Source: http://www.whxb.pku.edu.cn/EN/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201711021
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 02:19:16+00:00

Document:
Quantitative correlation of several theoretical electrophilicity measures over different families of organic compounds are examined relative to the experimental values of Mayr et al. Notably, the ability to predict these values accurately will help to elucidate the reactivity and selectivity trends observed in charge-transfer reactions. A crucial advantage of this theoretical approach is that it provides this information without the need of experiments, which are often demanding and time-consuming. Here, two different types of electrophilicity measures were analyzed. First, models derived from conceptual density functional theory (c-DFT), including Parr's original proposal and further generalizations of this index, are investigated. For instance, the approaches of Gázquez et al. and Chamorro et al. are considered, whereby it is possible to distinguish between processes in which a molecule gains or loses electrons. Further, we also explored two novel electrophilicity definitions. On one hand, the potential of environmental perturbations to affect electron incorporation into a system is analyzed in terms of recent developments in c-DFT. These studies highlight the importance of considering the molecular surroundings when a consistent description of chemical reactivity is needed. On the other hand, we test a new definition of electrophilicity that is free from inconsistencies (so-called thermodynamic electrophilicity). This approach is based on Parr's pioneering insights, though it corrects issues present in the standard working expression for the calculation of electrophilicity. Additionally, we use machine-learning tools (i.e., symbolic regression) to identify the models that best fit the experimental values. In this way, the best possible description of the electrophilicity values in terms of different electronic structure quantities is obtained. Overall, this straightforward approach enables one to obtain good correlations between the theoretical and experimental quantities by using the simple, yet powerful, interpretative advantage of c-DFT methods. In general, we observed that the correlations found at the HF/6-31G(d) level of theory are of semi-quantitative value. To obtain more accurate results, we showed that working with families of compounds with similar functional groups is indispensable.
Martínez GONZÁLEZ Marco,Carlos CÁRDENAS,Juan I. RODRÍGUEZ,Shubin LIU,Farnaz HEIDAR-ZADEH,Ramón Alain MIRANDA-QUINTANA,Paul W. AYERS. Quantitative Electrophilicity Measures[J].Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2018, 34(6): 662-674.
1 Miller B. Advanced Organic Chemistry: Reactions and Mechanisms; Prentice-Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA 1998.
2 March J. Advanced Organic Chemistry; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA 1992.
3 Mayr H. ; Kempf B. ; Ofial A. R. Acc. Chem. Res. 2003, 36, 66.
4 Mayr H. ; Bug T. ; Gotta M. F. ; Hering N. ; Irrgang B. ; Janker B. ; Kempf B. ; Loos R. ; Ofial A. R. ; Remennikov G. ; et al J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 9500.
5 Mayr H. ; Patz M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1994, 33, 938.
6 Mayr H. ; Ofial A. R. J. Phys. Org. Chem. 2008, 21, 584.
7 Mayr H. ; Ofial A. R. Pure Appl. Chem. 2005, 77, 1807.
8 Liu S. B. .In Chemical Reactivity Theory: A Density Functional View; Chattaraj P. K..., Ed.; Taylor and Francis: Boca Raton, FL, USA 2009, p. 179.
9 Chattaraj P. K. ; Giri S. Ann. Rep. Prog. Chem. C 2009, 105, 13.
10 Chattaraj P. K. ; Giri S. ; Duley S. Chem. Rev. 2011, 111, PR43..
11 Maynard A. T. ; Huang M. ; Rice W. G. ; Covell D. G. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 11578.
12 Parr R. G. ; von Szentpály L. ; Liu S. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 1922.
13 Chermette H. J. Comput. Chem. 1999, 20, 129.
14 Parr R. G. ; Yang W. Density-Functional Theory of Atoms and Molecules; Oxford UP: New York, NY, USA 1989.
15 Geerlings P. ; De Proft F. ; Langenaeker W. Chem. Rev. 2003, 103, 1793.
16 Johnson P. A. ; Bartolotti L. J. ; Ayers P. W. ; Fievez T. ; Geerlings P. Modern Charge Density Analysis; Gatti C..., Macchi P..., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA 2012, p. 715.
17 Ayers P. W. ; Anderson J. S. M. ; Bartolotti L. J. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2005, 101, 520.
18 Ayers P. W. ; Parr R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 2010.
20 Chemical eactivity Theory: A Density Functional View ; Chattaraj P. K. Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA 2009.
21 Fuentealba P. ; Cárdenas C. .Chemical Modelling; Springborg M..., Ed.; The Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK 2015, Vol. 11, p. 151..
22 Liu S. B. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2009, 25, 590.
23 Gazquez J. L. J. Mex. Chem. Soc. 2008, 52, 3.
24 Domingo L. R. ; Perez P. ; Saez J. A. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 1486.
25 Domingo L. R. ; Zaragoza R. J. ; Saez J. A. ; Arno M. Molecules 2012, 17, 1335.
26 Domingo L. R. ; Perez P. ; Contreras R. Tetrahedron 2004, 60, 6585.
27 Domingo L. R. ; Aurell M. J. ; Perez P. ; Contreras R. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 6871.
28 Anderson J. S. M. ; Liu Y. L. ; Thomson J. W. ; Ayers P. W. J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 2010, 943, 168.
29 Ayers P. W. ; Anderson J. S. M. ; Rodriguez J. I. ; Jawed Z. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2005, 7, 1918.
30 Chamorro E. ; Chattaraj P. K. ; Fuentealba P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 7068.
31 Parthasarathi R. ; Elango M. ; Subramanian V. ; Chattaraj P. K. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2005, 113, 257.
32 González M. M. ; Hernández-Castillo D. ; Montero-Cabrera L. A. ; Miranda-Quintana R. A. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2017, e25444.
33 Moens J. ; Jaque P. ; De Proft F. ; Geerlings P. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 6023.
34 Moens J. ; Geerlings P. ; Roos G. Chem. -A Eur. J. 2007, 13, 8174.
35 Moens J. ; Roos G. ; Jaque P. ; Proft F. ; Geerlings P. Chem. -A Eur. J. 2007, 13, 9331.
36 Parthasarathi R. ; Padmanabhan J. ; Subramanian V. ; Maiti B. ; Chattaraj P. K. Curr. Sci. 2004, 86, 535.
37 Parthasarathi R. ; Subramanian V. ; Roy D. R. ; Chattaraj P. K. Biorg. Med. Chem. 2004, 12, 5533.
38 Rétey J. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2003, 1647, 179.
39 Rosenkranz H. S. ; Klopman G. ; Zhang Y. ; Graham C. ; Karol M. H. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 129.
40 Miranda-Quintana R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146, 046101.
41 Pan S. ; Sola M. ; Chattaraj P. K. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117, 1843.
42 Morell C. ; Labet V. ; Grand A. ; Chermette H. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2009, 11, 3414.
43 Chattaraj P. K. Indian J. Phys. Proc. Indian Assoc. Cultiv. Sci. 2007, 81, 871.
44 Miranda-Quintana R. A. ; Chattaraj P. K. ; Ayers P. W. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 124103.
45 Gazquez J. L. ; Cedillo A. ; Vela A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 1966.
46 Chamorro E. ; Duque-Nore?a M. ; Perez P. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 896, 73.
47 Chamorro E. ; Duque-Nore?a M. ; Perez P. J. Mol. Struct. 2009, 901, 145.
48 Franco-Pérez M. ; Gazquez J. L. ; Ayers P. W. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin. 2018, submitted.
49 Miranda-Quintana R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 146, 214113.
50 Parr R. G. ; Pearson R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 7512.
51 Parr R. G. ; Donnelly R. A. ; Levy M. ; Palke W. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 68, 3801.
52 Sanderson R. T. Science 1951, 114, 670.
53 Galvan M. ; Vela A. ; Gazquez J. L. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 6470.
54 Vargas R. ; Galvan M. ; Vela A. J. Phys. Chem. A 1998, 102, 3134.
55 Galvan M. ; Vargas R. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 1625.
56 Ghanty T. K. ; Ghosh S. K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994, 116, 3943.
57 Chamorro E. ; Santos J. C. ; Escobar C. A. ; Perez P. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 431, 210.
58 Chamorro E. ; Perez P. ; De Proft F. ; Geerlings P. J. Chem. Phys. 2006, 124, 044105.
59 Perez P. ; Chamorro E. ; Ayers P. W. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 204108.
60 Miranda-Quintana R. A. ; Ayers P. W. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2016, 135, 239.
61 Cardenas C. ; Heidar Zadeh F. ; Ayers P. W. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 25721.
62 Perdew J. P. ; Parr R. G. ; Levy M. ; Balduz J. L. , Jr. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982, 49, 1691.
