CELEX: 62009TN0480
Language: en
Date: 2009-11-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-480/09: Action brought on 30 November 2009 — ATB Norte v OHIM — Bricocenter Italia (BRICOCENTER)

30.1.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 24/67
            
         Action brought on 30 November 2009 — ATB Norte v OHIM — Bricocenter Italia (BRICOCENTER)
   (Case T-480/09)
   2010/C 24/119
   Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: ATB Norte, SL (Burgos, Spain) (represented by: P. López Ronda, G. Macías Bonilla, H.L. Curtis-Oliver and G. Marín Raigal, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Bricocenter Italia Srl (Rozzano Milanofiori (Milan), Italy)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 September 2009 — R 1045/2008-4.
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: Bricocenter S.r.l.
   
      Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘BRICOCENTER’ (Application No 4 935 185) in respect of services in Class 35.
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: ATB Norte, SL.
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: Figurative Community trade marks containing the word elements ‘CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE BRICOCENTRO’ (No 3 262 623) and ‘ATB CENTROS DE BRICOLAGE BRICOCENTRO’ (No 989 046) in respect of services in Classes 35, 37 and 39.
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Opposition Division’s decision annulled and the opposition rejected in its entirety.
   
      Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation and application of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.