CELEX: 62020CB0220
Language: en
Date: 2020-12-10 00:00:00
Title: Case C-220/20: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Lanciano — Italy) — XX v OO (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — State of national health emergency — Continuity of judicial activity — Postponement of hearings — Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the reference for a preliminary ruling — Manifest inadmissibility)

8.3.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 79/17
            
         
      Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Lanciano — Italy) — XX v OO
      (Case C-220/20) (1)
      
      (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State of national health emergency - Continuity of judicial activity - Postponement of hearings - Lack of sufficient details concerning the factual and regulatory context of the main proceedings and the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the reference for a preliminary ruling - Manifest inadmissibility)
      (2021/C 79/21)
      Language of the case: Italian
      
         Referring court
      
      Ufficio del Giudice di Pace di Lanciano — Italy
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: XX
      
         Defendant: OO
      
         Interveners: WW, XC, VS
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      The request for a preliminary ruling brought by the Giudice di pace di Lanciano (Justice of the Peace of Lanciano, Italy) by decision of 18 May 2020 is manifestly inadmissible.
      
         (1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2020.