CELEX: C2006/074/34
Language: en
Date: 2006-03-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-364/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of  26 January 2006  — Medici Grimm v Council (Dumping — Imports of leather handbags originating in the People's Republic of China — Amendment of a regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty — No retroactive effect — Annulment by the Court of First Instance — Action for damages — Sufficiently serious breach)

25.3.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 74/17
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 26 January 2006 — Medici Grimm v Council
   (Case T-364/03) (1)
   
   (Dumping - Imports of leather handbags originating in the People's Republic of China - Amendment of a regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty - No retroactive effect - Annulment by the Court of First Instance - Action for damages - Sufficiently serious breach)
   (2006/C 74/34)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Medici Grimm KG (Rodgau Hainhausen, Germany) (represented by: R. MacLean, Solicitor, and E. Gybels, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bishop, Agent, assisted by G. Berrisch, lawyer)
   
      Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: N. Khan and T. Scharf, Agents)
   Application for
   compensation under Article 235 EC and the second paragraph of Article 288 EC for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the absence of retroactive effect of Council Regulation (EC) No 2380/98 of 3 November 1998, amending Regulation (EC) No 1567/97 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of leather handbags originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ 1997 L 296, p. 1), partially annulled by the judgment in Case T-7/99 Medici Grimm v Council [2000] ECR II-2671
   Operative part of the judgment
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The applicant shall bear, in addition to its own costs, the costs incurred by the Council;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The Commission shall bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 21, 24.1.2004.