CELEX: 52013PC0027
Language: en
Date: 2013-01-30
Title: Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Union Agency for Railways and repealing Regulation (EC) No 881/2004

|
			
		
		
		52013PC0027
		
			Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on the European Union Agency for Railways and repealing Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 /* COM/2013/027 final - 2013/0014 (COD) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
1.1.        Recent EU policy
developments in the railway field
In its White Paper ‘Roadmap to a Single
European Transport Area — Towards a competitive and resource efficient
transport system’, adopted on 28 March 2011 (‘the 2011 White Paper’), the
Commission set out its vision of a Single European Railway Area, i.e. an internal
railway market in which European railway undertakings could provide services
without unnecessary technical and administrative barriers.
The European Council conclusions of January
2012 also highlight the importance of releasing the growth-creating potential
of a fully integrated Single Market, for network industries as well as others[1].
Furthermore, the Commission Communication on Action for Stability, Growth and
Jobs adopted on 30 May 2012[2] stresses the importance
of reducing further the regulatory burden and barriers to entry in the rail
sector, making country-specific recommendations for this purpose. And on 6 June
2012, the Commission adopted the Communication on strengthening the governance
of the single market, which likewise stresses the importance of the transport
sector[3].
In the last decade, the EU railway market
has seen massive changes, gradually introduced by three legislative ‘railway
packages’ (and some accompanying acts) intended to open up the national markets
and make railways more competitive and interoperable at EU level, while
maintaining a high level of safety. However, despite the considerable
development of EU laws and other measures (the ‘EU acquis’) establishing
an internal market for rail transport services, the railways’ share of intra-EU
transport has remained modest. The Commission has therefore come forward with a
Fourth Railway Package to enhance the quality and efficiency of rail services
by removing the remaining market obstacles.
The present Regulation is a component of
the Fourth Railway Package focusing on the removal of remaining administrative
and technical barriers, in particular by establishing a common approach to
safety and interoperability rules to increase economies of scale for railway
undertakings active across the EU, decreasing administrative costs and
accelerating administrative procedures, as well as avoiding disguised
discrimination, through a European Union Agency for Railways. It is intended to
replace the original founding Regulation, and add new important tasks to the
Agency making it a truly European Railway Authority in the field of
interoperability and safety.
1.2.        Why to replace existing Regulation
881/2004 (as amended) with a new act?
Since 2004, when the original founding
Regulation was drafted, a number of developments have taken place in relation
to the European railways and the Agency. There has been mounting evidence on
the functioning of the EU railway internal market, also in relation to its
interoperability and safety aspects. New legislation emerged which resulted in
amending the Agency Regulation (2008) or which developed the existing tasks of
ERA without changing its Regulation (e.g. Decision 2011/155/EU).
The impact assessment report accompanying
this proposal has identified a number of measures which would give new powers
to the Agency and streamline existing processes. 
Moreover, a number of changes have to be
introduced to improve the functioning of the Agency in result of the evaluation
of ERA founding Regulation and of the Agency (2009-2010) as well as the
recommendations of the Joint Statement of the Commission, the European
Parliament and the Council on decentralised agencies (2012), and the Position paper
of the Administrative Board on the future of the Agency (2012). This concerns
particularly improvements to internal structure, governance and decision-making
of the Agency, and its relations with stakeholders.
A new Regulation will also help to clarify the
structure of the legal act (e.g. by removing and renumbering the Articles) and
make it more logical (e.g. by moving some Articles to more relevant Chapters,
creating new Chapters and deleting the obsolete ones). Finally, the
Interoperability and Safety Directives are also being amended within this
legislative package and they are closely related to the tasks of ERA, therefore
this Regulation has to properly take this into account.
On the basis above, and taking into account
the advice of the Legal Service, the Commission intends to propose a new ERA Regulation
replacing original Regulation 881/2004. There is a number of changes in
relation to Regulation 881/2004, which can be grouped in three different
categories:
·                        
New provisions: new
tasks of the Agency (issuing vehicle authorisations for placing on the market, authorisations
for placing in service of trackside control-command and signalling sub-systems and
safety certificates), reinforced control over national authorities, more powers
in relation to national rules, new source of ERA’s budget (fees and charges),
the Board of Appeal; some new provisions – especially in the internal
organisation part – result from the Common Approach on the EU agencies.
·                        
Clarification/simplification of existing
provisions: especially in relation to working
methods, the ERTMS, railway staff, registers, other tasks.
·                        
Updates due to
the evolution of the legislative and political framework: provisions concerning
internal structure and operation, as well as references to comitology
procedures and delegated acts.
·                        
Editorial changes
in relation to the original Regulation.
1.3.        Links between this
Regulation and the Interoperability and Safety Directives
Directive 2008/57/EC (Railway
Interoperability Directive) and Directive 2004/49/EC (Railway Safety Directive)
are closely linked with original Regulation 881/2004. In the 4th
railway package, these Directives are proposed to be recast; they will,
nevertheless, remain closely linked with the present Regulation. This
predominantly stems from the fact that the Agency acts in the fields of railway
interoperability and safety for which those directives provide the legal basis.
In the present Regulation, the links concern
in particular:
–                        
technical specifications for interoperability
(TSIs; Interoperability Directive), common safety targets (CSTs; Safety
Directive) and common safety methods (CSMs; Safety Directive): the Agency is
responsible for drawing up recommendations for them to be adopted by the
Commission, and for issuing opinions to the Commission regarding
non-application of TSIs;
–                        
safety certificates: the Agency is responsible
for issuing them, while the full procedure is provided in the Safety Directive;
–                        
registers: the Agency is responsible for issuing
recommendations to the Commission regarding specification for registers
(referred to in the Interoperability Directive) and their revision, and
ensuring there are accessible to the public;
–                        
authorisations for placing on the market for
railway vehicles and types of vehicles and authorisation for placing in service
of trackside control-command and signalling sub-systems: the Agency is
responsible for issuing them, while the full procedure for applying for them is
provided in the Interoperability Directive;
–                        
telematics applications and European Rail
Traffic Management System (ERTMS): these are specific areas governed by
relevant TSIs adopted under the Interoperability Directive where the Agency has
an important role to play being a system authority;
–                        
notified conformity assessment bodies: the
Agency is responsible for supporting and monitoring their activities while they
are created and given tasks by the Interoperability Directive;
–                        
national safety authorities: the Agency is
responsible for supporting and monitoring their activities while they are
created and given tasks by the Safety Directive;
–                        
national railway rules: the Agency is
responsible for their examination with a view to their reduction while the
procedure for their notification is provided for in the Safety and Interoperability
Directives. 
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS WITH THE
INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
The Commission services have discussed the
developments of the Single European Railway Area with sector representatives on
an on-going basis. In 2010-2011 it conducted an ex post evaluation of
Regulation 881/2004 and the functioning of the European Union Agency for
Railways[4]. This evaluation, together
with the general evaluation of the EU Agencies in 2009, showed the added value
provided by the Agency and in general a positive opinion of stakeholders in
relation to ERA and its outputs. The results of the evaluation have been used
as an important input and preparatory work to the subsequent process of impact
assessment linked with the revision of the Regulation.
The European Commission carried out a
thorough impact assessment to support legislative proposals on improving the efficiency
and competitiveness of the Single European Railway Area in the field of
interoperability and safety. An Impact Assessment Steering Group (IASG) was
created in June 2011 to which all DGs were invited by DG MOVE to participate.
An external consultant drafted an impact
assessment support study and conducted a targeted consultation of stakeholders.
The targeted consultation started on 18 November 2011 with an internet survey
that finished on 30 December 2011. It was followed by interviews with the most
significant stakeholders and a stakeholder workshop at the end of February
2012.
Since then, DG MOVE has engaged in
bilateral meetings with the sector to gauge their views on what should be done
in the Fourth Package in the area of interoperability and safety.
Given the technical nature of the
initiative, no public consultation was carried out. However, the Commission took
care that all interested parties were consulted in due time and discussions
covered all the key elements of the initiative.
Impact Assessment Board:
On 5 September 2012 the Impact Assessment
Board met and subsequently gave a positive opinion. The Board’s main recommendations
were incorporated in the impact assessment report:
–                        
more statistics and information on stakeholders’
consultation were added;
–                        
expected synergies with other elements of the Fourth
Railway Package were added and indirect impacts clarified;
–                        
the core measures common to options 2-5 were
described in more detail and clarified regarding their differentiation;
–                        
the methods used to assess impact were clarified
and better explained; the logic was brought out by better cross-referencing;
–                        
administrative costs for economic actors
(railway operators) and the cost to public administrations (national
authorities, ERA and the Commission) were distinguished more clearly.
Options identified:
Based on the screening of individual
measures, the Commission has identified five policy options (options 2-6),
besides the baseline scenario. By construction, options 2-5 concern primarily
the level of interaction between the European Union Agency for Railways (ERA or
the Agency) and national authorities and are all capable of tackling the three
operational objectives. Option 6 is a set of horizontal measures which are
mostly independent of the interactions between ERA and national authorities and
can be applied on top of any of the option 2-5, with expected reinforcement of
the overall final impact.
Option 1: Baseline scenario (do nothing) —
continuing on the path that is currently set out for the sector
Option 2: Greater coordination role for the
Agency in ensuring a consistent approach to certification of railway
undertakings and vehicle authorisation
Option 3: ERA as a one-stop-shop, where the
final decision on certification and authorisation remains with the NSAs but ERA
performs entry and exit checks of applications and of the decisions
Option 4: ERA and NSAs share competencies,
where the final decision on certification and authorisation is taken by the
Agency
Option 5: ERA takes over activities of NSAs
in relation to certification of railway undertakings and vehicle authorisation
Option 6: Horizontal measures, includes
other legislative and soft measures (beyond sharing the responsibilities
between national authorities and ERA) that could be implemented to improve the
competitiveness of the rail sector, like    enhancing the role of ERA in the
dissemination of railway-related information and training or migrating from
national technical and safety rules to a system of EU rules (through the
identification of unnecessary rules by ERA and NSAs and then the requirement
for national authorities to remove those rules, as well as limiting the
possibility of adopting new rules).
Impacts of the options: The environmental
impact of all the options was assessed as positive, though low. The social
impact of all the options was assessed as low/marginal.
The table below presents the economic benefits
(efficiency) and number of objectives met (effectiveness) for combined options:
 Option || Efficiency (Total Net Benefit € m) || Effectiveness (number of operational objectives met) 
 Option 2+6: Further ERA ‘Coordination’ + horizontal measures || 411 || 1 
 Option 3+6: ERA as One-Stop-Shop+ horizontal measures || 461 || 2 
 Option 4+6: ERA and NSAs share competencies + horizontal measures || 497 || 3 
 Option 5+6: ERA takes over activities of NSAs regarding authorisation & certification+ horizontal measures || 476 || 3 
It was concluded that Option 4 (combined
with option 6) was the preferred option as it provides the best balance of
outcomes in relation to:
–                        
the industry, in terms of reduced costs and
timescales for safety certification and vehicle and other sub-system
authorisation;
–                        
cost implications for the EU budget;
–                        
the cost impacts on national institutions;
–                        
accordance with the subsidiarity and
proportionality principles;
–                        
addressing the problems identified, and
–                        
meeting the objectives.
More information on the impact assessment
and the results of the stakeholder consultation is provided in the Commission
staff working document accompanying legislative proposals to eliminate
remaining administrative and technical barriers in the field of
interoperability and safety on the EU railway market. It will be published on
the website of the Secretariat-General of the Commission following the adoption
of this legal act.
3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL
This section comments on and explains the main
provisions of the new ERA Regulation, when necessary in relation to amendments
to the original text of Regulation 881/2004. 
CHAPTER 1 PRINCIPLES:
Article 1: the objectives have been revised
to reflect new tasks of the Agency and moved to the recitals; instead, a
"subject matter and scope" is given, for clarity.
Article 2: legal status moved here as more
appropriate (previously original Article 22).
Article 3: amended to properly reflect new
types of acts of the Agency.
CHAPTER 2
WORKING METHODS:
New chapter added to cover issues which
were originally in other chapters but which in fact relate to the methods by which
ERA attains its objectives.
Article 4: "working parties"
article rewritten for legal clarity, in particular: the reference to AEIF is obsolete
now and can be deleted; original Article 24(4) was moved here instead of the
article on ERA staff; rules of procedure to be adopted by the Board.
Article 7: "impact assessment"; the
original text limited cost-benefit analysis to safety only (Article 6(4)); this
task should not be part of any particular Agency activity, hence the need to
move the paragraphs into a general section, make it generally applicable and
provide clear tasks; this is in accordance with the Position paper of the Board
on the future of ERA and the principles of activity-based budgeting and management.
Article 8: "studies"; previously
Article 20 — moved as studies are means of achieving the objectives and not
tasks as such.
Article 9: "opinions"; formerly
Article 10 on Technical Opinions; the word ‘technical’ is deleted, in line with
the directives; paragraph 2a(b) removed as obsolete; paragraph 3 (original paragraph
2b) amended to broaden its scope (previously limited to TSIs only, without a
clear rationale).
Article 10: "visits to Member
States"; previously Article 33 — moved to this section as the visits are
means of achieving the Agency’s objectives.
CHAPTER 3 TASKS
RELATING TO RAILWAY SAFETY:
Article 11: "technical support –
safety"; minor changes clarifying the Agency’s tasks.
Article 12: "safety
certificates"; new role of ERA (issuing of safety certificates), as
proposed in the IA report, in line with the revised Safety Directive.
Article 13: "maintenance of vehicles";
new article — left over from original Chapter 3a, simplified and moved to the
safety part as being the most relevant.
Article 14: "transport of dangerous
goods by rail"; new article, formalising what ERA is actually doing
already in the field of transport of dangerous goods by rail.
CHAPTER 4 TASKS
RELATING TO INTEROPERABILITY:
Article 15: "technical support – interoperability";
amended slightly to reflect changes in the Interoperability Directive (points b
and c) and to clarify the existing tasks of ERA.
Article 16: "vehicle authorisations";
new article — covering ERA’s new role in issuing vehicle authorisations for
placing on the market, as proposed in the IA report, in line with the amended
Interoperability Directive.
Article 17: "authorisations for type
of vehicles"; new article — covering ERA’s new role in issuing authorisations
for placing on the market for types of vehicles, in line with the amended
Interoperability Directive.
Article 18: "authorisation for placing
in service of trackside control-command and signalling sub-systems"; new
article — covering ERA’s new role regarding authorisation of track-side control-command
and signalling equipment; linked with ERA’s role as the system authority and
the consequences of the new task of issuing of vehicle authorisations for
placing on the market for the ERTMS (in order to ensure that the authorisations
for placing on the market issued for vehicles with ERTMS equipment on board are
consistent with track-side systems).
Article 19: "telematics
applications"; new article added to formalise the existing role ERA plays
already, according to TAP/TAF TSI, and in line with the IA report. 
Article 20: "support for the notified
conformity assessment bodies"; amended — provisions on Commission
monitoring of notified bodies have been moved to the new section on monitoring;
the remainder is support for notified bodies (the Commission assigned tasks
relating to the Technical Secretariat of the NB Rail to the Agency as of 20
April 2011 and this activity is already on-going; this needs to be properly
reflected in the legislation).
CHAPTER 5 TASKS
RELATING TO NATIONAL RULES (moved after the chapter on interoperability):
Articles 21, 22 and 23: "national
rules"; new articles which incorporate original Articles 9a and 9b, amended
to align procedures with the Interoperability and Safety Directives and take
into account the extended powers of ERA in relation to national rules resulting
from the IA report and draft report of the Task Force on National Safety Rules;
management of the IT database given clearly to ERA, in order to clarify
previous mixed responsibilities (Commission and ERA) and to overcome current
technical, coordination and ownership problems.
CHAPTER 6 TASKS
RELATING TO ERTMS: the ERTMS section deserves a separate new chapter.
Articles 24-28: "ERTMS tasks" these
incorporate the original Article 21a, amended to clarify the responsibilities
of the Agency and other actors in relation to the ERTMS, to improve ERTMS deployment,
and to reflect what ERA is already currently doing in this field; Article 13e amended
in line with preliminary Commission evaluation of four years of technical
follow-up.
CHAPTER 7 TASKS
RELATING TO MONITORING SINGLE EUROPEAN RAILWAY AREA: new chapter — various
tasks related to monitoring are now combined together in one chapter for better
visibility and clarity.
Article 29: "monitoring of national
safety authorities"; new article — new ERA task: control over NSAs, as
proposed in the IA report (and in the evaluation of the ERA Regulation).
Article 30: "monitoring of notified
bodies"; new article — new ERA task: control over notified bodies, as
proposed in the IA report.
Article 31: "monitoring progress of
interoperability and safety"; partly based on original Article 9 (new
paragraphs 1 and 2, with ERA’s tasks in relation to safety monitoring now
clarified), on original Article 14 (new paragraphs 3 and 4, with two separate
reports on interoperability and safety now merged into one); paragraph 5 — based
on Article 21b (2a), in accordance with the IA report and the evaluation of the
ERA Regulation.
CHAPTER 8 OTHER
TASKS – new chapter combining previous chapters on registers, railway staff and
other tasks:
Article 32: "railway staff";
combines original Articles 16b, 16c and 17 to simplify: some tasks are
obsolete, others are described in Directive 2007/59; amended to avoid legal
ambiguity and repetition.
Article 33: "registers"; this
article combines original Articles 18 and 19, updated and aligned with
legislation.
Article 34: "networks of national
safety authorities, investigating bodies and representative bodies"; previously
partly in original Article 6(5) and Article 9; the network of representative
bodies has been added (paragraph 2) to improve and structure coordination of
stakeholders at Agency level; paragraph 3 has been added to improve and
structure consultation of all stakeholders, and ultimately to obtain higher
quality outputs from the Agency (in line with the evaluation of ERA Regulation
and Position paper on the future of ERA).
