CELEX: 62013TN0631
Language: en
Date: 2013-11-29 00:00:00
Title: Case T-631/13: Action brought on 29 November 2013 — Raffinerie Heide v Commission

1.2.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 31/16
            
         Action brought on 29 November 2013 — Raffinerie Heide v Commission
   (Case T-631/13)
   2014/C 31/28
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Raffinerie Heide GmbH (Hemmingstedt, Germany) (represented by: U. Karpenstein, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul Commission Decision of 5 September 2013 concerning national implementation measures for the transitional free allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances in accordance with Article 11(3) of Directive 2003/87/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council (2013/448/EU, OJ 2013 L 240, p. 27), in so far as Article 1(1) and Annex IA rejected inclusion of the applicant in the list under Article 11 of Directive 2003/87/EC and the preliminary total annual amounts of emission allowances which should be allocated to the applicant under identifier DE000000000000010 free of charge;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Commission to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
   
               1.
            
            
               First plea in law, alleging failure to exercise discretion
               In this context the applicant claims that the Union’s greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme for the third trading period (2013 to 2020) does not exclude allocations in particular cases of hardship and does not release the Commission, in its decisions, from having regard to the fundamental rights of undertakings and the principle of proportionality. The Commission has overlooked this and thereby did not properly exercise its discretion which Union law has granted it.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the applicant’s fundamental rights
               The applicant submits in that regard that the rejection by the national competent authority of the requested allocations infringes the applicant’s fundamental rights under Articles 17 and 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union as well as the principle of proportionality. The expected under-supply of allowances to the applicant would cause it clear disproportionate hardship unforeseen by Directive 2003/87/EC. The creation of a situation likely to endanger the existence of undertakings, such as the applicant, is not appropriate, necessary or proportionate to meet the objectives set out in the directive.
            
         
      (1)  Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32).