CELEX: 62016TN0652
Language: en
Date: 2016-09-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-652/16 P: Appeal brought on 16 September 2016 by HD against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016 in Case F-136/15, HD v Parliament

14.11.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 419/51
            
         Appeal brought on 16 September 2016 by HD against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016 in Case F-136/15, HD v Parliament
   (Case T-652/16 P)
   (2016/C 419/68)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: HD (Aach, Germany) (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Parliament
   
      Form of order sought by the appellant
   
   The appellant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               declare the present appeal admissible;
            
         
               —
            
            
               set aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal of 21 July 2016, HD v Parliament (F-136/15);
            
         
               —
            
            
               grant the appellant’s claim for annulment made at first instance;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Parliament to pay the costs of both instances.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on two grounds.
   
               1.
            
            
               First ground of appeal, alleging distortion of the facts and evidence, manifest error of assessment and infringement of Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 December 2000 on the protection of individuals with regard to the processing of personal data by the Community institutions and bodies and on the free movement of such data (OJ 2001, L 8, p. 1).
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second ground of appeal, alleging a failure to state reasons for the judgment under appeal.