CELEX: 52011PC0482
Language: en
Date: 2011-08-01
Title: Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 as regards certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Members States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability

|
			
		
		
		52011PC0482
		
			Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 as regards certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Members States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability /* COM/2011/0482 final - 2011/0211 (COD) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           background
to the proposal
·      Reasons and objectives for the proposal
The sustained financial and economic crisis is
increasing the pressure on national financial resources as Member States are
reducing their budgets. In this context ensuring a smooth implementation of
cohesion policy programmes is of particular importance as a tool for injecting
funds into the economy. 
Nonetheless, the implementation of the
programmes is often challenging as a result of the liquidity problems resulting
from budget constraints. This is particularly the case for those Member States
which have been most affected by the crisis and have received financial assistance
under a programme from the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM)
for the EURO countries or from the Balance of Payments (BoP) mechanism for non
EURO countries. To date, six countries - including Greece which has received
financial assistance outside the EFSM - have requested financial assistance
under these mechanisms and have agreed with the Commission a macro-economic
adjustment programme. These countries are Hungary, Romania, Latvia, Portugal,
Greece and Ireland, hereafter called "programme countries". It should
be noted that Hungary which has entrered the BoP mechanism in 2008 has already
exited in 2010.
In order to ensure that these Member States (or
any other Member State which maybe concerned by such assistance programmes in
the future) continue the implementation of the Structural Fund and Cohesion Fund
programmes on the ground and disburse funds to projects, the current proposal
contains provisions that would allow the Commission to make increased payments
to these countries, for the period they are under the support mechanisms,
without modifying their overall allocation under cohesion policy for the period
2007-2013. This will provide additional financial resources to the Member
States at a critical juncture and will facilitate the continuation of the
implementation of the programmes on the ground.
·     
General context
The deepening of the financial crisis in some
of the Member States is undoubtedly affecting substantially the real economy
due to the amount of debt and the difficulties encountered by the Governments to
borrow money from the market.
The Commission has put forward proposals in
response to the current financial crisis and to its socio-economic
consequences. In the framework of its recovery package, the Commission proposed
in December 2008 a number of regulatory changes aiming to simplify the
implementation rules for Cohesion Policy and to provide additional pre-financing
through advance payments to ERDF and ESF programmes. The additional advance
payments paid out to the Member States in 2009 have provided an immediate cash
injection of EUR 6.25 billion, within the financial envelope agreed for each
Member State for the 2007-2013 period. This amendment brought the total of
advance payments to EUR 11.25 billion. A proposal presented by the Commission
in July 2009, provided for additional measures of simplification of the
implementation of the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund. The adoption of
these measures in June 2010 has contributed significantly towards the simplification
of the implementation of the programmes and boosted the absorption of the
funds, while reducing administrative burdens on beneficiaries.
·     
Provisions in force in the policy sphere of
the proposal
Article 77 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006
(hereinafter the 'General Regulation') provides that the interim paymensts and
the final balance shall be calculated by applying the co-financing rate for
each priority axis laid down by the Commission decision adopting the
operational programme concerned. 
·     
Consistency with other policies and
objectives of the Union
The proposal is consistent with other proposals
and intitiatives adopted by the European Commission as a response to the
financial crisis .
2.           CONSULTATION OF INTEREST PARTIES AND
IMPACT ANALYSIS
·     
Consultation of interested parties
There was no consultation of external
stakeholders
·     
Procurement and use of expertise
Use of external expertise has not been
necessary.
·     
Impact analysis
The proposal would allow the Commission to increase
payments to the countries concerned, for the period they are under the support
mechanisms. The increase will be an amount calculated by applying ten
percentage points top-up to the co-financing rates applicable to the priority
axis of the programmes to the newly certified expenditure submitted during the
period in question. 
This will not impose additional financial
requirements to the overall budget since the total financial allocation for the
period from the Funds to the countries and the programmes in question will not
change.
