Source: http://addylaw.com/court-appointed-services
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 22:24:38+00:00

Document:
For more than 20 years, I have assisted district courts in handling aspects of patent litigation.
With a broad background in patent litigation, I have been asked on multiple occasions to assist district courts in handling aspects of complex patent cases about technologies ranging from encryption to guided vehicles to medical devices.
My experience includes advising courts on all aspects of the discovery process; claim construction briefing, argument, and decision; summary judgment proceedings; pre-trial proceedings, and trial. I have been appointed as a Special Master under F.R.C.P. §706, and as a Court-Appointed Expert under F.R.C.P. §53. Duties have included preparing reports and recommendations on infringement and validity, attending hearings, and preparing draft Markman rulings and summary judgment decisions.
Urologix, Inc. v. Prostalund AB,). Appointed assistant to the district court to prepare recommendations with respect to patent claim construction and summary judgment in patent litigation concerning a medical device. 227 F. Supp. 2d 1033 (E.D. Wis. 2002). Reconsideration of the patent was denied, 256 F. Supp. 2d 911 (E.D. Wis. 2003).
Omega Mfg. Corp. v. Valley Tissue Pkg. Court-appointed special master in connection with patent claim construction hearing. Prepared claim construction decision and recommendations adopted by the district court on discovery motions in patent litigation relating to packaging of paper products. (E.D. Wis. 2002). Case was dismissed.
Microelectronic Modules v. Maxim Integrated Prods. Court-appointed expert in connection with the preparation of patent claim construction recommendations and summary judgment recommendations to the district court in patent litigation concerning electrical circuitry. (E.D. Wis., filed 2001).
Allen-Bradley Co. v. DataLink Techs. Court-appointed assistant to the district court in connection with preparation of recommendations regarding patent claim construction and summary judgment in complex patent litigation involving patents relating to programmable controllers for integrating multiple computer systems. (E.D. Wis. filed 1997).
HK Systems, Inc. v. Mannesmann Dematic Rapistan Corp. Court-appointed expert assistant on claim construction issues and summary judgment motions on patents for automatic guided vehicles. Prepared recommendations on claim construction and multiple summary judgment motions. (E.D. Wis. filed 2000).

References: §706
 §53
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.