CELEX: 62011TB0259
Language: en
Date: 2013-10-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-259/11: Order of the General Court of 9 October 2013 — Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs v Commission (Action for annulment — Phare programme — Project concerning the development of a centre for innovation and testing of construction products — Commission decision to undertake recovery of part of the sums paid — Lack of direct concern — Inadmissibility)

7.12.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 359/11
            
         Order of the General Court of 9 October 2013 — Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs v Commission
   (Case T-259/11) (1)
   
   (Action for annulment - Phare programme - Project concerning the development of a centre for innovation and testing of construction products - Commission decision to undertake recovery of part of the sums paid - Lack of direct concern - Inadmissibility)
   2013/C 359/19
   Language of the case: Latvian
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs (Jelgava, Latvia) (represented by: E. Darapoļskis, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. van Nuffel and A. Sauka, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought by the association Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs in accordance with Article 263 TFEU, seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision notified to the Ministry of Finance of the Republic of Latvia by letter dated 16 November 2010.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The application for access to Commission documents is also dismissed.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Zinātnes, inovāciju un testēšanas centrs shall pay the costs.
            
         
               4.
            
            
               There is no need to adjudicate on the applications to intervene from the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Lithuania.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 252, 27.8.2011.