Source: http://kolarandassociates.com/decisions/
Timestamp: 2019-04-22 00:11:04+00:00

Document:
November 2017 – De La Cruz v. Surf City Nissan -Jury Trial – Defense Verdict – Customer sued dealership and various individual employees alleging that they falsely imprisoned her and caused her to suffer severe emotional distress as a result of a sales transaction that was never ultimately consummated. The customer claimed that as a result of the dealership’s conduct, she suffered a heart attack and was hospitalized for five days.The case was tried to a jury in front of Superior Court Judge James Crandall, Orange County Superior Court. The jury deliberated and returned with a defense verdict in favor of the dealership and the individually named employees.
February 2015 – Enriquez v. GL Huntington Beach, LLC dba Surf City Nissan -Binding Arbitration - Defense verdict for dealer – Plaintiff alleged the dealer failed to make certain disclosures at the time of sale. Plaintiff further alleged that the deal was negotiated primarily in Spanish and that a Spanish translation contract should have been provided. Lastly, Plaintiff alleged that the dealership forged her signature on various documents. DEFENSE VERDICT AND AWARD OF COSTS TO DEALER.
July 2014 - Nowparast Behyzad v. Motorcars West dba the Auto Gallery – Jury Trial – Defense Verdict – Plaintiff alleged dealership defrauded him in the sales transaction by failing to make certain disclosures about the vehicle’s history, regarding its warranty and status as a prior demo. Causes of action: Fraud, CLRA and B & P 17200. The jury returned a verdict in favor of The Auto Gallery.
May 2012 – Cano v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC/Gandasetiawan v. Domino’s Pizza, LLC – Jury Trial – Defense Verdict – Eight former General Managers claimed that Domino’s misclassified them as exempt employees. Plaintiffs claim that they did not spend more than half of their time performing managerial duties and asserted labor code claims for overtime and minimum wage, failed to provide rest and meal breaks, waiting time and itemized wage statement penalties. The juries in both cases returned a defense verdict in favor of Domino’s Pizza, LLC.
August 2010 – Dhar v. AutoWest Honda Fremont - Jury Trial – The jury awarded the Plaintiff only $5,000.00 instead of rescission – On February 4, 2006 Plaintiff, Ruchi Dhar purchased a new 2006 Honda Odyssey Touring model from Autowest Honda Fremont. Plaintiff alleges she specifically informed the dealership that she wanted a vehicle with 8 seats and was told an 8th seat could be added. Dealership denied any such representation. Plaintiff sued for rescission and punitive damages.

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.