Source: https://patents.google.com/patent/US8641862B2/en
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 19:03:34+00:00

Document:
Plasma is generated using elemental hydrogen, a weak oxidizing agent, and a fluorine containing gas. An inert gas is introduced to the plasma downstream of the plasma source and upstream of a showerhead that directs gas mixture into the reaction chamber where the mixture reacts with the high-dose implant resist. The process removes both the crust and bulk resist layers at a high strip rate, and leaves the work piece surface substantially residue free with low silicon loss.
This application is a divisional of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/251,305, filed Oct. 14, 2008, titled “High Dose Implantation Strip (HDIS) in H2Base Chemistry,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/712,253, now abandoned, filed Feb. 27, 2007, titled “Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing,” which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/011,273, issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,202,176, filed Dec. 13, 2004, and titled “Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing.” All of these applications are incorporated herein by this reference in their entireties and for all purposes.
The present invention pertains to methods and apparatuses to remove or strip photoresist material and removing related residues from a work piece surface. Particularly, this application relates to methods and apparatus for stripping resist after ion implant or plasma assisting doping implant (low dose or high-dose implanted resist).
Photoresist is a light sensitive material used in certain fabrication processes to form a patterned coating on a work piece, e.g., a semiconductor wafer, during processing. After exposing the photoresist coated surface to a pattern of high energy radiation, a portion of the photoresist is removed to reveal the surface below, leaving the rest of the surface protected. Semiconductor processes such as etching, depositing, and ion implanting are performed on the uncovered surface and the remaining photoresist. After performing one or more semiconductor processes, the remaining photoresist is removed in a strip operation.
During ion implantation, dopant ions, e.g., ions of boron, boron difluoride, indium, gallium, thallium, phosphorous, arsenic, antimony, bismuth, or germanium, are accelerated toward a work piece target. The ions implant in exposed regions of the work piece as well as in the remaining photoresist surface. The process may form well regions (source/drain) and lightly doped drain (LDD) and doubled diffused drain (DDD) regions. The ion implant impregnates the resist with the implant species and depletes the surface of hydrogen. The outer layer or crust of the resist forms a carbonized layer that may be much denser than the underlying bulk resist layer. These two layers have different thermal expansion rates and react to stripping processes at different rates.
The difference between the outer layer and bulk layer is quite pronounced in post high-dose ion implant resist. In high-dose implantation, the ion dose may be greater than 1×1015 ions/cm2 and the energy may be from 10 Kev to greater than 100 keV. Traditional high dose implantation strip (HDIS) processes employ oxygen chemistries where monatomic oxygen plasma is formed away from the process chamber and then directed at the work piece surface. The reactive oxygen combines with the photoresist to form gaseous by-products which is removed with a vacuum pump. For HDIS, additional gases are needed to remove the implanted dopants with oxygen.
Primary HDIS considerations include strip rate, amount of residue, and film loss of the exposed and underlying film layer. Residues are commonly found on the substrate surface after HDIS and stripping. They may result from sputtering during the high-energy implant, incomplete removal of crust, and/or oxidation of implant atoms in the resist. After stripping, the surface should be residue free or substantially residue free to ensure high yield and eliminate the need for additional residue removal processing. Residues may be removed by overstripping, i.e., a continuation of the strip process past the point nominally required to remove all photoresist. Unfortunately, in conventional HDIS operations, overstripping sometimes removes some of the underlying functional device structure. At the device layer, even very little silicon loss from the transistor source/drain regions may adversely affect device performance and yield, especially for ultra shallow junction devices fabricated at the <32 nm design rule or below.
What is needed therefore are improved and methods and apparatus for stripping photoresist and ion implant related residues, especially for HDIS, which minimizes silicon loss and leaves little or no residue while maintaining an acceptable strip rate.
The present invention addresses the aforementioned need by providing improved methods and an apparatus for stripping photoresist and removing ion implant related residues from a work piece surface. Plasma is generated using elemental hydrogen, a weak oxidizing agent, and a fluorine containing gas. In certain embodiments, an inert gas is introduced to the plasma downstream of the plasma source and upstream of a showerhead, which directs gas into the reaction chamber. The plasma-activated gases flowing together with the inert gas reacts with the high-dose implant resist, removing both the crust and bulk resist layers, leaving the work piece surface substantially residue free with low silicon loss.
In one aspect of the invention, methods involve removing material from a work piece in a process chamber according to the following operations: introducing a gas comprising elemental hydrogen, a weak oxidizing agent, and a fluorine containing gas into a plasma source, generating a plasma from the gas introduced into the plasma source, and introducing an inert gas downstream of the plasma source and upstream of the work piece. The plasma-activated gas travels toward a work piece, and is combined with the inert gas upstream of a showerhead in the reaction chamber. The electrically charged species in the plasma may be discharged or partially discharged when they contact the showerhead.
The plasma-activated gas comprising elemental hydrogen, the weak oxidizing agent, and the fluorine containing gas flows, together with the inert gas, to the work piece and reacts with the material from the work piece. Examples of weak oxidizing agents include carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide, water, hydrogen peroxide, or combinations of these. The weak oxidizing agent is preferably carbon dioxide. The fluorine containing gas may be carbon tetrafluoride, other fluorocarbons including hydrofluorocarbons, elemental fluorine, nitrogen trifluoride, sulfur hexafluoride, combinations of these, and the like. The fluorine containing gas is preferably carbon tetrafluoride. The inert gas may be argon, helium, nitrogen, combinations of these, and the like. The preferred inert gas is argon. The gas introduced into the plasma source may be premixed or not, and may include about 1% to 99%, or about 0.1% to about 10% or about 3% to 5% by volume of the weak oxidizing agent. The inert gas may be introduced at a volumetric flow rate of about 0.15 and 10 times, or about 2 times, the volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen. At the work piece, the gas may include at most about 1% by volume of the weak oxidizing agent species and about 0.1 to 0.5% by volume of the fluorine containing gas species.
