CELEX: 62005TA0375
Language: en
Date: 2008-10-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-375/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 October 2008 — Le Canne v Commission (Agriculture — Community financial assistance — Financial irregularity vitiating the request for payment of the balance — Decision to reduce the assistance — Expiry of the limitation period — Action for annulment and damages)

6.12.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 313/28
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 October 2008 — Le Canne v Commission
   (Case T-375/05) (1)
   
   (Agriculture - Community financial assistance - Financial irregularity vitiating the request for payment of the balance - Decision to reduce the assistance - Expiry of the limitation period - Action for annulment and damages)
   (2008/C 313/48)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Azienda Agricola ‘Le Canne’ Srl (Rovigo, Italy) (represented by: G. Carraro and F. Mazzonetto, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Cattabriga and L. Visaggio, Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
   Re:
   Application to annul Decision C(2005) 2939 of 26 July 2005 reducing the outstanding balance of Community financial assistance granted to the application for the modernisation and renovation of its fish farm facilities and an application for compensation for harm arising from that reduction.
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls Commission Decision C(2005) 2939 of 26 July 2005 in so far as it reduces the Community financial assistance granted to Azienda Agricola ‘Le Canne’ Srl for project IT/0016/90/02 on account of the imputation to the eligible expenditure to that assistance of the profit made by Giradello SpA for the performance of works related to that project.;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Dismisses the action for damages
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the Commission to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.