CELEX: 62015CB0093
Language: en
Date: 2015-10-15 00:00:00
Title: Case C-93/15 P: Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015 — Banco Privado Português, SA — em liquidação, Massa Insolvente do Banco Privado Português, SA — em liquidação v European Commission (Appeal — Aid granted by the Republic of Portugal in favour of a financial institution in the form of a State guarantee underwriting a loan — Decision declaring the State aid to be incompatible with the internal market — Article 107(1) TFEU — Article 107(3)(b) TFEU — Appeal manifestly inadmissible and manifestly unfounded)

21.12.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 429/7
            
         Order of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 October 2015 — Banco Privado Português, SA — em liquidação, Massa Insolvente do Banco Privado Português, SA — em liquidação v European Commission
   (Case C-93/15 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Aid granted by the Republic of Portugal in favour of a financial institution in the form of a State guarantee underwriting a loan - Decision declaring the State aid to be incompatible with the internal market - Article 107(1) TFEU - Article 107(3)(b) TFEU - Appeal manifestly inadmissible and manifestly unfounded))
   (2015/C 429/09)
   Language of the case: Portuguese
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellants: Banco Privado Português, SA — em liquidação, Massa Insolvente do Banco Privado Português, SA — em liquidação (represented by: M. Ferreira Santos and R Leandro Vasconcelos, advogadas)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. França and L. Flynn, acting as Agents)
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Banco Privado Português SA and Massa Insolvente do Banco Privado Português SA are ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015.