CELEX: 52013PC0867
Language: en
Date: 2013-12-06
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the Accession of the European Union to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES)

|
			
		
		
		52013PC0867
		
			Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the Accession of the European Union to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) /* COM/2013/0867 final - 2013/0418 (NLE) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
The Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) entered into force in 1975
and has now 178 Parties (including all EU Member States). Its aim is to ensure
that international trade in specimens of wild animals and plants does not
threaten their survival. It covers about 35 000 species, which are listed in
three Appendices, according to the degree of protection they need. All import,
export, re-export and introduction from the sea of species covered by the
Convention has to be authorized through a licensing system. 
The initial text of the Convention foresaw
that CITES membership would be limited to States only. At the second
extraordinary meeting of the Conference of the CITES Parties in Gaborone, Botswana, on 30 April 1983, an amendment to the Convention was agreed. It
consists of the addition of five paragraphs (numbered from 2 to 6 below) to
Article XXI as follows:
1.     
The present Convention shall be open
indefinitely for accession. Instruments of accession shall be deposited with
the Depositary Government
2.     
This Convention shall be open for
accession by regional economic integration organizations constituted by
sovereign States which have competence in respect of the negotiation,
conclusion and implementation of international agreements in matters
transferred to them by their Member States and covered by this Convention.
3.     
In their instruments of accession, such
organization shall declare the extent of their competence with respect to the
matters governed by the Convention. These organizations shall also inform the
Depositary Government of any substantial modification in the extent of their
competence. Notifications by regional economic integration organizations
concerning their competence with respect to matters governed by this Convention
and modifications thereto shall be distributed to the Parties by the Depositary
Government.
4.     
In matters within their competence, such
regional economic integration organizations shall exercise the rights and
fulfil the obligations which this Convention attributes to their Member States,
which are Parties to the Convention. In such cases the Member States of the
organizations shall not be entitled to exercise such rights individually.
5.     
In the fields of their competence,
regional economic integration organizations shall exercise their right to vote
with a number of votes equal to the number of their Member States which are
Parties to the Convention. Such organizations shall not exercise their right to
vote if their Member States exercise theirs, and vice versa.
6.     
Any reference to "Party" in the
sense used in Article 1(h) of this Convention, to
"State"/"States" or to "State Party"/State
Parties" to the Convention shall be construed as including a reference to
any regional economic integration organization having competence in respect of
the negotiation, conclusion and application of international agreements in
matters covered by this Convention.
This amendment (“the Gaborone amendment”)
entered into force on 29 November 2013, after its ratification by two-thirds of the 80 countries that were Parties at the time of
adoption of the amendment. The European Union has been to date an observer to
CITES and the entry into force of the Gaborone amendment now allows the
European Union to become a Party to CITES. 
The matters covered by CITES relate to areas
(protection of the environment, trade, internal market, customs) which are
subject to Union law. CITES provisions have been implemented in a harmonized manner
at EU level since 1984 and are now regulated through Council Regulation (EC) No
338/97 and various Commission Regulations (Commission Regulation (EC) No
865/2006, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 792/2012 and Commission
Implementing Regulation (EU) No 578/2013).
The accession of the European Union to CITES
is a logical and necessary step to ensure that the European Union is fully able
to pursue its objectives under its environmental policy. 
The proposal for the Council Decision aims at
approving the accession of the European Union to CITES and at calling upon the President of the Council to designate the person empowered to
proceed, on behalf of the European Union, to the deposit of the instrument of
accession as provided for in Article XXI (1) of the Convention and of the
declaration of competence provided for in Article XXI (3).
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS
WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
Not relevant.
3.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION 
CITES, like other Multilateral
Environmental Agreements (MEAs) administered by UNEP, is financed through
assessed contributions paid by all Parties and that are based on the UN Scale
of Assessment adopted every three years by the General Assembly.
It is expected that for CITES as for other
global MEAs, the CoP will decide that, following the accession of the European
Union to CITES, the EU should pay 2.5% of the total amount of the CITES Trust
fund annually. 
The next CoP will only meet in 2016 but the
EU will be expected to make a contribution in 2014 and 2015 (approximately EUR
112 000, 2.5% of the total amount of the CITES Trust fund for 2015), in line
with the practice that Parties should contribute as soon as they accede. 
2013/0418 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
on the Accession of the European Union to
the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
Flora (CITES)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 192 and Article 207,
in conjunction with Article 218(6)(a), thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
Having regard to the consent of the
European Parliament,
Whereas:
(1)       The Convention on
International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) to
which 178 countries, including all Member States, are a party, is a major
international instrument aiming at protecting endangered
species of fauna and flora through controls on international trade in specimens
of those species.
(2)       The Gaborone Amendment to
CITES, adopted by a special Conference of the Parties in
Gaborone, Botswana, in 1983, modified Article XXI of
the Convention so that access to the Convention, previously limited to States,
was opened to regional economic integration organizations constituted by
sovereign States which have competence in respect of the negotiation,
conclusion and implementation of international agreements in matters
transferred to them by their Member States and covered by this Convention. The Gaborone amendment to CITES entered into force on 29 November 2013.
(3)       The
matters covered by CITES relate to the protection of the environment and trade.
These are areas in which the Union is competent for the negotiation, conclusion
and implementation of international agreements. The provisions of CITES have
been implemented uniformly in all Member States since 1 January 1984. They are
now regulated through Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97[1] and Commission
Regulation (EC) No 865/2006[2].

