CELEX: 62012TA0353
Language: en
Date: 2013-05-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-353/12: Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2013 — Aleris v OHIM — Carefusion 303 (ALARIS) (Community trade mark — Revocation proceedings — Community word mark ALARIS — Genuine use of the mark — Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

29.6.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 189/22
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2013 — Aleris v OHIM — Carefusion 303 (ALARIS)
   (Case T-353/12) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Revocation proceedings - Community word mark ALARIS - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2013/C 189/44
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Aleris Holding AB (Stockholm, Sweden) (represented by: A. Kylhammar and K. Westerberg, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Carefusion 303, Inc. (San Diego, California, United States)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 May 2012 (Case R 334/2011-5) relating to revocation proceedings between Aleris Holding AB and Carefusion 303, Inc.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 11 May 2002 (Case R 334/2011-5) in so far as it rejects the application for revocation of the trade mark ALARIS in respect of the goods falling within Class 10 other than infusion systems, syringe pumps, volumetric pumps, controllers, thermometers and disposable thermometers;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders each party to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.