CELEX: C2004/021/09
Language: en
Date: 2004-01-24 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 December 2003 in Case C-448/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesvergabeamt): EVN AG, Wienstrom GmbH v Republik Österreich, third parties: Stadtwerke Klagenfurt AG and Kärntner Elektrizitäts-AG (Directive 93/36/EEC — Public supply contracts — Concept of the most economically advantageous tender — Award criterion giving preference to electricity produced from renewable energy sources — Directive 89/665/EEC — Public procurement review proceedings — Unlawful decisions — Possibility of annulment only in the case of material influence on the outcome of the tender procedure — Illegality of an award criterion — Obligation to cancel the invitation to tender)

24.1.2004                EN                           Official Journal of the European Union                                                    C 21/5
      Directive 90/219, and by failing to transpose the provisions of               of the assessment of the most economically advantageous tender
      that directive in respect of certain contained use by the Ministry            for a contract for the supply of electricity, an award criterion
      of Defence, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations          with a weighting of 45 % which requires that the electricity
      under that directive;                                                         supplied be produced from renewable energy sources. The fact
                                                                                    that that criterion does not necessarily serve to achieve the
2.    Dismisses the remainder of the action;                                        objective pursued is irrelevant in that regard.
3.    Orders each party to bear its own costs.                                      On the other hand, that legislation does preclude such a
                                                                                    criterion where
(1) OJ C 369 of 22.12.2001.
                                                                                    —      It is not accompanied by requirements which permit the
                                                                                           accuracy of the information contained in the tenders to be
                                                                                           effectively verified,
                  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                                    —      it requires tenderers to state how much electricity they can
                           (Sixth Chamber)                                                 supply from renewable energy sources to a non-defined
                                                                                           group of consumers, and allocates the maximum number
                        of 4 December 2003                                                 of points to whichever tenderer states the highest amount,
                                                                                           where the supply volume is taken into account only to the
in Case C-448/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from                                  extent that it exceeds the volume of consumption expected
the Bundesvergabeamt): EVN AG, Wienstrom GmbH v                                            in the context of the procurement.
Republik Österreich, third parties: Stadtwerke Klagenfurt
             AG and Kärntner Elektrizitäts-AG (1)                                   It is for the national court to determine whether, despite the
                                                                                    contracting authority’s failure to stipulate a specific supply
(Directive 93/36/EEC — Public supply contracts — Concept                            period, the award criterion was sufficiently clearly formulated to
of the most economically advantageous tender — Award                                satisfy the requirements of equal treatment and transparency of
criterion giving preference to electricity produced from                            procedures for awarding public contracts.
renewable energy sources — Directive 89/665/EEC — Public
procurement review proceedings — Unlawful decisions —                         2.    The Community legislation on public procurement requires the
Possibility of annulment only in the case of material influ-                        contracting authority to cancel an invitation to tender if it
ence on the outcome of the tender procedure — Illegality of                         transpires in review proceedings under Article 1 of Directive
an award criterion — Obligation to cancel the invitation to                         89/665 that a decision relating to one of the award criteria
                                 tender)                                            laid down by that authority is unlawful and it is therefore
                                                                                    annulled by the review body.
                            (2004/C 21/09)
                                                                              (1) OJ C 84 of 6.4.2002.
                    (Language of the case: German)
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
                    in the European Court Reports)                                                JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                                                           (Fifth Chamber)
In Case C-448/01: Reference to the Court under Article 234
EC by the Bundesvergabeamt (Austria) for a preliminary ruling                                          of 27 November 2003
in the proceedings pending before that body between EVN
AG, Wienstrom GmbH and Republik Österreich, third parties:                    in Case C-497/01 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from
Stadtwerke Klagenfurt AG and Kärntner Elektrizitäts-AG, on                    the Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg): Zita
the interpretation of Article 26 of Council Directive 93/36/                  Modes Sàrl v Administration de l’enregistrement et des
EEC of 14 June 1993 coordinating procedures for the award                                                     domaines (1)
of public supply contracts (OJ 1993 L 199, p. 1) and of
Articles 1 and 2(1)(b) of Council Directive 89/665/EEC of
                                                                              (Sixth VAT Directive — Article 5(8) — Transfer of a
21 December 1989 on the coordination of the laws, regu-
                                                                              totality of assets — Continuation by the transferee in
lations and administrative provisions relating to the application
                                                                              the same branch of business as the transferor — Legal
of review procedures to the award of public supply and public
                                                                                              authorisation to pursue the activity)
works contracts (OJ 1989 L 395, p. 33), as amended by
Directive 92/50/EEC of 18 June 1992 relating to the coordi-
nation of procedures for the award of public service contracts                                              (2004/C 21/10)
(OJ 1992 L 209, p. 1), the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed
of: V. Skouris (Rapporteur), acting for the President of the                                         (Language of the case: French)
Sixth Chamber, C. Gulmann, J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and
N. Colneric, Judges; J. Mischo, Advocate General; H. A. Rühl,                 (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment                                    in the European Court Reports)
on 4 December 2003, in which it has ruled:
1.    The Community legislation on public procurement does not                In Case C-497/01: Reference to the Court under Article 234
      preclude a contracting authority from applying, in the context          EC by the Tribunal d’arrondissement de Luxembourg (Luxem-