CELEX: C2007/283/04
Language: en
Date: 2007-11-24 00:00:00
Title: Case C-4/07: Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Directive 2003/110/EC — Assistance in cases of transit for the purposes of removal by air — Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)

24.11.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 283/3
            
         Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 27 September 2007 — Commission of the European Communities v Portuguese Republic
   (Case C-4/07) (1)
   
   (Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 2003/110/EC - Assistance in cases of transit for the purposes of removal by air - Failure to transpose within the prescribed period)
   (2007/C 283/04)
   Language of the case: Portuguese
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: M. Condou-Durande and P. Guerra e Andrade, Agents)
   
      Defendant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Fernandes and F. Fraústo de Azevedo, Agents)
   Re:
   Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Failure to adopt, within the prescribed period, the provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/110/EC on assistance in cases of transit for the purposes of removal by air (OJ 2003 L 321, p. 26)
   Operative part of the judgment
   
               1.
            
            
               By failing to adopt, within the prescribed period, the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with Council Directive 2003/110/EC on assistance in cases of transit for the purposes of removal by air, the Portuguese Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 10(1) of that directive;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The Portuguese Republic is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 42, 24.2.2007.