CELEX: 62011CB0491
Language: en
Date: 2012-06-27 00:00:00
Title: Case C-491/11 P: Order of the Court of 27 June 2012 — Fuchshuber Agrarhandel GmbH v European Commission (Appeals — Common Agricultural Policy — Purchase of maize from the Hungarian intervention agency — Insufficient stocks — Alleged failure by the Commission in its obligation to conduct checks — Non-contractual liability)

24.11.2012   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 366/20
            
         Order of the Court of 27 June 2012 — Fuchshuber Agrarhandel GmbH v European Commission
   (Case C-491/11 P) (1)
   
   (Appeals - Common Agricultural Policy - Purchase of maize from the Hungarian intervention agency - Insufficient stocks - Alleged failure by the Commission in its obligation to conduct checks - Non-contractual liability)
   2012/C 366/34
   Language of the case: German
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Fuchshuber Agrarhandel GmbH (represented by: G. Lehner, Rechtsanwalt)
   
      Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. von Rintelen and D. Triantafyllou, Agents)
   
      Re:
   
   Appeal against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 21 July 2011 in Case T-451/10 Fuchshuber Agrarhandel v Commission, by which that Court dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law the action for damages seeking to obtain compensation for the loss allegedly suffered by reason of the Commission’s failure to check the conditions governing the implementation of standing invitations to tender for the resale on the Community market of cereals, in this case maize held by the Hungarian intervention agency.
   
      Operative part of the order
   
   The Court hereby orders:
   
               1.
            
            
               The appeal is dismissed.
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Fuchshuber Agrarhandel GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 13, 14.01.2012.