CELEX: 62019TN0663
Language: en
Date: 2019-09-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-663/19: Action brought on 30 September 2019 – Hasbro v EUIPO – Kreativni Dogadaji (MONOPOLY)

9.12.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 413/58
            
         
      Action brought on 30 September 2019 – Hasbro v EUIPO – Kreativni Dogadaji (MONOPOLY)
      (Case T-663/19)
      (2019/C 413/70)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Hasbro, Inc. (Pawtucket, Rhode Island, United States) (represented by: J. Moss, Barrister)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kreativni Dogadaji d.o.o. (Zagreb, Croatia)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
      
         Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark MONOPOLY – European Union trade mark No 9 071 961
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 July 2019 in Case R 1849/2017-2
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to pay the applicant’s costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Failure to properly apply Article 59(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Violation of the applicant’s right to a fair hearing.