CELEX: 62018TN0705
Language: en
Date: 2018-11-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-705/18: Action brought on 28 November 2018 — Air Liquide Industriegase v Commission

28.1.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 35/31
            
         
      Action brought on 28 November 2018 — Air Liquide Industriegase v Commission
      (Case T-705/18)
      (2019/C 35/38)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Air Liquide Industriegase GmbH & Co. KG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: M. Kachel and D. Fouquet, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Commission
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul in full the defendant’s Decision SA.34045 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) of 28 May 2018 relating to Ref. C(2018) 3166 in respect of the years 2012 and 2013;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  in the alternative, annul the defendant’s Decision SA.34045 (2013/C) (ex 2012/NN) of 28 May 2018 relating to Ref. C(2018) 3166 insofar as it orders that, in respect of the years 2012 and 2013, baseload consumers with at least 7 000 hours of full use per year repay more than 20 % of published network charges, baseload consumers with at least 7 500 hours of full use per year repay more than 15 % of published network charges and baseload consumers with at least 8 000 hours of full use per year repay more than 10 % of published network charges;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to pay the costs, including lawyers’ fees and travel expenses.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law which are, in essence, either identical or similar to the pleas in law relied on in Case T-693/18, ZY v Commission.