CELEX: 62010TA0563
Language: en
Date: 2011-12-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-563/10 P: Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2011 — De Luca v Commission (Appeal — Cross-appeal — Staff case — Officials — Appointment to a post in a higher function group following an open competition — Entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Transitional provisions — Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

4.2.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 32/25
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2011 — De Luca v Commission
   (Case T-563/10 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Cross-appeal - Staff case - Officials - Appointment to a post in a higher function group following an open competition - Entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Transitional provisions - Article 12(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)
   2012/C 32/51
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Patrizia De Luca (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and S. Orlandi, lawyers)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall, Agent) and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and K. Zieleśkiewicz, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 in Case F-20/06 De Luca v Commission [2010] ECR I-0000, seeking to have that judgment set aside.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the cross-appeals.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 30 September 2010 in Case F-20/06 De Luca v Commission [2010] ECR I-0000.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Refers the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal.
            
         
               4.
            
            
               The costs are reserved
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 63, 26.2.2011.