Source: https://www.howdoifilefordivorce.com/legalquestions/whatisvisitation.shtml
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 02:45:48+00:00

Document:
When one parent has sole physical custody of the child, the other parent is awarded visitation rights. This means the other parent has the right to see the child on a regularly scheduled basis. Please see specific state for details and/or differences.
The court's award of visitation rights is guided by what is in the best interest of the child. Alabama Code 30-3-1.
A court may award visitation by a parent who has committed domestic or family violence only if the court finds that adequate provision for the safety of the child and the other parent can be made. The court may order the exchange of the child to occur at a protected setting, that visitation be supervised, that overnight visitation be prohibited, or other steps to protect the child and insure that the child's best interest is being followed.
The court shall grant visitation which is in the best interest of a child. Alaska statutes provide for a specific cause of action by a parent with visitation rights against the custodial parent if there has been failure by the custodial parent to permit visitation with the minor child. When a court order is specific as to when a custodian of a minor child must permit another person to have visitation, and the custodian fails, willfully and without just excuse, to permit visitation in substantial conformance with the court order, then the person entitled to visitation may seek damages against the custodian. The amount of damages is $200 for each failure of the custodian, willfully and without just excuse, to permit visitation with the child for substantially the length of time and substantially in the same manner as specified in the court order. This amount may not be increased or decreased once liability has been established. If the court determines that the custodian's refusal is a single continuous period of visitation, then the custodian is not liable for more than one failure. The prevailing party in an action commenced under this law is entitled to recover a reasonable attorney fee. "Just excuse" includes illness of the child which makes it dangerous to the health of the child for visitation to take place. "Just excuse" does not include the wish of the child not to have visitation with the person entitled to visitation.
A parent not granted custody of the child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights to ensure that the minor child has frequent and continuing contact with the non-custodial parent unless the court finds, after a hearing, that visitation would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health. The court may modify an order for visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interests of the child. The court shall not restrict visitation rights unless it finds that the visitation would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.
The court shall assess attorney fees and court costs against either parent if the court finds that the parent has unreasonably denied, restricted or interfered with court order visitation. ARS §25-37.
The Arkansas custody statute does not specifically give the court the jurisdiction to address the issue of visitation. However, presumably, visitation is also dealt with in accordance with the welfare and best interest of the children. Visitation rights of brothers and sisters are specifically provided for. Any person who is a brother or sister of a minor child may petition for reasonable visitation rights in the event where the parent has denied such access. Grandparents are also awarded visitation rights, conditioned that visitation must be in the best interest and welfare of the minor child. Ark. stat. Ann. 9-13-101 to 9-13-103.
The court shall grant reasonable visitation rights to a parent unless it has shown that the visitation would be detrimental to the best interest of the child. In the discretion of the court, reasonable visitation rights may be granted to any other person having an interest in the welfare of the child. The court may grant reasonable visitation to a step-parent, if visitation by the step-parent is determined to be in the best interest of the child. However, visitation rights may not be ordered to a step-parent if that would conflict with a right of custody or visitation of a birth parent who is not a party to the proceeding.
Cal. Fam. Code §3100 and 3101.
To emphasize the importance of frequent contact between child and both parents, the Colorado laws have replaced visitation with the concept of "parenting time." A parent not granted custody of the child is entitled to reasonable parenting time rights unless the court finds, after a hearing, that parenting time by that parent would endanger the child's physical health or significantly impair the child's emotional development. The court may make or modify an Order for parenting time rights whenever such order or modification would serve the best interest of the child. A motion to restrict parenting time which alleges that the child is in imminent physical or emotional danger due to the parenting time by the parent, shall be heard and ruled upon by the court not later than seven days after the day of the filing of the motion. If the court finds that the filing of a motion to limit parenting time was substantially frivolous or groundless, the court shall order the moving party to pay the reasonable and necessary attorney fees and costs of the responding party. If a party is denied parenting time, the court can order make-up parenting time. CRSA §14-10-129 and 14-10-129.5.
