CELEX: 52013DC0378
Language: en
Date: 2013-05-29 00:00:00
Title: Recommendation for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION on the United Kingdom’s 2013 national reform programme and delivering a Council opinion on the United Kingdom’s convergence programme for 2012-2017

|
			
		
		
		52013DC0378
		
			Recommendation for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION on the United Kingdom’s 2013 national reform programme and delivering a Council opinion on the United Kingdom’s convergence programme for 2012-2017 /* COM/2013/0378 final */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	 
Recommendation for a
COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
on the United Kingdom’s 2013 national
reform programme 
and delivering a Council opinion on the United Kingdom’s convergence programme
for 2012-2017

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 121(2) and 148(4)
thereof,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary
positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies[1], and in particular Article 9(2)
thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No
1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2011 on
the prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances[2], and in particular Article 6(1)
thereof,
Having regard to the recommendation of the
European Commission[3],
Having regard to the resolutions of the
European Parliament[4],
Having regard to the conclusions of the
European Council,
Having regard to the opinion of the
Employment Committee,
After consulting the Economic and Financial
Committee,
Whereas:
(1)       On 26 March 2010, the
European Council agreed to the Commission’s proposal to launch a new strategy
for growth and jobs, Europe 2020, based on enhanced coordination of economic
policies, which will focus on the key areas where action is needed to boost Europe’s potential for sustainable growth and competitiveness.
(2)       On 13 July 2010, the
Council, on the basis of the Commission's proposals, adopted a recommendation
on the broad guidelines for the economic policies of the Member States and the
Union (2010 to 2014) and, on 21 October 2010, adopted a decision on guidelines
for the employment policies of the Member States[5],
which together form the ‘integrated guidelines’. Member States were invited to
take the integrated guidelines into account in their national economic and
employment policies.
(3)       On 29 June 2012, the Heads
of State or Government decided on a Compact for Growth and Jobs, providing a
coherent framework for action at national, EU and euro area levels using all
possible levers, instruments and policies. They decided on action to be taken
at the level of the Member States, in particular expressing full commitment to
achieving the objectives of the Europe 2020 Strategy and to implementing the
country-specific recommendations.
(4)       On 6 July 2012, the
Council adopted a recommendation on the United Kingdom’s national reform
programme for 2012 and delivered its opinion on the United Kingdom’s 2012
convergence programme for 2012-2017.
(5)       On 28 November 2012, the
Commission adopted the Annual Growth Survey[6],
marking the start of the 2013 European Semester of economic policy
coordination. Also on 28 November 2012, the Commission, on the basis of
Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011, adopted the Alert Mechanism Report[7], in which it identified the United Kingdom as one of the Member States for which an in-depth review would be carried
out.
(6)       On 14 March 2013, the
European Council endorsed the priorities for ensuring financial stability,
fiscal consolidation and action to foster growth. It underscored the need to
pursue differentiated, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation, to restore normal
lending conditions to the economy, to promote growth and competitiveness, to
tackle unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis, and to modernise
public administration.
(7)       On 10 April 2013, the
Commission published the results of its in-depth review[8] for the United Kingdom, under Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011. The Commission’s analysis leads it
to conclude that the United Kingdom is experiencing macroeconomic imbalances, which
deserve monitoring and policy action. In particular, macroeconomic developments
in the area of household debt, linked to the high levels of mortgage debt and
the characteristics of the housing market, as well as unfavourable developments
in external competitiveness, especially as regards goods exports and weak
productivity growth, continue to deserve attention. 
(8)       On 30 April 2013, the United Kingdom submitted its 2013 convergence programme covering the period 2012-2017 and
its 2013 national reform programme. In order to take account of their
interlinkages, the two programmes have been assessed at the same time.
(9)       Pursuant to paragraph 4 of
the Protocol (No 15) on certain provisions relating to the United Kingdom of
Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the obligation in Article 126(1) of the
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to avoid excessive general
government deficits does not apply to the UK. Paragraph 5 of the Protocol
provides that the UK is to endeavour to avoid an excessive government deficit.
