CELEX: 52012PC0493
Language: en
Date: 2012-09-13
Title: Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2012/002 DE/manroland from Germany)

|
			
		
		
		52012PC0493
		
			Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management (application EGF/2012/002 DE/manroland from Germany) /* COM/2012/0493 final - 2012/ () */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
Point 28 of the Interinstitutional
Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the
Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management[1] allows for the mobilisation of
the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund (EGF) through a flexibility
mechanism, within the annual ceiling of EUR 500 million over and
above the relevant headings of the financial framework.
The rules applicable to the contributions
from the EGF are laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on establishing the European
Globalisation Adjustment Fund[2].
On 4 May 2012, Germany submitted application EGF/2012/002 DE/manroland
for a financial contribution from the EGF, following
redundancies in manroland AG and two of its subsidiaries (hereinafter referred
to as "manroland"), as well as one supplier in Germany.
After a thorough
examination of this application, the Commission has concluded in accordance
with Article 10 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006 that the conditions for a
financial contribution under this Regulation are met.
SUMMARY OF THE APPLICATION AND ANALYSIS
 Key data: ||   
 EGF Reference no. || EGF/2012/002 
 Member State || Germany 
 Article 2 || (a) 
 Primary enterprise || manroland AG 
 Subsidiaries and suppliers || 3 
 Reference period || 1.1.2012 – 30.4.2012 
 Starting date for the personalised services || 1.8.2012 
 Application date || 4.5.2012 
 Redundancies during the reference period || 2 239 
 Redundancies before and after the reference period || 45 
 Total eligible redundancies || 2 284 
 Redundant workers expected to participate in the measures || 2 103 
 Expenditure for personalised services (EUR) || 10 305 889 
 Expenditure for implementing EGF[3] (EUR) || 400 000 
 Expenditure for implementing EGF (%) || 3,74 
 Total budget (EUR) || 10 705 889 
 EGF contribution (50 %) (EUR) || 5 352 944 
1.           The application was
presented to the Commission on 4 May 2012 and supplemented by additional
information up to 10 July 2012.
2.           The
application meets the conditions for deploying the EGF as set out in Article
2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, and was submitted within the deadline of
10 weeks referred to in Article 5 of that Regulation.
Link between the redundancies and major structural changes in world trade patterns due to globalisation
3.           In order to establish the
link between the redundancies and major structural changes in world trade
patterns due to globalisation, Germany argues that manroland is a printing
machinery manufacturer and produces sheetfed offset presses as well as reel-fed
offset printing machinery. manroland has long been recognised internationally
for its high engineering standards and for manufacturing high-quality products.
4.           The printing machinery
equipment market is highly internationalised. manroland, together with its
German and other European competitors, already operates on a world-wide basis.
During recent years, emerging markets such as China, India and South American
countries, e.g. Brazil, increased their demand for printing machinery and
therefore became important customers for German and other European printing
machinery manufacturers. Increasingly, however, they have also become important
players in their own right on the supply side of an increasingly global market.
Producers China, India, South America, as well as a growing number of
competitors from Eastern Europe, the USA and Japan, have all achieved rising
market shares during the past decade. As a result, German high-quality
producers now face stiff international competition, mostly of lower quality and
at lower prices.
5.           The trend to
internationally more integrated markets is accompanied by permanent structural
changes in the use of printing techniques and a higher degree of specialisation
of suppliers in some sub-sectors. With a bigger number of international
suppliers on the one hand and changing printing techniques on the other, the
average producer of printing machinery serves a smaller share of the market.
Sales go down, profits sink and employers have to consider redundancies. Over
the past few years, manroland followed this pattern in its response to globalisation.
6.           The German authorities
also mention examples of protectionism in the market for printing machinery.
They argue that India has an import duty of 23 % on machinery, and that China,
which is the fastest growing market for manufacturing equipment, uses
subsidies, allows piracy of products, permits lower or inexistent safety
standards at work, little environmental protection, few social norms and no
universal social protection. All this contributes to lower costs of production
and an uneven playing field for foreign competitors.[4] The current Chinese Five-Year
Plan (2011 - 2015) mentions the machinery and equipment sector as one of seven
key industries towards which Chinese State funding is targeted. Such practices have
helped Chinese producers of printing equipment to approach the high
technological standards set by European countries but at labour costs on
average 11 per cent lower than the average European labour costs in the machinery
sector. Consequently, China has become one of the fiercest international
competitors in the sector of printing machinery.[5]
7.           Competitors from outside
China try to avoid the barrier of import duties by delocalising production to other
Asian countries. As a consequence, European printing machinery suppliers
(including manroland) have lost significant international market share since the
mid-2000s decade. Between 2000 and 2004, the world market share of European
producers averaged 67 % but fell to an average of 53 % during the period 2005
to 2011. Imports from non-European suppliers into the EU market for printing
machinery grew from 18 % (average of the years 2000 to 2005) to 24 % (average
of the years 2006 to 2010).[6]

8.           manroland lost 10 % of its
market share for reel-fed offset printing equipment during the period of 2005
to 2011. In addition, between 2000 and 2010 the company experienced phases of
sharp declines in sales. This development contributed to sinking and negative
profits and in the end to the redundancies which gave rise to this application.
