CELEX: 62014TN0747
Language: en
Date: 2014-11-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-747/14: Action brought on 5 November 2014 — Merck v OHIM — Nestlé (HEALTHPRESSO)

22.12.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 462/32
            
         Action brought on 5 November 2014 — Merck v OHIM — Nestlé (HEALTHPRESSO)
   (Case T-747/14)
   (2014/C 462/44)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany) (represented by: M. Best, U. Pfleghar and S. Schäffner, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Société de Produits Nestlé SA (Vevey, Switzerland)
   
      Details of the proceedings before OHIM
   
   
      Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘HEALTHPRESSO’ — Application for registration No 1 0 0 03  028
   
      Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 August 2014 in Case R 1880/2013-1
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Partially annul the contested decision insofar as the Board of Appeal upheld the opposition and rejected the CTM application for the goods in Class 30;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Reject opposition No B 1 1 91  607;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 96(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 15(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.