CELEX: 52014PC0538
Language: en
Date: 2014-08-28
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION authorising Germany to apply a reduced rate of taxation on electricity directly provided to vessels at berth in a port in accordance with Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC

|
			
		
		
		52014PC0538
		
			Proposal for a COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION authorising Germany to apply a reduced rate of taxation on electricity directly provided to vessels at berth in a port in accordance with Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC /* COM/2014/0538 final - 2014/0247 (NLE) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
Taxation of energy products and electricity
in the Union is governed by Council Directive 2003/96/EC ([1]) (hereafter referred to
as the ‘Energy Taxation Directive’ or the ‘Directive’).
Pursuant to Article 19(1) of the Directive,
in addition to the provisions foreseen in particular in its Articles 5, 15 and
17, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may
authorise any Member State to introduce further exemptions or reductions in the
level of taxation for specific policy considerations.
The objective of this proposal is to allow Germany to apply a reduced rate of electricity tax to electricity directly provided to
vessels at berth in a port (hereafter referred to as ‘shore-side electricity’).
This exemption is meant to give an economic incentive to the use of shore-side
electricity in order to reduce air pollution in port cities.
The request and its general context
On 12 July 2011 the Council adopted Council
Implementing Decision 2011/445/EU authorising Germany to apply a reduced rate
of electricity tax to electricity directly provided to vessels at berth in a
port (‘shore-side electricity’) in accordance with Article 19 of Directive
2003/96/EC ([2]).
This Decision expires on 16 July 2014.
By letter dated 26 February 2014, the
German authorities requested a new authorisation decision which will allow Germany to continue to apply the tax reduction. Germany has requested the reduction to be
granted for six years.
With the requested measure Germany wants to
continue to provide an incentive for the use of shore-side electricity which is
considered a less polluting alternative to the generation of electricity on
board of vessels lying at berth in a port. If the measure is not authorised shore-side
electricity will have to be taxed at the general national rate of the
electricity tax, which is EUR 20.50 per MWh. 
On the other hand, Article 14(1)(c) of the
Energy Taxation Directive obliges Member States to exempt energy products used
as fuel by ships for navigation within EU waters. This exemption covers also
the energy products used to produce electricity on board ships at berth in
ports. Member States may also exempt energy products used by ships for
navigation on inland waterways according to Article 15(1)(f) thereof which also
covers the production of electricity on board. Thus in most cases the system of
taxation based on the Energy Taxation Directive does not affect the costs for
producing electricity on board a ship at berth in a port even though such
production could have negative health and environmental effects by
deteriorating air quality and increasing noise levels in ports.
Germany would like
to continue to apply a reduced rate of EUR 0,50 per MWh to shore-side
electricity, thereby respecting the minimum rate of taxation for electricity as
laid down in Directive 2003/96/EC. The reduced rate of electricity taxation is
to apply to all supplies of shore-side electricity in both EU waters as well as
inland waterways, with the exception of private pleasure crafts. According to
the calculations of the German authorities for the three-year period of
application of the measure, the average annual tax expenditure was
approximately EUR 2.2 million. According to the Federal Government
estimates, during the next six years this hypothetical budgetary expenditure
can be expected to gradually increase to EUR 3‑4 million per
year.
With the tax reduction Germany wants to continue to provide an incentive for vessel operators to use shore-side
electricity in order to reduce pollution from airborne emissions and noise from
vessels at berth as well as CO2 emissions. The application of a
reduced tax rate would strengthen the competitiveness of shore-side electricity
relative to the burning of bunker fuels on board, which is fully tax exempt.
The German authorities informed the
Commission that at present of all German sea ports, only the port of Lübeck has facilities to provide shore-side electricity of higher electrical load. Besides
on-shore facilities, the port provides also ‘power barges’, i.e. floating
installations for combined heat and power generation running on liquefied
natural gas. The building of static shore-side electricity supply facilities in
the port of Hamburg is planned for May 2014 and it includes equipping two
cruise ship terminals with shore-side electricity facilities at the Altona
terminal. There are also plans for providing power barges for the HafenCity
terminal.
