CELEX: C2007/297/02
Language: en
Date: 2007-12-08 00:00:00
Title: Case C-409/04: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 September 2007 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — Teleos PLC, Unique Distribution Ltd, Synectiv Ltd, New Communications Ltd, Quest Trading Company Ltd, Phones International Ltd, AGM Associates Ltd, DVD Components Ltd, Fonecomp Ltd, Bulk GSM Ltd, Libratech Ltd, Rapid Marketing Services Ltd, Earthshine Ltd, Stardex (UK) Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise (Sixth VAT Directive — First subparagraph of Article 28a(3) and first subparagraph of Article 28c(A)(a) — Intra-Community acquisition — Intra-Community supply — Exemption — Goods dispatched or transported to another Member State — Evidence — National measures to combat fraud)

8.12.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 297/2
            
         Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 27 September 2007 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — Teleos PLC, Unique Distribution Ltd, Synectiv Ltd, New Communications Ltd, Quest Trading Company Ltd, Phones International Ltd, AGM Associates Ltd, DVD Components Ltd, Fonecomp Ltd, Bulk GSM Ltd, Libratech Ltd, Rapid Marketing Services Ltd, Earthshine Ltd, Stardex (UK) Ltd v Commissioners of Customs & Excise
   (Case C-409/04) (1)
   
   (Sixth VAT Directive - First subparagraph of Article 28a(3) and first subparagraph of Article 28c(A)(a) - Intra-Community acquisition - Intra-Community supply - Exemption - Goods dispatched or transported to another Member State - Evidence - National measures to combat fraud)
   (2007/C 297/02)
   Language of the case: English
   Referring court
   High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court)
   Parties to the main proceedings
   
      Applicants: Teleos PLC, Unique Distribution Ltd, Synectiv Ltd, New Communications Ltd, Quest Trading Company Ltd, Phones International Ltd, AGM Associates Ltd, DVD Components Ltd, Fonecomp Ltd, Bulk GSM Ltd, Libratech Ltd, Rapid Marketing Services Ltd, Earthshine Ltd, Stardex (UK) Ltd
   
      Defendants: Commissioners of Customs & Excise
   Re:
   Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England and Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) — Interpretation of Article 28a(3) and Article 28c(A)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — Contract between a supplier and a purchaser of goods containing a clause providing that the purchaser will be responsible for transporting the goods from a warehouse in the Member State of supply to another Member State
   Operative part of the judgment
   
               1.
            
            
               The first subparagraph of Article 28a(3) and the first subparagraph of Article 28c(A)(a) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, as amended by Council Directive 2000/65/EC of 17 October 2000, are, having regard to the term ‘dispatched’ in those two provisions, to be interpreted as meaning that the intra-Community acquisition of goods is effected and the exemption of the intra-Community supply of goods becomes applicable only when the right to dispose of the goods as owner has been transferred to the purchaser and the supplier establishes that those goods have been dispatched or transported to another Member State and that, as a result of that dispatch or that transport, they have physically left the territory of the Member State of supply.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The first subparagraph of Article 28c(A)(a) of Sixth Directive 77/388, as amended by Directive 2000/65, is to be interpreted as precluding the competent authorities of the Member State of supply from requiring a supplier, who acted in good faith and submitted evidence establishing, at first sight, his right to the exemption of an intra-Community supply of goods, subsequently to account for value added tax on those goods where that evidence is found to be false, without, however, the supplier's involvement in the tax evasion being established, provided that the supplier took every reasonable measure in his power to ensure that the intra-Community supply he was effecting did not lead to his participation in such evasion.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The fact that the purchaser made a declaration concerning intra-Community acquisition, such as that in question in the main proceedings, to the tax authorities of the Member State of destination may constitute additional evidence tending to establish that the goods have actually left the territory of the Member State of supply, but it does not constitute conclusive proof for the purposes of the exemption from value added tax of an intra-Community supply.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 300, 4.12.2004.