CELEX: 62018TN0405
Language: en
Date: 2018-07-03 00:00:00
Title: Case T-405/18: Action brought on 3 July 2018 — Holmer Dahl v SRB

201808030662050952018/C 294/744052018TC29420180820EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180703596022Case T-405/18: Action brought on 3 July 2018 — Holmer Dahl v SRB
 ---documentbreak--- C2942018EN5920120180703EN0074592602Action brought on 3 July 2018 — Holmer Dahl v SRB
   (Case T-405/18)2018/C 294/74Language of the case: Spanish
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Helene Holmer Dahl (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: R. Vallina Hoset, A. Sellés Marco, C. Iglesias Megías and A. Lois Perreau de Pinninck, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Single Resolution Board
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the General Court should:
   
            —
         
         
            Declare that the Single Resolution Board has incurred non-contractual liability and order it to repair the damage suffered by the applicant as a result of both its actions and omissions which deprived the applicant of the BANCO POPULAR ESPAÑOL, S.A. shares she owned;
         
      
            —
         
         
            Order the Board to pay the following amounts to the applicant as compensation for the pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage suffered (‘the amount due’):
            
                     —
                  
                  
                     As compensation for pecuniary damage, the total sum of EUR 160558,41 in respect of the redemption of shares in Banco Popular; and
                  
               
                     —
                  
                  
                     As compensation for non-pecuniary damage, a sum of up to EUR 160558,41 or such amount as the General Court shall see fit to award.
                  
               
      
            —
         
         
            Increase the amount due with corresponding compensatory interest, as of 7 July 2017 until the date of delivery of judgment disposing of the present case;
         
      
            —
         
         
            Increase the amount due with corresponding default interest as of the date of delivery of judgment in the present case until its payment in full of the amount due, at the rate set by the European Central Bank (ECB) for main refinancing operations, increased by two percentage points;
         
      
            —
         
         
            Order the Board to pay the costs.
         
      
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those relied upon in Case T-659/17, Vallina Fonseca v Single Resolution Board (OJ 2017 C 424, p. 42).