As regards inland ports, shore-side
electricity facilities are more widespread and there are plans for further
development.
Germany considers that this measure is in
line with Commission Recommendation 2006/339/EC ([3]) on the promotion of
shore-side electricity for use by ships at berth in EU ports and with the
Commission Communication Strategic goals and recommendations for the EU's
maritime transport policy until 2018 ([4]).
In this regard, it is noted that from June 2011 on, Member States have an
unconditional obligation to meet air quality standards for relevant pollutants
like particulate matter ([5]).
This requires Member States to find solutions to problems such as ship
emissions at berth in ports where this is relevant and it is conceivable that
in ports where these problems exist, the use of shore-side electricity will be
encouraged as one element of an overall air quality strategy.
Arguments of the German authorities
concerning the impact of the measure on the internal market
The German authorities claim that the
measure would not affect the proper functioning of the internal market and
would not lead to a distortion of competition. Germany allows the tax advantage
to be provided both as a reduced tax rate charged at supply and as a tax
refund. In case of application of the reduction at supply, the electricity
provider might not pass on or pass on only part of the tax advantage to the
final consumer, i.e. the ship operator. Still according to the German
authorities the tax advantage is normally passed on. But even in the cases
where the tax reduction is fully passed on to the ship operators which receive
shore-side electricity taxed at the minimum level provided for in Directive
2003/96/EC, they do not actually gain an economic advantage over operators
generating their own electricity on board because this electricity is exempted
from taxation. According to the German authorities substitution of own
generation on board by shore-side electricity taxed at the applicable minimum
level would not lead to an overall cost advantage.
The German authorities informed the
Commission that at this juncture they do not have figures on the number of ship
operators using shore-side electricity facilities and cannot provide a full
assessment of the trend of shore-side electricity use due to the short period
of application of the measure. On the basis of the available information they
consider that there was a considerable increase in the use of shore-side
electricity in particular for vessels at berth in ports situated on the inland
waterways.
Existing provisions in the area of the
proposal
Council Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October
2003 restructuring the Community framework for the taxation of energy products
and electricity, in particular Articles 14(1)(c) and 15(1)(f).
Assessment of the measure under
Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC
Specific policy considerations
Article 19(1), first subparagraph, of the
Directive reads as follows:
‘In addition
to the provisions set out in the previous Articles, in particular in Articles
5, 15 and 17, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the
Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce further exemptions or
reductions for specific policy considerations.’
By means of the tax reduction in question
the German authorities pursue the objective to continue to promote an
environmentally less harmful way for ships to satisfy their electricity needs
while lying at berth in ports and thereby to improve local air quality. As
Germany has pointed out, the Commission has in fact already recommended the use
of shore-side electricity as an alternative to the generation of electricity on
board the vessels at berth and thereby recognised its environmental advantages ([6]).Without the measure electricity
supplied to vessels at berth will have to be taxed at EUR 20.50 per MWh in
Germany. The requested reduction represents an additional incentive for the use
of this technology equal to EUR 20 per MWh and therefore contributes to
the stated policy objective.
The Commission also notes that an important
obstacle to a more widespread use of shore-side electricity is currently the
almost total absence of the necessary onshore infrastructure in ports and that
therefore additional initiatives addressing in particular the built-up of this
infrastructure are likely to be necessary to achieve the policy objective of
the tax exemption in question. According to the information provided by the
German authorities, sea-going vessels demand facilities capable of supporting
high electrical loads and at present only the port of Lübeck provides such
facilities. There are plans to construct facilities in the port of Hamburg. Shore-side electricity facilities are available in higher numbers at the
inland waterway ports where vessels normally have smaller electrical load
requirements.
As regards the nature of the policy
objective pursued the Commission would point out that the promotion of
shore-side electricity is in fact a common policy objective that should be
pursued by the Union as a whole. This is stated clearly in the Commission
Communication – An integrated maritime policy for the European Union ([7]) and the accompanying
Commission staff working document ([8]).