3.           Legal elements of the proposal
·     
Summary of the proposed measures
It is proposed to modify article 77 of the
General Regulation in order to allow the Commission, upon request of the Member
States concerned, to reimburse the newly declared expenditure for the period in
question by an increased amount calculated by applying a 10 percentage points
top-up of the applicable co-financing rates for the priority axis.
In applying the top-up, the co-financing rate
of the programme cannot exceed by more than 10 percentage points the maximum
ceilings of Annex III to the General Regulation. In any case contribution from
the funds to the priority axis concerned cannot be higher than the amount
mentioned in the Commission decision approving the operational programme.
Following the adoption of a Council decision
granting assistance to a Member State under the support mechanisms, the
Commission upon request of the Member States concerned will be applying the
above mentioned calculation for all the newly declared expenditure under an
operational programme for the Member State concerned. 
This will be a temporary measure which will be
terminated once the Member State exits the support mechanism.
·     
Legal basis
Council Regulation (CE) No 1083/2006 of 11 July
2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund,
the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No
1260/1999 defines the common rules applicable to the three Funds. Based on the
principle of shared management between the Commission and the Member States,
this Regulation includes provisions for the programming process as well as
arrangements for programme (including financial) management, monitoring,
financial control and evaluation of projects.
·     
Subsidiarity principle
The proposal complies within the subsidiarity
principle to the extent that it seeks to provide increased support through
Structural Funds and Cohesion Fund for certain Member States which experience
serious difficulties, notably with problems in their economic growth and
financial stability and with a deterioration in their deficit and debt
position, also due to the international economic and financial environment. In
this context, it is necessary to establish at the European Union level a
temporary mechanism which allows the European Commission to increase the reimbursement
on the basis of the certified expenditure under Structural Funds and the
Cohesion Fund. 
·     
Proportionality principle
The proposal conforms to the proportionality
principle:
The current proposal is indeed proportionate
since it provides increased support from the Structural Funds and the Cohesion
Fund to the Member States in difficulties or threatened with severe
difficulties caused by exceptional occurrences going beyond their control and
falling under the conditions of Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010
(establishing the European financial stabilization mechanism), or in
difficulties or seriously threatened with difficulties as regards its balance
of payments and falling under the conditions of Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002,
as well as to Greece, which received financial assistance ouside the EFSM under
the Inter-creditor Agreement and the Euro Area Loan Facility Act. 
·     
Choice of instruments
Proposed instrument: regulation.
Other instruments would not be appropriate for
the following reasons:
The Commission has explored the scope for
manoeuvre provided by the legal framework and considers necessary, in the light
of the experience up to now, to propose modifications to the General
Regulation. The objective of this revision is to further facilitate the
co-financing of projects thereby accelerating both their implementation and the
impact of such investments on the real economy.
4.           Budgetary impact
There is no impact on commitment appropriations
since no modification is proposed to the maximum amounts of Structural Funds and
Cohesion Fund financing provided for in the operational programmes for the
programming period 2007-2013.
For payment appropriations, the proposal can
result in a higher reimburserment to the Member States concerned. The
additional payment appropriations for this proposal will imply an increase of
payment appropriations (for 2012 approximatly EUR 2,304 million) which may be
compensated by the end of the programming period. Therefore, the total payment
appropriations for the whole programming period remains unchanged.
In the light of Member State's request to
benefit from the action and taking into account the evolution in regard to the
submission of interim payments, the Commission will in 2012 review the need for
additional payment credits and if necessary propose the necessary actions to
the Budgetary Authority.
The proposal shows the willingness on the part
of the Commission to assist the efforts of the Member States to deal with the
financial crisis. The amendment will provide the Member States concerned with
the funds necessary to support projects and the recovery of the economy.
2011/0211 (COD)
Proposal for a
REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL
amending Council Regulation (EC) No
1083/2006 as regards certain provisions relating to financial management for
certain Members States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties
with respect to their financial stability
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 177 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the European
Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative
act to the national Parliaments,
Having regard to the opinion of the
European Economic and Social Committee[1],
Having regard to the opinion of the
Committee of the Regions[2],
Acting in accordance with the ordinary
legislative procedure
Whereas:
(1)              
The unprecedented global financial crisis and
economic downturn have seriously damaged economic growth and financial stability
and provoked a strong deterioration in financial and economic conditions in
several Member States. In particular, certain Member States experience serious
difficulties or are threatened with such difficulties, notably with problems in
their economic growth and financial stability and with a deterioration in their
deficit and debt position, also due to the international economic and financial
environment.
(2)              
Whilst important actions to counterbalance the
negative effects of the crisis have already been taken, including amendments of
the legislative framework, the impact of the financial crisis on the real
economy, the labour market and citizens is being widely felt. Pressure on
national financial resources is increasing and further steps should be taken to
alleviate that pressure through the maximum and optimal use of the funding from
the Structural Funds and the Cohesion Fund. 
(3)              
Based on Article 122(2) of the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union (TFEU) providing the possibility of granting
Union financial assistance to a Member State in difficulties or seriously
threatened with severe difficulties caused by exceptional occurrences beyond
its control, Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010 of 11 May 2010 establishing a
European financial stabilisation mechanism[3]
has established such a mechanism with a view to preserving the financial
stability of the Union.
(4)              
By Council Implementing Decisions 2011/77/EU of
7 December 2010[4]
and 2011/344/EU of 30 May 2011[5]
Ireland and Portugal were granted such financial assistance. 
(5)              
Greece was experiencing serious difficulties
with respect to its financial stability already before the entry into force of
Regulation (EU) No 407/2010. Therefore financial assistance to Greece could not
be based on that Regulation.
(6)              
The Intercreditor Agreement and the Loan Facility Agreement concluded for Greece on 8 May 2011 entered into force on 11 May 2010. It foresees that the Intercreditor
Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for a three-year programme
period as long as there are any amounts outstanding under the Loan Facility
Agreement.
(7)              
Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002 of 18
February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term financial
assistance for Member States' balances of payments[6] has established an instrument providing
that the Council will grant mutual assistance where a Member State which has
not adopted the euro is in difficulties or is seriously threatened with
difficulties as regards its balance of payments.
(8)              
By Council Decisions 2009/102/EC of 4 November 2008[7], 2009/290/EC of 20 January 2009[8] and 2009/459/EC of 26 June 2009[9] Hungary, Latvia and Romania were
granted such financial assistance. 
(9)              
The period during which the assistance is
available to Ireland, Hungary, Latvia, Portugal and Romania is set out in the
respective Council Decisions. The period during which assistance was available to
Hungary expired on 4 November 2010.
(10)          
The period during which the assistance under the
Inter-creditor Agreement together with the Euro Area Loan Facility Act is available to Greece is different
as far as each Member State participating in these instruments is concerned.
Fur the purposes of this Regulation a single starting date for the application
of this Regulation should therefore be fixed by this Regulation.
(11)          
On 11 July 2011, finance ministers of the 17
euro-area Member States signed the Treaty establishing the European Stability
Mechanism (ESM). The Treaty follows the European Council decision of 25 March
2011. It is foreseen that by 2013, the ESM will assume the tasks currently
fulfilled by the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) and the European
Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM). This future mechanism should
therefore already be taken into account by this Regulation.
(12)          
The European Council conclusions of 23 and 24 June
2011 welcome the Commission's intention to enhance the synergies between the
loan programme for Greece and the Union funds, supporting efforts to increase
Greece's capacity to absorb Union funds in order to stimulate growth and
employment by refocusing on improving competitiveness and employment creation.
Moreover, the conclusions welcome and support the preparation by the
Commission, together with the Member States, of a comprehensive programme of
technical assistance to Greece. This Regulation contributes to these synergy
efforts.
