Source: https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjournal/239/034.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 00:43:07+00:00

Document:
1. Lord Smith of FinsburyThe Right Honourable Christopher Robert Smith, having been created Baron Smith of Finsbury, of Finsbury in the London Borough of Islington, for life by Letters Patent dated in the afternoon of 22nd June 2005, was introduced between the Baroness Smith of Gilmorehill and the Lord Puttnam, the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod and Garter King of Arms preceding; and took and subscribed the oath pursuant to statute (see Appendix 1).
2. Baroness Adams of CraigieleaKatherine Patricia Irene Adams, having been created Baroness Adams of Craigielea, of Craigielea in Renfrewshire, for life by Letters Patent dated in the afternoon of 28th June 2005, was introduced between the Lord Hogg of Cumbernauld and the Baroness Golding, the Gentleman Usher of the Black Rod and Garter King of Arms preceding; and took and subscribed the oath pursuant to statute (see Appendix 2).
3. OathMichael Patrick Lord Nolan took and subscribed the oath pursuant to statute.
4. Lord Carlisle of BucklowThe Lord Chancellor acquainted the House that Lord Carlisle of Bucklow, a member of the House, had died on 14th July 2005.
5. Weston (Petitioner) v. Garnett (Her Majestys Inspector of Taxes) (Respondent)The petition of Michael Weston praying for leave to appeal was presented and referred to an Appeal Committee.
6. Lonsdale (Petitioner) v. Braisby (Her Majestys Inspector of Taxes) (Respondent)The petition of Marion Lonsdale praying for leave to appeal was presented and referred to an Appeal Committee.
7. Botham (Appellant) v. Ministry of Defence (Respondents)The appeal was set down for hearing and referred to an Appellate Committee.
8. Leeds City Council (Respondents) v. Price and others and others (FC) (Appellants)The petition of the appellants praying that the time for lodging the statement and appendix and setting down the cause for hearing might be extended to 29th August or to the third sitting day after the next ensuing meeting of the House (the agents for the respondents consenting thereto) was presented; and it was ordered as prayed.
9. Beggs (Respondent) v. Scottish Ministers (Appellants) (Scotland)The petition of the appellants praying that the time for lodging the statement and appendix and setting down the cause for hearing might be extended to 1st September or to the third sitting day after the next ensuing meeting of the House (the agents for the respondent consenting thereto) was presented; and it was ordered as prayed.
The petition of the appellants praying that the appeals be conjoined; that the appellants be allowed to lodge one appendix in respect of the three appeals; that the appellant Clift be allowed to lodge one statement and one case; that the appellants Hindawi and Headley be allowed to lodge one statement and one case in respect of their appeals; that the respondent be allowed to lodge two separate cases in the appeals of Clift and of Hindawi and Headley respectively and that the appellants and respondent be jointly represented by leading counsel in respect of all three appeals but separately represented by junior counsel in the appeal of Clift (the agents for the respondent consenting thereto) was presented; and it was ordered as prayed.
Freakley and others (Petitioners) v. Centre Reinsurance International Company and others (Respondents) and one other actionThat leave to appeal be given; and that the petition of appeal be lodged by 1st August.
AMEC Civil Engineering Limited (Petitioners) v. Secretary of State for Transport (Respondent)That leave to appeal be refused; that the respondent be at liberty to apply for his costs in accordance with direction 5.1(d); and, if the application is granted, that the amount thereof be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties.
Teleos plc (Petitioners) v. Her Majestys Commissioners of Customs and Excise (Respondents) That leave to appeal be refused; that the respondents be at liberty to apply for their costs in accordance with direction 5.1(d); and, if the application is granted, that the amount thereof be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties.
Sherrington and others (Petitioners) v. Sherrington (Respondent)That leave to appeal be refused; that the respondent be at liberty to apply for her costs in accordance with direction 5.1(d); and, if the application is granted, that the amount thereof be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties.
Sritharan (Petitioner) v. Law Society (Respondents)That leave to appeal be refused; that the respondents be at liberty to apply for their costs in accordance with direction 5.1(d); and, if the application is granted, that the amount thereof be certified by the Clerk of the Parliaments if not agreed between the parties.
Postgraduate Medical Education and Training Board (Fees) Rules Order 2005, laid under the General and Specialist Medical Practice (Education, Training and Qualifications) Order 2003.
Merchant Shipping (Medical Examination) (Amendment) Regulations 2005, laid under the Merchant Shipping Act 1995.
15. Report and Accounts for 200405 of the Countryside Agency, together with the Report of the Comptroller and Auditor General, laid under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
20. The late Rt Hon. Sir Edward Heath KG MBEIt was moved by the Lord President (Baroness Amos) that, as a mark of respect to the memory of the late Sir Edward Heath, this House do now adjourn; after debate, the motion was agreed to.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.