Source: http://dgjeep.blogspot.com/2013_11_17_archive.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 14:12:39+00:00

Document:
The Judicial sophistry  of “absolute immunity” creates “absolute power” to the ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION  of We the People’s unalienable rights under color of law... the AUDACITY of the INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a “fantastic or delusional” scenario.
If you can believe the Black Robed, Royalist, Article III and UNCONSTITUTIONAL judiciary in Connick v. Thompson, 563 U.S. ___ (2011) We the People have sub silentio GONE beyond the "sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity" and "incredible" scenario into audacious INSANITY, ignorance and stupidity in support of a "fantastic or delusional" scenario.
I mean why would We the People even have gone to the effort of a revolution war, a constitution, a bill of rights and a civil war to establish "rights inhering in a state of freedom and belonging to American citizenship" if it was our intent sub silentio to exempt those responsible "as to defeat the ends the people desired to accomplish, which they attempted to accomplish, and which they supposed they had accomplished by changes in their fundamental law"???
The REASON we have FIVE times as many people in jail than any other country in the free world is we do not invest in JUSTICE. Justice is not worth the effort in the self-centered view of the Black Robed Royalist, Article III and unconstitutional Judiciary. We have the Jim Crow ear, the Jane Crow Era, the Plea Bargain Era and the Exclusionary Rule Era, where JUSTICE is proclaimed too overgenerous, and nobody is thus answerable to it. A Judge can make up probable cause out of knowingly fraudulent information for an unrelated charge that results in a NOT "facially valid court order" and the signed warrant becomes unquestionable as regards the "property in rights"  of the innocent victim being deprived!!!! Prosecutors can hide behind the sincerely ignorant and conscientiously stupid denial of exculpable evidence/due process. The police can give "knowingly false testimony " and withhold evidence. There is nothing in the plea bargain era that the innocent victim can do to redress the JUSTIFIABLE grievance.
As examples of the Judicial sophistry, that has corrupted We the People's unalienable rights under color of law, I submit, Randall v. Brigham, 74 U.S. 7 (1868) the origin of judicial criminal sophisticated "absolute immunity," Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335 (1872) origin of sophisticated Judicial civil "absolute immunity," Blyew v. United States, 80 U.S. 581 (1871) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for racially motivate mass murder, United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for racially motivated massacre (Colfax Riot/pogrom), United States v. Harris, 106 U.S. 629 (1883) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for the states allowance of kidnapping, assault and murder without regard to the 14th Amendments security, Civil Rights Cases, 109 U.S. 3 (1883) creating sophisticated racial segregation and the ongoing Jim Crow discrimination over the "necessary and proper" "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) separate and UNEQUAL, clarifying sophisticated segregation over the necessary and proper "Act to protect all citizens in their civil and legal rights." 18 Stat. 335, enacted March 1, 1875, Pierson v. Ray, 386 U.S. 547 (1967) reaffirmed Judicial sophisticated "absolute immunity," Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U. S. 409 (1976) prosecutorial sophisticated "absolute immunity," Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 (1978) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for forced sterilization, and Briscoe v. LaHue, 460 U.S. 325 (1983) sophisticated "absolute immunity" for "knowingly false testimony by police officers," and "all persons that were integral in the Judicial Process." If that is not ABSOLUTE CORRUPTION of We the People's intent to establish justice, I can not imagine what is.
"Immunity is given to crime, and the records of the public tribunals are searched in vain for any evidence of effective redress." "The courts are in many instances under the control of those who are wholly inimical to the impartial administration of law and equity." I say it NOW, Wednesday, November 20, 2013!!! Justice William O. Douglas said it in 1961 and 1967.  Mr. Lowe of Kansas and Mr. Rainey of South Carolina respectively said respectively said it originally in 1871 at the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1871 (now codified in Federal Statute laws as Civil 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 1985).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 1983