CELEX: 62013TN0213
Language: en
Date: 2013-04-08 00:00:00
Title: Case T-213/13: Action brought on 8 April 2013 — Square v OHIM — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne (SQUARE)

20.7.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 207/36
            
         Action brought on 8 April 2013 — Square v OHIM — Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne (SQUARE)
   (Case T-213/13)
   2013/C 207/60
   Language in which the application was lodged: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Square, Inc. (San Francisco, United States) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne (Serres-Castet, France)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 31 January 2013 in Case R 775/2012-1;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs of the procedure.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: Square, Inc.
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The international registration designating the European Union of the word mark SQUARE for goods and services in Classes 9, 35 and 38 — international trade mark designating the European Union No W 1 032 395
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Caisse régionale de crédit agricole mutuel Pyrénées Gascogne
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: National word mark SQUARE-énergie for goods and services in Classes 31, 35, 36, 38, 41, 42 and 44
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009