CELEX: 62018TB0607
Language: en
Date: 2019-10-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-607/18: Order of the General Court of 9 October 2019 — Essity Hygiene and Health v EUIPO (Representation of a leaf) (EU trade mark — Application for an EU figurative mark representing a leaf — Absolute ground for refusal — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

16.12.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 423/54
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 9 October 2019 — Essity Hygiene and Health v EUIPO (Representation of a leaf)
      (Case T-607/18) (1)
      
      (EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing a leaf - Absolute ground for refusal - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
      (2019/C 423/68)
      Language of the case: Swedish
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Essity Hygiene and Health AB (Gothenburg, Sweden) (represented by: U. Wennermark, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 July 2018 (Case R 2196/2017-5) concerning an application for registration of a figurative sign representing a leaf as an EU trade mark.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 436, 3.12.2018.