CELEX: 62016CN0098
Language: en
Date: 2016-02-17 00:00:00
Title: Case C-98/16: Action brought on 17 February 2016 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

25.4.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 145/25
            
         Action brought on 17 February 2016 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic
   (Case C-98/16)
   (2016/C 145/31)
   Language of the case: Greek
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Roels and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)
   
      Defendant: Hellenic Republic
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Declare that the Hellenic Republic, by the adoption and retention in force of legislation which provides that a preferential inheritance tax rate for bequests of which the beneficiaries are non-profit-making bodies established in other Member States of the EU/EEA is subject to a condition of reciprocity, has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 63 TFEU and Article 40 of the EEA Agreement;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The Greek legislation provides for a lower tax rate for bequests of which the beneficiaries are non-profit-making (charitable etc) legal persons. However the low rate is not valid for bequests to equivalent foreign legal persons, unless the relevant States themselves grant more favourable treatment with respect to bequests to Greek non-profit-making legal persons (that is, subject to a condition of reciprocity).
   
               —
            
            
               That legislation involves discrimination to the disadvantage of (non-profit-making) legal persons of other Member States of the EU (and the EEA), which constitutes a restriction on the free movement of capital (Article 63 TFEU).
            
         
               —
            
            
               That restriction is not covered by the exceptions in Article 65 TFEU.
            
         
               —
            
            
               The restriction cannot be justified by the relief provided to the national budget by the activities of national non-profit-making bodies (the financial argument is unacceptable).
            
         
               —
            
            
               Last, the principle of reciprocity cannot justify an infringement of the principle of free movement of capital by means of discrimination.