The measure is in line with the Commission proposal for a directive on the
deployment of alternative fuels infrastructure which addresses the issue of
installing shore-side electricity supply facilities in ports where this is
cost-effective and presents environmental benefits ([9]).
The Commission suggested shore-side
electricity provided to ships while at berth in port to be exempted from energy
taxation in its proposal for revision of the Energy Taxation Directive ([10]).However the
Commission proposal has not been adopted yet by the Council. In the meantime
economic operators in Germany and the German authorities should be provided
with legal certainty as regards the tax measures applied for the purpose of
promoting the use of shore-side electricity. Currently the only possibility to
introduce a favourable tax treatment to shore-side electricity is provided by
Article 19. However its purpose is to react to specific circumstances in individual
Member States that are not reflected in the Directive itself. A derogation on
the basis of Article 19 which pursues the policy objective of promoting
shore-side electricity can therefore only be granted as a transitional measure
before this objective has been addressed by the Council in the context of a
revision of Directive 2003/96/EC.
Consistency with the other policies
and objectives of the Union
The requested measure concerns mainly the
EU's environmental policy. To the extent that it will help to reduce the
burning of bunker fuels on board the vessels in ports the measure will in fact
contribute to the objective of improving local air quality. The measure might
also, to a limited extent, lead to a reduction of CO2 emissions,
although the significance of this effect will depend on the source of the
electricity to be provided to the vessels ([11]). To indicate the
scale of the environmental problem, Germany gives the example of the port of
Lübeck-Travemünde where ships account for 90 % of sulphur dioxide and
around 80 % of nitrogen oxide emissions. The German authorities provide the
following comparison, based on annual electricity consumption of
5 584 MWh, between the estimated annual emissions resulting from the use
of shore-side electricity in the port of Lübeck and those from the use of
marine gas oil, meeting sulphur content limits set in the EU Sulphur Directive ([12]), used to generate
electricity on-board:
   || NOx || SO2 || CO2 
 Green electricity from hydropower || 0.078 t || 0.056 t || 0 t 
 Marine gas oil || 3.571 t || 6.026 t || 4251.9 t 
Estimates provided by the Hamburg port
authorities indicate that the planned shore-side electricity facilities should
reduce on an annual basis emissions compared to the use of marine gas oil at the
Altona terminal by about 39 t or by 74 % for NOx, about 1.1 t or
62 % for SO2 and about 0.5 t or 5 % for fine
particulate matter. Running these facilities with the normal German electricity
mix should result in a reduction in CO2 of approximately 1 050 t
or 19 % per year. The planned supply of electricity from renewable sources
could lead to a much bigger reduction of CO2 emissions of 3 354 t
per year, depending on the performance of the electricity generation
facilities. The reduction in air pollutant emissions through the use of power
barges running on liquefied natural gas supplying electricity for cruise liners
at the HafenCity terminal should result in a reduction of 51 t or 73 %
for NOx emissions. After deducting 5 t of annual NOx emissions from the
barges the result in total is emission reduction of 46 t per year.
Emissions should be reduced by 1.5 t or 58 % for SOx and 0.7 t
or 48 % per year for fine particulate matter with no additional emissions from
the power barges. CO2 emissions should be reduced by 1 824 t
or 26 % per year if liquefied natural gas were used instead of marine gas
oil. Residual emissions from the auxiliary boiler (for on-board heat) have been
taken into account in the estimations.
It has to be recalled at this point that
one important reason for the unfavourable competitive position of shore-side
electricity lies in the fact that the alternative, i.e. electricity produced on
board the vessels while in maritime ports, currently enjoys a full net tax
exemption: not only is the bunker fuel burnt for generating the electricity exempted
from taxation, which corresponds to the normal position under Article 14(1)(a)
of Directive 2003/96/EC, but also the electricity produced on board the vessels
is itself exempted (cf. Article 14(1)(c) of Directive 2003/96/EC). Although the
latter exemption could as such be considered difficult to reconcile with the
environmental objectives of the Union, it mirrors considerations of
practicability. In fact, taxation of the electricity produced on board would
require a declaration by the ship owner - often established in a third country
- or operator of the amount of electricity consumed. The declaration would
furthermore have to determine the share of the electricity consumed in the
territorial waters of the Member State where the tax is due. It would create a
huge administrative burden for ship-owners to have to make such declarations
for every Member States whose territorial waters are concerned. Under these
circumstances it can be justified not to penalize the less-polluting
alternative of shore-side electricity by allowing Germany to apply a reduced
rate of taxation.
