CELEX: 62019TA0790
Language: en
Date: 2021-10-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-790/19: Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Novolipetsk Steel v Commission (Measures that the European Union may take in relation to the combined effect of anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures with safeguard measures — Importation of cold-rolled flat steel products and hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel — Modification of regulations imposing anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures on products subject to safeguard measures — Principle of non-discrimination — Manifest error of assessment)

13.12.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 502/20
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 20 October 2021 — Novolipetsk Steel v Commission
      (Case T-790/19) (1)
      
      (Measures that the European Union may take in relation to the combined effect of anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures with safeguard measures - Importation of cold-rolled flat steel products and hot-rolled flat products of iron, non-alloy or other alloy steel - Modification of regulations imposing anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures on products subject to safeguard measures - Principle of non-discrimination - Manifest error of assessment)
      (2021/C 502/30)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Novolipetsk Steel PAO (Lipetsk, Russia) (represented by: E. Gergondet and P. Vander Schueren, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1382 of 2 September 2019 amending certain Regulations imposing anti-dumping or anti-subsidy measures on certain steel products subject to safeguard measures (OJ 2019 L 227, p. 1), in so far as it concerns the applicant.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders Novolipetsk Steel PAO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 10, 13.1.2020.