CELEX: 62013TA0263
Language: en
Date: 2014-10-01 00:00:00
Title: Case T-263/13: Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2014 — Lausitzer Früchteverarbeitung v OHIM — Rivella International (holzmichel) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark holzmichel — Earlier international figurative marks Michel and Michel POWER — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

10.11.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 395/45
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 1 October 2014 — Lausitzer Früchteverarbeitung v OHIM — Rivella International (holzmichel)
      (Case T-263/13) (1)
      
      ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark holzmichel - Earlier international figurative marks Michel and Michel POWER - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
      (2014/C 395/55)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Lausitzer Früchteverarbeitung GmbH (Sohland an der Spree, Germany) (represented by: A. Weiß, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Rivella International AG (Rothrist, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Spintig, S. Pietzcker and A. Coordes, lawyers)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 February 2013 (Case R 1968/2011-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Rivella International AG and Lausitzer Früchteverarbeitung GmbH
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  orders Lausitzer Früchteverarbeitung GmbH to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 207, 20.7.2013.