CELEX: 62013TN0478
Language: en
Date: 2013-09-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-478/13: Action brought on 3 September 2013 — NumberFour v OHIM — Inaer Helicópteros (ENFORE)

23.11.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 344/58
            
         Action brought on 3 September 2013 — NumberFour v OHIM — Inaer Helicópteros (ENFORE)
   (Case T-478/13)
   2013/C 344/106
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: NumberFour AG (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: C. Götz, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Inaer Helicópteros, SA (Mutxamel, Spain)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 23 May 2013 given in Case R 1000/2012-5;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to bear the costs of proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘ENFORE’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 35, 36, 42 and 45 — Community trade mark application No 10 059 624
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘EINFOREX’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 42 and 45 — Community trade mark registration No 6 530 927
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in its entirety
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.