CELEX: 62012CA0472
Language: en
Date: 2014-07-17 00:00:00
Title: Case C-472/12: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Panasonic Italia SpA, Panasonic Marketing Europe GmbH, Scerni Logistics S.r.l. v Agenzia delle Dogane di Milano (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 — Common Customs Tariff — Tariff classification — Combined Nomenclature — Headings 8471 and 8528 — Plasma screens — Function as computer screen — Potential function as a television screen, after insertion of a video card)

15.9.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 315/5
            
         Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Panasonic Italia SpA, Panasonic Marketing Europe GmbH, Scerni Logistics S.r.l. v Agenzia delle Dogane di Milano
   (Case C-472/12) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff classification - Combined Nomenclature - Headings 8471 and 8528 - Plasma screens - Function as computer screen - Potential function as a television screen, after insertion of a video card))
   2014/C 315/07
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Referring court
   
   Corte suprema di cassazione
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicants: Panasonic Italia SpA, Panasonic Marketing Europe GmbH, Scerni Logistics S.r.l.
   
      Defendant: Agenzia delle Dogane di Milano
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   
               1.
            
            
               For the purpose of tariff classification in the Combined Nomenclature set out in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, in the versions resulting successively from Commission Regulation (EC) No 2388/2000 of 13 October 2000, Commission Regulation (EC) No 2031/2001 of 6 August 2001, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1832/2002 of 1 August 2002, and Commission Regulation (EC) No 1789/2003 of 11 September 2003 of screens with the objective characteristics at issue in the main proceedings, account should be taken of their inherent intended purpose, which consists in reproducing the data from an automatic data-processing machine and from composite video signals. Such screens must be classified under subheading 8471 60 90 of the Combined Nomenclature if they are used solely or mainly in an automatic data-processing system, within the meaning of Note 5B(a) of Chapter 84 of the Combined Nomenclature, or under subheading 8528 21 90 thereof if that is not the case, which is a matter for the national court to determine on the basis of the objective characteristics of the screens at issue in the main proceedings, and in particular those mentioned in the Explanatory Notes relating to heading 8471 of the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System established by the International Convention on the Harmonised Commodity Description and Coding System concluded in Brussels on 14 June 1983, with its amending protocol of 24 June 1986, in particular in points 1 to 5 of the part of Chapter I D relating to display units for automatic data-processing machines;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Commission Regulation (EC) No 754/2004 of 21 April 2004 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature cannot be applied retroactively.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 399, 22.12.2012.