CELEX: 62011CA0629
Language: en
Date: 2012-10-04 00:00:00
Title: Case C-629/11 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 October 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission (Appeal — Public contract awarded by the Commission — Rejection of the tender — Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 — Article 100(2) — Time-limit for replying to a request for information — Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 — Article 149(2))

24.11.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 366/16
            
         Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 4 October 2012 — Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Commission
   (Case C-629/11 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Public contract awarded by the Commission - Rejection of the tender - Obligation to state the reasons on which the decision is based - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 - Article 100(2) - Time-limit for replying to a request for information - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2342/2002 - Article 149(2))
   2012/C 366/27
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, dikigoros)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Calciu and S. Delaude, Agents, and P. Wytinck, advocaat)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 20 September 2011 in Case T-298/09 Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission dismissing an application first, for annulment of the Commission decision of 12 May 2009 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in response to call for tenders EAC/01/2008 for external service provision for educational programmes (ESP-ISEP) (OJ 2008/S 158-212752) and of the decision to award the contract to another tenderer and, second, for damages — Article 93(1)(f) of the Financial Regulation — Period of validity of tenders — Non-contractual liability
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the appeal;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 49, 18.2.2012.