CELEX: 62015TN0748
Language: en
Date: 2015-12-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-748/15: Action brought on 21 December 2015 — Gauff v OHIM — H.P. Gauff Ingenieure (Gauff)

29.2.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 78/26
            
         Action brought on 21 December 2015 — Gauff v OHIM — H.P. Gauff Ingenieure (Gauff)
   (Case T-748/15)
   (2016/C 078/36)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Gauff GmbH & Co. Engineering KG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: A. Molnar, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: H.P. Gauff Ingenieure GmbH & Co. KG — JBG (Frankfurt am Main, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Gauff’ — Community trade mark No 6 192 521
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 8 October 2015 in Case R 1350/2014-1
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               in the alternative, refer the case back to OHIM for further examination of the disputed matters that were, in error, not examined;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Articles 53, 56, 57 and 76 of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Regulation No 2868/95;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Breach of the right to be heard;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Defective statement of reasons.