In certain embodiments, the material removed from the work piece surface is a high-dose implant resist. The work piece may be a 300 mm wafer. The plasma may be remotely generated using RF power between about 300 watts and about 10 kilo-watts. The temperature of the work piece may be about 160 to 500 degrees Celsius when contacted by the gas. The process pressure may be between about 300 mTorr and 2 Torr.
According to various embodiments, the a high-dose implant resist is removed from the work piece surface at a rate that is at least about 100 nm/min and silicon is removed from the work piece surface at an overall rate of no greater than about 4 nm/min. The resulting work piece is substantially residue free of the high-dose implanted resist after removal, and less than about 3 angstroms silicon is lost from an underlying silicon layer.
Another aspect of this invention relates to multi-step methods of removing high-dose implanted resist from a work piece surface in a reaction chamber. The methods include removing a first portion of the material by introducing, at a first total flow rate, a first gas comprising elemental hydrogen, a weak oxidizing agent, and with or without a fluorine containing gas into a plasma source, generating a first plasma from the first gas introduced into the plasma source, introducing a first inert gas downstream of the plasma source and upstream of the work piece, and reacting a first portion of the material from the work piece with the mixture. The methods also include removing a second portion of the material by introducing, at a second total flow rate, a second gas comprising hydrogen and a weak oxidizing agent and with or without a fluorine containing gas into a plasma source, generating a second plasma from the second gas introduced into the plasma source, introducing a second inert gas downstream of the plasma source and upstream of the work piece, and reacting a second portion of the material from the work piece. The first and second gas compositions are different. In certain embodiments, at least one of the first or the second gas includes a fluorine containing gas. At the end of the removal process, in certain embodiments, the work piece is substantially residue free and has had less than about 3 angstroms of silicon lost from an underlying silicon layer. The removing a second portion operation may occur before removing the first portion operation. In certain embodiments, the one or more of the removing operations are repeated one or more times. These removing operations may occur in a same or different reaction stations in the reaction chamber.
In yet another aspect, the present invention pertains to an apparatus for removing material from a work piece surface comprising a reaction chamber and a controller. The reaction chamber includes a plasma source, a gas inlet for introducing a gas mixture comprising elemental hydrogen into the plasma source, a gas inlet for introducing an inert gas downstream of the plasma source and upstream of the work piece, a showerhead positioned downstream of the gas inlet, and a work piece support downstream of the showerhead. The work piece support includes a pedestal and temperature-controlling mechanism to control a temperature of a work piece supported on the work piece support. The controller is configured to execute a set of instructions, including instructions to introduce a gas comprising hydrogen, a weak oxidizing agent, and a fluorine containing gas into a plasma source, generate a plasma from the gas introduced into the plasma source, introduce an inert gas downstream of the plasma source and upstream of the work piece, and optionally to repeat the introduce a gas, generate a plasma, and introduce an inert gas instructions using different flow rates and gas compositions. The plasma source used in accordance with the methods and apparatus of the invention may be any of a number of conventional plasma sources. For example, an RF ICP source may be used.
The process chamber used in accordance with the methods and apparatus of the invention may be any suitable process chamber. The process chamber may be one chamber of a multi-chambered apparatus or it may be part of a single chamber apparatus. In certain embodiments, the reaction chamber includes a plurality of stations, where at least one station includes a plasma source, a plurality of gas inlets, a showerhead, and a work piece support.
These and other features and advantages of the present invention will be described in more detail below with reference to the associated drawings.
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration showing an apparatus according to certain embodiments of the claimed invention and suitable for practicing the methods of the claimed invention.
FIG. 2A to 2D depicts various stages of semiconductor fabrication before and after ion implantation and stripping operations.
FIG. 3 is a process flow diagram showing various operations in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention.
FIGS. 4A to 4D depicts before and after strip SEM photos of photoresist pattern stripped under various conditions in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 5A is a plot of silicon loss for HDIS using various carbon dioxide flow rates in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
FIG. 5B is a plot of silicon loss for HDIS using various carbon tetrafluoride flow rates in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
In the following detailed description of the present invention, numerous specific embodiments are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, as will be apparent to those skilled in the art, the present invention may be practiced without these specific details or by using alternate elements or processes. In other instances well-known processes, procedures and components have not been described in detail so as not to unnecessarily obscure aspects of the present invention.
In this application, the terms “work piece”, “semiconductor wafer”, “wafer” and “partially fabricated integrated circuit” will be used interchangeably. One skilled in the art would understand that the term “partially fabricated integrated circuit” can refer to a silicon wafer during any of many stages of integrated circuit fabrication thereon. The following detailed description assumes the invention is implemented on a wafer. However, the invention is not so limited. The work piece may be of various shapes, sizes, and materials. In addition to semiconductor wafers, other work pieces that may take advantage of this invention include various articles such as displays, printed circuit boards, and the like.
As mentioned previously, the methods and apparatus of the invention may be used to efficiently and effectively to remove photoresist materials after high-dose ion implantation. The invention is not limited to high-dose implant strip (HDIS). The invention is also not limited to any particular category of dopants implanted. For instance, described methods and apparatus may be effectively used with stripping after medium or low dose implant. Although specific dopant ions such as boron, arsenic, and phosphorous are discussed, the described methods and apparatus may be effectively used to strip resist impregnated with other dopants, such as nitrogen, oxygen, carbon, germanium, and aluminum.
The methods and apparatus of the present invention use plasmas that are produced from gases that contain hydrogen. The gases also contain a weak oxidizing agent and a fluorine containing gas. One skilled in the art will recognize that the actual species present in the plasma may be a mixture of different ions, radicals, and molecules derived from the hydrogen, weak oxidizing agent, and fluorine containing gas. It is noted that other species may be present in the reaction chamber, such as small hydrocarbons, carbon dioxide, water vapor and other volatile components as the plasma reacts with and breaks down the organic photoresist and other residues. One of skill in the art will also recognize that the initial gas/gases introduced into the plasma is/are often different from the gas/gases that exist in the plasma as well as the gas/gases contact the work piece surface during strip.
