CELEX: C2004/284/43
Language: en
Date: 2004-11-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-357/04: Action brought on 31 August 2004 by Marguerite Chetcuti against Commission of the European Communities

20.11.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 284/21
            
         Action brought on 31 August 2004 by Marguerite Chetcuti against Commission of the European Communities
   (Case T-357/04)
   (2004/C 284/43)
   Language of the case: French
   An action against the Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities on 31 August 2004 by Marguerite Chetcuti, residing in Zejtun (Malta), represented by Marc-Albert Lucas, lawyer.
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Declare unlawful point III of competition notice COM/P A/04 of 6 April 2004;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of 22 June 2004 of the competition selection board rejecting her candidature in reliance on that provision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Annul the subsequent acts of the competition procedure, which are unlawful as a consequence of the unlawfulness of the competition notice and of the contested decision, in particular:
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           the list adopted by the selection board of candidates meeting the conditions fixed by the notice of competition,
                        
                     
                           —
                        
                        
                           the Commission decision determining on that basis the number of posts to be filled,
                        
                     
                           —
                        
                        
                           the list of suitable candidates adopted by the selection board on completion of its task, and
                        
                     
                           —
                        
                        
                           the appointment decisions taken by the appointing authority on that basis;
                        
                     
         
               —
            
            
               Order the Commission to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments:
   In support of the form of order sought, the applicant claims that the notice of competition infringes Articles 4, 27 and 29(1)(b) of the Staff Regulations and also the principle of equal treatment in that excludes members of the auxiliary staff from the competition. She also claims that the notice infringes Articles 27 and 29 of the Staff Regulations and is contrary to the interests of the service and the principle of equal treatment on the ground that it requires a period of service as an official, temporary servant or member of the temporary staff and thus excludes local staff, like the applicant.