CELEX: C2005/132/44
Language: en
Date: 2005-05-28 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 16 March 2005 in Case T-283/02 EnBW Kernkraft GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (TACIS Programme — Services provided in connection with a nuclear power station in Ukraine — Not paid for — Jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance — Action for compensation — Non-contractual liability)

28.5.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 132/24
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 16 March 2005
   in Case T-283/02 EnBW Kernkraft GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (1)
   
   (TACIS Programme - Services provided in connection with a nuclear power station in Ukraine - Not paid for - Jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance - Action for compensation - Non-contractual liability)
   (2005/C 132/44)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case T-283/02: EnBW Kernkraft GmbH, fomerly Gemeinschaftskernkraftwerk Neckar GmbH, established in Neckarwestheim (Germany), represented by S. Zickgraf, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: S. Fries and F. Hoffmeister, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for compensation under Article 288 EC in respect of damage allegedly suffered by the applicant following failure by the Commission to pay for the services provided by it under the TACIS programme in relation to the Zaporozhe nuclear power station (Ukraine) — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and V. Vadapalas, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 16 March 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the application;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.