CELEX: 62018TN0398
Language: en
Date: 2018-06-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-398/18: Action brought on 25 June 2018 — Pielczyk v EUIPO — Thalgo TCH (DERMAEPIL SUGAR EPIL SYSTEM)

201807270132025002018/C 285/613982018TC28520180813EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180625434421Case T-398/18: Action brought on 25 June 2018 — Pielczyk v EUIPO — Thalgo TCH (DERMAEPIL SUGAR EPIL SYSTEM)
 ---documentbreak--- C2852018EN4310120180625EN0061431442Action brought on 25 June 2018 — Pielczyk v EUIPO — Thalgo TCH (DERMAEPIL SUGAR EPIL SYSTEM)
   (Case T-398/18)2018/C 285/61Language of the case: English
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Radoslaw Pielczyk (Klijndijk, Netherlands) (represented by: K. Kielar, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thalgo TCH (Roquebrune-sur-Argens, France)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
   
      Trade mark at issue: European Union trade mark No 11 649 324
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 April 2018 in Joined Cases R 979/2017-4 and R 1070/2017-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
            —
         
         
            annul the contested decision in part, namely in so far as the Board of Appeal
            
                     a)
                  
                  
                     dismissed the Applicant’s appeal R 979/2017-4
                  
               
                     b)
                  
                  
                     partially allowed the cancellation Thalgo TCH’s appeal R 1070/2017-4 for the goods in Class 3 of the Nice Classification;
                  
               
                     c)
                  
                  
                     declared the EUTM No 11 649 324 also invalid for the indicated goods in Class 3;
                  
               
                     d)
                  
                  
                     upheld EUIPO’s decision of 21/03/2017 (Cancellation proceedings No 11 974 C) in part in which pursuant to the decision the Applicant’s trade mark has been declared invalid for goods in Class 3;
                  
               
      
            —
         
         
            order Thalgo TCH to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the cancellation Division of the EUIPO and the Board of Appeal;
         
      
            —
         
         
            order EUIPO to pay the costs of the present proceedings.
         
      
      Pleas in law
   
   
            —
         
         
            Infringement of Article 60(1)(a) in connection with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
         
      
            —
         
         
            Infringement of Rule 22(3)(4) in connection with Rule 40(6) of the Commission Regulation (Ec) No 2868/95;
         
      
            —
         
         
            Infringement of Article 64(2)(3) in connection with Article 18(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.