CELEX: 62014TN0255
Language: sl
Date: 2014-04-23 00:00:00
Title: Zadeva T-255/14: Tožba, vložena 23. aprila 2014 – Aalto-korkeakoulusäätiö proti UUNT – (APPCAMPUS)

21.7.2014   
            
            
               SL
            
            
               Uradni list Evropske unije
            
            
               C 235/24
            
         Tožba, vložena 23. aprila 2014 – Aalto-korkeakoulusäätiö proti UUNT – (APPCAMPUS)
   (Zadeva T-255/14)
   2014/C 235/33
   Jezik postopka: angleščina
   
      Stranki
   
   
      Tožeča stranka: Aalto-korkeakoulusäätiö (Helsinki, Finska) (zastopnik: C. Tomás Pedro, odvetnik)
   
      Tožena stranka: Urad za usklajevanje na notranjem trgu (znamke in modeli)
   
      Predlogi
   
   Tožeča stranka Splošnemu sodišču predlaga:
   
               —
            
            
               Partially annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 January 2014 given in Case R 713/2013-2 in the part that it confirmed the decision of rejection of protection in the European Union to the International Registration 1 1 34  485„APPCAMPUS“ (word) regarding computer software, magnetic data carriers, recording discs, compact discs, DVD’s and other digital recording media in class 9 and technological services and research and design relating thereto, design and development of computer software in class 42;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.
            
         
      Tožbeni razlogi in bistvene trditve
   
   
      Zadevna znamka Skupnosti: International Registration designating the European Union No 1 1 34  485 of the word mark „APPCAMPUS“ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 38, 41 and 42
   
      Odločba preizkuševalca: Found the trade mark applied for partially not eligible for registration
   
      Odločba odbora za pritožbe: Partially annulled the contested decision
   
      Navajani tožbeni razlogi: Infringement of Articles 7(1)(c), (b) and 7(2) of the Regulation No 207/2009