CELEX: C2003/171/43
Language: en
Date: 2003-07-19 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 21 March 2003 in Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge v European Parliament and Council of the European Union (Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons — Measures of direct and individual concern to them — Directive 2002/2/EC — Inadmissibility — Claim for damages)

C 171/26                 EN                           Official Journal of the European Union                                              19.7.2003
Stahlhandel GmbH & Co. KG, established in Essen (Germany),                    repealing Commission Directive 91/357/EEC (OJ 2002 L 63,
and Metal Traders Stahlhandel GmbH, established in Düssel-                    p. 23) and a claim for compensation for the damage allegedly
dorf (Germany) represented by K. Friedrich, lawyer, with an                   suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber),
address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of                  composed of V. Tiili, President of the Chamber, P. Mengozzi
the European Communities (Agents: J. Forman and R. Raith) —                   and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
application, first, for the annulment of Commission Regulation                21 March 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:
(EC) No 560/2002 of 27 March 2002 imposing provisional
safeguard measures against imports of certain steel products
(OJ 2002 L 85, p. 1) and, second, a claim for damages —                       1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible so far as it concerns
the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of                            the annulment of Directive 2002/2/EC of the European
B. Vesterdorf, President R.M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,                             Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 27 March 2003,                         Council Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound
the operative part of which is as follows:                                          feedingstuffs and repealing Commission Directive 91/357/
                                                                                    EEC.
1.     There is no need to give a decision on the claim for annulment.
                                                                              2.    The requests submitted by the defendants that the action, in so
2.     The application for a ruling on the admissibility of the claim               far as it seeks compensation for the damage allegedly suffered,
       for damages is joined to the application on the substance.                   should be held inadmissible, are reserved for final judgment.
3.     The costs are reserved.                                                3.    Costs are reserved.
( 1) OJ C 191 of 10.8.02.
                                                                              (1 ) OJ 2002 C 180.
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                          of 21 March 2003
                                                                                     ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
in Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge v European
      Parliament and Council of the European Union ( 1)                                                 of 31 March 2003
(Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons —
Measures of direct and individual concern to them —                           in Case T-226/02: André Hecq v Commission of the
Directive 2002/2/EC — Inadmissibility — Claim for dam-                                            European Communities (1)
                                  ages)
                                                                              (Officials — Action for annulment — Act adversely affect-
                           (2003/C 171/43)                                                     ing an official — Inadmissibility)
                     (Language of the case: French)
                                                                                                         (2003/C 171/44)
                                                                                                   (Language of the case: French)
In Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge, established in
Bricquebec (France), represented by D. Waelbroeck and
D. Brinckman, lawyers, against European Parliament (Agents:
C. Pennera and Mme E. Waldherr) and Council of the European
Union (Agents: I. Diez Parra and F. P. Ruggeri Laderchi),
supported by Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-                         In Case T-226/02: André Hecq, an official of the Commission
D. Plessing nad M. Lumma) and Commission of the European                      of the European Communities, residing in Mondercange
Communities (Agent: A. Bordes) — application for the annul-                   (Luxembourg), represented by L. Vogel and D. Amatulli,
ment of Directive 2002/2/EC of the European Parliament and                    lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communi-
of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending Council Directive                  ties (Agent: M. Currall) — application for the annulment of the
79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs and                   Commission decision of 15 June 2001 approving the