CELEX: 62019TB0597
Language: en
Date: 2020-03-13 00:00:00
Title: Case T-597/19 R: Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin kaupunki v Commission (Application for interim measures — State aid — Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery — Application for suspension of operation of a measure — No urgency)

8.6.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 191/17
            
         
      Order of the President of the General Court of 13 March 2020 — Helsingin kaupunki v Commission
      (Case T-597/19 R)
      (Application for interim measures - State aid - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency)
      (2020/C 191/23)
      Language of the case: Finnish
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Helsingin kaupunki (Finland) (represented by: I. Aalto-Setälä, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: M. Huttunen and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)
      
         Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Finland (represented by: J. Heliskoski, acting as Agent)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking suspension of operation of Commission Decision C(2019) 3152 final of 28 June 2019 relating to State aid SA.33846 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2011/CP) implemented by Finland for Helsingin Bussiliikenne Oy.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The application for interim measures is dismissed.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  The order of 19 September 2019, Helsingin kaupunki v Commission (T-597/19 R, not published) is set aside.
                  
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene of Nobina Oy and of Nobina AB or the application for confidentiality made by Helsingin kaupunki.
               
            
                  4.
               
               
                  The costs are reserved, except for those incurred by Nobina Oy and Nobina AB, which shall bear their own costs relating to their application for leave to intervene in the proceedings for interim measures.