CELEX: 62011FB0070
Language: en
Date: 2012-12-12 00:00:00
Title: Case F-70/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 — Lebedef v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appraisal procedure for 2008 — Half -time secondment for the purposes of union representation — Staff report covering the tasks carried out in the service to which he was assigned — Consultation of the ad hoc group — Designation under the Staff Regulations — Designation for union purposes — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

9.2.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 38/32
            
         Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 — Lebedef v Commission
   (Case F-70/11) (1)
   
   (Civil service - Officials - Appraisal procedure for 2008 - Half -time secondment for the purposes of union representation - Staff report covering the tasks carried out in the service to which he was assigned - Consultation of the ad hoc group - Designation under the Staff Regulations - Designation for union purposes - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
   2013/C 38/62
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Giorgio Lebedef (Senningerberg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Frabetti, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the applicant’s staff report for the period from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2008.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Lebedef must bear her own costs and is ordered pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011, p. 52.