Demonstration of the number of
redundancies and compliance with the criteria of Article 2(a)
9.           Germany submitted this
application under the intervention criteria of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC)
No 1927/2006, which requires at least 500 redundancies over a four-month period
in an enterprise in a Member State, including workers made redundant in its
suppliers and downstream producers.
10.         The application cites 2 177
redundancies in manroland AG and 62 in two of its
subsidiaries, as well as 45 in one supplier (Gefinal Systema), making it a
total of 2 284 redundancies, of which 2 239 occurred during the
four-month reference period from 1 January 2012 to 30
April 2012. The redundancies in manroland AG and its subsidiaries were
calculated in accordance with the second indent of the second paragraph of
Article 2 of Regulation (EC No 1927/2006, while those in Gefinal Systema were
calculated in accordance with the first indent of the second paragraph of
Article 2 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
Explanation of the unforeseen nature
of those redundancies
11.         The German authorities
argue that manroland was a world leader in reel-offset printing machinery and
had in the past weathered many ups and downs in the business cycle, giving it
valuable experience in managing leaner times. It had already agreed pay
restraint with its workforce and a gradual reduction of its staffing during
2011 and 2012. Previous losses had been compensated by its owners Allianz
Capital Partners and MAN. In the autumn of 2011, the owners refused to make any
further payments, leading directly to the insolvency by manroland and the
dismissal of a third of its workforce. 
Identification of the dismissing
enterprises and workers targeted for assistance
12.         The application relates to 2 284
redundancies of which 2 177 occurred in manroland AG, a further 62 in two
of its subsidiaries (manroland Vertrieb und Service GmbH and manroland Vertrieb
und Service Deutschland GmbH), and another 45 in the supplier Gefinal Systema
(a metal working company). Of these redundancies, 2 103 are targeted for
the EGF measures.
13.         The break-down of the
targeted workers is as follows:
 Category || Number || Percent 
 Men || 1 836 || 87,30 
 Women || 267 || 12,70 
 EU citizens || 1 979 || 96,96 
 Non EU citizens || 62 || 3,04 
 15-24 years old || 45 || 2,14 
 25-54 years old || 1 514 || 71,99 
 55-64 years old || 543 || 25,82 
 > 64 years old || 1 || 0,05 
14.         For the 62 workers from the
subsidiary enterprises, there is no break-down available in terms of
nationality, hence the percentages in the relevant categories are based on a
total of 2 041.
15.         Among the targeted workers,
there are 142 with long-standing health problems or disabilities.
16.         In terms of occupational
categories, the break-down is as follows:
 Category || Number || Percent 
 Legislators, senior officials and managers || 15 || 0,73 
 Professionals || 93 || 4,56 
 Technicians and associate professionals || 273 || 13,38 
 Clerks || 167 || 8,18 
 Craft and related trade workers || 93 || 4,56 
 Plant & machine operators & assemblers || 1 321 || 64,72 
 Elementary occupations || 79 || 3,87 
17.         For the 62 workers from the
subsidiary enterprises, there is no break-down available in terms of occupational
categories, hence the percentages in this table are based on a total of 2 041.
18.         In accordance with Article
7 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, Germany has confirmed that a policy of
equality between women and men as well as non-discrimination has been applied,
and will continue to apply, during the various stages of the implementation of
and, in particular, in access to the EGF.
Description of the territory
concerned and its authorities and stakeholders
19.         These redundancies concern
three rather different regions of Germany. The first is Augsburg (Bavaria), the
second Offenbach (Hessen) and the third Plauen (Saxony). Other neighbouring
major towns are also affected by the closure and the redundancies, including
Aschaffenburg, Wiesbaden, Darmstadt and Frankfurt / Main.
20.         The weakest of these is
Plauen, located in the eastern part of Germany, with a small population but a
high dependency on social welfare payments. The insolvency of manroland now
removes the third largest employer of the area (700 workers prior to the
closure) and one of only three that were of a sufficient size to have
collective wage agreements with their workers.
