CELEX: 62016TN0316
Language: en
Date: 2016-06-21 00:00:00
Title: Case T-316/16: Action brought on 21 June 2016 — Moravia Consulting v EUIPO — Citizen Systems Europe (SDC-554S)

8.8.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 287/30
            
         Action brought on 21 June 2016 — Moravia Consulting v EUIPO — Citizen Systems Europe (SDC-554S)
   (Case T-316/16)
   (2016/C 287/36)
   Language in which the application was lodged: Czech
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Moravia Consulting spol. s.r.o. (Brno, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Kyjovský, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Citizen Systems Europe GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ‘SDC-554S’ — Application for registration No 12 780 581
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 April 2016 in Case R 1575/2015-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO to pay the costs.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95.