CELEX: 62014CA0247
Language: en
Date: 2016-03-10 00:00:00
Title: Case C-247/14 P: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — HeidelbergCement AG v European Commission (Appeal — Competition — Market for ‘cement and related products’ — Administrative procedure — Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 — Article 18(1) and (3) — Decision requesting information — Statement of reasons — Clarification of the application)

2.5.2016   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 156/6
            
         Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 10 March 2016 — HeidelbergCement AG v European Commission
   (Case C-247/14 P) (1)
   
   ((Appeal - Competition - Market for ‘cement and related products’ - Administrative procedure - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 18(1) and (3) - Decision requesting information - Statement of reasons - Clarification of the application))
   (2016/C 156/06)
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: HeidelbergCement AG (represented by: U. Denzel, C. von Köckritz and P. Pichler, Rechtsanwälte)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: M. Kellerbauer, L. Malferrari and R. Sauer, acting as Agents)
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 March 2014 in HeidelbergCement v Commission (T-302/11, EU:T:2014:128);
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Annuls Commission Decision C(2011) 2361 final of 30 March 2011 relating to a proceeding under Article 18(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (Case COMP/39520 — Cement and related products);
            
         
               3.
            
            
               Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by HeidelbergCement AG with respect to both the proceedings at first instance in Case T-302/11 and the appeal.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 223, 14.7.2014.