CELEX: 62008TN0407
Language: en
Date: 2008-09-22 00:00:00
Title: Case T-407/08: Action brought on 22 September 2008 — MIP Metro v OHIM — CBT Comunicación Multimedia (Metromeet)

20.12.2008   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 327/31
            
         Action brought on 22 September 2008 — MIP Metro v OHIM — CBT Comunicación Multimedia (Metromeet)
   (Case T-407/08)
   (2008/C 327/57)
   Language in which the application was lodged: German
   Parties
   
      Applicant: MIP Metro Group Intellectual Property GmbH & Co. KG (Dusseldorf, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: CBT Comunicación Multimedia, SL (Getxo, Spain)
   Form of order sought
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 June 2008 in Case R 387/2007-1 as it is incompatible with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trade mark and refuse application No 37 405 29 for the Community trade mark ‘metromeet’;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those of the opposition and appeal proceedings.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   
      Applicant for a Community trade mark: CBT Comunicación Multimedia, SL
   
      Community trade mark concerned: Figurative mark ‘Metromeet’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35 and 41 — Application No 3 740 529
   
      Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: MIP Metro
   
      Mark or sign cited in opposition: The national figurative mark ‘METRO’ and the word mark ‘meeting metro’ for goods and services in Classes 9, 16, 35 and 41
   
      Decision of the Opposition Division: Opposition upheld
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division and rejection of the opposition
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 in that there is a likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue.