CELEX: C2005/106/15
Language: en
Date: 2005-04-30 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 3 March 2005 in Case C-90/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Article 7(1) of Directive 1999/32/EC — Failure to supply the report relating to the sulphur content of liquid fuels used on its national territory)

30.4.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 106/8
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
   
   (Fifth Chamber)
   of 3 March 2005
   in Case C-90/04: Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria (1)
   
   (Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Article 7(1) of Directive 1999/32/EC - Failure to supply the report relating to the sulphur content of liquid fuels used on its national territory)
   (2005/C 106/15)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case C-90/04: Action for failure to fulfil obligations under Article 226 EC, brought on 23 February 2004 — Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Schieferer and G. Valero Jordana) v Republic of Austria (Agent: E. Riedl) –the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, J. Makarczyk (Rapporteur) and P. Kūris, Judges; P. Léger, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, gave a judgment on 3 March 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Declares that, by failing to supply to the Commission of the European Communities, before 30 June 2002, the report for 2001, the Republic of Austria has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(1) of Council Directive 1999/32/EC of 26 April 1999 relating to a reduction in the sulphur content of certain liquid fuels and amending Directive 93/12/EEC;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the Republic of Austria to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 94 of 17.04.2004.