CELEX: 62017TN0525
Language: en
Date: 2017-08-07 00:00:00
Title: Case T-525/17: Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Taberna Ángel Sierra and Others v SRB

23.10.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 357/22
            
         Action brought on 7 August 2017 — Taberna Ángel Sierra and Others v SRB
   (Case T-525/17)
   (2017/C 357/29)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Taberna Ángel Sierra, SL (Madrid, Spain) and 67 other applicants (represented by: P. Rúa Sobrino, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Single Resolution Board
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicants claim that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Declare Articles 18 and 29 of Regulation (EU) No 806/2014 illegal and inapplicable;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the Single Resolution Board to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The present action concerns Decision SRB/EES/2017/08 of the Single Resolution Board of 7 June 2017 allowing the resolution of the Banco Popular Español, S.A.
   The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-478/17, Mutualidad de la Abogacía and Hermandad Nacional de Arquitectos Superiores y Químicos v Single Resolution Board, T-481/17, Fundación Tatiana Pérez de Guzmán el Bueno and SFL v Single Resolution Board, T-482/17, Comercial Vascongada Recalde v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-483/17, García Suárez and Others v Commission and Single Resolution Board, T-484/17, Fidesban and Others v Single Resolution Board, T-497/17, Sáchez del Valle and Calatrava Real State 2015 v Commission and Single Resolution Board, and T-498/17, Pablo Álvarez de Linera Granda v Commission and Single Resolution Board.