CELEX: C2007/095/101
Language: en
Date: 2007-04-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-63/07: Action brought on 1 march 2007 — Mülhens v OHIM — Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva (tosca de FEDEOLIVA)

28.4.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 95/50
            
         Action brought on 1 march 2007 — Mülhens v OHIM — Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva (tosca de FEDEOLIVA)
   (Case T-63/07)
   (2007/C 95/101)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Mülhens GmbH & Co. KG (Köln, Germany) (represented by: D. Eickemeier, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva, A. I. E. (Jaen, Spain)
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the defendant dated 18 December 2006 in Case R 761/2006-2;
            
         
               —
            
            
               reject the application of the Community trade mark No 3 467 651.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   
      Applicant for the Community trade mark: Exportaciones Aceiteras Fedeoliva, A. I. E.
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The figurative Community trademark ‘tosca de FEDEOLIVA ’for goods and services in classes 16, 29, 35 and 39 Application No 3 467 651
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
   
      Mark or sign cited: The community and national word marks ‘TOSCA ’for goods and services in class 3 (perfumeries, essential oils, non-medicated toilet preparations and cosmetics, preparations for hair, toothpastes, toilet soaps)
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b), 8(2)(c) and 8(5) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (‘CTMR’) and of the essential procedural requirements enshrined in Articles 43(1), 73 and 74(1)(2) of the CTMR.