Source: http://www.childrenslegalrightsjournal.com/childrenslegalrightsjournal/volume_38_issue_2?pg=32
Timestamp: 2019-04-26 04:00:15+00:00

Document:
91 See COLO. REV. STAT. § 22-33-105(2)(c) (2013).
92 See 105 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/10-22.6(b) (1988); ARK. CODE ANN. § 6-18-507(d)(1) (2013) (providing for local board’s review of superintendent’s recommendation for long-term discipline).
93 See 105 ILL. COMP. STAT. 5/10-22.6(b) (1988).
94 ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 15-843(I)–(J) (2013).
95 ARK. CODE ANN. § 6-18-507(d)(2)(A) (2013); CAL. EDUC. CODE § 35146 (2016).
96 See Brewer v. Austin Indep. Sch. Dist., 779 F.2d 260, 263–64 (5th Cir. 1985) (no due process violation where principal, superintendent, and school board attorney were present at closed-session, post-hearing deliberations).
97 CAL. EDUC. CODE § 35146 (2016).
99 See ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 15-843(F)(2)(a)–(b) (2013); CAL. EDUC. CODE § 48918(d) (2016); CONN. GEN. STAT. § 10-233d(b) (2015).
101 OHIO REV. CODE ANN. § 3301.121(D)(2) (2016).
102 CONN. GEN. STAT. § 10-233d(b) (2015).
103 CAL. EDUC. CODE § 48919.5(a) (2016) (requiring that “an impartial administrative panel” be composed of “three or more certificated persons”); See also John A. v. San Bernardino City Unified Sch. Dist., 654 P.2d 242, 244 (Cal. 1982).
104 ARIZ. REV. STAT. ANN. § 15-843(F)(2)(b) (2017).

References: § 22
 § 6
 § 15
 § 6
 § 35146
 v. 
 § 35146
 § 15
 § 48918
 § 10
 § 3301
 § 10
 § 48919
 v. 
 § 15