CELEX: 62007TN0488
Language: en
Date: 2007-12-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-488/07: Action brought on 20 December 2007 — Cabel Hall Citrus v OHIM — Casur (EGLÉFRUIT)

8.3.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 64/44
            
         Action brought on 20 December 2007 — Cabel Hall Citrus v OHIM — Casur (EGLÉFRUIT)
   (Case T-488/07)
   (2008/C 64/73)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Cabel Hall Citrus Ltd (Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands) (represented by: C. Rogers, Barrister)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Casur S. Coop. Andaluza (Viator, Spain)
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of 19 September 2007 of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM in Case R 293/2007-1;
            
         
               —
            
            
               direct the relevant Cancellation Division of OHIM to declare invalid Community trade mark registration No 3 517 431 EGLÉFRUIT;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   
      Registered Community trade mark subject of the application for a declaration of invalidity: The word mark ‘EGLÉFRUIT’ for goods and services in classes 29, 30 and 31 — Community trade mark No 3 517 431
   
      Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Casur S. Coop. Andaluza
   
      Party requesting the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Trade mark right of the party requesting the declaration of invalidity: The Community and national word and figurative marks ‘UGLI’ for goods in classes 29, 31 and 32
   
      Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection of the request for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) of Council Regulation No 40/94 because the Board of Appeal misapplied the test of likelihood of confusion between the conflicting trade marks.