CELEX: 62019TN0607
Language: en
Date: 2019-09-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-607/19: Action brought on 5 September 2019 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK)

4.11.2019   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 372/34
            
         
      Action brought on 5 September 2019 — Itinerant Show Room v EUIPO (FAKE DUCK)
      (Case T-607/19)
      (2019/C 372/35)
      Language of the case: Italian
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Itinerant Show Room Srl (San Giorgio in Bosco, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark FAKE DUCK — Application for registration No. 17 946 879
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 July 2019 in Case R 830/2019-2
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order EUIPO to pay the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Failure to take into account the inherent distinctive character of the mark FAKE DUCK;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Failure to take into account the complexity of the mark FAKE DUCK and the picture of an egg;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Misapplication of the principle of equal treatment;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Misapplication of the principle of legality.