CELEX: 62013TA0578
Language: en
Date: 2015-06-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-578/13: Judgment of the General Court of 3 June 2015 — Luxembourg Pamol (Cyprus) and Luxembourg Industries v Commission (Action for annulment — Plant protection products — Publication of documents relating to the inclusion of an active substance — Refusal of the request for confidential treatment of certain information — Contested act not attributable to the defendant — Inadmissibility)

20.7.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 236/37
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 3 June 2015 — Luxembourg Pamol (Cyprus) and Luxembourg Industries v Commission
   (Case T-578/13) (1)
   
   ((Action for annulment - Plant protection products - Publication of documents relating to the inclusion of an active substance - Refusal of the request for confidential treatment of certain information - Contested act not attributable to the defendant - Inadmissibility))
   (2015/C 236/49)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Luxembourg Pamol (Cyprus) Ltd (Nicosia, Cyprus); and Luxembourg Industries Ltd (Tel Aviv, Israel) (represented by: C. Mereu and K. van Maldegem, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action for the annulment of the decision, notified by letter of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) of 8 October 2013, to publish certain parts of documents in respect of which the applicants had requested confidentiality.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action as inadmissible;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Luxembourg Pamol (Cyprus) Ltd and Luxembourg Industries Ltd to pay the costs, including those relating to the interim proceedings.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 45, 15.2.2014.