CELEX: 
Language: en
Date: 1976-02-25 00:00:00
Title: Commission Decision of 12 February 1976 fixing the maximum export refund for barley under the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EEC) No 3336/75

25. 2. 76                                Official Journal of the European Communities                          No L 49/29
                                                    COMMISSION DECISION
                                                       of 12 February 1976
               fixing the maximum export refund for barley under the invitation to tender
                                            issued in Regulation (EEC) No 3336/75
                                                            (76/244/EEC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN                                       whereas Article 10(2) of Regulation (EEC) No
COMMUNITIES,                                                         3336/75 stipulates that the award is made to any
                                                                     tenderer whose tender indicates a rate of refund equal
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European                to or less than such maximum export refund and to
Economic Community,                                                  any tenderer who has tendered for an export levy ;
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No                         Whereas it follows from applying these rules to the
2727/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organiza­                   present situation on the market for the cereal in ques­
tion of the market in cereals (J), as amended by Regula­             tion that the maximum export refund should be fixed
tion (EEC) No 3058/75 (2),                                           as shown in Article 1 ; whereas the tonnage of barley
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No                         to which this maximum applies is 181 300 metric
2746/75 of 29 October 1975 laying down general                       tons ;
rules for granting export refunds on cereals and                     Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision
criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds (3), and              are in accordance with the opinion of the Manage­
in particular Article 5 thereof,                                     ment Committee for Cereals,
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No
3336/75 of 22 December 1975 on an invitation to                      HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :
tender for the levy and/or the refund for the export of
barley to the countries of Zones I, II, III, IV and                                         Article 1
VI (4), and in particular Article 10(1 ) thereof,
Whereas an invitation to tender for the export levy                  The maximum export refund for barley fixed on the
and/or refund on barley was issued under Regulation                  basis of tenders submitted for 12 February 1976 is
(EEC) No 3336/75 ; whereas the notice of invitation to               hereby fixed at 34-90 units of account per metric ton.
tender (5) associated with this Regulation specified that
                                                                                            Article 2
the total tonnage for which the export levy and/or
refund could be fixed was approximately 325 000                      This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
metric tons ;
Whereas Article 10(1 ) of Regulation (EEC) No
3336/75 allows the Commission, in accordance with                    Done at Brussels, 12 February 1976.
the procedure laid down in Article 26 of Regulation
                                                                                              For the Commission
(EEC) No 2727/75, to fix a maximum export refund ;
vhereas, when this maximum refund is being fixed,                                                P.J. LARDINOIS
account mi\st be taken of the criteria set out in Arti­
cles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2746/75 ;                                             Member of the Commission
(!) OJ  No  L 281 , 1 . 11 . 1975, p. 1 .
(2) OJ  No  L 306,  26. 11 . 1975, p. 3 .
(3) OJ  No  L 281 , 1 . 11 . 1975, p. 78 .
(4) OJ  No L  329,  23 . 12. 1975, p. 20.
(5) OJ  No C  295,  23 . 12. 1975, p. 6.