CELEX: 62017CA0238
Language: en
Date: 2018-11-14 00:00:00
Title: Case C-238/17: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas — Lithuania) — UAB ‘Renerga’ v AB ‘Energijos skirstymo operatorius’, AB ‘Lietuvos energijos gamyba’ (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Directive 2009/72/EC — Article 3(2), (6) and (15) and Article 36(f) — Internal market in electricity — Hypothetical nature of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling)

14.1.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 16/10
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 14 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas — Lithuania) — UAB ‘Renerga’ v AB ‘Energijos skirstymo operatorius’, AB ‘Lietuvos energijos gamyba’
      (Case C-238/17) (1)
      
      ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2009/72/EC - Article 3(2), (6) and (15) and Article 36(f) - Internal market in electricity - Hypothetical nature of the questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Inadmissibility of the request for a preliminary ruling))
      (2019/C 16/12)
      Language of the case: Lithuanian
      
         Referring court
      
      Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: UAB ‘Renerga’
      
         Defendants: AB ‘Energijos skirstymo operatorius’, AB ‘Lietuvos energijos gamyba’
      
         Third parties: UAB ‘BALTPOOL’, Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybė, Achema AB, Achemos Grupė UAB
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The request for a preliminary ruling from the Vilniaus miesto apylinkės teismas (District Court, City of Vilnius, Lithuania), made by decision of 11 April 2017, is inadmissible.
      
         (1)  OJ C 231, 17.7.2017.