CELEX: 62016TB0877
Language: en
Date: 2017-05-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-877/16: Order of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Verschuur v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Document concerning the administrative procedure relating to State aid SA.38374 (2014/C ex 2014/NN) granted by the Netherlands to Starbucks — Refusal to grant access — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

31.7.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 249/29
            
         Order of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Verschuur v Commission
   (Case T-877/16) (1)
   
   ((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Document concerning the administrative procedure relating to State aid SA.38374 (2014/C ex 2014/NN) granted by the Netherlands to Starbucks - Refusal to grant access - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
   (2017/C 249/44)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Steven Verschuur (Baarn, Netherlands) (represented by: P. Kreijger, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz, A. Buchet and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 6455 final of 3 October 2016, rejecting the applicant’s confirmatory application for access to documents under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43).
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Steven Verschuur shall bear his own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017