CELEX: 62015TN0512
Language: en
Date: 2015-09-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-512/15: Action brought on 4 September 2015 — Sun Cali v OHIM — Abercrombie & Fitch Europe (SUN CALI)

26.10.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 354/47
            
         Action brought on 4 September 2015 — Sun Cali v OHIM — Abercrombie & Fitch Europe (SUN CALI)
   (Case T-512/15)
   (2015/C 354/57)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Sun Cali, Inc. (Denver, United States) (represented by: C. Thomas, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Abercrombie & Fitch Europe SA (Mendrisio, Switzerland)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘SUN CALI’ — Community trade mark No 5 482 369
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 June 2015 in Cases R 1260/2014-5 and R 1281/2014-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Court and order the (potential) intervener to pay the costs of the administrative proceedings before the Board of Appeal;
            
         
               —
            
            
               set a date for an oral hearing for the case that findings of the General Court are not possible without an oral hearing.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 92(3) of Regulation No 207/2009 in Case T-1260/2014-5;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 in case T-1281/2014-5.