CELEX: 62016CA0551
Language: en
Date: 2018-03-21 00:00:00
Title: Case C-551/16: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — J. Klein Schiphorst v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation — Coordination of social security systems — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Articles 7, 63 and 64 — Unemployment benefits — Unemployed person going to another Member State — Retention of entitlement to benefits — Duration)

14.5.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 166/12
            
         Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 21 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep — Netherlands) — J. Klein Schiphorst v Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen
   (Case C-551/16) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Agreement between the European Community and the Swiss Confederation - Coordination of social security systems - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Articles 7, 63 and 64 - Unemployment benefits - Unemployed person going to another Member State - Retention of entitlement to benefits - Duration))
   (2018/C 166/15)
   Language of the case: Dutch
   
      Referring court
   
   Centrale Raad van Beroep
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Appellant: J. Klein Schiphorst
   
      Respondent: Raad van bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut werknemersverzekeringen
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Article 64(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems must be interpreted as not precluding a national measure, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, that requires the competent institution to refuse, as a matter of principle, any request to extend the unemployment benefit export period beyond three months, provided the institution does not consider that refusing that request would lead to an unreasonable result.
   
      (1)  OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.