CELEX: 62021CN0316
Language: en
Date: 2021-05-21 00:00:00
Title: Case C-316/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 21 May 2021 — Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent, other parties: Denys NV, Aelterman BVBA

9.8.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 320/28
            
         
      Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Belgium) lodged on 21 May 2021 — Monument Vandekerckhove NV v Stad Gent, other parties: Denys NV, Aelterman BVBA
      (Case C-316/21)
      (2021/C 320/27)
      Language of the case: Dutch
      
         Referring court
      
      Raad van State
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Monument Vandekerckhove NV
      
         Defendant: Stad Gent
      
         Interveners: Denys NV, Aelterman BVBA
      
         Questions referred
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Must the second paragraph of Article 63(1) of Directive 2014/24/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, taken on its own and in conjunction with the scope of the principles of European law, namely equality, non-discrimination and transparency in public procurement, be interpreted as meaning that, if the contracting authority ascertains that an entity on whose capacity an economic operator relies does not fulfil the selection criteria, it is obliged to request that entity’s replacement or that it has the option to request such replacement if the economic operator wishes to be selected?
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Are there circumstances in which, on the basis of the principles of equality, non-discrimination and transparency, and also depending on the conduct of the award procedure, the contracting authority is not, or is no longer, obliged, or is not, or is no longer, permitted to insist on replacement?
               
            
         (1)  OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.