CELEX: 62010TB0236
Language: en
Date: 2012-03-29 00:00:00
Title: Case T-236/10: Order of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Asociación Española de Banca v European Commission (Actions for annulment — State aid — Aid schemes allowing for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions — Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of aid — Association — Lack of individual concern — Inadmissibility)

26.5.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 151/28
            
         Order of the General Court of 29 March 2012 — Asociación Española de Banca v European Commission
   (Case T-236/10) (1)
   
   (Actions for annulment - State aid - Aid schemes allowing for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of aid - Association - Lack of individual concern - Inadmissibility)
   2012/C 151/46
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Asociación Española de Banca (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal and C. Urraca Caviedes, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of Article 1(1) and, alternatively, Article 4 of Commission Decision 2011/5/EC of 28 October 2009 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 7, p. 48).
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Asociación Española de Banca is to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 195, 17.7.2010.