Expected impact of the redundancies
as regards local, regional or national employment
21.         manroland before its
insolvency employed 6,500 workers. It was a modern manufacturer of machinery
with modern know-how and attractive pay rates. The break-up of this enterprise
(with a loss of one third of its workforce) will bring with it a loss of
skills, potentially affecting other employers and the regions concerned.
Workers finding a new job will have to accept a lower wage level, which will in
turn reduce their purchasing power and the cash-flow within the local economy.
The three regions will in addition lose one of the most influential employers,
with no immediate prospect of an equivalent successor arising in the near
future.
22.         Many of the workers had been
employed by manroland for lengthy periods, and had gained high wage levels as a
result of seniority. Because of their age, it will be hard for them to find a
new job quickly, and almost impossible to reach the same salary levels again.
23.         The table below shows the
unemployment rates in the affected areas and their rate of change compared with
the same month of the previous year.
 Region || Unemployment rate February 2012 || Change in unemployment February 2012 / February 2011 
 Germany || 7,9 ||   
 Augsburg || 5,4 || +4,5 % 
 Offenbach || 8,3 || +6,7 % 
 Plauen || 11,7 || +2,9 % 
Co-ordinated package of personalised
services to be funded and a breakdown of its estimated costs, including its
complementarity with actions funded by the Structural Funds
24.         The social partners
involved in manroland adopted a social plan in January 2012, which includes the
establishment of transfer companies for the redundant workers. For Augsburg and
Plauen, the co-ordinator is PTG (Projekt- und Trainingsgesellschaft), and its
transfer company will run from 1 February 2012 to 31 January 2013. For
Offenbach, the transfer company is PRM Personalentwicklungs-gesellschaft, which
will run from 1 February 2012 to 31 July 2012, with the possibility of
extending its duration.
25.         The following measures are
proposed :
–     
Short-time allowance
(Transferkurzarbeitergeld): This is a subsistence
allowance paid by the public employment services on the basis of the net salary
previously earned by the worker. The level is set at 60 % of the former net
salary, rising to 67 % if at least one child is resident in the household
of the recipient. manroland has undertaken to pay the difference between this
amount and 80 % of the former salary. Germany estimates that on average this
will be paid to each worker for 6 to 8 months. In the budget for this measure,
deduction is made for the allowances used to co-fund the ESF funded training
during the initial phase, and further deductions are budgeted for periods
during which the workers are not engaged in active labour market policy
measures. The allowance will be paid to the 2 001 workers who decided to
join the transfer company. The 102 workers expected to participate in the
measures, but not in the transfer company, will receive unemployment benefit
(not included in the EGF package).
–     
Training courses leading to qualifications :
These courses will be aimed mostly at the former employees of the subsidiaries
and the supplier, as the former employees of manroland AG are already well
qualified and will be offered more specialised courses to build on their
existing qualifications. The trainees will be given the opportunity to choose
the most appropriate courses for themselves, building on the initial interview
and profiling. Both soft and hard skills will be offered, and certification of
existing skills gained through experience on the job will be provided. The
duration of courses will vary between 3 and 100 days.
–     
Workshops and Peer Groups : These will be
created in various constellations, e.g. for older workers, for disabled workers,
by type of training, etc. as required. Each group will have its own mentor.
–     
Ancillary measures and international job-search
: The programme will provide the redundant workers with the possibility to take
a number of tests, including psychological tests, health check-ups, tests of
competence. They will be helped to obtain job references and any preventive
health measures required by future employers (e.g. vaccinations). Participation
in job fairs, language courses, translation of previous qualifications,
intercultural training, etc. will be offered as required.
–     
In-depth start-up advice : Redundant workers
wishing to start their own businesses can obtain support for planning,
implementing and funding their business ventures. In addition, basic
competences in business management, marketing and sales will be conveyed.
Individual advice and coaching will be available, as will contacts with
networks and various specific experts (lawyers, tax consultants, marketing,
banking, etc.)
–     
Job search : The transfer companies use their
contacts with employers in their regions to obtain information on upcoming job
vacancies that have not yet been published. It then seeks the most suited
candidates from the pool of EGF workers to put them in touch with the potential
employers. Should they need to close a gap in their skills, the necessary
training will be provided.
–     
Activation premium : This is to help redundant
workers to decide to accept a lower paid job (at least 10 % lower than their
previous gross salary). This is a once-only premium, paid at EUR 4 000 at
the start of the EGF measures and degressive to EUR 1 000 if taken up
towards the end of the implementation phase.
