Source: http://www.carsandracingstuff.com/library/government/327US463.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 19:45:58+00:00

Document:
THE COVERAGE OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT.  P. 466.
EXEMPTION PROVIDED BY SEC. 13(A)(2) OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT.
CARRIER ACT, 1935," SINCE THEIR EMPLOYER IS NOT A CARRIER.  P. 467.
TO EMPLOYEES OF "CARRIERS."  P. 467.
COMMISSION ARE ENTITLED TO GREAT WEIGHT.  P. 471.
BOUTELL ET AL., DOING BUSINESS AS F.J. BOUTELL SERVICE CO., V.
WALLING, WAGE AND HOUR ADMINISTRATOR.
STANDARDS ACT.  THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AFFIRMED.  148 F.2D 329.
THIS COURT GRANTED CERTIORARI.  325 U.S. 849.  AFFIRMED, P. 472.
STANDARDS ACT OF 1938.  52 STAT. 1060, 29 U.S.C. SEC. 201, ET SEQ.
TRANSPORTATION EQUIPMENT OWNED AND OPERATED BY THE DRIVE-AWAY COMPANY.
DISTINCT FROM" THE SERVICE COMPANY.
GREATER PART OF WHOSE SELLING OR SERVICING IS IN INTRASTATE COMMERCE"
BOTH QUESTIONS AND GRANTED THE INJUNCTION SOUGHT BY THE ADMINISTRATOR.
THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS AFFIRMED ON BOTH GROUNDS.  148 F.2D 329.
WE AGREE WITH THOSE CONCLUSIONS.
EMPLOYEES DO NOT COME WITHIN THE EXEMPTION STATED IN SEC. 13(A)(2).
ENGAGED IN A RETAIL OR SERVICE ESTABLISHMENT WITHIN THE MEANING OF SEC.
13(A)(2) AS INTERPRETED IN ROLAND ELECTRICAL CO. V. WALLING, 326 U.S.
657, AND MARTINO V. MICHIGAN WINDOW CLEANING CO., 327 U.S. 173.
THE EMPLOYEES RENDERING IT ARE TO BE EXEMPTED UNDER THAT PROVISION.
AWAY COMPANY THROUGH THE SERVICE COMPANY.
477, FOR A DIFFERENT RESULT UNDER OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES.
EMPLOYMENT REMAIN APPLICABLE TO THEM.
MAXIMUM HOURS OF SERVICE FOR EMPLOYEES OF MOTOR CARRIERS UNDER SEC.
HAS ASSUMED THAT ITS JURISDICTION IS LIMITED TO EMPLOYEES OF "CARRIERS"
TRUCKING ASSNS., 310 U.S. 534, 549.
WHO ARE NOT THEMSELVES EMPLOYEES OF A CARRIER.
HOURS ARE REGULATED BY THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT.
WHICH HE IS EMPLOYED."  52 STAT. 1063, 29 U.S.C. SEC. 207(A).
IN INTRASTATE COMMERCE; .."  552 STAT. 1067, 29 U.S.C. SEC. 213(A)(2).
FN3  SEE NOTE 1 SUPRA.
SERVICE OF EMPLOYEES, AND SAFETY OF OPERATION AND EQUIPMENT.
EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ACT, NEW YORK CENTRAL R. CO. V. MARCONE, 281 U.S.
YORK, N.H. & H.R. CO. V. WALSH, 223 U.S. 1, 6.  COMPARE SHANKS V.
DELAWARE, L. & W.R. CO., 239 U.S. 556, 560.
FN6  SEE NOTE 4 SUPRA.
MOTOR CARRIERS HAVING SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OF ANY SUCH MATTER."  49 STAT.
REGULATION OF THIS KIND PROVIDED FOR IN SECTION 225  ..."   79 CONG.
REC. 5652.  SEE ALSO, P. 5660.
CARRIERS, AND PRIVATE CARRIERS OF PROPERTY  ..."   79 CONG. REC.
12,229.  SEE ALSO, S. REP. NO. 482, 74TH CONG., 1ST SESS. (1935) P. 1.
"CONCLUSIONS OF LAW.  -  ..
DIRECTLY WITH THE POST OFFICE DEPARTMENT.  ID., PAR. 7(B).
OF SECTION 204 OF THE MOTOR CARRIER ACT, 1935  .."
TWO CORPORATIONS IN FORM ARE ONE IN SUBSTANCE.
COVERAGE OF THE FAIR LABOR STANDARDS ACT.

References: V.

 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.