CELEX: 62019TB0499
Language: en
Date: 2020-03-31 00:00:00
Title: Case T-499/19: Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — ZU v EEAS (Action for annulment — Civil service — Officials — Sick leave — Negative opinion by the medical service — Amendments made in the Human Resource Management information system — Acts not amenable to review — Acts not adversely affecting an official — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Premature challenge — Inadmissibility)

8.6.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 191/16
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 31 March 2020 — ZU v EEAS
      (Case T-499/19) (1)
      
      (Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Sick leave - Negative opinion by the medical service - Amendments made in the Human Resource Management information system - Acts not amenable to review - Acts not adversely affecting an official - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Premature challenge - Inadmissibility)
      (2020/C 191/21)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: R. Spac and S. Marquardt, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the alleged decisions of the EEAS of 31 August 2018 and 10 January 2019, of the European Commission note of 30 August 2018 providing for a reduction of the applicant’s sick leave and, so far as necessary, of the Commission’s decision of 1 April 2019 rejecting his complaint of 30 November 2018 against that note and against any subsequent decision to deduct his absence from 28 to 31 August 2018 from his annual leave.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  ZU shall pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 348, 14.10.2019.