CELEX: 62006FA0113
Language: en
Date: 2008-12-11 00:00:00
Title: Case F-113/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2008 — Bouis and Others v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Second round promotion — 2005 promotion procedure — Award of priority points — Transitional provisions — General implementing provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Equal treatment — Admissibility)

7.2.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 32/49
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 11 December 2008 — Bouis and Others v Commission
   (Case F-113/06) (1)
   
   (Staff case - Officials - ‘Second round’ promotion - 2005 promotion procedure - Award of priority points - Transitional provisions - General implementing provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Equal treatment - Admissibility)
   (2009/C 32/96)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicants: Didier Bouis (Overijse, Belgium) and Others (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: V. Joris and D. Martin, Agents)
   Re:
   Staff case — First, annulment of the decision of the Commission not to include the applicants either on the merit list or on the list of those promoted to grade A*13 in the 2005 promotion procedure; second, annulment of the decisions to award the applicants transitional priority points inasmuch as these points are limited to one point per year of seniority in grade; third, annulment of the decisions not to award any other priority points to the applicants.
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders each party to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 281, 18.11.2006, p. 49.