CELEX: C2004/106/111
Language: en
Date: 2004-04-30 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the court of first instance of 18 March2004 in Case T-67/02: Léopold Radauer v Council of the European Union(Officials — Transfer of the flat-rate redemption value of retirement pensionrights acquired in the course of professional activities prior to entry intothe service of the Communities — Calculation of the years of pensionable service— Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations — General implementingprovisions — Principle of equal treatment — Free movement of workers)

30.4.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 106/57
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 18 March 2004
   in Case T-67/02: Léopold Radauer v Council of the European Union (1)
   
   (Officials - Transfer of the flat-rate redemption value of retirement pension rights acquired in the course of professional activities prior to entry into the service of the Communities - Calculation of the years of pensionable service - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - General implementing provisions - Principle of equal treatment - Free movement of workers)
   (2004/C 106/111)
   Language of the case: French
   In Case T-67/02: Léopold Radauer, an official of the Council of the European Union, residing in Brussels, represented by G. Vandersanden and L. Levi, avocats, against Council of the European Union (Agent: F. Anton) – application for annulment of the Council decision of 17 April 2001 calculating the applicant's years of pensionable service following transfer to the Community scheme of the flat-rate redemption value of the retirement pension rights which he had acquired under the Austrian scheme – the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: R. García Valdecasas, President, P. Lindh and J.D. Cooke, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator, for the Registrar, delivered a judgment on 18 March 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:
   
               (1)
            
            
               The application is dismissed.
            
         
               (2)
            
            
               The parties shall bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 97 of 20.04.02.