CELEX: 62018TA0658
Language: en
Date: 2019-12-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-658/18: Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2019 — Hästens Sängar v EUIPO (Representation of a chequered gingham pattern) (EU trade mark — International registration designating the European Union — Figurative mark representing a chequered gingham pattern — Absolute grounds for refusal — No distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

27.1.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 27/31
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 3 December 2019 — Hästens Sängar v EUIPO (Representation of a chequered gingham pattern)
      (Case T-658/18) (1)
      
      (EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark representing a chequered gingham pattern - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
      (2020/C 27/38)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Hästens Sängar AB (Köping, Sweden) (represented by: M. Johansson and R. Wessman, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, H. O’Neill and D. Gája, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 August 2018 (Case R 442/2018-2) concerning the international registration designating the European Union of a figurative mark representing a chequered gingham pattern.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     Dismisses the action;
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     Orders Hästens Sängar AB to pay the costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.