CELEX: C2006/310/28
Language: en
Date: 2006-12-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-483/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 October 2006 — Armour Pharmaceutical v OHIM — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (GALZIN) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark GALZIN — Earlier national word mark CALSYN — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of goods and signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 — Findings of OHIM — Admissibility)

16.12.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 310/15
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 17 October 2006 — Armour Pharmaceutical v OHIM — Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (GALZIN)
   (Case T-483/04) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark GALZIN - Earlier national word mark CALSYN - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of goods and signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 43(2) and (3) of Regulation No 40/94 - Findings of OHIM - Admissibility)
   (2006/C 310/28)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Armour Pharmaceutical Co. (Bridgewater, New Jersey United States) (represented by: R. Gilbey, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Pétrequin, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd (Jerusalem, Israel)
   Re:
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 September 2004 (Case R 295/2003-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Armour Pharmaceutical Co. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 7 September 2004 (Case R 295/2003-4);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the applicant.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 69, 19.3.2005.