CELEX: 62017TN0213
Language: en
Date: 2017-04-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-213/17: Action brought on 5 April 2017 — Romantik Hotels & Restaurants v EUIPO — Hotel Preidlhof (ROMANTIK)

29.5.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 168/33
            
         Action brought on 5 April 2017 — Romantik Hotels & Restaurants v EUIPO — Hotel Preidlhof (ROMANTIK)
   (Case T-213/17)
   (2017/C 168/43)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Romantik Hotels & Restaurants AG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: S. Hofmann and W. Göpfert, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Hotel Preidlhof GmbH (Naturns, Italy)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘ROMANTIK’ — EU trade mark No 2 527 109
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 February 2017 in Case R 1257/2016-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision, in so far as the declaration that EU trade mark No 2 527 109 ‘ROMANTIK’ (a word mark) is invalid is confirmed in that decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 52(1)(a) thereof;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 52(2) thereof.