CELEX: 62011TA0371
Language: en
Date: 2012-10-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-371/11: Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2012 — Monier Roofing Components v OHIM (CLIMA COMFORT) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community word mark CLIMA COMFORT — Absolute ground for refusal — Lack of distinctiveness — Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Right to be heard — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 — Ex officio examination of the facts — Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)

24.11.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 366/33
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 16 October 2012 — Monier Roofing Components v OHIM (CLIMA COMFORT)
   (Case T-371/11) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Application for the Community word mark CLIMA COMFORT - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctiveness - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Right to be heard - Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Ex officio examination of the facts - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009)
   2012/C 366/65
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Monier Roofing Components (Oberursel, Germany) (represented by: F. Ekey, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, Agent)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 April 2011 (Case R 2026/2010-1), concerning an application for registration of the word sign CLIMA COMFORT as a Community trade mark.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Monier Roofing Components GmbH to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 269, 10.9.2011.