CELEX: 62016TN0664
Language: en
Date: 2016-09-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-664/16: Action brought on 14 September 2016 — PJ v EUIPO — Erdmann & Rossi (Erdmann & Rossi)

6.3.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 70/22
            
         Action brought on 14 September 2016 — PJ v EUIPO — Erdmann & Rossi (Erdmann & Rossi)
   (Case T-664/16)
   (2017/C 070/31)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: PJ (represented by: B. Schürmann, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (Berlin, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Proprietor of the mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Mark at issue: EU word mark ‘Erdmann & Rossi’ — EU trade mark No 10 310 481
   
      Proceedings before EUIPO: Invalidity proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2016 in Case R 1670/2015-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO to pay the costs of the proceedings and the invalidity proceedings before the Board of Appeal and the Cancellation Division.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               infringement of Articles 52, 56, 63, 75 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009
            
         
               —
            
            
               infringement of Rules 50, 55 and 94 of Regulation No 2868/95;
            
         
               —
            
            
               infringement of Article 12 of Regulation No 216/96;
            
         
               —
            
            
               infringement of Article 6 ECHR;
            
         
               —
            
            
               infringement of Articles 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.