CELEX: 62013CA0533
Language: en
Date: 2015-03-17 00:00:00
Title: Case C-533/13: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin — Finland) — Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry v Öljytuote ry, Shell Aviation Finland Oy (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2008/104/EC — Temporary agency work — Article 4(1) — Prohibitions or restrictions on the use of temporary agency work — Justification — Grounds of general interest — Obligation to review — Scope)

11.5.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 155/5
            
         Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 17 March 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Työtuomioistuin — Finland) — Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry v Öljytuote ry, Shell Aviation Finland Oy
   (Case C-533/13) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 2008/104/EC - Temporary agency work - Article 4(1) - Prohibitions or restrictions on the use of temporary agency work - Justification - Grounds of general interest - Obligation to review - Scope))
   (2015/C 155/05)
   Language of the case: Finnish
   
      Referring court
   
   Työtuomioistuin
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Auto- ja Kuljetusalan Työntekijäliitto AKT ry
   
      Defendants: Öljytuote ry, Shell Aviation Finland Oy
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Article 4(1) of Directive 2008/104/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on temporary agency work must be interpreted as meaning that:
   
               —
            
            
               the provision is addressed only to the competent authorities of the Member States, imposing on them an obligation to review in order to ensure that any potential prohibitions or restrictions on the use of temporary agency work are justified, and, therefore,
            
         
               —
            
            
               the provision does not impose an obligation on national courts not to apply any rule of national law containing prohibitions or restrictions on the use of temporary agency work which are not justified on grounds of general interest within the meaning of Article 4(1).
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 352, 30.11.2013.