CELEX: C2005/106/24
Language: en
Date: 2005-04-30 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 28 January 2005 in Case C-208/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État in Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL v Région wallonne (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure — Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC — Concept of waste — List of materials that are equatable with products)

30.4.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 106/12
            
         
      ORDER OF THE COURT
   
   (Fifth Chamber)
   of 28 January 2005
   in Case C-208/04: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État in Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL v Région wallonne (1)
   
   (Article 104(3) of the Rules of Procedure - Directives 75/442/EEC and 91/156/EEC - Concept of waste - List of materials that are equatable with products)
   (2005/C 106/24)
   Language of the case: French
   In Case C-208/04: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC from the Conseil d'État (Council of State, Belgium), made by decision of 29 April 2004, received at the Court on 11 May 2004, in the proceedings between Inter-Environnement Wallonie ASBL and Région wallonne — the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of R. Silva de Lapuerta, President of the Chamber, P. Kūris (Rapporteur) and J. Klučka, Judges; C. Stix-Hackl, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, made an order on 28 January 2005, the operative part of which is as follows:
   
                
            
            
               Article 1(a) of Council Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on waste, as amended by Council Directive 91/156/EEC of 18 March 1991, precludes the introduction by States of a new category of materials which do not come under either the category of waste or that of products even though that new category of materials may contain substances or objects liable to meet the definition of ‘waste’ within the meaning of that provision.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 179 of 10.7.2004.