CELEX: 52013PC0344
Language: en
Date: 2013-06-10
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union,_in the EEA Joint Committee_concerning an amendment to Annex XIII_to the EEA Agreement

|
			
		
		
		52013PC0344
		
			Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the position to be adopted, on behalf of the European Union,_in the EEA Joint Committee_concerning an amendment to Annex XIII_to the EEA Agreement /* COM/2013/0344 final - 2013/0182 (NLE) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
In order to ensure the requisite legal
security and homogeneity of the Internal Market, the EEA Joint Committee is to
integrate all the relevant EU legislation into the EEA Agreement as soon as
possible after its adoption.
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS WITH THE
INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
The
draft Decision of the EEA Joint Committee (annexed to the proposed Council
Decision) aims to amend Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement in order to
incorporate with certain adaptations for the EEA EFTA states Regulation (EC) No
1070/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009
amending Regulations (EC) No 549/2004, (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and
(EC) No 552/2004 in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the
European aviation system[1]
The adaptations for the EEA EFTA states
concern the applicability of Articles 5, 11 and 13a of Regulation (EC) No
549/2004[2]
as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009, Articles 9a(2)(c), 9a(2)(i) and
9a(5) and (6) of Regulation (EC) No 550/2004[3]
as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 and Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC)
No 551/2004[4]
as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009.
According to Article 1(3) of Regulation
(EC) No 549/2004, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009, the application
of the Regulation, as well as the application of the regulations referred to in
Article 3, are without prejudice to the rights and duties of Member States
under the 1944 Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation (‘the Chicago
Convention’). 
By virtue of Article 12 of the Chicago
Convention, the Member States undertake to keep their own regulations uniform,
to the greatest possible extent, with those established under the Chicago
Convention. Parts of the airspace governed by Norway and Iceland are high seas
airspace within the ICAO NAT region. Consequently, Norway and Iceland have, as
members of the Chicago Convention and in accordance with the established
procedures, rights, obligations and responsibilities to provide air traffic
services, where uniform rules apply in accordance with the requirements of
annexes 2 and 11 of the Chicago Convention. Furthermore, a long standing
agreement regarding the airspace serviced by Iceland enables operations that
are comparable, and serve the objectives of a functional airspace block as
defined by the SES regulations.
The services in the NAT region are based on
ICAO requirements, the Organisation’s Global Air Navigation Plan and the vision
statement on the global Air Traffic Management. There is consistency to a great
extent between the objectives of the ICAO Global Air Navigation Plan and the
regional requirements in the NAT region on the one hand, and the objectives
reflected in the SES packages I and II on the other. However, some objectives
of the SES II, e.g. aiming at solving congestion problems in the EUR region,
might not be relevant or unnecessarily burdensome in the NAT region. To this
end regional or national performance targets are more relevant to the services
provided by Iceland within the NAT region.
Regulation (EC) No 549/2004
Participation in the Single Sky
Committee (Article 5), adaptation (a):
The current adaptation allows, without
prejudice to Article 100 EEA, the EFTA States’ right to full participation in
the Committee. This adaptation is retained. Due to the increased role of the
EFTA Surveillance Authority after the incorporation of Regulation (EC) No
1070/2009, the adaptation text also would allow that the EFTA Surveillance
Authority can be present as observer in the meetings of the Committee. 
The application of Article 11 to
Iceland, adaptation (b):
In order to adapt Article 11 to the special
circumstances in Iceland, an adaptation has been added so that “Community-wide”
shall read “regional or national”.
Community wide performance targets
(Article 11):
The Commission will adopt Community-wide
performance targets. Those targets will only apply to the EFTA States once the
Commission decisions are incorporated into the EEA Agreement. 
Applicability of Article 11 to Iceland
As the current reference period ends on 31
December 2014, Article 11 shall not apply to Iceland until 1 January 2015. As
there are no performance scheme requirements currently in force for Iceland
this will give Iceland the time to prepare a scheme before the requirements
take effect and will allow the reference period for Iceland to be in sync with
the European reference period.
The designation of a Performance Review
Body (Article 11(2)), adaptation (d):
In line with the two pillar structure of
the EEA Agreement, the Performance Review Body (‘PRB’) has to be separately
designated for the EFTA States. With a view to ensuring consistency, coherence
and homogeneity, the same PRB designated for the EU Member States should be
designated for the EFTA States as well.. 