(4)       Accession to CITES by the
European Union will enable it to play a full role in the work of the Convention
and will legally bind the European Union and all its Member States to implement
and enforce the Convention. It will create formal responsibilities for the
European Union so as to make the European Union as a Party accountable to other
Parties for its implementation of the Convention.
(5)       The European Union should
therefore accede to the CITES Convention,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: 
Article 1
The accession of the European Union to the Convention on International Trade in
Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora is hereby
approved on behalf of the Union. 
The text of the Convention is attached to
this Decision.
Article 2
The President of the Council shall
designate the person empowered to proceed, on behalf of the European Union, to the
deposit of the instrument of accession provided for in Article XXI (1) of the
Convention, in order to express the consent of the European Union to be bound
by the Convention. At the same time, the designated person shall deposit the
declaration set out in the Annex to this Decision, in accordance with Article
XXI (3) of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora.
Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on .[3]
Done at Brussels,
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
1.           FRAMEWORK OF THE
PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
              1.1.    Title of the proposal/initiative 
              1.2.    Policy
area(s) concerned in the ABM/ABB structure
              1.3.    Nature
of the proposal/initiative 
              1.4.    Objective(s)

              1.5.    Grounds
for the proposal/initiative 
              1.6.    Duration
and financial impact 
              1.7.    Management
mode(s) envisaged 
2.           MANAGEMENT MEASURES 
              2.1.    Monitoring
and reporting rules 
              2.2.    Management
and control system 
              2.3.    Measures
to prevent fraud and irregularities 
3.           ESTIMATED FINANCIAL
IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
              3.1.    Heading(s)
of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected 
              3.2.    Estimated
impact on expenditure 
              3.2.1. Summary of
estimated impact on expenditure 
              3.2.2. Estimated impact
on operational appropriations 
              3.2.3. Estimated impact
on appropriations of an administrative nature
              3.2.4. Compatibility
with the current multiannual financial framework
              3.2.5. Third-party contributions

              3.3.    Estimated impact on revenue
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
1.           FRAMEWORK OF THE
PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
1.1.        Title of the
proposal/initiative 
Council Decision on the Accession of the European Union to the
Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora
(CITES)
1.2.        Policy area(s) concerned
in the ABM/ABB structure[4] 
07 Environment
1.3.        Nature of the
proposal/initiative 
x The proposal/initiative relates to a new action 
¨ The proposal/initiative relates to a new action
following a pilot project/preparatory action[5]