FIG. 1 is a schematic illustration of an apparatus 100 according to certain embodiments of the claimed invention. Apparatus 100 has a plasma source 101 and a process chamber 103 separated by a showerhead assembly 105. Plasma source 101 is connected to gas inlet 111. Showerhead 109 forms the bottom of showerhead assembly 105. Inert gas inlets 113 are downstream of plasma source 101 and upstream of wafer 123 and showerhead 109. Inside process chamber 103, a wafer 123 with photoresist/dry etch byproduct material rests on a platen (or stage) 117. Platen 117 may be fitted with a temperature control mechanism that may heat or cool a wafer on the platen as necessary. In some embodiments, platen 117 is also configured for applying a bias to wafer 123. Low pressure is attained in reaction chamber 103 via vacuum pump and conduit 119.
In operation, a gas is introduced via gas inlet 111 to the plasma source 101. The gas introduced to the plasma source contains the chemically active species that will be ionized in the plasma source to form a plasma. Gas inlet 111 may be any type of gas inlet and may include multiple ports or jets. Plasma source 101 is where the active species of the gas introduced to the source are generated to form a plasma. In FIG. 1, an RF plasma source is shown with induction coils 115, which are energized to form the plasma. An inert gas is introduced via gas inlets 113 upstream of the showerhead and downstream of the plasma source. The inert gas mixes with the plasma. Gas inlets 113 may be any type of gas inlets and may include multiple ports or jets to optimize mixing the inert gas with the plasma. Showerhead 109 directs the plasma/inert gas mixture into process chamber 103 through showerhead holes 121. There may be any number and arrangement of showerhead holes 121 to maximize uniformity of the plasma/gas mixture in process chamber 103. Showerhead assembly 105, which may be electrically grounded or have an applied voltage, may capture and discharge some ions and thereby change the composition of the gas flowing into process chamber 103: i.e., the gas will contain an increased proportion of neutral species. As mentioned, wafer 123 may be temperature controlled and/or a RF bias may be applied. The plasma/inert gas mixture removes the photoresist/etch byproduct material from the wafer.
In some embodiments of the claimed invention, the apparatus does not include showerhead assembly 105 and showerhead 109. In these embodiments, the inert gas inlets 113 introduce the inert gas directly into the process chamber where it mixes with the plasma upstream of wafer 115. Various configurations and geometries of the plasma source 101 and induction coils 115 may be used. For example, induction coils 115 may loop around the plasma source 101 in an interlaced pattern. In another example, the plasma source 101 may be shaped as a dome instead of a cylinder.
Suitable plasma apparatuses include the Gamma 2100, 2130 I2CP (Interlaced Inductively Coupled Plasma), G400, and GxT offered by Novellus Systems, Inc. of San Jose, Calif. Other apparatuses include the Fusion line from Axcelis Technologies Inc. of Rockville, Md., the TERA21 from PSK Tech Inc. in Korea, and the Aspen tool from Mattson Technology Inc, in Fremont, Calif.
FIG. 2A to 2D depicts various stages of semiconductor fabrication before and after ion implantation and stripping operations. FIG. 2A shows a semiconductor substrate 201 coated with photoresist material 203. The substrate 201 may include one or more layers of deposited film, e.g., oxide film, silicide contact, and/or polysilicon film, or may be a bare silicon substrate, including for example a silicon-on-insulator type substrate. Initially, the photoresist material coats the entire substrate surface. The photoresist is then exposed to patterned radiation generated through a mask and developed to remove a portion of the material, e.g., the opening 204 shown in FIG. 2A between the remaining photoresist materials 203.
The substrate is then exposed to an ion implant process. During ion implant, the surface of the work piece or wafer is implanted with dopant ions. The process may be, for example, a plasma-immersion ion implantation (PIII) or ion beam implantation. The ions bombard the substrate surface, including the exposed silicon layer 201 and the photoresist 203. With high energy ion implantation, small amounts of the underlying material 207 may be sputtered to the photoresist sidewalls. See FIG. 2B. This material may include some of the implant species, other material in the plasma or ion beam, and by-products of the implantation. They include silicon, aluminum, carbon, fluorine, titanium, other contact materials such as cobalt, and oxygen in both elemental and compound form. The actual species depend on the composition of the substrate before ion implant, the photoresist, and the implanted species.
At the exposed silicon layer 201, a doped region 209 is created. The ion energy or intensity of the bombardment determines the depth or thickness of the doped region. The density of the ion flux determines the extent of doping.
The ions also impregnate the photoresist surface creating a crust layer 205. The crust layer 205 may be carbonized and highly cross-linked polymer chains. The crust is usually depleted of hydrogen and impregnated with the implant species. The crust layer 205 is denser than the bulk resist layer 203. The relative density depends on the ion flux while the thickness of the crust layer depends on the ion energy.
This crust layer 205 is harder to strip than the bulk photoresist 203 below. Removal rates of the crust layer may be 50% or 75% slower than the underlying bulk photoresist. The bulk photoresist contains relatively high levels of chemically bonded nitrogen and some of its original casting solvent. At elevated wafer temperature, e.g., above 150 to above 200° C., the bulk resist can outgas and expand relative to the crust layer. The entire photoresist can then “pop” as the underlying bulk photoresist builds up pressure under the crust. Photoresist popping is a source of particles and process defects because the residues are especially hard to clean from the wafer surface and chamber internal parts. With high-dose ion implantation, the density difference between the crust and underlying bulk photoresist layer is even higher. The crust may also be thicker.
FIG. 2C shows the substrate after a strip that fails to completely remove the photo resist 205 and the sidewall sputter residue 207. The sidewall sputter residue 207 may include particles that do not form a volatile compound under conventional strip chemistries. These particles may remain after a conventional strip operation. The residue may also include oxides of implanted species formed with the reactive oxygen used in the conventional strip chemistry, such as boron oxide and arsenic oxide. Portions of the crust 205 may also remain on the substrate. Crust sidewalls and corners at the bottom of photoresist vias may be hard to strip because of geometries.
