CELEX: 62019TN0250
Language: en
Date: 2019-04-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-250/19: Action brought on 15 April 2019 — Tradición CZ v EUIPO — Rivero Argudo (TRADICIÓN CZ, S.L.)

3.6.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 187/88
            
         
      Action brought on 15 April 2019 — Tradición CZ v EUIPO — Rivero Argudo (TRADICIÓN CZ, S.L.)
      (Case T-250/19)
      (2019/C 187/95)
      Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Tradición CZ, SL (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain) (represented by: M. Aznar Alonso, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: María Dolores Rivero Argudo (Jerez de la Frontera, Spain)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
      
         Trade mark at issue: Application for the EU word mark TRADICIÓN CZ, S.L. — Application for registration No 14 977 045
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2019 in Case R 257/2018-2
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  Stay the present proceedings until a final decision is taken in the revocation proceedings against the opposing trade mark No 7272594 RIVERO CZ (proceedings 33785-C) before EUIPO.
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Declare the first plea well founded, annul the contested decision and find that there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  In the alternative and cumulatively, declare the second plea well founded, annul the contested decision and find that there is no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue in respect of the services in Class 35 relating to the sale of vinegars and musts.
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Order EUIPO and the other party, should she appear in the present proceedings, to pay the costs.
               
            
         Plea in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.