CELEX: 62017CA0175
Language: en
Date: 2018-09-26 00:00:00
Title: Case C-175/17: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — X v Belastingdienst/Toeslagen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection — Directive 2005/85/EC — Article 39 — Directive 2008/115/EC — Article 13 — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 18, Article 19(2) and Article 47 — Right to an effective remedy — Principle of non-refoulement — Decision rejecting an application for asylum and imposing an obligation to return — National legislation providing for a second level of jurisdiction — Automatic suspensory effect limited to the action at first instance)

12.11.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 408/19
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State — Netherlands) — X v Belastingdienst/Toeslagen
      (Case C-175/17) (1)
      
      ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common policy on asylum and subsidiary protection - Directive 2005/85/EC - Article 39 - Directive 2008/115/EC - Article 13 - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 18, Article 19(2) and Article 47 - Right to an effective remedy - Principle of non-refoulement - Decision rejecting an application for asylum and imposing an obligation to return - National legislation providing for a second level of jurisdiction - Automatic suspensory effect limited to the action at first instance))
      (2018/C 408/23)
      Language of the case: Dutch
      
         Referring court
      
      Raad van State — Netherlands
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: X
      
         Defendant: Belastingdienst/Toeslagen
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      Article 39 of Council Directive 2005/85/EC of 1 December 2005 on minimum standards on procedures in Member States for granting and withdrawing refugee status, and Article 13 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, read in the light of Articles 18, 19(2) and 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which, whilst making provision for appeals against judgments delivered at first instance upholding a decision rejecting an application for international protection and imposing an obligation to return, does not confer on that remedy automatic suspensory effect even in the case where the person concerned invokes a serious risk of infringement of the principle of non-refoulement.
      
         (1)  OJ C 178, 6.6.2017.