CELEX: 62008CB0081
Language: en
Date: 2008-11-13 00:00:00
Title: Case C-81/08 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2008 — Miguel Cabrera Sánchez v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Industrias Cárnicas Valle SA (Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Likelihood of confusion — Mixed word and figurative mark — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier mark)

21.3.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 69/14
            
         Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 November 2008 — Miguel Cabrera Sánchez v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) and Industrias Cárnicas Valle SA
   (Case C-81/08 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Likelihood of confusion - Mixed word and figurative mark - Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier mark)
   (2009/C 69/24)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   Parties
   
      Appellant: Miguel Cabrera Sánchez (represented by: J. Calderón Chavero, abogado)
   
      Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo, Agent) and Industrias Cárnicas Valle SA
   Re:
   Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 13 December 2007 in Case T-242/06 Cabrera Sánchez v OHIM and Industrias Cárnicas Valle, by which the Court dismissed the action against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2006 (Case R 790/2005-01), relating to opposition proceedings between Miguel Cabrera Sánchez and Industrias Cárnicas Valle SA.
   Operative part of the order
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Cabrera Sánchez shall pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 128, 24.5.2008.