CELEX: 62017TA0369
Language: en
Date: 2018-06-07 00:00:00
Title: Case T-369/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2018 — Winkler v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Decision establishing the number of pensionable years of service — Reasonable period — Right to be heard — Legal certainty — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Liability — Material damage)

201807060641994552018/C 259/483692017TC25920180723EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180607353511Case T-369/17: Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2018 — Winkler v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Decision establishing the number of pensionable years of service — Reasonable period — Right to be heard — Legal certainty — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Liability — Material damage)
 ---documentbreak--- C2592018EN3510120180607EN0048351351Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2018 — Winkler v Commission
   (Case T-369/17) (
         1
      )
   ‛(Civil service — Officials — Transfer of national pension rights — Decision establishing the number of pensionable years of service — Reasonable period — Right to be heard — Legal certainty — Equal treatment — Legitimate expectations — Liability — Material damage)’2018/C 259/48Language of the case: German
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Bernd Winkler (Grange, Ireland) (represented by: A. Kässens, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of the Commission of 26 September 2016, establishing the number of pensionable years of service to be taken into account in the pension scheme of the EU institutions following the applicant’s request to transfer pension rights acquired before he entered the service of the European Union, and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the Commission’s unlawful conduct in processing his transfer request.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
            1.
         
         
            Dismisses the action;
         
      
            2.
         
         
            Orders each party to bear its own costs.
         
      (
         1
      )	OJ C 249, 31.7.2017.