Source: http://te.sfedu.ru/arkhiv-nomerov/2018/150-nomer-2/2488-institutsionalnaya-teoriya-planirovaniya-kak-obshchaya-teoriya-planirovaniya-sostoyanie-i-vozmozhnoe-razvitie.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 04:19:56+00:00

Document:
Тамбовцев, В. Л. (2014). Общественные блага и общественные интересы: есть ли связь? // Вопросы экономики, 11, 25–40.
Тамбовцев, В. Л. (2014). Экономическая теория неформальных институтов. М.: РГПресс.
Тамбовцев, В. Л. (2017). Планирование и оппортунизм // Вопросы экономики, 1, 22–39.
Швецов, А. Н. (2017). Стратегическое планирование по-российски: торжество централизованного бюрократического выбора // ЭКО, 8, 114–127.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior // Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.
Alexander, E. (1992). A Transaction Cost Theory of Planning // Journal of the American Planning Association, 58(2), 190–200.
Alexander, E. R. (2002). Planning Rights: Toward Normative Criteria for Evaluating Plans // International Planning Studies, 7(3), 191–212.
Alexander, E. R. (2015). 70 Years’ Planning Theory: A Post-postmodernist Perspective // Scienze Regionali, 14(1), 5–18.
Alexander, E. R. (1998). Doing the ‘Impossible’: Notes for a General Theory of Planning // Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 25(5), 667–680.
Alexander, E. R. (2007). Planning rights and their Implications // Planning Theory, 6(2), 112–126.
Alexander, E. R. (2007). Institutionalist Perspectives on Planning: Why? Where? How? pр. 37–59 / In: Verma N. (Ed.). Institutions and Planning: An Analogical Inquiry. Oxford: Elsevier.
Allmendinger, P. (2002). Towards a post-positivist typology of planning theory // Planning Theory, 1(1), 77–99.
Bromley, D. W. (1989). Property Relations and Economic Development: The Other Land Reform // World Development, 17(6), 867–877.
Cheshire, P. and Sheppard, S. (2002). The welfare economics of land use planning // Journal of Urban Economics, 52(2), 242–269.
Connell, D. J. and Daoust-Filiatrault L.-A. (2017). Better Than Good: Three Dimensions of Plan Quality // Journal of Planning Education and Research. DOI: 10.1177/0739456X17709501.
Connell, D. J. (2010). Schools of Planning Thought: Exploring Differences through Similarities // International Planning Studies, 15(4), 269–280.
Donaghy, K. P. and Hopkins, L. D. (2006). Coherentist Theories of Planning are Possible and Useful // Planning Theory, 5(2), 173–202.
Ellickson, R. C. (1977). Alternatives to Zoning: Covenants, Nuisance Rules and Fines as Land Use Controls // University of Chicago Law Review, 40(4), 681–781.
Ellis, G. (2004). Discourses of objection: towards an understanding of third-party rights in planning // Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 36(9), 1549–1570.
Faludi, A. (1973). Planning Theory. Oxford: Pergamon. Fawaz, M. and Moumtaz, N. (2017). Of property and planning: a brief introduction // Planning Theory & Practice, 18(3), 345–350.
Feldman, M. M. A. (1995). Regime and regulation in substantive planning theory // Planning Theory (Franco Angeli Series), 14, 65–94.
Fischel, W. (1978). A Property Rights Approach to Municipal Zoning // Land Economics, 54(1), 64–81.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2002). Bringing Power to Planning Research: One Researcher’s Praxis Story // Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21(4), 353–366.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2004). Phronetic planning research: Theoretical and methodological considerations // Planning Theory and Practice, 5(3), 283–306.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2009). Survival of the unfittest: Why the worst infrastructure gets built – And what we can do about it // Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 25(3), 344–367.
Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday-Anchor.
Galloway, T. D. and Mahayni, R. G. (1977). Planning theory in retrospect: the process of paradigm change // Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 43(1), 62–71.
Gollwitzer, P. M., Fujita, K. and Oettingen, G. (2004). Planning and the Implementation of Goals, рр. 211–228 / In: Baumeister, R. F., and Vohs, K. D. (Eds.) Handbook of selfregulation: Research, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press.
