CELEX: C2003/171/44
Language: en
Date: 2003-07-19 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 31 March 2003 in Case T-226/02: André Hecq v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Action for annulment — Act adversely affecting an official — Inadmissibility)

C 171/26                 EN                           Official Journal of the European Union                                              19.7.2003
Stahlhandel GmbH & Co. KG, established in Essen (Germany),                    repealing Commission Directive 91/357/EEC (OJ 2002 L 63,
and Metal Traders Stahlhandel GmbH, established in Düssel-                    p. 23) and a claim for compensation for the damage allegedly
dorf (Germany) represented by K. Friedrich, lawyer, with an                   suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber),
address for service in Luxembourg, against the Commission of                  composed of V. Tiili, President of the Chamber, P. Mengozzi
the European Communities (Agents: J. Forman and R. Raith) —                   and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on
application, first, for the annulment of Commission Regulation                21 March 2003, the operative part of which is as follows:
(EC) No 560/2002 of 27 March 2002 imposing provisional
safeguard measures against imports of certain steel products
(OJ 2002 L 85, p. 1) and, second, a claim for damages —                       1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible so far as it concerns
the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of                            the annulment of Directive 2002/2/EC of the European
B. Vesterdorf, President R.M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,                             Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 27 March 2003,                         Council Directive 79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound
the operative part of which is as follows:                                          feedingstuffs and repealing Commission Directive 91/357/
                                                                                    EEC.
1.     There is no need to give a decision on the claim for annulment.
                                                                              2.    The requests submitted by the defendants that the action, in so
2.     The application for a ruling on the admissibility of the claim               far as it seeks compensation for the damage allegedly suffered,
       for damages is joined to the application on the substance.                   should be held inadmissible, are reserved for final judgment.
3.     The costs are reserved.                                                3.    Costs are reserved.
( 1) OJ C 191 of 10.8.02.
                                                                              (1 ) OJ 2002 C 180.
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                          of 21 March 2003
                                                                                     ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
in Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge v European
      Parliament and Council of the European Union ( 1)                                                 of 31 March 2003
(Actions for annulment — Natural or legal persons —
Measures of direct and individual concern to them —                           in Case T-226/02: André Hecq v Commission of the
Directive 2002/2/EC — Inadmissibility — Claim for dam-                                            European Communities (1)
                                  ages)
                                                                              (Officials — Action for annulment — Act adversely affect-
                           (2003/C 171/43)                                                     ing an official — Inadmissibility)
                     (Language of the case: French)
                                                                                                         (2003/C 171/44)
                                                                                                   (Language of the case: French)
In Case T-167/02: Établissements Toulorge, established in
Bricquebec (France), represented by D. Waelbroeck and
D. Brinckman, lawyers, against European Parliament (Agents:
C. Pennera and Mme E. Waldherr) and Council of the European
Union (Agents: I. Diez Parra and F. P. Ruggeri Laderchi),
supported by Federal Republic of Germany (Agents: W.-                         In Case T-226/02: André Hecq, an official of the Commission
D. Plessing nad M. Lumma) and Commission of the European                      of the European Communities, residing in Mondercange
Communities (Agent: A. Bordes) — application for the annul-                   (Luxembourg), represented by L. Vogel and D. Amatulli,
ment of Directive 2002/2/EC of the European Parliament and                    lawyers, against the Commission of the European Communi-
of the Council of 28 January 2002 amending Council Directive                  ties (Agent: M. Currall) — application for the annulment of the
79/373/EEC on the circulation of compound feedingstuffs and                   Commission decision of 15 June 2001 approving the
 ---pagebreak--- 19.7.2003                EN                         Official Journal of the European Union                                             C 171/27
agreement between Vice-President Kinnock and the trade                      1.    The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
unions and staff associations of the Commission concerning
the resources available to staff representatives and the rules on           2.    Each party shall pay its own costs.
the resources available to staff representatives from 1 January
2002 — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed
of B. Vesterdorf, President, R. M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal,                (1 ) OJ C 247 of 12.10.02.
Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on 31 March 2003,
the operative part of which is as follows:
1.     The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
2.     Each party shall pay its own costs.
                                                                                   ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
( 1) OJ C 247 of 12.10.02.                                                                            of 3 April 2003
                                                                            in Case T-258/02: Hendrikus Boukes v European Parlia-
                                                                                                           ment ( 1)
                                                                            (Officials — Action for annulment — Action now devoid of
                                                                                          purpose — No need to give a decision)
                                                                                                      (2003/C 171/46)
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                                (Language of the case: French)
                          of 31 March 2003
in Case T-227/02: André Hecq v Commission of the                            In Case T-258/02: Hendrikus Boukes, a former official of the
                    European Communities ( 1)                               European Parliament, residing in Waldbredimus (Luxem-
                                                                            bourg), represented by E. Boigelot, lawyer, with an address for
                                                                            service in Luxembourg, against the European Parliament
   (Action for annulment — Time-limits — Inadmissibility)                   (Agents: H. von Hertzen and L. G. Knudsen) — application for
                                                                            annulment of the decision of the Secretary-General of the
                                                                            European Parliament of 4 January 2002 refusing to treat his
                           (2003/C 171/45)                                  marriage to a person of the same sex, contracted under the
                                                                            Netherlands Law of 21 December 2000, as falling within the
                                                                            definition of marriage for the purpose of the Staff Regulations
                                                                            and to grant him all the rights, privileges and immunities
                     (Language of the case: French)
                                                                            arising from the applicable Community provisions — the
                                                                            Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of V. Tiili,
                                                                            President, P. Mengozzi and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung,
                                                                            Registrar, made an order on 3 April 2003, the operative part
                                                                            of which is as follows:
In Case T-227/02: André Hecq, Secretary-General and rep-
resentative of the Syndicat des Fonctionnaires Internationaux
et Européens (SFIE), residing in Mondercange (Luxembourg),                  1)    There is no longer any need to give a decision on the present
represented by L. Vogel and D. Amatulli, lawyers, against the                     action.
Commission of the European Communities (Agent: J. Currall)
— application for the annulment of the Commission decision                  2)    There is no need to give a decision on the Kingdom of the
of 15 June 2001, approving the agreement between Vice                             Netherlands’ application to intervene.
President Kinnock and the trade unions and staff associations
of the Commission concerning the resources available to staff               3)    The Parliament shall pay both the applicant’s and its own costs.
representatives and the rules on the resources available to staff
representatives from 1 January 2002 — the Court of First
Instance (First Chamber), composed of B. Vesterdorf, President              (1 ) OJ C 274 of 9.11.02.
and R.M. Moura Ramos and H. Legal, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar,
made an order on 31 March 2003, the operative part of which
is as follows: