Source: http://xrpp.iucr.org/Db/ch3o1v0001/sec3o1o3/
Timestamp: 2019-04-21 11:12:21+00:00

Document:
In the Landau theory, presented in the preceding Section 3.1.2 , symmetry considerations and thermodynamics are closely interwoven. These two aspects can be, at least to some extent, disentangled and some basic symmetry conditions formulated and utilized without explicitly invoking thermodynamics. Statements which follow directly from symmetry are exact but usually do not yield numerical results. These can be obtained by a subsequent thermodynamic or statistical treatment.
The central point of this section is Table 3.1.3.1 , which contains results of symmetry analysis for a large class of equitranslational phase transitions and presents data on changes of property tensors at most ferroic phase transitions. Notions and statements relevant to these two applications are explained in Sections 3.1.3.1 and 3.1.3.2 , respectively. Table 3.1.3.1 with a detailed explanation is displayed in Section 3.1.3.3 . Examples illustrating possible uses of the table are given in Section 3.1.3.4 .
A basic role is played in symmetry considerations by the relation between the space group of the high symmetry parent or prototype phase, the space group of the low-symmetry ferroic phase and the order parameter : The low-symmetry group consists of all operations of the high-symmetry group that leave the order parameter invariant. By the term order parameter we mean the primary order parameter, i.e. that set of degrees of freedom whose coefficient of the quadratic invariant changes sign at the phase-transition temperature (see Sections 3.1.2.2.4 and 3.1.2.4.2 ).
What matters in these considerations is not the physical nature of but the transformation properties of , which are expressed by the representation of . The order parameter with components can be treated as a vector in a -dimensional carrier space of the representation , and the low-symmetry group comprises all operations of that do not change this vector. If is a real one-dimensional representation, then the low-symmetry group consists of those operations for which the matrices [or characters ] of the representation equal one, . This condition is satisfied by one half of all operations of (index of in is two) and thus the real one-dimensional representation determines the ferroic group unambiguously.
A real multidimensional representation can induce several low-symmetry groups. A general vector of the carrier space of is invariant under all operations of a group , called the kernel of representation , which is a normal subgroup of comprising all operations for which the matrix is the unit matrix. Besides that, special vectors of – specified by relations restricting values of order-parameter components (e.g. some components of equal zero, some components are equal etc.) – may be invariant under larger groups than the kernel . These groups are called epikernels of (Ascher & Kobayashi, 1977 ). The kernel and epikernels of represent potential symmetries of the ferroic phases associated with the representation . Thermodynamic considerations can decide which of these phases is stable at a given temperature and external fields.
As explained in Section 1.2.3 and illustrated by the example of gadolinium molybdate in Section 3.1.2.5 , an irreducible representation of a space group is specified by a vector of the first Brillouin zone, and by an irreducible representation of the little group of k, denoted . It turns out that the vector k determines the change of the translational symmetry at the phase transition (see e.g Tolédano & Tolédano, 1987 ; Izyumov & Syromiatnikov, 1990 ; Tolédano & Dmitriev, 1996 ). Thus, unless one restricts the choice of the vector , one would have an infinite number of phase transitions with different changes of the translational symmetry.
In this section, we restrict ourselves to representations with zero vector (this situation is conveniently denoted as the point). Then there is no change of translational symmetry at the transition. In this case, the group is called an equitranslational or translationengleiche (t) subgroup of , and this change of symmetry will be called an equitranslational symmetry descent . An equitranslational phase transition is a transition with an equitranslational symmetry descent .
Any ferroic space-group-symmetry descent uniquely defines the corresponding symmetry descent , where G and F are the point groups of the space groups and , respectively. Conversely, the equitranslational subgroup of a given space group is uniquely determined by the point-group symmetry descent , where G and F are point groups of space groups and , respectively. In other words, a point-group symmetry descent defines the set of all equitranslational space-group symmetry descents , where runs through all space groups with the point group G. All equitranslational space-group symmetry descents are available in the software GI KoBo-1, where more details about the equitranslational subgroups can also be found.
