CELEX: 62014TN0464
Language: en
Date: 2014-06-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-464/14 P: Appeal brought on 20 June 2014 by Risto Nieminen against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 April 2014 in Case F-81/12, Nieminen v Council

11.8.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 261/45
            
         Appeal brought on 20 June 2014 by Risto Nieminen against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 10 April 2014 in Case F-81/12, Nieminen v Council
   
   (Case T-464/14 P)
   2014/C 261/71
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Risto Nieminen (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by M. de Abreu Caldas, D. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union
   
      Form of order sought by the appellant
   
   The appellant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               set aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 10 April 2014 in Case F-81/12 (Risto Nieminen v Council);
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Council to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The appellant relies on two grounds of appeal.
   
               1.
            
            
               First ground of appeal: infringement of the rights of the defence, in so far as the Civil Service Tribunal found that the appellant had failed to adduce sufficient evidence to show that there had been a manifest error of assessment, even though it was aware that the appellant was not really in a position to do so and despite its refusal to compel the defendant at first instance to produce all the documents relevant for the purposes of determining whether that plea was well founded.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second ground of appeal: distortion of the evidence and the facts.