Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/100623.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 01:59:59+00:00

Document:
KOSS CORP: Securities Class Action Suit Still Pending in Wis.
of $2.0 million until the claim resolution process is completed.
other industrial or commercial building purposes.
violations of the federal securities laws or state law.
in violation of the securities laws.
is necessary in order to provide appropriate relief.
10, 2010, with dispositive motions due by Dec. 2, 2011.
structured finance and other obligations.
Group, Inc., et al., on June 1, 2010.
director and one former officer, Case No. 08 CV 11241.
An amended complaint was subsequently filed on January 20, 2009.
violation of the securities laws.
in Tolin moved to dismiss the amended complaint.
decision on the motion to dismiss.
for almost all prescription drug sales in the United States.
these AZ drugs outside of Medicare in Massachusetts.
balance going to third-party payers.
the settlement of both Massachusetts claims and national claims.
pricing as required by law."
over the price of the company's cancer drug Zoladex.
final. A court date has yet to be set.
Francisco, Seattle, Chicago, Boston, Los Angeles, and Phoenix.
rights in large, complex litigation.
and Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2010.
costs of any such measures.
and sells certain electronic connectors manufactured by Kyocera.
Electronic Devices Resale and Connectors.
and that its product will reduce the home's resale value.
financial source for plaintiff recovery.
shortly before the weeklong trial.
they didn't," Mr. Gonzalez said during closing arguments Thursday.
times. "It's good for the business to keep it quiet."
and were to be back again Friday.
Knauf to hide this from anybody."
"But you can't now, can you?" asked Mr. Ehrenreich.
"I can't," Mr. Landers said.
disappointed in the verdict," he said.
"That defect was hidden, latent and undetectable," said Mr.
Sashi K. Gutpa v. Bell Microproducts Inc. et al., Case No.
Edward Wheeler v. Bell Microproducts Inc. et al., Case No.
Simon Hung v. Bell Microproducts Inc. et al., Case No.
Moshe Piller v. Bell Microproducts Inc. et al., Case No.
Shaun Quinney v. Bell Microproducts Inc. et al., Case No.
Stephan M. Jackson v. W. Donald Bell et al., Case No.
Robert Josepayt v. W. Donald Bell et al., Case No.
John R. Campbell v. W. Donald Bell et al., Case No.
California, County of Santa Clara.
California on May 7, 2010.
board members, as well as Avnet, Inc. and AVT Acquisition Corp.
abetted the individual defendants in their actions.
being paid in connection with the merger is too low.
rescission of the merger agreement.
The company has not yet filed responses to any of these lawsuits.
company's directors, Avnet or AVT Acquisition.
and Exchange Commission for the quarter year ended April 3, 2010.
industry, providing a range of services, on a nationwide basis.
and in-building network design, engineering and construction.
for alleged securities fraud over the Gulf of Mexico oil disaster.
been slower to table their own claims.
U.S. investors to recover damages through the US courts.
record, thereby artificially inflating its share price. When Mr.
working in the fishing and tourism industries.
Daniel Becnel, Esq., at Becnel Law Firm, known as the "Tort King"
claims against BP not covered by the escrow account in the courts.
heard in Houston, where its U.S. operations are based. But Mr.
live, for example in New Orleans.
addition to what the company has to pay anyway.
battle over the ownership of what is likely to be a huge oil find.
funds appear to have taken an even bigger hit.
crackdown to minimize the risk to shareholders.
affected business and tourism along the South Carolina coast.
state and federal courts since the spill happened April 20.
A hearing will be held on BP's request in Boise, Idaho on July 29.
the ongoing and in-depth investigation by Hagens Berman.
may choose to do nothing and remain an absent class member.
The case is Warren v. Chase Home Finance, LLC, et al., Case No.
Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
embezzled monies from the Company.
On May 25, 2010, the Company was delisted from the NYSE AMEX.
is also the mother of the CEO.
include their mailing address and telephone number.
about 6,300 Programmable thermostat communication module.
received any reports of injuries.
"TXU Energy" and "White Rodgers" printed on the front faceplate.
