CELEX: 62016TN0025
Language: en
Date: 2016-01-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-25/16: Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Haw Par v OHIM — Cosmowell (GelenkGold)

21.3.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 106/39
            
         Action brought on 25 January 2016 — Haw Par v OHIM — Cosmowell (GelenkGold)
   (Case T-25/16)
   (2016/C 106/45)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Haw Par Corp. Ltd (Singapore, Singapore) (represented by: R. Härer, C. Schultze, J. Ossing, C. Weber, H. Ranzinger, C. Gehweiler, C. Brockmann, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cosmowell GmbH (Sankt Johann in Tirol, Austria)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘GelenkGold’ — Community trade mark No 9 957 978
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 November 2015 in Case R 1907/2015-1
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs that the applicant incurred before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of the second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.