CELEX: 62015FA0118
Language: en
Date: 2016-06-28 00:00:00
Title: Case F-118/15: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 28 June 2016 — Kotula v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — 2014 promotion exercise — General implementing provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — List of officials recommended for promotion by the Directors-General and Heads of Department — Omission of the applicant’s name — Inter-institutional transfer — Taking into account staff reports drawn up by the previous institution — Possibility of contesting the list of officials recommended for promotion before the Joint Promotions Committee — Consideration of the comparative merits of the officials eligible for promotion)

8.8.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 287/35
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 28 June 2016 — Kotula v Commission
   (Case F-118/15) (1)
   
   ((Civil service - Officials - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - 2014 promotion exercise - General implementing provisions for Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - List of officials recommended for promotion by the Directors-General and Heads of Department - Omission of the applicant’s name - Inter-institutional transfer - Taking into account staff reports drawn up by the previous institution - Possibility of contesting the list of officials recommended for promotion before the Joint Promotions Committee - Consideration of the comparative merits of the officials eligible for promotion))
   (2016/C 287/43)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Marcin Kotula (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the Commission’s decision not to promote the applicant in the 2014 promotion exercise.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders each party to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 320, 28. 9. 2015, p. 57.