CELEX: 62014TN0202
Language: en
Date: 2014-03-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-202/14: Action brought on 28 March 2014 — LR Health & Beauty Systems/OHIM — Robert McBride (LR nova pure.)

21.7.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 235/20
            
         Action brought on 28 March 2014 — LR Health & Beauty Systems/OHIM — Robert McBride (LR nova pure.)
   (Case T-202/14)
   2014/C 235/27
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH (Ahlen, Germany) (represented by: N. Weber and L. Thiel, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Robert McBride Ltd (Manchester, United Kingdom)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 January 2014 in case R 272/2013-2;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant and, if appropriate, the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the word elements ‘LR nova pure.’ for goods in Class 3 — Community trade mark application No 9 8 51  361
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: International trade mark registration of the word mark NOVA
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009