CELEX: 62014CN0498
Language: en
Date: 2014-11-10 00:00:00
Title: Case C-498/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 10 November 2014 — (Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.) v (Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.)

19.1.2015   
               
               
                  EN
               
               
                  Official Journal of the European Union
               
               
                  C 16/19
               
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d’appel de Bruxelles (Belgium) lodged on 10 November 2014 — RG (*1) v SF (*1)
         
         (Case C-498/14)
         (2015/C 016/29)
         Language of the case: French
         
            Referring court
         
         Cour d’appel de Bruxelles
         
            Parties to the main proceedings
         
         
            Applicant: RG (*1)
         
         
            Defendant: SF (*1)
         
         
            Question referred
         
         Are the provisions in Article 11(7) and (8) of Council Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 of 27 November 2003 concerning jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in matrimonial matters and the matters of parental responsibility, repealing Regulation (EC) No 1347/2000 (1) (‘the Brussels IIa Regulation’) to be interpreted as precluding a Member State from:
         
                     —
                  
                  
                     giving preference to the specialisation of courts in situations of parental child abduction with respect to the procedure provided for in those [provisions] even where a court or tribunal has already been seised of proceedings concerning the substance of parental responsibility in relation to the child?
                  
               
                     —
                  
                  
                     removing, from the court seised of proceedings on the substance of parental responsibility in relation to the child, jurisdiction to give judgment on the custody of the child, even though that court has jurisdiction, under international and national law, to give judgment on questions of parental responsibility in relation to the child?
                  
               
            (*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.
         
            (1)  OJ 2000 L 338, p. 1.