Irreducible and reducible representations of the parent point group G are related in a similar way to irreducible representations with vector for all space groups with the point group G by a simple process called engendering (Jansen & Boon, 1967 ). The translation subgroup of is a normal subgroup and the point group G is isomorphic to a factor group . This means that to every element there correspond all elements of the space group with the same linear constituent g, the same non-primitive translation and any vector of the translation group (see Section 1.2.3.1 ). If a representation of the point group G is given by matrices , then the corresponding engendered representation of a space group with vector assigns the same matrix to all elements of .
From this it further follows that a representation of a point group G describes transformation properties of the primary order parameter for all equitranslational phase transitions with point-symmetry descent . This result is utilized in the presentation of Table 3.1.3.1 .
The primary order parameter expresses the `difference' between the low-symmetry and high-symmetry structures and can be, in a microscopic description, identified with spontaneous displacements of atoms (frozen in soft mode) or with an increase of order of molecular arrangement. To find a microscopic interpretation of order parameters, it is necessary to perform mode analysis (see e.g. Rousseau et al., 1981 ; Aroyo & Perez-Mato, 1998 ), which takes into account the microscopic structure of the parent phase.
Physical properties of crystals in a continuum description are described by physical property tensors (see Section 1.1.1.2 ), for short property tensors [equivalent expressions are matter tensors (Nowick, 1995 ; Wadhawan, 2000 ) or material tensors (Shuvalov, 1988 )]. Property tensors are usually expressed in a Cartesian (rectangular) coordinate system [in Russian textbooks called a crystallophysical system of coordinates (Sirotin & Shaskolskaya, 1982 ; Shuvalov, 1988 )] which is related to the crystallographic coordinate system (IT A , 2005 ) by convention (see IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity, 1987 ; Sirotin & Shaskolskaya, 1982 ; Shuvalov, 1988 ). In what follows, Cartesian coordinates will mean coordinates in the crystallophysical system and tensor components will mean components in this coordinate system.
As explained in Section 1.1.4 , the number of independent components of property tensors depends on the point-group symmetry of the crystal: the higher this symmetry is, the smaller this number is. Lowering of point-group symmetry at ferroic phase transitions is, therefore, always accompanied by an increased number of independent components of some property tensors. This effect manifests itself by the appearance of morphic (Strukov & Levanyuk, 1998 ) or spontaneous tensor components, which are zero in the parent phase and nonzero in the ferroic phase, and/or by symmetry-breaking increments of nonzero components in the ferroic phase that break relations between these tensor components which hold in the parent phase. Thus, for example, the strain tensor has two independent components in a tetragonal phase and four independent components in a monoclinic phase. In a tetragonal-to-monoclinic phase transition there is one morphic component and one relation is broken by the symmetry-breaking increment .
Changes of property tensors at a ferroic phase transition can be described in an alternative manner in which no symmetrybreaking increments but only morphic terms appear. As we have seen, the transformation properties of the primary order parameter are described by a -dimensional R-irreducible matrix representation of the group G. One can form linear combinations of Cartesian tensor components that transform according to the same representation . These linear combinations will be called components of a principal tensor parameter of the ferroic phase transition with a symmetry descent . Equivalent designations are covariant tensor components (Kopský, 1979a ) or symmetry coordinates (Nowick, 1995 ) of representation of group G. Unlike the primary order parameter of a ferroic phase transition, a principal tensor parameter is not uniquely defined since one can always form further principal tensor parameters from Cartesian components of higher-rank tensors. However, only the principal tensor parameters formed from components of one, or even several, property tensors up to rank four are physically significant.
A principal tensor parameter introduced in this way has the same basic properties as the primary order parameter: it is zero in the parent phase and nonzero in the ferroic phase, and transforms according to the same R-irep . However, these two quantities have different physical nature: the primary order parameter of an equitranslational phase transition is a homogeneous microscopic distortion of the parent phase, whereas the principal tensor parameter describes the macroscopic manifestation of this microscopic distortion. Equitranslational phase transitions thus possess the unique property that their primary order parameter can be represented by principal tensor parameters which can be identified and measured by macroscopic techniques.
