Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/080923.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 02:36:32+00:00

Document:
NETFLIX INC: Appeal Court Affirms Settlement Order in "Chavez"
NYMEX HOLDINGS: Suit Over CME Group Sale Still Pending in Del.
PXRE GROUP: Consolidated Securities Suit Still Pending in N.Y.
QUEST SOFTWARE: Securities Fraud Lawsuit Still Pending in Calif.
SOUTHERN STAR: Kansas Court Mulls Intervention Bid in "Price I"
BANKUNITED FINANCIAL: Brower Piven Files Securities Suit in Fla.
CANADIAN IMPERIAL: Coughlin Stoia Files Securities Suit in N.Y.
SSGA INTERMEDIATE: Brower Piven Files Securities Suit in N.Y.
class periods as specified in the complaints.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5.
the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Company, et al., Case No. 0:07-cv-61057-JIC," filed in the U.S.
Estates development in Salida, CourtHouse News Service reports.
The suit is "Leonel Aguilar et al. v. Anderson Homes, Case No.
business practices, in violation of Cal. Bus. & Prof.
-- certification of the class pursuant to Cal. Code Civ.
Company, et al., Case No. CV 08-06149 PSG," filed in the U.S.
writes for Contra Costa Times.
the state's public colleges and universities.
promise to seek citizenship as soon as they are able.
students who pay higher fees.
including two children of former San Diego congressman, Rep.
started college. "It's never passed the smell test."
year. About 10% are believed to be U.S. citizens.
"This goes well beyond post-secondary education benefits," Mr.
Fund v. CIT Group Inc. et al., Case No. 1:08-cv-06613-BSJ-THK,"
repaid and should have been written off.
other relief, unspecified damages and interest.
District of New York, Barbara S. Jones, presiding.
(g) should be subjected to payment of punitive damages.
proposed class period of March 30, 2007, through May 8, 2007.
class period of March 1, 2007, through May 8, 2007.
Biologics License Application for Provenge.
complaint in this action through the entry of final judgment.
conduct, as well as other questions of law and fact.
The suit is "Kieth Berry, et al. v. Future Ford Inc., Case No.
the State of California for the County of Sacramento.
to the company's Aug. 11, 2008 Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
company's stock between Feb. 9, 2005, and Sept. 30, 2005.
company's former President and Chief Executive Officer.
the issues raised in the class-action lawsuit.
District of Connecticut, Judge Vanessa L. Bryant, presiding.
to the cell phones of consumers nationwide.
will be made to each person who received such a text message.
represents an exceptional result for consumers," explained Mr.
as well," commented Mr. Kolton.
respect to any future mass mobile marketing campaigns.
class members to receive text messages.
financial results, prospects and condition.
matter in its Aug. 11, 2008 Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
of Florida, Judge Donald L. Graham, presiding.
action lawsuit entitled "In re: Loral Space ERISA Litigation."
Ltd. (Old Loral) and participants in the Old Loral Savings Plan.
re: Loral Space ERISA Litigation case."
company's board of directors, including Bernard L. Schwartz.
and whose accounts included investments in Old Loral stock.
will their claim against Old Loral exceed $22 million.
Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
Communications Inc. (New Loral) has expired.
securities class-action lawsuit styled "Jonathan Crowell v.
Mannatech, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:07-CV-00238-K,"
executive officer, Samuel L. Caster.
inclusive, and who were damaged thereby.
company's president and chief operating officer; and Stephen D.
Fenstermacher, its chief financial officer.
Zeller against the company, Mr. Caster, Mr. Persinger, and Mr.
2007, the consolidated action was transferred to the U.S.
was transferred to the docket of Judge Ed Kinkeade.
appointed local counsel for the putative class.
and the subsequent drop in the company's stock price.
the claims in the litigation.
period Aug. 10, 2004, through July 30, 2007.
District of Texas, Judge Ed Kinkeade, presiding.
the dismissal of a securities fraud class-action lawsuit.
common stock being artificially inflated.
the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the U.S.
company had begun "commercial sales" of "Microsoft-Branded"
closing at $20.32 per share.
plaintiffs allege, the units were not Microsoft branded.
the time period April 13, 2007 through April 17, 2007."
temporarily inflate the company's stock price.
lifting the stay of discovery.
the company's Aug. 11, 2008 Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
The suit is "Kou v. Medis Technologies, Ltd., et al., Case No.
Southern District of New York, Judge Paul A. Crotty, presiding.
lawsuit filed against Miva, Inc. -- formerly Findwhat.com, Inc.
-- and certain of its officers and directors before the U.S.
District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
individual defendants violated Section 10(b) of the U.S.
material weaknesses in its internal controls.
unspecified damages and other relief.
Act and also served answers to the complaints.
complaint, which they filed on Jan. 17, 2006.
or, in the alternative, for reconsideration.
scienter in light of intervening precedent.
that could be brought against another individual defendant.
and the discovery phase of the lawsuit is presently underway.
and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended June 30, 2008.
The suit is "In re MIVA, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No.
Middle District of Florida, Judge John E. Steele presiding.
Barker, Rodems & Cook, P.A.
Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, P.A.
March 10, 2006, against the company and Advertising.com, Inc.
2007, and the motion is currently pending.
in a separate case, captioned "Lane's Gifts LLC, et al. v.
Yahoo! Inc., et al.," in Arkansas.
approval of the New York court.
Court for the Southern District of New York, Judge John G.
further appeal was made in connection with the decision.
either the 1, 2 or 3 DVDs at-a-time unlimited program.
according to its Aug. 11, 2008 Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
Court for City and County of San Francisco.
coffee, sugar, cocoa and cotton.
its board of directors and CME Group.
identical to those in the Capozza action.
preventing the consummation of the Proposed Transaction.
and its directors moved to dismiss the second amended complaint.
CME Group filed a similar motion.
the Court granted that motion, and discovery commenced.
2008, for the Preliminary Injunction Motion.
vigorously against the plaintiffs' allegations.
internal controls with respect revenue recognition.
period from May 2, 2006, and April 17, 2007.
consolidated complaint. On July 1, 2008, Judge Christina A.
for the Central District of California, Judge Christina A.
Ontario Superior Court of Justice.
three fiscal quarters of 2007.
without merit and intends to vigorously dispute the Claim.
Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Securities Litigation Case No.
Trust, Inc. (Wells REIT) -- as a defendant.
closing of the internalization transaction.
Commission on Feb. 26, 2007.
certain directors and officers of Wells REIT.
granted the defendants' motion to transfer venue to the U.S.
designate the class lead plaintiff and class co-lead counsel.
Piedmont officer as an individual defendant.
expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont.
the defendants as consideration for Internalization.
Charles A. Pannell, Jr, presiding.
damages, as well as other forms of relief.
lawsuits have been consolidated into one proceeding.
during the period starting Nov. 9, 2001, through July 3, 2006.
an amended complaint due Dec. 1, 2007.
it related to the company and other individual defendants.
review. This request was denied by the court.
filed its answer to the second amended class-action complaint.
The suit is "Middlesex Retirement System v. Quest Software Inc.
et al., Case No. 2:06-cv-06863-DOC-RNB," filed in the U.S.
845 3rd Ave., 12th Fl.
for the Phoenix Business Journal.
certified by the FCC," he said.
both speed and red-light cameras.
rollout of 100 speed cameras throughout the state.
U.S. The lawsuit does not specify the damages it seeks.
money back, which is why the lawsuit seeks class action status.
contracts) sold to issuers of municipal bonds.
Litigation issued an order transferring the cases to the U.S.
10(b) and 20(a) and Rule 10b-5 of the Exchange Act.
Jan. 16, 2002, and seek unspecified monetary damages.
about its products and business.
consolidated amended complaint on various grounds.
dismissal motion, and later denied the request.
law firm of Moulton & Gans as lead counsel.
the class representative, the class representative withdrew.
court entered an order dismissing the cases.
company's motion for recovery of attorneys' fees.
