CELEX: 62015FA0034
Language: en
Date: 2015-12-16 00:00:00
Title: Case F-34/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 December 2015 — De Loecker v EEAS (Civil service — EEAS staff — Temporary staff — Psychological harassment — Articles 12a and 24b of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Rejection — Request to open an administrative investigation — Right to be heard — Infringement)

8.2.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 48/96
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 16 December 2015 — De Loecker v EEAS
   (Case F-34/15) (1)
   
   ((Civil service - EEAS staff - Temporary staff - Psychological harassment - Articles 12a and 24b of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Rejection - Request to open an administrative investigation - Right to be heard - Infringement))
   (2016/C 048/110)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Stéphane De Loecker (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application to annul the decision to reject the complaint of psychological harassment lodged by the applicant against the Chief Operating Officer of the EEAS.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of 14 April 2014 by which the European External Action Service rejected the request for assistance under Articles 12a and 24 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union made by Mr De Loecker;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the European External Action Service to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Mr De Loecker.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 178, 1/6/2015, p. 25.