CELEX: 62015TA0493
Language: en
Date: 2016-10-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-493/15 P: Judgment of the General Court of 27 October 2016 — Commission v CX (Appeal — Civil Service — Officials — Disciplinary procedure — Disciplinary sanction — Removal from post — Right to be heard — Article 22 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations — Errors of law — Distortion of the evidence — Incomplete examination of the facts and evidence)

12.12.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 462/20
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 27 October 2016 — Commission v CX
   (Case T-493/15 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Disciplinary procedure - Disciplinary sanction - Removal from post - Right to be heard - Article 22 of Annex IX to the Staff Regulations - Errors of law - Distortion of the evidence - Incomplete examination of the facts and evidence))
   (2016/C 462/25)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: European Commission (represented by: C. Ehrbar and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: CX (Enghien, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015, CX v Commission (F-5/14, EU:F:2015:61), seeking to have that judgment set aside.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 18 June 2015, CX v Commission (F-5/14, EU:F:2015:61);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Refers the case back to a Chamber of the General Court of the European Union other than the Chamber which has ruled on the present appeal;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Reserves the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 371, 9.11.2015.