TXU Energy to customers in North Texas.
should not attempt to disable or replace the communication module.
communication module. For more information, contact Comverge Inc.
Cynthia Richter, et al. v. Dolgencorp, Inc., et al., Case No.
Commission for the quarter ended April 30, 2010.
damages, and attorneys' fees and costs.
involving claims similar to those raised in this action.
occasions, the last of which expired on Oct. 31, 2009.
individuals opted into the lawsuit.
this action is not appropriate for collective action treatment.
Corporation, Case No. 6:06-cv-06084-DGL, filed in the U.S.
District Court for the Western District of New York.
DGL, originally filed on Feb. 9, 2006 and amended on May 12, 2006.
proceed collectively or as a class.
for the quarter ended April 30, 2010.
and Exchange Commission for the quarter ended April 30, 2010.
punitive damages and attorney's fees and costs.
current and former female store managers under the Equal Pay Act.
The company opposed plaintiffs' motion.
General as store managers between Nov. 30, 2004 and Nov. 30, 2007.
for decertification of the Equal Pay Act class.
certification in the suit captioned Julie Cox, et al. v.
in the company's June 8, 2010, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
Republic stores in many other countries worldwide.
payment from a class action settlement.
Inc., et al., Alameda County Superior Court Case No. RG03091195.
("DeBenedictis"), Henry Edelson and Powertel Technologies, Inc.
release the class's claims against Defendant Edelson as well.
2000 through April 12, 2007 while you were a California resident.
form of Global Vision Products, Inc. for fraudulent purposes.
Defendant's Counsel and Class Counsel at the addresses below.
Requests must be received by August 17, 2010.
Class Counsel and Defendant's Counsel at the addresses below.
your attorney may appear at the hearing to explain your objection.
Please do not contact the Court directly concerning this lawsuit.
Sachs' business success during the class period.
must meet certain legal requirements to serve as a lead plaintiff.
the Merger at an October 30, 2008 special meeting of stockholders.
after the Merger was announced.
The suit, "Skold, et al. v. Intel Corp. and Hewlett Packard Co.,"
processor and processors made by a competitor of Intel.
motion for nationwide class certification for a third time.
Kelsea Baggett v. Hewlett-Packard Company et al., remains pending.
cartridge after the printer shuts down.
motion for class certification as moot.
No. 07-cv-00667 (C.D. Calif.) (Guilford, J.).
Hewlett-Packard Co. continues to defend the suit captioned Rich v.
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended April 30, 2010.
when printing black and white images and text.
class and a California-only damages class.
has been taken off of the calendar.
Standards Act and/or the California Labor Code.
California were misclassified exempt employees.
certified a class of information technology workers in California.
Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, which is pending.
Corporation, which was filed on March 16, 2009, and George, et al.
in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.
violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
have been misclassified as exempt employees under the FLSA.
Data Systems Corporation, filed on Oct. 23, 2007, and Azar v.
also pending in the same court alleging similar facts.
interest, costs, and attorneys' fees.
One purported class action lawsuit against Hewlett-Packard Co.
quarter ended April 30, 2010.
-- one commenced in Ontario in June 2006.
has been postponed and no new date has been set by the court.
posing a choking hazard to young children.
2010 through May 2010 for between $24 and $28.
OF THE FACILITIES OF HOUSTON NORTHWEST MEDICAL CENTER.
inform you of facts that affect your legal rights.
Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP.
access to or use of any facilities of the Hospital.
be paid to members of the class.
agreement is fair and reasonable.
concerning the entry of such order and judgment.
the time of the settlement agreement.
District of Florida, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida.
PLEASE FOLLOW THE PROCEDURES SET OUT ABOVE.
Thirty-three purported class action lawsuits were filed by U.S.
sale and pricing of SRAM products.
pursuant to a Tolling Agreement between the company and the U.S.
lawsuits brought by the U.S. Direct-Purchaser Plaintiffs.
subject to approval by the court before it becomes final.
claims and will not admit any wrongdoing or liability.
damages in an amount to be proven at trial.
the Eastern District of Wisconsin.
manufactures for inclusion with their own products.
