CELEX: 52006PC0464
Language: en
Date: 2006-08-23
Title: Proposal for a Council Decision regarding the position to be taken by the Community within the International Coffee Council on the extension of the International Coffee Agreement, 2001

Important legal notice

|

52006PC0464

Proposal for a Council Decision regarding the position to be taken by the Community within the International Coffee Council on the extension of the International Coffee Agreement, 2001  /* COM/2006/0464 final - ACC 2006/0157 */  

		ENBrussels, 23.8.2006COM(2006) 464 final2006/0157 (ACC)Proposal for aCOUNCIL DECISIONregarding the position to be taken by the Community withinthe International Coffee Council on the extension of the InternationalCoffee Agreement, 2001(presented by the Commission)EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUMThe International Coffee Agreement of 2001 was concluded for the European Community by Council Decision 2001/877/EC of 24 September 2001. The Agreement entered into force provisionally on 1 October 2001 and definitively on 17 May 2005. It is due to expire on 24 September 2007 unless it is extended.At the meeting of the International Coffee Council scheduled in London in September 2006 members may be requested, under the provisions of Article 52(2) of the Agreement, to adopt a resolution providing for the extension of the current Agreement of 2001 for one or more periods not exceeding six years in total, in order to allow sufficient time for the negotiation of amendments or a successor Agreement.The contracting parties must notify the UN headquarters in New York that they accept an extension before the current Agreement expires. In the case of the European Community, participation in the Agreement is in accordance with its exclusive competence. However, Decision 2001/877/EC also authorises the Member States to conclude the Coffee Agreement of 2001 at the same time as the Community, so as to avoid any temporary operational difficulties. Therefore, it might also be necessary for certain Member States to initiate their domestic constitutional procedures in order to accept an extension of the Coffee Agreement of 2001.Under the legal basis, the proposed decision does not change the European Community’s contribution to the Administrative budget of the International Coffee Organisation, which remains due for every coffee year.The purpose of this proposal is to authorise the European Community to vote in favour of extending the Agreement.The Commission therefore suggests that the Council adopts the attached decision.2006/0157 (ACC)Proposal for aCOUNCIL DECISIONregarding the position to be taken by the Community withinthe International Coffee Council on the extension of the InternationalCoffee Agreement, 2001THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 133 in conjunction with Article 300(2) thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the Commission [1],Whereas:(1) The International Agreement on Coffee of 2001 has been signed and concluded on behalf of the European Community on 24 September 2001 by Council Decision 2001/877/EC [2].(2) Under the provisions of Article 52(1) and (2), the International Coffee Agreement of 2001 is due to expire on 30 September 2007 unless it is extended beyond that date by decision of the International Coffee Council for one or more periods not exceeding six years in total.(3) The contracting parties of the International Coffee Agreement of 2001 must notify the United Nations headquarters in New York if they accept an extension of the Agreement.(4) The extension of that Agreement is in the interest of the European Community.(5) The European Community’s position in the International Coffee Council should be determined,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Sole ArticleThe European Community’s position within the International Coffee Council shall be to vote in favour of extending the International Agreement on Coffee, 2001, for one or more periods not exceeding six years and to notify this extension to the United Nations Secretary-General.Done at Brussels,For the CouncilThe PresidentLEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTThis document is intended to accompany and complement the Explanatory Memorandum. As such, when completing this Legislative Financial Statement, and without prejudice to its legibility, an attempt should be made to avoid repeating information contained in the Explanatory Memorandum. Before filling in this template, please refer to the specific Guidelines that have been drafted to provide guidance and clarification for the items below.1. NAME OF THE PROPOSAL:Proposal for a Council Decision regarding the position to be taken by the Community within the International Coffee Council on the extension of the International Coffee Agreement of 20012. ABM / ABB FRAMEWORKPolicy Area(s) concerned and associated Activity/Activities:External Relations, Development and relations with ACP countries. Obligations vis à vis of the International Commodities organisations3. BUDGET LINES3.1 Budget lines (operational lines and related technical and administrative assistance lines (ex- B..A lines)) including headings :21 07 04 Commodities agreement3.2 Duration of the action and of the financial impact:Maximum Six years unless the Agreement is renegotiated in the meantime3.3 Budgetary characteristics (add rows if necessary) :Budget line | Type of expenditure | New | EFTA contribution | Contributions from applicant countries | Heading in financial perspective || Comp  | Diff [3]/  | NO | NO | NO | No [ 4 ] || | | | | | |4. SUMMARY OF RESOURCES4.1 Financial Resources4.1.1 Summary of commitment appropriations (CA) and payment appropriations (PA)EUR million (to 3 decimal places)Expenditure type | Section no. | | Year n | n + 1 | n + 2 | n + 3 | n + 4 | n + 5 and later | Total |Operational expenditure [4] | | | | | | | | |Commitment Appropriations (CA) | 8.1 | a | 1,250 | 1,312 | 1,378 | 1,447 | 1,519 | 1,595 | 8,501* |Payment Appropriations (PA) | | b | 1,250 | 1,312 | 1,378 | 1,447 | 1,519 | 1,595 | 8,501 |* The calculation takes into account an annual average of increase equal to 5%.Administrative expenditure within reference amount [5] | | | | |Technical & administrative assistance (NDA) * | 8.2.4 | c | | | | | | | |* No need for technical and administrative assistance   TOTAL REFERENCE AMOUNT | | | | | | | |Commitment Appropriations | | a+c | 1,250 | 1,312 | 1,378 | 1,447 | 1,519 | 1,595 | 8,501 |Payment Appropriations | | b+c | 1,250 | 1,312 | 1,378 | 1,447 | 1,519 | 1,595 | 8,501 |Administrative expenditure not included in reference amount [6]* No need for technical and administrative assistance | | |Human resources and associated expenditure (NDA) | 8.2.5 | d | | | | | | | |Administrative costs, other than human resources and associated costs, not included in reference amount (NDA) | 8.2.6 | e | | | | | | | |Total indicative financial cost of interventionTOTAL CA including cost of Human Resources | | a+c+d+e | 1,250 | 1,312 | 1,378 | 1,447 | 1,519 | 1,595 | 8,501 |TOTAL PA including cost of Human Resources | | b+c+d+e | 1,250 | 1,312 | 1,378 | 1,447 | 1,519 | 1,595 | 8,501 |Co-financing detailsNo co-financing4.1.2. Compatibility with Financial ProgrammingX Proposal is compatible with existing financial programming.Proposal will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the financial perspective.Proposal may require application of the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement [7] (i.e. flexibility instrument or revision of the financial perspective)4.1.3. Financial impact on RevenueX Proposal has no financial implications on revenueProposal has financial impact – the effect on revenue is as follows:4.2. Human Resources FTE (including officials, temporary and external staff) – see detail under point 8.2.1.The needs for human and administrative resources shall be covered within the allocation granted to the managing DG in the framework of the annual allocation procedure.5. CHARACTERISTICS AND OBJECTIVESDetails of the context of the proposal are required in the Explanatory Memorandum. This section of the Legislative Financial Statement should include the following specific complementary information:5.1. Need to be met in the short or long term.Mandatory obligation to be member to the Coffee Agreement by virtue of a Council Decision.5.2. Value-added of Community involvement and coherence of the proposal with other financial instruments and possible synergy.The present membership to the Coffee Organisation derives from the broader approach always followed by the Community in signing and concluding international commodity agreements once negotiated, as a tool for facilitating exchanges and trade relations among importers and exporters. This facilitates development and responds to the mandate of DG DEV to contribute to policy formulation in several Community policies such as trade, environment, agriculture, and sustainable development as well as other policies with an external dimension. In the particular case of the present international agreement, the Council has also recognised the exclusive competence to the Commission on the basis of Art.133. The main objectives of the agreement are: promote international cooperation in coffee matters; provide forum for intergovernmental consultations; search ways to achieve a reasonable balance between supply and demand of coffee at fair prices to consumers and remunerative to producers; facilitate expansion and transparency of the international trade of coffee; encourage members to develop a sustainable coffee economy. The nature of the present agreement is political, administrative and economic. We consider that a clear positive indicator to measure the achievements of these targets is the unanimous satisfaction of the members to continue the international cooperation through the present agreement.The proposal is coherent with other financial instruments ensuring the EC participation to international organisations. No synergies possible at the present stage.5.3. Objectives, expected results and related indicators of the proposal in the context of the ABM frameworkWithin the ABM framework, the present proposal responds to the objective of developing the Commission’s role as an intellectual focal point for development and ensures effective participation in the international policy debate.The main output indicator could be considered the EU positions for major international initiatives, Conventions, fora and platforms agreed with MS. The impact indicator may be considered the reflection of the EU positions in international partnerships and funds as well as international fora.Looking to the proposal, its objective is to allow the Commission, acting on behalf of the Community, to express the will for an extension of the coffee agreement and by that, ensuring the continuation of the agreement to be in force for a period not exceeding six years. The purpose for extending the validity, will give time for undertaking a negotiation for amending the current agreement or renegotiating a new legal instrument before the end of its duration. Therefore there is an interest of the Commission, within its own competencies, to propose the present decision in conformity with the mandate received by the Member States.5.4. Method of Implementation (indicative)Show below the method(s) [8] chosen for the implementation of the action.