Source: http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/article/view/13400
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 03:09:45+00:00

Document:
Resumo: O objetivo deste artigo de cunho teórico é explorar a visão particular sobre a interface entre sintaxe e fonologia na teoria da Arquitetura em Paralelo (AP) formulada por Jackendoff (1997, 2002, 2007). Embora não disponha de um componente fonológico próprio, essa teoria tomou os desenvolvimentos da fonologia não-linear na década de 1970 como ponto de partida (GOLDSMITH, 1976; LIBERMAN; PRINCE, 1977; MCCARTHY, 1982). A ideia central da AP é distribuir a complexidade da gramática em diferentes “camadas” relativamente independentes, a fim de desonerar a sintaxe, que teria assumido um papel explanatório exagerado nas teorias gerativas mainstream (CULICOVER; JACKENDOFF, 2005). Segundo Culicover e Jackendoff (2005), ao livrarmos esse componente da responsabilidade de explicar todos os fenômenos linguísticos relevantes, seria possível formular uma Sintaxe mais Simples. Após esclarecer algumas características gerais da AP e sua relação com as teorias fonológicas não-lineares, o artigo focará no que este modelo tem a dizer sobre a interface entre sintaxe e prosódia. O artigo ilustrará a visão da AP sobre essa interface a partir de uma discussão específica acerca da regra do acento nuclear (CHOMSKY; HALLE, 1968; HALLE; VERGNAUD, 1987). A ideia principal é que as conclusões de Menuzzi e Mioto (2006), que vão de encontro à teoria de Cinque (1993), podem ser compreendidas como uma evidência positiva em prol da concepção da interface fonologia e sintaxe sugerida na AP, a qual confere mais autonomia ao componente fonológico.
Palavras-chave: interface sintaxe-fonologia; Sintaxe mais Simples; Arquitetura em Paralelo; regra do acento nuclear.
Abstract: The main goal of this theoretically oriented paper is to lay out the particular view of the interface between syntax and phonology in the theory of the Parallel Architecture (PA) as formulated by Jackendoff (1997, 2002, 2007). Even though it doesn’t have its own phonological component, this theory took the developments of non-linear phonology in the 1970s as a starting point (GOLDSMITH, 1976; LIBERMAN; PRINCE, 1977; MCCARTHY, 1982). The central idea in the PA is to distribute the complexity of the grammar among relatively independent tiers, in order to unburden syntax, which took an exaggerated explanatory role in mainstream generative theories (CULICOVER; JACKENDOFF, 2005). According to Culicover and Jackendoff (2005), in liberating this component from the responsibility of explaining all relevant linguistic phenomena, it may be possible to envision a Simpler Syntax. After clarifying some general characteristics of the PA and its relationship to non-linear phonological theories, the paper will focus on what this model has to say about the interface between syntax and prosody. The paper will illustrate the PA view on this interface through a specific discussion about the nuclear stress rule (CHOMSKY; HALLE, 1968; HALLE; VERGNAUD, 1987). The main idea here is that the conclusions reached by Menuzzi and Mioto (2006), which go against Cinque’s (1993) theory, can be understood as positive evidence for the conception of the syntax-phonology interface suggested in the PA, which grants more autonomy to the phonological component.
Keywords: syntax-phonology interface; Simpler Syntax; Parallel Architecture; nuclear stress rule.
ARISTÓTELES. De Anima. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2006.
BLEVINS, J. The syllable in phonological theory. In: GOLDSMITH, John (Ed.). The handbook of phonological theory. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1995.
BOSCH, A. Syllable-internal structure. In: OOSTENDROP, Colin et al. (Org.). The Blackwell companion to phonology. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, 2011.
CHOMSKY, N. The logical structure of linguistic theory. Cambridge: MIT Library, 1955. Documento mimeografado, manuscrito não publicado.
CHOMSKY, N. Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton, 1957.
CHOMSKY, N. Aspects of a theory of syntax. MIT Press, 1965.
CHOMSKY, N. Studies on semantics in generative grammar. The Hague: Mouton, 1972.
CHOMSKY, N. Language and responsibility. New York: Pantheon Books, 1979.
CHOMSKY, N. The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1995.
CHOMSKY, N. New horizons in the study of language and mind. Cambridge: CUP, 2000.
CHOMSKY, N. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry, Cambridge, v. 36, n. 1, p. 1-22, 2005.
CHOMSKY, N.; HALLE, M. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row, 1968.
CHOMSKY, N.; LASNIK, H. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry, Cambridge, v. 8, n. 3, 1977.
CINQUE, G. A Null Theory of Phrase and Compound Stress. Linguistic Inquiry, Cambridge, v. 24, n. 2, p. 239-298, 1993.
COSTA, J. Word order variation: a constraint based approach. Haia: Holland Academic Graphics, 1998.
CULICOVER, P.; JACKENDOFF. R. Simpler syntax. Oxford: OUP, 2005.
DOBROVOLSKY, M.; KATAMBA, F. Phonetics: the sounds of language. In: O’GRADY, W.; DOBROVOLSKY, M.; KATAMBA, F. (Org.). Contemporary Linguistics: an introduction. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman, 2011.
FODOR, J. The modularity of mind. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1983.
GOLDSMITH, J. Autosegmental phonology. 1976. Dissertation (Doctoral) – MIT, Cambridge, 1976.
HALLE, M.; VERGNAUD, J-R. An Essay on Stress. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1987.
HARRIS, R. A. The linguistics wars. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
HORNSTEIN, N. Theory of syntax: minimal operations and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
JACKENDOFF, R. Semantic structures. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1990.
JACKENDOFF, R. The architecture of the language faculty. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1997.
JACKENDOFF, R. Foundations of language. Oxford: OUP, 2002.
JACKENDOFF, R. Genesis of a theory of language: from thematic roles (source) to the Parallel Architecture (goal), 2014. Arquivo digital.
JACKENDOFF, R. Language, consciousness, culture: essays on mental structure. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2007.
JAKOBSON, R.; FANT, G.; HALLE, M. Preliminaries to speech analysis: distinctive features and their correlates. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1952.
KAGER, R. Optimality theory. Cambridge: CUP, 2004.
KISSEBERTH, C. W. On the functional unity of phonological rules. Linguistic Inquiry, Cambridge, v. 1, n. 3, p. 291-306, 1970.
LIBERMAN, M.; PRINCE, A. On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguistic inquiry, Cambridge, v. 8, n. 2, 249-336, 1977.
MCCARTHY, J. Nonlinear phonology: an overview. GLOW Newsletter, Amsterdam, v. 1, n. 8, p. 63-77, 1982.
MENUZZI, S.; MIOTO, C. Advérbios monossilábicos pós-verbais no PB: sobre a relação entre sintaxe e prosódia. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, Belo Horizonte, v. 14, n. 2, p. 211-243, 2006.
NESPOR, M.; VOGEL, I. Prosodic phonology. Dordrecht: Foris, 1986.
ODDEN, D. On the role of the Obligatory Contour Principle in phonological theory. Language, Baltimore, v. 2, n. 62, 1986.
POLLOCK, J-Y. Notes on clause structure. In: HAEGEMAN, Liliane (Org.). Elements of grammar: handbook in generative syntax. Dordrecth: Kluwer, 1997.
SELKIRK, E. Phonology and syntax: the relationship between sound and structure. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1984.
SAUSSURE, F. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot & Rivages, 1995.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.