CELEX: 52012DC0304
Language: en
Date: 2012-05-30 00:00:00
Title: Recommendation for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION on Denmark’s 2012 national reform programme and delivering a Council opinion on Denmark’s convergence programme for 2012-2015

|
			
		
		
		52012DC0304
		
			Recommendation for a COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION on Denmark’s 2012 national reform programme and delivering a Council opinion on Denmark’s convergence programme for 2012-2015 /* COM/2012/0304 final */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	Recommendation for a
COUNCIL RECOMMENDATION
on Denmark’s 2012 national reform
programme 
and delivering a Council opinion on Denmark’s convergence programme for
2012-2015
THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 121(2) and 148(4)
thereof,
Having regard to Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97 of 7 July 1997 on the strengthening of the surveillance of budgetary
positions and the surveillance and coordination of economic policies[1], and in particular Article 5(2)
thereof,
Having regard to Regulation (EU) No
1176/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 November on the
prevention and correction of macroeconomic imbalances[2], and in particular Article 6(1)
thereof,
Having regard to the recommendation of the
European Commission[3],
Having regard to the resolutions of the
European Parliament,[4] 
Having regard to the conclusions of the
European Council,
Having regard to the opinion of the
Employment Committee,
After consulting the Economic and Financial
Committee,
Whereas:
(1)       On 26 March 2010, the
European Council agreed to the European Commission’s proposal to launch a new
strategy for jobs and growth, Europe 2020, based on enhanced coordination of
economic policies, which will focus on the key areas where action is needed to
boost Europe’s potential for sustainable growth and competitiveness.
(2)       On 13 July 2010, the
Council adopted a recommendation on the broad guidelines for the economic
policies of the Member States and the Union (2010 to 2014) and, on 21 October
2010, adopted a decision on guidelines for the employment policies of the
Member States[5],
which together form the ‘integrated guidelines’. Member States were invited to
take the integrated guidelines into account in their national economic and
employment policies.
(3)       On 12 July 2011, the
Council adopted a recommendation on Denmark’s national reform programme for 2011
and delivered its opinion on Denmark’s updated convergence programme for
2011-2014.
(4)       On 23 November 2011, the
Commission adopted the second Annual Growth Survey, marking the start of the second
European Semester of ex-ante and integrated policy coordination, which is
anchored in the Europe 2020 strategy. On 14 February 2012, the Commission, on
the basis of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011, adopted the Alert Mechanism Report[6], in which it identified Denmark
as one of the Member States for which an in-depth review would be carried out.
(5)       On 2 March 2012, the
European Council endorsed the priorities for ensuring financial stability,
fiscal consolidation and action to foster growth. It underscored the need to pursue
differentiated, growth-friendly fiscal consolidation, to restore normal lending
conditions to the economy, to promote growth and competitiveness, to tackle
unemployment and the social consequences of the crisis, and to modernise public
administration.
(6)       On
2 March 2012, the European Council also invited the Member States participating
in the Euro Plus Pact to present their commitments in time for inclusion in
their stability or convergence programmes and their national reform programmes.
(7)       On 30 April 2012, Denmark
submitted its convergence programme for the period 2012-2015 and its 2012 national
reform programme. In order to take account of their interlinkages, the two
programmes have been assessed at the same time. The Commission concluded in its
in-depth review[7],
under Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011, that Denmark is experiencing
an internal and external imbalance, although not excessive.
