CELEX: 62016TN0367
Language: en
Date: 2016-07-11 00:00:00
Title: Case T-367/16: Action brought on 11 July 2016 — Brunner v EUIPO — CBM (H HOLY HAFERL HAFERL SHOE COUTURE)

22.8.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 305/52
            
         Action brought on 11 July 2016 — Brunner v EUIPO — CBM (H HOLY HAFERL HAFERL SHOE COUTURE)
   (Case T-367/16)
   (2016/C 305/70)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Gerd Brunner (Moosthenning, Germany) (represented by: N. Maenz, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘H HOLY HAFERL HAFERL SHOE COUTURE’ — Application for registration No 11 988 144
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 10 May 2016 in Case R 2943/2014-5
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the Opposition Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office of 10 May 2016 (Case R 2943/2014-5);
            
         
               —
            
            
               dismiss the intervener’s opposition of 12 November 2013 regarding EU trade mark No 11 306 545 and German trade mark No 302 010 023 903 (Case B002269325);
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO to pay the costs.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.