CELEX: 62009TA0363
Language: en
Date: 2010-12-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-363/09: Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Gruppo Lepetit (RESVEROL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark RESVEROL — Earlier international word mark LESTEROL — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

12.2.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 46/12
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 16 December 2010 — Longevity Health Products v OHIM — Gruppo Lepetit (RESVEROL)
   (Case T-363/09) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark RESVEROL - Earlier international word mark LESTEROL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2011/C 46/23
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Longevity Health Products, Inc. (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Gruppo Lepetit SpA (Lainate, Italy)
   
      Re:
   
   ACTION brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 July 2009 (Case R 1204/2008-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Gruppo Lepetit SpA and Longevity Health Products, Inc.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Longevity Health Products, Inc., to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 267, 7.11.2009.