If the primary order parameter transforms as a vector, the corresponding principal tensor parameter is a dielectric polarization (spontaneous polarization) and the equitranslational phase transition is called a proper ferroelectric phase transition. Similarly, if the primary order parameter transforms as components of a symmetric second-rank tensor, the corresponding principal tensor parameter is a spontaneous strain (or spontaneous deformation) and the equitranslational phase transition is called a proper ferroelastic phase transition.
A conspicuous feature of equitranslational phase transitions is a steep anomaly (theoretically an infinite singularity for continuous transitions) of the generalized susceptibility associated with the primary order parameter, especially the dielectric susceptibility near a proper ferroelectric transition (see Section 3.1.2.2.5 ) and the elastic compliance near a proper ferroelastic transition (see e.g. Tolédano & Tolédano, 1987 ; Tolédano & Dmitriev, 1996 ; Strukov & Levanyuk, 1998 ).
Any symmetry property of a ferroic phase transition has its pendant in domain structure. Thus it appears that any two ferroic single domain states differ in the values of the principal tensor parameters, i.e. principal tensor parameters ensure tensor distinction of any two ferroic domain states. If, in particular, the principal order parameter is polarization, then any two ferroic domain states differ in the direction of spontaneous polarization. Such a ferroic phase is called a full ferroelectric phase (Aizu, 1970 ). In this case, the number of ferroic domain states equals the number of ferroelectric domain states. Similarly, if any two ferroic domain states exhibit different spontaneous strain, then the ferroic phase is a full ferroelastic phase. An equivalent condition is an equal number of ferroic and ferroelastic domain states (see Sections 3.4.2.1 and 3.4.2.2 ).
The principal tensor parameters do not cover all changes of property tensors at the phase transition. Let be a -dimensional matrix R-irep of G with an epikernel (or kernel) L which is an intermediate group between F and G, in other words, L is a supergroup of F and a subgroup of G, This means that a vector of the -dimensional carrier space of is invariant under operations of L. The vector specifies a secondary order parameter of the transition, i.e. is a morphic quantity, the appearance of which lowers the symmetry from G to L (for more details on secondary order parameters see Tolédano & Tolédano, 1987 ; Tolédano & Dmitriev, 1996 ). Intermediate groups (3.1.3.1) can be conveniently traced in lattices of subgroups displayed in Figs. 3.1.3.1 and 3.1.3.2 .
Lattice of subgroups of the group . Conjugate subgroups are depicted as a pile of cards. In the software GI KoBo-1, one can pull out individual conjugate subgroups by clicking on the pile.
One can form linear combinations of Cartesian tensor components that transform according to . These combinations are components of a secondary tensor parameter which represents a macroscopic appearance of the secondary order parameter .
If a secondary tensor parameter is a spontaneous polarization and no primary order parameter with this property exists, the phase transition is called an improper ferroelectric phase transition (Dvořák, 1974 ; Levanyuk & Sannikov, 1974 ). Similarly, an improper ferroelastic phase transition is specified by existence of a secondary tensor parameter that transforms as components of the symmetric second-rank tensor (spontaneous strain) and by absence of a primary order parameter with this property. Unlike proper ferroelectric and proper ferroelastic phase transitions, which are confined to equitranslational phase transitions, the improper ferroelectric and improper ferroelastic phase transitions appear most often in non-equitranslational phase transitions. Classic examples are an improper ferroelectric phase transition in gadolinium molybdate (see Section 3.1.2.5.2 ) and an improper ferroelastic phase transition in strontium titanate (see Section 3.1.5.2.3 ). Examples of equitranslational improper ferroelectric and ferroelastic symmetry descents can be found in Table 3.1.3.2 .
Secondary tensor parameters and corresponding susceptibilities exhibit less pronounced changes near the transition than those associated with the primary order parameter (see e.g. Tolédano & Tolédano, 1987 ; Tolédano & Dmitriev, 1996 ; Strukov & Levanyuk, 1998 ).
