CELEX: C2007/140/39
Language: en
Date: 2007-06-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-387/04: Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 2007 — EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg v Commission (Annulment — Directive 2003/87/EC — Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading — National plan for allocation of emission quotas for Germany — State aid — Legal interest in bringing proceedings — Inadmissibility)

23.6.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 140/23
            
         Order of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 2007 — EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg v Commission
   (Case T-387/04) (1)
   
   (Annulment - Directive 2003/87/EC - Greenhouse gas emission allowance trading - National plan for allocation of emission quotas for Germany - State aid - Legal interest in bringing proceedings - Inadmissibility)
   (2007/C 140/39)
   Language of the case: German
   Parties
   
      Applicant: EnBW Energie Baden-Württemberg (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: C.-D. Ehlermann, M. Seyfarth, A. Gutermuth and M. Wissmann, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: U. Wölker, M. Niejahr and T. Scharf, acting as Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the form of order sought by the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: W.-D. Plessing and U. Forsthoff, Agents, and D. Sellner and U. Karpenstein, lawyers)
   Re:
   Application for annulment of Commission Decision C (2004) 2515/2 final of 7 July 2004 on the national plan for the allocation of greenhouse gas emission allowances, communicated by Germany in accordance with Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC (OJ 2003 L 275, p. 32).
   Operative part of the order
   
               1.
            
            
               The application is dismissed as inadmissible;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those of the defendant;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The intervener shall bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 6, 8.1.2005.