CELEX: 31974D0554
Language: en
Date: 1974-10-28 00:00:00
Title: Commission Decision of 28 October 1974 on the reimbursement by the Guidance Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg of premiums paid during 1973 for grubbing apple trees, pear trees and peach trees

No L 303 / 10                               Official Journal of the European Communities                              13 . 11 . 74
                                                        COMMISSION
                                                      COMMISSION DECISION
                                                           of 28 October 1974
                 on the reimbursement by the Guidance Section of the European Agricultural
                 Guidance and Guarantee Fund to the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg of
                  premiums paid during 1973 for grubbing apple trees , pear trees and peach trees
                                                    (Only the French text is authentic)
                                                               (74/554/ EEC)
THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN                                           Guidance Section of the European Agricultural Guid­
COMMUNITIES,                                                             ance and Guarantee Fund should therefore reimburse
                                                                         50 % of that amount, i.e. Lfrs 1 980 752 (39 615 units
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European                    of account) ;
Economic Community ;
                                                                         Whereas the Fund Committee has been consulted on
Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No                            the financial aspects and in particular as to the funds
25 17/ 69 ( 1 ) of 9 December 1969 laying down certain                   available ,
measures for reorganizing Community fruit produc­
tion , as last amended by Regulation (EEC) No
2456/72 (2) ;                                                            HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION :
Having regard to Council Regulation ( EEC) No                                                   Article 1
2093/70 (3 ) of 20 October 1970 adopting general rules
for the application of Articles 6 and 7 ( 1 ) of Regula­                 The contribution by the Guidance Section of the Euro­
tion (EEC) No 2517/69 , and in particular Article 2 (2)                  pean Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund
thereof ;                                                                towards the expenditure incurred by the Grand Duchy
                                                                         of Luxembourg during 1973 in respect of premiums
Whereas the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg has made                           for grubbing apple trees, pear trees and peach trees
an application for the reimbursement of all expendi­                     shall be Lfrs 1 980 752 (39 615 units of account).
ture in respect of premiums granted during 1973 ;
Whereas this application is in accordance with the                                              Articlc 2
provision of Commission Regulation ( EEC) No
                                                                         This Decision is addressed to the Grand Duchy of
 1096/71 (4) of 27 May 1971 on applications for the
                                                                         Luxembourg.
reimbursement of premiums granted by the Member
States for grubbing apple trees, pear trees and peach
trees ;                                                                  Done at Brussels , 28 October 1974 .
Whereas an examination of the information communi­
                                                                                                   For the Commission
cated shows that premiums of a total amount of Lfrs
3 961 505 (79 230 units of account) were paid under                                                    The President
the conditions laid down in Regulation ( EEC) No
2517/69 and its rules of application ; whereas the                                                Francois-Xavier ORTOLI
(') OJ  No     L 318 , 18 . 12 . 1969 , p. 15 .
(2) OJ  No     L 266,  25 . 11 . 1972, p. 9 .
(3) OJ  No     L 232,  21 . 10 . 1970 , p. 5 .
(«) OJ  No     L 116,  28 . 5 . 1971 , p. 35 .