¨ The proposal/initiative relates to the extension of
an existing action 
¨ The proposal/initiative relates to an action
redirected towards a new action 
1.4.        Objective(s)
1.4.1.     The Commission's multiannual
strategic objective(s) targeted by the proposal/initiative 
EU 2020 Strategy - Resource-efficient, smart and inclusive growth
1.4.2.     Specific objective(s) and
ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned 
Specific objective No
2.1 Global environmental affairs 
ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned
(ABB code: 0702)
1.4.3.     Expected result(s) and
impact
Specify the effects
which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups targeted.
CITES membership would also provide the European Union with a stronger
institutional basis for contributing towards CITES projects and for assisting
individual Parties in their capacity building programmes. Furthermore, the
European Union would contribute to the running costs of the Convention through
the budget by paying a percentage rate of the core budget. The European Union,
as a Party, would ensure a coherent EU position. Accession would enable the
Commission on behalf of the European Union to lead negotiations and to be a
catalyst in achieving a balanced compromise between the 28 Member States
positions. 
1.4.4.     Indicators of results and
impact 
Specify the indicators for monitoring implementation
of the proposal/initiative.
Level of EU influence on decisions taken by multilateral
environmental agreements and processes, participation in the regular CITES
meetings (Conference of the Parties, Standing Committee, Animals and Plants
Committees) and subsequent implementation of CITES decisions in EU law
1.5.        Grounds for the
proposal/initiative 
1.5.1.     Requirement(s) to be met in
the short or long term 
Once the Decision is adopted by the Council, the person empowered by
the President of the Council will deposit the instrument of accession to the
depositary government of the CITES Convention. 
1.5.2.     Added value of EU involvement

EU accession to CITES will allow the EU to increase its status in a
Multilateral environment agreement with direct relevance to the acquis in the
area of environment.
1.5.3.     Lessons learned from
similar experiences in the past 
Enhanced status of the EU in international conventions reinforces
the EU position and its influence in the areas covered
1.5.4.     Compatibility and possible
synergy with other appropriate instruments 
CITES provisions are already implemented in EU law (cf. Council
Regulation 338/97 and associated Commission Implementing Regulations). The
accession of the EU to CITES will reinforce the synergies with the EU
legislation. 
1.6.        Duration and financial
impact 
¨ Proposal/initiative of limited
duration 
–     
¨  Proposal/initiative in effect from [DD/MM]YYYY to [DD/MM]YYYY 
–     
¨  Financial impact from YYYY to YYYY 
X Proposal/initiative of unlimited duration
–     
Implementation with a start-up period from YYYY
to YYYY,
–     
followed by full-scale operation.
1.7.        Management mode(s) planned[6] 
For the 2013 budget – Not applicable
¨ Centralised direct management by the Commission 
¨ Centralised indirect management with the delegation of implementation tasks to:
–     
¨  executive agencies 
–     
¨  bodies set up by the Communities[7]

–     
¨  national public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service mission 
–     
¨  persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions
pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union and identified in the
relevant basic act within the meaning of Article 49 of the Financial Regulation