Article 35: "communication and
dissemination"; new article, formalising partly the existing activities of
ERA and stemming from IA report, the evaluation of the ERA Regulation and the
Position paper on the future of the Agency.
Article 36: "research and promotion of
innovation"; original article with research added, formalising what ERA is
already doing to a large extent; in line with the Position paper of the Board
on the Future of ERA.
Article 37: "assistance to the
Commission"; amended slightly.
Article 38: "assistance with the
assessment of rail projects"; originally Article 15, scope was extended to
cover safety.
Article 39: "assistance to MS and
stakeholders"; new article, following the IA report (measure from Option
6) and the results of the evaluation of the ERA Regulation.
Article 40: "international relations";
new article formalising what ERA is already doing to a large extent; in line
with the IA report and the Position paper of the Board on the Future of ERA.
Article 41: "spare parts"; new
article — new task in line with the IA report.
CHAPTER 9 ORGANISATION
OF THE AGENCY: drafted largely to follow the Joint Statement of the Commission,
the European Parliament and the Council on decentralised agencies and the
Common Approach (2012), in particular in relation to: extended competences of
the Management Board (previously Administrative); creation of Executive Board;
multi-annual work programme; other standard provisions regarding HR and
budgetary issues. 
Other important changes:
Article 48: "annual and multi-annual
work programmes"; new, separate article on work programmes deemed useful
for clarity; in accordance with the Joint Statement and recommendations of the CoA,
EP, the evaluation of the ERA Regulation and the Position paper of the ERA
Board on the Future of the Agency (multi-annual perspective, ABB and ABM,
relations with stakeholders).
Articles 51-57: "Board of
Appeal"; new articles — Board of Appeal necessary following extension of
ERA competences (issuing of vehicle authorisations for placing on the market
and safety certificates); IA report provides for the creation of an independent
Appeal Body outside the Agency, however, it seems that the solution already in
place at the EASA is more appropriate; based on the relevant provisions of the
EASA Regulation.
CHAPTER 10
FINANCIAL PROVISIONS:
Article 58(2): new point (c) — new sources
of ERA income added (external fees and charges for issuing vehicle authorisations
for placing on the market and safety certificates (new tasks)); new point (e) —
to bring it into line with the EASA regulation
CHAPTER 11 STAFF:
new chapter, following largely standard provisions resulting from the Common
Approach on agencies (Articles 62 and 63).
Article 61: "staff – general
provisions"; originally Article 24, amended in accordance with the Joint
Statement on agencies, the evaluation of the ERA Regulation and the Position paper
of the ERA Board on the Future of the Agency; previous limitations of maximum
contract deleted.
CHAPTER 12 GENERAL
PROVISIONS: 
Articles 64, 66-68, 70-72: moved from other
parts of the original Regulation, amended if necessary following Joint
Statement on agencies.
Article 65: "headquarters agreement
and operating conditions"; new article, following the Joint Statement on
decentralised agencies (2012).
Article 69: "cooperation with national
authorities and bodies"; new articles resulting from new powers of ERA to
issue certificates and authorisations; cooperation with national bodies and
authorities in some cases deemed necessary due to their expertise; possibility
of (sub)contract part of ERA's tasks.
CHAPTER 13 FINAL
PROVISIONS: new chapter
Article 73 and 74: "delegated
acts"; new articles — following ERA’s new powers (to issue safety
certificates and vehicle authorisations for placing on the market, own
resources) there is a need to adopt delegated measures; this is similar to the
case of EASA.
Article 75: "committee procedure";
new article, made in order not to refer to other acts (Interoperability
Directive).
Article 76: "evaluation and
review"; original article amended in accordance with the Joint Statement
on agencies.
ARTICLES WHICH STAYED THE SAME AS IN
REGULATION 881/2004: 5, 6, 58, 59, 60.
4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION
This new Regulation provides a legislative
basis for budgetary and staff commitments in relation to the European Union
Agency for Railways. The detailed calculations are provided in the Annex, in
the Legislative Financial Statement.
It is important to point out that, as far
as ERA staffing is concerned, the present act incorporates:
1.           resources calculations
from two previous Financial Legislative Statements attached to the original
Regulation 881/2004 and the 2008 amendment to it (Regulation 1335/2008), which
provided for 104 temporary staff for ERA;
2.           budgetary procedures for 2005-2013
by which the Budgetary Authority granted ERA an extra 39 posts to cover
additional tasks not reflected in the founding Regulation, resulting in total
143 temporary staff posts in 2013;
3.           the estimated resources
implications of the new tasks and enhanced powers of ERA envisaged in the
current new Regulation, set at 43 persons.
Regarding point 2, note that the
number of posts has gradually increased since ERA was set up in 2005. This
change has been subject to detailed annual scrutiny and has been adopted by the
budgetary authority every year in accordance with the number of posts proposed
by the Commission. The main explanation for the difference between point 1 and
2 is that a number of functions and activities such as legal affairs, Data
Protection Officer, Secretariat for the Administrative Board, internal audit,
quality and business planning, economic evaluation (impact assessment),
procurement, facilities management, and a Head of Administration were not provided
for in the founding Regulation — or at least not planned to be carried out by
dedicated staff. For some areas of activity, including HR, IT and Finance,
resource needs were considerably underestimated.
Concerning economic evaluation, this
activity follows from the fact that ERA was set up to contribute to an
integrated and competitive railway area. It has been an integral part of the
Agency’s activities from the beginning — even if no dedicated staff were
provided for in the financial statement. The need for this activity is
unquestionable and has recently grown in line with the Activity-Based Budgeting
approach; this is reflected in the fact that a new Article is proposed for
inclusion in the new Agency Regulation.
In addition to these developments, various
Commission acts have given the Agency additional tasks with resource
implications, without being properly reflected in the financial statement. For
example, Commission Decision 2011/155/EU on the publication and management of
the reference document referred to in Article 27(4) of Directive 2008/57/EC put
additional tasks on the Agency in relation to making transparent and
simplifying the processes and rules used for authorising railway vehicles and
subsystems. More specifically, ERA’s role concerns documentation of
authorisation processes in Member States, documentation of national rules
applied to the authorisation of railway vehicles and checking of data
consistencies, support to National Safety Authorities and management and
maintenance of data.
Regarding point 3, the budgetary and
staff implications of new and extended tasks stem principally from the impact
assessment calculations, implementation of the recommendations in the Joint
Statement by the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council on
decentralised agencies, Court of Auditors and Internal Audit Service
recommendations, and the evaluation of the ERA Regulation. All the changes in
legislation are substantially explained in part 3 of this Memorandum. The total
of 70 persons is estimated to be needed to deal with these new and extended
tasks, with 43 additional staff in relation to the current level of staffing of
the Agency. These 43 new persons will be dealing with issuing authorisations
and certificates and will be covered by external fees and charges while the remaining
needs of 27 persons will be covered by internal redeployment of existing staff
of the Agency. Therefore, there will be no additional impact on the EU budget
(except for years 2015 and 2016, when external fees and charges will not be
available yet).
The planned additional personnel of 43 would
cover the following categories:
·                        
Technical experts (41 persons), to deal with
issuing of authorisations for placing on the market of vehicles and vehicles
types (30), authorisations for placing in service of trackside control-command
and signalling sub-systems (6) and safety certificates (5);
·                        
Linked administrative staff (2), including an accountant
to deal with management of a planned system of external fees and charges,
including cooperation with national authorities.
The external fees and charges would also
cover linked overhead costs, mainly:
·                        
Translation of decisions issued by ERA into
national languages;
·                        
IT system needed for accountancy purposes
(external fees and charges).
The remaining 27 persons, to be covered by
internal redeployment of existing staff of the Agency, would deal with:
·                        
Monitoring of national safety authorities and
notified bodies, and implementation
of national safety and interoperability legislation ;
·                        
Reduction of number of national rules ;
·                        
Advice and support to Member States and
stakeholders, dissemination of railway-related information and training and
coordination of potential spare parts to be standardised .
The overall budgetary implication of ERA for
the EU budget in 2015-2020 is estimated at € 157.113 M. The cost to the EU
budget of new tasks amounts to € 0.4113 M as from 2017 onwards they will be
covered by fees and charges paid by the industry.
There is also impact on Commission resources (in
the DG MOVE). With regard to this, the present Regulation incorporates:
1.           resources calculations
from two previous Legislative Financial Statements attached to the original
Regulation 881/2004 and the 2008 amendment to it (Regulation 1335/2008), which
provided for two officials/temporary staff for the Commission;
2.           changes for 2005-2013, with
three extra Commission staff dealing with ERA-related issues, to cover
additional tasks not reflected in the founding Regulation;
The overall total for the Commission linked
to the current initiative will be 5 persons, with no new staff requested.
2013/0014 (COD)
Proposal for a
REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL
on the European Union Agency for Railways 
and repealing Regulation (EC) No
881/2004
(Text with EEA relevance) 
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 91(1)
thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from
the European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative
act to the national Parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the
European Economic and Social Committee[5],
Having regard to the opinion of the
Committee of the Regions[6],
Acting in accordance with the ordinary
legislative procedure,
Whereas:
(1)       The progressive
establishment of a European railway area without frontiers requires Union
action in the field of the technical regulations applicable to railways with
regard to the technical aspects (interoperability) and the safety aspects, the
two being inextricably linked and both requiring higher level of harmonisation
at the Union level. Relevant railway legislation, in particular three railway
packages, was adopted in the last two decades, with Directive 2004/49/EC of the
European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on safety on the
Community’s railways and Directive 2008/57/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 17 June 2008 on the interoperability of the rail system within
the Community being the most relevant. 
(2)       Simultaneous pursuit of
the goals of railway safety and interoperability requires substantial technical
work which must be led by a specialised body. That is why it was necessary, as
part of the Second Railway Package in 2004, to create within the existing
institutional framework, and with respect for the balance of power in the Union,
a European agency responsible for railway safety and interoperability
(hereinafter referred to as the Agency). 
(3)       The European Railway
Agency was originally established by Regulation (EC) 881/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
29 April 2004[7]
, in order to promote the establishment of a European railway area without
borders and to help revitalise the railway sector while reinforcing its
essential advantages in terms of safety. Regulation 881/2004 has to be replaced by a new act due to
substantial amount of changes to the tasks of the Agency and its internal
organisation. 
(4)       The
Fourth Railway Package proposes important changes to improve the functioning of
the Single European railway area through amendments by way of recast to Directive 2004/49/EC and Directive
2008/57/EC, both directly linked to the tasks of the Agency. Those Directives,
together with this Regulation, provide in particular for performing tasks
related to issuing vehicle authorisations and safety certificates at the Union
level. It implies a greater role of the Agency. 
(5)       The Agency should
contribute to the creation and effective functioning of a Single European
railway area without frontiers and guaranteeing a high level of safety while
improving the competitive position of the railway sector. That should be
attained by contributing, on technical matters, to the implementation of
European Union legislation by enhancing the level of interoperability of railway
systems and to developing a common approach to safety on the European railway
system. The Agency should also perform the role of European authority
responsible for issuing authorisations for placing on the market for railway
vehicles and for types of vehicles, safety certificates for railway
undertakings and authorisations for placing in service of trackside
control-command and signalling sub-systems. Moreover, it should monitor national
railway rules and the performance of national authorities acting in the railway
interoperability and safety fields.
(6)       In pursuing its
objectives, the Agency should take full account of the process of enlargement
of the Union and of the specific constraints relating to rail links with third
countries. The Agency should have sole responsibility for the functions and
powers assigned to it.
(7)       The Agency, while
performing its tasks, and particularly in relation to drafting recommendations,
should take upmost account of external railway expertise. This expertise should
predominantly consist of professionals from the railway sector and the relevant
national authorities. They should form competent and representative working
parties of the Agency.
(8)       In order to provide
insight into the economic effects on the railway sector and its impact on
society, to allow others to make informed decisions, and to manage the work
priorities and resource allocation more effectively within the Agency, the
Agency should further develop its engagement in the impact assessment activity.
(9)       The Agency should provide
independent and objective technical support, predominantly to the Commission. Directive
…. [Railway Interoperability] provides the basis for drafting and revising Technical
Specifications for Interoperability (TSIs) while Directive … [Railway Safety] provides
the basis for drafting and revising Common Safety Methods (CSMs) and Common
Safety Targets (CSTs). The continuity of the work and the development of the
TSIs, CSMs and CSTs over time require a permanent technical framework and a dedicated
staff of a specialised body. To this end, the Agency should be responsible for
providing the Commission with recommendations in relation to drafting and
revising the TSIs, CSMs and CSTs. The national safety organisations and
regulatory bodies should be equally able to request an independent technical
opinion from the Agency.
(10)     Railway undertakings have
been faced with various problems when applying for safety certificates to
competent national authorities, ranging from protracting procedures and
excessive costs to unfair treatment, especially of new entrants. The
certificates issued in one Member State have not been unconditionally
recognised in other Member States, with a detriment to the Single European rail
area. In order to make the procedures for issuing safety certificates to
railway undertakings more efficient and impartial, it is essential to migrate
towards a single safety certificate valid throughout the Union and issued by
the Agency. The revised Directive … [Railway Safety Directive] provides a basis
for this. 
(11)     Currently Directive 2008/57/EC
provides, in the case of rail vehicles, an authorisation of placing in service
in each Member State, except in specific cases. The Task Force on vehicle
authorisation set up by the Commission in 2011 discussed several cases where
manufacturers and railway undertakings have suffered from excessive duration
and cost of the authorisation process and proposed a number of improvements. As
some problems are due to the complexity of the current vehicle authorisation process,
it should be simplified. Each rail vehicle should only receive one
authorisation and this authorisation for placing on the market for vehicles and
for types of vehicles should be issued by the Agency. This would bring tangible
benefits for the sector by reducing the costs and time of the procedure, and
would diminish the risk of potential discrimination, especially of new
companies wishing to enter a railway market. The revised Directive … [Railway Interoperability]
provides a basis for this. 
(12)     In order to further pursue
the development of Single European rail area, in particular with relation to
providing appropriate information to freight customers and passengers, and
taking into account current involvement of the Agency, it is necessary to give
it a strengthened role in the field of telematics applications. This would
ensure their consistent development and swift deployment.
(13)     Given the importance of the
European Rail Traffic Management System (ERTMS) for the smooth development of
the Single European railway area and its safety, and taking into account its
fragmented development to date, it is necessary to strengthen its s overall
coordination at the Union level. Therefore the Agency, as the most competent
Union body, should be given a more prominent role in this field to ensure
consistent development of the ERTMS, to contribute to ensuring that ERTMS
equipment complies with the specifications in force and to ensure that
ERTMS-related European research programmes are coordinated with the development
of ERTMS technical specifications. Moreover, in order to make the procedures
for issuing authorisations for placing in service of trackside control-command
and signalling sub-systems more efficient and impartial, it is essential to migrate
towards a single authorisation valid in the Union and issued by the Agency. The
revised Directive … [Railway Interoperability Directive] provides a basis for
this.
(14)     Competent national
authorities have been normally charging for issuing vehicle authorisations and safety
certificates. With the transfer competence to the Union level, the Agency
should be entitled to charge the applicants for issuing the certificates and
authorisations mentioned in the preceding recitals. The level of those charges
should be equal to or lower than the current average in the Union and should be
determined in a delegated act to be adopted by the Commission. 
(15)     It is a general objective
that the transfer of functions and tasks from the Member States to the Agency
should be done efficiently, without any reduction in the current high levels of
safety. The Agency should have sufficient resources for its new tasks, and the
timing of the allocation of these resources should be based on clearly defined
needs. Taking into account the know-how of national authorities, in particular
the National Safety Authorities, the Agency should be allowed to make
appropriate use of that expertise when granting the relevant authorisations and
certificates. To this end, secondment of national experts to the Agency should
be encouraged. 
(16)     Directive … [Railway
Safety] and Directive … [Railway Interoperability] provide for examination
of national measures from the point of view of safety and interoperability, and
compatibility with competition rules. They also limit the possibility for
Member States to adopt new national rules. The current system in which a large
number of national rules continue to exist leads to possible conflicts with Union
rules and creates a risk of insufficient transparency and disguised
discrimination of foreign operators, especially the smaller and new ones. In
order to migrate towards a system of truly, transparent and impartial railway rules
at Union level, gradual reduction of national rules needs to be reinforced. An
opinion based on independent and neutral expertise is essential at Union level.
To this end, the role of the Agency needs to be strengthened. 
(17)     Performance, organisation
and decision-making procedures in the field of railway interoperability and
safety vary substantially among the national safety authorities and notified conformity
assessment bodies, with a detrimental effect to smooth operation of the Single
European rail area. In particular, small and medium companies wishing to enter
the railway market in another Member State can be negatively affected.
Therefore, a strengthened coordination with a view to greater harmonisation at
the Union level is essential. To this end, the Agency should monitor the
national safety authorities and notified conformity assessment bodies through
audits and inspections. 
(18)     In the field of safety, it
is important to ensure the greatest possible transparency and an effective flow
of information. An analysis of performance, based on common indicators and
linking all parties in the sector, is important and should be carried out. As
regards statistics, close collaboration with Eurostat is necessary.
(19)     In order to monitor
progress with the railway interoperability and safety, the Agency should be
responsible for publishing a relevant report every two years. Given its
technical expertise and impartiality, the Agency should also assist the
Commission with monitoring the implementation of Union railway safety and
interoperability legislation. 
(20)     The interoperability of the
Trans-European network should be enhanced and the new investment projects
chosen for support by the Union should be in line with the objective of
interoperability set in Decision No 1692/96/EC of the European Parliament
and of the Council of 23 July 1996 on Community guidelines for the
development of the Trans-European transport network[8].
