CELEX: 62018TN0202
Language: en
Date: 2018-03-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-202/18: Action brought on 23 March 2018 — Bruel v Commission

14.5.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 166/45
            
         Action brought on 23 March 2018 — Bruel v Commission
   (Case T-202/18)
   (2018/C 166/57)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Damien Bruel (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Hansen, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               declare the present application admissible and well founded;
            
         and consequently:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of 18 January 2018 entitled ‘Decision of the Secretary General pursuant to Article 4 of the rules implementing Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001’ on the ground of infringement of Articles 4, 6 and 9 of that regulation, and infringement of Article 47 of the Charter, of Article 6 the European Convention on Human Rights, of the general principle of equality of arms, and of the duty to state reasons;
            
         in any event:
   
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay all the costs;
            
         
               —
            
            
               reserve to the applicant all other rights, entitlements, pleas and actions.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of his application, the applicant puts forward four pleas in law:
   
               1.
            
            
               A first plea, alleging that Articles 4 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43) have been infringed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               A second plea, alleging that Article 6 of Regulation No 1049/2001 has been infringed.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               A third plea, alleging that the general principle of equality of arms, Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights have been infringed.
            
         
               4.
            
            
               A fourth plea, alleging that Article 4(6) of Regulation No 1049/2001, the principle of proportionality and the duty to state reasons have been infringed.