CELEX: 52012PC0526
Language: en
Date: 2012-09-20
Title: Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Decision No 573/2007/EC, Decision No 575/2007/EC and Council Decision 2007/435/EC with a view to increasing the co-financing rate of the European Refugee Fund, the European Return Fund and the European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals as regards certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability

|
			
		
		
		52012PC0526
		
			Proposal for a DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL amending Decision No 573/2007/EC, Decision No 575/2007/EC and Council Decision 2007/435/EC with a view to increasing the co-financing rate of the European Refugee Fund, the European Return Fund and the European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals as regards certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Member States experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their financial stability /* COM/2012/0526 final - 2012/0252 (COD) */
			
				
		
		
			
			   	EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM
1.           CONTEXT OF THE PROPOSAL
·                        
Reasons and objectives 
The sustained
financial and economic crisis is stepping up the pressure on national financial
resources as Member States reduce their budgets. In this context, ensuring the smooth
implementation of programmes adopted under the four Funds established as part
of the General Programme on ‘Solidarity and Management
of Migration Flows’ (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Funds’), is of particular importance as a means of injecting funds into the
economy.
Nonetheless,
the implementation of the programmes is often challenging as a result of
liquidity problems caused by budget constraints that often lead to severe
cutbacks in expenditures consequently augmenting problems during a period of
sustained crisis. This is the case in particular for those Member States which
have been most affected by the crisis and have received financial assistance
under a programme from the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM),
the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) or bilateral loans for the euro
countries or from the Balance of Payments (BoP) mechanism for non-euro
countries. To date, six countries — including Greece which also received
financial assistance before the establishment of the EFSM via bilateral loans —
have requested financial assistance under the various support mechanisms and
have agreed with the Commission on a macro-economic adjustment programme. These
six countries are Hungary, Romania, Latvia (under the BoP), Portugal, Greece
and Ireland (under the EFSM/EFSF/bilaterally). It should be noted that the
programme for Hungary expired in 2010 while the programme for Latvia expired in
early 2012.
To ensure that Member
States benefiting from a financial support mechanism (or any other Member States
which may be concerned by such assistance in the future) continue to implement
the programmes adopted under the Funds on the ground and disburse funds to
projects, this proposal contains provisions that would allow the Commission to increase
the Union co-financing rate for these countries, for the period during which they
benefit from financial assistance provided by one of the support mechanisms
under any funding instruments. This will provide additional financial resources
to the Member States and will make it easier to continue implementing the
programmes on the ground.
·                        
General context
There can be no
doubt that the deepening financial crisis in some Member States is having a substantial
effect on the real economy, given among other things the amount of accumulated debt
and the difficulties encountered by the governments wishing to borrow money
from the market at sustainable costs.
The Commission
has been very active in putting forward proposals for the best way to react to
the current financial crisis and its socio-economic consequences. Its three
proposals for these issues have been adopted. The first revises Regulation (EC)
No 1083/2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional
Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund with a view to
increasing the amount of the Union contribution which is disbursed through
interim payments and payments of the final balance by up to 10 percentage
points above the current limits (Regulation (EU) No 1311/2011 of 13 December
2011). The second proposal revises Council Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005 on
support for rural development by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural
Development with a view to increasing the Fund’s contribution rate up to 95 %
in the regions eligible under Convergence objectives, the outermost regions and
the smaller Aegean Islands and up to 85 % in other regions (Regulation (EU)
No 1312/2011 of 19 December 2011). The third one revises Regulation (EC) No
1198/2006 on the European Fisheries Fund allowing for
an increased amount of Union contribution to be disbursed
through interim payments and payments of the final balance by up to 10
percentage points above the current limits (Regulation (EU) No 387/2012 of 19
April 2012).
·                        
Provisions in force in the policy sphere of
the proposal
Article 14 of Decision No 573/2007/EC of
the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013
as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’
provides that the Union co-financing rate for supported actions does not in
principle exceed 50 %. Article 14 also provides that this Union
co-financing rate may be increased to 75 % if the Member State in question
is covered by the Cohesion Fund or if the action addresses specific priorities identified in the strategic guidelines.
