CELEX: C2000/079/61
Language: en
Date: 2000-03-18 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 7 December 1999 in Case T-108/99, Gemma Reggimenti v European Parliament (Officials — Actions — Time-limits — Public policy — Distinction between complaint and request under Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Rejection of complaint — Late action — Inadmissible)

18.3.2000               EN                     Official Journal of the European Communities                                        C 79/27
Benkelberg, Rechtsanwalt, Emmerich and Kleve, with an                     2. There is no need to adjudicate on the Council’s application for
address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Faltz                    leave to intervene.
and Kremer, 6 Rue Heinrich Heine, against the Office for
Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade marks and designs)            3. The parties shall bear their own costs.
(Agents: Detlef Schennen and Emmanuel Joly) — application
for annulment of the decision of the first Board of Appeal of             4. The Council, which has applied to intervene, shall bear its own
the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (trade                    costs.
marks and designs) of 26 January 1999 (Case R 14/1998-1),
notified to the applicant on 1 February 1999 — the Court of
First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung,                  (1) OJ 1999 C 160.
President, and A. Potocki and W.H. Meij, Judges; H. Jung,
Registrar, has made an order on 8 December 1999, the
operative part of which is as follows:
1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2. The applicant is ordered to pay the costs.
                                                                                ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
(1) OJ C 204 of 17.7.1999.                                                                        of 7 December 1999
                                                                          in Case T-108/99, Gemma Reggimenti v European Parlia-
                                                                                                        ment (1)
                                                                          (Officials — Actions — Time-limits — Public policy —
                                                                          Distinction between complaint and request under
                                                                          Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations — Rejection of
                                                                                     complaint — Late action — Inadmissible)
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                                     (2000/C 79/61)
                       of 1 December 1999
in Case T-81/99: Lily Karoline Schuerer v Commission of                                       (Language of the case: French)
                  the European Communities (1)
                                                                          In Case T-108/99, Gemma Reggimenti, official of the European
(Officials — Pensions — Weighting — Change of capital of                  Parliament, residing in Brussels, represented by Claudine
a Member State — Manifest inadmissibility — Action                        Junion, of the Brussels Bar, with an address for service in
                   manifestly unfounded in law)                           Luxembourg at the Chambers of Christine Nabozny, 3 Rue
                                                                          Mathias Tresch, against European Parliament (Agents: Hannu
                                                                          von Hertzen and Yannis Pantalis) — application for annulment
                           (2000/C 79/60)                                 of the decision of the European Parliament of 18 June 1998
                                                                          refusing the payment, on behalf of and in the name of the
                                                                          applicant, of family allowances, to which she is entitled in
                                                                          respect of her child, to third parties who have the child in their
                    (Language of the case: German)
                                                                          care, for the period from 29 August to 31 December 1997 —
                                                                          the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber), composed of
In Case T-81/99: Lily Karoline Schuerer, former official of the           K. Lenaerts, President, and J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges;
Commission of the European Communities, represented by                    H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 7 December 1999,
Hermann J. Winzen, Rechtsanwalt, Munich, with an address                  the operative part of which is as follows:
for service in Luxembourg at the address of Marco Steil, 12
rue d’Anvers, against Commission of the European Communi-                 1. The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
ties — application for compensation amounting to
DEM 17 677,57, together with interest — the Court of First                2. The parties shall bear their own costs.
Instance (Third Chamber), composed of K. Lenaerts, President,
J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order
on 1 December 1999, the operative part of which is as follows:            (1) OJ C 226 of 7.8.1999.
1. The action is dismissed in part as manifestly inadmissible and,
    for the rest, as manifestly unfounded in law.