CELEX: 62011TB0400
Language: en
Date: 2013-09-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-400/11: Order of the General Court of 9 September 2013 — Altadis v Commission (Action for annulment — State aid — Aid scheme allowing for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions — Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of the aid — Act entailing implementing measures — Lack of individual concern — No obligation to recover — Inadmissibility)

16.11.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 336/21
            
         Order of the General Court of 9 September 2013 — Altadis v Commission
   (Case T-400/11) (1)
   
   (Action for annulment - State aid - Aid scheme allowing for the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions - Decision declaring the aid scheme to be incompatible with the common market and not ordering the recovery of the aid - Act entailing implementing measures - Lack of individual concern - No obligation to recover - Inadmissibility)
   2013/C 336/43
   Language of the case: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Altadis, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, E. Abad Valdenebro, M. Muñoz de Juan and R. Calvo Salinero, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, C. Urraca Caviedes and P. Němečkova, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application for partial annulment of Commission Decision 2011/282/EU of 12 January 2011 on the tax amortisation of financial goodwill for foreign shareholding acquisitions No C 45/07 (ex NN 51/07, ex CP 9/07) implemented by Spain (OJ 2011 L 135, p. 1).
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The action is dismissed;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Altadis, SA is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 282, 24.9.2011.