CELEX: 52012PC0687
Language: en
Date: 2012-11-23
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION fixing for the 2013 fishing year the guide prices and Union producer prices for certain fishery products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000

|
			
		
		
		52012PC0687
		
			Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION fixing for the 2013 fishing year the guide prices and Union producer prices for certain fishery products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 /* COM/2012/0687 final - 2012/0322 (NLE) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
 1)                          Context of the proposal ·                     110                  Grounds for and objectives of the proposal The immediate objective of this proposal is to enable the Council to discharge its regulatory obligation to determine the guide prices and the Union producer price for the fishing year 2013. The wider objective of this proposal is thus to ensure the functioning of the price support and intervention mechanisms laid down in Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 during the fishing year in question. ·                     120                  General context Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 establishes a Common Organisation of the Markets in Fishery and Aquaculture Products, which pertains to the market- and trade-related aspects of the Common Fisheries Policy and thus also serves to implement the objectives enshrined in Article 39 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Specific price support and intervention mechanisms are one important component of the Common Market Organisation. In this context, Article 43(3) of the Treaty empowers the Council to adopt, upon a proposal from the Commission, measures on the fixing of prices. This concerns the guide prices for a specified number of fishery products of EU importance as well as the Union producer price for specified tuna products. The guide prices form the reference for the subsequent fixing, by way of Commission implementing regulations, of the different technical parameters needed for the operation of the intervention mechanisms. The Union producer price is of relevance for the compensatory allowance for tuna delivered to the processing industry, which might be triggered when prices on the world markets fall below a specified trigger level. Pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, the relevant prices shall follow both the development of market prices during the three preceding fishing years as well as trends in production and demand. In line with that, the proposal is for adjustments of between -1% and +1.5% for most whitefish species; for increases between +1.5% and +2.5% for a majority of pelagic species; and for increases between +0.5% and +3% for most crustaceans. In the field of frozen species, the proposal reflects increases between +1% and +3% for a majority of products. Finally, the proposal is for increasing the Union producer price for tuna products by +2%. ·                     130                  Existing provisions in the area of the proposal Council Regulation (EU) No 1388/2011 fixing for the 2012 fishing year the guide prices and Union producer prices for certain fishery products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000. ·                     140                  Consistency with the other policies and objectives of the Union The functioning of the Common Market Organisation set up by Council Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 and the discharge of the regulatory obligations pertaining thereto also serve to implement the objectives enshrined in Article 39 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. 2)                          Consultation of interested parties and impact assessment ·                               Consultation of interested parties 211                  Consultation methods, main sectors targeted and general profile of respondents The Examination Committee for Fishery Products and the Advisory Committee on Fisheries and Aquaculture. 212                  Summary of responses and how they have been taken into account The views of both Committees have provided valuable input to the Commission's market analysis. ·                               Collection and use of expertise 221                  Scientific/expertise domains concerned Markets in fishery products. 222                  Methodology used Open consultation. 223                  Main organisations/experts consulted Experts representing the Member States at the Examination Committee for Fishery Products. Experts representing all major groups of EU stakeholders at the Advisory Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture. 2249                Summary of advice received and used The existence of potentially serious risks with irreversible consequences has not been mentionned. 225                  Advices are usually reflected in the proposal fixing the guide prices and Union producer prices. 226                  Means used to make the expert advice publicly available Minutes of the meetings of the Examination Committee for Fishery Products and the Advisory Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture. ·                     230                  Impact assessment Considering the specific nature of the proposal, namely the annual determination of relevant prices pursuant to the provisos of the Common Market Organisation in its present version, an impact assessment is not required. The proposal is nevertheless based on a regular monitoring on interventions in the preceding fishing years and a thorough analysis of the market situation for each one of the relevant fishery products. 3)                          Legal elements of the proposal ·                     305                  Summary of the proposed action Proposal for a Council Regulation fixing for the 2013 fishing year the guide prices and Union producer prices for certain fishery products. ·                     310                  Legal basis Article 43(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. ·                     329                  Subsidiarity principle The proposal falls under the exclusive competence of the Community. The subsidiarity principle therefore does not apply. ·                                 Proportionality principle The proposal complies with the proportionality principle for the following reason(s). 331                  The attainment of the Single Market in the field of fisheries products requires the fixation of guide prices. The Common Market Organisation provides for specific intervention mechanisms but forces none of the relevant actors (producer organisations) to have recourse to intervention. 332                  The Common Market Organisation has considerably decreased both the attractiveness of intervention in the form of wasteful withdrawals as well as the corresponding financial means. ·                               Choice of instruments 341                  Proposed instruments: regulation. 342                  Other means would not be adequate for the following reason(s). The guide prices and Union producer prices shall be fixed by the Council acting on a qualified majority on a proposal from the Commission. A regulation is required to ensure direct applicability and uniformity throughout the EU. 4)                          Budgetary implication 401                  Since this is a price-fixing exercise, the impact on expenditure is indirect and will largely depend on developments in the market situation and on quantities of fishery products landed.   
