CELEX: C2006/212/50
Language: en
Date: 2006-09-02 00:00:00
Title: Case T-88/04: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 July 2006 — Tzirani v Commission (Officials — Promotion — Filling an A2 post — Rejection of candidature — Failure to state reasons — Manifest error of assessment — Infringement of the rules for appointment of officials at grade A1 and A2)

2.9.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 212/28
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 4 July 2006 — Tzirani v Commission
   (Case T-88/04) (1)
   
   (Officials - Promotion - Filling an A2 post - Rejection of candidature - Failure to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Infringement of the rules for appointment of officials at grade A1 and A2)
   (2006/C 212/50)
   Language of the case: French
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Marie Tzirani (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: É. Boigelot, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: G. Berscheid and V. Joris, Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
   Re:
   Application for annulment of the decision of the Commission of 23 May 2003 to reject the applicant's candidature for the A2 grade post of Director of the ‘Social policy, Luxembourg staff, health and safety’ Directorate in the ‘Personnel and Administration’ Directorate-General of the Commission; an application for annulment of the decision of the Commission of 21 May 2003 to appoint Ms D.S. for that post and, if necessary, an application for annulment of the implied rejection of the applicant's complaint against those two decisions
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the Commission to appoint Mme D.S. for the post concerned in the vacancy COM/063/03 and also the decision to reject the candidature of the applicant for that post.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Dismisses the remainder of the application.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 106 of 30.4.2004