Source: https://www.retailpatentlitigation.com/2017/06/march-2017-retail-patent-litigation-report/
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 20:53:31+00:00

Document:
March filings were slow, presumably as NPEs waited for the TC Heartland decision from SCOTUS. Frequent filers included Checkerboard Intellectual Property, Electronic Communication Technologies, Hawk Technology, Landmark Technology, Location Services IP, Soverain, Symbology and Venadium.
M2M Solutions LLC v. Amazon.com, Inc., (D. Del.).
Patents: 8,504,007 (System and method for remote asset management); 8,577,358 (System and method for remote asset management); and 8,577,359 (System and method for remote asset management).
Scanning Technologies Innovations, LLC v. Retail Pro International, LLC, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 9,053,498 (Systems and methods for indicating the existence of accessible information pertaining to articles of commerce).
Checkerboard Intellectual Property, LLC v. CaféPress Inc., (D. Del.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 6,529,214 (Interactive print job display system and method).
Electronic Communication Technologies, LLC v. Batteries Online, Inc., (S.D. Fla.; N.D. Ind.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 9,373,261 (Secure notification messaging with user option to communicate with delivery or pickup representative); 7,319,414 (Secure notification messaging systems and methods using authentication indicia); 7,876,239 (Secure notification messaging systems and methods using authentication indicia); and 9,373,261 (Secure notification messaging with user option to communicate with delivery or pickup representative).
Hawk Technology Systems, LLC v. BNSF Railway Company, (E.D. Tex.; D. Conn.; D. Ariz.) (multiple cases).
Patent: RE 43,462 (Video monitoring and conferencing system).
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Big Fish Games, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 6,110,228 (Method and apparatus for software maintenance at remote nodes); and 6,564,229 (System and method for pausing and resuming move/copy operations).
Freeny et al v. Brother International Corporation, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 6,490,443 (Communication and proximity authorization systems); 6,806,977 (Multiple integrated machine system); 7,110,744 (Communication and proximity authorization systems; and 7,301,664 (Multiple integrated machine system).
Venadium LLC v. Ally Financial, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Build A Sign, LLC v. Landmark Technology, LLC, (W.D. Tex.).
Patent: 6,289,319 (Automatic business and financial transaction processing system).
Patents: 8,275,863 (Method of modifying a toolbar); and 9,021,070 (Dynamically modifying a toolbar).
Soverain IP, LLC v. Microsoft Corporation, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 5,708,780 (Internet server access control and monitoring systems); 6,212,634 (Certifying authorization in computer networks); 6,279,112 (Controlled transfer of information in computer networks); 7,191,447 (Managing transfers of information in a communications network); 8,606,900 (Method and system for counting web access requests); and 8,935,706 (Managing transfers of information in a communications network).
Spider Search Analytics LLC v. Restocks, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patent: 7,454,430 (System and method for facts extraction and domain knowledge repository creation from unstructured and semi-structured documents).
Location Services IP, LLC v. BPS Direct, LLC d/b/a Bass Pro Shops d/b/a Bass Pro, Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
BPS Direct, LLC d/b/a Bass Pro Shops d/b/a Bass Pro, Inc.
U-Haul International, Inc. d/b/a Web Team Associates, Inc.
Patents: 6,202,023 (Internet based geographic location referencing system and method); 6,356,834 (Geographic location referencing system and method); and 8,935,220 (Unified geographic database and method of creating, maintaining and using the same).
Kaldren LLC v. Citigroup Inc., (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
D. Power and Associates, Inc.
Patents: 6,098,882 (Variable formatting of digital data into a pattern); 6,176,427 (Variable formatting of digital data into a pattern); 6,820,807 (Variable formatting of digital data into a pattern); and 8,281,999 (Variable formatting of digital data into a pattern).
Blue Spike, LLC v. Barnes & Noble, Inc. et al, (E.D. Tex.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 7,159,116 (Systems, methods and devices for trusted transactions); 7,475,246 (Secure personal content server); 7,779,261 (Method and system for digital watermarking); 7,813,506 (System and methods for permitting open access to data objects and for securing data within the data objects); 7,953,981 (Optimization methods for the insertion, protection, and detection of digital watermarks in digital data); 8,121,343 (Optimization methods for the insertion, protection, and detection of digital watermarks in digitized data); 8,161,286 (Method and system for digital watermarking); 8,171,561 (Secure personal content server); 8,307,213 (Method and system for digital watermarking); 8,739,295 (Secure personal content server); and 8,798,268 (System and methods for permitting open access to data objects and for securing data within the data objects).
Diem LLC v. BigCommerce, Inc., (E.D. Tex.).
Patent: 7,770,122 (Codeless dynamic websites including general facilities).
Symbology Innovations, LLC v. Atlantic City Electric Company, (D.N.J.) (multiple cases).
Patents: 7,992,773 (System and method for presenting information about an object on a portable electronic device); 8,424,752 (System and method for presenting information about an object on a portable electronic device); 8,651,369 (System and method for presenting information about an object on a portable device); and 8,936,190 (System and method for presenting information about an object on a portable electronic device).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.