CELEX: 62016TN0111
Language: en
Date: 2016-03-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-111/16: Action brought on 18 March 2016 — Prada v EUIPO — The Rich Prada International (THE RICH PRADA)

17.5.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 175/21
            
         Action brought on 18 March 2016 — Prada v EUIPO — The Rich Prada International (THE RICH PRADA)
   (Case T-111/16)
   (2016/C 175/25)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Prada SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: The Rich Prada International PT (Surabaya, Indonesia)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘THE RICH PRADA’ — Application for registration No 10 228 948
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 January 2016 in Joined Cases R 3076/2014-2 and R 3186/2014-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision in part, thereby granting Opposition Proceedings No B 2 012 477 in its entirety;
            
         
               —
            
            
               in the alternative, uphold the decision of the Second Board of Appeal in its entirety;
            
         
               —
            
            
               reverse the order to Prada SA to bear the costs of the appeal to the Board of Appeal, in the amount of €550, and order The Rich Prada International PT to pay such costs;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO to pay the costs of the procedure.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.