CELEX: 62007CA0306
Language: en
Date: 2008-12-18 00:00:00
Title: Case C-306/07: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret — Denmark) — Ruben Andersen v Kommunernes Landsforening, acting on behalf of Slagelse Kommune (formerly Skælskør Kommune) (Information to be provided to employees — Directive 91/533/EEC — Article 8(1) and (2) — Scope — Employees covered by a collective agreement — Concept of temporary contract or employment relationship )

21.2.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 44/13
            
         Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 18 December 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret — Denmark) — Ruben Andersen v Kommunernes Landsforening, acting on behalf of Slagelse Kommune (formerly Skælskør Kommune)
   (Case C-306/07) (1)
   
   (Information to be provided to employees - Directive 91/533/EEC - Article 8(1) and (2) - Scope - Employees ‘covered’ by a collective agreement - Concept of ‘temporary contract or employment relationship’)
   (2009/C 44/21)
   Language of the case: Danish
   Referring court
   Højesteret
   Parties to the main proceedings
   
      Applicant: Ruben Andersen
   
      Defendant: Kommunernes Landsforening, acting on behalf of Slagelse Kommune (formerly Skælskør Kommune)
   Re:
   Reference for a preliminary ruling — Højesteret — Interpretation of Article 8(1) and (2) of Council Directive 91/533/EEC of 14 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship (OJ 1991 L 288, p. 32) — Applicability of a collective agreement intended to transpose a directive to an employee who is not a member of one of the organisations which are party to that agreement — Rights of employees who believe themselves to be harmed by the failure to comply with the obligations under the directive
   Operative part of the judgment
   
               1.
            
            
               Article 8(1) of Council Directive 91/533/EEC of 14 October 1991 on an employer's obligation to inform employees of the conditions applicable to the contract or employment relationship must be interpreted as meaning that it does not prohibit national rules which provide that the terms of a collective agreement which is intended to transpose the provisions of the directive into national law are to apply to an employee even though he is not a member of an organisation which is a party to that agreement.;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The second paragraph of Article 8(2) of Council Directive 91/533 must be interpreted as meaning that it does not prevent an employee who is not a member of a union which is a party to a collective agreement governing his employment relationship being regarded as ‘covered by’ that agreement within the meaning of the abovementioned provision.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The words ‘a temporary contract or employment relationship’ in the second paragraph of Article 8(2) of Directive 91/533 are to be interpreted as referring to contracts and employment relationships entered into for a short period. If no norm has been laid down for that purpose in a Member State's rules, it is for the national courts to determine the duration in each case in the light of the specific characteristics of certain sectors or certain occupations or activities. That duration must, however, be fixed so as to provide effective protection of the rights conferred on workers by the directive.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 211, 8.9.2007.