CELEX: 62014TN0194
Language: en
Date: 2014-03-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-194/14: Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Bristol Global v OHIM — Bridgestone (AEROSTONE)

19.5.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 151/33
            
         Action brought on 20 March 2014 — Bristol Global v OHIM — Bridgestone (AEROSTONE)
   (Case T-194/14)
   2014/C 151/42
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Bristol Global Co. Ltd (Birmingham, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Bozhinova, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Bridgestone Corp. (Tokyo, Japan)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 12 December 2013 given in Case R 916/2013-2.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The figurative trade mark containing the verbal element ‘AEROSTONE’ for goods in Class 12 — Community trade mark application No 10 066 736
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: Community trademarks registrations of the word marks ‘STONE’ for goods in Classes 12, 28, 35 and 37 and ‘BRIDGESTONE’ for goods in Class 12; well-known trade mark and non-registered sign containing verbal element ‘BRIDGESTONE’
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Partly upheld the opposition
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(4) and 8(5) CTMR.