Source: http://aurora-group.eu/engppm/rubrics_1280.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 04:40:14+00:00

Document:
Bleykh N.O.. Educational Concept of Georgy Baev (1860 – 1939), Prominent Ossetian Politician and the First Mayor of Vladikavkaz // Pedagogy and education. – 2016. – № 2. – P. 152-158. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2016.2.19756.
Review: The subject of the study is the educational activity of the head of the city administration Georgy Baev whose activities have been ambiguously taken by the academic community until recently, more with the negative label of "the enemy of the Soviet government". However, while his public and political activitywas exposed by Caucasian historiographers rather well, his educational activities has been given far less attention. In this article the author tries to get rid of stereotypes that have been prevailing in science for many decades. It is time to redeem the good name to the aforesaid Ossetian activist and with good reason call him a distinguished son of Ossetia of his era, the first Ossetian economist, politician, publisher, folklorist as well as a fervent guardian of public education. The researcher has used the method of study and theoretical analysis of archival materials, scientific and literary sources. Analysis of Baev's journalistic materials on the history and didactics of the Ossetian school has allowed the author to make a conclusion about the progressive value of the ideas they put forward (humanization and democratization of school education, support of school education at the state level, continuous learning, transforming of school into the center of studies and educational work, development of the network of primary, secondary and higher institutions, etc.), which are still topical and can be used in modern education. The example of Georgy Baev's activities can teach the youth to love and respect their homeland, the place where they were born and live.
TsGA RSO-A. F. 224. Opis'.1. Delo.160. Ll.1-28.
TsGA RSO-A. F. 224. Op. 1. D. 167. Ll. 16-20.
TsGA RSO-A. F. 224. Op. 1. D. 8. L. 1-54.
TsGA RSO-A F. 224. Op.1. D.8. Ll. 14-21.
TsGA RSO-A. F. 224. Op. 1. D. 163. Ll. 16-20.
TsGA RSO. F. 224. Op. 1. D. 259. L. 1-145.
TsGA RSO-A. F. 224. Op. 1. D. 46. L. 6-12.
TsGA RSO-A. Op.1.D.278. L.1-10 ob.
Lysenko M. Narodnoe obrazovanie v Terskoy oblasti //Terskie vedomosti. 1899. 20 oktyabrya. S. 3.
Baev G. Otradnoe dvizhenie //Terskie vedomosti. № 44. 1896. S. 13-17.
Baev Shkol'nye kapitaly Terskoy oblasti //Novoe obozrenie, № 5900, 1901. S. 76-92.
Baev G. Eshche raz ob obrazovanii inorodtsev //Terskie vedomosti. № 78. 1896. S. 34-37.
ASOIGSI ORF. Op. 1. D. 20. L. 1-16.
ASOIGSI ORF. Op. 1. D. 20. Ll. 1-64.
Pustovoytov Yu.L.. Developing Schoolchildren’s Speech Culture in the Epoch of Telecommunication // Pedagogy and education. – 2015. – № 1. – P. 19-27. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2015.1.14367.
Review: The article is dedicated to problems of schoolchildren’s speech culture and its development in the context of telecommunication. The author analyses traditional definitions of 'speech culture' both from a purely linguistic point of view and psychological positions as well as schoolchildren's speech development as a pedagogical problem. Particular attention is paid to viewing communication on the Internet as a written discourse and its influence on schoolchildren’s speech culture. The research method used by the author is the analysis of classical sources and teaching practice at school as well as comparing obtained data with characteristics of the discourse on the Internet and peculiarities of its functioning. The novelty of the article consists in viewing classical postulates about speech culture from the point of view of the present reality. The main author’s conclusions are the following. 1) Written communication on the Internet is quite specific and cannot be viewed only by means of theories elaborated long before its appearance. 2) Work on schoolchildren’s speech development should proceed considering reality in which they will live when they grow up. This is why attention should be paid to not only traditional textbooks of written speech but also to the written discourse realized by means of telecommunication techhnologies.
V.V. Vinogradov. Russkiy yazyk. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1986. – 639 s.
Filin F.P. Neskol'ko slov o yazykovoy norme i kul'ture rechi // Ocherki teorii yazykoznaniya. – M., 1982.
Ozhegov S.I. Leksikologiya, leksikografiya, kul'tura rechi. – M.: Vysshaya shkola, 1974. – 350 s.
