CELEX: 62014TN0344
Language: en
Date: 2014-05-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-344/14: Action brought on 21 May 2014  — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM (Deluxe)

21.7.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 235/29
            
         Action brought on 21 May 2014 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM (Deluxe)
   (Case T-344/14)
   2014/C 235/40
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by M. Kefferpütz and A. Wrage, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 6 March 2014 in Case R 1223/2013-1;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Declare that the provisions of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 do not preclude the publication of the mark applied for;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Refer application No 01 1 4 27  507 back to the defendant so that the registration procedure may be resumed;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs in respect of the appeal proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark including the word element ‘Deluxe’ for goods and services in Classes 5, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 33 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 4 27  507
   
      Decision of the Examiner: the application was rejected
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009