CELEX: 62015TA0402
Language: en
Date: 2018-03-01 00:00:00
Title: Case T-402/15: Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2018 — Poland v Commission (ERDF — Refusal to confirm a financial contribution to a major project — Article 41(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 — Assessment of the contribution of a major project to the achievement of the objectives of the operational programme — Article 41(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 — Time limit exceeded)

23.4.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 142/41
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2018 — Poland v Commission
   (Case T-402/15) (1)
   
   ((ERDF - Refusal to confirm a financial contribution to a major project - Article 41(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 - Assessment of the contribution of a major project to the achievement of the objectives of the operational programme - Article 41(2) of Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 - Time limit exceeded))
   (2018/C 142/53)
   Language of the case: Polish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B.-R. Killmann and M. Siekierzyńska, acting as Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 3228 final of 11 May 2015, refusing to confirm to the Republic of Poland a financial contribution from the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) to the major project ‘European Shared Services Centre — Intelligent Logistics Systems’ in the context of Priority Axis 4 of operational programme ‘Innovative Economy’.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 311, 21.9.2015.