CELEX: 62019TN0295
Language: en
Date: 2019-05-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-295/19: Action brought on 3 May 2019 — Klymenko v Council

24.6.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 213/80
            
         
      Action brought on 3 May 2019 — Klymenko v Council
      (Case T-295/19)
      (2019/C 213/77)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: M. Phelippeau, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: Council of the European Union
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  declare the action brought by Mr Oleksandr Viktorovych Klymenko admissible;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/354 of 4 March 2019 amending Decision 2014/119/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/352 of 4 March 2019 implementing Regulation (EU) No 208/2014 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Ukraine;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings in accordance with Articles 87 and 91 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons, in that insufficient reasons are given for the contested measures.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence and the right to effective judicial protection as enshrined in the fundamental principles of EU law and set out in Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, and of Articles 6 and 13 of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Third plea in law, alleging a lack of legal basis, since Article 29 of the Treaty on European Union cannot provide a legal basis for the restrictive measures adopted against the applicant.
               
            
                  4.
               
               
                  Fourth plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment, in that the applicant has provided evidence proving the lack of a sufficient factual basis for bringing criminal proceedings.
               
            
                  5.
               
               
                  Fifth plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to respect for property, a fundamental principle of EU law enshrined in Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and in Article 1 of Additional Protocol No 1 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms.