CELEX: 52012PC0234
Language: en
Date: 2012-05-25
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION adjusting the correction coefficients applicable to the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Union

|
			
		
		
		52012PC0234
		
			Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION adjusting the correction coefficients applicable to the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Union /* COM/2012/0234 final - 2012/0118 (NLE) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
·      Grounds for and objectives of the proposal
In accordance with Article 4(1) of
Annex XI to the Staff Regulations, intermediate adjustments of
remuneration and pensions under Article 65(2) of the Staff Regulations are to
be made, on the basis of information provided by Eurostat, in the event of a
substantial change in the cost of living between June and December, with due
allowance being made for the forecast of the change in purchasing power during
the current annual reference period.
Any Commission proposal needed is to be sent to
the Council not later than the second half of April.
·      General context 
In accordance with Article 6(1) of
Annex XI to the Staff Regulations, intermediate adjustments are to be made
for all places (including Brussels) if the sensitivity threshold has been
reached or exceeded in Brussels. If that sensitivity threshold for Brussels is
not reached, intermediate adjustments are only to be made for those places
where the sensitivity threshold has been exceeded.
In accordance with Article 7 of Annex XI
to the Staff Regulations, the amount of the intermediate adjustment is the
Brussels International Index multiplied, where appropriate, by half of the
specific indicator forecast if this is negative.
The specific indicator measures changes in the real
net remuneration, exclusive of inflation, of national civil servants in Member
States’ central governments. Eurostat has calculated this indicator on the
basis of the information supplied by the eight Member States referred to in
Article 1(4) of Annex XI to the Staff Regulations.
The Brussels International Index measures
changes in the cost of living in Brussels for officials and other servants of the
European Union. Eurostat has drawn up this index on the basis of the data
provided by the Belgian authorities.
The correction coefficients are the ratio
between the relevant economic parity and the exchange rate provided for in
Article 63 of the Staff Regulations multiplied, if the adjustment threshold is
not reached for Brussels, by the amount of the adjustment.
The economic parities for remuneration
establish the purchasing power equivalence of the remuneration paid in
Brussels, as the reference city, with that paid in the other places of
employment. Eurostat has calculated those parities in agreement with the
national statistical bodies of the Member States.
The economic parities for pensions establish
the purchasing power equivalence of the pension paid in Belgium, as the
reference country, with that paid in the other countries of residence. Eurostat
has calculated those parities in agreement with the national statistical bodies
of the Member States.
·      Existing provisions in the area of the proposal
This proposal is in addition to the proposal
presented each year for adjusting remuneration and pensions.
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS
WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
·      Consultation of interested parties
Methods of consultation used, main
sectors covered and general profile of respondents
The elements of the proposal have been
discussed with the staff representatives in accordance with the appropriate
procedures.
Summary of replies received and the way
in which they have been taken into account
The proposal takes account of the opinions of
the parties consulted.
·      Collection and use of expertise
There was no need for external expertise.
·      Impact assessment
–     
The purpose of the proposal is to adjust
remuneration and pensions in accordance with the legislation in force.
–     
The legislation in force permits no alternative.
3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE
PROPOSAL
·      Summary of the proposed action
In accordance with Article 4 of Annex XI to the
Staff Regulations, the purpose of the proposed action is to adjust remuneration
and pensions in those places in which there has been a substantial change in
the cost of living.
The change in the cost of living for Brussels,
measured by the Brussels International Index, over the period June to December
of the previous year, is 1.1 %. 
Changes in the cost of living outside Belgium and
Luxembourg during the reference period are measured by the implicit indices
calculated by Eurostat. These indices are calculated by multiplying the
Brussels International Index by the change in the economic parity.
The sensitivity threshold for a substantial
change in the cost of living is the percentage corresponding to 7 % for a
twelve-month period (3.5 % for a six-month period).
The implicit index applicable to remuneration has
exceeded the sensitivity threshold in Estonia (4.1 %). The implicit index
applicable to pensions has not reached the sensitivity threshold in any of the
countries.
The amount of the intermediate adjustment is
the Brussels International Index multiplied, where appropriate, by half of the
specific indicator forecast if this is negative.
The specific indicator forecast is -1.6%, and
thus the amount of the intermediate adjustment is 0.3 %.
The correction coefficients are the ratio
between the relevant economic parity and the exchange rate multiplied, if the
adjustment sensitivity threshold is not reached for Brussels, by the amount of
the intermediate adjustment.
