CELEX: C2007/129/35
Language: en
Date: 2007-06-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-107/07 P: Appeal brought on 16 April 2007 by Francisco Rossi Ferreras against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 1 February 2007 in Case F-42/05 Rossi Ferreras v Commission

9.6.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 129/20
            
         Appeal brought on 16 April 2007 by Francisco Rossi Ferreras against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 1 February 2007 in Case F-42/05 Rossi Ferreras v Commission
   
   (Case T-107/07 P)
   (2007/C 129/35)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Appellant: Francisco Rossi Ferreras (Luxemburg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg) (represented by F. Frabetti, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities
   Form of order sought by the appellant
   
               —
            
            
               set aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 1 February 2007 in Case F-42/05;
            
         
               —
            
            
               grant the forms of order sought by the appellant at first instance and, primarily, declare the application in Case F-42/05 to be admissible and well founded;
            
         
               —
            
            
               in the alternative, remit the case to the Civil Service Tribunal;
            
         
               —
            
            
               make an order as to costs, expenses and fees and order the Commission to pay them.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   In his appeal, the appellant seeks the annulment of the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal dismissing his application for the annulment of his career development report for the period from 1 January to 31 December 2003 and an order requiring the Commission to compensate him for the damage that he claims to have suffered.
   In support of his appeal, the appellant claims that the Civil Service Tribunal made several errors of law in its consideration of the two pleas in law put forward at first instance.