CELEX: 62013TA0026
Language: en
Date: 2014-02-12 00:00:00
Title: Case T-26/13: Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2014 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — Semtee (CALDEA) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark CALDEA — Earlier international word mark BALEA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

29.3.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 93/23
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 12 February 2014 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — Semtee (CALDEA)
   (Case T-26/13) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark CALDEA - Earlier international word mark BALEA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity between the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2014/C 93/39
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: O. Bludovsky, B. Beinert and A. Bender, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Semtee (Escaldes Engordany, Andorra)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 October 2012 (Case R 2432/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG and Semtee.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.