CELEX: C2004/239/41
Language: en
Date: 2004-09-25 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 June 2004 in Case T-281/02: Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Word mark ‘Mehr für Ihr Geld’ — Absolute grounds for refusal — Distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

25.9.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 239/20
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 30 June 2004
   in Case T-281/02: Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb GmbH & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Word mark ‘Mehr für Ihr Geld’ - Absolute grounds for refusal - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2004/C 239/41)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case T-281/02: Norma Lebensmittelfilialbetrieb GmbH & Co. KG, established in Nuremberg (Germany), represented by S. Rojahn and S. Freytag, lawyers, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM), (Agent: D. Schennen) — action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 3 July 2002 (Case R 239/2002-3) concerning the registration of the word mark ‘Mehr für Ihr Geld’ as a Community trade mark — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, V. Tiili and M. Vilaras, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 30 June 2004, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the application;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 274 of 9.11.2002.