CELEX: 62006TA0315
Language: en
Date: 2008-11-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-315/06: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2008 — Ercros v OHIM (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark TAI CROS — Earlier national word marks CROS, SOCIEDAD ANÓNIMA CROS and ERCROS — Earlier national figurative marks CROS — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

10.1.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 6/23
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 19 November 2008 — Ercros v OHIM
   (Case T-315/06) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark TAI CROS - Earlier national word marks CROS, SOCIEDAD ANÓNIMA CROS and ERCROS - Earlier national figurative marks CROS - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - No similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2009/C 6/46)
   Language of the case: German
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Ercros, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: R. Thierie, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: R. Pethke, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Degussa GmbH, formerly Degussa AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: S. Schäffler, lawyer)
   Re:
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 September 2006 (Case R 29/2006-1) concerning opposition proceedings between Ercros, SA and Degussa GmbH.
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Ercros, SA to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 326, 30.12.2006.