CELEX: C2003/226/34
Language: en
Date: 2003-09-20 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 July 2003 in Case T-81/02 Margot Wagemann-Reuter v Court of Auditors of the European Communities (Staff case — Leave on personal grounds — Vacant post — Upgrading of post — Reinstatement)

C 226/16               EN                         Official Journal of the European Union                                            20.9.2003
                                                        COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                               represented by D. Voillemot and O. Prost, lawyers, supported
                                                                          by the Kingdom of Spain (Agent: L. Fraguas Gadea), against
                         of 17 June 2003                                  Commission of the European Communities (Agents:
                                                                          V. Kreuschitz, S. Meany and A.P. Bentley), supported by TNC
in Case T-385/00 Jean-Paul Seiller v European Investment                  Kazchrome, established in Almaty (Kazakhstan) and by Alloy
                              Bank (1)                                    2000 SA, established in Strassen (Luxembourg), represented by
                                                                          J. Flynn, J. Magnin and S. Mills — application for partial annul-
(European Investment Bank — Staff — Admissibility —                       ment of Commission Decision 2001/230/EC of 21 February
Clarity of the application — Confirmatory act — Action                    2001 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning
brought late — Previous conciliation procedure — Pension                  imports of ferro-silicon originating in Brazil, the People's
rights — Luxembourg law — Settlement — Fraudulent mis-                    Republic of China, Kazakhstan, Russia, Ukraine and
                          representation)                                 Venezuela (OJ 2001 L 84, p. 36) in so far it concerns imports
                                                                          originating in the People's Republic of China, Russia, Ukraine
                         (2003/C 226/32)                                  and Kazakhstan — the Court of First Instance (Second
                                                                          Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of N.J. Forwood,
                   (Language of the case: French)                         President, J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi, A.W.H. Meij and M. Vilaras,
                                                                          Judges; Registrar: J. Palacio Gonzalez, Principal Administrator,
In Case T-385/00 Jean-Paul Seiller, residing in Luxembourg,               has given a judgment on 8 July 2003, in which it:
represented by D. Chouanier and L. Thielen, lawyers, with
an address for service in Luxembourg, against European
Investment Bank (Agents: E. Uhlmann, C. Gómez de la Cruz                  1.    Dismissed the action;
and P. Mousel) — application for payment of the sum of
LUF 4779652, together with interest, due to him in respect of
his pension rights — the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber),         2.    Ordered the applicants to bear their own costs and, jointly and
composed of R. García-Valdecasas, President, and P. Lindh and                   severally, those incurred by the Commission and by the interve-
J.D. Cooke, Judges; D. Christensen, Administrator, for the                      ners TNC Kazchrome and Alloy 2000, including the costs of the
Registrar, has given a judgment on 17 June 2003 in which it:                    interlocutory proceedings;
                                                                          3.    Ordered the Kingdom of Spain, intervener, to bear its own costs.
1.   Dismisses the application;
2.   Orders the applicant to bear his own costs and to pay those
     incurred by the EIB.                                                 (1) OJ No C 227 of 11.8.01.
(1) OJ C 61 of 24 February 2001.
