CELEX: 62013TN0347
Language: en
Date: 2013-07-01 00:00:00
Title: Case T-347/13: Action brought on 1 July 2013 — Hawe Hydraulik v OHIM — HaWi Energietechnik (HAWI)

31.8.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 252/37
            
         Action brought on 1 July 2013 — Hawe Hydraulik v OHIM — HaWi Energietechnik (HAWI)
   (Case T-347/13)
   2013/C 252/63
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Hawe Hydraulik SE (Munich, Germany) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: HaWi Energietechnik AG (Eggenfelden, Germany)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 26 April 2013 in Case R 1690/2012-4 relating to Community trade mark application No 6 558 589‘HAWI’;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: HaWi Energietechnik AG
   
      Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘HAWI’ for goods and services in Classes 7, 9, 35, 37 and 42 — Community trade mark application No 6 558 589
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: the applicant
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: the figurative mark including the word element ‘HAWE’ for goods in Classes 7 and 9
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was rejected
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
   
      Pleas in law:
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 42(2) in conjunction with Article 78(1)(f) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of the right to be heard regarding the erroneous assessment of the evidence constituted by the declaration on oath;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of the right to be heard regarding the erroneous assessment of the evidence constituted by the extracts from the Internet;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of the right to be heard regarding the assessment of the proof of use in its entirety;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of the right to be heard regarding the failure to take the proof of use into account;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009