CELEX: C2006/326/115
Language: en
Date: 2006-12-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-138/02: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 November 2006 — Nanjing Metalink v Council (Dumping — Imports of ferro molybdenum originating in China — Revocation of market economy treatment — Article 2(7)(b) and (c) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96)

30.12.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 326/54
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 November 2006 — Nanjing Metalink v Council
   (Case T-138/02) (1)
   
   (Dumping - Imports of ferro molybdenum originating in China - Revocation of market economy treatment - Article 2(7)(b) and (c) and Article 6(1) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96)
   (2006/C 326/115)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Nanjing Metalink International Co. Ltd (Nanjing, China) (represented by: P. Waer, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Marquardt, assisted by G.M. Berrisch, lawyer)
   
      Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: T. Scharf and S. Meany, Agents)
   Re:
   Annulment of Article 1 of Council Regulation (EC) No 215/2002 of 28 January 2002 imposing definitive anti-dumping duties on imports of ferro molybdenum originating in the People's Republic of China (OJ 2002 L 35, p. 1), in so far as it imposes an anti-dumping duty on imports of ferro molybdenum produced by the applicant.
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the application;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the Commission to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 169, 13.7.2002.