CELEX: 62016CA0306
Language: en
Date: 2017-11-09 00:00:00
Title: Case C-306/16: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 November 2017 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto — Portugal) — António Fernando Maio Marques da Rosa v Varzim Sol — Turismo, Jogo e Animação, SA (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Protection of the safety and health of workers — Directive 2003/88/EC — Article 5 — Weekly rest period — National legislation providing for at least one rest day per seven-day period — Periods of more than six consecutive working days)

8.1.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 5/10
            
         Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 November 2017 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto — Portugal) — António Fernando Maio Marques da Rosa v Varzim Sol — Turismo, Jogo e Animação, SA
   (Case C-306/16) (1)
   
   ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 5 - Weekly rest period - National legislation providing for at least one rest day per seven-day period - Periods of more than six consecutive working days))
   (2018/C 005/13)
   Language of the case: Portuguese
   
      Referring court
   
   Tribunal da Relação do Porto
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicant: António Fernando Maio Marques da Rosa
   
      Defendant: Varzim Sol — Turismo, Jogo e Animação, SA
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Article 5 of Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, as amended by Directive 2000/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2000 and the first paragraph of Article 5 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as not requiring the minimum uninterrupted weekly rest period of 24 hours to which a worker is entitled to be provided no later than the day following a period of six consecutive working days, but requires that rest period to be provided within each seven-day period.
   
      (1)  OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.