CELEX: 62007TN0481
Language: en
Date: 2007-12-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-481/07: Action brought on 21 December 2007 — Deltalinqs and SVZ v Commission of the European Communities

8.3.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 64/43
            
         Action brought on 21 December 2007 — Deltalinqs and SVZ v Commission of the European Communities
   (Case T-481/07)
   (2008/C 64/72)
   Language of the case: Dutch
   Parties
   
      Applicants: Deltalinqs and SVZ, Havenondernemersvereniging Rotterdam (Rotterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Meulenbelt, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the Commission's decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the Commission to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   The applicants challenge the Commission's decision of 10 May 2007 (OJ 2007 C 227, p. 4) concerning the Flemish rules on support for inter-modal transport via inland waterways (Aid measure N 682/2006 — Belgium). In the contested decision the Commission regards the support measure as compatible with the common market and decides not to raise any objection.
   In support of their application, the applicants claim that there has been an infringement of the principle of non-discrimination laid down in Council Regulation (EEC) No 1107/70 of 4 June 1970 on the granting of aids for transport by rail, road and inland waterway (OJ English Special Edition, 1970(II), p. 362) and Articles 12 and 73 EC. They state that the subsidy is available on the transhipment of containers in Flemish inland ports when the containers enter or leave the European Union via a Flemish sea port but not when a sea port is in another Member State. They claim that this constitutes discrimination on grounds of nationality.
   They also argue that the subsidy leads to a distortion of competition, as it seriously disadvantages all ports in north-west Europe which trade with the Flemish hinterland, and particularly the port of Rotterdam.
   They also plead infringement of the obligation to investigate and state reasons. They maintain that the Commission has failed to investigate the consequences for competition and to explain why an economic investigation was not necessary.