CELEX: 62015TN0364
Language: en
Date: 2015-07-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-364/15: Action brought on 4 July 2015 — ADR Center v Commission

14.9.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 302/63
            
         Action brought on 4 July 2015 — ADR Center v Commission
   (Case T-364/15)
   (2015/C 302/78)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: ADR Center Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: L. Tantalo, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the Commission decision C (2015) 3117 final of 4 May 2015,
            
         
               —
            
            
               alternatively, declare eligible all the costs found inadmissible by the Commission,
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendants and any interveners to pay the applicant’s legal costs and expenses for this procedure in an amount to be determined equitably by the Court.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
   
               1.
            
            
               First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission lacks the competence to adopt a recovery order in contractual matters.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the decision relies on errors of fact and assessment.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission misused its power.
            
         
               4.
            
            
               Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission breached their obligation to state reasons.