CELEX: 62006FA0029
Language: en
Date: 2011-09-26 00:00:00
Title: Case F-29/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 September 2011 — Arnaldos Rosauro and Others v Commission (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Article 5(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Internal competitions for transfer from one category to another published before 1 May 2004 — Candidates appearing on reserve lists before 1 May 2006 — Grading — Application of a multiplication factor of less than 1 — Loss of promotion points)

19.11.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 340/34
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 September 2011 — Arnaldos Rosauro and Others v Commission
   (Case F-29/06) (1)
   
   (Staff case - Officials - Appointment - Article 5(2) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Internal competitions for transfer from one category to another published before 1 May 2004 - Candidates appearing on reserve lists before 1 May 2006 - Grading - Application of a multiplication factor of less than 1 - Loss of promotion points)
   2011/C 340/66
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Andres Arnaldos Rosauro and Others (Brussels, Belgium) (represented, initially, by S. Rodrigues and A. Jaume, subsequently by S. Rodrigues, and, finally, by S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by J. Currall and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Annulment of Commission decisions appointing the applicants, officials in Category C and successful candidates in an internal competition for change of category, in Grades B*3/B*4, maintaining their remuneration at the level prior to the change of category by applying a multiplying coeffficient, and resetting their promotion points at zero.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 121 of 20.05.06, p. 19.