CELEX: 62017TB0356
Language: en
Date: 2018-11-22 00:00:00
Title: Case T-356/17: Order of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing (RoB) (EU trade mark — Cancellation proceedings — Word mark RoB — Declaration of invalidity — Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Rule 62(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 58(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/625) — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

4.2.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 44/61
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Daico International v EUIPO — American Franchise Marketing (RoB)
      (Case T-356/17) (1)
      
      ((EU trade mark - Cancellation proceedings - Word mark RoB - Declaration of invalidity - Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Rule 62(3) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 58(3) of Regulation (EU) 2018/625) - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))
      (2019/C 44/79)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Daico International BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Kassner, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: American Franchise Marketing Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2017 (Case R 1407/2016-2), relating to cancellation proceedings between American Franchise Marketing and Daico International.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The action is dismissed.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Daico International BV shall pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 239, 24.7.2017.