CELEX: 62016CA0564
Language: en
Date: 2018-06-28 00:00:00
Title: Case C-564/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2018 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Puma SE (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(5) — Article 76 — Opposition proceedings — Relative grounds for refusal — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 19 — Rule 50(1) — Earlier decisions of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) recognising the reputation of the earlier trade mark — Principle of sound administration — Taking account of those decisions in subsequent opposition proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Procedural obligations of the Boards of Appeal of EUIPO)

201808030252049692018/C 294/075642016CJC29420180820EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL201806286611Case C-564/16 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2018 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Puma SE (Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(5) — Article 76 — Opposition proceedings — Relative grounds for refusal — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 19 — Rule 50(1) — Earlier decisions of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) recognising the reputation of the earlier trade mark — Principle of sound administration — Taking account of those decisions in subsequent opposition proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Procedural obligations of the Boards of Appeal of EUIPO)
 ---documentbreak--- C2942018EN610120180628EN00076161Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 June 2018 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v Puma SE
   (Case C-564/16 P) (
         1
      )
   ‛(Appeal — EU trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 8(5) — Article 76 — Opposition proceedings — Relative grounds for refusal — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Rule 19 — Rule 50(1) — Earlier decisions of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) recognising the reputation of the earlier trade mark — Principle of sound administration — Taking account of those decisions in subsequent opposition proceedings — Obligation to state reasons — Procedural obligations of the Boards of Appeal of EUIPO)’2018/C 294/07Language of the case: English
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Botis and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Puma SE (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, abogado)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
            1.
         
         
            Dismisses the appeal;
         
      
            2.
         
         
            Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay the costs.
         
      (
         1
      )	OJ C 86, 20.3.2017.