CELEX: 62019TN0140
Language: en
Date: 2019-03-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-140/19: Action brought on 4 March 2019 — ZU v Commission

6.5.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 155/47
            
         
      Action brought on 4 March 2019 — ZU v Commission
      (Case T-140/19)
      (2019/C 155/56)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: ZU (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Commission
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul, first, the applicant’s appraisal report of 25 April 2018;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul second, the decision of non-promotion of 18 June 2018;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul, third, the decision of 28 May 2018, rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul, fourth, in so far as necessary, decision No R/400/18 of 21 November 2018, rejecting the applicant’s complaint against his appraisal report and the decision of non-promotion;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul, fifth, in so far as necessary, decision No R/461/18 of 21 November 2018, rejecting the applicant’s complaint against the decision rejecting his request for assistance.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, in support of the applicant’s claim for annulment of the decision rejecting his request for assistance, alleging manifest error of assessment, violation of the duty of care, infringement of the principle of good administration, and misuse of power.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, in support of the applicant’s claim for annulment of his appraisal report and the decision of non-promotion, alleging manifest error of assessment, omission of relevant facts and misuse of powers.