CELEX: C1995/101/01
Language: en
Date: 1995-04-22 00:00:00
Title: JUDGMENT OF THE COURT of 7 March 1995 in Case C-130/91 REV: ISAE/VP (Instituto Social de Apoio ao Emprego e à Valorização Profissional) and Interdata (Centro de Processamento de Dados Limidada) v. Commission of the European Communities (Application for revision - Manifest inadmissibility)

22. 4. 95          | EN                 Official Journal of the European Communities                                No C 101 /1
                                                                I
                                                         (Information)
                                            COURT OF JUSTICE
                                                      COURT OF JUSTICE
             JUDGMENT OF THE COURT                                 2, orders the applicants to pay the costs.
                      of 7 March 1995
in Case C-130/91 REV: ISAE/VP (Instituto Social de Apoio           (!) OJ No C 165 , 25 . 6 . 1991 .
ao Emprego e à Valorização Profissional) and Interdata                 OJ No C 47, 21 . 2 . 1992 .
( Centro de Processamento de Dados Limidada) v.
       Commission of the European Communities ( a )
   (Application for revision — Manifest inadmissibility)
                        ( 95/C 101/01 )
                                                                                JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
            (Language of the case: Portuguese)                                             (Fifth Chamber)
                                                                                          of 9 March 1995
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be       in Case C-345/93 (reference for a preliminary ruling from
        published in the European Court Reports)                   the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo): Fazenda Pública,
                                                                      Ministério Público v. Américo João Nunes Tadeu ( J )
In Case C-130/91 REV: ISAE/VP (Instituto Social de Apoio                                     ( 95/C 101/02 )
ao Emprego e à Valorização Profissional ), a company
incorporated under Portuguese law and established in                           (Language of the case: Portuguese)
Lisbon, and Interdata ( Centro de Processamento de Dados
Limidada ), a company incorporated under Portuguese law
and established in Lisbon ( avocat: Agostinho Amado                (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
Rodrigues ) v. Commission of the European Communities                      published in the European Court Reports)
(Agent: Ana Maria Alves Vieira ) — application for revision
of the order of the Court of Justice of 14 January 1992 in         In Case C-345/93 : reference to the Court under Article 177
Case C-130/91 ISAE/VP and Interdata v. Commission
                                                                   of the EEC Treaty from the Tax Section of the Supremo
[ 1992] ECR 1-69 , — the Court, composed of: G. C.                 Tribunal Administrative ( Supreme Administrative Court),
Rodriguez Iglesias, President, F. A. Schockweiler, P. J. G.        Portugal, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings
Kapteyn, C. Gulmann and P. Jann (Presidents of                     pending before that court between Fazenda Publica,
Chambers ), G. F. Mancini, C. N. Kakouris, J. C. Moitinho          Ministério Público and Américo Joâo Nunes Tadeu — on
de Almeida, J. L. Murray (Rapporteur), D. A. O. Edward,            the interpretation of Articles 9, 12 and 95 of the EC Treaty
J.-P. Puissochet, G. Hirsch and H. Ragnemalm, Judges; P.           — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: J. C. Moitinho
Léger, Advocate-General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a          de Almeida, Judge, acting as President of the Fifth Chamber,
judgment in which it:                                              D. A. O. Edward and J.-P. Puissochet (Rapporteur), Judges;
                                                                   F. G. Jacobs, Advocate-General; L. Hewlett, Administrator,
                                                                   for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 9 March 1995 , in
1 , dismisses the application for revision as inadmissible;        which it rules :