CELEX: C2006/281/62
Language: en
Date: 2006-11-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-148/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 September 2006 — Comunidad autónoma de Madrid and Mintra v Commission (Provision of data relating to the excessive deficit procedure — Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 — European system of accounts 1995 (ESA 95) — Regulation (EC) No 2223/96 — Letter of the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat) — Action for annulment — Act against which proceedings can be brought — Inadmissibility)

18.11.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 281/36
            
         Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 September 2006 — Comunidad autónoma de Madrid and Mintra v Commission
   (Case T-148/05) (1)
   
   (Provision of data relating to the excessive deficit procedure - Regulation (EC) No 3605/93 - European system of accounts 1995 (ESA 95) - Regulation (EC) No 2223/96 - Letter of the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat) - Action for annulment - Act against which proceedings can be brought - Inadmissibility)
   (2006/C 281/62)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   Parties
   
      Applicants: Comunidad autónoma de Madrid and Madrid, infraestructuras del transporte (Mintra) (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: C. Fernandez Vicién, D. Ortega Peciña and J. Sabater Marotias, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Diaz-Llanos La Roche and L. Escobar Guerrero, Agents)
   Re:
   Application for annulment of the decision of the Commission contained in a letter of the Statistical Office of the European Communities (Eurostat) of 3 February 2005 concerning the classification of Madrid, infraestructuras del transporte (Mintra) in the sector ‘public administrations’ within the European system of accounts 1995 (ESA 1995).
   Operative part of the order
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as inadmissible;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The applicants shall pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 143 of 11.6.2005.