CELEX: 62021TN0536
Language: en
Date: 2021-09-01 00:00:00
Title: Case T-536/21: Action brought on 1 September 2021 — Belaeronavigatsia v Council

18.10.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 422/32
            
         
      Action brought on 1 September 2021 — Belaeronavigatsia v Council
      (Case T-536/21)
      (2021/C 422/41)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Belaeronavigatsia (Minsk, Belarus) (represented by: M. Michalauskas, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: Council of the European Union
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/999 of 21 June 2021 implementing Article 8a(1) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2006 concerning restrictive measures in respect of Belarus (OJ L 219 I, 21.6.2021, p. 55);
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2021/1001 of 21 June 2021 amending Decision 2012/642/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in Belarus;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the Council to pay the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging an error of assessment. The applicant alleges, in that regard, that there is no factual justification for the contested acts.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging a failure to comply with the principle of proportionality on the basis that the contested act risks jeopardising the objective of safety in international aviation.