CELEX: 62011TB0213
Language: en
Date: 2011-07-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-213/11 P(I): Order of the President of the General Court of 15 July 2011 — College of staff representatives of the EIB and Others v Bömcke (Appeal — Civil Service — Application to intervene before the Civil Service Tribunal — Calculation of time limit — Out of time)

24.9.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 282/23
            
         Order of the President of the General Court of 15 July 2011 — College of staff representatives of the EIB and Others v Bömcke
   (Case T-213/11 P(I)) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Civil Service - Application to intervene before the Civil Service Tribunal - Calculation of time limit - Out of time)
   2011/C 282/47
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellants: College of staff representatives of the European Investment Bank (Luxembourg, Luxembourg); Jean-Pierre Bodson (Luxembourg); Evangelos Kourgias (Senningerberg, Luxembourg); Manuel Sutil (Nondkeil, France); Patrick Vanhoudt (Gonderange, Luxembourg); Marie-Christel Heger (Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Wilson, A. Senes and B. Entringer, lawyers)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Eberhard Bömcke (Athus, Belgium) (represented by: D. Lagasse, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union of 17 March 2011 in Case F-95/10 INT Bömcke v EIB, not published in the ECR, seeking to have that order set aside.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The College of staff representatives of the European Investment Bank, Jean-Pierre Bodson, Evangelos Kourgias, Manuel Sutil, Patrick Vanhoudt and Marie-Christel Heger are ordered to bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 152, 21.5.2011.