CELEX: 62018CN0216
Language: en
Date: 2018-03-27 00:00:00
Title: Case C-216/18: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) made on 27 March 2018 — Minister for Justice and Equality v LM

4.6.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 190/13
            
         Reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court (Ireland) made on 27 March 2018 — Minister for Justice and Equality v LM
   (Case C-216/18)
   (2018/C 190/18)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Referring court
   
   High Court (Ireland)
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Minister for Justice and Equality
   
      Defendant: LM
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Notwithstanding the conclusions of the Court of Justice in Aranyosi and Caldararu, where a national court determines there is cogent evidence that conditions in the issuing Member State are incompatible with the fundamental right to a fair trial because the system of justice itself in the issuing Member State is no longer operating under the rule of law, is it necessary for the executing judicial authority to make any further assessment, specific and precise, as to the exposure of the individual concerned to the risk of unfair trial where his trial will take place within a system no longer operating within the rule of law?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               If the test to be applied requires a specific assessment of the requested person’s real risk of a flagrant denial of justice and where the national court has concluded that there is a systemic breach of the rule of law, is the national court as executing judicial authority obliged to revert to the issuing judicial authority for any further necessary information that could enable the national court discount the existence of the risk to an unfair trial and if so, what guarantees as to fair trial would be required?