CELEX: 62011CN0237
Language: en
Date: 2011-05-19 00:00:00
Title: Case C-237/11: Action brought on 19 May 2011 — French Republic v European Parliament

30.7.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 226/12
            
         Action brought on 19 May 2011 — French Republic v European Parliament
   (Case C-237/11)
   2011/C 226/24
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: French Republic (represented by: E. Belliard, G. de Bergues and A. Adam, Agents)
   
      Defendant: European Parliament
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the vote of the European Parliament of 9 March 2011 concerning the calendar of session periods of the Parliament for 2012;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the European Parliament to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The applicant relies on a single plea in law in support of its action alleging, first, infringement of Protocol No 6 on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union, annexed to the TFEU, and of Protocol No 3 on the location of the seats of the institutions and of certain bodies, offices, agencies and departments of the European Union, annexed to the EAEC Treaty and, second, failure to comply with the judgment of the Court in Case C-345/95 France v Parliament [1997] ECR I-5235.
   According to the French Government, by laying down that two of the twelve periods of monthly plenary sessions which must take place in Strasbourg every year will be shortened from 4 to 2 days and will take place, in 2012, during the same week of October, the European Parliament has sought to circumvent the rule according to which the twelve periods of monthly plenary sessions, including the budget session, must take place in Strasbourg. The contested vote amounts, in practice, to the abolition of one of the twelve periods of monthly plenary sessions which must take place in Strasbourg every year. Its only objective is thus to reduce the length of time members of the European Parliament spend at the seat of the European Parliament, which is not justified by any requirement relating to the internal organisation of the Parliament’s work.