CELEX: 62017CN0573
Language: en
Date: 2017-09-28 00:00:00
Title: Case C-573/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 28 September 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Daniel Adam Popławski

201711170041555422017/C 412/275732017CJC41220171204EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20170928181811Case C-573/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 28 September 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Daniel Adam Popławski
 ---documentbreak--- C4122017EN1810120170928EN0027181181Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 28 September 2017 — Openbaar Ministerie v Daniel Adam Popławski
   (Case C-573/17)2017/C 412/27Language of the case: Dutch
      Referring court
   
   Rechtbank Amsterdam
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie
   
      Defendant: Daniel Adam Popławski
   
      Questions referred
   
   
            1.
         
         
            If the executing judicial authority cannot interpret the national provisions implementing a framework decision in such a way that their application leads to an outcome in conformity with the framework decision, must it then, in accordance with the principle of primacy, disapply those national provisions not in conformity with that framework decision?
         
      
            2.
         
         
            Does a declaration of a Member State within the meaning of Article 28(2) of Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA (
                  1
               ) that it did not make ‘on the adoption of this Framework Decision’, but at a later date, have legal effect?
         
      (
         1
      )	Council Framework Decision 2008/909/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments in criminal matters imposing custodial sentences or measures involving deprivation of liberty for the purpose of their enforcement in the European Union (OJ 2008 L 327, p. 27).