CELEX: 62020TB0079
Language: en
Date: 2021-07-14 00:00:00
Title: Case T-79/20: Order of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — AI v ECDC (Action for annulment and for damages — Civil service — ECDC staff — Psychological harassment — Article 12a of the Staff Regulations — Damage to reputation — Request for assistance — Article 24 of the Staff Regulations — Dismissal of application — Right to be heard — Absence of prima facie evidence — Duty of care — Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)

20.9.2021   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 382/25
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 14 July 2021 — AI v ECDC
      (Case T-79/20) (1)
      
      (Action for annulment and for damages - Civil service - ECDC staff - Psychological harassment - Article 12a of the Staff Regulations - Damage to reputation - Request for assistance - Article 24 of the Staff Regulations - Dismissal of application - Right to be heard - Absence of prima facie evidence - Duty of care - Action in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
      (2021/C 382/36)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: AI (represented by: L. Levi and A. Champetier, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (represented by: A. Iber and J. Mannheim, acting as Agents, and by D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, lawyers)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of ECDC’s decision of 5 April 2019 rejecting the applicant’s request for assistance of 10 April 2018 and, in so far as necessary, of ECDC’s decision of 4 November 2019 rejecting the complaint against the decision of 5 April 2019 and, secondly, compensation for the damage suffered.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The action is dismissed.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  AI is ordered to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 129, 20.4.2020.