CELEX: C2005/182/58
Language: en
Date: 2005-07-23 00:00:00
Title: Case C-230/05 P: Appeal brought on 26 May 2005 by L against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2005 in Case T-254/02 L v Commission of the European Communities

23.7.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 182/33
            
         Appeal brought on 26 May 2005 by L against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2005 in Case T-254/02 L v Commission of the European Communities
   (Case C-230/05 P)
   (2005/C 182/58)
   Language of the case: French
   An appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities (Fourth Chamber) of 9 March 2005 in Case T-254/02 L v Commission of the European Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Communities on 26 May 2005 by L, represented by P. Legros and S. Rodrigues, avocats.
   The appellant claims that the Court should:
   
               1.
            
            
               set aside the contested judgment of the Court of First Instance of the European Communities of 9 March 2005 in Case T-254/02;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               uphold the claims for annulment and compensation made at first instance;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               order the defendant to pay all the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   The contested judgment:
   
               —
            
            
               first, infringed the rights of the defence and the interests of the applicant, in that the Court of First Instance committed several procedural irregularities and made several manifest errors of assessment and vitiated the contested judgment by not stating reasons, and
            
         
               —
            
            
               second, infringed Community law by not drawing any consequences from the breach by the defendant of its obligations concerning the transmission of correspondence to its staff and the treatment within a reasonable time of its staff's affairs, by virtue of the general principle of sound administration.