CELEX: 62013TA0400
Language: en
Date: 2015-09-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-400/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — L’Oréal v OHIM — Cosmetica Cabinas (AINHOA) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark AINHOA — Earlier Community and international figurative marks NOA — Relative grounds for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

23.11.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 389/34
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — L’Oréal v OHIM — Cosmetica Cabinas (AINHOA)
   (Case T-400/13) (1)
   
   ((Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark AINHOA - Earlier Community and international figurative marks NOA - Relative grounds for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   (2015/C 389/35)
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: L'Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: H. Granado Carpenter and M.L. Polo Carreño, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño and A. Schifko, agents)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervening before the General Court: Cosmetica Cabinas SL (El Masnou, Spain) (represented by: L. Montoya Terán and J.-B. Devaureix, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 June 2013 (Case R 1643/2012-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between L’Oréal and Cosmetica Cabinas SL.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders L’Oréal to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 298, 12.10.2013.