CELEX: C1997/295/42
Language: en
Date: 1997-09-27 00:00:00
Title: Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Divisional Court, Queen's Bench Division, by order of that court of 17 June 1997, in the case of The Queen against (1) Secretary of State for the Environment (2) Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, ex parte: (1) H. A. Standley and Others (2) D. G. D. Metson and Others, Intervener: National Farmers' Union (Case C-293/97)

C 295/24               EN                 Official Journal of the European Communities                                     27 . 9 . 97
     may be accepted that the act by which the President                   who — for reasons outside their control — have not
     appoints a doctor to represent the applicant on the                   delivered milk throughout the necessary qualification
     Committee is itself an administrative act, the acts                   period for the award of quota (1 March 1994 to
     which precede it or directly follow from it must                      1 January 1995 ) are refused a quota ?
     involve full consultation of the other party.
     Consequently, the Commission was under an
     obligation to inform the applicant of its decision to           (') OJ L 405 , 31 . 12 . 1992, p . 40.
     refer the matter to the President of the Court of
     Justice. Once that appointment had taken place, the
     Commission was also obliged to communicate a copy
     of the appointment order made by the President of the
     Court of Justice.
— Infringement of the first paragraph of Article 9 of                Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Divisional
     Annex II to the Staff Regulations of Officials: the             Court, Queen's Bench Division, by order of that court of
     Court of First Instance wrongly considered that the             17 June 1997, in the case of The Queen against
     applicant was in a position to exercise the rights              ( 1 ) Secretary of State for the Environment (2 ) Minister of
     conferred on her by that provision.                             Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, ex parte: ( 1 ) H. A.
                                                                     Standley and Others (2 ) D. G. D. Metson and Others,
                                                                                   Intervener: National Farmers ' Union
                                                                                                ( Case C-293/97 )
                                                                                                  ( 97/C 295/42 )
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Regeringsratt
by order of that court of 23 July 1997 in the case brought
    by Kjell Karlsson and Others against Jordbruksverket
                                                                     Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
                         (Case C-292/97)                             European Communities by an order of the Divisional
                          ( 97/C 295/41 )                            Court, Queen's Bench Division, of 17 June 1997, which
                                                                     was received at the Court Registry on 11 August 1997, for
                                                                     a preliminary ruling in the case of The Queen against
Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the               ( 1 ) Secretary of State for the Environment ( 2 ) Minister of
European Communities by order of the Regeringsratt                   Agriculture, Fisheries & Food, ex parte: ( 1 ) H. A.
(Supreme Administrative Court) of 23 July 1997, which                Standley and Others ( 2 ) D. G. D. Metson and Others,
was received at the Court Registry on 8 August 1997, for             Intervener: National Farmers' Union, on the following
a preliminary ruling in the case brought by Kjell Karlsson           questions:
and Others against Jordbruksverket on the following
questions:
                                                                      1 . Does Council Directive 91 /676/EEC (*) of 12 December
Do Council Regulation ( EEC) No 3950/92 of 28 December                      1991 concerning the protection of waters against
1992 establishing an additional levy in the milk and milk                  pollution caused by nitrates from agricultural sources
products sector ('), Articles 5 and 40 ( 3 ) of the EC Treaty              ('the Nitrates Directive') require Member States, in
and the fundamental Community law principle of equal                       accordance, in particular, with Articles 2 (j ) and 3 ( 1 )
treatment permit national provisions of a State which                      and Annex I thereof, to identify surface freshwaters as
acceded to the Union on 1 January 1995 under which:                        'waters affected by pollution', and then to designate as
                                                                           vulnerable zones in accordance with Article 3 (2 )
                                                                           thereof all known areas of land which drain into such
1 . for producers who have not altered their production,                   waters and which contribute to pollution:
      average deliveries in 1991 , 1992 and 1993 are adopted
      as the basis for the award of a milk quota,
                                                                            (i)  where those waters contain a concentration of
2. producers who have commenced or increased                                     nitrates in excess of 50 mg/1 ( being the
      production of milk between 1 January 1991 and                              concentration of nitrates laid down by Annex I to
      31 December 1994 must accept a reduction in milk                           the Nitrates Directive, by reference to Directive
      quota, unlike milk producers whose production                              75/440/EEC (2) and the Member State is satisfied
      circumstances have not altered in that period and                          that the discharge of nitrogen compounds
      producers of ecologically produced milk, and that                          from agricultural sources makes a 'significant
                                                                                 contribution' to this overall concentration of
      reduction is determined differently for producers who
      have commenced production than for those who have                          nitrates and, if so, is a Member State entitled to
                                                                                 be so satisfied if it has reason to believe that the
      increased production,
                                                                                 contribution to this overall concentration of
                                                                                 nitrates, of nitrogen compounds discharged from
 3 . producers who delivered milk before the State's                             agricultural sources, is greater than de minimis or
      accession to the Community's milk quota system but                         some other amount or degree of contribution,
 ---pagebreak--- 27 . 9 . 97                EN                   Official Journal of the European Communities                                    C 295/25
               and if the latter, what amount or degree                    Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di
               of contribution amounts to a 'significant                   Genova by order of 29 July 1997 in the case of Industrie
               contribution' for these purposes; or                        Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio v.
