Source: https://es.scribd.com/document/344294306/Twitter-Complaint
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 19:47:04+00:00

Document:
15 does not pertain to imported merchandise.
2 the tens of thousands or more.
11 might occur if their real identities became known to their superiors.
18 real identities in any of their public communications through this account.
22 accounts users portray as casting doubt on Administration policies.
2 unlawful and must be enjoined for two reasons.
8 information pertaining to the identity of the individual(s) behind the @ALT_USCIS account.
21 pursuing that investigation outweigh the important free speech rights of Twitter and its users.
22 Defendants have not even attempted to meet that burden.
24 this Court declare the summons unlawful and enjoin its enforcement.
28 the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and other Federal statutes.
2 under the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. 2201-2202 and the APA, 5 U.S.C. 706.
5 Defendant is an officer or agency of the United States sued in his or its official capacity.
13 at no charge to its users.
16 immigrations and customs, and disaster prevention and management.
19 to import customs, immigration, border security, and agricultural protection.
20 16. John F. Kelly is the Secretary of DHS. He is sued in his official capacity.
26 of CBP. He is sued in his official capacity.
4 removed the unauthorized Tweets and blocked the former employees access.
12 or more. In some cases, multiple alternative agency accounts appeared for a single agency.
21 these accounts vary greatly.
3 Presidents nominee for Labor Secretary, Andrew Puzder.
user description that do not disclose the speakers real identity).
3 others, was created in late January 2017: @ALT_USCIS.
11 part of the broader alternative agency movement.
21 account have chosen to remain pseudonymous.
23 followers and has issued thousands of Tweets.
1 36. The @ALT_USCIS account has expressed dissent in a range of different ways.
3 that the author apparently believed cast doubt on the Administrations immigration policy.
17 House grounds to argue that the Administrations proposed border fence will be ineffective.
2 attempts to set up a new automated system for processing immigration applications.
17 Protectionthe agency that issued the summons challenged by this lawsuit.
2 Supreme Court nominee Neil Gorsuch, among many other issues.
6 Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy (DACA), the account issued the following Tweet.
21 the form it was received by Twitter, is attached as Exhibit A.
3 summons as well as other sanctions.
14 Twitter not to disclose the existence of this summons for an indefinite period of time.
19 object to the examination of the requested records by advis[ing] the person summoned [i.e.
26 procedure for Twitter to object to compliance with the summons.
1 information about the identified account using a summons issued under 19 U.S.C. 1509.
12 and taxes had been paid on imported merchandise.
28 sue absent withdrawal of the summons.
not authorized to obtain under 19 U.S.C. 1509.
reasons are explained more fully below.
relate narrowly to imports, and the meaning of the fourth term is cabin[ed] by the first three.
Acts of Congress. (quoting Gustafson v. Alloyd Co., 513 U.S. 561, 575 (1995))).
4 investigation or inquiry relating to the import of merchandise.
7 the production of only records that fall within a narrow category defined in 15 U.S.C.
9 person he may deem proper to produce records, as defined in subsection (d)(1)(A).).
14 records that the CBP Summons demands Twitter to disclose meet neither of these criteria.
16 activity of importing merchandise. See United States v. Frowein, 727 F.2d 227, 233 (2d Cir.
6 the United States is prohibited.
11 from their importation of merchandise into the United States.
22 exceeds the scope of CBPs authority under 19 U.S.C. 1509.
28 limitations. 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(A), (C).
Cir. 2013) (quoting Waters v. Churchill, 511 U.S. 661, 674 (1994)).
2 assert the First Amendment rights of their anonymous users).
10 of an intolerant society. Id. at 357.
15 Online Speakers, 661 F.3d 1168, 1172-73 (9th Cir. 2011) (citing McIntyre, 514 U.S. at 344 n.6).
28 of an individuals interest in anonymity.) (quoting American Constitutional Law Found., Inc. v.
1 Meyer, 120 F.3d 1092, 1103 (10th Cir. 1997))); see also Am. Civil Liberties Union of Nevada v.
2 Heller, 378 F.3d 979, 988 (9th Cir. 2004).
12 sharp attacks on government and public officials.).
19 Web pages, mail exploders, and newsgroups, the same individual can become a pamphleteer.
25 Anonymous Online Speakers, 661 F.3d at 1173 (quoting McIntyre, 514 U.S. at 341-342).
8 information available. Johnson v. Multnomah Cty., Or., 48 F.3d 420, 424 (9th Cir. 1995).
15 disseminate it. San Diego v. Roe, 543 U.S. 77, 82 (2004).
14 records or business records of a member of the news media).
21 any element of any such offense.
27 Glassdoor, Inc, 2016 WL 1275566, at *16; Art of Living Foundation, 2011 WL 5444622, at *10.
28 Defendants have not come close to making that showing.
6 the First Amendment rights of Twitter and its users.
11 CBP Summons is contrary to constitutional right. 5 U.S.C. 706(2)(B).
19 authority, or limitations, id. 706(2)(C).
2 e. Grant such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper.
18 Counsel for Plaintiff Twitter, Inc.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v. 
 v.