In tensor distinction of domains, the secondary tensor parameters play a secondary role in a sense that some but not all ferroic domain states exhibit different values of the secondary tensor parameters. This property forms a basis for the concept of partial ferroic phases (Aizu, 1970 ): A ferroic phase is a partial ferroelectric (ferroelastic) one if some but not all domain states differ in spontaneous polarization (spontaneous strain). A non-ferroelectric phase denotes a ferroic phase which is either non-polar or which possesses a unique polar direction available already in the parent phase. A non-ferroelastic phase exhibits no spontaneous strain.
(1) Inverse Landau problem (Ascher & Kobayashi, 1977 ) of equitranslational phase transitions: For a given equitranslational symmetry descent (determined for example from diffraction experiments), find the representation of that specifies the transformation properties of the primary order parameter. Solution: In Table 3.1.3.1 , one finds a physically irreducible representation of the point group G of with epikernel F (point group of ). For some symmetry descents from cubic point groups , and , the inverse Landau problem has two solutions, which are given in Table 3.1.3.2 .
Property tensors that appear in this table: enantiomorphism, chirality; dielectric polarization; strain; optical activity; piezoelectric tensor; electrogyration tensor; piezo-optic tensor ( ; ). Applications of this table to symmetry analysis of equitranslational phase transitions and to changes of property tensors at ferroic transitions are explained in Section 3.1.3.3 .
If for a given symmetry descent no appropriate R-irep exists in Table 3.1.3.1 , then the primary order parameter transforms according to a reducible representation of G. These transitions are always discontinuous and can be accomplished with several reducible representations. Some symmetry descents can be associated with an irreducible representation and with several reducible representations. All these transitions are treated in the software GI KoBo-1 and in Kopský (2001 ). All point-group symmetry descents are listed in Table 3.4.2.7 and can be traced in lattices of subgroups (see Figs. 3.1.3.1 and 3.1.3.2 ).
The solution of the inverse Landau problem – i.e. the identification of the representation relevant to symmetry descent – enables one to determine the corresponding nomal mode (so-called soft mode) of the transition (see e.g. Rousseau et al., 1981 ). We note that this step requires additional knowledge of the crystal structure, whereas other conclusions of the analysis hold for any crystal structure with a given symmetry descent . Normal-mode determination reveals the dynamic microscopic nature of the instability of the crystal lattice which leads to the phase transition (for more details and examples, see Section 3.1.5).
The representation further determines the principal tensor parameters associated with the primary order parameter . If one of them is a vector (polarization) the soft mode is infrared-active in the parent phase; if it is a symmetric second-rank tensor (spontaneous strain), the soft mode is Raman active in this phase. Furthermore, the R-irep determines the polynomial in components of in the Landau free energy (basic invariant polynomials, called integrity bases, are available in the software GI KoBo-1 and in Kopský, 2001 ) and allows one to decide whether the necessary conditions of continuity of the transition (so-called Landau and Lifshitz conditions) are fulfilled.
(2) Direct Landau problem of equitranslational phase transitions: For a given space group of the parent phase and the R-irep (specifying the transformation properties of the primary order parameter ), find the corresponding equitranslational space group of the ferroic phase. To solve this task, one first finds in Table 3.1.3.1 the point group F that corresponds to point group G of space group and to the given R-irep . The point-group symmetry descent thus obtained specifies uniquely the equitranslational subgroup of that can be found in the lattices of equitranslational subgroups of space groups available in the software GI KoBo-1 (see Section 3.1.6 ).
(3) Secondary tensor parameters of an equitranslational phase transition . These parameters are specified by the representation of G associated with a symmetry descent , where L is an intermediate group [see equation (3.1.3.1) ]. In other words, the secondary tensor parameters of the transition are identical with principal tensor parameters of the transition . To each intermediate group L there corresponds a set of secondary tensor parameters. All intermediate subgroups of a symmetry descent can be deduced from lattices of subgroups in Figs. 3.1.3.1 and 3.1.3.2 .
