CELEX: 62017CA0001
Language: en
Date: 2018-06-21 00:00:00
Title: Case C-1/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Torino — Italy) — Petronas Lubricants Italy SpA v Livio Guida (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment — Article 20(2) — Employer sued before the courts of the Member State in which it is domiciled — Counter-claim by the employer — Determination of the court with jurisdiction)

201807270632024682018/C 285/0912017CJC28520180813EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL201806218811Case C-1/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Torino — Italy) — Petronas Lubricants Italy SpA v Livio Guida (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment — Article 20(2) — Employer sued before the courts of the Member State in which it is domiciled — Counter-claim by the employer — Determination of the court with jurisdiction)
 ---documentbreak--- C2852018EN810120180621EN00098181Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 21 June 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d’appello di Torino — Italy) — Petronas Lubricants Italy SpA v Livio Guida
   (Case C-1/17) (
         1
      )
   ‛(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Jurisdiction over individual contracts of employment — Article 20(2) — Employer sued before the courts of the Member State in which it is domiciled — Counter-claim by the employer — Determination of the court with jurisdiction)’2018/C 285/09Language of the case: Italian
      Referring court
   
   Corte d’appello di Torino
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Petronas Lubricants Italy SpA
   
      Defendant: Livio Guida
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Article 20(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, it gives an employer the right to bring, before the court properly seised of the original proceedings brought by an employee, a counter-claim based on a claim-assignment agreement concluded, after the introduction of the original proceedings, between the employer and the original holder of that claim.
   (
         1
      )	OJ C 112, 10.4.2017.