CELEX: C2002/191/44
Language: en
Date: 2002-08-10 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 May 2002 in Case T-18/01 Anthony Goldstein v Commission of the European Communities (Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Competition — Rejection of complaint — Action manifestly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)

10.8.2002              EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                           C 191/25
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                               with an address for service in Luxembourg, supported by
                                                                          Eurobrom BV, established in Rijswijk (Netherlands), Lonza
                          of 5 June 2002                                  GmbH, established in Wuppertal (Germany), Arch Chemi-
                                                                          cals SA, established in Paris, Troy Chemical Company BV,
in Case T-198/00: Hershey Foods Corporation v Office                      established in Maassluis (Netherlands), represented by K. Van
for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks                     Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers, with an address for service
                     and Designs) (OHIM) (1)                              in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Com-
                                                                          munities (Agents: R. Wainwright and L. Ström) — application
(Community trade mark — Figurative mark ‘Kiss device                      for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1896/2000
with plume’ — Right to be heard — Article 73 of Regulation                of 7 September 2000 on the first phase of the programme
(EC) No 40/94 — Prior registration of the mark in certain                 referred to in Article 16(2) of Directive 98/8/EC of the
                          Member States)                                  European Parliament and of the Council on biocidal products
                                                                          (OJ 2000 L 228, p. 6) — the Court of First Instance
                                                                          (Second Chamber), composed of R.M. Moura Ramos, President,
                         (2002/C 191/42)
                                                                          J. Pirrung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has
                                                                          made an order on 29 April 2002, the operative part of which
                   (Language of the case: English)                        is as follows:
In Case T-198/00, Hershey Foods Corporation, established in               1.    The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.
Hershey, Pennsylvania (United States), represented by
R. Wyand, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg,              2.    The applicant shall pay its own costs and those of the
v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks                  Commission, including those relating to the proceedings for
and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl, J. Miranda                      interim measures, but with the exception of those attributable
de Sousa and A. Di Carlo): Action brought against the decision                  to the interventions.
of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation
in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 May                3.    The interveners shall pay their own costs, and shall jointly and
2000 (Case R 391/1999-3), the Court of First Instance (Second                   severally pay those incurred by the defendant as a result of their
Chamber), composed of: R.M. Moura Ramos, President, J. Pir-                     interventions.
rung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for
the Registrar, has given a judgment on 5 June 2002, in which
it:                                                                       (1) OJ C 4 of 6.1.2001.
1.    Dismisses the application;
2.    Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
(1) OJ C 302 of 21.10.2000.
                                                                                 ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                                    of 27 May 2002
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                in Case T-18/01 Anthony Goldstein v Commission of the
                                                                                              European Communities (1)
                        of 29 April 2002
                                                                          (Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements
in Case T-339/00: Bactria Industriehygiene-Service Ver-
                                                                          — Competition — Rejection of complaint — Action mani-
waltungs GmbH v Commission of the European Com-
                                                                                    festly inadmissible or manifestly unfounded)
                            munities (1)
(Regulation (EC) No 1896/2000 — Directive 98/8/EC —                                                 (2002/C 191/44)
Biocidal products — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility
               — Person individually concerned)
                                                                                              (Language of the case: English)
                         (2002/C 191/43)
                   (Language of the case: English)                        In Case T-18/01 Anthony Goldstein, residing at Harrow,
                                                                          Middlesex (United Kingdom), represented by R. St. John
                                                                          Murphy, Solicitor, against Commission of the European Com-
In Case T-339/00: Bactria Industriehygiene-Service Verwal-                munities (Agent: P. Oliver), action for annulment of the
tungs GmbH, established in Kirchheimbolanden (Germany),                   Commission’s decision of 12 January 2001 rejecting the
represented by K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers,                     applicant’s complaint concerning the alleged infringement of
 ---pagebreak--- C 191/26                EN                       Official Journal of the European Communities                                       10.8.2002
Articles 81 and 82 EC by the General Council of the Bar of                  ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
England and Wales — the Court of First Instance (Fourth                                                  INSTANCE
Chamber), composed of: M. Vilaras, President, V. Tiili and
P. Mengozzi, Judges; H. Jung: Registrar, has made an order in                                         of 7 May 2002
which it:
                                                                            in Case T-306/01 R Abdirisak Aden and Others v Council
1.    Dismisses the application.                                            of the European Union and Commission of the European
                                                                                                       Communities
2.    Orders the applicant to bear his own costs, incurred both in
      these proceedings and in the proceedings for interim relief in        (Proceedings for interim measures — Common foreign
      Cases T-18/01 R and T-18/01 R III, and pay the costs                  and security policy — Sanctions against the Taliban of
      incurred by the Commission in these proceedings and in the                    Afghanistan — Freezing of funds — Urgency)
      proceedings for interim relief in Case T-18/01 R.
