CELEX: C2006/326/157
Language: en
Date: 2006-12-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-331/06: Action brought on 24 November 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EEA

30.12.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 326/77
            
         Action brought on 24 November 2006 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v EEA
   (Case T-331/06)
   (2006/C 326/157)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis and N. Keramidas, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Environment Agency
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the EEA to evaluate the applicant's bid as not successful and award the contract to the successful contractor;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the EEA to pay the applicant's legal and other costs and expenses incurred in connection with this application, even if the current application is rejected.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   In support of its claims the applicant argues that in the decision taken in the framework of the tendering procedure EEA/IDS/06/002 for the ‘Provision of IT consultancy services’ (OJ 2006 S 118-125101) communicated to the applicant by letter dated 14 September 2006 the European Environmental Agency (‘EEA’) failed to comply with its obligations foreseen in the Implementing rules and Directive 2004/18/EC as well as the principle of transparency by not disclosing to the participants in advance the weighting of the sub-criteria which were subsequently applied during the selection procedure.
   Furthermore, the applicant claims that the EEA committed several manifest errors of assessment which resulted in the rejection of its bid.
   The applicant requests that the decision of the EEA to reject its bid and award the contract to three other participants be annulled and that the defendant is ordered by the Court to pay all legal expenses related to the present proceedings even if the application is rejected.