CELEX: 52010PC0749
Language: en
Date: 2010-12-14
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION amending Decision 2004/162/EC as regards the products that may benefit from exemption from or a reduction in dock dues

|

52010PC0749

	[pic] | EUROPEAN COMMISSION |Brussels, 14.12.2010COM(2010) 749 final2010/0359 (CNS)Proposal for aCOUNCIL DECISIONamending Decision 2004/162/EC as regards the products that may benefit from exemption from or a reduction in dock duesEXPLANATORY MEMORANDUMCONTEXT OF THE PROPOSALThe Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which applies to the outermost regions of the EU, which include the four French overseas departments (DOMs), does not in principle allow any difference in the DOMs between the taxation of local products and the taxation of products from metropolitan France or the other Member States. Article 349 of the TFUE (former Article 229(2) of the EC Treaty) provides, however, for the possibility of introducing specific measures for those regions because of the permanent handicaps which affect the economic and social conditions of the outermost regions.Council Decision 2004/162/EC of 10 February 2004, adopted on the basis of Article 299(2) of the EC Treaty, authorises France, up to 1 July 2014, to apply exemptions from or reductions in the tax known as "dock dues" to certain products manufactured in the DOMs. The Annex to that Decision contains a list of products to which tax exemptions and reductions may be applied. The difference between the taxation of locally manufactured products and the taxation of other products may not exceed 10, 20 or 30 percentage points, depending on the product.Decision 2004/162/EC sets out the reasons for adopting specific measures, which include isolation, raw material and energy dependence, the obligation to build up stocks, the small size of the local market and the low level of export activity. The combination of these handicaps means that production costs, and therefore the cost price of goods produced locally, are increased, so that without specific measures they would be less competitive than goods produced elsewhere, even taking into account the cost of transporting the latter to the DOMs. This would make it harder to maintain local production. The specific measures contained in Decision 2004/162/EC were thus designed to strengthen local industry by making it more competitive.Article 4 of Decision 2004/162/EC provides that the French authorities must present to the Commission by 31 July 2008 a report on the application of the tax arrangements authorised by the Decision, in order to check the impact of the measures taken and their contribution to promoting or maintaining local economic activities, in the light of the handicaps affecting the outermost regions. On the basis of this report, the Commission must present a report to the Council giving a full economic and social analysis and, where appropriate, a proposal for adapting the provisions of Decision 2004/162/EC.On 31 July 2008 the French authorities accordingly submitted their report to the Commission. It was later supplemented. The report from the French authorities includes a request for the list of products to which differentiated taxation may be applied to be updated for French Guiana.The Commission's report has been presented to the Council today[1]. It is accompanied by this proposal for a Council Decision.RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTSThe French authorities' request concerning French Guiana was a response to requests from the economic sectors concerned. In addition, representatives of the economic sectors most affected by the French authorities' request concerning French Guiana were present in several delegations at working meetings with the French authorities.The Commission has not used an impact assessment.LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL305 | Summary of the proposed measures To update, in the light of the findings made, the lists of products in the Annex to Decision 2004/162/EC, to which France is authorised, within certain limits, to apply exemptions from or reductions in the tax known as "dock dues" for certain products manufactured locally in the French overseas departments. |310 | Legal basis Article 349 TFEU. |329 | Subsidiarity principle Only the Council is authorised, on the basis of Article 349 TFEU, to adopt specific measures in favour of the outermost regions to adjust the application of the Treaties to those regions, including the common policies, because of the permanent handicaps which affect the economic and social conditions of the outermost regions. The proposal therefore complies with the subsidiarity principle. |Proportionality principle The proposal complies with the proportionality principle for the following reasons. |331 | Its purpose is to update Decision 2004/162/EC. It concerns only products for which such an adaptation has proved necessary. |332 | Equally, the maximum differential proposed for each product covered by this proposal is limited to what is necessary in view of the higher costs affecting the local production concerned in each case. In this way, the tax burden on products imported into French overseas departments will not exceed what is necessary to offset the lower competitiveness of products manufactured locally compared with imported products. |Choice of instrument |341 | Proposed instrument: Council Decision. |342 | Other instruments would not have been appropriate for the following reasons. The text to be amended is itself a Council Decision, adopted on the same legal basis (Article 299(2) of the then EC Treaty). |BUDGETARY IMPACTThe proposal has no impact on the budget of the European Union.5. OPTIONAL ELEMENTSRecitals 4 to 15 of