CELEX: 62014CA0021
Language: en
Date: 2015-07-16 00:00:00
Title: Case C-21/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — European Commission v Rusal Armenal ZAO, Council of the European Union (Appeal — Dumping — Imports of certain aluminium foil originating in Armenia, Brazil and China — Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) — Article 2(7) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 — Whether compatible with the Agreement on implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT))

21.9.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 311/7
            
         Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 July 2015 — European Commission v Rusal Armenal ZAO, Council of the European Union
   (Case C-21/14 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Dumping - Imports of certain aluminium foil originating in Armenia, Brazil and China - Accession of the Republic of Armenia to the World Trade Organisation (WTO) - Article 2(7) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96 - Whether compatible with the Agreement on implementation of Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994 (GATT)))
   (2015/C 311/08)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, M. França and T. Maxian Rusche, Agents)
   
      Other parties to the proceedings: Rusal Armenal ZAO (represented by B. Evtimov, lawyer), Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert and J. P. Hix, Agents, and by B. O’Connor, Solicitor, and S. Gubel, avocat)
   
      Intervener in support of the appellant: European Parliament (represented by D. Warin and A. Auersperger Matić, Agents)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1)
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Rusal Armenal v Council (T-512/09, EU:T:2013:571);
            
         
               2)
            
            
               Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union for it to rule on the pleas in law on which it did not adjudicate;
            
         
               3)
            
            
               Reserves the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.