CELEX: 62020TA0113
Language: en
Date: 2022-03-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-113/20: Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2022 — BSEF v Commission (Energy — Directive 2009/125/EC — Ecodesign requirements for electronic displays — Regulation (EU) 2019/2021 — Ban on halogenated flame retardants in the enclosure and stand of electronic displays — Competence of the author of the act — Manifest error of assessment — Legal certainty — Proportionality — Equal treatment)

16.5.2022   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 198/32
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 16 March 2022 — BSEF v Commission
      (Case T-113/20) (1)
      
      (Energy - Directive 2009/125/EC - Ecodesign requirements for electronic displays - Regulation (EU) 2019/2021 - Ban on halogenated flame retardants in the enclosure and stand of electronic displays - Competence of the author of the act - Manifest error of assessment - Legal certainty - Proportionality - Equal treatment)
      (2022/C 198/44)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Bromine Science Environnemental Forum (BSEF) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: R. Cana, E. Mullier and H. Widemann, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. De Meester and L. Haasbeek, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Regulation (EU) 2019/2021 of 1 October 2019 laying down ecodesign requirements for electronic displays pursuant to Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 1275/2008 and repealing Commission Regulation (EC) No 642/2009 (OJ 2019 L 315, p. 241), in so far as it bans the use of halogenated flame retardants in the enclosure and stand of electronic displays.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders Bromine Science Environnemental Forum (BSEF) to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.