Surveillance tasks (Article 11(3)(c) and
(e)), adaptations (e) and (f):
For functional airspace blocks, which
exclusively cover the area of either one or more EFTA States or one or more EU
Member States, the EFTA Surveillance Authority or the Commission, respectively,
will carry out the tasks and exercise the powers set out in the points. 
The adaptation concerning letter (c) sets
out the rules related to functional airspace blocks which cover the area of
both one or more EFTA States and one or more EU Member States. The adaptation
upholds the two pillar system by conferring the competence to carry out tasks
regarding the EFTA States to the EFTA Surveillance Authority and the competence
regarding the EU Member States to the Commission. 
The adaptation for letter (e) is based on
the same line of reasoning as the adaptation for letter (c). This adaptation,
however, foresees that the assessment of the EFTA Surveillance Authority with
regards to functional airspace blocks which also cover the area of one or more
EU Member States shall be presented jointly to the Single Sky Committee, and
not to a separate Committee in the EFTA pillar. This adaptation is motivated by
the fact that the Single Sky Committee is highly specialised and that the
particular EFTA issues are expected to be so interlinked with the EU issues
that a separate discussion in an EFTA Committee would not be viable.
Coordination with EASA (Article 13a),
adaptation (g):
The adaptation ensures that the EFTA States
and the EFTA Surveillance Authority, like the EU Member States and the
Commission, shall coordinate with the EASA.
Regulation (EC) No 550/2004
Functional airspace blocks (Articles
9a(2)(c) and 9a(2)(i)), adaptations (a) and (b):
The NAT region has a different regulatory
obligation, as ICAO is the body proposing the set of rules governing the High
Seas. The adaptation ensures this different regulatory context is taken into
account. The management of traffic flow is conducted by the NAT states
themselves on both sides of the Atlantic. It is therefore necessary that
consistency with European or NAT Route Network is ensured by Iceland.
Dispute resolution with regard to a
cross-border functional airspace block (Article 9a(5)):
The procedure set out in Article 9a(5) will
not apply to the EFTA States, as sectoral adaptation III in Annex XIII sets out
a separate dispute resolution procedure for disputes involving one or more EFTA
States. There is therefore no need for any adaptation text.
The assessment of the functional
airspace blocks (Article 9a(6)), adaptation (c):
If a functional airspace block covers only
EU Member States or only EFTA States, Protocol 1 to the EEA Agreement will
apply, and, respectively, the Commission and the EFTA Surveillance Authority
will carry out the tasks set out in the point. The adaptation sets out the
procedure in case the functional airspace block covers both one or more EU
Member States and one or more EFTA States. It ensures that the two pillar
structure of the EEA Agreement is adhered to as far as practically possible.
Regulation (EC) No 551/2004
Network management and design (Article
6(2)), adaptations (a), (b) and (c):
This provision deals, inter alia, with the
Commission’s responsibilities and tasks in relation to network management and
design. Furthermore, the Commission is given the power to entrust tasks to a
network manager, which was done on 7 July 2011. 
The adaptation texts set out the necessary
provisions in order to designate a network mnager in the EFTA pillar by the EEA
EFTA States. Accordingly, the Standing Committee of the EFTA States is given
the tasks and functions of the Commission. Clearly, in order to facilitate that
the work carried out in the two pillars are appropriately coordinated, it is important
that the same network manager is designated for the EEA EFTA States as has been
designated for the EU Member States.
Adaptation (c) ensures that the Standing
Committee of the EFTA States nominates the Network Manager for the EEA EFTA
States. Before the Network Manager is nominated, an agreement with the relevant
manager must be concluded. 
3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL
Article 1(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No
2894/94 concerning arrangements for implementing the EEA Agreement provides
that the Council establishes the position to be adopted on the Union’s behalf
on such Decisions, on a proposal from the Commission. 
The Commission submits the Draft Decision
of the EEA Joint Committee for adoption by the Council as the Union’s position.
The Commission would hope to be able to present it in the EEA Joint Committee
at the earliest possible opportunity.