(13)          
In order to facilitate the management of Union
funding, to help accelerate investments in Member States and regions and to improve
the availability of funding to the economy it is necessary to allow the
increase of interim payments from the Structural Funds as well as from the
Cohesion Fund by an amount corresponding to ten percentage points above the
actual co-financing rate for each priority axis for Member States which are
facing serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability and have
requested to benefit from this measure.
(14)          
The rules on calculation of interim payments and
the payment of the final balance for operational programmes during the period
in which the Member States receive the financial assistance for addressing
serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability should be
revised accordingly. 
(15)          
After the end of the period during which
financial assistance has been made available, evaluations carried out in
accordance with Article 48(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11
July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development
Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation
(EC) No 1260/1999[10]
might need to inter alia assess whether the reduction of the national
co-funding does not lead to a significant departure from the goals initially
set. Such evaluation might lead to the revision of the operational programme.
(16)          
Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 should therefore be
amended accordingly.
(17)          
As the unprecedented crisis affecting
international financial markets and the economic downturn which have seriously
damaged the financial stability of several Member States necessitates a rapid
response in order to counter the effects on the economy as a whole, this
Regulation should enter into force as soon as possible and apply retroactively
for the periods during which the Member States received financial assistance from
the Union or from other euro-area Member States in order to address serious
difficulties with respect to their financial stability,
HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
Article 77 of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006
is replaced by the the following:
“Article 77
Common
rules for calculating interim payments and payments of the final balance
1.           Interim payments and
payments of the final balance shall be calculated by applying the co-financing
rate laid down in the decision on the operational programme concerned for each
priority axis to the eligible expenditure indicated under that priority axis in
each statement of expenditure certified by the certifying authority.
2.           By way of derogation from Article
53 (2) and the second sentence of Article 53(4) and from the ceilings set out in
Annex III, on the request of a Member State, interim payments and payments of
the final balance may be increased by an amount corresponding to ten percentage
points above the co-financing rate applicable to each priority axis, but not
exceeding one hundred percent, to be applied to the amount of eligible expenditure
newly declared in each certified statement of expenditure submitted during the
period in which a Member State meets one of the following conditions:
(a)         
financial assistance is made available to it under
Council Regulation (EC) No 407/2010 establishing a
European financial stabilisation mechanism* or, financial assistance is made
available by other euro-area Member States before the entry into force of that
Regulation;
(b)         
medium-term financial assistance is made available
to it in accordance with Council
Regulation (EC) No 332/2002**;
(c)         
financial assistance is made available to it in
accordance with the Treaty establishing the European Stability Mechanism signed
on 11 July 2011.
3            For the purpose of
calculating interim payments and the payment of the final balance after the
Member State ceases to benefit from the financial assistance referred to in
paragraph 2, the Commission shall not take into account the increased amounts
paid in accordance with that paragraph.
However, these amounts shall be taken into account
for the purpose of Article 79(1).
4.           Notwithstanding paragraph
2, the Union contribution through interim payments and payments of the final
balance shall not be higher than the public contribution and the maximum amount
of assistance from the Funds for each priority axis as laid down in the
decision of the Commission approving the operational programme.
5.           Paragraphs
2 and 3 shall not apply to operational programmes under the European
territorial cooperation objective.
*        OJ L 118, 12.5.2010, p.1.
**      OJ L 53,
23.2.2002, p. 1.”
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on the
day of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union. 
However, it shall apply retroactively to
the following Member States with effect from the day financial assistance was
made available to them: 
(a) Ireland from 10 December 2010;
(b) Greece from 11 May 2010;
(c) Latvia from 23 January 2009;
(d) Hungary from 05 November 2008;
(e) Portugal from 24 May 2011;
(f) Romania from 11 May 2009.
This Regulation shall be binding in its
entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels,
For the European Parliament                       For
the Council
The President                                                 The
President
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
1.           NAME OF THE PROPOSAL:
Proposal for a Regulation of the European
Parliament and of the Council amending Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 as
regards certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Members
States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to
their financial stability.
