CELEX: 62021CN0430
Language: en
Date: 2021-07-14 00:00:00
Title: Case C-430/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova (Romania) lodged on 14 July 2021 — RS

27.9.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 391/10
            
         
      Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Craiova (Romania) lodged on 14 July 2021 — RS
      (Case C-430/21)
      (2021/C 391/16)
      Language of the case: Romanian
      
         Referring court
      
      Curtea de Apel Craiova
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant/Complainant: RS
      
         Questions referred
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Does the principle of the independence of the judiciary, enshrined in the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, read in conjunction with Article 2 TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, preclude a provision of national law, such as that contained in Article 148(2) of the Romanian Constitution, as interpreted by the Curtea Constituțională (Constitutional Court, Romania) in Decision No 390/2021, according to which national courts have no jurisdiction to examine the conformity with EU law of a provision of national law that has been found to be constitutional by a decision of the Constitutional Court?
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Does the principle of the independence of the judiciary, enshrined in the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, read in conjunction with Article 2 TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, preclude a provision of national law, such as that contained in Article 99(ș) of Legea nr. 303/2004 privind statutul judecătorilor și procurorilor (Law No 303/2004 on the rules governing judges and prosecutors), which provides for the initiation of disciplinary proceedings and the application of disciplinary penalties in respect of a judge for failure to comply with a decision of the Constitutional Court, where that judge is called upon to acknowledge the primacy of EU law over the grounds of a decision of the Constitutional Court, that provision of national law depriving him or her of the possibility of applying a judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union which he or she regards as taking precedence?
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Does the principle of the independence of the judiciary, enshrined in the second subparagraph of Article 19(1) TEU, read in conjunction with Article 2 TEU and Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, preclude a national judicial practice which precludes a judge, on pain of incurring disciplinary liability, from applying the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in criminal proceedings in relation to a complaint regarding the reasonable duration of criminal proceedings, governed by Article 4881 of the Romanian Code of Criminal Procedure?