CELEX: 62014CN0130
Language: en
Date: 2014-03-20 00:00:00
Title: Case C-130/14: Action brought on 20 March 2014  — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium

26.5.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 159/16
            
         Action brought on 20 March 2014 — European Commission v Kingdom of Belgium
   (Case C-130/14)
   2014/C 159/22
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls, J.-F. Brakeland, acting as Agents)
   
      Defendant: Kingdom of Belgium
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               Declare that, by maintaining rules that deny non-resident taxpayers whose incomes are obtained exclusively or almost exclusively in Belgium (Walloon Region) the benefit of a tax reduction on personal income tax granted to resident taxpayers living in the Walloon Region under the Decree of 3 April 2009 establishing the Caisse d’Investissement de Wallonie and establishing a reduction in personal income tax in the case of subscription of shares or bonds of the Caisse, the Kingdom of Belgium has failed to fulfill its obligations under Article 45 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union and under Article 28 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area,
            
         
               —
            
            
               order Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   By a Decree of the Walloon Region of 3 April 2009, a tax reduction for the subscription of shares or bonds issued by the Caisse d’Investissement de Wallonie is granted only to residents of the Walloon Region. The Commission considers that such a provision constitutes discrimination against non-resident taxpayers whose incomes are obtained exclusively or almost exclusively in Belgium. Consequently, it is incompatible with Article 45 TFEU and Article 28 of the Agreement on the European Economic Area, as interpreted by the Court in Schumacker (1) and Wielockx. (2)
   
   
      (1)  Schumacker, C-279/93, EU:C:1995:31.
   
      (2)  Wielockx, C-80/94, EU:C:1995:271.