CELEX: C2006/326/39
Language: en
Date: 2006-12-30 00:00:00
Title: Case C-102/06: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers in the Member States — Failure to transpose within the prescribed time-limit)

30.12.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 326/20
            
         Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 October 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria
   (Case C-102/06) (1)
   
   (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers in the Member States - Failure to transpose within the prescribed time-limit)
   (2006/C 326/39)
   Language of the case: German
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. O'Reilly and W. Bogensberger, Agents)
   
      Defendant: Republic of Austria (represented by: C. Pesendorfer, Agent)
   Re:
   Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to have adopted, within the prescribed time-limit, all the measures necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers (OJ 2003 L 31, p. 18)
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Declares that, by failing to adopt the the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/9/EC of 27 January 2003 laying down minimum standards for the reception of asylum seekers, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under that directive.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the Republic of Austria is pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 96, 22.04.2006.