CELEX: 62018CO0677
Language: en
Date: 2021-07-12 00:00:00
Title: Rectification order of 12 July 2021.#Amoena Ltd v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs.#Rectification of judgment.#Case C-677/18.

ORDER OF THE COURT (Tenth Chamber)
   12 July 2021 (
         *1
      )
   (Rectification of judgment)
   In Case C‑677/18 REC,
   REQUEST for a preliminary ruling under Article 267 TFEU from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom), made by decision of 1 November 2018, received at the Court on 5 November 2018, in the proceedings
   
      Amoena Ltd
   
   v
   
      Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs,
   
   THE COURT (Tenth Chamber),
   composed of E. Juhász, acting as President of the Chamber, C. Lycourgos (Rapporteur) and I. Jarukaitis, Judges,
   Advocate General: M. Bobek,
   Registrar: A. Calot Escobar,
   after hearing the Advocate General,
   makes the following
   
      Order
   
   
            1
         
         
            On 19 December 2019, the Court (Tenth Chamber) delivered the judgment in Amoena (C‑677/18, EU:C:2019:1142).
         
      
            2
         
         
            That judgment contains, in the version in the language of the case, an error which it is appropriate for the Court to rectify of its own motion in accordance with Article 103(1) of the Rules of Procedure.
         
       
         
            On those grounds, the Court (Tenth Chamber) hereby orders:
         
       
         
            
                     
                        1.
                     
                  
                  
                     
                        Paragraph 51 of the judgment of 19 December 2019, Amoena (C‑677/18, EU:C:2019:1142), in the version in the language of the case, shall be rectified as follows:
                     
                     
                        ‘It follows from the Court’s case-law that the notion of “accessories”, for the purposes of Chapter 90 of the CN, implies interchangeable parts or devices designed to adapt a machine for a particular operation, or to increase its range of operations, or to enable it to perform a particular service relative to its main function (see, to that effect, judgments of 16 June 2011, Unomedical, C‑152/10, EU:C:2011:402, paragraph 29, and of 4 March 2015, Oliver Medical, C‑547/13, EU:C:2015:139, paragraph 69).’
                     
                  
               
       
         
            
                     
                        2.
                     
                  
                  
                     
                        The original of this order shall be annexed to the original of the rectified judgment. A note of this order shall be made in the margin of the original of the rectified judgment.
                     
                  
               
       
            
               
                  Luxembourg, 12 July 2021.
                  
                     
                        A. Calot Escobar
                        Registrar
                     
                     
                        E. Juhász
                        Acting as President of the Tenth Chamber
                     
                  
               
            
         (
         *1
      )	Language of the case: English.