CELEX: 52012PC0371
Language: en
Date: 2012-07-19
Title: Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing specific conditions to fishing for deep-sea stocks in the North-East Atlantic and provisions for fishing in international waters of the North-East Atlantic and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002

|
			
		
		
		52012PC0371
		
			Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing specific conditions to fishing for deep-sea stocks in the North-East Atlantic and provisions for fishing in international waters of the North-East Atlantic and repealing Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002 /* COM/2012/0371 final - 2012/0179 (COD) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
The deep-sea fisheries in the North-East
Atlantic are partly dominated by traditional coastal fleets (Portugal) and
large nomadic trawlers (France, Spain). Altogether they account for
approximately 1% of landings from the North-East Atlantic, although the
economic viability of a number of fishing communities depends to a certain
extent on deep-sea fisheries. The fisheries are pursued in Union waters and in
international waters governed by agreements within the North East Atlantic
Fisheries Commission (NEAFC).
Deep-sea stocks
are fish stocks caught in waters beyond the main fishing grounds of continental
shelves. They are distributed on the continental slopes or associated with
seamounts. Deep-sea fisheries have only since 2003 been subject to detailed
management on fishing opportunities (total allowable catch, maximum fishing
effort). Before this, the fishery developed largely unregulated and partly
showed typical symptoms of the "race to fish" problem, resulting in
the depletion of stocks. 
Since the inception of management by
fishing opportunities, a number of technical measures were put in place that
restrict the use of certain gears in deeper waters or prohibit fishing in
certain areas of high biodiversity on the sea bottom. These area closures
represent follow-up by the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) to Member States'
designation of NATURA 2000 sites under the Habitats Directive[1], or are general precautionary
measures
NEAFC measures
in the area of deep-sea fishing which were adopted and transposed into Union
law comprise the ban of gillnets, closed areas to protect benthic habitats
which represent main sources of biodiversity (vulnerable marine ecosystems),
the capping of total annually expended fishing effort, and the mapping of the
existing fishing activity with the purpose of making new fisheries conditional
on a prior environmental impact assessment. 
These and other
technical measures recommended by NEAFC used to be implemented by an annual
Council Regulation on fishing opportunities before the entry into force of the
Treaty of Lisbon; since then a transitional regime[2] for the whole North-East
Atlantic is in force, including measures adopted in NEAFC. 
For
international waters not regulated by Regional Fisheries Management
Organisations the Union adopted a specific Regulation that prohibits the use of
bottom gears in the High Seas without prior impact assessment (Regulation (EC)
No 734/2008), responding to the UNGA resolution 61/105[3] on sustainable management of
deep-sea fisheries. 
Since 2002 the Union has in place a specific
access regime (Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002) for fishing vessels engaged in
deep-sea fisheries of the North-East Atlantic, made of four components:
capacity restriction, data collection, effort monitoring, and control. 
The measures so far taken have not
effectively solved the main problems of the fishery, namely:
(1)
the high vulnerability of these stocks to
fishing; many of them can only sustain a low fishing pressure over a longer period
that is economically not viable;
(2)
fishing with bottom trawls represents the
highest risk of destroying irreplaceable and vulnerable marine ecosystems by
fishing gear. The extent of destruction that has already occurred is unknown;
(3)
fishing with trawls for deep-sea species
involves high levels of undesired catch of deep-sea species (on average 20 to
40% in weight with individual peaks at much higher level); 
(4)
determining the sustainable level of fishing
pressure via scientific advice is particularly difficult.
Due to deep-sea stocks' high vulnerability to
fishing, stock depletion can occur within a short period of time, and recovery
might take very long or fail. The stocks' biological state is largely unknown.
Some are considered depleted, others have started to stabilise at low levels of
exploitation. In general the fisheries are not sustainable. Fishing
opportunities have consistently decreased since their regulation began.
Biological data from scientific surveys will probably remain insufficient to allow
for full analytical stock assessments in the coming years. The Commission is
exploring ways to improve the system of scientific surveys and data collection
with regard to deep-sea species for the next programming period. For the time
being, the management concept aiming at maximum
sustainable yield (MSY) can not be applied to deep-sea stocks due to shortage
of information. An important scientific project ("deepfishman") is
ongoing until 2012. This project attempts to develop harvest rules based on
secondary indicators, given that the primary indicators (fishing mortality and
stock size) are unknown (DEEPFISHMAN[4]
Ref 227390) 
Member States'
obligation in accordance with the Marine Framework Strategy Directive to
achieve or maintain a good environmental status of marine ecosystems by 2020[5] fosters a critical assessment
of the conditions for pursuing deep-sea fisheries, including environmental and
biodiversity aspects. 
The
general objective of the proposal is to ensure as much as possible the
sustainable exploitation of deep-sea stocks while reducing the environmental
impact of these fisheries, and to improve the information base for scientific
assessment. As long as data and method have not achieved the required level
allowing MSY-based management, the fisheries have to be managed according to
the precautionary approach to fisheries management.
In order to
reduce the destructive impact on the marine ecosystem, the use of bottom trawls
should be phased out in this fishery, as they are most harmful to vulnerable marine
ecosystems and have shown high levels of undesired catch of deep-sea species.
