CELEX: C1996/180/07
Language: en
Date: 1996-06-22 00:00:00
Title: JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Sixth Chamber) of 14 March 1996 in Case C-315/94 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Arbeitsgericht Bielefeld): Peter de Vos v. Stadt Bielefeld (Freedom of movement for persons - Military service - Social advantage)

No C 180/4            EN                    Official Journal of the European Communities                                     22 . 6 . 96
 Kingdom of Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of                  Article 7 (1 ) and (2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the
 Great Britain and Northern Ireland ( OJ No L 304, 1978 ,                Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for
 p . 1 and — in its amended form — p . 77 ) — the Court ( Fifth         workers within the Community must be interpreted as
 Chamber ), composed of D. A. O. Edward ( President of                  meaning that a worker who is a national of one Member
 Chamber ), J. -P. Puissochet, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida                State and is employed in the territory of another Member
  ( Rapporteur ), C. Gulmann and P. Jann, Judges; N. Fennelly,          State is not entitled to have payment of contributions
 Advocate-General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a                      (employer's and employee's contributions) to the
 judgment on 14 March 1996, in which it rules :                         supplementary old-age and survivors ' pension scheme for
                                                                        workers in the public service continued, at the same level as
                                                                        would have been payable if the employment relationship
 Article 47 (1 ) of the Convention of 27 September 1968 on              had not been suspended because of his call-up for military
 Jurisdiction and the Enforcement ofJudgments in Civil and              service, where nationals of that State employed in the public
  Commercial Matters, as amended by the Convention of                   service are so entitled when performing military service in
 9 October 1978 on the Accession of the Kingdom of                      that State.
 Denmark, Ireland and the United Kingdom of Great Britain
 and Northern Ireland, is to be interpreted as meaning that,
 where the domestic procedural rules so permit, proof of                (') OJ No C 380, 31 . 12 . 1994 .
 service of the judgment may be produced after the
 application has been made, in particular during the course of
 appeal proceedings subsequently brought by the party
 against whom enforcement is sought, provided that that
 party is given a reasonable period of time in which to satisfy
 the judgment voluntarily and that the party seeking
 enforcement bears all costs unnecessarily incurred.
 (') OJ No C 351 , 10 . 12 . 1994 .
                                                                                       JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                                                ( Fifth Chamber )
                                                                                               of 14 March 1996
                                                                        in Case C-238/95 : Commission of the European
                                                                                      Communities v. Italian Republic ( ! )
               JUDGMENT OF THE COURT                                    (Failure to fulfil obligations — Directive 93/67/EEC —
                        ( Sixth Chamber )                               Assessment of risks to man and the environment posed by
                       of 14 March 1996
                                                                                             dangerous substances)
                                                                                                  ( 96/C 180/08 )
in Case C-3 15/94 (reference for a preliminary ruling
 from the Arbeitsgericht Bielefeld ): Peter de Vos v. Stadt
                             Bielefeld ( J )
                                                                                        (Language of the case: Italian)
 (Freedom of movement for persons — Military service —
                        Social advantage)
                          ( 96/C 180/07 )
                                                                        (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
                                                                                published in the European Court Reports)
               (Language of the case: German)
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be           In Case C-238/95 : Commission of the European
          published in the European Court Reports)                     Communities ( Agents : Laura Pignatoro and Maria
                                                                       Condou-Durande ) v. Italian Republic ( Agent: Professor
                                                                       Umberto Leanza, assisted by Pier Giorgio Ferri, avvocato
In Case C-3 1 5/94 : reference to the Court under Article 177          dello Stato ) — application for a declaration that, by failing
of the EC Treaty from the Arbeitsgericht Bielefeld                     to adopt and communicate the laws, regulations and
( Germany ) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings                administrative provisions necessary to comply with
pending before that court between Peter de Vos and Stadt               Commission Directive 93/67/EEC of 20 July 1993 laying
Bielefeld on the interpretation of Article 7 of Regulation             down the principles for assessment of risks to man and the
( EEC ) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on                environment of substances notified in accordance with
freedom of movement for workers within the Community                   Council Directive 67/548/EEC ( OJ No L 227, 1993 , p. 9 ),
( OJ, English Special Edition 1968(11 ), p . 475 ) — the Court         the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under
( Sixth Chamber), composed of C. N. Kakouris, President of             that Directive and the EC Treaty — the Court ( Fifth
the Chamber, G. Hirsch, F. A. Schockweiler, P. J. G.                   Chamber ), composed of D. A. O. Edward, President of the
Kapteyn ( Rapporteur ) and J. L. Murray, Judges; D.                    Chamber, J. -P. Puissochet ( Rapporteur ), J. C. Moitinho de
Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate-General; Registrar, R.                   Almeida, L. Sevon and M. Wathelet, Judges; N. Fennelly,
Grass, gave a judgment on 14 March 1996, the operative                 Advocate-General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a
part of which is as follows :                                          judgment on 14 March 1996 in which it: