CELEX: 62016TA0617
Language: en
Date: 2017-11-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-617/16: Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2017 — PF v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2015 promotion exercise — Articles 43 and 45(1) of the Staff Regulations — Duty to provide a statement of reasons — Consideration of comparative merits — Use of languages in the context of the duties performed by administrators assigned to linguistic duties and by administrators assigned to non-linguistic duties — Legitimate absences — Manifest error of assessment)

15.1.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 13/16
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2017 — PF v Commission
   (Case T-617/16) (1)
   
   ((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2015 promotion exercise - Articles 43 and 45(1) of the Staff Regulations - Duty to provide a statement of reasons - Consideration of comparative merits - Use of languages in the context of the duties performed by administrators assigned to linguistic duties and by administrators assigned to non-linguistic duties - Legitimate absences - Manifest error of assessment))
   (2018/C 013/26)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: PF (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 8 in the 2015 promotion exercise.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders PF to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016 (Case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-47/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).