CELEX: C2005/193/44
Language: en
Date: 2005-08-06 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 31 May 2005 in Case T-373/03 Solo Italia Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Word mark PARMITALIA — Time-limit for bringing an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division — Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Rule 48 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — Inadmissibility of the appeal)

6.8.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 193/27
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 31 May 2005
   in Case T-373/03 Solo Italia Srl v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Word mark PARMITALIA - Time-limit for bringing an appeal against the decision of the Opposition Division - Article 59 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Rule 48 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Inadmissibility of the appeal)
   (2005/C 193/44)
   Language of the case: French
   In Case T-373/03: Solo Italia Srl, established in Ossona (Italy), represented by A. Bensoussan, M.-E. Haas and L. Tellier-Loniewski, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: I. de Medrano Caballero and A. Folliard-Monguiral), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM and intervener before the Court of First Instance being Nuova Sala Srl, established in Brescia (Italy), represented by E. Gavuzzi, S. Hassan and C. Pastore, lawyers — application brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 September 2003 (Case R 208/2003-2), confirming the refusal to register the word mark PARMITALIA — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of J.D. Cooke, President, I. Labucka and V. Trstenjak, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 31 May 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 21 of 24.1.2004.