CELEX: 62010TA0595
Language: en
Date: 2014-06-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-595/10: Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2014  — Cantina Broglie 1 v OHIM — Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (RIPASSA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark RIPASSA — Earlier national word mark VINO DI RIPASSO — Relative ground for refusal — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)

4.8.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 253/24
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 18 June 2014 — Cantina Broglie 1 v OHIM — Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (RIPASSA)
   (Case T-595/10) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark RIPASSA - Earlier national word mark VINO DI RIPASSO - Relative ground for refusal - Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons))
   2014/C 253/33
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Cantina Broglie 1 Srl (Peschiera del Garda, Italy) (represented by: A. Rizzoli, lawyer, allowed to replace A. Zenato)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Bullock, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona (Verona, Italy)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the first Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 September 2010 (Case R 63/2010-1) relating to opposition proceedings between the Camera di Commercio, Industria, Artigianato e Agricoltura di Verona and Mr Alberto Zenato
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 September 2010 (Case R 63/2010-1);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 72, 5.3.2011.