CELEX: 62014TA0083
Language: en
Date: 2015-12-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-83/14: Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2015 — LTJ Diffusion v OHIM — Arthur et Aston (ARTHUR & ASTON) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for word mark ARTHUR & ASTON — Earlier national figurative mark Arthur — No genuine use of the trade mark — Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Form differing in elements which alter the distinctive character)

1.2.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 38/48
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2015 — LTJ Diffusion v OHIM — Arthur et Aston (ARTHUR & ASTON)
   (Case T-83/14) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for word mark ARTHUR & ASTON - Earlier national figurative mark Arthur - No genuine use of the trade mark - Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Form differing in elements which alter the distinctive character))
   (2016/C 038/62)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: LTJ Diffusion (Colombes, France) (represented initially by S. Lederman, and subsequently by F. Fajgenbaum, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Arthur et Aston SAS (Giberville, France) (represented by: N. Boespflug, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 December 2013 (Case R 1963/2012-1), relating to opposition proceedings between LTJ Diffusion and Arthur et Aston SAS.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders LTJ Diffusion to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.