CELEX: 62016CA0044
Language: en
Date: 2017-05-11 00:00:00
Title: Case C-44/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 May 2017 — Dyson Ltd v Commission (Appeal — Directive 2010/30/EU — Indication of energy consumption by labelling and standard product information — Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 — Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners — Energy efficiency — Measurement method — Limits of delegated powers — Distortion of the evidence — Duty of the General Court to state reasons)

24.7.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 239/10
            
         Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 May 2017 — Dyson Ltd v Commission
   (Case C-44/16 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Directive 2010/30/EU - Indication of energy consumption by labelling and standard product information - Delegated Regulation (EU) No 665/2013 - Energy labelling of vacuum cleaners - Energy efficiency - Measurement method - Limits of delegated powers - Distortion of the evidence - Duty of the General Court to state reasons))
   (2017/C 239/13)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Dyson Ltd (represented by: E. Batchelor and M. Healy, Solicitors, F. Carlin, Barrister, and A. Patsa, Advocate)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and E. White, acting as Agents)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 11 November 2015, Dyson v Commission (T-544/13, EU:T:2015:836), in so far as it rejected the first part of the first plea in law and the third plea in law put forward at first instance;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for it to give judgment on the first part of the first plea in law and the third plea in law put forward at first instance;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Reserves the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.