CELEX: 62017CB0125
Language: en
Date: 2018-02-22 00:00:00
Title: Case C-125/17: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma — Italy) — Luigi Bisignani v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale 1 di Roma (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Free movement of capital — Articles 64 and 65 TFEU — Directive 2011/16/EU — Cooperation in the field of taxation — Transfer of capital to the Vatican City State — Obligation to declare a transfer of funds sent or received from abroad — Repeal)

14.5.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 166/17
            
         Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma — Italy) — Luigi Bisignani v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale 1 di Roma
   (Case C-125/17) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 53(2) and Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Free movement of capital - Articles 64 and 65 TFEU - Directive 2011/16/EU - Cooperation in the field of taxation - Transfer of capital to the Vatican City State - Obligation to declare a transfer of funds sent or received from abroad - Repeal))
   (2018/C 166/22)
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Referring court
   
   Commissione tributaria provinciale di Roma
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Luigi Bisignani
   
      Defendant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale 1 di Roma
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   Article 64(1) and Article 65(1)(a) TFEU must be interpreted to the effect that they do not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which definitively repeals the offence of not declaring transfers of funds abroad.
   
      (1)  OJ C 213, 3.7.2017.