CELEX: 62011TB0382
Language: en
Date: 2012-07-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-382/11: Order of the General Court of 9 July 2012 — Pigui v Commission (Action for failure to act — Position taken — Application for directions to be issued — Manifest inadmissibility)

8.9.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 273/9
            
         Order of the General Court of 9 July 2012 — Pigui v Commission
   (Case T-382/11) (1)
   
   (Action for failure to act - Position taken - Application for directions to be issued - Manifest inadmissibility)
   2012/C 273/14
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Cristina Pigui (Strejnic, Romania) (represented by: M. Alexe, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Enegren and D. Roussanov, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Action for failure to act, seeking a declaration that the European Commission unlawfully failed to define its position on the applicant’s request, first, to initiate, pursuant to Articles 4 and 15 of Decision No 1720/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 November 2006 establishing an action programme in the field of lifelong learning (OJ 2006 L 327, p. 45), an investigation into the Online Master organised by the European Online Academy (EOA), founded by the Centre international de formation européenne (CIFE), in cooperation with the Jean Monnet Chair at the University of Cologne (Germany), and, second, to take all measures provided for by Article 6 of that decision in order to prevent further illegal conduct, to restore the situation ab initio of those persons affected by such illegal conduct or, at least, in so far as the applicant is concerned, and, lastly, to withdraw the funding for that Master if it fails to comply with key human rights principles, to which reference is made in Article 1(3)(i) of that decision, and relevant principles of European Union law.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Cristina Pigui shall pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.