CELEX: 62004TO0418
Language: en
Date: 2007-03-12 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 12 March 2007. # Confcooperative, Unione regionale della Cooperazione Friuli-Venezia Giulia Federagricole and Others v Commission of the European Communities. # Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 1429/2004 - Agriculture - Common organisation of the market in wine - Rules for the use of the names of vine varieties and their synonyms - Temporal limits as regards use - Legal persons - Persons individually concerned - Inadmissibility. # Case T-418/04.

Order of the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber) of 12 March 2007 – Confcooperative, Unione regionale della Cooperazione
            Friuli‑Venezia Giulia Federagricole and Others v Commission
      (Case T‑418/04)
      Actions for annulment – Regulation (EC) No 1429/2004 – Agriculture – Common organisation of the wine market – System for using names of grape varieties or their synonyms – Temporal limitation of use – Legal persons – Individually concerned persons – Inadmissibility
      Actions for annulment – Natural or legal persons – Measures of direct and individual concern to them (Arts 230, fourth para., EC and 249, second para., EC; Commission Regulation
         No 1429/2004, Annex I, point 103) (see para. 43-63)
      
      Re: 
      
         APPLICATION for annulment of the provision limiting to 31 March 2007 the right to use the name ‘Tocai friulano’ referred to,
                  in the form of an explanatory note, in item 103 of Annex I to Commission Regulation (EC) No 1429/2004 of 9 August 2004 amending
                  Regulation (EC) No 753/2002 laying down certain rules for applying Council Regulation (EC) No 1493/1999 as regards the description,
                  designation, presentation and protection of certain wine sector products (OJ 2004 L 263, p. 11).
               
            Operative part 
      
         
                   
               
               
                  
               
               
                  The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
               
            
         
                   
               
               
                  
               
               
                  The applicants are ordered to bear their own costs and to pay the costs of the Commission.
               
            
         
                   
               
               
                  
               
               
                  The Republic of Hungary is ordered to bear its own costs.