CELEX: 52005PC0328
Language: cs
Date: 2005-07-20
Title: Návrh rozhodnutí Rady kterým se mění rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES o finančním příspěvku Společenství na programy kontroly rybolovu členských států

KOMISE EVROPSKÝCH SPOLEČENSTVÍ
                                              V Bruselu dne 20.7.2005
                                              KOM(2005)328 v konečném znění
                                              2005/0136(CNS)
                                      Návrh
                             ROZHODNUTÍ RADY
   kterým se mění rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES o finančním příspěvku Společenství na
                   programy kontroly rybolovu členských států
                                        .
                               (předložená Komisí)
CS                                                                             CS
 ---pagebreak---                                           ODŮVODNĚNÍ
   Společenství poskytuje členským státům finanční pomoc na kontrolu rybolovu od roku 1991.
   Tato politika je založena na skutečnosti, že kontrola rybolovu zahrnuje vysoké náklady, a to
   zejména na inspekce na moři prováděné s pomocí hlídkových plavidel a letadel a na investice
   do technologií a sítí informačních technologií.
   Vzhledem k těmto skutečnostem přijala Rada čtyři rozhodnutí, která stanoví podporu
   Společenství pro výdaje členských států v oblasti kontroly rybolovu: Rozhodnutí 89/631/EHS
   pro období 1991–1995, rozhodnutí 95/527/EHS pro období 1996–2000, rozhodnutí
   2001/431/ES pro období 2001–2003 a rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES pro období 2004 a 2005.
   Z analýzy výsledků tohoto režimu jasně vyplývá, že finanční pomoc, kterou Společenství
   členským státům poskytuje, má velmi pozitivní vliv na jejich kontrolní systémy.
   Platnost rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES končí dnem 31. prosince 2005 a nový finanční rámec pro
   oblast rybolovu (pro období 2007–2013) vstoupí v platnost až v roce 2007. Z tohoto důvodu
   je třeba prodloužit použitelnost stávajícího finančního režimu přijatého v souladu
   s rozhodnutím 2004/465/ES o jeden rok, aby podpora Společenství pro výdaje, které členské
   státy plánují na kontrolu rybolovu, byla nadále k dispozici, dokud nevstoupí v platnost nový
   finanční režim, a za účelem podpory investic členských států v této oblasti, přičemž jsou
   rovněž zohledněny potřeby Agentury Společenství pro kontrolu rybolovu.
   Navrhované rozhodnutí je v podstatě obnovením použitelnosti rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES
   o jeden rok. Priority a činnosti v rámci finanční podpory poskytované Společenstvím
   zůstávají beze změn a lhůty poskytované členským státům na předložení zprávy o dosaženém
   pokroku byly náležitě upraveny. S cílem dále zvýšit úroveň technické pomoci útvarům
   Komise však byly přidány dvě nové činnosti, které jsou vhodné z hlediska finanční podpory
   Společenství.
   Zvláštní pozornost bude věnována potřebám členských států, které k Evropské unii
   přistoupily v roce 2004.
   Částka plánovaná na rok 2006 činí 35 milionů EUR.
   Komise navrhuje Radě, aby připojený návrh přijala.
CS                                                 2                                            CS
 ---pagebreak---                                                                  2005/0136(CNS)
                                                       Návrh
                                           ROZHODNUTÍ RADY
        kterým se mění rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES o finančním příspěvku Společenství na
                             programy kontroly rybolovu členských států
   RADA EVROPSKÉ UNIE,
   s ohledem na Smlouvu o založení Evropského společenství, a zejména na článek 37 této
   smlouvy,
   s ohledem na návrh Komise1,
   s ohledem na stanovisko Evropského parlamentu2,
   vzhledem k těmto důvodům:
   (1)    Společná rybářská politika (SRP) stanoví obecná pravidla pro zachování, řízení
          a odpovědné využívání živých vodních zdrojů a jejich zpracování a uvádění na trh.
