Source: http://www.legalthree.com/law-school-outlines/law-school-contracts-outlin/
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 16:33:22+00:00

Document:
as good a position as they would have been if no breach was made.
for car. Expectation would be $5000. Focus on non breacher.
difference between his expected 100% hand versus the hand he got.
this going in to be a possibility.
no promise was made. Should not be harmed because of breach.
another party, Loveless refused to uphold option to buy.
options. And dealership was just trying to extort more money.
will contract always as long as there is no transaction costs.
but shows what will happen when trans costs are low.
Services are performed by a specific person.
informed when the K was made.
Dempsey to fight were taken at the Promoters own risk.
help non-breachers not to punish breachers.
leave washers out in rain.
further the damages and should have desisted from further work.
of the loss is difficult.
in this case by finding a new job because LDC was reasonable.
always off K. Not available for a partial breach.
the purpose of the K?
already get most of the benefit of the K??
breach, the results of determining a breach.
retires, Bowen hired to replace. Doesnt perfom his partner duties.
adequate assurance and none is provided then it is a repudiation.
keeps delaying because of defects.
repudiator absolutely will not perform.
assurances. If assurance isnt given THEN you can suspend perf.
dont have enough. Writes 2 K then he and wife sign.
overheard JK then there would be no K and he wouldnt get.
Examining offers would an ORP think there was an offer?
terms agreed, no loose ends?
agree to be bound ONLY on final written K?
K so great that it obvi requires a written K?
could buy a military jet.
K if he wants to?
away A’s power to accept and make a K if he wants to?
Counter Offer Is: 1. A rejection of the original offer AND 2.
D wins because P knew that the property had been sold.
once the offeree begins perfomance then offeror cannot revoke.
performance is begun then the offeror cannot revoke the offer.
because you can accept both ways.
maker “ill give you $100,000 if you find a crooked board.
builder needed to accept by informing D that he would start.
for a unilateral K can be revoked any time before performance.
Hobbs formed a pattern of doing business.
should notify the offeror if he does not intend to accept.
terms of the form K are enforceable.
they accepted the benefit of the data.
OBJ/SUBJ when they made the K?
mean in the Horseshoe biz?
minds, terms Ambiguous two different things!
each party thought it was a different shipping date.
of the K violating §2-207(2).
everything said is an express warranty, some can be mere puffery!
it to a mechanic or inspected it more thoroughly .
Disclaimers – Exclusion or Modification § 2-316.
Material Part is left out.
use PE to establish vag/amb.
Integrated K), also does not contradict the agreement.
Center v. Conn. Gen. Life Ins.
error said $500/mo 100mo certain.
$50,000 for $82 per year.
to expand their business in growing community.
creation, modification, or destruction of a legal relationship.
still HAS to be a Bargain! See §79 → .
CONSIDERATION which DOES NOT satisfy §71 consideration req.
“give up” a right you never had?
Subsequent – Must be met after parties obligation is triggered.
Precedent was for Int to send notice by Dec 17th .
the insurance money, reversed and remanded.
circumstances indicate that he has assumed the risk.
v. Cross Bay Chelsea, Inc.
RESTATEMENT §139 BOON WOULD RECOVER BECAUSE OF HIS RELIANCE.
should sell the equipment because there is a duty to mitigate.
a memo of the actual K.
probably want to assert breach of K along with the Sword PE claim.
has much greater flexibility when making awards.
damages awarded may be limited to serve justice.
acts intended/reasonably expected by the Promisor?
enforcement necessary to prevent injustice?
promises not to name him, they do anyways.
the fact because of relationship or trusyt.
circumstances allows a party to rescind K.
v Phoenix (p1092) (River Phoenix died).
Evidence always allowed to show misrepresentations/nondisclosures.
good faith fair dealing → Nope Seller shoulda known.
K was made to what extent did the terms make sense for both parties?

References: §2
 § 2
 v. 
 §79
 §71

v. 
 §139