CELEX: 62009TA0487
Language: en
Date: 2011-06-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-487/09: Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2011 — ReValue Immobilienberatung v OHIM (ReValue) (Community trade mark — Application for the Community figurative mark ReValue — Application refused in part — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

6.8.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 232/29
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2011 — ReValue Immobilienberatung v OHIM (ReValue)
   (Case T-487/09) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Application for the Community figurative mark ReValue - Application refused in part - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)
   2011/C 232/51
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: ReValue Immobilienberatung GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: initially, S. Fischoeder and M. Schork and, subsequently, S. Fischoeder (lawyers))
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Hanne, Agent)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 October 2009 (Case R 531/2009-4) concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign ReValue as a Community trade mark.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders ReValue Immobilienberatung GmbH to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 37, 13.2.2010.