CELEX: 62009CO0374
Language: en
Date: 2010-03-04 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 March 2010. # Constantin Hârsulescu v Roumanie. # Appeal - Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court to examine an action seeking annulment of decisions of national courts, compensation for damage caused by national authorities and a declaration that those authorities have failed to act - Appeal manifestly unfounded. # Case C-374/09 P.

Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 March 2010 – Hârsulescu v Romania
      (Case C-374/09 P)
      Appeal – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court to examine an action seeking annulment of decisions of national courts, compensation
         for damage caused by national authorities and a declaration that those authorities have failed to act – Appeal manifestly unfounded
      
      Procedure – Action brought by a natural or legal person for annulment of decisions of national courts, compensation for damage caused
         by national authorities and a declaration that those authorities have failed to act – Community judicature manifestly lacking jurisdiction (Art. 225 EC et seq. and Art. 140a EA et seq.; Statute of the Court
         of Justice, Art. 51; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 119) (see paras 7-9, 12)
      
      Re:
      
         Appeal against the order of the Court of First Instance (Sixth Chamber) of 22 July 2009 in Case T-234/09 
               Hârsulescu
                v 
               Romania
                in which the Court of First Instance held that it had no jurisdiction to consider the applicant’s action for the annulment
                  of two judgments given by national courts and for damages – Challenge to the method of calculating retirement pension rights
                  – Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court.
               
            Operative part:
      
         
                  1.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	The appeal is dismissed.
               
            
         
                  2.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Mr Hârsulescu is ordered to pay the costs.