CELEX: 62012TN0330
Language: en
Date: 2012-07-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-330/12: Action brought on 19 July 2012 — Hut.com v OHIM — Intersport France (THE HUT)

29.9.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 295/27
            
         Action brought on 19 July 2012 — Hut.com v OHIM — Intersport France (THE HUT)
   (Case T-330/12)
   2012/C 295/48
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: The Hut.com Ltd (Northwich, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Intersport France (Longjumeau, France)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 April 2012 in case R 814/2011-2; and
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant and the other party before the Board of Appeal to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘THE HUT’, for inter alias services in class 35 — Community trade mark application No 8394091
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: French trade mark registration No 33228708 of the word mark ‘LA HUTTE’, for goods in classes 3, 5, 18, 22, 25 and 28
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially annulled the contested decision
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation No 207/2009