CELEX: 62017TA0017
Language: en
Date: 2018-10-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-17/17: Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — Constantinescu v Parliament (Civil service — Officials — Education — Admission to childcare facilities — Decision to enrol a child at childcare facilities different from those at which the child was previously enrolled — Incorrect designation of the defendant in the application — Inadmissibility — Liability)

26.11.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 427/49
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — Constantinescu v Parliament
      (Case T-17/17) (1)
      
      (Civil service - Officials - Education - Admission to childcare facilities - Decision to enrol a child at childcare facilities different from those at which the child was previously enrolled - Incorrect designation of the defendant in the application - Inadmissibility - Liability)
      (2018/C 427/62)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Radu Constantinescu (Kreuzweiler, Germany) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and A. Blot, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and L. Deneys, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Action based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Office for Infrastructure and Logistics in Luxembourg (OIL) enrolling the applicant’s child at the childcare facilities of the European School Luxembourg II — Bertrange/Mamer and, accordingly, refusing the child’s enrolment at the childcare facilities of the European School Luxembourg I — Kirchberg, as well as the decision of the European Parliament of 7 October 2016 rejecting the applicant’s complaint, and, second, compensation for the material and non-material harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders the European Parliament to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.