CELEX: C2002/031/20
Language: en
Date: 2002-02-02 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 19 September 2001 in Case T-227/00: Far Eastern Textiles Ltd v Council of the European Union (Action for annulment — Retrospective amendment of the contested act — Case not proceeding to judgment)

C 31/10                 EN                    Official Journal of the European Communities                                          2.2.2002
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                               with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Council of
                                                                         the European Union (Agents: S. Marquardt and G. Berrisch) —
                     of 19 September 2001                                application for the annulment of Council Regulation (EC)
                                                                         No 978/2000 of 8 May 2000 imposing a definitive
                                                                         countervailing duty on imports of synthetic fibres of polyester
in Case T-226/00: Nan Ya Plastics Corporation v Council
                                                                         originating in Australia, Indonesia and Taiwan and collecting
                    of the European Union (1)
                                                                         definitively the provisional duty imposed (OJ 2000 L 113,
                                                                         p. 1) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, Extended
(Action for annulment — Retrospective amendment of the                   Composition), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. Garcı́a-
      contested act — Case not proceeding to judgment)                   Valdecasas, J.D. Cooke, M. Vilaras and N.J. Forwood, Judges;
                                                                         H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 19 September 2001, the
                          (2002/C 31/19)                                 operative part of which is as follows:
                   (Language of the case: English)
                                                                         1.    There is no need to adjudicate on the application.
In Case T-226/00: Nan Ya Plastics Corporation, established in            2.    There is no need to give a decision on the application for leave
Taiwan (Republic of China), represented by P. De Baere, lawyer,                to intervene submitted by the Commission.
with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Council of
the European Union (Agents: S. Marquardt and G. Berrisch) —              3.    The defendant shall pay the costs.
application for the annulment of Council Regulation (EC)
No 978/2000 of 8 May 2000 imposing a definitive
countervailing duty on imports of synthetic fibres of polyester          (1) OJ C 316, 4.11.2000.
originating in Australia, Indonesia and Taiwan and collecting
definitively the provisional duty imposed (OJ 2000 L 113,
p. 1) — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, Extended
Composition), composed of P. Lindh, President, R. Garcı́a-
Valdecasas, J.D. Cooke, M. Vilaras and N.J. Forwood, Judges;
H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 19 September 2001, the
operative part of which is as follows:
1.   There is no need to adjudicate on the application.
                                                                               ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
2.   There is no need to give a decision on the application for leave
     to intervene submitted by the Commission.
                                                                                                of 24 October 2001
3.   The defendant shall pay the costs.
                                                                         in Case T-352/00: Andrew M. Rosemarine v Office for
(1) OJ C 316, 4.11.2000.                                                 Harmonization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
                                                                                                 Designs) (OHIM) (1)
                                                                         (Temporary staff — Recruitment — Age limit — Rejection
                                                                         of application — Action for damages — Inadmissibility —
                                                                                Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                     of 19 September 2001                                                          (2002/C 31/21)
in Case T-227/00: Far Eastern Textiles Ltd v Council of                                      (Language of the case: English)
                     the European Union (1)
(Action for annulment — Retrospective amendment of the
      contested act — Case not proceeding to judgment)
                                                                         In Case T-352/00: Andrew M. Rosemarine, residing in Salford
                          (2002/C 31/20)                                 (United Kingdom), represented initially by J. Davies and
                                                                         subsequently by S. Whale, lawyers, against Office for Harmon-
                                                                         ization in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
                   (Language of the case: English)
                                                                         (OHIM) (Agents: O. Montalto and F. Casertano) — application
                                                                         for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the
                                                                         applicant by reason of the rejection of his application for a
In Case T-227/00: Far Eastern Textiles Ltd, established in               post of English-language lawyer-linguist — the Court of First
Taiwan (Republic of China), represented by P. De Baere, lawyer,          Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President,