CELEX: C2004/094/113
Language: en
Date: 2004-04-17 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the court of first instance (second chamber) of 28 January 2004 in Case T-180/01: Euragri Srl v Commission of the European Communities

17.4.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 94/39
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE (SECOND CHAMBER)
   
   of 28 January 2004
   in Case T-180/01: Euragri Srl v Commission of the European Communities (1)
   
   (EAGGF - Withdrawal of financial assistance - Articles 24 and 25 of Regulation (EEC) No 4253/88)
   (2004/C 94/113)
   Language of the case: Italian
   In Case T-180/01: Euragri Srl, established at Monte Vidon Combatte (Italy), represented by W. Massucci, lawyer, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: initially L. Visaggio and M. Moretto and subsequently C. Cattabriga and M. Moretto) — application for annulment of Commission Decision C (2001) 1274 of 6 June 2001 withdrawing the assistance granted to Euragri Srl by Commission Decision C (92) 3214 of 3 December 1992 concerning grant of a contribution from the EAGGF, Guidance Section, pursuant to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4256/88 of 19 December 1988 laying down provisions for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 2052/88 as regards the EAGGF Guidance Section (OJ 1988 L 374, p.25), in connection with Project No 92.IT.06.069 entitled ‘Pilot demonstration project for the use of new “Endovena” (intravenous) technology on fruit trees’ – the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of N.J. Forwood, President, J. Pirrung and A.W. Meij, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 28 January 2004, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismissed the application.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Ordered the applicant to pay the costs, including those incurred in connection with the application for interim measures.
            
         
      (1)  OJ No C 275 of 29.9.01