Article 15 of Decision No 575/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the European Return Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as
part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’
and Article 13 of Council Decision 2007/435/EC of 25 June 2007 establishing the
European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals for the period
2007 to 2013 as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of
Migration Flows’ have identical content to the abovementioned Article 14 of
Decision No 573/2007/EC.
Article 21(3) of Decision No 573/2007/EC
provides that financial assistance from the European Refugee Fund for emergency
measures shall not exceed 80 % of the cost of each measure.
·                        
Consistency with other policies and
objectives of the Union
The proposal is consistent with other proposals and initiatives
adopted by the European Commission as a response to the financial crisis.
2.           RESULTS OF CONSULTATIONS OF
INTERESTED PARTIES AND IMPACT ASSESSMENTS
·                        
Consultation of interested parties
There was no consultation of external stakeholders.
·                        
Procurement and use of expertise
Use of external expertise has not been necessary.
·                        
Impact analysis
The proposal will allow the Commission to
apply higher co-financing rates for the countries benefiting from one of the support
mechanisms.
There is no need for additional budget as
the annual national allocation from the Funds for the countries and the
programmes over the 2007-2013 programming period will not change.
3.           LEGAL ELEMENTS OF THE
PROPOSAL
·                        
Summary of the proposal
It is proposed to modify Article 14 and Article 21(3) of Decision
No 573/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council to allow the Union
co-financing rate applicable to the European Refugee Fund programmes of the
Member States concerned to be increased by 20 percentage points, provided they
are benefiting from one of the support mechanisms. Similarly it is proposed to
modify Article 15 of Decision No 575/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council, as well as Article 13 of Council Decision 2007/435/EC.
Once a decision granting financial
assistance to a Member State under one of the support mechanisms has been taken,
the Member State may submit to the Commission either a draft annual programme or a draft revised annual programme applying the increased Union co-financing rate.
To be entitled to apply the increased Union
co-financing rate, a Member State must benefit from one of the support
mechanisms at the time of submitting its draft annual programme or draft revised annual programme. However, once an
action of a specific annual programme has been co-financed at the increased Union
co-financing rate, it remains so until the end of the eligibility period of the
related annual programme whether or not the Member State still benefits from one
of the support mechanisms.
·                        
Legal basis
Decision No 573/2007/EC
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the European Refugee Fund for the period 2008 to 2013
as part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration
Flows’.
Decision No 575/2007/EC
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007 establishing the European Return Fund for the period 2008 to 2013 as
part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’.
Council
Decision 2007/435/EC of 25 June 2007 establishing the European Fund for the
Integration of third-country nationals for the period 2007 to 2013 as part of
the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’.
Based on the
principle of shared management between the Commission and the Member States,
these Decisions include provisions for the programming process as well as
arrangements for programme management (including financial management),
monitoring, financial control and evaluation of projects.
·                        
Subsidiarity principle
The proposal
complies within the subsidiarity principle to the extent that it seeks to
provide increased support through the Funds for certain Member States undergoing
serious difficulties, particularly those facing problems in their economic
growth and financial stability and experiencing a deterioration in their
deficit and debt positions or slowed economic growth, reflecting structural
domestic challenges and the international economic and financial environment.
In this context, it is necessary to establish at European Union level a
temporary mechanism which allows the European Union to co‑finance
certified expenditure under the Funds, using a higher co-financing rate.
·                        
Proportionality principle
The proposal conforms to the proportionality principle:
This proposal
is indeed proportionate, since it goes a long way in providing increased
support from the Funds to the Member States that are in difficulties or seriously
threatened with severe difficulties caused by exceptional occurrences beyond their
control and falling under the conditions of Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010
(establishing the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism (EFSM)), or
receiving for the same reasons financial assistance from the European Financial
Stability Facility (EFSF) or the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), or in
difficulties or seriously threatened with difficulties as regards their balance
of payments and falling under the conditions of Council Regulation (EC) No
332/2002. This would also apply to Greece, which received financial assistance under
a particular agreement established outside the support mechanisms, under a
Intercreditor Agreement and the Euro Area Loan Facility Act.
