CELEX: 62013TN0524
Language: en
Date: 2013-09-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-524/13: Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Euromed v OHIM — DC Druck-Chemie (EUROSIL)

30.11.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 352/21
            
         Action brought on 20 September 2013 — Euromed v OHIM — DC Druck-Chemie (EUROSIL)
   (Case T-524/13)
   2013/C 352/40
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Euromed, SA (Mollet del Vallès, Spain) (represented by: E. Sugrañes Coca, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: DC Druck-Chemie GmbH (Ammerbuch-Altingen, Germany)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 27 June 2013 given in Case R 1829/2012-1; and
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘EUROSIL’ for certain goods in Class 1 — Community trade mark application No 8 540 049
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The applicant
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: The word mark ‘EUROSIL-85’ for goods in Class 5 — Community registration No 6 140 099 and the word mark ‘EUROSIL-85’ for goods in Class 5 — Spanish registration No 2 785 209
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejected the opposition in its entirety
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8 (1)(b) CTMR.