CELEX: 62019CA0184
Language: en
Date: 2020-04-30 00:00:00
Title: Case C-184/19: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Hecta Viticol SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) — Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor, Biroul Vamal de Interior Buzău, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Galaţi (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directives 92/83/EEC and 92/84/EEC — Rates of excise duty on wine and still fermented beverages other than wine and beer — Differentiated rates of excise duty — Principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations)

20.7.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 240/19
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 30 April 2020 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Hecta Viticol SRL v Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) — Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor, Biroul Vamal de Interior Buzău, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Galaţi
      (Case C-184/19) (1)
      
      (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directives 92/83/EEC and 92/84/EEC - Rates of excise duty on wine and still fermented beverages other than wine and beer - Differentiated rates of excise duty - Principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations)
      (2020/C 240/25)
      Language of the case: Romanian
      
         Referring court
      
      Curtea de Apel Bucureşti
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Appellant: Hecta Viticol SRL
      
         Respondents: Agenţia Naţională de Administrare Fiscală (ANAF) — Direcţia Generală de Soluţionare a Contestaţiilor, Biroul Vamal de Interior Buzău, Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanţelor Publice Galaţi
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Articles 7, 11 and 15 of Council Directive 92/83/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the harmonization of the structures of excise duties on alcohol and alcoholic beverages and Article 5 of Council Directive 92/84/EEC of 19 October 1992 on the approximation of the rates of excise duty on alcohol and alcoholic beverages must be interpreted as meaning that they do not require that identical rates of excise duty be fixed on alcoholic beverages in the category ‘wine’, within the meaning of Directive 92/83, and on those in the category ‘fermented beverages other than wine and beer’, within the meaning of that directive.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  The principles of legal certainty and the protection of legitimate expectations must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation amending the rate of excise duty on fermented beverages other than wine and beer without laying down transitional arrangements, where such amendment enters into force eight days after the publication of the act on which it is based and where it does not mean that taxable persons carry out consequential economic adjustments, which it is for the referring court to ascertain.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 187, 3.6.2019.