CELEX: 62012CB0025
Language: en
Date: 2012-07-04 00:00:00
Title: Case C-25/12 P: Order of the Court of 4 July 2012 — Gino Trevisanato v European Commission (Appeal — Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure — Application seeking an order that the Commission take a position concerning the interpretation and the transposition of a directive — Manifest inadmissibility)

6.10.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 303/7
            
         Order of the Court of 4 July 2012 — Gino Trevisanato v European Commission
   (Case C-25/12 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Article 119 of the Rules of Procedure - Application seeking an order that the Commission take a position concerning the interpretation and the transposition of a directive - Manifest inadmissibility)
   2012/C 303/14
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Gino Trevisanato (represented by L. Sulfaro, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Commission
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the Order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 December 2011 in Case T-510/11 Trevisanato v Commission, in which the General Court dismissed an action seeking an order that the Commission take a position on the complaint lodged by the applicant — Failure by the Commission to adopt a binding opinion on the scope of Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies — (OJ 1998 L 225, p. 16) — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the General Court — Conditions for application of Article 111 of the Rules and Procedures of the General Court
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Trevisanato is ordered to bear his own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 65, 3.3.2012.