CELEX: C2002/156/37
Language: en
Date: 2002-06-29 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 January 2002 in Cases T-212/00: Nuove Industrie Molisane Srl v Commission of the European Communities (State Aid — Decision declaring aid compatible with the common market — Action for annulment — Recipient company — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

C 156/20               EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                       29.6.2002
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                   JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                       of 30 January 2002                                                           of 5 March 2002
in Cases T-212/00: Nuove Industrie Molisane Srl v Com-                    in Case T-241/00: Azienda Agricola ‘Le Canne’ Srl against
           mission of the European Communities (1)                               Commission of the European Communities (1)
(State Aid — Decision declaring aid compatible with the                   (Agriculture — Reduction of Community financial assist-
common market — Action for annulment — Recipient                                        ance — Obligation to state reasons)
company — Legal interest in bringing proceedings —
                          Inadmissibility)
                                                                                                    (2002/C 156/38)
                         (2002/C 156/37)
                                                                                              (Language of the case: Italian)
                   (Language of the case: Italian)
                                                                          In Case T-241/00: Azienda Agricola ‘Le Canne’ Srl, established
                                                                          in Porto Viro (Italy), represented by G. Carraro, F. Mazzonetto
In Case T-212/00, Nuove Industrie Molisane Srl, established in            and G. Arendt, lawyers, with an address for service in
Sesto Campano (Italy), represented by I. Van Bael and F. Di               Luxembourg, against Commission of the European Communi-
Gianni, lawyers, v Commission of the European Communities                 ties (Agents: E. de March, L. Visaggio and A. Dal Ferro) —
(Agents: V. Di Bucci, A. Abate and G.B. Conte): Application               application, first, for annulment of Commission Decision
for the partial annulment of Commission Decision SG(2000)D/               C (2000) 1754 of 11 July 2000 reducing the assistance granted
103923 of 30 May 2000 authorising State aid amounting to                  to the applicant in respect of project I/16/90/02, and second,
LIT 29176,69 million in favour of Nuove Industrie Molisane                for damages — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber),
in order to carry out investment at Sesto Campano (Molise,                composed of B. Vesterdor, President, N. Forwood and H. Legal,
Italy), the Court of First Instance of the European Communities           Judges; J. Palacio González, Administrator, for the Registrar,
(First Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of: B. Ves-               has given a judgment on 5 March 2002, in which it:
terdorf, President, M. Vilaras, J. Pirrung, A.W.H. Meij and
N.J. Forwood, Judges; J. Palacio González, Administrator, for
the Registrar, has given a judgment on 30 January 2002, in
which it:                                                                 1.    Annuls Decision C (2000) 1754 of 11 July 2000;
                                                                          2.    Dismisses the remainder of the appeal;
1.    Dismisses the application as inadmissible;
                                                                          3.    Orders the Commission to pay the costs, including those of the
2.    Orders the applicant to pay the costs.                                    application for interim relief.
(1) OJ C 302 of 21.10.2000.                                               (1) OJ C 355 of 9.12.2000.