The representation specifies transformation properties of the secondary tensor parameter and thus determines e.g its infrared and Raman activity in the parent phase and enables one to make a mode analysis. Representation together with determine the coupling between secondary and primary tensor parameters. The explicit form of these faint interactions (Aizu, 1973 ; Kopský, 1979d ) can be found in the software GI KoBo-1 and in Kopský (2001 ).
(4) Changes of property tensors at a ferroic phase transition. These changes are described by tensor parameters that depend only on the point-group-symmetry descent . This means that the same principal tensor parameters and secondary tensor parameters appear in all equitranslational and in all non-equitranslational transitions with the same . The only difference is that in non-equitranslational ferroic phase transitions a principal tensor parameter corresponds to a secondary ferroic order parameter. It still plays a leading role in tensor distinction of domains, since it exhibits different values in any two ferroic domain states (see Section 3.4.2.3 ). Changes of property tensors at ferroic phase transitions are treated in detail in the software GI KoBo-1 and in Kopský (2001 ).
We note that Table 3.1.3.1 covers only those point-group symmetry descents that are `driven' by R-ireps of G. All possible point-group symmetry descents are listed in Table 3.4.2.7 . Principal and secondary tensor parameters of symmetry descents associated with reducible representations are combinations of tensor parameters appearing in Table 3.1.3.1 (for a detailed explanation, see the manual of the software GI KoBo-1 and Kopský, 2000 ). Necessary data for treating these cases are available in the software GI KoBo-1 and Kopský (2001 ).
Parent symmetry G: the short international (Hermann–Mauguin) and the Schoenflies symbol of the point group G of the parent phase are given. Subscripts specify the orientation of symmetry elements (generators) in the Cartesian crystallophysical coordinate system of the group G (see Figs. 3.4.2.3 and 3.4.2.4 , and Tables 3.4.2.5 and 3.4.2.6 ).
R-irep : physically irreducible representation of the group G in the spectroscopic notation. This representation defines transformation properties of the primary order parameter and of the principal tensor parameters. Each complex irreducible representation is combined with its complex conjugate and thus a real physically irreducible representation R-irep is formed. Matrices of R-ireps are given explicitly in the the software GI KoBo-1.
(La) below the symbol of the irreducible representation indicates that the Landau condition is violated, hence the transition cannot be continuous (second order). The Landau condition requires the absence of the third-degree invariant polynomial of the order-parameter components (the symmetrized triple product must not contain the identity representation of G). For more details see Lyubarskii (1960 ), Kociński (1983 , 1990 ), Tolédano & Tolédano (1987 ), Izyumov & Syromiatnikov (1990 ) and Tolédano & Dmitriev (1996 ).
(Li) below the symbol of the irreducible representation means that the Lifshitz condition is violated, hence the transition to a homogeneous ferroic phase is not continuous. The Lifshitz condition demands the absence of invariant terms that couple bilinearly the order-parameter components with their spatial derivatives that are not exact differentials (the antisymmetric square has no representation in common with the vector representation of G). For more details see Lyubarskii (1960 ), Kociński (1983 , 1990 ), Tolédano & Tolédano (1987 ), Izyumov & Syromiatnikov (1990 ) and Tolédano & Dmitriev (1996 ).
If there is no symbol (La) and/or (Li) below the symbol of the R-irep (i.e. if both Landau and Lifshitz conditions are fulfilled), then the R-irep is called an active representation. In the opposite case, the R-irep is a passive representation (Lyubarskii, 1960 ; Kociński, 1983 , 1990 ).
Standard variables: components of the order parameter in the carrier space of the irreducible representation expressed in so-called standard variables (see the manual of the software GI KoBo-1). Upper and lower indices and the typeface of standard variables allow one to identify to which irreducible representation they belong. Standard variables of one-dimensional representations are denoted by (Sans Serif typeface), two- or three-dimensional R-ireps by or , respectively. Upper indices + and − correspond to the lower indices g (gerade) and u (ungerade) of spectroscopic notation, respectively. The lower index specifies to which irreducible representation the variable belongs.
