CELEX: 62015TN0680
Language: en
Date: 2015-11-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-680/15: Action brought on 20 November 2015 — Les Éclaires v OHIM — L’éclaireur International (L’ECLAIREUR)

1.2.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 38/66
            
         Action brought on 20 November 2015 — Les Éclaires v OHIM — L’éclaireur International (L’ECLAIREUR)
   (Case T-680/15)
   (2016/C 038/89)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Les Éclaires GmbH (Nürnberg, Germany) (represented by: S. Bund, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: L’éclaireur International (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘L’ECLAIREUR’ — Community trade mark No 3 494 028
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2015 in Case R 2266/2014-1
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 15(1) Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Discordance with the Guidelines for Examination of the OHIM Part C Section 6.