CELEX: 52011PC0931
Language: en
Date: 2011-12-21
Title: Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the adoption of a Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project (2014-2018)

|
			
		
		
		52011PC0931
		
			Proposal for a COUNCIL DECISION on the adoption of a Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER project (2014-2018) /* COM/2011/0931 final - 2011/0460 (NLE) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM

1.                      
CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL

The purpose of the annexed proposal for a
Council Decision is to define the funding arrangement for the EU contribution
to the ITER project for the period 2014-2018 through a "Supplementary Research Programme" under the Euratom Treaty.
The main purpose of the ITER project[1] is to build and operate an
experimental fusion reactor. ITER is a major step towards the demonstration of
fusion as a sustainable energy source. Due to its important advantages, such as
the availability of large fuel reserves and the lack of CO2
emissions, fusion could greatly contribute to the long-term EU energy strategy.
Furthermore, fusion has inherent safety features that set it apart from
traditional nuclear power. ITER is part of the Strategic Energy Technology
(SET) Plan and will contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy, as the involvement
of European high tech industry should provide the EU with a global competitive
advantage in this promising sector. 
The ITER project is conducted under the
terms of the international Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER
International Fusion Energy Organization for the Joint Implementation of the
ITER Project (the "ITER Agreement")[2]
between the European Atomic Energy Community ("Euratom") and 6 other
Parties: China, India, Japan, Korea, Russia, and the USA. This legally binding agreement
established the ITER Organization with full international legal personality, as
the body responsible for the joint implementation of the ITER project. The
Commission represents Euratom in the different ITER instances, in particular
the ITER Council, the project's major governing body. 
In the framework of the negotiations to
obtain the support of the other ITER parties to fix the site for ITER in
Europe, Euratom and Japan concluded a bilateral agreement setting out
complementary joint fusion research activities, called Broader Approach
activities [3].
As Host Party and bearing the largest share
of the contributions to the construction phase (5/11, or roughly 45% of the
total), Euratom has special responsibilities and obligations, including the
impossibility to withdraw unilaterally from the ITER Agreement.
The EU contribution to the ITER project is
managed through the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of
Fusion Energy ("Fusion for Energy"), established by Council Decision
on 27 March 2007[4].
The Members of Fusion for Energy (Euratom, the 27 Member States and Switzerland)
are all represented in its Governing Board. The EU contribution to the ITER project
consists mainly of major systems and components procured by Fusion for Energy
and provided "in kind" to the ITER Organization during the
construction phase. The European Parliament is responsible for giving the
budgetary discharge to Fusion for Energy.
An important feature of the construction of
ITER is the extreme technical challenge. With its unprecedented scale and
complexity, it represents a major undertaking with contributions in civil,
mechanical, electrical and nuclear engineering. 
ITER shares some features with other large
scale projects of interest to the EU: they can be disproportionately expensive
in relation to the small EU budget and they tend to overrun initial cost
projections. The subsequent need to find additional funds leads either to
redeploy funds that had already been earmarked for other priorities or to
challenge the limits established by the Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF).
These consequences have also been questioned by the European Parliament. In
addition, the redeployments can only be decided upon after a long and complex
inter-institutional process that generates risks for the fulfilment of the
commitments adopted by the EU at international level. 
This is not a sustainable model: a
different approach is needed, one that provides long-term certainty to this
challenging project. For this reason, through its Communication of 29 June 2011
“A Budget for Europe 2020”[5],
the Commission proposed to fund the EU contribution to the ITER project outside
the Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF) after 2013. It is therefore proposed
to set up a Supplementary Research Programme under the Euratom Treaty for the
EU contribution to the ITER project for the period 2014-2018.
It must be noted that the Euratom Treaty
limits the duration of Research Programmes to a maximum of five years.
According to the ITER Agreement, the ITER project will have an initial duration
of 35 years (i.e. until 2041); thus, subsequent Council decisions will be
needed to continue to fund the EU contribution to this project. 
2.           SCOPE OF THE PROPOSAL
The proposed Supplementary
Research Programme covers the contributions to the construction of the ITER
facility, procurement of equipment and installations and general technical and
administrative support for the project during construction, and participation
in commissioning and initial operation, as well as other ITER related
activities, such as those under the Broader Approach Agreement. 
Euratom will continue to participate in the
governance, management and staffing of the ITER Organization and Fusion for
Energy in accordance with the provisions of the agreement establishing the ITER
Organization and the Council Decision establishing Fusion for Energy.
3.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS
WITH THE INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
This proposal takes
full account of the responses to an extensive public consultation based on
the Green Paper 'From Challenges to Opportunities: Towards a Common Strategic
Framework for EU research and innovation funding'[6], within the preparation of the
Euratom Research and Training Programme (2014-2018) contributing to the "Horizon
2020" Framework programme for Research and Innovation. 
ITER was included in this consultation and in the internal and
external evaluations for the drafting of the impact assessment. This impact assessment concluded that the benefits of ITER,
which balance scientific, technical and financial risks, are, in the long term,
