CELEX: 62016TA0639
Language: en
Date: 2018-01-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-639/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 January 2018 — FV v Council (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Appraisal — Career evaluation report — Appraisal year 2013 — Dismissal of action at first instance — Composition of the adjudicating Chamber which delivered the judgment at first instance — Procedure for the appointment of a judge to the Civil Service Tribunal — Tribunal established by law — Principle of the lawful judge)

5.3.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 83/20
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 23 January 2018 — FV v Council
   (Case T-639/16) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Appraisal - Career evaluation report - Appraisal year 2013 - Dismissal of action at first instance - Composition of the adjudicating Chamber which delivered the judgment at first instance - Procedure for the appointment of a judge to the Civil Service Tribunal - Tribunal established by law - Principle of the lawful judge))
   (2018/C 083/30)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: FV (represented by: L. Levi, avocat)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: J.-B. Laignelot and M. Bauer, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2016, FV v Council (F-40/15, EU:F:2016:137), seeking to have that judgment set aside.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2016, FV v Council, (F-40/15);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Refers the action to a Chamber of the Tribunal other than that which has ruled in the present appeal;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Reserves the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 419, 14.11.2016.