CELEX: C2002/131/45
Language: en
Date: 2002-06-01 00:00:00
Title: Case T-97/02: Action brought on 2 April 2002 by Prodromos Mavridis against the Commission of the European Communities

C 131/24              EN                     Official Journal of the European Communities                                      1.6.2002
The applicant claims that the Court should:                             —     order the Commission to pay the costs.
—     annul the Commission’s decision establishing the calcu-
      lation of the pension rights acquired by the applicant
      prior to his entry into service and transferred to the            Pleas in law and main arguments
      Community pension scheme pursuant to Article 11(2) of
      Annex VIII of the Staff Regulations;
                                                                        In support of his claim, the applicant pleads infringement of
                                                                        Article 45 of the Staff Regulations and of the principles of
—     order the Commission to pay the costs.
                                                                        equal treatment and career progression. According to the
                                                                        applicant, his merits were not taken fully into consideration in
                                                                        the context of the 2001 promotions procedure.
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of his claim, the applicant pleads non-compliance
with the obligation to provide a statement of reasons and
infringement of Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff
Regulations and of the general provisions for the implemen-             Action brought on 11 April 2002 by Bolloré S.A. against
tation thereof, as well as breach of the principle of equal                      Commission of the European Communities
treatment. According to the applicant, the calculation should
have been carried out on the basis of his situation at the time                                 (Case T-109/02)
of entering the service of the Communities as a member of the
temporary staff, and not on the basis of his situation at the
time of his being appointed as an established official, some                                    (2002/C 131/46)
nine years later.
                                                                                           (Language of the case: French)
                                                                        An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
                                                                        ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
                                                                        European Communities on 11 April 2002 by Bolloré S.A.,
                                                                        established in Puteaux (France), represented by Robert Saint-
Action brought on 2 April 2002 by Prodromos Mavridis                    Esteben and Hugues Calvet, lawyers, with an address for service
  against the Commission of the European Communities                    in Luxembourg.
                         (Case T-97/02)                                 The applicant claims that the Court should:
                        (2002/C 131/45)                                 —     Annul Articles 1, 2 and 3 of the Commission decision of
                                                                              20 December 2001, reference COMP/E-1/36212 —
                                                                              Carbonless paper, relating to a proceeding pursuant to
                  (Language of the case: French)                              Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA
                                                                              Agreement, in so far as they refer to Bolloré;
                                                                        —     In the alternative, reduce very substantially the amount
                                                                              of the fine imposed on Bolloré by Article 3 of the
An action against the Commission of the European Communi-                     decision;
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
European Communities on 2 April 2002 by Prodromos
                                                                        —     Order the Commission to pay the costs.
Mavridis, residing in Brussels, represented by Jean-Noël Louis,
lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg.
                                                                        Pleas in law and main arguments
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—     annul the Commission’s decision not to promote the                The applicant contests the Commission’s decision finding that
      applicant to grade A 5 in the context of the 2001                 it took part in an agreement contrary to Article 81(1) of the
      promotions procedure;                                             EC Treaty and Article 53(1) of the EEA Agreement.