The transitional restrictions on bottom-set gillnets in fisheries below 600m
depth and in the depth-range 200-600m should be accompanied by a prohibition to
target deep-sea species.
The proposal
also considers the opportunity to simplify the management system for these
stocks, currently subject to a double instrument: catch limitations and
capacity/effort limitation. Where this duplication is not necessary to achieve
the objectives of this Regulation, proposals are made to regulate the concerned
fisheries with only one management instrument.
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS WITH THE
INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
Following the Communication on the review
of the 2002 access regime to the European Parliament and the Council[6], the Commission conducted an
impact assessment of future policy options by involving Member States and
Regional Advisory Councils (RACs). It also consulted the Scientific, Technical
and Economic Committee for Fisheries (STECF) on certain technical aspects of
the management of deep-sea fisheries.
The responses to the consultation showed a
broad agreement on the need to improve the 2002 access regime. However,
stakehoder's views diverged significantly on the measures to be implemented:
Member States highlighted the limited value
of effort reporting, effort management and capacity management in the current
set-up, in particular in view of the fact that the registered capacity (based
on the authorisations issued) does not really match the reality of the fishery.
Too many vessels seem to have an authorisation to fish deep-sea species which
make up only a small proportion of their total catches. Such vessels do not
really belong in a deep-sea fishing métier. Member States were also critical
about the discarding, which they claimed was partly induced by fisheries
regulation. They also stressed the importance of adapting the access regime to
the new control framework. They were cautious in relation to pre-defining the
management approach, at least before the conclusions of the ongoing scientific
project "DEEPFISHMAN" were established.
Concerning the list of species covered,
Member States acknowledged the need for coherent criteria but stressed that any
changes would have consequences for the fishing patterns and management.
Furthermore, they underlined the importance of respecting established rights
under the principle of relative stability. Finally, concerning the special
obligations on data collection, they opposed higher scientific coverage through
on-board observers and supported the integration of the deep-sea specific data
collection into the broader data collection framework, according to which some
métiers focussing on deep-sea species are already sampled. Some doubt was
expressed as to whether the costs involved in moving towards analytical stock
assessments could be justified in view of the small activity, favouring
therefore a precautionary management approach based on stock trends observed.
The Union's North-Western and South-Western
Waters RACs were consulted and underlined the need for a consistent definition
of deep-sea fisheries, and supported targeting management measures to those
vessels that are specialised in the métier. However, they suggested not to
prohibit those vessels from returning to the fishery which had a previous track
record and then contributed to stock recovery by turning to other fisheries in
more recent times. Effort management by métier was proposed, which might look
different for the groups of a few multi-métier large vessels compared to groups
of many small vessels. They called for more action aiming at the protection of
vulnerable marine ecosystems and a system of allocation, renewal and withdrawal
of fishing authorisations.
An alliance of non-governmental
organisations (the Deep-sea Conservation Coalition) pointed to the need for
introducing conditions to the use of bottom trawls similar to those applied in
the High Sea, and stressed the unresolved problem of undesired catch of deep-sea
species in the trawl fishery.
The assessment of impacts resulting from
different policy choices focussed on five options. Three of them were not
further considered because they were considered not representing meaningful
management approaches, with disadvantages largely outweighing advantages,
namely: (a) to continue the current regime amending it only by needed updates;
(b) to ban fishing for deep-sea species altogether, and (c) to scale the regime
down to being a tool for transposing measures adopted in NEAFC and applying
those measures also in Union waters.
The two options with relative advantage
were: (d) to phase out the most harmful fishing gears targeting deep-sea
species, or (e) to introduce in Union waters management standards that were
developed for bottom fishing on the High Sea. Option (d) was retained as being
a more effective and simpler instrument, while option (e) would result in
adding extensive regulatory requirements and their inherent constraints to
investment to a fishery already in decline. In view of fisheries
administrations being scaled down due to budgetary austerity measures, there is
no sufficient assurance of implementation on the ground of additional and
extensive measures.
Concerning simplification, the current
reporting system on species-related fishing effort should be discontinued.
Monitoring of fishing effort can better be ensured as a regular exercise by
annual data calls under the Data Collection Framework[7], accompanied by ad hoc
administrative reporting requests from the Commission, the latter to be used
for instance where there are doubts on the compliance with effort limits or
when the data quality is insufficient. The scope of the Regulation has been
refined in order to ensure that this Regulation fully concerns vessels which
are targeting deep-sea species, while ensuring that vessels which have these
species in their by-catch do not expand the fishery. Furthermore, the specific
data collection rules will be aligned with the Data Collection Framework,
ensuring that Member States use the same statistical standards and feed the
collected data into one unique storage and processing system. Non-compliance
with scientific data collection standards would result in the subsequent loss
of fishing opportunities as a precautionary management measure.
3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL
This proposal establishes a framework
Regulation for exercising fishing activity targeting deep-sea species in the
North-East Atlantics, comprising Union waters including outermost regions of
Spain and Portugal, and international waters.
