CELEX: 62013CB0535
Language: en
Date: 2014-07-17 00:00:00
Title: Case C-535/13: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon — Greece) — Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi AE (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Trade marks — Right of the proprietor of a trade mark to oppose the placing on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) of goods bearing that mark without his consent)

17.11.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 409/25
            
         Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 17 July 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon — Greece) — Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha v Maria Patmanidi AE
   (Case C-535/13) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Trade marks - Right of the proprietor of a trade mark to oppose the placing on the market within the European Economic Area (EEA) of goods bearing that mark without his consent))
   2014/C 409/37
   Language of the case: Greek
   
      Referring court
   
   Monomeles Protodikeio Athinon
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Honda Giken Kogyo Kabushiki Kaisha
   
      Defendant: Maria Patmanidi AE
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   Articles 5 and 7 of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, as amended by the Agreement on the European Economic Area of 2 May 1992, and Articles 9 and 13 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark must be interpreted as meaning that the proprietor of a trade mark may oppose the initial placing on the market within the European Economic Area or the European Union of goods bearing that mark without his consent.
   
      (1)  OJ C 377, 21.12.2013.