CELEX: 62019TN0114
Language: en
Date: 2019-02-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-114/19: Action brought on 20 February 2019 — Pavel v EUIPO — bugatti (B)

24.6.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 213/39
            
         
      Action brought on 20 February 2019 — Pavel v EUIPO — bugatti (B)
      (Case T-114/19)
      (2019/C 213/41)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Dan-Gabriel Pavel (Oradea, Romania) (represented by: E. Nedelcu, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: bugatti GmbH (Herford, Germany)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
      
         Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark B — European Union trade mark No 13 545 181
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 December 2018 in related Cases R 49/2018-1 and R 85/2018-1
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision and maintain the trade mark EUTM-013545181 validly registered as it was registered on 05/05/2016 for all the goods and services;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order EUIPO to pay the judicial costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Inapplicability of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Absence of proof concerning the breach of the public interest.