CELEX: 62003CJ0232
Language: en
Date: 2006-02-23
Title: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2006. # Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Finland. # Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations - Workers - Freedom of movement - Use of vehicles registered abroad and made available to the worker by the employer residing abroad. # Case C-232/03.

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 February 2006 – Commission v Finland
      (Case C-232/03)
      Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Workers – Freedom of movement – Use of vehicles registered abroad and made available to the worker by the employer residing abroad
      Freedom of movement for workers – Workers – Restrictions (Art. 39 EC) (see paras 49-52, 55, operative part 1)
      Re:
      
         
               Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations – Articles 10 EC and 39 EC – Conditions for the use by workers residing in
                  Finland and employed abroad of vehicles registered abroad and made available to them by the employer
               
            Operative part:
      The Court:
      
         
                  1.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  Declares that, by preventing cross-frontier workers residing in Finland and employed in another Member State from benefiting
                     from the use of company vehicles which are made available by their employers established in another Member State and registered
                     in the latter State on the sole ground that the cross-frontier workers concerned reside on Finnish territory, into which the
                     vehicles belonging to their employers have been imported,
                  
               
            and
      by preventing the cross-frontier workers concerned from benefiting, for professional and private purposes, from the use of
         company vehicles which are made available by their employers established in another Member State and registered in the latter
         State, while those vehicles are neither intended to be used mainly in Finland on a permanent basis nor, in fact, used in that
         way, on the sole ground that those workers reside on Finnish territory, into which the vehicles belonging to their employers
         have been imported,
      
      the Republic of Finland has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 39 EC;
      
         
                  2.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  Dismisses the remainder of the application;
               
            
         
                  3.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  Orders each party to bear its own costs;
               
            
         
                  4.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.