CELEX: C2006/281/49
Language: en
Date: 2006-11-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-300/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 October 2006 — Moser Baer India v Council (Anti-subsidy investigations — Recordable compact discs originating in India — Calculation of the amount of the subsidy — Determination of injury — Causal link — Rights of the defence)

18.11.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 281/30
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 October 2006 — Moser Baer India v Council
   (Case T-300/03) (1)
   
   (Anti-subsidy investigations - Recordable compact discs originating in India - Calculation of the amount of the subsidy - Determination of injury - Causal link - Rights of the defence)
   (2006/C 281/49)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Moser Baer India Ltd (New Delhi, India) (represented by: A.P. Bentley QC, K. Adamantopoulos, lawyer, R. MacLean and J. Branton, Solicitors)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Marquardt, Agent, assisted by G.M. Berrisch, lawyer)
   Interveners in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. Scharf and K. Talabér-Ricz, Agents) and Committee of European CD-R and DVD+/-R Manufacturers (CECMA), formerly Committee of European CD-R Manufacturers (CECMA) (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: D. Ehle and V. Schiller, lawyers)
   Re:
   Action for annulment of Council Regulation (EC) No 960/2003 of 2 June 2003 imposing a definitive countervailing duty on imports of recordable compact discs originating in India (OJ 2003 L 138, p. 1).
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the defendant;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the interveners to bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 264, 1.11.2003