·                        
Choice of instrument
Proposed instrument: Decisions.
Other instruments would not be appropriate for the following
reasons:
The Commission
has explored the scope for manoeuvre provided by the legal framework and
considers it necessary, in the light of experience gained so far, to propose amendments
to the Decisions. The objective of this revision is to make the co-financing of
actions easier, thereby accelerating both their implementation and the impact
of such investments on the real economy.
4.           BUDGETARY IMPLICATION
There is no
impact on commitment appropriations since no modifications are proposed to the
maximum amounts of the Funds' financing provided for in the annual programmes
for the programming period 2007-2013.
The proposal
shows the European Commission's willingness to assist the Member States in their
efforts to deal with the financial crisis. The amendments will provide the
Member States concerned with the necessary funds to support projects and economic
recovery.
2012/0252 (COD)
Proposal for a
DECISION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL
amending Decision No 573/2007/EC, Decision
No 575/2007/EC and Council Decision 2007/435/EC with a view to increasing the
co-financing rate of the European Refugee Fund, the European Return Fund and
the European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals as regards
certain provisions relating to financial management for certain Member States
experiencing or threatened with serious difficulties with respect to their
financial stability
THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE
COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,
Having regard to the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Articles 78(2) and Article
79(2) and (4) thereof,
Having regard to the proposal from the
European Commission,
After transmission of the draft legislative
act to the national Parliaments,
Acting in accordance with the ordinary
legislative procedure,
Whereas:
(1)       Decision No 573/2007/EC of
the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 May 2007[1] established the European
Refugee Fund, Decision No 575/2007/EC of the European Parliament and of
the Council of 23 May 2007[2]
established the European Return Fund and Council Decision 2007/435/EC of 25
June 2007[3]
established the European Fund for the Integration of third-country nationals, as
part of the General programme ‘Solidarity and Management of Migration Flows’.
They provide for different Union co-financing rates for actions supported by
the Funds. 
(2)       The unprecedented global
financial crisis and economic downturn have seriously damaged economic growth
and financial stability, provoking a marked deterioration in financial,
economic and social conditions in several Member States. Some Member States are
experiencing serious difficulties or are threatened with such difficulties,
particularly with respect to their financial and economic stability, leading to
deterioration in their deficit and debt positions and threatening economic
growth heightened by the international economic and financial environment.
(3)       While important actions to
counterbalance the negative effects of the crisis have already been taken, the
impact of the financial crisis on the real economy, the labour market and
society at large is being widely felt. Pressure on national financial resources
is increasing and further steps should be taken rapidly to alleviate that
pressure through the maximal and optimal use of Union funding.
(4)       Council Regulation (EC) No
332/2002 of 18 February 2002 establishing a facility providing medium-term
financial assistance for Member States’ balances of payments[4] provides that the Council is to
grant medium-term financial assistance where a Member State which has not
adopted the euro is in difficulties or is seriously threatened with
difficulties as regards its balance of payments. 
(5)       Romania was granted such
financial assistance by Council Decision 2009/459/EC[5].
(6)       On 9 May 2010 the Council
adopted a comprehensive package of measures, including (a) a Council Regulation
establishing the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism[6] based on Article 122(2) of the
Treaty, and (b) the European Financial Stability Facility to provide financial
support to euro-area Member States in difficulties caused by exceptional
circumstances beyond such euro-area Member States’ control, the aim being to
safeguard the financial stability of the euro area as a whole as well as its
Member States.
(7)       Ireland and Portugal were
granted financial assistance by the European Financial Stabilisation Mechanism
under Council Implementing Decisions 2011/77/EU[7]
and No 2011/344/EU[8]
respectively. They have also received funds from the European Financial
Stability Facility. 
(8)       The Intercreditor
Agreement and the Loan Facility Agreement for Greece, concluded on 8 May 2010,
entered into force on 11 May 2010. On 12 March 2012, the finance ministers of
the 17 euro-area Member States interrupted this first programme and approved a
second programme of financial assistance for Greece. It was decided that the
financial vehicle for this second programme would be the European Financial
Stability Facility, which would also disburse the remaining amount to be
contributed by the euro area under the first programme.
