CELEX: 62010CA0382
Language: en
Date: 2011-10-06 00:00:00
Title: Case C-382/10: Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien (Austria)) — Erich Albrecht, Thomas Neumann, Van-Ly Sundara, Alexander Svoboda, Stefan Toth v Landeshauptmann von Wien (Industrial Policy — Food hygiene — Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 — Self-service retail of bread and bakery products)

26.11.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 347/5
            
         Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 October 2011 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien (Austria)) — Erich Albrecht, Thomas Neumann, Van-Ly Sundara, Alexander Svoboda, Stefan Toth v Landeshauptmann von Wien
   (Case C-382/10) (1)
   
   (Industrial Policy - Food hygiene - Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 - Self-service retail of bread and bakery products)
   2011/C 347/06
   Language of the case: German
   
      Referring court
   
   Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien
   
      Parties to the main proceedings
   
   
      Applicants: Erich Albrecht, Thomas Neumann, Van-Ly Sundara, Alexander Svoboda, Stefan Toth
   
      Defendant: Landeshauptmann von Wien
   
      Re:
   
   Reference for a preliminary ruling — Unabhängiger Verwaltungssenat Wien — Interpretation of paragraph 3 of Chapter IX of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs (OJ 2004 L 139, p. 1) — Protection of foodstuffs against contamination — Self-service retail of bread and bakery products — Administrative decision by a Member State ordering the installation of a technical device preventing customers from replacing goods after having touched them by hand
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   Paragraph 3 of Chapter IX of Annex II to Regulation (EC) No 852/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the hygiene of foodstuffs must be interpreted as meaning that, in circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, with regard to containers used for self-service retail of bread and bakery products, the fact that a potential purchaser could conceivably have touched the foodstuffs offered for sale by hand or sneezed on them does not make it possible, on that basis alone, to hold that those foodstuffs were not protected against any contamination likely to render them unfit for human consumption, injurious to health or contaminated in such a way that it would be unreasonable to expect them to be consumed in that state.
   
      (1)  OJ C 274, 9.10.2010.