CELEX: 62015TN0476
Language: en
Date: 2015-08-19 00:00:00
Title: Case T-476/15: Action brought on 19 August 2015 — European Food v OHIM — Société des Produits Nestlé (FITNESS)

12.10.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 337/37
            
         Action brought on 19 August 2015 — European Food v OHIM — Société des Produits Nestlé (FITNESS)
   (Case T-476/15)
   (2015/C 337/42)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: European Food SA (Drăgăneşti, Romania) (represented by: I. Speciac, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘FITNESS’ — Community trade mark No 2 470 326
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 June 2015 in Case R 2542/2013-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision and remit the case to the Office in order to issue a decision in compliance with the Court’s ruling;
            
         
               —
            
            
               as a subsidiary, alter the contested decision and cancel CTM Fitness no 2470326;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs generated by the current proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of rule 37(b)(vi), rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95 and Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.