2012/0322 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL REGULATION
fixing for the 2013 fishing year the guide
prices and Union producer prices for certain fishery products pursuant to Regulation
(EC) No 104/2000
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard
to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular
Article 43(3) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
Whereas:
(1)       Article 43(3) of the
Treaty provides that the Council, on a proposal from the Commission, is to
adopt measures on the fixing of prices.
(2)       Regulation (EC) No
104/2000 of 17 December 1999 on the common
organisation of the markets in fishery and aquaculture products[1]
requires that guide prices and Union producer prices for each fishing year be
fixed in order to determine price levels for intervention on the market for
certain fisheries products.
(3)       It is incumbent upon the
Council to fix the guide prices for each of the products and groups of products
listed in Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, and the Union
producer prices for the products listed in Annex III to that Regulation.
(4)       On the basis of the data
currently available on the prices for the products concerned and the criteria laid
down in Article 18(2) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000, the guide prices should
be increased, maintained or reduced for the 2013 fishing year depending on the
species.
(5)       It is appropriate to
establish the Union producer price for one of the products listed in Annex III
to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 and to calculate the Union producer prices for
the others by means of the conversion factors established by Commission
Regulation (EC) No 802/2006 of 30 May 2006 fixing the conversion factors
applicable to fish of the genera Thunnus and Euthynnus[2].
(6)       On the basis of the
criteria laid down in the first and second indent of Article 18(2) and in accordance
with the procedure laid down in Article 26(1) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000,
the Union producer price for the 2013 fishing year should be fixed,
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
For the
fishing year from 1 January to 31 December 2013, the guide prices as provided
for in Article 18(1) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 shall be as set out in
Annex I to this Regulation.
Article 2
For the
fishing year from 1 January to 31 December 2013,
the Union producer prices as provided for in Article 26(1) of Regulation (EC) No 104/2000 shall be as
set out in Annex II to this Regulation.
Article 3
This
Regulation shall enter into force on 1 January 2013.
This Regulation shall be binding in its
entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
ANNEX I
Products
listed in Annexes I and II to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000
 Annexes || Species || Commercial presentation || Guide price (EUR/tonne) 
 I || 1. Herring of the species Clupea harengus || Whole fish || 289 
   || 2. Sardines of the species Sardina pilchardus || Whole fish || 588 
   || 3. Dogfish (Squalus acanthias) || Whole fish or Gutted fish with head || 1157 
   || 4. Spotted dogfish (Scyliorhinus spp.) || Whole fish or Gutted fish with head || 704 
   || 5. Redfish (Sebastes spp.) || Whole fish || 1230 
   || 6. Cod of the species Gadus morhua || Whole fish or gutted fish with head || 1613 
   || 7. Saithe (Pollachius virens) || Whole fish or gutted fish with head || 827 
   || 8. Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus) || Whole fish or gutted fish with head || 975 
   || 9. Whiting (Merlangius merlangus) || Whole fish or gutted fish with head || 916 
   || 10. Ling (Molva spp.) || Whole fish or gutted fish with head || 1176 
   || 11. Mackerel of the species Scomber scombrus || Whole fish || 336 
   || 12. Mackerel of the species Scomber japonicus || Whole fish || 294 
   || 13. Anchovy (Engraulis spp.) || Whole fish || 1287 
   || 14. Plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) || Whole fish or gutted fish with head from 1.1.2013 to 30.4.2013 || 1021 
   ||   || Whole fish or gutted fish with head from 1.5.2013 to 31.12.2013 || 1411 
   || 15. Hake of the species Merluccius merluccius || Whole fish or gutted fish with head || 3235 
   || 16. Megrim (Lepidorhombus spp.) || Whole fish or gutted fish with head         || 2389 
   || 17. Dab (Limanda limanda) || Whole fish or gutted fish with head || 795 
   || 18. Common flounder (Platichthys flesus) || Whole fish or gutted fish with head || 508 
   || 19. Albacore or longfinned tunas (Thunnus alalunga) || Whole fish || 2343 
   ||   || Gutted fish with head || 2388 
   || 20. Cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis and Rossia macrosoma) || Whole || 1826 
   || 21. Monkfish (Lophius spp.) || Whole fish or gutted fish with head || 2893 
   ||   || Without head || 6015 
   || 22. Shrimp of the species Crangon crangon || Simply boiled in water || 2446 
   || 23. Northern prawn (Pandalus borealis) || Simply boiled in water || 7005 
   ||   || Fresh or chilled || 1638 
   || 24. Edible crab (Cancer pagurus) || Whole || 1718 
   || 25. Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus) || Whole || 5222 
   ||   || Tails || 4160 
   || 26. Sole (Solea spp.) || Whole fish or gutted fish with head || 6876 
