CELEX: 62018TB0304
Language: en
Date: 2019-01-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-304/18: Order of the General Court of 23 January 2019 — MLPS v Commission (Action for annulment and for failure to act — Decision to take no further action on a complaint — Refusal by the Commission to institute proceedings under Article 7 TEU — Act not open to challenge — No direct concern — Inadmissibility)

11.3.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 93/61
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 23 January 2019 — MLPS v Commission
      (Case T-304/18) (1)
      
      ((Action for annulment and for failure to act - Decision to take no further action on a complaint - Refusal by the Commission to institute proceedings under Article 7 TEU - Act not open to challenge - No direct concern - Inadmissibility))
      (2019/C 93/80)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Mouvement pour la liberté de la protection sociale (MLPS) (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Gibaud, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Tserepa–Lacombe and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      First, application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Commission of 7 March 2018 refusing to take any further action on a complaint requesting that proceedings be brought on the basis of Article 7 TEU against the French Republic and, secondly, action based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully refrained from dealing with that complaint.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The action is dismissed.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  The Mouvement pour la liberté de la protection sociale shall pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 259, 23.7.2018.