CELEX: 62019CB0390
Language: en
Date: 2020-04-02 00:00:00
Title: Case C-390/19 P: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — Italian Republic v European Commission, French Republic, Hungary (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) — European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) — Sugar sector — Expenditure excluded from EU financing — Expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic — Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)

31.8.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 287/17
            
         
      Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 April 2020 — Italian Republic v European Commission, French Republic, Hungary
      (Case C-390/19 P) (1)
      
      (Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) - European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) - Sugar sector - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Expenditure incurred by the Italian Republic - Appeal, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded)
      (2020/C 287/25)
      Language of the case: Italian
      
         Parties
      
      
         Appellant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, assisted by C. Colelli and M.F. Severi, avvocatti dello Stato)
      
         Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Bianchi and B. Hofstötter, acting as Agents), French Republic, Hungary
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The appeal is dismissed as being, in part, manifestly inadmissible and, in part, manifestly unfounded.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  The Italian Republic is ordered to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 230, 8.7.2019.