CELEX: C2005/115/36
Language: en
Date: 2005-05-14 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 8 March 2005 in Case T-275/02 D v European Investment Bank (EIB) (Agents of the EIB — Action for annulment — Admissibility — Extension of the probationary period — Termination of contract — Conditions — Action for compensation)

14.5.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 115/19
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 8 March 2005
   in Case T-275/02 D v European Investment Bank (EIB) (1)
   
   (Agents of the EIB - Action for annulment - Admissibility - Extension of the probationary period - Termination of contract - Conditions - Action for compensation)
   (2005/C 115/36)
   Language of the case: French
   In Case T-275/02: D, a former agent of the European Investment Bank, residing in Luxembourg (Luxembourg), represented by J. Choucroun, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against European Investment Bank (EIB) (Agent: J.-P. Minnaert, assisted by P. Mousel, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the decisions of the EIB extending the applicant's probationary period and terminating his contract, and application for compensation in respect of the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, F. Dehousse and D. Šváby, Judges; C. Kristensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 8 March 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Declares that it is unnecessary to rule on the request for confidentiality of the European Investment Bank;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the parties to bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 261 of 26.10.2002.