CELEX: 62007CA0162
Language: en
Date: 2008-05-22 00:00:00
Title: Case C-162/07: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 May 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy)) — Ampliscientifica Srl, Amplifin SpA v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate (Sixth VAT directive — Taxable persons — Second subparagraph of Article 4(4) — Parent companies and subsidiaries — Implementation by the Member State of the single taxable person scheme — Conditions — Consequences)

5.7.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 171/8
            
         Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 May 2008 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Corte Suprema di Cassazione (Italy)) — Ampliscientifica Srl, Amplifin SpA v Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate
   (Case C-162/07) (1)
   
   (Sixth VAT directive - Taxable persons - Second subparagraph of Article 4(4) - Parent companies and subsidiaries - Implementation by the Member State of the single taxable person scheme - Conditions - Consequences)
   (2008/C 171/14)
   Language of the case: Italian
   Referring court
   Corte Suprema di Cassazione
   Parties to the main proceedings
   
      Applicant: Ampliscientifica Srl, Amplifin SpA
   
      Defendant: Ministero dell'Economia e delle Finanze, Agenzia delle Entrate
   Re:
   Reference for a Preliminary Ruling — Interpretation of the second subparagraph of Article 4(4) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1) — ‘Persons who, while legally independent, are closely bound to one another by financial, economic and organisational links’ — Concept sufficiently precise to enable the Member States to apply the VAT scheme set out? — Concept of link — National provision requiring that a link exist for a minimum period of time in order to prevent the abuse or rights
   Operative part of the judgment
   
               1.
            
            
               The second subparagraph of Article 4(4) of the Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment is a provision which, in order to be implemented by a Member State, requires prior consultation by that State of the Advisory Committee on value added tax and the adoption of national legislation authorising persons, in particular companies, established in the territory of the country who, while legally independent, are closely bound to one another by financial, economic and organisational links, no longer to be treated as separate taxable persons for the purposes of value added tax in order to be treated as a single taxable person to whom a single value added tax identification number is allocated and, accordingly, the sole person entitled to submit value added tax declarations. It is for the national court to determine whether national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, satisfies those criteria, subject to the qualification that, where there has been no prior consultation of the Advisory Committee on value added tax, national legislation which meets those criteria constitutes legislation adopted in breach of the procedural requirement laid down in the second subparagraph of Article 4(4) of Sixth Directive 77/388.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               The principle of fiscal neutrality does not preclude national legislation which simply treats taxable persons wishing to opt for a mechanism to simplify value added tax declarations and payments differently according to whether the parent company or body has held more than 50 % of the share capital or stock of the persons with whom it is linked since at least the beginning of the calendar year preceding that in which the declaration was made or, on the contrary, satisfies those conditions only after that date. It is for the national court to determine whether national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, constitutes such a provision. Moreover, neither the principle prohibiting the abuse of rights nor the principle of proportionality precludes such legislation.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 140, 23.6.2007.