Source: https://stus.com/United-States-v-OHagan-cartoon-ccc0071
Timestamp: 2019-04-20 01:11:18+00:00

Document:
Misappropriation confidential information fraud ethical wall misappropriation theory.
Perretta v. Prometheus Development Company, Inc; A partnership agreement provision that allows an interested partner to count its votes is manifestly unreasonable under California corporations law; limited partner; limited partnership; ratification.
Jones v. Harris Associates L.P.; Under section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act, a financial adviser has a fiduciary duty and owes an obligation of candor in negotiation, as well as honesty in performance, but not for negotiating own salary.
Singer v. Singer; A partner's duty to the partnership is not violated by conduct that is specifically authorized by the partnership agreement; constructive trust.
Dreifuerst v. Dreifuerst; Unless otherwise agreed, partners who have not wrongfully dissolved the partnership have a right to wind up the partnership and force a sale of the partnership assets; partnership at will.
Farnsworth v. Deaver; When a partnership is winding up, a partner with a negative balance in his or her capital account must repay that negative balance and return the account to zero.
Friese v. Superior Court; Laws that regulate securities trading do not relate to the internal affairs of a corporation, so lawsuits relating to the sales of securities are not governed solely by the state of incorporation.
Sutherland v. Sutherland; A provision in a corporate charter that purports to exonerate directors from breach of loyalty claims is unenforceable.
In re Trados Inc. Shareholder Litigation; When the interests of common stockholders diverge from preferred stockholders, the directors of a corporation have a duty to exercise their discretion in favor of the interests of common stockholders.
Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. v. Airgas, Inc.; Defensive measures against takeovers are not impermissibly preclusive if they delay a bidder from obtaining control of a board as long as obtaining control in the future is realistically attainable.
Gordon v. Goodyear; a shareholder derivative action must state with particularity any effort made by the plaintiff to obtain the desired action from the directors and the reasons for not obtaining the action or making the effort.
Paul v. China MediaExpressHoldings, Inc.; shareholder may inspect the books and records of a corporation to investigate fraud and mismanagement, and the ability of the board to act independently and in good faith.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.