Source: http://mt.findacase.com/research/wfrmDocViewer.aspx/xq/fac.20180706_0001819.DMT.htm/qx
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 14:03:58+00:00

Document:
JUDGE JAMES C. REYNOLDS, MONTANA ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF MONTANA, MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, and PUBLIC DEFENDER NICOLE KLEIN, Defendants.
Plaintiff Wayne Hussar, a state prisoner proceeding without counsel, filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) and a proposed Complaint alleging Defendants illegally convicted and sentenced him. (Doc. 2.) Mr. Hussar is subject to the three strikes provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and therefore the Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis should be denied.
Mr. Hussar has exceeded the three “strikes” allowed by the Prison Litigation Reform Act to a prisoner attempting to proceed in forma pauperis in a federal civil lawsuit. As such, he cannot proceed in forma pauperis in the instant case unless he can show that he qualifies for the “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).
To meet the exception, Mr. Hussar must allege facts that demonstrate that he was “under imminent danger of serious physical injury” at the time of the filing of the complaint. Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1053 (“it is the circumstances at the time of the filing of the complaint that matters for the purposes of the ‘imminent danger' exception under § 1915(g)”). Mr. Hussar is complaining of an illegal conviction and sentencing. His claims are barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and do not satisfy the imminent danger exception to section 1915(g). Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1055-56 (9th Cir. 2007). The motion to proceed in forma pauperis should be denied.
While ordinarily litigants are given a period of time to pay the full filing fee of $400.00, Mr. Hussar should not be allowed to do so in this case. Mr. Hussar has been made aware that he is subject to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and cannot submit such filings without payment of the filing fee or demonstrating imminent danger of serious physical harm. See Hussar v. Lewis and Clark County Detention Center, Civil Action No. 17cv55-H-DLC-JTJ; Hussar v. Almandinger, et al., Civil Action No. 18cv51-H-DMM-JTJ.
In addition, Mr. Hussar is not entitled to a fourteen-day period to object. See Minetti v. Port of Seattle, 152 F.3d 1113, 1114 (9th Cir. 1998) (per curiam).
No motion for reconsideration will be entertained.
1. Sandra Hussar should be terminated as a plaintiff in this action.

References: § 1915
 § 1915
 § 1915
 v. 
 v. 
 § 1915
 v. 
 v. 
 v.