Source: https://ecologic.typepad.com/shaws_ecologic/2008/06/speaking-of-sup.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 08:16:22+00:00

Document:
The lion's share of actions affecting environmental or health care policy is under the purview of the government--and most of the time that comes down to the federal government. The previous post alluded to the fact that the regulators are immunized from the catastrophes caused by their actions, because of a horrible Supreme Court case (Dalehite v. US).
Thus, those who scandalously banned DDT--possibly the single worst regulatory policy in the nation's history--are free from any accountability. Tell that to a kid who gets busted with a few ounces of pot.
While the Framers would be shocked at the imperial power of today's Supreme Court, and certainly did not intend it to be such, the Court has become a default legislative body for virtually any cause that "escapes" the attention of Congress. Moreover, the civics curriculum is largely hagiographic in its coverage of the Court.
Like it or not, if you have an interest in government policy, you'd better get clued into the REAL Supreme Court.
Over the last few weeks, I have had occasion to study a number of so-called "landmark" cases, and when you come right down to it, most of them are essentially crapola.
In Roe v. Wade, for example, no matter what side of the abortion debate you're on, you have to be struck by one very stupid thing: If Norma McCorvey (Roe) wanted an abortion so badly, why didn't she just go to another state to get one? It was even part of the dissent that by the time the case reached the Supremes it was moot, since the baby was already born. Normally, test cases are not moot, and normally test cases do not occur because someone volunteers to purposely create one against their own interest!
In Dalehite v. US (the case cited in the previous posting) an entire law was invalidated on absurd grounds, mostly so that the government would not have to accept culpability. In dissent, Robert Jackson, a justice whom I do not particularly like, was brilliant.
Brown v. Board of Education certainly de-segregated some schools, but there was no legal theory involved, as when the same issue had come up before (Plessy v. Ferguson) the Court went the other way. Thus, it was purely political and a function of the popular culture. That's what is so pointless and funny about con law: Precedent is all important except when it isn't.
AND--Marbury v Madison, the case that started the entire business of judicial review actually did so by stating that the Court had no such authority!
Of course, no one seems to mind that the greatest constitutional question of all time--whether or not states could secede--was completely ignored until after the Civil War. But, in 1869 in yet another crummy case (Texas v. White) that relied on very shaky theory, and even then was a vigorously contested 5-3 decision, the ruling was that a state could not secede (although some exceptions were made). As you might expect, there was nothing high-minded in the details of the case. The Reconstruction state government of Texas was trying to get $10 million from certain individuals who had held some bonds on behalf of the Confederacy era state government.
In my experience, few lawyers--including constitutional lawyers--really know the story behind any of these cases, and simply learn their names and memorize the capsule precedent.
A few weeks ago, I wrote about the case that broke FDR's National Recovery Administration: A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States (1935). The plaintiffs really suffered, and the Feds, aided and abetted by much of the media, were pure scoundrels--not to mention that the laws they were trying to enforce were insanely stupid.
The Schechters, having their business and lives ruined by dear Franklin D., voted for him every time he ran.
Bottom line: A "good" Supreme Court decision is one in which you agree with the political results. There are seldom "higher principles" at work.
Best-selling author Diane Kress provides great information for the 60% of us who tend toward metabolic syndrome.
The American Council on Science and Health (ACSH) is a consumer education consortium concerned with issues related to food, nutrition, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, lifestyle, the environment and health. ACSH is one of the few fearless voices of reason on these matters.
The original and best internet passport service.
One guy who really understands the financial markets. Brilliant insights.
Coach Kevin Collins has an impressive resume, and uses all of his talents to demolish the Left. Site includes some guest columnists, as well.
This blog, designed and written exclusively by Lawrence F Muscarella, PhD, gives you the most comprehensive discussion of healthcare-associated (hospital) infections (or, “HAIs”), infection control, and both instrument and endoscope reprocessing in the world.
Provides much-needed balance to the increasingly strident health care lobby that seems intent on scaring everyone about almost everything.
Your antidote to formaldehyde phobia in the media, from ACC's formaldehyde panel.
If you want to incorporate or form an LLC in Delaware, this is the place to go.
Expert analysis of what's wrong with American health care. Advocating for accountability, integrity, transparency, honesty, and ethics in leadership and governance of health care.
One of the best and biggest health sites on the web. New content on a daily basis, geared to the professional and informed lay audience.
The independent pros in gas detection, known for taking on the tough applications. Site has much technical material, way beyond mere product touts.
One of the original news/opinion aggregate sites. Founder/Editor-in-Chief/Publisher Binyamin L. Jolkovsky calls it "The intersection of faith, culture and politics." Loaded with content tending toward politically conservative. An oasis for energetic Judaism.
Steven Milloy and company do a great job in exposing junk science, which he defines as: Faulty scientific data and analysis used to advance special and, often, hidden agendas. Lots of good content.
Feldman does videos, marketing, commentary and...puppets. He also understands tech and art.
Chronicling the high cost of our legal system. Water Olson and company explore an American legal system that too often turns litigation into a weapon against guilty and innocent alike, erodes individual responsibility, rewards sharp practice, enriches its participants at the public’s expense, and resists even modest efforts at reform and accountability.
Ohio-based "bug guy" Rich Kozlovich dishes on junk science, junk politics, and many other matters. Rich is also on the prowl 24/7 for supplemental content written by Others. And he still has time to kill pests!
Nick Francis is a superb music programmer. Of course, it helps that he has an encyclopedic knowledge of music. Stream, subscribe, enjoy.
Hard-hitting and well-written conservative commentary, from a modern day renaissance man. The Duke is not afraid to ruffle some feathers, or invoke his Catholic faith, either.
Expert assistance on GSA, VA, DOD, and other federal contracts. Yes, there really can be great customer service in such an esoteric space.
Most of us use Excel. Some of us use it a lot, and are constantly looking for easier ways to do things. Francis Hayes--the Excel Addict--offers plenty of free tips, a regular newsletter, and an inexpensive book to download.
Everything you know about cholesterol causing heart disease is wrong, and this website is run by eminent doctors who are trying to set the record straight. But, with billions of dollars in drug sales at stake, it won't be easy.
The name says it all. Jo-Ann Heslin and Karen Nolan have sold millions of books, and have re-launched their information-packed website. What's more, they encourage website visitors to submit questions.
Conservative commentary from all over the Web. Updated constantly.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.