the commercial exploitation of fusion energy and, in the near term, the
competitiveness benefits to industry. 
On the basis of the Communication of 29
June 2011, several options for the modalities of
funding the ITER project outside the MFF have been examined. The creation of a
Supplementary Research Programme funded with contributions from Member States
will provide continuity for the project, in particular vis-à-vis our
international partners. It will also avoid a renegotiation process to modify
the ITER Agreement, a complex process surrounded
by uncertainties.
4.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE
PROPOSAL
The legal basis for the
Supplementary Research Programme is provided for by Article 7 of the Euratom
Treaty. The Supplementary Research Programme, with a duration of 5 years, will
be adopted through a specific Council Decision. 
5.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION 
The 'legislative
financial statement' attached to this proposal for a Council Decision sets out
the budgetary implications and the human and administrative resources needed
for the implementation of the Supplementary Research Programme.
2011/0460 (NLE)
Proposal for a
COUNCIL DECISION
on the adoption of a Supplementary
Research Programme 
for the ITER project (2014-2018)
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty establishing
the European Atomic Energy Community, and in particular Article 7 thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
Having regard to the opinion of the
European Parliament[7],
Having regard to the opinion of the
European Economic and Social Committee[8],
Whereas:
(1)              
The Agreement on the Establishment of the ITER
International Fusion Energy Organization for the Joint Implementation of the
ITER Project[9]
(hereinafter the "ITER Agreement") was signed on 21 November 2006 by
the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom), the People's Republic of China,
the Republic of India, Japan, the Republic of Korea, the Russian Federation and
the United States of America. The ITER Agreement establishes the ITER International
Fusion Energy Organization (hereinafter the "ITER Organization"),
which has full responsibility for constructing, operating, exploiting and
de-activating the ITER facilities.
(2)              
The ITER Agreement requires all parties to
provide contributions to the ITER Organization through appropriate legal
entities referred to as "Domestic Agencies". The European Domestic
Agency to discharge Euratom obligations to the ITER Organization has been
established by Council Decision 2007/198/Euratom of 27 March 2007 establishing
the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy and
conferring advantages upon it[10].
(3)              
In the framework of the negotiations to obtain
the support of the other ITER parties to fix the site for ITER in Europe, the Agreement
between the European Atomic Energy Community and the Government of Japan for
the Joint Implementation of the Broader Approach Activities in the Field of
Fusion Energy Research[11]
was concluded in 2007 setting out complementary joint fusion research
activities in the territory of Japan to ensure the
rapid start-up of high performance operation of ITER. The Broader
Approach activities and other ITER related activities are channelled through the
European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy. The funding
of the Broader Approach activities is mainly ensured by in kind contributions
from some members of the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the
Development of Fusion Energy, while the remaining part of the Euratom
contribution is covered by the Euratom budget. 
(4)              
The estimated costs for ITER construction increased
compared to the initial estimates of 2001, on which the ITER Agreement was
based. In its conclusions of 12 July 2010 on ITER status and possible way
forward, the Council of the European Union limited the European contribution to
the ITER construction phase to an amount of EUR 6.6 billion in 2008 value.
According to those conclusions, the European contribution is funded by Euratom
(80%) and by France (20%) and includes construction costs, running costs and
contingencies. As a result of those conclusions, the Commission proposed to
amend the Interinstitutional Agreement of 17 May 2006 on budgetary discipline
and sound financial management as regards the multiannual framework[12] (MFF) for the period 2007-2013
to provide additional funds for ITER for the period of 2012-2013. 
(5)              
For the period after 2013 the Commission in its
communication “A Budget for Europe 2020”[13] proposed
to fund the ITER project outside the MFF. Therefore a Supplementary Research
Programme for the ITER project should be established for the period of 2014 to
2018. 
(6)              
The Supplementary Research Programme for the
ITER project should be funded by contributions from the Member States based on a
call rate applied to each Member State's Gross National Income (GNI) as defined
for the purpose of calculating the GNI own resource contribution to the General
Budget of the European Union. Those contributions shall be made to the General Budget
of the European Union, and shall be assigned to that Programme.
Third countries which have concluded a cooperation agreement with Euratom in
the field of controlled nuclear fusion that associates their respective
research programmes with the Euratom programmes should also be able to contribute
to that Programme.
(7)              
The financial interests of the Union should be
protected through proportionate measures throughout the expenditure cycle,
including the prevention, detection and investigation of irregularities, the
recovery of funds lost, wrongly paid or incorrectly used and, where
appropriate, penalties.
(8)              
The Scientific and Technical Committee provided
to the Commission its opinion concerning the Euratom Research and Training
Programme (2014-2018) contributing to the "Horizon 2020" Framework Programme
for Research and Innovation. The scientific and technical content of ITER
activities are unchanged in this Supplementary Research Programme. 
HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION: 
Article 1
The Supplementary Research Programme for
the ITER project is established for the period from 1 January 2014 to 31
December 2018 (hereinafter the "Programme"). It shall finance
activities necessary to provide the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom)
contribution to the ITER Organization, including those activities necessary for