 II || 1. Greenland halibut (Reinhardtius hippoglossoides) || Frozen, in original packages containing the same products || 1974 
   || 2. Hake of the genus Merluccius spp. || Frozen, whole, in original packages containing the same products || 1270 
   ||   || Frozen, filleted, in original packages containing the same products || 1513 
   || 3. Sea bream (Dentex dentex and Pagellus spp.) || Frozen, in lots or in original packages containing the same products || 1461 
   || 4. Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) || Frozen, whole, in original packages containing the same products || 4098 
   || 5. Cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) (Rossia macrosoma) (Sepiola rondeletti) || Frozen, in original packages containing the same products || 2002 
   || 6. Octopus (Octopus spp.) || Frozen, in original packages containing the same products || 2293 
   || 7. Squid (Loligo spp.) || Frozen, in original packages containing the same products || 1203 
   || 8. Squid (Ommastrephes sagittatus) || Frozen, in original packages containing the same products || 961 
   || 9. Illex argentinus || Frozen, in original packages containing the same products || 886 
   || 10. Prawn of the family Penaeidae - Prawn of the species Parapenaeus longirostris   ||   Frozen, in original packages containing the same products || 4070 
   || - Other species of the family Penaeidae || Frozen, in original packages containing the same products || 7813 
ANNEX II
Products
listed in Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000
 Species || Weight || Commercial specifications || Community producer price (EUR/tonne) 
 Yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares) || weighing more than 10 kg each || Whole || 1248 
 Gilled and gutted ||   
 Other ||   
 weighing not more than 10 kg each || Whole ||   
 Gilled and gutted ||   
 Other ||   
 Albacore (Thunnus alalunga) || weighing more than 10 kg each || Whole ||   
 Gilled and gutted ||   
 Other ||   
 weighing not more than 10 kg each || Whole ||   
 Gilled and gutted ||   
 Other ||   
 Skipjack (Katsuwonus pelamis) ||   || Whole ||   
   || Gilled and gutted ||   
   || Other ||   
 Bluefin tuna (Thunnus thynnus) ||   || Whole ||   
   || Gilled and gutted ||   
   || Other ||   
 Other species of the genera Thunnus and Euthynnus ||   || Whole ||   
   || Gilled and gutted ||   
   || Other ||   
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR PROPOSALS
[to be used for any proposal or initiative submitted to the
legislative authority
(Articles 28 of the Financial Regulation and 22 of the
implementing rules)]
1.         FRAMEWORK OF THE
PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
            1.1.      Title of the proposal/initiative 
            1.2.      Policy
area(s) concerned in the ABM/ABB structure
            1.3.      Nature
of the proposal/initiative 
            1.4.      Objective(s)

            1.5.      Grounds
for the proposal/initiative 
            1.6.      Duration
and financial impact 
            1.7.      Management
method(s) envisaged 
2.         MANAGEMENT MEASURES 
            2.1.      Monitoring
and reporting rules 
            2.2.      Management
and control system 
            2.3.      Measures
to prevent fraud and irregularities 
3.         ESTIMATED FINANCIAL
IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
            3.1.      Heading(s)
of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected 
            3.2.      Estimated
impact on expenditure 
            3.2.1.   Summary
of estimated impact on expenditure 
            3.2.2.   Estimated
impact on operational appropriations 
            3.2.3.   Estimated
impact on appropriations of an administrative nature
            3.2.4.   Compatibility
with the current multiannual financial framework
            3.2.5.   Third-party
participation in financing 
            3.3.      Estimated impact on revenue
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT FOR PROPOSALS
FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE

Title of
the proposal/initiative 
Proposal for a Council Regulation fixing for the 2013
fishing year the guide prices and Union producer prices for certain fishery
products pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 104/2000
Policy
area(s) concerned in the ABM/ABB structure[3] 
Policy Area 11: Fisheries and Maritime Affairs
Nature of
the proposal/initiative 
¨ The
proposal/initiative relates to a new action 
¨ The
proposal/initiative relates to a new action following a pilot
project/preparatory action[4] 
x The proposal/initiative relates to the
extension of an existing action 
¨ The
proposal/initiative relates to an action redirected towards a new action 
Objectives
The
Commission's multiannual strategic objective(s) targeted by the
proposal/initiative 
Resource efficient Europe
Specific
objective(s) and ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned 
Specific
objective No 1
To contribute to the objectives laid down by the Treaty
(Article 39) by increasing the sustainability of fishing activities, ensuring
minimum incomes for the producers, stabilisation of the market, availability of
supply and reasonable prices for the consumers, and compensating the additional
costs incurred in the marketing of fishery products from the outermost regions.
