CELEX: 62015TA0403
Language: en
Date: 2017-05-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-403/15: Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2017 — JYSK v Commission (Action for annulment — ERDF — Article 41(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 — Refusal to grant a financial contribution to a major project — Undertaking responsible for project implementation — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)

19.6.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 195/20
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 4 May 2017 — JYSK v Commission
   (Case T-403/15) (1)
   
   ((Action for annulment - ERDF - Article 41(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 - Refusal to grant a financial contribution to a major project - Undertaking responsible for project implementation - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility))
   (2017/C 195/26)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: JYSK sp. z o.o. (Radomsko, Poland) (represented by: H. Sønderby Christensen, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by R. Lyal, B.-R. Killmann and M. Clausen, and subsequently by R. Lyal and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 3228 of 11 May 2015, refusing to make a financial contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to the major project ‘European Shared Services Centre — Intelligent Logistics Systems’ forming part of the operational programme ‘Innovative Economy’ drawn up by the Republic of Poland for the 2007-2013 programming period.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action as inadmissible;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders JYSK sp. z o.o. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.