Goodspeed, R. (2016). The Death and Life of Collaborative Planning Theory // Urban Planning, 1(4), 1–5.
Guyadeen, D. (2018). Do Practicing Planners Value Plan Quality? Insights from a Survey of Planning Professionals in Ontario, Canada // Journal of the American Planning Association, 84(1), 21–32.
Guyadeen, D. and Seasons, M. (2016). Plan evaluation: Challenges and directions for future research // Planning Practice & Research, 31(2), 215–228.
Hall, P. A. and Taylor, R. C. R. (1996). Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms // Political Studies, 44(5), 936–957.
Harris, B. (1997). The Theory of Planning and of its Profession // Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 24(4), 483–489.
Healey, P. (1992). Planning through debate: the communicative turn in planning theory // Town Planning Review, 63(2), 143–162.
Healey, P. and Williams, R. (1993). European planning systems: diversity and convergence // Urban Studies, 30(4–5), 701–720. Healey, P. (2003). Collaborative Planning in Perspective // Planning Theory, 2(2), 101– 123.
Healey, P., McDougall, G. and Thomas, M. J. (Eds.) (1982). Planning theory: prospects for the 1980s. Oxford: Pergamon.
Hefetz, A. and Warner, M. (2007). Beyond the market versus planning dichotomy: Understanding privatisation and its reverse in US cities // Local Government Studies, 4(33), 555–572.
Hohfeld, W. N. (1917). Fundamental legal conceptions as applied in judicial reasoning // Yale Law Journal, 26(8), 710–770. DOI: 10.2307/786270.
Hudson, B. M., Galloway, T. D. and Kaufman, J. L. (1979). Comparison of current planning theories: counterparts and contradictions // Journal of the American Planning Association, 4(45), 387–398.
Innes, J. and Booher, D. (1999). Consensus Building and Complex Adaptive Systems – A Framework for Evaluating Collaborative Planning // Journal of the American Planning Association, 65(4), 412–23.
Janin Rivolin, U. (2012). Planning Systems as Institutional Technologies: a Proposed Conceptualization and the Implications for Comparison // Planning Practice and Research, 27(1), 63–85.
Kim, A. M. (2012). The Evolution of the Institutional Approach in Planning, pp. 69–86 / In: Crane R. and Weber R. (Eds.) Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning. New York: Oxford University Press.
Klein, P. G. (2000). New Institutional Economics, pp. 456–489 / In: Bouckaert B. and De Geest G. (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, vol. 1. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Klosterman, R. E. (1985). Arguments For and Against Planning // Town Planning Review, 56(1), 5–20.
Kostova, T., Roth, K. and Dacin, M. T. (2008). Institutional Theory in the Study of Multinational Corporations: A Critique and New Directions // Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 994–1006.
Kumar, A. (2011). Planning Rights: A Review and Discussion // Journal of Institute of Town Planners, 8(4), 21–30.
Lai, L. W. С. (2005). Neo-Institutional Economics and Planning Theory // Planning Theory, 4(1), 7–19.
Lai, L. W. C. (1994) The Economics of Land Use Zoning: A Literature Review and Analysis of the Work of Coase // Town Planning Review, 65(1), 77–98.
Lai, S.-K. and Han, H. (2014). Behavioral Planning Theory, pp. 265–272 / In: Wang J. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Business Analytics and Optimization. Hershey: IGI Global.
Lai, L. (2010). A model of planning by contract: integrating comprehensive state planning, freedom of contract, public participation and fidelity // Town Planning Review, 81(6), 647–674.
Lane, M. B. (2005). Public Participation in Planning: An Intellectual History // Australian Geographer, 36(3), 283–299.
Lawrence, T. B. and Shadnam, M. (2008). Institutional Theory, pp. 2288–2293 / In: Donsbach W. (Ed.). The International Encyclopedia of Communication. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
Lee, D. B., Jr. (1981). Land Use Planning as a Response to Market Failure, pp. 149–164 / In: de Neufville J. I. (Ed.). The Land Use Policy Debate in the United States. Boston: Springer.
