CELEX: 62014TN0028
Language: en
Date: 2014-01-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-28/14: Action brought on 14 January 2014 — José Manuel Baena Grupo v OHIM — Neuman and Galdeano del Sel (Representation of a seated figure)

15.3.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 78/14
            
         Action brought on 14 January 2014 — José Manuel Baena Grupo v OHIM — Neuman and Galdeano del Sel (Representation of a seated figure)
   (Case T-28/14)
   2014/C 78/28
   Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: José Manuel Baena Grupo, SA (Santa Perpètua de Mogoda, Spain) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Herbert Neuman and Andoni Galdeano del Sel (Tarifa, Spain)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul OHIM’s decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Registered Community design No 426 895-002 for ‘T-shirts (Ornamentation for); Caps (Ornamentation for); Stickers (Ornamentation for); Printed matter, including advertising materials (Ornamentation for)’.
   
      Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Applicant
   
      Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Herbert Neuman and Andoni Galdeano del Sel
   
      Mark or design of the applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Community figurative mark No 1 312 651, for goods in Classes 25, 28, and 32 of the Nice Classification.
   
      Decision of the Cancellation Division: Application upheld and design declared invalid
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Appeal dismissed in part
   
      Pleas in law: Incorrect interpretation of Regulation No 6/2002