CELEX: 62020TN0586
Language: en
Date: 2020-09-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-586/20: Action brought on 24 September 2020 — MN v Europol

14.12.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 433/55
            
         
      Action brought on 24 September 2020 — MN v Europol
      (Case T-586/20)
      (2020/C 433/69)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: MN (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: The European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (Europol)
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the decision of 6 March 2020 not to renew the applicant’s contract for an indefinite period;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order Europol to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 25 000 for the non-material harm suffered by the applicant as a result of the contested decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order Europol to pay the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging illegality of the criterion used to justify the non-renewal of the applicant’s contract for an indefinite period, in that it does not allow the interests of the service to be identified.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, in the alternative, alleging multiple manifest errors of assessment vitiating the contested decision.