CELEX: 62015TN0567
Language: en
Date: 2015-09-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-567/15: Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Monster Energy v OHIM — Mad Catz Interactive (Representation of a black square with four white stripes)

16.11.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 381/55
            
         Action brought on 25 September 2015 — Monster Energy v OHIM — Mad Catz Interactive (Representation of a black square with four white stripes)
   (Case T-567/15)
   (2015/C 381/65)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Monster Energy Company (Corona, United States) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mad Catz Interactive, Inc. (San Diego, United States)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark (representation of a black square with four white stripes) — Application for registration No 11 390 853
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 July 2015 in Case R 2368/2014-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the Board of Appeal of 4 May 2015 in Case R 2368/2014-5;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 1 July 2015 in opposition No B2182320;
            
         
               —
            
            
               reject the opposed mark in respect of class 25;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the opponent.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(5) Regulation No 207/2009.