CELEX: 62007TA0189
Language: en
Date: 2009-06-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-189/07: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 June 2009 — Frosch Touristik v OHIM — DSR touristik (FLUGBÖRSE) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark FLUGBÖRSE — Material date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity — Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

18.7.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 167/10
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 June 2009 — Frosch Touristik v OHIM — DSR touristik (FLUGBÖRSE)
   (Case T-189/07) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark FLUGBÖRSE - Material date for the examination of an absolute ground for invalidity - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2009/C 167/20
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Frosch Touristik GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: H. Lauf and T. Raab, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by B. Schmidt, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: DSR touristik GmbH (Karlsruhe, Germany)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 March 2007 (Case R 1084/2004-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between DSR touristik GmbH and Frosch Touristik GmbH
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 March 2007 (Case R 1084/2004-4).
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 183, 4.8.2007.