CELEX: 62016TA0760
Language: en
Date: 2018-05-17 00:00:00
Title: Case T-760/16: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2018 — Basil v EUIPO — Artex (Baskets adapted for cycles) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing baskets adapted for cycles — Ground for invalidity — Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 52(3) and Article 86(5) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Disclosure of the earlier design — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)

201806220431970542018/C 240/387602016TC24020180709EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180517363611Case T-760/16: Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2018 — Basil v EUIPO — Artex (Baskets adapted for cycles) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing baskets adapted for cycles — Ground for invalidity — Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 52(3) and Article 86(5) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Disclosure of the earlier design — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)
 ---documentbreak--- C2402018EN3610120180517EN0038361361Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2018 — Basil v EUIPO — Artex (Baskets adapted for cycles)
   (Case T-760/16) (
         1
      )
   ‛(Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing baskets adapted for cycles — Ground for invalidity — Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 52(3) and Article 86(5) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Disclosure of the earlier design — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002)’2018/C 240/38Language of the case: German
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Basil BV (Silvolde, Netherlands) (represented by: N. Weber and J. von der Thüsen, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Artex SpA (San Zeno di Cassola, Italy) (represented by: J. Vogtmeier, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 July 2016 (Case R 535/2015-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Artex and Basil.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
            1.
         
         
            The action is dismissed;
         
      
            2.
         
         
            Basil BV is ordered to pay the costs.
         
      (
         1
      )	OJ C 6, 9.1.2018.