Article 43(2) of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union serves as the legal basis. This proposal
falls under exclusive competence of the Union as referred to in Article 3(1)(d)
of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. The subsidiarity
principle therefore does not apply. 
Council Regulation (EC) No 2371/2002 of 20
December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation of fisheries
resources under the Common Fisheries Policy establishes the general framework
for the CFP. According to Article 4 thereof, Union measures governing access to
waters and resources and the sustainable pursuit of fishing activities shall be
established.
The proposal complies with the
proportionality principle. Member States are able to develop measures for their
own fleets that lead to a more sustainable management of deep-sea resources.
However, many deep-sea stocks are shared between Member States (in some cases
the fleet of one Member State is mostly present in the waters of another Member
State).This makes Member States reluctant to submit their own fleets to
restrictive measures unless the same or equivalent rules apply to neighbouring
fleets.
A regulation at Union level is the chosen
instrument of action. Self-regulation is not considered an option. According to
the experience with the development of unregulated deep-sea fisheries, it
cannot be expected with sufficient assurance that the sector would develop and
enforce its own code of conduct to ensure that it harvests these resources
sustainably.
4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION
The proposal has no implications for the
Union budget.
2012/0179 (COD)
Proposal for a
REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL
establishing specific conditions to
fishing for deep-sea stocks in the North-East Atlantic and provisions for
fishing in international waters of the North-East Atlantic and repealing
Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 43(2) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission[8],
After transmission of the draft legislative
act to the national Parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the
European Economic and Social Committee[9],
Acting in accordance with the ordinary
legislative procedure,
Whereas:
(1)       Council Regulation (EC) No
2371/2002 of 20 December 2002 on the conservation and sustainable exploitation
of fisheries resources under the Common Fisheries Policy[10] requires the establishment of
Community measures governing access to waters and resources and the sustainable
pursuit of fishing activities and necessary to ensure the rational and
responsible exploitation of resources on a sustainable basis. Article 2 of that
Regulation requires applying the ecosystem and precautionary approaches in
taking measures to minimise the impact of fishing activities on marine
ecosystems. 
(2)       The Union is committed to
implement the Resolutions adopted by the General Assembly of the United
Nations, in particular Resolutions 61/105 and 64/72, which call on States and
Regional Fisheries Management Organisations to ensure the protection of
vulnerable deep-sea marine ecosystems from the destructive impact of bottom
fishing gears, as well as the sustainable exploitation of deep-sea fish stocks.
(3)       The Commission evaluated
Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002 establishing specific access requirements and
associated conditions applicable to fishing for deep-sea stocks[11]. The Commission found[12] in particular,
that the scope of the fleet concerned was too large, that there was guidance
lacking on control in designated ports and on sampling programmes, and that the
quality of Member States' reporting of effort levels was too variable. 
(4)       In order to maintain
necessary reductions in fishing capacity achieved so far in deep-sea fisheries,
it is appropriate to provide that fishing for deep-sea species is subject to a
fishing authorisation which limits the capacity of vessels eligible to land
deep-sea species. With a view to focus management measures on the part of the
fleet most relevant for deep-sea fisheries, the fishing authorisations should
be issued according to target or by-catch fishery.
(5)       Holders of a fishing
authorisation allowing the catch of deep-sea species should cooperate in
scientific research activities leading to an improvement in the assessment of
deep-sea stocks and deep-sea ecosystems.
(6)       When targeting other
species in areas on the continental slope also authorised to deep-sea
fisheries, vessel owners should keep a fishing authorisation allowing deep-sea
by-catches.
(7)       Deep-sea fishing with
bottom trawls carry the highest risk for vulnerable marine ecosystems among the
different gears used and reports the highest rates of undesired catch of
deep-sea species. Bottom trawls should therefore be permanently prohibited from
the targeting of deep-sea species. 
(8)       Bottom-set gillnets are
currently restricted in entering deep-sea fisheries by Council
Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009 establishing transitional
technical measures from 1 January 2010 to 30 June 2011[13]. In view of the high rates of
undesired catch when they were deployed unsustainably in deep waters, and in
view of the ecological impact of lost and abandoned gear, this gear should also
be permanently prohibited from the targeting of deep-sea species. 
(9)       However, in order to
provide fishermen with sufficient time to adjust to the new requirements
current fishing authorisations for fishing with bottom trawls and bottom‑set
gillnets should continue to be valid for a specified period of time.
(10)     Moreover, vessels which
have to change gear in order to be able to stay in the fishery should be
eligible for receiving financial assistance from the European Fisheries Fund
provided that the new gear reduces the impact of fishing on non-commercial
species and provided also that the national operational programme allows
contributing to such measures.
(11)     Vessels targeting deep-sea
species with other bottom gear should not extend their range of operation
according to their authorisation within Union waters, unless expansion can be
assessed as not carrying a significant risk of negative impact on vulnerable
marine ecosystems.
(12)     Scientific advice
concerning certain fish stocks found in the deep-sea indicates that these
stocks are particularly vulnerable to exploitation, and that fishing for these
stocks should be limited or reduced as a precautionary measure. Fishing
opportunities for deep-sea stocks should not go beyond those levels which are
scientifically advised as precautionary. In the case of advice being absent for
lack of sufficient information about stocks or species, no fishing
opportunities should be allocated. 
