CELEX: 62013CN0209
Language: en
Date: 2013-04-18 00:00:00
Title: Case C-209/13: Action brought on 18 April 2013 — United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union

15.6.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 171/22
            
         Action brought on 18 April 2013 — United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Council of the European Union
   (Case C-209/13)
   2013/C 171/44
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: E. Jenkinson, S. Behzadi-Spencer, Agents, M. Hoskins QC, P. Baker QC, V. Wakefield, Barrister)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union
   
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
   
               —
            
            
               Annul Council Decision 2013/52/EU (1) authorising enhanced cooperation in the area of financial transaction tax; and
            
         
               —
            
            
               Require the Council to pay the United Kingdom’s costs of these proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      First plea in law, alleging that Council Decision 2013/52/EU is contrary to Article 327 TFEU because it authorizes the adoption of a financial transaction tax (‘FTT’) with extraterritorial effects which will fail to respect the competences, rights and obligations of the Non-Participating States.
   
      Second plea in law, alleging that Council Decision 2013/52/EU is unlawful because it authorizes the adoption of an FTT with extraterritorial effects for which there is no justification in customary international law.
   
      Third plea in law, alleging that Council Decision 2013/52/EU is contrary to Article 332 TFEU because it authorizes enhanced cooperation for an FTT, the implementation of which will inevitably cause costs to be incurred by the Non-Participating States.
   
      (1)  OJ L 22, p. 11