As regards electricity consumed by vessels
at berth in ports along inland waterways, and contrary to the situation
obtaining in maritime ports, exemption of the electricity produced on board is
merely optional for Member States (Article 15(1)(f)). Therefore, no legal
obstacle would prevent Member States from treating equally shore-side
electricity and on-board generation in ports along inland waterways. However,
the option offered by Article 15(1)(f) of the Directive not to tax electricity
generated on board is again to be explained by considerations of practicability
on the part of the legislator and at the same time closely linked to the
optional tax advantages for the purposes of navigation on inland waterways. The
majority of Member States, among which Germany, have decided not to tax fuels
used for these purposes. As far as the Rhine and its tributaries are concerned,
this tax exemption is furthermore enshrined in an international agreement ([13]), which Germany has ratified. It is also considered impractical to tax separately the input fuel
used for the generation of electricity on board ([14]) because this would
presuppose, at the very least, a distinction between the fuel used for the
generation of electricity and for navigation. Finally, in deciding whether to
extend the tax exemption applicable to maritime shipping to fuels used for
navigation on inland waterways, Member States will take into consideration a
number of aspects, including wider objectives of national transport policy such
as environmental considerations, which may lead them not to tax fuels used for
these purposes.
It is therefore considered justified, at
the present stage, to keep the possibility for Germany to exempt shore-side
electricity to ports in inland waterways.
Internal market and fair competition
From the point of view of the internal
market and fair competition the measure requested would reduce the existing
distortion between two competing sources of electricity for boats at berth,
i.e. on board generation and shore-side electricity, caused by the tax
exemption for bunker fuels.
As regards competition between vessel
operators, it first has to be reiterated that according to the information
available to the Commission there are currently very few vessels which use
shore-side electricity on a commercial basis. Second, even if the measure will
provide shipping companies with an advantage in the sense that they will be
able to purchase electricity at lower costs compared to companies operating in
other sectors, the examined measure is not expected to alter significantly the
competitive situation within the shipping sector. Although precise cost
projections depend crucially on the development of the oil price and are therefore
very difficult, the available information ([15]) and the data provided
by Germany indicate that overall even a full tax exemption would in most cases
not reduce operational costs of shore-side electricity below the costs of
on-board generation and would therefore not, in any event, represent a
significant competitive benefit on vessel operators using shore-side
electricity as opposed to those using on-board generation. In the present case,
a significant distortion of the above mentioned kind can all the less be
expected since Germany will respect the minimum level of taxation prescribed by
Directive 2003/96/EC.
Concerning competition between ports, in a
situation where, as stated above, the use of shore-side electricity is, at
least in the short term, unlikely to become more economically feasible than
on-board generation in spite of the tax reduction, this tax reduction for
shore-side electricity is also unlikely to significantly distort competition
between ports by inducing vessels to change their itinerary according to the
availability of this option. The German authorities stress that the use of
shore-side electricity is restricted not only due to the lack of port
facilities or the higher costs but also because of lack of internationally
agreed technical standards for connecting vessels to the electricity grid.
Finally, it can be added that the timeframe
for which it is proposed to authorize the application of a reduced tax rate reflects
to a large extent the timeframe in the Commission proposal of eight years for
the tax exemption for shore-side electricity.  
