CELEX: C2005/057/36
Language: en
Date: 2005-03-05 00:00:00
Title: Case C-1/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Utlänningsnämnden by order of that court of 30 December 2004, received at the Court Registry on 4 January 2005, in the case of Yunying Jia against Migrationsverket

5.3.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 57/22
            
         Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Utlänningsnämnden by order of that court of 30 December 2004, received at the Court Registry on 4 January 2005, in the case of Yunying Jia against Migrationsverket
   (Case C-1/05)
   (2005/C 57/36)
   Language of the case: Swedish
   Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Utlänningsnämnden (Alien Appeals Board) (Sweden) of 30 December 2004, received at the Court Registry on 4 January 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the case of Yunying Jia against Migrationsverket (Immigration Board) on the following questions:
   
               1
            
            
               
                           a.
                        
                        
                           In the light of the judgment in Case C-109/01, is Article 10 of Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 to be interpreted as meaning that a national of a non-Member State related to a worker as specified therein must be lawfully within the Community in order to have the right permanently to reside with the worker – and, in the same way, is Article 1 of Directive 73/148/EEC to be interpreted as meaning that the right to permanent residence of a relative of a citizen of the Union, who is a national of a non-Member State, presupposes that the national of a non-Member State is lawfully resident in the Community?
                        
                     
                           b.
                        
                        
                           If Directive 73/148/EEC is to be interpreted as meaning that lawful residence within the Community is a requirement in order for a relative of a citizen of the Union, who is a national of a non-Member State, to be able to claim the right to permanent residence under the directive, does that then imply that the relative is to hold a current residence permit valid for or intended to lead to permanent residence in one of the Member States? If there is no permanent residence permit is a residence permit granted on other grounds for a shorter or longer stay sufficient, or is it, as in the case pending before the Utlänningsnämnden, sufficient if the relative applying for a residence permit holds a valid visa?
                        
                     
                           c.
                        
                        
                           If a relative of a citizen of the Union, who is a national of a non-Member State, cannot benefit from the right to permanent residence under Directive 73/148/EEC because he is not lawfully resident in the Community, does a refusal to grant a relative a residence permit for permanent residence thus restrict the right of the citizen of the Union to freedom of establishment under Article 43 EC?
                        
                     
                           d.
                        
                        
                           If a relative of a citizen of the Union, who is a national of a non-Member State, cannot benefit from the right to permanent residence under Directive 73/148/EEC because he is not lawfully resident in the Community, is the right of the citizen of the Union to freedom of establishment under Article 43 EC restricted if the relatives of the citizen of the Union are deported because an application for a national residence permit cannot be accepted after entry into Sweden?
                        
                     
         
               2
            
            
               
                           a.
                        
                        
                           Is Article 1(d) of Directive 73/148/EEC to be interpreted as meaning that ‘dependence’ means that a relative of a citizen of the Union is economically dependent on the citizen of the Union to attain the lowest acceptable standard of living in his country of origin or country where he is normally resident?
                        
                     
                           b.
                        
                        
                           Is Article 6(b) of Directive 73/148/EEC to be interpreted as meaning that the Member States may require a relative of a citizen of the Union who claims to be dependent on the citizen of the Union or his/her spouse to produce documents, in addition to the undertaking given by the citizen of the Union, which prove that there is a factual situation of dependence?