63 Heidar Zadeh F. ; Miranda-Quintana R. A. ; Verstraelen T. ; Bultinck P. ; Ayers P. W. J. Chem. Theory Comp. 2016, 12, 5777.
64 Miranda-Quintana R. A. ; Ayers P. W. Conceptual Density Functional Theory and Its Applications in the Chemical Domain; Islam N..., Kaya S..., Eds.; Apple Academic Press: NJ, USA, in press.
65 Miranda-Quintana R. A. ; Ayers P. W. J. Chem. Phys. 2016, 144, 244112.
66 Ayers P. W. ; Parr R. G. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 054111.
67 Ayers P. W. ; Parr R. G. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 184108.
68 Franco-Pérez M. ; Ayers P. W. ; Gazquez J. L. ; Vela A. J. Chem. Phys. 2017, 147, 094105.
69 Franco-Pérez M. ; Heidar-Zadeh F. ; Ayers P. W. ; Gazquez J. L. ; Vela A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 11588.
70 Franco-Pérez M. ; Ayers P. W. ; Gazquez J. L. ; Vela A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 13687.
71 Polanco-Ramírez C. A. ; Franco-Pérez M. ; Carmona-Espíndola J. ; Gazquez J. L. ; Ayers P. W. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2017, 19, 12355.
72 Franco-Pérez M. ; Ayers P. ; Gazquez J. L. ; Vela A. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 244117.
73 Franco-Pérez M. ; Gazquez J. L. ; Ayers P. ; Vela A. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 143, 154103.
74 Malek A. ; Balawender R. J. Chem. Phys. 2015, 142, 054104.
75 Miranda-Quintana R. A. ; Ayers P. W. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 15070.
76 Miranda-Quintana R. A. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2017, 136, 76.
77 Miranda-Quintana R. A. ; Ayers P. W. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2016, 135, 172.
78 Miranda-Quintana R. A. Theor. Chem. Acc. 2016, 135, 189.
79 Miranda-Quintana R. A. ; González M. M. ; Ayers P. W. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 22235.
80 Klopman G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 223.
81 Klopman G. ; Hudson R. F. Theor. Chim. Act. 1967, 8, 165.
82 Klopman G. ; Klopman G. Chemical Reactivity and Reaction Paths; Wiley-Interscience: New York, NY, USA 1974, p. 55.
83 Hudson R. F. ; Klopman G. Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 12, 1103.
84 Salem L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 553.
85 Salem L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 543.
86 Salem L. Chem. Br. 1969, 5, 449.
87 Witten I. H. ; Frank E. ; Hall M. A. ; Pal C. J. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques, 4th ed.; Elsevier: Cambridge, MA, USA 2017.
88 Gertrudes J. C. ; Maltarollo V. G. ; Silva R. A. ; Oliveira P. R. ; Honorio K. M. ; da Silva A. B. F. Curr. Med. Chem. 2012, 19, 4289.
89 Carrera G. ; Gupta S. ; Aires-de-Sousa J. J. Comput. Aided Mol. Des. 2009, 23, 419.
90 Dietterich T. G. Ai Mag. 1997, 18, 97.
91 Carbonell J. G. ; Michalski R. S. ; Mitchell T. M. Machine Learning: an Artificial Intelligence Approach; Michalski R. S..., Carbonell J. G..., Mitchell T. M..., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany 1983, p. 3.
92 Lino A. ; Rocha A. ; Sizo A. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 2016, 31, 2061.
93 Affenzeller M. ; Winkler S. M. ; Kronberger G. ; Kommenda M. ; Burlacu B. ; Wagner S. Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XI; Riolo R..., Moore J. H..., Kotanchek M..., Eds.; Springer New York: New York, NY, USA 2014, p. 175.
94 Billard L. ; Diday E. Classification, Clustering, and Data Analysis: Recent Advances and Applications; Jajuga, K., Sokolowski, A., Bock, H. H., Eds.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany 2012.
95 Billard L. ; Diday E. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 2003, 98, 470.
96 Billard L. ; Diday E. Data Analysis, Classification, and Related Methods; Kiers, H. A. L., Rasson, J.-P., Groenen, P. J. F., Schader, M., Eds.; Springer Berlin Heidelberg: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany 2000, p. 369.
