CELEX: 62007CN0494
Language: en
Date: 2007-11-12 00:00:00
Title: Case C-494/07: Action brought on 12 November 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic

12.1.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 8/10
            
         Action brought on 12 November 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Hellenic Republic
   (Case C-494/07)
   (2008/C 8/17)
   Language of the case: Greek
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Patakia and D. Recchia)
   
      Defendant: Hellenic Republic
   Form of order sought
   The Court is asked to
   
               —
            
            
               declare, that, by failing to take the measures necessary to implement correctly its obligations under Articles 6(4), 12 and 13 (in conjunction with Annex IV) of Council Directive 92/43/EEC (1) of 21 May 1992 on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under those provisions;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main argument
   The Commission has examined the compatibility of the measures taken by the Hellenic Republic to transpose Directive 92/43/EEC.
   Its review showed that certain provisions of the directive have not been fully implemented and/or have not been transposed correctly.
   In particular, the Commission considers that the use of the phrase ‘reasons of essential public interest’ in the Greek legislation instead of the phrase ‘imperative reasons of overriding public interest’ referred to in Article 6(4) of the directive, is an incorrect transposition of the provision in question, because it widens the possibility of use of the derogation provided for and is not compatible with the need to interpret it narrowly.
   The Commission also considers that the addition, in the Greek legislation, of the words ‘of particular economic significance’ to the phrase ‘imperative reasons of overriding public interest’ contained in Article 6(4) of the directive, bringing into operation the exception provided for in that provision, constitutes an incorrect transposition of Article 6(4) of the directive, because it adds further possibilities of derogation.
   Lastly, the Commission ascertained that, as the Greek authorities acknowledge, the provisions of the Greek legislation transposing Articles 12 and 13 do not refer to the Annex which specifies their scope of application, so that the above articles of the directive have not been correctly transposed.
   The Commission therefore considers that the Hellenic Republic has not correctly implemented Articles 6(4), 12 and 13 of the Directive on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora.
   
      (1)  OJ L 206 of 22.7.1992.