CELEX: 62016CA0630
Language: en
Date: 2017-12-14 00:00:00
Title: Case C-630/16: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 December 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Anstar Oy (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products — Harmonised standard EN 1090-1:2009+A1:2011 — Criteria for determining the scope of a standard adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) in accordance with a mandate of the European Commission — Anchors to be fixed into concrete before it sets and used for fastening facade elements and masonry supports to the building frame)

12.2.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 52/11
            
         Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 14 December 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus — Finland) — Proceedings brought by Anstar Oy
   (Case C-630/16) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Harmonised conditions for the marketing of construction products - Harmonised standard EN 1090-1:2009+A1:2011 - Criteria for determining the scope of a standard adopted by the European Committee for Standardisation (CEN) in accordance with a mandate of the European Commission - Anchors to be fixed into concrete before it sets and used for fastening facade elements and masonry supports to the building frame))
   (2018/C 052/14)
   Language of the case: Finnish
   
      Referring court
   
   Helsingin hallinto-oikeus
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   Anstar Oy
   
      Other party: Turvallisuus- ja kemikaalivirasto (Tukes)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Harmonised standard EN 1090-1:2009+A1:2011, ‘Execution of steel structures and aluminium structures — Part 1: Requirements for conformity assessment of structural components’, must be interpreted as meaning that products, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, intended to be fixed into concrete before it sets fall within its scope if they have a structural function, in the sense that their removal from a structure would immediately reduce its resistance.
   
      (1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.