97 Schmidt M. D. ; Vallabhajosyula R. R. ; Jenkins J. W. ; Hood J. E. ; Soni A. S. ; Wikswo J. P. ; Lipson H. Phys. Biol. 2011, 8, 055011.
98 Schmidt M. W. ; Lipson H. Science 2009, 324, 81.
99 Bongard J. ; Lipson H. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 9943.
100 Quade M. ; Abel M. ; Shafi K. ; Niven R. K. Phys. Rev. B 2016, 94, 012214.
101 Koza J. R. 2nd International IEEE Conference on Tools for Artificial Intelligence 1990, p. 819.
102 Sharma S. ; Tambe S. S. Biochem. Eng. J. 2014, 85, 89.
103 Langdon W. B. ; Poli R. Found. Genet. Program.; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany 2013.
104 O'Neil M. ; Ryan C. Grammatical Evolution: Evolutionary Automatic Programming in an Arbitrary Language; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA 2003, p. 33.
105 O'Neil M. ; Ryan C. Grammatical Evolution: Evolutionary Automatic Programming in an Arbitrary Language; Springer US: Boston, MA, USA 2003, p. 79.
106 Ryan C. ; Collins J. ; Neill M. O. Genetic Programming: First European Workshop, EuroGP'98 Paris, France, April 14–15 1998, p. 83.
107 Luke S. ; Spector L. Genetic Programming 1997: Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference (GP97); Koza, J., Ed.; San Francisco, CA, USA 1997, p. 240.
108 Spears W. M. ; Anand V. Methodologies for Intelligent Systems: 6th International Symposium, ISMIS '91 Charlotte, N. C., USA, October 16–19, 1991 Proceedings; Ras, Z. W., Zemankova, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany 1991, p. 409.
109 Chomsky N. IRE Trans. Inf. Theory 1956, 2, 113.
110 Ginsburg S. The Mathematical Theory of Context Free Languages; McGraw-Hill, New York, NY, USA 1966.
111 Temkin J. M. ; Gilder M. R. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 2046.
112 Trelea I. C. Inf. Proc. Lett. 2003, 85, 317.
113 Mayr H. http://www.cup.lmu.de/oc/mayr/reaktionsdatenbank/; Vol. 2017, accessed Oct 30, 2017.
114 Mayr H. http://www.cup.uni-muenchen.de/oc/mayr/DBintro.html; Vol.2017, accessed Oct 30, 2017.
115 Frisch M. J. ; Trucks G. W. ; Schlegel H. B. ; Scuseria G. E. ; Robb M. A. ; Cheeseman J. R. ; Scalmani G. ; Barone V. ; Mennucci B. ; Petersson G. A. ; et al Gaussian 09; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, USA 2009.
116 Wagner S. ; Kronberger G. ; Beham A. ; Kommenda M. ; Scheibenpflug A. ; Pitzer E. ; Vonolfen S. ; Kofler M. ; Winkler S. ; Dorfer V. ; et al Advanced Methods and Applications in Computational Intelligence; Klempous R. Nikodem J..., Jacak W..., Chaczko Z..., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Heidelberg, Germany 2014, p. 197.
117 Yang W. T. ; Mortier W. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5708.
118 Miranda-Quintana R. A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2016, 658, 328.
119 Zielinski F. ; Tognetti V. ; Joubert L. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2012, 527, 67.
120 Bultinck P. ; Fias S. ; Alsenoy C. V. ; Ayers P. W. ; Carbó-Dorca R. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 127, 034102.
 ZHOU Xia-Yu, RONG Chun-Ying, LU Tian, LIU Shu-Bin. Hirshfeld Charge as a Quantitative Measure of Electrophilicity and Nucleophilicity: Nitrogen-Containing Systems [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2014, 30(11): 2055-2062.
 ZHONG Ai-Guo, HUANG Ling, JIANG Hua-Jiang. Structure, Spectroscopy and Reactivity of H2S Bonding to Metal(II) Porphyrins [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2011, 27(04): 837-845.
 WANG Xiao-Wei, JIANG Gang, DU Ji-Guang. Structures, Infrared Spectra and Reactivities of (+)-Catechin Metal Complexes [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2011, 27(02): 309-314.
 LIU Shu-Bin. Conceptual Density Functional Theory and Some Recent Developments [J]. Acta Phys. -Chim. Sin., 2009, 25(03): 590-600.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.