2.           ABM / ABB FRAMEWORK
Policy Area(s) concerned and associated
Activity/Activities:
Regional Policy; ABB activity 13.03
Employment and Social Affairs; ABB activity
04.02
Cohesion Fund, ABB 13.04
3.           BUDGET LINES
3.1.        Budget lines (operational
lines and related technical and administrative assistance lines (ex- B.A
lines)):
The proposed new action will be implemented
on the following budget lines:
·      13.031600 Convergence (ERDF)
·      13.031800 Regional competitiveness & employment (ERDF)
·      04.0217 Convergence (ESF)
·      04.0219 Regional competitiveness & employment (ESF)
·      13.04.02 Cohesion Fund
3.2.        Duration of the action and
of the financial impact:
3.3.      Budgetary
characteristics:
 Budget line || Type of expenditure || New || EFTA contribution || Contributions from applicant countries || Heading in financial perspective 
 13.031600 || Non-comp || Diff || NO || NO || NO || No 1b 
 13.031800 || Non-comp || Diff || NO || NO || NO || No 1b 
 04.0217 || Non-comp || Diff || NO || NO || NO || No 1b 
 13.04.02 || Non-comp || Diff || NO || NO || NO || No 1b 
 04.0219 || Non-comp || Diff || NO || NO || NO || No 1b 
4.           SUMMARY OF RESOURCES
4.1.        Financial Resources
4.1.1.     Summary of commitment
appropriations (CA) and payment appropriations (PA) 
The following tables show the estimated
impact of the proposed measures in 2011 to 2013. Since no new financial
resources are proposed for commitment appropriations, no figures are inserted
in the tables but n.a. (non-applicable) is indicated. The proposal is therefore
in line with the multi-annual financial framework for 2007-2013. 
For payments, the proposal can result in a
higher reimbursment to the Member States concerned. 
For payments, the proposal can result in a
higher reimbursment to the Member States concerned. Based on the payment
forecast from Member States revised by the Commission and the payment
appropriations included in the 2012 Draft Budget, the budgetary needs would be
approximatly EUR 2,304 million.[11]
The additional payment appropriations for this proposal will imply an increase
of payment appropriations in 2012 which may be compensated by the end of the
programming period. Therefore, the total payment appropriations for the whole
programming period remains unchanged.
In the light of Member State's request to
benefit from the action and taking into account the evolution in regard to the
submission of interim payments, the Commission will in 2012 review the need for
additional payment credits and if necessary propose the necessary actions to
the Budgetary Authority.
No estimate has been calculated for the
year 2013 and any consequences would be taken into account in the 2013 budget
procedure. 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
   Expenditure type || Section no. ||   ||   Year n ||   n + 1 ||   n + 2 ||   n + 3 ||   n + 4 || n + 5 and later ||   Total 
 Operational expenditure[12] ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Commitment Appropriations (CA) || 8.1 || a || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 Payment Appropriations (PA) ||   || b || n.a || +2,304 || n.a ||  n.a. || -2,304 || n.a || 0. 
 Administrative expenditure within reference amount[13] ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Technical & administrative assistance (NDA) || 8.2.4 || c || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 TOTAL REFERENCE AMOUNT ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Commitment Appropriations ||   || a+c || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 Payment Appropriations ||   || b+c || n.a. || n.a. || n.a || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || 0,000   
 Administrative expenditure not included in reference amount[14] ||   ||   
 Human resources and associated expenditure (NDA) || 8.2.5 || d || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 Administrative costs, other than human resources and associated costs, not included in reference amount (NDA) || 8.2.6 || e || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
Total indicative financial cost of
intervention 
 TOTAL CA including cost of Human Resources ||   || a+c+d+e || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 TOTAL PA including cost of Human Resources ||   || b+c+d+e || n.a || n.a. || n.a || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a 
Co-financing details
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Co-financing body ||   ||   Year n ||   n + 1 ||   n + 2 ||   n + 3 ||   n + 4 || n + 5 and later ||   Total 
 …………………… || f || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 TOTAL CA including co-financing || a+c+d+e+f || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
4.1.2.     Compatibility
with Financial Programming
x     Proposal is compatible with existing financial programming.
