CELEX: 62017CB0333
Language: en
Date: 2017-10-26 00:00:00
Title: Case C-333/17: Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga — Portugal) — Caixa Económica Montepio Geral v Carlos Samuel Pimenta Marinho and Others (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 21 and 38 — Non-discrimination — Consumer protection — Contract for a bank loan — Question which does not concern a rule of EU law other than those contained in the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

8.1.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 5/16
            
         Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga — Portugal) — Caixa Económica Montepio Geral v Carlos Samuel Pimenta Marinho and Others
   (Case C-333/17) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 21 and 38 - Non-discrimination - Consumer protection - Contract for a bank loan - Question which does not concern a rule of EU law other than those contained in the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court))
   (2018/C 005/22)
   Language of the case: Portuguese
   
      Referring court
   
   Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Caixa Económica Montepio Geral
   
      Defendants: Carlos Samuel Pimenta Marinho, Maria de Lurdes Coelho Pimenta Marinho, Daniel Pimenta Marinho, Vera da Conceição Pimenta Marinho
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Braga (District Court, Braga, Portugal) by decision of 29 March 2017.
   
      (1)  OJ C 256, 07.08.2017