CELEX: 62010CO0432
Language: en
Date: 2011-01-20 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2011. # Criminal proceedings against Aboulkacem Chihabi and Others. # Reference for a preliminary ruling: Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen - Belgium. # Reference for a preliminary ruling -Manifest inadmissibility. # Case C-432/10.

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 20 January 2011 – Chihabi and Others v Geert Vandendriessche, acting in his capacity
            as receiver of Anneessen BVBA
      (Case C-432/10)
      Reference for a preliminary ruling – Manifest inadmissibility
      Preliminary rulings – Admissibility – Questions referred without sufficient information on the factual and legislative context (Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court
         of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 92(1) and 103(1)) (see paras 18-23)
      
      Re:
      
         
               Reference for a preliminary ruling – Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen – Interpretation of Articles 5, 38 to 41 and
                  43, second indent of Article 177 and Articles 202(1) and (3) and 221(1) and (3) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of
                  12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) and of Article 199(1) of Commission Regulation
                  (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing
                  the Community Customs Code (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1) – Post-clearance recovery of import or export duties – Communication to the
                  debtor – Creation of a customs debt following the unlawful introduction of goods.
               
            Operative part
      
         
                   
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank van eerste aanleg te Antwerpen, made by decision of 31 May 2007,
                     is manifestly inadmissible.