–     
Coaching and advisory services in a new job and
during unemployment : Once a redundant worker has accepted a new job and still requires
some support, a coach from the transfer company can continue to provide advice
and ensure that the worker can settle in optimally. Those workers who have not
found a new job at the time the transfer company ends, will receive further
mentoring from the relevant staff, who will also help them to compile their
personnel files for future reference.
26.         The expenditure for
implementing the EGF, which is included in the application in accordance with
Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, covers preparatory,
management and control activities as well as information and publicity. This
includes regular meetings with the social partners and other stakeholders, with
whom both the necessity of an EGF application and its content was already discussed
prior to the application being submitted. Information activities include a web
site highlighting the positive effects of the EGF.
27.         The personalised services
presented by the German authorities are active labour market measures within
the eligible actions defined by Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The German
authorities estimate the total costs at EUR 10 705 889, of which
the expenditure for personalised services at EUR 10 305 889 and
the expenditure for implementing the EGF at EUR 400 000 (3,74 %
of the total amount). The total contribution requested from the EGF is EUR 5 352 944
(50 % of the total costs).
 Actions || Estimated number of workers targeted || Estimated cost per worker targeted (EUR) || Total costs (EGF and national cofinancing) (EUR) 
 Personalised services (first paragraph of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006) 
 Short-time allowance (Transferkurzarbeitergeld) || 2 001 || 2 727,67 || 5 458 067,67 
 Training courses leading to qualifications (Qualifizierungsmassnahmen) || 770 || 2 293,01 || 1 765 617,70 
 Workshops and peer groups || 1 453 || 327,58 || 475 973,74 
 Ancillary measures and international job search (Flankierende und internationale Unterstuetzung) || 1 135 || 186,01 || 211 121,35 
 In-depth start-up advice (Existenzgruenderberatung) || 60 || 621,93 || 37 315,80 
 Job search (Stellenresearch) || 1 050 || 275,19 || 288 949,50 
 Activation premium (Aktivierungszuschuss) || 430 || 2 709,92 || 1 165 265,60 
 Coaching and advisory services in a new job and during unemployment (Nachbetreuung) || 1 050 || 860,55 || 903 577,50 
 Sub total personalised services ||   || 10 305 889 
 Expenditure for implementing EGF (third paragraph of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006) 
 Preparatory activities ||   || 20 000 
 Management ||   || 340 000 
 Information and publicity ||   || 20 000 
 Control activities ||   || 20 000 
 Sub total expenditure for implementing EGF ||   || 400 000 
 Total estimated costs ||   || 10 705 889 
 EGF contribution (50 % of total costs) ||   || 5 352 944 
28.         Germany confirms that the
measures described above are complementary with actions funded by the
Structural Funds. The early measures taken in support of this group of workers
(from 1 February 2012) are being co-funded by the European Social Fund from its
ESF-BA operational programme. There will be a clear demarkation between these
measures and those co-funded by the EGF. The German authorities have confirmed
that the necessary provisions are in place to prevent any double financing by
EU financial instruments.
29.         Germany further states in
its application that the EGF package is a significant value added over and
above what would have been possible with national and ESF funds. This includes
more costly types of training, longer courses leading to better qualifications,
and a longer period to support the workers than would have been possible for a
transfer company in the absence of EGF funding.
Date(s) on which the personalised
services to the affected workers were started or are planned to start
30.         Germany will start the
personalised services to the affected workers included in the co-ordinated
package proposed for co-financing to the EGF on 1 August 2012. This date
therefore represents the beginning of the period of eligibility for any
assistance that might be awarded from the EGF.
Procedures for consulting the social
partners
31.         The social partners and
other stakeholders have been involved in the planning and implementation of
this application from the outset. On 16 April 2012, a round table meeting was
organised between all stakeholders including the worker representatives, at
which the key data of the EGF application were presented and the support of all
parties was given. In addition, the various stakeholders decided to collaborate
closely in the implementation of the measures.
32.         The German authorities
confirmed that the requirements laid down in national and EU legislation
concerning collective redundancies have been complied with.
Information on actions that are
mandatory by virtue of national law or pursuant to collective agreements
33.         As regards the criteria
contained in Article 6 of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, the German authorities
in their application:
·      confirmed that the financial contribution from the EGF does not
replace measures which are the responsibility of companies by virtue of
national law or collective agreements;
·      demonstrated that the actions provide support for individual workers
and are not to be used for restructuring companies or sectors;
·      confirmed that the eligible actions referred to above do not receive
assistance from other EU financial instruments.