These residue particles may be removed by overstripping in some cases, using fluorinated chemistry, or wet cleaning the wafer. Overstripping in conventional oxygen chemistry has been found to cause unwanted silicon oxidation but still not remove boron oxide and arsenic oxide residues if present. Using fluorinated compounds in plasmas generated in accordance with this invention produces fluorine radicals that can form volatile boron fluoride and arsenic fluoride. This helps remove residues but may unfortunately also etch underlying silicon and silicon oxide from the substrate. Use of the particular strip fluorinated chemistries in accordance with embodiments of this invention mitigates this problem.
Silicon loss is a function of resist thickness, crust thickness, and percent overstrip. Longer and more aggressive stripping to remove thicker resist can also remove more silicon. For resist with thicker crust, the difference between the crust layer and bulk resist layer is even more pronounced. The thicker crust sidewalls and corners are even harder to strip. Thus, strip processes designed to remove thick crust also tends to remove more silicon. Overstrip may be used to address resist uniformity and geometries in addition to residue removal. Overstrip is a continuation of the strip process past the point nominally required to remove all photoresist. If the photoresist is totally removed in some areas of the wafer but not others, continuation of the strip process would cause additional material, typically silicon and silicon oxide, to be removed from areas that are already stripped. Typical overstrip is about 100%.
FIG. 2D shows the substrate after all the residues has been removed. Preferably, the residue is removed without additional silicon loss or oxidation and with minimum delay. Even more preferably, the strip process leaves no residue and thus reduces the number of process steps.
The disclosed process and apparatus of the present invention use a hydrogen-based plasma chemistry with a weak oxidizing agent and a fluorine-containing gas to achieve a substantially residue free strip process with minimal silicon loss. The silicon loss is believed to be reduced because fluorine radicals in the plasma combine with hydrogen in the process gas to form hydrogen fluoride (HF) instead of remaining as fluorine radicals and etching underlying silicon. A combination of carbon dioxide and carbon tetrafluoride in the plasma has been demonstrated to strip away the post high dose implant photoresist leaving the substrate residue free or substantially residue free based on a SEM inspection or a defect inspection tool such as one from KLA-Tencor of Milpitas, Calif. This is accomplished with minimal overstrip (e.g., less than about 100% overstrip). According to various embodiments, a substantially residue free condition is indicated by less than about 3% inspected die having polymer defects as detected by a defect inspection tool.
An acceptable minimum silicon loss may be about 3 angstroms or less, preferably less than about 1 angstrom. Device requirements drive this minimum silicon loss regardless of resist thickness and other factors that may affect silicon loss. To reduce measurement errors, the silicon loss is typically measured by processing a wafer through the same strip process a number of times, for example, 5 times before measuring the silicon loss on the device structure using an electronic microscope, e.g., transmission electronic microscope. The average silicon loss thus obtained is used to compare various processes.
A hydrogen-containing gas, typically comprising elemental hydrogen, is introduced to the plasma source. Typically the gas introduced to the plasma source contains the chemically active species that will be ionized in the plasma source to form a plasma. The gas introduced to the plasma source includes a fluorine containing gas such as carbon tetrafluoride, other fluorocarbons including C2F6 and hydrofluorocarbons, elemental fluorine, nitrogen trifluoride, sulfur hexafluoride. In certain embodiments, the fluorine containing gas is carbon tetrafluoride. In certain specific embodiments, the gas introduced to the plasma source comprises between about 0.1% to about 3% carbon tetrafluoride by volume. The gas introduced to the plasma source may include a weak oxidizing agent such as carbon dioxide, carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, nitrogen oxide and/or water. In certain embodiments, the weak oxidizing agent is carbon dioxide.
According to various embodiments, the inlet gas may include between about 1 and 99 volume percent, about 80 and 99.9 volume percent, or about 95 volume percent molecular hydrogen, between about 0 and 99 volume percent or 0 and 10 volume percent weak oxidizing agent, and between about 0.1 and 10 volume percent fluorine containing compound(s). In certain embodiments, the inlet gas may include between about 95 to 99 volume percent molecular hydrogen, between about 0.1 and 3 volume percent weak oxidizing agent, and between about 0.1 and 1 volume percent fluorine containing compound(s). In specific embodiments, the gas introduced to the plasma source comprises about 95% to 99% elemental hydrogen, about 1-3% carbon dioxide, and about 1% or less carbon tetrafluoride, all by volume.
The gas introduced to the plasma source may be premixed, partially mixed or unmixed. Individual gas sources may flow into a mixing plenum before being introduced to the plasma source. In other embodiments, the different gases may separately enter the plasma source. The gas introduced to the plasma source may have different compositions when used in different reaction stations of a multistation chamber. For example in a 6-station chamber, station 1 or station 6 may employ process gases with relatively higher amounts of fluorine containing gas to remove the crust or the residue, respectively. One or more of the other stations may employ process gases with little or no fluorine containing gas. Process gases with no carbon dioxide or weak oxidizing agents may also be used.
Methods of stripping photoresist and etch materials using hydrogen-based plasmas with weak oxidizing agents are disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 7,288,484, which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety and for all purposes.
Various types of plasma sources may be used in accordance with the invention, including RF, DC, and microwave based plasma sources. In a preferred embodiment, a downstream RF plasma source is used. Typically, the RF plasma power for a 300 mm wafer ranges between about 300 Watts to about 10 Kilowatts. In some embodiments, the RF plasma power is between about 1000 Watts and 2000 Watts.
Various inert gases may be used in the stripping process. As explained, these gases are introduced downstream of the plasma source and upstream of the showerhead for mixing with the plasma. In a certain embodiments, the inert gas is argon or helium. In a specific embodiment, the inert gas is argon. However, any inert gas, including nitrogen and helium, may be used. In certain embodiments, the inert gas flow rate is between about 0.15 and 10.0 times the hydrogen flow rate. In certain specific embodiments, the inert gas flow rate is between about 1 and 3 times or about 2 times the hydrogen flow rate.
