CELEX: 62011TB0285
Language: en
Date: 2011-12-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-285/11: Order of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Gooré v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire — Withdrawal of the list of persons concerned — Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — Action manifestly unfounded)

18.2.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 49/24
            
         Order of the General Court of 15 December 2011 — Gooré v Council
   (Case T-285/11) (1)
   
   (Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire - Withdrawal of the list of persons concerned - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - Action manifestly unfounded)
   2012/C 49/44
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Charles Kader Gooré (Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire) (represented by: F. Meynot, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen, G. Étienne and M. Chavrier, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Firstly, annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire (OJ 2011 L 93, p. 10), as regards the applicant’s name and, secondly, an application for damages.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               There is no further need to adjudicate on the application for annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 330/2011 of 6 April 2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 560/2005 imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in Côte d’Ivoire.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The application for damages is dismissed.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Each party shall bear its own costs.
            
         
               4.
            
            
               There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.