CELEX: 62010CA0297
Language: en
Date: 2011-09-08 00:00:00
Title: Joined Cases C-297/10 and C-298/10: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany)) — Sabine Hennigs (C-297/10) v Eisenbahn-Bundesamt, Land Berlin (C-298/10) v Alexander Mai (Directive 2000/78/EC — Articles 2(2) and 6(1) — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Articles 21 and 28 — Collective agreement on pay for public sector contractual employees of a Member State — Pay determined by reference to age — Collective agreement abolishing the determination of pay by reference to age — Maintenance of established rights)

22.10.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 311/12
            
         Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 September 2011 (references for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany)) — Sabine Hennigs (C-297/10) v Eisenbahn-Bundesamt, Land Berlin (C-298/10) v Alexander Mai
   (Joined Cases C-297/10 and C-298/10) (1)
   
   (Directive 2000/78/EC - Articles 2(2) and 6(1) - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Articles 21 and 28 - Collective agreement on pay for public sector contractual employees of a Member State - Pay determined by reference to age - Collective agreement abolishing the determination of pay by reference to age - Maintenance of established rights)
   2011/C 311/17
   Language of the case: German
   
      Referring court
   
   Bundesarbeitsgericht
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicants: Sabine Hennigs (C-297/10), Land Berlin (C-298/10)
   
      Defendants: Eisenbahn-Bundesamt (C-297/10), Alexander Mai (C-298/10)
   
      Re:
   
   References for a preliminary ruling — Bundesarbeitsgericht — Interpretation of Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2010 C 83, p. 389), as implemented by Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16) — Remuneration of contractual public sector employees of a Member State — National rules providing for differences in basic pay according to age
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The principle of non-discrimination on grounds of age proclaimed in Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and given specific expression in Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation, more particularly Articles 2 and 6(1) of that directive, must be interpreted as precluding a measure laid down by a collective agreement such as that at issue in the main proceedings which provides that, within each salary group, the basic pay step of a public sector contractual employee is determined on appointment by reference to the employee’s age. The fact that European Union law precludes that measure and that it appears in a collective agreement does not interfere with the right to negotiate and conclude collective agreements recognised in Article 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Articles 2 and 6(1) of Directive 2000/78 and Article 28 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as not precluding a measure in a collective agreement, such as that at issue in the main proceedings in Case C-297/10, which replaces a system of pay leading to discrimination on grounds of age by a system of pay based on objective criteria while maintaining, for a transitional period limited in time, some of the discriminatory effects of the earlier system in order to ensure that employees in post are transferred to the new system without suffering a loss of income.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 260, 25.9.10.