CELEX: 62020CN0532
Language: en
Date: 2020-10-20 00:00:00
Title: Case C-532/20: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (Romania) lodged on 20 October 2020 — Alstom Transport SA v Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA, Strabag AG — Sucursala Bucureşti, and Swietelsky AG Linz — Sucursala Bucureşti

15.2.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 53/17
            
         
      Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti (Romania) lodged on 20 October 2020 — Alstom Transport SA v Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA, Strabag AG — Sucursala Bucureşti, and Swietelsky AG Linz — Sucursala Bucureşti
      (Case C-532/20)
      (2021/C 53/21)
      Language of the case: Romanian
      
         Referring court
      
      Curtea de Apel Bucureşti
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Appellant: Alstom Transport SA
      
         Respondents: Compania Naţională de Căi Ferate CFR SA, Strabag AG — Sucursala Bucureşti, and Swietelsky AG Linz — Sucursala Bucureşti
      
         Question referred
      
      Are the third subparagraph of Article 1(1), Article 1(3) and Article 2c of Council Directive 92/13/EEC of 25 February 1992 coordinating the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the application of Community rules on the procurement procedures of entities operating in the water, energy, transport and telecommunications sectors (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the period within which the successful tenderer in an award procedure may apply for review of the decision of the contracting authority declaring admissible the bid submitted by a tenderer placed lower in the ranking must be calculated by reference to the date on which the interest of the successful tenderer arose, that is, upon the lodging by the unsuccessful tenderer of an action against the outcome of the award procedure?
      
         (1)  OJ 1992 L 76, p. 14.