CELEX: C2004/228/89
Language: en
Date: 2004-09-11 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 June 2004 in Case T-267/02, Rewe-Zentral AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Partial refusal of registration — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)

11.9.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 228/39
            
         
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 14 June 2004
   in Case T-267/02, Rewe-Zentral AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Partial refusal of registration - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
   (2004/C 228/89)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case T-267/02, REWE-ZENTRAL AG, established in Cologne (Germany), represented by H. Eichmann, G. Barth, U. Blumenröder, C. Niklas-Falter, M. Kinkeldey, K. Brandt, A. Franke, U. Stephani, B. Allekotte, E. Pfrang, K. Lochner and B. Ertle, lawyers, against the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: J. Weberndorfer and G. Schneider), the intervener before the Court of First Instance being Fritidsresor AB, established in Stockholm, represented by U. Sander, lawyer, an action brought against the decision of 1 July 2002 by OHIM's First Board of Appeal (case R 888/2000-1) as regards the registration of the sign Atlasreisen as a Community mark, the Court (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and I. Pelikánová, Judges; Registrar: H. Jung, made an order on 14 June 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:
   
               1.
            
            
               There is no further need to adjudicate on the matter.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Each party is to pay its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.