CELEX: C2007/297/80
Language: en
Date: 2007-12-08 00:00:00
Title: Case T-28/05: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 October 2007 — Ekabe International v OHIM — Ebro Puleva (OMEGA 3) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative trade mark OMEGA 3 — Earlier national word mark PULEVA-OMEGA 3 — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

8.12.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 297/39
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 18 October 2007 — Ekabe International v OHIM — Ebro Puleva (OMEGA 3)
   (Case T-28/05) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative trade mark OMEGA 3 - Earlier national word mark PULEVA-OMEGA 3 - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2007/C 297/80)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Ekabe International SCA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: C. de Haas, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: Ebro Puleva SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: P. Casamitjana Lleonart, lawyer)
   Re:
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 October 2004 (Case R 117/2001-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Puleva SA (now Ebro Puleva SA) and Ekabe International SCA
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Ekabe International SCA to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 82, 2.4.2005.