CELEX: 51994PC0115
Language: en
Date: 1994-04-06
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of television camera systems originating in Japan

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
                                      C0M(94) 115 final
                                      Brussels, 06.04.1994
                         Proposal for a
                    COUNCIL REGULATION (EC)
       imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of
          television camera systems originating in Japan.
                 (presented by the Commission)
 ---pagebreak---                         EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
   The Commission, by Regulation (EEC) No.3029/93 of 29 October 1993,
   imposed a provisional anti-dumping duty on imports of television
   camera systems originating in Japan.
   The  Council, by   Regulation   (EC) No.301/94   of   7 February 1994,
   extended this provisional anti-dumping duty by a further period not
   exceeding two months.
   After   the   imposition   of   the   provisional    anti-dumping   duty
   interested   parties   commented   on   the  Commission's    provisional
   findings. The Commission also heard a number of users of television
   camera systems in the Community. The Commission subsequently took
   account, where   warranted,   of  the comments    made by   the  various
   parties and informed them of the essential facts and considerations
   on the basis of which it was intended to propose the imposition of
   definitive anti-dumping duties.
   Three   exporters   have   offered    price  undertakings     which  the
   Commission decided not to accept. The Commission, in accordance
   with Article 12 of the Basic Regulation1^ and after consultation
   of the Advisory Committee, is now proposing to impose definitive
   anti-dumping duties on the imports of television camera systems
   originating in Japan.
1) Regulation (EEC) No.2423/88 of 11 July 1988
 ---pagebreak---                                  Proposal for a
                   COUNCIL REGULATION ( EC) No           /
                                Of
           imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of
              television camera systems originating in Japan.
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European                  Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2423/88 of 11 July 1988 on
protection   against   dumped   or   subsidised   imports  from   countries   not
                                                1
members of the European Economic Community ) thereinafter referred to as
"the Basic Regulation", and in particular Article 12 thereof,
Having   regard  to   the  proposal    from  the   Commission   submitted   after
consultation within the Advisory Committee as provided            for under the
above-mentioned Regulation,
Whereas :
                            A. PROVISIONAL MEASURES
 (1)   The  Commission,   by   Regulation    (EEC)  No  3029/932)    (hereinafter
       referred   to  as   "the   provisional   duty   Regulation")    imposed  a
       provisional   anti-dumping duty on      imports  into the Community of
       television camera systems (hereinafter referred to as "television
       cameras"), originating in Japan.
       The Council, by Regulation       (EC) No 301/94 3 ), extended this duty
       for a period not exceeding two months.
 1)    OJ No L 209, 02.08.1988, p.      1
 2)    OJ No L 271, 30.10.1993, p.      1
 3)    OJ No L   40, 11.02.1993, p. 23
                                        S*-~
 ---pagebreak---                         B. SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURE
(2) Following the imposition of the provisional anti-dumping duty, a
    number of  interested parties made     submissions  to the   Commission
    making known their views on the findings. Those who so requested
    were also granted an opportunity to be heard by the Commission. A
    number of users of television cameras also contacted the Commission
    and made their points of view known in writing as well as orally.
(3) Parties were informed of the essential facts and considerations on
    the basis of which it was intended to recommend the imposition of
    definitive  anti-dumping  duties   and  the definitive   collection   of
    amounts secured by way of provisional duty. They were also granted
    a period within which to make representations       subsequent   to the
    disclosure.
(4) The  oral  and  written   comments   submitted  by  the   parties   were
    considered and, where appropriate, the Commission's findings were
    modified to take account of them.
(5) The investigation overran the normal duration of one year provided
    for  in Article   7  (9)  (a) of   the  Basic  Regulation   due to   the
    complexity of the product and the investigation.
           C. PRODUCT UNDER CONSIDERATION AND LIKE PRODUCT
(6) The main characteristics of the product under consideration         were
    described  in detail   in recitals 7 to 10 of the provisional       duty
    Regulation. The division of the market of electronic cameras using
    three  CCDs   (Charge-Coupled   Device)   into  three   segments,   i.e.
    consumer cameras, professional cameras and television cameras has
    not been disputed by the parties concerned.
