CELEX: 62016CB0464
Language: en
Date: 2017-04-06 00:00:00
Title: Case C-464/16 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2017 — Pénzügyi Ismeretterjesztő és Érdek-képviseleti Egyesület (PITEE) v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Request for access to Commission documents — Refusal — Action for annulment — Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union — Representation before the EU Courts — Lawyer who is not a third party in relation to the appellant — Action manifestly inadmissible — Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

19.6.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 195/6
            
         Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 6 April 2017 — Pénzügyi Ismeretterjesztő és Érdek-képviseleti Egyesület (PITEE) v European Commission
   (Case C-464/16 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Request for access to Commission documents - Refusal - Action for annulment - Article 19 of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union - Representation before the EU Courts - Lawyer who is not a third party in relation to the appellant - Action manifestly inadmissible - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))
   (2017/C 195/07)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Pénzügyi Ismeretterjesztő és Érdek-képviseleti Egyesület (PITEE) (represented by: D. Lazar, Rechtsanwalt)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: H. Krämer and F. Erlbacher, acting as Agents)
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Pénzügyi Ismeretterjesztő és Érdek-képviseleti Egyesület (PITEE) shall pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.