CELEX: C2006/331/89
Language: en
Date: 2006-12-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-225/02: Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2006 — Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Zaragoza v Commission (European Social Fund — Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 — Withdrawal of financial aid — Action for annulment — Directly concerned — Inadmissibility)

30.12.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 331/40
            
         Order of the Court of First Instance of 22 November 2006 — Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Zaragoza v Commission
   (Case T-225/02) (1)
   
   (European Social Fund - Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88 - Withdrawal of financial aid - Action for annulment - Directly concerned - Inadmissibility)
   (2006/C 331/89)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Zaragoza (Zaragoza, Speain) (represented by: initially A. Sánchez-Rubio García, then A. Creus Carreras and B. Uriarte Valiente, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: L. Escobar Guerrero and L. Flynn, Agents)
   Re:
   Action for annulment of Commission Decision C (2000) 2621 of 29 December 2000 relating to the withdrawal of aid which was allocated by the European Social Fund (ESF) by application of Decision C (91) 2852 of 19 December 1991 adopting the Community initiative ‘Euroform’ for Spain (P.O. 913051ES8) and ESF funds which the Spanish authorities allocated to the Cámara de Comercio e Industria (Chamber of Commerce), Zaragoza, for the ‘Tricoin’ project (ref.: EUR-82), for the implementation of which the company Copy Aragón de Zaragoza was responsible.
   Operative part of the order
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as inadmissible;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Cámara de Comercio e Industria de Zaragoza is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 233, 28.9.2002.