CELEX: 62016CB0007
Language: en
Date: 2016-07-05 00:00:00
Title: Case C-7/16: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo — Spain) — Banco Popular Español SA, PL Salvador SARL v María Rita Giráldez Villar, Modesto Martínez Baz (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms — Assignment of a claim — Right of the debtor to extinguish his debt — Conditions governing the exercise of that right)

19.9.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 343/17
            
         Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 5 July 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo — Spain) — Banco Popular Español SA, PL Salvador SARL v María Rita Giráldez Villar, Modesto Martínez Baz
   (Case C-7/16) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms - Assignment of a claim - Right of the debtor to extinguish his debt - Conditions governing the exercise of that right))
   (2016/C 343/26)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Referring court
   
   Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 11 de Vigo
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicants: Banco Popular Español SA, PL Salvador SARL
   
      Defendants: María Rita Giráldez Villar, Modesto Martínez Baz
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as meaning that it does not apply to national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, relating to the right of the person owing a debt that has been assigned by the creditor to a third party to extinguish his debt by reimbursing to that third party the price paid by the latter in respect of that assignment.
   
      (1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.