   (2)    Nařízení (ES) č. 2371/2002 ze dne 20. prosince 2002 o zachování a udržitelném
          využívání rybolovných zdrojů v rámci společné rybářské politiky3 vyzvedlo potřebu
          zvýšit spolupráci a koordinaci mezi členskými státy a s Komisí s cílem posílit kontrolu
          a odrazovat od chování odporujícího pravidlům SRP.
   (3)    Doba stanovená podle rozhodnutí Rady 2004/465/ES4 o finančním příspěvku na
          programy kontroly rybolovu členských států končí 31. prosince 2005.
   (4)    Vzhledem k domácím rozpočtovým a administrativním problémům obdržely členské
          státy, které ke Společenství přistoupily dne 1. května 2004, v rámci současného
          finančního režimu stanoveného rozhodnutím 2004/465/ES pouze velmi omezenou
          finanční podporu.
   (5)    Nový finanční výhled se vztahuje na období 2007–2013. V zájmu nepřerušování
          finanční podpory Společenství je proto nezbytné, aby tato podpora poskytovaná
          členským státům podle rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES byla poskytována také během roku
          2006.
   1
          Úř. věst. C […], […], s. […].
   2
          Úř. věst. C […], […], s. […].
   3
          Úř. věst. L 358, 31.12.2002, s. 59.
   4
          Úř. věst. L 157 ze dne 30.4.2004, s ; 114, oprava Úř. věst. L 195 ze dne 2.6.2004, s. 36.
CS                                                       3                                          CS
 ---pagebreak---    (6)     Je vhodné do rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES zahrnout studie o kontrole rybolovu
           a ustanovení, která usnadňují zavádění nových technologií kontroly rybolovných
           činností.
   PŘIJALA TOTO ROZHODNUTÍ:
                                               Článek 1
   Rozhodnutí 2004/465/ES se mění takto:
   1) V článku 3 se odstavec 2 nahrazuje tímto:
   „2. Všechny členské státy předloží své roční programy kontroly rybolovu na rok 2004 do
   1. června 2004 a na roky 2005 a 2006 do 31. ledna 2005.“
   2) V čl. 4 odst. 1 se doplňují nová písmena, která znějí:
   „i) správní ujednání se Společným výzkumným střediskem s cílem zavést nové technologie
   kontroly;
   j) studie o oblastech souvisejících s kontrolou, které jsou vypracovány z podnětu Komise.“
   3) V čl. 5 odst. 1 se první věta nahrazuje větou: „Finanční referenční částka na provádění
   opatření, pro která se na období 2004 až 2006 poskytuje finanční podpora, je 105 milionů
   eur.“
   4) V čl. 6 odst. 2 se doplňuje toto písmeno:
   „d) u opatření uvedených v čl. 4 odst. 1 písm. i) a j) může sazba činit 100 % způsobilých
   výdajů.“
   5) V čl. 12 odst. 2 se datum „31. prosince 2008“ nahrazuje datem „31. prosince 2010“.
   6) V čl. 16 písm. b) se datum „31. prosince 2006“ nahrazuje datem „31. prosince 2007“.
   7) V čl. 16 písm. b) se bod v) nahrazuje tímto:
   „v) dopad finančního příspěvku na programy kontroly rybolovu za celé období 2001 až
   2006“.
   8) V článku 17 se datum „30. června 2007“ nahrazuje datem „30. června 2008“.
                                               Článek 2
   Toto rozhodnutí se použije ode dne 1. ledna 2006.
CS                                                 4                                          CS
 ---pagebreak---                                             Článek 3
   Toto rozhodnutí je určeno členským státům.
   V Bruselu dne
                                              Za Radu
                                              předseda
CS                                              5      CS
 ---pagebreak---                           LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
   1.      NAME OF THE PROPOSAL:
           Community financial contribution towards Member States fisheries control
           programmes
   2.      ABM / ABB FRAMEWORK
           Policy Area(s) concerned and associated Activity/Activities:
           Line 1107: Fisheries conservation, control.
