CELEX: 31996M0797
Language: en
Date: 1996-08-22 00:00:00
Title: COMMISSION DECISION of 22/08/1996 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.797 - GrantRail Limited) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic)

Avis juridique important

|

31996M0797

COMMISSION DECISION of 22/08/1996 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.797 - GrantRail Limited) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic)  

Official Journal C 361 , 30/11/1996 P. 0004

 COMMISSION DECISION of 22/08/1996 declaring a concentration to be  compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.797 - GrantRail Limited)  according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89  (Only the English text is authentic) The paper version of the decision is available through the sales offices  of the Office of Official Publications of the European Communities. PUBLIC VERSION MERGER PROCEDURE ARTICLE 6(1)(b) DECISION To the notifying parties Dear Sirs, Subject :<ind> Case No IV/M.797   GrantRail Limited <ind> Notification of 24.07.1996 pursuant to Article 4 of Council  Regulation No 4064/89 1.<ind> On 24 July 1996 the Commission received a notification of a  proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EEC)  No. 4064/89 by which the undertakings British Steel plc ("British Steel")  and Volker Stevin (UK) Limited, which is controlled by Koninklijke Volker  Stevin n.v. ("Volker Stevin"), acquire within the meaning of Article  3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation joint control of GrantRail Limited by  way of the purchase of shares in a newly created company constituting a  joint venture. 2.<ind> After examination of the notification, the Commission has  concluded that the notified operation falls within the scope of the  Council Regulation and does not raise serious doubts as to its  compatibility with the common market and with the functioning of the EEA  Agreement.  I. <tab> THE PARTIES' ACTIVITIES AND THE OPERATION 3.<ind> The business activities of the undertakings concerned are : <ind> <ind> for British Steel: the production and distribution of steel  products; <ind> <ind> for Volker Stevin: civil engineering, road, railway and  pipeline construction. 4.<ind> The joint venture will be jointly controlled by British Steel and  Volker Stevin. After completion of the concentration both British Steel  and Volker Stevin will each hold 50% of the shares in the joint venture.  Furthermore, the joint venture will perform, on a lasting basis, all the  functions of an autonomous economic entity and its creation will not give  rise to coordination of competitive behaviour of the parties amongst  themselves or between them and the joint venture. II.<tab> COMMUNITY DIMENSION 5.<ind> Both British Steel and Volker Stevin have a combined aggregate  worldwide turnover in excess of ECU 5,000 million (British Steel, ECU  9,717 million and Volker Stevin, ECU 1,265 million). Each of them has a  Communitywide turnover in excess of ECU 250 million (British Steel, ECU  7,612 million and Volker Stevin, ECU 1,190 million), but they do not  achieve more than twothirds of their aggregate Community turnover within  one and the same Member State. The notified operation therefore has a  Community dimension, but does not constitute a cooperation case under the  EEA Agreement. III. <tab> COMPATIBILITY WITH THE COMMON MARKET <tab> Relevant product market 6.<ind> British Steel and Volker Stevin through their respective, wholly  owned subsidiaries, Grant Lyon Eagre Limited and Railbouw (UK) Limited,  are to transfer to GrantRail Limited, all these subsidiaries' relevant  assets relating to the construction, renewal and maintenance of railway  infrastructure. Furthermore the notifying parties state that there is a  relevant product market for the construction, renewal and maintenance of  railway infrastructure. However, it is not necessary to conclude on the  definition of the relevant product market because, in all alternative  markets considered, effective competition would not be significantly  impeded in the EEA or any substantial part of that area.  <tab> Relevant geographic market 7.<ind> The relevant geographic market appears to be at national as, until  recently, the procurement policies of the Member States' railway companies  were conducted on such a basis. However, due to the implementation of EC  public procurement directives the market isexpected, in the future, to  become European Unionwide. However, it is not necessary to further  identify the relevant geographic market because, in all alternative  markets considered, effective competition would not be significantly  impeded in the EEA or any substantial part of that area.  <ind> Assessment 8. <ind> Horizontal aspects <ind> In the UK the estimated market share of GrantRail Limited will be  less than [Deleted for publication: below 10%]; the company's EEA market  share is considered to be less than [Deleted for publication:  insignificant]. 9.<ind> Vertical aspects <ind> It is anticipated that GrantRail Limited will, with respect to at  least some of its steel rail requirements, be supplied by British Steel.  Given that steel rails are traded throughout the Community and that  British Steel's share of this market is estimated to be some [Deleted for  publication : 1120%], the vertical link between British Steel and  GrantRail Limited is not considered to give rise to any foreclosure in  this market. 10.<ind> In view of the market share of the notifying parties, it appears  that the notified operation will have a de minimis impact on competition  in the European Union and, consequently, effective competition would not  be significantly impeded in the EEA or any substantial part of that area.   IV.<ind> CONCLUSION 11.<ind> For the above reasons, the Commission has decided not to oppose  the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market  and with the functioning of the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in  application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 4064/89. For the Commission,