                                                                              JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                                      of 17 July 2003
    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                               in Case T-81/02 Margot Wagemann-Reuter v Court of
                                                                                    Auditors of the European Communities (1)
                          of 8 July 2003
                                                                          (Staff case — Leave on personal grounds — Vacant post —
in Case T-132/01: Euroalliages and Others v Commission                                   Upgrading of post — Reinstatement)
               of the European Communities (1)
                                                                                                     (2003/C 226/34)
(Dumping — Decision terminating expiry review —
      Community interest — Application for annulment)                                           (Language of the case: French)
                         (2003/C 226/33)
                                                                          In Case T-81/02 Margot Wagemann-Reuter, an official of the
                   (Language of the case: French)                         Court of Auditors of the European Communities, residing in
                                                                          Luxembourg, represented by M.-A. Lucas, lawyer, with an
In Case T-132/01: Euroalliages, established in Brussels                   address for service in Luxembourg, against the Court of
(Belgium), Péchiney électrométallurgie, established in                    Auditors of the European Communities (Agents: originally,
Courbevoie (France), Vargön Alloys AB, established in Vargön              J.-M. Stenier, P. Giusta and B. Schäfer, later J.-M. Stenier,
(Sweden), Ferroatlántica, SL, established in Madrid (Spain),              M. Bavendam and I. Riagáin) — application for, first,
 ---pagebreak--- 20.9.2003              EN                         Official Journal of the European Union                                           C 226/17
annulment of the implied decision of the Court of Auditors                ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
rejecting the applicant's request for reinstatement following                                         INSTANCE
leave on personal grounds of 22 January 2001, and the Court
of Auditors" decision of 12 December 2001 rejecting the com-                                       of 15 May 2003
plaint lodged by the applicant on 14 August 2001 and, second,
compensation for material and non-material loss allegedly suf-            in Case T-47/03 R: Jose Maria Sison v Council of the
fered by the applicant, — the Court of First Instance (R. García-                                  European Union
Valdecasas, single Judge); J. Plingers, Administrator, for the
Registrar, has given a judgment on 17 July 2003, in which it:             (Interlocutory proceedings — Restrictive measures with a
                                                                          view to combating terrorism — Freezing of funds —
                                                                          Disallowance of benefits — Partial inadmissibility of the
1.   Dismisses the application;                                                       orders sought — Urgency — Absence)
                                                                                                   (2003/C 226/36)
2.   Orders the parties to bear their own costs.
                                                                                              (Language of the case: English)
                                                                          In Case T-47/03 R, Jose Maria Sison, resident in Utrecht (the
(1) OJ No C 131 of 1 June 2002.                                           Netherlands), represented by J. Fermon, A. Comte, H.E. Schultz,
                                                                          D. Gurses, T. Olsson and J. Lamchek, lawyers, against Council
                                                                          of the European Union (Agents: M. Vitsentzatos and
                                                                          M. Bishop): Application for, first, an order suspending the
                                                                          operation of Decision 2002/974/EC implementing Article 2
                                                                          (3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive mea-
                                                                          sures directed against certain persons and entities with a view
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                          to combating terrorism and repealing Decision 2002/848/EC
                                                                          (OJ 2002 L 337, p. 85) in so far as it mentions the name of the
                         of 25 June 2003                                  applicant, second, an order requesting the Council not to
                                                                          include the applicant in any new decision implementing
in Case T-287/02 Asian Institute of Technology v                          Article 2(3) of Regulation No 2580/2001 and, third, an order
       Commission of the European Communities (1)                         requesting the Council to inform all Member States that the
                                                                          restrictive measures adopted in relation to the applicant have
(Action for annulment — Decision to conclude a research                   no legal basis, the President of the Court of First Instance made
            contract — Time-limit — Inadmissible)                         an order on 15 May 2003, the operative part of which is as
                                                                          follows:
                         (2003/C 226/35)
                   (Language of the case: French)
                                                                          1.   The application for interim relief is dismissed;
In Case T-287/02: Asian Institute of Technology (AIT), whose              2.   Costs are reserved.
registered office is at Pathumthani (Thailand), represented by
H. Teissier du Cros, lawyer, with an address for service in
Luxembourg, against Commission of the European
Communities (Agents: P. Kuijper and B. Schöfer) — application
for annulment of the decision of the Commission of 4 July
2000 to conclude a research contract under the ‘Asia-Invest’
programme with the Center for Energy-Environment Research
and Development — the Court of First Instance (Fifth
Chamber), composed of R. Garcia-Valdecasas, President,                          ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
P. Lindh and J.D. Cooke, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has given
a judgment on 25 June 2003, in which it:                                                           of 16 May 2003
                                                                          in Case T-140/03: Forum 187 ASBL v Commission of the
                                                                                             European Communities (1)
1.   Dismisses the application as inadmissible.
                                                                                               (Declining of jurisdiction)
2.   Orders the applicant to pay its own costs and those incurred by
     the Commission.                                                                               (2003/C 226/37)
                                                                                              (Language of the case: English)
(1) OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.                                                 In Case T-140/03, Forum 187 ASBL, represented by A. Sutton
                                                                          and J. Killick, Barristers, v Commission of the European
                                                                          Communities (Agents: V. Di Bucci, R. Lyal and G. Rozet):