CELEX: 62015CB0514
Language: en
Date: 2016-07-07 00:00:00
Title: Case C-514/15 P: Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — HIT Groep BV v European Commission (Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — European prestressing steel market — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 23(2) — Calculation of the amount of the fine — Upper limit of the fine — Total turnover in the ‘preceding business year’ — Reference to a business year other than the one preceding the adoption of the contested decision — Principle of proportionality)

3.10.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 364/9
            
         
      Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 July 2016 — HIT Groep BV v European Commission
      (Case C-514/15 P) (1)
      
      ((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European prestressing steel market - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 23(2) - Calculation of the amount of the fine - Upper limit of the fine - Total turnover in the ‘preceding business year’ - Reference to a business year other than the one preceding the adoption of the contested decision - Principle of proportionality))
      (2016/C 364/03)
      Language of the case: Dutch
      
         Parties
      
      
         Appellant: HIT Groep BV (represented by: G. van der Wal and L. Parret, advocaten)
      
         Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Van Nuffel, S. Noë and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The appeal is dismissed.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Hit Groep BV shall pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 398, 30.11.2015.