CELEX: 62013TA0129
Language: en
Date: 2014-10-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-129/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014  — Alpiq RomIndustries and Alpiq RomEnergie v Commission (State aid — Electricity — Preferential tariffs — Decision to open the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU — Action for annulment — Act not subject to appeal — Aid measure implemented in full prior to the date on which the action was brought — Inadmissible)

24.11.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 421/36
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2014 — Alpiq RomIndustries and Alpiq RomEnergie v Commission
   (Case T-129/13) (1)
   
   ((State aid - Electricity - Preferential tariffs - Decision to open the procedure laid down in Article 108(2) TFEU - Action for annulment - Act not subject to appeal - Aid measure implemented in full prior to the date on which the action was brought - Inadmissible))
   2014/C 421/49
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Alpiq RomIndustries Srl (Bucarest, Romania) and Alpiq RomEnergie Srl (Bucarest) (represented by: H. Wollmann and F. Urlesberger, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Gippini Fournier, T. Maxian Rusche and R. Sauer, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of Commission Decision C (2012) 2542 final of 25 April 2012 to open the proceedings provided for in Article 108(2) TFEU concerning State Aid SA 33451 (2012/C) (ex 2012/NN) — Romania — Preferential tariffs in contracts between Hidroelectrica SA and electricity suppliers.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Alpiq RomIndustries Srl and Alpiq RomEnergie Srl to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 141, 18.5.2013.