   3.      BUDGET LINES
   3.1.    Budget lines (operational lines and related technical and administrative
           assistance lines (ex- B.A lines)) including headings:
           11.07.02. Financial contribution to the Member States for expenditure in the
           field of control
   3.2.    Duration of the action and of the financial impact:
           2006
   3.3.    Budgetary characteristics (add rows if necessary):
                                                                Contributions  Heading in
   Budget                                        EFTA
               Type of expenditure      New                     from applicant financial
   line                                          contribution
                                                                countries      perspective
   110702      Non-          Diff5/     NO       NO             NO             No 3
               comp
   5
          Differentiated appropriations
CS                                                 6                                       CS
 ---pagebreak---    4.        SUMMARY OF RESOURCES
   4.1.      Financial Resources
   4.1.1.    Summary of commitment appropriations (CA) and payment appropriations (PA)
                                                                            EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
                                   Section        2006      2007     2008         2009       n   n + 5    Total
      Expenditure type             no.                                                       +   and
                                                                                             4   later
      Operational expenditure6
      Commitment                                  35,000                                                  35,000
                                   8.1        a
      Appropriations (CA)
      Payment    Appropriations                   3,000     7,000    14,000       11,000                  35,000
                                              b
      (PA)
      Administrative expenditure within reference amount7
      Technical               &
      administrative assistance    8.2.4      c
      (NDA)
      TOTAL REFERENCE AMOUNT
      Commitment                              a   35,000                                                  35,000
      Appropriations                          +
                                              c
      Payment                                 b   3,000       7,000    14,000     11,000                  35,000
      Appropriations                          +
                                              c
      Administrative expenditure not included in reference amount8
      Human resources and                         0,378       0,378    0,378      0,378
      associated    expenditure    8.2.5      d
      (NDA)
   6
           Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of the Title xx concerned.
   7
           Expenditure within article xx 01 04 of Title xx.
   8
           Expenditure within chapter xx 01 other than articles xx 01 04 or xx 01 05.
CS                                                        7                                                      CS
 ---pagebreak---        Administrative costs, other                    0,055      0,12   0,020    0,020
       than human resources and
       associated      costs,    not  8.2.6      e
       included in reference amount
       (NDA)
   Total indicative financial cost of intervention
       TOTAL CA including                      a+c    35,433     0,498  0,398    0,398                    36,727
       cost       of        Human              +d
       Resources                               +e
       TOTAL PA including                      b+c    3,433      7,498  14,398   11,398                   36,727
       cost       of        Human              +d
       Resources                               +e
   Co-financing details
   If the proposal involves co-financing by Member States, or other bodies (please specify
   which), an estimate of the level of this co-financing should be indicated in the table
   below (additional lines may be added if different bodies are foreseen for the provision of
   the co-financing):
                                                                            EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
       Co-financing body                     Year      n+1      n+2    n+3     n+4    n + 5
                                             n                                        and
                                                                                      later    Total
       ……………………                       f
       TOTAL CA including co-         a+c
       financing                      +d+
                                      e+f
   4.1.2.     Compatibility with Financial Programming
                          x Proposal is compatible with existing financial programming.
                              Proposal will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in the
                              financial perspective.
                              Proposal may require application of the provisions of the Inter-
                              institutional Agreement9 (i.e. flexibility instrument or revision of the
                              financial perspective).
   4.1.3.     Financial impact on Revenue
   9
             See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional agreement.
CS                                                            8                                                  CS
 ---pagebreak---                       x Proposal has no financial implications on revenue
                          Proposal has financial impact – the effect on revenue is as follows:
           NB: All details and observations relating to the method of calculating the effect
           on revenue should be shown in a separate annex.
