CELEX: 62016TN0305
Language: en
Date: 2016-06-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-305/16: Action brought on 14 June 2016 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Primark Holdings (LOVE TO LOUNGE)

8.8.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 287/26
            
         Action brought on 14 June 2016 — Lidl Stiftung v EUIPO — Primark Holdings (LOVE TO LOUNGE)
   (Case T-305/16)
   (2016/C 287/32)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Kefferpütz and A. Berger, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Primark Holdings (Dublin, Ireland)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘LOVE TO LOUNGE’ — EU trade mark No 8 500 548
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 March 2016 in Case R 489/2015-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision and declare invalid EU trade mark No 8 500 548;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the intervener to pay the costs of the proceedings before the EUIPO.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.