CELEX: 62018CA0317
Language: en
Date: 2019-06-13 00:00:00
Title: Case C-317/18: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Faro) — Cátia Correia Moreira v Município de Portimão (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2001/23/EC — Transfers of undertakings — Safeguarding of employees’ rights — Concept of ‘worker’ — Substantial change in working conditions to the detriment of the employee)

5.8.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 263/16
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 13 June 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Faro) — Cátia Correia Moreira v Município de Portimão
      (Case C-317/18) (1)
      
      (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2001/23/EC - Transfers of undertakings - Safeguarding of employees’ rights - Concept of ‘worker’ - Substantial change in working conditions to the detriment of the employee)
      (2019/C 263/20)
      Language of the case: Portuguese
      
         Referring court
      
      Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Faro
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Cátia Correia Moreira
      
         Defendant: Município de Portimão
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Council Directive 2001/23/EC of 12 March 2001 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to the safeguarding of employees’ rights in the event of transfers of undertakings, businesses or parts of undertakings or businesses, in particular Article 2(1)(d), must be interpreted as meaning that a person who has entered into a contract for a position of trust, within the meaning of the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings, with the transferor may be regarded as an ‘employee’ and thus benefit from the protection which that directive affords, provided, however, that that person is protected as an employee by that legislation and has a contract of employment at the date of transfer, which is a matter for the referring court to determine.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Directive 2001/23, read in conjunction with Article 4(2) TEU, must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes national legislation which provides that, in the event of a transfer within the meaning of that directive and where the transferee is a municipality, the employees concerned must, first, undergo a public competitive selection procedure and, secondly, have a new relationship with the transferee.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 268, 30.7.2018.