Source: https://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=EGMR&Datum=12.10.2017&Aktenzeichen=46852%2F13
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 11:13:13+00:00

Document:
46852/13 et al., § 159 in fine, 12 October 2017; Sargsyan v. Azerbaijan (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 40167/06, § 32, 12 December 2017; and Chiragov and Others v. Armenia (just satisfaction) [GC], no. 13216/05, § 50, 12 December 2017).
46852/13 et al, § 202, ECHR 2017 (extracts)).
While the compliance of the improved compensatory mechanism with the Convention requirements will be examined by the Court below (see paragraphs 103-115), the Court is bound to observe that the situation in the present group of Russian post-pilot cases is visibly different - both from the standpoint of the progress achieved at domestic level (see paragraphs 84 and 94 above) and the caseload - from the recent case of Burmych and Others v. Ukraine ([GC], nos. 46852/13 and 4 others, §§ 182-84, 12 October 2017), in which the Grand Chamber concluded that the pilot judgment in Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine (no. 40450/04, 15 October 2009) dealing with repetitive non-enforcement cases lodged against Ukraine had "clearly not succeeded in achieving its aims" (contrast Burmych and Others, cited above, §§ 43, 146-47 and 182-84).
En définitive, vu l'importance du principe de subsidiarité (voir, notamment, Burmych et autres c. Ukraine (radiation) [GC], nos 46852/13 et al, § 218, 12 octobre 2017), la Cour estime que, faute d'avoir saisi les juridictions administratives d'un recours en annulation pour excès de pouvoir de la décision du CHU de Toulouse du 15 décembre 2014, 1es requérantes n'ont pas épuisé les voies de recours internes, au sens de l'article 35 § 1 de la Convention.
After adopting the pilot-judgment procedure the respondent State is subsequently required to eliminate the source of the violation for the future and provide a remedy for the past prejudice suffered by both the applicants in the pilot case and all other victims of the same type of violation (see Burmych and Others v. Ukraine [GC], nos. 46852/13 et al., § 161, ECHR 2017).
46852/13 et al, § 221, 12 October 2017), i.e. struck out and transmitted to the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in order for it to be dealt with in the framework of the general measures of execution of the pilot judgment in the case of Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine (no. 40450/04, 15 October 2009).

References: § 159
in fine
 v. 
 § 32
 v. 
 § 50
 § 202
 v. 
 v. 
 § 218
 § 1
 v. 
 § 161
 § 221
 v.