CELEX: 62004TA0378
Language: en
Date: 2008-02-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-378/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 February 2008 — Orsay v OHIM — Jiménez Arellano (Orsay) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for the word and figurative trade mark Orsay — Earlier national word and figurative trade mark D'ORSAY — Ground for refusal — Risk of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

29.3.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 79/26
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 February 2008 — Orsay v OHIM — Jiménez Arellano (Orsay)
   (Case T-378/04) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for the word and figurative trade mark Orsay - Earlier national word and figurative trade mark D'ORSAY - Ground for refusal - Risk of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2008/C 79/51)
   Language of the case: German
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Orsay GmbH (Willstät, Germany) (represented by: D. von Schultz and S. Elbe, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented initially, by: T. Eichenberg, later by: G. Schneider, Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: José Jiménez Arellano S.A. (Madrid, Spain) (represented initially, by: J. Astiz Suárez, later by: S. Hernán-Carrillo Portolés and finally by: A. Tarí Lázaro, lawyers,
   Re:
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 June 2004 (Case R 909/2002-4) concerning an opposition procedure between José Jiménez Arellano S.A. and Orsay GmbH.
   Operative part of the judgment
   
               1.
            
            
               The application is dismissed;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orsay GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 314 of 18.12.2004.