CELEX: 62016CA0227
Language: en
Date: 2017-11-09 00:00:00
Title: Case C-227/16: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 November 2017 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwaarden — Netherlands) — Jan Theodorus Arts v Veevoederbedrijf Alpuro BV (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Agriculture — Common agricultural policy — Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 — Single payment scheme — Veal farmer who concluded an integration contract — Contractual term under which the single payment is payable to the integration undertaking — Whether permissible)

8.1.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 5/9
            
         Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 November 2017 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwaarden — Netherlands) — Jan Theodorus Arts v Veevoederbedrijf Alpuro BV
   (Case C-227/16) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Agriculture - Common agricultural policy - Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 - Single payment scheme - Veal farmer who concluded an integration contract - Contractual term under which the single payment is payable to the integration undertaking - Whether permissible))
   (2018/C 005/11)
   Language of the case: Dutch
   
      Referring court
   
   Gerechtshof Arnhem-Leeuwaarden
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Jan Theodorus Arts
   
      Defendant: Veevoederbedrijf Alpuro BV
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Council Regulation (EC) No 73/2009 of 19 January 2009 establishing common rules for direct support schemes for farmers under the common agricultural policy and establishing certain support schemes for farmers, amending Regulations (EC) No 1290/2005, (EC) No 247/2006, (EC) No 378/2007 and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1782/2003, must be interpreted as not precluding a contractual term under which the amount of aid which a veal farmer is entitled to claim under the single payment scheme is payable to an integration undertaking in the case where the transfer of that aid takes place within the context of reciprocal benefits and obligations negotiated between the parties to the contract.
   
      (1)  OJ C 279, 01.08.2016.