CELEX: 62008CA0260
Language: en
Date: 2009-12-10 00:00:00
Title: Case C-260/08: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 December 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Bundesfinanzdirektion West v Heko Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH (Community Customs Code — Article 24 — Non-preferential origin of goods — Definition of substantial processing or working — Criterion for a change of tariff heading — Steel cables manufactured in North Korea using stranded steel wire originating in China)

30.1.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 24/8
            
         Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 December 2009 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Bundesfinanzdirektion West v Heko Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH
   (Case C-260/08) (1)
   
   (Community Customs Code - Article 24 - Non-preferential origin of goods - Definition of ‘substantial processing or working’ - Criterion for a change of tariff heading - Steel cables manufactured in North Korea using stranded steel wire originating in China)
   2010/C 24/11
   Language of the case: German
   
      Referring court
   
   Bundesgerichtshof
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Bundesfinanzdirektion West
   
      Defendant: Heko Industrieerzeugnisse GmbH
   
      Re:
   
   Reference for a preliminary ruling — Bundesfinanzhof — Interpretation of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302, p. 1) –Determining the origin of steel cables manufactured in North Korea under a process using steel wires originating in China — Criteria to be taken into consideration for the purpose of treating a given manufacturing stage as establishing the non-preferential origin of a product — Potential significance of the fact that the tariff heading remains unchanged subsequent to the processing at issue.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   With regard to goods classified under heading 7312 of the Combined Nomenclature constituting Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1719/2005 of 27 October 2005, ‘substantial processing or working’ within the meaning of Article 24 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, may cover not only such processing or working as leads to the goods which have undergone the process being classified under a different heading of the Combined Nomenclature, but also such processing or working as results, without such a change of heading, in the creation of a product with properties and a composition of its own which it did not have before the process.
   
      (1)  OJ C 247, 27.9.2008.