CELEX: 62017CA0322
Language: en
Date: 2019-02-07 00:00:00
Title: Case C-322/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Eugen Bogatu v Minister for Social Protection (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social security — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 67 — Application for family benefits submitted by a person who has ceased to pursue an activity as an employed person in the competent Member State but continues to reside there — Entitlement to family benefits for family members resident in another Member State — Eligibility conditions)

8.4.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 131/5
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 7 February 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) — Ireland) — Eugen Bogatu v Minister for Social Protection
      (Case C-322/17) (1)
      
      (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social security - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 67 - Application for family benefits submitted by a person who has ceased to pursue an activity as an employed person in the competent Member State but continues to reside there - Entitlement to family benefits for family members resident in another Member State - Eligibility conditions)
      (2019/C 131/05)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Referring court
      
      High Court (Ireland)
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Eugen Bogatu
      
         Defendant: Minister for Social Protection
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems and, in particular, Article 67, read in conjunction with Article 11(2) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation such as that in the main proceedings, in order to be eligible to receive family benefits in the competent Member State, it is not necessary for a person either to pursue an activity as an employed person in that Member State or to be in receipt of cash benefits from that Member State because or as a consequence of such activity.
      
         (1)  OJ C 277, 21.8.2017.