CELEX: 62014TN0382
Language: en
Date: 2014-05-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-382/14: Action brought on 19 May 2014 — Rintisch v OHIM — Compagnie laitière européenne (PROTICURD)

25.8.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 282/39
            
         Action brought on 19 May 2014 — Rintisch v OHIM — Compagnie laitière européenne (PROTICURD)
   (Case T-382/14)
   2014/C 282/51
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Bernhard Rintisch (Bottrop, Germany) (represented by: A. Dreyer, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Compagnie laitière européenne SA (Conde Sur Vire, France)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 14 March 2014 given in Case R 609/2011-4;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘PROTICURD’ for goods in Classes 5 and 29 — International Registration No 9 81  041 designating the European Union
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: German trademarks Nos 3 9 7 02  429, 3 9 5 49  559 and 3 9 6 08  644
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Upheld the opposition in part
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Granted the appeal in part
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1)(b) CTMR.