CELEX: 62007TA0486
Language: en
Date: 2011-03-22 00:00:00
Title: Case T-486/07: Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2011 — Ford Motor v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for figurative Community trade mark CA — Earlier Community word and figurative marks KA — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

7.5.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 139/16
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2011 — Ford Motor v OHIM
   (Case T-486/07) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for figurative Community trade mark CA - Earlier Community word and figurative marks KA - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2011/C 139/30
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Ford Motor Company (Dearborn, Michigan, United States) (represented by: R. Ingerl, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Alkar Automotive, SA (Derio, Spain) (represented by: S. Alsonso Maruri, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Chamber of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 October 2007 (Case R 85/2006-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Ford Motor Company and Alkar Automotive, SA.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Ford Motor Company to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 51, 23.2.2008.