CELEX: 62009TB0452
Language: en
Date: 2011-06-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-452/09 P: Order of the General Court of 21 June 2011 — Rosenbaum v Commission (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Classification in grade at the time of recruitment — Taking account of the professional experience of the person concerned — Article 31 of the Staff Regulations — Obligation to state reasons)

13.8.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 238/16
            
         Order of the General Court of 21 June 2011 — Rosenbaum v Commission
   (Case T-452/09 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Classification in grade at the time of recruitment - Taking account of the professional experience of the person concerned - Article 31 of the Staff Regulations - Obligation to state reasons)
   2011/C 238/27
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Eckehard Rosenbaum (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H.-J. Rüber, lawyer)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Currall and E. Eggers, Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: K. Zieléskiewicz and M. Bauer, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) in Case F-9/08 Rosenbaum v Commission, judgment of 10 September 2009, not published in the ECR, asking for that judgment to be set aside.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the appeal.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Mr Eckehard Rosenbaum to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present proceedings.
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 11, 16.1.2010.