CELEX: C2001/134/48
Language: en
Date: 2001-05-05 00:00:00
Title: Order of the Court of First Instance of 10 January 2001 in Case T-153/00: Spain Pharma S.A. v Commission of the European Communities (Action for a declaration of failure to act — Case not proceeding to judgment)

C 134/22                EN                       Official Journal of the European Communities                                      5.5.2001
ed by D. Fosselard, of the Brussels Bar, with an address for                ORDER OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF FIRST
service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of Messrs Arendt &                                                 INSTANCE
Medernach, 8-10 Rue Mathias Hardt, v Commission of the
European Communities (Agents: M.-J. Jonczy and E. Paasivirta)
– application for annulment of the Commission’s decision of                                         of 15 January 2001
23 March 2000 terminating the contract concluded with the
applicant relating to the Dionysos project — the Court of
First Instance (Fourth Chamber), composed of: P. Mengozzi,                  in Case T-236/00 R: Gabriele Stauner and Others
President, and V. Tiili and R.M. Moura Ramos, Judges; H. Jung,              v. European Parliament and Commission of the European
Registrar, made an order on 9 January 2001, the operative                                              Communities
part of which is as follows:
1.    The application is dismissed as inadmissible.                         (Interim relief proceedings — Framework agreement on
                                                                            Relations between the European Parliament and the Com-
2.    The applicant is to pay the costs, including those relating to the             mission — Article 197 CE — Admissibility)
      proceedings for interim measures.
                                                                                                      (2001/C 134/49)
(1) OJ C 233 of 12.8.2000.
                                                                                               (Language of the case: German)
                                                                            In Case T-236/00 R: Gabriele Stauner, residing in Wolfrats-
                                                                            hausen (Germany), Freddy Blak, residing in Næstved (Den-
       ORDER OF THE COURT OF FIRST INSTANCE                                 mark), Jens-Peter Bonde, residing in Bagsværd (Denmark),
                                                                            Theodorus Bouwman, residing in Eindhoven (Netherlands),
                        of 10 January 2001                                  Kathalijne Maria Buitenweg, residing in Amsterdam (Nether-
                                                                            lands), Mogens Camre, residing in Copenhagen, Rijk van Dam,
                                                                            residing in Rotterdam (Netherlands), Michl Ebner, residing
in Case T-153/00: Spain Pharma S.A. v Commission of the                     in Bolzano (Italy), Christopher Heaton-Harris, residing in
                   European Communities (1)                                 Kettering, Northamptonshire (United Kingdom), Lousewies
                                                                            van der Laan, residing in Brussels, Joost Lagendijk, residing in
(Action for a declaration of failure to act — Case not                      Rotterdam, Nelly Maes, residing in Sinaai (Belgium), Franz-
                     proceeding to judgment)                                Xaver Mayer, residing in Landau-sur-l’Isar (Germany), Franzis-
                                                                            ka Emilia Müller, residing in Bruck (Upper Palatinate) (Germ-
                          (2001/C 134/48)                                   any), Alexander Radwan, residing in Rottach-Egern (Germany),
                                                                            Alexander de Roo, residing in Amsterdam, Heide Rühle,
                                                                            residing in Stuttgart (Germany), Ursula Schleicher, residing in
                   (Language of the case: Spanish)                          Munich (Germany), Inger Schöring, residing in Gävle (Sweden),
                                                                            Esko Olavi Seppänen, residing in Helsinki, Bart Staes, residing
                                                                            in Antwerp (Belgium), Claude Turmes, residing in Esch-sur-
In Case T-153/00: Spain Pharma S.A., established in Madrid,                 Alzette (Luxembourg), Members of the European Parliament,
represented by R. Gutiérrez Sánchez, of the Madrid Bar, with               represented by J. Sedemund et T. Lübbig, Rechtsanwälte,
an address for service in Luxembourg at the Chambers of                     Berlin, with an address for service in Luxembourg at the
Messrs Molitor, Feltgen & Harpes, 55 Boulevard de la Pétrusse,              Chambers of M. di Stefano, 49 Avenue de la Gare, against
v Commission of the European Communities (Agent: E. Gip-                    European Parliament (Agents: C. Pennera et M. Berger) and
pini Fournier) — application for a declaration that the                     Commission of the European Communities (Agents: U. Wölker
Commission has improperly failed, in breach of the Treaty, to               et X. Lewis) — application for suspension of application, first,
take a decision on a complaint concerning alleged infringe-                 of paragraphs 17 and 19 of the Framework Agreement of
ments of Articles 81 and 82 EC — the Court of First Instance                5 July 2000 on Relations between the European Parliament
(Second Chamber), composed of: A.W.H. Meij, President, and                  and the Commission and, second, Annex 3 to that Framework
A. Potocki and J. Pirrung, Judges; H. Jung, Registrar, made an              Agreement, the President of the Court of First Instance has
order on 10 January 2001, the operative part of which is as                 made an order on 15 January 2001, the operative part of
follows:                                                                    which is as follows:
1.    There is no need to adjudicate on the present action.
                                                                            1.    The application for interim relief is dismissed;
2.    The parties are to bear their own costs.
                                                                            2.    The decision as to costs is reserved.
( 1) OJ C 247 of 26.8.2000.