CELEX: 62020TN0632
Language: en
Date: 2020-10-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-632/20: Action brought on 15 October 2020 — OG v EDA

18.1.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 19/56
            
         
      Action brought on 15 October 2020 — OG v EDA
      (Case T-632/20)
      (2021/C 19/60)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: OG (represented by: S. Pappas and N. Kyriazopoulou, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Defence Agency (EDA)
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the decision of the European Defence Agency of 13 December 2019, by which the applicant had not been placed on the reserve list of suitable candidates;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul the decision of the Chief Executive of EDA by which the complaint of the applicant against the EDA decision of 13 December 2019 was rejected, to the extent it offers an additional reasoning; and
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order compensation in the amount of EUR 3 000 (three thousand euros) for the non-material damage suffered by the applicant;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to bear its costs as well as the applicant’s costs for the current proceedings.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging infringement of the essential procedural requirement to state reasons.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the principles of equal treatment, transparency, objectivity and sound administration.
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the vacancy notice, illegal or insufficient reasoning and manifest error of assessment vitiating the assessment of the qualifications of the applicant in respect of the post to be filled.