CELEX: 62010TA0233
Language: en
Date: 2012-05-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-233/10: Judgment of the General Court of 25 May 2012 — Nike International v OHIM — Intermar Simanto Nahmias (JUMPMAN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark JUMPMAN — Earlier national word mark JUMP — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

7.7.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 200/12
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 25 May 2012 — Nike International v OHIM — Intermar Simanto Nahmias (JUMPMAN)
   (Case T-233/10) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark JUMPMAN - Earlier national word mark JUMP - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2012/C 200/23
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Nike International Ltd (Beaverton, Oregon, United States) (represented by: M. de Justo Bailey, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Intermar Simanto Nahmias (Çatalca-Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: J. Güell Serra and M. Curell Aguilà, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 March 2010 (Case R 738/2009-1), concerning opposition proceedings between Intermar Simanto Nahmias and Nike International Ltd.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Nike International Ltd to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.