CELEX: 62013CA0090
Language: en
Date: 2014-05-15 00:00:00
Title: Case C-90/13 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2014  — 1. garantovaná a.s. v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Calculation of the amount of the fine — Total turnover in the preceding business year)

7.7.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 212/8
            
         Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 15 May 2014 — 1. garantovaná a.s. v European Commission
   (Case C-90/13 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Competition - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Calculation of the amount of the fine - Total turnover in the preceding business year))
   2014/C 212/08
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: 1. garantovaná a.s. (represented by: K. Lasok QC, J. Holmes and B. Hartnett, Barristers, O. Geiss, Rechtsanwalt)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Vecchi and N. Khan, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 December 2012 in Case T-392/09 1. garantovaná v Commission by which the General Court dismissed an action for partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2009) 5791 final of 22 July 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 of the EC Treaty and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/39.396 — Calcium carbide and magnesium based reagents for the steel industry), concerning a cartel on the markets for calcium carbide powder, calcium carbide granulates and magnesium granulates in a substantial part of the EEA, involving price fixing, market sharing and exchange of information, and, in the alternative, for reduction of the fine imposed on the appellant — Calculation of the fine — Upper limit of 10 % of turnover — Relevant turnover
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the appeal;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders 1. garantovaná a.s. to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.