CELEX: 62012FA0012
Language: en
Date: 2013-06-26 00:00:00
Title: Case F-12/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — Di Prospero v Commission (Civil Service — Appointment — Success in a competition following a request to the applicant to sit the competition with a view to complying with a judgment — Appointment in the grade with retroactive effect)

31.8.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 252/45
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 26 June 2013 — Di Prospero v Commission
   (Case F-12/12) (1)
   
   (Civil Service - Appointment - Success in a competition following a request to the applicant to sit the competition with a view to complying with a judgment - Appointment in the grade with retroactive effect)
   2013/C 252/78
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Rita Di Prospero (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and B. Eggers, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Civil Service — Action for annulment of the Commission’s implied decision rejecting the applicant’s request for classification at grade AD 11 with retroactive effect as at 1 January 2010 and for compensation for damage allegedly suffered.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               The decision of the European Commission of 18 October 2011 refusing to grade Ms Di Prospero in grade AD 11 with retroactive effect from 1 January 2010 is annulled;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The remainder of the action is dismissed;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The European Commission shall bear its own costs and shall pay those incurred by Ms Di Prospero.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 138, 12.5.2012, p. 32.