CELEX: 62015TN0400
Language: en
Date: 2015-07-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-400/15: Action brought on 20 July 2015 — Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto v OHIM — University College London (CITRUS SATURDAY)

28.9.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 320/35
            
         Action brought on 20 July 2015 — Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto v OHIM — University College London (CITRUS SATURDAY)
   (Case T-400/15)
   (2015/C 320/52)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Ana Isabel Pinto Eliseu Baptista Lopes Canhoto (Algés, Portugal) (represented by: A. Pita Negrão, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: University College London (London, United Kingdom)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘CITRUS SATURDAY’ — Application for registration No 11 789 195
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 April 2015 in Case R 2109/2014-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               consider the appeal admissible;
            
         
               —
            
            
               declare null and void the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               remit the case to the Opposition Division of the Office for further prosecution.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of the Community trade mark regulations;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of principles of the EC law.