CELEX: 62015CA0147
Language: en
Date: 2016-07-28 00:00:00
Title: Case C-147/15: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Città Metropolitana di Bari, formerly Provincia di Bari v Edilizia Mastrodonato Srl (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the environment — Waste management — Directive 2006/21/EC — Article 10(2) — Backfilling of excavation voids using waste other than extractive waste — Landfill or recovery of such waste)

26.9.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 350/7
            
         Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 28 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Città Metropolitana di Bari, formerly Provincia di Bari v Edilizia Mastrodonato Srl
   (Case C-147/15) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the environment - Waste management - Directive 2006/21/EC - Article 10(2) - Backfilling of excavation voids using waste other than extractive waste - Landfill or recovery of such waste))
   (2016/C 350/08)
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Referring court
   
   Consiglio di Stato
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Città Metropolitana di Bari, formerly Provincia di Bari
   
      Defendant: Edilizia Mastrodonato Srl
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Article 10(2) of Directive 2006/21/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the management of waste from extractive industries and amending Directive 2004/35/EC must be interpreted as not having the effect of making an operation entailing the backfilling of a quarry using waste other than extractive waste subject to the requirements of Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste, where that operation amounts to a recovery of waste, which is a matter to be determined by the national court.
   
      (1)  OJ C 205, 22.6.2015.