CELEX: 52012PC0575
Language: en
Date: 2012-10-05
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken by the European Union within the International Jute Study Group as regards the negotiation of new Terms of Reference beyond 2014

|
			
		
		
		52012PC0575
		
			Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be taken by the European Union within the International Jute Study Group as regards the negotiation of new Terms of Reference beyond 2014 /* COM/2012/0575 final - 2012/0277 (NLE) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
The International Jute Study Group (IJSG)
was established under the aegis of United Nations Conference on Trade and
Development (UNCTAD) and entered into force in 2002. The Agreement establishing
the IJSG was accepted by the European Community on 15
April 2002 by Council Decision 2002/312/EC[1]. The IJSG is an intergovernmental body set up to function as the
International Commodity Board (ICB) for Jute, Kenaf and Allied Fibres. Its
mandate is to promote sustainable development of the global jute sector
incorporating a large role for the private sector and focusing on development
of new usage, commercialization and poverty alleviation. 
As the Terms of Reference of the current
Agreement come to an end in April 2014, the question of its renewal, through
negotiation of new Terms of Reference for the IJSG, has been discussed in the
IJSG Council meetings in 2011 and 2012. It will again be addressed at the next
IJSG Council meeting, to be held in November 2012, and a formal decision on
opening negotiations under the aegis of UNCTAD should be taken on this
occasion. 
In its present and likely future form, the
Commission considers that the IJSG does not bring any significant added value
for the EU. In commercial terms EU imports of jute and kenaf products amount to
approximately €80 million per year. Moreover, the IJSG does not provide market
analysis or trade statistics as the organisation entirely relies on the data
provided by the FAO Intergovernmental Group on Jute (IGG/JU). Although the
private sector is represented within the IJSG by some 150 companies, only 3 of
them come from the EU. 
From a development policy perspective, the
IJSG has a mandate to alleviate poverty, and as such, it is in line with the
development objectives of the EU. However, an independent evaluation carried
out in 2010 showed that the 15 development projects initiated by the IJSG over
the last 10 years have had a limited impact on poverty reduction. In this
context, the Commission considers that the EU can better address poverty
alleviation through its bilateral programmes (i.e. in Bangladesh and India, which account for 96% of Jute production) rather than by supporting the work
of the IJSG.
The main problem of the IJSG is its low
representation. Indeed, following the withdrawal of Switzerland in 2010, the
IJSG can only count India, Bangladesh as well as the EU and its 27 Member States among its members. Morocco which had shown interest in joining the IJSG is
deferring its adhesion following the recent election of a new government. Other
major importing countries like the USA, Canada and Turkey are not member of the
IJSG. As such, the IJSG could be considered as a regional organisation rather
than an international organisation. 
In light of the above, the Commission does
not recommend to open negotiations for the renewal of the IJSG Terms of
Reference. 
In order to continue to support the jute
sector, the Commission recommends to focus on the existing Intergovernmental
Group on Jute, Kenaf and Allied Fibres (IGG/JU), managed by FAO with a view to
transforming this group into an International Commodity Board. The main reasons
are the following:
·                        
In the Communication "Agricultural Commodity Chains, Dependence and Poverty"[2] the Commission considers that the value chain approach is key to
ensure participation and improve
revenue of smallholders. Since 2005, the Commodities
and Trade Division of FAO has developed a comprehensive expertise in the value
chain approach and has already applied it to other commodities like Hard
Fibres.
·                        
Being already responsible for the IGG on Hard
Fibres[3],
FAO could easily exploit commonalities and synergies which exist between Jute
and Hard Fibres. 
·                        
If the IJSG ceases to exist, the IGG/JU could be
designated as an International Commodity Board. Under this status, it will be
entrusted to initiate and monitor projects and to mobilize significant
resources from the Common Fund for Commodities but also from FAO members or
other donors. 
·                        
As regards participation, IGGs are open to all
Member Nations of the UN and do not require any lengthy process of
ratification. Moreover, it has been proven that granting the activity of
development projects to an IGG has a greater impact on the work of the Group
and on the participation of developing countries.
·                        
Reducing poverty and improving food security are
the main objectives of FAO. Considering, on the one hand, its extensive
experience in advising governments and in analysing/drafting policies, and on
the other hand, its experience at field level, particularly within small holder
farmers and entrepreneurs, it appears that FAO is well placed to steer policies
towards poverty reduction and to integrate poor communities concerns into
national policies. As a member of the FAO, the EU is well placed to ensure that
its objectives are well taken on board.
2.           Existing provision in the area of the
proposal
The Community has accepted the Agreement
establishing the International Jute Study Group on 15
April 2002 on the basis of Council Decision 2002/312/EC.
3.           Results of consultations with the
interested parties and impact assessments
At the Council Working Group on Commodities
(PROBA) of 14 June 2012, Member States expressed support for not opening
negotiations for the renewal of the IJSG.
4.           Legal elements of the proposal
·                        
Legal basis
Article 207 (3) and (4) and Article 218 (9)
of the Treaty on the Functioning of
the European Union
·                        
Subsidiarity
The proposal falls under exclusive
competence.
·                        
Proportionality
Not applicable
·                        
Choice of instrument
Proposed instrument: Council Decision.
5.           Budgetary implication
The annual contribution to the IJSG
administrative budget amounts to €310,000 (on July 2012). Focusing on
FAO-IGG/JU will not have any financial implication, as the running costs of the
FAO-IGG are covered by the regular budget of FAO. The EU will in fact save
€310,000.
Conclusion
In view of the above, the Commission
proposes that the Council establish the following position on behalf of the
European Union, and authorise the Commission accordingly to oppose the opening
of negotiations for the renewal of the IJSG Terms of Reference.
2012/0277 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
on the position to be taken by the
European Union within the International Jute Study Group as regards the
negotiation of new Terms of Reference beyond 2014
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to
the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 207(3)
and (4), in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
Having regard to the
proposal from the European Commission,
Whereas:
(1)       The Agreement establishing
the Terms of Reference of the International Jute Study Group, 2001 was accepted
on behalf of the European Community on 15 April 2002 by Council Decision
2002/312/EC[4].
(2)       The current Terms of
Reference expires on 30 April 2014 and the question of opening negotiations for
the renewal of these Terms of Reference will be discussed in the 15th session
of the International Jute Study Group Council meeting in November 2012.
(3)       Renewal of the
abovementioned Agreement is not in the interest of the Union
HAS ADOPTED THIS
DECISION: 
Article 1
The position of the Union within the
International Jute Study Group shall be to vote against opening negotiations
for the renewal of the Terms of Reference beyond 2014.
Article 2
The Commission is
hereby authorised to express this position within the International Jute Study
Group Council meetings.
Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on the
day of its adoption.
Done at Brussels, 
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
[1]               OJ L 112, 27.4.2002, p. 34.
[2]               COM(2004)89
[3]               The IGG on Hard Fibres has the status of
International Commodity Board as there is no international organisation dealing
with this commodity
[4]               OJ L 112, 27.4.2002, p. 34