CELEX: 62010FN0045
Language: en
Date: 2010-06-11 00:00:00
Title: Case F-45/10: Action brought on 11 June 2010 — Kaser/Commission

14.8.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 221/60
            
         Action brought on 11 June 2010 — Kaser/Commission
   (Case F-45/10)
   ()
   2010/C 221/96
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Ferdinand Kaser (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Schober, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission
   
      The subject matter and description of the proceedings
   
   First, annulment of the Decision of the European Commission CMS 07/046 removing applicant from his post, without reduction of the pension rights, witch took effect on 15 August 2009 and the annulment of all decisions taken against the applicant in the period between September 2003 until the removing from the post and, second, a claim for damages.
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claim that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the Decision CMS 07/046 due to harassment, mismanagement and the abuse of the fundamental right to be heard;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul all decisions taken by the Appointing Authority against the applicant between the period September 2003 until the removing from the post due to harassment and mismanagement due to the abuse of the right of the applicant to be heard;
            
         
               —
            
            
               enable a hearing of the applicant according to Article 7(1) and Article 24 of the Staff Regulations, and to refer to the submitted requests in February 2008 and March 2008;
            
         
               —
            
            
               grant a symbolic compensation of one (1) Euro to the applicant in order to compensate his moral and professional prejudice he suffered as exposed in the present complaint, as far as the objective of such a complaint is not money but recognition of dignity and professional reputation of the applicant.