CELEX: 62010TB0120
Language: en
Date: 2011-11-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-120/10: Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission (Access to documents of the institutions — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Implied refusal of access — Interest in bringing proceedings — Express decision adopted after the action was brought — Refusal to amend the form of order sought — No need to adjudicate)

7.1.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 6/16
            
         Order of the General Court of 9 November 2011 — ClientEarth and Others v Commission
   (Case T-120/10) (1)
   
   (Access to documents of the institutions - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Implied refusal of access - Interest in bringing proceedings - Express decision adopted after the action was brought - Refusal to amend the form of order sought - No need to adjudicate)
   2012/C 6/30
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: ClientEarth (London, United Kingdom); European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E) (Brussels, Belgium); European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels); BirdLife International (Brussels) (represented by: S. Hockman QC, and by P. Kirch, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and C. ten Dam, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the Commission decision of 9 February 2010 refusing access to certain documents relating to biofuels modelling
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               There is no need to adjudicate on the action.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The European Commission shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by ClientEarth, the European Federation for Transport and Environment (T&E), the European Environmental Bureau (EEB) and BirdLife International.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 134, 22.5.2010.