¨ Shared management with the Member States 
¨ Decentralised management with third countries 
¨ Joint management with international organisations (to be specified)
–       If more than one management mode is
indicated, please provide details in the "Comments" section.
From the 2014 budget
x Direct management by the
Commission
–     
x by its departments, including by its staff in
the Union delegations; 
–     
¨  by the executive agencies; 
¨ Shared management with the Member States 
¨ Indirect management by delegating implementation tasks to:
–     
¨ third countries or the bodies they have designated;
–     
¨ international organisations and their agencies (to be specified);
–     
¨the EIB and the European Investment Fund;
–     
¨ bodies referred to in Articles 208 and 209 of the Financial
Regulation;
–     
¨ public law bodies;
–     
¨ bodies governed by private law with a public service mission to the
extent that they provide adequate financial guarantees;
–     
¨ bodies governed by the private law of a Member State that are entrusted with the implementation of a public-private partnership and that
provide adequate financial guarantees;
–     
¨ persons entrusted with the implementation of specific actions in
the CFSP pursuant to Title V of the TEU, and identified in the relevant basic
act.
–       If more than one management mode is
indicated, please provide details in the "Comments" section.
2.           MANAGEMENT MEASURES 
2.1.        Monitoring and reporting
rules 
Specify frequency
and conditions. 
Budget of international conventions are monitored by their
conference of the parties, in addition to following UN rules for their
management (UNEP being a trustee for the CITES trust fund).
2.2.        Management and control
system 
2.2.1.     Risk(s) identified 
CITES Budget is audited at regular intervals as part of the UN
scheme.
2.2.2.     Information concerning the
internal control system set up 
See 2.2.1. above
2.2.3.     Estimate of the costs and
benefits of the controls and assessment of the expected level of risk of error 
N/A
2.3.        Measures to prevent fraud
and irregularities 
Specify existing or
envisaged prevention and protection measures.
See 2.2.1 above
3.           ESTIMATED FINANCIAL
IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
3.1.        Heading(s) of the
multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected 
·      Existing budget lines 
In order of
multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
 Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution 
 Number 07 02 Heading "Environment Policy at Union and International Level" || Diff./non-diff. ([8])   || from EFTA countries[9]   || from candidate countries[10]   || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 21(2)(b) of the Financial Regulation 
 4 || 07 02 04 – Contribution to multilateral environmental agreements || Diff || NO || NO || NO || NO 
·      New budget lines requested (N/A) – Not applicable
In order of multiannual financial framework
headings and budget lines.
 Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution 
 Number […][Heading………………………………………...……….] || Diff./non-diff. || from EFTA countries || from candidate countries || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 21(2)(b) of the Financial Regulation 
   || […][XX.YY.YY.YY]   ||   || YES/NO || YES/NO || YES/NO || YES/NO 
3.2.        Estimated impact on
expenditure 
[This section
should be filled in using spreadsheet on budget data of an
administrative nature (second document in annex to this financial statement) and uploaded
to CISNET for interservice consultation purposes.]
3.2.1.     Summary of estimated impact
on expenditure 
EUR 
 Heading of multiannual financial framework || 4 || Global Europe 
 DG: ENV ||   ||   || Year N[11]   || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
  Operational appropriations || 2014 || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2018 || 2019 || 2020 || Unlimited duration 
 07 02 04 || Commitments || (1) || 112,000 || 112,000 || 112,000 || 115,000 || 115,000 || 117,000 || 117,000 || 800,000 
 Payments || (2) || 112,000 || 112,000 || 112,000 || 115,000 || 115,000 || 117,000 || 117,000 || 800,000 
 Number of budget line || Commitments || (1a) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (2a) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope of specific programmes[12] - not applicable   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Number of budget line ||   || (3) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations for DG ENV || Commitments || =1+1a +3 || 112,000 || 112,000 || 112,000 || 115,000 || 115,000 || 117,000 || 117,000 || 800,000 
 Payments || =2+2a +3 || 112,000 || 112,000 || 112,000 || 115,000 || 115,000 || 117,000 || 117,000 || 800,000 
  TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (5) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations for HEADING 4 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || =4+ 6 || 112,000 || 112,000 || 112,000 || 115,000 || 115,000 || 117,000 || 117,000 || 800,000 
 Payments || =5+ 6 || 112,000 || 112,000 || 112,000 || 115,000 || 115,000 || 117,000 || 117,000 || 800,000 
If more than one heading is affected by the proposal /
initiative:
  TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (5) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 4 of the multiannual financial framework (Reference amount) || Commitments || =4+ 6 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || =5+ 6 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Heading of multiannual financial framework || 5 || " Administrative expenditure " – not applicable 
EUR million (to three decimal places)
   ||   ||   || Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 DG: ENV || 
  Human resources ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  Other administrative expenditure ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL DG <…….> || Appropriations ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations for HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || (Total commitments = Total payments) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
EUR million (to three decimal places)
   ||   ||   || Year N[13]   || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 5 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
3.2.2.     Estimated impact on
operational appropriations 
–     
¨  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational
appropriations 
–     
X  The proposal/initiative requires the use of
operational appropriations, as explained below:
Commitment appropriations in EUR
 Indicate objectives and outputs   ò ||   ||   || Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 OUTPUTS 
 Type[14]   || Average cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No || Cost || No total || Total cost 
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 1 Global environmental affairs[15] ...   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - Output || Conference report || 112,000 || 1 || 112,000 || 1 || 112,000 || 1 || 112,000 || 1 || 115,000 || 1 || 115,000 || 1 || 117,000 || 1 || 117,000 ||   || 800,000 
 - Output ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - Output ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Subtotal for specific objective No 1 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL COST ||   || 112,000 ||   || 112,000 ||   || 112,000 ||   || 115,000 ||   || 115,000 ||   || 117,000 ||   || 117,000 ||   || 800,000 
3.2.3.     Estimated impact on
appropriations of an administrative nature
3.2.3.1.  Summary

