CELEX: 62010TA0505
Language: en
Date: 2013-04-10 00:00:00
Title: Case T-505/10: Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2013 — Höganäs v OHIM — Haynes (ASTALOY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ASTALOY — Earlier Community word mark HASTELLOY — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Coexistence of trade marks)

25.5.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 147/16
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2013 — Höganäs v OHIM — Haynes (ASTALOY)
   (Case T-505/10) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ASTALOY - Earlier Community word mark HASTELLOY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Coexistence of trade marks)
   2013/C 147/27
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Höganäs AB (Höganäs, Sweden) (represented by: L.-E. Ström, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Haynes International, Inc. (Kokomo, Indiana (United States)) (represented by: E. Armijo Chávarri and A. Castán Pérez-Gómez, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 August 2010 (Case R 1530/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Haynes International, Inc. and Höganäs AB.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Höganäs AB to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 346, 18.12.2010.