CELEX: C2006/108/10
Language: en
Date: 2006-05-06 00:00:00
Title: Case C-120/06P: Appeal brought on  27 February 2006  by Fabbrica Italiana Accumulatori Motocarri Mentecchio SpA (FIAMM), Fabbrica Italiana Accumulatori Motocarri Montecchio Technologies Inc (FIAMM Technologies) against the judgment delivered on  14 December 2005  in Case T-69/00 Fabbrica Italiana Accumulatori Motocarri Mentecchio SpA (FIAMM), Fabbrica Italiana Accumulatori Motocarri Montecchio Technologies Inc (FIAMM Technologies) v Council of the European Union and Commission of the Euorpean Communities

6.5.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 108/6
            
         Appeal brought on 27 February 2006 by Fabbrica Italiana Accumulatori Motocarri Mentecchio SpA (FIAMM), Fabbrica Italiana Accumulatori Motocarri Montecchio Technologies Inc (FIAMM Technologies) against the judgment delivered on 14 December 2005 in Case T-69/00 Fabbrica Italiana Accumulatori Motocarri Mentecchio SpA (FIAMM), Fabbrica Italiana Accumulatori Motocarri Montecchio Technologies Inc (FIAMM Technologies) v Council of the European Union and Commission of the Euorpean Communities
   (Case C-120/06P)
   (2006/C 108/10)
   Language of the case: Italian
   Parties
   
      Appellants: Fabbrica Italiana Accumulatori Motocarri Mentecchio SpA (FIAMM), Fabbrica Italiana Accumulatori Motocarri Montecchio Technologies Inc (FIAMM Technologies) (represented by: I. Van Bael, F. Di Gianni and A Cevese, Avvocati)
   
      Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union and Commission of the European Communities
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               On the basis that the state of the proceedings so permits, give a substantive ruling confirming the appellants' entitlement to compensation arising out of the defendants' liability for an unlawful act or for a lawful act;
            
         
               —
            
            
               in any event, order the defendants to pay the costs both of these proceedings and those before the Court of First Instance;
            
         
               —
            
            
               in the alternative, grant the appellants fair compensation as a result of the unreasonable length of the procedure before the Court of First Instance;
            
         
               —
            
            
               grant such further and other relief as fairness might require.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   The appellants submit that the judgment under appeal is defective in that it fails totally to state grounds concerning one of the principal arguments raised, namely, that in the specific factual circumstances of the case, the appellants are entitled to rely on the decision adopted by the Appeal Board of the World Trade Organisation to establish unlawful conduct on the part of the Community for the purpose of their claim for compensation.