CELEX: 62017TN0304
Language: en
Date: 2017-05-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-304/17: Action brought on 18 May 2017 — Sata v EUIPO — Zhejiang Rongpeng Air Tools (5000)

17.7.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 231/47
            
         Action brought on 18 May 2017 — Sata v EUIPO — Zhejiang Rongpeng Air Tools (5000)
   (Case T-304/17)
   (2017/C 231/59)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Sata GmbH & Co. KG (Kornwestheim, Germany) (represented by: M.-C. Simon, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Zhejiang Rongpeng Air Tools Co. Ltd (Pengjie Town, China)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: The sign ‘5000’ — EU trade mark No 12 333 555
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 March 2017 in Case R 655/2016-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO to pay the costs;
            
         
               —
            
            
               in the event that the respondent before the Board of Appeal decides to intervene in the proceedings, order that intervener to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of the principle of equal treatment and the principle of sound administration.