(8)       Based on the assessment of
the 2012 convergence programme pursuant to Council Regulation (EC) No 1466/97,
the Council is of the opinion that the macroeconomic scenario underpinning the
budgetary projections in the programme is plausible. The scenario projecting
GDP growth at 1.2 and 1.5% in 2012 and 2013 is broadly in line with the
Commission's 2012 spring forecast of 1.1 and 1.4%. Accordingly, the government
deficits are slightly smaller in the convergence programme (4.0 and 1.8% of GDP
in 2012 and 2013 respectively, compared with 4.1 and 2.0% of GDP in the
Commission's 2012 spring forecast). The objective of the budgetary strategy
outlined in the programme is to correct the excessive deficit by 2013 and
achieving the medium term budgetary objective (MTO) of at least a structurally
balanced budget in 2020. The programme thereby confirms the previous MTO, which
adequately reflects the requirements of the Stability and Growth Pact. The
planned headline deficit in 2013 is consistent with a timely correction of the
excessive government deficit and, based on the (recalculated) structural budget
balance[8],
the planned fiscal effort in that year complies with the Council recommendation issued under the Excessive Deficit Procedure
in July 2010. The consolidation path has become more
back-loaded than previously planned and a sizeable effort is needed in 2013 to
ensure the required structural adjustment. Risks of falling short of the 3% of
GDP reference value in 2013 are limited; the Commission's 2012 spring forecast
sees the government deficit at 2.0% of GDP. Based on the (recalculated) structural
budget balance, from 2013 onwards, the estimated budgetary improvement in the
structural budget balance falls short of the 0.5% of GDP required by the Stability
and Growth Pact.. At the same time, the growth rate of government expenditure,
taking into account discretionary revenue measures, is expected to be in line
with the expenditure benchmark of the Stability and Growth Pact. Part of the
budget deficits will be financed by reducing the government's account with Denmark's
Nationalbank. Denmark's gross public debt is projected to fall from 46.5% of
GDP in 2011 to 41.1% in 2015, well below 60% of GDP.
(9)       Increasing labour supply
is a key priority for Denmark in order to ensure future welfare and fiscal
sustainability. In 2011, Denmark concluded an ambitious reform of the voluntary
early retirement pension scheme and brought forward the previously planned
increase in the statutory retirement age and its link to life expectancy. The focus
now needs to shift to reforming the disability pension and subsidised
employment (flex-job) schemes. The government has presented a proposal for
reform in this area, which should be implemented without delay. The widening gap
in employment outcomes between people with a migrant background and the rest of
the working population also needs to be addressed. 
(10)     Labour productivity growth
in Denmark has slowed down over the last decades, one of the causes being a
relatively weak education performance. Despite a high level of spending on education,
the quality of Danish school education — as measured by the OECD’s PISA survey —
is only average. Furthermore, students generally finish their studies at a
later age than in other Member States and the drop-out rates from vocational education
institutions are relatively high. To respond to the challenges in this field,
the government has announced a number of new measures for both compulsory and
secondary education. The 2012 budget also supports the introduction of social
clauses in public procurement calls and measures to make it financially
beneficial for private companies to offer apprenticeships, in order to increase
the number of available places. Increasing the provision of apprenticeships will
also be addressed in tripartite negotiations and in the work of an
inter-ministerial Committee. 
(11)     Another potential reason
for slow productivity growth is the relatively weak degree of competition in
Denmark. In 2011, a competition package was adopted, mainly targeting the
construction sector, the retail sector, and health and public sector services. Competition
for taxis and transportation services as well as the liberalisation of
pharmacies are under investigation, in view of possible new measures. The issue
of increasing public procurement in municipalities and regions is currently being
negotiated with regional and local governments. In this context, a government committee
recently concluded that the Danish competition law is in need of reinforcement,
and that sanctions for infringements are currently too low to serve as a
deterrent. Given that only limited concrete initiatives have been taken in this
area over the past year, further steps are needed to adequately address this
challenge. 
(12)     As confirmed in the
in-depth review under Article 5 of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011, while the high
household gross debt to some extent is a structural feature of the Danish
economy, with household assets considerably exceeding liabilities, concerns
regarding high household debt arise as developments in the housing market seem
to have caused the debt to move beyond levels explained by structural factors.
