CELEX: 62014FB0133
Language: en
Date: 2016-08-01 00:00:00
Title: Case F-133/14: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 1 August 2016 — Poniskaitis v Commission (Civil Service — Officials — Pensions — Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes — Decision on recognition of additional pensionable years applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure — Action manifestly unfounded)

3.10.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 364/53
            
         
      Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 1 August 2016 — Poniskaitis v Commission
      (Case F-133/14) (1)
      
      ((Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Transfer to the EU pension scheme of pension rights acquired under other schemes - Decision on recognition of additional pensionable years applying the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Article 81 of the Rules of Procedure - Action manifestly unfounded))
      (2016/C 364/68)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Jonas Poniskaitis (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis, R. Metz and D. Verbeke, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: J. Currall and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents, and subsequently by G. Gattinara, acting as Agent)
      
         Re:
      
      Application for annulment of the decision concerning the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights to the EU Pension scheme which applies the new GIP relating to Articles 11 and 12 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The action is dismissed as being manifestly unfounded.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Each party shall bear its own costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 16, 19.1.2015, p. 50.