CELEX: 62018TN0305
Language: en
Date: 2018-05-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-305/18: Action brought on 16 May 2018 — Klyuyev v Council

201806220471970572018/C 240/633052018TC24020180709EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180516545411Case T-305/18: Action brought on 16 May 2018 — Klyuyev v Council
 ---documentbreak--- C2402018EN5410120180516EN0063541541Action brought on 16 May 2018 — Klyuyev v Council
   (Case T-305/18)2018/C 240/63Language of the case: English
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Andriy Klyuyev (Donetsk, Ukraine) (represented by: B. Kennelly, QC, J. Pobjoy, Barrister, R Gherson and T. Garner, Solicitors)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should annul:
   
            —
         
         
            Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/333 of 5 March 2018 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2018 L 63, p. 48), and
         
      
            —
         
         
            Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2018/326 of 5 March 2018 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine (OJ 2018 L 63, p. 5),
         
      insofar as those measures apply to the applicant.
   
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
   
            1.
         
         
            First plea in law, alleging that the Council made errors of assessment in considering that the criterion for listing the applicant in Article 1(1) of the contested decision and Article 3(1) of the contested regulation is satisfied.
         
      
            2.
         
         
            Second plea in law, alleging that the violation of the applicant’s rights under Article 6, read with Articles 2 and 3, TEU, and Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union by the Council’s assumption that the Applicant’s treatment in Ukraine complied with fundamental human rights.
         
      
            3.
         
         
            Third plea in law, alleging that the Council violated the applicant’s rights of defence and the right to good administration and effective judicial protection.
         
      
            4.
         
         
            Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Council infringed, without justification or proportion, the applicant’s rights to property and reputation.