                                                                              EUR million (to one decimal place)
                                                  Prior to   Situation following action
                                                  action
        Budget line Revenue                       [Year      [Yea [n+1] [n+2] [n+3 [n+4] [n+5]
                                                  n-1]       r n]                       ]             10
                    a) Revenue in absolute terms
                    b) Change in revenue           ∆
           (Please specify each revenue budget line involved, adding the appropriate
           number of rows to the table if there is an effect on more than one budget line.)
   4.2.    Human Resources FTE (including officials, temporary and external staff) – see
           detail under point 8.2.1.
      Annual requirements          2006        2007      2008        2009       n+4       n + 5
                                                                                          and
                                                                                          later
      Total number of 3 + ½                    3+ 1/2    3 + 1/2     3+½
      human resources
   10
          Additional columns should be added if necessary i.e. if the duration of the action exceeds 6 years
CS                                                         9                                                     CS
 ---pagebreak---    5.       CHARACTERISTICS AND OBJECTIVES
   Details of the context of the proposal are required in the Explanatory
   Memorandum. This section of the Legislative Financial Statement should include
   the following specific complementary information:
   5.1.     Needs to be met in the short or long term
   The objective of the Common Fisheries policy is to provide for sustainable exploitation
   of living aquatic resources and of aquaculture in the context of sustainable development.
   In order to ensure the effective implementation of the CFP (control, inspection and
   enforcement of the rules of the CFP falls within the responsibility of Member States), the
   Community control and enforcement system for fisheries should be reinforced and co-
   operation and co-ordination between all relevant authorities should be strengthened.
   This goal is being achieved through a number of actions performed by Member States
   which have been financed by the Community since 1990, and consequently in line with
   the objectives established under Council Regulation n° 2371/2002 on the conservation
   and sustainable exploitation of fisheries resources under the CFP11. The financial
   assistance granted to Member States by the Community has been done on the basis of
   national programmes on expenditure for fisheries control purposes.
   5.2.     Value-added of Community involvement and coherence of the proposal with
            other financial instruments and possible synergy
   Regulation n°2371/200212 establishes the obligations of Member States on fisheries
   control activities. However, without constant pressure and monitoring by the
   Commission, Member States will not fulfil their duties in accordance with the standards
   required by Community law. Furthermore, improvements towards an efficient control
   system throughout the Community will be difficult to achieve without incentives, in
   particular when new technologies shall be tested and introduced where appropriate.
   5.3.     Objectives, expected results and related indicators of the proposal in the context
            of the ABM framework
   Objectives: The situation as regards control means of Member States seems to be very
   much the same as in the beginning of 2004. Under-capacities in fishing control are
   especially significant for new Member States. It is thus necessary that Community
   financial assistance continues to be available to Member States in 2006 in the form and
   conditions established under Decision 2004/46513.
   11
           JO L 358, 31.12.2002.
   12
           See Art.23 (2) of R.n°2371/2002.
   13
           A detailed exposé on this issue is to be found in point 5 (“Description and Grounds” of the
           Legislative Financial Statement of Decision 2004/465/EC.
CS                                                      10                                             CS
 ---pagebreak---    Results: Financing rates and conditions established under Decision 2004/465/EC remain
   unchanged, and are made applicable under the proposed Decision for one further year
   until 31.12.2006.
   In particular, reimbursement on aircraft and vessel expenditure will continue to be
   applied under the proposed Decision with priority to the new Member States.
   Indicators: The Commission will continue to focus on the assessment tools that can be
   considered the best indicators to assess the effectiveness of the policy (i.e. number of
   infringements detected over a period, the rate of procedures ended compared with the
   procedures opened, the number of inspections at sea or at ports, or the number of
   sightings recorded by the aerial surveillance). The information provided by IT systems
   able to collect data from landing points, thus controlling the level of catch uptake (in
   regard to available quotas and the status of stocks), are also important assessment
   elements.
