CELEX: 62019TB0074
Language: en
Date: 2019-12-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-74/19: Order of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — DK Company v EUIPO — Hunter Boot (DENIM HUNTER) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark DENIM HUNTER — Revocation of the contested decision — Action which has become devoid of purpose — No need to adjudicate)

24.2.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 61/41
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 19 December 2019 — DK Company v EUIPO — Hunter Boot (DENIM HUNTER)
      (Case T-74/19) (1)
      
      (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark DENIM HUNTER - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate)
      (2020/C 61/52)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: DK Company A/S (Ikast, Denmark) (represented by: S. Hansen, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Markakis, acting as Agent)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Hunter Boot (Edinburgh, United Kingdom)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2018 (Case R 849/2018-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Hunter Boot and DK Company.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall pay the costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 112, 25.3.2019.