Source: http://www.carsandracingstuff.com/library/government/310US344.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 00:44:36+00:00

Document:
Case:   UNITED STATES V. TRUCKING CO.
TO DETERMINE THE QUESTION OF UNDUE PREFERENCE AND DISCRIMINATION.  P.
MOTION, WITHOUT COMPLAINT BY SHIPPERS.  P. 353.
GENERALLY, OF THE NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM, AND OF THE PUBLIC.
UNITED STATES ET AL. V. CHICAGO HEIGHTS TRUCKING CO. ET AL.
SHIPMENTS BEYOND THEIR BREAK-BULK DISTRIBUTION CENTER.
CARLOAD RATES, WHICH THE FORWARDER CHARGED THE OWNER OF A SHIPMENT.
RATES CAN BE USED BY FEW, IF ANY, SHIPPERS, EXCEPT THE FORWARDERS."
SIMILAR CIRCUMSTANCES AND CONDITIONS, IN VIOLATION OF SECTION 216(D)."
EVIDENCE HAS LED TO THESE OPPOSING CONCLUSIONS.
FILE WITH THE INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION."
THEM TO DENY FORWARDERS THE ADVANTAGE OF THEIR PUBLISHED RATES.
THAT FORWARDERS COULD WITHOUT DISCRIMINATION BE GIVEN LOWER L.T.L.
ADVANCED IN BOTH THE MAJORITY AND MINORITY OPINIONS OF THE COMMISSION.
DISCRIMINATION WHEN "UNDUE," "UNJUST," "UNFAIR," AND "UNREASONABLE."
THE REPORT WAS BY THE COMMISSION, 17 M.C.C. 573.
FN4  28 U.S. CODE, 45, 45(A), 47(A), 345.
FN7  SEE SEC. 217(A), (B).
DERIVED BY THE RESPONDENTS FROM LOCAL RATES "PER HUNDRED POUNDS  ..
UPOON THE WHOLE, IS LESS THAN" THAT PRODUCED BY THE SUSPENDED RATES.
FN9  SEE, E.G., EXPORT SHIPPING CO. V. WABASH RAILROAD CO., 14 I.C.C.
FREIGHT, INC., COMMON CARRIER APPLICATION, 8 M.C.C. 211.
FN10  INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMM'N V. DELAWARE, L. & W.R. CO., 220 U.S.
FN12  ACME FAST FREIGHT, INC. V. UNITED STATES, 309 U.S. 638.
POINT OF DELIVERY, ORDERED DISMISSED).
FN17  LEHIGH VALLEY R. CO. V. UNITED STATES, 243 U.S. 444.
FN20  CF. INLAND STEEL CO. V. UNITED STATES, 306 U.S. 153, 157.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.