In making, modifying, or terminating an order for visitation rights, the court shall be guided by the best interests of the child. The court gives consideration to the wishes of the child if he or she is of sufficient age and capable of forming an intelligent opinion. Visitation rights may be granted in the court's discretion to any person. Such order for visitation shall be according to the court's best judgment upon the facts of the case. C.G.S.A. §46b-59.
In all proceeding for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court has the power to restrict visitation by the non-custodial parent if the court finds that visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development. A parent's failure to pay child support because of the parent's inability to do so shall not be sufficient cause for denial of visitation. The court shall modify an Order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modifications would serve the best interest of the child. If the court finds that a person has been wrongfully deprived of the duly established right to visitation, the court shall order the custodial parent to permit additional visits to compensate for the visitation for which the person was deprived. The court may also consider a temporary transfer of custody or primary residence or both for up to 30 days, without the transfer being considered a modification of the custody provision in the decree. The court may also consider assessing a surcharge against a parent with rights of visitation for that parent's unilateral failure, without just cause or sufficient notice, to comply with the visitation schedule. Failure to comply consists of more than minimal violations, such as slight alterations in the time for visitation. The amount of the surcharge shall be up to 10% of the visiting parent's monthly child support obligation for each violation and shall be payable to the parent with whom the child resides. The court may impose such other sanctions or remedies as the court deems just and proper to ensure the maintenance of frequent and meaningful contact between parent and child and participation by both parents in the child's upbringing if the parents have joint legal custody. 13 DCA §728.
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court has the power to restrict visitation by the non-custodial parent if the court finds that visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development. A parent's failure to pay child support because of the parent's inability to do so shall not be sufficient cause for denial of visitation. The court shall modify an Order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child. If the court finds that a person has been wrongfully deprived of the duly established right to visitation, the court shall order the custodial parent to permit additional visits to compensate for the visitation of which the person was deprived. FSA §61.13.
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court has the power to restrict visitation by the non-custodial parent if the court finds that visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development. A parent's failure to pay child support because of the parent's inability to do so shall not be sufficient cause for denial of visitation. The court shall modify an Order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child. The provision in the decree awarding visitation rights may be modified at any time without the necessity of showing a substantial change in circumstances, provided that the review and modification of the visitation provision shall not be done more often than once in every two-year period following the date of entry of the judgment.
In the discretion of the court, reasonable visitation rights shall be awarded to parents, grandparents and any person interested in the welfare of the child, unless it is shown that rights of visitation are detrimental to the best interests of the child. In any court proceeding involving visitation of a minor child, the court may order any party and the minor child, as needed, to attend counseling, parenting classes, or any other type of educational activity, as the court deems appropriate to meet the best interest of the child. HRS §571-46 and 571-46.2.
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The District Court may grant reasonable visitation rights to grandparents or great grandparents upon a proper showing that the visitation would be in the best interests of the child. IC §32-717 an 32-719.
A parent not granted custody of a child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights unless the court finds, after a hearing, that visitation would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral, or emotional health. 750 ILCS 5/607.
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court has the power to restrict visitation by the non-custodial parent if the court finds that visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development. A parent's failure to pay child support because of the parent's inability to do so shall not be sufficient cause for denial of visitation. The court shall modify an Order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child. In any action filed to enforce or modify an order granting or denying visitation rights, the court may award reasonable attorney fees and costs. The court will consider, among other factors, the following: 1) whether the Petitioner substantially prevailed and whether the court found that the Respondent knowingly or intentionally violated an order granting or denying visitation rights; and 2) whether the Respondent substantially prevailed and the court found that the action was frivolous.
The court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court will order liberal visitation rights where appropriate, in order to assure the child the opportunity for the maximum continuing physical and emotional contact with both parents. The court will restrict visitation if necessary to prevent physical harm or significant emotional harm to the child.
A parent not granted custody or residency of the child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights unless the court finds, after a hearing, that visitation would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral, or emotional health. Grandparents and step-parents may be granted visitation rights. The court may modify an order for visitation rights whenever it would serve the best interests of the child. Repeated unreasonable denial of or interference with visitation rights may be considered a material change of circumstances which justifies modification of a prior order of child custody. KSA 60-1616.
