CELEX: 62020TN0476
Language: en
Date: 2020-07-27 00:00:00
Title: Case T-476/20: Action brought on 27 July 2020 — Alteryx v EUIPO — Allocate Software (ALLOCATE)

21.9.2020   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 313/31
            
         
      Action brought on 27 July 2020 — Alteryx v EUIPO — Allocate Software (ALLOCATE)
      (Case T-476/20)
      (2020/C 313/44)
      Language of the case: English
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Alteryx, Inc. (Irvine, California, United States) (represented by: A. Poulter and M. Holah, Solicitors)
      
         Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
      
         Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Allocate Software Ltd (London, United Kingdom)
      
         Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
      
      
         Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court
      
         Trade mark at issue: European Union word mark ALLOCATE — European Union trade mark No 6 740 658
      
         Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings
      
         Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 May 2020 in Case R 1709/2019-4
      
         Form of order sought
      
      The applicant claims that the Court should:
      
                  —
               
               
                  annul the contested decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  annul the Cancellation Division decision;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  order the defendant to bear its own costs and to pay those of the applicant, including those relating to the procedure before the Board of Appeal;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  in the event that the other party participates in the proceedings as intervener, order it to bear his own costs.
               
            
         Pleas in law
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 58(1)(a) in connection with Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Infringement of Article 94(1) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council insofar as the Board of Appeal failed to state the reasons on which the decision is based.