CELEX: 62013CA0513
Language: en
Date: 2014-12-04 00:00:00
Title: Case C-513/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 December 2014  — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission (Appeal — Cohesion Fund — Project concerning the drainage and purification of the urban water of Zaragoza (Spain) — Reduction in the financial assistance — Existence of a time-limit — Failure to comply with the prescribed time-limit — Consequences)

9.2.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 46/13
            
         Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 4 December 2014 — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission
   (Case C-513/13 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Cohesion Fund - Project concerning the drainage and purification of the urban water of Zaragoza (Spain) - Reduction in the financial assistance - Existence of a time-limit - Failure to comply with the prescribed time-limit - Consequences))
   (2015/C 046/17)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Rubio González, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Valero Jordana and A. Steiblytė, Agents)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-358/08 Spain v Commission;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Annuls Commission decision C(2008) 3249 of 25 June 2008, relating to a reduction of the aid granted by virtue of the Cohesion Fund to the Kingdom of Spain for project No 96/11/61/018 — ‘Saneamiento de Zaragoza’;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the Commission to pay the costs incurred by the Kingdom of Spain and declares that the Commission is to bear its own costs both in the proceedings at first instance and in the present appeal.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 336, 16.11.2013.