 ---pagebreak--- (7) Several exporters, however, argued that the scope of the proceeding
    had been broadened by including so-called professional cameras. The
    Community industry, from its side, argued that the duty should also
    apply to professional     cameras because these professional       cameras
    would be competing with television cameras and would be used by
    broadcast companies.
(8) As outlined in the provisional duty Regulation, it was necessary to
    determine whether the so-called professional cameras which reached
    the technical specifications of the notice of initiation could be
    used  for   broadcast   purposes   by   comparing   in  more  detail    the
    technical specifications and use of these cameras. Account has been
    taken  of   the  following   criteria:    technical  description   of   the
    camera; type of transmission system for the signals; the interface
    for recording facilities; the type and size of CCD ; the type of
    lens; the lifetime of the components; the control possibilities;
    the ease of operation and the possibilities for the users to carry
    out  their   own  maintenance   and   the  use  and  marketing   of   these
    cameras.   No  one  or  several   of   these  criteria  necessarily    gave
    decisive guidance. This investigation revealed that only those so-
    called professional cameras which could be used as forming part of
    a television camera system including most, but not necessarily all,
    of the components indicated in recital 7 of the provisional duty
    Regulation can effectively be qualified as broadcast cameras            and
    should, therefore, be within the scope of any measures. As a result
    of this, a list of professional cameras was drawn up, which are not
    qualified as broadcast cameras and can therefore be exempted from
    the measures. This list is attached to this Regulation as Annex I.
                                    - 3 -
 ---pagebreak---                                   D. DUMPING
(9)  No exporter contested the method of calculation of dumping as set
     out in recitals 11 to 17 of the provisional duty Regulation, apart
     from  a  number   of  mathematical    discrepancies   in   the   after-sales
     discounts,    ordinary   discounts,    selling   costs    and    advertising
     expenses, which have been corrected.
(10) The dumping margins, as finally established and after making the
     adjustments mentioned in recital 9, are as follows:
     Ikegami Tsushinki Co. Ltd            82.9%
     Sony Corporation                     62.6%
     Hitachi Denshi                       52.7%
(11) For  the   producers   which   refused   to  reply  to   the    Commission's
     questionnaires or filed incomplete replies to the questionnaires,
     the margin of dumping was established on the basis of the facts
     available,    in  accordance    with   Article 7 (7) (b)     of   the   basic
     Regulation. Since there was no reason to believe that the producers
     would have sold to the Community at levels higher than the company
     with the highest dumping margin, the calculation of dumping               was
     consequently based on the weighted average margin of a camera head
     with its portable companion camera and a CCU, an OCP, a MSU or MCP
     sold by this company and considered comparable to products sold by
     non-cooperating    exporters. The     result  of  this   calculation    is  a
     margin    of   dumping    of    96.8%   which    should     apply    to   all
     non-cooperating exporters.
                                     - 4 -
 ---pagebreak---                                 E. INJURY
(12) In the provisional duty Regulation the Commission had concluded
     that  the Community television camera      industry suffered   material
     injury in particular through losses of sales, price erosion and
     resulting financial losses with all relevant economic indicators of
     the Community industry being clearly negative.
(13) One  exporter  disputed  the   findings   on  price  undercutting.  The
     exporter claimed that the calculation should not have been based on
     the sales of camera heads only, but should also have included other
     parts of the television camera system, such as the Operational
     Control Panel (OCP), the Camera Control Unit (CCU), the Master Set-
     up Unit (MSU) or the Master Control Panel (MCP).
(14) This argument was accepted and new calculations of undercutting
     were made which now include, apart from the camera head, all of the
     parts mentioned in the previous recital.
(15) Another exporter argued that, for the purpose of calculating price
     undercutting,   too  many   of   the   models   sold  by   one  of  the
     complainants (Thomson Broadcast) were used and that more models of
     the  other  Community   producer    (BTS)  which,   according  to  this
     exporter has the largest market share in the Community, should be
     included.
