CELEX: C2000/247/32
Language: en
Date: 2000-08-26 00:00:00
Title: Case C-252/00: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil Mixte d'Appel d'Expression Française de l'Ordre des Médecins Vétérinaires by a decision of 10 June 2000 in the case of Dr Jean-Michel Vandeweerd

26.8.2000              EN                     Official Journal of the European Communities                                           C 247/23
that the particular legislation constitutes discrimination incom-        ‘Does Regulation 2200/96 (1) (and did Regulation 1035/72 (2)
patible with the Treaty in the field of the free movement of             when it was in force) give rise to a legal duty resting upon
capital (Article 56 EC, ex Article 73b).                                 persons who trade in a fruit or a vegetable within the
                                                                         Community to comply with the requirements as regards
                                                                         variety name laid down by a quality standard which is
                                                                         applicable to that fruit or vegetable, which a national court
                                                                         should enforce in civil proceedings brought at the suit of a
                                                                         person who is a substantial grower within the Community of
                                                                         the fruit or vegetable concerned?’
Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil Mixte
d’Appel d’Expression Française de l’Ordre des Médecins
Vétérinaires by a decision of 10 June 2000 in the case of                (1) of the Council of 28 October 1996 on the common organization
                                                                             of the market in fruit and vegetables (OJ L 297, 21.11.1996, p. 1).
                 Dr Jean-Michel Vandeweerd
                                                                         (2) OJ L 118, 20.5.1972, p. 1.
                         (Case C-252/00)
                         (2000/C 247/32)
Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
European Communities by a decision of the Conseil Mixte
d’Appel d’Expression Française de l’Ordre des Médecins Vétéri-
naires (French language Joint Appeal Board of the Association
of Veterinary Surgeons, Belgium) of 10 June 2000, which was
received at the Court Registry on 26 June 2000, for a
preliminary ruling in the case of Dr Jean-Michel Vandeweerd.
The Conseil Mixte d’Appel d’Expression Française de l’Ordre
des Médecins Vétérinaires asks the Court of Justice to rule on           Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunale di
the following question:                                                  Trento — Special Section — by order of that court of
                                                                         6 June 2000 in the case of Grundig Italiana SpA against
                                                                                              Ministero delle Finanze
On a proper construction, does Article 85 of the EC Treaty
prohibit the ban on advertising laid down by the Upper
Council of the Association of Veterinary Surgeons in the 1983                                       (Case C-255/00)
Code of Conduct, in particular in so far as the Code does not
allow objective information to be given in a professional
context about an artificial insemination centre for horses run                                      (2000/C 247/34)
by a veterinary surgeon?
                                                                         Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
                                                                         European Communities by order of the Tribunale di Trento
                                                                         (District Court, Trento) of 6 June 2000, received at the Court
                                                                         Registry on 26 June 2000, for a preliminary ruling in the case
                                                                         of Grundig Italiana SpA against Ministero delle Finanze
                                                                         (Ministry of Finance) on the following question:
Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Court of Appeal
(England & Wales) (Civil Division, by order of that court
of 14 June 2000, in the case of 1) Antonio Muñoz y Cia                  ‘Is a national provision, namely the last part of Article 29(1)
SA and 2) Superior Fruiticola SA against 1) Frumar Ltd                   of Law No 428 of 29 December 1990, compatible with
          and 2) Redbridge Produce Marketing Ltd                         Community law and in particular with the often stated
                                                                         principle of effectiveness (inter alia, Case C-343/1996 Dilex-
                                                                         port, Case C-260/1996 Spac, Case C-231/1996 Edis, Case
                         (Case C-253/00)
                                                                         C-228/1996 Aprile, Case C-261/1995 Palmisani) where it lays
                                                                         down a period of grace of 90 days within which, in order to
                         (2000/C 247/33)                                 avoid the three-year time-limit introduced retroactively in
                                                                         place of a previous five-year limitation period, a party enjoying
Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the                   a right to recover a sum paid but not due resulting from a
European Communities by an order of the Court of Appeal                  payment made prior to the entry into force of the said
(England & Wales) (Civil Division) of 14 June 2000, which was            provision must bring a legal action?’
received at the Court Registry on 26 June 2000, for a
preliminary ruling in the case of 1) Antonio Muñoz y Cia SA
and 2) Superior Fruiticola SA against 1) Frumar Ltd and 2)
Redbridge Produce Marketing Ltd, on the following question: