CELEX: 62013TN0575
Language: en
Date: 2013-10-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-575/13: Action brought on 30 October 2013 — Lesaffre et Compagnie v OHIM — Louis Baking Company (BAKING CENTER BY TECHNOLINE)

1.2.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 31/11
            
         Action brought on 30 October 2013 — Lesaffre et Compagnie v OHIM — Louis Baking Company (BAKING CENTER BY TECHNOLINE)
   (Case T-575/13)
   2014/C 31/20
   Language in which the application was lodged: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Lesaffre et Compagnie (Paris, France) (represented by: T. De Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Louis Baking Company, SL (Girona, Spain)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               Annul in its entirety the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 30 August 2013 in Case R 2333/2012-4; and
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order OHIM to pay the costs incurred by Lesaffre in the proceedings before the General Court and before the Fourth Board of Appeal.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: Louis Baking Company, SL
   
      Community trade mark concerned: Coloured figurative mark containing the word elements ‘BAKING CENTER By TECHNOLINE’ for goods and services in Classes 30, 35 and 42 — Application for Community trade mark No 9 195 793
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Applicant
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: French mark ‘BAKING CENTER’ for services in Class 41
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.