Source: http://www.judgewatch.org/web-pages/judicial-compensation/legislative-oversight-judicial-raises.htm
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 22:21:26+00:00

Document:
CJA's March 28, 2013 e-mail to Assemblyman Philip Palmesano -- "There's plenty of $ for the developmentally disabled -- available from the Judiciary appropriations bill (A.3001)"
CJA's March 28, 2013 e-mail to Assembly Members Buchwald & Katz -- "Subject: Annotations for SUCCESSFUL, due process-procedural objections on Assembly floor"
CJA's March 27, 2013 e-mail to Assembly Ways & Means Chairman Farrell, Ranking Member Oaks, Assembly Members Buchwald & Katz, & Other Legislators -- "Subject: Assisting Assembly Members in their Duty to Reject Judicial Appropriations Bill A.3001"
CJA's March 26, 2013 e-mail to Senate Finance Committee Chairman DeFrancisco & Ranking Member Krueger -- with copy to Senators Latimer, Hoylman, & Assemblyman Buchwald -- "RE: Request that CJA's Opposition Report & verified complaint be brought to the Senate floor for inspection by the Senators"
CJA's March 26, 2013 e-mail to ALL Senators -- "Subject: 'grand larceny of the public fisc' -- Why You Must Reject S2601 -- Judiciary Appropriations Bill"
CJA's March 26, 2013 letter to ALL Assembly Members -- "RE: Why You Must Reject A.3001 -- The Appropriations Bill for the Judiciary"
CJA's March 26, 2013 letter to Secretary of Senate & Assembly Public Information Office -- "RE: The Public’s Right to Know the 'Process' Behind Adoption of Senate Resolution 818 and Assembly Resolution 812: The Scandal of Judiciary Appropriations Bill S.2601/A.3001, the Unidentified, Unitemized Judicial Salary Increases Therein, District Attorney Salary Reimbursement Based Thereon – & the Price Tag of Each"
CJA's March 25, 2013 e-mails to Senator Krueger, Senator Latimer, Senator Parker, & Senator Hoylman -- "Subject: Standing up for Legislative Law 54 & 'process' with respect to the budget"
E-MAIL TRANSMITTALS: to all Senators -- here & here & here -- and then again on March 26, 2013 "'grand larceny of the public fisc'..."
CJA's March 22, 2013 letter to the General Budget Conference Committee & its Subcommittee on "Public Protection", Criminal Justice, & Judiciary -- "RE: The Public’s Right to Know the 'Process' Behind Adoption of Senate Resolution 818 and Assembly Resolution 812: The Scandal of Judiciary Appropriations Bill S.2601/A.3001, the Unidentified, Unitemized Judicial Salary Increases Therein, District Attorney Salary Reimbursement Based Thereon – & the Price Tag of Each"
CJA's March 19, 2013 letter to Governor Andrew Cuomo -- "RE: Assisting the Legislature in Discharging its Constitutional Duty: The People’s Right to Know the Dollar Cost of the Judiciary Budget & of the Appropriations Bill for the Judiciary & to be Protected from 'Grand Larceny of the Public Fisc' by Unidentified, Unitemized Judicial Pay Raises, whose Fraudulence, Statutory-Violations, and Unconstitutionality are Proven by Documentary Evidence in Your Possession & the Legislature’s"
CJA's March 15, 2013 e-mail ALERT to ALL Senate & Assembly Members -- "Subject: Is the Judiciary Budget a 'Slush Fund'?"
CJA's March 13, 2013 e-mail to the General Budget Conference Committee & its Subcommittee on "Public Protection", Criminal Justice & Judiciary -- "Subject: The Legislature's Duty to Reject Judicial Appropriations Bill S2601-A3001 & its Unidentified Judicial Salary Increases that are Fraudulent, Statutorily-Violative, & Unconstitutional"
CJA's March 13, 2013 e-mails to Legislative Leadership -- "Subject: The Uselessness of the Legislature's 'White', 'Blue', 'Yellow' & 'Green' Books as Aids to Legislators in Understanding the Judiciary Budget & District Attorney Salary Reimbursement"
Exhibit A: Senate Majority's "White Book" link to "White Book"
Exhibit B: Senate Minority's "Blue Book" link to "Blue Book"
Exhibit C: Assembly Majority's "Yellow Book" link to "Yellow Book"
CJA's March 5, 2013 e-mail to Senate Finance Commitee Majority -- "Subject: Senate Finance Committee Majority: Verifying the Dispositive Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judiciary Budget & Judicial Pay Raises"
CJA's March 5, 2013 e-mail to Senate Finance Commitee Minority -- "Subject: Senate Finance Committee Minority: Verifying the Dispositive Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judiciary Budget & Judicial Pay Raises"
CJA's March 5, 2013 e-mail to Senate Finance Committee Minority -- "Subject: Senate Finance Committee Minority Procedures for Enabling Senate Members to Discharge their 'Policy Making Role'"
CJA's March 4, 2013 e-mail to Assembly Ways & Means Democratic Majority -- "Subject: Assembly Ways & Means Democratic Majority: Verifying the Dispositve Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judicial Budget & Judicial pay Raises"
CJA's March 4, 2013 e-mail to Assembly Ways & Means Republican Minority -- "Subject: Assembly Ways & Means Republican Minority: Verifying the Dispositve Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judiciary Budget & Judicial pay Raises"
CJA's March 4, 2013 e-mail to Assembly Judiciary Committee Chair Weinstein & Ranking Member McKevitt -- "Subject: Assembly Judiciary Committee: Verifying the Dispositive Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judiciary Budget & Judicial Pay Raises"
CJA's February 27, 2013 letter to Senator Liz Krueger's Chief of Staff -- "RE: Memorializing What You Told Me"
CJA's February 27, 2013 e-mail to Senator Liz Krueger -- "Subject: Securing Appropriate Oversight & Action"
CJA's February 27, 2013 e-mail to Senate Finance Committee Majority Coalition Chief of Staff & Secretary Robert Mujica, Counsel to Republican Conference Diane Burman, & Counsel David Gruenberg -- "Subject: Verifying the Dispositive Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judiciary Budget & Judicial Pay Raises"
CJA's February 27, 2013 e-mail for Senate Finance Committee Democratic Minority Secretary Joseph Pennisi & Democratic Conference Counsel Laura Wood -- "Subject: Verifying the Dispositive Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judiciary Budget & Judicial Pay Raises"
CJA's February 27, 2013 e-mail for Assembly Ways & Means Committee Democratic Majority Secretary Matt Howard & Counsel Michael Johnson -- "Subject: Verifying the Dispositive Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judiciary Budget & Judicial Pay Raises"
CJA's February 27, 2013 e-mail for Assembly Ways & Means Committee Republican Minority Director Rebecca Dagati & Counsel John Mertz -- "Subject: Verifying the Dispositive Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judiciary Budget & Judicial Pay Raises"
CJA's February 27, 2013 e-mail to Senate Judiciary Committee Chair John Bonacic & Ranking Member John Sampson -- "Subject: Verifying the Dispositive Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judiciary Budget & Judicial Pay Raises"
CJA's February 27, 2013 e-mail to Assembly Judiciary Committee Chair Helene Weinstein & Ranking Member Tom McKevitt -- "Subject: Verifying the Dispositive Nature of the February 6, 2013 Opposition Testimony to the Judiciary Budget & Judicial Pay Raises"
CJA's February 26, 2013 letter to Budget Director Robert Megna -- "RE: Furnishing the Legislature with Essential Information: (1) What review did the Division of the Budget do of the Judiciary’s budget for fiscal year 2013-2014?; (2) What is the Division of the Budget’s response to CJA’s testimony at the Legislature’s February 6, 2013 budget hearing on 'public protection', opposing the Judiciary’s budget and funding for the judicial salary increase?"
