CELEX: 52000PC0085
Language: en
Date: 2000-02-16
Title: Proposal for a Council Decision amending Decisions 97/375/EC, 97/510/EC, 98/20/EC, 98/23/EC and 98/161/EC

Avis juridique important

|

52000PC0085

Proposal for a Council Decision amending Decisions 97/375/EC, 97/510/EC, 98/20/EC, 98/23/EC and 98/161/EC  /* COM/2000/0085 final */  

Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION amending Decisions 97/375/EC, 97/510/EC, 98/20/EC, 98/23/EC and 98/161/EC(presented by the Commission)EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1. Under Article 27 of the Sixth Council Directive of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, [1] the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce special measures for derogation from the provisions of the Directive, in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance.[1]   OJ L 145, 13.6.1977, p.1. Directive last amended by Directive 99/85/EC (OJ L 277, 28.10.1999, p.34).2. As a rule, such authorisations are given on a temporary basis, so that an assessment can be made after a few years as to whether the special measures are appropriate and effective.3. Five Decisions taken by the Council under Article 27 of the Sixth Directive expire on 31 December 1999. These are as follows:- Decision 97/375/EC [2] authorising the United Kingdom to extend the application of an optional scheme for enterprises with an annual turnover below a certain ceiling, whereby tax is assessed on the basis of payments made and received. This cash accounting scheme, designed to simplify the procedure for charging the tax, derogates from Article 17 of the Directive;[2]   OJ L 158, 17.6.1997, p.43.- Decision 97/510/EC [3] authorising Ireland to apply a measure derogating from Article 21 of the Directive to allow it to combat tax evasion and tax fraud in the real-estate sector;[3]   OJ L 214, 6.8.1997, p.37.- Decision 98/20/EC [4] authorising the Kingdom of the Netherlands to extend the application in the ready-to-wear clothing industry of a scheme for shifting to the clothing firm (the contractor) the subcontractor's obligation to pay VAT to the tax authorities. This scheme, which should enable the Netherlands to counter effectively the fraud encountered in this sector, derogates from Article 21 of the Directive;[4]   OJ L 8, 14.1.1998, p.16.- Decision 98/23/EC [5] authorising the United Kingdom to extend application of a measure allowing the appropriate authorities, under certain conditions, to direct that the open-market value be taken as the taxable amount for intra-Community acquisitions of goods where there are family, legal or business links between the person acquiring the goods and the supplier. This anti-avoidance measure represents a derogation from Article 28e(1) of the Directive;[5]   OJ L 8, 14.1.1998, p.24.- Decision 98/161/EC [6] authorising the Kingdom of the Netherlands to apply a special taxation scheme for used and waste materials. This scheme, which should enable the Netherlands to fight effectively against the fraud encountered in this sector, derogates from Articles 2 and 28a(1) of the Directive.[6]   OJ L 53, 24.2.1998, p.19.4. By letters received by the Secretariat-General on 11 November 1999, Ireland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom requested authorisation to extend application of these measures by four years.5. In addition, as regards Decision 97/375/EC (authorising a derogation from Article 17(1)), the United Kingdom requested that the ceiling of GBP 400 000 be raised to GBP 600 000. The measure in question forms part of an optional system of taxation for firms with an annual turnover not higher than GBP 400 000. Raising the ceiling for the simplified scheme, and thus also for the derogation which forms an integral part of it, will allow a greater number of firms to opt for the scheme.6. In accordance with Article 27(3) of the Sixth Directive, the Commission informed the other Member States by letter of 16 December 1999 of the requests made by Ireland, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.7. In the Commission's view, the matters of law and of fact which justified the application of the special measures in question have not changed and still pertain.8. In view of the above, the Commission considers that the requests for extension from the Member States concerned should be granted and that the Decisions referred to above should therefore be extended to 31 December 2003.9. The Commission believes that a favourable response can also be given to the United Kingdom's request to raise the threshold under the derogation, as the aim - to allow a greater number of taxable firms to opt for the application of a simplified scheme - satisfies the conditions of Article 27.Proposal for aCOUNCIL DECISIONamending Decisions 97/375/EC, 97/510/EC, 98/20/EC, 98/23/EC and 98/161/ECTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Community,Having regard to the Sixth Council Directive (77/388/EEC) of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes - Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment, [7] and in particular Article 27 thereof,[7]   OJ L 145, 13.6.1977, p.1. Directive last amended by Directive 99/85/EC (OJ L 277, 28.10.1999, p.34).Having regard to the proposal from the Commission, [8][8]  OJ C     , p.  .Whereas:(1) Under Article 27(1) of the Sixth VAT Directive, the Council, acting unanimously on a proposal from the Commission, may authorise any Member State to introduce special measures for derogation from the provisions of the Directive, in order to simplify the procedure for charging the tax or to prevent certain types of tax evasion or avoidance.(2) By letters received by the Secretariat-General of the Commission on 11 November 1999, Ireland, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom requested the extension until 31 December 2003 of several authorisations originally granted by the Council until 31 December 1999.(3) Ireland requested an extension of Decision 97/510/EC [9] authorising it to apply a measure derogating from Article 21 of the Sixth Directive which enabled it to combat tax evasion and tax fraud in the real-estate sector.[9]   OJ L 214, 6.8.1997, p.37.(4) The Netherlands requested the extension of two Decisions: Decision 98/20/EC [10] allowing the application in the ready-to-wear clothing industry of a scheme for shifting to the tax authorities to the clothing firm (the contractor) the subcontractor's obligation to pay VAT, and Decision 98/161/EC [11] allowing the application of a special taxation scheme for used and waste materials. Both of these measures should allow the effective combating of fraud in the sectors concerned.[10]   OJ L 8, 14.1.1998, p.16.[11]   OJ L 53, 24.2.1998, p.19.(5) The United Kingdom asked for the extension of Decision 98/23/EC [12] allowing the appropriate authorities, under certain conditions, to direct that the open-market value be taken as the taxable amount for intra-Community acquisitions of goods where there are family, legal or business links between the person acquiring the goods and the supplier. This special measure is an anti-avoidance measure derogating from Article 28e(1) of the Sixth Directive.[12]   OJ L 8, 14.1.1998, p.24.(6) The United Kingdom also requested an extension of Decision 97/375/EC [13] authorising it to extend the application of an optional cash accounting scheme for enterprises with an annual turnover below a certain ceiling, whereby tax is assessed on the basis of payments made and received. In addition, the United Kingdom requests to be able to raise the ceiling of GBP 400 000 to GBP 600 000. Raising the ceiling for the simplified scheme, and thus also for the derogation which forms an integral part of it, will allow a greater number of firms to opt for the scheme.[13]   OJ L 158, 17.6.1997, p.43.(7) The matters of law and of fact which justified the application of the special measures in question have not changed and still pertain.(8) The authorisations should therefore be extended until 31 December 2003 and the ceiling of GBP 400 000 in Article 1 of Decision 97/375/EC should be raised to GBP 600 000.(9) The derogations in question have no impact on the European Communities' own resources from valued added tax,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1Article 1 of Decision 97/375/EC is replaced by the following:"By way of derogation from the provisions of Article 17(1) of Directive 77/388/EEC, the United Kingdom is hereby authorised, until 31 December 2003, to provide within an optional scheme that enterprises with an annual turnover not higher than GBP 600 000 must postpone the right of deduction of tax until it has been paid to the supplier."Article 2In Article 1 of Decision 97/510/EC, the date 31 December 1999 is replaced by 31 December 2003.Article 3In Article 1 of Decision 98/20/EC, the date 31 December 1999 is replaced by 31 December 2003.Article 4In Article 1 of Decision 98/23/EC, the date 31 December 1999 is replaced by 31 December 2003.Article 5In Article 1 of Decision 98/161/EC, the date 31 December 1999 is replaced by 31 December 2003.Article 6This Decision is addressed to Ireland, the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the United Kingdom.Done at Brussels, For the Council The President