CELEX: 62018TN0231
Language: en
Date: 2018-04-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-231/18: Action brought on 4 April 2018 — Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO — Lupu (Djili)

201805250501897042018/C 200/582312018TC20020180611EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180404464611Case T-231/18: Action brought on 4 April 2018 — Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO — Lupu (Djili)
 ---documentbreak--- C2002018EN4610120180404EN0058461461Action brought on 4 April 2018 — Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam v EUIPO — Lupu (Djili)
   (Case T-231/18)2018/C 200/58Language in which the application was lodged: English
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Et Djili Soy Dzhihangir Ibryam (Dulovo, Bulgaria) (represented by: C. Romiţan, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Victor Lupu (Bucharest, Romania)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark Djili — Application for registration No 15 497 662
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 31 January 2018 in Case R 1902/2017-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
            —
         
         
            annul the contested decision;
         
      
            —
         
         
            reject Lupu Victor’s appeal;
         
      
            —
         
         
            order the opponent and the appellant Lupu Victor to bear the costs of the proceedings.
         
      
      Pleas in law
   
   
            —
         
         
            The Board of Appeal erred in finding that there was an aural similarity between the signs;
         
      
            —
         
         
            The Board of Appeal erred in finding that the conceptual comparison had no relevance in the case.