CELEX: C2003/171/42
Language: en
Date: 2003-07-19 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 March 2003 in Case T-163/02: Montan Gesellschaft Voss mbH Stahlhandel and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Action for annulment — No need to give a decision — Action for damages — Admissibility — Plea of inadmissibility joined to the application on the substance)

19.7.2003               EN                          Official Journal of the European Union                                              C 171/25
performance for 2001 — the Court of First Instance (Fifth                          ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
Chamber), composed of R. García-Valdecasas, President,
P. Lindh and J.D. Cooke, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator,                                        of 8 April 2003
for the Registrar; has given a judgment on 20 May 2003 in
which it:
                                                                            in Case T-91/02: Klausner Nordic Timber GmbH & Co.
                                                                                 KG v Commission of the European Communities ( 1)
1.    Dismisses the application;
                                                                            (Action for annulment — Action now devoid of purpose —
2.    Orders the parties to bear their own costs.                                               No need to give a decision)
                                                                                                       (2003/C 171/41)
( 1) OJ C 202, 24. 8. 2002.
                                                                                               (Language of the case: German)
                                                                            In Case T-91/02: Klausner Nordic Timber GmbH & Co. KG,
                                                                            established in Wismar (Germany), represented by D. Reich,
                                                                            lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
                                                                            the Commission of the European Communities (Agents:
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                 V. Kreuschitz and V. Di Bucci) — application for the annulment
                                                                            of Commission Decision 2002/468/EC, of 15 January 2002
                          of 3 April 2003                                   on the State aid implemented by Germany for Klausner Nordic
                                                                            Timber GmbH & Co. KG, Wismar, Mecklenburg-Western
                                                                            Pomerania (OJ 2002 L 165, p. 15) — the Court of First
in Case T-18/02, Anita Jannice Österholm v Commission                       Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition), composed
               of the European Communities ( 1)                             of V. Tiili, President, J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi, A. W. H. Meij and
                                                                            M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 8 April
                                                                            2003, the operative part of which is as follows:
       (Official — Action for damages — Inadmissible)
                                                                            1.    There is no need to give a decision on the present action.
                          (2003/C 171/40)
                                                                            2.    The Commission shall pay the costs, including those relating to
                                                                                  the procedure for interim relief.
                    (Language of the case: French)
                                                                            (1 ) OJ 156 of 29.6.02.
In Case T-18/02, Anita Jannice Österholm, residing in Stockh-
olm, represented by J. R. Iturriagagoitia and K. Devolvé,
lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties (Agent: J. Currall and V. Joris) — application for compen-
sation for the material and non-material damage caused, inter                      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
alia, by the length of time taken to process a claim submitted
by the applicant — the Court of First Instance (Second                                               of 27 March 2003
Chamber), composed of N. J. Forwood, President, J. Pirrung
and W. H. Meij, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
                                                                            in Case T-163/02: Montan Gesellschaft Voss mbH
3 April 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:
                                                                            Stahlhandel and Others v Commission of the European
                                                                                                       Communities ( 1)
1.    There is no longer any need to give a decision on the action for
      annulment.                                                            (Action for annulment — No need to give a decision —
                                                                            Action for damages — Admissibility — Plea of inadmissi-
2.    The action for damages is dismissed as inadmissible.                          bility joined to the application on the substance)
3.    The Commission shall pay half of the applicant’s costs as well                                   (2003/C 171/42)
      as its own costs. The applicant shall bear the other half of her
      own costs.                                                                               (Language of the case: German)
( 1) OJ C 109 of 4.5.02.
                                                                            In Case T-163/02: Montan Gesellschaft Voss mbH Stahlhandel,
                                                                            established in Planneg (Germany), Jepsen Stahl GmbH, estab-
                                                                            lished in Nittendorf (Germany), LNS — Lothar Niemeyer
 ---pagebreak--- C 171/26                 EN                           Official Journal of the European Union                                              19.7.2003
Stahlhandel GmbH & Co. KG, established in Essen (Germany),                    repealing Commission Directive 91/357/EEC (OJ 2002 L 63,
and Metal Traders Stahlhandel GmbH, established in Düssel-                    p. 23) and a claim for compensation for the damage allegedly
dorf (Germany) represented by K. Friedrich, lawyer, with an                   suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber),
address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of                  composed of V. Tiili, President of the Chamber, P. Mengozzi
the European Communities (Agents: J. Forman and R. Raith) —                   and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
application, first, for the annulment of Commission Regulation                21 March 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:
(EC) No 560/2002 of 27 March 2002 imposing provisional
safeguard measures against imports of certain steel products
(OJ 2002 L 85, p. 1) and, second, a claim for damages —                       1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible so far as it concerns
the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of                            the annulment of Directive 2002/2/EC of the European
B. Vesterdorf, President R.M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,                             Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 27 March 2003,                         Council Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound
the operative part of which is as follows:                                          feedingstuffs and repealing Commission Directive 91/357/
                                                                                    EEC.
1.     There is no need to give a decision on the claim for annulment.
                                                                              2.    The requests submitted by the defendants that the action, in so
2.     The application for a ruling on the admissibility of the claim               far as it seeks compensation for the damage allegedly suffered,
       for damages is joined to the application on the substance.                   should be held inadmissible, are reserved for final judgment.
3.     The costs are reserved.                                                3.    Costs are reserved.
( 1) OJ C 191 of 10.8.02.
                                                                              (1 ) OJ 2002 C 180.
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                          of 21 March 2003
                                                                                     ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
in Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge v European
      Parliament and Council of the European Union ( 1)                                                 of 31 March 2003
(Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons —
Measures of direct and individual concern to them —                           in Case T-226/02: André Hecq v Commission of the
Directive 2002/2/EC — Inadmissibility — Claim for dam-                                            European Communities (1)
                                  ages)
                                                                              (Officials — Action for annulment — Act adversely affect-
                           (2003/C 171/43)                                                     ing an official — Inadmissibility)
                     (Language of the case: French)
                                                                                                         (2003/C 171/44)
                                                                                                   (Language of the case: French)
In Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge, established in
Bricquebec (France), represented by D. Waelbroeck and
D. Brinckman, lawyers, against European Parliament (Agents:
C. Pennera and Mme E. Waldherr) and Council of the European
Union (Agents: I. Diez Parra and F. P. Ruggeri Laderchi),
supported by Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-                         In Case T-226/02: André Hecq, an official of the Commission
D. Plessing nad M. Lumma) and Commission of the European                      of the European Communities, residing in Mondercange
Communities (Agent: A. Bordes) — application for the annul-                   (Luxembourg), represented by L. Vogel and D. Amatulli,
ment of Directive 2002/2/EC of the European Parliament and                    lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communi-
of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending Council Directive                  ties (Agent: M. Currall) — application for the annulment of the
79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs and                   Commission decision of 15 June 2001 approving the