CELEX: 62008CA0583
Language: en
Date: 2010-05-20 00:00:00
Title: Case C-583/08 P: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2010 — Christos Gogos v European Commission (Appeals — Officials — Internal competition for promotion from one category to another — Appointment — Classification in grade — Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations — Unlimited jurisdiction — Dispute of a financial character — Length of proceedings before the General Court — Reasonable time — Claim for equitable compensation)

3.7.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 179/8
            
         Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 May 2010 — Christos Gogos v European Commission
   (Case C-583/08 P) (1)
   
   (Appeals - Officials - Internal competition for promotion from one category to another - Appointment - Classification in grade - Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations - Unlimited jurisdiction - Dispute of a financial character - Length of proceedings before the General Court - Reasonable time - Claim for equitable compensation)
   2010/C 179/12
   Language of the case: Greek
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Christos Gogos (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and P. Katsimani, dikigoroi)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, acting as Agent, assisted by P.I. Anestis, dikigoros)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Seventh Chamber) of 15 October 2008 in Case T-66/04 Gogos v Commission, by which the Court of First Instance dismissed an action for annulment of the Commission’s decision to place the applicant in Grade A 7 when he was appointed.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the appeal;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Mr Gogos and the Commission to bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 44, 21.2.2009.