CELEX: C2007/235/11
Language: en
Date: 2007-10-06 00:00:00
Title: Case C-131/06 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 April 2007 — Castellblanch SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Champagne Louis Roederer SA (Appeal — Figurative mark CRISTAL CASTELLBLANCH — Refusal of registration)

6.10.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 235/7
            
         Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 24 April 2007 — Castellblanch SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), Champagne Louis Roederer SA
   (Case C-131/06 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Figurative mark CRISTAL CASTELLBLANCH - Refusal of registration)
   (2007/C 235/11)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Castellblanch SA (represented by: F. de Visscher, E. Cornu, E. De Gryse and D. Moreau, avocats)
   
      Other parties to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: I. de Medrano Caballero, Agent), Champagne Louis Roederer SA (represented by: P. Cousin, avocat)
   Re:
   Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 8 December 2005 in Case T-29/04 Castellblanch SA v OHIM in which the Court of First Instance dismissed the action brought by the applicant for the figurative mark ‘CRISTAL CASTELLBLANCH’ for goods in Class 33 for annulment of Decision R 0037/2002-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 17 November 2003 dismissing the appeal brought against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing to register that mark in the context of the opposition brought by the proprietor of national and international word marks containing the word ‘CRISTAL’ for goods in Class 33
   Operative part of the order
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Castellblanch SA shall pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006.