CELEX: 62008TA0086
Language: en
Date: 2012-07-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-86/08: Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2012 — Greece v Commission (EAGGF — Guarantee Section — Expenditure excluded from financing — Fruit and vegetables — Rural development — Non-compliance with payment deadlines — Compliance with a judgment of the Court — Authority of res judicata — Time-limit of 24 months — Principle of proportionality)

11.8.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 243/13
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2012 — Greece v Commission
   (Case T-86/08) (1)
   
   (EAGGF - Guarantee Section - Expenditure excluded from financing - Fruit and vegetables - Rural development - Non-compliance with payment deadlines - Compliance with a judgment of the Court - Authority of res judicata - Time-limit of 24 months - Principle of proportionality)
   2012/C 243/23
   Language of the case: Greek
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Hellenic Republic (represented: initially by V. Kontolaimos, S. Charitaki and M. Tassopoulou and subsequently by M. Tassopoulou and I. Chalkias and K. Tsagkaropoulos, acting as Agents)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: H. Tserepa-Lacombe, acting as Agent, and P. Katsimani, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of Commission Decision 2008/68/EC of 20 December 2007 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF) (OJ 2008 L 18, p. 12) in so far as it relates to certain expenditure incurred by the Hellenic Republic.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 142, 7.6.2008.