CELEX: 62015TN0538
Language: en
Date: 2015-09-17 00:00:00
Title: Case T-538/15: Action brought on 17 September 2015 — Regent University v OHIM — Regent’s College (REGENT UNIVERSITY)

9.11.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 371/42
            
         Action brought on 17 September 2015 — Regent University v OHIM — Regent’s College (REGENT UNIVERSITY)
   (Case T-538/15)
   (2015/C 371/43)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Regent University (Virginia Beach, United States) (represented by: D. Wilkinson, Solicitor and E. Himsworth, Barrister)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Regent’s College (London, United Kingdom)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘REGENT UNIVERSITY’ — Community trade mark registration No 4 711 594
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 July 2015 in Case R 1859/2014-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               remit the matter for further consideration by the Board;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant before the Board;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the cancellation applicant to pay the costs of the proceedings, including the costs incurred by the applicant before the Board, in the event that the cancellation applicant becomes an intervening party in these proceedings.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringements of Article 53(1) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.