ABM/ABB
activity(ies) concerned
Activity ABB 11 02: Fisheries markets
Expected
result(s) and impact
Specify the
effects which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups
targeted.
Prevalence of carry-over operations over withdrawals
Guide price fluctuations remain limited (between +3% and
-3%).
Indicators
of results and impact 
Specify the
indicators for monitoring implementation of the proposal/initiative.
Level of carry-over operations and withdrawals of fishery
products
Evolution of guide prices of fishery products
Grounds
for the proposal/initiative 
Requirement(s)
to be met in the short or long term 
The interventions concerning fishery products are carried
out under the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) in accordance with Article 40 of
the TFEU. They aim at providing stability to the EU markets by preventing
possible risks of crisis. In this context, appropriate price and supply
policies are of utmost importance. The interest of the production and marketing
chain and the need to strengthen the competitiveness of the sector in a context
of globalisation must be taken into account. The objective of market stability
together with the support to producers’ income can essentially be achieved
through the different mechanisms of intervention on the markets, e.g.
withdrawals, carry-over, compensatory allowance. The interest of the consumers
must also be considered
Added
value of EU involvement
The question of subsidiarity is not relevant to this
proposal since intervention falls within the exclusive competence of the EU.
The added value of EU intervention is directly related to the underlying
arguments of the existence of a Common Organisation of the Markets in fishery
and aquaculture products
Lessons
learned from similar experiences in the past
The yearly fixation of the guide prices and the Union
producer price contribute to the attainment of the Single Market in the field
of fisheries products
The Common Market Organisation has considerably decreased
both the attractiveness of intervention in the form of wasteful withdrawals as
well as the corresponding financial means
Coherence
and possible synergy with other relevant instruments
Price support and intervention mechanisms are one important
component of the Common Market Organisation. The guide prices provide the basis
for the subsequent fixing of the different parameters needed for the operation
of the intervention mechanisms for the fishing year concerned. Similarly, the
Union producer price forms the basis for the granting of the compensatory
allowance for tuna which might be triggered depending on the development of
prices on the world markets
Duration
and financial impact 
x Proposal/initiative of limited
duration 
x        Proposal/initiative in effect from 01/01/2013 to 31/12/2013 
¨         Financial impact from YYYY to YYYY 
¨ Proposal/initiative of unlimited
duration
Implementation with a start-up period from
YYYY to YYYY,
followed by full-scale operation.
Management
mode(s) envisaged[5] 
x Centralised direct management by the Commission 
¨ Centralised indirect management with the delegation of implementation tasks to:
¨         executive agencies 
¨         bodies set up by the Communities[6] 
¨         national public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service
mission 
¨         persons entrusted with the implementation of specific
actions pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union and identified in
the relevant basic act within the meaning of Article 49 of the Financial
Regulation 
¨ Shared management with the Member States 
¨ Decentralised management with third countries 
¨ Joint management with international organisations (to be specified)
If more than one
management mode is indicated, please provide details in the
"Comments" section.
Comments 
As of 16 October 2006, the measures financed under the
budget heading 11.02.01 are implemented in a centralised manner pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1290/2005 on the
financing of the common agricultural policy. Furthermore, the management of data notified by the Member
States in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 248/2009 is the sole
responsibility of the Commission
MANAGEMENT MEASURES 
Monitoring
and reporting rules 
Specify
frequency and conditions.
