CELEX: 62012FB0146
Language: en
Date: 2016-08-02 00:00:00
Title: Case F-146/12: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 August 2016 –Mommer v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Pensions — Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes — Proposal to add years of pensionable service — Act not having an adverse effect — Action manifestly inadmissible)

3.10.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 364/43
            
         
      Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 August 2016 –Mommer v Commission
      (Case F-146/12) (1)
      
      ((Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes - Proposal to add years of pensionable service - Act not having an adverse effect - Action manifestly inadmissible))
      (2016/C 364/54)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Anne Mommer (Brussels, Belgium) (represented initially by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyers, and subsequently by: S. Orlandi, J.-N. Louis and D. de Abreu Caldas, lawyers, and finally by: S. Orlandi, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: D. Martin and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and finally by: G. Gattinara, acting as Agent)
      
         Re:
      
      Application for annulment of the decision concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights to the European Union pension scheme, which decision applies the new GIPs relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations of Officials.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Each party shall bear its own costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013, p. 78.