CELEX: 62013CB0494
Language: en
Date: 2015-01-22 00:00:00
Title: Case C-494/13 P: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2015 — GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Villiger Söhne GmbH Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 8(1)(b) — Figurative mark in colour including the word elements ‘LIBERTE american blend’ on a blue background — Opposition by the proprietor of the Community figurative mark including the word elements ‘La LIBERTAD’ — Refusal of registration

4.5.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 146/6
            
         Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 22 January 2015 — GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Villiger Söhne GmbH
   (Case C-494/13 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Community trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 8(1)(b) - Figurative mark in colour including the word elements ‘LIBERTE american blend’ on a blue background - Opposition by the proprietor of the Community figurative mark including the word elements ‘La LIBERTAD’ - Refusal of registration)
   (2015/C 146/08)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (represented by: I. Memmler and S. Schulz, Rechtsanwältinnnen)
   
      Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent), Villiger Söhne GmbH (represented by: B. Pikolin, Rechtsanwältin)
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 325, 9.11.2013.