CELEX: C2004/284/36
Language: en
Date: 2004-11-20 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 May 2004 in Case T-391/02, Bundesverband der Nahrungsmittel- und Speiseresteverwertung eV, Josef Kloh v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (Application for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 — Health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption — Manifest inadmissibility)

20.11.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 284/17
            
         
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 10 May 2004 (1)
   
   in Case T-391/02, Bundesverband der Nahrungsmittel- und Speiseresteverwertung eV, Josef Kloh v European Parliament and Council of the European Union
   (Application for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 - Health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption - Manifest inadmissibility)
   (2004/C 284/36)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case T-391/02, Bundesverband der Nahrungsmittel- und Speiseresteverwertung eV, established in Bochum (Germany), Josef Kloh, resident in Eichenried (Germany), represented by R. Steiling and S. Wienhues, lawyers, against European Parliament (Agents: H. Duintjer Tebbens and U. Rösslein, with an address for service in Luxembourg) and Council of the European Union (Agents: J.-P. Hix and F. Ruggeri Laderchi), supported by the Commission of the European Communities (Agent: G. Braun, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application for partial annulment of Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 of the European Parliament and the Council of 3 October 2002 laying down health rules concerning animal by-products not intended for human consumption (OJ 2002 L 273, p. 1) — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, W. H. Meij and N. J. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has given a judgment on 10 May 2004, in which it ordered:
   
               1.
            
            
               The application is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene of the Landwirtschaftskammer Vorarlberg and Messrs Wohlgenannt and Taferner.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The applicants shall bear their own costs and those of the European Parliament and the Council.
            
         
               4.
            
            
               The Commission shall bear its own costs.
            
         
               5.
            
            
               The Landwirtschaftskammer Vorarlberg and Messrs Wohlgenannt and Taferner, the parties making applications to intervene, shall bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 44 of 22.2.2003.