constructing, operating and exploiting the ITER facilities as well as ITER related
activities. The scientific and technological objective, rationale and
activities of the Programme are set out in the Annex. 
Article 2
The Programme shall be financed through a
maximum contribution of EUR 2,573 million (in current
values) according to Article 3.
Article 3
The Programme shall be funded by
contributions of the Member States, based on a call rate applied to each Member
State's Gross National Income (GNI) as defined for the purposes of calculating
GNI own resource contribution to the General Budget of the European Union. Those
contributions shall be considered as external assigned revenue for the
Programme in accordance with [Article XX of Regulation
(EU) No XX/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council [New Financial
Regulation][14]
.
Article 4
Third countries which have concluded a cooperation
agreement with Euratom in the field of controlled nuclear fusion that associates
their respective research programmes with the Euratom programmes (hereinafter
"associated countries") may also contribute to the Programme.
The contribution of associated countries
shall be determined in the respective cooperation agreement with Euratom in the
field of controlled nuclear fusion.
Article 5
The Programme shall be implemented by the
Commission in accordance with Regulation (EU) No XXXX/2012 [New Financial
Regulation]. 
The Commission
may entrust the implementation to the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and
the Development of Fusion Energy[15] in accordance with [Article XX of Regulation (EU) No
XXXX/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council [New Financial Regulation].
Article 6
1. The Commission shall take appropriate
measures ensuring that, when actions financed under this Decision are
implemented, the financial interests of the Union are protected by the
application of preventive measures against fraud, corruption and any other
illegal activities, by effective checks and, where irregularities are detected,
by the recovery of the amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by
effective, proportionate and deterrent penalties.
2. The Commission or its representatives
and the Court of Auditors shall have the power of audit, on the basis of
documents and on-the-spot checks and inspections, over all grant beneficiaries,
contractors, subcontractors and other third parties who have received Union
funds under this Decision.
The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) may
carry out on-the-spot checks and inspections on economic operators concerned
directly or indirectly by such funding in accordance with the procedures laid
down in Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 with a view to establishing
whether there has been fraud, corruption or any other illegal activity
affecting the financial interests of the Union in connection with a grant
agreement or grant decision or a contract concerning Union funding.
Without prejudice to the first and second
subparagraphs, cooperation agreements with third countries and international
organisations, grant agreements, grant decisions and contracts resulting from
the implementation of this Decision shall expressly empower the Commission, the
Court of Auditors and the OLAF to conduct audits, on-the-spot checks and
inspections.
Article 7
This Decision shall enter into force on the
third day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the
European Union. 
It shall apply from 1 January 2014.
Article 7
This
Decision is addressed to the Member States.
Done at Brussels,
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
ANNEX
SCIENTIFIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL OBJECTIVE, RATIONALE AND ACTIVITIES OF
THE SUPPLEMENTARY RESEARCH PROGRAMME FOR THE ITER PROJECT
Scientific and technological Objective
The objective of the Supplementary Research
Programme for the ITER project shall be to implement ITER as a major step
towards the creation of prototype reactors for fusion power stations that are
safe, sustainable, environmentally responsible, and economically viable. 
The first priority of the strategy to
achieve the objective shall be the construction of ITER (a major experimental
facility which demonstrates the scientific and technical feasibility of fusion
power), followed by the construction of a demonstration fusion power plant.
Rationale
Fusion has the potential to make a major
contribution to the realisation of a sustainable and secure energy supply for
the Union a few decades from now. Its successful development would provide
energy which is safe, sustainable and environmentally friendly. 
The global dimension of
fusion R&D is embodied in the agreement establishing the International
Fusion Energy Organisation for the ITER Project and in the Agreement between
the Government of Japan and Euratom for the Broader Approach Activities in the
Field of Fusion Energy Research, which are complementary to the ITER
activities.
Activities 
The Supplementary Research Programme for
the ITER project will provide the Euratom contribution to activities of the
European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion Energy
(Fusion for Energy), as set out in the Council Decision of 27 March 2007
(2007/198/Euratom).
The activities of Fusion for Energy, for
the period 2014 – 2018, shall be as follow:
(a) To provide the Euratom contribution to
the ITER International Fusion Energy Organisation, including those R&D
activities necessary for developing the basis for the procurement of the ITER
components and the procurement of the ITER Test Blanket Modules;
(b) To provide the Euratom contribution to
Broader Approach Activities with Japan;
(c) As appropriate, other activities in
order to prepare the basis for the design of a demonstration reactor and
related facilities.
The functioning of Fusion for Energy, its
management and staffing as well as the general technical and administrative
support are also covered by the Supplementary Research Programme for the ITER
project.
The detailed work programmes implementing
the above activities will be decided, on an annual basis, by the Fusion for
Energy Governing Board.
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT
1.           FRAMEWORK
OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
              1.1.    Title of the
proposal/initiative 
              1.2.    Policy
area(s) concerned in the ABM/ABB structure
              1.3.    Nature
of the proposal/initiative 
              1.4.    Objective(s)

