CELEX: 62014TN0220
Language: en
Date: 2014-04-02 00:00:00
Title: Case T-220/14: Action brought on 2 April 2014  — Saremar v Commission

10.6.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 175/50
            
         Action brought on 2 April 2014 — Saremar v Commission
   (Case T-220/14)
   2014/C 175/69
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Saremar — Sardegna Regionale Marittima SpA (Caglliari, Italy) (represented by: G. Roberti, G. Bellitti and I. Perego, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the General Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul, in whole or in part, the contested decision in so far as:
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           it classified the compensation paid for public services pursuant to Regional Law No 15 of 7 August 2012 and the capital finance approved by the general meeting of Saremar’s shareholders on 15 June 2012 as State aid;
                        
                     
                           —
                        
                        
                           it found those measures to be incompatible with the internal market and ordered that they be recovered;
                        
                     
         
               —
            
            
               declare, pursuant to Article 277 TFEU, that Article 4(f) of Decision 2012/21/EU and point 9 of the European Union Framework for State aid in the form of public service compensation (2011) are unlawful and inapplicable;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Commission to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The pleas in law and main arguments relied on are the same as those put forward in Case T-219/14 Regione della Sardegna v Commission.