CELEX: C2005/217/86
Language: en
Date: 2005-09-03 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 5 July 2005 in Case T-9/04 Luigi Marcuccio v Commission of the European Communities (Officials — Social security benefits — Accident — Article 73 of the Staff Regulations — Admissibility — Statement of reasons)

3.9.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 217/39
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 5 July 2005
   in Case T-9/04 Luigi Marcuccio v Commission of the European Communities (1)
   
   (Officials - Social security benefits - Accident - Article 73 of the Staff Regulations - Admissibility - Statement of reasons)
   (2005/C 217/86)
   Language of the case: Italian
   In Case T-9/04: Luigi Marcuccio, official of the Commission of the European Communities, residing in Tricase (Italy), represented by M. Di Stefano and A. Distante, lawyers, against Commission of the European Communities (Agents: J. Currall and C. Berardis-Kayser, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer, with an address for service in Luxembourg) — application primarily for annulment of the Commission's implied decision rejecting the application submitted by the applicant on 3 December 2002 with a view to securing acknowledgment of an accident under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities — the Court of First Instance (First Chamber), composed of J.D. Cooke, President, I. Labucka and V. Trstenjak, Judges; J. Palacio González, Principal Adminstrator, for the Registrar, gave a judgment on 5 July 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Annuls the Commission's decision rejecting the application submitted by the applicant on 3 December 2002 with a view to securing acknowledgment of an accident under Article 73 of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Communities.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Dismisses the claims for the Court to order measures of inquiry.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Declares the remainder of the application inadmissible.
            
         
               4.
            
            
               Orders the Commission to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 85, 3.4.2004