Source: http://www.periodicos.letras.ufmg.br/index.php/relin/article/view/11304
Timestamp: 2019-04-25 22:34:00+00:00

Document:
Abstract: In this paper, we present a behavioral study aimed at investigating whether inanimate grammatical gender transparent nouns (feminine nouns ending in -a and masculine nouns ending in -o) and inanimate grammatical gender opaque nouns (other endings) in Brazilian Portuguese are processed by the same or by distinct cognitive mechanisms. To this purpose, 19 subjects participated in a grammatical gender agreement task in two conditions: between a determiner (definite article) and a noun (condition 1), and a noun and an adjective (condition 2). Factors such as frequency of the nouns and adjectives (high vs. low) as well as their phonological form (gender transparent vs. gender opaque) were manipulated. Results show that, in both conditions, frequency is a strong predictor of faster reaction times, suggesting that gender transparent and gender opaque forms can be stored in memory. This pattern holds for both conditions. We interpret this finding as evidence for the single-mechanism view of language processing.
Keywords: grammatical gender; Brazilian Portuguese.
Resumo: Este artigo apresenta um estudo comportamental que teve como objetivo investigar se substantivos inanimados do português do Brasil, transparentes quanto ao seu gênero gramatical (substantivos femininos terminados em -a e masculinos terminados em -o) e opacos (outras terminações) são ou não processados por mecanismos cognitivos distintos. Para tanto, uma tarefa de concordância de gênero foi executada por 19 sujeitos em duas condições: entre um artigo definido e um substantivo (condição 1) e entre um substantivo e um adjetivo (condição 2). Fatores como a frequência dos substantivos e adjetivos (alta vs. baixa) e forma fonológica (transparente vs. opaca) foram manipulados. Os resultados mostram que, em ambas as condições, a frequência é um forte preditor de respostas mais rápidas, sugerindo que tanto formas transparentes quanto formas opacas podem ser armazenadas na memória. Este padrão foi encontrado em ambas as condições. Estes resultados foram interpretados como evidência para a visão unitária de processamento da linguagem.
Palavras-chave: gênero gramatical; português do Brasil.
ALEGRE, M.; GORDON, P. Frequency Effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, Elsevier, v. 40, p. 41-61, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2607.
BAAYENS, H.; DIJKSTRA, T.; SCHREUDER, R. Singulars and Plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual route model. Journal of Memory and Language, Elsevier, v. 37, p. 94-117, 1997. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2509.
BAAYEN, R. H.; DAVIDSON, D. J; BATES, D. M. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, Elsevier, v. 59, p. 390-412, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005.
BAAYEN, H. R., TWEEDIE, F. J., SCHREUDER, R. The subjects as a simple random effect fallacy: Subject variability and morphological family effects in the mental lexicon, Brain and Language, v. 81, p. 55-65, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2506.
BARR, D.J.; LEVY, R.; SCHEEPERS, C.; TILY, H. J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, Elsevier, v. 68, p. 255-278, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001.
BATES, E.; DEVESCOVI, A.; PIZZAMIGLIO, L.; D’AMICO, S.; HERNADEZ, A. Gender and lexical access in Italian. Perception & Psychophysics, ResearchGate, v. 57, p. 847-862, 1995.
BOWDEN, H. W. Proficiency and second-language neurocognition: a study of Spanish as a first and second language. 2007. 241f. Tese (Doutorado) – Georgetown University, Washington D.C., 2007.
BYBEE, J. L. Morphology: a study of the relation between meaning and form. Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 1985. https://doi.org/10.1075/tsl.9.
BYBEE, J. L. Regular Morphology and the Lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, Taylor & Francis Online, v. 10, p. 425-455, 1995.
CAFFARRA, S., SYIANOVA-CHANTURIA, A., PESCIARELLI, F., VESPIGNANI, F., CACCIARI, C. Is the noun ending a cue to grammatical gender processing? An ERP study on sentences in Italian. Psychophysiology, Wiley Online Library, v. 52, n. 8, p. 1019-1030, 2015.
CLAHSEN, H.; ROTHWEILER, M.; WOEST, A. Regular and irregular in the acquisition of German noun plurals. Cognition, Elsevier, v. 45, p. 225-255, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90018-D.
CLAHSEN, H.; EISENBEISS, S.; SONNENSTUHL, I. Morphological strutucture and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics, De Gruyter, v. 23, p. 201-249, 1997.
CORBETT, G. Gender. Nova York: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
DESROCHERS, A.; PAIVIO, A.; DESROCHERS, S. L’effet de la frequence d’usage des noms inanimes et de la valeur predictive de leur terminaison sur 1’identification du genre gramatical. Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, Société Canadienne de Psychologie, v. 43, p. 62-73, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084253.
FLEISCHHAUER, E.; CLAHSEN, H. Generating Inflected Word Forms in Real Time: Evaluating the Role of Age, Frequency, and Working Memory. In: ANNUAL BOSTON UNIVERSITY CONFERENCE ON LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT, 36th., Somerville, 2012. Proceedings… Somerville: Cascadilla Press, 2012.