(16) This argument was accepted and sufficient models of both Community
     producers  have now been    included    in the   calculation which  are
     considered to be more representative.
                                      5 -
 ---pagebreak--- (17)  The exporter also claimed that FT (Frame Transfer) cameras should
      not   be  compared  with   IT   (Interline  Transfer)  and  FIT   (Frame
      Interline Transfer) cameras on the grounds that the technology and
      consumer perception would be different.
(18)  This claim was not accepted. FT technology is indeed technically
      different from both IT or FIT technology because the organisation
      of   the. transfer  of   the   signal  is  different.  This   difference
      however, taken in isolation, is not a reason for concluding that
      the products are not comparable. Amongst the transfer of the signal
      the consumer considers a wide range of characteristics and features
      given the specific application he has in mind for his television
       camera. Different users will rate the features of a television
       camera in a different way in relation to their specific use and
       requirements. It is consequently not possible to limit comparisons
       to the type of transfer of the signal as requested by the exporter.
 (19) All of the above mentioned changes in methodology have affected the
       Commission's provisional findings on price undercutting. The margin
       of undercutting as finally established varied between 21% and 60%
       depending on the exporter concerned.
 (20)  All other findings on injury set out in recitals 18 to 32 of the
       provisional duty Regulation are confirmed, except for      the results
       of   the  calculation  of   price  undercutting   (recital  21  of  the
       provisional duty Regulation) which are replaced by the findings set
       out in recital 19 of this Regulation.
                                      - 6
 ---pagebreak---                      F. CAUSATION OF INJURY BY DUMPING
I.   Effect of dumped imports
(21) In recital 33 of the provisional duty Regulation the Commission
     concluded that the dumped imports were responsible for the injury
     as shown by the fact that the Community producers lost 18% of the
     Community market between 1989 and the investigation period while
     the Japanese suppliers gained 18% of the market in the same period.
     There is consequently a clear cut coincidence between the dumping
     and   the   injury   as  already  explained   in   recital   33   of the
     provisional duty Regulation.
II.  Effect of other factors
(22) A number of users of television cameras wrote to the Commission
     after   the   provisional  duty  was  imposed   and   claimed   that the
     television cameras sold by the Community industry were of a lower
     quality. The users, however, provided no evidence         in support of
     their allegations.
(23) Although   it was found that certain camera       systems   from certain
     producers suited the needs of a particular user better than the
     camera systems from other producers, it did not find a significant
     overall technical superiority of television cameras of any of the
     producers. Further contacts with the users of television camera
     systems confirmed the Commission's provisional findings that the
     products of the Community industry were of a comparable quality,
     were similar in performance and were competing directly with the
     products sold by Japanese producers.
                                    - 7 -
 ---pagebreak--- (24) Consequently no other factors were found, other than the dumped
     imports, which would have been responsible for the injury caused to
     the Community industry. It is therefore          concluded that the dumped
     exports   taken   in isolation    have caused      material    injury  to  the
     Community industry.
                            G. COMMUNITY INTEREST
(25) In   its   provisional    findings,     the    Commission    considered    the
     interests of the Community industry as well as those of end users
      (see recitals 38 to 40 of the provisional duty Regulation) and
     concluded that it was in the interest of the Community to impose a
     provisional    anti-dumping   duty    to   counteract    the   effect  of  the
     unfair   pricing   behaviour   on   the   Community     industry   during  the
     investigation.
(26) After    the   imposition   of   the     provisional     anti-dumping    duty,
     representations from a number of users of television camera systems
     were received which alleged that the measures would not be in their
     interest    because   the  high    level    of   the   duty   would   increase
     drastically the prices of the imported cameras. Some users, which
     had   already   previously   decided     to  buy    Japanese    cameras,  also
     pointed out that it would be almost impossible for them to switch
     immediately    from  a   Japanese    supplier    to   a   Community   supplier
     because of the incompatibility of the television camera systems
     from the various suppliers.
