CELEX: C2003/184/112
Language: en
Date: 2003-08-02 00:00:00
Title: Case T-207/03: Action brought on 11 June 2003 by Athanassios Rammos against the Commission of the European Communities

2.8.2003               EN                          Official Journal of the European Union                                         C 184/53
—     annul the decision of the competent hierarchical authority                 sion of the European Communities), the procedure for
      to reimburse, with effect from a year not further specified                calculating the annual expense of travelling to Greece in
      (1993, 1996, 1997, or another year, and for the period                     respect of the journey via Brindisi, as taken into consid-
      during which the applicants were officials of the Commis-                  eration for the destination of Athens;
      sion of the European Communities), the cost of the sea
      passage from Brindisi to various Greek frontier points                     or, in the alternative,
      (Corfu, Igoumenitsa, Patras) on the basis of an ‘aircraft
      type seat’ ticket;                                                   —     annul the decision of the competent hierarchical authority
                                                                                 to reimburse, with effect from a year not further specified
—     annul all the applicants' pay slips implementing the                       (1993, 1996, 1997, or another year, and for the period
      decisions annulment of which is sought;                                    during which the applicants were officials of the Commis-
                                                                                 sion of the European Communities), the cost of the sea
—     reimburse to the applicants all the amounts not paid                       passage from Brindisi to various Greek frontier points
      following implementation of the decisions annulment of                     (Corfu, Igoumenitsa, Patras) on the basis of an ‘aircraft
      which is sought, together with legal interest;                             type seat’ ticket;
—     make the appropriate ruling as to costs and order the                —     annul all the applicants' pay slips implementing the
      Commission of the European Communities to pay those                        decisions annulment of which is sought;
      costs.
                                                                           —     reimburse to the applicants all the amounts not paid
                                                                                 following implementation of the decisions annulment of
                                                                                 which is sought, together with legal interest;
Pleas in law and main arguments
                                                                           —     make the appropriate ruling as to costs and order the
                                                                                 Commission of the European Communities to pay those
The applicants in this case seek the annulment of the Commis-
                                                                                 costs.
sion's decision changing the method of calculating annual
travel expenses to Greece.
The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the
applicants in support of their application are similar to those            Pleas in law and main arguments
of the applicants in Cases T-221/02 (1) and T-44/03 (2).
                                                                           The applicants in this case seek the annulment of the Commis-
 1
( ) OJ C 247, 12.10.2002, p. 17.                                           sion's decision changing the method of calculating annual
(2) OJ C 101, 26.4.2003, p. 40.                                            travel expenses to Greece.
                                                                           The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the
                                                                           applicants in support of their application are similar to those
                                                                           of the applicants in Cases T-221/02 (1) and T-44/03 (2).
                                                                           (1) OJ C 247, 12.10.02, p. 17.
Action brought on 11 June 2003 by Panayotis Adamo-                         (2) OJ C 101, 26.04.03, p. 40.
poulos and Others against the Commission of the
                      European Communities
                          (Case T-206/03)
                         (2003/C 184/111)
                                                                           Action brought on 11 June 2003 by Athanassios Rammos
                    (Language of the case: French)                            against the Commission of the European Communities
                                                                                                     (Case T-207/03)
An action against the Commission of the European Commu-
nities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the                                        (2003/C 184/112)
European Communities on 11 June 2003 by Panayotis Adamo-
poulos, residing in Brussels, and 118 other officials, represented
by G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, with an address for                                    (Language of the case: French)
service in Luxembourg.
The applicants claim that the Court should:                                An action against the Commission of the European Commu-
                                                                           nities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the
—     annul the decision of the competent hierarchical authority           European Communities on 11 June 2003 by Athanassios
      changing, with effect from a year not further specified              Rammos, residing in Uccle (Belgium), represented by
      (1993, 1996, 1997, or another year, and for the period               G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, with an address for service
      during which the applicants were officials of the Commis-            in Luxembourg.
