CELEX: C1996/046/21
Language: en
Date: 1996-02-17 00:00:00
Title: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Gelsenkirchen by order of that court of 21 December 1995 in the case of Hellmut Marschall v. Land Nordrhein-Westfalen (Case C-409/95)

17 . 2 . 96               EN                    Official Journal of the European Communities                                        No C 46/ 11
4 . According to the decision, GSM radiotelephony services                 Commerce ( Commercial Court), Paris, ( First Chamber A ) of
       ' should . . . probably be regarded as also constituting a          27 November 1995 , received at the Court Registry on
       market separate from the market for analogue mobile                 29 December 1995 , for a preliminary ruling in the case of
       telephony'. In the view of the Italian Government, that             Eurotunnel SA, France Manche SA, Eurotunnel PLC and
       conclusion is mistaken and, in any event, insufficiently            The Channel Tunnel Group Limited v. SA SNAT Nouvelle
       substantiated .                                                     d'Armement Transmanche — Voluntary interveners :
                                                                           International Duty Free Confederation , Airport Operators
5 . The contested decision is vitiated by errors of assessment             Association Limited, Cie Maritime Bretagne Angleterre
       and a defective statement of reasons .
                                                                           Irlande and Passenger Shipping Association Limited — on
                                                                           the following questions :
0 ) OJ No L 280 , 23 . 11 . 1995 , p . 49 .
                                                                           1 . Given the fact that Eurotunnel did not bring an action
                                                                                  pursuant to Article 173 for the annulment of those parts
                                                                                  of Council Directives 91 /680/EEC and 92/ 12/EEC
                                                                                  relating to taxation (VAT and excise duty ) on
Action brought on 22 December 1995 by the Kingdom of                              cross-channel links ( J ) and that an application brought
Belgium against the Commission of the European                                    by Eurotunnel in the High Court of Justice was
                               Communities
                                                                                  dismissed by decision of 17 February 1995 , will an
                           ( Case C-407/95 )                                      application for their annulment brought by Eurotunnel
                               ( 96/C 46/ 19 )                                    lie pursuant to Article 177 of the Treaty ?
An action against the Commission of the European                           2 . If so, did the Chamber adopt those directives
Communities was brought before the Court of Justice of the                        lawfully ?
European Communities on 22 December 1995 by the
Kingdom of Belgium, represented by J. Devadder, Director                          In the alternative, does Directive 94/4/EC ( 2 ) cover a
of Administration in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs,                             possible annulment of those two directives ?
Foreign Trade and Development Aid, with an address for
service in Luxembourg at the Belgian Embassy, 4 Rue des                    3 . In the event of annulment, must the fact that SA SNAT
Girondins .                                                                       — Nouvelle d'Armement Transmanche — applied the
                                                                                  fiscal laws adopted pursuant to those directives be
The applicant claims that the Court should :                                      imputed to it as a fault ? If so, as from what date was the
                                                                                  fault committed ?
annul Commission Regulation ( EC ) No 2358/95 on the
exceptional allocation of a quantity additional to the tariff               ( J ) Council Directive 91 /680/EEC, Article 1 ( 22 ) ( Article 28k of
quota for imports of bananas during the fourth quarter of                         Directive 77/388/EEC ) ( OJ 1991 L 376 , pp . 1 and 17 ); Council
 1995 as a result of tropical storms Iris, Luis and Marilyn ( 1 ),                Directive 92/ 12/EEC, Article 28 ( OJ 1992 L 76 , pp . 1 and
and order the Commission to pay the costs .                                       12 ).
                                                                            ( 2 ) Council Directive 94/4/EC ( OJ 1994 L 60, p . 14 ).
Pleas in law and main arguments
The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as those
 invoked against Regulation ( EC ) No 2791 /94 in Case
 C-9/95 ( 2 ).
 (') OJ No L 241 , 10 . 10 . 1995 , p . 5 .
                                                                            Reference for a preliminary ruling from the
 ( 2 ) OJ No C 54, 4 . 3 . 1995 , p . 9 .                                   Verwaltungsgericht Gelsenkirchen by order of that court of
                                                                            21 December 1995 in the case of Hellmut Marschall v. Land
                                                                                                    Nordrhein-Westfalen
                                                                                                     ( Case C-409/95 )
                                                                                                        ( 96/C 46/21 )
 Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de
 Commerce de Paris ( First Chamber A) by judgment of that
 court of 27 November 1995 in the case of Eurotunnel SA,                     Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the
 France Manche SA, Eurotunnel PLC and the Channel                            European Communities by an order of the First Chamber of
 Tunnel Group Limited v. SA SNAT Nouvelle d'Armement                         the Verwaltungsgericht Gelsenkirchen ( Gelsenkirchen
                                                                             Administrative Court) of 21 December 1995 , which was
 Transmanche — Voluntary interveners: International Duty
 Free Confederation, Airport Operators Association                           received at the Court Registry on 29 December 1995 , for a
 Limited, Cie Maritime Bretagne Angleterre Irlande and                       preliminary ruling in the case of Hellmut Marschall v. Land
              Passenger Shipping Association Limited                         Nordrhein-Westfalen on the following question:
                             ( Case C-408/95 )                               Does Article 2(1 ) and ( 4 ) of Council Directive 76/207/EEC
                                 ( 96/C 46/20 )                              of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle
                                                                             of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to
  Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the                     employment, vocational training and promotion, and
  European Communities by judgment of the Tribunal de                        working conditions ( ] ) preclude a rule of national law under
 ---pagebreak--- No C 46/12          | EN 1                     Official Journal of the European Communities                                         17. 2 . 96
which in official sectors in which fewer women than men are               against the Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex
employed in the relevant higher grade post in a career group,             parte: The Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to
where men and women promotion candidates are equally                      Animals and Compassion in World Farming Ltd, on the
qualified ( suitability, competence and professional                      following questions:
performance ) women must be given priority unless reasons
specific to a male candidate predominate ?
