CELEX: 51997PC0568
Language: en
Date: 1997-11-10
Title: Proposal for a Council Regulation (EC) repealing Regulation (EEC) No 611/93 imposing a definitive anti- dumping duty on imports into the Community of certain electronic microcircuits known as DRAMs originating in the Republic of Korea

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
                                                  Brussels, 10.11.1997
                                                  COM(97) 568 final
                                   Proposal for a
                         COUNCIL REGULATION (EC)
repealing Regulation (EEC) No 611/93 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on
imports into the Community of certain electronic microcircuits known as DRAMs
                      originating in the Republic of Korea
                          (presented by the Commission)
 ---pagebreak---  ---pagebreak---                          EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
(1)  It is hereby proposed that the Commission submit to the Council the attached draft
     Regulation according to which the anti-dumping duty on imports of DRAMs
     (dynamic random access memories) originating in the Republic of Korea will be
     repealed and the anti-dumping proceeding be terminated respectively.
     Consequently, the corresponding undertakings offered by Korean exporters and
     accepted by the Commission will have no further purpose.
(2)  As regards imports of DRAMs originating in Japan, a proposal is being made to the
     Commission to terminate the proceeding thus allowing the measures currently in
     force to expire.
(3)  The attached proposal to repeal the anti-dumping duty results from the withdrawal
     by the complainant of its support for the continuation of the measures. The
     complainant considered it appropriate to take this step in view of the envisaged
     negotiation of voluntary industry-to-industry agreements between the complainant
     Community industry and the Japanese and Korean associations of DRAM
     producers, the aim of which is to prevent the future occurrence of injurious
     dumping and to ensure that, should any anti-dumping investigation be initiated, it
     may be carried out expeditiously. These negotiations are welcomed by the
     Commission. The Community industry has committed itself to notifying any future
     agreement to the competition services of the Commission.
(4)  Several Community users of DRAMS have requested that the anti-dumping duty be
     repealed retroactively as from 10 March 1997, i.e. the date on which the duty was
     reinstated after expiry of the suspension of measures. In this respect, it is
     considered that no general principles of Community law justify this request in the
     present case.
(5)  Interested parties were informed of the reasons why it is intended to propose the
     repeal of the anti-dumping duty. After having considered all the various interests
     involved taken as a whole, it was concluded that the repeal of the anti-dumping
     duty and the termination of the proceeding is not against the Community interest.
(6)  The Advisory Committee of Member States was duly consulted and a majority of
     delegations expressed support for the Commission's proposal. Nevertheless, four
     Member States objected to the termination of the proceeding on the grounds that
     termination would be premature at present since the negotiations between the
     Community industry and the Japanese and Korean associations of DRAM
     producers have yet to be concluded. However, given the withdrawal of support by
     the complainant, the only appropriate course of action is to terminate the
     proceeding immediately.
 (7)  It is therefore proposed that the Commission adopt the attached proposal for a
      Council Regulation and transmit it to the Council, together with the attached report
      on the consultation of the Advisory Committee.
                                           A
 ---pagebreak---                                            Proposal for a
                                  COUNCIL REGULATION (EC)
  repealing Regulation (EEC) No 611/93 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on
   Imports into the Community of certain electronic microcircuits known as DRAMs
                             originating in the Republic of Korea
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European'Community,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of 22 December 1995 on
protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European
Community,1 as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2331/96,2 and in particular Article
il(3) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal submitted by the Commission after consulting the
Advisory Committee,
Whereas:
                                A. PREVIOUS PROCEDURE
(1)   By Decision 93/157/EEC,3 the Commission accepted undertakings from ail known
      Korean DRAM producers which exported this product to the Community. The
      Council, by Regulation (EEC) No 611/93,4-imposed a residual duty on imports of
      DRAMs originating in the Republic of Korea in order to bring non-co-operating
      parties within the scope of the measures against the dumping of DRAMs and to
      underpin the undertakings.
(2)   In June 1995, the Commission decided to suspend the above anti-dumping
      measures for a period of nine months.5 In March 1996, the suspension was
      extended by the Council for a further period of 12 months.6
                              Bo REVIEW INVESTIGATION
(3)   In July 1995, the Commission initiated on its own initiative an interim review
      concerning imports of DRAMs originating in Japan and the Republic of Korea
      pursuant to Article 11(3) of Council Regulation. (EC) No 384/96 (hereinafter
      referred to as the 'Basic Regulation').7
                       C. PRODUCT UNDER CONSIDERATION •
        OJNoL56,6.3. 1996, p. 1.
        OJNoL317,6. 12. 1996, p. 1.
        OJ No L 66, 18. 3.1993, p. 37.
        OJN0L66, 18.3. 1993,p. 1.
        Commission Decision (95/197/EC), OJ No L 126,9. 6. 1995, p. 56.
        Council Regulation (EC) No 399/96, OJ No L 55,6. 3.1996, p. 1.
        OJ Mo C1S1, 15. 7. 1995, p. 13.
                                             I
 ---pagebreak--- (4) The product concerned by this investigation is dynamic random access memories
       (DRAMs), whether in processed wafer form or dice form, assembled or further
       processed onto modules, manufactured using variations of Metal Oxide
       Semiconductor (MOS) process technology, including CMOS and BiCMOS etc.,
       and including, without limitation, product variations using DRAM technology such
       as VRAMs, Pseudo SRAMs, S-DRAMs (synchronous DRAMs), MDRAMs
       (multibank DRAMs), R-DRAMs (RAMBUS-DRAMs), of all densities (including
       future densities), irrespective of access speed, configuration, frame or package, etc.
(5)    The product is currently classifiable under the following CN codes: 8542 13 11,
       8542 13 13, 8542 13 15, 8542 13 17, 8542 19 01, 8542 19 05 (for finished
        DRAMs), 8542 13 01 (for DRAM wafers), 8542 13 05 (for DRAM dice or chips),
        8548 90 00, 8473 30 10 and 8473 50 10 (for DRAM modules, DRAM boards and
        DRAM cards).
                  D. DEFINITION OF THE COMMUNITY INDUSTRY
 (6)    The Community industry concerned by this review consists of Motorola Ltd (UK),
        Siemens (D) and Texas Instruments Italia (I). All of them co-operated in this
        investigation and are members of the European Electronic Component
        Manufacturers' Association (EECA), which lodged the original complaint.
 (7)    The collective output of the above-mentioned Community industry constitutes a
         major proportion of the total Community production of DRAMs in accordance with
         Article 4(1) of the Basic Regulation.
                E. WITHDRAWAL OF SUPPORT TO THE PROCEEDING
  (8)    In July 1997, the Community industry withdrew its support for the continuation of
         the existing anti-dumping measures, (both with respect to imports from Japan and
         from Korea). The complainant considered it appropriate to take this step in view of
         the envisaged negotiation of voluntary industry-to-industry agreements between
         the complainant Community industry and the Japanese and Korean associations of
         DRAM producers, the aim of which is to prevent the future occurrence of injurious
         dumping and to ensure that, should any anti-dumping investigation be initiated, it
         may be carried out expeditiously. The Community industry has committed itself to
         notify the agreements, if any, to the Commission under the competition rules.
            F. REPEAL OF THE ANTI-DUMPING DUTY AND TERMINATION OF
                                         THE PROCEEDING
  (9)    It follows from the principle expressed in Article 9(1) of the Basic Regulation that
         when the Community industry withdraws its support to the continuation of the anti-
         dumping measures, the proceeding must be terminated unless such termination
          would not be in the Community interest. The investigation has not brought to light
          any aspects which would support the continuation of the measures in these
         circumstances.
   (10) In view of the above, the Commission informed the interested parties of its
          intention to propose to the Council to repeal the anti-dumping duty in force and to
                                                  3>
 ---pagebreak---       terminate the proceeding following the withdrawal of support. No further
      arguments were raised concerning the Community interest aspects.
(11) However, several Community users of DRAMs have requested that ths anti-
      dumping duty be repealed and the proceeding be terminated retroactively as from
      10 March 1997, i.e. the date on which the anti-dumping duty was reinstated after
      expiry of the suspension of the measures. As a consequence, anti-dumping duties
      paid after this date would have to be reimbursed.
(12) The users have argued that, following the reinstatement of the anti-dumping duties
      in March 1997, they could not always avoid paying anti-dumping duty by
      purchasing DRAMs through sales channels covered by the undertakings. These
      parties have further claimed that, due to the reference price system of the price
      undertakings, (which were likewise reinstated in March 1997), they had to pay
      higher prices for DRAMs purchased in the Community than competitors in the rest
      of the world. The users concerned have claimed that these circumstances have had
      a negative impact on their competitiveness.
(13) The users also referred to the disclosure of the preliminary findings of the
      Commission's services. They noted that it had been envisaged by the
      Commission's services that, as regards Japan, a lower residual duty should be
      imposed with retroactive effect from 10 March 1997, the date of the reinstatement
      of the anti-dumping measures. Had the investigation been concluded in this way,
      the difference between the initial and the final duty rate would have been refunded
      to importers which would have paid anti-dumping duty. The users have argued that,
      if retroactivity was considered justified on the hypothesis that the measures would
      be reimposed, then retroactivity would, a fortiori, be justified where the
      investigation was being concluded by the termination of the proceeding.
 (14) With regard to the above-mentioned request, it is considered thai, as the Basic
       Regulation does not provide for the retroactive termination of proceedings, this
       request could only be accepted if justified by general principles of Community law.
    . However, none of these principles apply in the current case.
 (Î5) In one anti-dumping proceeding, the review was terminated retroactively on the
       grounds that the anti-dumping measures had been prolonged by more than three
       years due to the long duration of the (sun-set) review investigation8. However, the
        facts of this case are not comparable to the current proceeding, since this is an
        interim review which took place during the normal five year period. Moreover, the
        anti-dumping measures in the current proceeding were suspended between lune
         1995 and March 1997s i.e. for all but a few months of the period by which the
        measures were prolonged by the review. The Community user industry, which had
        requested and has benefited from this suspension, thus cannot be considered to
        have been unduly burdened by this review investigation.
  (16) As regards the argument raised by the' users in respect of imports through sales
         channels subject to the residual duties, such difficulties are inherent to the structure
         of the measures, and cannot be considered as-justifying a retroactive termination.
           Council Regulation (EEC) No 2655/93, OJ No L 244, 30.9.1993, p. 1
                                                    V
 ---pagebreak--- (17) Moreover, it cannot be accepted that the users were unduly burdened if, as claimed,
       they had to purchase Japanese and Korean DRAMs at prices above the prices
       outside the Community, due to the reference price system. The reference prices,
       which were continuously amended to reflect changes in normal value, ensured only
       that imports covered by the undertakings were not made at dumped prices, and
       sales in third markets at prices below the reference prices can therefore be assumed
       to have been dumped. The fact that dumping in third countries has enabled users in
       those countries to enjoy a competitive advantage over users in the Community is
       not considered a relevant argument for the retroactive repeal of the residual duties.
(18) Furthermore, it is considered that the users' request cannot be based on the fact that
       the Commission had, in disclosing its provisional findings in the investigation,
       indicated that, in the event of a final determination that the likelihood of a
       recurrence of dumping and injury justified the reimposition of measures, the
        amended anti-dumping duty for Japan could be imposed retroactively. The
       provisional character of these indications was understood by all interested parties,
        so that legitimate expectations could not arise on these grounds.
