CELEX: 62014CA0120
Language: en
Date: 2015-04-22 00:00:00
Title: Case C-120/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2015 — Christoph Klein v European Commission (Appeal — Non-contractual liability — Directive 93/42/EEC — Articles 8 and 18 — Medical devices — Inaction by the Commission following notification of a decision to prohibit placing on the market — Limitation period — Suspensory effect of an application for legal aid on the limitation period — Safeguard clause procedure)

22.6.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 205/11
            
         Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 22 April 2015 — Christoph Klein v European Commission
   (Case C-120/14 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Non-contractual liability - Directive 93/42/EEC - Articles 8 and 18 - Medical devices - Inaction by the Commission following notification of a decision to prohibit placing on the market - Limitation period - Suspensory effect of an application for legal aid on the limitation period - Safeguard clause procedure))
   (2015/C 205/15)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Christoph Klein (represented by: H. Ahlt and M. Ahlt, Rechtsanwälte)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos and G. von Rintelen, acting as Agents)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union in Klein v Commission (T-309/10, EU:T:2014:19) in so far as, by that judgment, the General Court dismissed the action in that it sought that the European Commission be ordered to pay compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by Mr Christoph Klein from 15 September 2006;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               dismisses the appeal as to the remainder;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;
            
         
               4.
            
            
               reserves the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 184, 16.06.2014.