CELEX: 62013CA0439
Language: en
Date: 2015-11-12 00:00:00
Title: Case C-439/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 November 2015 — Elitaliana SpA v Eulex Kosovo (Appeal — Public service contracts — Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP — Call for tenders for helicopter support for the Eulex Mission in Kosovo — Action brought against the decision awarding the contract — Article 24(1), second subparagraph, TEU — Article 275, first subparagraph, TFEU — Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) — Jurisdiction of the Court — Article 263, first paragraph, TFEU — Meaning of ‘bodies, offices or agencies of the Union’ — Measures attributable to the European Commission — Excusable error)

18.1.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 16/2
            
         Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 12 November 2015 — Elitaliana SpA v Eulex Kosovo
   (Case C-439/13 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Public service contracts - Joint Action 2008/124/CFSP - Call for tenders for helicopter support for the Eulex Mission in Kosovo - Action brought against the decision awarding the contract - Article 24(1), second subparagraph, TEU - Article 275, first subparagraph, TFEU - Common foreign and security policy (CFSP) - Jurisdiction of the Court - Article 263, first paragraph, TFEU - Meaning of ‘bodies, offices or agencies of the Union’ - Measures attributable to the European Commission - Excusable error))
   (2016/C 016/02)
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Elitaliana SpA (represented by: R. Colagrande, avvocato)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Eulex Kosovo (represented by: G. Brosadola Pontotti, Solicitor)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the appeal;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Elitaliana SpA to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 304, 19.10.2013.