CELEX: C2000/335/89
Language: en
Date: 2000-11-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-252/00: Action brought on 15 September 2000 by Cooperativa Ducale fra Gondolieri di Venezia s.c.a r.l. and Others against Commission of the European Communities

25.11.2000             EN                       Official Journal of the European Communities                                     C 335/47
Action brought on 15 September 2000 by Cooperativa                         The applicant claims that the Court should:
Ducale fra Gondolieri di Venezia s.c.a r.l. and Others
    against Commission of the European Communities                         —     annul the decision not to pay the applicant the allowance
                                                                                 to which he is entitled following termination of his
                                                                                 service as a member of the temporary staff with CEDEFOP
                         (Case T-252/00)
                                                                                 in Thessaloniki;
                         (2000/C 335/89)                                   —     order the defendant to pay the costs.
                    (Language of the case: Italian)                        Pleas in law and main arguments
An action against the Commission of the European Communi-                  The applicant is an official in the Secretariat-General of the
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the                 Council. He was seconded by his institution to the European
European Communities on 15 September 2000 by Cooperati-                    Centre for Development and Occupational Training (CEDE-
va Ducale fra Gondolieri di Venezia s.c.a r.l. and Others,                 FOP) in Thessaloniki, where he served as a member of the
represented by Mario Giantin, of the Venice Bar.                           temporary staff. After subsequently terminating his service
                                                                           with CEDEFOP and being reinstated at the Council, he
                                                                           requested a (re)installation allowance, which was refused by
The applicants claim that the Court should:                                the contested decision.
—     annul Commission Decision 2000/394/EEC;                              By the present action the applicant seeks annulment of that
                                                                           decision on the ground that it infringes Article 25 of the Staff
—     order the Commission to pay the costs.                               Regulations, Article 24(2) of the Rules of Employment of
                                                                           Other Servants and Article 5(2) of Annex VII to the Staff
                                                                           Regulations.
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied upon in
Cases T-234/00 Fondazione Opera S. Maria della Carità v
Commission and T-235/00 Codess Sociale and Others (1).
The applicants point out that they have standing, as two                   Action brought on 25 September 2000 by Anne Puers
cooperatives operating gondoliers, to claim that there is no                 against the Commission of the European Communities
anti-competitive effect arising from the alleged ‘aid measure’,
as well as the need for their business to survive, for the sake of                                 (Case T-307/00)
the environment, culture and tourism of the area concerned.
                                                                                                   (2000/C 335/91)
(1) not yet published.
                                                                                              (Language of the case: French)
                                                                           An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
                                                                           ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
                                                                           European Communities on 25 September 2000 by Anne
                                                                           Puers, of Brussels, represented by J.-N. Louis and V. Peere, of
                                                                           the Brussels Bar.
Action brought on 18 September 2000 by Michel Hend-
rickx against the European Centre for Development and                      The applicant claims that the Court should:
              Occupational Training (CEDEFOP)
                                                                           —     annul the decision of the Commission notified on
                         (Case T-298/00)                                         25 November 1999 refusing to award an orphan’s pen-
                                                                                 sion to the applicant’s child;
                         (2000/C 335/90)                                   —     order the defendant to pay the costs.
                    (Language of the case: French)                         Pleas in law and main arguments
An action against CEDEFOP was brought before the Court of                  The applicant, an official of the Commission, applied under
First Instance of the European Communities on 18 September                 Article 80 of the Staff Regulations for an orphan’s pension for
2000 by Michel Hendrickx, residing in Brussels, represented                her daughter following the death of the child’s father, with
by J.-N. Louis and V. Peere, of the Brussels Bar.                          whom the applicant cohabited.