the proposal for a Council Decision set out the amendments which it proposes to make to the lists of products in the Annex to Decision 2004/162/EC and the reasons therefore.France will need time to adjust its domestic legislation to the removal of products from the lists in Decision 2004/162/EC. It is therefore proposed that the date of application of this amending Decision be deferred until after the date of its notification (see Article 2).2010/0359 (CNS)Proposal for aCOUNCIL DECISIONamending Decision 2004/162/EC as regards the products that may benefit from exemption from or a reduction in dock duesTHE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 349 thereof,Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national Parliaments,Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament[2],Acting in accordance with a special legislative procedure,Whereas:1.  Council Decision 2004/162/EC of 10 February 2004 concerning the dock dues in the French overseas departments and extending the period of validity of Decision 89/688/EEC[3]authorises the French authorities to apply exemptions from or reductions in the dock dues tax for the products listed in its Annex. The maximum permitted tax differential is, depending on the products and the overseas department in question, 10, 20 or 30 percentage points.2.  In accordance with the second paragraph of Article 4 of Decision 2004/162/EC, on 31 July 2008 the French authorities presented to the Commission a report on the application of the taxation arrangements provided for in that Decision. On 22 December 2008 a supplement was submitted, and the further information requested by the Commission on 15 April 2009 was sent to it on 16 April 2010. The report from the French authorities includes a request for the list of products to which differentiated taxation may be applied to be adapted for French Guiana.3.  On the basis of the report from the French authorities, the Commission presented to the Council the report[4] provided for in the third paragraph of Article 4 of Decision 2004/162/EC and a proposal for amendments to the Decision. The proposals concern either the four DOMs or French Guiana specifically.4.  It should first be noted that there is no longer any local production of certain products in the DOM concerned, and the French authorities no longer apply differentiated taxation to certain other products because those produced locally are now at a price equivalent to that of products from outside the DOM. They should therefore be removed from the lists in the Annex to Decision 2004/162/EC. This is the case in Guadeloupe for margarine (product 1517 10[5]) and for pebbles, gravel, etc. (product 2517 10). In the case of Martinique the products concerned are anti-freezing preparations and prepared de-icing liquids (product 3820), margarine (product 1517 10) and certain acids (product 2811). Lastly, the products concerned in the case of Réunion are soya-bean oil (product 1507 90), certain olive oils (product 1510 00 90), certain chemical products (products 2828 10 00 and 2828 90 00) and certain photographic materials (product 3705 10 00).5.  Secondly, the tax differential actually applied is, for a limited number of products, significantly below the maximum authorised. The maximum differential authorised for these products should therefore be reduced as there is no specific reason to believe that an increase in the existing tax differential may become necessary in the near future. For Guadeloupe, the products concerned are certain meats (product 0210), certain vegetables (products 0702, 0705, 0706 10 00, 0707 00, 0709 60 and 0709 90), certain kinds of animal feedstuffs (product 2309), certain paints (products 3208, 3209 and 3210), certain abrasive products (product 6805) and certain glasses for corrective spectacles (product 7051 10 00). For French Guiana, the products concerned are certain kinds of rice (product 1006 20). For Martinique they are certain cereals (product 1008 90 90), certain flours (product 1102) and pebbles, gravel, etc. (product 2517 10).6.  Thirdly, in certain cases the products manufactured locally do not appear to be less competitive than those coming from outside the DOMs. These concern products currently falling within part A of the Annex to Decision 2004/162/EC where the volume of production in the DOM concerned is high and, although the differential applied is small, no imports of equivalent products have been recorded in the last three years analysed. These products should therefore be removed from the lists in the Annex to Decision 2004/162/EC. For Guadeloupe the products concerned are certain food production residues (product 2302). For Réunion the products concerned are certain residues from the manufacture of wood pulp (product 3804 00).7.  The amendments relating specifically to French Guiana, namely the addition of new products and an increase in the differential authorised for certain products, are justified in each case by the higher costs of the products manufactured locally compared with equivalent imported products manufactured in the European territory of the Union.8.  The amendments to be made in this respect for French Guiana consist principally in adding to the lists in the Annex to Decision 2004/162/EC the products which were already being manufactured locally in 2004 and for which no request for inclusion in the list of products to which differential taxation may be applied was made in 2004.9.  