CELEX: 62010TA0323
Language: en
Date: 2011-11-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-323/10: Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Chabou v OHIM — Chalou (CHABOU) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark CHABOU — Earlier national and international word marks Chalou — Refusal to register — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) and Article 12(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

7.1.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 6/14
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2011 — Chabou v OHIM — Chalou (CHABOU)
   (Case T-323/10) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the Community word mark CHABOU - Earlier national and international word marks Chalou - Refusal to register - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 12(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2012/C 6/23
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Chickmouza Chabou (Rheine, Germany) (represented by: K.-J. Triebold, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: S. Schäffner, acting as Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Chalou GmbH (Herschweiler-Pettersheim, Germany) (represented by: T. Träger, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 May 2010 (Case R 1165/2009-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Chalou GmbH and Chickmouza Chabou
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               orders Mr Chickmouza Chabou to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 288, 23.10.2010.