CELEX: 62010TN0210
Language: en
Date: 2010-05-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-210/10: Action brought on 5 May 2010 — Condé v Council

28.8.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 234/39
            
         Action brought on 5 May 2010 — Condé v Council
   (Case T-210/10)
   ()
   2010/C 234/72
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Mamoudou Condé (represented by: J.-C. Tchikaya, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               Annul Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea, in so far as it concerns the applicant;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the Council to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The applicant seeks annulment of Council Regulation (EU) No 1284/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing certain specific restrictive measures in respect of the Republic of Guinea (1) in so far as the applicant is included on the list of natural or legal persons, entities or bodies whose funds and economic resources are frozen under Article 6 of that regulation.
   In support of his action, the applicant raises three pleas in law alleging:
   
               —
            
            
               an infringement of the right to an effective judicial remedy since he was not informed of the rights of appeal available to him;
            
         
               —
            
            
               an infringement of his rights of defence since he was not informed of the evidence against him;
            
         
               —
            
            
               an infringement of the principle of proportionality and of his right to property.
            
         
      (1)  OJ 2009 L 346, p. 26.