CELEX: 62009TN0302
Language: en
Date: 2009-07-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-302/09: Action brought on 30 July 2009 — CNIPT v Commission

10.10.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 244/10
            
         Action brought on 30 July 2009 — CNIPT v Commission
   (Case T-302/09)
   2009/C 244/16
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Comité national interprofessionnel de la pomme de terre (CNIPT) (Paris, France) (represented by: V. Ledoux and B. Néouze, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision in its entirety;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Commission to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   By the present action, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2008) 7846 final (1) of 10 December 2008, by which the Commission held that the framework system of actions able to be undertaken by the French agricultural interprofessional organisations, consisting of aid for technical assistance, for production and marketing of high-quality agricultural products, for research and development and for advertising in favour of primary producers and undertakings active in the processing and marketing of agricultural products, financed by voluntary levies made compulsory by interministerial order (‘CVLs’) to be taken from the members of those interprofessional organisations constitutes State aid compatible with the common market.
   The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the applicant are essentially identical or similar to those raised in Case T-293/09 CNIEL v Commission.
   In addition, the applicant submits that there is a breach of the principle of non-discrimination, since the Commission dealt in generally and in the same way with a number of distinct CVL schemes.
   
      (1)  OJ 2009 C 116, p. 14.