CELEX: C2006/074/31
Language: en
Date: 2006-03-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-147/03: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of  12 January 2006  — Devinlec v OHIM (Community trade mark — Figurative mark containing the verbal element  quantum  — Opposition of the proprietor of the national figurative mark Quantième — Relative ground of refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b), Article 15(2) and Article 43(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

25.3.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 74/16
            
         Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 12 January 2006 — Devinlec v OHIM
   (Case T-147/03) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Figurative mark containing the verbal element ‘quantum’ - Opposition of the proprietor of the national figurative mark Quantième - Relative ground of refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b), Article 15(2) and Article 43(3) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2006/C 74/31)
   Language of the case: English
   Parties:
   
      Applicant: Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA (Toulouse, France) (represented by: J.-P. Simon, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Novais Gonçalves and A. Folliard-Monguiral, Agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the Court of First Instance: T.I.M.E. ART Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: F. Jacobacci, lawyer)
   Action
   brought against against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 January 2003 (Case R 109/2002-3) relating to opposition proceedings between Devinlec Développement Innovation Leclerc SA and T.I.M.E. Art Uluslararasi Saat Ticareti ve diş Ticaret AŞ
   Operative part of the judgment
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 30 January 2003 (Case R 109/2002-3).
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) to pay its own costs and those incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Court.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the intervener to pay its own costs and those incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 171 of 19.7.2003.