To assist the enforcement of visitation rights, Kansas law provides for an expedited procedure to provide justice without requiring the assistance of an attorney. If visitation rights are denied or interfered with by the other parent, the parent having visitation rights may file with the Clerk of the District Court a Motion for Enforcement of Visitation Rights. Such motion shall be filed on a form provided by the clerk. A judge or hearing officer is then assigned to hear the motion. Mediation may be ordered to attempt resolution of the dispute. If the hearing officers or judge finds that visitation rights have been unreasonably denied or interfered with, an order may be entered to provide for a specific visitation schedule compensating visitation time, assessment of attorney fees and costs, attendance of one or both parents at counseling or educational classes, supervised visitation, requiring the offending parent to post a bond or cash to ensure compliance with the court order granting visitation rights, or any other remedy which seems appropriate under the circumstances. KSA §23-701.
A parent not granted custody of a child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights unless the court finds, after a hearing, that visitation would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral, or emotional health. Upon request of either party, the court shall issue orders which are specific as to the frequency, timing, duration, conditions, and method of scheduling visitation. Such orders shall reflect the development age of the child. If domestic violence and abuse have been alleged, the court shall, after a hearing, determine the visitation arrangement which would not endanger seriously the child's or custodial parent's physical, mental, or emotional health. The court may modify an order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child. The court shall not restrict the parent's visitation rights unless it finds that the visitation would seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral, or emotional health. K.R.S. §403.320.
A parent not granted custody or joint custody of a child is entitled to reasonable visitation rights, unless the court finds, after a hearing, that visitation would not be in the best interest of the child. Under extraordinary circumstances, the court may grant reasonable visitation rights to a relative of the child if the court finds that it is in the best interest of the child. In such a case, the court shall consider the length and quality of the relationship between the child and the relative, the reasonable preference of the child, the willingness of the relative to encourage a close relationship between the child and parents, and all other relevant circumstances. CC Art. 136.
The traditional concepts of "custody" and "visitation" are no longer provided in Maine statutes. The Maine court makes an award of parental rights and responsibilities which includes, exclusively or proportionately, all parent-child contact. The parties are required to use a good faith effort to resolve all issues in mediation. 19 MRSA §752.
The court has considerable discretion to award visitation rights which are in the best interest of a child. ACM §1-201.
In any custody or visitation proceeding, if the court determines that a party has unjustifiably denied or interfered with visitation granted by a Decree or Order, the court may, in addition to any other remedy available to the court and in a manner consistent with the best interest of the child, take any or all of the following actions: 1) order that visitation by rescheduled; 2) modify visitation to require additional terms or conditions designed to ensure future compliance with the Order; or 3) assess costs and attorney fees against the party who has unjustifiably denied or interfered with visitation rights. ACM §9-105.
In all proceedings for divorce or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. ALM 208 §28 and 31.
Visitation shall be granted in accordance with the best interest of the child. It is presumed to be in the best interest of a child for the child to have a strong relationship with both parents.
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court has the power to restrict visitation by the non-custodial parent if the court finds that visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development. A parent's failure to pay child support because of the parent's inability to do so shall not be sufficient cause for denial of visitation. The court shall modify an Order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child. If the court finds that a person has been wrongfully deprived of a duly established right to visitation, the court shall order the custodial parent to permit additional visits to compensate for the visitation of which the person was deprived.
In all proceedings for divorce or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court has the power to restrict visitation by the non-custodial parent if the court finds that visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health, or impair the child's emotional development. A parent's failure to pay child support because of the parent's inability to do so shall not be sufficient cause for denial of visitation. The court shall modify an Order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child. The court has discretion to modify the visitation terms of the decree if there have been changes in the circumstances and a modification would be in the best interest of the child.
