CELEX: 62021TN0303
Language: en
Date: 2021-05-31 00:00:00
Title: Case T-303/21: Action brought on 31 May 2021 — FC v EASO

19.7.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 289/46
            
         
      Action brought on 31 May 2021 — FC v EASO
      (Case T-303/21)
      (2021/C 289/62)
      Language of the case: Greek
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: FC (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (EASO)
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the General Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested measure rejecting the applicant’s complaint of 26 March 2021 under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union; and
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to pay the entirety of the costs incurred by the applicant.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law:
      The contested measure is vitiated by a breach of the principle of procedural economy and by an infringement of the applicant’s right to effective judicial protection, on the following grounds:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  infringement of the applicant’s right of defence, since the defendant continues not to connect the disciplinary proceedings with errors and infringements of fundamental rights committed by the defendant at the earlier stage — that is to say, at the pre-disciplinary stage — which also produce effects at the subsequent stage of the disciplinary proceedings; and
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  infringement of the applicant’s right to be heard.