CELEX: 52012PC0201
Language: en
Date: 2012-05-04
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION amending Council Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement concerning the establishing of global technical regulations for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles (&quot;Parallel Agreement&quot;)

|
			
		
		
		52012PC0201
		
			Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION amending Council Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement concerning the establishing of global technical regulations for wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles ("Parallel Agreement") /* COM/2012/0201 final - 2012/0098 (NLE) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
·                        
Grounds for and objectives of the proposal
At international level, the United Nations
Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE) develops harmonised requirements, intended
to remove technical barriers to the trade in motor vehicles between the
Contracting Parties to the Revised 1958 Agreement and to ensure that such
vehicles offer a high level of safety and environmental protection.
The objective of this proposal is to
simplify and expedite the procedure regarding the voting of UNECE Regulations
by the Commission on behalf of the Union, hence reducing the delay in the
adoption of these acts in the framework of the UNECE. This is important as the
EU vehicle type-approval system currently relies more and more on UNECE
Regulations, which are replacing EU legislation (see Regulation (EC) No
661/2009 on General Safety[1]). In addition, quicker
adoption of legislation will allow for faster responses to regulatory requests
from the operators. 
Furthermore, the changes to the Treaties
occurred after the adoption of Council Decision 97/836/EC,
in particular the adoption of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, have substantially altered the decision
making procedure to be followed for the establishment of the position of the
Union when voting Regulations to be adopted by the UNECE and the conclusion of
agreements between the Union and international organisations, making it
necessary to adapt those Decisions to the new procedures.
The present proposal therefore aims at
adapting Council Decision 2000/125/EC to the decision making procedures
regarding international agreements set out in the Treaty on the Functioning of
the European Union (TFEU).
·                        
General context
By Council Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement
concerning the establishing of global technical regulations for wheeled
vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled
vehicles ("Parallel Agreement")[2] the Union has acceded to the Parallel Agreement, in the framework
of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).
That Decision should be amended to reflect
the changes introduced by the TFEU to the decision making procedure to be
followed for the establishment of the position of the Union when voting
Regulations to be adopted by the UNECE and the conclusion of agreements between
the Union and international organisations.
·                        
Existing provisions in the area of the
proposal
By Council Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement
concerning the establishing of global technical regulations for wheeled
vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled
vehicles ("Parallel Agreement")[3] the Union has acceded to the Parallel Agreement.
·                        
Consistency with the other policies and
objectives of the Union
The proposal is in line with the objectives
of the common trade policy in accordance with Article 217 TFEU. The participation
of the Union at the work of the UNECE helps developing and strengthening the
international harmonisation of vehicle-related technical regulations, contributing
to facilitate international trade in motor vehicles. The 1958 Agreement plays a
key role in this objective since manufacturers can operate a common set of
type-approval standards knowing that their products will be recognised by many
countries on different continents as being in conformity with their national
legislation. International regulatory harmonisation is thus one of the most
effective means to prevent obstacles to trade.
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS WITH THE
INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
 ·                         Consultation of interested parties 
 In developing the proposal the European Commission has consulted stakeholders, in the framework of the Technical Committee – Motor Vehicles. ·                         Impact assessment No Impact Assessment was conducted for this proposal. 
3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL
·                        
Summary of the proposed action
The proposal amends Council Decision 2000/125/EC
to reflect the changes introduced by the TFEU to the decision making procedure
to be followed for the establishment of the position of the Union when voting
Regulations to be adopted by the UNECE and the conclusion of agreements between
the Union and international organisations.
·                        
Legal basis
Considering the legal basis for the Council
act being amended was Articles 95 and 133 in conjunction with Article 300(2),
first sentence, Article 300(3), second subparagraph, of the Treaty establishing
the European Community, the legal basis of the proposal is Article 207(3) in
conjunction with Article 218(6)(a)(v) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the
European Union.
·                        
Subsidiarity principle
The vote in favour of international
instruments like draft UNECE Regulations and their incorporation into the Union
system for the type-approval of motor vehicles can only be done by the Union. This
does not only prevent fragmentation of the Internal Market, but also ensures
equal health and safety standards across the EU. It also offers advantages of
