CELEX: 62008TA0534
Language: en
Date: 2010-09-30 00:00:00
Title: Case T-534/08: Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2010 — Granuband v OHIM — Granuflex (GRANUflex) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark GRANUflex — Previous company name and business name GRANUFLEX — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

20.11.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 317/28
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 30 September 2010 — Granuband v OHIM — Granuflex (GRANUflex)
   (Case T-534/08) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Community figurative mark GRANUflex - Previous company name and business name GRANUFLEX - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) and Article 52(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (now Article 8(4) and Article 53(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))
   2010/C 317/50
   Language of the case: Dutch
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Granuband BV (Krommenie, Netherlands) (represented by: M. Ellens, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: W. Verburg, Agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Granuflex Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft (Budapest, Hungary) (represented by: K. Szamosi, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 September 2008 (Case R 1277/2007-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Granuflex Ipari és Kereskedelmi Kft and Granuband BV.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Granuband BV to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 44 of 21.2.2009.