On 8 July 2008 the Council decided, in accordance with Article 104(6) of the
Treaty establishing the European Community, that an excessive deficit exists in
the UK. 
(10)     Based on the assessment of
the 2013 Convergence Programme pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97,
the Council is of the opinion that the macroeconomic scenario underpinning the
budgetary projections in the programme is plausible. The objective of the
budgetary strategy outlined in the Convergence Programme is to achieve a
cyclically-adjusted budget of close to balance at the end of a five-year
rolling period. The general government deficit peaked at 11.5% of GDP in
2009-10[9]
and was reduced to 5.6% of GDP in 2012-13, thanks to one-off measures that
artificially reduced the deficit by 2 pp. in 2012-13. However, the Convergence
Programme shows that the government is projected to miss the deadline of
2014-15 for correction of the excessive deficit set by the Council as the
deficit is estimated at 6.0% of GDP that year. According to programme
projections, the year in which the excessive deficit will be corrected is in
2017-18 at 2.3% of GDP, three years after the deadline set by the Council in
December 2009. The programme foresees the structural general government
deficit, as recalculated by the Commission, improving marginally from 5.6% of
GDP in 2013-14 to 5.1% of GDP in 2014-15. Over the period 2010-11 to 2012-13,
the average adjusted fiscal effort is estimated at 1.0% of GDP, well below the
1¾% of GDP recommended by the Council. The main risks to the budgetary
projections stem from lower-than-expected growth due to persistently high
inflation curtailing private consumption and a potential deterioration in the
international environment that could affect trade and investment. The
Convergence Programme does not include a medium-term budgetary objective as
foreseen by the Stability and Growth Pact. The government has continued with its
fiscal consolidation strategy but, because of higher-than-expected expenditure due
to the operation of automatic stabilisers and lower-than-expected tax revenues,
the deficit is higher than forecast. Also, the consolidation measures taken so far
have not been sufficient in attaining the required fiscal effort to correct the
excessive deficit. Moreover, the potential revenue contribution from structural
reform, e.g. aiming to increase the efficiency of the tax system through
revisions of the VAT rate structure, remains relatively under-exploited. Government
debt as a percentage of GDP rose from 56.1% in 2008-09 to 90.7% in 2012-13.
According to the programme, the general government debt ratio is projected to
increase to 100.8% in 2015-16 and 2016-17 before falling back 99.4% in 2017-18.

(11)     Household deleveraging
continued in 2012, but at 96 % of GDP, UK household debt remains well
above the euro area average and deleveraging may not be sustained once the
economy improves and housing transactions return to more normal levels. House
prices remain high and volatile in the context of a housing shortage. Because of
a combination of high house prices and the widespread use of variable-rate
mortgages, households are particularly exposed to interest rate changes, as
well as to rises in unemployment. The government has taken action to reform the
spatial planning laws but residential construction remains at a low level and
the planning system, including green belt restrictions, continues to be an
important constraint on the supply of housing. Government interventions that
stimulate housing demand more than supply, including the recently announced
Help to Buy scheme could potentially exacerbate this situation by increasing house
prices and household debt. The UK property tax system combines a regressive recurring
tax (Council Tax) with a progressive transaction tax (Stamp Duty Land Tax). A
combination of high house prices, stretched household finances and more
responsible lending criteria are likely to continue to prevent many middle-income
households from becoming home owners. In this context, private renting could be
made a more attractive and viable long-term alternative to home ownership.
(12)     The UK faces the challenges of both unemployment and underemployment, especially among the young.
Unemployment stood at 7.8 % at the beginning of 2013 and is expected to
remain broadly flat through 2013 and 2014. Youth unemployment is much higher,
at 20.7% and it has steadily increased since 2007, when it stood at 14.3 %.
The proportion of young people not in education, employment or training is 14.0 %.
