CELEX: E1996P0002
Language: en
Date: 1996-06-13 00:00:00
Title: Request for an advisory opinion by Inderøy herredsrett by decision of that court of 11 March 1996 in the case of Jørn Ulstein and Per Otto Røiseng v. Asbjørn Møller (Case E-2/96)

Avis juridique important

|

E1996P0002

Request for an advisory opinion by Inderøy herredsrett by decision of that court of 11 March 1996 in the case of Jørn Ulstein and Per Otto Røiseng v. Asbjørn Møller (Case E-2/96)  

Official Journal C 169 , 13/06/1996 P. 0015 - 0015

Request for an advisory opinion by Inderøy herredsrett by decision of that court of 11 March 1996 in the case of Jørn Ulstein and Per Otto Røiseng v. Asbjørn Møller (Case E-2/96) (96/C 169/10)A request has been made to the EFTA Court by decision of 11 March 1996 of Inderøy herredsrett (Inderøy County Court), Norway, which was received at the Court Registry on 29 March 1996, for an advisory opinion in the case of Jørn Ulstein and Per Otto Røiseng v. Asbjørn Møller, on the following questions:1. Is Council Directive 77/187/EEC to be interpreted in such a way that the expression 'transfer of an undertaking, business or part of a business` only covers situations where there is some form of contract between the transferor and the transferee?2. Is the abovementioned Council Directive to be interpreted in such a way that the expression quoted under point 1 above implies that the transferee must take over property or moveables from the transferor?3. Will it make any difference and, if so, how, for the interpretation of the abovementioned Council Directive if some, but not all employees of the transferor are employed by the transferee?4. Will it make any difference and, if so, how, for the interpretation of the abovementioned Council Directive if an assignment is awarded according to the rules governing tender and the provision of the service is limited in time?