CELEX: C2002/180/36
Language: en
Date: 2002-07-27 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 14 May 2002 in Case T-194/00: Nuno Antas de Campos v European Parliament (Official — Rejection for definitive termination of service — Action for annulment and damages)

C 180/22                 EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                           27.7.2002
     JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                    JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                                      of 16 May 2002
                           of 14 May 2002
                                                                            in Case T-17/01: Georgios Rounis v Commission of the
                                                                                               European Communities (1)
in Case T-194/00: Nuno Antas de Campos v European
                             Parliament (1)
                                                                            (Officials — Transfer of a part of remuneration in the
                                                                            currency of a Member State other than the country in which
                                                                            the institution has its seat — Articles 17(2)(a) and (b) of
(Official — Rejection for definitive termination of service                 Annex VII to the Staff Regulations — Combined application)
             — Action for annulment and damages)
                                                                                                      (2002/C 180/37)
                           (2002/C 180/36)
                                                                                                (Language of the case: French)
                   (Language of the case: Portuguese)
                                                                            In Case T-17/01, Georgios Rounis, an official of the Com-
                                                                            mission of the European Communities, residing in Brussels,
                                                                            represented by E. Boigelot, avocat, with an address for service
                                                                            in Luxembourg, against the Commission of the European
                                                                            Communities (Agents: J. Currall and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart)
In Case T-194/00: Nuno Antas de Campos, an official of                      — first, application for annulment of the Commission’s
the European Parliament, residing in Lisbon, represented by                 decision of 24 February 2000 limiting transfer of the appli-
C. Botelho Moniz, lawyer, against the European Parliament                   cant’s emoluments to the United Kingdom to 19 % of his net
(Agents: R. Da Silva Passos and J.F. De Wachter) — Application              monthly earnings and of Conclusion No 102/84 of the College
for annulment of the decision of 3 September 1999, rejecting                of Heads of Administration relating to the transfer of the
the applicant’s request for termination of service under Council            emoluments of officials and resident agents and, second,
Regulation (EC, EURATOM, ECSC) No 2688/95 introducing                       application for damages and interest for the material damage
special measures to terminate the service of officials of the               allegedly suffered — the Court of First Instance (Fourth
European Communities as a result of the accession of Austria,               Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, V. Tiili and
Finland and Sweden (OJ 1995 L 280, p. 1), and for compen-                   P. Mengozzi, Judges; J. Plingers, Administrator for the Registrar,
sation for damage — the Court of First Instance (Second                     has given a judgment on 16 May 2002, in which it:
Chamber), composed of R.M. Moura Ramos, President, J. Pir-
rung and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; J. Palacio González, Adminis-
trator for the Registrar, has given a judgment on 14 May 2002,              1.    Annuls the Commission’s decision of 24 February 2000
in which it:                                                                      limiting the transfer of the applicant’s emoluments to the
                                                                                  United Kingdom to 19 % of his monthly earnings;
1.     Dismisses the claims for annulment as unfounded;                     2.    Orders the Commission to make good the damage suffered by
                                                                                  the applicant as the result of the decision of 24 February 2000,
                                                                                  with interest for late payment at the annual rate of 5,25 %
2.     Dismisses the claims for compensation for damage caused by                 annually until payment;
       the contested decision as unfounded;
                                                                            3.    Orders the parties to submit to the Court of First Instance,
                                                                                  within five months of the date of delivery of the present
3.     Dismisses the remainder of the claim for compensation as                   judgment, the amounts to be paid, drawn up by common
       inadmissible;                                                              accord;
                                                                            4.    Failing agreement, orders the parties to submit details on the
4.     Orders the parties to bear their own costs.                                amounts proposed within that same time-limit;
                                                                            5.    Reserves the decision on costs.
( 1) OJ C 285 of 7.10.2000, p. 17.
                                                                            (1) OJ C 95 of 24.3.2001.