CELEX: 62010CA0015
Language: en
Date: 2011-07-21 00:00:00
Title: Case C-15/10: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)) — Etimine SA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Environment and protection of human health — Directive 67/548/EEC — Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 — Borate substances — Classification as reprotoxic substances in category 2 — Directive 2008/58/EC and Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 — Adaptation of the classifications to technical and scientific progress — Validity — Methods of assessing the intrinsic properties of those substances — Manifest error of assessment — Legal basis — Obligation to state reasons — Principle of proportionality)

10.9.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 269/10
            
         Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 July 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)) — Etimine SA v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
   (Case C-15/10) (1)
   
   (Environment and protection of human health - Directive 67/548/EEC - Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 - Borate substances - Classification as reprotoxic substances in category 2 - Directive 2008/58/EC and Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 - Adaptation of the classifications to technical and scientific progress - Validity - Methods of assessing the intrinsic properties of those substances - Manifest error of assessment - Legal basis - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of proportionality)
   2011/C 269/15
   Language of the case: English
   
      Referring court
   
   High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Claimant: Etimine SA
   
      Defendant: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions
   
      Intervener: Borax Europe Ltd
   
      Re:
   
   Reference for a preliminary ruling — High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — Validity, so far as concerns the classification of borates as substances toxic for reproduction, of Commission Directive 2008/58/EC of 21 August 2008 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, for the 30th time, Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances (OJ 2008 L 246, p. 1) and of Commission Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 of 10 August 2009 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures (OJ 2009 L 235, p. 1) — Incorrect assessment of the existence, as required by Annex VI to Directive 67/548/EEC, of a risk upon normal handling and use of the substance
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Examination of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity, first, of Commission Directive 2008/58/EC of 21 August 2008 amending, for the purpose of its adaptation to technical progress, for the 30th time, Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances and, second, of Commission Regulation (EC) No 790/2009 of 10 August 2009 amending, for the purposes of its adaptation to technical and scientific progress, Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, in so far as that directive and that regulation classified certain borate substances as reprotoxic in category 2.
   
      (1)  OJ C 63, 13.3.2010.