                                     - 8
 ---pagebreak--- (27) It is entirely      matter for the users to decide whether or not to
     switch from imported to Community products. If this happens it will
     merely be    a consequence      of users     fully   choosing     the  Community
     product   once the     imported product      loses    its unfair     competitive
     advantage. In any case, there are already a large number of users
     which   use    television    cameras    from    various    suppliers,    despite
     compatibility     limitations. Moreover, the purpose of             anti-dumping
     measures   is    not  necessarily     to  cause    users    to  switch   from   a
     Japanese supplier to a Community supplier but merely to eliminate
     unfair trade practices.
(28) It  should    be   borne   in  mind    that   the   purpose    of   anti-dumping
     measures    is   to  remedy   the   injurious     effect    of  unfair   trading
     practices and to re-establish a fair competitive situation which,
     as such, is in the general interest of the Community. It should
     also be pointed out that the users have no right to continue to
     take advantage of the effect of unfair trade practices in the form
     of very low prices.
(29) As outlined in recital 40 of the provisional duty Regulation, the
     investigation revealed that prices of television cameras                  in the
     Community had declined over the last four years to such an extent
     that all Japanese as well as Community suppliers were selling at a
     loss.   If this situation       is not halted       and   if profitable    price
     levels are not restored, the situation of the Community television
     camera industry will further deteriorate with a strong possibility
     of shutdown with the consequent loss of a high-tech industry and
     the   disadvantageous     effects    for   users   of   a   reduced   number   of
     competitors.
(30) It is consequently concluded that it is in the Community interest
     to   adopt    definitive     anti-dumping      measures     to   eliminate    the
     injurious effects of the dumped imports.
                                       - 9
 ---pagebreak---                                H. UNDERTAKINGS
(31) The following three exporters have offered price undertakings in
     accordance with Article 10 (3) of the Basic Regulation:
     Ikegami Tsushinki Co. Ltd
     Sony Corporation
     Hitachi Denshi
(32) The    Commission,     after    consultation,     considered    that   the
     undertakings    were  not   acceptable   in particular    because  of  the
     possibilities to circumvent the minimum prices of the undertaking
     by means which would be particularly difficult to detect in this
     case given the peculiarities of the product and the market.
                                    I. DUTY
(33) The measures     should consequently take the form of a definitive
     anti-dumping duty.
(34) As regards the level of duty provisionally imposed, the Commission
     determined,    that   the   increase   to   the  export   prices  of  each
     individual    exporter,    which   would   be   required   to  permit  the
     Community industry a reasonable return on sales of its television
     cameras exceeded the dumping margins as established. Consequently,
     the provisional anti-dumping duty corresponded          to the individual
     dumping margins of each exporter as established in recital 16 and
     17 of the provisional duty Regulation in accordance with Article 13
      (3) of the Basic Regulation.
                                       10 -
 ---pagebreak--- (35) Some   exporters    argued   that   the  Commission     should   not   have
     restricted its calculation of the level of injury to the camera
     heads only but should also have included other components of the
     television camera system.
(36) This argument has already been accepted in recitals 13 to 19 of
     this  Regulation    for  the   purpose  of   the  calculation    of   price
     undercutting and is therefore also accepted for the calculation of
     the price increase required to allow the Community industry to make
     a reasonable profit. Thus included in the calculation were not only
     the camera heads but also the CCU's, the OCP's, the MSU's or            the
     MCP's. This new calculation revealed the following price increases
     necessary to remove the injury caused by dumping, expressed as a
     percentage of the CIF import prices of the Japanese             television
     cameras :
     Ikegami Tsushinki Co. Ltd.:          98.9%
     Sony Corporation:                    81.3%
     Hitachi Denshi Ltd:                  89.2%
(37) For  the   producers   which   refused  to  reply   to   the  Commission's
     questionnaires or filed incomplete replies to the questionnaires
     the level of price increase necessary to eliminate the injury was
     established on the basis of the facts available, in accordance with
     Article   7  (7)  (b) of the Basic Regulation. Since there was no
     reason   to  believe   that   the  producers   would   have  sold   to  the
     Community   at   levels  higher   than  the   company   with  the   highest
     dumping margin the Commission consequently based its calculation of
     the level of injury on the weighted average margin of a comparable
     camera head with its portable companion camera and a CCU, an OCP, a
     MSU or MCP sold by this company. This margin amounted to 108.3%.
