CELEX: 62021TN0087R(01)
Language: en
Date: 2021-05-10 00:00:00
Title: Corrigendum to notice in the Official Journal in Case T-87/21 (OJ C 110, 29.3.2021)

10.5.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 182/68
            
         
      Corrigendum to notice in the Official Journal in Case T-87/21
      (
            Official Journal of the European Union C 110 of 29 March 2021
         )
      (2021/C 182/92)
      On page 37, Case T-87/21, Condor Flugdienst v Commission should read as follows:
      
         
            
               ‘Action brought on 12 February 2021 — Condor Flugdienst v Commission
               (Case T-87/21)
                
               Language of the case: English
               
                  Parties
               
               
                  Applicant: Condor Flugdienst GmbH (Kelsterbach, Germany) (represented by: A. Israel, J. Lang and M. Negro, lawyers)
               
                  Defendant: European Commission
               
                  Form of order sought
               
               The applicant claims that the Court should:
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           annul the defendant’s decision of 25 June 2020 on State aid SA.57153 (2020/N) — Germany — COVID-19: Aid to Lufthansa (1), and
                        
                     
                           —
                        
                        
                           order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs.
                        
                     
                  Pleas in law and main arguments
               
               In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
               
                           1.
                        
                        
                           First plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed its obligation to initiate the formal investigation procedure under Article 108(2) TFEU.
                        
                     
                           2.
                        
                        
                           Second plea in law, alleging that the defendant committed a manifest error of assessment by holding that the aid to Lufthansa is compatible with the internal market under Article 107(3)(b) TFEU.
                        
                     
                           3.
                        
                        
                           Third plea in law, alleging that the defendant failed to fulfil its duty to state reasons.’
                        
                     
         
      
      
         (1)  OJ C 397, 20.11.2020, p. 2.