CELEX: C2007/269/128
Language: en
Date: 2007-11-10 00:00:00
Title: Case F-71/07: Action brought on 16 July 2007 — Karatzoglou v EAR

10.11.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 269/70
            
         Action brought on 16 July 2007 — Karatzoglou v EAR
   (Case F-71/07)
   (2007/C 269/128)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Georgios Karatzoglou (Preveza, Greece) (represented by: S. A. Pappas, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Agency for Reconstruction (EAR)
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Order the EAR to pay the amount of EUR 348 965,96 in order to compensate the material damage suffered by the absence of compliance to judgement of the Fourth Chamber of the Court of First Instance of 23 February 2006 in Case T-471/04 (Georgios Karatzoglou v European Agency for Reconstruction) (1);
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the EAR to pay the amount of EUR 100 000 in order to compensate the non-material damage suffered by the absence of compliance to judgement T-471/04;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the EAR to pay the amount of EUR 100 000 in order to compensate the non-material damage suffered by the service related fault committed by EAR as it refused to take any specific measure to comply with judgement T-471/04;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the EAR to pay interest on the aforementioned amounts of 3 % since the publication of judgement T-471/04;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the EAR to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   The applicant mainly claims that The EAR infringed Article 233 EC in so far as it did not take the necessary measures to comply with the above-mentioned judgement of the Court of First Instance.
   
      (1)  OJ C 96, of 22.4.2006, p. 13.