CELEX: 62007TA0340
Language: en
Date: 2010-02-09 00:00:00
Title: Case T-340/07: Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission (Arbitration clause — eContent programme — Contract relating to a project designed to ensure maximum effectiveness of the programme and the widest possible participation of target groups — Non-performance of the contract — Termination of the contract)

27.3.2010   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 80/23
            
         Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2010 — Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission
   (Case T-340/07) (1)
   
   (Arbitration clause - ‘eContent’ programme - Contract relating to a project designed to ensure maximum effectiveness of the programme and the widest possible participation of target groups - Non-performance of the contract - Termination of the contract)
   2010/C 80/39
   Language of the case: English
   
      Parties
   
   
      Appellant: Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)
   
      Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Manhaeve, Agent, assisted by D. Philippe and M. Gouden, lawyers)
   
      Re:
   
   Action brought under Articles 235 EC, 238 EC and 288 EC for an order that the Commission make good damage suffered as a result of its failure to comply with contractual obligations in the context of the performance of the EDC-53007 EEBO/27873 contract relating to the project entitled ‘e-Content Exposure and Business Opportunities’.
   
      Operative part of the judgment
   
   The Court:
   
               1.
            
            
               Dismisses the action;
            
         
               2.
            
            
               Orders Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE to pay the costs.
            
         
      (1)  OJ C 269, 10.11.2007.