CELEX: 62021TN0276
Language: en
Date: 2021-05-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-276/21: Action brought on 20 May 2021 — Moio v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (moio.care)

12.7.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 278/58
            
         
      Action brought on 20 May 2021 — Moio v EUIPO — Paul Hartmann (moio.care)
      (Case T-276/21)
      (2021/C 278/79)
      Language in which the application was lodged: German
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Moio GmbH (Fürth, Germany) (represented by: E. Grande García, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Paul Hartmann AG (Heidenheim, Germany)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
      
         Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark moio.care — Application for registration No 17 938 097
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 March 2021 in Case R 1034/2020-4
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision, in so far as it adversely affects the applicant;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  in the alternative, annul the contested decision, in so far as a likelihood of confusion under Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council was established in relation to the earlier EU mark No 16 395 055, ‘Molicare’;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  in the further alternative, annul the contested decision, in so far as a likelihood of confusion was established for the goods claimed in Class 5 and the goods Data processing equipment; Peripheral devices for data reproduction; Mobile apps; Mobile data receivers; Mobile data communications apparatus; Transmitters [telecommunication]; Sensory software; Telecommunications software in Class 9;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order EUIPO to pay the costs.
               
            
         Plea in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.