CELEX: 62005FA0022
Language: en
Date: 2009-09-23 00:00:00
Title: Case F-22/05 RENV: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2009 — Neophytou v Commission (Civil service — Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside — Open competition — Not included on the reserve list — Selection board — Appointment)

21.11.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 282/63
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 23 September 2009 — Neophytou v Commission
   (Case F-22/05 RENV) (1)
   
   (Civil service - Referral back to the Tribunal after setting aside - Open competition - Not included on the reserve list - Selection board - Appointment)
   2009/C 282/118
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Neophytos Neophytou (Itzig, Luxembourg) (represented by: S.A. Pappas, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the decision of the selection board for open competition EPSO/A/1/03 for the constitution of a reserve list of assistant administrators (A8) having Cypriot citizenship not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list of successful candidates — Case T-43/07 P referred back after appeal)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Mr Neophytou to bear half of his own costs relating to the proceedings before the Tribunal and the Court of First Instance;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the Commission of the European Communities to pay, in addition to all its own costs relating to the proceedings before the Tribunal and the Court of First Instance, half of the costs incurred by Mr Neophytou relating to those proceeding.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 155, 25.6.2005, p. 29.