CELEX: 
Language: en
Date: 1977-05-07 00:00:00
Title: Commission Decision of 27 April 1977 fixing the maximum amount of the refund for the eighth partial invitation to tender for white sugar issued under Regulation (EEC) No 2733/76

No L 116 / 20                               Official Journal of the European Communities                           7 . 5 . 77
                                                       COMMISSION DECISION
                                                            of 27 April 1977
                fixing the maximum amount of the refund for the eighth partial invitation to
                            tender for white sugar issued under Regulation ( EEC) No 2733/76
                                             ( Only the Dutch and French texts are authentic)
                                                              (77/337/ EEC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN                                          Whereas the measures provided for in this Decision
COMMUNITIES ,                                                           are in accordance with the opinion of the Manage­
                                                                        ment Committee for Sugar,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European
Economic Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No                            HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :
3330/74 of 19 December 1974 on the common organi­
zation of the market in sugar ('), as last amended by                                         Article 1
Regulation ( EEC) No 31 38 / 76 (2 ), and in particular
Article 1 1 (3) thereof,                                                For the eighth partial invitation to tender issued
Whereas, in accordance with Commission Regulation                       under Regulation ( EEC) No 2733/76, for which the
( EEC) No 2733/76 of 10 November 1976 on a                              period for submission of tenders expired on 27 April
standing invitation to tender for white sugar held by                   1977, the maximum amount of the export refund
the Belgian intervention agency and intended for                        allowed upon the award of tender shall be per 100
export and temporarily suspending the invitation to                     kilograms of white sugar :
tender provided for in Regulation ( EEC) No                             — 18.740 units of account for Lot B 1 ,
2101 /75 (3 ), as amended by Regulation ( EEC) No                       — 18.680 units of account for Lot B 2,
703/77 (4 ), the said agency is to issue partial invita­
tions to tender for the sale of white sugar which it                    — 18.650 units of account for Lot B 3 ,
holds and for determining the export refund on such                     — 18.170 units of account for Lot B 5 .
sugar ;
Whereas , in accordance with Article 9 of Commission                                          Article 2
Regulation ( EEC) No 258 / 72 of 3 February 1972
laying down detailed rules concerning the sale by                       This Decision is addressed to the Kingdom of
tender of sugar by intervention agencies (5 ), where the                Belgium .
terms of the invitation to tender do not specify a
maximum amount for the refund , that amount shall
be fixed in accordance with the procedure laid down                     Done at Brussels, 27 April 1977.
in Article 36 of Regulation ( EEC) No 3330/74, after
examination of the tenders, account being taken of
                                                                                                For the Commission
market conditions and potential outlets ; whereas,
applying these criteria , the maximum amount for the                                             Finn GUNDELACH
eighth partial invitation to tender should be fixed as
provided in Article 1 ;                                                                             Vice-President
 >) 0 [ No L 359 , 31 . 12 . 1974 , p. 1 .
 -) O") No  L  354, 24 .    12 . 1976, p. I.
 ') O'j No  L  310 , 11 .   11 . 1 976 , p. 20 .
 4) OJ  No  L  8 6, 2 . 4 .  1977 , p. v
 s) OJ  No  L  \\. 4 . 2 .   1972, p. 22 .