Source: http://www.skeptictank.org/hs/henfil.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 07:13:57+00:00

Document:
Scientology Crime Syndicate - Latest Henson filing for comment!
Subject: Latest Henson filing for comment!
Ok, folks. Various people advised me not to post this till it was ready to be filed. I am trying to file it monday, so there is not much time for you to find the spelling and grammer and logic errors. Sorry.
And, I really appreciate the help. You may be able to recognize your contributions.
for 1.25% of that amount.
defendants will collect for the US Treasury.
1.    United States has waived sovereign immunity.
2.    Plaintiff has standing under Flast v. Cohen.
3.    Injury is not required under Flast; being a taxpayer is enough.
declaratory relief may be obtained for establishment clause cases.
Scientology as they are publicly known.
Miscavige and Marty Rathbun to then IRS Commissioner Fred T. Goldberg, Jr.
Ninth Circuit) prior to becoming Commissioner.
private investigators working for Scientology.
property of IRS agents may also have been an inducement.
detectives and frivolous (?) lawsuits . . . .
massive hole in the principle of equity and undermines its impartiality."
Scientology's well known history and tactics, all three could be involved.
limitation on taxes paid in error.  Hughes v. United States, Elias v.
and not the payment of a specific person's or corporation's taxes.
be named as a defendant.
The first case defendants cite in this section is Lugo v.
(1988) and Flast v. Cohen 392 U.S. 83, 88 S.Ct. 1942 Supreme Court (1968).
Bowin have standing, the court ruled in his favor.
Congress pursuant to Article I, Section 8 of US Constitution?
constitution grants to the Executive Branch.
E. The Service also agrees to withdraw, obsolete or supersede, Rev.
policies or practices described in paragraph B. (ii) are ever issued.
three-judge court be convened as provided in 28 U. S. C. Section 2282, 2284.
case falls within that rule.
services are not deductible charitable contributions under 170."
simple ruse of claiming they were settling litigation.
the constitution.  Comment from Bowin mentions the first two cases.
Establishment clause and were held to a different standard.
organizations.  Id., see also Exhibit 3, attached to the Complaint.
Service of any of its obligations under this Agreement . . .
E Analysis).  The IRS continues to "facially differentiate among religions"
information described in section V. paragraph A.4 of this Agreement . . .
DC District court over releasing this document as ordered in Tax Analysis v.
which could be activated at any time by "leaking" the closing agreement.
"They do. And now, you better as well!"
religion by the United States.
exempt status from recalcitrant foreign countries.
on how Revenue Ruling 93-73 and the closing agreement would fail Lemon.
threatens no excessive entanglement between church and state."
1. Purpose of Church Tax Compliance Committee.
2. Membership of Church Tax Compliance Committee.
IRS has control over who the next cardinal will be."
have a legitimate purpose depending on the subjects discussed.
C. and the certifications contained in section IV. paragraph D.
or planned corrective action with respect thereto.
while with the inner workings of Cof$.
This info came to me 3rd party, but I believe it to be true.
the conduct of government.' Flast v. Cohen, 392 U.S. at 106."
this (unfairly characterized) quote was taken.
court's jurisdiction for an adjudication on the merits.
intent of the Code--the Code is to that extent unconstitutional and void.
170 of the Internal Revenue Code.
enormous sums defending the charges).
against Scientology result in an injunction against the IRS Commissioner?
a daily basis, and are expected to increase with the progress of this suit.
Revenue Ruling 93-73, under review by the courts.
H. Keith Henson, Pro se.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v. 
 V. 
 v.

 v.