CELEX: 62013TN0531
Language: en
Date: 2013-09-26 00:00:00
Title: Case T-531/13: Action brought on 26 September 2013 — Kicks Kosmetikkedjan/OHIM — Kik Textilien und Non-Food (KICKS)

7.12.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 359/16
            
         Action brought on 26 September 2013 — Kicks Kosmetikkedjan/OHIM — Kik Textilien und Non-Food (KICKS)
   (Case T-531/13)
   2013/C 359/32
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Kicks Kosmetikkedjan AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: K. Strömholm, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Kik Textilien und Non-Food GmbH (Bönen, Germany)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs, or alternatively, if applicable, an intervening party to do so;
            
         
               —
            
            
               authorise the registration of the contested application No. 924 6166 in its entirety.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: Kicks Kosmetikkedjan AB
   
      Community trade mark concerned: the figurative mark ‘KICKS’ for goods and services in classes 3, 8, 14, 21 and 35 — application No 9246166
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Kik Textilien und Non-Food GmbH
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: the German and international word mark ‘kik’ for services in class 35
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: upheld the opposition for the contested goods and services
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: dismissal of the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Violation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.