CELEX: 62017CA0132
Language: en
Date: 2018-02-21 00:00:00
Title: Case C-132/17: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof, Germany) — Peugeot Deutschland GmbH v Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Freedom to provide services — Directive 2010/13/EU — Definitions — Concept of ‘audiovisual media service’ — Scope — Channel available on YouTube for videos promoting new passenger car models)

16.4.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 134/10
            
         Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof, Germany) — Peugeot Deutschland GmbH v Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV
   (Case C-132/17) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom to provide services - Directive 2010/13/EU - Definitions - Concept of ‘audiovisual media service’ - Scope - Channel available on YouTube for videos promoting new passenger car models))
   (2018/C 134/13)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Referring court
   
   Bundesgerichtshof
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Appellant: Peugeot Deutschland GmbH
   
      Respondent: Deutsche Umwelthilfe eV
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Article 1(1)(a) of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (the Audiovisual Media Services Directive) must be interpreted as meaning that the definition of ‘audiovisual media service’ covers neither a video channel, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, on which internet users can view short promotional videos for new passenger car models, nor a single video of that kind considered in isolation.
   
      (1)  OJ C 213, 3.7.2017.