CELEX: 62014TN0021
Language: en
Date: 2014-01-08 00:00:00
Title: Case T-21/14: Action brought on 8 January 2014 — NetMed v OHIM — Sander chemisch-pharmazeutische Fabrik (SANDTER 1953)

1.3.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 61/19
            
         Action brought on 8 January 2014 — NetMed v OHIM — Sander chemisch-pharmazeutische Fabrik (SANDTER 1953)
   (Case T-21/14)
   2014/C 61/34
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: NetMed Sàrl (Wasserbillig, Luxembourg) (represented by: S. Schafhaus, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sander chemisch-pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH (Baden-Baden, Germany)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 24 October 2013 in Case R 1846/2012-1;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs including those incurred in the appeal and opposition proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: the word mark ‘SANDTER 1953’ for goods in Classes 3, 5 and 10 — Community trade mark application No 9 448 887
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Sander chemisch-pharmazeutische Fabrik GmbH
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German word mark ‘Sander’ for goods in Classes 5, 10 and 25; the international figurative mark with protection in the Benelux countries, Austria and France which includes the word element ‘SANDER’, for goods in Classes 5, 10 and 25
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009