CELEX: 62015TN0509
Language: en
Date: 2015-09-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-509/15: Action brought on 3 September 2015 — Kessel medintim v OHIM — Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Premeno)

26.10.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 354/45
            
         Action brought on 3 September 2015 — Kessel medintim v OHIM — Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Premeno)
   (Case T-509/15)
   (2015/C 354/55)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Kessel medintim GmbH (Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Jacob and U. Staudenmaier, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Neuss, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Premeno’ — Application No 6 408 926
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 July 2015 in Case R 349/2015-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision and dismiss the opposition;
            
         
               —
            
            
               in the alternative: refer the opposition back to OHIM for a new decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the cost of the proceedings in accordance with Article 134(1) TFEU.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 75(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.