CELEX: 32005M3813
Language: en
Date: 2005-06-10 00:00:00
Title: Commission Decision of 10/06/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No COMP/M.3813 - FORTUNE BRANDS / ALLIED DOMECQ) according to Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (Only the English text is authentic)

Important legal notice

|

32005M3813

Commission Decision of 10/06/2005 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market (Case No IV/M.3813 - FORTUNE BRANDS / ALLIED DOMECQ) according to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 (Only the English text is authentic)  


		Brussels, 10.06.2005SG-Greffe(2005) D/202584To the notifying partyDear Sir/Madam,Subject: Case No COMP/M.3813 - FORTUNE BRANDS / ALLIED DOMECQNotification of 2 May 2005 pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation No 139/2004 [1]1. On 2 May 2005, the Commission received a notification of a proposed concentration pursuant to Article 4 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 (“Merger Regulation”) by which the undertaking Fortune Brands Inc. (“Fortune Brands”) acquires within the meaning of Article 3(1)(b) of the Council Regulation control of various brands and assets of Allied Domecq plc (“Allied Domecq”) and of Pernod Ricard SA (“Pernod Ricard”).I. THE PARTIES2. Fortune Brands is a publicly listed US company active in the consumer goods sector, mainly home and hardware, golf equipment, office products and spirits and wines. US Whiskey “Jim Beam” and the “New World” wines “Geyser Peak” and “Wild Horse” are amongst its main spirit and wine brands.3. Allied Domecq is a publicly listed English company active in the production and distribution of spirits and wines on a world-wide scale. The Allied Domecq brands and assets concerned by the present transaction include among others the Scotch whisky “Teachers” and “Laphroaig”, the tequila “Sauza”, the brandy “Courvoisier”, the aniseed “Castellana”, the bitter “Kuemmerling” and several still and fortified wines.4. Pernod Ricard is a publicly quoted French company active in the production and distribution of alcoholic beverages, mainly spirits and wines, on a world-wide scale. The Pernod Ricard brand and assets concerned by the present transaction is the “Larios” brand, primarily a gin brand.II. THE OPERATION AND THE CONCENTRATION5. On 21 April 2005, Fortune Brands and Pernod Ricard signed a framework agreement pursuant to which Fortune Brands is to acquire the control of various brands and assets of Allied Domecq [2]. On the same day, Fortune Brands and Pernod Ricard signed a separate sale and purchase agreement pursuant to which Fortune Brands will also acquire Pernod Ricard’s Larios brand. The acquisition by Fortune Brands of the Larios brand belonging to Pernod Ricard is part the overall distribution of the Allied Domecq assets between Pernod Ricard and Fortune Brands.6. This transaction is conditional to the completion of the acquisition by Pernod Ricard of the entire issued and to be issued share capital of Allied Domecq by way of a public bid announced on 21 April 2005. The acquisition by Pernod Ricard of sole control over Allied Domecq is subject to the Commission’s clearance under the Merger Regulation.7. The acquisition by Fortune Brands of the Allied Domecq and Pernod Ricard’s brands will take place in two stages. First, Fortune Brands will acquire shares in the bidding vehicle that will be created for the acquisition by Pernod Ricard of the whole of Allied Domecq. The purpose of the acquisition of these shares, which will account for approximately 37% of the issued share capital but will not carry any voting rights, is to protect the value of the brands and assets that will be ultimately transferred to Fortune Brands. This will also confer Fortune Brands certain contractual rights to manage and operate immediately the relevant Allied Domecq brands and assets. Then, within a period of six months, the transfer of the relevant Allied Domecq brands and assets will become effective.8. The notified transaction thus constitutes a concentration under the Merger Regulation whereby Fortune Brands acquires control of several brands and assets of Allied Domecq and Pernod Ricard.III. COMMUNITY DIMENSION9. The undertakings concerned have a combined aggregate world-wide turnover of more than EUR 5 billion [3] (Fortune Brands, EUR […] million and assets to be acquired from Allied Domecq and Pernod Ricard, EUR […] million). Each of Fortune Brands and the assets to be acquired from Allied Domecq and Pernod Ricard have a Community-wide turnover in excess of EUR 250 million (Fortune Brands, EUR […] million and assets to be acquired from Allied Domecq and Pernod Ricard, EUR […] million), but they do not achieve more than two-thirds of their aggregate Community-wide turnover within one and the same Member State. The notified operation therefore