CELEX: 62006TB0346
Language: en
Date: 2009-02-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-346/06: Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 February 2009 — IMS v Commission (Action for annulment and for damages — Directive 98/37/EC — Machinery bearing the CE marking — Hazards to the safety of persons — National prohibition measure — Opinion of the Commission declaring the measure to be justified — Action for annulment — Withdrawal of the contested measure — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance — Inadmissibility)

18.4.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 90/26
            
         Order of the Court of First Instance of 18 February 2009 — IMS v Commission
   (Case T-346/06) (1)
   
   (Action for annulment and for damages - Directive 98/37/EC - Machinery bearing the ‘CE’ marking - Hazards to the safety of persons - National prohibition measure - Opinion of the Commission declaring the measure to be justified - Action for annulment - Withdrawal of the contested measure - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance - Inadmissibility)
   2009/C 90/42
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Industria Masetto Schio Srl (IMS) (Schio, Italy) (represented by: F. Colonna and T. Romolotti, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Zadra and D. Lawunmi, acting as Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, acting as Agent)
   
      Re:
   
   First, application for annulment of the Commission’s opinion C(2006) 3914 of 6 December 2006 concerning a prohibition measure adopted by the French authorities relating to certain IMS brand mechanical presses and, second, application for damages for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the adoption of that opinion
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The remainder of the action is dismissed as inadmissible.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The Commission is ordered to pay the costs of the interim proceedings. As to the remainder, the Commission and Industria Masetto Schio Srl (IMS) are ordered to bear half of the costs each.
            
         
               4.
            
            
               The French Republic is ordered to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 20, 27.1.2007.