CELEX: 62015TN0144
Language: en
Date: 2015-03-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-144/15: Action brought on 25 March 2015 — L'Oréal v OHIM — Theralab (VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA)

26.5.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 171/34
            
         Action brought on 25 March 2015 — L'Oréal v OHIM — Theralab (VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA)
   (Case T-144/15)
   (2015/C 171/40)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: L'Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: J. Sena Mioludo, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Theralab — Produtos Farmacêuticos e Nutracêuticos, Lda (Viseu, Portugal)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA’ — Application for registration No 11 074 391
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2015 in Case R 1097/2014-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 26 February 2014 in Opposition B 002139916;
            
         
               —
            
            
               reject the opposition B 002139916;
            
         
               —
            
            
               accept the community Trademark Application No 011074391 ‘VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA (+fig.)’ in its entirety;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      Plea(s) in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.