2013/0182 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
on the position to be adopted, on behalf
of the European Union,
in the EEA Joint Committee
concerning an amendment to Annex XIII
to the EEA Agreement
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning
of the European Union, and in particular Article 100(2),
in conjunction with Article 218(9) thereof,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No
2894/94 of 28 November 1994 concerning arrangements for implementing the
Agreement on the European Economic Area[5],
and in particular Article 1(3) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
Whereas:
(1)       The Agreement on the
European Economic Area[6]
(“the EEA Agreement”) entered into force on 1 January 1994.
(2)       Pursuant to Article 98 of
the EEA Agreement, the EEA Joint Committee may decide to amend, inter alia, Annex
XIII thereto.
(3)       Annex XIII to the EEA
Agreement contains specific provisions on all modes of transport.
(4)       Regulation (EC) No
1070/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009
amending Regulations (EC) No 549/2004, (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and
(EC) No 552/2004 in order to improve the performance and sustainability of the
European aviation system[7]
is to be incorporated into the EEA Agreement with certain adaptations for the
EEA EFTA states.
(5)       The adaptations for the
EEA EFTA states concern the applicability of Articles 5, 11 and 13a of
Regulation (EC) No 549/2004[8]
as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009, Articles 9a(2)(c), 9a(2)(i) and
9a(5) and (6) of Regulation (EC) No 550/2004[9]
as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 and Article 6(2) of Regulation (EC)
No 551/2004[10]
as amended by Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009.
(6)       Annex XIII to the EEA
Agreement should therefore be amended accordingly.
(7)       The position of the Union
in the EEA Joint Committee should be based on the attached draft Decision,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: 
Article 1
The position to be adopted, on behalf of
the European Union, in the EEA Joint Committee on the proposed amendment to Annex
XIII to the EEA Agreement shall be based on the draft Decision of the
EEA Joint Committee attached to this Decision.
Article 2
This Decision shall enter into force on the
day of its adoption.
Done at Brussels, 
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
Annex
DECISION
OF THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE 
No
of
amending
Annex XIII (Transport) to the EEA Agreement
THE EEA JOINT COMMITTEE,
Having regard to the Agreement on the
European Economic Area (“the EEA Agreement”), and in particular Article 98
thereof,
Whereas:
(1)                   
Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 of the European
Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 amending Regulations (EC) No
549/2004, (EC) No 550/2004, (EC) No 551/2004 and (EC) No 552/2004 in order to
improve the performance and sustainability of the European aviation system[11] is to be incorporated into the
EEA Agreement.
(2)                   
The airspace where Iceland is responsible for
the provision of air traffic services is fully within the ICAO NAT region,
where regional planning and regional agreements have been established, enabling
FAB-like functioning, and serve the operational needs and requirements which
differ from the ICAO EUR and AFI regions. 
(3)                   
Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement should therefore
be amended accordingly,
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Annex XIII to the EEA Agreement shall be
amended as follows:
1.           The text of point 66t (Regulation
(EC) No 549/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) shall be
amended as follows:
(i)      The
following text is added:
‘, as amended by:
-        32009 R 1070: Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 of the European Parliament and of the
Council of 21 October 2009 (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 34).’
(ii)     The text of adaptation (a) is
replaced by the following:
‘The following paragraphs shall be added in
Article 5:
“6.     The EFTA States shall participate
fully in the committee established pursuant to paragraph 1, except for the
right to vote.
7.       The EFTA Surveillance Authority shall
have observer status in the Single Sky Committee.”’
(iii)     Adaptation (b) is renumbered as
adaptation (h).
(iv)    The following adaptations are inserted:
‘(b)    In Article 11, the words
“Community-wide” shall read “regional or national” with regard to Iceland.
(c)     With regard to Iceland, Article 11
shall apply as of 1 January 2015.
(d)     The first sentence of Article 11(2)
shall read as follows:
“The Standing Committee of the EFTA States may
designate Eurocontrol or another impartial and competent body to act as a
“performance review body”. If the Commission has designated a performance
review body, the Standing Committee of the EFTA States shall endeavour to
designate the same entity under similar conditions to fulfil the same tasks in
regard to the EFTA States.”
(e)     In Article 11(3)(c) the following
paragraph shall be added:
“If a functional airspace block covers the
airspace of one or more EU Member States and one or more EFTA States, the tasks
and powers set out in this point shall be carried out and exercised by the
Commission with regard to the EU Member States and by the EFTA Surveillance
Authority with regard to the EFTA States. The Commission and the EFTA
Surveillance Authority shall in this regard cooperate with a view to adopting
identical positions.”
