CELEX: 62015TA0450
Language: en
Date: 2016-09-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-450/15: Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2016 — Satkirit Holdings v EUIPO — Advanced Mailing Solutions (luvoworld) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU word mark luvoworld — Earlier EU work mark luvo — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the goods and services — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

7.11.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 410/17
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 27 September 2016 — Satkirit Holdings v EUIPO — Advanced Mailing Solutions (luvoworld)
   (Case T-450/15) (1)
   
   ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark luvoworld - Earlier EU work mark luvo - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   (2016/C 410/22)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Satkirit Holdings Ltd (Douglas, Isle of Man) (represented by: M. Vanhegan, Barrister)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Sliwinska and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Advanced Mailing Solutions Ltd (East Kilbride, United Kingdom)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 May 2015 (Case R 1480/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Advanced Mailing Solutions and Satkirit Holdings.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Satkirit Holdings Ltd to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.