CELEX: 62014TN0505
Language: en
Date: 2014-07-01 00:00:00
Title: Case T-505/14: Action brought on 1 July 2014 — Seven for all mankind v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND)

1.9.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 292/54
            
         Action brought on 1 July 2014 — Seven for all mankind v OHIM — Seven (SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND)
   (Case T-505/14)
   2014/C 292/66
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Seven for all mankind LLC (Vernon, United States) (represented by: A. Gautier-Sauvagnac, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Seven SpA (Leinì, Italy)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 9 April 2014 given in Case R 1277/2013-1;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘SEVEN FOR ALL MANKIND’ for goods in Classes 14 and 18 — Community trade mark application No 4 4 43  222
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: The figurative Community trademarks containing the verbal element ‘Seven’
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in part
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Accepted the appeal in part
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.