Source: http://www.legalgist.com/martin-trice-case
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 02:40:14+00:00

Document:
Q: What is the Martin v. Trice case about?
Wife is suing for loss of consortium for her husband’s injuries, and now wants to add her own personal injuries as a claim. This is TN case. We have the discovery rule in TN which says the SOL doesn’t start running until the plaintiff knows or should have known of the injury. Test for TN is whether the amendment raises a new cause of action and not related back (v. Fed rules). This passes the federal test for amendment, but not TN’s because TN said this was a new cause of action. You have to pass both tests in order to get the amendment.
What's Your Answer to "What is the Martin v. Trice case about?"
We have located some similar legal questions and legal question categories. Check out these challenging questions that askquestions about Civil Procedure Cases and are similar to What is the Martin v. Trice case about?. Also, we have included a list of some of our more popular legal question categories. These categories are based on what everyone is asking and answering.
What are the 2 components of Causation requirement as reflected in the Warth v. Seldin case?
What happened in the case Hernandez v. Nueces County Medical Society Community Blood Bank?
What happened in the case of Probate v. construction?
What are the Experiments & Demos that 403/104b analyses?
How does Dave give his view on the Bad Tendency” test v.“Clear and Present Danger”test?
What is the Test for Plaintiff standing?
Are there any differences between the Bad Tendency” test v.“Clear and Present Danger”test?
Describe the case of Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966).
What was Justice Souter’s dissent in the Dolan v. Tigard (1994) case?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.