¨      Proposal will entail reprogramming of the relevant heading in
the financial perspective.
¨      Proposal may require application of
the provisions of the Interinstitutional Agreement[15] (i.e. flexibility instrument
or revision of the financial perspective).
4.1.3.     Financial impact on Revenue
x      Proposal has no financial implications on revenue
¨      Proposal has financial impact – the effect on revenue is as
follows:
EUR million
(to one decimal place)
   ||   || Prior to action [Year n-1] ||   || Situation following action 
 Budget line || Revenue ||   || [Year n] || [n+1] || [n+2] || [n+3] || [n+4] || [n+5][16] 
   || a) Revenue in absolute terms ||   ||   || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 b) Change in revenue ||  D ||   || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
(Please specify each revenue budget line
involved, adding the appropriate number of rows to the table if there is an
effect on more than one budget line.)
4.2.        Human
Resources FTE (including officials, temporary and external staff) – see detail
under point 8.2.1.
   Annual requirements ||   Year n ||   n + 1 ||   n + 2 ||   n + 3 ||   n + 4 ||   n + 5 and later 
 Total number of human resources || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
5.           CHARACTERISTICS AND OBJECTIVES
5.1.        Need to be met in the
short or long term
The sustained financial
and economic crisis is increasing the pressure on national financial resources,
as Member States are reducing their budgets. In this context ensuring a smooth
implementation of cohesion policy programmes is of particular importance as a
tool for injecting funds into the economy. In order to
ensure that these Member States continue the implementation of the Structural
Fund and Cohesion Fund programmes on the ground and disburse funds to projects,
the proposal contains provisions that would allow the Commission to increase
payments to Member States, for the period they are under the support mechanisms. 
5.2.        Value-added of Community
involvement and coherence of the proposal with other financial instruments and
possible synergy
The proposal
will allow the continuation of the implementation of the programmes, injecting
money into the economy while at the same time help reduce the burden on public
expenditure.
5.3.        Objectives, expected
results and related indicators of the proposal in the context of the ABM
framework
The objective is to help those Memebr
States mostly affected by the financial crisis to be able to continue with the
implementation of the programmes on the ground, hence injecting funds into the
economy.
5.4.        Method of Implementation
(indicative)
Show below the method(s) chosen for the
implementation of the action.
·                        
With Member states
6.           MONITORING AND EVALUATION
6.1.        Monitoring system
Not needed, as
it falls under the established monitoring of Structural Funds.
6.2.        Evaluation
6.2.1.     Ex-ante evaluation
This proposal has been prepared at the
request from the Cabinet of the President of the Commission.
6.2.2.     Measures taken following an
intermediate/ex-post evaluation (lessons learned from similar experiences in
the past)
N/A
6.2.3.     Terms and frequency of
future evaluation
N/A
7.           ANTI-FRAUD MEASURES 
N.A.