The inert gas inlet may be any one of various types of gas inlets and may include multiple ports or jets to facilitate mixing with the plasma. The angle of the inlet jets may also optimized to maximize mixing. In one embodiment, there are at least four inert gas inlet jets. In another embodiment, there are sixteen inlet jets. In certain specific embodiments the angle of the inlet jets, as measured from the bottom of the plasma source, is zero degrees so that the inert gas is injected perpendicular to the direction of flow of the plasma entering the showerhead assembly (or the process chamber if there is no showerhead assembly) from the plasma source. An angle of zero degrees also corresponds to a direction parallel to the face of the work piece. Of course, other inlet angles may be employed, although in many embodiments, the angles are generally parallel to the work piece face.
According to various embodiments of the present invention the plasma gas is distributed to the work surface via a showerhead assembly. The showerhead assembly may be grounded or have an applied voltage to attract some charge species while not affecting the flow of neutral species to the wafer, e.g., 0-1000 watt bias. Many of the electrically charged species in the plasma recombine at the showerhead. The assembly includes the showerhead itself which may be a metal plate having holes to direct the plasma and inert gas mixture into the reaction chamber. The showerhead redistributes the active hydrogen from the plasma source over a larger area, allowing a smaller plasma source to be used. The number and arrangement of the showerhead holes may be set to optimize strip rate and strip rate uniformity. If the plasma source is centrally located over the wafer, the showerhead holes are preferably smaller and fewer in the center of the showerhead in order to push the active gases toward the outer regions. The showerhead may have at least 100 holes. Suitable showerhead include the Gamma xPR showerhead or the GxT drop-in showerhead available from Novellus Systems, Inc. of San Jose, Calif.
In embodiments in which there is no showerhead assembly, the plasma and inert gas mixture enters the process chamber directly.
The process chamber may be any suitable reaction chamber for the strip operation being performed. It may be one chamber of a multi-chambered apparatus or it may simply be a single chamber apparatus. The chamber may also include multiple stations where different wafers are processed simultaneously. The process chamber may be the same chamber where the implant, etch, or other resist-mediated process takes place. In other embodiments, a separate chamber is reserved for the strip. Process chamber pressure may range from about 300 mTorr to 2 Torr. In certain embodiments, the pressure ranges from about 0.9 Ton to 1.1 Torr.
The process chamber includes one or more processing stations on which strip operations are performed. In certain embodiments, the one or more processing stations includes a preheat station, at least one strip station, and an over-ash station. Various features of the process chamber and the process station are disclosed in FIG. 1 and associated text. The wafer support is configured to support the wafer during processing. The wafer support may also transfer heat to and from the wafer during processing to adjust the wafer temperature as necessary. In certain embodiments, the wafer is supported on a plurality of minimum contacts and does not physically contact the wafer support surface plane. A spindle picks up the wafer and transfers the wafer from one station to another.
Suitable plasma chambers and systems include the Gamma 2100, 2130 I2CP (Interlaced Inductively Coupled Plasma), G400, and GxT offered by Novellus Systems, Inc. of San Jose, Calif. Other systems include the Fusion line from Axcelis Technologies Inc. of Rockville, Md., TERA21 from PSK Tech Inc. in Korea, and the Aspen from Mattson Technology Inc. in Fremont, Calif. Additionally, various strip chambers may be configured onto cluster tools. For example, a strip chamber may be added to a Centura cluster tool available from Applied Materials of Santa Clara, Calif.
In preferred embodiments, the work piece used in accordance with the methods and apparatus of the invention is a semiconductor wafer. Any size wafer may be used. Most modern wafer fabrication facilities use either 200 mm or 300 mm wafers. As disclosed above, the process and apparatus disclosed herein strips photoresist after a processing operation such as etching, ion implant, or deposition. The present invention is suitable for wafers having very small features or critical dimensions, e.g., sub 100 nm, at 65 nm, or at or less than 45 nm. The low silicon loss feature of the HDIS as disclosed is particularly suitable for very shallow junctions of advanced logic devices. The present invention is also specifically suitable for wafers undergoing front end of the line (FEOL) ion implantation, especially high-dose ion implantation.
The plasma-activated species reacts with the photoresist and sputter residue on the wafer. At the wafer, the reactive gas may include a number of plasma activated species, the inert gas, radicals, charged species, and gas by-products. The volume concentration of various hydrogen species may be about 20-80% of the gas at the wafer. The volume concentration of various fluorine species may be 0.01% to about 2% or less than 1%. The volume concentration of various species from the weak oxidizing agent may be 0.05 to about 5% or about 1.2%. These species may include H2*, H2 +, H+, H*, e−, OH, O*, CO, CO2, H2O, HF, F*, F−, CF, CF2, and CF3.
Process conditions may vary depending upon the wafer size. In some embodiments of the invention, it is desired to keep the work piece at a particular temperature during the application of plasmas to its surface. Wafer temperatures can range between about 110 degrees and about 500 degrees Celsius. To reduce the likelihood of photoresist popping described above, wafer temperature is preferably increased slowly until enough crust has been removed and photoresist popping ceases to be a concern. Initial station temperature may be about 110 degrees to about 200 degrees Celsius, for example, about 180 degrees Celsius. Later stations can use higher temperatures such as 285 degrees Celsius and about 350 degrees Celsius successfully with good strip rates.
FIG. 3 is a process flow diagram showing various operations in accordance with certain embodiments of the present invention. A wafer is positioned in a reaction chamber on a wafer support. At operation 301, a hydrogen-containing gas is introduced to a plasma source. A plasma is generated from the gas in operation 303. As more gas is added to the plasma source, the plasma flows downstream and mixes with an inert gas introduced at operation 305. Some of the charged species in the plasma may combine to form neutral, albeit activated, species. Together, the activated species and the inert gas flow through a showerhead face plate and react with photoresist on a wafer surface at operation 307. The reaction results in volatile by-products that are removed by the processing area with a vacuum pump at operation 309. The process may be repeated one or more times using different process parameters. For example, the wafer may be heated or cooled during iterations of the process. In another example, different initial hydrogen-containing gas and inert gas composition and flow rates may be used. Preferably, at least one of the iterations involves hydrogen-based gas including elemental hydrogen, carbon dioxide, and carbon tetrafluoride. One or more of the iterations may involve hydrogen-containing gas that does not include carbon dioxide or carbon tetrafluoride.
