CELEX: 62010TA0275
Language: en
Date: 2011-11-22 00:00:00
Title: Case T-275/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2011 — mPAY24 v OHIM — Ultra (MPAY24) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community word mark MPAY24 — Absolute grounds for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Correction of the decision by the Board of Appeal — Non-existent act — Rule 53 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

14.1.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 13/13
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2011 — mPAY24 v OHIM — Ultra (MPAY24)
   (Case T-275/10) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community word mark MPAY24 - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Correction of the decision by the Board of Appeal - Non-existent act - Rule 53 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)
   2012/C 13/26
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: mPAY24 GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: H.-G. Zeiner and S. Di Natale, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Ultra d.o.o. Proizvodnja elektronskih naprav (Zagorje ob Savi, Slovenia)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 March 2010 (Case R 1102/2008-1) concerning invalidity proceedings between Ultra d.o.o. Proizvodnja elektronskih naprav and mPAY24 GmbH.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) of 22 March 2010 (Case R 1102/2008-1);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders OHIM to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010.