CELEX: C2003/239/33
Language: en
Date: 2003-10-04 00:00:00
Title: Case T-238/03: Action brought on 13 June 2003 by Patrick O'Malley against the Commission of the European Communities

4.10.2003                 EN                          Official Journal of the European Union                                        C 239/17
Action brought on 13 June 2003 by Eileen Oglesby                              The applicant claims that the Court should:
   against the Commission of the European Communities
                                                                              —      annul the decision contained in Article 2 of Commission
                             (Case T-237/03)                                         Decision of 4 April 2003 on the requests received by the
                                                                                     Commission to increase in MAGP IV objectives to take
                                                                                     into account improvements on safety, navigation at sea,
                            (2003/C 239/32)
                                                                                     hygiene, product quality and working conditions for
                                                                                     vessels of more than 12 m in length overall notified
                      (Language of the case: English)                                under document number C(2003) 1113 to reject a safety
                                                                                     capacity application for a proposed new RSW vessel An
                                                                                     Capall Oir to replace the MFV An Capall Ban;
An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the                    —      order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceed-
European Communities on 13 June 2003 by Eileen Oglesby,                              ings.
Kincasslagh, (Ireland), represented by P. Gallagher and A. Col-
lins, Barristers, and D. Barry, Solicitor.
                                                                              Pleas in law and main arguments
The applicant claims that the Court should:
—      annul the decision contained in Article 2 of Commission                The applicant invokes the same pleas in law as in Case T-218/
       Decision of 4 April 2003 on the requests received by the               03 (1).
       Commission to increase in MAGP IV objectives to take
       into account improvements on safety, navigation at sea,
                                                                              (1 ) See p. 9 of this Official Journal.
       hygiene, product quality and working conditions for
       vessels of more than 12 m in length overall notified
       under document number C(2003) 1113 to reject a safety
       capacity application for a proposed new RSW vessel to
       replace the MFV Neptune;
—      order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceed-
       ings.                                                                  Action brought on 13 June 2003 by Paul O’Neill against
                                                                                      the Commission of the European Communities
Pleas in law and main arguments                                                                           (Case T-239/03)
The applicant invokes the same pleas in law as in Case T-218/                                             (2003/C 239/34)
03 (1).
                                                                                                    (Language of the case: English)
( 1) See p. 9 of this Official Journal.
                                                                              An action against the Commission of the European Communi-
                                                                              ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
                                                                              European Communities on 13 June 2003 by Paul O’Neill,
                                                                              Killybegs, (Ireland), represented by P. Gallagher and A. Collins,
                                                                              Barristers, and D. Barry, Solicitor.
Action brought on 13 June 2003 by Patrick O’Malley
   against the Commission of the European Communities
                                                                              The applicant claims that the Court should:
                             (Case T-238/03)
                                                                              —      annul the decision contained in Article 2 of Commission
                            (2003/C 239/33)                                          Decision of 4 April 2003 on the requests received by the
                                                                                     Commission to increase in MAGP IV objectives to take
                      (Language of the case: English)                                into account improvements on safety, navigation at sea,
                                                                                     hygiene, product quality and working conditions for
                                                                                     vessels of more than 12 m in length overall notified
                                                                                     under document number C(2003) 1113 to reject a safety
An action against the Commission of the European Communi-                            capacity application for a proposed new RSW vessel, the
ties was brought before the Court of First Instance of the                           MFV Paraclete;
European Communities on 13 June 2003 by Patrick O’Malley,
Galway, (Ireland), represented by P. Gallagher and A. Collins,                —      order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceed-
Barristers, and D. Barry, Solicitor.                                                 ings.