CELEX: 62016TA0262
Language: en
Date: 2017-05-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-262/16: Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2017 — Globo Media v EUIPO — Globo Comunicação e Participações (GLOBO MEDIA) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark GLOBO MEDIA — Earlier national figurative mark TV GLOBO PORTUGAL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

26.6.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 202/17
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2017 — Globo Media v EUIPO — Globo Comunicação e Participações (GLOBO MEDIA)
   (Case T-262/16) (1)
   
   ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GLOBO MEDIA - Earlier national figurative mark TV GLOBO PORTUGAL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   (2017/C 202/30)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Globo Media, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: L. Estropá Navarro and J. Calderón Chavero, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and B. Uriarte Valiente, acting as Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Globo Comunicação e Participações S/A (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2016 (Case R 0561/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Globo Comunicação e Participações and Globo Media.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Globo Media, SA to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.