CELEX: 62017TN0686
Language: en
Date: 2017-10-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-686/17: Action brought on 4 October 2017 — Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros and Medicina Asturiana v SRB

11.12.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 424/50
            
         Action brought on 4 October 2017 — Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros and Medicina Asturiana v SRB
   (Case T-686/17)
   (2017/C 424/74)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Policlínico Centro Médico de Seguros, SA (Oviedo, Spain) and Medicina Asturiana, SA (Oviedo) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninck, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Single Resolution Board
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicants claim that the General Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Declare that the Single Resolution Board has incurred non-contractual liability and order it to repair the harm suffered by the applicants as a result of both its actions and its omissions which deprived them of the BANCO POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. bonds and securities they owned;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the Board to pay to the applicants EUR 1 850 000 and the bonds’ unpaid interest accrued up to the date of repayment as compensation for the harm suffered (‘the amount due’);
            
         
               —
            
            
               Increase the amount due with compensatory interest as of 7 June 2017 until delivery of the judgment disposing of the present case;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Increase the amount due with corresponding default interest as of the date of delivery of judgment until its payment in full, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points.
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the SRB to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-659/17 Vallina Fonseca v SRB.