CELEX: 62019CA0620
Language: en
Date: 2020-12-10 00:00:00
Title: Case C-620/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v D.-H. T. acting as insolvency administrator in relation to the assets of J & S Service UG (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Personal data — Regulation (EU) 2016/679 — Article 23 — Restrictions to the data subject’s rights — Significant financial interest — Enforcement of civil law claims — National legislation referring to the provisions of EU law — Tax data concerning a legal entity — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

8.2.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 44/8
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 10 December 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Germany) — Land Nordrhein-Westfalen v D.-H. T. acting as insolvency administrator in relation to the assets of J & S Service UG
      (Case C-620/19) (1)
      
      (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Personal data - Regulation (EU) 2016/679 - Article 23 - Restrictions to the data subject’s rights - Significant financial interest - Enforcement of civil law claims - National legislation referring to the provisions of EU law - Tax data concerning a legal entity - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)
      (2021/C 44/10)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Referring court
      
      Bundesverwaltungsgericht
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Land Nordrhein-Westfalen
      
         Defendant: D.-H. T. acting as insolvency administrator in relation to the assets of J & S Service UG
      
         Interested party: Vertreter des Bundesinteresses beim Bundesverwaltungsgericht
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court of Justice does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions raised by the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Federal Administrative Court, Germany) in its decision of 4 July 2019.
      
         (1)  OJ C 383, 11.11.2019.