CELEX: 62016TN0015
Language: en
Date: 2016-01-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-15/16: Action brought on 14 January 2016 — Pandalis v OHIM– LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus)

7.3.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 90/25
            
         Action brought on 14 January 2016 — Pandalis v OHIM– LR Health & Beauty Systems (Cystus)
   (Case T-15/16)
   (2016/C 090/33)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Georgios Pandalis (Glandorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Franke, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: LR Health & Beauty Systems GmbH (Ahlen, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Cystus’ — Community mark No 1 273 119
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Invalidity proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 October 2015 in Case R 2839/2014-1
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision relating to Invalidity proceedings No 8374 C and Community mark No 1 273 119 ‘Cystus’;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 64(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Article 51(1)(a) and (2) thereof;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Misuse of powers;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009.