CELEX: 62016TB0341
Language: en
Date: 2017-05-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-341/16: Order of the General Court of 4 May 2017 — De Masi v Commission (Action for annulment — Access to documents — Request for access on the basis of the inter-institutional cooperation by virtue of Article 230 TFEU — Documents concerning the work of the ‘Code of conduct (Business Taxation)’ group instituted by the Council — Act not open to challenge — Inadmissibility)

10.7.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 221/28
            
         Order of the General Court of 4 May 2017 — De Masi v Commission
   (Case T-341/16) (1)
   
   ((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Request for access on the basis of the inter-institutional cooperation by virtue of Article 230 TFEU - Documents concerning the work of the ‘Code of conduct (Business Taxation)’ group instituted by the Council - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))
   (2017/C 221/40)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Fabio De Masi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Fischer-Lescano, professor)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision contained in the Commission’s letter of 8 June 2016, responding to the request of the President of the European Parliament’s Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect (TAXE2) for full access to the documents of the ‘Code of conduct (Business Taxation)’ group.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Fabio De Masi shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 287, 8.8.2016.