CELEX: 62019TN0669
Language: en
Date: 2019-10-02 00:00:00
Title: Case T-669/19: Action brought on 2 October 2019 – Novomatic v EUIPO – Brouwerij Haacht (PRIMUS)

25.11.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 399/94
            
         
      Action brought on 2 October 2019 – Novomatic v EUIPO – Brouwerij Haacht (PRIMUS)
      (Case T-669/19)
      (2019/C 399/113)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Novomatic AG (Gumpoldskirchen, Austria) (represented by: W. Mosing, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Brouwerij Haacht NV (Boortmeerbeek, Belgium)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
      
         Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union word mark PRIMUS – Application for registration No 14 712 723
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 July 2019 in Case R 2528/2018-5
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order EUIPO and, in case it intervenes in writing, the other party to the proceedings before EUIPO to bear its own costs and to compensate the costs incurred by the Plaintiff in the proceeding in front of the General Court and in the appellate proceedings before EUIPO.
               
            
         Pleas in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of essential procedural requirements, namely the requirement of evidence in terms of legal certainty;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 7(2)(b) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625 of the Commission.