CELEX: 62003TA0018
Language: en
Date: 2009-04-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-18/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 2009 — CD-Contact Data v Commission (Competition — Agreements, decisions and concerted practices — Market for Nintendo video games consoles and games cartridges — Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC — Limitation of parallel exports — Proof of the existence of an agreement to limit parallel trade — Fines — Differential treatment — Attenuating circumstances)

20.6.2009   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 141/38
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 30 April 2009 — CD-Contact Data v Commission
   (Case T-18/03) (1)
   
   (Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for Nintendo video games consoles and games cartridges - Decision finding an infringement of Article 81 EC - Limitation of parallel exports - Proof of the existence of an agreement to limit parallel trade - Fines - Differential treatment - Attenuating circumstances)
   2009/C 141/76
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: CD-Contact Data GmbH (Burglengenfeld, Germany) (represented by: J. de Pree and R. Wesseling, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: P. Oliver, X. Lewis and O. Beynet, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   APPLICATION for the annulment of Commission Decision 2003/675/EC of 30 October 2002 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (COMP/35.587 PO Video Games, COMP/35.706 PO Nintendo Distribution and COMP/36.321 Omega — Nintendo) (OJ 2003 L 255, p. 33).
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Sets the amount of the fine imposed on CD-Contact Data GmbH at EUR 500 000;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders each party to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 70, 22.3.2003.