CELEX: C2007/129/46
Language: en
Date: 2007-06-09 00:00:00
Title: Case F-34/07: Action brought on 13 April 2007 — Skareby v Commission

9.6.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 129/27
            
         Action brought on 13 April 2007 — Skareby v Commission
   (Case F-34/07)
   (2007/C 129/46)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Carina Skareby (Bichkek, Kirghizistan) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the applicant's Career Development Report (CDR) for 2005;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Annul, in so far as necessary, the decision of the Appointing Authority (AIPN) rejecting the applicant's appeal;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Indicate to the AIPN the effects of annulment of the contested decisions and in particular the adoption of a new CDR for 2005, this time in compliance with the statutory rules;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the AIPN to pay to the applicant: i) a sum fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 15 000 in respect of compensation for her non-material damage; ii) a sum fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 15 000 in respect of compensation for the professional injury suffered by her; iii) a sum to be fixed in equity by the Tribunal in respect of her financial loss, late payment interest to run on each of those sums at the legal rate with effect from the date on which they become payable;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   In support of her claim, the applicant first alleges failure to comply with the rules governing establishment of the CDR. The administration infringed the rules of procedure established by the general implementing provisions of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and committed manifest errors of assessment.
   The applicant then alleges infringement of the rights of the defence, the principle of sound administration and the duty to have regard for the welfare of officials.
   Finally, she alleges that the administration misused its powers and misused the procedure.