CELEX: 62014TA0507
Language: en
Date: 2016-02-26 00:00:00
Title: Case T-507/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Vidmar and Others v Commission (Non-contractual liability — Accession of Croatia to the European Union — Repeal before accession of national legislation establishing the profession of bailiff — Loss suffered by persons formerly appointed as bailiffs — Failure by the Commission to adopt measures to ensure fulfilment of accession commitments — Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals — Article 36 of the Act of Accession)

4.4.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 118/27
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 26 February 2016 — Vidmar and Others v Commission
   (Case T-507/14) (1)
   
   ((Non-contractual liability - Accession of Croatia to the European Union - Repeal before accession of national legislation establishing the profession of bailiff - Loss suffered by persons formerly appointed as bailiffs - Failure by the Commission to adopt measures to ensure fulfilment of accession commitments - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Article 36 of the Act of Accession))
   (2016/C 118/29)
   Language of the case: Croatian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Vedran Vidmar (Zagreb, Croatia) and the 21 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to this judgment (represented by: D. Graf, lawyer), and Darko Graf (Zagreb) (represented initially by D Graf and subsequently by L. Duvnjak, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Ječmenica and G. Wils, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action for damages seeking compensation for the harm which the applicants claim to have suffered as a result of the wrongful conduct of the Commission while monitoring the fulfilment of accession commitments by the Republic of Croatia.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Vedran Vidmar and Darko Graf and the other applicants whose names appear in the annex to this judgment to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 303, 8.9.2014.