The monitoring of the envisaged measures is ensured through
the collection and the analysis of data notified by the Member States by way of
the FIDES system in accordance with Commission Regulation (EC) No 248/2009
Management
and control system 
Risk(s)
identified 
[…]
[…]
Control
method(s) envisaged 
The proposal is based on regular monitoring of interventions
in previous fishing years and thorough analysis of the market situation for the
relevant products
Measures
to prevent fraud and irregularities 
Specify
existing or envisaged prevention and protection measures.
The anti-fraud measures are in conformity with the
provisions laid down in Regulation (CE) No 104/2000 and, in particular, with
the provisions laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 595/91 concerning
irregularities and the recovery of sums wrongly paid
ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE
PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
Heading(s)
of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected 
Existing expenditure budget lines 
In order of
multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
 Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution 
 Number [Description………………………………..] || DA/NDA ([7]) || from EFTA[8] countries || from candidate countries[9] || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 18(1)(aa) of the Financial Regulation 
 2 || 11 02 01 01 Interventions in fishery products || DA/DNA || YES/NO || YES/NO || YES/NO || YES/NO 
New budget lines requested 
In order of multiannual financial framework
headings and budget lines.
 Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution 
 Number [Heading……………………………………..] || Diff./non-diff. || from EFTA countries || from candidate countries || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 18(1)(aa) of the Financial Regulation 
 […] || [XX.YY.YY.YY] […] || […] || YES/NO || YES/NO || YES/NO || YES/NO 
Estimated
impact on expenditure 
Summary
of estimated impact on expenditure 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Heading of multiannual financial framework: || Number || 2 
 DG: MARE ||   ||   || Year 2013 || Year 2014 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
  Operational appropriations ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Number of budget line        11 02 01 01 || Commitments || (1) || 10.650 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 10.650 
 Payments || (2) || 8.650 || 2.000 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 10.650 
 Number of budget line || Commitments || (1a) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (2a) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed  from the envelop of specific programs[10] ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Number of budget line ||   || (3) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations for DG MARE || Commitments || =1+1a +3 || 10.650 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 10.650 
 Payments || =2+2a +3 || 8.650 || 2.000 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 10.650 
  TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) || 10.650 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 10.650 
 Payments || (5) || 10.650 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 10.650 
  TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelop of specific programs || (6) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 2 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || =4+ 6 || 10.650 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 10.650 
 Payments || =5+ 6 || 8.650 || 2.000 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 10.650 
If more than one heading is affected by the proposal /
initiative:
  TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (5) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelop of specific programs || (6) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 4 of the multiannual financial framework (Reference amount) || Commitments || =4+ 6 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || =5+ 6 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Heading of multiannual financial framework: || 5 || " Administrative expenditure " 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
   ||   ||   || Year 2013 || Year 2014 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 DG: MARE || 
  Human resources || 0.254 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 0.254 
  Other administrative expenditure || 0.036 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 0.036 
 TOTAL DG MARE || Appropriations || 0.290 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 0.290 
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || (Total commitments = Total payments) || 0.290 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
   ||   ||   || Year 2013 || Year 2014 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 5 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || 10.940 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 10.940 
 Payments || 8.940 || 2.000 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 10.940 
Estimated
impact on operational appropriations 
¨         The proposal/initiative does not require the use of
operational appropriations 
x        The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational
appropriations, as explained below:
Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal
places)
 Indicate objectives and outputs   ò ||   ||   || Year 2013 || Year 2014 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 OUTPUTS 
 Type of output[11] || Average cost of the ouput || Number of ouputs || Cost || Number of ouputs || Cost || Number of ouputs || Cost || Number of ouputs || Cost || Number of ouputs || Cost || Number of ouputs || Cost || Number of ouputs || Cost || Total number of ouputs || Total cost 
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 1[12]… ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - Output 1 || Community withdrawals ||   || 3.000 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - Output 2 || Independent withd & carry-over ||   || 2.000 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - Output 3 || Private storage aid ||   || 0.750 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - Output 4 || Compensatory tuna allowance ||   || 0.750 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - Output 5 || Community carry-over ||   || 4.000 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - Output 6 || Technical assistance ||   || 0.150 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Sub-total for specific objective N°1 ||   || 10.650 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 2… ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - Output ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Sub-total for specific objective N°2 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL COST ||   || 10.650 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
Estimated
impact on appropriations of an administrative nature
Summary 
¨         The proposal/initiative does not require the use of
administrative appropriations 
x        The proposal/initiative requires the use of administrative
appropriations, as explained below:
EUR million (to 3
decimal places)
   || Year 2013 || Year 2014 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Human resources || 0.254 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Other administrative expenditure || 0.036 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Subtotal HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || 0.290 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Outside HEADING 5[13] of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Human resources ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Other expenditure of an administrative nature ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Subtotal outside HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL || 0.290 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Estimated
requirements of human resources 
¨         The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human
resources 
x        The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources,
as explained below:
Estimate to be expressed in full amounts
(or at most to one decimal place)
   || Year 2013 || Year 2014 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) 
  Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary agents) 
 XX 01 01 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) || 2 AST ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 XX 01 01 02 (Delegations) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 XX 01 05 01 (Indirect research) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 10 01 05 01 (Direct research) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  External personnel (in Full Time Equivalent unit: FTE)[14] 
 XX 01 02 01 (CA, INT, SNE from the "global envelope") ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 XX 01 02 02 (CA, INT, JED, LA and SNE in the delegations) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 XX 01 04 yy [15] || - at Headquarters[16] ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - in delegations ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 XX 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE - Indirect research) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 10 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE - Direct research) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Other budget lines (specify) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL || 2 AST ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
XX is the
policy area or budget title concerned.
