CELEX: 62014TB0840
Language: en
Date: 2016-03-11 00:00:00
Title: Case T-840/14: Order of the General Court of 11 March 2016 — International Gaming Projects v OHIM — Sky (Sky BONUS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community figurative mark Sky BONUS — Earlier national word mark SKY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Inadmissibility)

2.5.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 156/43
            
         Order of the General Court of 11 March 2016 — International Gaming Projects v OHIM — Sky (Sky BONUS)
   (Case T-840/14) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community figurative mark Sky BONUS - Earlier national word mark SKY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Restriction of the goods designated in the trade mark application - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Inadmissibility))
   (2016/C 156/58)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: International Gaming Projects Ltd (Valletta, Malta) (represented by: M. Garayalde Niño, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Sky plc, formerly British Sky Broadcasting Group plc (Isleworth, United Kingdom) (represented by: J. Barry, Solicitor)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2014 (Case R 2040/2013-4), relating to opposition proceedings between British Sky Broadcasting Group plc and International Gaming Projects Ltd.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               International Gaming Projects Ltd shall pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 65, 23.2.2015.