CELEX: 62008CN0263
Language: en
Date: 2008-06-19 00:00:00
Title: Case C-263/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 19 June 2008 — Djurgården-Lilla Värtans Miljöskyddsförening v Stockholms kommun genom dess marknämnd

15.8.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 209/34
            
         Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 19 June 2008 — Djurgården-Lilla Värtans Miljöskyddsförening v Stockholms kommun genom dess marknämnd
   (Case C-263/08)
   (2008/C 209/51)
   Language of the case: Swedish
   Referring court
   Högsta domstolen
   Parties to the main proceedings
   
      Applicant: Djurgården-Lilla Värtans Miljöskyddsförening
   
      Defendant: Stockholms kommun genom dess marknämnd
   Questions referred
   
               1.
            
            
               Is point 10 of Annex II to Directive 85/337 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that it encompasses water-related works which involve the drawing off from a tunnel for power cables of groundwater leaking into it and infiltration (supply) of water into the ground or hill to compensate for any reduction in the groundwater, and the construction and maintenance of installations for the drawing off and infiltration?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               If the answer to Question 1 is affirmative: Does the provision in Article 10a of Directive 85/337 — that under certain circumstances the public concerned is to have access to a review procedure before a court of law or another independent and impartial body established by law to challenge the substantive or procedural legality of a decision — imply that there is also a requirement that the public concerned is to be entitled to challenge a decision of a court in planning consent proceedings in a case where the public concerned has had the opportunity of participating in the court's examination of the question of planning consent and of submitting its views to that court?
            
         
               3.
            
            
               If the answers to Questions 1 and 2 are affirmative: Are Articles 1(2), 6(4) and 10a of Directive 85/337 to be interpreted as meaning that different national requirements can be laid down with regard to the public concerned referred to in Articles 6(4) and 10a, with the result that small, locally established environmental protection associations have a right to participate in the decision-making procedures referred to in Article 6(4) in respect of projects which may have significant effects on the environment in the area where the association is active but do not have a right of appeal such as is referred to in Article 10a?
            
         
      (1)  Council Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ 1985 L 175, p. 40).