CELEX: C2007/069/40
Language: en
Date: 2007-03-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-166/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 31 January 2007 — C v Commission (Officials — Enforcement of a judgment of the Court of First Instance — Action for annulment — No need to adjudicate — Action for damages — Breach of administrative duty — Loss of opportunity)

24.3.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 69/17
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 31 January 2007 — C v Commission
   (Case T-166/04) (1)
   
   (Officials - Enforcement of a judgment of the Court of First Instance - Action for annulment - No need to adjudicate - Action for damages - Breach of administrative duty - Loss of opportunity)
   (2007/C 69/40)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicant: C (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J. Sambon, P.-P. Van Gehuchten and P. Reyniers, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and L. Lozano Palacios, Agents)
   Re:
   Firstly, application for annulment of the implied decision to reject the applicant's application for enforcement of the judgment delivered by the Court of First Instance on [confidential] (2) in Case [confidential] and, in so far as necessary, the decision to reject the applicant's complaint of 12 February 2004 and, secondly, application for compensation for material and non-material damage allegedly suffered.
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Declares that there is no need to adjudicate on the claim for annulment.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the Commission to pay the applicant, Mr C, the sum of EUR 15 000.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the Commission to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 179, 10.7.2004.
   
      (2)  Confidential information omitted.