CELEX: 62018CA0605
Language: en
Date: 2021-09-09 00:00:00
Title: Case C-605/18: Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — Adler Real Estate AG, Petrus Advisers LLP, GM v Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA) (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Securities admitted to trading on a regulated market situated or operating within a Member State — Transparency requirement — Notification of ‘major holdings’ acquired in companies by ‘persons acting in concert’ — Directive 2004/109/EC — Article 3(1a), fourth subparagraph — Concept of ‘more stringent requirements’ — Directive 2004/25/EC — ‘Supervision’ by an authority appointed pursuant to Article 4 of that directive)

15.11.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 462/7
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 9 September 2021 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — Adler Real Estate AG, Petrus Advisers LLP, GM v Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA)
      (Case C-605/18) (1)
      
      (Reference for a preliminary ruling - Securities admitted to trading on a regulated market situated or operating within a Member State - Transparency requirement - Notification of ‘major holdings’ acquired in companies by ‘persons acting in concert’ - Directive 2004/109/EC - Article 3(1a), fourth subparagraph - Concept of ‘more stringent requirements’ - Directive 2004/25/EC - ‘Supervision’ by an authority appointed pursuant to Article 4 of that directive)
      (2021/C 462/04)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Referring court
      
      Bundesverwaltungsgericht
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicants: Adler Real Estate AG, Petrus Advisers LLP, GM
      
         Defendant: Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA)
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      Article 3(1a), fourth subparagraph, (iii), of Directive 2004/109/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 December 2004 on the harmonisation of transparency requirements in relation to information about issuers whose securities are admitted to trading on a regulated market and amending Directive 2001/34/EC, as amended by Directive 2013/50/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013, must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State which, first, makes shareholders, or natural persons or legal entities referred to in Article 10 or 13 of Directive 2004/109, as amended by Directive 2013/50, subject to requirements relating to notification of major holdings that are more stringent, within the meaning of that fourth subparagraph, than those provided for in Directive 2004/109, as amended by Directive 2013/50, and those more stringent requirements result from laws, regulations or administrative provisions adopted in relation, inter alia, to takeover bids; and, secondly, does not assign the power to ensure compliance with such requirements to an authority of that Member State appointed pursuant to Article 4 of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids.
      
         (1)  OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.