CELEX: 62015TA0730
Language: en
Date: 2017-03-02 00:00:00
Title: Case T-730/15: Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2017 — DI v EASO (Appeal — Civil service — EASO staff — Member of the contract staff — Fixed-term contract — Probationary period — Dismissal decision — Action for annulment and for damages — Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible at first instance — Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint — Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations)

18.4.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 121/27
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 2 March 2017 — DI v EASO
   (Case T-730/15) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Civil service - EASO staff - Member of the contract staff - Fixed-term contract - Probationary period - Dismissal decision - Action for annulment and for damages - Dismissal of the action as manifestly inadmissible at first instance - Rule of correspondence between the application and the complaint - Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations))
   (2017/C 121/39)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: DI (represented by: I. Vlaic and G. Iliescu, lawyers)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (represented by: W. Stevens, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015, DI v EASO (F-113/13, EU:F:2015:120), seeking to have that order set aside.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Sets aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015, DI v EASO (F-113/13);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Refers the case to a chamber of the General Court other than that which ruled on the present appeal;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Reserves the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.