CELEX: 62014CN0314
Language: en
Date: 2014-07-01 00:00:00
Title: Case C-314/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 1 July 2014  — Sanoma Media Finland Oy/Nelonen Media, Helsinki

1.9.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 292/21
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein hallinto-oikeus (Finland) lodged on 1 July 2014 — Sanoma Media Finland Oy/Nelonen Media, Helsinki
   (Case C-314/14)
   2014/C 292/25
   Language of the case: Finnish
   
      Referring court
   
   Korkein hallinto-oikeus
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Sanoma Media Finland Oy/Nelonen Media, Helsinki
   
      Other party: Viestintävirasto
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               In circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, is Article 19(1) of Directive 2010/13/EU (1) to be interpreted as precluding an interpretation of national legal provisions to the effect that screen splitting is not regarded as a break bumper that keeps the audiovisual programme distinct from television advertising, where one part of the screen is reserved for the programme’s closing credits and the other part to a schedule menu presenting the upcoming programmes on a broadcaster’s channel and no acoustic or optical device expressly announcing the start of an advertising break is broadcast either in the split screen or thereafter?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Taking into account the fact that Directive 2010/13 is in the nature of a minimum standard, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, is Article 23(2) of that directive to be interpreted as meaning that it is not compatible with that provision to classify sponsor idents broadcast in connection with programmes other than the sponsored programmes as ‘advertising spots’ within the meaning of Article 23(1) of the Directive which must be included in the maximum permissible advertising time?
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Taking into account the fact that Directive 2010/13 is in the nature of a minimum standard, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, is the term ‘advertising spots’ in Article 23(1) of that directive in conjunction with the description of the maximum permissible advertising time (‘the proportion ... within a given clock hour shall not exceed 20 %’) to be interpreted as meaning that it is not compatible with that provision to count the ‘black seconds’ between individual advertising spots and at the end of an advertising break as advertising time?
            
         
      (1)  Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive) (OJ 2010 L 95, p. 1).