CELEX: 62020TN0435
Language: en
Date: 2020-07-07 00:00:00
Title: Case T-435/20: Action brought on 7 July 2020 — JR v Commission

7.9.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 297/44
            
         
      Action brought on 7 July 2020 — JR v Commission
      (Case T-435/20)
      (2020/C 297/57)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: JR (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  declare the present action admissible and well founded;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  consequently:
                  
                              —
                           
                           
                              annul the decision of 15 April 2020 in that it rejects the applicant’s request for review of the decision of the competition selection board of 16 December 2019 not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list for internal competition COM/03/AD/18 (AD6) — 1 — Administrators, and, if needed, annul that decision of 16 December 2019;
                           
                        
                              —
                           
                           
                              order the defendant to pay the costs.
                           
                        
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging manifest error of assessment and breach of the rules governing the proceedings of the selection board.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the obligation to state reasons and breach of the principle of good administration.