CELEX: 62019TA0371
Language: en
Date: 2020-07-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-371/19: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2020 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (FAKE DUCK) (European Union trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark FAKE DUCK — Earlier EU figurative mark FAKE DUCK — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Relevant public — Similarity of the goods and services — Similarity of the signs — Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

3.11.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 371/9
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2020 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO — Save the Duck (FAKE DUCK)
      (Case T-371/19) (1)
      
      (European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark FAKE DUCK - Earlier EU figurative mark FAKE DUCK - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Relevant public - Similarity of the goods and services - Similarity of the signs - Global assessment of the likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
      (2020/C 371/07)
      Language of the case: Italian
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Itinerant Show Room Srl (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: A. Visentin, M. Cartella and B. Cartella, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Capostagno, acting as Agent)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Save the Duck SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: M. De Vietro, lawyer)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 April 2019 (Case R 1117/2018-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Forest Srl and Itinerant Show Room.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the appeal;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders Itinerant Show Room to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 263, 5.8.2019.