CELEX: C2005/093/51
Language: en
Date: 2005-04-16 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 15 February 2005 in Case T-296/02 Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition — Likelihood of confusion — Application for Community word mark LINDENHOF — Earlier word and figurative mark LINDERHOF — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

16.4.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 93/26
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 15 February 2005
   in Case T-296/02 Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition - Likelihood of confusion - Application for Community word mark LINDENHOF - Earlier word and figurative mark LINDERHOF - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2005/C 93/51)
   Language of the case: German
   In Case T-296/02: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG, established in Neckarsulm (Germany), represented by P. Groß, lawyer, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: A. von Mühlendahl, B. Müller and G. Schneider), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the Court of First Instance, being REWE-Zentral AG, established in Cologne (Germany), represented by M. Kinkeldey, lawyer — action against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 July 2002 (Case R 0036/2002-3), relating to opposition proceedings between Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG and REWE-Zentral AG — the Court of First Instance (Second Chamber), composed of J. Pirrung, President, A.W.H. Meij and N.J. Forwood, Judges; I. Natsinas, Administrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 15 February 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 289, 23.11.2002.