CELEX: 62015TN0075
Language: en
Date: 2015-02-17 00:00:00
Title: Case T-75/15: Action brought on 17 February 2015 — ROD Leichtmetallräder v OHIM — Rodi TR (ROD)

13.4.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 118/39
            
         Action brought on 17 February 2015 — ROD Leichtmetallräder v OHIM — Rodi TR (ROD)
   (Case T-75/15)
   (2015/C 118/50)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: ROD Leichtmetallräder GmbH (Weiden in der Oberpfalz, Germany) (represented by: J. Hellenbrand and J. Biener, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rodi TR, SL (Lleida, Spain)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘ROD’ — Community trade mark No 5 6 94  989
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 December 2014 in Case R 281/2014-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of OHIM’s Cancellation Division of 22 November 2013;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court as well as the costs of the proceedings before OHMI’s Board of Appeal.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 65(2) in connection with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of an essential procedural requirement — infringement of Rules 39(3) and 37(b)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95.