CELEX: 62010CN0052
Language: en
Date: 2010-02-01 00:00:00
Title: Case C-52/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 1 February 2010 — Eleftheri Tileorasi A.E. Alter Channel and Konstantinos Giannikos v Ipourgos Tipou kai Meson Mazikis Enimerosis and Ethniko Simvoulio Radiotileorasis

17.4.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 100/25
            
         Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Greece) lodged on 1 February 2010 — Eleftheri Tileorasi A.E. ‘Alter Channel’ and Konstantinos Giannikos v Ipourgos Tipou kai Meson Mazikis Enimerosis and Ethniko Simvoulio Radiotileorasis
   (Case C-52/10)
   2010/C 100/37
   Language of the case: Greek
   
      Referring court
   
   Simvoulio tis Epikratias
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicants: Eleftheri Tileorasi A.E. ‘Alter Channel’ and Konstantinos Giannikos
   
      Defendants: Ipourgos Tipou kai Meson Mazikis Enimerosis (Minister for the Press and the Mass Media) and Ethniko Simvoulio Radiotileorasis (National Council for Radio and Television)
   
      Question referred
   
   Is Article 1(d) of Council Directive 89/552/EEC on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the pursuit of television broadcasting activities (OJ 1989 L 298, p. 23), as amended by Article 1(c) of Directive 97/36/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 1997 L 202, p. 60), to be interpreted as meaning that, in the context of ‘surreptitious advertising’, the provision of payment or of consideration of another kind is a necessary defining element of the intention to advertise?