howard A Stahl.
(4) "Brotman v. Merge Technologies Inc et al., Case No.
2:06-cv-00431-RTR," on behalf of Carl Brotman.
(5) "Smith et al v. Merge Technologies Inc et al., Case No.
2:06-cv-00483-RTR Rudolph," on behalf of Glynn D Smith.
(6) "Derzay v. Merge Technologies Inc et al., Case No.
2:06-cv-00493-RTR," on behalf of John E Derzay.
gademi@ademilaw.com (filed April 17, 2006).
Networks Corp., according to the Toronto Star.
settlement process, the report said.
provinces of Ontario, Quebec and British Columbia in Canada.
of U.S. federal and Canadian provincial securities laws.
approximately $2.4 billion in cash and Nortel common stock.
2000 through Feb. 15, 2001.
company's current equity (approximately 628 million shares).
the date of the notice mailing to file their claims.
active assistance of Judge Sweet.
after notice to the Nortel II class.
counsel at Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP.
Parties in the 11 putative class actions pending in the U.S.
complaints until a consolidated complaint was filed.
by the company to defend it against theses suits.
company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer.
Entitled, "Mould v. PainCare Holdings, Inc., et al., Case No.
restate certain past financial statements.
from Aug. 27, 2002 to March 15, 2006.
same court, which recite similar allegations.
The suit is "Mould v. Paincare Holdings, Inc. et al., Case No.
Phone: 305/358-3500, Fax: 305/347-6500, E-mail: bberman@mwe.com.
25,000 units of Porter-Cable Cordless Brad Nailer.
unit. "Porter+Cable" is printed on the nailer's motor housing.
2001 through December 2005 for between $230 and $280.
visit the firm's Website: http://www.Porter-cable.com.
for violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act.
vested in the Plan pursuant to ERISA.
against Qwest Communications International, Inc. in the U.S.
financial condition to reap profits in stock sales.
upon retirement, as of the end of 2003.
accrual provisions, ERISA Sections 203 and 204, 29 U.S.C.
The suit is "Rathbun v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.
et al., Case No. 1:05-cv-00711-LTB-MJW," filed in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Colorado under Judge Lewis T.
Babcock, with referral to Judge Michael J. Watanabe.
work after retiring, according to Associated Press.
interest to retirees who signed up for the program before Jul.
August when the court grated class action status to the case.
state retirees in the program.
efforts to dissolve the 137-year old hospital system.
received lump-sum payments totaling about $60 million.
Courthouse with Judge Kenneth G. Goode.
discount from health-care facilities as insurance companies.
figures, which posed a choking and aspiration hazard to babies.
2004. The company stopped selling the product in March 2004.
animal figure that fell off of the teether rattle.
for $150 each, in February 2005.
through Friday, or visit http://www.tiffany.com.
its Farm Teether Rattles in a timely manner.
for the borough's Emergency Response Team.
Zylon body armor are prone to failure.
Zylon is sold under the trade names ULTIMA, ULTIMAX and TRIFLEX.
named as defendant in the suit is Toyobo America, Inc.
proceeds, the settlement required claimants to register by Sept.
being accepted through July 1, 2006.
theft of the personal information to law enforcers.
law office of Andrew S. Kierstead in Portland.
disability ratings, and certain medical information.
the District of the District of Columbia under Judge Emmet G.
A similar suit, "Vietnam Veterans of America, Inc. et al. v.
-- Vietnam Veterans Of America, Inc.
Representing the plaintiffs in the Kennedy suit is Douglas J.
stolen, according to Associated Press.
approved $160 million to pay for the credit monitoring.
in any future litigation against the department.
Court over patient records, Tribune Chronicle reports.
patients on behalf of 12,000 hospital users.
through federal Supplemental Security Income benefits.
but it later settled the case in December 2003.
firm or its insurance carrier.
General Hospital Association, a non-profit holding company.
was more sensitive, were given between $750 and $1,500.
In addition, a $25,000 incentive award was given to Ms. Biddle.
residents affected by the accident, according to WCPO.com.
after being parked along the tracks for about nine months.
and the shipping company that sent the chemical.
details of the agreement were not revealed.
to be sent out as early as July 12, 2006.
employees who lost wages during the evacuation, the report said.
Keating Muething and Klekamp: http://www.shselegal.com/.
stock and other securities UnitedHealth Group, Inc. between Dec.
announced that the company had received an inquiry from the U.S.
company's current and historic stock option grant practices.
April 6, 2006, to close, on April 11, 2006, at $51.55.
company's practices of granting stock options.
2.1 percent, to close, on May 23, 2006, at $42.82 per share.
For more details, contact Marc L. Ackerman, Esq. or Evan J.
28, 2005 and May 24, 2006, inclusive.
its goal of 9 million subscribers by year-end 2006.
successful in lowering its subscriber acquisition costs.
levels and that it would not meet its subscriber guidance.
sales of their personal holdings.
subscriber guidance for 2006 from 9 million to 8.5 million.
close at $13.75 per share.
the Court for appointment as lead plaintiff of the class.

References: v. 
 V. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.