CELEX: 62010FN0065
Language: en
Date: 2010-08-06 00:00:00
Title: Case F-65/10: Action brought on 6 August 2010 — Mata Blanco v Commission

23.10.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 288/73
            
         
      Action brought on 6 August 2010 — Mata Blanco v Commission
      (Case F-65/10)
      ()
      (2010/C 288/138)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: José Manuel Mata Blanco (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission
      
         Subject-matter and description of the proceedings
      
      Annulment of the EPSO decision not to include the applicant on the reserve list for internal competition ‘COM/INT/OLAF.09/AD10 — Administrators specialised in anti-fraud’ and the reserve list and all the decisions taken on the basis of that list
      
         Form of order sought
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the EPSO decision of 11 May 2010 confirming, after re-examination, its decision of 9 March 2010 not to include the applicant on the reserve list for internal competition ‘COM/INT/OLAF/09/AD10 — Administrators specialised in anti-fraud’;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul the reserve list for internal competition ‘COM/INT/OLAF/09/AD10 — Administrators specialised in anti-fraud’ in so far as it does not include the applicant’s name and all other decision taken on the basis of that list;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order, as measures of organisation of procedure (cf. Article 55 of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court), the production by the defendant of the criteria used by the jury for the oral test, the questions put to him by the competition jury during his oral test and the copy of the jury’s assessment sheet relating to that oral test together with the criteria used in their marking.