CELEX: 62014TA0493
Language: en
Date: 2017-02-17 00:00:00
Title: Case T-493/14: Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2017 — Mayer v EFSA (Seconded national expert — EFSA rules on SNEs — Decision not to extend the secondment — Access to documents — Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 — Refusal to grant access — Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual — Protection of personal data — Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 — Applications for a declaration and seeking the issue of directions — Written pleadings supplementing the originating application — Amendments to the heads of claim — Admissibility)

3.4.2017   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 104/41
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 17 February 2017 — Mayer v EFSA
   (Case T-493/14) (1)
   
   ((Seconded national expert - EFSA rules on SNEs - Decision not to extend the secondment - Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the integrity of the individual - Protection of personal data - Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 - Applications for a declaration and seeking the issue of directions - Written pleadings supplementing the originating application - Amendments to the heads of claim - Admissibility))
   (2017/C 104/57)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Ingrid Alice Mayer (Ellwangen, Germany) (represented by: T. Mayer, lawyer)
   
      Defendant): European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) (represented by: D. Detken, acting as Agent, R. Van der Hout and A. Köhler, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought under Article 263 TFEU challenging the decisions of EFSA, first, dismissing the applicant’s request to extend her secondment as a national expert at EFSA and, second, refusing her request for access to documents held by EFSA
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action as inadmissible;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Ingrid Alice Mayer to pay the costs, including those relating to the proceedings for interim measures;
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 329, 22.9.2014.