CELEX: 62015TN0191
Language: en
Date: 2015-04-10 00:00:00
Title: Case T-191/15: Action brought on 10 April 2015 — SLE Schuh v OHIM — Vigoss Tekstil Konfeksiyon Sanayi ve Ticaret (VIOS)

22.6.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 205/35
            
         Action brought on 10 April 2015 — SLE Schuh v OHIM — Vigoss Tekstil Konfeksiyon Sanayi ve Ticaret (VIOS)
   (Case T-191/15)
   (2015/C 205/48)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: SLE Schuh GmbH (Graz, Austria) (represented by: A. Stolitzka, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vigoss Tekstil Konfeksiyon Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi (Istanbul, Turkey)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘VIOS’ — Application No 11 283 546
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2015 in Case R 623/2014-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               uphold the action and alter the contested decision to the effect that registration of the mark ‘VIOS’ is allowed to proceed in respect of all the Classes and thus also in respect of:
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           Class 18: Goods made of these materials (of leather and imitations of leather) and not included in other classes; Trunks and travelling bags; Parasols;
                        
                     
                           —
                        
                        
                           Class 25: Clothing, headgear;
                        
                     In the alternative:
            
         
               —
            
            
               uphold the action and annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.