CELEX: 62008TA0331
Language: en
Date: 2010-01-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-331/08: Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2010 — REWE Zentral v OHIM — Grupo Corporativo Teype (Solfrutta) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Solfrutta — Earlier Community word mark FRUTISOL — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Partial refusal of registration — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

13.3.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 63/47
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 27 January 2010 — REWE Zentral v OHIM — Grupo Corporativo Teype (Solfrutta)
   (Case T-331/08) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Solfrutta - Earlier Community word mark FRUTISOL - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Partial refusal of registration - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   2010/C 63/82
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: REWE Zentral AG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Kinkeldey and A. Bognár, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Grupo Corporativo Teype, SL (Madrid, Spain)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 (Case R 1679/2007-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Grupo Corporativo Teype, SL and REWE-Zentral AG.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 May 2008 (Case R 1679/2007-2);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 260 of 11.10.2008.