CELEX: 62005TN0444
Language: en
Date: 2005-12-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-444/05: Action brought on  21 December 2005  — Navigazione Libera del Golfo v Commission

25.2.2006   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 48/40
            
         Action brought on 21 December 2005 — Navigazione Libera del Golfo v Commission
   (Case T-444/05)
   (2006/C 48/77)
   Language of the case: Italian
   Parties
   
      Applicant: Navigazione Libera del Golfo (NLG) (Naples, Italy) (represented by: Salvatore Ravenna, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Commission of the European Communities
   Form of order sought
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the decision of the Commission of 12 October 2005 refusing access to data and information concerning the extra costs arising as a result of PSO (public service obligations) and payments to offset those costs in respect of the services carried out by Caremar SpA on the Naples Beverello-Capri route;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order the Commission to pay the costs.
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
   The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Case T-109/05 Navigazione Libera del Golfo v Commission. (1)
   
   It should, however, be stated that the contested decision in Case T-109/05 is based on Article 4(2) of Regulation No 1049/2001, whereas the decision at issue in this case is based on Article 4(4) and (5) of that regulation. Accordingly, it was not Caremar that was consulted, as ‘third party author’ of the documents/data to which access was requested, but rather it was the Italian authorities, which did not issue the documents of the case and had no concerns relating to commercial interests, that were consulted.
   Further, that consultation was carried out in an artificial manner, given that the Member States have exclusive competence together with a right of veto which is binding on the Commission.
   
      (1)  OJ C 106 of 30.04.2005, p. 43.