CELEX: C2007/269/122
Language: en
Date: 2007-11-10 00:00:00
Title: Case F-32/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 4 October 2007 — De la Cruz. v European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (Staff cases — Contract staff — Reform of the Staff Regulations of Officials — Former local staff — Fixing of classification and remuneration on recruitment — Equivalence of posts — Consultation of the Staff Committee)

10.11.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 269/68
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 4 October 2007 — De la Cruz. v European Agency for Safety and Health at Work
   (Case F-32/06) (1)
   
   (Staff cases - Contract staff - Reform of the Staff Regulations of Officials - Former local staff - Fixing of classification and remuneration on recruitment - Equivalence of posts - Consultation of the Staff Committee)
   (2007/C 269/122)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: María del Carmen de la Cruz (Galdakao, Spain) (represented by: G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (OHSA) (represented by: E. Ortega, C. Georges and J. G. Blanch, Agents, and S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)
   Re:
   First, annulment of the appointing authority's decisions refusing to re-classify the applicants, who are members of the contract staff classified in function group II, in function group III, and secondly, a claim for damages.
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decisions of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (OSHA) classifying the applicants in function group II by virtue of their contracts as members of the contract staff, signed on 28 and 29 April 2005;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Dismisses the remainder of the heads of claim;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the OSHA to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 131, 3.6.2006, p. 51.