CELEX: 52005PC0162
Language: en
Date: 2005-04-26
Title: Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the provisional prohibition of the use and sale in France of genetically modified hybrid swede rape (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera Metzg. MS1Bn x RF1Bn) pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC

Important legal notice

|

52005PC0162

Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the provisional prohibition of the use and sale in France of genetically modified hybrid swede rape (Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera Metzg. MS1Bn x RF1Bn) pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC  /* COM/2005/0162 final */  

	Brussels, 26.4.2005COM(2005) 162 finalProposal for aCOUNCIL DECISIONconcerning the provisional prohibition of the use and sale in France of genetically modified hybrid swede rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera Metzg. MS1Bn x RF1Bn) pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC(presented by the Commission)EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1. C oncerning the placing on the market of genetically modified hybrid swede rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera Metzg. MS1Bn x RF1Bn), it has been decided by Commission Decision 96/158/EC of 6 February 1996, pursuant to Council Directive 90/220/EEC, that consent shall be given for the placing on the market of the product.2. On 28 February 1996 the authorities of the United Kingdom granted consent for the placing on the market of that product.3. Pursuant to Article 35(1) of Directive 2001/18/EC which replaced Directive 90/220/EEC procedures in respect of notifications concerning the placing on the market of genetically modified organisms which have not been completed by 17 October 2002 are subject to the provisions of Directive 2001/18/EC.4. In accordance with Article 16 of Directive 90/220/EEC, the French authorities informed the Commission on 20 November 1998 of their decision to provisionally prohibit the use and sale of the genetically modified hybrid swede rape in question for two years and gave reasons therefore. This measure has been renewed on 26 July 2001.5. The Scientific Committee on Plants considered that the information submitted by France did not constitute new relevant scientific evidence to indicate that the placing on the market of the product would cause adverse effects on human health and the environment.6. On 6 October 2003 and 27 August 2004 France informed the Commission of its decision to renew the above mentioned prohibition measure for one year and until 17 October 2006 respectively and of reasons therefore with reference to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC.7. On 5 March 2004 Greece submitted to the Commission additional information in support of its national measures concerning spring swede rape derived from transformation event Topas 19/2 having direct implications on the scientific assessment of the current national measures taken by France with respect to hybrid swede rape MS1Bn x RF1Bn.8. The European Food Safety Authority considered that the information submitted by Greece did not constitute new scientific evidence which would invalidate the environmental risk assessment of spring swede rape derived from transformation event Topas 19/2.9. Under such circumstances Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC requires the Commission to take a decision in accordance with the procedures laid down in Article 30(2) of the Directive to which Articles 5 and 7 of Decision 1999/468/EC shall apply, having regard to the provisions of Article 8 thereof.10. Since the Scientific Committee on Plants with respect to hybrid swede rape MS1Bn x RF1Bn as well as both the Scientific Committee on Plants and the EFSA with respect to spring swede rape Topas 19/2 considered that the products did not constitute a risk to human health or the environment and since the assessment of the spring swede rape has direct implications on the assessment of the hybrid swede rape, the Commission prepared a draft Decision asking France to repeal its measures concerning hybrid swede rape MS1Bn x RF1Bn.11. The draft Decision was submitted, in accordance with Article 5(2) of Decision 1999/468/EC, for opinion, to the Committee set up under Article 30 of Directive 2001/18/EC.12. No opinion was delivered by the Committee, following its consultation, on 29 November 2004, which requires that, the Commission, in accordance with Article 5(4) of Decision 1999/468/EC, shall, without delay, submit to the Council a proposal relating to the measures to be taken and shall inform the European Parliament.13. Article 5(6) of Decision 1999/468/EC provides that the Council may, where appropriate in view of any such position, act by qualified majority within a period set at three months in accordance with Article 30(2) of Directive 2001/18/EC. If within that three-month period, the Council has indicated by qualified majority that it opposes the proposal, the Commission shall re-examine it; whereas if, on expiry of that period the Council has neither adopted the proposed implementing act nor indicated its opposition, then the proposed implementing act shall be adopted by the Commission.Proposal for aCOUNCIL DECISIONconcerning the provisional prohibition of the use and sale in France of genetically modified hybrid swede rape ( Brassica napus L. ssp. oleifera Metzg. MS1Bn x RF1Bn) pursuant to Directive 2001/18/EC(Text with EEA relevance)(Only the French text is authentic)THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to Directive 2001/18/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC[1], and in particular Article 23(2) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas:(1) By Commission Decision 96/158/EC of 6 February 1996 concerning the placing on the market of a product consisting of a genetically modified organism, hybrid herbicide-tolerant swede rape seeds ( Brassica napus L. oleifera Metzg. MS1Bn x RF1Bn), pursuant to Council Directive 90/220/EEC[2] it has been decided that consent shall be given for the placing on the market of the product.(2) On 28 February 1996 the competent authorities of the United Kingdom granted consent for the placing on the market of that product.(3) Pursuant to Article 35(1) of Directive 2001/18/EC which replaced Directive 90/220/EEC[3] procedures in respect of notifications concerning the placing on the market of genetically modified organisms which have not been completed by 17 October 2002 are subject to the provisions of Directive 2001/18/EC.(4) On 20 November 1998 France informed the Commission of its decision to provisionally prohibit the use and sale of the genetically modified hybrid swede rape in question for two years and gave reasons therefore in accordance with Article 16(1) of Directive 90/220/EEC. This measure has been renewed on 26 July 2001.(5) The Scientific Committee on Plants considered that the information submitted by France did not constitute new relevant scientific evidence to indicate that the placing on the market of the product would cause adverse effects on human health and the environment.(6) On 6 October 2003 and 27 August 2004 France informed the Commission of its decision to renew the above mentioned prohibition measure for one year and until 17 October 2006 respectively[4],[5] and of reasons therefore with reference to Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC.(7) On 5 March 2004 Greece submitted to the Commission additional information in support of its national measures concerning spring swede rape derived from transformation event Topas 19/2 having direct implications on the scientific assessment of the current national measures taken by France.(8) The European Food Safety Authority considered that the information submitted by Greece did not constitute new scientific evidence which would invalidate the environmental risk assessment of spring swede rape derived from transformation event Topas 19/2.(9) Under the circumstances there is no reason to consider that the product hybrid swede rape MS1Bn x RF1Bn constitutes a risk to human health or the environment.(10) France should therefore repeal its measures.(11) No opinion was delivered by the Committee established under Article 30 of Directive 2001/18/EC on the measures laid down in a draft Commission Decision, following the Committee’s consultation, on 29 November 2004, in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 30(2) of that Directive,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1The measures taken by France to prohibit the use and sale of genetically modified hybrid swede rape authorized for placing on the market by Decision 96/158/EC are not justified under the provisions of Article 23 of Directive 2001/18/EC.Article 2France shall take the necessary steps to comply with this Decision at the latest 20 days after its notification.Article 3This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.Done at Brussels, […] 2005.For the CouncilThe President 

[1] OJ L 106, 17.4.2001, p. 1

[2] OJ L 37, 15.2.1996, p. 30

[3] OJ L 117, 8.5.1990, p. 15

[4] Arrêté du 25 juillet 2003 portant suspension de la mise sur le marché de colza génétiquement modifié au titre de l'article 23 de la directive 2001/18/CE, J.O. de la République française n° 187 du 14 août 2003, p. 14061

[5] Arrêté du 19 juillet 2004 portant suspension de la mise sur le marché de colza génétiquement modifié au titre de l'article 23 de la directive 2001/18/CE, J.O. de la République française n° 194 du 21 août 2004, p. 28