Source: https://www.rcfp.org/open-government-sections/1-appeal-routes/
Timestamp: 2019-04-24 12:10:14+00:00

Document:
Alaska has no intermediate court of appeals for civil cases, and appeals from decisions of the superior court are taken directly to the Alaska Supreme Court. It is possible to petition for review from a trial court decision that does not constitute a final judgment, though the acceptance of review is discretionary with the Supreme Court.
Under the Court’s present rules, the appeal may be heard in the first instance by the Court of Appeals. Unless a case poses a question of state constitutional law or falls into certain categories not relevant here, appellate jurisdiction lies initially in the Court of Appeals. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2. Nonetheless, any appeal is subject to reassignment by the Supreme Court, which will consider such factors as whether the case suggests a need to clarify the law or presents an issue of first impression, a question of statutory interpretation, an issue of substantial public interest, or an issue on which there is a perceived inconsistency among prior decisions. Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2(b).
An order of the trial court under the CPRA is not appealable, but is immediately reviewable by petition to the appellate court for the issuance of an extraordinary writ. Cal. Gov't Code § 6259(c); Filarsky v. Superior Court, 28 Cal. 4th 419, 426-27, 121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 844, 49 P.3d 194 (2002)(purpose of requiring writ review is to minimize delay of disclosure); Powers v. City of Richmond, 10 Cal. 4th 85, 40 Cal. Rptr. 2d 839, 893 P.2d 1130 (1995). See, e.g., MiniCal Consumer Law Group v. Carlsbad Police Dept., 214 Cal. App. 4th 259, 261, 153 Cal. Rptr. 3d 577 (2013) (dismissing appeal from trial court’s order in CPRA action and affirming exclusive means to challenge order is a writ petition filed within 20 days after service of written notice of order’s entry).
Additionally, as the California Supreme Court has held, trial court orders under the CPRA shall be reviewable on their merits. Times Mirror Co. v. Superior Court, 53 Cal. 3d 1325, 1336, 813 P.2d 240, 283 Cal. Rptr. 893 (1991).
Orders either granting or denying attorney fees under Section 6259(d) are reviewable by appeal, however. Los Angeles Times v. Alameda Corridor Transp. Authority, 88 Cal. App. 4th 1381, 1388, 107 Cal. Rptr. 2d 29 (2001).
It is nevertheless critical to win at the trial court level. The trial court should be presented with every piece of evidence and testimony, by declaration under penalty of perjury, that may persuade the court in favor of the petitioner, and which would make a complete record in the event that the trial court order becomes the subject of appellate review.
There are two routes of appealing a district court decision which upholds denial of access to public records.
Appeal to the Court of Appeals pursuant to C.A.R. 4. This is the usual route. The drawbacks include a one-to-two year wait for a decision from the Court of Appeals, although this court has been more willing than the state Supreme Court to give effect to the Open Records Act. See, e.g., Western Services Inc. v. Sargent School Dist. No. RE-33J, 719 P.2d 355 (Colo. App. 1986), rev'd, 751 P.2d 56 (Colo. 1988).
If the applicant seeks to challenge the constitutionality of the statute under which inspection of records has been denied, appeal may be taken directly to the Supreme Court. See Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-4-102(1)(b). When the proceeding raises a challenge to the constitutionality of the statute, a copy of the proceedings must be served on the attorney general under Colo. Rev. Stat. § 13-51-115, and Colo. R. Civ. P. 57(j). In general, a person seeking to challenge the constitutionality of a statute should bring an action for declaratory judgment along with the application for an order to show cause.
Petition for Writ to the Supreme Court pursuant to C.A.R. 21. In extraordinary cases, such as where immediate harm is threatened in the absence of disclosure, or where the issue presented is likely to arise again, the applicant may petition the Supreme Court directly under Appellate Rule 21 for a writ of mandamus directing the district court to order that inspection of public records be allowed. A Rule 21 petition is not a substitute for an appeal to the Court of Appeals.
Appeal of decisions of the Superior Court may be taken to the Connecticut Appellate Court and, by certification from the Appellate Court's decision, to the Connecticut Supreme Court.
An appeal can be made to the Delaware Supreme Court. There are no intermediate appellate courts.
Although the Georgia Constitution provides that the Supreme Court shall have appellate jurisdiction of "[a]ll equity cases," Ga. Const., Art. 6, § 6, ¶ III—as suits to enforce the Act typically are—the Court has held that "[c]ases in which the grant or denial of [equitable] relief was merely ancillary to underlying issues of law, or would have been a matter of routine once the underlying issues of law were resolved, are not 'equity cases,'" and that, even where equitable enforcement of the Act is sought, an appeal may properly be taken to the Court of Appeals if the appeal involves primarily an issue of law, such as the construction and application of the Act. Beachamp v. Knight, 261 Ga. 608, 609, 409 S.E.2d 208 (1991).
Accordingly, appeals in Open Records Act cases are now typically taken by the Georgia Court of Appeals.
In Hawaii, appeals from all final judgments of the circuit courts are made to the Intermediate Court of Appeals. Haw. Rev. Stat. § 641-1(a).
