CELEX: 62011FB0023
Language: en
Date: 2012-02-08 00:00:00
Title: Case F-23/11: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 8 February 2012 — AY v Council (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2010 promotion exercise — Consideration of comparative merits — Failure to take into account further training and certification — Error of law)

28.4.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 126/26
            
         Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 8 February 2012 — AY v Council
   (Case F-23/11) (1)
   
   (Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2010 promotion exercise - Consideration of comparative merits - Failure to take into account further training and certification - Error of law)
   2012/C 126/49
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: AY (Bousval, Belgium) (represented initially by É. Boigelot and S. Woog, then by É. Boigelot, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and J. Herrmann, agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action for annulment of the decision of the Council not to include the applicant in the list of officials promoted to grade AST 9 in the 2010 promotion exercise and compensation for the non-material harm suffered.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               annuls the decision of the Council of the European Union not to promote AY to grade AST 9 in the 2010 promotion exercise;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               declares that there is no need to adjudicate on AY’s alternative heads of claim;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               dismisses AY’s action as to the remainder;
            
         
               4.
            
            
               orders the Council of the European Union to pay all costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ 30.7.2011 C 226, p. 31.