CELEX: C1997/228/34
Language: en
Date: 1997-07-26 00:00:00
Title: Action brought on 16 April 1997 by Richardus Ritterbeeks against the Commission of the European Communities (Case T-118/97)

26 . 7 . 97           EN                  Official Journal of the European Communities                                  No C 228/ 15
     ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                            Garcia-Valdecasas, President, J. Azizi and M. Jaeger,
                       of 28 May 1997                                Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 3 June
                                                                     1997, the operative part of which is as follows:
in Case T-145/95 : Proderec — Formação e Desenvolvi­
mento de Recursos Humanos, ACE v. Commission of the                  1 . There is no need to give a decision.
                  European Communities (')
(Action for annulment — Contested measure withdrawn                  2. The defendant shall pay the costs.
in the course of proceedings — No need to give a
                             decision)                               H OJ No C 197, 6 . 7. 1996 .
                           97/C 228/31 )
              (Language of the case: Portuguese)
In Case T-145/95 : Proderec — Forma^ao e Desenvolvi­                 Action brought on 16 April 1997 by Jill Valerie Hanna
mento de Recursos Humanos, ACE, whose registered                           against the Commission of the European Communities
office is in Almada ( Portugal ), represented by Manuel                                           ( Case T-117/97)
Rodrigues, of the Lisbon Bar, against Commission of the                                              ( 97/C 228/33 )
European Communities ( Agents : initially Ana Maria Alves
Vieira and Giinter Wilms, subsequently Maria Teresa                                     (Language of the case: French)
Figueira and Knut Simonsson ) — application for the
annulment, under Article 173 of the EC Treaty, of a                  An action against the Commission of the European
 Commission decision notified to the applicant by a letter           Communities was brought before the Court of First
of 11 May 1995 amending and reducing the amount                      Instance of the European Communities on 16 April 1997
initially approved and granted by an earlier decision                by Jill Valerie Hanna, residing at Kraainem ( Belgium ),
 approving File Nos 881311 PI and 880249 P3 — the                    represented by Nicolas Lhoest, of the Brussels Bar, with an
 Court of First Instance ( Fourth Chamber), composed of K.           address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of Fidu­
 Lenaerts, President, P. Lindh and J. D. Cooke, Judges; H.           ciaire Myson Sari, 30, Rue de Cessange .
Jung, Registrar, made an order on 28 May 1997, the
 operative part of which is as follows :                             The applicant claims that the Court should:
 1 . There is no need to give a decision.                            — annul the Commission's decision of 12 June 1996
                                                                             rejecting the applicant's request that it give
                                                                             consideration to the possible application of
 2 . The Commission shall pay the costs.                                     Article 31 ( 2 ) of the Staff Regulations,
 O OJ No C 268 , 14 . 10 . 1995 .                                    — annul, in so far as may be necessary, the Commission's
                                                                             decision adopted on 27 December 1996 expressly
                                                                             rejecting the applicant's complaint,
                                                                      — order the defendant to pay all the costs .
     ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                             Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:
                         of 3 June 1997
                                                                      The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as in
 in Case T-58/96: Partex — Companhia Portuguesa de Ser­               Case T-16/97 ( ! ).
  viços SA v. Commission of the European Communities (')
               (Case not proceeding to judgment)                      ( 5 ) OJ No C 74, 8 . 3 . 1997, p . 27.
