CELEX: C2007/082/15
Language: en
Date: 2007-04-14 00:00:00
Title: Case C-12/05 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2006 — Herbert Meister v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Employment — Reassignment of a head of service as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

14.4.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 82/8
            
         Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 14 December 2006 — Herbert Meister v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   (Case C-12/05 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Employment - Reassignment of a head of service as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
   (2007/C 82/15)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Appellant: Herbert Meister (represented by: P. Goergen, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, Agent)
   Re:
   Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 28 October 2004 in Case T-76/03 Meister v OHIM, in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action for annulment of OHIM's decision of 22 April 2002 appointing the appellant, in the interest of the service, with his post, as legal adviser to the Vice-President for Legal Affairs
   Operative part of the order
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Meister is ordered to pay the costs of the appeal;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) is ordered to pay the costs of the cross-appeal.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 93, 16.4.2005.