CELEX: 62014TN0541
Language: en
Date: 2014-04-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-541/14: Action brought on 18 April 2014 — Antica Azienda Agricola Vitivinicola Dei Conti Leone De Castris v OHIM — Vicente Gandía Pla (ILLIRIA)

8.9.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 303/56
            
         Action brought on 18 April 2014 — Antica Azienda Agricola Vitivinicola Dei Conti Leone De Castris v OHIM — Vicente Gandía Pla (ILLIRIA)
   (Case T-541/14)
   2014/C 303/67
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Antica Azienda Agricola Vitivinicola Dei Conti Leone De Castris Srl (Salice Salentino, Italy) (represented by: D. Russo, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vicente Gandía Pla SA (Chiva, Spain)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 May 2014 given in Case R 917/2013-4;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Award the applicant the costs of proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal elements ‘ILLIRIA’ for ‘wines’ in Class 33 — Community trade mark application No 1 0 5 99  033
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trade mark registration No. 8 2 99  653
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: annulled the contested decision and upheld the opposition
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.