CELEX: 62010FA0074
Language: en
Date: 2011-09-29 00:00:00
Title: Case F-74/10: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Kimman v Commission (Staff cases — Civil servants — Article 43 of the Staff Regulations — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — 2009 appraisal — Classification in a level of performance — Decision awarding promotion points — Appraisal report — Opinion of the ad hoc group — Infringement of the duty to give reasons — Plea raised of its own motion — Burden of proof)

12.5.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 138/24
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 29 September 2011 — Kimman v Commission
   (Case F-74/10) (1)
   
   (Staff cases - Civil servants - Article 43 of the Staff Regulations - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - 2009 appraisal - Classification in a level of performance - Decision awarding promotion points - Appraisal report - Opinion of the ad hoc group - Infringement of the duty to give reasons - Plea raised of its own motion - Burden of proof)
   2012/C 138/47
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Eugène Émile Kimman (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and P. Pecho, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application to annul the applicant’s staff report for 2008
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the European Commission to bear a quarter of the applicant’s costs, in addition to its own costs;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay three quarters of his own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 301, 6.11.2010, p. 63.