CELEX: 62010TA0444
Language: en
Date: 2013-02-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-444/10: Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2013 — Esge v OHIM — De’Longhi Benelux (KMIX) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark KMIX — Earlier Community word mark BAMIX — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

13.4.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 108/21
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 21 February 2013 — Esge v OHIM — De’Longhi Benelux (KMIX)
   (Case T-444/10) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark KMIX - Earlier Community word mark BAMIX - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2013/C 108/57
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Esge AG (Bussnang, Switzerland) (represented by: J. Klink, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: P. Geroulakos, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: De’Longhi Benelux SA, formerly Kenwood Appliances Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: P. Strickland, Solicitor, and L. St. Ville, Barrister)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 July 2010 (Case R 1249/2009-2), concerning opposition proceedings between Esge AG and Kenwood Appliances Luxembourg SA.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Esge AG to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 317, 20.11.2010.