Source: https://es.scribd.com/document/388082145/Orden-sobre-derechos-electorales-en-Florida
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 06:49:11+00:00

Document:
plain language of the Voting Rights Act, they must.
for class certification, in a separate order after the motions have been fully briefed.
establishes and protects the voting rights of citizens educated in Puerto Rico.
384 U.S. 643, 645 n.3 (1966).
classroom language was other than English. 52 U.S.C. § 10303(e).
Osceola, Palm Beach, Pinellas, Polk, and Seminole. 81 Fed. Reg. 87534–35 (2016).
school in San Juan, Puerto Rico where instruction was mostly in Spanish. Id.
English well. Id. at ¶¶ 4–5.
populations in the remaining 20 Florida counties that conduct English-only elections.
community. ECF No. 2, Ex. 5, at ¶¶ 2–6, Ex. 6, at ¶¶ 3–6, Ex. 7, at ¶¶ 3–5, Ex.
¶ 10, Ex. 6, at ¶ 5–6, Ex. 7, at ¶ 5, Ex. 8, at ¶ 6, Ex. 9, at ¶ 6.
Manatee, Marion, Pasco, Sarasota, and St. Lucie. ECF No. 3, at ¶ 5.
November 2018 election. Id. at ¶ 10.
that all election information is digitally available in Spanish. ECF No. 2, at 31.
interpretation and implementation” of election laws. Fla. Stat. § 97.012(1).
actions directly were, at minimum, fairly traceable to their alleged injuries.
such as the 53-year-old Voting Rights Act. Fla. Admin. Code. R. 1S-2.032.
Legislature” only qualifies “such other laws.” Fla. Stat. § 15.13.
orders.” ECF No. 42, at 10.
590 (internal quotation marks omitted).
validly abrogated state sovereign immunity in § 2 of the Voting Rights Act.”).
Moreover, Congress “has acted pursuant to a valid exercise of power.” Id.
conduct complained of.” Luckey v. Harris, 860 F.2d 1012, 1015–16 (11th Cir.
acknowledging the necessity of bilingual ballots when required by law. Fla.
to comply with federal law.” ECF No. 42, at 9 (emphasis in original). Not quite.
clear that he does have power—and responsibility—to comply with federal law.
administration of the election laws.” Fla. Stat. § 15.13. Not some election laws.
law”—not just “state law”—requires them.
charged has no authority to enforce the challenged statute.” Summit Med.
the challenged statute. His authority thwarts his sovereign immunity claim.
Court must do at the motion to dismiss stage, see Bell Atlantic Corp. v.
expert, provide sufficient basis for stating a claim.
officer and his own regulations call for bilingual ballots when required by law.
ballots when required by law extend across the state.
issuance of a preliminary injunction.
4(e) to assist Puerto Rican voters. Katzenbach, 384 U.S. at 645 n.3.
use of “any test or device,” including “demonstrat[ing] any educational achievement”).
decide the winner of the Nobel Prize for Chemistry—ineffective, in other words.
575, 580 (7th Cir. 1973) (emphasis added).
abilities. United States v. Berks Cty., Pa., 250 F. Supp. 2d 525 (E.D. Pa. 2003).
in a language they may not fully understand.
elections. Kusper, 350 F. Supp. at 606.
in an American-flag school in Puerto Rico.” Berks Cty., 250 F. Supp. 2d at 537.
due to be interpreted according to its plain meaning. Id.
Puerto Rican population, if any.
in this case. Id. at 10–13.
consideration of a preliminary injunction.
as the American Community Survey, to be reliable. Defendant Detzner attempts to paint Dr.
qualified individuals to provide expertise on the subject of this litigation.
language. Moreover, Plaintiffs have tailored their claims to only 32 counties.
Spanish election materials, even under the plain language of Section 4(e).
equal protection of the laws.” Katzenbach, 384 U.S. at 652–53.
to vote” is at issue. Obama for Am. v. Husted, 697 F.3d 423, 436 (6th Cir. 2012).
League of Women Voters of N.C. v. North Carolina, 769 F.3d 224, 247 (4th Cir.
Party v. Scott, 215 F. Supp. 3d 1250, 1258 (N.D. Fla. 2016).
absence of a preliminary injunction.
480 U.S. 531, 542 (1987).
and oversight—all of which is well-documented in the record.
integrity of its election process.” Eu v. San Francisco Cty. Democratic Cent.
with “reasonable diligence.” Benisek v. Lamone, 138 S.Ct. 1942, 1944 (2018).
explain their budgets have already been set for the current election cycle.
“place administrative and financial burdens” on non-complying jurisdictions.
541; see also United States v. Georgia, 892 F. Supp. 2d 1367, 1377 (N.D. Ga.
the unique facts of Florida’s election administration system in the fall of 2018.
counties already provide some of the services this Court orders.
have or be printed on the same stock, etc.
aware of such sample ballots.
this Order on or before Wednesday, September 12, 2018.
4. The Secretary of State’s motion to dismiss, ECF No. 42, is DENIED.
SO ORDERED on September 7, 2018.

References: § 10303
 § 97
 § 15
 § 2
 v. 
 § 15
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.