CELEX: C2007/056/56
Language: en
Date: 2007-03-10 00:00:00
Title: Case T-127/05: Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 January 2007 — Lootus Teine Osaühing v Council (Action for annulment — Regulation (EC) No 2269/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 2270/2004 — Fisheries — Fishing opportunities for deep sea species for the new Member States which acceded in 2004 — Persons directly and individually concerned — Inadmissibility)

10.3.2007   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 56/28
            
         Order of the Court of First Instance of 9 January 2007 — Lootus Teine Osaühing v Council
   (Case T-127/05) (1)
   
   (Action for annulment - Regulation (EC) No 2269/2004 and Regulation (EC) No 2270/2004 - Fisheries - Fishing opportunities for deep sea species for the new Member States which acceded in 2004 - Persons directly and individually concerned - Inadmissibility)
   (2007/C 56/56)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Lootus Teine Osaühing (Lootus) (Tartu, Estonia) (represented by: T. Sild and K. Martin, Lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. de Gregorio Merino, F. Ruggeri Laderchi and A. Westerhof Lörefflerova, Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: L. Uibo and H. Prieß, Agents)
   
      Intervener in support of the defendant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by K. Banks, Agent)
   Re:
   Action for annulment in part of, first, the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2269/2004 of 20 December 2004 amending Regulations (EC) Nos 2340/2002 and 2347/2002 as concerns fishing opportunities for deep sea species for the new Member States which acceded in 2004 (OJ 2004 L 396, p. 1) and, second, Part 2 of the Annex to Council Regulation (EC) No 2270/2004 of 22 December 2004 fixing for 2005 and 2006 the fishing opportunities for Community fishing vessels for certain deep-sea fish stocks (OJ 2004 L 396, p. 4), in so far as those provisions concern the fishing opportunities allocated to Estonia.
   Operative part of the order
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The applicant shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the Council.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               The Commission shall bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 115, 14.5.2005.