CELEX: 62014TA0049
Language: en
Date: 2015-10-07 00:00:00
Title: Case T-49/14: Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Zentralverband des Deutschen Bäckerhandwerks vCommission (Protected geographical indication — ‘Kołocz śląski’ or ‘Kołacz śląski’ — Cancellation proceedings — Legal base — Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 — Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 — Grounds for cancellation — Fundamental rights

30.11.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 398/41
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 7 October 2015 — Zentralverband des Deutschen Bäckerhandwerks vCommission
   (Case T-49/14) (1)
   
   ((Protected geographical indication - ‘Kołocz śląski’ or ‘Kołacz śląski’ - Cancellation proceedings - Legal base - Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Grounds for cancellation - Fundamental rights)
   (2015/C 398/51)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Zentralverband des Deutschen Bäckerhandwerks eV (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: I. Jung, M. Teworte-Vey, A. Renvert and J. Saatkamp, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Guillem Carrau and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action for the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision of 14 November 2013 concerning the rejection of a request to cancel a name entered in the register of protected designations of origin and protected geographical indications provided for in Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council (Kołocz śląski/kołacz śląski (PGI)) (OJ 2013 L 306, p. 40).
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1)
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2)
            
            
               Orders Zentralverband des Deutschen Bäckerhandwerks eV to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 112, 14.4.2014.