              1.5.    Grounds
for the proposal/initiative 
              1.6.    Duration
and financial impact 
              1.7.    Management
method(s) envisaged 
2.           MANAGEMENT
MEASURES 
              2.1.    Monitoring
and reporting rules 
              2.2.    Management
and control system 
              2.3.    Measures
to prevent fraud and irregularities 
3.           ESTIMATED
FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
              3.1.    Heading(s)
of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected 
              3.2.    Estimated
impact on expenditure 
              3.2.1. Summary
of estimated impact on expenditure 
              3.2.2. Estimated
impact on operational appropriations 
              3.2.3. Estimated
impact on appropriations of an administrative nature
              3.2.4. Compatibility
with the current multiannual financial framework
              3.2.5. Third-party
participation in financing 
              3.3.    Estimated impact
on revenue
LEGISLATIVE FINANCIAL STATEMENT

1.                      
FRAMEWORK OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
1.1.                
Title of the proposal/initiative 

Council Decision on the adoption of a Supplementary Research
Programme for ITER (2014-2018) 

1.2.                
Policy area(s) concerned in
the ABM/ABB structure[16] 

- XX XX ITER 

1.3.                
Nature of the
proposal/initiative 

¨ The proposal/initiative relates to a
new action 
¨ The proposal/initiative relates to a new action
following a pilot project/preparatory action[17] 
ý The
proposal/initiative relates to the extension of an existing action 
¨ The proposal/initiative relates to an action redirected
towards a new action 

1.4.                
Objectives
1.4.1.          
The Commission's multiannual
strategic objective(s) targeted by the proposal/initiative 

The Supplementary Research Programme for ITER ("the Programme")
shall have the general objective of contributing to the long-term
decarbonisation of the energy system in a safe, efficient and secure way. The Programme
will contribute to the Europe 2020 strategy and to the ‘Innovation Union’
flagship by supporting the mobilisation of European high-tech industries which
will gain new skills and manufacturing capabilities through participation in
Fusion for Energy (F4E) procurement contracts.

1.4.2.          
Specific objective(s) and
ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned for indirect actions

To provide the Euratom contribution to the ITER Organization, for
the construction, operation and exploitation of the ITER facilities, as well as
for ITER related activities.
ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned: 

1.4.3.          
Specific objective(s) and
ABM/ABB activity(ies) concerned for JRC Direct Actions 

NA

1.4.4.          
Expected result(s) and
impact

Specify
the effects which the proposal/initiative should have on the
beneficiaries/groups targeted.
The Supplementary Research Programme will result in Europe making
its contributions to the successful construction of the ITER device within the
framework of an international collaboration. Since Europe is making the largest
contribution to the project (45% of the construction costs) the impacts of the
Programme will be greatest in Europe. These impacts will be both near term
(competitiveness benefits to European industry) and long term (a leading role
for Europe in the commercial exploitation of fusion energy).
The project is already having a positive impact on industrial
competitiveness and job creation due to the nature of the ITER activities
(procurement of high tech components or buildings), which require industrial
contributions in civil, mechanical, electrical, materials and nuclear
engineering combined in unprecedented conditions. More than three quarters of
the overall Community contribution to ITER will result in contracts with
private companies. The creation of new jobs in Europe directly due to ITER
activities will be significant because a large fraction of the expenditure is
for R&D and engineering tasks which are more labour intensive than
conventional manufacturing.
In the long term ITER presents a unique opportunity for European
high tech industry and construction companies to establish a global competitive
advantage and become a leading actor in the design of the first generation of
fusion power plants and the subsequent international commercialisation.

1.4.5.          
Indicators of results and
impact 

Specify
the indicators for monitoring implementation of the proposal/initiative.
The indicators which will measure progress in the European
contributions to ITER construction will be the achievement of milestones by
F4E, the European Joint Undertaking with the task of procuring components and
providing them as "in kind" contributions to ITER during the
construction phase of the project.
F4E has identified in its project plan major milestones covering all
its procurement activities during ITER construction. The overall planning and
annual Work Programme of F4E specify the timetable for the achievement of these
milestones, and regular reports to its governance body (the Governing Board)
and the EU Council provide information on progress.

1.5.                
Grounds for the proposal/initiative
1.5.1.          
Requirement(s) to be met in
the short or long term 

Through its Communication of 29 June 2011 “A Budget for Europe
2020”, the Commission proposed to fund the EU contribution to the ITER project
outside the Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF) after 2013. This
Supplementary Research Programme will implement this proposal.

1.5.2.          
Added value of EU
involvement

The risk, costs, and long-term nature of a project such as ITER puts
it beyond the reach of individual Member States and even of the EU as such. Thus,
the establishment of a global framework has been deemed necessary to undertake
this project. In order to take part to this international endeavor, action at
European level shares risk and generates a breadth of scope and economies of
scale that could not otherwise be achieved. 

1.5.3.          
Lessons learned from similar
experiences in the past

The Joint European Torus (JET) project has demonstrated that
building and operating a large fusion research infrastructure under the
coordination of Euratom is efficient and maximises the scientific and
industrial benefits. However, the scale required for the construction of ITER
is unprecedented and requires a collaboration at global level for which there
is no example to be found in the past.

1.5.4.          
Coherence and possible synergy
with other relevant instruments

The Programme will establish synergies and complementarities with
fusion research activities and in the future Euratom research programme
complementing Horizon 2020 (2014-2018). In particular, actions to be undertaken
in this framework will provide important scientific contribution to the
construction and operation of ITER and constitute important risk-mitigation
measures. The results of fusion research activities under the Euratom research
Framework Programme for 2012-2013 will also make an important contribution to
activities under the Programme.

1.6.                
Duration and financial
impact 

ý Proposal/initiative of limited duration 
–      ý  Proposal/initiative in effect from 01/01/2014 to
31/12/2018 
–      ý  Financial impact from 2014 to 2026
¨ Proposal/initiative of unlimited duration
–      Implementation with a start-up period from YYYY
to YYYY,
–      followed by full-scale operation.

1.7.                
Management mode(s) envisaged[18] 

ý Centralised direct management by the Commission 
ý Centralised indirect management with the delegation of implementation tasks to:
–      ¨  executive agencies 
–      ý  bodies set up by the Communities[19] 
–      ¨  national public-sector bodies/bodies with public-service
mission 
–      ¨  persons entrusted with the implementation of specific
actions pursuant to Title V of the Treaty on European Union and identified in
the relevant basic act within the meaning of Article 49 of the Financial
Regulation 
¨ Shared
management with the Member
States 
¨ Decentralised
management with third countries

¨ Joint
management with international
organisations (to be specified)
If more
than one management mode is indicated, please provide details in the ‘Comments’
section.
Comments: 
Management will be through the services of the Commission and
through the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of Fusion
Energy ("Fusion for Energy" – F4E). The Commission represents Euratom
in the high level instances of both the ITER Organization (IO) and F4E.

