CELEX: 62017TA0089
Language: en
Date: 2018-06-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-89/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2018 — Erwin Müller v EUIPO — Novus Tablet Technology Finland (NOVUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark NOVUS — Earlier EU word and figurative marks NOVUS and novus — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court)

201807130592004242018/C 268/43892017TC26820180730EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180619353622Case T-89/17: Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2018 — Erwin Müller v EUIPO — Novus Tablet Technology Finland (NOVUS) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark NOVUS — Earlier EU word and figurative marks NOVUS and novus — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court)
 ---documentbreak--- C2682018EN3520120180619EN0043352362Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2018 — Erwin Müller v EUIPO — Novus Tablet Technology Finland (NOVUS)
   (Case T-89/17) (
         1
      )
   ‛(EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark NOVUS — Earlier EU word and figurative marks NOVUS and novus — Relative ground for refusal — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Evidence presented for the first time before the General Court)’2018/C 268/43Language of the case: German
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Erwin Müller GmbH (Lingen, Germany) (represented by: N. Grüger, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: V. Mensing and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Novus Tablet Technology Finland Oy (Turku, Finland)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 November 2016 (Case R 2413/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Erwin Müller and Novus Tablet Technology Finland.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
            1.
         
         
            Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 November 2016 (Case R 2413/2015-4) in so far as it concerns the ‘special holders for mobile phones’ referred to in the trade mark application;
         
      
            2.
         
         
            Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
         
      
            3.
         
         
            Orders Erwin Müller GmbH and EUIPO to bear their own respective costs.
         
      (
         1
      )	OJ C 112, 10.4.2017.