Source: http://lawsdocbox.com/Legal_Issues/65542570-Revised-may-8-2017-in-the-united-states-court-of-appeals-for-the-fifth-circuit.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 09:43:30+00:00

Document:
Download "REVISED May 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT"
1 Case: Document: Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/08/2017 REVISED May 8, 2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff - Appellant United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED May 4, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk v. BDO USA, L.L.P., Defendant - Appellee Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas Before STEWART, Chief Judge, and KING and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. CARL E. STEWART, Chief Judge: During the course of an employment discrimination investigation, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ( EEOC ) brought a subpoena enforcement action against BDO USA, L.L.P. ( BDO ) in federal district court. The EEOC sought production of information relating to the investigation and asserted that BDO s privilege log failed to establish that the attorney-client privilege protected the company s withheld documents. The district court held that the log was sufficient and also granted BDO s request for a protective order. For the reasons that follow, we VACATE and REMAND.
Case4:08-cv CW Document30 Filed11/24/08 Page1 of 14 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Defendant.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE January 4, 2005 Session DANA COUNTS v. JENNIFER LYNN BRYAN, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Maury County No. 7873 Robert L. Holloway, Judge No.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA MONROE DIVISION AVAINE STRONG * CIVIL ACTION NO VERSUS * JUDGE DONALD E.
Case 1:14-cv-04142-PGG-JCF Document 84 Filed 02/05/16 Page 1 of 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK KESHIA FOSTER, et al., Plaintiffs, - against - CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant.
Vention Medical Advanced Components, Inc. d/b/a Advanced Polymers, a Vention Medical Company. Nikolaos D. Pappas and Ascend Medical, Inc.
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT JANUARY TERM 2011 UNIVERSAL CITY DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD., Petitioner, v. Case No. 5D10-2491 MICHAEL PUPILLO, ETC., ET AL., Respondent.
ADRIENNE RODRIGUEZ, MEMORANDUM Plaintiff, AND ORDER - versus - 13-CV-6552 (JG) Defendants.
Case 2:16-cv-00538-CB Document 103 Filed 01/18/18 Page 1 of 13 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA LAMBETH MAGNETIC STRUCTURES, LLC, Plaintiff, Civil Action No.
Case 1:10-cv AKH Document 68 Filed 03/25/11 Page 1 of 12. Plaintiff, Defendant.
2012 Decisions Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 6-7-2012 Carl Greene v. Philadelphia Housing Authority Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential Docket No.
Affirmed and Opinion Filed July 14, 2017 S In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01221-CV JOHN E. DEATON AND DEATON LAW FIRM, L.L.C., Appellants V. BARRY JOHNSON, STEVEN M.
Case: 11-2288 Document: 006111258259 Filed: 03/28/2012 Page: 1 11-2288 United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit GERALDINE A. FUHR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAZEL PARK SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee.
Case 3:03-cv JCH Document 100 Filed 06/24/2005 Page 1 of 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Defendant.
Case 2:05-cv CNC Document 119 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. v. Case No.
Case 2:05-cv-00467-CNC Document 119 Filed 07/13/2006 Page 1 of 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN INDIA BREWING, INC., Plaintiff, v. Case No. 05-C-0467 MILLER BREWING CO., Defendant.
Strategies for Defending 30(b)(6) Depositions Wednesday, September 5, 2012 7:15 a.m. 9:00 a.m. The Houstonian Hotel 111 North Post Oak Lane Houston, TX 77024 Overview of Topics Selecting the 30(b)(6) representative.
Case -00, Document -, 0//0, 0, Page of -00-cv Sharkey v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT SUMMARY ORDER RULINGS BY SUMMARY ORDER DO NOT HAVE PRECEDENTIAL EFFECT.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.