Source: https://es.scribd.com/document/49441279/Notice-of-Appeal-From-Illegal-Hearing-Order
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 11:38:55+00:00

Document:
Albertelli Law's Wrongful "foreclosure action"
First Amendment Foundation Motion to Intervene - HSBC v. Lopez .
4. The purported “02/22/2011 order” arose from an unlawful and previously cancelled hearing.
authority to “deny” Jennifer Franklin-Prescott’s moot motions to dismiss & enjoin.
CORRECTION OF THE DISPOSITION RECORD”.
concealed that “BankUnited’s” robo-signed sham affidavits were null and void.
of correspondence and pleadings evidencing said fraud on the Court.
Prescott’s [moot] motion(s) in her absence and without any authority.
responds to the fraud on the Court and retired Judge Daniel R. Monaco.
and/or real interest as conclusively evidenced by the file records.
“BankUnited’s” lack of standing and any entitlement to any trial.
15. Because of the devastating New Zealand earthquake, Franklin-Prescott is unavailable.
Monaco, who presides over the notorious 20th Circuit “rocket docket”.
said fundamental right to benefit “BankUnited”.
c. Vague and ambiguous “court times”.
admissible evidence of any genuine executed note existed on the record.
record in the known absence of any note evidence.
execution, no notarial acknowledgment, no recording, and no contractual obligation.
21. Here no mortgage could possibly secure that which had been proven not to exist.
day, this equated to less than 30 seconds per case.
explained by any reasonable person, judge or juror in Monaco’s shoes.
Pacific. A national emergency was declared after the devastating NZ earthquake.
Franklin-Prescott cannot leave because of said emergency and will therefore be unavailable.
Hereby, Franklin-Prescott gives again notice of her unavailability.
against “BankUnited’s” fraud on the court.
trust Judge Monaco, said Circuit, and said “rocket docket” sham proceedings.
however, said document identified lawfully seized “BankUnited, FSB” as the "lender".
also identified bankrupt “BankUnited, FSB” as the "lender."
lack of standing, answered, and filed a motion to dismiss.
31. This action was disposed, because BankUnited had failed to state any cause action.
whether BankUnited actually ever had standing to foreclose on the mortgage.
“16. Plaintiff owns and holds the note and mortgage.” See COUNT II.
mortgage and/or sue as a matter of law. Accordingly, the action was disposed on 08/12/2010.
foreclose the purported note and mortgage.
as a ‘holder’.” See also Adams v. Madison Realty & Dev. Inc., 853 F.2d 163, 166 (3d Cir.
and its indorsement by the holder.
38. The Second District confronted a similar situation in BAC Funding Consortium, Inc.
evidence establishing U.S. Bank's standing to foreclose the note and mortgage." Id. at 939.
"required to prove that it validly held the note and mortgage it sought to foreclose." Id.
purchase of the debt nor any other evidence of an effective transfer to “BankUnited”.
of lis pendens is one year from filing. § 48.23(2), Fla. Stat. (2010).
be proven under the Evidence Code.
of the loss/destruction had been uinknown. See UCC §§ 3-309; 3-305.
proven by the conclusive evidence on file.
from appearing in this disposed action.
on February 24, 2011, Pacific Time.
The Florida Bar, New York Times, et al.
Live complaint management Manage customer complaints live Retain & recover unhappy customers customerradar.
BASS MORTGAGE LOAN ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-CB5, APPELLEES.
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Sarasota County; Robert B. Bennett, Jr., Judge.
F. Malcolm Cunningham, Jr., and Amy Fisher of The Cunningham Law Firm, P.A., West Palm Beach, for Appellant.
Cindy L. Runyan of Florida Default Law Group, Lp, Tampa, for Appellee U.S. Bank National Association.
No appearance for Appellees Ginelle M. Jean-Jacques and Serge Jean-Jacques, Jr.
summary judgment was prematurely entered, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
attached an "Adjustable Rate Rider" to the complaint, which also identified Fremont as the "lender."
dismissed based on this lack of standing.
render it admissible into evidence.
had standing to foreclose on the note or mortgage.
judgment of foreclosure in favor of U.S. Bank. BAC now appeals, contending that the summary judgment was improper because U.S.
Bank never established its standing to foreclose.
ex rel. Seaman v. Bon Secours-Maria Manor Nursing Care Ctr., Inc., 928 So. 2d 1272, 1274 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006) (quoting Fla. R. Civ. P.
to make it appear to a certainty that no answer which the defendant might properly serve could present a genuine issue of fact."
Settecasi v. Bd. of Pub. Instruction of Pinellas County, 156 So. 2d 652, 654 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963); see also W. Fla. Cmty. Builders, Inc.
permitted to answer the complaint.
is the holder of the note and mortgage or the holder's representative. See Mortgage Elec. Registration Sys., Inc. v. Azize, 965 So.
mortgage as a matter of law.
and mortgage, and thus, at this point, U.S. Bank was not entitled to summary judgment in its favor.
and the contents of the exhibit to the complaint and other filings, U.S. Bank failed to meet this burden.
motion in a foreclosure proceeding.
judgment of foreclosure and remand for further proceedings.
ALTENBERND and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.
regarding “BankUnited’s” fraud on the Court and unauthorized “02/22/2011 hearing”.
failed to rationally explain the errors and contradictions on the record.
Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday dockets before Judge Daniel Monaco.
These timeslots will be in 5 minute increments.
been amended on “02/08/2011”. See “AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING 02/14/11”.
hearing. Said allegation is erroneous. See 02/21/2011 Docket.
enjoin”, which however are known to be MOOT after the 08/12/2010 disposition.
c. Erroneous parties such as, e.g., “Pedro Luis Licourt”; see 02/08/11 filings.
d. Any notice of appearance.
“robo-signed” documents for unlawful purposes of defrauding the alleged “defendants”.
“BankUnited”, and the wrongful action was disposed. See evidence on file.
11. The wrongful foreclosure action had been disposed on 08/12/2010 for lack of standing.
standing and no right to sue “Jennifer Franklin Prescott”.
12. I have been in the Pacific and given notice(s) of my unavailability. See Docket.
and/or competent evidence of any debt and/or note.
was not entitled to sue nor to any hearing.
original notice must be timely filed with the Clerk of Court.” Id.
UNAUTHORIZED ATTORNEY “ANDREW LEE FIVECOAT”, ESQ.
not identified as “lender” and was not any note holder and/or owner.
to file more perjurious papers.
“defendant” homeowner violates due process.
“BankUnited” to commit fraud over and over again.
correspondence and pleadings evidencing the fraud on the Court have been utterly ignored.
Retired “temporary” Judge Hon. D. R. Monaco does not even have any assistant.
judges who need the extra money to sign off on prima facie fraud.
“plaintiff”, and “BankUnited” had no right to sue and/or schedule any hearing.
Docket USA, Ex Rel et al. v. USA et al.

References: v. 
 v. 
 § 48
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.