Source: https://www.lawfareblog.com/litigation-documents-resources-related-travel-ban
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 13:40:29+00:00

Document:
President Donald Trump’s first executive order banning entry into the United States by immigrants and refugees from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria and Yemen, and his revised executive order banning entry from all those countries but Iraq, are facing legal challenges in a number of federal jurisdictions. On Sept. 24, 2017, President Trump issued a third executive order. On June 26, 2018, the Supreme Court rejected challenges to the third iteration of the ban on statutory and constitutional grounds, reversing a preliminary injunction against the ban issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Litigation remains ongoing.
Below is a roundup of the documents in ongoing litigation related to the executive orders. We will update this post as further information comes in.
This case has been consolidated with International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump and Zakzok v. Trump.
This case has been consolidated with International Refugee Assistance Project v. Trump and Iranian Alliances Across Borders v. Trump.
Most of the documents for this case have been filed under seal. We have provided all available documents not under seal, and have indicated the presence of key documents that are under seal.
This case has been amended to address the September 24 executive order. Documents relating to this phase of the litigation are found above.
Note: For Supreme Court amici, refer to Hawaii v. Trump, formerly consolidated with IRAP v. Trump.
Motion to Compel Production of Documents Responsive to RFPS 40, 41, and 44, Filed by Plaintiffs.
NOTICE of Hearing on Plaintiff's Motion For Temporary Restraining Order set for 3/15/2017 @ 09:30 AM before JUDGE DERRICK K. WATSON. Counsel may participate by phone by notifying Judge Watson's Courtroom Manager (808-541-3073) by 3/14/2017 and providing the phone number where counsel may be reached at the time of the hearing. The Court will contact the parties via phone at the time of the hearing.
Jan 12 2018 Brief of respondents State of Hawaii, et al. in opposition filed.
Jan 16 2018 Reply of petitioner Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed.
Jan 19 2018 Petition GRANTED. In addition to the questions presented by the petition, the parties are directed to brief and argue Question 3 presented by the brief in opposition.
Jan 25 2018 Blanket Consent filed by Petitioners, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al..
Feb 05 2018 Application (17A824) for leave to file the brief of petitioners, brief of respondents, and the reply brief on the merits in excess of the word limits, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Feb 08 2018 Application (17A824) granted by Justice Kennedy for leave to file the brief of petitioners, brief of respondents, and the reply brief on the merits in excess of the word limits.
Feb 21 2018 Joint appendix filed.
Feb 21 2018 Brief of petitioners Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, et al. filed.
Feb 23 2018 SET FOR ARGUMENT on Wednesday, April 25, 2018.
Apr 25 2018 Argued. For petitioners: Noel J. Francisco, Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For respondents: Neal K. Katyal, Washington, D. C.
Jun 26 2018 Judgment REVERSED and case REMANDED. Roberts, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Kennedy, Thomas, Alito, and Gorsuch, JJ., joined. Kennedy, J., and Thomas, J., filed concurring opinions. Breyer, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Kagan, J., joined. Sotomayor, J., filed a dissenting opinion, in which Ginsburg, J., joined.
This case has been remanded to the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals with orders to dismiss the challenge to Executive Order 13780 as moot.
The parties are directed to file letter briefs addressing whether, or to what extent, the Proclamation issued on September 24, 2017, may render cases No. 16-1436 and 16-1540 moot. The parties should also address whether, or to what extent, the scheduled expiration of Sections 6(a) and 6(b) of Executive Order No. 13780 may render those aspects of case No. 16-1540 moot. The briefs, limited to 10 pages, are to be filed simultaneously with the Clerk and served upon opposing counsel on or before noon, Thursday, October 5, 2017. The cases are removed from the oral argument calendar, pending further order of the Court.
This case as been dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. This was a private attorney general case and was not being brought by the State of California itself.
This case has been dismissed.
This case has been voluntarily dismissed. Documents will be added when available.
This case has been dismissed unopposed.
MINUTE ORDER: In light of the parties' joint status report, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction is due 3/2/2017, and Plaintiffs' Reply is due 3/7/2017. A hearing is hereby set for 3/13/2017 at 3:00 p.m. in Courtroom 2. Signed by Judge Tanya S. Chutkan on 2/22/2017.
The court has created a publicly available page containing all documents, which can be found here.
The offical audio recording of Oral Arguments on February 7, 2017 can be found here.
Sua Sponte Request that a vote be taken as to whether the order issued on February 9 should be reconsidered en banc, February 10, 2017.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.