CELEX: 62011TA0520
Language: en
Date: 2014-02-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-520/11: Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2014 — Genebre v OHIM — General Electric (GE) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community figurative mark GE — Earlier national word mark GE — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

14.4.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 112/27
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2014 — Genebre v OHIM — General Electric (GE)
   (Case T-520/11) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community figurative mark GE - Earlier national word mark GE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   2014/C 112/35
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Genebre, SA (Hospitalet de Llobregat, Spain) (represented by: D. Pellisé Urquiza, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM intervening before the General Court: General Electric Company (Schenectady, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, initially, then E. Armijo Chávarri, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 July 2011 (Case R 20/2009-4), relating to opposition proceedings between General Electric Company and Genebre SA.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Genebre SA to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 13, 14.1.2012.