CELEX: 62018CA0063
Language: en
Date: 2019-09-26 00:00:00
Title: Case C-63/18: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Italy) — Vitali SpA v Autostrade per l’Italia SpA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU — Public procurement — Directive 2014/24/EU — Article 71 — Subcontracting — National legislation limiting the possibility of subcontracting to 30 % of the total amount of the contract)

25.11.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 399/10
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 September 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia — Italy) — Vitali SpA v Autostrade per l’Italia SpA
      (Case C-63/18) (1)
      
      (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Public procurement - Directive 2014/24/EU - Article 71 - Subcontracting - National legislation limiting the possibility of subcontracting to 30 % of the total amount of the contract)
      (2019/C 399/10)
      Language of the case: Italian
      
         Referring court
      
      Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Lombardia
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Vitali SpA
      
         Defendant: Autostrade per l’Italia SpA
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2170 of 24 November 2015, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which limits to 30 % the share of the contract which the tenderer is permitted to subcontract to third parties.
      
         (1)  OJ C 166, 14.5.2018