has a Community dimension.IV. COMPETITIVE ASSESSMENT10. The concentration relates to the spirit and wine sector. As far as the wine sector is concerned, the notifying party submits that the sales of wine in the EEA by Fortune Brands and by the assets that they will acquire from Allied Domecq and Pernod Ricard are de minimis [4]. Therefore it can be concluded that the transaction will not lead to any affected market in the wine sector. This has been confirmed by the market investigation where no concerns were raised on the impact of the transaction in the wine markets. These markets will thus not be further examined in this decision.A. The relevant product markets11. On the basis of the Guinness/Grand Metropolitan [5] and Pernod Ricard/Diageo/Seagram [6] Commission decisions, the notifying party considers that the relevant product markets have to be defined for each of the main spirit category, i.e. whiskey, Cognac/Armagnac, other brandies, rum, gin, vodka, tequila, aniseed, bitters and liqueurs.12. Fortune Brands is mainly active in the EEA in the sale of US whiskey which therefore constitutes the main relevant product market of this case. The notifying party considers that it is appropriate to segment the whiskey market between Scotch whisky, Irish whiskey, US whiskey, and Canadian whiskey. A similar approach had been adopted by the Commission in its decision Pernod Ricard/Diageo/Seagram where Scotch whisky was said to constitute a separate relevant market. Therefore, the notifying party also submits data in relation to these narrower markets.13. The market investigation has broadly confirmed the views of the notifying party and the applicability of the past Commission assessments to the present case. However the exact product market definition can be left open for the purposes of this decision as even if the narrower product market definition for whiskey was retained, this would not change the competitive assessment.B. Relevant geographic markets14. The notifying party submits that the market for the production and distribution of spirits is national, in agreement with the findings of the Commission in the Guinness/Grand Metropolitan and Pernod Ricard/Diageo/Seagram decisions. This has been confirmed by the market investigation.C. Assessment15. Due to the so far limited presence of Fortune Brands in the EEA, the only affected product markets by the transaction are the “all whiskey” markets in Germany and Spain and the US whiskey markets in Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany, Hungary and Sweden. However, the increase in market shares resulting from the transaction will be less than [0-5%] for all the above mentioned markets with the exception of the “all whiskey” market in Germany where the new entity has a combined market share of [10-20%] [7] with an increment of [0-5%].16. In view of the minimal competitive overlap and the results of the market investigation which has shown no indication of competition concerns if all alternative market definitions are considered, it can be concluded that the notified concentration will not significantly impede effective competition in particular as a result of the creation or the strengthening of a dominant position.V. CONCLUSION17. For the above reasons, the Commission has decided not to oppose the notified operation and to declare it compatible with the common market and with the EEA Agreement. This decision is adopted in application of Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004.For the CommissionsignedNeelie KROESMember of the Commission[1] OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1.[2] The brands and assets are the following: Teachers, Laphroaig, DYC, Canadian Club, Maker’s Mark (whiskey); Sauza (tequila); Courvoisier, Centenario, Fundador, Jacobi (brandy); Castellana (aniseed); Kuemmerling (bitters); Harvey’s (sherry); Cockburn’s (port); Buena Vista, Clos du Bois, Atlas Peak, Callaway, William Hill, Jerry Garcia, Gary Farrell, Haywood Estate, Jakes Fault (US wines) and the distribution assets of Allied Domecq in the UK, Spain (except wine distribution) and Germany.[3] Turnover calculated in accordance with Article 5(1) of the Merger Regulation and the Commission Notice on the calculation of turnover (OJ C66, 2.3.1998, p25).[4] Fortune Brands markets two wine’s brands in the EEA, representing less than [1%] of the sales of still light wines (a segment of the wine sector) in each of the following countries: Norway, Ireland, Denmark and the Netherlands. Sales of the Allied Domecq brands concerned by the transaction are limited to Germany and represent [less than 1%] of the still light wines sales.[5] Commission decision of 15.10.1997, case No IV/M.938.[6] Commission decision of 9.05.2001, case No COMP/M.2268.[7] Market shares based on 2003 volume data--------------------------------------------------