Source: https://valawyersweekly.com/fulltext-opinions/2002/03/01/firebaugh-et-al-v-whitehead-et-al/
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 04:09:31+00:00

Document:
Home / Fulltext Opinions / Supreme Court of Virginia / FIREBAUGH, et al. v. WHITEHEAD, et al.
FIREBAUGH, et al. v. WHITEHEAD, et al.
upon the co-executors of Sowers estate, William C.
Botetourt County Clerks Office in Deed Book 336, Page 539.
and shown on that certain plat prepared by Charles R.
of Botetourt County, Virginia in Deed Book 336, Page 533.
and did not notify Sowers that they were leaving the area.
Whiteheads right of first refusal, for $94,950.00.
March 1994, when Claude Carter, BCCs attorney, called Mrs.
maintain their claim against the co-executors for damages.
1997, and postjudgment interest until the award was fully paid.
Sowers and the Whiteheads was binding upon the co-executors.
262 Va. 502, 514, 551 S.E.2d 313, 319 (2001).
identify the land subject to the right of first refusal."
binding upon them because the agreement was personal to Sowers.
exercise the right, or a duration limitation of the right.
refusal. We agree with the Whiteheads.
when this is done it is sufficient." Harper v.
S.E. 89, 93 (1925) (citing Merritt v. Bunting, 107 Va.
for conveying or transferring an interest in land.
Whiteheads and details about how the Whiteheads were to respond.
This Court addressed issues similar to these in Landa v.
contractual provisions "incomplete and uncertain"
because they failed to define "the remaining tract,"
11 Samuel Williston, Williston on Contracts ? 1441A (3d ed.
in advance. Landa, 237 Va. at 381, 377 S.E.2d at 420.
are not fatal to the validity of the right of first refusal.
specifically granted to "Charles Whitehead and Martha A.
right vested at the time of the execution of the agreement.
v. Cover, Drayton & Leonard, 104 Va. 428, 442, 51 S.E.
right of first refusal is valid and enforceable.
not only themselves but their personal representatives.
States v. Chain, 300 U.S. 31, 35 (1937)).
? 75.2 at 127 (James P. Nehf, ed. 2001).
enforceable right of first refusal.
property designated as Tax Parcel 72-83 in the deed.
amended bill of complaint is not relevant to this appeal.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v.

v. 
 v.