CELEX: 62007TA0460
Language: en
Date: 2010-01-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-460/07: Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2010 — Nokia v OHIM — Medion (LIFE BLOG) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark LIFE BLOG — Earlier national word mark LIFE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now, Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) — Partial refusal to register)

27.2.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 51/31
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 20 January 2010 — Nokia v OHIM — Medion (LIFE BLOG)
   (Case T-460/07) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark LIFE BLOG - Earlier national word mark LIFE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now, Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009) - Partial refusal to register)
   2010/C 51/59
   Language of the case: Finnish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Nokia Oyj (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: J. Tanhuanpää, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Medion AG (Essen, Germany) (represented by: P.-M. Weisse, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 2 October 2007 (Case R 141/2007-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Medion AG and Nokia Oyj
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Nokia Oyj to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 51, 23.2.2008.