CELEX: C2005/205/37
Language: en
Date: 2005-08-20 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 22 June 2005 in Case T-34/04 Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Application for a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Turkish Power’ — Earlier word mark POWER — Opposition proceedings — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

20.8.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 205/21
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 22 June 2005
   in Case T-34/04 Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Application for a Community figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘Turkish Power’ - Earlier word mark POWER - Opposition proceedings - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2005/C 205/37)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case T-34/04: Plus Warenhandelsgesellschaft mbH, established in Mühlheim (Germany), represented by B. Piepenbrink, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agent: G. Schneider), the other parties to the proceedings before the OHIM Board of Appeal having been Joachim Bälz and Friemar Hiller, residing in Stuttgart (Germany) — action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 November 2003 (Case R 620/2002-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Tengelmann Warenhandelsgesellschaft and Bälz and Hiller — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Lindh and V. Vadapalas, Judges; C. Kristensen, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 22 June 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the application;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004