CELEX: 62013TN0503
Language: en
Date: 2013-09-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-503/13 P: Appeal brought on 19 September 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 July 2013 in Case F-32/12 Marcuccio v Commission

9.11.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 325/49
            
         Appeal brought on 19 September 2013 by Luigi Marcuccio against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 12 July 2013 in Case F-32/12 Marcuccio v Commission
   (Case T-503/13 P)
   2013/C 325/79
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Luigi Marcuccio (Tricase, Italy) (represented by: G. Cipressa, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission
   
      Form of order sought by the appellant
   
   The appellant claims that the General Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               set aside in its entirety and without exception the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union of 12 July 2013 in Case F-32/12 Marcuccio v Commission;
            
         
               —
            
            
               refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal.
            
         
      Grounds of appeal and main arguments
   
   The appellant relies on two grounds in support of his appeal.
   
               1.
            
            
               First ground of appeal, alleging that Article 14 of the Rules of Procedure of the Civil Service Tribunal is unlawful by reason of tautology and unreasonableness and that there has, in any event, been mistaken, erroneous, misleading and unreasonable interpretation and application of that article, resulting in a serious and manifest infringement of the legally binding principle of natural justice referred to in, inter alia, Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second ground of appeal, alleging a total failure to provide reasons by virtue of, inter alia, a failure to make preliminary inquiries, self-evident, tautologous and arbitrary reasoning, distortion and misrepresentation of the facts, error of law and a manifestly misleading assessment of a procedural fact.