CELEX: 62018CN0167
Language: en
Date: 2018-03-02 00:00:00
Title: Case C-167/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias (Spain) lodged on 2 March 2018 — Unión Insular de CC.OO. de Lanzarote v Swissport Spain Aviation Services Lanzarote, S.L.

201806010231917402018/C 211/131672018CJC21120180618EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180302111111Case C-167/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias (Spain) lodged on 2 March 2018 — Unión Insular de CC.OO. de Lanzarote v Swissport Spain Aviation Services Lanzarote, S.L.
 ---documentbreak--- C2112018EN1110120180302EN0013111111Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias (Spain) lodged on 2 March 2018 — Unión Insular de CC.OO. de Lanzarote v Swissport Spain Aviation Services Lanzarote, S.L.
   (Case C-167/18)2018/C 211/13Language of the case: Spanish
      Referring court
   
   Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Canarias
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant at first instance and appellant at second instance: Unión Insular de CC.OO. de Lanzarote
   
      Defendant at first instance and respondent at second instance: Swissport Spain Aviation Services Lanzarote, S.L.
   
      Questions referred
   
   
            1.
         
         
            Does Article 1(1) of Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses (
                  1
               ) apply when an undertaking ceases to hold the contract for the service it is engaged to provide for a client as a result of termination of the contract for the provision of the service, in a labour-intensive business (cleaning of facilities), and the new holder of the contract for the services takes over the majority of the employees assigned to the performance of that service, when those employment contracts are taken over in accordance with the terms of the collective agreement on employment in the cleaning sector?
         
      
            2.
         
         
            Is the interpretation of the Tribunal Supremo (Supreme Court, Spain), to the effect that a transfer of staff pursuant to the terms of the collective agreement does not constitute a transfer of an undertaking, since it does not satisfy the requirement of voluntary transfer, and that, consequently, Directive 2001/23 does not apply, compatible with that directive (as interpreted by the Court of Justice of the European Union)?
         
      
            3.
         
         
            May the rules laid down in Directive 2001/23 be considered to mean that, where, in cases involving undertakings in the services sector, the collective agreement for that sector lays down an obligation to take over the employees, this constitutes a transfer of staff and, therefore, a transfer of undertakings within the meaning of the aforementioned directive?
         
      
            4.
         
         
            Is Article 14 of the Convenio Colectivo de Limpieza de Edificios y Locales de la Provincia de Las Palmas 2012/2014 (Collective Agreement applicable to the Cleaning of Buildings and Premises in the Province of Las Palmas 2012/2014) –– which provides, in cases in which employees are taken over by another undertaking pursuant to the collective agreement, that the employees taken over do not retain either the rights and obligations which they held with the transferor undertaking or the working conditions established by collective agreement –– compatible with Article 3 of Directive 2001/23?
         
      (
         1
      )	OJ 2001 L 82, p. 16.