CELEX: C2006/131/48
Language: en
Date: 2006-06-03 00:00:00
Title: Case C-310/05: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of  9 March 2006  — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Directive 2001/95/EC — General product safety — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

3.6.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 131/27
            
         Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg
   (Case C-310/05) (1)
   
   (Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Directive 2001/95/EC - General product safety - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
   (2006/C 131/48)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M.-J. Jonczy and A. Aresu, acting as Agents)
   
      Defendant: Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg (represented by: S. Schreiner, acting as Agent)
   Re:
   Failure by a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the measures necessary to comply with Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety (OJ L 11, p. 4)
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Declares that, by failing to adopt the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Directive 2001/95/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3 December 2001 on general product safety, the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 21(1) of that directive;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the Grand-Duchy of Luxembourg to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 243 of 01.10.2005.