CELEX: C2005/229/27
Language: en
Date: 2005-09-17 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 July 2005 in Case T-40/03: Julián Murúa Entrena v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Application for figurative Community trade mark including the verbal element ‘Julián Murúa Entrena’ — Opposition by the proprietor of the Spanish and international work mark MURÚA — Refusal to register — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Surname)

17.9.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 229/14
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 13 July 2005
   in Case T-40/03: Julián Murúa Entrena v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Application for figurative Community trade mark including the verbal element ‘Julián Murúa Entrena’ - Opposition by the proprietor of the Spanish and international work mark MURÚA - Refusal to register - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Surname)
   (2005/C 229/27)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   In Case T-40/03: Julián Murúa Entrena, residing in Elciego (Spain), represented by I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: I. de Medrano Caballero and G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance, being Bodegas Murúa SA — action against the Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2002 (Case R 599/1999-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Bodegas Murúa SA and Julián Murúa Entrena — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 July 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 101 of 26.4.2003.