2.                      
MANAGEMENT MEASURES

The Programme will be implemented through F4E, which channels the
Euratom contribution to the ITER Project and the Euratom contribution to other
activities related to ITER, such as the Broader Approach activities with Japan.
The Commission participates in the decision-making bodies of F4E and
of the ITER Organization.
At the international level the Commission represents Euratom in the
decision-making body of IO, the ITER Council, and participates in the
Scientific and Technical Advisory Committee (STAC) and in the Management
Advisory Committee of the ITER Council (MAC). 
As regards F4E's governance and management, the Commission is a
member of Fusion for Energy and participates, on behalf of Euratom, in the
bodies governing this Joint Undertaking, i.e. the Governing Board, the
Executive Committee, the Technical Advisory Panel, the Administration and
Finance Committee and the “Bureau”. 

2.1.                
Monitoring and reporting
rules

A monitoring system is in place to ensure the highest quality
outputs and most efficient use of resources. Monitoring and reporting are based
on the management and reporting rules that are applied by F4E and the IO, which
require the approval of all key documents by the governance bodies. Through
these bodies, the Commission monitors and revises the documents governing the
activities to implement the ITER Project, such as the Work Programmes, Annual
activity report, the Project Plans, the Resources Estimates Plans, the Staff
Policy Plans, the Budgets, the Accounts, etc..
F4E is setting up a project management and reporting process, fully
integrating various aspects of the reporting system to the GB.
Every year and in line with the Council conclusions of 12 July 2010
(Draft 11902/10 RECH 255 ATO 38 BUDGET 45; adoption 11821/10 ADD 1), F4E
reports to the Council on the progress achieved in implementing the cost containment
and savings plan as well as on the performance and management of the Joint
Undertaking and the ITER project, including the fulfillment of the schedule
activities within its annual budget.
In response of these Council conclusions, Fusion for Energy has
appointed an independent expert who will assess the project progress on the
basis of existing reports and will submit its opinion of the F4E GB and to the
Competitiveness Council once a year.
In addition, F4E and the Commission have signed an Administrative
Agreement which defines the modalities and conditions applicable to the
transfer by the Commission of the Community financial contribution to F4E.

2.2.                
Management and control
system

The Commission participates in the decision-making bodies of the IO
and also in the governing bodies of F4E. 
At the level of the Commission, the services of the DG in charge of
the Joint Undertaking will follow and revise all initiatives needed to
implement efficiently the ITER project, in particular those of a financial nature.

Also, the Commission's Internal Audit Service (IAS) will act as
Internal Auditor of F4E as from 2012, under the modalities agreed between the
Directorate General of the IAS and F4E.
Also, the European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) enjoys the same powers
with respect to F4E and its staff as it enjoys in respect of Commission
departments.
As regards the governance of Fusion for Energy, at the end of May
2011, F4E's GB at the initiative of the Commission adopted a set of measures to
improve the governance and management of F4E. These set of measures included
the establishment of the AFC to provide comments and recommendations to the GB
on administrative and financial matters; a “Bureau” that prepares the work and
decisions of the GB and the revision of the role of the ExCo that will focus on
the F4E’s upstream procurement activities. 
In addition, a newly appointed Director has put in place as from the
1st of January 2011, a new organisational structure to have a more
project-oriented organisation with on a strong financial service.
F4E's Financial Regulation is similar to the Commission's Financial
Regulation, including public procurement procedures equivalent to the
Commission's standards. F4E's contracts, in line with its Financial Regulation,
include the necessary provisions for supervision and control of the use of
F4E's budget. Following opinions of the Court of Auditors, F4E has revised its
Financial Regulation to take into account the main recommendations from the
Court.
F4E is accountable to its GB and the European Parliament, the latter
providing the annual discharge for the budget, based on a recommendation by the
Council. In addition, F4E is audited twice a year by the European Court of
Auditors that provides a report to the Commission, the Council and the
Parliament as part of the annual discharge. For joint
management activities between F4E and ITER (like joint procurements), the
Commission will continue to ensure that accounting, internal control, audit and
public procurement procedures of partners are compatible with EU rules and
standards. Recommendations from past audits by the Court of Auditors are taken
into account.

