CELEX: 62016CA0349
Language: en
Date: 2017-06-15 00:00:00
Title: Case C-349/16: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — T.KUP SAS v Belgische Staat (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Dumping — Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 — Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam — Validity of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 — Expiry review of anti-dumping measures — Unrelated importers — Sampling — European Union interest)

21.8.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 277/17
            
         Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — T.KUP SAS v Belgische Staat
   (Case C-349/16) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Dumping - Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 - Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam - Validity of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 - Expiry review of anti-dumping measures - Unrelated importers - Sampling - European Union interest))
   (2017/C 277/23)
   Language of the case: Dutch
   
      Referring court
   
   Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: T.KUP SAS
   
      Defendant: Belgische Staat
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The examination of the questions referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and originating in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96.
   
      (1)  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.