CELEX: 62021TN0698
Language: en
Date: 2021-10-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-698/21: Action brought on 27 October 2021 — Paraskevaidis v Council and Commission

3.1.2022   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 2/47
            
         
      Action brought on 27 October 2021 — Paraskevaidis v Council and Commission
      (Case T-698/21)
      (2022/C 2/65)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Georgios Paraskevaidis (Wezembeek-Oppem, Belgium) (represented by: S. Pappas and D.-A. Pappa, lawyers)
      
         Defendants: Council of the European Union and European Commission
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the decision of 4 February 2021 of the Commission and the instalment plan of 9 March 2021 and the decision of the Council of 19 July 2021, by which the complaint of the applicant against the decision of the Commission was rejected, to the extent it contains additional reasoning; and
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendants to bear the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging that the contested decisions infringed the principle of legality. It is also alleged that the Revised Conclusion No 237/05 (1) was not applicable for the period the applicant claimed the educational allowance.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging that the Revised Conclusion No 237/05 was illegally applied retroactively.
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Third plea in law, alleging that the Revised Conclusion No 237/05 was adopted by the Heads of Administration beyond their remit.
               
            
                  4.
               
               
                  Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Revised Conclusion infringes Article 3(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations.
               
            
         (1)  Revised Conclusion No 237/05 on the education allowance within the meaning of Article 3(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations approved by the Heads of Administration at their 284th meeting on 1 July 2020.