CELEX: 62010CB0609
Language: en
Date: 2011-04-14 00:00:00
Title: Case C-609/10 P: Order of the Court of 14 April 2011 — Dieter C. Umbach v European Commission (Appeal — Access to the documents of the Institutions — ‘TACIS programme’ — Contract concluded by the Commission — Termination of the contract — Dispute between the contracting parties — Application for access to documents — Manifest inadmissibility)

16.7.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 211/9
            
         Order of the Court of 14 April 2011 — Dieter C. Umbach v European Commission
   (Case C-609/10 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Access to the documents of the Institutions - ‘TACIS programme’ - Contract concluded by the Commission - Termination of the contract - Dispute between the contracting parties - Application for access to documents - Manifest inadmissibility)
   2011/C 211/15
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Dieter C. Umbach (represented by: M. Stephani, Rechtsanwalt)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Costa de Oliveira and T. Scharf, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 21 October 2010 in Case T-474/08 Umbach v Commission, by which the General Court dismissed an action for the annulment of the Commission Decision of 2 September 2008 refusing the appellant access to certain information included in documents relating to a contract concluded between the appellant and the Commission and concerning assistance with the drafting of an administrative code on behalf of the Russian Federation in the context of the TACIS programme — Application for access concerning the dispute between the appellant and the Commission following the termination of that contract — Infringement of Article 41(2)(b) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Umbach shall pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 89, 19.3.2011.