CELEX: 62018CB0834
Language: en
Date: 2019-04-10 00:00:00
Title: C-834/18: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Faro, Juízo do Trabalho de Portimão — Juiz 1– Portugal) — Rolibérica Lda v Autoridade para as Condições do Trabalho (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Road transport — Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 — Article 4(i) — Concept of ‘week’ — Weekly rest periods — Calculation methods)

19.8.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 280/13
            
         
      Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 10 April 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Faro, Juízo do Trabalho de Portimão — Juiz 1– Portugal) — Rolibérica Lda v Autoridade para as Condições do Trabalho
      (C-834/18) (1)
      
      (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Road transport - Regulation (EC) No 561/2006 - Article 4(i) - Concept of ‘week’ - Weekly rest periods - Calculation methods)
      (2019/C 280/16)
      Language of the case: Portuguese
      
         Referring court
      
      Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Faro, Juízo do Trabalho de Portimão — Juiz 1
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Rolibérica Lda
      
         Defendant: Autoridade para as Condições do Trabalho
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      Regulation (EC) No 561/2006, of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006, on the harmonisation of certain social legislation relating to road transport and amending Council Regulations (EEC) No 3821/85 and (EC) No 2135/98 and repealing Council Regulation (EEC) No 3820/85, must be interpreted as meaning that ‘weekly rest period’, within the meaning of Article 8 of that regulation must not necessarily end in the course of the ‘week’, as defined in Article 4(i) of that regulation.
      
         (1)  OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.