Vinokur G.O. Kul'tura yazyka. – M.:Z, 2006. – 352 s.
Rozental' D.E. Kul'tura rechi. – M.:MGU, 1960. – 127 s.
Flerov O.V. Osobennosti prepodavaniya vtorogo inostrannogo yazyka v nelingvisticheskom vuze // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. №1. S. 1-25.
Flerov O.V. Povyshenie effektivnosti obucheniya studentov inostrannomu yazyku na osnove kommunikativnoy metodiki. Dissertatsiya … kandidata pedagogicheskikh nauk : 13.00.08 / Voennyy universitet Ministerstva oborony Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Moskva, 2013.
Flerov O.V. Osobennosti prepodavaniya angliyskogo yazyka studentam s vysokim urovnem yazykovoy podgotovki // Sovremennoe obrazovanie. 2015. №1. S. 100-123.
Rybakova N.A. Samoaktualizatsiya pedagoga v professional'noy deyatel'nosti i usloviya ee stanovleniya // Vestnik Moskovskogo instituta lingvistiki. 2012. №3. S.100-105.
Akopov G.L. Problemnye aspekty otechestvennogo obrazovaniya v usloviyakh total'noy informatizatsii sotsiuma // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. — 2014.-№ 3.-S.81-91.
Ratiner T.G. Informatsionno-psikhologicheskaya bezopasnost' shkol'nikov pri rabote v internete // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. — 2014.-№ 1.-S.73-96.
Trofimova G.A. Srednee obrazovanie: poroki kachestva i puti ikh ustraneniya // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. — 2014.-№ 4.-S.1-11.
Faskhutdinova Yu.F. Motivatsiya i razvitie kognitivnykh sposobnostey u shkol'nikov. // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.140-154.
sub'ektivnoe i ob'ektivnoe // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2011. - 11. - C. 66 - 72.
Zvonova, E. E.. Metaphysics of Human in Alexander Chizhevsky’s Scientific Works // Pedagogy and education. – 2014. – № 1. – P. 10-21. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2014.1.12240.
Review: The subject under review of the present research article is Chizhevsky’s philosophical and anthropological views that are both presented in his researches and resulting from the latter. Much attention is paid not only to the general description of Alexander Chizhevsky’s work and reconstruction of Alexander Chizhevsky’s philosophical concept of human but also to touching upon questions that may arise in understanding these theories. Philosophical and anthropological views of Alexander Chizhevsky are studied taking into account the fact that his scientiyic research was conducted according to the tradition of the Russian cosmism. This allows to demonstrate how the ideas of ‘Leonardo da Vinci of the 20th century’ contribute to the particular philosophical tradition as well as to describe their singularity. The following methods were used in the research: analysis of text- based sources (including materials from the funds of the 1703 Archive of the Academy of Sciences of the Russian Federation), comparison, analysis, synthesis, induction and deduction, classiyication, generalization and historical method. The scientiyic novelty of the research is in reconstruction of Chizhevsky’s philosophical and anthropological views presented in his works as well as pointing out the problems and contradictions of these views. Based on the statement that Alexander Chizhevsky’s metaphysical concept of human is the part of his world view, the latter influencing Chizhevksy’s creative work in general, the author emphasizes the need for studying Chizhevsky’s metaphysical views in order to adequately evaluate and describe the heuristic potential of the cultural heritage of Leonardo da Vinci of the 20th century’.
Keywords: Chizhevsky, science, philosophy, cosmism, philosophical anthropology, determinism, holism, heliocentricism, telepathy, evolution.
Boroday Yu. M. Erotika, smert', tabu: tragediya chelovecheskogo soznaniya. M.: Gnozis, Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo, 1996. 416 s.
Girenok F. I. Russkie kosmisty. Iz tsikla «Stranitsy istorii otech. filos. mysli». M.: Znanie, 1990 . 62 s.
Gurevich P.S. Filosofskaya antropologiya: uchebnoe posobie / 2-e izd., ster. M.: Izd-vo Omega-L, 2010. 607s.
Zakharov M. L. Filosofskie idei A. L. Chizhevskogo: dis. ... kand-ta filosofskikh nauk. Murmansk, 2006. 145 c.
Russkiy kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoy mysli/ sost. S. G. Semenova, A. G. Gacheva. Vstup. st.: S. G. Gacheva; predisl.: S. G. Semenova; primech.: A. G. Gacheva. M.: Pedagogika: Press, 1993. 232 s.