The Agency is the right institution to contribute to these objectives. 
(21)     Rolling stock maintenance
is an important part of the safety system. There has been no genuine European
market for the maintenance of rail equipment owing to the lack of a system for
certification of maintenance workshops. This situation has been adding to the
costs for the sector and results in journeys without loads. A European
certification system for maintenance workshops should therefore gradually be
developed and updated, with the Agency being the most appropriate body to
propose adequate solutions to the Commission.
(22)     The vocational qualifications
required for train drivers are a major factor in both safety and
interoperability in the Union. They are also a precondition for the free
movement of workers in the railway industry. This question should be tackled
with respect to the existing framework for social dialogue. The Agency should provide
the technical support necessary in order to take account of this aspect at Union
level.
(23)     The Agency should organise
and facilitate cooperation between the national safety authorities, the national
investigating bodies and representative bodies from the railway sector acting
on at European level, in order to promote good practices, exchange of relevant
information, collection of railway-related data and monitor the overall safety
performance of the railway system. 
(24)     In order to ensure the greatest
possible transparency and equal access for all parties to relevant information,
the documents envisaged for the railway interoperability and safety processes
should be accessible to the public. The same applies to licences, safety
certificates and other relevant railway documents. The Agency should provide an
efficient means of exchanging and publishing this information.
(25)     Promotion of innovation and
research in the railway field is an important task which the Agency should
encourage, given its reputation and position. Any financial assistance provided
within the framework of the Agency’s activities in this respect should not lead
to any distortion in the relevant market.
(26)     In order to increase the
efficiency of the Union financial support, its quality and compatibility with
relevant technical regulations, the Agency, as the only Union body with
reputable competence in the railway field, should play an active role in the assessment
of rail projects.
(27)     Railway interoperability
and safety legislation, implementation guides or recommendations of the Agency
may sometimes pose interpretation and other problems to the stakeholders.
Proper and uniform understanding of those acts is a precondition for effective
implementation of the railway acquis and the functioning of the railway market.
Therefore, the Agency should actively engage in training and explanatory
activities in that regard.
(28)     In order to perform its
tasks properly, the Agency should have legal personality and an autonomous
budget funded mainly through a contribution by the Union and through fees and
charges paid by applicants. In order to ensure independence in its daily
management and in the opinions, recommendations and decisions which it issues,
the Agency’s organisation should be transparent, the Executive Director should
have full responsibility. The Agency’s staff should be independent and should represent
an appropriate balance of short-term and long-term contracts, in order to
maintain its organisational knowledge and business continuity while keeping
necessary and on-going exchange of expertise with the railway sector.
(29)     In order to ensure
effectively the accomplishment of the functions of the Agency, the Member
States and the Commission should be represented on a Management Board vested
with the necessary powers, including to establish the budget and approve the annual
and multi-annual work programmes.
(30)     In order to guarantee the
transparency of the Management Board’s decisions, representatives of the
sectors concerned should attend its meetings, but without the right to vote,
that right being reserved for the representatives of public authorities who are
accountable to the democratic control authorities. The representatives of the
sector should be appointed by the Commission on the basis of their
representativeness at Union level of railway undertakings, infrastructure
managers, railway industry, workers unions, passengers and freight customers.
(31)     In order to properly
prepare the meetings of the Management Board and to advice it in relation to
the decisions to be taken, an advisory Executive Board should be created.
(32)     It is necessary to ensure
that parties affected by decisions made by the Agency enjoy the necessary
remedies in an independent and impartial manner. An appropriate appeal
mechanism should be set up so that decisions of the Executive Director can be
subject to appeal to a specialised Board of Appeal, whose decisions are, in
turn, open to action before the Court of Justice. 
(33)     A broader strategic
perspective in relation to the activities of the Agency would help to plan and
manage its resources more effectively and would contribute to higher quality of
its outputs. Therefore, a multi-annual work programme should be adopted and
updated regularly by the Management Board, after proper consultation of the
relevant stakeholders.
(34)     The Agency’s work should be
transparent. Effective control by the European Parliament should be ensured
and, to this end, the European Parliament should have the possibility of
hearing the Executive Director of the Agency and being consulted on the
multi-annual work programme. The Agency should also apply the relevant Union legislation
concerning public access to documents.
(35)     Over the past years, as
more decentralised agencies have been created, the budgetary authority has
looked to improve transparency and control over the management of the Union funding
allocated to them, in particular concerning the budgetisation of fees,
financial control, power of discharge, pension scheme contributions and the
internal budgetary procedure (code of conduct). In a similar way, Regulation
(EC) No 1073/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May
1999 concerning investigations conducted by the European Anti-Fraud Office
(OLAF)[9] should apply without
restriction to the Agency, which should accede to the Inter-institutional
Agreement of 25 May 1999 between the European Parliament, the Council of
the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities concerning
internal investigations by the European Anti-Fraud Office[10].
(36)     Since the objectives of the
action proposed, namely to establish a specialised body to formulate common
solutions on matters concerning railway safety and interoperability, cannot be
sufficiently achieved by the Member States by reason of the joint nature of the
work to be done, and can therefore be better achieved at Union level, the Union
may adopt measures in accordance with the principle of subsidiarity as set out
in Article 5 of the Treaty. In accordance with the principle of
proportionality as set out in that Article, this Regulation does not go beyond
what is necessary in order to achieve those objectives,
(37)     In order to properly
determine the level of fees and charges which the Agency is entitled to levy, the
power to adopt acts in accordance with Article 290 of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union should be delegated to the Commission in
respect of articles dealing with issuing and renewal of authorisations for
placing in service of trackside control-command and signalling subsystems,
authorisations for placing on the market for vehicles and for types of vehicles,
and safety certificates. It is of particular importance that the Commission
carry out appropriate consultations during its preparatory work, including at
expert level.         
The Commission, when preparing and drawing-up delegated acts, should ensure a
simultaneous, timely and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the
European Parliament and Council.
(38)     In order to ensure the
implementation of Articles 21 and 22 of this Regulation concerning examination
of draft national rules and rules in force, implementing powers should be
conferred on the Commission.
(39)     In order to ensure uniform
conditions for the implementation of Articles 29, 30, 31, and 51 of this
Regulation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission. Those
powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of
the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the rules and general
principles concerning mechanisms for control by the Member States of the
Commission's exercise of implementing powers.
(40)     It
is necessary to implement certain principles regarding the governance of the
Agency in order to comply with the Joint Statement and Common Approach agreed
by the Inter-Institutional Working Group on EU decentralised agencies in July
2012, the purpose of which is to streamline the activities of agencies and
increase their performance.
(41)     This Regulation respects
the fundamental rights and observes the principles recognised in particular by
the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
CHAPTER 1
PRINCIPLES
Article 1
Subject
matter and scope
1.           This Regulation
establishes a European Union Agency for Railways (the “Agency”).
2.           This Regulation provides
for:
(a)         
the establishment and tasks of the
Agency;
(b)         
the tasks of the Member States.
3.           This Regulation shall
apply to:
(a)         
interoperability within the Union rail system
provided for in Directive ../../.EU [Interoperability Directive];
(b)         
safety of the rail system within the Union
provided for in Directive ../../.EU [Railway safety Directive];
(c)         
certification of train drivers provided for in
Directive 2007/59/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23
October 2007 on the certification of train drivers operating locomotives and
trains on the railway system in the Community [Train Drivers Directive].
Article 2
Legal
status
1.           The Agency shall be a body
of the Union with legal personality.
2.           In each of the Member
States, the Agency shall enjoy the most extensive legal capacity accorded
to legal persons under their laws. It may in particular, acquire or
dispose of movable and immovable property and may be a party to
legal proceedings.
3.           The Agency shall be
represented by its Director.
Article 3
Types
of acts of the Agency
The Agency may:
(a)          address recommendations to the
Commission concerning the application of Articles 11, 13, 14, 15, 23, 24, 26,
30, 32, 31, 33 and 41;
(b)          address recommendations to Member
States concerning the application of Articles 21, 22 and 30; 
(c)          issue opinions to the Commission
pursuant to Articles 9, 21, 22 and 38, and to the authorities
concerned in the Member States pursuant to Article 9;
(d)          issue decisions pursuant to
Article 12, 16, 17, 18;
(e)          issue opinions constituting
acceptable means of compliance pursuant to Article 15; 
(f)           issue technical documents pursuant
to Article 15;
(g)          issue audit reports pursuant to
Articles 29 and 30;
(h)          issue guidelines and other
non-binding documents facilitating application of railway interoperability and
safety legislation pursuant to Articles 11, 15 and 24.
CHAPTER 2
WORKING METHODS
Article 4
Creation
and composition of the working parties
1.           The Agency shall set up a
limited number of working parties for drawing up recommendations, in particular
related to technical specifications for interoperability (TSIs), common safety
targets (CSTs) and common safety methods (CSMs). 
The Agency may set up working parties in other
duly justified cases at the request of the Commission or on its own initiative,
after having consulted the Commission. 
2.           The Agency shall appoint
experts to the working parties.
The Agency shall appoint to the working parties
representatives nominated by the competent national authorities for the working
parties in which they wish to participate.
The Agency shall appoint to the working parties
professionals from the railway sector from the list referred to in paragraph 3.
It shall ensure adequate representation of those sectors of the industry and of
those users which could be affected by measures the Commission may propose on
the basis of the recommendations addressed to it by the Agency.
The Agency may, if necessary, appoint to the
working parties independent experts and representatives of international
organisations recognised as competent
in the field concerned. Staff of the Agency may not be appointed to the working
parties.
3.           Each representative body
referred to in Article 34 shall forward to the Agency a list of the most
qualified experts mandated to represent them in each working party. 
4.           Whenever the work of such
working parties has a direct impact on the working conditions, health and
safety of workers in the industry, representatives from the workers’
organisations shall participate in the relevant working parties as full members.
5.           Travel and subsistence
expenses of the members of the working parties, based on rules and scales
adopted by the Management Board, shall be met by the Agency. 
6.           The working parties shall
be chaired by a representative of the Agency.
7.           The work of the working
parties shall be transparent. The Management Board shall lay down rules of procedure
of the working parties. 
Article 5
Consultation
of the social partners
Whenever the work provided for in Articles
11, 12, 15, and 32 has a direct impact on the social environment or working
conditions of workers in the industry, the Agency shall consult the social
partners within the framework of the sectoral dialogue committee set up pursuant
to Decision 98/500/EC[11].
These consultations shall be held before
the Agency submits its recommendations to the Commission. The Agency shall take
due account of these consultations, and shall, at all times, be available to
expound on its recommendations. The opinions expressed by the sectoral dialogue
committee shall be forwarded by the Agency to the Commission and by the
Commission to the committee referred to in Article 75.
Article 6
Consultation
of rail freight customers and passengers
Whenever the work provided for in
Articles 11 and 15 has a direct impact on rail freight customers and
passengers, the Agency shall consult the organisations representing them. The
list of organisations to be consulted shall be drawn up by the Commission with
the assistance of the committee referred to in Article 75.
These consultations shall be held before
the Agency submits its proposals to the Commission. The Agency shall take
due account of these consultations, and shall, at all times, be available to
expound on its proposals. The opinions expressed by the organisations concerned
shall be forwarded by the Agency to the Commission and by the Commission to the
committee referred to in Article 75.
Article 7
Impact
assessment
1.           The Agency shall conduct an
impact assessment of its recommendations and opinions. The Management Board
shall adopt impact assessment methodology based on the methodology of the
Commission. The Agency shall liaise with the Commission to ensure that relevant
work at the Commission is duly taken into account.
2.           Before launching an
activity included in the work programme, the Agency shall conduct an early
impact assessment in relation to it which shall state:
(a)         
the issue to be solved and likely solutions;
(b)         
the extent to which a specific action, including
issuing a recommendation or an opinion of the Agency, would be required;
(c)         
the expected Agency contribution to the solution
of the problem.
Moreover, each activity and project in the work
programme shall be subject to an efficiency analysis individually and in
conjunction with each other, to make best use of the budget and resources of
the Agency. 
3.           The Agency may conduct an
ex post assessment of the legislation resulting from its recommendations. 
4.           Member States shall
provide the Agency with the data necessary for the impact assessment. 
Article 8
Studies
Where required for the implementation of its
tasks, the Agency shall order studies and finance them from its budget.
Article 9
Opinions
1.           The Agency shall issue
opinions at request of the national regulatory bodies referred to in Article 55
of Directive 2012/34/EU [Directive establishing a Single European Rail Area (recast)]
concerning safety-related and interoperability-related aspects of matters drawn
to their attention.
2.           The Agency shall issue opinions
at request of the Commission on amendments to any act adopted on the basis of
Directive … [Interoperability Directive] or … [Railway Safety Directives],
especially where any alleged deficiency is signalled.
3.           With regard to opinions
referred to in previous paragraphs and in other articles of this Regulation, the
Agency shall give its opinions within two months, unless otherwise agreed. The opinions
shall be made public by the Agency within two months in a version from which
all commercially confidential material has been removed.
Article 10
Visits
to Member States
1.           The Agency may carry out
visits to the Member States in order to perform its tasks, in particular those referred
to in Articles 12, 21, 22, 16, 17, 27, 29, 30, 31 and 38, in accordance with
the policy defined by the Management Board. 
2.           The Agency shall inform
the Member State concerned of the planned visit, the names of the delegated
Agency officials, and the date on which the visit is to start. The Agency
officials delegated to carry out such visits shall do so on presentation of a
decision by the Executive Director specifying the purpose and the aims of their
visit.
3.           The national authorities
of the Member States shall facilitate the work of the Agency’s staff.
4.           The Agency shall draw up a
report on each visit and send it to the Commission and to the Member State
concerned.
5.           The preceding paragraphs
are without prejudice to inspections referred to in Articles 29 (6) and 30 (6) which
shall be pursued in accordance with the procedure described therein.
CHAPTER 3
TASKS RELATING TO RAILWAY SAFETY
Article 11
Technical
support - recommendations on railway safety
1.           The Agency shall issue recommendations
to the Commission on the Common Safety Methods (CSMs) and the Common Safety
Targets (CSTs) provided for in Articles 6 and 7 of Directive … [the Railway
Safety Directive]. The Agency shall also issue recommendations on periodic
revision of CSMs and CSTs to the Commission.
2.           The Agency shall issue recommendations
to the Commission, at the request of the Commission or on its own initiative, on
other measures in the field of safety
3.           The Agency may issue guidelines
and other non-binding documents to facilitate the implementation of railway
safety legislation.
Article 12
Safety
certificates
The Agency shall issue single safety
certificates in accordance with Articles 10 and 11 of Directive … [the Safety
Directive].
Article 13
Maintenance of vehicles
1.           The Agency shall assist the
Commission with regard to the system of certification of the entities in charge
of maintenance in accordance with Article 14 (6) of Directive … [Railway Safety
Directive].
2.           The Agency shall issue
recommendation to the Commission with a view of Article 14 (7) of Directive …
[Railway Safety Directive].
3.           The Agency shall analyse any
alternative measures decided in accordance with Article 15 of Directive… [Railway
Safety Directive] in the report referred to in Article 30 (2) of this
Regulation.
Article 14
Transport of dangerous goods by
rail
The Agency shall follow developments in the
legislation dealing with the transport of dangerous goods by rail within the
meaning of Directive 2008/68/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[12]
and compare them with the legislation dealing with rail interoperability and
safety, in particular the essential requirements. To this end the Agency shall
assist the Commission and may issue recommendations at the Commission’s request
or on its own initiative.
CHAPTER 4
TASKS RELATING TO INTEROPERABILITY
Article 15
Technical support in the field of railway
interoperability
1.           The Agency shall: 
(a)         
issue recommendations to the Commission on the
TSIs, and their revision, in accordance with Article 5 of Directive …
[Interoperability Directive]; 
(b)         
issue recommendations to the Commission on the
templates for the 'EU' declaration of verification and for documents of the
technical file that has to accompany it, in accordance with Article 15 of
Directive … [Interoperability Directive];
(c)         
issue recommendations to the Commission on
specifications for registers, and their revision, in accordance with Articles 43,
44 and 45 of Directive … [Interoperability Directive];
(d)         
issue opinions which constitute acceptable means
of compliance concerning TSI deficiencies, in accordance with Article 6(2) of
Directive … [ Interoperability Directive], and provide it to the Commission;
(e)         
issue opinions to the Commission regarding
requests for non-application of TSIs by Member States, in accordance with
Article 7 of Directive … [Interoperability Directive];
(f)           
issue technical documents in accordance with
Article 4(9) of Directive … [Interoperability Directive];
(g)         
issue recommendations to the Commission relating
to the working conditions of all staff carrying out safety-critical tasks.
2.           For drafting
recommendations referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) and (b), the Agency
shall:
(a)         
ensure that the TSIs and the specifications for
registers are adapted to technical progress and market trends and to social
requirements;
(b)         
ensure that the development and updating of the
TSIs on the one hand and the development of any European standards which prove
necessary for interoperability on the other, are coordinated and maintain the
relevant contacts with European standardisation bodies.
3.           The Agency may issue guidelines
and other non-binding documents to facilitate the implementation of railway
interoperability legislation.
Article 16
Authorisations for placing on the
market for vehicles 
The Agency shall issue authorisations for
placing on the market for railway vehicles in accordance with Article 20 of
Directive … [the Interoperability Directive]. 
Article 17
Authorisations for placing on the
market for types of vehicles
The Agency shall issue authorisations for
placing on the market for types of vehicles in accordance with Article 22 of
Directive … [the Interoperability Directive].
Article 18
Authorisations for placing in
service of trackside control-command and signalling sub-systems
The Agency shall issue authorisations for
placing in service of the trackside control-command and signalling subsystems
located or operated in the entire Union in accordance with Article 18 of
Directive … [the Interoperability Directive]. 
