CELEX: 62006TA0099
Language: en
Date: 2009-09-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-99/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2009 — Phildar v OHIM — Comercial Jacinto Parera (FILDOR) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark FILDOR — Earlier national semi-figurative mark PHILDAR — Earlier national word mark FILDOR — Earlier international word and semi-figurative marks PHILDAR — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Articles 8(1)(b), 62 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 8(1)(b), 64 and 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

7.11.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 267/54
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 23 September 2009 — Phildar v OHIM — Comercial Jacinto Parera (FILDOR)
   (Case T-99/06) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark FILDOR - Earlier national semi-figurative mark PHILDAR - Earlier national word mark FILDOR - Earlier international word and semi-figurative marks PHILDAR - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Articles 8(1)(b), 62 and 73 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Articles 8(1)(b), 64 and 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2009/C 267/91
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Phildar SA (Roubaix, France) (represented by: E. Baud, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Comercial Jacinto Parera SA (Barcelona, Spain)
   
      Re:
   
   Action against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 January 2006 (Case R 245/2004-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Phildar SA and Comercial Jacinto Parera, SA.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 16 January 2006 (Case R 245/2004-2);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 121, 20.5.2006.