                                       11
 ---pagebreak--- (38)  Since the level of injury thus established exceeds the margins of
      dumping as finally established the duties are based on the margins
      of dumping.
(39)  Representations from Member States and from the Community industry
      indicatd that, given the particular conditions of the television
      camera market, the risk that the anti-dumping duty on television
      camera systems might be evaded and thus rendered ineffective, could
      be high.
(40)  The Council   is of the opinion that such a possibility        in this
      particular case requires special attention.      It is noted that the
      Commission   will  keep  the  situation  of  the  market  under   close
      examination with a view to prevent any undermining of the remedial
      effect of this anti-dumping duty.
                            J. RETROACTIVE DUTIES
(41)  The Community producers requested the imposition of         retroactive
      anti-dumping duties on the grounds that importers were aware that
      the   exporters  were practising   dumping  and  that  there  would  be
      material injury caused by sporadic dumping in the form of massive
       imports of television cameras in a relatively short period prior to
       the imposition of the provisional anti-dumping duty.
 (42)  In the absence of sporadic dumping, as defined in Article 13 (4) of
       the Basic Regulation there were no grounds to impose retroactive
       anti-dumping duties in this case. The Council consequently decided
       not to impose retroactive anti-dumping duties on television camera
       systems originating in Japan.
                                      12
 ---pagebreak---                     K. COLLECTION OF PROVISIONAL DUTIES
(43)  In the view of the importance of the dumping margins found and the
      seriousness of the injury caused to the Community producers, the
      Council considers it necessary that the amounts secured by way of
      provisional anti-dumping duties should be collected, either in full
      or to a maximum of the duty definitively imposed in those cases
      where the definitive duty is less than the provisional duty. The
      duty should be definitively collected for all models of television
      camera systems originating in Japan not included in the listing
      attached to this Regulation as Annex I.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
                                  Article 1
1.    A definitive anti-dumping duty is hereby imposed on imports of
      television camera systems falling within CN codes 8525 30 99 (Taric
      Code:   8525 30 99*10),   8537 10 91   (Taric   Code: 8537 10 91*91),
      8537 10 99   (Taric Code: 8537 10 99*91), 8529 90 98     (Taric Code:
      8529 90 98*98), 8543 80 80 (Taric Code: 8543 80 80*97), 8528 10 31
       (Taric Code: 8528 10 31*10), 8528 10 41 (Taric Code: 8528 10 41*10)
      and 8528 10 49    (Taric Code: 8528 10 49*10) originating in Japan.
2.    Television camera systems may consist of a combination of the
      following parts, imported either together or separately:
       (a)   a camera head with three sensors       (12 mm or more charge-
             coupled device pick-up devices) with more than 400 000 pixels
             each, which can be connected to a rear adapter, and having a
             specification of the signal-to-noise ratio of 55 dB or more
             at normal gain; either in one piece, with the camera head and
             the adapter in one housing, or separate,-
                                    - 13
 ---pagebreak--- (b)   a view finder (diagonal, of 38 mm or more);
(c)   a base station or     camera control unit (CCU) connected to the
      camera by a cable;
d)    an operational control panel        (OCP) for camera control       (i.e.
      for   colour  adjustment,     lens   opening   or   iris)    of   single
      cameras ;
e)    a master control panel (MCP) or master set-up unit (MSU) with
      selected    camera   indication,      for  the    overview     and   for
      adjustment of several remote cameras.
The duty does not apply to:
a)    lenses;
b)    video tape recorders;
 (c)  camera-heads     with    the    recording    unit     in    the    same,
      inseparable, housing;
d)    professional    cameras   which    cannot  be   used    for   broadcast
      purposes.