2.2.1.          
Internal control framework 

The internal control framework is built on:
1. The Internal Control Standards of the Commission which are
applied by the Directorate General in charge of the ITER project when adopting
any decision concerning F4E, in particular those having a financial nature;
2. The Internal Control Standards that F4E is putting in place to
implement systematic surveillance exercisesand follow-up the implementation of
the resulting recommendations. Seconded Commission staff members have provided
their support in order to assist F4E with the implementation of the Internal
Control Action plan, the establishment of check lists, the implementation of a
regular surveillance mechanism and budget management. 
3. Technical, financial and political review by the Commission of
F4E's and ITER activities throughout every step of the project;
4. Ex-ante checks for the procurement and ex-post controls. Risks
are assessed regularly and progress in the execution of work and the
consumption of resources is monitored regularly, based on defined objectives
and indicators.
2.2.2.     Expected level of risk of
non-compliance 
There is an inherent financial risk in F4E due to the nature of its
activities (large and complex in-kind procurements with high technical risks).
Measures to monitor and better control the functioning of F4E have been put in
place and the reorganization of F4E's structure should also alleviate this
situation. 
The Commission will continue to identify the risks related to the
implementation of this project, notably in terms of costs, and will take the
most appropriate measures to manage and mitigate these risks. 
2.3.        Measures to prevent fraud
and irregularities
The Commission's Directorate General charged with the implementation
of the ITER project and budget is determined to fight against fraud at all
stages of the project implementation in line with the Commission Anti-fraud strategy
COM(2011)376 of 24 June 2011.
The administrative monitoring of the contracts, grants and related
payments is under the responsibility of F4E. The Commission and F4E pay
particular attention to cost containment.
The Commission and the Joint Undertaking take into account the
financial interests of the European Union notably in compliance with Council
Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 2988/95 of 18 December 1995 on the protection
of the European Communities’ financial interests and Article 53(a) of the Financial
Regulation. 
They shall take appropriate measures
ensuring that, when actions financed under this  Decision are implemented, the
financial interests of the Union are protected by the application of preventive
measures against fraud, corruption and any other illegal activities, by
effective checks and, if irregularities are detected, by the recovery of the
amounts wrongly paid and, where appropriate, by effective, proportionate and
deterrent penalties.
Fusion for Energy has started to develop an ex-post audit strategy
to be implemented in 2012. This strategy is a key control aiming to assess the
legality and regularity of the underlying transactions.
The European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF) enjoys the same powers with
respect to F4E and its staff, as it enjoys in respect of Commission
departments. 
OLAF may carry out on-the-spot checks and inspections on economic
operators concerned directly or indirectly by EU funding in accordance with the
procedures laid down in Council Regulation (Euratom, EC) No 2185/96 of 11
November 1996 with a view to establishing whether there has been fraud,
corruption or any other illegal activity in connection with
a grant agreement or grant decision or a contract concerning Union funding.
3.           ESTIMATED
FINANCIAL IMPACT OF THE PROPOSAL/INITIATIVE 
3.1.        Heading(s)
of the multiannual financial framework and expenditure budget line(s) affected 
·      Existing expenditure budget lines 
In order of multiannual financial framework headings and
budget lines.
 Heading of multiannual financial framework: || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution 
 Number: 08 01 xx || Diff./non-diff ([20]) || from EFTA[21] countries || from candidate countries[22] || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 18(1)(aa) of the Financial Regulation 
 Outside MFF || 08 01 04 40 Fusion For Energy || Non-diff. || NO || NO || YES || YES 
·      New budget lines requested 
In
order
of multiannual financial framework headings and budget lines.
 Heading of multiannual financial framework || Budget line || Type of expenditure || Contribution 
 Outside the Multiannual Financial Framework || Diff./non-diff. || from EFTA countries || from candidate countries || from third countries || within the meaning of Article 18(1)(aa) of the Financial Regulation 
 H1/outside MFF || 08 01 XX 01 Expenditure related to Staff* 08 01 XX 02 Expenditure related to External Staff* 08 01 XX 03 Other management expenditure* 08 06 01 xx ITER related expenditure || Diff./non-diff. || NO || NO || YES || YES 
*- The precise
numbering of the budget lines will be defined at later stage.
3.2.        Estimated
impact on expenditure 
3.2.1.     Summary
of estimated impact on expenditure 
In current prices - EUR million (to 3
decimal places)
   ||   || Outside the Multiannual Financial Framework 
   ||   ||   || Year 2014[23] || Year 2015 || Year 2016 || Year 2017 || Year 2018 || >2018 || TOTAL || 
  Operational appropriations outside the MFF ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 Number of budget line. 08 06 01 xx ITER || Commitments || (1) || 897.230 || 631.578 || 285.383 || 282.081 || 253.262 || - || 2,349.534 ||
 Payments || (2) || 107.000 || 306.140 || 405.263 || 304.368 || 353.455 || 873.308 || 2,349.534 || 
 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for ITER programme[24] ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||
 Number of budget line. 08 01 04 40 F4E Staff ||   || (3) || 43.000 || 43.860 || 44.737 || 45.632 || 46.545 || - || 223.774 ||
 TOTAL appropriations Outside MFF || Commitments || =1+1a +3 || 940.230 || 675.438 || 330.120 || 327.713 || 299.807 ||   || 2,573.308 || 
 Payments || =2+2a +3 || 150.000 || 350.000 || 450.000 || 350.000 || 400.000 ||   873,308   || 2,573.308 || 
   ||   || Heading 1 
 DG:   ||   ||   || Year 2014[25] || Year 2015 || Year 2016 || Year 2017 || Year 2018 || >2018 || TOTAL 
