CELEX: 62016TN0687
Language: en
Date: 2016-09-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-687/16: Action brought on 23 September 2016 — Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Nadal Esteban (STYLO & KOTON)

7.11.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 410/31
            
         Action brought on 23 September 2016 — Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Nadal Esteban (STYLO & KOTON)
   (Case T-687/16)
   (2016/C 410/44)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: J. Güell Serra and E. Stoyanov Edissonov, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Joaquín Nadal Esteban (Alcobendas, Spain)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: figurative mark containing the word elements ‘STYLO & KOTON’ — EU trade mark No 9 917 436
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 June 2016 in Case R 1779/2015-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order that the trade mark at issue be declared invalid by EUIPO;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.