CELEX: 62009CA0404
Language: en
Date: 2011-11-24 00:00:00
Title: Case C-404/09: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 85/337/EEC — Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment — Directive 92/43/EEC — Conservation of natural habitats — Wild fauna and flora — Open-cast coal mines — ‘Alto Sil’ site — Special protection area — Site of Community importance — Brown bear (Ursus arctos) — Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus))

28.1.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 25/3
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 24 November 2011 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain
      (Case C-404/09) (1)
      
      (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 85/337/EEC - Assessment of the effects of certain projects on the environment - Directive 92/43/EEC - Conservation of natural habitats - Wild fauna and flora - Open-cast coal mines - ‘Alto Sil’ site - Special protection area - Site of Community importance - Brown bear (Ursus arctos) - Capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus))
      (2012/C 25/05)
      Language of the case: Spanish
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and by F. Castillo de la Torre and J.-B. Laignelot, Agents)
      
         Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: N. Díaz Abad, Agent)
      
         Re:
      
      Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Infringement of Articles 2, 3 and 5(1) and (3) of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Directive 97/11/EEC (OJ L 175, p. 40) and Article 6(2)(3) and (4) in conjunction with Article 7 of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora (OJ L 206, p. 7) — Opencast mining — ‘Alto Sil’ special conservation area (ES0000210) — Habitat of Cantabrian capercaillie.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Declares that, by authorising the ‘Nueva Julia’ and ‘Ladrones’ open-cast mines but failing to subject that authorisation to an assessment in order to identify, describe and assess in an appropriate manner the direct, indirect and cumulative effects of the existing open-cast mining projects, save, in relation to the ‘Ladrones’ mine, as regards the brown bear (Ursus arctos), the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2, 3 and 5(1) and (3) of Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment, as amended by Council Directive 97/11/EC of 3 March 1997;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Declares that, from 2000, the date of designation of the ‘Alto Sil’ area as a special protection area under Council Directive 79/409/EEC of 2 April 1979 on the conservation of wild birds, as amended by Commission Directive 97/49/EC of 29 July 1997,
                  
                              —
                           
                           
                              by authorising the ‘Nueva Julia’ and ‘Ladrones’ open-cast mining operations, without making the grant of the authorisations relating thereto subject to the carrying out of an appropriate assessment of the possible impacts of those projects, and, in any event, without complying with the conditions in which a project might be realised despite the risk posed by that project for the capercaillie (Tetrao urogallus), which constitutes one of the natural assets which motivated the classification of the ‘Alto Sil’ site as a special protection area, namely the absence of alternative solutions, the existence of imperative reasons of major public interest and communication to the European Commission of the necessary compensatory measures to ensure the overall coherence of the Natura 2000 network, and
                           
                        
                              —
                           
                           
                              by failing to adopt the necessary measures to prevent the deterioration of habitats including the habitats of species, and to prevent significant disturbance of the capercaillie, the presence of which on the ‘Alto Sil’ site was the reason for the designation of that area as a special protection area, caused by the ‘Feixolín’, ‘Salguero-Prégame-Valdesegadas’, ‘Fonfría’, ‘Ampliación de Feixolín’ and ‘Nueva Julia’ mines,
                           
                        the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations in relation to the ‘Alto Sil’ special protection area under Article 6(2) to (4) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, in conjunction with Article 7 thereof;
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Declares that, from December 2004, by failing to adopt the necessary measures to prevent the deterioration of habitats, including the habitats of species, and the disturbances caused to species by the ‘Feixolín’, ‘Fonfría’ and ‘Ampliación de Feixolín’ operations, the Kingdom of Spain has failed, in relation to the ‘Alto Sil’ site of Community importance, to fulfil its obligations under Article 6(2) of Directive 92/43;
               
            
                  4.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
               
            
                  5.
               
               
                  Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay, in addition to its own costs, two thirds of the Commission’s costs. The Commission is ordered to pay one third of its own costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.