CELEX: 62015CN0454
Language: en
Date: 2015-08-24 00:00:00
Title: Case C-454/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 24 August 2015 — Jürgen Webb-Sämann v Christopher Seagon (acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Baumarkt Praktiker DIY GmbH)

23.11.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 389/16
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 24 August 2015 — Jürgen Webb-Sämann v Christopher Seagon (acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Baumarkt Praktiker DIY GmbH)
   (Case C-454/15)
   (2015/C 389/17)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Referring court
   
   Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Jürgen Webb-Sämann
   
      Defendant: Christopher Seagon (acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Baumarkt Praktiker DIY GmbH)
   
      Question referred
   
   Is a national understanding of a rule under which outstanding salary claims which were deposited with the employer in order to be paid over to a pension fund by a particular date but which were not paid by that employer into a separate account and therefore did not come within the scope of a right to have those claims excluded from insolvency proceedings in respect of the employer’s assets (Aussonderungsrecht) pursuant to Paragraph 47 of the German Insolvency Regulation contrary to Article 8 of Directive 2008/94/EC (1) or to other EU law?
   
      (1)  Directive 2008/94/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2008 on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer (OJ 2008 L 283, p. 36).