CELEX: 62006FA0064
Language: en
Date: 2010-07-08 00:00:00
Title: Case F-64/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — Bergström v Commission (Staff case — Appointment — Members of the temporary staff appointed as officials — Candidates names included on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional rules on grading upon recruitment — Grading pursuant to the new less favourable rules — Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

28.8.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 234/55
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 — Bergström v Commission
   (Case F-64/06) (1)
   
   (Staff case - Appointment - Members of the temporary staff appointed as officials - Candidates names included on a reserve list prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Transitional rules on grading upon recruitment - Grading pursuant to the new less favourable rules - Article 5(4) and Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)
   2010/C 234/99
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Ragnar Bergström (Linkebeek, Belgium) (represented by: initially, T. Bontinck and J. Feld, lawyers, and, subsequently, T. Bontinck and S. Woog, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and H. Krämer, agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Arpio Santacruz and I. Šulce, agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority of 10 August 2005 by which the applicant, a member of the temporary staff who was successful in open competition COM/A/3/02, was appointed as an official in Grade A*6, step 2, in accordance with the provisions of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the application.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders each party to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 165, 15.7.2006, p. 36.