CELEX: 62005TJ0221
Language: en
Date: 2008-07-08
Title: Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2008.#Huvis Corp. v Council of the European Union.#Dumping - Imports of polyester staple fibres from Korea - Regulation terminating an interim review - Application of a different methodology to that used in the initial investigation - Requirement of a change in circumstances - Adjustment claimed for credit costs - Credit periods - Burden of proof - Principle of sound administration - Article 2(10)(b) and (g) and Article 11(9) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96.#Case T-221/05.

Judgment of the Court of First Instance (Third Chamber) of 8 July 2008 – Huvis v Council
      (Case T-221/05)
      Dumping – Imports of polyester staple fibres from Korea – Regulation terminating an interim review – Application of a different methodology to that used in the initial investigation – Requirement of a change in circumstances – Adjustment claimed for credit costs – Credit periods – Burden of proof – Principle of sound administration – Article 2(10)(b) and (g) and Article 11(9) of Regulation (EC) No 384/96
      1.                     Common commercial policy – Protection against dumping – Review procedure – Amendment of the method of calculating the adjustment
            made in respect of import charges and indirect taxes (Council Regulation No 384/96, Arts 2(10), 11(9) and 17) (see paras 39,
            41-42, 48-51, 55, 60)
      2.                     Common commercial policy – Protection against dumping – Dumping margin – Claim for adjustment under Article 2(10)(g) of Regulation
            No 384/96 – Burden of proof (Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Art. 41; Agreement on Implementation of
            Article VI of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, ‘the 1994 Anti-dumping Code’, Art. 2(4); Council Regulation No 384/96,
            Art. 2(10)(g)) (see paras 71-78, 82, 92, 98-101)
      Re:
      
         
               APPLICATION, first, for the annulment of Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 of 10 March 2005 imposing a definitive
                  anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China and Saudi Arabia, amending
                  Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in
                  the Republic of Korea and terminating the anti-dumping proceeding in respect of such imports originating in Taiwan (OJ 2005
                  L 71, p. 1) and, second, for a declaration under Article 241 EC that the provisions of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96 of
                  22 December 1995 on protection against dumped imports from countries not members of the European Community (OJ 1996 L 56,
                  p. 1) are inapplicable to the extent to which they support the disputed conclusions contained in Regulation No 428/2005.
               
            Operative part
      The Court:
      
         
                  1.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Annuls Article 2 of Council Regulation (EC) No 428/2005 of 10 March 2005 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports
                     of polyester staple fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China and Saudi Arabia, amending Regulation (EC) No 2852/2000
                     imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of polyester staple fibres originating in the Republic of Korea and terminating
                     the anti-dumping proceeding in respect of such imports originating in Taiwan, to the extent to which the anti-dumping duty
                     imposed on exports into the European Community of goods produced and exported by Huvis Corp. exceeds that which would be applicable
                     if the ‘input’ method, used in the initial investigation, had been used to calculate the adjustment to the normal value for
                     import charges and indirect taxes;
                  
               
            
         
                  2.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Dismisses the action as to the remainder;
               
            
         
                  3.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Orders the Council to bear its own costs and to pay 70% of the costs incurred by Huvis Corp.; 
               
            
         
                  4.
               
               
                  
               
               
                  	Orders the Commission to bear its own costs.