CELEX: C2005/143/06
Language: en
Date: 2005-06-11 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 April 2005 in Case C-25/03 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach v HE (Sixth VAT Directive — Construction of a dwelling by two spouses forming a community which does not itself perform an economic activity — Use of one room by one of the co-owners for business purposes — Status of taxable person — Right to deduct — Rules governing exercise of that right — Invoicing requirements)

11.6.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 143/7
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
   
   (Second Chamber)
   of 21 April 2005
   in Case C-25/03 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach v HE (1)
   
   (Sixth VAT Directive - Construction of a dwelling by two spouses forming a community which does not itself perform an economic activity - Use of one room by one of the co-owners for business purposes - Status of taxable person - Right to deduct - Rules governing exercise of that right - Invoicing requirements)
   (2005/C 143/06)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case C-25/03: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) made by decision of 29 August 2002, received at the Court on 23 January 2003, in the proceedings pending before that court between Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach and HE — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), G. Arestis and J. Klučka, Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General, K. Sztranc, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 21 April 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:
   Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, both in its original version and following amendment by Council Directive 91/680/EEC of 16 December 1991 supplementing the common system of value added tax and amending Directive 77/388/EEC with a view to the abolition of fiscal frontiers, is to be interpreted as follows:
   
               —
            
            
               where a person purchases a house, or has a house built, in order to live in it with his family he is acting as a taxable person, and is thus entitled to make deductions under Article 17 of the Sixth Directive in so far as he uses one room in that building as an office for the purposes of carrying out an economic activity, albeit an ancillary one, within the meaning of Articles 2 and 4 of the directive and allocates that part of the building to the assets of his business;
            
         
               —
            
            
               where a marital community which does not have legal personality and does not itself carry out an economic activity within the meaning of the Sixth Directive places an order for a capital item, the co-owners forming that community are to be regarded as recipients of the transaction for the purposes of the directive;
            
         
               —
            
            
               where spouses forming a community by marriage purchase a capital item, part of which is used exclusively for business purposes by one of the co-owning spouses, that spouse is entitled to deduct in respect of all the input value added tax attributable to the share of the item which he uses for the purposes of his business, in so far as the amount deducted does not exceed the limits of the taxable person's interest in the co-ownership of the item;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Articles 18(1)(a) and 22(3) of the Sixth Directive do not require the taxable person, in order to be able to exercise the right to deduct in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, to hold an invoice issued in his name and stating the proportions of the payments and value added tax corresponding to his interest in the property held in co-ownership. An invoice issued to the co-owning spouses without distinguishing between them and without reference to such apportionment is sufficient for that purpose.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 70 of 22.3.2003.