CELEX: 62014TA0076
Language: en
Date: 2016-09-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-76/14: Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Morningstar v Commission (Competition — Abuse of a dominant position — Worldwide market for consolidated real-time datafeeds — Decision making the commitments offered by the dominant undertaking binding — Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003)

24.10.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 392/25
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2016 — Morningstar v Commission
   (Case T-76/14) (1)
   
   ((Competition - Abuse of a dominant position - Worldwide market for consolidated real-time datafeeds - Decision making the commitments offered by the dominant undertaking binding - Article 9 of Regulation (EC) No 1/2003))
   (2016/C 392/29)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Morningstar, Inc. (Chicago, Illinois, United States of America) (represented by: S. Kinsella, K. Daly, P. Harrison, Solicitors, and M. Abenhaïm, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, A. Dawes and F. Ronkes Agerbeek, acting as Agents)
   
      Interveners in support of the defendant: Thomson Reuters Corp. (Toronto, Canada), and Reuters Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: A. Nourry, G. Olsen and C. Ghosh, Solicitors)
   
      Re:
   
   Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 9635 final of 20 December 2012 relating to a proceeding under Article 102 TFEU and Article 54 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/D2/39.654 — Reuters Instrument Codes (RICs)).
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Morningstar, Inc. to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 135, 5.5.2014.