CELEX: 52012PC0420
Language: en
Date: 2012-07-25
Title: Amended proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on criminal sanctions for insider dealing and market manipulation (submitted in accordance with Article 293(2) TFEU)

|
			
		
		
		52012PC0420
		
			Amended proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on criminal sanctions for insider dealing and market manipulation (submitted in accordance with Article 293(2) TFEU) /* COM/2012/0420 final - 2011/0297 (COD) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
On 20 October 2011, the Commission adopted
a proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on criminal
sanctions for insider dealing and market manipulation. This proposal was
forwarded to the European Parliament and the Council on 20 October 2011. The
Economic and Social Committee gave its opinion on 28 March 2012. 
Since March 2011, investigations have been
taking place in relation to possible manipulation of the EURIBOR and LIBOR
benchmarks for interbank lending rates by a number of banks. It was suspected
that banks had provided estimates of the interest rate at which they would
accept offers of funding which were different from the rate they would have
accepted in practice. As a result, the level of EURIBOR and LIBOR rates, which
are used as a benchmark for borrowing and as a reference for the pricing of
many financial instruments, such as interest rate swaps, may have been altered
and the integrity of EURIBOR or LIBOR may have been called into question. Furthermore,
the individual contributor banks' estimates provided misleading information to
the market about their likely costs of funding.
The Commission has assessed whether the possible
manipulation of benchmarks including LIBOR and EURIBOR would be covered by its
proposal for a Regulation on insider dealing and market manipulation and the
related proposal for a Directive on criminal sanctions for insider dealing and
market manipulation, adopted in October 2011. In particular the European
Parliament has also emphasised the importance of this matter. Given that
benchmarks are not currently covered by either proposal, the Commission has
concluded that direct manipulation of benchmarks does not fall within the scope
of either proposal. 
While it may be difficult or impossible for
a competent authority to prove that manipulation of a benchmark had an effect
on the price of related financial instruments, any actual or attempted
manipulation of important benchmarks can have a serious impact on market confidence
and could result in significant losses for investors and distortions of the
real economy, given the wide use of benchmark indexes as a reference rate e.g.
for interest swaps and variable rate mortgages. It is therefore essential to
clarify that competent authorities should be able to impose administrative
sanctions as regards the offence of market manipulation in these cases, without
the need to prove or demonstrate incidental issues such as price effects. It is
also essential that all necessary steps are taken to prevent such manipulation
and to enable and facilitate the work of competent authorities in imposing
sanctions. A stringent legal framework will act as a credible deterrent for this
kind of behaviour, thereby protecting investors and restoring market
confidence. These regulatory steps should include criminal sanctions.
Therefore, in order to cover the manipulation
of benchmarks and in order to ensure that intentional manipulation of
benchmarks is a criminal offence, the Commission proposes to amend its proposal
for a Directive.
2.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL
2.1.        Legal basis
The amended proposal is based on Article 83(2)
TFEU and submitted in accordance with Article 293(2) TFEU.
2.2.        Subsidiarity and
proportionality
According to the principle of subsidiarity
(Article 5(3) TEU), action at Union level should be taken only when the aims
envisaged cannot be achieved sufficiently by Member States alone and can
therefore, by reason of the scale or effects of the proposed action, be better
achieved by the Union. The cross-border dimension of many benchmarks and the
entities that contribute data to these benchmarks, as well as of the
international character of many of the financial instruments which can be
affected by any manipulation of benchmarks, means that there is a real risk that
responses to manipulation of benchmarks at a national level would be
circumvented or ineffective in the absence of action at Union level. Against
this background Union action appears appropriate in terms of the principle of
subsidiarity.
The principle of proportionality requires
that any intervention is targeted and does not go beyond what is necessary to
achieve the objectives. This principle has guided the drafting of this
proposal.
2.3.        Detailed explanation of
the proposal
The changes to the proposal for a Directive
on criminal sanctions for insider dealing and market manipulation which are
required are as follows:
·                        
Amendment to the definitions (Article 2) to
include a definition of benchmarks; 
·                        
Amendment of the offence of market manipulation
(Article 4) to capture manipulation of benchmarks themselves; 
·                        
Amendment of the offence of "inciting,
aiding and abetting and attempt" (Article 5) to include these behaviours
in relation to the manipulation of benchmarks. 
3.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATIONS 
The amended proposal has no implications
for the budget of the Union.
The Commission proposal for a Directive on
criminal sanctions for insider dealing and market manipulation, COM(2011) 654
final, is amended as follows: 
1.           In Article 2, the
following point 3 is added: 
“3. 'Benchmark' means any commercial
index or published figure calculated by the application of a formula to the
value of one or more underlying assets or prices, including estimated prices,
interest rates or other values, or surveys by reference to which the amount
payable under a financial instrument is determined.” 
2.           In Article 4, the
following point (e) is added: 
“(e) transmitting false or misleading
information, providing false or misleading inputs, or any other equivalent
activity which intentionally manipulates the calculation of a benchmark.” 
3.           Article 5(2) is replaced
by the following: 
“2. Member States shall take the necessary
measures to ensure that the attempt to commit any of the offences referred to
in Article 3(a) and Article 4(a), (b)and, (c) and
(e) is punishable as a criminal offence.” 
2011/0297 (COD)
Amended proposal for a
DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL
on criminal sanctions for insider dealing
and market manipulation
(submitted in accordance with Article
293(2) TFEU)
Done at Brussels,
For the European Parliament                       For
the Council
The President                                                 The
President