CELEX: 62012TN0225
Language: en
Date: 2012-05-29 00:00:00
Title: Case T-225/12: Action brought on 29 May 2012 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — LĺDL MUSIC (LIDL express)

28.7.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 227/25
            
         Action brought on 29 May 2012 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — LĺDL MUSIC (LIDL express)
   (Case T-225/12)
   2012/C 227/43
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Schaeffer, M. Wolter and A. Marx, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: LĺDL MUSIC, spol. s r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade marks and Designs) of 21 March 2012 (R 2379/2010-1);
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘LIDL express’ for goods in class 15 — Community trade mark application No 6 857 536
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: National figurative mark and community word mark ‘LÍDL MUSIC’ for goods in class 15
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law:
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 15(1) in combination with Article 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009 and Rule 22(3) and (4) of Commission Regulation No 2868/95;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) in combination with Article 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.