CELEX: 52011PC0165
Language: en
Date: 2011-04-04
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China

|

52011PC0165

/* COM/2011/0165 final - NLE 2011/0071 */  Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China  

	[pic] | EUROPEAN COMMISSION |Brussels, 4.4.2011COM(2011) 165 final2011/0071 (NLE)Proposal for aCOUNCIL REGULATIONamending Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of ChinaEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUMCONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL-  Grounds for and objectives of the proposalThis proposal concerns the application of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community ('the basic Regulation') in the investigation of possible circumvention of the anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China.-  General contextThis proposal is made in the context of the implementation of the basic Regulation and is the result of an investigation which was carried out in line with the substantive and procedural requirements laid out in the basic Regulation and in particular Article 13 thereof.-  Existing provisions in the area of the proposalThe measures in force were imposed by Council Regulation (EU) No 1425/2006 of 25 September 2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of China.-  Consistency with other policies and objectives of the UnionNot applicable.CONSULTATION OF INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENT-  Consultation of interested partiesInterested parties concerned by the proceeding have had the possibility to defend their interests during the investigation, in line with the provisions of the basic Regulation.-  Collection and use of expertiseThere was no need for external expertise.-  Impact assessmentThis proposal is the result of the implementation of the basic Regulation.The basic Regulation does not contain provisions for a general impact assessment but contains an exhaustive list of conditions that have to be assessed.LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL-  Summary of the proposed actionOn 20 August 2010 the Commission published Regulation (EU) No 748/2010 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in the People's Republic of China by imports of certain plastic sacks and bags channelled via a Chinese company subject to a lower duty rate. The ex-officio initiation was based on sufficient prima facie evidence that the anti-dumping measures of the product concerned were being circumvented by means of reorganisation of patterns and channels of sales of the product concerned.The attached proposal for a Council Regulation is based on the findings of the investigation carried as well as on the facts available, according to Article 18 of the basic Regulation.The investigation confirmed that a change in the pattern of trade has taken place, in accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation.It is therefore proposed to extend the residual anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 to the company subject to the investigation.In addition, in order to enable a more detailed monitoring of the trade flows concerning the non-sampled companies henceforth, a TARIC additional code should be attributed to each non-sampled company listed in Annex I of Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006.It is therefore proposed that the Council adopt the attached proposal for a Regulation which should be published no later than 20 May 2011.-  Legal basisCouncil Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community, and in particular Article 13 thereof.-  Subsidiarity principleThe proposal falls under the exclusive competence of the European Union. The subsidiarity principle therefore does not apply.-  Proportionality principleThe proposal complies with the proportionality principle for the following reasons:The form of action is described in the above-mentioned basic Regulation and leaves no scope for national decision.Indication of how financial and administrative burden falling upon the Union, national governments, regional and local authorities, economic operators and citizens is minimized and proportionate to the objective of the proposal is not applicable.-  Choice of instrumentsProposed instruments: Regulation.Other means would not be adequate for the following reason:Other means would not be adequate because the basic Regulation does not provide for alternative options.BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONThe proposal has no implication for the Union budget.2011/0071 (NLE)Proposal for aCOUNCIL REGULATIONamending Council Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating, inter alia, in the People's Republic of ChinaTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (‘the basic Regulation’)[1], and in particular Articles 13(3), 14(3) and 14(5) thereof,Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the Advisory Committee,Whereas:1.  