CELEX: 62016CN0396
Language: en
Date: 2016-07-15 00:00:00
Title: Case C-396/16: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 15 July 2016 — T — 2, družba za ustvarjanje, razvoj in trženje elektronskih komunikacij in opreme, d.o.o. (currently in a state of insolvency) v Republika Slovenija

12.9.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 335/42
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Slovenia) lodged on 15 July 2016 — T — 2, družba za ustvarjanje, razvoj in trženje elektronskih komunikacij in opreme, d.o.o. (currently in a state of insolvency) v Republika Slovenija
   (Case C-396/16)
   (2016/C 335/57)
   Language of the case: Slovenian
   
      Referring court
   
   Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Appellant: T — 2, družba za ustvarjanje, razvoj in trženje elektronskih komunikacij in opreme, d.o.o. (currently in a state of insolvency)
   
      Respondent: Republika Slovenija
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Should the reduction of the obligations on the basis of an arrangement with creditors, as in the main proceedings, which has been approved by judicial decree and has acquired the force of res judicata be treated as a change in the factors used to determine the amount of input VAT to be deducted, within the meaning of Article 185(1) of the VAT Directive, (1) or should it be treated as a different situation, in which the deduction is higher or lower than that to which the taxable person was entitled, within the meaning of Article 184 of the VAT Directive?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Should the reduction of the obligations on the basis of an arrangement with creditors, as in the main proceedings, which has been approved by judicial decree and has acquired the force of res judicata be regarded as a (partial) non-payment of a transaction, within the meaning of the first subparagraph of Article 185(2) of the VAT Directive?
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Must a Member State, taking into account the requirements of clarity and certainty in legal situations imposed by the EU legislature and having regard for Article 186 of the VAT Directive, lay down, for the purpose of requiring adjustment of the deduction in the event of failure to make complete or partial payment, as permitted by the second subparagraph of Article 185(2) of that directive, detailed rules, in national law, to cover cases of non-payment, or may it include, in those rules, an arrangement with creditors approved by judicial decree which has acquired the force of res judicata (should this come within the concept of non-payment)?
            
         
      (1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).