CELEX: 62011TA0074
Language: en
Date: 2013-05-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-74/11: Judgment of the General Court of 30 May 2013 — Omnis Group v Commission (Competition — Abuse of dominant position — Market for the provision of Enterprise Resource Planning software (ERP) and Enterprise Application Software (EAS) — Decision rejecting a complaint — No European Union interest)

3.8.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 225/66
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 30 May 2013 — Omnis Group v Commission
   (Case T-74/11) (1)
   
   (Competition - Abuse of dominant position - Market for the provision of Enterprise Resource Planning software (ERP) and Enterprise Application Software (EAS) - Decision rejecting a complaint - No European Union interest)
   2013/C 225/147
   Language of the case: Romanian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Omnis Group Srl (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: D.-A.-F. Tarara, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, A. Biolan and J. Bourke, subsequently by A. Biolan and C. Hödlmayr, acting as Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the defendant: Microsoft Corp. (Redmond, Washington, United States) (represented by: A.-M. Baciu and G. Harapcea, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 8529 of 1 December 2010 rejecting the complaint (Case COMP/39.784 — Omnis/Microsoft) concerning alleged infringements of Articles 101 TFEU, 102 TFEU and 106 TFEU by Microsoft Corp. on the market for Enterprise Application Software, referred to as ‘Enterprise Application Software/Enterprise Resource Planning’ systems.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Omnis Group Srl to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011.