CELEX: 62011TA0288
Language: en
Date: 2013-05-06 00:00:00
Title: Case T-288/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2013 — Kieffer Omnitec v Commission (Public service contracts — Procurement procedure — Maintenance of the HVAC, sprinkler and water and sanitary installations in the Joseph-Bech building in Luxembourg — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Equal treatment — Transparency — Proportionality — Manifest error of assessment — Duty to state reasons)

15.6.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 171/26
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 6 May 2013 — Kieffer Omnitec v Commission
   (Case T-288/11) (1)
   
   (Public service contracts - Procurement procedure - Maintenance of the HVAC, sprinkler and water and sanitary installations in the Joseph-Bech building in Luxembourg - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Equal treatment - Transparency - Proportionality - Manifest error of assessment - Duty to state reasons)
   2013/C 171/50
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: A+P Kieffer Omnitec Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Delvaux, V. Bertrand and M. Devos, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission (represented by: A.-M. Rouchaud-Joët and S. Delaude, acting as Agents, and V. Vanden Acker, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Annulment of the Commission’s decision of 1 April 2001 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the procurement procedure relating to the conclusion of a contract for maintenance of HVAC, sprinkler and water and sanitary installations at the Joseph-Bech Building in Luxembourg and awarding the contract to another tenderer (OJ 2010/S 241 367523)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders A+P Kieffer Omnitec Sàrl to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.