                                                                           ( 1 ) International Factors Italia SpA — Uhi 1ALIA;
       ( ii ) only where the discharge of nitrogen compounds               (2 ) Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH (Wessling — Germany); and
               from agricultural sources itself accounts for a                                 (3 ) Ministero della Difesa
               concentration of nitrates in those waters in excess                                   ( Case C-295/97)
               of 50 mg/1 ( i.e. leaving out of account any
               contribution from other sources); or                                                      97/C 295/44 )
       ( iii ) on some other basis and, if so, what basis ?                Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
                                                                           European Communities by order of 29 July 1997 from the
2. If Question 1 is answered otherwise than in sense ( ii )                Tribunale di Genova ( District Court, Genoa), Sixth Civil
       above, is the Nitrates Directive invalid (to the extent             Chamber, which was received at the Court Registry on
       of its application to surface freshwaters ) on the                  11 August 1997, for a preliminary ruling in the case of
       grounds that it infringes:                                          Industrie Aeronautiche e Meccaniche Rinaldo Piaggio v.
                                                                           ( 1 ) International Factors Italia SpA — IFITALIA;
                                                                           (2 ) Dornier Luftfahrt GmbH (Wessling — Germany); and
       (i)     the principle that the polluter should pay; and/or          ( 3 ) Ministero della Difesa on the following questions:
       ( ii ) the principle of proportionality; and/or
                                                                           1 . Can a national court request the Court of Justice of
                                                                                 the European Communities to rule directly on whether
       (iii ) the fundamental property rights of those owning                    a legislative provision of a Member State is compatible
               and/or farming land draining into surface
                                                                                 with the provisions of Article 92 of the Treaty ( State
               freshwaters required to be identified under                       aid)?
               Article 3 ( 1 ), being areas of land which are then
               designated by Member States as vulnerable zones
               under Article 3 ( 2 )?                                      2 . If the answer is in the affirmative: can it be argued
                                                                                 that, by Law No 26 of 3 April 1979 establishing
(•) OJ L 375 , 31 . 12 . 1991 , p. 1 .                                           a special administration procedure for large
( 2 ) Council Directive of 16 June 1975 concerning the quality                   undertakings in a state of crisis, and in particular by
      required of surface water intended for the abstraction of                  the provisions of that Law set out in the grounds of
      drinking water in the Member States ( OJ L 194, 25 . 7. 1995,              the present order, the Italian State has granted to such
      p. 26 ).                                                                   undertakings as are covered by that Law (that is to
                                                                                 say, large undertakings ) aid contrary to Article 92 of
                                                                                 the Treaty ?
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht
Munster by order of that court of 28 July 1997 in the case
of Eurowings Luftverkehrs AG v. Finanzamt Dortmund­                                   Removal from the register of C-407/95 (*)
                                     Unna
                                                                                                         97/C 295/45 )
                              ( Case C-294/97
                                ( 97/C 295/43 )                             By order of 13 May 1997 the President of the Court of
                                                                           Justice of the European Communities has ordered the
                                                                            removal from the register of Case C-407/95: Kingdom of
Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the                      Belgium v. Commission of the European Communities,
European Communities by an order of the Finanzgericht                       supported by French Republic and United Kingdom of
 (Finance Court), Munster (Ninth Chamber), of 28 July                       Great Britain and Northern Ireland .
 1997, which was received at the Court Registry on
 11 August 1997, for a preliminary ruling in the case of                    O OJ C 46, 17. 2 . 1996 .
Eurowings Luftverkehrs AG v. Finanzamt (Tax Office),
Dortmund-Unna, on the following question:
 Are the 'add-back' provisions in the second sentence of
 paragraph 8 ( 7) and the second sentence of paragraph 12
 (2 ) (2 ) of the Gewerbesteuergesetz ( Business Tax Law)                              Removal from the register of C-58/96 (')
 compatible with the principle of freedom to provide
 services under Article 59 of the Treaty on European Union                                              ( 97/C 295/46 )
 of 7 February 1992 ?
                                                                            By order of 13 May 1997 the President of the Court of
                                                                            Justice of the European Communities has ordered the