CELEX: 62009TB0401
Language: en
Date: 2010-07-06 00:00:00
Title: Case T-401/09: Order of the General Court of 6 July 2010 — Marcuccio v Court of Justice (Action for annulment — Rejection by the Court of Justice of a request for compensation — Action for damages — Service of an appeal to the applicant’s former representative — Absence of harm — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)

28.8.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 234/37
            
         Order of the General Court of 6 July 2010 — Marcuccio v Court of Justice
   (Case T-401/09) (1)
   
   (Action for annulment - Rejection by the Court of Justice of a request for compensation - Action for damages - Service of an appeal to the applicant’s former representative - Absence of harm - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly devoid of any basis in law)
   2010/C 234/67
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: A. Placco, acting as Agent)
   
      Re:
   
   Firstly, an action for annulment of the alleged rejection by the Court of Justice of the applicant’s request for damages by way of compensation for the damage suffered by the applicant as a result of an alleged irregularity in service on him of an appeal in Case T-20/09 P and, secondly, an action for damages
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Luigi Marcuccio is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               There is no need to adjudicate on the application of the European Commission for leave to intervene.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.