Source: http://cryptome.org/dvd-mpaa-v-4.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 02:54:17+00:00

Document:
LOS ANGELES, Calif. (January 14, 2000) - On January 14, 2000, in response to the illegal hacking of the DVD encryption system "CSS," and subsequent Internet distribution of an unauthorized de-encryption formula, the major motion picture companies filed injunction complaints in the Southern District of New York and District of Connecticut against four defendants to prevent them from making the formula available on their web sites. The defendants in New York are Shawn C. Reimerdes, Eric Corley A/K/A "Emmanuel Goldstein," Roman Kazan and Jeraimee Hughes in the District of Connecticut.
The plaintiffs are Universal City Studios, Inc.; Paramount Pictures Corporation; Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.; Tristar Pictures, Inc.; Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.; Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P.; Disney Enterprises, Inc.; and Twentieth Century Fox Film Corporation.
"The MPAA is striking a blow today in defense of the future of American movies. We have filed suit in federal court to stop Internet hackers from distributing the software designed to circumvent the encryption technology that prevents unlawful copying of DVDs."
"This is a case of theft. The posting of the de-encryption formula is no different from making and then distributing unauthorized keys to a department store. The keys have no real purpose except to circumvent the locks that stand between the thief and the goods he or she targets," said Valenti.
Under federal law, it is illegal for anyone to traffic in any product that is designed to render useless encryption devices that protect copyrighted material. In 1998, Congress passed and President Clinton signed the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) to protect the creators of copyrighted material from seeing their lifes work stolen by Internet hackers.
The MPAA strongly supported the DMCA precisely because of concerns about online piracy of motion pictures. The defendants brazen trafficking of the unauthorized utility plainly violates the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA.
"The U.S. movie industry intends to defeat anyone who steals our intellectual property. We are determined to defend the technology that protects artists and intellectual property holders rights," vowed Valenti. "If you cant protect that which you own, then you dont own anything."
Additional information on this case may be found on the MPAA web site at www.mpaa.org.
1. This is a Complaint for injunctive relief and for money damages and related relief against Jeraimee Hughes ("Hughes" or "Defendant"), an individual responsible for proliferating a software device that unlawfully defeats the DVD copy protection and access control system -- the Contents Scramble System ("CSS") -- so that individuals can make, distribute, and/or otherwise electronically transmit or perform unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs copyrighted motion pictures and other audiovisual works. The acts of the Defendant, which are described more fully below, violate the provisions of the United States Copyright Act governing circumvention of copyright protection systems, 17 U.S.C. § 1201, et seq.
2. Plaintiff Universal City Studios, Inc., is a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.
4. Plaintiff Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc. is a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.
5. Plaintiff TriStar Pictures, Inc. is a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.
7. Plaintiff Time Warner Entertainment Co., L.P. is a limited partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware.
8. Plaintiff Disney Enterprises, Inc. is a corporation duly incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware.
10. Plaintiffs are the major motion picture studios in the United States. Each plaintiff is engaged in the business of producing, manufacturing, and/or distributing copyrightable and copyrighted material, including, specifically, motion pictures. Plaintiffs distribute motion pictures theatrically, via television broadcast, and on portable media such as videocassettes tapes and digital versatile discs ("DVDs") for distribution in the home video market. In the course of its business, each plaintiff or its predecessor in interest obtained ownership of the United States copyrights, the exclusive reproduction, adaptation, and/or distribution rights under United States copyrights, and/or the state statutory and common law rights, in various motion pictures embodied in such DVDs. Plaintiffs are the leading producers and distributors of motion pictures in DVD format in the United States, including such recent blockbusters as "Titanic" and "The Matrix," and approximately 4,000 titles have been released in the United States on DVD to date. Current industry estimates place DVD sales at over 1,000,000 units per week.
11. On information and belief, defendant Hughes either resides or has his principal place of business at 50 North Taylor Avenue, Norwalk, Connecticut 06854. Defendant Hughes operates an Internet web site addressed as www.ct2600.org/2600-DVD.html.
12. The Court has jurisdiction of this action under 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq., 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 (federal question) and 1338(a) (copyright).
13. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendant in that he either resides or has his principal place of business in the State of Connecticut.
14. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1400(a) as (a) this is a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred, and/or (b) this is a judicial district in which Defendant resides, and/or (c) this is a judicial district in which Defendant may be found, and there is no judicial district in which the action may otherwise be brought.
15. With the advent of the VCR and videocassette tapes, home viewing of motion pictures became a convenient, inexpensive way to enjoy motion pictures. DVDs are 5-inch-wide discs that hold full-length motion pictures, are the most current technological advancement for private home viewing of motion pictures. This technology significantly improves the clarity and the overall quality of the motion picture when played on a television screen or computer monitor.
