CELEX: C2005/031/42
Language: en
Date: 2005-02-05 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 September 2004 in Case T- 213/02: SNF SA v Commission of the European Communities (Action for annulment — Directive 2002/34/EC — Restrictions on the use of polyacrylamides in the composition of cosmetic products — Person individually concerned — Admissibility)

5.2.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 31/21
            
         
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 6 September 2004
   in Case T- 213/02: SNF SA v Commission of the European Communities (1)
   
   (Action for annulment - Directive 2002/34/EC - Restrictions on the use of polyacrylamides in the composition of cosmetic products - Person individually concerned - Admissibility)
   (2005/C 31/42)
   Language of the case: English
   In Case T-213/02: SNF SA, established in Saint-Étienne (France), represented by K. Van Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communities, (Agent: X. Lewis, with an address for service in Luxembourg) – application for the partial annulment of Twenty-sixth Commission Directive 2002/34/EC of 15 April 2002 adapting to technical progress Annexes II, III and VII to Council Directive 76/768/EEC on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to cosmetic products (OJ 2002 L 102, p. 19) in so far as it restricts the use of polyacrylamides in the composition of cosmetic products – the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Lindh, President, R. García-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 6 September 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as inadmissible;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The applicant is to bear its own costs and those of the defendant.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 233 of 28.9.2002.