CELEX: 62021TB0077
Language: en
Date: 2021-11-11 00:00:00
Title: Case T-77/21: Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — QC v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Pension — Transfer of national pension rights — Decision establishing the number of pensionable years of service — Circumscribed powers — Action for annulment and for damages — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law — No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations — Inadmissibility — Request for directions to be issued — Clear lack of jurisdiction)

17.1.2022   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 24/38
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 11 November 2021 — QC v Commission
      (Case T-77/21) (1)
      
      (Civil service - Officials - Pension - Transfer of national pension rights - Decision establishing the number of pensionable years of service - Circumscribed powers - Action for annulment and for damages - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law - No action brought for failure to fulfil obligations - Inadmissibility - Request for directions to be issued - Clear lack of jurisdiction)
      (2022/C 24/51)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: QC (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Martin, B. Mongin and M. Brauhoff, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the notice of 6 April 2020 establishing the pension rights and, second, compensation for the material and non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The action is dismissed, in part as manifestly lacking any foundation in law, in part as being inadmissible and, in part, on account of the fact that the Court clearly does not have jurisdiction to hear and rule on the action.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  QC is ordered to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 138, 19.4.2021.