CELEX: 62020TA0021
Language: en
Date: 2020-11-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-21/20: Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Staszewski (K7) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark K7 — Earlier EU word mark k7 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

18.1.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 19/48
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 18 November 2020 — LG Electronics v EUIPO — Staszewski (K7)
      (Case T-21/20) (1)
      
      (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark K7 - Earlier EU word mark k7 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
      (2021/C 19/50)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: R. Schiffer, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and V. Ruzek, acting as Agents)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Miłosz Staszewski (Wrocław, Poland) (represented by: E. Gryc Zerych, lawyer)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 October 2019 (Case R 401/2019 1), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Staszewski and LG Electronics.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders LG Electronics, Inc., to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 68, 2.3.2020.