CELEX: C2004/047/06
Language: en
Date: 2004-02-21 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 January 2004 in Case C-230/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division): The Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce v Penycoed Farming Partnership (Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Additional levy in the milk and milk products sector — Deliveries by a producer to a purchaser — Payment of levy — Recovery from the producer)

C 47/4                   EN                           Official Journal of the European Union                                               21.2.2004
Community law on freedom to provide services precludes a business             composed of: V. Skouris, acting for the President of the
from being subject to an obligation to be entered on the trades register      Sixth Chamber, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen, F. Macken and
which delays, complicates or renders more onerous the provision of its        N. Colneric (Rapporteur), Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate
services in the host Member State where the conditions prescribed by          General; L. Hewlett, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar,
the directive governing recognition of professional qualifications            has given a judgment on 15 January 2004, in which it has
which is applicable to pursuit of that activity in the host Member            ruled:
State are satisfied.
                                                                              Articles 1 and 2 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 of
                                                                              28 December 1992 establishing an additional levy in the milk and
The mere fact that a business established in one Member State
                                                                              milk products sector do not authorise the competent body to act
supplies identical or similar services in a repeated or more or less
                                                                              directly, in cases other than that of direct sales, against a producer to
regular manner in a second Member State, without having an
                                                                              recover the amount owed by him in respect of the additional levy on
infrastructure there enabling it to pursue a professional activity there
                                                                              milk. However, the Member States’ obligation under Article 10 EC
on a stable and continuous basis and, from the infrastructure, to hold
                                                                              to take measures to ensure collection of the levy in the event of the
itself out to, amongst others, nationals of the second Member State,
                                                                              mechanism provided for in Article 2(2) of that regulation being
cannot be sufficient for it to be regarded as established in the second
                                                                              frustrated includes the power to take direct action against the producer
Member State.
                                                                              with a view to recovering the amount payable where it is established
                                                                              that the producer has not paid it to the purchaser and that the
                                                                              purchaser is not taking due steps to collect it from the producer. On
(1) OJ C 212 of 28.7.2001.
                                                                              the other hand, non-compliance with the conditions laid down in
                                                                              Article 7 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 536/93 of 9 March
                                                                              1993 laying down detailed rules on the application of the additional
                                                                              levy on milk and milk products, and in particular the absence of
                                                                              approval as purchaser, is not in itself relevant.
                                                                              (1) OJ C 352 of 4.12.1999.
                  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                          (Sixth Chamber)
                         of 15 January 2004
                                                                                                 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
in Case C-230/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division):
The Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce v Peny-                                                of 13 January 2004
                   coed Farming Partnership (1)
                                                                              in Case C-256/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from
(Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 — Additional levy in the                         the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division):
milk and milk products sector — Deliveries by a producer to                   Debra Allonby v Accrington & Rossendale College, Edu-
a purchaser — Payment of levy — Recovery from the                             cation Lecturing Services, trading as Protocol Pro-
                               producer)                                      fessional, formerly Education Lecturing Services Sec-
                                                                                    retary of State for Education and Employment (1)
                           (2004/C 47/06)
                                                                              (Principle of equal pay for men and women — Direct effect
                                                                              — Meaning of worker — Self-employed female lecturer
                     (Language of the case: English)                          undertaking work presumed to be of equal value to that
                                                                              which is undertaken in the same college by male lecturers
                                                                              who are employees, but under contract with a third company
                                                                              — Self-employed lecturers not eligible for membership of an
In Case C-230/01: Reference to the Court under Article 234                                        occupational pension scheme)
EC by the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division)
for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that                                           (2004/C 47/07)
court between The Intervention Board for Agricultural Produce
and Penycoed Farming Partnership, on the interpretation of
Council Regulation (EEC) No 3950/92 of 28 December 1992                                            (Language of the case: English)
establishing an additional levy in the milk and milk products
sector (OJ 1992 L 405, p. 1) and Commission Regulation
(EEC) No 536/93 of 9 March 1993 laying down detailed rules
on the application of the additional levy on milk and milk                    In Case C-256/01: Reference to the Court under Article 234
products (OJ 1993 L 57, p. 12), the Court (Sixth Chamber),                    EC by the Court of Appeal (England and Wales) (Civil Division)