CELEX: C2005/155/33
Language: en
Date: 2005-06-25 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 April 2005 in Case T-318/03 Atomic Austria GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Word mark ATOMIC BLITZ — Opposition of the proprietor of national word marks ATOMIC — Evidence of renewal of registration of the earlier mark — Scope of the examination conducted by OHIM — Rejection of opposition — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

25.6.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 155/17
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 20 April 2005
   in Case T-318/03 Atomic Austria GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Word mark ATOMIC BLITZ - Opposition of the proprietor of national word marks ATOMIC - Evidence of renewal of registration of the earlier mark - Scope of the examination conducted by OHIM - Rejection of opposition - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2005/C 155/33)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case T-318/03: Atomic Austria GmbH, established in Altenmarkt (Austria), represented by G. Kucsko and C. Schumacher, lawyers, against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Schneider and B. Müller), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal having been Fabricas Agrupadas de Muñecas de Onil, SA, established in Onil (Spain) — action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 July 2003 (Case R 95/2003-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Atomic Austria GmbH and Fabricas Agrupadas de Muñecas de Onil, SA, — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and I. Pelikánová, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 20 April 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 July 2003 (Case R 95/2003-2);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 304 of 13.12.2003.