CELEX: C2005/205/35
Language: en
Date: 2005-08-20 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 June 2005 in Case T-7/04 Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Application for figurative Community trade mark Limoncello della Costiera Amalfitana shaker — Earlier national word mark LIMONCHELO — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

20.8.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 205/20
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 15 June 2005
   in Case T-7/04 Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Application for figurative Community trade mark Limoncello della Costiera Amalfitana shaker - Earlier national word mark LIMONCHELO - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2005/C 205/35)
   Language of the case: Italian
   In Case T-7/04: Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas, established in Vietri sul Mare (Italy), represented by F. Sciaudone, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (agent: M. Capostagno), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM having been Limiñana y Botella, SL, established in Monforte del Cid (Spain), action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 October 2003 (Case R 933/ 2002-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Limiñana y Botella, SL and Shaker di L. Laudato & C. Sas, the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of M. Jaeger, President, J. Azizi and E. Cremona, Judges; B. Pastor, Deputy Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 June 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 24 October 2003 (Case R 933/2002-2) and alters it so that the appeal brought before OHIM by the applicant is well founded and consequently the opposition must be rejected;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 59 of 6.3.2004.