–     
x   The proposal/initiative does not require the
use of appropriations of an administrative nature 
–     
¨  The proposal/initiative requires the use of appropriations of an
administrative nature, as explained below:
EUR million (to
three decimal places)
   || Year N[16]   || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Human resources ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Other administrative expenditure ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Subtotal HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Outside HEADING 5[17] of the multiannual financial framework   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Human resources ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Other expenditure of an administrative nature ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Subtotal outside HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
The human resources
appropriations required will be met by appropriations from the DG that are
already assigned to management of the action and/or have been redeployed within
the DG, together if necessary with any additional allocation which may be
granted to the managing DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the
light of budgetary constraints.
3.2.3.2.   Estimated
requirements of human resources 
–     
X  The proposal/initiative does not require the
use of human resources. 
–     
¨  The proposal/initiative requires the use of human resources, as
explained below:
Estimate to be expressed in full time
equivalent units
 ||   || Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) 
 ||  Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary staff) ||   ||   
 || XX 01 01 01 (Headquarters and Commission’s Representation Offices) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 || XX 01 01 02 (Delegations) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 || XX 01 05 01 (Indirect research) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 || 10 01 05 01 (Direct research) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  External staff (in Full Time Equivalent unit: FTE)[18]   || 
 || XX 01 02 01 (CA, SNE, INT from the "global envelope") ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 || XX 01 02 02 (CA, LA, SNE, INT and JED in the delegations) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 || XX 01 04 yy[19]   || - at Headquarters   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 || - Delegations ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 || XX 01 05 02 (CA, SNE, INT - Indirect research) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 || 10 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE - Direct research) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 || Other budget lines (specify) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 || TOTAL ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
XX is the policy
area or budget title concerned.
The human resources
required will be met by staff from the DG who are already assigned to
management of the action and/or have been redeployed within the DG, together if
necessary with any additional allocation which may be granted to the managing
DG under the annual allocation procedure and in the light of budgetary
constraints.
Description of
tasks to be carried out:
 Officials and temporary staff ||   
 External staff ||   
3.2.4.     Compatibility with the
current multiannual financial framework 
–     
x   Proposal/initiative is compatible the current
multiannual financial framework.
–     
¨  Proposal/initiative will entail reprogramming of the relevant
heading in the multiannual financial framework.
Explain what reprogramming is required,
specifying the budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
[…]
–     
¨  Proposal/initiative requires application of the flexibility
instrument or revision of the multiannual financial framework[20].
Explain what is required, specifying the
headings and budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
[…]
3.2.5.     Third-party contributions 
–     
The proposal/initiative does not provide for
co-financing by third parties. 
Appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
   || Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || Total 
 Specify the co-financing body || NA ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations cofinanced ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
3.3.        Estimated impact on
revenue 
–     
x   Proposal/initiative has no financial impact
on revenue.
–     
¨  Proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:
–                   
¨         on own resources 
–                   
¨         on miscellaneous revenue 
EUR million (to three decimal places)
 Budget revenue line: || Appropriations available for the current financial year || Impact of the proposal/initiative[21]   
 Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || Enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) 
 Article …………. ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
For miscellaneous
