CELEX: 62016TN0073
Language: en
Date: 2016-02-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-73/16 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-37/12 De Nicola v EIB

4.4.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 118/38
            
         Appeal brought on 18 February 2016 by Carlo de Nicola against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 18 December 2015 in Case F-37/12 De Nicola v EIB
   (Case T-73/16 P)
   (2016/C 118/44)
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Carlo de Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank
   
      Form of order sought by the appellant
   
   The appellant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Uphold the present appeal and, partially reversing the judgment under appeal, annul point 2 of the operative part, together with paragraphs 59 to 61, 63 to 69 and 71 of the judgment itself;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Consequently, declare that bullying was committed by the EIB against Dr De Nicola, and order the EIB to compensate Dr De Nicola for the damage suffered or, in the alternative, refer the case to another Chamber of the Civil Service Tribunal in order that it may, in a different formation, give a fresh decision on the annulled paragraphs. Subject to completion of the requested medical examination;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the European Investment Bank to pay the costs.
            
         
      Grounds of appeal and main arguments
   
   The present appeal is brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (single Judge) of 18 December 2015 in De Nicola v European Investment Bank (F-37/12).
   The grounds of appeal and main arguments are similar to those relied on in Case T-70/16 P De Nicola v EIB.