CELEX: 62019TA0005
Language: en
Date: 2020-05-13 00:00:00
Title: Case T-5/19: Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Clatronic International v EUIPO (PROFI CARE) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark PROFI CARE — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Obligation to state reasons)

29.6.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 215/35
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 13 May 2020 — Clatronic International v EUIPO (PROFI CARE)
      (Case T-5/19) (1)
      
      (EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark PROFI CARE - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Obligation to state reasons)
      (2020/C 215/42)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Clatronic International GmbH (Kempen, Germany) (represented by: O. Löffel, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas and H. O’Neill, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 October 2018 (Case R 504/2018-1), relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark PROFI CARE.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders Clatronic International GmbH to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 82, 4.3.2019.