CELEX: 62010TA0072
Language: en
Date: 2011-10-26 00:00:00
Title: Case T-72/10: Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2011 — Intermark v OHIM — Natex International (NATY’S) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark NATY’S — Earlier Community figurative mark Naty — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Partial rejection of opposition)

3.12.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 355/18
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2011 — Intermark v OHIM — Natex International (NATY’S)
   (Case T-72/10) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark NATY’S - Earlier Community figurative mark Naty - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Partial rejection of opposition)
   2011/C 355/31
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Intermark Srl (Stei, Romania) (represented by: Á. László, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Mannucci, agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Natex International Trade SpA (Pioltello, Italy)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 December 2009 (Case R 953/2009-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Intermark Srl and Natex International Trade SpA.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Intermark Srl to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 113, 1.5.2010.