Source: http://www.microbiologynutsandbolts.co.uk/the-bug-blog/dying-for-a-drink-of-water
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 11:15:23+00:00

Document:
Dying for a drink of water?!
The A&E doctor rang the Microbiologist to discuss their patient. The patient had recently returned from volunteering at a Rohingya refugee camp in Bangladesh and now presented to A&E with watery diarrhoea which had been going on for a few days.
​The patient had not been able to get an immediate appointment with their GP and so had come to A&E a couple of days ago, despite their problem not really being an Accident or an Emergency. Stool samples had been sent to the lab on the first visit and the A&E doctor was following up the results as the patient had returned to the department with ongoing symptoms. The A&E doctor was calling the Microbiologist because no cause of the diarrhoea had been identified on the lab report.
​The Microbiologist looked at the request form for the stool sample and saw that it was blank. He asked the A&E doctor what he thought the clinical details box was for and when the A&E doctor sheepishly replied “clinical details” the Microbiologist explained that this could be a number of infections, some of which were high risk for laboratory staff to process and that his “decision” to write nothing on the form was negligent. How long does it take to write “Recently return from Bangladesh working as volunteer in a refugee camp. Profuse watery diarrhoea for 5 days”. It had been a long day and the Microbiologist was fed up! He went on … “This could be cholera, the WHO have just announced a mass vaccination campaign sending 900,000 doses of oral cholera vaccine to the region for Rohingya refugees”. The Microbiologist then gave the A&E doctor the basic advice about oral rehydration and arranged to test the stool for all of the things it would have been tested for if clinical details had been given.
​Violence erupted in Rakhine in late August when Rohingya militants attacked security posts, triggering a military response. More than half a million Rohingya have fled to Bangladesh to escape the campaign of killings and village burnings, refugees in Cox’s Bazar number close to 700,000 people, making this the world’s largest refugee camp. Cholera disproportionally impacts communities already burdened by conflict, lack of infrastructure, poor health systems, and malnutrition.
Cholera is an acute bacterial infection of the gastrointestinal tract caused by the bacterium Vibrio cholerae. There are lots of different serogroups of V. cholerae but most cholera is caused by either O1 (Classical and El Tor biotypes) or O139. Classical O1 causes the most severe infection.
Infection occurs as a result of the toxin produced by V. cholerae binding to the small bowel wall which in turn causes massive fluid and electrolyte transfer into the gastrointestinal lumen.
Cholera kills an estimated 95,000 people and affects a further 2.9 million more every year. Of these it is estimated that more than 50% of cholera is asymptomatic and many cases go unreported.
The incubation period is usually 2-3 days but can be as short as 12 hours and up to 5 days.
​Infection occurs after drinking water contaminated with V. cholerae (usually due to faecal contamination of water supplies) or eating faecally contaminated food. Asymptomatic people are infectious for up to 12-19 days after exposure and symptomatic patients remain infectious up to 5 days after symptoms resolve. Intermittent shedding of bacteria can occur for months after infection in a small number of people.
Most cases of cholera occur in the context of either extreme poverty with poor sanitation or humanitarian crises leading to large numbers of refugees living in poor sanitary conditions. Over two billion people worldwide still lack access to safe water and sanitation putting them potentially at risk of cholera.
Most Microbiologists are aware of the story of Dr Jon Snow, who in 1854 in Soho, London, traced the cause of a cholera outbreak to the Broad Street water pump and abolished the outbreak by removing the handle of the pump to stop people consuming contaminated water. This was a remarkable achievement as bacteria had not yet been shown to cause disease and so Dr Snow did not know the cause of cholera, he just worked out where it was coming from through careful questioning and observation (the key to good medicine really). It turns out that the well for the Broad Street pump had been dug within a few meters of an old cess pit and faeces from the cess pit had leaked into the well… the rest as they say is history.
During the 19th century cholera was the scourge of Asia with 6 pandemics spreading worldwide from the Bay of Bengal. In 1961 a 7th pandemic occurred with spread from Asia to Africa in 1971, and then to the Americas in 1991. This pandemic was caused by a new serogroup O1 strain called “El Tor”. Since then there has been emergence of another serogroup in Asia called O139, it has never been identified outside Asia. From 2001 to 2009 more than 90% of cholera (and almost all of the cholera related deaths) actually occurred in Sub-Saharan Africa.
In recent history there are two notable outbreaks. The first following the earthquake in 2010 in Haiti, which left a large proportion of the population homeless and living in poor sanitary conditions. Within 2 years there were over 600,000 cases and 7,500 deaths, in a population of just over 10 million. In 2012 half of the cholera in the world occurred on this small Caribbean island.
More recently an outbreak of cholera has occurred in Yemen with over 800,000 cases reported and more than 2000 deaths since April 2017. Suspected cases continue affecting an estimated 5000 people per day as millions of people are cut off from clean water, and waste collection has ceased in major cities.
Currently the WHO is implementing a mass vaccination program in Bangladesh in order to control another mass cholera outbreak in the Rohingya refugee camps. The WHO acknowledges that in both these outbreaks the answer is not only improved basic sanitation infrastructure and healthcare support but to find a political solution to conflict.
In early October a Global Task Force of over 50 United Nations and international agencies, academic institutions, and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) launched a new joint strategy to combat cholera, aiming to reduce deaths by 90 per cent by 2030. The WHO say “every death from cholera is preventable with the tools available today, including use of the oral cholera vaccine and improved access to basic safe water, sanitation and hygiene”.
In the developed world cholera is diagnosed by culturing V. cholerae from a stool sample. Specific culture media is required, called Thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose agar (TCBS for short), and because cholera is rare in these developed countries it is not routinely tested for. It is imperative that good clinical information is provided with the request for stool culture, especially a travel history as well as duration of symptoms, contact with others who have similar symptoms and any risky pastimes e.g. water sports.
