CELEX: 62015CA0528
Language: en
Date: 2017-03-15 00:00:00
Title: Case C-528/15: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie v Salah Al Chodor, Ajlin Al Chodor, Ajvar Al Chodor, (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection — Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) — Article 28(2) — Detention for the purpose of transfer — Article 2(n) — Significant risk of absconding — Objective criteria — Absence of a legal definition)

15.5.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 151/8
            
         Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie v Salah Al Chodor, Ajlin Al Chodor, Ajvar Al Chodor,
   (Case C-528/15) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection - Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (Dublin III) - Article 28(2) - Detention for the purpose of transfer - Article 2(n) - Significant risk of absconding - Objective criteria - Absence of a legal definition))
   (2017/C 151/11)
   Language of the case: Czech
   
      Referring court
   
   Nejvyšší správní soud
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Policie ČR, Krajské ředitelství policie Ústeckého kraje, odbor cizinecké policie
   
      Defendants: Salah Al Chodor, Ajlin Al Chodor, Ajvar Al Chodor
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Article 2(n) and Article 28(2) of Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person, read in conjunction, must be interpreted as requiring Member States to establish, in a binding provision of general application, objective criteria underlying the reasons for believing that an applicant for international protection who is subject to a transfer procedure may abscond. The absence of such a provision leads to the inapplicability of Article 28(2) of that regulation.
   
      (1)  OJ C 16, 18.1.2016.