CELEX: 62005FO0095
Language: en
Date: 2007-05-24 00:00:00
Title: Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal of 24 May 2007. # N v Commission of the European Communities. # Case F-95/05 AJ.

ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE SECOND CHAMBER OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL
      24 May 2007
      Case F-95/05 AJ
      N
      v
      Commission of the European Communities 
      (Legal aid)
      Application: in which N seeks legal aid under Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, applicable mutatis mutandis
         to the Civil Service Tribunal pursuant to Article 3(4) of Council Decision 2004/752/EC, Euratom of 2 November 2004 establishing
         the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (OJ 2004 L 333, p. 7), until the entry into force of its rules of procedure.
      
      Held: N is granted legal aid. A sum corresponding to the costs incurred by N from the date when the application for legal aid was
         submitted is to be paid to the lawyer assisting the applicant, on the basis of supporting documents and up to a maximum of
         EUR 2000. Ms I. Kletzlen is appointed as the lawyer representing N.
      
      Summary
      Procedure – Application for legal aid – Costs covered 
      (Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance, Arts 94 and 95; Council Decision 2004/752, Art. 3(4))
      It is apparent from Articles 94 and 95 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance that legal aid must, in principle,
         be reserved for the payment of official costs incurred either when an application for aid is submitted or thereafter. Unless
         there are special circumstances, it would neither be consistent with the letter and spirit of those articles nor would it
         be in the interest of the sound administration of justice for costs incurred before that date to be paid retroactively through
         legal aid. Where costs have been incurred before the application for aid was submitted, the presumption is, until proved to
         the contrary, that the applicant was able to pay them and that one of the conditions for granting legal aid is therefore not
         met.
      
      (see para. 16)
      See:
      order of 3 April 2006 in Case T-49/04 AJ Hassan v Council and Commission, not published in the ECR; order of 27 October 2006 in Case T-318/01 AJ Othman v Council and Commission, not published in the ECR