Source: http://www.touchngo.com/sp/html/sp-7224.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 14:29:53+00:00

Document:
Judicial District, Anchorage, Andrew Guidi, Judge.
discretion or clear error in the court's rulings and therefore affirm the judgment.
2014 Ronalda filed for divorce.
was burdened with "numerous debts."
was supposedly undergoing cancer treatment."
Campo house, returning to Alaska periodically for employment opportunities.
November Anthony quitclaimed the property to her for $100.
and debt.   Both Anthony and Ronalda testified about the Campo property's value.
that in her opinion it was worth $208,000.
Ronalda secured by that property.
property, and (3) dividing the property equitably."
303 P.3d 453, 458 (Alaska 2013)).
3                    Id. (citing Beals, 303 P.3d at 459).
4                     Urban v. Urban, 314 P.3d 513, 515 (Alaska 2013) (quoting Barnett v.
Barnett, 238 P.3d 594, 597 (Alaska 2010)).
manifestly unreasonable, or . . . stems from an improper motive.' "
decision on the equitable division of the marital estate.
5         Gunn  v.   Gunn,   367  P.3d   1146,   1150   (Alaska  2016)   (quoting  Kestner  v.
Clark,   182  P.3d   1117,   1121-22  (Alaska  2008)).
6         Id.  (quoting  Roderer  v.  Dash,  233  P.3d   1101,   1107  (Alaska  2010)).
7         Alaska  R.  Civ.  P.  26.1(a),  (b)(1).
8         Urban,  314  P.3d  at  517  (quoting  Alaska  R.  Civ.  P.  37(c)(1)).
as she acquired more information about her Native corporation stock and bank accounts.
served interrogatories, requests for production, and requests for admission the next day.
witness or information not so disclosed.").
affording an opportunity to be heard, may impose other appropriate sanctions.").
superior court has discretion whether or not to order discovery."
Anthony's outstanding motion to compel its filing before the trial ended.
11          Douglas v. Glacier State Tel. Co.                             , 615 P.2d 580, 593 (Alaska 1980).
355 P.3d 516, 518 (Alaska 2015).
resign or be terminated because of Anthony's continual harassment of her at work.
Ronalda's failure to produce her 2014 tax return.
Valuation Of The Campo Property                                                                                                                                                                              .
current value of the home" was a 2014 tax assessment of approximately $95,600.
online research, the property was worth between $205,000 and $208,000.
knowledge about the value of such property."
P.2d 951, 953 (Alaska 1963)).
"presumed,"   admissibility   need   not   rest   on   a   foundation   in   research   or   expertise.
determination of a fact in issue" - are deemed satisfied.
about damages based on the value of his property before and after [an] alleged taking"
either of them could offer an opinion regarding its value' ").
Schymanski, 674 P.2d at 286).
value, but it concluded that "Anthony's valuation is too low to be accepted as reliable"
took into account comparable property sales and listings in the area.
discretion." (citing                      Schymanski, 674 P.2d at 286)).
that it clearly erred by accepting Amy's.").
mistake has been made"22 in the court's valuation of the Campo property at $208,000.
we affirm its decision on this issue.
P.2d 1187, 1192 (Alaska 1987)).
or engaged in vexatious conduct."
fees in this case because [Ronalda] is in a stronger financial position than [Anthony]."
P.3d 845, 849 (Alaska 2003); Gregory v. Sauser, 574 P.2d 445, 445 (Alaska 1978).
(Alaska 1989);  Horton v. Hansen, 722 P.2d 211, 218 (Alaska 1986)).
otherwise); Rodvik v. Rodvik, 151 P.3d 338, 351-52 (Alaska 2006) (same).
the superior court's award of enhanced attorney's fees.
disregard the relative economic situations and earning powers of the parties."
28               Kowalski, 806 P.2d at 1373.
consider further his arguments about the other $30,000.
did not plainly err when it failed to order a hearing sua sponte.
delivery and motions for attachment").

References: v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.