CELEX: 62018CN0264
Language: en
Date: 2018-04-13 00:00:00
Title: Case C-264/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 13 April 2018 — P. M., N. G.d.M., P. V.d.S. v Ministerraad

201807200162012732018/C 276/222642018CJC27620180806EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180413151621Case C-264/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 13 April 2018 — P. M., N. G.d.M., P. V.d.S. v Ministerraad
 ---documentbreak--- C2762018EN1510120180413EN0022151162Request for a preliminary ruling from the Grondwettelijk Hof (Belgium) lodged on 13 April 2018 — P. M., N. G.d.M., P. V.d.S. v Ministerraad
   (Case C-264/18)2018/C 276/22Language of the case: Dutch
      Referring court
   
   Grondwettelijk Hof
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicants: P. M., N. G.d.M., P. V.d.S.
   
      Defendant: Ministerraad
   
      Question referred
   
   Is Article 10(c) and (d)(i), (ii) and (v) of Directive 2014/24/EU (
         1
      ) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014‘on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC’ compatible with the principle of equal treatment, whether or not read in conjunction with the principle of subsidiarity and with Articles 49 and 56 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, since the services mentioned therein are excluded from the application of the procurement rules in the aforementioned Directive which nevertheless guarantee full competition and free movement in the procurement of services by public authorities?
   (
         1
      )	OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65.