CELEX: 62007CB0163
Language: en
Date: 2007-11-27 00:00:00
Title: Case C-163/07 P: Order of the Court of 27 November 2007 — Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Musa Akar v Commission of the European Communities (Appeal — Public works contracts — Admissibility — Essential procedural conditions — Mandatory representation of natural or legal persons by a lawyer authorised to practise before a court of a Member State — Appeal clearly unfounded)

23.2.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 51/30
            
         Order of the Court of 27 November 2007 — Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Musa Akar v Commission of the European Communities
   (Case C-163/07 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Public works contracts - Admissibility - Essential procedural conditions - Mandatory representation of natural or legal persons by a lawyer authorised to practise before a court of a Member State - Appeal clearly unfounded)
   (2008/C 51/50)
   Language of the case: German
   Parties
   
      Applicants: Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Musa Akar (represented by: C. Șahin, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. van Nuffel and F. Hoffmeister, Agents)
   Re:
   Appeal brought against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 17 January 2007 in Case T-129/06 Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Akar v Commission in which the Court of First Instance dismissed as inadmissible an application for, first, the annulment of the decision of the Commission of 23 December 2005 relating to the award of the public works contract for the construction of educational establishments in the provinces of Siirt and Diyarbakir and, secondly, suspension of the implementation of the procedure in question — No information, in the contested decision, as to the need to be represented by a lawyer qualified to practise before a court of a Member State in the event of proceedings being brought against the contested decision — Regularised application lodged out of time.
   Operative part
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Diy-Mar Insaat Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi and Musa Akar are ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 129, 9.6.2007.