CELEX: 62017TN0572
Language: en
Date: 2017-08-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-572/17: Action brought on 21 August 2017 — UC v Parliament

30.10.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 369/31
            
         Action brought on 21 August 2017 — UC v Parliament
   (Case T-572/17)
   (2017/C 369/43)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: UC (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Parliament
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               declare the present action admissible and well founded
            
         and consequently
   
               —
            
            
               annul the applicant’s staff report for 2015 and the decision to award him only two merit points for that year;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the appointing authority of 9 May 2017 rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 13 January 2017;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay damages, to be fixed ex aequo et bono at EUR 9 000, to compensate the applicant for the non-material damage suffered;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay all the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
   
               1.
            
            
               First plea in law, alleging, first, infringement of Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights and Article 25 of the Staff Regulations of Officials and, secondly, infringement of the obligation to state reasons and of the applicant’s rights of defence.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard and Article 41 of the Charter.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Third plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment.