CELEX: C2005/193/36
Language: en
Date: 2005-08-06 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 31 May 2005 in Case T-284/02 Triantafyllia Dionyssopoulou v Council of the European Union (Officials — Promotion — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Consideration of comparative merits — Taking into account of the actual duties performed during the reference period — Taking into account of age and seniority — Action for annulment — Action for compensation)

6.8.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 193/23
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 31 May 2005
   in Case T-284/02 Triantafyllia Dionyssopoulou v Council of the European Union (1)
   
   (Officials - Promotion - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Consideration of comparative merits - Taking into account of the actual duties performed during the reference period - Taking into account of age and seniority - Action for annulment - Action for compensation)
   (2005/C 193/36)
   Language of the case: French
   In Case T-284/02: Triantafyllia Dionyssopoulou, a former official of the Council of the European Union, residing in Brussels (Belgium), represented by J. Martin, lawyer, against Council of the European Union (Agents: M. Sims and F. Anton) — application, firstly, for annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to Grade C2 in the 2001 promotion procedure and, secondly, for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that decision — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of J.D. Cooke, President, R. García-Valdecasas and I. Labucka, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 31 May 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the application;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the parties to bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 289 of 23.11.2002.