CELEX: 62020TN0505
Language: en
Date: 2020-08-11 00:00:00
Title: Case T-505/20: Action brought on 11 August 2020 — Guo v EUIPO — Sand Cph (sandriver)

28.9.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 320/29
            
         
      Action brought on 11 August 2020 — Guo v EUIPO — Sand Cph (sandriver)
      (Case T-505/20)
      (2020/C 320/61)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Xiuling Guo (Shanyang Town, China) (represented by: L. Le Stanc, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sand Cph A/S (Copenhagen, Denmark)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
      
         Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark sandriver — European Union trade mark No 15 856 297
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 June 2020 in Case R 2019/2019-2
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  declare admissible the action brought against the contested decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision in its entirety;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order EUIPO to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the General Court and the Board of Appeal.
               
            
         Plea in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Articles 60(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by finding that there was a likelihood of confusion for the public between the earlier European Union word mark No 3 105 491 and the applicant’s later semi-figurative European Union trade mark No 15 856 297.