CELEX: 62015TN0768
Language: en
Date: 2015-12-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-768/15: Action brought on 28 December 2015 — RP Technik v OHIM — Tecnomarmi (RP ROYAL PALLADIUM)

29.2.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 78/29
            
         Action brought on 28 December 2015 — RP Technik v OHIM — Tecnomarmi (RP ROYAL PALLADIUM)
   (Case T-768/15)
   (2016/C 078/40)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: RP Technik GmbH Profilsysteme (Bönen, Germany) (represented by: P. Henrichs, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tecnomarmi Snc (Treviso, Italy)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘RP ROYAL PALLADIUM’ — Community trade mark application No 11 358 496
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 October 2014 in Case R 2061/2014-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;
            
         
               —
            
            
               in the alternative, order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if the intervener is not a party to the proceedings.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.