CELEX: 62017TN0080
Language: en
Date: 2017-02-06 00:00:00
Title: Case T-80/17: Action brought on 6 February 2017 — Steiniger v EUIPO — ista Deutschland (IST)

10.4.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 112/43
            
         Action brought on 6 February 2017 — Steiniger v EUIPO — ista Deutschland (IST)
   (Case T-80/17)
   (2017/C 112/59)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Ingo Steiniger (Nümbrecht, Germany) (represented by: K. Schulze Horn, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ista Deutschland GmbH (Essen, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant for registration of the trade mark at issue: The applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘IST’ — Application for registration No 10 673 812
   
      Proceedings before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 December 2016 in Case R 2242/2015-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision and the decision of the Opposition Division of EUIPO of 24 September 2015;
            
         
               —
            
            
               vary the contested decision in such a way that the objection is rejected in its entirety;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8 of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Rule 20(6) of Regulation No 2868/95.