CELEX: 62013TA0662
Language: en
Date: 2015-06-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-662/13: Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2015 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — Diseños Mireia (M) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark M — Earlier Community word mark dm — Relative ground for refusal — No similarity between the signs — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

10.8.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 262/22
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 25 June 2015 — dm-drogerie markt v OHIM — Diseños Mireia (M)
   (Case T-662/13) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark M - Earlier Community word mark dm - Relative ground for refusal - No similarity between the signs - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   (2015/C 262/29)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG (Karlsruhe, Germany) (represented by: O. Bludovsky and C. Mellein, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Diseños Mireia, SL (Barcelona, Spain)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2013 (Case R 911/2012-1), relating to opposition proceedings between dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG and Diseños Mireia, SL.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1)
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2)
            
            
               Orders dm-drogerie markt GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 61, 1.3.2014.