| ٱ Centralised Management || X Directly by the Commission || | ٱ Indirectly by delegation to: || | | ٱ Executive Agencies || | | ٱ Bodies set up by the Communities as referred to in art. 185 of the Financial Regulation || | | ٱ National public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service mission || ٱ Shared or decentralised management || | ٱ With Member states || | ٱ With Third countries || ٱ Joint management with international organisations (please specify) |Relevant comments:6. MONITORING AND EVALUATION6.1 Monitoring systemThe Commission Services attend regularly the Council sessions as well as the financial Committee of the International Coffee Organisation. These two bodies are mandated to propose and approve the administrative budget and the inherent contributions. The administrative budget, its utilisation, the financial status of the expenditures and accounts of the International Coffee Organisation are at the disposal of the members.6.2. Evaluation6.2.1 Ex-ante evaluationEvaluation of the compatibility of the annual proposal with our financial policy6.2.2 Measures taken following an intermediate/ex-post evaluation (lessons learned from similar experiences in the past)This exercise is carried out, if necessary, at the moment of a renegotiation6.2.3 Terms and frequency of future evaluation7. Anti-fraud measuresThe Commission will ensure the constant monitoring of the administrative management of the financial resources of the International Coffee Organisation.If so required, the International Coffee Organisation is willing to grant the access to its records and books to OLAF as well as to all other financial and audit services if so required by the Commission.8. DETAILS OF RESOURCES8.1. Objectives of the proposal in terms of their financial costCommitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places)(Headings of Objectives, actions and outputs should be provided) | Type of output | Av. cost | Year n | Year n+1 | Year n+2 | Year n+3 | Year n+4 | Year n+5 and later | TOTAL || | | No. outputs | Total cost | No. outputs | Total cost | No. outputs | Total cost | No. outputs | Total cost | No. outputs | Total cost | No. outputs | Total cost | No. outputs | Total cost |OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE No.1 [9]……… | Contributions to the International Commodities Organisations | | 1 | 1,250 | 1 | 1,312 | 1 | 1,378 | 1 | 1,447 | 1 | 1,519 | 1 | 1,595 | 6 | 8,501 ||||||||||||TOTAL COST | 1 | | 1 | 1,250 | 1 | 1,312 | 1 | 1,378 | 1 | 1,447 | 1 | 1,519 | 1 | 1,595 | 6 | 8,501 |8.2 Administrative Expenditure8.2.1 Number and type of human resourcesThe needs for human and administrative resources shall be covered within the allocation granted to the managing DG in the framework of the annual allocation procedure. The staff and the administrative expenditure are included in the normal allocation of the DG.Types of post | | Staff to be assigned to management of the action using existing and/or additional resources (number of posts/FTEs) || | Year n | Year n+1 | Year n+2 | Year n+3 | Year n+4 | Year n+5 |Officials or temporary staff [10] (XX 01 01) | A*/AD | | | | | | || B*, C*/AST | | | | | | |Staff financed [11] by art. XX 01 02 | | | | | | |Other staff [12] financed by art. XX 01 04/05 | | | | | | |TOTAL | | | | | | |8.2.2 Description of tasks deriving from the actionAttendance to meetings, study of documents, discussion with Member States in Council and finally negotiations within the International Coffee Organisation.8.2.3 Sources of human resources (statutory)(When more than one source is stated, please indicate the number of posts originating from each of the sources)Posts currently allocated to the management of the programme to be replaced or extendedPosts pre-allocated within the APS/PDB exercise for year nPosts to be requested in the next APS/PDB procedurePosts to be redeployed using existing resources within the managing service (internal redeployment)Posts required for year n although not foreseen in the APS/PDB exercise of the year in question8.2.4 Other Administrative expenditure included in reference amount (XX 01 04/05 – Expenditure on administrative management)No need8.2.5 Financial cost of human resources and associated costs not included in the reference amount.The needs for human and administrative resources shall be covered within the allocation granted to the managing DG in the framework of the annual allocation procedure. The staff and the administrative expenditure are included in the normal allocation of the DG.[1] OJ C …[2] OJ L 326, 11.12.2001, p.22[3] Differentiated appropriations[4] Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of the Title xx concerned.[5] Expenditure within article xx 01 04 of Title xx.[6] Expenditure within chapter xx 01 other than articles xx 01 04 or xx 01 05.[7] See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional agreement.[8] If more than one method is indicated please provide additional details in the "Relevant comments" section of this point[9] As described under Section 5.3[10] Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount[11] Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount[12] Cost of which is included within the reference amount--------------------------------------------------