CELEX: 62014CN0455
Language: en
Date: 2014-09-29 00:00:00
Title: Case C-455/14 P: Appeal brought on 29 September 2014 by H against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 10 July 2014 in Case T-271/10: H v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European Police Mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina ( ‘EUPM’ )

15.12.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 448/10
            
         Appeal brought on 29 September 2014 by H against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 10 July 2014 in Case T-271/10: H v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European Police Mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina (‘EUPM’)
   (Case C-455/14 P)
   (2014/C 448/13)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: H (represented by: M. Velardo, avvocato)
   
      Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               set aside the order of the General Court of 10 July 2014 in Case T-271/10 H v. Council of the European Union, European Commission and ‘EUPM’, insofar as it rejects the Applicant’s action seeking the annulment of the decision of 7 April 2010, signed by the Head of the personnel of the EUPM, by which the Applicant was redeployed to the post of ‘Criminal Justice Adviser-Prosecutor’ in the regional office of Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and, if necessary, of the decision of 30 April 2010, signed by the Head of Mission, referred to in Article 6 of the Council Decision 2009/906/CFSP of 8 December 2009, on the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) (1), and second, for damages;
            
         
               —
            
            
               refer the case back to the General Court;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant at first instance to pay the costs of these proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The Appellant is putting forward the following pleas in law:
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of the right of defence
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 114 of the Rules of Procedure
            
         
               —
            
            
               Error in law
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of European Law
            
         
      (1)  OJ L 322, p. 22