CELEX: 62020CN0202
Language: en
Date: 2020-05-12 00:00:00
Title: Case C-202/20 P: Appeal brought on 12 May 2020 by Claudio Necci against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 25 March 2020 in Case T-129/19, Necci v Commission

14.9.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 304/5
            
         
      Appeal brought on 12 May 2020 by Claudio Necci against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 25 March 2020 in Case T-129/19, Necci v Commission
      (Case C-202/20 P)
      (2020/C 304/07)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Appellant: Claudio Necci (represented by: S. Orlandi, T. Martin, lawyers)
      
         Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission, European Parliament, Council of the European Union
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The appellant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  set aside the order of 25 March 2020 of the General Court of the European Union in Case T-129/19, Necci v Commission;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  refer the case back to the General Court of the European Union for it to be adjudged afresh;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  reserve the costs.
               
            
         Grounds of appeal and main arguments
      
      The appellant seeks to have aside the order of 25 May 2020 in Case T-129/19, by which the General Court of the European Union dismissed his action for annulment as inadmissible and ordered him to pay the costs.
      The appellant raises three grounds of appeal in that regard:
      The first ground alleges a distortion of the subject matter of the dispute in so far as the General Court of the European Union took the view that the decision of 18 July 2011 adversely affected the appellant.
      The second ground of appeal alleges infringement of his right to effective legal protection in so far as, if his appeal is inadmissible, the applicant will have no remedy to challenge the fact that he no longer enjoys any social protection, despite the fact that he has worked for his whole life.
      The third ground of appeal alleges infringement of the principle of single applicable legislation in so far as the General Court of the European Union held that the loss of all social protection in Italy following the transfer ‘follows from the legal norms specific to the national law at issue and … has no bearing whatsoever on his situation in respect of the JSIS’.