CELEX: C2005/330/44
Language: en
Date: 2005-12-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-60/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of  18 October 2005  — Regione Siciliana v Commission (Action for annulment — Admissibility — Fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC — Natural or legal persons — Act of direct concern to them — European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) — Commission's decision cancelling and requiring repayment of financial assistance — Article 24 of Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 — Manifest error of assessment)

24.12.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 330/18
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 October 2005 — Regione Siciliana v Commission
   (Case T-60/03) (1)
   
   (Action for annulment - Admissibility - Fourth paragraph of Article 230 EC - Natural or legal persons - Act of direct concern to them - European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) - Commission's decision cancelling and requiring repayment of financial assistance - Article 24 of Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 - Manifest error of assessment)
   (2005/C 330/44)
   Language of the case: Italian
   Parties
   
      Applicant(s): Regione Siciliana (originally represented by G. Aiello, and subsequently by A. Cingolo, avvocati dello Stato)
   
      Defendant(s): Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. de March and L. Flynn, acting as Agents)
   Application for
   annulment of Commission decision C (2002) 4905 of 11 December 2002 relating to the cancellation of the aid granted to the Italian Republic by Commission Decision C (87) 2090 026 of 17 December 1987 concerning the provision of assistance by the European Regional Development Fund as infrastructure investment, for a sum no less than 15 million, in Italy (region: Sicily), and to the recovery of the advance on that assistance made by the Commission
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1)
            
            
               Dismisses the objection of inadmissibility;
            
         
               2)
            
            
               Dismisses the action as unfounded;
            
         
               3)
            
            
               Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and half of the costs incurred by the Commission, and orders the Commission to bear half its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 101, 26.4.2003.