CELEX: 62014CA0088
Language: en
Date: 2015-07-16 00:00:00
Title: Case C-88/14: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — European Commission v European Parliament, Council of the European Union (Actions for annulment — Regulation (EU) No 1289/2013 — Article 1(1) and (4) — Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 — Article 1(4)(f) — Article 290 TFEU — Suspension of exemption from the visa requirement — Insertion of a footnote — Amendment of the legislative act)

14.9.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 302/5
            
         Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — European Commission v European Parliament, Council of the European Union
   (Case C-88/14) (1)
   
   ((Actions for annulment - Regulation (EU) No 1289/2013 - Article 1(1) and (4) - Regulation (EC) No 539/2001 - Article 1(4)(f) - Article 290 TFEU - Suspension of exemption from the visa requirement - Insertion of a footnote - Amendment of the legislative act))
   (2015/C 302/06)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: European Commission (represented by: B. Smulders, B. Martenczuk and G. Wils, acting as Agents)
   
      Defendants: European Parliament (represented by: L. Visaggio, A. Troupiotis and A. Pospíšilová Padowska, acting as Agents)
   Council of the European Union (represented by K. Pleśniak and K. Michoel, acting as Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the defendants: Czech Republic (represented by M. Smolek, D. Hadroušek and J. Škeřík, acting as Agents)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the European Commission to pay the costs;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the Czech Republic to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.