CELEX: 62019CA0441
Language: en
Date: 2021-01-14 00:00:00
Title: Case C-441/19: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats’s-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — TQ v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Area of freedom, security and justice — Directive 2008/115/EC — Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals — Article 5(a), Article 6(1) and (4), Article 8(1) and Article 10 — Return decision issued against an unaccompanied minor — Best interests of the child — Obligation for the Member State concerned to be satisfied, before the adoption of a return decision, that that minor will be returned to a member of his or her family, a nominated guardian or adequate reception facilities in the State of return — Distinction on the basis solely of the criterion of the age of the minor in order to grant a right of residence — Return decision not followed by removal measures)

8.3.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 79/10
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 January 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats’s-Hertogenbosch — Netherlands) — TQ v Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
      (Case C-441/19) (1)
      
      (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Area of freedom, security and justice - Directive 2008/115/EC - Common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals - Article 5(a), Article 6(1) and (4), Article 8(1) and Article 10 - Return decision issued against an unaccompanied minor - Best interests of the child - Obligation for the Member State concerned to be satisfied, before the adoption of a return decision, that that minor will be returned to a member of his or her family, a nominated guardian or adequate reception facilities in the State of return - Distinction on the basis solely of the criterion of the age of the minor in order to grant a right of residence - Return decision not followed by removal measures)
      (2021/C 79/11)
      Language of the case: Dutch
      
         Referring court
      
      Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats’s-Hertogenbosch
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Appellant: TQ
      
         Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Justitie en Veiligheid
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, read in conjunction with Article 5(a) of that directive and Article 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as meaning that, before issuing a return decision against an unaccompanied minor, the Member State concerned must carry out a general and in-depth assessment of the situation of that minor, taking due account of the best interests of the child. In this context, that Member State must ensure that adequate reception facilities are available for the unaccompanied minor in question in the State of return.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Article 6(1) of Directive 2008/115, read in conjunction with Article 5(a) of that directive and in the light of Article 24(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as meaning that a Member State may not distinguish between unaccompanied minors solely on the basis of the criterion of their age for the purpose of ascertaining whether there are adequate reception facilities in the State of return;
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Article 8(1) of Directive 2008/115 must be interpreted as precluding a Member State, after it has adopted a return decision in respect of an unaccompanied minor and has been satisfied, in accordance with Article 10(2) of that directive, that that minor will be returned to a member of his or her family, a nominated guardian or adequate reception facilities in the State of return, from refraining from subsequently removing that minor until he or she reaches the age of 18 years.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 270, 12.8.2019.