CELEX: 62014FA0065
Language: en
Date: 2015-06-09 00:00:00
Title: Case F-65/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 June 2015 — EF v EEAS (Civil service — Member of staff of the EEAS — Officials — 2013 promotion procedure — Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 — Applicant’s objection to the list of officials proposed for promotion — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Completion of a minimum of 2 years in the grade — Calculation of the two-year period — Date of the promotion decision)

27.7.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 245/48
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 9 June 2015 — EF v EEAS
   (Case F-65/14) (1)
   
   ((Civil service - Member of staff of the EEAS - Officials - 2013 promotion procedure - Decision not to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 - Applicant’s objection to the list of officials proposed for promotion - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Completion of a minimum of 2 years in the grade - Calculation of the two-year period - Date of the promotion decision))
   (2015/C 245/59)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: EF (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the decisions refusing to promote the applicant to grade AD 13 under the 2013 promotion procedure even though he was included on the list of official eligible for promotion.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Declares that EF is to bear his own costs and orders him to pay the costs incurred by the European External Action Service.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 380, 27/10/2014, p. 26.