CELEX: 62017TN0512
Language: en
Date: 2017-08-07 00:00:00
Title: Case T-512/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — OCU and Others v SRB

9.10.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 338/17
            
         Action brought on 7 August 2017 — OCU and Others v SRB
   (Case T-512/17)
   (2017/C 338/18)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Organización de Consumidores y Usuarios (OCU) (Madrid, Spain) and 37 other applicants
   
      Defendant: Single Resolution Board
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicants claim that the General Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               declare that Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 are unlawful and inapplicable;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant, the Single Resolution Board, to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The present action is brought against Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 concerning the adoption of a resolution scheme regarding the Banco Popular Español, S.A.
   The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those raised in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán y Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sánchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.