CELEX: 62013TA0118
Language: en
Date: 2016-06-22 00:00:00
Title: Case T-118/13: Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2016 — Whirlpool Europe v Commission (Actions for annulment — State aid — Household appliances — Restructuring aid — Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market, subject to compliance with certain conditions — Decision taken following the annulment by the Court of the earlier decision concerning the same procedure — Lack of individual concern — No substantial effect on the competitive position — Inadmissibility)

1.8.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 279/26
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2016 — Whirlpool Europe v Commission
   (Case T-118/13) (1)
   
   ((Actions for annulment - State aid - Household appliances - Restructuring aid - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market, subject to compliance with certain conditions - Decision taken following the annulment by the Court of the earlier decision concerning the same procedure - Lack of individual concern - No substantial effect on the competitive position - Inadmissibility))
   (2016/C 279/38)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Whirlpool Europe BV (Breda, Netherlands) (represented by: F. Wijckmans and H. Burez, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, É. Gippini Fournier and P.-J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the applicant: Electrolux AB (Stockholm, Sweden), represented by F. Wijckmans and H. Burez, lawyers)
   
      Interveners in support of the defendant: French Republic (represented by: G. de Bergues, D. Colas and J. Bousin, acting as Agents) and Fagor France SA (Rueil-Malmaison, France) (represented by: J. Derenne and A. Müller-Rappard, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Application based on Article 263 TFEU for the annulment of Commission Decision 2013/283/EU of 25 July 2012 on State aid SA.23839 (C 44/2007) that France plans to grant to FagarBrandt (OJ 2013 L 166, p. 1).
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action as inadmissible;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Whirlpool Europe BV to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the French Republic, Electrolux AB and Fagor France SA to bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.