CELEX: 62010TA0174
Language: en
Date: 2011-09-22 00:00:00
Title: Case T-174/10: Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — ara v OHIM — Allrounder (A with two rectangular motifs) (Community trade mark — Opposition procedure — International registration covering the European Community — Figurative mark A with two triangular motifs — Earlier national word mark A — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

29.10.2011   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 319/18
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2011 — ara v OHIM — Allrounder (A with two rectangular motifs)
   (Case T-174/10) (1)
   
   (Community trade mark - Opposition procedure - International registration covering the European Community - Figurative mark A with two triangular motifs - Earlier national word mark A - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
   2011/C 319/36
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: ara AG (Langenfeld, Germany) (represented initially by M. Gial, then by M. Gial and H. Pernez, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, agent)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Allrounder SARL (Sarrebourg, France) (represented by: N. Boespflug, lawyer)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 January 2010 (Case R 481/2009-1) concerning opposition proceedings between ara AG and Allrounder SARL.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders ara AG to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 179, 3.7.2010.