Article 19
Telematics applications 
1.           The Agency shall act as
the system authority, being responsible for maintaining the technical specifications
for the telematics applications, in accordance with relevant TSIs.
2.           The Agency shall define,
publish and apply the procedure for managing requests for changes to those
specifications. To this end, the Agency shall set up and maintain a register of
requests for changes to telematics applications specifications and their
status.
3.           The Agency shall develop
and maintain the technical tools for managing the different versions of the
telematics applications' specifications.
4.           The Agency shall assist
the Commission in the monitoring of deployment of telematics applications in
accordance with relevant TSIs. 
Article 20
Support for the notified conformity assessment bodies
1.           The Agency shall support
the activities of notified conformity assessment bodies referred to in Article 27
of Directive … [Interoperability Directive]. That support shall in particular include
drafting guidelines for assessing the conformity or suitability for use of an
interoperability constituent referred to in Article 9 of Directive … [Interoperability
Directive] and guidelines for the EC verification procedure referred to in
Article 10 of Directive … [Interoperability Directive]. 
2.           The Agency shall facilitate
cooperation of notified conformity assessment bodies, in particular act as the
technical secretariat for their coordination group. 
CHAPTER 5
TASKS RELATING TO NATIONAL RULES
Article 21
Examination of draft national rules

1.           The Agency shall, within
two months of their reception, examine the draft national rules submitted to it
in accordance with:
(a)         
Article 8(2) of Directive … [Railway Safety
Directive],
(b)         
Article 14 of Directive … [Interoperability
Directive].
2.           Where after the examination
referred to paragraph 1 the Agency considers that national rules enable the
essential requirements for interoperability to be fulfilled, CSMs to be
respected and the CSTs to be achieved, and that they would not result in
arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on rail transport operation
between Member States, the Agency shall inform the Commission and the Member
State concerned about its positive assessment. The Commission may validate the
rule in the IT system referred to in Article 23. 
3.           Where the examination
referred to in paragraph 1 leads to a negative assessment, the Agency shall:
(a)         
issue a recommendation addressed to the Member
State concerned stating the reasons why the rule in question should not entry
into force and/or be applied; 
(b)         
inform the Commission about its negative
assessment.
4.           Where no action was taken
by the Member State within 2 months after receiving the recommendation of the
Agency referred to in point (a) of paragraph 3, the Commission, after receiving
information referred to in point (b) of paragraph 3 and after having heard the
reasons of the Member State concerned, may adopt a decision addressed to the
Member State concerned requesting it to modify the draft rule in question,
suspend its adoption, entry into force or implementation.
Article 22
Examination
of national rules in force 
1.           The Agency shall, within
two months of their reception, examine national rules submitted to it in
accordance with Article 14(3) of Directive … [Interoperability Directive].
2.           Where after examination
referred to in paragraph 1 the Agency considers that national rules enable the
essential requirements for interoperability to be fulfilled, CSMs to be
respected and the CSTs to be achieved, and that they would not result in
arbitrary discrimination or a disguised restriction on rail transport operation
between Member States, the Agency shall inform the Commission and the Member
State concerned about its positive assessment. The Commission may validate the
rule in the IT system referred to in Article 23. 
3.           Where the examination
referred to in paragraph 1 leads to a negative assessment, the Agency shall:
(a)         
issue a recommendation addressed to the Member
State concerned stating the reasons why the rule in question should be modified
or repealed; 
(b)         
inform the Commission about its negative
assessment.
4.           Where no action was taken
by the Member State within 2 months after receiving the recommendation of the
Agency referred to in point (a) of paragraph 3, the Commission, after receiving
information referred to in point (b) of paragraph 3 and after having heard the
reasons of the Member State concerned, may adopt a decision addressed to the
Member State concerned requesting it to modify or repeal the rule in question.
5.           The procedure described in
paragraphs 2 and 3 shall apply, mutatis mutandis, in cases where the Agency
becomes aware of any national rule, notified or not, being redundant or in
conflict with the CSMs, CSTs, TSIs or any other Union legislation in the
railway field.
Article 23
IT
system to be used for notification purposes and classification of national
rules
1.           The Agency shall set up
and manage a dedicated IT system containing national rules referred to in
Articles 21(1) and 22(1) and make it accessible to stakeholders and the public.
2.           Member States shall notify
national rules referred to in Articles 21(1) and 22(1) to the Agency and to the
Commission through the IT system referred to in paragraph 1. The Agency shall publish
the rules in this system and use it for informing the Commission in accordance
with Articles 21 and 22.
3.           The Agency shall classify
notified national rules in accordance with Article 14(8) of Directive ….
[Interoperability Directive]. To this end, it shall use the system referred to
in the first paragraph of this Article.
4.           The
Agency shall classify national
rules notified in accordance with Article 8(2) of
Directive … [Railway Safety Directive], taking into account development of EU
legislation. To this end, the Agency shall develop a Rule Management Tool to be
used by Member States for simplifying their systems of national rules. The
Agency shall use the system referred to in the first paragraph of this Article
to publish the Rule Management Tool.
CHAPTER 6
Tasks Relating To European Rail Traffic Management
System (ERTMS)
Article 24
System authority for the ERTMS
1.           The Agency shall act as
the system authority, being responsible for maintaining the technical
specifications for the ERTMS.
2.           The Agency shall define,
publish and apply the procedure for managing requests for changes to those
specifications. To this end, the Agency shall set up and maintain a register of
requests for changes to ERTMS specifications and their status.
3.           The Agency shall recommend
the adoption of a new version of ERTMS Technical specifications. However, it
shall only do so when the previous version has been deployed at a sufficient
rate. The development of new versions shall not be detrimental to the rate of
deployment of the ERTMS, the stability of the specifications which is needed to
optimise the production of ERTMS equipment, the return on investment for
railway undertakings and efficient planning of the deployment of the ERTMS.
4.           The Agency shall develop
and maintain the technical tools for managing the different versions of the
ERTMS with a view to ensuring technical and operational compatibility between
networks and vehicles fitted with different versions and to providing
incentives for the swift implementation of the versions in force.
5.           In accordance with
Article 5(10) of Directive … [Railway Interoperability Directive], the
Agency shall ensure that successive versions of ERTMS equipment are technically
compatible with earlier versions.
6.           The Agency shall prepare
and disseminate relevant application guidelines for stakeholders and
explanatory documentation related to the technical specifications for the
ERTMS.
Article 25
ERTMS Ad hoc working group of notified conformity assessment bodies
1.           The Agency shall set up
and chair an ERTMS ad hoc working group of notified conformity assessment
bodies referred to in Article 27 of Directive … [Interoperability Directive]. 
The working group shall check the consistency
of application of the procedure for assessing the conformity or suitability for
use of an interoperability constituent referred to in Article 9 of Directive …
[Interoperability Directive] and of the 'EC' procedures for verification
referred to in Article 10 of Directive … [Interoperability Directive] and
carried out by notified conformity assessment bodies.
2.           The Agency shall report
every two years to the Commission on the activities of the working group
referred to in paragraph 1, including statistics on attendance of notified conformity
assessment bodies’ representatives in the working group.
3.           The Agency shall evaluate
the application of the procedure for conformity assessment of interoperability
constituents and of the 'EC' verification procedure for ERTMS equipment and
every two years shall submit a report proposing to the Commission, where
appropriate, improvements to be made.
Article 26
Supporting technical and operational compatibility between ERTMS
on-board and trackside subsystems
1.           The Agency may assist the
railway undertakings, at their request, in checking the technical and
operational compatibility between ERTMS on-board and trackside subsystems
before placing a vehicle in service. 
2.           Where the Agency finds
that there is a risk of a lack of technical and operational compatibility
between networks and vehicles fitted with ERTMS equipment in the context of
specific ERTMS projects, it may request the appropriate actors, in particular manufacturers,
notified conformity assessment bodies, railway undertakings, infrastructure
managers and national safety authorities, to provide any information relevant
to the procedures applied for 'EC' verification and placing in service, and to
operational conditions. The Agency shall inform the Commission about such a
risk and, if necessary, recommend appropriate measures to the Commission.
Article 27
Supporting ERTMS deployment and ERTMS projects
1.           The Agency shall monitor
the deployment of the ERTMS in accordance with the deployment plan set out in
Decision 2012/88/EU[13] and shall monitor
coordination of ERTMS installation along the Trans-European Transport Corridors
and Rail Freight Corridors as provided for in Regulation (EU) No 913/2010[14].
2.           The Agency shall ensure
technical follow up of Union-funded projects for the deployment of the ERTMS,
including, where applicable, analysis of tendering documents at the time of the
call for tenders. The Agency shall also assist, if necessary, the beneficiaries
of the Union funds to ensure that the technical solutions implemented within
projects are fully compliant with the TSIs relating to control-command and
signalling and are therefore fully interoperable.
Article 28
Accreditation of laboratories
1.           The Agency shall support,
in particular by giving appropriate guidelines to the accreditation bodies,
harmonised accreditation of ERTMS laboratories in
accordance with Regulation (EC) No 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of
the Council[15].
2.           The Agency may participate
as an observer in the peer reviews required by Regulation
(EC) No 765/2008.
CHAPTER 7
TASKS RELATING TO MONITORING THE SINGLE EUROPEAN
RAILWAY AREA
Article 29
Monitoring
of national safety authorities
1.           The Agency shall monitor
the performance and decision-making of national safety authorities through
audit and inspections.
2.           The Agency shall be
entitled to audit:
(a)         
the capacity of national safety authorities to
execute tasks related to railway safety and interoperability;
(b)         
the effectiveness of national safety authorities'
monitoring of safety management systems of actors as referred to in Article 16
in Directive […] [Railway Safety Directive]. 
The procedure for performing the audits shall
be adopted by the Management Board.
3.           The Agency shall issue audit
reports and send them to the national safety authority concerned and to the
Commission. Each audit report shall include, in particular, a list of any
deficiencies identified by the Agency as well as recommendations for
improvement. 
4.           If the Agency considers
that the deficiencies referred to in paragraph 3 prevent the national safety
authority concerned from effectively performing its tasks in relation to
railway safety and interoperability, the Agency shall recommend to the national
safety authority to take appropriate steps within a time limit to be defined
taking into account the importance of the deficiency.
5.           Where a national safety
authority disagrees with the Agency's recommendation referred to in paragraph 4,
or where no action is taken by a national safety authority as a result of the
Agency's recommendation within 3 months from its reception, the Commission may take
a decision within six months in accordance with the advisory procedure referred
to in Article 75.
6.           The Agency shall be also entitled
to conduct announced or unannounced inspections in national safety authorities,
to verify specific areas of their activities and operation, in particular
review documents, processes and records related to their tasks referred to in
Article 16 of Directive … [Railway Safety Directive]. The inspections may be
conducted on an ad-hoc basis or in accordance with a plan developed by the
Agency. The duration of an inspection shall not exceed two days. The national
authorities of the Member States shall facilitate the work of the Agency’s
staff. The Agency shall provide the Commission with a report on each
inspection. 
Article 30
Monitoring
of notified conformity assessment bodies
1.           The Agency shall monitor
the notified conformity assessment bodies through assistance to accreditation
bodies, audit and inspections, as provided for in paragraphs 2-5.
2.           The Agency shall support
harmonised accreditation of notified conformity assessment bodies, in
particular by giving appropriate guidance on evaluation criteria and procedures
to assess whether notified bodies meet the requirements referred to in Art. 27
of Directive … [Interoperability Directive] to the accreditation bodies, via
the European Accreditation infrastructure recognised by Art. 14 of Regulation
(EC) No. 765/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council setting out the
requirements for accreditation and market surveillance relating to the
marketing of products and repealing Regulation (EEC) No. 339/93
3.           In case of notified conformity
assessment bodies which are not accredited according to Article 24 of Directive…
[Interoperability Directive], the Agency may audit their capacities to meet the
requirements referred to in Article 27 of that Directive. The procedure for
performing audits shall be adopted by the Management Board.
4.           The Agency shall issue audit
reports covering the activities referred to in paragraph 3 and send them to the
notified conformity assessment body concerned and to the Commission. Each audit
report shall include, in particular, any deficiencies identified by the Agency
and recommendations for improvement. If the Agency considers that these
deficiencies prevent the notified body concerned from effectively performing
its tasks in relation to railway safety and interoperability, the Agency shall adopt
a recommendation requesting the Member State in which that notified body is
established to take appropriate steps within a time limit.
5.           Where a Member State
disagrees with the recommendation referred to in paragraph 4, or where no
action is taken by a notified body as a result of the Agency's recommendation
within 3 months from its reception, the Commission may adopt an opinion within
a period of six months in accordance with advisory procedure referred to in
Article 75.
6.           The Agency may, including
in cooperation with the relevant national accreditation bodies, conduct
announced or unannounced inspections of notified conformity assessment bodies to
verify specific areas of their activities and operation, in particular review
documents, certificates and records related to their tasks referred to in
Article 27 of Directive […] [Interoperability Directive]. The inspections may
be conducted on an ad-hoc basis or in accordance with a plan developed by the
Agency. The duration of an inspection shall not exceed two days. The notified
conformity assessment bodies shall facilitate the work of the Agency’s staff.
The Agency shall provide the Commission with a report on each inspection. 
Article 31
Monitoring
progress of interoperability and safety
1.           The Agency, together with
the network of national investigation bodies, shall collect relevant data on accidents
and incidents and monitor the contribution of the national investigation bodies
to the safety of the railway system as a whole.
2.           The Agency shall monitor
the overall safety performance of the railway system. The Agency may in
particular seek the assistance of the networks referred to in Article 34,
including collection of data. The Agency shall also draw on the data collected
by Eurostat and shall cooperate with Eurostat to prevent any duplication of
work and to ensure methodological consistency between the common safety
indicators and the indicators used in other modes of transport.
3.           At the Commission’s request,
the Agency shall issue recommendations on how to improve the interoperability
of the railway systems, in particular by facilitating coordination between
railway undertakings and infrastructure managers, or between infrastructure
managers.
4.           The Agency shall monitor
progress on the interoperability and safety of the railway systems. Every two
years it shall present to the Commission and publish a report on progress on interoperability
and safety in the Single European Railway Area.
5.           The Agency shall, at the
Commission’s request, provide reports on the state of implementation and
application of the Union legislation on safety and interoperability in a given
Member State.
CHAPTER 8
OTHER TASKS
Article 32
Railway
staff
1.           The Agency shall perform
the appropriate tasks relating to railway staff set out in Articles 4, 20, 22,
23, 25, 28, 33, 34, 35 and 37 of Directive 2007/59/EC of the European
Parliament and of the Council[16] .
2.           The Agency may be
requested by the Commission to perform other tasks relating to railway staff in
accordance with Directive 2007/59/EC.
3.           The Agency shall consult
the authorities competent on railway staff issues on the tasks referred to in
paragraphs 1 and 2. The Agency may promote cooperation between those
authorities, including by organising appropriate meetings with their representatives.
Article 33
Registers
and their accessibility
1.           The Agency shall set up
and keep European registers provided for in Article 43, 44 and 45 of Directive …
[Interoperability Directive]. The Agency shall act as the system authority for
all registers and databases referred to in the Safety, Interoperability and
Train Drivers Directives. This shall include, in particular:
(a)         
developing and maintaining specifications of the
registers;
(b)         
coordinating of developments in the Member
States in relation to the registers;
(c)         
providing guidance on the registers to relevant
stakeholders;
(d)         
making recommendations to the Commission
regarding improvements to the specification of existing registers and any need
to set up new ones.
2.           The Agency shall make the
following documents and registers provided for by Directive … [Interoperability
Directive] and Directive … [Railway Safety Directive] publicly available:
(a)         
the EC declarations of verification of
subsystems;
(b)         
the EC declarations of conformity of
interoperability constituents and EC declarations of suitability of
use of interoperability constituents;
(c)         
the licences issued in accordance with Directive
… [Directive on the establishment of the Single European Rail Area (recast)];
(d)         
the safety certificates issued in accordance
with Article 10 of Directive … [Railway Safety Directive];
(e)         
the investigation reports sent to the Agency in
accordance with Article 24 of Directive … [Railway Safety Directive];
(f)           
the national rules notified to the Commission in
accordance with Article 8 of Directive … [Railway Safety Directive] and
Articles 14 of Directive … [Interoperability Directive];
(g)         
the vehicle registers, including via links to
relevant national registers;
(h)         
the infrastructure registers, including via links
to relevant national registers;
(i)           
the European register of authorised types of
vehicles;
(j)           
the register of requests for changes and planned
changes to the ERTMS specifications;
(k)         
the register of requests for changes and planned
changes to the Telematics Applications for Passengers (TAP) TSI/Telematics Applications
for Freight (TAF) TSI specifications;
(l)           
the register of vehicle keeper markings kept by
the Agency in accordance with the TSI on operation and traffic management;
(m)       
quality reports issued in accordance with
Article 28(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1371/2007.
3.           The practical arrangements
for sending the documents referred to in paragraph 2 shall be discussed
and agreed by the Commission and the Member States on the basis of a draft prepared
by the Agency.
4.           When sending the documents
referred to in paragraph 2, the bodies concerned may indicate which
documents are not to be disclosed to the public for reasons of security.
5.           The national authorities
responsible for issuing the licences and certificates referred to in points (c)
and (d) of paragraph 2 shall notify the Agency within one month of each
individual decision to issue, renew, amend or revoke those licenses and
certificates.
6.           The Agency may include any
public document or link relevant to the objectives of this Regulation in the
public database, taking into account applicable Union legislation on data
protection.
Article 34
Networks
of national safety authorities, investigating bodies and representative bodies
1.           The Agency shall establish
a network of the national safety authorities and a network of the investigating
bodies referred to in Article 21 of Directive…/… [Railway Safety
Directive]. The Agency shall provide them with a secretariat. The tasks of the
networks shall, in particular, be:
(a)         
exchange of information related to railway
safety and interoperability;
(b)         
promotion of good practices;
(c)         
provision of data on railway safety to the
Agency, in particular data relating to common safety indicators.
The Agency shall facilitate cooperation between
those networks, in particular it may decide to hold joint meetings of both
networks.
2.           The Agency shall establish
a network of representative bodies from the railway sector acting at the Union
level. The list of these bodies shall be defined in an implementing act adopted
by the Commission, in accordance with advisory procedure referred to in Article
75. The Agency shall provide the network with a secretariat. The tasks of the
network shall, in particular, be:
(a)         
exchange of information related to railway
safety and interoperability;
(b)         
promotion of good practices;
(c)         
provision of data on railway safety and
interoperability to the Agency. 
3.           The networks referred to
in paragraphs 1 and 2 may issue non-binding opinions on draft recommendations
referred to in Article 9(2). 
4.           The Agency may establish
other networks with bodies or authorities with responsibility for a part of the
railway system.
5.           The Commission may
participate in meetings of networks referred to in this Article.
Article 35
Communication
and dissemination
The Agency shall communicate and disseminate
to relevant stakeholders the European framework of railway legislation,
standards and guidance, in accordance with relevant communication and
dissemination plans adopted by the Management Board. Those plans, based on an
analysis of needs, shall be regularly updated by the Management Board. 
Article 36
Research
and promotion of innovation
1.           The Agency shall
contribute, upon request of the Commission, to railway research activities at Union
level, including through support to relevant Commission services and representative
bodies. This contribution shall be without prejudice to other research
activities at the Union level.
2.           The Commission may entrust
the Agency with the task of promoting innovation aimed at improving railway
interoperability and safety, particularly the use of new information
technologies and tracking and tracing systems.
Article 37
Assistance to the Commission
1.           The Agency shall, at the Commission’s
request, assist the Commission with the implementation of Union legislation
aimed at enhancing the level of interoperability of railway systems and at
developing a common approach to safety on the European railway system.
2.           This assistance may include:
(a)         
providing technical advice in matters requiring
specific know-how;
(b)         
collecting information through the networks
referred to in Article 34.
Article 38
Assistance
with the assessment of rail projects
Without prejudice to the derogations
provided for by Article 9 of Directive […] [Railway Interoperability
Directive], the Agency shall, at the Commission’s request, examine, from the
point of view of interoperability and safety, any project involving the design,
construction, renewal or upgrading of the subsystem for which an application
for Union financial support has been submitted. 
Within a period to be agreed with the
Commission according to the importance of the project and the resources
available and which may not exceed two months, the Agency shall give an opinion
on whether the project complies with the relevant railway interoperability and
safety legislation.
Article 39
Assistance
to Member States, candidate countries and stakeholders
1.           On its own initiative or
at the request of the Commission, Member States, candidate countries or the
networks referred to in Article 34, the Agency shall engage in training and
other appropriate activities concerning the application and explanation of
railway interoperability and safety legislation and related Agency’s products
such as registers, implementation guides or recommendations.
2.           The nature and extent of
the activities referred to in paragraph 1 shall be decided by the Board and
included in the work programme.
Article 40
International
relations
1.           In so far as is necessary
to achieve the objectives set out in this Regulation and without prejudice to
the respective competences of the Member States and the Union institutions,
including the European External Action Service, the Agency may develop contacts
and enter into administrative arrangements with supervisory authorities,
international organisations and the administrations of third countries
competent in matters covered by Agency activities in order to keep up with
scientific and technical developments and to ensure promotion of the European
Union railways legislation and standards. 
2.           Those arrangements shall
not create legal obligations in respect of the Union and its Member States nor
shall they prevent Member States and their competent authorities from
concluding bilateral or multilateral arrangements with those supervisory
authorities, international organisations and the administrations of third
countries. Those arrangements and cooperation shall be subject to prior
discussion with the Commission and regular reporting to it.
3.           The Management Board shall
adopt a strategy for relations with third countries or international organisations
concerning matters for which the Agency is competent. This strategy shall be included
in the annual and multi-annual work programme of the Agency, with a
specification of associated resources.
Article 41
Coordination
regarding spare parts
The Agency shall contribute to identifying
potential railway spare parts to be standardised. To this end, the Agency may establish
a working party in order to coordinate the stakeholders’ activities and may
establish contacts with the European standardisation bodies. The Agency shall
present the Commission with appropriate recommendations.
CHAPTER 9
ORGANISATION OF THE AGENCY 
Article 42
Administrative and management structure
The Agency's administrative and management structure shall comprise:
(a)                   
A Management Board, which shall exercise the
functions set out in Article 47;
(b)                   
An Executive Board which shall exercise the
functions set out in Article 49;
(c)                   
An Executive Director who shall exercise the
responsibilities set out in Article 50;
(d)                   
A Board of Appeal who shall exercise the
responsibilities set out in Articles 54 to 56.
Article 43
Composition
of the Management Board
1.           The Management Board
shall be composed of one representative from each Member State and four
representatives of the Commission, all with a right to vote. 
The Management Board shall also include six
representatives, without the right to vote, representing at European level the
following groups:
(a)         
railway undertakings;
(b)         
infrastructure managers;
(c)         
the railway industry;
(d)         
trade unions;
(e)         
passengers;
(f)           
freight customers.
For each of these groups, the Commission shall
appoint a representative and an alternate from a shortlist of four names
submitted by their respective European organisations.
2.           Board members and their
alternates shall be appointed in light of their knowledge of the agency's
core business, taking into account relevant managerial, administrative and
budgetary skills. All parties shall make efforts to limit turnover of their
representatives in the Board, in order to ensure continuity of the Board's
work. All parties shall aim to achieve a balanced representation between men
and women on the Management Board.
3.           Member States and the
Commission shall appoint their members of the Management Board and an
alternate who will represent the member in his/her absence.
4.           The term of office of the members
shall be four years and may be renewed.
5.           When appropriate, the
participation of representatives of third countries and the conditions thereof
shall be established in the arrangements referred to in Article 68.
Article 44
Chairperson
of the Management Board
1.           The Management Board
shall elect, by a two-thirds majority of its members entitled to vote, a
Chairperson from among the representatives of the Member States and a
Deputy Chairperson from among its members. 
The Deputy Chairperson shall replace the
Chairperson in the event of the Chairperson being unable to attend to his/her
duties.
2.           The term of office of the
Chairperson and Deputy Chairperson shall be four years and may be renewed. If,
however, their membership of the Management Board ends at any time during their
term of office, their term of office shall automatically expire on that date
also.
Article 45
Meetings
1.           Meetings of the Management
Board shall be convened by its Chairperson. The Executive Director of the
Agency shall participate in the meetings.
2.           The Management Board
shall meet at least twice a year. It shall also meet on the initiative of the
Chairperson, at the request of the Commission, at the request of the majority
of its members or of one-third of the Member States’ representatives on the
Board.
Article 46
Voting
Unless stated otherwise in this Regulation,
the Management Board shall take its decisions by an absolute majority of its
members entitled to vote. Each member entitled to vote shall have one vote.
Article 47
Functions
of the Management Board
1.           In order to ensure that
the Agency carries out its tasks, the Management Board shall:
(a)         
adopt the Annual Report on the Agency's
activities for the previous year, send it, by 1 July, to the European
Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the Court of Auditors and make it
public;
(b)         
adopt each year, by a two-thirds majority of its
members entitled to vote, after having received the opinion of the Commission
and in accordance with Article 48, the annual work programme of the Agency for
the coming year and a strategic multi-annual work programme;
(c)         
adopt, by a two-thirds majority of its members
entitled to vote, the annual budget of the Agency and exercise other functions
in relation to the Agency’s budget, in accordance with Chapter 10;
(d)         
establish procedures for decision-making by the
Executive Director;
(e)         
adopt a policy on visits pursuant to
Article 10;
(f)           
establish its rules of procedure;
(g)         
adopt and update the communication and dissemination
plans referred to in Article 35;
(h)         
adopt procedures for performing the audits
referred to in Articles 29 and 30;
(i)           
in accordance with paragraph 2, exercise, with
respect to the staff of the Agency, the appointing authority powers conferred
by the Staff Regulations on the Appointing Authority and by the Conditions of
Employment of Other Servants on the Authority Empowered to Conclude Contract of
Employment ("the appointing authority powers");
(j)           
adopt appropriate implementing rules to the
Staff Regulations and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants in
accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 110 of the Staff
Regulations;
(k)         
appoint the Executive Director and may extend
his term of office or remove him from the office, by a two-thirds majority of
its members entitled to vote, in accordance with Article 62;
(l)           
adopt an anti-fraud strategy, which is
proportionate to the fraud risks having regard to cost-benefit of the measures
to be implemented;
(m)       
ensure adequate follow-up to the findings and
recommendations stemming from investigations of the European Anti-fraud Office
(OLAF) and the various internal or external audit reports and evaluations;
(n)         
adopt rules for the prevention and management of
conflicts of interest in respect of members of the Management Board and of the
Board of Appeal. 
2.           The Management Board shall
adopt, in accordance with the procedure provided for in Article 110 of the
Staff Regulations, a decision based on Article 2(1) of the Staff Regulations
and on Article 6 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants delegating
the relevant appointing authority powers to the Executive Director and defining
the conditions under which this delegation of powers can be suspended. The
Executive Director is authorised to sub-delegate these powers.
In application of the previous subparagraph, where
exceptional circumstances so require, the Management Board may, by way of a
decision, suspend temporarily the delegation of appointing authority powers to
the Executive Director and those sub-delegated by the latter and exercise them
itself or delegate them to one of its members or to a staff member other than
the Executive Director.
Article 48
Annual
and multi-annual work programmes
1.           The Board of the Agency
shall adopt the work programme by 30 November each year, taking into
account the opinion of the Commission, and forward it to the Member States, the
European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and to the networks referred
to in Article 34.
2.           The work programme shall
be adopted without prejudice to the Union’s annual budgetary procedure. If,
within 15 days of the date of adoption of the work programme, the Commission
expresses its disagreement with the programme, the Management Board shall
re-examine the programme and adopt it, as amended if necessary, within a period
of two months, in second reading either by a two-thirds majority of its members
entitled to vote, including by all Commission representatives, or by unanimity
of the representatives of the Member States.
3.           The Agency’s work programme
shall identify the objectives of each activity. As a general rule, each
activity and project shall be clearly linked with the resources required to
carry it out, in accordance with the principles of activity-based budgeting and
management and the early impact assessment procedure provided for in paragraph
2 of Article 7. 
4.           The Management Board shall,
if necessary, amend the adopted work programme when a new task is given to the
Agency. Inclusion of such a new task shall be subject to an analysis of the human
and budgetary resources implications and may be subject to a decision to
postpone other tasks.
5.           The Management Board shall
also adopt and update a strategic multi-annual work programme by
30 November each year. The opinion of the Commission shall be taken into
account. The European Parliament and the networks referred to in Article 34 shall
be consulted on the draft. The adopted multi-annual work programme shall be
forwarded to the Member States, the European Parliament, the Council, the
Commission and to the networks referred to in Article 34. 
Article 49
Executive
Board 
1.           The Management Board shall
be assisted by an Executive Board.
2.           The Executive Board shall
prepare decisions to be adopted by the Management Board. Where necessary,
because of urgency, it shall take certain provisional decisions on behalf of
the Management Board, in particular on administrative and budgetary matters.
Together with the Management Board, it shall
ensure adequate follow-up to the findings and recommendations stemming from
investigations of OLAF and the various internal or external audit reports and
evaluations.
Without prejudice to the responsibilities of
the Executive Director, as set out in Article 30, it shall assist and advise
him/her in the implementation of the decisions of the Management Board, with a
view to reinforcing supervision of administrative and budgetary management.
3.           The Executive Board shall
be composed of the Chairperson of the Management Board, one representative of
the Commission and [four] other members of the Management Board. The Management
Board shall appoint members of the Executive Board and its chairperson. 
4.           The term of office of
members of the Executive Board shall be the same as that of members of the
Management Board. 
5.           The Executive Board shall
meet at least once every three months. The chairperson of the Executive Board
shall convene additional meetings at the request of its members. 
6.           The Management Board shall
lay down the rules of procedures of the Executive Board.
Article 50
Duties
of the Executive Director
1.           The Agency shall be
managed by its Executive Director, who shall be completely independent in the
performance of his/her duties. The Executive Director shall be accountable to
the Management Board for his/her activities.
2.           Without prejudice to the
powers of the Commission, the Management Board, or the Executive Board, the
Executive Director shall neither seek nor take instructions from any government
or from any other body.
3.           The Executive Director
shall report to the European Parliament on the performance of his/her duties
when invited. The Council may invite the Executive Director to report on the
performance of his/her duties.
4.           The Executive Director
shall be the legal representative of the Agency. He/she shall adopt decisions,
recommendations, opinions and other formal acts of the Agency.
5.           The Executive Director
shall be responsible for the administrative management of the Agency and for
the implementation of the tasks assigned to it by this Regulation. In particular,
the Executive Director shall be responsible for:
(a)         
the day-to-day administration of the Agency;
(b)         
implementing the decisions adopted by the
Management Board;
(c)         
preparing the annual work programme and
strategic multi-annual work programme and, submit them to the Management Board
after consultation of the Commission;
(d)         
implementing the annual work programme and the
strategic multi-annual work programme and as far as possible, responding to
requests for assistance from the Commission in relation to the tasks of the
Agency in accordance with this Regulation;
(e)         
reporting to the Management Board on the
implementation of the strategic multi-annual work programme;
(f)           
taking the necessary steps, in particular the
adoption of internal administrative instructions and the publication of orders,
to ensure that the Agency operates in accordance with this Regulation;
(g)         
establishing an effective monitoring system in
order to compare the Agency's results with its operational objectives and
establishing a regular assessment system corresponding to recognised
professional standards;
(h)         
preparing each year a draft general report on
the basis of the monitoring and assessment systems referred to in point (g), and
submitting it to the Management Board;
(i)           
preparing the Agency's draft statement of
estimates of the revenue and expenditure of the Agency pursuant to
Article 58 and implementing the budget pursuant to Article 59;
(j)           
preparing the annual report on the Agency's
activities and presenting it to the Management Board for assessment;
(k)         
preparing an action plan following-up on the
conclusions of the retrospective evaluations and reporting on progress
bi-annually to the Commission;
(l)           
protecting the financial interests of the Union
by the application of preventive measures against fraud, corruption and any
other illegal activities, by effective checks and, if irregularities are
detected, by the recovery of the amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate,
by effective, proportionate and dissuasive administrative and financial
penalties;
(m)       
preparing an anti-fraud strategy of the Agency
and presenting it to the Management Board for approval;
(n)         
preparing the Agency's draft financial
regulation for adoption by the Management Board under Article 60, and its
implementing rules.
Article 51
Creation
and composition of the Boards of Appeal
1.           The Agency shall establish
one or more Boards of Appeal.
2.           A Board of Appeal shall be
composed of a Chairperson and two other members. They shall have alternates to
represent them in their absence.
3.           The Management Board shall
appoint the Chairperson, the other members and their alternates from a list of
qualified candidates established by the Commission.
4.           Where the Board of Appeal
considers that the nature of the appeal so requires, it may request the
Management Board to appoint two additional members and their alternates from
the list referred to in paragraph 3.
5.           On the proposal of the
Agency, the Commission shall establish the rules of procedure of the Board of
Appeal, after having consulted the Management Board and in accordance with the advisory
procedure referred to in Article 75.
Article 52
Members
of the Board of Appeal
1.           The term of office of the
members and alternates of a Board of Appeal shall be four years and may be
renewed.
2.           The members of a Board of
Appeal shall be independent and may not perform any other duties within the
Agency. In making their decisions they shall not be bound by any instructions.
3.           The members of a Board of
Appeal may not be removed from office or from the list of qualified candidates
during their term of office, unless there are serious grounds for such removal
and the Commission, after obtaining the opinion of the Management Board takes a
decision to that effect.
Article 53
Exclusion
and objection
1.           The members of the Board
of Appeal may not take part in any appeal proceedings if they have any personal
interest in the proceedings, if they have previously been involved as
representatives of one of the parties to the proceedings, or if they
participated in the decision under appeal.
2.           Members of the Board of
Appeal who consider that they should not take part in any appeal proceeding, for
one of the reasons referred to in paragraph 1 or for any other reason, shall
inform the Board of Appeal which decides on the exclusion accordingly.
Article 54
Decisions
subject to appeal
1.           An appeal may be brought before
the Board of Appeal against decisions taken by the Agency pursuant to Articles 12,
16, 17 and 18. 
2.           An appeal lodged pursuant
to paragraph 1 shall not have a suspensory effect. The Agency may, however,
suspend the application of the decision appealed against, if it considers that
circumstances so permit.
Article 55
Persons
entitled to appeal, time limit and form
1.           Any natural or legal
person may appeal against a decision addressed to that person by the Agency
pursuant to Articles 12, 16, 17 and 18. 
2.           The appeal, together with
the statement of grounds thereof, shall be filed in writing at the Agency
within two months of the notification of the measure to the person concerned,
or, if the person is not notified of the measure, within two months of the day
on which it came to their knowledge.
Article 56
Examination
and decisions on appeals
1.           When examining the appeal,
the Board of Appeal shall act expeditiously. It shall, as often as necessary,
invite the parties to the appeal proceedings to file, within specified time
limits, observations on its notifications or on communications from other
parties to the appeal proceedings. Parties to the appeal proceedings shall be
entitled to make oral presentations.
