CELEX: 62018TN0432
Language: en
Date: 2018-07-13 00:00:00
Title: Case T-432/18: Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Palo v Commission

10.9.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 319/23
            
         
      Action brought on 13 July 2018 — Palo v Commission
      (Case T-432/18)
      (2018/C 319/27)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Peeter Palo (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission
      
         Form of order sought
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the defendant’s decision of 5 October 2017 not to allocate the applicant the severance grant provided for under Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul the defendant’s decision of 10 April 2018 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 11 December 2017 directed against the abovementioned decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the material damage suffered by the applicant;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to compensate the applicant for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to bear all the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 12(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination.
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations.
               
            
                  4.
               
               
                  Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of the principle of good administration and of the duty of care.