CELEX: 62012TA0488
Language: en
Date: 2014-04-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-488/12: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — CITEB and Belgo-Metal v Parliament (Public works contracts — Tender procedure — Work for the renovation and extension of the Eastman building in Brussels — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Notification of the evaluation committee’s report — Duty to state reasons)

10.6.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 175/38
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — CITEB and Belgo-Metal v Parliament
   (Case T-488/12) (1)
   
   ((Public works contracts - Tender procedure - Work for the renovation and extension of the Eastman building in Brussels - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Notification of the evaluation committee’s report - Duty to state reasons))
   2014/C 175/51
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Cit Blaton SA (CITEB) (Schaerbeek, Belgium); and Belgo-Metal (Wetteren, Belgium) (represented by: R. Simar, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: F. Poilvache and L. Fedel, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 7 September 2012 rejecting the tender made by the applicants in response to a contract notice of 19 May 2012, published in the Supplement to the Official Journal of the European Union (OJ 2012/S 92-1563620) under reference NINLO.AO-2012-005-BRU-UPIB-02, concerning the carrying out of work for the renovation and extension of the Eastman building in Brussels (Belgium) and awarding that contract to another tenderer.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Cit Blaton SA (CITEB) and Belgo-Metal to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 9, 12.1.2013.