CELEX: C2006/310/31
Language: en
Date: 2006-12-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-13/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2006 — Castell del Remei v OHIM — Bodegas Roda (ODA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Earlier international word mark RODA and earlier national word marks BODEGAS RODA, RODA I and RODA II — Application for a Community word mark ODA — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

16.12.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 310/16
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 October 2006 — Castell del Remei v OHIM — Bodegas Roda (ODA)
   (Case T-13/05) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Earlier international word mark RODA and earlier national word marks BODEGAS RODA, RODA I and RODA II - Application for a Community word mark ODA - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2006/C 310/31)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Castell del Remei, SL (Castell del Remei, Spain) (represented by: J. Grau Mora, A. Angulo, M. Baylos Morales, A. Velázquez Ibánez, F. de Visscher, E. Cornu, É. De Gryse, D. Moreau and P. Merino Baylos, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance: Bodegas Roda, SA (La Rioja, Spain) (represented by: M. López Camba, lawyer)
   Re:
   Application for annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 October 2004 (Case R 691/2003-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Bodegas Roda SA and Castell del Remei, SL.
   Operative part of the judgment
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 69, 19.3.2005.