Source: http://www.paulhastings.com/professionals/details/mitachatterjee
Timestamp: 2019-04-18 19:09:00+00:00

Document:
Paromita (Mita) Chatterjee is an associate in the Litigation practice and is based in the firm’s Washington, D.C. office.
Her practice focuses on intellectual property disputes before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). In addition, Ms. Chatterjee counsels clients on protecting intellectual property rights, including conducting pre-litigation analyses and advising on offensive and defensive litigation strategies. She also has experience on matters in U.S. district courts and before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
Ms. Chatterjee has been involved in more than 50 inter partes review (IPR), covered business method (CBM), and post-grant review (PGR) proceedings. As back-up counsel, she manages the preparation of written submissions, takes and defends technical expert depositions, and second-chairs oral arguments. Ms. Chatterjee's practice encompasses a wide variety of technologies, including mechanical devices, consumer electronics, chemical technologies, and pharmaceuticals, with a particular emphasis on medical devices.
Before joining Paul Hastings, Ms. Chatterjee was a patent agent and patent attorney at an intellectual property boutique firm where she gained significant experience drafting and prosecuting patent applications. She also worked at the Johns Hopkins University Technology Transfer Office.
Ms. Chatterjee devotes a portion of her time to pro bono matters. She has written briefs on behalf of veterans of military service before the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, represented clients in immigration court, and served as a Guardian Ad Litem for a young child in the D.C. Superior Court.
Medtronic, Inc. v. Niazi Licensing Corp. (PTAB). Representing Medtronic in multiple IPRs.
Four Mile Bay, LLC v. Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. (N.D. Ind.). Representing Zimmer Biomet in patent litigation and concurrent IPRs involving medical devices.
FitBit, Inc. v. Aliphcom, Inc. d/b/a/ Jawbone (PTAB). Represented FitBit in multiple IPRs.
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien AG (PTAB). Represented Covidien AG in multiple IPRs.
Zimmer Biomet Holdings, Inc. v. Four Mile Bay, LLC (PTAB). Represented Zimmer Biomet in multiple IPRs.
Apotex, Inc. v. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. (PTAB). Represented Merck in an IPR.
Zimmer, Inc. v. Bonnuti Skeletal Innovations Inc. (PTAB). Represented Zimmer, Inc. in multiple IPRs.
Back Bay Medical Inc. v. Covidien Holdings (C.D. Cal). Represented Covidien in a patent litigation involving medical devices.
Co-author, “A First Look at the Impact of Recent Rule Changes on Patent Owner Preliminary Responses,” Landslide, April 12, 2017.
Organizer and Speaker at the Pre-Conference Bootcamp, PTAB Bar Association Inaugural Conference, Washington, D.C., March 1-3, 2017.
Co-author, “More Rule Changes for PTAB Proceedings”, published April 4, 2016.
Co-author, “Breaking the Glass Ceiling: Women in the Boardroom,” 2015.
Co-author, “The Practitioner’s Guide to Trials Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board,” American Bar Association, Section of Intellectual Property Law, 2014.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.