CELEX: 62016TN0315
Language: en
Date: 2016-06-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-315/16: Action brought on 20 June 2016 — Tamasu Butterfly Europa v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (Butterfly)

8.8.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 287/29
            
         Action brought on 20 June 2016 — Tamasu Butterfly Europa v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (Butterfly)
   (Case T-315/16)
   (2016/C 287/35)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Tamasu Butterfly Europa GmbH (Moers, Germany) (represented by: C. Röhl, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Butterfly’
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 March 2016 in Case R 221/2015-1
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Alter the contested decision to the effect that the opposition is upheld in its entirety and EU trade mark application No 011757549 is rejected;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the other party to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.