CELEX: 62010TA0169
Language: en
Date: 2012-05-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-169/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Grupo Osborne v OHIM — Industria Licorera Quezalteca (TORO XL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark TORO XL — Early Community figurative mark XL — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 — No likelihood of confusion)

7.7.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 200/12
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2012 — Grupo Osborne v OHIM — Industria Licorera Quezalteca (TORO XL)
   (Case T-169/10) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark TORO XL - Early Community figurative mark XL - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 - No likelihood of confusion)
   2012/C 200/22
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Grupo Osborne, SA (El Puerto de Santa Maria, Spain) (represented by: J.M. Iglesias Monravá, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: J. Crespo Carillo, agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Industria Licorera Quezalteca, SA (Quetzal Tenango, Guatemala)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2010 (Case R 223/2009-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Industria Licorera Quezalteca, SA and Grupo Osborne, SA.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 January 2010 (Case R 223/2009-2).
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.