CELEX: 62016TA0692
Language: en
Date: 2017-12-13 00:00:00
Title: Case T-692/16: Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — CJ v ECDC (Civil service — Members of the contract staff — Fixed-term contract — Article 47(b) of the CEOS — Annulment of early termination decision — Article 266 TFEU — Compliance with a judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal — Adoption of new early termination decision — Retroactive effect)

5.2.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 42/21
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — CJ v ECDC
   (Case T-692/16) (1)
   
   ((Civil service - Members of the contract staff - Fixed-term contract - Article 47(b) of the CEOS - Annulment of early termination decision - Article 266 TFEU - Compliance with a judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal - Adoption of new early termination decision - Retroactive effect))
   (2018/C 042/29)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: CJ (represented by: V. Kolias, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) (represented by J. Mannheim and A. Daume, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought under Article 270 TFEU seeking, on the one hand, the annulment, first, of the ECDC decision of 2 December 2015 terminating, with retroactive effect as from 30 April 2012, the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff and, secondly, of the ECDC decision of 27 June 2016 rejecting the complaint lodged by the applicant against that termination decision and, on the other hand, compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by the applicant.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders CJ to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.