PROCEDURE2.  Existing measures3.  By Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006[2] (the original Regulation), the Council imposed definitive anti-dumping duties on imports into the Union of certain plastic sacks and bags, originating inter alia in the People's Republic of China (PRC). Given the large number of co-operating Chinese exporting producers, a sample of exporting producers was selected and individual duty rates ranging from 4,8% to 12,8% were imposed on companies included in the sample, while other co-operating companies not included in the sample and listed in Annex I to the original Regulation were attributed a duty rate of 8,4%. A duty rate of 28,8% ('residual duty rate') was imposed on Chinese companies which either did not make themselves known or did not co-operate with the investigation.4.  By Regulation (EC) No 189/2009[3] and in accordance with Article 2 of the original Regulation, three Chinese companies were added to the list of producers from the PRC listed in Annex I.5.  Ex-Officio Initiation6.  Prima facie evidence at the disposal of the Commission indicated that, following the imposition of measures, a change in the pattern of trade involving exports from the PRC to the Union took place for which there was insufficient due cause or justification other than the imposition of the duties in force. This change in the pattern of trade appeared to stem from exports to the Union of the product concerned produced by Chinese exporting producers subject to the residual duty rate through a Chinese exporting producer benefiting from a lower duty rate, namely the company Xiamen Xingxia Polymers Co., Ltd ("Xiamen") listed in Annex I to the original Regulation.7.  Furthermore, the evidence pointed to the fact that the remedial effects of the existing anti-dumping measures on the product concerned were being undermined in terms of prices. There was sufficient prima facie evidence that the imports of the product concerned were made at prices well below the non-injurious price established in the investigation that led to the existing measures.8.  Finally, the Commission had sufficient prima facie evidence at its disposal that the prices of the product concerned are dumped in relation to the normal value previously established.9.  Having determined, after consulting the Advisory Committee, that sufficient evidence existed for the initiation of an investigation pursuant to Article 13 of the basic Regulation, the Commission published, in the Official Journal of the European Union a Regulation (EU) No 748/2010[4] initiating an investigation of the alleged circumvention of the anti-dumping measures (the initiating Regulation). Pursuant to Art 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, the Commission, by the initiating Regulation, also directed the customs authorities to register imports of the product concerned declared as having been manufactured by Xiamen under the specific TARIC additional code A981 attributed to them in order to ensure that, should the investigation result in findings of circumvention, anti-dumping duties of an appropriate amount can be levied retroactively from the date of registration of such imports.10.  Investigation11.  The Commission officially advised the authorities of the PRC, Xiamen, as well as the companies allegedly having their products exported through Xiamen ('other exporting producers') of the initiation of the investigation and sent questionnaires. Interested parties were given the opportunity to make their views known in writing and to request a hearing within the time limit set in the initiating Regulation. Interested parties were also informed that non-cooperation might lead to the application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation and to findings being made on the basis of the facts available.12.  No replies were received from the other exporting producers and an incomplete reply was received from Xiamen.13.  Investigation period14.  The investigation period covered the period from 1 January 2009 to 30 June 2010 (the 'IP'). Data was collected for the period from January 2006 up to the end of the IP to investigate the alleged change in the pattern of trade and the other aspects set out in Article 13 of the basic Regulation.15.  