CELEX: C1998/258/58
Language: en
Date: 1998-08-15 00:00:00
Title: ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE of 25 June 1998 in Case T-24/97: Coopérative des Éleveurs de la Vendée, de l'Anjou et du Poitou (CEVAP) and Coopérative Agricole d'Éleveurs de Veaux du Bocage (CEVB)v Council of the European Union (Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Beef and veal - Intervention mechanisms - Premium for the early marketing of veal calves - Average carcase weight - Criteria for fixing the same - Action for annulment - Inadmissibility)

15.8.98               EN                  Official Journal of the European Communities                                   C 258/33
     ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                            SAS, established at CondeÂ-sur-Vire, Denkavit France
                       of 15 June 1998                               SARL, established at Montreuil-Bellay (France), Sobeval
                                                                     Viande SA, established at PeÂrigueux (France), Serval SA,
in Case T-149/95 (92): Etablissements J. Richard Ducros v            established at Sainte-Eanne (France), Besnier Industrie
        Commission of the European Communities (1)                   SNC, established at Bourgbarre (France), Sovida SA,
                      (Taxation of costs)                            established at ChaÃteaubriand (France), Ouest EÂlevage
                                                                     SICA, established at Ploudaniel (France), Guinde SA,
                         (98/C 258/56)                               established at Montauban (France), Tarbouriech SA,
                                                                     established at Villeneuve-sur-Lot (France), Mamellor
               (Language of the case: French)                        SARL, established at Charnay-leÁs-MaÃcon (France),
                                                                     Coopagri Bretagne, established at Landerneau (France),
                                                                     Collet et Compagnie SA, established at ChaÃteaubourg
In Case T-149/95 (92): Etablissements J. Richard Ducros,             (France), KermeneÂ SA, established at Saint-Jacut-du-MeneÂ
established in Paris, represented by Philippe Genin, of the          (France), and Vals SA, established at Champagne (France),
Lyons Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at              represented initially by Deborah Kryvian and subsequently
the Chambers of Aloyse May, 31 Grand-Rue, v                          by Philippe Denesle, of the Rouen Bar, with an address for
Commission of the European Communities (Agents:                      service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Marc
initially, Jean-Paul Keppenne and, subsequently, Xavier              Loesch, 11 Rue Goethe, v Commission of the European
Lewis), supported by CMF SpA and CMF Sud SpA,                        Communities (Agent: GeÂrard Berscheid) Ð application for
established at Pignatero Maggiore (Italy), represented by            annulment of Article 1(9) and (14) of Commission
Mario Siragusa, of the Rome Bar, and Giuseppe                        Regulation (EC) No 2311/96 of 2 December 1996, of
Scassellati-Sforzolini, of the Bologna Bar, with an address          Commission Regulation (EC) No 18/97 of 8 January 1997
for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Elvinger,               and of Commission Regulation (EC) No 200/97 of
Hoss & Prussen, 2 Place Winston Churchill Ð application              31 January 1997 amending Regulation (EEC) No 3886/92
for taxation of costs made pursuant to the judgment                  laying down detailed rules for the application of premium
delivered by the Court of First Instance on 5 November               schemes in the beef and veal sector (respectively, OJ L 313
1997 in Case T-149/95 Ducros v Commission [1997]                     of 3.12.1996, p. 9, OJ L 5 of 9.1.1997, p. 17, and OJ L 31
ECR II-2031 Ð the Court of First Instance (First                     of 1.2.1997, p. 62) Ð the Court of First Instance (Fifth
Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of B.                       Chamber), composed of: J. Azizi, President, and R. García-
Vesterdorf, President, and C. W. Bellamy, R. M. Moura                Valdecasas and M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar,
Ramos, J. Pirrung and P. Mengozzi, Judges; H. Jung,                  made an order on 25 June 1998, the operative part of
Registrar, made an order on 15 June 1998, the operative              which is as follows:
part of which is as follows:
                                                                     1. The applications are dismissed as inadmissible.
The total amount of the costs to be reimbursed by the
applicant to the interveners in Case T-149/95, including             2. The applicants shall bear their own costs and shall be
those incurred by the parties in the present proceedings,                 jointly and severally liable to pay the costs of the
shall be BFR 600 000.                                                     Commission.
(1) OJ C 248 of 23.9.1995.                                           (1) OJ C 94 of 22.3.1997 and OJ C 166 of 31.5.1997.
                                                                          ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
     ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                            of 25 June 1998
                       of 25 June 1998
                                                                     in Case T-24/97: CoopeÂrative des EÂleveurs de la VendeÂe,
in Joined Cases T-20/97, T-61/97 and T-76/97: Sofivo                 de l'Anjou et du Poitou (CEVAP) and CoopeÂrative
SAS and Others v Commission of the European                          Agricole d'EÂleveurs de Veaux du Bocage (CEVB)v Council
                        Communities (1)                                                of the European Union (1)
(Agriculture Ð Common organisation of the markets Ð                  (Agriculture Ð Common organisation of the markets Ð
Beef and veal Ð Intervention mechanisms Ð Premium for                Beef and veal Ð Intervention mechanisms Ð Premium
the early marketing of veal calves Ð Average carcase                 for the early marketing of veal calves Ð Average carcase
weight Ð Criteria for fixing the same Ð Action for                   weight Ð Criteria for fixing the same Ð Action for
                annulment Ð Inadmissibility)                                         annulment Ð Inadmissibility)
                         (98/C 258/57)                                                       (98/C 258/58)
                                                                                    (Language of the case: French)
               (Language of the case: French)
                                                                     In Case T-24/97: CoopeÂrative des EÂleveurs de la VendeÂe,
In Joined Cases T-20/97, T-61/97 and T-76/97: Sofivo                 de l'Anjou et du Poitou (CEVAP), established at Saint-
SAS, established at CondeÂ-sur-Vire (France), Sofivo                 Laurent-sur-SeÁvre (France), and CoopeÂrative Agricole
Production SAS, established at BreÂceÂ (France), Sovinor             d'EÂleveurs de Veaux du Bocage (CEVB), established at
 ---pagebreak--- C 258/34              EN                 Official Journal of the European Communities                                    15.8.98
Champagne (France), represented by FrancËois Sarda, of              Ramos, J. Pirrung and P. Mengozzi, Judges; H. Jung,
the Paris Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg            Registrar, made an order on 30 June 1998, the operative
at the Chambers of Messrs Bonn & Schmitt, 7 Val Sainte-             part of which is as follows:
Croix, v Council of the European Union (Agent: John
Carbery), supported by Commission of the European                   1. There is no need to adjudicate on the action in this
Communities (Agent: GeÂrard Berscheid) Ð application for                case.
