CELEX: 62019TB0272
Language: en
Date: 2020-07-31 00:00:00
Title: Case T-272/19: Order of the General Court of 31 July 2020 –TO v EEAS (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Refusal to employ on the ground that the candidate is unfit to perform duties — Time limit for bringing proceedings — Public policy — Delay — Calculation of the time limit — Determination of the date from which the person concerned could have become aware of the content of the decision — Manifest inadmissibility)

3.11.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 371/12
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 31 July 2020 –TO v EEAS
      (Case T-272/19) (1)
      
      (Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Refusal to employ on the ground that the candidate is unfit to perform duties - Time limit for bringing proceedings - Public policy - Delay - Calculation of the time limit - Determination of the date from which the person concerned could have become aware of the content of the decision - Manifest inadmissibility)
      (2020/C 371/12)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: TO (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, on the one hand, annulment, first, of the EEAS decision of 15 June 2018 informing the applicant that she did not fulfil all of the conditions of employment laid down in Article 82 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union and that she could not be recruited as a member of the contract staff of the EEAS and, second, of the decision of the EEAS of 14 January 2019 rejecting her complaint of 14 September 2018, and, on the other hand, compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The action is dismissed as being manifestly inadmissible.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  TO shall pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.