CELEX: 62017TB0817
Language: en
Date: 2019-02-08 00:00:00
Title: Case T-817/17: Order of the General Court of 8 February 2019 — Schokker v EASA (Civil service — Contract staff — AESA - Recruitment — Selection procedure - Inclusion of the applicant on the reserve list — Withdrawal of the offer of employment made to the applicant — Liability — No unlawful conduct by the EASA — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

8.4.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 131/47
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 8 February 2019 — Schokker v EASA
      (Case T-817/17) (1)
      
      (Civil service - Contract staff - AESA - Recruitment - Selection procedure - Inclusion of the applicant on the reserve list - Withdrawal of the offer of employment made to the applicant - Liability - No unlawful conduct by the EASA - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
      (2019/C 131/54)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Boudewijn Schokker (Hoofddorp, Netherlands) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency (represented by: S. Rostren and F. Pavesi, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 270 TFUE for compensation for damage which the applicant claims to have suffered by reason of the blameworthy conduct of the EASA during the selection procedure for the recruitment of a member of the contract agent.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     The action is dismissed.
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     Mr Boudewijn Schokker is ordered to pay the costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 63, 19.2.2018.