Source: https://www.carltonfields.com/team/f/jaret-j-fuente?refindustry=a566f9f6-e1b1-4181-b167-d827912f7595
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 08:55:12+00:00

Document:
Jaret Fuente represents businesses and professionals in commercial disputes, class actions, and tort litigation in the construction, development, health care, insurance, products manufacturing, and real estate industries.
Jaret represents product manufacturers in the automotive, aviation, chemical, medical device, pharmaceutical, and sporting goods sectors in connection with consumer fraud, crashworthiness, design and manufacturing defect, and warranty claims. He also has extensive experience handling personal injury and wrongful death matters ranging from premises liability to benzene exposure.
Jaret represents builders, contractors, and developers in breach of contract, construction defect, mold, and building product-related claims. He represented home builders involved in the Chinese drywall product liability multi-district litigation proceeding in Louisiana.
Jaret has experience in all phases of litigation, including early case assessments and resolutions, class certification determination, binding arbitration, and trial.
Jaret is certified as a Circuit Civil Mediator by the Florida Supreme Court. He is also certified as a mediator by the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida.
Jaret is a contributor and editor of the Firm’s Classified: The Class Action Blog, and also serves on the firm’s e-discovery team.
Defended aircraft manufacturer in product liability litigation in state and federal courts arising from fatal crashes in general aviation.
Represented home builders in individual and class actions and in multi-district litigation proceedings involving Chinese drywall.
Represented contractors, home builders, and residential property lessors in construction defect litigation, including litigation arising from mold.
Represented prescription drug manufacturers in individual and mass tort actions involving personal injury and wrongful death claims.
Represented medical device manufacturers in individual and mass tort actions involving hip and knee implants.
Represented automotive manufacturer in class actions arising from consumer fraud and warranty claims, and defeated class certification.
Represented automotive manufacturers in personal injury and wrongful death actions arising from crashworthiness claims.
Represented chemical product manufacturer in personal injury and wrongful death actions arising from exposure to trace benzene.
Cramer v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2D-11-3402, 2012 WL 1537784 (Fla. 2d DCA May 2, 2012) (affirming, per curiam, summary judgment on individual Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act claim where plaintiff lacked expert proof of design defect, after denial of class certification).
Cramer v. Ford Motor Co., No. 2007-CA-2135-NC, 2010 WL 3337647 (Fla. Cir. Ct. 12th Jud. Cir. Aug. 25, 2010) (granting partial summary judgment on individual claims for express warranty and injunctive relief under the Magnuson Moss Warranty Act, after denial of class certification).
Cramer v. Ford Motor Co., 49 So. 3d 241 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (affirming denial of plaintiffs’ motion for class certification as to claim for violation of Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act).
Lewis v. Ford Motor Co., 685 F. Supp. 2d 557 (W.D. Pa. 2010) (holding that CAFA jurisdiction existed at time of removal, that denial of class certification did not divest Court of CAFA jurisdiction, and denying plaintiffs’ renewed motion to remand in Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law claim).
Lewis v. Ford Motor Co., 263 F.R.D. 252 (W.D. Pa. 2009) (denying plaintiffs’ motion for class certification as to claim for violation of Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law).
Lewis v. Ford Motor Co., No. 09-164, 2009 WL 2355744 (W.D. Pa. June 30, 2009) (denying plaintiffs’ motion to exclude defense expert in consumer class action under the Pennsylvania Unfair Trade Practices and Consumer Protection Law).
Brisson v. Ford Motor Co., 602 F. Supp. 2d 1227 (M.D. Fla. 2009) (dismissing consumer class action against vehicle manufacturer for breach of express and implied warranties).
Marzullo v. Crosman Corp., 289 F. Supp. 2d 1337 (M.D. Fla. 2003) (granting summary judgment in favor of air rifle manufacturer on design defect and failure to warn claims).
Palermo v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et. al., 148 F. Supp. 2d 1340 (S.D. Fla. 2001) (granting summary judgment in favor of physician on § 1983 claims).
Palermo v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc., et. al., 133 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (S.D. Fla. 2001) (granting partial summary judgment in favor of physician on § 1983 claims).
The Proposal For Settlement – An All-Or-Nothing Proposition?
Spray Polyurethane Foam Insulation Products Liability Litigation – Cooling Down or Heating Up?
Opening Statements in Jury Trials: Just How Important Are They?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 1983
 v. 
 § 1983