CELEX: 62007FJ0131
Language: en
Date: 2008-12-02
Title: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 2 December 2008. # Barbora Baniel-Kubinova and Others v European Parliament. # Public service. # Case F-131/07.

JUDGMENT OF THE CIVIL SERVICE TRIBUNAL 
      (First Chamber)
      2 December 2008 
      Case F-131/07
      Barbora Baniel-Kubinova and Others
      v
      European Parliament
      (Civil service – Members of the temporary staff and members of the auxiliary staff appointed probationary officials – Article 10 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations – Right to the daily allowance after receiving part of the installation allowance)
      Application: brought under Articles 236 EC and 152 EA, in which Ms Baniel-Kubinova and 13 other Parliament officials seek annulment of
         the Parliament’s decisions refusing to grant them the daily allowance referred to in Article 10 of Annex VII to the Staff
         Regulations.
      
      Held: The action is dismissed. Each party is to bear its own costs.
      
      Summary
      1.      Officials – Reimbursement of expenses – Installation allowance – Members of the temporary staff
      (Staff Regulations, Annex VII, Art. 5(1); Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, Art. 24)
      2.      Officials – Reimbursement of expenses – Daily subsistence allowance – Conditions for granting – Probationary official who
            has received the installation allowance as a member of the temporary staff – Not included
      (Staff Regulations, Art. 71; Annex VII, Arts 5 and 10; Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, Art. 24(1))
      1.      The Community legislature provides, in Article 24 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants, for members of the temporary
         staff to receive an installation allowance, on the assumption that, even without the security of tenure of an established
         official, temporary staff with an expected period of service of at least one year may wish to settle at their place of employment
         on a permanent and lasting basis. It is in order to cover the costs resulting from the effort made to settle that the installation
         allowance is paid to temporary staff, albeit only in part where the expected period of service is less than three years.
      
      (see para. 20)
      2.      It is clear from a simple comparison of Articles 5 and 10 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations that a person who has received
         the installation allowance as a member of the temporary staff under Article 24(1) of the Conditions of Employment of Other
         Servants may not subsequently claim the daily subsistence allowance when appointed as a probationary official, regardless
         of the change in his status under the Staff Regulations. In so far as the grant of the installation allowance is conditional
         on the person transferring his residence to his place of employment, he cannot reasonably claim subsequently, in order to
         obtain a further financial benefit such as the daily subsistence allowance, that he was only provisionally settled at his
         place of employment, and that his ‘real’ residence was in his country of origin.
      
      Since, in order to obtain the installation allowance, the staff member concerned gave a declaration on his honour that his
         residence was located at his place of employment, and attached the relevant supporting documents to that declaration, the
         administration is entitled, for reasons relating to the relationship of trust that must exist between an institution and its
         officials, as well as for reasons of sound administration, not to review the question of the staff member’s residence when
         he applies for the grant of the daily subsistence allowance.
      
      (see paras 27, 30)