Source: http://cases.familylorefocus.com/2018/04/
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 16:49:14+00:00

Document:
Application for care and placement orders in relation to three children, two of whom suffer from chromosomal disorder, and all of whom suffer from global developmental delay.
Application by local authority for permission to dismiss care proceedings, in case in which it was believed that the father was an Islamist terrorist.
Judgment concerning issue of whether public law children proceedings should be heard in Ireland or England.
Judgment approving care plan for 16 year old with behavioural problems.
Application by parents for permission to remove child with neurodegenerative condition to a hospital in Rome.
Appeal by mother against order that child should live with his father, who lives in Canada, and spend holidays with his mother, who lives in England.
Application by local authority for an order depriving 17 year old of his liberty, due to his behavioural issues.
The wife was seeking to enforce financial provision orders totalling over £450million in a case where the husband had taken elaborate steps to conceal his wealth and evade enforcement of the judgment.
ECHR finds fresh application from family of Alfie Evans inadmissible.
Judgment setting out reasons for adjournment of final hearing of inheritance claim.
Application by Clinical Commissioning Group for a declaration that it is not in patient's's best interests for Clinically Assisted Nutrition and Hydration (CANH) to be continued.
Application by wife for financial remedies, and cross-application by husband seeking an order reflecting the terms of a prenuptial agreement.
Judgment endorsing care plan constructed by NHS Trust, setting out the provisions for the end of child's life.
Judgment in Inheritance act claim, dealing with preliminary issue of whether the deceased was domiciled in England at the date of his death.
Appeal by local authority against refusal to make all the findings of fact it sought in care proceedings.
Care proceedings concerning two children. Fact-finding hearing to ascertain cause of injuries to one of the children.
Fact-finding hearing in care proceedings concerning two children, one of whom has a serious life-limiting genetic disorder.
Application by the Queen's Proctor to dismiss a divorce petition and set aside a decree of divorce.
Appeal by parents against order declaring that it would be lawful for artificial ventilation, which is currently being provided to child, to be withdrawn at the date and time specified in the order.
Applications by mother for permission to appeal against a finding of fact in private law proceedings and, in care proceedings, against refusal to admit expert evidence and to re-open fact-finding hearing.
Further judgment concerning the placement of a child in a secure environments in a place not authorised pursuant to the regulations made under section 25 of the Children Act.
Judgment concerning the placement of a child in a secure environments in a place not authorised pursuant to the regulations made under section 25 of the Children Act.
Application for permission to appeal from an order that NHS Tust would be acting lawfully by withholding from child certain medical treatment including all forms of ventilation, and that thereafter he receive only palliative care.
Application by father alleging that refusal to make a residence order in his favour in respect of his son, and an interim measure as regards contact rights applied while the proceedings had been pending, had violated his right to respect for his family life.
Application by local authority for permission to withdraw care proceedings in respect of three children.
Application by mother alleging that a refusal to issue a residence order in her favour in respect of her son had violated her right to respect for her family life.
Care proceedings. Fact-finding hearing to ascertain cause of death of child. Suggested guidance given relating to future police disclosure in cases involving a death of a child or children and/or an alleged serious assault against a child or children.
Care proceedings concerning three children, in which both the father and the mother of two of the children were convicted of offences of Modern Day Slavery.
Appeal by wife against financial remedies order, on the basis that the judge failed to award her a fair share of the husband's post-separation earned income. Appeal dismissed.
Appeal against care order, arguing that the process had been fatally compromised by the court's inability to produce adequately precise findings. Appeal allowed.
Public law children –Physical abuse – Practices of religious community – Removal of children and of parental rights – Whether there had been a breach of Art 8. The ECHR held that there had been no violation of Art 8 by domestic courts in removing the parental rights of parents involved in corporal punishment against their children as part of their religious beliefs.
Public law children - Physical abuse – Practices of religious community – Removal of children and of parental rights – Whether there had been a breach of Art 8. The ECHR held that there had been no violation of Art 8 by domestic courts in removing the parental rights of parents involved in corporal punishment against their children as part of their religious beliefs.
Private law children – Paternity – DNA test refuted paternity – Application outside of one-year time limit for challenging paternity before court – Whether there had been a breach of Art 8. The ECHR held that the domestic court’s refusal to permit the father to challenge the paternity of the child constituted a breach of Art 8.
Judgment in care and placement proceedings, written to be understandable by parents.
Appeal against dismissal of TOLATA claim to a half share in a property on the grounds that when it was bought in 1959 the claimant paid a deposit of £100 and a further £500 as a down payment, which comprised half the purchase price. Appeal dismissed.
The claimant claimed reasonable financial provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 out of the estate of her late partner, who had left her nothing. An order was made which transferred one of the properties to her.
Appeal by mother against provision requiring return of children to USA even if she is refused a visa. Appeal allowed.

References: Art 8
 Art 8
 Art 8
 Art 8
 Art 8
 Art 8