Source: https://chestofbooks.com/real-estate/Law-Real-Estate-Brokers/Broker-Must-Be-Employed-Part-4.html
Timestamp: 2019-04-23 17:51:23+00:00

Document:
Where a party knows that the services were being offered by a broker who expected pay, the acceptance of the services by the principal implies an agreement for the employment.24 If the owner has so conducted himself that the broker, acting fairly, had the honest belief that a lawful request had been made to him by the owner to render services as a broker in the sale of the owner's real estate, and if the broker, acting on such request, rendered such services, then the law would imply a promise by the owner to pay to the broker what the services were reasonably worth.
24 Ballentine v. Boone, 130 Mo. App. 616 (1908).
25 Weinhouse v. Cronin, 68 Conn. 253 (1896).
26 Jones v. Moore, 30 Ky. Law Rep. 603 (1907).
27 Downing v. Buck, 135 Mich. 638 (1904).
28 Citing Glenn v. Garth, 133 N. Y. 18, 35.
29 Burnham v. Lawson, 118 App. Div. 391 (N. Y. 1907). 3o Maze v. Gordon, 96 Cal. 61 (1892).
³¹ Sterling v. De Laune, 105 S. W. 1169 (Tex. 1907).
32 Clark v. Hyatt, 118 N. Y. 567 (1889).
33 Clark v. Hyatt, 118 N. Y. 568, 569 (1889).

References: v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v. 
 v.