CELEX: 62010TA0161
Language: en
Date: 2011-05-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-161/10: Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Tecnifar (E-PLEX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark E-PLEX — Earlier national word mark EPILEX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

9.7.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 204/22
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 24 May 2011 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Tecnifar (E-PLEX)
   (Case T-161/10) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark E-PLEX - Earlier national word mark EPILEX - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2011/C 204/40
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Tecnifar — Industria Tecnica Farmaceutica, SA (Lisbon, Portugal)
   
      Re:
   
   ACTION brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 February 2010 (Case R 662/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Tecnifar — Industria Tecnica Farmaceutica, SA and Longevity Health Products, Inc.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Longevity Health Products, Inc. to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 148, 5.6.2010.