CELEX: 62012TA0487
Language: en
Date: 2013-12-11 00:00:00
Title: Case T-487/12: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2013 — Eckes-Granini v OHIM — Panini (PANINI) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark PANINI — Earlier national and Community word marks GRANINI — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

1.2.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 31/10
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2013 — Eckes-Granini v OHIM — Panini (PANINI)
   (Case T-487/12) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark PANINI - Earlier national and Community word marks GRANINI - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2014/C 31/17
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Eckes-Granini Group GmbH (Nieder-Olm, Germany) (represented by: W. Berlit, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Panini SpA (Modène, Italy) (represented by F. Terrano, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 September 2012 (Case R 2393/2011-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Eckes-Granini Group GmbH and Panini SpA.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Eckes-Granini Group GmbH to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 26, 26.1.2013