CELEX: C2005/155/32
Language: en
Date: 2005-06-25 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 April 2005 in Case T-286/03 The Gillette Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark RIGHT GUARD XTREME sport — Earlier national figurative mark WILKINSON SWORD XTREME III — Likelihood of confusion — Refusal of registration — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

25.6.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 155/16
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 13 April 2005
   in Case T-286/03 The Gillette Company v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark RIGHT GUARD XTREME sport - Earlier national figurative mark WILKINSON SWORD XTREME III - Likelihood of confusion - Refusal of registration - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2005/C 155/32)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case T-286/03: The Gillette Company, established in Boston (United States of America), represented by A. Ebert-Weidenfeller and L. Kouker, lawyers, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: G. Schneider and J. Weberndörfer), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance, being Wilkinson Sword GmbH, established in Solingen (Germany), represented by E. Kessler, lawyer — action against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 April 2003 (Case R 221/2002-4), refusing registration of the figurative mark RIGHT GUARD XTREME sport — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and I. Pelikánová, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 13 April 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 251, 18.10.2003.