CELEX: C2003/055/09
Language: en
Date: 2003-03-08 00:00:00
Title: Case C-412/02: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Hof van Cassatie by judgment of that Court of 5 November 2002 in the case of 1. Belgian Refining Corporation, 2. Michael Gene Sachs, 3. Alfred Alfons Marie Leysens, 4. André Leonard Elisabeth Schatteman, 5. Frank Catharina Martin Devoght, and 6. Gilbert Theo Marie Frans Dias against Ministerie van Financiën

8.3.2003                 EN                         Official Journal of the European Union                                          C 55/5
that, by failing to take all necessary measures to ensure that              What is the precise scope of the eleven-month time limit laid
the quality of its bathing water conforms to the limit values               down in Article 11a(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC)
laid down by Council Directive 76/160/EEC of 8 December                     No 1062/87 ( 1) of 27 March 1987 on provisions for the
1975 concerning the quality of bathing water (OJ 1976 L 31,                 implementation of the Community transit procedure and for
p. 1) and by failing to adhere to the minimum sampling                      certain simplifications of that procedure, inserted by
frequencies required by that directive, the Kingdom of Den-                 Article 1(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1429/90 (2)
mark has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 4(1)               of 29 May 1990 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1062/87 on
and 6(1) of the same directive, the Court (Sixth Chamber),                  provisions for the implementation of the Community transit
composed of: J.-P. Puissochet, President of the Chamber,                    procedure and for certain simplifications of that procedure (as
R. Schintgen, C. Gulmann, V. Skouris and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues               applicable prior to the repeal of Regulation No 1062/87 by
(Rapporteur), Judges; J. Mischo, Advocate General; H. von                   Article 127(1) of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1214/
Holstein, Deputy Registrar, has given a judgment on 30 January              92 (3) of 21 April 1992 on provisions for the implementation
2003, in which it:                                                          of the Community transit procedure and for certain simplifi-
                                                                            cations of that procedure, repealed in turn by Article 913 of
                                                                            Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 ( 4) of 2 July 1993
1.    Declares that, by failing, during the years 1995 to 1998, to          laying down provisions for the implementation of Council
      take all necessary measures to ensure that the quality of its         Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 ( 5) establishing the Community
      bathing water conformed to the limit values laid down in              Customs Code)?
      Council Directive 76/160/EEC of 8 December 1975 concern-
      ing the quality of bathing water and by failing, during the same
      years, to adhere to the minimum sampling frequencies required
                                                                            Must this provision be construed as meaning that the com-
      by that directive, the Kingdom of Denmark has failed to fulfil
      its obligations under Articles 4(1) and 6(1) of the same              petent Member State is not entitled to demand the duties owed
                                                                            from the principal where this eleven-month time limit has not
      directive;
                                                                            been observed?
2.    Orders the Kingdom of Denmark to pay the costs.
                                                                            (1 ) OJ L 107 [1987], p. 1.
                                                                            (2 ) OJ L 137 [1990], p. 21.
( 1) OJ C 212 of 28.7.2001.                                                 (3 ) OJ L 132 [1992], p. 1.
                                                                            (4 ) OJ L 253 [1993], p. 1.
                                                                            (5 ) OJ L 302 [1992], p. 1.
Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Hof van Cassatie
by judgment of that Court of 5 November 2002 in the
case of 1. Belgian Refining Corporation, 2. Michael Gene                    Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Hof van Cassatie
Sachs, 3. Alfred Alfons Marie Leysens, 4. André Leonard                     by judgment of that Court of 5 November 2002 in the
Elisabeth Schatteman, 5. Frank Catharina Martin Devoght,                    case of I. Francis Maria SIPS against Ministerie van
and 6. Gilbert Theo Marie Frans Dias against Ministerie                     Financiën and II. Florentius Martha Adrianus Petrus
                             van Financiën                                  Vreijsen and Vreijsen Douane-Expediteur against Minis-
                                                                                                   terie van Financiën
                           (Case C-412/02)
                                                                                                      (Case C-413/02)
                            (2003/C 55/09)
                                                                                                       (2003/C 55/10)
Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
European Communities by judgment of the Hof van Cassatie                    Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
(Belgian Court of Cassation) of 5 November 2002, received at                European Communities by judgment of the Hof van Cassatie
the Court Registry on 19 November 2002, for a preliminary                   (Belgian Court of Cassation) of 5 November 2002, received at
ruling in the case of 1. Belgian Refining Corporation, 2. Michael           the Court Registry on 19 November 2002, for a preliminary
Gene Sachs, 3. Alfred Alfons Marie Leysens, 4. André Leonard                ruling in the case of I. Francis Maria SIPS against Ministerie
Elisabeth Schatteman, 5. Frank Catharina Martin Devoght, and                van Financiën and II. Florentius Martha Adrianus Petrus
6. Gilbert Theo Marie Frans Dias against Ministerie van                     Vreijsen and Vreijsen Douane-Expediteur against Ministerie
Financiën on the following questions:                                       van Financiën on the following questions: