CELEX: C2005/057/07
Language: en
Date: 2005-03-05 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 20 January 2005 in Case C-225/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling by the Juzgado de lo Social n° 3 de Orense): Rosa García Blanco v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (Social security of migrant workers — Old age — Unemployment — Minimum periods of insurance — Periods of insurance taken into account for calculating the amount of benefits but not for acquiring the right to those benefits — Periods of unemployment — Aggregation)

5.3.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 57/4
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
   
   (Second Chamber)
   of 20 January 2005
   in Case C-225/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling by the Juzgado de lo Social no 3 de Orense): Rosa García Blanco v Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) (1)
   
   (Social security of migrant workers - Old age - Unemployment - Minimum periods of insurance - Periods of insurance taken into account for calculating the amount of benefits but not for acquiring the right to those benefits - Periods of unemployment - Aggregation)
   (2005/C 57/07)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   In Case C-225/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Juzgado de lo Social no 3 de Orense (Spain), made by decision of 30 March 2002, received at the Court on 17 June 2002, in the proceedings between Rosa García Blanco and Instituto Nacional de la Seguridad Social (INSS), Tesorería General de la Seguridad Social (TGSS) – the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, R. Silva de Lapuerta, R. Schintgen (Rapporteur), P. Kūris and G. Arestis, Judges; J. Kokott, Advocate General, M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 20 January 2005, in which it has ruled:
   There is no need to reply to the reference for a preliminary ruling in Case C-225/02.
   
      (1)  OJ C 191 of 10.08.2002