Source: http://www.edpci.com/Resumes/seidel_legal.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 22:35:21+00:00

Document:
Designated as testimonial witness and research consultant in Northern Telecom V. EXP. Provided background research and a technical opinion; did not testify at deposition or trial.
Retained as an expert witness in Wang v FileNet in a case involving a contract dispute. See also 7/2001  8/2001, FileNet v Chubb Group of Insurance Companies.
Designated as testimonial witness in Compuware v. Dupont matter for Cooley Godward, LLP. Case involved questions related to system level operation of Abend "abnormal end of program" application. Prepared expert report; deposed. Case disposition unknown.
Retained as an expert witness in PremiereBank v EDS, on behalf of Nelson Mullens, in a software system contract dispute and Y2K software issues. Disposition unknown.
Designated as a consulting expert in Omega Cabinets, Inc. v. Jump Services on behalf of Dorsey & Whitney LLP. The case involved the non-delivery of software and services for a customized ERP system for a furniture manufacturer. Consulted to counsel in this matter. Case settled.
Retained as an expert witness in America West v Informix on behalf of Cohen, Kennedy, in a contract dispute over the design and development of custom software. Case disposition unknown.
Designated as a consulting expert in Carrera-Maximus, Inc. v. Halis, Inc., on behalf of Halis for Richard Hart, Esq. This project involved a dispute over delivery of an accounts receivable function that was one component of a much larger project. Consulted to the attorney and client regarding the matter. Case settled.
Designated as a consulting expert in an insurance claim in a matter involving FileNet and CGU on behalf of Chubb Group of Insurance Companies. The project involved the non-delivery of contracted software and services. Consulted to the Litigation Examiner on the case and prepared a report regarding the matter. Case disposition not disclosed.
Retained as a consulting expert in Infosys v. Onnanet on behalf of Rivkin Radler, LLP in a case involving a contract dispute over web development work. Mr. Seidel reviewed software development documents and provided an informal opinion as to the quality and usability of those documents for building a commercial website. Case disposition not disclosed.
Designated as a consulting expert in Insevo, Inc. v. Codify Inc. and Resource Adapters, Inc. on behalf of Crosby, Heafey, Roach & May. The project involved a contract dispute and theft of trade secrets in the design of software products. Consulted to counsel and supported counsel in depositions. Case settled.
Designated as a consulting expert in KPMG Consulting, LLV v. Cable & Wireless Global Limited on behalf of McKool Smith. The case involved a contract dispute over custom software and services for the telecommunications industry. Case settled shortly after designation.
Designated as a testifying expert in eProfile v. 1stWebBankDirect on behalf of Stevens Lee, LLP in a case involving a contract dispute over web development work. Mr. Seidel prepared an expert report and a rebuttal report, was deposed, and testified before a panel of three arbitration judges in the matter. Case settled positively.
Designated as a consulting expert in Accucorp v Kodak Software, on behalf of McCutchen, Doyle, Brown, and Enersen. The case involved a dispute over the inclusion of proprietary software code into a commercial package. Mr. Seidel reviewed the two products and provided assistance to the attorneys in the case.
Retained as a consulting expert in FreeMarkets v Hologix on behalf of the two parties in a case involving development and delivery of custom software for a web-based commercial auction site. Mr. Seidel and a co-consultant prepared a joint report for the judge in this matter. Disposition not disclosed.
Retained as an expert witness in comData v IBM on behalf of Branham & Day, P.C. in a case involving a contract dispute over performance and billing issues. Mr. Seidel researched a number of technical issues in the case. Case settled prior to any expert report or deposition.
Retained as an expert witness on behalf of Stroock & Stroock & Lavan, LLP and subsequently by Bartko, Zankel in a case that is still in progress.
Retained as a neutral expert witness in the matter of Systems Management Inc v Greater Minnesota Convention & Visitors Association and Eutech, in a case involving a dispute over software copying and derivative works, on behalf of The Webb Law Firm, Pietragallo Bosick & Gordon, LLP, and Fredrickson & Byron, PA. Case involved database and software analysis and comparisons. Suit settled pursuant to submission of our report.
Retained as an expert witness in the matter of eForce Global Inc v Bank of America Corporation in a case involving a dispute over project management and contract terms, on behalf of Martin H. Kresse. Case involved analysis of software and project management of a multi-party development project. Mr. Seidel prepared an expert report; no deposition was given as the case was stopped following a Motion for Summary Judgement.

References: V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.