Source: http://il.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20180720_0001544.SIL.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 17:25:43+00:00

Document:
MR. BALDWIN, JOHN DOE 1, MR. DUNCAN, JOHN DOE 2, NURSE JANE DOE, and JANE DOE 1, Defendants.
In Brady v. IDOC, No. 17-cv-883-NJR (S.D. Ill. Aug. 21, 2017), Plaintiff Harley M. Brady, an inmate of the Illinois Department of Corrections (“IDOC”) currently housed in Lawrence Correctional Center (“Lawrence”), brought suit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for deprivations of his constitutional rights allegedly occurring at Lawrence. Pursuant to George v. Smith, 507 F.3d 605 (7th Cir. 2007), an access to the courts claim was severed from that initial action to form the basis for this action, No. 17-cv-1203-NJR.
On December 4, 2017, the Court screened the severed action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. (Doc. 7). The action did not survive preliminary review and was dismissed without prejudice and with leave to amend. Id. On April 16, 2018, after receiving three extensions, Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint. (Doc. 16). The Amended Complaint is now before the Court for preliminary review pursuant to § 1915A.
Plaintiff is in IDOC custody as a result of his convictions in La Salle County, Illinois, for armed robbery and unlawful possession of a weapon by a felon (No. 13-cf-202). See People v. Brady, 2017 IL App (3d) 150184-U, appeal denied, 98 N.E.3d 37 (Ill. 2018). According to the Amended Complaint, prior to sentencing, Plaintiff requested that certain officials release his mental health records. Plaintiff intended to have these records included in his presentence investigation report (“PSI”). The records were never released, and Plaintiff's grievances and complaints pertaining to the unreleased records were not adequately addressed. Plaintiff's sentencing proceeded, without the mental health records, and his subsequent motion to reconsider sentencing was denied. Plaintiff contends that, because the mental health records were not included in his PSI, he did not receive a fair sentencing hearing. In connection with these claims, Plaintiff has named the officials allegedly involved in failing to release the records and/or the officials who allegedly failed to address his grievances. Plaintiff claims that Defendants deprived him of due process and/or access to the courts. He also brings an Illinois common-law negligence claim. Plaintiff seeks declaratory relief, injunctive relief, and monetary damages.

References: v. 
 § 1983
 v. 
 § 1915
 § 1915
 v.