The non-custodial parent is entitled to reasonable visitation rights unless the court finds, after a hearing, the visitation would endanger the child's physical health or impair his or her emotional development. The extent of visitation will be determined based on what is in the best interest of the child.
In the event of non-compliance with visitation by the custodial parent, the non-custodial parent may file a motion for contempt. If the court finds that the visitation order has not been complied with, without good cause, the court shall define the non-custodial parent's visitation in detail and shall exercise its discretion in allowing compensatory visitation or temporary custody for the non-custodial parent, together with a judgment for the reasonable expenses incurred by the non-custodial parent as a result of denial of visitation. Attorney fees and costs to enforce visitation rights shall be assessed against the parent who unreasonably denies or interferes with visitation. VAMS §452.400.
A parent who is not granted custody is entitled to reasonable visitation rights unless the court finds, after a hearing, that visitation would endanger seriously the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health. The court may grant reasonable visitation rights to a grandparent if the court finds, after hearing, that the visitation would be in the best interest of the child. The court may not restrict a parent's visitation rights unless the court finds that visitation would endanger seriously the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.
If a non-custodial parent or other person residing in the non-custodial parent's household has been convicted of any of a specified list of crimes, the custodial parent may file an objection to visitation with the court. The non-custodial parent then has twenty days to respond. Visitation rights will be suspended if the non-custodial parent fails to respond within 20 days. If the non-custodial parent responds and objects, the court must hold a hearing within thirty days. The non-custodial parent has the burden at the hearing to prove the visitation would not seriously endanger the child's physical, mental, moral or emotional health.
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court has the power to restrict visitation by the non-custodial parent if the court finds that visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development. A parent's failure to pay child support because of the parent's inability to do so shall not be sufficient cause for denial of visitation. The court shall modify an Order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child. The court may enter orders as are reasonably necessary to enforce visitation rights. The court may use contempt powers to enforce court orders in relation to visitation. The court may require either parent to file a bond, or otherwise give security, to ensure his or her compliance with visitation orders. Reasonable attorney fees may be awarded against a party found to be in contempt for refusing to comply with court-ordered visitation. Reissued Revised Statutes 42-364 and 42-364.15.
In all proceedings for divorce or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child-to-parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. Any Decree or Order awarding a party the right of visitation must define the right with sufficient particularity to ensure that the rights of the parties can be properly enforced to achieve the best interests of the child. NRS 125.480 and 125A.290.
New Hampshire has done away with the traditional concept of visitation for the non-custodial parent. The New Hampshire courts now award physical custodial rights to both parents. In those cases where joint legal custody is awarded to both parents and primary physical custody is awarded to one of the parents, the other parent shall be awarded "physical custodial rights" during all periods of time with the children, previously referred to as visitation. RSA 458:17.
In all proceedings for divorce or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court should deny visitation rights only in those rare cases where it has been clearly and convincingly proven that granting of visitation will cause physical or emotional harm to children, or where a parent is unfit. Visitation rights are enforceable independently of the obligation to pay child support. NJSA 9:2-4 and Rule 5:8, New Jersey Rules of Court.
Visitation is a period of time available to a non-custodial parent, under a sole custody arrangement, during which a child resides with or is under the care and control of the non-custodial parent. An award of visitation shall be determined based on what is in the best interest of the child.
In all proceedings for divorce or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child-to-parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. Domestic Relations Law §240.
New York law allows a parent with visitation rights to withhold payment of spousal maintenance if the custodial parent/maintenance recipient has wrongfully interfered with or withheld visitation rights provided by a divorce decree. However, the law clearly states that interference with visitation is not justification for failure to pay child support. Domestic Relations Law §241.
In all proceedings for divorce or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. Visitation rights may be denied to a non-custodial parent only if the judge makes written findings of fact that the parent being denied visitation rights in an unfit person to visit the child or that such visitation rights are not in the best interest of the child. GS §50-13.5(i).
