Source: http://www.gerryarmstrong.org/50k/legal/a4/3091.php
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 00:50:47+00:00

Document:
continued to openly flout the authority of this Court, violating the Injunction issued by this Court in numerous respects, including the following: (1) During the period February 20, 1998 to July 10, 2000, Armstrong made a total of 131 postings on the Internet, each of which violated one or more provisions of the Injunction; (2) Armstrong traveled to Clearwater, Florida and on December 5, 1999 spoke before a public gathering sponsored by the Lisa McPherson Trust, a for-profit corporation, the purpose of which is to bring about the destruction of the Scientology religion; and (3) Armstrong traveled to Tampa, Florida and on December 10, 1999 gave an interview on radio station WMNF-AM, during which he again violated the terms of the Injunction.
Armstrong on May 2, 1996 (the " Judgment"); the Order and Judgment are collectively sometimes referred to as the "Injunction". The Injunction prohibits Armstrong from voluntarily assisting any persons litigating claims adverse to defined " Beneficiaries" including CSI, from making public statements regarding any of the Beneficiaries, and from creating and/or publishing "works" discussing any of the Beneficiaries.
Armstrong has also caused himself to be subpoenaed for deposition in a lawsuit against the Church in Clearwater, boasting that he initiated the contact with the plaintiff's attorney (id. at ¶14); gave a speech at a fund-raiser for an anti- Scientology group in Clearwater (id. at ¶15); traveled to Tampa, Florida for an interview at Radio Station WMNF AM where he again purposely violated the Injunction (Id. at ¶ 16), and in June 2000, journeyed to Denmark to provide information to anti-Scientology media there.
This Court should hold Armstrong in criminal contempt for his willful disobedience of the Injunction. Code of Civil Procedure § 1209, et seq ., provides this Court with the power to punish acts, such as Armstrong's, which are in " disobedience of any lawful . . . order of the court." Code Civ. Proc. § 1209(a)(5). See also, Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co. v. Superior Court (1968) 265 Cal.App.2d 370 (section 1209 contempt proceedings are special proceedings, criminal in character and intended to implement the inherent power of the court to enforce its lawful orders).
The declaration must show: (1) the rendition of a valid order; (2) the respondent's knowledge of the order; (3) the respondent's ability to comply with the order; and (4) the respondent's willful disobedience of the order. See, Conn v. Superior Court (Farmer's Group) (1987) 167 Cal.App.3d 774, 784. The required showing has been made here.
Armstrong has not made any counter showing. Thus, under Code Civ Proc. § 1218, the Court "...must determine whether the person proceeded against is guilty of the contempt..." Donovan v. Superior Court, 39 Cal. 2d 848, 855 (1952).
A. The Injunction Is Valid.
The Injunction was issued in October, 1995 by the Honorable Gary W. Thomas, upon Plaintiff's motion for summary adjudication. Judgment incorporating the Order was entered on May 2, 1996. There was no appeal from the Injunction, which is clearly final and no longer subject to direct or collateral attack. The only possible avenue of attack would be a collateral attack based on a claim by Armstrong that it is invalid on its face.
fully litigated his claims that such an order would be vague, ambiguous, overbroad, against public policy, violative of his First Amendment rights, and violative of his rights to equal protection under the Fourteenth Amendment. Considerable time and effort was expended by the parties and this Court in addressing and rejecting Armstrong's numerous arguments as to why the proposed Order was improper.
and determined on a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim, a motion for judgement on the pleadings ...(or)...a motion for summary judgment..."
B. Armstrong Had Actual Knowledge Of The Injunction.
4. Facilitating in any manner the creation, publication, broadcast, writing .... electronic recording or reproduction of any kind of . . .documentary work of any kind which discusses, refers to or mentions Scientology, the Church, and/or any of the Beneficiaries [of the Order].
1 In an internet posting on December 21, Armstrong stated that he had made 2289 postings which violated what he called the "insane injunction." Declaration of Andrew H. Wilson, Exhibit A.
2 There is no impediment to the Court proceeding in Armstrong's absence. It is beyond controversy that Armstrong, a fugitive from California, is absent from this Court. Farace v. Superior Court, 148 Cal. App. 3d 915 (1983) [contempt proceeding may go forward if contemnor voluntarily absent].
2. Attached hereto as Exhibit [A] is a copy of an Internet posting made by Mr. Armstrong on December 21, 2000 in which he states that he has violated the " insane injunction on 2289 occasions.
17. From February 20, 1998 through the present, Armstrong has made a total of 131 postings to the Internet, each of which violates one or more provisions of the Injunction. True and correct copies of a sampling of these postings are attached hereto as Exhibit K. A complete listing of these postings is attached as Exhibit L.
I made at least 2289 postings to the Internet, all of which violate $cientology's insane Injunction, during the period of February 20, 1998 through November 13, 2000 the date Wilson signed his perjurious declaration.
This liar and the crime cultists with whom he's collaborating would have me jailed for the 131 postings and then while in jail have me locked up for life for the rest of my postings. Even if the judge only gives me two days in jail per posting, that's almost 13 years in prison. But the judge can hit me with five days per violation, which would mean 32 years in prison.
Then there are the 120 or so postings I've made from November 13 through the present, which would add about another year. So, if they kept me in solitary and nobody listened to me in prison, I would be out when I'm eighty-seven.
Of course there's the matter of the crime cultists having me disposed of quietly and without sorrow in prison, which is really their insane plan.
$cientology is a criminal enterprise and should be treated like any criminal enterprise, and their lying scumbag lawyers treated like lying scumbag lawyers working for a criminal enterprise.

References: § 1209
 § 1209
 v. 
 v. 
 § 1218
 v. 
 v.