CELEX: 62014CA0415
Language: en
Date: 2016-01-28 00:00:00
Title: Case C-415/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — Quimitéchnica.com — Comércio e Indústria Química, SA, José de Mello — Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA v European Commission (Appeal — Cartels — European market in phosphates for animal feed — Fine imposed on the appellants following a settlement procedure — Payment of the fine in instalments — Requirement to provide a bank guarantee at a bank with a long-term ‘AA’ credit rating — Duty to state reasons)

21.3.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 106/7
            
         Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2016 — Quimitéchnica.com — Comércio e Indústria Química, SA, José de Mello — Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA v European Commission
   (Case C-415/14 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Cartels - European market in phosphates for animal feed - Fine imposed on the appellants following a settlement procedure - Payment of the fine in instalments - Requirement to provide a bank guarantee at a bank with a long-term ‘AA’ credit rating - Duty to state reasons))
   (2016/C 106/08)
   Language of the case: Portuguese
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellants: Quimitéchnica.com — Comércio e Indústria Química, SA, José de Mello — Sociedade Gestora de Participações Sociais, SA (represented by: J. Calheiros, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka and B. Mongin, acting as Agents, and M. Marques Mendes, lawyer)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 June 2015 in Quimitéchnica.com and José de Mello v Commission;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Refers the matter back before the General Court of the European Union;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Reserves the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 388, 3.11.2014.