CELEX: 62018TB0045
Language: en
Date: 2018-11-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-45/18: Order of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Novenco Building & Industry v EUIPO — Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) (NOVENCO) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark NOVENCO — Earlier EU word mark Novenco — Cancellation of the international registration — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

4.2.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 44/69
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 15 November 2018 — Novenco Building & Industry v EUIPO — Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) (NOVENCO)
      (Case T-45/18) (1)
      
      ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark NOVENCO - Earlier EU word mark Novenco - Cancellation of the international registration - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))
      (2019/C 44/90)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Novenco Building & Industry A/S (Næstved, Denmark) (represented by: A. Rasmussen, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Śliwińska and A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agents)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) Co. Ltd (Beijing, China) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)
      
         Re:
      
      First, an action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 November 2017 (Case R 2354/2016-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Novenco Building & Industry and Novenco Ventilator (Beijing) and, second, a cross-claim made against that same decision.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the main action or on the cross-claim.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Each party shall bear its own costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 104, 19.3.2018.