(13)     Scientific advice further
indicates that fishing effort limits are an appropriate instrument for fixing
fishing opportunities for deep-sea fisheries. In view of the large variety of
gears and fishing patterns present in deep-sea fisheries, and the need to
develop accompanying measures tackling the environmentally weak points of the
fisheries indivdually, fishing effort limits should only replace catch limits
when it can be ensured that they are adapted to specific fisheries.
(14)     In order to ensure an
adapted management of the specific fisheries, Member States concerned should be
empowered to take accompanying conservation measures and to annually assess the
effort levels' consistency with scientific advice on sustainable exploitation.
The regionally adapted effort limits should also replace the existing global
limit on fishing effort agreed in the North-East Atlantic Fisheries Commission
(NEAFC).
(15)     Given that biological
information can best be collected by way of harmonised data collection
standards, it is appropriate to integrate data collection on deep-sea métiers
into the general framework of scientific data collection, while ensuring the
provision of additional information necessary to understand the dynamics of the
fisheries. For simplification purposes, the effort reporting by species should be
discontinued and replaced by the analysis of recurrent scientific data calls to
Member States which contain a specific chapter on deep-sea métiers.
(16)     Council Regulation (EC) No
1224/2009 of 20 November 2009 establishing a Community control system for
ensuring compliance with the rules of the common fisheries policy[14] lays down control and
enforcement requirements concerning multiannual plans. Deep-sea species, by
nature vulnerable to fishing, should receive the same attention in terms of
control as other conservation species for which a multiannual management plan
has been agreed.
(17)     Holders of a fishing
authorisation allowing for the catch of deep-sea species should lose their
authorisation as far as the catching of deep-sea species is concerned if they
do not comply with relevant conservation measures.
(18)     The Convention on future
multilateral cooperation in the North-East Atlantic fisheries was approved by
Decision 81/608/EEC and entered into force on 17 March 1982. That convention
provides for an appropriate framework for multilateral cooperation on the
rational conservation and management of fishery resources in international
waters of the North-East Atlantic. Management measures adopted in NEAFC
comprise technical measures for the conservation and management of species
regulated within NEAFC and for the protection of marine vulnerable habitats,
including precautionary measures.
(19)     The Commission should be
empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU to
specify measures accompanying annual effort limits if Member States fail to
take them or if the measures they adopt are deemed not to be compatible with the objectives of this regulation or
insufficient in respect of the aims indicated in this
regulation.
(20)     The Commission should be
empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 290 TFEU, which
may be necessary to amend or supplement non-essential elements of this
Regulation in cases of absence or insufficiency of the accompanying measures
adopted by the Member States and linked to annual effort limits, when these
replace catch limits.
(21)     It is therefore necessary
to put in place new rules to regulate fishing for deep-sea stocks in the
North-East Atlantic and to repeal Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002.
(22)     The Commission, when
preparing and drawing up delegated acts, should ensure a simultaneous, timely
and appropriate transmission of relevant documents to the European Parliament
and to the Council,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
CHAPTER I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Article 1
Objectives
The objectives of this Regulation are the
following:
(a)              
to ensure the sustainable exploitation of
deep-sea species while minimising the impact of deep-sea fishing activities on
the marine environment;
(b)              
to improve the scientific knowledge on deep-sea
species and their habitats for the purposes referred to in point (a);
(c)              
to implement technical measures on fisheries
management recommended by the North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission (NEAFC).
Article 2
Scope
This Regulation applies to fishing activities
or intended fishing activities in the following waters:
(a)          Union waters of International
Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) sub-areas II to XI and of Fishery Committee for the Eastern
Central Atlantic (CECAF) areas 34.1.1, 34.1.2
and 34.2, 
(b)          international waters of CECAF
areas 34.1.1, 34.1.2 and 34.2 and 
(c)          the Regulatory Area of the NEAFC,
Article 3
Definitions
1.           For the purposes of this
Regulation, the definitions laid down in Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No
2371/2002 and Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 734/2008[15] shall apply.
2.           In addition, the following
definitions shall apply:
(a)     "ICES zones" are as defined
in Regulation (EC) No 218/2009 of the European Parliament and of the
Council[16];
(b)     "CECAF areas" are as defined
in Regulation (EC) No 216/2009 of the European Parliament and of the
Council[17];

(c)     "Regulatory Area of the
NEAFC" means the waters subject to the Convention on future multilateral
cooperation in North-East Atlantic fisheries which lie beyond the waters under
the fisheries jurisdiction of the contracting parties to that Convention;
(d)     "deep-sea species" means the
species listed in Annex I; 
(e)     "most vulnerable species"
means the deep-sea species indicated in the third column 'Most vulnerable (x)'
of the table in Annex I;
(f)      "métier" means fishing
activities targeting certain species by a certain gear in a certain area;
(g)     "deep-sea métier" means a
métier that targets deep-sea species according to the indications laid down in
Article 4(1) of this regulation.
