CELEX: 
Language: en
Date: 1003-03-03
Title: Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the signature of the Agreement between the European Community and Romania establishing certain conditions for the carriage of goods by road and the promotion of Combined Transport # Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the conclusion of the Agreement between the European Community and Romania establishing certain conditions for the carriage of goods by road and the promotion of Combined Transport

Avis juridique important

|

52001PC0045(01)

Proposal for a Council Decision concerning the signature of the Agreement between the European Community and Romania establishing certain conditions for the carriage of goods by road and the promotion of Combined Transport  /* COM/2001/0045 final - AVC 2001/0032 */  

Official Journal 154 E , 29/05/2001 P. 0226 - 0226

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the signature of the Agreement between the European Community and Romania establishing certain conditions for the carriage of goods by road and the promotion of Combined Transport(presented by the Commission)EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUMA. General Background1. On 7 December 1995, the Council authorised the Commission to negotiate one or more agreements on road transit with Hungary, Romania and Bulgaria with a view to resolving the problem of road goods transport relations between Greece and the other Member States, in particular through the mutual exchange of road transit authorizations. The agreement was also to specify the conditions for transport operations carried out under such an agreement, especially as regards charges related to transport operations and road use. More generally the agreement was to provide for the harmonization of road transport legislation of partner states with the legislation of the Community and for coordination on administrative questions related to road transit. In addition the agreement was to promote combined land transport operations in conformity with Community rules.2. At the outset of the negotiations a multi-lateral agreement was sought, however, it proved impossible to interest all three partner states equally in following such a multi-lateral approach. This led to the decision to conclude separate agreements with each of these partner states. These agreements will terminate automatically upon accession of the relevant Partner State to the European Union.3. Member States participated as observers at all the negotiation sessions with Bulgaria, Hungary and Romania. The Commission also held a number of technical meetings with representatives of these partner states. The negotiation sessions were preceded by discussions with the Member States in the Council. The Commission transmitted copies of the draft agreements, at all stages in their development, to the Council Special Committee established for the purpose of these negotiations, and also held separate meetings with Member States' experts on certain technical aspects of the agreements, such as the actual layout of the authorizations to be exchanged under the agreements.4. On the basis of the negotiating directives adopted by the Council and subsequent discussion in the Special Committee, a draft Agreement with Bulgaria was initialled by the Heads of Delegations on 4 December 1998 and a draft Agreement with Hungary was initialled on 8 April 1999. The draft Agreement with Romania was initialled on 26 October 2000. The wording of all the three agreements is almost identical. In fact variances in the wording of the Agreements do not reflect differences in substance, but rather the editing preferences of the negotiating partners.5. On 10.12.1999 the Commission adopted proposals for Council Decisions concerning the signature and the conclusion of the Agreements between the European Community and the Republic of Hungary and the Republic of Bulgaria respectively. The Agreement with the Republic of Hungary was signed on 12.7.2000, the Agreement with the Republic of Bulgaria was signed on 26.7.2000. It is expected that the Agreements will be concluded before the end of the year 2001.B. Content of AgreementB.1. Authorizations6. The present Agreement with Romania, as well as the almost identical Agreements already signed with Bulgaria and Hungary, facilitate transit through the contracting parties' territories, in particular by the mutual exchange of transit authorizations for road goods transport. These authorizations are additional to those already exchanged under bilateral agreements between individual Member States on the one hand and Romania on the other hand. The provisions of the existing bilateral agreements between Member States and Romania are thus maintained. This means that for example the types of transport operations or vehicle categories for which a particular haulier from an individual Member State needs a transit authorization for Romania continues to be determined by the existing bilateral agreements concluded by the haulier's state of residence and Romania.7. The hauliers of Member States needing a transit authorization for a given return journey through Romania can thus use an authorization exchanged under this Community agreement. Alternatively, a Community haulier may use for example an authorization exchanged under a bilateral agreement between its state of residence and Romania. In the same way Romanian hauliers can use a single Community authorization to transit any number of individual Member States on an individual return journey to and from or through Community territory. Alternatively, they may use, for example, the authorizations exchanged under the relevant bilateral agreements with individual Member States.8. While in principle the Community offers the option of transiting the territory of all its 15 Member States, the partner State offers in exchange only the transit of its own territory, a single state. It is therefore reasonable for the Community to receive a substantially larger number of authorizations from Romania in return. This needs to be qualified, however, by the fact that no Romanian would ever transit, on an individual journey, all 15 Member States. In fact the geographical location of some Member States prevents or makes their transit highly unlikely. In addition, the Community has limited from the outset of the negotiations the number of transit authorizations for each partner State to 7000 authorizations of which not more than 3000 were to be valid in any Member State. Therefore it was perceived as reasonable by the negotiating partners for the Community to receive at least twice as many authorizations.9. As a result of the negotiations, the Community will receive 14000 authorizations per annum from Romania. Each single authorization is valid for one return transit journey. The distribution of these authorizations among Member States, who will be responsible for issuing them to their hauliers, will be the subject of a separate Council Regulation.10. In return Romania will receive from the Community 7000 "blank" authorizations per annum valid for a return transit journey, as well as 3000 adhesive stamps for each Member State. On each "blank" authorization the haulier of Romania will have to validate beforehand the choice of transit route (i.e. the individual Member States transited on a journey) by attaching the adhesive stamp(s) for the relevant Member State(s). The authorization will thus allow the haulier from Romania to transit the Member State(s) whose stamp is affixed to the authorization on both outward and return parts of the journey. This allows for a maximum of flexibility for Romania's hauliers in adjusting the transit route according to individual needs. A haulier from Romania using the Community transit authorization who wishes to load or unload in a Member State will still need a separate authorization for these operations, on the basis of the bilateral agreement concluded between Romania and the Member State in