CELEX: C2003/044/36
Language: en
Date: 2003-02-22 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 December 2002 in Case T-119/99: Paul Edwin Hoyer v Commission of the European Communities (Temporary agents — Execution of a judgment of the Court of First Instance — Recommencement of internal competition COM/LA/2/89 — Omission from the list of suitable candidates)

22.2.2003               EN                           Official Journal of the European Union                                            C 44/21
                                                          COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
     JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                       of 5 December 2002                                                           of 5 December 2002
in Case T-119/99: Paul Edwin Hoyer v Commission of the                       in Case T-209/99: Paul Edwin Hoyer v Commission of the
                   European Communities ( 1)                                                    European Communities ( 1)
(Temporary agents — Execution of a judgment of the Court                     (Temporary agents — Execution of a judgment of the Court
of First Instance — Recommencement of internal competition                     of First Instance — Action for damages — Admissibility)
COM/LA/2/89 — Omission from the list of suitable candi-
                                dates)
                                                                                                       (2003/C 44/37)
                          (2003/C 44/36)
                                                                                                 (Language of the case: Dutch)
                    (Language of the case: Dutch)
                                                                             In Case T-209/99: Paul Edwin Hoyer, formerly a temporary
In Case T-119/99: Paul Edwin Hoyer, formerly a temporary                     agent of the Commission of the European Communities,
agent of the Commission of the European Communities,                         residing in Hoeilaart, Belgium, represented by G. van der Wal,
residing in Hoeilaart, Belgium, represented by G. van der Wal,               Lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
Lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against                   Commission of the European Communities (Agents: initially
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: initially                    G. Valsesia and C. Van der Hauwaert, subsequently F. Clotuche-
G. Valsesia and C. Van der Hauwaert, subsequently F. Clotuche-               Duvieusart and H.M.H. Speyart) — application for compen-
Duvieusart and H.M.H. Speyart) — application for annulment                   sation of material and psychological damage suffered as a
of the Commission’s competition COM/LA/2/89 or at least                      result of the judgments delivered by the Court of First Instance
annulment of the jury’s decision to omit the applicant from                  on 17 March 1994 in Case T-43/91 Hoyer v Commission
the list of suitable candidates in the competition, notified to              ECR-SC I-A-91 and II-297 and Case T-51/91 Hoyer v Com-
the applicant by letter of the Commission of 15 February 1999                mission ECR-SC I-A-103 and II-341 — the Court of First
— the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of                  Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President,
M. Vilaras, President, and V. Tiili and P. Mengozzi, Judges;                 and V. Tiili and P. Mengozzi, Judges; J. Palacio González,
J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar,             Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on
gave a judgment on 5 December 2002, in which it:                             5 December 2002, in which it:
1.     Dismissed the application;                                            1.     Dismissed the application as inadmissible;
2.     Ordered each of the parties to bear its own costs.                    2.     Ordered each of the parties to bear its own costs.
( 1) OJ C 226 of 7.8.1999.                                                   (1 ) OJ C 352 of 4.12.1999.