CELEX: 62022CN0051
Language: en
Date: 2022-01-25 00:00:00
Title: Case C-51/22: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pesti Központi Kerületi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 25 January 2022 — PannonHitel Pénzügyi Zrt. v WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.)

19.4.2022   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 165/28
            
         
      Request for a preliminary ruling from the Pesti Központi Kerületi Bíróság (Hungary) lodged on 25 January 2022 — PannonHitel Pénzügyi Zrt. v WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.)
      (Case C-51/22)
      (2022/C 165/36)
      Language of the case: Hungarian
      
         Referring court
      
      Pesti Központi Kerületi Bíróság
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: PannonHitel Pénzügyi Zrt.
      
         Defendant: WizzAir Hungary Légiközlekedési Zrt. (Wizz Air Hungary Zrt.)
      
         Question referred
      
      Must Article 5(1)(a), the first indent of Article 8(1)(a) and Article 8(2) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, (1) be interpreted as meaning that a passenger may exercise his or her right to reimbursement of the full cost of the ticket at the price at which it was bought directly against the air carrier, even where the passenger has booked the ticket with the help of a third party acting as an intermediary, to whom the passenger paid the ticket price, and it was the intermediary who purchased the ticket from the air carrier and who paid [the carrier] the ticket price, and there is no indication that the intermediary was acting as the authorised agent of the air carrier or that it was a tour operator?
      
         (1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.