CELEX: 62010TN0163
Language: en
Date: 2010-04-07 00:00:00
Title: Case T-163/10: Action brought on 7 April 2010 — Entegris v OHIM — Optimize Technologies (OPTIMIZE TECHNOLOGIES)

19.6.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 161/46
            
         
      Action brought on 7 April 2010 — Entegris v OHIM — Optimize Technologies (OPTIMIZE TECHNOLOGIES)
      (Case T-163/10)
      (2010/C 161/73)
      Language in which the application was lodged: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Entegris, Inc. (Billerica, United States) (represented by: T. Ludbrook, Barrister and M. Rosser, Solicitor)
      
         Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Optimize Technologies, Inc. (Oregon City, United States)
      
         Form of order sought
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Uphold the appeal;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 18 January 2010 in case R 802/2009-2;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Reject the Community trade mark application in question; and
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Order the defendant to bear the costs, including those related to the appeal and opposition proceedings.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      
         Applicant for the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
      
         Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘OPTIMIZE TECHNOLOGIES’, for goods in class 9.
      
         Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
      
         Mark or sign cited: Community trade mark registration of the word mark “OPTIMIZER”, for goods in classes 1, 9 and 11.
      
         Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition
      
         Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the opposition in its entirety
      
         Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 as the Board of Appeal failed to apply the said legal provision in accordance with the relevant case law, thereby wrongly finding that there was no likelihood of confusion between the trade marks concerned.