CELEX: 62019TN0355
Language: en
Date: 2019-06-13 00:00:00
Title: Case T-355/19: Action brought on 13 June 2019 — CE v Committee of the Regions

29.7.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 255/56
            
         
      Action brought on 13 June 2019 — CE v Committee of the Regions
      (Case T-355/19)
      (2019/C 255/69)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: CE (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: Committee of the Regions
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  declare the present application admissible and well founded;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul the decision of 16 April 2019 and, in the alternative, annul the decision of 16 May 2019;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the payment of compensation in respect of the material harm incurred, amounting to the sum of EUR 19 200 non-inclusive of VAT, and compensation in respect of the non-material harm incurred, estimated to amount to the sum of EUR 83 208,24;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to pay all the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging an abuse of process and infringement of Articles 47 and 49 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants and of Articles 23 and 24 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to fair and just working conditions, of the principle of sound administration and of the prohibition on any form of psychological harassment.
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Third plea in law, alleging material inaccuracy and a manifest error of assessment.