CELEX: 52010PC0332
Language: en
Date: 2010-06-24
Title: Proposal for a Decision of the Council and the representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council on the conclusion of the Euro Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part

|

52010PC0332

 Proposal for a Decision of the Council and the representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the Council on the conclusion of the Euro Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part  /* COM/2010/0332 final - NLE 2010/0180 */  

	[pic] | EUROPEAN COMMISSION |Brussels, 24.6.2010COM(2010)332 final2010/0180 (NLE)Proposal for aDecision of the Council and the representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the CouncilOn the conclusion of the Euro Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other partEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM1. Context of the proposal |Grounds for and objectives of the proposal The Euro Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part has been negotiated under a mandate received from the Council in June 2007. Air services between the European Union and Jordan presently operate on the basis of bilateral agreements between individual Member States and Jordan. It is part of the EU neighbourhood policy to replace this network of bilateral agreements through the establishment of a Euro Mediterranean Aviation Area between the EU and its Mediterranean Partners. The Agreement aims at: - gradual market opening in terms of access to routes and capacity on a reciprocal basis; - non-discrimination and level playing field for economic operators based on the principles of the EU Treaties; - Alignment of the Jordanian aviation legislation with EU legislation on issues such as safety, security and air traffic management. The Agreement mentions the possibility to extend the Agreement in order to create with all the other Mediterranean Partners a Common Euro Mediterranean Aviation Area. |General context The negotiating mandate set the objective of establishing a Euro Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the EU and Jordan. This would extend the rules and provisions of the single market for air transport in the EU to a large extent to Jordan in which European and Jordanian air carriers would be able to provide air services without any restriction. Based on the negotiating directives of the mandate, a draft Agreement with Jordan was initialled by the two sides on 17 March 2010. |Existing provisions in the area of the proposal The provisions of the Agreement supersede the existing bilateral air services agreements between Member States and Jordan. |Consistency with the other policies and objectives of the Union The conclusion of an Euro Mediterranean Aviation Agreement with Jordan has been a priority for the EU and is an important element in the development of the European Neighbourhood Policy, as identified in Commission Communication COM(2005) 79 final "Developing the agenda for the Community's external aviation policy" and the Communication COM (2008) 596 final "Common Aviation Area with the Neighbouring Countries by 2010 – Progress report" . |2. Consultation of interested parties and impact assessment |Consultation of interested parties |Consultation methods, main sectors targeted and general profile of respondents Throughout the negotiating process, the Commission has consulted with stakeholders, in particular via regular meetings of the Special Committee and the Consultative Forum comprising representatives of air carriers, airports, and labour organisations. |Summary of responses and how they have been taken into account All comments from stakeholders were duly taken into consideration in the preparation of the Union's negotiating position. |Collection and use of expertise |There was no need for external expertise. |Impact assessment The Agreement ensures the gradual establishment of a Euro Mediterranean Aviation Area with Jordan. A report prepared for the Commission in 2008 by consultants, estimated that an Euro Mediterranean Aviation Agreement with Jordan would generate 54,000 extra passengers and consumer benefits of up to 30 million € in the first effective year of market opening. The report has been made available to Member States and stakeholders via the CIRCA database. The Agreement establishes a Joint Committee which will be responsible for reviewing the implementation of the Agreement and its effects. |3. Legal elements of the proposal |Summary of the proposed action The Agreement consists of the main body including the main principles, and three annexes: Annex 1 on traffic rights, Annex 2 on transitional provisions and Annex 3 including the EU aviation legislation to be taken over by Jordan. |Legal basis Article 207 (5), in conjunction with Article 218 paragraphs (2), (5), (6) and (7) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union |Subsidiarity principle The subsidiarity principle applies insofar as the proposal does not fall under the exclusive competence of the Union. |The objectives of the proposal cannot be sufficiently achieved by the Member States for the following reason(s). |By establishing a Euro Mediterranean Aviation Area, the Agreement will extend EU legislation in the field of aviation to Jordan. In particular, Jordan will take over EU legislation in important fields such as safety, security and air traffic management. The Agreement will replace the existing arrangements made by individual Member States. The Agreement creates simultaneously for all Union air carriers uniform conditions for market access, and establishes new arrangements for regulatory co-operation between the European Union and Jordan in fields essential for the safe, secure, and efficient operation of air services. These arrangements can only be achieved at Union level because they involve a number of areas of exclusive Union competence. |Union action will better achieve the objectives of the proposal for the following reason(s). |The Agreement allows for the simultaneous extension of its terms to the 27 Member States, applying the same rules without discrimination and benefiting all Union air carriers regardless of their nationality. These carriers can now operate freely from any point in the European Union to any point in Jordan which is currently not the case. |Removal of all market access restrictions between the EU and Jordan will not only attract new entrants to the market and create opportunities to operate to underserved airports, but will also facilitate consolidation between EU air carriers. |The Agreement secures for all EU air carriers access to commercial opportunities, such