CELEX: 62014TN0728
Language: en
Date: 2014-10-10 00:00:00
Title: Case T-728/14: Action brought on 10 October 2014 — Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition v OHIM — H. Young Holdings (animal)

1.12.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 431/44
            
         Action brought on 10 October 2014 — Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition v OHIM — H. Young Holdings (animal)
   (Case T-728/14)
   (2014/C 431/69)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Universal Protein Supplements Corp. d/b/a Universal Nutrition (New Brunswick, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: H. Young Holdings plc (Newbury, United Kingdom)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘animal’ — Community trade mark No 2 8 24  548
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 31 July 2014 in Case R 2058/2013-1
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM and the other party to pay their own costs and those of the applicant.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 37(b)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95.