CELEX: 62016TB0716
Language: en
Date: 2017-07-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-716/16: Order of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — Pfizer and Pfizer Santé familiale v Commission (Action for annulment — Customs union — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff and statistical nomenclature — Classification in the Combined Nomenclature — Tariff subheadings — Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings — Regulatory act entailing implementing measures — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)

4.9.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 293/33
            
         Order of the General Court of 19 July 2017 — Pfizer and Pfizer Santé familiale v Commission
   (Case T-716/16) (1)
   
   ((Action for annulment - Customs union - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff and statistical nomenclature - Classification in the Combined Nomenclature - Tariff subheadings - Customs duties applicable to goods classified under those tariff subheadings - Regulatory act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility))
   (2017/C 293/39)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Pfizer Ltd (Sandwich, United Kingdom) and Pfizer Santé familiale (Paris, France) (represented by: L. Catrain González, lawyer, and E. Wright, Barrister)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros and K. Skelly, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking partial annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2016/1140 of 8 July 2016 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature (OJ 2016 L 189, p. 1).
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Pfizer Ltd and Pfizer Santé familiale shall pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.