CELEX: 62016TN0300
Language: en
Date: 2016-06-13 00:00:00
Title: Case T-300/16: Action brought on 13 June 2016 — Jindal Saw et Jindal Saw Italia v Commission

29.8.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 314/24
            
         Action brought on 13 June 2016 — Jindal Saw et Jindal Saw Italia v Commission
   (Case T-300/16)
   (2016/C 314/34)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Jindal Saw Ltd (New Delhi, India) and Jindal Saw Italia SpA (Trieste, Italy) (represented by: R. Antonini and E. Monard, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicants claim that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/387 of 17 March 2016 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron), originating in India, in so far as it relates to the Applicants; and
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Commission to bear the costs of the proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
   
               1.
            
            
               First plea in law, alleging that by means of the determination of the export prices, the Commission infringed Articles 2(8), 2(9), 3(2), 3(3), 3(6) and 9(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 of 30 November 2009 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second plea in law, alleging that by means of its price effects, injury and causation determinations, the Commission infringed Articles 3(2), 3(3), 3(5), 3(6), 3(7), 3(8), 4(1), 5(4) and 9(4) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Third plea in law, alleging that the failure to disclose essential facts and considerations and to grant sufficient time to submit comments infringed Articles 20(4) and 20(5) of Council Regulation No 1225/2009.