 (e)  professional cameras listed in Annex I.
       (Taric additional code: 8786).
When the television camera system is imported with the lens                the
free-at-Community-frontier value used in applying the anti-dumping
duty shall be that of the television camera systems without                the
lens. If this value is not specified on the invoice the importer
shall declare the value of the lens at the time of release for free
circulation and shall submit       appropriate evidence and information
on that occasion.
                               - 14
 ---pagebreak--- 5.    The rate of the definitive anti-dumping duty shall be 96.8% of the
      net,   free-at-Community      frontier     price,    before  duty     (Taric
      additional  code   : 8744) except      for the following    companies    for
      which the rate shall be as follows:
      Ikegami Tsushinki Co. Ltd.:           82.9% Taric additional code: 8741
      Sony Corporation :                    62.6% Taric additional code: 8742
      Hitachi Denshi Ltd. :                 52.7% Taric additional code: 8743
6.    The provisions in force concerning customs duties shall apply.
                                   Article 2
The amounts secured by way of provisional anti-dumping duty imposed by
Commission Regulation    (EEC) No 3029/93 on the products not           listed in
Annex I attached to this Regulation shall be definitively collected at
the rates of the duty definitively imposed, except for Hitachi Denshi Ltd
for which the provisional anti-dumping duty of 49.9% shall be collected.
                                   Article 3
This  Regulation   shall    enter   into   force   on   the  day  following    its
publication in the Official    Journal   of the European     Communities.
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable
in all Member States.
Done at Brussels,                               For the Council
                                       - 15
 ---pagebreak---                                                                        ANNEX I
        LIST OF PROFESSIONAL CAMERA SYSTEMS NOT QUALIFIED AS BROADCAST CAMERA SYSTEMS WHICH
                                                     ARE EXEMPTED FROM THE MEASURES
  COMPANY                CAMERA             VIEWFINDER              CAMERA       OPERATIONAL MASTER         CAMERA
      NAME                HEADS                                CONTROL UNIT CONTROL UNIT CONTROL UNIT*    ADAPTORS
SONY                 DXC-M7PK             DXF-3000CE           CCU-M3P           RM-M7G                  CA-325P
                     DXC-M7P               DXF-325CE           CCU-M5P                                   CA-325AP
                     DXC-M7PH             DXF-501CE            CCU-M7P                                   CA-325B
                     DXC-M7PK/1            DXF-M3CE                                                      CA-327P
                     DXC-M7P/1             DXF-M7CE                                                  /.. CA-537P
                     DXC-M7PH/1           DXF-40CE                                                       CA-511
                     DXC-327PK             DXF-40ACE                                                     CA-512P
                     DXC-327PL             DXF-50CE                                                      CA-51 3
                     DXC-327PH
                     DXC-327APK
                     DXC-327APL
                     DXC-327AH
                     DXC-537PK
                     DXC-537PL
                     DXC-537PH
                     DXC-537APK
                     DXC-537APL
                     DXC-537APH
                     EVW-537PK
                     EVW-327PK
IKEGAMI               HC-340               VF1 5-21/22          MA-200/230       RCU-240                 CA-340
                     HC-300                VF-4523                                                       CA-300
                      HC-230                                                                             CA-230
                      HC-240
                      HC-210
HITACHI               SK-H5                GM-5 (A)             RU--C1 (B)
                      SK-H501              GM-5-R2 (A)          RU-C1 (D)
                      DK-7700              GM-5-R2              RU-C1
                      DK-7700SX            GM-50                RU-C1-S5
                      HV-C10                                    RU-C10 (B)
                      HV-C11                                    RU-C10 (C)
                      HV-C10F                                   RC-C1
                      Z-ONE (L)                                 RC-C10
                      Z-ONE (H)                                 RU-C10
                      Z-ONE                                      RU-Z1 (B)
                      Z-ONE A (L)                                RU-Z1 (C)
                      Z-ONE A (H)                                RU-Z1
                      Z-ONE A (F)                                RC-C11
                      Z-ONE A
                      Z-ONE B (L)
                      Z-ONE B (H)
