Source: http://cal-span.org/unipage/index.php?site=cal-span&meeting=3059&owner=CARB
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 00:42:43+00:00

Document:
Thursday, April 25, 2019 @ 9:00 a.m.
The California Air Resources Board (CARB or Board) will consider amendments to the Red Sticker Program for Off-Highway Recreation Vehicles (OHRV). OHRV are primarily used in public State parks and federally designated lands, as well as on private tracks. The goal of the proposed amendments is to end the current red sticker program which allows for CARB certification of OHRV that do not meet emissions standards. The amendments include provisions that end the certification of new red sticker vehicles, end riding restrictions on public lands for existing red sticker vehicles, establish new OHRV emissions standards, and increase incentives for fleet emissions averaging and zero emission OHRV. The proposed amendments are intended to cause emissions reductions from OHRV in California while ensuring availability for California dealers and riders..
The Board will consider the proposed amendments to the Certification of Vapor Recovery Systems on Cargo Tanks Regulation that establish a regulatory mechanism to periodically evaluate program costs and subsequently adjust the certification fee to recover these costs, per the authority under the Health and Safety Code section 41962. In addition, the proposed amendments will establish: (1) a requirement for a public meeting prior to adjusting fees, (2) an effective date of January 1 following a fee revision, (3) the cost of replacement decals, and (4) procedures to request a certification fee refund.
The Board will hear an update on CARB's 2018 climate and air quality collaborations with foreign jurisdictions and priorities for international engagement for 2019.
American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, et al. v. Jane O’Keeffe, et al., U.S. District Court (D. Ore. Portland), Case No. 3:15-CV-00467; Plaintiffs’ appeal, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, Case No. 15-35834; Plaintiffs’ petitions for Certiorari in United States Supreme Court, Case No. 18-881.
Mexichem Fluor, Inc. v. U.S. EPA, (D.C. Cir. 2017) 866 F. 3d 451 (U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, Case Nos. 15-1328 and 15-1329).
Sowinski v. California Air Resources Board, et al., United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. 8:15-cv-02123.
John R. Lawson Rock & Oil, Inc. v. California Air Resources Board, and Richard Corey, Superior Court of California, County of Fresno, Central Division, Case No. 19CEGG00331.
Air Resources Board v. Key Disposal, Inc. and John Katangian, Los Angeles Superior Court, Case No. BC650014.
In re Pacific Gas and Electric Company, U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of California, Case No. 19-30089.
California Air Resources Board vs. Cascade Sierra, Sacramento Superior Court, Case No. 34-2017-00223510.
John Mahan v. California Air Resources Board, Sacramento County Superior Court, Case No. 34-2016-80002416.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.