CELEX: 62006TA0149
Language: en
Date: 2007-11-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-149/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 November 2007 — Castellani v OHIM — Markant Handels und Service (CASTELLANI) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark CASTELLANI — Earlier national word marks CASTELLUM and CASTELLUCA — Relative ground of refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

12.1.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 8/14
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 20 November 2007 — Castellani v OHIM — Markant Handels und Service (CASTELLANI)
   (Case T-149/06) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community trade mark CASTELLANI - Earlier national word marks CASTELLUM and CASTELLUCA - Relative ground of refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2008/C 8/27)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Castellani SpA (Campagna Gello, Italy) (represented by: A. Di Maso and M. Di Maso, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. García Murillo, agent)
   
      The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Markant Handels und Service GmbH (Offenburg, Germany)
   Re:
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 February 2006 (Case R 449/2005-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Markant Handels und Service GmbH and Castellani SpA.
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 February 2006 (Case R 449/2005 1);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 178, 29.7.2006.