2.           The Board of Appeal may
exercise appropriate power which lies within the competence of the Agency or
may remit the case to the competent body of the Agency. The latter shall be
bound by the decision of the Board of Appeal.
Article 57
Actions
before the Court of Justice
1.           Actions for the annulment
of Agency decisions taken pursuant to Articles 12, 16, 17 and 18 may be brought
before the Court of Justice of the European Union only after all appeal
procedures within the Agency have been exhausted.
2.           The Agency shall take all
necessary measures to comply with the judgment of the Court of Justice of the
European Union.
CHAPTER 10
FINANCIAL PROVISIONS
Article 58
Budget
1.           Estimates of all the
revenue and expenditure of the Agency shall be prepared for each financial
year, corresponding to the calendar year, and shall be set out in the budget of
the Agency. Revenue and expenditure shall be in balance.
2.           The revenue of the Agency
shall consist of:
(a)         
a contribution from the Union,
(b)         
any contribution from third countries
participating in the work of the Agency, as provided for by Article 68,
(c)         
the fees paid by applicants for, and holders of,
certificates and authorisations issued by the Agency in accordance with
Articles 12, 16, 17 and 18;
(d)         
charges for publications, training and any other
services provided by the Agency;
(e)         
any voluntary financial contribution from Member
States, third countries or other entities, provided such a contribution does
not compromise the independence and impartiality of the Agency.
3.           The expenditure of the
Agency shall include staff, administrative, infrastructure and operational
expenses.
4.           Revenue and expenditure
shall be in balance.
5.           Each year, the Management Board,
on the basis of a draft drawn up by the Executive Director on the basis of
activity-based budgeting, shall produce a statement of estimates of revenue and
expenditure for the Agency for the following financial year. This statement of
estimates, which shall include a draft establishment plan, shall be forwarded
by the Management Board to the Commission by 31 January at the latest.
6.           The statement of estimates
shall be forwarded by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council
(hereinafter referred to as the budgetary authority) together with the
preliminary draft general budget of the Union.
7.           On the basis of the
statement of estimates, the Commission shall enter in the preliminary draft
general budget of the Union the estimates it considers necessary for the
establishment plan and the amount of the subsidy to be charged to the general
budget, which it shall place before the budgetary authority in accordance with
Article 314 of the Treaty, together with a description of and justification for
any difference between the Agency's statement of estimates and the subsidy to
be charged to the general budget.
8.           The budgetary authority
shall authorise the appropriations for the subsidy to the Agency. The budgetary
authority shall adopt the establishment plan for the Agency.
9.           The budget shall be
adopted by the Management Board, by a two-thirds majority of its members
entitled to vote. The Budget of the Agency shall become final following final
adoption of the general budget of the Union. Where appropriate, it shall be
adjusted accordingly.
10.         The Management Board
shall notify the budgetary authority as soon as possible of its intention to
implement any project which may have significant financial implications for the
funding of the budget, in particular any projects relating to property such as
the rental or purchase of buildings. It shall inform the Commission thereof.
Where a branch of the budgetary authority has notified its intention to deliver
an opinion on the project, it shall forward its opinion to the Management Board
within six weeks after the date of notification of the project.
Article 59
Implementation
and control of the budget
1.           The Executive Director
shall implement the budget of the Agency.
2.           By 1 March at the
latest following each financial year, the Agency’s accounting officer shall
communicate the provisional accounts to the Commission’s accounting officer
together with a report on the budgetary and financial management for that
financial year. The Commission’s accounting officer shall consolidate the
provisional accounts of the institutions and decentralised bodies in accordance
with Article 147 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (the general
Financial Regulation).
3.           By 31 March at the
latest following each financial year, the Commission’s accounting officer shall
forward the Agency’s provisional accounts to the Court of Auditors, together
with a report on the budgetary and financial management for that financial
year. The report on the budgetary and financial management for the financial
year shall also be forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council.
The Court of Auditors shall examine these
accounts in accordance with Article 287 of the Treaty. It shall publish a
report on the Agency’s activities every year.
4.           On receipt of the Court of
Auditors’ observations on the Agency’s provisional accounts, under Article 148 of
the general Financial Regulation, the Executive Director shall draw up the
Agency’s final accounts under his own responsibility and submit them to the Management
Board for an opinion.
5.           The Management Board
shall deliver an opinion on the Agency’s final accounts.
6.           The Executive Director
shall, by 1 July at the latest following each financial year, forward the
final accounts to the European Parliament, the Council, the Commission and the
Court of Auditors, together with the Management Board’s opinion.
7.           The final accounts shall
be published.
8.           The Executive Director
shall send the Court of Auditors a reply to its observations by
30 September at the latest following each financial year. He shall also
send this reply to the Management Board.
9.           The Executive Director
shall submit to the European Parliament, at the latter’s request, all
information necessary for the smooth application of the discharge procedure for
the financial year in question, in accordance with Article 165(3) of the
general Financial Regulation.
10.         The European Parliament, on
a recommendation from the Council acting by a qualified majority, shall, before
30 April of year N + 2 give a discharge to the Executive Director in
respect of the implementation of the budget for year N.
Article 60
Financial
Regulation
The financial rules applicable to the
Agency shall be adopted by the Management Board after the Commission has
been consulted. They may not depart from Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2343/2002[17]
unless such a departure is specifically required for the Agency’s operation and
the Commission has given its prior consent.
CHAPTER 11
STAFF
Article 61
General
Provisions
1.           The Staff Regulations of
the European Union and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the
European Union and the rules adopted by agreement between the institutions of
the European Union for giving effect to those Staff Regulations shall apply to
the staff of the Agency.
2.           In the interest of the
service, the Agency shall recruit:
(a)         
staff who are eligible for a contract of
indefinite duration, and
(b)         
staff who are not eligible for a contract of
indefinite duration.
Appropriate implementing rules to this
paragraph shall be adopted in accordance with the procedure provided for in
Article 110 of the Staff Regulations.
3.           The Agency shall take
appropriate administrative measures to organise its services in order to avoid
any conflict of interest.
Article 62
Executive
Director 
1.           The Executive Director shall
be engaged as a temporary agent of the agency under Article 2(a) of the
Conditions of Employment of Other servants.
2.           The Executive Director
shall be appointed by the Management Board, from a list of candidates proposed
by the Commission, following an open and transparent selection procedure. 
For the purpose of concluding the contract of
the Executive Director, the Agency shall be represented by the Chair of the
Management Board. 
Before appointment, the candidate selected by
the Management Board may be invited to make a statement before the competent
committee of the European Parliament and to answer questions by its members.
3.           The term of office of the
Executive Director shall be five years. By the end of this period, the
Commission shall undertake an assessment which takes into account the
evaluation of the performance of the Executive Director and the Agency's future
tasks and challenges.
4.           The Management Board,
acting on a proposal from the Commission which takes into account the
assessment referred to in paragraph 3, may extend the term of office of the
Executive Director once, for no more than five years. 
5.           The Management Board shall
inform the European Parliament about its intention to extend the Executive
Director's term of office. Within the month before any such extension, the Executive
Director may be invited to make a statement before the competent committee of
the Parliament and answer questions put by its members.
6.           An Executive Director
whose term of office has been extended may not participate in another selection
procedure for the same post at the end of the overall period.
7.           The Executive Director may
be removed from the office only upon a decision of the Management Board acting
on a proposal from the Commission.
Article 63
Seconded
national experts and other staff
The Agency may also make use of Seconded
National Experts or other staff not employed by the Agency under the Staff
Regulations and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants. 
The Management Board shall adopt a decision
laying down rules on the secondment to the Agency of national experts. 
CHAPTER 12
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 64
Privileges
and immunities
The Protocol on the Privileges and
Immunities of the European Union shall apply to the agency and its staff.
Article 65
Headquarters
agreement and operating conditions
1.           The necessary arrangements
concerning the accommodation to be provided for the Agency in the host Member
State and the facilities to be made available by that Member State together
with the specific rules applicable in the Agency’s host Member State to the
Executive Director, members of the Management Board, Agency staff and members
of their families shall be laid down in a headquarters agreement between the
Agency and the host Member State concluded once the Management Board’s approval
is obtained and no later than 2015.
2.           The host Member State
shall provide the best possible conditions to ensure the proper functioning of
the Agency, including multilingual, European-oriented schooling and appropriate
transport connections.
Article 66
Liability
1.           The contractual liability
of the Agency shall be governed by the law applicable to the contract in
question.
2.           The Court of Justice of
the European Union shall have jurisdiction to give judgment pursuant to any
arbitration clause contained in a contract concluded by the Agency.
3.           In the event of
non-contractual liability, the Agency shall, in accordance with the general
principles common to the laws of the Member States, make good any damage caused
by its departments or by its staff in the course of performance of their
duties.
4.           The Court of Justice of
the European Union shall have jurisdiction in disputes relating to compensation
for damage as referred to in paragraph 3.
Article 67
Language
arrangements
1.           The provisions laid down
in Regulation No 1 of 15 April 1958 determining the languages to be used in the
European Economic Community[18] shall apply to the
Agency.
2.           The translation services
required for the functioning of the Agency shall be provided by the Translation
Centre for the Bodies of the European Union.
Article 68
Participation
by third countries in the work of the Agency
1.           Without prejudice to
Article 40, the Agency shall be open to participation by third countries, in
particular by countries within the scope of the European Neighbourhood Policy,
the Enlargement policy countries and EFTA countries which have concluded
agreements with the Union under which the countries concerned have adopted and
are applying Union legislation, or its equivalent national measures, in the
field covered by this Regulation.
2.           In accordance with the
relevant provisions of the agreements referred to in paragraph 1, arrangements between
the Agency and the third countries shall be made to set out detailed rules for
participation by these countries in the work of the Agency, in particular the
nature and extent of such participation. These arrangements shall include
provisions on financial contributions and staff. They may provide for
representation, without the right to vote, on the Management Board.
The Agency shall sign the arrangements after
having received an agreement of the Commission and after consulting the
Management Board. 
Article 69
Cooperation
with national authorities and bodies
1.           The Agency may enter into
agreements with relevant national authorities, in particular the National
Safety Authorities, and other competent bodies, in relation to the implementation
of Articles 12, 16, 17 and 18. 
2.           The agreements may include
contracting of some of the tasks of the Agency to the national authorities, such
as checking and preparing files, verifying technical compatibility, performing visits
and drafting technical studies.
3.           The Agency shall ensure
that the agreements include at least specified description of tasks and conditions
for deliverables, the time-limits applying to their delivery and the level and
schedule of payments.
4.           The agreements described
in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 are without prejudice to the overall responsibility of
the Agency for performing its tasks as provided for in Articles 12, 16, 17 and 18.
Article 70
Transparency
Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the
European Parliament and of the Council[19] shall apply
to documents held by the Agency.
The Management Board shall adopt practical
measures for the implementation of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 by […].
Decisions taken by the Agency pursuant to
Article 8 of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 may form the subject of a
complaint to the Ombudsman or of an action before the Court of Justice of the
European Union, under Articles 228 and 263 of the Treaty respectively.
The processing of data of a personal nature
by Agency shall be subject to the Regulation (EC) No 45/2001.
Article 71
Security
rules for protecting classified information
The Agency shall apply the security
principles contained in the Commission’s security rules for protecting European
Union Classified Information (EUCI) and sensitive non-classified information,
as set out in the Annex to Commission Decision 2001/844/EC, ECSC, Euratom of 29
November 2001 amending its internal rules of procedure. This shall cover, inter
alia, provision for exchanging, processing and storing such information.
Article 72
Combating
fraud
1.           In order to facilitate
combating fraud, corruption and other unlawful activities under Regulation (EC)
No 1073/1999, within six months from the day of entry into force of this
Regulation, the Agency shall accede to the Inter-institutional Agreement of 25
May 1999 concerning internal investigations by the European Anti-fraud Office
(OLAF) and adopt the appropriate provisions applicable to all the employees of
the Agency using the template set out in the Annex to that Agreement.
2.           The European Court of
Auditors shall have the power of audit, on the basis of documents and on the
spot, over all grant beneficiaries, contractors and subcontractors who have
received Union funds from the Agency.
3.           OLAF may carry out
investigations, including on-the-spot checks and inspections, in accordance
with the provisions and procedures laid down in Regulation (EC) No 1073/1999 of
the European Parliament and of the Council [20]and Council
Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96[21] with a view to
establishing whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal
activity affecting the financial interests of the Union in connection with a
grant or a contract funded by the Agency.
4.           Without prejudice to
paragraphs 1, 2 and 3, cooperation agreements with third countries and
international organisations, contracts, grant agreements and grant decisions of
the Agency shall contain provisions expressly empowering the European Court of
Auditors and OLAF to conduct such audits and investigations, according to their
respective competences.
CHAPTER 13
FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 73
Delegated
acts relating to Articles 12, 16, 17 and 18
1.           The Commission shall be
empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 74 concerning fees
and charges in application of Articles 12, 16, 17 and 18. 
2.           The measures referred to
in paragraph 1 shall determine in particular the matters for which fees and
charges pursuant to Articles 12, 16, 17 and 18 are due, the amount of the fees
and charges and the way in which they are to be paid.
3.           Fees and charges shall be
levied for:
(a)         
 the issuing and renewal of authorisations for
placing in service of trackside control-command and signalling subsystems,
authorisations for placing on the market for vehicles and for types of vehicles,
including possible indication of compatibility with the networks or lines;
(b)         
the issuing and renewal of safety certificates; 
(c)         
the provision of services; they shall reflect
the actual cost of each individual provision;
(d)         
 the processing of appeals.
All fees and charges shall be expressed, and
payable, in euro.
4.           The amount of the fees and
charges shall be fixed at such a level as to ensure that the revenue in respect
thereof is sufficient to cover the full cost of the services delivered. All
expenditures of the Agency attributed to staff involved in activities referred
to in paragraph 3, including the employer's pro-rata contribution to the
pension scheme, shall be in particular reflected in this cost. Should a
significant imbalance resulting from the provision of the services covered by
fees and charges become recurrent, the revision of the level of the fees and
charges shall become mandatory. 
Article 74
Exercise of
the delegation
1.           The power to adopt
delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid
down in this Article. 
2.           The delegation of power
referred to in Article 73 shall be conferred on the Commission for an
indeterminate period of time from the date of entry into force of this
Regulation.
3.           The delegation of power
referred to in Article 73 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament
or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation of
the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following
the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the
European Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect
the validity of any delegated acts already in force. 
4.           As soon as it adopts a
delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European
Parliament and to the Council. 
5.           A delegated act adopted
pursuant to Article 73 shall enter into force only if no objection has been
expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of
[2 months] of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the
Council or if, before the
expiry of that period, the European
Parliament and the Council have both informed the Commission that they will not
object. That period shall be extended by [2
months] at the initiative of the European Parliament or the Council.
Article 75
Committee
procedure
The Commission shall be assisted by the
committee established by Article 21 of Directive 96/48/EC. That committee shall
be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. 
Where reference is made to this Article,
Article 4 of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 shall apply.
Article 76
Evaluation and review 
1.           No later than five years
after the entry into force of this Regulation and every five years thereafter, the
Commission shall commission an evaluation to assess, in particular, the impact,
effectiveness and efficiency of the Agency and its working practices. The
evaluation shall address, in particular, any need to amend the mandate of the
Agency, and the financial implications of any such amendment.
2.           The Commission shall
forward the evaluation report together with its conclusions on the report to
the European Parliament, the Council and the Management Board. The findings of
the evaluation shall be made public.
3.           On the occasion of every
second evaluation, there shall also be an assessment of the results achieved by
the Agency having regard to its objectives, mandate and tasks.
Article 77
Transitional provisions
1.           The Agency replaces and
succeeds the European Railway Agency established by Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 as regards all ownership, agreements,
legal obligations, employments contracts, financial commitments and liabilities.
2.           By way of derogation from
Article 43, the Members of the Administrative Board appointed under Regulation (EC) No 881/2004 before the
date of entry into force of this Regulation, shall remain in office until the
expiry date of their term as Members of the Management Board. 
By way of derogation from Article 49, the
Executive Director which has been appointed in accordance with Regulation (EC)
No 881/2004 shall remain in office until the expiry date of his term.
3.           By way of derogation from
Article 61, all employment contracts in force on the date of entry into force
of this Regulation, shall be honoured until their expiry date.
Article 78
Repeal
Regulation
(EC) No 881/2004 is repealed.
Article 79
Entry
into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on
the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal
of the European Union. 
This Regulation shall be binding in its
entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 
For the European Parliament                       For
the Council
The President                                                 The
President
ANNEX
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL
STATEMENT
1.           FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
1.1.        Title of the
proposal/initiative
Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the
Council on the European Union Agency for Railways and repealing Regulation (EC)
No 881/2004 
1.2.        Policy area(s) concerned
in the ABM/ABB structure[22]
06: Mobility and Transport
0602: Inland, air and maritime transport policy
060208: European Railway Agency
06020801: European Railway Agency — Contribution to Titles 1 and 2
06020802: European Railway Agency — Contribution to Title 3
1.3.        Nature of the
proposal/initiative
¨ The
proposal/initiative relates to a new action
¨ The
proposal/initiative relates to a new action following a pilot project/preparatory
action[23]
ý The proposal/initiative relates to the
extension of an existing action
¨ The
proposal/initiative relates to an action redirected towards a new action
1.4.        Objectives
1.4.1.     The Commission’s
multiannual strategic objective(s) targeted by the proposal/initiative
Objectives/EU added value in line with Europe 2020:
The Agency contributes to interoperable, safe and sustainable
railway transport for the EU economy and for the EU citizens. This is fully in
line with the three priorities of Europe 2020:
– Smart growth: developing an economy based on knowledge and
innovation. The Agency contributes to the development of the highest possible
technical standards for railway vehicles and infrastructure, thus promoting
knowledge and innovation.
