CELEX: 62013CA0206
Language: en
Date: 2014-03-06 00:00:00
Title: Case C-206/13: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia (Italy)) — Cruciano Siragusa v Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — General principles of EU law — Implementation of EU law — Scope of EU law — A sufficient connection — Lack of such a connection — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

28.4.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 129/6
            
         Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia (Italy)) — Cruciano Siragusa v Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo
   (Case C-206/13) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - General principles of EU law - Implementation of EU law - Scope of EU law - A sufficient connection - Lack of such a connection - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court))
   2014/C 129/07
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Referring court
   
   Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Cruciano Siragusa
   
      Defendant: Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo
   
      Re:
   
   Request for a preliminary ruling — Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia — Interpretation of Article 17(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights — Principle of proportionality — National legislation under which any alterations made by the owner to property in an area of scenic interest are conditional upon prior clearance being granted — Obligation, in the absence of such clearance, to demolish the building, even where the owner shows afterwards that the alteration has no adverse effect on the scenery or landscape.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court of Justice of the European Union has no jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia (Italy).
   
      (1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.