CELEX: 62013TA0670
Language: en
Date: 2015-11-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-670/13 P: Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2015 — Commission v D’Agostino (Appeal — Cross-appeal — Civil service — Member of the contract staff — Decision not to renew the contract — Duty of care — Infringement of Article 12a(2) of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the file)

18.1.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 16/28
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 24 November 2015 — Commission v D’Agostino
   (Case T-670/13 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Cross-appeal - Civil service - Member of the contract staff - Decision not to renew the contract - Duty of care - Infringement of Article 12a(2) of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons - Distortion of the file))
   (2016/C 016/34)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, and subsequently by G. Gattinara, Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Luigi D’Agostino (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), (represented by: M.-A. Lucas, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 23 October 2013 in Case F-93/12 D’Agostino v Commission (F-93/12, ECR-SC, EU:F:2013:155), seeking to have that judgment set aside.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 23 October 2013 in D’Agostino v Commission (F-93/12) in so far the Civil Service Tribunal incorrectly applied the duty of care;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Dismisses the remainder of the main appeal;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment in D’Agostino v Commission in so far as the Civil Service Tribunal failed to adjudicate on the first part of the second ground of appeal and distorted it;
            
         
               4.
            
            
               Dismisses the cross-appeal for the remainder;
            
         
               5.
            
            
               Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;
            
         
               6.
            
            
               Reserves the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 78, 15.3.2014.