CELEX: 62017TN0461
Language: en
Date: 2017-07-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-461/17: Action brought on 25 July 2017 — TN v ENISA

16.10.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 347/31
            
         Action brought on 25 July 2017 — TN v ENISA
   (Case T-461/17)
   (2017/C 347/40)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: TN (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul ENISA’s decision of 25 November 2016, withdrawing its offer of employment, according to which the applicant was to be appointed to the position of head of the corporate services and stakeholder relations unit;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul ENISA’s decision of 20 April 2017, rejecting the applicant’s complaint;
            
         
               —
            
            
               award the applicant damages for the material and non-material damage suffered;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order ENISA to bear the entire costs of the proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
   
               1.
            
            
               First plea in law, alleging that the defendant infringed its contractual obligations vis-à-vis the applicant.
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           The applicant alleges that the offer could not be withdrawn as a contract had already been concluded and it contests the defendant’s arguments to the contrary.
                        
                     
         
               2.
            
            
               Second plea in law, alleging undue treatment of the applicant’s personal data and infringement of Article 12 of the Conditions of Employment of other servants of the European Union, of the duty of care, and of the right to good administration.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to be heard.
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           The applicant was not heard before the contested decision to withdraw the offer of employment was taken.