CELEX: C2002/017/21
Language: en
Date: 2002-01-19 00:00:00
Title: Order of the President of the Court of First Instance of 5 September 2001 in Case T-74/00 R: Artegodan GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (Proceedings for interim relief — Article 108 of the Rules of Procedure — Change in circumstances — No change)

C 17/12               EN                    Official Journal of the European Communities                                         19.1.2002
                                                       COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                             statement of formation of the ‘Groupe technique des députés
                                                                       indépendants (TDI) — Groupe mixte’, — the Court of First
                                                                       Instance (Third Chamber, Extended Composition), composed
                      of 2 October 2001                                of J. Azizi, President, K. Lenaerts, R.M. Moura Ramos, M. Jaeger
                                                                       and M. Vilaras, Judges; J. Palacio González, Administrator, for
                                                                       the Registrar, has given a judgment on 2 October 2001, in
in Joined Cases T-222/99, T-327/99 and T-329/99: Jean-                 which it:
  Claude Martinez and Others v European Parliament (1)
                                                                       1.    Ordered the joinder of Cases T-222/99, T-327/99 and
                                                                             T-329/99 for the purposes of the judgment;
(Actions for annulment — Act of the European Parliament
concerning a provision of its Rules of Procedure — Statement
                                                                       2.    Dismissed the actions;
of formation of a group under Rule 29 of the Rules of
Procedure of the European Parliament — Admissibility —
Objection of illegality — Equal treatment — Observance                 3.    Ordered the applicants in each case to bear their own costs and
of fundamental rights — Principles of democracy and                          those incurred by the Parliament including, as regards Case
proportionality — Freedom of association — Protection of                     T-222/99, the costs relating to the application for interim
legitimate expectations — Parliamentary traditions of the                    measures.
Member States — Breach of essential procedural require-
                ments — Misuse of procedure)
                                                                       (1) OJ C 366 of 18.12.1999, C 47 of 19.2.2000 and C 63 of
                                                                           4.3.2000.
                        (2002/C 17/20)
            (Language of the case: French and Italian)
                                                                       ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
                                                                                                   INSTANCE
In Joined Cases T-222/99: Jean-Claude Martinez, Member of
the European Parliament, residing in Montpellier (France),
Charles de Gaulle, Member of the European Parliament,                                         of 5 September 2001
residing in Paris (France), represented by F. Wagner, lawyer,
applicants in Case T-327/99, Front national, established in
Saint-Cloud (France), represented by A. Nivière, lawyer, and           in Case T-74/00 R: Artegodan GmbH v Commission of
T-329/99, Emma Bonino, Member of the European Parliament,                                 the European Communities
residing in Rome (Italy), Marco Pannella, Member of the
European Parliament, residing in Rome, Marco Cappato,                  (Proceedings for interim relief — Article 108 of the Rules of
Member of the European Parliament, residing in Vedano al                   Procedure — Change in circumstances — No change)
Lambro (Italy), Gianfranco Dell’Alba, Member of the European
Parliament, residing in Leghorn (Italy), Benedetto Della Vedova,
Member of the European Parliament, residing in Tirano (Italy),                                   (2002/C 17/21)
Olivier Dupuis, Member of the European Parliament, residing
in Rome, Maurizio Turco, Member of the European Parliament,
residing in Pulsano (Italy), Lista Emma Bonino, established in                             (Language of the case: German)
Rome, represented initially by A. Tizzano and G. M. Roberti,
lawyers, and subsequently by G. M. Roberti, against European
Parliament (Agents: G. Garzón Clariana, J. Schoo, H. Krück
and A. Caiola) — application for the annulment in Case                 In Case T-74/00 R: Artegodan GmbH, established in Lüchow
T-222/99 of the European Parliament’s decision of 14 Septem-           (Germany), represented by U. Doepner, lawyer, with an
ber 1999 on the interpretation of Rule 29(1) of the Rules of           address for service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the
Procedure of the European Parliament; in Case T-327/99 of              European Communities (Agents: H. Støvlbæk and B. Wägen-
the European Parliament’s decision of 14 September 1999                baur) — application by the defendant under Article 108 of the
dissolving with retroactive effect the ‘Groupe technique des           Rules of Procedure of the Court of First Instance for cancel-
députés indépendants (TDI) — Groupe mixte’; and in Case                lation of the order of the President of Court of First Instance
