CELEX: C2004/273/11
Language: en
Date: 2004-11-06 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 September 2004 in Case C-404/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales (Chancery Division): Nichols plc v Registrar of Trade Marks (Trade marks — Directive 89/104/EEC — Article 3(1)(b) — Trade mark comprising a common surname — Distinctive character — Impact of Article 6(1)(a) on assessment)

6.11.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 273/6
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
   
   (Second Chamber)
   of 16 September 2004
   in Case C-404/02 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales (Chancery Division): Nichols plc v Registrar of Trade Marks (1)
   
   (Trade marks - Directive 89/104/EEC - Article 3(1)(b) - Trade mark comprising a common surname - Distinctive character - Impact of Article 6(1)(a) on assessment)
   (2004/C 273/11)
   Language of the case: English
   In Case C-404/02: reference for a preliminary ruling under Article 234 EC, from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Chancery Division, (United Kingdom), made by decision of 3 September 2002, registered at the Court on 12 November 2002, in the proceedings between Nichols plc and Registrar of Trade Marks — the Court (Second Chamber), composed of: C.W.A. Timmermans, President of the Chamber, C. Gulmann (Rapporteur), J.-P. Puissochet, R. Schintgen and N. Colneric, Judges; D. Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer, Advocate General; M. Múgica Arzamendi, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 16 September 2004, in which it has ruled:
   In the context of Article 3(1)(b) of the First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks, the assessment of the existence or otherwise of the distinctive character of a trade mark constituted by a surname, even a common one, must be carried out specifically, in accordance with the criteria applicable to any sign covered by Article 2 of that directive, in relation, first, to the products or services in respect of which registration is applied for and, second, to the perception of the relevant consumers. The fact that the effects of registration of the trade mark are limited by virtue of Article 6(1)(a) of that directive has no impact on that assessment.
   
      (1)  OJ C 7, 11.1.2003.