CELEX: 62013TN0506
Language: en
Date: 2013-09-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-506/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)

30.11.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 352/17
            
         Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)
   (Case T-506/13)
   2013/C 352/32
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA (Suceava, Romania) (represented by: I. Burdusel, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Harun Adiguzel (Diosd, Hungary)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 July 2013 given in Case R 1309/2012-4;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs of present proceedings; and
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs incurred during the proceedings before the OHIM.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The word mark ‘URB’ for goods in Classes 6 and 7 — Community trade mark registration No 7 380 009
   
      Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Absolute grounds for invalidity under Article 52(1)(b) CTMR and relative grounds for invalidity under Article 8(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) CTMR
   
      Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the request for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 52(1)(b), 53(1)(a) and 72 CTMR.