RESULTS OF THE INVESTIGATION16.  General considerations/degree of co-operation/methodology17.  As explained in recital (8) above Xiamen submitted an incomplete partial questionnaire reply. The Commission's services sent a letter to Xiamen identifying the deficiencies of its questionnaire reply and requesting complete and coherent information to which Xiamen did not react. In addition, Xiamen refused a proposed verification of the data at its premises.18.  Consequently, Xiamen was informed that under these circumstances, the Commission considers the company as non-cooperating, in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation and that findings would be based on the facts available. Xiamen was also made aware that the result of the investigation might be less favourable than if it had fully co-operated. Xiamen did not react to this letter.19.  In view of the above and given that no statistical data were available to determine export volumes and prices at company level during the IP, findings in respect of the alleged circumvention had to be made on the basis of facts available in accordance with Article 18 of the basic Regulation namely based on the evidence received from Member States customs authorities and on the non-verified partial questionnaire reply submitted by Xiamen.20.  Product concerned21.  The product concerned is plastic sacks and bags, containing at least 20 % by weight of polyethylene and of sheeting of a thickness not exceeding 100 micrometers (μm), originating in the People’s Republic of China, currently falling within CN codes ex 3923 21 00, ex 3923 29 10 and ex 3923 29 90 (TARIC codes 3923 21 00 20, 3923 29 10 20, and 3923 29 90 20).22.  Change in the pattern of trade23.  In accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the assessment of the existence of circumvention was carried out by analysing whether there was a change in the pattern of trade between individual companies in the PRC and the Union, which stems from a practise, process or work for which there is insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of the duty, and where there is evidence of injury or that the remedial effects of the duty are being undermined in terms of the prices and/or quantities of the product concerned, and where there is evidence of dumping in relation to the normal values previously established for the like product.24.  Given that Eurostat data cannot be used to determine export volumes and prices at company level since only aggregated country wide data are provided and no other statistical data on company level are available, export volumes and prices reported by Xiamen in its partial questionnaire reply were used.25.  According to the information received from Xiamen, sales to the Union increased significantly after the imposition of measures in September 2006. For some periods, the exports doubled, compared to the sampling period used in the original investigation (1 April 2004 to 31 March 2005) and prices reported were below the average EU target price established during the original investigation.26.  Insufficient due cause or economic justification other than the imposition of anti-dumping duties27.  In addition to the increase in sales volume, it was noted that according to the information submitted in the original investigation for the sampling exercise, Xiamen declared that it had no related companies and no production outside its main factory. In its partial reply to the anti-circumvention questionnaire, Xiamen reported that during the IP it outsourced certain production steps, such as colour printing or bagging and that sometimes it sells raw materials to the contracting companies.28.  The partial questionnaire reply confirmed that the contracting companies mentioned by Xiamen are the other exporters which were, according to the prima facie evidence, allegedly channelling exports to the Union. However, the reply also revealed that it is not a matter of an outsourcing arrangement where the ownership of the raw material and the finished goods stay with the company giving the outsourcing order, but goes beyond for the following reasons.29.  