CELEX: 62018TB0662
Language: en
Date: 2019-07-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-662/18: Order of the General Court of 4 July 2019 — romwell v EUIPO (twistpac) (EU trade mark — Application for EU word mark twistpac — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Lack of distinctive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 — Duty of care — Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

30.9.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 328/55
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 4 July 2019 — romwell v EUIPO (twistpac)
      (Case T-662/18) (1)
      
      (EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark twistpac - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Duty of care - Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
      (2019/C 328/62)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: romwell GmbH & Co. KG (Breitscheidt, Germany) (represented by: C. Spintig, S. Pietzcker and M. Prasse, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, acting as Agent)
      
         Re:
      
      Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 August 2018 (Case R 336/2018-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign twistpac as an EU trade mark.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  
                     The action is dismissed.
                  
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  
                     romwell GmbH & Co. KG is ordered to pay the costs.
                  
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 4, 7.1.2019.