CELEX: 62015TN0638
Language: en
Date: 2015-11-12 00:00:00
Title: Case T-638/15: Action brought on 12 November 2015 — Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) v OHIM — Lion Laboratories (ALCOLOCK)

18.1.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 16/50
            
         Action brought on 12 November 2015 — Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) v OHIM — Lion Laboratories (ALCOLOCK)
   (Case T-638/15)
   (2016/C 016/60)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International) Inc. (Toronto, Canada) (represented by: E. Baud, P. Marchiset, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lion Laboratories Ltd (Barry, United Kingdom)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ALCOLOCK’ — Community trade mark No 8 443 301
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Invalidity proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 August 2015 in Case R 1323/2014-1
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               declare valid the CTM Trademark owned and registered in the name of Alcohol Countermeasure Systems (International), Inc.;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Articles 8(2) and 15(2) of Regulation No 207/2009, Article 10(2) of Directive No 2008/95 and Article 19(2) of TRIPS, lack of motivation and misrepresentation of the facts;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Articles 57(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009 and insufficient motivation;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 and of Article 296 TFEU and violation of the definition of genuine use pursuant to Regulation No. 207/2009.