Private sector employment has grown strongly in the last year, given the slow
GDP growth, but productivity and wage growth have been weak. The UK also has an oversupply of low-skilled workers for whom demand is falling. At the same
time the UK has a shortage of workers with high-quality vocational and
technical skills which contributes to a lack of external competitiveness. Despite
some progress in recent years, a significant proportion of young people do not
have the skills and qualifications they need to compete successfully in the
labour market. The unemployment rate of low skilled 15-25 year olds is 37.2%,
significantly above the EU average. Existing vocational education and training
policy has been too focused on basic skills and level 2 qualifications, while
the economy increasingly demands more advanced qualifications. While there have
been efforts to improve the quality of apprenticeship programmes, further
efforts are needed. In particular, the qualifications system remains very
complex, which may negatively impact on businesses’ involvement in
apprenticeship programmes. The UK could build on the current Youth Contract to
implement a Youth Guarantee and address the problem of youth unemployment and
those not in education, employment or training.
(13)     Weak work incentives have
been a persistent problem in the UK. The authorities plan to address this with
the introduction of the Universal Credit, which will allow individuals to keep
more of their benefit income as they move into work. Whilst Universal Credit
could have a positive impact on employment much will depend on effective
implementation and support services, including the interaction with other
benefits. In parallel, many working-age benefits and tax credits will be
increased by 1 % a year until 2016 which is below the projected inflation
rate. A range of other reforms to welfare benefits were also introduced in
April 2013. There is a risk of increased poverty, including more child poverty
for those in households that do not find employment. In contrast, the scope,
level and uprating of both universal and means-tested payments to pensioners
have been largely exempt from cuts. Early results from the Work Programme suggest
scope to improve the delivery and outcomes. The UK also faces ongoing
challenges to increase parental employment and improve access to high-quality,
affordable childcare. At 17.3%, the proportion of UK children living in
workless households is the second highest in the EU. Currently, childcare costs
in the UK are among the highest in the EU, which poses particular problems for
second earners in couples, and for single parents. In 2010, only 4 % of
children under three used formal childcare on a full-time basis, well below the
EU average of 14 %. 
(14)     The
stock of UK corporate debt is fairly high, yet some firms are having difficulty
accessing credit, and business investment remains at very low levels. An
unprecedented drop in business investment after 2007 caused gross fixed capital
formation to fall to 14.2 % of GDP in 2012. This is the third lowest level
in the EU. The UK has a low level of business expenditure on R&D, which
fell from 1.17 % of GDP in 2001 to 1.09 % in 2011. Business
investment has started to pick up slightly, with an annual increase of 4.9 %
in 2012, but remains low. Net lending to the corporate sector remained negative
in 2012. While larger firms with strong balance sheets are able to borrow at a
historically low cost, many other firms, particularly SMEs, are having
difficulty accessing credit. This is exacerbated by limited competition in the
banking industry. Proper implementation of the Financial Policy Committee’s
recommendations on prudent reckoning of bank capital requirements and on
addressing identified capital shortfalls without hindering lending to the
economy should help reinforce the financial stability of the UK banking system.
(15)     The
  UK has a challenge to renew and upgrade its energy and transport
infrastructure. The UK needs substantial investment in new electricity
generation capacity by 2020, both to replace old plants that are due to close,
and to meet the renewables obligation and tighter carbon emissions standards.
At 3.8 %, the share of renewable energy sources in final energy
consumption ranks 25th out of 27 Member States (EU average 13.0 %).
Regulatory certainty will be required to facilitate adequate and timely
investment. Shortcomings in the capacity and quality of the UK’s transport networks are a structural problem for the economy, especially for goods producers,
distributors and exporters. There is currently a significant gap between
committed funding, public and private, and the pipeline of transport investment
needs which the government is seeking to address by prioritising public
spending towards infrastructure and by attracting additional private investment.
Unit costs in transport construction and maintenance also remain high in the UK.
