CELEX: 62011CN0316
Language: en
Date: 2011-06-22 00:00:00
Title: Case C-316/11 P: Appeal brought on 22 June 2011 by Longevity Health Products, Inc. against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 15/04/2011 in Case T-96/11: Longevity Health Products, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

10.9.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 269/28
            
         Appeal brought on 22 June 2011 by Longevity Health Products, Inc. against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 15/04/2011 in Case T-96/11: Longevity Health Products, Inc. v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   (Case C-316/11 P)
   2011/C 269/52
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (represented by: J. Korab, Rechtsanwalt)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Admit the complaint filed by the company Longevity Health Products, Inc.;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the General Court of April 15, 2011, T-96/11;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The applicant submits that the contested order should be annulled on the following grounds:
   
               —
            
            
               The reasoning of the General Court is defective;
            
         
               —
            
            
               The General Court did not consider the arguments advanced by the holder of the trade mark.