CELEX: C2007/129/12
Language: en
Date: 2007-06-09 00:00:00
Title: Case C-165/07: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 27 March 2007 — Skatteministeriet v Ecco Sko A/S

9.6.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 129/8
            
         Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Vestre Landsret (Denmark) lodged on 27 March 2007 — Skatteministeriet v Ecco Sko A/S
   (Case C-165/07)
   (2007/C 129/12)
   Language of the case: Danish
   Referring court
   Vestre Landsret
   Parties to the main proceedings
   
      Applicant: Skatteministeriet
   
      Defendant: Ecco Sko A/S
   Questions referred
   
               ‘1.
            
            
               Is Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature (1), as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 2388/2000 of 13 October 2000 (2), to be interpreted as meaning that footwear such as that in question in the main proceedings should be classified as footwear with uppers of leather under CN heading 6403 or as footwear with uppers of textile materials under CN heading 6404?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Is Additional Note 1 to Chapter 64 of the CN, which was incorporated by Commission Regulation No 3800/92 of 23 December 1992 (3) amending Council Regulation No 2658/87, compatible with Note 4(a) to Chapter 64 of the CN?’
            
         
      (1)  Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1).
   
      (2)  Commission Regulation (EC) No 2388/2000 of 13 October 2000 amending Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 2000 L 264, p. 1); corrigendum: OJ L 276, 28.10.2000, p. 92.
   
      (3)  OJ 1992 L 384, p. 8.