CELEX: C1997/074/03
Language: en
Date: 1997-03-08 00:00:00
Title: JUDGMENT OF THE COURT of 14 January 1997 in Case C-169/95: Kingdom of Spain v. Commission of the European Communities (State aids - Aid for the construction of a steel foundry in the Province of Teruel, Spain)

No C 74/2            | EN |               Official Journal of the European Communities                                      8 . 3 . 97
     insertion of the sponsor's name or logo at times other               national of Member State B from that latter State to
     than the beginning and/or the end of the programme.                  Serbia or Montenegro on the ground that Member
                                                                          State A allows payment for such exports to be made
                                                                          only if the exports take place from its own territory
(') OJ No C 386, 31 . 12 . 1994, and                                      and they have been authorized by its own competent
    OJ No C 74, 25 . 3 . 1995 .                                           authorities pursuant to Regulation (EEC) No 1432/92,
                                                                          when the goods in question have been classified by the
                                                                          United Nations Sanctions Committee as products
                                                                          intended for strictly medical purposes and the
                                                                          competent authorities of Member State B have issued
                                                                          export authorizations for them in accordance with
                                                                          Regulation (EEC) No 1432/92 .
                JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                     2 . National measures which prove to be contrary to the
                                                                          common commercial policy provided for in Article 113
                       of 14 January 1997                                 of the Treaty and to the Community Regulations
                                                                          implementing that policy are justified under Article 234
in Case C-124/95 (reference for a preliminary ruling from                 of the EEC Treaty only if they are necessary to ensure
the Court of Appeal ): The Queen, ex parte: Centro-Com                    that the Member State concerned performs its
         Sri v. HM Treasury and Bank of England (')                       obligations towards non-member countries under an
                                                                          agreement concluded prior to entry into force of the
(Foreign and security policy — Common commercial                          Treaty or prior to accession by that Member State.
policy — Blocking of funds — Sanctions against the
             Republics of Serbia and Montenegro)                     H OJ No C 174, 8 . 7. 1995 .
                           ( 97/C 74/02 )
                 (Language of the case: English)
                                                                                    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                                           of 14 January 1997
In Case C-124/95 : reference to the Court under Article 177
of the EC Treaty by the Court of Appeal ( England and                in Case C-169/95 : Kingdom of Spain v. Commission of
Wales ) for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending                           the European Communities (')
before that court between the Queen, ex parte: Centro­               (State aids — Aid for the construction of a steel foundry
Com Sri, and HM Treasury and Bank of England on the                                 in the Province of Teruel, Spain)
interpretation of Articles 113 and 234 of the EC Treaty
and Council Regulation (EEC ) No 1432/92 of 1 June                                             ( 97/C 74/03 )
1992 prohibiting trade between the European Economic
Community and the Republics of Serbia and Montenegro
                                                                                     (Language of the case: Spanish)
( OJ No L 151 , 3 . 6 . 1992, p. 4 ), — the Court composed
of G. C. Rodriguez Iglesias, President, G. F. Mancini, J. C.
Moitinho de Almeida and J. L. Murray, Presidents of
                                                                       (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
Chamber, P. J. G. Kapteyn ( Rapporteur ), Advocate­
General; F. G. Jacobs, Registrar: H. A. Riihl, Principal
                                                                               published in the European Court Reports)
Administrar, has given a judgment on 14 January 1997, in
which it rules :                                                     In Case C-169/95 : Kingdom of Spain ( Agents: Alberto
                                                                     Jose Navarro Gonzalez and Gloria Calvo Diaz ) v.
                                                                     Commission of the European Communities ( Agents:
                                                                     Francisco Enrique Gonzalez Diaz and Paul Nemitz ) —
1 . The common commercial policy provided for in                     application for annulment of Commission Decision
     Article 113 of the EEC Treaty, as implemented by                95/438/EC of 14 March 1995 concerning investment aid
     Council Regulation (EEC) No 1432/92 of 1 June 1992              granted by Spain to the company Piezas y Rodajes SA, a
    prohibiting trade between the European Economic                  steel foundry located in Teruel province (Aragon ), Spain
     Community and the Republics of Serbia and                       ( OJ No L 257, 27. 10 . 1995 , p. 45 ), — the Court,
     Montenegro and by Council Regulation (EEC)                      composed of: G. C. Rodriguez Iglesias, President, J. C.
     No 2603/69 of 20 December 1969 establishing                     Moitinho de Almeida, J. L. Murray and L. Sevon,
     common rules for exports, precludes Member State A              Presidents of Chambers, P. J. G. Kapteyn, C. Gulmann,
    from adopting, for the purpose of ensuring effective             D. A. O. Edward, J.-P- Puissochet ( Rapporteur ), G.
     application of United Nations Security Council                  Hirsch, P. Jann and M. Wathelet, Judges; Advocate­
     Resolution 757 (1992) measures prohibiting Serbian              General : G. Tesauro; H. von Holstein, Deputy Registrar,
     or Montenegran funds located in its territory from              for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 January
     being released in order to pay for goods exported by a          1997, in which it:
 ---pagebreak--- 8 . 3 . 97            EN                    Official Journal of the European Communities                                    No C 74/3
1 . dismisses the application;                                              where it is established that the charge has been
                                                                            borne in its entirety by another person and that
                                                                            reimbursement of the trader would constitute unjust
2 . orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.                           enrichment. It is for the national courts to determine,
                                                                            in the light of the facts in each case, whether those
(') OJ No C 208 , 12 . 8 . 1995 .                                           conditions have been satisfied. If the burden of the
                                                                            charge has been passed on only in part, it is for
                                                                            the national authorities to reimburse the trader the
                                                                            amount not passed on.
