CELEX: 62007FA0125
Language: en
Date: 2009-09-29 00:00:00
Title: Case F-125/07: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Hau v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Promotion — 2006 promotion exercise — Non-inclusion on the list of promoted officials — Comparative examination of the merits — Relevant threshold — Failure to take into account the fact that the official concerned was included in the reserve)

30.1.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 24/73
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2009 — Hau v Parliament
   (Case F-125/07) (1)
   
   (Staff case - Officials - Promotion - 2006 promotion exercise - Non-inclusion on the list of promoted officials - Comparative examination of the merits - Relevant threshold - Failure to take into account the fact that the official concerned was included in the reserve)
   2010/C 24/133
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Armin Hau (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: K. Zejdová and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   First, annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority to not promote the applicant to grade B*7 for the 2006 promotion exercise and second, an application for the Appointing Authority to produce the documents concerning the comparative examination of the merits for that promotion.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the European Parliament, published on 21 November 2006, to not include Mr Hau on the list of officials promoted from grade B*6 to grade B*7 for the 2006 promotion exercise;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008, p. 37.