In all cases reported as 'partly processed', payment by the European clients was reported as being made not to Xiamen but to the bank accounts of the two companies allegedly involved in channelling. These sales account for more than 20% of all EU sales in 2009. Moreover, the list of sales transactions submitted by Xiamen reveals diverse invoicing methodologies which differ in alphanumeric structure and length. With regard to sales reported as 'partly processed' via one of the two companies, representing the majority of those sales, it appears that the invoice number includes two letters referring to the company name of the company allegedly channelling. Moreover, the two companies are located around 1.000 km away from Xiamen, which puts into question the economic justification of such an arrangement.30.  In addition, it cannot be excluded that more sales than those identified in the detailed list of transaction submitted by Xiamen are affected by the alleged channelling as according to production and capacity statistics also submitted by Xiamen more than 40% of its production in 2007, 2008 and 2009 were declared as outsourced.31.  It was also noted that sales reported as 'partly processed' stopped in October 2009, i.e. after customs authorities of certain Member States refused the application of the individual anti-dumping duty rate of Xiamen to certain imports apparently produced by the other exporting producers.32.  The above leads therefore to the conclusion that a change in the pattern of trade has taken place following the imposition of measures on the product concerned for which there is no other due cause or economic justification other than the avoidance of the residual anti-dumping duty rate in force.33.  Undermining the remedial effect on injury of the anti-dumping duty34.  The increase of imports declared under the name of Xiamen was significant in terms of quantities. According to their questionnaire reply, Xiamen nearly doubled its sales to the EU in 2007 and 2008, compared to the sales reported during the original IP, which was mainly due to the involvement of the other exporting producers. The comparison of the average EU target price established during the original investigation and the weighted average export price reported during the IP shows underselling.35.  It is therefore concluded that the practice described above undermines the remedial effects on injury of the measures both in terms of quantities and prices.36.  Evidence of dumping37.  Finally, in accordance with Article 13(1) and (2) of the basic Regulation it was examined whether there was evidence of dumping in relation to the normal value previously established.38.  The comparison of the weighted average normal value as established during the original investigation (normal value from the analogue country Malaysia) and the weighted average export price during the current IP as reported by Xiamen in its partial questionnaire reply shows a dumping margin exceeding the dumping margin established during the original investigation for non-sampled companies.39.  MEASURES40.  Given the above, and in application of Article 18 of the basic Regulation, it was concluded that a change in the pattern of trade has taken place, in accordance with Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation. In accordance with the second sentence of Article 13(1) of the basic Regulation, the residual anti-dumping duty rate on imports of the product concerned originating in the PRC should therefore be extended to imports of the same product declared as having been manufactured by Xiamen. In practical terms, TARIC additional code A999 should be declared for those imports from the entry into force of this Regulation.41.  Furthermore, in order to enable a more detailed monitoring of the trade flows concerning the non-sampled companies henceforth, a TARIC additional code will be attributed to each non-sampled company listed in Annex I of the original Regulation.42.  In accordance with Articles 13(3) and 14(5) of the basic Regulation, which provide that any extended measure should apply to imports which entered the Union under registration imposed by the initiating Regulation, duties should be collected on those registered imports consigned from Xiamen.43.  DISCLOSURE44.  Interested parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on the basis of which the Council intended to extend the residual anti-dumping duty rate in force to Xiamen and were given the opportunity to comment and to be heard. No comments which were of a nature to change the above conclusions were received,HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:Article 145.  The definitive anti-dumping duty of 28,8% applicable to 'all other companies' imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 on imports of certain plastic sacks and bags originating in the People’s Republic of China is hereby extended to imports declared as having been manufactured by XIAMEN XINGXIA POLYMERS CO., LTD.46.  