CELEX: 62014TN0767
Language: en
Date: 2014-11-17 00:00:00
Title: Case T-767/14: Action brought on 17 November 2014  — Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn v CPVO — Artevos and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt (Oksana)

9.2.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 46/53
            
         Action brought on 17 November 2014 — Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn v CPVO — Artevos and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt (Oksana)
   (Case T-767/14)
   (2015/C 046/69)
   Language in which the application was lodged: Dutch
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Boomkwekerij van Rijn-de Bruyn BV (Uden, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Jonker, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)
   
      Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Artevos GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany) and Dachverband Kulturpflanzen- und Nutztiervielfalt eV (Bielefeld, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before the CPVO
   
   
      Applicant for Community plant variety right: applicant
   
      Community plant variety right at issue: Oksana — application No 2005/1046
   
      Contested decision: decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 2 July 2014 in Case A 007/2013
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               consequently, uphold the applicant’s appeal against decisions R 1232, OBJ 13-086, OBJ 13-087, OBJ 13-088 and OBJ 13-090 of the CPVO, find that the applicant’s variety is (sufficiently) new within the meaning of Article 10 of Regulation No 2100/94 and grant a Community plant variety right for the applicant’s variety;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the CPVO and the other parties to pay the costs.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               infringement of Articles 10 and 76 of Regulation No 2100/94.