CELEX: C2005/182/65
Language: en
Date: 2005-07-23 00:00:00
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance of 25 May 2005 in Case T-352/02 Creative Technology Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for a Community word mark PC WORKS — Earlier national figurative mark W WORK PRO — Refusal of registration — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)

23.7.2005   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 182/35
            
         
      JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE
   
   of 25 May 2005
   in Case T-352/02 Creative Technology Ltd v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for a Community word mark PC WORKS - Earlier national figurative mark W WORK PRO - Refusal of registration - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94)
   (2005/C 182/65)
   Language of the case: English
   In Case T-352/02: Creative Technology Ltd, established in Singapore (Singapore), represented by M. Edenborough, Barrister, J. Flintoft, S. Jones and P. Rawlinson, Solicitors, against Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (Agents: B. Holst Filtenborg and S. Laitinen), the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM being José Vila Ortiz, residing in Valencia (Spain) — action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 September 2002 (Case R 265/2001-4) relating to an opposition between Creative Technology Ltd and José Vila Ortiz — the Court of First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of H. Legal, President, P. Mengozzi and I. Wiszniewska Białecka, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, gave a judgment on 25 May 2005, in which it:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders the applicant to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 19 of 25.1.2003.