(h)     "fisheries monitoring
centre" means an operational centre established by a flag Member State and
equipped with computer hardware and software enabling automatic data reception,
processing and electronic data transmission;
(i)      "scientific advisory body"
means an international fisheries scientific body that meets international
standards for research-based scientific advice.
(j)      "maximum sustainable yield"
means the maximum catch that may be taken from a fish stock indefinitely.
CHAPTER II
FISHING AUTHORISATIONS
Article 4
Types of fishing authorisations 
1.           Fishing activities
targeting deep-sea species carried out by a Union fishing vessel, shall be
subject to a fishing authorisation, which shall indicate deep-sea species as
the target species. 
2.           For the purposes of
paragraph 1, fishing activities are deemed to target deep-sea species, if:
(a)     deep-sea species are noted as target
in the vessel's fishing calendar, or
(b)     a gear that is only used to catch
deep-sea species is carried on board of the vessel or deployed in the area of
operation, or 
(c)     the vessel's master records in the
logbook a percentage of deep-sea species equal or superior to 10% of the
overall catch weight in the fishing day concerned.
3.           Fishing activities not
targeting deep-sea species but catching deep-sea species as a by-catch, carried
out by a Union fishing vessel, shall be subject to a fishing authorisation,
which shall indicate deep-sea species as by-catch.
4.           The two types of fishing
authorisations referred to in paragraphs 1 and 3 respectively shall be clearly
distinguishable in the electronic database referred to in Article 116 of
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009. 
5.           Notwithstanding paragraphs
1 and 3, fishing vessels may catch, retain on board, tranship or land any
quantity of deep-sea species without a fishing authorisation, if that quantity
is below a threshold set at 100 kg of any mixture of deep-sea species per
fishing trip.
Article 5
Capacity management
The aggregate fishing capacity measured in
gross tonnage and in kilowatt of all fishing vessels holding a fishing
authorisation issued by a Member State, allowing the catch of deep-sea species,
whether as target or by-catch species, shall at no time exceed the aggregate
fishing capacity of vessels of that Member State which have landed 10 tonnes or
more of deep-sea species during any of the two calendar years preceding the
entry into force of this Regulation, whichever year provides the higher figure.
Article 6
General requirements for applications for fishing authorisations 
Each application for a fishing
authorisation allowing for the catch of deep-sea species whether as target or
by-catch species, and for its renewal shall be accompanied by a description of
the area where it is intended to conduct fishing activities, the type of gears,
the depth range at which the activities will be deployed, and of the individual
species targeted.
Article 7
Specific requirements for applications for and issuance of fishing
authorisations allowing the use use of bottom gears in fishing activities
targeting deep-sea species
1.           In addition to the
requirements set out in Article 6, each application for a fishing authorisation
for targeted deep sea fisheries, as referred to in Article 4(1), that allows
the use of bottom gears in Union waters as referred to in Article 2(a), shall
be accompanied by a detailed fishing plan specifying:
(a)     the locations of the intended
activities targeting deep-sea species in the deep-sea métier. The location(s)
shall be defined by coordinates in accordance with the World Geodetic System of
1984; 
(b)     the locations, if any, of activities
in the deep-sea métier during the last three full calendar years. Those
location(s) shall be defined by coordinates in accordance with the World
Geodetic System of 1984 and they shall circumscribe the fishing activities as
closely as possible.
2.           Any fishing authorisation
issued on the basis of an application made in accordance with paragraph 1 shall
specify the bottom gear to be used and limit the fishing activities authorised
to the area in which the intended fishing activity, as set out in paragraph
1(a), and the existing fishing activity, as set out in paragraph 1(b), overlap.
However, the area of the intended fishing activity can be extended beyond the
area of the existing fishing activity if the Member State has assessed and
documented, based on scientific advice, that such extension would not have
significant adverse impacts on vulnerable marine ecosystems.
Article 8
Participation by vessels in deep-sea fishery data collection activities 
Member States shall include the necessary
conditions in all fishing authorisations issued in accordance with Article 4 to
ensure that the vessel concerned participates, in cooperation with the relevant
scientific institute, in any data collection scheme whose scope would comprise
the fishing activities for which authorisations are delivered.
Article 9
Expiry of fishing authorisations targeting deep-sea species for vessels using
bottom trawls or bottom-set gillnets
Fishing authorisations referred to in Article
4(1) for vessels using bottom trawls or bottom-set gillnets shall expire at the
latest two years after the entry into force of this Regulation. After that
date,fishing authorisations targeting deep-sea species with those gears shall
neither be issued nor renewed.
CHAPTER III
FISHING OPPORTUNITIES AND ACCOMPANYING MEASURES
Section 1
General provisions
Article 10
Principles 
1.           Fishing opportunities
shall be fixed at a rate of exploitation of the deep-sea species concerned that
is consistent with maximum sustainable yield.
2.           Where, based on best
scientific information available, it is not possible to identify exploitation
rates consistent with maximum sustainable yield, the fishing opportunities
shall be fixed as follows:
a)      where the best scientific information
available identifies exploitation rates corresponding to the precautionary
approach to fisheries management, the fishing opportunities for the relevant
fishing management period may not be fixed higher than those rates;
b)      where the best scientific information
available does not identify exploitation rates corresponding to the
precautionary approach to fisheries management due to lack of sufficient data
concerning a certain stock or species, no fishing opportunities may be
allocated for the fisheries concerned.     
Section 2
Management by fishing effort limits
Article 11
Fishing opportunities by means of fishing effort limits only
1.           The Council, acting in
accordance with the Treaty, may decide to switch from the fixing of annual
fishing opportunities for deep-sea species in terms of both fishing effort
limits and catch limits to the fixing of only fishing effort limits for
specific fisheries.
2.           For the purposes of
paragraph 1, the fishing effort levels for each deep-sea métier that shall be
used as a baseline for any adjustmens required in order to follow the
principles set out in Article 10 shall be the fishing effort levels assessed,
based on scientific information, as consistent with the catches made by the
relevant deep-sea métiers during the previous two calendar years.
3.           Fishing effort limits
fixed in accordance with paragraphs 1 and 2 shall indicate:
(a)     the specific deep-sea métier to which
the fishing effort limit applies by reference to the regulated gear, the
species targeted and the ICES zones or CECAF areas within which the allowed
effort may be deployed; and
(b)     the fishing effort unit to be used for
management.
Article 12
Accompanying measures
1.           Where annual fishing
effort limits have replaced catch limits in accordance with Article 11(1),
Member States shall maintain or put in place, in respect of their flagged
vessels the following accompanying measures:
(a)     measures to avoid an increase of the
overall catching capacity of the vessels concerned by the effort limits.
(b)     measures to avoid an increase in
by-catches of most vulnerable species; and
(c)     conditions for effective discard
prevention. Those conditions shall aim at landing all fish taken on board,
unless this would be contrary to the rules in force under the Common Fisheries
Policy.
2.           The measures shall remain
in force for as long as the need remains to prevent or mitigate the risks
identified in paragraphs 1(a), (b) and (c). 
3.           The Commission shall
assess the effectiveness of the accompanying measures adopted by Member States
upon their adoption.
Article 13 
Commission measures in case of absence or insufficiency of the accompanying
measures adopted by the Member States 
1.           The Commission shall be
empowered to adopt delegated acts to specify measures accompanying annual
effort limits as referred to in Article 12(1)(a), (b) or (c), and in accordance
with Article 20:
(a)     if the Member State concerned does not
notify to the Commission any measures adopted pursuant to Article 12 within
three months after the date of entry into force of the fishing effort limits.
(b)     if the measures adopted pursuant to
Article 12 cease to be in force although the need remains to prevent or
mitigate the risks identified in Article 12(1) (a), (b) and (c).]
2.           The Commission shall be
empowered to adopt delegated acts in accordance with Article 20 to specify
measures accompanying annual effort limits, as referred to in Article 12(a),
(b) or (c), if, on the basis of an assessment carried
out pursuant to Article 12(3),
(a)     Member State
measures are deemed not to be
compatible with the objectives of this regulation; or
(b)     Member State measures are deemed insufficient in respect of the aims stated in Article 12 (1) (a), (b) or (c).
3.           The accompanying measures
adopted by the Commission shall aim at ensuring that the objectives and aims
set out in this regulation are met. Upon the adoption
of the delegated act by the Commission, any Member
State measures adopted shall cease to to apply.
CHAPTER IV
CONTROL 
Article 14
Application of the control provisions for multiannual plans
1.           This Regulation shall be construed as a 'multiannual plan' for the
purposes of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009.
2.           Deep-sea species shall be
regarded as the 'species subject to a multiannual plan' and the 'stocks subject to a multiannual plan' for the purposes of Regulation (EC) No
1224/2009. 
Article 15
Designated ports 
No quantity of any mixture of deep-sea
species in excess of 100 kg may be landed at any place other than the ports
which have been designated for landing deep-sea species.
Article 16
Prior notification 
By way of derogation of Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, the masters of all Union
fishing vessels intending to land 100 kg or more of deep-sea species, whichever
their length, shall be required to notify their flag Member State's competent
authority of that intention.
Article 17
Logbook entries in deep waters
Without prejudice to Articles 14 and 15 of
Regulation (EC) No 1224/2009, masters of fishing vessels holding an
authorisation in accordance with Article 4(1) or (3) shall, when engaged in a
deep-sea métier or when fishing below 400 m:
(a)     draw a new line in the paper logbook
after each haul; or,
(b)     when they are subject to the
electronic recording and reporting system, record separately after each haul.
Article 18
Withdrawal of fishing authorisations
1.           Without prejudice to
Article 7(4) of Regulation (EC) 1224/2009, the fishing authorisations referred
to in Article 4(1) and (3) of this Regulation shall be withdrawn for a duration
of at least one year in the following cases:
a)      failure to conform to the conditions
set in the fishing authorisation with regard to limits on the use of gears,
allowed areas of operation or, as appropriate, catch or effort limits on the
species whose targeting is allowed; or
b)      failure to take on board a scientific
observer or to allow sampling of catches for scientific purposes as specified
in Article 19 of this Regulation.
2.           Paragraph 1 shall not
apply if the failures referred to therein have been caused by force majeure.
