CELEX: 62017TN0314
Language: en
Date: 2017-05-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-314/17: Action brought on 23 May 2017 — Nosio v EUIPO (MEZZA)

17.7.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 231/50
            
         Action brought on 23 May 2017 — Nosio v EUIPO (MEZZA)
   (Case T-314/17)
   (2017/C 231/65)
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Nosio SpA (Mezzocorona, Italy) (represented by: A. Perani and J. Graffer, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU word mark ‘MEZZA’ — Application for registration No 14 822 506
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 March 2017 in Case R 1518/2016-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               establish that there has been an infringement and incorrect application of Article 43(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               declare valid the limitation proposed in Class 33, namely ‘alcoholic beverages, in particular wine and sparkling wine, in bottles and/or containers with a capacity greater than or less than 0,375 litres’;
            
         
               —
            
            
               determine that there has been an infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO in Case R 1518/2016-5, delivered on 1 March 2017 and notified on 23 March 2017;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO to pay the costs and fees incurred in the present proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement and incorrect application of Article 43(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.