CELEX: 62010TA0356
Language: en
Date: 2011-09-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-356/10: Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Nike International v OHIM — Deichmann (VICTORY RED) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for registration of the Community word mark VICTORY RED — Earlier international and national word marks Victory — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

12.11.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 331/19
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 28 September 2011 — Nike International v OHIM — Deichmann (VICTORY RED)
   (Case T-356/10) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the Community word mark VICTORY RED - Earlier international and national word marks Victory - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2011/C 331/36
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Nike International Ltd (Beaverton, Oregon, United States) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Deichmann SE (Essen, Germany)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 May 2010 (Case R 1309/2009-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Deichmann SE and Nike International Ltd.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The General Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Nike International Ltd to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.