CELEX: 62019TN0599
Language: en
Date: 2019-09-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-599/19: Action brought on 5 September 2019 — EM v Parliament

11.11.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 383/63
            
         
      Action brought on 5 September 2019 — EM v Parliament
      (Case T-599/19)
      (2019/C 383/72)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: EM (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Parliament
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  declare the present application admissible and well founded;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision dated 31 October 2018, which was confirmed by the decision dated 24 May 2019 rejecting the applicant’s complaint;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the payment of compensation in respect of the material harm allegedly suffered, amounting to EUR 165 000, and compensation in respect of the non-material harm allegedly suffered, estimated at the sum of EUR 50 000.
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to pay all the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging infringement of Articles 1 and 31 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights, infringement of Articles 12 and 12a(3) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, a failure to observe the duty to provide assistance and misuse of powers.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging breach of the duty of good administration, breach of the duty to have regard for the welfare of staff and a manifest error of assessment.