Legacy, C. (2017). Is there a crisis of participatory planning? // Planning Theory, 16(4), 425–442.
Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The Science of «Muddling Through» // Public Administration Review, 2(19), 79–88.
Lord, A. (2014). Towards a non-theoretical understanding of planning // Planning Theory, 13(1), 26–43.
Lord, A., Mair, M., Sturzaker, J. and Jones, P. (2017). The planners’ dream goes wrong? Questioning citizen-centred planning // Local Government Studies, 43(3), 344–363.
Mandelbaum, S. J. (1979). A Complete General Theory of Planning Is Impossible // Policy Sciences, 11(1), 59–71.
Mandelbaum, S. J. (1985). The Institutional Focus of Planning Theory // Journal of Planning Education and Research, 5(1), 3–9.
Metzger, J., Soneryd, L. and Hallström, K. T. (2017). ‘Power’ is that which remains to be explained: Dispelling the ominous dark matter of critical planning studies // Planning Theory, 16(2), 203–222.
Misra, S. K. and Puri, V. K. (1986). Economics of Development and Planning. Mumbai: Himalaya Publishing House.
Moulaert, F. (2005). Institutional economics and planning theory: a partnership between ostriches? // Planning Theory, 4(1), 21–32.
Mukhija, V. (2005). Collective Action and Property Rights: A Planner’s Critical Look at the Dogma of Private Property // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29(4), 972–983.
Nelson, R. H. (1977). Zoning and Property Rights: An Analysis of the American System of Land Use Regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Othengrafen, F. (2014). The Concept of Planning Culture: Analysing How Planners Construct Practical Judgements in a Culturised Context // International Journal of E-Planning Research, 3(2), 1–17.
Othengrafen, F. and Reimer, M. (2013). The Embeddedness of Planning in Cultural Contexts: Theoretical Foundations for the Analysis of Dynamic Planning Cultures // Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 45(6), 1269–1284.
Oxley, M., Brown, T., Nadin, V., Qu, L., Tummers, L. and Fernández-Maldonado, A. M. (2009). Review of European Planning Systems. Leicester: De Montfort University.
Poulton, M. C. (1991). The Case for a Positive Theory of Planning. Part 1: What is Wrong with Planning Theory? // Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 18(2), 225–232.
Sager, T. (2001). Positive Theory of Planning: The Social Choice Approach // Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 33(4), 629–647.
Sanyal, B. (Ed.) (2005). Comparative Planning Cultures. New York: Routledge.
Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centered Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Schloger, E. and Ostrom, E. (1992). Property-rights regimes and natural resources: A conceptual analysis // Land Economics, 68(3), 249–262.
Schmidt, S. and Buehler, R. (2007). The planning process in the US and Germany: a comparative analysis // International Planning Studies, 12(1), 55–75.
Sorensen, A. (2017). New Institutionalism and Planning Theory, pp. 250–263 / In: Gunder, M., Madanipour, A., and Watson, V. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of Planning Theory. New York: Routledge.
Tambovtsev, V. (2011). Types of Economic Action // Social Sciences, 42(2), 3–17.
Tasan-Kok, T. and Baeten, G. (Eds.) (2012). Contradictions of Neoliberal Planning: Cities, Policies, and Politics. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taylor, Z. (2013). Rethinking planning culture: a new institutionalist approach // Town Planning Review, 84(6), 683–702.
Thomas, M. J. (1982). The procedural theory of A Faludi, pp. 13–25 / In: Paris, C. (Ed.) Critical Readings in Planning Theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Watson, V. (2016). Shifting Approaches to Planning Theory: Global North and South // Urban Planning, 1(4), 32–41.
Webster, C. (1998) Public Choice, Pigovian and Coasian Planning Theory // Urban Studies, 35(1), 53–75.
Webster, C., Adams, D., Pearce, B., Henneberry, J. and Ward, S. V. (2005). The New Institutional Economics and the evolution of modern urban planning: Insights, issues and lessons // Town Planning Review, 76(4), 455–484.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.