CELEX: 62012FA0097
Language: en
Date: 2013-10-07 00:00:00
Title: Case F-97/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 7 October 2013 — Thomé v Commission (Civil service — Open competition — Competition notice EPSO/AD/177/10 — Decision not to recruit a successful candidate — Criteria for admissibility — University qualification)

11.1.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 9/28
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (1st Chamber) of 7 October 2013 — Thomé v Commission
   (Case F-97/12) (1)
   
   (Civil service - Open competition - Competition notice EPSO/AD/177/10 - Decision not to recruit a successful candidate - Criteria for admissibility - University qualification)
   2014/C 9/46
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Florence Thomé (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Eggers and G. Gattinara, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application to annul the decision of the Commission’s appointing authority not to recruit the applicant after she had passed competition EPSO/AD/177/10-EPA and an application for damages and interest.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the European Commission’s decisions of 11 November 2011 and 5 June 2012;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the European Commission to pay Ms Thomé the sum of EUR 14 000;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Dismisses the application as to the remainder;
            
         
               4.
            
            
               Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Ms Thomé.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 355, 17.11.2012, p. 39.