CELEX: 62007TA0089
Language: en
Date: 2009-05-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-89/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 May 2009 — VIP Car Solutions v Parliament (Public service contracts — Tendering procedure concerning a chauffeur driven car and minibus service for Members of the European Parliament during sessions in Strasbourg — Rejection of a tender — Obligation to state reasons — Refusal to disclose the price proposed by the successful tenderer — Action for damages)

4.7.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 153/36
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 May 2009 — VIP Car Solutions v Parliament
   (Case T-89/07) (1)
   
   (Public service contracts - Tendering procedure concerning a chauffeur driven car and minibus service for Members of the European Parliament during sessions in Strasbourg - Rejection of a tender - Obligation to state reasons - Refusal to disclose the price proposed by the successful tenderer - Action for damages)
   2009/C 153/68
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: VIP Car Solutions SARL (Hoenheim, France) (represented by: G. Welzer and S. Leuvrey, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Petersheim and M. Ecker, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   First, annulment of the decision of the Parliament to refuse to award to the applicant the public contract which was the subject of tendering procedure PE/2006/06/UTD/1 concerning a chauffeur-driven car and minibus service for Members of the European Parliament during sessions in Strasbourg and, second, a claim for damages.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision by which the European Parliament refused to award to VIP Car Solutions SARL the public contract which was the subject of tendering procedure PE/2006/06/UTD/1;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the Parliament to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 117, 29.5.2007.