CELEX: 
Language: en
Date: 1978-10-14 00:00:00
Title: Commission Decision of 28 September 1978 fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EEC) No 1775/78

No L 288 /50                             Official Journal of the European Communities                            14. 10 . 78
                                                   COMMISSION DECISION
                                                     of 28 September 1978
              fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation
                                    to tender issued in Regulation (EEC) No 1775/78
                                                           (78/836/EEC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN                                      cles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2746/75 must be
COMMUNITIES,                                                        taken into account ; whereas a contract is awarded to
                                                                    any tenderer whose tender is equal to or less than the
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European               maximum export refund ;
Economic Community,
                                                                    Whereas the application of the abovementioned
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No                        criteria to the current market situation for the cereal
2727/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organiza­                  in question results in the maximum export refund
tion of the market in cereals ('), as last amended by               being fixed at the amount specified in Article 1 ;
Regulation (EEC) No 1254/78 (2),                                    whereas the quantities of barley in respect of which
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No                        refunds are fixed amount to 202 000 tonnes ;
2746/75 of 29 October 1975 laying down general                      Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision
rules for granting export refunds on cereals and                    are in accordance with the opinion of the Manage­
criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds (3), and             ment Committee for Cereals,
in particular Article 5 thereof,
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No                     HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :
 1775/78 of 24 July 1978 on an invitation to tender for
the refund for the export of barley to Zones I, II, III,                                   Article 1
 IV, V and VI (4),
Whereas in Regulation (EEC) No 1775/78 an invita­                   The maximum export refund on barley is hereby fixed
tion to tender was issued for the export refund on                  on the basis of the tenders submitted by 28 September
barley ; whereas, according to the notice of invitation              1978 at 72-50 units of account per tonne.
to tender (5) accompanying that Regulation, the total
                                                                                            Article 2
quantity in respect of which the export refund may be
 fixed is approximately 600 000 tonnes ;                            This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Whereas, pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regula­
tion (EEC) No 279/75 of 4 February 1975 laying
down detailed rules for the application of the system               Done at Brussels, 28 September 1978 .
of tendering for export refunds on cereals (6), the
                                                                                              For the Commission
 Commission, acting under the procedure laid down in
Article 26 of Regulation (EEC) No 2727/75, may                                                 Finn GUNDELACH
 decide to fix a maximum export refund ; whereas in
 fixing this maximum the criteria provided for in Arti­                                           Vice-President
(>) OJ  No  L 281 , 1 . 11 . 1975, p. 1.
(2) OJ  No  L 156, 14. 6. 1978, p.    1.
(3) OJ  No  L 281 , 1 . 11 . 1975, p. 78 .
(4) OJ  No  L 204, 28. 7. 1978, p.    28 .
(5) OJ  No  C 180, 29. 7. 1978, p.    2.
(6) OJ  No  L 31 , 5. 2. 1975, p. 8 .