CELEX: 62018TA0596
Language: en
Date: 2020-09-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-596/18: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — ZL v EUIPO (Civil service — Recruitment — Notice of competition — Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition — Obligation to state reasons — Rejection of the request for access to the multiple-choice questions asked in the admission tests — Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings)

16.11.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 390/29
            
         
      Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2020 — ZL v EUIPO
      (Case T-596/18) (1)
      
      (Civil service - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Decision not to place the applicant’s name on the reserve list for the competition - Obligation to state reasons - Rejection of the request for access to the multiple-choice questions asked in the admission tests - Secrecy of the selection board’s proceedings)
      (2020/C 390/40)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: ZL (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and K. Tóth, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the decision of 7 March 2018 of the selection board for competition EUIPO/AD/01/17 — Administrators (AD 6) in the field of intellectual property rejecting the applicant’s request for review of that selection board’s decision of 1 December 2017 not to place her name on the reserve list drawn up with a view to the recruitment of administrators by EUIPO and, secondly, of EUIPO’s decision of 27 June 2018 rejecting her complaints.
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      The Court:
      
                  1.
               
               
                  Dismisses the action;
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Orders ZL to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 445, 10.12.2018.