8.           DETAILS OF RESOURCES
8.1.        Objectives of the proposal
in terms of their financial cost
Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal
places)
 (Headings of Objectives, actions and outputs should be provided) || Type of output || Av. cost || Year n || Year n+1 || Year n+2 || Year n+3 || Year n+4 || Year n+5 and later || TOTAL 
 No. outputs || Total cost || No. outputs || Total cost || No. outputs || Total cost || No. outputs || Total cost || No. outputs || Total cost || No. outputs || Total cost || No. outputs || Total cost 
 OPERATIONAL OBJECTIVE No.1 Sustain the implementation of the operational programmes ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
   ||   ||   ||   ||   0,000 ||   ||   0,000 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   0,000 
 TOTAL COST ||   ||   ||   ||   0,000 ||   ||   0,000 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   0,000 
8.2.        Administrative Expenditure
8.2.1.     Number and type of human
resources
 Types of post ||   || Staff to be assigned to management of the action using existing and/or additional resources (number of posts/FTEs) 
   ||   || Year n || Year n+1 || Year n+2 || Year n+3 || Year n+4 || Year n+5 
 Officials or temporary staff (XX 01 01) || A*/AD || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 B*, C*/AST || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 Staff financed by art. XX 01 02 || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 Other staff financed by art. XX 01 04/05 || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 TOTAL || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
8.2.2.     Description
of tasks deriving from the action
N/A
8.2.3.     Sources of human resources
(statutory)
(When more than one source is stated,
please indicate the number of posts originating from each of the sources)
¨      Posts currently allocated to the management of the programme
to be replaced or extended
¨      Posts pre-allocated within the APS/PDB exercise for year n
¨      Posts to be requested in the next APS/PDB procedure
¨      Posts to be redeployed using existing resources within the
managing service (internal redeployment)
¨      Posts required for year n although not foreseen in the APS/PDB
exercise of the year in question
8.2.4.     Other Administrative
expenditure included in reference amount (XX 01 04/05 – Expenditure on
administrative management)
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Budget line (number and heading) || Year n || Year n+1 || Year n+2 || Year n+3 || Year n+4 || Year n+5 and later || TOTAL 
 1      Technical and administrative assistance (including related staff costs) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Executive agencies || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 Other technical and administrative assistance || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 - intra muros || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 - extra muros || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 Total Technical and administrative assistance || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
8.2.5.     Financial
cost of human resources and associated costs not included in the reference
amount
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Type of human resources || Year n || Year n+1 || Year n+2 || Year n+3 || Year n+4 || Year n+5 and later 
 Officials and temporary staff (XX 01 01) || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 Staff financed by Art XX 01 02 (auxiliary, END, contract staff, etc.) (specify budget line) || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 Total cost of Human Resources and associated costs (NOT in reference amount) || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
Calculation–
Officials and Temporary agents
Reference
should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable
n.a.
Calculation–
Staff financed under art. XX 01 02
Reference
should be made to Point 8.2.1, if applicable
n.a.
8.2.6.     Other administrative expenditure
not included in reference amount
 EUR million (to 3 decimal places) 
   ||   Year n || Year n+1 || Year n+2 || Year n+3 || Year n+4 || Year n+5 and later || TOTAL 
 XX 01 02 11 01 – Missions || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 XX 01 02 11 02 – Meetings & Conferences || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 XX 01 02 11 03 – Committees || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 XX 01 02 11 04 – Studies & consultations || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 XX 01 02 11 05 - Information systems || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
  2     Total Other Management Expenditure (XX 01 02 11) || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 3      Other expenditure of an administrative nature (specify including reference to budget line) || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
 Total Administrative expenditure, other than human resources and associated costs (NOT included in reference amount) || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. || n.a. 
Calculation
- Other administrative expenditure not included in reference
amount
n.a.
[1]               OJ L , , p. .
[2]               OJ L , , p. .
[3]               OJ L 118, 12.5.2010, p. 1.
[4]               OJ L 30, 4.2.2011, p. 34.
[5]               OJ L 159, 176.2011, p. 88.
[6]               OJ L 53, 23.2.2002, p. 1.
[7]               OJ L 37, 6.2.2009, p. 5.
[8]               OJ L 79, 25.3.2009, p. 39.
[9]               OJ L 150, 13.6.2009, p. 8.
[10]             OJ L 210, 31.7.2006, p. 25.
[11]             This amount includes the full amount for the concerned
years, event when the action is starting in November or December or finishes
part-way trough a year.
[12]             Expenditure that does not fall under Chapter xx 01 of
the Title xx concerned
[13]             Expenditure within article xx 01 04 of Title xx.
[14]             Expenditure within chapter xx 01 other than articles xx
01 04 or xx 01 05.
[15]             See points 19 and 24 of the Inter-institutional agreement.
[16]             Additional columns should be added if necessary i.e. if
the duration of the action exceeds 6 years