CELEX: C2000/102/51
Language: en
Date: 2000-04-08 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 6 December 1999 in Case T-81/98: Patricia Boyes v Commission of the European Communities (Death of the applicant — Proceedings not continued by her successors — No need to adjudicate)

8.4.2000              EN                     Official Journal of the European Communities                                           C 102/25
Luxembourg at the Chambers of Maria Dennewald, 12 Avenue                      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
de la Porte Neuve, v Council of the European Union (Agents:
Frédéric Anton and Georg Berrisch) — application for taxation
of costs following the judgment of the Court of First Instance
of 18 September 1995 in Case T-168/94 Blackspur and Others                                    of 6 December 1999
v Council and Commission [19951 ECR II-2627 — the Court
of First Instance (First Chamber, Extended Composition),
composed of: B. Vesterdorf, President, A. Potocki, A.W.H. Meij,         in Case T-81/98: Patricia Boyes v Commission of the
M. Vilaras and N. Forwood, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has                                European Communities (1)
made an order on 7 February 2000, the operative part of
which is as follows:
                                                                        (Death of the applicant — Proceedings not continued by her
The total amount of the costs to be reimbursed jointly and severally
                                                                                     successors — No need to adjudicate)
by Blackspur DIY Ltd and by Steven Kellar, J.M.A. Glancy and
Ronald Cohen to the Council of the European Union is fixed at DEM
32 860.
                                                                                                (2000/C 102/51)
(1) OJ C 277 of 15.10.1993.
                                                                                          (Language of the case: English)
                                                                        In Case T-81/98: Patricia Boyes, residing in Porlock, United
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                              Kingdom, represented by Becket Bedford, Barrister, of the Bar
                                                                        of England and Wales, and John Kelly, Sarah Ferdinand and
                                                                        Jatinder Sandhu, of Ferdinand Kelly, Solicitors, 21 Bennetts
                      of 4 February 2000                                Hill, Birmingham v Commission of the European Communities
                                                                        (Agents: Klaus Wiedner and Xavier Lewis), supported by The
in Case T-147/96: Howard Batho v Commission of the                      Grand Pub Company Ltd, whose registered office is in London,
                  European Communities (1)                              represented by John Boyce and Bertrand Louveaux, Solicitors,
                                                                        with an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of
                                                                        Philippe Hoss, 2 Place Winston Churchill — application for
(Officials — Objection of inadmissibility — New and
                                                                        annulment of the Commission’s decision of 5 March 1998
substantial fact — Confirmatory act — Classification in
                                                                        (Case IV/94.907/F3 - NAIL) rejecting the applicant’s complaint
       grade — Article 31(2) of the Staff Regulations)
                                                                        under Article 3(2) of Regulation No 17 of the Council of
                                                                        6 February 1962, First Regulation implementing Articles 85
                       (2000/C 102/50)                                  and 86 of the Treaty (OJ, English Special Edition 1959-1962,
                                                                        p. 87) concerning the standard lease used by Inntrepreneur
                                                                        Estates Ltd for letting its licensed premises in the United
                  (Language of the case: French)                        Kingdom, requiring tenants to purchase certain specified types
                                                                        of beer exclusively from the supplier designated by the lessor,
                                                                        and for compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by
In Case T-147/96: Howard Batho, official of the Commission
                                                                        reason of that decision — the Court (Third Chamber), compo-
of the European Communities, residing in Honnekinberg,
                                                                        sed of K. Lenaerts, President, J. Azizi and M. Jaeger, Judges;
Belgium, represented by J.-N. Louis and T. Demaseure, of the
                                                                        H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on 6 December 1999,
Brussels Bar, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the
                                                                        the operative part of which is as follows:
Société de Gestion Fiduciaire SARL, 2-4 Rue Beck, against
Commission of the European Communities (Agents: G. Valse-
sia and J. Currall) — application for annulment of the
                                                                        1. There is no need to adjudicate on the application.
Commission decision of 12 February 1996 classifying the
applicant — the Court of First Instance (single judge) has made
an order on 4 February 2000 in which it:
                                                                        2. The parties, including the intervener, shall bear their own costs.
1. Dismisses the action;
2. Orders each party to bear its own costs.                             (1) OJ C 234 of 25.7.1998.
(1) OJ C 354 of 23.11.1996.