CELEX: 62015CB0397
Language: en
Date: 2016-01-13 00:00:00
Title: Case C-397/15: Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Itzehoe — Germany) — Raffeisen Privatbank Liechtenstein AG v Gerhild Lukath (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations — First Protocol concerning the interpretation by the Court of the Rome Convention — Articles 1 and 2(a) and (b) — National courts entitled to make a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling — Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

18.4.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 136/6
            
         Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 13 January 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Itzehoe — Germany) — Raffeisen Privatbank Liechtenstein AG v Gerhild Lukath
   (Case C-397/15) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations - First Protocol concerning the interpretation by the Court of the Rome Convention - Articles 1 and 2(a) and (b) - National courts entitled to make a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court))
   (2016/C 136/09)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Referring court
   
   Landgericht Itzehoe
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Raffeisen Privatbank Liechtenstein AG
   
      Defendant: Gerhild Lukath
   
      in the presence of: Rüdiger Boy, Boy Finanzberatung GbhH, Christian Maibaum, Vienna-Life Lebensversicherung AG, Frank Weber
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly does not have jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Landgericht Itzehoe (Regional Court, Itzehoe (Germany)) for a preliminary ruling by decision of 15 June 2015 in Case C-397/15.
   
      (1)  OJ C 320, 28.9.2015.