CELEX: C2003/200/40
Language: en
Date: 2003-08-23 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 2003 in Case T-155/02: VVG International Handelsgesellschaft mbH and Others v Commission of the European Communities (Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 — Regulation (EC) No 560/2002 — Provisional safeguard measures — Actions for annulment — Inadmissibility)

C 200/22              EN                            Official Journal of the European Union                                        23.8.2003
                                                          COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                 Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
                                                                            and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: J. F. Crespo Carrillo), the other
                      of 26 February 2003                                   party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the
                                                                            Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
in Case T-7/02: ZAPF Creation AG v Office for Harmoni-                      and Designs) being: JESMAR, SA, established in Alicante
sation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)                     (Spain): Action brought against the decision of the First Board
                             (OHIM) (1)                                     of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
                                                                            Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 29 October 2001 (Case
(Community trade mark — Opposition — Amicable settle-                       R 418/2000-1), which was served on the applicant on
                 ment — No need to adjudicate)                              5 November 2001, relating to opposition proceedings between
                                                                            ZAPF Creation AG and JESMAR SA, the Court of First Instance
                          (2003/C 200/38)                                   (Fourth Chamber), composed of: V. Tiili, President, P. Mengozzi
                                                                            and M. Vilaras, Judges, Registrar: H. Jung, has made an order
                   (Language of the case: English)
                                                                            on 26 February 2003, the operative part of which is as
                                                                            follows:
In Case T-7/02, ZAPF Creation AG, established in Rödental/
Coburg (Germany), represented by A. Kockläuner, lawyer, v
                                                                            1.    There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: J. F. Crespo Carrillo), the other
party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the                  2.    The applicant shall pay the costs.
Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
and Designs) being: JESMAR, SA, established in Alicante
(Spain): Action brought against the decision of the First Board             (1) OJ C 109 of 4.5.2002.
of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 17 October 2001 (Case
R 1123/2000-1), which was served on the applicant on
29 October 2001, relating to opposition proceedings between
ZAPF Creation AG and JESMAR SA, the Court of First Instance
(Fourth Chamber), composed of: V. Tiili, President, P. Mengozzi
and M. Vilaras, Judges, Registrar: H. Jung, has made an order
on 26 February 2003, the operative part of which is as
follows:
1.    There is no need to adjudicate on the action.                                ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
2.    The applicant shall pay the costs.
                                                                                                     of 30 April 2003
( ) OJ C 109 of 4.5.2002.
 1
                                                                            in Case T-155/02: VVG International Handelsgesellschaft
                                                                            mbH and Others v Commission of the European Commu-
                                                                                                          nities (1)
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                            (Regulation (EC) No 3285/94 — Regulation (EC) No 560/
                      of 26 February 2003                                   2002 — Provisional safeguard measures — Actions for
                                                                                              annulment — Inadmissibility)
in Case T-8/02: ZAPF Creation AG v Office for Harmoni-
sation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
                             (OHIM) (1)                                                               (2003/C 200/40)
(Community trade mark — Opposition — Amicable settle-
                 ment — No need to adjudicate)
                                                                                               (Language of the case: German)
                          (2003/C 200/39)
                   (Language of the case: English)
                                                                            In Case T-155/02: VVG International Handelsgesellschaft mbH,
                                                                            established in Salzburg (Austria), VVG (International) Ltd,
In Case T-8/02, ZAPF Creation AG, established in Rödental/                  established in Gibraltar (United Kingdom), Metalsivas Metall-
Coburg (Germany), represented by A. Kockläuner, lawyer, v                   warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH, established in Vienna (Austria),
 ---pagebreak--- 23.8.2003                EN                         Official Journal of the European Union                                            C 200/23
represented by W. Schuler, lawyer, against Commission of the                2.    The applicants shall bear their own costs and those incurred by
European Communities (Agents: G. zur Hausen and B. Eggers)                        the Commission.
— application for annulment of Commission Regulation (EC)
No 560/2002 of 27 March 2002 imposing provisional safe-
guard measures against imports of certain steel products (OJ                (1) OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.
2002 L 85, p. 1) — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber),
composed of B. Vesterdorf, President, R.M. Moura Ramos and
H. Legal, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 30 April
2003, in which it:
1.    Dismissed the action as inadmissible.
2.    Ordered the applicants to bear their own costs and those of the              ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
      Commission, including the costs relating to the procedure for
      interim relief.
                                                                                                       of 6 May 2003
( ) OJ C 191 of 10.8.02.
 1
                                                                            in Case T-321/02: Paul Vannieuwenhuyze-Morin v
                                                                            European Parliament and Council of the European
                                                                                                          Union (1)
                                                                            (Application for annulment — Directive 2002/58/EC —
                                                                            Natural or legal persons — Standing to bring proceedings
                                                                                                     — Inadmissibility)
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                                      (2003/C 200/42)
                            of 9 April 2003
                                                                                                (Language of the case: French)
in Case T-280/02: Johannes Jacobus Pikaart and Others v
        Commission of the European Communities (1)
                                                                            In Case T-321/02: Paul Vannieuwenhuyze-Morin, residing in
                                                                            Grigny (France), represented by G. Dupaigne, lawyer, against
                                                                            the European Parliament (Agents: H. Duintjer Tebbens and
(Application for annulment — Actionable measures — Inad-
                                                                            A. Caiola) and the Council of the European Union (Agent:
                               missibility)
                                                                            M.-C. Giorgi Fort) — application for partial annulment of
                                                                            Directive 2002/58/EC of the European Parliament and of the
                                                                            Council of 12 July 2002 concerning the processing of personal
                            (2003/C 200/41)                                 data and the protection of privacy in the electronic commu-
                                                                            nications sector (Directive on privacy and electronic commu-
                                                                            nications) (OJ 2002 L 201, p. 37) — the Court of First
                      (Language of the case: Dutch)                         Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of V. Tiili, President,
                                                                            P. Mengozzi and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made
                                                                            an order on 6 May 2003, the operative part of which is as
                                                                            follows:
In Case T-280/02: Johannes Jacobus Pikaart, residing in Papen-
drecht (Netherlands), Johanna Cornelia Pikaart-Leeuwestein,
residing in Papendrecht, Scheepvaartonderneming ‘Factotum’                  1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
vof, established in Papendrecht, represented by J. van Dam
and D. Ouwerling, lawyers, against the Commission of the
European Communities (Agent: W. Wils) — application for                     2.    It is unnecessary to rule on the applications for leave to
annulment of the decision of the Commission contained in                          intervene lodged by the Kingdom of Spain and the Commission.
the letter addressed to the applicants by its services on 16 July
2002 (D (2002) 11796) — the Court of First Instance (Third
                                                                            3.    The applicant shall bear his own costs and those incurred by
Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President, J. Azizi and
                                                                                  the Parliament and the Council.
M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 9 April
2003, the operative part of which is as follows:
                                                                            (1) OJ C 7, 11.1.2003.
1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible.