CELEX: 62007FB0042
Language: en
Date: 2011-09-28 00:00:00
Title: Case F-42/07: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Prieto v Parliament (Staff case — Officials — Appointment — Internal competition published before 1 May 2004 — Member of the temporary staff appearing on the list of suitable candidates before 1 May 2006 — Grading — Articles 5(4) and 13(1) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations — Secretarial allowance — Action in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)

19.11.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 340/39
            
         Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 28 September 2011 — Prieto v Parliament
   (Case F-42/07) (1)
   
   (Staff case - Officials - Appointment - Internal competition published before 1 May 2004 - Member of the temporary staff appearing on the list of suitable candidates before 1 May 2006 - Grading - Articles 5(4) and 13(1) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Secretarial allowance - Action in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)
   2011/C 340/79
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Antonio Prieto (Bousval, Belgium) (represented by É. Boigelot, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Parliament (represented, initially, by C. Burgos and K. Zejdová, and subsequently by K. Zejdová and N.B. Rasmussen, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Annulment of the decision of the 9 June 2006 appointing the applicant, at that time a member of the temporary staff in Grade AST 3 and a successful candidate in internal competition C/348 for career C5-4, a probationary official in Grade AST 2, step 3.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action of MrPrieto is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Each party is ordered to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 140 of 23.06.07, p. 47.