CELEX: 62017CN0008
Language: en
Date: 2017-01-09 00:00:00
Title: Case C-8/17: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal) lodged on 9 January 2017 — Biosafe — Indústria de Reciclagens SA v Flexipiso — Pavimentos SA

27.3.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 95/5
            
         Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal) lodged on 9 January 2017 — Biosafe — Indústria de Reciclagens SA v Flexipiso — Pavimentos SA
   (Case C-8/17)
   (2017/C 095/11)
   Language of the case: Portuguese
   
      Referring court
   
   Supremo Tribunal de Justiça
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: Biosafe — Indústria de Reciclagens SA
   
      Defendant: Flexipiso — Pavimentos SA
   
      Questions referred
   
   
               1.
            
            
               Does Directive 219/112/EC, (1) and in particular Articles 63, 167, 168, 178, 179, 180, 182 and 219 thereof, and the principle of neutrality, preclude legislation which has the result that, in circumstances where the seller of the goods, liable for VAT, (i) was subject to a tax inspection which found that the VAT rate that he applied in a given situation was less than the due rate, (ii) paid to the State the additional tax and (iii) seeks to obtain the respective payment from the purchaser, also liable for VAT, the time period for the latter to be able to deduct that additional tax is calculated from the date of issue of the initial invoices and not from the date of issue or receipt of the rectifying documents?
            
         
               2.
            
            
               If the foregoing question is answered in the negative, do the abovementioned articles of that directive and the principle of neutrality preclude legislation which has the result that, once documents rectifying the initial invoices are received, issued following the tax inspection and payment to the State of the additional tax, for the purpose of obtaining payment of that additional tax, at a time when the period for exercising the right of deduction has already elapsed, it is legitimate for the purchaser to refuse to pay, on the basis that refusal of the passing on of tax is justified where it is impossible to deduct that additional tax?
            
         
      (1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).