CELEX: 62018TB0025
Language: en
Date: 2019-02-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-25/18: Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 — PAN Europe v Commission (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 — Documents relating to endocrine-disrupting substances — Withdrawal of the decision refusing access — Disclosure after the action had been brought — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

15.4.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 139/54
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 27 February 2019 — PAN Europe v Commission
      (Case T-25/18) (1)
      
      (Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Regulation (EC) No 1367/2006 - Documents relating to endocrine-disrupting substances - Withdrawal of the decision refusing access - Disclosure after the action had been brought - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
      (2019/C 139/55)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Pesticide Action Network Europe (PAN Europe) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Kloostra, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet, I. Naglis and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2017) 7604 final of 9 November 2017, in so far as it refuses access to documents relating to endocrine-disrupting substances.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     The European Commission shall pay the costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.