CELEX: 62015TN0374
Language: en
Date: 2015-07-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-374/15: Action brought on 9 July 2015 — VM Vermögens-Management v OHIM — DAT Vermögensmanagement (Vermögensmanufaktur)

14.9.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 302/64
            
         Action brought on 9 July 2015 — VM Vermögens-Management v OHIM — DAT Vermögensmanagement (Vermögensmanufaktur)
   (Case T-374/15)
   (2015/C 302/80)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: VM Vermögens-Management GmbH (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde and P. Homann, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DAT Vermögensmanagement GmbH (Baldham, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Vermögensmanufaktur’ — Community trade mark No 8 770 042
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Invalidity proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 April 2015 in Case R 418/2014-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.