CELEX: C2007/269/11
Language: en
Date: 2007-11-10 00:00:00
Title: Case C-287/05: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands)) — D.P.W. Hendrix v Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen (Social security for migrant workers — Articles 12 EC, 17 EC, 18 EC and 39 EC — Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 — Article 4(2a), Article 10a and Annex IIa — Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 — Article 7(1) — Non-contributory benefits — Netherlands benefit for disabled young people — Non-exportability)

10.11.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 269/5
            
         Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 11 September 2007 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands)) — D.P.W. Hendrix v Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen
   (Case C-287/05) (1)
   
   (Social security for migrant workers - Articles 12 EC, 17 EC, 18 EC and 39 EC - Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 - Article 4(2a), Article 10a and Annex IIa - Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 - Article 7(1) - Non-contributory benefits - Netherlands benefit for disabled young people - Non-exportability)
   (2007/C 269/11)
   Language of the case: Dutch
   Referring court
   Centrale Raad van Beroep (Netherlands)
   Parties to the main proceedings
   
      Applicant: D.P.W. Hendrix
   
      Defendant: Raad van Bestuur van het Uitvoeringsinstituut Werknemersverzekeringen
   Re:
   Reference for a preliminary ruling — Centrale Raad van Beroep — Interpretation of Articles 4(2a) and 10a of and Annex IIa to Regulation No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1971(II), p. 416), as amended by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1247/92 of 30 April 1992 (OJ 1992 L 136, p. 1) — Interpretation of Article 7(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community (OJ, English Special Edition 1968(II), p. 475) — Interpretation of Articles 12, 18 and 39 EC — Special non-contributory benefits — Coordinating scheme provided for in Article 10a of Regulation No 1408/71 — Scope — Whether or not it includes a benefit for disabled young people referred to in Annex IIa to Regulation No 1408/71 — Recipients resident in the Netherlands
   Operative part of the judgment
   
               1.
            
            
               A benefit such as that provided under the Law on provision of incapacity benefit to disabled young people (Wet arbeidsongeschiktheidsvoorziening jonggehandicapten) of 24 April 1997 must be regarded as a special non-contributory benefit within the meaning of Article 4(2a) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community, as amended and updated by Council Regulation (EC) No 118/97 of 2 December 1996, as amended by Council Regulation (EC) No 1223/98 of 4 June 1998, with the result that only the coordinating provision in Article 10a of that regulation must be applied to persons who are in the situation of the applicant in the main proceedings and that payment of that benefit may validly be reserved to persons who reside on the territory of the Member State which provides the benefit. The fact that the person concerned previously received a benefit for disabled young people which was exportable is of no relevance to the application of those provisions.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Article 39 EC and Article 7 of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 of the Council of 15 October 1968 on freedom of movement for workers within the Community must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which applies Article 4(2a) and Article 10a of Regulation No 1408/71, as amended and updated by Regulation No 118/97, as amended by Regulation No 1223/98, and provides that a special non-contributory benefit listed in Annex IIa to Regulation No 1408/71 may be granted only to persons who are resident in the national territory. However, implementation of that legislation must not entail an infringement of the rights of a person in a situation such as that of the applicant in the main proceedings which goes beyond what is required to achieve the legitimate objective pursued by the national legislation. It is for the national court, which must, so far as possible, interpret the national legislation in conformity with Community law, to take account, in particular, of the fact that the worker in question has maintained all of his economic and social links to the Member State of origin.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 296, 26.11.2005.