CELEX: 62015TN0495
Language: en
Date: 2015-08-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-495/15: Action brought on 27 August 2015 — Sociedad agraria de transformación no 9982 Montecitrus v OHIM — Spanish Oranges (MOUNTAIN CITRUS SPAIN)

26.10.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 354/40
            
         Action brought on 27 August 2015 — Sociedad agraria de transformación no 9982 Montecitrus v OHIM — Spanish Oranges (MOUNTAIN CITRUS SPAIN)
   (Case T-495/15)
   (2015/C 354/49)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Sociedad agraria de transformación no 9982 Montecitrus (Pulpí, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Spanish Oranges, SL (Castellón, Spain)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘MOUNTAIN CITRUS SPAIN’ — Application for registration No 11 290 293
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 June 2015 in Case R 871/2014-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               set aside the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               refuse the application of the trademark at issue for all goods covered in classes 29 and 31;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Intervener to pay the costs.
            
         
      Plea(s) in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.