CELEX: 62011TB0559
Language: en
Date: 2013-05-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-559/11: Order of the General Court of 16 May 2013 — BybyOKD v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Sale by the Czech Republic of its minority shareholding in the company OKD as part of a privatisation — Decision finding no State aid — Professional association — No individual concern — Concept of party concerned — Inadmissibility)

29.6.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 189/22
            
         Order of the General Court of 16 May 2013 — BybyOKD v Commission
   (Case T-559/11) (1)
   
   (Action for annulment - State aid - Sale by the Czech Republic of its minority shareholding in the company OKD as part of a privatisation - Decision finding no State aid - Professional association - No individual concern - Concept of party concerned - Inadmissibility)
   2013/C 189/46
   Language of the case: Czech
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Sdružení nájemníků BybyOKD.cz (Ostrava, Czech Republic) (represented by: R. Pelikán, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action for annulment of Commission Decision C(2011) 4927 final of 13 July 2011 concerning the sale to Karbon Invest a.s. of the minority shareholding of the Czech State in OKD a.s. and declaring that that sale did not constitute State aid (State aid No SA.25076 (2011/NN) (OJ 2011 C 225, p. 1).
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Sdružení nájemníků BybyOKD.cz shall pay the costs.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of RPG Industries Limited.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 13, 14.1.2012.