CELEX: 62014TN0635
Language: en
Date: 2014-08-22 00:00:00
Title: Case T-635/14: Action brought on 22 August 2014 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)

13.10.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 361/28
            
         Action brought on 22 August 2014 — Urb Rulmenti Suceava v OHIM — Adiguzel (URB)
   (Case T-635/14)
   2014/C 361/42
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Urb Rulmenti Suceava SA (Suceava, Romania) (represented by: I. Burdusel, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Harun Adiguzel (Diosd, Hungary)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 June 2014 given in Case R 1974/2013-4.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘URB’ for goods and services in Classes 4, 6-9, 11, 12, 16, 17, 35, 37 and 39-42 — the Community trade mark No 8 6 56  605
   
      Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: Absolute grounds for invalidity under Article 52(1)(b) CTMR and relative grounds for invalidity under Article 8(1)(a) and (b) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) CTMR
   
      Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the request for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) CTMR, Article 8(1)(a) and (b) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) CTMR and Article 53(2) CTMR.