CELEX: 62017TN0122
Language: en
Date: 2017-02-22 00:00:00
Title: Case T-122/17: Action brought on 22 February 2017 — Devin v EUIPO — Haskovo (DEVIN)

18.4.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 121/47
            
         Action brought on 22 February 2017 — Devin v EUIPO — Haskovo (DEVIN)
   (Case T-122/17)
   (2017/C 121/67)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Devin AD (Devin, Bulgaria) (represented by: B. Van Asbroeck, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Haskovo Chamber of Commerce and Industry (Haskovo, Bulgaria)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘DEVIN’ — EU trade mark No 9 408 865
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2016 in Case R 579/2016-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the Cancellation Division’s decision dated 29 January 2016 in the case No 9 559;
            
         
               —
            
            
               entirely or at least partially reject the Cancellation Applicant’s application for invalidity of the EU trade mark ‘DEVIN’ No 9408865 for all the designated goods in class 32;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO to bear its own costs and pay those of the applicant.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 52(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               To the extent that the Board of Appeal has not infringed Article 7(1)(c), infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009.