CELEX: 62020TN0630
Language: en
Date: 2020-10-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-630/20: Action brought on 14 October 2020 — MW v Parliament

11.1.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 9/24
            
         
      Action brought on 14 October 2020 — MW v Parliament
      (Case T-630/20)
      (2021/C 9/35)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: MW (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Parliament
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the General Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  declare the present application admissible and well founded;
                  and, consequently,
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision of 11 December 2019 by which the applicant’s temporary contract for an indefinite period was terminated and her activities were suspended;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the payment of compensation in respect of the material damage suffered, which amounts to EUR 10 000, in addition to the amounts to be calculated for school fees and compensation in respect of the non-material damage, estimated in the amount of EUR 30 000;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to pay all the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 80 of the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Union leading to an error of assessment and misuse of powers. The applicant argues, inter alia, that the defendant failed to take into consideration all the factors which may affect its decision.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging a violation of the right to fair and just working conditions, misuse of powers and violation of the prohibition on any form of psychological harassment provided for in Articles 12 and 12a of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.