CELEX: 62016CN0265
Language: en
Date: 2016-05-12 00:00:00
Title: Case C-265/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Torino (Italy) lodged on 12 May 2016 — VCAST Limited v R.T.I. SpA

25.7.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 270/30
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Torino (Italy) lodged on 12 May 2016 — VCAST Limited v R.T.I. SpA
   (Case C-265/16)
   (2016/C 270/34)
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Referring court
   
   Tribunale ordinario di Torino
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: VCAST Limited
   
      Defendant: R.T.I. SpA
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Are national rules prohibiting a commercial undertaking from providing private individuals with so-called cloud computing services for the remote video recording of private copies of works protected by copyright, by means of that commercial undertaking’s active involvement in the recording, without the rightholder’s consent, compatible with EU law, in particular with Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, (1) (as well as Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market (2) and the founding Treaty)?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Are national rules which allow a commercial undertaking to provide private individuals with so-called cloud computing services for the remote video recording of private copies of works protected by copyright, even where the active involvement of that commercial undertaking in the recording is entailed, and even without the rightholder’s consent, against a flat-rate compensation in favour of the rightholder, in essence subjecting the services to a compulsory licensing system, compatible with EU law, in particular with Article 5(2)(b) of Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (as well as Directive 2000/31/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2000 on certain legal aspects of information society services, in particular electronic commerce, in the Internal Market and the founding Treaty)?
            
         
      (1)  OJ 2001 L 167, p. 10.
   
      (2)  ‘Directive on electronic commerce’, OJ 2000 L 178, p. 1.