CELEX: 62019CN0585
Language: en
Date: 2019-08-02 00:00:00
Title: Case C-585/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 2 August 2019 — Academia de Studii Economice din București v Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operațional Capital Uman — Ministerul Educației Naționale

2.12.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 406/8
            
         
      Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul București (Romania) lodged on 2 August 2019 — Academia de Studii Economice din București v Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operațional Capital Uman — Ministerul Educației Naționale
      (Case C-585/19)
      (2019/C 406/13)
      Language of the case: Romanian
      
         Referring court
      
      Tribunalul București
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Academia de Studii Economice din București
      
         Defendant: Organismul Intermediar pentru Programul Operațional Capital Uman — Ministerul Educației Naționale
      
         Questions referred
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Should ‘working time’, as defined in Article 2(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC, (1) be understood as meaning ‘any period during which the worker is working, at the employer’s disposal and carrying out his activity or duties’ under a single (full-time) contract or under all (employment) contracts concluded by that worker?
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Should the requirements imposed on Member States by Article 3 of Directive 2003/88/EC (obligation to take the measures necessary to ensure that each worker enjoys at least 11 consecutive hours’ rest per 24-hour period) and by Article 6(b) of that directive (establishing a maximum weekly working time limit of 48 hours, on average, including overtime) be interpreted as introducing limits with regard to one single contract or with regard to all the contracts concluded with the same employer or with different employers?
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  In the event that the answers to Questions 1 and 2 involve an interpretation which is such as to exclude the possibility of the Member States being able to regulate, at national level, the application per contract of Article 3 and Article 6(b) of Directive 2003/88/EC, where there are no provisions of national legislation governing the fact that the minimum daily rest and the maximum weekly working time are to relate to the worker (regardless of how many employment contracts are concluded with the same employer or with different employers), is a public institution of a Member State, which acts on behalf of the State, in a position to rely on the direct application of Article 3 and Article 6(b) of Directive 2003/88/EC and to penalise the employer for failure to observe the limits laid down by that directive as regards daily rest and/or the maximum weekly working time?
               
            
         (1)  Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9).