CELEX: C2006/022/25
Language: en
Date: 2006-01-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-346/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of  24 November 2005  — Sadas v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark ARTHUR ET FELICIE — Earlier figurative mark including the word element  Arthur  — Relative ground of refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

28.1.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 22/13
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 24 November 2005 — Sadas v OHIM
   (Case T-346/04) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark ARTHUR ET FELICIE - Earlier figurative mark including the word element 'Arthur' - Relative ground of refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2006/C 22/25)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicant(s): Sadas SA (Tourcoing, France) (represented by: A. Bertrand, lawyer)
   
      Defendant(s): Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and G. Schneider, Agents)
   
      Other party or parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: LTJ Diffusion SA (Colombes, France) (represented by: F. Fajgenbaum and S. Lederman, lawyers)
   Action
   brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 June 2004 (Case R 393/2003-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Sadas SA and LTJ Diffusion SA
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by the intervener;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the intervener to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 262, 23.10.2004.