CELEX: 62008TN0052
Language: en
Date: 2008-02-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-52/08 P: Appeal brought on 5 February 2008 by Commission of the European Communities against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 22 November 2007 in Case F-110/06, Carpi Badía v Commission

12.4.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 92/38
            
         Appeal brought on 5 February 2008 by Commission of the European Communities against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal delivered on 22 November 2007 in Case F-110/06, Carpi Badía v Commission
   
   (Case T-52/08 P)
   (2008/C 92/76)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Appellant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by G. Berscheid and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: José María Carpi Badía (Luxembourg, Grand Duchy of Luxembourg)
   Form of order sought by the appellant
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 22 November 2007 in Case F-110/06 Carpi Badía v Commission and refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the respondent to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   By the present appeal, the Commission seeks annulment of the judgment of 22 November 2007 in Case F-110/06 Carpi Badía v Commission, by which the Civil Service Tribunal (CST) annulled its decision allocating to the applicant at first instance a number of priority points insufficient for him to be promoted in promotion year 2005 and its decision finalising the list of officials promoted during that promotion year inasmuch as it does not include the applicant's name.
   In support of its appeal, the Commission raises three pleas in law seeking annulment identical to those raised in Case T-51/08 P Commission v Dittert.