According to various embodiments, the various iterations may be designed to target different portions of the photoresist, for example, the post high-dose implant resist having a crust and bulk resist regions discussed above. The first strip iteration in a first strip station may be designed to strip the crust layer. The first strip iteration may involve generating a plasma using elemental hydrogen, carbon dioxide (or another weak oxidizing agent), and with or without carbon tetrafluoride (or another fluorine containing gas) to specifically strip the crust layer. When the crust layer is sufficiently thin or completely removed, a second strip iteration may strip the bulk resist along with the residue and the remaining crust layer, often at a higher wafer temperature. The second strip process may be performed in a different processing station from the first strip process. The second strip process may employ plasma generated without the weak oxidizing agent or the fluorine containing gas, or both. After the bulk resist is removed, yet another strip process employing different gas compositions may be designed to strip the residue, if any. This residue stripping process may employ a fluorine containing gas to remove any oxidized implant species. The strip iteration described above may be performed in any order or frequency depending on the number of processing stations and the composition of the photoresist to be stripped. One skilled in the art would be able to tailor the concepts discussed herein to strip thicker or thinner crust having lower or higher resistance to the strip chemistry. Further, the concepts discussed herein is applicable to other situations when more than one layer of photoresist having different properties are stripped by different using strip chemistries to target different resist layers.
In this example, the impacts of carbon dioxide and carbon tetrafluoride on residue were investigated. 300 mm sized wafers were patterned with 45 nm structures and ion implanted with an LDD (lightly doped drain) in the P+ region. The resulting post high dose implant resist was about 2000 angstroms thick with a crust about 630 angstroms thick.
The wafers were stripped in a strip chamber having 5 plasma stations. The plasma was generated with RF power at 2000 Watts. The wafers were exposed to the plasma-activated reactive gas for about 20 seconds at each station for a total of 97 seconds. The wafer support temperature was 350 degrees Celsius. Chamber pressure was 900 mTorr. Hydrogen flow rate was 6 slm (standard liters per minute), and downstream argon flow rate was 14 slm. Carbon dioxide flow rate was varied between 0 and 150 sccm. Carbon tetrafluoride flow rate was varied between 20 and 40 sccm. Note that these flow rates are total flow rates for the entire chamber with 5 plasma stations. Each station receives about ⅕ of the total flow rate.
SEM photos of the wafers before and after stripping with various plasma-activated reactive gases are depicted as FIGS. 4A to 4D. FIG. 4A depicts a small portion of the wafer before stripping. Structure 401 is the post high-dose implant resist. Pads 405 include structures 403 thereon where the photoresist was removed during the patterning process. Thus the HDIS process removes structure 401.
In the first wafer as depicted in FIG. 4B, 20 sccms of carbon tetrafluoride and 150 sccms of carbon dioxide were added to the hydrogen to form the plasma. Worm like residues 407 remained after the process. In the second wafer as depicted in FIG. 4C, 40 sccms of carbon tetrafluoride and 150 sccms of carbon dioxide were added to the hydrogen to form the plasma. The strip resulted in no residue, as shown in FIG. 4C. In yet another wafer as depicted in FIG. 4D, 40 sccms of carbon tetrafluoride and no carbon dioxide was added to the hydrogen to form the plasma. Worm like formation of residue 407 was again observed. This result shows that the addition of carbon dioxide with carbon tetrafluoride can yield residue free film in hydrogen-based HDIS.
In this example, the effects of carbon dioxide flow rate and carbon tetrafluoride flow rate on silicon loss were independently examined. Silicon loss for HDIS under the same process conditions as that of Example 1 was measured for carbon dioxide flow rates of 0, 50, 100, and 150 sccm while the carbon tetrafluoride flow rate was held constant at 40 sccm. The results are plotted in FIG. 5A. Silicon loss is lowest at carbon dioxide flow rate of 150 sccm and highest when no carbon dioxide is added. This result shows that some carbon dioxide in the plasma reduces silicon loss.
Silicon loss for HDIS under the same process conditions as that of Example 1 was also measured for carbon tetrafluoride flow rates of 0, 40, 60, 80, and 100 sccm while carbon dioxide flow rate was held constant at 150 sccm. The results are plotted in FIG. 5B. The silicon loss appears to peak at carbon tetrafluoride flow rates of 60 to 80 sccm.
These results show that silicon loss is affected by flow rates of carbon dioxide and carbon tetrafluoride. For a particular film, one skilled in the art would be able to design an HDIS process that minimizes silicon loss and leaves the film residue free.
In another example, the effect of using different gas compositions at different stations was investigated relative to silicon loss and strip residue. The process conditions were the same as that of Example 1, except that the wafer support temperature is 250 degrees Celsius. In a first recipe, carbon tetrafluoride was employed in all stations at a total flow rate of 40 sccm. In a second recipe, carbon tetrafluoride was delivered only to RF stations 1 and 2 at a total flow rate of 20 sccm (10 sccm per station). Carbon dioxide flow rate was held constant at 150 sccm.
In both cases residue free substrates were obtained after HDIS process. The average silicon losses were 8.1 Å per cycle in the first recipe and 6.7 Å in the second recipe, a reduction of about 17%. A cycle is a complete pass through the tool, including processing at all stations. This result shows that a sequential stripping process using different gas compositions can reduce silicon loss while maintaining residue free substrates.
In this example, the effect of short process time per station and lower carbon tetrafluoride flow rate was investigated. In the first recipe, no carbon tetrafluoride was added and process time was 20 seconds per station. In the second recipe, carbon tetrafluoride was added at 10 sccm with strip process time of 10 seconds per station. In both recipes the wafer support temperature was 285 degrees Celsius.
