Source: http://www.bankrupt.com/CAR_Public/101129.mbx
Timestamp: 2019-04-19 21:10:17+00:00

Document:
NATIONAL WESTERN: Makes $21.9-Mil. Settlement Payment in 3rd Qtr.
putative class action lawsuit entitled Richard Fresco, et al. v.
Richard Fresco v. Auto Data Direct, Inc., et al., (U.S. Dist.
federal court in May 2003.
Protection Act. To date, a class has not been certified.
statutory damages, and attorneys' fees.
settlement on July 27, 2010.
a remaining accrual of $2.5 million.
are seeking review by the U.S. Supreme Court.
class litigation asserted against it in Delaware.
compensatory damages, costs and attorneys' fees.
and Merger Sub in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware.
into a Voting Agreement to support the transaction.
the alleged breaches of duties.
damages, and fees and costs, among other relief.
Rouge Steamship Pilots Association, Case No.
09-cv-04494 B, filed on July 24, 2009.
damage to the towboat. The Tintomara incurred minor damage.
claims of negligence, trespass and nuisance.
set in August of 2011. Discovery is set to begin soon.
a claim under OPA 90 that must be followed prior to litigation.
funds on deposit in an interpleader action.
have been caused by the incident.
for "rental cost" of its marina for cleanup operations.
according to a federal class action.
David V. Hiden, Jr., Esq.
Class Action Complaint filed on June 15, 2007.
promulgated under the 1934 Act.
Court for the Western District of Texas.
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA).
the judge in November 2007.
trial court. That motion is pending.
In the first filed case, Hepting et al v. AT&T Corp., AT&T Inc.
to which Plaintiffs were a party.
entity did not provide the alleged assistance.
pending against the AT&T Inc. telecommunications companies.
final judgments in July 2009.
application on grounds that it is unconstitutional was filed.
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, and this appeal remains pending.
cards, as well as collecting certain other state and local fees.
internet access through a smartphone or a wireless data card.
the fast track to trial, the plaintiffs' firm says.
San Francisco and Atlanta seeking combined damages of $1 billion.
The firm also is behind a third pending suit in Connecticut.
paying them overtime despite 50-, 60- or even 70-hour weeks.
eligible to join the suit.
the firm's New York office, said in a prepared statement.
Commission for the quarter ended Sept. 30, 2010.
statements regarding the Company's business and financial results.
class action claims in Superior Court.
the value of the investments.
and intends to defend them vigorously.
A copy of the Complaint in Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company v.
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended October 2, 2010.
Superior Court, Georgia, filed July 27, 2010; Jerszynski v.
rescissory damages; and attorneys' fees and expenses.
believes that these complaints are now moot.
consolidated under the caption and index number Sartoretti v.
Bowne & Co., Inc., et al., Index No. 600531/2010.
September 30, 2010, related to the estimated settlement costs.
defendants, alleged violations of Section 1 of the Sherman Act.
defendants' motion to dismiss the case on several grounds.
seeking leave to amend its original complaint.
action through the High Court.
conspiracies will get access to justice.
summed up succinctly: "They got stuffed."
cartel which the airline participated in.
representative action in the High Court.
the number of potential claimants to an almost limitless number.
shared the same interest "at the relevant time".
judgment and in the period between those two points of time.
consequently, so is the firm.
statements since April 5, 2010.
determine that such agreement was the best available transaction.
allow the plaintiffs to file an appeal.
termination by Terra of the Yara merger agreement.
the virtually identical action in Maryland.
with the plaintiffs to settle this action.
v. Charles Schwab Investment Management, Inc., et al, Case No.
when the Fund's NAV later declined beginning in late 2007.
Act. The case in In Re Charles Schwab Corp. Sec. Litig., No.
17200." Hence, Mr. Peate filed his Section 17200 action.
as a Massachusetts business trust registered under the ICA.
asset management and administration of the YieldPlus Fund.
Charles Schwab & Co. is the parent company of Schwab Investments.
Robert J. Dyer III, Esq.
scheduled for January 25, 2010.
James and Carla Brown v. Bio-Lab, Inc., et al., Don Chapman et al.
captioned Bill Martin, et al. v. Bio-Lab, Inc., et al.
settlements, as well as medical monitoring and injunctive relief.
County, and involves claims by approximately 2,000 plaintiffs.
which proposed settlement will resolve all of the pending actions.
Settlement Class has the right to opt out of the Settlement Class.
is fair, adequate and reasonable.
a settlement of a federal securities class action.