(16)     In the context of the
European Semester, the Commission has carried out a comprehensive analysis of
the United Kingdom’s economic policy. It has assessed the convergence programme
and national reform programme, and presented an in-depth review. It has taken
into account not only their relevance for sustainable fiscal and socio-economic
policy in the United Kingdom but also their compliance with EU rules and
guidance, given the need to reinforce the overall economic governance of the
European Union by providing EU-level input into future national decisions. Its
recommendations under the European Semester are reflected in recommendations
(1) to (6) below.
(17)     In the light of this
assessment, the Council has examined the United Kingdom’s convergence
programme, and its opinion[10]
is reflected in particular in recommendation (1) below.
(18)     In the light of the
Commission’s in-depth review and this assessment, the Council has examined the United Kingdom’s national reform programme and convergence programme. Its recommendations
under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011 are reflected in
recommendations (2), (3), (5) and (6) below,
HEREBY RECOMMENDS that the United Kingdom should take action within the period 2013-2014 to:
1.           Implement a reinforced
budgetary strategy, supported by sufficiently specified measures, for the year
2013-14 and beyond. Ensure the correction of the excessive deficit in a
sustainable manner by 2014/15, and the achievement of the fiscal effort
specified in the Council recommendations under the EDP and set the high public
debt ratio on a sustained downward path. A durable correction of the fiscal
imbalances requires the credible implementation of ambitious structural reforms
which would increase the adjustment capacity and boost potential growth. Pursue
a differentiated, growth-friendly approach to fiscal tightening, including
through prioritising timely capital expenditure with high economic returns and
through a balanced approach to the composition of consolidation measures and
promoting medium and long-term fiscal sustainability. In order to raise revenue,
make greater use of the standard rate of VAT. 
2.           Take further action to
increase housing supply, including through further liberalisation of spatial
planning laws and an efficient operation of the planning system. Ensure that housing
policy, including the Help to Buy scheme does not encourage excessive mortgage
lending; and lead to higher house prices. Pursue reforms to land and property
taxation to reduce distortions and promote timely residential construction.
Take steps to improve the legal framework of rental markets, in particular by
making longer rental terms more attractive to both tenants and landlords.
3.           Building on the Youth
Contract, step up measures to address youth unemployment, for example through a
Youth Guarantee. Increase the quality and duration of apprenticeships, simplify
the system of qualifications and strengthen the engagement of employers,
particularly in the provision of advanced and intermediate technical skills. Reduce
the number of young people aged 18-24 who have very poor basic skills,
including through effectively implementing the Traineeships programme.
4.           Enhance efforts to support
low-income households and reduce child poverty by ensuring that the Universal
Credit and other welfare reforms deliver a fair tax-benefit system with clearer
work incentives and support services. Accelerate the implementation of planned
measures to reduce the costs of childcare and improve its quality and
availability.
5.           Take further steps to
improve the availability of bank and non-bank financing to the corporate
sector, while ensuring that the measures primarily target viable companies,
especially SMEs. Reduce barriers to entry in the banking sector, lower
switching costs and facilitate the emergence of challenger banks through a
divestiture of banking assets. Effectively implement the Financial Policy
Committee’s recommendations on prudent assessment of bank capital requirements
and on addressing identified capital shortfalls.
6.           Take
measures to facilitate a timely increase in network infrastructure investment, especially
by promoting more efficient and robust planning and decision-making processes.
Provide a stable regulatory framework for investment in new energy capacity,
including in renewable energy. Improve the capacity and quality of transport
networks by providing greater predictability and certainty on planning and funding
and by harnessing the most effective mix of public and private capital sources.
Done at Brussels, 
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
[1]               OJ L 209, 2.8.1997, p. 1.
[2]               OJ L 306, 23.11.2011, p. 25.
[3]               COM(2013)378 final.
[4]               P7_TA(2013)0052 and P7_TA(2013)0053.
[5]               Council Decision 2013/208/EU of 22 April 2013.
[6]               COM(2012) 750 final.
[7]               COM(2012) 751 final.
[8]               SWD(2013) 125 final.
[9]               2009-10 refers to the financial year which starts on
1 April and ends on 31 March
[10]             Under Article 9(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97.