CELEX: 62015TN0259
Language: en
Date: 2015-05-26 00:00:00
Title: Case T-259/15: Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Close and Cegelec v Parliament

20.7.2015   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 236/48
            
         Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Close and Cegelec v Parliament
   (Case T-259/15)
   (2015/C 236/63)
   Language of the case: French
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicants: SA Close (Harzé-Aywaille, Belgium) and Cegelec (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-M. Rikkers and J.-L. Teheux, lawyers)
   
      Defendant: European Parliament
   
      Form of order sought
   
   
               —
            
            
               Annul the decision taken on an unknown date by the European Parliament to award the public works contract concerning the ‘extension and upgrading project for the Konrad Adenauer Building in Luxembourg’ Lot 73 (energy centre), reference INLO-D-UPIL-T-14-A04, to the Association Momentanée ENERGIE-KAD (composed of the companies Mersch et Schmitz Production Sàrl and Energolux S.A.) and, accordingly, not to award the contract to the applicants.
            
         
      Pleas in law and main arguments
   
   In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.
   
               1.
            
            
               First plea in law, alleging an infringement of the duty to state reasons and of the principle of transparency, in so far as a reading of the grounds for the rejection of the applicants’ bid and the extracts from the decision awarding the contract to the Association Momentanée ENERGIE-KAD does not enable it to be ascertained whether those tenderers satisfied the requirements of qualitative selection laid down in the contract documents.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and infringement of the principles of equal treatment and non-discrimination.
            
         The applicants submit that the European Parliament committed a manifest error of assessment in awarding the contract in question to the Association Momentanée ENERGIE-KAD and that the selection criteria were not applied in accordance with the tender specifications and in compliance with the principles of transparency, proportionality, equal treatment and non-discrimination required under Article 102 of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 (1).
   
      (1)  Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 966/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on the financial rules applicable to the general budget of the Union and repealing Council Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1605/2002 (OJ 2012 L 298, p. 1).