For multidimensional representations, a general vector of the carrier space is given in the last row; this vector is invariant under the kernel of that appears as a low-symmetry group in column . The other rows contain special vectors defined by equal or zero values of some standard variables; these vectors are invariant under epikernels of given in column .
: short international (Hermann–Mauguin) and Schoenflies symbol of the point group which describes the symmetry of the first single domain state of the ferroic (low-symmetry) phase. The subscripts define the orientation of symmetry elements (generators) of in the Cartesian crystallophysical coordinate system of the group G (see Figs. 3.4.2.3 and 3.4.2.4 , and Tables 3.4.2.5 and 3.4.2.6 ). This specifies the orientation of the group , which is a prerequisite for domain structure analysis (see Chapter 3.4 ).
: number of subgroups conjugate to under G. If , the group is a normal subgroup of G (see Section 3.2.3 ).
Principal tensor parameters: covariant tensor components, i.e. linear combinations of Cartesian tensor components that transform according to the same matrix R-irep as the primary order parameter . Principal tensor parameters are given in this form in the software GI KoBo-1 and in Kopský (2001 ).
This presentation is in certain situations not practical, since property tensors are usually described by numerical values of their Cartesian components. Then it is important to know morphic Cartesian tensor components and symmetry-breaking increments of nonzero Cartesian components that appear spontaneously in the ferroic phase. The bridge between these two presentations is provided by the conversion equations that express Cartesian tensor components as linear combinations of principal and secondary covariant components (for more details on tensorial covariants and conversion equations see Appendix E of the manual for GI KoBo-1 and Kopský, 2001 ).
We illustrate the situation on a transition with symmetry descent . In Table 3.1.3.1 , we find that the principal tensor parameter transforms according to irreducible representation with standard variable . The corresponding covariant can be found in Appendix E of the manual of GI KoBo-1 (or in Kopský, 2001 ), where one also finds an invariant containing and : . The corresponding conversion equations are: , . In the parent phase , hence , whereas in the ferroic phase , . The symmetry-breaking increments describe thus the changes of the Cartesian components that correspond to the nonzero principal tensor component .
An analogous situation occurs frequently in trigonal and hexagonal parent groups, where (or ) transforms like the first or second component of the principal tensor parameter. In these cases, the corresponding symmetry-breaking increments of Cartesian components are again related: (or ).
We note that relations like do not imply that these components transform as the standard variable. Though these components are proportional to the principal tensor parameter in the first domain state, they cannot be transformed to corresponding components in other domain states as easily as covariant tensor components of the principal tensor parameter.
In general, it is useful to consider a tensor parameter as a vector in the carrier space of the respective representation. Then the Cartesian components are projections of this vector on the Cartesian basis of the tensor space.
The presentation of the principal tensor parameters in the column Principal tensor parameters of this table is a compromise: whenever conversion equations lead to simple relations between morphic Cartesian components and/or symmetry-breaking increments, we present these relations, in some cases together with corresponding covariants. In the more complicated cases, only the covariants are given. The corresponding conversion equations and labelling of covariants are given at the beginning of that part of the table which covers hexagonal and cubic parent groups G. In the main tables of the software GI KoBo-1, the principal tensor parameters and the secondary tensor parameters up to rank 4 are given consistently in covariant form. Labelling of covariant components and conversion equations are given in Appendix E of the manual.
The principal tensor parameters presented in Table 3.1.3.1 represent a particular choice of property tensors for standard variables given in the second column. To save space, property tensors are selected in the following way: polarization P and strain u are always listed; if none of their components transform according to , then components of one axial and one polar tensor (if available) appearing in Table 3.1.3.3 are given. Principal parameters of two different property tensors are separated by a semicolon. If two different components of the same property tensor transform in the same way, they are separated by a comma.
