CELEX: C2006/074/02
Language: en
Date: 2006-03-25 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of  19 January 2006  in Case C-547/03 P Asian Institute of Technology (AIT) v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Asia-Invest Programme — Public call for proposals — Contract — Article 111 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance — Manifest inadmissibility — No legal interest in bringing proceedings — Article 64 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance — Measures of organisation of procedure — Request for production of documents — Parties requested to make written submissions on certain aspects of the proceedings)

25.3.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 74/1
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
   
   (Second Chamber)
   of 19 January 2006
   in Case C-547/03 P Asian Institute of Technology (AIT) v Commission of the European Communities (1)
   
   (Appeal - Asia-Invest Programme - Public call for proposals - Contract - Article 111 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance - Manifest inadmissibility - No legal interest in bringing proceedings - Article 64 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance - Measures of organisation of procedure - Request for production of documents - Parties requested to make written submissions on certain aspects of the proceedings)
   (2006/C 74/02)
   Language of the case: French
   In Case C-547/03 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice lodged on 22 December 2003, by Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), established in Pathumthani (Thailand) (lawyer: H. Teissier du Cros), the other party to the proceedings being Commission of the European Communities (represented by P.J. Kuijper and B. Schöfer, Agents) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, J. Makarczyk, R. Silva de Lapuerta, P. Kūris and G. Arestis (Rapporteur), Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; K. Sztranc, Administrator, gave a judgment on 19 January 2006, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the appeal;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the Asian Institute of Technology (AIT) to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 47 of 21. 2. 2004.