CELEX: 62020TN0736
Language: en
Date: 2020-12-11 00:00:00
Title: Case T-736/20: Action brought on 11 December 2020 — OP v Commission

8.3.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 79/31
            
         
      Action brought on 11 December 2020 — OP v Commission
      (Case T-736/20)
      (2021/C 79/41)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: OP (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Commission
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul i) the decision of the Selection Board of 5 February 2020, by which the applicant was not placed on the reserve list of Open Competition EPSO/AST/147/19 and ii) the decision of the Appointing Authority of 3 September 2020, by which the complaint of the applicant against the decision of the Selection Board of 5 February 2020 was rejected, to the extent it contains additional reasoning;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to bear its costs as well as the applicant’s costs for the current proceedings.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging infringement of the principles of equal treatment, transparency, objectivity and of Article 1d(5) of the Staff Regulations.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to good administration.
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Third plea in law, alleging insufficient and inadequate reasoning.
               
            
                  4.
               
               
                  Fourth plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 27 of the Staff Regulations.