CELEX: 62008TN0510
Language: en
Date: 2008-11-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-510/08: Action brought on 20 November 2008 — Toqueville v OHIM — Schiesaro (TOCQUEVILLE 13)

24.1.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 19/35
            
         Action brought on 20 November 2008 — Toqueville v OHIM — Schiesaro (TOCQUEVILLE 13)
   (Case T-510/08)
   (2009/C 19/66)
   Language in which the application was lodged: Italian
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Toqueville Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by: S. Bariatti, I. Palombella and E. Cucchiara, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Marco Schiesaro (Milan, Italy)
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 August 2008 in Case R 829/2008-2 Toqueville Srl v M. Schiesaro.
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   
      Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: word mark ‘TOCQUEVILLE 13’ (Community trade mark No 1.406.982) to designate goods and services in Classes 25, 41 and 42.
   
      Proprietor of the Community trade mark: the applicant.
   
      Applicant for the declaration of invalidity: Marco Schiesaro.
   
      Decision challenged before the Board of Appeal: the decision of the Cancellation Division to grant the application for partial revocation of the trade mark in question.
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: declaration that the appeal is inadmissible and rejection of a request for restitutio in integrum as regards the time-limit for filing an appeal against the decision of the Cancellation Division.
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 73 and 78 if Regulation (EC) No 40/94 on the Community trade mark, Articles 2 and 9 of Regulation (EC) No 2869/95 on the fees payable to the Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market and Article 50 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 implementing Regulation (EC) No 40/94.