CELEX: 62011TA0412
Language: en
Date: 2013-02-06 00:00:00
Title: Case T-412/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2013 — Maharishi Foundation v OHIM (TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION — Absolute grounds for refusal — Decision of the Board of Appeal remitting the case to the Examination Division — Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Admissibility — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 — Relevant public)

16.3.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 79/16
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 6 February 2013 — Maharishi Foundation v OHIM (TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION)
   (Case T-412/11) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION - Absolute grounds for refusal - Decision of the Board of Appeal remitting the case to the Examination Division - Article 65(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Admissibility - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Relevant public)
   2013/C 79/29
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Maharishi Foundation Ltd (Saint-Hélier, Jersey) (represented by: A. Meijboom, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 March 2011 (Case R 1293/2010-2), concerning an application for registration of the word sign TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION as a Community trade mark
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Maharishi Foundation Ltd to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.