   5.4.      Method of Implementation (indicative)
             Show below the method(s)14 chosen for the implementation of the action.
                x Centralised Management
                       x Directly by the Commission
                            Indirectly by delegation to:
                                  Executive Agencies
                                  Bodies set up by the Communities as referred to in art. 185 of
                                  the Financial Regulation
                                  National public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service
                                  mission
                    Shared or decentralised management
                            With Member states
                            With Third countries
                    Joint management with international organisations (please specify)
             Relevant comments:
   14
           If more than one method is indicated please provide additional details in the "Relevant comments"
           section of this point
CS                                                      11                                                   CS
 ---pagebreak---    6.       MONITORING AND EVALUATION
   6.1.     Monitoring system
   The proposed Decision carries over for 2006 the principles and rules established in
   Decision 2004/465/EC on this issue. Expenditure must have been incurred in compliance
   both with the general condition specified in Decision 2004/465/EC and the specific
   conditions provided for by the future Commission decision fixing the amount granted.
   On its side, the Commission may require Member States to carry out on-the-spot checks
   on projects or may decide to carry them out with its own officials.
   The Commission maintains as well all existing checks and balances in regard to fraud: in
   particular, in the event any amount has been unduly paid, it shall be repaid to the
   Commission, with interest. It is worth noting that the Commission only reimburses
   invoices that the national administrations have paid.
   Member States shall report yearly to the Commission how their programmes are
   implemented, any variation they had to introduce on their programmes and shall assess
   the impact of the expenditure on control, inspection and surveillance activities. The
   proposed Decision provides for a final assessment on the 2001-2006 programmes to be
   forwarded to the Commission in 2007.
   The proposed Decision foresees that the report by the Commission on the outcome of the
   scheme will be sent to the European Parliament and the Council in 2008. In this report
   indicators mentioned above will be used to gauge the impact of this scheme.
   6.2.     Evaluation
   6.2.1.   Ex-ante evaluation
   Through the financial scheme provided for by Decisions 89/63115, 95/52716, 2001/43117
   and 2004/46518, Member States have with no doubt reinforced their control structures and
   their inspectors’ skills. This has been largely assessed in several documents, such as
   Commission’s Reports on the monitoring of the implementation of the CFP Rules by the
   Member States. Extensive details on the effects of such actions have also been given in
   the Legislative Financial Statement of Council Decision 2004/465/EC, in the Report of
   the Commission to the Council and European Parliament on Decision 89/63119, the
   Report of May 2000 on Decision 95/52720 and the Commission Communication on the
   compliance with the rules of the CFP of June 2003, which set up a Compliance
   15
           JO L 364, 14.12.1989.
   16
           JO L 301, 14.12.1995.
   17
           JO L 154, 9.6.2001.
   18
           JO L 157, 30.4.2004, as amended by JO L 195, 2.6.2004.
   19
           COM(1995) 268.
   20
           See Legislative Financial Statement to Decision 2004/465/EC, point 5.
CS                                                       12                                 CS
 ---pagebreak---    scoreboard and was made available to the general public through the Commission's web-
   site21.
   If an overall conclusion is to be drawn from these documents, is that without further
   investments in equipment and training, the control systems of Member States will not be
   able to correspond to the standards required by Community law.
   In addition, attention must be drawn to the fact that ten new Member States joined the
   Community on 1st May 2004, and that during 2004 some of these Member States faced
   internal budgetary problems which have made them have to delay certain expenditure on
   fisheries control for one or two years. Hence, in order to facilitate and speed up the
   attainment of Community standards in the fisheries control field, financial aid will
   continue to be necessary in the interim period between the expiry of Decision 2004/465
   (i.e. 31.12.2005) and the date when the future Fisheries Control Agency becomes fully
   operational.
   6.2.2.    Measures taken following an intermediate/ex-post evaluation (lessons learned
             from similar experiences in the past)
   Though assessment is very much dependant on specific monitoring, control and
   surveillance strategies adopted by each Member States (which are in turn a consequence
   of the different features of the fleet, the size of fishing grounds, quantity and value of
   catches landed), it appears that there is still room for improvement on the main issues of
   control i.e. patrol vessels and aircraft and technology systems and their network, the
   fitting on board of Vessel Monitoring Systems on board vessels, and training, the
   enhancement of pilot projects and cost/benefit analysis of expenditure in the control
   activity (in the case of all Member States).
