CELEX: 62009TB0120
Language: en
Date: 2010-09-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-120/09: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Phoenix-Reisen and DRV v Commission (State aid — Subsidy provided for by German law for insolvent companies — Complaint for alleged breach of Community law — Rejection of the complaint — Adoption of a later decision — No need to adjudicate)

6.11.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 301/30
            
         Order of the General Court of 9 September 2010 — Phoenix-Reisen and DRV v Commission
   (Case T-120/09) (1)
   
   (State aid - Subsidy provided for by German law for insolvent companies - Complaint for alleged breach of Community law - Rejection of the complaint - Adoption of a later decision - No need to adjudicate)
   2010/C 301/51
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: Phoenix-Reisen GmbH (Bonn, Germany) and Deutscher Reiseverband eV (DRV) (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: R. Gerharz and A. Funke, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and B. Martenczuk, Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by J. Möller and B. Klein, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the Commission’s letter of 13 February 2009 in which it states its intention not to take action against the Federal Republic of Germany for alleged State aid paid by means of insolvency benefit payments.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for joinder of the present case with case T-58/10 lodged by the applicants.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Each party is to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 297, 5.12.2009.