CELEX: 62015CN0668
Language: en
Date: 2015-12-14 00:00:00
Title: Case C-668/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 14 December 2015 — Jyske Finans A/S v Ligebehandlingsnævnet, acting on behalf of Ismar Huskic

22.2.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 68/23
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 14 December 2015 — Jyske Finans A/S v Ligebehandlingsnævnet, acting on behalf of Ismar Huskic
   (Case C-668/15)
   (2016/C 068/31)
   Language of the case: Danish
   
      Referring court
   
   Vestre Landsret
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Jyske Finans A/S
   
      Defendant: Ligebehandlingsnævnet, acting on behalf of Ismar Huskic
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Must the prohibition on direct discrimination on grounds of ethnic origin in Article 2(2)(a) of Council Directive 2000/43/EC (1) of 29 June 2000 implementing the principle of equal treatment between persons irrespective of racial or ethnic origin be interpreted as precluding a practice such as the one in the present case, by which persons in an equivalent situation who are born outside the Nordic countries, a Member State, Switzerland and Liechtenstein are treated less favourably than persons born in the Nordic countries, a Member State, Switzerland and Liechtenstein?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               If the first question is answered in the negative: does such a practice thus give rise to indirect discrimination on grounds of ethnic origin within the meaning of Article 2(2)(b) of Council Directive 2000/43/EC — unless it is objectively justified by a legitimate aim and the means of achieving that aim are appropriate and necessary?
            
         
               3.
            
            
               If the second question is answered in the affirmative, can such a practice in principle be justified as an appropriate and necessary means for safeguarding the enhanced customer due diligence measures provided for in Article 13 of Directive 2005/60/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing?
            
         
      (1)  OJ 2000 L 180, p. 22.
   
      (2)  OJ 2005 L 309, p. 15.