CELEX: 62016TA0748
Language: en
Date: 2019-05-02 00:00:00
Title: Case T-748/16: Judgment of the General Court of 2 May 2019 — QH v Parliament (Civil service — Members of the temporary staff — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Request for assistance — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Psychological harassment — Decision rejecting the request for assistance — Principles of objectivity and impartiality — Right to good administration — Right to be heard)

24.6.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 213/26
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 2 May 2019 — QH v Parliament
      (Case T-748/16) (1)
      
      (Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Request for assistance - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Psychological harassment - Decision rejecting the request for assistance - Principles of objectivity and impartiality - Right to good administration - Right to be heard)
      (2019/C 213/24)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: QH (represented initially by N. Lhoëst and S. Michiels, and subsequently by N. Lhoëst, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and Í. Ní Riagáin Düro, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Parliament of 26 January 2016 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment of that institution rejected the request for assistance made by the applicant on 11 December 2014 and the decision of 12 July 2016 by which the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment rejected the applicant’s claim and, secondly, compensation for the loss he allegedly suffered as a result of the unlawful conduct of that authority when processing that request for assistance.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     Annuls the European Parliament’s decision of 26 January 2016 rejecting his request for assistance, as confirmed by the decision of 12 July 2016 rejecting his claim;
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     Dismisses the claim as to the remainder;
                  
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  
                     Declares that the parties are to bear their own costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.