CELEX: 62017CA0305
Language: en
Date: 2018-12-06 00:00:00
Title: Case C-305/17: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava — Slovakia) — FENS spol. s r.o. v Slovenská republika — Úrad pre reguláciu sieťových odvetví (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Free movement of goods — Customs duties — Charges having equivalent effect — Levy on the transmission of electricity generated domestically and intended for export — Compatibility of such legislation with the principle of free movement of goods)

4.2.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 44/2
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 6 December 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okresný súd Bratislava — Slovakia) — FENS spol. s r.o. v Slovenská republika — Úrad pre reguláciu sieťových odvetví
      (Case C-305/17) (1)
      
      ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Free movement of goods - Customs duties - Charges having equivalent effect - Levy on the transmission of electricity generated domestically and intended for export - Compatibility of such legislation with the principle of free movement of goods))
      (2019/C 44/02)
      Language of the case: Slovak
      
         Referring court
      
      Okresný súd Bratislava
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: FENS spol. s r.o.
      
         Defendant: Slovenská republika — Úrad pre reguláciu sieťových odvetví
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      Articles 28 TFEU and 30 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which provides for a pecuniary charge, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which is imposed on electricity exported to another Member State or to a third country only in the case where that electricity was generated within the national territory.
      
         (1)  OJ C 269, 14.8.2017.