CELEX: 51987PC0218
Language: en
Date: 1987-06-16
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL REGULATION (EEC) amending Regulation (EEC) No 1940/81 on an integrated development programme for the Department of Lozère (submitted by the Commission)

ARCHIVES HISTORIQUES
DE LA COMMISSION
COLLECTION RELIEE DES
DOCUMENTS "COM"
COM (87) 218
Vol. 1987/0124
 ---pagebreak--- Disclaimer
Conformément au règlement (CEE, Euratom) n° 354/83 du Conseil du 1er février 1983 concernant
l'ouverture au public des archives historiques de la Communauté économique européenne et de
la Communauté européenne de l'énergie atomique (JO L 43 du 15.2.1983, p. 1) modifié en dernier
lieu par le règlement (UE) 2015/496 du Conseil du 17 mars 2015 (JO L79 du 25. 3.2015, p. 1), ce
dossier est ouvert au public. Le cas échéant, les documents classifiés présents dans ce dossier
ont été déclassifiés conformément à l'article 5 dudit règlement ou sont considérés déclassifiés
conformément aux articles 26(3) et 59(2) de la décision (UE, Euratom) 2015/444 de la
Commission du 13 mars 2015 concernant les règles de sécurité aux fins de la protection des
informations classifiées de l'Union européenne.
In accordance with Council Regulation (EEC, Euratom) No 354/83 of 1 February 1983 concerning
the opening to the public of the historical archives of the European Economic Community and the
European Atomic Energy Community (OJ L 43, 15.2.1983, p. 1), as last amended by Council
Regulation (EU) 2015/496 of 17 March 2015 (OJ L 79, 27.3.2015, p. 1), this file is open to the
public. Where necessary, classified documents in this file have been declassified in conformity
with Article 5 of the aforementioned regulation or are considered declassified in conformity with
Articles (26.3) and 59(2) of the Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/444 of 13 March 2015
on the security rules for protecting EU classified information.
In Übereinstimmung mit der Verordnung (EWG, Euratom) Nr. 354/83 des Rates vom 1. Februar
1983 über die Freigabe der historischen Archive der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft und
der Europäischen Atomgemeinschaft (ABI. L 43 vom 15.2.1983, S. 1), zuletzt geändert durch die
Verordnung (EU) Nr. 2015/496 vom 17. März 2015 (ABI. L 79 vom 25.3.2015, S. 1), ist dieser Akt
der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich. Soweit erforderlich, wurden die Verschlusssachen in diesem Akt in
Übereinstimmung mit Artikel 5 der genannten Verordnung freigegeben; beziehungsweise werden
sie auf Grundlage von Artikel 26(3) und 59(2) der Entscheidung der Kommission (EU, Euratom)
2015/444 vom      13.   März 2015     über die   Sicherheitsvorschriften für den Schutz von  EU-
Verschlusssachen als herabgestuft angesehen.
 ---pagebreak--- COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES
                                                           COM(87 ) 218 final
                                                           Brussels, 16 june1987
                                  Proposal for a
                             COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC )
     amending Regulation ( EEC ) No 1940 / 81 on an integrated development
                     programme for the Department of Lozère
                          ( submitted by the Commission )
                                      o5 \ ÏÔT7T7\
                                           110
                                             1 1 /[n
                                                   1 J . / 7v
                              B                        1^7 l§
  C0M(87 ) 218 final
 ---pagebreak---                                 EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1 . The measure introduced by Council Regulation ( EEC ) No 1940 / 81 on an
    integrated development programme for the Department of Lozere^ terminates
    on 5 April 1987 , the reason being that under Article 6 of the Regulation
    the duration of the measure is five years from the date of notification of
    the Commission opinion on the programme , this having been issued on 5 April
    1982 .
2 . The implementation of the programme has been delayed , essentially because
    of its innovatory character , and it will not be completed by 5 April 1987 .
    An extension of the time limit is therefore required if the full programme
    is to be completed .   In view of the actual programme costs incurred it is
    proposed , in the light of experience , to reduce the estimated cost stated
    in Article 6(3 ) of the Regulation to 8 million ECU for the entire duration
    of the common measure .
3 . It is proposed therefore to make the abovementioned reductions and extend
    the term of validity of the Regulation on the integrated development
    programme for the Department of Lozere by two years in order to allow the
    programme to be continued without interruption or complication .
1
   OJ No L 197 , 20.7.1981   P  9.
