CELEX: 62013CA0021
Language: en
Date: 2014-09-04 00:00:00
Title: Case C-21/13: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Simon, Evers & Co. GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Commercial policy — Anti-dumping duties — Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 — Validity — Imports of products originating in China — Imports of the same products consigned from Thailand — Circumvention — Proof — Refusal to cooperate)

10.11.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 395/9
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Hamburg — Germany) — Simon, Evers & Co. GmbH v Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen
      (Case C-21/13) (1)
      
      ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Commercial policy - Anti-dumping duties - Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 - Validity - Imports of products originating in China - Imports of the same products consigned from Thailand - Circumvention - Proof - Refusal to cooperate))
      (2014/C 395/11)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Referring court
      
      Finanzgericht Hamburg
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Simon, Evers & Co. GmbH
      
         Defendant: Hauptzollamt Hamburg-Hafen
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      Consideration of the question raised by the referring court has disclosed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 499/2009 of 11 June 2009 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation (EC) No 1174/2005 on imports of hand pallet trucks and their essential parts originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of the same product consigned from Thailand, whether declared as originating in Thailand or not.
      
         (1)  OJ C 114, 20.4.2013.