CELEX: C2006/178/60
Language: en
Date: 2006-07-29 00:00:00
Title: Case T-194/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of  11 May 2006  — TeleTech Holdings v OHIM — Teletech International (TELETECH INTERNATIONAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Extent of the examination required — Conversion of a Community trade mark application to a national trade mark application — Article 58 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

29.7.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 178/32
            
         Order of the Court of First Instance of 11 May 2006 — TeleTech Holdings v OHIM — Teletech International (TELETECH INTERNATIONAL)
   (Case T-194/05) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Extent of the examination required - Conversion of a Community trade mark application to a national trade mark application - Article 58 of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2006/C 178/60)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: TeleTech Holdings, Inc. (Denver, Colorado, United States) (represented by: A. Gould and M. Blair, Solicitors)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: D. Botis, Agent)
   
      The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: Teletech International SA (Paris, France) (represented by: J.-F. Adelle and F. Zimeray, lawyers)
   Re:
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2005 (R 497/2004-1), relating to opposition proceedings between TeleTech Holdings, Inc. and Teletech International SA
   Operative part of the order
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The applicant is ordered to pay the costs, with the exception of those incurred by the intervener.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The intervener shall bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 171, 9.7.2005.