CELEX: 62011FA0125
Language: en
Date: 2013-03-13 00:00:00
Title: Case F-125/11: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2013 — Mendes v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Non-admission to the assessment tests — Administration’s duty to interpret complaints in a spirit of openness — Amendment to the vacancy notice after holding the admission tests — Principle of legitimate expectations — Legal certainty)

27.4.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 123/28
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 13 March 2013 — Mendes v Commission
   (Case F-125/11) (1)
   
   (Civil service - Open competition - Non-admission to the assessment tests - Administration’s duty to interpret complaints in a spirit of openness - Amendment to the vacancy notice after holding the admission tests - Principle of legitimate expectations - Legal certainty)
   2013/C 123/49
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Isabel Mendes (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rogrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, acting as Agent)
   
      Re:
   
   Application to annul the decision not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests in competition EPSO/AST/111/10
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               annuls the decision of the selection board of open competition EPSO/AST/111/10 of 7 April 2011 not to admit the applicant to the assessment tests;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               orders the European Commission to pay EUR 2 000 to the applicant;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               dismisses the application as to the remainder;
            
         
               4.
            
            
               orders each party to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012, p. 21.