In the agriculture, fisheries and agri-food industry sectors, the products to be included in the lists in the Annex to Decision 2004/162/EC are certain meats (products 0201, 0202, 0203, 0204, 0208 and 0210), certain species of fish (products 0304 and 0305), certain meat preparations (products 1601 and 1602), certain sugar products (product 1702), certain breads, cakes or pastries (product 1905), certain preserved vegetables or fruit (products 2001 and 2006), jams (product 2007), certain sauces (product 2103), ice cream and other edible ice (product 2105), certain miscellaneous food preparations (product 2106) and certain liqueurs and cordials and rum-based beverages (products 2208 70 and 2208 90).10.  In the housing and construction sector the products concerned are certain plastic products (products 3919 and 3926), certain articles of cement, concrete or artificial stone, (product 6810 19) and certain iron products (products 7210, 7214 20, 7216, 7217 90 90, 7309, 7310 and 7314).11.  For products derived from forestry and other miscellaneous products, the products concerned are various woods and joinery products (products 4403 99 95, 4407 22, 4407 99 96, 4409 29 91, 4409 29 99, 4418 (except subheadings 4418 10 50, 4418 20 50, 4418 71, 4418 72 and 4418 79)), certain categories of furniture (products 9403 40 10 and 9406 except subheading 9406 00 31), certain printed products (products 4910 and 4911) and certain items of clothing (products 6109, 6205 and 6206).12.  For some products already included in the lists in the Annex to Decision 2004/162/EC, still referring to French Guiana, either the maximum differential concerned should be extended to cover subheadings of the Combined Nomenclature which they do not currently cover, or the maximum differential should be increased, or both.13.  Thus all fruit juices (product 2009), all mineral waters containing added sugar or other sweetening matter or flavoured (product 2202) and all plastic articles for the conveyance or packaging of goods (product 3923) should be included in list C of products to which a tax differential of 30 percentage points may be applied, while fruit juices of subheading 2009 80, mineral waters of heading 2202 10 and plastic articles for the conveyance or packaging of goods (product 3923), for which a tax differential of 20 percentage points is currently authorised, should be removed from list B.14.  In the case of cements, in list B (products to which a tax differential of 20 percentage points may be applied) white cement (product 2523 21 00) should be replaced by other Portland cement (product 2523 29). For structures and parts of structures of iron or steel, the authorised tax differential of 20 percentage points should be applied to all products of heading 7308 and not only to those of subheading 7308 90, as at present. For articles of aluminium, the tax differential of 20 percentage points should be applied to all products of heading 7610 and not only to those of subheading 7610 90, as at present. This would mean that this tax differential could also be applied to doors, windows, doorframes and thresholds for doors of heading 7610 10.15.  Finally, still in the case of French Guiana, three products which are not yet produced locally but for which there are concrete plans to launch production in the near future, should be added to the lists of products to which differentiated taxation may be applied. They are: milk (product 0401), mineral waters (product 2201) and certain articles of stone or other mineral substances (product 6815).16.  Decision 2004/162/EC should therefore be amended accordingly,HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:Article 1The Annex to Decision 2004/162/EC is amended in accordance with the Annex to this Decision.Article 2This Decision shall apply from […].Article 3This Decision is addressed to the French Republic.Done at Brussels,For the CouncilThe PresidentANNEXThe Annex to Decision 2004/162/EC is amended as follows:1) Part A is amended as follows:a) Point 1 is amended as follows:i) The following products are inserted:"0210, 0702, 0705, 0706 10 00, 0707 00, 0709 60, 0709 90, 2309, 6805".ii) Product "2302" is deleted.b) The following products are inserted in point 2: "1006 20, 2201".c) Point 3 is amended as follows:i) The following products are inserted:"1008 90 90, 1102, 2517 10".ii) Product "2811" is deleted.b) The following products are deleted from point 4: "3705 10 00, 3804 00".2) Part B is amended as follows:a) Point 1 is amended as follows:i) The following products are inserted:"3208, 3209, 3210, 7015 10 00".ii) The following products are deleted:"0210, 0702, 0705, 0706 10 00, 0707 00, 0709 60, 0709 90, 2302, 2309, 6805".b) Point 2 is amended as follows:i) The following products are inserted:"0201, 0202, 0203, 0204, 0208, 0210, 0304, 0305, 0401, 1905, 2105, 2523 29, 3919, 3926, 4910, 4911, 6109, 6205, 6206, 6810 19, 6815, 7210, 7214 20, 7216, 7217 90 90, 7308, 7309, 7310, 7314, 7610".ii) The following products are deleted:"1006 20, 2009 80, 2202 10, 2523 21 00, 3923, 7308 90, 7610 90".c) The following products are deleted from point 3: "1008 90 90, 1102, 3820 except 3820 00 00".d) The following products are deleted from point 4: "1507 90, 1510 00 90, 2828 10 00, 2828 90 00".3) Part C is amended as follows:a) The following products are deleted from point 1: "1517 10, 2517 10, 3208, 3209, 3210, 7015 10 00".b) The following products are inserted in point 2: "1601, 1602, 1702, 2001, 2006, 2007, 2009, 2103, 2106, 2202, 2208 70[6], 2208 90[7], 3923, 4403 99 95, 4407 22, 4407 99 96, 4409 29 91, 4409 29 99, 4418 except 4418 10 50, 4418 20 50, 4418 71, 4418 72 and 4418 79, 9403 40 10, 9406 except 9406 00 31".c) The following products are deleted from point 3: "1517 10, 2517 10".[1] COM(2010) xxx final of xx.xx.2010.[2] OJ C , , p. .[3] OJ L 52, 21.2.2004, p. 64.[4] COM(2010) xxx final of xx.xx.2010.[5] According to the classification of the Common Customs Tariff nomenclature.[6] Only rum-based products of heading 2208 40.[7] Only rum-based products of heading 2208 40.