CELEX: 62014FB0105
Language: en
Date: 2015-04-22 00:00:00
Title: Case F-105/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 22 April 2015 — ED v ENISA (Civil service — Temporary staff member — Selection procedure — Decision rejecting an application, during the pre-selection stage, following examination by a selection board — No complaint lodged within the time-limit laid down in the Staff Regulations against the decision rejecting the application — Request for information — Reply from the authority authorised to conclude employment contracts not including a review of the decision rejecting the application — Complaint lodged against that reply — Failure to comply with the pre-litigation procedure — Manifest inadmissibility — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure)

8.6.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 190/32
            
         Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 22 April 2015 — ED v ENISA
   (Case F-105/14) (1)
   
   ((Civil service - Temporary staff member - Selection procedure - Decision rejecting an application, during the pre-selection stage, following examination by a selection board - No complaint lodged within the time-limit laid down in the Staff Regulations against the decision rejecting the application - Request for information - Reply from the authority authorised to conclude employment contracts not including a review of the decision rejecting the application - Complaint lodged against that reply - Failure to comply with the pre-litigation procedure - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure))
   (2015/C 190/37)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: ED (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) (represented by: A. Ryan, acting as Agent, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Action for the annulment of the decision not to retain the applicant’s application for the post of ‘Legal Officer’ in response to Vacancy Notice ENISA-TA-AD-2013-05.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               ED shall bear her own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 7 of 12.1.2015, p. 53.