CELEX: 62014TN0515
Language: en
Date: 2014-07-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-515/14 P: Appeal brought on 9 July 2014 by Christodoulos Alexandrou against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 May 2014 in Case F-34/13 Alexandrou v Commission

1.9.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 292/56
            
         Appeal brought on 9 July 2014 by Christodoulos Alexandrou against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 May 2014 in Case F-34/13 Alexandrou v Commission
   (Case T-515/14 P)
   2014/C 292/69
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Christodoulos Alexandrou (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by R. Duta, lawyer)
   
      Respondent: European Commission
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The appellant claims that the General Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               admit the present appeal, declare it well founded;
            
         
               —
            
            
               therefore, amend or set aside the judgment under appeal, on the basis of the grounds set out;
            
         
               —
            
            
               in so far as is necessary, refer the case in the course of the proceedings to the European Civil Service Tribunal;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the respondent to pay the entirety of the costs and expenses of the two proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of its action, the appellant invokes three grounds of appeal.
   
               1.
            
            
               First ground of appeal alleges a failure to give sufficient reasons in the contested decision, connected in particular with the Commission’s refusal to grant the appellant’s application to have access to the seven questions which he allegedly failed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second ground of appeal alleges an infringement of the right to an effective remedy, in so far as, without having the questions requested at his disposal, the appellant was deprived of the means of an effective remedy against the decision to reject his application.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Third ground of appeal alleges a failure, by the Civil Service Tribunal, to use Article 4(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal.