CELEX: C2007/096/64
Language: en
Date: 2007-04-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-369/00: Judgment of the Tribunal of First Instance of 29 March 2007 — Département du Loiret v Commission (State aid — Land sale price — Decision ordering the recovery of aid incompatible with the common market — Present-day value of the aid — Compound interest — Statement of reasons)

28.4.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 96/30
            
         Judgment of the Tribunal of First Instance of 29 March 2007 — Département du Loiret v Commission
   (Case T-369/00) (1)
   
   (State aid - Land sale price - Decision ordering the recovery of aid incompatible with the common market - Present-day value of the aid - Compound interest - Statement of reasons)
   (2007/C 96/64)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Département du Loiret (France) (represented by: A. Carnelutti, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Rozet and J. Flett, Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the applicant: Scott SA (Saint-Cloud (France), (represented by: Sir Jeremy Lever QC, J. Gardner and G. Peretz, Barristers and R. Griffith and M. Papadakis, Solicitors)
   Re:
   Partial annulument of Commission Decision 2002/14/EC of 12 July 2000 on the State aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA/Kimberly-Clark (OJ 2002 L 12, p. 1).
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls Commission Decision 2002/14/EC of 12 July 2000 on the State aid granted by France to Scott Paper SA/Kimberly-Clark in so far as it concerns the aid granted in the form of a preferential price for the property referred to in Article 1;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant and by Scott SA.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 61, 24.2.2001.