CELEX: 62017CA0589
Language: en
Date: 2019-07-29 00:00:00
Title: Case C-589/17: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña — Spain) — Prenatal S.A. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Import of textile products wrongly declared as originating from Jamaica — Post-clearance recovery of import duties — Application for remission — Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 — Community Customs Code — Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 — European Commission’s decision to refuse in a particular case — Validity)

23.9.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 319/9
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 29 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña — Spain) — Prenatal S.A. v Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC)
      (Case C-589/17) (1)
      
      (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Import of textile products wrongly declared as originating from Jamaica - Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Application for remission - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Community Customs Code - Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 - European Commission’s decision to refuse in a particular case - Validity)
      (2019/C 319/08)
      Language of the case: Spanish
      
         Referring court
      
      Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cataluña
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Prenatal S.A.
      
         Defendant: Tribunal Económico Administrativo Regional de Cataluña (TEARC)
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The consideration of Commission Decision C(2008) 6317 final of 3 November 2008 finding that post-clearance entry in the accounts of import duties is justified and remission of those duties is not justified in a particular case (Case REM 03/07), in the light of Article 220(2)(b) and Article 239 of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Regulation (EC) No 2700/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November 2000, revealed no factor of such a kind as to affect the validity of that decision.
      
         (1)  OJ C 22, 22.1.2018.