CELEX: 62018CB0237
Language: en
Date: 2018-07-18 00:00:00
Title: Case C-237/18: Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — Pauline Stiernon and Others v Etat belge, SPF Santé publique, Communauté française de Belgique (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice — Freedom of movement for workers — Freedom to choose an occupation — Articles 20, 21 and 45 TFEU — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — Article 15 — Profession of psychomotor therapist not included in the national list of allied health professions)

5.11.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 399/17
            
         
      Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — Pauline Stiernon and Others v Etat belge, SPF Santé publique, Communauté française de Belgique
      (Case C-237/18) (1)
      
      ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Freedom of movement for workers - Freedom to choose an occupation - Articles 20, 21 and 45 TFEU - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 15 - Profession of psychomotor therapist not included in the national list of allied health professions))
      (2018/C 399/23)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Referring court
      
      Tribunal de première instance de Liège
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicants: Pauline Stiernon, Marion Goraguer, Muriel Buccarello, Clémentine Vasseur, Manon Pirotton, Anissa Quotb
      
         Defendants: Etat belge, SPF Santé publique, Communauté française de Belgique
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      Article 45 TFEU must be interpreted as not precluding, in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings, legislation of a Member State establishing a list of allied health professions that does not include the profession of psychomotor therapist in that list, even though an undergraduate degree in psychomotor therapy has been established in that Member State.
      
         (1)  OJ C 190, 4.6.2018.