CELEX: 
Language: en
Date: 1978-11-14 00:00:00
Title: Commission Decision of 19 October 1978 fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation to tender issued in Regulation (EEC) No 1775/78

No L 320/30                              Official Journal of the European Communities                            14. 11 . 78
                                                   COMMISSION DECISION
                                                       of 19 October 1978
               fixing the maximum export refund on barley in connection with the invitation
                                    to tender issued in Regulation (EEC) No 1775/78
                                                           (78/91 8/EEC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN                                       cles 2 and 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 2746/75 must be
COMMUNITIES,                                                         taken into account ; whereas a contract is awarded to
                                                                     any tenderer whose tender is equal to or less than the
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European                maximum export refund ;
Economic Community,
                                                                     Whereas the application of the abovementioned
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No                         criteria to the current market situation for the cereal
2727/75 of 29 October 1975 on the common organiza­                   in question results in the maximum export refund
tion of the market in cereals ('), as last amended by                being fixed at the amount specified in Article 1 ;
Regulation (EEC) No 1254/78 (2),                                     whereas the quantities of barley in respect of which
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No                         refunds are fixed amount to 1 6 000 tonnes ;
2746/75 of 29 October 1975 laying down general                       Whereas the Management Committee for Cereals has
rules for granting export refunds on cereals and                     not delivered an opinion within the time limit set by
criteria for fixing the amount of such refunds (3), and              its chairman,
in particular Article 5 thereof,
Having regard to Commission Regulation (EEC) No                      HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :
 1775/78 of 24 July 1978 on an invitation to tender for
the refund for the export of barley to Zones I, II, III,                                    Article 1
IV, V and VI (4),
Whereas in Regulation (EEC) No 1775/78 an invita­                    The maximum export refund on barley is hereby fixed
tion to tender was issued for the export refund on                   on the basis of the tenders submitted by 19 Octobei
barley ; whereas, according to the notice of invitation              1978 at 74-95 units of account per tonne.
to tender (5) accompanying that Regulation, the total
                                                                                            Article 2
quantity in respect of which the export refund may be
fixed is approximately 900 000 tonnes ;                              This Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Whereas, pursuant to Article 5 of Commission Regula­
tion (EEC) No 279/75 of 4 February 1975 laying                       Done at Brussels, 19 October 1978 .
down detailed rules for the application of the system
of tendering for export refunds on cereals (6), the
                                                                                              For the Commission
Commission, acting under the procedure laid down in
Article 26 of Regulation (EEC) No 2727/75, may                                                 Finn GUNDELACH
decide to fix a maximum export refund ; whereas in
fixing this maximum the criteria provided for in Arti­                                            Vice-President
0)  OJ  No  L 281 , 1 . 11 . 1975, p. 1.
(2) OJ  No  L 156, 14. 6. 1978,    p. 1.
(3) OJ  No  L 281 , 1 . 11 . 1975, p. 78.
(4) OJ  No  L 204, 28. 7. 1978,    p. 28.
(5) OJ  No  C  180, 29. 7. 1978,   p. 2.
(6) OJ  No  L 31 , 5. 2. 1975, p.  8.