CELEX: 62015CA0121
Language: en
Date: 2016-09-07 00:00:00
Title: Case C-121/15: Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Association nationale des opérateurs détaillants en énergie (ANODE) v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Économie, de l’Industrie et du Numérique, Commission de régulation de l’énergie, ENGIE, formerly GDF Suez (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Approximation of laws — Directive 2009/73/EC — Energy — Gas sector — Fixing of prices for supplying natural gas to final customers — Regulated tariffs — Obstacle — Compatibility — Criteria of assessment — Objectives of security of supply and territorial cohesion)

31.10.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 402/6
            
         Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Association nationale des opérateurs détaillants en énergie (ANODE) v Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Économie, de l’Industrie et du Numérique, Commission de régulation de l’énergie, ENGIE, formerly GDF Suez
   (Case C-121/15) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Directive 2009/73/EC - Energy - Gas sector - Fixing of prices for supplying natural gas to final customers - Regulated tariffs - Obstacle - Compatibility - Criteria of assessment - Objectives of security of supply and territorial cohesion))
   (2016/C 402/07)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Referring court
   
   Conseil d’État
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Association nationale des opérateurs détaillants en énergie (ANODE)
   
      Defendants: Premier ministre, Ministre de l’Économie, de l’Industrie et du Numérique, Commission de régulation de l’énergie, ENGIE, formerly GDF Suez
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Article 3(1) of Directive 2009/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 July 2009 concerning common rules for the internal market in natural gas and repealing Directive 2003/55/EC must be interpreted as meaning that intervention by a Member State consisting in requiring certain suppliers, including the incumbent supplier, to offer to supply natural gas to final consumers at regulated tariffs constitutes by its very nature an obstacle to the achievement of a competitive market in natural gas as provided for in that provision, and that obstacle exists even though the intervention does not preclude competing offers from being made at lower prices than those tariffs by any supplier in the market.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Article 3(2) of Directive 2009/73, read in the light of Articles 14 TFEU and 106 TFEU and Protocol (No 26) on services of general interest, annexed to the EU Treaty, as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon, and the FEU Treaty, must be interpreted as allowing the Member States to assess whether, in the general economic interest, public service obligations relating to the price of supply of natural gas should be imposed on undertakings operating in the gas sector, in order in particular to ensure security of supply and territorial cohesion, provided that, first, all the conditions set out in Article 3(2) of the directive are satisfied, specifically the non-discriminatory nature of such obligations, and, secondly, that the imposition of those obligations complies with the principle of proportionality.
               Article 3(2) of Directive 2009/73 must be interpreted as not precluding a method of determination of prices based on taking costs into consideration, provided that the application of the method does not have the consequence that the State intervention goes beyond what is necessary for achieving the objectives of general economic interest pursued.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 178, 1.6.2015.