In the first recipe, without the carbon tetrafluoride in the plasma, residue was found after the strip. The average silicon loss per cycle was 1.93 Å. In the second recipe, with the reduced carbon tetrafluoride flow and reduced process, the substrate was residue free with an average silicon loss per cycle of 3.12 Å. Although the first recipe had the lower silicon loss, the substrate after the strip was not residue free. This result shows that a reduced carbon tetrafluoride flow rate may be used with shorter process time to yield a residue free substrate.
In this example, carbon tetrafluoride was introduced into the plasma source at different stations. In the first recipe, 5 sccm of carbon tetrafluoride was introduced in RF station 1. In the second recipe, 5 sccm of carbon tetrafluoride was introduced in RF station 3. Silicon loss was measured after the first cycle and after the fifth cycle and averaged. The other process parameters are the same as that of example 1.
The first recipe yielded a residue free substrate. Silicon loss after the first cycle with carbon tetrafluoride was 14.4 Å. Silicon loss after the fifth cycle was 18.6 Å. The average silicon loss per cycle decreased from 14.4 Å to 3.7 Å.
Small amounts of residue were observed on the substrate after HDIS with the second recipe. Silicon loss after the first cycle was 6.9 Å, less than that of the first recipe. Silicon loss after the fifth cycle was 10.3 Å. The average silicon loss per cycle decreased from 6.9 Å to 2.1 Å.
This result shows that silicon loss using this chemistry is a self-limiting reaction where majority of silicon loss takes place in the first cycle. Additional processing does not remove much more silicon. This is an advantage over the conventional oxygen with fluorine stripping chemistry where total silicon loss is proportional to processing time. In cases where overstripping is necessary, e.g., when photoresist thickness is not uniform, an oxygen chemistry would cause more silicon loss than the hydrogen chemistry as disclosed.
This result also shows that the first cycle silicon loss is reduced if carbon tetrafluoride is not used. One skilled in the art may be able to delay the introduction of carbon tetrafluoride to reduce the total silicon loss.
Note that experimental results for these specific examples are shown to clarify and illustrate the effectiveness of methods of the invention and are not meant to limit the invention to any particular embodiments.
concurrently introduce an inert gas to the second gas inlet such that the inert gas mixes with plasma from the plasma source downstream of the plasma source and upstream of the work piece support.
repeat the instructions to introduce the gas elemental hydrogen, oxidizing agent and fluorine containing gas into the plasma source, generate the plasma, and introduce the inert gas to the second gas inlet, including instructions to change a total flow rate of the elemental hydrogen, oxidizing agent, and fluorine containing gas.
3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the reaction chamber include multiple stations, each station comprising a separate set of the following components: a plasma source, a plurality of gas inlets, a showerhead, and a work piece support.
4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the inert gas is selected from a group comprising of argon, helium, nitrogen, and combination thereof.
5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the fluorine containing gas is selected from a group comprising of carbon tetrafluoride, elemental fluorine, nitrogen trifluoride, sulfur hexafluoride, fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons and combinations thereof.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the fluorine containing gas is CF4, C2F6, or NF3.
7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instructions further comprise setting a volumetric flow rate of the inert gas and a volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen such that the inert gas flow rate is between about 0.15 and 10 times volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen.
8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instructions further comprise setting a volumetric flow rate of the inert gas and a volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen such that the inert gas flow rate is between about 1 and 3 times volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen.
9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instructions further comprise instructions for setting a volumetric flow rate of the inert gas and a volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen such that the inert gas flow rate is about 2 times volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen.
10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the instructions further comprise instructions for maintaining a workpiece temperature of between about 160 degrees Celsius and 500 degrees Celsius.
12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the instructions further comprise instructions to repeat the instructions to introduce the gas elemental hydrogen, oxidizing agent and fluorine containing gas into the plasma source, generate the plasma, and introduce the inert gas to the second gas inlet, including instructions to change a total flow rate of the elemental hydrogen, oxidizing agent, and fluorine containing gas.
13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the reaction chamber include multiple stations, each station comprising a separate set of the following components: a plasma source, a plurality of gas inlets, a showerhead, and a work piece support.
14. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the inert gas is selected from a group comprising of argon, helium, nitrogen, and combination thereof.
15. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the fluorine containing gas is selected from a group comprising of carbon tetrafluoride, elemental fluorine, nitrogen trifluoride, sulfur hexafluoride, fluorocarbons, hydrofluorocarbons and combinations thereof.
16. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the fluorine containing gas is CF4, C2F6, or NF3.
17. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the instructions further comprise setting a volumetric flow rate of the inert gas and a volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen such that the inert gas flow rate is between about 0.15 and 10 times volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen.
18. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the instructions further comprise setting a volumetric flow rate of the inert gas and a volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen such that the inert gas flow rate is between about 1 and 3 times volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen.
19. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the instructions further comprise instructions for setting a volumetric flow rate of the inert gas and a volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen such that the inert gas flow rate is about 2 times volumetric flow rate of the elemental hydrogen.
20. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the instructions further comprise instructions for maintaining a workpiece temperature of between about 160 degrees Celsius and 500 degrees Celsius.
A. Kalnitsky and W. K. Chung, "Characterization and Optimization of a Single Wafer Downstream Plasma Stripper," Journal of the Electrochemical Society, vol. 135, No. 9, Sep. 1988, pp. 2338-2341.
Allowed Claims as of Aug. 12, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130.
Allowed Claims as of Aug. 12, 2011 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461.
Allowed Claims as of Feb. 17, 2012 for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305.
Allowed Claims as of Oct. 28, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930.
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096.
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653.
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 11/011,273.
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727.
Allowed Claims for U.S. Appl. No. 12/111,095.
Chen, et al., "Method for Post-Etch Cleans," U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096, May 1, 2002.
Chen, et al., "Method for Post-Etch Cleans," U.S. Appl. No. 12/111,095, filed Aug. 28, 2008.
Chen, et al., "Method for Post-Etch Cleans," U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130, filed Jul. 31, 2009.