CHAPTER V
DATA COLLECTION
Article 19
Rules on data collection and reporting
1.           Member States shall
collect data on each deep-sea métier in accordance with the rules on data
collection and the precision levels laid down in the multiannual Community
programme for collection, management and use of biological, technical,
environmental, and socio-economic data adopted in accordance with Council
Regulation (EC) No 199/2008[18]
and in other measures adopted under that Regulation. 
2.           The master of a vessel, or
any other person responsible for the vessel's operation, shall be required to
take on board the scientific observer whom the Member State has assigned for
his vessel, unless this is not possible for security reasons. The master shall
facilitate the discharging of the scientific observer's tasks. 
3.           The scientific observers
shall:
(a)     carry out their recurrent data
collection tasks, as set out in paragraph 1.
(b)     identify and document the weight of
any stony coral, soft coral, sponges or other organisms belonging to the same
ecosystem taken on board by the vessel's gear.
4.           In addition to their
obligations referred to in paragraph 1, Member States shall be subject to the
specific data collection and reporting requirements set out in Annex II for the
deep sea métier. 
5.           Data collected in relation
to the deep-sea métier, including all data collected in accordance with Annex
II, shall be treated in accordance with the data management process as laid
down in chapter III of Regulation (EC) No 199/2008.
6.           Upon a request from the
Commission, Member States shall submit monthly reports on of effort deployed
and/or catches broken down by métier.
CHAPTER V
DELEGATED ACTS
Article 20
Exercise of delegated powers
1.           The power to adopt
delegated acts is conferred on the Commission subject to the conditions laid
down in this Article. 
2.           The power to adopt
delegated acts as referred to in Article 13 shall be conferred on the
Commission for an indeterminate period of time.
3.           The delegation of power
referred to in Article 13 may be revoked at any time by the European Parliament
or by the Council. A decision of revocation shall put an end to the delegation
of the power specified in that decision. It shall take effect the day following
the publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European
Union or at a later date specified therein. It shall not affect the
validity of any delegated acts already in force.
4.           As soon as it adopts a
delegated act, the Commission shall notify it simultaneously to the European
Parliament and to the Council.
5.           A delegated act adopted
pursuant to Article 13 shall enter into force only if no objection has been
expressed either by the European Parliament or the Council within a period of
2 months of notification of that act to the European Parliament and the Council
or if, before the expiry of that period, the European Parliament and the
Council have both informed the Commission that they will not object. That
period shall be extended by 2 months at the initiative of the
European Parliament or the Council.
CHAPTER VI
EVALUATION AND FINAL PROVISIONS
Article 21
Evaluation
1.           Within six years from the
entry into force of this Regulation, the Commission shall, on the basis of
Member States' reports and scientific advice that it shall request to this
effect, evaluate the impact of the measures laid down in this Regulation and
determine to what extent the objectives referred to in Article 1(a) and (b)
have been achieved.
2.           The evaluation shall focus
on trends in the following subjects:
(a)     the vessels
that have changed to using gears with a reduced impact on the sea bottom, and
the development of their discard levels;
(b)     the range of operation of vessels
engaging in each deep-sea métier;
(c)     the completeness and reliability of
data that Member States provide to scientific bodies for the purpose of stock
assessment, or to the Commission in case of specific data calls;
(d)     the deep-sea stocks for which the
scientific advice has improved;
(e)     the fisheries that are managed
according to fishing effort limits only, and the effectiveness of accompanying measures to eliminate discards and reduce catches of most
vulnerable species.
Article 22
Transitional measures 
Special fishing authorisations issued in
accordance with Regulation (EC) No 2347/2002 shall remain valid until their
replacement by fishing authorisations allowing the catch of deep-sea species
issued in accordance with this Regulation, but shall in any case no longer be
valid after 30 September 2012.
Article 23
Repeal
1.           Regulation (EC) No
2347/2002 is repealed. 
