CELEX: 62016TN0061
Language: en
Date: 2016-02-12 00:00:00
Title: Case T-61/16: Action brought on 12 February 2016 — Coca-Cola v EUIPO — Mitico (Master)

29.3.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 111/38
            
         Action brought on 12 February 2016 — Coca-Cola v EUIPO — Mitico (Master)
   (Case T-61/16)
   (2016/C 111/46)
   Language in which the application was lodged: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Applicant: The Coca-Cola Company (Atlanta, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz and S. Baran, Barristers; D. Stone and A. Dykes, Solicitors)
   
      Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
   
      Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Modern Industrial & Trading Investment Co. Ltd (Mitico) (Damascus, Syria)
   
      Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
   
   
      Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
   
      Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word element ‘Master’ — Application for registration No 9 091 612
   
      Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
   
      Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2015 in Case R 1251/2015-4
   
      Form of order sought
   
   The applicant claims that the Court should:
   
               —
            
            
               annul the contested decision;
            
         
               —
            
            
               order EUIPO and the EU trade mark Applicant to bear their own costs and pay those costs of the Applicant for Annulment at every stage of the opposition and appeal process, including the costs of these proceedings.
            
         
      Pleas in law
   
   
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 8(5)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;
            
         
               —
            
            
               Infringement of Article 65(6) of Regulation No 207/2009.