CELEX: C1995/189/06
Language: en
Date: 1995-07-22 00:00:00
Title: JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber) of 1 June 1995 in Case C-42/94: Heidemij Advies BV v. European Parliament (Article 181 of the EC Treaty - Arbitration clause - Extension of the European Parliament in Brussels - Unilateral termination by the European Parliament of the contract for services - Claim for damages by the contractor)

22 . 7. 95             EN                Official Journal of the European Communities                               No C 189/3
Regulation ( EEC ) No 3618/86 of 24 November 1986 ,                 No 3734/87 of 8 December 1987, (EEC) No 1779/88 of
amending Regulation ( EEC ) No 3331/85 amending                     9 June 1988, (EEC) No 3696/88 of 18 November 1988,
Regulation ( EEC ) No 950/68 on the Common Customs                  (EEC) No 1656/89 of29 May 1989 and (EEC) No 3393/89
Tariff ( 2 ), the Court (Third Chamber ), composed of: C.           of 16 October 1989, temporarily suspending the
Gulmann ( Rapporteur ), President of the Chamber, J. C.             autonomous Common Customs Tariff duty on certain
Moitinho de Almeida and J. -P. Puissochet, Judges; G.               industrial products, must be intepreted as meaning that the
Cosmas, Advocate-General; H. von Holstein, Deputy                   description of the product ex tariff heading 85.21 D II and
Registrar, gave a judgment on 1 June 1995 , the operative           subsequently ex 8542 1 1 99, defined as an analog-to-digital
part of which is as follows :                                       converter contained in a housing the exterior dimensions of
                                                                    which do not exceed 18 x 10 mm, also covers converters
the Common Customs Tariff as amended by Council                     contained in circular housings the diameter of which does
Regulation (EEC) No 3618/86 of 24 November 1986,                    not exceed 1 0 mm .
amending Regulation (EEC) No 3331 /85 amending
Regulation (EEC) No 950/68 on the Common Customs                     !) OJ No C 43 , 12 . 2 . 1994 .
Tariff, must be interpreted to the effect that a sterile powder      2) OJ No L 362 , 20 . 12 . 1986 , p . 1 .
made up of amino acids mixed in precise proportions and              3) OJ  No L 177,  1 . 7 . 1987, p . 1 .
used for the preparation of infusion solutions falls under           4) OJ  No L 358 , 19 . 12 . 1987, p . 1 .
                                                                     5) OJ  No L 164 , 30 . 6 . 1988 , p . 1 .
heading 30.03 (subheading 30.03 A II (b)).                           6) OJ  No L 329 , 1 . 12 . 1988 , p . 1 .
                                                                     7) OJ  No L 167,  16 . 6 . 1989 , p . 1 .
H OJ No C 43 , 12 . 2 . 1994 .                                       8) OJ  No L 332 , 16 . 11 . 1989 , p . 1 .
(2 ) OJ No L 345 , 8 . 12 . 1986, p. 1 .
                                                                                  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                                              (Third Chamber)
                        (Third Chamber)
                                                                                               of 1 June 1995
                          of 1 June 1995
                                                                        in Case C-42/94 : Heidemij Advies BV v. European
in Case C-467/93 (reference for a preliminary ruling from                                       Parliament (M
the Bundesfinanzhof): Hauptzollamt Munchen-West v.
                    Analog Devices GmbH (*)                         (Article 181 of the EC Treaty — Arbitration clause —
                                                                    Extension of the European Parliament in Brussels —
(Common Customs Tariff — Suspension of duties —                     Unilateral termination by the European Parliament of the
analog-to-digital converters for the calculation of the             contract for services — Claim for damages by the
              average value of variable wave-forms)                                                contractor)
                           ( 95/C 189/05
                                                                                                ( 95/C 189/06 )
                 (Language of the case: German)
                                                                                   (Language of the case: French)
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
          published in the European Court Reports)                  (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
                                                                             published in the European Court Reports)
In Case C-467/93 : reference to the Court under Article 177
                                                                    In Case C-42/94 : Heidemij Advies BV ( Lawyer: Vera Van
of the EC Treaty by the Bundesfinanzhof ( Federal Finance
Court) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending          Houtte ) v. European Parliament (Agent: François Vainker )
before that court between Hauptzollamt Miinchen-West                — application for damages for unilateral termination of a
                                                                    contract for services — the Court (Third Chamber ),
and Analog Devices GmbH on the interpretation of Council
Regulations ( EEC ) No 3841 /86 of 8 December 1986 ( 2),            composed of: C. Gulmann, President of the Chamber, J. C.
( EEC ) No 1828/87 of 15 June 1987 ( 3 ), ( EEC ) No 3734/87        Moitinho de Almeida and J. -P. Puissochet ( Rapporteur ),
of 8 December 1987 (4 ), ( EEC ) No 1779/88 of 9 June               Judges; P. Léger, Advocate-General; R. Grass, Registrar, has
1988 ( 5), ( EEC ) No 3696/88 of 18 November 1988 ( 6 ),            given a judgment on 1 June 1995 , in which it:
( EEC ) No 1656/89 of 29 May 1989 ( 7) and ( EEC )
No 3393/89 of 16 October 1989 ( 8 ), temporarily                    1 , orders the defendant to pay the applicant the sum of
suspending the autonomous Common Customs Tariff duty                     ECU 20 883,33 together with default interest at the rate
on certain industrial products — the Court (Third                        of 8% as from 1 5 September 1 993;
Chamber ), composed of: C. Gulman (President of
Chamber ), J. C. Moitinho de Almeida and J. -P. Puissochet          2 , dismisses the remainder of the application;
( Rapporteur ), Judges; G. Tesauro, Advocate-General; R.
Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 1 June 1 995 , in         3 , orders the defendant to pay the costs.
which it rules :
                                                                    0 ) OJ No C 90 , 26 . 3 . 1994 .
Council Regulations (EEC) No 3841 /86 of 8 December
1986, (EEC) No 1828/87 of 15 June 1987, (EEC)