CELEX: C2002/031/14
Language: en
Date: 2002-02-02 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 October 2001 in Case T-333/99: X v European Central Bank (Officials — Servants of the European Central Bank — Jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance — Legality of conditions of employment — Rights of the defence — Dismissal — Harassment — Misuse of the internet)

C 31/8                 EN                       Official Journal of the European Communities                                      2.2.2002
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
                                                                           Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks
                       of 18 October 2001                                  and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl, D. Schen-
                                                                           nen and S. Laitinen) — application brought against the
                                                                           decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for
       in Case T-333/99: X v European Central Bank (1)
                                                                           Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
                                                                           Designs) of 21 September 1999 (Case R 71/1999-3), which
(Officials — Servants of the European Central Bank —                       was notified to the applicant on 28 September 1999 — the
Jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance — Legality of                  Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of
conditions of employment — Rights of the defence —                         A. W. H. Meij, President, A. Potocki and J. Pirrung, Judges;
     Dismissal — Harassment — Misuse of the internet)                      D. Christensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a
                                                                           judgment on 19 September 2001, in which it:
                           (2002/C 31/14)
                                                                           1.    Dismisses the action;
                  (Language of the case: German)
                                                                           2.    Orders the parties to bear their own costs.
In Case T-333/99: X, residing in Frankfurt am Main (Germany),
represented by N. Pflüger, R. Steiner and S. Mittländer, lawyers,          (1) OJ C 63 of 4.3.00.
with an address for service in Luxembourg, against European
Central Bank (Agents: C. Zilioli and V. Saintot and B. Wägen-
baur) — application for annulment of the decision of the
Executive Board of the European Central Bank of 9 November
1999 to continue the suspension of the applicant and to
withhold one half of his basic salary, and of the decision of
18 November 1999 dismissing the applicant — the Court of
First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of J. Azizi, President,
K. Lenaerts and M. Jaeger, Judges; D. Christensen, Adminis-                    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
trator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 18 October
2001, in which it:                                                                              of 15 November 2001
1.    Dismisses the action;
                                                                           in Case T-349/00: Giorgio Lebedef v Commission of the
2.    Orders the parties to bear their own costs.                                             European Communities (1)
(1) OJ C 79 of 18.3.00.                                                    (Officials — 1974 framework agreement between the Com-
                                                                           mission and the trade unions/staff associations — Revision
                                                                           or modification — Consultation procedure — Introduction
                                                                                         of new modalities — Admissibility)
                                                                                                     (2002/C 31/16)
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                              (Language of the case: French)
                     of 19 September 2001
in Case T-336/99: Henkel KGaA v Office for Harmonis-
ation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)                     In Case T-349/00: Giorgio Lebedef, an official of the Com-
                             (OHIM) (1)                                    mission of the European Communities, residing at Senninger-
                                                                           berg (Luxembourg), represented by G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti,
(Community trade mark — Shape of a product for washing                     avocats, with an address for service in Luxembourg, v Com-
machines or dishwashers — Three-dimensional mark —                         mission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Valsesia
Absolute ground for refusal — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation                and J. Currall) — application for annulment of the ‘Operational
                          (EC) No 40/94)                                   Rules on the consultation levels, the consultation body and
                                                                           related procedures’ agreed between the Commission and the
                           (2002/C 31/15)                                  majority of the trade unions/staff associations on 19 January
                                                                           2000 or, alternatively, of the composition of the consultation
                                                                           body as provided for by those rules in so far as it excludes the
                  (Language of the case: German)
                                                                           trade union ‘Action & Défense’ from that body — the Court of
                                                                           First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: P. Mengozzi,
                                                                           President, and V. Tiili and R. M. Moura Ramos, Judges;
In Case T-336/99: Henkel KGaA, established in Düsseldorf                   J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a
(Germany), represented by H.F. Wissel and C. Osterrieth,                   judgment on 15 November 2001, in which it: