CELEX: 62021TN0534
Language: en
Date: 2021-09-01 00:00:00
Title: Case T-534/21: Action brought on 1 September 2021 — VP v Cedefop

25.10.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 431/47
            
         
      Action brought on 1 September 2021 — VP v Cedefop
      (Case T-534/21)
      (2021/C 431/55)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: VP (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the defendant’s decision not to implement sections (1) and (2) of the operational part of the judgment of the GCEU, of 16 December 2020, in case T-187/18, VP v Cedefop;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul the connected decision not to renew the applicant’s employment contract for an indefinite period with retroactive effect;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the compensation of the moral prejudice suffered by the applicant evaluated ex aequo et bono to fifty thousand Euros;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the compensation of the material damage incurred by the applicant equal to the cost of the necessary pre-litigation procedure from the date of the judgment in Case T-187/18, VP v Cedefop; and
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to pay the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging that the defendant’s decision not to implement the core sections (1) and (2) of the judgment of 16 December 2020 in case T-187/20, VP v Cedefop and, consequently, not to renew the employment contract of the applicant is vitiated by a violation of the obligation to state reasons;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed its obligation to duty of care.
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed the principles of equal treatment and protection of legitimate expectations.
               
            
                  4.
               
               
                  Forth plea in law, alleging that the defendant misused its powers.