CELEX: C1997/228/47
Language: en
Date: 1997-07-26 00:00:00
Title: Action brought on 5 May 1997 by Siegfried Schweikle against the Commission of the European Communities (Case T-153/97)

No C 228/20             EN                    Official Journal of the European Communities                                 26 . 7 . 97
Action brought on 5 May 1997 by Siegfried Schweikle                      Licata, residing in Brussels, Alberto Piazzi, residing at
   against the Commission of the European Communities                    Saint Genese ( Belgium ), Cornelis Pot, residing at
                          ( Case T-153/97)                               Roosendaal NC (Netherlands ), Rita Sacca-George,
                                                                         residing in Brussels, Jacques Simon, residing in Brussels,
                             ( 97/C 228/47 )                             and Harry Waterschoot, residing in Brussels, represented
                                                                         by Marc-Albert Lucas, of the Brussels Bar, with an address
                (Language of the case: French)                           for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Evelyne
                                                                         Korn, 21 Avenue de Nassau .
An action against the Commission of the European
Communities was brought before the Court of First                        The applicants claim that the Court should:
Instance of the European Communities on 5 May 1997 by
Siegfried Schweikle, residing at Strassen ( Luxembourg ),
represented by Nicolas Lhoest, of the Brussels Bar, with an              — annul the Commission's decision rejecting their request
address for service in Luxembourg at the offices of Fidu­                    to be regraded,
ciaire Myson Sari, 30, Rue de Cessange .
                                                                         — annul the Commission's decision rejecting their
The applicant claims that the Court should:                                  administrative complaint,
— annul the Commission's decision of 3 September 1996                    — order the Commission to pay the costs.
     rejecting the applicant's request that it give
     consideration to the possible application of
                                                                         Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:
     Article 31 ( 2 ) of the Staff Regulations,
— annul, in so far as may be necessary, the Commission's                 The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as in
                                                                         Case T-16/97 (»).
     decision adopted on 3 February 1997 expressly
     rejecting the applicant's complaint,
                                                                         (') OJ No C 74, 8 . 3 . 1997, p . 27.
— order the defendant to pay all the costs.
Pleas in law and main arguments adduced in support:
                                                                         Action brought on 9 May 1997 by Achim Berge against
The pleas in law and main arguments are the same as in                          the Commission of the European Communities
Case T-16/97 ( M.
                                                                                                  ( Case T-156/97 )
(>) OJ No C 74, 8 . 3 . 1997, p. 27.                                                                ( 97/C 228/49
                                                                                        (Language of the case: German)
                                                                         An action against the Commission of the European
Action brought on 6 May 1997 by Patricia Brunko­                          Communities was brought before the Court of First
Metzger and others against the Commission of the                         Instance of the European Communities on 9 May 1997 by
                      European Communities                               Achim Berge, residing in Freiburg ( Federal Republic of
                                                                          Germany ), represented by Dr Miiller-Heidelberg, Rechts­
                           ( Case T-154/97 )                              anwalt, Bingen ( Federal Republic of Germany), with an
                              ( 97/C 228/48 )                             address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of
                                                                          Charles Duro, 4 Boulevard Royal .
                 (Language of the case: French)
                                                                         The applicant claims that the Court should:
 An action against the Commission of the European
 Communities was brought before the Court of First                        — annul the Commission decision rejecting ( impliedly, in
 Instance of the European Communities on 6 May 1997 by                        accordance with Article 2 (4 ), second subpararaph, of
 Patricia Brunko-Metzger, residing in Brussels, Mariette                      Decision 94/90/ECSC, EC, Euratom ), the applicant's
 Colinet, residing in Brussels, Christiane Degueldre,                         request of 19 December 1996 for access to documents,
 residing at Wemmel ( Belgium ), Nicole Dumont, residing at
 Ath ( Belgium ), Emile Espagnet, residing at Aalst
 ( Belgium ), Paul Fraix, residing at La Bouverie ( Belgium ),            — declare that, pursuant to Article 184 of the EC Treaty,
 Georgios Katalagarianakis, residing at Overijse ( Belgium ),                 the constructive refusal provided for in Article 2 (4 ),
 Danielle Lardinois, residing in Brussels, Carlos Alberto                     second subparagraph, of Decision 94/90/ECSC, EC,
 Leite Mateus, residing at Zaventem ( Belgium ), Liborio                      Euratom is consequently inapplicable,