CELEX: 62014TA0404
Language: en
Date: 2015-11-26 00:00:00
Title: Case T-404/14: Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2015 — Junited Autoglas Deutschland v OHIM — United Vehicles (UNITED VEHICLEs) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark UNITED VEHICLEs — Earlier Community word mark Junited — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

25.1.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 27/47
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 26 November 2015 — Junited Autoglas Deutschland v OHIM — United Vehicles (UNITED VEHICLEs)
   (Case T-404/14) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark UNITED VEHICLEs - Earlier Community word mark Junited - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   (2016/C 027/58)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: C. Weil, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: United Vehicles GmbH (Munich, Germany)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 April 2014 (Case R 859/2013-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG and United Vehicles GmbH.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Junited Autoglas Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 292, 1.9.2014.