(19) In addition, retroactive termination, giving rise to the reimbursement of anti-
        dumping duties paid as from 10 March 1997, would discriminate against those
       exporters which adhered to the reference prices set under the undertakings, and
        against those importers who have purchased at these prices. This would be the case
        in particular, if, as the users have submitted, thé prices in the Community had been
        higher than the world market prices, due to the reference price system.
(20) Finally, it should be noted that any anti-dumping duty paid may always be
        reimbursed through a request for a refund, pursuant to Article 11(8) of the Basic
        Regulation
 (21) In the light of the above, the request for the retroactive repeal of the anti-dumping
        duty is rejected.
 (22) After having considered all the various interests involved taken as a whole, it was
        concluded that the anti-dumping duty on DRAMs from the Republic of Korea
        should be repealed and that the proceeding thereby terminated. Consequently, the
        corresponding undertakings offered by Korean exporters and accepted by
        Commission Decision (93/157/EEC) have no further purpose.
 HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
                                              Article 1
 Regulation (EEC) No 611/93 is hereby repealed and the proceeding concerning imports
 of DRAMs originating in the Republic of Korea terminated.
                                              Article 2
  This Regulation shall enter into force on the day of its publication in the Official Journal
  of the European Communities.
                                                   r
 ---pagebreak--- This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member
States
Done at Brussels,
                                                          For the Council
                                               £
 ---pagebreak---                                                                            I/262/97-EN
        REPORT ON THE RESULTS OF THE CONSULTATION OF THE
                ANTI-DUMPING COMMITTEE ON 23 JULY 1997
Subject:        Anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of DRAMs
                (dynamic random access memories) originating in Japan and the
                Republic of Korea - termination of the proceedings and repeal
                ot the anti-dumping duties in force
1) The present anti-dumping review investigation was initiated on 15 July 1995.
    The basic regulation applicable is Council Regulation (EC) N° 384/96 of 22
    December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not
    members of the European Community.
2) The Commission presented its conclusions in the above mentioned investigation
    to the members of the Anti-Dumping Advisory Committee on 23 July 1997,
    where it proposed that the proceedings be terminated. The Commission's proposal
    was based on the withdrawal of support for the continuation of the measures by
    the complainant in the proceedings. Their decision is to be seen against the
    background of the prospect of securing an industry-to-industry agreement on data
    collection between the complainant Community industry and the Japanese and
    Korean associations of DRAM producers, by means of which the future
    occurrence of dumping should be prevented and any anti-dumping investigation
    expeditiously carried out. The withdrawal of support is considered by the
    Community industry a means to facilitate the négociations concerning the above-
     mentioned agreement.
3) At the meeting the following Member States expressed support for the
     Commission's proposal: Ireland, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Belgium, United
     Kingdom, Holland, France, Greece, Luxembourg and Spain. Whereas Italy,
     Germany, Austria and Portugal opposed the Commission's proposal.
 4) Lack of unanimity centered around the perceived influence the decision to
     terminate could have on the ongoing negotiations for the industry-to industry data
     collection scheme.
 5) In view of the above mentioned opposition on the part of certain Member States
     to the Commission's proposal, the matter is consequently referred to the Council
     further to Article 9(2) of Council Regulation (EC) N° 384/96.
 6) Enclosed are the Council Regulation repealing the anti-dumping duty on imports
     of DRAMs originating in the Republic of Korea and the Commission Decision
     terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning DRAMs originating in
     Japan. It is proposed that the Council adopt the Regulation. With respect to the
      Commission Decision, in accordance with Article 9(2) of the above mentioned
      regulation, the proceedings shall stand terminated if, within one month, the
      Council, acting by a qualified majority has not yet decided otherwise.
                                                ¥
 ---pagebreak---                                                                   ISSN 0254-1475
                                                           COM(97) 568 final
                                              DOCUMENTS
EN                                                                    02 il
                                    Catalogue number : CB-CO-97-589-EN-C
                                                             ISBN 92-78-26868-2
Office for Official Publications of the European Communities
L-2985 Luxembourg