CELEX: C2004/300/37
Language: en
Date: 2004-12-04 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 12 October 2004 in Case C-106/03 P: Vedial SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Likelihood of confusion — Word and figurative mark HUBERT — Opposition of the proprietor of the national word mark SAINT-HUBERT 41 — Capacity of OHIM as defendant before the Court of First Instance)

4.12.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 300/18
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
   
   (Second Chamber)
   of 12 October 2004
   in Case C-106/03 P: Vedial SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Community trade mark - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Likelihood of confusion - Word and figurative mark HUBERT - Opposition of the proprietor of the national word mark SAINT-HUBERT 41 - Capacity of OHIM as defendant before the Court of First Instance)
   (2004/C 300/37)
   Language of the case: French
   In Case C-106/03 P: appeal under Article 56 of the Statute of the Court of Justice, lodged at the Court on 27 February 2003, Vedial SA, established in Ludres (France), (avocats: T. van Innis, G. Glas and F. Herbert) and Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: O. Montalto and P. Geroulakos — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen, F. Macken (Rapporteur), and N. Colneric, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 12 October 2004, in which it has ruled:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the appeal;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Vedial SA to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 146 of 21.6.2003.