CELEX: C2000/079/59
Language: en
Date: 2000-03-18 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 8 December 1999 in Case T-79/99, Euro-Lex European Law Expertise GmbH against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs) (Community trade mark — Representation by a lawyer who is a manager of the applicant — Inadmissible)

C 79/26                EN                    Official Journal of the European Communities                                      18.3.2000
decision of the Commission of 10 October 1997 imposing on                      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
the applicant the disciplinary measure of downgrading him
from grade D 1, step 8, to grade D 2, step 8, for failure to fulfil                         of 23 November 1999
his obligations under the Staff Regulations — the Court of First
Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Garcı́a-Valdecasas,            in Case T-173/98: Unión de Pequeños Agricultores v
President, P. Lindh and J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar,                        Council of the European Union (1)
made an order on 24 November 1999, the operative part of
which is as follows:                                                                       (Manifestly inadmissible)
1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.                                                 (2000/C 79/58)
2. The parties shall bear their own costs.
                                                                                          (Language of the case: Spanish)
(1) OJ 1998 C 312.                                                      In Case T-173/98: Unión de Pequeños Agricultores, established
                                                                        in Madrid, represented by Javier Ledesma Bartret and José-Mar-
                                                                        ia Jiménez Laiglesia y de Oñate, of the Madrid Bar, with an
                                                                        address for service in Luxembourg at the address of Concep-
                                                                        ción Llasser Moyano, 22 Rue Wenkelhiel, Dalheim, against
                                                                        Council of the European Union (Agents: Ignacio Dı́ez Parra
                                                                        and Antonio Tanca) — application for annulment in part of
                                                                        Council Regulation (EC) No 1638/98 of 20 July 1998
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                              amending Regulation No 136/66/EEC on the establishment of
                                                                        a common organisation of the market in oils and fats (OJ
                                                                        1998 L 210, p. 32) — the Court of First Instance (Third
                      of 8 December 1999                                Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President, J. Azizi and
                                                                        M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 23 Nov-
in Case T-161/98: Henri de Compte v European Parlia-                    ember 1999, the operative part of which is as follows:
                              ment (1)
                                                                        1. The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
(Officials — Annulment of a disciplinary measure — Action               2. The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by
manifestly inadmissible — Action manifestly unfounded in                     the Council.
                                law)
                                                                        3. The Diputación Provincial de Jaén, the Junta de Comunidades de
                                                                             Castilla-La Mancha, the Consejo de Gobierno de la Comunidad
                         (2000/C 79/57)                                      Autónoma de Andalucı́a and the Commission shall bear their
                                                                             own costs.
                  (Language of the case: French)
                                                                        (1) OJ 1999 C 71.
In Case T-161/98: Henri de Compte, former official of the
European Parliament, residing in Longeville-lès-Metz (France),
represented by Henri Ferretti, of the Thionville Bar, with an
address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of André
Lutgen, 1 Rue J.-P. Brasseur, against European Parliament
(Agents: Manfred Peter, Yannis Pantalis and Denis Waelbroeck)                  ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
— application for annulment of the decision of the President
of the European Parliament of 18 January 1988 downgrading                                    of 8 December 1999
him from grade A 3, step 8, to grade A 7, step 6 — the Court
of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of V. Tiili,               in Case T-79/99, Euro-Lex European Law Expertise GmbH
President, R.M. Moura Ramos and P. Mengozzi, Judges;                    against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 8 December 1999, the                             Market (trade marks and designs) (1)
operative part of which is as follows:
                                                                        (Community trade mark — Representation by a lawyer who
1. The application is dismissed.                                                 is a manager of the applicant — Inadmissible)
2. The parties shall bear their own costs.                                                       (2000/C 79/59)
(1) OJ 1998 C 378.                                                                        (Language of the case: German)
                                                                        In Case T-79/99, Euro-Lex European Law Expertise GmbH,
                                                                        established in Emmerich (Germany), represented by Eckhard
 ---pagebreak--- 18.3.2000               EN                     Official Journal of the European Communities                                        C 79/27
Benkelberg, Rechtsanwalt, Emmerich and Kleve, with an                     2. There is no need to adjudicate on the Council’s application for
address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Faltz                    leave to intervene.
and Kremer, 6 Rue Heinrich Heine, against the Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs)            3. The parties shall bear their own costs.
(Agents: Detlef Schennen and Emmanuel Joly) — application
for annulment of the decision of the first Board of Appeal of             4. The Council, which has applied to intervene, shall bear its own
the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade                    costs.
marks and designs) of 26 January 1999 (Case R 14/1998-1),
notified to the applicant on 1 February 1999 — the Court of
First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung,                  (1) OJ 1999 C 160.
President, and A. Potocki and W.H. Meij, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, has made an order on 8 December 1999, the
operative part of which is as follows:
1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.
                                                                                ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
(1) OJ C 204 of 17.7.1999.                                                                        of 7 December 1999
                                                                          in Case T-108/99, Gemma Reggimenti v European Parlia-
                                                                                                        ment (1)
                                                                          (Officials — Actions — Time-limits — Public policy —
                                                                          Distinction between complaint and request under
                                                                          Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Rejection of
                                                                                     complaint — Late action — Inadmissible)
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                                     (2000/C 79/61)
                       of 1 December 1999
in Case T-81/99: Lily Karoline Schuerer v Commission of                                       (Language of the case: French)
                  the European Communities (1)
                                                                          In Case T-108/99, Gemma Reggimenti, official of the European
(Officials — Pensions — Weighting — Change of capital of                  Parliament, residing in Brussels, represented by Claudine
a Member State — Manifest inadmissibility — Action                        Junion, of the Brussels Bar, with an address for service in
                   manifestly unfounded in law)                           Luxembourg at the Chambers of Christine Nabozny, 3 Rue
                                                                          Mathias Tresch, against European Parliament (Agents: Hannu
                                                                          von Hertzen and Yannis Pantalis) — application for annulment
                           (2000/C 79/60)                                 of the decision of the European Parliament of 18 June 1998
                                                                          refusing the payment, on behalf of and in the name of the
                                                                          applicant, of family allowances, to which she is entitled in
                                                                          respect of her child, to third parties who have the child in their
                    (Language of the case: German)
                                                                          care, for the period from 29 August to 31 December 1997 —
                                                                          the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of
In Case T-81/99: Lily Karoline Schuerer, former official of the           K. Lenaerts, President, and J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges;
Commission of the European Communities, represented by                    H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 7 December 1999,
Hermann J. Winzen, Rechtsanwalt, Munich, with an address                  the operative part of which is as follows:
for service in Luxembourg at the address of Marco Steil, 12
rue d’Anvers, against Commission of the European Communi-                 1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
ties — application for compensation amounting to
DEM 17 677,57, together with interest — the Court of First                2. The parties shall bear their own costs.
Instance (Third Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President,
J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order
on 1 December 1999, the operative part of which is as follows:            (1) OJ C 226 of 7.8.1999.
1. The action is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and,
    for the rest, as manifestly unfounded in law.