CELEX: 62018TA0466
Language: en
Date: 2019-05-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-466/18: Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Eurolamp v EUIPO (EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology) (EU trade mark — Application for EU figurative mark EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology — Absolute ground for refusal — No distinctive character — Mark consisting of an advertising slogan — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

8.7.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 230/44
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 14 May 2019 — Eurolamp v EUIPO (EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology)
      (Case T-466/18) (1)
      
      (EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Mark consisting of an advertising slogan - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
      (2019/C 230/55)
      Language of the case: Greek
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Eurolamp AVEE Eisagogis kai Emporias Lamptiron (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: A. Argyriadis, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: K. Markakis, acting as Agent)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 May 2018 (Case R 1359/2017-1), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign EUROLAMP pioneers in new technology as an EU trade mark.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     Dismisses the action;
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     Orders Eurolamp AVEE Eisagogis kai Emporias Lamptiron to pay the costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 341, 24.9.2018.