Source: http://pa.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20180508_0001152.EPA.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 12:37:11+00:00

Document:
THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Defendant, Counter-Plaintiff.
ROBERT F. KELLY, Sr. J.
Presently before the Court is Mr. Thomas' Motion to Dismiss Defendant's Counterclaim and Prudential's Memorandum of Law in Opposition. For the reasons noted below, Mr. Thomas' Motion is denied.
[N]ever name . . . any Released Party or their insurers as a Defendant, Cross-Defendant or Third-Party Defendant in any suit, nor will [Mr. Thomas] institute any cause of action or assert any claim against any Released Party or their insurers arising from, or in any way related to . . . any claim released herein.
A motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) tests the sufficiency of a complaint. Kost v. Kozakiewicz, 1 F.3d 176, 183 (3d Cir. 1993). “To survive a motion to dismiss, a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 679 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)) (internal quotation marks omitted). In deciding a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), courts must “accept as true all allegations in the complaint and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from them after construing them in the light most favorable to the non-movant.” Davis v. Wells Fargo, 824 F.3d 333, 341 (3d Cir. 2016) (quoting Foglia v. Renal Ventures Mgmt., LLC, 754 F.3d 153, 154 n.1 (3d Cir. 2014)) (internal quotation marks omitted). However, courts need not “accept mere conclusory factual allegations or legal assertions.” In re Asbestos Prods. Liab. Litig. (No. VI), 822 F.3d 125, 133 (3d Cir. 2016) (citing Iqbal, 556 U.S. at 678-79). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555. Finally, we may consider “only the complaint, exhibits attached to the complaint, matters of public record, as well as undisputedly authentic documents if the complainant's claims are based upon [those] documents.” Davis, 824 F.3d at 341 (quoting Mayer v. Belichick, 605 F.3d 223, 230 (3d Cir. 2010)) (internal quotation marks omitted).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.