CELEX: 62006FA0126
Language: en
Date: 2010-07-08 00:00:00
Title: Case F-126/06: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 Magazzu v Commission (Staff cases — Officials — Appointment — Members of the temporary staff appointed as officials — Candidates’ names included on a reserve list of a competition published prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations — Grading pursuant to the new less favourable rules — Acquired rights — Principle of non-discrimination — Articles 2, 5 and 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)

11.9.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 246/40
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Second Chamber) of 8 July 2010 Magazzu v Commission
   (Case F-126/06) (1)
   
   (Staff cases - Officials - Appointment - Members of the temporary staff appointed as officials - Candidates’ names included on a reserve list of a competition published prior to the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations - Grading pursuant to the new less favourable rules - Acquired rights - Principle of non-discrimination - Articles 2, 5 and 12 of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations)
   2010/C 246/68
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Salvatore Magazzu (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially T. Bontinck and J. Feld, lawyers, and subsequently T. Bontinck and S. Woog, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and G. Berscheid, agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the decision of the Appointing Authority of 13 December 2005 by which the applicant, a temporary agent in Grade A*11 who was successful in open competition COM/A/18/04, was appointed as an official with classification in Grade A*6, step 2, in accordance with Annex XIII of the Staff Regulations.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the application.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders each party to bear their own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 310, 16.12.2006, p. 32.