CELEX: C2007/183/30
Language: en
Date: 2007-08-04 00:00:00
Title: Case C-238/07 P: Appeal brought on 14 May 2007 by Derya Beyatli against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 5 March 2007 in Case T-455/04: Derya Beyatli and Armagan Candan v Commission of the European Communities

4.8.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 183/18
            
         Appeal brought on 14 May 2007 by Derya Beyatli against the order of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber) delivered on 5 March 2007 in Case T-455/04: Derya Beyatli and Armagan Candan v Commission of the European Communities
   (Case C-238/07 P)
   (2007/C 183/30)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Appellant: Derya Beyatli (represented by: A. Demetriades, Δικηγόρος)
   
      Other party: Commission of the European Communities
   Form of order sought
   The applicant claim that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               set aside the contested Order
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the Respondent's decision of 5 May 2004
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Respondent to pay the costs of this appeal
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   The appellant maintains that the contested order should be set aside on the following grounds:
   
                
            
            
               The Court of First Instance erred in law in failing to seek out evidence by means of measures of instruction or inquiry for the opening of the archives of not only EPSO but also of the European Community Representation in Cyprus and/or the Commission in general;
            
         
                
            
            
               As a result of the CFI's omission, the Respondents did not disclose all relevant correspondence between the European Community Representation in Cyprus and/or the Commission and/or EPSO. Therefore the appellant's rights regarding a fair hearing were infringed during the proceedings before the CFI.