CELEX: C2002/156/25
Language: en
Date: 2002-06-29 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of 20 March 2002 in Case T-15/99, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (Competition — Cartel — District heating pipes — Article 85 of the EC Treaty (now Article 81 EC) — Boycott — fine — Guidelines on setting fines — Non-retroactivity — Legitimate expectation)

C 156/14                 EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                     29.6.2002
4.    Orders the Commission to bear 20 % of its own costs, including                          JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
      those relating to the interlocutory proceedings.
                                                                                                     of 20 March 2002
(1) OJ C 86 of 27.3.1999.
                                                                            in Case T-16/99, Lögstör Rör (Deutschland) GmbH v
                                                                                    Commission of the European Communities (1)
                                                                            (Competition — Cartel — District heating pipes —
                                                                            Article 85 of the EC Treaty (now Article 81 EC) — Boycott
                  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT                                     — Access to the file — Fine — Guidelines on the method of
                                                                            setting fines — Non-retroactivity — Legitimate expec-
                                                                                                           tations)
                          of 20 March 2002
in Case T-15/99, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH v Com-
          mission of the European Communities (1)                                                     (2002/C 156/26)
(Competition — Cartel — District heating pipes —
Article 85 of the EC Treaty (now Article 81 EC) — Boycott                                      (Language of the case: German)
— fine — Guidelines on setting fines — Non-retroactivity
                    — Legitimate expectation)
                           (2002/C 156/25)
                   (Language of the case: German)                           In Case T-16/99, Lögstör Rör (Deutschland) GmbH, established
                                                                            in Fulda (Germany), represented by H.-J. Hellmann and T. Näg-
                                                                            ele, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
                                                                            Commission of the European Communities (Agents: W. Mölls
In Case T-15/99, Brugg Rohrsysteme GmbH, established in                     and E. Gippini Fournier) — application for, primarily, annul-
Wunstorf (Germany), represented by T. Jestaedt, H.-C. Salger                ment of Commission Decision 1999/60/EC of 21 October
and M. Sura, lawyers, with an address for service in Luxem-                 1998 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EC
bourg, against Commission of the European Communities                       Treaty (Case No IV/35.691/E-4: — Pre-Insulated Pipe Cartel)
(Agents: W. Mölls and É. Gippini Fournier) — application for               (OJ 1999 L 24, p. 1) or, in the alternative, reduction of the fine
annulment of Commission Decision 1999/60/EC of 21 Octo-                     imposed on the applicant by that decision — the Court of
ber 1998 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EC                First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of P. Mengozzi,
Treaty (Case No IV/35.691/E-4: — Pre-Insulated Pipe Cartel)                 President, V. Tiili, and R.M. Moura Ramos, Judges; B. Pastor,
(OJ 1999 L 24, p. 1) or, in the alternative, for reduction of the           Principle Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment
fine imposed on the applicant by that decision — the Court of               on 20 March 2002, in which it:
First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of P. Mengozzi,
President, V. Tiili and R.M. Moura Ramos, Judges; G. Herzig,
Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on
20 March 2002, in which it:                                                 1.     Dismisses the application;
1.    Dismisses the application;
                                                                            2.     Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
2.    Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
                                                                            (1) OJ C 86 of 27.3.1999.
(1) OJ C 86 of 27.3.1999.