Furthermore, the composition of mortgage loans has changed since 2003, with
instalment-free and variable-rate loans gaining in popularity over fixed-rate
loans with instalment. For a given debt level, households are therefore more
sensitive to interest rates hikes and fluctuations in property prices now than
they were a decade ago. This poses higher potential risks in terms of financial
and economic stability. Relevant measures have been taken in Denmark to address
vulnerabilities in the mortgage system. Moreover, the Ministry of Business and
Growth is currently analysing the distribution of assets and liabilities across
households and their potential vulnerability in the event of different economic
shocks. However, measures should also be considered to prevent pro-cyclical developments
in the housing market in the medium term, preferably by realigning the property
value tax with actual market values. Removing the ceiling of the annual
increase of the municipal land value tax could also prevent future pro-cyclical
effects. Such measures should be introduced gradually, taking into account the
current need for stabilisation in the housing market. 
(13)     Denmark has made a number
of commitments under the Euro Plus Pact. These commitments, and the
implementation of the commitments presented in 2011, relate to fostering
employment, improving competitiveness, enhancing sustainability of public
finances and reinforcing financial stability. The Commission has assessed the
implementation of the Euro Plus Pact commitments. The results of this
assessment have been taken into account in the recommendations.
(14)     In the context of the
European Semester, the Commission has carried out a comprehensive analysis of Denmark’s
economic policy. It has assessed the convergence programme and national reform programme,
and presented an in-depth review. It has taken into account not only their
relevance for sustainable fiscal and socio-economic policy in Denmark but also
their compliance with EU rules and guidance, given the need to reinforce the
overall economic governance of the European Union by providing EU-level input
into future national decisions. Its recommendations under the European Semester
are reflected in recommendations (1) to (5) below. 
(15)     In the light of this
assessment, the Council has examined Denmark’s convergence programme, and its
opinion[9]
is reflected in particular in recommendation (1) below.
(16)     In the light of the results
of the Commission’s in-depth review and this assessment, the Council has
examined Denmark’s 2012 national reform programme and Denmark’s convergence
programme. Its recommendations under Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 1176/2011
are reflected in particular in recommendations (3), (4) and (5) below,
HEREBY RECOMMENDS that Denmark
should take action within the period 2012-2013 to:
1.           Implement the budgetary
strategy as envisaged, to ensure a correction of the excessive deficit by 2013 and
achieve the annual average structural adjustment effort specified in the
Council recommendations under the Excessive Deficit Procedure. Thereafter,
ensure an adequate structural adjustment effort to make sufficient progress
towards the medium-term budgetary objective (MTO), including meeting the
expenditure benchmark. 
2.           Take further steps to enhance
long-term labour supply by reforming the disability pension, better targeting
subsidised employment schemes (the ‘flex-job’ system) towards people with
reduced work capacity, and improving the employability of people with migrant
background.
3.           Implement announced
measures, without delay, to improve the cost-effectiveness of the education
system, reduce drop-out rates, in particular within vocational education, and
increase the number of apprenticeships.
4.           Continue efforts to remove
obstacles to competition, in particular in local services, the retail and
construction sector, including by further opening the municipal and regional
procurement of services to competition and ensuring that competition law
sanctions are sufficiently deterrent.
5.           Consider further
preventive measures to strengthen the stability of the housing market and
financial system in the medium-term, including by taking account of the results
of the ongoing study by the Ministry of Business and Growth on the distribution
of assets and liabilities across households and by reviewing the property value
and municipal land value tax system.
Done at Brussels,
                                                                       For
the Council
                                                                       The
President
[1]               OJ L 209, 02.08.1997, p. 1
[2]               OJ L 306, 23.11.2011, p. 25
[3]               COM(2012)304 final
[4]               P7_TA(2012)0048 and P7_TA(2012)0047
[5]               Council Decision 2012/238/EU of 26 April 2012
[6]               COM(2012) 68 final
[7]               SWD(2012)153 final
[8]               Cyclically adjusted balance net of one-off and
temporary measures, recalculated by the Commission services on the basis of the information provided in the programme, using
the commonly agreed methodology.
[9]               Under Article 9 (2) of Council Regulation (EC) No
1466/97.