  Operational appropriations ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Number of budget line || Commitments || (1) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (2) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Number of budget line || Commitments || (1a) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments || (2a) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes[26] ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Number of budget line 08 01 XX 01 08 01 XX 02 08 01 XX 03 ||   || (3) || 6.350 0.960 2.559 || 6.477 0.979 2.610 || 6.606 0.999 2.662 || 6.738 1.019 2.715 || 6.874 1.039 2.769 ||   || 33.045 4.996 13.315 
 TOTAL appropriations for   || Commitments || =1+1a +3 || 9.869 || 10.066 || 10.267 || 10.472 || 10.682 ||   || 51.356 
 Payments || =2+2a +3 || 9.869 || 10.066 || 10.267 || 10.472 || 10.682 ||   || 51.356 
  TOTAL operational appropriations || Commitments || (4) || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 || 0 ||   || 0 
 Payments || (5) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
  TOTAL appropriations of an administrative nature financed from the envelope for specific programmes || (6) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations under HEADING 1 a of the multiannual financial framework || Commitments ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Payments ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
If more than one heading is affected by
the proposal / initiative: NA
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
   ||   ||   || Year 2014[27] || Year 2015 || Year 2016 || Year 2017 || Year 2018 || >2018 || TOTAL 
 TOTAL appropriations under Heading 1/OUTSIDE MFF || Commitments   || 950.099 || 685.504 || 340.387 || 338.185 || 310.489 ||   ||   2,624.664 
 Payments || 159.869 || 360.066 || 460.267 || 360.472 || 410.682 || 873.308 || 2,624.664 
3.2.2.     Estimated
impact on operational appropriations 
–      ¨  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of
operational appropriations 
–      ý  The proposal/initiative requires the use of operational
appropriations, as explained below:
Commitment appropriations in EUR million (to 3 decimal
places)
 Indicate objectives and outputs   ò ||   ||   || 2014 || 2015 || 2016 || 2017 || 2017+2018 || 2019 || 2020 || TOTAL 
 OUTPUTS 
 Type of output[28] || Average cost of the output || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Number of outputs || Cost || Total number of outputs || Total cost 
 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVE No 1[29]… ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - Output* ||   ||   || 1 || 897.230 || 1 || 631.578 || 1 || 285.383 || 1 || 282.081 || 1 || 253.262 ||   ||   ||   ||   || 5 || 2,349.534 
 Sub-total for specific objective N°1 ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL COST || 1 || 897.230 || 1 || 631.578 || 1 || 285.383 || 1 || 282.081 || 1 || 253.262 ||   ||   ||   ||   || 5 || 2,349.534 
* The output of the
ITER project will be the annual activity report provided by F4E (Barcelona
Agency) in which the advancement of the project is described.
3.2.3.     Estimated
impact on appropriations of an administrative nature
3.2.3.1.  Summary 
–      ¨  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of
administrative appropriations 
–      ý  The proposal/initiative requires the use of
administrative appropriations, as explained below:
EUR
million (to 3 decimal places)
   || Year 2014[30] || Year 2015 || Year 2016 || Year 2017 || Year 2018 || TOTAL 
 HEADING 1 of the multiannual financial framework ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Human resources running the programme || 7.310 || 7.456 || 7.605 || 7.757 || 7.913 || 38.041 
 Other administrative expenditure || 2.559 || 2.610 || 2.662 || 2.715 || 2.769 || 13.315 
 Subtotal HEADING 1 of the multiannual financial framework || 9.869 || 10.066 || 10.267 || 10.472 || 10.682 || 51.356 
   Outside MFF ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Human resources ||   33.996 ||   34.676 ||   35.369 ||   36.077 ||   36.798 ||   176.916 
 Other expenditure of an administrative nature* || 9.004 || 9.184 || 9.368 || 9.555 || 9.747 || 46.858 
   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
*
estimated figures
 TOTAL || 52.869 || 53.926 || 55.004 || 56.104 || 57.227 || 275.130 
3.2.3.2.  Estimated
requirements of human resources 
–      ¨  The proposal/initiative does not require the use of human
resources 
–      ýThe proposal/initiative requires the use of human
resources, as explained below:
Estimate to be expressed in
full amounts (or at most to one decimal place)
   || Year 2014[31] || Year 2015 || Year 2016 || Year 2017 || Year 2018 || TOTAL 
 ||  Establishment plan posts (officials and temporary agents) ITER, to be integrated into s specific establishment plan for ITER in Heading 1 
 At Headquarters || 50 || 50 || 50 || 50 || 50 || 50 
   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 ||  External personnel (in Full Time Equivalent unit: FTE)[32] ITER in Heading 1 || 
 CA, INT, SNE || 15 || 15 || 15 || 15 || 15 || 15 
   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 08 01 04 40[33] || - at Headquarters[34] ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 - (JU ITER-F4E (Barcelona) (*) || 422 || 422 || 422 || 422 || 422 || 422 
 XX 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE - Indirect research) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 10 01 05 02 (CA, INT, SNE - Direct research) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 Other budget lines (specify) ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL || 487 || 487 || 487 || 487 || 487 || 487 
XX is the policy area or budget title concerned.
The needs for human
resources shall be covered within the allocation already granted for managing
this action and/or redeployed within the DG RTD, complemented as the case may
be by any additional allocation that might be granted to the managing DG in the
framework of the annual allocation procedure in the light of budgetary
constraint.
The
administrative cost (including staff) of running the ITER programme (outside
the operating grant to the European Joint Undertaking for ITER (F4E)) should
follow the operational appropriations for the ITER programme itself.
(*) The 422 FTE financed in Budget 2012 under lines
08.01 04 40.
Description
of tasks to be carried out:
