CELEX: 62016CN0189
Language: en
Date: 2016-04-04 00:00:00
Title: Case C-189/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 4 April 2016 — Boguslawa Zaniewicz-Dybeck v Pensionsmyndigheten

13.6.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 211/34
            
         
      Request for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen (Sweden) lodged on 4 April 2016 — Boguslawa Zaniewicz-Dybeck v Pensionsmyndigheten
      (Case C-189/16)
      (2016/C 211/44)
      Language of the case: Swedish
      
         Referring court
      
      Högsta förvaltningsdomstolen
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Boguslawa Zaniewicz-Dybeck
      
         Defendant: Pensionsmyndigheten
      
         Questions referred
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Do the provisions in Article 47(1)(d) of Regulation No 1408/71 (1) mean that the insurance periods completed in another Member State, in the calculation of the Swedish guaranteed pension, can be given a pensionable value which corresponds to the average value of the Swedish periods where the competent authority undertakes a pro-rata calculation under Article 46(2) of that regulation?
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  If question 1 is answered in the negative, may the competent institution, in its calculation of the entitlement to a guaranteed pension take account of pension income which an insured person receives in another Member State without that running counter to the provisions of Regulation No 1408/71?
               
            
         (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1408/71 of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community (OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2).