CELEX: 62018CN0255
Language: en
Date: 2018-04-11 00:00:00
Title: Case C-255/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 11 April 2018 — State Street Bank International GmbH v Banca d’Italia

201806290061986612018/C 249/132552018CJC24920180716EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL201804119911Case C-255/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 11 April 2018 — State Street Bank International GmbH v Banca d’Italia
 ---documentbreak--- C2492018EN910120180411EN00139191Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 11 April 2018 — State Street Bank International GmbH v Banca d’Italia
   (Case C-255/18)2018/C 249/13Language of the case: Italian
      Referring court
   
   Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: State Street Bank International GmbH
   
      Defendant: Banca d’Italia
   
      Questions referred
   
   
            1.
         
         
            Should the ‘changes of status’ that do not have an effect on the contribution requirement under Article 12 of Regulation 2015/63 (
                  1
               ) include the merger by acquisition of an institution previously subject to supervision by a national resolution authority with its parent company in another Member State during the contribution period, and does this rule also apply where the merger and the resulting dissolution of the institution took place in 2015, at a time when the Member State had not yet formally established either the national resolution authority or the national resolution fund and the contributions had not yet been calculated?
         
      
            2.
         
         
            Is Article 12 of Regulation 2015/63, in conjunction with Article 14 of that regulation and Articles 103 and 104 of Directive 2014/59, (
                  2
               ) to be interpreted as meaning that also in the case of the merger of an institution by acquisition with a parent company in another Member State during the contribution period, the institution is required to pay the contribution for that period in full, not on a pro rata basis according to the months when the institution was subject to supervision by the resolution authority of the first Member State, by analogy with the rules laid down for ‘newly supervised’ institutions under Article 12(1) of the regulation?
         
      
            3.
         
         
            Are Directive 2014/59, Regulation 2015/63 and the principles governing the system of banking crisis resolution tools to be interpreted as meaning that the rules laid down for the ordinary contribution, in particular Article 12(2) of Regulation 2015/63, also apply, with regard to the timing of the identification of institutions required to contribute and the amount of the contribution, to the extraordinary contribution, bearing in mind the nature of that contribution and the conditions under which it may be imposed?
         
      (
         1
      )	Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/63 of 21 October 2014 supplementing Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to ex ante contributions to resolution financing arrangements (OJ 2015 L 11, p. 44).
   (
         2
      )	Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms and amending Council Directive 82/891/EEC, and Directives 2001/24/EC, 2002/47/EC, 2004/25/EC, 2005/56/EC, 2007/36/EC, 2011/35/EU, 2012/30/EU and 2013/36/EU, and Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 648/2012, of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2014 L 173, p. 190).