In an action for divorce, the court may make such order for custody of the children as deemed appropriate and consistent with the best interest of the child. The court shall, upon request of the non-custodial parent, grant such rights of visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a parent-child relationship that will be beneficial to the child, unless the court finds, after a hearing, that visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health. If the court finds that a parent has perpetrated domestic violence, the court shall allow only supervised visitation with that parent, unless there is a showing by clear and convincing evidence that unsupervised visitation would not endanger the child's physical or emotional health. NDCC §14-05-22.
Ohio statutes have eliminated the terms, "custody" and "visitation." Instead, the Ohio courts allocate the parental rights and responsibilities for the care of the minor children, in accordance with the best interest of the children. The court may designate one parent to become the "residential parent" for determining where the child resides the majority of the time. The other rights and responsibilities for the care of the children would then be divided between the parents in a manner constant with the best interests of the the children, which includes the right of the parent who is not the residential parent to have continuing contact with the children. Both parents are entitled to have frequent and continuing contact with the children, unless it would not be in the best inters of the children. ORC 3109.04.
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The decree shall provide a specified minimum amount of visitation between the non-custodial parent and the child. Except for good cause shown, the decree shall encourage additional visitation and encourage liberal telephone communications between the non-custodial parent and the child. Violation of an order providing for visitation rights may be enforced by the non-custodial parent by civil contempt. Unless the custodial parent establishes good cause for not complying with visitation provisions of a decree, the non-custodial parent shall be entitled to recover court costs and attorney fees expended to enforce the order.
43 Okl.St.Ann. §109 and 111.1.
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court shall provide the non-custodial parent with sufficient access to the child to provide for quality parenting time. The court shall recognize the value of close contact between both parents and the child. The court may include in the decree a provision requiring that neither parent shall move to a residence more than 60 miles from the other parent without giving the other parent reasonable notice of the change of residence and providing a copy of such notice to the court. The court shall order modification of visitation rights if the parents submit to the court a notarized stipulation signed by both parents and requesting such modification together with a proposed Order. At its' discretion, the court may order the matter set for a hearing and require the parties to appear personally before the court. The court may modify visitation provisions in a decree, or may terminate or modify child support in the event visitation is denied by the custodial parent. The court may grant this relief after motion by the parent with visitation rights, and a court hearing where it was shown that the custodial parent interfered with or denied, without good cause, the exercise of the visitation rights.
ORS 107.105(1)(b), 107.159, 107.174, and 107.431.
Under Pennsylvania law, there is a distinction between "visitation" and "partial custody." Visitation is the right to visit a child, but does not include the right to remove the child from the custodial parent's control. Partial custody is the right to take possession of a child away from the custodial parent for a certain period of time. The right of partial custody, as well as the more limited right of visitation, is awarded by the court according to what is in the best interest of the child.
In all proceedings for divorce or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court shall provide for the reasonable right of visitation by the non-custodial parent, except upon a showing of cause why the right should not be granted. The court shall mandate compliance with its order by both the custodial parent and the children. In the event of non-compliance, the non-custodial parent may file a motion for contempt in Family Court. Upon a finding by the court that the order for visitation has not been complied with, the court shall exercise its discretion in providing a remedy and shall define the non-custodial parent's visitation in detail. However, if a second finding of non-compliance is made, the court shall consider this to be grounds for a change of custody to the non-custodial parent. In all hearings regarding denial of visitation, the court shall make specific findings of fact. When making decisions regarding visitation, the court shall consider past or present domestic violence as a factor not in the best interest of the children.
In all proceedings for divorce or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child.
1976 Code §20-3-160 and §20-7-420.
If the custodial parent fails to comply with the visitation provisions in the divorce decree, the non-custodial parent may ask the Family Court, by pro se Affidavit, on forms available from the Clerk of Family Court, for a court hearing to determine whether the custodial parent should be held in contempt or the visitation provision should be modified. If the non-custodial parent refuses to return the child to the custodial parent at the end of a period of visitation, the custodial parent may ask the Family Court, by pro se Affidavit, for a hearing to determine whether the non-custodial parent should be held in contempt. Whenever either parent requests relief pursuant to this rule, the Clerk of Court shall issue a court order, called a "Rule to Show Cause," and shall attach the pro se Affidavit and a copy of the visitation order allegedly violated, directing the other person to appear in court at a specific time and date. The court hearing shall be scheduled within 30 days of the date the pro se Affidavit is filed.