certain former directors of the Company's predecessor Witco Corp.
stock between October 1998 and October 2002.
Exchange Act of 1934, and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder.
by or on behalf of defendants of $21 million.
intend to vigorously defend against them.
recall of about 200 Cub Cadet Volunteer utility vehicles.
control. This poses a crash hazard for consumers.
September 2010 for between $6,800 and $9,800.
contact their local Cub Cadet dealer to schedule a free repair.
quarter ended October 2, 2010.
cases, the manufacturers of the anesthetics used in these pumps.
periods have resulted in cartilage damage to the plaintiffs.
the Company's tenders of indemnity.
settlements of those lawsuits in which both parties are named.
Company and its insurance broker to disclose material information.
intensity of storms such as Hurricane Katrina.
decision or to hold in abeyance its action dismissing the appeal.
Defendants are currently preparing their response.
Energy Retirement Cash Balance Plan.
Energy that they are withdrawing their ADEA claim.
being in excess of $150 million.
and approval of the settlement by the Court.
Court issued an order staying all pending motions in the case.
On October 4, 2010, a class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S.
approval of the settlement of the State Action by the State Court.
Federal Action and all claims asserted therein with prejudice.
by Trubion if such fees and costs are approved by the State Court.
Exchange Commission for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
its follow-on offering of November 2007.
prospectus contained inaccurate statements of material fact.
Media Holding Limited Litigation and named Iron Workers Local No.
25 Pension Fund as lead plaintiff in the consolidated action.
advertising business division due to acquisitions it made.
motion to dismiss. A reply brief was filed on Dec. 5, 2008.
a judgment dismissing the case.
appealing the judgment granting the motion to dismiss.
company's November 5, 2010, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
data, but the company keeps selling them.
William J. Doyle II, Esq.
circuit and cause fires, a class action claims in Federal Court.
release saying the complaint was "without merit."
payment of any funds by the company.
to return or stop using the medicines.
problems that have bedeviled J&J, the report notes.
compliance under the watchful eye of regulators.
medicines, some contact lenses and certain hip-replacement parts.
manufacturer were offered money and repairs last week.
attorneys' fees and other expenses.
a sticking point in the past.
first class-action suit in the country over Chinese drywall.
to pay $4 million. Keys Gate Realty settle for $2.6 million.
Banner's portion at about $2 million.
each homeowner $8.50 per square foot of their home for expenses.
drywall." Attorneys for Banner could not be reached for comment.
Product Safety Commission, most of them from Florida.
alleging privacy violations remain stayed.
Knology filed its motion to dismiss on March 26, 2010.
Knology's motion to dismiss was moot.
Ladish share), in Milwaukee County Court.
A. Rick Atwood, Jr. Esq.
disclosed in its November 5, 2010, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
has been certified against the Company occurred in Koyle, et. al.
only for the state of Idaho.
have installed its networks along the rights-of-way so granted.
maintain its networks did not have the legal authority to do so.
operations, but could affect future cash flows.
securities class action filed against it since 2009.
defendants in purported class action lawsuits filed in the U.S.
that those investments were imprudent.
these actions and intends to defend these actions vigorously.
transferred to Arizona and consolidated into a single action.
revenue related to certain customers.
in January and February 2009.
finalize the settlement, which will require court approval.
prospects in violation of federal securities laws.
and are respectively captioned, Donald J. and Mary S. Moreaux v.
resulted in property damage. No injuries have been reported.
with model number PTC-902 and serial numbers between 35005-43008.
from October 2009 through October 2010 for about $25.
Northern District of Texas, Civil Action No. 3:09-CV-2392.
Defendants' reply was filed on October 8, 2010.
the performance of plan fiduciaries and fiduciary appointees.
the fiduciary breaches as alleged.
yielded, unspecified equitable relief, costs and attorneys' fees.
the Court on October 22, 2010.
settlement of a class action lawsuit filed by Patricia Ramirez.
unfair business practices and declaratory relief.
settlement required final court approval.
asserting that the Company violated California insurance laws.
provision at December 31, 2009.
Life Insurance Deferred Annuities Litigation.
due to steering or battery cable problems.
corrosion can cause the joint to crack, the report notes.
