CELEX: 62021CN0681
Language: en
Date: 2021-11-11 00:00:00
Title: Case C-681/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 11 November 2021 — Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau

21.2.2022   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 84/25
            
         
      Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 11 November 2021 — Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau
      (Case C-681/21)
      (2022/C 84/32)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Referring court
      
      Verwaltungsgerichtshof
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Authority bringing the appeal on a point of law: Versicherungsanstalt öffentlich Bediensteter, Eisenbahnen und Bergbau, represented by the Finanzprokuratur (body providing legal advice to the Austrian Government)
      
         Interested party: B
      
         Question referred
      
      Are Article 2(1) and 2(2)(a) and Article 6(1) of Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (1) and the principles of legal certainty, maintenance of established rights and effectiveness of EU law to be interpreted as precluding national legislation — such as that at issue in the main proceedings — under which a previously advantaged category of civil servants is retroactively no longer entitled to pension benefits accruing on the basis of a pension adjustment, and which, in that way (retroactive removal of the previously advantaged category by now placing it on an equal footing with the previously disadvantaged category), has the effect that the previously disadvantaged category of civil servants is also not/no longer entitled to pension benefits accruing on the basis of the pension adjustment to which the latter category would have been entitled because of discrimination on grounds of age which has already been (on several occasions) judicially established — as a result of the non-application of a national provision which is contrary to EU law for the purpose of establishing equal treatment with the previously advantaged category?
      
         (1)  OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16.