Important note: To make Table 3.1.3.1 compatible with the software GI KoBo-1 and with Kopský (2001 ), coefficients of property tensors in matrix notation with contracted indices 4, 5, 6 do not contain the numerical factors 2 and 4 which are usually introduced to preserve a compact form (without these factors) of linear constitutive relations [see Chapter 1.1 , Nye (1985 ) and especially Appendices E and F of Sirotin & Shaskolskaya (1982 )]. This explains the differences in matrix coefficients appearing in Table 3.1.3.1 and those presented in Chapter 1.1 or in Nye (1985 ) and in Sirotin & Shaskolskaya (1982 ). Thus e.g. for the symmetry descent , we find in Table 3.1.3.1 the principal tensor parameters , whereas according to Chapter 1.1 or e.g. to Nye (1985 ) or Sirotin & Shaskolskaya (1982 ) these coefficients for are related by equations .
Property tensors and symbols of their components that can be found in Table 3.1.3.1 are given in the left-hand half of Table 3.1.3.3 . The right-hand half presents other tensors that transform in the same way as those on the left and form, therefore, covariant tensor components of the same form as those given in the column Principal tensor parameters. Principal and secondary tensor parameters for all property tensors that appear in Table 3.1.3.3 are available in the software GI KoBo-1.
: number of ferroic single domain states that differ in the primary order parameter and in the principal tensor parameters.
: number of ferroelastic single domain states. If , or , the ferroic phase is, respectively, a full, partial or non-ferroelastic one.
: number of ferroelectric single domain states. If , or , the ferroic phase is, repectively, a full, partial or non-ferroelectric one ( or correspond to a non-polar or to a polar parent phase, respectively) (see Section 3.4.2 ).
Example 3.1.3.4.1. Phase transition in triglycine sulfate (TGS). Assume that the space groups of both parent (high-symmetry) and ferroic (low-symmetry) phases are known: , . The same number of formula units in the primitive unit cell in both phases suggests that the transition is an equitranslational one. This conclusion can be checked in the lattice of equitranslational subgroups of the software GI KoBo-1. There we find for the low-symmetry space group the symbol , where the vector in parentheses expresses the shift of the origin with respect to the conventional origin given in IT A (2005 ).
In Table 3.1.3.1 , one finds that the corresponding point-group-symmetry descent is associated with irreducible representation . The corresponding principal tensor parameters of lowest rank are the pseudoscalar (enantiomorphism or chirality) and the vector of spontaneous polarization with one nonzero morphic component – the transition is a proper ferroelectric one. The non-ferroelastic ( ) full ferroelectric phase has two ferroelectric domain states ( ). Other principal tensor parameters (morphic tensor components that transform according to ) are available in the software GI KoBo-1: , , , ; , , , , , , , . Property tensors with these components are listed in Table 3.1.3.3 . As shown in Section 3.4.2 , all these components change sign when one passes from one domain state to the other. Since there is no intermediate group between G and F, there are no secondary tensor parameters.
Example 3.1.3.4.2. Phase transitions in barium titanate (BaTiO3). We shall illustrate the solution of the inverse Landau problem and the need to correlate the crystallographic system with the Cartesian crystallophysical coordinate system. The space-group type of the parent phase is , and those of the three ferroic phases are , , , all with one formula unit in the primitive unit cell.
This information is not complete. To perform mode analysis, we must specify these space groups by saying that the lattice symbol P in the first case and the lattice symbol R in the third case are given with reference to the cubic crystallographic basis ( ), while lattice symbol C in the second case is given with reference to crystallographic basis . If we now identify vectors of the cubic crystallographic basis with vectors of the Cartesian basis by , , , where , , are three orthonormal vectors, we can see that the corresponding point groups are , , .
Notice that without specification of crystallographic bases one could interpret the point group of the space group as . Bases are therefore always specified in lattices of equitranslational subgroups of the space groups that are available in the software GI KoBo-1, where we can check that all three symmetry descents are equitranslational.
In Table 3.1.3.1 , we find that these three ferroic subgroups are epikernels of the R-irep with the following principal tensor components: , , , respectively. Other principal tensor parameters can be found in the main tables of the software GI KoBo-1. The knowledge of the representation allows one to perform soft-mode analysis (see e.g. Rousseau et al., 1981 ).
