CELEX: C2007/269/76
Language: en
Date: 2007-11-10 00:00:00
Title: Case T-8/95 and T-9/95: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2007 — Pelle and Konrad v Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities (Non-contractual liability — Milk — Additional levy — Reference quantity — Regulation (EEC) No 2187/93 — Compensation of producers — Suspension of limitation)

10.11.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 269/42
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 27 September 2007 — Pelle and Konrad v Council of the European Union and the Commission of the European Communities
   (Case T-8/95 and T-9/95) (1)
   
   (Non-contractual liability - Milk - Additional levy - Reference quantity - Regulation (EEC) No 2187/93 - Compensation of producers - Suspension of limitation)
   (2007/C 269/76)
   Language of the case: German
   Parties
   
      Applicants: Wilhelm Pelle (Kluse-Ahlen, Germany) and Ernst-Reinhard Konrad (Löllbach, Germany) (represented by: B. Meisterernst, M. Düsing, D. Manstetten, F. Schulze and W. Haneklaus, lawyers)
   
      Defendants: Council of the European Union (represented initially by A. Brautigam and A.-M. Colaert, and subsequently by A.-M.Colaert, agents) and the Commission of the European Communities (represented by B. Booß and M. Niejahr, agents, and subsequently by T. van Rijn and M. Niejahr, assisted initially by H.-J. Rabe, G. Berrisch and M. Núñez-Müller, lawyers)
   Re:
   Applications for compensation under Article 178 of the EC Treaty (now Article 235 EC) and under the second paragraph of Article 215 of the EC Treaty (now the second paragraph of Article 288 EC) for damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Council Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector (OJ 1984 L 90, p. 13), as supplemented by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1371/84 of 16 May 1984 laying down detailed rules for the application of the additional levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation No 804/68 (OJ 1984 L 132, p. 11).
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Orders the Council and the Commission to make good the damage suffered by Wilhelm Pelle and Ernst-Reinhard Konrad as a result of the application of Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector, as supplemented by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1371/84 of 16 May 1984 laying down detailed rules for the application of the additional levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68, in so far as those regulations did not provide for the allocation of a reference quantity to producers who, pursuant to an undertaking given under Council Regulation (EEC) No 1078/77 of 17 May 1977, introducing a system of premiums for the non-marketing of milk and milk products and for the conversion of dairy herds, did not deliver any milk during the reference year adopted by the Member State concerned;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders that Wilhelm Pelle, applicant in Case T-8/95, be compensated for losses suffered as a result of the application of Regulation No 857/84 for the period commencing 5 December 1987 and ending 28 March 1989;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders that Ernst-Reinhard Konrad, applicant in Case T-9/95, be compensated for losses suffered as a result of the application of Regulation No 857/84 for the period commencing 27 November 1986 and ending on 28 March 1989;
            
         
               4.
            
            
               Requests the parties to inform the Court within six months from the date of delivery of this judgment of the amounts of damages agreed to be payable;
            
         
               5.
            
            
               Orders that, in the absence of agreement, the parties shall transmit to the Court within the same period a statement of their views with supporting figures;
            
         
               6.
            
            
               Reserves the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 132, 28.5.2005.