CELEX: 62017TN0533
Language: en
Date: 2017-08-11 00:00:00
Title: Case T-533/17: Action brought on 11 August 2017 — Next design+produktion v EUIPO — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp (nuuna)

2.10.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 330/18
            
         Action brought on 11 August 2017 — Next design+produktion v EUIPO — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp (nuuna)
   (Case T-533/17)
   (2017/C 330/23)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Next design+produktion GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: M. Hirsch, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark (Representation of ‘nuuna’) — Application for registration No 10 772 606
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2017 in Case R 1448/2016-1
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2017;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 1(1) Regulation No 207/2009 and of the principle of autonomy;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of the principles of legal certainty, legality and sound administration.