CELEX: 62008TN0389
Language: en
Date: 2008-09-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-389/08: Action brought on 16 September 2008 — Lemans v OHIM — Turner (ICON)

22.11.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 301/50
            
         Action brought on 16 September 2008 — Lemans v OHIM — Turner (ICON)
   (Case T-389/08)
   (2008/C 301/84)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Lemans Corporation (Janesville, United States) (represented by: M. Cover, Solicitor)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Stephen Turner (Luddington, United Kingdom)
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 3 July 2008 in case R 778/2007-2;
            
         
               —
            
            
               A declaration that the opposition be dismissed and that Community trade mark concerned may proceed to registration; and
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs, including the appeals before the Board of Appeal and the Court of First Instance.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   
      Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ICON’ for goods and services in classes 9, 18 and 25 — application No 2 197 440
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited: The national word mark ‘IKON’ for goods in class 9 — UK trade mark registration No 2 243 676
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the application in its entirety
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: The Board of Appeal erred in its finding that the other party to the proceedings before it had locus standi to file the opposition.