CELEX: C2006/060/33
Language: en
Date: 2006-03-11 00:00:00
Title: Case C-430/05: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias by order of that court of  31 August 2005  in Dionik Anonimi Etairia Emporias I/I, Logismikou & Parokhis Ipirision Mikhanografisis (Dionik A.E.) and Ioannis Mikhail Pikoulas v Epitropi Kefalaiagoras

11.3.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 60/16
            
         Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Simvoulio tis Epikratias by order of that court of 31 August 2005 in Dionik Anonimi Etairia Emporias I/I, Logismikou & Parokhis Ipirision Mikhanografisis (Dionik A.E.) and Ioannis Mikhail Pikoulas v Epitropi Kefalaiagoras
   (Case C-430/05)
   (2006/C 60/33)
   Language of the case: Greek
   Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the European Communities by order of the Simvoulio tis Epikratias (Council of State, Greece) of 31 August 2005, received at the Court Registry on 2 December 2005, for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings between Dionik Anonimi Etairia Emporias I/I, Logismikou & Parokhis Ipirision Mikhanografisis (Dionik A.E.) and Ioannis Mikhail Pikoulas and the Epitropi Kefalaiagoras (Capital Market Commission) on the following question:
   In the light of Article 21 of Directive 2001/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the admission of securities to official stock exchange listing and on information to be published on those securities (OJ 2001 L 184, p. 1), can a national legislature lay down, for cases where the information recorded in listing particulars proves to be inaccurate or misleading, administrative penalties imposable not only upon the persons expressly mentioned in those particulars as responsible but also upon the issuer of the securities being admitted to listing on a stock exchange and, indiscriminately, upon the members of its board of directors, regardless of whether the board members have been identified as responsible in the abovementioned sense?