CELEX: 62013TN0595
Language: en
Date: 2013-11-13 00:00:00
Title: Case T-595/13: Action brought on 13 November 2013 — BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte v OHIM — LG Electronics (compressor technology)

8.2.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 39/21
            
         Action brought on 13 November 2013 — BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte v OHIM — LG Electronics (compressor technology)
   (Case T-595/13)
   2014/C 39/36
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: S. Biagosch, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Korea)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 5 September 2013 (Case R 1176/2012-1);
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: the applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘compressor technology’ for goods in Classes 7, 9 and 11 — Community trade mark application No 7420151
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: LG Electronics, Inc.
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: the word marks ‘KOMPRESSOR PLUS’ and ‘KOMPRESSOR’ for goods in Classes 7 and 11
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: the opposition was upheld in part
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: the appeal was dismissed in part
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009