CELEX: 62016TA0811
Language: en
Date: 2018-11-29 00:00:00
Title: Case T-811/16: Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2018 — Di Bernardo v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Recruitment — Competition notice — Open competition — Non-inclusion on the reserve list — Obligation to state reasons — Professional experience — Liability)

4.2.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 44/26
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2018 — Di Bernardo v Commission
      (Case T-811/16) (1)
      
      ((Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Competition notice - Open competition - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Obligation to state reasons - Professional experience - Liability))
      (2019/C 44/32)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Danilo Di Bernardo (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the selection board in the open competition on the basis of tests EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 of 10 August 2016 not to include the applicant on the reserve list for the recruitment of secretaries/clerks at grade SC 1 in the field of financial support and, secondly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Annuls the decision of the selection board in the open competition on the basis of tests EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 of 10 August 2016 not to include Mr Danilo Di Bernardo on the reserve list for the recruitment of secretaries/clerks at grade SC 1 in the field of financial support;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.