CELEX: C2003/112/89
Language: en
Date: 2003-05-10 00:00:00
Title: Removal from the register of Case T-100/99

C 112/48                 EN                     Official Journal of the European Union                                   10.5.2003
Pleas in law and main arguments                                               assessor which were favorable to the applicant were
                                                                              removed.
The applicant puts forward two pleas in law in support of his
application.
—     Breach of the obligation as to circumspection, of the
      principles of proper administraion and sound manage-
      ment and of the principles of independence and impar-                     Removal from the register of Case T-100/99 (1)
      tiality. It is claimed that the contested staff report was
      drawn up by a head of unit whose appointment was                                          (2003/C 112/89)
      challenged by the applicant before the Court of First
      Instance. The applicant submits that in those circum-                                (Language of the Case: Dutch)
      stances that assessor should have disqualified himself.
—     Breach of the obligation to state reasons, of rights of
      defence and of Article 26 of the Staff Regulations and            By order of 25 February 2003 the President of the Second
      manifest error of assessment. In this plea the applicant          Chamber of the Court of First Instance of the European
                                                                        Communities ordered the removal from the register of Case
      claims that the contested report was drawn up on the
      basis of statements by unidentified persons who did not           T-100/99: Campina Melkunie B.V. v Commission of the
      sign it, that the assessors did not consult the persons           European Communities.
      proposed by the applicant and that the second assessor
      gave no explanation as to why assessments by the first            (1 ) OJ C 246 of 28.8.1999.