CELEX: 62014TN0702
Language: en
Date: 2014-09-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-702/14: Action brought on 21 September 2014 — Hamas v Council

10.11.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 395/61
            
         
      Action brought on 21 September 2014 — Hamas v Council
      (Case T-702/14)
      (2014/C 395/74)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Hamas (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: L. Glock, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: Council of the European Union
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul Council Decision 2014/483/CFSP of 22 July 2014 updating and amending the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3 and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, and repealing Decision 2014/72/CFSP, in so far as it concerns Hamas (including Hamas-Izz-al-Din-al-Quassem);
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 790/2014 of 22 July 2014 implementing Article 2(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view to combatting terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulation (EU) No 125/2014, in so far as it concerns Hamas (including Hamas-Izz-al-Din-al-Quassem);
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the Council to pay all the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on eight pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-531/11, Hamas v Council. (1)
      
      
         (1)  OJ 2012, C 126, p. 18.