CELEX: C2005/093/56
Language: en
Date: 2005-04-16 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 February 2005 in Case T-354/03 Gemma Reggimenti v European Parliament (Officials — Reimbursement of dependent child's travel expenses — Division if two married officials divorce)

16.4.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 93/28
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 16 February 2005
   in Case T-354/03 Gemma Reggimenti v European Parliament (1)
   
   (Officials - Reimbursement of dependent child's travel expenses - Division if two married officials divorce)
   (2005/C 93/56)
   Language of the case: French
   In Case T-354/03: Gemma Reggimenti, an official of the European Parliament, residing in Woluwé-Saint-Lambert (Belgium), represented by C. Junion, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against the European Parliament (Agents: L.G. Knudsen and A. Bencomo Weber, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — action for annulment of the Parliament's decision of 27 May 2003, confirmed by letter of 17 July 2003, by which it decided, under Article 8 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations to divide, from 2002, the reimbursement of travelling expenses for the applicant's daughter between the two divorced officials — the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President, M. Jaeger and O. Czúcz, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 16 February 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Declares the action inadmissible as regards the fixed-rate travel expenses prior to 2002.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Declares the action inadmissible also in so far as it contains an application for an injunction.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Dismisses the reminder of the claims in the application as unfounded.
            
         
               4.
            
            
               Orders each party to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 7 of 10.1.2004.