economies of scale: products can be made for the whole European market and even
the international market, instead of being customised to obtain national
type-approval for every single Member State.
The proposal therefore complies with the
subsidiarity principle.
·                        
Proportionality principle
The proposal complies with the
proportionality principle as it does not go beyond what is necessary in order
to achieve the objectives of ensuring the proper functioning of the Internal
Market while at the same time providing for a high level of public safety and
protection.
·                        
Choice of instruments
Proposed instrument: Council Decision.
The use of a Council Decision is considered
to be appropriate as in line with the requirements of Article 218(6) TFEU.
4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION
The proposal has no implication for the
Union budget.
5.           OPTIONAL ELEMENTS
·                        
European Economic Area
The proposed act does not concern an EEA
matter and should therefore not extend to the European Economic Area.
2012/0098 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
amending Council Decision 2000/125/EC of
31 January 2000 concerning the conclusion of the Agreement concerning the
establishing of global technical regulations for wheeled vehicles, equipment
and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on wheeled vehicles
("Parallel Agreement")
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union and in particular Articles 207(3) and
218(6)(a)(v) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
Having regard to the consent of the
European Parliament[4], 
Whereas:
(1)       By Council Decision 2000/125/EC of 31 January 2000 concerning the conclusion of the
Agreement concerning the establishing of global technical regulations for
wheeled vehicles, equipment and parts which can be fitted and/or be used on
wheeled vehicles ("Parallel Agreement")[5] the Union has acceded to the Parallel Agreement, in the framework
of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE).
(2)       Directive
2007/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 September 2007 establishing a framework for the approval of
motor vehicles and their trailers, and of systems, components and separate
technical units intended for such vehicles (Framework Directive)[6]
replaced the Member States’ approval systems with a Union approval
procedure, establishing a harmonised framework containing
the administrative provisions and general technical requirements for all new
vehicles, systems, components and separate technical units. That Directive
incorporated UNECE Regulations in the EU vehicle type-approval system, either
as requirements for type-approval or as alternatives to EU legislation. Since
the adoption of Directive 2007/46/EC, UNECE Regulations have increasingly
replaced EU legislation in the framework of EU vehicle type-approval.
(3)       The changes to the
Treaties occurred after the adoption of Decision 97/836/EC and in particular
the adoption of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union have
substantially altered the decision-making procedure to be followed for the
conclusion of Agreements between the Union and international organisations,
making it necessary to adapt Decision 2000/125/EC to the new procedures. 
(4)       The procedure for
establishing the position to be adopted on the Union's behalf in the United
Nations should also be adapted to the procedure set out in the Treaty and
therefore it is appropriate to follow the procedure set out in Article 218(9) of
the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
(5)       Therefore, Decision 2000/125/EC should be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Decision 2000/125/EC is amended as follows:
(1)          Article 5 is amended as follows:
(a)     Paragraph 1 is replaced by the
following:
"1. The Union shall vote in favour of
establishing any draft global technical regulation or a draft amendment to such
a regulation if the Union's vote in favour of the parallel draft technical
regulation has been decided in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 218(9) of the Treaty.";
(b)     Paragraph 3 is
replaced by the following:
"3. The position of the Union with regard to
the listing and reaffirmation of listing in the compendium of candidate
technical regulations as well as with regard to issue resolution between
Contracting Parties shall be established in accordance with the procedure laid
down in Article 39(9) of Directive 2007/46/EC.";
(2)          Article 6 is replaced by the
following:
"Article 6 
1.      The Union shall vote in favour of a
proposed amendment to the Parallel Agreement where the proposed amendment has
been approved in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 218(6)(a)(v) of the
Treaty.
Where that procedure has not been completed in
time before the vote takes place the Commission shall vote against the
amendment on behalf of the Union.
2.      The Decision to express an objection to
an amendment to the Parallel Agreement shall be taken in accordance with the
procedure laid down in Article 39(9) of Directive
2007/46/EC.".
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the
third day following its publication in the Official Journal of the European
Union.
Article 3
This Decision shall be notified by the
Commission to the Secretary-General of the United Nations.
Done at Brussels, 
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
[1]               Regulation (EC) No 661/2009 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning type-approval
requirements for the general safety of motor vehicles, their trailers and
systems, components and separate technical units intended therefor ( OJ L 200,
31.7.2009 )
[2]               OJ L 35, 10.2.2000, p.12.
[3]               OJ L 35, 10.2.2000, p.12.
[4]               OJ (…) (not yet published).
[5]               OJ L 35, 10.2.2000, p.12.
[6]               OJ L 263, 24.02.2011, p.1.