CELEX: 62014TN0398
Language: en
Date: 2014-06-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-398/14: Action brought on 5 June 2014  — Best-Lock (Europe) v OHIM — Lego Juris (Shape of a toy figure)

13.10.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 361/11
            
         Action brought on 5 June 2014 — Best-Lock (Europe) v OHIM — Lego Juris (Shape of a toy figure)
   (Case T-398/14)
   2014/C 361/14
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Best-Lock (Europe) (Colne, United Kingdom) (represented by: W. Krahl, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lego Juris A/S (Billund, Denmark)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 4 April 2014 in Case R 1896/2013-4 and declare Community trade mark No 50  518 with respect to Class 28 to be revoked;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Registered Community trade mark in respect of which an application for revocation has been made: Three-dimensional mark in the shape of a toy figure for goods in Classes 9, 25 and 28 — Community trade mark No 50  518
   
      Proprietor of the Community trade mark: Lego Juris A/S
   
      Party applying for revocation of the Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejection in part of the application for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Articles 51(1)(a) and 15(2)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009