CELEX: 62016TA0202
Language: en
Date: 2017-10-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-202/16: Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2017 — Keturi kambariai v EUIPO — Coffee In (coffee inn) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark coffee inn — Earlier national figurative mark coffee in — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))

201711170521556122017/C 412/362022016TC41220171204EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20171024252622Case T-202/16: Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2017 — Keturi kambariai v EUIPO — Coffee In (coffee inn) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark coffee inn — Earlier national figurative mark coffee in — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))
 ---documentbreak--- C4122017EN2520120171024EN0036252262Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2017 — Keturi kambariai v EUIPO — Coffee In (coffee inn)
   (Case T-202/16) (
         1
      )
   ‛(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark coffee inn — Earlier national figurative mark coffee in — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) of Regulation 2017/1001))’2017/C 412/36Language of the case: English
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: UAB Keturi kambariai (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: R. Pumputienė, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: OÜ Coffee In (Tallinn, Estonia) (represented by: P. Lätt, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2016 (Case R 137/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Coffee In and Keturi kambariai.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
            1.
         
         
            Dismisses the appeal;
         
      
            2.
         
         
            Orders UAB Keturi kambariai to pay the costs.
         
      (
         1
      )	OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.