CELEX: C1997/228/55
Language: en
Date: 1997-07-26 00:00:00
Title: Action brought on 26 May 1997 by Carlos Gómez de la Cruz Talegón against Commission of the European Communities (Case T-165/97)

26 . 7 . 97           EN                    Official Journal of the European Communities                               No C 228/23
Action brought on 24 May 1997 by Albert Verleysen                      — declare that the applicant is entitled to a review of his
   against the Commission of the European Communities                       initial classification as from his appointment on
                        ( Case T-162/97 )                                   1 November 1992 pursuant to Article 31 ( 2 ) and
                                                                            Article 32 of the Staff Regulations, and to
                           ( 97/C 228/54 )                                  readjustment of his career,
                 (Language of the case: French)
                                                                       — order the defendant to pay all the costs of these
                                                                            proceedings.
An action against the Commission of the European
Communities was brought before the Court of First
Instance of the European Communities on 24 May 1997                    Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:
by Albert Verleysen, residing at Denderleuuw ( Belgium),
represented by Marc-Albert Lucas, of the Liege Bar, with               The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those
an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of                relied upon in Case T-16/97 (').
Evelyne Korn, 21 Rue de Nassau.
                                                                       C ) OJ No C 74, 8 . 3 . 1997, p . 27.
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— annul the Commission's decision of 14 August 1996
     rejecting the applicant's request that he be reclassified
     in the higher grade of his career bracket in accordance           Action brought on 28 May 1997 by Kyriakos Skrikas
     with Article 31 ( 2 ) of the Staff Regulations,                                   against the European Parliament
                                                                                                ( Case T-167/97 )
— annul the Commission's decision of 3 February 1997
     rejecting the administrative complaint made by the                                           ( 97/C 228/56 )
     applicant against the first of the contested decisions,                            (Language of the case: French)
— order the defendant to pay the costs.                                An action against the European Parliament was brought
                                                                       before the Court of First Instance of the European
Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:                    Communities on 28 May 1997 by Kyriakos Skrikas,
                                                                       residing in Luxembourg, represented by Jean-Noel Louis,
The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as in                 Thierry Demaseure and Ariane Tornel, of the Brussels Bar,
Case T-16/97 I 1 ).                                                    with an address for service in Luxembourg at the offices
                                                                       of Fiduciaire Myson Sari, 30 Rue de Cessange.
O OJ No C 74, 8 . 3 . 1997, p . 27.
                                                                       The applicant claims that the Court should:
                                                                       — annul the decision not to promote the applicant to
                                                                             grade C 3 in the course of the 1996 promotions
                                                                             procedure,
Action brought on 26 May 1997 by Carlos Gomez de la
Cruz Talegon against Commission of the European                        — order the defendant to pay the costs.
                             Communities
                         ( Case T-165/97)                              Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:
                            ( 97/C 228/55 )
                                                                        In the context of the 1996 promotions procedure, the
                 (Language of the case: Spanish)                        appointing authority considered 28 potential promotions
                                                                        from grade C 4 to grade C 3 amongst a total of 186
 An action against the Commission of the European                       officials eligible for promotion, including the applicant.
 Communities was brought before the Court of First
 Instance of the European Communities on 26 May 1997                    The applicant, who was not promoted, maintains that the
 by Carlos Gomez de la Cruz Talegon, residing at                        adoption of the contested decision infringed Article 45 of
 Luxembourg, represented by Victor Gomez de la Cruz, of                 the Staff Regulations and breached the principle of
 the Malaga Bar, with an address for service in                         equality of treatment and non-discrimination and the
 Luxembourg c/o Consuelo Perez Anaya, 24 Marguerite de                  applicant's legitimate rights and interests, in particular his
 Brabant .                                                              interest in being promoted to grade C 3 following his
                                                                        reassignment to the 'Minutes' Division of the Parliament's
 The applicant claims that the Court should :                           Directorate-General 1 .
 — annul the decision adopted by the Commission                         According to the applicant, the contested decision was
      ( appointing authority) on 30 July 1996 not to                    adopted in breach of the rules governing the promotions
      reclassify the applicant and the decision of the                  procedure . He claims that it is vitiated by a manifest error
      Commission of 3 February 1997 rejecting the                       committed in the course of consideration of the merits of
      complaint made by the applicant against that refusal,             those eligible for promotion to grade C 3 , that it is totally