Amended Complaint previously filed against the defendants.
the District of Massachusetts, Judge Mark L. Wolf, presiding.
including Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
plaintiffs continue to seek the certification of a class.
motion on April 1, 2005.
unknown when the court will rule on the pending motions.
plaintiffs in the purported class action, "Will Price, et al. v.
they have obtained from or measured for the plaintiffs.
argument on this motion on April 1, 2005.
three months from the announcement of the program.
company's Aug. 11, 2008 Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
CMH/BRP," on April 4, 2006.
-- TNS' agreement with the Pepsi Bottling Group, Inc.
to reach a settlement resolving the lawsuit.
of expenses of plaintiff's lead counsel not to exceed $50,000.
of class members relating to the action.
settlement agreement after a fairness hearing on June 20, 2008.
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia.
Plaintiff, v. Jeffrey H. Margolis, Donald J. Lothrop, Thomas B.
Johnson, Paul F. Lefort, Jerry P. Widman, Nancy H. Handel, L.
Merger Sub, Inc., and The TriZetto Group Inc., Defendants, C.A.
plaintiff's counsel's fees and experts' fees.
claims as those alleged in the Simonetti Litigation.
Action was stayed in favor of the Simonetti Litigation.
Others Similarly Situated, v. Jeffrey H. Margolis, et al., C.A.
California Action, the "Merger Litigation").
a preliminary injunction enjoining the proposed Merger.
stockholders on or about July 3, 2008.
voting on the Merger at the Special Meeting.
the Stipulation of Settlement to be submitted to the Court.
to name Classic Affairs as a party defendant.
The parties have attempted, via mediation, to resolve this case.
is presently expected in the first half of 2009.
the Clubs and the management of non-owned adult nightclubs.
class-action lawsuit captioned "Crystal Alexander, et al. v.
ZipRealty," which was filed against ZipRealty, Inc.
the payment of minimum wages and overtime.
data, such as asking prices, home layouts and other features.
participating member agents to facilitate broker cooperation.
federal Fair Labor Standards Act.
all related to the same conduct.
penalties, injunctive relief, and attorneys' fees and costs.
period between April 18, 2006, and June 18, 2008, inclusive.
to consumers and businesses located primarily in Florida.
truth began to emerge, the value of BankUnited's stock declined.
all U.S. purchasers of the securities of CIBC, and all U.S.
government, and institutional clients in the U.S. and Canada.
collateralized debt obligations consisting of U.S.
purchasers of CIBC securities during the class period.
violations of federal securities laws.
representing an 8.5% decline in value.
The Brualdi Law Firm, P.C.
issued in connection with the Fund's initial public offerings.
disclosures caused the price of the Funds' shares to decline.
from their exposure to mortgage-backed assets.
May 23, 2007, and November 8, 2007, inclusive.
production shortfalls with its Java Monster drink line.
of 1934 and the Securities Act of 1933.
the Harris Microwave Communications Division.
reports from 2005 through the present.
violations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
share on much heavier than usual trading volume.
for violations of federal securities laws.
and illiquid auction rate securities.
otherwise acquired the securities of Novatel Wireless, Inc.
between February 5, 2007, and August 19, 2008, inclusive.
Court for the Southern District of California.
thereby artificially inflating the price of Novatel securities.
solutions for the mobile communications market worldwide.
August 20, 2008, at $6.29 per share, on unusually heavy volume.
2007, and June 25, 2008.
extraordinary trading volume in excess of 10.8 million shares.
purchasers of Oshkosh common stock during the Class Period.
dollar-weighted average maturity between three and ten years."
invest "at least 80% of its total assets in debt instruments"
The Rosen Law Firm filed a class action lawsuit in the U.S.
the period from February 4, 2008, through June 9, 2008.
price of Synchronoss stock has dropped, damaging investors.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.