"RE: Request for records pertaining to the Judiciary's budgets for fiscal years 2013-2014 & 2012-2013 pursuant to FOIL and 124 of the Chief Administrator's Rules"
Unified Court System's February 20, 2013 e-mail -- "Subject: foil request"
CJA's February 22, 2013 e-mail to Unified Court System -- "Subject: Furnishing Responsive Documents -- RE: foil request"
Unified Court System's February 22, 2013 e-mail -- "Furnishing Responsive Documents -- RE: foil request"
"RE: The Legislature's Certified Itemized Estimates of its Financial Needs for Fiscal Year 2013-2014, as Required by Article VII, Sec. 1 of the NYS Constitution"
Secretary of the Senate's March 4, 2013 e-mail -- "Subject: Re: Legislature's Certified Itemized Estimates of its Financial Needs: NYS Constitution VII, Sec. 1"
Assembly Public Information Office's March 4, 2013 e-mail -- "Subject: FOIL request re. itemized estimates"
"RE: Where are the Legislature's Separately Presented 'Fringe Benefit Costs' for Fiscal Year 2013-2014?"
"RE: 'Budget Consideration Schedule' and 'Joint Budget Conference Committee" and Subcommittees Thereto, Pursuant to Senate and Assembly Joint Rules"
March 13, 2013 News Relese of Assembly Speaker Sheldon Silver: "Assembly Passes Sunshine Week Legislation to Increase Public Access and Promote Greater Government Accountability"
Rule VII, §4c. -- "Committee oversight function. Each standing committee is required to conduct oversight of the administration of laws and programs by agencies within its jurisdiction."
CJA's December 3, 2012 letter to Secretary of the Senate -- "RE: (1) Senate Violation of its Rule VII, 4(d) & Rule XIV, §1(a): Annual Reports of the Senate's 33 Standing Committees; (2) FOIL Request: Senate Judiciary Committee's Annual Reports"
CJA's December 11, 2012 letter to Secretary of the Senate -- "RE: CJA's December 3, 2012 letter: (1) Senate Violation of its Rule VII, §4(d) & Rule XIV, §1(a): Annual Reports of the Senate's 33 Standing Committees; (2) FOIL Request: Senate Judiciary Committee's Annual Reports"
CJA's February 28, 2013 letter to Secretary of the Senate ---- "RE: Did You Respond to CJA's December 11, 2012 Letter?: (1) Senate Violation of its Rule VIII, §4(d) & Rule XV, §1(a): Annual Reports of the Senate's 33 Standing Committees; (2) FOIL Request: Senate Finance Committee Annual Reports; 2012-2009; Judiciary Committee Annual Report: 2010"
2012 Senate Judiciary Committee Annual Report -- contains one sentence about the "Judiciary Budget for State Fiscal Year 2012-2013" --"The Legislature adopted a Unified Court System Budget of $2.55 billion, which reflected an increase of $3.6 million or .14%."
Rule IV, §1d: "..Each standing committee shall, furthermore, devote substantial efforts to the oversight and analysis of the activities, including but not limited to the implementation and administration of programs, of departments, agencies, divisions, authorities, boards, commissions, public benefit corporations and other entities within its jurisdiction..."
CJA's February 28, 2013 e-mail to Assembly Public Information Office -- "Where are the Annual Reports of the Assembly Ways & Means Committee?"
"CJA Testifying tomorrow in Opposition to the Judiciary Budget"
"Reporting on CJA's challenge to the judicial pay raises -- and the Judiciary's budget"
"Citizen Challenge to Judiciary Budget Exposes the Sham of NY's budget Process & the Hoax of its New Transparency"
"The Legislature's Duty to Reject Judiciary Appropriations Bill S2601-A3001 & its Unidentified Judicial Salary Increases that are Fraudulent, Statutorily-Violative, & Unconstitutional"
"Your Coverage of Today's Senate Floor Proceedings on the Budget"

References: §4
 §1
 §4
 §1
 §4
 §1
 §1