Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Sec-362-Express-reservation-or-exception.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 18:21:49+00:00

Document:
49. Shaw v. Hitchcock, 119 Mass. 254; Fox v. Mission Free School, 120 Mo. 349, 25 S. W. 172.
50. Kingsland v. Tucker, 115 N. Y. 574, 22 N. E. 268; Sheldon Bank v. Royce, 84 Iowa, 288, 50 N. W. 986.
That the builder of the wall failed to extend it over a small portion of the division line as he agreed to do was held not to 'prevent recovery upon the other's covenant. Keith v. Ridge, 146 Mo. 90, 47 S. W. 904.
The covenant to pay one-half of the cost of the wall was held not to include one half the cost of additions made by a purchaser from the builder, on his own land, for the purpose of strengthening the wall for his own purposes. Walker v. Stetson, 162 Mass. 86, 44 Am. St. Rep. 350, 38 N. E. Is.
51. Sherley v. Burns, 22 Ky. L. Rep. 788, 58 S. W. 69.
52. Rawson v Bell, 46 Ga. 19; Nalle v. Paggi, 81 Tex. 201, 13 L. R. A. 50, 16 S. W. 932. Compare Hurford v. Smith, 24 Okla. 448, 103 Pac. 851. And cases cited Post, Sec. 393(b), note 74.
53-57. See post, Sec. 436.
58. Durham & S. Ry. Co. v. Walker, 2 Q. B. 940; Wickham v. Hawker, 7 Mees. & W. 63; Corporation of London v. Riggs, 13 Ch. Div. 798.
59. See post, Sec. 436.
580, 50 N. J. Eq. 464, 20 L. R. A. 631, 25 Atl. 319; Borst v. Empie, 1 Seld. N. Y. 33; Rose v. Bunn, 21 N. Y. 275; Grafton v. Moir, 130 N. Y. 465, 27 Am. St. Rep. 533, 29 N. E. 974; Richardson v. Clements, 89 Pa. St. 503, 33 Am. Rep. 784; Kister v. Reeser, 98 Pa. St. 1, 42 Am. Rep. 608; Fischer v. Laack, 76 Wis. 313, 45 N. W. 104.
61. Inhabitants of Winthrop v. Fairbanks, 41 Me. 307; Ring v. Walker, 87 Me. 550, 33 Atl. 174; Claflin v. Boston & A. R. Co., 157 Mass. 489, 20 L. R. A. 638, 32 N. E. 659; Bridger v. Pier3on, 45 N. Y. 601; Lcavitt v. Towle, 8 X. H. 96.
98 Pa. 1; Riefler & Sons v. Wayne Storage Water Power Co., 232 Pa. 282, 81 Atl. 300.
65. Koelle v. Knecht, 99 111. 396; Dawson v. Western Md. R. Co., 107 Md. 70, 14 L. R. A. (N. S.) 809, 126 Am. St. Rep. 337, 15 Ann. Cas. 678, 68 Atl. 301; Bean v. French, 140 Mass. 229; Childs v. Boston & M. R. R., 213 Mass. 91.
99 N. E. 957; Hornbeck v. West-brook, 9 Johns. (N. Y.) 73; Kister v. Rieser, 98 Pa. 1. And so it has been said that the word "heirs ' is necessary in the case of a reservation of oil and gas, but not in the case of an exception of oil and gas. Mandle v. Gharing, 256 Pa. 121, 100 Atl. 535.
Iowa, 195, 158 N. W. 692; Bein-lem v. Johns. 102 Ky. 570, 44 S W. 128; Ruff in v. Seaboard Air Line Rwy., 151 N. Car. 330, 66 S. E. 317; Ruhnke v. Aubert, 58 Ore. 6, 113 Pac. 38; Forde v. Libby, 22 Wyo. 464, 143 Pac. 1190. 67. Webb v. Jones, 163 Ala. 637, 50 So. 887 (dictum); Chap-pell v. N. Y., N. H. & H. R. Co., 62 Conn. 195, 17 L. R. A. 420, 24 Atl. 997; Teachout v. Capital Lodge I. O. O. F., 128 Iowa, 380, 104 X. W. 440; Ring v. Walker, 87 Me. 550, 33 Atl. 174; Engel v. Ayer, 85 Me. 448, 27 Atl. 352; Lathrop v. Eisner, 93 Mich. 599, 53 N. W. 791; Smith v. Furbish, 68 N. H. 123, 47 L. R. A. 226. 44 Atl. 398. But as to Maine see Winthrop v. Fairbanks, 41 Me. 307; Dana v. Smith, 114 Me. 262, 95 At. 1034.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.