CELEX: 62021TA0465
Language: en
Date: 2022-03-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-465/21: Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Ionfarma v EUIPO — LG Electronics (AION) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark AION — Earlier national figurative mark ION and earlier word mark IONFARMA — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

16.5.2022   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 198/46
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 23 March 2022 — Ionfarma v EUIPO — LG Electronics (AION)
      (Case T-465/21) (1)
      
      (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark AION - Earlier national figurative mark ION and earlier word mark IONFARMA - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
      (2022/C 198/67)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Ionfarma, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Correa Rodríguez, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Lapinskaite and J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agents)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2021 (Case R 2223/2020-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ionfarma and LG Electronics.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders Ionfarma, SL to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 382, 20.9.2021.