CELEX: 62018CN0347
Language: en
Date: 2018-05-28 00:00:00
Title: Case C-347/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2018 — Avv. Alessandro Salvoni v Anna Maria Fiermonte

201807270312025102018/C 285/423472018CJC28520180813EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180528262611Case C-347/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2018 — Avv. Alessandro Salvoni v Anna Maria Fiermonte
 ---documentbreak--- C2852018EN2610120180528EN0042261261Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) lodged on 28 May 2018 — Avv. Alessandro Salvoni v Anna Maria Fiermonte
   (Case C-347/18)2018/C 285/42Language of the case: Italian
      Referring court
   
   Tribunale di Milano
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Avv. Alessandro Salvoni
   
      Defendant: Anna Maria Fiermonte
   
      Question referred
   
   Should Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 (
         1
      ) and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union be interpreted as meaning that it is not possible for the court of origin, which has been requested to issue the certificate provided for in Article 53 of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 with regard to a judgment that has acquired the force of a res judicata, to exercise powers of its own motion to ascertain whether there has been a breach of the rules set out in Chapter II, Section 4 of the Brussels Ibis Regulation, so that it may inform the consumer of any breach that is established and enable the consumer to consider, in full knowledge of the facts, the possibility of availing himself of the remedy provided for in Article 45 of the Regulation?
   (
         1
      )	Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1).