CELEX: 62011TA0068
Language: en
Date: 2013-06-06 00:00:00
Title: Case T-68/11: Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2013 — Kastenholz v OHIM — Qwatchme (Watch dials) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Community design representing watch dials — Earlier unregistered designs — Ground for invalidity — Novelty — Articles 4, 5 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Individual character — Different overall impression — Articles 4, 6 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 — Earlier copyright — Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002)

3.8.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 225/66
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 6 June 2013 — Kastenholz v OHIM — Qwatchme (Watch dials)
   (Case T-68/11) (1)
   
   (Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Community design representing watch dials - Earlier unregistered designs - Ground for invalidity - Novelty - Articles 4, 5 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Individual character - Different overall impression - Articles 4, 6 and 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Earlier copyright - Article 25(1)(f) of Regulation No 6/2002)
   2013/C 225/146
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Erich Kastenholz (Troisdorf, Germany) (represented by: L. Acker, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented: initially by S. Hanne, and subsequently by D. Walicka, acting as Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Qwatchme A/S (Løsning, Denmark) (represented by: M. Zöbisch, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 November 2010 (Case R 1086/2009-3) concerning invalidity proceedings between Erich Kastenholz and Qwatchme A/S.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Mr Erich Kastenholz to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 113, 9.4.2011.