CELEX: C2002/131/34
Language: en
Date: 2002-06-01 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 27 November 2001 in Case T-222/00: Otto Wöhr GmbH v Commission of the European Communities (State aid — Approval decisions — Refusal to open the procedure pursuant to Article 88(2) EC — Complaint — Admissibility)

C 131/18               EN                      Official Journal of the European Communities                                        1.6.2002
      ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
                                                                                                  of 17 January 2002
                     of 27 November 2001
                                                                          in Case T-236/00: Gabriele Stauner and Others v European
                                                                          Parliament and Commission of the European Communi-
                                                                                                          ties (1)
in Case T-222/00: Otto Wöhr GmbH v Commission of the
                  European Communities (1)
                                                                          (Action for annulment — Framework agreement on relations
                                                                          between the European Parliament and the Commission —
                                                                                         Article 197 EC — Inadmissibility)
(State aid — Approval decisions — Refusal to open the
procedure pursuant to Article 88(2) EC — Complaint —                                                (2002/C 131/35)
                          Admissibility)
                                                                                             (Language of the case: German)
                        (2002/C 131/34)
                                                                          In Case T-236/00: Gabriele Stauner, residing in Wolfratshausen
                                                                          (Germany), Freddy Blak, residing in Næstved (Denmark),
                  (Language of the case: German)                          Mogens Camre, residing in Copenhagen (Denmark), Rijk
                                                                          van Dam, residing in Rotterdam (Netherlands), Christopher
                                                                          Heaton-Harris, residing in Kettering, Northamptonshire
                                                                          (United Kingdom), Franz-Xaver Mayer, residing in Landau-
                                                                          sur-l’Isar (Germany), Ursula Schleicher, residing in Munich
                                                                          (Germany), Jens-Peter Bonde, residing in Bagsværd (Denmark),
                                                                          Theodorus Bouwman, residing in Eindhoven (Netherlands),
In Case T-222/00: Otto Wöhr GmbH, established at Friolzheim               Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, residing in Amsterdam (Nether-
(Germany), represented by C. Hebel and G. Walz, v Com-                    lands), Michl Ebner, residing in Bolzano (Italy), Joost Lagendijk,
mission of the European Communities, (Agents: K.-D. Borch-                residing in Rotterdam, Nelly Maes, residing in Sinaai (Belgium),
ardt and M. Nuñez-Müller), — application for annulment of                Franziska Emilia Müller, residing in Bruck (Upper Palatinate)
the Commission’s decision of 26 June 2000 not to open the                 (Germany), Alexander Radwan, residing in Rottach-Egern
formal examination procedure pursuant to Article 88(2) EC,                (Germany), Alexander de Roo, residing in Amsterdam, Heide
following the complaint lodged by the applicant concerning                Rühle, residing in Stuttgart (Germany), Inger Schöring, residing
State aid in favour of Hydraulik Markranstädt GmbH and                    in Gävle (Sweden), Esko Olavi Seppänen, residing in Helsinki
Hydraulik Seehausen GmbH, — the Court of First Instance                   (Finland), Bart Staes, residing in Antwerp (Belgium), Claude
(Second Chamber, Extended Composition), composed of                       Turmes, residing in Esch-sur-Alzette (Luxembourg), Lousewies
R.M. Moura Ramos, President, V. Tiili. J. Pirrung, P. Mengozzi            van der Laan, residing in Brussels (Belgium), Members of
and A.W.H. Meij, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an order on             the European Parliament, represented by J. Sedemund and
27 November 2001, the operative part of which is as follows:              T. Lübbig, Rechtsanwälte, with an address for service in
                                                                          Luxembourg, against European Parliament (Agents: C. Pennera
                                                                          and M. Berger) and Commission of the European Communities
                                                                          (Agents: U. Wölker and X. Lewis), — application for annulment
                                                                          of the Framework Agreement of 5 July 2000 on Relations
1.   The application is dismissed as inadmissible.
                                                                          between the European Parliament and the Commission (OJ
                                                                          2001 C 121, p. 122), — the Court of First Instance (Fourth
                                                                          Chamber), composed of M. Vilaras, President, V. Tiili and
2.   The parties are ordered to pay their own costs.                      P. Mengozzi, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, has made an order on
                                                                          17 January 2002, in which it:
3.   There is no need to give a decision on the Federal Republic of
                                                                          1.    Dismisses the application as inadmissible.
     Germany’s application to intervene.
                                                                          2.    Orders the applicants to pay their own costs and those of the
                                                                                Parliament and the Commission, including those incurred in
                                                                                the proceedings for interim measures.
(1) OJ C 316 of 4.11.2000.
                                                                          (1) OJ C 316 of 4.11.2000.