T-329/99 of the European Parliament’s decision of 14 Septem-           of 28 June 2000 in Case T-74/00 R Artegodan v Commission
ber 1999 in which it adopted the view taken by the Committee           [2000] ECR II-2583 — the President of the Court of First
on Constitutional Affairs on the conformity with Rule 29 of            Instance made an order on 5 September 2001, the operative
the Rules of Procedure of the European Parliament of the               part of which is as follows:
 ---pagebreak--- 19.1.2002               EN                     Official Journal of the European Communities                                         C 17/13
1.    The Commission’s application is dismissed.                          Murphy, Solicitor, against the Commission of the European
                                                                          Communities (Agents: P. Oliver) — application for interim
2.    Costs are reserved.                                                 measures in connection with an action under Article 230 EC
                                                                          for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 12 January
                                                                          2001 rejecting the applicant’s complaint concerning the
                                                                          alleged infringement of Articles 81 and 82 EC by the General
                                                                          Council of the Bar of England and Wales, the President of the
                                                                          Court of First Instance made an order on 29 March 2001, the
ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST                              operative part of which is as follows:
                              INSTANCE
                                                                          1.    The application for interim measures is dismissed.
                          of 29 March 2001
in Case T-302/00 R: Anthony Goldstein v Commission of                     2.    The costs are reserved.
                   the European Communities
 (Action for interim measures — Admissibility — Urgency)
                           (2002/C 17/22)
                    (Language of the case: English)
                                                                                ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
In Case T-302/00 R: Anthony Goldstein, residing at Harrow,                                         of 3 October 2001
Middlesex (United Kingdom), represented by R. St. John
Murphy, Solicitor, against the Commission of the European
Communities (Agents: P. Oliver and R. Lyal) — application                 in Case T-60/01: Marie-Josée Bollendorff v European
for interim measures in connection with an action under                                               Parliament (1)
Article 230 EC for annulment of the Commission’s decision of
7 July 2000 rejecting the applicant’s complaint concerning the            (Action for annulment — Withdrawal of the contested
alleged infringement of Articles 81 and 82 EC by the General                             measure — No need to adjudicate)
Medical Council — the President of the Court of First Instance
made an order on 29 March 2001, the operative part of which
is as follows:                                                                                       (2002/C 17/24)
1.    The application for interim measures is dismissed.
                                                                                              (Language of the case: French)
2.    The costs are reserved.
                                                                          In Case T-60/01: Marie-Josée Bollendorff, residing in Luxem-
                                                                          bourg, represented by L. Mosar, lawyer, with an address for
                                                                          service in Luxembourg, against European Parliament (Agents:
ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST                              Y. Pantalis and D. Moore) — application for annulment of the
                              INSTANCE                                    decision of the Parliament to regard as irregular the absence of
                                                                          the applicant from 21 March 2000 to 30 April 2000 and to
                                                                          deduct that absence from her annual leave entitlement —
                          of 29 March 2001                                the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of
                                                                          B. Vesterdorf, President, N.J. Forwood and H. Legal, Judges;
in Case T-18/01 R: Anthony Goldstein v Commission of                      H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 3 October 2001, the
                   the European Communities                               operative part of which is as follows:
(Application for interim measures — Admissibility —
                               Urgency)                                   1.    There is no need to adjudicate in the present case.
                           (2002/C 17/23)                                 2.    The Parliament shall bear the entire costs.
                    (Language of the case: English)
                                                                          (1) OJ 2001 C 173.
In Case T-18/01 R: Anthony Goldstein, residing at Harrow,
Middlesex (United Kingdom), represented by R. St. John