CELEX: 62008CB0552
Language: en
Date: 2009-10-01 00:00:00
Title: Case C-552/08P P: Order of the Court of 1 October 2009 — Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Customs Code — Article 220(2)(b) — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Waiver of subsequent entry in the accounts of import duties — Notice to importers — Good faith)

16.1.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 11/11
            
         Order of the Court of 1 October 2009 — Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH v Commission of the European Communities
   (Case C-552/08P P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Customs Code - Article 220(2)(b) - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Waiver of subsequent entry in the accounts of import duties - Notice to importers - Good faith)
   2010/C 11/19
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH (represented by: O. Wenzlaff, Rechtsanwält)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: S. Schønberg, agent and B. Wägenbaur, Rechtsanwält)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal brought against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Eighth Chamber) of 8 October 2008 in Case T-51/07 Agrar-Invest-Tatschl v Commission, by which the Court dismissed the action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C (2006) 5789 final of 4 December 2006 finding that post-clearance recovery of a part of the import duty not demanded from the applicant in respect of the import of sugar from Croatia should be effected — Good faith of the person liable to duty precluded if the Commission has published a notice to importers — Incorrect assessment of the effect which the subsequent confirmation of the authenticity and accuracy of the certificates of origin by the customs authorities of the State of export has on the criterion of good faith
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the appeal.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Agrar-Invest-Tatschl GmbH to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.