CELEX: 62011FB0114
Language: en
Date: 2013-06-18 00:00:00
Title: Case F-114/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 June 2013 — Rodrigues Regalo Corrêa v Parliament (Civil Service — Remuneration — Family allowances — Education allowance — Conditions for grant — Deduction of an allowance of the same type received from another source — Action manifestly unfounded)

31.8.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 252/49
            
         Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 June 2013 — Rodrigues Regalo Corrêa v Parliament
   (Case F-114/11) (1)
   
   (Civil Service - Remuneration - Family allowances - Education allowance - Conditions for grant - Deduction of an allowance of the same type received from another source - Action manifestly unfounded)
   2013/C 252/88
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: João Manuel Rodrigues Regalo Corrêa (Kehlen, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Salerno, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and V. Montebello-Bemogeot, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Civil Service — Action for annulment of the decision of the Parliament to consider certain financial aid from a Member State to students in higher education to be allowances of the same nature as family allowances and to deduct that financial aid from the education allowance granted to the applicant and annulment of the decision to seek repayment of sums unduly paid.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action brought by Mr Rodrigues Regalo Corrêa is dismissed as manifestly unfounded in law.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Rodrigues Regalo Corrêa shall bear his own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 6, 7.1.2012, p. 28.