wich loading/unloading takes place.11. All the authorizations and adhesive stamps will be supplied by the services of the Commission to both Member States and Romania, who will issue them to their hauliers at a charge so as only to cover reasonable administrative expenses. The use of the authorization as such will be free of charge. The authorization can only be used by vehicles complying at least with Euro I standards.B.2. Infrastructure charges12. The transport operations carried out in Eastern Europe, in general, have at times been subject to excessive, often discriminatory, fiscal and para-fiscal charges. New charges or increases in charges have frequently been introduced at very short notice without sufficient information or warning for Community hauliers about the exact rules applying.13. In order to avoid these aforementioned difficulties, the agreement sets out a number of specific provisions regarding the type of charges that can be levied on transport operations carried out under the agreement. These provisions contain both the relevant principles and rules of Community acquis. This entails in principle that only non-discriminatory, infrastructure-use-related user charges or tolls may levied, and that transport operations as such may not be subject to special taxes or charges.14. In Eastern Europe, weight and axle-tonne limits for heavy goods vehicles are often substantially lower than those applied in the Community. This is also reflected by the state of the Eastern European infrastructure which has been built to much lower standards. Therefore heavy goods vehicles corresponding to Community norms, for example a vehicle with a maximum authorised weight of 40 tonnes, with a 11.5t drive axle load and a length of 18.75 m, will in general exceed Eastern European authorized limits of weights and dimensions and as consequence be required to pay additional charges reflecting the additional damage caused to the infrastructure.15. It is generally accepted that the predominantly poor technical state of Eastern European infrastructure does not yet allow for a full application of the Community acquis on maximum authorised weights and dimensions for road vehicles in international traffic. However, at present, considerable sums of money, including Community finance, are being devoted to rehabilitating the main roads in the partner states. Therefore the Commission set out to achieve a negotiation result that Community vehicles operating under these three agreements with Hungary, Bulgaria and Romania would not have to pay special charges for being "over-weight" if the vehicles meet Community norms for weights and dimensions while using specific upgraded transit routes through the partner state. Thus charges would be based on the actual technical state of a specific road section which might already allow, for instance, for a 11.5t drive axle load even if the general axle load limit valid for the whole main road network would be still lower. This would lead to substantial savings for Community hauliers since, at present Eastern European states usually charge for vehicles being overweight in relation to the general weight limits set for a whole road network, even if specific sections of that road network have already been upgraded to support the higher Community norms.16. Therefore this agreement with Romania expressly foresees that on certain transit routes in Romania on the route between Greece and the 'rest of the Community' Community vehicles in conformity with Community norms shall not be subject to special 'over-weight' charges. On the upgraded section of these transit routes, indicated in Annex to the agreement, Romania thus exempts vehicles operating under this agreement from special charges for being overweight. As the road network is continuously improved, the agreements allow for the corresponding extension of the list of upgraded roads contained in the annex of the agreement. There are no direct financial consequences on the Community budget as a result of the agreement.B.3. Legislative Harmonization17. The agreement lists a number of pertinent dispositions of the Community acquis regarding the technical standards of vehicles, that will be adopted by Romania, including among other legislation that on braking devices, sound levels and speed limitation devices. A high technical standard of vehicles operating under this agreement is also ensured by the fact that only vehicles complying at least with Euro I standards can use the authorizations.18. In addition the agreement ensures among others that both contracting parties apply equivalent social provisions, as well as implement the relevant legislation concerning the carriage of dangerous goods.B.4. Management of the Agreements19. The Joint Committee instituted by the agreement shall assure the proper implementation of the agreement with a view to ensuring the smooth functioning of road transit.B.5. Combined Transport20. The agreement contains a number of provisions on the promotion of combined transport reflecting the desire of both parties to ensure that their international transport makes increasing use of environmentally friendly modes of transport.21. The relevant provisions of the agreement reflect the Community principle and policies in relation to Combined Transport. The agreement details a number of wide-ranging support measures that shall be taken by the Contracting Parties in order to improve the competitiveness of combined transport.22. A large part of these measures is aimed at encouraging users and consignors to make more frequent use of Combined Transport. These measures include, among others, those designed to improve the speed and reliability of combined transport, to promote the use of unaccompanied combined transport and to consider how to alleviate quota and authorization systems for combined transport users.23. The provisions on Combined Transport also reflect the need to improve existing infrastructure and underline the need to create appropriate infrastructure to ensure the interoperability of the networks.24. The agreement also recognizes that in order to foster the development and promotion of Combined Transport available information concerning new combined actions should be made accessible on request, including that on technology research projects.C. Conclusion25. The Commission considers that the draft agreement is acceptable to the Community. Accordingly, it proposes that the Council:(i) approves the results of the negotiations;(ii) decides to sign the agreement and(iii) initiates the procedure for its conclusion.26. It therefore submits herewith to the Council a proposal for a Council Decision concerning the signature and a Council Decision concerning the conclusion of an Agreement establishing certain conditions for the carriage of goods by road and the promotion of Combined Transport between the European Community and Romania.Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION concerning the signature of the Agreement between the European Community and Romania establishing certain conditions for the carriage of goods by road and the promotion of Combined TransportTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community, and in particular Article 71 in conjunction with the first sentence of Article 300 (2),Having regard to the proposal from the Commission,Whereas it is necessary to authorize the signing of the Agreement between the European Community and Romania establishing certain conditions for the carriage of goods by road and the promotion of Combined Transport on behalf of the Community,HAS DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1The signature, subject to conclusion, of the Agreement between the European Community and Romania in the field of transport is hereby approved on behalf of the Community.Article 2The President of the Council is authorized to designate the person(s) entitled to sign the Agreement on behalf of the Community.Done at Brussels,For the CouncilThe President