CELEX: 62021CN0684
Language: en
Date: 2021-11-12 00:00:00
Title: Case C-684/21: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 12 November 2021 — Papierfabriek Doetinchem B.V. v Sprick GmbH Bielefelder Papier- und Wellpappenwerk & Co.

21.2.2022   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 84/27
            
         
      Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 12 November 2021 — Papierfabriek Doetinchem B.V. v Sprick GmbH Bielefelder Papier- und Wellpappenwerk & Co.
      (Case C-684/21)
      (2022/C 84/35)
      Language of the case: German
      
         Referring court
      
      Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Appellant: Papierfabriek Doetinchem B.V.
      
         Respondent: Sprick GmbH Bielefelder Papier- und Wellpappenwerk & Co.
      
         Questions referred
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  According to the case-law of the Court of Justice, the assessment as to whether the features of appearance of a product are dictated exclusively by its technical function must be made having regard to the design at issue, (1) the objective circumstances indicative of the reasons which dictated the choice of features of appearance of the product concerned, information on its use or the existence of alternative designs which fulfil the same technical function (Court of Justice of the European Union, judgment of 8 March 2018, DOCERAM, C-395/16, EU:C:2018:172). With regard to the aspect of the existence of other designs, what significance is attached to the fact that the proprietor of the design also holds design rights for numerous alternative designs?
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  In the assessment as to whether the appearance is dictated exclusively by the technical function, is it necessary to take into account the fact that the design allows for a multicolour appearance in the case where the colour design is not, as such, apparent from the registration?
               
            
                  3.
               
               
                  If Question 2 is answered in the affirmative: Does this affect the scope of protection of the design?
               
            
         (1)  Within the meaning of Article 8 of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs (OJ 2002 L 3, p. 1).