CELEX: 62015TN0166
Language: en
Date: 2015-04-02 00:00:00
Title: Case T-166/15: Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Gramberg v OHIM — Mahdavi Sabet (Protective case for a mobile telephone)

15.6.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 198/40
            
         Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Gramberg v OHIM — Mahdavi Sabet (Protective case for a mobile telephone)
   (Case T-166/15)
   (2015/C 198/55)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Claus Gramberg (Essen, Germany) (represented by: S. Kettler, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sorouch Mahdavi Sabet (Paris, France)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the design at issue: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Design at issue: Community design No 1 968 496-0002
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 January 2015 in Case R 460/2013-3
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision and declare Community design No 1 968 496-0002 invalid;
               in the alternative,
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision and remit the case to the Board of Appeal for a new decision on the invalidity of Community design No 1 968 496-0002;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of 5(1)(b) Regulation No 6/2002;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 7(1) of Regulation No 6/2002.