CELEX: 62017TN0820
Language: en
Date: 2017-12-15 00:00:00
Title: Case T-820/17: Action brought on 15 December 2017 — Frinsa del Noroeste v EUIPO — Alimentos Friorizados (Alfrisa)

12.3.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 94/28
            
         Action brought on 15 December 2017 — Frinsa del Noroeste v EUIPO — Alimentos Friorizados (Alfrisa)
   (Case T-820/17)
   (2018/C 094/38)
   Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Frinsa del Noroeste, SA (Santa Eugenia de Ribeira, Spain) (represented by: J. Botella Reyna, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alimentos Friorizados, SA (Barberá del Vallés, Spain)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘Alfrisa’ — Application for registration No 14 899 223
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 September 2017 in Case R 956/2017-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul EUIPO’s decisions dismissing the opposition and the proceedings brought by the applicant in relation to EU Mark No 14 899 223, ‘Alfrisa’, for goods and services in classes 29 and 35;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the applicant for the trade mark at issue to pay the costs, in accordance with Article 85 of the EU Trade Mark Regulation and rule 94 of the Regulation implementing the Community Trade Mark Regulation
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.