​If the patient might have typhoid or paratyphoid the sample should be labelled HIGH RISK to help protect the laboratory staff from acquiring infection from the sample or culture. Once a V. cholerae has been cultured it should then be tested for O1 and O139 antigens and sent to the reference laboratory to look for the production of toxin.
In the context of a cholera outbreak only representative stool samples need to be tested to make sure the cause of diarrhoea hasn’t changed and antimicrobial sensitivity can be done. During an outbreak a simple case definition (see previous blog on Norovirus at the World Athletics Championships – what is an outbreak) that includes symptoms of cholera plus potential exposure to contaminated water would be enough to make the diagnosis.
The treatment of cholera is relatively straight forward in principal but in practice it is not so easy. Almost all cholera deaths could be prevented with adequate rehydration of the patient and more than 80% can be treated with oral rehydration solutions (ORS) – you know them, the slightly salty lemon or blackcurrant powders travellers are told to take if they get diarrhoea. The problem is that the clean water needed to make up the ORS may not be available (it’s ironic that the treatment requires clean water as if they had that the person probably wouldn’t have acquired cholera in the first place!). Severe infection requires IV fluids but these are expensive and require expertise to be given safely, and all of this usually occurs in resource poor countries or areas of humanitarian crisis where getting even basic supplies can be almost impossible.
Mild infections: treat with ORS to replace estimated fluid loss (rate of loss x 1.5 per day). Zinc supplements reduce severity and duration of illness in children less than 14 years of age.
Severe infections: require initial rapid IV rehydration followed by ORS replacement. Antibiotics are also given to reduce the duration of illness and reduce the amount of rehydration required. Commonly used antibiotics include Doxycycline, Ciprofloxacin, Erythromycin or Azithromycin, but antibiotic resistance is an increasing problem and therefore antimicrobial sensitivity testing should be undertaken on representative outbreak strains to guide treatment.
The most important way to prevent cholera is to provide safe drinking water and sanitary disposal of human waste. However, this is not easily done in the situations where cholera occurs; poverty and humanitarian crises.
Another way to prevent cholera would be through mass vaccination in at risk groups. There are now 3 cholera vaccines which cost just US$6 per person, Dukoral®, Shanchol™, and Euvichol® available through the WHO. “The introduction of the oral cholera vaccine has been a game-changer in the battle to control cholera – bridging the gap between emergency response and longer-term control…with oral cholera vaccines now available, individuals can be fully vaccinated for up to three years of protection,” Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General of the World Health Organization.
However two doses of vaccine are required to prevent about 65% of cases of cholera, so although a breakthrough in outbreak management, they are not a replacement for safe drinking water.
Rapid treatment of cases and protective vaccination will help limit the spread of infection. Alongside this, infection control precautions using gloves and aprons for contact with infected body fluids, hand hygiene and safe disposal of faeces, are required to prevent ongoing transmission. Once an outbreak has occurred it is essential that clean water and sanitation are provided as quickly as possible.
So the patient’s stool sample was cultured on TCBS and the next day V. cholerae was grown. This was subsequently shown to be an O1 El Tor strain with cholera toxin. Because the patient just had mild diarrhoea he was advised to continue to drink ORS until his symptoms resolved. He was advised that he would be infectious for up to 5 days after his symptoms resolved so to continue to implement basic hand hygiene and infection control measures. He did not need antibiotics.
Would the two outbreaks be considered epidemics considering the effect they had on the human race? Also, what could have happened if the microbiologist hadn't found out that the patient had just got back from volunteering in a foreign country? Are there any other symptoms that would distinguish cholera?
Thanks for the question. I reality there is little to distinguish an outbreak and an epidemic. Both terms relate to an increase in infection above the normal rates within a specific population. Most people tend to use the term outbreak for a small geographic area e.g. a hospital ward or the hospital itself, maybe even a town or city, whereas an epidemic tends to be used for a wider area such as a region, county, state or country. Once it goes beyond the country's boundary to affect many other countries it becomes a pandemic.
At the end of the day it doesn't really matter, outbreak or epidemic in the setting of Bangladesh are both correct. Epidemic just sounds worse!
The TCBS agar needed to diagnose cholera, does it come from the same type of algae and have other chemicals added or it as natural as the regular agar that is used as a growth medium for other bacteria? Also why does cholera need a special medium for growth?
Thanks for the question. I might have to tackle this subject in a future blog! Basically laboratory agar all has the same base in that it is made from agar to create a solid jelly (think "jello" in the USA) media. Chemicals and components are then added to this to create growth conditions targeted specific bacteria. In general this creates non-selective, selective, fastidious and indicator media.
Non-selective will grow lots of things and fastidious will grow even more. Selective will only grow a limited number of bacteria and indicator gives a specific reaction which helps distinguish different types of bacteria.
TCBS is both selective and indicator.
The alkaline pH, sodium thiosulphate and sodium citrate suppress the growth of Enterobacteriaceae e.g. E. coli and the bile salts inhibit Gram-positive cocci. This is the selective component stopp9ng other bowel bacteria growing.
Sucrose is fermented by some bacteria and pH indicators in the media pick up on the acid production from sucrose fermentation which gives a yellow colour for some Vibrio spp. and not others. For example V. cholera ferments sucrose causing a yellow colour V. parahaemolyticus does not ferment sucrose and so the media stay blue/green.
The combination of these different reactions allows the lab staff to more easily recognise bacteria from this particular media.
I hope tis makes sense but if not I will get to this in a future blog and try and explain it in more detail.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.