CELEX: C2000/355/50
Language: en
Date: 2000-12-09 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 October 2000 in Case T-130/99: David Crabbe v European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) (Officials — Establishment of linguist posts — No need to adjudicate)

C 355/22                EN                     Official Journal of the European Communities                                         9.12.2000
of the Brussels Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg            aid illegal and incompatible with the common market and
at the Chambers of J. Loesch, 11 rue Goethe, against Com-                 order its recovery — the Court of First Instance (Third
mission of the European Communities (Agents: V. Kreuschitz                Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of: K. Lenaerts,
and N. Khan) — application for compensation to make good                  President, J. Azizi, R.M. Moura Ramos, M. Jaeger and P. Men-
the damage allegedly suffered as a consequence of the adoption            gozzi, Judges; J. Palacio González, Administrator, for the
of Commission Regulation (EC) No 2529/97 of 16 December                   Registrar, has given a judgment on 29 September 2000, in
1997 imposing provisional anti-dumping and countervailing                 which it:
duties on certain imports of farmed Atlantic salmon originat-
ing in Norway (OJ 1997 L 346, p. 63) — the Court of First                 1.    Dismisses the application;
Instance (Third Chamber, Extended Composition), composed
of K. Lenaerts, President, J. Azizi, R.M. Moura Ramos, M. Jaeger          2.    Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
and P. Mengozzi, Judges; J. Palacio González, Administrator,
for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 24 October 2000, in
which it:                                                                 (1) OJ C 174 of 19.6.99.
1.    Orders the Commission to pay to the applicant NOK 431 000;
2.    Dismisses the remainder of the application;
3.    Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and to pay three
      quarters of the applicant’s costs;
4.    Orders the applicant to bear one quarter of its own costs.              JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
(1) OJ No C 160 of 5.6.99.
                                                                                                  of 3 October 2000
                                                                          in Case T-130/99: David Crabbe v European Centre for
                                                                           the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) (1)
                                                                          (Officials — Establishment of linguist posts — No need to
                                                                                                       adjudicate)
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                                   (2000/C 355/50)
                      of 29 September 2000
                                                                                              (Language of the case: French)
in Case T-55/99: Confederación Española de Transporte
de Mercancı́as (CETM) v Commission of the European
                          Communities (1)                                 In Case T-130/99: David Crabbe, an official at the European
                                                                          Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDE-
(State aid — Aid within the meaning of Article 92(1) of the               FOP), residing in Thessaloniki, Greece, represented by
EC Treaty (now, after amendment, Article 87(1) EC) —                      M.-A. Lucas, of the Liège Bar, with an address for service in
Statement of reasons — Obligation to recover aid —                        Luxembourg at the offices of Société de gestion fiduciaire
Legitimate expectations of recipients — Principle of pro-                 SARL, 13, avenue du Bois, against European Centre for
                            portionality)                                 the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) (Agent:
                                                                          B. Wägenbaur) — application for the annulment of CEDEFOP’s
                                                                          implied decision not to create linguist posts in its organisation
                          (2000/C 355/49)                                 — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of
                                                                          R. Garcı́a-Valdecasas, President, P. Lindh and J.D. Cooke,
                                                                          Judges; J. Palacio González, Administrator, for the Registrar,
                    (Language of the case: Spanish)                       gave a judgment on 3 October 2000, the operative part of
                                                                          which is as follows:
In Case T-55/99: Confederación Española de Transporte de
Mercancı́as (CETM) having its registered office in Madrid,                1.    There is no need to adjudicate on the present application.
represented by J. Pérez Villar, of the Madrid Bar, 322 Calle
López de Hoyos, Madrid, against Commission of the European               2.    CEDEFOP is ordered to pay the costs.
Communities (Agents: J. Guerra Fernández and D. Triantafyllou
) — application for annulment of Commission Decision
98/693/EC of 1 July 1998 concerning the Spanish Plan Renove               (1) OJ No C 226 of 7.8.99.
Industrial system of aid for the purchase of commercial
vehicles (August 1994 — December 1996) (OJ 1998 L 329,
p. 23) in that Articles 3 and 4 of that decision declare certain