16. DVDs incorporating full-length motion pictures, together with additional and ancillary features such as interviews and alternative sound tracks, can be played back for viewing in the home by dedicated, free standing "DVD players" and by personal computers configured with a DVD "drive" and additional hardware or software modules sometimes referred to as "media players."
17. DVDs contain digital information. When motion pictures in form are digital copied or transmitted, the clarity and overall quality of the motion pictures do not suffer (as they do when a copy is made from an analog source, such as a videocassette). Moreover, the fact that the motion pictures contained on DVDs are in digital format allows any unauthorized copies of those motion pictures from DVDs to be widely transmitted over the Internet, stored in computer memory, and duplicated for unlawful sale, transfer or exchange. Once these copies are in the hands of another user, the unlawful process can begin once again because the copies have the clarity and quality of the original DVDs containing the motion picture.
18. Because motion pictures in unprotected digital format on DVDs would be subject to ready, unlimited copying and create a threat to the market viability of DVD technology, the plaintiffs were reluctant to release valuable film libraries and new film releases without the implementation of a copy protection and access control system. Plaintiffs therefore ultimately adopted a copy protection and access control system developed by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. and Toshiba Corporation -- the Contents Scramble System ("CSS") -- in order to provide security to the copyrighted contents of DVDs and thereby provide protection for copyrighted content against unauthorized copying. CSS includes elements of encryption and other security and authentication measures that require DVD playback devices, including appropriately configured personal computers, to operate with certain keys in order to descramble and intelligibly play back copies of motion pictures from DVDs. All members of the DVD industry, including software and hardware manufacturers of DVD players, DVD replicators and the content providers -- the motion picture studios -- adopted CSS as direct licensees or by contracting through CSS licensees.
19. Each of the Plaintiffs relied on the security provided by CSS in manufacturing, producing and distributing to the public copyrighted motion pictures in DVD format. Those motion pictures, many of which involved investments of tens and even hundreds of millions of dollars, were distributed on CSS-protected DVDs.
20. On information and belief, hackers in Europe were able to descramble the encryption on DVDs and create -- and post on the World Wide Web -- an unauthorized utility commonly referred to as "DeCSS," which allows motion pictures in DVD format to be decrypted and illegally copied.
21. Subsequently, defendant Hughes posted DeCSS on his Internet web site, www.ct2600.org/2600-DVD.html. Hughes site states that DeCSS is a "free DVD decoder" that allows "people to copy DVDs."
22. Plaintiffs incorporate by this reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 21, inclusive.
(C) is marketed by that person or another acting in concert with that person with that persons knowledge for use in circumventing a technological measure that effectively controls access to a work protected under this title.
24. Defendant Hughes offers to the public, provides, or otherwise traffics in, DeCSS through his Internet website.
25. CSS is a technological measure that (a) effectively controls access to works protected by the Copyright Act, and (b) effectively protects rights of copyright owners to control whether an end user can reproduce, manufacture, adapt, publicly perform and/or distribute unauthorized copies of their copyrighted works or portions thereof.
26. DeCSS (a) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing CSS or the protection afforded by CSS, (b) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent CSS or the protection afforded by CSS, and/or (c) is marketed by Defendant and/or others acting in concert with him with the knowledge of its use in circumventing CSS or the protection afforded by CSS.
27. By offering to the public, providing, or otherwise trafficking in DeCSS, Defendant has violated the provisions governing Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems set forth in the Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. §§ 1201 et seq.
28. As a direct and proximate result of such violations, Plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial.
29. Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendants violations will continue. Plaintiffs remedy at law is not adequate. Protection of Plaintiffs rights must include an injunction, as well as other remedies available.
COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF PROVISIONS GOVERNING CIRCUMVENTION OF COPYRIGHT PROTECTION SYSTEMS, 17 U.S.C. § 1201, et seq.
1. This is a Complaint for injunctive relief and for money damages and related relief against Shawn C. Reimerdes ("Reimerdes"), Eric Corley a/k/a "Emmanuel Goldstein" ("Corley") and Roman Kazan ("Kazan") (collectively, the "Defendants"), individuals responsible for proliferating a software device that unlawfully defeats the DVD copy protection and access control system -- the Contents Scramble System ("CSS") -- so that individuals can make, distribute, and/or otherwise electronically transmit or perform unauthorized copies of Plaintiffs copyrighted motion pictures and other audiovisual works. The acts of the Defendants, which are described more fully below, violate the provisions of the United States Copyright Act governing circumvention of copyright protection systems, 17 U.S.C. § 1201, et seq.
11. On information and belief, defendant Reimerdes either resides or has his principal place of business at 295 Greenwich St., New York, NY 10007 and/or 162-14 Cryders Lane, Whitestone, NY 11357. Defendant Reimerdes operates an Internet web site addressed as www.dvd-copy.com.
12. On information and belief, defendant Corley, who, on information and belief, uses the nom de net "Emmanuel Goldstein," either resides or has his principal place of business at 7 Strongs Lane, Setauket, New York. Corley a/k/a Emmanual Goldstein operates an Internet web site at www.2600.com/news/1999/1112-files/.