‘assigned’ revenue, specify the budget expenditure line(s) affected.
[…]
Specify the method for
calculating the impact on revenue.
[…]
[1]               Council
Regulation (EC) No 338/97 of 9 December 1996 on the protection of species of
wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (OJ L 61, 3.3.1997, p. 1).
[2]               Commission
Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 of 4 May 2006 laying down detailed rules concerning
the implementation of Council Regulation (EC) No 338/97 on the protection of
species of wild fauna and flora by regulating trade therein (OJ L 166, 19.6.2006, p. 1).
[3]               The
date of entry into force of the Agreement for the European Union will be
published in the Official Journal of the European Union by the General
Secretariat of the Council.
[4]               ABM:
activity-based management – ABB: activity-based budgeting.
[5]               As
referred to in Article 54(2)(a) or (b) of the Financial Regulation.
[6]               Details
of management modes and references to the Financial Regulation may be found on
the BudgWeb site: http://www.cc.cec/budg/man/budgmanag/budgmanag_en.html
[7]               As
referred to in Article 185 of the Financial Regulation.
[8]               Diff.
= Differentiated appropriations / Non-Diff. = Non-differentiated
appropriations.
[9]               EFTA:
European Free Trade Association. 
[10]             Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential
candidate countries from the Western Balkans.
[11]             Year N is the year in which implementation of the
proposal/initiative starts.
[12]             Technical and/or administrative assistance and
expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions
(former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.
[13]             Year N is the year in which implementation of the
proposal/initiative starts.
[14]             Outputs are products and services to be supplied (e.g.:
number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.).
[15]             As described in point 1.4.2. ‘Specific objective(s)…’ 
[16]             Year N is the year in which implementation of the
proposal/initiative starts.
[17]             Technical and/or administrative assistance and
expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions
(former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.
[18]             CA= Contract Staff; LA = Local Staff; SNE= Seconded
National Expert; INT = agency staff; JED= Junior Experts in Delegations). 
[19]             Sub-ceiling for external staff covered by operational
appropriations (former "BA" lines).
[20]             See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional
Agreement (for the period 2007-2013).
[21]             As regards traditional own resources (customs duties,
sugar levies), the amounts indicated must be net amounts, i.e. gross amounts
after deduction of 25% for collection costs.
ANNEX
to the
Proposal for a Council Decision
on the Accession of the European
Union to the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild
Fauna and Flora (CITES)
DECLARATION
BY THE EUROPEAN UNION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE XXI (PARAGRAPH 3) OF THE
CONVENTION ON INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN ENDANGERED SPECIES OF WILD FAUNA AND FLORA
"The
European Union declares that, in accordance with the Treaty on the Functioning
of the European Union, and in particular Article 191 thereof, it is competent
for entering into international agreements, and for implementing the
obligations resulting therefrom, which contribute to the pursuit of the
following objectives:
–                        
preserving, protecting and improving the
quality of the environment;
–                        
protecting human health;
–                        
prudent and rational utilisation of natural
resources;
–                        
promoting measures at international level to
deal with regional or worldwide environmental problems, including climate
change.
Moreover,
the European Union adopts measures at European Union level for the proper
functioning of its internal market.
The European
Union has exclusive competence with regard to measures concerning the Customs
Union between its Member States and with regard to its common commercial
policy. 
The European
Union declares that it has already adopted legal instruments, binding on its
Member States, covering matters governed by this Convention, in particular but
not limited to Council Regulation
(EC) No 338/97 of 9
December 1996 on the protection of species of wild fauna and flora by regulating
trade therein and the implementing Commission Regulation (EC) No 865/2006 of 4
May 2006.[1]
Moreover the European Union declares
that it is responsible for the performance of those obligations resulting from
the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and
Flora which are covered by Union law.
The exercise of Union competence is, by
its nature, subject to continuous development." 
[1]               OJ L
61, 3.3.1997, p. 1 and OJ L 166, 19.6.2006, p. 1.