CELEX: 62013TB0031
Language: en
Date: 2013-09-16 00:00:00
Title: Case T-31/13 P: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Bouillez v Council (Appeal — Civil service — Officials — Promotion — 2007 promotion year — Decision not to promote the appellant to Grade AST 7 — Obligation to state reasons — Article 266 TFEU — Article 45 of the Staff Regulations — Contradictory reasons — Comparative examination of the merits — Appeal in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)

16.11.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 336/25
            
         Order of the General Court of 16 September 2013 — Bouillez v Council
   (Case T-31/13 P) (1)
   
   (Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2007 promotion year - Decision not to promote the appellant to Grade AST 7 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 266 TFEU - Article 45 of the Staff Regulations - Contradictory reasons - Comparative examination of the merits - Appeal in part clearly inadmissible and in part clearly unfounded)
   2013/C 336/53
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Vincent Bouillez (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: D. Abreu Caldas, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and É. Marchal, lawyers)
   
      Other party: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and A. Bisch, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal brought against the decision of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 14 November 2012 in Case F-75/11 Bouillez v Council (not yet published in the ECR), and seeking the setting aside of that judgment.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is rejected.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Mr Vincent Bouillez is to bear his own costs and those incurred by the Council of the European Union in these proceedings.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 86, 23.3.2013.