CELEX: 62020TA0197
Language: en
Date: 2021-07-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-197/20: Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — JT v EUIPO — Carrasco Pirard (QUILAPAYÚN) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark QUILAPAYÚN — Relative ground for refusal — No well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention — Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

13.9.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 368/21
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — JT v EUIPO — Carrasco Pirard (QUILAPAYÚN)
      (Case T-197/20) (1)
      
      (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark QUILAPAYÚN - Relative ground for refusal - No well-known mark within the meaning of Article 6bis of the Paris Convention - Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(2)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
      (2021/C 368/34)
      Language of the case: Spanish
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: JT (represented by: A. Mena Valenzuela, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Raponi and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
      
         Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Eduardo Carrasco Pirard (Santiago, Chile) and the seven other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 February 2020 (Case R 1518/2019-4), relating to opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, JT and, on the other hand, Mr Carrasco Pirard and the other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO whose names are listed in the annex.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders JT to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2020.