CELEX: 62012TA0576
Language: en
Date: 2014-07-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-576/12: Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2014  — Łaszkiewicz v OHIM — Capital Safety Group EMEA (PROTEKT) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community figurative mark PROTEKT — Earlier Community word marks PROTECTA — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009)

1.9.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 292/38
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 15 July 2014 — Łaszkiewicz v OHIM — Capital Safety Group EMEA (PROTEKT)
   (Case T-576/12) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community figurative mark PROTEKT - Earlier Community word marks PROTECTA - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))
   2014/C 292/46
   Language of the case: Polish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Grzegorz Łaszkiewicz (Łódź, Poland) (represented by: J. Gwiazdowska, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: D. Walicka, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Capital Safety Group EMEA SAS (Carros, France)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 October 2012 (Case R 700/2011-4) concerning opposition proceedings between Capital Safety Group EMEA SAS and Mr Grzegorz Łaszkiewicz.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Mr Grzegorz Łaszkiewicz to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 108, 13.4.2013.