CELEX: C2003/239/11
Language: en
Date: 2003-10-04 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 3 July 2003 in Case T-34/03: André Hecq and Syndicat des Fonctionnaires Internationaux et Européens (SFIE) v Commission of the European Communities (Formal inadmissibility of the application — Legal person governed by private law — Instructions given to lawyer)

C 239/8                 EN                           Official Journal of the European Union                                            4.10.2003
                                                           COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                         ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                           of 3 July 2003                                                                of 3 July 2003
in Case T-257/01, Frosch Touristik GmbH v Office for                         in Case T-34/03: André Hecq and Syndicat des Fonction-
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and                        naires Internationaux et Européens (SFIE) v Commission
                        Designs) (OHIM) ( 1)                                                 of the European Communities ( 1)
(Community trade mark — Opposition — Amicable settle-                        (Formal inadmissibility of the application — Legal person
                  ment — No need to adjudicate)                                  governed by private law — Instructions given to lawyer)
                          (2003/C 239/10)                                                               (2003/C 239/11)
                    (Language of the case: German)                                                (Language of the case: French)
In Case T-257/01: Frosch Touristik GmbH, established in
Munich (Germany), represented by G. Zeiner and B. Heaman-                    In Case T-34/03: André Hecq, official of the Commission,
Dunn, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg v                   residing in Mondercange (Luxembourg), and Syndicat des
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks                 fonctionnaires internationaux et européen (SFIE), established
and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider), the intervener                    in Brussels (Belgium), represented by L. Vogel, lawyer, against
before the Court of First Instance being Air Marin Flugreisen                Commission of the European Communities — application for
GmbH, established in Bonn (Germany), represented by C. Don-                  annulment of the decision of the Commission of 4 October
le, lawyer — Action brought against the decision of the Office               2002 rejecting the complaint lodged by Mr André Hecq, acting
for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and                    in his own name and in his capacity as Secretary-General of
Designs) of 31 July 2001 (Case R 789/1999-2) relating to                     the SFIE union against the decisions of the Commission laying
opposition proceedings between Frosch Touristik GmbH and                     down the rules on resources available to staff representatives
Air Marin Flugreisen GmbH — the Court of First Instance                      from 1 January 2002 and against the decision on the budgetary
(Fourth Chamber), composed of V. Tiili, President and P. Men-                resources to be allocated to the SFIE union led by Mr Hecq and
gozzi and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an                for damages — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber),
order on 3 July 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:             composed of R. García-Valdecasas, President, P. Lindh and
                                                                             J. D. Cooke, judges; H. Jung, registrar, has given an order on
                                                                             3 July 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:
1)    There is no further need to adjudicate in this action;
                                                                             1.     The action is inadmissible insofar as it is brought by the
2)    The applicant shall bear its own costs and those of the Office;               Syndicat des fonctionnaires internationaux et européens (SFIE).
3)    The intervener shall bear its own costs.                               2.     The SFIE shall bear its own costs.
( 1) OJ C 3 of 5.1.02.                                                       (1 ) OJ C 101, 26.4.2003.