CELEX: 62017TN0034
Language: en
Date: 2017-01-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-34/17: Action brought on 20 January 2017 — Skyleader v EUIPO — Sky International (SKYLEADER)

13.3.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 78/37
            
         Action brought on 20 January 2017 — Skyleader v EUIPO — Sky International (SKYLEADER)
   (Case T-34/17)
   (2017/C 078/51)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Skyleader a.s. (Ústí nad Labem, Czech Republic) (represented by: K. Malmstedt, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sky International AG (Zug, Switzerland)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘SKYLEADER’ — EU trade mark No 6 347 827
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 Novembre 2016 in Case R 805/2016-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision No 11084 C of the Cancellation Division and the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO and Sky International to pay the costs of the proceedings both before the General Court and EUIPO.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of EU law and of substantial procedural measures of EU law;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of principles of good and sound administration;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Rule 45(5) of Regulation No 2868/95.