CELEX: 62015FB0070
Language: en
Date: 2016-08-02 00:00:00
Title: Case F-70/15: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 August 2016 — Polizzi v Commission (Civil service — Contract staff — Pensions — Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under a national pension scheme — Decision recognising the crediting of pensionable years applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

3.10.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 364/55
            
         
      Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 August 2016 — Polizzi v Commission
      (Case F-70/15) (1)
      
      ((Civil service - Contract staff - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under a national pension scheme - Decision recognising the crediting of pensionable years applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))
      (2016/C 364/72)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Rosalba Polizzi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially J. Currall and G. Gattinara, Agents, then G. Gattinara, Agent)
      
         Subject-matter of the case
      
      Action for annulment of the final decision transferring the applicant’s pension rights to the EU pension scheme, which applies the new general implementing provisions (GIP) of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations of 3 March 2011.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1)
               
               
                  The action is dismissed as in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded.
               
            
                  2)
               
               
                  The parties shall bear their own costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 245, 27.7.2015, p 49.