CELEX: 62008TN0534
Language: en
Date: 2008-12-01 00:00:00
Title: Case T-534/08: Action brought on 1 December 2008 — Granuband v OHIM — Granuflex (GRANUflex)

21.2.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 44/55
            
         Action brought on 1 December 2008 — Granuband v OHIM — Granuflex (GRANUflex)
   (Case T-534/08)
   (2009/C 44/96)
   Language in which the application was lodged: Dutch
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Granuband BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Ellens, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Granuflex Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft (Budapest, Hungary)
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul, or at least review, the decision of OHIM of 15 September 2008, served on 24 September 2008, on grounds of infringement of the provisions of Article 52(1), in conjunction with Article 8(4), of Regulation No 40/94, and
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   
      Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: the figurative mark GRANUFLEX for goods in Classes 17, 19 and 27 — Community Trade Mark No 943118
   
      Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Granuband BV
   
      Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: Granuflex Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft.
   
      Trade-mark right of applicant for the declaration of invalidity: commercial designation GRANUFLEX for goods and services in Classes 17, 19, 27 and 37
   
      Decision of the Cancellation Division: declaration that the Community trade mark is invalid
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal brought by the applicant
   
      Pleas in law: breach of Articles 52(1)(c) and 8(4) of Regulation No 40/94.