Source: https://www.criminallegalnews.org/cln-litigation/2016/CA/prison-legal-news-v-sacramento-co-jones-ca-complaint-censorship-2011/
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 22:36:24+00:00

Document:
22 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO; SCOTT R.
AND DAMAGES - CASE NO.
12 California Civil Code § 52.1, and seeks injunctive and declaratory relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
13 § 1983. Plaintiff also seeks damages to be proven at trial.
19 Plaintiff’s state claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
22 Defendants reside in this District.
2 under the laws of the State of California.
8 policy governing mail for prisoners. He is sued in his individual and official capacities.
16 sells books about the criminal justice system and legal issues affecting prisoners.
20 prisoners, attorneys, journalists, public libraries, judges, and other members of the public.
2 Book List; and (3) The Educational Courses Brochure.
16 health crisis in U.S. prisons and jails.
21 and habeas corpus litigation.
6 both of the “No Staples” or “No Stickers/Labels” boxes on the RTS stamp.
11 occasions from April 2010 to the present.
17 prisoners at the Jail.
19 News, and frustrated PLN’s attempt to deliver the May 2010 issue to four prisoners at the Jail.
22 corresponding monthly issues to five prisoners at the Jail.
3 prisoners at the Jail.
8 frustrated PLN’s attempt to deliver it by First Class Mail to six prisoners at the Jail.
11 them by First Class Mail to two prisoners at the Jail.
14 prisoners at the Jail.
25 frustrated PLN’s attempt to deliver it by First Class Mail to twelve prisoners at the Jail.
5 frustrated PLN’s attempt to deliver it by First Class Mail to one prisoner at the Jail.
7 decisions in any of the aforementioned instances.
11 and expression directed at prisoners confined there.
15 to appeal the Jail’s censorship decisions.
18 violates Plaintiff’s First Amendment rights.
23 protection under the law.
4 lost opportunities for book sales.
6 committed with reckless and callous indifference to Plaintiff’s rights.
10 injured and continues to injure the Plaintiff, or ratified or adopted them.
12 continue to violate Plaintiff’s rights, and as such Plaintiff has no adequate remedy at law.
16 censoring mail without due process of law.
18 on or about April 5, 2011. Plaintiff has not yet received a response to its tort claims filing.
25 damages to Plaintiff, and will continue to cause damage.
5 retaliation for exercising its constitutionally protected speech rights.
8 caused damages to Plaintiff, and will continue to cause damage.
the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution through 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
4 the United States Constitution through 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
13 California Civil Code Section 52.
22 continue to cause damage.
24 relief against all Defendants.
5 will continue to cause damage.
7 relief against all Defendants.
14 Constitution and have caused damage to Plaintiff, and will continue to cause damage.
16 relief against all Defendants.
20 appropriate at this time so that all parties may know their respective rights and act accordingly.
24 California Constitution, and California Civil Code Section 52.1.
28 of the California Constitution, and California Civil Code Section 52.1.
8 of Civil Procedure § 1021.5.

References: § 52
 § 1983
 § 1367
 § 1983
 § 1983
 § 1021