CELEX: C1995/087/01
Language: en
Date: 1995-04-08 00:00:00
Title: JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Fourth Chamber) of 16 February 1995 in Joined Cases C-29/94, C-30/94, C-31/94, C-32/94, C-33/94, C-34/94 and C-35/94 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance de Charleville-Mézières (France)): Criminal proceedings against Jean-Louis Aubertin, Bernard Collignon, Guy Creusot, Isabelle Diblanc, Gilles Josse, Jacqueline Martin, Claudie Normand (Hairdressers - Council Directive 82/489/EEC)

8 . 4. 95           LEN                   Official Journal of the European Communities                                 No C 87/1
                                                                  I
                                                            (Information)
                                              COURT OF JUSTICE
                                                         COURT OF JUSTICE
               JUDGMENT OF THE COURT                                  interpreted as not precluding national rules which require
                       (Fourth Chamber)                               that nationals of that Member State hold a diploma in order
                                                                      to operate a hairdressing salon, while permitting
                     of 16 February 1995                              hairdressers who are nationals of other Member States to
in Joined Cases C-29/94, C-30/94, C-31/94, C-32/94,                   operate a hairdressing salon without holding such a diploma
C-33/94, C-34/94 and C-35/94 (reference for a preliminary             and without being obliged to entrust its operation to a
ruling from the Tribunal de Grande Instance de                        manager holding that diploma.
Charleville-Mézières (France)): Criminal proceedings
against Jean-Louis Aubertin, Bernard Collignon, Guy                   (!) OJ No C 76, 12 . 3 . 1993 .
Creusot, Isabelle Diblanc, Gilles Josse, Jacqueline Martin,           (2 ) OJ No L 218 , 27. 7. 1982, p. 24 .
                     Claudie Normand ( 1 )
       (Hairdressers — Council Directive 82/489/EEC)
                          ( 95/C 87/01 )
                (Language of the case: French)                                      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                                              (Fifth Chamber)
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be                               of 23 February 1995
          published in the European Court Reports)
                                                                      in Case C-334/93 (reference for a preliminary ruling from
                                                                      the Finanzgericht Diisseldorf): Bonapharma Arzneimittel
In Joined Cases C-29/94, C-30/94, C-31/94, C-32/94,                                GmbH v. Hauptzollamt Krefeld ( ! )
C-33/94, C-34/94 and C-35/94: reference to the Court                  (EEC — Austria free-trade agreement — Concept of
under Article 177 of the EC Treaty from the Tribunal de               originating product — Protocol 3 — Methods of
Grande Instance (Regional Court), Charleville-Mezieres                      administrative cooperation — EUR.l certificate)
( France ), for a preliminary ruling in the criminal
                                                                                                ( 95/C 87/02
proceedings pending before that court against Jean-Louis
Aubertin, Bernard Collignon, Guy Creusot, Isabelle
Diblanc, Gilles Josse, Jacqueline Martin, Claudie Normand                            (Language of the case: German)
— on the interpretation of Council Directive 82/489/EEC of
 19 July 1982 laying down measures to facilitate the effective        (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
exercise of the right of establishment and freedom to                          published in the European Court Reports)
provide services in hairdressing (2 ) — the Court (Fourth
Chamber), composed of P.J.G. Kapteyn, President of the                In Case C-334/93 : reference to the Court under Article 177
Chamber, C.N. Kakouris ( Rapporteur), and J.L. Murray,
Judges; C.O. Lenz, Advocate-General; R.Grass, Registrar,              of the EEC Treaty by the Finanzgericht (Finance Court),
gave a judgment on 16 February 1995 , the operative part of           Diisseldorf, Germany for a preliminary ruling in the
which is as follows :                                                 proceedings pending before that court between
                                                                      Bonapharma Arzneimittel GmbH and Hauptzollamt
                                                                      Krefeld, on the interpretation of the Agreement between the
Community law, in particular Council Directive                        European Economic Community and the Republic of
 82/489/EEC of 19 July 1982 laying down measures to                   Austria, signed in Brussels on 22 July 1972 and approved by
facilitate the effective exercise of the right of establishment       Council Regulation (EEC) No 2836/72 of 19 December
and freedom to provide services in hairdressing, must be               1972 concluding an Agreement between the European