CELEX: 62013TA0349
Language: en
Date: 2016-07-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-349/13: Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2016 — Orange Business Belgium v Commission (Public service contracts — Tender procedure — Provision of ‘Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations — new generation (TESTA-ng)’ — Rejection of a tenderer’s bid — Award of the contract — Transparency — Equal treatment — Non-discrimination — Obligation to state reasons)

22.8.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 305/24
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2016 — Orange Business Belgium v Commission
   (Case T-349/13) (1)
   
   ((Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Provision of ‘Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations - new generation (TESTA-ng)’ - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Award of the contract - Transparency - Equal treatment - Non-discrimination - Obligation to state reasons))
   (2016/C 305/32)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Orange Business Belgium SA (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Schutyser and T. Villé, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude, S. Lejeune and F. Moro, acting as Agents, and by P. Wytinck and B. Hoorelbeke, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of 19 April 2013 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the restricted call for tenders DIGIT/R2/PR/2011/039 ‘Trans-European Services for Telematics between Administrations — new generation (TESTA-ng)’, and awarding the contract to another tenderer.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Orange Business Belgium SA to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 252, 31.8.2013.