CELEX: C2004/228/52
Language: en
Date: 2004-09-11 00:00:00
Title: Case C-281/04 P: Appeal brought on 25 June 2004 by Michael Leighton, Graham French and John Neiger against the order made on 3 May 2004 by the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in case T-24/04 between Michael Leighton, Graham French and John Neiger and the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities.

11.9.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 228/25
            
         Appeal brought on 25 June 2004 by Michael Leighton, Graham French and John Neiger against the order made on 3 May 2004 by the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in case T-24/04 between Michael Leighton, Graham French and John Neiger and the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities.
   (Case C-281/04 P)
   (2004/C 228/52)
   An appeal against the order made on 3 May 2004 by the Fifth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities in case T-24/04 between Michael Leighton, Graham French and John Neiger and the Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities, was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 25 June 2004 by Michael Leighton, Graham French and John Neiger, represented by J.S. Barnett, Solicitor-Advocate.
   The Appellants claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               set aside the order
            
         
               —
            
            
               grant the relief sought by the Appellants in the form of the draft order annexed to the Application; alternatively
            
         
               —
            
            
               remit the case to the Court of First Instance; and in any event
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Defendants to pay the Appellants' costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments:
   The applicants contend that the order of the Court of First Instance should be set aside on the grounds that the Court of First Instance has committed a breach of procedure by treating their application as an application made under Article 226 EC when, in fact, it was an application under Article 232 EC.