(9)       On 2 February 2012, the
finance ministers of the 17 euro-area Member States signed the Treaty
establishing the European Stability Mechanism. Under that Treaty, which follows
European Council Decision 2011/199/EU of 25 March 2011 amending Article 136 of
the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union with regard to a stability
mechanism for Member States whose currency is the euro[9], the European Stability
Mechanism will become the primary provider of financial assistance to euro-area
Member States as of its entry into force in mid-2012. Thus, this Decision
should already take the European Stability Mechanism into account.
(10)     In its conclusions of 23
and 24 June 2011 the European Council welcomed the Commission’s intention to
enhance the synergies between the loan programme for Greece and Union funds and
supported efforts to increase Greece’s capacity to absorb Union funds in order
to stimulate growth and employment by refocusing on improving competitiveness
and job creation. Moreover, it welcomed and supported the preparation by the
Commission, together with the Member States, of a comprehensive programme of
technical assistance to Greece. These amendments to Decision No 573/2007/EC, Decision
No 575/2007/EC and to Council Decision 2007/435/EC contribute to such efforts to enhance synergies.
(11)     In
view of the exceptional circumstances, Regulation (EU) No 1083/2006/EU laying
down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European
Social Fund and the Cohesion
Fund
was amended by Regulation (EU) No 1311/2011 to allow for
an increase in the co-financing rate applied under the Structural Funds and the
Cohesion Fund for Member States which are facing serious difficulties with
respect to their financial stability[10].
A similar approach was adopted towards those same Member States in the
framework of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (Regulation (EU)
No 1312/2011 amending Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005)[11] and in the framework of the
European Fisheries Fund (Regulation (EU) No 387/2012 amending Council Regulation
(EC) No 1198/2006)[12].
Likewise, those Member States should also be supported in the framework of the four
Funds established as part of the General Programme on ‘Solidarity
and Management of Migration Flows’, namely the External Borders Fund, the European
Return Fund, the European Refugee Fund and the European Fund for the
Integration of third‑country nationals (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Funds’) established for the period 2007-2013.
(12)     The
Funds are key tools for helping Member States tackle important challenges in
the area of migration, asylum and external borders such as the development of a
comprehensive Union immigration policy to enhance the competitiveness and
social cohesion of the Union and the creation of a Common European Asylum System.
(13)     To make European Union
funding easier to manage in the area of migration, asylum and external borders and
to improve the availability of funding for the Member States to implement their
annual programmes under the Funds, it is necessary, on a temporary basis and
without prejudice to the 2014-2020 programming period, to arrange for an
increase in the Union co-financing rate under the Funds, by an amount
corresponding to twenty percentage points above the co-financing rates currently
applicable, for Member States experiencing serious difficulties with respect to
their financial stability. This means that the Funds’ annual national allocation
pursuant to the basic acts will remain unchanged while national co-financing will
be reduced accordingly. Ongoing annual
programmes will need to be revised to reflect the changes resulting from the
application of the increased Union co-financing rate.
(14)     Any Member State seeking to
benefit from the increased co-financing rate should provide the Commission with
a written statement together with its draft annual programme or draft revised
annual programme. In its statement, the Member State concerned should provide a
reference to the relevant Council Decision or to any relevant decision making
it eligible to benefit from the increased Union co-financing rate.
(15)     The unprecedented crisis
affecting international financial markets and the economic downturn have
seriously damaged the financial stability of several Member States. As a rapid
response is necessary to counter the effects on the economy as a whole, this
Decision should enter into force as soon as possible.
(16)     Decision No 573/2007/EC, Decision No 575/2007/EC and
Council Decision 2007/435/EC should therefore be amended accordingly. When reference is made to Article 14 or Article 21(3) of Decision
No 573/2007/EC, to Article 15 of Decision No 575/2007/EC, to Article 13 of Council Decision 2007/435/EC or to the percentage of Union contribution provided therein, this
should be construed as a reference to the revised Article 14, Article 21(3), Article
15, Article 13 and to the — possibly increased — percentage of the Union
contribution.
