CELEX: 62016CN0360
Language: en
Date: 2016-06-29 00:00:00
Title: Case C-360/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 29 June 2016 — Federal Republic of Germany v Aziz Hasan

19.9.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 343/30
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 29 June 2016 — Federal Republic of Germany v Aziz Hasan
   (Case C-360/16)
   (2016/C 343/42)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Referring court
   
   Bundesverwaltungsgericht
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Appellant: Federal Republic of Germany
   
      Respondent: Aziz Hasan
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               In a case where a third-country national, after lodging a second asylum application in another Member State (here, Germany), was transferred to the Member State having original responsibility for the first asylum application (here, Italy) because of a court’s rejection of his application for suspension of the transfer decision under Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 (‘the Dublin III Regulation’) and then immediately returned illegally to the second Member State (here, Germany):
               
                           a)
                        
                        
                           According to the principles of the Dublin III Regulation, is the factual situation that is relevant for a court’s review of a transfer decision the situation that pertained at the time of the transfer, because responsibility was definitively determined by transfer within the time limit and therefore the rules in the Dublin III Regulation concerning responsibility are no longer applicable to further developments, or is it necessary to take into consideration subsequent developments in the circumstances relevant to responsibility in general, e.g. expiry of time limits for a take back or (renewed) transfer?
                        
                     
                           b)
                        
                        
                           Following determination of responsibility on the basis of the transfer decision, can further transfers be made to the Member State having original responsibility, and does that Member State remain obligated to take charge of the third-country national?
                        
                     
         
               2.
            
            
               If responsibility is not definitively determined by the transfer: Which of the provisions listed below applies in such a case to a person described in Article 18(1)(b), (c), or (d) of the Dublin III Regulation on account of an ongoing appeal against the already enforced transfer decision:
               
                           a)
                        
                        
                           Article 23 of the Dublin III Regulation (analogously), with the result that, in the case of a new take back request that is not submitted within the time limit, responsibility can shift in accordance with Article 23(2) and (3) of the Dublin III Regulation, or
                        
                     
                           b)
                        
                        
                           Article 24 of the Dublin III Regulation (analogously), or
                        
                     
                           c)
                        
                        
                           neither of the provisions set forth in a) and b)?
                        
                     
         
               3.
            
            
               In the event that neither Article 23 nor Article 24 applies (analogously) to such a person (question 2(c)): Can further transfers be made to the Member State having original responsibility (here, Italy) on the basis of the challenged transfer decision until conclusion of the appeal against such decision, and does that Member State remain obligated to take charge of the third-country national, irrespective of whether further take back requests have been submitted without complying with the time limits in Article 23(3) or Article 24(2) of the Dublin III Regulation and irrespective of the transfer time limits in Article 29(1) and (2) of the Dublin III Regulation?
            
         
               4.
            
            
               In the event that Article 23 of the Dublin III Regulation applies (analogously) to such a person (question 2(a)): Is the new take back request tied (analogously) to a new time limit under Article 23(2) of the Dublin III Regulation? If so: Does this new time limit start to run when the responsible authority learns of re-entry, or does another event determine its commencement?
            
         
               5.
            
            
               In the event that Article 24 of the Dublin III Regulation applies (analogously) to such a person (question 2(b)):
               
                           a)
                        
                        
                           Is the submission of a new take back request tied (analogously) to a new time limit under Article 24(2) of the Dublin III Regulation? If so: Does this new time limit start to run when the responsible authority learns of re-entry, or does another event determine its commencement?
                        
                     
                           b)
                        
                        
                           If the other Member State (here, Germany) allows a time limit to expire that is required to be complied with (analogously) under Article 24(2) of the Dublin III Regulation: Does the lodging of a new asylum application pursuant to Article 24(3) of the Dublin III Regulation directly establish the responsibility of the other Member State (here, Germany), or may it, despite the new asylum application, submit a new take back request to the Member State having original responsibility (here, Italy) without being bound by a time limit, or transfer the foreign national to that Member State without submitting a take back request?
                        
                     
                           c)
                        
                        
                           If the other Member State (here, Germany) allows a time limit to expire that is required to be complied with (analogously) under Article 24(2) of the Dublin III Regulation: Is the lis pendens of an asylum application lodged in the other Member State (here, Germany) prior to transfer equivalent to the lodging of a new asylum application pursuant to Article 24(3) of the Dublin III Regulation?
                        
                     
                           d)
                        
                        
                           If the other Member State (here, Germany) allows a time limit to expire that is required to be complied with (analogously) under Article 24(2) of the Dublin III Regulation and the foreign national neither lodges a new asylum application and the lis pendens of an asylum application lodged in the other Member State (here, Germany) prior to transfer is not equivalent to the lodging of a new asylum application pursuant to Article 24(3) of the Dublin III Regulation: Can the other Member State (here, Germany) submit a new take back request to the Member State having original responsibility (here, Italy) without being bound by a time limit, or transfer the foreign national to that Member State without submitting a take back request?
                        
                     
         
      (1)  Regulation (EU) No 604/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 establishing the criteria and mechanisms for determining the Member State responsible for examining an application for international protection lodged in one of the Member States by a third-country national or a stateless person (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 31).