CELEX: 62015TN0446
Language: en
Date: 2015-08-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-446/15: Action brought on 3 August 2015 — Indecopi/OHIM — Synergy Group (PISCO)

28.9.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 320/42
            
         Action brought on 3 August 2015 — Indecopi/OHIM — Synergy Group (PISCO)
   (Case T-446/15)
   (2015/C 320/59)
   Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual (Indecopi) (San Borja, Peru) (represented by: M. Pomares Caballero and A. Pomares Caballero, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Synergy Group sp. z o.o. (Wrocław, Poland)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘PISCO’ — Application for registration No 1016 7674
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 June 2015 in Case R 1291/2014-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               alter the contested decision, by declaring that the requirements for the application of the relative ground for refusal laid down in Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 are met in the present case, or, in the alternative, annul that decision; and
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 23 of Regulation No 110/2008;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.