Source: https://withoutmyconsent.org/50state/state-guides/nevada/statutory-civil-law
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 07:57:28+00:00

Document:
Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.690, allows a plaintiff to bring a civil action against a person who unlawfully eavesdropped on his/her private conversation as provided in Nev. Rev. Stat. §§ 200.620 and 200.650. While Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.620 is specific to private conversations conducted over telephone or other forms of wire communication and requires consent of both parties to a conversation, § 200.650 applies to private conversations performed in-person and only requires the consent of one party to the conversation.1 It is not clear from the statute or case law whether the recording of sexual activity without accompanying conversation would be actionable under this statute, nor is it apparent to what extent phone calls made via cellular phone, Skype or other internet-based means are covered. It is also unclear whether text messaging is covered by the statute.
A victim may be able to bring a civil suit against a person who published his/her private, intimate images for violation of Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.650 if, for example, the images were recorded on video and included a conversation between the victim and another person. In order to be able to pursue this cause of action under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 200.650, however, the person who recorded the victim must not have been a party to the victim’s conversation.
“1. Except as otherwise provided in NRS 179.410 to 179.515, inclusive, and 704.195, a person shall not disclose the existence, content, substance, purport, effect or meaning of any wire or radio communication to any person unless authorized to do so by either the sender or receiver.
A plaintiff suing under this statute may recover attorney’s fees.
A defendant in an eavesdropping civil suit may also be criminally liable.
This statute allows a victim to bring a civil suit against a person who nonconsensually distributed the victim’s private, intimate image(s) by email in the victim’s name. For example, this situation may arise if the person distributing the image(s) opens an email account in the victim’s name and subsequently distributes the images in question posing as the victim.
This statute allows the victim to recover attorney’s fees. A defendant in this situation may also be criminally prosecuted for falsifying electronic mail.
If the person who posted a victim’s private, intimate images without the victim’s consent is deriving a commercial use from the material, the victim may sue that person under Nevada’s right to publicity statute.
This statute allows the victim of the nonconsensual publication of his/her private, intimate images to bring a civil suit against the person who published the images, if that person committed a crime included in the statute and was also motivated by characteristics of the victim enumerated in the statute. For example, this statute would be applicable where a person posted a victim’s private images online as part of a harassment campaign against the victim and included derogatory remarks about the victim’s race or perceived sexual orientation.
This statute allows the victim to recover attorney’s fees.
A defendant sued under Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.690 may also be prosecuted for the crime they committed against the plaintiff when violating Nev. Rev. Stat. § 41.690.

References: § 200
 § 200
 § 200
 § 200
 § 200
 § 41
 § 41