CELEX: 62011TA0623
Language: en
Date: 2014-04-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-623/11: Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014  — Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community trade mark MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE — Earlier national figurative marks representing a cow, Original Sahne Muh-Muhs HANDGESCHNITTEN HANDGEWICKELT and SAHNE TOFFEE LUXURY CREAM FUDGE — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

10.6.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 175/35
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 9 April 2014 — Pico Food v OHIM — Sobieraj (MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE)
   (Case T-623/11) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community trade mark MILANÓWEK CREAM FUDGE - Earlier national figurative marks representing a cow, Original Sahne Muh-Muhs HANDGESCHNITTEN HANDGEWICKELT and SAHNE TOFFEE LUXURY CREAM FUDGE - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 76(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   2014/C 175/46
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Pico Food GmbH (Tamm, Germany) (represented by: M. Douglas, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: M. Vuijst and P. Geroulakos, acting as Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Bogumił Sobieraj (Milanówek, Poland) (represented by: O. Bischof, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 September 2011 (Case R 553/2010-1), relating to opposition proceedings between PICO Food GmbH and Bogumił Sobieraj.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1)
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2)
            
            
               Orders Pico Food GmbH to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 32, 4. 2. 2012.