CELEX: 62015TN0216
Language: en
Date: 2015-04-24 00:00:00
Title: Case T-216/15: Action brought on 24 April 2015 — Dôvera zdravotná poist'ovňa/Commission

10.8.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 262/31
            
         Action brought on 24 April 2015 — Dôvera zdravotná poist'ovňa/Commission
   (Case T-216/15)
   (2015/C 262/41)
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Dôvera zdravotná poist'ovňa, s.a. (Bratislava, Slovakia) (represented by: O. Brouwer and A. Pliego Selie, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Commission
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the Commission Decision (EU) 2015/248 of 15 October 2014 on the measures SA.23008 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) implemented by the Slovak Republic for Spoločná zdravotná poisťovňa, a. s. (SZP) and Všeobecná zdravotná poisťovňa, a. s. (VZP) (notified under document C(2014) 7277) (OJ 2015 L 41, p. 25);
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Commission to pay the costs of the procedure.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
   
               1.
            
            
               First plea in law, alleging a misapplication of Article 107 (1) TFEU
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           The Commission has erred in law by misapplying the concept of undertaking in the specific context of Article 107 (1) TFEU.
                        
                     
         
               2.
            
            
               Second plea in law, alleging errors of law and manifest errors of assessment
               
                           —
                        
                        
                           The Commission has, in setting and applying the criteria to determine the economic nature of the insurance scheme, committed errors of law and manifest errors of assessment in finding that SZP/VZP does not qualify as an undertaking and failed to provide adequate reasoning.