CELEX: C2002/044/01
Language: en
Date: 2002-02-16 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 13 December 2001 in Case C-317/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the College van Beroep voor het bedrĳfsleven): Kloosterboer Rotterdam BV v Minister van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserĳ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional duties on importation — Validity of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1484/95)

16.2.2002               EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                                 C 44/1
                                                                         I
                                                                   (Information)
                                                     COURT OF JUSTICE
                                                               COURT OF JUSTICE
                 JUDGMENT OF THE COURT                                       trator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 13 December
                                                                             2001, in which it has ruled:
                         (Sixth Chamber)
                                                                             Paragraphs (1) and (3) of Article 3 of Regulation (EC) No 1484/95
                                                                             of 28 June 1995 laying down detailed rules for implementing the
                      of 13 December 2001                                    system of additional import duties and fixing additional import
                                                                             duties in the poultrymeat and egg sectors and for egg albumin, and
in Case C-317/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling                         repealing Regulation No 163/67/EC, are invalid, inasmuch as they
from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven):                         provide that the additional duty referred to therein is, as a general
Kloosterboer Rotterdam BV v Minister van Landbouw,                           rule, established on the basis of the representative price laid down in
                  Natuurbeheer en Visserij (1)                               Article 2(1) of Regulation No 1484/95 and that the duty is
                                                                             established on the basis of the cif import price of the shipment
                                                                             concerned only if the importer so requests.
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Additional duties on
importation — Validity of Article 3 of Regulation (EC)
                            No 1484/95)                                      (1) OJ C 352 of 4.12.1999.
                          (2002/C 44/01)
                    (Language of the case: Dutch)                                              JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published                              of 13 December 2001
                   in the European Court Reports)
                                                                             in Case C-324/99 (Reference for a preliminary ruling from
                                                                             the Bundesverwaltungsgericht): DaimlerChrysler AG v
                                                                                                Land Baden-Württemberg (1)
In Case C-317/99: reference to the Court under Article 234
EC from the College van Beroep voor het bedrijfsleven                        (Environment — Waste — Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 on
(Administrative Court for Trade and Industry) (Netherlands)                  shipments of waste — Conditions justifying prohibitions or
for a preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that              restrictions on the export of waste — National legislation
court between Kloosterboer Rotterdam BV and Minister van                     imposing the obligation to offer waste to an approved body)
Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij — on the validity of
Article 3(1) and (3) of Commission Regulation (EC)                                                      (2002/C 44/02)
No 1484/95 of 28 June 1995 laying down detailed rules for
implementing the system of additional import duties and                                          (Language of the case: German)
fixing additional import duties in the poultrymeat and egg
sectors and for egg albumin, and repealing Regulation                        (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
No 163/67/EEC (OJ 1995 L 145, p. 47) and on the interpret-                                       in the European Court Reports)
ation of that provision and of Articles 65 and 220(2)(b) of
Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992
establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302,                      In Case C-324/99: reference to the Court under Article 234 EC
p. 1) — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: N. Colneric,                 by the Bundesverwaltungsgericht (Germany) for a preliminary
President of the Second Chamber, acting for the President of                 ruling in the proceedings pending before that court between
the Sixth Chamber, C. Gulmann, R. Schintgen, V. Skouris                      DaimlerChrysler AG and Land Baden-Württemberg, on the
(Rapporteur) and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo                interpretation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 259/93 of
Colomer, Advocate General; H.A. Rühl, Principal Adminis-                     1 February 1993 on the supervision and control of shipments