CELEX: 61979CO0567
Language: en
Date: 1981-10-14 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 October 1981. # Jakob Flamm v Commission and Council of the European Communities. # Case 567/79 A.

Avis juridique important

|

61979O0567

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 October 1981.  -  Jakob Flamm v Commission and Council of the European Communities.  -  Case 567/79 A.  

European Court reports 1981 Page 02383

PartiesSubject of the caseGroundsDecision on costsOperative part
Parties

IN CASE 567/79 A JAKOB FLAMM , RESIDING IN THE VIA GRAZIA DELLEDDA , RANCO ( VARESE ), ITALY , REPRESENTED BY B . POTTHAST AND H.-J . RUBER , OF THE COLOGNE BAR , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE CHAMBERS OF V . BIEL , 18A , RUE DES GLACIS ,   APPLICANT ,   V  1 . COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY J . PIPKORN , A MEMBER OF ITS LEGAL DEPARTMENT , ACTING AS AGENT , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF O . MONTALTO , JEAN MONNET BUILDING , KIRCHBERG ,   2.COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES , REPRESENTED BY ITS LEGAL ADVISER , J . CARBERY , ACTING AS AGENT , ASSISTED BY TITO GALLAS , WITH AN ADDRESS FOR SERVICE IN LUXEMBOURG AT THE OFFICE OF D . FONTEIN , DIRECTOR OF THE LEGAL DEPARTMENT OF THE EUROPEAN INVESTMENT BANK , KIRCHBERG ,    DEFENDANTS ,    

Subject of the case

APPLICATION CHALLENGING THE TERMS FOR REPAYMENT OF BUILDING LOANS GRANTED BY THE COMMISSION , AS AMENDED BY THE LATTER AS FROM APRIL 1979 ON THE BASIS OF COUNCIL REGULATION NO 3085/78 AND NO 3086/78 OF 21 DECEMBER 1978 ( OFFICIAL JOURNAL L 369 , PP . 6 AND 8 ),  

Grounds

THE COUNCIL IS NEITHER THE APPLICANT ' S APPOINTING AUTHORITY NOR A PARTY TO THE LOAN CONTRACT , WHICH REFERS SOLELY TO THE COMMISSION AND THE APPLICANT . THE COUNCIL CANNOT THEREFORE BE PARTY TO THIS ACTION , A VIEW WHICH IS SHARED BY THE APPLICANT HIMSELF . THE APPLICANT HAS NOT ASKED TO DISCONTINUE THE ACTION .       IN THESE CIRCUMSTANCES THE COURT ( FIRST CHAMBER ) HOLDS THAT IT IS NOT NECESSARY TO OPEN THE ORAL PROCEDURE .   THE APPLICATION IS INADMISSIBLE IN SO FAR AS IT IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE COUNCIL AND MUST THEREFORE BE DISMISSED .    

Decision on costs

COSTS ACCORDING TO ARTICLE 69 ( 2 ) OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE THE UNSUCCESSFUL PARTY IS TO BE ORDERED TO PAY THE COSTS .   HOWEVER , ARTICLE 70 OF THE RULES OF PROCEDURE STATES THAT IN ACTIONS BROUGHT BY SERVANTS OF THE COMMUNITIES THE INSTITUTIONS SHALL BEAR THEIR OWN COSTS .    

Operative part

ON THOSE GROUNDS , THE COURT ( FIRST CHAMBER )   HEREBY ORDERS AS FOLLOWS :   1 . THE APPLICATION IS DISMISSED AS INADMISSIBLE IN SO FAR AS IT IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE COUNCIL .   2 . THE APPLICANT AND THE COUNCIL SHALL BEAR THEIR OWN COSTS .