Rule 27, South Carolina Family Court Rules.
The trial court may allow a non-custodial parent any visitation privileges that are reasonable and in the best interest of the child. S.D.C.L. 25-4-45.
Any party granted visitation or custody rights to a child by a court decree may request the court enter an order to show cause why the other party shall not be held in contempt of court for violation of the decree related to visitation or custody. Each violation of the custody or visitation provisions of a court decree may be punished by imprisonment in jail, not to exceed three days; by fine, not to exceed $1,000; or both. The violator may be placed on probation for a period of time, not to exceed five years. S.D.C.L. Chapter 25-4a.
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court has the power to restrict visitation by the non-custodial parent if the court finds that visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health. If the court finds that the non-custodial parent has physically or emotionally abused the child, the court may require that visitation be supervised or prohibited until such abuse has ceased or until there is not reasonable likelihood that such abuse will recur. TCA §36-6-301.
Texas statutes have done away with the traditional concepts of "custody" and "visitation," replacing them with new concepts of "Conservatorship" and "possession." If a parent is not appointed by the court as a managing conservator of a child, then the court shall appoint that parent to be a possessory conservator, entitling that parent to time of possession with the child, unless such an appointment is not in the best interests of the child or parental possession would endanger the physical or emotional welfare of the child. Texas statutes contain a "standard possession order" which lists a recommended minimum schedule of possessory time by a parent who does no physically reside with the child. There is a rebuttable presumption that the standard possession order provides reasonable minimum possession of a child and is in the best interest of the child. The standard order applies to children over the age of three. The court shall issue an order appropriate under the circumstances for possession of a child less than three years of age. The standard possession order shall take effect on the child's third birthday. The parties may agree to vary from the periods of possession in the standard possession order. V.T.C.A., Family Code §153.191-.317.
It is the expressed intent of the Utah legislature to promote visitation because of a belief that it is in the best interest of the child to have frequent and continuing access to each parent, and that it is in the best interest of the parents to have frequent and continuing access with the child, and that is in the best interest of the child to have both parents actively involved in parenting the child.
Utah laws provide a minimum schedule for visitation with specific recommendations for days and times for visitation, based on ages of the children. The schedule is considered the minimum amount of visitation, with additional time based upon the circumstances and what is in the best interest of the children.
Whenever the child travels with either parent, the other parent will be provided with travel dates, destinations, places where the child or traveling parent can be reached, and the name and phone number of an available third person who knows the child's location.
When either parent moves from the state of Utah or 150 miles or more from the residence specified in the court decree the parent shall provide reasonable advance written notice of the intended relocation to the other parent. Either party or the court may schedule a hearing to review the visitation schedule and make appropriate orders in light of the intended relocation. Upon the motion of any party, the court may order the parent intending to move to pay the costs of transportation for 1) at least one visit per year with the other parent; and 2) any number of additional visits as determined equitable by the court. Upon the motion of any party, the court may order uninterrupted visitation with the non-custodial parent for a minimum of 30 days during extended visitation unless the court finds it is not in the best interest of the child. UCA 30-3-32 to 30-3-37.
The Vermont courtS award "parental rights and responsibilities" and "parent-child contact" instead of the traditional "custody" and "visitation." Parent-child contact means the right of the parent to have visitation with the child if the child is not living with that parent, pursuant to the division of parental rights and responsibilities. The extent of parent-child contact shall be based upon the court's determination of what is in the best interest of the child. Any agreement between the parents which divides or shares parental rights and responsibilities, including parent-child contact, shall be presumed to be in the best interest of the child. The court shall refuse to approve the agreement only if the court finds that the agreement is not in the best interest of the child, or if the agreement was not reached voluntarily. If a non-custodial parent who is ordered to pay child support or alimony fails to pay child support or alimony, the custodial parent shall not refuse to honor the non-custodial parent's visitation rights. Likewise, refusal to honor visitation rights is not a justification for failure to pay court-ordered child support or alimony. If the custodial parent refuses to honor visitation rights without proper cause, the court may restore the amount of visitation improperly denied. The court shall conduct a hearing within 30 days of service of any motion to enforce visitation rights. 15 VSA Sections 664-670; and 15 VSA Section 668(a).