                                                                          'Where :
(') OJ No L 39, 14 . 2 . 1976 , p . 40 .
                                                                          ( a ) all of the Member States have become parties to the
                                                                                 European Convention for the Protection of Animals
                                                                                 Kept for Farming Purposes 1976 ('the Convention')
                                                                                 and the Convention has been approved by EC Decision
                                                                                 78/923/EEC (*) of 18 June 1978 ( OJ L 323 , 1978 ,
                                                                                 p. 12 );
Reference for a preliminary ruling by the Tribunal de
Commerce, Nice, by judgment of that court of 1 February
1995 in the case of Societe des Grands Garages                            ( b ) the 1988 Recommendation concerning cattle ('the
Mediterraneens SA and Nissan France against Societe Nice                         Recommendation') has been adopted by the Standing
                      Quest Automobiles                                          Committee established pursuant to the Convention and
                                                                                 has    become    effective   under    the   terms    of   the
                        ( Case C-4 10/95 )                                       Convention;
                           ( 96/C 46/22 )
                                                                          (c ) the standards laid down by and pursuant to the
Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the                           Convention contain stipulations as to the minimum
European Communities by judgment of the 7th Chamber of                           width of veal crates and the composition of veal calves '
the Tribunal de Commerce ( Commercial Court), Nice, of                           diets;
1 February 1995 , which was received at the Court Registry
on 27 December 1995 , for a preliminary ruling in the case of
Societe des Grands Garages Mediterraneens SA and Nissan                   ( d ) Council Directive 91 /629/EEC ( 2 ) lays down obligatory
France against Societe Nice Ouest Automobiles on the                             minimum standards for the protection of calves which
following question :                                                             are lower than the standards laid down by and pursuant
                                                                                 to the Convention in certain respects, including the
Must Regulation No 123/85 (*) of the European Economic                           width of veal crates and the composition of calves '
Community be interpreted as prohibiting professional                             diets;
resellers of vehicles who are not party to an exclusive
distribution network from obtaining supplies from an agent                (e ) the Directive permits Member States to maintain or
for the same manufacturer in another Member State ?
                                                                                 apply within their territories stricter provisions for the
                                                                                 protection of calves than those laid down in this
(') Commission Regulation ( EEC ) No 123/85 of 12 December                       Directive;
    1984 on the application of Article 85 ( 3 ) of the Treaty to certain
    categories of motor vehicle distribution and servicing
    agreements ( OJ 1985 L 15 , p. 16 ).                                  ( f) veal calves are exported from a Member State
                                                                                 ('Member State A') to certain other Member States
                                                                                 ('Member States B') which have implemented and/or
                                                                                 complied with the Directive but have not implemented
                                                                                 and/or complied with the standards indicated at
                                                                                 paragraph (c ) above although Member State A has
                                                                                 implemented and complied with those standards;
Reference for a preliminary ruling by the High Court of
Justice, Queen's Bench Division, by order of that court of                 ( g) the export of calves to face rearing contrary to the
 12 December 1995 , in the case of The Queen against the                         Convention is considered to be cruel and immoral by
Minister of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food, ex parte: The                       animal welfare organizations and a considerable body
Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and                       of public opinion, supported by authoritative scientific
             Compassion in World Farming Ltd.                                    veterinary opinion, in the Member State from which
                            Case C-l /96 )                                       exports occur.'
                            ( 96/C 46/23 )
                                                                           1 . In the circumstances set out above, may Member State A
 Reference has been made to the Court of Justice of the                         rely on Article 36 of the EC Treaty and, in particular, the
 European Communities by an order of the High Court of                          grounds of public morality and/or public policy and/or
Justice, Queen's Bench Division, of 12 December 1995 ,                          the protection of the health or life of animals contained
 which was received at the Court Registry on 2 January                          therein, to justify any restriction in relation to the export
 1996, for a preliminary ruling in the case of The Queen                        of live calves from Member State A with a view to