CELEX: C2001/317/50
Language: en
Date: 2001-11-10 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 5 July 2001 in Case T-182/00 Marco Pannella v European Parliament (Expenses and allowances of Members of the European Parliament — Absence from Parliamentary sessions — Justification — Rejection of application — Withdrawal of the contested measure — No need to give a ruling — Inadmissibility)

10.11.2001             EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                           C 317/25
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                          of 6 July 2001                                                             of 5 July 2001
in Case T-161/00 Vassilios Tsarnavas v Commission of
                                                                          in Case T-182/00 Marco Pannella v European Parliament (1)
                 the European Communities (1)
(Officials — Action for annulment and damages — With-                     (Expenses and allowances of Members of the European
drawal of the contested decision in the course of proceedings             Parliament — Absence from Parliamentary sessions —
— Adoption of a new decision — No need to give a ruling                   Justification — Rejection of application — Withdrawal of
                        — Inadmissibility)                                the contested measure — No need to give a ruling —
                                                                                                    Inadmissibility)
                         (2001/C 317/49)
                                                                                                   (2001/C 317/50)
                    (Language of the case: French)
                                                                                              (Language of the case: Italian)
In Case T-161/00: Vassilios Tsarnavas, an official of the
Commission of the European Communities, residing in Brus-
sels, represented by N. Lhoëst, avocat, with an address for               In Case T-182/00: Marco Pannella, a Member of the European
service in Luxembourg, against Commission of the European                 Parliament, residing in Rome, represented by P.A.M. Ferrari,
Communities (Agents: C. Berardis-Kayser and D. Martin) —                  avvocato, with an address for service in Luxembourg, against
application, in the first place, for annulment of the decision of         European Parliament (Agents: H. Krück and A. Caiola) —
13 August 1999 not to promote the applicant to Grade A 4                  application for annulment of the decision of the College of
in the promotions for 1999 and for annulment of the                       Quaestors of the European Parliament of 15 March 2000,
Commission’s decision of 22 September 2000 refusing to                    notified to the applicant by letter of 17 April 2000, rejecting
promote the applicant to Grade A 4 in the promotions for                  the applicant’s request to be allowed to justify his absence
1999 and, second, for reparation of alleged non-material                  during the period of the session of the European Parliament
damage — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber),                    from 17 to 21 January 2000, pursuant to Article 28(2) of the
composed of: P. Mengozzi, President, V. Tiili and R.M. Moura              regulations governing the expenses and allowances of Mem-
Ramos, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 6 July            bers of the European Parliament — the Court of First Instance
2001, the operative part of which is as follows:                          (Second Chamber), composed of: A.W.H. Meij, President,
                                                                          A. Potocki and J. Pirrung, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made
                                                                          an order on 5 July 2001, the operative part of which is as
                                                                          follows:
1.    There is no longer any need to give a ruling on the forms of
      order seeking annulment.
                                                                          1.    There is no need to give a ruling in the present action.
2.    The remainder of the action is inadmissible.
                                                                          2.    The Parliament shall bear its own costs together with those of
3.    The Commission shall bear its own costs and those incurred by             the applicant.
      the applicant up to 10 November 2000.
                                                                          (1) OJ C 285 of 7.10.2000.
(1) OJ C 247 of 26.8.2000.