CELEX: 62016TA0806
Language: en
Date: 2018-03-22 00:00:00
Title: Case T-806/16: Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2018 — Agricola J.M. v EUIPO — Miguel Torres (CLOS DE LA TORRE) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark CLOS DE LA TORRE — Earlier national word mark TORRES — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Likelihood of confusion)

14.5.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 166/28
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2018 — Agricola J.M. v EUIPO — Miguel Torres (CLOS DE LA TORRE)
   (Case T-806/16) (1)
   
   ((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark CLOS DE LA TORRE - Earlier national word mark TORRES - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Likelihood of confusion))
   (2018/C 166/36)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Agricola J.M., SL (Girona, Spain) (represented by: J. Clos Creus, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Miguel Torres, SA (Vilafranca del Penedès, Spain) (represented by: J. Güell Serra, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 July 2016 (Case R 2099//2015-5) concerning opposition proceedings between Miguel Torres and Agricola J.M.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Agricola J.M., SL to bear the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.