CELEX: 62017TA0057
Language: en
Date: 2018-07-11 00:00:00
Title: Case T-57/17: Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — Pegasus v Parliament (Institutional law — European Parliament — Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation — Pre-financing set at 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant awarded — Obligation to provide a bank pre-financing guarantee — Financial Regulation — Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation — Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding — Proportionality — Equal treatment)

27.8.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 301/30
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 11 July 2018 — Pegasus v Parliament
      (Case T-57/17) (1)
      
      ((Institutional law - European Parliament - Decision awarding a grant to a political foundation - Pre-financing set at 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant awarded - Obligation to provide a bank pre-financing guarantee - Financial Regulation - Rules of Application of the Financial Regulation - Regulation (EC) No 2004/2003 on the regulations governing political parties at European level and the rules regarding their funding - Proportionality - Equal treatment))
      (2018/C 301/39)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Pegasus (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, C. Burgos and S. Alves, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment in part of Decision FINS-2017-31 of the European Parliament of 12 December 2016 concerning the award of a grant to the applicant, in so far as that decision restricts the pre-financing to 33 % of the maximum amount of the grant and makes its payment subject to the provision of a bank guarantee.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders Pegasus to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.