Source: https://www.paulogala.com.br/a-grande-revolucao-empirica-nos-estudos-de-desenvolvimento-economico-chegou/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 06:21:49+00:00

Document:
A grande revolução empírica nos estudos de desenvolvimento econômico chegou: tchau resíduo de Solow!
Com os novos bancos de dados de produção setorial e matrizes insumo produto, novas técnicas de big data e redes e novas bases empíricas de comércio não dá mais para ignorar: os modelos de crescimento ortodoxos baseados em grandes agregados falharam ao não perceber os detalhes do processo de Enriquecimento das nações (Modelos de solow e coisas do tipo. Nesses modelos não há setores nem produtos distintos). Deus está nos detalhes. Nos próximos anos veremos um tsunami de trabalhos empíricos usando big data de comércio internacional e dados setoriais de emprego mostrando o que os velhos estruturalistas sempre disseram: a estrutura importa! É só esperar para ver!
CANTORE, N. et al. Manufacturing as an engine of growth: Which is the best fuel? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, North-Holland, v. 42, p. 56–66, sep 2017.
CASELLI, F.; ESQUIVEL, G.; LEFORT, F. Reopening the convergence debate: A new look at cross-country growth empirics. Journal of Economic Growth, v. 1, n. 3, p. 363–89, 1996.
RODRIK, D.; MCMILLAN, M.; SEPULVEDA, C. (Ed.). Structural Change, Fundamentals, and Growth: A Framework and Case Studies. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2017.
MCMILLAN, M. S.; RODRIK, D. Globalization, Structural Change and Productivity Growth. Cambridge, 2011. (Working Paper Series, 17143).
GALA, P.; CAMARGO, J.; FREITAS, E. The economic commission for latin america and the caribbean (eclac) was right: scale-free complex networks and core-periphery patterns in world trade. Cambridge Journal of Economics, Oxford University Press, v. 42, n. 3, p. 633–651, apr 2018.
GALA, P. et al. Sophisticated jobs matter for economic complexity: An empirical analysis based on input-output matrices and employment data. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, v. 45, p. 1–8, jun 2018.
GALA, P.; ROCHA, I.; MAGACHO, G. The structuralist revenge: economic complexity as an important dimension to evaluate growth and development. Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, Centro de Economia Política, v. 38, n. 2, p. 219–236, jun 2018.
Hartmann, Dominik & Bezerra, Mayra & Lodolo, Beatrice & Pinheiro, Flávio L., 2019. “International trade, development traps, and the core-periphery structure of income inequality,” Hohenheim Discussion Papers in Business, Economics and Social Sciences 01-2019, University of Hohenheim, Faculty of Business, Economics and Social Sciences.
HAUSMANN, R.; RODRIK, D.; VELASCO, A. In: . The Washington Consensus Reconsidered. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. p. 324–355.
HIDALGO, C. A.; HAUSMANN, R. The building blocks of economic complexity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, National Academy of Sciences, v. 106, n. 26, p. 10570–5, jun 2009.
Pinheiro, Flávio L., et al. “Shooting Low or High: Do Countries Benefit from Entering Unrelated Activities?” arXiv preprint arXiv:1801.05352 (2018).
Jian Gao, Bogang Jun, Alex Pentland, Tao Zhou, and Cesar A. Hidalgo. Collective Learning in China’s Regional Economic Development. arXiv:1703.01369, 2017.
ROCHA, I. Manufacturing as driver of economic growth. PSL Quarterly Review, v. 71, n. 285, p. 103–138, jul 2018.
← Macroeconomia estruturalista: o que há de novo?

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.