CELEX: 62008FN0048
Language: en
Date: 2008-04-27 00:00:00
Title: Case F-48/08: Action brought on 27 April 2008 — Ortega Serrano v Commission

5.7.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 171/52
            
         Action brought on 27 April 2008 — Ortega Serrano v Commission
   (Case F-48/08)
   (2008/C 171/105)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Antonio Ortega Serrano (Cádiz, Spain) (represented by: A. Ortega Serrano, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
   Subject-matter and description of the proceedings
   Annulment of the decision of the selection board in competition EPSO/AD/26/05 not to include the applicant's name on the list of successful candidates.
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision not to include the applicant's name in the reserve list of competition EPSO/AD/26/05 or to afford him the opportunity of taking the oral test again;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the Commission to set a new date for the oral test;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the Commission to state the reasons for its decision EPSO/900/R;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Grant the applicant access to the records of the oral test;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Grant the applicant access to all the documents which form part of his personal file;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Declare that the applicant, who is a lawyer practising before the Spanish courts, may represent himself;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the examination of the personal files of all the candidates whose names are included in the list of successful candidates in order to verify that all of them have a level of education which corresponds to completed university studies of at least three years attested by a diploma in law and that they submitted their applications within the time limits and in the correct form;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Declare the documents presented as annexes in French and English to be admissible;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs.