CELEX: 62017TB0605
Language: en
Date: 2019-09-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-605/17: Order of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — CX v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Remuneration — Decision of the Commission to recover salaries paid to the applicant — Debit note ordering recovery of the sums at issue — Replacement of the contested measures in the course of the proceedings — Abandonment of any measure seeking the recovery of the sums at issue — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

16.12.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 423/51
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 24 September 2019 — CX v Commission
      (Case T-605/17) (1)
      
      (Civil Service - Officials - Remuneration - Decision of the Commission to recover salaries paid to the applicant - Debit note ordering recovery of the sums at issue - Replacement of the contested measures in the course of the proceedings - Abandonment of any measure seeking the recovery of the sums at issue - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
      (2019/C 423/64)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: CX (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and D. Milanowska, acting as Agents
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the measures seeking recovery of the salaries paid for the months of November 2013 to October 2016.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     Each party shall bear their own costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 374, 6.11.2017.