CELEX: 62008TA0223
Language: en
Date: 2009-12-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-223/08: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 December 2009 — Iranian Tobacco v OHIM — AD Bulgartabac (Bahman) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Figurative Community trade mark Bahman — Interest in bringing proceedings not required — Article 55(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 56(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

30.1.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 24/48
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 3 December 2009 — Iranian Tobacco v OHIM — AD Bulgartabac (Bahman)
   (Case T-223/08) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Figurative Community trade mark Bahman - Interest in bringing proceedings not required - Article 55(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 56(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   2010/C 24/84
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Iranian Tobacco Co. (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: M. Beckensträter, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the Court of First Instance: AD Bulgartabac Holding Sofia (Sofia, Bulgaria) (represented by: M. Maček, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 April 2008 in Case R 709/2007-1 concerning revocation proceedings between AD Bulgartabac Holding Sofia and Iranian Tobacco Co.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               orders Iranian Tobacco to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 223 of 30.8.2008