CELEX: 62015CA0269
Language: en
Date: 2016-10-26 00:00:00
Title: Case C-269/15: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie — Belgium) — Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen v Willem Hoogstad (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 4 — Material scope — Deductions from statutory old-age pensions and all other supplementary benefits — Article 13 — Determination of the applicable legislation — Residence in another Member State)

9.1.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 6/17
            
         Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hof van Cassatie — Belgium) — Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen v Willem Hoogstad
   (Case C-269/15) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 4 - Material scope - Deductions from statutory old-age pensions and all other supplementary benefits - Article 13 - Determination of the applicable legislation - Residence in another Member State))
   (2017/C 006/21)
   Language of the case: Dutch
   
      Referring court
   
   Hof van Cassatie
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Rijksdienst voor Pensioenen
   
      Defendant: Willem Hoogstad
   
      Intervener: Rijksinstituut voor ziekte- en invaliditeitsverzekering
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Article 13(1) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1606/98 of 29 June 1998, precludes a national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which imposes levies of contributions that have a direct and sufficiently relevant link with the legislation governing the branches of social security listed in Article 4 of that regulation on payments made under supplementary pension schemes even though the beneficiary of that supplementary pension scheme does not reside in that Member State and is subject, in accordance with Article 13(2)(f) of that regulation, to the social security legislation of the Member State in which he resides.
   
      (1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.