CELEX: C2001/275/22
Language: en
Date: 2001-09-29 00:00:00
Title: Case T-112/01: Action brought on 22 May 2001 by Ursula Klug against the Council of the European Union

C 275/10                EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                      29.9.2001
                                                          COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                 Action brought on 22 May 2001 by Ursula Klug against
                                                                                         the Council of the European Union
                                                                                                    (Case T-112/01)
                           of 7 June 2001
                                                                                                    (2001/C 275/22)
                                                                                              (Language of the case: French)
in Case T-202/00: Mario Costacurta v Commission of the
                    European Communities (1)
                                                                           An action against the Council of the European Union was
                                                                           brought before the Court of First Instance of the European
                                                                           Communities on 22 May 2001 by Ursula Klug, residing in
(Officials — Re-assignment of the applicant to a third                     Brussels, represented by Jean-Noël Louis and Véronique Peere,
country in 1993 — Reintegration of the official in the                     avocats, with an address for service in Luxembourg.
Publications Office in 1996 — Loss of entitlement to the
derogating provisions of Annex X to the Staff Regulations                  The applicant claims that the Court should:
— Request to be reassigned to a third State submitted in
2000 on the basis of Annex X — Manifest inadmissibility                    —     annul the decision definitively establishing her staff report
   of the action directed against the Commission’s replies)                      for the period 1997-1999;
                                                                           —     order the defendant to pay the costs.
                          (2001/C 275/21)
                                                                           Pleas in law and main arguments
                                                                           The applicant in the present case contests certain assessments
                     (Language of the case: French)
                                                                           contained in her staff report for the period 1997-1999.
                                                                           In support of her claim, she pleads:
In Case T-202/00: Mario Costacurta, an official of the Com-
mission of the European Communities, residing in Luxem-                    —     breach of the staff report procedure as laid down in the
bourg, represented by M. Petit, lawyer, with an address for                      guidelines for staff reports published on 28 July 1989;
service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European
                                                                           —     a manifest error in the present case, resulting from
Communities (Agents: G. Valsesia and J. Currall) — application
for annulment directed, first, against the measure contained in                  confusion between sick leave and absenteeism, as regards
                                                                                 the assessments appearing under the heading ‘Consistency
one of the letters from the Director of the Publications Office
                                                                                 of performance’.
sent to the applicant in reply to his request to be reassigned to
a third State, dated 6 June 2000, and, secondly, against the
implied rejection of the applicant’s complaint of 21 July 2000
— the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of
A.W.H. Meij, President, A. Potocki and J. Pirrung, Judges;
H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 7 June 2001, the
operative part of which is as follows:                                     Action brought on 18 June 2001 by Giorgio Fedon & Figli
                                                                           S.p.A, Fedon S.r.l. and Fedon America USA Inc. against
                                                                           the Commission of the European Communities and the
                                                                                           Council of the European Union
1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
                                                                                                    (Case T-135/01)
2.    The applicant shall bear all the costs, including those relating                              (2001/C 275/23)
      to the interlocutory proceedings.
                                                                                              (Language of the case: Italian)
                                                                           An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
(1) OJ 2000 C 285.
                                                                           ties and the Council of the European Union was brought
                                                                           before the Court of First Instance of the European Communities
                                                                           on 18 June 2001 by Giorgio Fedon & Figli S.p.A, Fedon S.r.l.
                                                                           and Fedon America USA Inc., represented by I. van Bael,
                                                                           A. Cevese and F. Di Gianni, Avvocati.