make the cars difficult to start or stall at low speeds.
Tenn., for the North American market. Frontiers made from Nov.
Central American markets also are in the recall, the report says.
July 8, 2010, the report discloses.
problem at no cost to the owners.
affected in the U.S, the report adds.
Exchange Commission for the quarter ended September 28, 2010.
November 1, 2005 and July 26, 2006.
Company is vigorously defending the lawsuit.
subsequently extended until August 10, 2009.
allow the plaintiff to conduct discovery.
reply in support of its motion on December 21, 2009.
the Company's motion for summary judgment.
the parties to resolve through mediation.
employee of the Company, on December 9, 2009.
might find just and proper.
prepared to vigorously defend the lawsuit.
Commission for the quarter ended September 28, 2010.
New Hampshire, against cigarette company Philip Morris USA.
than regular cigarettes, when in fact the tobacco is identical,"
governing class actions," Mr. Callahan said.
action suits against cigarette companies that manufacture "light"
rejected attempts to certify similar classes.
are part of a multi-district case in federal court.
Manchester. Ms. Lawrence could not be reached Tuesday last week.
cigarettes presented reduced health risks.
by using words such as 'Lights' and 'Lowered Tar & Nicotine,'"
that the number would be in the hundreds of thousands.
Lights and any profits the company made from the cigarettes.
Arnold & Porter in Washington, D.C., and New York.
come, overwhelming this State's already burdened judiciary,"
Lights in a way that resulted in less tar and less nicotine.
flavor and did not imply safe cigarettes.
president of the Tobacco Merchants Association.
order issued November 22, certified the case as a class action.
The court file already takes up eight folders.
were not pre-empted by federal law and could go forward.
Mr. Jayson said similar arguments could be used in New Hampshire.
or being deceptive?" Mr. Jayson said.
advertising or labeling tobacco products with the words "light,"
Gold cigarettes instead of Marlboro Lights.
dangers of drinking its caffeinated alcohol drinks.
the counsel for Pioneer Foods.
R1bn already paid in fines.
2007, and the deadline for a civil case is on Friday.
hearing the application at all.
they felt strongly enough to ask the court for a certificate.
water and the right of children to nutrition.
class was not required in order to mount a class action.
followed, an action would not be invalid without it.
"This matter is not urgent and should be dismissed with costs,"
right to food had been infringed.
busybodies bringing spurious litigation", Mr. McNally said.
Protection Act Litigation (Coordinated, May 28, 2007).
the personal information of any state resident to any advertiser.
summary judgment in one of the coordinated cases, Rine, et al., v.
Florida, filed August 1, 2006).
Imagitas pending an appellate decision in Rine.
ability to pursue further review of that decision has expired.
motion to dismiss these cases on October 8, 2010.
filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut.
The Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on September 20, 2010.
benefits, and were aided and abetted by the other defendants.
improper benefits, and fees and costs.
actions have now been consolidated.
allegations have been filed in Delaware Chancery Court: Nelson v.
consolidated, and a consolidated amended complaint has been filed.
there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigation.
claims and three class-based causes of action against the company.
company's resident screening reports, as required by 15 U.S.C.
punitive damages on her individual claims.
question, as required by 15 U.S.C. Section 1681i(f).
the Fair Credit Reporting Act and attorneys' fees and costs.
intend to defend it vigorously.
sponsored by Onex Partners, an affiliate of Onex Corporation.
Stanley Margolis v. Ralph Gronefeld, et al., Case No. 10-CI-6597.
ResCare, Onex and the members of the Company's Board of Directors.
that no competing offers will emerge for the Company.
abetted these alleged breaches of fiduciary duties.
litigation, received final Court approval in October 2010.
as the class action litigation.
adopted certain corporate remedial measures.
litigation, is pending final Court approval.
is currently expected to occur during the fourth quarter of 2010.
Merger Co. as defendants in the litigation.
referred to as the Consolidated Texas State Action.
the ExpressJet preliminary proxy statement filed with the U.S.
Securities and Exchange Commission on September 3, 2010.
the terms of an agreement in principle to resolve the Actions.
stockholders soliciting approval of the Merger.
the transactions contemplated by the Merger.
obtain the dismissal with prejudice of the Texas Federal Action.
filing with the SEC for the quarter ended September 30, 2010.
Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., the Spirit AeroSystems Holdings Inc.
