CELEX: 62014CB0204
Language: en
Date: 2014-09-04 00:00:00
Title: Case C-204/14: Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tatabányai Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary)) — István Tivadar Szabó v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Tax debts accumulated by a commercial company — Director of that company could not be recruited to be a director of another company — Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Interpretation requested of provisions of EU law that are inapplicable — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court — Hypothetical questions — Manifest inadmissibility)

1.12.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 431/7
            
         Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tatabányai Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary)) — István Tivadar Szabó v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága
   (Case C-204/14) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Tax debts accumulated by a commercial company - Director of that company could not be recruited to be a director of another company - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Interpretation requested of provisions of EU law that are inapplicable - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court - Hypothetical questions - Manifest inadmissibility))
   (2014/C 431/12)
   Language of the case: Hungarian
   
      Referring court
   
   Tatabányai Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: István Tivadar Szabó
   
      Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Közép-dunántúli Regionális Adó Főigazgatósága
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to provide an answer to the third question posed by the Tatabányai Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság (Hungary).
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The other questions posed by the aforementioned court are manifestly inadmissible.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 245, 28.7.2014.