CELEX: 62014CA0182
Language: en
Date: 2015-03-19 00:00:00
Title: Case C-182/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(1)(b) — Application for registration of the Community word mark MAGNEXT — Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national word mark MAGNET 4 — Likelihood of confusion)

11.5.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 155/6
            
         Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 — MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   (Case C-182/14 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Application for registration of the Community word mark MAGNEXT - Opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national word mark MAGNET 4 - Likelihood of confusion))
   (2015/C 155/07)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: MEGA Brands International, Luxembourg, Zweigniederlassung Zug (represented by: A. Nordemann and M. Maier, Rechtsanwälte)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: V. Melgar, acting as Agent)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1)
            
            
               Sets aside paragraph 4 of the operative part of the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Mega Brands v OHIM — Diset (MAGNEXT) (T-604/11 and T-292/12, EU:T:2014:56);
            
         
               2)
            
            
               Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
            
         
               3)
            
            
               Reserves the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.