CELEX: 62014TA0783
Language: en
Date: 2017-02-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-783/14: Judgment of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — SolarWorld v Commission (Dumping — Subsidies — Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells) originating in or consigned from China — Approval of a downward adjustment of the minimum import price pursuant to an undertaking accepted in connection with anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings — Union industry — Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009)

3.4.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 104/43
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — SolarWorld v Commission
   (Case T-783/14) (1)
   
   ((Dumping - Subsidies - Imports of crystalline silicon photovoltaic modules and key components (cells) originating in or consigned from China - Approval of a downward adjustment of the minimum import price pursuant to an undertaking accepted in connection with anti-dumping and anti-subsidy proceedings - Union industry - Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009))
   (2017/C 104/60)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: SolarWorld AG (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: L. Ruessmann, lawyer, and J. Beck, Solicitor)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and A. Stobiecka-Kuik, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the Commission’s decision, contained in a letter of 15 September 2014 addressed to the Chinese Chamber of Commerce for the Import and Export of Machinery and Electronic Products, bearing the reference TRADE/H4 (2014) 3328168, on the downward adjustment of the minimum import price for imports of photovoltaic modules and cells manufactured by Chinese exporting producers subject to a price undertaking with effect from 1 October 2014 for the last quarter of 2014.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders SolarWorld AG to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 73, 2.3.2015.