CELEX: 62021TN0046
Language: en
Date: 2021-01-26 00:00:00
Title: Case T-46/21: Action brought on 26 January 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Yajun (PREMILITY)

15.3.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 88/40
            
         
      Action brought on 26 January 2021 — El Corte Inglés v EUIPO — Yajun (PREMILITY)
      (Case T-46/21)
      (2021/C 88/53)
      Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Liu Yajun (Shenzhen, China)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
      
         Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU figurative mark PREMILITY — Application for registration No 17 899 016
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 November 2020 in Case R 881/2020-4
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision, in so far as, by dismissing the opponent’s appeal, the Board thereby confirms the Opposition Division’s decision in opposition proceedings B 3 065 346 granting EU trade mark No 17 899 016 PREMILITY (figurative) for the goods in Classes 11, 21, 22 and 28 for which registration was sought;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 47(2) and (5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of the case-law established in the judgment of 11 March 2003, C-40/01, Ansul, EU:C:2003:145.
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Inconsistency of the decision with and, therefore, infringement of, the case-law established in the judgment of the Court of Justice of 11 June 2020 in Case C-115/19 P, China Construction Bank v EUIPO (C-115/19 P, EU:C:2020:469) and in the judgment of the General Court of 28 May 2020, Cinkciarz.pl v EUIPO — MasterCard International (We IntelliGence the World and Others) (T-84/19 and T-88/19 to T - 98/19, EU:T:2020:231).