CELEX: 62014TN0381
Language: en
Date: 2014-05-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-381/14: Action brought on 30 May 2014 — Pshonka v Council

11.8.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 261/38
            
         Action brought on 30 May 2014 — Pshonka v Council
   (Case T-381/14)
   2014/C 261/63
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Viktor Pavlovych Pshonka (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: C. Constantina and J.-M. Reymond, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               partially annul, on the basis of Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 and Council Regulation No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014, insofar as they concern the applicant and, more specifically, order:
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           to remove the applicant’s name from Annex I of the Council Regulation N. 208/2014 of 5 March 2014;
                        
                     
                           —
                        
                        
                           to remove the applicant’s name from Annex I of the Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014;
                        
                     
         
               —
            
            
               partially annul, on the basis of Article 263 TFEU, Council Decision 2014/119/CFSP of 5 March 2014 and Council Regulation No 208/2014 of 5 March 2014, insofar as they do not conform to the Joint Proposal;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Council to bear the costs of this suit and award costs to the applicant.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-380/14, Pshonka v Council.