CELEX: 62017TB0447
Language: en
Date: 2018-12-13 00:00:00
Title: Case T-447/17: Order of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Bowles v ECB (Civil Service — ECB Staff — Appointment decision concerning the post of Adviser to the President and Coordinator of the Counsel to the Executive Board — No act adversely affecting the applicant — No interest in bringing proceedings — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

18.2.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 65/36
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Bowles v ECB
      (Case T-447/17) (1)
      
      ((Civil Service - ECB Staff - Appointment decision concerning the post of Adviser to the President and Coordinator of the Counsel to the Executive Board - No act adversely affecting the applicant - No interest in bringing proceedings - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
      (2019/C 65/45)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Carlos Bowles (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: B. Ehlers and F. Malfrère, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
      
         Re:
      
      Action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, the annulment (i) of the decision of the Executive Board of the ECB of 31 January 2017 to appoint M.S. to the post of Adviser to the President and Coordinator of the Counsel to the Executive Board (ii) of the decision not to appoint the applicant to that post and (iii) of the decision not to allow the applicant to apply for that post and, secondly, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The action is dismissed as being in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Mr Carlos Bowles shall pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 347, 16.10.2017.