CELEX: 62015TN0535
Language: en
Date: 2015-09-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-535/15: Action brought on 15 September 2015 — CBM v OHIM — ÏD Group (Fashion ID)

9.11.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 371/39
            
         Action brought on 15 September 2015 — CBM v OHIM — ÏD Group (Fashion ID)
   (Case T-535/15)
   (2015/C 371/40)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken, J. Bärenfänger, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ÏD Group (Roubaix, France)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Fashion ID’ — Application for registration No 10 638 658
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 July 2015 in Case R 2470/2014-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision as far as it upheld the decision of the Opposition Division to reject the CTM No 10 638 658 with regard to the opposed goods and services in Classes 9, 14, 18, 25 and 35;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the corresponding decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 28 July 2014 (Case B 2 038 399) as far as the Opposition Division upheld the opposition to reject the CTM No 10 638 658;
            
         
               —
            
            
               dismiss the Opposition dated 26 June 2012 against the CTM No 10 638 658 in its entirety;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      Plea(s) in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               The Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal failed to regard the long-standing case law of the General Court and of the Court of Justice according to which the overall impression of signs has to be compared, focusing on the contested CTM as a whole, instead of a comparison of single elements.