CELEX: 62015TA0619
Language: en
Date: 2017-07-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-619/15: Judgment of the General Court of 20 July 2017 — Badica and Kardiam v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in the Central African Republic — Freezing of funds — Initial decision to list — List of persons and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources — Inclusion of the applicants’ names — Implementation of a UN resolution — Obligation to state reasons — Rights of defence — Presumption of innocence — Manifest error of assessment)

28.8.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 283/34
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 20 July 2017 — Badica and Kardiam v Council
   (Case T-619/15) (1)
   
   ((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures adopted against certain persons and entities in view of the situation in the Central African Republic - Freezing of funds - Initial decision to list - List of persons and entities covered by the freezing of funds and economic resources - Inclusion of the applicants’ names - Implementation of a UN resolution - Obligation to state reasons - Rights of defence - Presumption of innocence - Manifest error of assessment))
   (2017/C 283/51)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Bureau d’achat de diamant Centrafrique (Badica) (Bangui, Central African Republic) and Kardiam (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: D. Luff and L. Defalque, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: B. Driessen and P. Mahnič Bruni, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1485 of 2 September 2015 implementing Article 17(1) of Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic (OJ 2015 L 229, p. 1).
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The General Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Bureau d’achat de diamant Centrafrique (Badica) and Kardiam to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 27, 25.1.2016.