Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Real-Property-Interests-Law/Execution-sale-of-mortgagor-s-interest-Continued.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 22:22:05+00:00

Document:
71. Rawson v. Plaisted, 151 Mass. 71, 23 N. E. 722.
73. Seaman v. Hax, 14 Colo. 536, 9 L. R. A. 341, 24 Pac. 461; Cushing v. Hurd, 4 Pick. (Mass.) 253, 16 Am. Dec. 335; Walters T. Defenbaugh, 90 111. 241.
74. See Atkins v. Sawyer, 1 Pick. (Mass.) 351, 11 Am. Dec. 188; Camp v. Coxe, 1 Dev. & B. (N. C.) 52.
75. See Delaplaine v. Hitchcock, 6 Hill (N. Y.) 14; Gale v. Hammond, 45 Mich. 147, 7 N. W. 761; Boone v. Armstrong, 87 Ind. 168.
76. Carpenter v. Bowen, 42 Miss. 28; Tice v. Annin, 2 Johns.
Ch. (N. Y.) 125; Van Mater v. Conover, 18 N. J. Eq. 38; see Lydecker v. Bogert, 38 N. J. Eq. 136.
77. Powell v. Williams, 14 Ala. 476, 48 Am. Dec. 105; Barker v. Bell, 37 Ala. 358; Atkins v. Sawyer, 1 Pick. (Mass.) 351, 11 Am. Dec. 18S; Camp v. Coxe, 1 Dev. & B. (N. C.) 52; Simpson v. Simpson, 93 N. C. 373. That this is so when the mortgage creditor himself purchases at the execution sale, see Lumley v. Robinson, 26 Mo. 364; Young v. Ruth, 55 Mo. 515.
78. Youse v. McCreary, 2 Blackf. (Ind.) 243; Crooker v. Frazier, 52 Me. 406; Lord v. Cro-well, 75 Me. 399; Fosdick v. Risk, 15 Ohio, 84, 45 Am. Dec. 562. But see Fithian v. Corwin, 17 Ohio St. 118; Horbach v. Riley, 7 Pa. 81; Day v. Lowrie, 5 Watts (Pa.) 412. See Waller v. Tate, 4 B. Mon. (Ky.) 529; Matthews v. Eddy, 4 Ore. 225. But if the sale was under a judgment on a part only of the notes secured by the mortgage, it could not, it seems, affect the right of another person, holding the balance of the notes, subsequently to foreclose. Pugh v. Fairmont Gold & Silver Min. Co., 112 U. S. 238, 28 L. Ed. 684.
79. Ireland's Lessee v. Hall, 10 Johns. (N. Y.) 481; Rice v. Wil-burn, 31 Ark. 108; Whitemore v. Tatum, 54 Ark. 457.
80. See McClure v. Mounce, 2 McCord L. (S. C.) 423, and cases cited in next following notes.
81. Goring's Ex'r v. Shreve, 7 Dana (Ky.) 64.
82. Tice v. Annin, 2 Johns. Ch. (N. Y.) 125; Lumley v. Robinson, 26 Mo. 364.
83. Tice v. Annin, 2 Johns. Ch.
(N. Y.) 125; Goring's Ex'r v. Shreve, 7 Dana (Ky.) 64.
84. Van Mater v. Conover, 18 N. J. Eq. 38; Lumley v. Robinson, 26 Mo. 364.
85. Carpenter v. Eowen, 42 Miss. 28.
86. Cottingham v. Springer, 88 111. 90.
87. Lumley v. Robinson, 26 Mo. 364.
88. McLure v. Wheeler, 6 Rich. Eq. (S. C.) 343.
89. Lydecker v. Bogart, 38 N. J. Eq. 136.
90. Johnson v. Stevens, 7 Cush. (Mass.) 431.
91. Crane v. March, 4 Pick. (Mass.) 131, 16 Am. Dec. 329; Andrews v. Fiske, 101 Mass. 422.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.