CELEX: 62012CN0234
Language: en
Date: 2012-05-14 00:00:00
Title: Case C-234/12: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Sky Italia s.r.l. v AGCOM

21.7.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 217/11
            
         Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 14 May 2012 — Sky Italia s.r.l. v AGCOM
   (Case C-234/12)
   2012/C 217/23
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Referring court
   
   Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Sky Italia s.r.l.
   
      Defendant: Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni (AGCOM)
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Must Article 4 of Directive 2010/13/EU, (1) the general principle of equality and the rules of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union relating to the free movement of services, the right of establishment and the free movement of capital be interpreted as precluding the rules in Article 38(5) of Legislative Decree No 177/2005 which lay down shorter hourly advertising limits for pay-TV broadcasters than for free-to-air broadcasters?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Does Article 11 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, interpreted in the light of Article 10 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights, and does the principle of pluralism in the media, in particular, preclude the rules in Article 38(5) of Legislative Decree No 177/2005 which lay down shorter hourly advertising limits for pay-TV broadcasters than for free-to-air broadcasters, distorting competition and creating — or rather strengthening — dominant positions in the television advertising market?
            
         
      (1)  OJ 2010, L 95, p. 1.