CELEX: 62017CA0012
Language: en
Date: 2018-10-04 00:00:00
Title: Case C-12/17: Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — Tribunalul Botoşani, Ministerul Justiţiei v Maria Dicu (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Organisation of working time — Directive 2003/88/EC — Right to paid annual leave — Directive 2010/18/EU — Revised Framework Agreement on parental leave — Parental leave not regarded as a period of actual work)

3.12.2018   
            
            
               EN
            
            
               Official Journal of the European Union
            
            
               C 436/7
            
         
      Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 4 October 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — Tribunalul Botoşani, Ministerul Justiţiei v Maria Dicu
      (Case C-12/17) (1)
      
      ((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Right to paid annual leave - Directive 2010/18/EU - Revised Framework Agreement on parental leave - Parental leave not regarded as a period of actual work))
      (2018/C 436/06)
      Language of the case: Romanian
      
         Referring court
      
      Curtea de Apel Cluj
      
         Parties to the main proceedings
      
      
         Applicants: Tribunalul Botoşani, Ministerul Justiţiei
      
         Defendant: Maria Dicu
      
         Intervening parties: Curtea de Apel Suceava, Consiliul Superior al Magistraturii
      
         Operative part of the judgment
      
      Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time is to be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law, such as the provision at issue in the main proceedings, which, for the purpose of determining a worker’s entitlement to paid annual leave, as guaranteed by that article for a worker in respect of a given reference period, does not treat the amount of time spent by that worker on parental leave during that reference period as a period of actual work.
      
         (1)  OJ C 104, 3.4.2017.