CELEX: 62017TN0550
Language: en
Date: 2017-08-12 00:00:00
Title: Case T-550/17: Action brought on 12 August 2017 — Troszczynski v Parliament

23.10.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 357/23
            
         Action brought on 12 August 2017 — Troszczynski v Parliament
   (Case T-550/17)
   (2017/C 357/31)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Mylène Troszczynski (Noyon, France) (represented by: F. Wagner, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Parliament
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the European Parliament of 14 June 2017 on the request for the waiver of immunity of Mylène Troszczynski 2017/2019(IMM);
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the European Parliament to pay to Mylène Troszczynski the amount of EUR 35 000 by way of compensation for the non-material damage which she has suffered;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the European Parliament to pay to Mylène Troszczynski the amount of EUR 5 000 by way of reimbursement of recoverable costs;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the European Parliament to pay all costs in the proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
   
               1.
            
            
               First plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 8 of Protocol No 7 on the privileges and immunities of the European Union (OJ 2010 C 83, p. 266) (‘the protocol’).
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 9 of the protocol.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Third plea in law, alleging an infringement of the principle of equality of treatment and of the principle of good administration.
            
         
               4.
            
            
               Fourth plea in law, alleging that the rights of the defence have been infringed and that the contested decision is unlawful.