CELEX: 62012TA0029
Language: en
Date: 2012-11-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-29/12: Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2012 — Bauer v OHIM — BenQ Materials (Daxon) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark Daxon — Earlier Community word mark DALTON — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

26.1.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 26/44
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2012 — Bauer v OHIM — BenQ Materials (Daxon)
   (Case T-29/12) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark Daxon - Earlier Community word mark DALTON - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2013/C 26/85
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Erika Bauer (Schaufling, Germany) (represented by: A. Merz, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: K. Klüpfel, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: BenQ Materials Corp. (Gueishan Taoyuan, Taiwan)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 November 2011 (Case R 2191/2010-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Mrs Erika Bauer and BenQ Materials Corp.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Alva Management GmbH is granted leave to be substituted for Mrs Erika Bauer as applicant;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The action is dismissed.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Alva Management is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 80, 17.3.2012.