CELEX: 62008TB0440
Language: en
Date: 2013-11-07 00:00:00
Title: Case T-440/08: Order of the General Court of 7 November 2013 — 1-2-3.TV v OHIM — ZDF and Televersal Film- und Fernsehproduktion (1-2-3.TV) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Withdrawal of opposition — No need to adjudicate)

21.12.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 377/16
            
         Order of the General Court of 7 November 2013 — 1-2-3.TV v OHIM — ZDF and Televersal Film- und Fernsehproduktion (1-2-3.TV)
   (Case T-440/08) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition - Withdrawal of opposition - No need to adjudicate)
   2013/C 377/37
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: 1-2-3.TV GmbH (Unterföhring, Germany) (represented: initially by V. von Bomhard, A. Renck, T. Dolde and E. Nicolás Gómez, subsequently by K. Kleinschmidt and U. Grübler, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)
   
      Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF) (Mainz, Germany); and Televersal Film- und Fernsehproduktion GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented: initially by B. Krause and F. Cordt, subsequently by B. Krause, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 June 2008 (Case R 1076/2007-1), relating to opposition proceedings between 1-2-3.TV GmbH and Zweites Deutsches Fernsehen (ZDF) and Televersal Film- und Fernsehproduktion GmbH.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               There is no further need to adjudicate on the action.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The applicant and the interveners shall bear their own costs and each pay half of the costs of the defendant.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 327, 20.12.2008.