Terekhov S. V. Evolyutsionnye idei v estestvennonauchnom napravlenii russkogo kosmizma (K. E. Tsiolkovskiy, A. L. Chizhevskiy, V. I. Vernadskiy) Orel: GOU VPO «OGU», 2011, 152 s.
Chekhovskaya V. K. Tezisy doklada «K voprosu o neposredstvennoy peredache mysli na rasstoyanie». Mashinopis'. 1920-e g. // Arkhiv RAN 1703. Op. 1. D. 665. L. 9.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Aeroionifikatsiya v narodnom khozyaystve / 2-e izd., sokr. M. : Stroyizdat, 1989. 485 s.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Aeroiony i zhizn'. Besedy s Tsiolkovskim / sost., vstup. st., kommentarii, podbor il. L. V. Golovanovoy. M.: Mysl', 1994. 735 s.
Chizhevskiy Aleksandr Leonidovich (1897-1964). Biofizicheskie mekhanizmy reaktsii osedaniya eritrotsitov / A. L. Chizhevskiy; Otv. red. V. P. Kaznacheev, V. Yu. Kulikov. Novosibirsk, Nauka : Sib. otd-nie, 1980. 177 s.
Chizhevskiy A. L. V ritme Solntsa / A. L. Chizhevskiy, Yu. G. Shishina. M. : Nauka, 1969. 112 s.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Zemlya i Kosmos. Zemnoe ekho kosmicheskikh bur' Moskva : Akad. Proekt : Al'ma Mater, 2013. 271 s. : il., portr., tabl.; 22 sm. (Filosofskie tekhnologi).
Chizhevskiy A. L. Kosmicheskiy pul's zhizni: Zemlya v ob'yatiyakh Solntsa. Geliotaraksiya / sost., vst. stat'ya, komm., podbor il. L. V. Golovanova. M.: Mysl', 1995. 767 s.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Kosmo-telluricheskaya sreda i chelovek. Opublikovano: Izd-vo Gippokrat. T. 4. № 10. S. 577-586. 1936, Parizh. Mashinopis'.// Arkhiv RAN 1703. Op. 1. D. 22. L. 20.
Chizhevskiy A. L. sovmestno s A. I. Larionovym, V. K. Chekhovskim. O peredache mysli na rasstoyanii. Vvedenie i gl. 1. Mashinopis' s pravkoy. Ne ranee 1925. // Arkhiv RAN 1703. Op. 1. D. 4. L. 18.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Rukovodstvo po primeneniyu ionizirovannogo vozdukha v promyshlennosti, sel'skom khozyaystve i v meditsine. M.: Gosplanizdat, 1959. 56 s., il.
Chizhevskiy A. L., Shishina Yu. G. Solntse i my. Varianty. Avtorizovannaya mashinopis'. Mashinopis' s pravkoy, 1963 g // Arkhiv RAN 1703. Op. 1. D. 32. L. 200.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Solntse i my [Tekst] / Prof. A. Chizhevskiy ; [Lit. zapis' Yu. Shishinoy]. Moskva : Znanie, 1963. 48 s., il. (Novoe v zhizni, nauke, tekhnike, 8 seriya. Biologiya i meditsina; 24).
Chizhevskiy A. L. Strukturnyy analiz dvizhushcheysya krovi [Tekst] / Prof. A. L. Chizhevskiy. Akad. nauk SSSR. Moskva : Izd-vo Akad. nauk SSSR, 1959. 474 s., il.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Tayna zhivogo vozdukha. Kaluga : NPO Gelios, 2004. 296 s.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Chelovechestvo i vozdukh. Vazhneyshaya problema nashey epokhi. Varianty i chernovye nabroski, zametki k ney. Avtograf, mashinopis' s pravkoy. Avtorizovannaya mashinopis'. 1960. // Arkhiv RAN 1703. Op. 1. D. 111. L. 68.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Fizicheskie faktory istoricheskogo protsessa. Kaluga, 1924, reprint 1991. 72 s.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Elektricheskie i magnitnye svoystva eritrotsitov. Kiev: Naukova dumka.,1973. 93 s.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Ya molniyu u neba vzyal / sost. A. V. Manakin. Kaluga, 1994. 73 s.
