CELEX: C2003/044/16
Language: en
Date: 2003-02-22 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 16 January 2003 in Case C-439/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat im Land Niederösterreich): Libor Cipra Vlastimil Kvasnicka v Bezirkshauptmannschaft Mistelbach (Road transport — Social legislation — Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 — Breaks and rest periods — Crew consisting of more than one driver — Jurisdiction of the Court to interpret the AETR Agreement — Principle of legal certainty)

22.2.2003                EN                           Official Journal of the European Union                                                   C 44/9
1.    Declares that, by allowing discriminatory, advantageous rates           1.    In the case of transport by more than one driver, Article 8(2) of
      for admission to museums, monuments, galleries, archaeological                Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 on the harmonisation
      digs, parks and gardens classified as public monuments, granted               of certain social legislation relating to road transport applies as
      by local or decentralised State authorities only in favour of                 a lex specialis that prevails over paragraph 1 of that article.
      Italian nationals and persons resident within the territory of                Consequently, those provisions are not to be applied cumulat-
      those authorities running the cultural sites in question, who are             ively.
      aged over 60 or 65 years, and by excluding from such
      advantages tourists who are nationals of other Member                   2.    The same interpretation applies to Article 8(1) and (2) of the
      States and non-residents who fulfil the same objective age                    European Agreement concerning the Work of Crews of Vehicles
      requirements, the Italian Republic has failed to fulfil its                   engaged in International Road Transport (AETR).
      obligations under Articles 12 EC and 49 EC;
                                                                              3.    It is for the national court to determine, having regard to the
2.    Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.                                 facts of the main proceedings, whether it is appropriate to apply
                                                                                    the provisions of Regulation No 3820/85 or those of that
                                                                                    agreement.
( 1) OJ C 348 of 8.12.2001.
                                                                              4.    Examination of Article 8(1) and (2) of Regulation No 3820/
                                                                                    85 in the light of the principle of legal certainty has failed to
                                                                                    disclose any matters of such a kind as to affect its validity.
                                                                              (1 ) OJ C 31 of 2.2.2002.
                  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                           (Fifth Chamber)
                         of 16 January 2003
                                                                                                JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
in Case C-439/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from
the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat im Land Niederöster-
reich): Libor Cipra Vlastimil Kvasnicka v Bezirk-                                                        (Fifth Chamber)
                shauptmannschaft Mistelbach (1)
                                                                                                       of 16 January 2003
(Road transport — Social legislation — Regulation (EEC)
No 3820/85 — Breaks and rest periods — Crew consisting                        in Case C-462/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from
of more than one driver — Jurisdiction of the Court                                    the Halmstads tingsrätt): Ulf Hammarsten ( 1)
to interpret the AETR Agreement — Principle of legal
                               certainty)
                                                                              (Common organisation of the markets in the flax and hemp
                                                                              sector — Articles 28 EC and 30 EC — National legislation
                            (2003/C 44/16)                                    prohibiting all cultivation and possession of hemp without
                                                                                                       prior authorisation)
                   (Language of the case: German)
                                                                                                          (2003/C 44/17)
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
                    in the European Court Reports)                                                (Language of the case: Swedish)
                                                                              (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
In Case C-439/01: Reference to the Court under Article 234                                        in the European Court Reports)
EC by the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat im Land Niederös-
terreich (Austria) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings
pending before that court between Libor Cipra Vlastimil
Kvasnicka and Bezirkshauptmannschaft Mistelbach, on the                       In Case C-462/01: Reference to the Court under Article 234
interpretation and validity of Article 8(1) and (2) of Council                EC by the Halmstads tingsrätt (Sweden) for a preliminary ruling
Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85 of 20 December 1985 on the                        in criminal proceedings before it against Ulf Hammarsten on
harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road                  the interpretation of Articles 28 EC and 30 EC and of
transport (OJ 1985 L 370, p. 1), the Court (Fifth Chamber),                   the Community legislation applicable to the cultivation and
composed of: M. Wathelet, President of the Chamber,                           marketing of hemp, the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of:
D.A.O. Edward, A. La Pergola, S. von Bahr and A. Rosas                        M. Wathelet, President of the Chamber, D.A.O. Edward, A. La
(Rapporteur), Judges; S. Alber, Advocate General; R. Grass,                   Pergola (Rapporteur), P. Jann and A. Rosas, Judges; C. Stix-
Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 January 2003, in which                  Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a
it has ruled:                                                                 judgment on 16 January 2003, in which it has ruled: