CELEX: 62021TN0286
Language: en
Date: 2021-05-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-286/21: Action brought on 21 May 2021 — Pejovič v EUIPO — ETA živilska industrija (RENŠKI HRAM)

12.7.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 278/64
            
         
      Action brought on 21 May 2021 — Pejovič v EUIPO — ETA živilska industrija (RENŠKI HRAM)
      (Case T-286/21)
      (2021/C 278/87)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Edvin Pejovič (Pobegi, Slovenia) (represented by: U. Pogačnik, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ETA živilska industrija d.o.o. (Kamnik, Slovenia)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
      
         Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark RENŠKI HRAM — European Union trade mark No 15 297 302
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 March 2021 in Case R 679/2020-4
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  uphold the present application;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  reform the contested decision in such manner to uphold the applicant’s appeal and reform the decision issued in cancellation procedure No 26 907 C of 17 March 2020 in such manner, to uphold the application for a declaration of invalidity of the contested trade mark RENŠKI HRAM and to declare the contested trade mark invalid in its entirety;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  in the alternative, annul the contested decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  remit the case back to the EUIPO for further deliberation;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order EUIPO to pay all costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 63(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 46(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.