CELEX: 62018TN0402
Language: en
Date: 2018-07-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-402/18: Action brought on 3 July 2018 — Aquino and Others v Parliament

8.10.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 364/14
            
         
      Action brought on 3 July 2018 — Aquino and Others v Parliament
      (Case T-402/18)
      (2018/C 364/14)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicants: Roberto Aquino (Brussels, Belgium) and 30 other applicants (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Parliament
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicants claim that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  declare the present action admissible and well founded;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  consequently:
                  
                              —
                           
                           
                              annul the decision of 2 July 2018 requisitioning interpreters for 3 July 2018 as well as future decisions requisitioning interpreters for 4, 5, 10 and 11 July 2018;
                           
                        
                              —
                           
                           
                              order the defendant to pay compensation for the non-material harm suffered, assessed on equitable principles at EUR 1 000 per applicant;
                           
                        
                              —
                           
                           
                              order the defendant to pay all of the costs.
                           
                        
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicants rely on three pleas in law which are essentially identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-401/18, SFIE-PE v Parliament.