CELEX: 62006FA0020
Language: en
Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00
Title: Case F-20/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — de Luca v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Appointment — Officials advancing to a higher function group by open competition — Candidate placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment — Classification in grade pursuant to the new, less favourable rules — Article 5(2) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

4.12.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 328/60
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 — de Luca v Commission
   (Case F-20/06) (1)
   
   (Civil service - Officials - Appointment - Officials advancing to a higher function group by open competition - Candidate placed on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Transitional rules governing classification in grade at the time of recruitment - Classification in grade pursuant to the new, less favourable rules - Article 5(2) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)
   2010/C 328/96
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Patricia de Luca (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, acting as Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Arpio Santacruz and M. Simm, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Annulment of the Commission’s decision of 23 February 2005 appointing the applicant, an official already graded at A*10 and a successful candidate in a competition for grades A5/A4, to a post as an administrator in the Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security in so far as it alters her classification in grade from A*10 to A*9
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the application;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders each party to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 108, 6.5.2006, p. 31.