CELEX: 62013FA0059
Language: en
Date: 2014-04-09 00:00:00
Title: Case F-59/13: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 April 2014  — Rouffaud v EEAS (Civil Service — Auxiliary member of contract staff — Reclassification of the contract — Pre-litigation procedure — Rule that the complaint must be consistent with the action — Amendment of the grounds of challenge in the case)

26.5.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 159/39
            
         Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 9 April 2014 — Rouffaud v EEAS
   (Case F-59/13) (1)
   
   ((Civil Service - Auxiliary member of contract staff - Reclassification of the contract - Pre-litigation procedure - Rule that the complaint must be consistent with the action - Amendment of the grounds of challenge in the case))
   2014/C 159/53
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Thierry Rouffaud (Ixelles, Belgium) (represented initially by: A. Coolen, É. Marchal, S. Orlandi and D. Abreu Caldas, and subsequently by: S. Orlandi and D. Abreu Caldas, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and M. Silva, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant’s application to have his successive fixed-term employment contracts reclassified as a contract of indefinite duration and to have his period completed as an auxiliary member of the contract staff recognised as a period of service completed as a member of the contract staff.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Tribunal:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Mr Rouffard to bear his own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European External Action Service.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 233, 10.8.2013, p. 14.