CELEX: 62012TA0349
Language: en
Date: 2013-09-06 00:00:00
Title: Case T-349/12: Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2013 — Leiner v OHIM — Recaro (REVARO) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark REVARO — Earlier international word mark RECARO — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

19.10.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 304/19
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 6 September 2013 — Leiner v OHIM — Recaro (REVARO)
   (Case T-349/12) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark REVARO - Earlier international word mark RECARO - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2013/C 304/33
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Rudolf Leiner GmbH (Sankt Pölten, Austria) (represented by: W. Emberger, I. Rudnay and L. Emberger, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Recaro Holding GmbH, formerly Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: J. Weiser, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 May 2012 (Case R 482/2011-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Recaro Beteiligungs-GmbH and Rudolf Leiner GmbH.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Rudolf Leiner GmbH to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 287, 22.9.2012.