CELEX: 62007TA0472
Language: en
Date: 2010-02-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-472/07: Judgment of the Court of 3 February 2010 — Enercon v OHIM — Hasbro (ENERCON) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark ENERCON — Earlier Community word mark TRANSFORMERS ENERGON — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

27.3.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 80/24
            
         Judgment of the Court of 3 February 2010 — Enercon v OHIM — Hasbro (ENERCON)
   (Case T-472/07) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark ENERCON - Earlier Community word mark TRANSFORMERS ENERGON - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   2010/C 80/41
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Enercon GmbH (Aurich, Germany) (represented by: R. Böhm and V. Henke, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court: Hasbro Inc. (Pawtucket, Rhode Island, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 25 October 2007 (Case R 959/2006-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Hasbro, Inc. and Enercon GmbH
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Enercon GmbH to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 79, 29.3.2008.