CELEX: 62013TA0562
Language: en
Date: 2016-02-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-562/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Isotis v Commission (Arbitration clause — Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme — REACH112 contract — Reimbursement of sums advanced — Eligible costs)

21.3.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 106/29
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 4 February 2016 — Isotis v Commission
   (Case T-562/13) (1)
   
   ((Arbitration clause - Competitiveness and Innovation Framework Programme - REACH112 contract - Reimbursement of sums advanced - Eligible costs))
   (2016/C 106/32)
   Language of the case: Greek
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Koinonia Tis Pliroforias Anoichti Stis Eidikes Anagkes — Isotis (Athens, Greece) (represented by: S. Skliris, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Di Paolo and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents, and initially by E. Petritsi, then by E. Roussou, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   First, applications based on Article 272 TFEU, seeking, primarily, to have the Commission’s request seeking reimbursement of pre-financing of EUR 47 197,93 paid to the applicant under contract No 238940, ‘REsponding to All Citizens needing Help (REACH112)’, concluded between the Commission and the applicant to be declared unfounded, and, alternatively, to have the Commission’s request seeking reimbursement of that pre-financing as regards the expenses submitted to the Commission for the first reference period of the REACH112 project for a sum of EUR 13 821,12 to be declared unfounded, and, second, counterclaim seeking to order the applicant to reimburse the pre-financing unduly paid in the context of that contract and interest for late payment.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1)
            
            
               Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on Koinonia Tis Pliroforias Anoichti Stis Eidikes Anagkes — Isotis’ claim seeking a declaration that as the general conditions of the Sixth Framework Programme do not apply to the contract at issue, it cannot be liable for liquidated damages under that contract and that, therefore, the European Commission infringed the contract at issue by declaring its intention to claim such damages;
            
         
               2)
            
            
               Declares that Koinonia Tis Pliroforias Anoichti Stis Eidikes Anagkes — Isotis’ application seeking a finding that there is no basis for the claim for reimbursement of pre-financing which it has received under contract No. 238940 ‘Responding to All Citizens Needing Help (REACH112)’ is upheld as regards the costs declared by it for the first reference period of the REACH112 project;
            
         
               3)
            
            
               Declares that Koinonia Tis Pliroforias Anoichti Stis Eidikes Anagkes — IsoTis’ action is dismissed as to the remainder;
            
         
               4)
            
            
               Declares that the Commission’s application seeking to order reimbursement by Koinonia Tis Pliroforias Anoichti Stis Eidikes Anagkes — Isotis of pre-financing which it has received under contract No. 238940 ‘Responding to All Citizens Needing Help (REACH112)’ is rejected as regards the costs declared by it for the first reference period of the REACH112 project;
            
         
               5)
            
            
               Orders that Koinonia Tis Pliroforias Anoichti Stis Eidikes Anagkes — IsoTis shall pay the Commission the amount of EUR 33 376,81, plus interest at the rate of 4 % per annum as of 29 October 2013 and until full payment of that amount;
            
         
               6)
            
            
               Orders that Koinonia Tis Pliroforias Anoichti Stis Eidikes Anagkes — IsoTis and the Commission shall each bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 9, 11.1.2014.