The appeal of a district court decision is governed by the Idaho Appellate Rules, and thus is treated like any ordinary appeal.
Appeal of a denial by a circuit court of access to records is taken according to the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure, 735 ILCS 5/1-101 to 22-105, and the Illinois Supreme Court Rules.
An adverse decision is appealed to the Indiana Court of Appeals, see Indiana Appellate Rule 5, although a party can seek to go directly to the Supreme Court under Rule 56 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure in rare cases.
Appeal is taken by filing a notice with the clerk of court where judgment was entered. Iowa R. App. P. 6.102.
Appeal is to the Kansas Court of Appeals, then upon application for review (discretionary) to the Kansas Supreme Court.
The losing party may file an appeal of right with the Kentucky Court of Appeals.
The appeal route is to the state intermediate appellate court for the circuit where the district court is located, then, upon application for writ of certiorari, to the Louisiana Supreme Court.
The only appeal from Superior Court is directly to the Supreme Judicial Court of Maine.
An appeal of a Circuit Court ruling must first be taken to the Maryland Court of Special Appeals, which must accept the appeal. Further appeal is available then to the Court of Appeals, which has the discretion to accept or reject review. See Md. Rule § 8-301; see also Baltimore Sun Co. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, 359 Md. 653, 755 A.2d 1130 (2000).
In some cases where a court orders a custodian to detail each record withheld or redacted in order to justify the decision the Maryland Court of Appeals has clarified that such orders are nonetheless immediately appealable as an appeal of an order granting injunctive relief. Office of the State Prosecutor v. Judicial Watch Inc., 356 Md. 118, 128, 737 A.2d 592, 597 (1999); see also Blythe v. State, 161 Md. App. 492, 521 (2005).
Usual appeal procedures under Michigan Court Rules are available.
Appeal of a district court decision is to the Montana Supreme Court.
From district court to Nebraska Court of Appeals. See Neb. Rev. Stat. §24-1106 (Reissue 2016).
A district court’s order is appealable to the Nevada Supreme Court. NRAP 3.
A Superior Court ruling on a petition for access is deemed a final judgment, which may be appealed as of right to the New Hampshire Supreme Court.
Appeal from an adverse decision in the Superior Court, Law Division is to the Appellate Division of the Superior Court. Likewise, appeals from decisions of the Government Records Council are appealable to the Appellate Division. Further appeal is to the New Jersey Supreme Court.
Court of Appeals and New Mexico Supreme Court.
A decision of a District or Superior court denying access to a public record is appealable to the North Carolina Court of Appeals.
Any appeal of a decision of the district court would be taken directly to the North Dakota Supreme Court.
Common pleas court judgments may be appealed to the court of appeals for the judicial district in which the common pleas court sits.
Court of appeals judgments may be appealed to the Ohio Supreme Court.
There is no state appellate court level beyond the Ohio Supreme Court.
Court of Claims judgments are appealed to the Court of Appeals for Franklin County.
A final order may be appealed to the Oklahoma Supreme Court. 12 O.S. § 952. The case may then be assigned to the Court of Appeals by the Supreme Court.
In Oregon, an appeal from a circuit court decision in a Public Records case is made exclusively to the Oregon Court of Appeals. If the requester is dissatisfied with the Court of Appeals’ decision, the requester may file a Petition for Review with the Oregon Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has discretion in whether to take petitions.
Attorneys’ Fees. If the requester is successful in either reversing an adverse trial court judgment or in sustaining a trial court judgment requiring disclosure, the requester may also recover reasonable attorneys’ fees on appeal. Again, the requester has no liability for the public body’s fees if the requester is the losing party at the appellate level.
Appeal of a Superior Court decision is made directly to the Rhode Island Supreme Court.
Appeals must be noticed to the South Carolina Court of Appeals.
Circuit Court decisions may be appealed to the South Dakota Supreme Court.
Appellate review is available, as the court's decision on the petition is a final judgment on the merits. T.C.A. § 10-7-505(b).
The losing party may proceed to the intermediate Court of Appeals or the Texas Supreme Court by way of mandamus or, in some instances, by way of appeal. The normal rules for appellate actions found in the Texas Rules of Civil and Appellate Procedure apply.
Depending on the identity of the agency or court that entered the order from which appeal is taken, the appeal will be either to the Utah Court of Appeals or to the Utah Supreme Court. See Utah Code §§ 78A-3-102, 78A-4-103.
Vermont does not have an intermediate appellate court, therefore any appeal of the trial court’s decision, will be to the Vermont Supreme Court.
A suit brought in General District Court may be appealed to Circuit Court for a de novo hearing. Appeals from Circuit Court are to the Virginia Supreme Court.
The only appeal route from an adverse circuit court ruling in a FOIA suit is to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.
A party appealing a decision from the district court may appeal to the Wyoming Supreme Court. A party who chooses to appeal a court decision should follow the Wyoming Rules of Appellate Procedure.

References: § 6259
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 § 13
 § 13
 Art. 6
 § 6
 v. 
 § 641
 § 8
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 §24
 § 952
 § 10