Source: https://www.criminallegalnews.org/cln-litigation/PA/prison-legal-news-v-office-of-open-records-court-opinion-4-8-2010/
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 22:19:19+00:00

Document:
has been taken nor has a hearing been held.
Act of February 14, 2008, P.L. 6, 65 P.S. §§67.101 – 67.3104.
has been substituted for Wright in the instant appeal.
use the information for commercial gain.
would process Wright’s request once he had paid the $8,750.
corrections agencies and had never received such a high estimate.
Wright’s request, and that most if not all of them were not available electronically.
This determination has not been appealed.
prepayment required for duplication costs.
to waive fees5 without giving reasons why it denied the request.
required to fulfill the request are expected to exceed $100.
regular business hours of an agency.
not pay the fee in full, the agency may withhold access. 65 P.S. §67.903.
(2) the agency deems it is in the public interest to do so.
stated by the agency for delaying or denying the request.” 65 P.S. §67.1101(a)(1).
why it believes that the information exists in a digital medium.
2 Pa. C.S. §§501-508, 701-704.
before the agency.” See National Treasury Employees Union v. Griffin, 811 F.2d 644 (D.C. Cir.
upon the request and the response(s) of the agency. 65 P.S. §67.1101(b)(3).
not guaranteed an evidentiary hearing.
Cleveland Board of Education v.
Matthews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319 (1976).
characterized, not its importance. For example, a driver’s license is a privilege, not a right.
Kocher v. Bickley, 722 A.2d 756 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1999).
review of the evidence, not de novo review. We explained that although 65 P.S.
more information concerning its decision. Id.
on the inherent authority of a court to supplement a record so that it is sufficient for review.” Id.
some non-discriminatory reason for not waiving the fee. Once there is some nondiscriminatory reason given, there is no right to appeal that determination. 65 P.S.
eight years, and that few, if any, of the records are available electronically.
denied. ORS 192.440(6). The RTKL contains no such provision.
PLN’s request encompassed 35,000 pages.
giving the Department the opportunity to remove or redact any non-public records.
electronic format. The nonexistence of information requires no further explanation.
the information requested is exempt from disclosure.

References: §67
 §67
 v. 
 §67
 v.

 v. 
 v.