CELEX: C2004/228/95
Language: en
Date: 2004-09-11 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 2 June 2004 in Case T-123/03 Pfizer Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (Medicinal products for human use — Initiation, under Article 30 of Directive 2001/83/EC, of the procedure under Article 32 of that directive — Application for annulment — Measure against which an action may be brought — Preparatory measure — Inadmissible)

11.9.2004   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 228/42
            
         
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 2 June 2004
   in Case T-123/03 Pfizer Ltd v Commission of the European Communities (1)
   
   (Medicinal products for human use - Initiation, under Article 30 of Directive 2001/83/EC, of the procedure under Article 32 of that directive - Application for annulment - Measure against which an action may be brought - Preparatory measure - Inadmissible)
   (2004/C 228/95)
   Language of the case: English
   In Case T-123/03: Pfizer Ltd, established in Sandwich, Kent (United Kingdom), represented by D. Anderson QC, K. Bacon, Barrister, I. Dodds-Smith and T. Fox, Solicitors, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: H. Støvlbaek and X. Lewis, acting as Agents, with an address for service in Luxembourg ) — application for the annulment of the Commission Decision of 6 January 2003 initiating a referral to the European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA) in relation to Lopid under Article 30 of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use (OJ 2001 L 311, p. 67) — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: H. Legal, President, V. Tilli and M. Vilaras, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 2 June 2004, the operative part of which is as follows:
   
               1.
            
            
               The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The applicant shall pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 171 of 19.7.2003.