Management and control systems 
34.         Germany has notified the
Commission that the financial contribution will be administered by the same
bodies which also administered the previous EGF contributions to Germany -- within
the Federal Ministry for Labour and Social Affairs (Bundesministerium für
Arbeit und Soziales) the 'Gruppe Europaïsche Fonds für Beschäftigung – Referat
EF 3' will act as managing authority and the 'Organisationseinheit Prüfbehörde'
as control authority also for this case.
Financing
35.         On the basis of the
application from Germany, the proposed contribution from the EGF to the
coordinated package of personalised services (including
expenditure to implement EGF) is EUR 5 352 944,
representing 50 % of the total cost. The Commission's proposed allocation
under the Fund is based on the information made available by Germany.
36.         Considering the maximum
possible amount of a financial contribution from the EGF under Article 10(1) of
Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006, as well as the scope for reallocating
appropriations, the Commission proposes to mobilise the EGF for the total amount
referred to above, to be allocated under heading 1a of the financial framework.
37.         The proposed amount of financial
contribution will leave more than 25 % of the maximum annual amount
earmarked for the EGF available for allocations during the last four months of
the year, as required by Article 12(6) of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
38.         By presenting this proposal
to mobilise the EGF, the Commission initiates the simplified trialogue
procedure, as required by Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May
2006, with a view to securing the agreement of the two arms of the budgetary
authority on the need to use the EGF and the amount required. The Commission
invites the first of the two arms of the budgetary authority that reaches
agreement on the draft mobilisation proposal, at appropriate political level,
to inform the other arm and the Commission of its intentions. In case of
disagreement by either of the two arms of the budgetary authority, a formal
trialogue meeting will be convened.
39.         The Commission presents separately
a transfer request in order to enter in the 2012 budget specific commitment
appropriations, as required in Point 28 of the Interinstitutional Agreement of
17 May 2006.
Source of payment appropriations 
40.         Appropriations from the EGF
budget line will be used to cover the amount of EUR 5 352 944 needed
for the present application.
Proposal for a
DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL
on the mobilisation of the European
Globalisation Adjustment Fund in accordance with point 28 of the
Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament,
the Council and the Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial
management (application EGF/2012/002 DE/manroland from Germany)
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to the Interinstitutional
Agreement of 17 May 2006 between the European Parliament, the Council and the
Commission on budgetary discipline and sound financial management[7], and in particular point 28
thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EC) No
1927/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006
establishing the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund[8], and in particular Article
12(3) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European
Commission[9],
Whereas:
(1)       The European Globalisation
Adjustment Fund (EGF) was established to provide additional support for workers
made redundant as a result of major structural changes in world trade patterns due
to globalisation and to assist them with their reintegration into the labour
market.
(2)       The Interinstitutional
Agreement of 17 May 2006 allows the mobilisation of the EGF within the annual
ceiling of EUR 500 million.
(3)       Germany submitted an
application to mobilise the EGF, in respect of redundancies in the enterprise manroland AG and two of its subsidiaries, as well as one supplier, on 4 May 2012 and supplemented it by
additional information up to 10 July 2012. This
application complies with the requirements for determining the financial
contributions as laid down in Article 10 of
Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006. The Commission, therefore,
proposes to mobilise an amount of EUR 5 352 944.
(4)       The EGF should, therefore,
be mobilised in order to provide a financial contribution for the application
submitted by Germany,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
For the general budget of the European
Union for the financial year 2012, the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund
(EGF) shall be mobilised to provide the sum of EUR 5 352 944 in
commitment and payment appropriations.
Article 2
This Decision shall be published in the Official
Journal of the European Union.
Done at Brussels, 
For the European Parliament                       For
the Council
The President                                                 The
President
[1]               OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.
[2]               OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1.
[3]               In accordance with the third paragraph of Article 3
of Regulation (EC) No 1927/2006.
[4]               Gisela Lanza, Thomas Ender, Dennis Schuler, Stevens
Peters (2011), Chancen und Risiken des deutschen Maschinen- und Anlagenbaus in
der chinesischen Automobilindustrie, Global Advanced Manufacturing Institute
and Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
[5]               European Commission (2011),
Study on the Future Opportunities and Challenges of EU-China Trade and
Investment Relations. Study 1: Machinery, p. 3.
[6]               Sources : manroland AG,
market research
[7]               OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p. 1.
[8]               OJ L 406, 30.12.2006, p. 1.
[9]               OJ C […], […], p. […].