CELEX: 62019TN0677
Language: en
Date: 2019-10-02 00:00:00
Title: Case T-677/19: Action brought on 2 October 2019 – Polfarmex v EUIPO – Kaminski (SYRENA)

25.11.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 399/98
            
         
      Action brought on 2 October 2019 – Polfarmex v EUIPO – Kaminski (SYRENA)
      (Case T-677/19)
      (2019/C 399/116)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Polfarmex S.A. (Kutno, Poland) (represented by: B. Matusiewicz-Kulig, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Arkadiusz Kaminski (Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
      
         Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark SYRENA – European Union trade mark No 9 262 767
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2019 in Joined Cases R 1861/2018-2 and R 1840/2018-2
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision in the part declaring the trade mark at issue to remain in force for “cars” in class 12;
               
            and
      
                  —
               
               
                  alter the contested decision by declaring the trade mark at issue revoked in its entirety, including the goods“cars” in class 12 due to lack of genuine use;
               
            alternatively,
      
                  —
               
               
                  remit the case to the EUIPO;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings.
               
            
         Pleas in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Articles 94(1) and 95(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with paragraph 42 of the preamble of that Regulation and Article 55(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Articles 18(1), 58(1)(a) and 58(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council in conjunction with Articles 94(1), 95(1) and paragraph 42 of the preamble of that Regulation and Article 55(1) of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Articles 58(2) and 64(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Articles 94(1), 64(1) and paragraph 42 of the preamble of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.