2.           References to the repealed
Regulation shall be construed as references to this Regulation in accordance
with the correlation table set out in Annex III to this Regulation] 
Article 24
Entry into force
This Regulation shall enter into force on
the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal
of the European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding
in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 
For the European Parliament                       For
the Council
The President                                                 The
President
[…]                                                                […]      
Annex I
Section 1: Deep-sea species
 Scientific name || Common name || Most vulnerable (x) 
 Centrophorus granulosus Centrophorus squamosus Centroscyllium fabricii Centroscymnus coelolepis Centroscymnus crepidater Dalatias licha Etmopterus princeps Apristuris spp Chlamydoselachus anguineus Deania calcea Galeus melastomus Galeus murinus Hexanchus griseus Etmopterus spinax Oxynotus paradoxus Scymnodon ringens Somniosus microcephalus || Gulper shark Leafscale gulper shark Black dogfish Portuguese dogfish Longnose velvet dogfish Kitefin shark Greater lanternshark Iceland catchark Frilled shark Birdbeak dogfish Blackmouth dogfish Mouse catshark Bluntnose six-gilled shark Velvet belly Sailfin roughshark (Sharpback shark) Knifetooth dogfish Greenland shark || x x x x x x x           x         
 Alepocephalidae Alepocephalus Bairdii Alepocephalus rostratus || Smoothheads (Slickheads) Baird's smoothhead Risso's smoothhead ||   
 Aphanopus carbo || Black scabbardfish ||   
 Argentina silus || Greater silver smelt ||   
 Beryx spp. || Alfonsinos ||   
 Chaceon (Geryon) affinis || Deep-water red crab ||   
 Chimaera monstrosa Hydrolagus mirabilis Rhinochimaera atlantica || Rabbit fish (rattail) Large-eyed rabbitfish (Ratfish) Straightnose rabbitfish ||   
 Coryphaenoides rupestris || Roundnose grenadier ||   
 Epigonus telescopus || Black cardinalfish || x 
 Helicolenus dactilopterus || Bluemouth (Bluemouth redfish) ||   
 Hoplostethus atlanticus || Orange roughy || x 
 Macrourus berglax || Roughhead grenadier (Rough rattail) ||   
 Molva dypterigia || Blue ling ||   
 Mora moro Antimora rostrata || Common mora Blue antimora (Blue hake) ||   
 Pagellus bogaraveo || Red (blackspot) seabream ||   
 Phycis blennoides || Greater Forkbeard ||   
 Polyprion americanus || Wreckfish ||   
 Reinhardtius hippoglossoides || Greenland halibut ||   
 Cataetyx laticeps ||   ||   
 Hoplosthetus mediterraneus || Silver roughy (Pink) ||   
 Macrouridae other than Coryphaenoides rupestris and Macrourus berglax || Grenadiers (rattails) other than roundnose grenadier and roughhead grenadier ||   
 Nesiarchus nasutus || Black gemfish ||   
 Notocanthus chemnitzii || Snubnosed spiny eel ||   
 Raja fyllae Raja hyperborea Raja nidarosiensus || Round skate Arctic skate Norwegian skate ||   
 Trachyscorpia cristulata || Spiny (deep-sea) scorpionfish ||   
Section 2: Species regulated in NEAFC in
addition 
 Brosme brosme || Tusk ||   
 Conger conger || Conger eel ||   
 Lepidopus caudatus || Silver scabbard fish (Cutless fish) ||   
 Lycodes esmarkii || Greater Eelpout ||   
 Molva molva || Ling ||   
 Sebastes viviparus || Small redfish (Norway haddock) ||   
Annex II
Specific data collection and reporting requirements referred to in Article
18(4)
1.           Member States shall ensure
that data collected for an area that comprises both Union waters and
international waters shall be further disaggregated so that they refer either
to Union waters or international waters
separately.
2.           Where the activity in the
deep-sea métier overlaps with activity in another métier in the same area, the
data collection concerning the former shall be done separately from the data
collection concerning the latter.
3.           Discards shall be sampled
in all deep-sea métiers. The sampling strategy for landings and discards shall
cover all the species listed in Annex I as well as species belonging to the
seabed ecosystem such as deep-water corals, sponges or other organisms
belonging to the same ecosystem .
4.           Where the applicable
multiannual data collection plan requires the collection of fishing effort data
in terms of hours fished by trawls and soak time for passive gear, the Member
State shall collect and be ready to present, together with such fishing effort
data, the following additional data:
(a)     geographical location of the fishing
activities on a haul-by-haul basis, from vessel monitoring system data
transmitted by the vessel to the fisheries monitoring centre;
(b)     the fishing depths at which the gears
are deployed in case the vessel is subject to reporting by electronic logbook.
The master of the vessel shall notify fishing depth following the standardised
reporting format. 
[1]               Council Directive 92/43/EEC of 21 May 1992 on the
conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, OJ L 206,
22.7.1992, p. 7.
[2]               Regulation (EC) No 1288/2009, OJ L 347, 24.12.2009, p 6.
[3]               A/RES/61/105 of 8 December 2006 - Sustainable
fisheries, including through the 1995 Agreement for the Implementation of the
Provisions of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10
December 1982 relating to the Conservation and Management of Straddling Fish
Stocks and Highly Migratory Fish Stocks, and related instruments. 
[4]                http://cordis.europa.eu/fetch?CALLER=FP7_PROJ_ES&ACTION=D&DOC=19&CAT=PROJ&QUERY=01308a670983:f6dc:57618e7e&RCN=90982
[5]               See Marine Strategy Framework Directive, Directive
2008/56/EC, OJ L 164, 25.6.2008, p. 19.
[6]               COM(2007)30 final.
[7]               Based on Regulation (EC) No 199/2008.
[8]               , , p. .
[9]               , , p. .
[10]             OJ L 358, 31.12.2002, p. 59.
[11]             OJ L 351, 28.12.2002, p. 6.
[12]             COM(2007) 30 final.
[13]             OJ L 347, 24.12.2009, p. 6.
[14]             OJ L 343, 22.12.2009, p. 1.
[15]             OJ L 201, 30.7.2008, p. 8.
[16]             OJ L 87, 31.3.2009, p. 70.
[17]             OJ L 87, 31.3.2009, p. 1.
[18]             OJ L 60, 5.3.2008, p. 1.