CELEX: 62018TN0744
Language: en
Date: 2018-12-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-744/18: Action brought on 20 December 2018 — Oakley v EUIPO — Xuebo Ye (Representation of a discontinuous ellipse)

18.2.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 65/45
            
         
      Action brought on 20 December 2018 — Oakley v EUIPO — Xuebo Ye (Representation of a discontinuous ellipse)
      (Case T-744/18)
      (2019/C 65/58)
      Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Oakley (Foothill Ranch, California, United States) (represented by: E. Ochoa Santamaría and I. Aparicio Martínez, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Xuebo Ye (Wenzhou, China)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
      
         Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of a discontinuous ellipsis) — Application for registration No 13 088 191
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 October 2018 in Case R 692/2018-1
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  declare the application admissible, together with all the associated documents;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  rule that the evidence offered may be submitted;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  grant the application, annulling the contested decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order EUIPO to pay the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law
      
      Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.