CELEX: 62016TN0724
Language: en
Date: 2016-10-12 00:00:00
Title: Case T-724/16 P: Appeal brought on 12 October 2016 by Giorgio Cocchi and Nicola Falcione against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 August 2016 in Case F-134/11, Cocchi and Falcione v Commission

28.11.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 441/34
            
         
      Appeal brought on 12 October 2016 by Giorgio Cocchi and Nicola Falcione against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 2 August 2016 in Case F-134/11, Cocchi and Falcione v Commission
      (Case T-724/16 P)
      (2016/C 441/40)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Appellants: Giorgio Cocchi (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) and Nicola Falcione (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by S. Orlandi, lawyer)
      
         Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
      
         Form of order sought by the appellant
      
      The applicants claim that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  Set aside the order of the Civil Service Tribunal in Case F-134/11, Cocchi and Falcione v Commission;
               
            and, giving judgment itself:
      
                  —
               
               
                  Annul the decision of 9 March 2011 refusing the requests for assistance;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Order the Commission pay the amounts of EUR 22 000 to Mr Falcione and EUR 35 000 to Mr Cocchi, in respect of the damage which they have suffered;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Order the Commission to pay the costs of both instances.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the Civil Service Tribunal erred in law in its assessment of the appellants’ interest in pursuing the proceedings. The appellants, it is claimed, have more than a mere administrative interest in having their appeal upheld.