Period of application of the measure
and development of the EU framework on energy taxation
In principle, the period of application of
the derogation should be long enough in order not to discourage port operators
from making the necessary investments. In this particular case the period of
application of the measure would have been prolonged and the scale of the tax
reduction increased by the Commission proposal for revision of the Energy
Taxation Directive which envisages an obligatory exemption for shore-side
electricity for a period of eight years after its entry into effect. Still the
derogation should not undermine future developments of the existing legal
framework and should take into account the possible adoption by the Council of
a legal act based on the Commission proposal for amendment of the Energy
Taxation Directive. Under these circumstances, it appears appropriate to grant
the authorisation requested for the maximum period of six years allowed by the
Directive, subject however to the entry into application of general provisions
in the matter, at a point in time earlier than the expiry thus foreseen. This
period of time will provide legal certainty to ship and port operators which
have to plan their investments in shore-side electricity facilities or on-board
equipment. It will also allow the German authorities to collect more data for a
future reassessment of the measure.
State aid rules
The tax rate of EUR 0.50 per MWh
envisaged by the German authorities respects the minimum level of taxation
pursuant to Article 10 of Directive 2003/96/EC. The
measure thus fulfils one of the conditions laid down in Article 44 of
Commission Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 ([16]),
which stipulates the conditions under which such a measure is exempted from the
State aid notification requirements. However it cannot be established at this
stage whether all the conditions set in the Regulation are fulfilled and the
proposal for a Council Implementing Decision does not prevent the Commission
from requiring from Germany to comply with State aid rules.
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS
WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
Consultation of interested parties
This proposal is based on a request made by
 Germany and concerns only this Member State.
Collection and use of expertise
There was no need for external expertise.
Impact assessment
This proposal concerns an authorisation for
an individual Member State upon its own request.
3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE
PROPOSAL
Subsidiarity principle
The field of indirect taxation covered by
Article 113 TFEU is not in itself within the exclusive competence of the
European Union within the meaning of Article 3 TFEU.
However, the exercise by Member States of
their competences in this field is strictly circumscribed and limited by
existing EU law. Pursuant to Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC, only the
Council is empowered to authorise a Member State to introduce further
exemptions or reductions within the meaning of that provision. Member States
cannot substitute themselves for the Council.
The proposal therefore respects the
principle of subsidiarity.
Proportionality principle
The proposal respects the principle of
proportionality. The tax reduction does not exceed what is necessary to attain
the objective in question (cf. the considerations on the Internal market and
fair competition aspects, above).
Choice of instruments
Instrument(s) proposed: Council Decision.
Article 19 of Directive 2003/96 makes
provision for this type of measure only.
4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION
The measure does not impose any financial
or administrative burden on the Union. The proposal therefore has no impact on
the budget of the Union.
2014/0247 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL IMPLEMENTING DECISION
authorising Germany to apply a reduced
rate of taxation on electricity directly provided to vessels at berth in a port
in accordance with Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, 
Having regard to Council Directive
2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework for the
taxation of energy products and electricity ([17]), and in particular
Article 19 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
Whereas:
(1)       By Council Implementing Decision
2011/445/EU Germany was authorised to apply a reduced rate of taxation to electricity
directly provided to vessels at berth in a port (‘shore-side electricity’) in
accordance with Article 19 of Directive 2003/96/EC until 16 July 2014.
(2)       By letter dated 26
February 2014, Germany sought the authorisation to continue to apply a reduced
rate of electricity tax to shore-side electricity pursuant to Article 19 of
Directive 2003/96/EC.
(3)       With the tax reduction it
intends to apply, Germany aims at continuing the promotion of a more widespread
use of shore-side electricity as an environmentally less harmful way for ships
to satisfy their electricity needs while lying at berth in ports as compared to
the burning of bunker fuels on board the vessels.
(4)       In so far as the use of
shore-side electricity avoids emissions of air pollutants associated with the
burning of bunker fuels on board the vessels at berth, it contributes to an
improvement of local air quality in port cities. The measure is therefore
expected to contribute to the environmental, health and climate policy
objectives of the Union.
(5)       Allowing Germany to apply a reduced rate of electricity taxation to shore-side electricity does not go beyond
what is necessary to increase the use of shore-side electricity, since on-board
generation will remain the more competitive alternative in most cases. For the
same reason, and because of the current relatively low degree of market
penetration of the technology, the measure is unlikely to lead to significant
distortions in competition during its lifetime and will thus not negatively
affect the proper functioning of the internal market.
