CELEX: C2001/150/53
Language: en
Date: 2001-05-19 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 14 February 2001 in Case T-3/00: Athanasios N. Pitsiorlas v Council of the European Union and European Central Bank (Inadmissibility — Access to institution documents)

19.5.2001              EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                            C 150/27
—     in Case T-74/94: J.J.H. van den Broek, G.J.E. van Laar,                    ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
      J.T. Salden, J.A.M. Wouters
                                                                                                 of 14 February 2001
—     in Case T-75/94: J.M.F.M. Flamand                                   in Case T-3/00: Athanasios N. Pitsiorlas v Council of the
                                                                                 European Union and European Central Bank (1)
—     in Case T-86/94: J. Bakker, E. Hardeman, G.J. Prins, G. van              (Inadmissibility — Access to institution documents)
      Putten
                                                                                                    (2001/C 150/53)
—     in Case T-87/94:Th. H. Clemens, N.J.G.M. Costongs,
      W.A.J. Derks, R.P. Geertsema, W. Hermsen, P. Hogenk-                                     (Language of the case: Greek)
      amp, J.H. Kelder, G.M. Kuijs, E.J. Liefting, J.H. Nieuwenhu-
      izen, D.J. Preuter, A.J.M. Sturkenboom, J.J. de Wit                 In Case T-3/00: Athanasios Pitsiorlas, residing in Thessaloniki
                                                                          (Greece), Dimitris Papafilippou, Barrister, against Council of
                                                                          the European Union (Agents: M. Bauer, S. Kyriakopoulou and
—     in Case T-91/94: D. Vellema, J. and K. Visser                       D. Zachariou) and European Central Bank (Agents: C. Zilioli,
                                                                          P. Vospernik and C. Kroppenstedt) — application for annul-
                                                                          ment of the decision of the Council of 30 July 1999 and of the
—     in Case T-94/94: J.W. Esselink                                      decision of the European Central Bank of 8 November 1999,
                                                                          refusing the applicant access to a document — the Court of
                                                                          First Instance (First Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf,
—     in Case T-96/94: J.P. Groot                                         President, M. Vilaras and N.J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung,
                                                                          Registrar, made an order on 14 February 2001, the operative
                                                                          part of which is as follows:
—     in Case T-101/94: A.J. Dubbelhuis, A. Harkema, W. Knol
                                                                          1.    The action is dismissed as inadmissible to the extent that it is
                                                                                directed against the Council decision of 30 July 1999;
—     in Case T-104/94: H. Rozema, B.L. van der Wijk
                                                                          2.    The applicant shall bear his own expenses corresponding to the
                                                                                objection of inadmissibility as well as pay for the costs incurred
—     in Case T-105/94: W. Talsma                                               by the Council.
                                                                          (1) OJ C 122 29.4.00
—     in Case T-106/94: R. and F. Visser, L.H. Hiddema
—     in Case T-118/94: J. Hoedjes, J.K. Veenstra
—     in Case T-119/94: A.J.M. and F.J.M. Baack, A.B. ten                        ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
      Broeke, O. Dallinga, L.A. Looman, J.H. Hoogendoorn
                                                                                                  of 2 February 2001
—     in Case T-122/94: A.G.J. van Boxtel
                                                                          in Case T-97/00: Anastassia Vakalopoulou v Commission
                                                                                          of the European Communities (1)
—     in Case T-124/94: K.A. Schutter
                                                                          (Temporary agent — Fixed-term contract — Extension —
                                                                          Action for annulment and damages — Decision adversely
—     in Case T-130/94: R. van Dijk, H.J. Hiermstra,                             affecting an official — Manifestly inadmissible)
      A.W.J. Reijers.
                                                                                                    (2001/C 150/54)
                                                                                              (Language of the case: French)
(1) OJ C 334 of 9.12.93, C 27 of 28.1.94, C 43 of 12.2.94, C 59 of
    26.2.94, C 90 of 26.3.94, C 103 of 11.4.94, C 120 of 30.4.94,         In Case T-97/00: Anastassia Vakalopoulou, member of the
    C 132 of 14.5.94, C 233 of 20.8.94 and C 370 of 24.12.94              temporary staff of the Commission of the European Communi-
                                                                          ties, residing at Brussels, represented by Jean-Noël Louis and
                                                                          Véronique Peere, of the Brussels Bar, with an address for
                                                                          service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European
                                                                          Communities (Agents: G. Valsesia and J. Currall) — application
                                                                          for annulment of the alleged decision of the Commission not