CELEX: 62014TN0322
Language: en
Date: 2014-05-07 00:00:00
Title: Case T-322/14: Action brought on 7 May 2014  — mobile.international v OHIM — Rezon (mobile.de)

21.7.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 235/26
            
         Action brought on 7 May 2014 — mobile.international v OHIM — Rezon (mobile.de)
   (Case T-322/14)
   2014/C 235/36
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: mobile.international GmbH (Kleinmachnow, Germany) (represented by: T. Lührig, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rezon OOD (Sofia, Bulgaria)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 13 February 2014 in Case R 951/2013-1;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the figurative mark including the word elements ‘mobile.de’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35, 38 and 42 — Community trade mark No 8 8 38  609
   
      Proprietor of the Community trade mark: the applicant
   
      Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Rezon OOD
   
      Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: national figurative mark including the word elements ‘mobile’ for services in Classes 35, 39 and 42
   
      Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the application for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal upheld and the case is referred back to the Cancellation Division
   
      Pleas in law:
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 57 (2) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 22(2) of Regulation No 2868/95;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 57(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 22(3) and (4) of Regulation No 2868/95;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 78(1)(f) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of the rules on abuse of law in conjunction with Article 56(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 and Article 54(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009