as the possibility to freely establish prices. One further objective of the mandate is to create a level playing field between all EU and Jordanian air carriers, and this requires strong regulatory co-operation which can only be delivered at Union level. |The proposal therefore complies with the subsidiarity principle. |Proportionality principle The proposal complies with the proportionality principle for the following reason(s). |A Joint Committee will be established to discuss matters related to the implementation of the Agreement. The Joint Committee will foster expert-level exchanges on new legislative or regulatory initiatives or developments and consider potential areas for further development of the Agreement. The Joint Committee will be composed of representatives of the Commission and the Member States. |Furthermore, Member States will continue to carry out the traditional administrative tasks they execute in the context of international air transport, but under common rules applied uniformly. |Choice of instruments |Proposed instruments: international agreement |Other means would not be adequate for the following reason(s). External aviation relations can only be given effect through international agreements. |4. Budgetary implication |The proposal has no implication for the Union budget. |2010/0180 (NLE)Proposal for aDecision of the Council and the representatives of the Governments of the Member States of the European Union, meeting within the CouncilOn the conclusion of the Euro Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, of the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other partTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE REPRESENTATIVES OF THE GOVERNMENTS OF THE MEMBER STATES MEETING WITHIN THE COUNCILHaving regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and in particular Article 207 (5), in conjunction with Article 218 paragraphs (2), (5) and (7), as well Article 218 (6) (a) (v) thereofHaving obtained the consent of … of the European ParliamentWhereas:(1) the Commission has negotiated on behalf of the Union and of the Member States an Agreement on Air Transport with the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan (hereinafter, the “Agreement”);(2) the Agreement was signed on ….;(3) the Agreement should be approved by the Union and the Member States;(4) it is necessary to lay down procedural arrangements for deciding, if appropriate, how to terminate the Agreement. It is also necessary to lay down appropriate procedural arrangements for the participation of the Union and the Member States in the Joint Committee set up under Article 21 of the Agreement and in the dispute settlement procedures provided in Article 22 of the Agreement, as well as for implementing certain provisions of the Agreement concerning security and safety.HAVE DECIDED AS FOLLOWS:Article 1 (Approval)1. The Euro Mediterranean Aviation Agreement between the European Union and its Member States, on the one part, and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, of the other part, is hereby approved on behalf of the Union. The text of the Agreement is attached to this decision.2. Upon completion of its internal procedures for entry into force of the Agreement, each Member State shall transmit to the Secretariat of the Council the diplomatic note provided for in Article 29 (1) of the Agreement.3. The President of the Council is hereby authorised to designate the person empowered to deliver to Jordan the diplomatic notes provided in Article 29 (1) of the Agreement on behalf of the Union and of the Member States.Article 2 (Termination)A decision to terminate the Agreement and give notice thereof to Jordan in accordance with Article 27 of the Agreement, and a decision to withdraw such notice, shall be taken by the Council, on behalf of the Union and of the Member States, acting unanimously on the basis of a Commission proposal.Article 3 (Joint Committee)1. The European Union and the Member States will be represented in the Joint Committee established under Article 21 of the Agreement by representatives of the European Commission and the Member States.2. The position to be taken by the European Union and its Member States within the Joint Committee with respect to matters of exclusive competence of the EU that do not require the adoption of a decision having legal effect will be established by the European Commission and will be notified in advance to the Council and the Member States.3. For Joint Committee decisions concerning matters that fall within the competence of the EU, the position to be taken by the European Union and its Member States will be adopted by the Council, acting by qualified majority on a proposal from the European Commission, unless the applicable voting procedures set down in the EU Treaties provide otherwise.4. For Joint Committee decisions concerning matters that fall within Member States' competence, the position to be taken by the European Union and its Member States will be adopted by the Council, acting by unanimity, on a proposal from the European Commission or from Member States, unless a Member State has informed the General Secretariat of the Council within one month of the adoption of that position that it can only consent to the decision to be taken by the Joint Committee with the agreement of its legislative bodies.Article 4 (Settlement of Disputes)1. The Commission shall represent the Union and the Member States in dispute settlement proceedings under Article 22 of the Agreement.2. The decision to suspend the application of benefits pursuant to Article 22 (7) of the Agreement shall be taken by the Council on the basis of a Commission proposal. The Council shall decide by qualified majority.3. Any other appropriate action to be taken under Article 22 of the Agreement on matters which fall within the Union competence shall be decided upon by the Commission, with the assistance of a Special Committee of representatives of the Member States appointed by the Council.Article 5 (Information to the Commission)1. Member States shall inform in advance the Commission of any decision to refuse, revoke, suspend or limit the authorisation of an air carrier that they intend to adopt under Articles 3 and 4 of the Agreement.2. Member States shall inform the Commission immediately of any requests or notifications made or received by them under Article 13 (Aviation safety) of the Agreement.3. Member States shall inform the Commission immediately of any requests or notifications made or received by them under Article 14 (Aviation security) of the Agreement.Done at Brussels, […]For the CouncilThe President[…]