CELEX: C2006/086/51
Language: en
Date: 2006-04-08 00:00:00
Title: Joined Cases T-466/04 and T-467/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of  1 February 2006  — Elisabetta Dami v OHIM (Community trade mark — Word mark GERONIMO STILTON — Opposition — Stay of proceedings — Restriction of the list of goods designated by the mark for which registration is sought — Withdrawal of the opposition)

8.4.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 86/26
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 1 February 2006 — Elisabetta Dami v OHIM
   (Joined Cases T-466/04 and T-467/04) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Word mark GERONIMO STILTON - Opposition - Stay of proceedings - Restriction of the list of goods designated by the mark for which registration is sought - Withdrawal of the opposition)
   (2006/C 86/51)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Elisabetta Dami (Milan, Italy) (represented by: P. Beduschi and S. Giudici, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: The Stilton Cheese Makers Association (Surbiton, Surrey, United Kingdom)
   Action
   Two actions against the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 September 2004 (Cases R 973/2002-2 and R 982/2002-2) concerning opposition proceedings between Mrs Elisabetta Dami and The Stilton Cheese Makers Association,
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               annuls the decisions of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 20 September 2004 (Cases R 973/2002-2 and R 982/2002-2);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               orders OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 69, 19.3.2005.