CELEX: 62017CN0113
Language: en
Date: 2017-03-06 00:00:00
Title: Case C-113/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovak Republic) lodged on 6 March 2017 — QJ v Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky, Migračný úrad

29.5.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 168/23
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky (Slovak Republic) lodged on 6 March 2017 — QJ v Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky, Migračný úrad
   (Case C-113/17)
   (2017/C 168/30)
   Language of the case: Slovak
   
      Referring court
   
   Najvyšší súd Slovenskej republiky
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Appellant: QJ
   
      Respondent: Ministerstvo vnútra Slovenskej republiky, Migračný úrad
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Must Article 46(3) of Directive 2013/32/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast) (‘the Procedures Directive’) be interpreted to the effect that a national court deciding on the merits of an applicant’s need for international protection may, on the grounds that a negative decision has been repeatedly set aside and the case referred back to an administrative body on the basis of a repeatedly successful appeal, which has thus been shown to be ineffective, decide itself to grant such protection to the applicant, even if it does not have such competence under national law?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               If the answer to the first question is in the affirmative, does an appellate court competent to hear appeals concerning points of fact and law (the Najvyšší súd (Supreme Court) (Slovak Republic)) also have such jurisdiction?
            
         
      (1)  OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60.