CELEX: 62014TN0256
Language: en
Date: 2014-04-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-256/14: Action brought on 23 April 2014 — Giuntoli/OHIM — Société des produits Nestlé (CREMERIA TOSCANA)

4.8.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 253/32
            
         Action brought on 23 April 2014 — Giuntoli/OHIM — Société des produits Nestlé (CREMERIA TOSCANA)
   (Case T-256/14)
   2014/C 253/46
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Andrea Giuntoli (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société des produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 February 2014 given in Case R 886/2013-2;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order OHIM and those who oppose this request to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark containing the verbal elements ‘CREMERIA TOSCANA’ for goods and services in the Classes 30, 35 and 43 — Community trade mark application No 9 5 49  346
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Société des produits Nestlé SA
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: International trade mark registration of the figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘la Cremeria’
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in part
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the appealed decision, accepted the opposition and partially rejected the CTM application.
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.