CELEX: 62014TB0617
Language: en
Date: 2015-07-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-617/14: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2015 — Pro Asyl v EASO (Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Operational Plan for the deployment of an asylum support team in the territory of Bulgaria — Refusal of access — No need to adjudicate — Action for annulment — Electronic document register — Partial manifest inadmissibility)

28.9.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 320/27
            
         Order of the General Court of 14 July 2015 — Pro Asyl v EASO
   (Case T-617/14) (1)
   
   ((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Operational Plan for the deployment of an asylum support team in the territory of Bulgaria - Refusal of access - No need to adjudicate - Action for annulment - Electronic document register - Partial manifest inadmissibility))
   (2015/C 320/43)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Pro Asyl Bundesweite Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Flüchtlinge eV (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: S. Hilbrans, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (EASO) (represented by: L. Cerdán Ortiz-Quintana, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of letter EASO/ED/2014/134 of the EASO of 10 June 2014.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it seeks the annulment of letter EASO/ED/2014/134 of the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) of 10 June 2014 refusing access to the operational plan to deploy the European Union support team in Bulgaria.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The remainder of the action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Each party shall bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 409, 17.11.2014.