Legal Newsline says ludicrous claims shouldn't have caused U.S.
Actavis Totowa and distributor Mylan Pharmaceuticals. Mr.
should any potential class member attempt to make one," he wrote.
consumer class action over Digitek heart medicine last week.
"There is a big imbalance between common and individual issues,"
Judge Goodwin wrote in an order denying class certification.
"Complex conflict of law questions are involved."
trip insurance, or even enemas," he wrote.
representatives here are unsophisticated," he wrote.
their claims atypical," he wrote.
the batch, and no plaintiff has produced a double thick pill.
wrongful death. Others claimed only economic damages.
Charleston Area 28 Bridgeside Blvd.
fraud against their agent, and vicariously against the Company.
asserting that the Company has violated California insurance laws.
subject to final court approval.
Operations and International Insurance Operations.
lawsuit under California Proposition 65.
results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.
March 30, 2007 to August 7, 2008.
A second putative class action lawsuit captioned "Benjamin et al.
2006 through August 7, 2008.
expected Opposition to that Motion.
on the management of its wireless spectrum interests.
v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company, et al., Case No.
from charging their employees for necessary business expenses.
to the company's June 8, 2010, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
in cash. The complaints do not define a putative class period.
fiduciary duty and costs and attorneys' fees.
supplements" that "burn fat and allow people to lose weight . . .
developed and "used to treat low blood pressure."
chromatography confirms" the presence of Oxilofrine.
tested positive for banned substances, according to the complaint.
The class seeks damages for fraud.
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL G. LANGAN, L.L.C.
OF THE FACILITIES OF PLACENTIA-LINDA HOSPITAL.
you of facts that affect your legal rights.
the Hospital's facilities. The Hospital denies these allegations.
Miguel M. de la O, Esq.
who is still living as of April 30, 2010.
embroidered on the fabric covering on the top of the head support.
websites, from August 2009 through April 2010 for about $100.
federal district court in Providence.
custody, no "significant relationship" is required.
OF THE FACILITIES OF SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL-BARTLETT.
power company was responsible for a blaze that cost 119 lives.
vibration protector to guard against metal fatigue.
fallen sparking line about 11.45am on February 7, 2009.
Victoria and located in a windy, bushfire-prone area.
network was privatized in 1999.
could not identify rust and wire deterioration.
wire was not sitting correctly inside its housing.
failures have had very tragic consequences."
basis. The writ seeks the case to be decided by a jury.
Inc. is in the hands of a Humboldt County jury.
that spent over 100 days in trial.
'Let's provide the best, most loving care we can.'"
come no one else in the industry is confused?"
disregard for the well-being of their patients.
too low to begin with.
"They try to keep staffing numbers as low as possible," she said.
evidence over the past few months.
The case was scheduled to resume Monday.
(iv) unlawfully converted certain earned wages.
attorneys' fees and expenses to plaintiffs' counsel.
entered a judgment in the company's favor.
complaint in the Federal Court Action.
company, filed an answer responding to the complaint.
motion was granted on September 30, 2009.
Court Action that arose prior to Jan. 28, 2009.
manages a casino for a Native American tribe.
interim financial results for the first three quarters of 2007.
bio-fuel, pulp and food processing industries.
The company has established provisions totaling R$24,000 at Dec.
31, 2008, in respect of all of these claims.
R$1,016,000 to address labor claims.
Commission for the year ended Dec. 31, 2008.
December 2008 through December 2009 for between $7 and $9.
company's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.
1971, and who also meet certain other specified criteria.
rewards, and risk and capital management.
seeking damages of over $100 million.
conformed with the Court's ruling.
under the applicable federal pleading standards.
who is a citizen of Illinois.
state. The additional briefing was due May 19, 2010.
alleged substantially the same matters and have been consolidated.
Complaint (Civil Action No. 09-cv-00780-REB-KLM).
the Company's securities between May 21, 2008 and March 31, 2009.
damages and costs of the legal action.
injury, or debilitating and chronic pain.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

v.