CELEX: 62017CN0042
Language: en
Date: 2017-01-26 00:00:00
Title: Case C-42/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale (Italy) lodged on 26 January 2017 — M.A.S., M.B.

19.6.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 195/10
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte costituzionale (Italy) lodged on 26 January 2017 — M.A.S., M.B.
   (Case C-42/17)
   (2017/C 195/14)
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Referring court
   
   Corte costituzionale
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   M.A.S., M.B.
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Is Article 325(1) and (2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as requiring the criminal court to disapply national legislation on limitation periods which precludes, in a significant number of cases, the punishment of serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union, or which imposes shorter limitation periods for fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union than for fraud affecting the financial interests of the State, even where there is no sufficiently precise legal basis for such disapplication?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Is Article 325(1) and (2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as requiring the criminal court to disapply national legislation on limitation periods which precludes, in a significant number of cases, the punishment of serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union, or which imposes shorter limitation periods for fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union than for fraud affecting the financial interests of the State, even where, in the legal system of the Member State concerned, limitation periods form part of substantive criminal law and are subject to the principle of the legality of criminal proceedings?
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Is the judgment of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Justice of the European Union of 8 September 2015 in Case C-104/15, Taricco, to be interpreted as requiring the criminal court to disapply national legislation on limitation periods which precludes, in a significant number of cases, the punishment of serious fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union, or which imposes shorter limitation periods for fraud affecting the financial interests of the European Union than for fraud affecting the financial interests of the State, even where such disapplication is at variance with the overriding principles of the constitution of the Member State concerned or with the inalienable rights of the individual conferred by the constitution of the Member State?