CELEX: 62010TB0048
Language: en
Date: 2010-12-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-48/10 P: Order of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Meister v OHIM (Appeals — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2008 promotion procedure — Decision awarding points in the promotion procedure — Mention of points accumulated in previous promotion procedures — Distortion of the facts — Burden of costs — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)

19.2.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 55/23
            
         Order of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Meister v OHIM
   (Case T-48/10 P) (1)
   
   (Appeals - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2008 promotion procedure - Decision awarding points in the promotion procedure - Mention of points accumulated in previous promotion procedures - Distortion of the facts - Burden of costs - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded)
   2011/C 55/42
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Herbert Meister (Muchamiel, Spain) (represented by: H.-J. Zimmermann, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck and E. Winter, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 November 2009 in Case F-17/09 Meister v OHIM ECR-SC I-A-1-0000 and I-A-2-0000, seeking for that order to be set aside.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Herbert Meister is ordered to bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) in the appeal proceedings.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 100, 17.4.2010.