CELEX: C2001/028/01
Language: en
Date: 2001-01-27 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 19 October 2000 in Case C-155/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Pretore di Treviso, Sezione Distaccata di Oderzo): Giuseppe Busolin and Others v Ispettorato Centrale Repressione Frodi — Ufficio di Conegliano — Ministero delle Risorse Agricole, Alimentari e Forestali (Agriculture — Common organisation of the agricultural markets — Market in wine — Compulsory distillation scheme)

27.1.2001               EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                                  C 28/1
                                                                         I
                                                                   (Information)
                                                     COURT OF JUSTICE
                                                               COURT OF JUSTICE
                 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT                                       Examination of the questions raised has disclosed no factor of such a
                                                                             kind as to affect the validity of Article 39(3), (4) and (11) of Council
                          (First Chamber)                                    Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March 1987 on the common
                                                                             organisation of the market in wine, as amended by Council Regulation
                       of 19 October 2000                                    (EEC) No 1566/93 of 14 June 1993, or of Commission Regulation
                                                                             (EC) No 343/94 of 15 February 1994 opening compulsory
in Case C-155/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from                    distillation as provided for in Article 39 of Council Regulation (EEC)
the Pretore di Treviso, Sezione Distaccata di Oderzo):                       No 822/87 and derogating for the 1993/94 wine year from certain
Giuseppe Busolin and Others v Ispettorato Centrale                           detailed rules for the application thereof.
Repressione Frodi — Ufficio di Conegliano — Ministero
       delle Risorse Agricole, Alimentari e Forestali (1)
                                                                             (1) OJ C 204 of 17.7.1999.
(Agriculture — Common organisation of the agricultural
markets — Market in wine — Compulsory distillation
                               scheme)
                           (2001/C 28/01)
                    (Language of the case: Italian)                                            JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                                                         (First Chamber)
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
                   in the European Court Reports)
                                                                                                      of 7 November 2000
In Case C-155/99: reference to the Court under Article 177 of
the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) from the Pretore di Treviso,              in Case C-168/98: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg v Euro-
Sezione Distaccata di Oderzo (Treviso Magistrates’ Court,                                              pean Parliament (1)
Oderzo Division), Italy, for a preliminary ruling in the
proceedings pending before that court between Giuseppe                       (Action for annulment — Freedom of establishment —
Busolin and Others and Ispettorato Centrale Repressione Frodi                Mutual recognition of diplomas — Harmonisation — Obli-
— Ufficio di Conegliano — Ministero, delle Risorse Agricole,                 gation to state reasons — Directive 98/5/EC — Practice of
Alimentari c Forestali — on the validity of Article 39(3), (4)               the profession of lawyer on a permanent basis in a Member
and (11) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 of 16 March                   State other than that in which the qualification was acquired)
1987 on the common organisation of the market in wine (OJ
1987 L 84, p. 1), as amended by Council Regulation (EEC)
No 1566/93 of 14 June 1993 (OJ 1993 L 154, p. 39), and of                                                 (2001/C 28/02)
Commission Regulation (EC) No 343/94 of 15 February 1994
opening compulsory distillation as provided for in Article 39
of Council Regulation (EEC) No 822/87 and derogating for                                           (Language of the case: French)
the 1993/94 wine year from certain detailed rules for the
application thereof (OJ 1994 L 44, p. 9) — the Court
(First Chamber), composed of: M. Wathelet, President of the                  (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
Chamber, A. La Pergola, and P. Jann (Rapporteur), Judges;                                         in the European Court Reports)
G. Cosmas, Advocate General; D. Louterman-Hubeau, Principal
Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on                    In Case C-168/98: Grand Duchy of Luxembourg (Agents:
19 October 2000, in which it has ruled:                                      originally represented by N. Schmit and subsequently by