Source: https://www.criminallegalnews.org/cln-litigation/2018/FL/reply-brief-prison-legal-news-v-secretary-florida-dept-corrections/
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 22:23:31+00:00

Document:
rights violations in FDOC facilities might explain it.
delivering its important content to Florida inmates.
experienced-based evidence, rather than speculation.
See Beard v. Banks, 548 U.S. 521 (2006) (plurality).
policy . . . ever to succeed.” Beard, 548 U.S. at 535.
publications. See id.; Thornburgh, 490 U.S. at 408.
previously allowed the publication without incident.
speech); Wolf v. Ashcroft, 297 F.3d 305, 308 (3d Cir.
constitutional standards by fiat”); Beerheide v.
Ninth Circuit’s approach in Prison Legal News v.
enough to warrant deference to prison officials.
impact to win their case”).
Circuit approved just that here.
II. The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision is Incorrect.
precedents, Petitioner is plainly entitled to relief.
advertisement and without recorded incident.
in prison security.” Former Corr. Officials Br.1, 13-17.
might be permitted into Florida’s prisons. See Opp.32.
same speaker. Cf. Reed v. Town of Gilbert, 135 S. Ct.
censorship of Prison Legal News.
informed the Court that it would not. Former Corr.
do not ban Prison Legal News based on its advertising.
here is based on content. Opp.24.
view. See Holt, 135 S. Ct. at 866 (citing Procunier v.
Civil Rights Advocacy Org. Br.12-16.
speech proliferate across the country.
The Court should grant the petition.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v. 
 v.