– Sustainable growth: promoting a more resource efficient, greener
and more competitive economy. The Agency contributes to making the EU transport
sector more sustainable and environmentally-friendly, limiting the overall
level of emissions and energy consumption. Rail transport will contribute to
the ‘20/20/20’ climate/energy targets and the flagship initiative ‘Resource
efficient Europe’. The Agency will play its role in the sector implementation.
– Inclusive growth: fostering a high-employment economy delivering
social and territorial cohesion. With regard to peripheral regions and their
connection with the core, railway transport is an essential element for
ensuring territorial cohesion. It provides affordable and sustainable means of
transportation for large parts of population, thus contributing to increased
social mobility and increased employment opportunities, and helps to close the
gap between poorer and richer regions and countries in the EU.
1.4.2.     Specific objective(s) and
ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned
Budget area: 06 02
ABM/ABB activity concerned: 060208
European Railway Agency:
- Budget heading 06 02 08 01 — European Railway Agency — Subsidy
under Titles I and II (administrative expenditure)
- Budget heading 06 02 08 02 — European Railway Agency — Subsidy
under Title III (operational expenditure)
Specific objectives:
Specific objective 1: Increase the
efficiency of railway safety certification and authorisation procedures by
issuing single safety certificates, vehicle authorisations for placing on the
market and authorisations for placing in service of trackside control-command
and signalling subsystems valid throughout the EU, and ensure
non-discrimination.
Specific objective 2: Increase the
coherence of the EU railway framework by monitoring national railway
authorities and reducing the number of national railway rules.
Specific objective 3: Improve
implementation and application of EU railway legislation through increased
assistance to the Commission, Member States and stakeholders.
Specific objective 4: Assist the
Commission with creating and updating secondary railway interoperability and
safety legislation, including developing a common approach to safety.
Specific objective 5: Ensure coherent
development of the ERTMS in the EU and promote the ERTMS outside the EU.
Specific objective 6: Ensure proper
certification of train drivers and other related tasks, in accordance with
Directive 2007/59/EC.
Specific objective 7: Maintain and
update public registers and databases relating to railway safety and
interoperability.
1.4.3.     Expected result(s) and
impact
Specify the effects
which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups targeted.
Results linked with the specific objectives:
Result of specific objective 1: reduced
costs for applicants and shorter duration of issuing of safety certificates,
vehicle authorisations for placing on the market and authorisations for placing
in service of trackside control-command and signalling subsystems; identical
conditions for all applicants in the EU; ensured non-discrimination for
operators.
Result of specific objective 2:
harmonisation of the application of EU railway legislation and practices of
national authorities; increased clarity and transparency of legal requirements
and operating conditions in the EU by reducing unnecessary rules, both limiting
possibilities for discriminatory practices against operators.
Result of specific objective 3:
increased understanding of railway legislation by stakeholders and Member
States leading to smoother operation of the Single European Railway Area;
making the work of different Commission services more effective and efficient.
Result of specific objective 4: Single
European Railway Area made more interoperable with a high level of safety, with
benefits for railway undertakings, customers and passengers.
Result of specific objective 5: the ERTMS
is implemented consistently in the EU with its equipment compliant with
specifications in force; ERTMS standards promoted outside the EU.
Result of specific objective 6: train
drivers are treated in a consistent manner in the EU.
Result of specific objective 7:
transparency for railway stakeholders, Member States and general public in
relation to important railway interoperability and safety data.
1.4.4.     Indicators of results and
impact
Specify the
indicators for monitoring implementation of the proposal/initiative.
Indicators of specific objective 1:
- number of safety certificates issued;
- number of vehicle authorisations for placing on the market issued;
- number of authorisations for placing in service of trackside
control-command and signalling subsystems issued.
Indicators of specific objective 2:
- number of audit reports of national authorities issued;
- number of national rules withdrawn;
- number of national rules declared cross-accepted;
- other outcomes relating to control and monitoring.
Indicators of specific objective 3:
- number of reports evaluating implementation of railway
legislation;
- number of railway projects evaluated;
- number of information and training events (workshops, conferences)
organised;
- number of interpretative documents issued;
- number of assistance visits performed
- other outcomes relating to increased assistance.
Indicators of specific objective 4:
- number of recommendations for new Technical Specifications of
Interoperability (TSIs) sent to the Commission;
- number of recommendations for revision of Technical Specifications
of Interoperability (TSIs) sent to the Commission;
- number of recommendations for new Common Safety Methods (CSMs)
sent to the Commission;
- number of recommendations for revision of Common Safety Methods
(CSMs) sent to the Commission;
- number of opinions provided to the Commission, Member States and
other stakeholders;
- number of impact assessments and cost-benefit analyses issued;
- other outcomes relating to increasing interoperability and safety.
Indicators of specific objective 5:
- number of recommendations relating to changes and new versions of the
ERTMS issued;
- number of reports provided to the Commission evaluating the
implementation of the conformity assessment and the EC verification procedure
of ERTMS equipment;
- number of recommendations relating to technical incompatibilities
of ERTMS projects sent to the Commission
- other outcomes relating to ensuring coherent development and
deployment of the ERTMS.
Indicators of specific objective 6:
- number of train drivers certified in
accordance with the Directive on train drivers;
- other outcomes relating to harmonisation of train drivers conditions.
Indicators of specific objective 7:
- number of public databases and registers
established and managed;
- other outcomes relating to transparency of railway-related data.
1.5.        Grounds for the
proposal/initiative
1.5.1.     Requirement(s) to be met in
the short or long term
Allow ERA to engage in new activities and continue to sufficiently
cover existing tasks which are necessary to achieve fully interoperable and
safe internal railway market (Single European Railway Area).
1.5.2.     Added value of EU involvement
Current EU involvement (tasks of the European Railway Agency) is
laid down in ERA Founding Regulation 881/2004. Moreover, Directive 2004/49/EC,
Directive 2008/57/EC and Directive 2007/59/EC have directly and indirectly
given other tasks to the Agency. In a similar manner, numerous secondary
legislation adopted by the Commission under the above-mentioned directives, in
particular the TSIs, CSMs and CSTs, have had an impact of the activities and
work of ERA. The current Regulation aims to combine all existing tasks of the
Agency in one legal act, and extend the role of ERA to areas where is it
justified.
In line with the Transport White Paper of 2011 (Roadmap to a Single
European Transport Area — Towards a competitive and resource efficient
transport system) and the results of the impact assessment accompanying current
initiative, this proposal will provide further EU added value by eliminating
existing technical and administrative barriers in the railway sector, notably
by:
- making railway vehicle authorisation and safety certification of
railway undertakings more efficient (cheaper and faster) and impartial, by
moving them to the EU level;
- increasing the coherence and application of EU railway acquis
by allowing the Agency to monitor the functioning of national authorities
active in railway interoperability and safety fields;
- facilitating faster progress towards truly common EU railway
standards by increasing ERA’s action in reducing national railway rules;
- improving spending of EU funds for the railways (TEN, Cohesion
Fund, Structural Funds, research programmes, etc.).
EU involvement through ERA allows for high added value thanks to:
- the use of a dedicated structure and qualified staff, some of whom
are already available;
- positive experience with tried and tested methods (for example,
using the established and operational network of national safety authorities);
- its objectivity and impartiality, highly appreciated by
stakeholders.
1.5.3.     Lessons learned from
similar experiences in the past
Evaluation of the ERA Regulation and functioning of the Agency
(2009-2010) and the general evaluation of the EU Agencies in 2009 both showed
the added value provided by the Agency.
This initiative seeks to apply (by revising the ERA Regulation) the
recommendations from the ERA evaluation exercise, of the Court of Auditors,
Internal Audit Service and the Joint Statement of the Commission, the European
Parliament and the Council on decentralised agencies, particularly with regard
to internal structure, governance and functioning.
1.5.4.     Coherence and possible
synergy with other relevant instruments
The proposal is in line with the Transport White
Paper of 2011, in particular with its initiatives 1 and 19:
- "Achieve a single vehicle type
authorisation and a single railway undertaking safety certification by
reinforcing the role of the European Railway Agency (ERA)";
- "Enhance the role of ERA in the field of
rail safety, in particular its supervision on national safety measures taken by
National Safety Authorities and their progressive harmonisation".
The proposal is consistent with the EU railway
interoperability and safety policy and legislation, in particular Directives
2004/49 (Railway Safety Directive) and 2008/57 (Railway Interoperability
Directive) which will also be amended as part of this initiative. All three
revised acts are interlinked and aim at removing remaining administrative and
technical barriers, in particular by establishing a common approach to safety
and interoperability rules to increase economies of scale for railway
undertakings active across the EU, decreasing administrative costs and
accelerating administrative procedures, as well as to avoiding disguised
discrimination.
Moreover, this initiative is a part of a broader Fourth Railway
Package which will aim — besides the objective described above — to open up the
domestic rail passenger market and optimise the governance of infrastructure
management; synergies are expected especially with regard to reducing
discrimination in relation to access to infrastructure, thus lowering the
access barriers for new entrants.
There is also an important synergy between the revised tasks of ERA
and the TEN-T Executive Agency in relation to the evaluation of railway
projects, in relation to increased value for money and efficiency of projects
funded from the EU funds.
Besides, this initiative is consistent with and implements
recommendations of the Court of Auditors, Internal Audit Service and the Joint
Statement of the Commission, the European Parliament and the Council on
decentralised agencies, as well as with the evaluation of ERA.
Finally, this initiative seeks to include in the ERA Regulation a
number of tasks and activities that were assigned to the Agency by other acts,
particularly Directive 2007/59/EC, Commission Decisions on Technical
Specifications on Interoperability (TSIs) and Common Safety Methods (CSMs).
1.6.        Duration and financial
impact
x Proposal/initiative of unlimited
duration
–     
Implementation with a start-up period from 2015
to 2020,
–     
followed by full-scale operation.
1.7.        Management mode(s)
envisaged[24]
¨ Centralised direct management by the Commission
x Centralised indirect management with the delegation of implementation tasks to:
–     
¨  executive agencies
–     
x bodies set up by the Communities[25]
–     
¨  national public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service mission
–     
¨  persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions
pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union and identified in the
relevant basic act within the meaning of Article 49 of the Financial Regulation
¨ Shared management with the Member States
¨ Decentralised management with third countries
¨ Joint management with international organisations (to be specified)
2.           MANAGEMENT MEASURES
2.1.        Monitoring and reporting
rules
Specify frequency
and conditions.
All EU agencies work under a strict monitoring system involving
internal audit capability, the Internal Audit Service of the Commission, the
Administrative Board, the Commission, the Court of Auditors and the Budgetary
Authority. This system as laid down in the ERA founding Regulation will
continue to apply.
2.2.        Management and control
system
2.2.1.     Risk(s) identified
None
2.2.2.     Control method(s) envisaged
Not applicable
2.3.        Measures to prevent fraud
and irregularities
Specify existing or
envisaged prevention and protection measures.
Anti-fraud measures are included in the ERA founding Regulation
under Article 41 and will continue to apply.
3.           ESTIMATED FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE
PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE
3.1.        Heading(s) of the
multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected
·      Existing expenditure budget lines
In order of
multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
 Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution 
 Number [Description] || Diff./non-diff. ([26]) || from EFTA[27] countries || from candidate countries[28] || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 18(1)(aa) of the Financial Regulation 
 1.1 || 06.02.08 [ERA budget line] || Non-diff. || YES || NO || NO || NO 
3.2.        Estimated impact on
expenditure
Before going into the details of the estimated
impact of the present proposal, it is important to highlight that this
estimated impact is provisional at this stage as it is subject to the adoption
of the new Multiannual Financial Framework 2014-2020 by the Budgetary
Authority.
3.2.1.     Summary of estimated impact
on expenditure
EUR million (current prices, to 3 decimal places)
 Heading of multiannual financial framework: || 1 || Smart and Inclusive Growth 
 DG: MOVE ||   ||   || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL 2015-2020 
  Administrative appropriations ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Number of budget line 06.02.08 [ERA budget line] Basis: - Starting point - DB 2013 at € 25M, - 2% taxation applied to staff in 2014-2017, - 1% increase of yearly budget due to annual adjustment. From 2017 onwards external revenues from fees and charges kick in so no call on the EU budget in relation to new staff. || Commitments || (1) || 25.613 (including 0.113 for new tasks) || 26  (incl. 0.3 for new tasks) || 26   (0 for new tasks) || 26.25   (0 for new tasks) || 26.5   (0 for new tasks) || 26.75   (0 for new tasks) || 157.113   (out of which 0.413 to cover new tasks in 2015-2016) 
 Payments || (2) || 25.613 || 26 || 26 || 26.25 || 26.5 || 26.75 || 157.113 
 TOTAL appropriations for DG MOVE || Commitments || (5)=1+3 || 25.613 || 26 || 26 || 26.25 || 26.5 || 26.75 || 157.113   (out of which 0.413 to cover new tasks in 2015-2016) 
 Payments || (6)=2+4 || 25.613 || 26 || 26 || 26.25 || 26.5 || 26.75 || 157.113 
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 1 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || =5 || 25.613 || 26 || 26 || 26.25 || 26.5 || 26.75 || 157.113   (out of which 0.413 to cover new tasks in 2015-2016) 
 Payments || =6 || 25.613 || 26 || 26 || 26.25 || 26.5 || 26.75 || 157.113 
 Heading of multiannual financial framework: || 5 || ’ Administrative expenditure ‘ 
EUR million (current prices, to 3 decimal places)
   ||   ||   || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL 2015-2020 
 DG: MOVE || 
  Human resources Basis: current level of budget for staff at DG MOVE dealing with ERA-related issues (0.655 €M – 5 staff) applied each year + 1% annual adjustment || 0.655 || 0.66 || 0.665 || 0.67 || 0.675 || 0.68 || 4.005 
  Other administrative expenditure || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 TOTAL DG MOVE || Appropriations || 0.655 || 0.66 || 0.665 || 0.67 || 0.675 || 0.68 || 4.005 
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || (Total commitments = Total payments) || 0.655 || 0.66 || 0.665 || 0.67 || 0.675 || 0.68 || 4.005 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
   ||   ||   || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL 
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 5 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || 26.268 || 26.66 || 26.665 || 26.92 || 27.175 || 27.43 || 161.118 
 Payments || 26.268 || 26.66 || 26.665 || 26.92 || 27.175 || 27.43 || 161.118 
3.2.2.     Proposed draft
establishment plan for ERA 2015-2020
ALL NEW STAFF IS FINANCED WITH EXTERNAL
FEES AND CHARGES FROM 2017:
  Proposed staffing for ERA 2015-2020 [Basis: 143 establishment plan staff in 2013 and 2 % taxation by 2017 (-2-3 person per year)] ||   || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 
 AD Grades ||   || 101 || 100 || 99 || 99 || 99 || 99 
 New AD Grades ||   || 0 || 0 || 12 || 14 || 14 || 14 
 Total AD ||   || 101 || 100 || 111 || 113 || 113 || 113 
 AST Grades ||   || 37 || 36 || 34 || 34 || 34 || 34 
 New AST Grades ||   || 0 || 0 || 4 || 4 || 4 || 4 
 Total AST ||   || 37 || 36 || 38 || 38 || 38 || 38 
 Subtotal Establishment Plan Posts ||   || 138 || 136 || 149 || 151 || 151 || 151 
 SNEs ||   || 6 || 6 || 6 || 6 || 6 || 6 
 New SNEs ||   || 2 || 5 || 12 || 13 || 13 || 13 
 Total SNEs ||   || 8 || 11 || 18 || 19 || 19 || 19 
 Contract Agents ||   || 15 || 15 || 15 || 15 || 15 || 15 
 New Contract agents ||   || 1 || 3 || 7 || 9 || 10 || 12 
 Total Contract agents ||   || 16 || 18 || 22 || 24 || 25 || 27 
 Cumulative new posts ||   || 5 || 10 || 35 || 40 || 41 || 43 
 Impact on EPP ||   || 0 || 0 || 16 || 18 || 18 || 18 
 GENERAL TOTAL ||   || 162 || 165 || 189 || 194 || 195 || 197 
   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
3.2.3.     Estimated impact on
administrative and operational appropriations
–     
¨  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational
appropriations
–     
x The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational and
administrative appropriations, as explained below:
–     
Please note that the outputs given below relate
to the total budget of ERA (Titles 1+2+3).
–     
Please note that the cost of the outputs in
Specific Objective no 1 will constitute an income for ERA: the Agency will
charge external applicants for issuing these documents. Therefore, they are
marked in brackets and are not added to the total sum of costs of all the
outputs.
Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal
places)
 Indicate objectives and outputs   ò ||   ||   || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL || 
 ||
 Type of output[29] || Average cost of the output || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Total number of outputs || Total cost ||
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 1[30]: Increase the efficiency of railway safety certification and authorisation procedures by issuing single safety certificates, vehicle authorisations for placing on the market and authorisations for placing in service of trackside control-command and signalling subsystems valid throughout the EU, and ensure non-discrimination. ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Single Safety Certificates || Number of safety certificates issued || (0.01) - will be covered by fees and charges || 0 ||   || 0 ||   || 110 || (1.1) || 110 || (1.1) || 110 || (1.1) || 110 || (1.1) || 440 || (4.4) will be covered by fees and charges 
 Vehicle authorisations for placing on the market || Number of vehicle authorisations for placing on the market issued || (0.017) - will be covered by fees and charges || 0 ||   || 0 ||   || 456 || (7.752) || 452 || (7.684) || 449 || (7.632) || 447 || (7.598) || 1804 || (30.67) will be covered by fees and charges 
 System Authority for the ERTMS || Number of authorisations for placing in service of trackside control-command and signalling sub-systems issued || (0.05) will be covered by fees and charges || 0 ||   || 0 ||   || 30 || (1.5) || 32 || (1.6) || 35 || (1.75) || 40 || (2) || 137 || (6.85) will be covered by fees and charges 
 Sub-total for specific objective No 1 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || (10.352) ||   || (10.384) ||   || (10.482) ||   || (10.698) ||   || (41.92) 
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 2: Increase the coherence of the EU railway framework by monitoring national railway authorities and reducing the number of national railway rules || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Total number of outputs || Total cost 
 Monitoring national authorities || Number of audit reports issued || 0.2 || 2 || 0.4 || 3 || 0.6 || 5 || 1 || 5 || 1 || 5 || 1 || 5 || 1 || 25 || 5 
 Reduction of diverging national rules and increasing cross-acceptance || Number of national rules withdrawn || 0.0015 || 1000 || 1.5 || 1500 || 2.25 || 1500 || 2.25 || 2000 || 3 || 1500 || 2.25 || 1500 || 2.25 || 9000 || 13.5 
 Number of national rules declared cross-accepted   || 0.001 || 1000 || 1.0 || 1000 || 1.0 || 1000 || 1.0 || 1000 || 1.0 || 1000 || 1.0 || 1000 || 1.0 || 8000 || 6.0 
 Other || Other outcomes relating to control and monitoring || 0.001 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 125 || 0.125 || 125 || 0.125 || 150 || 0.15 || 150 || 0.15 || 750 || 0.75 
 Sub-total for specific objective No 2 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 25.25 
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 3: Improve implementation and application of EU railway legislation by increased assistance to the Commission, Member States and stakeholders, and other tasks ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Assistance to the Commission || Number of reports evaluating implementation of railway legislation || 0.1 || 3 || 0.3 || 5 || 0.5 || 7 || 0.7 || 10 || 1 || 14 || 1 || 18 || 1 || 57 || 5.7 
 Number of railway projects evaluated || 0.05 || 5 || 0.25 || 7 || 0.35 || 10 || 0.5 || 15 || 0.75 || 20 || 1 || 25 || 1.25 || 82 || 4.1 
 Assistance to Member States and other stakeholders || Number of information and training events (workshops, conferences) organised || 0.1 || 5 || 0.5 || 7 || 0.7 || 10 || 1 || 12 || 1.2 || 14 || 1.4 || 16 || 1.6 || 64 || 6.4 
 Number of interpretative documents issued || 0.1 || 2 || 0.2 || 2 || 0.2 || 4 || 0.4 || 8 || 0.8 || 10 || 1 || 10 || 1 || 36 || 3.6 
 Number of assistance visits performed || 0.1 || 2 || 0.2 || 4 || 0.4 || 8 || 0.8 || 10 || 1 || 10 || 1 || 12 || 1.2 || 46 || 4.6 
 Other tasks || Other outcomes relating to increased assistance || 0.001 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 600 || 0.6 
 Sub-total for specific objective No 3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 25 
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 4: Assist the Commission in creating and updating secondary railway interoperability and safety legislation, including developing a common approach to safety || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Total number of outputs || Total cost 
   Increasing interoperability || Number of new TSIs sent to the Commission || 1 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 
 Number of revised TSIs sent to the Commission || 0.6 || 4 || 2.4 || 4 || 2.4 || 4 || 2.4 || 4 || 2.4 || 4 || 2.4 || 4 || 2.4 || 24 || 14.4 
   Increasing level of safety || Number of new CSMs sent to the Commission || 1 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 1 || 4 || 4 
 Number of revised CSMs sent to the Commission || 0.6 || 4 || 2.4 || 4 || 2.4 || 4 || 2.4 || 4 || 2.4 || 4 || 2.4 || 4 || 2.4 || 24 || 14.4 
   Facilitating operation of Single European Railway Area || Number of opinions provided to the Commission, MS and stakeholders || 0.2 || 6 || 1.2 || 6 || 1.2 || 8 || 1.6 || 8 || 1.6 || 8 || 1.6 || 8 || 1.6 || 44 || 8.8 
 Number of impact assessments and cost-benefit analyses issued || 0.06 || 20 || 1.2 || 20 || 12 || 25 || 1.5 || 27 || 1.62 || 29 || 1.74 || 30 || 1.8 || 151 || 9.06 
 Other || Other outcomes relating to increasing interoperability and safety || 0.006 || 50 || 0.3 || 80 || 0.48 || 80 || 0.48 || 80 || 0.48 || 80 || 0.48 || 80 || 0.48 || 450 || 2.7 
 Sub-total for specific objective No 4 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 57.36 
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 5: Ensure a coherent development of the ERTMS in the EU and promote the ERTMS outside the EU ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
   System Authority for the ERTMS || Number of recommendations for changes and new versions of the ERTMS issued || 0.7 || 2 || 1.4 || 2 || 1.4 || 4 || 2.8 || 5 || 3.5 || 6 || 4.2 || 8 || 5.6 || 27 || 18.9 
     Verification of implementation of the ERTMS || Number of reports evaluating the implementation of the conformity assessment and the EC verification procedure of ERTMS equipment issued || 0.04 || 8 || 0.32 || 12 || 0.48 || 20 || 0.8           || 25 || 1 || 30 || 1.2 || 30 || 1.2 || 125 || 5 
 Number of recommendations relating to technical incompatibilities of ERTMS projects issued || 0.1 || 3 || 0.3 || 3 || 0.3 || 5 || 0.5 || 8 || 0.8 || 10 || 1 || 12 || 1.2 || 41 || 4.1 
 Other tasks || Other outcomes relating to ensuring coherent development and deployment of the ERTMS || 0.001 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 100 || 0.1 || 600 || 0.6 
 Sub-total for specific objective No 5 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 28.6 
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 6: Ensure proper certification of train drivers and other related tasks, in accordance with Directive 2007/59/EC || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Total number of outputs || Total cost 
     Harmonisation of criteria for train drivers || Number of measures harmonising the train drivers conditions issued in accordance with the Directive on train drivers || 0.6 || 2 || 1.2 || 2 || 1.2 || 2 || 1.2 || 2 || 1.2 || 2 || 1.2 || 2 || 1.2 || 12 || 7.2 
 Other outcomes || 0.001 || 10 || 0.01 || 10 || 0.01 || 10 || 0.01 || 10 || 0.01 || 10 || 0.01 || 10 || 0.01 || 60 || 0.6 
 Sub-total for specific objective No 6 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 7.8 
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 7: Maintain and update public registers and databases relating to railway safety and interoperability ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
   Transparency for stakeholders and the public regarding railway interoperability and safety data || Number of public databases and registers established and managed || 0.1 || 15 || 1.5 || 17 || 1.7 || 20 || 2 || 20 || 2 || 25 || 2.5 || 25 || 2.5 || 122 || 12.2 
 Other outcomes || 0.001 || 10 || 0.01 || 10 || 0.01 || 15 || 0.015 || 15 || 0.015 || 15 || 0.015 || 15 || 0.015 || 80 || 0.8 
 Sub-total for specific objective No 7 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 13 
 TOTAL COST ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   || 157.01 
3.2.4.     Estimated impact on
appropriations of an administrative nature
3.2.4.1.  Summary
–     
¨  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative
appropriations
–     
x The proposal/initiative requires the use of administrative
appropriations, as explained below:
Basis for calculations: current staff at DG
MOVE dealing with ERA-related issues (5 persons, 0.131€ M per person/year
and 1% annual adjustment) applied to each year; no increase due to enhanced
powers of ERA
EUR million (to 3
decimal places)
   || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL 2015-2020 
 Officials (AD Grades) || 0.655 || 0.66 || 0.665 || 0.67 || 0.675 || 0.68 || 4.005 
 Officials (AST grades) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 Contractual agent ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Temporary agents || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 Seconded National Experts || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 TOTAL || 0.655 || 0.66 || 0.665 || 0.67 || 0.675 || 0.68 || 4.005 
3.2.4.2.   Estimated requirements of
human resources
–     
¨  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human
resources
–     
x The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources, as
explained below:
Basis for calculations: current staff at DG
MOVE dealing with ERA-related issues (5 persons, 0.131€ M per person/year)
applied to each year; no increase due to enhanced powers of ERA
Estimate to be expressed in full amounts
(or at most to one decimal place)
   || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 
  Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary agents) 
 XX 01 01 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) || 5 || 5 || 5 || 5 || 5 || 5 
 XX 01 01 02 (Delegations) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 XX 01 05 01 (Indirect research) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 10 01 05 01 (Direct research) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
  External personnel (in Full Time Equivalent unit: FTE)[31] 
 XX 01 02 01 (CA, INT, SNE from the ‘global envelope’) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 XX 01 02 02 (CA, INT, JED, LA and SNE in the delegations) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 XX 01 04 yy [32] || - at Headquarters[33] || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 - in delegations || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 XX 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE — Indirect research) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 10 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE — Direct research) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 Other budget lines (specify) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 
 TOTAL || 5 || 5 || 5 || 5 || 5 || 5 
XX is the
policy area or budget title concerned.
The human resources required
will be met by staff from the DG who are already assigned to management of the action
and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if necessary with any
additional allocation which may be granted to the managing DG under the annual
allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary constraints.
Description of tasks to be carried out:
 Officials and temporary agents || Existing staff of DG MOVE deals with ERA-related issues, including: - managing implementing measures adopted in result of Agency's recommendations (Commission Decisions and Regulations) in the field of railway safety and interoperability; - administrative coordination and control over ERA: work programmes, multi-annual staff policy plans, meetings of Management Board and its sub-committee; - policy coordination: participation in working parties of ERA, content of work programme, mandates from Commission to ERA, working-level meetings; - managing ERA's opinions; - financial and accounting responsibilities regarding ERA at the side of the Commission (budget, discharge etc.). 
 External personnel ||   
3.2.5.     Compatibility with the
current multiannual financial framework
–     
¨  Proposal/initiative is compatible the current multiannual
financial framework.
–     
x Proposal/initiative will entail reprogramming of the relevant
heading in the multiannual financial framework.
Explain what reprogramming is required,
specifying the budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
The ERA budget line (06.02.08) will have to be adjusted to the
amount specified in this financial statement (total of € 157.113 M for the
period 2015-2020).
For the time being, only indicative amounts for the agencies are
included in the financial framework. The indicative amount for ERA was
estimated before the results of the impact assessment and other calculations linked
with this initiative were known.
For the period 2015-2020 the status of ERA will change from ‘cruising
speed agency’ to ‘new tasks agency’.
–     
¨  Proposal/initiative requires application of the flexibility
instrument or revision of the multiannual financial framework[34].
Explain what is required, specifying the
headings and budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
3.2.6.     Third-party contributions
–     
The proposal/initiative provides for the
co-financing estimated below:
Appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
   || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || Total 
 EFTA Contribution from Norway and Iceland calculated at 2 % of the budget || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 3 
 TOTAL appropriations co-financed || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 0.5 || 3 
3.3.        Estimated impact on
revenue
–              
¨ Proposal/initiative has no financial impact on revenue.
–              
x Proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:
–              
x on own resources
–              
¨ on miscellaneous revenue
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Budget revenue line: || Appropriations available for the ongoing budget year || Impact of the proposal/initiative[35] 
 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 
 ERA budget line 06.02.08 ||   ||   ||   || 10.352 || 10.384 || 10.482 || 10.698 
Specify the method for
calculating the impact on revenue.
Some of the new tasks envisaged for ERA (safety certificates,
vehicle authorisations for placing on the market and authorisations for placing
in service of trackside control-command and signalling sub-systems) will allow
for charging the external applicants for issuing them.
According to the impact assessment, these new tasks will start in
2017 and the revenue for ERA was calculated in the following way:
          - cost of issuing a safety certificate: €0.01m
          - cost of issuing a vehicle authorisation: €0.017m
          - cost of issuing an authorisations for placing in service
of trackside control-command and signalling sub-system: €0.05m 
          - respective numbers of all types of decisions issued each
year are provided in table 3.2.3.
Summary of method of calculation:
The fees set out in the impact assessment report have been calculated
by taking the average of the current fees paid by operators wishing to obtain a
safety certificate or gain vehicle authorisation in the EU; a similar approach
was used in case of authorisations for placing in service of trackside
control-command and signalling sub-system. There was a large variation in the
fees paid, and also a substantial difference between the fees paid in EU15
Member States (about €20,000 for safety certificates and €28,000 for
authorisations) and the fees paid in EU12 Member States (about €3,000 for
safety certificates and €17,000 for authorisations). In determining the future
value of these fees it was assumed that, given: the cost of staff in the
Agency, the more streamlined processes of dealing with the applications, a
value close to the mid-point of the low average and the high average would be
the most appropriate going forward. 
It is important to note that the calculations set out for the fees
are average across all types of safety certificates and vehicle authorisations;
4 types of safety certificates and 20 types of vehicle authorisations were
identified in the IA support study. Although the “centralisation” process with
ERA will lead to the number of types of certificates and authorisations
falling, there will still be multiple categories. For example, there will still
be a different process for the authorisation of a locomotive and a wagon. As
such the fees will need to be differentiated for these two categories. In
particular, the fees for wagon authorisation will be lower than the average and
the fees for locomotives and multiple units will be higher.
The number (price per authorisation/certificate) that was calculated
in the impact assessment report is meant to be an average, it would be up to
the Agency to define the exact fees for the different categories with the aim
of ensuring that the average of the fees collected was equal, or greater than
this average. However, the aim of the calculation is to provide a realistic but
conservative estimation of revenues for the Agency, and it is not excluded that
the fees to be charged can actually lead to a higher average value, if
necessary and justified.
In terms of the number of authorisations and certificates, these
were calculated starting from the current level of authorisations and
certifications. For future years, in relation to safety certificates, it was
assumed that the number of new entrants into the market would lead to an
increase in the number of safety certificates issued over time while the fact
that there may be a change in the types of safety certificates could decrease
that number. Therefore, as a conservative estimate it was assumed that there is
no change in the total annual number of safety certificates. 
For vehicle authorisations the approach was slightly different: the
model starts from existing authorisation levels as provided by stakeholders and
various studies. However, while there are likely to be more new entrants and
therefore in absolute terms more vehicles to authorise, new entrants are more
likely to stick with proven technology and as such with the rolling stock that
has already been certified. Furthermore, as the industry standardises, in
future there are likely to be fewer types of vehicles to authorise, leading to
a slight fall in the number of authorisations. Once again, the model divided
the assessment into EU15 and EU12 Member States. 
DG MOVE considers that the calculations are robust and properly based
on existing and verifiable data obtained from stakeholders and the European
Railway Agency. More information on methodology is provided in the impact
assessment report accompanying this proposal, in particular its Annex VII.      
[1]               http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/127599.pdf.
[2]               COM(2012) 299 final.
[3]               COM(2012) 259 final.
[4]               http://ec.europa.eu/transport/evaluations/doc/2011_era-evaluation-881-2004.pdf.
[5]               OJ C … p ….
[6]               OJ C … p ….
[7]               OJ L 164, 30.4.2004, p. 1.
[8]               OJ L 228, 9.9.1996,
p. 1. 
[9]               OJ L 136, 31.5.1999,
p. 1.
[10]               OJ L 136, 31.5.1999,
p. 15.
[11]               Commission Decision 98/500/EC
of 20 May 1998 on the establishment of Sectoral Dialogue Committees
promoting the dialogue between the social partners at European level (OJ
L 225, 12.8.1998, p. 27).
[12]               OJ L 260, 30.9.2008, p. 13
[13]               OJ L 51, 23.2.2012, p. 1
[14]             OJ L 276, 20.10.2010, p. 22
[15]             OJ L 218, 13.8.2008, p. 30.
[16]             OJ L 315, 3.12.2007, p. 51.
[17]             Commission Regulation (EC, Euratom)
No 2343/2002 of 23 December 2002 on the framework Financial Regulation for
the bodies referred to in Article 185 of Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No
1605/2002 on the Financial Regulation applicable to the general budget of the
European Communities (OJ L 357, 31.12.2002, p. 72).
[18]             OJ 17, 6.10.1958, p. 385
[19]             OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.
[20]             OJ L 136, 31.5.1999, p. 1
[21]             OJ L 292, 15.11.1996, p. 2
[22]             ABM: Activity-Based Management –—– ABB: Activity-Based
Budgeting.
[23]             As referred to in Article 49(6)(a) or (b) of the
Financial Regulation.
[24]             Details of management modes and references to the
Financial Regulation may be found on the BudgWeb site: http://www.cc.cec/budg/man/budgmanag/budgmanag_en.html.
[25]             As referred to in Article 185 of the Financial
Regulation.
[26]               Diff. = Differentiated appropriations / Non-diff. =
Non-Differentiated Appropriations.
[27]               EFTA: European Free Trade Association. .
[28]               Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential
candidate countries from the Western Balkans.
[29]               Outputs are products and services to be supplied
(e.g.: number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.).
[30]               As described in Section 1.4.2. "‘"Specific
objective(s)…’.
[31]               CA= Contract Agent; INT= agency staff ("(‘("Intérimaire");’);");
JED= "‘"Jeune Expert en Délégation’ (Young Experts in
Delegations); LA= Local Agent; SNE= Seconded National Expert; .
[32]               Under
the ceiling for external personnel from operational
appropriations (former "‘"BA’ lines).
[33]               Essentially for Structural Funds, European Agricultural
Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and European Fisheries Fund (EFF).
[34]               See points 19 and 24 of the Inter-institutional
Agreement.
[35]               As regards traditional own resources (customs duties,
sugar levies), the amounts indicated must be net amounts, i.e. gross amounts
after deduction of 25 % for collection costs.