CELEX: 62015TA0144
Language: en
Date: 2016-04-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-144/15: Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2016 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Theralab (VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA — Earlier EU word mark IDEALINA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

13.6.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 211/51
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2016 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Theralab (VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA)
      (Case T-144/15) (1)
      
      ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA - Earlier EU word mark IDEALINA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
      (2016/C 211/64)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: L’Oréal, SA (Paris, France) (represented by: J. Sena Mioludo, avocat)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Theralab — Produtos Farmacêuticos e Nutracêuticos, Lda (Viseu, Portugal)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 January 2015 (Case R 1097/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Theralab — Produtos Farmacêuticos e Nutracêuticos and L’Oréal.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders L’Oréal, SA, to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 171, 26.5.2015.