Chizhevskiy A. L. Uber die Periodizitat des europeischen Typhus reciirrens. Deutsch-Russische Medizinische Zeitschrift. Schriftleitung: Geh.-Rat. Prof.D-r med. F.Kraus (Berlin) und Prof.D-r med.N.Semaschko (Moskau). Berlin: 1928. № 12,-S.S. 671-684.
Chizhevskiy A. L. L'activité corpusculaire, électromagnétique et périodique du soleil et l'électricité atmosphérique, comme régulateurs de la distribution, dans la suite des temps, des maladies épidémiques et de la mortalité générale., Stockholm, 1937. 62 s., il.
Yagodinskiy V. N. Aleksandr Leonidovich Chizhevskiy. 1897-1964. M.: Nauka, 1987. 304 s.
Chernov, S. V.. Unique Companion of Enlightenment: Experience in Researching Creative Legacy of Mikhail Lomonosov // Pedagogy and education. – 2013. – № 3. – P. 202-224. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2013.3.10501.
Review: Studying the chronology of Lomonosov’s creative activity, we can see that he could easily go from chemistry researches to studying ancient Russian history, from physical experiments to creating projects of scientific expeditions, from the project of creating the first university in Russia or re-organization of St. Petersburg Academy of Sciences to writing poems. At the same time when Lomonosov worked on mosaic art in his chemical laboratory, he also wrote the Ancient Russian History and Russian Grammar, studied the problem of atmospheric electricity together with the professor Richter, corresponded with a foreign scientist, wrote and defended his numerous theses. The author bases his studies of Mikhail Lomonosov’s creative legacy on the idea of human genius. The latter was developed by the author on the basis of issues studied in philosophical anthropology. The results of the research very well show that all scientific, literary and social activities performed by Mikhail Lomonosov was aimed at building the path the Russian science and Russian Enlightenment followed later. Due to Lomonosov the Russian language gained not only national but also world significance and Lomonosov laid the foundation for the Russian language taking the rightful place in the all human spiritual culture. Lomonosov’s pedagogical ideas are presented not only in his works in the humanities, but also in science and even poetry. Lomonosov supported young talented Russian scientists and teachers. These facts show that the problem of teaching and up-brining of youth and children were one of the major matters in Lomonosov’s creative work.
Keywords: mission of Lomonosov’s genius, Russian Enlightenment, the Russian language, Lomonosov’s scientific method, curious researcher, keen philosopher, Lomonosov’s teaching ideals, the problem of teaching excellence, up-bringing, labor.
Contact information: Chernov Sergey Vasilievich, 144003, Russia, Moscow Region, Elektrostal, prosp. Lenina 45, of. 12.
Aksakov K. S. Lomonosov v istorii russkoy literatury i russkogo yazyka. Rassuzhdenie kandidata Moskovskogo universiteta Konstantina Aksakova, pisannoe na stepen' magistra filosofskogo fakul'teta pervogo otdeleniya. – Moskva, v tipografii Nikolaya Stepanova, 1846. – 517 s.
Batyushkov K. N. Rech' o vliyanii legkoy poezii na yazyk, chitannaya pri vstuplenii v «Obshchestvo lyubiteley russkoy slovesnosti» v Moskve. Iyulya… 1816. // Batyushkov K.N. Opyty v stikhakh i proze. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Nauka», 1977. – C.8–19.
Bezborodov M. A. M. V. Lomonosov – osnovopolozhnik khimii silikatov. – Minsk: Izdatel'stvo AN BSSR, 1952. – 23 s.
Berdyaev N. A. Russkaya ideya // Berdyaev N. A. Samopoznanie: Sochineniya. – M.: Eksmo, 2008. – 640 s. – (Antologiya mysli). – S.11–256.
Veyninger O. Pol i kharakter: Printsipial'noe issledovanie. – M.: «Latard», 1997. – 357 s. – (Fundament psikhologii KhKh v.).
Gogol' N. V. V chem zhe, nakonets, sushchestvo russkoy poezii i v chem ee osobennost' // Gogol' N.V. Sobranie sochineniy v shesti tomakh. T.6: Izbrannye stat'i i pis'ma. – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo khudozhestvennoy literatury, 1953. – S.141–184.
Derzhavina O. A. Stikhotvornye perelozheniya M. V. Lomonosova // Lomonosov i russkaya literatura / Otv. redaktor A. S. Kurilov. – M.: Nauka, 1987. – S.189–199.
Lebedev E. N. Lomonosov. – M.: Mol. Gvardiya, 1990. – 602 s., il. – (Zhizn' zamech. lyudey. Seriya biogr. Vyp. 705).
Lomonosov M. V. 276 zametok po fizike i korpuskulyarnoy filosofii / Per. B. N. Menshutkina // Lomonosov M.V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy T. 3: Trudy po fizike i khimii, 1738–1746 gg. – M.; L.: AN SSSR, 1950. – S.103–167.
Lomonosov M. V. Volfianskaya eksperimental'naya fizika, s nemetskogo podlinnika na latinskom yazyke sokrashchennaya, s kotorogo na rossiyskiy yazyk perevel Mikhaylo Lomonosov, imperatorskoy Akademii Nauk chlen i khimii professor // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy / AN SSSR. — M.; L., 1950–1983. T. 1: Trudy po fizike i khimii, 1738–1746. – M.; L.: AN SSSR, 1950. – S. 419–530.
Lomonosov M. V. Zapiska o neobkhodimosti preobrazovaniya Akademii Nauk. 1758–1759 // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 10: Sluzhebnye dokumenty. Pis'ma. 1734–1765 gg. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952. – S. 32–72. – S.57.
Lomonosov M. V. Kratkoe rukovodstvo k krasnorechiyu. Kniga pervaya, v kotoroy soderzhitsya ritorika, pokazuyushchaya obshchie pravila oboego krasnorechiya, to est' oratorii i poezii, sochinennaya v pol'zu lyubyashchikh slovesnye nauki // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 7: Trudy po filologii 1739–1758 gg. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952. – S. 89–378.
Lomonosov M. V. Oda na den' vosshestviya na Vserossiyskiy prestol Eya Velichestva Gosudaryni Imperatritsy Elisavety Petrovny 1747 goda // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 8: Poeziya, oratorskaya proza, nadpisi, 1732–1764. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1959. – S. 196–207.
Lomonosov M. V. O kachestvakh stikhotvortsa rassuzhdenie // Lomonosov M.V. Izbrannye filosofskie proizvedeniya. – M.: Gosudarstvennoe izdatel'stvo politicheskoy literatury, 1950. – S.517–532.
Lomonosov M. V. Pis'mo Teplovu G. N., 30 yanvarya 1761 g. // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 10: Sluzhebnye dokumenty. Pis'ma. 1734–1765 gg. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952. – S. 547–554.
Lomonosov M. V. Pis'mo Shuvalovu I. I., 4 yanvarya 1753 g. // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 10: Sluzhebnye dokumenty. Pis'ma. 1734–1765 gg. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952. – S. 474–476.
Lomonosov M. V. Pis'mo Shuvalovu I. I., iyun' – iyul' 1754 g. // Lomonosov M.V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 10: Sluzhebnye dokumenty. Pis'ma. 1734–1765 gg. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952. – S. 508–514.
Lomonosov M. V. Pis'mo Shuvalovu I. I., 19 yanvarya 1761 g. // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 10: Sluzhebnye dokumenty. Pis'ma. 1734–1765 gg. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952. – S. 545–547.
Lomonosov M. V. Pis'mo Eyleru L., 12 fevralya 1754 g. / Per. Ya. M. Borovskogo // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy . T. 10: Sluzhebnye dokumenty. Pis'ma. 1734–1765 gg. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952. – S. 500–503.
Lomonosov M. V. Report prezidentu AN o naznachenii v Khimicheskuyu laboratoriyu studentov. 1750 yanvarya 19 // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 9: Sluzhebnye dokumenty. 1742–1765 gg. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1955. – S. 47–49.
Lomonosov M. V. Rassuzhdenie ob obyazannostyakh zhurnalistov pri izlozhenii imi sochineniy, prednaznachennykh dlya podderzhaniya svobody filosofii / Per. pod redaktsiey T. P. Kravtsa // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy T. 3: Trudy po fizike i khimii, 1753–1765. – M.; L.: AN SSSR, 1952. – S.217–232.
Lomonosov M. V. Rossiyskaya grammatika // Lomonosov M. V. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy. T. 7: Trudy po filologii 1739–1758 gg. – M.; L.: Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1952. – S. 389–578.
Lomonosov M. V. Slovo pervoe o pol'ze khimii // Polnoe Sobranie Sochineniy Mikhayla Vasil'evicha Lomonosova, s pribavleniem zhizni sochinitelya i s pribavleniem mnogikh ego nigde eshche ne napechatannykh tvoreniy. Chast' tret'ya. – V Sanktpeterburge, izhdiveniem Imperatorskoy Akademii Nauk 1803 goda. – S.3–30.
