CELEX: 62008TA0557
Language: en
Date: 2010-07-07 00:00:00
Title: Case T-557/08: Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — mPAY24 GmbH v OHIM — Ultra (M PAY) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark M PAY — Earlier Community and national word marks MPAY24 — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

14.8.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 221/41
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2010 — mPAY24 GmbH v OHIM — Ultra (M PAY)
   (Case T-557/08) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark M PAY - Earlier Community and national word marks MPAY24 - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   2010/C 221/66
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: mPAY24 GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: H-G. Zeiner, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ultra d.o.o. Proizvodnja elektronskih naprav (Zagorje ob Savi, Slovenia)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 September 2008 (Case R 221/2007-1) relating to opposition proceedings between mPAY24 GmbH and Ultra d.o.o. Proizvodnja elektronskih naprav.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 September 2008 (Case R 221/2007-1) in so far as that decision dismissed the opposition brought by mPAY24 GmbH;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.