CELEX: 62009TA0108
Language: en
Date: 2010-05-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-108/09: Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Ravensburger v OHIM — Educa Borras (MEMORY) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark MEMORY — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 77 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

3.7.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 179/38
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 19 May 2010 — Ravensburger v OHIM — Educa Borras (MEMORY)
   (Case T-108/09) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark MEMORY - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) and Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 7(1)(c) and Article 77 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   2010/C 179/66
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Ravensburger AG (Ravensburg, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Botis, agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Educa Borras, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: I. Valdelomar Serrano, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 January 2009 (Case R 305/2008-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Educa Borras, SA and Ravensburger AG.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Ravensburger AG to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 129, 6.6.2009.