CELEX: C2004/168/19
Language: en
Date: 2004-06-26 00:00:00
Title: Case T-151/04: Action brought on 16 April 2004 by Bernard Nonat against Commission of the European Communities

26.6.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 168/10
            
         Action brought on 16 April 2004 by Bernard Nonat against Commission of the European Communities
   (Case T-151/04)
   (2004/C 168/19)
   Language of the case: French
   An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 16 April 2004 by Bernard Nonat, residing in Brussels, represented by Sébastien Orlandi, Albert Coolen, Jean-Nöel Louis and Etienne Marchal, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg.
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision establishing the final career development report for the period from 1 July to 31 December 2002;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   The applicant in this case objects to his career development report, as drawn up for the period from 1 July to 31 December 2002.
   In support of his claims, the applicant argues:
   
               —
            
            
               failure to observe the obligation to state reasons;
            
         
               —
            
            
               infringement of Article 43 of the Staff Regulations and the transitional measures applicable to the appraisal exercise 2001-2002;
            
         
               —
            
            
               infringement of Article 5(5)(c) of the General Provisions for Implementing Article 43 of the Staff Regulations;
            
         
               —
            
            
               manifest error of assessment;
            
         
               —
            
            
               infringement of the principle of equal treatment and non-discrimination;
            
         
               —
            
            
               lack of consistency between the comments and the mark awarded.