CELEX: 62011TO0531
Language: en
Date: 2012-06-21 00:00:00
Title: Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2012. # Hamas v Council of the European Union. # Annulment action - Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism - Lis pendens. # Case T-531/11.

Order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 June 2012 —Hamas v Council(Case T-531/11)
      Annulment action — Restrictive measures with a view to combating terrorism — Lis pendens
      1.                     Proceedings — Objection of lis pendens — Same parties, subject-matter and submissions in two actions — Inadmissibility of
            the second action (see para. 15)
      2.                     Proceedings — Pleas in the application — Modification in the course of proceedings — Assimilation to the bringing of an action
            by means of an application (see para. 16)
      Re:
      
         
               Initially, action for annulment of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 687/2011 of 18 July 2011 implementing Article 2(3)
                  of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 on specific restrictive measures directed against certain persons and entities with a view
                  to combating terrorism, and repealing Implementing Regulations No 610/2010 and (EU) No 83/2011 (OJ 2011 L 188, p. 2), and
                  Council Decision 2011/430/CFSP of 18 July 2011 updating the list of persons, groups and entities subject to Articles 2, 3
                  and 4 of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism (OJ 2011 L 188, p. 47),
                  in so far as the applicant organisation’s name is maintained on the list of persons, groups and entities to which the freezing
                  of funds and economic resources laid down with a view to combating terrorism.
               
            Operative part
      
         
                  1.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
               
            
         
                  2.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	There is no need to give a ruling on the European Commission’s application for leave to intervene.
               
            
         
                  3.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Hamas is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Council of the European Union.