CELEX: 62013TN0400
Language: en
Date: 2013-08-05 00:00:00
Title: Case T-400/13: Action brought on 5 August 2013 — L’Oréal v OHIM — Cosmetica Cabinas (AINHOA)

12.10.2013   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 298/9
            
         Action brought on 5 August 2013 — L’Oréal v OHIM — Cosmetica Cabinas (AINHOA)
   (Case T-400/13)
   2013/C 298/16
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: L’Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Granado Carpenter and M. Polo Carreño, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cosmetica Cabinas, SL (El Masnou, Spain)
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 6 June 2013 given in Case R 1643/2012-1;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Award the applicant the cost of proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   
      Registered Community trade mark in respect of which a declaration of invalidity has been sought: Word mark ‘AINHOA’ — Community trade mark registration No 2 720 811
   
      Proprietor of the Community trade mark: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Applicant for the declaration of invalidity of the Community trade mark: The applicant
   
      Grounds for the application for a declaration of invalidity: The cancellation applicant relied on Article 8(1)(b) and 8(5) in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
   
      Decision of the Cancellation Division: Rejected the application for a declaration of invalidity
   
      Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissed the appeal
   
      Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) and/or 8(5), in conjunction with Article 53(1)(a) of Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.