(6)       It follows from Article
19(2) of Directive 2003/96/EC that each authorisation granted under that
provision must be strictly limited in time. Given the need for a period long
enough to allow for the proper evaluation of the measure, but also the need not
to undermine future developments of the existing legal framework, it is
appropriate to grant the authorisation requested for a period of six years,
subject however to the entry into application of general provisions in the
matter, at a point in time earlier than the expiry thus foreseen.
(7)       In order to provide legal
certainty to port and ship operators and to avoid a potential increase in the
administrative burden for the distributors and redistributors of electricity
which could result from changes to the rate of excise duty levied on shore-side
electricity, it should be ensured that Germany can apply the existing specific
tax reduction to which this Decision relates without interruption. The
authorisation requested should therefore be granted with effect from 17 July
2014, following seamlessly on from the prior arrangements under Council
Implementing Decision 2011/445/EU.
(8)       This decision is without
prejudice to the application of the Union rules regarding State aid,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: 
Article 1
Germany is hereby authorised to apply a
reduced rate of electricity taxation to electricity directly supplied to
vessels, other than private pleasure craft, berthed in ports (‘shore-side
electricity’), provided that the minimum levels of taxation pursuant to Article
10 of Directive 2003/96/EC are respected.
Article 2
This Decision shall take effect on the day
of its notification.
It shall apply from 17 July 2014.
It shall expire on 16 July 2020.
However, should the Council, acting on the
basis of Article 113 TFEU, provide for general rules on tax advantages for
shore-side electricity, this Decision shall cease to apply on the day on which
those general rules become applicable.
Article 3
This Decision is addressed to the Federal
Republic of Germany.
Done at Brussels,
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
([1])            Council
Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 restructuring the Community framework
for the taxation of energy products and electricity (OJ L 283, 31.10.2003, p.
51).
([2])            OJ
L 191, 22.07.2011, p. 22.
([3])            Commission
Recommendation 2006/339/EC of 8 May 2006 on the promotion of shore-side electricity
for use by ships at berth in Community ports (OJ L 125, 12.5.2006).
([4])            COM(2009)
8 final of 21 January 2009.
([5])            Cf.
Directive 2008/50/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May
2008 on ambient air quality and cleaner air for Europe (OJ L 152 of 11.6.2008).
([6])            Cf.
note 3 above.
([7])            COM(2007)
575 final of 10 October 2007.
([8])            SEC(2007)
1278 final of 10 October 2007.
([9])            COM(2013)
18 final of 24 January 2013.
([10])           COM(2011)
169 final of 13 April 2011.
([11])           At
an earlier occasion, the Commission has estimated that switching to shore-side
electricity will lead to an average reduction in CO2 emissions of 50 %,
cf. footnote 2. However, the impact of the measure in question may differ
considerably from this average value as it depends crucially on the carbon
intensity of the relevant market area and the exact time when the additional
electricity demand will occur.
([12])           Council
Directive 1999/32/EC of 26 April 1999 relating to a reduction in the sulphur
content of certain liquid fuels and amending Directive 93/12/EEC (OJ L 121, 11.05.1999,
p. 13–18).
([13])           Cf.
article 1 of the Agreement of 16 May 1952 between the Rhine riparian States and
Belgium on the customs and fiscal treatment of gasoil used as a ship's supply
in the navigation of the Rhine (Bundesgesetzblatt 1953, part II, p. 531).
([14])           Cf.
Article 21(5), third subparagraph, of Directive 2003/96/EC.
([15])           Cf.
European Commission Directorate General Environment, Service Contract Ship
Emissions: Assignment, Abatement and Market-based Instruments, Task 2a –
Shore-Side Electricity, August 2005,
http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/task2_shoreside.pdf. The cost analysis
is carried out for the three ports of Gothenburg (Sweden), Juneau and Long
Beach (USA).
([16])           Commission
Regulation (EU) No 651/2014 of 17 June 2014 declaring certain categories of aid
compatible with the internal market in application of Articles 107 and 108 of
the Treaty (OJ L 187, 26.6.2014, p. 1).
([17])            OJ
L 283, 31.10.2003, p. 51.