CELEX: 62009FA0009
Language: en
Date: 2010-10-28 00:00:00
Title: Case F-9/09: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 October 2010 — Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission (Staff case — Open competitions EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 in the field of fraud prevention — Act adversely affecting the applicants — Exclusion of candidates following results obtained in admission tests — EPSO not competent)

15.1.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 13/37
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 October 2010 — Vicente Carbajosa and Others v Commission
   (Case F-9/09) (1)
   
   (Staff case - Open competitions EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 in the field of fraud prevention - Act adversely affecting the applicants - Exclusion of candidates following results obtained in admission tests - EPSO not competent)
   2011/C 13/71
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Vicente Carbajosa and Others (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the decision adopting and publishing the competition notices EPSO/AD/116/08 and EPSO/AD/117/08 and the decisions relating to the correction of the pre-selection tests and the written tests and the awarding of marks for the oral tests.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decisions of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) not to admit Ms Vicente Carbajosa in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/117/08 and Ms Lehtinen and Ms Menchén in respect of the competition EPSO/AD/116/08 onto the list of candidates invited to submit a full application;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Dismisses the remainder of the action as being inadmissible;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 82 of 04.04.2009, p. 37.