(17)     In accordance with Article
3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect
of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the Treaty on European
Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and without
prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, Ireland [is not taking part in the
adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its application
/ has notified its wish to take part in the adoption and application of this
Decision].
(18)     In accordance with Article
3 of the Protocol on the position of the United Kingdom and Ireland in respect
of the area of freedom, security and justice, annexed to the Treaty on European
Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and without
prejudice to Article 4 of that Protocol, the United Kingdom [is not taking
part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by it or subject to its
application / has notified its wish to take part in the adoption and
application of this Decision].
(19)     In accordance with Articles
1 and 2 of the Protocol on the position of Denmark annexed to the Treaty on
European Union and to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,
Denmark is not taking part in the adoption of this Decision and is not bound by
it or subject to its application.
HAVE ADOPTED THIS DECISION:
Article 1
Decision No 573/2007/EC is amended as follows:
(1) In Article 14, paragraph 4 is replaced
by the following: 
‘4.        The Union contribution to
supported projects, as regards actions implemented in the Member States under
Article 3, shall not exceed 50 % of the total cost of a specific action.
This may be increased to 75 % for
projects addressing specific priorities identified in the strategic guidelines
referred to in Article 17.
The Union contribution shall be increased
to 75 % in the Member States covered by the Cohesion Fund.
The Union contribution
may be increased by 20 percentage points provided that the Member State meets
one of the following conditions at the time of submission of its draft annual
programme in accordance with Article 20(3) of this Decision or draft revised
annual programme in accordance with Article 23 of Commission Decision 2008/22/EC*:
(a)     medium-term financial assistance is made
available to it in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002**;
(b)     financial assistance is made available to
it in accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010*** or financial
assistance is made available to it by other euro area Member States before the
entry into force of that Regulation;
(c)     financial assistance is made available to
it in accordance with the intergovernmental agreement reached establishing the
European Financial Stability Facility or the Treaty establishing the European
Stability Mechanism.
The Member State concerned shall
submit a written statement to the Commission together with its draft annual
programme or draft revised annual programme confirming that it meets one of the
conditions referred to in points (a), (b) or (c) of the fourth subparagraph.
A project co-financed at the increased
rate may remain so whether or not one of the conditions referred to in points
(a), (b) or (c) of the fourth subparagraph is still met in the course of the implementation
of the related annual programme.
_______
*          OJ L
167, 27.06.2008, p. 1.
**        OJ L 53,
12.5.2010, p. 1.
***      OJ L 118, 12.5.2010, p. 1.’
(2) In Article 21, paragraph 3 is replaced
by the following:
‘3.        Financial assistance from the
Fund for the emergency measures provided for in Article 5 shall be limited to a
period of six months and shall not exceed 80 % of the cost of each
measure.
Financial assistance may be increased by 20
percentage points provided that the Member State meets one of the conditions
referred to in points (a), (b) or (c) of the fourth subparagraph of Article 14(4)
of this Decision at the time of submission of the
application for emergency measures referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article or
at the time of submission of its draft revised annual programme in accordance
with Article 23 of Decision 2008/22/EC.
The Member State concerned shall
submit a written statement to the Commission together with the application for
the emergency measures or its draft revised annual programme confirming that it
meets one of the conditions referred to in points (a), (b) or (c) of the fourth
subparagraph of Article 14(4).
A project co-financed at the increased
rate may remain so whether or not one of the conditions referred to in points
(a), (b) or (c) of the fourth subparagraph of Article 14(4) is still met in the
course of the implementation of the related emergency measures.’
Article 2
In Article 15
of Decision No 575/2007/EC, paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
‘4.        The Union
contribution to supported projects, as regards actions implemented in the
Member States under Article 3 shall not exceed 50 % of the total cost of a
specific action.
This may be
increased to 75 % for projects addressing specific priorities identified
in the strategic guidelines referred to in Article 18.
The Union
contribution shall be increased to 75 % in the Member States covered by
the Cohesion Fund.