13. On information and belief, defendant Kazan either resides or has his principal place of business at 16 E. 55th Street, New York, New York 10022. Defendant Kazan operates an Internet web site at www.krackdown.com/decss/.
14. The Court has jurisdiction of this action under 17 U.S.C. §§ 101 et seq., 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 (federal question) and 1338(a) (copyright).
15. This Court has personal jurisdiction over the Defendants in that each Defendant either resides or has his principal place of business in the State of New York.
16. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) and 28 U.S.C. § 1400(a) as (a) this is a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claims occurred, and/or (b) all of the defendants reside in the State of New York and this is a judicial district in which some of the defendants reside, and/or (c) this is a judicial district in which some defendants may be found, and there is no judicial district in which the action may otherwise be brought.
18. DVDs incorporating full-length motion pictures, together with additional and ancillary features such as interviews and alternative sound tracks, can be played back for viewing in the home by dedicated, free standing "DVD players" and by personal computers configured with a DVD "drive" and additional hardware or software modules sometimes referred to as "media players."
19. DVDs contain digital information. When motion pictures in form are digital copied or transmitted, the clarity and overall quality of the motion pictures do not suffer (as they do when a copy is made from an analog source, such as a videocassette). Moreover, the fact that the motion pictures contained on DVDs are in digital format allows any unauthorized copies of those motion pictures from DVDs to be widely transmitted over the Internet, stored in computer memory, and duplicated for unlawful sale, transfer or exchange. Once these copies are in the hands of another user, the unlawful process can begin once again because the copies have the clarity and quality of the original DVDs containing the motion picture.
20. Because motion pictures in unprotected digital format on DVDs would be subject to ready, unlimited copying and create a threat to the market viability of DVD technology, the plaintiffs were reluctant to release valuable film libraries and new film releases without the implementation of a copy protection and access control system. Plaintiffs therefore ultimately adopted a copy protection and access control system developed by Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. and Toshiba Corporation -- the Contents Scramble System ("CSS") -- in order to provide security to the copyrighted contents of DVDs and thereby provide protection for copyrighted content against unauthorized copying. CSS includes elements of encryption and other security and authentication measures that require DVD playback devices, including appropriately configured personal computers, to operate with certain keys in order to descramble and intelligibly play back copies of motion pictures from DVDs. All members of the DVD industry, including software and hardware manufacturers of DVD players, DVD replicators and the content providers -- the motion picture studios -- adopted CSS as direct licensees or by contracting through CSS licensees.
21. Each of the Plaintiffs relied on the security provided by CSS in manufacturing, producing and distributing to the public copyrighted motion pictures in DVD format. Those motion pictures, many of which involved investments of tens and even hundreds of millions of dollars, were distributed on CSS-protected DVDs.
23. Subsequently, defendant Reimerdes posted DeCSS on his Internet web site, www.dvd-copy.com, along with the statement "Yes, you can trade DVD movie files over the Internet . . . You can break the encryption on any DVD and allow users to copy the contents of a DVD onto the a [sic] hard drive or alternative media! Notice: The DVD Copy Control Association are cocksuckers!" Reimerdes also told Internet users, under a section titled "How To Find/Trade FREE DVD Movies Online," that "people gather online in impromptu communities and trade these digital copies through one-to-one file transfers and group chatting."
24. Defendant Eric Corley a/k/a Emmanuel Goldstein also posted DeCSS on his Internet web site www.2600.com/news/1999/1112-files. Corleys site states that DeCSS is a "free DVD decoder" that allows "people to copy DVDs." Corleys site also exhorts others ("as many of you as possible all throughout the world") to "take and mirror [the DeCSS] files . . . ."
29. CSS is a technological measure that (a) effectively controls access to works protected by the Copyright Act, and (b) effectively protects rights of copyright owners to control whether an end user can reproduce, manufacture, adapt, publicly perform and/or distribute unauthorized copies of their copyrighted works or portions thereof.
30. DeCSS (a) is primarily designed or produced for the purpose of circumventing CSS or the protection afforded by CSS, (b) has only limited commercially significant purpose or use other than to circumvent CSS or the protection afforded by CSS, and/or (c) is marketed by Defendants and/or others acting in concert with them with the knowledge of its use in circumventing CSS or the protection afforded by CSS.
32. As a direct and proximate result of such violations, Plaintiffs have been damaged in an amount to be proven at trial.
33. Unless enjoined by this Court, Defendants violations will continue. Plaintiffs remedy at law is not adequate. Protection of Plaintiffs rights must include an injunction, as well as other remedies available.
3. For Plaintiffs attorneys fees and costs pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 1203(b).

References: § 1201
 § 1391
 § 1400
 § 1201
 § 1201
 § 1391
 § 1400
 § 1203