   Moreover, it is proposed to finance two new actions: the first will be aimed at setting up
   administrative arrangements with the Community Joint Research Centre (JRC), so that
   this body may provide technical assistance in the development of control techniques. The
   second will allow the Commission’s services to carry out studies on matters related to
   control issues.
   6.2.3.    Terms and frequency of future evaluation
   The proposed Council Decision only affects the reports foreseen in Decision
   2004/465/EC (articles 16 and 17) in their timing. All other elements of reporting already
   foreseen remain unchanged.
   The final report to be drawn up by the Member States before 31.12.2007 will allow a
   thorough ex post evaluation of the scheme which will be presented the following year by
   the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council.
   21
           COM(2003) 344.
CS                                                  13                                        CS
 ---pagebreak---    In the matter of control, it is not easy to quantify the results, especially in the short term.
   The overall goal of this initiative is to enhance a control culture among the stakeholders
   in the fisheries sector which will allow an unreserved compliance with the CFP rules.
   Without effective control, conservation rules are useless; without adherence to rules,
   control activities will never be successful.
   7.        ANTI-FRAUD MEASURES
   The Member States shall verify and certify that expenditure for which a reimbursement is
   claimed has been incurred in compliance with the rules laid down by the Decision. If the
   Commission considers that the claim does not comply with the conditions laid down, it
   shall refuse to reimburse all or part of the expenditure at issue.
   The Members States shall provide the Commission with any information it may request
   and they must keep supporting documents available to the Commission for at least 5
   years from the date of reimbursement.
   Commission officials may carry out or take part on ex-post control.
   In the event of irregularity, any amount unduly paid shall be repaid to the Commission,
   together with interest.
CS                                                 14                                              CS
 ---pagebreak--- 8.          DETAILS OF RESOURCES
8.1.        Objectives of the proposal in terms of their financial cost
                                                                                      Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
(Headings of Objectives, actions Type of Av.  Year    n     Year    n+1     Year    n+2   Year    n+3    Year      n+4   Year n+5 and     TOTAL
and outputs should be provided)  output  cost                                                                            later
                                              No.     Total No.       Total No.     Total No.     Total  No.       Total No.       Total  No.      Total
                                              outputs cost  outputs   cost  outputs cost  outputs cost   outputs   cost  outputs   cost   outputs  cost
OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE
No.1 22
Action       1:       computer                        6,000
technology and IT networks.
Action 2:      remote   control                       2,500
technology.
Action 3: pilot projects on                           1,000
new technologies remote
control technology.
Action 4: training and                                2,500
exchange programmes of
control department officials
Action 5: inspection        and                       2,000
observer pilot schemes
Action 6: assessment of                               2,000
public expenditure in the
control area
Action 7: seminars and media                          1,000
22
          As described under Section 5.3
CS                                                                           15
 ---pagebreak--- Action 8: acquisition and        15,000
modernisation of control,
inspection and surveillance
equipment.
Action 9: Administrative         2,000
arrangements with the Joint
Research Centre aimed at
implementing                new
technologies on control
Action 10: Studies on control    1,000
related areas carried out at the
initiative of the Commission
TOTAL COST                       35,000
CS                                      16
 ---pagebreak---    8.2.       Administrative Expenditure
   8.2.1.     Number and type of human resources
   Types of                 Staff to be assigned to management of the action using existing and/or additional
   post                     resources (number of posts/FTEs)
                            2006           2007          2008        2009          Year n+4      Year n+5
   Officials    A*/AD       1 A/AD         1 A/AD        1 A/AD      1 A/AD
   or
   temporary    B*,         2 B/AST        2 B/AST       2 B/AST     2 B/AST
   staff23      C*/AST
   (XX 01                   ½ C/AST        ½ C/AST       ½ C/AST     ½ C/AST
   01)
   Staff financed24 by
   art. XX 01 02
   Other           staff25
   financed by art. XX
   01 04/05
   TOTAL
   8.2.2.     Description of tasks deriving from the action
              – - In view of the principle of sound financial management, assure the respect
                  of the Financial Regulation rules when implementing the concerned
                  Community legislation.
