CELEX: 62014TN0569
Language: en
Date: 2014-07-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-569/14: Action brought on 30 July 2014  — Laverana v OHIM (BIO COMPLEXE DE PLANTES ENRICHI EN PROTÉINES PROPRE FABRICATION)

13.10.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 361/12
            
         Action brought on 30 July 2014 — Laverana v OHIM (BIO COMPLEXE DE PLANTES ENRICHI EN PROTÉINES PROPRE FABRICATION)
   (Case T-569/14)
   2014/C 361/16
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Laverana GmbH & Co. KG (Wennigsen, Germany) (represented by J. Wachinger, M. Zöbisch and D. Chatterjee, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 May 2014 in case R 122/2014-4;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay the costs
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark which contains the word elements ‘BIO COMPLEXE DE PLANTES ENRICHI EN PROTÉINES PROPRE FABRICATION’ for goods and services in Classes 3, 5 and 35 — Community trade mark application No 1 1 9 22  961
   
      Decision of the Examiner: Refused the application
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law:
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Misuse of powers by a decision on the basis of competition policy considerations