(f)      In Article 11(3)(e) the following
paragraph shall be added:
“If the assessment
concerns performance targets, which relate to one or more EU Member States and
one or more EFTA States, the assessment shall be carried out by the EFTA
Surveillance Authority with regard to the EFTA States and by the Commission
with regard to the EU Member States. The Commission and the EFTA Surveillance
Authority shall cooperate with a view to presenting jointly the results to the
Single Sky Committee.”
(g)     In Article 13a, with regards to the
EFTA States, “Member States and the Commission” shall read “the EFTA States and
the EFTA Surveillance Authority”.’
2.           The text of point 66u (Regulation
(EC) No 550/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) shall be
amended as follows:
(i)      The following text is added:
‘, as amended by:
-        32009 R 1070: Regulation (EC)
No 1070/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009
(OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 34).’
(ii)     Adaptations (a), (b), (c) and (d) are
renumbered as adaptations (d), (e), (f) and (g).
(iii)     The following adaptations are
inserted:
‘(a)    With regard to Iceland Article
9a(2)(c) shall read as follows:
“ensure consistency with the European route
network established in accordance with Article 6 of the airspace Regulation or
the route network established in the ICAO NAT region;”
(b)     With regard to Iceland Article
9a(2)(i) shall read as follows:
“facilitate consistency with regional or
national performance targets.”
(c)     In Article 9a(6) the following
paragraph shall be added:
“The Commission and the EFTA Surveillance
Authority shall assess the fulfilment of the requirements set out in paragraph
2 by functional airspace blocks involving one or more EU Member States and one
or more EFTA States, and shall cooperate with a view to presenting a joint
result to the Single Sky Committee for discussion. If the Commission and the
EFTA Surveillance Authority find that an airspace block does not fulfil the
requirements they shall engage in a dialogue with the concerned EU Member
States and the concerned EFTA States respectively with the aim of reaching a
consensus on the measures necessary to rectify the situation.”’
3.           The text of point 66v (Regulation
(EC) No 551/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council) shall be
amended as follows:
(i)      The following text is added:
‘, as amended by:
–              
32009 R 1070:
Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
21 October 2009 (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 34).’
(ii)     The texts of adaptations (a) and (b)
are deleted.
(iii)     Adaptation (c) is renumbered as
adaptation (d).
(iv)    The following adaptations are
inserted:
‘(a)    In Article 6(2), the word ”Commission”
shall, with regard to the EFTA States, be replaced by the words “Standing
Committee of the EFTA States”.
(b)     In Article 6(2)(b) third subparagraph,
the words “after consultation of the Single Sky Committee and” shall, with
regard to the EFTA States, not apply.
(c)     In Article 6(2)(b) third subparagraph,
the following shall be added:
“If the Commission has nominated a Network
Manager, the Standing Committee of the EFTA States shall endeavour to designate
the same entity under similar conditions to fulfil the same tasks in regard to
the EFTA States.”’
4.           The following is added in point
66w (Regulation (EC) No 552/2004 of the European Parliament and of the
Council):
‘, as amended by:
–              
32009 R 1070:
Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of
21 October 2009 (OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 34).’
Article 2
The texts of Regulation (EC) No 1070/2009
in the Icelandic and Norwegian languages, to be published in the EEA Supplement
to the Official Journal of the European Union, shall be authentic.
Article 3
This Decision shall enter into force on […],
provided that all the notifications under Article 103(1) of the EEA Agreement
have been made*.
Article 4
This Decision shall be published in the EEA
Section of, and in the EEA Supplement to, the Official Journal of the
European Union.
Done at Brussels, .
For
the EEA Joint Committee
ThePresident
            
            
The Secretaries
to the EEA Joint Committee

(5)                
[1]               OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 34.
(6)                
[2]               OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 1.
(7)                
[3]               OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 10.
(8)                
[4]               OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 20.
[5]               OJ L 305, 30.11.1994, p. 6.
[6]               OJ L 1, 3.1.1994, p. 3. 
[7]               OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 34.
[8]               OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 1.
[9]               OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 10.
[10]             OJ L 96, 31.3.2004, p. 20.
[11]             OJ L 300, 14.11.2009, p. 34.
*               [No constitutional requirements indicated.]
[Constitutional requirements indicated.]