CELEX: 62007TA0034
Language: en
Date: 2010-01-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-34/07: Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2010 — Goncharov v OHIM — DSB (DSBW) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark DSBW — Earlier Community word mark DSB — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

13.3.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 63/46
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 21 January 2010 — Goncharov v OHIM — DSB (DSBW)
   (Case T-34/07) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark DSBW - Earlier Community word mark DSB - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   2010/C 63/80
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Karen Goncharov (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: G. Hasselblatt and A. Späth, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: initially A. Poch and subsequently B. Schmidt, acting as Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: DSB (Copenhagen, Denmark) (represented by: F. González Diáz and T. Graf, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2006 (Case R 1330/2005-2), relating to opposition proceedings between DSB and Mr K. Goncharov
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Mr Karen Goncharov to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 82, 14.4.2007.