CELEX: C2004/239/50
Language: en
Date: 2004-09-25 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 27 May 2004 in Case T-379/02: Antonio Di Adolfo v Commission of the European Communities (Action for annulment — Time-limits — Claim for compensation — Originating application — Formal requirements — Injunction against an institution — Manifestly inadmissible)

25.9.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 239/23
            
         
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (Fourth Chamber)
   of 27 May 2004
   in Case T-379/02: Antonio Di Adolfo v Commission of the European Communities (1)
   
   (Action for annulment - Time-limits - Claim for compensation - Originating application - Formal requirements - Injunction against an institution - Manifestly inadmissible)
   (2004/C 239/50)
   Language of the case: Italian
   In Case T-379/02: Antonio Di Adolfo, residing at Rome (Italy), represented by S. Amato, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agent: E. Montaguti assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer) with an address for service in Luxembourg — application for, on one hand, annulment of the Commission Decision of 30 October 2001 withdrawing financial assistance originally granted to the applicant in the context of the Joint Venture Programme for the incorporation of an Italo-Romanian joint venture company (JOP Facility 2 — Project in Romania with Phoenix European S.r.l. - J2BROSEVEN) and, on the other hand, damages in respect of the loss allegedly caused to the applicant — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 27 May 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:
   
               1.
            
            
               The claim is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 44, 22.2.2003.