CELEX: 62011TA0247
Language: en
Date: 2013-03-07 00:00:00
Title: Case T-247/11: Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — FairWild Foundation v OHIM — Wild (FAIRWILD) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Community — Word mark FAIRWILD — Earlier Community word mark WILD — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

20.4.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 114/33
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 7 March 2013 — FairWild Foundation v OHIM — Wild (FAIRWILD)
   (Case T-247/11) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Community - Word mark FAIRWILD - Earlier Community word mark WILD - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2013/C 114/53
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: FairWild Foundation (Weinfelden, Switzerland) (represented by: P. Neuwald and S. Müller, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Rudolf Wild GmbH & Co. KG (Eppelheim, Germany) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2011 (Case R 1014/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Rudolf Wild GmbH & Co. KG and FairWild Foundation
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders FairWild Foundation to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 238, 13.8.2011.