CELEX: 62009CJ0465
Language: en
Date: 2011-06-09
Title: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011. # Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya - Diputación Foral de Vizcaya (C-465/09 P and C-468/09 P), Territorio Histórico de Álava - Diputación Foral de Álava (C-466/09 P and C-469/09 P) and Territorio Histórico de Guipúzcoa - Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa (C-467/09 P and C-470/09 P) v European Commission. # Appeals - State aid - Action for annulment - Decision initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC - Subsequent final decisions finding that State aid schemes implemented by Spain in 1993 for certain newly established firms in Álava, Vizcaya and Guipúzcoa were not compatible with the common market - Corporation tax exemptions - Lis pendens - Concept of 'authorised aid' - Legitimate expectations - Compliance with a reasonable time-limit - No notification. # Joined cases C-465/09 P to C-470/09 P.

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 9 June 2011 – Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya – Diputación Foral de Vizcaya and Others
            v Commission
      (Joined Cases C-465/09 P to C-470/09 P)
      Appeal – State aid – Action for annulment – Decision initiating the formal investigation procedure under Article 88(2) EC – Subsequent final decisions finding State aid schemes implemented by Spain in 1993 for certain newly established firms in
         the provinces of Álava, Vizcaya and Guipúzcoa incompatible with the common market – Exemption from corporation tax – Lis pendens – Concept of ‘authorised aid’ – Legitimate expectations – Observance of a reasonable time-limit – Not notified
      
      1.                     Appeals – Grounds – Challenge, repeating the pleas in law and arguments raised before the General Court, to the latter’s interpretation
            or application of Union law – Admissibility (Art. 256(1), second para., TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first
            para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 112(1)(c)) (see paras 78-79, 82)
      2.                     Procedure – Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings – Conditions – New plea – Definition (Rules of Procedure of the
            General Court, Art. 48(2)) (see para. 84)
      3.                     State aid – Existing aid and new aid – Classification as existing aid – Criteria – Unnotified aid measures – Authorisation
            by reason solely of the Commission’s silence – Not included (Art. 88(3) EC; Council Regulation No 659/1999, Art. 1(b)(ii))
            (see paras 90-91, 94-97)
      4.                     Appeals – Grounds – Review by the Court of the General Court’s refusal to order measures of inquiry – Scope (Rules of Procedure
            of the General Court, Art. 66(1)) (see paras 108-110)
      5.                     State aid – Examination by the Commission – Compatibility of the aid with the common market – Assessment of the compatibility
            of unnotified aid with regard to guidelines adopted after the aid had been paid – No breach of the principle of legal certainty
            – No breach of the principle of non-retroactivity (Arts 87 EC and 88 EC; Commission Communication 98/C 74/06) (see paras 120-128)
      6.                     State aid – Recovery of unlawful aid – Aid granted in breach of the procedural rules under Article 88 EC – Legitimate expectations
            possibly entertained by the recipients – Protection – Conditions and limits – No action taken by the Commission for a relatively
            long period – National authorities in breach of their duty to cooperate with the Commission – No legitimate expectations (Arts
            87 EC and 88 EC) (see paras 150-156, 162-163)
      7.                     Appeals – Grounds – Grounds of a judgment marred by infringement of Union law – Operative part well founded for other legal
            reasons – Rejection (see para. 171)
      Re:
      
         Appeal against the judgment of the Court of First Instance (Fifth Chamber, Extended Composition) of 9 September 2009 in Cases
                  T‑30/01 to T‑32/01 and T‑86/02 to T‑88/02 
               
               Diputación Foral de Álava and Others
                v 
               Commission
               , by which that court held, in Cases T‑30/01 to T‑32/01, that there was no longer any need to adjudicate on an application
                  for annulment of the Commission Decision of 28 November 2000 to initiate the procedure under Article 88(2) EC in relation
                  to the tax advantages in the form of corporation tax exemption for certain newly established firms granted by provisions adopted
                  by the Diputación Foral de Álava, the Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa and the Diputación Foral de Vizcaya, in the form of corporation
                  tax exemption for certain newly established firms and, in Cases T‑86/02 to T‑88/02, dismissed an application for annulment
                  of Commission Decisions 2003/28/EC, 2003/86/EC and 2003/192/EC of 20 December 2001 on a State aid scheme in the form of corporation
                  tax exemption implemented by Spain in 1993 for certain newly established firms in Álava (T‑86/02), Vizcaya (T‑87/02) and Guipúzcoa
                  (T‑88/02) (OJ 2003 L 17, p. 20, OJ 2003 L 40, p. 11, and OJ 2003 L 77, p. 1, respectively).
               
            Operative part
      The Court: 
      
         
                  1.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Dismisses the appeals; 
               
            
         
                  2.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Orders the Territorio Histórico de Vizcaya – Diputación Foral de Vizcaya, the Territorio Histórico de Álava – Diputación Foral
                     de Álava and the Territorio Histórico de Guipúzcoa – Diputación Foral de Guipúzcoa to pay in equal shares the costs relating
                     to the present appeals; 
                  
               
            
         
                  3.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.