CELEX: 62017TA0046
Language: en
Date: 2018-12-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-46/17: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — TDH Group v EUIPO — Comercial de Servicios Agrigán (Pet Cuisine) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark Pet Cuisine — Earlier EU figurative mark The Pet CUISINE alimento para mascotas felices Genial — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

11.3.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 93/48
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — TDH Group v EUIPO — Comercial de Servicios Agrigán (Pet Cuisine)
      (Case T-46/17) (1)
      
      ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Pet Cuisine - Earlier EU figurative mark The Pet CUISINE alimento para mascotas felices Genial - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))
      (2019/C 93/59)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: TDH Group (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: D. Chen, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Comercial de Servicios Agrigán, SA (Huesca, Spain)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 November 2016 (Case R 685/2016 2), relating to opposition proceedings between Comercial de Servicios Agrigán and TDH Group.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders TDH Group to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.