The new correction coefficients take effect on
1 January. However, for those countries or places whose implicit index is
greater than 6.3 %, they take effect on 16 November. For those countries
or places whose implicit index is greater than 12.6 %, they take effect on
1 November.
The correction coefficient for Tallinn calculated
for December 2011 (on the basis of PPP for staff at December 2011) is 77.6. As a
result, taking into account
the amount of the intermediate adjustment, with effect from
1 January 2012, the correction coefficient applicable to remuneration of officials
and other servants of the European Union in Estonia is 77.8. The correction
coefficients applicable to pensions and transfers remain unchanged.
·      Legal basis
The Staff Regulations, and in particular Annex
XI thereto, constitute the legal basis.
·      Subsidiarity principle
The proposal concerns an area that falls within
the exclusive competence of the Union. The principle of subsidiarity does not
therefore apply.
·      Proportionality principle
The proposal is consistent with the principle
of proportionality for the following reasons:
–     
Annex XI to the Staff Regulations provides for a
Council Regulation.
–     
The financial burden results directly from
application of the method of adjustment of remuneration and pensions provided
for in the Staff Regulations.
·      Choice of instruments
Proposed instrument(s): Regulation.
Other instruments would have been inappropriate
for the following reasons:
–     
Annex XI to the Staff Regulations provides for a
Council Regulation.
4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION
The impact of the adjustment to the correction
coefficients applicable to the remuneration and pensions of officials and other
servants of the European Union on both administrative expenditure is detailed
in the financial statement annexed hereto.
Although the intermediate adjustment takes into
account the increase in the cost of living for EU staff in Estonia, it results
in lower expenditure. This is due to the Council's failure to adopt the
Commission Proposal on the annual adjustment[1]
in December 2011. The 2011 annual adjustment would have lowered the value of
the correction coefficient for Estonia from 78.5 to 75.4. However, as the
annual adjustment was not adopted, the former value of 78.5 remained in force. The
new Eurostat calculation for the intermediate adjustment shows that the cost of
living in Estonia increased from 75.4 to 77.8. Since this new intermediate
adjustment value is lower than the value currently in force, the intermediate
adjustment results in lower expenditure.
2012/0118 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL REGULATION
adjusting the correction coefficients
applicable to the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of
the European Union
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union,
Having regard to the Protocol on the
Privileges and Immunities of the European Union, and in particular Article 12
thereof,
Having regard to the Staff Regulations of Officials
of the European Union and to the Conditions of Employment of other servants of
the Union, as laid down by Regulation (EEC, Euratom, ECSC) No 259/68[2], and in particular Articles 64,
65(2) of the Staff Regulations and Annexes VII, XI and XIII thereto, and the
first paragraph of Article 20, Articles 64 and 92 of the Conditions of
Employment of Other Servants,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
Whereas:
(1)       There was a substantial increase
in the cost of living in Estonia in the period from June to December 2011; the correction
coefficients applied to the remuneration of officials and other servants of the
Union should therefore be adjusted.
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:
Article 1
With effect from 1 January 2012, the correction
coefficients applicable, under Article 64 of the Staff Regulations, to the
remuneration of officials and other servants employed in the countries and
places listed below shall be as follows:
–     
Estonia 77,8.
Article 2
This Regulation shall enter into force on
the day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the
European Union.
This Regulation shall be binding in its
entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.
Done at Brussels, 
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
Annexe
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
1.           FRAMEWORK OF THE
PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
1.1.        Title of the
proposal/initiative 
Proposal for a Council Regulation adjusting the correction
coefficients applicable to the remuneration and pensions of officials and other
servants of the European Union
1.2.        Policy area(s) concerned
in the ABM/ABB structure[3] 
All areas and activities are potentially concerned.
1.3.        Nature of the
proposal/initiative 
ý The
proposal/initiative relates to a new action (periodical, adjusting the regulation in force)
1.4.        Objectives
1.4.1.     Expected result(s) and
impact
Specify the effects
which the proposal/initiative should have on the beneficiaries/groups targeted.
The adjustment of the correction coefficient applicable to the remuneration
of officials and other servants of the European Union in Estonia following a
substantial change in the cost of living there will result in maintaining the
purchasing power equivalence between different places of employment as provided
in the Staff Regulations. 
