CELEX: 52003PC0569
Language: en
Date: 2003-10-01
Title: Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the conclusion of an Agreement aimed at renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America (SEC(2003) 1048)

Avis juridique important

|

52003PC0569

Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the conclusion of an Agreement aimed at renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America (SEC(2003) 1048)  /* COM/2003/0569 final - CNS 2003/0223 */  

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the conclusion of an Agreement aimed at renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America (SEC(2003) 1048)(presented by the Commission)EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUMSubject: Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the conclusion of an Agreement aimed at renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America1. By its Decision of 13 October 1998, the Council approved the conclusion of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America [1]. The Agreement entered into force on 14 October 1998.[1]  OJ L 284, 22.10.1998, p. 35.Article 12(b) of the Agreement provides as follows: "This Agreement is concluded for an initial period of five years. Subject to review by the Parties in the final year of each successive period, the Agreement may be extended with possible amendments, thereafter for additional periods of five years by mutual written agreement by the Parties".2. Such a review was carried out by an independent Panel of experts.The thorough analysis of the impact of the above-mentioned Agreement on the development of transatlantic research cooperation draws an overall positive picture although much more can still be achieved.The different recommendations made by the Panel are acceptable by the Commission, which intends to put them into practice.Of special interest are the recommendations, which will be followed up during the preparation and the implementation phase of the agreement:- "to raise the awareness of the Agreement in the Member States of the European Union in order to increase its relevance and the involvement of the Member States in relation to the European Research Area and the conclusions of the Lisbon Council, including to identify target areas for communication in relevant sectors (science, industry, government)";- "that the Joint Consultative Group of the Agreement be better exploited as a communication vehicle so that scientific and other relevant communities are aware of its agenda and the outcomes of its deliberations. The Joint Consultative Group should encourage input to these deliberations from a wider audience so that it is able to sample a range of opinion";- "as part of the renewal process, to establish a strategy that will build effectively on the foundation in the first five years and better exploit the potential of the Agreement".In addition, the Commission will pay particular attention to the recommendations concerning the balance of reciprocity, a general framework for the question of funding, and to ensure good direct communication with the relevant US government institutionsIn conclusion "the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation constitutes a platform with significant potential. It is recommended that the Agreement should be renewed".3. The authorities of the United States of America have informed the services of the Commission that they would favour the renewal of the above-mentioned Agreement for five more years.The United States want a straightforward renewal, without changing the text of the current Agreement so as to maintain continuity in the scientific and technological relations between the USA and the European Community.Rapid renewal would therefore be in the best interest of both parties.4. Since the material content of the Agreement which will soon expire would remain unchanged, following the normal procedures for negotiating this renewal (Article 300(1) of the EC Treaty) would serve no useful purpose. In addition, given the resulting advantages, for both parties, of rapid renewal, a one-step procedure is suggested (a single procedure and a single act concerning signature and conclusion).In the light of the above considerations, the Commission requests the Council:- to approve, on behalf of the Community, after consulting the European Parliament, the conclusion of an Agreement aimed at renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America;- to authorise the President of the Council to designate the person empowered to sign the Agreement in order to express the consent of the Community to be bound thereby.2003/0223 (CNS)Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the conclusion of an Agreement aimed at renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of AmericaTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular the second paragraph of Article 170, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2), and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3),Having regard to the proposal from the Commission [2],[2]  OJ C ...Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament [3],[3]  ...Whereas:(1) By its Decision of 13 October 1998 [4], the Council approved the conclusion of the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America;[4]  OJ L 284, 22.10.1998, p. 35(2) Article 12(b) of the Agreement provides as follows: "This Agreement is concluded for an initial period ending of five years. Subject to review by the Parties in the final year of each successive period, the Agreement may be extended with possible amendments, thereafter for additional periods of five years by mutual written agreement by the Parties";(3) The authorities of the United States of America have informed the services of the Commission that they would favour the renewal of the above-mentioned Agreement for five more years. Rapid renewal would therefore be in the best interest of both parties;(4) The material content of the renewed Agreement will be identical to the material content of the Agreement, which will expire on 13 October 2003;(5) The Agreement aimed at renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America should be approved on behalf of the Community,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1The Agreement aimed at renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America for an additional period of five years is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.The text of the Agreement is attached to