CELEX: C2005/193/39
Language: en
Date: 2005-08-06 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 2 June 2005 in Case T-177/03 Andreas Strohm v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Refusal of promotion to Grade A4 — Consideration of comparative merits — Duty to state grounds — Additional statement of grounds — Action for annulment and compensation — Admissibility)

6.8.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 193/24
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 2 June 2005
   in Case T-177/03 Andreas Strohm v Commission of the European Communities (1)
   
   (Officials - Refusal of promotion to Grade A4 - Consideration of comparative merits - Duty to state grounds - Additional statement of grounds - Action for annulment and compensation - Admissibility)
   (2005/C 193/39)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case T-177/03: Andreas Strohm, an official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by C. Illig, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: C. Berardis-Kayser, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the Commission's decision dated 14 August 2002, not to promote the applicant to Grade A4 in the 2002 procedure, and for compensation — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; C. Kristensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 2 June 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the Commission's decision, dated 14 August 2002, not to promote the applicant to Grade A4 in the 2002 promotion procedure;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Dismisses the application as inadmissible in so far as it seeks compensation for the applicant;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the defendant to bear all the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 200 of 20.8.2003.