The Boeing Company and Boeing retirement and health plan entities.
currently in the discovery process.
Boeing, thereby decreasing their benefits.
damages pursuant to breach of contract claims and attorney fees.
of a securities class action remains pending.
inflated commissions received by the underwriters of the offering.
parties have appealed the settlement and the appeal is pending.
Inc., et al., was filed on January 14, 2009 in the U.S.
South Carolina, and subsequently removed to the U.S.
District Court for the District of South Carolina.
IRS Section 1031 Tax Deferred Exchange Litigation (MDL 2054).
wrongdoing and failed to take appropriate steps to stop the same.
and has filed a motion to dismiss all claims.
The Court granted the motion to dismiss with leave to re-plead.
time, no legal action has been filed by the trustee.
of Florida for inclusion in Multi-District Litigation Case No.
2036 on December 1, 2009.
overdraft charges based on SunTrust Bank's reordering of charges."
complaint was filed on August 9, 2010.
in excess of the usury rate.
noted in its November 5, 2010 Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
denied their motion to dismiss regarding disclosure claims.
The Court dismissed portions of Plaintiff's first complaint.
certification, and has filed a motion to compel arbitration.
decision is on appeal to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals.
The case has been stayed pending the resolution of that appeal.
Corp., et al., v. SunTrust Banks, Inc., et al., in the U.S.
leave to amend, on September 10, 2010.
disclosed in a November 5, 2010, Form 10-Q filing with the U.S.
General Employees Retirement System v. SunTrust Banks, Inc. et al.
Action Complaint on December 23, 2009.
amount of charge-offs related to its loans.
and no appeal was filed prior to the deadline for doing so.
SunTrust Banks Inc's affiliates, SunTrust Robinson Humphrey Inc.
Colonial BancGroup, Inc. Securities Litigation.
securities of Colonial BancGroup and seeks unspecified damages.
respect to the motion to dismiss.
System Inc. of Florida, and Posen Construction Inc. of Estero.
McDonnell, who is co-counsel in the lawsuit with Gary L. Green.
wife Donna and aunt, Cathy, said gas went out about 6:30 p.m.
Nov. 11 and didn't return until late afternoon Nov. 16.
make it work with propane and a limited menu, but it didn't work."
the next day. It was just crazy."
most part, we were slow for the following week."
warned not to dig until the lines were remarked.
occurred on Thursday . . ."
compensate for the loss of gas.
project and blame Posen for continuing work despite warnings.
in Naples, who said, "At this time, we have no comment."
be responsible for paying customer losses.
and Exchange Commissio on November 5, 2010.
trial court for further proceedings.
alleging price-fixing activities remains pending.
financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.
company filed its Supreme Court petition in August.
counterparts and offered them fewer opportunities for advancement.
female workers in stores throughout the nation.
The case involves claims that could amount to billions of dollars.
take place next spring, with a decision by July.
individual claims into one big case.
actions that primarily seek monetary relief.
the class action to proceed on the issue of punitive damages.
consideration at the Supreme Court's private conference last week.
the case or leave the lower-court ruling in place.
post debit card transactions to consumer deposit accounts.
for the Southern District of Florida.
ordering remediation in the approximate amount of $203 million.
On October 26, 2010, a final judgment was entered in Gutierrez.
Wells Fargo says it will appeal.
similarly situated v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al., Case No.
members to be deeded back to Plaintiff and other class members.
only be effected by action of the Illinois legislature.
limited the reach of the U.S. legal system, according to experts.
International Firms; Picking the Deep Pockets."
counsel in Proskauer's Litigation Department.
also very creative and adaptive."
provisions of the court's decisions.
fees from defendants, Mr. Sinogatti said.
the entity in a U.S. Court.
believes have violated securities laws.
"push the envelope" in developing cases.
process, including the discovery stages.
sufficient limits outside of the United States.
issue in the United States, elsewhere it is a criminal violation.
amendment doesn't apply" in other countries.
She emphasized the need for brokers to design policies locally.
require policies be written on an admitted basis, she said.
policy would probably not deal with.
understand what needs to be done."

References: v.

 v. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v.

 v.

 v.

v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.

in fine
 v.

 v.

 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.