CELEX: 62016TB0590
Language: en
Date: 2018-06-08 00:00:00
Title: Case T-590/16: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2018 — Spychalski v Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Notice of competition — Open Competition EPSO/AD 177/10-ECO2013 — Assessment of the main language — Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list — Manifest lack of jurisdiction — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

201807130622003712018/C 268/465902016TC26820180730EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180608373822Case T-590/16: Order of the General Court of 8 June 2018 — Spychalski v Commission (Civil service — Recruitment — Notice of competition — Open Competition EPSO/AD 177/10-ECO2013 — Assessment of the main language — Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list — Manifest lack of jurisdiction — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
 ---documentbreak--- C2682018EN3720120180608EN0046372382Order of the General Court of 8 June 2018 — Spychalski v Commission
   (Case T-590/16) (
         1
      )
   ‛(Civil service — Recruitment — Notice of competition — Open Competition EPSO/AD 177/10-ECO2013 — Assessment of the main language — Decision not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list — Manifest lack of jurisdiction — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)’2018/C 268/46Language of the case: Polish
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Michał Spychalski (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: A. Żołyniak, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Herrmann and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the selection board in Open Competition EPSO/AD 177/10-ECO2013, organised by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list and, secondly, that the appointing authority be required to add the applicant’s name to the reserve list established on the basis of the open competition in question, subject to the period of validity of the addition being equal to the period of validity of the list.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   The Court:
   
            1.
         
         
            Dismisses the action on the basis that it is in part manifestly lacking any basis in law and in part on the ground that the General Court manifestly lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine it;
         
      
            2.
         
         
            Orders Michał Spychalski to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.
         
      (
         1
      )	OJ C 383, 17.10.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-20/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).