CELEX: C2006/121/20
Language: en
Date: 2006-05-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-176/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of  6 March 2006  — Marcuccio v Commission (Officials — Social security benefits — Access to information about the existence of a medical report — Transmission after the action was brought — No need to adjudicate)

20.5.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 121/12
            
         Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 March 2006 — Marcuccio v Commission
   (Case T-176/04) (1)
   
   (Officials - Social security benefits - Access to information about the existence of a medical report - Transmission after the action was brought - No need to adjudicate)
   (2006/C 121/20)
   Language of the case: Italian
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: A. Distante, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)
   Re:
   Application for, in the first place, annulment of the Commission's implied decision rejecting the applicant's request to be sent a medical report or the written confirmation that that report does not exist; in the second place, annulment of the Commission's implied decision rejecting the complaint made about the rejection of that request and, in the third place, a declaration of the applicant's right to have the claims in his request and in his complaint granted.
   Operative part of the order
   
               1.
            
            
               There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant before the notification of the defence. The applicant is to bear his own costs incurred after the notification of the defence.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 179, 10.7.2004.