              – - Assure a good execution of available credits, in conformity with applicable
                  rules and procedures.
   8.2.3.     Sources of human resources (statutory)
   (When more than one source is stated, please indicate the number of posts originating
   from each of the sources)
                 x Posts currently allocated to the management of the programme to be
                      replaced or extended
                      Posts pre-allocated within the APS/PDB exercise for year n
                      Posts to be requested in the next APS/PDB procedure
   23
             Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount
   24
             Cost of which is NOT covered by the reference amount
   25
             Cost of which is included within the reference amount
CS                                                         17                                                 CS
 ---pagebreak---    Posts to be redeployed using existing resources within the managing
   service (internal redeployment)
   Posts required for year n although not foreseen in the APS/PDB exercise
   of the year in question
CS                                18                                       CS
 ---pagebreak---    8.2.4.     Other Administrative expenditure included in reference amount (XX 01 04/05 –
              Expenditure on administrative management)
                                                                        EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
   Budget line                                                                          Year
                                                                                        n+5
                                               Year     Year     Year  Year     Year
   (number and heading)                                                                         TOTAL
                                               n        n+1      n+2   n+3      n+4
                                                                                        and
                                                                                        later
   1     Technical     and    administrative
   assistance (including related staff costs)
   Executive agencies26
   Other technical        and  administrative
   assistance
   - intra muros
   - extra muros
   Total Technical       and  administrative
   assistance
   8.2.5.     Financial cost of human resources and associated costs not included in the
              reference amount
                                                                        EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
                                                                                               Year n+5
   Type of human resources           2006        2007        2008      2009        Year n+4
                                                                                               and later
                                     0, 378      0, 378      0, 378    0, 378
   Officials and temporary staff
   (XX 01 01)
   Staff financed by Art XX 01 02
   (auxiliary, END, contract staff,
   etc.)
   (specify budget line)
   Total     cost    of     Human    0, 378      0, 378      0,378     0, 378
   Resources and associated
   costs (NOT in reference
   amount)
   26
             Reference should be made to the specific legislative financial statement for the Executive
             Agency(ies) concerned.
CS                                                      19                                                CS
 ---pagebreak---    Calculation– Officials and Temporary agents
   Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable
   3 x €108 000 = € 324 000
   ½ x €108 000 = €54 000
   Calculation– Staff financed under art. XX 01 02
   Reference should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable
   8.2.6 Other administrative expenditure not included in reference amount
                                                                            EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
                                                                                            Year
                                                                                            n+5
                                                                                    Year
                                                 2006     2007     2008     2009                    TOTAL
                                                                                    n+4
                                                                                            and
                                                                                            later
   XX 01 02 11 01 – Missions                     0,020    0,020    0,020    0,020                   0,080
   XX 01 02 11 02 – Meetings & Conferences
   XX 01 02 11 03 – Committees27                 0,035                                              0,035
   XX 01 02 11 04 – Studies & consultations               0,10                                      0,10
   XX 01 02 11 05 – Information systems
   2 Total Other Management Expenditure
   (XX 01 02 11)
   3     Other       expenditure       of   an
   administrative nature (specify including
   reference to budget line)
   Total Administrative expenditure, other
   than human resources and associated
                                                 0,055    0,12     0,020    0,020                   0,215
   costs (NOT included in reference
   amount)
   Calculation - Other administrative expenditure not included in reference amount
   27
             Specify the type of committee and the group to which it belongs.
CS                                                        20                                                  CS