CELEX: C2003/213/06
Language: en
Date: 2003-09-06 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 27 March 2003 in Case C-1/02 SA: Antippas v Commission of the European Communities (Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on the Commission of the European Communities)

C 213/4                   EN                         Official Journal of the European Union                                              6.9.2003
measures are not less favourable than those governing similar                                    ORDER OF THE COURT
domestic actions and do not make it practically impossible or
excessively difficult to exercise the rights conferred by Community
law.
                                                                                                      (Sixth Chamber)
( 1) OJ C 3 of 5.1.2002.
                                                                                                     of 28 March 2003
                                                                             in Case C-75/02 P: Territorio Histórico de Áava —
                                                                             Diputación Foral de Álava, Territorio Histórico de Bizkaia
                                                                             — Diputación Foral de Bizkaia, Territorio Histórico de
                                                                             Gipuzkoa — Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa y Juntas
                                                                             Generales de Gipuzkoa and Comunidad Autónoma del
                      ORDER OF THE COURT                                     País Vasco — Gobierno Vasco v Commission of the
                                                                                                European Communities (1)
                            (Fifth Chamber)
                                                                             (Appeal — State aid — Aid in the steel sector — Action for
                           of 27 March 2003                                  annulment — Article 33 CS — Action brought by an intra-
                                                                                   State authority — Appeal manifestly unfounded)
in Case C-1/02 SA: Antippas v Commission of the Euro-
                        pean Communities (1)
                                                                                                       (2003/C 213/07)
(Application for authorisation to serve a garnishee order on
        the Commission of the European Communities)                                             (Language of the case: Spanish)
                            (2003/C 213/06)
                                                                             (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
                                                                                                in the European Court Reports)
                      (Language of the case: French)
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
                     in the European Court Reports)
                                                                             In Case C-75/02 P: Territorio Histórico de Áava — Diputación
                                                                             Foral de Álava, Territorio Histórico de Bizkaia — Diputación
                                                                             Foral de Bizkaia, Territorio Histórico de Gipuzkoa — Diputa-
In Case C-1/02 SA, Antippas, company incorporated under                      ción Foral de Gipuzkoa y Juntas Generales de Gipuzkoa and
Congolese law, established in Kinshasa (Democratic Republic                  Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco — Gobierno Vasco v
of the Congo), (avocat: M. Spandre) v Commission of the                      Commission of the European Communities (avocat: R. Falcón
European Communities (Agents: M. De Pauw and B. Mar-                         y Tella) APPEAL against the order of the Court of First Instance
tenczuk) — application for authorisation to serve a garnishee                of the European Communities (Third Chamber, Extended
order on the Commission of the European Communities — the                    Composition) delivered on 11 January 2002 in Case T-77/01
Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: M. Wathelet, President of                Diputación Floral de Álava and Others v Commission [2002]
the Chamber, C.W.A. Timmermans, P. Jann S. von Bahr                          ECR II-81, by which the Court held inadmissible the action
(Rapporteur) and A. Rosas, Judges; L.A. Geelhoed, Advocate                   brought by the appellants against Commission Decision 2001/
General; R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 27 March               168/ECSC of 31 October 2000 on Spain’ corporation tax laws
2003, the operative part of which is as follows:                             (OJ 2001 L 60, p. 57), seeking to have that order set aside the
                                                                             other party to the proceedings being Commission of the
                                                                             European Communities (Agents: G. Rozet and J.L. Buendía
1.    The application is dismissed.                                          Sierra) — the Court (Sixth Chamber), composed of: J.-P.
                                                                             Puissochet (Rapporteur), President of the Chamber, G. Gul-
                                                                             mann, F. Macken and N. Coleric, and J.N. Cunha Rodrigues,
2.    Antippas is ordered to pay the costs.
                                                                             Judges; A. Tizzano, Advocate General; R. Grass, Registrar, has
                                                                             given a judgment on 28 March 2003, the operative part of
                                                                             which is as follows:
( 1) OJ C 247 of 12.10.2002.
                                                                             1.    The appeal is dismissed.