CELEX: 62010CN0315
Language: en
Date: 2010-07-01 00:00:00
Title: Case C-315/10: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 1 July 2010 — Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Csn Cayman Ltd v Unifer Steel SL, BNP-Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI)

25.9.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 260/5
            
         Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto (Portugal) lodged on 1 July 2010 — Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Csn Cayman Ltd v Unifer Steel SL, BNP-Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI)
   (Case C-315/10)
   ()
   2010/C 260/06
   Language of the case: Portuguese
   
      Referring court
   
   Tribunal da Relação do Porto
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicants: Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Csn Cayman Ltd
   
      Defendants: Unifer Steel SL, BNP-Paribas (Suisse), Colepccl SA, Banco Português de Investimento SA (BPI)
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Does the fact that the Portuguese judicial authorities have declared that they lack jurisdiction by reason of nationality to hear an action concerning a commercial claim constitute an obstacle to the connection between causes of action referred to in Articles 6(1) and [28] of Regulation No 44/2001, (1) where the Portuguese court has another action pending before it, a Paulian action brought against both the debtor and the third-party transferee, in this case the transferee of a debt receivable, and the depositaries of the subject-matter of the claim assigned to the third-party transferee, the latter having their seats in Portugal, in order that they may all be bound by the res judicata decision to be given?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               In the event of a negative response, may Article 6(1) of Regulation No 44/2001 be freely applied to the case?
            
         
      (1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (OJ 2001 L 12, p. 1).