CELEX: 62018TN0265
Language: en
Date: 2018-04-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-265/18: Action brought on 27 April 2018 — Biernacka-Hoba v EUIPO — Formata Bogusław Hoba (Formata)

201806150791955182018/C 231/462652018TC23120180702EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180427363721Case T-265/18: Action brought on 27 April 2018 — Biernacka-Hoba v EUIPO — Formata Bogusław Hoba (Formata)
 ---documentbreak--- C2312018EN3610120180427EN0046361372Action brought on 27 April 2018 — Biernacka-Hoba v EUIPO — Formata Bogusław Hoba (Formata)
   (Case T-265/18)2018/C 231/46Language in which the application was lodged: Polish
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Ilona Biernacka-Hoba (Aleksandrów Łódzki, Poland) (represented by: R. Rumpel, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Formata Bogusław Hoba (Aleksandrów Łódzki, Poland)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word element ‘Formata’ — European Union trade mark No 11 529 427
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 February 2018 in Case R 2032/2017-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
            —
         
         
            declare the action well founded;
         
      
            —
         
         
            annul the contested decision in so far as it dismisses the application for a declaration that the trade mark ‘Formata’ No 11 529 427 is invalid;
         
      
            —
         
         
            amend the contested decision by declaring the trade mark ‘Formata’ No 11 529 427 invalid;
         
      
            —
         
         
            amend the contested decision in so far as it concerns the costs;
         
      
            —
         
         
            order EUIPO to pay the costs.
         
      
      Plea in law
   
   
            —
         
         
            The Board of Appeal incorrectly considered that there was a lack of substantiation of the earlier trade mark.