CELEX: 62011FA0010
Language: en
Date: 2012-11-20 00:00:00
Title: Case F-10/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 November 2012 — Ghiba v Commission (Civil service — Internal competition — Non-admission to participate in a competition — Eligibility conditions — Concept of services attached to the Commission)

16.2.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 46/28
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 20 November 2012 — Ghiba v Commission
   (Case F-10/11) (1)
   
   (Civil service - Internal competition - Non-admission to participate in a competition - Eligibility conditions - Concept of services attached to the Commission)
   2013/C 46/52
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Dorina Maria Ghiba (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially B. Eggers and P. Pecho, acting as Agents, then B. Eggers, acting as Agent)
   
      Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and J. Herrmann, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Civil service — Annulment of the decision of the selection board for competition COM/INT/EU2/AST3 to reject the applicant’s candidature on the ground that it did not meet the eligibility requirements stipulated in the notice of competition.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Mrs Ghiba to bear her own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 95, 26.3.2011, p. 14.