                          ( 97/C 228/32
               (Language of the case: Portuguese)
 In Case T-58/96: Partex — Companhia Portuguesa de Ser­               Action brought on 16 April 1997 by Richardus
 vi^os SA, having its registered office in Lisbon, represented        Ritterbeeks against the Commission of the European
                                                                                                       Communities
 by Rui Chancerelle de Machete, Pedro Machete and
 Miguel Pena Machete, of the Lisbon Bar, with an address                                           ( Case T-l 18/97 )
 for service in Luxemburg at the Chambers of Louis                                                     97/C 228/34 )
 Schiltz, 2 Rue du Fort Rheinsheim, against Commission of
 the European Communities (Agents: Francisco de Sousa                                    (Language of the case: French)
 Fialho and Knut Simonsson ) — application for the
 annulment of the decision by which the Commission                    An action against the Commission of the European
 approved the request for payment of the balance relating              Communities was brought before the Court of First
 to File 88 0412 P3 of the European Social Fund — the                  Instance of the European Communities on 16 April 1997
 Court of First Instance ( Fifth Chamber), composed of: R.             by Richardus Ritterbeeks, residing at Landgraaf
 ---pagebreak--- No C 228/ 16            EN                  Official Journal of the European Communities                                 26 . 7 . 97
(Netherlands ), represented by Nicolas Lhoest, of the                  Action brought on 16 April 1997 by Philippe Lammens
Brussels Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at                against the Commission of the European Communities
the offices of Fiduciaire Myson Sari, 30, Rue de Cessange.                                       ( Case T-120/97)
                                                                                                   ( 97/C 228/36 )
The applicant claims that the Court should:
                                                                                       (Language of the case: French)
— annul the Commission's decision of 20 June 1996
    rejecting the applicant's request that it give                     An action against the Commission of the European
    consideration to the possible application of                       Communities was brought before the Court of First
    Article 31 ( 2 ) of the Staff Regulations,                         Instance of the European Communities on 16 April 1997
                                                                       by Philippe Lammens, residing at Heme ( Belgium ),
— annul, in so far as may be necessary, the Commission's               represented by Nicolas Lhoest, of the Brussels Bar, with an
    decision adopted on 27 December 1996 expressly                     address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of Fidu­
    rejecting the applicant's complaint,                               ciaire Myson Sari, 30, Rue de Cessange.
— order the defendant to pay all the costs .                           The applicant claims that the Court should:
Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:                    — annul the Commission's decision of 18 June 1996
                                                                            rejecting the applicant's request that it give
The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as in                      consideration to the possible application of
Case T-16/97 ( M.                                                           Article 31 ( 2 ) of the Staff Regulations,
(') OJ No C 74, 8 . 3 . 1997, p . 27.                                  — annul, in so far as may be necessary, the Commission's
                                                                            decision adopted on 27 December 1996 expressly
                                                                            rejecting the applicant's complaint,
                                                                       — order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Action brought on 16 April 1997 by Gerhard Keinhorst                   Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:
   against the Commission of the European Communities
                         ( Case T-l 19/97 )                            The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as in
                           ( 97/C 228/35 )                             Case T-16/97 ( l ).
                (Language of the case: French)                         (') OJ No C 74 , 8 . 3 . 1997, p. 27.
An action against the Commission of the European
 Communities was brought before the Court of First
Instance of the European Communities on 16 April 1997
 by Gerhard Keinhorst, residing at Tervuren ( Belgium ),
represented by Nicolas Lhoest, of the Brussels Bar, with an            Action brought on 22 April 1997 by Angela Pollitzer
 address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of Fidu­                against the Commission of the European Communities
ciaire Myson Sari, 30, Rue de Cessange .                                                          (Case T-129/97 )
                                                                                                    ( 97/C 228/37)
The applicant claims that the Court should:
                                                                                        (Language of the case: French)
— annul the Commission's decision of 18 June 1996
     rejecting the applicant's request that it give                    An action against the Commission of the European
     consideration to the possible application of                      Communities was brought before the Court of First
     Article 31 (2 ) of the Staff Regulations,                         Instance of the European Communities on 22 April 1997
                                                                        by Angela Pollitzer, residing at Kraainem ( Belgium ),
— annul , in so far as may be necessary, the Commission's              represented by Nicolas Lhoest, of the Brussels Bar, with an
     decision adopted on 27 December 1996 expressly                    address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of Fidu­
     rejecting the applicant's complaint,                              ciaire Myson Sari, 30, Rue de Cessange.
 — order the defendant to pay all the costs.                           The applicant claims that the Court should:
 Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:                   — annul the Commission's decision of 20 June 1996
                                                                            rejecting the applicant's request that it give
 The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as in                     consideration to the possible application of
 Case T-l 6/9 7 ( ] ).                                                      Article 31 ( 2 ) of the Staff Regulations,
 H OJ No C 74, 8 . 3 . 1997, p . 27.                                   — annul, in so far as may be necessary, the Commission's
                                                                            decision adopted on 27 December 1996 expressly
                                                                            rejecting the applicant's complaint,