CELEX: 62019TB0209
Language: en
Date: 2019-09-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-209/19: Order of the General Court of 5 September 2019 — Giorgio Armani v EUIPO — Invicta Watch Company of America (GLYCINE) (European Union trade mark – Opposition proceedings – Withdrawal of the application for registration – No need to adjudicate)

28.10.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 363/16
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 5 September 2019 — Giorgio Armani v EUIPO — Invicta Watch Company of America (GLYCINE)
      (Case T-209/19) (1)
      
      (European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the application for registration - No need to adjudicate)
      (2019/C 363/23)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Giorgio Armani SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: J. Rether and M. Kinkeldey, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, Agent)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Invicta Watch Company of America, Inc. (Hollywood, Florida, United States)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 February 2019 (Case R 578/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Giorgio Armani and Invicta Watch Company of America, Inc.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     Giorgio Armani SpA shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 182, 27.5.2019.