For the tetragonal ferroelectric phase with , we find in Fig. 3.1.3.1 an intermediate group . In Table 3.1.3.1 , we check that this is an epikernel of the R-irep with secondary tensor parameter . This phase is a full (proper) ferroelectric and partial ferroelastic one.
More details about symmetry aspects of structural phase transitions can be found in monographs by Izyumov & Syromiatnikov (1990 ), Kociński (1983 , 1990 ), Landau & Lifshitz (1969 ), Lyubarskii (1960 ), Tolédano & Dmitriev (1996 ) and Tolédano & Tolédano (1987 ). Group–subgroup relations of space groups are treated extensively in IT A1 (2004 ).
IEEE Standard on Piezoelectricity STD 176–1987. (1987). New York: The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. This IEEE Std 176–1987 is reproduced in IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control. (1996). 43, No. 5.
International Tables for Crystallography (2004). Vol. A1. Symmetry relations between space groups, edited by H. Wondratschek & U. Müller. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Aizu, K. (1970). Possible species of ferromagnetic, ferroelectric, and ferroelastic crystals. Phys. Rev. B, 2, 754–772.
Aizu, K. (1973). Second order ferroic states. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn, 34, 121–128.
Aroyo, M. I. & Perez-Mato, J. M. (1998). Symmetry mode analysis of displacive phase transitions using International Tables for Crystallography. Acta Cryst. A54, 19–30.
Ascher, E. & Kobayashi, J. (1977). Symmetry and phase transitions: the inverse Landau problem. J. Phys. C: Solid State Phys. 10, 1349–1363.
Dvořák, V. (1974). Improper ferroelectrics. Ferroelectrics, 7, 1–9.
Indenbom, V. L. (1960). Phase transitions without change in the number of atoms in the unit cell of the crystal. Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 5, 105–115.
Izyumov, Yu. A. & Syromiatnikov, V. N. (1990). Phase transitions and crystal symmetry. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Janovec, V., Dvořák, V. & Petzelt, J. (1975). Symmetry classification and properties of equi-translation structural phase transitions. Czech. J. Phys. B25, 1362–1396.
Jansen, L. & Boon, M. (1967). Theory of finite groups. Applications in physics. Symmetry groups of quantum mechanical systems. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Kociński, J. (1983). Theory of symmetry changes at continuous phase transitions. Warsaw: PWN – Polish Scientific Publishers; Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kociński, J. (1990). Commensurate and incommensurate phase transitions. Warsaw: PWN – Polish Scientific Publishers; Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kopský, V. (1979a). Tensorial covariants of the 32 crystal point groups. Acta Cryst. A35, 83–95.
Kopský, V. (1979d). Representation generating theorem and interaction of improper quantities with order parameter. J. Phys. A. Math. Gen. 12, L291–L294.
Kopský, V. (2000). The change of tensor properties at ferroic phase transitions. Ferroelectrics, 237, 127–134.
Kopský, V. (2001). Tensor parameters of ferroic phase transitions. I. Theory and tables. Phase Transit. 73, No. 1–2, 1–422.
Landau, L. D. & Lifshitz, E. M. (1969). Course in theoretical physics, Vol. 5, Statistical physics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Lyubarskii, G. Ya. (1960). The application of group theory in physics. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Shuvalov, L. A. (1988). Editor. Modern crystallography IV. Physical properties of crystals. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Sirotin, Yu. I. & Shaskolskaya, M. P. (1982). Fundamentals of crystal physics. Moscow: Mir Publishers.
Tolédano, J.-C. & Tolédano, P. (1987). The Landau theory of phase transitions. Singapore: World Scientific.
Tolédano, P. & Dmitriev, V. (1996). Reconstructive phase transitions. Singapore: World Scientific.
Wadhawan, V. K. (2000) Introduction to ferroic materials. Australia: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.

References: V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V. 
 V.