CELEX: 62016TN0075
Language: en
Date: 2016-02-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-75/16 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-128/11 De Nicola v EIB

4.4.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 118/39
            
         Appeal brought on 18 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-128/11 De Nicola v EIB
   (Case T-75/16 P)
   (2016/C 118/45)
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Carlo de Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank
   
      Form of order sought by the appellant
   
   The appellant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Uphold the present appeal and, entirely reversing the order under appeal, annul points 1 and 2 of the operative part, together with paragraphs 1, 7 to 25, 51 to 52, 63 to 76, 80, 84, 87 to 88, 97 to 98 and 101 to 115 of the order itself;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Consequently, annul all the contested acts and order the EIB to compensate Dr De Nicola for the damage suffered, as requested in the application initiating proceedings or, in the alternative, refer the case to another Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal in order that it may, in a different formation, give a fresh decision on the annulled paragraphs;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the European Investment Bank to pay the costs.
            
         
      Grounds of appeal and main arguments
   
   The present appeal is brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal (single Judge) of 18 December 2015 in De Nicola v European Investment Bank (F-128/11).
   The grounds of appeal and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-55/16 P De Nicola v European Investment Bank.
   The appellant emphasises, in particular, that the heads of claim seeking annulment of the messages of 4 July and 12 August 2011 and annulment of the decision of 6 September 2011 rejecting the request to launch a conciliation procedure are admissible.