                                                                                                     (2002/C 191/46)
(1) OJ C 108 of 7.4.2001.                                                                     (Language of the case: Swedish)
                                                                            In Case T-306/01 R: Abdirisak Aden, resident in Spånga
                                                                            (Sweden), Abdulaziz Ali, resident in Järfälla (Sweden), Ahmed
                                                                            Yusuf, resident in Spånga, Al Barakaat International Foun-
                                                                            dation, established in Spånga, represented by L. Silbersky and
                                                                            T. Olsson, lawyers, against Council of the European Union
ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST                                (Agents: M. Vitsentzatos and I. Rådestad) and Commission of
                              INSTANCE                                      the European Communities (Agents: A. Van Solinge and
                                                                            J. Enegren) — application for suspension of the implemen-
                       of 19 February 2002                                  tation of Council Regulation (EC) No 467/2001 of 6 March
                                                                            2001 prohibiting the export of certain goods and services to
                                                                            Afghanistan, strengthening the flight ban and extending the
in Case T-302/01 R: Gerhard Birkhoff v Commission of                        freeze of funds and other financial resources in respect of the
                  the European Communities                                  Taliban of Afghanistan, and repealing Regulation (EC) No 337/
                                                                            2000 (OJ 2001 L 67, p. 1) and of Commission Regulation (EC)
                                                                            No 2199/2001 of 12 November 2001 amending, for the
(Procedure for interim relief — Officials — Dependent child                 fourth time, Regulation No 467/2001 (OJ 2001 L 295, p. 16)
allowance — Suspension of operation of a measure —                          in so far as they apply to the applicants, until there has been a
                         Urgency — None)                                    ruling on the substance — the President of the Court of First
                                                                            Instance has made an order on 7 May 2002, the operative part
                          (2002/C 191/45)                                   of which is as follows:
                                                                            1.   The application for interim measures is dismissed.
                    (Language of the case: Italian)
                                                                            2.   The costs are reserved.
In Case T-302/01 R: Gerhard Birkhoff, a former official of
the Commission of the European Communities, residing at
Weitnau (Germany), represented by V. Salvatore, lawyer, v
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall                  Action brought on 9 May 2002 by Villiger Söhne GmbH
and A. Dal Ferro) — application for suspension of operation                          against the Council of the European Union
of the Commission’s decision of 26 September 2001 rejecting
the complaint lodged by the applicant, and of the decision of
4 July 2001 by which the Commission suspended payment to                                             (Case T-154/02)
the applicant of the dependent child allowance in favour of his
daughter — the President of the Court of First Instance made                                         (2002/C 191/47)
an order on 19 September 2002, the operative part of which
is as follows:                                                                                (Language of the case: German)
1.    The application for interim measures is dismissed.
                                                                            An action against the Council of the European Union was
                                                                            brought before the Court of First Instance of the European
2.    The costs are reserved.
                                                                            Communities on 9 May 2002 by Villiger Söhne GmbH,
                                                                            Waldshut-Tiengen (Germany), represented by B. Wägenbaur,
                                                                            lawyer.