CELEX: 62008CA0393
Language: en
Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00
Title: Case C-393/08: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio — Italy) — Emanuela Sbarigia v Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia, Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma (National legislation governing opening times and closing days of pharmacies — Exemption — Power of decision of the competent authorities)

28.8.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 234/6
            
         Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 1 July 2010 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio — Italy) — Emanuela Sbarigia v Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia, Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma
   (Case C-393/08) (1)
   
   (National legislation governing opening times and closing days of pharmacies - Exemption - Power of decision of the competent authorities)
   2010/C 234/08
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Referring court
   
   Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Emanuela Sbarigia
   
      Defendants: Azienda USL RM/A, Comune di Roma, Assiprofar — Associazione Sindacale Proprietari Farmacia, Ordine dei Farmacisti della Provincia di Roma
   
      Re:
   
   Reference for a Preliminary Ruling — Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale del Lazio– Interpretation of Arts 49, 81 to 86, 152 and 153 EC — National legislation governing the opening hours and rota arrangements for pharmacies — Pharmacists forbidden to decline annual holiday closure or to remain open beyond the maximum limits set for opening hours
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per il Lazio, made by decision of 21 May 2008, is inadmissible.
   
      (1)  OJ C 285, 8.11.2008.