CELEX: 62017CA0176
Language: en
Date: 2018-09-13 00:00:00
Title: Case C-176/17: Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich — Poland) — Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej v Mariusz Wawrzosek (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Consumer protection — Directive 93/13/EEC — Unfair terms in consumer contracts — Directive 2008/48/EC — Order for payment procedure founded on a promissory note that secures the obligations arising from a consumer credit agreement)

12.11.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 408/20
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 13 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich — Poland) — Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej v Mariusz Wawrzosek
      (Case C-176/17) (1)
      
      ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Directive 2008/48/EC - Order for payment procedure founded on a promissory note that secures the obligations arising from a consumer credit agreement))
      (2018/C 408/24)
      Language of the case: Polish
      
         Referring court
      
      Sąd Rejonowy w Siemianowicach Śląskich
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicant: Profi Credit Polska S.A. w Bielsku Białej
      
         Defendant: Mariusz Wawrzosek
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      Article 7(1) of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which permits issue of an order for payment founded on a valid promissory note that secures a claim arising from a consumer credit agreement, where the court dealing with an application for an order for payment does not have the power to examine whether the terms of that agreement are unfair, if the detailed rules for exercising the right to lodge an objection against such an order do not enable observance of the rights which the consumer derives from that directive to be ensured.
      
         (1)  OJ C 300, 11.9.2017.