annulment of Article 1(4) of Council Regulation (EC)
No 2222/96 of 18 November 1996 amending Regulation                  2. There is no need to adjudicate             either on the
(EEC) No 805/68 on the common organization of the                       applications to intervene by the          Foreign Trade
market in beef and veal (OJ L 296 of 21.11.1996, p. 50)                 Association and the ConfeÂdeÂration      EuropeÂenne de
Ð the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed                 l'Industrie de la Chaussure, or on        the applicants'
of: J. Azizi, President, and R. García-Valdecasas and M.                application for confidential treatment.
Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
25 June 1998, the operative part of which is as follows:            3. The Commission is ordered to pay its own costs and
                                                                        one-half of the costs of the applicants, who are
                                                                        ordered to bear the remainder thereof.
1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
                                                                    4. The applicants to intervene are ordered to bear their
2. The applicants shall bear their own costs and shall be               own costs.
    jointly and severally liable to pay the costs of the
    Council. The Commission shall bear its own costs.               (1) OJ C 166 of 31.5.1997.
(1) OJ C 94 of 22.3.1997 and OJ C 166 of 31.5.1997.
                                                                         ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                            of 8 June 1998
     ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                           in Case T-148/97: David T. Keeling v Office for
          (First Chamber, Extended Composition)                     Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and
                       of 30 June 1998                                                        Designs) (1)
in Case T-73/97: British Shoe Corporation Footwear                  (Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade
Supplies Ltd v Commission of the European                           Marks and Designs) Ð Decision of the President of the
                       Communities (1)                              Office concerning the organisation of the Boards of
                                                                    Appeal Ð Action for annulment Ð Article 173 of the EC
(Dumping Ð Textile footwear originating in the People's                               Treaty Ð Inadmissibility)
Republic of China and Indonesia Ð Commission
                                                                                            (98/C 258/60)
Regulation imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty Ð
Action for annulment Ð Subsequent regulation imposing                              (Language of the case: English)
 a definitive anti-dumping duty Ð No need to adjudicate)
                        (98/C 258/59)                               In Case T-148/97: David T. Keeling, member of a Board
                                                                    of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal
               (Language of the case: English)                      Market (Trade Marks and Designs), residing in Alicante
                                                                    (Spain), represented by Arthur Alan Dashwood, Barrister,
                                                                    of the Bar of England and Wales, instructed by Edward
In Case T-73/97: British Shoe Corporation Footwear
                                                                    Lewis, Solicitors, with an address for service in
Supplies Ltd, with its registered office in Leicester (United
                                                                    Luxembourg at the Chambers of ArseÁne Kronshagen, 22
Kingdom), Clarks International Ltd, with its registered
                                                                    Rue Marie-AdeÂlaïde, against Office for Harmonisation in
office in Somerset (United Kingdom), Deichmann-Schuhe
                                                                    the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Agents:
GmbH & Co. Vertriebs KG, with its registered office in
                                                                    Oreste Montalto and JoaÄo Paulo Miranda de Sousa) Ð
Essen (Germany), Groupe AndreÂ SA, with its registered
                                                                    application for annulment of Decision No ADM-97-3 of
office in Paris, Reno Versandhandel GmbH, with its
                                                                    the President of the Office for Harmonisation in the
registered office in Thaleischweiler-Froschen (Germany),
                                                                    Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 21 February
Leder & Schuh AG, with its registered office in Graz
                                                                    1997 concerning the organisation of the Boards of Appeal
(Austria), represented by Alasdair Bell and Mark Powell,
                                                                    Ð the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed
Solicitors, with an address for service in Luxembourg at
                                                                    of: V. Tiili, President, C. P. BrieÈt and A. Potocki, Judges;
the Chambers of Marc Loesch, 11 Rue Goethe, against
                                                                    H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 8 June 1998, the
the Commission of the European Communities (Agent:
                                                                    operative part of which is as follows:
Nicholas Khan) Ð application for the annulment of
Commission Regulation (EC) No 165/97 of 28 January                  1. The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
1997 imposing a provisional anti-dumping duty on
imports of certain footwear with textile uppers originating         2. The applicant shall bear the costs.
in the People's Republic of China and Indonesia (OJ L 29
of 31.1.1997, p. 3) Ð the Court of First Instance (First            (1) OJ C 199 of 28.6.1997.
Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of B.
Vesterdorf, President, C. W. Bellamy, R. M. Moura