Source: https://www.scribd.com/document/321206892/Leslie-Werth-v-United-States-4th-Cir-2012
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 13:50:34+00:00

Document:
CARUFE v. INTERCONTINENTAL HOTELS GROUP RESOURCES, INC.
for Appellant Harry Rhyne McCall.
motorcyclists who decline to abide by societal rules and laws.
to maintain compliance with internal rules.
weekly chapter meetings, called church, take place.
leadership of the organization also occur on a consistent basis.
Werth was the president of the Copper Region.
Outlaws in their efforts to dominate a particular territory.
undercover agents had set up a clubhouse in the Petersburg area.
had wired the clubhouse for video and audio recording.
Outlaws activities in a number of different states.
subsequently arrested and charged with various offenses.
serving as a pool of potential new Outlaws members.
violations, illegal gambling, and weapons violations.
2), see 18 U.S.C. 1959(a)(6).
(Count 4), see 18 U.S.C. 924(c) and 2.
a reckless driving citation, and a speeding ticket.
incidents at trial and objecting to the document request.
exculpatory, relevant, or admissible information.
the cross-examination of the agents about these incidents.
error, see United States v. Trevino, 89 F.3d 187, 193 (4th Cir.
for disclosure of documents related to Grabman.
incident had been purged according to ATF protocol.
failed to raise them on appeal and has therefore waived them.
See United States v. Brooks, 524 F.3d 549, 556 n.11 (4th Cir.
documents were available to the government from another source.
does not extend to information not in its possession).
the government suppressed favorable evidence.
that investigation to the defense.
proposed extension of Brady difficult even to understand.
exculpatory evidence does not constitute a Brady violation.).
Ozbolt, we find that the court did not abuse its discretion.
raised by evidence sought to be adduced.
Leake, 642 F.2d 715, 719 (4th Cir. 1981).
considered the proper factors and did not abuse its discretion.
(B), Rosga advances two additional arguments on appeal.
shooting of a Hells Angels member.
later admitted the evidence without limitation.
made two errors at sentencing.
sentences for substantive and procedural errors.
States v. Hornsby, 666 F.3d 296, 312 (4th Cir. 2012).
factual findings, however, for clear error.
v. Powell, 680 F.3d 350, 359 (4th Cir. 2012).
conduct under U.S.S.G. 1B1.3(a) (2010).
finding the shooting to be relevant conduct.
composed of the statutory maximum on Count 1, see 18 U.S.C.
1963(a), and a concurrent 36-month sentence on Count 2.
the district court did not abuse its discretion.
argument that he makes now on appeal.
waived this claim of error.
raised are waived on appeal.).
use and distribution of drugs.
need not have committed the substantive offense himself.
primary purpose of the clubhouses.
the purposes of the clubhouses.
913 F.2d 211, 220 (5th Cir. 1990).
preserved this challenge, it would be without merit.
II(A) & (B), Timbers raises several other arguments.
permitting the government to present evidence of an assault.
American male and restaurant patron.
the racial motivation underlying the attack.
permitting the government to introduce evidence of the assault.
Lighty, 616 F.3d 321, 352 (4th Cir. 2010).
to establish their dominance in order to control the territory.
introduce evidence of the assault.
indictment for which he was convicted, Counts 1-3.
doubt. United States v. Burgos, 94 F.3d 849, 862 (4th Cir.
distributed cocaine on several occasions.
tampering was supported by direct testimony from Agent Ozbolt.
of a rival motorcycle gang.
search for members of the rival gang.
uphold a RICO conspiracy conviction.
furthering or facilitating the criminal endeavor.).
1959(a)(3) and 2; Va. Code Ann. 18.2-22, -51, -282.
conspiracy to commit the substantive offense in Count 2.
United States v. Ramos-Cruz, 667 F.3d 487, 499 (4th Cir.
to assert control over the territory.
court did not err in denying the motion for acquittal.
which can be resolved summarily.
evidence was used at trial.
motion); United States v. Civella, 666 F.2d 1122, 1130 (8th Cir.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 

v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.