CELEX: 62013CB0646
Language: en
Date: 2015-04-22 00:00:00
Title: Case C-646/13: Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Galați — Romania) — Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Brăila v E.S. (Reference fora preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Social security for migrant workers — Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 — Article 8(1) — Applicability of social security conventions between Member States — Repatriated refugee originating in a Member State — Completion of periods of employment within the territory of another Member State — Application for the grant of an old-age benefit — Application refused)

29.6.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 213/11
            
         Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 22 April 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Galați — Romania) — Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Brăila v E.S.
   (Case C-646/13) (1)
   
   ((Reference fora preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Social security for migrant workers - Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 - Article 8(1) - Applicability of social security conventions between Member States - Repatriated refugee originating in a Member State - Completion of periods of employment within the territory of another Member State - Application for the grant of an old-age benefit - Application refused))
   (2015/C 213/16)
   Language of the case: Romanian
   
      Referring court
   
   Curtea de Apel Galați
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Appellant: Casa Judeţeană de Pensii Brăila
   
      Respondent: E.S.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   Article 8(1) of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 988/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that a bilateral convention on social security benefits for nationals of one of the signatory States who had political-refugee status within the territory of the other signatory State, which was concluded at a date on which one of the two signatory States had not yet acceded to the European Union and which does not feature in Annex II to that regulation, does not remain applicable to the situation of political refugees repatriated to their State of origin prior to the conclusion of the bilateral convention and the entry into force of that regulation.
   
      (1)  OJ C 39, 8.2.2014.