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. In determining an award of visitation rights, the court should consider the same factors which make up the best interests of the child for purposes of a custody determination. CV §20-107.2.
The laws of Washington have done away with the former concepts of custody and visitation. Now both parents are required to submit proposed parenting plans. If the court does not accept the plans submitted by the parties, the court can make its own permanent parenting plan which incorporates a residential schedule that designates in which parent's home each minor child shall reside on given days of the year. RCW §26.09.184.
The court has the power to order visitation rights for any person other than a parent when visitation may serve the best interest of the child. RCW §26.09.240.
In every action where visitation is awarded, the court shall specify a schedule for visitation by the non-custodial parent. Upon motion of any party, a decree or order which does not provide a specific visitation schedule shall be modified to include a specific schedule of visitation by the non-custodial parent.
The court may order a visitation adjustment policy as a remedy to resolve any dispute concerning visitation rights. A visitation adjustment policy shall be applied to the following visitation violations: 1) where a non-custodial parent has been wrongfully denied visitation; or 2) where a custodial parent has had his or her right to custody infringed upon by the actions of a non-custodial parent who has abused or exceeded his or her right of visitation. Visitation shall be adjusted to compensate for the same type and duration as the visitation that was denied by the custodial parent or exceeded by the non-custodial parent. The court shall thereafter keep an accurate record of alleged visitation violations. Subsequent claims of violations shall be reported promptly to the court. Notice of the violation shall be given promptly to the other parent. Visitation shall be adjusted accordingly. A Complaint of visitation violation may be treated as a civil or criminal contempt proceeding. WV Code §48A-5-7.
In all proceedings for dissolution of marriage or legal separation, the court shall grant visitation as will enable the child and the non-custodial parent to maintain a child to parent relationship that will be in the best interest of the child. The court has the power to restrict visitation by the non-custodial parent if the court finds that visitation is likely to endanger the child's physical or emotional health or impair the child's emotional development. A parent's failure to pay child support because of the parent's inability to do so shall not be sufficient cause for denial of visitation. The court shall modify an Order granting or denying visitation rights whenever modification would serve the best interest of the child. if the court finds that a person has been wrongfully deprived of duly established right to visitation, the court shall order the custodial parent to permit additional visits to compensate for the visitation of which the person was deprived.
Wisconsin law replaces visitation with the concept of "physical placement." When the court makes an Order regarding custody of a child, the court shall allocate periods of physical placement between the parties in accordance with the best interest of the child, and in reliance upon the factors making up the best-interest standard.
Upon petition by a grandparent, a great-grandparent, step-parent, or person who has maintained a relationship similar to a parent-child relationship, the court may grant reasonable visitation rights if visitation is in the best interest of the child.
Wis. Stat. §767.24 and 767.245.
The court may make such award of visitation as is appropriate to promote the best interest of the child. The court shall: 1) order visitation and specific detail to promote compliance; 2) provide for the allocation of the costs of transporting the child for purposes of visitation; and 3) require either parent who plans to change his or her home, city, or state of residence, to give written notice 15 days prior to the move, both to the other parent and to the clerk of court stating the date and destination of the move.
At any time after the filing of an action for divorce, the court may require divorcing parents to attend appropriate classes about how to lessen the impact of divorce on their children. W.S. 20-2-113.

References: §25
 §3100
 §14
 §46
 §728
 §61
 §571
 §32
 §23
 §403
 Art. 136
 §752
 §1
 §9
 §28
 §452
 §240
 §241
 §50
 §14
 §109
 §20
 §20
 §36
 §153
 §20
 §26
 §26
 §48
 §767