CELEX: C2002/202/36
Language: en
Date: 2002-08-24 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 June 2002 of 27 June 2002 in Joined Cases T-373/00, T-27/01, T-56/01 and T-69/01: Carmine Salvatore Tralli v European Central Bank (Officials — Staff of the European Central Bank — Extension of trial period — Dismissal during trial period — Admissibility — Manifest error of assessment — Statement of reasons — Costs)

C 202/24                EN                       Official Journal of the European Communities                                      24.8.2002
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                     JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                                      of 27 June 2002
                          of 11 June 2002
                                                                            of 27 June 2002 in Joined Cases T-373/00, T-27/01, T-56/
                                                                            01 and T-69/01: Carmine Salvatore Tralli v European
in Case T-365/00: Alsace International Car Service SARL                                               Central Bank (1)
                (AICS) v European Parliament (1)
                                                                            (Officials — Staff of the European Central Bank — Exten-
                                                                            sion of trial period — Dismissal during trial period —
(Public contracts for the provision of services — Transport                 Admissibility — Manifest error of assessment — Statement
of persons using vehicles with drivers during sessions of the                                       of reasons — Costs)
  Parliament in Strasbourg — Conformity with French law)
                                                                                                      (2002/C 202/36)
                          (2002/C 202/35)                                                      (Language of the case: German)
                     (Language of the case: French)
                                                                            In Joined Cases T-373/00, T-27/01, T-56/01 et T-69/01:
                                                                            Carmine Salvatore Tralli, former employee of the European
                                                                            Central Bank, residing in Nidderau (Germany), represented by
                                                                            N. Pflüger, R. Steiner and S. Mittländer, lawyers, with an
                                                                            address for service in Luxembourg, against European Central
                                                                            Bank (Agents: A. Sáinz de Vicuña Barroso, M. Benisch,
In Case T-365/00, Alsace International Car Service SARL                     V. Saintot and B. Wägenbaur) — applications for annulment
(AICS), established in Strasbourg (France), represented by                  of the decision of 18 September 2000 extending the trial
J.C. Fourgoux and J.L. Fourgoux, lawyers, with an address                   period in respect of the applicant’s employment contract, the
for service in Luxembourg, v European Parliament (Agents:                   decision of 29 November 2000 dismissing the applicant, the
O. Caisou-Rousseau and D. Peterheim): Application for annul-                decisions rejecting complaints relating to the abovementioned
ment of the European Parliament’s decision of 4 October                     decisions to extend the trial period and to dismiss the applicant
2000 rejecting the applicant’s request of 5 September 2000                  and an application for a finding that the President of the
concerning the validity of the contract entered into between                European Central Bank failed to act when he unlawfully
the Parliament and Coopérative Taxi 13 and, secondly, for                   refrained from replying to the complaint lodged by the
damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant as a               applicant against the decision to extend the trial period — the
result of that decision, the Court of First Instance (Fifth                 Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jae-
Chamber), composed of: J.D. Cooke, President, R. Garcı́a-                   ger, President, K. Lenaerts and J. Azizi, Judges; D. Christensen,
Valdecasas and P. Lindh, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator,             Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 27 June
for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 11 June 2002, in                 2002, in which it:
which it:
                                                                            1.    Joined Cases T-373/00, T-27/01, T-56/01 and T-69/01 for
                                                                                  the purposes of the judgment.
1.    Annuls the Parliament’s decision of 4 October 2000 rejecting
      the applicant’s request of 5 September 2000;                          2.    Dismisses Case T-373/00.
                                                                            3.    Finds that there is no need to adjudicate in Cases T-27/01,
2.    Rejects the claim for compensation;                                         T-56/01 and T-69/01.
                                                                            4.    Orders each party in Case T-373/00 to bear its own costs.
3.    Orders the Parliament to pay the costs including those reserved
      by the order of the Court of First Instance of 8 May 2001.
                                                                            5.    Orders the applicant in Cases T-27/01, T-56/01 and T-69/
                                                                                  01 to bear his own costs and pay a third of those incurred by
                                                                                  the defendant.
(1) OJ C 28 of 27.1.2001.
                                                                            (1) OJ C 61 of 24.2.2001, C 134 of 5.5.2001, C 150 of 19.5.2001
                                                                                and C 173 of 16.6.2001.