Lomonosov M. V. Slovo tret'e o proiskhozhdenii sveta, novuyu teoriyu o tsvétakh predstavlyayushchee // Polnoe Sobranie Sochineniy Mikhayla Vasil'evicha Lomonosova, s pribavleniem zhizni sochinitelya i s pribavleniem mnogikh ego nigde eshche ne napechatannykh tvoreniy. Chast' tret'ya. – V Sanktpeterburge, izhdiveniem Imperatorskoy Akademii Nauk 1803 goda. – S.105–142.
Lomonosov M. V. Sobranie raznykh sochineniy v stikhakh i proze Mikhayly Vasil'evicha Lomonosova. Izdanie novoe ispravlennoe. Chast' pervaya. – SPb.: Pechatano v tipografii Shnora, 1803.
Lomonosov M. V. Yavlenie Venery na Solntse // Polnoe Sobranie Sochineniy Mikhayla Vasil'evicha Lomonosova, s pribavleniem zhizni sochinitelya i s pribavleniem mnogikh ego nigde eshche ne napechatannykh tvoreniy. Chast' tret'ya. – V Sanktpeterburge, izhdiveniem Imperatorskoy Akademii Nauk 1803 goda. – S.243–260.
L'vovich-Kostritsa A. I. Mikhail Lomonosov: ego zhizn', nauchnaya, literaturnaya i obshchestvennaya deyatel'nost' // Lomonosov. Griboedov. Sen'kovskiy. Gertsen.: Biogr. Povestvovaniya. – Chelyabinsk, 1997. – S.5–100.
Lyalikov K. S. Teoriya tsvetov Lomonosova // Lomonosov. Sbornik statey i materialov. T. III. – M.-L.: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR, 1951. – S.17–32.
Menshutkin B. N. Mikhail Vasil'evich Lomonosov. Zhizneopisanie. 3–e izdanie. – Sanktpeterburg: Tipografiya Imperatorskoy Akademii Nauk, 1911. – 160 s.
Moskovskiy universitet v vospominaniyakh sovremennikov. (1755-1917): Sbornik / Timkovskiy I.F., Lubyanovskiy F.P., Fonvizin D.I. i dr.; Obshchestv. redkol. serii A. N.Sakharov i dr. – M.: Sovremennik, 1989. – 736s. – (Pamyat').
Ob uchrezhdenii Moskovskogo universiteta i dvukh gimnaziy. S prilozheniem vysochayshe utverzhdennogo proekta po semu predmetu. 1755, genvarya 24. // Moskovskiy universitet v vospominaniyakh sovremennikov: Sbornik / Sost. Yu. N. Emel'yanov. – M.: Sovremennik, 1989. – 735 s. – («Pamyat'»).
Odoevskiy V. F. Russkie nochi. – L.: Nauka, 1975.
Pekarskiy P. Dopolnitel'nye izvestiya dlya biografii Lomonosova // Prilozhenie k VIII tomu zapisok Imp. Akademii Nauk. № 7. – Sanktpeterburg: V tipografii Imperatorskoy Akademii Nauk, 1865.
Pushkin A. S. Polnoe sobranie sochineniy v desyati tomakh. T.7: Kritika i publitsistika. – M.: Izdatel'stvo AN SSSR, 1958. – 766 s.
Seravin L. N., Orlovskaya E. E., Karpenko A. A. Rol' mekhano-i khemoretseptsii v vybore pishchi khishchnymi infuzoryami // Dvizhenie i povedenie odnokletochnykh zhivotnykh. – L: «Nauka», Lenigr. otd., 1978.
Chernov S. V. Geniy kak khudozhnik, kak myslitel', kak tvorets // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. Nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal, 2011. № 1(28). – S.34–44.
Chernov S. V. Kniga o genial'nosti. T.1: Chelovecheskiy geniy: Priroda. Sushchnost'. Stanovlenie. – Voronezh – M.: ANO «Institut dukhovnoy kul'tury i svobodnogo tvorchestva», 2010. – 562 s.
Chernov S. V. Kontseptual'nye osnovy issledovaniya chelovecheskogo geniya // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. Nauchno-prakticheskiy zhurnal, 2010. № 3(18). – S.45–55.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.