CELEX: 62017TB0784(02)
Language: en
Date: 2019-03-12 00:00:00
Title: Case T-784/17: Order of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Strabag Belgium v Parliament (Action for annulment — Public works contracts — Tender procedure — General contractor works for European Parliament buildings in Brussels — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers — Replacement of the contested measure in the course of the proceedings — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

6.5.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 155/43
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Strabag Belgium v Parliament
      (Case T-784/17) (1)
      
      (Action for annulment - Public works contracts - Tender procedure - General contractor works for European Parliament buildings in Brussels - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid and award of the contract to other tenderers - Replacement of the contested measure in the course of the proceedings - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
      (2019/C 155/52)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Strabag Belgium (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: initially by M. Schoups, K. Lemmens and M. Lahbib, and subsequently by M. Schoups and K. Lemmens, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Z. Nagy and B. Simon, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 24 November 2017 rejecting the applicant’s tender and awarding to five tenderers a framework contract involving general contractor works for Parliament buildings in Brussels (Belgium) (call for tenders 06D20/2017/M036) and, second, an order for the Parliament to produce various documents.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action;
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     The European Parliament is ordered to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures;
                  
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  
                     The head of claim requesting that the Parliament be ordered to pay ‘procedural compensation’ is rejected as inadmissible.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.