CELEX: 62013CA0221
Language: en
Date: 2014-10-15 00:00:00
Title: Case C-221/13: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Trento — Italy) — Teresa Mascellani v Ministero della Giustizia (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 97/81/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Conversion of part-time employment relationship to full-time employment relationship without the worker’s consent)

22.12.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 462/6
            
         Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 October 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Trento — Italy) — Teresa Mascellani v Ministero della Giustizia
   (Case C-221/13) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 97/81/EC - Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Conversion of part-time employment relationship to full-time employment relationship without the worker’s consent))
   (2014/C 462/09)
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Referring court
   
   Tribunale ordinario di Trento
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Teresa Mascellani
   
      Defendant: Ministero della Giustizia
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded on 6 June 1997 which is annexed to Council Directive 1997/81/EC of 15 December 1997, concerning the Framework Agreement on part-time work concluded by UNICE, CEEP and the ETUC, in particular Clause 5.2 thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings, it does not preclude national legislation pursuant to which the employer may order the conversion of a part-time employment relationship into a full-time employment relationship without the consent of the worker concerned.
   
      (1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.