CELEX: 62013TA0306
Language: en
Date: 2015-06-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-306/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2015 — Silicium España Laboratorios v OHIM — LLR-G5 (LLRG5) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark ‘LLRG5’ — Absolute ground for refusal — Bad faith on the part of the Community trade mark proprietor — Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

10.8.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 262/19
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 16 June 2015 — Silicium España Laboratorios v OHIM — LLR-G5 (LLRG5)
   (Case T-306/13) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark ‘LLRG5’ - Absolute ground for refusal - Bad faith on the part of the Community trade mark proprietor - Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   (2015/C 262/24)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Silicium España Laboratorios, SL (Tarragona, Spain) (represented by: C. Sueiras Villalobos, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: LLR-G5 Ltd (Castlebar, Ireland) (represented by: A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Chamber of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 March 2013 (case R 383/2012-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between LLR-G5 Ltd and Silicium España Laboratorios, SL.
   
      Operative part
   
   The Court:
   
               1)
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2)
            
            
               Orders Silicium España Laboratorios, SL, to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 226, 3.8.2013.