CELEX: 62015TA0259
Language: en
Date: 2019-04-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-259/15: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2019 — Close and Cegelec v Parliament (Public works contracts — Tender procedure — Construction of an energy unit — Extension and refurbishment of the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg — Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer — Award of the contract to another tenderer — Selection criteria — Financial and economic capacity — Technical and professional capacity — Obligation to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment)

3.6.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 187/58
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2019 — Close and Cegelec v Parliament
      (Case T-259/15) (1)
      
      (Public works contracts - Tender procedure - Construction of an energy unit - Extension and refurbishment of the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg - Rejection of tender submitted by a tenderer - Award of the contract to another tenderer - Selection criteria - Financial and economic capacity - Technical and professional capacity - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment)
      (2019/C 187/62)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicants: SA Close (Harzé-Aywaille, Belgium), Cegelec (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-M. Rikkers and J.-L. Teheux, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by M. Rantala and M. Mraz, and subsequently by J.-M. Stenier, B. Schäfer and M. Mraz, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the Parliament’s decision of 19 March 2015 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicants in the context of the call for tenders INLO-D-UPIL-T-14-AO 4, relating to public works contracts in respect of Lot No 73 (energy unit) for the project to extend and refurbish the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg and awarding that lot to another tenderer.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1)
               
               
                  
                     Dismisses the action;
                  
               
            
                  2)
               
               
                  
                     Orders SA Close and Cegelec, on the one hand, and the European Parliament, on the other, each to bear their own costs, including the costs relating to the application for interim measures.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 236, 20.7.2015.