CELEX: 62013TA0498
Language: en
Date: 2014-12-11 00:00:00
Title: Case T-498/13: Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014  — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Vincci Hoteles (NAMMU) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark NAMMU — Relative ground for refusal — Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark — Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Rule 22(2) to (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

2.2.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 34/37
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 11 December 2014 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v OHIM — Vincci Hoteles (NAMMU)
   (Case T-498/13) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark NAMMU - Relative ground for refusal - Proof of genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Rule 22(2) to (4) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))
   (2015/C 034/43)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: A. Nordemann, T. Boddien, and M. Maier, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Vincci Hoteles SA (Alcobendas, Spain)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 June 2013 (Case R 611/2012-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Vincci Hoteles SA.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.