 ---pagebreak---                                    Proposal for a
                            COUNCIL REGULATION ( EEC )
      amending Regulation ( EEC ) No 1940 / 81 on an integrated development
                    programme for the Department of Lozere
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES ,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European Economic Community , and
 in particular Article 43 thereof ,
Having regard to the proposal from the Commission ,^"
                                                               2
Having regard to the opinion of the European Parliament ,
Whereas Article 6(1 ) of Council Regulation ( EEC ) No 1940 / 81 /■ as amended
                                  4
 by Régulation ( EEC ) No 797 / 85 , stipulâtes
that the duration of the common measure shall be five years from the date of
notification of the Commission opinion specified in Article 4(3 ) of that
Regulation ; whereas the measure was due to terminate on 5 April 1987 ;
Whereas it has not been possible to complete the work scheduled in the
programme within the periods of time anticipated ; whereas the duration of the
common measure should therefore be extended by two years ;
Whereas experience indicates that the estimated cost stated in Article 6(3 ) of
Regulation ( EEC ) No 1940 / 81 is to high for the likely pattern of
reimbursement ; whereas it should therefore be reduced to 8 million ECU ;
1 OJ No
2 OJ No
3 OJ No L 197 , 10.7.1981 , p.
4 OJ No L 93 , 30.3.1985 , p. 1
5 0J No L 197, 27.7.1985 , p. 1
 ---pagebreak---                                              2
HAS ADOPTED THIS REGULATION :
                                         Article 1
Regulation ( EEC ) No 1940 / 81 is hereby amended as follows :
1 • •'■ n Article 6 , paragraphs 1 and 3 are replaced by the following :
    " 1 . The duration of the common measure shall be limited to seven years from
           the date of notification of the opinion referred to in Article 4(3 )."
    " 3 . The estimated cost of the common measure to the Fund is 8 million
           ECU for the period specified in paragraph 1 ."
2 . Article 7(1 ) is replaced by the following :
    " 1 . Expenditure by the French Republic on the measures    referred to in
           Article 5(1 ) shall be eligible for aid from the Fund up to a maximum of
           20 million ECU for the period specified in Article 6(1 ), of which a
           maximum of 604 500 ECU may be in respect of the actual cost, excluding
           public administrative staff costs, of drawing up the programme ."
                                         Article 2
The Regulation shall enter into force on the third day following its
publication in the Official Journal of the European Communities .
This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in
all Member States .
Done at Brussels ,                                         For the Council
                                                           The President
 ---pagebreak---      FINANCIAL               STATEMENT conceming :               a proposai for a Council Régulation
      amending REgulation ( EEC ) No 1940 / 81 concerning an integrated development
      programme for the Department of Lozere
 1 . Budget heading :       HI B            Item : 322           Title : Regional actions introduced
                                                                           before 1985
 2 . Legal basis :    Art . 43
 3. Classification :         Compulsory expenditure
 4. Purpose/description of the measure :        to extend the duration of the common measure
     by two years so that the work in progress can be completed
 5.     Method of calculation :
 5.1 Form of expenditure : reimbursement of eligible expenditure
5.2 Connunity contribution : 45 % 0 f eligible expenditure
5.3     Calculation :   (1 )
6. Financial implication as regards operating appropriations :
6.1 Schedule of commitment appropriations and appropriations for payment (m ECU) :
                Year                     Ccmmitment appropriations / P. A.
                19 87                       1.250   (2)
                19 88                       1.25
                19 89                       1.25
                19 90                       0.70
                19 91
                following years
                Total  1987-89              3.75
. -, c .      ... 1 985-89                  5.35 ( 3 )
6.2     Financing during current year :
7 . Observations :
     ( 1 ) The estimated cost to EAGGF Guidance is revised downwards from 12m to 8m ECU
           for the entire period of application of the common measure .
     ( 2 ) Entered in 1987 budget .
     ( 3 ) The total of payments in 1985-86 ( 1.6m ECU ) plus anticipated payment in
           1987-89 does not exceed the amount scheduled for this measure when the
           financial framework for 1985-89 was fixed .
 ---pagebreak---                                                               ANNEXE   II
Fiche d' impact de certains actes Législatifs sur Les PME et L' emploi
  1.  Obligations administratives dé ¬      néant
      coulant de l' application de la
       législation pour les entreprises
 2.   Avantages pour l' entreprise          - oui / aon ■
          . lesquelles                      Impacts en amont et en aval pour
                                            les entreprises travaillant pour
                                            le secteur agricole .
 3.   Inconvénients pour l' entre ¬         - ©u4 / non
      prise ( coûts supplémentaires )
          . conséquences
 4.   Effets sur l' emploi                  Positifs
 5.   Y a -t - il eu concertation pré ¬     - wi - / non
      alable avec les partenaires
      sociaux ?
          . avis des partenaires
             sociaux
 6.   Y a-t - il une approche alter¬        - -otH- / non
      native moins contraignante ?
          . laquelle
                                         ··