CELEX: 62017TB0757
Language: en
Date: 2018-06-26 00:00:00
Title: Case T-757/17: Order of the General Court of 26 June 2018 — Kerstens v Commission (Civil service — Officials — Disciplinary proceedings — Enforcement of a judgment delivered by the General Court on appeal — Withdrawal of the decision imposing a reprimand — Reopening of the disciplinary proceedings which led to the cancelled sanction — Claim for annulment — Act not adversely affecting an official — Claim for damages — Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure — Manifest inadmissibility)

27.8.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 301/36
            
         
      Order of the General Court of 26 June 2018 — Kerstens v Commission
      (Case T-757/17) (1)
      
      ((Civil service - Officials - Disciplinary proceedings - Enforcement of a judgment delivered by the General Court on appeal - Withdrawal of the decision imposing a reprimand - Reopening of the disciplinary proceedings which led to the cancelled sanction - Claim for annulment - Act not adversely affecting an official - Claim for damages - Failure to follow the pre-litigation procedure - Manifest inadmissibility))
      (2018/C 301/47)
      Language of the case: French
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: Petrus Kerstens (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: C. Mourato, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Commission (represented by: B. Mongin and R. Striani, acting as Agents)
      
         Re:
      
      Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking (i) annulment of two Commission memoranda of 27 March and 6 April 2017 and (ii) compensation for the non-material damage which the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of the outcome and duration of the disciplinary proceedings CMS 15/017 and CMS 12/063.
      
         Operative part of the order
      
      
                  1.
               
               
                  The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.
               
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Mr Petrus Kerstens is ordered to pay the costs.
               
            
         (1)  OJ C 32, 29.1.2018.