CELEX: 62017CN0135
Language: en
Date: 2017-03-15 00:00:00
Title: Case C-135/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 March 2017 — X-GmbH v Finanzamt Stuttgart — Körperschaften

10.7.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 221/4
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 15 March 2017 — X-GmbH v Finanzamt Stuttgart — Körperschaften
   (Case C-135/17)
   (2017/C 221/05)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Referring court
   
   Bundesfinanzhof
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: X-GmbH
   
      Defendant: Finanzamt Stuttgart — Körperschaften
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Is Article 57(1) EC (now Article 64(1) TFEU) to be interpreted as meaning that a restriction in a Member State which existed on 31 December 1993 in respect of the movement of capital to and from third countries involving direct investments is not affected by Article 56 EC (now Article 63 TFEU) even if the national law in force at the relevant date restricting the movement of capital to and from third countries essentially applied only to direct investments but was extended after that date to cover also investment holdings in foreign companies below the shareholding threshold of 10 %?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               If the first question is to be answered in the affirmative: Is Article 57(1) EC to be interpreted as meaning that a national-law restriction in respect of the movement of capital to or from third countries involving direct investments is to be regarded as applicable on the relevant date of 31 December 1993, if later national law substantially corresponding to the restriction in force at the relevant date enters into force, the restriction existing at the relevant date being nevertheless substantially amended for a short time by legislation which formally entered into force but was in practice never applied due to the fact that it was replaced by the legislation at present in force before it could be applied to a specific case for the first time?
            
         
               3.
            
            
               If either of the first two questions is to be answered in the negative: Does Article 56 EC preclude legislation of a Member State under which the basis of assessment to tax of a taxable person resident in that Member State, which holds at least 1 % of the shares in a company established in another State (in the present case, Switzerland), includes positive income earned by that company derived from capital investments pro rata, in the amount of the shareholding, where such income is taxed at a lower rate than in the Member State?