CELEX: 62011TN0389
Language: en
Date: 2011-07-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-389/11: Action brought on 18 July 2011 — Guccio Gucci v OHIM Chang Qing Qing (GUDDY)

24.9.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 282/34
            
         Action brought on 18 July 2011 — Guccio Gucci v OHIM Chang Qing Qing (GUDDY)
   (Case T-389/11)
   2011/C 282/67
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Guccio Gucci SpA (Firenze, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Chang Qing Qing (Firenze, Italy)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 April 2011 in case R 143/2010-1 insofar as it rejected the opposition for the remainder of goods in classes 9 and 14; and
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘GUDDY’, for various goods in classes 9, 14, 18 and 25 — Community trade mark application No 6799531
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No 121988 of the word mark ‘GUCCI’, for goods in classes 9, 14, 18 and 25
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially annulled the decision of the Opposition Division and partially dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009, as the Board of Appeal failed (i) to examine accurately the documents submitted to reach the appropriate conclusion regarding the higher distinctiveness of the trademark ‘GUCCI’ and as regards the phonetic comparison between the trademarks and subsequently erred in (ii) interpreting and applying Article 8(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.