CELEX: 62012FA0103
Language: en
Date: 2013-11-05 00:00:00
Title: Case F-103/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 November 2013 — Doyle v Europol (Civil service — Europol staff — Non-renewal of a contract — Refusal to grant a contract of an indefinite duration — Annulment by the Tribunal — Compliance with the judgment of the Tribunal)

21.12.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 377/21
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 5 November 2013 — Doyle v Europol
   (Case F-103/12) (1)
   
   (Civil service - Europol staff - Non-renewal of a contract - Refusal to grant a contract of an indefinite duration - Annulment by the Tribunal - Compliance with the judgment of the Tribunal)
   2013/C 377/48
   Language of the case: Dutch
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Margaret Doyle (Noordwijkerhout, Netherlands) (represented by: W.J. Dammingh and N.D. Dane, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Police Office (represented by: D. Neumann and D. El Khoury, Agents, B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Application to annul Europol’s decision, taken to implement the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 29 June 2010 in Case F-37/09 Doyle v Europol, by which Europol granted the applicant a lump sum by way of compensation for the harm caused to him by the decision annulled by that judgment
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of 28 November 2011 by which the European Police Office granted Ms Doyle the sum of EUR 3 000 in order to comply with the judgment of the Tribunal of 29 June 2010 in Case F-37/09 Doyle v Europol;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the European Police Office to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Mrs Doyle.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 26, 26.01.2013, p. 70.