                                                                       2 . The fact that there is a legal obligation to incorporate
                JUDGMENT OF THE COURT                                       the charge in the cost price does not mean that there is
                        of 14 January 1997                                  a presumption that the entire charge has been passed
                                                                            on, even where failure to comply with that obligation
in Joined Cases C- 192/95 to C-2 18/95 (reference for a                     carries a penalty.
preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d'Instance de Paris ):
Societe Comateb and Others v. Directeur General des
                 Douanes et Droits Indirects (')                       3 . Where, although the charge has been passed on to the
                                                                            purchaser, domestic law permits the trader to claim
(Dock dues — Recovery of sums not due — Obligation to                       that the illegal levying of the charge has caused him
          pass on the charge — Overseas departments)                        damage which excludes, in whole or in part, any
                            ( 97/C 74/04 )                                  unjust enrichment, it is for the national court to give
                                                                            such effect to the claim as may be appropriate.
                 (Language of the case: French)                        (') OJ No C 208 , 12 . 8 . 1995 .
    (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
           published in the European Court Reports)
In Joined Cases C-192/95 to C-218/95 : reference to the
                                                                                      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
Court under Article 177 of the EC Treaty by the Tribunal
d'Instance de Paris, for a preliminary ruling in the                                             ( Sixth Chamber)
proceedings pending before that court between Société                                         of 16 January 1997
 Comateb ( C-192/95 ), Société Panigua ( C-193/95 ), Société
 Édouard et Fils ( C-194/95 ), Société de Distribution de              in Case C-134/95 (reference for a preliminary ruling from
Vins et Liqueurs ( C- 1 95/95 ), Établissements André Haan             the Pretura Circondariale, Biella): Unità Socio-Sanitaria
 ( C-l 96/95 ), Société Diffusion Générale de Quincaillerie            Locale n. 47 di Biella (USSL) v. Istituto Nazionale per
 ( C-197/95 ), Société Diffusion Générale ( C-198/95 ), Société         l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni sul Lavoro (INAIL) (')
 Cama Renault ( C-199/95 ), SCP Ovide et Dorville ( C-200/              (Workers — Labour procurement service — Statutory
 95 ), Société Ducros Guadeloupe ( C-201 /95 ), Société                                              monopoly)
 Comptoir Commercial Caraïbes ( C-202/95 ), Société Giafa
 ( C-203/95 ), Société LVS ( C-204/95 ), Société Catherine et                                        97/C 74/05 )
Jean-Claude Tabar Nouval ( C-205/95 ), Société l'Heure et
 l'Or ( C-206/95 ), Société Général Bazar Bricolage ( C-207/                            (Language of the case: Italian)
 95 ), Société Grain d'Or ( C-208/95 ), Société Cash Service
 ( C-209/95 ), Établissements Efira ( C-210/95 ), Société Fa­
 randole ( C-211/95 ), Société Carat ( C-212/95 ), Société Rio            (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be
  ( C-213/95 ), Société Guadaloupéenne de Distribution Mod­                       published in the European Court Reports)
 erne ( SGDM ) ( C-214/95 ), Martinique Automobiles SA
  (C-215/95 ), Socovi Sari ( C-216/95 ), Établissements Ga­             In Case C- 134/95 : reference to the Court under Article 177
  briel Vangour et Cie Sari ( C-217/95 ), Simat Guadeloupe
                                                                        of the EC Treaty from the Pretura Circondariale (District
  Sari ( C-218/95 ) and Directeur Général des Douanes et
  Droits Indirects — on the interpretation of Community                 Magistrate's Court), Biella ( Italy ), for a preliminary ruling
  law concerning repayment of sums not due, the Court                   in the proceedings pending before that court between
                                                                        Unità Socio-Sanitaria Locale n. 47 di Biella ( USSL ) and
 composed of: G. C. Rodriguez Iglesias, President, G. F.
  Mancini, J. C. Moitinho de Almeida and J. L. Murray,                  Istituto Nazionale per l'Assicurazione contro gli Infortuni
  Presidents of Chamber, P. J. G. Kapteyn, D. A. O. Edward              sul Lavoro ( INAIL ) — on the interpretation of Articles 48 ,
  ( Rapporteur), J. -P. Puissochet, P. Jann and H. Ragnemalm,           49, 54 and 90 of the EC Treaty — the Court ( Sixth
  Judges, Advocate-General : G. Tesauro, Registrar: H. von              Chamber ), composed of: J. L. Murray, President of the
  Holstein, Deputy Registrar, has given a judgment on                   Fourth Chamber, acting for the President of the Sixth
   14 January 1997 in which it rules :                                  Chamber, C. N. Kakouris, P. J. G. Kapteyn ( Rapporteur ),
                                                                        G. Hirsch and H. Ragnemalm, Judges; M. B. Elmer,
                                                                        Advocate-General; L. Hewlett, Administrator, for the
   1 . A Member State may resist repayment to the trader of             Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 January 1997, in
       a charge levied in breach of Community law only                  which it has ruled :