CELEX: C1997/142/65
Language: en
Date: 1997-05-10 00:00:00
Title: Action brought on 17 March 1997 by M. V. Diederen against the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities (Case T-69/97)

No C 142/30              EN                   Official Journal of the European Communities                                    10 . 5 . 97
Action brought on 13 March 1997 by J. P. M. Wolfs                        Action brought on 17 March 1997 by M. V. Diederen
against the Council of the European Union and the                        against the Council of the European Union and the
            Commission of the European Communities                                   Commission of the European Communities
                            ( Case T-67/97)                                                          ( Case T-69/97)
                              ( 97/C 142/64 )                                                         ( 97/C 142/65 )
                   (Language of the case: Dutch)                                            (Language of the case: Dutch)
An action against the Council of the European Union and
the Commission of the European Communities was                           An action against the Council of the European Union and
brought before the Court of First Instance of the European               the Commission of the European Communities was
Communities on 13 March 1997 by J. P. M. Wolfs, of                       brought before the Court of First Instance of the European
Gronsveld ( Netherlands ), represented by E. H. Pijnacker                Communities on 17 March 1997 by M. V. Diederen, of
Hordijk, of the Amsterdam Bar, and M. T. P. J. van Oers,                 Doenrade (Netherlands ), represented by E. H. Pijnacker
of The Hague Bar, with an address for service in                         Hordijk, of the Amsterdam Bar, and M. T. P. J. van Oers,
Luxembourg at the Chambers of L. Frieden, 62 Avenue                      of The Hague Bar, with an address for service in
Guillaume .                                                              Luxembourg at the Chambers of L. Frieden, 62 Avenue
                                                                         Guillaume .
The applicant claims that the Court should:
                                                                         The applicant claims that the Court should:
( a ) primarily: order the Community to pay to the
       applicant the sum of Fl 132 162, together with interest           ( a ) primarily: order the Community to pay to the
       thereon at the rate of 8 % per annum from 19 May                          applicant the sum of Fl 137 580, together with interest
        1992 until the date of payment in full;                                 thereon at the rate of 8% per annum from 19 May
                                                                                 1992 until the date of payment in full;
        in the alternative: order the Community to pay the
        applicant such sum as the Court in its wisdom shall                      in the alternative: order the Community to pay the
        think fit, amounting to not less than Fl 55 016                          applicant such sum as the Court in its wisdom shall
        ( namely, the amount resulting from the application of                   think fit, amounting to not less than Fl 56 237
        Regulation ( EEC ) No 2187/93 ), together with interest                  ( namely, the amount resulting from the application of
        thereon at the rate of 8 % per annum from 1 9 May                        Regulation ( EEC ) No 2187/93 ), together with interest
        1 992 until the date of the payment in full;                             thereon at the rate of 8% per annum from 19 May
                                                                                 1992 until the date of the payment in full;
 ( b ) order the Community to pay the costs.
                                                                          ( b ) order the Community to pay the costs.
 Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:
                                                                          Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:
 The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as in
 Case T-50/97 (»).
                                                                          The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as in
 f 1 ) Page 24 of this Official Journal .                                 Case T-50/97 ( ! ).
                                                                          ( ] ) Page 24 of this Official Journal .