CELEX: 62011CA0615
Language: en
Date: 2013-05-16 00:00:00
Title: Case C-615/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 May 2013 — European Commission v Ryanair Ltd (Appeal — Action for failure to act — Article 232 EC — Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 — Article 20(2) — State aid allegedly granted to Italian airlines — Complaint — Lack of a decision from the Commission)

3.8.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 225/16
            
         Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 16 May 2013 — European Commission v Ryanair Ltd
   (Case C-615/11 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Action for failure to act - Article 232 EC - Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 - Article 20(2) - State aid allegedly granted to Italian airlines - Complaint - Lack of a decision from the Commission)
   2013/C 225/26
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, D. Grespan and S. Noë, acting as Agents)
   
      Other parties to the proceedings: Ryanair Ltd (represented by: E. Vahida, avocat, and I.-G. Metaxas-Maragkidis, dikigoros), Air One SpA (represented by: M. Merola, M.C. Santacroce and G. Belotti, avvocati)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) of 29 September 2011 in Case T-442/07 Ryanair v Commission upholding in part an action for failure to act seeking a finding that the Commission had unlawfully failed to adopt a decision on Ryanair’s complaints concerning aid allegedly granted by Italy to Alitalia, Air One and Meridiana in the form of various measures granting advantages to those companies
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the appeal;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.