CELEX: 62014FA0011
Language: en
Date: 2015-05-18 00:00:00
Title: Case F-11/14: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Dupré v EEAS (Civil service — Staff of the EEAS — Member of the temporary staff — Article 98 of the Staff Regulations — Article 2(e) of the CEOS — Contract of employment — Grading — Plea of illegality of the vacancy notice — Post at grade AD 5 open to staff from national diplomatic services and to officials of grades AD 5 to AD 14 — Principle of correspondence between the grade and the post — Judgment by default)

29.6.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 213/42
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 18 May 2015 — Dupré v EEAS
   (Case F-11/14) (1)
   
   ((Civil service - Staff of the EEAS - Member of the temporary staff - Article 98 of the Staff Regulations - Article 2(e) of the CEOS - Contract of employment - Grading - Plea of illegality of the vacancy notice - Post at grade AD 5 open to staff from national diplomatic services and to officials of grades AD 5 to AD 14 - Principle of correspondence between the grade and the post - Judgment by default))
   (2015/C 213/69)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Bruno Dupré (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Tymen, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application to annul the applicant’s contract in so far as it categorises him at grade AD 5 and to compensate him for the harm allegedly suffered.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1)
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2)
            
            
               Orders each party to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 102 of 7/4/2014, p. 45.