CELEX: 62012TB0023
Language: en
Date: 2013-11-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-23/12: Order of the General Court of 27 November 2013 — MAF v EIOPA (Action for annulment — Languages — Publication by the EIOPA of consultative documents on its internet site exclusively in English — Non-actionable measures — Inadmissibility)

15.2.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 45/31
            
         Order of the General Court of 27 November 2013 — MAF v EIOPA
   (Case T-23/12) (1)
   
   (Action for annulment - Languages - Publication by the EIOPA of consultative documents on its internet site exclusively in English - Non-actionable measures - Inadmissibility)
   2014/C 45/50
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Mutuelle des architectes français assurances (MAF) (Paris, France) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis, É. Marchal and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) (represented by: J. Stuyck and A.-M. Vandromme, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment, first, of an alleged decision of the EIOPA to publish information on its internet site exclusively in English and, specifically, to launch public consultations exclusively in that language and, secondly, of the alleged decision of the Executive Director of the EIOPA, of 16 January 2012, rejecting the MAF’s request for the withdrawal of the first alleged decision and the publication of the abovementioned consultations and all information on the EIOPA’s internet site in all the official languages of the European Union.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The Mutuelle des architectes français assurances (MAF) is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 98, 31.3.2012.