GOLLAN, T.; FROST, R. Two routes to gramatical gender: Evidence from Hebrew. Journal of Psycolinguistic Research, Springer Lind, v. 30, n. 6, p. 627-651, 2001.
GRUBBS, F. Procedures for Detecting Outlying Observations in Samples. Technometrics, Taylor & Francis Online, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1-21, 1969.
HERNANDEZ, A. E.; HOFMANN, J.; KOTZ, S. A. Age of acquisition modulates neural activity for both regular and irregular syntactic functions. NeuroImage, Elsevier, v. 36, p. 912-923, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.02.055.
HERNANDEZ A. E.; KORTZ A. S.; HOFMANN J.; VALENTIN V. V., DAPRETTO M.; BOOKHEIMER S. The neural correlates of grammatical gender decisions in Spanish. Neuroreport, LWW Journals, v. 15, n. 5, p. 863-866, 2004.
HOHFELD, A. Accessing gramatical gender in german: the impact of gender-marking regularities. Applied Psycholinguistics, Cambridge University Press, v. 27, p. 127-142, 2006.
JACKENDOFF, R. What’s in the lexicon?. In: NOOTEBOOM, S.; WEERMAN, F.; WIJNEN, F. (Org.). Storage and Computation in the Language Faculty. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. p. 61-92. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0355-1_2.
LAINE, M.; VIANIO, S.; HYÖDNÄ, J. Lexical access routes to nouns in a morphologically rich language. Journal of Memory & Language, Elsevier, v.40, p.109-135, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2615.
MACWHINNEY, B. The competition model: the input, the context, and the brain. In: ROBINSON, P. (Org.). Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. p. 69-90. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524780.005.
MARCUS, G. F.; BRINKMANN, U.; CLAHSEN, H.; WIESE, R.; PINKER, S. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology, Elsevier, n. 29, p. 189-256, 1995.
MORGAN-SHORT, K.; SANZ, C.; STEINHAUER, K.; ULLMAN, M.T; second language acquisition of gender agreement in explicit and implicit training conditions: an event-related potential study. Language Learning, Wiley Online Library, v. 60, 1, 154-193, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00554.x.
NAME, M. C. L. Habilidades perceptuais e lingüísticas no processo de aquisição do sistema de gênero no português. Ph.D. Dissertation. Rio de Janeiro: Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, 2002.
NEWMAN, A. J.; ULLMAN, M. T.; PANCHEVA, R.; WALIGURA, D. L.; NEVILLE, H. J. An ERP study of regular and irregular English past tense inflection. NeuroImage, Elsevier, v. 34, p. 435-445, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.007.
PADOVANNI, R.; CALANDRA-BUONAURA, G.; CACCIARI, C.; BENUZZI, F.; NICHELLI, P. Gramatical gender in the brain: Evidence from an fMRI study on Italian. Brain Research Bulletin, Elsevier, v. 65, p. 301-308, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2004.11.025.
PINKER, S. Rules of Language. Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, v. 253, p. 530-535, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1857983.
PINKER, S. Words and Rules. Lingua, Elsevier, v. 106, p.219-242, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0024-3841(98)00035-7.
PINKER, Steven. Words and rules: the ingredients of Language. Londres: Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1999.
PRADO, E.; ULLMAN, M. T. Can imageability help us draw the line between storage and composition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Language, Memory and Cognition, v. 35, n.4, p.849-866, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015286.
PRASADA, S.; PINKER, S. Generalizations of regular and irregular morphology. Language and Cognitive Processes, Taylor & Francis Online, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1-56, 1993.
RASTLE, K.; DAVIS, M. Morphological decomposition based on the analysis of orthography. Language and Cognitive Processes, Taylor & Francis Online, v. 23, p. 942-971, 2008.
R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-9000051-07-0, URL: http://www-R-project.org, 2008.
TAFT, M.; MEUNIER, F. Lexical representation of gender: A quasiregular domain. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Springer Link, v. 27, n. 1, p. 23-45, 1998.
TUCKER, G. R.; LAMBERT, W. E.; RIGAULT, A. A.; SEGALOWITZ, N. A psychological investigation of French speaker’s skill with gramatical gender. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, ResearchGate, v. 7, p. 312-316, 1968.
ULLMAN, M.T. Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular past-tense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighbourhood effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, Taylor & Francis Online, v. 1, n. 14, p. 47-67, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909699386374.
ULLMAN, M.T. The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, Springer Link, v. 30, n. 1, p. 37-69, 2001.
ULLMAN, M.T. Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, Cognition, v. 92, n. 1-2, p. 231-270, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.008.
ULLMAN, M.T. A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: the declarative/procedural model. In: SANZ, C. (Org). Adult second language acquisition. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 2005. p. 141-178.
VAN DER LELY, H. K. J.; ULLMAN, M. T. Past tense morphology in specifically language impaired and normally developing children. Language and Cognitive Processes, Taylor & Francis Online, v. 16, n. 2/3, p. 177-217, 2001.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 V. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.