CELEX: 62014TB0338
Language: en
Date: 2015-01-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-338/14: Order of the General Court of 27 January 2015  — UNIC v Commission (Action for annulment — Joint actions to promote sustainable development economically, socially and environmentally in developing countries — Generalised tariff preferences granted to treated and partly treated leather originating from India, Pakistan and Ethiopia — Rejection of the application for a temporary withdrawal of the benefit of generalised preferences — Measure not subject to review — Inadmissibility)

23.3.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 96/20
            
         Order of the General Court of 27 January 2015 — UNIC v Commission
   (Case T-338/14) (1)
   
   ((Action for annulment - Joint actions to promote sustainable development economically, socially and environmentally in developing countries - Generalised tariff preferences granted to treated and partly treated leather originating from India, Pakistan and Ethiopia - Rejection of the application for a temporary withdrawal of the benefit of generalised preferences - Measure not subject to review - Inadmissibility))
   (2015/C 096/26)
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Unione nazionale industria conciaria (UNIC) (Milan, Italy) (represented by: A. Fratini and M. Bottino, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and D. Recchia, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 19 March 2014 addressed to the applicant and rejecting its request for initiation of a temporary withdrawal procedure in respect of the generalised preferential arrangements granted to the Republic of India, the Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia with regard to raw hides and semi-manufactured leather goods.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is rejected as inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for intervention made by the Republic of Italy.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The Unione nazionale industria conciaria (UNIC) shall bear its own costs and those incurred by the Commission.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 212, 7.7.2014.