CELEX: 62015CA0655
Language: en
Date: 2017-03-02 00:00:00
Title: Case C-655/15 P: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber Chamber) of 2 March 2017 — Panrico, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (EUIPO), HDN Development Corp. (Appeal — European Union trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 52 — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) — Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘krispy kreme doughnuts’ — National and international word and figurative marks containing the elements ‘donut’, ‘donuts’ and ‘doughnuts’ — Application for a declaration of invalidity — Dismissal)

18.4.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 121/7
            
         Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber Chamber) of 2 March 2017 — Panrico, SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (EUIPO), HDN Development Corp.
   (Case C-655/15 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - European Union trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 40/94 - Article 52 - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 8(5) - Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘krispy kreme doughnuts’ - National and international word and figurative marks containing the elements ‘donut’, ‘donuts’ and ‘doughnuts’ - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Dismissal))
   (2017/C 121/08)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Panrico, SA (represented by: D. Pellisé Urquiza, abogado)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), HDN Development Corp. (represented by: M. H. Granado Carpenter and L. Polo Carreño, abogadas)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               dismisses the appeal;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               orders Panrico SA to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.