CELEX: C2005/006/64
Language: en
Date: 2005-01-08 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 28 October 2004 in Case T-35/01: Shanghai Teraoka Electronic Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (Dumping — Imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties — Electronic weighing scales originating in China — Undertaking with market economy status — Determination of injury — Causal link — Rights of the defence)

8.1.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 6/33
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 28 October 2004
   in Case T-35/01: Shanghai Teraoka Electronic Co. Ltd v Council of the European Union (1)
   
   (Dumping - Imposition of definitive anti-dumping duties - Electronic weighing scales originating in China - Undertaking with market economy status - Determination of injury - Causal link - Rights of the defence)
   (2005/C 6/64)
   Language of the case: English
   In Case T-35/01: Shanghai Teraoka Electronic Co. Ltd, established in Shanghai (China), represented by P. Waer, lawyer, against the Council of the European Union (Agent: S. Marquardt, assisted initially by G. Berrisch and P. Nehl and subsequently by G. Berrisch, lawyers) supported by the Commission of the European Communities, (Agents: V. Kreuschitz, S. Meany and T. Scharf, with an address for service in Luxembourg — action for annulment of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 2605/2000 of 27 November 2000 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of certain electronic weighing scales originating in China, South Korea and Taiwan (OJ 2000 L 301, p. 42) — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of: V. Tiili, President, J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi, A.W.H. Meij and M. Vilaras, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 28 October 2004, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 118 of 21.4.2001.