CELEX: 62013TA0434
Language: en
Date: 2016-01-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-434/13: Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Doux v Commission (Agriculture — Export refund — Poultry meat — Implementing Regulation fixing the refund at EUR 0 — Action for annulment — Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures — Direct concern — Admissibility — Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 164(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 — Legitimate expectations)

29.2.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 78/16
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 14 January 2016 — Doux v Commission
   (Case T-434/13) (1)
   
   ((Agriculture - Export refund - Poultry meat - Implementing Regulation fixing the refund at EUR 0 - Action for annulment - Regulatory act not entailing implementing measures - Direct concern - Admissibility - Article 3(3) of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 164(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 - Legitimate expectations))
   (2016/C 078/24)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Doux SA (Châteaulin, France) (represented by: J. Vogel, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and K. Skelly, acting as Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the applicant: Tilly-Sabco (Guerlesquin, France) (represented by: R. Milchior, F. Le Roquais and S. Charbonnel, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 of 18 July 2013 fixing the export refunds on poultry meat (OJ 2013 L 196, p. 13).
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1)
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2)
            
            
               Orders Doux SA to bear its own costs and those incurred by the European Commission;
            
         
               3)
            
            
               Orders Tilly-Sabco to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 291, 5.10.2013.