CELEX: 62006TA0145
Language: en
Date: 2009-02-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-145/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 February 2009 — Omya v Commission (Competition — Concentrations — Request for information — Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 — Need for the information requested — Proportionality — Reasonable time — Misuse of powers — Breach of the principle of legitimate expectation)

21.3.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 69/35
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 February 2009 — Omya v Commission
   (Case T-145/06) (1)
   
   (Competition - Concentrations - Request for information - Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Need for the information requested - Proportionality - Reasonable time - Misuse of powers - Breach of the principle of legitimate expectation)
   (2009/C 69/81)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Omya AG (Oftringen, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Ahlborn, C. Berg, Solicitors, C. Pinto Correia, lawyer, and J. Flynn QC)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented initially by V. Di Bucci, X. Lewis, R. Sauer, A. Whelan and F. Amato, and subsequently by V. Di Bucci, X Lewis, R. Sauer and A. Whelan, Agents)
   Re:
   Application for the annulment of the Commission's decision of 8 March 2006 adopted pursuant to Article 11(3) of Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (OJ 2004 L 24, p. 1), and requesting the correction of the information communicated in the context of the examination of (Case COMP/M. 3796 Omya v J.M. Huber PCC)
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Omya AG to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006.