CELEX: 62013TA0196
Language: en
Date: 2014-07-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-196/13: Judgment of the General Court of 16 July 2014  — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Stal-Florez Botero (la nana) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark ‘la nana’  — Earlier national word mark NANA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — No genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009)

1.9.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 292/43
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 16 July 2014 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Stal-Florez Botero (la nana)
   (Case T-196/13) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark ‘la nana’ - Earlier national word mark NANA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))
   2014/C 292/52
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Pohlmann, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Lina M. Stal-Florez Botero (Maarssen, Netherlands)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 January 2013 (Case R 300/2012-1) relating to invalidity proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Lina M. Stal-Florez Botero.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 171, 15.6.2013.