CELEX: C2006/212/64
Language: en
Date: 2006-09-02 00:00:00
Title: Case T-183/06: Action brought on 11 July 2006 — Portuguese Republic v Commission

2.9.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 212/36
            
         Action brought on 11 July 2006 — Portuguese Republic v Commission
   (Case T-183/06)
   (2006/C 212/64)
   Language of the case: Portuguese
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Portuguese Republic (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: L.Fernandes, Agent, C.Botelho Moniz, advogado, and E.Maia Cadete, advogado)
   
      Defendant: Commission
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the Decision of 28 April 2006 of the Commission of the European Communities entitled ‘Commission Decision 28/IV/2006 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Agricultural Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)’ in so far as it applies in the case of Portugal a financial correction of 100 % in the flax sector, amounting to EUR 3 135 348,71;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the Commission of the European Communities to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   The subject-matter of the action is the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 28 April 2006 entitled ‘Commission Decision 28/IV/2006 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)’ in so far as it applies in the case of Portugal a financial correction of 100 % in the flax sector, amounting to EUR 3 135 348,71, in the context of the scheme introduced by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1164/89 of 28 April 1989 laying down detailed rules concerning the aid for fibre flax and hemp (1).
   
      (1)  OJ L 121, 29.4.1989, p.4