CELEX: 52012PC0409
Language: en
Date: 2012-07-24
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising the Republic of Lithuania to extend the application of a measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax

|
			
		
		
		52012PC0409
		
			Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION authorising the Republic of Lithuania to extend the application of a measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax /* COM/2012/0409 final - 2012/0200 (NLE) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
Grounds for and objectives of the
proposal
Pursuant to Article 395 of Council
Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added
tax ([1])
(hereafter 'the VAT Directive'), the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal
from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to apply special measures
for derogation from that Directive in order to simplify the procedure for
collecting the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance.
By letter registered with the Commission on
8 February 2012, the Republic of Lithuania (hereafter 'Lithuania') requested
authorisation to continue to apply a measure derogating from Article 193 of the
VAT Directive. 
In accordance with Article 395(2) of the
VAT Directive, the Commission informed the other Member States by letter dated 4
April 2012 of the request made by Lithuania. By letter dated 11 April 2012, the
Commission notified Lithuania that it had all the information it considered
necessary for appraisal of the request.
General context
The Lithuanian government asks to extend
the current application of a reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies
of timber and supplies by taxable persons under judicial insolvency or
restructuring procedures.
As regards the supplies of timber,
Lithuania was confronted with a considerable number of traders that failed to
comply with their obligations. Businesses in this sector are frequently small
resellers and intermediaries, which often disappear without paying to the tax
authorities the tax they charged on their supplies but leaving their customers
in receipt of a valid invoice for VAT deduction.
Taxable persons under judicial insolvency
or restructuring procedures often did not pay the VAT they had received from
their customers to the tax authorities. However, the purchaser could, as a
compliant trader, still deduct the VAT incurred.
Under the reverse charge mechanism, by
derogating from a general rule provided in Article 193 of the VAT Directive, the
customer (in case he is a taxable person) becomes liable for the payment of the
VAT on domestic transactions. 
This derogating measure had initially been
granted by Council Decision 2006/388/EC of 15 May 2006 ([2]) (it also included supplies of ferrous
waste and scrap and construction work, which are now covered by Article 199 of
the VAT Directive). The application of the derogating measure for supplies of
timber and supplies by taxable persons under judicial insolvency or
restructuring procedures was extended by Council Implementing Decision
2010/99/EU of 16 February 2010([3]).
The Commission understands that the
situation, on which the initial derogation was based, continues to exist.
Lithuania claims that, based on the results of tax investigations, the derogation
proved to be effective both for supplies of timber and supplies by taxable
persons under judicial insolvency or restructuring procedures. The derogation
should therefore be granted for another limited period.
In case Lithuania would consider another
extension of the derogating measure beyond 2015, an evaluation report should be
submitted to the Commission together with that extension request no later than
1 April 2015.
Existing provisions in the area of the
proposal
Similar derogations in relation to Article
193 of the VAT Directive have been granted to other Member States.
Consistency with the other policies and
objectives of the Union
Not applicable.
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS
WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
Consultation of interested parties
Not relevant.
Collection and use of expertise
There was no need for external expertise.
Impact assessment
The proposal for a Council Decision aims at
simplifying the procedure for charging the tax and at combating possible VAT
evasion or avoidance and has therefore a potential positive economic impact.
The impact will in any case be limited
because of the narrow scope of the derogation.
3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE
PROPOSAL
Summary of the proposed action
The Decision authorises Lithuania to continue
to apply a measure derogating from Article 193 of the VAT Directive as regards
the use of a reverse charge mechanism in case of supplies of timber and in case
of supplies of goods and services by businesses under an insolvency or
restructuring procedure subject to judicial oversight.
Legal basis
Article 395 of the VAT Directive.
Subsidiarity principle
In accordance with Article 395 of the VAT
Directive, a Member State wishing to introduce measures derogating from the
said Directive must obtain an authorisation from the Council, which will take
the form of a Council Decision. Therefore, the proposal complies with the
subsidiarity principle.
Proportionality principle
The proposal complies with the
proportionality principle for the following reasons.
This Decision concerns an authorisation
granted to a Member State upon its own request and does not constitute any
obligation.
Given the limited scope of the derogation,
the special measure is proportionate to the aim pursued.
Choice of instruments
Under Article 395 of the VAT Directive,
derogation from the common VAT rules is only possible with the authorisation of
the Council acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission. Moreover, a
Council Decision is the most suitable instrument since it can be addressed to
individual Member States.
4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION 
The proposal has no implication for the EU
budget.
5.           OPTIONAL ELEMENTS 
Review/revision/sunset clause
The proposal includes a sunset clause.
2012/0200 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
authorising the Republic of Lithuania to
extend the application of a measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive
2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 291(2) thereof,
Having regard to Council Directive
2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax ([4]), and in particular Article
395(1) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
Whereas:
(1)       By letter registered with the
Commission on 8 February 2012, the Republic of Lithuania (hereafter
'Lithuania') requested authorisation to continue to apply a measure derogating
from the provisions of Directive 2006/112/EC governing the person liable for
the payment of the value added tax (VAT) to tax authorities.
(2)       In accordance with Article
395(2) of Directive 2006/112/EC, the Commission informed the other Member
States of the request made by Lithuania in a letter dated 4 April 2012. By a
letter dated 11 April 2012, the Commission notified Lithuania that it had all
the information that it considered necessary to consider the request.
(3)       Council Decision
2006/388/EC of 15 May 2006 authorising the Republic of Lithuania to apply a
measure derogating from Article 21 of the Sixth Directive 77/388/EEC on the
harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes ([5]) authorized Lithuania inter
alia to make the recipient liable for the VAT due on the supply of goods and
services in the case of insolvency procedures or restructuring procedures
subject to judicial oversight and supply of timber. 
(4)       Council Implementing
Decision 2010/99/EU of 16 February 2010 authorising the Republic of Lithuania
to extend the application of a measure derogating from Article 193 of Directive
2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax ([6]) extended the application of
the mentioned derogating measure.
(5)       The tax investigations and
the analysis carried out by the Lithuanian tax authorities revealed the
effectiveness of the derogating measure in question.
(6)       The Commission understands
that the legal and factual situation which justified the current application of
the derogating measure in question has not changed and continues to exist.
Lithuania should therefore be authorised to apply the measure during a further
limited period.
(7)       In case Lithuania would
consider another extension of the derogating measure beyond 2015, an evaluation
report should be submitted to the Commission together with that extension
request no later than 1 April 2015.
(8)       The derogation will not
adversely affect the European Union's own resources accruing from VAT, 
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: 
Article 1
Article 2 of Decision 2010/99/EU is
replaced by the following:
'Article 2
This Decision shall take effect on the day
of its notification.
It shall apply from 1 January 2013 until 31
December 2015. Any request for the extension of the measure provided for in
this Decision shall be submitted to the Commission no later than 1 April 2015
and shall be accompanied by a report which includes a review of the application
of this measure.' 
Article 2
This Decision is addressed to the Republic
of Lithuania.
Done at Brussels, 
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
[1]               OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.
[2]               OJ L 150, 3.6.2006, p. 13–14 
[3]               OJ L 45, 20.2.2010, p. 10–11 
[4]               OJ L 347, 11.12.2006, p. 1.
[5]               OJ L 150, 3.6.2006, p. 13–14 
[6]               OJ L 45, 20.2.2010, p. 10–11