Source: https://disputesoft.com/
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 09:04:49+00:00

Document:
DisputeSoft was engaged as a consulting and testifying expert in March 2013 by the California State Controller’s Office (SCO) in the matter of California State Controller’s Office v. SAP Public Services, Inc. The SCO alleged that SAP had breached a software implementation contract as well as the covenant of good faith and fair dealing in connection with the implementation of a new human resources and payroll system for approximately 240,000 California state employees.
DisputeSoft was engaged by the County of Orange in the matter of County of Orange v. Tata Consultancy Services, a software failure case involving the failed implementation of a new property tax management system for the County. The County alleged that TCS breached its software implementation contract and fraudulently misrepresented the extent to which work was completed in order to extend the term and cost of the project.
DisputeSoft was engaged as a consulting expert in the matter of Apple v. HTC, a patent infringement dispute between two major smartphone manufacturers. DisputeSoft assisted HTC in finding evidence to support its contentions of invalidity, non-infringement, and lack of domestic industry through source-code review, claims charting, and prior-art research.
ConnectU LLC v. Mark Zuckerberg and The Facebook, Inc. in United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts was a copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation involving the social networking website.
DisputeSoft was retained to provide consulting services and testimony on behalf of BearingPoint, Inc., in the matter of BearingPoint, Inc. v. United States Department of the Interior. At issue was whether BearingPoint’s contract was terminated by the government for convenience or for breach of contract.
DisputeSoft was retained as a testifying expert for the defendant in the matter of InDyne, Inc. v. Abacus Technology Corp., a copyright infringement and trade secret misappropriation dispute between Abacus, an incoming NASA contractor, and InDyne, an outgoing NASA contractor concerning allegedly stolen software.
DisputeSoft was engaged by Blue Line Media, Inc. to consult and testify in the matter of Blue Line Media, Inc. v. Redmon Group, Inc. Blue Line Media engaged Redmon Group to develop a law enforcement job posting website and brought suit in the Circuit Court of the City of Alexandria, Virginia over Redmon’s failure to complete the project.
DisputeSoft’s team of professionals provides litigation consulting and expert testimony services to clients nationally and internationally. We specialize in information technology-related disputes involving software project failure, copyright infringement, trade secret misappropriation, and patent infringement. E-discovery and computer forensics are core disciplines used to support these substantive practice areas.
We apply our considerable years of IT experience to investigating, analyzing and reporting on findings and opinions to cost effectively aid clients involved in complex software disputes. If you are in need of a software failure expert, a software intellectual property expert, or a computer forensics expert, we invite you to consider DisputeSoft.
DisputeSoft was founded by Jeff Parmet, who has been designated as an expert on more than 100 software disputes, and is listed in Best Lawyers Preferred sm which only lists experts recommended by lawyers listed in The Best Lawyers in America ®.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.