Source: http://www.jurvestnik.psu.ru/index.php/en/issue-2-32-2016?id=2268
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 15:31:32+00:00

Document:
Annotation: Introduction: the article reviews and analyzes the existing legal theory and civil law approaches and positions on the content and relationships of the concepts of “restriction”, “limit”, “encumbrance”. These legal categories have different functional importance, which is evident from both analysis of their content and implementation of the subjective property right. Therefore, understanding the categories under consideration is of particular importance. Purpose: to form the idea of the existing different views on the content of the categories of “restriction”, “limit”, “encumbrance” and to present our own position on the issue. Methods: methodological framework of the research is based on a set of methods of scientific cognition, among which the dialectical method is the leading one; also, empirical methods of descriptions, comparison, as well as methods of analogy, abstraction, and the structural-functional method have been used. Results: limits and restrictions are inherent to the right of ownership. According to the author, limits of the right of ownership appear to be general frameworks determined by law, and the authorized person cannot go beyond them in order not to harm interests of other persons. Restrictions are understood as exemptions from the content of the property right associated with the imposition of restrictions on the owner, those being as a rule formulated through mandatory rules. Conclusions: limits (regardless of whether they belong to public or private ones) appear to be an objectified and relatively more static category, while the nature and content of encumbrances and restrictions can vary in the course of changes and development of both public relations themselves and conditions, as well as prerequisites for the implementation of the property right. It is proposed that the legislator should establish the principles of limits and restrictions for both subjective property rights and the title to land.
Akkuratov I. Yu., Korshunov N. M., Khorev A. A. K voprosu ob ogranicheniyakh i obremeneniyakh prava sobstvennosti [On the Issue of Limitations and Burdens of Ownership]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law. 2000.
Issue 10. Pp. 68–72. (In Russ.).
Aksenenok G. A., Kikot' V. A., Fomina L. P. Kritika sovremennoy burzhuaznoy agrarnopravovoy teorii [Criticism of Modern Bourgeois Agrarian Legal Theory]. Moscow, 1972. 320 p. (In Russ.).
Aleksandrina M. A. Soderzhaniye prava sobst­vennosti po sovremennomu rossiyskomu zakonodatelstvu: diss. ... kand. jurid. nauk [The Content of Ownership According to Modern Russian Legislation: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Volgograd, 2002. 172 p. (In Russ.).
Basin Yu. G. Obremeneniya veshchnykh prav v grazhdanskom oborote [Property Rights Encumbrance in Civil Circulation]. Izbrannyye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu [Selected Works on Civil Law]. Almaty, 2003. 732 p. (In Russ.).
Vedyakhin V. M. Pravovyye stimuly: ponyatiye, vidy [Legal Incentives: Concept, Types]. Pravovedeniye – Pravovedenie. 1992. Issue 1. Pp. 51–55. (In Russ.).
Grazhdanskoye pravo: uchebnik / pod red. A. P. Sergeyeva, Yu. K. Tolstogo [Civil Law: Textbook; ed. by A. P. Sergeev, Yu. K. Tols­toy]. Moscow, 2001. Vol. 1. 455 p. (In Russ.).
Komov N. V. Rossiyskaya model zemlepolzovaniya i zemleustroystva [The Russian Model of Land Use and Land Management]. Moscow, 2001. 423 p. (In Russ.).
Krasheninnikov P. V. Zhilishchnoye pravo [Housing Law]. Moscow, 2010. 413 p. (In Russ.).
Krassov O. I. Pravo chastnoy sobstvennosti na zemlyu [The Private Property Right for Land]. Moscow, 2000. 379 p. (In Russ.).
Kulagin M. I. Izbrannyye trudy po aktsionernomu i torgovomu pravu [Selected Works on Joint Stock and Commercial Law]. Moscow, 2004. 363 p. (In Russ.).
Mattei U., Sukhanov E. A. Osnovnyye polo­zheniya prava sobstvennosti [The Main Provisions of Ownership]. Moscow, 1999. 384 p. (In Russ.).
Meyer D. I. Russkoye grazhdanskoye pravo [Russian Civil Law]. Moscow, 2003. 831 p. (In Russ.).
Mukanova D. Ponyatiye obremeneniy prav na nedvizhimoye imushchestvo [The Concept of Encumbrances on Real Estate]. Zashchita grazhdanskikh prav – Protection of Civil Rights, 2005. Pp. 226–230. (In Russ.).
Niyazova A. N. Garmonizatsiya chastnykh i publichnykh interesov v realizatsii prava sobstvennosti na zemlyu [Harmonization of Private and Public Interests in Exercising Property Rights for Land]. Pravo sobstvennosti v Kyrgyzskoy Respublike: voprosy razvitiya [Ownership in the KyrgyzRepublic: Development Issues]. Bishkek, 2004. Pp. 4–20. (In Russ.).
Niyazova A. N. Subyektivnoye pravo i interes [Legal Right and Interest]. Problemy osushchestvleniya i zashchity subyektivnykh prav v Kyrgyzskoy Respublike [Issues of Implementation and Protection of Legal Rights in the KyrgyzRepublic: Development Issues]. Bishkek, 2012. Pp. 35–39. (In Russ.).
Pobedonostsev K. P. Kurs grazhdanskogo pra­va: v 3 t. / pod red. V. A. Tomsinova [The Course on Civil Law: in 3 vol.; ed. by V. A. Tomsinov]. Moscow, 2003. Vol. 3. 345 p. (In Russ.).
Porotikova O. A. Problema zloupotrebleniya subyektivnym grazhdanskim pravom [The Problem of Abuse of Civil Rights]. Moscow, 2002. 206 p. (In Russ.).
Skryabin S. V. Pravo sobstvennosti i inyye veshchnyye prava [The Ownership Right and other Property Rights]. Grazhdanskoye pravo: sb. st. Obshchaya chast: ucheb. posobiye [Civil Law: Collected Articles: Textbook]. Almaty, 2006. Pp. 14–31. (In Russ.).
Stankevich T. B. Ogranicheniya prava sobstvennosti na zemelnyye uchastki: Dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk [Land Ownership Restrictions: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Krasnodar, 2003. 184 p. (In Russ.).
Shvedkova O. V. Priobreteniye i osushchest­vleniye prava sobstvennosti na zhilyye pomeshcheniya. dis. ... kand. jurid. nauk [Acquisition and Implementation of Property Rights to Residential Premises: Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2004. 179 p. (In Russ.).

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.