Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/321206850/Dion-Taylor-v-Michael-Lang-4th-Cir-2012
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 00:22:23+00:00

Document:
South Carolina, at Rock Hill.
Before WILKINSON, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Dion Orlando Taylor, Appellant Pro Se.
his constitutional rights, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006).
entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
is a genuine dispute as to those facts.
Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S.
excessive use of force in violation of the Eighth Amendment.
inhumane treatment and conditions while imprisoned.
v. Benjamin, 77 F.3d 756, 761 (4th Cir. 1996).
Whitley, 475 U.S. at 322.
by the officials, to temper the severity of the force applied.
See Hudson v. McMillian, 503 U.S. 1, 7 (1992).
justification for the force Sergeant Lang used against Taylor.
events that transpired between Lang and Taylor in Langs favor.
v. Porter, 737 F.2d 368, 372 (4th Cir. 1984).
See Shaw v. Stroud, 13 F.3d 791, 799 (4th Cir. 1994).
any view by this Court as to the merits of Taylors claim.
the sound judgment of the district court.
administrative grievances is without merit.
See Adams v. Rice, 40 F.3d 72, 75 (4th Cir. 1994).
judgment and remand for further proceedings.

References: v. 

v. 
 v. 

v. 
 v. 
 v.