CELEX: 62013TN0128
Language: en
Date: 2013-03-01 00:00:00
Title: Case T-128/13: Action brought on 1 March 2013 — Vicente Gandia Pla/OHIM — Tesco Stores (MARQUES DE CHIVÉ)

27.4.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 123/21
            
         Action brought on 1 March 2013 — Vicente Gandia Pla/OHIM — Tesco Stores (MARQUES DE CHIVÉ)
   (Case T-128/13)
   2013/C 123/35
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Vicente Gandia Pla, SA (Chiva, Spain) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tesco Stores Ltd (Cheshunt, United Kingdom)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims/claim that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Declare admissible the here concerned appeal and enclosures;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Annul the Boards of Appeal Decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Condemn the OHIM and the intervener to bear the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘MARQUES DE CHIVÉ’ for goods in classes 29, 32 and 33 — Community trade mark registration No 9 571 415
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: United Kingdom registration No 1 520 720 of the word mark ‘MARQUES DE CHIVE’ for goods in class 33
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition directed at the application for the goods in class 33 for lack of genuine use
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulled the contested decision and rejected the application for the goods in class 33
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 42(2) and (3) of Council Regulation No 207/2009.