The human
resources required will be met by staff from the DG who are already assigned to
management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if
necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing
DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary
constraints.
Description of
tasks to be carried out:
 Officials and temporary agents || Financial management of expenditure, follow-up and ex-post controls 
 External personnel ||   
Compatibility
with the current multiannual financial framework 
x        Proposal/initiative is compatible the current multiannual
financial framework.
¨         Proposal/initiative will entail reprogramming of the
relevant heading in the multiannual financial framework.
Explain what reprogramming is required, specifying the
budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
[…]
¨         Proposal/initiative requires application of the flexibility
instrument or revision of the multiannual financial framework[17].
Explain what is required, specifying the headings and
budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
[…]
Third-party
contributions 
x The proposal/initiative does not provide for co-financing by third
parties 
The proposal/initiative provides for the
co-financing estimated below:
Appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
   || Year 2013 || Year 2014 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || Total 
 Specify the co-financing body ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations cofinanced ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
Estimated
impact on revenue 
x        Proposal/initiative has no financial impact on revenue.
¨         Proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:
¨         on own resources 
¨         on miscellaneous revenue 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Budget revenue line: || Appropriations available for the ongoing budget exercise || Impact of the proposal/initiative[18] 
 Year 2013 || Year 2014 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … insert as many columns as necessary in order to reflect the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) 
 Article …………. ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
For miscellaneous
assigned revenue, specify the budget expenditure line(s) affected.
[…]
Specify the method
for calculating the impact on revenue.
[…]
[1]               OJ L 17, 21.1.2000, p. 22.
[2]               OJ L 144, 31.5.2006, p. 15.
[3]               ABM: Activity-Based Management – ABB: Activity-Based
Budgeting.
[4]               As referred to in Article 49(6)(a) or (b) of the
Financial Regulation.
[5]               Details of management modes and references to the
Financial Regulation may be found on the BudgWeb site: http://www.cc.cec/budg/man/budgmanag/budgmanag_en.html
[6]               As referred to in Article 185 of the Financial
Regulation.
[7]               DA= Differentiated appropriations / DNA=
Non-Differentiated Appropriations
[8]               EFTA: European Free Trade Association. 
[9]               Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential
candidate countries from the Western Balkans.
[10]             Technical and/or administrative assistance and
expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions
(former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.
[11]             Outputs are products and services to be supplied (e.g.:
number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.).
[12]             As described in Section 1.4.2. "Specific
objective(s)…"
[13]             Technical and/or administrative assistance and
expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions
(former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.
[14]             CA= Contract Agent; INT= agency staff ("Intérimaire");
JED= "Jeune Expert en Délégation" (Young Experts in
Delegations); LA= Local Agent; SNE= Seconded National Expert; 
[15]             Under
the ceiling for external personnel from operational
appropriations (former "BA" lines).
[16]             Essentially for Structural Funds, European Agricultural
Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and European Fisheries Fund (EFF).
[17]             See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional
Agreement.
[18]             As regards traditional own resources (customs duties,
sugar levies), the amounts indicated must be net amounts, i.e. gross amounts
after deduction of 25% for collection costs.