 Officials and temporary agents || Staff working in the headquarters are in charge of the definition and subsequent follow-up of the activities both from the domestic agency in Barcelona (F4E) and the ITER project where the Commission is a representative of the European partnership. Staff working in the domestic agency in Barcelona (F4E) are in charge of the European contribution for the procuring, contracting and financial implementation of the work plan of ITER International Organisation as defined in the ITER Council decision 2007/198/Euratom of 27 March 2007. 
 External personnel 
3.2.4.     Compatibility
with the current multiannual financial framework 
–      ¨  Proposal/initiative is compatible the current multiannual
financial framework.
–      ¨  Proposal/initiative will entail reprogramming of the
relevant heading in the multiannual financial framework.
Explain what reprogramming is
required, specifying the budget lines concerned and the corresponding amounts.
–      ¨  Proposal/initiative requires application of the
flexibility instrument or revision of the multiannual financial framework[35].
Explain what is required,
specifying the headings and budget lines concerned and the corresponding
amounts.
3.2.5.     Third-party
contributions 
–      The proposal/initiative does not provide for
co-financing by third parties 
–      ý The proposal/initiative provides for the co-financing
estimated below*:
Appropriations in EUR million (to 3
decimal places)
   || Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … enter as many years as necessary to show the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) || Total 
 Specify the co-financing body ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
 TOTAL appropriations cofinanced ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
* - The programme may receive third countries contributions (based on the
cooperation agreement between the third countries and Euratom) which at this
stage are not known yet.
3.3.        Estimated
impact on revenue 
–      ¨  Proposal/initiative has no financial impact on revenue.
–      ý  Proposal/initiative has the following financial impact:
¨         on own
resources 
ý         on
miscellaneous revenue 
EUR million (to 3 decimal places)
 Budget revenue line: || Appropriations available for the ongoing budget year || Impact of the proposal/initiative[36] 
 Year N || Year N+1 || Year N+2 || Year N+3 || … insert as many columns as necessary in order to reflect the duration of the impact (see point 1.6) 
 Article XXXX ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   ||   
For
miscellaneous assigned revenue, specify the budget expenditure line(s)
affected.
08 01 04 40, 08 06 01 Specify the method for
calculating the impact on revenue.
The Programme shall be funded by contributions of the Member States,
based on the call rate applied to each Member State's  Gross National Income
(GNI) as defined for the purposes of calculating GNI own resource contribution
to the General Budget of the European Union. These contributions shall be, made
to the general budget of the European Union and, shall be considered as external
assigned revenue for the Programme in accordance with Article 18 of Regulation
(EU) No XX/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council [New Financial
Regulation] applicable to the general budget of the European Union.
[1]               Originally denoted as the International Thermonuclear
Experimental Reactor 
[2]           OJ L
358, 16.12.2006, p.62
[3]               OJ L 246, 21.09.2007, p.34
[4]               OJ L 90, 30.03.2007, p.58
[5]               COM (2011) 500 final of
29.06.2011
[6]               COM (2011) 48
[7]               OJ C , , p. .
[8]               OJ C , , p. .
[9]               OJ L 358, 16.12.2006, p. 62.
[10]             OJ L 90, 30.03.2007, p. 58.
[11]             OJ L 246, 21.09.2007, p 34.
[12]             OJ C 139, 14.6.2006, p.1.
[13]             COM (2011) 500 final.
[14]             OJ L 
[15]             Council Decision 2007/198/Euratom of 27 March 2007
establishing the European Joint Undertaking for ITER and the Development of
Fusion Energy (the Joint Undertaking) and conferring advantages upon it
[16]             ABM: Activity-Based
Management – ABB: Activity-Based Budgeting.
[17]             As referred to in Article 49(6)(a) or (b) of the
Financial Regulation.
[18]             Details of management modes
and references to the Financial Regulation may be found on the BudgWeb site: http://www.cc.cec/budg/man/budgmanag/budgmanag_en.html
[19]             As referred to in Article 185 of the Financial
Regulation.
[20]             Diff. = Differentiated appropriations / Non-Diff. =
Non-differentiated appropriations
[21]             EFTA: European Free Trade Association. 
[22]             Candidate countries and, where applicable, potential
candidate countries from the Western Balkans.
[23]             Year N is the year in which implementation of the
proposal/initiative starts.
[24]             Technical and/or administrative assistance and
expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions
(former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.
[25]             Year N is the year in which implementation of the
proposal/initiative starts.
[26]             Technical and/or administrative assistance and
expenditure in support of the implementation of EU programmes and/or actions
(former "BA" lines), indirect research, direct research.
[27]             Year N is the year in which implementation of the
proposal/initiative starts.
[28]             Outputs are products and services to be supplied (e.g.:
number of student exchanges financed, number of km of roads built, etc.).
[29]             As described in Section 1.4.2. "Specific
objective(s)…"
[30]             Year N is the year in which implementation of the
proposal/initiative starts.
[31]             Year N is the year in which implementation of the
proposal/initiative starts.
[32]             CA= Contract Agent; INT= agency staff ("Intérimaire");
JED= "Jeune Expert en Délégation" (Young Experts in Delegations);
LA= Local Agent; SNE= Seconded National Expert; 
[33]             Under the ceiling for external personnel from
operational appropriations (former "BA" lines).
[34]             Essentially for Structural Funds, European Agricultural
Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and European Fisheries Fund (EFF).
[35]             See points 19 and 24 of the Interinstitutional
Agreement.
[36]             As regards traditional own resources (customs duties,
sugar levies), the amounts indicated must be net amounts, i.e. gross amounts
after deduction of 25% for collection costs.