CELEX: 62013TB0288
Language: en
Date: 2014-05-26 00:00:00
Title: Case T-288/13 P: Order of the General Court of 26 May 2014  — AK v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Reports procedure — Career development report — Appraisal for the years 2001/2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2008 — Delay in drawing up career development reports — Non-material damage — Loss of opportunity for promotion — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

15.9.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 315/59
            
         Order of the General Court of 26 May 2014 — AK v Commission
   (Case T-288/13 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Reports procedure - Career development report - Appraisal for the years 2001/2002, 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2008 - Delay in drawing up career development reports - Non-material damage - Loss of opportunity for promotion - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))
   2014/C 315/99
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: AK (Esbo, Finland) (represented by: originally by D. de Abreu Caldas, S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, then by D. de Abreu and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and C.Berardis-Kayser, Agents and B. Wägenbauer, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Third Chamber) of 13 March 2013 in Case F-91/10 AK v Commission [2013] ECR II-0000 seeking the annulment of that judgment.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               AK is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 233, 10.8.2013.