CELEX: 62021TN0697
Language: en
Date: 2021-10-26 00:00:00
Title: Case T-697/21: Action brought on 26 October 2021 — FC v EASO

3.1.2022   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 2/46
            
         
      Action brought on 26 October 2021 — FC v EASO
      (Case T-697/21)
      (2022/C 2/64)
      Language of the case: Greek
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: FC (represented by: B. Christianos, A. Skoulikis and G. Kelepouri, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (EASO)
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision of the Authority Empowered to Conclude Contracts of Employment (AECE) of EASO No EASO/EDD/2021/112 of 25 July 2021 rejecting the complaint brought by the applicant on 26 March 2021 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order EASO to pay all the costs incurred by the applicant.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is vitiated by infringement of the applicant’s rights of defence.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is vitiated by infringement of the right to sound administration.
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is vitiated by infringement of the applicant’s right to effective judicial protection.
               
            
                  4.
               
               
                  Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested decision is vitiated by infringement of the general principle of procedural economy.