CELEX: C2007/117/58
Language: en
Date: 2007-05-26 00:00:00
Title: Case F-26/07: Action brought on 21 March 2007 — Potoms and Scillia v Parliament

26.5.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 117/37
            
         Action brought on 21 March 2007 — Potoms and Scillia v Parliament
   (Case F-26/07)
   (2007/C 117/58)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicants: Gerrit Potoms (Mechelen, Belgium) and Mario Scillia (Brussels, Belgium) (both represented by S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Parliament
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               declare that Articles 5 and 12 of Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations are unlawful;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the individual decisions appointing the applicants to an administrator post inasmuch as they determine their classification pursuant to article 5(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations;
            
         
               —
            
            
               declare that the implementing measures relating to the awarding of merit and promotion points are unlawful inasmuch as they provide for the cancellation of merit and promotion points on transfer from one function group to another;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the individual decisions to cancel the merit and promotion points accumulated by the applicants in their former category;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the individual decisions to apply a multiplier lower than 1 to determine the applicants' remuneration;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   The applicants assert pleas in law very similar to those relied on in Case F-31/06 (1)
   
   
      (1)  OJ C 131 of 3.6.2006, p. 50.