CELEX: 62018TN0418
Language: en
Date: 2018-07-06 00:00:00
Title: Case T-418/18: Action brought on 6 July 2018 — PT v European Investment Bank (EIB)

15.10.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 373/11
            
         
      Action brought on 6 July 2018 — PT v European Investment Bank (EIB)
      (Case T-418/18)
      (2018/C 373/12)
      Language of the case: Swedish
      
         Parties
      
      
         Applicant: PT (represented by: E. Nordh, lawyer)
      
         Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB)
      
         Form of order sought
      
      
                  —
               
               
                  Annul the decision of the EIB of 4 April 2018 dismissing the applicant;
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Order the defendant to compensate the applicant for material harm amounting at present to EUR 2 240,31 and non-material harm evaluated at EUR 50 000, and
               
            
                  —
               
               
                  Order the defendant to pay the costs of the action.
               
            
         Pleas in law and main arguments
      
      In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.
      
                  1.
               
               
                  First plea in law, alleging disregard of the rights of the defence
                  
                              —
                           
                           
                              The applicant claims that the defendant did not give the applicant the opportunity of defending himself against its allegations under the best possible conditions. The applicant is of the opinion that his right to sound administration was thereby breached.
                           
                        
            
                  2.
               
               
                  Second plea in law, alleging manifest errors of assessment
                  
                              —
                           
                           
                              The applicant claims that, in connection with the defendant’s disregard of his rights of the defence, it also committed a number of manifest errors of assessment.