 ---pagebreak--- C 184/54               EN                          Official Journal of the European Union                                          2.8.2003
The applicant claims that the Court should:                                European Communities on 11 June 2003 by Stavroula Gogos-
                                                                           Skarpatzi, residing in Waterloo (Belgium), and 11 other offi-
—     annul the decision of the competent hierarchical authority           cials, represented by G. Bounéou and F. Frabetti, lawyers, with
      changing, with effect from a year not further specified              an address for service in Luxembourg.
      (1993, 1996, 1997, or another year, and for the period
      during which the applicant was an official of the
      Commission of the European Communities), the proce-                  The applicants claim that the Court should:
      dure for calculating the annual expense of travelling to
      Greece in respect of the journey via Brindisi, as taken into
      consideration for the destination of Athens;                         —     annul the decision of the competent hierarchical authority
                                                                                 changing, with effect from a year not further specified
      or, in the alternative,                                                    (1993, 1996, 1997, or another year, and for the period
—     annul the decision of the competent hierarchical authority                 during which the applicants were officials of the Commis-
      to reimburse, with effect from a year not further specified                sion of the European Communities), the procedure for
      (1993, 1996, 1997, or another year, and for the period                     calculating the annual expense of travelling to Greece in
      during which the applicant was an official of the                          respect of the journey via Brindisi, as taken into consid-
      Commission of the European Communities), the cost of                       eration for the Greek islands, when travel must be
      the sea passage from Brindisi to various Greek frontier                    through Athens or Piraeus;
      posts (Corfu, Igoumenitsa, Patras) on the basis of an
      ‘aircraft type seat’ ticket;
                                                                                 or, in the alternative,
—     annul all the applicant's pay slips implementing the
      decisions annulment of which is sought;
                                                                           —     annul the decision of the competent hierarchical authority
—     reimburse to the applicant all the amounts not paid                        to reimburse, with effect from a year not further specified
      following implementation of the decisions annulment of                     (1993, 1996, 1997, or another year, and for the period
      which is sought, together with legal interest;                             during which the applicants were officials of the Commis-
                                                                                 sion of the European Communities), the cost of the sea
—     make the appropriate ruling as to costs and order the                      passage from Brindisi to various Greek frontier posts
      Commission of the European Communities to pay those                        (Corfu, Igoumenitsa, Patras) on the basis of an ‘aircraft
      costs.                                                                     type seat’ ticket;
                                                                           —     annul all the applicants' pay slips implementing the
                                                                                 decisions annulment of which is sought;
Pleas in law and main arguments
The applicant in this case seeks the annulment of the Commis-              —     reimburse to the applicants all the amounts not paid
sion's decision changing the method of calculating annual                        following implementation of the decisions annulment of
travel expenses to Greece.                                                       which is sought, together with legal interest;
The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the
applicant in support of his application are similar to those of            —     make the appropriate ruling as to costs and order the
the applicants in Cases T-221/02 (1) and T-44/03 (2).                            Commission of the European Communities to pay those
                                                                                 costs.
(1) OJ C 247, 12.10.02, p. 17.
(2) OJ C 101, 26.04.03, p. 40.
                                                                           Pleas in law and main arguments
Action brought on 11 June 2003 by Stavroula Gogos-                         The applicants in this case seek the annulment of the Commis-
Skarpatzi and Others against the Commission of the                         sion's decision changing the method of calculating annual
                      European Communities                                 travel expenses to Greece.
                           (Case T-208/03)
                                                                           The pleas in law and main arguments put forward by the
                          (2003/C 184/113)                                 applicants in support of their application are similar to those
                                                                           of the applicants in Cases T-221/02 (1) and T-44/03 (2).
                    (Language of the case: French)
                                                                           (1) OJ C 247, 12.10.02, p. 17.
                                                                           (2) OJ C 101, 26.04.03, p. 40.
An action against the Commission of the European Commu-
nities was brought before the Court of First Instance of the