CELEX: 62014TN0549
Language: en
Date: 2014-07-25 00:00:00
Title: Case T-549/14: Action brought on 25 July 2014 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Horno del Espinar (Castello)

6.10.2014   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 351/15
            
         Action brought on 25 July 2014 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM — Horno del Espinar (Castello)
   (Case T-549/14)
   2014/C 351/17
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Wolter, M. Kefferpütz and A. Marx, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Horno del Espinar, SL (El Espinar, Spain)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) of 22 April 2014 given in joined Cases R 1233/2013-2 and R 1258/2013-2;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order the defendant to pay the costs of proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Community trade mark concerned: The word mark ‘Castello’ for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 31 — Community trade mark application No 6 819 973
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: Numerous earlier Community and national trade marks containing, inter alia, the verbal element ‘Castelló’
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Partially upheld the opposition
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Partially upheld the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.