CELEX: 62019TA0277
Language: en
Date: 2021-03-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-277/19: Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — BK v EASO (Civil service — Temporary agents — Temporary reassignment — Action for annulment — Purely confirmatory measure — Inadmissibility — Explicit decision rejecting the complaint — Autonomous scope — Suspension of the effects of the decision subject to the complaint — Interest in bringing proceedings — Action for damages — Close link to the claim for annulment — No pre-litigation procedure — Inadmissibility)

7.6.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 217/37
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2021 — BK v EASO
      (Case T-277/19) (1)
      
      (Civil service - Temporary agents - Temporary reassignment - Action for annulment - Purely confirmatory measure - Inadmissibility - Explicit decision rejecting the complaint - Autonomous scope - Suspension of the effects of the decision subject to the complaint - Interest in bringing proceedings - Action for damages - Close link to the claim for annulment - No pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility)
      (2021/C 217/48)
      Language of the case: Greek
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: BK (represented by: V. Christianos, A. Skoulikis and D. Karagkounis, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Asylum Support Office (represented by: P. Eyckmans and A. Stamatopoulou, acting as Agents, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decision of EASO of 20 September 2018 to assign the applicant to Malta from 1 November 2018, of the implied decision rejecting the complaint directed against that decision and of the decision of EASO of 6 June 2019 explicitly rejecting that complaint and, second, compensation for the material and non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicant following that latter decision.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders BK to bear half of her own costs;
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  Orders the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) to bear its own costs and to pay half of the costs incurred by BK.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 213, 24.6.2019.