CELEX: 62007TA0386
Language: en
Date: 2009-10-29 00:00:00
Title: Case T-386/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 October 2009 — Peek & Cloppenburg v OHIM — Redfil (Agile) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark Agile — Earlier Community and national word marks Aygill’s — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

19.12.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 312/27
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 29 October 2009 — Peek & Cloppenburg v OHIM — Redfil (Agile)
   (Case T-386/07) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark Agile - Earlier Community and national word marks Aygill’s - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   2009/C 312/44
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Peek & Cloppenburg (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: T. Dolde, A. Renck and V. von Bomhard, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by S. Laitinen, and subsequently by R. Pethke, Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Redfil, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: C. Hernández Hernández, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 July 2007 (Case R 1324/2006-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Peek & Cloppenburg and Redfil, SL.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 26 July 2007 (Case R 1324/2006 2).
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to pay the costs incurred by Peek & Cloppenburg.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders Redfil, SL to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 297, 8.12.2007.