1.5.        Grounds for the
proposal/initiative 
1.5.1.     Requirement(s) to be met in
the short or long term 
To ensure that in the event of a substantial change in the cost of
living, the correction coefficients applicable to the remuneration and pensions
of officials and other servants of the European Union are adjusted, and if
appropriate applied retrospectively. To ensure that evolution of the purchasing
power of EU civil servants' remuneration and pensions follows the changes in
the purchasing power of civil servants of central government in the Member
States, as referred to in Annex XI to the Staff Regulations. To ensure that the
parallelism of purchasing powers between staff working in different duty
stations is maintained.
1.6.        Duration and financial
impact 
ý Proposal/initiative of unlimited
duration
–     
Implementation with a start-up period from 1
January 2012,
–     
followed by full-scale operation.
1.7.        Management mode(s) envisaged[4] 
ý Centralised direct management by the
Commission: PMO.
2.           ESTIMATED FINANCIAL
IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
2.1.        Heading(s) of the
multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected 
·      Existing expenditure budget lines 
In order of
multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
 Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution 
 Number [Description………………………...……….] || Diff./non-diff ([5]) || from EFTA[6] countries || from candidate countries[7] || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 18(1)(aa) of the Financial Regulation 
   || XX.01.01.01 || non-diff. || NO || NO || NO || NO 
2.2.        Estimated impact on
expenditure 
2.2.1.     Summary of estimated impact
on expenditure 
EUR million (to 3
decimal places)
 Heading of multiannual financial framework: || Number || XX.01.01.01 and Chapter 11, Chapter 42 Expenditure Relating to Parliamentary Assistants 
 DG: HR ||   ||   || Year N[8] || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
  Operational appropriations ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Number of budget line || Commitments || (1) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (2) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Number of budget line || Commitments || (1a) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (2a) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes[9] ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Number of budget line ||   || (3) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations for DG HR || Commitments || =1+1a +3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || =2+2a +3 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (5) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADING <….> of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || =4+ 6 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || =5+ 6 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
If more than one heading is affected by the proposal /
initiative:
  TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (5) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 4 of the multiannual financial framework (Reference amount) || Commitments || =4+ 6 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || =5+ 6 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Heading of multiannual financial framework: || 5 || " Administrative expenditure " 
EUR million (to 3
decimal places)
   ||   ||   || Year 2012 || Year 2013 || Year 2014 || Year 2015 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 DG: <…….> || 
  Human resources ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  Other administrative expenditure ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL DG || Appropriations ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework || (Total commitments = Total payments) || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || not available 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
   ||   ||   || Year 2012 || Year 2013 || Year 2014 || Year 2015 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADINGS 1 to 5 of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || not available 
 Payments || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || -0,002 || not available 
2.2.2.     Estimated impact on
operational appropriations 
–     
ý  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of operational
appropriations 
2.2.3.     Estimated impact on
appropriations of an administrative nature
2.2.3.1.  Summary 
–     
¨  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of administrative
appropriations 
–     
¨  The proposal/initiative requires the use of administrative
appropriations, as explained below:
EUR million (to 3
decimal places)
   || Year N [10] || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || TOTAL 
 HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Human resources ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Other administrative expenditure ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Subtotal HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Outside HEADING 5[11] of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Human resources ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Other expenditure of an administrative nature ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Subtotal outside HEADING 5 of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
2.2.3.2.  
2.2.3.3.  Estimated requirements of
human resources 
–     
ý  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human
resources 
2.2.4.     Compatibility with the
current multiannual financial framework 
–     
ý  The proposal/initiative is compatible the current multiannual
financial framework.
2.2.5.     Third-party contributions 
–     
ý The proposal/initiative does not provide for co-financing by third
parties
2.3.        Estimated impact on
revenue 
–     
ý  Proposal/initiative has no financial impact on revenue.
[1]               COM (2011) 820.
[2]               OJ L 56, 4.3.1968, p. 1.
[3]               ABM: Activity-Based Management – ABB: Activity-Based
Budgeting.
[4]               Details of management modes and references to the
Financial Regulation may be found on the BudgWeb site: http://www.cc.cec/budg/man/budgmanag/budgmanag_en.html
[5]               Diff. = Differentiated appropriations / Non-Diff. =
Non-differentiated appropriations
[6]               EFTA: European Free Trade Association. 
[7]               Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential
candidate countries from the Western Balkans.
[8]               Year N is the year in which implementation of the
proposal/initiative starts.
[9]               Technical and/or administrative assistance and
expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions
(former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.
[10]             Year N is the year in which implementation of the
proposal/initiative starts.
[11]             Technical and/or administrative assistance and
expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions
(former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.