Source: http://scinn.nas.gov.ua/en/archive/7%283%29/7%283%2901
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 01:03:54+00:00

Document:
The new method of fractal analysis of transport networks (in particular city), which provides an estimation of their self-organization degree, is considered. It is established that real fractal dimension of transport networks, which is selforganized by transport vehicles, equals 1,22 and is typical for disordered polymeric fibers and channels formed by fluid flow through porous materials.
1. Batty M., Longley P., Fotheringham A. Urban growth and form: scaling, fractal geometry, and diffusion-limited aggregation. Environment and Planning. 1989. A 21. P. 1447-1472.
2. Chen Y., Luo, J. The fractal features of the transport network of Henan Province. J. of Xinyang Teachers College. 1998. 11(2): 172-177.
3. Rodin V., Rodina E. The fractal dimension of Tokyo's streets. Fractals. 2000. V. 8. P. 413-418.
4. Shen G. A fractal dimension analysis of urban transportation networks. Geographical and Environmental Modelling. 1997. V. 1. P. 221-236.
5. Benguigui L., Daoud M. Is the Suburban Railway System a Fractal? Geographical Analysis. 1991. V. 23. P. 363-368.
6. Song C., Havlin S., Makse H.A. Self-similarity of complex networks. Nature (London). 2005. V. 433. P. 392-395.
7. Song C., Havlin S., Makse H.A. Origins of fractality in the growth of complex networks. Nature Physics. 2006. V. 2. P. 275-281.
8. Shahturin D.V. Modelirovanie informacionnyh dannyh v bol'shih setjah. Elektronika i informacion nye tehnologii (Elektronnyj zhurnal). 2009. No 2(7) [in Russian].
9. Benguigui L., Daoud M. Is the Suburban Railway System a Fractal? Geographical Analysis. 1991. 23(4): 362-368.
10. Batty M. Cities as Fractals: Simulating Growth and Form. Fractal and Chaos. Ed. By A.Grilly, R Earnashaw, H. Jones. N.Y.: Springer, 1991. P. 43-69.
11. Mandelbrot B. How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science. 1967. 156. P. 636-638.
12. Cit. po: Dubovikov M.M., Krjanev A.V., Starchenko N.V. Razmernost' minimal'nogo pokrytija i lokal'nyj analiz fraktal'nyh vremennyh rjadov. Vestnik RUDN. T3. 2004. No 1: 81-95 [in Russian].
13. Aleksandrov P.S., Pasynkov B.A. Vvedenie v teoriju razmernosti. Moskva: Nauka, 1973 [in Russian].
14. Hausdorff F. Dimesion und Ausseres Mass. Matematishe Annalen. 1919. V. 79. P. 157-179.
15. Kronover R.M. Fraktaly i haos v dinamicheskih siste mah. Osnovy teorii. Moskva: Postmarket, 2000 [in Russian].
16. Feder E. Fraktaly: Per. s angl. Moskva: Mir, 1991.
18. Morency C., Chapleau R. Fractal geometry for the characterisation of urban-related states: Greater Montreal Case. HarFA — Harmonic and Fractal Image Analysis (e-journal). 2003. P. 30-34.
20. Bourke P. Fractal Dimension Calculator. local.wasp.uwa.edu.au/ pbourke/fractals/fracdi.
21. Roy A., Perfect E., Dunne W. M., McKay L. D. (2007), Fractal characterization of fracture networks: An improved box-counting technique, J. Geophys. Res., 112, B12201.
22. Lu Y, Tang J. Fractal dimension of a transportation network and its relationship with urban growth: a study of the Dal las — Fort Worth area. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 2004. 31(6): 895-911.
23. Tang J. Evaluating the relationship between urban road pattern and population using fractal geometry.
26. Malineckij G.G. Novaja real'nost' i budushhee glazami sinergetiki. http://www.smi-svoi.ru/content/?fl= 590&sn=1469 [in Russian].
27. Evdokimov Ju.K., Shahturin D.V. Issledovanie informacionnyh potokov dannyh v telekommunikacionnyh setjah. fetmag.mrsu.ru/.../pdf/Information_data_flow.pdf [in Russian].
28. Stryhaljuk B.M. Fraktal'nyj sposib prognozuvannja potokiv u mul'tyservisnyh merezhah. Radioelektronika ta telekomunikacii'. Visnyk NU «L'vivs'ka politehnika». 2009. No 645. S. 88-95 [in Ukrainian].
30. Evdokimov Ju.K., Shahturin D.V. Analiz sistemnyh svojstv bol'shih kommunikacionnyh setej na primere topologii rossijskih zheleznodorozhnyh dorog. Zhurnal «Nelinejnyj mir». 2010. No 5. C. 297-301 [in Russian].
31. Cieplak M., Maritan A., Banavar J. Optimal paths and domain walls in the strong disorder limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994. V. 72. P. 2320-2324.
32. Cieplak M., Maritan A., Banavar J. Optimal paths and domain walls in the strong disorder limit. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1994. V. 72. P. 2320-2324.
33. Cieplak M., Maritan A., Banavar J. Invasion percolation and Eden growth: Geometry and universality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1996. V. 76. P. 3754-3757.
34. Dobrin R., Duxbury P.M. Minimum Spanning Trees on Ran dom Networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2001. V. 86. P. 5076.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.