Source: https://www.reference.com/web?q=What+Is+the+Shaw+V.+Reno+Case%3F&qo=contentPageRelatedSearch&o=600605&l=dir
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 13:56:52+00:00

Document:
The Shaw v. Reno case examined whether or not there was equal protection in a district within North Carolina. It was decided, 5-4, that there was not equal protection; redistricting that had taken place was done through unacceptable racial gerrymandering, according to the Chicago-Kent College of Law.
Shaw v. Reno Case Brief. Statement of the Facts: As a result of the 1990 Census, North Carolina was entitled to a 12 th seat in the House of Representatives. Accordingly, the State devised a redistricting plan that created one majority-black district.
A case in which the Court held that the redistricting of North Carolina was evidence of an attempt to separate voters based on race, and thus raised a constitutional issue under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
We'll hear argument now in No. 92-357, Ruth O. Shaw v. Janet Reno. Mr. Everett. Robinson O. Everett: Mr. Chief Justice, and may it please the Court: As our complaint seeks to make clear, this case poses the basic issue of how far a legislature may go in seeking to guarantee the election to Congress of persons of a particular race.
Shaw v. Reno Shaw v. Reno (1993) AND ITS PROGENY United States Constitution. According to the Encyclopedia of the American Constitution, about its article titled SHAW v.RENO (1993) AND ITS PROGENYNorth Carolina is subject to the preclearance provisions of section 5 of the voting right act of 1965.
Join over 277,000 law students who have used Quimbee to achieve academic success in law school through expert-written outlines, a massive bank of case briefs, engaging video lessons, comprehensive essay practice exams with model answers, and practice questions.
What Is the Shaw V. Reno Case?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V.