CELEX: 62018TN0570
Language: en
Date: 2018-09-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-570/18: Action brought on 25 September 2018 — YQ v Commission

12.11.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 408/60
            
         
      Action brought on 25 September 2018 — YQ v Commission
      (Case T-570/18)
      (2018/C 408/77)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: YQ (represented by: N. de Montigny, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Commission
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  declare and adjudge that the individual decision no longer to grant the applicant the reimbursement of the school fees in connection with her child as of the 2017/2018 school year, processed on 15 November 2017 and reflected for the first time in her pay slip for December 2017, is annulled;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to pay the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 3(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union and of general implementing provisions on the reimbursement of medical fees, in so far as the defendant’s amended interpretation infringed acquired rights, legitimate expectations, legal certainty and the principle of good administration.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the child, the right to family life and the right to education.
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination.
               
            
                  4.
               
               
                  Fourth plea in law, alleging the failure properly to balance the applicant’s interests and to comply with the principle of proportionality, which failures vitiate the contested decision.