CELEX: 62013CB0488
Language: en
Date: 2014-09-09 00:00:00
Title: Case C-488/13: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte — Bulgaria) — ‘Parva Investitsionna Banka’ AD, ‘UniKredit Bulbank’ AD, ‘Siyk Faundeyshan’ LLS v ‘Ear Proparti Development — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD, Sindik na ‘Ear Proparti Development — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 — Definition of ‘uncontested pecuniary claims’ — Insolvency proceedings — Extra-judicial enforcement order relating to a contested claim — Claim for payment out of the insolvency estate, on the basis of such an enforcement order — Situation falling outside the scope of Regulation No 1896/2006 — Court clearly lacking jurisdiction)

1.12.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 431/5
            
         Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte — Bulgaria) — ‘Parva Investitsionna Banka’ AD, ‘UniKredit Bulbank’ AD, ‘Siyk Faundeyshan’ LLS v ‘Ear Proparti Development — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD, Sindik na ‘Ear Proparti Development — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD
   (Case C-488/13) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 - Definition of ‘uncontested pecuniary claims’ - Insolvency proceedings - Extra-judicial enforcement order relating to a contested claim - Claim for payment out of the insolvency estate, on the basis of such an enforcement order - Situation falling outside the scope of Regulation No 1896/2006 - Court clearly lacking jurisdiction))
   (2014/C 431/09)
   Language of the case: Bulgarian
   
      Referring court
   
   Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicants:‘Parva Investitsionna Banka’ AD, ‘UniKredit Bulbank’ AD, ‘Siyk Faundeyshan’ LLS
   
      Defendants:‘Ear Proparti Developmant — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD, Sindik na ‘Ear Proparti Developmant — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD
   
      Intervening parties: Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite, ‘Aset Menidzhmant’ EAD, ‘Ol Siyz Balgaria’ OOD, ‘Si Dzhi Ef — aktsionerna obshtnost’ AD, ‘Silvar Biych’ EAD, ‘Rudersdal’ EOOD, ‘Kota Enerdzhi’ EAD, Chavdar Angelov Angelov
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte (Bulgaria).
   
      (1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.