CELEX: 62014CN0065
Language: en
Date: 2014-02-10 00:00:00
Title: Case C-65/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du Travail de Nivelles (Belgium) lodged on 10 February 2014  — Charlotte Rosselle v Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI), Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM Libres)

28.4.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 129/13
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du Travail de Nivelles (Belgium) lodged on 10 February 2014 — Charlotte Rosselle v Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI), Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM Libres)
   (Case C-65/14)
   2014/C 129/16
   Language of the case: French
   
      Referring court
   
   Tribunal du Travail de Nivelles
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Charlotte Rosselle
   
      Defendants: Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI), Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM Libres)
   
      Intervener: Institut pour l'Egalité des Femmes et des Hommes (IEFH)
   
      Question referred
   
   Do sections 1 and 2 of title III, chapter III, of the Royal Decree of 3 July 1996 implementing the Law of 14 July 1994 coordinating compulsory medical care and sickness benefit insurance infringe Council Directive 92/85/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the introduction of measures to encourage improvements in the safety and health at work of pregnant workers and workers who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding (1) and Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (recast) (2) in failing to provide for an exemption from the minimum contribution period for a public servant assigned non-active status for personal reasons who is on maternity leave, whereas such an exemption is provided for a public servant who has resigned or has been dismissed?
   
      (1)  OJ 1992 L 348, p. 1.
   
      (2)  OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23.