The Union contribution
may be increased by 20 percentage points provided that the Member State meets
one of the following conditions at the time of submission of its draft annual
programme in accordance with Article 21(3) of this Decision or draft revised
annual programme in accordance with Article 23 of Commission Decision 2008/458/EC*:
(a)     medium-term financial assistance is made
available to it in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002**;
(b)     financial assistance is made available to
it in accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010*** or financial
assistance is made available to it by other euro area Member States before the
entry into force of that Regulation;
(c)     financial assistance is made available to
it in accordance with the intergovernmental agreement reached establishing the
European Financial Stability Facility or the Treaty establishing the European
Stability Mechanism.
The Member State concerned shall
submit a written statement to the Commission together with its draft annual
programme or draft revised annual programme confirming that it meets one of the
conditions referred to in points (a), (b) or (c) of the fourth subparagraph.
A project co-financed at the increased
rate may remain so whether or not one of the conditions referred to in points
(a), (b) or (c) of the fourth subparagraph is still met in the course of the implementation
of the related annual programme.
_______
*          OJ L
167, 27.06.2008, p. 135.
**        OJ L 53,
12.5.2010, p. 1.
***      OJ L 118,
12.5.2010, p. 1.’
Article 3
In Article 13 of Decision 2007/435/EC,
paragraph 4 is replaced by the following:
‘4.        The Union contribution to
supported projects, as regards actions implemented in the Member States under
Article 4, shall not exceed 50 % of the total cost of a specific action.
This may be increased to 75 % for
projects addressing specific priorities identified in the strategic guidelines
as defined in Article 16.
The Union contribution shall be increased
to 75 % in the Member States covered by the Cohesion Fund.
The Union contribution
may be increased by 20 percentage points provided that the Member State meets
one of the following conditions at the time of submission of its draft annual
programme in accordance with Article 19(3) of this Decision or draft revised
annual programme in accordance with Article 23 of Commission Decision 2008/457/EC*:
(a)     medium-term financial assistance is made
available to it in accordance with Council Regulation (EC) No 332/2002**;
(b)     financial assistance is made available to
it in accordance with Council Regulation (EU) No 407/2010*** or financial
assistance is made available to it by other euro area Member States before the
entry into force of that Regulation;
(c)     financial assistance is made available to
it in accordance with the intergovernmental agreement reached establishing the
European Financial Stability Facility or the Treaty establishing the European
Stability Mechanism.
The Member State concerned shall
submit a written statement to the Commission together with its draft annual
programme or draft revised annual programme confirming that it meets one of the
conditions referred to in points (a), (b) or (c) of the fourth subparagraph.
A project co-financed at the increased
rate may remain so whether or not one of the conditions referred to in points
(a), (b) or (c) of the fourth subparagraph is still met in the course of the implementation
of the related annual programme.
_______
*          OJ L
167, 27.06.2008, p. 69.
**        OJ L 53,
12.5.2010, p. 1.
***      OJ L
118, 12.5.2010, p. 1.’
Article 4
This Decision shall enter into force on the
day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the
European Union.
Article 5
This
Decision is addressed to the Member States in accordance with the Treaties.
Done at Brussels, 
For the European Parliament                       For
the Council
The President                                                 The
President
[1]               OJ L 144, 6.6.2007, p. 1.
[2]               OJ L 144, 6.6.2007, p. 45.
[3]               OJ L 168, 28.6.2007, p. 18.
[4]               OJ L 53, 23.2.2002, p. 1.
[5]               OJ L 150, 13.6.2009, p. 8. Decision as last amended
by Council Decision 2010/183/EU (OJ L 83, 30.3.2010, p. 19).
[6]               OJ L 118, 12.5.2010, p. 1.
[7]               OJ L 30, 4.2.2011, p. 34.
[8]               OJ L 159, 17.6.2011, p. 88.
[9]               OJ L 91, 6.4.2011, p. 1.
[10]             OJ L 337, 20.12.2011, p. 5.
[11]             OJ L 339, 21.12.2011, p. 1.
[12]             OJ L 129, 16.5.2012, p. 7.