CELEX: C2003/184/80
Language: en
Date: 2003-08-02 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 May 2003 in Case T-70/02: Griffin (Europe) Headquaters NV v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (Decision No 2455/2001/EC — Action for annulment — Inadmissibility)

2.8.2003               EN                           Official Journal of the European Union                                         C 184/35
        ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                Maldegem and C. Mereu, lawyers, v European Parliament
                                                                            (Agents, C. Pennera and M. Moore) and Council of the
                           of 6 May 2003                                    European Union (Agents: M. Sims-Robertson and B. Hoff-
                                                                            Nielsen), supported by Commission of the European Commu-
                                                                            nities (Agents: G. Valero Jordana and K. Fitch): Application for
in Case T-46/02: Finchimica SpA and I.PI.CI — Industria
                                                                            partial annulment of Decision No 2455/2001/EC of the
Prodotti Chimici SpA v European Parliament and Council
                                                                            European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November
                     of the European Union (1)
                                                                            2001 establishing the list of priority substances in the field of
                                                                            water policy and amending Directive 2000/60/EC (OJ 2001
(Decision No 2455/2001/EC — Action for annulment —                          L 331, p. 1), the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber),
                           Inadmissibility)                                 composed of: K. Lenaerts, President, J. Azizi and M. Jaeger,
                                                                            Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 6 May 2003,
                          (2003/C 184/78)                                   the operative part of which is as follows:
                    (Language of the case: English)
                                                                            1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
In Case T-46/02, Finchimica SpA, established in Manerbio                    2.    The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay the costs
(Italy), I.PI.CI — Industria Prodotti Chimici SpA, established in                 incurred by the Parliament and the Council.
Novate Milanese (Italy), represented by K. Van Maldegem and
C. Mereu, lawyers, v European Parliament (Agents: C. Pennera
and M. Moore) and Council of the European Union (Agents:                    3.    The Commission shall bear its own costs.
M. Sims-Robertson and B. Hoff-Nielsen), supported by
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Valero
Jordana and K. Fitch): Application for partial annulment of                 (1) OJ C 144 of 15.06.2002.
Decision No 2455/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 20 November 2001 establishing the list of
priority substances in the field of water policy and amending
Directive 2000/60/EC (OJ 2001 L 331, p. 1), the Court of First
Instance (Third Chamber), composed of: K. Lenaerts, President,
J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an
order on , the operative part of which is as follows:
1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
                                                                                   ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
2.    The applicants shall bear their own costs and pay the costs
      incurred by the Parliament and the Council.
3.    The Commission shall bear its own costs.                                                         of 6 May 2003
(1) OJ C 144 of 15.06.2002.                                                 in Case T-70/02: Griffin (Europe) Headquaters NV v
                                                                            European Parliament and Council of the European
                                                                                                          Union (1)
                                                                            (Decision No 2455/2001/EC — Action for annulment —
                                                                                                       Inadmissibility)
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                           of 6 May 2003                                                              (2003/C 184/80)
in Case T-57/02: Makhteshim Agan Holding BV v
European Parliament and Council of the European                                                 (Language of the case: English)
                              Union (1)
(Decision No 2455/2001/EC — Action for annulment —
                           Inadmissibility)                                 In Case T-70/02, Griffin (Europe) Headquarters NV, established
                                                                            in Zaventem (Belgium), represented by K. Van Maldegem and
                          (2003/C 184/79)                                   C. Mereu, lawyers, v European Parliament (Agents: C. Pennera
                                                                            and M. Moore) and Council of the European Union (Agents:
                                                                            M. Sims-Robertson and B. Hoff-Nielsen), supported by
                    (Language of the case: English)                         Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Valero
                                                                            Jordana and K. Fitch): Application for partial annulment of
                                                                            Decision No 2455/2001/EC of the European Parliament and of
In Case T-57/02, Makhteshim Agan Holding BV, established in                 the Council of 20 November 2001 establishing the list of
Amsterdam (Netherlands), represented by P. Logelain, K. Van                 priority substances in the field of water policy and amending
 ---pagebreak--- C 184/36               EN                           Official Journal of the European Union                                          2.8.2003
Directive 2000/60/EC (OJ 2001 L 331, p. 1), the Court of First                     ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
Instance (Third Chamber), composed of: K. Lenaerts, President,
J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an                                       of 23 April 2003
order on 6 May 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:
                                                                            in Case T-73/03: Bernard Zaoui and Others v Commission
1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible.                                        of the European Communities (1)
2.    The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay the costs              (Non-contractual liability of the Community — Application
      incurred by the Parliament and the Council.                                                   manifestly unfounded)
3.    The Commission shall bear its own costs.
                                                                                                       (2003/C 184/82)
(1) OJ C 144 of 15.06.2002.                                                                      (Language of the case: French)
                                                                            In Case T-73/03, Bernard Zaoui, residing in Combs La Ville
                                                                            (France), Lucien Zaoui, residing in Netanya (Israel) and Deborah
                                                                            Zaoui, residing in Ramat Gan (Israel), represented by
                                                                            J.A. Buchinger, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxem-
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                 bourg, against the Commission of the European Communities
                                                                            — application for compensation for damage allegedly suffered
                                                                            by the applicants following an attack carried out in Netanya
                         of 30 April 2003                                   (Israel) on 27 March 2002 — the Court of First Instance (First
                                                                            Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf, President, H. Legal and
                                                                            M.E. Martins Ribero, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order
in Case T-154/02: Villiger Söhne GmbH v Council of the
                                                                            on 23 April 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:
                        European Union (1)
                                                                            1)    The application is rejected.
(Action for annulment — Article 3(1) and first indent of
Article 4(2) of Directive 2002/10/EC — Structure and rate
of excise duty applied on manufactured tobacco — Manifestly                 2)    The applicants are ordered to pay the costs.
                            inadmissible)
                                                                            (1) OJ 2003 C 124.
                          (2003/C 184/81)
                   (Language of the case: German)
In Case T-154/02: Villiger Söhne GmbH, established in Wald-                 Action brought on 10 April 2003 by Greenpeace Limited
shut-Tiengen (Germany), represented by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer,                and Nexgen Group Limited (trading as ECOTRICITY)
against Council of the European Union (Agents: F. Gijón and                    against the Commission of the European Communities
M. Simm) — application for annulment of Article 3(1) of
Council Directive 2002/10/EC of 12 February 2002 amending
Directives 92/79/EEC, 92/80/EEC and 95/59/EC as regards the                                            (Case T-121/03)
structure and rates of excise duty applied on manufactured
tobacco (OJ 2002 L 46, p. 26) and, in the alternative, of the                                          (2003/C 184/83)
first indent of Article 4(2) of that directive — the Court of
First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, Presi-
dent of the Chamber, J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung,                                   (Language of the case: English)
Registrar, made an order on 30 April 2003, the operative part
of which is as follows:
                                                                            An action against the Commission of the European Commu-
1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible.                         nities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
                                                                            European Communities on 10 April 2003 by Greenpeace
                                                                            Limited, London, United Kingdom, and Nexgen Group Limited
2.    The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.
                                                                            (trading as ECOTRICITY), Gloucestershire, United Kingdom,
                                                                            represented by P. Lasok QC, Mr J. Turner and Ms R. Haynes,
3.    There is no need to adjudicate on the applications for leave to       Barristers.
      intervene.
                                                                            The applicant claims that the Court should:
(1) OJ C 191 10.8.02.
                                                                            —     annul the Contested Decision and order the Commission
                                                                                  to pay the Applicants costs.