The table in Article 1 paragraph 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1425/2006 is replaced by the following table:Country | Company | AD duty rate (%) | TARIC additional code |The People’s Republic of China | Cedo (Shanghai) Limited and Cedo (Shanghai) Household Wrappings, Shanghai | 7,4 | A757 |Jinguan (Longhai) Plastics Packing Co., Ltd., Longhai | 5,1 | A758 |Sunway Kordis (Shanghai) Ltd. and Shanghai Sunway Polysell Ltd., Shanghai | 4,8 | A760 |Suzhou Guoxin Group Co., Ltd., Suzhou Guoxin Group Taicang Yihe Import & Export Co., Ltd., Taicang Dongyuan Plastic Co., Ltd. and Suzhou Guoxin Group Taicang Giant Packaging Co., Ltd., Taicang | 7,8 | A761 |Wuxi Jiayihe Packaging Co., Ltd. and Wuxi Bestpac Packaging Co., Ltd., Wuxi | 12,8 | A763 |Zhong Shan Qi Yu Plastic Products Co Ltd., Zhongshan | 5,7 | A764 |Huizhou Jun Yang Plastics Co,. Ltd., Huizhou | 4,8 | A765 |Xinhui Alida Polythene Limited, Xinhui | 4,3 | A854 |Companies listed in ANNEX I | 8,4 | See ANNEX I |All other companies | 28,8 | A999 |Thailand | King Pac Industrial Co., Ltd., Chonburi and Dpac Industrial Co., Ltd., Bangkok | 14,3 | A767 |Multibax Public Co., Ltd., Chonburi | 5,1 | A768 |Naraipak Co Ltd. and Narai Packaging (Thailand) Ltd., Bangkok | 10,4 | A769 |Sahachit Watana Plastic Industry Co., Ltd., Bangkok | 6,8 | A770 |Thai Plastic Bags Industries Co., Ltd., Nakornpathorn | 5,8 | A771 |Companies listed in ANNEX II | 7,9 | A772 |All other companies | 14,3 | A999 |47.  Annex I of Regulation (EC) no 1425/2006 is replaced by the text as set out in the Annex to this Regulation.Article 248.  The duty extended by Article 1 shall be collected on imports registered in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 748/2010.49.  The provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.Article 3Customs authorities are hereby directed to discontinue the registration of imports, established in accordance with Article 2 of Regulation (EU) No 748/2010 .Article 4This Regulation shall enter into force on the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union . However, Article 2 shall apply as of the date of entry into force of Regulation (EU) 748/2010.This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.Done at Brussels,For the CouncilThe PresidentANNEXANNEX I: Chinese cooperating exporting producers not sampledCompany | City | TARIC additional code |BAO XIANG PLASTIC BAG MANUFACTURING (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. | Shenzhen | B014 |BEIJING LIANBIN PLASTIC & PRINTING CO LTD | Beijing | B015 |CHANGLE BEIHAI PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Zhuliu | B016 |CHANGLE UNITE PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Changle | B017 |CHANGLE HUALONG PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO LTD | Changle | B018 |CHANGLE SANDELI PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO LTD | Changle | B019 |CHANGLE SHENGDA RUBBER PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Changle | B020 |CHANGZHOU HUAGUANG PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Wujin | B021 |CHEONG FAT PLASTIC BAGS (CHINA) PRINTING FACTORY | Shenzhen | B022 |CHUN HING PLASTIC PACKAGING MANUFACTORY LTD | Hong Kong | B023 |CHUN YIP PLASTICS (SHENZHEN) LIMITED | Shenzhen | B024 |CROWN POLYETHYLENE PRODUCTS (INT'L) LTD. | Hong Kong | B025 |DALIAN JINSHIDA PACKING PRODUCTS CO., LTD | Dalian | B026 |DONG GUAN HARBONA PLASTIC & METALS FACTORY CO., LTD. | Dongguan | B027 |DONGGUAN CHERRY PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL, LTD | Dongguan | B028 |DONGGUAN FIRSTWAY PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD | Dongguan | B029 |DONGGUAN MARUMAN PLASTIC PACKAGING COMPANY LIMITED | Dongguan | B030 |DONGGUAN NAN SING PLASTICS LIMITED | Dongguan | B031 |DONGGUAN NOZAWA PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO. LTD | Dongguan | B032 |DONGGUAN RUI LONG PLASTICS FACTORY | Dongguan | B033 |FOSHAN SHUNDE KANGFU PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Shunde | B034 |FU YUEN ENTERPRISES CO. | Hong Kong | B035 |GOLD MINE PLASTIC INDUSTRIAL LIMITED | Jiangmen | B036 |GOOD-IN HOLDINGS LTD. | Hong Kong | B037 |HANG LUNG PLASTIC FACTORY (SHENZHEN) LTD | Shenzhen | B038 |HUIYANG KANLUN POLYETHYLENE MANUFACTURE FACTORY | Huizhou | B039 |JIANGMEN CITY XIN HUI HENGLONG PLASTIC LTD. | Jiangmen | B040 |JIANGMEN TOPTYPE PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Jiangmen | B041 |JIANGMEN XINHUI FENGZE PLASTIC COMPANY LTD. | Jiangmen | B042 |JIANGYIN BRAND POLYTHENE PACKAGING CO., LTD. | Jiangyin | B043 |JINAN BAIHE PLASTIC CO., LTD | Jinan | B044 |JINAN CHANGWEI PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Jinan | B045 |JINAN CHENGLIN PLASTIC PRODUCTS COMPANY LTD. | Jinan | B046 |JINAN MINFENG PLASTIC CO., LTD. | Jinan | B047 |JINYANG PACKING PRODUCTS (WEIFANG) CO. LTD | Qingzhou | B048 |JUXIAN HUACHANG PLASTIC CO., LTD | Liuguanzhuang | B049 |JUXIAN HUAYANG PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD | Liuguanzhuang | B050 |KIN WAI POLY BAG PRINTING LTD. | Hong Kong | B051 |LAIZHOU JINYUAN PLASTICS INDUSTRY & TRADE CO., LTD. | Laizhou | B052 |LAIZHOU YUANXINYIE PLASTIC MACHINERY CO., LTD. | Laizhou | B053 |LICK SAN PLASTIC BAGS (SHENZHEN) CO., LTD. | Shenzhen | B054 |LINQU SHUNXING PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO. LTD. | Linqu | B055 |LONGKOU CITY LONGDAN PLASTIC CORPORATION LTD. | Longkou | B056 |NEW CARING PLASTIC MANUFACTORY LTD. | Jiangmen | B057 |NEW WAY POLYPAK DONGYING CO., LTD. | Dongying | B058 |NINGBO HUASEN PLASTHETICS CO., LTD. | Ningbo | B059 |NINGBO MARUMAN PACKAGING PRODUCT CO. LTD. | Ningbo | B060 |POLY POLYETHYLENE BAGS AND PRINTING CO. | Hong Kong | B061 |QINGDAO NEW LEFU PACKAGING CO., LTD. | Qingdao | B062 |QUANZHOU POLYWIN PACKAGING CO. LTD | Nanan | B063 |RALLY PLASTICS CO., LTD. ZHONGSHAN | Zhongshan | B064 |RIZHAO XINAO PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD | Liuguanzhuang | B065 |DONGGUAN SEA LAKE PLASTIC PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING CO., LTD. | Dongguan | B066 |SHANGHAI HANHUA PLASTIC PACKAGE PRODUCT CO., LTD. | Shanghai | B067 |SHANGHAI HUAYUE PACKAGING PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Shanghai | B068 |SHANGHAI LIQIANG PLASTICS INDUSTRY CO., LTD. | Zhangyan | B069 |SHANGHAI MINGYE PLASTICS GOODS COMPANY LIMITED | Shanghai | B070 |SHANGHAI QUTIAN TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT CO. LTD. | Shanghai | B071 |SHANTOU ULTRA DRAGON PLASTICS LTD. | Shantou | B072 |SHAOXING YUCI PLASTICS AND BAKELITE PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Shangyu | B073 |SHENG YOUNG INDUSTRIAL (ZHONGSHAN) CO., LTD. | Zhongshan | B074 |SUPREME DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED | Hong Kong | B075 |TAISHING PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. ZHONGSHAN | Zhongshan | B076 |TIANJIN MINGZE PLASTIC PACKAGING CO., LTD. | Tianjin | B077 |UNIVERSAL PLASTIC & METAL MANUFACTURING LIMITED | Hong Kong | B078 |WAI YUEN INDUSTRIAL AND DEVELOPMENT LTD | Hong Kong | B079 |WEIFANG DESHUN PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Changle | B080 |WEIFANG HENGSHENG RUBBER PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Changle | B081 |WEIFANG HONGYUAN PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Changle | B082 |WEIFANG HUASHENG PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Changle | B083 |WEIFANG KANGLE PLASTICS CO., LTD. | Changle | B084 |WEIFANG LIFA PLASTIC PACKING CO., LTD. | Weifang | B085 |WEIFANG XINLI PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Weifang | B086 |WEIFANG YUANHUA PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Weifang | B087 |WEIFANG YUJIE PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Weifang | B088 |WEIHAI WEIQUAN PLASTIC AND RUBBER PRODUCTS CO. LTD. | Weihai | B089 |WINNER BAGS PRODUCT COMPANY (SHENZHEN) LIMITED | Shenzhen | B090 |WUI HING PLASTIC BAGS PRINTING (SHENZHEN) COMPANY LIMITED | Shenzhen | B091 |XIAMEN EGRET PLASTICS CO., LTD. | Gaoqi | B092 |XIAMEN RICHIN PLASTIC CO., LTD | Xiamen | B093 |XIAMEN UNITED OVERSEA ENTERPRISES LTD. | Xiamen | B094 |XIAMEN XINGYATAI PLASTIC INDUSTRY CO. LTD. | Xiamen | B095 |XINTAI CHUNHUI MODIFIED PLASTIC CO., LTD | Xintai | B096 |YANTAI BAGMART PACKAGING CO., LTD. | Yantai | B097 |YANTAI LONGQUAN PLASTIC AND RUBBER PRODUCTS CO. LTD. | Yantai | B098 |YAU BONG POLYBAGS PRINTING CO., LTD. | Hong Kong | B099 |YINKOU FUCHANG PLASTIC PRODUCTS. CO., LTD. | Yingkou | B100 |YONGCHANG (CHANGLE) PLASTIC INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. | Weifang | B101 |ZHANGJIAGANG YUANHEYI PAPER & PLASTIC COLOR PRINTING & PACKING CO., LTD | Zhangjiagang | B102 |ZHONGSHAN DONGFENG HUNG WAI PLASTIC BAG MFY | Zhongshan | B103 |ZHONGSHAN HUANGPU TOWN LIHENG METAL & PLASTIC FACTORY | Zhongshan | B104 |ZHUHAI CHINTEC PACKING TECHNOLOGY ENTERPRISE CO. LTD | Zhuhai | B105 |ZIBO WEIJIA PLASTIC PRODUCTS CO., LTD. | Zibo | B106 |Xiamen Good Plastic Co., Ltd. | Xiamen | B109 |[1] OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 51.[2] OJ L 270, 29.9.2006, p. 4[3] OJ L 67, 12.3.2009, p. 5[4] OJ L 219, 20.8.2010, p. 1