CELEX: 62017TN0655
Language: en
Date: 2017-09-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-655/17: Action brought on 25 September 2017 — Inditex v EUIPO — Ansell (ZARA TANZANIA ADVENTURES)

27.11.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 402/47
            
         Action brought on 25 September 2017 — Inditex v EUIPO — Ansell (ZARA TANZANIA ADVENTURES)
   (Case T-655/17)
   (2017/C 402/62)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Industria de Diseño Textil, SA (Inditex) (Arteixo, Spain) (represented by: G. Marín Raigal, G. Macías Bonilla, P. López Ronda, E. Armero Lavie, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Zainab Ansell (Moshi, Tanzania) and Roger Ansell (Moshi)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘ZARA TANZANIA ADVENTURES’ — Application for registration No 8 320 591
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 July 2017 in Joined Cases R 2330/2011-2 and R 2369/2011-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               partially annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the EUIPO dated 5 July 2017, in joined Cases R 2330/2011-2 and R 2369/2011-2, in particular regarding the allowing of the EUTM application No. 8320591 to proceed to registration for the challenged services in Classes 39 and 43;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order that the of the appeal action be borne by the defendant (EUIPO) and the intervener, and those incurred in proceedings before the EUIPO’s Opposition Division and the Second Board of Appeal by the intervener.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.