CELEX: 62012CB0075
Language: en
Date: 2012-07-04 00:00:00
Title: Case C-75/12: Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Majali Abdel (Reference for a preliminary ruling — No description of the main proceedings — manifestly inadmissible)

6.10.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 303/8
            
         Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 4 July 2012 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di Pace di Revere — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Majali Abdel
   (Case C-75/12) (1)
   
   (Reference for a preliminary ruling - No description of the main proceedings - manifestly inadmissible)
   2012/C 303/17
   Language of the case: Italian
   
      Referring court
   
   Giudice di Pace di Revere
   
      Party in the main proceedings
   
   Majali Abdel
   
      Re:
   
   Reference for a preliminary ruling — Giudice di Pace di Revere — Interpretation of Articles 2, 4, 6, 7, 8, 15 and 16 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals (OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98) and Article 4(3) TEU — National legislation imposing a fine on a foreign national who has entered national territory illegally or has stayed there illegally — Whether it is permissible to regard illegal stay as a criminal offence — Whether it is possible to substitute for the fine an order for immediate expulsion for a period of at least five years or a measure restricting freedom (‘permanenza domiciliare’) — Member States’ obligations during the period for transposition of a directive
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   The reference for a preliminary ruling from the Giudice di pace di Revere (Italy), by decision of 26 January 2012, is manifestly inadmissible.
   
      (1)  OJ C 118, 21.4.2012.