CELEX: 62013CN0173
Language: en
Date: 2013-04-09 00:00:00
Title: Case C-173/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Lyon (France) lodged on 9 April 2013 — Maurice Leone, Blandine Leone v Garde des Sceaux, Ministre de la Justice, Caisse nationale de retraite des agents des collectivités locales

15.6.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 171/20
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour administrative d’appel de Lyon (France) lodged on 9 April 2013 — Maurice Leone, Blandine Leone v Garde des Sceaux, Ministre de la Justice, Caisse nationale de retraite des agents des collectivités locales
   (Case C-173/13)
   2013/C 171/40
   Language of the case: French
   
      Referring court
   
   Cour administrative d’appel de Lyon
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicants: Maurice Leone, Blandine Leone
   
      Defendants: Garde des Sceaux, Ministre de la Justice, Caisse nationale de retraite des agents des collectivités locale
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Do Article L. 24 and Article R. 37, read in conjunction, of the Civil and Military Retirement Pensions Code, as amended by the Finance (Amendment) Law No 2004-1485 of 30 December 2004 and by Decree No 2005-449 of 10 May 2005, indirectly discriminate between men and women, within the meaning of Article 157 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Does Article 15 of Decree 2003-1306 of 26 December 2003 on the retirement scheme for civil servants affiliated to the Caisse nationale de retraites des agents des collectivités locales indirectly discriminate between men and women, within the meaning of Article 157 of the Treaty of the Functioning of the European Union?
            
         
               3.
            
            
               In the event that one of the first two questions is answered in the affirmative, can such indirect discrimination be justified on the basis of Article 157(4) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?