CELEX: 62019CN0708
Language: en
Date: 2019-09-25 00:00:00
Title: Case C-708/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 25 September 2019 — Von Aschenbach & Voss GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg

9.12.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 413/28
            
         
      Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 25 September 2019 — Von Aschenbach & Voss GmbH v Hauptzollamt Duisburg
      (Case C-708/19)
      (2019/C 413/34)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Referring court
      
      Finanzgericht Düsseldorf
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Von Aschenbach & Voss GmbH
      
         Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg
      
         Questions referred
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Is Article 1(1) of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/271 of 16 February 2017 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Council Regulation (EC) No 925/2009 on imports of certain aluminium foil originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of slightly modified certain aluminium foil (1) invalid because it infringes Article 13(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2016 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Union, (2) in that it extended to aluminium converter foil the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed in respect of aluminium household foil pursuant to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/2384 of 17 December 2015 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain aluminium foils originating in the People’s Republic of China and terminating the proceeding for imports of certain aluminium foils originating in Brazil following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (3) and provides for exemption for aluminium converter foil from anti-dumping duty only under the conditions of Article 1(4) of Implementing Regulation 2017/271?
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Is Article 1(1) of Implementing Regulation 2017/271 invalid because the Commission made a manifest error of assessment when adopting that regulation as adequate reasons are not stated for its assumption that 80 % of the products under investigation were slightly modified products?
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Is Article 1(1) of Implementing Regulation 2017/271 invalid because the Commission made a manifest error of assessment when adopting that regulation as it did not check the end use of the imported aluminium foil in the European Union?
               
            
         (1)  OJ 2017 L 40, p. 51.
      
         (2)  OJ 2016 L 176, p. 21.
      
         (3)  OJ 2015 L 332, p. 63.