this Decision.Article 2The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to sign the Agreement in order to express the consent of the Community to be bound thereby.Done at Brussels,For the CouncilThe PresidentAGREEMENT RENEWING THE AGREEMENT FOR SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL COOPERATION BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICATHE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY (hereinafter "the Community"), of the one part,AndTHE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, of the other part,hereinafter referred as the "Parties",CONSIDERING the importance of science and technology for their economic and social development;RECOGNISING that the Community and the United States of America are pursuing research and technological activities in a number of areas of common interest, and that participation in each other's research and development activities on a basis of reciprocity will provide mutual benefits;HAVING REGARD to the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America, which was signed in Washington on 5 December 1997 and which will expire on 13 October 2003;DESIRING to pursue their cooperation in science and technology in the formal framework established by the Agreement,HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1The Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America, which was signed in Washington on 5 December 1997 and will expire on 13 October 2003, is hereby renewed for an additional period of five years.Article 2This Agreement shall enter into force on the date on which the Parties have notified each other in writing that their respective internal procedures necessary for its entry into force have been completed.Article 3This Agreement is drawn up in duplicate in the Danish, Dutch, English, Finnish, French, German, Greek, Italian, Portuguese, Spanish and Swedish languages, each of these texts being equally authentic.For the European Community For the Government of the United States of AmericaLEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENTPolicy area(s): RTDActivit(y/ies):International scientific and technological cooperationTitle of action: Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the conclusion of an Agreement aimed at renewing the Agreement for scientific and technological cooperation between the European Community and the Government of the United States of America1. BUDGET LINE(S) + HEADING(S)1.1. Budget lines concernedThe costs incurred in monitoring and implementing the Agreement will be charged to the specific budget headings of the programmes within the Community's RTD Framework Programme (Chapter B6-6013).2. OVERALL FIGURES2.1. Method of calculating the total annual cost of the action (estimate)a. Preparatory activities, review of the cooperation: meetings of the Joint Consultative-Group, exchange of information, visits of officials and experts to the United States of America 50 000 EURb. Scientific and technical workshops/meetings 60 000 EURTOTAL : 110 000 EUR/year3. BUDGET CHARACTERISTICS&gt;TABLE POSITION&gt;4. LEGAL BASIS- With legal basis. - [Multiannual programme - Co-decision (with principal financial reference)].4.1. Titles and references- Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 170(2) thereof, in conjunction with the first sentence of the first subparagraph of Article 300(2) and the first subparagraph of Article 300(3).- Decision No 1513/2002/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 27 June 2002 concerning the Sixth Framework Programme of the European Community for research, technological development and demonstration activities, contributing to the creation of the European Research Area and to innovation (2002-2006).5. DESCRIPTION AND GROUNDS5.1. Need for Community interventionCommunity budget intervention is indispensable because the planned cooperation comes under the implementation of the Framework Programmes, including the budgetary section: participation by the United States of America in certain specific programmes and administrative expenditure on the European side (missions by Community officials, organisation of seminars in the Community and in the USA).5.1.1. Objectives pursuedThe essential objective is to stimulate RTD cooperation between the European Community and the United States of America in the areas covered by the Framework Programmes.- The Agreement is designed to enable the Community and the USA to profit, on the basis of the principle of mutual benefit, from the scientific and technical progress achieved under their respective research programmes, by means of participation by the United States scientific community and industrial sector in Community research projects and independent, non-subsidised participation by bodies established in the Community in US projects.- The beneficiaries in the EC and the USA will be the scientific community, the private sector and the general public, thanks to the direct and indirect effects of cooperation.5.1.2. DurationThe Agreement will be renewed for an additional period of five years and will be renewable by common agreement for further periods of five years.5.2. Actions envisaged and budget intervention arrangements5.2.1. Type of expenditure100% grant (missions to the USA by Commission officials and experts; organisation of workshops, seminars and meetings in the European Community and in the USA).6. FINANCIAL IMPACT6.1. Administrative and technical operating expenditure included in Part B (for the whole programming period)6.1.1. Expenditure on the management of the Decision (estimate)Indicative breakdown, amounts (expressed in millions of euros)&gt;TABLE POSITION&gt;7. FOLLOW-UP AND EVALUATION7.1. Follow-up arrangementsThe activities in the context of the Cooperation Agreement will be regularly evaluated by the relevant Commission departments.This evaluation will cover the following:a. Collection of information: on the basis of data from the specific programmes of the Framework Programmes.b. Overall evaluation: an evaluation of all the cooperation activities in the context of this Agreement will be made by the Commission's departments at the end of each year.8. ANTI-FRAUD MEASURESNumerous administrative and financial audits are provided for at each stage of the cooperation activities in the context of this Agreement. These include in particular:- verification, at various levels, of the statements of expenditure before payment;- audit by the internal audit service;- audit by the Court of Auditors.