CELEX: C2007/170/42
Language: en
Date: 2007-07-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-167/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 June 2007 — Grether v OHIM — Crisgo (FENNEL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the figurative Community trade mark FENNEL — Earlier Community word mark FENJAL — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b), Article 73, second sentence, and Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

21.7.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 170/22
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 13 June 2007 — Grether v OHIM — Crisgo (FENNEL)
   (Case T-167/05) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative Community trade mark FENNEL - Earlier Community word mark FENJAL - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b), Article 73, second sentence, and Article 74(1) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2007/C 170/42)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Grether AG (Binningen, Switzerland) (represented by: initially, V. von Bomhard, A. Pohlmann and A. Renck, and subsequently, V. von Bomhard, A. Pohlmann and T. Dolde, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Crisgo (Thailand) Co. Ltd (Samutsakom, Thailand) (represented by: A. Bensoussan, M. Haas and L. Tellier-Loniewski, lawyers)
   Re:
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Chamber of the Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 October 2004 (Case R 250/2002-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Grether AG and Crisgo (Thailand) Co. Ltd.
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               orders the applicant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 182, 23.7.2005.