CELEX: 62019TB0833
Language: en
Date: 2020-10-22 00:00:00
Title: Case T-833/19: Order of the General Court of 22 October 2020 — Grammer v EUIPO (Representation of a geometric figure) (Action for annulment — EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a geometric figure — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

25.1.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 28/51
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 22 October 2020 — Grammer v EUIPO (Representation of a geometric figure)
      (Case T-833/19) (1)
      
      (Action for annulment - EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a geometric figure - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
      (2021/C 28/78)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Grammer AG (Ursensollen, Germany) (represented by: J. Bühling and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 September 2019 (Case R 1478/2019-2), relating to the application for registration of a figurative sign representing a geometric figure as a European Union trade mark.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1)
               
               
                  The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
               
            
                  2)
               
               
                  Grammer AG shall pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 45, 10.2.2020.