CELEX: 62017TN0224
Language: en
Date: 2017-04-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-224/17: Action brought on 19 April 2017 — Adapta Color v EUIPO — Coatings Foreign IP (Bio proof ADAPTA)

26.6.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 202/22
            
         Action brought on 19 April 2017 — Adapta Color v EUIPO — Coatings Foreign IP (Bio proof ADAPTA)
   (Case T-224/17)
   (2017/C 202/37)
   Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Adapta Color, SL (Peniscola, Spain) (represented by: G. Macías Bonilla, G. Marín Raigal and E. Armero Lavie, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Coatings Foreign IP Co. LLC (Wilmington, Delaware, United States)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Bio proof ADAPTA’ — European Union trade mark No 4 368 239
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 February 2017 in Case R 2521/2015-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               uphold the present action in its entirety;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant and, where appropriate, the intervener, to pay the costs of the present proceedings, as well as the costs incurred in the proceedings for a declaration of invalidity and the subsequent appeal proceedings before EUIPO.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those put forward in Case T-223/17.