CELEX: C1995/248/16
Language: en
Date: 1995-09-23 00:00:00
Title: Action brought on 27 July 1995 by the Commission of the European Communities against the French Republic (Case C-256/95)

No C 248/8               EN                   Official Journal of the European Communities                                    23 . 9 . 95
2 . If so, is a provision of national law compatible with the                 — Commission Directive 93/48/EEC of 23 June 1993
      Community legislation referred to above which, where                        setting out the schedule indicating the conditions to
      there is a reduction in the heads of livestock raised                       be met by fruit plant propagating material and fruit
      during the intermediate period between the end of the                       plants intended for fruit production, pursuant to
      reference period and the beginning of the period of the                     Council Directive 92/34/EEC ( 4 ),
      undertaking, not only excludes those animals from the
      aid but also provides that they must be excluded from                   — Commission Directive 93/49/EEC of 23 June 1993
      the calculation of the minimum 20 % reduction in                            setting out the schedule indicating the conditions to
      output between the reference period and the period of                       be met by ornamental plant propagating material
      the undertaking, which is a prerequisite for the grant of                   and ornamental plants pursuant to Council
      the aid ( with the result, in particular, that the aid is not               Directive 91 /682/EEC ( 5 ),
      payable even in respect of the actual reduction in
       livestock envisaged in the period of the undertaking,                  — Commission Directive 93/61 /EEC of 23 June 1993
      where that reduction is less than 20 % of the average                       setting out the schedules indicating the conditions
       number of livestock raised in the reference period )?                      to be met by vegetable propagating and planting
                                                                                  material , other than seed pursuant to Council
f 1 ) OJ No L 93 , 30 . 3 . 1985 , p . 1 .                                        Directive 92/33/EEC ( 6 ),
( 2 ) OJ No L 106 , 27 . 4 . 1988 , p . 28 .
( 3 ) OJ No L 361 , 29 . 12 . 1988 , p . 13 .                                 and/or by failing to communicate them to the
                                                                              Commission, the French Republic has failed to fulfil its
                                                                              obligations under the penultimate articles of those
                                                                              Directives and under the EC Treaty;
                                                                         2 . order the French Republic to pay the costs .
Action brought on 27 July 1995 by the Commission of the
      European Communities against the French Republic                   The pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support are
                                                                         similar to those in Case C-252/95 ( 7 ); the deadlines for
                           ( Case C-256/95 )
                                                                         transposition into national law set by the Directives expired
                             ( 95/C 248/16 )                             on 1 January 1994 .
An action against the French Republic was brought before                 (>)  OJ No L 268 , 14 . 9 . 1992 , p . 35 .
the Court of Justice of the European Communities on                      (2 ) OJ No L 62 , 15 . 3 . 1993 , p. 38 .
27 July 1995 by the Commission of the European                           (3 ) OJ No L 62 , 15 . 3 . 1993 , p . 49 .
 Communities, represented by Gerard Rozet, acting as                     (4)  OJ No L 250 , 7. 10 . 1993 , p. 1 .
                                                                         (<)  OJ No L 250 , 7. 10 . 1993 , p. 9 .
Agent, with an address for service in Luxembourg at                      (*)  OJ No L 250 , 7 . 10 . 1993 , p. 19 .
the office of Mr Gomez de la Gruz, Wagner Centre,                        (7)  See p. 7 of this Official Journal .
 Kirchberg.
 The applicant claims that the Court should :
  1 . declare that, by failing to bring into force the laws,
        regulations and administrative provisions necessary to           Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal
       comply with                                                       Administratif de Clermont-Ferrand (2ème Chambre) by
                                                                         judgment of that court of 27 June 1 995 in the case of Gérard
       — Council Directive 92/45/EEC of 16 June 1992 on                  Bresle v. Préfet de la Région Auvergne and Préfet du
           public health and animal health problems relating to                                       Puy-de-Dôme
           the killing of wild game and the placing on the                                         ( Case C-257/95 )
           market of the wild-game meat ( ! ),
                                                                                                     ( 95/C 248/17 )
        — Council Directive 92/ 117/EEC of 17 December
            1992 concerning measures for protection against               Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
            specified zoonoses and specified zoonotic agents in          European Communities by a judgment of the Tribunal
            animals and products of animal origin in order to            Administratif Clermont-Ferrand              (2eme    Chambre)
            prevent outbreaks of food-borne infections and                ( Administrative Court of Clermont-Ferrand, Second
            intoxications (2 ),                                           Chamber) of 27 June 1995 , which was received at the Court
                                                                          Registry on 28 July 1995 , for a preliminary ruling in the case
        — Council Directive 92/ 118/EEC of 17 December                    of Gerard Bresle v. Prefet de la Region Auvergne ( Prefect of
            1992 laying down animal health and public health              the Auvergne Region) and Prefet du Puy-de-Dome (Prefect
            requirements governing trade in and imports into the          of Puy-de-Dome ) on the following question :
            Community of products not subject to the said
            requirements laid down in specific Community rules            Can the method of calculating the power-rating for
            referred to in Annex A ( I) to Directive 89/662/EEC           administrative purposes of vehicles under the Circular with
            and, as regards pathogens, to Directive                       retrospective statutory force of the Secretary of State for
            90/425/EEC ( 3 ),                                             Public Works, Transport and Tourism of 28 December