CELEX: 62019TN0826
Language: en
Date: 2019-12-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-826/19: Action brought on 4 December 2019 — Tazzetti v Commission

10.2.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 45/85
            
         
      Action brought on 4 December 2019 — Tazzetti v Commission
      (Case T-826/19)
      (2020/C 45/70)
      Language of the case: Italian
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Tazzetti, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: M. Condinanzi, E. Ferrero and C. Vivani, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  declare the contested decisions void, after finding that they are unlawful and, where appropriate, after disapplying Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/661, in particular Article 7 thereof;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to pay the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      The present action seeks (i) the annulment of Commission Decision (note) ARES (2019) 6048224 of 30 September 2019, addressed to the applicant, of Commission Decision (note) ARES (2019) 6014426 of 27 September 2019, addressed to Tazzetti SpA, Commission Decision (note) ARES (2019) 6024220 of 27 September 2019, addressed to Tazzetti SpA, as well as of subsequent decisions, and, (ii) where necessary, after finding, pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, that Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/661 of 25 April 2019 ensuring the smooth functioning of the electronic registry for quotas for placing hydrofluorocarbons on the market (OJ 2019 L 112, p. 11), in particular Article 7 thereof, is unlawful, a declaration of inapplicability, and as a result, the annulment of the aforementioned decisions implementing that regulation.
      The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-825/19, Tazzetti v Commission.