CELEX: 62017TA0222
Language: en
Date: 2019-05-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-222/17: Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Recylex and Others v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for lead-acid car battery recycling — Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU — Coordination of purchase prices — Fines — Point 26 of the 2006 Leniency Notice — Point 37 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines — Unlimited jurisdiction)

22.7.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 246/17
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 23 May 2019 — Recylex and Others v Commission
      (Case T-222/17) (1)
      
      (Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for lead-acid car battery recycling - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU - Coordination of purchase prices - Fines - Point 26 of the 2006 Leniency Notice - Point 37 of the Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Unlimited jurisdiction)
      (2019/C 246/17)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicants: Recylex SA (Paris, France), Fonderie et Manufacture de Métaux SA (Brussels, Belgium), Harz-Metall GmbH (Goslar, Germany) (represented by: M. Wellinger, S. Reinart and K. Bongs, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: I. Rogalski, J. Szczodrowski and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for a reduction of the amount of the fine imposed on the applicants in Commission Decision C(2017) 900 final of 8 February 2017 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU (Case AT.40018 — Car battery recycling).
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     Dismisses the action;
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     Orders Recylex SA, Fonderie et Manufacture de Métaux SA and Harz-Metall GmbH to pay the costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 195, 19.6.2017.