CELEX: 62014TN0789
Language: en
Date: 2014-11-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-789/14: Action brought on 28 November 2014 — Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen v OHIM — Meissen Keramik (MEISSEN)

20.4.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 127/29
            
         Action brought on 28 November 2014 — Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen v OHIM — Meissen Keramik (MEISSEN)
   (Case T-789/14)
   (2015/C 127/41)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen GmbH (Meißen, Germany) (represented by: O. Spuhler and M. Geitz, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Meissen Keramik GmbH (Meißen, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘MEISSEN’ — Application No 9 413 527
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2014 in Cases R 1182/2013-4 and R 1245/2013-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the defendant to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009.