CELEX: 62018TN0593
Language: en
Date: 2018-09-28 00:00:00
Title: Case T-593/18: Action brought on 28 September 2018 — BS (Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality) v Parliament

26.11.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 427/99
            
         
      Action brought on 28 September 2018 —  BS (1) v Parliament
      (Case T-593/18)
      (2018/C 427/130)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: BS (2) (represented by: M. Maes and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)
      
         Defendant: European Parliament
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the notice of amendment No. 15, dated 10 August 2017, concerning the applicant’s pension rights;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul, so far as necessary, the decision to recover the purported overpayment of EUR 1 589,16 in respect of the months of September, October and November 2017 and EUR 4 815,16 as shown on the pension slip for December 2017;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the Parliament to pay the costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 2 of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union inasmuch as the contested decisions are vitiated by a manifest error of assessment.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to good administration (Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union) in so far as the defendant failed to give adequate reasons for its decision and failed to observe the applicant’s right to be heard and his right to have access to his file.
               
            
         (1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality
      
         (2)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality