CELEX: 62006FB0141
Language: en
Date: 2009-09-15 00:00:00
Title: Case F-141/06: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 September 2009 — Hartwig v Commission (Appointment — Members of the temporary staff appointed as officials — Candidates names included on a reserve list of a competition published prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Grading pursuant to the new less favourable rules — Transitional measures of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

7.11.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 267/84
            
         Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 15 September 2009 — Hartwig v Commission
   (Case F-141/06) (1)
   
   (Appointment - Members of the temporary staff appointed as officials - Candidates names included on a reserve list of a competition published prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Grading pursuant to the new less favourable rules - Transitional measures of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)
   2009/C 267/152
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Marc Hartwig (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: T. Bontinck, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Annulment of the decisions of the Commission and the Parliament with effect from 16 April 2006 by which the applicant, a member of temporary staff in grade B*7 and successful candidate in Open Competition PE/34/B, was appointed an official in grade B*3, step 2, pursuant to the provisions of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               There is no need to rule on the action in Case F-141/06 Hartwig v Commission.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007, p. 40.