CELEX: C1996/031/11
Language: en
Date: 1996-02-03 00:00:00
Title: JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) of 30 November 1995 in Case C-175/94 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal): The Queen v. Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte John Gallagher (Freedom of movement for persons - Derogations - Decisions concerning the control of foreign nationals - Decision ordering expulsion - Prior opinion of the competent authority)

No C 31 /6          MEN                    Official Journal of the European Communities                                     3 . 2 . 96
     governing an archipelago forming part ofthe territory of               decision ordering expulsion before a competent
     that State require all petroleum product wholesalers                   authority has given its opinion.
     wishing to extend their activities to that part of the
     national territory to supply a certain number of islands
     in the archipelago, having regard to the problems of             2 . Article 9 (1 ) of Directive 64/221 /EEC does not preclude
     supplying insular regions.                                             the competent authority referred to in that provision
                                                                            from being appointed by the same administrative
                                                                            authority as takes the decision ordering expulsion,
2 . Such rules are compatible with Article 85, read in                      provided that the competent authority can perform its
     conjunction with the second paragraph ofArticle 5, and                 duties in absolute independence and is not subject to any
     with Article 30 of the EC Treaty.                                      control by the authority empowered to take the
                                                                            measures provided for in the Directive. It is for the
                                                                            national court to determine in each case whether those
3 . Article 102 (1 ) of the EC Treaty does not give rise to
     individual rights which the courts must protect.                       requirements have been met.
                                                                      ( 1 ) OJ No C 233 , 20 . 8 . 1994 .
(') OJ No C 202 , 23 . 7. 1994 .
              JUDGMENT OF THE COURT                                                   JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                       ( Sixth Chamber )                                                        ( Fifth Chamber)
                    of 30 November 1995                                                    of 30 November 1995
in Case C-l 75/94 ( reference for a preliminary ruling from                   in Case C-l 18/95 : Commission of the European
the Court of Appeal ): The Queen v. Secretary of State for the                       Communities v. Italian Republic ( J )
       Home Department, ex parte John Gallagher ( ] )                 (Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations —
(Freedom of movement for persons — Derogations —                      Directives 92/33/EEC and 92/34/EEC — Failure to
Decisions concerning the control of foreign nationals —                                               transpose)
Decision ordering expulsion — Prior opinion of the                                                 ( 96/C 31 / 12 )
                     competent authority)
                          ( 96/C 31 / 11 )
                                                                                       (Language of the case: Italian)
               (Language of the case: English)
                                                                      (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
                                                                                 published in the European Court Reports)
In Case C-175/94 : reference to the Court under Article 177
of the EC Treaty by the Court of Appeal, London, for a
preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that             In Case C-l 18/95 : Commission of the European
court between The Queen and Secretary of State for the                Communities ( Agent: Eugenio de March ) v. Italian Republic
Home Department, ex parte John Gallagher — on the                     ( Agents : Umberto Leanza and Maurizio Fiorilli ) —
interpretation of Council Directive 64/22 1 /EEC of                   application for a declaration that, by failing to adopt within
25 February 1964 on the coordination of special measures              the prescribed period the laws, regulations and
concerning the movement and residence of foreign nationals            administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council
which are justified on grounds of public policy, public               Directive 92/33/EEC of 28 April 1992 on the marketing of
security or public health ( OJ, English Special Edition               vegetable propagating and planting material, other than
 1963-1964, p. 117 ) — the Court ( Sixth Chamber ),                   seed ( OJ 1992 , No L 157, p. 1 ) and Council Directive
composed of C. N. Kakouris, President of the Chamber,                  92/34/EEC of 28 April 1992 on the marketing of fruit plant
G. Hirsch, G. F. Mancini, F. A. Schockweiler and P. J. G.             propagating material and fruit plants intended for fruit
Kapteyn ( Rapporteur ), Judges; M. B. Elmer, Advocate                 production ( OJ 1992 , No L 157, p. 10 ), the Italian Republic
General; L. Hewlett, Administrator, for the Registrar, has            has failed to fulfil its obligations under the EC Treaty — the
given a judgment on 30 November 1995 , the operative part              Court ( Fifth Chamber ), composed of D. A. O. Edward,
of which is as follows :                                              President of the Chamber, J. -P. Puissochet, C. Gulmann,
                                                                      P. Jann and L. Sevon ( Rapporteur), Judges; G. Cosmas,
                                                                       Advocate General ; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on
 1 . Article 9 (I ) of Council Directive 64/221 /EEC of                30 November 1995 the operative part of which is as
     25 February 1964 on the coordination of special                   follows :
     measures concerning the movement and residence of
     foreign nationals which are justified on grounds of
     public policy, public security or public health must be           1 . By failing to adopt the laws, regulations and
     interpreted as meaning that, save in cases of urgency, it               administrative provisions necessary to comply with
     prohibits the administrative authority from taking a                    Council Directive 92/33/EEC of 28 April 1992 on the