Chen, et al., "Methods for Stripping Photoresist and/or Cleaning Metal Regions," U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633, filed Apr. 7, 2007.
Cheung, et al. "Enhanced Passivation Process to Protect Silicon Prior to High Dose Implant Strip," U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,503, filed Dec. 8, 2009.
Cheung, et al. "Low Damage Photoresist Strip Method for Low-K Dielectrics," U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601, filed Dec. 11, 2009.
Cheung, et al. "Ultra Low Silicon Loss High Dose Implant Strip," U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582, filed Dec. 11, 2009.
Cheung, et al., "Plasma Based Photoresist Removal System for Cleaning Post Ash Residue," U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930, filed May 12, 2005.
Chinese Office Action mailed Jul. 20, 2012, issued in Application No. 200810187894.4.
Final Office Action mailed Sep. 20, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633.
Final Office Action mailed Sep. 28, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633.
Goto et al., "Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing," Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653, filed Jul. 13, 2004.
Goto et al., "Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing," Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 11/011,273, filed Dec. 13, 2004.
Goto et al., "Enhanced Stripping of Low-K Films Using Downstream Gas Mixing," Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253, filed Feb. 27, 2007, pp. 1-28.
Goto, et al., "High Dose Implantation Strip (HDIS) in H2 Base Chemistry," Novellus Systems, Inc., U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305, filed Oct. 14, 2008.
Goto, et al., "Photoresist Strip Method for Low-K Dielectrics," U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727, filed Sep. 21, 2007.
Goto, et al., "Photoresist Strip Method for Low-K Dielectrics," U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461, filed Jul. 31, 2009.
Japanese Office Action mailed Sep. 25, 2012, issued in Application No. 2009-018046.
Kikuchi et al., Native Oxide Removal on Si Surfaces by NF3-Added Hydrogen and Water Vapor Plasma Downstream Treatment, JPN J. Appl. Phys. vol. 33 (1994), pp. 2207-2211, Part 1, No. 4B, Apr. 1994.
Notice of Allowance dated Jan. 24, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,230.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096 mailed Jan. 15, 2008.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jun. 15, 2007.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/011,273 mailed Nov. 28, 2006.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Oct. 28, 2011.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/548,801 mailed Feb. 17, 2010.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727 mailed May 1, 2009.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/111,095 mailed Apr. 3, 2009.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305 mailed Feb. 17, 2012.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130 mailed Aug. 12, 2011.
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461 mailed Aug. 12, 2011.
Notice of Allowance, dated Oct. 29, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633.
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Sep. 3, 2013, issued in Application No. 2009-018046.
Office Action mailed Dec. 15, 2009, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633.
Office Action mailed Jan. 27, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633.
Office Action mailed Jun. 6, 2011, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633.
Office Action mailed Mar. 30, 2012, for U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601.
Office Action mailed May 26, 2010, for U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633.
Partial European Search Report mailed Apr. 17, 2013, issued in Application No. 12181659.9.
S. Wolf and R.N. Tauber, (Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, vol. 1-Process Technology, Lattice Press, 1986), pp. 539-543.
S. Wolf and R.N. Tauber, (Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era, vol. 1—Process Technology, Lattice Press, 1986), pp. 539-543.
Singapore Second Written Opinion, dated Aug. 7, 2012, issued in Application No. 201104086-2.
Singapore Written Opinion and Search Report mailed Feb. 2, 2012, for Application No. 201104086-2.
Supplemental Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jul. 23, 2007.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,638, filed Oct. 17, 2011, entitled "Photoresist Strip Method for Low-K Dielectrics."
U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,689, filed Feb. 10, 2012, entitled "Plasma Based Photoresist Removal System for Cleaning Post Ash Residue"
U.S. Appl. No. 13/590,083, filed Aug. 20, 2012, entitled "Photoresist Strip Processes for Improved Device Integrity"
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096 mailed Jul. 27, 2007.
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jan. 10, 2006.
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Jul. 21, 2008.
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Mar. 8, 2007.
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Sep. 9, 2010.
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461 mailed May 26, 2011.
U.S. Final Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,230 mailed Apr. 26, 2012.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/137,096 mailed Jul. 11, 2003.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Apr. 5, 2007.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jul. 27, 2005.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Jun. 26, 2006.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/890,653 mailed Oct. 11, 2006.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Dec. 10, 2007.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Feb. 26, 2010.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Jun. 29, 2007.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Mar. 19, 2007.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Mar. 20, 2009.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed May 10, 2011.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Sep. 13, 2006.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/128,930 mailed Sep. 17, 2009.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Dec. 23, 2008.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Jan. 29, 2010.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Jul. 17, 2009.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/712,253 mailed Mar. 1, 2011.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/859,727 mailed Oct. 6, 2008.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/111,095 mailed Aug. 25, 2008.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/251,305 mailed Nov. 2, 2011.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/502,130 mailed Dec. 8, 2010.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/533,461 mailed Nov. 5, 2010.
U.S. Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/786,230 mailed Nov. 10, 2011.
US Final Office Action, dated Jan. 22, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,503.
US Final Office Action, dated May 13, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582.
US Final Office Action, dated May 15, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 11/696,633.
US Final Office Action, dated Sep. 5, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601.
US Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2013, U.S. Appl. No. 13/274,638.
US Office Action dated Feb. 22, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 13/370,689.
US Office Action, dated Feb. 12, 2013, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,601.
US Office Action, dated Jul. 27, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/963,503.
US Office Action, dated Sep. 6, 2012, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 12/636,582.
Woody K, Chung, "Low Damage, Downstream RF Plasma Ashing of High Energy, Heavily Doped Implanted Resists," Semicon Korea, Dec. 1989.
Woody K. Chung, "Downstream Plasma Removal of Mobile Ion Impurity From SIO2", Published Proceedings of the 8th International Plasma Processing Symposium, Fall 1990, 7 pages.

References: Application No. 200810187894
 Application No. 2009
 Application No. 2009
 Application No. 12181659
 Application No. 201104086
 Application No. 201104086