Source: https://case-law.vlex.com/vid/182-f-2d-703-602766886
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 14:11:35+00:00

Document:
Party Name: FRASCA v. HOWELL et al. WOLTZ v. HOWELL et al.
Mr. Michael J. Keane, Jr., Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Karl Michelet, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. Albert E. Brault, Washington, D.C., with whom Mr. Denver H. Graham, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees Spencer Howell and Robert O. Powell.
Messrs. Thomas S. Jackson and Irving B. Yockelson, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for appellee Charles Youts. Mr. Louis M. Denit, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellee Youts.
These appeals arise out of negligence actions for personal injuries sustained by appellants (plaintiffs) in an automobile collision. The cases were tried together before court and jury. A separate verdict was returned for each plaintiff in amounts substantially above her proven special damages. Nevertheless, plaintiffs moved for a new trial upon the ground that the verdicts were inadequate. Their appeals are based upon the court's action in overruling the motions and in denying certain requested jury instructions.
Dean v. Century Motors, Inc., 1946, 81 U.S.App.D.C. 9, 154 F.2d 201; Ramsey v. Ross, 1936, 66 App.D.C. 186, 85 F.2d 685; Washington Railway & Electric Company v. Upperman, 1918, 47 App.D.C. 219. See, generally, Miller v. Maryland Casualty Co., 2 Cir., 1930, 40 F.2d 463.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.