CELEX: 62015TO0718(03)
Language: en
Date: 2018-04-27 00:00:00
Title: Rectification order of 27 April 2018.#PTC Therapeutics International Ltd v European Medicines Agency.#Rectification.#Case T-718/15.

ORDER OF THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber)
      27 April 2018 (
            *1
         )
      (Rectification)
      In Case T‑718/15,
      
         PTC Therapeutics International Ltd, established in Dublin (Ireland), represented initially by C. Thomas, Barrister, G. Castle, B. Kelly, H. Billson, Solicitors, and M. Demetriou QC, and subsequently by C. Thomas, M. Demetriou, G. Castle and B. Kelly,
      applicant,
      supported by
      
         European Confederation of Pharmaceutical Entrepreneurs (Eucope), represented by D. Scannell, Barrister, and S. Cowlishaw, Solicitor,
      intervener,
      
         European Medicines Agency (EMA), represented by T. Jablónski, A. Spina, S. Marino, A. Rusanov and N. Rampal Olmedo, acting as Agents,
      defendant,
      ACTION under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Decision EMA/722323/2015 of the EMA of 25 November 2015, granting to a third party, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to a document containing information submitted in the context of an application for marketing authorisation for the medicinal product Translarna,
      THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber),
      composed of M. Prek, President, F. Schalin (Rapporteur) and M. J. Costeira, Judges,
      Registrar: E. Coulon,
      makes the following
      
         Order
      
      
               1
            
            
               The Court delivered a judgment on 5 February 2018.
            
         
               2
            
            
               In accordance with Article 164(1) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court, it is necessary to rectify, in the version in the language of the case, clerical mistakes or errors in calculation or obvious inaccuracies found in paragraph 51 of that judgment.
            
          
            
               On those grounds,
               THE GENERAL COURT (Second Chamber)
               hereby orders:
            
          
               
                  
                     In paragraph 51 of the judgment, in the version in the language of the case, ‘… as was noted in paragraph 49 above, …’ must be read instead of ‘…as was noted in paragraph Error!Reference source not found. above,…’.
                  
               
             
               
                  
                     Luxembourg, 27 April 2018
                     
                        
                           E. Coulon
                           Registrar
                        
                        
                           M. Prek
                           President
                        
                     
                  
               
            (
            *1
         )	Language of the case: English.