CELEX: 62013CN0449
Language: en
Date: 2013-08-12 00:00:00
Title: Case C-449/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance d’Orléans (France) lodged on 12 August 2013 — CA Consumer Finance v Ingrid Bakkaus and Others

26.10.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 313/11
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance d’Orléans (France) lodged on 12 August 2013 — CA Consumer Finance v Ingrid Bakkaus and Others
   (Case C-449/13)
   2013/C 313/20
   Language of the case: French
   
      Referring court
   
   Tribunal d’instance d’Orléans
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: CA Consumer Finance
   
      Defendants: Ingrid Bakkaus, Charline Bonato, née Savary, Florian Bonato
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Must Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers be interpreted as meaning that the onus is on creditors to prove that they have correctly and fully performed their obligations under the national law transposing the directive when a credit agreement is entered into and performed?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Does Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers preclude a creditor from being able to prove that it has performed its obligations correctly and in full solely by means of a standard term in the credit agreement, whereby the consumer acknowledges the performance of those obligations, without that term being supported by documents issued by the creditor and supplied to the borrower?
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Must Article 8 of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements (1) be interpreted as precluding the creditworthiness check from being carried out solely on the basis of information supplied by the consumer, without such information being effectively scrutinised against other evidence?
            
         
               4.
            
            
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           Must Article 5(6) of Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements be interpreted as meaning that it is not possible for a creditor to provide adequate explanations to the consumer if it has not checked the consumer’s financial situation and needs beforehand?
                        
                     
                           —
                        
                        
                           Must Article 5(6) of Directive 2008/48/EC be interpreted as precluding the adequate explanations to be supplied to the consumer being provided only in the contractual information mentioned in the credit agreement, without a specific document being drawn up?
                        
                     
         
      (1)  Directive 2008/48/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2008 on credit agreements for consumers and repealing Council Directive 87/102/EEC (OJ 2008 L 133, p. 66).