CELEX: 62014TN0246
Language: en
Date: 2014-04-17 00:00:00
Title: Case T-246/14: Action brought on 17 April 2014 — Yoworld v OHIM — Nestlé (yogorino)

21.7.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 235/21
            
         Action brought on 17 April 2014 — Yoworld v OHIM — Nestlé (yogorino)
   (Case T-246/14)
   2014/C 235/29
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Yoworld SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Tornato and D. Hazan, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 20 December 2013 given in Case R 115/2013-2;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘yogorino’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 35 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 4 36  536
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: Earlier Community trade mark No 7 2 56  829
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in part
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Upheld the appeal and annulled the contested decision in part
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR