CELEX: 62012CN0194
Language: en
Date: 2012-04-26 00:00:00
Title: Case C-194/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 1 de Benidorm (Spain) lodged on 26 April 2012 — Concepción Maestre García v Centros Comerciales CARREFOUR SA

28.7.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 227/7
            
         Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 1 de Benidorm (Spain) lodged on 26 April 2012 — Concepción Maestre García v Centros Comerciales CARREFOUR SA
   (Case C-194/12)
   2012/C 227/11
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Referring court
   
   Juzgado de lo Social No 1 de Benidorm
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Concepción Maestre García
   
      Defendant: Centros Comerciales Carrefour SA
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Does Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time preclude an interpretation of the national legislation that does not allow interruption of a leave period, so that, at a later time, the entire period — or what remains of it — can be taken, where a temporary incapacity takes effect before the period in which leave is taken and there are reasons connected with production or organisation which preclude the leave from being taken in another later period?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Does Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time preclude an interpretation of the national legislation that permits an undertaking unilaterally to schedule a leave period which coincides with a period of temporary incapacity, where the worker has not expressed in advance a preference to take another period and where there is an agreement between the representatives of the undertaking’s workers and the undertaking which so permits?
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Does Article 7(1) of Directive 2003/88 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time preclude an interpretation of the national legislation that permits payment in lieu of leave not taken as a result of temporary incapacity if there are reasons connected with production or organisation which preclude the leave from actually being taken, even though the employment contract has not been terminated?
            
         
      (1)  OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9