CELEX: 62019CN0275
Language: en
Date: 2019-04-02 00:00:00
Title: Case C-275/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal) lodged on 2 April 2019 — Sportingbet PLC, Internet Opportunity Entertainment Ltd v Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa, Sporting Club de Braga, Sporting Club de Braga — Futebol, SAD

17.6.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 206/34
            
         
      Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal) lodged on 2 April 2019 — Sportingbet PLC, Internet Opportunity Entertainment Ltd v Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa, Sporting Club de Braga, Sporting Club de Braga — Futebol, SAD
      (Case C-275/19)
      (2019/C 206/39)
      Language of the case: Portuguese
      
         Referring court
      
      Supremo Tribunal de Justiça
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Appellants: Sportingbet PLC, Internet Opportunity Entertainment Ltd
      
         Respondents: Santa Casa da Misericórdia de Lisboa, Sporting Club de Braga, Sporting Club de Braga — Futebol, SAD
      
         Questions referred
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Given that the Portuguese State did not inform the European Commission of the technical regulations contained in Decree-Law No 442/89 of 2 December 1989, should those provisions ‒ more specifically Article 3 (using the wording shown) and Article 9 mentioned below ‒ be unenforceable, and can individuals rely on that lack of enforceability?
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Given that the Portuguese State did not inform the European Commission of the technical regulations contained in Decree-Law No 282/2003 of 8 November 2003, should those provisions ‒ more specifically Article 2 and Article 3 mentioned below ‒ be unenforceable as against service providers in Portugal?