CELEX: 62018TA0679
Language: en
Date: 2019-09-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-679/18: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — Showroom v EUIPO — E-Gab (SHOWROOM) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark SHOWROOM — Earlier EU figurative mark SHOWROOM86 — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

25.11.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 399/56
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2019 — Showroom v EUIPO — E-Gab (SHOWROOM)
      (Case T-679/18) (1)
      
      (EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark SHOWROOM - Earlier EU figurative mark SHOWROOM86 - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
      (2019/C 399/69)
      Language of the case: Polish
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Showroom sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: M. Janicka-Kapłon, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Śliwińska and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: E-Gab NV (Ternat, Belgium)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 September 2018 (Case R 1834/2017-2), relating to opposition proceedings between E-Gab and Showroom.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     Dismisses the action;
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     Orders Showroom sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 25, 21.1.2019.