CELEX: 62017TA0093
Language: en
Date: 2018-09-18 00:00:00
Title: Case T-93/17: Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — Duferco Long Products v Commission (State aid — Steel sector — Aid granted by Belgium in favour of a number of undertakings in the steel sector — Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Duty to state reasons — Notion of State aid — Advantage — Private investor test)

29.10.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 392/25
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — Duferco Long Products v Commission
      (Case T-93/17) (1)
      
      ((State aid - Steel sector - Aid granted by Belgium in favour of a number of undertakings in the steel sector - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Duty to state reasons - Notion of State aid - Advantage - Private investor test))
      (2018/C 392/30)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Duferco Long Products SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J.-F. Bellis, R. Luff and M. Favart, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, V. Bottka and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment in part of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2041 of 20 January 2016 on State aid SA.33926 2013/C (ex 2013/NN, 2011/CP) implemented by Belgium in favour of Duferco (OJ 2016, L 314, p. 22).
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders Duferco Long Products SA to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.