CELEX: 62015TN0693
Language: en
Date: 2015-11-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-693/15: Action brought on 27 November 2015 — Clover Canyon v OHIM — Kaipa Sportswear (CLOVER CANYON)

1.2.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 38/68
            
         Action brought on 27 November 2015 — Clover Canyon v OHIM — Kaipa Sportswear (CLOVER CANYON)
   (Case T-693/15)
   (2016/C 038/92)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Clover Canyon, Inc. (Los Angeles, United States) (represented by: T. Schmitz, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kaipa Sportswear GmbH (Heilbronn, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘CLOVER CANYON’ — Application for registration No 1 120 485
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 August 2015 in Case R 3018/2014-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               impose the costs of the application on the Defendant including the costs of the appeal proceedings;
               or
            
         
               —
            
            
               impose the costs of the application on the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM including the costs of the appeal proceedings.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.