CELEX: 62009TJ0382
Language: en
Date: 2011-09-09 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2011. # Ergo Versicherungsgruppe AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM). # Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ERGO - Prior Community and national word marks CERGO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Duty to rule on the entirety of the action - Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal - Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009. # Case T-382/09.

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 9 September 2011 – Ergo Versicherungsgruppe v OHIM – DeguDent (ERGO)
      (Case T-382/09)
      Community trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Application for Community word mark ERGO – Prior Community and national word marks CERGO – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Duty to rule on the entirety of the action – Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal – Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009
      Community trade mark – Definition and acquisition of the Community trade mark – Relative grounds for refusal – Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier identical or similar mark registered for identical or similar goods or services
         – Likelihood of confusion with the earlier mark (Council Regulation No 207/2009, Art. 8(1)(b)) (see paras 28, 61-62, 66)
      
      Re: 
      
         
               ACTION against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 July 2009 (Case R 44/2008‑4) concerning opposition
                  proceedings between DeguDent GmbH and Ergo Versicherungsgruppe AG.
               
            Operative part
      The Court:
      
         
                  1.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
                     Designs) (OHIM) of 23 July 2009 (Case R 44/2008‑4) in so far as the Board of Appeal omitted to rule on the action brought
                     before it as regards goods in Class 5;
                  
               
            
         
                  2.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Dismisses the remainder of the action;
               
            
         
                  3.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Orders Ergo Versicherungsgruppe AG, DeguDent Gmbh and OHIM each to bear their own costs.