CELEX: C2000/233/18
Language: en
Date: 2000-08-12 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 May 2000 in Case C-273/98 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof): Hans-Josef Schlebusch v Hauptzollamt Trier (Additional levy on milk — Original and special reference quantities — Accumulation — Definitive allocation of a special reference quantity — Conditions — Temporary transfer of part of an original reference quantity before the definitive allocation of a special reference quantity)

12.8.2000                EN                     Official Journal of the European Communities                                                C 233/9
Judges; A. Saggio, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Administrator,            obligations under the EC Treaty and Article 7 of Directive
for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 23 May 2000, in                 76/464 — the Court (Sixth Chamber) composed of: R. Schint-
which it has ruled:                                                        gen, President of the Second Chamber, P.J.G. Kapteyn,
                                                                           G. Hirsch (Rapporteur), H. Ragnemalm and V. Skouris, Judges;
The derogation provided for in Article 7(1)(a) of Council Directive        P. Léger, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Administrator, for the
79/7/EEC of 19 December 1978 on the progressive implementation             Registrar, has given a judgment on 25 May 2000 in which it:
of the principle of equal treatment for men and women in matters of        1.    Declares that, by failing to adopt pollution reduction program-
social security must be interpreted as applying to a benefit, such as            mes including quality objectives for the dangerous substances
the reduced earnings allowance at issue in the main proceedings,                 covered by the first indent of List II of the annex to Council
which was introduced into national legislation after expiry of the               Directive 76/464/EEC of 4 May 1976 on pollution caused by
period prescribed for transposition of the Directive and is subject to           certain dangerous substances discharged into the aquatic
age conditions which differ according to sex.                                    environment of the Community, the Hellenic Republic has
                                                                                 failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 7(1) of that directive;
(1) OJ C 234 of 25.7.1998.
                                                                           2.
                                                                                 Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.
                                                                           (1) OJ C 26 of 24.1.1998.
                  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                          (Sixth Chamber)                                                     JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                                                       (Second Chamber)
                           of 25 May 2000
                                                                                                         of 25 May 2000
in Case C-384/97 Commission of the European Communi-
                    ties v Hellenic Republic (1)                           in Case C-273/98 (reference for a preliminary ruling from
                                                                           the Bundesfinanzhof): Hans-Josef Schlebusch v Haupt-
(Failure of a Member State to fulfil its obligations — Water                                             zollamt Trier (1)
pollution — Obligation to adopt programmes in order to
reduce pollution caused by certain dangerous substances —                  (Additional levy on milk — Original and special reference
          Failure to transpose Directive 76/464/EEC)                       quantities — Accumulation — Definitive allocation of a
                                                                           special reference quantity — Conditions — Temporary
                                                                           transfer of part of an original reference quantity before the
                           (2000/C 233/17)                                      definitive allocation of a special reference quantity)
                                                                                                        (2000/C 233/18)
                     (Language of the case: Greek)
                                                                                                (Language of the case: German)
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
                    in the European Court Reports)                         (Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published
                                                                                                 in the European Court Reports)
In Case C-384/97, Commission of the European Communities
(Agent: M. Condou-Durande) v Hellenic Republic (Agents:                    In Case C-273/98: reference to the Court under Article 177 of
A. Samoni-Rantou and E.-M. Mamouna) — Application for a                    the EC Treaty from the Bundesfinanzhof, Germany, for a
declaration that, by failing to establish programmes including             preliminary ruling in the proceedings pending before that
quality objectives and setting deadlines for their implementa-             court between Hans-Josef Schlebusch and Hauptzollamt Trier
tion, in order to reduce water pollution caused by the                     — on the interpretation of the first sentence of Article 3a(3) of
99 dangerous substances covered by the first indent of List II             Council Regulation (EEC) No 857/84 of 31 March 1984
in the annex to Council Directive 76/464/EEC of 4 May                      adopting general rules for the application of the levy referred
1976 on pollution caused by certain dangerous substances                   to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC) No 804/68 in the milk
discharged into the aquatic environment of the Community                   and milk products sector (OJ 1984 L 90, p. 13), as amended
(OJ 1976 L 129, p. 23), and consequently by failing to require             by Council Regulation (EEC) No 1639/91 of 13 June 1991 (OJ
discharges which are made into waters and liable to contain                1991 L 150, p. 35) — the Court (Second Chamber), composed
any of the said substances to be subject to a prior authorisation          of: R. Schintgen, President of the Chamber, G. Hirsch (Rappor-
issued by the competent authority in which emission standards              teur) and V. Skouris, Judges; G. Cosmas, Advocate General;
are set on the basis of quality objectives laid down in such               R. Grass, Registrar, has given a judgment on 25 May 2000, in
programmes, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its                 which it has ruled:
 ---pagebreak--- C 233/10                 EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                      12.8.2000
The first sentence of Article 3a(3) of Council Regulation (EEC)             Article 119 of the EC Treaty (Articles 117 to 120 of the EC Treaty
No 857/84 of 31 March 1984 adopting general rules for the                   have been replaced by Articles 136 EC to 143 EC) applies to
application of the levy referred to in Article 5c of Regulation (EEC)       supplementary retirement pension schemes, such as that at issue in
No 804/68 in the milk and milk products sector, as amended by               the main proceedings, and precludes those schemes from discrimina-
Council Regulation (EEC) No 1639/91 of 13 June 1991, must be                ting, as from 17 May 1990, between men and women in respect of
interpreted in the light of the principles governing the system for the     the age at which their spouse is entitled to a survivor’s pension
grant of a special reference quantity as meaning that a producer            following the death of those employees.
holding an original reference quantity who provisionally receives a
special reference quantity in addition may not be definitively allocated
that special reference quantity, regardless of the other conditions
                                                                            (1) OJ C 100 of 10.4.1999.
required, when he himself has not used it in order to increase current
milk production on his holding. That is the case where such a
producer leases out his original reference quantity and produces on
his holding only his provisional special reference quantity of milk.
(1) OJ C 278 of 5.9.1998.
                                                                                             JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                                                    (Second Chamber)
                  JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
                                                                                                      of 8 June 2000
                           (Fifth Chamber)
                                                                            in Case C-98/98 (reference for a preliminary ruling from
                           of 25 May 2000                                   the High Court of Justice (England &Wales), Queen’s
                                                                            Bench Division (Divisional Court)): Commissioners of
in Case C-50/99 (reference for a preliminary ruling from                               Customs & Excise v Midland Bank plc (1)
the Tribunal de Grande Instance, Paris): Jean-Marie
Podesta v Caisse de Retraite par répartition des Ingénieurs                 (Value added tax — First and Sixth VAT Directives —
          Cadres & Assimilés (CRICA) and Others (1)                         Deduction of input tax — Taxable person carrying out both
                                                                            taxable and exempt transactions — Attribution of input
(Social policy — Equal pay for men and women — Private,                     services to output transactions — Need for a direct and
inter-occupational, supplementary retirement pension sche-                                            immediate link)
me based on defined contributions and run on a ‘pay-as-you-
go’ basis— Survivors’ pensions for which the age conditions
                  for grant vary according to sex)                                                   (2000/C 233/20)
                           (2000/C 233/19)
                                                                                               (Language of the case: English)
                     (Language of the case: French)                         In Case C-98/98: reference to the Court under Article 177 of
                                                                            the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) from the High Court of
                                                                            Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Divisional
(Provisional translation; the definitive translation will be published      Court), United Kingdom, for a preliminary ruling in the
                    in the European Court Reports)                          proceedings pending before that court between Commissio-
                                                                            ners of Customs & Excise plc and Midland Bank plc — on the
In Case C-50/99: reference to the Court under Article 177 of                interpretation of Article 2 of the First Council Directive
the EC Treaty (now Article 234 EC) from the Tribunal                        67/227/EEC of 11 April 1967 on the harmonisation of
de Grande Instance, Paris, for a preliminary ruling in the                  legislation of Member States concerning turnover taxes (OJ,
proceedings pending before that court between Jean-Marie                    English Special Edition 1967, p. 14) and Article 17(2), (3) and
Podesta and Caisse de Retraite par répartition des Ingénieurs               (5) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977
Cadres & Assimilés (CRICA) and Others — on the interpreta-                  on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating
tion of Article 119 of the EC Treaty (Articles 117 to 120 of                to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax:
the EC Treaty have been replaced by Articles 136 EC to 143 EC)              uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1)— the Court
— the Court (Fifth Chamber), composed of: D.A.O. Edward,                    (Second Chamber), composed of: R. Schintgen, President of
President of the Chamber, L. Sevón, P.J.G. Kapteyn (Rappor-                the Chamber, G. Hirsch (Rapporteur) and H. Ragnemalm,
teur), P. Jann and M. Wathelet, Judges; J. Mischo, Advocate                 Judges; A. Saggio, Advocate General; L. Hewlett, Principal
General; L. Hewlett, Administrator, for the Registrar, has given            Administrator, for the Registrar, has given a judgment on
a judgment on 25 May 2000, in which it has ruled:                           8 June 2000, in which it has ruled: