CELEX: C1998/258/59
Language: en
Date: 1998-08-15 00:00:00
Title: ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (First Chamber, Extended Composition) of 30 June 1998 in Case T-73/97: British Shoe Corporation Footwear Supplies Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (Dumping - Textile footwear originating in the People's Republic of China and Indonesia - Commission Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty - Action for annulment - Subsequent regulation imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty - No need to adjudicate)

C 258/34              EN                 Official Journal of the European Communities                                     15.8.98
Champagne (France), represented by FrancËois Sarda, of              Ramos, J. Pirrung and P. Mengozzi, Judges; H. Jung,
the Paris Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg            Registrar, made an order on 30 June 1998, the operative
at the Chambers of Messrs Bonn & Schmitt, 7 Val Sainte-             part of which is as follows:
Croix, v Council of the European Union (Agent: John
Carbery), supported by Commission of the European                   1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action in this
Communities (Agent: GeÂrard Berscheid) Ð application for                case.
annulment of Article 1(4) of Council Regulation (EC)
No 2222/96 of 18 November 1996 amending Regulation                  2. There is no need to adjudicate             either on the
(EEC) No 805/68 on the common organization of the                       applications to intervene by the          Foreign Trade
market in beef and veal (OJ L 296 of 21.11.1996, p. 50)                 Association and the ConfeÂdeÂration      EuropeÂenne de
Ð the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed                 l'Industrie de la Chaussure, or on        the applicants'
of: J. Azizi, President, and R. García-Valdecasas and M.                application for confidential treatment.
Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
25 June 1998, the operative part of which is as follows:            3. The Commission is ordered to pay its own costs and
                                                                        one-half of the costs of the applicants, who are
                                                                        ordered to bear the remainder thereof.
1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
                                                                    4. The applicants to intervene are ordered to bear their
2. The applicants shall bear their own costs and shall be               own costs.
    jointly and severally liable to pay the costs of the
    Council. The Commission shall bear its own costs.               (1) OJ C 166 of 31.5.1997.
(1) OJ C 94 of 22.3.1997 and OJ C 166 of 31.5.1997.
                                                                         ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                            of 8 June 1998
     ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                           in Case T-148/97: David T. Keeling v Office for
          (First Chamber, Extended Composition)                     Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
                       of 30 June 1998                                                        Designs) (1)
in Case T-73/97: British Shoe Corporation Footwear                  (Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade
Supplies Ltd v Commission of the European                           Marks and Designs) Ð Decision of the President of the
                       Communities (1)                              Office concerning the organisation of the Boards of
                                                                    Appeal Ð Action for annulment Ð Article 173 of the EC
(Dumping Ð Textile footwear originating in the People's                               Treaty Ð Inadmissibility)
Republic of China and Indonesia Ð Commission
                                                                                            (98/C 258/60)
Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty Ð
Action for annulment Ð Subsequent regulation imposing                              (Language of the case: English)
 a definitive anti-dumping duty Ð No need to adjudicate)
                        (98/C 258/59)                               In Case T-148/97: David T. Keeling, member of a Board
                                                                    of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
               (Language of the case: English)                      Market (Trade Marks and Designs), residing in Alicante
                                                                    (Spain), represented by Arthur Alan Dashwood, Barrister,
                                                                    of the Bar of England and Wales, instructed by Edward
In Case T-73/97: British Shoe Corporation Footwear
                                                                    Lewis, Solicitors, with an address for service in
Supplies Ltd, with its registered office in Leicester (United
                                                                    Luxembourg at the Chambers of ArseÁne Kronshagen, 22
Kingdom), Clarks International Ltd, with its registered
                                                                    Rue Marie-AdeÂlaïde, against Office for Harmonisation in
office in Somerset (United Kingdom), Deichmann-Schuhe
                                                                    the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Agents:
GmbH & Co. Vertriebs KG, with its registered office in
                                                                    Oreste Montalto and JoaÄo Paulo Miranda de Sousa) Ð
Essen (Germany), Groupe AndreÂ SA, with its registered
                                                                    application for annulment of Decision No ADM-97-3 of
office in Paris, Reno Versandhandel GmbH, with its
                                                                    the President of the Office for Harmonisation in the
registered office in Thaleischweiler-Froschen (Germany),
                                                                    Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 February
Leder & Schuh AG, with its registered office in Graz
                                                                    1997 concerning the organisation of the Boards of Appeal
(Austria), represented by Alasdair Bell and Mark Powell,
                                                                    Ð the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed
Solicitors, with an address for service in Luxembourg at
                                                                    of: V. Tiili, President, C. P. BrieÈt and A. Potocki, Judges;
the Chambers of Marc Loesch, 11 Rue Goethe, against
                                                                    H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 8 June 1998, the
the Commission of the European Communities (Agent:
                                                                    operative part of which is as follows:
Nicholas Khan) Ð application for the annulment of
Commission Regulation (EC) No 165/97 of 28 January                  1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
1997 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on
imports of certain footwear with textile uppers originating         2. The applicant shall bear the costs.
in the People's Republic of China and Indonesia (OJ L 29
of 31.1.1997, p. 3) Ð the Court of First Instance (First            (1) OJ C 199 of 28.6.1997.
Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of B.
Vesterdorf, President, C. W. Bellamy, R. M. Moura