CELEX: 62014CA0347
Language: en
Date: 2015-10-21 00:00:00
Title: Case C-347/14: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — New Media Online GmbH v Bundeskommunikationssenat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2010/13/EU — Concepts of ‘programme’ and ‘audiovisual media service’ — Determination of the principal purpose of an audiovisual media service — Comparability of the service to television broadcasting — Inclusion of short videos in a section of a newspaper’s website available on the Internet)

14.12.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 414/7
            
         Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 21 October 2015 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgerichtshof — Austria) — New Media Online GmbH v Bundeskommunikationssenat
   (Case C-347/14) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2010/13/EU - Concepts of ‘programme’ and ‘audiovisual media service’ - Determination of the principal purpose of an audiovisual media service - Comparability of the service to television broadcasting - Inclusion of short videos in a section of a newspaper’s website available on the Internet))
   (2015/C 414/10)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Referring court
   
   Verwaltungsgerichtshof
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Appellant: New Media Online GmbH
   
      Respondent: Bundeskommunikationssenat
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The concept of ‘programme’, within the meaning of Article 1(1)(b) of Directive 2010/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 March 2010 on the coordination of certain provisions laid down by law, regulation or administrative action in Member States concerning the provision of audiovisual media services (Audiovisual Media Services Directive), must be interpreted as including, under the subdomain of a website of a newspaper, the provision of videos of short duration consisting of local news bulletins, sports and entertainment clips.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               On a proper interpretation of Article 1(1)(a)(i) of Directive 2010/13, assessment of the principal purpose of a service making videos available offered in the electronic version of a newspaper must focus on whether that service as such has content and form which is independent of that of the journalistic activity of the operator of the website at issue, and is not merely an indissociable complement to that activity, in particular as a result of the links between the audiovisual offer and the offer in text form. That assessment is a matter for the referring court.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 329, 22.9.2014.