CELEX: 62015TN0458
Language: en
Date: 2015-08-10 00:00:00
Title: Case T-458/15: Action brought on 10 August 2015 — Automobile Club di Brescia v OHIM — Rebel Media (e-miglia)

5.10.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 328/31
            
         Action brought on 10 August 2015 — Automobile Club di Brescia v OHIM — Rebel Media (e-miglia)
   (Case T-458/15)
   (2015/C 328/28)
   Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Automobile Club di Brescia (Brescia, Italy) (represented by: F. Celluprica and F. Fischetti, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rebel Media Ltd (Wilmslow, United Kingdom)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘e-miglia’ — Application for registration No 9 782 673
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 June 2015 in Case R 1990/2014-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul only paragraphs 3 and 4 of the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               confirm the decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 30 May 2014 concerning opposition No B 1 900 540 in its entirety, except for the part relating to compensation of expenses;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the other party to pay the costs, including the costs of all proceedings before OHIM.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.