CELEX: C2004/314/47
Language: en
Date: 2004-12-18 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance 12 October 2004 in Case T-35/03 Aventis Cropscience S.A. v Office for Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — Application for registration of Community word mark CARPO — Earlier national word mark HARPO Z — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94)

18.12.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 314/18
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   12 October 2004
   in Case T-35/03 Aventis Cropscience S.A. v Office for Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - Application for registration of Community word mark CARPO - Earlier national word mark HARPO Z - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94)
   (2004/C 314/47)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   In Case T-35/03 Aventis Cropscience S.A., established in Lyon (France), represented by Enrique Armijo Chávarri, lawyer, v Office for Harmonisation of the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: I. de Medrano Caballero and G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings being BASF Aktiengesellschaft, established in Ludwigshafen am Rhein (Germany), for the annulment of Decision R 803/2001-2 of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 November 2002 concerning the opposition by the proprietor of the earlier national word mark HARPO Z to registration of the trade mark CARPO, the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, N.J. Forwood and I. Pelikánová, Judges; Registrar: I. Natsinas, administrator, gave a judgment on 12 October 2004, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the application;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 83 of 5.4.2003.