CELEX: C2005/193/45
Language: en
Date: 2005-08-06 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 9 June 2005 in Case T-80/04 Jean-Pierre Castets v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Invalidity — Compensation for leave not taken — Number of days taken into account for the purpose of calculating compensation — Reasons not attributable to the requirements of the service)

6.8.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 193/27
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 9 June 2005
   in Case T-80/04 Jean-Pierre Castets v Commission of the European Communities (1)
   
   (Officials - Invalidity - Compensation for leave not taken - Number of days taken into account for the purpose of calculating compensation - Reasons not attributable to the requirements of the service)
   (2005/C 193/45)
   Language of the case: French
   In Case T-80/04: Jean-Pierre Castets, a former official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Saint-Victor-des-Oules (France), represented by G. Crétin, lawyer, against the Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and V. Joris, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for annulment of the decision of the Commission fixing the amount of compensation for annual leave not taken by the applicant at the time of leaving the service, insofar as the compensation calculation is a result of the fact that the amount of leave which may be carried over is limited to twelve days per calendar year — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska-Białecka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, gave a judgment on 9 June 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the parties to bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 94 of 17.4.2004.