CELEX: C2005/143/63
Language: en
Date: 2005-06-11 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 December 2004 in Case T-55/02 Peter Finch v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Complaint — Implied rejection — Express rejection within the time-limit for appeals — Late notification of rejection — Admissibility — Pensions — Transfer of national pension rights — Calculation of years of service to be taken into account in the Community scheme — Salary taken as basis — Action manifestly unfounded in law)

11.6.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 143/33
            
         
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 6 December 2004
   in Case T-55/02 Peter Finch v Commission of the European Communities (1)
   
   (Officials - Complaint - Implied rejection - Express rejection within the time-limit for appeals - Late notification of rejection - Admissibility - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Calculation of years of service to be taken into account in the Community scheme - Salary taken as basis - Action manifestly unfounded in law)
   (2005/C 143/63)
   Language of the case: French
   In Case T-55/02: Peter Finch, an official of the Commission of the European Communities,residing in Luxembourg (Luxembourg), represented by J.-N. Louis, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and H. Tserepa-Lacombe, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the Commission's decision concerning the crediting of years of pensionable service to be taken into account in the Community scheme in consequence of the transfer of all the pension rights acquired by the applicant prior to his entry into service with the Commission — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, M.E. Martins Ribeiro and K. Jürimäe, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 6 December 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The parties shall bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 97 of 20.4.2002.