                      Z-ONE B (F)
                      Z-ONE B
                      Z-ONE B (M)
                      Z-ONE B (R)
                      FP-C10 (B)
                      FP-C10 (C)
                      FP-C10 (D)
                      FP-C10 (G)
                      FP-C10 (L)
                      FP-C10 (R)
  i also called Master Setup Unit (MSU) or. Master Control Panel (MCP)
                                                                           - 1 ^
 ---pagebreak---                                                                       ANNEX I
         LIST OF PROFESSIONAL CAMERA SYSTEMS NOT QUALIFIED AS BROADCAST CAMERA SYSTEMS WHICH
                                                    ARE EXEMPTED FROM THE MEASURES
1 COMPANY                CAMERA             VIEWFINDER             CAMERA    OPERATIONAL     MASTER       CAMERA
1      NAME                HEADS                                CONTROL UNIT CONTROL UNIT CONTROL UNIT*  ADAPTORS
ÎHITACHI             FP-C10 (S)
                     FP-C10 (V)
                     FP-C 10(F)
                     FP-C10
                     FP-C 10 A
                     FP-C10 A (A)
                     FP-C10 A (B)
                     FP-C10 A (C)
                     FP-C10 A (D)
                     FP-C10 A (F)
                     FP-C10 A (G)
                     FP-C10 A (H)
                     FP-C 10 A (L)
                     FP-C10 A (R)
                     FP-C 10 A (S)
                     FP-C 10 A (T)
                     FP-C10 A (V)
                     FP-C 10 A (W)
                     Z-ONE C (M)
                     Z-ONE C (R)
                     Z-ONE C (F)
                     Z-ONE C
 WIATSUSHITA WV-F700                      WV-VF65BE            WV-RC700/B                               WV-AD700SE
                     WV-F700A             WV-VF40E             WV-RC700/G                               WV-AD700ASE
                     WV-F700SHE           WV-VF65BE            WV-RC700A/B                              WV-AD700ME
                     WV-F700ASHE          WV-VF39E             WV-RC700A/G                              WV-AD250E
                     WV-F700BHE           WV-VF65BE            WV-RC36/B                                WV-AD500E*
                     WV-F700ABHE          WV-VF40E             WV-RC36/G
                     WV-F700MHE           WV-VF65BE1           WV-RC37/B
                     WV-F350              WV-VF40E*            WV-RC37/G
                     WV-F350HE                                 WV-CB700E
                     WV-F350E                                  WV-CB700AE
                     WV-F350AE                                 WV-CB700E*
                     WV-F350DE                                 WV-CB700AE*
                     WV-F350ADE                                WV-RC700/B*
                     WV-F500HE*                                 WV-RC700/G*
                                                                WV-RC700A/B*
                                                                WV-RC700A/G
VJVC                  KY-35E               VF-P315E             RM-P350EG                               KA-35E
                      KY-27ECH             VF-P550E             RM-P200EG                               KA-B35U
                      KY-19ECH             VF-P10E              RM-P300EG                               KA-M35U
                      KY-17FITECH          VP-P115E             RM-LP80E                                KA-P35U
                      KY-17BECH            VF-P400E             RM-LP821E                               KA-27E
                      KY-F30FITE           VP-P550BE            RM-LP35U                                KA-20E
                      KY-F30BE                                  RM-LP37U                                KA-P27U
                                                                                                        KA-P20U
                                                                                                        KA-B27E
                                                                                                        KA-B20E
                                                                                                        KA-M20E
                                                                                                        KA-M27E
 *) also called Master Setup Unit (MSU) or Master Control Panel (MCP)
                                                                         -*r
 ---pagebreak---                                                                     ISSN 0254-1475
                                                              COM (94) 115 final
                                                      DOCUMENTS
EN                                                                         i l 02
                                Catalogue number : CB-CO-94-121-EN-C
                                                             ISBN 92-77-67045-2
Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
1^2985 Luxembourg
                                        n