CELEX: 62019TN0184
Language: en
Date: 2019-03-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-184/19: Action brought on 27 March 2019 — Aurea Biolabs v EUIPO — Avizel (AUREA BIOLABS)

20.5.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 172/43
            
         
      Action brought on 27 March 2019 — Aurea Biolabs v EUIPO — Avizel (AUREA BIOLABS)
      (Case T-184/19)
      (2019/C 172/57)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Aurea Biolabs Pte Ltd (Cochin, India) (represented by: B. Brandreth, QC and L. Oommen, Solicitor)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Avizel SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
      
         Trade mark at issue: Application for figurative mark AUREA BIOLABS — Application for registration No 15 836 737
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2019 in Case R 814/2018-2 (CORR)
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the payment of the Applicant’s costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  In support of its decision, the Board of Appeal relies on an invalid provision of law;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Had there been an obvious error of law, the appropriate course was to revoke the previous decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council and of the principles of natural justice.