CELEX: 62013TN0435
Language: en
Date: 2013-08-20 00:00:00
Title: Case T-435/13: Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Triarii v Commission

19.10.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 304/21
            
         Action brought on 20 August 2013 — Triarii v Commission
   (Case T-435/13)
   2013/C 304/37
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Triarii BV (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by: G. Verhellen, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the European Commission (Re.: ENER B 1/IMMR(2013) ENER.B.1.2638778) dated 20 June 2013 in order to include the offer of the applicant in the tender;
            
         
               —
            
            
               In case the Court’s decision, as sought, is taken after the tender is awarded to a bidder:
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           Annul the current tender No ENER/B1/2013-371 in order to give the applicant a chance to bid again;
                        
                     
                           —
                        
                        
                           Annul the decision to be taken by the European Commission granting tender No ENER/B1/2013-371 to a bidder; and/or
                        
                     
                           —
                        
                        
                           Grant damages in compensation of a missed opportunity, due to the exclusion of the applicant from the tender No ENER/B1/2013-371.
                        
                     
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
   
               1.
            
            
               First plea in law, alleging that the General Court is competent to try the present case, in conformity with Article 263 TFEU.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second plea in law, alleging that, through its conduct, the Commission created legitimate expectation that the bid was served in due time on it.