CELEX: 62016TN0465
Language: en
Date: 2016-08-23 00:00:00
Title: Case T-465/16: Action brought on 23 August 2016 — Cotecnica v EUIPO — Visán Industrias Zootécnicas (cotecnica OPTIMA)

10.10.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 371/25
            
         Action brought on 23 August 2016 — Cotecnica v EUIPO — Visán Industrias Zootécnicas (cotecnica OPTIMA)
   (Case T-465/16)
   (2016/C 371/27)
   Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: Cotecnica, SCCL (Bellpuig, Spain) (represented by: J. Devaureix, J. C. Erdozain López and J. Galán López, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Visán Industrias Zootécnicas, SL (Arganda, Spain)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant: Cotecnica, SCCL
   
      Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark containing the word elements ‘cotecnica OPTIMA’ — Application for registration No 13 292 479
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13/06/2016 in Case R 229/2016-2
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               declare the proposed evidence admissible;
            
         
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO to pay the costs.
            
         
      Plea in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 and case-law of the General Court, in particular, the judgment of 20 January 2009 in Case T-424/07, Pioneer Hi-Bred International v OHIM (OPTIMUM).