CELEX: C2001/095/28
Language: en
Date: 2001-03-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-381/00: Action brought on 20 December 2000 by Franz-Martin Wasmeier against the Commission of the European Communities

C 95/14                 EN                     Official Journal of the European Communities                                      24.3.2001
1.    The operation of the decision of the Commission of 9 March          Action brought on 20 December 2000 by Franz-Martin
      2000 relating to the withdrawal of marketing authorisations         Wasmeier against the Commission of the European Com-
      for medicinal products for human use which contain amfepra-                                      munities
      mone [C(2000) 453] is suspended in relation to the applicant.
                                                                                                   (Case T-381/00)
2.    Costs are reserved.
                                                                                                    (2001/C 95/28)
                                                                                            (Language of the case: German)
                                                                          An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
                                                                          ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                European Communities on 20 December 2000 by Franz-
                                                                          Martin Wasmeier, of Munich (Germany), represented by
                                                                          Gerhard Maier, of Messrs Kalaitzis, Türck & Maier, Bernau am
                      of 15 November 2000                                 Chiemsee (Germany).
in Case T-157/00: Nicole Robert v European Parliament (1)                 The applicant claims that the Court should:
                                                                          —     annul the Commission’s decision of 7.9.2000 concerning
(Officials — Prior administrative complaint — Time-limits
                                                                                the applicant’s complaint and the Commission’s decision
— Action brought prior to rejection of the complaint —
                                                                                of 24.9.1999 concerning his classification in grade A 7;
                          Inadmissibility)
                                                                          —     order the Commission to adopt a fresh decision concern-
                           (2001/C 95/27)                                       ing the applicant’s classification in grade, accompanied
                                                                                by a comprehensive statement of reasons;
                    (Language of the case: French)                        —     order the Commission to pay the costs.
In Case T-157/00: Nicole Robert, an official of the European
Parliament, residing at Strassen (Luxembourg), represented by             Pleas in law and main arguments
A. Lorang, of the Luxembourg Bar, with an address for service
in Luxembourg at the latter’s Chambers, 2 Rue des Dahlias,
v European Parliament (Agents: Y. Pantalis and D. Moore) —                Having sat an open competition, the applicant was appointed
application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision not to             an official of the Commission and classified in grade A 7, step
promote the applicant to grade B 1 in the context of the 1999             1. The applicant lodged a complaint against that decision,
promotions procedure, and of the decisions promoting other                seeking classification in grade A 6.
officials in the course of the procedure for that year — the
Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber), composed of: P. Lindh,
President, and R. Garcı́a-Valdecasas and J.D. Cooke, Judges;              The action is directed against the Commission’s decision
H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 15 November 2000, the                rejecting that complaint. The applicant asserts inter alia that:
operative part of which is as follows:
                                                                          —     the Commission’s decision is vitiated by errors in the
1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible.                             investigation of the facts and errors of judgment;
2.    The parties are to bear their own costs.                            —     the Commission wrongly failed to carry out a comprehen-
                                                                                sive assessment of the applicant’s qualifications; and
                                                                          —     the principles of the protection of legitimate expectations
(1) OJ C 247 of 26.8.2000.                                                      and of equal treatment have been violated.