CELEX: 62008TA0575
Language: en
Date: 2010-09-08 00:00:00
Title: Case T-575/08: Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — 4care v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (Acumed) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark Acumed — Earlier national word mark AQUAMED ACTIVE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Similarity of the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

23.10.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 288/37
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 8 September 2010 — 4care v OHIM — Laboratorios Diafarm (Acumed)
      (Case T-575/08) (1)
      
      (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark Acumed - Earlier national word mark AQUAMED ACTIVE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Similarity of the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
      (2010/C 288/70)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: 4care AG (Kiel, Germany) (represented by: S. Redeker and M. Diesbach, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, Agent)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Laboratorios Diafarm, SA (Barberà del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 October 2008 (Case R 1636/2007-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Laboratorios Diafarm, SA and 4care AG.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders 4care AG to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 55, 7.3.2009.