CELEX: 62012TN0239
Language: en
Date: 2012-05-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-239/12: Action brought on 30 May 2012 — Jyoti Ceramic Industries v OHIM — DeguDent (ZIECON)

14.7.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 209/13
            
         Action brought on 30 May 2012 — Jyoti Ceramic Industries v OHIM — DeguDent (ZIECON)
   (Case T-239/12)
   2012/C 209/22
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Jyoti Ceramic Industries PVT. Ltd (Nashik, India) (represented by: R. Egerer, D. Jochim and A. Kolb, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DeguDent GmbH (Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 March 2012 in Case R 2546/2010-1;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: Jyoti Ceramic Industries
   
      Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘ZIECON’ for goods in Classes 5, 10 and 40 (application No 8 272 271)
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: DeguDent GmbH
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: Word mark ‘CERCON’ for goods in Classes 5, 9 and 10
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition rejected
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal allowed and registration refused
   Pleas in law:
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rules 50(1) and 19(1) and (3) of the implementing regulation